HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/02/01 - Agenda Packet.r
•�•ri
aTY or
RANa-13 CU�ANX GA
CITY (x)(Y.14 L
AGENDA,
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Bnme Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
February 1. 1984 — 7:12.y..-
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be In writing. The
deadline for oub.elttin•3 these Items is StOJ p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the
meeting. Ilia City Clerk's Office receives all etch items.
1. CALL TO ORDER r(/dlt. ( -(1
A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flail. .Wit�Y q
B. Roll Call: Biquer , Dahl 1'roet , W�
S:hlosser_, and M elt •
C. Appra,al of Minutest November 16, 1983
January 4, 1984
January 24, 1904
2. ANNOUNCEMENT:
A Vtdnerday, February 3, 19840 7 :00 P.M. — PLANNING
COMIISSION MEETING, lions Park Community Center.
B. Tharsday, Febrwry 16, 1984, 7:00 P.M. — CITY
COUNCIL /FIRE DISTRICT BOARD MEETING, Lions Park
6-1munity Center,
C O'aday, February 16, 1904, 7100 Pm. — PARK ADVISORY
1CM`117M, Lions Pork Community Canter,
D. Inu sday. Fnbtuur, 2, 1984, 7:00 P.m. — HISTORICAL
r.OMUSSION, Lions ?ark Community Center.
rhu'aday, rebruary 23, 1984, 7130 p.m. — CITIZENS
ADVISORY fOMHISSION, Lions Park Co ®unity Center.
n
01ty Council Agecde
-2'
February 2, 1984
E
3, CONSENT CALENDAR
rho follovlog Consent Ce lender
file Coe and non- controverslal, .rnitema
[he Councll at one are expected to be
time v![hout discussion be acted upon by
A, Approval of Warrants, Reglater Nos. 84_2_
ending 1/10/84 for the to cal amount of $SI,OSnd Payroll
B• Approval to Increase Seer =red revenuts for Plan
Checking $163.964 end
Community by the same amount. also Engines
rin8 Conc cart
Servl Services Contract c transfer 61200 from
ces Travel and Heart ng Accounts It to Y
Communit
C• Pervlra to aim No• CI84- gainst the Cl
[y by Sharon
Pepe the Cf[
handling. Attorney and tneu ranee Ce rtler �R
D• Alcoholic Beverage A of
Bear 6 Wine Ea tl Application Ko, AB g4-
Elks Ledgs No, ng Place Llc sees for chat for On -Sole
2570, 12481 Base Llne Road, Elks Club,
E• Alcoholic Beverage Appllca[lon No, qg 84-
MI
Beer .d Wtne par ln8 Place Lteenso, Conner talc ��Sale
Irvin 03 for
8 T. Ta8ue, 9375 Archibald , Suite Al clines, '
P, Approval of 108.
See urity for aprovement Agvoemont end In
6909 Amethyst 4venue, dove lopment )
located at
RESOLUTION N0. 84 -24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 12
CITY OF NCAMONL'
APPROVING IMT.ROVECAM 4, CALIFORNIA,
ZMPR DIVE opMENT SELTIRITY FOR A SINGLE FAMILY
LOPMENT LOCATED AT 6969 AMETHYST
AVENUE,
C• Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract
AS reem�n[ for property located on Strang by Alexander and P and tten
Joyce Frazln. 8 Lane submitted lv
RESOLUTION N0, 84_25
CITESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL 19
REAL PROPERRTTYNO CUCCAMONGA, ACCEPTING �A
LIEN M,REEMENT FROM VEHENT CONTRACT AND
FRAZIN AND AUTHORI2IAL, AND JOYCE
CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SANEE MAYOR AND
LANE). (8817 SrUIC
City Council Agenda -3- February 2, 1984
0 H. Release of Bonde: 21
OR 80 -34 - Located on the northwest corner of Lemon and
Haven Avenues; owner, Woodhaven Properties.
Faithful Performance Bond (Rood) $43,200.00
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IHPKOVEHENT FOR
D.R. 80 -34 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TILE WORK.
TRACT 9638 - Located at the northwest corner of
Archibald and Lemon Avenues; owner. Crismer Development
Corporation.
Monumentation Bond $ 2,450.00
4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
. A. ANNEXATION NO. 1 FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS NO. 1 AND 2 - Or et ng the work in connection
with HaaCntenance[rlct No. 1 for Tract Noe. 12023,
12024, 12025, 12184, 11173, 11173 -1, 11144, 12237,
12237 -1, 12305, and Maintenance District No. 2 for
Tract Not. 12184, 12237, 12237 -1 and 12237 -2. ,toff
report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PMCHO CUCA40NGA ORDERING THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 1
TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. I AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S
REPOIT FOR TRACT NOS. 12023, 12024,
12025, 12184, 11173, 11173 -1, 11144,
12237, 12237 -1, 12237 -2 and 12305.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFDERINC THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEX %TION NO. I
TO STREET LIGMfING HAINTENANLE DISTRICT
NO. 2 AND ACCEP "ING THE FINAL LBGINEER S
REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12184, 12237.
12237 -1 and 12237 -2.
23
24
32
EM
City Council Agenda -4- February 2, 1984
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - 52
An amendment to Title 14 of t e Rancho Cucamouga
Municipal Code, Section 14.20.110 of Chapter 14.20,
Signs, to change the maximum height limit fov a wall
sign on an Industrial building from 20 feet to a height
not to project above the rooflino. 9taiL.,zepoct�by
RI ck%ft-3a^Ctt y..Y Immnarr
ORDINANCE 65 -C (second reading) 52
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE F `
CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AHBNDING
CHAPTEk 14.20, SECTION 14.20.110 OF
TITLE 14 OF TILE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE WHICH REGULATES SIGNS TO
ELIMINATE THE TWENTY (20) FOOT MAXIMUM
HEIGHT REQUIREMENT FOR WALL SIGNS ON
INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 53
BTi O1 - amendment to the Rancho Cuts mongs
Development Code, Title 17 of the Municipal Code,
amending Section 17.08.040.8 and 17.08.040 -C to require
e Conditional Use Permit for single family detached
dwellings lour than 900 square feet. Staff-- .rep.rr-by.
Bltk- COmrs�PlnWaC•
ORDINANCE NO. 211 -A (second reading) 53
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TILE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, _
AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08, TABLES
17.08.040 -8 AND C, OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE, TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
DWELLINGS LESS THAN 900 SQUARE FEET.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL_ ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -08
(TENTATIVE TRACT 1 5 5 - TRUAX - A change o zone rom
Medium Dan Residential -14 du /ac) to Low Medium
Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for a total development
subdivision of 16.5 acres into 123 lots, comprising 122
zero lot line units generally located on tho south side
of Arrow Highway, between Turner Avenue and Center
Avenue - APN :.09- 091 -10. 9taff�- report.iby- 81ok1amea,
Cltyi %genet.
City Council Agenda -5- February 2, 1984
0
ORDINANCE N0. 216 (second reading) 56
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CT -; OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 209- 091 -10
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW
HIGHWAY, BETWEEN TURNER AVENUE, AND
CENTER AVENUE FROM dEDIUf DENSITv
RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DU /AC) TO LOW MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC).
E. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - CALMARK DEVELOPMENT - HERITAGE
PARR SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING PROJ.CT - Approval o. a 58
Deva opLent Agreement between t e City of Rancho
Cucamonga and Cal mark Development Corporation for
Heritage Park Senior Citizen Housing Project located
vest of Archibald, north of Base Line, item continued
from January 18, 1984 meeting. Staff report by Rick
Gomez, City Planner.
ORDINANCE NO. 217 (first reading) 59
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
S CUCAMONGA. CAL'- FORNIA, APPROVING A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND CALMARK
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
5. NON- ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT .DISTRTCT 82 -2. Recommend BI
apprcv -1 or --[lone neteeaery [o It
ate proceedings
to formation of AAsesoment District 82 -2 and approval
of plans, specifications, Engineer's Report and fixing
the dame for protean hearing for March 21, 1984. Staff
report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -19 88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO ?NIA,
COVERING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION AND
ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT ON
SAID IMPROVEMENT.
RESOLUTION NO. 94,20 -Ott -,� 89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE �l
® CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
PASSING ON THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER,
GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING
A TIME AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING.
City Council Agenda -A- February 2. 1984
RESOLUTION NO. E4-Zi= '�-'r -„?0 91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A REPORT UNDER THE "SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND
MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931 ", AND
FIXING A DATE OF HEARING THEREON.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -22 93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT BONDS TO FINANCE IMPROVEMENTS
IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT.
B. DAY CREEK C0IDIUNITY PACILITIES ACT DISTRICT. 95
Remo utiun o Intention to of airing nn [ e calling
for an election to form a Community Facilities Act
District to construct portions of Day Creek Channel.
Hearing date to be set on Retch 7. 1984. Staff report
by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -29 118
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL REVOLVING FUI'D
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING FOR CERTAIN
COSTS AND EXPENSES RELATING TO A
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT.
RESOLUTION N0. 84 -30 119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING PROPERTIES
AND LAND TO BE SERVED BY CERTAIN PUBLIC
CAPITAL FACILITIES IN A COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -31 • 120
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO
LEVY A SPECIAL TAX TO PAY FOR CERTAIN
PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN SAID COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT.
City Council Agenda -7- February 2, 1984
RESOLUTION N0. 84 -32
124
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONG4. CALIFORNIA,
ORDERIN -T AND DIRECTING -THE ?REPARATION
OF A FINAL 'REPORT' FOR A COHHUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT.
RESCLVIION NO. 84 -33 125
RESOl:U'iI0 OYTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS
SECURED BY SPECIAL TAKES TO PAY FOR
CERTAIN FACILITIES IN A COHHUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT.
C. APPROVAL OP CONDHN
EATION AGREFYENT KITH R.C. LAND CO. 127
Construct on o Train ng Levee Provia
Protection for Tracts 11934, 02044, 12045, and 12046.
Approval 's recommended of agreement with R.C. Land Co.
to cover all cocts involved in the condemnation of
lands required fur the conutruction of a flood
protection trainift levee. Staff report by Lloyd
Hubbs, City Engineer,
6. CITY HANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A PROGRESS RE1'ORi ON STANS OF EFFORTS OF ETIWANDA
HISTORICAL SO IETY - An ore report w1 _ e Riven y
Jaces In regards Lo the relocation of the
Chaffey- Garcid House.
B. EKPIRATION OF TPR4S OF OFFICE ON PAR CCtMITTEE. the
Term ?[C or Lsa lie Riggs and Pam Henry on the
Parka Committee expired on January 20, 1914.
9. ADJOURNMENT
7
I
!
I r
r
I r
r
r
fI
I
r
r
r r
r
r
z
I :r
0
z
r
ry
i w
i
W N O� y N Su it 450 Lp V ° VTn_r ..
i V WN V
W V 6Y U..V 6 .t e 4n iV NO{ �VNN O� n \G t 6UV
5: =iZ. Y °U
Y. 'JUWrV C. ��" �6VU6f
p(_ �: SSi�� ,��� t Zn_ -Cti . QII U�U} L
i >V OY i N VWr °IJ t tYV CI°w 6�i
Myna,
5� J3 JN °W3 Y Xn,3N _
V ypyL.. pliZ .rY.Y.L° S°Yri'i 6+WJV YiiWJ LYY�
W '> YW - WJY WW -nif�� M L Y[✓:I .. � J V rUWY V ,JSS+�
82 0Y JO OrN S tiN.�Mr a VY.a 1YONp V> Y Sf'JIS• .O'•O SOn
1 W tiariW O 'f YYN 'J�Pi f - ON.frl.�'L -t2 VL O?- .OYn ^..NLiWV�Y� ^YO \iJJVMr
V {6f.W UNW WVY V.► _ JJY�fVYf WrrnJJr JNW�'. JYO
p( YN�s y�yy y Zti6rV�.� tJ FtW'Jrt=N'J V�MJ.` Y
> y�y1V °Ztf "Y {tY >UYW ZSZC°�SJ. .YU.r13Wrt_C_°_° °SY
Jr °V��t -b
{ _ <f + \.1. \Of OOCVWVWLMJW0000000pWUV SN�.'rYY..J..it StYii LSG {YGG {p0.6C
COOOI.O..INNONOoOp +V ON9Vi ea +:a °O.^.I^� +NV..^ °N�PO WU� +h �. ^ +I =CwO +NO ^M °��.�.V° ^OM.�w °f -O�tw
Q= �Oa.N•Mn.M.a.�O O� °
Y i iii> oo° oiwv° �. n--.+. vw«^..'.^^"•" y'."^'^'^"'^"""+ a+ aaa++' faaow+asanl.nnr+r+- .��+.- nnnn°w i i F.° n°^ r.° O+ .Y..im°£rr °QwWr°O.w. °rv°�r°•cnn ° rw�«: Y. F. f4° nn.? m°.°• w °Fw°`v. °�°. °nni% °n.°w °�i°n °n °n ° ° °nF: °nn.�. °n9.°rP.°w°
(J-
mm000anow-o......oevonoowuooc ^woop000 o..N- owoeo- POw0000 -
Nowooec. I000�a eomnr- �� +eor�onwoapoveornc8 Qmmo w�N.e ±�0001.�......... e
rro +'.�ehoMa- oh ^g��Nh�e- aoeM1OeMOe.. woe ... o...crvn�w�Nrao ^
^ �.. hah -omP Cao P.�r a+ +hown PNw Nn h .^
i New aro ♦n-h r a P h a
.x
m -
� o
0
w
°
0
s
v
Q
s
y
Q
}
}C.
l
a I
V
3 0
o
z
f >
6
�l Or^ -e orrno= wOnrON0000NwNO00OONOONO.V MC ...............
t .w.`c oNn�.cn rlmeorw.opwoPnmrw a..www...umoemomcPPraPa rPP°Pe000yo°p-
g'iR Y ...............OµiMVP pPOPSP�SIPOPIpPVPPYVPPPOYYI N POPOPINYPSYIYII>
l
V ..FOO- hN.Ne^mP}hR.N.O..M OrhNM MOP O•W..m aI.mOO�M.NMOTO -hN M.I.lPO^M.NO
e � w = cT -mOemt 1110 —� -• pO P�P�- NOOp°00p 00pO ^. ^_
° N°, Qr°„ F�°. n° i •w°.°.n.3M.'°.h w92=0 =0 =nM 1pN . hhN0 ph.'I�M'.M/I•'.�rt.p�'��p.'n✓'.wh
.^M�'�.I1aa1♦
000o cooNONeµHNOONNO�
Q
or
• !
0
0
0
_1 I +
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 1 -9 -84
TO: Lauren Wasserman
FROM: Harry Emp;e \ �
SUBJECT: 83 -84 Budget�Adjuustnents
A quantum leap in Building activity hce causal an increase
in work load for all Departments, most notable is the plan check
activity in Engineering In fact the expenditures for plan
checking has exceeded the amount budgeted by some $80,000. By
the same token plan check revenues are well ahead of the estimated
Budget and surely will surpass the estimate for this fiscal year
by a considerable margin. Therefore, in order to bring this
activity in line with the actual transactions I would like to
recommend to Council that they approve an increase In the estimated
revenues for plan checking by $163,964 and a corresponding increase
In contract sonllces in Engineering of the some amount
The request is not for an increase but a simple shift in
funds already appropriated It will have not effect on the Budget
bottom line whatsovever save to better define expenditure needs
This adjustment is to transfer $1,200 from Community Service's
Contract account to - $400 for Community Services Travel 6 Meetings
account and $800 to Community Services Travel 6 Hearings account in
Recreation.
CLAIM FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY t _
I, Claims for death , Njury to person, or to personal property rt*sflsff(<cV VoEl*er than
100 days after the occurrence (Gov Code, Sec 911 2)CI1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C I C7
ADMINISTR: TION
Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than I fLs yv occurrence
(Gov Code, Sec 911,2) I ��
/y AM F*
TO: CITY OF &W,y0 L- UCA!iiGN/6s9 71819111IOlgili218t91318
r._r�„�to v 2 r - E•rc>7 .5YW -elile 1we 7g'77'P
Name of Claimant Address Zip one Hge
S9a� .Sirir�nu ,1,,..- .F�cr�Lara,,,nto...sa O,� 9i�e1
/ddrest o white Claimant wis es noticas sent. '--
WHEN did damage or injury occur? 12sa ry,f454e aT
WHERE did damage or injury occur? d0gV.&,' /5&—
i
HOW and under what circumstances did dcmpge pr Injury occur?
THAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or Injury?
(Include names of c •ployees, If known)
WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofvr as It way be known
at the time of the presentation of this claim, tcgether with the basis of computation of the amount cinimed:
(Attach estimates or bills, if possible) �
W4
�6i)ip A-.x �r ✓wt a IJS�i {n+. ,�C GyyG_5 -4n2 '151`
S 9'i 9j
Total Amount Claimed: $ .2 Q /, 9.-P
NAMES and addresses of witnesses, Doctors and Hospitals:
COPY
-
1] ArI..M el.w. IN rel M �.^el« -0" a ..'W k..W p.Y«. ..II b...P Ay erlMw+w N . 4.+w. r1
qc�
rY. rw� -M.NI Y�
M/Y llwrr nYn lYt►.�ar .w.W
4pftMM t Pad AL40"LIC 0[1714"
I
1171US1 OP uctwSt
IeE n0.
7www")
Y•. .1 .�. Y �... Y.I ..I'�'i�'Y .1 ...w..Y ..... V ww A ti ..r
Nan NO.
MR TALL OLRLRAL
i �..... �.rw...
%.TI40 PGCL
C001
TS. rA.rl.«1tw4ye,}. A.
By TUNSn%*R R E C 1
[. e
4.elw iMeiMrfM.w
t IMPLICATE
I.M
]. Iuewu Of AW..LVOt0
um Ia. 1222
OR�
.,/ e
LshelteA Rulet- CAAelee RAeene
1 T]MfSI O] rlu.c lxt1
111 lK
4
QChenge to 47 110.00 77
Pfenleee to Preeteee• 100.00
7
•
-
1] ArI..M el.w. IN rel M �.^el« -0" a ..'W k..W p.Y«. ..II b...P Ay erlMw+w N . 4.+w. r1
r N 1. M««.� N M N.i1 N AM.c.4 Mw CwrrN
13 STAte OF CNVOUM CY.I N —r A0. �6Lmtdll� ....__.._M._.�_— ]�17.'.BA..__.
'� � �
Y•. .1 .�. Y �... Y.I ..I'�'i�'Y .1 ...w..Y ..... V ww A ti ..r
1 UIUCAM
SM:N n[t! �.LLLTJ.O.'Y.L.1217J _ �.. �. ...._.........._........_.._... .
1 —.
By TUNSn%*R R E C 1
IP StAil a ulpbeA Cwn.] M_ ....,eiead•r,to-- ft�a•1tt.._"•
I111r.te Nlkw.Y10 17 oNtln....l.l IL-E:IIre«(e
.,/ e
®
Ii IYeA.. M.Jr. CMtN IIfCW C.++I
.. fb_. • .. e.f 1]!77 >• Mteer4l �_
Oh AN ]PAN irhr MI Llrl Pr dPr ✓•r1 UN WP •
0 t.v/r..Ar
�M.....
O .T. CpR7 MArttII W 'fa7j,l_
O h....s M•1770.i61.N'1_ ban-; .IFnsedlm•— ab.�_— •SY11!et-x'Pe' w 1(*.Z:a- 7�•-�—
,
L
L.J
Ym
I
I'
7451
,t�+sl
I En;d.+t
I
' , aeu6Le,u S.x-
[ PJA POD
i
TAUS W Esr
I
I
I
I W,.IC
fnuL
I
sE
I
� N
-r!t US CLuL Is LOCHTCD cu de �-,Our"'De eF J345 -'Lue
'2OAD gfjo L,tA.•ieL,? IIi M,L, Wesr oG ET wAAJD,;- AWAJUc
L' usddlA)T' 2oo),u6 0
.atutCAC RAU %
�'.JCiout4,uE r�ReOl�
C,i,jtd L 7(mu o
4og 2d -3o -Du,%Acgt
dtr6Al3ot dooD CeMW12C„7C '>
Natal I pIF ,4 -a,J �r lAede ! Co>r mewa9c
EAST J Se,nill M J- ,JZ1/5 Mae -
S..rA J ,ursr/ N O-so Des AV&
q
P
•
r-
-r!t US CLuL Is LOCHTCD cu de �-,Our"'De eF J345 -'Lue
'2OAD gfjo L,tA.•ieL,? IIi M,L, Wesr oG ET wAAJD,;- AWAJUc
L' usddlA)T' 2oo),u6 0
.atutCAC RAU %
�'.JCiout4,uE r�ReOl�
C,i,jtd L 7(mu o
4og 2d -3o -Du,%Acgt
dtr6Al3ot dooD CeMW12C„7C '>
Natal I pIF ,4 -a,J �r lAede ! Co>r mewa9c
EAST J Se,nill M J- ,JZ1/5 Mae -
S..rA J ,ursr/ N O-so Des AV&
q
r« oM.+ w N ak./✓•I Sw Co"
CO a= GIDEmw
I G a
Irolr....+n gn Bernardino
j�pyy,Y6
COOS
OUPLIGA.Fb
�-
rd..+.. «M"•
:.wwcaAMKANIn
h/ 8Y -cam
ALUWzzl INC.
_!5 p�guu
1Or '.� /na
Mw.wa...
Gu=TAid
rr,W T. Tag",, Ch,1XVea OZ tn. –
l rmn or rw[urno.fn
In m1 8
ilfLlzd J. NOOK
100.00
_ .. 1
a
N chlb -ld,4 Lli [M
.sfdibnld[ ..u1N 'in
C./
W.r rv.wr�Mr In nm� casd �b r nO+VVw M M Or�""[.I M
r.W• «10w�.«. «r..rA[AJ.SMO..w.l .. "NM.[.p41. *........
1. M...K
13 Steil O/ UWO�.A f«nry • "'
H \ _ � r rr✓. . ��� n , � y W w ^...!rte ^'. �..w�
�Cwa"^A�it IIILLLLI�~
14 AM .................
__ ....... .......................�• -•r��r
A ► /IICATION /Y YlAN5FIR0l
It SIAM V C1pIClfAA fw.1/ N ......... ....:.. '......••••.••••.• . w ..
..rte r.r.. r..... ��^ • y..— �......... w ^M_.� � � M ^i . ' :•w
. r ,..I'.�~.r�r �....+ � _ ••� i ... �: a ....^.w. r.+�l.....� r r.
...�.. r.rr �.+/.1 r.u.r Mr•. ��..N. IR ll[�M Miw.�� /'
ink O.N.Ww& F p...rtw...I Uw 11\IF
..Iwr3 O k.a+.w..
❑ : ^_°
J [
L
J
A
iI I iifCU6rt.rlL = e»+r'thc
I I
6� '�rPCer
t I
I 1
I
I�
Ik ,
I ,
A
@AU (.ir FoemeN, n
ErirSoU
AQ�AlcnnrR.
93it
F, 1 0
Ue5z rr LFus,m s C,,e
&)A3CGTAr Q. AebueS, `EA4 rs LocArED oAA tKe A1,57 -srbe
of Ae M,QALD Aueuue AP✓Qoxrar7reLt 3,06 4reT 5ouri
Of lg3Tteer
WJ-T� rA, the Ai2Ct4leP,ure14 CmitTeu,
�utlrtuT foWA aL rebWkry 1Allu,7rnA� SP(elt'iC TLAnI
5ubat'en �''1- GecvvnC ?uDnr�rrK
t' WIIA SV/)&d4VIA)612o%r'rifI _ IJI9Td /SS P --D hlO.e'!R °`r%
E kS J/r/ rr .r rr
wesr /Ss7 -5n bf ,4-oli6
SuDUsne,ot Xele
CeNe,VAL R Ml — - Fh7e RS AgoUe
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1984 1777
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for a
single family development located at 6969 Amethyst Avenue
Mr. Charles Roberts has submitted the attached bands and agreement to
guarantee the construction of off -site improvements on Monte Vista and
Amethyst Avenues adjacent to his property at 6969 Pmethyst Avenue These
improvements are being done in conjunction w16h the issuance of a building
permit.
bonding amounts are as follows:
Faithful Performance Bond: 56,600.00
Labor and Material Bond $3,300.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that pity Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same
Respectfuily submitted,
LSH:6K:jaa
Attachments
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR
6969 Amethyst Avenue
rte_
G
J
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PPESE'ITS: That this agreement Is
made and entered Into, In conformance with the provisions of the
Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of Callfernla, a eucicipal corporation, hereinafter referr-
ed to as the C'ty, by and between said City and Cnarlet Roberts
here I nafter referred to as the Developer
THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer destres to develop certain
real property In said City located at the northeast corner of
Monte Vista and Amethyst; and
WHEREAS, said city has established certain requirements
to be not by said Developer at prerequisite L- grarting cf firal
approval; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and pasting of .....
impro•enent security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the
City Attorney, are deemed to be equlvalert td prior coop atlon of
said requl rumen is for the purpose of securing said approval
NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed by and between the
City and thi Developer as follows:
1 The Developer hereby agr••a to construct at
developer's expense all Improvements described an page 4 nereof
vlthln 12 months from the date hereof
2 Th't agriement shall be effective an the date of the
resolution of Ja Council of Said City approving this
agrvemant This .greement shall be in default on the day follow -
Ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless ,.n exten.
sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid-
ed
0 The Developer may request addit lil.0 tilt In which
to Complete the previsions 0/ this ag remnant. In wrttint not lets
then 30 days prior to the default date and Including a ciatemant
of circumstances of necessity for additional time In considera-
tion of such request, the CI ty reserves the right to •evlev the
provision- hereof, Including construction standards, cost
estl""a' and sufficiency of the ' ^010 -errant security and to
require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes
therein
4 If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with
the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right
at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any law-
ful meant, and thereupon t0 recover from said Developer and /or
his Surety the full cost and expense Incurred In so dalvg
S Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel-
oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any
wort within the public right -of -way, and the developer shall
conduct such wort In full compliance with the regulations
contained therein Non - compliance lay result In stopping of the
wore by the City, and assessment of the pcnaltles provided
6 Public right -of -way Improvement work required shall
be constructed In conformance with approved Improvement plans,
Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special
anendmants thereto. Construction shall Include ay transitions
®
and/or other incfde,�ll work deemed necessary for drainage or
pubs lc safety Err t or amalssions discovered during construC-
rte_
G
J
C,
E
lion shall be corrected upon the direction of the City
Engineer Revised wort due to said plan modifications shall be
covered by the brow of this agreement and secured by the
sr -a tY sovering the original planned works
7 Work done within eals;ing streets shall be diligent-
ly pursued to coapletlan; the City shall have the right to
complete any and all work in the avant of unjustified delay In
completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the
Developer andlir his contractor -yy any lawful means
B she Developer shall be responsible for replacemeirt,
reloutlons, or removal of any component of any Irrsgatlon w:er
system In conf lift with the required work to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer and the owner of the water systen
9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of
all loose rock and other debris from the Dpbllt -Ight -of -way
10. The Developer shall plant and naintaln par,way
trees as directed by the Community Development Director
11 The improvement security to be furnished by the
Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreemert
shall be subject to the approval of 'be City attorney The prin-
cioal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than
the amount shown:
Al q
FAITHFUL PER;DAMAMCE
Principal ARRUnL: 56,600 00
Type:
Name and address of Surety:
MATERIAL AND L
Pr ABOR Incl0 al Amount: f7,300 00
Type:
Name and address of surety:
CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATIOM
Principal Aaoant n/a
Type:
HMe and address of surety
TO BE PGSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE By THE CITY
IM MITMC55 HEREOF, the Parties hereto here Caused these
pre IN
to De duly eaecuted and actnoxledge with all forRSllties
re0ulred by tax on the dates tit forth opposite their figratures
/U- Is.Knl' i Dava toper
Date L by—�'� wcu ra
Charles Roberts
Accepted
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal IPornla
A NYp ICIP&I Corporation
Mayor
By
Attest. ty /
AOprov <d: q y
J
TiTi.£ INSUP.IWC£
TICOR
II
tTAT[Ol Ut1.OR \IA
STXIE
K
,,,, V Or
plow Te
♦1 l aua ln� tPR
—
—
�lvnm..uw.w
x...am w.. nx e... rluW.n wawa +,o .e. � r - Ar>"��•.(v
,re
Y�i�� .wa 4.wxW1,.a NnalxJ
m!
1
I"s
tv.hM
J
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMPIGA
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
EMCAO7CHRENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
For IYyrovecent of: Aretill and Monte Vista
Date: 1/5/64 input( ea by:_1. martin
File ATerencs:
o 1 vst City Dxg• No,
NOTE: DNS not include tumnt Fee for
Nritln9 permit or pavement deposlts.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITE31 14TTTY- 1'1417 UNIT COST
S ANOINT
P.C.C. Curb - 12' C.F
P.C.C. Curb - 6' C.F 132 t.F 6.00
792.00
P.C.C. Curbb
only 6' C.F.
C
t )
a P.C.C.
4
$Idaal 460 S.F 1.75
605.00
6' Moe ApproWl 206 S.F. 2.50
515.00
6' P.C.C. Cross Gotta, 425 S.F 3.40
1.445.00
+
Street Excavation
]sported Ebb lnkment
Preparatlon of Solq ace
+
Crushed Aggregate base (per In, thick) 2230 S.F 15
371,50
+
A.C. 2230 S.F 55
1.226.50
A.C. (gOp to 1300 tons)
:+
A.C. (under 500 is 9DO tans)
A.C. (under 500 t+as)
Patch A.C. (trerr',)
+
I' thick A.C. ,,erlay
!
Adjust sever Whole to grads
Adjust Sever -leas out to grade
"Just to grade ! EA. 75.00
75.00
Llgn,svDVes
Street Slgnf
Street Trees
Parkvp LWSCIPI and Irrigation
Raw r11 cf A.C. Pavement IWO S F .35
735.00
E
Re30v41 of A.0 61 ra 60 L.F 1.D0
60.00
CONSTRUCTION COST _ 56.006,00
CONTINCENCY COSTS S 600.00
'
TOTAL C04STRUCTIO4 16.6-18.00
FAITNM PERFORMANCE SURETY (LOOS) $6.600,00
LA60R AND MATERIAL SECURITY (50%) _ S3.300.00
FRGINEERING INSPECTION FEE S 330.00
'RESTORATION /DELINEATION CASH DEPOSIT S SOO.00
(REFUNDABLE)
MONIME(FIAT10 SURETY (CASH) n/a
*Pursuant to City of It n o Cueaaonga Nsnlclpal Code. Title I, Chlpter 1.06,
ldopting San eernardlne County Code Titles, Chapterf 1.5
cash
restoration /delineation daposlt shall be made prior to Issuance
of an
Englneering Cosktrbctlon Permit.
4.
RESOLUTION N0. f12- 9YO�t�
! A RESOLUTION OF THE CI pPpRUYING M ROVEMENT OAGREEEMENT
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
D IMPROVEMENT AMETHYST AVENUE SINGLE FAMILY
O
DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
far the improvement described
California, h1984 for
by its con ideratlsn as developerent Agreement execute on
wa adjacent to the real Property specifically
February I, the northeast corner of Monte Vista and
public right -of- !
therein, and generally located at
Amethyst Avenues, and improvements 1s to be done 1n
described in said
e
WHEREAS the and subject to the terms the installation of such P
thereof,
Improvement A5 r ent of said real property; and
conjunction with the
development accompanied by
good ands sufficient Imyrovementt Se urity, whichcuisd identifte to said
Improvement Agreement. Of
NOW, THEREFORE, BE it RESOLVED by the City CouncAeanditsaid
a Callfornia, that said herebyv approved Agreement and the Mayor is
Rancho ent S ng , be and the same are the City of
Improvement Security reemere on behalf of
herby authorized Land the City Clerk to attest thereto.
Rancho Cucamonga, 1984,
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of February,
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M Wasserman, iy er
jaa
on :e s, ayor
r �-
0
0
CITY OF RANCHO CMUMO \GA
@ ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP N
pan
Pose 1 oP 1
1{
13
s
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
E :'A FF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Kral, Engineering Technician
� n
c
O +y O
A
Z
U1 7
1977
SUBJECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreenent
for property located on Strang Lane submitted by Alexander and
Joyce Frazin
Alexander and Joyce Frazin have submitted the attached Lien Agreement to
guarantee the future construction of Strang Lane in connection with the
Issuance of a building permit in accordance with City Council Resolution No.
80 -38.
Strang Lane is a private, paved road which allows legal access to the
property An Irrevocable offer to dedicate 30 feet for future roadway has
also bee. submitted by the developer.
RECOMMENDATION
It Is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing
the Mayor and C'ty Clerk to sign same
Respjctfully submitted,
i
LBH:6'.Jaaa
Attachments
I
u
RECOROIRG REQUESTED lit.
and
NNER RECORDED NNIL 10%
CITY CLE RFNCNO CUCANONBA gj710
PIT0 0001 807 CALIFORNIA
RANCHO CUCANONGA.
CONTRACT ARO LIEN FBREENENT
vaO?E t �a�E �Nn"' "r% L >N t• �Cy O.Y
REAL colt y�-
and ante Into
bade by and between Alexander
THIS AGREEMENT 19 sj'k• ar'1. and
In after referred to of Develop
of rexln inert t aunlclPai
corporet /on
end Joyce F CALIFORNIA. es folio-s°
0.ANCN0 CU LPMOXGA. city.).
Dror Idea
tot C111 0: to as sltar referred to 'he
(herein precedent
0.EA5, as s gene, al t0rOR10q 1e is " residence
den
NNE for i^ off -
tding Par01t Of gist ln9
OT t LN "Attr uct Ion in
building
I.... ote City requ{rc0 utter. esDh alt paving
""I o,tr bet IaDrorea an is f` ^^t LiO^gtnt -Or ODartY to Oe to +a leDed;
d a9purten an
wore ed1 t
and t0 postpone constructlon
dr Oef lrts by the
j1 a Uter date. of deteralnad
1 NE0.EP5. the Oercloi
Of such NDroraanntt unt
City, and sucn Do"Poneaent
RNE0.EF5. the City If
agreeable t0 cant requiring
taper enters into to It A9rae to
that tna Deve recants.
at na asp -so
Provide d eruct fsle l.pra A ,Ocaent
to cons d0 fe by the CItY. wnlch said 9
tnr DeretoDer I.Drov beer es
one city. r demand -the city -ay co estruct said
it of to the CITY
Provide that neglects t0 DO t0 and that
dell alto Dror er deter l0 ee at
if the Der toper fails ne real property hartlna,^ar
snail ogre a Ilan uDOn t
and Y replysent due
s.cv,ltY far the Oeraloper's Derf araence.
city
I'
1
0
NOW, THEREFORE, VIE V1TIES AGREE:
1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will Install
Off -site street improvements Including curb, gutter, asphalt
paving and appurtenant work In accordance and compliance with all
applicable ordinances resolutions rules and regulations of the
City In effect at the time Of the installation Said
Improvements shall be Installed upon and along Strang Lena
2 The Installation of said Improvements shall be
completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to
the Developer from the City to commence Installation of the
same Installation of said inprovmentt shall be at no expense to
the City.
y In the event the Developer shall fall pr re• a to
. coaplete the installation of said Improvements in a tingly
Manner. City MAY at any time thareafter, upon giving the
Oevelorsr written notice of its Intenticn to do so, enter upon
the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements
and recover all cosh of completion Incurred by the City from the
Developer
g"N /eel- a y/ -set
e To secure the performance by the Cc eloper of the
terms ane condltlons of this Agreement and to secure the
repayment t0 City Of •my funds which may be expended oy City In
cnopleting said Improvements upon default by the Developer
hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain,
sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described
real property situated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit:
All that certain real property located In the County of San
Cereardlro, State of Calfornla, described as follows:
IFA
The Easterly 150 feet of the Westerly 870 feat Of the South 1/2
of all that portion of Lot a, Block Ili Lucamonga Homestead
VIP
As ration Lands, as per map recorded In Book 6, Page e6 of
Naps Records o/ said County. lying Southerly of a line drawn
p+r.1lel to th. Northerh line of said Lot, the Northwesterly
corner of raid parcel being at a point e0ui- d1stant from the
Nerthvatt corner and the Southwest corner of said Lot.
g"N /eel- a y/ -set
■
•
7} 1
S This conveyance Is In trust for the purposes
described above
d Nor, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully
perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this
Agreement, then this conveyance Snell be void, otherwise, it
shall rem0ln In full force and effect and In all respects shall
be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and
the rights end obligations of the parties with respect thereto
soil; be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the
State of California, and any other appllcauie statute, pertaining
to mortgages on real property.
7 This Agreement she)) be binding upon and shall Inure
to the benefit of the heirs, eaecutors, administrators,
s',CCessors and '&signs of etch of the parties hereto
8 To the extent regulred to give effect of this
Agreement as a mortgrgt, the term •Developer• shall be
•mortgagor• And the City shell be the -mortgagee- as those terms
are used In the the Civil Code of the State of California and any
other statute pertaining to mOrtages an reel Property
9 If legal action 's commenced to enforce any of the
Provisions of this Agreement, to recover any Sum which the City
IS entitled to recover fro. the Developer hereunder or to
foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover IIS costs Anon such re as anae la
attorneys feet a1 shall be awarded by the Court
1%
i
IN WITNESS NHEREO,,
the parties hereto have executed
\
this Agreement on the day and
year first above written
CITf ►
�
DEVELOPER
C1 TT OF 0.ANCN0 CUCAIIONGA,
".O
EALIFORNIA,
V _y
corporation
Mayor
—__�I
APrE•JTE, AS TO FCOd
ATTEST:
�� is, eg W4
sr
Lauren asman
s ar
'
Ci
City f.lert
ccrrsc;a,,y
ua...uxvvv.vveuuava,x..uaua..,
.•..uwuwa.U..... •xs•
STATE rF CALIFORNIA
ss
COUXTY OF SAN BEANAR JINO
On
,19 ,before
the un ers 9ne o ary u c,
ptrf boar y apDe are
personally known to me to be
the Mayor of the CITY OF AANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a sunlclpal corporation, and known to me
to be the person wno executed
the within Inftrutent CA behalf of
said municipal corporation,
and acknowledged to me that such
sunlclpal Corporatlol executed
it
WITNESS MT HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
Notary 9vtu•e
STATE OF CALIFORNIA I
COUNTY OF SAX BERMARDIMO ss
the un ars gne o aryl— u4'oTr persona y appeared
known to se o d e
parson l w ose name s, su s c r l bed to the within
instrument and 1ckA0wleged ai�i t — asecuted It
WITNESS NT HAND AND OFFICIft SEAL
Notary Signature
NOTE:WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP.
THE ABOVE JURAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE A CORPORATION /PAXINSRSHIP
uUCAT IS RETIUMD
Ni
8ti'`rt
y RESOLUTION NO. R
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
AND LIEN AGREEMENT FR9M ALEXANDER AND JOYCE FRAZIN AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
(8817 STRANG LANE)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted
Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requireme,its for building
Permit issuance, and
WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk snd pavement
established as prerequisite to Issuance of bui,ding permit fur 8817 Strang
lane has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agreement by Alexander and Joyce Frazin, a copy of which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that toe City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Prope -ty Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
P SSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of February, 1sd4
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren Wasserman, ty C erk
1aa
on a s, ayer
Z
r
*I
FI - -T Q yl ii+
..,.. I 13
I i, L /oe�l /a .rc•y�,� - - �ivuw: i�f:y
Si-� rfG l•Af --�
I
I� �:�oi�•Ll�b+
ur.
TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w
`` �,q17 Strann 1 n
ENGINEERING DIVISION �T
VICINITY NIAP 1 al p�gt laof 1 J
17
I y = -ic•i ��i `
-:+ ,
I� �:�oi�•Ll�b+
ur.
TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w
`` �,q17 Strann 1 n
ENGINEERING DIVISION �T
VICINITY NIAP 1 al p�gt laof 1 J
17
J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA&IONGA'
ESTAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engine
L
SUBJECT: Bond Release
O.R. 80 -34 - located on the Northwest corner of Lemon and Haven Avenues
OWNER: W000haven Properties
P. 0. Box 5526
Beverly Hills, California 90210 -0526
Faithful Performance Jond (Roan) 543,200.00
The road Improvements for the above referenced project have been
completed in accordance with the approved plans and it is recommended
that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion, and authorize the release of the Faithful
Performance Bond.
Tract 9638 - located at the northwest corner of Archibald and Lemon
Avenues
OWNER: Crismar Development Corp.
P. 0. Box 2131
Santa Mon'na, California 90406
Monumentation Bond S2,00.00
Certification from Madole ara Associates indicates that all final
monuments have: been set and they have been paid In full It is
remmended that City Council release the Monumentation Bond
ai
0
E
RECORDING REWESTED 81:
CI
IT he -•.ww CUCWKGA
P. 0. box M7
Rancho CueaxOngo, California 91770
WHEN RECOROED Itkll TO:
CITY CLERK
CIT1 OF RANCHO CUCANDM6a
P. 0. box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91770
NOTICE OF CCWLETICN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT
1 The undersigned Is a.: orpr of an Interest or estate In the
hereinafter described real property, tN ncturo err MIN Interest v estate
is:
o. a. so -IR
g. The full nap and address of the undersigned owner IS: CITY OF
RANCHO COCAMORGA, 90E0.0 DISC Line Road, P. 0. Boa 907, RanChO Cucam391,
q� Callf"Mia 91730.
.. On the 1st day of February, 159/, there ras cowpleted on the
Rere Hefter de.cribed real property the wrt of lattrorment set forth In the
contract documents for:
`•
O. R. 80 -34
c. The nom of the original cnntractor for ttA wrk of leprordeent
is a whole Ws:
9opdharen Properties
5 The roll property referred to herein is situated In the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, Cnunty of San Bernardino, California, " Is described as
follons:
o. R. 80.01
The location of said property Is the northwest corner of teeon
and Moran Avenue
CITY Of AMIN) CUCAMONGA, a
wnicipal corporation, Owner
a e - Lloyd a. ham s, City Engineer
*.N")-
94-x
RESOLUTION 110. 02- Oi -VSIA
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IKPROYEMENTS
FOR Q.R. 80 -34 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for D. R. BO -34 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Complet'n is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFOiE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer Is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
r1
U
PASSED, APPROI'£0, and ADOPTED this 1st day of February, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City CTer7
3aa
1
Jon 0. MikeM77a-yor
2.3
v
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
•
C .
V
1
i"
DATE:
February 1, 1984 U?
u
TO:
City Council and City Manager
FROM:
Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY:
Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT:
Ordering the Work in Connection with Annexation No. 1 for Street
Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 1 and 2
Attached
for City Council approval are resolutions ordering the work In
connection
with Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No.
1 and No.
2 for the following tracts:
DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2
Y
r er a (Local g t:
12023 12237
12024 12237 -1
12025 12237 -2
12184
11173
11173 -1
i
11144
a
12237
12237 -1
12237 -?
12305
The Engineer's Report for both Districts are also attached for final
approval.
These reports show the estimated costs of the Districts and Include
a location
map for each tract
Letters of
intent to join the Districts have been received from the developer
of each tract Letters have been sent to the developers, posting has been
completed,
and the Resolution of Intent has been placed in the Daily Report
`
Ne—naper
giving time and date of public hearing
,
d
a
continued
..... .....
1.+
aN
11
9
F
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Annexation No. I to Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 1 & No. 2
February 1, 1984
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
It 1s recommended that City Council adapt the attached resolutions ordering
the subject annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 1 and
No. 2.
Respectfully ,ubmitted,
v" //
0/lwp
LBH SK:Jaa
Attachments
•r
,I(.'
Adpi&
DEVELOPMENT, INC. 1'•
City ct Rancho Cucamonga
9319 Baseline Road, Suite C
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention Mr. tlarti.l
wrt 9% RAI.010 CUC ='0;ICI
EPSIt'EEWNB D:9'S'0'1
Re J9'.::IUG THE LANDSCAPE rtl: LIZ.71l' DISTRICT
Dear t'r : a ^ten:
This lette^ is tc nctif•: you tnat J:C. SC=, :l:C does
-erot; tcin the ..ardccap2 and lighting :istrict of the
.ty of ,Rancho Cucamonga as it relates to the development
of Tract _ ^337
Respectfully submitted,
I 6 SCCT',,,/,/�rtC
Richard . Scott, President
R::S:lmc
U
1111 WESTNINTN STREET . UPLAND CALIFORNIA91785 • 714.948•1B02
;�r,
e 0
SMARLOOROLIGH 0EVEL13Pa1EA7 CORPORAr10\
July 14, 1983
H
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9340 Baseline Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91101
Attention: Lloyd Hubbs
Re: Tracts 12021 through 12031
Gentlemen:
We agree to the inclusion of Tracts 12021 through 12031
in the city -wide Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District.
Very truly yours,
MAR DEVE "' CORPORATI011
Paul �nes
Vice President - Engineering
PUB /s1
ONE CENTURY PLAZA 2029 CENTURY PARK FAST SUITE 15:0 LOS AN.OS.ES CAVFOAV•A90087 (2101553.51 ?1
0 TOWN E. COUNTRY OEVELOPMENTS
March 8, 190
1ut1R . 0 1:2 i
M.R. JOE STOFFA Cpy OF RANCHO CUCO1.1011..1
City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 T '09
9320 C Baseline head
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Roi Tract 12184 - Letter of Intent
Dear Mr Stoffas
Please use this letter ae Town & Country Developments,
"Notice of Intention to join the Landscape and Lig! .-
ing District."
Very y�Zo
RCJshs
TCO 133 N. v P " O^�ew Cebf I w aasee (7141 GR7 307O
ONIdAdik
M. J. Brock & Sons, Inc
C913
GIe'"s 1LAnOSs
Greenbrar (anb Sure 771 Brca Ca 9 57!
7141
Ill 579BIA
July 15, 1993
Lloyd Hubbs
Engineering Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.o Box 007
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Tract Nos 11173 C 11173-1
t' 0
Dear Lloyd:
Please consider this letter our request for Inclusion in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga's Landscape Maintenance District No, 1 within whose
boundaries the above two referenced tracts Ile Additionally, we
request that your office send to us a latter with an estimated annual
Ycost
per individual lot owner within our project in order that our
sales personnel will have a somewhat accurate number to relay to our
prospective home buyers I believe that our lot owners will be paying
a somewhat reduced assessment because there Is a hon,ea hers association
for the project which will be maintaining perimeter landscaping which
falls within the resin of Landscape Maintenance District No I
should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
Thank you for your attention to this matter
Sincerely.
4:
P '
Les Thomas
4
Project Manager
;a
n
it
May 24, 1983
Mr. Lloyd Hubbs
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 1807
Rancno Cucamonga, Ca.,91730
Ref; Tentative Tract 111144
Dear Mr. Hubbs of
We are the developers
16 buildings totaling 62 units tone i approx. 514 n 0 acres located on
vineyard Ave. south of Foothill Blvd. in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Calif.
We agree to have the tract included in the "Gpecial Assessment
District' for landscape and the "Special Assassment District"
for lighting, as provided by the City of Pincho Cucamonga, Cal.
Sincerely,
Tac Development Corp.
c a ^/%. �/
/. L
Mr. T. A. Christenson
President
® hm;
3,
.733311ELULUNANS . IL IX CIIOCUCA .NIOXG,I.CALIPORXLa91730 • (714)989.1725-
M
I
r
DI
CHARLES ROY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
3401•A East ChaOinan Avenue
Orange. CA 92669
(714)633.0336
November 3, 1983
Cit) of Rancho Cucamonga
P G Boa Sri?
Rancho Cucamonga. Calif. 91730
Dear S-rs:
lte agree to the incorporation of our project "Alta Loma
hoods" T 1 12305 into the Ctt� Landscape and Lighting
Dittr:ctts)
O,,,rles Rot /
General Partner
Alta Loma floods Associates II
S/
gy
RESOLUTION NO 82v81= 0:iCR -"
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION
NO. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS.
12023, 12024, 12025, 1218, 11173, 11173 -1, 11144, 12237,
12231 -1, 12237 -2 AND 12305
WHEREAS, the City Council o' the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
4th day of Januarv, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 83 -227 to
order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 1 to Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 83 -227
was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by
law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of sold Resolution of Intention on
file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said
Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally
appears l frome them Affidavit of Postings said notices bean file qIn rthe boffice bf
the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after tite adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the
gesolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property
Proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of
Intention No 83 -227 according to the names and addresses of such owners as
e same
of Rancho aCucamonga ,twhI :hssaidicopiesrwerekduly mailed inttheltline, form,Cand
" manner as required by lav, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in
the office of the City Clerk; and
" WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence,
documentary, nd
concerningt enecssitycfornthehc ntemplatednworktandn thesbenefitsintoobe
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the
annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council
hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of
Intention No. 83 -227, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally
approved, ancr—
SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the
® Engineer's e porttaare hereby approved
3�
SECTION 4: The assessments shall not hegin until after 60 percent
of said tract�iave been occupied
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of February, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
jaa
11
Is
Jon 0 Mikels, mayor
35
0
0
E
Engineer's Report for
Street Lighting Maintenance District No 1
Annexation No 1
SECTION 1 Authority for Report
This report is In compliance with
1, Division 15 of the Streets and
iLardscaping and .ighting Act cf 1972)
SECTION 2 General Oescriotion
the requirements of Article a, Chapter
Highways Code, State of Califc,nia
This City Council h s elected to annex the tract! enumerated In Exhibit
"A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No 1 The City Council has
determined tnet the street 110111.5 to be maintained will have an effect upon
all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the
street lights
are Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usuel
ma I ntenance, operating and servicing of street `fight improvements on
arterial and certain collector streets improvement maintenance is
considerm of general benefit to all areas n the District and cost
shall be livided or a per lot basis In the case of condominiums
with ai space ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall
be considered to be -refit the same as a lot
SECTION 3 plain, find Specifications
The plain and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the
developers The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions
of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering
Divi,ion Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development
plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting
areas. The plans and specifications for st eet lignting improvement on the
individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent
as If said plans •nd specifics were attached hereto
Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district
Include: the repair, removal s replacement o all or any part of
any improvement, provlAing for the illumination of the subject area.
SECTION 4 Estimated Costs
No costs will be iecurred for street lighting improvement construction.
All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data,
It Is estimated tnat maintenance costs for asse "ment purposes will be as
indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be
based on actual cost data.
The estimated tots cost for Lighting MOL'te,,anc° District No. 1
(including Annexation No. 1 comprised of 463 lots and 16 9500L street lights
and 11 5600L lights) is shown below•
i'
1. S.C.E Maintenance and Energy:
No's
% 12
2. Costs per dwelling Unit .
8.41/year/unit
Total Annual Maintenance Cost ' 1515 8�•�.
No. of Un is n U strict
8,41 divided by 12 ' 0 70 /mo /unit
Assessment shall apply t0 each lot as explained to Section 6.
® SECTION 5 A ess,e his report and
Copies of the proposed Maintenance Otstrict ho. 1', Annexation No. 1
Assessment Diagrams are attache o
labeled 'Street Lighting
These 0laStree are hereby Maintenance within the text of this r'fper In
SECT.OrI 6 Assessment s general 'aenefttfo o each all
for the District are found to be of shall be equal parcel of
•mplovement per
lot or P
more than one dwelling unit D
dwelling units with to the District and that ds5 e55men
unit where there is the asses
assessable ^land ' dwelling units per r lot c or l parcel. parcel shall he proportional sment
tb the num. er o future developm
ent shall be annexed to the
it is proposed that all
District.
SECTION 7 Order of Events instituting proceedings
City Council adopts r.so jtion of Preliminary � of City Engineer's
1 preliminary
2 City Council adopts Resolution of
Report ntention to annex to District and sets
3 City Council adopts Resolution of I
public hear'ng data
3s
ate'*
----75—ant ty
Lamp tze'
8.75
�Sb L
56
58001.
'N gn
ressure od•um apor
Tom
Rate
Limos
9,979 20
% 9 90
84
'
5,880 00
56
% 8 75 % 12
No's
% 12
2. Costs per dwelling Unit .
8.41/year/unit
Total Annual Maintenance Cost ' 1515 8�•�.
No. of Un is n U strict
8,41 divided by 12 ' 0 70 /mo /unit
Assessment shall apply t0 each lot as explained to Section 6.
® SECTION 5 A ess,e his report and
Copies of the proposed Maintenance Otstrict ho. 1', Annexation No. 1
Assessment Diagrams are attache o
labeled 'Street Lighting
These 0laStree are hereby Maintenance within the text of this r'fper In
SECT.OrI 6 Assessment s general 'aenefttfo o each all
for the District are found to be of shall be equal parcel of
•mplovement per
lot or P
more than one dwelling unit D
dwelling units with to the District and that ds5 e55men
unit where there is the asses
assessable ^land ' dwelling units per r lot c or l parcel. parcel shall he proportional sment
tb the num. er o future developm
ent shall be annexed to the
it is proposed that all
District.
SECTION 7 Order of Events instituting proceedings
City Council adopts r.so jtion of Preliminary � of City Engineer's
1 preliminary
2 City Council adopts Resolution of
Report ntention to annex to District and sets
3 City Council adopts Resolution of I
public hear'ng data
3s
n
U
5171
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and
determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings.
5 Every year in Hay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and
approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments
i.
0 EXHIBIT °A'
0
1
Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No 1 of Street
Li;hting Maintenance District 1:
Tract No
No of Dwelling Units
Prteri-O Lights
12023
33
0
11024
34
0
12025
40
0
12184
32
0
11173 -1
70
5
11173
41
8
11144
62
2
12237
12237 -1
12237 -2
86
10
12305
59
2
aI
C,
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO. 1
TR 12023
TR 12024
TR 12325
w; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
n' I COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR�DINO A
' e
0j p STATB OF CALIFORNIA �T
c; 6 1; l
Im 1 1 Mn Y100! PITY
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
• STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO. 1
7R 12184 — - —
i • .1 . t
i s � --r~ [• ri f
r _
a
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title;
� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
r �
a i3 STATIC OF CALIFORNIA
Y -- y Date
ASSESSMEIT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO. 1
11173 6 11173 -1
� � 4
c�.r>
I,n
_ I I L,:,4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA — N
+
5
p •� .j p�•.y �� - .
c�.r>
I,n
_ I I L,:,4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA — N
•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I
ANNEXATION NO. t
Tit 11144
CITY OF RANC:i0 CUCAMONGA
M� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
M�3 ,3 STATE OF CALg'ORNIA
i cm� i LLOYD NUE05 CITY ENGINEER R CE238E9 DATE
•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO, t
_ s
m off® ,••. ® `,-
.1
i • �" �' Jam`
TRACTS 12237,
12237 -1 and
12237 -2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �
title,
.�� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO -
��STATE OF CALIFORNIA_ 1I1►�,�IT
fm LLOYD HUBS$ CITY ENGINE R RC 21849 DATE — 0' {e
t
u�
li •w
TRACTS 12237,
12237 -1 and
12237 -2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �
title,
.�� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO -
��STATE OF CALIFORNIA_ 1I1►�,�IT
fm LLOYD HUBS$ CITY ENGINE R RC 21849 DATE — 0' {e
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I
ANNEXATION NO. 1
Tr 12305
CITY OFRANCHO CUCAHONOA A
n4j, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
3 BTATS OF CALD ORNIA j
�!
im i i nvo MuBB3. CITY ENGI_ ER RC 23089 OKTE
OygY6�CR
RESOLUTION t1O• RAN'HO
A a< SOLUTION OF 1H1HEI'AORY' INTENANCEIDISTRILiT aCT2t050
CUCP>iONSA ORDERING ENGINEER REPORT
FOR
NO 1 jr .TREEi LIGHTING
THE FINAL 0 12237 -2 the
ACCEPTING 12237 -1 AN Cucamonga did
63 -229 to
12134. 12237. of Rancho
the City intention No D3 -229 to
Council of lotion of nexation NO ntion No
NYEREAS, the C' 934 adopt it, Reso n w ;th An tion of required
ibed work in connect Nhieh Resul and manner as nt
4th day of
January, ib the time, form mention
the tnerein dezcr District No. 2+
order ynanterance ofhed said Resolution of I
hung 'u legally PIt of
83-229 was d',IiY Publtcatd° o of said
the of Clerk; a^ the Passage legally
pylaw, shown °jffice of the City notice °f was duly and
nn file �n the icon thereof, uired law, as
after
the adoption of laea number�as reR, oY
notices. c^ file �° Lhe office of
NHEREAS, location,
Son of li e. f,�n' manner,
0.esolut the time, Posting said Lion of the
posted In Fff id avft of the adoption property of
ears fv kheand lion thereof, notices
sons owning real
in
appears
city the adoption all p said Resolution ez
after duly mat led t0 dezcr Abed in such owners
the Litt
NH of Intention were imProve^aem^es and adovesses °Clerk of and
for the City, time form
Resolution be assessed the as known to the the
Proposed to 83 -229 acccrdi�n ailing duly mailed in of Nailing on file In
on the last copies we fe the Affidav It
intention No ears from
the sale aC which asi�ppea
of Rancho Cucamonga. law. idered evidence,
re4 °fired by ,erk; and duly received cons roceedi nO °abe
mannaffase of the City C• in this D
the J City council he tis acts the benefits
S the Ju'emplctlon work urfsdiction to
RHEREAS, Concerning ContemDiate� acquired .)
documentary. the , having now
oral and necessity for AtY Councl, the City the the
derived herefrom and said Council of
feQuires
derived Proposed work. City council
order the P resolvedest the convenience City lion of
It is hereby and
SECi� that the PublA ordering of the work, An said Resolu
Cucamonga District and the o forth and described
Rancho work+ as hereby finally
annexation t0 that the done and made; and Engineer
is
hereby orders 83 -339 he the
intention No the ReV °nt f +ed by A. the
SECT, 2 method of assessment
�-
aPDnoveJ; a nd .m, assessments an
SECTION _21
re he ^P °y appr°4ed•
Engineer's Repo
fJ
,4'1
SECTION 4: The assessments shall nct begin until after 60 percent
of said tracts ave been occupied
PASSED, APPROVEO, and A.^OPTED this 1st day of February, 1904
AYES:
NOES
ABSENT
ATTEST:
auran N. asserman, ty L er
jaa
I*
on .e s, aycr
w S
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Engineer's Report for
Street Lighting Maintenance District No 2
Annexation No 1
SECTION 1. Authority for Report
This report is In compliance with the reo-ilrements of Ar I -le 4, Chapter
1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, Stat. if California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2 General Description
This City Council has elected .d annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit
"A" into Street Lighting Maintenance ,strict No. 2 The City Council has
determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon
all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the
street lights
Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district
are:
the furnishing of services and ma,erials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements an
local residential streets Improv!ment maintenance is considered of
general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be
divided an a per lot basis IL the case of condominiums with
airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be
considered to benefit the same as i lot
SECTION 3 Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications for st -eet lighting have been prepared by the
developers The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions
of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering
Division, Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development
plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting
areas The plans and specifications f)r street lighting Improvement on the
individual development is hereby made a ,)art of this report to the same extent
as If said plans and specifics were atta:hed hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district
Include; the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of
any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area.
SECTION 4, Estimated Costs
No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction.
All Improvements will be constructed by uevelopers. 8ascd on available data,
it is citimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as
Indicated below, These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be
based on actual cost data
U:
S The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No 2
(including Annexation No. 1 comprised of 118 I..ts and 41 street lights) is
shown below:
1. S.C.E Maintenance and Energy:
Lamp ize� want ty Rate--
b8UOL
•H g re,'Sure la um V for
'•SCE Schedule L$ -1. A,l n'ght service per map per
month, effective January 1, 1983.
Lamps Rate Ma's Total
193 X 8.75 X 12 520,265.00
2. Costs per dwelling Unit:
Total Annual Maintenance Cost • 20 ` 265.00 r 34.30 /year unit
No, o units n District - 591 --
O34 30 divided by 12 • 2.86 /mo. /unit
Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6
SECTION 5 Assessment Diagram
Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and
labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ", Annexation No. 1.
These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report
SECTION 6 Assessment
Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all
dwelling units within the District and t•:at assessment shall be er it for each
unit Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot u, parcel of
assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportiunal
to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel.
It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
District.
SECTION 7 Order of Events
1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings.
2 City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Englneer's
Report.
Liz
3 City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to anrea a District and sets
public hearing date.
4 City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and
determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings
S. Every year in May, the City Engireer files a report with the City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and
approves, or modifies and apprnves the Individual assessments
EXHIBIT "A"
eProperties and improvements to be Included within Annexation No 1 of Street
Lighting Maintenance District 2:
Tract Nos No of Dwelling Units Local Lights
12184 32 1'
12237
12237 -1
12237 -2 86 30
0
G
7
a
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO„ 2
ANNEXATION NO. t
Tit 1218+ - --
I
f t .i i •1 i •I _
r M _
I 1) f 1
�jI 'Ir_1_ t• d i ,
t I -
•1 1 �. Y _
' )) I 11 I t •1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title;
t {L
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO —.
L— STATE OF CALUORM
im LLOYD NJ889 CITY ENGI R R .XSg DEE 111 page
•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2
oc c•%
�p •3
ANNEXATION NO. 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
;iS 12237.
) ? -1 and
37 -2
title;
A
N n�ge
w
C'I
ORDINANCE NO. 65 -C
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAM04GA AMENDING CHAPTER 14.20, SECTION 14.20 110 OF
TIT'.E 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE WHICH
REG'J4.ATES SIGNS, TO' ELIMINATE THE TWENTY (20) FOOT
MAXIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT FOR WALL SIGNS ON INDUSTRIAL
BUILDINGS.
The L4ty Council of the Ci:y of Rancho Cucarwnga does ordain as
follows?
SECTION 1: Section 14 20.110 of Chapter 14.20 is vrended to read as
follows:
t ^• '�_- --^rim P............r, -- .ar...,...............rr..�
i y..
M;
HVY
Y1
LLY,
Yl \ \W
r+.M�
•,.arty
w1
rdY
_V\Y.r'1
`r�
r�r
rt• r�l
\1 �Yt
u
L
��wYil
M1y6W���tt.]�I.1L.1
YIrMw�e
_
f 4��.s..V
ML•�•••1
W �. .e
w tirrr
er.r.r w.+f
rr.,r
J
SECTION 2: The City Council finds that this amendment will nut
adversely affect the eniirortwnt and hereby iwues a Negative Declaration
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published w4thin fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Dail Ry e0art., a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontar o, 0rnia, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cncamonn3, California.
PISSED, APPPOVEO, and ADOPTED this _ day of 1903
AY:3:
NOES:
ASSENT:
5.L
ORDINANCE NO. '2f1 .lq
'
lCCALIFORNIA CITY
CITY
HAPTER RANCHO 08,
AMEMINO,TITLET17.
CUCAi40NOA,
-B AND C, OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE, T'
FAMILY
TABLES 17.08.040 IT For
A CONDITIONAL
THAN 90051DUARE FEETINGLE
DETACHED
the City of Ran.. ^ho
Cucamonga, Califonria, daes
The City council of
ordain as fol'ows:
-0 is amended
0-B is
to require a Lor�dttiona Use
feet within
SECTION 1: Table 17 08.040
f detached less
a dnilY
than g00 square
Exhibit
Permit for s{ng
the VL, L, and LM Discr Scts, as shown to attached
Conditional Use
2: Table 17 08.040 -C is amended
to require a
feet within
SECTION
family detached dwlnlattachedsExlhibit�g
+square
Permit LM, and M
the L.
this amendment l ot cause
SECTION 3: The City Council
trnnm nt
and hereby izsues an Negative
a verse impacts upon the enly
significant
Declaration.
Mayor shall sign this
Ordinance and dathe ys sCafter fits
SECTION 4: the
'the to be publlstaed
fifteen circulation
cf
®
shall cause a newspaper general
circulated in the City of
passage at least once In The Re oat,
ornian
in the City
published
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
_.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _.
day of
Y
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
ATTEST:
Lauron M Ha;Serman, City Clerk
kep
on a s, aYor
�S
,
EXHIBIT "A" TO OROINANCE 211 -A
Sk.
•
TABLE 17-08-040-B BASIC DEYELOPMEHT SPAHDABDB
ova •5wa.1.R.m n. L
LM
Of
No
If
w
Mast. N.I Ar W 111,5" 4"0
SAIO
MIR
MIR
UIR
Mucus Sol VIAN 1.300
mat
10.00;
MIR
MIR
I
Mva� t 0••04 U tte Vo 1• VOW
UI to
UH
UP
Li y
IO.fmU.O W l i 1
1
t
mGUuNM,, D.OUSSM cats GUN,
1bueM0
bWR mm410 tmwO
NCgti
W dsw�a
Saw. 11u"1 Sun. Gun.
Sun.
10
Wit
MIR
ar•0WU I MS '•r1110 ".a
Orgu
MIOVU
ilbwm w`,ula 100 70
"
15
SIR
MIR
14wsm ftm I" In
H
IN
MIR
MIR
1hm. f .W. f0 b
]0
la
MIR
MIK
l0 r.% U.0
Mn DUw flau]• " "
I0
IS
MIR
MIR
(0 floral pr.<.1.a Oro)
.
LO•sv
I., Tod"'• SO., Sun.
IS.,
It.,.
NIX
KIM
rM1tf ".I
rM.l
"'I
C•rgrt Lb TMC IS I5
10
II
MIR
M K
Nlme Lb TW lots 1,10
10°
NIR
"R
4u TU0 " "
11
lot
"'K
Ndl
O
)Yn•I. ]U..l If• C•
Il•
fl
f�
f•
Irwnu, Ml ro
I.s WN
At W. "15 " 5
Jul
1:0 I0
I1" l•
SAO
Lt• R.. em
Aei•Yay K'AIJ
t•Mmlul &PCIALM
a1p�R11oIM�
ham to Y Rl MIR S'■
I1
"
"
f0
Olnn "'A M R
10
O
Ii
p
aNI"111s1YtbM 11 as
if
"f
lot
If(
1• Ifq 10%
110%
"q
SOq
14q
t,ocC
Dpe Of. I•pul"
MW. Lpp. gout ul01MIR loss," R
aN 111
315.150
100 too
111 too
IGrsuM F w'
Uppn a"" UMl1
Q... Dpn go.nl MIR MISS
M.A
10%
110..
30%
US... ql
I;' l ca nS'.•( 41% 10%
19%
i1q
if,
if\
IM1lnl.16 .w
WY6f A FttiRI] RIR M A
M K
■p w m f.. Ir
too,"
]alMSM"f I I
6
It O .o w 5.. 11.01011
1
1. 4wmK Iwro MU, fN.^,•l -nU arM wmlu
L N "•YWU fNp U..to (111Vf +aY lro
I. vwua.. fr.n1111u Mw.b (WLNpI n l..USm It 0111>•N
L AN to fnl d 4"on,lo WI_ L M LM disum
• W 111Y111 I., f"IO p M a O.Ux r'.'WYpa1N N4. L<NAAS7
L Wu I Sun - 11A,n" as" of TL a• L tht.,
�aq
/�wyyT•�lN IoR0e�uq•�ORU�I ✓Q�IL�IW.. NNI U.S.
1p 1pyr 10. y1WffM1 +Y
0
nYI. IM 6Y..00.C.ro1l.M.l
D� I�fT —ILIro
Sk.
EXHIBIT "B" TO ORDItULtICE 211 -A
TABLE 17.011.740 -C OPTIONAL DEVBLOPFSSHT STANDARDS
m-"ANW",J)
L W
M MR
a
M MbA
SAC SAC
WA MIA
NIA
dal
Vwuuw np.mlbMOAM
f.NY).ueb.lnau MIA
NR
��
IMM.nun Mtl
M.Nev.f DN.UTA IhIMC
W b UP'.
L' b U01a
L'i U
01
(Sir.... pw.tnl
1
I 1 11
IfYAM.M D.+.UIR (MYt AMA
$..U,Ar -1
K
MONIV
000.0:V IOMRI
will.
S
rmil Owes.. AIR
AIR
M... "A"
Vwu.nn ,.lb RW.
IC ..0u1.1 fret
wb.al
4w*vn D.pb
Vtn.l.in n'R.1!On.M.
boll YnuNIN NIR
NCR
I.o.l
local fVM
Wla H•t1c
30H I0 »3
SS )p
luw.t.'n'+41
f•
Sc f�
Y
tm.0 fu «t
Tac
(rVUab. W16
eiJNl
U'3
301 S1 101 fG
201 fc
Al tnl.
b 3
Su. A.w�)
ID..Wnf "it
Atn.w'r'/ 91,11 I
RAaO.cIW fWm;
Ipnt b Rant
31 if
N R M R
V 0.
0.
10 10
N R M R
N R
11.0111MIUtYMM
35 If
IS• tic
llc
^O,,.1. Oita I,.n
1000.$ a I" ISO
III ISO 110110 tic b^
ICK.t1 It.
C".. CO. SO ... 3
S\ 1•
31♦ U•
311
mw..* .I
L•tn:. Opp Apt..
10. tf.
40l .<Y
134
I...... ".1 ,W
4avOm AtW lwJtb
P14 Rw tw
p$s.pt li 'wrap
1 0104"
LR
/ Apun1
pr+tn\ b S.tup
l .02 010.1
I tSam IAMdS
ft u�
SWt..
i-.Ot Iti•L
dV C. Obit
MIA R.TMrp
potato+ u U.U.
1. 01010•H
N.MM Y9 Vnr\4.
0 .0 nwtl Vin WY1.IIPw.r
Mlw b 1.MC P.Of 44" fw.eb pb.n
e pm11 «twt.,A. fO
/Kt of VL w L DUt"t
6 AOO It lwt ftll.n.I
b VS. L w LM IYVQL
SA. in 11 Ip\ r O.
y. .f Yf.&M.p bbn.ur
pr V. bNr W.n.n
IK1.wK 1Atl.bH'V
M11n\wlw tl.rl Vr
.... ^.. eI.
KM sA AIL
/f��\
C
5
I
ORDINANCE NO. 83= 18 =O3-CO al<v
AN ORDINANCE OF THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASIOES011 ARROW HIGHWAYI,rBETWEEN TURNER pAVENUE
THE DU /AL) TERLO'A MEDIUM FROM MEI NTIA L (4 -8 DDU /AC) ENTIAL (B -14
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, does
ordain as follows:
tty Council hereby finds and determines the
SECTION 1: The C
following: of Rancho
A. Cucamonga, the Planning Caaa public of the hearing hold Cucamonga, following a Pub11c law, re ommends the
time and manner prescribed by
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and i, the
this City Council has held a public hearth ar�d and
time and manner prescribed by law and duly
considered said recommendation.
B. Plan ands Develop^ents consistent
with h General rezonin of Ranch0
• Cucamonga.
C. mpact asnProvided lnvthe NegativecDeclaration filed This zoing 111111 hae no
herein
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned
in the manner stated,
and the Development Districts Map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor's sizerlocat d on the west side ofr Center lAvenue,
between Arrow Route and 26th Street is hereby changed
Medium Residential Density Residential (8-14 du /ac to Low Medium
The Mayor fall signbthisdrwiithtn fifteenC(15)Oldayssafteraits
the same
Passage at least once in The DailtyReoar0ntario�s Cal California,
circulation
published in t e
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
'& .I
• PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of January,
1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
Lauren M. Wasseman, City Clerk
/Jr
v
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
J
DATE: February 1, 1934
TO: Mayor and Members of the CiAy Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner /Li/ /U
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - CALMARK DEVELOPMENT - HERITAGE
N N
nvujino
Attached please find the amended page to the CaInark Development
Agreement, per City Council direction at their January 18, 1984
meeting. lni. amendment has been reviewed and approved by Larry Persons
of Calmark Development Corporation.
11
RG /jr
Attachment
El
M
-2li
49 ORDINANCE NO. 41- 1944GD
E
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIMONGA AND CALMARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines as follows.
A. Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5 authorizes the City
to enter into binding Development Agreements with persons having legal or
equitable interests in real property for the development of such property.
B. Three copies of the proposed Development Agreement between the
City and Calmark Development Corporation are on file in the office of the City
Clerk, and the same are public records of the City.
C. The proposed Development Agreeme.,t pertain Lo real property
situated in the City and described as follows:
Parcel No 2 of Parcel Map No. 5792, in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, '�nunty of San Bernardino, State of
California, as per Book 59, Pages 74 and 75 of Parcel
Maps, in the office of the County R ^carder of said
County
D. The City Council has held a public hearing on the proposed
Development Agreement and notice of that public hearing has been given for the
time and In the manner prescribed by Government Code Section 65867.
E. The provisions of the proposed Development Agreement are
consistent with the General Plan, and there is no specific plan effecting the
property subject to the proposed Development Agreement.
SECTION 2: The proposed Development Agreement between the City and
Calmark Deveropent Corporation, referred to in Section 1 above, is hereby
approved On the effective date of this Ordinance the Mayor shall sign as
many copies of said Development Agreemnt as are necessary for the use of the
parties, the City Clerk shall attest to the same and shall deliver one fully
signed copy to Calmark Development Corporation
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall taus —e tfie same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Oail , Re ort, a newspaper of gereral circulation
published in the City of ntar o a ?5n
Re and circulated in .he City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California
�9
Ordinance No.
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __ day of
198-
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
n e s, Mayor
tairen N. asserman, tY er
kep
(r
0
C= VELOPMENT AGREEMENT
i
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 18th day of January, 1984, between
CAL- RANCHO, INC. ('Property Owner ") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
California ( "City "). -
RECITALS
` This Agreement is predicated upon the following faces*
1. Government Code Section 65854- 65895.5 authorizes the City to enter
Into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable
i
interests in real property for the development of such propert•,
2. Under Section 65865, the City has adopted rules a -i regulations
establishing procedures, requirements and administrative guidelines for
consideration of development agreements
3. Property Owner has requested City to consider entering into a
development agreemet.t and proceedings and have been taker in accordance with
City's rules and regulations.
4 City has found that the development agreement is consistent with the
General Plan.
S. On January 18, 1984, City adopted Ordinance 217 approving the
development agreement with Property Owner and said action was effective on
January 18, 1984.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows.
1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless context otherwise requires,
the follow ng terms shall have the following meaning:
a. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga
b. "Project" is the development approved by the City, described
further in paragraph 7 hereinbelow.
c. 'Property Owner" is Cal- Rancho, Inc and includes all of its
successors in interest and assigns.
d "Real Property" is the real property referred to in paragraph 3
hereinbelow.
. e. "Senior Housing Overlay District" is the zoning category created
by City Ordirance 191 adopted April 20, 1983.
2
(, I
f. -Target Tenant" Is defired as Individuals who are fifty -five (55)
earsyearsor ode , or married couoies whose head of household is fifty -five
g "Affordable Rents" - Rents charged will be affordable to
individuals or couples earning equal to or less than eighty percent (80%) of
the current County of San Bernardino median income as determined by the
Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, which rent shall on an
annualized %) of theecurrent median income thirty purposes of thisfdefinition,,
percent (305)
rents charged for all one (1) bedroom units shall be subject to computat an
based upon eighty percent (805) of the median income for i two (2) person
household. Rents charged for all two (2) bedroom units shall be subject, to
computation based upon eighty (805) of the median Income for ill households (4
or more persons).
2. Recitals. The recitals are part of the agreement bethic' the parties
and shaTT- a enforced and enforceable as any other provision of this
Agreement
3 Descri lion of Real Pro ert The real property which .s the subject
of this greement s eescr. a more fully in Exhibit "A•' attached hereto and
incorported herein by ^eference.
4. Interest of Pro art Owner. Property Owner represents That it has
full legalt M io ire rea property, that is has full legal T^Nh lCrl to
hos enter
into this Ag ^ee.Ent, that there itonthetrealpDroperty , eandythat all other
other interest in fee ownership
agreeto who legal or thereeare tanyhhotdersrof
deeds trust e l to senior to the lien of this
OelopmentAgreenent the holdersf such deeds0ftrust have assented to the
terms of this Ocvelopment Agreement in writing and agree to be bound by the
provisions hereof.
5 Bindinc -.ffect of A reement. The burdens of this Agreement shall run
with thj— eal ,v•oper y an s a. ind, and the benefits of artlfesAtoeiLent
shall inure to, the successors in interest and assigns of the D
6. Relatlonshi of Parties. ertytOwner understood that thii
that Property contractual
resat tan; D 'etween y
indcDendeat contractor and is not the agent of City for any purpose
whatsoever.
City s Auproval Proceedings for Project. On April 20, 1983, City
approved It s nce Great ng a en or Ilous Overlay District. On April
sdo ted a zoning designation of "Senior Housing Overlay
20, :983, the C 'y D applications by Property
District" for the real property. The record of the aDP Co�rncil of City
Owner proceedings before the Planning Commission and
ecord iin in these
on file in the office of City and
matter-; are incorporated herein in full by this reference as though
®
in full. Property Owner proposes to construct 233 ap artand other
recreational the subject property�ia 6 lities, and
11 as are sc1ferparking
h more fullysin he site
amenities on
-2-
(, a
Plan for Planned Development 83 -01 ( °Site Pian•) submitted by Property Owner
and approved by City, a copy of which 1s attachec hereto as Exhibit "8" and
incorporated 4erain by reference. The Site Plan includes various conditions
of approval which are not changed, altered or modified by this Development
Agreement uniess specifically set forth herein.
8. Chances in Project. No substantial change, modification, revision or
alteration ma`y- Te mae-Tn—the Site Plan approved on April 20, 1983, without
review and approval by City.
9. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the
date first above written and shall expire twenty (20) years after the
occupancy of the first tenant in an apartment unit in the Project, but in no
event later than twenty -five (25) years after the comnencerant of the term of
this Agreement, subject to the annual review described in paragraph 13
hereinbelow.
10. Restrictions on Rental Units. Except as set forth hereinbelow, all
tenants, occupants, an res ents o apartment units in the Project shall be
Target Tenants. Said apartment units shall not be rented, occupied, leased or
subleased to tenants or occupants who aref\Target Tenants without the City's
prior written consent, except as set foth below.
Person or persons not a Target Tenant may occupy an apartment unit if he
occupies the apartment unit with a resident occupant who is a Target Tenant
. and if any of the following conditions are met.
a. in an emergency, and for sn long as the state of emergency exists;
101
i
J
b. on a temporary basis, not to exceed three (3) months out of any
calendar year (grandchildren, blood relatives); and
c, medical support personnel or private nurses for resident occupants
who are Target Tenants.
11. Rents and Rent Adjustments. The Property Owner shall establish and
maintain ai of ab'e renter seventy percent (70%) of all apartment units in
the Project. (Said sonventy percent (70 %) of the apartment units are
hereinafter referred to as "Reserved Units. ") For purposes of this provision,
rent shall include both the amount cherged for occupancy of an apartment and
any utility charges if utilities are riot separately metered. If utilities are
separately metered, they will not be considered in the affordable rent
computation. (It is speciffically agreed that said restriction on rents shall
apply only to the Reserved Units, as Property Owner would have not entered
into this Agreement or agreed to develop the Project if said rent restriction
or any rent restriction applied to more than the Restricted Units.)
In the event that rents are increased for Reserved Units, a minimum of
sixty (60) days written notice of any rent increase shall be provided to all
affected tenants in Reserved Units and to the City.
-3-
c, 3
12. Maintenance of A artments as Rentals. During the term hereof and such
extensions as may a agree to, a apartment units in the Project shall
remain rental units. No apartment unit in the Project sha11 be eligible for
conversion from rental units to condominiums, townhouses or any other common
Interest subdivision in which some fee ownership in the apartment unit would
be granted to a person or entity other than the Property Owner or its
permitted successor or assignee or in which ownership of the Project would be
transferred to a corportion ( "Co -Op ") or other entity which would then sell
stock or some other cooperative ownership interest to a prospective owner or
occupancy of an apartment or dwelling unit, provfded that nothing herein
contained shall preclude the sale of the entire Project to a single purchaser
other than a Co -op.
1 ?. Submission of Materials and Annual Review.
a. Prior to the execution hereof, the Property Owner shall submit to
the C ty the following information.
(1) An analysis of the cost of the Project including land cost,
constroction cost, financing cost, and so forth;
(2) Tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods of that
Property Owner shall use to advertise the availability of apartments in the
Project and screeninq mechanisms that Property Owner intends to use to limit
the occupancy of the apartments to the Target Population.
b. The Property Owner shall file with City an annual report
containing information on the Project specified herein for the preceeding
calendar year. Said annual reports shall be filed with the City no later than
Varch 15 following the previous calendar year. The report shall contain such
information as City may then require, including, but not limited to, the
following.
(1) rent schedules then in effect; utility charges (if any);
(2) project occupancy profile including age, income ciaracteristics of
residents, number of automobiles owned by Project residents (Lotal);
(3) listing of substantial physical defects in the Project including a
desrription of any repair or maintenance work undertaken in the reporting
yEar; And
(4) a description of maintenance of the Project including the
condition of apartment units, landscaping, walkways, stairs, and recreational
areas.
City shall be allowed o conduct annual physical inspections of the
Project as it shall deem necessary provfded that said inspections do not
unreasonably interfere with the normal operations of the Project. The City
shall further be allowed to conduct an annual survey of residents in the
Project in order to assess their satisfaction with to Project. The survey may
contain, but shall not necessarily be limited to, questions regarding
mangement /tenant relations, maintenance of the Project, design features,
general attitude toward the Project, and so forth
-4-
c!
14 Tenant Selection. Contracts and Rules and Re Motions. On receipt of
an application or occupany In a Reserve in t, roperty Owsner shall
determine the eligibility of the occupany under the terms of this Development
Agreement. Property Owner shall be entitled to rely on the information
contained In the application sworn to by the applicant. All agreements for
rental of all apartment units- in the Project shall be to writing. The
proposed rental agreement or lease form for the Reserved Units shall be
provided to City for its review and approval, a copy of which is attached
hereto as "Exhibit "0" and hereby approved. Such rules of conduct and
occupancy shall be given to each tenant of an apartment unit prior to such
tenants' occupancy.
15 Termination and Eviction of Tenants. A tenancy in a Reserved Unit may
be term note w t nut t e termination being deemed an eviction under the
following circumstances:
a. death of the sole tenant of the unit,;
b, by the tenant at the expiration of a term of occupancy or
otherwise, upon thirty (30) days written notice;
c by abandonment of the premises by the tenant; or
d by failure of tenant to maintain income eligibility pursuant to
the provisions hereof, providing that Property Owner gives tenant sixty (60)
days written notice of such termination, or
e, by failure of tenant to execute or renew a lease.
Any termination of a tenancy of a Reser "ed Unit other than those listed in
this subparagraph shall constitute an eviction Property Owner shall only
evict in compliance with the provisions of California law and then only for
material non - compliance with the terms of the rental agreement, lease or rules
and regulations of the Project. Property Owner shall establish appeal and /or
grievance procedures and rules and regulations for use for evictions of
tenants of Reserved Units, which shall be submitted to and approved by the
City prior to the occupancy of any Reserved Unit in the Project The rules
and regulations a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "E" is hereby
approved.
16 Local Resident . Preference shall be given where possible to
applicants to the Project who have been residents of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. This factor, however, shall not be given any prio,ty over the
other elements of tenant selection in paragraph 14 hereof.
17. Hazard Insurance. Property Owner shall keep the Project and all
improvements t ereon nsured at all times against loss or damage by fire or
other risks covered by a standard extended coverage endorsement and such other
risks, perils or coverage as Property Owner may determine. During the term
-5-
vs
S hereof, the Project shall be insured to its full Insurable valve City shall
have the right to review insurance coverage maintained by Property Owner or
its successors and assigns and the power to require additional Insurance to be
carried in amounts required by the City at the City's sole discretion so that
the provisions of this paragraph are complied with. City's action or inaction
hereunder shall not subject It to liability to any third persons or entities.
18. Maintenance Guaranty. In order to insure that maintenance of the
project s pi— erorme n attar ante with the maintenace plan as outlined in the
Senior Housing Overlay Oistrlct administrative guidelines and in this
Development Agreement, Property Owner shall either establish a landscape
ma "tenance district pursuant to State law and City ordinate or regulation or,
at Property Owner's option, post a maintenace deposit or other legal security
reasonsbly acceptable to the City to be used by the City in the event that
Property Owner shall fail to adequately maintain the Project as herein
required. The parties hereto agree that a maintenance depost of $12,000 is
acceptable, which maintenance depost may be in the form of a letter of credit,
certificate of deposit, bond or comparable instrument.
19. Soecific Restrictions on Develo ent of Real Pre e�rry. The following
specific restrict ons s a a so cover t e use o e rth eal property:
Project. a, only residential uses of the real property are permitted in the
b, maximum density of residential dwelling units In the Project shall
never be greater than 30 dwelling units per acre.
feet. C. the rle.ai:aum height for each of the propo ed buildings shall be 35
d, maximum s4ze for all of the buildings and the proposed square
footage for each cf the apartment types located therein is set forth more
fully on Exhibit "8° attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
e. provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public
purposes are contained in the conditions for approval of Parcel Map 7827 and
are incorporated he ^ein by this reference.
20. Hold Harmless. Property Owner agrees to and shall hold City, its
officers, agents, emp oyees and representatives hamless from liability for
damage or claims for damage for personal injury including death and claims for
property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of
Property Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or
other person acting on his behalf which relate to the Project. Property Owner
agrees to and shall defend City and its officers, agents, employees and
representatives from actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused
hold Property
ldharmlessagr w c v e
eementappliesto all dam n i h e
ages and claimsfordama Project.
damage suffered
or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the operations referred toin
this Development Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared,
supplied or approved the pima, specifications or other documents for the
Project.
-6-
1,
' 4J
21. Affect of Develo ment A eement on Land Use Reguglatl�ons. Rules,
regulations, an o c e policies govern ng permitted uses ui— the real
property, the density of the real property, the design, improvement and
construction standards and speciflcationf applicable to development of the
real property, are those rules, regulations and official policies in force at
the tine of execution of this agreement. It is understood that City may grant
Proeprty Owner a dwellino unit density bonus, may reduce its requirements for
on -site parking, may waive its requirement for covered on -site parking and may
reduce and /or waive other fees is an incentive for Property Owner to construct
the Project and for both parties to enter into this Development Agreement.
22. Develo ment incentives. Pursuant to paragraph 21 of the Development
greement, e City 4111 grant property owner the following
development incentives fer development on the subjec' property:
a. fie Beautification Fee levied pursuant to City Council Resolution
79 -1, Section 7.0, will be waived in its entirety.
b. The maximum density per acre on the subject property shall be
increased to 31.: dwelling units par acre.
c. The maximum number of required off street parking spaces shall oe
lowered to .7 parking spaces per dwelling unit
d. The requirement for covered parking spaces will be waived ir. its
entirety.
e. Payment of both the Drainage Fee and Systems Development Fee by
the property owner will be deferred tnd will be payable con:urrently with the
occupancy of the first unit on the subject property. The fees will be based
upon the Ordinances and schedules in effect as of the date of submittal of the
project and will not be effected or increased by any increases taking effect
after submittal of the project. "Date of submittal" of the project will mean
the time that plans are submitted to the City in order to have the City issue
building permits for construction of the Improvementr on the subject property.
f. The property owner will be reimbursed for certain off -site
construction costs set forth below from the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency Affordable Housing Set Aside Fund, Those off -sit=
construction costs will include the following:
(1) Construction costs for initallatier of a storm drain line along
Archibald Avenue to Base Line Avenue approximately 390 feet,
(2) ComPleLion of off -site improvements on the west side of Archibnld
Avenue including street widening, paving, curb and 9:1tter from Lomita Court to
Base Line Road.
-7-
L7
Property owner will provide for City review 61d estimates with such
documentation as the City may request in order to evidence costs incurred by
property owner for installation of these various off -site improvements.
Property owner will and does hereby assign to City any right of
reimbursement which it may have, whether by law, or by any approval first
granted ay City on the subject property, for reimbursement from adjacent
property owners for the off -site Improvements, the costs of which are being
reimbursed to property owner by City in connection with this Development
Agreement. Property owner acknowledges and agrees that amounts collected win
the future by the City which would have been reimbursed to the property owner
at some future date will be retained by the City by reason of this assignment
• and the City has expedited and accelerated the reimbursement process to the
Development Agreement •nd has advanced City monies for reimbursel, which City
monies will be reimbursed to City by future property owners.
23. Enforcement. In the ev,nt of a default under the provisions of this
Agreement y roperty Owner, City shall give written notice to Property Owner
(or its successor) at the Project, or by registered or certified mail
addressed to Property Owner at the address stated in the Agreement, or to such
other address as may have been designated by Property Owner, and If such
violation Is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within
ninety (90) days after such notice is given, or if not corrected within such
reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said
breach or default cannot be curred within ninety (90) days (provided that acts
to cure the ;,,;ach or default must be commenced within said ninety (90) days
S and must thereat,ir to delinquently Pursued by Owner) then the City may,
without further notice, declare a default unoer this Agreement and, upon any
such declaration of default, the City may bring any action necessary to
enforce the obligations of Property Owner growing out of the operation of this
Development Agreement, apply to any rourt, state or federal, for specific
performance of the provisions of this Development Agreement, or for an
injunction against any violation by Property Owner of any provision of this
Agreement, or for such other relief as may be appropriate, it being agreed by
Property Owner that the injury to City arising from default under any of the
terms of this Developnent Agreemnt would be irreparable and that it would be
extremely difficult to asLertaln the amount of compensation to City to afford
adequate relief In l -ght of the purnoses and policies advanced and satisfied
by approval of the Project and by this Development Agreement.
24. Event (if Defiiult. Property Owner is in default under this Agreement
upon the i� appen n'g--o? one or more of the i'ollowirg events or conditions.
a. if a warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by
Property Owner of City 1s false or proves to have been false in any material
respect when it was nude;
b. if n finding and determinatior. is made by the City following an
annual review pursuant to paragraph 13 hereinabove upon the basis of
substantial evidence that Property Owner has not complied in good faith with
any of the terms ind conditions of this Agreement, after notice and
opportunity to cure at described in Paragraph 23 hereinabove;
c. breach by Property Owner of any of the provisions or terms of this
-8-
L'S
Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in Paragraph 23
hereinabove.
25. Proceeding Upon Default. City does not waive any claim of defect in
performance by roperty e-R on periodic review City ues not modify or
terminate this Agreement. Nonperformance by Property Omer shall not be
excused because of performance. by Property Owner of the oaligations herein
contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a
failure of any third party or entity, other than the City. All otrer remedies
at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or
in the City's regulations governing development agreements are available to
the parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Development
Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Development
Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach
thereof or default hereunder.
26. Rights of Lenders Under this Agreement. Should Property Owner place
or cause to be placed any encum randi a or —lien on the Project, or any part
thereof, the benefict+ry ("Lender*) of said encumbrance or lien, including,
but not limited to mortgages shall have the right at any time during the term
of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to:
a, do any act or thing required of Property Owner under this
Agreement, and any such act or thing done and performed by Lender shall be as
effective as if dore by Property Owner himself;
b. realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by
exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded
in law or in equity or by the security document evidencing the encumbrance or
lien (herein called the "Trust Deed "), and to:
(1) transfer, convey or assign the title of Property Owner to the
Project to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale
be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to d power of sale contained
to the Trust Deed;
(2) acquire and succeed to the interest of Property Owner by virtue of
any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to a
court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in the Trust Deed.
27. Notice to Lender. City under this Agreement shall give written notice
of any eau t er reac under this Agreement by Property Owner to Lender and
afford Lender the opportunity after service of the notice to:
a. cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service
of said notice, where the default can be cured by °snt of money;
b, cure the breach of default within ninety (9u) days after service
of said notice where the breach or default can be cured by something other
than the payment of money and can be cured within that time; or
c. cure the breach or default in such reasonable time as may be
required where something other than money is required to cure the breach or
default and cannot be performed within ninety (90) days after said notice,
-9-
(9
provided that acts to zure the breach or default are commenced within ninety
are)thereaerioddafter se vicentinued by notice if default on Lender by City and
211. Action B Lenderorestallwany tactton other provision b each of this
Agreement, a en er may
todfoecloseeitsf encumbrance or lien on Projects The riproceedings so
commenced may be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order of court or for
foreclosure of the encumbrance under a paver of sale contained to the
instrument creating the encumbrance or lien. The proceedUrgs shall not,
however, forestall any such action by the City for the default or breach by
Property Owner unless:
a. they are commenced within thirty (30) days after service on Lender
of tha notice described hereinabove;
Is . they are, after having been comnen,:ed, diligently pursued to the
manner required by law to completion; and
c Lender keeps and perform- all of the terms, covenants and
ns hil ruherce expenditure money re
Property Ownerunti he foreclosure proceedings are complete ora
discharged by redemption, satisfaction, or payu-nt.
£9. Ltabilit of Lender. No Lender shall have any liability under the
terns o [ s greemen>: unless it acquires title to the Project through
(� ttteltouthe Project subject ito the fobligations of a successor �to it shall the Property
Owner as herein provided.
30 Rent Control. In consideration for the limitations herein provided,
the City agrees tnat It shall, during the term .)f this Agreement, not take any
action, the effect of which will be control, determine, affect the rents for
cont located in
rentsean the remainder ofithe that the the
project.
31 Attorne s' Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of
this Deve opment Agreement or because of in alleged breach or default
hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover the costs and
attorney e determined fe incurred anCthe proceedilagaland astuih reasonable attorneys' fees
a
32 Cumulative Remedies. The respective rights and remedies provided by
cumulative andenthe exercise of any one orrrioreiofblsuchrrightstorsremedies
shall not preclude or affect the exercise, at the same or at different times,
of any other such rights or remedies for the same or different defaults or
breaches or for the same or different failures to perform or observe any term
or provision of this Agreement.
LJ
-10-
33. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and
burdens ereo Shall inure to the respective parties hereto, their legal
representatives, executives, administrators, successors and assigns, provided
however, that if Property Owner sells the Project and the purchaser assumes
Property Owner's obligations hereunder accruing after said sale then Property
t1, Owner shall have no obligations hereunuer after said sale is consummated.
Yi
34. Recordation. This Agreement shall, at the expense of Property Owner,
•i be recur e n e official records of the County of San Bernardino to
s' accordance with provisions rf the Government Code.
35. Miscellaneous. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with
#! and governe y t e aws of the State of California. The provisions of this
y Development Agreement shall be liberally consrued to effect its purpose as set
* forth herein and in the attachments hereto. Whenever the context so requires,
i, the singular number includes the plural, the plural includes the singular,
includes then masculine and /or feminine. an The time limits set forthr i gender
Agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the parties in accordance with
9 the procedures for adoption of a development agreement.
36. Partial Invalidlt If any provisions of this Agreement shall be
Invalid, ego or unen orceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of
f the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired
1. thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties
< • and shall be effective on the day and year first above written regardless of
the date of actual execution hereof.
PROPERTY OWNEP:
DY : ,��—
Name
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CJ
-22-
rJ
C�
1nJ
EXHIBIT "A"
(Legal description of the Project)
Parcel No. 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 7837,
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State
Book52, Pages a andZ5_ of Parcel taps, in
Recorder of said County.
7 )-
in the City of Rancho
of California, as per
the office of County
— —� E%HIBTT B
c � • I • ,� 'IT1, -a1 f �"
e -
1
�. 04 t .v
—J I U I ^� �0 • �' I n ���"
IIII�III ' 11119!1 Ii•I I IQ( 1 I P I it °'II
0
111 D
b
ALHVR INIxIIl1♦N pANCxO CUCAYONOA
S.r,nr�n �ti�ivFS 7
n. CH ArA.nur.
♦ j - �� OlY11ALOCCWAMC11 ... I...l,
\ CALMAnK npupl no.
EXHIBIT L
amTT•Mq.Tno CALMARK REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
APARTMENT LEASE
THIS LEASE. I.I.Nas Items - NY of , D -. AT Na "tire
n01NN11N Ullp `OwMr ILLSIOIII in0 _
n NSNNIN "I'M ttllaagi mum,
"Al OVMCA.YVn1. iMe TENANT rdau hem in. 0YM101 to, YY0N1Y1 YY 0my. to. O.N.O.,pMVIn YAWpMnt ,!1_
�. GIIIOrNY, last the A.. Al t01hnYM.
IM On PO NY el 19, Y the IpYI .0 Og11111, 11
YN InYIIY
mNY 0" iM NYIW In OFIMe 010 Ne tlIY 01 YN ON Nery mMln 0YI1nI "'a ANN,
Tne Wile/ !IM Y H
IOIIOw
1. OWNCe NYNWINM rplpl light T[IIANT 011. Ym 011 111 ~j" Wbll. WINIn had In uyYl 1110, 1NTlnYIOn Ol lnll
SenlntY.OHNCO"111NIYn010 TENANT the YOIKt HfYNry egNI110y tmglYt ! \eILIYIMIiOIY MgWry M1 .m TENANTS' ON!Vlll In Ine
",.I W.1. lg •001 Olm.viri IN- Nin1IY0 UYW All Me TENANT MyMe NMAN, ..wel no NA,. Ot 1. tNNO ANSI Y0htI1K ,Mn YITIn111On
.1 IM IIMNOY. TN0 MtYI11I Mad"t It Mt to N Vtwllp.61NY OYIIn1 tM I.,N, Ol It le IYKm0n1. Snd10 tM lNVllry b00Y1. b enY ONtYn INN.
el,b cuts" le Kul, "SIAM 6.11.1 %A. IN. N ml/tAilwenl. T "NIT qwO to nnml WIN, KOOYt OPIUM CWN CA! earn Ai to Onq Y.0
.tl1Y fPi v01µ INS N14MI OmOVn1 lMrNl. NO III.,., is 10 M Mw 0n .0 goolmy assi TENANT yTgl IO /,PIN 10OWNCh IA IO•
MW OPwW tM OWNCY nits elate P fenvi NN Nont'" assi At lno Dow" ,MAIM, to Ib T[HANT.
L
had . -. eib IYYY 1111.1NmItYU FNI" NIOOPOO N N IONI YIO ONInIML
1 TENANT WII Not Plo its PAY F"i'nIMp1I1 Yw N Me VM el Ne OIg11ML "I'At TI \M A. MA"A". IMF m4Y6 All NtMMe .I1, A" plNlt
t .-I 01 MINOb. TENANT WII µ0F 4n0 I.AmIlY+IP 111 I., NIA. If qYr Y!N 0110 ...,a a.. womnaNYM NNM. Roo 111M ... Y. TENANT
O - 10 INN Oy .., in1MMn1\ 10 WN -AN.M IyNL^ OIFYp TENANT II ENO, TNlrry Yyl' INOMO "INN MIICI aI NYI Nq...Me WIN
MIA. ire IYYM01i ina ..." 10 ill T1Mn1\ t11Ye.
. 40011.1.1 Mos, N.'aA.MC 0Y IIOPr np MOi11L N'JIe11N1 /r IIIeN11N /VIII IN OOnO WIPWt OWN[II! MIN WI111N 0 "Ynl.
S. TENANT p\m \oKtoe IS. NOnINL NIn Onlnp p.Ogo.c..gal tOSIIUOY. INS, Mel l "nO NI YM 10 M Y11HltIbY. NIOWnON6.IWlln1
!10 µ1.11U1 IONNIY/ !q 001NIIH11.41.1.1 L II INY. It InwlltOrlN lq YIKne01 NeIO NI eMn N \OKYO I'd IS OKmp YIIHltlo,, OY TEN.
ANT YNIY TENANT nY NOlYl00. In OPrI11NT. Ip Ne UNNerY On NInM lnl llYNe01n11n10Y ' OI Y6" NN OOWTMt.
1. TENANT.NN\ 1. ..A IN. 01em1Yf I... Yn1111Yr And IN IMe MAPS An0 Pal MINI the to" All this MMY. 'Ad to Nlr"pN PO Yn01n
1'A. .A*.,,.. rYMy010 .1 And I., ...NOf6
T. TENANT 1110 lay 'µ, 1111AIIOVoN1 ,11111161 Only,
6. TAM un011YPip TLNANTI, nMlNll or hot In YNII pM1AU10A Or OAS DIS•NY1. Ir. $oin y IMO Pli thly IIe01e 101 HI Iql NLUIIN OYNn11n1
AN OI NN MMInNI.AN, 1., NI OInINI\ O Co. Oano... U N.A. N..Posta OI TeMs" S. Nllr NNY 1n011W11.1
1. II Pay ,g . IY's. OI NOUpIM N' 0eig., 01 ..,Not GAMY IO enforce ANY 0101 0f Imll ANlenonl. Inµ OrNWY6 $any Ne111KAi In lOeulO•
10 !II .11.1 x11111, rY/ON1OIitp N\. NNYllnl l'IOfn1Y 1 INA, wlle1N1101 Met A. 'MAN ONS 1pl to IYplhtim.
le Th. OWNLA 11.1 lN'Ih. I10, ryN111F1 \, YM1i11411.1011N01pY K11 nil VIII INf ONnIHI N YY 01 AN ~t 10 Mlle nK1 /Yry 01
.I... Hlit. 10 YnlOrl IN. II1n1Y/ 10 eIOIONilt10f it1Yl, OYltni•NF IIIIAtL nNYMn N tNNISIYL [If101 In IN. YY 01 fTNINfY 01
1 OINNwM INNIYIYI 1. 4. 1.. IN. Y WA [ A In YI Mv0 TENANT Iwtn1Y•Igvt ,ill NNY IFlnte NNKI, Ino WII in1N avrinl Awm11 ANNA, ...
NN11\ On,y
11. AY YIK 111W., AN". APNI.N t.A,',N lne n0YY 11114 g1NMnl i"A"Ory. I'd Yrvinl""Ne"N"'MY. 1 -A l0rm 0ot1 011NIl ANMn0n1.
iS "'.&..M lno giNn.IY.M it"'.. On111NIN INI On VI AIMmNI NINtn IN. y111YL TNIg ... .O.......Y11GA. n O11101IWO n NYn•
Il OWN[A MA., A M .try IN OiNe •1, INOyP n0 NWt 01 OWNCA. IMO .'IM/ UM01"O11NNq.,.A Qnnl... m\n 410. IN Intl..A'.
Nl TENANT'/ 1.11 "III IYI. Ynlll YIA pW ItIN 11 ONq OI At$0...Illl011.
1A TENANT I\ 1)IAt10 nO 11", 10 wit N NNr INTO INY &real IInla t0 ONN IonNt /.111 OY1 IN., C.'N .
U. Ir Nl TENANT Nill KOO.1 ANSI Ino uO,YIUn at IN. OIm ...w. von IN. IIIYnl It IM OWNCA.tgInNO pt IINOIIeO. /Ytn Ynl.A,
1t11 N IIO'n nOnlMpnenln OA". Ino All A NMwO AI..... AN TENANT IOY110 NY real AN, ... Oto., N11F1 &1 nVNyMM Or A...IM11N 0!p
A.., Ina IIIp 10 AMOCO, wM 01 NONIIOnI n1NOl I., in. INN TCN PAT ..'a, V,P, In Nf I.At INI IM INIMY NUI10 OY IFI\ Alrllnlnl II OII.
NMIIV A npntMinO11A I.N&n11 OI wT11I NIVAAIIV not I nM,M•IOttllllh Nnlnf V. NOYIO "CON'. 10.,M, IM wavall., All this 0... On, tnY
mOAln.lynOnlA YAIKY m!, "INnlnllp0 OI.y OY IM MNnO of A Plrry 1101 My wrltHn Mello In IOOMI OY HIAN Soft, Nan,. 1e IN. .,A.,.
11. Cash !n0 All NFYOM, Nn01 NHI N SINGING YOGA IMO...Ym to INI ".III µ11M MYrL 11.µ101L AOnN1Y111011. - .INAML a, ...'A.$ OI
OWNER. AMR IN ANN• e1KY1NL An0 IOPInN.UION 01 TENANT. IA, ..On I1..1Y1. OI TENANT a NY INgnmgl MY gNn OfN .,to to.
OWNLA'S SMINN AOMM.
17. II fail W Y Umm1Me. O1.1 OMAN " A. n!N OI We NIM". mnl mm, " "0'YN le In. "mt bats asl IA. ... I OOnN.
11. OWNER 0611 A0t " 118410 t0 TENANT IA Oln.1L M! w., -". IN ANY Yn&N.IMOMVt.INO. N 011m col., '..'a ".. in,
vi OI C.T.M.11.O,A., "[YYnll Or IM YO1 OYYOIn1, 01WO..m 01 " .... At..1 IYY... "foam. ,er0N11y.N KhoN. Y I.W In. OWN.
CA Ym.Y r..M N.......ON OY , "tNt 1,600.. 01 YOP.
IS. In m. N "t IM1 IN. ANNONI Pilot. ..to TENANT N. nNll 10 YM I OIIU. MY. WtA N.II " VYO.", .n0 UYyuvelY'a, IM ON...
el .YONAMN.. 1. NNI Ab " YMa 1011. OyINN of ht.NIn1 NY IN.Y\ IM T..A AYIOmoOM,. NO ..Co.... I "N. AM1N YI NIe.1.Y mYlt N
W.nq YO ITIMN- 1-11.1 IN- -..Vold OI TENANT N IA, Iy1pn00111 roll "OHY.O OII I. OIMIML
EQ.... F OWNER at N, OrYN 01 any .... ...0.I110A µ11A "ANYTNI NNI hot pnN11.10 A NANer N WOWY...m.v, . T. .&.I•
..Ilia, 11 OWNER NMI NY Mfwt oI YYt.A....N.II Aat Oe tN11N001. vNN NY ,IN, 01 OWNER 01 h..I..Y AM'.. "N I.. OINYO•
01. I.,ln OI tonminNO N wN1tA. W IYYN Or 1610 NI&ull N NYN. In. OWNER may two 41 IOnm.... YO....... t A..tf.O..... 0,
OWNER MI IOM. N, M All OI IN. I.A..11pK111.0 ON A fAl.,'•O.I NOIIM 1. a.Y Ad" OI ONI NNI AM GN to. OWNCM h., tOmn.ntml AN M'.-
NO O.IAInc 01 "KONI N m"'N,.,On IM nµ11. INN rN IN. An0un110.111.4 On In. n011µ NN to. 0.M.1 M,m.AL
El. TA....n,YA AN.".." AM C.0'.O OY IN. ynOlNynf..O..tl &n0 �� POONn,
IE. ASINt OWNC A'S Oilot A,111.n COn10n1. Ad Slid. 4.,mi Or MI NNI 0...01 A. A.O.NO In A, .... A VIO IMOINL aO.nl.Nasn Onq O,.n n.l
s
And we.I'.n iiMI 10 G.Y. ACM. a w1AMN nav".
N
Elf 10. TENANT .1, ne11V"An lo. IHMNY 0,'YIIn All 10161611 N V It LIAM w11AOC I. oil., AM,IN, C,i NI. OWNER. Ala.... to On.
yNN11NI .11Y1NONt "III A0, " 0NOe0 4 Consent 10 Anti
IN NO MESS W wCMCOR. lo. YYIY.K oohed NI. ANMONt N. data 1118 .00...0i
M,
Y^4� T.nln
-- -• CAIMARK Rc'A� ca'us,r a
TY MANAGEMENT, INC.
MOUSE RULES
v
(,
1 Tne •asleank$' IrhltY and queset Shall hart due regard for the conh,t
Of all Other rssldeA[s
red enjoyment
In the aolrtrunt Cotwanity, Your aplltmant is yore hw1. fr<e
from 1"re"Rencs I'M Mlnagnenf.
ii
unless You or your guest disturb other Parsons.
Occupants and guests shall MI,Lain
Order in Apartment at all tl,n Televisions,
$terra unftt and tusiCsi lnstrueei,n shall not be played
'
At a ralu+e tut nnoys
persoml in at her apartnints.
j Resident$ rust agree not to change or alter lack$ at any Lima
f
unless .rotten
pefel"IPre Is given left ru"gwedt.
G
7. Occupants are 11a1ted to we (1) f"lly and no ware than two j
'
a. Appll"tas,
l
plumbing, heating and Sir conditioning: pill$, check with !y hat rant If
you do not tow raw to
property Ovtratt torte Rent, w will adrlte you J d•tlli> fd
al to get the ultimate perfdrn,wC,.
•
Rdsldeat PeAll torn 0fI neat area ass .non
wlnCwf All door, or, 0p en.
6. Pbaas, Iulimlt maintenance r 4u,ftf the the office phone: (619) 7j5.16se, dvrlrq
business hours 323
SarrlcM are Arjllable after hours for ,(619)
Include /ire. Stohe 1844; title
dad pt, had and near dad ga.
6. Ap,rtR,t dwellers Should Aare Ptrfonsl Theft 6 Fire Insurance. Our buildings art
Covered, but
your Pe"emal belonging, such as tIrt"ts, furniture, etc , are at
7, S+Rning pools And pasta I... are far all rnldbtt ••a .fair guests. Since the
art name
pools utta ty many aoartntnt units the residents MUST NE considerate of the
fast of the rellde,ts In
the hatter of Inv,ting guest,, of the rnlcents tivlmg nerd
amt here first consideration to
as tee use PI ina pool. It it tu9i astb that the
"$teeth girt careful tnocgnt to Inviting guests dvring he -,&
hoary of that the pool is in
ALL 6U(StS Should be regltteted +stn tin Mesa"* -t And
In .111 not be
sllwed In tree Dool unleft atcaimaAted by tot rasldent that nn Invited then.
1. The clubhouse It for the use of ALL RESIDENTS, during Oven hours, for
not Just I few
to enlay, we alb Allow for rtlldentf t0 rettrre tha c1uD for Drlrlte
be
tuft parties TNIf
apDrowed brou9n Na n, 9e *ant and you .111 be responsible far staring the
clean ano
raw
order],. Tau are alb rn Pond Dle tor any cl your guflil was n
damage during may
the Party. cause
9. All cars are "dulled to hire s Hlrltgt Pork iticter In the back .Inaow. CL
Subject to or tVwas
without this Sticker. f art
10, Please DO NOT park you r car by the budding If you leave before 6 A.N. Never back
Into a parking $Pace
by the building, Jt be fives pa Iola ant a0lftMnts and cause
dllconfurt to your neighbors Please help
of to keep your ?Cis NEVER cauD
your car afhtrsy Mesa the lot
11 Plant, fay your •GOddDy s- to yaue guest ins add yaw Jnrtunt if tree, leave at
night. Re COmSidatate of
your neighbors . AT ALL TINES.
lj Plena ask all visitors to Dart In outside Partin, spaces, leaving the
to the buildings far fe,lCent3. %PIC@$ closest
17. Visitors should not bring PETS with Chill, If you h /•t A Pet rtsitlnp, Jltue
the
afftce. notify
14. Swats Mom: Sit,, or snake will set off the atom. the noise
.III not help hu
ate uelt. Turn on the Pon soon ins clove while Coaktng. this will hurt yav cr
the $tan or Photo, tl l0l mte
IS Wnagement rewires that only white backing an Curt,lm be allowed In window, no
Colors,
bents 01 flavor$ Should of tune. Please, if you hart pl"ts, Is your
rtlpanflblltY to put Contains,
a underneath 10 As to catch any water inn n,, leak.
YOU will be held responsible for
,ray eamge that water day do to art carpeting,
,_
IS.t
16. linage "tt Shell have the right to mate such ochre reasonable rules few tin, to ti"
n they lud;e necessary to Pechance ant tltanlbott
and orderliness of the prewltn
and 3Afety and comfort of wcupantf Of
the buildings, NPtic, of any Joel Ipnal rules
red regulatlOml will be to Ur
giver re,ldentt In wrltIAj.
I I t TEAD THE A6OVT ROLES SET FORTH By IN( ROIACENENT IN HERITAGE PARR. AND AGREE
TO AH1D1 91 THEN AT
ALL TIKES.
i
a
weiatwnt
it
r)y' a.fident .e
HOUSE RULES
trf M)11 IIO{ M OIIKn IIIN In• VODOVO'11' V {II{ Y 11001\ •1 YIt OI +TIMI. nY InNOY Ip O+TIM OLL)NOnK 0 /t. O t,
]f [Y Wit ill lawn IlPlvru Vnneut INn 1•t'
LtA 0/ W M{nY leal'A Al' InR +114 M+naa +nY IlMllq
1 ], NNt. YLYA 4 InOV11M •W." PITI14M 01 tn0 )OfRTMI T +n +w 1. _
ea rp'r4V w 441p1ni +•' P. L[]]LL M {ll'It IntYll anY a4w•
DI \rITTIM DPDI +YA Ipa II W ILY„ IM )IIH I0�]0 P Y••
INnf of in 11rvK I n�L11 A v.... 01 Ma LL]fOb anIrMW 1Yl /V +YA f01W 11 lnY llma.M
INi CAP VrIHM \'Y/ Or 0a YMK) \Y /NY M Ln•
y G114•^ •H n4 to toy I 1 ^NI fl•R{ +!a MI 41TtY•O'r Y10Yr6 -a NIM111.411 OI•IVOIn110 W.
OtLL'MIL M• Ipl' IH
y In tMN'4i11M OI OMt0. 1•II + ^la O INw1Wn t VNO by InaT 101 lnf• OM•I
mu \IYI InKNT•nl p ONYIYI { INna.
YnIMb N)rini al a K P.A'eN Ywl not M sKIWLY' OY L[ff [[f o/ MNr M.• 1.4
Nb Y^,NaWIYA MDp)IYwItpIP1-4 a Wrmllw0 tt MY
A T}O raRIPVI•A.allr.rf•� +10111 IPN�aY A`o1P+Rm•:'l
w'a MM NIIO+\m MO\p m.K le{IW Owl 01 M•WIN40r
[, TwaN4M MVM•N VY nOl M'IYa' M IM /e01 MMOVI Prlw VItIM aOnYn1011Pa Tin)i•manl {n0 mV)1 M M \I +IIH )n0 r•TFaO e
00D/y1LfV N eN +1 IITIU' [WIU Nwl M NYllp•D. OIIPNb tnl /M0. O/+ Pwl
W a I1tMIM YI.NYen lltl)Mr, UPOn raTMl a1 tNHNN'n I4MPw. LOf[E +•111 V nnO IYGY 1p )M taTPw tot'-"O.
b Ne a t PpwII +HrV Al. N1YA TnP nwOp UPY+SUA air Li titl Ml111 +.Par'W\ pt MYL
InNO. 01 WP 4aTINA IM. V. K a11Y1MM Ylall n01'• NIwI .11A. O.OIOY•OH111 W ln•
T,• .era OI tM LIILI00 Of )nY'NtlOn 01 WIIPVi L+ � KYw ~I.* vI
IIrNIM {TWr'[ OI flp•\a YLp MY )YIIa01•
L M +n•
IYnIr411111 a,K .I.% *-at Own vy IM wrt4 {4•1•n'N
tM1.1 RM.P Iwp YVY'wCA. DWI'IPI.W MWYA hInIWY )n0 .ONSm•^
agT•A, .0. y �) re".It gOY�n' aYirlHSr�La• Mwni anlpw )na Ip OtT)w\
O' n4M a1Mn.M4p 1 4LL3][L =M /MN M•tt44n\rr1Y.
ryNT.IMb1YYlA+ "*ill'" O.Y/NIIn'artlnt 11.:VIb O1 )nY ONH I[•T rnLOYnaI N),, PC .. V00P1^•O'am\
]0. LLl]ON •NII nOl O• IKOPM14a Ip 10Y'I OIOW T P. NIII Nt)"n.I P." e1 NP l•)RY aN M {D nel p r•Tq•O OY ML L[f•
]], /JIY 01LOP N tvR \In Ia' IDYLII.1 a111•iYlr LESSOR' LLff�al IPYRPI NY RMt ID N\INL1 LL1f [[ le I•mTP +ll n/ MY DI InDY
Kq OY L(]Ws )11•r IMR nPIn1 OOYIMO
CAP, Onwnl NESSOR'1 LL330
twTYP11M Ol inl\ LYY. 11 L[%L[L 1\ w IPRIV 1.01D 00. LL1L[L PT1 \O IPTaM WM
I'll. p +Illal•I .nO 01•aP
S[[ uTY\ nP O9UIn11nP rnll•n )DIr M)I In aertnOL I410Ina In11NI1110n 01 YA YI11. p +Rlw•A a do
MIYDISn T.MIO^•0 In0 V' aaMRIM 11 NYY V^••
M• PI.TIW D+CY �n In• YM
aOw /YUOI OI Va 100N +4'1m•nl M[ rwrNt N[ rwrmnl un CAP Ynn V •n I0e0 ar04.n0 esMlaen. PuL01 +\ t
A Iral. n•nvr ii YIW nmP' on Mt OsavTMl.
1Kt1 ..f an wP \Mt
T.mm
O..LPRAloll
Tf mnl
\1
75
EXRiBV+ E
CS pg4.Cf;D=
provided herein, a
RjW T9 A llEBF;ll�' befote the
Upon filing of a written request as bearing
complainant shall be entitled to
gearing pane l•
meaning owner or his Authorized Agent•
resident whose verses,
I used adversely
a' LZN�L is defined as any or may be and who
status of failure to Owner with
b. sgm4lni�'lfare °L action t with the
duties, d by owner .3 or complain act.
fifes a grievance or failure
0
files such the City Of Rancho
respect t° all mean
as used herein shall with
as any disPu act in
C. Cucaamonra• is defined to
an210, action or any Owner's
d. Ctirl L= 's ac requirements, °L citation of lea Or
re! Owner
accordance with lease 1 Oe uilations�PP face or
et oli
accor ailuce to act s regu duties, wee
application is the
procedures which affects the
state the complainant*
status of
Yu+� Y814B B '' � ni 4C office t
3. SM ssr�+— Co the zmana emen ,sides so that the
&:Y Ss office rto1,enaaiaeusd and settled cOmP a• to the t must
project "'may b enfotmallY cic complain oe by hin
e The 9 evance o of ,
grievance may c: ed in th the owner's
without a hearin9•lainant an clays basis for the
or
signed bye the
resentative within Sea the shall sPecifiy:
s or It to Sac stated, it is but based; and
It may cOund(s) upon which
be
grievance• the
(1) the pecticulceg9eSted. retained by
(2) the action be tetai the Project
complaint d be filed wLth date-
copy Of the copy ohouand�Or copies must be
complainant AlldcO °Plaints by the owner.
Own
manager. All
time of receipt dated and signed
stamped date official,
b. 11n AnSHn Lo cte�'imaano'a°jed ts�mwockin9tdiaintn a
A
by the P in
e deliv enerallY wLth with the comp
shall s time (9 shall be filed
cessonab the answer
copy of
1 r77
the appropriate project office. The answer shall
specify' complaint and the
1 The proposed his therefor. ; the
specific reasons complainant a hearing; and
2. The right of the complainant to
g• The procedure by which a heating 111 be obtained.
ai r�<fied with the proposed
e eenolIIlnLllt 1= ys stated in the Pro�eet
c. IS th.- hint, .s answer, he may
disposition of his complaint,
the co act
manage[ or other owner official Owner oen P e9 est
submit a written fo4uashearing. This written
time of the date of
management office, ten working
shall be made within a reasonable
(genet
al ly
to his complaint
for a heating mast be date -
the answer ro eel
days). The written I ro ciate Owner or rojelt
stamped and filed l0 5 with the comPlaromptly of the
management office el shall be advised ahall schedule the
Tle Hearing C0 riate official; time and
request by the app P possible for a date,
as PromPtlY as P and
hearing convenient to the complainant;
Plaee reasonably lainant
shall inform the °omP r p1e n ��� within the
d• If the F ion d °Ne�� Subsection he Owner's he
ProPosed
his right to the hearing, evane will become final,
disposition of the g
THr HEIM -13 p act The hearing
6 iII
the Owne n and one impartial and
4•
Panel °�1 eonsis�t� °C��ve members; two selected from a s
ointed by alternate) chosen by
of tenants; two app ether with an event that the four
disinterested Panelrmembecs• to
the Hearing tee on the fipbytthe
Hearing Panel members. cannot enber9 shall be appointed elected by
member, then such foff the Hearing Panel shall be uired Eor
The Chairman Three votes shall be teq
City. the Panel.
the members of the Panel.
any decision by on the
a. Panel
quill he III t£lalise n t�h 1l any iofficer
Panel whien hears his complaint; sit as a
or employee whose duties egcievanceoatibissue, Involve
him in anyway Panel for that particular hearing.
member of the Hearing
5. THE HEABM lss) Lsz a fall hest�g before
a. The i dL Lo g
ghgll hE bC represented a counsel re
the Heating Panel and may or
an.,�;,�• person chosen as a representative.
kyb. The heatlnzs Sha11 he Aa L& a`
am
• e = d1q2utg L3 02 X the amount Df rent or other
charges which the Owner claims is due, the complainant
shall deposit the amount in dispute in an escrow account
pending settlement bf the dispute by the Hearing Panel.
If the complainant fails to do so, it shall be
determined that the complainant has waived his right to
the Hearing.
d• if 11 CQMolafnant falls to anon,, at a ne,rinO, the Panel
• may postpone the Hearing for five working days, or may
mike a determination that the complainant has waived his
right to the Hearing.
e. tthe hgAzin h n proofIss on the Complainant case. T complainant
umenta Sn su y Present evidence
and arguments support of his complaint. The Owner
may confront and cross - examine all witnesses on whose
testimony or Information the complaint relies. Hearings
conducted by the Hearing Panel shall be informal, and
any oral or documentary evidence, shall be limited
however to the facts and issues raised by the complaint
and answer, must be received by the Hearing Panel with
regard to whether that evidence would be admisseole
under rules of evidence employed in judicial proceedings.
s6. 12=15 OYe DZ = REAHIM MF.II
a. Th_ tnrieinn Qf the gaariay Pannt shall be based solely
and exclusively upon facts presented at the hearing. To
the extent that the decision is not inconsistent with
State law, and to the extent provided in Subsection c.
below, the decision of the Hearing Panel shall be
binding on the Owner and Complainant.
b. 21P ACAMiMg panel shall JUSMAX.0 Jts wrfteen dncieinn,
Including a statement of findings and COnclusionef as
well as the reasons or basis therefor, upcn all material
issues raised by the patties. This shall be done within
a reasonable time after the date of the hearing. Copies
thereof shall be mailed or delivered to the parties
and /or their representatives.
c. 31 the 11291 211W en is in favor Al tjjg jr_=laianat, the
Owner shall within a reasonable time take all actions
necessary to carry out such decision or refrain from any
action prohibited by such decision unless the Owner's
counsel determines and notifies the complainant in
writing within 30 days that the Hearing Panel has acted
arbitrarily or exceeded its authority. In such event,
the Bearing Panel's decision may be judicially reviewed.
�7 ;Lw , yy ATE Pocwren$
a• if the Truant Las rnnun11-2d a btaLing on the proposed
71
c
eviction and the Hearing Panel by its decision upholds
• the Owner's or project management's proposal to evict,
an action to regain possession may not be commenced
until after the Tenant's right to use and /or occupy the
premiss has been terminated by lawful notice. Such
notico to vacate may not be given prior to the date on
which the Hearing Panel's decision upholding the
proposed eviction is'delivered or mailed to the Tenant.
a
b. "An such not' U saadte IS SIM= 12 thn Teach:, he
must be informed in writing that:
(1) If he fails to quit the premises within three days,
appropriate legal action (dependent on state law)
will be brought against him;
(2) If suit is brought against him, he may be required
to pay Court costs and attorney fees incurred.
4
20
•
2.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: february 1, 1984 .
TO: city Council and City Manager
FROM Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 82 -2
Attached is an order of procedure giving a series of actions required to enter
the final formation stages for the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District.
These resolutions and actions basically authorize the following:
1 Preliminary approval of the Engineers Report delineating the method of
assessment spread and preliminary assessments
2 Approves the Plan, Specifications and Estimates and authorizes bidding of
the construction contract.
3 Authorization for sale of bonds.
4 Setting the hearing date of March 21, 1984.
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT PROGRAM
The District is designed to assess all developable properties within the
drainage boundary to construct upper portions of the Alta Loma Channel and
tributary storm drains. In addition, the project will construct debris basins
and e.epand the existing flood control detention basins Total esti,aated
construction cost is $3,300 000. Incidental and financing cost increases the
District cost to 54,650.ODO.
The acroage of assessment is approximately 610 acres The acreage charge at
this time is approximately 57,600.00 per acre.
A Key element of the assessment spread is the determination of adjustments for
partial development In cases of partial development, the following rules
were applied to develop the acreage to assessment
V
i
CITY COUNCIL ST.1FF REPORT
Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 82 -2
February 1, 1084
Page 2
Adjustment for Partial Development In seven of the benefited parcels, it
thou a note tat the land Is partially developed In conforming use Since
these properties are capable of subsequent subdivision, they would be subject
to the drainage fee. An estimate has been made of the degree of development
accomplished in each of the seven lots An adjustment factor to the
Partially developed acreages was accomplished by using the lesser of the two
following evaluations:
A The necessary land required for the use of the developed portion of
the lots was considered in computing a factor to calculate the remaining
undeveloped land available. As an example, a five (5) acre parcel containing
one acre of land to preserve the current conforming use indicated a .800
factor, which when multiplied against the gross acreage, would show a four (4)
acres remaining undeveloped portion of the property.
B. As an alternative, a comparison of the land AV and improvement AV was
made on each parcel that was partially developed to conforming use. Using a
factor of land AV versus Improvement AV as being equal to constitute
development, calculation of the remaining land for development of each
partially developed parcel
wUnder these rules some two and three acre parcels were excluded
STATUS OF DISTRICT
Several workshops have been held with property owners and a number of
potential protests have been identified At this time, it would appear that
over 60% of the assessed area involves tracts who have petitioned for and
support the District as a means to facilitate development. It is likely that
nearly 20% of the ownership represents potential protest These protests can
be broken into two distinct categories: First, small 5 to 10 acre partially
developed long time ownerships who have no immediate plans for deve loµment and
would face difficulty in meeting assessment payments Second, are poultry
ranches which are currently to active use and do not have plans to relocate in
the forseeable future. The ranches would, however, likely develop as
residential at sometime in the future
All of these lands are developable and would be exposed to future fee
obligations and fall in the cateogry of benefiting properties It would not
be ossible under the philosophy of the District to exclude these lands from
assessment The only method of alleviating the impact on most of these
properties is to develop an agreement with owners under which the City would
carry as,essments for the owner to some fixed time At such time, all charges
would have to be reimbursed the consultant recommends that this approach
only be applied to partially developed and non - conforming uses This appoach
and draft agreements are currently be' D developed by the consultant and will
be available for discussion at the Council meeting This approach could place
the City in the position of banker for a portion of 'he project. Total
�l
CITY COuNCIL STAFF REPORT
Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 82 -2
February l
Page 3
obligation under this approach could approach s50o'lle over time. Over
drainage nefromodrainage i or the
systems drainage fe
$75,DO0 of thlremainderbwouldelavebto be
area but the
funds
It would be staff's recommenof th to pursue this approach. rss the
I will be meeting with each of the Council prior to the meeting to discuss the
District to more detail and will forward the draft participation
agreement
when it has been completed.
RECOMENDATIOM
It is recocnended that the Council proceed with the ac uin plstrtct formation
order of Proce19u8e and fix the date for Public Hearing
for !larch 21,
Respectfully subm tted,
!�! LO • as
Attachnents
E
-& 3
Ll
OROEI OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF RANCHO CiCAMOGA
ASSESVENT DISTRICT NO 02 -2
(ALTA -OVA FLOOD CONTROL OURVIE0
DATE DE MEETING
JN UARY 18, 1484
STAFF:
Gewa1 >eitnt at ion of 1w djlles of ASlsirenl District
C :TY COUALIL
Moot RESOLUTIDN COVERING PRELIMIMRY OCTENIMI104: Initlattng
Resolution for Aiseisapnt District or",Wjngs
STAFF
P'lartati0n of Debt Actor. pursuant to the W,Ylsions Of the
•Sped al Asset seers inrnttgatlon. Llettatlon am MAlort ty
Protest Act of 19718
CITY COUNCIL
AdODt RESOLUTION APPROVING WORT AND SETTING PUA!IC NEARING
STUr
Present Engineer S - Reoo't- DunfVlet tD lKf VDYlSIO,S of .,.j.
C1081 I"rOre Dt Mt Of 1913' consisclnq of t" f0110viq-
1 Plant
2 Swif cItivs
S Cost (ftlwte
4 Aife{see,t Roll
S Al StSteent Dlagrm,
CITY (oLNCIL
Moot RESOLUTION P /SSING,, ON REPORT AND SETTING PUBLIC NCAgl G
Sets public heist., on -1915 Act- ',queer's 'AmOn'
City COWICIL
Moot PESDIUTT)N MTIVRIZING SALE OF BONDS This Resolution
authgrl DCi Pe sate f bOMS to flmn -e the IrorpYMnt1
CITY COUNCIL
Br Ibtion. mprore ant authorize eae'utlpn of Agreerent WtMeen
CITY im 9WO OF 9NERYISONS was 'a to C ersftlD, etc of
,
f?ou control cr,rrel leprpYRRnI
IMPOSED SCh EDIILE
)AVIARY IP 1984
ADOPT ALL INTRODUCTORY MD JJVISOICT!GML RESOLUTIONS
ON 111OCEEDIMGS, AUTM0III( BIDW G 0.4 WORKS Or IMPROVE.
WEST AND' -r OF BONDS
M1rch 9, 1984
DATE FOR RECEIP' OF CONSTRUCTION BIDS
PRIOR TO PUBLIC NEARING. DATE FOR RECEIPT 7 BOND BIDS
MUCH 21, 1984
PUBLIC. NEARING TO CDNSICER CAPERING OF INPgOVEVENTS
AND CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
i
DATE: January 26, 1984
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineery 1 -�
SUBJECT: Alta Loma Channel Assessment/ Dristrict Loan Application
lc,UCAafo
C�
U�
1m7 I
Attached for Council's information 1s a Preliminary Loan Application
spelling out all the provisions of the proposed loan program. This
appii�ation will be reviewed with eligible property owners on Thursday,
January 26, 1984 Based on the results of that meeting, Staff will
final!ze an agreement proposal for Council review an February 1, 1984.
1 w117 discuss the meeting with each of the Council prior to the meeting
LBH:Jaa
0
r
z!
C
PREL:NINARY ATSESSHENT DISTRICT
LDAN APPLICATION FORM
WEREAS, the CITY COIACIL of the CITY OF RAeCNO DJCA"WA. CALIFORNIA, is Conducting
proceedings for the 4rw00n of a special usessrent district for certain Drainage
Lproveaents, pursuant to the Tama and vo,lsions of the -Municipal loeroreeent Act
of 1911•, Wind Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State Of
California, sold special aistswenl district 'wing known and dee19nated as
ASSCSSHENT DISTRICT NO. 82.2
(ALTA LW FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT)
(hereinafter "felled to as the 'ASeseent District -):, and.
WEREAS, inasel,h S the Prieary benefit for the Alietsadnt District is the right to
develop unde.11CP d land, the City Council is desirous to wke fuheS available IS A
Imo to certain Properly owners whose parcels qualify either IS Partially devdeem
or nabsnnfonlrq, all As shown in the E091neer't -Pnon- for the apore- referaeed
Asaesownt Oisttict: ono,
WER[AS, said loan •Ill be wde available to those parcels who Submit the appropriate
lain VPIICatlos W who qualify, and wool said loll Ming woe available, the
®
pr,p.rty (area perioAgree
of elan (10)fyearscfrmft a "it owill Sold 1 a� converted to any
NDN, TNEREFWE, it is a S.311y agreed between the undersigned Property mwners and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
I That loan applications will W -_w available for all parsons ,no sign on this
prellalnary Asess"nL miStrict Laan APPIICatlon form.
2 That If the undersigned property o+mers auall /y, 'nnwKr S their Property 11
within the Class of partially developed or non- conforming, that lain finds rill
be wde uellable to assist in the payment of their assesswent
y Bath partite wtually Wee that sold Properties shall trot be converted to any
other uwe m further developed for a v -lod of bmn (10) years frog the pate of
seta loan
Said loan shall bear Interest frm Its date at the rate of ten Percent (10%). and
w shall W all due asd Payable upon the uplrat1cm of said ten (10) year term, Of
may be deferred will tit issuamce of any Parmit for further d,eloCeent Won
the aairetlon of sold ten, sold loan shall continue to pear Interest
5 My Ssess" is for the 11th year amfor Su sauutnt years will be collected on
the to rolls if nl dlsoharged at that Sloe
6 The undersigned Vopany owners hereby f—wsw• Rlre any right to Protest Pr
Object to the formaVol Of the Cove -re .n 41ussrent District. Luc fists
reserve the right s protest Or object a a t e aerhdd and formula for the
SPrrad of Asiestwnla
7 The oidersignsa XcPtrty wmers further ackmewltd" that any PrePaywrl Of any
assessmnt will not waive or accelerate the ten (10f yen ten, n sat forth In
this Agreexnt
E (n
V
S
e. It Is wtua)ly understood that an Agreement NIT G executed y the property
owners, secured by a deed of trust, to corer all loan advances as dude pxsuant
to this preliminary loan A;ollcation.
9. The undersigned prcoerty Demers art desirous of recefvtra loan contribution
funds to assist In the parent of their ssessorat
I0. This Agrteeent my be terminated at an earlier data by the Drooerty Amer giving
five (5) years helical notice to the public Works Ofrectoe, of the City, and Po.
Party amer shell, upon the explydvlon of said five (5) year time, Dry Interest
for the remajoin; Glance of the loan agreeeent
OFT( Pq(p(Aly ( SERIRTI ON K
PROPERTY SIGNATURE OWNER
•
RESOLUTIOY NO. y=t
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ME
CITY Or RARCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIrORN1A,
APPROVING A REPORT :TER ME •SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT-IhVESrIWT104 LIMITATION
AND NAJ0411Y rROTEST ALT OF 1931- MO
FILING A DATE Or MFARIMG TNEREM
RMFREAS. the CITY COUNCIL Of the CITY ITY OF RANEOO CUCNWNGA, CALIFORNIA, Nat OF Re'Solo.
tIon ordered the eeoatlon of a •Report• WRIT the Vol t Ions of the •S;tcNl
Astesiant Inrettlnli0A, LlNltatlon vM NUorftY Irotest Act or •971• Deem Olrl-
cMftrd[tlMe Stretrt and xlphNayt Code o• the Stale of Catlfernl•, rflalind IO tlr,
kmen and designated aaf Public Norki of trProrKrent in a ittclb asstssfent dlltrict
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Al. p2.2
(ALTA LOA FLOOD CONTROL EMANYEL)
(hereinafter referrld to as the •Atsessrent Olstrict•1: said Norkf of I- yroretent
generally described as fol to"
The construction of certain crainagt IrNSrovements, f0oether Nth applNtmtnen,
I m ludlnt, but eat IIe1tM to, the instal lallon of concrete channel fats l It in, Dos
culvert lm'o antl, 11101 COs In eACaratien and eerthdm construction, imiudlm
alt 400urltnant street am other AOrk regal -ed for &Old i=rdvement4, in a special
asseslant district TARN" and 4slmated as ASSESSMENT OISTAICT NO. 82 -2 (ALTA LO'EI
FLOOD CONTROL CNANMELI, and,
WhIsEAS, suer Report• has been cregared and subdltted to this Guncil
M011, THEP' AE, IT IS MEREST RESOLYFO AS FOLLOWS.
SECTIP, 1 That the above rerilals are true arms correct
SEC ON 7 Met the °Reod • so Preoared and presented be, aAl the sent Is acwco te,
anJ the fact end date Of this YOor"al shall be tGorsed theroon and the
'Reoort° shall be filed Nlth the transc,lot of thest tr'o(eedlms
5EC•10Y S. MAY THIS CITY COUNCIL ODES HEREBY F;1 tN691
MOOR OF r•SO O'CLOCK P N in ME COUNCIL CMAN9ERSS 1[IIWY, ISSA, AC ME
TIME AND RACE WEN A NEARING ON SAID •REPOR SsALI RE HELD. LL. AS THE CLERK SMALL AIVE NVTiCE OF SINY NEARING BY NI' IMP A COPY ME NOTICE,
POSTAGE REPAID TO ALL PERSONS WgllaG RLAL Kift WICM IS NE NOTD TO
RE ASSESSED TO PAY Att PART tF ME COST (P NOgK MfISE PROPOSED 4'D
'ADDRESSES APPEAR ON ME U5r EWAL RED ASSESSMENT POLL AVAILABLE ON ME
ALL IN ME EMANFER WAS
ROD FORM MAS DROYI CO rALpRW [INS SAID YISION aW(F POLL.
Sm[fi5 AND uIOMYArS Epp[ 6 rME
STAFF IF rar,rra.,.
PASSED. APPROVED am ADOPTED this day OE
�, 1006
AYES-
ROES
LASSERT
ATTEST
L ft--Aw. D
R That the boundaries of the AaeSsrenl District and tM lands aM Ci
• Cortics within the ASSessaent District Proposed to N as St Sted 0 pay
the costs and eapenses of said molosed works Of ttpro "nt are is
shown upon A Mso of the ASSt'slrtnt Ulst'Itl. which Hp no$ been Keret0-
fare Approval AM 1t on H11 with the transcript of these NpceARIN41
S:ld No shall Myer, for t11 debut AS to the "tent of the Assets -
nent District
SECTION 3. Not its statute under which It It Proposed to conduct oroceelloas IS too
- munielpal Inoroverient Act of 1913• be,na Division 12 of the Streets AM
Hiahways Code of the State of California, with bonds Mapofed to to issued
at wthorked by the - LCrdrtrtnt 90M 4t of 191Aa balm Division 10 of
Bald Code
SECTION A that this oraposed Is ray ... 0 to the ASSESSMENT ENGIREER, Mo
Is werety ""Intel to Procure oll necessary Infonaticn to prepare a
recon on the Morita irororrtnt In ue aWnrer and fort provided for In
Division a Of the Streets and 410wayt Code of the State of California. the
- SOeclat AtsessM•t Inwtstloatlon Limitation AM Majority PlGtest Act Of
1031 -
SEr TIOM S Net this - u%Olution and tre Retort as ordered herein are pursuant to the
pro,1610M of said Olylslan a
SECTION A No' said geoort Ovsuart to 91vlslOn A sill wave attached to It a copy
ae tnit R"Olution upon its adoption
L SECTION rhat the works of I"roveoent e• preoosed to be Constructed under these
proceeds +as, centrally consist of the follcwlm
Tee :pnktraetipn o' tertalo Maimat ISprpreeents, together With Mpurt.
"Nett IKludsna but M< 1l mltrd lo. Ve nstallit {On of Concr -te channel
facilities bat Culvert Imnrove'enlk debrlt NfN excavation AM farthdi
construction. IMludln0 A) w ten Nl street LM other .ark reaulred for sold
1rDrayerontf, In a $Will else%S=tmt nl Strict known and desi0ndted a
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 40. A2.2 (ALTA L(yA FE000 CONTROL CHANNEL)
75
s
AESOLUTSON NO .2i.�t. �.��c(
IESCLUTION CF THE City COUNCIL IF THE
CITY OF RANCHO Ci)CA40NGA. CALIFORNIA.
COVERI'd PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION AND
ORDERING THE PRERAR..TION CV A REPuRT ON
SAID IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY Cr RANCHO CUCAM043i. CALIFORNIA. Is cent mplatlnq
the crostructica of Certain [011c wo.k: of Lvrmarcnt under prOccedin)S cmWucted
pursuant to the 'Nunlcloal Iryrovement Ac[ of 10136• Delim Division 1' of the Streets
And Hlphways Lode of the State of California In A special asfeSShnt district known IS
I
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02.2
(AL -A LOA FLOOD CONTROL CHANHEI I
(herelnifbr referred to as the 'Asses scent Ofstrict -I
NOW, THEREFORE. IT IS KIES RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS
SECTION I Not the above recitals are all .rue and correct
SECTION 2. That certain public works of lodrov"ot, together with eapurttnances and
appurtenant work Ircludina Acquisition where necessary. are proposed to be
d'MC ems Nde within the boundaries , the Ass-aunt District In cOnnK-
tion therewith It Is found and dettraloed as follows:
A Nat the specific nature a- the Proposed was Of IMcrMaen' consists
Of all the work as sICM on the bloodied dWndary rap, as Previously
apo,"ed far t"s ASsessxnt District
R That the boundaries of the AaeSsrenl District and tM lands aM Ci
• Cortics within the ASSessaent District Proposed to N as St Sted 0 pay
the costs and eapenses of said molosed works Of ttpro "nt are is
shown upon A Mso of the ASSt'slrtnt Ulst'Itl. which Hp no$ been Keret0-
fare Approval AM 1t on H11 with the transcript of these NpceARIN41
S:ld No shall Myer, for t11 debut AS to the "tent of the Assets -
nent District
SECTION 3. Not its statute under which It It Proposed to conduct oroceelloas IS too
- munielpal Inoroverient Act of 1913• be,na Division 12 of the Streets AM
Hiahways Code of the State of California, with bonds Mapofed to to issued
at wthorked by the - LCrdrtrtnt 90M 4t of 191Aa balm Division 10 of
Bald Code
SECTION A that this oraposed Is ray ... 0 to the ASSESSMENT ENGIREER, Mo
Is werety ""Intel to Procure oll necessary Infonaticn to prepare a
recon on the Morita irororrtnt In ue aWnrer and fort provided for In
Division a Of the Streets and 410wayt Code of the State of California. the
- SOeclat AtsessM•t Inwtstloatlon Limitation AM Majority PlGtest Act Of
1031 -
SEr TIOM S Net this - u%Olution and tre Retort as ordered herein are pursuant to the
pro,1610M of said Olylslan a
SECTION A No' said geoort Ovsuart to 91vlslOn A sill wave attached to It a copy
ae tnit R"Olution upon its adoption
L SECTION rhat the works of I"roveoent e• preoosed to be Constructed under these
proceeds +as, centrally consist of the follcwlm
Tee :pnktraetipn o' tertalo Maimat ISprpreeents, together With Mpurt.
"Nett IKludsna but M< 1l mltrd lo. Ve nstallit {On of Concr -te channel
facilities bat Culvert Imnrove'enlk debrlt NfN excavation AM farthdi
construction. IMludln0 A) w ten Nl street LM other .ark reaulred for sold
1rDrayerontf, In a $Will else%S=tmt nl Strict known and desi0ndted a
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 40. A2.2 (ALTA L(yA FE000 CONTROL CHANNEL)
75
9
SECTION A Met this COOnatl does not at this tiro, Intend to Aaha enw contribution
or ADDro2rlatlon of fwAdS toward any of the costs ,v uoenses of the
wOr4 Of Iap ,"At H provided under these nrpcftdlrof, a, all Cost$
eeenl'cif 'led -PP" bwafltt tI'M%lIN aopertln within tithe soccial bWftdlrlesfof
Lie Asfasfuent Dlstrlct In tea amwr and forty AS eftabllshed by law
PASSED, APPROVED ub ADCO•1 nl' ]q of
I AYES
holy
ASSENT
ATTEST-
0
\i I
9r,
• AESOLUrlfd NO. Ft/- /
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CORCIL OF WE
CITY OF RAACNO CLCAVOW.A. CALIFORNIA.
PASSING OR THE 'REPORT' OF THE ENGINEER,
GIYINS PRELIe1MRT APPROVAL, AND SETTING
A TIRE AND PUCE RID PICLIC HEITRIM
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of thr CITY OF RMOO IAICROYJ. CALIFORNIA, Ms Imtitut"
P,octeelnal for the conitrlstios of certain "Ile saris of barwee /[ and obviate.
"ante, eider IAw111onf of the •1MICIPaI Imrwelent Act of 19:3•, balm Division 12
If the Streets And Hlohts" Code M the State of California in a sperial assessant
district knows aid deslanated as
ASSESSRENT 01'I ICT Iq. 02-2
IALTA LOU FLM L'S.TpLI WARRED
(hereinafter referred to as the •Asselsaen District-): Sid,
WHEREAS, there has been Prmarce and fused with the City Council a'Reoort• Drwid"
for in Sections 10203 and 102"4 of Use Streets and 41divays Code of the State of
California, aM this "Rod. * has been presented for cutnlderation: ",
WHEREAS, a Pnolutim of lrlmtton for this t.arweaent win w "lously Adopted by the
City Council: W the •Restore• as now wesewted shall stb4 as the •Repast• for the
prWse of subl"urte par Nlnaf henHVWr.
NOW, THEREFORE, If IS MEREST RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
sterfam 1 That the nowt recitals are it true and correct
SECTION 2. That the •Report• of the Enamel? "Ferree U serelnaDwa Is cornidnAd
.Coot", Passed upon, And orell.lncrlly oprw", cs follows:
A. That ten plans, and Swcifications for the Rows" I"Srwenentf to be
Nude. contained in Sold •Report• be, And they arc hereby Yrelltl-
narlly aorwed and! adopt":
9 That the Enalneer•s "tltate of the ants" aid total costs And
tapmsn of laid acanis It Ion. ,Nre necessary. and 4prwwiMll. and
Of the Incidental "Pent" in COvhectlaa therewith. cantata" In said
'Report'. be, and each of Show are Mmy Rellwlnarlly obprov" and
adopt":
C That Me discrete slnwlna the Aslessttttd District rtfe "m W ark
described In said Resolution of Intention. And dip the bourda "n
and dl^enslmp of the rnoectly- LDdivtslons of land within SoId
Asseswet District, is the sane nlst" at the tied of the "ISaoe
of fold Resolutlm of Intention, each of which s dtvlsiora have been
al," A wo.rate nwaer noun Sold di craw. as contained In said
'AM"- be, and It IS hereby erelltlnrlly corm" an0 Admlee:
D.NTHat the MOMS" asusl^ent Soon the Swnal subdivisions of land to
III ASwsiRnl nl Strlrl In PPPCrtlon to the estlgtee Wiltifts b
be recelved by Such subdivisions, re;mtleely. Trot sold Icouisitlon
aid Irorov"nts and of VF IMdertal "Deists thr "f AS cov.-
tnneo In Slid •PtOort• be rc they are hereby prell.inrlly Rep-
r roved aid tdotit"
I THIS the Mf Art CeSVlotions of the IaMt and eafirentl to be
)cpulred IS tmtnin" In slid 'wort' be• as the •Js, p! hereby
L prelltinarl lv tDDrav"
i
F That NIO
' a Pe [nslrnr v A for the
D t DT I)$ sulD,eit Drd,t "IONS ay to sdid ^S01 • +•
, f Intention
9`"� Q'
SECTION I
SECTION I. met the Cite Clerk is hereby directed to atve notice of said Public
the Al by ouslna to It . Mattroe ti en 300 tfCeet p III
artman
on eachestreet within
m
the ASttsWnt District.
pose Of elntetl IM than
a/ylMf a itiNutlon fall ` in, Accordance with the
.rdri.lanS of said Division It
SECTION S. Hearin, City Clerk
of Vt oa3efeat Or tie eNuSolution of Inlentlan of am this coo.
tut 1011 eY Qaf irw ftKh rUit,, I, nc pwilshed In Accordance with Section
6066 of the Gorerarnt Code in the fewlo,per orertoutly Mcionatm u
%a ddvSle[ r of UII AtfN nt�1 Diflrleal aired by lu and M necetary
SE[ilVe / NenieaM m the Clerk
adootlan Of rise Resolution Of Nil tention am Of, tine flll-
O/ tht 'Re00ti♦•nntf /tiM Krdrtffess Appear on the�aItYeq.Wted assess•
/.Sassed, ar es tsars to said City Clerk,
O rent roll for City Gus stir thereto.
and l0 All Other Mr.Cnf as Refcrihed In KCOrd /nU rllh the prprlSlOnf
t Of St,d D1re3W I! Of the
SECTION 1 That
roOORd oow�OOY up is in the Office of rPa County Retorcr within MCA"
115) days rr the Adoption of the preposed Doundary e.a: Said boundary et$
tope Ml ahr the amt TOM asO�a[ei ftforth n Division
a.5 a/ tnt Slrtet.
PASSED. KPRONEO, " PTED this — day of , 1 a
A A aJ
ATTEST
l
21
Av[S:
NOES.
ARSEK:
z
E
It7
RESOLUTION Ng,. B it '.L -I—
IT ESOLUT104 O' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RMDHO CUCAN&%GA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SPECIAL ASSESS.
fQNT BONDS TO FI WI[E IIIPROVEIIENTS IN A
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RAXCHO CUCAHONGA. CALIFORNIA, has Initiated
Proceedings pursuant to the lens and conditions of the 'Municipal Iearovennt Act of
1911, being Divitson 12 of two Steels and Hiahweys Code of the State of California,
for-the constructlo, ce certain public worts of taprov"nt, Weather with adPYrtet
nances News acquisition. where necessary. In a smcIJ assessment cistrlcl: sold
sRacial asteaaot district know, and aslOnated as
ASSESSNENT DISTRICT Ng,. Bbl
(ALTA LW FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL)
(hrrelnaRtr referred to as the *Assessment District'): and,
WIPERS, It he, been further determined that serial bonds shall be Issued to fine"
tee costs and eacenief Of Said Improvennts W proceedings and said bonds shall be
Issued pursuant to tea tress and prOVISIC a Of the 'Imorovdant Bond Act of IBIS,
being 01Y16ion 10 of the Streets and Highways Code Of the State of California: and,
WHEREAS, at ends tlm, this City Council Is desirous Of authertsing the Pala of bands
to flnandg the woreS of hgroveeenl as proposed for this Assessrent District
NPR, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS
Sfrr103 I That the above recitals are all true And correct
SECTION 2 That the FINANCIAL CONSULTANT Is hereby authorized to Solicit a proposal
or proposals for the Sale of bondt for the Acusswent District The
tnlerett rate m slid ponds snail not emceed the current legal maalmn
rate of twelve oerct.t 11211 per Annie Said WMS SMII be Issued
Pursuant to the terms AM corutttlonf as set forth In the Resolution of
Intention as pevlausly adopted for these proceedings
SECTION 7. That this Resolution Is alerted mvsuant to the Mo,ISlanS of Section
14602 Of the Street% ins Highways Once of the State of California, and it
IS further directed that all recone,endatl0ns relating, to the sale of
bonds M presented to this body no latter than the tie set for the Public
Nearing a. the 'Report' AM related tillers for this Assesinent district
SEC, v a. Pat there will be errvided, at no users& to the bldder, the corM1ind
legal opinion of F FACAENZIE MOWN, Attorney at Law, attesting to tea
validity of the Proceedings And the enforceaallily of tre Dohs
SECTION S. Pat pursuant to the pro+lsions of Section 10600 S. it is hereby eter.
&Insd that the ponds snail pear Interest frm their data, and in* date of
1 the fiords -hall 'wiF4._ 17 Y3 Or the Slat Ny after recordation Of
it, aisestmnt tali and dNarm, mlehover Is later
SECTION 6. Met the INFORNATIOI FOR BIDDERS re"ti, to the Sale of assessm.t rents
for the Assesseent D,Strict IS rertoy a»roved. And for further pwrticu-
I✓s reference Is rude to said INFORHATICA FOR BIDDERS peeaage m file
din the transcript of these Proceedings The Flnamitl COniultant Is
1 hereby wllorlted to hate ether mdlf ICAtlans and ent�,nts to the
L INORMTION FOR BIOOERS "cease 1n order to movtae the Pest "li able
Inforrutlon up to the data NM tied far the Sale
SECTION F Met In the event of any delinguetcy In tv dayvent of Any InFtglhent of
In ats<ssheht, It 1: nereb ceerraate" ., tr twe kilter of the Ponds that
this City reuntll del Cluie to be t 9'enc•d sno thereafter dlligcntly
oriSecuteo. ludlcfal forKlowre r can Inds .11, all delinquent meals
G=
0
E
mets<nts coon the soeclflc tens. Lim and ca.ditlons as set forth In
the bidding docwhents relatlna to the sale of bands It Is farther
hereby ordered that An Investigation be initiated as soon as Possible
each year to detemine all tad dellnauencles do all arooertlee within the
boundaries of the mare referenced Assess,em Dlstrct
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADGTED this _ day of , 19PA
AYES:
NOES:
ASSENT:
ATTEST-
ay
21
•
J-A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM Lloyd 8 Hubbs, City Ergineer
SUBJECT Day Creek Community Facilities Act District
GUGafp ^,
Cy
� � r
C�
}F A A
J v �
1977
Submitted for Council approval is a series of resolutions in'tiating
proceedings leading to an election to form a Community Facilities District for
the construction of Day Creek. The resolutions are described on the attached
Order of Procedure. The key resolution sets a Public Hearing date for March
7, 1984, On that date, property owners will be given an opportunity to
protest the District election. If 50% by area protest, the proceedings are
abandoned, 11 the protest is less than 50%, the Council has the option of
calling for an election on the taxing district formation and authorizing bond
sale. The election must be held between 90 and 120 days after the Public
Hearing
The election would be a property owner election requiring a 2/3 vote by area
for passage The ballot would be a mailed ballot to each property owner
within the District boundary
The Di "trict program is outlined in detail to the attached preliminary
"Engineer's Tax Apportionment Report ". This rcport basically calls for a
maximum tax rate sufficient to bond a program amount of 520,255,000 with a
minimum commitment of $500,000 from Redevelopment funds to retire the debt
The maximun tax rate would be $550 per ac,e per year.
As the Day Creek tax increment increds "s, the tax rate could be reduced, at
some point the tax rate would no longer be req-llred. The District tax is only
a bridge financing conduit to allow early completion of Day Creek to avoid
costly interim drainage and flood protection measures
CITY OF ONTARIO DISTRICT
The City of Ontario is proceeding with a parallel district to establish a
similar 5550 per acre tax with the Day Creek watershed in Ontario. They are
30 days ahead of our program and will hold the Public Hearing on February 1,
1984 They have several commitments from land owners in the area and are
optimistic about chances of passages
It should be pointed out that the proposed program includes some $3.5 million
in funds for basin expansion which will occur in the City of Ontario. This
obligation represents the prorata share of cost spelled out in the Day Creek
Implementation Plan.
q <
City Council Staff keport
Day Creek Community Facilities Act District
February 1, 1984
Page 2
:.
CONCLUSION: Proceeding with the proposed program, if successful, will
complete the unique cocperative effort between ourselves. Ontario and both
County Flood Control Districts to fund an unprecedented major facility. Staff
would recommend proceeding with the program by adopting the resolutions as
outlined in the Order of Procedure.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:I
Ca r
,
PRELIMINARY
Community Facilities District No. 84-1
for the
Day City Cof Rancho nCucamonga
Engineer's Tax Apportionment Report
Mello Roos community Facilities Act of 1982
Prepared by:
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
290 South Anaheimrnla le 92805100
Anohelm,
714 -774 -5740
213- 924-1631
Q7
i
Community Facilities District No 94 -1
Day Creek Drainage System
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineer's Tax Apportionment Report
Aiello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pao
I
Introduction
1
II
Legal Authority to Construct Facilities
2
III
Description of Facilities
2
IV
Boundaries of District
4
A) Description
4
B) Boundo Qualification
5
C) Zones
6
•
D) Zone Discussion
6
V
Cost Estimate
8
Cost Estimate Chart - Total District
8
VI
Explanation of Cost Estimate
8
A) Payment by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
8
':ost Estimate : Facility Summary
10
B) Construction Costs
11
C) Redevelopment Agency Contr!butlon
11
D) Contingency Fund
11
E, Water Reclamation Facilities
12
F) Other Fund Sources
12
VII
Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax
13
A) Rate of Special Tax
13
B) Gross Area
13
C) Special Tax Rate Reduction
14
VIII
Secondary System
15
IX
Apportionment
15
X
Total Pay -Off - Special Tax
16
XI
Drainage Boundary Adjustments
17
21
DI
Community Facilities District No. 87 -1
Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
REPORT
Engineer's Tax Apport!onment Report
Day Creek Drainage System
City of Rancho Cucamonga
I Introduction
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California (hereinafter referred to as the "I�gislative body of the local
agency ") did, pursuant to the provisions of the Mello Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2 5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of
the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Section
53327 thereof, expressly order the filing of a written report with the
local Agency for a proposed Community Facilities District. This Commu-
nity Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as
Community Facilities District No. 84-1
for the Day Creek Drainage System
(hereinafter referred to as the "district "); and
WHEREAS the Resolution ordering said report did direct that said
report oenera'ly contain the following:
1) A description of the public capital facilities I t,posed for the
project;
2) A general description of the area to be served by said facll-
Ities; said areas being the boundaries of the district;
3) A cost estimate, setting forth the costs and expenses for
providing the public facilities to the properties within the
boundaries of the district;
-2-
L) The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax In
sufficient detail to allow each landowner or resident within the
proposed district to estimate the annual amount of payment.
For particulars, reference Is made to the Resolution of Intention and
Resolution ordering the Report as previously approved and adopted
NOW, THEREFORE, I, William C. Stookey authorized representa-
tive for WILLDAN ASSOCIATES, the appointed Ei,glneer of Work, pur-
suant to the provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of
1982 ", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government
Code of the State of California, do hereby submit the following data:
II dal Authority to Construct Facilities
S The proposed facilities are facilities which the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga Is authorized by law to construct, own or oper-
ate,
111 Description of Facilities
A Community Facilities District may provide for the purchase, construc-
tion, expansion or rehabilitaton of any real or other tangible property
with an estimated useful life of five (5) years or longer, which Is
necessary to meet Increased demands placed upon local agencies as a
result of development or rehabilitation occurring within the district.
A general description of the proposed facilities per Day. Etiwanda and
San Sevaine Creeks System Drainage Plan by BIII Mann 6 Associates,
March 1983 Is as follows:
® 1) Primary drainage facilities to serve Zone: A and B:
-2- ; , J
Debris Basin: Flood control retention and water reclamation basin
In the unincorporated area north of the City
Day Creek: Flood control channel improvement from the uebrls
basin to the northerly City Ilmlt Ilne of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Day Creek Flood control channel construction from Higtiland
Avenue to ath Street within the City of Rancho Cucamo^ga
2) payment to the contracting authority In the City of Ontario for
Dav Crete Channel through Its boundaries together
completion of the
vllle and Riverside Basins and a
with construction of both the Wine
portion of Etiwanda Channel as set forth In the Bill Mann report.
31 An-, acquisition of rights-of -way and land, as necessary. Including
other facilities, appurtenances and incidental expenses.
• q) For service to all properties within the district: Participate In tho
financing of Dav Creek spreading grounds and the Day Creek Basin
only If a Federal Interest free loan or grant Is obtained.
The proposed facilities are necessary to meet Increased demands of
ew development
drainage protection placed upon the City as a
occurring within the Day - Etlwanda drainage areas and to conserve water
and assist in the replenishment of the ground water basin.
Based upon the above, it Is my opinion that said facilities are those
that are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the local
Agency as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring within
the boundaries of the district
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
® William C Stookey
Engineer of Work
-3- IV/
0 IV Boundaries of District
A. Description: The boundaries of the district a -e those properties
and par,, .Yhere services are authorized to be provided and In which "
special t..:.es may be levied in order to pay for the costs and expenses
Of said facilities A general description of the area of the boundaries
of the district Is as follows:
- 4th Street (southerly City limits) on the south
- Etiwanda Avenue (easterly City limit) on the east to !6001
south of Foothill Boulevard
- Westerly and parallel with the centerline of Foothill Boule-
vard, !27001
- North !200' to the Devore (Route 15) Freeway
- Northeasterly and adjacent to Route 15 R/W x3000'
- North to !6001 south of Baseline Road
• - Westerly !20001
North ! 2200' to the northerly R/W of the Southern Pacific
Railroad
- Easterly !1400'
- North to Wilson Avenue (northerly City limit)
- West to Hanley Avenue (City limit line)
- South to Highland Avenue (City limit line)
- West to Milliken Avenue
- South to 4th Street
l
Excepting therefrom completed and occupied residential subdivisions
All as more particularly set forth on the boundary map entitled Mello
Roos Community Facilities District No 04 -1 on file •n the Offlce of the
City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (Exhibit A)
-4-
1" q
o —
� tout • r
��°
re
/
�ART YAP
j
MTY FAO
Mmo ROOS O I s bft RiCT W. $4.1
sl
cm of II CVC
EXHIBIT A
COUNn a SAM .TAU CP CALJF 1
,`
/03
B, Boundacation. , The boundaries of this Community
Facilities District consist, with minor modlfico: ons, of that portion he
the Day Creek drainage area lying within the corporate limits of the
City of -Rancho Cucamonga as that boundary Is shown on ferredetoras
co
prepared by Bill Mann and Alisociates and are artamonll- f / shown Exhibit
the BIII Won report. The boundary Is more I
A.
ommunity Facilities District terminate a point t e
The boundaries of the C y of
corporate there limits of th .CitislonsR is the Mellon Roos nAct tPehm°itg its prov time,
ext.nslon across lines of political jurisdiction Also excluded within the
subdlvi-
above drainage area are the completed and occupied residential require -
slons, since these developments have completed their drainage eq
morts as a condition of developing
end will not receive significant addl-
tional benefit from the works proposed
{ e• abllshing these boundaries. he Is recog
n nized that the Day Creek
• he corporate of the
of Ontario drainage area boundary extends be /ond of t which
City of Rancho Cucamonga To the south Iles the City or that
concurrently Is attempting to develop a financing program
the north
portion of Day Creek which Is located within that City.
ortions of the Day
lies the County of San Bernardino where certain p proposed facilities
Creek system must be constructed Inoforder ch or the camong to function
within the boundaries of the City
r.
properly
The entire area drains in a southerly direction with very few topo-
grapnic features separating the drainage systems in an east-west direc-
tion As development occurs, the boundaries of these drainage courses
could be altered by the development grading
It would be proposed that should properties lying outside these bound-
aries ultimately elect to discharge their drainage Into these boundaries,
-5- r ✓U
\".'I
and are p rrmitted to do so, they pay a fee equal to the total of both
ro ertles
tt a princiPal and Interest of the bonding obligations such p
w have supported, had they been orlolnally Incorporated wltliin this
would
• Such funds, If collected, woulo be credited to the Debt
ould
Redemption Fund utilized to finance the Day Creek system.
Facilities District Is divided Into two zones
C Zones: The Community
described as follows:
A - Zone A consists of al, pruperties within the
Zone
al Facilities District that are not specifically
boundaries of the Community ne Faci
ci
described as bein g within bl Zone _ Zone B consists of those properties bounded on
the south by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by Rochester P.venue, on
the north by Baseline Road and on the west by the prolongation of
monga General Plan -
future and existing I'll'"en Avenue (Rancho Cuca
Circulation Clementl
D Zone Discussion
rties within the boundaries of the Community
Zone A - all prope
Facilities District that are not Included within Zone B
engineering study for the
Zone B - Zone B Is curreltly under
purpoa
e of resitlentlal development Located on the buuantlaroy afthis study
district, the method of final dralnege for this areatnataonly a portion of
now being conducted Preliminary Creek system
the area encompassed I n roopertBy draining a Day aining westeriv
with the balance of that property
In developing this Community Facilities District, It is the Intent that
only properties served by the facilities to be constructed are to be
-6-
•
El
subject to the special tax. It is likewise the intant not to develop the
boundary of this dlstric! on other than property lilies that exist upon
the formation. Zone B consists of 3pproxlmately 517 gross acres, of
which It Is currently estimated that 190 gress acreage will drain Into
the Day Creek system For the purpose of precisely setting forth the
special tax for Zone B, the following nothod Is used:
Zone B shall be taxed at the maximum rate of $550 00 per acre for only
190 acres. At such time as the final drainage plar Is establ!shed for
Zone B, only that area draining Into Day --reak shall be subject to the
special taA Snould areus In Zone be in excess of 190 acres drain Into
Day Creek, such excess areas shall be subject to the drainagc fee
herelnbefore stated.
I J
V Cost Estimate
The cost estimate for the works of Improvement for said district Is
generally sot forth as follows:
Said Project Facilities, Including Incidental Expenses
Zones A and B:
Engineering 6 Construction
_Costs
Debris Basin (In S B. County)
Day Creek (In S. B County)
5 2,375,000
Day Creek (in Rancho Cucamonga)
61050,000
5,191,000
Rancho Cucamonga (facilities to be
constructed In Ontario)
3,440,820
Total Engineering and Construction
$17,056,820
Engineering 6 Construction Costs
Capitalized $500,000 RDA Contribution
$17,056,820
(-) 3,225,000
• Incidentals:
$13,381,820
Reserve Fund
Bond Discount
$ 1,000,000
Proceedings
600,000
Contingency
500,000
1,068,180
Total Incidentals
$ 3,168,180
Total to be funded by District
$17,000,000
VI Explanation of Cost Estimate
E
A Payment by City of Rancho Cucamonga: The Day Creek and Etl-
wanda Creek systems are regional flood control systems affecting and
benefitting several Jurisdictions As such, their physical function can
only be accomplished by the construction of facilities in several political
Jurisdictions and cannot effectively be constructed in one area without
-a-
/ v
2
T,,_ Increased run -off result -
also being constructed in ano osed Im-
Ing from the development of this area necessitates the p ro P
provements. agreement
Over the past three years, studies were I ^ItiCcn rol under
District and the
involving thu San Bernardino County Flood
Rancho Cucamonga. and Fontana. The Riverside
cities of Ontario,
the development
County
Flood Control District assisted in coordinating of the drainage
of the hydrology criteria and developed Riverside that portion The drainage
plan for the San Sevaine
Creek
tics Rio Band ewaso cuordlnated with the
plan for the Day
Creek system plan for Day Creek at
Riverside County Flood Control District draina Private developer inte rests
Riverside Drive below the Pomona Freeway a major role development of
also had eeway n the evtechnical and steerlrg
In San Bernardino County the
the drainage plan and participated in both
committees joint respo ^'
group has ..viewed the I after
The technical committee of this B rucamonga and Ontario and,
and discusslol., has concluded that the relative
slblllties of the cities of Rancho In within
considerable study Creek system lying
of the two cities for the Day together with the upstream
the cities of basin in
the cities of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga, downstream retarding would
portI in San Bernardino County, Ontario,
cities
Riverside County and a portion of Etlwande Channel between Othe rlo,
be olstributed equitably from a cost standpoint
in the relationship of 30e p the Clty of Ontario lying within °thecunlncorr
Cucamonga The portico of the wor isl as umed by the City of
Rancho Bernardino County The
Rancho portion of San certain redevelopment obligations
Porated Rancho Cucamonga by reason of fthi known as the Fund-
of the equlty of this distribution, stem
report setting Etiw.nda and San Sevalne Creek System
t
for the Day, orated with rep
ing Mechanisms Bill
Mann and :,ssoclates Is Incorp
Drainage Plan by
by reference
-9- joa
• For the purpose of setting forth the financial responsibll[ties of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for facilities to be constructed by the Com-
munity Facilities District within the City of Ontario, the cost of this
obligation of the City o' Rancho Cucamonga is set forth as a contribu-
tion in the amount of $3,440,640. By contributing this amount to the
proposed Day Creek system aAJ retarding basin southerly of Its corpo-
rate boundaries, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will have contributed
Its fair share to the plan.
A summary of the costs as to this obligation is as follows:
Cost E>timate Facility
Summary
Day - Etiwanda Creek Improvements
Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga
Total System Construction 6 Engineering Costs by both Cities
Debris Basin (in S B County)
f 2,375,000
Day Creek (in S B County)
6,050,000
D,y Creek (In Rancho Cucamonga)
5,191,000
Day Creek (in Ontario)
51009,000
Wineville Basin tin Ontario)
3,030,000
Riverside Basin (in Riverside County)
3,357,000
Etiwanda Channel (in Ontario)
2,950,000
Total
$27,962,000
Share: (per B!II Mann report)
Ontario 398
$10,905,180
Rancho Cucamonga 618
$17,056,820
Facilities to be built by Ontario
Day Creek (In Ontario)
f 5,009,000
Wineville Basin (in Ontario)
3,030,000
Riverside Basin (in Riverside County)
3,357,000
Etlwanda Channel (in Ontario)
2,950,000
Total
$14,346,000
Facilities to be built by Ontario
$14,346,000
Ontario share of costs ( -)
10,905,180
Rancho Cucamonga share of facilities
to be built by Ontario
$ 3,400,820
-10- 5
t�
h
During the past three years, extensive
Bill Mann and Associates on the Day-
B. Cons C been taken from
studies have been conducted by estimates have
Etiwanda system. All construction cost
those reports City of
Tna project area of the
ment Agency encompasses most of the
C Redevelo n�ent Contribution: in the
ti Cucamonga Redevelop Community Facilities District.
Randle ro osed h the fiscal
w,t`;n this p P A envy, the Agency, through
formations meco • 9
Tedevelo? approximately one-third of the
formation of that `y reed to contribute aDP Improve-
total process, 3 Creek drainage
total tax Increment generated toward the Day
ments
to authorize a tax rate which Is consider-
SO this
as not to ask the voters is
be needed In the future, It Is Proposed
000 per
ably higher than may ncy commit a minimum of $500,
ment Age under the
report that the Redevelopment
Thls exceeds Its current obligation committed will
year to this program. ment thus
The $500,000 annual P y costs, thus reducing
Of commitment, and construction one -third
215.000 engineering it in future years,
finance f3, Mello Roos• that amount will be
the amount to be ral'^crement exceeds $500,000,
of the annual tax special fax.
utilized to reduce the
Fund. The cost estimate sets forth a contingency and
D, Continof $1,068,180 Setting a maximum tax
to twenty years, will mean that the
fund In the amount discount, will govern the
also limiting the terms of the bonds and the bond und, which Is a
interest rate, the reserve The contingency
can be raised. allow some
rate. Is established to takes
amount of funds that thus,
the maximum tax for the bonds and,
factor In deriving be selected at the 'Ime the
flexibility In the terms to rketing conditions prevailing
some advantage of the ma
bonds are issued.
-11- 110
,10 E. Water Reclamation Facilities: These proceedings authorize the
Community Facilities District to participate in the cost of certain water
reclamation facilities contingent upon the receipt of a Federal Interest
free loan The _stlmated cost of these water reclamation facilities is as
follows:
Day Creek Spreading Grounds $1,100,000
Day Creek Basin $2 500,000
The application for the Interest free Federal loan Includes these two
facilities together with a substantial portion of the Day ctlwanda drain-
age facilities proposed to be financed by this Community Facilities
District. In the event that loan were to be obtained, the maximum tax
-ate old be significantly reduced since that rate is predicated upon
subs ..,I Interest costs The costs of those water reclamation facll-
Itles, .herefore. have not been factored Into the amounts used to deter-
mine the maximum speclal tax
F Other Fund Sources: In addition to the Redevelopment contri-
butions, there are other possible fund sources that may or may not be
available for this project A portion of the cost of the Improvement
work will be expended In the uninmorrr•rated area. Such unincorpora-
ted areas will not be subjected to t! " special tax. There are, how-
ever, properties within these areas that may be served by the facilities
proposed The City, concurrent with Initiating the Mello Roos district,
will fornally request the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors
to Impose development fees on this unincorporated area with such fees
being contributed to the financing of the facilities proposed
Efforts are In process to finance a portion of the entire project by a
Federal Interest -free loan Should these efforts be successful, the
special tax could be reduced.
Should properties outside the proposed boundaries elect and be permit-
ted to drain into the boundaries, a fee would be levied with such
amounts being contributed to the Day Creek fund.
• V11 Rate and Method of Aoonment ofd
The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth the rate and apportion-
ment of the special tax to allow each property owner within the pro-
posed district to estimate the maximum annual amount that would be
required for pryment.
A R=te of Special Tax: The maximum speclai tax to be levied on all
:
rtles within
the boundaries of this Community Facilities
private prop
District shall be $550 per gross acre per year, except that for prop -
ertles within Zone B, which shall be as follows:
Zone B shall be taxed at the maximum rate of $550.00 Per acre for only
only At such
draining drainage plan
shall I established
be
Zo B, subject to the
Zone B, Y
special tax Should areas In Zone be In excess of 190 acres drain Into
- Day Creek, such excess areas shall be subject to the drainage fee
hereinbefore stated
Gross acreage shall be defined as the area of the property extending to
the centerline of adjoining streets except for corner lots where the area
of the street on the shorter side will be excluded from the calculation.
All easements shall be Included In the area used latiion easements except those
for
easements for the work of Improvement Proposed
power transmission.
B Gross Arca: The maximum special tax is Initially set forth on a
gross area base The reason considerable portion ofnsuch land will be
and, as development occurs,
devoted to public streets If area other than gross area were Initially
used for the "tax base ", the maximum funding available from the Com-
munity Facilities District would continually be reducing. Were bonds to
-13-
If �
• be Issued, a question could develop as to the ability of the district to
continue to meet Its bond service obligations. By Initially utilizing
gross area, that problem Is avoided, When It Is determined that the
maximum tax ern be reduced to net area, the matter will be considered'
by the City Council.
El
C Special Tax Rate Reduction; At such time as the City Council
finds that the maximum special tax so authorized exceeds funds re-
quired to meet the obligations of the Community Facilities District the
City Council shall reduco the maximum tax rate such that It Is calculated
an a net area rather than a gross area basis If and when such re-
duction is made, the net area shall be defined as that area for ttis
parcel appearing on the latest map produced by the San Bernardino
County Assessor or, If such area does not appear thereon, the area
shall be that determined by the City Engineer
_lq_ r r 3
0 VIII Secondary System
The City of Rancho Cucamonga imposes a drainage development fee upon
all properties •jithln the City. This fee Is cu,rently established at
$4.050 per acre and Is collected at the Building Permit level. Within
the boundaries of this proposed Community Facilities District, there
are. In effect, two categories of deficiencies. The Day Creek Improve-
ments, which are the purpose of this district, may be categorized as
the primary oe regional portion of the drainage system, having an
estimated current cost of $17,056,820 for that portion of this regional
system to be financed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Additionally,
there is a secondary draindge system deficiency consisting of those
laterals that will drain Into the Day Creek system. The total amount of
that deficiency Is approximately equal to that of the primary system.
The City's current ordinances pertaining to this drainage fee will not
be altered or modified as a result of this proposed Community Facilities
• District Monies collected by the drainage fee will continue to be used
for the secondary system and that system Is not funded by this
Community Facilities District
IX Apportionment
As further development occurs, apportionment will be required
Apportionment will be done In the manner stated herein for the levy of
the special tax
-15- 1 /L/
•
.
X Total Pam 5?eclal Tax
At such time as all bonds or other borrowing is accomplished,
otliland within will
t be
possible-to set forth a total oblie expressed any
In dollars per acre. it Is
aistrict That obligation can be expressed
the Intent of this program to permit property rwners, If they so wish,
to pay off their entire obligation r.nd, in return, be relieved of the
special tax The precise manner b/ which this is to be done shall be
rdoseeof with
is to its t o forth than it is the request
poicy made
The T pu
he purp the
T
City to permit such a cash payment within the frameworks of the law*
-16-
I I �
' X1 Drainage a ndary Adjustments
it Is conceivable that along the boundary of this district the final
engineering plans may make It desirable to make minor adjustments
within the drainage boundary. !t is not the intent of this district to
preclude such minor adjustments No properties within the boundaries
of this district and paying the special tax Imposed by this bSstrict will
be required to also pay the costs of another primary drainage system
To the extent that the servicing of debt obligations Is not Impaired,
minor exchanges of s funds adjoining primary district and the to adjust
mecha-
nism eventually used adjoining p
areas that may eventually drain to other than the drainage system
which are now proposed
method of apportionment,
It Is my opinion that the special tax rate and
as set forth in this report, are fair and equitable, unifor,aly applied,
and not discriminatory or arbitrary
Respectfully submitted,
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
William C Stookey
Engineer of Work
2
_11_ /i.
Y
GATE OF KEilhG
STAFF
CITY COUNCIL
® CITY CWNCIL
CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL
ORDER OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCR4ONOA
FACILITIES
CRiEC 101114E SYSIEN) R3.1
FEBRUARY 1, 1084
IYasentatlon of eAO geryrAl lY q,oa1M the area end loodartes OF
proposed Car Its "uflftl0 District A 1¢I'Itfn to M
G,wal prefertatlon of ..tent and .Ypef
provided
General prBehtat ROn o< nethod aM gDdrt lan.em >} SpeGtu to
S[Atratmt is to /Oast o} pr001" Rom Iss.t
Adopt RESOLUTION 411tNORt2EN; ESTABLISIK4T OF SPECIA. REVOLVING
FMO• This RefOI�tion Creates a l0octel revolving Tones M of
FUND' lands tar D< AdvAnted to PAY tort'" Cottt " ..pa
the project
Moot RESOLUTION A7DPilhO PROPOSED BWNDUY NAD: Fdnal Ct10n
addotln0 the "o of the vcooud Olstrfct
Moot RESOLUTION OF INTENTtM to ESTABLISH OrN*r'rfiv FACILITIES
OISTRICf mss h Nt rurfsolctia +J Resolution to lo,c a Com-
ewltA� putties OWprlrtM 0Inp ISM a fpicl al t .., and Kt a
tire Adopt RESOLUTION O'CERING •REPOIT• this N lnt form!, Ction
of th! lealfllt ire lad? dl r<Ct InO th' Tedarat'" of A ''!port'
for n Cdrww'It, Fast IIt1U District
Adopt RESOLUTION OF IRTENTIM TO MIR BONDED IeR)MEDNESS:
Th FS Atfa'utlon Sets forth the puroofe 4-1 vaunt Of lM P' >-
,sed Who debt asd the tIM and place for Pohl. narfnd
SCNEDIAE
FfBRUAR+ 1 1981 ApOOtIM 6 AESO:UTIM OF 11TEITIds i0 FFFN CdlNnlTl FACILITIES
OI%TRICT
,W,lON OF RE Y INtENr10N TO :NCM B"4ROCE D WIN ]NESS
>USLIC vEMIN"' AND AZO TV41 IF RESOLUTION; TO PROCEED WIN 0I5T-
NaAC4 ] 19'4 RICT ETC
ADOPTIOr r: RESWUTION SDR4IITIRG LEYT OF SPECIAL TAR 10 MM"
TIED f.ECTIWS.
`�Rr EC�Ii[DNESS
yjOM OF MIES � OAS DY
AND I RG EONO RO OSIMTO WALIiEO If
irk _-
J'r
SECTION 1 My mnies Advanced to sale FUND shall constitute • loan and W
repaid f,"-7, avenues per Pinar le.f.1 venial available Iron tNe District, plus
Interest eg Said Interest shall be the Current nit ar shwa r,lived on sillier
Rinds of in.eltrents by this AaeNCy
SECTION A MI advanrwnt from Sala FUND shall te 10• a period of years
not e.ceedTno RTfS)
S[CTIDN S That lots special R[YOLNIIb rypD 1: Iors.d matr the autherlla-
t10n Of Svh:rr s 57114 and S3114 S Of the Gown eat Coca Of the State of California
PASSED, APPHOTED and ATgat[D this day of leis,
ALES
NOES
ABSENT
WAYUN
ATTEST
E
C4l"•I r j1 2
R[7tUTION NO i H'A
RE SOLUTIO" OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CU YONCA. CALTFM414.
ESTAR.ISHING A 5n[C14L REVIXYM FIpD
FOR THE PLVPOS: OF PAYING FOR CERTAIN
COSTS AX [VERSES RELATM TO A
COnMITT FACILITIES DISTRICT
WMAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the RANCHO CUCAWINGA. CALIFORNIA. Ihertsufter
referred to as the 9101Slative body of tee local AanCIPI, Is r00ele •Ina the fauna.
r
tim of a Corunlly Facilities District N'Suant to the tens And provisions of 1'K
9lello.ions Cor malty Fac Jlllae Act of 19821 Mina Chapter 2 S Part I Division 2.
Title S of the Goverment Code of the Sc.te Of California This Cownnity FCItItIK
District 0111 berelnafter Ir reftned to Ss
COWUNITT FACILITIES DISTRICT 40 PA.?
(OAT CREEK ONAINAO[ SISTER)
thereinafter referred t0 as the '01str1:t11: and.
WEREAS, fictions 51114 and 53314 5 Idecifi:ally authorile the transfer of
fande And leis establlshnnt Of A Rpetlal rev011110 TWO :0 crOrtdt COMAln mnie$ In
advance* said venifS W M used as a loan for the ayovent of certain ar111miroq
Costs and e2OMs11, iKludln0 but vet limited t0 the pay"!nt Of Current expenses,
ac Rulsltim Of pr +o,rty HglneerinR services. And the COnetruttl0n of publlC Capital
facllltles, all retatino to said District. and,
WEREAS at this tine this Ie01sW,,9 boar 1s dtslrauS to estbl•sh a
lorfal fund for aa,ldlh. Cfrtaln mile$ to be utllllm on A wtllnlnary basis, said
ronles to be Mild upon the It,y of any 5.141 tae
NON, THEREFOR[ BE Is OMVEO AS TOLLMS
SECTION I 1Nat the above MITI's ant all true V4 correct
SECTION 2 That the Ieolslatlre body does Hereby establish a special
R[VMVI G r7U- rg�CpnAte4 by in@ mare of this Sestritl said FIND to W used as a
revolvind fund, and any mole$ ]nanto to said FIND lean M Mild upon the levy of
Any spent to
SECTION 1 My mnies Advanced to sale FUND shall constitute • loan and W
repaid f,"-7, avenues per Pinar le.f.1 venial available Iron tNe District, plus
Interest eg Said Interest shall be the Current nit ar shwa r,lived on sillier
Rinds of in.eltrents by this AaeNCy
SECTION A MI advanrwnt from Sala FUND shall te 10• a period of years
not e.ceedTno RTfS)
S[CTIDN S That lots special R[YOLNIIb rypD 1: Iors.d matr the autherlla-
t10n Of Svh:rr s 57114 and S3114 S Of the Gown eat Coca Of the State of California
PASSED, APPHOTED and ATgat[D this day of leis,
ALES
NOES
ABSENT
WAYUN
ATTEST
E
C4l"•I r j1 2
rI
' RESOLUTION NO 5 t% - 3 °
RESOLUTION 6 THE City COnrCIL 6 ME City
OF RAICNO CUCAVOht;.l, CALIFORNIA ADOPTINS
" AOIMOAAI MAP SNOAI% 'POPEATIES AID LUO TO
I� NE SERVED NT CERTAIN ROSLIC CAPITAL FACIti.
!; IES IN A C"1011" FACILIMS DISTRICT
RR IOIERiAS, the CII[ COUNCIL Of the RAMNO CUCAKor4, Cµ1E0RNIA (Nerelr ✓ter
fefentd t0 at the 9Rclslattre Jody Of the to.,) AaencYl. hq received, in Wooer
torn, a vritten 'm'st for the INIt lotion of wMeMIMS to eCreata a C,,,ity
FAC111ties Olstrlct C,rsdant to the I;,S am vovlslons Of tiny e110•ROOt Co+antty
+ Facilltles Act of 19A2- blind Cnaoter 1 a. Part I, D1NSion T. Title S Of the
Dovernnent Code o' the State Of California ThIS Coee,nity facilities nl StrlCt ",ll
herRlMEter Ee referred to H
COINNp ITY rACILITIES DISTRICT V A4.1
(DAY CREEK (RAMU STSTM
thereinafter refened t0 at lM 'Dislrfct'1 aNd,
+ MM.AEAS there Mt been tobvttted A MP ~,0 lM >coertiB Od Cancels
Of IoM Prryosed to be LertlCed by the tedrOrenent] Nlhtn the at"PrefereKed
District
NOW. TIQNEFORE, RE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS
SECTION I that the IDOee recitals are Ill true " correct
serviced )EE��oDof as RVNI1CNcaplull'""It's$ tors the 0011- 1e4ereled D1St,1Ct
Is hereby aooroved and Uooted Said MP It JtRidnaled by lM nre Of Bald Di itrlct in' Of'OfUl Of Office ofsb'E -iEEy Cltrtf end a COPY Oil Itbe d On file1i1, in* Office 0'I the City
Chain"
PASSED. APOICTED and ADOPTED this _ day of , IOU
AYES
NOES
ARSEVt
ATTEST
l�
rNleft"Im- rt 5
RESOLOTIOV No. it L ' 31
RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COIYCIL OF TIE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOMwA, CALTFOFNOA.
OECLARIfG ITS INTENIIOI TO ESTA8LIS9
A COw"ITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 410
TO LEVY A SPECIAL TRY TO RAY FOR
CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN SAID
( COP"M FACILITIES DISTRICT
I wEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the RANCHO CUCARWA. CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter
referred to As the 'IeolsiAtive body Of the local AaenCy'l. has received, In Prosser
faro, a written reoaest for the Initlatian of Prxeedlnas to Create a Co.Hnity
Facilities District MfWht to iM taws aM Se"i SIOM Of the'Rello -ROet Corwelity
Fallitlet Act of 1982. Gina Chute, 2.5. part 1, OIwi SIOn 2. Title 5 of the
Goverreent Code of the State of California, MIS [amenity raellitles District shall
hereinafter be referred to u
CONNTN ITT FACILITICS DISTRICT NO. M.1
(DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
(hereinafter referred to as in! 'District-): and,
WNELEAS, this leolslative Doty Is my required to Proceed to Scoot Its
Resolution of Intention to InRNte Proceedings for the forw,liOM of Said Dlstrl:t,
to set forth lye how darles for said District. Indicate the type of ausslfe facilities
t0 be DeOvidtd, and set a tine and Place for a m,bl1C Garina relatln0 t0 IN mto.
lishvent of Paid District: and,
"(PEAS. A Mo Of slid District has been S aMaltted, mach said Ma It Gre-
Dy ooroved, aM A daoy c' told Mass $Mall be Sent m file with the transcript of
• these o .eedinas.
1011, MIREF0IE, FE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
a- SECTION I. That the abore recitals ere all true AM COrr1t
S(CTICN 2. that the written reOWSt for the Initlitlon of the dronedms
for the or1 oartn of the Corrvnity Faell,tl— as MrMy 1111,10, aooroved, and
ordered to be Real an file with the transe,Int of these aroCeedleaf for this
District
SECTION 7 It Is the Intention of this laalslatlre body to fan a Casty-
nily. FACAITETI—S-MI ricl, the GunOales Anti Parcels Giro that are, Of land In which
Public 1,CII101S ere to G arovlded aM m which snecial tales My G TeYled In
order l0 cay the cost Nat aoente$ fcr Said owallt fcllltle$ A desc110tlon of the
boundaries of territory mopot,d to be Included In the olstrlct Is as falls"
Certain ProoartICS lying within the (011041no described boundaries
SOu"trly by FOURTH STREET
VestarTY by wILLIKEN AVEWIC
Rartherly by the Northerly Clta Melts of the City of Rancho CW mwa
(M104AaO AVENUE AM WILSON AYEAICI
(aslerly generally by ET10404 AVCLUE
TO' patitulars, reference IS Not to the No a% Pbfously v,,"td and W
/111 In the 011lde OF the tlty C'era aM A rare Metalled Mefcrlotic, will
aHO G found 11 the orallnfnary Galneer's 'Rory for said Coewalty
Facilities District
SECTION 4 The hue at the or000ttd Co,whity'Militias District to G
Tarred tM1TT'5j' own aM Mslanate0 as CommlTT FACILITIES OISTRICt V. pA.l (04,
CREEK CAINAGE SYSTEM)
91
12. 0
Alt It 1[ Ue intention of this ` r .tr' lh^
SECst'
COnfin E 104111101 lt 1 nI or
111tat 10n r• er't♦ •NI Or 0' ^!'i tI-.M-
"tjn cd
is •rrt^^
oromrtt
usef.1 life a of . ne••
DraDerty •Ito nil +nn uiefol IIIe or /ht rt ) '
4Q 4 GrflI
to nett hired Boon lens Ape -:/ n -
Senn a
ncu
1 I
•Itmn 1Is 12011[: !er «U b• 10n d 1 e
or io, rind .1
rent or rennllxatl0^ Y.Lto
Public uDitJ1 4nllf tfn to b ynrl YE ++ au follo•rs
SO
r
I Pt114AaY UTAIMGC •1 LITI[S to "I'VE ;'S t •>• J•n`e•
aryl,
( DEBti$ A.LSIe; 1t CwstfWtIO^ It flood La• it Ilan She Nt
y,'
re- IJSiEion n+i[n IhQS1Ie! ;t •'• u\1- ar;orrtr' v'1 Y -rtn t
PeF'7
the City.
I
Y
wf 1`1111 •\Ili+^ rr :e I itur"Irmnt etSoh "o fr
[ip 'Wr rs tat In to 7° . `I w •'r of the city of tinone
S`
CKA, •1, (FOAN Srttt
dN•-I• gr+stl,"
r•nr 1 • y f _r y et a. 0 tIe IOI10.1I
on t
(flWAVA C, -this
't
W'41EVILL! 4 Y flood Co 101 • ..... I" rat. Ilttr "e"
1 "Jro.h�
�+
DItl1Sh Vnd f1000 F 1'I f,wt a -_ —. I 11N^h.
t
ryrc•+ i-
r�
oo0.. rq,<' ^'\n(t A,V 1411Y' aY !
I• U! C +` r of M+'ln0 DODtf-
•
n 1fQ Op rele+t •t Y +t.\In IY It)
'F•
I t CA /LlY 6515' 0 n[R'IRt
!
• C0 ^I!1 Oe t• ertain DA, 'PEEr forlso •0 T8.%fs a'd V. DAY
4
Ct2CJ MS I+ %^I rmft the Load It la. 1. 11 in Federal inierelt-
t! '!M5 a^t I' •I. 1-10110 t on of - 1^jl[t -OT -NY
t
rr^I .., 1 I^['u01 n0 oanr la.11lt Mo., 1 es—n VI
JII !:Ipe AI e. -stf
P 11A. tin Da.e- EettrlLrd, r• 'ItIlitln ..;Ich this
It w[AY1te' !1 IS. nor MI.'S ..n D• Ste It Is "re y
`I
•
L.rt+r ' .': I+d then••" utl " •e•':[d rc\ IHn ..r •r.ess"r to Yen
ver +.� b•a••'L olwed a tnla bC•) at 1 rnuit ! Otlelow" rr
rP'.• uI J •
•
1'Y • "hat 's M -.!• lu•t ^t rdDOled ILAt trti3• Mil r! r/• ` ✓1
r�`rjl
Ial+'1r41t1 rr a tD = "• N, • rll ent to M, for HIC IS Ift -1. nil he
ned r•.f 11. .11 ^11 Inc -I 'r. • turd 0". 'I1 1- fr 1: llr• H to I"
1
utf fed NI 101 47.1101I±nt • I.. "d : -Jaar tV, •!'f,: :n It -Act b
•r•I•n
B
trip lltsht! -1 tr:a• -•A:•d F.hlart si'f form In f.rFP dnall let
••t MC al F r t1,vf "' t0 11 • !. +y 'In^ Vir -r rttl`•nl +IIh w I.J I y1e0
I
D14'r:l t0 C rlrl, rttl -l•• Ire 1'n ,I 1ryYn: Ir 51`! tt•5,4 .III rI\f 1J Ld• for
Isaid fecllitltt
B
1 SEC BO I q' It IS G,vfl • -i1 .• ME 'N rir tl1 ,+u Car <N v •+( WE,1
•r "� -rWrT? P+ 'r+E aEGlIt AR •[Erin. RACE J AC tlGi" IE A' '• NG THE
48E•IS. Cif, .¢t A 1UeUC •WIW. o -• [E !!n . ._r in ll GISLAT ISC
p'
—I YELL =,SIDE' t,C ESTABLISK -ENT C! Nip nrvy`- r.•Al'1.1n r";L; 'IS DfIvRICT
N ^PDS[r A!4.1) loi1 VPDefIDS V 6 TIC IeIC..L fat, '• 41 Df•d M' Yes 6
,,P�
SEt F'4111 11 AIS R'C.StICV Of IVTEITIDY IPIT d' 1E c -,.r KY•I ^49 r; Mo
A
s
TINE TWO PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARIK: MS PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING TAXPAYERS- PRO.
PETITE OWNERS AM REGISTERED VOTERS, NAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD, AND THAT ME IESTIMOAV
OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST ME ESTABLISHJQRT OF THE DSTAICT. ME
EXTENT OF ME DISTRICT, In ME FUvn ISHING OF ME FACILITIES. WILL BE HEARD AND Ont•
SIOEREO. MY PROTESTS NAY St MADE ORALLY OR IN WAITING. HOWEVER, Me PPITESTS
PERTAINIM5 TO ME QIGV.ARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF ME PROCEEDINGS SMALL BE IN WRITING
AND CLEARLY SET FORM ME IRREGULARITIES MO DEFECTS TO WHICH ME OBJECTION IS MME.
ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH ME CLERK OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY ON OR
BEFORE ME TIME FIXED FOR ME PUBLIC NEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE V11102MN IN
WRITING AT ANY TINE BEFORE ME CONCLUS104 OF ME PUBLIC HEARING
SECTION A. That notice of the tin aM place of the public nearlra Shall
be Riven byte CiCy Clerk in the foilo•tna nnner•
1 A Notice Of Public Hearing Shall to Dubltshed in the
legally Designated eRusoacer of general circulation, being the DAILY REPORT, said
Rutll:atice mmuint to Section 6041 a the WverNNYnt Code. with sold Publication to
be cen letee at least seven (7) &:1 Prior to the date set for Pe P011c Marina
2 A Notice of Public Nearing Shall be ailed, postage me-
paid td earn Properly cheer NW registered Voter Nthln the boundaries of the s 0•
Posed District: Said mllino to the property c•rtrs sill be to the Address as OR.
on the list mullised assess•ent 1011 Said millnq Shall be cbePleted at least
fifteen (IS) days Prior to the date set for the . Alic hearing
SECTION g All envlron•ental evaluation Procredlnas rtlatln to the fan,-
^.n and r.,UTq-6f this District Pall be c"letrJ Prior to the Ate AM tin Set
I the Public hear Gw
ATTEST
vossEn AFPAOVED and AOMPTEO -Nis ely of , IRMA
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
17--
w`
W
jz3
["Oftoa
Cllr K RANCHn CICAPONGA
CO"041E FACILITIES nISTRTCf NIL M.1
-Av CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
FF
1'
CIMi41 •A•
{
r The C~Ity facilities Dlstr'c. has peen divided Into AO fonm:
.i
ZONE •,e. (mineral peas t0 ee served by the bNMOe flttlitlet Hcluslre Of ZOM
I
Il
•e•
Z04E •6• A c on
elled area. belno ly urtiply solved by &alnaoe facftltles Zoe
1
7.
•e• consists of those erd0ertles bounded do the South by FOOTHILL SOOLE.
10D. on the East by ROCHESTER ANENU on the Nerth by BASE UM ROAD• and
oA the Rest by the ovol"Catio, of MILLJK(l AVENUE
J.
r
v.
Z
The rate. •Othol aM forxula for tM levy Of the sotolal tea for the reIpdctive
'
IMA$ Wind Zone •A• iM Zone •e• IS as follows based M =A a pond Munt Act t0
estate eZOMS.001. eA)aDle qtr A oerl0d Of years Mt to exceed twenty (ZOI yep$
ZONE •A• nor TD EXCEED SSA.00 PER ACRE
+
EONE •e• NOT TO EXCEED SSSO 00 PER ACRE FOR IV ACRES. At mph tiol as the first
dralMOe elan IS established for Zone •B•, only those Orooertln that
?
drain Into the hAV CREEK CHANNEL shall be fuble•.t to the $xNal drama➢*
ee. Ivns of Zone •B• IN MISS of I" acres llat m train into tH Oa1
CREEK CHANNEL shall be .bjtTt to I d"Indle fee
W
jz3
["Oftoa
1
RESOLUTION 40. F " - 3 1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COWIL Or THE
CITY Or RANCHO CUCA•101GA, CALIFCAVIA.
OADERING AM DIRECTING THE PREPARATION
OF A FINAL -REPORT' FOR A COYRAITY
IWACILITTES DISTRICT
WEAEAS, led CITY COUNCIL of the CITY GF WORD CICAKWA, CALIFOARIA,
r (hereinafter "it," to as the •Ienlslatlre body of the local Aeenq'), has declared
I its Intentton to Initial* croceedpp +
1 to create a Conn:ty Facilities District
Pursuant to the terss and Previsions of the Wello -Roos Co+.unity, Facilities Act of
1902•, beino Chaoter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Goverment Code of the
State of California This C~Ity Facilities Olslrict shall hereinafter be
referred to as
CONnollit FICILITITS DISMICT 40. 44.1
(DAY di EER ORAIMLE CYSTEN:
(hereinafter nfvred to as the 'District'): and.
WCREAS, there has roe been submitted by Ono owlntM EnolMer of Wrk a
&rWolnary 'Redorl' relatla to the weceed Phis for the above•refereNced District:
am.
WIPERS• this lealflative bcJy Is n deslard to direct the Prwantlon of
a
final - Pedort- to Xmlde sore dstalird Infereatfcn relatino to tie Pr000.cc
District. the orewted Pre2Kt facilities and estiRacc of cost
NOW, 'NEHEPORE. Of IT ILSOLVID A' FOLLGfc
SECTION 1 not the above recital, are 0 t,,, am colre4t
I ICTIOR 2 TM1 11111144 ASSOCIA'ES tV a,"total 14GIIIII OF 1a1RC Is
F'eby dlrec�F� Ordered to Peoare a final 'Aw•rt' K Da Present hl to this
leOlslatfve body, said final 'Revert' to contatn further infineal'on and data rma,d.
IM a Oesc,lOtlo, of the Pro2Kt facllPles re0u1red to ever led 4f44 of the Dist.
its Furth' "to and In GIA10n rwarOlnO in* nllNta of the toot 10' Wovidim
said facilities, and an, further dots relitino td Pa ate or reLhdN a/ tlwrttoreent
of Va toK10 tas reoulred to finance said crabct gCllltil Sold Final 'cwo.t'
shall further contain any ether ftterial that Is -clarw to the KcoosK ProIK•
facilities Pr District
SECTION S, Said final 'loot' uocn Its weoarr•l01• shall K SNO11tled
to his lear%17. ve body for veviv.. am said Anal - Rabort 11,11 be We a dart of
the FKOn of the wbllc Marino on 'Fe beto TUtlOn or lntentl0n to No ttlllsft $aid
District
PASSED, WROeED an' W-1E0 this _ day If , la4
A1ES
4CES
ASSENT
ATTEST
{T_=L .
el
•
RESCILUTION NO ;Fa 33
RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY i RANCHO CUCARONGA.
CALIFORNIA. OICLARTIG INTENTION TO
ISSUE YINDG SECURED By SPECIAL TRIES
TO PAT FOR CERTAIN FACT, HIES IN 4
COMMUNITY FOCILITIrS DISTRICT
MIEREAS, the CITY CDl2II or Ice City OF PIANO &LCWONGA. CALIF(0414.
I'I Merelnafter referred to as lA1'itolelQht ,,y Or Pe 10CII Aau.:Y 1. has •4Clarre
P m
.IS Inteltlon to Ord:r Q fa tjoh of A C* jty Facilities Olst,icl for Carta,,
ProlAct facilities pu•suanl to tee te—s and Provisions of the 'Ne 110-Root Cvvvllt,
F"llltln Act Of 1982% beln* [Mater 7 5 Part I, D10s,on t, title c of the
Gorerrrmemt Fade of the State of Callfornia. corr,htim with Stctlon 57111 This
Coarynity Facilities s strlct Rail herrinafter be referred to IS
COIMLNIIY FACILITIES DISTRICT 1O p 1
(GAY WEER DrA:W.E SYIIENI
(M -Ani t!r referr<d to as the 'District -) am.
WMAS. It Is the intentlin of Inks lenslative body to firl"q All or A
Portion of laid f&elll In throudh tie +sfuan[e of boat, Slid Pods to be secured by
ASLetlal V"'S, all IS duth*1111d Durswant to laid melt*.Root C *~Ity Facilities
Act or TBPB'
NOW, TPFREPRE IT 15 HEREBY RCSOLVEO AS fOLLM
SECTION I 'hat the Bore 'Mites, are al• true and correct
I
SECTION t mat this 1POSSIAtive body 0.[,rn that the C,IIC ;omeMIMV
anL .e:ev7ij rlrn tnae A Inrd•d hamteen.tf be Innrred to HnAnce all 0r A
perticn of certaln p.btic protect ,."Titles M PoPCted for the do jL ,t#d Dl Ftrlct
SECTION D. Ivat tee "IM.a 'Or Pie bdooseo H end f"lllt as Irmlto
to be /Invc�l'Touoe the I[SPa,ce Of V rd PONS It aenelIlly deS.rtEao as follows:
To flnan[e the C,rStrl4tlo, Aid I,ftall<tlon of Me,, pW llc
Capital batntee id facilities, topfther hIt- V'oWlfnanl <t A 4pwtMert work, Cla
Pit :nctdentai ea tenses to serve ant provide bAinaaw Protection t0 PC *Artln
with In Uhf Wl iarles of the Proposed Co Ursty FZ titles DISlr Its
SECTION t, tr,t the ".Ft of the WOOClad MnCed Mebtednns, IMI.d'M
tee cot: o7- E>- +iT[III[ +ea udat Nsr dtn .II ONldortAl rrptnse[, is a ... all, as
follows.
SAID PAWEDr FACILITIES PCLUDIY 1'C10147AL EXPENSES SNLL qt fICIED
S.M,zi.000.00
SECTION '—NOTICE IS GIVEN TM' ON t.E TIN ^ay IF MICN. 19M. At THE HOUR
rT
OF F•TO O'C[ftF,. IN ME REGULAR'Cft-NG 1ACC OF THE LIGESLATI,E %Dr. BEING TIE
I
CO"N"
dVIERS, City wIL, A PUBLIC WMIN. Hta BE HELD pA ME INTENTION OF M:S
L LEGISLATIYE MOY TO INCUR A BONDED INOCS -ENYSS TO FIANCE PUBLIC FACILITIES IN ME
FIIIEEDINFOP SAID MIBLIC DISTRICT
HEARIM. BPAY PER5' '. 11IMSTED. IICL'1Dl% PERSONS M.J; O Mo.
PEAry NITHIN ME AREA, way APPEAR Ah0 MENENr My NATlER3 AILLT116 TO THE AOPOSCD
IrtER)IOV AND AECESSITY FOR INCLRRIK T1? ME BONDED :NCEBTEOWSS TO PAT FOR ALL GO R
PORT;Ds U, ME NMGPOW, K911C FACILITIES 10 R SECURED BY A SPECIAL IAA TO BE LEVIED
WIMPI SAID CCHMUNIIY FAWLITICS DISTRICT
I.,I-
0
L,
1E
Sl2-r 6 1, t notice o1 the ... arc Dia;e of the Public nearl, shell
Dt Of ren pl1TI14 9e In tnt tice of Wanner
Ie¢al. 1 A Nestle, Of Psblll Mearino $hall D! Wished to the
f 4ffh'"us ne.f¢ader OI o<nval clr; ylal'an, be fiq THE dIL✓ REPORT. sH0
be clC"101 wrfuant to Section ddi of the Ewv.rn t CoOe..Itn Sala Dyp sic et son to
De coop lettl at seat seven (7) Calf Dr Nr to Ile Oat. set for the ",I, Neosho.
tD each c A Not lee Of pyplll veer one shalt pe fttlr0, oof oaot Ae¢tlO,
pr¢Dertl Daher arN rH lfter<0 toter .Ithih the Doundultf Of tn< VDDD$ed
list loot feed ...ts& to the DroDVOl owners that; pe tD ;he tlaeif ss moan an the
lift eOYal ilH aff,filnt ro'l Said .all,DO shall h c
(151 dalf Prior t0 the data let /Or the Du01fc hear,.¢ xDl,lM at least fifteen
ATTEST
PASSED, APPADiED and ADOPTED thlf
G) or 9a
AYES
ROES
ABSENT
L cede and entered into this � day of ESailcipal
a. THIS AGR1�S'-1 CUC ' C%-FmU'
1983, by and 'jeVem the CITY OF RAT00 „City' and RC IA\M OQ'TXV - a
torpor hereinafter referred W �'cer referred to as 'Tleveloper ".
r atim.
d ship, here
California 9ee�al partnership,
provides as follows:
—E.Crm—s is required
'i er desired to eoaplete the irov�
H. �, Develop g real property in the City sb`x`n an
for the subdivision of certain 119341
11 approved Tentative Tract of Tentative Tract
condition Y
tins naval
.IorAs, one of u'a w iflood Pr t¢ction facilities be providedi
11934 is that add Federal Bv,.rSency Manage-
,. Map NO and the the Corps of Engineers Protection requires the
(� Cam' adequate
flood . rtent Agency has detercdned that said adeq de protection
ttuction of a training levee to PT°vi
east levee of the Day Creek Spteaiin8 Grrnrnds
acquIsicion and cons
.` outbreak of the Zone
^� froa a possible the Flood plain
w reaove Tentative Tract id. 11934 from
and �� rl�e tralnisl4 levee is re4tiir� north of HiBhiand Avenue,
r,
the safety and protection
but is necessary for
in the incorporated area
Cucmrmga main-
to acquire the zighi ht-of-way for the
•, of area within the City of Poncho
wv *, City is ""ling ��it ',X- and ••8•. • at the Presen=
I've
a across the property described in said right-of -vayl
time only if Developer agrees to pay all costs of acquiring
City and Developer agree as follows:
04 Tt-�E•
e. by appropriate
(1) Developer shall use its best efforts to
,te of the crain� levee
construction and IDaL'1Leilar
a�i1ns, an ease^+ent for Exhibit "A." imd'B" atta ched hereto.
® across the property described in
..7
(2) If Developer is unable to acquire easement after using its
best efforts, City shall use its lxst efforts to acquire by apprOPriate
proceedings, including eminent domain proceedings if necessary, said
easement
(3) Developer may utilize said easwimr, when aged for the
construction of a training levee. in order to satisfy the flood protection
conditions of Tentative Tract $0. 11934. The location. d -s -gn and consuve-
ticn of said training levee wit`s said easawnr shall arufor—* to all City
and appropriate goveiamrsntal azencies' requirements therefor.
(4) All costs of acquiring the aforesaid easement shall be ooa.e
by tha Developer Said costs shall include, b. -- s.vall not be li=:ited to.
just cat.,rnsation for the prupercy acquired including severance damages,
if any, litigacixn expenses and da7ages upon A(snl Ssal or defeat of right
to take. appraisals, acquisition agent expenses. legal fees. and court costs
Awry settLamenc which exceeds 115% of the alarais
ed value shall be approved
by the Developer
(5) Immediately upon the execution of this Agreement. Developer
shall cake a payment on account to the City in the non of $3,000.00. This
sum, and any other deposit with the City, may be used for any Purpose con -
terplated by this Agreement. '
(6) Prior to the filing of a complaint in eminent dmain for the
propose of
acquiring the easement 'herein described, Developer shall deposit
with the City the Probable amowt of ca pwsation, based on an appraisal, that
will be awarded in the Proceeding, together with am additional sum equal to
151 of the probable amount of coapentatim. Said amount, aid additions thereto
while in the control of the City, will be kept in an interest bearing account
(7) In the e-ent additional ronies are necessary in order to conple-_
AIM
( the acquisition contctplated by this Agromlent, Developer shall deposit the
`F -are with the Cicy within fifteen (15) days after derad is made therefor.
-2-
.IY
(7) (cart. )
Vitlnut in any way limiting the foregoing. wi -hi_n fifteen (15) dn7s
alter entr of Judaaatt, or other oreer, in any aaaine t danain proceed!%g,
Devclrrper shall d3posit with the City an w%A_nt of moral sufficient to
enable the : icy to cake said payment
(B) Stbsegncmt to the cmclusicn of all proceedfn93 contemplated
by this Ag:-eument. City ahcll return any unused portion of Developer's
deposits inclining interact thereon to Developer
x9) thl.4 Agrexmmt shall. be binding and shall irme to the bmafit
of auccesscrs and assigrm of the parties hereto.
(10) IL= is of the essence of this P.greeaenr..
(11) This AgMmeat nay be codified T at*rded only by an instru-
ment in writing executed by both parties
(12) In the event either party is required to caase+ce legal action
to sexxre performance by the other party of any of the provisions of this
Agreaaent, the prevailing Farty in such litigation shall be encitled to
recover court costs and reasonable atrornsys fees
IN UTIMM 1"TEEDF, the partie3 have executed this Agreement an
the day and year first above written.
PZ L411) C("ANY
a Califo'rnia General partnership
BY: IV? MULL LYCH CaMNY
a9 -neral Farrneri
Dior a res me
211983 a es c
utt GEC— I Un' OF RAMV C(F.MMA
Mayor
-3-
/� 9
. � L....
G� L �� R Y �,
��` ,� �
'•
flC'1 Kivu �' /L' pSC,VI/t�i o�`�.
%ye 7�
j
�' �tti CGnc�it ti ux P.U. Qo,Y g— Ccnc a t�
48 % 32
9_�t � L663
-
64"74 T-F4 EV- 17
q 9 Q- 14 -7'i
'�'6 �dcQn. �'� rbonG
/
log s:Z .Zoq �i✓1- erd�
48�' • 7'/3Q
�/lru� lU� /sof•
lv X19 L'.g�Er, J��,�
��y-`J��
4- �3
1n7uv
gyp.. l2,
l..T. A4
r� �.wla.%&xa -,o
- pftytD �La CK�'�
Co17d a'•ndan OArt 93- 7`4070
Gll� 4Ada;�- Qom- g$o -.2541
987- "Al
�I�o cRKi C-r-
F.4), 8Cx 7?f /9PG
GG� Z /e 18'y
w MIKES a
F PMACAMIEEIRO"MIHC.
10 wx 0
I1f �M,xf 14Kx RA1n w1e,
RANCHO 6ANTAFE,CALIrORMA 92067
,q •xpuE „ei 1, y,,,,,
ir�m� oniii few.
January 23, 1983
Lloyd 8 Hubbs, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 82.2
(ALTA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT)
Dear Lloyd
Enclosed herein please find updated PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOIN APPLICATION
FORM, gelierally fe11ow1n.1 the Guidelines that we discussed at the meezinG last week.
Please ?.gain review, and l will be happy to finalize the form upon receiving comments
EE proposed amendments
yours,
BROWN
FIIO:bd
encl.
cc: Robert Daugherty, Esq , City Attorney
Don Owen & Associates
PREL1MI NARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LOAN APPLICATION FORM
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, is conducting
proceedings for the formation of a special assessment district for certain drainage
improvements, pursuan. to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act
of 1913 ", beinq Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
california, said special assessment district being known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 82 -2
(ALTA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT)
(hereinafter referred to as the -Assessment District ") :, and,
WHEREAS, inasmuch as the primary benefit for the Assessment District is the right to
develop undeveloped land, the City Council is desirous to make funds available as a
loan to certain property owners whose parcels qualify either as partially developed
or non - conforming, all as shorn in the Engineer's "Report" for the above- referenced
Assessment District: and,
WHEREAS, said loan will be made available to those parcels who submit the appropriate
loan application and who qualify, and upon said loan being made available, the
property owners will agree that said parcel of property will not be converted to any
other use for a period of ten (10) years from the date of said loan
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the undersigned property owners and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
I That loan applications will be made available for all persons who sign on this
preliminary Assessment District Loan Application form
2 Tha- if the undersigned property owners qualify, inasmuch as their property is
within the class of partially developed or non - conforming, that loan funds will
be made available to assist in the payment of their assessment
3. Both parties mutually aqree that said properties shall not be converted to any
other use or further developed for a period of ten (101 years from the date of
said loan
4. Said loan shall bear interest from its date at the rate of ten Percent (100, and
shall be all due and payable upon the expiration of said tun (10) year term, or
may be deferred until the issuance of any permit for further development Open
the expiration of said term, said loan shall continue to bear interest.
5 Any assessments for the 11th year and /or subsequent years will be collected on
the tax rolls if not discharged at that time
6. The undersiqned property owners hereby further waive any right to protest or
object to the formation of the above- referenced Assessment District, but does
reserve the right to protest or object as to the method and formula for the
spread of -ssessments
T The undersigned property owners further acknowledges that any Prepayment of any
assessment will not waive or accelerate the ten (10) year term, as set forth in
this Agreement
' b
i
A
B. It is mutually understood that an Agreement -ill be executed by the property
owners, secured by a deed of trust, to cover ail loan advances as made pursuant
to this Preliminary loan Application
9 The undersigned property owners are desirous of receiving loan contribution
funds to assist in the payment of their assessment
10 lhis Agreement may be terminated at an earlier date by the property owner giving
`ive (5) years written notice to the Public Works 0lrrctor of the city, and pro -
aerty owner shall, upon the expiration of said five (5) year term, pay interest
for the remaining balance of the clan agreement
SIGNATURE OF
DATE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNER
November 16, 1983
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Couucil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wednesday, November
16, 1983. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 Pon, by Mayor Jon D. Mlkels.
Present were Councilmnmberot Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. auquot II, Phillip D.
Schlosser, and Mayor Jon D. Mikelo,
Also presentt City Manager, Lauren it. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lem; City Planner, Rick Comex;
City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Finance Director, Barry Empey; and Community
Services Director, BL11 Holley,
Absents Councilman James C. Frost whu had take.1 is wife to the hospital.
Approval of •Unutes: None wdro submitted for approval.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Thursday, November 17, 1983, 7:00 p.m. - PARR ADVISORY COMMITTER MEETING,
(tons Park Community Center.
S. Because of the holiday, the Planning Commission will not have a quorum at
their next neeting; therefore, the meeting will be cancelled.
C, Thursday, December 1st, 1983, 7:30 p,m, - ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING,
Lions Park Community Center.
D. Mayor Hikels announced that Prvurly Authelet, Deputy City Clerk, has earned
her C1C and and is now a certified municipal clerk.
F. Mayor Pro Tem, Mr. Buquet, made a presentation of a proclamation to Llovd
Hobbs, CSLy Engineer, for his time on Measure W.
F. Mr, Wasserman requested Consent Calendar, ices, "t ", be removed,
C. Mr, Dahl requested Consent Calendar, item "o ", be removed for discussion.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83 -11 -16 and Payroll ending 10 -30-83 in
the total amount of $524,621.58.
B. Approval of Assessment District 82 -1 and Assessment District 82 -2 Warrants
for October for $253,473.16 and $6,210.00.
i�
,X -
g. .CSry Council Minuses
•» November 16, 1983
Page 2
C. Forward Claim No, CL 83 -47 against the City by S. Kennedy to the City
Attorrey and Insurance Carrier for handling.
D. Forward Claim No. CL 83 -48 against the City by Ray Royster and Ray Royster,
Jr. to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handing.
E. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 83.21 for On -3ale Bear 6 Wine Eating
Place License, Mlmi's Deli, Marlon and William Kellas, 9799 Base Line goad,
Suite 1.
F. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 83 -22 for On -Sale Beer L Wine Eating
Place License for the Sassy Steer, Cheryl and Edward Dobrtynski, 903U Vineyard
Avenue,
Approval to accept Bonds and Agreement for a portion of Tract 9351
submitted by Lewis Development CO., located on the west aide of Sapphire
between 19th and Banyan.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -187
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A PORTION OF TRACT 9351
H. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Security for 9833 Highland Avenue
submitted by Joe and Marla Dias.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -188
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 9833 HIGHLAND AVENUE
I. Approval of a Cnopotative Agreement No. AG 83 -68 with the Department of
Transportation (CalTrans) for the design and construction of a traffic signal
at 19th Street and Archibald Avenue. This project is on the City's 1983 -84
Capital Improvement Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -189
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMTNGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH IHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
J. Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement and Improvement Security for
Tracts 11663 and 12019 - Marlborough Development Corporation - located on the
east side of Archibald, south of Church.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -190
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 11663 AND
17019
K. Approval of Intent to Vacate the Eust /West Alley located between 8th Street
and Acacia Street, Past of Cottage Avenue,
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -191
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCTL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THE
EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN 8TH STREET, EAST OF COTTAGE
AVENUE
L. Approval of Agreement No. AG 83 -69 for design services for a traffic c "goal
at Carnelian Street and Lemon Avenue. This project appuars on the City's
1983 -84 budget for capital improvements.
q, ,
City Council Minutes
November 16, 1983
Page 3
M. Approval o' Final Tract Mal No. 12305, a two lot condominium development on
the north site of 19th Gttent and the east aide of Hellman Avenue, and
accepts•ce of bends and agreement for construe -ton of a portion of 19th Street
and Hallman Avetue submitted by Charles Roy Construction, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -192
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12305
N. Approval to solLClt bide for City -wide Concrete Repair Annual Maintenance
Contract.
0. Approval of Map Amendment for Fival Tract Nap No. 11350 submitted by Lowy
Dovelopment Corporation (formerly Lesay) located at the northwest corner of
Hermosa Avenue end Base Line Road.
RESOLUTION 10. 83 -193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA9CH0
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING HAP OF FINAL HAP
OF TRACT NO. II350
P. Approval of release o: a portion of Letter of Credit for 4th Street Storm
Drain. - located on the nort,: aide of 4th Street 2300' west of Etiu eda Avenue.
The bank will continua to holo 4176,000 for six mon -ha as guarantee of labor
and matellals. Developer) Etiwa��.a Investment Company (Pic -N -Save)
Release of Latter of Credit $352,000.00
Q. Approval to accept a Real Properly Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
for CUP 81 -03 for construcrtor of , median island on Foothill Boulevard and
Archibald Avenue (Miller's Cvtpostl
RESOLUTION NO. 83.194
A RESOLUTION OF ru, CITY COJNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNI ,CCEPTINC A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
CONTRACT AND LIEN AG.,E.AENT FROM DAVID AND DENYSE HILLER FOR
CUP 81-03 AND AUTHORI2TNG THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN
THE SAME
R. Approval to bngln employee development and training program jith Rose -Lewls
4 Associates. Ctct of the program is 97,000; amount is budgeted.
S. Set public hearing of December 7, 1983: Appeal of Planning Commission
decision denying General Plan Amendment 83 -04B and Zone Change 83 -04B -
Sycamore Investments A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from
Office to Neighborhood Commercial and a zone change from A -P (Administrative
Professional) to t:-1 (Nnighborhood Commercial) on 5.44 acres of land located at
the northeast corner of Archibald and Base lino - APN 202 - 181 -27.
T Set public hearitki of December 7. 1983. Amendment to Final Hap 11350 -
Lowy. The applicant it requesting approval for architectural, site plan and
amendments to the lo, lines for the previously approved Tract 11350, 114
tovnhomas located on 1C acres of land on the northwest corner of Base Line and
Hermosa - APN 202 - 182 -13. (Item rencved; it was a duplication.)
U. Set public hearing of December 7. 19831 Environmental As- eesment and
Planned Development 83 -34 (Tentative Tract 12366) - TAC. A change of zone from
A -1 (Limited Agricul-ure) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family R- sidentlnl /Planned
Development) and th.- development of S4 tovnhomns on 4.3 acres of land generally
located vast rr Vineyard, north of Arrow - APN 207- 211 -16
V. Sot public hearing of December 7, 1983: Proposed Develo;raent Agreement -
PD 83 -01 Calmark. Approval of the developer agreement for the Heritage Park
senior citizen apartment units located northwest of Bale Line Road and
Archibald Avunue, south of the Southern Pacific railroad tracks.
it "� % "" City Ca,utail Minutes
November 16, 1983
Page 4
N. Approval of Resolution to set public hearing of December 21, 1983: for the
intent to change street names of Pepper Court to Culpepper Cnurt and Pepper
Street to Culpepper Street.
RESOLUTION N0. 83 -195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO CHANGE THE NAME
OF PEPPER COURT TO CULPEPPER COURT AND PEPPER STREET TO
CULPEPPER STREET
MOTIONt Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to approve the balance of the
Consent Calendar with items "0" and "T' removed. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Frost
absent).
Discussion of Item Ot Mr. Dahl asked what the end product would be used for;
woun It be rent-1 or condominium.
Mr. Gomez stated that it was a townhouse where units will be for sale.
Mr. Dahl stated he had no problem with this then.
MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve Consent Calendar Item 0.
Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Frost absent).
Mr. Buquet stated that in future we Lhould make a policy that a company would
not be allowed to open until all the acceanss are completed . There were many
problems with the Miller's Center by opening early.
Mr. 4asserman atsted ti-at another problem was chat the open trenches veto
creatlne a problem for the children going to and from Central School.
Therefore, a temporary crossing guard had to be hired to help the children
around these.
Hr. Dahl asked if there would be a left hand turn in the median island.
Mr. Lam responded the median island has not yet been designed.
4_ ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
4A. NEW DEVELOPMENT CODE AND DISTRIC' NAP. Review and consideration of Cho
proposed Development Coe an an Maps to replace the current Interim Zoning
Ordinance. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner.
Mr, Gomez stated the there was still one issue left over frog the last meeting,
whi --h dealt with a piece of property at 6th and Hellman owned by Mr A Mrs.
Groomer. Ile had concerns regarding the change Dade by the Planning Commission
to the respective lat.d coo designations density.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Heg 4 Jess Groomer, owners of property at 6th and Hellman. Mr. Groomer
stated Chat the tax benefits to the city would be considerable if they
developed this property as stated in their letter,
Carry Brown, Building Industry Association, stated that they are Lit support
overall to the Development Code. lie felt that once the "bugs" were worked
out, it could become a model for other communitles. One co,tcarn, however,
was Cho section tainting to "Foothill Areas ". They felt the areas in :ia
foothills should be more flexible witn a 10% plus or minus variation.
Claud Elam, for Regina Builders, Inc. of Upland, addressed the 6th and
Hellman rezoning Issue. There are also two ether property owners present
with simillar desires as Mr. 6 Mrs. Groomer, This evening h4 is
representing Hr. Porattl, a land owner in the middle site. He wanted to
see medium density restored to the area.
)1• City Couocii Minutes
t November 16, 1'483
Page 3
Larry Dirorona, owner of property at 6th and Hellman, wanted to develop
their property into a duplex, triplex, and quadplex development.
Larry Williams, 6th and Hellman, owner of the most northerly parcel. He
stated he had received no notice of the public meeting. One of the
neighbors notified him of this meeting tonight. They also were going to
build duplex, triplex, and quadplexes, they bought the property with the
Idea that it was zoned 12 -14 unite per acre, and he desired to see the
density restored to eedium density.
There being no further response from ti:e public, Mayor Hikele closed the public
hearing.
6TH AND HELLMAN AREA ISSUE•
ACTION: Consenous by Council to retain the low- medium designation. When a
p an oea come in, Council can reconsider at that time.
TEN PERCENT REDUCTION IN THE VL DISTRICTS
1 ACTION: Consensus of Council to leave as is.
a •a
Hr. Buquet had A special concern near the western edge of the Industrial
Specific Plat, at gill and Baker. He stated that p:eaently in this area there
will be a conflict. A eimiliar area is the 6th and /zchibald which backs up to
an industrial area. He was concerned someone might coma in and purchase the
whole corner and develop an R -3 type project. If it were an Industrial Park
designation then that type of use occurring would be 3restly reduced. He was
concerned that the southeast corner might become a residential island.
Hr. Comas stated that if this is Council's wish, than staff would conduct an
amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan in conjunction with a General Plan's
i
change,
=1 ACTION: Council directed to continue with Ordinance 211, with 2nd reading for
P tTie meeting; for staff to bring forth an Industrial Specific Plan and General
Plan amendements for consideration at the first meeting in January,
j'. Hr. Dahl stated he wanted Co put a minimum square footage an single family
' detached housing, with a minimum of 900 square feet to become a past of the
O.volopment Code.
�i Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing to discuss the minimum size
of 900 square feet for single family detached houses,
d
There being no response, the public hearing was closed,
F ACTION: By consensus of Council, it was added a miniuua, site of 900 aquae*
KY e�for single family detached housing to the Development Cods.
City Clerk, Lauren M. Wasserman, read the title of Ordinance No. 211 fee a new
r7.
first reading,
w
A ORDINANCE NO. 211 (new first reading)
AN ORDINANCE JF THE CITY OF LVICHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING TIME 17, DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE, INCLUDING ADOPTION OF A DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
MAP, REPEALING THE INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE, AND REPEALING
TITLE 17 AND CERTAIN SECTIONS OF TILE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE.
MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to waive the full reading of
r ranee No. 211. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Frost absent).
a
v,.
16, 1983
Page 6
Mayor Mlk.tls eat the second reading of Ordinance No 211 for December 7th.
4B, ORDERING THE 'WORK IN COMNECTTnN WTTN ANWTArTnw wn It vne .
City Clerk, Lauren M. Wasserman, read the title of Resolution No. 83 -196.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -196
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMOVGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH
ANNEXAVON NO. 15 IO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AND ACCCPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO'S.
12237, 12137 -1 AND 12237 -2.
Mayor Mikelo opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no public
response, Mayor Mikele closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Moved by •hloneef, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No.
83 -196 and to waive full reeding. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Frost absent).
a w e s
Mayor Mikelu celled a recess at 8:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 P.M.
with all Council members but Mr. Frost present.
e a s e ♦
4C. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMTSSrON wnnTPTPA,,nw no ..ora,.......� e.. ...,.....- ._....
wperauonal montrication$ to the conditionu of approval Mich are intended to
resolve complaints and disturbances created by thin. establishment. The
business is located wlthln the Rancho Plaza located on the northwest corner of
Carnelian and 19th Street. Staff report by Rick Comez, City Planner,
Mr. Waseerman stated that the City Clerk had recleved a complete list of
Petitions. The ones Council now has is only a partial list. Council will be
given the complete set in the near future.
MayorlSlkals opened the meeting for public hearing. Addroaoing Council were:
Fran G. BCOOkinOs, Attorney, 399 W. Mission, rapresenting the appellant.
Ile addressed the issues which are hours of operation, noise pollution,
comparibllity with the aroe, and eating astabl.shment.
Larry Arcinage, owner of the Boar$ Head, spoke specifically to the things
he had accomplished to reduce problems.
Cane Collins, 7995 Orchard Street, General Contractor, had installed the
new sound proof door and sound board around the back door. Lie wanted
Council to be aware that these precautions had been completed.
Mayor Mikele asked for comments from those who were opposed to the appeal.
Addressing Council .+are:
Douglas Moore, 8339 Carden Street.
Robert Lenco, 5931 Buckthorn.
Maria Fajardo, 8600 hawthorn.
Bill Ungles, 6375 Sapphire Street.
Stella Headley, 6474 Jasper,
Steve Wright, 8271 Whlrlaway Court.
Melvin Futrell, 6623 Topaz Street.
City Council Minutes
November 16, 1983
Page 7
There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Dahl asked Lb. Futcher to rep.QCt on the number of calls sin�a 1982 to the
Sheriff'a Department, sad what the con:arns were.
Lt. Putcher stated that they had not •eceived any cells since October, 1982.
There were only two calls from the Boar's Head. One was a fight inside the
Boar's Hand and the second was a disturbance in the parking lot.
Discussion followed by Council regarding the 4 concerns.
MOTION: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to uphold the Planning
Commission's decision with the exceptinn that the hours of operation be left
from I1�•00 a.m. to 2800 w.m. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: rahly Buquet, Schlosser
NOES: Mikels
ABSENT: Frost
a • • a a
Mayor IMikels called a recess at 10800 p.m. The meeting reconvdned at 10115
P.m. with all Councilmembere but Councilman Frost present.
• a As a
SD. PPEAL OF PLA10lI1,1C COMCtISSION DECISION DENYffiC GENERAL PLIN AMElID14ENT
83 -04A MD ZONE CHANCE 83 -04A - CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS. A request co amen --tWe-
Lidnerai Plan Land Use pan trum Low Residential (2 -4 du /uc) to Medium
Residential (4 -14 du /ac) and a change of a.no from R -1 -8500 to R -3 /PD (Multiple
Family Residential) on approximately 7 acres of land located on the South side
of Highland, between Jasper and Carnahan - APV 201 - 214 -08. Staff report by
Rick Comet, City Planner.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were$
Dave Headley, 6474 Jasper.
Charles Sanders, 6453 Jasper,
Bob Abalone, 5486 Jasper.
Stella Headley, 6474 Jasper.
Marjorie Day, Attorney$ representing the largest landowner of 46 lots.
Doug Moore, 8339 Carden Street.
Bill tingles, 6375 Sapphire.
Bob Martin, 8263 Alta Loma Drive.
Dennis Martin, 8313 Orange Street.
? Dick Nelson, 6320 Holley Oak Drive.
Hike Pinnalto, 6606 Holley Oak Drive.
There being no further response from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public
V' hearing.
}
Mayor Mikels stated that the developer, Doug Corgen, had cent in a request to
r? continue the item to thw first meeting in Febi�ry.
s;
{ MOTION$ Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to continue item to the February lac
a meat ng of City Council.
i
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting, again, for public gearing.
'1
16, 1983
_G' t Page 8
Addressing Council were:
Dave Nelson asked if a decision would be made at the February meeting or
would this be continued again.
Mayor Hlkele stated that at the February lot meet.-. we would have an option to
deny or uphold the eppoal. However, we hope to have all the materials
necessary to sake a decision at that time.
Addressing Council wares
Bill Ungles, 6375 Sapphire Street.
Marjorie Day, Attorney.
Kenneth }lull, 8511 Orange.
Mario Valence, 0275 Alta Loma Drive.
George Kirkendall, 6441 Oseper Street.
NOTION: Previ"sly made by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to continue item to
February let meeting. Motion carriud 4 -0-1 (Frost absent). Council directed
staff to place the item at the first of the agenda.
a s i a a
Mayor Hlkels called a recess at 10:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at ll C5
p.m. All Councilcembers, but Hr. Frost were present,
a w a a a
5. NON- ADVERTISED °UBLIC HEARING
5A. CONSIDERATION OF At:ENDMENT TO CHAPTER 1.04 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER f0 REOE INE C RTAIN HORDS.
Staff report presented by City Attorney, Robert Dougherty.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public h- aring. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk, Lauren M. Wasserman, read the title of C.vanance No. 212.
ORDINANCE NO. 212 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 1.04 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
BY AMENDING SECTION 1.04.010 (G) TO REDEFINE THE WORDS
"MUST" AND "SHALL" AND BY ADDING SECTION 1.04..00 TO PROVIDE
THAT NO CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION OR ADMINISTRATIVE
REGULATION SHALL CREATE OR IMPOSE A MANDATORY DUTY FOR OR
UPON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA11ONGA OR ANY OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE
THEREOF ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF SUCH OFFICE OR
EMPLOYMENT.
MOTIONt Moved by Oahe, seconded by Schlosser to valve full reading of
Ordinance No. 212. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Frost absent),
Mayor Mlkels set second reading oL Ordinance No. 212 for December 7th.
6. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
6A. REQUEST FROM SOUT71LIJ CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TO SUPPORT RELICENSINC OP
HYDROELECTRIC' prOJPLrl'$,
Randy Bond, General Manager of Edison Company, was present and made a report to
Council.
City Council Minutes
November 16, 1983
Page 9
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl :o approve Resolution No. 83 -197 and
wTTull readirll, Notion carried 4 -0-1 (Frost absent).
City Clerk, Lauren N. Wasserman, road the title of Resolution No. 83 -197.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -197
A EESO ,'.UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TM4 CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF RELICENSING OF
HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY,
68. CONSIDERATION OF CATV CONSULTANT. Oral report presented by Lauren
Wasserman, City Manage r.
Mr. Wasserman stated that they we- - requesclna Council approve the decision of
the Subcommittee subject to ratification of the contract at the December 7ch
meeting. Mr. Wasserman introduced Michael Friedman, of Telecommunica;ion
Management Corporation.
ACTION: Council concurred.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
7A. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF AN AMBULANCE ORDINANCE. Staff report by Robert
DOUBT ,ory, .—Y Attorooy.
ACTION: Consensus of Council was co look at sn ordinance at the second meeting
in nuary.
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
hu items +ere submitted,
9. AOJOURIMENT
MOTION: !heed by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to a Closed
Session. Fwfon carried 4 -0 -1 (Frost absent). Misting adjourned at 11:30
P.m., not to reconvene this evening.
Respecttully submitted,
Beverly Authelut
January 4, 1984
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUILS
Regular Meeting
1_ CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Counci of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
In the Lions Park fomnunity Canter, 1161 Bale Line Road on Wadnesday, January
4, 1984. The meeting vas called to ori•r at 7:34 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels.
Present were: Couacilsembets Richard N. Dahl, Charles J. Bu�uet II, Phillip D.
Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon . Hikels.
Also present were: City Manager, Laurrn h.. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; CO=uaLtV Development Director, ,Ick Lam; City Planner, Rick Comet;
City Engineer, Lloyd Hubba; Community Seri cog Director, Bill Holley; and
Finance Director, Harry Empty.
Approval of Minutes: None had been submitted ' r approval.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Thursday, January 5, 1984, 7100 P.I. - HIS7111C PRESERVATION COMMISSION,
Mons Park Community Canter,
b. Wednesday, January 11, 1984, 7:00 p.m. - PIANNIN COMMISSION MEETING, Lions
Park Community Center.
C. Thursday, January 12, 1984, 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORT 1?21ISSION MEETING, Lions
Park Community Center.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
30. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 83 -12 -30 and 84 -1- , and Payroll ending
12 -25 -83 lot the total amount of $361,665.89.
3b. Alcoholic Beverage License Appalcation No. 84 -01 for Vet ran's Club License
for VFW Post 6680, 8751 Industrial Lane,
3c. Forward Claim No, CL84 -01 against the City by Blaine L. W. beau Canetruction {•
to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling,
3d. Forward Claim No. CL84 -02 against the City by Anthony Louth iartinez to the
City Attorney and Insuranco Carrier for handling,
3a. Forward Claim No. 84 -03 against the City by Moffatt 4 Nich 1 to the City
Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling.
3f. Approval of lease purchase afire sent, AG84 -Ol, of John Door, tractor and
Roseman rotary mower to replace equipment not serviceable for th workload.
Ibis is a budgeted item
39, Item removed for discussion.
fit :r Council Minutes
JAautr7 4, IP84
P =S* 2
3h. Acceptance of CCfiR's and Ralense of Agreement between the City of Fjmcho
Cucam.nga and TAG Development to provide CCWs prior to issuance of occupancy
Permits for Tract 11144.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORVIA, TO RELEASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITI OF RA1:CHO CUCAMONGA AND TAC
DEVELOPMENT AS RECORDED LS 111GUST 17, 1983 AS NO.
83- 189766.
31. Intent to Annex Tract hoe. 12184, 12237, 12237 -1, and 12237 -2 to Street
LLHhting Maintenance Districts vo. 1 and 2. It is recomeadad that City
Council adopt the resolutions app -0vfn4 the Engineer's Report and setting the
date of pL%lic hearing for February 1, 1984,
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -02
. RESOLUTION OP' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUC:IJOKCA CALIFO °.NIA, OF PRELIMINARY
:.PPROVAL Of CIT1 NCINEER'S FEPORT FOR ANNEXATION
NO. I TO STRLET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
1.
RESOLD -.ION NO. 84 -03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, rALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER T.•M ANNEXATION TO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE MHTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT: DESICNATINC SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSU /ltr TO TILE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1912 AhD OFFERTNC A TIME AND PLACE
FOI HEARING OBJBCTTONS THERETO.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -C4
A RESOLUTION 09 THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCA.MCHGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENCIN,tr S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION
NO. l TO STREET LIGHT' AINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
2
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -05
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THA CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2. AN ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTt DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LAIDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE
FOR HEARIN' )EJECTIONS THERP.TO.
3J. Sec public hearing date of January 18, 19x,1. - Environmental Aeeusament and
Zone Change 83-08 (TT 12525) - Truax. A change of zone from medium density
residential (8 -I4 du /ac) to low medium residential (4 -8 du /sc) for a total
dovelotaent subdivision of 16.5 acres into 123 lots, comprising 122 zero lot
line units generally located on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Turner
and Center Avenue - APN 209 - 091 -10.
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1984
Page 3
3k. Set public ht :,cing date of January 18, 1984 - Environmancal Assessment and
Development Code Amendment 84 -01. An amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga
Development Code, Title 17 of the Municipal Code, amending Section 17 08.040 -B
and 17.08.040 -C to require a Conditional Use Permit for single family detached
dwellings lose than 90D square feet.
31. Set public hearing date Gf January 18, 1984 - Environmental Assessment and
Sign Ordinance Amendment. An amendment to Title 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, Section 14.20.110 of Chapter 14.20, Signs, to change the
maximum height limit for a wall sign on an industrial building from :0 feet to
a height not to project above the roofllne.
3m. Set public hearing date of January 19, 1984 - Certification of
Environmental impact Rupert for Alta lama Drainage System Construction Project.
MOTICN: loved by Schlrsser, seconded by Dahl to approve the Consent Calendar
wT—Ihe deletion of item "g ". Notion carried unanimously 5-0.
DISCUSSIC!! OP IT@I " ": Approval of Condemnation Agreement with R.C. land Co.
orconatruc'ion o Training levee providing flood protection for Tracts 11934,
12044, 12045, and 12046. Approval Is recommended of agreement with R.C. Land
Co to cover all
costa involved in the condemnation of lands required for the construction of a
flood protection training levee. Mayor hlkels asked where the parcels for
condemnation were located and who were the owners. Mr. Hobbs responded that
they are basically located nortt of Highland Avenue, between Etiwanda Avenue
and Day Creek. It is within the County jurisdiction which involves three
parcels. One parcel is ryed by Caltrans as part of the freeway right -of -way.
There are two other owner4hlps: one by the McGuire family and the other parcel
is owned by a partnership of which Wayne Blanton is the contact parson. Mr.
Hubbe distributed a package to Council with the legal descriptions of the
properties.
Mayor Mikels asked what discussion had tarn place with the owners regarding
property acquisition. Hr. Hobbs stated th, owners have been contacted; one
owner wants to cell the entire property, and the other owner has taken a
similar position because he does not want to encumber the property at $3,000
per acre with this type of encumbrance.
Mr. Dougherty stated that even though the property was in the County, the City
could use eminent domain procedures to obtain the property for the purposes of
flood control.
Discussion followed.
Mayor Mikels stated he would like tc talk with the owners himself.
Mr. Hobbs stated they are under some time contrainte, but this could watt for
two weeks.
MOTION: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Buquet to continue to January 18, 1984
meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1984
Page 4
4. ADVERTIS - °D PUBLIC HEARINGS
4A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND C=R PLAN AMEHOMENT 83-048 AND ZONE CHANGE
83 -0 - SYCAMORE INVEST. In. M an_n mant Co t e Genera Pen Land Use Hap to
change t e nor[ east corner of Archibald and Base Line from an Office
designation to a Neighborhood Commercial designation and to change the zone
from Ap (Administrative Professional) to NC (Neighborhood Coamirclal) - APN
202 - 181 -27. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner.
Mayor Mikele opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vas:
Jan Crouse, from Sycamore Investments, encouraged Council's approval.
There being no further response from the public, Mayor 'Llkels closed the public
hearing.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 215.
ORDINANCE NO. 215 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 181 -27 FROM AP (ADMINISTRATIVE
PROFESSIONAL) TO NC (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) FOR
5.44 ,ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND ARCHIBALD.
MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to valve full reading of Ordinance
No. 215. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 215.
Motion cerried 3 -2 -0 by the following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser
NOES: Mikels, Frost
ABSENT: None
4B. ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 16 FOR TRACTS 12077 -I AND 12105 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. Staff report by—Uoyd Hobbs.
Mayor Hikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response
from the public, the public hearing was closed.
City Clark Wasserman rrad the title of Resolution No. 84 -06.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN
CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 16 TO IANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOP TRACT NOS. 12077 -1 and
12305.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No.
83-220 and valve full reading. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0.
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1984
Page 5
5. NON- ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
5A. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION - ZONING ORDINANCE DETERMINATION -
ALTA LOMA FEED STORE. An appeal of the Panning Commise ou s deelslon
regarding a request to determino if a feed store facility is appropriate for
the VL District of Etiwanda. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner.
Hr. wmez stated that the appellant had requested a continuance. Hr Naaserman
stated the reason was that their legal counsel could not be present this
evening.
Mr. Frost stated that this item has been discussed for several mouthe and he
felt thtw should not be continued.
Discussion followed as to whether the item should be continued.
Mayor Hikels opened the meeting for public hear.lg. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Hlkels stated the item will be continued to the meeting of January 18,
!qA4.
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
6A. FONTANA RESER%T ANNEXATION. The San Bernardino County LAFC is seeking
input from Fontana. Ontario, and Rancho Cucamonga regarding the future division
of the Kaiser Steal Preserve. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner.
Hr Nzsabrman stated that LAFC has tentatively set up a meeting. Staff will
notify Council when it has been confirmed.
Council concurred to continue this item until after the LAFC meeting.
6B. LAND USE ANALYSIS - 9TH STREET AND MADRONE AVENUE. At the December 7th
meeting, LSty Council directed staff to prepare a special lend use study
designed to determine optimal industrial and /or tesidentfal land uses within
the planning area bounded by Arrow Route, Baker Avenue, 8th Street, and the
County Flood Control corridor. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. There being no responso, the
open meeting was closed.
Hr. Buquet stated he brought this up at the time of the Development Code
hearings. His concern was while there was housing on the northeast portion
that is presently under consideration for R -3, he felt there would be Game
problems with an R -3 designation In there because there would be an
incompatible use up against single family housing. Another problem Is there
would be general 4ndustrlal backed up against that. He felt Council should
look at an Indubtrlal Park designation. That it would be more aesthetically
blanding with the n,lghborhood rather than a general industrial designation and
would also protect tie houses already there since it would be a long time
before this would be developed. He favored OF ton 2.
ACTION: Council concurred that this should go to the Planning Co®lsslon for
public hearings wirA Alternative 2 being their eholaa and to come back to the
Council for final Approval. pl-lf�
w.'S. �. \." �i yi �en'�1' sin .. . - s - .: .a eK �AiC. 4�iy -� 4K ys•n,
TL".,..
VAIG
—
' CLty�COUgc11 MLnutes
January 4, 1984
'
y
Page 6 -
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
Mr Dougherty stated he had nothing to report.
B. COUNCIL BUSINESS
There vas no business
9. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Dahl,
seconded by Buquet to adjourn to Closed Session not to
reconvene this evening.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned
at 8:12 P.M.
Pespectfully submitted,
Beverly Autheler
Deputy City Clerk
i
es•
'6