HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/01/15 - Agenda PacketC 'CAM
CITY OF
RANCHO GLCAN NGA
0 0
CITY COUNCIL
AGENEA
1977
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Reecho Cucamonga, California
All item submitted for the City Conseil Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these item is 5:00 p.n. ou the Wednesday prior to the
meting. The City Clerk's Office racemes all such item.
A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
B. Roll Call: Wright _, Buquat _, Mikele
Dabl _, and Ling
C. Approval of Minutes: December 17, 1985
December 26, 1985
yo 14 • i . a ♦ . t .
A. Thursday, January 16. 1986 - 7:30 p.m. - PAR[
DRVBLOPMfNr COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center.
9161 'ate Line Road.
B. Wednesday, January 22, 1986 - 7:30 p.m. - PLANNING
COMMISSION - Lions Park Conamuity Center, 9161 Base
Line Road
C. Thursday, January 23, 1986 - 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY
COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base
Line Road.
City Council Meeting -2- January 15, 1986
The
following Coast" Calendar its= are expected to be
routine
and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by
the
Council at one tier without discussion.
A.
Approval of Warreats, Register Ho'a. 1 -15 -86 and
1
Payroll ending 12 -26 -85 for the total amount of
$3.349.106.25.
B.
Approval to forward Claim ((186 -03) against the City by
6
Marcia Woblbietor for automobile damage near the
intersection of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road to
insurance carrier.
C.
Approval to forward Claim (CL86 -04) against the City by
7
Gary Steiner for motor scooter damage near the entrance
of tho Alta Vista Mobile Home nark on Base Line Road to
insurance carrier.
D.
Approval to forward Claim (CL86 -05) against the City by
8
Eugene and Eva Craig due to an automobile versus train
accident to insurance carrier.
E.
Approval to forward Claim (CL86 -06) against the City by
10
Glenn and Linda Parker for an automobile accident to
insurance carrier.
F.
Approval to forward Claim (CL86 -07) against the City by
12
Eugene Robinson for personal injury due to bicycle
accident on Arrow Highway to insurance carrier.
G. Approval to seek bide for the improvement of the 14
northerly side of Foothill Boulevard from 440 feet vest
of the intersection of San Bernardino Road and Foothill
Boulevard to 660 feet vest and authorise funds for
ccostruction of said project based on the Engineer's
estimate of $12,600.00 to come from Systems
Development.
B. Approval to accept improvement security ($2,706.00) for 16
median landscaping and release of improvement security
($30,OOD.00) previously submitted, fcc SA 80-09/PM 4735
located on the northwest corner of Haven and Banyan
submitted by The Southern California District of The
Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod.
RELEASE: Improvement Security (passbook): $30,000.00
ACCEPT: Labor 6 Material (cash): $ 2,706.00
City Council Meeting -3- January 15, 1986
RESOLUTION NO. 86 -03 20
A RESOLUTION UP IHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTINC
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR S.A. 80 -09 /P.M.
4735 ACID AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
Approval of Contract Cbacge Order No. 1 for Contract 21
(CO 85 -122) with L. A. WsinscotL 6 Associates for
additional work for the design and rigbt- of-way surveys
for the widening of the north side of Hamilton Avenue
from Cartilln Avenue on the east to the start of the
roadway extension at the vest and of the Deer Canyon
School property. An additional fee of $4,150.00 will
increase the contract amount to $21,850.00 to be paid
from Systems Development funds.
J. Approval to accept the League of California Cities' 25
financial conditions and proposed dues increase for
1986.
K. Approval of first phase of contract (C086 -03) for 32
computer system design with Environmental Systems
Institute (ESRI).
L. Approval of a minor revision to the 1985 -1988 Housing 59
Assistance Plan required by the U. S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development for all recipients of
Community Development Block Grants.
M. Approval to construct a mini - storage development with 71
Office totaling 45,000 square feet on 1.17 acres of
land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) District,
located on the north side of 4th Street, east of Turner
Avenue - APH 210 - 371 -03. (City Council couticued this
item at its November 6, 1985 meeting to allov the
Preparation of a Resolution of Denial.)
RESOLUTION NO. 86 -04 72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE AN APPLICATION FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -15, TO CONSTRUCT AND
MAINTAIN A MINI - STORAGE PACILITY ON PROPBRTY
WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND
LOCATED AT 10210 4TH STREET, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. AND MAKING FINDINGS TO
SUPPORT THEREOF.
City Council Meeting -4- January 15, 1986
N. Set Public bearing - February 5, 1986 - Development
RovieM 85--8 - Haven Avenue Food Court - Appeal of
Planning Commission Conditions of Approvsl.
0. Set public hearing for February 5, 1986, for
Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment
85 -03 - City of Rancho Ca.:amonga.
A. ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF ALMOND STREET 75
BEIVE_ EN_ BERYL aTRPET AND AMETHYST AVENUE, (Public
bearing to be continued to February 5. 1986.)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND D3VELOPMEXX CODE AME14nMENT 76
85-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Aa amend meat to the
Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Ordinance 211 to revise Sections 17.08.0407 and
17.08.0401, pertaining to the landscaping and slope
plantang, respectively.
001RAOCE NO. 284 (first reading) 87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL GY THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
TITLE 17, SECTIONS 17 08.040E AND 17 08.0402
OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING
LANDSCAPING EAD SLOPE PLANTING. RESPECTIVELY
C. ENVIRORMERTAT ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC 89
PLAN ENDMENT BS-OS - ITY OF RArr.+� - M
Amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan to add
Research and Development /Office use to the Haven Avenue
Overlay District.
ORDINANCE NO. 249A (first reading) 108
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -05 IN
ADDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT/OFFICE USE TO
THE RAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT BY AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 249.
City Council Meeting -5- January 15, 1986
0. ENVIROMMENSAI. AcsgceI ND DEO OPMEnT n a •p•p •Q7T 109
85-06 - C)SY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to
Section 17.02.130 of the Development Code pertaining to
Non- confuraiog use.
ORDINANCE NO. 285 (first reading) 121
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COOACIL OF THE CITY
OF RAYCNO CUCAMWCA, CALIFORNIA, AHERDINC
YITLE 17, SECTION 17.02.170 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, REOARDINO MCN- COMFORMIDO
USE
E. TREK PRESERVATION OanINAr g AMW MDNt<:x - proposed 126
amendments to Chapters 17.06 and 19.08 of the Reacbo
Cucsmauga Municipal Code pertaining to the preservation
of trees on private property. Continued from December
4, 1985 meeting. (Staff will be recommending a
continuance to cbe February 5, 1986 meeting.)
NO ITEMS SUBMITTED
A. REQUEST FROM CUC.AMONOA CITI 125
j98 MITION ARD 7RE INITIATIVE FOR TAPPAYER'S^RIC` TO
F• z-1SWcn R,
NO ITEMS SUBMITTED
o ^
cnI^ ocDC< tY�YwTrG r
-
r
zTO
w ^Tr z�.z nr n >r C ^
n.Y Yf�N mY
x
m
S
c
z
O
mSR
Y ^* ^TPDZ,T rf
TTC >T'>r ^S Cn
D
m
v
O
� r
N G
T
T nmC
am
r
.
f^ ^
=:r ` T.'n li °•
�
.
r r
S
Tin'.
.°.u�.T.
^ Ta^.ai'
z
Y
ors
rr�aac�NCi ^"
m
c
r
a
_
r) r V TN
<
SO
n
CC
y')
-_ S ONTrufi� NC
�
G
T
Nr
NCmr
^
v
m
i'w
n•
f^
i I•
T � 4u•ST
T
T
T
i2
D Y
T
A
D
°„T,
axJN
Try
N N N
.1
n'o ^ ^n�nnonoROO
•a
n
n
o o
n
rrryN
nn a0 <dd.•d ddw Nf O Y A. OORrR°.fr
`.i:ri: .
-Pr
�A O
..:�d:
a a
i1 0
i
- >
r P
iyi.N �r�r m�i, fOPf
0
R
m
T
I•t r
r
:.Poo:- 0.7)„i.po ^•'Nf :.:.'v
�
o r
r1fN
r^7nnOCO ^ ^NnCCO. PO
-
t
r
O
.
•
In
TO -ov��o nnr nn nn nr•n nnnr •nnPram�moa.Y r
ii-- xz- i•,- ='co,:
vTyio�": <aF:scliu
-- +�.io'`•
Yrxn
Y=�•
-
scn�c >P's�si� >yN n.. "s�na <i
-r CZ.z r•P�aNnm
- o -TYSYY rc e-.z
°
r
-� z-- vzr_cTS ^fir Y
�r in- °- imTnnLnn c: ^Pon �i
rzrr° °, ,^ �•.r i>Nr� ci
Na
c,� °n. r
n<z °nary n."r ,,,
y
isn,r,•� P
Y'"nT
a:.�a zzr•n'"
c r -r y r^ i it ^ w'•in N
S` TnO,"- Y�; N1TYTn Nm,Sr<1GC�Y(4f]� ^m < ^,<„'+^
,
/Ynm
n,.a Tn •^v SS ^ O)rC "'NC¢nTrwny+•n OT n.0 �'TC7^n
�D�l,
CT Orv= `unnrS «r�.Y.-- r1TnrTY u STrra N
Nn�- aniNe «w,z,
°YY..•Y- 1. ", +iz -T• "vin-- n`a
<27o
,T
T
n° „i„xn ra�i.rra
- -x.o„ n `xn�oMr
�O °,<D,T y•°•o•woN_i.xeo
n
vYn D+, < +x.
riT �saTa� a ris Sn'a zia :1, z" "
1
N N,n y ,r ,Si•
�
C O rs VOr On n n Or 00070 nnCn --n,)r n nn�, n
C
i
TsVM VVVJ'+N J
♦W4- n.'"j•ry rO YYNNVrw��u; �.1 lloi A
r
NJrw.r Orm��JJWNrrO(S NP Y «C�P -„l Ci
l
N 7
a+�++ N N�` rt
WS YP
T
wPVVPIJUrfOnf„°• JJNin
an -.oN OM «r,._Nr.- )...NiuNW -•• � JNr. N
•
N
� " ^COrJUri•
r UOWPOVI.J n.., .�- C00.1'O
ffJ•JNJ4 I.n r00 ^nO1,r U., ^n,°Sn
In
�w °n z��r'.vo' m`+i•.e- v= ' `:.o�rw.r
-fuim Ye' .'na:.�o .'. .-.��
n <�:o� ^r><xxYSS<zzr. -.•nr �. -�.-ar rzzr scnc.r.
...
C)a..
Mn. nmr A�T uj_r -- .m.. fm w.Y �l T +OTC
. P
•rC��.•aNLnn
Z ]•rC•.S
r-+ir nrYOr � rfDt �.�..nrn r• }nN _n•O n
�
Z4Sll >++'
-_mr� CZY. i^
=l= ♦Cr3; D -_tm a^
r
fF'C Sn1 Tf r� Trm'= SY>O
N
^rnrrr Y)Y
•r..�r- .cam` -cr >z •. ortfz'i .. .on >rr��rT
-
o °�.`. `nLin T° .�..+. ..zi�i<na 2 zti nrr >��c.- ••r`...ri
r
�rT.n :.' €a
rN
y
o ^r f
>� ^n riii -.N•.
i °i.rY.: pe• T.c c n _yaN n..
2>
r s
c_eN .. zr rani o:• mi'�n � a� n_
oz:' r.•N
N
o`
n=
r
_i nn<n n -rmp ^T °°.'e >Tr Tr m><omnn� par
_ n, o•`^)n.�:ie. n...- = aT+ni e...yTae °e
�r�)
'
r
�.. n .Nr. rr.: i i .TVr.•�_y�v�rr_n2
M)
.'.- r rTi >e i r t >f.9 AonP
C.
- .-
. ..
vrNC c _c�z n N
i oi` rcn c c..e
s � � > z .r- r n •..
� •^ N z. �r'nnn n n N on= n
- a -c
•
r
•
=a PD in = .r Zi
yO
OVe•p.. )MMnti •'Jnn Vin . ^Vn0 )nV
Jw .Mm• w... On7nO nn
�� C
.l
.. a�za.,M:,;--eA��s.m�^�sT�Pm
e
r!G- J.:an ^±^dJr':r:'.UO..�w-V OP C4r�N0 N:. w. Yr fJ :u tlu•�NrV
r
_ ao^ 000uo ^n ou Jp+ on JO-oon.•no -. a.
.
fe��of>r.v:nYf
'.Nmw�•
1r. r. ..c^ In
=. �.�My^r
Pr.OV rPNdd�d <•.r rPPr.CYNrrf u^••.f ONO. +u♦•N
.Y
nr.a � ^✓ •'•
a
arSrf OOOL O'� Tn nj�y♦
>rm.rr�'A- >ccccc�m <s ^<f is °i:inrT�r
a
TC O•>ai
>rm`z�ra�nPm
c>.czrNZizzzx DNnz•.a zc:>
=>zYNL
r��f2�r�io ^moo anunn�� os
sc :i mma. S).>ia
r' °o :. °..rc
^^ ..N L�-•i.c c:.`.: C �a°r♦mr >;zsri> mrm♦mz ^
w
.am.
N D 0 r
T
°m
Ty^ Vnnr
i
�zz ^ ai s`; rrn -v r nips c•
t
nr r SnD 2YY »Y >9yArN " ^` ^D n
Y.
.Jr O
`00000
^ + ^D rn
.
n uC� •
fl<
m
C •<n nn
�
=OOf•^
r n LY r . V °1
r
Y • r
OUOC� m
^�T�u�n..C.. '•',d.•�ClmY1f)SI
'
Ir'•.^..O ^Pf C. u•fnr°mO ar<NC
'f
=•♦f �• n)O . +0¢_ D_mSP3Nm inn_Crmm
°N nSn
!^_ °`^
`w>2T�• °i� ^rrLDN�O•T��9Yr'!nC ar NI`
f•.
"non
�.<n = °.z. .'. )'na.a m.,• 3�i- °-
°r n'^""a°.:AONOic
r
m .Yr .N^n •s^s:s ^yCnr3r•.•m
^r�>.n.waT O'ncs
'�°n
.z..<„���•n_<Tr nm�> za
zr m � aoN .. -•n ...
zrw T.zzr:ima. >•io -n �rni
>n Nmm
PC
imy � ° � �.oN z ^m o- •^rcNNr oonrrm
� s
n ^ow+�
c cizr xn a n
ncT
M N
r rz� ... '•' n N
r m �
• .. o • mom♦
'
n n N N N nnnnn N•�n r. ..n nV• nNn P
A ,rx"i>r-
nanr zna r a a< aac A
:•,). Nara• Y M M 77 °
° ^•'P' ni��,y in.dp ed �.d.. d's ndrdneen � a o
N1WNr%♦d m..PUlWVrn <m- N ywWVrnd•a vP
i
rVPVrVNruYNrY+u<aN Nu�VNrPruNOYU d "•c �L "O•
r. . w^ ......♦P r•n ^M 1VdW.rJ
P rY w�.nNnWV ONd )
�`yUdNnYrNMfOdN dr.0 ^UwNnCN�UpYyOr N n • r
dVC•"OUCVCrVrINnnOPnNO ^ ^r_ydOn OV�CC °i �)Yw ,
VJ^
n C
O�N.�WWO
YS1 >S
a��rxWr
• <:�mz
+P 1
D ^
.• 2
(Liv SYr 1C �
vT ^M�
4G :�
zo
Tc.'r ^z
O^ •D
S LLC
S�
i • t
V CV^`aJC^ �1
dYi(y�CO
WN +^JONti
7
C1N �uNi!
P
a
r
y
i
C
i
CLAMS PO4 DAN1G6 OR iR]ORT 1 �`�-E �c•
Claims for death, injury to person, or to personal property moat be filed no later U �4, 03
than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov, Code, Sec, 911.2),
2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed no later than 1 year the
occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2).
TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r
Remo of Claimant Address Zip Phone Age
) ',. ! �7'r t C rn r (11
Address to vhYcb Claimant vishes notices sent.
WHIR did damage or injury occur? 1 -c , , s. , ` I 1 i L.
VNZRN did damage or injury occur? S Q._..v Ct,..
-- tr
NOW and under vhst circumstances did damage or injury occur? 1 .•,.T
�R ! r9 Lain T— 1 L,
i- ti 1 =n itg s.
WHAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or
injury? ( Tnclude manes of employees, if know).
What sm do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as
it may be known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together vith the basis
of computation of the amount laimed. (Atzacb estimates or bills, if possible).
L k c 1 \ 3} Tali tG( g l C C C
7C rC-
gS- C C
Total Amount Claimed:
NAM and addresses of vitnesses, doctors, and hospitals!
I
J
r Ct_41\�u.t I�j
Dale
9igmatura o Claimant
CIA-4 VL
CLAM FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY
Cl 9r' - DL/
1. ^aims for death, injury to person, or to personal property must be filed no later
than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, See. 911.2).
2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed no later than 1 year the
occurrence (Gov. Code, Sea. 911.2).
TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Name of Claimant Address Zip Phona Age
s/pA
Address to which Claimant wishes nottces sent.
MM did damage or injury occur?
WHERE did damage or in'ury occur? 6,f jr a.,l.«._ pi/ /� _i• �i /p 8 ��,
HDN and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur?
i
WHAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or
Injury? (Include names of employees, if known).
19
WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as
It may be known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the bass of
computation of the amount claimed. (Attach eatimatos or bills, if possible).
Total Amount Claimed: 6731 77-
NINCS and addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitals:
/a e -8d` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON�
Date A MIMSTR MON
S03(478)-RC(H) DEC 30 US
81101111142 i3Aq('�16
1 7
Signature o 1a1ma� nt
(:11 a e' )
1
2
3
4
8
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 .
26
27
28
BRUGGEMAN, SMITH i PECKHAM
524 N. Mountain View Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92401
Telephones (714) 884 -6254
Attorneys for Claimants
EUGENE and EVA CRAIG
In the matter of the Claim oft
EUGENE CRAIG and
EVA CRAIG,
Claimants,
V.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
Respondent.
vt1 'C�J ! C(t(r
C(iY Of VXW rUCpM4rtCA
ADMINISTRATION
Blfllnlu{�Ill�l9t�8
CLAIM FOR INDEMNITY/
PARTIAL EQUITABLE
INDEMNITY
TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY CLERK
P O. Box. 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Claimants, EUGENE CRAIG and
EVA CRAIG, hereby make a Claim for indemnity /partial
equitable indemnity as followst
1. Claimants' name and address aret Eugene and Eva
Craig, C/o Bruggeman, Smith a Peckham, 524 N. Mt. View Avenue,
San Bernardini, California.
2. Please send all notices tot Bruggeman, Smith & Peckham,
Attention Paul R. Falter, 524 N. Mountain View Avenue, San
Bernardino, California 92401.
3. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this claim
are as followst
Claimants have been served with a Summons and
Complaint by MRS. AMINTA ORTEGA and TOMAS DAVID ORTEGA, for
1 wrongful death of THOMAS ugVID ORTEGA as a result of an
2 automobile versus train accident occurring on May 24, 1985 in
3 Rancho Cucamonga, California. The allegations against
4 Claimants are that they failed to maintain property located at
8 7082 East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, thereby
8 obstructing the view of THOMAS DAVID ORTEGA, resulting in the
7 accident on May 24, 1985 which caused his death.
8 4. The name and address of the public employees
9 responsible for Claimants' injuries and damages are unknown.
10 5. The amount of Claimants' claim as of this date is a
11 claim for indemnification /partial equitable indemnity in an
12 amount not known at this time, and an undetermined amount of
13 medical expenses to be incurred in the future, as wall as
14 unspecified general damages prayed for in the complaint filed
15 against the Claimants h.rein, entitled Ortega v. Southern
16 Pacific Transportation Company, at al., Casa Number OCV 36843
17 :sled in the San Bernardino County Superior Court, Ontario.
18 6. The basis for he calculation of the said amount is as
19 followse Amounts presently ura3cortainnd, will be subject to
20 proof at the time of trial of the above stated action.
21 7. The Law Offices of Bruggeman, Smith 6 Peckham, and
22 particularly Paua R. Walter, have bean retained as counsel for
23 Claimants and have presented thi•e claim on behalf of said
24 Claimants
28 DATED: December 30, 1905
26 BRUGGEMAN. SMITH 6 PECKHAM
27
ze ay: Luc/ 1
PAIL tI Was: ER
y
1
2
3
4
5I
6
7
a
9 III
10
11
12
13
14
is
16
17
16
19
21 II
22
23
24
25
26
27
2a
mrACa scow ma ntslo nuv oxL)/ ,
ce,' nip tY^ .fit I tF �� /fl
CLINNIN. NIRACUD[ a BCLGH[n
>oo wvfw Ifevi! msn �
P! W04[!. GLIIOIIx111 l001> I
imwawL Itl 11 !iH )!!
Tm i[[OOi[
c� G -off
CITY OFERANCHO CUCAMONGA
Ar<ngi for Defendant, CHRYSLER CORPORATION ADMINISTRATION
JAN 2 iW
As IN
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF tN,I PORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN CERNARDINo
GLENN R PAn -=R,
LINDA ^ARKER
r,. v NO OCV 36391
Plaintiffs, rl,:_p AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY
1CO PAY NOTICE (Government
t.ILLIAAM EVANS, NILLIMI THURLOW rr.r1^ Section 905, 905.2
EVANS, CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a 01C end 910.2)
Delawar^ Corporation, CIfY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES 1 to 100.
Defendants
TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOtr.A:
CHRYSLER CORPORATION hereby Fr. °rerts its claim against
r'•e City Lf Rancho Cucamonga and makes She following statement
in support of the claim:
1 Claimants name is CHRYSLCF CORPORATION. Claimant's
post offices address is: P. O. Box 1019, Detroit, MI 48208;
2 Notices concerning this claim should Lie sent to
Kurt Stiefler c/o Clinnin, Si:acusc ' Pe?cher, 700 S. Flower
St., Ste. 2400, Los Angeles, Ca:ifo_r<r.
3. The dete and plcce of occrrrerce giving rise to
/p -1-
r I
1 this claim are February 12, 1985 and the intersection of Archibald
2 and Banyan Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga, respectively;
3 The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows:
4 4 On or about February 12, ''^ et the intersection
5 of Archibald and Banyan Street in the of Rancho Cucamon ^a,
6 plaintiffs, Glenn Parker and Linda Pe ri were involved in
7 an automobile accident with William "ter- Plaintiffs contend
8 that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 'r come way responsible
9 for a dangerous condition of the streets et the 10e tion where
10 the accident occurred; plaintiffs con-end that ..e Chrysler
11 vehicle in which they were riding wac re,:ligently manufactured
12 and /or designed so as to cause or to contribute the plaintiffs
13 damages. claimant contends that if a dangerous street condition
14 caused or contributed to the accident et rlleged by plaintiffs,
15 claimant would be entitled to contribi•tre- by City of Rancho
16 Cucamonga for any damages awarded to rip-rtif£s
17 5 Claimant is unaware of the injuries sustained by
18 plaintiffs or the damages sustained by thcni, if any
19 6. The names of the public emplolres causing the injury
20 damage or lose are unknown to claimer-_ :r of this date
21 7 The amount of the present cl.._n is unknown; .t depends
22 upon the value of plaintiffs case, .. .r;
23
24 DATED: December 24, 1985 L1.: t...: tl SIrtAC S 6 BELCBER
25 dy:
26 niRT T FLER, Attorney
ici defendant, CHRYSLER
27 COi POP.ATION
28
/ / -2-
v�rt �n.m� run nu%c rnur mtr,
2
�
Soa'7Yo/L..a. �Lwd- r$�w4 trr
••.I.,.�.^''�^�-� — °�
o, �`�ronwa 9l)dS
I
I77J/StJ -ltfJ
� c
L11— O�p'OJ
4
3
I Attm e)i tor___ Claimant__
I
•
7
Ca OF ql
AD MNMRA
s
I
JAN 3 I
9
7�q1
10
,
II
,I In the Matter of The Clain of
12
EUGENE ROBINSON
I CLAIM OF FUGENE ROBINSON:
17
Claitant
PURSUANT TO S 905, 905.21
910 and 910.2 OF THE
14
I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
GOVERNMENT CODE
IS
Defendant
I
1
16
1
17
TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA:
Is
EUGENE ROBINSON hereby makes
claim against the City of
19
RancFj Cucamonga in the sum of $50,000.00
and makes the following
20
statements in support of tho claim
as follows:
21 i
1. Claimant's Poet office
address is 8601 Willow Drive,
22
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91703.
23
2. Notices concerning this claim should be sent to
24
the Law Office Of John M. Polakovic
at 500 West MisNinn Boulevard,
25
Suite 210, Pomona, California 91766.
26
3. The date and place of Occurrence giving rise to this .
27
Clain is December 27, 1985 on Arrow
Highway in the City of
28 (((Rancho
Cucamonga, California
I
I
1 4. The circumstances giving rist to this claim are as follows:
2 The claimant was on a bicycle on Arrowhighway when his tire fall
9 into a rut in the road, covered by water, and caused him to fall
4 to the ground, breaking his left shoulder upon impact.
5 S. The entity responabile for the injury is the City of
6 Rancho Cucamonga.
7 6. Claimant's claim as of this date is in the sum of $50,000.01
8
9 Dated: Jan. 2, 1985
10 vlt
JOHD S. FULAKOVIC
11 1 Attbtney for Claimant
14
17
18
19
21
24
2711
28
2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 15, 1966 191%
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval to seek bids for the improvement of the northerly side of
Foothill Boulevard from 440 feet west of the intersection of San
Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard to 660 feet west
The plans and specifications for the said project have been substantially
completed, therefore, at this time, the Engineering Division requests
permission to seek bids for construction. It is planned to fund this project
from System Development, the Engineer's Estimate for this project is
$12,600.00.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council grant approval to seek bids for the
improvement of the northerly side of Foothill Boulevard from 440 feet west of
the intersection of San Bernardino Road and Foothil Boulevard to 660 feet
west and to fund this project from Systems Development based on the Engineer's
Estimate of $12,600.00.
Respectfull subqitted,
"'LBH:1'.DL ,1! as
L/
/V
CHINA ALLEY PROJECT SITE
O�ojecf 9ife
-Aeimilv Ma
no o sea e
O 'CA,Io
g` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAVj NG.X
a z
ENGINEERING DR'ISION
�m ' VICINITY H1AP /s N
Pass
ALLEY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 15, 1986
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of impraement security ($2,106.00) for median
landscaping and release of improvement security ($30,000.00)
previously submitted, for SA 80 -09 /PM 4135 located on the northwest
corner of Haven and Banyan submitted by The Southern California
District of The Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod
The developer wax condi•loned to Construct right -of -way improvements including
construction and landscaping of median islands, parkway landscaping, sidewalks
and repair to improvements damaged during construction. A $30,000.00 passbook
account was secured to insure their Installation. To date, all improvements
have been constructed except median landscaping, which the City now prefers to
incorporate into its Haven Avenue Beautification plans. Labor and material
costs for the required median landscaping are projected to be $2,106.00. The
developer has submitted this amount and now wishes the passbook account to be
released. The right -of -way improvements have been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council ax ^pt said improvements and pass the
attached resolution authorizing the Cit; Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the passbook account
improvement security in the amount of $30,000.00.
Resp! fully ubmfttted,y
LBH:LNaa
Attachment
ASSIFV•:C.Y'
California Jlttrict of 04 lut1eraa
o.M Syrod heroin called ASSIGNOR•
hereinafter reforrad to ae ASSIGNEE all right title and interest
of whatever nature, of assignor. In and to the Insured account of
assignor In the First Interstate Pant
evidenced by a — ass aoc.
In the amount o'--5 �— numooieTT7
which Is delivered to t e su ipnea ewvic Asalpnor agrece t st
this asalgnmant carries with It the right in the Insurance of the
account by tla Federal savings am loan Insurance Corporation am
Includes and gives the right to tee - signs* to redeem. collet,
and withdraw the full amount of nch account at any time without
notUe to the asslgmr. AsalVVnor ayyreea that this assignment is
given as security for SA SO.09 /F.R. 1715 - construction am 1 /ndi6IPine of
approved median Island, partway landseaping, rldewtlks. and repair to Iprove-
,"ts diu9ed during construction.
at t e asugnoe my. wtc�i uf. notice to assignor. redeem. col-
lect and withdraw the account for the purpose of paling for any or
all items authorized by the sold nareement.
Assignor hereby notifies the above -named Savings and loan Association
Of this asslgnmert.
Dated this /74 day of _C)L �f .
{�, 19,s
G CaL/Oril/«,I- Ltn75
�Ttfa' l�
ay ...
r
RECEIPT OF hb'IC[ OF ASSIMTW
Receipt Is hereby acknowledged
to Me Assignee of written notice
of the assignment to said Assignee
of the account and Certificate
Identified above we have meted
In our records the Assignsa•s
Interest In said account as shown
by the above asalgrwent and have
retained a Copy of this sheet we
certify that we have received no
notice of lien, encumbrance, hold,
claim, or obligation of the above-
identified account prior to the
seal gnpnt to the Assignee. ws
agree to Bake puvment to the
Assignee upon request in accordance
with the savings and loan law
applicable to this association
Dated this _day of n9
jii _—
19
3ann"�J,t'%A.atG�e �d'
OF 2
Hama am tl o car
W1S OQ )41%1.
RECEIPT FOR CCRTIrICAn MO
bIMC-10q TO PAY '1r%r r—
Receipt Is acknowledged of the
above assigment and the Certi-
ficate Identified in the above
assignment _
is haraby auchornted and directed
to pay any earnings on the above-
identified account to the above -
named assiqur until otherwise
notified •. writing by the
Dated this day of
19—
• 5 e
By
city Ing, near
Minor /s wimlor
_ =- : _ -
THE LUTHERAN CHURCH-MISSOURI SYNOD
-
A ♦a: � � a
'•a °.
C mAlwmlct mRtwRLSiAT[LAIUt
r4f 1 /ILL
tLtR
"" ��1
-
•^
Fo
LImLt0lepN nw wtaurouu
I -_ — lO3AWtt[i CNIOQNAiW]1 /IA _ AMNnLww,mU
•
a
-
R 57051 " --
-� ?_o January 7, 1986 - `-
}Ar.
_ �-.� py p
=PAY � _ !I�aTa(Gi uti lTT fi 7ii GaTT�'J��'i
'I
-To Tr owoclt or =_ t 1.S
- ,706. = -
x 00
- _tl ATTN, -IAN _ =- _ == - - THE LUNIERAN CHURCH- AUTSOURI SYNOD -
-_
-SHEPHERD
SHEPHERD OF THE HILLS LUTHERAN CHURCH - utt
•_ -
BUILDING FUND -_--_
au SlTa
_Ii�_•
��
_ - 6162 HAVEN AVENUE - -
,__.,
_ _ RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91701 -
AUTtl=i Nu
_ _ lab n wo1 nnrwnn rA1Ya,r whew w e+n me, un
°_= L'057051L' t :1220002mg1484001 lt. L1
_ Iw1I11pISlD fgr1Al11Y
Minor /s wimlor
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF RA11C110 CUCAMONGA
P. 0. Bo. 807
Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730
160 RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM;NGA
P. 0. Bo, 007
Rancho Cucamen98. California 91770
NOTICE Of COPTLETIOY
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TKAT:
I. The undersigned It an omer of an interest or estate In the
hereinafter de3CMbed ral property. the nature of which Interest or estate
Is:
S.A. 80- 051P.M. 473S
2. The full name and addre :s cr tN undersigned owner is• CITY OF
RANCHO CVCAMNGA. 9720 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. So. 807. Rancho Cucampnga,
California 91770.
O. Oil the ISIh day Of January, 1988, there was Completed on the
hereinafter described real property eM mrs of Isom,ea<nt at forth in the
contract docuemts far:
S.A. 80-OS/P.M. 4775
A. The name of the original contractor for the wort of I:proeement
as a whole was:
The Southern CAllform. District of no Luthern Church, Missouri Synod
5. The real property referred to herein is situated In the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, CallfonAa, and Is described as
follows:
Th2 40 TWEST CORKER OF MAVEN AND BANYAN
CITY OF RAXND CUCA4MGA. a
Runicipal corporation, Omer
ante Lloyd u s, City EngineW
/9
RESOLUTION 110. E&�M- $ Co -03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR S.A. 80- 05 /P.M. 4735 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for SA 80 -05 /PM 4735
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby acceptod and
the City Engineer is authorizes to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15tn day of January, 1388.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
oon 0. i e s, Mayor
yoM r
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet—,TTFy-rTerT
1, BEVERLY A. AUi'HELET, CITY CLERK of the �'ty of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso.ution was duly passed,
apprc,ed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at
a regular (special, adjourned; meeting of said City Council held on the * day
Executed this * day of *, 19 ** at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ever y t e e ti yyZTerlc
M
CITY OF RANCHO CUCASIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: o�nuary 15, 1986 19'
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: L1oy6 B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY. Blane Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 85 -122) with L. A.
Wainscott L Associates ,
The attached Engineering Services Contract Change Order is submitted for City
Council review and approval. The change order is for additional survey and
right -of -way workings tc the Engineering Services Agreement for the widening
of Hermosa Avenue from V toria to 19th Street and for the extension of
Hamilton Avenue *rom the 6 Canyon School to Hermosa Avenue. The additional
work will provide survey for the widening of the north side of Hamilton Avenue
from Cartilla to the west end of school property or that point where the
s eat extension will begin.
The final improvement plans for the widening of this existing street will be
prepared by in -house staff.
RECOMIENDATION
It is recommended that the Engineering Services Contract Change Order No. 1
for Hermosa Avenue Widening and Hamilton Avenue Extension be approved in the
amount of $4,150.00. This sum shall be paid from the Systems Development
funs. J
Respectfully vubmit ed,
` j /
LBH:tWF:jaa
Attachment
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Changcnrdr
ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
ONIRACT FC: -Order No : 1
Hermasa Avenue Widening and Hamilton Avenue Extension December 12, 1985
Date:
TO: L A Wainscot. 6 Associates, Inc
ngineer
You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for
engineering services. For the widening of 1060 linear feet • of Hamilton Avenue
between Cartilla Avenwe and the westerly boundary of the Deer Canyon School
TOTAL $4,150 00
JUSTIFICATICN-
Work not included in the original Request for Proposal
The amaunt of the Cbrtract will be (DOCSeased) (Increased) by the sum of: Four
Thousand One Hundred Fifty and 00 /100---------- - - - - -- Dollars (5 4.150.0
The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: w n -gig_
Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty and DO /100 ------------- - Dollars (f�,850.D0 1
The Contract period provided for completion will be (increased)jDerreassly (Uo�
21 Days
This document will become aassuupppllement to the Contract and all provisions will apply
Requested: 'Yd � %�
Requested•
�soyo�e. HbbbS, ty ng Qeer late
Accepted: /, // CI �OI� 7 —45'G
— "`- f --`-"' Engineer �' ate
Approved:
Mayor, cy or ancho Cucamonga Date
,onga on w e us as record o any angel o e or g na eng veer ng —
agrecment dated: D6a.4, f 9B5
DESCRIPTION 0 HAIL GES DECREASE
INCREAT
in Contract Price
In Contract Price
Task
BI
- Field Survey
$2,900 00
Task
a3
- Pavement Evaluation and Design (by City)
(by City)
Task
/4
- Environmental Initial Study
N/C
Task
d5
- Construction Plans (by City)
(by City)
Task
A6
- R/W Legal Descriptions
$1,250 00
Task
f1410
- llo change to contract prices
II /C
(See attachment E Disclaimer)
TOTAL $4,150 00
JUSTIFICATICN-
Work not included in the original Request for Proposal
The amaunt of the Cbrtract will be (DOCSeased) (Increased) by the sum of: Four
Thousand One Hundred Fifty and 00 /100---------- - - - - -- Dollars (5 4.150.0
The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: w n -gig_
Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty and DO /100 ------------- - Dollars (f�,850.D0 1
The Contract period provided for completion will be (increased)jDerreassly (Uo�
21 Days
This document will become aassuupppllement to the Contract and all provisions will apply
Requested: 'Yd � %�
Requested•
�soyo�e. HbbbS, ty ng Qeer late
Accepted: /, // CI �OI� 7 —45'G
— "`- f --`-"' Engineer �' ate
Approved:
Mayor, cy or ancho Cucamonga Date
,onga on w e us as record o any angel o e or g na eng veer ng —
agrecment dated: D6a.4, f 9B5
y
EXHIBIT A
ADDENDOH /1
! Additional scope of services to widen approximately 1060 lineal feet of
Creek Avenue between Lartilla Avenue and the Westerly boundary of the Deer
Creek Elementary School:
lask 1 - Field Su,yeX and Aerial Photaltraphy
a. No change to this subtask. We propose to Prepare the base plan
for the additional Hamilton Avenue work by conventional drafting
methods. This area will not be mapped by aerial photographic methods.
b. Establish additional centerline control and stationing.
c. Tie a total of eight (8) additional property corners to the center-
line control survey for the following parcels:
AP 202 - 201 -39
AP 202 - 201 -40
AP 202 - -201 -37
AP 202 - 201 -27
AP 202- 201 -35
AP 202 - 201 -36
AP 202 - 201 -72
AP 202 -201 -54
d. No change.
e. Provide additfonal street cross sections at SO foot miximum intervals.
`. Perform additional topographic survey to pick up visible surf see
culture.
s
8• No change.
The additional cudgeted cost for this task is $ 2.900,00,
Task 3 - Pavement Evaluation and Oes1 n
The engineering report will he �QJ
Northerly half of Hamilton gvanu �f •to include wlderu{,
nine (9) feet. 8 the existing
The budgeted cost for this ��))
(dlttonel task is $ D�
00.
Ir
k
�3
Task 4 - Environmental Initial Study
The environmental initial study will be expaned to include the additional
work on Hamilton Avenue.
Task 5 - Construction Plans
The construction y1 will include the additional work on Hamilton
Avenue. One (lj Y�ditlonal 40 scale plan and profile sheet, one (1)
additional strjpip plan sheet, and one (1� additional cross section work
sheet are anti�pated. "l\
Add the i "ing basic street impra��ejgln to the original scope:
g. Widen the Northerly half of flamiTCon Avenue by nine (9) feet (1060
LF). The new improvements pill include PCC curb and gutter only (no
sidewalk). The existing ,(pent will not be overlayed.
The budgeted cost for this is S2 All 00
Task 6 - R/W Legal Descriptions
Six (6) additional 1_gal descriptions rnd plats will be prepared.
The additional budgeted c•.st for tnis task is $1,250.00.
Task 1 through 10
There is no change in the scope or budgeted cost for these tasks.
The City shall prepare quaitity and cost estimate for the inclusion of
this work in the project hid package.
Disclotmer: L F Wainscott i Associates assumes no responsibility or
liability for the designk rr plans prepared by City forces other than for
field survey and the writing R/W Parcel Descriptions.
C;)'/
ai Cc�
�■° League of California Cities
g� 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO CA 95614 • 1916) 4445780
a wro c VS y
•�m� /
Sacramento, CA
Decerber 18, 1985
TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks in t:en- Manager Cities
FRCM: pat Russell, Council President
of California Cities los Angeles and President, League
SUBJL=: League of California Cities- Financial Condition and proposed
Dues Increase
The League of California Cities' Board of Duectoce by una„imous vote is
Proposing an increase In dues in the amount of six percent (66) whlen
represents a total net increase in revenues to the League in 1986 of
approximately $77,861 or 3.26. The action of the Board of Directors nets to
be confirmed by the League's 13 regional divisions by February 14, 1986. ThO
following mein provides a summary of the League's financial condition, its
Proposed dues schedule and the line item budget for calendar year 1986.
You are urged to ame*dlately review the enclosed materials and should you rave
questions regarding the proposed budget, you are encouraged to contact t11e
Executive Director Don Bmnninghoven in the Sacramento office of the Leagw or
murbers of the Board o; Directors and to express your feelings regarding the
dues increase to your respeetire League division.
eackuround: The Wa9w of California Cities is a voluntary association of
cities, I am pleased to report that the League continues to have 10ui
merterahip and that in 1985 duns reorasented approximately 596 of the total
revenue while 316 was from conterences and institutes, 5.58 from the Mutual
Exposition and 4,56 from investment Income.
In the past, it has been the policy of the League to have large periodic duns
increases, usually 5u6 to offset inflation art- costs of needed service
prograne, Last Year, when the membership agreed to a duns increase, it was
the strong recommendation of city officials that the Le egtio make every effort
to avoid large periodic duos increases in [he Cuture ague 1983 amendment to
the League irectitutlor. and RY'Aws addressed that concern by authorizing the
Boards y. Directors, by a two- third's vote, to increase dues up to 109
annually.
The amendment weOL on to provide for rattfication of any dues increase by the
regional divisions within 60 calendar days from the ate Of sutrmlttal by the
Board Of Directors. Ratificati C
on by a majority of division representing a
malority of cities is required. Rog tonal divisions not responding within 60
calendar days shall oo considered to have ratified the duos increase.
Current Pinanclal Condition: League dues increase approximately 1.66 per year
It i e expenses are entrees ng on an average of 106 per year. Attached i9 the
line Item budget for the League of California Cities, inchxting the 1985
C;��
proposed bud;et, estimated actual expenses for the calendar year and the
proposed 198b budget.
At the end of 1985 the League's financial condition is good, lowor than
expected expenses, along with greater attendance at league conferences and
institutes, has parmitt d the league to m- establish its prudent reserve and
at the same t_me continue to move forwari with a sound service program and a
stro,q legislative advocacy program while also implementing a major data
processing /office automation effort that will permit the League to enhance its
legislative, membership and legal services to the membership.
Propossl: The league Board of Directors, as authorized by the League's
Constitution and Bylaws, is proposing a 6% dues increase, which will result in
approximately $77,861 in new rawnua for calendar year 198' This dues
increase represents a modest 3.29 increase in general purg. revenue for the
League. While city general purpose rownws am estimated tc increase
approximately 7 1% in 1985 -86 according to the State Department of Finance,
the league is able to maintain its "mice program and build upon that very
successful program with this dues increase.
In 1986, the league of California Cities, in addition to carrying out the wide
range of services undertaken last year, will add the following activities:
— Completion of implementation of the data processing /office automation
system. The league has purchased a Hewlett- Packard 3000 with the
appropriate software to greatly enhance Our word processing capabilitios,
list management and publications management, legialatiw bill service and
electronic mall, library management, seminar and conference management,
research analysis and accounting.
— Public Information 'ctivitleu for three Jime propositions which will
greatly impact on local governnrnt: tort reform, minatatement of general
obligation bond financing, and guarantee of the motor vehicle in lieu fees.
Tl•se issues are of vital concern to cities and a well Organized public
information program will be initiated beginning in January 1986 that will
require additional staff support and resources.
— Study the feasibility of creating an excess liability insurance statewide
fund.
— The League office in Washington, DC, has provided an important link to both
activities of concern to California cities and our relationship with the
National league of Cities. The roard of Directors is proposing to maintain
our Washington office with a full time staff position.
These activities, coupled with the on-going programs provided by the League,
are contained within the proposed 1986 line item budget.
-2-
06
'ESTIMATED YEAR CND
•PROPOSED 1956 DUDGLT
LCAGOE Or CALI)ORMT. CITIES
LI.N INN. bud 961
S.ATEMEMT Or ECVCN:IC L C1p1MDITIIF[S
MLV =MY [Y[
1965 6uGTR
19]5
REVENUE •
1986
NEVCNYE
lI...IT ... I
it 110. H1
:1. NY,IVI•
31, 1J.Md.
wl a Intt WptA.
615.6:5.
1101150.
759.950.
O br•a
130.000.
110,000.
315.000.
AM Al c9nf uNbtt•
91.500.
110.561
111.000.
NIF: F CMt
.p.
.p.
�O-
ADprop Pnor rear
Al, N
!11100.
TEAL KXVM'y
R.46l, l0.
'11191.636.
1 •s
a7
1965
9B6
lI...IT ... I
196! eYd9�t
CFpFndttue..•
[ue.ndtCUr.t
I u[wlrel
f 995.11[.
1 950.000.
SI.A51916.
Y tuu•Crvq {n F,
116.870.
110 965,
M 900.
!ot a•auntl
61.000.
61.000.
a6.5Y
F6tumnt
104.960.
91.195
nu•ptea
Al, N
!11100.
.uuD3l rtr
4.100.
1.100.
1 •s
4.1.1
11.110.
It 150.
11 9b.
•1NDloyront
.p-
-0-
.0.
p •rvl a Cyrnu
68.500.
95.000.
LV,'YID.
•�
nb•
19 loo
11.050
MSU^
11.100,
15 A•U,
YlFn trpt�n
6.500.
u.CY9°
S1.6 M.
41.600.
4,411.
51, Soo
L1y ury t.6
nateOMnp
1.000.
1.500.
51.000.
41.SOO.
51.000.
111:e wpF L v- • yR
S3.JSC.
49,000.
S1, 900•
MF•nt yuCwnt
1C.SSO.
11.100
11.6011,
pJ•4•
ar! M.t •119 [ap
60.11!.
10.110.
50.00p.
••A • M6•ar.'+tp.
61 010.
SO,000.
61,610.
NW
49,{1D
9,110.
9 49.190.
6. 0tnu
11.69J.
a In ur9n.6
11 900.
11.900.
19,040.
Ar.nw{ onf a In•t
119.410.
MOOD.
111.500.
tp ulltrn AJwcarl
1O.Or..
IS, 000.
10.000.
U lu ur
11.500.
11.500.
11.100.
•WCW 51rv+ala
I6.SOO.
14.011.
15.500.
A. Ma DuumnA
1.000.
1.5 W.
1,000.
b..ercn a vrot
1.0011
[C•�3ttu yY.
1M,J00.
13.001.
151000.
0. Otno 5• c•1
11.500.
%,$IT
11.500.
+I'•• \ll It9•a +•r'
)5•�'
11.SN.
50.500.
A. Guff D er•{
1J.W0.
14,000.
30. ooD.
e. :111•.11•,1 On.ul
15,3cc•
! co0.
li,noo.
Y lur1 aury v
S. AO.
t.OJO.
4,0OO,
J. unit t,br•
S. q0.
6.500.
[ Wu A.t wt 0
IQ 000.
IO.056•
-d.
snwl aIt • f r
SS A..
61.161.
11,150.
wglur uu. ns
61.861
1 9.`0,
54,156.
q [..1 INrvrrpnt•
Ilt.en0.
11•000.
46.000•
B.
11.000.
-'1.100
rtnm
1111800.
101.110.
11.ni.
JTAL "PIM: -1111!
11,111 110.
53.190.610.
$1.410.9:1.
a7
N
N
N
b
V
i
P
n
r�
r
0
M
X
m -
m
m o
Z �
� r
m ;
21
-1
n
s 2 soc,Dao
2,400,0'00
2,300,000
2,200,000
2,100,000
2,000,000
1,900,000
1,800,000
1,700,000
1,600,000
1. 500.000
1 400,000
1,300,000
1,200,000
1,100,000
1,000,000
900,000
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
IDTAL REVENUE: loommaxeasom■ DUES: N EXPENSES: +�•�..�+�
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — SOOMY OF DUES, JL'?ENUE AND EXPENDITCRE,S
C�)9
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
By Laws adopted October 1983 by the Annual Conference general asseadly
two-thirds (2/3) vote requires.
ARTICLE I% - DUES
Section 1. Wes
Tho annual Wes for Meaber Cities, and the annual service charge for
registered titles of the League on and after January 1, 1985 shall be as
follows:
1985 proposed 1986
For cities having a population of:
1 -
500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 22
5 23
501 -
500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
56
09
601 -
700
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
111
118
701 -
EGO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
123
130
801 -
900
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
145
154
901 -
11000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
178
189
11001 -
11250
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Z79
296
1,251 -
1,500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
346
367
11501 -
1,750
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
412
437
1,751 -
2,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
490
519
21001 -
2,250
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
524
555
2,251 -
24500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
579
614
2,501 -
2,750
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
613
650
2,751 -
3,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
668
708
3,001 -
4,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
746
791
4,OU1 -
5,000
. . . . . . . . . . .
890
943
5,001 -
7,500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,158
1,227
7,501 -
10,000
. . . . . . . . . . . .
1,336
1,416
10,001 -
15,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,614
1,711
15,001 -
20,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.859
1,971
20,001 -
25,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,327
2,467
25,001 -
30,OOU
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,794
2,962
30,OU1 -
40,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,440
3,636
40,OU1 -
50,OW
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,185
4,436
50,001 -
60,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,820
5.109
60.001 -
7U,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,29E
5.616
70.001 -
80.000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51565
51899
80.001 -
90,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,933
6.289
90.001 -
100.000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,500
61890
1W1001 -
125,OCJ
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,413
7.858
125,0)1 -
150.000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,159
8,648
150,001 -
200,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,272
9,828
20U,OU1 -
500.000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
465•
493•
over 500,000
. . . . . . . . . . . .
430*
456•
*per each
10,000 powilation
In no event shall the annual dues or service charge for any city exceed a
total amount of $50,000. No city's dues shall increase aura than $5,000 par
year.
For the purpose of this section, the population of each city shall be the
population determined by the State mnitroller in mounig the most recent
allocation to cities pursuant to the Vehicle Licenso Fee Law.
30
Section 2. Increase in Dues.
As may be warranted the Board of Directors by a two - thirds'
vote may increase the dues schedule after notice and
the cities (2�3)
. As provided in Section 1 up to ten jus0%) Cation to
psrcent(10�) cnnually
Section 3. Ratification by Regional Divisions.
Any dues increase passed by the Board of Directors as
for in Section 2 above shall be submitted to the regional
for ratification. Ratification by a majority pr °�lded
representing a mojoRat a regional divisions
the dues increase. Regional hdivisions cmust srespond ttoe the nsubmittalons of
Of the dues increase within 60 calendar days approval
by the Board of Directors. Regional divisions nottresponding within submittal 60
calendar days shall bs considered as having ratified the dues increase
31
CITY OF RANCHO CGCAbiONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 15, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director
BY: Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH ESRI FOR =GRAPHIC INFORMATION
Y M N UB
On December 18, 1985, the City Council approved a request to negotiate
contracts with Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) for the
design, acquisition, and implementation of a computerized Geographic
Information System and authorized a total budget of $167,000. At this
meeting, the Council is requested to approve the first of the three
required contracts. This contract, in the amount of S25,000, is for
system design, which includes aq analysis of user need„ design of data
base structure, and development of the system Implementation plan.
Implementation of the systga will begin as soon as the contract is
approved, with system design completion projected in approximately 90
days. During that time, the hardware and software contracts and the
custom programming /training contract will be finalized and brought as a
consent item to the Council for approval, in accordance with initial
agreements
R%1j41NDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached contract for
system es gn or a total amount of $25,000.
Respdftfu I ly fibmi tted,
Jack Lam, AICP
Community Development Director
JL:LW:ns
Attachment: System Design Contract
d
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH TNS_aTUTE
THIS AGREEMENT, is made this day of 14 , by end between
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, a muoieipal corporation (hereinafter referred to
as the 'CITY'), and ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH I1`STITUTE, a corporation
(hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT'), with reference to tl,e following:
WHEREAS, the CITY requires professional services in tho design of a
computerized Geographic Information System (CIS); and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has represented that it has the expertise necessary
to properly perform such services; and
WHEREAS, these parties desire to contract for certain specific services,
NOW THEREFORE, In consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
covenants and promises herein set forth, It in agreed between the parties
berate, as fellows:
ARTICLE 1 — SE!,VICES, PERSONNEL AND TIME SCHEDULE OF f.ONSULTA.NT
CONSULTANT shall perform all services specifi,l in this Agreement and in
Attachment 'A' which is attached to and by thin re[erence made a part of this
Agreement. Iu performing the specified services CONSULTANT shall follow
practices consistent with the highest professional and technical standards.
CONSULTANT will furnish personal services in the amount necessary to
complete promptly and effectively work specified by this Agreement. The
services specified by this Agreement shall be performed by CONSULTANT, or by
CONSULTANT'S associates and employees and under the peraonal supervision of
the project director, Nark Sorensen. All key project personnel of CONSULTANT
shall be subject to approval by the CITY, throughout the tem of this
Agreement.
The project director will be personally in charge of and personally
perform or supervise the project on behalf of CONSULTANT. Should the project
director be unable to complete his responsibility for any reason, CITY will
allow the CONSULTANT to replace the project director with a qualified person
whom CITY finds eatisfaetory as a substitute. If the CONSULTANT is unable to
find a satisfactory substitute within 30 days after written notice by City
that the current project direction is unacceptable 1s served, the CITY may
terminate the contract.
33
CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has no interest and that it will
not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any
tanner or degree with the performance of services required to he performed
under this Agreement. CONSULTANT further cove unts that in the performance of
said services, co person having any such Interest shall be employed.
CONSULTANT shall pay when due all social security, unemployment
compensation deductions and any other taxes or payroll deductions required by
law on behalf of its employees.
None of the services specified by this Agreement shall be subcontracted
by CONSULTANT without the proper written approval of CITY.
CONSULTANT shall have completed all services specified by this Agreement
by s and this Agreement shall expire on that date unless extended
by cooaent of the parties. Task performance will generally follow the
schedule as presented In Attachment 'B'.
ARTICLE 2 — DOCUMENTS
All materials developed, prepared or acquired by CONSULTANT during the
performance of the services specified by this Agreemant, Iocluding but not
limited to the following: all finished or unfinished docunsnts, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, capes photographs, and reports (hereinafter
collectively called 'documants'), shall become the property of CITY send shall
be delivered to CITY upon aceceptsnce of the final report or upon tc%mination
of this Agreement by either party. CITY shall not disclose or direct
CONSULTANT to disclose information related to methods or processes ant tied to
protection as trade secrets, unless so ordered by a court of coopetent
Jurisdiction or as otherwise any be required by law.
Prior to the proparetion of the final report by CONSULTANT, all der,"mnts
shall be submitted in preliminary or interim form to CITY for revLet and
approval according to the schedule as presented in Attachment 'B' CONSULTANT
understands and agrees that the final report must be accepted and approved by
CITY pslor to final payment under this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall within tan (10) business days promptly replace or
reinstitute all work rejected by CITY for failure to conform to this
Agreemear, without expense to CITY. In the event work is rejected by the
CITY, the CITY shall deuce in writing what work alments are unacceptable and
what revisions are required to make the work acecp
CITY'S satisfaction. table, and CONSULTANT shall
have ten (10) business days to effect further performance of services to
All cards, tapes, discs, other media, processes, reports, information,
and data of any kind that are made available by CITY or that become available
to CONSULTANT by virtue of this Agreement or the relationship created by this
Agreaent, shall forever be held in strictest confidence by CONTRACTOR, Its
officers, employeess sub — contractors, and agents. CONTRACTOR warrants that it
v
i
Sri
J -1691 —2 / L 12/85
T
shall make no disclosures or publications of cnv information or data of any
kind which is deemed by law to be confidential or which CITY specifies as
confidential. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, save harmless, and defend CITY its
elected officials, officers, employees, and agents including the payment by
CONTRACTOR of any and all legal costa and attorneys fees, from all liability
from loss, damages, or other injuries to persons or property in say manner
arising out of or incidental to disclosures or publications by CONTRACTOR, its
officers, employees, lub- coatractors of any information or data of any kind
which is deemed by law to be confidential or which CITY specifies as
confidential. There are no time limits governing the provisions of this
paragraph. CONSULTANT shall incorporate the provisions of this section in all
authorized subcontracrs.
ARTICLE 3 - SERVICES OF CITY
CITY agrees that its officers and employees will cooperate with
CONSULTANT in the performance of services under this Agrament and will be
available for consultation with CONSULTANT at such roasonsble times as do not
conflict with their other responsibilities.
CITY shall without charge furnish or make available for examination or
use by CONSULTANT, as It may request, any data, which CITY my have available
Including, but mot :Imtted to; (1) copies of previously prepared reports,
caps, plans, aurveys, records, and other documents pertinent to studies
specified by this Agreeneni; (2) copies of ordivancas, codes, regulations,
other dacuments and information related to the studies specified by this
Agreement; (3) capies of information prepared by CITY, or other consultants to
CITY, which are related to the studies specified by this Agreement. CITY
shall aid CONSULTANT in obtaining data from other public offices or agencies,
whenever, in the opinion of CITY'S representative, such data is necessary for
the completion of the studies specified by this Agreement. Etothing herein
shall require City to disclose confidential information not otherwise required
by CONSULTOR in performing Its service@ hereunder.
The services performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be
rev awed by CITY'S representative at appropriate intervals. The approval,
disapproval, or suggestions of CITY shall be reported in writing to CONSULTANT
within two weeks of receipt of requested information from CONSULTANT.
ARTICLE 4 - CRANCES TO SCOPE UP WORK
CITY my, at any time, by written order, mike changes within the general
scope of this Agreement in the services of work to be performed. If such
changes cause an increase or decrease in the cost of, or time required for
performance of CONSULTANT'S services under this Agreement, whether or not
changed by any order, an equitable adjustment shall be made in the fixed fee
and this Agreement shall be mcdific3 in writing accordingly. Any claim of
CONSULTANT for adjustment under this Article mast be asserted in writing
within 20 days after receipt by CONSULTANT of the written order for change.
J -1691 -3- 2's- 12/85
No services for which an additional compensation will be charged by
CONSULTANT shall be furnlched without the prior written authorization of CITY.
ARTICLE 5 - COMPENSATION, INVOICES A.YO PROGRESS REPORTS
CITY will pay CONSULTANT a fixed lee of $25,000 in accordance with the
payment schedule referred to below.
CONSULTANT shall prepare in writing and submit monthly to CITY in
writing, Invoices showing requested compensation for work In accordance with
the schedule as specified in Attachment 'R'. The maximum amount which
CONSULTANT may be paid for each task, unless otherwise provided by written
authorization from CITY, shall be as specified in Attechment 'C .
The CITY shall make payment to CONSULTANT for the allowable costs
invoiced no later than 30 days after receipt and approval of each invoice by
CITY.
CONSULTANT shall provide CITY cacti ,nth during the entire ten of this
Agreement, a written summary report of progress on the services being
performed under this Agreement. Such reports shall include the cumulative
percentage of completion of the overall project and =Jot tasks completed
thereunder, identification of any delaying factors, a brief statement of
finaings to the date of reporting and such other information as may be
required by CITY.
ARTICLE 6 - INSURANCE
INDEMNITY. CONSULTANT shall hold free and harmless, defend, and
Indemnify CITY, Stv elected officials, officers, employacs, and agents against
all 10239 damage, expense, and liability arising out of, or In any way
connected with, the installation, supplying, Inspection, testing, designating,
Instruction, or other work performed by CONSULTANT, its officers, employees,
agents or representatives, excepting only cuch injuries or damages as may be
caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY CONSULTANT
shall, on CITY'S request, defend against any Suit asserting a claim covered by
this indemnity. Notwithstanding CONSULTAMT'S duty to dafond CITY as herein
provided, CONSULTANT shall pay all costs that may be Incurred by CITY in
enforcing these indemnity provisions, including actual attorney's fees.
INSURANCE. CONSULTANT shall not cocence work under this Agreezent until
it has obtained all insurance referred to in the RPP and required hereunder in
a company or companies acceptable to CITY, nor shall CONSULTANT alloy any
subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all Insurance required
of the subcontractor has been obtained. The CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement the following policies
of insurance:
J -1691 -4- 3 / 12/$5
A. Coapemeation Insurance. Before beginning work. CONSULTANT shall
furnish to CITI a sedate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full
compensation insurance for all persons whom it my employ directly or through
subcontrnetorP In carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with
the laws of the State of California. Such Insurance shall be maintained to
full force and effect during the period covered by this Agreement.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the
California Labor Code, every eae?e7er shall secure the payment of compensation
to his employees. CONSULTANT, prior to comencing work, shall alga and file
with CITY a certificate as follows:
'I as aware of the vrovislons of Section 3700 of the California
Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for
workers' compensation or to undertake self- inuursoca in accordance with the
provisions of that Cods, and I will comply with such provisions before
comencing the parfomsnce of the work of this Agreement.
B. Throughout the term of this Agreement. At CONSULTANT'S sole coat
and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep at cause to be kept in full force and
effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad
forms gemeral public liability and automobile insurance against claim and
liability for parsonal Injury, death, or property damage arising from
CONSULTANT'S activities In connection with this A)reament, providing
protection of at least One Killiom Dollars ($1,000,000) for bodily injury or
death to nay one parson or for .my one accident or occurrence and at laser One
Killion Dollars ($1000,000) for property damage. All lasuramce required by
this Agreement shall mme CITE, Its elected officials, officers, employees,
and agents as additional insureds and shall be carried only in rovponsible
Insurance companies licensed to do business In the State of California. All
such policies shall contain language to the effect that (1) the Insurer waives
the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY'S agents and repr.nemtativae,
(2) the policies are primary and non - contributing with any insurance that my
be carried by CITY, and (3) they cannot be cancelled or notarially changed
except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by the insurer to CITY.
CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all required policies promptly
upon receipt Of them, or certificates evidencing the Insurance, prior to
eaaaneenent of its performatce as herein required. CONSULTANT my effect for
Its own account Insurance not required under this Agreement.
ARTICLE 7 - SUSPENSION
CITY my suspend performance by CONSULTANT under this Agreement for such
period of tim as CITY in its sole discretion my proscribe by providing
written notice to CONSULTANT at least ten (10) working days prior to the date
on which CITY wishes to ouspead. CONSULTANT shall not perform further work
under thin Agreement after the effective date of suspension until receipt of
written notice from CITY to resume performance. The due dates sat forth in
the time schedule prepared under Article 1 and Attachment 'B' of this
J -1691 -5- 37
12 /BS
ACroemnt shall be extended by the pariod(s) of any suspensions) ordered by
CITY.
ARTICLE 8 - TERMINATION
This Agreement shall continue in force until completion of all services
required of CONSULTANT unless sooner terminated by CITY or CONSULTANT pursuant
to the provisions of this Article or any other provision of thin Agreement
which allow% termination.
This Agreement may be terminated In whole or in part in writing by either
party in the event the other party falls to fulfill its obligations under this
Agreement which occurs through no fault of the terminating party; provided,
that no such termination may be effected unless the other party is given (1)
not less than five (S) days written notice of intent to terminate and (2) on
opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination.
This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by CITY
for its convenience, provided that no such termination my be effected unless
CONSULTANT is given (1) not leas than ten (10) working days written notice of
Intent to terminate and (2) an opportunity for consultation with CITY prior to
termination.
If termination is affected by CITY, CITY will pay CONSULTANT that portion
of the fixed fee which has been earned as of the last date of aervicas being
performed by CONSULTANT, leas all previous payments. Any such payment due to
CONSULTANT at the time specified above my be adjusted to the extent of any
additional costs incurred by CITY by reason of CONSULTANT'S default.
CONSULTANT shall not be relieved r.f liability to CITY for damage sustained due
to CONSULTANT'S breach and CITY may withhold any payments to CONSULTANT until
such time as the exact amount of damage due CITY from CONSULTANT is
determined.
Upon receipt of a notice of termination pursuant to paragraphs above,
CONSULTANT shall (1) promptly discontinue all services affected (unles+ the
notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or otherwise make available , CITY
all finished or unflnlsbed documents and all information which have been
accumulated, developed or prepare. by CONSULTANT in performing services under
this Agreement.
Upon any termination of this Agreement, CITY my take over the work and
prosecute the once to completion by agreement with another party or otherwise.
ARTICLE 9 - REMEDIES
It !s mutually .greed that all claims, counterclaim, disputes and other
matters in gmstior between the CITY .nd CONSULTANT arising out of or relating
to this Agreement or the breach thereof will be decided by negotiation between
the two parties. In the event that the CITY and CONSULTANT "meet agree upon
an equitable settlement through negotiation, such claims, counterclaim,
4-1691 -6- 3 4? 12/85
disputes or other mutters will be determined by a court of competent
Jurisdictinn within the State of Califotmia
ARTICLE 10 - RECORDS. ACCESS, AUDIT
CONSULTANT shall maintain records of parformance under this Agroment and
make these records available for inspection and audit by CITY.
Audits conducted pursuant to this Artlele shall be in accordance with
grnarally accepted auditing standards and established procedure and guidelines
of the reviewing or auditing agency.
Records maintained under terms of thin Article above shall ba maintained
and made available during performance of services under this Agreement and
until three years from data of final payment. In addition, those record•
which relate to any 'dispute' appeal, litigation or the settlement of claims
arising v_t of such performance, or coats of items to which an audit exception
has been . &ken, shall be maintained and made available until three years after
the date of resolutioa of such appeal, litigation, claim or exception.
ARTICLE 11 - COVENANT AGAINST - ONTINGENT FEES
CONSULTANT warrants that no person or company has bean employed or
retained to solicit or secure this Agreement upon on agreement or
understanding for a [omission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee; nor
has CONSULTANT paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation,
Individual or firm any fee, commission, contribution, donation, percentage,
gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from award „f
this Agreement. For any breach or violation of this provision, CITY shall
have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability, or, at its
discretion, to deduct from the contract price, or Otherwise recover, the full
amount of such foe, commission, percentage, gift or consideration and any
other damages.
ARTICLE 12 - FORCE NAIEURE
Neither party shall be considered in default in the performance of its
obligations hereunder, or any of them, to the extent that performance of such
obligations, or any of than, is prevented or delayed by any cause, existing or
future, which is beyond the reasonable control of such party. Any delays
beyond the control of either party shall automatically extend the time
schedules as set forth in this Agroement by period of such delays. However,
CITY shall not be required under any circumstances to take payment for
services not received by CITY.
J -1691 -7- 3Q 12/85
ARTICLE 13 - NON - DISCRIMINATION
CONSULTANT will mot discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of race, color, religion, sax, age or national origin.
LVNSULTANI shall take affireutiva action to ensure that applicants are
emplo;.ed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to
race, color, religion, sex, ago or national origin. CONSULTANT agrees to post
in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants, employment
notices setting forth the provisions of this non - discrimination clause.
CONSULTANT will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by
or on behalf of CONSULTANT state that all qualified applicants will receive
consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age
or national origin, unless such application is made by the party having
ownership of such document by virtue of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 14 - COPYRIGHTS AND RIGHTS IN DATA
As act forth in Article 3, all documents prepared or acquired by
CONSULTANT in performing servfees under this Agreement are subject to the
ownership rights of CITY, including the right to use, duplicate and disclose,
such reports, etc., in whole or' in part, in any manner for any purpose
whatsoever, and to have attars to do so. No document developed, prepared or
acquired In whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an
application for copyright or patent by or on behalf of CITY or CONSULTANT,
unless such application is made by the party having ownership of s .h document
by virtue of this Agreement.
Patent, Trademark, Copyright Infringement
CONSULTANT hereby expressly warrants that it has sole proprietary
Interest to and to any and all software it shall supply to CITY under this
Agreement, excepting such software for which a license or other permissions
has been obtained and terms of such license or permission have been fully
disclosed to CITY In writing. CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and save
harmless CITY and its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents
against all cleans and any and all Judgments, costs, damages, and expenses
which may be awarded In any suit, action, or proceeding brought for
infringement or alleged infringement of a patent, trademark, copyright, or
other proprietary Interest by a court of cnmpetent Jurisdiction, arising out
of the use of the materials, software, and /or other equipment furnished
hereunder for the purposes herein Intended. If any suit or suits for the
iafrfagenant of a patent, trademark, copyright, or other proprietary Interest
Is lastituted an above specified due to the use of said software, matarials,
or other equipment furnished pursuant to this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall
provire written notification within thirty (30) days of actual notice received
by CONSULTANT as to any such suit or suits and CONSULTANT shall immediately
assume the CITY'S defence of such suit or suits and all expenses incidental to
the defense thereof, including attorney's fees. CITY shall cooperate In good
faith In its own defense; however, unless CITY shows good cause so as to
7 -1691 -8- / D 12/85
provide otherwise, CONSULTANT shall have control of such defense and CITY
shall be kept fully informed as to the progress of s=h litigation.
If CONSULTANT In enjoined from providing CITY with any of the
software or other materials required under thin Agreement, such injunction, as
of the effective date thereof shall be deemed grounds for terminatioT th,s
Agreement by CITY. However, CONSULTANT may offer alternative soltwa: or
other materials as required under this Agreement, subject to all conditions,
provisions, and specifications of this Agreement and all attachments hereto.
If, in CITY'S sole discretion, said alternative software or materials perform
In a manner satisfactory to CITY, CONSULTANT shall be relieved from liability
for failing to provide the specific software module or other material
originally purchased under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall bear all costs
necessary to purchase, transport, install, and test such s.•.tware or materlQs
to CITY'S satisfaction.
Should CONSULTANT refuse or fail, within fourteen (16) days after
receipt of written notice by CITY to commence providing alternative software
or materials acceptable to CITY, in CITY'S sole discretion, such refusal or
failure is hereby deemed to be grounds for immediate termination of this
Agreement and CITY shall have the right to execute on CONSULTANT'S performance
bond required hereunder, and thereby secure &Itsruattva performance.
ARTICLE 15 - HISCELLANEOUS
California law shall govern the Interpretation of this Agreement.
Any attempt by CONSULTANT to assign or otherwise transfer any interest in
this Agreement, without the prior written consent of CITY, shall be void;
provided, hovevar, that claims for compensation due or to become due to
CONSULTA1T from CITY under this Agreement may be assigned without such
approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished
promptly to the CITY.
In performing cervices under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall observe and
&%ide by all applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, er other rules of the
W ted States, of the State of California, of any political subdivision
th•voof, or of any other duly constituted public authority or agency.
CONSULTANT shall be liable for any and all incidental coats, including, but
not limited to, costs of travel, permits required, Inspections or other
approvals.
3-1691 -9- q1 12/85
Any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be domed to
have been given when received by the party to whom it is directed by personal
service, hand delivery or United States Nail Delivery as follows:
TO CITY: City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
TO CONSULTANT: ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTPNS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
380 New York Street
Redlands, CA 92373
Either party may change Sts representative or address above by written notice
to the other.
Any change or modification of this Agreement other than a change under
Article V (Changes to Scope of Work) shall to made only upon written consent
of both parties.
All work performed under this contract shall be in compliance with
Executive Order 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity,' as mended by
Executive Order 11375, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations
(41 CPR Part 60).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the first day above written.
ESRI SYST131S. INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOVCA
'CONTRACTOR' 'CLIENT'
Da
Date
J -1691 -10- / /�, 12/85
ATIAOHMEHr A
Proposed Work Program
Proposed Work Program
Hethodology
For over a decade, ESRI has employed, adapted .ad fine -tuned a
methodology for analysing user needs and requirements and developing
conceptual deeigns for geographic information systems. ESRI has been
successful id designing geographic information systems by adhering to this
formalized design methodology. Our clients have been able to use the designs
to effectively guide the creation anA use of their system. From inirlal
lople:entation through maturity, these systems have effectively served our
clients needs for geographically- referenced data management and analysis. We
believe this success results in part from the thorough and orderly analysis
our methodology brings to tha system conceptual design process.
The methodology typically used by ESRI is related to the SPEC.RQ4
approach. It commences with a thorough examination of the operations,
functions, and organizational /institutional structures and relationships
which support client agency activitiez. Based upon this analysis, system
j requirements may be identified. Broadly defined, these system requirements
I includes client agency task or process needs; the data base elemental Stems,
t
and their interactions, as needed to fulfill the identified client tasks; the
4 basic software procedures necessary for supporting there processes; the types
r.
�'• and specifications of hardware components necessary for performing the tasks
V or processes; and the organizational structure needed to operate and support
J -1691 -11- / / 3 12/85
the system. Using this requirnent'a description, the hardware, software and
data base components for system development may be rationally identified and
the appropriate organizational structure for system operation deflned. Once
these system cocponents are understood and documented. a strategy and work
program for system development mod implementation can be prepared.
Task Descriptions
The methodology we propose for preparing a conceptual design and
implementation program for the City of Rancho Cucamonga'a CIS will require
several specific tasks. Each is important for the creation of a geographic
Information system which will benefit and be used by the various departments
and orginizatlons that it is designed to serve. The specific tasks to be
cr rried out are:
1. Conduct an introductory seminar about CIS technology
2. Identify and analyze user needs
3. Survey and ovnluste existing data which is available for meeting
these needs
6. Design the geographic data bate structure
S. Design the geographic information system
6. Develop an implementation plan
Each of these tasks is described below.
Task 1 - Conduct an Introductory Seminar
As the initial tasks ESRI will conduct a seminar to introduce department
and city managers to CIS technology and the conceptual design process. If
desired by the City, the seminar will be structured as two sessions. The
J -1691 -12- / //[ 12/83
first Session w111 focus on explaining GIS tachnology and the role it can
Play in city government. Among the topics to be addressed will bet
- Basic concepts of geographic information management.
- The potential benefits to the City of increased efficiency In
department operations and public services which can revult from the
Introduction of geographic information management technology.
- The range of capabilities of state -of -the -art technology in
geographic information managment, including geographic data
manipulation, analysis, networking and graphics techniques, data base
concepts and automated mapping and drafting procedures.
- A brief description of the conceptual design methodology which will
be undertaken during the project, including demands on City staff and
management -level personnel to provide time for Interview preparation
and participation, as vcll as support in data retrieval.
The second session will focus on the conceptual design project in greater
depth. The methods ESRI will use for data collection, Interviewing, data
analysis and conceptual design development will be Introduced and discueded.
The session will also provide department managers an opportunity to consldur
appropriate staff to participate In the Interview process.
After the session Is completed, the City will be responsible for
scheduling of interviews with Input m ESRI, as needed. It will also bn
Important for the City to brief the Interviewees about the goals of the
conceptual design project, the purpose of the interviews, the data which ESRI
wishes to obtain, ate.
J -1691 -13- C 12/05
.J
Task 2 - Identify and Analyze User Needs
In this task, the geographic Information and analysis requirements of the
GIS user agencies and departments In the City of Aancho Cucamonga will be
dentified. These department and agencies are axpected to Include Planning,
nginearing, Building and Safety, Police, Administration, Community
Development, Redevelopment, and Community Services. By creating a clear
definition of the potential uses of the GIS, the scope and configuration of
the system will begin to emerge.
To begin this task, available documentation on the relevant functions or
respoosib.litles of the specified agencies and departments will be reviewed.
Documentation may include, for example, procedures and operations manuals,
organizational charts and departmental program statements. Once this
background review is completed, consultations with department and agency
management will be held to review and refine the list developed by the City
of persons to be interviewed. This list will be reviewed carefully to ensure
a complete and balanced assessment of user needs, as well as to avoid any
duplication of effort.
Extensive interviews of staff within the identified user agencies and
departments will then be performed. These Interviews will focus on the tasks
performed by and responsibilities of the tsars for collection, maintenance
and provision of geographically- reference! information. Focus will be on the
types of geographically - related decisions made by each agency and department
and the range of geographic data used to support these decisions. These
interviews will also provide an inventory of the information and analysis
techniques which will be required within the geographic informatics system,
J -1691 -14- 160 12/85
and the necessary levels of accuracy and data resolution to suppoct agency
and departmental responsibilities.
The interviews will be held Inf,tmally to create a relaxed enviromsent
for option information sharing. User needs for the CIS will be summarized
for each agency and department and submitted to the latervlewees for comment.
Copies of user needs documentation with revision, arlaing from this ^ity
review will later be included in the final conceptual design document.
Task 3 - Evaluate Existing Data
Concurrent with the Interviews in Task 2, samples of existing data which
may satisfy the geographic information and analysis needs of prospective
users of the CIS will be collected. Data to be collected are expected to
Include maps, books, reports, statistical and tabular data listings, aerial
photography and related documents. Map and tabular data currently automated
or expected to be automated in the future will also bn inventoried In this
task. The data samples will be collected by ESRI during lntacviews described
In Task 2 so that City staff can provide a thorough explanation of the
origin, quality and characteristics of each data type.
Following the interviawa, each sample data source collected will be
reviewed and evaluated to determine Its usefulness and appropriateness for
inclusion in the CIS. The evaluation will consider factors such as
geographic coverage of data iteu, availability, iecuracy, methods of
collection and redundancy with respect to similar data from other agencies,
departments or other sources. Formate, acquisition dates, ease of
interpretation for translation, reformatting and systm input costs, and ease
of maintenance /updating will also be assessed. To the extant possible,
1 -1691 -15- q 7 12/85
qualitstive estimates of information value, costs and accessibility will also
be made. A technical evaluation of each data source will be perfoined, in
terms of the criteria listed above, to assess suitability for inclusion in
the comprehensive geographic information system.
At the conclusion of this task a data inventory will bn prepared which
provides an evaluation and reference tool for the geographic information used
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Within this inventory, each data item
will be described la narrative, and a chart outlining its characteristics
will be prepared. The data item in the inventory will be organized in terms
of the •pe of geographic area to which they pertain, such as parcels,
streets, utilities, adminiatrative areas, etc.
Task 4 - Prepare Caneeptual Desixa of the Geotraphic Data gas
This task will involve the specification of a conceptual data base
structure for the Rancho Cucamonga geographic information system. It will be
based upon the information needs of users identified in Task 20 and the
assessment of existing and future data completed in Task 1. The conceptual
design will address the following factors:
. Nothods for data collection and automation
General categories of data elements
Data base organization and format specifications for cartographic and
tabular data Item
• Necessary frequency of data updates
• Appropriate 'key' item for linking related file& of data
• Qw lity and source of data to be included.
J -1691 -16- (/9 12/85
An Important objective for this comceptual data base design is to
structure a single data base which has been Integrated to serve the needs of
rote than one agency, department or organization. RL•ewver possible, the
data bans will be designed to serve multiple warm, thereby augmenting the
efficiency, practicality and cost - effectiveness of the data base aid
eliminating unnecessary data redundancy.
A technique we have used successfully and Intend to use for the data base
design for Rancho Cucamonga as well, is to structure the data base In terms
of a conceptual data modal. figure 1 Illustrates a generic, municipal data
model which hot evolved through the many conceptual design studies we have
performed and which we will use as a starting point In the design of the
Rancho Cucamonga geographic data bass.
for data base design, procedures for Including existing automated data In
the CIS and automating data now maintained eanually will used to be
considered. Recommended procedure% will be developed as part of the
conceptual design and included In the final report.
Also, the ability to update data which is stored in the CIS will be
extremely Important. Therefore, as part of the conceptual dar .use design,
recommendations will be developed as well regarding methods for storing data
ffor ease of retrieval and updating as Information becomes subject to change.
k To the extent possible these procedures will attempt to make data updating a
function of capturing the new data as part of the orfgl -.al transaction (e.g.,
issuing a building permit mending a plan).
J -1691 -17- q 9 12 /83
FIGURE I
Sods
Base Mfe
PPaef
GRAPHIC
RELATION
(OVERLAY)
Roma - --
I
TOPOLOGICAL RELATION
(OVERLAY)
Partial
TibJar
Gan
Area TaeWaa S
Jnr.m• rr, l-
JJa
Sawara
Jrr ••• r
Parcel M"
STANDARD
REL TION
Sal
Z
ADDRESS
RELATION
GBP
II )11
f )!J
Aran Pnyyana
PDYpeNiaaen
So
TOPOLOGICAL RELATION
(OVERLAY)
Naerern TaowabW,
frrr r.f-
Task S - Design Geographic Information System
The components for an operational geographic information system for
Rancho Cucamonga in addition to the data base will be specified in Task S.
The data base designed in Task 4 represents the central component of the CIS
design. The four additional components to be considered during this task
are:
1) Administration of the CIS
2) Institutional arrangements for use and support of the system
3) Software required to operate the system
4) Hardware needed for system operation.
The design of these components will be based on the information obtained
In Tasks 1. 3 and 4. as wall as considerable dtacusaion with department and
agency management and data processing staff. Tha considerations to be
addressed as part of each of these components are described below.
Svetm Hnageuent
This effort will datermlne how and by whom the system will be managed
(in particular, which agencies and departments and which people within
the agencies and departments will be responsible). Considerable insight
frgm department and agency management will be necesaa•y to formulate the
management concept.
Another important part of this system management task will be to
Identify the functions, staff resources and other resources needed to
manage, maintain and operate the geographic information system on an
ongoing basis. This tank will entail the apncification of a conceptual
Y �
program for addressing several factors, to include: a) updating the data
r
C
n
J -1691 -18- C'/ 12/85
v �J
files; b) expanding the geographic coverage or other aspects of the data
base as needed for use by additional programs or agencies; c)
coordination among users; d) staffing requirements; and e) assessment of
priorities for system implementation.
Institutional_ Arrangements
Institr tonal arrangements include the types of axreements and
coordl:,atlan mechanism which must be made between the various agencies
and departments which may develop or utilize data associated with the
geographic Information system. Our experience had above that once a
geographic information system Is established, there is frequently
unexpected demand for information from prospective users. Relationships
among, system users are seldom pra- planned. To assure compatible working
relationships among users. this task will include the preparation of a
plan for coordination among the user otganizations for sharing
Information as well as protecting that Information which is considered
privileged.
Software Requirements
Based upon the findings of Tasks 2, 3 and 4, software requirements
will be specified for use in various CIS applications. This
specification will address factors of information automttion storage,
analysis and display functions to be performed. At a minicum, it is
expected that the software will be requiredt to store points, lines and
polygons as x,y coordinates; to perform overlay, compaaito and other map
manipulations; and to autyot thi& geographic data in a variety of display
formats.
r
+ J -1691 -19- Sc;x 12/83
Hardware teauiremants
The types of hardware resources needed within the user departments
for operation of the geographic information system will be specified
during thin task. Additional hardware required to support tll system
usav will be considered carefully to ensure compatibility both with
existing hardware and long -range information system development programs
of the City.
In selecting the appropriate types of hardware to meet identified
department needs, the following factors will be considered:
- functionality of system software /hardvara _ : all envisioned
applications
- availability of the hardware, including time required for delivery
- reliability, probable down -time, and ease of repair
- ave :lability of service
- compatibility with existing City hardware and software
- flexibility to support future changes In the system.
Hardware and software requirements which are Identified will be
compared against turnkey system componento to be Implemented in Phases
One and Two and recommendations developed for future enhancements to the
City's basic system, if necessary.
Task 6 - Develop an Implementation Plan
Task 6 will involve developing an implementation plan for executing all
of the steps in CIS development Tho plan will cover tasks to be performed;
scheduling end phasing of system implementation; cost for hardware, software
and date base creation; and project management responsibilities. The plan
J -1691 -20- S? 12/85
will be designed to some as a tool for the City to use in initially
organizing to begin CIS development and for directing ongoing development and
management of the system. The completion of products from Tasks 2 through 5
to the conceptual design study will provide a detailed reference for
structuring the components of a workable and sensitive implementation
program
The product of Task 6 will be a guidebook for CIS implementation,
Including organizational and individual staff roles, functions, timoframes,
and resources. This guidebook will contain work breakdown charts, manpower
scheduting, overall costs, and related management tools for oversight and
direction of the project
It will be Important for department and city sanagement and data
processing staff to particlp+te setively in the development of chIS
inplesentat toi plan to ensure that it to piepared In a "n"it Alch is
sm.altive to currant conditions and daources Development of the
iaplaamitaticn plan will provide a Unique oppott ratty to focus and
interrelai. I t the technlgal and ur11nlaljtlmt4l parts of the program,
allowing for aplete !- tegratioe of the vnrieus departmental activities
Dali.,itablaa
The foltovleg products or services will be provided for each of the
project tuts
task t - Inuaduatatj elsslP�r
A Seminar an geographic Informs tlun system technology will be conducted
lot ildgallbssnt staff Materials will be provided describing the conceptual
design ptalect, the user interview process and Its Scale, the data which mat
r T
J -1691 2l- J`-/ / 12/85
be obtained from Interviews, and @=plea of the forms which will be used to
report user nands findings.
Tack 2 - Identify Needs
A writing report will be prepared describing for each department or
agency the findings from the review of esterfals and interviews. The report
will is submitted to the City for review and cooent and later used in
preparing the conceptual design for the system. Included in the report will
be: 1) geographically - related tasks performed by the agencies and
departoent3; 2) data requirements for performance of tasks; 3) generic
software requirements for performance of tasks; 4) hardware needs as
Indicated by the nature of the tasks and software requirements; and 5)
Interaction between and among agency and'departments in performance of
geographically- related tasks.
Task 3 - Evaluate Existing Data
A working report will be submitted describing the existing data sources
reviewed for possible use to building the CIS data base. The report will
describe: 1) characteristics and content of the data sources which may
affect their suitability for use in the data base; 2) suitability of
different sources for use in the data base; 3) common basemnps and thematic
mapc used by agencies and departments; and 4) the data base currently
maintained In each department.
Task 4 - Conceptual Geographic Data Base Design
A conceptual design doc =ent will be prepared including eufflcient
diagram and tables to identify the data base format including relationships
between and among automated files. A working report w)11 also be prepared
J -1691 -22- S 12/85
describing appropriate automation methods and maintenance methods for the
different data types. Both the design document and the working report will
be submitted to the City for comment. Required revisions will be
Incorporated in the final conceptual design document.
Task 5 - System Conceptual Desl$m
A working report will be prepared describing: 1) the hardware
requirements for the CIS including CPU, disks storage and peripheral devices
for the user departments and agencies; 2) generic software requirement@ for
the overall system and specific agencies and departments; and )) system
management and operation structure. The report will be submitted to the City
for review. Comments will be included in the final conceptual design
document.
Task 6 - Implementation Plan
A report will be prepared describing a phased work program and schedule
for CIS implenentation. The report will include task description, a diagram
of task flow and relationships, an overall schedule diagram, estimates of
manpower, costa and outside services required for system implementation, and
responsibilities for task toplementation.
The repurts from each task will be combined with the implementation plan
and submitted as a draft CIS conceptual design report for City review.
Comments received from the City will be incorporated in the document to
produce a final CIS conceptual deaigu.
J -1641 -23- S� 12/85
ATTACHMENT B
Project Schedule
Protect Schedule
As preaeatly envisioned, the proposed project will take approminately
three and one -half (3 1/2) conchs to cmoplete. The task schedules with
ticefraoes for sequential completion are i:dlcated In the chart below.
1 3 4 S
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Task 1
Task
Task 3
Task 4
Task S
Task 6 a as
*Draft Report **Final Report
Conceptual Dusign Study Project Schedule
J -169i -24- S-7
12/65
W
1
J -1590 6-9 12/85
ATTACHMENT C
Protect cost"
Project Costs
he propuan total cost for
thousand dollars ($25,000). labor
the conceptual
design study is
tventy -five
broken down as folloves
and expense
costs Eor each
task can be
Labor
Expenses
Total
Task I - Introductory Sminar
$ 1,660
$ 50
$ 1,710
Task 2 - User Needs
7,800
300
8,100
Task 3 - Data Evaluation
2,500
—
2,500
Task 0 - Data Base Design
4,500
50
4,550
Task 5 - System Design
4,000
50
4,050
Tack 6 - toplanentation Plan
3,900
t90
4,090
TOTAL
$14,360
$640
$25,000
J -1590 6-9 12/85
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 15, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Otto Kroutll, Senior Planner
z l �
C J
` A
Z
SUBJECT: 1INOR REVISIONS TO THE 1985 -1988 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAI
wn
The three year Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) for federal fiscal years 1985 •o
1989 was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Cit, Council in November, 1985.
After City Council approval, the HAP was submitted to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for review and approval. This is required
of all Black Grant recipients. However, before approving the HAP, HUD has
requested minor changes.
HUD requested that the proportions of different household types to receive
rental subsidies reflect the actual percentages of household types in need
within the City. This change does not, however, change the total number of
lower income households to receive rental subsidies (line 19, column S). The
total number of lower income households to receive rental subsidies remains at
150
is shown on Part IIneo21. Thentotalthat
housnholdseto bebassisted with HUD resources (column W; III
was S5. According to HUD, this number must be at least 3 percent of the total
rental subsidy lower hso Table i 3Consequently he number oouseho dstobeassist d by HUDresourcesnustbe
at least 73 t2,436 X .03 • 73).
The attached HAP has been revised accordingly.
RtECC24POATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the changes to
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:OK:ko
Attachment: Revised HAP
59
r
PART 11 THREE YCAR GOAL
TABLE I -UNITS TO UE ASSISTFp
[NAORIiAT10N N[w --__
OP C YV [nStON 10
5TN(pylp l.^nT; CON9TRL•CTION UNITS
NOM[
ND WO
e —���• i INIROVIL•[N
(UNITS EXPECTED TO ASSIST LOWER INCOME HOUSCHOLOS)
TABLE 11 - LOWER INCOIJE NOIISENOLOS U
TO RECEIVE AENTALSU65101E5
-- T __ ELOCnLYALL FALIILY URGI GAMILY TOTA J L
OlW to lle Atutt[0 -- -' 0 .• ___n "• erceI�l 14, " -,�� ._._ 23 __ -._ 150 y TABLE III - 2. IS.G »-
GOALSFOgHUDRESOURCES. SUBJECT TO LOCAL REVIFIy AND COMMENT
[LD[RLY $MALL ihullY — -`
LA IGC FAYILV TOTAL
jl Mo, <rnoVl 10 W AtNnN T
9e ,0 14 �73
T -- MOUSING TYPE PIIEFCRENCE I:IaAPnw»NNnAer n•UmB L�at w• /1 DP gccn: Ml
.J hew —.... - � n[NLn _.__ "'
_CTISTIt G
9 A K1rlln OOe dtM aPPlrianh »lnn ronYine Srala73 -�_ '� =- 73— _-- -•- -_—
OvhryTg9mryCrOPOY19Wlh t ry ldCtc
PART III GCHEOAL LOCATIONS
_ (attuned)
7P AlNen man wnrdynp VU P/nwl lWhO/IT 01 - --
PraPalnf asyrrnY AOVUl1p,
a�wP — nC [.1CUf
6 nL0 )091 1111
• i MOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
- a
° ^A «T'ruueen
f[vStG
1_
fl
y-
M
C-
0 G �-
0
5
5
rAOaA, O. tyA»r 1, 1785 TD. Sc rt. T0, 19AR
T-
NU ^APPROVAL
CaLAT OI [VOUyA,On
••.�Dflnnal
❑RplNdn ❑A(nrndTrnl
[igINNb OIAUNO/m001 /t41J
PART f - MOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Oan/
TABLE 1 - HOUSINGSTOCKCONOITIONS
STALOMD UNITS
SUOST AR
MIOD UNITS
9UOSTAN0AItO UNITS SUITAOL[FOR
TENURE
ACHAI
TY /[ OCCVPIIO
VACANT
OCCVPI(C
VACANT
OCCC/n COYhITS
- -�
UNITF
UNIT:
UNIT(
VhIt9
VACANT
--
TOIY
Lever l•tamP
UNITS
O
—
TABLE II - RENTAL SUBSIDY NEEDS OF LONER !NCOtAE
_1
HOUSEHOLDS
ELOCRL =- SLIAIL PAUILY [ _URG6 rAWLY
7AL
TOTAL
PART 11 THREE YCAR GOAL
TABLE I -UNITS TO UE ASSISTFp
[NAORIiAT10N N[w --__
OP C YV [nStON 10
5TN(pylp l.^nT; CON9TRL•CTION UNITS
NOM[
ND WO
e —���• i INIROVIL•[N
(UNITS EXPECTED TO ASSIST LOWER INCOME HOUSCHOLOS)
TABLE 11 - LOWER INCOIJE NOIISENOLOS U
TO RECEIVE AENTALSU65101E5
-- T __ ELOCnLYALL FALIILY URGI GAMILY TOTA J L
OlW to lle Atutt[0 -- -' 0 .• ___n "• erceI�l 14, " -,�� ._._ 23 __ -._ 150 y TABLE III - 2. IS.G »-
GOALSFOgHUDRESOURCES. SUBJECT TO LOCAL REVIFIy AND COMMENT
[LD[RLY $MALL ihullY — -`
LA IGC FAYILV TOTAL
jl Mo, <rnoVl 10 W AtNnN T
9e ,0 14 �73
T -- MOUSING TYPE PIIEFCRENCE I:IaAPnw»NNnAer n•UmB L�at w• /1 DP gccn: Ml
.J hew —.... - � n[NLn _.__ "'
_CTISTIt G
9 A K1rlln OOe dtM aPPlrianh »lnn ronYine Srala73 -�_ '� =- 73— _-- -•- -_—
OvhryTg9mryCrOPOY19Wlh t ry ldCtc
PART III GCHEOAL LOCATIONS
_ (attuned)
7P AlNen man wnrdynp VU P/nwl lWhO/IT 01 - --
PraPalnf asyrrnY AOVUl1p,
a�wP — nC [.1CUf
6 nL0 )091 1111
C
CI
r.
CCu
(I
n
u'
i Q
C] 6
u. w
�o U
Z
z z rn
�S Z
� W N
7
0
s
v f
J
o
0
f 1
O
aj
O ff
O
N
O
O
O N
Y ^
C
C
a Y o
E fj
N
_y
5 �
.
�
N
O O
G
tl
[O❑ E�
S
N P N N
r r
_]E
��1
QQv o
J
a Q
W
G z r
tl
Y
v
O W J
Y
p
y
O
!0
w
m Hy� 5 pFf
C O
p
C
al
C
p
C
C
p pV
LL O
m
t
B
t
O
C w
q,J
l0 Q� J
G
y p w
OpL
C
Y
p •Y
M 1
3
� O
O C
r O !y
r N
!1
J
N
J
a = a
C*NOTE (Footnote to Table II, line 19, and Tcbls III, line 21.)
The goal shows only 19 units for the elderly consistent with the
proportlan of needs and available funds. This goal is too small to allow for
a feasible senior citizen project. A goal large enough to accnmuodate a
feasible development, in order to maintain proportionality by family type,
would necessitate total goals which are extremely unrealistic both In relation
to need and to available resources. Therefore, if an assisted elderly housing
development is proposed, the City of gaucho Cucamonga will consider mending
Its NAP to accommodate the project and will at that time request • waiver of
proportionality requirements based on reasonable level of effort and past
performance.
D-
C NARRATIVE DISCUSSION OF HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAFONCA
1985 -88 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
1. Definition of Substandard
Units are considered cc be substandard if they do not meet the
requirements of the Uniform Housing Code. These requirements generally
exceed the Section 8 Exisring housing quality standards.
II. Definition of Unite Suitable for Rehabilitation
Housing units are considered suitable for rehabilitation if they are
structurally sound and the cost of rehabilitation will not exceed the
lower of the following measures:
-802 of replacement cost of the unit /structure
-802 of the market value after rehabilitation
212. Estimates of the Number of Lover Income households Expected to Reside In
Rancho Cucamonga
The estimates for the number of additional lover income households
expected to reside QTR) in Rancho Cucamonga by 1988 are derived from the
C Regional Housing Allocation Model (RHAM) prepared by the Southern
California Association of Governments. Since the KHAN covers the five
Year period from 1987 -1988, 602 of their estimate was used for this three
Year HAP. The percent allocated to each family type is based me a
butlon prepared by HUD,
Cucamonga. SHAD for the region which Includes Raneho
Cucamo
IV. Assessment of the impact of Condominium Conversions
Although there vas soma conversion of rental housing to condominiums prior
to 1987, there hex been no interest in conversion In race,t years.
Rxthar, there has been a revival of construction of apartments. Rancho
Cucamonga's condominium ordinance limits conversions to no more than
one -half the number of rental units added to the housing stock within the
preceding year. No di$placement is expected as a result of conversions
during the 1985 to 1988 HAP period.
V. Miniority Household Needs
Estimates of minority housing needs were updated using proportions from
the 1980 Census applied to 1985 household estimates fo: the City from the
State Department of Finance.
A. Black
r 1. Lower income households in substandard housing:
12 owners; 2 renters
40LA
'63
C
2.
Lover income households requiring rental subsidies:
1 eldarlj; 12 small family; 3 large family
3.
Lover Income households to be dieplaced:
none
B. Spanish Origin
1.
Lower income households In substandard housing.
74 owners; 14 renters
2.
Lower income households requiring rental assistance:
16 elderly; 116 60411 family; 31 large family
3.
Lower income households to be displaced:
none
C. Native American
1.
Lower Loewe households in substandard housings
4
owners; I rancor
2.
Lower incwe households requiring rental subsidies:
I elderly; 12 small family; 3 large family
3.
Lower income households to be displaced:
none
D. Asian or Pacific Islander
1.
Lower income households in substandard housing:
10 owners; 2 renters
2.
Lover lncwe households requiring rental subsidies:
I elderly; g small family; 2 large family
3.
Lowe, income households to be displaced:
none
2
C
C
V1. Handicapped Housing Needs
Estimates of handicapped housing needs were updated based an the
Proportions of the population found to be handicapped in a 1978 survey
conducted by the State Oepartasnt of Rehabilitation. These proportions
vere applied to the 1985 household estimates prepared by the State
Department of Finance. Using this methodology, a total of 1,920 peracns
in Rancho Cucamonga are :atlmated to have disabilities uhlch ells(( thnir
housing needs (such as blindness, deafness, muatu loskel atal eaffecto th
Amputations, deformities, paralysis, muscular dystrophy, ate.).
Moat of the disabled are not in lover income households. In addition,
about 72 of the disabled are also elderly.
Total Low, Income Renters
Single individuals 787 39
In Small Families 1,018 51
In Large Families 115 6
1,920 126
V11. Single Parent Household Hoods
Estimates of the number of single Parent families needing assistance were
4pdated by applying percentages derived from the 1980 Census data to the
1985 Department of Flnancn estimates of rho number of households to Rancho
Cucamonga.
Total Single Parent Households 1,656
Pcmale- Headed 1,292
Lover Income Single Parent Households 506
Female - Headed 434
Estimated to Heed Rental Assistance 312
Fe a a I e- Headed 280
VIII Other Special pausing Needs
None.
3
6.5
NARRATIVE 702 THREe =YEAR AND ONE -YBd2 COALS
( 1985 -1988 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONCA
1. Displacement
No substandard units are expected to be demolished ar lever income
households relocated as a result of direct Federal, State, or local
action,.
11. Actions the City Will Take to Implement Its One and Three Year Goals:
A. Mortgage Revenue Bonds (owner)
The Red.voloPeant Agency sells aartgage cavenuc bonds to provide below
market mortgage financing for owner occupants• Most users will be
eoderate income, none a -a expected to be low Income. Issuca funding
an estimated 1,500 mortgages have bean sold in the peat three years.
The goal will be realized, therefore, subject only to market
conditions and the developers' ability to develop and sell the homes.
8. Hult L- yaeily Revenue Bonds (renter)
By Caoptration &?cement with the County of San Bernardino, rental
Cprojects in Rm:r.m Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted
to low Income taasaholds at rents lets than 30 percent of income, may
be financed with County Hulti - family Mortgage Revenue Bonds Issues
funding about 500 units In Rancho Cucamonga have been financed in this
manner. Score 250 ndditional units have been proposed. Developer
Interest is Currently very strong. Hcvever, market conditions and
developer performance will dictate whether the units committed are
completed.
C. CDBC Rehabilitation Loans
Through a ecntC4Ct with the County of San Bernardino, the City offers
lew interest rehabilitation loans to lover income households citywfda.
ApProxioatcly 8.5 units per year or 25 units will be brought up to
standard through this program. Rental Rehab loans are given only to
structures to be occupied solely by lower income ranters. Rents after
rehab may not exceed :0T of tenant income. Five units will be brought
up to stan•,srd through this program.
D. Senior Eel Raney Repair Grants
Through a contract with Bar Bernardino County, the I:ity offers
soargency repair services to lover income, senior hnaeowners In the
City. Approximately 25 units per year, or 75 units in total will be
Lassisted through this program.
401.8
C
C
A
E. Section 8 Existing (or successor program)
The City has entered a cooperation ogreement with the Hcueing
Authority of the County of San Bernardino to administer the Section
8 Existing program. The goals reflect the reduced funding for this
program and the fact that rents in the City are often higher than
Pair Harket Rents. However, there is a good potential of using
Section 8 Existing in the density bonus affordable housing to be
produced as a part of the large planned developments under
construction in the City.
P. Article XXXIV Referendum Authority
The voters of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a referendum
Allowing public ownership or financing of low rent housing pursuant to
Article XXXIV of the State Constitution. This enables use of public
housing and various multi - family financing programs. There are
currently eleven units of scattered site public housing in the City.
The City has entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the Housing
Authority of the County of Bar.. Bernardino for use of the Public
Housing Program. No funding is anticipated for this program in the
!lest Housing Assistance plan year. However, agreements arc in place
should funding become available.
i
C. Affordable Housing Incentives
Stars law requires cities to offer incentives (including public
improvements or density bonuses) to any project with a least 251 of
the unite affordable to low and moderate income households. Several
Of the Planned Communities in Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments
for the development of affordable housing in the text of the
approved or proposed Community Plan. The developer commits to
develop a percentage of unite at prices or rents affordable to lover
Income households, in exchange for City incentives.
H. Redevelopment
201 of Tax increment funds from the City's redevelopment projects will
be used to ssaist low income housing development as necessary and as
funds become available.
24%
C
C
A
M1
9 2
t o
O
lQ
fd g
1 F
a E
�a F
6.S G
Z
o�
N 0
II o
J
Q
H
C
RIJ
N
L(M
2.G
O
O
m
o
N
=
V)
>
>,
U
C
co
C.)
U
E
-j
a
�
U
C
�
V
N
N
N
V
C
W
CMETHODOLOGICAL NOTES
1985 -1988
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Part 1: HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Table 7 - Housing Stock Conditions
This table addresses the condition of the existing housing stock. The
information was updated to 1985 using State Department of Finance estimates frr
January 1, 1985. The proportion owner- occupied, renter-accupiad units and
vacant units were taken from the 1980 Census and applied to the 1985 data.
Llkevise, the proportion of substandard units is based on a HUD formula
developed for the last HAP which considers the proportion of units which are
more than 40 years old, the proportion of overcrowded units, the proportionJof
unite lacking complete plumbing, and the proportion of units lacking complete
kitchen facilities This formula was applied to the 1985 unit estimates.
Table It - Rental Needs of _Laver Income Households
This table includes both existing needs and the needs expected to result from
lower income households moving to Rancho Cucamonga. Jerry Nakano, an economist
C In the Los Angeles HUD office, provided the estimates for existing needs shown
on lines 8, 9 and 10. Future nerds, or those lover income households Expected
to Reside (ETR) in Rancho Cucamonga, are shown in line 11. According to HUD
regulations (Appendix A. RAP Guidelines), the City wet use the growth figures
contained in the Regional Housing Allocation Model (RHAM) developed by the
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Since the RHAM is a
five -year estimate (1987 - 1988), we took 605 of the RHAN growth estimate for
lover income households for the total households and distributed them Into
small family, large family and elderly based on the proportions shown on line 9.
No residential units are expected to be demolished as a result of Federal,
State, or local projects within Rancho Cucamonga over the next J years.
Therefore, line 12 shows zeroes.
Part I1: THREE -YEAR COAL
Table I: Units To Be Assisted
Column L - Rehabilitation of substandard units. This goal was based on tht
Past perfo:"nce of the rehabilitation loan program. It does not include
emergency repair grants A 5 unit goal for rehabilitation of rental units In
Ireluded In recognition /hope that the new rental rehab program operated by Lan
Bernardino County will be available to Rancho Cucamonga also. This is a
conse•vative goal which we should be able to meet. Since all participants
.aunt be lover Income, the figures for lines 15 and 16 are the same as those
for Vote 17 and 18.
l
CColumn M - New Construction. The goals in this column reflect the revenue -
bond funded projects for which financing will be available. If the tax law
does not change, there are likely to be many more of these units. However, in
light of the uncertainty on this point, a conservative estimate is advisable.
Only 202 of the rental units will some lover income households (lino 18); the
rest will be moderate income.
Column N - Conversion. No structures not currently in residential use are
expected to be converted to residential use.
Column 0 - Home Improvements. This column contains the goals for the
emergency repair program. The target is based on continuation of current
levels of activity. Since all participants must be lower income the figures
for lines 15 and 17 are the same.
Table li - Lower Income Households To Receive Rental Subsidies
The City has additional Article XXXIV referendum authority and with the
upswing in rental construction, there Will be more opportunity for Section 8
eligible households to use the program in the City. Based on past program
experience, most of these households are likely to be current City residents.
The additional households assisted with Section 8 funding will must the
minimum goals for HUD resources. The table also reflects the 100 units which
will be assisted by the rental revenue bond program. This is again a
cons *mative goal based on past performance and projects in the pip-'Ina.
Table III - Goals for HUD Resources
Line 21 identifies the proportion of the goal, in Table II which are expected
to be funded by Federal (HUD) funda. Line 22 identifies the maximum number of
oech type of unit which will be accepted by the City. Larger projects or a
tital in exceos of this figure require City and HUD approval.
2 70
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 15, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
DY: Howdrd Fields, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR DEVI MENT REVIEW 85 -15 -
WN
AGE STOP
-
eve - or t o .15trUCt on o a miT
storage d opment totaling 45,000 square fret on 1.17
acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) District,
located on the north side of Fourth Street, east of Turner
Avenue - APN 210 - 371 -03
I. BACKGRQND: On September 11, 1985, the Planning Commission denied
he pro ect proposal after many deliberations during the course of
1985. Subsequently, the applicant filed an a ^peal to the City
Council. On November 6, 1985, the City Council reviewed and upheld
the Planning Commission's decision of denial and farther determined
the project proposal to be inappropriate due to site constraints
and design problems. Staff was directed to prepare the attached
Resolution of Denial for formal adoption by the City Council.
II. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council re,,iew and
cons er t e attached Resolution of Denial. If Council determines
that the findings reflect the Council's action, then adoption of
the Resolution of Denial would be in order.
R ectfully ub ,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB :HF:ko
Attachments: Resolution of Denial
7l
RESOLUTION NO ftrY- 't9 -V'M g(P _04
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE AN
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, NO. D.R. 85 -15, TO
CONSTRUCT AND 144INTAIN A MINI - STORAGE FACILITY, ON
PROPERTY WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND
LOCATED AT 10210 4TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
(1) Don Valk, as President of and on behalf of, ASSURED MINI -
STORAGE, INC., has filed an application for Development Review, No. U.R. 85-
15, described above in the title of this resolution Hereinafter in this
resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as 'the
application.'
(ii) On September 11, 1985, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter
of the application and following the conclusion of said September 11, 1985
hearing, the Plannirg Commission adopted its Resolution No. 85 -134, thereby
denying the application.
(iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commission
resolution L,s timely appealed to this Council.
(tv) On November 6, 1985, this Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(v) A•1 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City
Cuuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this resolution are true and correct
2 8asod upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above - referenced November 6, 1985 hearing, Including written staff
reports, the minutes of the above- referenced Planning Commission meeting and
the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 85 -134, this Council
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to Property within the Industrial
Specific Plan (Subarea 6 - Industrial Park District) and located on the north
side of Fourth Street, east of Turner;
7D-
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. P01- 15 -OIR
OR 85 -15 RESOLUTIOh OF DENIAL
January 15, 1986
Page 2
b. Tha property to the north of the subject site is located within
the Industrial Specific Plan and is currently undeveloped and v, cant. The
property to the south of he subject site is located within the City of
Ontario, within the Chevron Specific Plan, and is currently undeveloped and
vacant. The property to the east of the subject site is located within the
Industrial Specific Plan and Is currently developed with an existing
industrial facility. The property to the west of the s-•bject site Is located
within the Industrial Specifrlc Plan and is currently undeveloped and vacant;
C. The project contemplated involves the construction and
maintenance of a mini- storage facility totalling approximately 45,000 square
feet. Such use as contemplated conforms to the General Plan of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and is a permitted use within the Industrial Park District of
the Industrial Specific Plan;
d. The application has bean submitted pursuant to requirements of
Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code to allow design review of the proposed
use so to minimize any adverse impact on the visual or aesthetic environmen
surrounding the subject site and to ensure a harmonious appearance of the
proposed use in conformity with al applicable local design guidelines,
standards and oroinances;
e. The development as prnposed in the subject Development Review
application would contradict the goals and objectives of both the Industrial
Specific Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would
promote a detrimental condition to the persons and property in the immediate
vicinity of the subject site, for the reasons as follows:
(i) The Industrial Park District of the Industrial Specific
Plan, in which the subject site is located, has as Its goal the reservation of
land for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working
environment and a location which has prestige value. The development and
design standards for such area are intended to protect against those
d. velopments which are Inappropriate due to either function, appearance or
environmenta effects. Nore specifically, the design and development criteria
for Subarea 6 of the Industrial Specific Plan, in which the subject site is
located, calls `or development to provide a high quality character associated
with an °office park* type of development;
(11) The subject development site is located on a long and
narrow parcel (approximately 100 feet x 600 feet), the same being formerly a
re,nnant of a flood control channel;
(iii) Due to the constraints of the parcel involved, the subject
application proposes two parallel buildings running lengthwise the parcel;
each approximately two stories in height and each approximately 400 feet in
length. The net observable appearance of ouch proposed design by adjacent
parcels would be a massive, monolithic and linear wall;
(iv) Such design as proposed would clearly be Inconsistent with
the low intensity office park development proposed for the area and,
accordingly, such design would have an adverse impact on the property values
of those parcels in the immediate vicinity of the subject site.
73
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION h0. POI-IS-01R
OR 85 -15 RESOLUTION OF DENIAL
January 15, 1986
Page 3
f. Although the application has attempted to address the adverse
impacts of the proposed building by designing increased landscaping and false
windows within the outer perimeter wells, su;h design qualities do rot
significantly mitigate the adverse impacts inentified in subparagraph e,
above.
4. Based on the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above - referenced November 6, 1985 hearing and upon the specific
findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, above, this Council
hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use 1s not in accord with the objectives of the
Development Code of the City of Rancho C--camonga or the purposes of the
Industrial Specific Plan In which the site 1. located;
b. The pi Posed use, togetionr with the conditions applicab:e
thereto, will be detrimental to the publb: health, safety, or welfare and wil'
be materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity; and
C. The evidence presented to this Council has identified
substantial potential adverse effects of the design and development specified
in the application.
S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Council hereby denies without prejudice the
application.
6. This Council hereby provides notice to Mr. Don Valk, as President
of ASSURED MINI- STORAGE, INC., that the time within which judicial review of
the decision represented by this resolution must be sought is goverend by the
provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Sect4on 1094.6.
7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to (a) certify to the adoption
of this resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this
resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to Mr. Don Valk at
his address per City records.
PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Hikels, Mayor
7q
r7m no D A Alrtrn rrTr A xrnur_a
The City Council on December 19, 1985 adopted Resolution No 35 -339 declaring
its intention to vacate a portion of Almond Street between Beryl Street and
Amethyst Avenue and set the date of public hearing on January 15, x986 for
said vacation
The ity's current Community Trail plan designates a trail through the area
proposed for vacation A major drainage course separates the area proposed
for vacation from Almond Street cul -de -sac to the east This render! the
designated trail unfeasible for trail use
The developers of Tentative Tract No 11626 (the applicants of the above
vacation), are in the process of providing suitable easements to the City
for community trail purposes to replace that being vacated by the proposed
vacation.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the order to vacate be continued to February 5, 1986
Respectfully sub itted,
LB VV:,laa
75-
STAFF REPORT'
n�
�
c
�'
DATE:
January 15, 1986
�� 70
z
i
TO.
City Council and City Manager
1977
FROM:
Lloyd 0 Hubbs, City Engineer
BY:
Va ^tan V. Vartanians, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
ORDERPG THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF ALMOND STREET
BETWEEN
BERYL STREET AND AMETHSYT AVENUE - CONTINUANCE
The City Council on December 19, 1985 adopted Resolution No 35 -339 declaring
its intention to vacate a portion of Almond Street between Beryl Street and
Amethyst Avenue and set the date of public hearing on January 15, x986 for
said vacation
The ity's current Community Trail plan designates a trail through the area
proposed for vacation A major drainage course separates the area proposed
for vacation from Almond Street cul -de -sac to the east This render! the
designated trail unfeasible for trail use
The developers of Tentative Tract No 11626 (the applicants of the above
vacation), are in the process of providing suitable easements to the City
for community trail purposes to replace that being vacated by the proposed
vacation.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the order to vacate be continued to February 5, 1986
Respectfully sub itted,
LB VV:,laa
75-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 15, 1986
TO: Mayar and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
85-04 T 0 N CU ANA - roposai to amend
sect ons -F perta n ng to "Landscaping" and
17.08 -040 -1 pertaining to "Slope Planting-, of tF_
Oevelooment Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Ordinance No 211
BACKGROUND: This amendment would revise two sectio:.c of the
Oeve opment Code, one regarding landscaping, and the other in
reference to slope planting.
The amendment to the landscaping standards would revise
requirem.nts for tree planting for applicable residential
developments by reducing the number of trees required, but
increasing their sizes This amendment has as its purpose an
adjustment in the relationship in tree numbers versus tree sizes to
produce a landscaping program that would ba more effective in its
design, and would be more consistent with the goals and policies as
established by the General Plan
The other amendment is to the section pertaining to slope
planting. Its purpose is to bring Development Code standards into
conformance with established City policies and procedures for
grading
11. CORRESPONUENCE: Tnis Development Cede Amendment has been
a vert s as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper.
III FACTS FOR FINDING: Before approving the Development Code
en meat, t e ouncil must determine that the amendment will not
be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant
environmental impacts in addition, the proposal must be
consistent with the intent of the General Plan and the Development
Code.
7�
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
OCA 85 -04 - The City of Rancho Cucamonga
January 15, 1986
Page 2
IV. RECOFP-0'K The Planning Commission recommends approval of
t s OTii eveiopment Code Amendment. If the City Council concurs,
issuance of a Iles tive Declaration and adoption of the attached
Ordinance would be appropriate.
Respectfully submitted
dGeiezr,��
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BC:ns
Attachments: Planning Comiission Staff Report - November 27, 1985
Planning Comaission Resolution
City Council Ordinance
77
C
C
L
I. ANALYSIS: Table 17.08.040 -F of the Development Code establishes
minnTmums -for both the numbers and sizes of trees to be included
within the landscaping for residential protects. Over the past
several months as staff has conducted several field Inspections at
various protect locations, it has come to our attention that the
Development Code requirements per this table do not appear to be
producing the desired results of softening the impact of the built
form, to Integrate adjacent structures into cohesive units, and to
enhance the visual image and quality of the environment. The
primary problem attributable to the current landscaping standards
responsible for this is the predominance of numbers of trees
required In relation to the sizes of the trees required. The
current standard requires greater numbers of trees to be planted,
but at smaller sizes. This has resulted In protects being so
densely planted that landscapers are losing the flexibility to
strategically locate plants to achieve the desired functions of
beauty, shading, wind protection, buffering, etc. Also, due to the
predominance of the current standard towards smaller size trees,
the landscaping provided at the initial stage of development is
unable to provide the dram sic statement needed to enhance the
visual image of the environment that 1s desired.
As a solution, staff 1s proposing a revised Landscaping Standards
Table (see Resolution) that shifts the relationships towards
requiring more larger -sized trees at the time of project
development with the trade -off being fewer numbers of trees
planted. Staff believes that with •his revision there will be a
more equitable distribution between numbers of trees as compared to
sizes of trees resulting in an overall landscaping program that
will be more effective in its design and will be more consistent
with the goals and policies as established by the General Plan.
.
ITEM H
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Afo
'�,
STAFF REPORT
��' �
.I
C 0
A
7
DATE:
November 27,
1985
1977
TO:
Chairman and
Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Brad Buller,
City Planner
BY:
Bruce Cock, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT & DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
85-
-
ect ons
N U NG propose to amend
pertaining to 'Landscaping-, nd
17.08.040 -1,
pertaining to 'Slope Planting",
of the
Development
Code of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga,
Ordinance No.
211
I. ANALYSIS: Table 17.08.040 -F of the Development Code establishes
minnTmums -for both the numbers and sizes of trees to be included
within the landscaping for residential protects. Over the past
several months as staff has conducted several field Inspections at
various protect locations, it has come to our attention that the
Development Code requirements per this table do not appear to be
producing the desired results of softening the impact of the built
form, to Integrate adjacent structures into cohesive units, and to
enhance the visual image and quality of the environment. The
primary problem attributable to the current landscaping standards
responsible for this is the predominance of numbers of trees
required In relation to the sizes of the trees required. The
current standard requires greater numbers of trees to be planted,
but at smaller sizes. This has resulted In protects being so
densely planted that landscapers are losing the flexibility to
strategically locate plants to achieve the desired functions of
beauty, shading, wind protection, buffering, etc. Also, due to the
predominance of the current standard towards smaller size trees,
the landscaping provided at the initial stage of development is
unable to provide the dram sic statement needed to enhance the
visual image of the environment that 1s desired.
As a solution, staff 1s proposing a revised Landscaping Standards
Table (see Resolution) that shifts the relationships towards
requiring more larger -sized trees at the time of project
development with the trade -off being fewer numbers of trees
planted. Staff believes that with •his revision there will be a
more equitable distribution between numbers of trees as compared to
sizes of trees resulting in an overall landscaping program that
will be more effective in its design and will be more consistent
with the goals and policies as established by the General Plan.
.
ITEM H
Staff has also presented to the Planning Commission a proposed
revision to the Slope Planting Standard (see Exhibit °B•). The
purpose of this amendment is to bring Development Code Standards
into conformance with established City policy and procedures for
grading. Slope planting requirements have a two -fold purpose:
erosion control and for aesthetics to soften thr visual impact of
the slope ,. ane. The current standard addres.es the aesthet
concerns of :lope planting on steeper and more pronounced slopes;
the revi;ed standard also incorporates the need for erosion contrul
on less steep, but still potentially erodible slopes, into the
Development Code Standard.
II. ENVIRONS WAL tSSESSMENT: Staff recommends that the Planning
omm semis o -fie the- 7indings requlreJ puruant to Division 13,
Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code that would
not require subsequent or sup,llemental Environmental Impact Report
id recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. This finding is
based upon the fact that the Development Code implements the
existing goals and policies of the General Plan which were fully
analyzed with regard to environmental impacts during the General
Plan EIR.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before approving this Development Code
Amendment, tha toMmIssion must determine that the amendment will
not be detrimental for individuals and for property, or will not
cause significant c- ironmental impacts. In addition, this project
must be consiste• th U-e intent of the General Plan.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This Development Code Amendment has been
a ver�t sea as a public hearing to The Daily Report newspaper.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commirs .,n
rev e1T elements and input regarding this proposal. If the
Commission determines that this D- veloPment Code Amendment is
consistent with the Facts for Finding, then issuance of a Negative
Declaration and adoption of the attached resolution would be in
order.
Respectfully su itted
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:6C:ko
7Y A
,4/- 2
{
4
C
C
C
PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85 -04
November 27, 1985
Page 3
Attachments: Exhibit •A' - Landscaping Standard - Current & Proposed
Exhibit •B• - Scope Planting Standard - Current &
Proposed
Resolution
7� y -s
G U FL.l��e.� —r
F. Lendsceoine. Trees perform many essential functions for the community: beauty,
shading, wind protection, screening, noise buffering and air filtering. Plant
selected to such as wind, and low wateachieve All trees uspurposes, d ust be colnsisten wtith adopted
tree Palette pursuant to the General Plan.
The following table, Table 17.08.040 -F, sets forth minimum standards (or the
number and size of trees, both on- and off -site, as required In Tables 17.08.040 -B
and CI however, does not apply to single family detached or duplex dwellings.
D15THICT TABLE 17.08.040 -P LANDSCAPE STANDARt1S
FEATURE L11 ht MH H
1. / trees /gross acre 40 SO 60 70
2. % box trees 10 20 30 30
3. % 15 -gallon trees 80 70 60 70
4. % 5 - gallon trees 30 10 10 0
�RbF�SE�� �TAIaR�R�:
•F. _Landscaping. Trees perform many essential
functton" s for the community: beauty, shading,
wind protection, screening, noise buffering and
air filtering. Plant material should be selected
to achieve these purposes, while tolerant to
factors such as wind, heat and low water. All
trees used must be cons,stent with adopted tree
patlette pursuant to the General Plan. The
following table. Table 17.080.040 -F, sets forth
minimum standards for the number and size of trees
both on- and off -site, as required in Tables
17.08.040 -8 and C; however, it does apply to
single family detached or duplex dwellings.
TABLE 17.08.040 -F LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
DISTRICT FEATURE
LM
M
MH
M
1. / trees /gross acre
40
45
50
50
2. % 480 box or larger trees
0
0
5
10
3. % 36' box trees
0
10
5
10
4. It 240 box trees
10
10
20
10
S. It 15 gallon trees
90
80
70
70
Box size trees shall be primarily concentrated aloig
exterior streetscapes and at entry nodes as accent
treatment'; and
CITY or rM%I: P_CA. &J2-0.4
IRAIICHO CUCANIO\GA TrrLr,
PLANNING DIVISION E \I IiIii7• n u SCALE,
NAl
C
Sloop Plantin¢. Slope banks in excess of five (5) feet in vertical height and of 2:1
or greater slope shall be landscaped and Irrigated for erosion control and soften
their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft.
Of slope area, one 1- 9811on or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area,
and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of eight (8) feet
In vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also lncludo ono 5 -gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees end shrubs shall be
planted In staggered clusters to soften and vary, slope plane. Slope planting
required by this Section shall Include a permanent Irrigation system to be Installed
by the developer prior to occupancy. Maintenance by a Homeowner's Association
may be required by the Plannin; Commission on a case -by -case basis.
'I. Slope Planting. Slope banks five (5) feet or
C greater in vertical height and of 5.1 or greater
slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at
minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate
groundcover fcr erosion control. Slope banks five
(5) feet or greater in vertical height and of 2:1
or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated
for erosion control and to soften their appearance
as follows: one 15 gallon or larger size tree per
each 150 square feet of slope area, one 1 gallon
or larger size shrub for each 100 square feet of
slope area, and appropriate groundcover. In
addition, slope banks to excess of eight (8) feet
to vertical and of 2 1 or greater slope shall also
include one 15 gallon or larger size tree per each
250 square feet of slope area. Trees and shrubs
shall be planted to staggered clusters to soften
and vary slope plane Slope planting required by
this section shall include a permament irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to
occupancy. Maintenance by a Homeowners
Association may be required by the Planning
Commission on a case -by -case basis.
CITY Or
L RANCHO CUCAVIO\GA
PLANNiNG DIVLSION
•r
TITIL. .0 i�l�e iSt_ 1.� G ��
EXHIBIT: i' lid,
NS
CIS OF RANCHO CUC&,fOhCA
PARS IS - INITIAL STL'Oy
EAVIRO\IMN, AL CRFCRLIsT
APPLICA% -r:
- � e
FILL \0 DATE: �tjp� 100 h1jMERs_j�/�, pity 04 PROJECTs_%iM¢el0e�.tgt,1T
PROJECT LOCATION:_?.1�,� ------
I. E.VIRO \"`' >TAL FACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "aayoa"
sheets). answers are required on attached
l
16 signs and
the
y�S NAYBE NO
proposal have
significant results in:
in:
a. Unstable grouadcondicioas or in changes in
geologic
relationships?
b. Disruptions, displacements,
--
compaction or
burial of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
contour iutervals7
d. Thy destruction, covering or modificatlon
Of any unlqua
geologic or physical features?
as Any Potential increase In wind or water
erosion
_—
of Boils, affecting either on or off
site conditansT
f• Changes in erosion Siltation, or deposition?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such
as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
h. An Increase in the race of extraction and /or
use
of any mineral resource?
2. RydrOIOCV. Will the proposal have lgnifgcant
rcaulcs in:
--
''�. //p /_
C
A
7
Page 2
•. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources? =
b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
c. Alteration of local or regional climatic --
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
4. of — x
Plora. Will the proposal have significant results
ini
a. Change In the characteristics of species,
including diversity, dlatrSbutfon, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
YES tan \0
A.
Changes In ...rents, or the co urse of direction
of flowing
sumacs, rivers, or ephemeral stream
channolsi
b.
Changes In absorption
--
rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of sur face
runoff? water
c.
Alterations to the courso or flow of flood
waters?
d.
Change In the amount of surface
--
water in any
body of water?
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration
of surface water quality?
f.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g.
Change In the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct
--
additions or wlch-
dravals, or through Interferen to with
Aquifer? an
Quality?
Quantity?
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other -
wiae
--
available for public water supplies?
d.
Exposure of people or property to water
ralated hazards
--
such as flooding or seichea7
3. Air pus i . Will the proposal have significant
_ --
results
In:
•. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources? =
b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
c. Alteration of local or regional climatic --
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
4. of — x
Plora. Will the proposal have significant results
ini
a. Change In the characteristics of species,
including diversity, dlatrSbutfon, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
?age 3
YES u.' 8% \0
C. Introduction of new or 'Ssruptive species of
Plants into an area?
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
production?
Fa_ una. Will the proposal have significant result,
fn:
A- Change in the characteristics of species•
Including
diversity, distribution, or numbers
of
any species of animals?
--
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of anlmals?
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
co the migration or movement of animals?
_
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish
--
wildlife habit,,, or
S. Ponularlon. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, dintrl-
bucion, dens i'Yo diversity•
or growth race of
the human population
of an area?
--
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
C
6. Soclo- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant
results ing
a. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics,
including economic or
eo=ercial diversity, tax
rate, and property
values?
—_
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
at:ong Project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7. land Use and Kann.na Considerations. Will the
Proposal have algnif icanc resin to in?
J1. A substantial It a ration of the present or
Planned land use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing cons =ptiva or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities?
g/-,q
Page 4
YES MAYSF No
`
g. Tesnsoortat ion. Will the proposal have significant
LClYt C3 in:
a. Generation of substantial addlelonal vehicular
ooveeent?
b. Effects on existing streets, or deaand for
—_
new street construction?
C' Effects or existing parking facilities,
or
deaand for new parking?
d Substantial iopaut upon existing transports -
tlon
systeos?
e, Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion
or ooveoent of People and /or goods?
f• Alterations to or effects on present and
Potential water- borne, rail, oars transit or
air traffic?
Be Increases in traffic hazards to toter vehicles,
bicyclists
or pedestrians?
9, Cultural Resources. 11111 the proposal have
Csignificant
results in:
A- A disturbance to the inregrlty of archaeological.
Paleontological,
and /o historical rebources?
_ --
10. Health. Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
Proposal have significant gnif� �eaul ca !n:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of People to potential health hazards?
_ --
c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
_
d An increase in the nutber of individuals
or specie3 of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organises?
--
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
Le
f, Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
-��
8• The creation of objectionable odors?
h, An increase In light or glare?
R
rage S
r_s °a =ae as
11 Aesthetics. WL11 the proposal have sign!! Stan[
*caulc. ln:
C
a The obstruction or degradation of
vista or view? any scenic
b. The creation of an aesthetically of
site!
--
_—
c. A conflict with the objective of designated
.L
or potential scenic Corridors?
12. Utilities end Public Services. Will the
proposes
have a 5lgnlficant need for new systems, or
alterations
to thr following=
a. 21cctric power?
b. Natural or packaged gas?
r
- -_
c. Co =unications sy.tccs?
d. Water supply?
I. Wastewator facilities?
-
f. Flood control structures?
So Solid Waste facilities?
h. Fire protection?
—�
1. Police protection?
J. Schools?
-�
k. Parks or other recreational tocillctes?
--
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
--
roads and flood control faeilltios?
o. Other governeental services?
17. £nerev and Scarce Resourt as. Will the
proposal
have algnificant results ins
a. Use of substantial or excoaslvo fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in dm-and
upon existing
sources of energy?
4-
e. An increase in the demand for develapeent o1
new sources of energy?
d. An increase or perpetuation of the
- --
consumption
of non - renewable fotcs of energy wfeasible
when fet
reaovable sources of energy are a vwhen
/1-i0 gy -s�
- - x
C
YES war s0
e. Substantial natural depletion e? any nonrenewable or
amerce natural reaouree?
14 Nandatory Findings of Sig, lf Stance.
a Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
Importcnt examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -tam, to the disadvantage of long -tom,
environmental goals? (A short -tem Impact on the
environment is one which occurs In a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well Into the future) _
e. Does the project have impacts which are
Individually limited• but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the Incremental effects of an
Individual project are considerable when viewed
In connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
d. noes the Project have environmental effects —_
which +111 cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _
II. DISCUSSIOA OF E%t•IRM'gr \TAL EVALUATIO`J (i.e., of affirmative answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of Proposed mitigation measures).
"ra 7 &Vmr. IMPLBMiwSTS -r_%=
�rrit� 14
leN+�s f (xx.wa+s r
F'-t`�'f ?�1•+ -`f2� �)tzrt 41aG�vsa m e,- lvtRa�.�tw.l- cat.
It-+p �e-TS 04mr44 -V1a
RL N Al (LAV4U MAT 1b
�tvtslc>J 13, GNPF�R G, laucva l
211 L G � -T1K
EPlvtcio�lMiy.1T,4. �Mewz CzaYvry'Y Llpd4t7 ,=e'c Fsv.
czo emu tseo , t zer.nv¢ '7twt a��n t tJ u 1M,,L
PR¢Q.i•P -aQ
93
Page 6
III. DETE- NINA7ION
On the basis of this Initial evaluation:
aI find the proposed project COLT) NOT have a significant effect
r, the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATIOY will be prepared.
0 I find that although the proposed Project could have a eignifitanc
effect on the enviro=ent, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mltigation measures described on an
art: tied sheet have been added to the pt
DEC.., ED
�ATION WILL BE PREPARED, eject- A NEGATIVE
envir=ent, PandoandVIVIRO MIN REPORT Is a required. on the
Page 7
Dare �f'�Z.•��r 465,g wJ(�J/!///y—
fi/blgn4cure
irle
C
RESOLUTION NO. 85 -179
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COIMISSIOS
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85 -04
AMENDING SECTIONS 17.08.040 -F, PERTAINING TO
"LANDSCAPING ", AND 17.08.040 -I, PERTAINING TO "SLOPE
PLANTING ", OF THE DEVELOPFSUT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, ORDINANCE NO. 21!
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of November, 1985, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code! and
WHEREAS, the Planning Co- .omission finds it necessary to clarify and
revise the Development Code requirevents pertaining to landscaping and slope
planting standards.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has mado the
following findings:
1. That the amendment U warranted in order to bring
current standards for landscaping and slope planting
into conformance with established City policies and
Procedures; and
2. That the proposed Development Code Amendment would
not have significant impact on the environment; and
3. That the proposed Development Code Amendment is in
conformance with the goals and policies of the
General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this project will not create significant adverse Impact on the environment and
recommenda issuance of a Negative Declaration on November 27, -985.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65650 to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 27th day of November,
1985, Development Coda Amendment 85 -04 amending
Section 17.08.040 -F as follows:
rem
WA
PLANNING CM01ISSION �— SOLUTION
DCA 85 -04
November 7, 1985
Page 2
Section 17.08.040 -F to read:
-F. Landscap!U. Trees perform many essential
functi-ni for the co=unity: beauty, shading,
wind protection, screening, noise buffering and
air filtering. Plant material should be selected
to achieve these purposes, while tolerant to
factors such as wind, heat and low water. All
trees used must be consistent with adopted tree
pallette pursuant to the Ceneral Plan.
1. The following table, Table 17.080.040 -F , sets
forth minimum standards for the number and size of
trees both on- and off -site, as required in Tables
17.08.040 -B and C; however, it does apply to
single family detached or duplex dwellings:
TABLE 17.08.040 -F LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
FEATURE
LH
DISTRICT
M Mi
H
1. p
trees /gross acre
40
45
50
50
2. 5
48^ box or larger
trees 0
0
5
10
3. S
36" box trees
0
10
5
10
4. f
24^ box trees
10
10
20
10
5. f
15 gallon trees
90
80
70
70a
Box size trees shall be primarily concentrated along
exterior streetacapes and at entry nodes as accent
treatment.
flew windrow plantings of Eucalyptus Yaculata
(Spotted Gums) may be required to perpetuate a
windbreak system at a ratio of 50 linear feet per
acre The location of required windrow plantings
shall be generally guided by the establiahe'
330'X660' grid pattern. Required windrows may
follow any portion of this grid, provided the
total length of windrows meets or exceeds the
minimum length. The use of the 3304060' planting
grid 1s not meant to discourage development of
curvilinear local streets. The size, spacing,
staking, and irrigation of these trees shall be in
accordance with the tree replacement policies set
forth in Section 19.L8 080
M
PLANNING COMISSION `,.SOLUTION
DOA 85-04
November 7, 1985
Page 2
Section 17.08.040 -F• to read:
"F. Landscaping. Trees perform many essential
funatlons for the community: beauty, shading,
wind protection, screening, noise buffering and
air filtering. Plant material should be selected
Lo achieve these purposes, while tolerant to
factors such as wind, heat and low water. All
trees used must be consistent with adopted tree
pallette pursuant to the General Plan.
1. The following table, Table 17.080.040 -F , sets
forth minimum standards for the number and size of
trees both on- and off -site, as required In Tables
17.08.040 -B and C; however, it does apply to
single family detached or duplex dwollings:
TABLE 1/.08.040 -F LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
DISTRICT
FEATURE LH H !D) H
1. f trees /gross acre 40 45 50 50
2. f 48" box or larger trees 0 0 5 10
3. f 36" box trees 0 10 5 10
4. F 24" box trees 10 10 20 10
S. f 15 gallon trees 90 80 70 70"
Box size trees shall be primarily concentrated along
exterior streetacapes and at entry nodes as accent
treatment.
2. New windrow plantings of Eucalyptus Maculata
(Spotted Gums) may be required to perpetuate a
windbreak system at a ratio of 50 linear feet per
acre. The location of required windrow plantings
shall be generally guided by the established
3301X660' grid pattern. Required windrows may
follow any portion of this grid, provided the
total length of windrows ceeta or exceeds the
minimum length The use of the 3301X660' planting
grid 1s not meant to discourage development of
curvilinear local streets The size, spacing,
staking, and irrigation of these trees shall be in
accordance with the tree replacement policies act
forth in Section 19.08 080
0 1
PLANNING CO?MSSSIOA"- SOLUTION
DCA 85 -Ob 1965
40vember 27,
Pago 3
Amending Section 1T •00 •u40 -I ns' follows:
Section 17 08.040 -I to read:
"I Slopo�
Slope tband banks 1(or greater
than 2:7 slope, shall be, at
greater in vertical an ro riate
slope. but lass
minlcum, Srrigatad and landscaped with app
t and of 2
groundcovor for erosion control. slope banks five a :1
(5) feet or greater lands 3Ped
Sa vertical and
irrigates
or greater alope shall bo appearance
for orasion control eallon or jar or siz trees Per
B5 °allows: one 75 8 slope area, Oro 1 gallon or
each t50 seize shrub for each 100 ograro feet In
or larger and appropriate groundcoe`. feet
alODa arcs, an in excess of eight
addltfon, elope a shall also
I, vortical and ollonl or largere size tree per each
include one 15 B e area- Trees and shrubs
25p square feet of sloe area clusters to soften
shall be plantedlalne st S1oDe planting required by
and vary
slope D ermament irrigation
this section shall Sncludo Cho developer Drlor to
system to be installed intenance by a Homoownare
occupancY• be roquired Dy the Planning
pssccistior may o case bade."
Coe-SVion on a case-by-case re that the
Canmission hereby r Development
Code
2, city Flanning
council approve and
City as stated herein.
Amendment 85 -04, wtion
3, that a Certified Copy of this he sP1anningaCO=isaion
mater al hereby adopted by e P oil.
shall be forwarded to the City
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2TTH DAY OF NOVEHBEA, 1985•
PLAN 0:010F SI0t1 TH^ ITY OF AANC0 CUCAMONOA
BY:
Dennis /L. Stout, Orairs n
ATTEST: %�f Deputy Secretary
Brad Buller,
S!S-A
PLANNING COMIISSION CALUTION
DCA 85 -04
November 27, 1985
Page 4
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of ;he Planning COC>Sesian of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of November, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMU SSIONERS: STOUT, CBITIEA, BARKER, NCNIEL, MWSL
NOES: C0101ISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CO.MIISSIONERS: NONE
ORDINANCE NO.f0:- 15.OYO a $
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17,
SECTIONS 17 08 040F AND 17 08 040I OF THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING LANDSCAPING AND
SLOPE PLANTING, RESPECTIVELY
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
Amendment to Section 17.08.040 -F, "Landscaping ", and
Section 17.08- 040 -I, "Slope Planting" of the
Development Code as hereinafter described, and this
City Council has held a public hearing prescribed by
law and duly heard and considered said
recommendation.
B. That this Development Code Amendment is consistent
with the General Plan of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
C That this Amendment is consistent with the
objectives of the Development Code.
D. That this Development Code Amendment will have no
significant environmental impact as provided in the
Negative Declaration filed herein.
SECTION 2: That Section 17.08.040 -F, "Landscaping", and Section
17.08.040= 7.-Mape Planting ", are hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 17.08 040 -F to read:
Lands�ca in . Trees perform many essential functions for the
conminity: beauty, shading, wind protection, screening, noise
buffering and air filtering. Plant material should be selected
to achieve these purposes, while tolerant to factors such as
wind, heat and low water. All trees used must be consistent
with adopted tree pallette pursuant to the General Plan.
1. The following table, Table 17.080.040 -F, sets forth
minimum standards for the number and size of trees both
on- and off -site, as required in Tables 17.08.040 -B and C;
however, it does apply to single family detached or duplex
dwellings:
loom
Ordinance No POI- 15 -01 -0
Development Code Amendment 85 -04
Page 2
TABLE 17.08.040 -F LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
DISTRICT FEATURE
LM
M
M4
H
1.
; trees /gross acre
40
45
50
SO
2.
% 480 box or larger trees
0
0
5
10
3.
% 36• box trees
0
10
5
10
4.
% 240 box trees
10
10
20
10
S.
15 gallon trees
90
80
70
70
Box size trees shall be primarily concentrated along exterior
streetscapes and at entry nodes as accent treatment.
2. New windrow plantings of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted
Gums) may be required to perpetuate a windbreak system at
a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre. The location of
required windrow plantings shall be generally guided by
the established 330' .t 660' grid pattern. Required
windrows may follow any portion of this grid, provided the
total length of windrows meets or exceeds the minimum
length. The use of the 330' x 660' planting grid is not
meant to discourage development of curvilinear local
streets. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of
these trees shall be in accordance with the tree
replacement policies set forth In Section 19.08.080.
Section 17.08.040 -I to read:
Sloe Planting. Slope banks five (5) feet or greater in
vertical and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2 :1
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with
appropriate groundcover for erosion control. Slope banks five
(5 feet or greater in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and
to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 gallon or larger
size tree per each 150 square feet of slope area, one 1 gallon
or larger size shrub for each 100 square feet of slope area,
and appropriate groundcover. In addition, slope banks to
excess of eight (8) feet in vertical and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall also include one 15 gallon or larger size tree per
each 250 square feet of slope area Trees and shruos shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.
Slope planting required by this section shall include a
permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer
prior to occupancy. Maintenance by a Homeowners Association
may be required by the Planning Commission on a case -by -case
basis.
CiTY OF RADICHO CUCA1.i0DIGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 15, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
NDM NT - - C Y 0 U ON A� n�i ynendme�t
to Industrial Area bpeclfic an to add Research &
Development /Office use to Haven Avenue Overlay District.
I. BACKGROUND: Last August 21, 1985, the City Council amended the
n us r a Specific Plan to define and add Research &
Development /Office and Research & Development /Light Manufacturing
uses to the designated subareas. The purpose of tonight's action
is to to add Research and Development /Office use to the Haven
Avenue Overlay District. The Planning Commission at its regular
meeting of November 27, 1985, held a public hearing and recommended
approval of such amendment. Attached for your review is Planning
Comm:ssion staff report and minutes that fully describe the
proposed amendment
11. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
n iiTheeaii Report newspaper
III. RECOWENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the
ndustr a pecific Plan Amendment as presented. If the City
Council concurs, issuance of a Ncgative Declaration and adoption of
the attached ordinance would be appropriate.
Resgectfu to
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:NF:ko
Attachments: Plannng Commission Minutes and Staff Report,
Ncvember 27, 1985
Planning Commission Resolution of Approval
Ordinance Approving the Industrial Specific Plan
Ame:,dvent
8�
J.
nn amenumenc GO no incustrlal Area
Plan to
District. add research and development /office Use to Haven Avenue
Nancy Fong, As•joiate Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Sttut asked if the reference to R&D/Light Manufacturing in the
Resolution was in error.
Ms. Fong replied that it was.
Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no convents, therefore
the 7ublic hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitlea, to adopt the Resolution
recommending issuance of a Negative Daclaration and adoption of the Ordinance
approving Environ_ental Assessment and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment
85-05, with an amendment to strike the reference to R&D/Light Manufacturing.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOVT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried
IS
STAFF REPORT
C.
DATE: November 27, 1985 ivn
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Coanission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
AM NOM Ni - 5 - LL IT OF RANCHO CUCAMOIIGA - An amendment
•0 the n ustr a Area pet c an to add Research and
Oevelopment /Office use to Haven Avenue Overlay District.
I. BACKGROUND: Last August 21, 1985, the City Council amended the
ndu3- s—ERT -Specifl- Plan to define Research and Development /Office
and Research and Development /Light Manufacturing uses (see Exhibit
OA" 6 •B•). Based on such an amendment to the Industrial Specific
Plan, both Research and Development /Office and Research and
Development /Light Manufacturing uses are permitted in Subarea 6.
This amendment created an inconsistency with the Haven Avenue
Overlay District where the two uses are not listed as permitted.
To eliminate such inconsistency, staff is proposing an amendment to
the Haven Avenue Overlay District to permit Research and
Development /Office
use . Attached for your review is a proposed ordinance &Tending
the Haven Avenue Overlay District to add such uses.
!I. ENViR01DiENTA' ASSESSMENT: Staff recommends that the Planning
assn ss an ma a the ndings required pursuant to Division 13,
Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code that would
not required subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report
and recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration This finding is
based upon the fact that an environmental impact report was fully
analyzed during the Industrial Specific Plan process. Further, a
Negative Declaration had been issued during the adoption of the
Haven gvenue Overlay District.
I11. CORRE'PONOENUE This item has been advertised as a public hearing
n Th %D�iy Report newspaper.
iv. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
Teter niac the proposed amendment is consistent with the
Industrial Specific Plan ani the Haven Avenue Overlay District
through adoption of the attached resolution recommending approval
of the proposed amendment ano issuance of a Negative Declaration to
the City Council would be appropriate
W ITEM J
PLANNING COMMISSION STAB REPORT
ISP AMENDMENT 85 -05
November 27, 1985
Page 2
Respectfully su tte�D��
�yBrad Buller
City Planner
BB:NF:ko
Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Table III - 1 Summary of Land Use by
Subarea
Exhibit •B' - Definition of Research and Development
Uses
Exhibit •C' - Haven Avenue Overlay District - Land Use
Types
Initial Study Part II
Resolution
Ordinance
-IT - a
9a
"PENANCE 0. 212
AR 01819ANCC Or THE CITY COOnCil or " r CST•. Or PASCNO
CUCMONCA. CALITORNIA. APPRDPINO IaO ,,rAL ARCA SPECIFIC IL1N
0QN21EYT 85 -02. L4MI90 THE LtTUSTBIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLLY
RCGAIDDr PARKIM STISDARDS MR PLSCIRCN R ClEi.CPSCif ASO
DMEYEATI90 INTERIOR BUTL,OlhG &PEAS THAT CAR RC DIDOCTC] FRM
PARKING RL901RCIEM.
NPER07, the Plaaily Cotataslen 4.34 a dull ad•,rtlled D4t: :t
❑early on July 24. 1985, 1e Order w <oe.id,r a.andira tS• tndustrlal +na
Specific Plan, add,
WHEREAS& the Planning Cootaatan did n<o =and a-'rnd Lh, �1•
Industrial Ana SDaotfte Plan ., DNV'.de far • paring ra -1a for naeart n!
4 ... loPeant um! •red deducttbl, area+ fro,, Darktng r•RAna,:a. and
NREBCO, the City Cotncll bald • 4471 adaertllad Public baarly Li
erdar to consider aaaMly the Industrial Ana SD•alfla Plan.
Wd. TREBIJONE. BE IT RPSOITEo, that •M :it, Caunctl of .he city Y.
43A!ho Cueaaeya does bane, ane4 the Iedua:rta! Ina Specific PIs, 13
fall...
SECTION Is That Park III• Table IIY -2 0-51 III -61, LAW Use yns
!:nt•:Ona • aaenGad :e G,!:n, Rea -arx, and Na•:oca,nt and .:
a- Daat•or +••
1, Haar, •,d Y••loo<•n•+ us" •1414 -d is •1, remin•
e,flg,. ..Y,...- d,e, op,,•n• amfor :•.':y or • prod.-t.
2. ..... ft a he, :opa,a- nrftrl Actilitt•s
to<kN. but rot :.P•e :at cal.dt<LU., :1D+a ..... all"
office me, •ta, e,3 -4m, .w ! ,loP,,,n• !a<ta•:as, duce
A' labs, a <>+•tral -14=9n ctenuan •aattrg :.Oder,
asst coxpat,r fa_-tla,a Such ads a-. •/pieaAl :aaa
t+t• s. than Dun office, but tore lntana, -he, tna :e : <iui
1nlmt11a1 ape,. ' - 'a" !a not ;rod -, odon, hole,•
v:traaee, or Nr• :w :a :ea unld u,,uld a!•an,ll affac>
uan 1a the sac. strut -." or on .h. .. Ott,• b.n 24
hours M -alt• aun,lllanoe la re,alary. a an :a.ar•a
natd,.Y =1 b, D.r:t:,d Jft., aDD. ->V,d tY a T >'Id3t :<IY.
7 Nr •,1e .n lnurae:url + a, a nL n Aatl•ltlb
pfadYna>n aw aaf•va.Y .Yratlona Mich L>elud, aaaa S 3 J
am off:e, apse,, •;roar.• aaa•DDIY roc $- a.,d >•mr
fa<ilttt,a 4.sc<tC,d of to 41B, Ndmlogy raeufactarty.
The .... Go act produt, coal• na :a,. rt!- a :1e,• or
pafticulat, Mac, •Null ad, ,3.1, affect UNa to th• 36"
a:NC•« e- Ol 'h, fa. al:• STar, 20 hour] CI.11 :•
aun•...an >• is o,<eamry, • caretee•r'a real }nee car ]+
Ganit•N uh•n fie :rood tF • CDhJtt"hal Oa• I'll'.
.a :J:, %) ae%a t- a,, •e tntl4aa naearc, .sd .ar,laD -+a: aaaa •L
- Cnluf : -la: Earrs , & w :,ban,al 31 Sndua :r :aL ca :gart•a as :eaonl
+hnaE! -1 t;
�X�81T e' 6 a' — TSPABS�'
93 7Y
Ordinance W. 2T2
Page 2
SECTIOB 31 That Section E.3 Partlnc Spade PlduinG (,,. 111 -20) 0.
el.hd.d to aaa :Yeawttan e, as follows:
1. Bea.anh 4 Oevelop",ta I apace par 350 Sauan Mt
SMr04 at That Section E.3, Parkin SPAC.. PwYlr,d Craig. • : }y>
be lT.d47d to add $YEteatloa f as foll0al@
f Follwlnd trier-or building an•a Can to dldutt.d !-aa :1•
onnll parking rpYindwtsi elwtrluli_wNniwl -ao��,
e leeator shafts, stAIM-112, wd wltt +story 10 -bier.
Br IT FUMES RMYrD, that the City Counoll !tad. -M` `•I,
ez"oddent will not Cause algnirtraat adv.r.. !apart. upon :h. •nvtronrm of
i»uw • B.daavv Orleratiw for this a ... daedt
SF.OTTOB St The Pll a sta,ll sign this Ordl.tnc. . %he City Tl.ra
shall ca . the sane to be weltshrd vIthl, flf:e.d (15) Qa,, I a
"soap At 1•a2t wce In The Datl Mp t, a n.espap,r of 6on.n1 atrcataao•
Publish" In the City of :ario. California. add clr lat.d in tr.. 't i or
None" Cucaaonp. C•llfowl•.
PASSID, &PPaOTm, Anal ICOPTEO this nth day of S.ot.sh.r, 1 -95
AYES, krlght. Du9a:, Yik43 Oahl, Sta;
ROES, Yon.
4DSLYT, Bon,
ATTEST,
F u:nelet. City ^.. •k
1, BWEBLT A. 4BTBrLCT C ^T CL1Pd of I..,, a! L:a`a C.tao'9a
611roraia, do Gene) Certify that .he rcr.going Ofdthan95 was to :wdYt.d a: a
ro"lar •eeaK of -he Cowell of the City of Rant» Cacasmga
21st day or 4Ypst, 985, and w finally Pass" at a "V.0 m.:t:d; a! •+
city Council or the City or FN=to Cut..." told on th. nth tai '+f Sw'.at•-'
,995.
Eie:Y•H •hl. 5th day of 51D:•Ch.r, 1995 at •wthd
caltrainla.
95/
oADISASCE to. 149
Ltl O[DISAACL Of = City COCsC.^. Or TP_ C::T :r ".,Cho
CUC11TSCl clurOAS :A. L VDISO PIA: I': :r :3L
IMST31AL Iflu sPLCIr :c PLA.r TO ES:ABUSI 1 h3;i: ACES"Js
OVE3LAT 313"IC: LCCATEO OS SCTH S: ".ES :r YA ; ^. ATL:tE
dETZ15 rCO:H „L LOOL"AAD &No an SAES.
The City C..,tl of the Clay of SNCMe
ar "ta as fallewn :ueaarr.cs :allf:".A. 4eaa
SECT :c t] The tellewln[ stollen Is tsreay adc.d to Par:
Daelo�ent ScNear4a Nd c,.d*l
P NAYItl 17M't :Y••_.. _.3`t•••
Pvrptae The Dwane of the Ovoria
eatael"d d.vle y Dtatrt<: to to
cats. etanarn whi" 4444..3 tee
]Ique setting Na W"et” or the Hall. Allow.
eer.._ar. The Aaron {venue Overlay D•. -auto: is
owed -n ..A the ..at a.1: •.at sills :• P.atfn
Arecwe ta:Naioa f" relent.. U.1 ... r3 acvth :e
ath Street, •a -town In r1gaY Yd.
Appllea4111!y The 0'.•:ay D"tr:.l :; to
C`n......n with t• G •PPlt.d Sn
are . S :.o :.•t J:N frr c sell 6
7 w Leer :" _ —r aCeea ae N•Jer
na• -ic :ba 4.1. - -.n: pone!... d"ty
atannr:a and tans we reslatt.. far eats
!uhar•aa 6 and l Top-Z t 3P.W. -call,
Covered by the Hawn {•Nw Cv.rlp DUtrirt .111
Cents.. to he [awa'nea by ••• regulations or the
Spetirie Plan. Cerele;=.h: a4:aeent to eG dares
Ar.nve overlay 0"tr : -: asap een.tt.r
the Clarity
G a•rtei :rrou� :ea Jatr a :- Proms.
SR::aa Har.n Ivnw to I.M.4 •ear ile _
ten: of the Clay ant will gad h, e
aid .f :Cant gateway lots ae tee neat
Mauer LSPVrtNt "peat BNero .c.acnPa.
of :re Aaron "ad" Carrico? to r.l• -tcnet tv.t =�
aster arter:ala G"les:ee " tl•.eial
gov:erarda• Hawn Arenw :a the
,- :a Ter the Clty and ta4 ore easor travel
end office Gereleplr: Potential for huge
at direct aeeua to the a tiny-- cCoolratton
the altPCrt ado toe
let era : - :• to fww.y wG Pr.lid" ce fare - Wrtwt:y to Q(tf a
eneaura a:n: Sdtanatre. Its ff. by
prof"-to "l d.wl.r -1,49 the off. C. .4.3
earr..an a •he Haven Lwow
"lae:cn to
Car.,.. Plan The CeNr.: Plan a - -s
Prrc•_°a•. •l o.•-s that trawl raw.., We
• .. _ a =tie •ry
.tea :<:a- Na reaC.a • • e]] .. • p1
tn. ON.ral Plat 1141.3 nrr.
tr is aecrafary to re: -�'r �aat t..t dealt
p rcept : :n of a row:• Th •.. C. or
eta: ne Ka..n 41.n_. 3p.Ct!. PIN sta :u
Par< eat•ror, arr•:rr and "a .r.4rt :tat
• 1 artw:4 A Nate; e4 to elect a
•eNpwa 13G leaae ter ftr_a awk3a[ N
attract Le bd Ple"adt .", .nH ...rat Ktn
high V-3ttde •live•.
�n 1BIT
-IC PP
Gre:rane• a0. 2.9
Pate 2
A. Cr41 Sta:r_en:
teals Y• itl:Y_ee:a :,A: Gaf:r• tp1
C=UAI -7'3 lfilr]:Irll am a:ap:lCOi. 7nI
V31 fcr the YAII. 1..... c :r:Lta tap -.to
fm 3*131. rttp tEa tndw: ^.il ._. ouatnev
er_uni:aa a�a 'It e tn• C::Y'a Qaeeed eia
app ntea v!!:::ala. Tnta dial ra;r•]m:a :M
Current evnpa.:an of Na !rture aaatratePN
far
no teat ,'•heat I :u C*-T Car the
Nnv Nan'. C. rrtGar.
o mro io v leoa.ravq• eater Plamea
,amt aloe,, the Wean Arrow mm...
.tam mmaPea Sumo Curaeoo`i•a taxi• q
PavRal¢i m inteattle. plan etttlitr
ptmr Into ADS CttT ma t7 gseot La., a
ILIAD lactire, attmct(v•, ma Dlaaame
ofrloe port at... Me" to a CePUS 11tI
"Anil nth 41,b "t" tamtIty.
8. Lana Jae Trev
Tn- Lat•n: ar tnr !a1LwL -.{ Polle:u
"C-w4 ae larva wu Ana C•rp:;=... e:v 4a:eM
ecr1. %he ems sal for -De Navan than•
r as an :n:Imlrq pas awl::T ptevar
Lot s the era:,ata•
E•t
'he 9rtmn land We f.otc::vo plco,
Narm AIInu• la LclenCed to Do or an
ar_t- :a:- Aar• /,rchaa::ul Ana effla•
maura• Ncvrrar, m the carC•la
.l to •actrt :i tCo r..... aa. tta
PLA,., f
rasa ; 1... 13uraf•l db.
duo;•:: Assume. of a CiveYtonal
Va. ". Par1t ma a fl I— that M1Cn a
w• rILL G tte213.:.t rl tE the Stated
amts foal fer NAVen ..... ad all
Dia•r:ct Drviaiam c the Dvrta/
8.2. SILICA mei lard a —Colal and hwtvaa
au PPart Service USIA amll no: UCHa
P1aMed SCI •lcor are In am Naater
:mtv;_mc. Canemtrat l:v of
Burn - I . mr hYtL::-
aero: !runty -r to nee "i er ale¢, the
c•r1::Ia.
E.3. ha !ollrvlei imp w• or;•. are
PI 1t: as or eonat::: ua117 D•r ::•d
DL3G•.a• to, / -1n teams. a ... I,.
• .. . I. urea -w he
r' —: a sea 3C:va• -tt L• Ica
ftrare:al, (: ::•
S•rr: cap Imwancl ! iv. tat to
Pro(•aa ✓rat 3•rrteq
li-fo: Atratbe Civic 3•..I..,
Cultural
Eva Anus 3u9SL7 Satall
3u e 3A1N t Arrtvi
Ewlova
ritln tP n .r.1 ...
8 m0(.rleeellal U,,.,93 .Mt,
LJ.SY FF
�/� e •
A :r I
Coda. L.cnal Uao Cenpn:rrc. Sale. 1 :or"
e.J
P.ntarta:rca>:
rood ala 2HCa't 34"s
Feat reed Saba
ND Gl /YOt.1
FrivNl S•rrtni
tr:reu un Ia<Sl:t:n
PualSa bae.a.y
Public Stilly 1 Ut L.lty 3 ... ipe
1-1410.2 Safe.n iy
rinctlur) Use. L_:td to Zes of tea
floor area >.r 5.2.
e a tale :era io•:ee. err aG•C::aal.r
..1,,o t (eta free
Craaluaa the Cread .. oC t »leac fnr
ataaa:ni fast food re.tawanta, one of
rewire
to %t r O'.ng l drlr..tEreuy1 fat...::e..
C•a:r:ot Xovarer. Cart
hca evu:0 :. Dar'•• tea as b aC::ary
Cr sace.aar) uta• doyens to a
onti:::aNl Uaa Ier.•:. as a Cat. of
lare.r Dre1•ct Dnrtdad, nw.•v, f.an
Yaa net
at •poi •a alra<t.y
Nivn 4nn n.
C. Yaat•r pl. e...: •La -:
]er tatrnt of it." "f"-o to to Ct -rter far
Sa :•Zra..d d.l,t- _.at rt tG .arlUat
pe»lal• tit• to too r4r:.Y P"C913 r r:up
toe Yaat.r Piai pree.a : -.H !a •DPar:u :y
to CvaiN:• to rff - -•a or atci:• er
ault:D.4 :r -;• -y erns -a are d:ara:ap
It or- o du.• >cp.nc PSNIlJ. Nat.r
Plarniat of N!::q meads Y:11 a•.Id
C.•aUCa.nt lead N a
oam.r vnlea N.r.at or Dred uaa !ut"4
d•r.le U t of dal aeon: p a.la Sa Lee Ge-
.3 f•aat0la. f :a to tic, or Lea
uaatar D1ar�:nD Froee.a to
At &it. t oa: CIttra
patgrN :o .tear. ea:EV, St :a
At ate•aDt to O:inr.r (realm 4 .10 teay
4•1.10 D, to all Yarn laa.e. Yeil4 of em be
salad, and :e tat. aanru ;r et eGPOr:udlLte.
Yeu. ee.r .nee r_. aemear93 and
NSCa ILa.l Yetn fade+ err antrad.d to aDDI)
to ell :raS.eta ua f.,U.j ..a be rytFa:n.d
i } •p t.e.. a alt. bcV c'ftra
C.1 4 <one, ptu: Yaa :•r plm aa,,: to
autaat :rd far planiln C `•
•oc".41 top :Gr I'm my
aN.•
odd,.. Hla:: ^.Y::a :e
o. .v caror.a vRr:a
to. Xaa:•r p:m
area
CITY OF RANCHO CL•CAY.O::CA
PART II — INITIAL ST.'DY
EM1YIRO:DCTAL CHECKLIST
APPLICANT:_ rily nF d i ft iL Y 64,
FILING DATr:_L' y
PROJECT LOCATI0:7:„
I E. \'VIR01':L --
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers at. required on attached
Explan
)
-� 98
YES HAYSE NO
1. Soils and Ceoaoev, Will the proposal have
signizicant result's in:
a, Unstable groundconditlons or in changes in
geologic relationships?
✓
b. Disruptions, displacement's, eocpactlon or
burial
_
of the soil?
c Change in topography or ground surface
/
contour intervals?
d• The destruction, covering or modification
Of
any unique geologic or physical features?
a• Any Potential increase in wind or watar
rosion
eite
Y
of Soils, affecting either on or off
s Conditona?
/
f Changes In erosion siltatlon, or deposition'
-- _
-K
R• Exposure of people or proparcy to geologic
hazards
such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
✓
h• An increase in the race of extraction and /or
--
use of any mineral resource'
2. HYdroluev, Will the proposal have significant
results in:
-� 98
Pa4a l
YES MAYBE \0
A- Changes In currants, or the course of direction
of flowing streams,
rivers, or ephemeral scream
channels?
`
b. Changes in absorption rates,
or the rate and amount of surface
runoff? later
✓
m. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters ?
/
V
d. Change in the Amount of surface water In anv
body of water?
v
A Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration
f
of surface water quality?
f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
✓
S. Change In the quantity of groundwacers,
either through direct
additions or with -
drawals, or through Interference with
A
aquifer? an
Quality?
nQuantity?
h. The reduct.an in the amount of water other-
wise available for
public water supplies?
i
I. Expos urn of people or property to water
re'•ced hazards
such as flooding or saichas?
L
3. Air Ou s111X, Will the proposal have significant
results
3n:
a. Canstant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect
G
sources?
V
0,
Stationary sources?
b. DeterloratiOn
of ambient air q „ality and /or
Interference with the attainment of applicable
air
quality standards?
C. Alteration of local or regions, climatic
—_
conditions, affecting air covrment, moisture
or temperature?
• 1,�
r
4. Biota
Y
�—
Flora L,!It rue p•oposrl have significant results
Sn
a. Change In the characteristics of species,
+ncluding dLversity, distribution, or number
of
any species of plants?
J
b, Reduction of the numbers of any uniu
u
or endangered species qo, rare
✓
of plants?
y^
3 -1c) ! /
?age 1
YES %,AYES \D
e Introd-:etlon of new or disruptive species of
plants into an arel?
d Reduction in the potential for agricultural
— --
prrduction?
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
In:
a Change In the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or numbers
Of any species of animal,?
b Reduction of the nu =bers of any unique, rare
or ensangered specie, of animal,?
✓
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
_- y
d Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
/
S. Pooular ion. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a Will the Proposal alter the location, dlstri-
butlon, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the hu=an population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demard for additional housing?
—_
6. Socio- Economic Patters. Will the proposal have
significant rnsults is:
a Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including econmic or
commercial diversity, tax race, and property
calmest
b. Will project to be equitably distributed
among project bennficfarles, i.e , buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7. Land Use and Planning Consideratlons. Will the
—_ ,[
proposal have sign if Stan[ results Sn'
A. A substantial alteration of the present or
✓
Planned land use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
Policies. or adopted plans of any governmental
entitles?
v
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
—
existing consumptive or non- consumptive
f
recreational opportunities?
page C
YES HAM NO
S. Transoortatlon. Will the proposal have s
significant
results in:
a Generation of substantial additional vehicular
rovevent?
--
b. existing streets, or de =and for
new et
nee street existruccion'
e Effects on existing parking facilities, or
Y!
demand for now parking?
V/
d. Substantial 1= ?act upon existing transporta-
--
/
tion system?
\/
e. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or rovicecnt of people and /or goods'
✓
f Alterations to or effects on present and
Potential eater -borne, rail, pass transit or
air traffic?
_
v
B Increases in traffic hazards to rotor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
y
9 Cultura_ 1� Res,urces. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and /or historical resources?
10. Health. Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
--X/
proposal have significant resulcs in:
a Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
f
C, A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
�_
substances In the event of an accident?
d. An Increase In the nu =ber of individuals
-� �t
or species of vector or pathenogenlc
organises or the expcsure of people to such
J
organism?
v
'
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
f
I. Exposure of people to
P potentially dangerous
noise love. s7
--
[y
B. The creation of objectionable odors?
J
*
h. An Increase in light or glare?
✓
7'
�-
Page 5
YES n;YSE NO
11. Aestbetics. Will the proppsal have significant
resu_ts
in:
a
The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view?
b
The creation of an aesthetically offensive
—_
/
site?
\/
C.
A conflict th the rs of designated
or potential l corridors? scenic corridors?
VIII,
12. Utiliciea and public Services. Will the proposal
— --
have a slgnlf scant aced for new systems, or
altefatlons
to the following:
a
Electric power?
b.
Natural or packaged Sea?
1/
C.
Communications systems?
d
Water supply?
✓
e.
Wastewater facilities?
f.
Flood control structures?
v
g.
Solid waste facilities?
✓
h.
Fire protection?
✓
1.
Police protection?
✓
J.
Schools?
k.
Parks or other recreational facilities?
✓
I.
Yalntenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities?
m.
Other gave rnmenrol services?
✓
13. Enerry and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant reaulto
a
Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
✓
b.
Substantial increase in demand upon existing
/
sparces of energy?
e
An increase in the demand for development of
—✓
/
new sources of energy?
�J
d.
An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
J
of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable source. of energy are available?
Pago 6
YES XAYSE NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
14. Handatory Fintines of Sitiifieance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species•
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal coounity •educe
the number or restrict the range of A rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the =Joe p
eriods of California liforrni a his tory or prehistory-
b.
Does the project have the potential to achieve
stinrt -term, to the disadvantage of long -torn,
ae ara=ontal goals? (A short -tern impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definic!vo period of time while long-
tam impacts will endure well into the future).
e. Does the project have impacts which are
Individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means ;hat the incremental effects of an
Individual project are considerable when viewed
In connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects). —_
d. Does the t have environmental effects -- l
which will l mac caLs sa substantial adverce effects vl
on h=an beings, either directly or indirectly?
II. DISCDSSI011 OF n-%,IAO :NE`TAL EVALDATTOV (i.e , of affirmAtive answers to
the above questions plus a discuation of proposed mitigation measures).
"a;. T
III. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
IX I find
the environta andjA SECA '.— ,`DEChL1RATI0Vivilliben
on =, prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect
In this case because the mitl;ation censures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A 4EGATIVS
DECLARATT04 WILL BE PREP.%RED.
❑I find the proposed project %y have a significant effect on the
envfrn =ntt. and an E%VIRO:"%T IXTACT REPORT is required
Date_ LE�
�lg a
Title /lam
-3--is' /DV
I
RESOLUTION NO. 85 -180
A RESOLUTION OF THE PUNNING COK41SSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALleORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -05 AMENDING THE
HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public
hearing to consider all comrerts on the proposed Industrial Specific Plan
Amendment No. 85 -05.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Commission hereby makes the
following - ni gs:
A. The Amendment is consistent with thi
General Plan, Industrial Specific
Avenue Overlay District.
B. The Amendment is warranted
inconsistency between Industrial
Subarea 6 Land Uses and Haven
District Land Uses.
Policies of the
Plan and Haven
to eliminate
Specific Plan
Avenue Overlay
C. The Amendment would not have a significant impact on
the environment.
SECTION 2: That the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
this amendm—en-t-w-M not create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on November 27, 1985.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED.
I. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Industrial Specific
Plan Amendment 85 -05 to add Research and
Development /Office to the Haven Avenue Overlay District
2. That a certified copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission
shall be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1985.
PLAY �" COMvISS,IIO.N{n�Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: AIVI Nn6'I
ennIS L. Stout, C aFaiiman
/0�
PLANNING C"ISSION( OLUTION
• IASP AMENDMENT 8S-05 l
November 27, 1985
Page 2
ATTEST: 61 45+
ra u er, Deputy Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of Noverber, 1995, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONtRS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, CNITIEA, BARKER, STONT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
/07
ORDINANCE NO. 249A
AN ORDINANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CAIIFORNiA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 85 -05 IN ADDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT/OFFICE
USE TO THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT BY AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 249
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does
nrdain as follows:
SECTION 1: Part Ill, Development Standards and Gu4dellnes is hereby
amended to read as follows:
V. HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT
B.3. The following land use types are permitted or
conditionally permitted within the Haven Avenue
Overlay District. All other uses shall be
prohibited.
Administrative and Office
Financial, Insurance, & Real Estate Services
Communication Services
Medical /Health Care Services
Professional Services
Administrative Civic Services
Cultural
Business Supply Retail Sales & Services
Business Support Services
Eating and Drinking E;tablishments
Research and Development /Office
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once to The
Dail., Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City—F
ntai• o, California, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, AP.'•ROY0, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
/09
Jon 0. Mikels, yor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA P tio'
STAFF REPORT +.
C
} }O p F
U 2
i
DATE: January 15, 1986 19"
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
b�O��IT4 Of RANCHO CUC NS - An amendment to ect on
of the Development Code pertaining to non-
conforming use.
1. BACKGROUND: The City Council directed staff to prepare an
amendment to the Development Code clarifying the regulations
pertaining to a change in non - conforming use. This proposed
amendment to the Development Code would establish a procedure
whereby the Planning Commission may consider a request to change a
non - conforming use to a different non - conforming use provided
certain criteria are met. Staff is recommending that a conditional
use permit process be established for the Planning Commission to
consider this type of request. The Planning Commission, at their
January 8, 1986, meeting, recommended approval of Development Code
Amendment 85 -06. The attached Planning Commission staff report
fully describes the proposed amendment.
11. RECOMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that City
oun-U approve the proposed amendment and issue a Negative
Declaration.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:OC:ko
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report, January 8, 1986
Resolution Recom•ending Approval
Ordinance
/d4
L
I
11
ABSTRACT: The City COOncil has directed staff to prepare an
amendment to the Developrc.t Code to clarify the regulations
Pertaining to a change in non - conforming use. The purpose of Chic
report is to explain the attached Ordinance amending Section
17.02.130 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures.
BACKGROUND: The Non - Conforming Uses and Structures section of the
OeveTopment Code is intended to limit the number and extent of non-
conforming uses by regulating tneir enlargement, their re-
establishment after abandonment, and the alteration or restoration
Of the structures they occupy. In addition, this section is
Intended t- limit the number and extent of non - conforming
structures r that would their being moved, altered, or enlarged
in the manner that Rrould increase the discrepancy between existing
conditions and the standards prescribed In the Development Code.
Section 7_02 130 D) states that �hnne,..._ _
v.w�,urnng a change of use to a use which is oft r new
y in terns of traffic, noise, density, Parkin greater
ght, etc., and that no alteration or reconstruction of the
irmtn9 structure would be permitted that would Increase the
//O ITEM N
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
C
STAFF REPORT
ry 8, 1986
�)
3.—
an and
F
Members of the Planning Comission
uller,
City Planner
tanner
leman,
Sento, Planner
MYEATAL
ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT
U rl - n amendment to ect on mi use t e eve opmeni Code pertaining to non-
L
I
11
ABSTRACT: The City COOncil has directed staff to prepare an
amendment to the Developrc.t Code to clarify the regulations
Pertaining to a change in non - conforming use. The purpose of Chic
report is to explain the attached Ordinance amending Section
17.02.130 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures.
BACKGROUND: The Non - Conforming Uses and Structures section of the
OeveTopment Code is intended to limit the number and extent of non-
conforming uses by regulating tneir enlargement, their re-
establishment after abandonment, and the alteration or restoration
Of the structures they occupy. In addition, this section is
Intended t- limit the number and extent of non - conforming
structures r that would their being moved, altered, or enlarged
in the manner that Rrould increase the discrepancy between existing
conditions and the standards prescribed In the Development Code.
Section 7_02 130 D) states that �hnne,..._ _
v.w�,urnng a change of use to a use which is oft r new
y in terns of traffic, noise, density, Parkin greater
ght, etc., and that no alteration or reconstruction of the
irmtn9 structure would be permitted that would Increase the
//O ITEM N
PLANNING COYNISSIOtI STAFF REPORT
Development Code Amendment 85 -06
January 8, 1985
Page 02
C
discrepancy between existing conditions and the current regul
for the district in which the structure is located.
Ili. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Part II of the
n t a toy an con -coded that the proposed amendment would not
create significant adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, staff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in
he a Re ort newspaper. To date, no correspondence either for
C- ala nst this proposed amendment has been received.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It i• recamoended that the Planning Commission
a opt— the attached resolution recommending approval of the proposed
amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City
Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Y
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DC:xo
I
Attachments: Initial Study 'art It
Ri olution
Ordinance
76/-A //
my
Cm of RANCRO CUCAXONOA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
n"VIRONMNTAL CNcCRLIST
FILING DATE:
f
/ Cep �aL
PROJECT LOCATION:
I ENYIRO :"3� ;7A_ •�I•pAC;S
Ilyplanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
aheecs).
1-1-3 i/a
YES YutY ° -C NO
1. Soils and Ceolaev. Will the proposal have
a:gn1: !cant rnaults In:
a Unstable ground conditionsor In changes in
geologic relationships?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
burial
of cho 3011?
C Change in topography or ground surface
contour Intervals?
d• The destruction, covering or codification
of
_.-L
any unique ge03oe4c or physical features?
/
e Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of :oils, affecting
either on or off
site condltons?
/
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or depoiltlon?
g• Exposure of people or property to 1•ologlc
hazards
—_
such as earthquakes• landslidai, cud.
slides, ground failure,
or dollar hazards?
h. An Increase In the rate of extraction and /0r
use of
C
any mineral resour:e?
/
2. Nvdroloev. Will the proposal have significant
results In:
1-1-3 i/a
•l C
. page
2
YES Y_tY9E ?_0
a. Changes In currents, or the course of direction
Of flowing streams,
C
rivers, o
channels? r ephemeral scream
r
b. Changes In absorption
races, dr-.nage patterns,
or the rata and amount of surf
runoff? co water
1
r. Alterations to the course o flaw of flood
d Change
In the amount of s, •
-o water in any
body of water? .
e. Discharge Into surface vat rs, or any
7/
alcerar ,n of surface water t� alt[v.
I. Alec rat :on of groundwater characteristics,
E rhango in the quantity of gcoundwaters,
either through direct
'-
additions or with-
drawals, or through interference
aquifer? with an
Quality?
Quantity?
h. Tha reduction in the amount of water other
visa available for
— L
'+
public water supplies?
/
1. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards
such as flooding or selchas?
/
3. Air Ouallty.
raaul 17111 the proposal have significant
[s ins
—• -L
a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobil,
or Indirect
sources?
Etationary sources?
/
b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
Interference
with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
e. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting
_— -F/
air movement, moisture
or campc taco rot
4.
- 1
gtata
-
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a• Change to the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or number
If any rpecfes of plants?
b• Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of any
.1.1- v' 113 - - /
. r r
r e Introducticn of new or diar ptive species o£
l plants taco an area'?
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
produc:1on?
Fauna. Will the proposal htva significant results
In:
C
a. Change in the ch,racterls,lca cf species,
Including dlversi y, distribution, or numbers
Of -" species of animals?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of ani =ila?
t. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result !a a barrier
to the migration or movement of ani=als?
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
5. Peculation. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal altar the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rato of
the husan population of an -.0s?
b, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
traits a demand for additional housing?
6, SOt10- ScOneaic Factors. Will the proposal have
sigma! leant results in:
a. Change in )otal or regional sotto- eco.,omie
characteristics, includ Ing economic at
commercial divetsity, tax rate, and pro —rty
va ues?
b, Will project cotts be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, 1 0 ,buyers,
tax payers or proj0et users?
7. Land Use and Plannlns Consideratf ons '7111 the
proposal have signet itant results in!
a. A substantial alto ration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
b. A con Met with any designations, ob'oetives.
p011e1es, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
C, An Impact upon the qulaiey or quantity of
existing consultive or non - consumptive
recreational opportuniti.e?
, -s fjq
?age ]
YES wAySr__0
l
� r
i page C
g Transoortatlon V YES
rasa, cs 1� ill Cho proposal have slgnifltanc
a Ceneratfon of substantial tional vehicular
covement? addi /
b Effects on rxlst ing streets, or demand for
new street construction' /
C. Effects on existing Parking facilities, or --
demand for new ParLing? /
d Substantial icPact upon
'ion systems ? existing transport,-
e. Alterations to present Patterns of circula- /
Clan or eovemenc of people and /or goods? — 1
f, Alterations to or effects on present and
Potcltial water- borne, rail, ea a
rs erasic or
air [:attic? /
g Increases In traffic
bicyclists or ptdtstr hazards to ea toz vehicles,
lans?
9 Cultural 3 ge =tes 11 I 11 the proposal have C
slgn.ticant results in:
a. A dis a•rbaneo to the integrity of archaeological,
paloo-tological, and /or historical resources?
30. Neal ;h, Saftty and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in:
s. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _
C. A risk of explosion or relea c Of substances In the event of au accident?
doua
d. An Sncroase in the number of Individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people co such
organisms?
e. Increase in existing noise levels? /
f. Exposure of people to Potentially dangerous
noise levels? /
8. The creation of objectionable odor,? /
h, An increase In light or glare? _—
C
Page
S
—YES :AYgE v0
11 Aesthetits. Will the proposal have significant
resu,cs in:
a The obstrucc!on or degradation of
vista or view? any scenic
—_
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
C. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
12. Ut!liti -s and Public Services. Uill the proposal
have
~[
a slgnlfieant aced for new systems, or
alterations to the follcving.
a. Electric Power?
b. Natural or packaged gar?
/
c. Communications syst..?
/
d. Water supply?
e. WAstevater facilities?
f. Flood control truetures?
/
g. Solid Waste facilities?
h. Fire protection?
—
1. Police protection?
/
J- Schools?
k. Parka or other recreational facilities?
_ /
1. ?ltintanance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control faellitles?
m. Other governmental services?
--
17. Enerev and Scarce Reseurcei. will the proposal
have
signi[leant results in:
a. Use of substantial or excassite fuel or onargy?
b. Substantial Increase In demand upon existing
_
sources of energy?
C. An Increase in the demand for development of
—
new sources of energy?
d. M increase or perpetuation of the consumption
--'[
of non - renewable forms of energy. when feasible
renewable
sources of energy are available?
f Page, 6
a Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
14. Mandator, Ftn'_Snas of Slelfflcance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the qua_1ty of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife popula tlon to drop
belw self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal coaunity. reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
Important eratn"Os of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -rem, to the disadvantage of long -tet ,,.
enviran_ental goals? (A short -term 1mP3ct on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well Into the future).
I- Does the project have impact• which are
Individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the Incremental effects of an
Individual project are considerable when viewed
In connection vlth the effoc cc of pas[ projects,
and probable future projects)
d. Does the project have environ mental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human belugs, either directly or indirectly?
YES `..1Yge YO
/(
7z
—71
II. DISCUSSI0:7 OF E\'YIRO%;1Lr ?7AL EVALUATIO ?7 (i.e.. of affirm uas [io native ansvor7y�
[he above qns plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
H- 8 //7
C
C C Pose 7
III DE7- RMI3ATIO11
On t basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COL'IJ `70T have a significant effect
an the environ_ent, and a b'LOAIIii DECLLUTI0:1 v11,
be prepared
I find thnt although the Proposed project could haie a significant
effect on the environ one, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A BECATIVE
DECLARATIM WILL RE PR_PARED
EDI find the proposed project ,w,
envirr�ont, and an
Date
C
hl 9 //8
C
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COK41SSION
RECOI0IENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85 -06
AMENDING SECTION 17.02.130, OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PERTAINING TO NON - CONFORMING
USE
WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds it necessary to clarify and
revise the Development Coda regulations pertaining to the discontinuation of
non - conforming use.
SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds that the
proposed ev0— 'Topent Code Amendment 85 -06 Is an implementation of the General
Plan goals and pollr.les and that the General Plan Environmental Impact report
adequately covers any potential significant adverse Impacts. Further, the
PlannIng
impact repor
t iIs required spursuant Oto Division 13, Chapter T 6 Sectionr21166tof
the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds:
No substantial changes are proposed to any goals or
Policies which would require majo- revisions to the
EIR
No substantial changes have occurred with respect to
the circumstances under which the project 1s being
undertaken.
C. No new information on the project has become
available.
SEC'In4 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this pro ect w,Tnot create a significant adverse Impact on the environment
and recommends issuance of a Ne;ative Declaration on January 8, 1986.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11 RESOLVED:
1 That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends that the City Council approve and adopt
the attached Ordinance amending Title 17,
Development Code, Section 17.02.130, of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code
2. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission
shall be forwarded to the City Council.
W- /O //
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1906.
PLANNING COMMISStON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIMMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Cha rman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary
I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 8th day of January, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
tb/-// /1�6
C
9
ORDINANCE NO ;)25
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMNGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, SECTION
17.02.130 OF THE JEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING NON-
CONFORMING USE
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows.
SECTION 1: That Section 17.02.130 is hereby amended to -ead as
follows:
Section 17.02.130 Ron- Confor•ino Uses 6 Structures
A. Purpose. This section is intended to limit the number and extent of
non - conforming uses by regulating their enlargement, their
reestablishment after abandonment, and the alteration or restoration
after destruction of the structures they occupy. In addition, this
section 1s intended to limit the number and extent of non - conforming
structures by prohibiting their being moved, altered, or enlarged in
a manner that would increase the discrepancy between existing
conditions and the standards presrrioed in this Code.
D. Continuation and Maintenance
i. A use lawfully occupying a structure or a site, that does not
conform with the use regulations or the site area regulations for
the district In which the use Is located shall be deemed to be a
non - conforming use and cay be continued, except as otherwise
limited in this Section
2. A structure, lawfully occupying a site, that does not conform
with the standards for front yard, side yards, rear yard, height,
coverage, distances between structures, and parking facilities
for the district in which the structure is located, shall be
deemed to be a non - conforming structure and may be used and
maintained, except as limited in this Section.
3. Routine maintenance and repairs may be performed an a non-
conforming use or structure.
l Alterations and Additions to Non - Conforming Uses and Structures
1 No non - conforming use shall be enlarged or extended in such a way
as to occupy any psrt of the structure or site or any other
structure or site which it did not occupv at the time It became a
non - conforming use, or in such a way as to displace any
conforming use occupying a structure or site, except as permitted
in this Section
C_:�L/
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85 -06
January 8, 1986
Psge 2
2 No non - conforming structure shall be altered or reconstructed so
as to increase the discrepancy between existing conditions and
the standards for front yard, side yards, rear yard, height of
structures, distances between structures and parking facilities
as prescribed in the regulations for the district in which the
structure is located
D. Discontinuation of Non- Conformin Use. Whenever a non- conforming use
as been Changed to a conforming use or has been discontinued for a
continuous period of 180 days or more, the non - conforming use shall
not be reestablished, and the use of the structure or site thereafter
shall be in conformity with the regulations for the district in which
it 1s located, provided that this section shall not apply to non-
conforming dwelling units. Discontinuation shall include termination
of a use regardless of intent to resume the use.
/ E. Chan ao�f Non- Conformin Use. The Planning Low ission myy consider
tow ( and approvr., or connitionaily approve, a request to change a non-
conforming iJ conforming use to a different non-conforsing use, provided that 1)
f+- there traffic,cennol e. density, parking demand, not odor, light), and Intensity 3)
said use implies with the provisions of Section 17.02.13002, subject
to a Conditional Use Permit as specified in Section 17.04.030.
Restoration of a Damaged Structure
Whenever a structure which does not comply with the standards for
front yard, side yards, rear yard, height of structures,
distances between structures and parking facilities as prescribed
in the regulations for the district to which the structure Is
located, or the use of which does not conform with the
regulations for the district In which it is located, is destroyed
by fire or other calamity, by act of God, or by the public enemy
to the extent of 50 percent or less, the structure may be
restored and the non - conforming use may be resumed, provided that
restoration is stsrted within one year and diligently pursued to
completion. When the destruction exceeds 50 percent of the
structure is voluntarily razed or is required by law to be razed,
the structure shall not '•„ estored except in full conformity
with the regulations for the district in which it is located and
the non - conforming use shall not be resumed.
The extent of damage or partial destruction shall be based upon
the ratio of the estimated cost of restoring the structure to its
condition prier to such damage or partial destruction to the
estimated cost of duplicating the entire structure as it existed
prior thereto. Estimates for this purpose shall be made by or
shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and shall
be based on the minimum cost of construction in compliance with
the Building Code.
G. City Planner. Any request for alteration, expansion or restoration
0 of non- conforming use or structure shall be reviewed by the City
Planner to determine compliance with the provisions contained in this
/ ;,L Z-1
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85-06
January 8, 1986
Page 3
section, or refer it to the Planning Commission as specified in
Section 17.02.130 -G. The City Planner shall notify the applicant and
surrounding property owners of the decision. The decision of the
City Planner may be appealed by any aggrieved party within * -1 (10;
calendar days of the decision.
M. Planning Commission Review. The Planning Commission shall conduct a
pu c ear ngi pursuant to Section 17.02.110. The Planning
Commission shall review each case and all matters of fact. The
Commission may grant the request, grant thi request with
modification, or deny the request. The Commission shall state that
the request will or will not be detri <n`al to the goals and
objectives of the General Plan and that su.h relues, will or will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties or imoro%ements in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: The City Council finds that Development Code Amendment
85 -06 is aTlamentatien of the General Plan goals and policies and that the
General Plan Environmental Impact Report adequately covers any potential
significant adverse impacts. Further, the City Council finds that no
subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to
Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code.
Specifically, the City Council finds that:
A. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or
policies which would require major revisions to the EIR.
B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the
circumstances under which the project is being
undertaken.
C. No new information on the project has becomr, available
SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for this
Developme—nt—ToRe--knendment, based upon the completion and findings of the
Initial Study.
SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause tame to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Dail , a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Untario, t;alifornia, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucanonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19*
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
1a-3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCATtONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 15, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AMENDIIENT _ Proposed
endments to hapters an
am of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Lode pertaining to the preservation of
trees on private property.
I. BACKGROUND: At their meeting of December 4, 1985, the City Council
cant nued first reading of this item to tonight's agenda The
Council directed Staff to prepare significant revisions to the
proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance Amendment.
The Council directed staff to separate the process whereby resident
can remove a tree from the process for a developer where a
subdivision is involved. Further, Council desired to establish a
preservation policy and only allow removal and replacement where
absolutely necessary because of disease, safety hazard or along
public roadways.
II RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council continue
the pub is hearing on this item to the February 5, 1986 agenda in
order to allow staff additional time to prepare the revisions.
Respectfully submitted,
64ele�'
Brad Buller
City Planner
88 :DC:ns
/.;,I/
January 8, 1986
Clly of Rancho Cucamonga
Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
To whnm It may concern
This letter is being presented to you to order that we mav
request an agenda Item be set aside for the Cucamonga Citizen's
Coalition for the nest City Counsel Meeting. January 15 1986
We wish to discuss the Petition and the Initiative for Taxpayer's
Right to Vote issue
If /yy000u'% need any further Information please call (714) 980 -7093
f [�
ohul R N ey
alrman
Cucamonga C.11zwn Coalition - PAC
NRN /mm
/1;�S-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCATiONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 10, 1986
T0: City Manager end City Council - /-
nom: Mar ''
Mark Lorimer, Administrative Analyst � °� -
SUBJECTt $ c X11 hi Ada ciao
par your consideration, staff has researched the process vbereby the City could
establish + non- profit foundation. The information provided below outlines the
purpose of the foundation, the process in establishing the organization, the
necessary creation of the foundation board, and the estimated costs for con-
sulting services.
2p11 of Fe.ndatien
Many cities throughout California have established non- profit foundations an a
metbanism for generating funds from the community to provide a variety of
projects vbicb could not have been provided without the participation of the
foundation. These projects have included the free City Cultural Center and the
construction of two fire stations in the City of Laguna Beach.
�R�eee to eat bli h the
Should the City Council direct staff to pursue the creation of the non- profit
foundation, state and federal tax exempt status must be obtained. It will also
be necessary to apply to the Secretary of the State for status an a California
non- profit foundation. Specifically, the process vould be as follows:
• Application to the Secretary of State for foundation status.
• Application to the State Tax Franchise Board for tax eaempt status.
• Application to the Internal Revenue Servica for tax ezemp: status.
The City Hoot obtain state status before applying to the IRS.
• Organize foundation structure and administration - create by -Iwo.
•• Establish the mecbership of the foundation board of directors.
The entire time period to establish the foundation is estimated at 3 -6 months
from On date of application to the State for foundation status.
/a(0
City Council
January 10, 1986
Page 2
Creating the Beard
The decision- making body of the foundation is generally a tbree /five member
board of directors appointed by the Ciy. Thera are many alternatives to cre-
atiog the membership of the fouodation board. In soma cities, the foundation
board is composed of five members, one member appointed by each of the City
Council members. to this case, the terms of the board members generally coiu-
cide with the terms of the councilmabors appoiotiog the bnard =where. The
actual membership of the board of directors, though, could be created in any
way the City Council chooses.
Commqlting arrvleca
In order to establish the non - profit foaedatian it may be advantageous to con-
tract for consulting services. Staff has not with Mr. John Francis, to attor-
ney epecialixieg in creatiog con - profit foundations in cities. Mr. Francis
estimates that costs to create the foundation would near 92,000. These ser-
viees would include completing all applications, conferring with local, state
and federal officials to obtain tax - exempt and foundation status, all filing
fees of approximately 9100.009 creatiog the foundation by -laws, establishing
the board of directors, paralegal services required to create the necessary
documents, and additional legal advice as needed. Depending on the number of
public meetings the consultant would be required to attend, Mr. Francis
estimates that completion of the foundation could require up to 20 hours of
consulting services and IS hours of paralegal services.
Attached for your reference is a latter from Mr Francis outlining further the
process and requirements for establishing a California Mon - Profit Foundation.
Should the City Council wish additional information regarding this matter,
please contact we at your convenience.
/ML
/ c31-7
JOHN W FRANCIS
••ow..c..• uw
ao • . . •r o,
u Hs +. u�noww.�aoem
mo.o.a a•a�so• e+
January 8, 1986
Mr. Mork Lorimar
Administrative Analyst
City of Ranche Cucamonga
P. O. BOX 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91710
RE: City of Rancho Cucamonga Foundation
Dear Mark:
As a follow -L.1) to our telephone conversation today, let me put
into writing the = rguontial steps for the dovelopment of n city -
related nonprofit corporation and the rnngo of costs for legal
services that would be associated with such an endeavor.
While incorporation may be accomplished separate from and in
advance of State tax exemption; typically those two processes are
accomplished as a single endeavor.
Once tha City Counci♦ gives the appropriate go- ahead, the
preparation of the materials for submission to the office of the
Secretary or State and the Franchise Ta,: Board take about a week.
There are some materials that you or Lauren •-'•1 need to help me
prepare; but much of what is submitted will be my work product.
It takes 6 -8 weeks for the Franchise Tax Board to orovido the
incorporation process status
ss iscompletedtas soon ias the Franchise Tax
Board notifies the Secretary of State that the organization is
tax exempt.
Following the State procosses, application is made to the In-
ternal Revenue Service far Federal tax exemption. The prepara-
tion of the application and accompanying documents again., takes
about a week after certain information is provided by you or
Lauren. :hs IRS takes 0 -10 weeks to issue the exemption letter.
Anytime after the incorporation process is complete ,either
before or after the Federal oxemption is granted) the
organizational meeting of the Foundation will be held I will
conduct the meeting.
/1;�6
Mr. Hark Lorimor
January 8, 1986
Page Tiro
As 1 indicated there ero two components of the costs for the
full array of activities outlined above. For secretarial
services, I pay a legal assistant at the rate of $2o an hour.
For my services I charge $l0o an hour. Typically it requires 10-
15 hours for each of us t) perform all required services. The
range of costa, then, wituld be between $1,200 and $1,800. I
would be willing to ident.fy a "not to exceed" figure of $2,000
if that would serve some purpose for you or the Council.
Finally, the filing fees fcr incorporation and tax exemption are
less than 150 total.
Please let me know how you wish to proceed with this project.
very ltruly :yours,,
at Law
O
P.3: I will be out of town on business during the week of
January 13 -17.
/a9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONCA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 15, 1986
T0: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
SUBJECT: Request to Appear at City Council Meeting
Mr. John Holt, a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, has requested time to address
the City Couccil this ewsning. Mr. Holt has requested that he be placed on
the Ageods after item 6A and before consideration of item 63.
While I indicated that normally the City Council does not encourage
off - agenda items bin request would be submitted to the Council and at your
discretion will be dealt with accordingly.
LMW:Laa
CI7Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �S cA ^'etc
MEMORANDUM
A
Z
Dates January iS, 1996 '1 >
1977 I
To, Mawr and City Council
Prom, Charles J. Pumet II, Councilman
S,d+tect, Penrho Cucamonga Cultural Center... A Focusing Process
An we each know, the idea of a Cultural Center in Rancho Cucamonga is
really generating a lot of positive interest and enthusiasm. I have been
contacted, as I'm sure you have, by a number of people wanting to know how
they can become involved and contribute toward this meaningful undertakings
I find, however, when talking to these individuals that each has a
different vision or understanding of what the Cultural Center in to be... a
theater for the performing arts... a gallery and museum... a multi- purpose
community building.
As this is to be integral part of our new civic center complex, it my be
appropriate early on to begin focusing on just what is envisioned in our
Cultural Center, that 1e, a specific focusing on whet types of
opportunities we as a community war, this facility to provide to us.
I would propose that a select 'Blue Ribbon' committee, made up of
Interested leaders from business, industry and the community at large. be
invited to begin the focusing process. This committee could over a period
Of four to five sessions distill a cogent idea of what the Rancho Cucamonga
Cultural Center could ta.
To provide design continuity with the other elements of Civic Center,and to
give guidance as to what is physically possible given the existing site
constraints, it would be helpful for the committee to have Duke Oakley
available as a technical resource, along with several of our staff who
could handle logistics.
This committee could also nerve as a useful springboard -or the Cultural
Foundation so when indeed it is formed it can 'hit the ground ruining'.
If the Council concurs with this proposal, I would like to volunteer my
time to work with staff In getting this first mooting together for this
exciting project as noon as possible.
Thank you.
CBsks
CITY OF RANCHO CUCOIONGA Lt 44 ppli
MEMORANDUM
Date, January 10 r 1986 >
197'
Tor Mayor and City Council
,r
J
Prom, Charles J. Buquat ZI, Councllmep
Subject, Rancho Cucamonga Library Services
Requested Council Business Item - January 15, t986
The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors on January 6 requested that
a study be undertaken by County Staff regarding current and future County
library services In Ranchc Cucamonga. It was also requested that a portion
of that study address the fessabilLty of the City becoming more directly
involved in the provision of the services within Rancho Cucamonga.
It may be appropriate that the City offer to become Involved in such a
study so that we may provide currant and projected infonatlon regarding
our community and it demographics. Through our direct participation and by
workinq together with the County on thts project, I feel we will achieve a
more viable long term result for our community.
If the Council concurs with this view, I %Vold ask that the City contact
the County, express our interest in the study and offer our services
towards itra sucessful completion.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
CB,ks