Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/03/20 - Agenda PacketQIY OF CrfY ODUUMM AGENDA Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line goad Rancho Cucamonga, California All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deaAliue for subnimting these items in 5t00 p.aa on the Wedsa,day prior to the seating. The City Clerk's Office recaives all such items. A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Boll Cells Wright Buquet _, Mikels Dahl _, and Ring _. C. Approval of Minutes: February 5, 1986 „u 14 r A. Wednesday, March 26, 1986 - 7:00 p•v - PLMNIIG COMMISSIOS - Lions Park Commmity Center, 9161 Baso Line goad. B. Thursday, March 27, 1986 - 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. City Council Meeting -2- March 20, 1986 The following Consent Calendar it,,,, are expected to be routine and non - Controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at ons fir without discussing. A. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 7 -19 -86 and 1 Payroll ending 3-6 -86 for the total anouut of 9813.070.52. B. Approval to receive and file Current Investment 7 Schedule as of North 12, 1986- C. Approval to forward Claim (CL86-14) against the City by to John M. Hernandez for automobile damage on C&Tneliga, to insurance Carrier. D. Approval to toward Claim (CL86 -I5) against the City by 16 Scott S. Cummings for automobile damage at Archibald and Tryon, to insurance carrier. E. Approval of Consent and Common Use Agreement No. VA (CO 17 86 -13) 18512 with County Flood Control District within a portion of the Alt+ Love Sonia No. 2. H. Approval of Professional Services Agreement (CO 86 -14) 23 with Carter Associates , Inc. for the development and implementation of a (Pilot Program) Paveoent Management Systems for the City of Reach* Cucamonga, for the amount of $22,050.00 to be paid from Gas Tax Funds. C. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Imptowement 59 Security for Treat 11606 and -2 thru -4 lccated on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad and bordering the want side of Deer Crash submitted by Clcofed Development Corporation, a California corporation and Grope Development. RESCLCTIOW N0. 86 -62 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.wOdGA, CALIFORNIA, APPNCPISC IHYRO72MENT AGREEMENT, I4PRO7CIENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NOS. 11606 AND -2 ISRU -4 H. Approval of Iaprwaaeat Agreement and Inrovevaoc 75 Security for CUP 85 -14, located on the northwest Corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue, submitted by The gullet Company. r City Council Meeting -3- March 20, 1986 RESOLUTION 50. 86-63 82 A RESOLUTION OV THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1!ONCA, CALIFORNIA. APPR09ING IMPROVEMENT ICRBEMERT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR COP 85 -14 I. Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement and 83 Impovemet Security for Tract No. 11781, located on the vest aide of Hermv Avenue between 19tb Street and Highland Avenue subm: tted by Roy E. Daly Coostruetion. Inc. RESOLITION 80. 86-64 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EIrnsios AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 80. 11781 J. Approval of street name change in Terra Vista Planned 86 Community from Dorado Court to Eldorado Court. The street was inadvertently signed Eldorado Court when built. The residents aw living on this acv street and safety personnel are unaware of the legal name of the subdivision map being Dorado Court. RESOLUTION 90. 86-55 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANCBO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. FINDING THAT THE BAHR OF A STREET SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH HEREINAFTER SHOULD BE CHANCED AND DESICHATIHC A NEW NAME POR NATO STREET E. Release of Bonds and Norice of Completion 92 Lf erode Prmoertr Co. - D.Q. E4 -02 - legated ..g liQi hearer Ave_ at Rth fits Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $140,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 86-66 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVESIENTS FOR D. R. 84 -02 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE City Council Meetiog -4- Match 20, 1986 L. Approval of Parcel Map 9670, located on the northwest 95 corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue submitted by Santa Anita Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 86-67 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOBCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9670 ( TENTATI7E PARCEL MAP 9670) M. Approval of Parcel Map %12, located on Foothill 98 Boulevard between Havea and Aspen Avenues submitted by Barton Development Company. RESOLUTION 90. 86-68 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9612 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 9612) M. Approval to purchase controltsr assemblies for 1985 -86 101 tr -ffic sigoal project@. Purchase of these item separate from the signal construction projects will provide better quality control and more economy. Estimated cost is 952,004 00 from Cu Taa and System Development Fucds. 0. Approval of persoonel modifications within the 102 Community Development Department. P. Approval of Transfer of Residential Refuse Collection 103 Permit in Service Area One to Yukon Disposal Service. Q. Approval to release Certificate of Deposit (Model Rome) 105 in the amount of $2,500 for Lots 7 and 8 (10265 and 10275 Riog Street) of Tract 9472. R. Approval to awnd the Laud Use Hap of the General Plan 107 from Low Density Residential (1-4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land located on the south side of Peron Boulevard, east of Archibald - APR 209 -055 -02, 03, 14. City Council Meeciog _5_ March 20, 1986 119 RESOLUTION D0. 86-69 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY CALIPONCIL OFA THE EOCITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-OIA - HAWIINS REQUESIING AE AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OE TEN GENERAL ELAN FROM LOW DENbITT RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DO /AC) TO LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DO /AC1 FOR 13.55 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THRUM BOULEVARD EAST OF ARCEIBA'.D - An 209 -055 -02, 03 6 14 S. Approval of eseeutim of comtssec documents (CO 86-15) 120 for Turner venom Corporation awarded aon Marproject 9d6.lw Diddar, T. Approval of Asseasoaut Districts update; Professional !46 Service Agreement from Ylllden Associates for Bello -Ross Community Facilities District Ro. 84 -1 ;CO 66 -16); Alta Lome Channel 84-2 (CO 66 -a7), and 83 -PD Park and Recreation Assessment District for fiscal year 1986 -87. A. a7RELt net gflLwAOnINO NOAD awn O_G20fliA �n CNEflGH AYZM 166 OEDIBAECE E0. 289 (second reeding) AN OEDImaC3 OF TH7. CITY COUNCIL OP TEE CITY OF EARCHO CUCAMOEGA, CALIFORNIA- AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF TEE gABCEO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COW RIGAIDING PRIMA FACIA SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STRIETS 168 E. smmu D�TELOPMOS BLDCC Gaeat fCOBC1 PRB.I)17d�12 Tds7 OP -ITi ®!EG7IV L9 CO naidaration Of projects to be fundad uadar the Fadaral Coamnity Development Block Grant Program for the tvalfth total ) Year- I aDPr"imatelY 33 0,000t of n granttfunds. have a City Council Neatiog -6- March 20, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -70 175 A RESULUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THR CITY OF RAtCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARI STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK 'RANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986 -87 C. ENVIRONMENTAL AS9PgSHE9T NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF DETERwIMATION FOR HHEKATION BA —I. COKKONIIT 178 FACILITIES DISTRICT P,4 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) - Environmental Assessment findings mod approval of Negative Declaration for territory between Highland and Banyan and between Rochester and Milliken. D. AHNEIAT ON NO. Nf, -1_(C BIN PLANNED omKoNTTY) TO COMMOMTTT FACTLITTPS DISTRICT (DAY 195 84 -1 CREEK DRAINAGE SYSIEyl, - Boundary of proposed annesen area is between Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the North and South; between Rochester and Milliken on the East and Nest. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -71 199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND PASSING UPON PROTESTS RESOLUTION NO. 86 -72 201 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA8CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO AN [MISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND AUTROSIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIYIZD ELECTORS E. EIIVIHOIIN@17 r. WI 11:11X NDEN n PLAN AMENDMINT 207 95 -044H . _P48LSA - A request to amead the Cameral Plan Land Use Nap from Medium Residential (4 -14 du /sc) to Office (in toojunction with the development of a senior eitireu congregate living and cars facility) on 4.85 acres of land located on the south side of foothill Baul evard, was* side of Cucamonga Creek, vest of Vineyard Avenue - APIA 208 - 211 -20 6 21 (Continued from 12/4/85 mating). City Council Meeting -7- March 20, 1960 RESOLUTION N0. 86 -73 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DENYING UISHOUT PREIUDICE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -04B. PORLSA. A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO IEE GENERAL FLAY LARD USE YAP PRO4 MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -14 DU /AC) TO OFFICE ON 4.85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOIHILL BOULEVARD, VEST SIDE OF CUCAMONGA CREEK. NEST OF VINEYARD AYEHUE - AIR 208 - 211 -20. 21 F. Ej$jROWMEN� TAL ASSESSMENT A D DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS 207 AMEMDMWj NS -07 - FOALSA - A request to &mead the Development Districts Map from MediUL Residential (8-14 du/ac) to Office /Professional (in conjunction with the development of a senior citizen congregate living and care facility) on 4.85 acres of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, vest side of Cucamonga Creek, wort of Vineyard Avenue - AM 208- 211 -20, 21. .v. , A. AB ORDINANCE A4ENDiNO THE AANCRO -0 _&MA MONICIM 244 ,MZ PERTAINING To TER DCR AND SALE OF SAFE AND SWE FIREWORKS - Consideration of ameadmeLts to the City's Fireworks Ordinance as directed by the Jity Council and proposed by the Rancho Cucamouga Fireworks Task Force. ORDINANCE NO. 78B (first reading) 245 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCh CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 Of THE RANCSO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL. CODE PERTAINING TO THE USE AND SALE OF SAFE AND SANE PIRIWORTS A. ffi(gTER'a RIDGE SPECIFIC P!At - CITT OF FONTANA - City 248 Council review of land use alternatives for the Ranter's Ridge Specific Plan on 567.6 acres of laud vithin be City of Fontana, located on the north side of Suauit Avenue, east of San Sevaiee Creek, vest of Devore Freeway. City Council Meeting —8— March 20, 1986 B. CONSuLTANT CONJUCT (CO 86—IS) — FOOTBILj BOO6EVARn 277 SPECIFIC PLAN AND E1VIRONMEN7 I. ASS SS= — City Council Approval of the consultant contract for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment. C. RRSOLUTIOR APPROVING REPORT OF ENGINEER AND GOEFIRMIRC 352 REASSESSMENTS. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TScnaMCC _ff ■(RIDS. SESOLUTIOE ACCEPTING PURCHASE ArREENOT. NOTICE OF REASSESSMENT — (CO 86 -19) (CO 86 -20). RESOLUTION NO. 86 -74 374 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVIEC REFUNDIRG AND REASSESSMENT REPORI OF ENGINEER AND CONFIRMING REASSESSMENT^ FOR REFUNDING BONDS IS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION 30. 86 -75 377 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE It -UARCE OF REFUNDING BONDS PURSUANT TO THE ^REFUNDING ACT OF 1984 FOR 1415 IMPROVEMENT ACT BONDS' RESOLUTION NO. 86 -76 388 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. MAKING ARARD FOR SALE OF REFUNDING BONDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND A. Consideration of a mastic& date to discuss City goals and objectives — King. B. General Plan review discussion — King. NOO !•APPPOmM1NYYOnOnNPNnrtO.l..NrtNn u! VlANl��'! .•PtJLimPlNp OPrNNNUVnOUlOUr<�PpNNW rYN .fYrpp (�.N. �TCCOO�Nyn40rm3 l ra.DSOn ^rCmOmT r Of IUCw CrCC1 if nnnOCrn> r >T.aTrD >Ln >< >�.« On TN Srr Tf> ra Or> Nm }`m)�I•r ]rrl� �SDSUTCne �NT >3..n iY 9 1SOO TT OOni:: n m. =3re< }Tn nn n.rmm >9Nf >S >..F OnJ Fr•I�n rCmn2nrre nu°•> C �A Dll .wO Tnn.ni�> n� lm P > C 1I. °CTi M.. a N a z -MAN NNmUNNDN> r. ,-.A ^>A.w�fm •uc x tizrzY[n�)>nr m..v: ^.°.n °v°SH`TSONN. rrr.. u N nz�i�.S. aNS.•)< )�.nwi Arrs> nzz>�r..y_�T z�i�m inn. -mvnm CC manbns:nine r.r -!>mmr ) ^TmR�nle iti i•�nO'N..nnmr °oiroi Sri °°iTr_TTTr cT ^�n�.•. «p[eaui c L».T> Lrrrne ei . as ra TT <rm �.=. "r�rr iaA.nzo�Y OTCM1 rz�rY <z y �.na Y N � nrr '• .. z o mY< n N�r igr rM N � r� i it m N o r r AI rl �I OnnVOnO�PPO ° +Pn�CPPPn�PCPOP.nnynnU n.�n COnVn PTCTPTP CPC.ITPTPC ^^ O41nTTVM1M1In .eT AmV .Ym�em VVn nAN [e �"N..v ?am "N'N� •• fir °T ^•c.n4 ^aJ a.ineaaa iovn .. m o�000lri °ual: G'` °p['a.. WTPUmT�r..mauomen. .e.°.n o"ir°.. m:Pnov oarmTM1UNNM14NnP ln..lomrnQiNpmpro! uaubo.$o��oonl ni`%.00nnuoa•n oni.onWncOwnuM1nAo uNUOOnoou000. -W OOnnuoronn000nuomnonn.°oanoo i; is .a �a .a C m P r �oP.�wmw�.mN Vwuauwya rv..uua >aow ..a ..v..ww Mvis�ya: R: l.rns:°mn ;at�r r. or -aT^"o iac�.r -a.rn» ^yi «rnN >T .. Nn «" ^�g'•.T SOCrrY nnr>om.r oa��ina�ii +°.c °a Pi..`nyczrTrB�fwin���z °m�a y Can � "'aCiDr ma �S l.r t•ST r�.M .. _ 2 >TnTw <� !• ^mm^r i ^.°.. oT"" m.z.. ro�inm r.^.. �« 'z..� xrNr�iTTn:N....- rwwornT n.a wma -.cri Yr_n r crzzz -o zrz- Acrid Tz }!}'O _m__r- wLmN°OrSOTTy . «OSSMr� ci0+ SNO ^C'��.rn °Df r.sm >wyN.f n�m� °LTf r,.M °>re ^ti.. >r:>ir: Alzi%`sro°o °iT °an -GCwzSv_vynze. nia>srASDyzo ., N Y N<O_My r2 T r a^ N AD TDatiA- NM l�fJ�N w.y. na ii rz,Ax rn �� is :a r T' c e° z ioeno >wrr..r �r >a c.Tr_ OYY >i _ as +•3° �o ^roN i.°.T .ri�a- � °azoarvy T -T.a T AD S� Vnn`'/iTi. YMn nt ' fl n' T r2 n° S.r. O Dn m NS r T Y VOUP nC ?P P RA Peon R.^"p OOn RUrnUn nnlln �]0 p0. I OOROOt♦ roaw +n mnmmm�R M'FO ^u °a vu .a ra°a .o .P> +mourn m.:A eo o.:: p PV aPUw- odo yc «a .:: a u uu u uw a uuamv _yon wa ...a�au�n uaNwaw- ....., v M$i ^-.0 oo n.. vwncRR :e m .> n •r .D �1 1pa :a .a a O r a a Z r �.P.N..N Ursr:>m e.Nr .• }vvvsYYv -).n avr N,frvvn )acr...NVv � ^_ rzNN3z f. nnn.+ � .... ^n.¢eo�ioo ^TT�:iei`C•`c�cF_ aQ C.0 r�311mi2nTTnnN }OmVU SZ fti• rOT. n= anS1 C�JCm Rji- .rnmT`O�OVC >On?)C < }rii =SY <r�YrOR�=KJi=TOn�imZU���TO f! m >C�OV[J�[�[� N 4 L` nrCT>�T ^mR >.DiC nmrr >R�• mC >•rir mnr » »> ;�NYR AmViO ff'T iiO n1m OL1�C�Om Dm fTTP ^. f nMO.°.RR CCO n g nn• ns Ji�r=•T�ro� rp y'f � � '� -i >� i o r av•n .D..°.c ^� r i Nmn rrr r-. An n •' STnu O• U J Cr trD n O nJ � rn SV 2 r0 Tu�O uC n � � r Vn LJ•N n• < R M r m R i TTS�rTOL.M�Tinmrm<Dn3�nlilD2l rC ZOCm }�00 r.�P> moN.-_ tn1 nNam[��i p>iT i_ Nln Dl7r T ^n >r��C�T D•DnrnClrMVe.m <'TN Tmn � Nf•n ZC7AwP9Ln >Tm TJinR n.n• T+= nrTYnr�' ROryr C .. y.nN1r> u. itL rNn�r D CnO<.n ^ r•J..n•P+ ^Nr >m.•.n.. >r ^r.n9`O�S•=n"SKlrT TSTVr C 9 N.9(lT� SNamOn y SR =n'ezOpz D1NJ1~ >!n >> ND '2 r y SnTS D ^^fY �Nn S�.•D'y•T. <m2 �•<nr - ni PA z` -iNF o � A«ir S ant + v.nrn - S.�o�vn o °nzr z� '^ r �riz .z.• S�N..a uR•-". z ,.. i= � c cR L°. m •^•fir is L��z�N ) c r n'.' A Rn `• D n °z .• i rs nR e° r Oi ~, l' in n`- nn �nn.Jn nRMnnn it r mi Ti � °r'• _C ini � oc.J. °nay ^ is Da a Mmn Gt n•Dn• T r =TS [rTTm D A T CD �Z � 3 Orr 'T Di D`DnD r rr NTn ,nr r r wrN y __ Nr vt=. M� N RN N r rRn R .r..•• pp N nwM .Tnn ✓.Zi•N OPPPPRPPPPrPPnn�n00.•O nVnOOnnOOnVOnOOnnVfR uair.Nn «`U 'PdOLy.PduR0��700u >IPingP wRPmAnmOR�pnRn NrC ��wrPNl�4rnpAYVV)u4�am000N1w0. .NOR- .ryry��r CaOrP rCCO•.RV♦ N N 2 N .p Mdr0yS000NNCj r Nun'(1V .•N O N: rRNNd+.NUUnNnNTnpNOVnrynV�y NOC.fy NCMrr� u�nONrOTt�VTOnOi�A•�•�np�r d"P NAnA(.004VRUOnpr OPdOr•.V UOCn4JPOPU)n 3 .D } �p U a �Z T r O s bVrnlVruJPbnrrbOrNaNOPrPOn mrVPNlu ^lNrPr �> su 099L�OT1 >YSS n/SnTm1100r1rOCi >�.... �DOrm Ormmr T rr-•o ra'asrrnrr Ysnrc rrrr nµPm>srri cnNrrr arr roa: r nrzry� ' C ' +�r c.�. -r nPm YCrxr >aY �a 'c <izxrrrer zzls r.. YTT O�- ' r ri /.rror...rP .°.m xn�r arF r.°•z r>rnrs ez. r rr. r ^y, z� ' y Pr S�. .. ParPi/r. � ni.a./"r.°.c rrr z -r roc z xo r.obirg smiar r -�/rr mizM •zzc it t: ••,. z>n9 aY n^ _ rca u n�ccN ri aaccn �P /. zr« 'irrnbPSr y`scn r � r � ray OY u0 9r0 S� y TG � CS r 9 V wC r j �SOi �'�nS 1 > n r N � r p z � � 9 a'r ie irPn dam• O ni.rei0•.w io�-ni -ri r-. LnNy� srrwm rr `�Y( n/Jt� Trir•O+ Vnix2r^ +myPSSjN�9�D„y `M1 (c�n Or r wr�r Yr�9rrr O�rT rl O wy� n:r o<z 4 y rz �rrcza Pc-•Tr MAYO T- 0a2 = OTSyL rPi rn L xf irrror ^c r�'. cic� crr r o � �c nn ' r ^° pi ^nn'•aTn any: � i n� .r-nin o n'L' �c n r nTnzm F A znr c ..r DNZYMaa ;•k ` nia..: Azz. a z v-. zn y as ors r z m., m i > IZo , nod^ noornnurnorononoo ..u00000noonononuorur �o�aue Pamre$PJ,paiPa�POeWdW.di/L�u °aeie r �s yard u u HK N r, alJJf NNNNNrrrrr r•. lur OdbrPVfuN s ID n OrP Vful ^OravluNVOaOrp VJy .f r O Ofn PMr r r NNr =FrV dfLMyPrr � ri a'~PV / r PPrd ID r {r// rP d11�. YOrNU� IJONy drdMrpPN.ra .wP dONany�pPrrl�MlVONadP O: OV ly J �,+,rrO,VybI ^.pMwONr MrUnVOOrOOnOMOnOMOOPOaPNJOa POYCaVffN ..000nuUOfrnnONOCOOaOOJO> 1 g, I r , MI, S- +�JC�Ya1Nle JOVY�O�MWU,4•W4 WJ bV•WryOyy« Cw UOPnmUeWrOOPYrl y4Uyr +« JC af`NON1J4•P NOPOPy ;nr i m ^n4p.9£'aSr ^ccc= ��'n'^a nio oaTii�n1"iii $.D..n .<..ii nnSNNL_2 n«YUm<nr >f�>yjCjC >�•'•e =y T41h>S >TTMNiDCe OrOmn em «.y •).D•aO �Sx2SS »•'f�TSOmN)e SDr 'n �=nil=> °C �y)y••�ny,D tn•]r],,FF a•(•FTyySUf 3:TN >00°rt ^I F OF nnnrm2n2 I'n O�ZYS�Swyi yNnN 1nSSC0l�mrr> �F;'sF -N.c r°in> " nr �.noNFN:« °i,'.'.FS$Fini d,-" iTi,P. ii' ,'r.•�M%,n_[sL°N.>- �F�er- c °.<.. �.cc�OD O�mP>�eaF. nf0,4:h;D >j•r >1r«rr SrP+ y >TCTT ^,n [•l�mOF [S•r>�."n_m ^,TnNC«•rr. ,.Miww••• C y. •,r ^c °c,(nn 'lrr aNrt ::. aen r�','n'nv gip, `ccl.°•.T. •'^ vn < DD magna rzJrsns�N SjV tr�. ^• , n F a N n r p y=f ritf s°iOm �• °o <:. i.ai,a. ,o :n'j `a ,n.•e'i::mX��� of tj 04•rS� S T =FnO >. J nPmNe +MSrmnN >` >Mn� N OIPn ¢D.•N.ainDY2! >� }T /`�.JONDrn }SCPrf a m ` aNTn >w. }N n i '] '•n �imnn. °Z>.r.'a,rn` ^e YN 4. «.. Nrno .r zs`TN �.� • emn.cNr .•n erg: vm+ �.z•'."iT•RO °mn''N ,m �iN.e. n,",•• �„z.T :iFi�mNT >ro >o e..= xr,zv.,. nw en•z w '�Nns.r- ^:�r:mysvr «u in'.. - =,',. i"i= •�.iK.D,.« -aTa zi: , .z. imy.,naN cF <o >s�wmnr JFn�oyo rNb>•m ^i .. �cr OOry< « �rO�C r �y D[Om SVVTDS �eM O/e`]vD (� � N <crrn cr >crc eninL �i ^�,mm = nmzT %> F�zns ma.-mc oo of ,r. ^zMr> naNr n'° a Fnnnnn: ^F,n ^nn ^ v nn c.T N:. ec N r. r . c• « >'n.sr. i �+S ic.: i rs^'....T„y .2• sz si ri 'S7 ^T y a9 1}T•r L >LaD� a DT nD rr NN N NN f-N , q nnVnnOOPw�r�n� ^( ^OUn U.sVOnn ^. n.. OailaYaa•Yia.P{•JaJi�PP C �> PPC P^OnOOnnUnVnnn j,l j,y t.COaJJ•/al.[Pia J.l•naJdidy !v1 Jamp.em Tenm euM1yryyyY Y..y yP CPnPO•nPrtp "'CI,m rP � PJVN «nCmyPUJ yN «rl ,CP rnVJWMrOaaYbv� ri ,} — y n rrJaw uW« �n ^.!n - • +a a.°.:.S o4`. W.'n °:.J.. W yNyn °o o�.°, a m .n•�. ro.. «JyyoyeWO, ^,.« r aooN.>y yom uOP J.. °u •h noyNnoa.•oarp�•�,°.nc°r «.i �� v o•:wro�ui o4P..n•,w••a.. , S- iv �o �> �K �i :. o:' .- c �< a M> i f � m� Si is n_ /` OT T _ Mr c „ o�. ii F °. �°w i i o ,.. � :s r -. a � ; s i t 3 4 .} x tt. I Y' Y� .� s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ff 1977 DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager PROMO Jim Dart, Administrative Servic a Director /Deputy City Treasurer SUBJECT: Receive and Pile - City of Rancho Cucamonga Investment Schedule Status Report as of March 12, 1986. PURCHASE MATURITY INTEREST INSTITUTION DATE DATE AMOUNT - -RUB- Central Savings 02 -05 -66 08 -22 -:6 100,000 0.08750 Foothill Independent Bank 03 -07 -86 04-02-86 634,985 0.07125 Guardian Savings 02 -19 -66 09 -05 -a. !00,000 0.08350 Pacific Savings Bank 03 -06 -86 10 -31 -86 100,000 0.08400 Progressive Savings 03 -07 -86 11 -10 -86 100,000 0.08250 Bank of America 08 -15 -85 03 -13 -86 100,000 0.07725 Gibraltar Savings 6 Loan 06 -18 -85 03 -17 -86 500,000 0.08000 Sun Savings 6 Loan 03 -18 -85 03 -18 -96 100,000 0.10500 Investment Status Report Page 2 INSTITUTION FORCSASS DATE MATURITY DATE AKWA INTEREST RATS PAIR MARLBT VALUE Foothill Independent Bank 12 -19 -85 03 -20 -36 761,151 Tramury Billsl Golden Pacific Bank 04- 05.65 04 -03 -86 100,000 0.10500 Great Western Savings 07 -09 -05 04 -07 -86 100,000 0.07700 Y Long Beach Savings A Loan 04 -30 -85 04 -07 -36 100,000 0.07700 • Bank of Beverly Bil,s 10 -18 -85 04 -16 -86 100,000 0.06400 Great Western Savings 12 -17 -85 04 -16 -16 SGO,000 0.07850 Creat Western Savings 11 -04 -85 05-03 -86 200,000 0.08150 Par West Savings A Loan 11 -04 -85 05 -05 -86 100,000 0.08500 American DlversiPied 11 -06 -85 05 -05 -86 100,000 0.09375 Nei Bank 05 -16 -85 05 -15-86 100,000 0.09500 Southwest Savings A Loan 05 -20 -85 05 -20 -86 500,000 0.10000 • Fidelity Federal Savings 06 -17 -85 06 -17 -86 100,000 0.09250 lmperLal Savings 09 -23 -85 06 -30 -86 100,000 9.08300 Ieaerial Savings 01 -06 -86 06 -30 -86 100,000 0.08000 f United Bank 01 -29 -66 06 -23 -86 100,000 0.08750 Brookside Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 05 -28 -86 100,000 0.08625 Manila Bank of Calif. 01 -31 -86 03-12 -86 100.000 0.08250 Country Savings Bank 01 -31 -86 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09500 100,000 J Wilshire Savings A loan 01 -31 -86 05 -09 -66 100.000 0.08500 Sterling Savings A Loan 01 -29-86 06 -06 -86 100,00C 0.08500 Westwood Savings A Loan 01 -31 -86 05 -2846 100.000 0.08700 j Equitable Savings A Loan 01 -31 -86 06 -02 -86 100,000 0.02850 Cal American Savings A Loan 01 -31 -66 02 -01 -88 100,000 0.09600 100,000 Investment status Report Page 3 INSTITUTION PURCHASE RATE MATURITY RATE Atli INTEREST RATE PAIR MMET VALUE Eastern Savings 6 Loan 01 -28 -06 01 -28 -88 100,000 0.09750 100,000 Cepital Bank 01 -29 -86 01 -29 -87 100,000 0.09250 100,000 So. Calif. Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09150 100,000 Atlas Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 07 -30 -86 100,000 0.09375 Great Pacific Swinge 02 -03 -86 02 -03 -89 100,000 0.09750 100.000 Bel -Air Savings L Loan 02 -04 -86 02 -04 -87 100,000 0.09250 Westport Savings Bank 02 -05 -86 02 -05 -87 100,000 0.08750 Family Savings 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 02 -06 -87 100,000 0.08750 Bell Savings 6 Loan 02 -03 -86 06 -06 -86 100.000 0.08750 Mortb American Savings 02 -03 -66 06 -09 -66 100,000 0.08750 Nev American Savings 02 -03 -66 06 -09 -86 100,000 0.08250 Inland Savings 6 loan 02 -05 -86 08 -11 -86 100,000 0.08500 Columbus Savings 6 Loan 02 -05 -86 08 -22 -86 100,000 0.08750 American Commerce Natiooal 02 -05 -66 06-'j-86 100,000 0.08375 Executive Savings 6 Loan 02 -05 -86 06 -23 -86 100,000 0.08250 Preaidio Savings 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 08 -11 -86 100,000 0.08700 Plaza Savings 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 08 -11 -86 100,000 0.08500 Del Ann Savings 6 Loan 02 -10 -86 08 -25 -86 100,000 0.08375 National Bank of Calif. 02 -10 -86 06 -30 -86 100,000 0.08500 Huntington Savings A Loan 02 -10 -86 08 -25-86 100.000 0.08750 Irvine City 8avioge 6 Loan 02 -10 -86 06 -09 -86 100,000 0.08000 Cbarter Savings A Loan 02 -12 -86 06 -20 -86 100.000 0.08350 Commercial Center Bank 02 -12 -86 07 -18 -86 100,000 0.08250 a Iovastoent Status Report Page 4 PURCHASE MATU2ITY ISTEREST PAIR MARRSr jRSTITUTIOR DATE DATE AMOURI RAVE VALUE Investment savings 6 Loan 02 -12 -86 07 -07 -85 100,000 0.08230 First Coe sercial Bank 02 -12 -86 07 -21 -66 100,000 0.08500 4 Sierrr 'ederal Savings 02 -12 -86 07 -21 -86 100,000 0.08300 South roast Thrift 6 Loan 02 -13 -86 07 -18 -86 100,000 0.08250 Rancho Bank 02 -13 -86 02 -13 -87 100.000 0.09000 Desert Community Bank 02 -13 -86 02 -13 -99 100,000 0.09873 100,000 Liberty Savings 6 Loan 02 -13 -86 09 -14 -87 100,000 0.09250 r Pioneer Savings A Loan 02 -13 -86 07 -21 -86 100,000 0.08530 Golden Pacific Savings 02 -14 -86 02 -17 -87 100,000 0.08750 Gold River Savings A Loan 02 -14 -86 02 -18 -87 100,000 0.08750 Secure Savings A Loan 02 -19 -86 02 -19 -87 100.000 0.09000 Guardian Savings A Loan 02 -19-86 09115 -86 100,000 0.09350 r First Security Savings Bank 02-.9-86 09 -05 -S6 100,000 0.08500 Financial Savings A Loan 02 -19 -86 30 -17 -86 100,000 0.08500 Household Bank 02 -21 -86 09 -19 -86 100,000 0.08650 i� S, Downey Savings A Lose 02 -25 -86 08 -25 -86 600,000 0.07900 m 7 Valley Federal Savings 02 -24 -86 09-22 -86 500,000 0.08000 r Centennial Savings A Loan 02 -25 -86 10 -03 -86 100,000 0.08730 1 k South Bey Savings 6 Loan 02 -25 -86 02 -25 -81 100,000 0.08750 ri Mt. Whitney Savings A Loan 02 -25 -86 02 -25-87 100,000 0.08750 4 ' Empire National Bank 02 -25 -86 30 -03 -86 100.600 0.08300 Guaranty Savings 6 Loan 02 -25 -86 02 -25 -87 100,000 0.08700 Western Empire Savings 02 -25 -86 10 -20 -86 99,000 0.08625 x /O lovestmot Status Report Page 5 PURCHASE MATURITY INTEREST FAIR MARKET DATE DATE AMOURT AATR yALUe Formate Savings 02 -25 -86 Veatern Financial Savings 02 -26 -86 C39tury City Savioga 6 Loan 02 -26 -86 National Bank of Catalina 02 -27 -86 Pounders Savings 6 Loan 02 -27 -86 Mercantile Bank 02 -28 -86 i Century Bank 02 -25 -86 Security Federal Savings 02 -78 -86 North Coast Savings 03 -03 -86 Merit Savings Bank 03 -03 -86 Pint Savings 6 Loan 03 -03 -86 First Federal Savings Bank 03 -03 -86 Southwest Bank 03 -03 -86 Royal Oak Savings 6 Loan 03 -03 -86 University Savings 6 Loan 03 -04 -86 Newport Balboa Savings 03 -03 -86 r Comsercial Pacific Savings 03 -04 -86 Onion Federal Savings 03 -04 -66 , Lo Jolla Village gunk 03 -04 -86 Bask of Whittier 03 -04 -86 Brentwood Savings 6 Loan 03 -04 -86 International Savings Bank 03 -05 -86 !, Manhattan Book Savings 03 -05 -86 10 -06 -66 10 -06 -86 02 -26 -87 02 -27 -89 10 -27 -86 03 -02 -87 C7 -28 -86 01 -26 -87 03 -03 -89 01 -27 -87 03 -03 -87 11 -26 -86 03 -03 -87 01 -27 -87 03 -03 -87 30 -20 -86 03 -04 -87 03 -04 -87 03 -04 -87 10 -21 -86 03 -04 -87 03 -07 -88 03 -05 -87 /1 100,000 0.08875 100,000 0.08550 100,000 0.08750 100,000 0.09500 100,000 0.08500 100,000 0.08300 400,000 0.08375 100,000 0.08500 100,000 0.09250 100,000 0.08500 100,0(10 0.9000 100,000 0.08&•00 100,000 0.07850 100,000 0.08375 100,000 0.08750 100.000 0.08250 100,000 0.08625 100,000 0.08500 100,000 0.08500 100,000 0.08300 100,000 0.08750 100,000 0.08750 100,000 0.08750 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 'nv,etwat status Report tag& u /v PORCBASS MATORITY DATIL OATS_ _ IflTHRHST aa7H FAIR KMX T ULOH a7MII0fl Guardian Federal Saving$ 03-02 -86 Hidden galley Bak' 03-05-66 Bank 03 -05 -86 /uer!cen Rest Bank 03 -05 -86 Pan Aaerican Savings Back 03-05-86 Continental Savings 03 -05 -86 Indepeadeact Bavlag$ 03 -05 -66 goat/ •a Family Hank 03 -06 -86 Lincoln Savings 6 Loan 03 -06 -86 03 -06 -86 Ce *tury Thrift Sao Claneate Saving$ 6 Loan 03 -07 -86 Raritage Oake Bank 03_11 -86 07 -11 -86 Conmerce Savings Arrwkead Pacific Saving* 03-11 -86 Pomona First Federal 03 -11 -eb Y e*t*ide Savings 6 1,064 03 - Ii -85 Los Angeles Federal $aviugs 03 -11 -66 eo&e*tate Savings 6 Loan 03 -11 -86 Mestco Saviaga Hank 03.11 -85 valley Commercial Bank 03-12 -86 03 -12 -86 Alvarado Bank va11e7 Hationai Bank 03 -12 -06 Suisun valley Rank 03 -12 -86 03 -05-87 100.000 0.08500 n3 -07 -88 100,000 0.08750 03-05•.88 100,000 0.0875L 03 -07 -88 100.000 0.08750 03 -07 -89 100.000 0.09250 03 -07 -89 100.00G 0.09150 03 -06 -87 100.00D 0.08375 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.08800 11 -07 -86 100.000 C.09000 I1 -07 -86 100.000 0.08000 03 -10 -89 100.000 0.09000 11 -26 -86 100,000 0.08000 12 -31 -86 100,000 0.08250 11 -19 -E6 100.000 0.08250 03 -10-89 100.000 0.09000 03 -10 -88 100,000 0.09000 03 -10 -89 100,000 0.09000 03-11-87 100.000 0.08750 09 -08 -89 1Cn,000 0.09250 03 -12 -87 100,000 0.08250 03-12 -87 100.000 0.06L00 07 -13 -89 1000.000 0.09000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.030 100,000 100.000 100,000 /v Investment Status Report Page 7 INSTITUTION PURCHASE PATE MATURITY DATE AMOUNT INTEREST RATE PAIR MARE6T VALUE Vineyard National Bank 12 -27 -85 07 -02 -86 100,000 0.08000 Footbill Independent Bank 01 -09 -86 07 -02 -86 100,000 0.07125 American Savings 6 Loan 06 -29 -84 07 -07 -86 100,000 0.13200 American Savings 6 Loan 07 -09 -65 07 -09 -86 100.000 0.09375 Bank of America 12 -30 -85 07 -15-86 100,000 0.07275 Beverly Hills Savings 07 -15-85 07 -15 -06 100,000 0.09400 California Federal Savings 01 -13 -86 07 -16 -86 100.000 0.07900 Foutbill Independent Bank 01 -13 -86 08 -06 -86 300.000 0.07125 Bank of America 01 -14 -86 08 -20 -86 100,000 0.07575 Glendale Federal 01 -27 -86 06 -25 -85 100,000 0.0920D Sears Savings Bank 03 -22 -85 09 -26 -86 100,000 0.10700 signal Savings 01 -10 -86 10 -16 -86 100.000 0.08750 Pacific Savings Bank 30 -24 -85 30 -24 -86 91,224 0.09620 American Saving. 11 -04 -85 12 -04 -86 100,000 0.09000 Upland National Sauk 01 -27 -86 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.08500 Pquitec 01 -27 -86 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.08800 Gibraltar Savings 6 Loan 02 -14 -85 02 -20 -87 100.000 0.10250 100,000 Dean Witter Reynolds 04 -18 -85 05 -15-88 97,181 Treasury Bfll *2 110,250 Lincoln Saving, 6 Loan 02 -13 -85 02 -13 -90 100,000 0.11125 100.000 Goveroacnt Nat'l Mortgage 04 -16 -94 01 -15 -2011 794,160 0.13000*1 855,707 Local Agency Invest Fund 12 -04 -85 As Needed 2,250,000 0.09170 Local Agency Invest Food 12 -20 -85 As Needed ',, 730.000 0.09170 Sub Total, 24,077,702 /3 Investment Status Report Page 8 PURCHASE MATURITY INTEREST INSZL 0j10$ DATE DATE AMOUNT RATE i2=A1 Greet Western Savings 02 -19 -86 04 -21 -86 7.257.444 0.08000 Sub Total: 7,257,444 84-1 Great Western Savings 03 -07 -66 04 -07 -86 100,000 0.07375 Great Western Savings 01 -31 -86 05 -09 -86 100,000 0.08000 Crest Western savings 08 -29-85 03 -31 -86 100,000 0.08100 Great Western savings 09 -03 -85 04 -01 -86 100,000 0.08150 Creat Western Savings 03 -03 -86 05 -02 -86 4,100,000 0.08100 Crest Western savings 02 -25 -86 07 -28-86 100,000 0.08375 Sub Total: 4,600,00'1 As of 12 -26 -85 Grand Total: 35,935,146 el Treasury Bills are purchased at a price balm their maturity value. They are quoted and traded on the basis of yield to maturity. The approximate Interest earned on this six month investment vill be 913.850.00. e2 The approximate interest earned on this investment rill be 9340000.00. a3 Securities which are backed ly pools of govetament insured or guaranteed mortgagee. Note 4: All investments are Certificates of Deposit unless otbeniso noted above. Al PAIR MUKET VALDE a���y 3 t � Fr(� • ct e.- Cunt FOR DV1428 01 INjO y ` L CITY OF RANCHO UCA ONGA 1. Claims for death, injury to person, or to persons •Oh1N11T,, VON P Property cost be filed no later than 100 days after the occur coca (Gov. Code, gee. 911.2). [N.i 3 19% 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed no AY , occurrence (Gov. Code, gee. 911.2).�IQ1112�ijQ�sisY° TO: CITY OF RA.7C10 CUCAMONGA ! .i1JY .v,.'n.r.r., ro+r ) e 1 WS? 3y. Name of Claimant Address Zip Phone A$e f iv 'r C e.4 rv. Address to which Claimant wishss eobices sent. YgID did damage or injury occur? ON I Zr' 0.4 y ci F1tf 11 116 Nmi did damage or injury occur?, %z %. +- ..1�..�../Y/ y, °r'U/ 90Y and under what circumstances di d damage or injury occur? -eau, part'cutar action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include mamas of employees, if know). What sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be know at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed. (Attacm estimates or bills, if possible). Total Amcuot Claimed: RAW and addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitals: n Oats S yytur' of Claimant CLAIM 709 DANACH OR Twiny , 1. Claim@ for death, injury to person, or to personal property moot be filed no later than 100 days after the occurreace (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to red property must be filed no later than 1 year the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). To: CITY OF &ANC8O COCANOSGA a?C T7 S if Z✓(c3 9Ip0 F/�L<� /T��l73n �if7- J'r.'/ 21J Mama of Claimant Address Zip phone •.��'.�% Age Address to which Claimant vlehea tatoticas sent V® did damage or injury occur? 2 T P6 /on !✓D "x-'F UMM did damage or :ujury occurs C��t P /Zy'o �fo ly,c y/ TF ✓�.J NOW and under what circuastantes did damage or injury occur? 1-.1g) j5 PO 1 -iC =La 77.K" V%7 44. zc & O,P Ti5cR 7.✓r9J i,pJ 9 SccGc:RJ17At_ oroF G/y7 ?1= FAv� > -a .cr i 9r.C� .c S i T ! ^�•'7 L.at TJ J'4'LJ :.vF n ci ;e .,2vi n i c'S'Ln iIUT particular action by the City or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of employees, if know) ✓K4(r�2caJi Q.dGyJrr Q /A LcoSC Fi t aC f t J6» Li ,/'>✓ !� What am do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar a■ it may be knova at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis Of Computation of the amount claimed. (Attach estimates or bills, if poadble). 113 r 62 Z.'7 Za_ ;&2 2 r ' .3 $ _.t,i'O •a r 2 F[.•G 4Ftu -x n+IrC 2-- S.>' S20 L?s�o Total Amount Claimed: S M!? -S ■AWRS and addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitals. 7i Jt„:a� W TNy src�n.�cy �/� c- Jot /LD fl.G ✓E' G.R/ ��r�.orN,i2T Oats Signature o Claimant CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Vartan V. Vartanians, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Current and Common Use Agreement No. FA 18512 with San Bernardino County Flood Control District Within a Portion of the Alta Loma Basin No 2 Attached for Councils execution is the subject Common Use Agreement for a 40-foot-wide equestrian trail along the northern boundary of the District's Alta Loma Basin No. 2, between Haven and Hermosa Avenues. Under the agreement, the City assumes the liability for the maintenance and operation of the land in Joint use- and recognizes not to interfere with the operation of Districts flood control facilities. The proposed agreement is similar to other crossings of District right of way, and is required to legalize the established crossing. RECOMIENDATIOM It is recommended that City Council approve and execute the Consent and :ommon Use Agreement No. FA 18512 with San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Respeftfully submitted, :sr Encl 7 ne'e drn/rg4 /eI f11n.J.� SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD CONTRACT FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY 6,n G,nWpe Gwnry F,oe0 Cwn0, OMnRt ppnpFnrt ryumao /bpC COnnOI eHOHICNO «r NFpe,InYtlw Cent/ «IarY LH,nM NOmOV JAMS L DUI;N 1634 rn a.Op,t UrvI NO [u090HtI Na /eM NO. JOO HO. llmwnt el Ganlr «r 010 691 FA18512 /.W «IN..COHSENT TO COK -0I1 ..nn «tn «man SE AGRMYMrr - ALTA Lam `Oinp1't. m.lau»t,y r.rm.nw [mm.n ASIN NO. 2 •ooro.)m/tF •moot E «n THIS CONTRACT is entered Into In the State of California by and between the San Samardino County Flood Control District, hereafter called the District, and N. CITY OF RAtICHO CUCAM)IIGA hereafter called City waE,m roan. ewtn 0... F..10.0 NO e, S.O.'S «.Illy Ne IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (UM W" below and ddidand bond [Ant. Set /orrb Xrrlte to be renderod, dnount to be paid, mmner orpsyment nine /Or perrOmU 0r COmpIFOOt, damsel /nViO n Of UVSfXWM per/OrmmcS and Cause 101 atmina00n. Odlar RJmt and M416anA, and ertXb plan, AWIrcadan. and addends, limy./ W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga dashes to use a portion of the Flood Control District's rights -of -way along the north side of the Alta Loan Basin No. 2, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an equestrian trail, landscaping and appurtenances, which portion I$ shown on attached plat maps marked "Exhibit A" er,C Exhibit eBe and made a part of this agreement; and, WHEREAS, DISTRICT Ss willing to permit such uses provided they do not conflict wit^ DISTRICT uses or facilities within said DISTRICT right -of -way; and, WHEREAS. CITY and DISTRICT mutually desire to cooperate in the ,joint use of said lands and ce31re to specify herein the responsibilities of each party for such ,joint use; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. CITY SHALL: 1 Construct, operate and maintain, at the CITY'S sole cost and e.perse, the equestrian trail, landscaping and appurtenant improve- ments vithln said DISTRICT right -of -way; 2. Not construct or cause to be constructed any improvements which will Interfere with the operation and maintenance of DISTRICT'S flood control facilities; /C 1 0b12419,e91 A.r. IWO FAIG512 1 3 F, er- 3. Submit plans for equestrian trail, landscaping and appurtenances to DISTRICT for review, comment and approval, and secure a permit from DISTRICT, or require CITY'S contractor to secure a permit prior to ueginaing of construction DISTRICT shall have 30 days In which to review any such plans, to convent thereon and to approve or disapprove the same and to either Issue any such permit or inform CITY or CITY'S contractor In writing why such permit may not be issued. 4. CITY shall name the DISTRICT as an insured party, or require CITY'a contractor to name the DISTRICT as an Insured party, in public liability and property damage insurance required for the pro, -et. 5 Restore or reconstruct DISTRICT facilities that may be affected by CITY'S use of DISTRICT right -of -way for sold equestrian trail end Other purposes, including access to the basin, relocation of ezl3ting signal Installation of addlt -anal signs and Installation of any fencing that may be required, nil such work shall be shown on the plans to bo submitted for DISTRICT approval as outlined in paragraph I.3 above. 6. Protect the debris retention areas of the basin from public trespass. Special fencing or other awns of delineating equestrian use area shall be used to bar recreation area users from retention area of the basins and the access roads thereto, 7 Upon fourteen ( 14) days notice to Cif Y, allow DISTRICT to close all or any part of equestrian / recreat.on facilities to the public during storm maintenance activities, during routine maintenance work, during the time work is being performed In accordance with permits Issued by the DISTRICT, and to Insure public safety during severe storm conditions. Fourteen -day notice not applicable to emergency maintenance or repair situations. 8. Be responsible for pick up and disposal of all trash within areas utilized by the public for equestrian /recreational purposes Pursuant to this agreement. 9 Be responsible for policing efforts to prohibit motorcycles, thre. -wheel recreational vehicles and motor vehicles from using the equestrian trail. 10. Defend, indemnify snd hold the DISTRICT, its agents and employees free and harmless from any liabilities, claims, or expense arising out of maintenance, operation, or use of CITY facilities rdrmitted hereunder or other work as agreed to be performed hereln by the CITY' / FA18512 Page 2 of 3 II. DISTRICT SMALL: 1. Continue to operate and maintain the basin area and facilities through the areas Involved; and, 2. Continue to operate and maintain patrol roads for operation of the basin facilities. III. IT IS FURTHER MUTUALLY UND01TOOD AND AGREED THAT: I Use of tha right-of-way shown on said "Exhlb't A" for Alta Loma Baaln No. 2 for equestrian trail and related purposes shall be subordinate to the basic flood control and water conservation purpose- of the area as nay be determined by the DISTRICT'S Chlsf Engineer and shall in no way conflict with these purposes. The DISTRICTS Chief Engineer reserves the right to cancel the apeetfic use should, in his opinion, there develop a suLstantlal Incompati- bility between equestrian /recreational uses and Ilocd control and water conservation uses arising from any cause whatsoever. Said use shall be terminated 60 days after notification in writing by the DISTRICT'S Chief Engineer after a 30-day opportunity to "cure" the conflict is given to the CITY. If any use is terminated pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph (III.1), CITY shall have the right, at its sole option, to remove any physical equestrian /recreational facilities from the area in question at its sole cost and expense. Area shall be left in a reasonably neat and graded nanner. !HIS AGREEMENT shall Inure to the benefit of and be binding upor the successors and assigns of both parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective officials thereunto duly authorized. APPROVED AS TO FORM: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ty Tt tdrney FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal Corpo � /Srm Jsoga.DOn, cNn+e+r..xl Chauman. Board of Supervisors Dated ATTESTED: Secretary of the Flood Control District rVOrT'tl Y IV L.NI .N n Cwnry Cwn,,, ODItOMV a... II/.D BY W f..ulDarindSpmnl Title 14AYOR Address P_0 anar.M M le Alllrm,lly. Acl On. 807, RANCHO ANr"Y MlnNlnrMw /CAO Ou. FAI Qj F. of—, -- cew"v 5toFt Y4.Pif; /SL Mw ro LS z Afd, & ----L=4i Lq,V03cA /EO 5"D'F C• Y f to TYOicAL 5E� /O.V- PERMA�/ENT T,Qq /G Scq[ E /' • /O' P/ EXHIBIT B FA10512 — ?AV— - - N3AtlH II Ij .+r n•a. II II g I I I L W •� a I' r I � i tl � Q 1 1 I h 's 3AV - -�- vsoriH3H- 8 V y iQ I e a a t m 611 u t c N d z N ry z � m U) e Q ' € m , r u � � a N Q N J Q a a O wo wn J a •_ U r , a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE, March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer By: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement With Carter Associates Inc., Management lSystem for the City of Rancho (pilot Program; development ands Implementation of a Associates. Program) Pavement Ma Management System 1986, Carter with computer software for the arterial, secondary, and collector streets in the City. The purpose of this program is to define pavement maintenance needs, strategies, procedures, and policies; establish evaluation and software thecrelated software; train City staffhandiprovidesother bnd t bring andmaintainthe sypertod service. scope of work is estimated completed within RECONCKDATIIM It is recommended that City Council approve the attached agreement awarding ahfeebn t to s exceed $21 050.00atogbeepaidyfrom theCGaseTaxsFundstes, Inc., for Respectfully submitt C LBH :LE :sr Enclosure ,D 3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made ano entered into this day of 19_, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, d Municipal Corporation (hereinafter re °erred to as °CITY') and Carter Associates, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT'). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the development PxcAax:atAAa of a Pilot Program Network Pavement Management System (PHS) and Partial Inventory (Alternative 00 °) ("Project" herrafter). (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: ;�, 7/31/05 a development (a) Project: The ork7atAMM of a Pilot Program Network Pavement Management System (PMS) and Partial Inventory (Alternative "D ") described in Exhibit "A' Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and to writing, of such plans, maps, SLrveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other aeetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined to the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT to order to complete the project. (c) Comcletion of Project: The date of completion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical repo ^ts, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings •egarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit "B" Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents ") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A' to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit "B ". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A ". CITY may thereafter review and forward to LONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revis'ons to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents In such form and In the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The Lire limits set forth pursuant to this Section BZ.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT-s sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. ` CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written ap,irovil of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximua sum of c��.nsn nn for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit W. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are 1 received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C" either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum t,mounts for individual tasks. In no -3- D6 event, however, will said Invoices exceed 95: of individual task tctals described in Exhibits W. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis In accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit OC'. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY 4. CITY agrees to crovide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically rep- oducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project (c) Such information as is generally-available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. -4- a� S. OwnershiD of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and mater ats as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans end specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless ana indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Terminatic_ This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written •Notice of Termination- to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit •B ", on a pro - rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination In no event, however, shalt CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CiTY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether to draft or final form, prepared by O CONSULTANT as of dale of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for Cause. 7 Notices and Oesianated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by Lie parties under this Agreement: Gary M. Baker, D.E. Vice P ' P ^L' for Carter Associates Inc. and Blane Frandsen Senior Civil Engineer for the CITY 2815 Camino del Rio South. Ste. 100. San Diego California 92108 Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, snall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit tnereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addresseo as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor, shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the folloning policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Comoensaton Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensaton insurance for all persons whom It may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California, -66- d In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shalt secure the payment of condensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Cade which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before comrencing the performance of the work of this Agreement-. (b) Public Liability and Promerty Oamam : Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expanse, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause- to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000 00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.03) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions, CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning rrors and omissions (•malpractice °) providing protection of at least�_.5---- ono for errors and omissions ("malpractice-) with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Remuiraie•ts: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in -7- responsible Insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8 (a) and (b) shall naae as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, In any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment): No assignment of this-Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in pact, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be '8' 3/ employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or to writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agrrement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. A•.y modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is to writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, thu parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: NS ANT P. iE. CIT 8 °dk�EttB cucArsGNGA Jon D. Mikels-7RYy—or ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk Date: rebruary 27. 1996 Date: -9- 3 , Ap ved s to f fm vbT: ty Attorney Exhibit W Scope of Services 33 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. February 13, 1986 Mr. Blaine W. Prandson Senior Civil "sneer 9320 3aaeline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 RE: DE=PKM_M OF A PILOT PRNCRAM PAVLV= 10NACM07f Sy -'rDt CITY OF RANCHO CI1CA>'DI1GA Dear Mr. Frandsen, we am pleased to respc -A to your rcgw3t for the devalopment and implementation of a (Pilot Program) Pdvemevt Man.,.;ement System for the City of, Rancho 0=monxga, California. As w, havo discussed ,.ceviously, Carter Associates, Inc. special- izes in pavement and maintenance management systems. Our staff consists of experts In tb ;ivement evaluation and maintenance management field who have .:vperience in evaluating more than 50,000 miles of pavement for over 50 public and private agencies throughout the Western United States. As a result of this experience, Carter Associates can provide the most complet.- paverent evaluation and maintenance management systems presently available for roads, streets, airports, parking lots, and vir:uaily all transportation facilities. With a staff of over 63 engineers, technicians, planners end inspectors, we can readily meet your needs. Due to our team's experience, we are familiar with most of the management systems that exist nationally. In addition, we have the most comprehensive computerized management systems presently available. We can therefore assist you in identifying and detzrmining which systems and programs are belt suited for your needs. Since we are not biased to any one system, we are able to assist you in the development of now programs or can customize existing programs to give you the information you need in the most cost- effective, yet practical, usable, easily understandable and bmplementable program. 3V 2835 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUIYI SUITE 100, SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 •(619) 692 -4155 Mr. Blaine W. Frandson Page Two February L', 1986 Of particular importance in highllghttng our capabilities is our experience in developing fully irtegrated infrastructure manlagcmen.t systems. Programs of this nature allow you to begin with a pavement management Syste^ IPMSI, for example, and add other systems, such as, traffic signals, signs, storm drains, aid /oc strinirg, eta, at the appropriate time. In evaluating our tram's qualification, we stress the following ksy factors fcr jour considoration: Our team'a extrsivs experience in developing and implementing pave•aat and saintenem_e ma agear.nt Systems. • Our team's proven bLllty c- perform the necessary analysis and evaluation wichir in established tiffs period, while maintaining a high level of objecti -ity and credibility • our ability to acrk and communicate effectively with staff marbers and ele ted officials. Slstm flex,bility, vet complexity. cur Ln -ho"i computer staff with considerable experie;.^- and expertise in all types of systems, fr•.n Mi. o Computers t- Main Framri systems. our caoicity to present sensitiv, and sometimes ccntr�- iersial findings in a manner that encourages objecti-ve discussion and evaluation. Out experience in developing fully integrated systems tr in, ludo the entire infrastructure at one tints, or, in irsrenents our in -house project managenent systrma are designed to manage projects at any distance from • •r office, while providing a level a serv.ro and support, equivalent or superior to our being a local firm. In the attached Fee Schedule portion of our proposal, we have listed alternatives to the inventory process We *enc:urage you to seriously consider the 50/50 plan which has proven quite successful with other municipalities. We aiz- cn- ourago you to contact any references listed in the attached Related Project Experience. We believe these clients can provide the most oblective perspective of our capabilities and services. M t Mr. Blaine W. Fra dron , Page 'Three February 13, 1986 Thank you once again for the opportunity to present this proposal. We look forward to working with the City in the development of this vary necessary and wor6'a+hile program. Sincerely, CA ASSOCIATES, . . �ry M. ker, P.E. Vice President Director, Infrastructure Management Services G%Z/ka Attacnaents 3a As maintenance costs rise and the demard for government services increases, it Is apparent that there exists a need for more effective road maintenance prtirams. This demand has caused public works agencies to seek management systems that plan and control maintenance work, as well as provide maximum utilization of available resources. This plar+ning and controlling translates Into efficient ptoductlon of government services. Considering such an extensive road system, The City of Rancho CVcamonga must be very cost - efficient in developing a pavement management system. With close to 270 dual lane miles of reads under its maintenance, It may be difficult to establish a maintenance scheduling and budgeting program for the entire system, particularly without a computerized program. A pavement management system is therefore needed vith the following features: 1. Ability to systematically assess, docament, and update the condition of the entire street network (eventually) on a perpetual basis. 2. Generate retrieval of data in various formats to allow flexibility in both budgeting analysis and maintenaice scheduling. 3. The system shall possess both network and project -level capabilities. It will allow for an easy -to- understand rating procedure, including visual evaluation, or the entire networt. Provision will also be available for the inclusion of more comprehensive project -level evaluation, as required. 4. Program justification and budget information, including street aystem replacement value, budget ana'ysim and at least five -year program budget. The system shall include provision for backlog budget analysts for the entire system, It will also be able to provide budget effects of deferred maintenance projects. S. Maintenance projections describing mainbmance treatments and schedules for each street in the system. 6. Maintenance forecasts by each mairtcnanco strategy, Including costs for at least five (5) years. Cost data must have the flexibility for modificatior according to local corditions. 7. A separate inventory and listing of all current pavement repair needs and cos s. 37 B. A complete listing of all deficiencies for each segment of street. 9. The program should use a full range of Pavemant maintenance techniques (at least nine parameters) and allow for selecting techniques appropriate for the City. The techniques to be included might be: • Overlay (various thicknesses). Heater Scarificaton • Rehabilitation . Grinding and Milling • Slurry Seals . Fabrics (Petro -Ftaq • Capc Seals . Rubberized Asphalts • Chip Seals . Crack Fillers • Oil Treatxntz . Dig -Out Replactments 10. Other approaches and techniques that both tha city and the consultant determino appropriate for the city. 3 38 CVEWIM OF MPOSM PARR PROM M This work program is generally designed to define pavement ma interance needs, strategies, procedures and policies, establish vstc,; zed evaluation and softwars procedures, conduct a thorough in -entory of your system, develop and implement the related software eventually, (if desired) train your staff, and provide other services w necessary to bring and maintain the system to fall service. The completion of the work program assumes a close, cooperative working relationship with your staff. Our suggested approach begins with a visual analysis of the Arterials, Secondary and collector portions of the Street Network (Pilot Program). If desired, we will then perform p-roject level evaluation in the portions of your road system (at a later date) which have been determined to warrant closer investigation through the network analysis. Again, our experience has generally shown that only 10 - 20 percent of tho system usually warrants this more costly pavement evaluation. This type of evaluation Is conducted separate from the Network System contract Our Proposed Fork Program is designed to: 1. Review your files, past maintenance activities and other information which is relevant to your pavement syst®. 2. Define the physical extent of the system to be studied. 1. Determine the sPacific type and scope of services to be provided by this study. 4. Determine the desired reporting format. 5. Define the Final lbrk P•cgrm, including determination of acceptable maintemnce trategies, procedures and policies. 6. Conduct a complete inven.ory of existing conditions. 7. Evaloate the data, focusing on: providing visual analysis of the entire system. - providing protect level canprehenvive analysis Including dynamic deflection analysts, care and soil borings on the more cxitieal sections requiring detailed analysis at h later date, as requested by the city. Identification of candidate streets car, be made through the Network Summary. 5 39 B. Identify ealntenanco needs, including: - type, location and schedulinq of maintenance required= - caparison of conditions with adopted service levels; - esti::ated maintenan�a cost; - annual budget pr-grams. 9. Develop and provide the most complete cost - effective and carpaterized pavaoent mmnagerent system, fc11y considering: - budgetary constraints; - present and potential maintenance procedures, policies and strategies; - annual program of orlorities: - flexibility for upgrading; - existing and anticipated in -douse computer hardware systems. The management system will be categorized on the basis of a routine preventative maintenance program and a major maintenance and /or rehabilitation plogr= (backlog mwgexnt plan). 19. rmlementation of soft. re (if desired), including Rating 6 User Manuals, and Strategy )Sditing Manual. 11. ;Paining of your staff for future use of system. 12. Provide conputordzed reports and an executive sutmary. 6 Sid DETAIL: OF PRCPOSM WORK PROGRAM 1. DEFniz PROGRAM PARA`4.= Meetings with leuz staff will be held to review your present Programs, maintenance procedures, and files. We will then determine the type of output necessary for the system to function properly. We will also discuss presently available systems which can be modified or new systams that can be developed. A further review of present policies and procedures will be done to ensuLe that the developed maintenance programs and overall system are in agreement with present needs After a full review ct your needs, the most appropriate pavement management components will be selected for use in this systm. Ttr. ultimata product will then constitute the Final Work Program. 2. CM== ME;WORK IhVE=Rr of PAVLWr' SYSTEM The basic components of our inventory are: segment the system into sections for else of collecting; report and rev.ew the data; imen.tory the complete network; review and analyze the results of the network inventory; and complete the analysis and generate reports. The following is a brief description of these catpontnts: a. Segmentation: All roads are analyzed and segmented based on the following criteria: • Significant changes in the width of the road; • Changes in surface condition or surface type; • A set standard length or maximeavlainimm lengths; • A range in the improvements that have been made to the pavement. A route sequence ratber!ng system will be established based on your general needs as well as those relating specifically to this study. 8 i/ b. Pavement Surface Survey: The entice system will be driven, numbered, and rated, taking into account the actual surface condition and physical characteristics of each secment. The information will include: Physical Data • Vumber of travel lanes; • Parking supply, for example, no parking, one side of the street, or both sides of the street; • Presence, percentage, condition and type of curb and gutter in the section; • General condition of adjacent areas such as sheulders7 • Section quantities, indicating the length, width, and total square yard, ,e of the section; • Surface type, for examplo, Ac, PCCP, Quip Seal. Condition Characteristics • Distressed me" which require preparatory work prior to major maintenance; • Drainage eff4clency in each segment; • Overall comition rnm%ber, taking into account the =fare coed Lion and level of distress w provide an overall condition assessment. The rnaberirq system will simulate a typical pavement life cycle curve; • other road characteristics which affect the safety and adequacy of the pavement; • Ride quality, indicating the range of "perfectly smooth" ride to one where it my be dangerous to drive over the surface at the posted speed limit; • Structural integrity will be noted based on visual evaluation techniques of the apparent structural condition of each section; /9 i� Surface Condition Index Nz-ber will be assigned In order to rate the functional a,a of the surface. This can indicates A brand new pavement; a fairly nev Pavement beginning to show signs of very minimal distress, i.e., oxidation, slight cracking of ravelling; an older pavement in need of a chip seal or a slurry seal; an older Pavement that is beginning to show signs of significant distress; and d pavement displaying severe surface distress. Non- Phys1 ©1 Data • Designation as street, street intersection or alleyuayi • Frc A/Th, indlrati..g the assigned Units of the section; • Name of so • et; Section ha er; Street classlfication indicating function, such as, arterial or collector and, public. also, whether private or C. Distro s Inventory: In ;,ddttion to gathering general infocation on the entire pavement system to be studied, it cey le necessary to acquire more detailed data on those sections in need of repair prior to maintenance. 'Dais inventory recoais the extent and severity of such structutal defects as distortion, ravelling, cracking, alligator -type failures in caniunction with the pavement sutface survey. 's The following factors PL, recorded: G DISIORTICN: In13 structural defect is iomtifled by ratting, rippling, shoving, or corrugation in a pavement segment and 1s measured in square feet The severity level of this condition is eAtem'"ed by measuring the difference In the distance from where the Pavment "is" to where it is "supposed to be ". This moasurts'ant is obtained at the worst spot In the failed area. LIGHT Distorted 1/4" to 1/2 ". .MZD i Distorted 1/2" to 1 ". HEAVY Distorted more than 1 ". 10 V3 R7+.YILDC: Ravelling is expressed as a percentage of the total area affected and is defined as rho progressive disintegraticn of asphalt pa.-erant from the surfsce downward caused by t,4 dislodgement of aggregate particles. LIGHT Aggregate or bic9er has started to wear noticeably. h4DIUM Aggregate or binder has wum away and the surface ten:ture is moderately rougi and pitted. Loose particles generally exist HEAVY Extensive amount of aggregate dislodgement, surface is severely rough and pitted. FLDSHD)G: Flushing is expressed es a percentage and is characterized by the "bleeding" of free asphalt binder to the pavement surface. LIGHT Minimal bleeding evident. HIDIGHN Distinct appearance of free asphalt at surface. HEAVY Pavement surface appears "tacky" and wheels of moving vehicle sound as if they are riding over wet pavement. LINE CRACKS: Line cracks are straight aid are measured in linear feet. Such distress includes wheel track, construction joint, aid -lane, centerline, pavement edge, longitudinal and transverse cracking. LIM. Cracks loss Uan 1/4" in width. l4DID.Y Cracks 1/4" to 1/2" in width. HEAVY Cracks greater than 1/2" in width or cracks with curled edges and/or vegetation. -' U /L 7V RANDOM CRACKS: Such cracks ace meandering and are measured in linear feet and may include shrinkage cracks as well as other causes. LIGHT Cracks less than 1/4" iw width. mmrLDi Cracks 1/4" to 1/2" in width. HEAVY cracks greater than 1/2" in width or cracks with curled edges acrd /or vegetation. ALLIGATOR CRACKS% Such cracks connect to form small segments which look like alligator skin. Alligator cracking is measured in square feet. She failed area to be measured is assured to be rectangular in shape and extending one to two feet beyond the limits of the alligator cracking. LlQ'r Very tight segments. EL'DI 4 Loose segments which could be pried out with effort. HEAVY Very loose or missing segments and /or uneven surface and /or potholes. PATCHES: Settled patches, trenches, and utility cuts are to be measured in square feet. LIGHT 1/4" to 1/2" settlement. MEDIMI Settlement between 1/2" and 2". HEAVY Settlement greater than 2". Miscellaneous' other types of distress or information such as weathering, etc., are also measured during the inventory, to incites virtually all distress that will require maintenance prior to receiving a repair strategy, including: even RV gouges, motorcycle kickstand indentations and tree root daa+age. — d. Reports: is have found that the reports listed below ace the most useful, and will cover 991 of the needs which you nay encounter. Eaa flexibility of our program, however, allows for the designing of virtually any type of report. Generally speaking, the standard number ct reports available through the systen is in excess of seventy five (75) depending on the infomation desired. (12 Ov Jiew Resort ,1 detailed, written report summarizing the entire Program, total budget level, maintenance and repair strategies aud costs fo_ the tine frame desired is provided. Regular Reports Budget Report • Total budget breakdo.h (per year basis) for minimum 5 year Program. • Major maintenance and capital improvement strategies, as wall as, patching and repair costs. • Total costs for rehabilitation, and/or designated reconstruction. The following information is normally included in one manner or another in the report; Calendar /fLsmal year period. Listing by type of strategy or classification. Total quantities per section. Priority Report • Priorities for maintenance program based on cost - effectiveness, as well as, street classification and we of worst first- approach. • Shows effects of doi:g nothing or hot ccrpleting the scheduled maintenance. • Shows a listing in order of priority for all projects required in a particular year. The following information is normally included in the report; Section Naae/Locetion, Limits. Pavement Maintenance Program Type. Estimated Cost. Priority a,Nreber. 13/ 13 7S) Mwbmr List Re=P of the inventory information, including listings by: Alphabetical /Section Listing, Direction (4,s,e,W), Limits (From, Tb), Street Classification, Section Quant_ ties, M=ber of Lanes, Percentage, Condition, anr' Type of Improvements (Curb and Outter) , Percentage and/or Typo of Distress, WIs Quality, Surface Type, Drainage Characterise Surface Condition and/or Overall Condition Mapper /Rating, and structural Integrity. Annual Maintenance Programs • Identifies each section requiring maintenance /repair for each year, total quantities, mid approximate cost. • Fbrvatted such that it man be used as the annual maintenance plan and supplied to either a contracting fern or the agency's maintenance superintendent. The follvaing information is normally included in the report; Type of Maintenance Activity. Specific Year of Acti -city. Section Name. Section Limits. Route btmher. Ouantities. cost. Nmct Maintenance Activity by section Report Designates the next maintenance activity (including preparatory work required) and the year the work is scheduled, for each section in the system. The follmd g infomation is normally included in the report; A1PhabetiCel Listing. Route Mzber/Designation. Section Name. Limits. Quantities. Year of Next Pavement Maintenance. Estimated Cost Each Activity /Section. Total Cost for Section. 14 V7 Distress ravel Report • Includes a summary of the various amounts of distress for each section.. • rrY.•1.ud0s the type, quantities and approximate cost of repairs. The following information is normally included In the report; Route Number. Section Nraber. Section Limits. Next zheiduled Year for Maintenance. Section Itistory Report Inclui3s section histor.1 data and detailed Information regarding each individual segment. Cavditicn Distribution Report Provides a graphic display o. the distribution of CM's for each classification of street as well as Next Two Maintenance Activity's R oport Lists Us next two maintenance /rehabilitation strategies scheduled for each segment of pavement. Samples of some of the various types of reports are attached to this proposal. Candidate Streets For rbro Ltmpreh3naive R;raluation Lists the streets within the system, that based on certain condition parameters, are the segments worthy of more cvmorehensive analysis, such as doflection testing, coring ardor soil torings. Effect of Delayed Maintenance CNImt -if?) Four separate reports are availahle whit, demonstrate the effect of delaying scheduled maintenance on any or all portions of the system. Information provided Includes the anticipated increased costs, the affect on the overall cmditlon nrabor and next scheduled maintenance / rehabilitation required for each year of delay. 15 yg 7. Project level comprehensivo Praloatien: Upon completion of the network level study, those sections Of Paversnt identified as needing mare detailed analysis can be evaluated (if desire!) using a vmprehensive project level analysis, including deflection analysis (dyraflect). This evaluation is perfoeoed at additional cost. This type Of study is frequently done on a follow -uP basis, or subsequent to the initial system developnent. The following describes this additional analysis: a. IIrviraonental Analysis: This includes an analysis of local problems such as drainage, water table, cross fall, and other pertinent enviroranental matters. b. Surface oondition Sturdy T'ne Surface Condition Study will incl Is a canplete evaluation of surface cond4th,nm, noting both the severity and frequency of Cracks, deformations, failure areas and other surface dolects. The entire surface of the - ..venent will be evaluated and recorded for every 200' section. The Surface Condition Survey date ©fines the present surface condition for use in developing the oast effective rehabilitation strategies. C. PavWWt Section Analysis A Pavement Section Analysis will be conducted involving the review of data obtained throuch caring or soil borings or both, as warranted by the .uisting condition of the pave t. Analysis of these cores and soil borings will allow us to not only determine the actual structural section of the pavenent, but also to determine if the problems are assoclated with the subgrade, base, or surface of the structure. WOamic Deflection Analysis: A nendestnctive Dyramlc Deflection Analysis will be Conducted for each section using Carter Associates Dymflect. The deflectien analysis assists in detemaining new the paverent responds to loading. Owe this La known, it 1s Possible to Calculate how it will respond to the other loads that it will be subjected to In its futurs life. This Provides an evaluation of the effects of futare traffic an the pavement and the effects- of varying those traffic patterns. The Information will be used in the Dyaaic Deflection Testing and the Pa%a nt Section Evaluation Pottiena of our program. The Deflection analysis also detects isolated problem areas for the c_terminir., boundaries of various corrective actions, thus reducing costs for rehabilitation. iG e. Idmtlfieatlon of SnIn«anca Strategies: Ibis information will be used in a comprehensive anallsis to determine the present condition of the pavement, the causes for the condition, the future performance of the various sections, the rehabilitation strategies required for either a ten (10)) or twenty (20) year life, their costs and the most cost - effective rehabilitation actions. After the analysis is completed, the following information will be provided: • Pavement performance characteristics; • In -situ conditions of the pavanrnt systems; • Field data information; • Present condition of the pavement! • Alternate methods of pavement repair and their effects on the estimated level of serviceability; • Costs of various repair strategies; • Most cost- effective rehabilitation strate% for each section. As in the case of the network inventory, a meeting with City representatives will be scheduled to analyze the results of this evaluation. Result- of the analysis of materials sampled from the Pavement section will be used in determining certain rehabilitation alternatives, such as, recycling Options. The budgetary information resulting from this ovaluatlen can then be blended with the results of the net-work inventory. 4. Development of Overall Pavement Maintenance management Progtam: eased on the results of the network analysis, the pavement maintenance management program will be defined. This program will include overall maintenance strategies, procedures, policies, schedules, budgets and computer software (if desired). A meeting will be held with City staff at the completion of the inventory. During this session the Inventory results will be reviewed with emphasis placed on the analysis of the Condition Distribution [deports for each level of street /road and the results of Project Level A.aalysis, if utilized. The actual maintenance time tables will then be developed. - 17 sv i 5. DVAMaPIMIr AND l?CL L`SEMATI;ri OP SOF1Sn= Once the lrnnmto_y bus been completed, and meetings and discussions he a Lecn held, ce will then develop the computer softeare necessary to evaluate, edit and analyse the data develo to in the program. The City may then Purchase the softare at anytime and have a completely accurate, wand- naming grogram and database "an line" which insures the future success of t1e program. This software will: . Be established for Compatibility with the City IfiY -pC XT and a copy of D -base 2.43 will be provided by CAi; • Provide adequate doeaentation for tla operations personnel on how to collect and enter dat• and ensure accurate and timely reports; • Have provision for data security and safeguards for backup: • Provide menus and output reports in readable °user friendly" formats; • Provide adequA.e input error detection at the time data 13 mtered to ensure accurate results and an efficient error detection and correction process; • Provide ad.xivata documentat!on for management on the imPlerentation and operatlan of the systeas and tntsrprotaticn and use of the resilts; • Provide for updating and oodlflcallon of records., • Require single merles verses multiple entries to update single data !teas; • Be nndatable and modular so that the program can be expanded in the for= and additional mileage and ether features can be incorporated or deleted ms required. 18 S/ 6. CO DOCf TRAI iNa We will train dtsignatad nsrhers of your staff to properly conduct field survoys, enter data, develop carorter reports and butane familiar with all activities necessary to allow them to suxessfully Continue the program in the future. Staining in field inventory techniques will be provided by allowing agency personnel to travel with our field crew during (or participate in) thv actual field inventory work. In this way, your staff will receive hands -0,n experience by watching the inventory in progress and participating iu the field review. Training of personnel will again be wnducted at the completion of inventory work. All personnel will be famillarized with rating and eompater application methods as wall, awe software is purchased. Training and User Wnuals: To complement the training of your snff, we will also provide you with training and user manuals vhich provide detailed instructions on how to cond-tct the field surveys and rating procedures, as well as haw to use the computer software, onto software is placed "on- line ". e• . : ac.r..e` PAsults of the shdy, cvmr4uta with the appropriate documentation will be provided along with a find report (including an areclntive sannar /), and a formal presentation to agency Staff. A presentation can also be made to elected officials, if requested. 19 S'�L The following eitimate of fees has been daveloped consistent with the scope of work proposed. We realize that the final work program may vary once subsequent discussions have been held regarding the actual scope of services. Alternative Estnauted No. Description Fees 1. DEVELOPMENT OP PILOT PROGRAM NETWORK PAVEMENT MAIUCEM NT SYSTEM (PMS) - 1T1LI. IINE.MORY BY CARTER ASSOCIATES Carter Associates (CAI) will consult with your staff and develop a Notwutk Pavement Evaluation and Management System. CAI will perlorm all field inventory work, enter and analyze data, and develop a formal report for a total system consisting of approximately 125 dual lane miles. In addition, we will train up to three (3) of your personnel in the inventory techniques (during the inventnry) to ensure continuity between Carter Associates and City staff. This training will also include cur providing the City with Condition Rating Manuals for Future reference purposes. Should additional mileage (greater than 125 + 5 dual lane miles ) be studied, it will be invo(aed ae the rate of $175 per dual lane mile, following prior notification of and approval by the City. A. Define Program Parameters and develop system framoork ..................4 2,500 B. Conduct Network Inventory ................. 13,000 Co Develop Software /System ................... 3,850 D. Produce Final Reports ..................... 2,500 E. Training of City Staff .................... 1,000 TOTAL COST NET,r m SYSTEM:........_..$22,850 26 5 � 2. DLVEWPMINT CP PILCr PR=AM IISRWORR PMJQMIT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PMS) - PARTIAL INVM7ORY BY CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. (50/59 PV3q i CAI will prov!dc ill services listed previously, however, the City of Pandw Cucamonga will provide one (1) employee to assist in L'Ie inventory of the entire 125 dual lane mile system. Thic approach is referred to as our "50/59" plan, cinuce both CAI and the agency provide one (1) employee to the field toam. Agency personnel can be rotated ouch that ocre than one (1) individuul rece!ves the 'hands -on- experience" of the Inventory process. Tralnitq s DOCU=antatfen, as outlined in Alternative 11 are also included. A. Oefrne Program Prrmut,rs and develcp system framework ................$ 2,500 B. Conduct Network Inventory ............... 7,200 C. Develop Software /Systa ................. 3,850 • D. PrZd.:. -a Y;,el Reports .................. 2,5:0 E. Training of City Staff .................. 1,000 TOTAL C=ST - SIVSO INYSNTORY PLAN:.......517,050 3. SOfiTMM, TRAINING SESSIONS AND lfn7ERIAIS. Carter Associates will provide the computer program, basic user's manual and strategy editing manual, plus computer use training sessions (ono full day) to allow your personnel to operats and maintain the system in the future. TOTAL CDST - SOC'TNARE ONLY:.« »5 5,000 4. DEVELOFFUIT OF MA12rTZQa= AND REPAIR (MAR) SPDCIPICATICUS: A separate sot of Ma!utenance and Repair Specifications can be developed for future maintenance activitie3. TOTAL COST - M A R SPDCIPICATIONS: --S 3,000 27 (,L Based on the above estimates, therefore, Carter Associates will provide the Pavement Management System Complete with five (5) copies of the final report for a total rot- to- exceei fee as listed below :or each of the following alternan uve plans; Alternative A. Development 6 Implementation of a Network Pavenent Management System without Software .......$22,850 (1001 CAI Invrntory Plan) Alternative B. Development i Implementation of a Network Pavement Management System with Software ........... $27,850 Alternative C. Development a Implementation of a Network PavementNanagementsystevaithout Software .......517,059 (58/58 Inventory Plan) Alternative D. Development 6 Implementation of a Network Pavement Management System witn Software ........... S22,050 ADDITIONAL srimcEs If a system is desired that incorporates by Network and Pro) wt Level evaluation techniques, or if there exists a ca,.tlnulrg need for deflection analysis measurements either now or in future yearb, Carter Associates is available to provide such services at the rase indicated below. Project level - Co' reh"Wivo Analysis Per dual -lane mile (minimum 15 miles) ..... $ 500.00 28 66- OwE21 ASS=MTE S FEE SCHEDULE Personnel Standard Rate/Hour Project Manager S 70.00 Senior Engineer S 58.00 Staff Engineer 9 50.00 Lehi Field Engineer S 45.00 Senior Field Technician S 42.50 Field Technician 8 38.00 Graphics Designer $ 42.00 Graphics illustrator $ 38.00 Systeas Analyst S 50.00 C=Putet Progrannar S 35.00 Caaputer Technician S 35.00 Technical Writer $ 35.00 Senior Clerical 9 35.00 Clerical 9 28.00 Deliveries S 25.00 Pebrbursible Costs Cost r 20% 29 S9 67 Exhibit 'S" •Project Schedule DEYELOPMENTAND IMPLEMENTATION OFAPAYEMlEWNIANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PROJECT SCHEDULE =d �J �J TASK 1 DEFINE PROC. F.17U'JEFERS 5 DEVELOP' r� SYSTEJ FnA!IEWORX TASK2CONDUCT s�3I HETNVRKINYENTORY f ----y. +LL TASX D DEVELOP � zFTVfAR E1SYSTEy ♦�_� %.L TASX4PRODUCE IMAL REPORTS TASXSTRAINING OF _ CITY STAFF 77 %1 i I I I I I o Z 4 6 B 10 wmcS 67 1� Exhibit •C' 29 ITO C, CARTER ASSOCIATE; FE: SCHE= t@. mmL rumm 1TzCN stat7dard rr� i.' Personnel Pate/Pour Project Manages S 70.00 Senior Lgineer S 58.03 - Staff F}gineer S 50.60 f Lead Fiell Engineer S 45.00 Senior Field Technician S 42,50 Field Technician S 38.00 Graphics Designer S 42.00 Graphics Illustrator S 3840 Systems analyst s 50.110 1 Catputer Progra-mer S 35.00 Computer Technician 5 3!.00 Tectmical Writer Senior Clerical S 35.00 S 35.0 Clerical S 28.60 Deliveries $ 25.00 Retabursibie Cosh Cost 4 207 .i� 29 ITO C, DATE: TO: FROM BY: SUB,ECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT "all O J pp p D March 20, 1986 1977 City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of Final Maps, Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tract 11606, -2 thru -4 located on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad and bordering the west side of Deer Creek submitted by Glenfed Development Corp. and Grupe Development Tentative Tract 11606 was approved by the Planning Commission on March 11, 1981, for the divisior of 70 acres into 277 lots in the Low Residential Development District located on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad and bordering the west side of Deer Creek The developer, Glenfed Development Corp., is submitting agreements and securities to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Master Planned Tract No. 11606 Storm Drain 4 -4 Faithful Performance Bond: $554,000 $84,000 Labor and Material Bond: $277,000 542,000 Also, the developer, Grupe Development, is submitting agreements and securities to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Tract Tract Tract Master Planned 11602 11603 11604 Line 4 -N Faithful Performance Bond: $276,000 $318,000 5190,000 $220,000 Labor 6 Materiel Bond: $138,000 $159,000 $ 95,000 5110,000 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. continued..... 5-5, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Approval of Final Maps, Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tract Nos. 11606, -2 thru -4 March 20, 1986 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract Nos. 11606, -2 thru •4, accepting said agreements and securities and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said maps to record. Respectfully sutmi ed, 3 LBH:LB:jaa Attachments 'P 4" V/CIAIl rY MAP CITl Or rrC,I- TT 116ok _ - RANCHO CL'CANIO \CA TITLE- I- CCATIO-4 M42 ENGINEERING DIVISION EXIIIiMT -. A SG \LE• 1 P CITY GE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INPROVINENT AGREEMENT FOR *OAcnr No 11606 "Ada and entered into into 61nTCOn /0•e�n�aT +ithTt he prOrls90 nS agreement SYDdI•t11on pap Act df the State of cail(v n la, and of the app5f of ni OrdlnanCM of the City Of Ra.OhO Cucamonga, c AI if Or nil, a munlClpal COrporatior, by and between Said City, hat *in AftA; referred to as the City, and ctwrea n.r,tm.�.ne e • bl'tmrnla Garydvtlm• herel ry /tt re vrec to AS [nil are .t.. WITeESSE . THAT, WHEREAS, tale Oa, IODar satire, to develop certain real or 00arty In as la Glty AS shown 00 ills Conditionally aOprOred Subdivision Anon as Soar -r Nn 116o6 l and WHEREAS, Said -ity hat established Certain requirements to he met by •a,d Developer aS Orerequltite to ADp royal 01 tale SWwIvi,10n generally located at h eila east Of Harmn 11 01 et — Vlrterle Alden• ROW, said Oere TMEA[iORL, it I% hereby agreed by Said City And by loD er as fo'IO.S: 1 The Developer hereby s7rees to construct at Osreiaper•S upanic all Improvements descrlbem on Page 6 here- of Within teal re cor.ths ffoc the aNaotivP date hereof L This agreement Shall be effective On the date of the resolut l on Of ill* council of said City approving this agree. , nt This agreement Shall be In default on the illy Idilw- Ing the flrst annlrarSary date of sN Said ADO „1 unless a• exten- adcn of tbs has Own granted Dy d Clty AS heraimefter prorld. 7 The developer may ,,West an extension of time to Complete the terms hereof Su:h r,uest shall be Submitted t0 the City in Writing not less 'ban 70 days •more the expiration data hereof, and Shall contain A Statpaent of Circumstances race SS ltatlnq the eats -%toy Of time The City Small mere the right to ,ue+ the provisions of th S agreement, I^Cledlnq the CONS ruCtiOn standard%, CCtt *%tleat*, and iaprore-et security, and to require adlustmentf tWdreln It any substantial char.. has occurred during the tars he. eof a If the *,eloper fall, or neglects to COnply With the Dr ov1110r% of this agreement, the City Shall have the rtq ht at any time to Cause said provisions to pe not by any law ill means. fe And ems redo on recover from the Oe•eloprr and /or his Surety the Tull Cost and expense rotor Wad each l 5 The develop @, shall provide catered Water sett ire to ot of u10 de.elapment In accordance With the regulatfon%. stheruleS, Id Ides of tea CuCa. on Be County Water District 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation. Or removal Of any CamPOnent of any Irrigation rater System In cpnYllCt with construction of ♦e,ulred Improvements water the $atltfactlon of the City Englotar and the owner o1 sh tar system. K s -t- °Z Tracts and Cam/Ind. P.N. 7 lmOrovements requrrad to be constructed shalt Confirm to the Standard Drdwings and Standard Specifications of low City, and to the Improvement plan approved by and on file In the office of the City Engineer SaIC Improvements are tabulared on the Ca nstfuttlon and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated an Page d her a of, At taken fron the Improvement plans listed thereon by number The Developer shall also be responsible for Construc- tion of any transitions or other Incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed far safety and proper surface drainage Errors ar amdlsllanl a SCarerfd during ConstruCtin shall be Corrected wan the d vet Ion of the City Engineer Revised work due to tali plan madlfltatlont shall be covered by the provisions Of this agreement and secured br ink surety covering the original planted torts 6 Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work, all regulations listed thereon shall N observed, with at t th"On given t0 safety procedures, Control Of dust, noise, or other nuisance t0 the area, and t0 proper natlfi at10n Of publ, utilities and City Departments Failure to Comply with this section S'ull be Subject to the penalties provided therefor 9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal ,f all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -w&) witl a Or adjoining sold development resulting frim work relative .o said development 10 Mork done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion, the City shall have the right to Complete any and all work In the anent of unjustified delay in Completion and to recover all Cal! and expense ircirred from the Developer and /Or his contractor by any lawful mea a 11 So it Oeveroper shall at all times IOIIOv Ing dedlca tion of the str.tts and catements In sold subldivlsion, up to the Completion and acCeptanCe of sold work Or Improvement by laid Cl t Council, pre good and adeCuate morning to the traveling Public of each and every dangerous Condition existent in said street Or emsecent, and will protect the traveling public from such de fee tive 0 dangerous COndltlons Until the Completion of all Improvements, herein Incorporated on Page 6 , to be performed, each Of said strenH not accepted as Improvements shall be under the Charge of sold Developer Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the Co ndltlans contained In a temporary Street Closure permit, Issued by the City to 9l near whenever it 11 necessary to protect the Public a -Ing the construction of the Improvements heroin agreed SO be made 12 Parkway trees required to be planted shall be plant•] by the Developer after tithe- Improvement work, grading and Cleanap has been sample bat Planting shall be dome as provided by Ordinance In accord once rite the planting diagram approved by the City Community OevelOpm lnt Director The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all treeS 0 Hnted In good health until the and of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year titer planting, whlchevar is later tj The Developer ,s responsible for meeting all condl- tions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision -2- M, Map Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development, And for the maintenance Of all Improvements Constructed thereunder until the InprOvenent IS accepted for maintenance by the City and no Improvmm Ont Security provided hereinwith shall of W CASed before Such acceptance units• Otherwise Orr Ided and authortted by the City Council of the City 14 This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City. Or until 4 new agreement together with the required Improvement secarsty has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named and by resolution of the City Council save has peen accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released is The Improvement SaCurlty to be furnished by the Day a toper with this sgreenrnt shall consis• of the following abd Shall Da In a fore acceptable by the City Attorney A. To Secure faithful performance of this agreement 1 A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized Corporate sureties In t'e Pon and Content specified by Government Cede Section 6649^ 1 2 An Improvement security Instrument in the farm and Content specified by the City Attorney 7 A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved for securing deposits of public Monte% 6 To secure laborers and Materlalnen: I A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the for. and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument to the form and content specified t the City Attorney 7 A deposit with City of Morey or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer t0 the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerline Monuments end for furnishing centerline tee notes to the City The acquit of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment In full; or. If no value is Submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Clinstructlon and Bond Estimate contained herein Said Cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce• dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and wri•ten assurance of payment In full from the engineer or surveyor. 0 The required bonds and the priacipal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement 16. The Developer warrants that the impro,aaantk deserbed In this agreement trail be free from defeats 1, materials end workmanship Any and all port Nis of the lepreve- 0tnts foi.nd to be defective within are 11) year following the data an which the Improvements an accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security to A sum equal to ten percent (1021 of the construction _T. 6 mitt +rte or $200.00, whichever Is greater to secure the faithful performance of OrrelODer y ooligat,mnS as described In this para- graph The maintenance guarantee security shall also Secure the fal thful performance by the developer of any bbl lgatia- of the okee l moor to do Spec If led *art with respect to any parkYay maintenance assessment OtStr ICt Once the Improvements hire been accepted and a maintenance guarantee Security has been aCCfpted by the title, the Other lmprovemert security described In this agreement may be released provided that such release IS otherwise avthori+ed by the Subdivision map act and +my applicable City Ordinance 17. That the ^ eveloper shall take Out and maintain Such Uubl It IlibiIIty and property damage lusurance as hall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which nay arise because of the nature of the work or from OpirationS unier this agreement, whether Such operatiors be by himself or by my Contractor or subcontractor. or anyone directly or Indirec'ly employed by said persons even though Such damages be not cauted by the nhgl lgtnce of the Developer or any contractor or subcontrattor Or anyone employed by said persons The public llabllity and property damage nsuranrf shall list the City as addltonal Insured and directly pro +.•,t the City Its officers, Agents and emplpyseS, as well AS the Developer, his contractors and his Subcontractors, and all Insurance policies Issued hereunder shell so State The minimum amounts of Such insurance Shall be at follows: Contractor's Itch l l lty Insurance providing bodily In7erI, or death liability Belts of not less the $500,000 for each person and S1,000.000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage llabtl- ity limits of not less than $100,000 for each acci- dent or mccurrfsce with an aggregate limit of 5250 000 for claims which ray arise from the opera- tions of the Developer in the performance of the %irk herein provided - !000blle liability insurance cavering all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement providing bodily Injury liability limits of not to is than $200,000 for each person at' 3500,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $50.000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $100,000 which may arise from thk opera- tions of the Developer or his Contractor in performing the work provided for herein. is That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of Insurance covering the specified Insurance Each such eertt /,Cate shall bear an endorsement precluding the Cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any policy evidences by Such certificate. before the expiration of thirty (50) days after the City shill have received notification by registered mail from the Insurance carrier As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of Intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has subaitted •1e following described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: _a- `f' S FAITHFUL PEREORMANaE Type: Principal Amount-$ 554,000 00 Nape Ina address of surety MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: principal Amount$ 771,000 00 Nme and address of surety CASH DEPOSIT MONLMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: d S,600 00 Name and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type principal Ibou ^t:N /A Name and address of surety TO BE POSTED PAIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN t1ITNESS HEREOF the parties hereto have caused tease Presents to be duly uauted and acknowledged with all formalities required by law On the data, It to r to Opposite their slg ^aturef j Date 3 7C by ,Developer gnature r noted Date 6 sG by — ,Oeeelopx n a Lure J.D. gala, Vt. fr..td.ee anted Accepted: gATEC TU1fllll ATE OF r•�N... i. DE i.. x..l.. S& men dba boM Yaar solve mA Aa ukssymd, a Ndsry�pWc in id b sed 6Ltl.'psmufy steaern wry ,. au. 61psmnseylr...n bma U Irp,ed b ma m dm tmn a.maNC V y saw" m a M pwtaro.am rnttasd M .dprtl engmns,e n dov0aptlmex, -0 iNnedandeju low nbmatlW matapor isp Nf0dpusmsb bOsYrutlauZAts, dmOOYdd O%bL SSymura _ 61Na Yn b,elsdNaemg Mi�.tM6CM YO rpllYmfW I N e urn QUANTITY UNIT ITFM PRICE AMOUNT L.F. P.C.C. Curb - 12• C.F. 24e gutter 7.25 7.6f7 L.F. P.C.C. curb - B• C.F N• Cutter 6.00 7S'47T83 L.F. P.C.C. Curb only 5.50 L.F. A.C. bank 17 S.F. C• P.C.C. L1dewalb ]p�t1e S.F. Drive approach 1Att1_ . S.F. Be P, C.C. cross gutter (Inc, curb) C.T Street excavation C.T. Isported kMN&Amt 1e6.1t.•_ r.F. Preparation of subgrade 1 i S.F. Crushed egg• oak, 1lpar Inc, thick) TOR P.C. over 1100 tcns) 104 A.C. BOO to 1100 tons) TON A.C. 500 to 900 tons) TON A.C. under 500 tons) Roma S.F. A.C. 13- thick) S.F. Patch A.C. (trench S.F I• thick A.C. overlay EA. Adjust sever Manhole to Brad& [A. Adjust fever clean but to page FA. Adjust water valves to grade Te EA. street lights i L.F. Barricades (in[ersec. SSOO Nn) T_ L.F. 2 x 4• redwood header ,.F. 0.emval of A.C. pavmmt L.F. Removal of P.C.C. Curb L.F Rbnval of A.C. ben EA Street signs U. I (lectors mo posts L.F. Concreta block wall S.F. P taining wall TIM L.P Mpp=ppnpCWA SI• P.C.P. 17, TOCI•L.P CIAOX ICSCYOCCOM S7• R.C.P. lQQ_ L.F. 14- RCP (2000 0 —15_ L.F. 24• REP (!(1500 0 59 L.F. 74• Rbt RCP 0x0 0 , L.F. 11- ACT RCP 1200 P 4 EA. Catch basin Y . P T EA. Catch basin N . ft Be 2,70( [A. Catch basin M • 2SB' 1,90( �— [A. Lecal depression a, T (A. LWAI dapressioll 32'6' 700. �L. EA. k—%I Depression Be EA. .h� Stxuc7nta EA. Aerhol. I EA. Catch Sinn N . 30' �2 EA. Catch Leah w . 12' �— 16. .tn�ca•1l rx wcoalm 10' L.F RVnaC aa ion 12' S.F Lmdscapinq a Irrigation L.f. Roll curb IP.C.C.) Step Sign A2�5p 70.GTF.. T MIUMUO- -rwrf. 6r •6 , PM Mf 20.ndf.nn +.soo.nn �.z00.o0 7.ton.on s non nn 7m vin IOIAIp1ING INSPECTION FEE SUB TOTAL 4�97 49�7. �6 ESTOPATIN /OELINEAT)ION CASK -- _ CNTINGENCT COSTS 1"7 1 DEPOSIT NFUSURETTE(CA%) T6� _ LABOR AND MATERRI�ALCIOISD (5010 5i oeo 'Z "went to City of Anche Cute ga Nn�c!Ptl Code, Title 1, Chapter 1.01. adopting S&A WAUdin Canty Cade Titles, Chapten 1 -5, a cash ICstor&tion /dellneatlr ddpesft shall 1 Made, prior to lss'Wo of &M Engineering Csestruction Parolee CITv OF R JKM NCAMDWGA •y FNGINEER W BIVISIN ENROAUKAT PERMIT FEE SCHEME or Ivprovfelent: 7pALT tD. 11606 at {tbruiOLtl. —totes 1966- oatu t Y: Iie• & er Clty Oravinp o. MORE: Does not Include Curtmt Fa For writing molt a Parrett dgloslts QUANTITY UNIT ITFM PRICE AMOUNT L.F. P.C.C. Curb - 12• C.F. 24e gutter 7.25 7.6f7 L.F. P.C.C. curb - B• C.F N• Cutter 6.00 7S'47T83 L.F. P.C.C. Curb only 5.50 L.F. A.C. bank 17 S.F. C• P.C.C. L1dewalb ]p�t1e S.F. Drive approach 1Att1_ . S.F. Be P, C.C. cross gutter (Inc, curb) C.T Street excavation C.T. Isported kMN&Amt 1e6.1t.•_ r.F. Preparation of subgrade 1 i S.F. Crushed egg• oak, 1lpar Inc, thick) TOR P.C. over 1100 tcns) 104 A.C. BOO to 1100 tons) TON A.C. 500 to 900 tons) TON A.C. under 500 tons) Roma S.F. A.C. 13- thick) S.F. Patch A.C. (trench S.F I• thick A.C. overlay EA. Adjust sever Manhole to Brad& [A. Adjust fever clean but to page FA. Adjust water valves to grade Te EA. street lights i L.F. Barricades (in[ersec. SSOO Nn) T_ L.F. 2 x 4• redwood header ,.F. 0.emval of A.C. pavmmt L.F. Removal of P.C.C. Curb L.F Rbnval of A.C. ben EA Street signs U. I (lectors mo posts L.F. Concreta block wall S.F. P taining wall TIM L.P Mpp=ppnpCWA SI• P.C.P. 17, TOCI•L.P CIAOX ICSCYOCCOM S7• R.C.P. lQQ_ L.F. 14- RCP (2000 0 —15_ L.F. 24• REP (!(1500 0 59 L.F. 74• Rbt RCP 0x0 0 , L.F. 11- ACT RCP 1200 P 4 EA. Catch basin Y . P T EA. Catch basin N . ft Be 2,70( [A. Catch basin M • 2SB' 1,90( �— [A. Lecal depression a, T (A. LWAI dapressioll 32'6' 700. �L. EA. k—%I Depression Be EA. .h� Stxuc7nta EA. Aerhol. I EA. Catch Sinn N . 30' �2 EA. Catch Leah w . 12' �— 16. .tn�ca•1l rx wcoalm 10' L.F RVnaC aa ion 12' S.F Lmdscapinq a Irrigation L.f. Roll curb IP.C.C.) Step Sign A2�5p 70.GTF.. T MIUMUO- -rwrf. 6r •6 , PM Mf 20.ndf.nn +.soo.nn �.z00.o0 7.ton.on s non nn 7m vin IOIAIp1ING INSPECTION FEE SUB TOTAL 4�97 49�7. �6 ESTOPATIN /OELINEAT)ION CASK -- _ CNTINGENCT COSTS 1"7 1 DEPOSIT NFUSURETTE(CA%) T6� _ LABOR AND MATERRI�ALCIOISD (5010 5i oeo 'Z "went to City of Anche Cute ga Nn�c!Ptl Code, Title 1, Chapter 1.01. adopting S&A WAUdin Canty Cade Titles, Chapten 1 -5, a cash ICstor&tion /dellneatlr ddpesft shall 1 Made, prior to lss'Wo of &M Engineering Csestruction Parolee SUBOIVISION GUARANTEE 40 PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL M04U4E11TS) City Council City of Rancho CYcaedn9a P 0 Bd. 607 Rancho Cucamonga California 91770 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4 Article 9 Section 66:91 of the Goverment Code, the undersigned here]) a9rge that all monuments shown an the final mAD of TFUR= NO. 11606 are 2S pt San And furnished by [n! 4Y]a 1V101r S engineer or suf Vtyer an or before As Speclflyd I. the login s ar car ve for s a ........ .no agrees to furnish the notes therean •o complete all engineering red•Irementt 11111111d In Sec ,106 66497, Of the Oover.nent Coda The undersigned hands you herewith the sue or S s 600.00 AS A cash deposit, Slid deDOSI to quarmn[ee tune rbnuoen is .I I be set and the notes I.fnlshed at Above provided On Or before the date specified sad that the fdglneer Or surveyor .111 be paid by the undersigned It is further understood And agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to Complete the above requ Vexents withN the tive specified the City of Rancho Cucamonga a authorized to COVD late said requirements or cacti! them to be Completed anu the cast thereof is to be a charge Against said cash deposit, and the Ctty of Rancho Cuu -0h94 is a.tnonted co note tte necessary transfrr /rom faro cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund It is further agreed that If he undersigned does not present lei dente to the City COuMCiI that he has paid the engineer or sun eyor for the setting of the final monuments, and If the enylnetr or surveyor glues the not l:ea prescribed In Section 66191 of the Government Code. the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the Cash deposit harem made If the cost of C]mpleting said requirements exceeds the em0unt of the cbh deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference W nin thirty (SO) days after recnlvin9 written Statement from th! city of Rancho Cucamongb Specifying tnt ae0unt of the dl /t clence between the cash deposit and the actual cost ]f said rtqul rtments Cordially, m oases want C. M. IYG�- Subdivider vts ta,nt� . earn avb Address Date 3 � d� The deposlter Of record (for return of any portion Of the cash deposit) shall be ne Cn a b. Sac .w, CJ, 91416 Marne 1 caress NOTC: TO BE SU04ITTLO FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNE0 MAO CITY OF RAKCAO �UCAKONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT e0R TRACT I.J. 116OL KASTDK PUIP y.D a -N 51TINM DMIN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESL ^RESENT, that this A9rtement Is made and Rattled Into, In COaformn,m with the prowls1ant of the Subdivision Me, Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordlnane" of the City of eaathe Cucleorga. California. a muniClaal Coroutatlon or and between said City. hereinafter referred to as the City. bad yr m.a e Ii Le Carp nee tins ter re erred�to as t e Developer WITNESSETN: THAT, uHEREAS. said Developer desires to L161OP Cart" real property to I to City as shown or ait Conditionally approved subdivision known As 1 ,..N n e -N , and SSVPII DMIN WHEREAS said City has astabIished cercatn requirements I. to be set subdivision Boner allyvlo: tied as at py .tiel tart Of NevenvAponua sale s rwoun • ^MaW, THEREFORE, It Is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer As follow 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construcr At ofvwltlpian twelvtmmonths from theneffective date hereo 6 marl• f 2. This agreement shall be effective On the date of the resolutlnn of the Council of said City approving this agreement This agreement shall be in default an the day follow• tag the first anniversary date of said approval unless an eaten• Slam of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter proved. ed. B The Developer may request an extension Of time to complete the terms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City In writing not less than SO days before the aspiration datt eKeasitetlny tm and shall the extentiOfl Oft •e statement The City of shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, Including the construction standards, cost estente, and lmproveeent security, and to require edlustments therein If any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof C If the Developer falls or neglect$ to Comply with the provisions of this ayyre.Aent. the City shall hale the right at any time t0 cause meld provisions to be net by any lawful means. and thereupon recover from lot Developer and /of his surety the Ica 11 cost and expense Incurred S The Developer shall pruvide mitered water service to each lot of said development in accordance with the regulations. schedules, And feat of the Cu Camanga County Water Distr lot. 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, to relocation, or removal of any component of any Irrigation water tFatsat isf acttonct the Cons Engineer andr thel ownermOf muchnwater seta. 1• w / Tracts bad Cam/1111. P.W P Imprerteents required to be constructed Shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Sntclfftatlens of the City, and to the Impro,e.gnt Plan approved :y and on file In the office of the City Engineer Slid Improraaentt are tabulated on one Con s truCtlon and Band E$Mite, hot ally Incorporated on P 6 hereof, as taken free the InDrorement plans listed thereon by number The Developer shall olio be fesPOnslble for construe• Soon of any transition, or other incidental wart beyond the tract boundarles as needed for Safety and proper surface drainage Errors or ammisslons discovered during Constructfn shall be corrected upon the dl.ectlon of t1.4 City Engineer Revised wort due to Said plan medlflcatlo of fha'I De corergd by the viseis lorL Of Planned agreement and secured by ht;.' seer et/ Covering the original planned agreement 6 Developer from thee officee of Dthe Cis Engineer priori to start the wore; all reguta[ lens lofted anveen ,ha 11 be Observed, with attantton given t0 Safety Procedure,, central of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to Deeper notification of public utllI Slee and City Departments Failure to cam O y with this Section shill be subject to the penalties provided therefor 9. The Developer •hall be responsible for removal of all loose rock[ and other debris from Public rightf•of -ray within or adjoining said development resulting from wort relative to said development diligently 10. Yore done within existing street, shalt be to cmplee pursued and to all wor ke to thet event of Shall have aelirg in COO 0lotion, and to recover all cafe and eapensa •recurred from the Oeealepar and /or MS contractor DY any lawful means It Said OeraloPer shall at all tines following dodoes. Sion o1 the 'treats and ellrmants In fold subldlrislon, up to the cam Dle HOn and acceatance of said work or lopror event by said City COUnCiI. 9118 good one adequate warning to the trare'in Dubuc of each and every do A gerous condition ea htent to fold street or eat Went, and w111 protect the traveling public fro, such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the coepletlen of all Inprevements. herein incorporated nn peg* 6 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as lmprorements Shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said DereloPsr WAY Cie$, all or a portion of any %treat subject to the cendltlons contained In a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City En Inter, whenever ft fi necessary to protect the pu.11c during tAhe construction o/ the lmprorementi herein agreed to ea ad* lY Partway trle, raqufred to be Planted shall be plan eed by the Developer after o[nor Improvement work, grading and Co. anuIs he' been completed Planting ,hall be done ee provided by Ordinance In accordance vltn tee plan AD diagram a Dpros d by the t "ty Community Oar eloDment 0l rector The OtvQIOOer shall be responsible for maintaining all ore.. planted In good health until the end of the guaranteed mNntenance period, Or for one year after planting. wh clever is later 1J. The Developer lS responsible for meeting all condo. Slant eetabilshea by the City pursuant to the Subdu l Stan .2. 7 Mee Act, City Gedlances, and this agreement for the derelopCtnt, Slid for the maintenance of all Inproreunts constructed thereunder until the Improvement Is accepted for maintenance by the City. and no Improvement ttCUrlty provided herelnulth shall be '!leased before such acceptance umless otherwise provided aid Authorized by the City Council of the City i/. This 89- eement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee seturi ty hirelrafter 4us Cribed has besn relelsed Sy the City. or until a new all eement together with the required Improvement se Culfty has been submitted to the City by a SUCClisor to the herein named, and b- resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and his agreement and the Idardlentnt security therefor hat bean re.aased is The 160101ewent security to be furnilhsd by the Dart lnpar with this 491e80tnt shall Consist o• tilt follcwing no shall be in • fare acceptable by in• City Attor..yl A. To secure faithful performance of th agreement 1. A t no or bonds by one or more du y authorized Cleporate suretits in ina form and content WeCiflen by Gave... ant Code Section 66199.1. 2. An Imprgrenent Sa:urlty Instrume^ n the form and content specified by the Cit tornay. ]. A deposit with the City of gone or nalotlable bonds of tee It it approved for securing deposits of public mwnle. 6. To secure laborers and materials.: 1 A bond or bonds by one or cart duly authorized corporate sureties in the for. and content specified by Government Coda Section 66199 1 2 An improvement Security Instrument In the fore and content specified by the City Attorney. 0 A deposit with City of money or negetlable bonds of the tide approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose Cg rtificata appear: upon the Final map for the tettlnyy of all boundery, lot corner, ono street centerline monuments and for furnishing contorting tie notes to the City The amount of the deposit may be any Amount certified by the en)Ineer or survtypl as acceptable payment in full; or, if no velum 11 submitted, the oath bond shall be cf shorn an the Construction and good Estimate contained herein Said Cash depaslt .p be refunded as soon " proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the Centerline tie notes and written assurance of Payment to full from the engineer or surveyor D The requI red bonds and the pr l me Ipal "aunts thereof are set forth dl. Pegg 6 of this agreement The described In this a9re"int !Ball warrants be /r" from i defectf.�rn in materials "d wortmaneh 1p Any and ell portions of the Improve. sent, /Ounit t0 be it dire wtlhln One (1) year /01IOYIeq the data re which the Improy OR, s are accepted by the City stall be Cite red or rep HC" by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Oerelgpar (hall furnish a maintenance 2uarentee security I. • sum tqu.1 to ten percent (10%) of the construction ). 7/ astlute or S200 OC, whichever It greater, to secure the faithful performance of OevQIOper•S obligations as described In this par&. graph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Dove l Oper Of any obligation of the Developer to do tpeclflad work with respect to any parkway flint Nlance ass OSSaent district Once the Improvements have been ace opted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other Improvement security described In tris agreement as' be released provided that such release Is otherwise authorlted by the Subdivision Nap Act and any applicable City Ordinance 11. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such Public liability and property damage Inturance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor perforatog wort covered by this agreement from Claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operatlors under this agreement, whether such opsestlant be by himself Or by any Contractor or subcontractor, Or anyone directly or Indirectly em D,oyed by said persons, even though such d1449es be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor Or anyone employed by said persons The public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as additonal Insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and tapl•vves, is well as the Developer, his contractors &mad his Oubot ractori. and all insurance policies Issued hereunder shall 30 State. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be is follows: A. Contractors liability Insurance providing bodily In ury Or death liability limits of not toss the 5]00,000 for each person and 51,000.000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage tiabll. Ity limits of not less than 5100,000 for seen acct. dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $250,000 for claims which may Arise from the opera. t1Oes of the Developer in the performance of the wet herein provided B. • Am omoefle liability Insurance covering all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement prow lding bodily Injury liability limits of not lets than $200,000 for each person And 1100,000 for each accede nt or occurrence, and property deals, liability limits of n -t less than $50,000 for eacr accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not 1 Ass than $100.000 which may arise fro. the opera - t10ns Of the Developer or his Contractor 1n Performing LM wart provided for herein, Ie. That before the eaecutlon of this agreement. the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates Of Insurance corerinq the specified Insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an andorse,aent precluding the cancellations. Or reduction in coverage of in policy evidences by such certificate, before the expiration ov thirty (10) days after one city shall have received notification by registered mall from the insurance curter As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and Of intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the follow", described Improvement security, and has affixed his s19114ture hereto: 7vD FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Am0unt:1e1.00o.00 Same and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PATNENT Type: Principal Asount:se2.oao.0o Abet and address Of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION T1pe: Principal Amount: N/A Bane and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE DT THE CITY IN WITNESS HERCOF, the partial Nereto have Caused these presents to be daffy O'aputad end Acknowledged with all fO reallt as required by law on th dates let forth opposite their stgnatu•rs Date by ,Developer g azure t •r vaaw rr.rm.ak Data by lam—. ,Developer gnaturr Orrin v. �. rrra erns IRPORATION printed COlaarY Or �• .... r.. SI darn r.• end Orbs ara F w.bgwm ML'Y I1mtl b And b bin prM prywN mpwy r,a r. r11 N r ri o op. ft r b4aw prvwwbmyOaw.mw, Owou, b r..r.r 11=1 73 RESOLUTION NO i=POM 8� - �a- f RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NOS. 11606, -2 THRU -4 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract Nos. 11606, -2 thru -4 consisting of 277 lots, submitted by Glenfed Development Corp, and Grupe Development, Subdividers, located on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad and bordering the vest side of Deer Creek, his been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHFREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. ROW, THEREFORE, r.E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 75Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician owl SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for CUP 85 -14, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue, submitted by The Muller Company CUP 85 -14 was approved by the Planning Com, ssion on September 11, 1985, for a Master Plan and Phase I of the development of 3 office buildings and 4 industrial buildings located on the northwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue. The developer, The Muller Company, is submitting an agreement and sect..ity to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $78,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $39,000.09 A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting said agrees znt and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Respectfully subm,At w 11 ✓- LBH:LB: as Attachments 7s Nuftaft. CITY OF RANCHO CUCARONGA IMPROSEYENT AGPEEMERT FOR CUP a5 -14 CNOW All yEN By THESE PRESENTS: That this aggreement Is made and entered into, it conformance with the Provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of Callfornla, a municipal cOrporatlon, hereinafter rderr- ad to as the City, by and between said City and Muller Company hereinafter referred to as the Developer THAT WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain rest •reperts In said City 'dcated at the northwest corner of Archit4ld Avenu• and Nin h Street; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be not by said Developer as prerequisite to granting n final approval; and WHEREAS, the *IOCdt'pe of this agreement and posting of Improvement securi I hereinafter cited, and approval by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equly alent to prior oospleticn of said requ lresents for the purpose of securing sold approval NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed oy and between the City and the Developer is follows: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all laprovements described on page 4 hereof Within 12 months from the data hereof 2 TA's agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of laid City approving this agreement This agreement shalt oe in default on the day follow. Ime the first annlverse^y date of said approval unless in exten- sion Of time has been grantnd by said City as hereinafter Drovld- ed j Tl,e Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreemen , In Writing not less then 70 days prior to the default date, and Including a statement of :Ircuestances of necessity fnr additional time. In considera- tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the prolix Ions hereof, Including construrtion standards cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when Warranted by substantial changes therein 4 If the Developer fills or neglects to Comply with the provls'ons of this agreement, the City shall have the right it any time co cause said provisions to be competed ey any law- ful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or her Surety the full cost and expanse incurred In so doing 5 Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel- oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any Work within the public right -of -way, and the ceveleper suall conduct sucn work in full complla • with the regulations contained therein bon- coepllance may result In stopping of the wort err the City, and assess sent o/ the penalties provload 6 Publec rigght -of -way Improvement wart requ'red shall be constructed In con with approved Improvement plans, Standard - Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall inrlude any transitions andlor other Incidental Work deemed recess,y for drainage or public safety Errors or oaulislons discovered during construe- 1100 Ouall Street, Suite 217 Newport Beath, CA 926607/ / {c Lion shell be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer, karlsen work due to said Plar mods /IC at,Onf shsii be covered by the provlflons of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original Planned varks 7. York done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly Pursued to coepletlon; the City shall Irave the right to complate any and all work In the evert Of unjustified delay in Pletion. and to recover aor ll COIL and expense incurred from the eloper and /or his contract by any lawful weans 8. The Developer shalt be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any component of any Irrigyation water svftem In conflict with the required work to the sails faction of tFe City Engineer and the owner Of the water system 9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of alt loofa rock and other debris from the Public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall Plant and maintain Parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director I1. The Improvement security to be furnished by the Derwlocer to guarantee COOPletlOn Of the terms of this agreement shall be fuuJect tp the approval of the City Attorney The prin- c1D11 am0unt Of said Improvement security shall not be less than the amount Shown: 77 2 CMUMM. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: $78,000.00 Nana and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Principal Amount: $79,000 00 Nine and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: TO RE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF. the parties hereto hall ,used thaAe presents to De duty executed AnJ acknowledge with all formalities required by Ian an the dates :et forth opposite their signatures. Date by , Developer Signature Printed /Oat• by . Developer J gna ure J r n e Accepted City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation 0y: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Approved: y orney DEVELOPER'S SIFNATIRES MUST BE ROTARIEED 7I 3 ("Est QUANTITY UNIT CITY OF RAN= CUCJIWNG.1 PRICE_ - EBGINEERING, DIVISION L.F ERCROACNM[mr PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE For Improrment ArddLeld Aw. t Ninth St. (ARC Sycdvelosv C5 nterl Dale: 1 -21-66 ayutc -3 /: N TBInq File Reference: City no. IWb c . 1 J.N. 567 P.C.C. cure onlr 5.50 ROTE: Does net Include MICAS Fee Far _ L.F Writing posit Or pavenent deposits QUANTITY UNIT [TEN PRICE_ PROFIT L.F P.C.0 cure - 12. C.F 24• Butler 7.2S D09 L.F P.C.C. cure - B• C.F 24• Buster 6.00 1.251.09 L.F P.C.C. cure onlr 5.50 _ L.F R.C. tom 4.50 7ISS7ir SJ /• P.C.C. sid alt 1.75 6W a 5555- S.F Drive approach 2.SO 3,977.50 S.F at P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc curl) 1.40 WA C.T. Street eauvatlw 1.50 C.T Imported eseanteent 1.50 _ S.F Preparation of su0yade 0.15 S.F CrisheE a99• Doe (Dar inch thick) 0.45 TOR A.C. Nowt, 1500 tons) 27.00 TON A.C. (900 to 1200 tons) 3S.00 TON A.C. to 9M tons) 15.00 TON ((500 A.C. under 500 tons) 60.00 SJ A.C. (5• thick) 0.55 MIT-- SJ Patch A.C. (trench) 1.75 ]55.15 S.F 1• thick A.C. overlay O.TD 5- EA. Adjust O.T.E. eaM01e to grade 250 AD 250.00 EA. Adjust sever clean out to grade 15' JG EA. Adjust water valves to grade 7 .01 R- EA. Slrtit ll hll IDOO.O1 P.OM.oO L.F Barricades I ntersec $SOO sin) 1.00 L.F 2 A A• redwood header IJS 20T-- S.F Reaoral of F.C. P"eaenl 0.55 16� L.F RmOVaI u/ P,C.0 curb 5.50 699.7n 77gT.ii S.P. Removal Of 4' aldewalR 0.70 1.601.79 EA. Street Igns 200.00 -_ EA. Reflect, -s and posts IS.DO L.F Concrete block wall 25.00 S.F Retuning wall 20.00 TOM Aggregate bate 7.OD C.T Concrete structures 425.0D -- L.F IB RCp (2000 0 29.00 L.F 21• RCP (1500 0 55.00 L./ 26• RCP (2075 D 49.00 L.F 4B• RCP (12CJ 0 76.00 -- EA. Catch basin W • 4' 2000.00 -- LA. Catch basin v • S. 2900.00 EA. Catch basin R • 22' 4500.00 LA. Local depression a- 500.00 EA. Local depression 12' 1000.00 _ EA. JuNctlo.1 structure 5000.00 EA. Outlet structure, Std 1506 1500.00 7- EA. Outlet Structure, Std 1507 500.W iii EA. Guard posts 40.00 L.F Guard panel (uood) 25.00 70 -- L.F S9vcut 2.00 - 4 B.,T- EA. Headwall (As- wIN) 1700.00 Li P.ewcod heaSr 1.75 77035M. S.F Undscaptnyy 6 Irrigation 2.75 L.F Poll curb 1P.C.C.) 7.50 Tim L.F 5.16' drain pips AlhaeErs F•amGCv 9470 3.25 INGINEVIPS INSPECTION FEE 4 74550_ SUB TOTAL 70 999.74 •RESTORATION DELINEATION CASH I'WDO CONTINGENCY COSTS - /!W91- DEPOSIT IREFUNDABLE) FAIINNL PERFOUTARCE BOTD IIOOS) 77100'1-00 - 11DIUMENTATION SURETY (CASH) LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND ISM) 3 •MSUant to City DB a Rancho Tit) Ncaaon9a municipal awe, Title 1, Olapter 1.06• epositllq Son u Berwdelm COUnt7 Coax Titles. [engine: 1 -5, a earn reown Per in /delllkatlon deposit shalt M aaade prior to Issuance of an Engineering Camtructlln Permit. a.._ b,elad WILL 7F SIGNATURE ADDENDUM Attached N and forming Part of TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY PERFORMANCE BOND NO 5340 -5S -55 RANCHO TECHNOLOGY ASSICIATES, a Callfernis general Parinarshlp. Pelnclpal by OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT FUND 111, a California limited partnership, Coneral Parser by OCCIDENTAL LAND RESEARCH. a California genml Partnership, General Partner! By m «Ler, sera By J.M H. Cack.r. General P.,-tncr by MBB 51 PARTNERS, • California Pen1101 011 w 011, Attached to and forming part of TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY LABOR t MATERIAL BOND NO. 524E -95.91 RANCHO TECHNOLOGY ASSICIATES, a California general partnership, Principal by OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT FUND id. a California limited partnership, General Partner by OCCIDENTAL LAND RESEARCH, • California general partnership. C"ral Partner By. m l / / �_ / enereT f.. ,War By Johr, H. Decker, enera artner by MOB 91 PARTNERS, a California general parl.,01p. General for ner By By By 8/ RESOLUTION N0. 2E7- 20-$5R o1, —4° 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 85 -14 WHEREAS, has S for h O itsconsideration an Improvement Agreement executed So March 20, 1985, by The Muller Company, as developer, for the improvement of Public right -at -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP 85 -14; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by goad and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said her Security authorized signasaid the Improvement Agreementpon b halfdof the the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: every u e et, ty er f roy ng, ayor Fl- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract No. 11781, located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue submitted by Roy E. Daly Construction, Inc. Tract No. 11781 was approved by the City Council on February 6, 1985. The developer, Roy E. ,aly Construction, Inc., submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the : onstruction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $92,000.00 Labor rnd Material Bond: $46,000.00 At tnis time, the developer is requesting approval of a twelve month extension on said improvement agreement. RECOMtENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Improvement Extension Agreement and Security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Respectfully submitted, LBW:LB:Jaa Attachments M E CITY TE RAN010 CIIWRtl1W INIMDEAT EXTENSION AIiEEHENT rift TRACT 11781 RROB ALL SHE" By THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement Is wide and entered into. In canforeancl with the P10141009 of the Subdivision Hap Act of the City of RanChO Cucarpnga, California, a aenklDal corporation. DR and between Ua L10 City, d o 11 hereinafter referred to O the Cl ty, and Rol E. Daly Constrnrr•• Inc. re /erred to as the Developer WITHESSETH: THAT. WHEREAS said Developer entered Into an troroveeent agreement with the City n a redulflte to issuance of bulldings permits. and YIEREAS, said Developer datlres in extension of tied to Cosplete the tares of the said imorovemenc agremnt. now THEREFORE, It Is hereby agreed by the City and by Said Otrelaper as follows: 1. TM coplatim date of the taros of the slid Improvement a reenent Is herby eatmdad by • period of :2 ninths from the dab. of City Council approval Of said agreement. 2. Increase In ieprarmnt securities to reflect currmt lara•ment casts shall be furnished by the diveloper with this agreement and shall be aperaved by tht City Attorney. Z. The rewired bond and the addict ... I printlpal Nppnts thereof Are sat forth on the attached sheet. 0. All other tens aM Conditions of the Lid iaprovment agreement Shall ,main the sea. As evidence of Vnderst ending the provisions Contained hereln, end of Intent to Csolly with Sage. the Developer has submitted the below described I"mvmnt security, ant has affixed his signature hereto: FAITWM PUV&rJ ARCE .110 ��// Description: Additional Principal Mount: �j� Surety: Address: HATERIAL AID LABCR BOND Description: Additional Principal Mount: 1/0 Surety: Address: Additional Cash Deposit CASH DEPOSIT M*Rf alKG 8610 MIRTDLUM 011RA TEE Boo p•tntiilal Axunt: �.».... e. »C. ...;MN.t:.t.... of the bithesCity. . » » »..» ». CITY OF NM610 CUCAYXIW OE1ElOP'�� CALtFOR41A, a sunlcipal corporation By: --7an to RtC"Ts'�— Attest: rev y ROTE: /DEVELOPER'S SIOWNRE NAT BE NOTARIZED 8i RESOLUTION NO. E83-28 84R I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRAIT NO. 11781 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on March 6, 1986, by Roy E. Daly, Construction, inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically describea therein, and generally located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, between 113th Street and Highland Avenue; and 6'HEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the tenv, thereof, is to be done to conjunction with the development of :aid real property as is to Planning Commission, Tract No. 11781; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is Identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Extension Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. .13SED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King. Mayor M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Street Name Change of Dorado Court to Eldorado Court Attached is a letter from Lewis Homes of California, developers of Terra vista, regarding the accidental misnaming of Dorado Court. The owners of properties along this street have been using the name Eldorado Court, which is how the street is signed at the location shown on attached Exhibit A. Also, safety personnel have recognized this street as being named Eldorado Court; however, the legal name on the subdivision map is Dorado Court. To avoid confusion for safety personnel and citizens now living on the street, Lewis Homes has requested the name change. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution approving the street name chr -ige of Dorado Court to Eldorado Court. Respectfully submit d, PR:J :sr Enclosure TERM WSTA RE C44VFD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVCTIC 1 E"C' -rrpihs February 13, 1986 Mr Paul Rougeau Senior Civil Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: DORADO /ELDORADO COURT Dear Mr. Rougeau In Tract 12364 in Terra Vista, there is a street for which the name of record is Dorado Court. Somewhere along the line, this street started being called Eldorado Court, to the extent that the street sign reads " Lldorado Court," and the residents are under the impression that is the name of the street It is our understanding that the Foothill Fire Protection District does not view the name Eldorado Court as creating confusion or impairing efficient emergency service. Therefore, we request that you initiate appropriate actions for City approval of this name change. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, C S. Chris Bradford vv Administ ^ative Assistant SCB:kr 650t'2) 1156N Wwlam Are PO Boa 670 Upland CA 91786 (7m gas-0971 R Oorelaped by L"a Hpj v i i� TFRRA VISTA February 14, 1986 William Jocqulmsen San Bernardino County Assessor's Officc 172 West 3rd Street 3rd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 Reference: Tract 12364 Rancho Cucamonga Dear Bill -irk EC EVVED , ,. 1 , ..,. 1.17 , RANCV0 ULVONCA V :" HR-M, D'V'S'0:l I'm sorry about the confusion on the street name in Rancho Cucamonga but the following Is a list of the lots, how they were recorded The correct street name Is Eldorado Court (one word), PARCEL NUMBER LOT TRACT 1077 -12 -115 23 12364 1077 -12 -116 24 12364 1077 -12 -117 25 12364 1077 -12 -118 26 12364 1077 -12 -119 27 12364 1077 -12 -120 28 12264 1077 -12 -121 29 12364 1077 -12 -122 30 12364 1077 -12 -123 31 12364 1077 -12 -124 32 12364 Yours truly LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA Robert A Lee Authorized Agent RECORDED ADDRESS 7376 Eldorado Court 7370 Eldorado Court 7364 Dorado Court 7356 Eldorado Court 7360 El Dorado Court 7347 Eldorado Court 7353 Eldorado Court 7363 Eldorado Court not yet recorded 737S Eldorado Cnurt BAL:dp CC: Paul Rougeau, City of Rancho Cucanonga / 1156N MamacWeef Dennis Michael, Foothill Fire Protection District PO Bo, 670 Upland CA 91766 17141985 0971 X" De"IOM by tew,s HWfs TERRA VISTA February 14, 1986 Mr and Mrs Jefferson Hill 7353 Eldorado Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference: Lot 29, Tract 12364 Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr, and Mrs. Hill: Representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga have discussed the problem of your street name with the Foothill Fire Protection District and have decided the name will remain unchanged. This was done on your behalf to Insure that you will receive the services you have come to expect both from your City and from the local Fire Protection District. Additionally, Lewis Homes has Informed the local Postmaster and the County Tax Assessor's office that the correct street name Is Eldorado Court. On behalf of Lewis Homes, I would again like to extend our apo ogies or the confusion and any Inconvenience this may have caused you Yours truly LEWIS H0161ES OF CALIFORNIA Robert A Lee Authorized Agent BAL:dp CC: Paul Rougeau, City of Rancho Cucamonga Chief Dennis Michael, Foothill Fire Protection District William Jocquimsen, San Bernardino County Assessor's Office Kay Matlock, Lewis Homes John Meicher, Lewis Homes 1156N %t u ta.n Ave PO Oo. 670 Upland CA 91785 (714) 965 0971 DMIO CI ov Lewis Homes G�Jj RESOLUTION NO. tOa- 26"6iR 6(- - %S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FINDING THAT THE NAME OF A STREET SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH HEREINAFTER SHOULD BE CHANGED AND DESIGNATING A NEW NAME FOR SAID STREET A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 34091.1 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Whenever the legislative body finds that , the existing name of any city street should be changed, the legislative body may adopt a resolution designating a name for, or change the name of, such street." (ti) Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference is a map indicating the location of that certain street located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga presently named Dorado Court (hereinafter referred to in this resolution as "said street). (iii) As the result of new construction activities, mispronunciation, and incorrect construction signing of said street, it is generally believed to have the name Eldorado Court. (iv) It is the desire of this City Council to maintain continu"ty of street names within the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to preclude confusion of safety personnel and citizens, with respect to street names. (r) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. This Council hereby finds that the existing name of said street should be changed to Eldorado Court. 3 The name of said street hereby is changed from J„rado Court to Eldorado Court. 4 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall promptly forward a certified copy of tnis Resolution to the ward of Supervisors of the County c' San Bernardino and to the postmaster of the Rancho Cucamonga Post Office. 9 EX1 -11 [RD 17 SITE r NAME eJAAM6E F &Oh\ DORAOO CA. TO E.LW2A00 G}. W Q 1 A 10 64 1 191 I TR, I t T N 0�5�..IW' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAA10 \GA �. LNGIVEERING DIVISION T bt>r 1` I++,VI — 19" VICINITY AIAP 9i 1 Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion D.R 84 -02 - located on Rochester Ave. at 8th Street DEVELOPER: Lincoln Property Co. 19752 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 225 Irvine, CA 92715 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $140,000.00 The required road improvements have bean installed and it is recommended that Council accept said improvements and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $140.000.00. Resp4ctfully Su mitted, LBH :bc a RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIGt P. 0. Ban 007 Rancho Cucaaonga, Californiaa 91770 WHEN RECCROED NAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCN 3XGA P. 0. Boa 807 Ranch Cuca"a. California 91770 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned Is an Inner of an Interest w estate In the hereinafter described real property, the natMn a of Wen tnterest or estate Is: O. R. 84-02 2. The full woe and address of the undersigned oener Is: CITY Of RMOM CUCAPCNW. 5120 -C base Line Road, P. 0. Boa 807. Rancho Cucamngt, California 91770. 7. On the 20th day of March, 1986, there as cmpleted mM the hereinafter described real property the wrt of leprovenent set forth In the contract doc,ueentf for: 0. R. 84-02 A. The nacre of the original contractor for the wrn of fayroveaeot as a whole was: LINCOLN PROPERTY CO. S. The real property referred to Main Is Situated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San 601nardtno, California, and Is described as follon: LOCATED Of NOCHESTER AVEWE AT BM STREET CITY Of RANCHO CUCAYOWA. a aunicipal corporation. Omer Lloyd 8. Hubs%. City Engineer ra A ems. RESOLUTION N0, 403 ?? ?OR &e T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR D. R. 84 -02 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for 0. R. 84 -02 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: --Te7rry i ngT ayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut a et, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, y Clerk W CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA STAFF REPORT PATE: March 20, 1986 u� 1'0: City Council and City Manager Lm FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, 'ity Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 9670, located on the northwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue submitted by Santa Anita Development Corporation Parcel Mao 9670 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 22, 1986, for the division of 32.60 acres into two parcels in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District located on the northwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue. Improvements are to be constructed prior to development of the parcels. A letter of acceptance has been received from Cucamonga County Hater District. C.C. &R 's have been approved by the City Attorney. RECOMMEHDATIO.Y It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9670, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to cause said map to record. Respectfully submitted, Enclosure 95 �I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA lisle; �f GCO2' Ic Paris C ENGINEERING DIVISION � T M FOOT N 1 LL BLV O . W W AF ARROW NWY. Y W 'jam r— 3 flTH ST 8 BUFFALO W AYE h "TN ZT. �I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA lisle; �f GCO2' Ic Paris C ENGINEERING DIVISION � T M RESOLUTION NO.- E93-2i -W V `'° - � / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9670 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9670) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9670, submitted by Santa Anita Development Corporation and consisting of two parcels, located on the northwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue, being a division of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 7797 as shown on a map filed in Book 80, pages 29 -32 of Parcel Maps, records of San Bernardino County, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 9670 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements estaollshed as prerequisite to approval of the °inal map by tie City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 9670 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut a et, ty erk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adapted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day of *, 19** Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancno Cucamonga, California. every A. Authelet, City Clerk q? CITY OF RANCHO CUCADIONG4 STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician 1.7 0 0 0 im SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 9612, located on Foothill Boulevard between Haven and Aspen Avenues submitted by Barton Development Company Parcel Map 9612 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 22, 1986, for the division of 13.22 acres into three parcels in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District located on Foothill Boulevard between Haven and Aspen. RECOMMEHDATIJN It is recommend_d that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving pH 9612, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to cause said map to record. Respectfully submi LBH AttacKnents m CITY OF RANCHO PROJECT PARCEL MAP 9612 CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION 9 EXHIBIT:'^" % 1 RESOLUTION N0, e91-t&M G D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9612 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9612) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9612, submitted by Barton Development rompany and consisting of three parcels, located on Foothill Boulevard between Haven a.id Aspen Avenues, being a division of Parcel Map 1963, as per map recorde, in Book 82, pages 32 and 33, in San Bernardino, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 9612 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 9612 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASS 3, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King. Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET. CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held an the * day of *. 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Auth—eTiF—ETt—Y-dTe—rV i /oo The City's 1985 -86 Capital Improvement Program includes three traffic signals at the following locations: Arrow Route at Hellman Avenue, Vineyard Avenue at Ninth Street and Base Line Road at Beryl Street. These signals are proposed for funding from the S8325 Gas Tax account. The fourth signal located at Haven Avenue and Church Street will be required to provide safe access to a great many new residences in Terra Vista upon the completion of the eastely extenticn of Church Street, the cost of this signal has been covered by Systcm Dcvelop.cnt fees, paid as a result of the building of the Terra Vista Homes. A traffic signal at Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue will serve growth which has occurred on the west side of Haven Avenue, as well • new apartment units east of Haven Avenue. This signal will also serve the traffic from a single family residential developnent which will occur on the north side of Lemon Avenue, east of Haven Avenue. The cost of this traffic signal will be covered by the system fees paid as a result of these new units. Purchase of the controller assemblies for these signal projects separately from the construction proiects will enable greater control of quality, better economy and a savings in time. It is estimated that this portion of the protect will cost $52,000.00. Total cost of the signal work is estimated at $310,000.00, of which $210,000.00 would be from Gas Tax and $160,000.00 from Systems fees. The remainder of the project is expected to be brought to the Council for approval to advertise on April 2, 1986. RECOMMENDATION It is recommend -,d that approval be given for obtaining of bids for five signal controller assemblies and a spare controller unit. Estimated cost, $52,000.00. ResDesu itted, PAR:jaa /0/ CITY OF RANCHO Ci1CAAIONGA c rote STAFF REPORT 3 �. 0 DATE: March 20, 1986 5 8 � T0: City Council and City Manager L977 FROM: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to Obtain Bids for the Purchase of Traffic Signal Controllers The City's 1985 -86 Capital Improvement Program includes three traffic signals at the following locations: Arrow Route at Hellman Avenue, Vineyard Avenue at Ninth Street and Base Line Road at Beryl Street. These signals are proposed for funding from the S8325 Gas Tax account. The fourth signal located at Haven Avenue and Church Street will be required to provide safe access to a great many new residences in Terra Vista upon the completion of the eastely extenticn of Church Street, the cost of this signal has been covered by Systcm Dcvelop.cnt fees, paid as a result of the building of the Terra Vista Homes. A traffic signal at Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue will serve growth which has occurred on the west side of Haven Avenue, as well • new apartment units east of Haven Avenue. This signal will also serve the traffic from a single family residential developnent which will occur on the north side of Lemon Avenue, east of Haven Avenue. The cost of this traffic signal will be covered by the system fees paid as a result of these new units. Purchase of the controller assemblies for these signal projects separately from the construction proiects will enable greater control of quality, better economy and a savings in time. It is estimated that this portion of the protect will cost $52,000.00. Total cost of the signal work is estimated at $310,000.00, of which $210,000.00 would be from Gas Tax and $160,000.00 from Systems fees. The remainder of the project is expected to be brought to the Council for approval to advertise on April 2, 1986. RECOMMENDATION It is recommend -,d that approval be given for obtaining of bids for five signal controller assemblies and a spare controller unit. Estimated cost, $52,000.00. ResDesu itted, PAR:jaa /0/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lucwxtp� STAFF REPORT z March 20, 1986 1977 TO: City Council FROM: Louren M. Wassermart�,,,,�� -_ City Manager SUBJECT: Personnel Modifications in the Community Development Department As the City Council Is aware, In a developing organization such as Rancho Cucamonga job responsibilities and duties change from time to time. During the past few months, 1 have been monitoring two such positions within the community Development Department. In the Planninq Division the Senior Office Assistant Is supervisior and evaluating five employees and coordinating that clerical support for the Planning Commission. This position merits consideration to be reclassified to Planning Commission Secretary, with a salary range and supervision cuss consistent whh the Office Supervisor position. Secondly, in the Engineering Division, the Senior Office Assistant duties have evolved to entail more technical responsibilities than clerical This position merits consideration to be retitled to Junior Engineering Aide and retain the some salary level as the Senior Office Assistant position. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve personnel modifications for the Community Development Department to be effective March 20, 1986. LMWank 01 V no n A Alnvn nrin A IMXT. A STAFF REPORT `P, __..�'�+ o � 4 1377 I March 20, 1986 TO: City Manager and City Courg;if FROM: Robert A. Nzzo Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Transfer of Residential Refuse Collection Permit in Service Area One to Yukon Disposal Service. Rancho Disposal Service Inc. currently Is the Residential Refuse Collection Permit holder in Service Area One. They are requesting the City Council approve the transfer of their permit to Yukon Disposal, Inc. Yukon Disposal Service would be assuming the liability and all other obligations of Rancho Disposal Service Inc. within this service area. The provision for such a change Is contained in Rancho Cucamonga Wnicipal Code 8.17.260= B. Yukon Disposal Service is presently permitted by the City to operate In Service Area Three and has met ail the necessary criteria Omurance, bonding, equipment inspection, etc.) to retain their permit. Approval of trarwfer of Residential Refuse Collection Permit In Service Area One to Yukon Disposal Service. /03 RUOM DWOLW 0 Box 1100 1iRVICB, lip Fontana. CA M35 B104 Phone (7 4) 9873717 March 3, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. ^. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention Mr Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager Dear Mr Rizzo This will act as our request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga transfer the refuse permit, in area one, from Rancho Disposal Service to Yukon Disposal Co Please lot me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Very .ruly yours, RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC Edward Burr President /d T — -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1906 TO: Mayor and flembers of the City Council FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner BY John R Meyer, Assistant Planrer SUBJECT: RE1.E4.SE OF CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT if r Im Boulevard Development is requesting release of a f250t. certificate of Deposit for the model homes on Lots T d 8 of Tract 9472 (10265 and 10275 Ring Street, respectively) Staff has inspected the residences and determined ;hat the model home improvements have been removed and garages restored RECOMERD%TIOR Staff recoartands .ne release of the certificate of ePOS io-EfFe—amount Of 52500 to Poulevard Develnnmant R�e lSdt['ful Y Sujvf,� ted, B t/� ULLER / , City Planner 106- CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner C<'G.1tp1, l , Y c � a 1971 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -OIA request to amend the Lana Use Map o e enera an from Low Density Residential (2 -4 au /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land located on the south side of Feron Blod. between Archibald and Turner Avenues - APH 209- 055 -02, 03, 6 14. I. BACKGROUND: On February 19, 1986, the City Cuuncil held a Public earlrTng on this item and determined that approval of the proposed Amendment would be appropriate However, at the time the required documentation authorizing the applicant to act on behalf of the property owner was not submitted to the City. Consequently, the City Council held off on approval of the required Resolution pending submittal of such authorization by the applicant. On March 10, 1986, we received the appropria.e materials along with a letter from our City Attorney stating the authorization is in order No additional information is needrd prior to final action on this Application. of the attached Resolution and the aration is rvconmended. urao uuner City Planner BB:OK:das Attachments: Letter from City Attorrey Authorization February 19, 1986 Council Report Resolution Of Approval /0 7 °f xuY8LR0w(CmCCt"t9.O t[• •ouw.N noow J. YC9 t Y.RR YIM I O 9011 .O D9 .NO C. V .RCSfN(xl •.LI.. O ..1N DON 9RL1 Gt110RY�. 91D1! -�OD9 O C..�O IOl INM (f0 O \O� 4 [n OxL Y..fx. Jo enu[w uol [n as.. March 6, 1986 Otto Rroutil Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Hawkins General Plan .Amendment Dear Ottof Enclosed please find an original of the letter I requested verifying the fact that the proper party has applied for the above- refereiced yeneral plan amendment. The letter is in order so long as the property description stated in the letter matches the property to which the general plan amendment would apply. Assuming that the correct property is described, the matter ought to be placed back on the Council consent calendar for the next meeting for final approval. JLM:ajk Encl. Please call if you have any questions. Ver�yl truly yours, �� James L. Markman City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga —RECEIVED — MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PUMNN/O OIV1410M AM MAR 10 1986 ?t8i9�tl�Ilip�li2�3i4i5�8 /0 00 UW OFFICES SANGER. GRAYSON GIVNER 8 BOOKE ..!]T .\ rR]rol a.\a a, "WIC nl.LU "K, TD sum a w} M . I"' q.... U.0 V V! 600 }W WUT.. PAKRILl DAM !\. .\() (nl�.rl! \•. .�i b-.66) Encino MLV ]n!•VG] G I /OIIV.n Wi rl'InyV.•I] •6b. 14 V.0 it L[n W\[ 'MI ]}O))}I WF nl! .W gat Unaa •nb. )b bJ] D4600 -000 March 4, 1986 Janes Markman, Esq. Duplicate via Messenger City Attorney Post Office BOX 1059 Brea, California 92622 -1059 Re: Deukmejian Family Trust Dear Hr. Markman: This letter will confirm that in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Deukmejian Family Trust dated March 22, 1979 (the "Trust "), Jean Deukmejian is presently solo trustee of the Trust with full power and authority to execute any and all documents in connection with the sale, mortgage, rezoning or development of the Trust Estate or any part thereof, including, without limitation, the processing of a general plan change for the real property legally described as rota 1, 2 and 3 of Tract 5955, Reversion to Acreage, as per plat recorded in Book 74 of Maps, page 20, Records of the County of San Bernardino, state of California. Should you have any further questions with respect to the foregoing, please address them to the undersigned at the above - referenced office. ery kL ICHAEL . Sanger, Grayson, Givner S BuoYa HMS /blm cc: Jean Deukmejian Pam Morales John Hawkins /O RFcEIVEUNRR 5 ,pqS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAATONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Febru -ry 19, x986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner rscAAJn"%- r � s A Z U i 1977 I SUBJEC': ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -01A A request to amend the Lan Use Map o the 5eneral ilai from Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 13 55 acres of land located on the south side of Feron Boulevard between Archibald and Turner Avenues - APN 209 - 055 -02, 33, 14. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant requested a General Plan Amendment from Residential ue �y(4 8 du/ac) for a213.55uacre site locateddinTtheallorth Town neighborhood of Rancho Cucamonga. A previous General Plan application for this site which requested an increase in density to Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) was denied by the City Council in Decenber 1985 The attached "larning Commission repert provides more detailed information relative to this item. II. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The major issues considered by the inn ng Commission at t e January 22. 1986 hearing were land use compatibility and consistency with the goals and policies of the General Plan The Planning Commission determined that the change to Low Medium Density would not create significant land use incompatibility with existing single family development surrounding the site. Issues renarding compatibility of housing type in the 4 -8 du /ac range with the predominantly single family detached homes in the neighborhood could be resolved through design and si.e plan review at the project level. Additionally, the location of the Low Medium Density project within a Low Density area was determined to be consistent with the goals and diversoiltyiwithouthchangingl hiensin gle n familyincharacter ofu•the surrounding residential neighborhood. Thus, the proposed change appears to be consistent with the General Plan if the single family character Of the neighborhood is preserved by use of a compatible project type. //U CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA86 -OIA - HAWKINS February 19, 1986 Page 2 iII. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Lenera an endment and issuance of a Negative Declaration. if the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval would be appropriate. Should the Council not concur, a Resolution of Denial 1s also attached. It should also be noted that the City Attorney advised staff and the applicant that prior to Council approval, additional documentation would be required indicating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of property owner. As of this writing, this documentation has not been received. Unless satisfactory documentation is received prior to the hearing, this item should be continued. Re ectfully bmi , Brad Buller City Planner BB LW:ko Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report, January 22, 1986 Minutes of January 22, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 22, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM, Brad Buller, City Planner BY Lisa Hlninger, Assistant Planner LC(A 5Ip1C < r al y mil. 7 1977 SUBJECT: ENYIROI.•MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -01A wK N - request to amend the and Use Map ie era O an from Low Density Residential (2-4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, east of Archibald - APN 209 - 055 -02, 03, 14. ABSTRACT: A General Plan Amendment is requested from Low Density ei_sfdentTal to Low Medium Density Residential for a 13.55 acre site located in the North Town neighborhood of Rancho Cucamonga (see Exhibit W). The applicant previously requested General Plan Amendments to Medium -High Density Residential and to Medium Density Residential, which were denied by the Planning Commission and City Council after review of the Environmental Impact Report and discussion regarding land use compatibility issues At this meeting, the Commission will receive public input and consider the General Plan Amendment to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac). It BACKGROUND: The protect applicant, John Hawkins, has requested a _6e_n_e_ra7Wan Amendment from Low Density Residential (24 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) In 1984, the applicant submitted a request for General Plan Amendment 84 -03A from Low to Medium High Density Residential. After preparation of an EIR as required by the Commission, it was determined that the approval of the application would create significant environmental impacts which could not be mitigated. In addition, significant land use compatibility problems were noted. The imendment aas denied by the Commission, appealed to the Council, and in June 1985, denied by the Council. In September, 1985, the applicant submitted an application for General Plan Amendment 85 -040 fx a change to Medium Density Residential. The application was denied by the City Council in December 1985 on the qrounds that the land use change was inconsistent with the policies of the General Plan relating to the land use compatibility and transition of density. The applicant has now resubmitted at a lower density range. j / a- ITEM N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendment 86-OIA January 22, 1986 Page 2 III. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested. Enviror +.ntal Assessment per the attached Initial toy and consideration of the General Plan Amendment. B. Location: South side of Feron Boulevard, between Archibald and urnT er�. C. Parcel Size: 13.55 acres. 0. Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential. E. Existing Land Use: Vacant. F. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Rancho Cucamonga M4ddle School, designated Low Density Residential (24 du /ac). South - AT b SF Railroad right of way and winery, designated Industrial Specific Plan. East - Single family homes, designated Low Density Residential `2-4 du /ac). West - Single family homes, designated Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac). G. General Plan Designations: North - Low Density Residential. South - General industrial (Industrial Specific Plan). East - Low Density Residential. Nest - Low Density Residential. If. Site Characteristics: The site lies at the terminus of a drainage channeT wFtF a small drainage course traversing the renter of the site to a north -south direction. A large portion of the site lies within the 100 year flood plain and is subject to periodic floiding. Vegetation consists of a row of Eucalyptus trees along Feron, scattered trees, shrubs and grasses. Feron Blvd. provides direct access to the site, with Main Street dead - ending into the site on the east and west property boundaries. IY. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The final EIR for General Plan en ment scusses potential environmental impacts for four alternative land uses for the site; Low, Low Medium, Medium and Mixed use. The discussion of Low Medium Density stated that this alternative represented no significant impacts. Based on the //3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendment 86-OIA January 22, 1986 Page 3 conclusion of the attached Initial Study and the EIR, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 86 -01A. V. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: The major issues to be considered regard ng thT7P (cation are land uce compatibility of the proposed density with •misting development and consistency with the goals and policies of the General Plan. In the Low Medium Density range of 4 -8 du /ac, development could theoretically occur with housing types in a single family, zero lot line, duplex, or low rise townhouse -type pattern. Since the surrounding area is developed with oldtr, single family detached homes with densities up to approximately 6 units per acre, development in this range could be compatible with existing development. Development at the higher end of the 4 -8 unit range could create some incompatibility with surrounding development. However, this concern can be addressed through appropriate design and site planning at the project level to assure compatibility and proper transition. The General Plan states that Low Medium Density is "characterized by residential densities somewhat greater than the Low Density Residential group." it sta,.es that Law Medium Density would be appropriate within low density areas to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. Therefore, it arpears that development of the site at a Low Medium Density is not Inconsistent with the goals of the General Plan, provided that the single family nature of the area is preserved by use of a compatible project type VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of tie enerai-7Tan Amendment, determine that the change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential would promote the land use goals of the General Plan, and that tTi s— mendment would not be materially injurious to the adjacent properties, the oTilwing findings are necessa-y on approval: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, and; B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element, and; C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious to the adjacent properties. PLANNING CO.kMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendment 86 -01A January 22, 1986 Page 4 VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e 0 a e ort and notices were sent to all property owners wit in feet of the boundary of the proposed property, in addition to other interested area residents. A 4 foot by 8 foot supplemental notification sign has also been erected on -sit^. VIII RECOMMENDATION: Should the Commission determine that the required acts or n ings can be met, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Should the Commission determine that the Facts for Findings cannot be met, a Resolution of Denial is also attached. Respectfully submitted, 6� &OL� Brad Buller City Flanner 88:LI1:f:o Attachments: Exhibit °A• - Vicinity Map Initial Study Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial //J MEDIUM L J , ,$OHOOL SITE ; i�; �I I - �i - �--y— - i i I •� a��l,ww1�w lw.w Ij— ow I •. �.i......�:::::::::•:. l � - :l.'••Al•:�wV•wV"I.:•:'� •'••A \::11::••x: {:•1ti :• }:,.••'•Y�I�� N l T i G. � fir. I • I I .. ' :+ :.�•: °GENERAL WDUSTRI KC_- 1 n • Y. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS NOM CITY OF rrm, 6M ?(a -o/ RANCH0 CUCAMONGA Tom, lh w/41 1rty PLANNING DIVOON r-umm ° SCALE, DRAFT EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION MII!VTES - JANUARY 22, 1986 N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GUERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -OIA - HAWKINS - A ential (2 -4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) acres of land located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, east bald - APH 209- 055 -02, 03, 14 Brad Buller, City Planner, reviewed the staff rr-ort. Commissioner Barker asked if the project was a market rate project, could the developer come in with a request for a bonus thereby increasing the density. Mr. Buller replied that a 25% density bonus could be possible which would increase the number of units from 8 to 10. He additionally advised that this would be an issue addressed by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, if requested by the applicant. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Tracy Tibballs, 10522 Wilson, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Tlbballs acknowledged that the 25% density bonus issue for affordable housing if requested would be addressed by the planning Commission and City Council at a later date. He requested approval of the General Plan kmendment from Low Density to Low Medium Density. Nacho Gracia, 10364 Ilumboldt, Rancho Cucamonga, supported the amendment and stated that he was happy to finally see the density reduced to an appropriate level Commissioner Barker asked if Mr. Gracia understood that the density could come In at 10 witn a density bonus for affordable housing Fir. Gracia replied that he would like to see what that would mean on a site plan, since he was not sure how that would affect the number of dwellings constructed. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner McNlel stated that this was the density which was established as the one most suited for this parcel and was glad to see it finally reduced to that level. Commissioner Chitiea stated that 4 -8 is acceptable and could be compatible; however, was concerned with compatibil4ty shoild the density increase to 10 under a density bonus. Commissioner Rempel was concerned with the development of condominiums or apartments in this area of the City. He stated that this type of product is inherently incompatible with the area due to surrounding uses such as the school on one side and the railroad on the other; therefore, could not support the dmendnent He suggested that the project be developed under the terms of a Dp:eiopment Agreement. 11-2 Commissioner Barker agreed that a -8 units per acre is an appropriate density for this parcel; however was concerned vith development at 10 units ner acre under a density bonus. Chairman Stout stated that he had not changed his opinion that 4 -8 units per acre 1s an appropriate density for the parcel. He inoicated to the developer that when the Commission expresses strong concerns regarding compatibility at higher than 8 units per acre this issue will come up in the design phases, therefore strongly urged the applicant to consider this concern in their building program. Commissioner Chitiea asked if there was a way to tie a development agreement to the land use imerduent. Mr. Markman replied that a development agreement �places zoning not the General Plan designation; therefore, could not be applied to the land use amendment. Mr. Markman indicated that before this project goo, before the City Council documentation would be necessary to indicate that the people signing the application are authorized to control V. land use on the property. Me advised that if this documentation is not received, It would be n- cessary for the City Council to continue consideration of this item until it is received. Motion: Moved by HcNiel, seconded by Stout, carried to recomnerd issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Resolucicn approving Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 86 -ulA, Harkins, to the City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUT, BARKER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, RENPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. - carried A A A A A J/8 IRESOLUTION NO. rJM-SBR ?p - Y / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL FLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86 -OIA - HAWKINS REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAID ' USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCWNGA GENERAL PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2 -4 DU /AC) TO LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC) FOR 13.55 ACRES OF LAID LOCATED ON FERON BOULEVARD EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APR 209- 055-02, 03, 8 14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on January 22, 1986 to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86 -0IA; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments r- the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 8E -0IA; SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council can make the following findings: — — A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent prooerties SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Us Map shall be amended as follows: APN 209- 055 -02, 03 and 14 shall be changed from Low Denisty Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac). SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby ac)pted based upon the completion a�FTEdThgs of the Initial Study NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No 86 -0IA. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1586 AYES: NOES. ABSENT e trey ng, yor 119 CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONOA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Approval of Execution of Contract Documents for Turner Avenue Improvement Project to low bidder, Vance Corporation On March 5, 1986, City Council approved the recommendation that the subject project be awarded to the lowest, responsible bidder, Vance Corporation. Staff is now submitting the contract documents for execution. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve for execution by the Mayor and City Clerk, the contrac: lxuments for Turner Avenue Improvement Project. Attachments 1 /.;)C) AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the following agreement is made and entered into. In triplic te, as of the date executed by the City Clerk and the Mayor, by and between 11LLH.c��n��✓ hereinafter referred to as the "C N - and t ty o ancho Cucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as 'CITY." WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bidr or Proposals, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date ; pecified in said notice; and kiIEREAS. City did accept the bid of Contractor ; and WHEREAS, City has authorized the City Clerk and Mayor to enter into a written contract with Contractor for furnishing labor, equipment, and material for the construction of TURNER AVENUE AND FERON BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furn sh all necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment for and do the work for the IMPROVEMENT OF TURNER AVENUE. Said work to be performed in accordance with soecificatinnc and standards on file in the ufFice of the City Engineer and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the Instruction of the City Engineer. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSICERED COMPLEMENTARY: The aforesaid specifI cat I ons are ncorporate herein by re erence c ereto and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if all of said documents were set forth in full herein Said documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together wits this written agreement, shall constitute the contract between the parties. This contract Is intended to require a completo and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and In accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the Contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the profisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT. A. The undersigned bidder agrees to execute the contract within ten (10) working days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after the 10 working days, and to complete his portion of the work within Forty Five (45) working days from the date specified in the Notice to F -I /Q / Proceed. The bidder agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY ($250.00) DOLLARS dollars for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated I damages. 4. INSURANCE The Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until he has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract until all insurance required of the I subcontractor has been obtained. The Contractor shall take out and maintain at all timcs during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance: a. Cacpensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a certificate of Insurance as proof I that he has taken out full compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor, prior to iomwncing work, shall sign and file with the City a eerti'ieativn as follo,.s: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of She Labor Code which require every employer to be Insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Lode, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.' I b. For all operation of the Contractor or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herei., insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: (1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) L $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident (2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. (3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury L SS00,000 each person; 51,000,000 each accident. (4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each acciden'; $500,000 aggregate. F -2 l (5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; 51,000,000 each accident. (6) Automobile - Property Oamage S250,000 each accident. c. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall: (1) Be issued by an Insurance company approved in writing by City, which is qualified to do 9usiness in the State of California. (2) Name as additional insured the City of Rancho Cucamonga. its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be so Included; (3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or awned by the designated additional insureds shall be called upon to cover a loss under said policy; (4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: 'It 'is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after, receipt by City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage is evidenced by receipt of , registered let er." (5) Othorwico ho in fnrm tatiafartory to City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: (1) Waives all right of su'_rogation against all persons and entities specified to subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be 1'sted as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provide! for '.n paragraph b. by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of Contractor or any subcontractor In performing the work provided for herein; (2) Provides it shalt not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days' written notice thereof given to City by registered mail e. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the :ontract present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or present a certificate of the Insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insureds and other provisions required herein. F -3 /,:;�3 S. MINIMUM AND PREVAILING WAGE. Minimum wage rates for this project, as predeterm ned y the ecretary of Labor, are set forth in the General Conditions. If there is a difference between these predetermined minimum wage rates and the prevailing wage rates determinied by the State for similar classifications of labor, the Contractor and his Subcontractors shall pay not less than the higher wage rate. Pursuant of wages have been iodetermined t and ah�eserdarethli listed din pthe iCalifornia Department of Transporation publication General Prevailing Wage Rates, effectiveon the date of this notice. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to City, twenty -five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid les; than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by hira or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOtNENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section o t e aDOr o e as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices mcy he the work. employed in the prosecution of Attention to directed to the previsions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the Pmployment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777 $ , 35 &sndcd. require: tea Contractor or Mcontractor eMP70yirg tradesmen in any apprentfceable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project an., which administers the apprenticeshin program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The cerriffcate wil, also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that dill be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to jou:neynen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: a. When unemployment in the Area of coverage by the joir- apprenticeship committee has c <ceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or b. Shen the nu.,�,er of apprentices it training in the area exceeds a ratio cf one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is repi+.cing at least 1/30 of its meebership through apprenticeship training on en annual basis statewide or local y, or F -4 /D L/ d. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices o� all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than nne apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contriautians to funds estabiisheJ for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The requirements tofcSections 1777 5 and 1777.6 in the employment of prentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obta4ned from the Director of Indurtrial Relations, ex- officio the administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WOQK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal days woe or a > workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall Comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set fe -th in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty -five dollars (S25 00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in thr execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereirbefore m- ntioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman ne ^dad to execute the work required by this contract cs such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements .filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. 9. CONTRACTORS LIABILITY: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and its elected officials, o cers, agents and employees shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work, or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen, employees of the Contractor or his subcontractors or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of 0 in connection with the performence of the work. The Contractor shall be resposible for any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or fray any cause whatsoever, except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its "Ployees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City -u- !.-,g the progress of the work or at any time before its completion and final acceptance. F -5 t. The Contractor will indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees against anJ will hold and save them harmless from any and ail actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities :hat may be asserted or claimed oy any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or In Connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor, his agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City, its olected officials, officers, agents and employees, but excludirg such actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalities, obligations, or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, and to connection therewith: a The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations, or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. b. The Contractor will promptly pay any Judgment rendered against the Contractor of City, or Its elected officials, officers, agents or employees, covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, and the Contractor agrees to save and hold the same harmless therefrom, C In the event City, withcat fault, is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against thr Contractor for damages or other claims arising out or or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, the Contractor agrees to pay to city any and all costs and expenses incurred by City in such action or pr0u2edirg Logether with reasonable attorneys' fees. So such of the money due to the Contractor under and by virture of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be rotained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damage as aforesaid. in. NON- D:SCRIMINATION: No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon pup c works because of the race, color, or religion of such persons, and every contractor for public works violating this •. ection is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 rf the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 1735 of said code. 11. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the Contractor for a furnishing the mater an n ng the prescribed work the unit prices set forth in accordance with Contractor's Proposal dated February 21, 1986. F -6 /,=) kb 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES: In the event that any action or proceeding is brought e t er y par to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the Prevailing party shall recover its reasonable atto -neys' fees and costs incurred with respect thereto. IN WITNESS duly ex cut d witthEall thehforrmalities requiredvbyc law eon the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California Contractor's License No.. %tPl,5(r7 —/�_ ao ate BY:. (� Title to CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA BY: Mayor BY: ----TT—Cy erk Date Contractor's Business Phone Emergency Phone at which Contractor can be reached at any time F -7 /C)-,? PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUM AMOUNTS IMPROVEMENT OF TURNER AVENUE AND FERON BOULEVARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA: The undersigned bidder declares that he has carefully examined the location of the p- oposed work, that he has examined the plans, special provisions and specifications, and read the accompanying instruction to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with the Plans, Special Provisions and Specifications, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost and lump sum amounts set forth in the schedule on the following Proposal. Item Estimated Description Unit Price Total No. Quantity (Unit Price in Words) (In Figures) (In Figures) 1 L. S. Clearing and Grubbing at a lump sum price of Twenty -three thousand nine hundred dollars and aa—centn S L.S. S 23.900.00 / 2 1350 C. Y. Unclassified Excavation L Fill at Seven dollarn and fifty ent S 7.50 S 10.125.00 per cubic yard 3 735 L. F. Be P.C.C. curb and 24• gutter per plan at \ire dollars and no cents $ 9.00 S 6.615.00 per near foot C -1 PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUN AMOUNTS IMPROVEMENT OF TURNER AVENUE AND FERON BOULEVARD 4 5600 S. F. P.C.C. sidewalk and access rasps at One dollar and sixty -five cents S 1.65 S 9.260.00 ✓ Per square oot - 5 1155 S. F. 6" P.C.C. Driveway Approach at Two dollars and ss =vents -five cents S 2.75 - S J.I)6.25 per square foot 6 1820 S. F. P.L.C. Cross - Gutter and Spandrel at Three dollars and flfry cents S 3.50 S 6,370.00 per square toot 7 6 C. Y. P.L.C. Retaining Curb at Five hundred fifty d here And,110 Cents S 550.00 S a, t(N1.00 ✓ Per cubic yard d 520 S. F. P.C.C. Driveway and Sidewalk Transition at Jt+o dollars and no nt S 2.00 S 1,060.00 Per square sot 9 785 L.F. Slumpstone Block Mall at Twelve doll +r. and no cents S 1).no S o.6 n on Per near oat VANCF CORPORATION etdder C -2 ID-2 .PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUM AMOUNTS IMPROVEMENT OF TURNER AVENUE AND FERON BOULEVARD 10 2 C. Y. P.C.C. Stairway with Handrail at Five hundr fifty dollara and no tan a S 550.00 S t.tnn.nn per CUD IC yard 11 970 Tons 3' & 4' Thick Asphalt Concrete Pavement at 'Twenty -nine dollars and forty cents S 29.40 S 7p.s ?p n0 / per ton - 12 850 S. F. ' Thick & Variable Thick- ness Asphalt Concrete at Three dollars and twenty -iive Bents S 3.25 S 7.7R 7. 50 ar per sque odt 13 1000 Tons Crushed Aggregate Base at Seventeen dollars and no Bence S t7.00 S t7.nnn '� per ton nn 14 1 Each Adjust Manholes to Grade at Four hundred dollars and no tentn S 40n.00 S 4nn nn each 15 1 Each AdJust Water Valve Covers to Grade at 7tro hundred dolinr� n d 0o eenta S onn nn C 700.ff. Each VANCE CORPORATION der C -3 13 6 PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LLW SUN AMOUNTS IMPROVEMENT OF TURNER AVENUE AND MON BOULEVARD 16 1 Each Catch Basin No 3, H•14' Including Local Depression Five thousand five h and ad i � Collars a d noeemr.� eech S 5.500.00 E e_tn0.00 17 125 L.F. 21 Inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe with Concrete Bedding Fifty dollars and no crate S 50.00 S 6,250.00 / Per near foot 18 100 L.F. 8' A.C. Berm at Eight dollars and no cents S 8.00 S A0o.00 per linear foot 19 L. S. Chain Lint Fence and Gates h i Two thousand dollars and .a2 cenL9 E 2,0Q 5 �.nnn.nn per lump sum 20 L. S. Traffic Striping and Signing at t ho thousand fly hnrdr d dallnrs., �cd nos;n— S L.S. S �.snn nn Per ump :um 21 650 L.F. Trench Excavation and ! B•ckfill for Street Lighting (cable -in- conduit) ( Three dollar. And fifty. 5 1_tn � Der near foot 4 p VANCE CORPORATION er C -4 131 PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUM AMOUNTS IMPROVEMENTS TO TURNER AVENUE AND FERO?1 BLVD. 22. 355 L.F. Construct 4' DIP Sewer Laterals with Wye Connections & Stubouts at Tventy -eta dollnre d no Centf — S per Henar 26.00 $ 9.270.00 Toot 23. 453 L.F. Construct 4e ABS Sewer Laterals and Connections at M e nty doll nd nn _901. $ 20.00 S 9,050.00 per ncar oot 24. 6 Each Install Backwater Valve Including enclosing cylinder /box at FiCcv d911e re_�nd n�rsnto ac S 50.00 S n00.00 25. 12 Each Install Clean -outs at Hand no cents $�§ 00 $ 1.980.00 Each 26. 6 Each Abandonment of Existing Private Sewage Disposdl Facilities at Seven hundred tvenry -five Loll r+ and n,, cents $ 725.00 S 4,750.00 ac 27 220 L.F. Construct 8" 0.1 P. Sewer Trunk Complete, including but not lim4ted to pipe, fittings, stubs, water- tight plugs, excavation, backfill and testing at nt,en[v -PVO dnil d e rcat� 22.00 4,840.00 Per 1 n1 ear loot C -5 /,3,)- 28 1 Each Construct Standard Manhole complete, ircliding frame and cover ac the price of Six hundred fifty dollars and nu cents 650.60 650.00 ac 29. 1 Each Break into and Rechannel Floor of Existing Mahole (STA 5 +72N, STA 040014) in Turner Avenue at the price of Seven hundred seventy -five dollars and no vent• .75.00 _ 775.00 Fach TOTAL SON OF 810 Or, hundred a vent - hree ,and, six Wards hundred seventy -six dellnrs and etynnty -five �S j}, 67 7 ( gures C -6 133 PROPOSAL BIDDER AGREEMENT The undersigned also agrees as follows: FIRST: Within 15 ralendar days fram the receipt of the Nnti,:e of Award of Contract, to execute th- contract, and to furnish to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Two (2) satisfactory bonds in the amounts specified in the Notice Inviting Bids guaranteeing the faithful performance of the vork and payment of bills. SECOND: To begin work within 10 calendar days after the date specified in the Notice to Proceed and to prosecute said work in such a manner IS to complete it within Forty Five (45) working days after such specified date. Accompanying this proposal 1s cash, a cashier's check, or a certified check Of a bidders bond for not less than ten pertant of the total amount of the bid payaole to the City which is to be forfeited, as liguidnted damages. if, in the event the contractor does not execute the contract and furnish satisfactory bonds under the conditions end within the tine specified in this proposal, otheraise said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond is to be returned to the undersigned. Within 13 calendar days after award of the contract the City will return the bidders bond accompanying such proposal not considered in making the award. All other bidders bonds will be held until the contrast has been finally executed. They will then be returned to the respective bidders whose proposals they accompany. BIDDER: Vance Corporation 3940 P110to Street co^pnrat on, state eg%i name Of corporation and names of the president, secretary, treasurer, and manager; copartnership, state true name of firm and names of all Individual copartners composing firm; or an individual, state first and last names in full Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registration of Contractors, License N��o++. �q c 7 SIGN HERE U(/tt�tt.� i Fres. Sew c /T� rrns 2 21 86 cer ate cer — —7 T— a —t— cer —Tft ,— — ae Signature and title of the Officer(s) set forth above shall be authorized to sign contracts on behalf of the corporation, copartnership or individual. If signature is by an agent, other than an officer of the corporation or a member of a partnership, a Power of Attorney must be on file with the City Prior to or at time of bid opening; otherwise the bid will be subject to rejection by City Counsel. D -1 13V PROPOSAL BIDDER INFORMATION The bidder shall firnisn the following information Additional sheets may be attached if necessary: NAME OF FIRM: VANCE- 0011PORATIOh Type of Ftm: CorporationX _ Individual_ Partnership Business Address:0940 Pvrite Street Riverside, CA 92309 Place of Business Same as above Place of Residence 1342 NO Quince Upland CA 91785 Telephone: (714) 685 -0845 Contractor's license: State: CA License No. 414567 A Names and titles of all members of the fim Jo Ann Vance Pres. Sec /Trees. Gene Vance Vice- President _ Don Swenson Estimator Number of years as a contractor in construction work of this type: 4 Three projects of this type recently completed: Contract Amcunt Type of Project Date Completed Owner's N. ie & Addrs $511. b00.00 Grodim, d Paving 1/20/86 U.S. 0.st of h`ry 29. Palms K S138.548.00 Gradtm & Paying 10/31/86 US. Dot of tie Interior BeL2 i nf TrAim off i srr $325.000.00 Paving 4/16/95 Son Bntmilim Cty Dept Of lk - _ 825 F. 3wini cr -..CT Person who Inspected site of the proposed work for your firm: Name: GeOe va +Lr `: A non cwPOShcate of Inspect-r- 4. 1/17/86 NOTE: If requested by City, the Bidder shall furnish a notarized financial statement, references, and other information, sufficiently comprehensive to permit an appraisa, of his cur•ent financial condition. E - 1 1 -1 ?J PROPOSAL SUBCONTRACTORS In compliance with the provisions of the Government Code Section 4102, the undersigned bidder herewith sets forth the name and location of the place of business of each sub- contractor who will perform wort or labor or rende- service to the general contractor in or about the construction of the work or Improvement in an amount in excess of one -half of one ,7ercent (1 /2%) of the general contractor's total bid, and the portion of the work which will be done by each sub -font -actor as follows: Place Of Business Description of Subcontractor's Name (Address & Phone) Work Alert Barricade, Inc 25554 6th S[ Hemet CA 1'affic Control Mancha Corporation 8621 Juniper Ave Fontana, CA Stotm Plain �SeStic Tank A. S. Peach Inc _ 11114 Pipeline Pomona CA Seuvr E -2 /3C PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION OF NON- OTSCRIMINATION BY CONTRACTORS As suppliers of goads or services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the firm listed below certifies that it does not discriminate in its employment with regard to age /handicap, race, color, religion, sex or national origin, that it Is in compliance with all federal, state and local directives and executive orders regarding nor- discrimination in employment; and that it agrees to demonstrate positively and aggressively the principle of equal opportunity in employment. We agree specifically: 1. To establish or observo employment policies which affirmatively promote opportunities for minority persons at all job levels. 2. To communicate this policy to all persons concerned, including all company employees, outsi;e recru ting services, especially those serving minority communities, and to the minority communities at large. 3. To take aftirmative steps to hire minority employees within the firm. FIRM VANCF. CORPOR ITION TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING Prpstdpnr _ SIGNATURE �nci-A. -- I n aP n Please include any ad.icional -ormation available regarding equal opportunity employment progrwns now in effect within your firm. See Attached E -3 132 PROPOSAL NON- COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (This affidavit shall be executed by all bidders at the time of bid opening Failure to complete the form may constitute the bidder being ,judged non responsive and having his bid reiected ) To the City of Rancho Cucamonga: The undersigned bidder is submitting a bid for performing the following work by contract, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That the undersigned bidder has mt, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in any - ollusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive biuding in connection with such contract. IMPROVEMENT OF TURNER AVENUE AND FERON BOULEVARD Work STATE OF CALIFORNIA �I COUNTY OF �iYif Gcllss i JJJ I I F I'IAL S[AL C R L SCAOV BM • CAWORNIA lsI. L COLM ".• rUt l0. 199 -M {Lf- hOMI�, PIIU -Iti nIl VANCI� CORPORATION B� N _ 0 R 1 Ann Vance by IJ Title _ Individual, _ Partnership A Corporation Other, explain �j rl On tae lay W Oefde me the undpsi a Noury vudc n And (a m Ina inu t9 AS -- - u 'C to perspwry sppeare0 IOr WWe0 10 me On the U" 0: >ahefddprT "Mmee to t: INI per fts who "am W me MINI% Nnrunwnl ai aaa3 wlxl Uenlled tk respedNey of the cam,hOn MGM named and uaN,H 5«nary. laKWCO d pursuant IO Iis OY'A" WOr a resdulOn of a1 burrd ofl&attttsthat OMitipt iYITNESS plr nW aN ollc sa' u \ NetuY PoWC m am IOr sad Slate /38 .i .1 �I G�Uilpl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �G'YjW1/t A CMWY�'w. 1071 Cherie. J.0K.tII Jeffrey Ring Rkhard31 D.W pwd. J. Wrikht ADDENDUM NO. 1 Turner Avenue Improvements Street Improvements The bidder's attention Is directed to Page H -12, 'Certificate" of the Contract Specifications which addresses the performance of previous contracts or subcontracts subject to the equal opportunity clause and the filing of the required reports. All bidders shall submit said certificate which shall '.Irm part of the bid proposal to be submitted by 2:00 P.M. on February 21, 1986, at th, City Clark's office, City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acknowledgment of this Addendum No. 1 shall be noted by the bidders signature below and shall be included in the bid package. JC1.z Ld� �h Bidder gnat Oate /13 / 1]70eA5EL XEROAO.SUITLC . POSTOFFICE1101807. RA \C[IOCCCA310%*GA.C.LLIFOKSIA11770 • 1110999.193t BOND NO. B53 OS 03 PREMIUMr$2,!o1. PXECOIED IN TRIPLICATE CONTRACT FAIT1F11f =0040 KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS; THAT VANCE CORPORATION _ 3940 Pyrite Street. Rlyerelde r_Ci as principal, and RELIANCE INSURANCE 0' W:Ny • as surety, are held and firmly bcurd unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in the just and full amount Of S ONE RUNDRID SEVENTY TIQiCE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED :EVENV SL'( AND 75/100 �r s yt77.676.75 gores Payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, Jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Given under Our hands and sealed with our seal this 7th day of March Ig 86, The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, WHEREAS, the above -named principal is about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct IMPROVEMENT (r TURNER AVENUE ANO FERON BOULEVARD In accordance with the •� •�••.AGREENENi dated which said contract is hereby referred ` 1. to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein 1 specifically set forth; NOW, T'ZVORE, if the said principal shall well and truly do cod perform all things agreed by the principal to said contract to be done and performed, then this Obligation is to be void; otherwise it will remain in full farce and effect; PROVIDED, that for value received the undersigned stipulate end agree that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or item nr items of performance required er TT z� G -1 CONTRACT rAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligations of the undersigned under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendcent, limitation of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change, extension of t1ma, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature or time of performance required therein or thereunder. WITNESS our hands this 7th day of Nateh 1986. VANCE CORPORATION 1 by Title P✓t.Q-a b Title Individual _ Partnership 70IX Corporation _ Other, explain REI.IA Robert yH. Minot •SICJIATURES OF CONTRACTOR MUST BE jP=NOfLEDGED BEFORE A NOiARTo PUBLIC. Fae PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKKM&EDGEWXr FIAlpl (INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.) G -2 /y/ BOND H0. B53 05 03 EXECurED IN TRIPLICATE C O N T R A C T Rae reeaeam ea:rtea for mu W N is Wea In out eaves o as fefsem"" 1eea.' LABOR A40 MATERIALS BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT VANCE CORPORATION, 3940 Pyrite Streer.RivereldcaSCp99 rincipal, and RELIANCE INSURANCE Coi@ANY , a$ surety, are held and firmly ( bound unto the City of Rancho Cucwonga, a municipal corporation, in the Just and full amount Of ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY THREE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY ($173.676.75) (wards) for the payment whereof we hereby bind ourselvt•s, our heirs, executors, administrators succe3sors and assigns, Jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Give under our hands and sealed with our seals this 7th day of March 19 86, the condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, L WEREAS, the above -named principal is about to enter into a contract with the , City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct IMPROVEMENT OF TURNER AVENUE AND FERON BOULEVARD in accordance with the t AGREEMENT dated 19 as provided in Maid contract, which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereo• to the same extent ( as if the same were harein specifically set forth; L NOW, THEREFORE, if the said rind al or P D principal's subcontractors fail to pay for any materials, provisions, supplies or equipment used in, upon, for or about the performance of said work contracted to be done, or for any work or ` labor thereon of any kind, or for emounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the surety will pay for the same in an Famount not exceed the sum hereinabove specified. and in case suit is brought l G -3 ir^«- CONTRACT LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND hereon, a reasonable at.orney's fee to be fixed by the Court, otherwise this bon., shall be void and of no effect; PROVIDED, that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to said c, ntract, or agreement, or of any feature or item items Gf performance requi'ed therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligation of tl.e undersigned on or under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive nrtice of such amendment, limitation of time for bringing action on this bond 'jy the City, change extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature or Item or, items of Performance required hrrein or thereunder. This bon! shall insure to the benefit of any and all Persons entitled to file claims order Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, and shall give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brou,jht upon this h:ad. NIULSS our hands this 7th day of March , 19 86 . VANCE CORPORATION i E N N L b— Title Individual Partnership xx Corporation Other, explain R7yWaS -19 WCE C Mr \✓ /� �a ert Y. Minot Attorney -in-Fact •SIGNATURES OF COHIRACUR MUST BE ACKHOHLEDG0 BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACP.M W- EOGMtNT FORKS (INDIVIDUAL, PARTFERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.). G -4 /113 ,1 Carloon 1 Nut .asuranm serums P. 0. 9aa 90190 Pasadena, CA 911er0190 Vance Corporation 3949 Pyrtte Street Riverside, CA 925a9 Employers ln-. nce at Vausav Mum 10. 1996 .0 A a - 204- 01-051934 — - — 9/23/99 03/01106 — — x x 1 x Opeattomf lAgOv"tht of Iurmr Annie AIM 4ltrW to film 9oulward Main Street — 195 teat vest of Tura, !venue to Iunit ivvese and I'm loulfvard wet of I"t AMMn. Contract Prim 1173,677. A 201a- 00 -OSI034 03/01/81 11/96 1,000, It — Soecsal c3M1llo,x a rnoect3 General and Autoe26ile t•ab� ility: It is &reed City of lanced Cocymya is Included is in Additloral ],Wooed, WC ward& as ?"pacts work pnfornd aid vehicles used by at on oellf of ttx Mued insltfd M eaneattm with the Maw described progert. It I0 f' -Wr &seed that such iuxaanm as is afforded City of txcho t. CucUM93 0111 be ptimy and mi-contributary, with any other iimaame t fn force far or which cry be purchased by City at rancho Cucism,3I. It is Lraerstoo0 an0 agreed tie CnpaW vain its light of sWrojition agalrot City of Riedw Cueavga Coach M arise by raison of a paysent of clue War W policy. MM v City sf ccto Wcaango .:sa „�.. .,C; •[or v�c•e ^t on—zLa• i Post Office Bax 8C7 " 30 'AFC• :u va CvrA.y .11a xxrci}itrxxx 'S taneha Cueaeonga, California 91730 ,. `II���I[[xxaa��u�[ xx XX�[x` ,aµµR•�-•r -.'yt .•••,ern ve.ie> t Mali � •+•`n.R•.• .. n.. 'n•- O•r>" ° m - _° R"a`>;^.�tu'°�rrre�l'�'i�TI"F'° • 1VU +s.W.P£SU NSV:yu. a.•np'cI1a.V r•. _J-o' -o cLdin lu xC reC r xn0.' .(uracx,-p, ^ NiiMJ•A• l :d EV T•.(=• •• 1 1.,:. •.:VL14T iCf4 0.A .r- At'a'•r• rB(n _ __ _ .r1AR • •Goon. _ J ' A X 2026.00.054031 9/27/85 01:01/96 � X , . x 1,000, 1,000, A —_ x A a - 204- 01-051934 — - — 9/23/99 03/01106 — — x x 1 x Opeattomf lAgOv"tht of Iurmr Annie AIM 4ltrW to film 9oulward Main Street — 195 teat vest of Tura, !venue to Iunit ivvese and I'm loulfvard wet of I"t AMMn. Contract Prim 1173,677. A 201a- 00 -OSI034 03/01/81 11/96 1,000, It — Soecsal c3M1llo,x a rnoect3 General and Autoe26ile t•ab� ility: It is &reed City of lanced Cocymya is Included is in Additloral ],Wooed, WC ward& as ?"pacts work pnfornd aid vehicles used by at on oellf of ttx Mued insltfd M eaneattm with the Maw described progert. It I0 f' -Wr &seed that such iuxaanm as is afforded City of txcho t. CucUM93 0111 be ptimy and mi-contributary, with any other iimaame t fn force far or which cry be purchased by City at rancho Cucism,3I. It is Lraerstoo0 an0 agreed tie CnpaW vain its light of sWrojition agalrot City of Riedw Cueavga Coach M arise by raison of a paysent of clue War W policy. MM v City sf ccto Wcaango .:sa „�.. .,C; •[or v�c•e ^t on—zLa• i Post Office Bax 8C7 " 30 'AFC• :u va CvrA.y .11a xxrci}itrxxx 'S taneha Cueaeonga, California 91730 ,. `II���I[[xxaa��u�[ xx XX�[x` ,aµµR•�-•r -.'yt .•••,ern ve.ie> t Mali � •+•`n.R•.• .. n.. C C C WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE The Contractor shall execute the following fr-a as required by the California Labor Code, Sections I860 and 1861: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be Insured against lirbllity for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordjnce with the previsions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. Gate: WD 6 ontractor (5 ggpture �✓L -e.0 it e At t• gna (Title) G -5 CITY OF RANCH3 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOT DATE: March 13, 1786 C..a� • a TO: City Council and City Manager PRON: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Pulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: APPROVAL OP ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS PROPESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENTS. Annually, the Assessment Distclets must be updated for the current fiscal year This is necessary to prepare the annual assessment spread, and to insure that all assessment records are current and accurate. Therefore, The Alta Lama Channel Asseesment District 84 -2, and the Communit'' Facilities District 84 -1's Professional Service Agreement3 are being provided for your consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the appr ^val of these Professional Service Agreements. "spe ;tf`u�llly Submitted, o e`rX Zzo Asci at City Manager JBP:kmm S6 i 'AA7 W IMAN ASSOCIATES 0 ENGINEERS & PLANNM OI'{� NrywfY V!-RJO .SCY' �d'$e"'aa+oadSp+�ro �k b February 26, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attn: Mr. Jerry Fulwood Subject: Proposal for - Update of Mello -Roos Community Facilities District No. 84 -1, Fiscal Year 1986 -87 Dear Mr. Fulwood: In respond o your request, we are pleated to submit this proposal for special dls.rict services by our firm to conduct proceadings toward the update and w0tetion of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District No. 84 -1 for Day Creek Based on the method of apportionment of the S,2eclal Tax as established in the Engineer's Tax Apportionment Report, our fn. for update and sub- sequent collection of this district will be a lump sum of $10,500. As in the previous cciloction year, the City Is to provide our office with the total tpaeial tax dollar amount to r -. e, *lied for the eollertion year 1966 -87 If your office requires any further Informai:or please di not hesitate to contact us once again, we look forward to working with your City and appreciate your consideration of our firm. JBS: SSN: Jid Respectfully submitted, lv7 290 S. ANAHEN VOLEVAID • SURE 100. ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92805 • (714) 774 -57AO • (2:5) 924.1631 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT I This Agreement Is made and entered into this A O mday of 16d ^ , 19L(. between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and (hereinafter referred to as ' CONSUITANT°). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore issued Its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the ( "Project" hereafter). (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (111) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render aivice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning romnission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NO'A, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreem ^nt otherwise requires: 7/31/85 n (a) Project: The preparation of _II ^ •Y_- -J_ I 1 nn .L- described in Exhibit •A` Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of naps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and dertiments to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by :ITY with refpect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. 'o) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project. (c) Comoletion of Project- The date of completion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, n al presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit •S• P -oject Sehed0t attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees a, follows. (a) CONSULfANT shat' forthwith undertake and complete L "-i project in accordance with Exhibit •A anl applicable with Feda ^al, State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall Supply copies of all malls, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as •docimments•) including all supplemental technical ch)zuments, rs described in Exhibit 'A• to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit -2- Al r a7, " '80. Copies of the docixtents shall be to such numbars as are required by I Exhibit 'A'. CITY may thoroafter review and forward to CONSULTANT cements regarding said do«mts acd CONSULTANT shall thereafter make sue. revitians to said docusants as are deized necessary. CITY shall receive revised doc-=ents in such fora and to the quantities detamined .Acessa:y by CITY. The tine limits set forth pursuant to this S!ction 82.(b) ray be extended ucan a written approval of =. (c) MISULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sale cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons a: ray, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to ccoply with the term of this Agreecent. to the event any such other persons are retained by CO.vSU MIT. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services Orequired hereunder. CONSULTANT further agruer that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTAT except upon the prior Britten approvnl of CITY. 3. CITY aarces is folicu-s: (a) Tn pay CONSULTANT a maxtaxaa sum arkm rpm for the perforaenca of Via Services raqu;red 'erauiider, fits sum shall cover the cost of tt, staff time and all other direct and indiruct costs or fees, including the work of aaployees, consultants and zubcontrtetars to CONSULTANT. Paymnt to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be cads in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C'. (b) PAymants to CONSULTANT shall to aads by CITY to accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, an a monthly basis, and such invoices %halt be paid within a real .ble time aftdr said Invoices arc received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C' either with 5 f ~ retpact to hourly rites or lump Stra amounts for individual tasks. In n0 I� r event, however, wirl said invoices exceed 9S% of individual task totals rescribed in Exhibits "A" and "C ". (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, a: described herein acceptable in fora and content to CITY. Final payment shall :e made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services request:a, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C ". Charges for addifiona' services shall be invoiced on a monthly baits and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. Ctri agrees t� provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit vA" hereto. (b) Photographicaily reproducible copies of maps and other Information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However. it shall be i CONSULTANT's responsibility to mane all initial contact with respect to the (, gathering of such information. -4- 11-5-1 S. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, stuEtes, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of :CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and ` materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTAN7 shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written 'Notice of Termination' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice In the ±vent this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT s amicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit •D', an a pro - rata basis wits respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shal' CONSULTANT receiva more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shad provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, Photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by -5- I CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may no; terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Oestanated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: 1/,,.,._./ Q . 7(--, n ....t 91730• Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eisht (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly t addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under i this Agreement until it has obtalnee all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies i of insurance: (a) Worker's Ca.nsaton Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that It has taken out full workers' compensaton insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of Californ "a. -6- /S.3 In accordance with the provisions) of Californ'a Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall •ign and file with CM a certification as follows: "I ala aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Cade which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I Will comply with such Provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement'. (b) Public Liability and Prooerty Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and rutemobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily it ury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies OF insurance concerning errors and omissions ( "malpractice ") providing z protection of at least j .�e�r�p0 a ",.i r .dY00,O t -cn and omissions ( "malpractice ") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder vn behalf of CITY. (d) Gee'Weral Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only to -7- /S11 responsible insurance companies licegsed to do business to the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributin3 w.th any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copits of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from lass, dvmage or injury to persons or property, Including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and ail legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissinns of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential dama3es, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment): No assignment of this Agreement or of any part cr obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or In part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contracte.-s under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be -8- /S i employees of CITY. i 12. Goveri.inc Law: This Agreement shal' be governed by and construed in accordance witq the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recnver attorreys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agre=ents, either oral or in writing, between the parties w•th respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or premise not contained in this Agreemcnt shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shad be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITICESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT Cate: CITY OF RANCHO CUCfMONGA Date: Jon . e s, ayoT�i � ATTEST: Beverly A. Authere—t.-M—y-MR- Approved as to form: iy Attorney -9- /1R6 M 0177 PRCFESSMIAL SMICES AGREMVT i " This Agretsant is made and entered into this OAT* day n of 744' " 19140 between the City of Rancho Cumnong ►, a FWniclpal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as •CITY•) and %il (hereinafter referred to as •CONSULTAIM). A. Recitals. (1) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal ps. Wiling to the perforrance of professional services with respect to the preparation of (-Project- hereafter). (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (1I1) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to ran0 -- ..mica and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Comission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (Iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perfom such services end Is willing to psrfem such professional services as hereinafter defined. NO'J. TNERUORE, it is agreed by and tatween CITY and CONSULTS.:, as i follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following term, except where the context of this Agreement otharwisa requires: 7/31/05 -1- / S 2 c I to, the preparatir: of caps, surveys, resorts, and documents, the presentation, toth oral and in writing, of such plans, raps, surveys, reports and docents to CITY as rrTii: d end attandarn= at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other seettngs gndw'.ed by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Sarvtcet. (b) Services: Such professional rervices as are necessary to be performed by C8.NSM in order to complete Ure p eject. (c) Co=oletion of Project: Tae di:e of comrletion of all phases of the project, ieciudi% any and all procdu-es, development puns. caps, surveys, plan doacnts, technical reports, eeetings, oral presentations and attendance by CMS&TAYI at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for - ustructicn is set forth in Exhibi• 68' Project Schedule attached hereto. js�. _ Z. CMMLTAXT acres as follows: (a) CMtSMTA'tT shall forthwith uncertake and co:ylete the project in accordance with Exhibi• 'A and applicable with Federal, ::+x and CITY statues, regmla.ions, ordinam es pad gutdelirxs, all to U•e reasonable satisfy -'Ton of CM. (b) MrSMTATi shall sepply copies of all asps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectivrIj re: -+rd to as 'documents') including all supplemental technical doaxments, as discribd in Exhibit 'A' to CM within the Live specified in Project SckeduleO, Exhibit -2- 158 le, a "8•. Copies of the aocuments shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit '-A•. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall the- eafter make such revisions to said documents as are deezed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such form and to the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits se: forth pursuant to this Section P2.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to cwmply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontr.ctor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY tarexs as follows: a.rQy�jy`�ti (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of4l�i°�"f'y".'��/ 4 for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, Y including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractirs to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with , the schedule set forth in Exhibit •C•. ;i (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shalt be made by CITY in ') accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said* invoices are 1s; received by CITY. All charges shall br, detailed in Exhibit "C" either with Y n• retpect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no -3- /S 9 event, how_ver, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Zxhibits "A" and "C ". (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, to no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form ono content to CITY. Final rayment shall be made not later than GO days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments to additional services requested, in writing. by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimburspcent basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C ". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to o -ovide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth to Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in Drier to complete the project. (c) Such information as is ger.erall.t available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in lbtaining lnformaticn from other governmental agencies and /or priva.e parties. However, It s:13i1 be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information -4- 4 E S. Ownershio of Documents: All documents, data, studies, , surveys, drawings: waps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of -CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the C TY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written rn ^.e,t W the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all d=agas. claims and losses incloding defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or re-ise at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6 Termination. Th s a,reement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving -f a written "Notice of Termination' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated. CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT'S applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "d ", on a pro - rata basis with respect to the percentage of the , oject completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CUNSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT $hill provide to i CITY any end ail documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, modJs, ii photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by -/5- CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated_ Ron�tiantatives: Any and all notices, demands, invo'ce, and written communications between the parties herets andil be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7 The below named individuals, furtherare, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: 91730 Any such notices, demands, invnices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have peen received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neit`ar commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractcr to Commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies v of Insurance: (a) Worker's Gmoensaten Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out ful! workers' compensaton insurance for all persons whom it nay criploy directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of -he State of California. -fi- In accordance with the provisions: of California Labor Code Section 3700, every emoloyer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: et am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worke. compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement°. (b) Public Liability and Promerty Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against clams and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT'S activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars (S1,000,000.00) for bodily injury er death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a pottcy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ("malpractice") providing r protection of aj least /ocerrn .aid.�.r,�•.0,1. -osrfA errors l and omissions (•malpractice') with respect to loss arising from actions of �* CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY )- (d) 0e`heral Insurance Remuirements: All insurance required by express provision of Chis Agreement shall be carried only in -7- 1�3 J responsible insurance companies licegsed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as aui'tir•al insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, aid agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer, waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CIIY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are p unary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY, and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (SO) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly uoon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own, account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: COMULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or Willful acts or missions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment): No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or abligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or In part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11 Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors •nder th,s Agreement and shall not be csnstrued for any purpose to be /iP7 employees of CITY. i 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance witq the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between Lire parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no ..rresentation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other a7, I V , statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be va It sne ` nding, Any modification of this Agreement sha „ be effective only it t is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement s of the day and year first set forth above: cOhSULTANT Date: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: iycr ATTEST: Beverly A. e et.- M— CTer:r Approved as to form: ma `tn y c.orney -9- /t° S ORDINANCE 10. 289 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANGED CUCLKOBGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS OPUS CERTAIN GIFT STREETS A. Recitals. (1) California Vehicle Code Section 22358 provides that this City Council nay, by ordinance, see prima facie speed limits upon any portion of aey street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic ■arvey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets are specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B. balm, are based open the enginearing and traffic survey Identified in Section A (ii). above. B. Ordi ... ce NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUSCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOGS MEET ORDAIN AS POLLOUSt •. nfii'ii7� Section 10.20.020 hereby in amended to the Rancho Cucamoaga City Code to read. in words and figures, as follwet 10.20.020 Deereue of state lm YZiWam soe.d. it is daterained by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an aagineeriug and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state I" if greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to "Let upon such streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be •s eat forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice bereoft Declared Prima Facie Isar of Street or Portion Aff.egd Speed Limit (MPH) 1. Archibald Aveooe— Foortb Street to 45 Banyan Street 2. Arrow Route —Baker to Haven 45 3. Haven Avenue Highland to Wilson 50 4. Hallman Avenue— Footbill to Alta Loss Drive 35 5. Hellman Avenue --6ch to Foothill 45 6. Hellman Avenue -500' north of Maasanits to 40 Valley view 7. Beryl Street --800' north of Issue to Banyan 40 8. Beryl Street —Bavyas to and 45 9. Base Line Road —hest city licit to Carnelian 45 146 10. Bane Line Band— Careeliss to Raven 4C 11. Careelien Street— roothM to and 45 12. Eighth Street --Grove to Raven 45 13. Htivanda Aveuue— Foothill to Rigblaad 45 14. 3lghlaud AvenurAxsthyst to Archibald 35 15. Crwe Avecue—Eigbth to Foothill 40 16. Turner Avenue—Eigbtb to roothill 45 17. Sapphire Street -19th to Lemon 40 18. Sappbire Strost— Banyan to and 45 19. Vineyard Avenue—Cherch to Base Line 40 20. Vbittrem Aveaus—Etawands to east city limits 40 21. victoria Park Lane 35 22. Banyan Straat —from vast city limits to 400' 40 east of Archibald 23. Hillside Road —from Beach Cate to Amethyst St. 35 24. Church Street -from Archibald Avenue to 40 Haven Avenue 25. Sao Bernardino Road —from Vineyard Avenue to 35 Archibald Avenue 26. Victoria Aveaue from Etivands Avenue to 40 Route 15 (Ord. 169 Section 1 (part), 19821 Ord. 39 Section 5.1, 1978). Rancho Cu-amoaga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty -five (65) Kilos per hour and fifty -five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are core than are reasonable or safe; (11) She miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are Rost appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe an said streets or portion■ thereof; (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the price facie speed limits on @rid streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorised and directed to Install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the price facie spend limit declared herein. The City Clark aball certify to the passage of this Ordinance and @ball cause the same to be published as required by law. SECTION It The Mayor shall sign this Otdlnance and the City Clerk @ball cause the asero to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least coca in She Deil. Renert, a newspaper of general etrculatio• published in the City of Ontario. Californis. asd circulated it the City of Rancho Cacemongn. California. PASSED. APPROVED. and ADOPTED this a day of e. 19a. 4 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR FISCAL 7 19 L ,cN L iLMUNff -Wraw ABSTRACT: In accordance with HUD requirements, Staff has prepared the re m nary Statement of Community Objectives for the Fiscal Year 1986/87 Community Development Block Grant Program. The City has received proposals for six programs /projects for a total cost of $1,106,000.00. Based on an anticipated Block Grant of $340,000.00, approximately $278,000.00 will be available for project funding. The ilkcorrespond to preliminary of those projects which most closely The six proposed projects are described in this report. In addition, the City's policies on relocation assistance for those affected by Block Grant funded artivitie°, and on flood hazard protection for rehabilitation of homes in the flood plain are included, as required by HUD. At Statement tofs Community Council review attached he floodhazard protection mitigation measures presented in this report. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has participated in the City. n Block an application arto the UPS. Department of Housing and Urban Development to secure funding for specific p Funds are which 1 cated further tospecified local jurisdictions based on a formula which considers the City population, instance of poverty and instance of overcrowding in the City. In Fiscal Year 1986 -87, amount Cucamonga funding g bwillalnoot b knownimunetdil $340,000.00. end of eAprilfinal Approximately $62,000.00 of this will be used in program management administration, and the required Fair Housing Services, leaving at the Fed0eral Because of RanchoeCucam:onga is expected to receive is less than last year. Generally cities may have their funding cut by approximately 30%. Several factors contrio-te! to this funding Cut. They are a 10% across the board cut from Cony.ess, a 3600 million /4 6 CITY COLMIL STAFF REPORT COBG Application for Fiscal Year 1986 -V Karch 20, 1986 Page 2 nationwide deferral of release of BlW* Grant funds, and a 4.3% cut across the board as a result of the Grace ->tudaan Act. In addition, new urban counties (suck as Ventura County) hrne became eligible for Block Grant monies, :2a.ifhg lass money to be divided, ason more government entities. Federal regulations specify that projects and activities which are selected for funding mist meet certain eligibility criteria which are sly rized below: The activity must be carried out in a Peighborhood consisting predominantly of persons of low and moderate inane and Provide services for such persons. In Rancho Cucamonga, only the North Torn and Southwest Cucamonga neighborhoods qualify under this provision. The activity must involve facilities designed for use predominantly by persons of low and moderate income; or The activity must involve employment of persons, a majority of whus are persons of low and moderate income. Based an these guidelines, the Planning Division solicited proposals for projects to be funded under the Community Development Blatt Grant (CCBG) Program. Four new projects were submitted for funding in addition to two ongoing programs (including Fair Housing Services). Each project is described in detail in the project description sheets contained in the Preliminary Statement of Community objectives. Staff has evaluated these projects on the basis of Federal regulations and the Preliminary Statement of Community objectives. The total amxuht of funding requested for Fiscal Year 1986 -87 is S1,106,00D.00. However, approximately $278,000.00 is available for direct project funding. The projects are summarized in the attached table. The projects are: 1. Housin Rehabilitation: Continuation of a lousing tat on vrogram that coffers below market interest rate loans and deferred loans, to lower income persons or families, and home improvement grants for minor repairs to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons. Activities fulled Include: outreach /public Informatign, home improvement loans, and emergency repair grants (senior citizens and disabled only). Requested Funding: 580,000,00 2. Southwest Cucamrn as Park Site Acouizitir This is a new project proposed for multi-year u �: The Lity would acquire a park in the 3outhrest Cucamonga target area. The /1� F Clrr COAMCIL STAFF RCPORT CG3G Application for Fiscal Year 1936 -87 March 20, 1986 Page 3 total cost for aaryisition is ntimated at 5300,000.00. Because the census information did not show the residents of the area to be predominantly low and moderate income, a special survey of the area was completed in January, 1985, to qualify the project for CWG funding. Requested Funding: S300,000.00 3. Senior Shared Housing: This 1s an ongoing program providing a watching program for those wio wish to share their home with senior citizens in need of housing. The project is eligible under Block Grant regulations since it serves those of lower incomes. The level of participation, so far, has been I nited, However, this is a new program and the demand for this type of service may increase as time goes on. The need for continuation of the program cannot be determined at this time. Requested Funding: $6,000.W 4. Turner Avenue gidenin : This wi:l involve the construction of a s, gutters, sidewalks. street lights and, where needed, retaining walls to widen the east side of the street. The project is eligible under Block Grant regulations because Horth Tom is a low and moderate income area. Requested Funding: $225,000.00 5. Southwest Cucamon a Street I rovements: This project Involves selected streets n u st ucamonga target area. The Project includes the following streets north of Arrow Route between Sierra Med.4 and Grove Avenues: Sierra Madre Avenue, Avenida vejar, YIa Carrillo. The proposed improvements include Pavement rehabilitation, the construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks and the installation of street lights. A special survey of these streets was completed to January, 1985 which quualifies this project for C09G funding. Requested Funding: $295,000.00 6. Grew Re Improvements: This project includes pavement r ne5 outtat on, the construction of concrete curb, gutters and sidewalks and the installation of street lights along Arrow Foote between Grove and Sierra Madre Avenues. Arrow Route was included in the special survey of Southwest Cucamonga streets and is qualified for Block Grant funding. Requested Funding: 5200,00.00 /21) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SDBG Application for Fiscal Year 1986 -87 March 20, 1986 Page 4 RunOCnglOi ASSISTANCE orPOanCY :cipated of n 1986a871vwould proposed the displacement of residents or businesses. However, in the event that displacement should occur, provisions for relocation assistance will be made in conformance or with the City's adopted Relocation Policy and the requirements of state and federal law. FLOOD HAZARD PRUTECTION: Although most of the water courses in the City eve FA Chann2f Z� ed io reduce flood hazards, there are some areas which are potentially subject to flooding in a 100 -year flood (see attached map). There are residential structures within the floodptain which could be eligible for participation in the rehabilitation program if the owners meet the income requirements. CDBG regulations require the City to develop policies addressing this problem. In accordance with Executive Order 11988, staff - nnsidc.—d alternatives to rehabilitation of housing in the flood hazard areas ono found them impractical or undesirable. One alternative would be to exclude residential units in these areas from the rehabilitation program mid encourage uarantee that cothe ruse nwoulde change aand olow h u income residents the properties would have no way to finance any necessary repairs of their units. As a result therefore be more subject to to substandard conditions and flood damage. Another alternative would be to relceate the residents and remove the units from the flood hazard areas. This would be impractical and quite expensive. In addition, the identified flood hazard areas encompass a mix of residential, public, commercial, and industrial uses. Removal of 'he residential use would neither remove the danger of flood damage and injury nor return the flood area to its natural state. Therefore, the City has determined that rehabilitation of the units in the flood hazard area is the must practical and desirable alternative. In order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for any units which are •enabilitated under the program, the County of San Bernardino requires that federal flood insurance iscoverage before their rloansaare funded. evidence of requirement applies to all loans to Rancho Cucamonga. ANALYSIS: In consiiering project funding for Fiscal Year 1986/87, Staff as rev eyed each of the proposals on the basis of eligibility under Block Grant criteria, status as an ongoing or obligated program /project and project priority in terms of need within the City. A substantial Housing Rehabilitation /Repair program is a virtual requirement of Block Grant programs. The Southwest Cucamonga Park Acquisition and Southwest Cucamonga streets projects are multi -year in nature and the City already 1-21 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT $ CDBG Application for Fiscal Year 1986 -67 March 20, 1986 Page S committad substantial funds toward their Implementation. However, Southwast Cucamonga Park Site Acquisition would need substantially more money than is available for all program funding. Therefor,,, based on the available level of funding, it appears that the most appropriate proj,cts to be funded are the Housing Rehabilitation /Repair program, and one or two of the other eligible projects. Since total costs for these projects slightly exceed the funds available, the Council will need to determine appropriate funding levels for each. RECOK4ENDATI14S: Staff rec- amends .aat the Council adopt the attached ell— es-fon relting to the following actions: 1. Determine that the continuing operation of the housing rehabilitation program for homes located in the 100 -year flood plain is an appropriate alterative and the proposed mitigation measures are adequate. 2. Select the preliminary funding: a. Housing Rehabilitation, and b. One or two other eligible projects and determine funding levels for a total amount not to exceed $278,000.00. n Respectfully submitted, Ott K* -- ' Senior Planner OK:RY/ns Attachments: Preliminary Statement of Comcunity Objectives Relocation Assistance Policy 7Q- IM loo You Flow OwNd ry NorthA City of Rancho Cucamonga , 1 173 100 Year Flood PWn b� 0 �F �r 0 0 A 0 A V y e 9ti� n �6 N � Y qn9 0 0 A 0 A oil 9 1 l� w 8 3 wy V Q IJ Yi 'may, 6j @f m w .a n<Y9Y V y N � Y qn9 oil 9 1 l� w 8 3 wy V Q IJ Yi 'may, 6j @f m w .a n<Y9Y RESOLUTION Nn. Pp9K3-(%R dip - 70 A RESOLUTIONI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOKA ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COtt)UNITY OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COIM4lTt DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRAUT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986/87. WHEREAS. the Si!° cr rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regu a:ions governing the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, notice of the availability of funds for eligible projects w" published in the Daily Report and mailed to interested community groups; ar" WRREAS, the City Staff has received proposals for projects and programs from various organizations in the Community; and WH7tEAS, the City Staff has conducted a needs assessment to determine program ellg'bility and needs; and WHEREAS the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing In order to live he public an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations for program funding and to put forth for Council .onsideration recommendations for their owr, and AIEREAS, the City Council has heard public testimony and received al: public input regarding the City's Community Development Block Grant Program for the next program year. NO./, THEREFORE, BE 1T ?F;OLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actior . A. Determine that operation of the Housing Rehabilitation progr® in the flood pain is the most practical and desirable of the alterntives, and the proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. B. If relocation of households or business is necessary as the result of a Community Development Rlock Grant program, the adopted relocation policy will be fo lowed. C. Select for preliminary funding the following projects and programs to be funded out of the :sty's Community Development Block Grant award: K /75- i Resolution No. P03 -20 -03R Pae 2 Project/Program Amount 1. Housing Rehabilitation S 80,000 2. Turner Avenue Widening $225,000 3. SW Cucamonga Street Improvements $295,000 4. Arrow Route Improvements 1200,000 5. Senior Shared Housing S 6,000 6. Southwest Cucamonga Park Acquisition 2330,000 Local Costs /Program Implementation a. Future Projects S 7,000 b. Program Administration S 20,720 c. Programs Management $ 19,780 d. Fair Housing Services S 7,'_00 e. Contingency $ 7,000 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King. Mayor ArrL:T 3eva ry-W. - t. a et, ty er I BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cuctmonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at ofregulaar ispacial, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. cver y A. Authelet. City Clerk fo AFFIDAVIT W rV KICA14VL STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO i sa T, nonna N. Hunflnaer ,do hereby certify that I am the Le" Advarti4t Clerk of THE DAILY REPORT, a dally nwsgper of `aneral dMilation, b1fle'ed In the Qttyy of Ontario, QWO and State aforesaid and that the attached advectiaecoert of Notice o} Puolic tlearin! 9ancho Cucanonla was pubibMtdIn SAW newspaper -Pa fine _ t0wit:Harch in, lose 'raw penalty �Of/pye� NW that the fcrcgotng is hve and correct ��il I1, �A1M_1•M (Slp acure) )ated at Ontario, Callftvnia this loth day of Mnrc� �Ob 177 CITY OF =.'CHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TOs City Council and City Manager FROM: 2obert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwocd, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF ANNEXATION 86 -1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEMS: AND APPROVAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND FILING OF NOTICS OF DETERMINATION. BACKGROUND: On March 5, 1986, City Council approved a public hearing for the Environmental Assessment of (Day Crock Drainage System) for March 20, 1986. The boundary of Annexat!on 86 -1 is described as follows: Beginning at the Centerline Intersection of Highland Avenue (66 feet wide); thence Northerly along the Centerline of said Milliken Avenue 2652 feet to the North line of the Southwest one quarter of Section 30, Townsnip 1 North, Range 6 West. San Bernardino meridian; thence East along said line and the North line of the Southeast one quarter of Section 30, 4034 feet to the Centerline of hochester Avenue, 2640 feet to the Center- line of Highland Avenue; thence West along the Center- line of said Highland Avenue, 4018 feet to the point of beqinning. Containing an area of 245.00 gross acres, more or less. No new facilities ara proposed for Annexation 86 -1 and the facilities in the existing area can serve the property and territory within the area to be annexed. EVALUATION_ An Environmental Review Application, Initial Study Part One and Two has been completed; it was determined that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Con- sequently, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the Negattve Declaration for Annexation 86 -1 and the filing Of the Notice Gf Determination. Respectfully Submitted, Ro e�zo Assi .ant city Manager JBP:kmm Attachments Environmental Review Application, Initial Study Part One and Two Environmental Assessment Notice Negative Declaration l:otice of Determination /79 FA CTY_oF RAI7CHO CUCAMONGA PART II - LYITIAL STUDY E\YIRO.YT--\TAL CHEMIST FIL «:G DATE: LOG h'C:3ER• _ i FROJEO: LOCAT16.4: I. nVIRO`.`^'STAL LMPACS (Explanation of 911 "yes" mad "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1 Soils and Geoloev. Will the proposal have a1gnL'SCant results Sn: A. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptlens, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C, Change in topography or ground surface — contour intatvala? d. The destruction, el,,rie or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _- a. Any potencial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting elthar on or off site conditons? f. Changes in arocinn siltatao,., or deposition? -- g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazard.? h. An increase in the race of extraction and /or "a of any mineral resource? 2. Hydrology, Will the proposal have aignificant results in: o /Q Page 2 a. Change in the eharecteristies of apeeies, including diversity, dL.tributlon, or mcber of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare / or endangered species of pla•,ts? ✓ /y/ — __ _ v TES Y.rT3E �D a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing stre acs , rivers, or cphezxral screw b. Changes !a absorption rates. drainage paste: or the race and azoumt of surface water tvnotf? !� c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood _ waters? d• Wang* 12 the aza ©t of surface water is any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration Of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? - y S' Clangs in the quantity of grouadvacers, either through direct additions or with. drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? b The reduction in the asswat of water ocher wise available for public water supplies? f/ 1. Exposure of people o, property to water related hazards such as flooding or Belches? All T. Air Walin. Will the proposal bave sigmLftcant resules in: a. Constant or periodic air ezicslocs fron mbile or indirect cources? v Stationary sources? -- - b. Deterioration of a -bient air quality and /or interference with the attait —t of applicable air qualirf standards? -- c. Alteration of local or tegioml cLt=tic ccaditicr - affecting air covenant, misture r temparature? - G. Biota - Flocs. Will the proposal have significant results !a: a. Change in the eharecteristies of apeeies, including diversity, dL.tributlon, or mcber of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare / or endangered species of pla•,ts? ✓ /y/ — __ _ Page 3 ' b. WLU project costs be a u =z, y discrfbute —YES % %Y3S KO C. Introduction o: new or disruptive species of Plants Into as at"?' -- / d. aednc -'ran In eye potntfrl for afritaltural V roduct!20 Fauna. Will the Proposal 'have significant results in: �/ a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diva:-siry, dis -e- utiom, or rot =tees of 2=7 species of acL -slay J� b. 8escelaa of the cu -bets of any unique, rare or endangered apecies of aa' =aL7 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of a=+ -M'- iota an aces. or result in a barrier to the 121.6=ari02 or movement of sal =als7 d. Dete- saration or removal of existing fish or vitdt +!e babitat7 S. Poualatioa. WIL+ the proposal have sigalfieaar results in: a Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, dcsity, diversity, or Zt. th rate of the h..-.- population of an at"? b. Will the proposal affect existing b,"I S, ar =cute a dead for additional bousimg? // 6. Socio --= u-Mjc Iaetnes. WLU the proposal bava sig- .iticanc results in. a. Chugs In local or regional socio- economic ehara:tarLtica, Z Xlud -ng economic or Cn— rcial diversity, tax rate, and propertr ralues? b. WLU project costs be a u =z, y discrfbute among project beseficla L - . i a., buyers, tax payers or project, ai a? y 7. land Cse and Pla r Considerations. Will the proposal hive sigmlf+'. -' results in? a- A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? Y �/ b. A camfiitt with any designations. objectives. poLlcies, or adopted plans of any gwerunental entities? n. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing eanaum:ptive or nao-cnncumptive recreational opportunities? 194 raugw 7=S EA g. irao tt�. gill �a-DroDtsal Gave s1�3£,icasr reaoita ta. a• Caneratica of sobsunriai adds =octal vahjcmL,, nsveseat? s. Increases in traffic hazard, to cuts, sehtcles,. bicyclists or pedascr.'Jas? 9. Cult=s_ 1 g— arses. 9111 the proposal have -- sfgntLlAct results in: a. A disturbance to the t,teg =try of arehamIoglcsl„ palaostclogical, and /or historicalreaou. -ses? _ 10. Eealth. St -*a" and Notsanea Paetars 9 proposal have slgitftcan[ ras¢itI=_ ill tYc a. Creatlan at =7 :iaalth hazed hacard? ar Potential. heath -- b. Effeeta on existing streets, or dcacd for _- c. se" street caneruc=i_n? C. Effects oa existing P `- .-a..., - ---mss. ar de"'M for new i d. Parking? d. Subzc,, ` t1?--, sct upon existing -Ar tlon sy Lzsnspazs- !• Increase in QJCScg mtse gavels? e. Alterations to prewar f. patterns aP Lion or Cove==t of Peale and/or gocns7 f. Alterations to or. affects an present and patential.ucar -barn., rw, tans rand or air craf -Lc. s. Increases in traffic hazard, to cuts, sehtcles,. bicyclists or pedascr.'Jas? 9. Cult=s_ 1 g— arses. 9111 the proposal have -- sfgntLlAct results in: a. A disturbance to the t,teg =try of arehamIoglcsl„ palaostclogical, and /or historicalreaou. -ses? _ 10. Eealth. St -*a" and Notsanea Paetars 9 proposal have slgitftcan[ ras¢itI=_ ill tYc a. Creatlan at =7 :iaalth hazed hacard? ar Potential. heath -- b. Exposure of people to potearial health batarewr .e c. A risk of explosion or release of u, sabstaaces la the event of as :.-- •a�..� C Ae tj d. An increase is the co=yer of ftdivld,,:• or species of vector or pachecuge_,a .- x or the exposure o£ peapla to such organiart? !• Increase in QJCScg mtse gavels? f. Exposure of people to pocam i l y dangerous noise levels? S' The creation of objeetiombla o&.? b. An tacr.ase to light wr glee? -� /$3 I p�o5 Page S c , 11. Aea cheeses. Will the proposal have HO results in: significant a. The obstruction or degradation of nny oca, lc vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? ' e. A eomfller with the ouleetive of designated or potential «emit corridors? 1:. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have -., a sltaificanc aced for new syatess, or alterations to the following: a. Electric povert b. Nat—al or packaged gns7 -- e. COmmunitations ayacens? — ✓ d. Water supply? e. Wastevater facilities? _— y f. Flomd control structures? S. Solid waste facilities? — ✓ b. Fire Protection? 1. Ponce protection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other racreatiansl facilities? 1. ?irincanance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other gcvarceneal services? 13. E• 'crew and Seat,. geaauteas. 17111 the proposal ha�a algnlfitant resultelnln: a. Vac of substantial or excessive fuel or cnntgy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? ✓ e. An increase in the demand for developnenc of acv sources of energy? d. Am increase or perpetuation of the consumption Of non- renewahle fours of ena; renewable sources of energy arc e available? Page 6 YES Y1IS_ NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or stores natural resource? 14. Mandate" FinClnas of Sisniflesnce. a. Dots the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or uildllfe species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a Aint or antral community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endan;ered plant or animal or eliminate important =&::plea o: the major periods of — -- / California history or prehistory? b. Does thr �rojsct have the potential to achieve short -t tm the disadvantage of long -tern. emviranm.ICal goals? (A short -term, impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of tim while long- to= impacts wi11 endure well into the future) _ (/ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerabla means that the incremental affacts of sn individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable futura projects). Jz d. Dies the project have environmental effaces which will cause substantial adverse nffeets on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF E\'VTdO?�IIAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affix. cave answers to thn above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation 'meryjt�urec)) 1� /mil ?'5 III. DEI°@CI`tATIOn On the basis of this initial svaluscion: I find tha proposed project Cam Nor Dave a siguificaac effect on the esrironaenc, ad a TcOATIVE DECLUAIIOy vitl be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a ■ignifiaaac affect on the a¢vironxnt. there viii not be a significant effecc in this casa because the aitigation ^ " ,auras described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A !'EC=T DECLABATIO.Y ;JILL BE Pp3ARED. I flyd the proposed project MAY hay* i sigaifi c effect on the ea /v //ire¢• and /a�n�E.`i7igO�D'� IAC R30t; requited. Data Ace •C(/ • � 1 (1 Im Page Y E-NL MONAMNTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INIMA.L STUDY - PART I GENERAL For all projects r-quiring environmental revirm, this fora must he completed and submitted to the Develapment Review Cc:aittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Iritial Study and make rec�endations to Planning Coamission. The Planning Cu;.miszian will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant fnvirommentil isgact and a Negative Declarntian will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental lraact Repurt %ill be prepared, or (3) Ai additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed:_ March 3. 1986 Project Title: awwrlra•rrnw nn v9-1 rni App t'_ant's Name, Address, TelephcneYNL{.f . 9.20 Base Line Road, P.O. Box •elePhone No.: (7141 989 -185. 'game, Andress, Telephone of Person T1 Concerning this Project: P.O. Box 807., Rancho Cucamona, FACILITIES DISTRICT 710. 84- Rancho Cucamonga Be Contacted CA Tel. No. (714) 989 -1851 Location of Project. eetveen�he�xt_n Sion of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension Of Rochester end n on �st and west. Assessor's Parcel No. "c`i4i_he. 7319. pi 2s_1E1_n, ..__.._� List other Permits necessary frog local. regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: N/A 1 -1 • PROJECT DESCRIPTI011 Proposed use or proposed project: ANNEXATION NO. 05 -1 COX4UNITY PA C[LITIES-DISTRICT NO 84 -1 (DAY CREE DRAINAGE ;YSTEM)� N N, PACILITZES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE AREA TO BE ANNP.XED, AND THE AS SyT FORTH WITHIN THE EXZGTING DISTRICT CA!7 SERVE THE PriOPERT DES TERRITORY WITHIN T11: AREA 11 r Acreage of project area and square footage of existingq and oraposed buildings, if any T ON 86 -I'S APPROXIMATE ACRES iSRE 240. i Describe the enviro.vnentat setting of the project Site including tnfmraatlan an topography, zo staoi ty`, giants (treesi, land antrulz, an;• cultural, historical or sCenit aspects, land use of sl.rroand a proper dA." and the descripption of any exisitng structures and their use •• theets) (a. tech necessary " Is the project part of a larger, project one of a actions, which although. individually small, series Significant environmental Impact N/A may as - wbole have rr p ¢ j -2 �70 ,n.l. HILL VIS PROJECT: YES HG 1. Create a substantial change in g -ound rantours? Z. Create a sabscantial change to existing noise of produce vibratica or glarel _ X 3. C.eate a substantial change in demand for minicioal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing Zcning or General Plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): N/A 7. Estimate the =o -nt of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: N/A S. :sttmate the number of auto and truck tri -• generatec daily by this projtct: N/A 9. Estimate the amount of 3rading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: ",A 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, c=plete the fora en the next page. N/A CERTIFICATION: I he -aby certify that the statements furnished shove and in the attached exh'bits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and fnfor,nation presented am true and currect to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further •n,ierstand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adeluate evaluation Can be made by the Planning Division I n A Date: Mwrrn n iog6 Si4natur�eTL('r14 4), 'f ' Title �.__--- -` ^- -- - - -- - "--` 1-3 A / RESIUE°IT1AL CTISTRUC The following information should be pr;vided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Oivitlon in order to aid the school district in assessing their ablli ty to accc.^adate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for acc =odating the Increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Naze of Develop,- and Tenta "•,e Trac• No.:�,,(� Specific location of Project. N/A 1 Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family Units: 3. Date proposed to begln construction: 4 Earnest data of occupancy: Model@ and 4 of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Rance PHAS'e I PHASE 2 P4ASE 3 PHASE 4 MILL 1 -4 ( / Ue CITY OF RANCRC CUCAMO•IGA EVURONMENTAL ASSESSMENi NOTICE Complete environmental asaesements have been prepared for the following project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will be considering these assessments, staff's recom- mendation, and public input, at their meeting oe March 20. 1986 prior to making a final environmental Cetermination. Following is a brief description and location of project and Staff's recommendation on the project to be considered: ANNEXATION 140. 86 -1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYST_9) No new fa- ilities are proposed for the area to be annexed, and the facilities as set forth within the existing District can serve the property and territory within the area of annexation. The area will include approximately 240 acres of land located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland un the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the cant and west. Staff Recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration A copy of the Environmental assessment can be ra:ii4", at the City of Ranchn Cucamonga Planning Division offices located at 9340 Base Line Road, Suite •B', Rancho Circa onga, CA 91730. Written comments should be addressed to tN Planning Division at the above address or phonal at (714) 989 -le51. In addition, concerns can be addrdysoi iu the City of Rancho Cucamonga publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned. The meeting will beci� it 7:30 p.m and snall take place at the Lion's Pack Comminity Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. HrieF Description of Proiect: Annexation tic. 86 -1 Community Paciiity District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System). No new facilities are proposed fcr the area to be annexed, and the facilities as set forth within the existing District can serve the property and territory within the area of Annexation. Annexation 86 -1 consists of approximately 240 acres of Land, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue an the north and south, and between the extension. of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west - APN 225- 141 -08, 12 -19, 21 -28, 225 - 151 -01 through 03, 07, 08, 10 -23. 2. Namn and Address of Aoolicant: City o Rancho Cucamonga 93ZO Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 3 Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Caality Act of 1970, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has deter- mined that the above project will not have a signiticant effect upon the environment An Environmental Impact Report will not be required. 4 Minutes of ouch decision and the Initial Study prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are or. file in the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5 This decision may be appealed to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A written appal and filing fee must be received by the Planning Divisfri no later than 5:00 p m. ton 110) calendar days from :he date of the Planning Commission decision. 6 This Negative Leclaration is subject to the implementation of m'tigating measures (1f any) as listed on the attachments. DATED _ Jon D. Mikels Mayor Title CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF DECLARATION TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: (Public Agency) 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 City of Rancho Cucamong Sacramento, CA 95814 P.O. Box 807 or X County Clerk Rancho Cucamonga, CA County of San Bernardino 91730 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone No. (If submitted to Clearinghouse) 6 Milliken on the east 6 west - APN 225 - 141 -08, 12 -19, 21 -28; 225- 151 -01 through 03, 07, 08, 10 -23 ANNEXATION NO. 96 -1 TO COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 Project Description This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1 The project will, X not, have a significant effect on the environment 2 An Environmental Impact Report, was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3 Mitigation measures _were, X were not, made a condition of the approval of the project 4 A statement of Overriding Considerations _ was, X not, adopted fo. this project Date Received for Filing Signtture city Planner Title /0-1 Revised January 1985 A /NDAVI7 OR N4rLLt[an�+ - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTYOFSANDE LMWINO ss I. Donna fl. Hunsinaer . do hereby certify that I newspaper of general ofp�� the City of Ontario qty and State aforesaid and that tho attached advertisement of City of Rancho CucamcnBa "9$Publl+hedlnsaidnemspaper one time OWH' (larch 7. 1986 I artlty under li^nslty of perjury that the [oro60t118 is true and tore) Dated at Ontario. Cailtornta this 7th day of March l8 a6 ,' 'F Ss xna CITY OF RMICHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ctro DATR: March 13, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manaqer FROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fnlwaaa, Assessment Revenue CoordimLcr SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOL'JTION APPLLCARLE TO ANNEXATION 86 -1 BACKGROUND: O,; February 5, 1986, City Council adopted the boundary map showing territory and property to be annexed to existing Community Facilities District. The boundaries are between Highland and Banyan Avenue South and North and Rochester anO Milliken Avenue West and East. Additionally, the Resolution of Intent to annex territory into existing Community facilities District was adopted. The facilities of the original Distric� 80 -1 will provide for the needs of the annexed territory. The original facilities includes a primary drainage facilities; this includes a Debris Basin for flood water retention and reclamation. Additionally, it includes major flood control channel improvements existing from the Debris Basin to the Southerly boundary of The City of Rancho Cucamonga (Fourth Street;. Furthermore, a resolution ordering the annexation report was approved, and a public hearing was set for March 20, 1986. EVALUATION: A Resolution Making Preliminr.ry Findings and Passing Upon Protest, and the Resolution Declaring Annexation of Territory to Exist.ng District and Authorizating Submittal of Special Tar Levy to voters are presented for approval. Prior to the public hearing City Staff and Consultants provided a workshop to address ;roperty owners question concerning Annexation 86 -1 Additionally, there is no proposed adjustment in the tax rate for the annexed territory and the same tax rate as set forth in the origins. District is proposed to be levied in the annexed territory. The present maximum levy pet acre is 5550.00. However, for fiscal year 1085;86 the actual levy por acre was $350.00. Therefore, the $350.00 per acre can be paid by property owners in proposed assessed area prior to July 1, 1986, otherwise, it will be added to their Ifs �1\ c fiscal year 1986/87 assessments. Additionally, the formation and annexation coat of approximately 521,000 will be allocated among all prcperties being annexed. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Resolution Making Pre =nary Findings and Passing Upon Protest, and the Resolution Declaring Annexation of Territory to Existing District and Authorizing Submittal of Special Tax Levy to voters be approved. Respectfully Yours, /rt o Aseist,�i ty Manager JBP:kmm Attachments: Order of Procedure Resolution Making preliminary Findings and Passing Upon Protest Resolution Declaring the Annexation of Territory to the Existing District Area ORDER OF PROCEDURE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA ANNEXATION NO. 86 -1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) DATE OF PUBLIC HARING: MARCH 19, 1946 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION: PUELiC HEARING ON ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO A14 EXISTING COMMONITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZATION TO LEVY A SPECIAL TAX MAYOR: Announce that this the time and place for the public hear- ings relating to the Annexation No. 86 -1, Community Facili- ties District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System). This public hearing relates to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District and the auth�rizatlon to levy a special tax CITY CLERK: Announce +hat notice of the public hearing has been gl. -e and that the following affidavits are on We in her offs- : 1 Affidavit of publication of Notice of Intention to :nnex territory to an existing Community Facilities District and authorize special tax; 2. Certificate of Compliance relating to mailing of notice. STAFF: General presentation of the following: A. Boundaries of existing Community Facilities District; B. Extent of territory proposed to be annexed; C. Explanation of rate and apportionment formula for special tax; ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHOULD BE COPIED AND DELIVERED TO EACH MEMBER OF TAE LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. END OF STAFF REPORT - OPEN FOP. PUBLIC DISCUSSION MAYOR* REQUEST THAT EACH PERSON WHO SPEAKS GIVE HIS NAME AND ADD- RESS, AND STATE WHETHER HE IS A PROPERTY OWNER OR A REGIS- TERED VOTER. First, ask to hear from anyone who wishes to protest against: A. The annexation of territory to the existing District; B. The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax. Next, ask for those who wish to speak in faxnr of the proceedings. /97 ORDER OF PROCEDURE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ANNEXATION NO. 86 -1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) DATE OF PUBLIC FEARING: MUCH 19, 1986 STAFF: Final presentation of protest count of registered voters and owners (Y of area). STAFF: Discussion on proceedings, any chan3es and modifications as appropriate, and explanation of alternates available. CITY COUNCIL: By motion, declare the public hearing CLO.ZD. IF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WISHES TO PROCEED: IF THERE ARE NO MAJOR CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS, THE LEGISLATIVE BOOM SNOMN.D cakm R THE FOLLOWING: CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RES^LU'ION MAKING PRELINLYARY FIMINGS AND PASSING LPON PROTESTS CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESDLUTIOH DECLARING ANNEXATION OF TER216gtY TO £XISTIN6 PISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF SPECIAL tAr LEVY TO VOTERS rimIr wiry • IItacwrmg to. 8(P - 7l IInaLDTIO, or TR CIII CDpCIL a Its CIx a gAlICtO LUCANNaCA. CALIPON�IA. tAK K CpIAN7 Pt6IIMI ALto rl7'JN,CS AiD PASSING DPoO Mamie CALITDNafAVDAr"' the CITY Coo1CIL of the C RMC110 CDCALWA (bvelaolta n$tercal to ce q• "1q(cltti • body of the local �p ") KertovalT dse3arN its intestine nod coodactsd Preceedla e rnlatlw,� tonatha aaaaastlos of territtp to a ottetteg Cewrtcy Paeliltl�a Diitrlst Daneane to the tare 1151 Prevision$ of the Mello -Mea Ceaal raeilltias Act of 1352', being CbnUter 2.3, port 1, Dbis(en 2, Title 3 e[ tYi oratxetot Code of the state of California, ad epeltitalll Article 3.3 tea; toL the a:iatlag Coawdtj Lailttia District has bap doaisnated Coota RITY rACILoIIp he Dist is s), a (DAT CIIStr DSAINADt MTN" (Persia fter re /erred to as the 'Dlsertet )l so! Vetnt, the area ProPeud to be aaoted to bears od dsaigoated a CI s Cow"Ix�ACILITIpDI/AICI to. S4_1 • (DAT CIIpI DtALVACt SYSTM f horeioafter enforced to at the "aaysed torrtterr ")l aN territory t��' strict of the a Fob bearing relating to the asasatla of tarnishiingtof certainrfacilitiess't'l alltother related rtttn beg been ed and a "Asootag(oo po ott" . the this Agency and Ls ►am r to •aarad 'I thin Ageacy, has bap sire, to taoietlp e! Intention to tenon territ of the record at the bestial the op to aid DGtrictg nod eiv@d been VEMVS• it hen am b@@" deterdned that vrittto Protests have act roe then ms- If (1/2)�orr wre of tte area of of led 01anr rgzepntl District or within the original Dlatrictl sad Propted to be entered sore to ui/ terzlrecy to the all cos'eNr�Qs"'e's "'Otift itto the annotation of the wto and eatho/ of aPPorticnpat of the s ocy to be etnrsN end the at this rise this Isgislativd body uit es, bade been ethe adged. end of territory to the Natrlct. r i� dalroee tr PrweM with tb• aasad. td, IpIIOolt, IT IS tpYf IMMYRD AS 7MLOVSr 122XI$1r That the above 7oeitale are all true and correct. /q'9 SECTION Zs Aat vrittan protests have not boon filed by fifty Percent (SOI) rr core of the registerad voters, or six (o) registered voters, whichever in greater, or property moors of core than one -half (1 /2) of the area of land proposed to be annexed to the existing District or of the original District. SECTION 11 PicOPt share changes and SCdificationa have been mode, if any, all protests and objections are hereby overruled and denied. SECTION az It is hereby further determined by this legislative body that all proceedings prior hereto relative to this concretion vara valid and taken in conformity with the requirnmeats of la, and specifically the provisions of the *Xello -Roos Conownity facilities Act of 19820. SESSION xz The "Annexatica Report ", as now submitted is hereby approved and is node a part of the record of the bearing, and is ordered to be kept on file rich the transcript of these proceedings and open for public Inspection. SECTION 6s It is hereby further determined by this legislative body to proceed with the annexatlon of territory to thv existing District, to be formally known and designated as "AMIIEYATIOM NO 86 -1, COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSYEM) ". PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *. 19*. AYES: NOESz ABSMTz Jeffrey Ring. Maycr ATTESTS Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk I. JEPEELY A. AOTRELE7, C171 CLERK of the City of Rancho %camaga. California, do hereby certify that the fcregning Resolution saw duly passed, wpproved, and adopted by the Cit;, Council of the City of Rancho Cucamnga. California, at • regular (SPaC12l. adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day of *. 19**. Nm RESOLUTION No. S � — 7Q— RESOLUTION or TPE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CIIr or RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFOCIA, DECLARM' T82 AnnExATion Or TERRITORY TO AN EXISIING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEST 07 SPZCIAL TAXES TO TCE QUALIPI61) ELECTORS WHEREAS. the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to at the "ledielativa boJy of the local Agency "). has previously declared its intention and conducted proceediag■ relatiog to the scoexation of territory to an exist! ng Cosuatnity Facilities District pursuant to the term and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Coaeunity Facilities Act of 19820, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title S of the Cowaraeeut Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. Tba existing Cosauaiay, Facilities District bes been designated COMMUNITY FACILITIR9 DISTRICT No. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) (hereinafter referred to as the "District "); sad VHERPA9, the area propomeo tc be annexed is known and designated as ANNEXATI0S N0. 86 -1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) (hereinafter referred to as the "&named territory"); and WHEREAS, inessuch as tbeae are less than twelve (12) registered voters residing within the territory proposed to be &named to the District, and ham been for at least the preceding ninety (90) days, this legislative body is desirous to subeit the levy of the required special tar to the landowners of the territory proposed to be aaaeeed to tba District, said landowners beta• the qualified electors es authorised by law. NOW. THERa>ORE. BR IT RESOLVED AS POLLGWSt SECTION It That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 1, That this legislative body does hereby declare the auoexation of the territory to the existinq Conouaity Facilities District, said sunned area town cad designated as "ANNEXATION g0. 56 -1, COMMUNITY PACIIITI83 DISTRICT ND. 84 -1 MY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) ". SECTION "t Y6at for particulars relating to the following, reference is lade to the previously approved Resolution of Iot ration and Anassation Report, both of which are on file is the Office of the City Clerk and open for Public inspeetiont A. Boundaries and parcels of land to be sunned. E. Eateut of previously aproved public capital facilities to be financed through these proceedings. 00/ C. Rate and method of apportionment of previously authorized and approved special tax fo- the entered territory. It is declared by this legislative body that the ease tax to previously approved and authorizes would be levied within the p,- oposed &named territory to pay for the authorized public capital facilities. 9EI2IOR At This legislative body herewith subdts the levy of the special tax to the qualified electoce, said electors being the landowners of the territor,' peeped" to be doomed to the existing District. with nscb landowner bavtag one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land wbicb he or she owns within the territory propasad to be anarred to the existing Community Facilities District. S=09 5: This legislative bcdy botchy further directs that a ballot proposition relating to the levy of the above referenced special tax be prepared. This Resolution shall constitute the notice of the election relating to the authorization to Icvy the special tax in tha &named territory. SLGSIM fit That this legialative body hereby expressly declared and statts that it is necessary to levy special taxes as authorized under the tarty and provisions of the °Mallo-Booe Commodity Facilities Act of 19820. in order to finance the pr.niwsly authorised public capital facilities, and that the seemed territory vball be subject to and pay a proportionate &scant of species tares to pay for said facilities. SECTION 7a The praposition related to the Is" of the special tsr within the entered territory .ball be submitted to the qualified voters at a special Glen tion, and said election shall be a special sailed ballot election to be conducted by the County Registrar if voters. If the propoaltioo for the levy of the special tax within the anucted territory receives the approval of rare than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes east on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in the Resolution of Intention to Amer. SECTION et That the ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows PROPOSITION BULL THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COMMOIITT FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 86 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) LEST A SPSCIAL TAY WITHIN THE BOOEDi RIES YES OF AERESATION NO. 86 -1 TO PAT FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC CAPITAL DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND PAT DEBT SERVICE ON A PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS, NO ALL AS DETERMINED HEC`SSARY TO MEET THE NEEDS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT WIT0IB ?BE COMMODITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. INCLUDING ANNEXATION NO. 86 -17 Mm The rate, method and apportionment for the levy of the special tar in the annexed territory shall not exceed $550.00 per acre, Which is the sane tar. rate as previously approved for the existing Community Facilities District. SECTION 9: That the appropriate mark placed is the voting square after the word "IES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, sad the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" is the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION :O; Argume.rts way be filed for and /or against the ballot meuure, and the Registrar of voters shall select ins of the arguments in favor and one of the arguments against the waasure for printing and distribution. The Registrar of Voters shall g:4a naafe:ence and priority in the following eequeace: A. The legislative body or any member thereof as authorized; S. Individual property moors or bona fide association of property owners or combinations of property waste and associations who are the bona fide sponsors or proponents of the measure; C. Bona fide associaticas of property meets; D. Iadividual property wears who are eligible to vote on the measure. gaT20B t11 That City Attorney is hereby diranttr to prepare an !mpartial analysis on the ballot proposition and file it with the Registrar of Voters. Such analysis sLall show the effect of the proposition on the existing law and the general operation of the proposed ballot proposition. SECTION 12: (a) That notice is hereby given that written arguments, not to =teed three Lundred (300) words in length, for or against the measures aba.l be filed not later than 5100 Y.M. on April 15, 1985, at the Office of the County Registrar of Voters, County of Sao Bernardino. (b) That say argument submitted for or against the meascre shall be accompanied by a statement set forth in Sectioa 5350 of the Elections Codes signed and completed by the autnor of such argument. aECTIOE 13t That if soy person submit:, an argument against the ballot proposition as not forth bereins and an arguasat has been filed in favor of the propositions the Registrar of Voters shall then Lonediately send a copy of that argument to the person filing the argument in favor of said ballot proposition. The parson filing the argument in favor of the ballot proposition nay prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not to earned two hundred fifty ;250) words The Registrar of Voters shall than recd copies of the argument in favor ballot propomitior to City Attorney. who then may prepare and submit a a�3 rebuttal argument to the argument in favor of the ballot proposition, such rebuttal argument not exceed two hundree fifty (250) words. The rebuttal argument shall be filed with the Registrar of Voters not zero than tea (10) days after the final date for filing the direct argument. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as direct arguments and each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut. SECTION 141 This right of rebuttal, as provided by this Resolution, Is applicable only to the ballot proposition relating to the proposed annexation of territory to the Community Facilities District, and shall not apply to any future District elections. SECTION let The foregoing provisions pertaining to the submission of arguments for or against the ballot measure, rebuttal argument and an impartial analysis shall be deemed to have been waived and shall be inapplicable to the election proceedings herein if the legislative body datermines that it has received a good and cuff icient written vaiver of said proceeding•. signed .y all of the qualified voters or legally authorized representatives of all of the qualified voters. SECTIM 161 The election for this Arumatiom No. 86 -1. Community Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System) shall be held on the 1514 day of July. 1986. SECTION lya The FNgestrar of 9oters is hereby authorized to takt any and all steps necessary for the holding of amid election. Said Registrar of Voters ab @1 preform and r.eder all services end proceedings _neidental to and connected with the conduct of said uleetion, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the tollovinge 1. Provide official ballots and ali •tber printed Wetter into envelopes for muting and cs..e the ass to be mailed as requirel b1 Irv. 2. Canvas the returns and furnish a tabulation rrl!tieg to the number of votes given in said proposition. 3. Conduct and handle all other r.stter.l relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in :he manner and form as required by lies. SPCT1011 let It is hereby further acknwl aged that the Regimes,- of Voters shall be reimbursed in full for ,my servics• rrforard by said kvgin.rar for thin service upon presatatioo of a biL to the Community Fwalieies District. 00 L 1 An ne �ntigCh= STATE OFCAIAWRNI/. ' COUNTYOFBANBERNBRDINO se I. Dunne M. Hunsinger diherdry certify that I am the Lepl Adveeftj dah of—THE DADAILY REPO�RKT,, antdaaiilly Co and tats o+aaid WA that the alts a0vvrti r�i ' .,I City of Rancho Cucamonga waspabL*MGtaaaidur VSper one time I{ to W't: March 7, 1989 1 ea I cc* wAw f vg t is paily ct perjury tint the tm and �= wwa�w MOra•.wlrvwrr w:a.wwwn.•r.nen .R•. a/ W<q.MIM j /j MJl1 M PA ` I t7 YnvM M nn rte•. fA arY r o, Q 1 rrs li a°`� wr�.r .w.ue r wuau erngrrrsouru,eaawwe ( ) /rrwrr.a ............ r rr•r F"eiw s.. a•. o.. 7th Dated at OataMo, GUfam.1 a tNt day of us•q r n. rr r F r.rwr rrr r .., r.w.rra•raar ra ra r.uu•ua aa•a.cr r r, ,rr aMaa a.s•u March 86 I3 I e.�.r Y[YrA•.Y/p'•YI�F.•n�/•�IIyY • y •rr wrr�r+a. a�•arr rrr � a m �n�e.arr r.ca+ro w rw ars K r ✓.r m. CoN`T N e K7 T>6 D n r � P a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 TO: Mayor and Hembers of the City Council FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BT: Curt junnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-048 RL - A request to amend the General Pla—n—T—an-T use _p_ from Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) to Office (in conjunction with the development of a senior citizen congregate living and care facility) on 4.85 acres of land, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west side of Cucamonga Creek, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208 - 211 -20, 21. ENV, RONMENTAL mSSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENUMENT 85 -07 - FORLSA - request to amen tee Ueve opment s r ci�{ap from Medium Residential (B -lf du /ac) to Office /Professional (in conjunction with the development of a senior citizen congregate living and care facility) on 4.85 acres of land, located on the south sine of Foothill Boulevard, west side of Cucamonga Creek, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208 - 211 -20, 21. I. BACKGROUND: The above - described General Plan and Development 0 s r ct endments were submitted in July, 198:., and subsequently reviewed by the Planning Commission in Scytem(er, and the City Council in November and December. The specific purpose of the amendme,.ts is to allow construction of a senior citizen congregate living facility and convalescent hospital as permitted under the Office /Professional District Regulations. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposal. However, the City Council was in favor of the project and cent nued the public hearing from the December 4. 1985, meeting, to -low concurrent review of the General Plan Amendment, Dave ipment District Amendment, CUP tpplication, and Development Agreement. However, as of the date of this report, the CUP application is still incomplete, and tie applicant has failed to provide development plans suitable for tviiw by the Design Review and Techn; cal Review Conmittees. Alin the required geologic fault study has not been completed. ao7 CITE COUNCIL STAFF PEPOnT GPA 85448 and ODA 85 -01 - Porlsa March 20, 1986 Page 2 V The applicant stated *:hat the delays resulted from unexpected committments to other projects which required their full attention. They are now ready to pursue the proposed senior citizen project and requested that City Council action on tha amendments be continued. A formal written request is attached. Little progress has been made an the Project since December. Processing of the Conditional Usa Permit and Development Agreement will take at least another three months, to allow concurrent review of all related applications. If this is not a concern to the Council, the public hearing can be continued to a specific date (June 18, 1986). II. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council has two options: continue the P:e1% esirfng or deny the General Plan and Otvelopnent District Amendments without prejudice if the Council is concerned with the delays. (Resolution attached.) Rdspectfglly submitted, (M�a�f Brad BulleArM92=1 City Planner BS:CJ:cv Attacnments: Letter from Applicant Resolution of Denial without prejudice City Council Minutes of 11/20/85 and 12/4/85 City Council Staff Reports of 11/20/85, and 12/4/85 X08 -- P It C K"AA UL6ue d March 12, 1986 N.. Curt Johnston Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Porelc Limited - Senior Housing Ganeral Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Johnston: Pursuant to our conversation of today and the desire of the City Council to hear the General Plan Amendment an] Development District Amendment requests, as well as, the Conditional Dan Permit application, for the above project, at one time and an consideratlon °f the schedule for doing so, as discussed with you in our conversation, we are hereby requesting an extention of the time for city processing to June 18, 1986. This should allow sufficient time for ourselves to respond to the city's needs and for the various city disciplines to review the applications. Thank you. Sincerely, R.M. Siat on MEW= RESOLUTION NO. 463 -e8wM g(B - -?3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY LOUNCIL OF THE CITY hF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, Of.NYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ENVIR0100TAL ASSESSMENT AKO GENERAL PUN AMENDMENT NO. 85 -04B, PORLSA, A PROPOSED AMENW.ENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROK MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -14 DU /AC) To OFFICE ON 4.85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST SIDE IF CUCAYONGA CREEK, WEST OF VINEYARD AVEMJE - APR: 208 - 211 -20, 21 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on September 25, 1585, to consider all convents on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 85 -G4B; and WHEREAS, the City Common held a duly advertised puL.lc hearing to consider all convents on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 85 -04B; SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council cannot make the following 'T5- ffings- A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the '.and Use Elmsent. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby denies without 1,rejudice General Plan Amendment No. 85 -04B. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19**. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: del trey King, Kayor v s t c bo at Conceit S- ar 4. ISIS ?,as g 1021001 Roma by Oeb1 to iat than pemt.d rd tuba back Lth as y,.rmag vLeb 0 d'/&c as the top amrtti• After dAcveaim, he ra.ciad big bans. Len being a farther pO1Lt Ulmit. Maur Kkata cloned the veblic bearing. IVr1CS. 0wd y King. retedd y 01Lels to a)p.ama the le..tutien sod emwrags the dnal.pr to nemeYt in the a-0 dame viw • waiver of the C.mttal Pln Pplkatim tan. Rori.s carried 4.0.1 (Krilbt absest) RUCWTIw S0. 2s-2ss A ga0lasto$ a nK CLTI CMCL fr. t6 Cin Of WCKO /DCAMMA. DnngG GpO4aL fl.al AKWM2 01 -040, YDSLf. $M0C$I00 Y - -Z"tgt It nK LUD SL00]I or In mcs0 COCA4lbCa GOna PLM vein[ LW VC•13II IIDIDMnAL (2-a OVIAC) r0MICH 921151IY glf ID'JIILL (4-14 D021C) rIM 13.11 002:3 Or LOAD LOCa2ID SWn W fti0 g00L,,UV A" KLf2 W agC01LD "out Ngor Nikala calla a tmnt at 10110 V, L. acting Cbaobaaaas at 1041 Pe~tb all grahams d the Commit pte.eat but Cemcilmnber Otigtt. (21) aC. Lcated ba the ebatb tilt vet faoeblil 5.11'. ,roc fib at Weam.la GrreL. mac d tiagard bate•. (OL3-03 Cp /J®tlpn (22) 2K13ISN.R• Irli aSSVervev +O v p R t -fonlf" feratY be w0 twel tide of tooe0411 boslnrri Roo side of C.caavol. Ca-k. beat Of VLagad beta•. (0203 -03 00 AMWn7) 2t.."U.ad from, segarl.r 20. 1903 morel". Staff rmotetwo ten it....cc ..tit Xamb If. 1106. pealing rat d prota iw a spl at the CodLtioml 0.. permit sW Crmelopmac IlrabaeaL by 4a Planning Cosena(... Cr. Wrneress aeat14 re ►m. abaelyd • letter C. cn.Utm the it" to batch. SVIIOI. Nerd by $matt. tmodd y fall to c ... in,, to grab 19. 1906. bsiba camnd 4-0-1 (vtLlbt sbtant). seef.I (23) aD. 1 UlIIi. A. rardbatt to tb E4al duerlptim at real "OPOrtl tOLmt to an altawat b.wm tlo Ciat si gu:be U.e..eal. and 61 -4 be. LcvatoatY rpad3eg a t it, arise[ bnesiq prejmt lensed rue It Archibald. ae the verdant of Laic Cebat. (0472-0L Cg0 vvrzzOI) the C W`etalrba�nda/. L be basting ter trCtic bearing. rre being ....spoon. flat Cetk betlelat rW the title Of Ordlteatd No. WA. MUM= No- 21)( (dm.d reYLng) 9 O, Cf 9/ In C1II CCDCIL c7 In CITY Of sA0cso (OCARNCa. CLLIt0a1A, ArrMC C A0 AM KM It. A Dt9tLCIM, p 2MINI Stimi D gtltti )Mint lt Nerd y OrO�ut, •Ronald y Vo a rave tall lending At Oedceaeee 0e. S!rA. N.siba amnia W -1 (Orlgbt .beget). N0120pe band by U.S. emeadd by ga(wt to Vprwc Odleoocn $n. 21(4 Notice ca"Ld "-I (Wright ababat). _. o.veec :sty Cwnc(t Maaaru . % °aroma, :0. 1985 Lp 3 l{. 0tte[e,MrWTI 1.4 [3Sw "T an wyL Ttt `e[r St, LO- u[N eo tba .ouch o(de of Foothill tavlewsrs. out We of Cec.ga.da C ... k, teat of Tlays,d dr.mo. itaff ryerc by Curtis Jobasso., Associate Il...er. 0103 -03 Cy d11ADMwJ. C. cit., Ilsp asked ". Jobastoo if be Isla Me Would have ay alpiticaet .pact oa the foetbitl 1.1s, at 4y. Mr, Jobastaa tespaNed that he felt this Ww10 oar bate a sl plfl,aac {pact w the Foothill ewtassrd study aed that it could be dealt With later. Myer Mikats yased the ratl,8 for p0blac hurtg. Addressing Cowcll were, ! Rickard dadrws. Tspr,uotle° Fe"1,. pste.tN tidal of a fell,, yrajert f to Riverside. Wit" areas. e...,.god Coeneirs ymoual of the project. r flPP. iRPadlP adN° 1tir�PPfO�t�a�,eQl'fai�pieile:• [avid..[. cesurrN with IJjs frost felt that there W. a t"auNtas dae,ae,i for this type at f.ill- ?bit ?"due. Cage Toltec* rasidaat. felt this was a treat rojest. Mr. toukr001, Gas Totaote residual. was sot is laser al the p,ejatc. Than bel,8 00 !.char *.pote. free Ise public !...lager Maysr U111418 Closed the public Couml1"ms Wright tepressed $be Wce is fewer Of the project. Cawoallma Dahl $toted be bed ►u. to the Uvertldt project ad felt 1t Wv eaeded Is the City. As did have we problem. 1. p*der toe JS roo/o °, the staff ad plas.(o[ Cc-1461" had bcudaN that this fall .Nee eke eetgsy of howl. ar felt this Wes 11, a hotel. We Would used a pal lay tree, Causal, oa sae{ • .dot eQLu etylrs .slag the a? .001,8. 3, at had problem with the hospital. C "mile,SA Igast rte support Is sup at the coacapa. but 'mid quality support ter a well sallow dasolopm.t Caaaeilma Dckl tilt Caaadl sboutd km a pelly that a clasps 1s as ap sow. to a ostler citizen project be adored by a dwalop.uet ,8reem.i. City atto"y. Jesus Mcrkma. stated that It C each waaud to gp,ere this le Come Pt ties Cogasll bas we choice$[ alto. and Us Lmlatloe se a0prewe this twlPt Which woull Ills okra a Casaral VISA Clear, Vick"; the possibility of datalepwan .{[bout a se.* cbengs. h, base • denloygaer gneraa which [emu a sew eksgs. Ale L ►iwssW with • tea day oo_ t(re. public burls= bate" tb* ?laSAl,8 Ceado.(ao a.t the 4a before the Cssaelt, two "tll ,8s of u etdi0awq ad a 30-dy Istria[ pearled. d d.elap- mat ,8r,emat tube, cdtut tour t0 sir se,acka, Cocedlaas t!,8 also evocarred that we should bass a dewsletga.t greorst aN tbtt veythlng toga beck at the u" air. XMCft Moved by Cis°, ameedN by vti&It to cat!". to the Cart "acted is md.r to give staff ad the sppliceet air to work set the details. Motto* card" voeaiswsly 3 -0, City 000@Cll M\autes raneWer 10. 1195 J no t RESOLUTION 90. SI -lli A RESOLMOR a TR1 CITY CUUNCtL Ur f1'. CITY Or AAdCNO COCAMp9CA. CaL1rO"lA. DMyMG GT11VJ: Tfn MDUMCS? 15 -0H. rORLSA, RIQOnTtNO u AMDOMUT To Of IATD US1 CE- MENT 01 TRf WCM CUCAMONCA Gur1AL Pw nm MDIOM mi- DDTIAL (4-14 OU /AC) To Dry"' DO 4.05 ML3 u LARD. LOCAT- ED ON THE SUCTR SOS or TOOTCLL NOOLNAM D . RrST S[ 01 COCAMONCA Clta. MOT Or 9uTYAW /TDOC - An 101 - 211 -20, 21 (10) mnUOxmar. u ]lfMblT lm ennOr T I CT MA 1012"! L ated an the oMtb tide of raaebill Noal"ard, east ride of CaustSe Croek, 'eat of Tiaeye" Ale-48. (020] -03 Do "MOMENT). eeete Name M1kele called • [stn at 9100 p.a. Tke wettat Two -tone at 9122 per With all Quaker, of Coeseil present. Issue eeeee♦ (21) AC. r+rtrTxnrat a]]'M r Ae* e eat" at the eMcbww carter eAre..,. wlmel -04 Merger inti 'Fort by Otte Rrwtil, toter neater, nanlat CaWe.lot T". a" d.atel of the Counsel nu AoeNosat. (0201 -05 Or AMnDMDT). Meyer little area" the eeetiaC for ►All: henries. Addressing Cwtrll wesu Peal Edwards. In ehege of plansin far the Israelis 1'Sro•ret4l Group. Rated they are evert of the City$ ""Iti[ltr to Ott "bed hwatce. 10ey felt tbedr Project •oeld be . mgle for other emlgen to as ewlata. The Net Mock Calgary b weed the nn. Mabilekoo. Pert ')nut to this !es a Saab., of yes'. SO, are a l.Nwger which retain@ their prof.... u Rory guru farutsrts eN a' [t "a'" .boat lode'pe aN b.11dis2 gp- Narues. SO 1 "0014804 Conseil'[ - Weal. W-4411 ley. 1101 DDlpbIl Terrace. C..... Del Nar. stated that be bad tan partuo !t Wl Wek Ca"eey They bare been devalapiq properties for W" Hsu. but say for tb.No.l[ts - they do .ot d'atap for eeyaa. nine. They would like to develop the proper'. Wuald A "gun. Walter. requested tsaestanaties of pill Caeadl- alrs'a ductal lam ' e foothill vagina was well Called far au► ur. rat P "wlb Traid.st of tea floss Mebil.bOm Pau, bad several concerts. bet •' bulcdlI --- ­04 $ -bat this IT jeac ed9bt end up eat batce cared for " sea The plus Mobl""'m park •bleb nu else wood a" asiatoised by the 1141 Mack Coopaey. Those bring no further pAlic T"Waes. Mgor Rlk.ir e1066i the pAlio besets. Coe"il.0 Rln tgoettad that tk1 Cuotat Piro ArAldent be deal". W tale that before Notice our Coastal it u allo "rob. no rsothlll 9wiawo' Policies abella be cespl.oed. ConeilNoa Sequel "Armed .... Ant the [quest !Nor 19 Arelliss gaits per sere lratead Not 11 wbicb would put bla into s Iwer nrls.atioe corns'. City Clark Autbolet read the title oT Rosalatios go. 95 -115. b C C STAFF REPORT V DATE: December 4, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRAY: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner rr�ll 19: SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AME11DMENT 85-048 &- FbRL3A T request tc amend the Gene ani —T�d use a MW Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) to Office (in conjunction with the development of a senior, citizen congregate living and care facility) on 4.85 acres of land, located on the south side of Foothill 3oulevard, west side of Cucamonga Creek, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 203- 211 -20, 21. ENVIROiItENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELGPMENT DISTRICT APEF6iE4 - PORLSA 7--X-request to amenu t e beve opoent D str cts Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 do /ac) to Office /Professional (in conjunction with the developnent of a senior citizen congregate living and care facility) on 4.95 acres of land, lxated on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west side of Cucamonga Creek, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208 - 211 -20, 21. I. BACKGROUND: At the November 20, 1985 meeting, the City Council expre support of the proposed senior housing project (CUP 85- 25) subject to a Develupment Agreement. Staff was directed to review alteniatsves for processing of the four (4) related applications (General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and a Development Agreement). Review of the ConCitltnai Use Permit application and Development Agreement by the Planning Commission will take approximately three (3) uwnths. The applicant has been provided a list of Items necessary to complete the Fermat CIP application (see attached letter). Assuming the infonmat :nn an be provided by next week, the project will be scheduled tar Technical and Design Review Committee meetings in January and the Planning Commission review by the February 26th meeting. Given this time frame, the most likely City Council meeting would be March 19, 1986. This schedule assumes no major changes to the project and timely response by the applicant to provide revised plans or other information. D/ / CITY COMCIL STAFF RE - IT GPA 85 -048 - PORLSA & .OA 85 -07 PORLSA December 4, 1985 Page 2 The Develops :t District Amendment, Development Agreement, and Cunditional Use Permit application should be processed concurren;.iy. With respect to the General Plan Amendment, the Council has the option of approving it at this time or processing it with the other applications. Either way will not affect the ultimate approval date of the project. Procedurally, concurrent review of all related applications is best to allow complete review of the project prior to granting any approval. Also, in the event the CUP application is withdrawn, a General Plan Amendment back to Medium Residential would not be necessary. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the public hearings for the su ect enera Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment be continued to the March 19, 1946 City Council meeting to allow concurrent processing of all related applications. R ectfull bmi d, Brad Bu er't� City Planner Correspondence to Applicant Concerning Conditional Use Permit Applicatlor November 20, 1985 City Council Staff Report �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ... Joy D ,Ina. Chu" 1. ll v 11 hm"RInA on Alchud5L0S1iI t4ueb1.mlghi August 30, 1985 R. Micheal Simpson R. L 'impson 6 Associates 17291 Irvine Boulevard, Su4te 405 Tustin, California 92680 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - CUP 85 -25 Dear Mr. Simpson: Thank you for submitting the abo.e referenced project to the City fcr review. Your project has been reviewed for completeness and accuracy for fili•ig, and as a result this review, your project has been found to be incomplete fnr processing. The following is a list of additional information needed prior to finding the application ctAplete. I. Site Utilization Mao: The proposed project should ba overla)ed on the site and thr correct development district should be shown an the adjacent vacant parcels. 2 Site Plan: A summary development table shuuld be p 1vT eT. The proposed driveway on Foothill Blvd. should a with the one on the north side. The proposed on- s circulation with the dropped off location and fire tanm access is inefficient. Staff is suggesting a looped driveway for this project. Any proposed curb, gutters and sidewalk including these across the street should be shown. 3. Graading Plan: The grading plan has too small of a scale To be reTed. Cross sections of all site boundaries, a rorth -south cross section, and an east -west cross section of the entire site should be provided. Attached for your review is a Copy of some guidelines in providing the required information on the grading plan. 4. Elevation: The height of all the elevations should be pro— vildid—on the plans. Further, the sit(. is rithin the Foothill Corridor Study and is subject to the Interim Policy 016 requires that the architecture be sensitive to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga with deslgn elements such as; river rock /field -stone walls, exposed beam work, bind arbors. covered walkways, or curvilinear gables. 732011ASELLN7C ROAD. 54FFE C • POS° OFFICE BON 807 - RANCHO CUCAMO \CA. CALIFOILMA 91rh^ • j710939•Ir31 R. Micheal Simpson, l f CUP 85 -25 l August 30, 1985 Page 2 S. The site is impacted by road noise frtm Foothill Blvd., therefore, a Noise Study is required and to be submitted for review of compl.teness prior to the scheduling for Planning Commission. Attached for your review are submittal requirements for a Noise Study. 6. The site is within a fault zone, therefore, a geologic study is required aid to be submitted for review of cempleten_ss prior to scheduling for Planning Commission. Based on the oreliminary Staff review of the project, the following issues have been identified and need to be addressed prior to scheduling for Design and Technical Review. 1. Land Use: The Planning Commission had made use eterm nation that senior Congregate Living Facility is Conditionally allowed in an Office /Professional Development District provided that they meet the follrwing criteria: A. Adequate surrounding uses for recreatia.al facilities. B. Close and convenient support shopping and office use. C. Location and proximity to a public transportation corridor. D. Compatible surrounding neighborhood envirnrnent. 2. Relationshi to thill Blvd. Corridor Stud : The site s u s n s stu Foo y area and is subjected to the Interim Policies where the Planning Commission shall conduct a Preliminary Review to determine consistency with the interim goal and policies of the Foothill Corridor Study. The intent is to provide direction to the applicant and Staff early in the review process and avoid undue time delays or expenditures. Prior to scheduling for Planning Conn'.ssion Preliminary Review on this project, revised plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division. 1;/7 R. Micheal Simpson C CUP 85 -25 \ August 30, 11985 Page 3 Further processing of this project cannot begin until the above additional Information is submitted, and the application is accepted as compute. If you need further assistance, the City wilt be happy to discuss with you the issues that have been identified In your project. Should you have VW questions regarding the review process, please feel free to contact me at anytime. Sincerely, COMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OEPAMENT PLANNI�nO OIYISIO:L ` Nancy Fur. t Assistant Planner NF:ko Attachments: Gradfng Plan submittal requirement Noise Study submittal requirement 4 9.. f C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MGWGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mover.er 20, 1935 TD: Mayor =d Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BT: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENY'ROM MiA1 ASSESSMENT AND f£NERAL_PLAN AMEN04ENT 85443 - nmuuA - A request to amend a Weral Plan Land Use j5FTr`an Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) to office (in conjunction with the development of a senior citizen congregate living and care facility) on 4.85 acres of land, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, rest side of Cucanronga Creek, west of vineyard Avenue - APR 208 - 211 -20, 21. MIRONIEMTAL ASSESSMENT MO MWWPOM DISTRICT request to menoTie e opoen s cts I freal Medium Residential (8-14 du /ac) to Office/Professional (in cottunctinn with the development of a senior citizen congregate living and care facility) on 4.58 acres of land, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west side of Cucamonga Creek, west of vineyard Avenue - APR 208 -Z1: ?0, 21. I. B=Gtom: The Planning Cvmission held a public hearing on q '3VO eY615 1985, to consider the above described items and recmended denial. The specific purpore of the larA use change is to allow construction of a senior citizen congregate living facility and convalescent hospital as Permitted under the Office /Prcfesysonal District regulations. The attached Planning Commission Steff Reports provide detailed infm=ation relative to the Land Use Awwdment and proposed project. II. PLAX41 LOMNIS JON ACTION• Planning Comission review of the proposa oas on —Tie suitability of tke site for senior citizens. The Cc=iss4on felt that development of a senior citizen Project on the site Is premature, and that ceamerctal and service uses were not within safe walking distance, since cc nercial land to the east is vaceat and no sidewalks exist. Vehicle access to the site by senior citizens was also stated to be a major concern based nn potential conflicts created by heavy cross traffic., litited v'sibllity to the ►Yst, and the high traffic speed on that Portion of Fcotinili Boulevard. Planning Commission minutes from the September 25, 1985 meeting are provided for your review. MMA CITY COUNCIL STAFF °ORT 85 \ GPA -048 and DDA a -07 - PORLSA Noveceer 20, 1985 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recouaends denial of the enerral— Plan- cendment and Development District Amendment. If the City Council concurs, adoption of the attachea General Plan Amendment Resolution of Denial and denial of the Development District Amendment by minute action would be appropriate. Respectfully Itto f B, ad Buller City Planner BB:CJ:ns Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Reports, September 25, 1985 Planning Commission Minutes, September 25, 1985 Correspondence from Applicant Affidavits of Mailing City Council Resolution of Denial 1 c CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ti DATE: September 25, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director 8' Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-048 vdn�_ - 4 request to amen t e enera rn an Us,. ZP arm Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) to Office /professional (in conjunction with the development of senior citizen congregate living and convalescent care facility) on 4.85 acres of land, located on the south side r,f °oothill Boulevard, west side of Cucamonga Creek, west of 6ineyard Avenue - APN 208 - 211 -20, 21. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 7WcN t - - r men equest to a e Tleve i.'pment ;tr :ts Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to Office /Professional (in conjunction with the development of a senior citizen congregate living and crnvalescent care facility) on 4.85 acres of laud, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west side of Cucaromga Creek, west of Vineyard A-,enue 21. - APN 208- 211 -20, Related File: Preliminary Review for CUP 85 -25 ABSTRACT: A General Plan Land Use Amendment and Development str ct Amendment is requested from Medium Residential to Office /Professional on a 4.85 acre site as described ibave. The specific purpose of the land use change is to allow construction of a senior citizen congregate living facil4•y (i.e. hotel) and convalescent hospital as permitted under tale office /professional District regulations. Since the project is io.at>d on Foothill isualsoron this agenda andreview hou dfor bethe consideredreoncurrently. 2At the August 28, 1985 meeting, the Planning Caomission required Alsotincludedaisian�analysisoof the amenpdmentstas In the report. the General Plan. Development Code and suitabi.s a of the site for seniors for Commission consideration of the amrnity of. ITEMS H/I a' .p PLANNING C0i64Isslo" ST•F RZPJRT ENVIRaft4ENTAL ASSESSM .i & GPA 85 -Ov - PORLSA September 25, 1985 Page 2 II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Action Rnuest�ed: Amendment of the General Plan Land Use Map an Devd elopment Districts Map from Medium Residential to Office / ?,ofessicnal. 8. PuMoossee: Development of a 112 -unit senior citizen congregate livfng facility and 60 -bed convalescent care facility. C. Location: South side of Foothill Boulevard, adjacent to uZ� camonga Creek. 0. Parcel Size: 4.85 acres. E. Existing Zoning•. Medium Residential (8 -14 de /ac). F. Existing Land Use: Vacate — G. S-irrocnding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, real estate office, designated Office /Professional. South - San Bernardino County Labor Association Housing, designated Medium Residential (8 -14 Ju /,c). East - Cucamonga Creek, historic house, vacant, designated Fl000 Control and General Commercial. Nest - Mobilc . home park, designated Low Medium Residential (4-8 du /ac). H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). North - Office. Somith - Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). East - Flood Control, Caarv_rcial. West - Low Medium Residential (4-8 du /ac). I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes gently to thu south with no unique land Terms. Vegetation is limited to Indigenous weeds and number of trees scatte-ed throughout the site and along the south boundary. III. ANALYSIS: A. General Plan Consi�sten56 The General Plan states that the nten� t ot—the f0 fice no Jse category is to prevent the proliferation of individu,l isolated offices. Rather, PLAMIM C0+elIS5I0.Y 'r FF REPORT t E1IVIROVIENIX ASSESS*-1T 1. 6PA 85408 - PORLSA September 25, 1985 Page 3 intergrated coopleres stroll be encouraged to provide areas where related and support office uses can be located. In addition, a land use objective of the General Plan is to restrict intensive uses and activities in areas where natural and /or mac -eade hazards may threaten life, prcperty. or sense of well- being. Considering that the site is -early five (5) acres and office vwl commercial property r; to -ated to the north and east, it ",pears that this site could not he constrnec as Isolated. Regarding potential hazards, the site is located in the Red Hill Fault Zone. A complete fault investigation will be prepared prior to commission consideration of the CUP and any hazards will be mitigated to the extent possible, including relocating or redesigning the buildings. In addition, office development on the property would increase the voUnme of traffic generated by the site and thus add to potential circulation conflicts. Combined access with adjoining property Is not practical shoo a mobile home part is located to the west and Cucamonga Channel creates a barrier to the east. Traffic impacts are discussr1 further under the Fmtromaental section of this report. B. Ml ent Code Provisions:_ An objective of the Development Ts to promote am encourage office and con ercial locations and designs to be convr Aently accessible by bicycle aM foot, as well as by automobile. In additon, the Development Code states that site development regulations and performance standards are designed to mate office uses relatively compatible with residential uses. The proposed land use change from HWIun Residential to Office is proposed to accacodate a senior citizen congregate living facility (i.e. hotel) and convalescent hospital. Earlier this year, the commission determined that such uses are appropriate in the Office/Professional District. A fall description of the proposal is provided in the preliminary review staff report for CUP 85-25. The benefit of tae Office/Professional versus Medium Residential (844 du /ac) is that the number of units is determined through the Desiga/Technical Review process. The 112 -unit congregate living facility on approximately 3.85 acres of the site has a density of 29 units per acre `see Exhibit `8•). 7h a convalescent hospital an the remaining acre at the south end of the property would have 60 beds. If the proposed senior project was not constructed, other uses in the Office/Professional District which could be developed include offices, financial services, medical services, health club, automotive sates, restaurant and bars, fast -food restaurants, and hotels. a.--)-3 PLANNING COMMISSION y"FF REPORT ENVIRONMEfRAL ASSESS nT & GPA 85 -048 - PORLSA Septenber 25, 1985 Page 4 C. Suitability off the Site for Seniors: To determine if the site s a equate d uateTor he propos sen or project, a review of the tocational criteria contained within the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) is useful. The Overlay District, however, will not be used in this case since It applies only to projects targeted for low and moderate income senior citizens and when development incentives /subsidies are requested. Ad acent Land Uses /C2r2atibility: Land uses to the immediate v c n ty of a sea or nousing project must be free of health, safety, or noise problems. the proposed project should be compatible with the mobile home park to the west and farm labor camp to the south. Also, noise levels along Foothill Blvd. will require mitigation through project design. Public r ;rnvements: Public improvements such as sidewalks saY -d tune:' -the site with surrounding shopping, service, and recreation uses; however, land to the east is vacant without full street improvements. In addition, crosswalks at the Intersection of Foothill and Vineyard are not yet provided. Site Tofo ra hy: The topography of the site is fairly level M ead stly traversed by persons of limited mobility. Proxtmit of Commercial /Services: When property to the east are north s cevelop-,d asplanned, the site will be within easy walking distance to offices, commercial estdblfshments and services. San Antonio Community Hosptial ant surrounding medical offices are located to the west approximately 1 1/2 to 2 miles. In addition, public transit stops are available along Foothill Blvd. Ilo• ever, the site does have short term disadvantages since the commercial property to the east is vacant and lacks full street Improvements, thus inhibiting pedestrian access to services. 0. Environmental Assessment: As discussed in the August 28, 1985 a epor ca — has identified three potential environmental concerns to the areas of geology, noise levels and circulation. Regarding geology, the site is located within the Red Hill Fault Zone which requires a detailed study in accordance with the Alquist- Priolo Act Noise levels at the site along Foothill Boulevard will exceed 70 CNEL, and an accoustical analysis and sound attenuation for interior and exterior areas will be required. Both of these studies will be accomplished during the Design /Technical Review process. Regarding traffic and circulation, the applicant prepared a brief study to review and traffic impacts of the proposed �� Y- PLANNING COMMISSION !r FF REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSRLnT & GPA 85 -048 - PORLSA September 25, 1985 Page 5 senior project as well as residential and office development on the site. In summary, the study indicates that the proposed senior project would generate slightly less traffic than a multi- family project at 14 -units per acre (400 versus 450 vehicles per day). If th site is developed as offices, the amount of traffic would more than double that of a multi - family project (1180 vehicles per day). According to the City Traffic Engineer, vehicle trips generated by office development would create short term traffic conflicts near the entry to the site. After construction of the median island, traffic impacts would result at the intersections of Foothill at Vineyard and Baker caused by additional U -turns of vehicles traveling to and from the site. E. Development A reement: If the Commission is supportive of the senior e: , but concerned with the proposed Office /Professional zoning, a development agreement could be required. Such a document could allow development of the senior project only under the Office zoning. In the event the project is not constructed, the property would be changed back to Medium Residential. The advantages of a development agreement for the City would je to allow the senior project as designed, but assure t',at another project which might be incempatibile with the surrounding area or create substantial traffic conflicts neild not be developed. Processing of a development agreement requires City Council aporoval, so action on the Land Use Amendments would have to be deferred to allow concurreit processing of the agreement and CUP application. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Prior to approvai of t',e lanJ use appR ations, t�Cmmission must find that the proposed district changes are in conformance with the General Plan, and that the subject property is suitable for the uses permutee in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and cripatibility with surrounding land uses. in addition, the Commis• ion must make the following findings: a) That the subject property is suitable for t.ie uses permitted in tie proposed district in terms of arcess, size and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and aa.s PLANNING C04MISSIOM WSj-'7 REPORT ! ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM.f G GPA 85 -0 11 - P(RLSA September 25, 1985 Page 5 h) The Amendments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan or Development Code; and c) The Amendments p' me the goals of the Land Use Element; and d) The Amendmerts would not be materially injurious or detrimental :o the adjacent properties. V. CORRESPONOCNCE: Th15 item has been advertised as a public heartny ni —YFi —e 6�T—he ort newspaper, the property posted (4'x 8' sign) sit not ces were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission cons er a material and input regarding the Land Use Amendment and proposed project. If the Commission concurs with the findings, adoption of the attached Resolutions recommending approval to the City Council of the Amendments and issuance of Negative Declarations would be appropriate. If the Commission determines that a de:elopment agreement is appropriate, the public hearing should be re- advertised to allow concurrent processing or the agreement and CUP application. Rei e tic , Jack Lam, AICP Director of Community Development JL:CJ:ko attachments: Exhibit °P• - Location Map Exhibit •8' - Proposed Site Plan Correspondence from Applicant Initial Study, Part 11 and Addendum General Plan Amendment Resolution of Approval Development District Amendment Resolution of Approval C C 1� ! .ado i y .QP .GG PA?OFffS�'/'�A1.1 � Pd><cSvHm 1 r � I .r vB ✓CCT . r?.QOPC27}/ knA.ffC Lk�A.r.6L /�oR.4M kaao r�N.re_et f Cevma� / / cv�.wft. ✓9cnf% mss tName !.➢act Ce vv hl A WK YnBQ'JINC 8y9.741/i1G S'NtY//1C/ VgGgn,'T • ""' •zNtc Jinn flefi __-------- ------ -_.__i— _.... V �)OR� CITY OF rrEna, _&VA as -x1295 + a� PLANNING DPAS[OlN EXHIBM Lei SCAM — G�a-7 1 nikl fly, n: ill r A - -I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISM -= n'E,u ��4Bs -o'�B� DD�6s- -o7 Tnu, i�titN EXHIBIT A&_ SCAIFs i I l C t :f CITY OF RA -NCHO CCC UIO\GA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 25, 1985 er. TD: Chairman and Members of the Planning Camfzsion FROM: Jack Loa, Coarannfty Development Director BY: Nancy Fang, Assistant Planner SUBJECT. PRELIMINARY FEYIE4 FOR CUP 8S -25 - PORLSA LIMITED _ h cons' determination etween the Goth rrldor Interim Policies and the proposed 114 -unit senior congregate living facilir; together with a CO -bed pre facility and other services= provided such as seals, trans"rtatldn, and housekeeping, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, ,1st side of Cucaonga Creek, west of Vineyard Avenue - APR 208- 21i -20, 21. Related File: General Plan Amend:ent 85-068 and Development District Amendment 85 -07. 1. ABSTRACT: The Purpose of this report is for the Planning MiW szioi to determine the consistency of this proposed project with the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies. II. BACkGR0UN9- A�ueneraF: Related to this project is the request for a General l duRsials ic��ct Meimedential District to 0ffice/ProfsionalOfs:ri which will also be considered by the Planning Ccsission tonight. The purpose Of this Proposed land use change is to allow the construction of a seniors congregate living facility and convalescent care facility. Earlier in the year, the Planning Commission cede a use determination that a seniors congregate living facility is conditionally permitted in the Office /Professional District on a case by case basis. Also, the convalescent care facility is conditionally permitted under the Office /Professional District regulations. Since the proposed project Is located on Foothill Boulevard, the Planning Co®itsion will have to review the project and determine its ccnsistency with the approved Interim Policies. B. Pro ect Dfscriotion• The proposed project consists of two ('L) two -story Build ni gs -where 114 units for the senior congregate living facility is located to the front portion of the site while a 60 -bed convalescent facility is located to the rear portion of the site. Open space area and recreation facilities PLA!VW1G CJ.c:4ISS!0'1 STAFF REPORT �y9 PRELIMINARY REVIEA FOR Cu? 85 -25 - PORL`A Q September 25, 1985 Page 2 i are concentrated within a large interior courtyard for the congregate living facility. The service area, the dining room. and the reception area are orientated towards Foothill Boulevard. The main access for this project is through Foothill Boulevard with an emergency access located towards the eastern side of the property boundary. The number of parking spaces provided is 74 spaces. The senior congregate living facility provides housing for seniors that are 55 years or older and Are independent ano can WeraLe on their own. Other services provided for these residents will be meals, housekeeping, and '- aasportat!on. Also, an on -site manager will be provided 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week. The convales^ent facility prnwides housing for seniors who require sup:rvision or light care and who cannot live independently. This facility will be under separate management and control as well as owned by a separate entity. II: ANALYSIS: On August 28, 1585, the Planning Commission approved nterim olicles for Foothill Corridor with an overall goal: To establish a high quality, attractise, and un.fying design lmaga reflective of coamnity heritage, and provide a viatle setting for a balanced mixture of residential s,d commercial activities with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access. analysis addresses consistency of this pmLest with the Pt_ -im Pe lets se A. Land Use /Site Plan: According to the Policies, all land use and development yroposals shall be coapatible with ultimate uses on surrounding properties, particularly residential uses, and mitigate potential conflicts to the extent practical. Mitigation measures may typically include, but are not lim!ted to, Master Planning, transition of building height, architectural form and density, landscape buffers, soand attenuation, reduction of Rind turbulence, visual barriers and /or grading conditions to disrupt line -of -sight concerns, and alternative circulation and access. The Area west of the site is an existing mobile home park. South of the site is a housing camp for a Labor Association. East of the site _ Is Cucamonga Creek with vacant land designated for future ummerclal use. Therefore, the proposed use is campatible to the surrounding uses. However, it is critical to require a development agreement that stipulates the land use will revert back to Medium Residential if the project is not built. If the land use designation for the site 1s changed from Meth Residential District to Office /Professional District, the site pl��- ' should be designed to provide a setback of 100 feet from the west and the south property boundary for any proposed two -story buildings., ,. The service area / delivery area should be relocated away from public '& ?LAbnnG_CO"4l5'jiON STAFF REPORT PgELIMINAR' aE'I.EA FOR CUP 85 -25 - PORLSA Seotember 25, 1955 Page 1 view atyng Foothill Boulevard. The drop off location is ine'fic',ent and cvkW teat^_ traffic hazard The r,!a,on is that drivers may oe on the wrong side of the lane as well as no turn around lane far the driver Staff design slay resolve sthe ow site to culationiproblem that a Loop street B. Architecture- The ro os4 architecture must be sens i Give to the erita e o andho ucamonaa,, he P,'3DOZ a eva[ do s o two -story oi soion stye cur tectme with terra cotta barrel the roofing., canvas window awnings and erterior plaster The iuilding design appears repetitive and rigid with its avt:nate roof height pattern on the smith, east and west side,. overall, the proposed elevations do not provide the rEcessary desi5;1 elements such as: river ,rock /fieldztoe walls, ax-nosed .,or,,wirk, vine arbors, curved parapet ,wills, and covered walkways or arcades. C. Pedestrian erientationiruu„" ••a•�••. ...- adecmat! oedestr art cannecti"rs and ve icu ar c1r- ai or e ere Oper s oa prov a btrar er p -Sestr an conic E ohs to future cownrcial and service areas nn Foothill. According to the developer, most of the Deocstrian amenities are lea within the large courtyard for security and privacy Purposes transit facilities such s bus ostopshfordthe site consider andse. Public D. Streetscaoe /Lagdscedlna: The proposal conceptual landscaping Plan shoo incorporate such design elen, nts as lntensifydngclandscaping. rockscape. and loandsc Pingdshou>¢ibe,deslgned to createtvisual interest and variety to the automobiles, building architecture d buffer screen utility and service area and distinguish Pedestrian spaces from vehicular area IV. pap N�Tro }ect Staff and make e� onsistencyhdeterminatlon, If dtheePlann Planning Commission determines ttat the Proposed project 1z consistent with the Committee. theA tthe plans lanning Gvhcissione deter-nines the that0 the nproposed is not work with with the revisingctft tile be Reso$ctful ly submitted, 'Gcmmuntty phvelnPment Director JLC11F :ko ( Attachments' Exhibit 'A' - Location Map Exhibit 'B' - Sit,- Utilization Nap Exhibit 'C' - Site Plan Exhibit 'D' - Elevations Foothill Corridor Interim Poi :ans �D3/ v rX)xTx CITY OF ,rE��, PP�GM me nr -?5- RANCHO CUCANIONCA ?LANNwr, DIVIMl E7tFlffi ALE, . -: <.T. s. �—_.> V � �. �•.:" rf " ". � , v _ 97. tv`r�.i� r,� )?1y s„ � ! / JIj +.1� 'h I Ki•.Y. T r� '� 1''!�.t �Y`h 1.. •,�.. Pc:. "!ter � °.4"�l"+r.T ' ��� 71 -.�j ^.tar... 7. i.+ =."r �` y�.�:. ,,,s a��•�� ^,- - : =wR E ol NW �l CITY OF RANCHO CL;CAiMO \GA n A'N,NL \G DINrMN i 1 11 c= � no1RH &ta -� Trru, oi0 i E \HAIRS SG11E,__.�/' a3� " Ply�M E ol NW �l CITY OF RANCHO CL;CAiMO \GA n A'N,NL \G DINrMN i 1 11 c= � no1RH &ta -� Trru, oi0 i E \HAIRS SG11E,__.�/' a3� C eC-'aY.4MIR 0 A93T_M¢4V6M =EMV MWSM NCPT ELEVAnaV ELOER_Y NOUSINO SOUM ELEVATION CITY OF rrEms 1 f G RANCHO CUCAMONGA F���yro���r E�A� `. PLANNING DIVLSIQV EXNtUfi a3ls- act 4 TENDED CARE FACAITY NORTH ELEVATON • SOUTN EIEYATON SIlA EXTENDED CARE FACLITY WEST ELMATON Aix C I _ EXTENOEO CARE FACRIfY EAST EL� \j M). Tr1 CITY OF rrFM, 1 ik /_/,�1 RANCHO CUCAMG.NGA 7TIU, <c_,�AnA•� _ PLANNING DIVOON crux m. ^ l7_ Owl Mr. Lam advised that the Cammlaaian would not be foreclosing the option if (L they asked the property owner on the south to provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for half of the strret. Further, that if and when the property to the north is developed the opportunity would still be there to take a look at what dedication issue might be necessary for that property. Motion: Noveu by Rempel, seconded by Barker, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 8318, with amendvents to require landscaping and meandering sidewalk on Haven Avenue consistent with the east side of Haven Avenue, an irrevocable offer of dedication for one -half of Acacia Street, and sidewalk construction an 7th Street deferred until time of development. Nation carried by the following vote: AYES: COK41SSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CO.YMISSIONERS: NONE - carried • � s s Chairman Stout announced that the following Items and item •Q" were related. Therefore, item 'Q• would be heard out of regular order, concurrently with the following amenament request: H. ENVIROtImENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -048 _ PORLSA - A request to amenu t e IIIII, ara an an Uze Amp ram ed am es eat a (4- citizen du /ac) to Office (in conjunction with the development of a senior citizen congregate living and care facility) on 4.85 acres of land located on the south side of Foothill Blvd, west side of Cucamonga Creek, west of Vineyard Avenue - ARM 209 - 211 -20 & 21. I. ENVIROMMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 85 -07 - PORLSA 1111 1' (8 -14 du/ac) t to Office /Professional (in tconju conjunction 00 Me:!the development of a senior citizen congregate living and care facility) on a de acres of land, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west side of Cucamonga Creek, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 2208- 211 -20, 21. Q. PRELIMINARY REVIEW FOR CUP 85 -25 _ POF.LSA - A consistency determination yen t e rootn rr or nter m o ties and the proposed 112 unit senior congregate living facility together with a 50 bed care facility and provided hi t housekeeping, at the south side of Foothill Boulevard,west of Cucamongarek and west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207- 211 -20 and 21. Related File: GPA 85 -043; BOA 85 -07. Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report relative to the General Plan and Development District Amendment. Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report preliminary review for CUP 85 -25. relative to Plan^ ng Commission Minutes -7- September 25, 1985 OIZ3 / Commissioner McNiel asked staff if information was available from Caltrans �- regarding a signal at Baker and Foothill. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, replied that at this time a signal has not been scheduled for installatiun at this location; however. if a project was approved for Baker and Foothill it would be necessary for Caltrans to place that signal on its priority list. Commissioner Rempel asked if staff had information from Caltrans regarding the median island on Foothill. i' Rougeau replied that the concept of a median has been approved by Caltrans, but that further study is underway to determine where the median breaks should be located. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Rick Andrews, representing the applicant, gave an overview of the project. Kenneth Grimes gave an overview of the architecture. Chairman Stout advised that the Planning Commission had recently completed a study of Foothill Boulevard and forwarded Interim Policies to the City Council for its approval. He asked the applicant if they had reviewed these policies with respect to architecture. Mr. Grimes relied that he had obtained a copy of the Interim Policies; r however, the criteria had not been utilized as the pruject design was - ccmpleted 4 -5 months ago. Chairman Stout referred to the Interim Policies section which requires applicants to make a statement of how a proposed project's architecture can conform with the desired theme for Foothill Boulevard. He asked If this would be realistic for this type of project. Mr. Grimes replied that he would like to have more specific information on the goals of this reiiuirement and hoped that this would be possible during review of the CUP There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker stated that one of the primary considerations for senior citizen projects is the proximity to services that senior citizens need; however, there are no services within We walking distance to this project. Commissioner McNiel disagreed and stated that van service is not an uncommon method of transportation for senior project. He felt it was not a bad location because it 1s buffered by surrounding development. L"� Planning Commission Minutes -8- September 2S, 198S �' `— 2-3�s Commissioner Chitiea was concerned that the senior citizens would n,t be able to walk service.toShe support tated thatsitnisnotstobsay that drive or rely on van be appropriate In the future, but the project at this time is premature. within walking distance of eventually project and agreed that the be oction provided psse for �f this se u that t y be oible for solvethe technical issue and advised that ae e3re s in addition to Foothill Boulevard was necessary. Commissioner Rempel was concerned with the driveway location on Foothill, and stated that another driveway should not be located on Foothill until the medisn oldr He further issues all with the project could be the traffic issue faroutweighsa others. Chair-nan that b these ern se the emed the Commission would be t deny thireq est. He asked t City Attorney to clarify the appropriate action. Andrew y Denial had not b s been submitted submit for Commission sionca Resolution consideration, theappropriate action would be to direct staff to prepare a Restitution recommending denial and place it on the consent calendar of the next agenda. Further, that it would then be at the applicant*s discretion if he wanted to withdraw his Conditional Use Permit application. Potion: moved by Barker, seconded by Chitiea, to direct staff to prepare a Amendment 8S .04B, Porisa tie Motion fcarried by d General Plan the fallowing vote: AYES: comISSIONERS: BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, RENPEL, STOUT NOES: CoriMISStONERS: NONE ABSENT: CO`41SSIONERS: NONE - carrieA Resolutionorecom by a ding edenialo of seconded by oAssessment staff andiDevelopment District Amendment 8507, Porlsa. lotion carried by the following vote: AYES: nu:S: ABSENT: s• :�: CO?BISSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEL, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT COK41SSIONERS: NONE CCA41SSIONERS: NONE Planning Commission Minutes -9- - carried September 25, 1995 C C t ; September 25, 1985 Mr. Otto Rroutil, Senior Planner CITY OF AfrFBBFt Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, G 91730 Res PORLSA, LIMITED Project Dear Mr. Rroutil: The Project pioposal consists of two (2) facilites. One complex will consist of a two (2) story, one - hundred and fourteen (114) Onit Ederly congregate living facility, and the other, a two (2) ' story sixty room intermediate care facility /convalescent home. The congregate living facility will be full service Retirement Apartments for active Elderly Adults. The residents must be ambulatory and able to function independently. Based on our past experience, the majority of oar tenants will have family within a 15 mile radius of the facility. The average age of these residents will be between 75 and 84 years old. The building, bas beea designed to include 114 livrag units with private bath and kitchen. The kitchen is designed to include a two- burner hotplate and refrigerator so that the tenants can, on occasion, entertain in their room. The facility will also have a central dining room, central kitchen, lom:ges, library, beauty Sshop, private laundry facility, and a craftroom. These apartments be staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days a w±ek. Staff wiz, prepare at least 2 meals a day, and provide activity programs, and a van for transportation of the residents. The van will be used to carry tenants for daily shopping trips, outings, doctor office visits, and any other trips required for the con7anience of the residents. The staff will also do laundry, weekly changing of linens, daily trash service, cleaning of the individual units and other duties for the convenience and comfort of the residents. C � Sep O�tI.Outil, Senior Planner �± Page 2 We expect that •fie facility will be fully encinkled, as well as, have smoke that the a and fire alarm syftem. All units will have an emergency call system which is monitored by the sated PC*Iect i staff- aim a Pau cord will be located en the If a resident has a problem, each unit from sibich an ener9gnDAit. bedsore and the bathroom elz in the Office and U:I a can be sent to the —.n'* to Tae �l.�yee who is monitoring that ,e emergency, and respond _,,ling for help, such as the paramedics, or two -way speaker system to confirm the tenant's L, -- — directly to that tenant's sons if they're merely by respond problem immediately. capable of bundling the P We will not have any medical personnel on oar upervisinn. do Tbe t house any residents who require medical care own, such as dress, residents most be able to functionmoaals. °and participate In bath, come to the dining too° for activi.•.ies. In the 'vent that a resident can no longer e independent. we will work with their family to find the Proper facility where the resident can receive the necessary tare . on the rear portion of the site, an imately 1 acre pbceel, approx t silty (60) room intermediate care facility is proposed pe be sixty (60) r This facility would be for those elderly persons who require intermediate care and SuPervialoA. Generally, this is in the realm of special diet and /oc regular medical attentions however. generally, intersedia i care tenants are ambulatory and somewhat able to be respoagible for their own lives. The primary difference would. be that the car facility would be staffed ' by differed medical PeraOusel. The facility would also have it's own fully equipped titer$° for food firer -Iration and special diets as needed by the tenants. Also' medicatiou would likely be on hand needed the site in order administer to tte tenant's needs. construction end subsequent operation Of this facility zperwna[dof The ccomplis a separate enie from the omen and op$ th accomplished by At present, Western Medical y- Association the congregate (desire own and operate that facility. has expressed a desire to _ Medical Association has iextensive vicexpe Hence in oeeontractobas senior housing and hose ver, .oar are been concluded with Western Medical and ne9 continuing. t - C C Mr. Otto Krtutil, Senior Planner September 2:0 1985 Page 3 Finally, I would like to address some concerns we had regarding the traffic study and recommendation, that were submitted to the City. We would like to emphasize the fzct that raw data for projects of the nature contemplated in out proposal are not available, a:d Mr. Kimmel indicated this in his report. He, therefore, used a •retirement community as the basis Ior his traffic study, since that was the cicsest hard information that he could obtain. Also, he noted that the information was derived from the San Francisco are... As you are no doubt aware, a 'retirement community generally contains single - family, apartment, condominium, and congregate type uses all in a large project area. Such communities will generate much more traffic than would be generated by the use completated in our proposal. In discussions with our proposed management company, it was pointed out by the management company that truffir is very light for this type of project. In futher discussions with the on. -sight managers and the mangement company it was determined that traffic, even during peak periods of advartisement for rent -up purposes, is generally less than 200 persons per day. Deliveries and service calls gonerally occur between a.m. and 10:00 a.m. and, on the average, occur three days a week. In nt, typical project with 117 units, twelve o! the tenants had their ow: cars and used these cars onto a week on the average. The mac 'ty of the tenants use the bus line and the project van as their mains of transportation. Regarding bus usage, it was the consensus thtt the vast majority of use is of the Dial -A -Aide service. A typical lroject of 117 units would have a total of 58 spices for parking including guest spaces. Even with such a limited number of parking spaces provided the management personnel have indicated that they have never experienced any stacking of cars entering or exiting the project site. The above inftrmati" was derived from discussions with the proposed management co.apany regarding five projects located in tha Orange Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Lastly, you will note in the traffic report, Mr. Kimmel has indicated that the peak traffic times for a project of this type are at the non -peak hours of the day for the street (i.e. mid- morning and mid - afternoon); and, therefore, even when traffic is peak at the lsite this will not significantly impact the traffic for �u, � r Mc.Otto Rtoutil, Senior Planning September 25. 1985 Page 4 C" Should ynu have any questions regarding this letter, please don't hssitate to contact me anytime. .inceceeQlry�,f�' Richard R. Andrews RRA #! /pb c. r �y� 1 F- CITY OF R"CHO CUCAMONGA % STAFF REPORT DAM March 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager s �/j FEW: Mark 2. Lorirr. Administrative Acelyst ,tM4, SUBJECT: The City Attorney has prepared the •tteebed Ordinance which ameads Sectiocs of the Municipal Code relating to the one and sale of safe and sane fireworks. As directed by the City Cwncil and proposed by the Fireworks Task Force, the four (4) primary ameadments to the Muninipal Code are as follows: 1. We of Fireworks - 22:00 Name. June 30 through 12:00 Midnight. July 5. 2. D+Ch.rae of Fir"arkg - 1t,Ol •.e . Ju2y 4 through 1200 Midnight. July 5. 3. 01e1011e ABA of pnrehegg - 18 years of age and older ailess a sumv. is accompanied by his or bar parent or guardian. 4. Sale of g*arklara - prohibits the sale, so* or disebarge of any sparkler. The above awadments have been wutlLmed on the attached Ordinance and have been identified nnaerirally. In addition, the City Attorney has included other provisions curb as penalty for violation, civil aexdies and a sevec.Mlity clause. Thew* additions are intended to provide cotyiate tat for these sections of the municipal code. Should you have any quesclaos regarding the amnudwmts to the '!reworks Ordinance, please contact we at your conven)ao-e. MBL /dja Attached avtl *Z ORDINANCE NO. 79 B AN ORr INANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 8.12.020, 8.12.030, 8.12.050.C., 8.12.190 IND ADDING SECTIO24S 8.12.200 AND 8.12.710 "O CHAPTER 8.12 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CCCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIREWORKS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 8.12.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga municipal C e s ereby amended to read, in words and figures. as follows: '4.12.020 Fireworks Defined. 'A. 'Dangerous fireworks' are those defined in Section 12.505 of the California Health an.1 Safety Code, as the same presently exists or may be amended from time to time- hereafter, and said dangarous fire­- works may not be discharged within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California as the same presently exists or as may be modified from time to time L.reafter, at any time. 'B. 'Safe and Sane Fireworks' are those defined in Section 12.504 of tic California Health and Safety Code, as the same presently exists or as may be amended from time to time hereafter. Safe and sane fireworks may be discharged within the corporate limits of tht City of Rancho Cucamonga during the period beginning at 12:01 a.m. on the fourth day of July and ending at 12:00 midnight on the fourth day of July of the same calendar year. 'C. 'Sparkler' includes any device contain- ing chemical elements and/or chemical compounds capable of burning independently of the oxygen of the atmou- ohere and may be comprised of, but not limited to, devices made of the following ingredients and having the fallowing capabilities: 'Barium nitrate, aluminum ponder (pyrotecbaic mixture), iron powder or fine qrits, resin, potassium perchlorate and adhered to wire or wood material and manufactured to burn at a controlled rate of speed.` -1- .�Sis M`3 Ordinance No. Page Two SECTION 2. Section 8.12.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal co' a a ereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "8.12 030 Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks Permitted. "A. The sale if safe and sane fireworks shall only be permitted in commercial districts of the City and such sale shall be subject to all applicable state laws and regulations and all conditions specified in this Chapter 8.12. "B. No person authorized to sell safe and sane fireworYs pursuant to this Chapter 8 12 shall sell any such fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, to a minor under the age of 18 years, unless such minx is accompanied by his or her parent(s) or guardian(a). ' I shall not commence prior to 12:00 noon of the thirtieth of June and shall terminate at 12:00 midnight on the fifth day of July of the same calendar year. "D. Notwit.standing any other provision of Fttaihe aw, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partner- ship or corporation to sell, use or discharge any parkler, as that tern is defined in this Chapter 8 12, n any location within the corporate boundaaies of City of Rancho Cucamonga." SECTION 3. Section 8 12 050 C of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal oC` Jeis Eiereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "C. period of coverage shall be 12:01 a m., June 30, or earlier, to 12:00 midnight July 15, or later, of the same calendar % ar:" SECTION 4. Section 8 12.190 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code rs— Hereby amended to read, .n wcrdo and figures, as follows: 08.12.19u Penalty for Violation of Chapter. "It shall be unlawful for any purson, firm, part- nership, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. -2- -) q Ord nance No. Page Three Any person, firm partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Chapter or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a mis- demeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars, or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each such person, firm, partner- ship, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter is eDmmitted, continued or permitteo by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed prnishable therefor an provided in this Chapter." SECTION S. A new Section 8.12.200 is hereby added to Chapter 8.I3-07 Title 8 of the rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: "Section 8.12.200. Civil Remedies Available. "A violation of any of the previsions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance +nd may be abated by the City through civil process by leans of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunc- tiin, or in any other manner prcvidnd by law for the abdtenent of such nuisance." SECTION 6. A new Section 8.12.210 is hereby added to Chapter 6.T2 oo�icle 0 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: "Section 8.12.210 Severabillty. "The City Council hereby declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Chapter be rendered or declared invalie by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remain- ing provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Chapter shall remain in full force and ,ifiect. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Or ndi ance.- -3- o_(/ 7 nrmv nn n e )dn[an ne rn a vnvn - STAFF REPORT- t��.�....�'� 0 DATE: March 20, 1986 tvn TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRAY: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HUNTER'S RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY OF FONTANA - City Count] review of an use alternatives or a Hunter's Ridge Specific. Plan on 567.6 acres of land within the City 'f Fontana, located on the north side of Summit Avenue, -ast of San Sevaine Creek, west of Devore Freeway. I. PACKGROUNO: The City of Fontana is in the process of preparing a pec c an (Hunter's Ridge) for the Hunt Club property recently annexed to Fontana. Following action by LAFCO removing the subject & property from Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence, a settlement agreement was approved 'between Rancho Cucamonga anJ Fontana which specifies that three land use alternatives will be presented to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and their comments will be c,iven "Yerlous consideration by the City of Fontana". Review of the alternatives was referred to the Planning Commission by the Council for their recommendations back in October 1985. After a delay requested by the City of Fontana, the Planning Commission reviewed the three latest alternatives at the February 26, 1986 meeting. The Commission stated that none of alternatives presented were acceptable and concurred with the analysis contained in the Staff Reports. Their comments are outlined in the following section of this report. In addition, Commission staff reports are attached which provide background information and analysis. II. PLANNING COMMISSION C01%NTS: In summary, the major Planning omn ss on concerns regar ng he alternatives are as follows: 1. The overall density of each alternative is high given site constraints and the rural character of the area; 2. The intensity of multi- family units along I -15 and commercial development as shown on Alternative Two will established an undesirable image and precedent for future development on surrounding properties; 3. 'Estate' lots are preferable along Summit Avenue and San Sevaine Creek to provide a transition to the half -acre lots south of the project site in Rancho Cucamonga and the potential regional park within San Sevaine wash; .1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan March 20, 1986 Page 2 4. The project design should consider site constraints and limitations presented by natural hazards such as slope stability, flooding, seismic conditions, wind turbulence, and wild land fire; S. Preservation and sensitivity to existing natural features, land forms, and historic features on the site should be considered, particularly in regard to grading and preservation of mature vegetation such as Eucalyptus trees; 6. Equestrian trails should be located adjacent to San Sevaine wash connecting Summit Avenue to the northern utility corridor; 1. East -west access north of 24th Strest, connecting the site to the west as established in the Vest valley Foothills Plan, should be reviewed; 8. Improvement cost directly related to the project, but within Rancho Cucamonga, must be provided by the developer and /or the City of Fontana. Major items include: improvement of Cherry Avenue beyond the 44 foot curb -to -curb width specified in the Etiwanda Specific Plan; improvement of Summit Avenue where it crosses San Sevaine wash; and flood control improvements at Summit Avenue and to the south resulting from realignment of the Hawker- Crawford Channel; 9. Maintenance provisions must be provided for landscaping and trails along the perimeter of the project, particularly on Summit Avenue; and 10. Alternatives One or Three, with incorporation of the above comments are least objectionable. III. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should review the proposed a tern ter aT and provide comments focusing on the impacts of the project relating to Rancho Cucamonga. Representatives from the ty of Fontana and the consultant firm preparing the document, The Planning Center, will be available at the meeting to provide prtsegyltion of the plan and respond to any questions. 88:Cd:ns Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - February 26, 1986 Planning Commission Staff Report - October 9, 1985 ,�k t19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 26, 1986 TO: Chairman and Hemters of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HUNTERS RIftiE SPECIFIC PiV - CITY OF FONTANA - Planning amm ss on rev ew o an use alternatives or the Hunters Ridge Spe:ific Plan on 567.6 acres of land within the City of Fontara, located an the north side of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek, west of the Devore Freeway. I. BACKGROUND: This item was referred to the Planning Commission by i e ty ouncil in October, 1985. Three preliminary land use alternatives were reviewed by the Commission; however, at that time the City of Fontana stated that the alternatives would be completely revised after further research and analysis. Please refer to the October 9, 1985, staff report and minutes for background information and discussion of major issues. The following sections of this report provide an overview of the previous Planning Commission comments, a description of the three new land use alternatives and analysis. Review of the alter atives focuses on impacts of the project as they relate to Rancho Cucamonga. II. PREVIOUS COHIENTS: At the Ocbber 9, 1985, meeting, the Commission sta that all three alternatives presented were unacceptable. However, the alternative shown on page 3 of this report was least objectionable, since it incorporated several characteristics impirtant to this City as follows: �50 ITEM I A PLALLMING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Hunters Ridge Specific Plan - City of Fontana February 26, 1986 Page 12 1. The total unit count of 1,705 dwellings reflected more sensitivity to surrounding land use and site constraints such as grading and flood control; 2. 'Estate' lots adjacent to Summit Avenue and San Sevaine Creek provide a transition to the half acre lots south of the project site in Rancho Cucamonga and the potential Regional Park along San Sevaine wash. 3. The circulation system provides for access to Duncan Canyon, rather than emphasizing Summit and Cherry Avenues; 4. No commercial zoning is prov "ed; and S. The mix of dwelling unit types (single - family versus multi - faaily), is core in tune with future development to the area. In addition to commenting on the alternatives, the Planning Commission provided the following general concerns: 1. Preservation and sensitivity to existing natural features, land forms, and historic features on the site, should be considered, particularly in regard to mature vegetation such as Eucalyptus trees and grading; 2. The project design should consider site constraints and limitations presented by natural hazards such as slope stability, flooding, seismic conditions, wind turbulence, and wild land fire; 3. East/West access north of 24th Street, connecting the site to the west as establishai in the West Valley Foothills Plan, should be reviewed; 4. The project design should integrate the future San Sevaine Creek Regional Park through appropriate orientation and land use transition; and S. Regional trail connections as outlined on the Citv's General Plan and West Valley Foothills Plan should be provided. Q51 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Hunters Ridge Specific Plan - City of Fontana February 26, 1986 Page f3 r� o.Yn, !4 M:1 Mf asp PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Hunters Ridge Specific Plan - City of Fontana Fe5ruary 26, 1986 Pale /4 II1. LARD USE ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives reviewed last October represented a range o design concepts with the number of units varying from 1,705 to 2,141 dwellings. In contrast, the proposals now presented are all very similar, particularly it regard to unit count, product mix, and primary circulation. Apparently, these alternatives are more reflective of the developer's intent. Without going into the specifics of each alternative, the unit counts range from 1,930 (5.5 du /ac average density) up to 2,076 (6.0 du /ac average density). The typical unit mix is roughly 351 multi - family and 651 single - family. Of the single - family units, 40 to 501 have a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, while only 31 range from 10,000 to 15,000 square feet. The three land use alternatives are shown at the end of this report. Alternatives One and Two are very similar in concept with a central core of multi - family units and single - family lots around the perimeter of the project. By contrast, Alternative Two proposes m0ti- family units at the southeast corner of the project along Sums•it Avenue and the Devore Freeway. A 5 acre commercial s1L4 is p:vvided along the extension of Cherry Avenue, north of Summit. A feature similar in all three alternatives is the realignment of the Hawker Crawford Channel to the south perimeter of the project (on the north side of Summit Avenue); a regional trail adjacent to San Sevatne wash and along the northerly utility corridor; a 13 acre equestrian center; primary access to Duncan Canyon to the east; and, single - family lots ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 15,000 square feet et the north end of the site in San Sevatne Canyon. Iv. ANALYSIS: The majority of cements presented in October still a a y,__w1th the exception that primary circulation to the east will be provldEd, and the design does consider the fubire San Sevatne Regional Park (pedestrian trail, landscaping, and side -on cul -de -sacs open to the wash). Equestrian trails should also be provided along the west boundary of the project and within the utility corridor connecting to the equestrian center. Regarding alternative Two, the multi- family units along Summit Avenue and the freeway may establish a undesirable precedent for development along I -15, as well as impact the rural character of the area. 05-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF PEPORT H-mt -rs Ridge Specific Plan - City of Fontana February 26, 1986 Page 05 Few design details of the plan were provided with the alternatives and are attached to this report. The Community Structure Plan (Exhibit 000) provides further detailing of Alternative Two, which may mean that it is the preferred alternative. Notes on Exhibit •D -1• state that lots will be terraced to proride views and windrows will be reintroduced. Basically, this is indicating that the natural tenures of the site will be substantially altered and existing mature vegetation removed. Given the intensity of the development, Cherry Avenue south of the site will require improvement beyond the 44 foot curb -to -curb width specified in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Added runoff from the site and with realignment of the Hawker - Crawford Channel wilt also require major Improvements of Summit Avenue where it crosses San Sevaine wash. Both of these items must be provided for with development of the site. In addition, maintenance provisions are necessary for landscaping and trails along the perimeter of the project, particularly on Summit Avenue. In summary, the major concerns regarding the alternatves appear to he as follows: 1. The overall density Is hiqh given .ite constraints and the rural character of the area. 2. The intensity of mrlti- family units along I -IS and commercial development will establish an undesirable image or precedent for future development on surrounding property. 3. Natural features of the site will be significantly altered by the plan. 4. Equestrian trails should be located adjacent to San Sevaine wash. S. Improvement costs directly related to the r viect, but within Rancho Cucamonga, mist be provided by the deveToper and /or the City of Fontana. 6. Alternatives One or Three, with larger lots along the southern boundary of the project ara no cmmeticaT facilities, are least objectionable. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Cmaission should review the propos a ernativas +s V-y relate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Comments should uc referred to the City Council by minute action for their review on March 19, 1986. 1 PLANNING COMiISSION STAFF REPORT Hunters Ridge Sp -cific Plan - City of Fontana February 26, 1e.66 Page /O i Respectfully slbeltL d, 8raf Buller City Planner 66:CJ:cv Attechwts: Exhibit A - Alternative 1 Exhibit 6 - Alternative 2 Exnibit C - Alternative 7 Exhibit D - Design Sketch for Hunter's Ridge October 9, 1965. Planning Comisslon Staff Report is Planniro-• roxisslon Minutes - October 9, 1965 ,i 1• F• ,'•• avrl f v : • �r buu..� aD i1 S Q . y . a P i `•' � � � eaoo so laoa u] e ..N SUMMARY As A's `•- i- •� ` •a ' .fJJIIiOV({PONO NATOfS14aCrffAr,' '�. f..Ir<m.+ ISD 210 JSa .� b+Nw• ++ no 270 yAo "• 'a'I I I . +• I ,V \ • I , "0 J 1600TCTLL al +A }ATS .:\ .r t I > '• :..x r'- fd+wu.fi.+w IaD AC r.' �i• a . P u ;1 • SaNurrt tlD Ac '"\• 1'•'yr+' W. ft,d Ina AC W. •_ f '.f/ �' 1` Irw .• .».. ..y ,N ♦.; w.e ass Ac H YI.rt 1 j, .•\ - . "\ ,. A TOTK SOTD AC now TIY •y • •�•Ny..i• �• �� are_rx+ •I • ... , '• •! �U _ r % -� .� , s i ' � I.•I..•tl Y411m Il4 .aI \ °`•• '•�. ••s• 1_ I3r II+x+Im 141 SAN MAW WASH � : �,utl � y � , \ mn m•o Im M1\ • ., ! it �' INw /I _ mw I I t Iw< • . ..y�t♦_.r, •:lY ^..;• ra � 'y) II ra.Nwi' 1 � Q`y• %e`�:.,Sp+ ...K 1 _ a .i • ♦ .1: I IYW .• ♦ r W+ / OI. Y10 I MNI P LD•, 1 • ` • AAW IUtl +qp .. ♦ Np MW I IUK a • • I • i11K 1 elewM �r D �'. .I HUNTER��;A SPECIFIC PLAN RIDGE I PREPAFED ev THEti y CITY OF FONTANA �S6 •i :y . • s... I' ; w..a<r ..... SUMMARY rim 2s JS• .! �': =' J>.! o .', 4 •.. rro. aurK K wf \•r•f CauY..p 10 llf y •'•t 3' Ii.` �� _ ,• Js a. .' .: - fo]o IS bS3 10 '•'�.. =,r � V`' LW IOI< ADM MrZWAIOI[}S T� rzo JID 3>? • R. '• Via. jra !'i •.� i..t sas)pr4 l ]oY qrP H)/ K VA P� TIM _. 1• 111 •i . "�• .+°rr -• cawaa.cw un K ,•i � A • \• r \.,� .'.n .r "w w•i earn\ WviW m3K \a•• Ir. •lS• i r �. � •�f f`�i PM War • .. .wv .:ii YP a iw a�r.r •�.•s rap • t • SIVJ 6FVAI! WASH •: i a K �' c • l r Af +YSa� rs • } aA tYP % � t .iN"f :: 1 pP.. l• , "T�lQA91 !i i� • S I' aOivwM .KC ' ? a ao f.w � aH • r. � MIP 1 Y.K YIK 4� •� � 4P pW -r 2 -� G 1LLa�ISWUVQII V Lei 15 HUNTERSE� pan lS /T RIDGE PREPARED O � ,N � � - Fy t.i t•• r:-1 • , T •LL, •,` •J' Y` 111 l 1•L - 1 .• .�1' saw eevd:e w4a11 Y• ��' ,� I/ .I� °It.t {pow• , •� Jam{ F1 V �1 IA SPECIFIC PLAN SUk ,*AARY . ♦.. " f y Trw OW6C 4C WS ai.�, " ,; :•) )+...J 7" .•. TAO 06 i1U 160 46 1233 Sg, > P r S . • �. y 6000 aD •t 6 406 �• `(.INaOiaaRpN011/,il7Nk r03i' r ie•ILmn ILL Ito f16 iw ° 4/ i y'YI'• J 'a .•r. SWTOTLL 161.6 1.6]0 • .• ' '4• pY.•�uyy .)V1PIL1 J.. i.0 •1 �' .} ..\ ••t v4• •^•S1NS� KwaIIN lie aC �f 1664 FE ^-1 I Ww UOaC \' r•`•••n; � Wit.'•• .. :•Mi TOM TOi.LL 6qA aG J\ alt-• L R•iq TIU Jam{ F1 V �1 IA SPECIFIC PLAN 4554"45,ry MAO Ow RAvrs rwv c GavAfavq;' r � I_ i � o HUNTERS RIDGE an v rorwwuvrnu CITY OF R.11M.'I-i0 CUCAMaNUA PLANNUI C DtvMN rmm: &Amm k Aam 1TTIE• MEW- 7:L SCAB .=;kT9 V V NOKPH CEO sr l:cr -" 3771=7 R"M A i rJ PEDESTRIAL TRAIL - STREETS OPEN (/ w••^ V TO TRAIL I "r t Q REGIONAL EOUESTRIAN CENTER r .e4�S .�i SECONDARY PROJECT ENTRY Le"•r "s"�' u�" SPECIAL THEME INTERSECTIONS _','T�,a>�il• palm trees, special lighting ' �• REINTOOOUCTION OF N:'PNOWS C, LOTS TERRACED WITH CONTOURS TO PROVIDE VIEI /S l .,...n j WITH LANDSCAPE N IMPROVED W TfH y ,(V PALM TREE ENTRY ROADS triangularly space palm Vasa • I iiyr•' _ ,� Pedestrian Nall / Upended lights to GUIs grans seals 1 place de IIgbU oo flees at rand Seats H 1 RELOCATED HAWKER j, y I� ,• ' CRAWFORD C14ANNEL 1 off- street bike trail .. eapanded greenbelt. L treat and turf adjacent to street • ys'-( t — — I"" edge Planted bap at channel inlemal PedeslflAll Iraq to correct 1 belt 000 Image with gndscapmp. P:IIMARY PROJECT ENTRY itsee and twf simisted gate Emus I balls, night lighting FOPEGROUND LANDSCAPING TO HELP =01111 over bridge to project entry SCREEN HOMES IN ➢A-7 river rock Pilasters KCROUHD palm beat up- lights HUNTERS RIDGE CITY OF FONTANA. CA SH . CITE OF Mt, RAl\CM CUCAMaNCA PLA1vNM D[vEm SCALE, 060 STONE PILASTER IN MEDIAN TO CREATE SENSE OF ENCLOSURE, ACCEKT PAVING -� PE ESTRIAN TRAIL WOOD RAILS W /RT)NE --� PILASTERS ON bAIDOE Primary Project Entry W r a a LARGE ENTRY PILASTER W ri WALL W /WALL OF s CT COMPLIMENTARY COLOR u DI&LPALM TREES—TALL AL ELEMENT TO CRTE FURTHER SENSES F ENTRY FIRWKER CRAWFORD -- ' CHANNEL �- RIP -RAP EDGE d CHANNEL S U M M I T A V E PEDESTRIAN TRAIL TO CCNNECT EXPANDED RIGHT -OF -WA WITH COMMUNITY TRAIL SYSTEM TO INCLUDE BIKE TRAP_ THEME LOW RAIL FENCE RIP-RAP CHANNEL EDGE WALL BUFFER PLANTIIO TO SCRR EEN RESIDENTIAL UNITS TURF OR GROUNOCOVER ON BASE OF CHANNEL Section of Hawker Crawford Channel rUMMIT AVE -RANDOM TREE PLANTING TO CREATE TURF d TURN -OUT AREAS ALONG TRAIL CITY OF mot, .A.wT=4 At=$ RANCHO CUCAIVIOC' 'VGA mu, etatvt PC txviSM ,-.�:15 S, RESIDENTIAL CUL- D -e -JAC BACKS TO EXPANDED PARKWAY SHRUB d VINE PLANTING TO SOFTEN WALL PARKWAY OPENS TO CREATE AN EXPANDED SENSE OF SPACE CHERRY AVE BROAD VISUAL PENETRATION TO AVOID TUNNEL EFFECT Cherry Ave Plan TILE ROOF CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT PROJECT FOR COHESIVE APPEARANCE TURF PRIMARY PLANTING TO CREATE CLEAN UNIFORM EDGE TO STREET L r � C IL+�I DOUBLE ROW OF PALM - TREES TO FIRST INTERSECTION Cherry Street Section Adjacent to Project Entry r �r• ��a Vr, pliliUy um, f.w -1 rarer Elevation of Primary Entry CUL -DE -SACS OPEN TO TRAIL — PROVIDES CONNECTION TO OPEN SPACE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL— RANDOM PLANTING IIIL OF BKVLU7E 6UFFER - -;�_ J eloo SAN BEVAINE WASH AIP -RAP BANK San Sevaine Wash Edge Treatment CI'T'Y OF rrENiu _fps R000 RANCHO CLUAMUMA Tnu, YL.AINNM DrVEM EX W-Z SCALD X103 CI4T OF RANCHO CUCnmUNGA STAFF REPORT U a Z U > DATE: October 9, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner i SUBJECT: HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY OF FONTAHA - Planning omm s� s51on rev ew o an use a ternat vet or the Hunters Ridge Specific Plan on 580 acres of land within the City of Fontana, located on the north side of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek, west of the Devore Freeway. I ABSTRACT: The Cil of Fontana is currently preparing a Specific aP —n- or the Hunt Club property recently annexed. The consultant selected to prepare the document, the Planning Center, will present three preliminary land use alternatives to the City Council on October 16, 1985. Prior to this date, the Council is requesting informal comments from the Planning Commission. The Co=ission should focus their review of the alternatives on impacts of the project as they relate to Rancho Cucamonga. II. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has an opportunity to c=enf on the Spetiflc Plan as provided for in a settlement agreement with Fontana. The agreement resulted from litigation filed by the City upon action by LAFCO removing the prooerty from the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence and annexing it into the City of Fontana. In summary, the settlement agreement establishes that the gross density of the property will be no more than 4 units per acre. The City of Fontana shall require payment of school impaction fees and any other fees which may be identified as necessary mitigation in the EIR or Specific Plan. The two cities agree to cooperate in encouraging a region&. park rest of the site in the area of the San Sevalne Creek. In addition, the agreement specifies that three land use alternatives be presented to the Rancho Cucamonga City Co.,ncil and their comments will be given 'serious consideration by the City of Fontana". III ISSUES: At the time of the agreement, the City was concerned with TH- e- 7nllowing is<ues Unit (.punt: As shown on Exhibit 'A', the only access to the site I—scurrently through Rancho Cucamonga, so the total number of dwelling units within the project has a direct affect on this City. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Nap originally D 'TER V ip (/� PLANNING CO}t4ISSION "c REPORT HUNTERS RIDGE SPECK JAN - CITY OF FONTANA October 9, 1985 Page 2 designated the site Very Low Residential (less than 2 (!u /ac) and Hillside Residential. Land Use Transltians: The area within the City of Rancho Cucamonga sou o�Tur+a t iTvenue is designated as Very Low Residenttal (half - acre lots) Development on the site should provide an appropriate transition.. Circultin: Major access to the site 1s provided by an extension of C re-F6,' ivenue. The Etiwanda Specific Plan shows Cherry Avenue and t Avenue as only two lanes adjacent to the project. Increased density on the site will necessitate expanding the road widths. D:ainaa9 Facilities: Development of the property will increase nnaff anS­Tmpact downstream properties, unless adequete improvements are planned. Services / Commercoal: Considering the lsoiateJ location of the proper y, a equ a schools, parks, water and sewer, and emergency services oust be provided. In addition, traffic will pass through Etiwanda traveling to and from commercial facilities. IV. SITE DESL'RIPTIGN: The 580 acre site is generally in natural con on w t ew improvements. Buildings on the site include a club house for the Hunt Club, a stone resident± and maintenance sheds. Flood control improvements Include a diversion dike and levee on the west side of the property and flood control levee crossing the southeast corner of the site. Electrical transmission lines cross through the north - central portion of the site. In addition, a 14WD right -of -way traverses the southern portion of the site. V. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES: As mentioned, The Planni,,g Center has eve op t roe an use alternatives. The number of units in -ach alternative ranges from the low of 1105 up to 2141. Approximately 350 acres of the site will be developed as residential and the three alternatives show average net densities ranginj from 4.6 units per acre to 6.0 units per acre. Primary alto, is provided off Summit Avenue by a northerly extension of Cherry Avenue. A brief description of each alternative follows: Alternative One 1s based on the concept of graduation of density, turn t a most intense along Summit Avenue (Cminercial, Multi- Family) to the least intense at the mouth of San Sevaine Canyon. This alternative calls for 1947 units on 350 acres with an average density of 5.6 units per acre. Approximately 25% of the units are multi- family. Townhouses, apartments, and a five acre commercial ��S PLANNING CDNNISSION — REPORT HINTERS RIDGE SPECI JAN - CITY OF FORTANA October 9, 1985 Page 3 site are located along the north side of Summit Avenue. Half -acre lots are proposed at the north end of the site. Secondary access is provided to Summit Avenue and a connection to the east is planned. The major disadvantage of this alternative relates to land use transition and circulation. The tolmhouses, apartments and commercial zoning at the south end of the site would be- Incompatible with half -acre lots south of Summit Avenue. In addition, t3rihouses and 6000 square foot lots are proposed as a transition to the possible regional park along San Sevaine Creek - Regarding circulation, the street pattern directs traffic to Rancho Cucamonga with only secondary access to the cast. A positive element under this alternative is the attempt to incorporate some of the existing mature vegetation (Pappers, Eucalyptus). d/ � DUNNING COMISSION //''�- REPORT eJ4v HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIPI- 1J1 - CITY OF iONTAHA - October 9. 1905 Page 4 ATR AiiIVE1 C;)( 7 my •� fs� si n• ti z wi I G �•� r�W •n owes vi 0 PLANNING C"ISSION r"-REPORT Yb'NTERS RINE SPECIii -AN - CITY OF FONTANA October 9, 1985 Page 5 Alternative Two calls for a high intensit; t e s to ormrercial and Multi- Family), i decreasing troth to the north and south. the most intense of the three, it proposes of land with an average density of I Approximately 35% of the units are meilti -fr single family on 4500 square foot lots. 1200 square foot lots are located on the along the extension of Cherry Avenue. Ha in San Sevaine Canyon. Secondary future east. C about half way up ensities gradually lternative is also units on 354 acres S per net acre. nd another 44% are e family homes on side of Summit and r -acre rocs are access is shorn The proposed r1ensity of this alternative would create the greatest impact on Rancho Cuceraonga. The vast majority of units are either multi- family or single family on 4500 square foot lots. Also, it does not appear that the proposed intensity considers the slope of the land and grading impacts. As the Commission is avire, side and rear yard slopes significantly reduce building pads and yard areas, particularly on small lot subdivisions. Given these factors, massive grading and the use of retaining walls will be necessary to maintain. the unit count. MM A PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIM- .-AN - CITY OF FONTANA October 9, 1985 Page 6 ALT�ER�_ATINIE�2. A,� Wm ,/yam R ♦ +� miz 91 i S f�v '1 Ip. /• /M,J c �P ? M MMIM6 C0191ISSION REPORT f IKWERS RI06E SPEC[ _ .AN - CM : F FORMA October 9, 1985 Page 7 Alternative Three has the lowest density with 1706 units on 370 acres. loge density of residrtlal property is 4.6 dwelling units per net acre. Half -acre lots are shown on the north side of Summit and along the extension of Cherry. Apartment units at 20 dwellings per acre are proposed at the mouth of San Sevaine Canyon. Ib commercial use is provided. Primary access from the east is planned. This alternative calls for a lower unit count, half -acre lots along the south project boundary, and larger single family lots along San Setalne Creek, and primary circulation to the east. The area of concern is the rpartamts In San Sevaine Canyon. Though of limited effect on Random Cucamonga, the proposed net density of 20 units per acre will have a severe Impact on the character of the area and will - m4dlre substantial alteration of existing land fors. C_;�%D PAINING COMMISSION J' REPORT HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIfI_ JAN - CITY OF FONTFRA l October 9, 1985 cz9e R A LTERNA 1VE 3 a7/ ' PLANNING COtMISSION l REPORT Ir HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIM. .AN - CIT', OF F04TANA October 9, 1985 Page 9 ' VI. St#MMY: No one alternative seems to provide the optimum scenario wTtF respect to lmpa:ts on Rancho Cucamonga. iowever alternative Three appears to be the most acceptable in teias of its relationship to Rancho Cucamonga, in that it incorporates several t characteristics important to the City, as outlined below: 1. Total unit count is somewhat lower (t1700 du's), reflecting more sensitivity to site constraints and surrounding 1:-,J uses; „ 2. A circulation system which depends heavily on access to Duncan Canwn (to ' .. east), rather than eaphasizino bomuit and Cherry ' Avenubs; 3. Half -acre 'estate' lots adjacent to Summit Avenue and uti,er areas designated for less than 2 Was in the Rancho Cucamonga Genaral Plan; 4. Lack of ctvwnerical or other intensive use activities; and S. A mix of dwelling types (single family vs. multi- family) more in tune with existing and planned development in the area. In addition, the final concept selected should facilitate tte following: 1. Preservation and sensitivity to existing natural features and land forms, particularly in regard to mature vegetation and grading; 2. Sensitivity to natural hazards, such as slopb stability, flooding and seismic conditions; 3. Integration of San Sevaine Creek into the design of the project through appropriate orientation and 14ad use transitions; and 4. Regional trail connections as outlined in the Ci:y's General Plan and Nest Valiey Foothills Plan. VII. RECONMCNOATION: The Planning Commission should review the proposed a ernes v♦ es as they relate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Comoents should be referred to the City Council by minute a:tion for their review on October 16, 1985. �,a OLANNING COK41:SION REPORT C HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIk- .AN - CITY OF FONTANA October 9, 1S35 Page 10 submitted, �omwnitp Development Director JL:CJ:ko Attachments: Exhibit •A° - location Map ^rel:minary Drcft - Hunter Ridge Specific Plan D73 ..I, J�-1- mks z� I e 'W — T 2i ,:7 GuM,• / z I I / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING D1VMX w SAN GABRIEL MTS �•••� • \ :, 23 o ► a 4O•` • L *'RESERVOIR '1 i a ?Y ^ NIMPROVED'.%. 7 AINAGE COUr%SE :412 / ` I �•••� • \ :, 23 o ► a 4O•` • L *'RESERVOIR '1 i a ?Y C C V. HUNTERS P.[DGE SPECIFIC PLAN - LITY OF FONTANA - Planning Commission review o and use a ternat vas or: a unter s ge Specific Plan on 580 acres of land within the City of Fontana, located north of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevatne Creek, west of the Oevore Freeway. Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea stated that she was concerned with the overall density of the project, and particularly with transition of density. She stated that Alternatives 1 and 2 should not even be considered; possibly something more along the lines of Alternative 3 in terms of circulation and transition of density. She was also concerned with the large number of small single family homes. She suggested that preservation and sensitivity to historical structures should be considered and that fire and wind hazard should also be addressed, along with the feasibility of requiring fire sprinklers. Commissioner Rempel stated that he shared these concerns and was also concerned with access. He advised that the locaton of streets going west needs to be delineate) and was concerned that street connect tons were not shown on the map. He was also concerned that this may be the last review the j Planning Commission will be afforded and was unhappy with not seeing something in the finer detailed stages. Mr. Johnston advised that the West Valley Foothills Plan show a majors east /west corridor north of Sumit• however, the idea was that San Sevaine Creek would be a logical boundary between the two cities and since a regional 4 park is planned for that location it was thought that there would not be a i street connection there. k Commissioner Barker didn't like the idea of taking all the traffic through Rancho Cucamonga's streets. He advised that the impact on traffic is going to be considerable especially with this increase in density. Furthzr, that the Issues recognized by staff in the report capsulizes the concerns of the Commission in their review of any other project with regard to transition of << density, seismic, and compatibility. He stated that the list given by staff is a starting point along with the criteria used in the Commission's approval of the projects to the west and adiacent area. He stated that this project must be compatible and should refect the same kinds oP standards, sizes, and Y other criteria used by Rancho Cucamonga to the full extent possible. He considered all three alternatives unacceptable. Commissioner Chitiea questioned why all three alternatives show open space and parks in the same location. a+ Mr. Johnston replied that approximately 2/3 of the park land is going to be located within utility corridors. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker, that all three alternatives presented were unacceptable. Staff to preparA comments to the applicant. Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -16- October 9, 1985 .�Y ass 9 . r C AYES: CO`LYISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BARKER, REIPEL NOES: CWIMISSIONEP- NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUT tarried DIRECTOR'S REPORTS W. HIGHLAND AVENUE WALLS AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - Oral eport Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. He -Muested that the Commission direct staff As to whether a test section of the wall should be constructed or if they felt comfortable enough to allow the applicant to construct the entire wall. Commissioner Rempel stated that the proposed design would make an attractive wall and would have no problem with constructing the entire wall. Commissioner Chitlea agreed. Motion Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chltiea, to approve the Highland Avenue walls and Landscape Design as presented. Motion carried by the following vot=. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUT - carried t i f f t K. TERRA VISTA ELEIEN7ARY SCHOOL DESIGN - k9LFF LANG, CHRISTOPHER - Oral eport Dan Coleman, Senior Pl+mner, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Coleman asked the Commission to consider the option of continuing this item for review by the full Comafsslcn. Commissioner Rempel stated that It is not known what the time line is that has been established by the School District. Vtce- Chairman Barker was concerned with the aesthetic appearance of the structures and that the fact that they would je there for a tremendous amount of time until the state finds some way of funding school buildings. Planning Commission Minutes -17- October 9, 1985 c)-7� — CITY or RANCHO CUCA.MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1986 e TO: Mayor and ►Ambers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City clanner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSULTANT CONTRACT - FOOTHILL BOULEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN AND y Council approval o consultant contract or the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment. BACKGROUND: The Community Development Department recommends that of rwa- PTanning Network be retained to prepare The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment. Six firms were interviewed in January, and two were selected to prepare a revised Scope of Work for the project after input from City Staff concerning major issues, study methodology, and the desirable end product. The revised Scope of Work submitted by Forma - Planning Network exhibited a higher degree of sensitivity to the needs of the City, as well as a better understanding of the local issues and concerns. The revised proposals were presented to the Planning Commission at their February 12, 1986 meeting. The Commissioners indicated a high level of confidence and preference for the Scope of Work submitted by Forma- Planning Network. Attached to this report is the proposed cant ^act including the City's Request For Proposal and the Scope of Work prepared by Forma- Pltnning Network. An outline of the project is provided in the following sections: II. SCOPE OF WORK: The proposed Scope of Work as seven basic componen as o lam: Cosmuntt Involvement: Emphasis has been placed on mammon y nvo vement throughout the process. Included in the proposals are five meetings with property owners, tenants, and residents on a Subarea basis; eight Public Workshops with as Ad Hoc Committee; on -site wetings with interest groups as needed; and five Public Hearings with the Planning Commission and /or City Council. In additicn, bi- weekly meetings with City Staff are included. The mateup of the Ad Hoc Committee has yet to Q-7 7 CITY COURCIL STAFF REPORT March 20, 1986 Consultant Contras Page 2 be determined; however, seven menbers are anticipated. Upon approval of the contract, Staff will follow up at a later meeting with a recommendati.m for the structure of the Committee. Research and Analysis�: The basic components of the re—an anan�hase includes research of existing land uses, parcelization, ownership, public facilities, and architectural /site conditions. In addition, a detailed economic analysis will be performed. Opportunities and constraints will be determined and a detailed report prepared. Goals and OW'arzives: The next step in the process will F prepay ng —coals and objectives for land use and design issues plus econom.c development. Re- evaluation and revis'ins to the goals and objectives will occur as the stud, iovcs along. Alternatives: A series of alternatives rill be prepared n response to opportunities and constraints, current issues, short and long term market conditions, and the goals and objectives. The alternatives will relate to the physical development of the study area by addressing land use and urban design. Preparation of The Draft 5 ecific Plan: The Draft ec c an tf nc u e pre erre land use and urban design pans; economic development plans; phasing plan; design Suidellnes, illustrations and standards; and circulation analysis. The focus of the plan will not only be the physic -0 development of The Foothill Corridor, but also an aggressive implenentatfon /action program ec which outlines methods the City can employ to foster Environmental Assessment: During preparation of the ra pee c an, an expanded Initial Study will be prepared by the consultant. Poteotlal environmental ^onsequencies of The Specific Plan and their probable level of significance will be evaluated. 8.ised on this information, the City will determine if a Negative Declaration or Focused Environmental Impact Report is necessary. e• CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT March 20, 1986 Consultant Contract Page 3 Pre oration of the Final Plan and Environmental sessmen : e ra an w e su ec i pubTic coamef—a—na review by the Ad Hoc Cowittee, Planning Commission, and City Council. Throughout this process revisions to the draft will be prepared, After approval by the City Council, the final plan will be formated and finished graphics prepared. III. SCHEDULE: The project schedule indicates an eleven month time i am—e— for adoption of the Specific Plan. The Draft Plan and Environmentot Assessment will be completed in month seven with thr_ approval process therea' ter. IV. BUDGET: The Contract specifies $118,400 for consultant services; ems, the Fiscal Year 1985 -85 budget for professional services for the Foothill Boulevard Plan !quals f125,000. Reimbursable /non -labor costs (blueprinting, photographic and graphic supplies) will be $6600 plus photo - copying /printing of Staff Reports, work products, and the Draft and Final Plan. Throughout the negotiations, Staff has eghasized to the consultant the need to eliminate nonessential tasks and focus on developing a meaningful plan within the authorized budget. Y. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and approv'5F roposed contract by Hiiute Action. Arty minor revisions deemed necessary can be incorporated with concurrence by Forma - Planning Network at the meeting. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Plarner BB:CJ:das AttacN.ents: Contract 0 `r 079 r . ..•: �. • M Ms• � This Agceeeent is mach and entered into this _ day of , 1986, bebmern the City of Pancho Ncmmnga, a VAmicipal Wrporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY') and Form - PIAt.NM M74a'tK (hereinafter referred to as "CQSl1I.T Vr). A. Aeeitale (i) CIRY has heretofore issued its is =quest for Proposal pertaining to the perfoamce of professional services wiTh respect to the preparation of Man= B=iVAIm SPE=C MAN ('Project' here- after), a full, true and correct copy of tddch is atUmhed hereto as Fkhi bit 'j\' and by this reference mode a part hereof. (ii) CCItRII.17rN1 has now submitted its proposal for the perfourance of such services, a full, true and correct copy of tiddch prcvosal is Atadled hereto as Edtibit "B' and by this reference wade a part hrreot. (iii) CITY desires to retain CCtbRLTAVf to perform profes- sional services necessary to render advice anti assistance to CITY, CM.8 planning amtisaion, City Otmcil and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) cmum.mM represerts that it is qualified to per- form mrh services and is willing to perfom such professional cervicov as beroInafter defined. -1- p/S pQq,Sm 157/05.090 03/Il/86 � C J:+ NOW, 11OQ'ORE, it is agreed by and between cm and C@75mz ,;r as follows: B. Agreement 1. Definitions: The following definitioav shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires (a) Project: The preparation of Plans described in Dd ibit W hereto including, but rat limited to, the preparation of mops. surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to ci7Y as roquirod and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CM with respect to the Project. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary bo be prefor ad by OCN Ml2LVr in order to ca plete the Project. (c) Caarecement of Project: CONS[UMM agrees to ommence week on Fay 1, 1966. (d) anpletion of Project: 77he date of CW4)le- tlon of all phases of the Project, including any and all promdures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentation and attendance by Q251A,MU at public hearings regarding the adoptim of Plans as set forth in the Schedule, E.'ddbit `V hereto. 2. CONSULMW agree+ as follows: (a) cQ7uRII,mw shrU forthwith undertake and com- plete the project in accordance with r/dhibits •A• and •B• hereto and all in e«ardince with Federal, State acrd MY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CIM (b) Ca?YA AVr shall supply copies of all naps, surveys, reports, plans ond doarrcshbi (hereinafter collectively refer red to as •doamrnts') including all supplemental tochn:aal dominants, �2- P/S POU.SM 157 /05.000 03M /es 9 % as described in Ddubits `A• and •e" be C11Y within the time specified in Schedule, Edilbit 'C'. Prior to oxa encing work OOSULMW shall specify exact dates of ell primary meetings noted on the Schedule. Copies of the documents snail 53 in such maebexs as are required by Exhibit 'D'. CITY may thereafter review and forward to QNSI LMM camarts regarding said dcaaents and CMZU.TANr shall thereafter make such revisions to :aid dcaaenta as are deemed necessary. CM shall receive revised daunents in such form and in the quantities deter- mined necessary by CM. Vie Lima limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82. (b) may be exterdal upon written approval of CITY. (c) CC1X=Hr shall, at COFSIILTANr's sole wet and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CMZMTNM, be necessary to o®ply with tethav of this Agreawnt. :n the event any such other persons are retained by CMMM77WN COtSIbMW hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qual, '.ed to perform services required hereum.er. CMZ7JLTANr futher agrees that no subcontractor shall be retah.ed by CClStMVM campt upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. C Y :ghee as follows: (a) 7b pay CMMMM KI' a maximn of One Hundred and Eighteen Thousand, Four nandred ($118,400.00) Dollars for the perfonmme of the serices required hereunder. The COtSf zk-r shall not proceed with the focused M31 and Fiscal Analysis as used in Fkhibit •D• until the CCNS[8a7M has reaeived written approval from the City to proud. 7his = shall cover the cost of all the staff tire and or fees, inclining the work of aNdaye s, consultants and subcontractors to CCM=AFa. Additionally. the CITY will reimburre the OCNSULMW Six Thousand. Six Hundred 06.6001 Dollars for direct printing, phothgraphy, and reprndhctirat costs associated with this Pro_ ject and requested by the CITY. Payment to COh W-vr, by CITY, ah. I be made in awordance with the Schedule -.t forth below. (b) Falnent to CCMMV.Vr shall be made by I=Y in aomrdanco with the invoices submitted by CCMMTAHr acw-4L g to Proposed Budgets, Exhibit "Do: inclusive -f a twenty (201) percent - 3 - P/S Ai?II..4ID 03/11/86 b O 15)iCK.00o retainer. Said retainer shell be applied tewud the first invoice(s). Such invoice(s) shall ba paid within a reauanable time after said invoice(s) are received try cm a1d upon cospletion of each task, as outlined in . xhibit "D ". The t7mLmw may invoice and be paid by the CrrY upon mrpletion of fifty (500) percent of the Draft Specifir. Plan as sham in ) xhibit "D•. All charges shall be in accordance with e0*LS1ATlv7f1a proposal either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum aconmts for indivimml tasks. To CITY shall retain the budget amount of Sixteen Thousand 4$16,000.001 Dollars for the cvnmmity involvement task until conpletim of the Project. If the schedule is delayed at any time by rerr= of a suspension order by the CITY or because of any other act of rho MY, or because of neglect by the CITY without contributory fault nr neglect on the part of tho C=ULTAW, the CQ4SULW& may invoice the and be paid by CITY a coats to -date on any trek or budget, except the cWmnity involveaent task (e) Additional services: Payment for additional rerviees requested, in writing, by CITY, aryl not included in CMUJL- MM's proposal as set forth in Exhibit "B" hereof, shall be paid on a reirbtsse merit basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in said Exhibit "B". Charges for adlitional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by = within a reasonable tSae after said invoices are received by CM. 4. CITY agrees to provide to Consultant: (a) Information and assistarce as set forth in Exhibit •A" hereto. (b) Photographically bible copies of maps arid other information, if available, which MiSlI MM considers rmessary in order to complete the Project. (c) Such information as is generally available form CITY files applicable w the pm,ect. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining in- formation fun otter governmental agencies and /or private Partial. Bosever, it shall be CChbiIIMWrls responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. -4_ P/S ASMf.SM 03/rl/86 ON 157/05.000 S. Ownership of 0onaments: All docvmrts, data, studies, sLrveys, drawings, naps, models, photographs and reports preiarcd by CMMa7 C pursuant to this Agreement stall be considered tle property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by a%%MVM, such docents and other identified materials shall be deliver -d to QTY by CerLRIIIIANf. C3=LVM may, however, mate and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CM IIGANI' aey desire. 6. 1Yrmirmtionn This Agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written 'Notice of 'lpraaination` to O2w, Wr at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notum. In the evamt this Agreemnt is so teaml- nabed, CaZ==?r shall be coapeLated at O-SUU ARr's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Zdaibit `B`, on a pro -rataa basis with respect be the percentage of the Project completed as of the date of termination. 1h no event, however, shall ORZWZANr receive aura than the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a), above. Ct7lSfA MM shall pro- vide `o CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs ani reports, adnebmr in draft or final form, prepared by CMSUEMW as of the data of teaai ation. CMMtM7 P may not terminate this Agree ant except for cause. -5- P/S AW.SM 157/05.000 03/il/86 on 7. Notices and Oooignated Pepresentatives: Any and all notices, danads, imoic6 and written emmmicaticm between the Parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for tha performance by the parties under this Agrocmnt: 0117: CITY CF RANCBD COCAMMM Planning b_pare n- 9320 Baseline Idead Btooho OxAmmrya, Ch 91730 CCtXMTANr: Fa M1- PLO..1UM Nd:1S M Rick 0mez 1055 Narth fl:clid Chtario, CA 91762 Any such notices, dmads, invoices and written cmmricacians, by nail, shall be deasai be have been received by the addressee forty - eight (48) hours after deposrt thereof in the United Stairs mail, postage prepaii and properly addressed as set forth abew. 8. n.surance: O-Ma Hr shall neither camenee rack under this Agresmht until it has obtained all insaranco required hereunder in a cmT&V or omQanies eceeptable tc, CITY nor shall MMXTAUr allow airy &Lrontractor to aamence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subconta• for has been obtained. OMMLTAW shall take ojt arl maintain at aJ tines during the ter of this Agrecnent the following policies of insurance. (e) Abrkar's 22EE uaticn Insurance: Before beginning work, CCNSLZMW shall furnish to MY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' cmpensatien Insurance for all persons whoa it may mploy directly or bhragh sub- contractors in carrying cut the work specified herein, in accoalance with t`n laws of the State of California. -6- P/S ACS =xm 157/05.000 03/Ti/86 a6S In accordance with the provisions of California's Labor Cade Section 3700, every emp)ayer shall secure the payment of oorpensation to his employees. C•=MAM prior to canmscinq work. shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows. "I an aware of the provisions of Section t 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured egairst liability far, workers' compensation ' or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the ' provisions of that Code, and I will carply with such f n isitns oefore c=aerc pow rang the performance of the e, ,+ork of this Aateenent." (b) Public Libility and Property amnagp- 7hroughcut the term of this Agreement, at MISULTAIMs sole cost and ! experse, C -gff,7AMr shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CD!b1 =1r, comprehensive, Y broad form, general public liability an: autcrr,bila insurance against 3 claims and liabilities for personal i n mry, death, or property dmago arising from CCTiS(] MW's activities, providing protection of at least i Cne Million ($1,000, 000.00) Dollars for bodily injury or death to any 1 ? one psson or for arty one accident or o=ar -ice and at least one Million ($1, 000,000.00) Dollars for property damage. ' (c) General Insurance Rsgniireenta• all c _ fin=ance required by express ptm•Lsion cf thin Agreement shall be g carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do )usinuess s the State of California and policies required under lars- r graphs 8.(a) and (b) -hall name as additional insureds CrrY, its elected officials, officer3, mployees, and agents. All pollcier. r. + shill contain language, to the extent otaina,re, to the effect -hat: F� (1) the maser waives the right of subrogation against. CITY and - CrrY's elected officials, officers, etnloyees, and agents; (2) the Policies are prire.ry and noncontributing with arty insurance that miy be -arrieO ay I=; and (3) they vannot be cancelled or materially ' rmam.,•. , •; - after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY .',.r' -ail. O't=LTAMr shall furnish CM with copies of all It, : in i�Jptly upon receipt of thm, or certificate evidencing the -7- P/S A(m..,m 03/8/86 o' Jlp 157/05.000 inserai.o. armhLM?r may of feet for its can acarmt insuranco not required order this Agreement. 9 Indamificaticn: CMML=M shall defend, indem- nify and sew harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, Officers, agents and caployees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by aPbZdLM of any and all legal costs and attorneys, fees, in any manner rising out of or incidental to the performance ty arsLMTW of thia Agree - umt, including, but not limited to, all eonseTxmtial d&mges, to the maximr extent permitted by lane. 10. Assignmt: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation Of parfar snee hermader shall be made, wither in whole or in part, by 02=VW wJthout the prior written consent of CM. li. Independent mntractert 'fie partic3 hereto agree that CtaMMTANT and its employers, officers and agents am independent eontractars under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be enplcyees of CITY. 12. Governing Lawt This Agreeent shall be go anal by and eenstmod in accordance with U%e laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Feest In the event any legal proceeding is imUtutod to enforce any tem or provisien of the Agreement, tho Fmmiling party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys, fees and tests from the opposing party in an atnmmt detrrmined by the Oast to be reasonable. 14. lhtiro Agreements This Agreement supersedes a. and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agroment acknowledges that no representation bI any party which is -8- P/S AQ27.= 157 /05.000 03M/86 h ■ not aebodiod herein nor' any odes a7remeot, statment, or Promise ct contained in this Age mcnt shill be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agrement shall be effective may if it is in writing, and signed by all patticc. IN WMSS itMMW, the pattwe hereto haw emcuted this Agrement as of tha day and year first set faith abmet ;_yes. CONSULTANT -V City Clark .' Ap,r, \. l6 ?d Lity Attorney '9- P/8 AC W.SM 157 /05.000 OJ/fl /8a "1:1 o ?L-21t DATE: TO: C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIHONGA a JMD.wu.l. cbUtmi.a "31 a,m., Nfia Mdrr r`DaM rarYAMTkM October 25, 1965 All Interested Parties SUBJECT: RE Elpl ST FOIL P� SSAI - FCpTHitl MEVMD SPECIFIC PLAN AND I. INTRODUCTiON/BACKCIDUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planting Div s co IS s ng a multi- disclPttrary consulting tee to perform all services necessary to complete the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and correspocding Environmental Assessment. The fire selected must have cxtensive experience and qualifications with respect to la=id planning, urban design, land use, and development processes involving significant comunity participation. In addition, various phases of the project 4111 require expertise is land economics, civil /traffic engiraeeing, radevelopeent, e.7d environmental review. O p q EXHIBIT W ns.usetlNS ROAD. eurm c . ►arl,r►Ite amrx aer . RAMajo CLVAMW" CM MLnA nr:e . rnn aea•Imi The planning prccess will oMhasize community involvaoent to develop appreciation for the Issues, as well as understanding snd support for the plan and its Implementation program. The final document must provide an efficient land use pattern and balance of uses with specific development criteria to meet the City's goals for Foothill Boulevard: to establish an economically viable, high quality, attractive, and unifyingy design t:aage reflective of its heritage, community and to provide a viable setting for a balance of residential and commercial activities with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access. Major eiments of the plan will inctuda land use and master planning, architecture and site plan design guidelines and technical standards, streetscape design, and a realistic Implementation program that deals with constraints as well as opportunities. Foothill Boulevard has a dual function as the major cocmercial corridor and primary Last -west transportation artery in the City (State Highway 66). The City's General Plan identifies the dissggregate nature of existiog IW uses, the heavily rutc- dependent cammorcial activities, the Importance of Foothill Boulevard as a traffic carrying artery, and the need to strengthen the viability of existing comercial development. in addition, the General Plan encourages integrated center dovelopment (rather than strip commercial) and emphasizes the head for a consistent appearance and design thew, retention of historic community identity, distinguishing major intersections, and signlfleant landscaping to reflect the quality and historic character of the O p q EXHIBIT W ns.usetlNS ROAD. eurm c . ►arl,r►Ite amrx aer . RAMajo CLVAMW" CM MLnA nr:e . rnn aea•Imi asquest for Propose' - Foothill Doulevard Specific Plan & Env1.amental Assessment City's enviranomt and agricultural history. The City's design review process and 1907 Devetopmnont Code provide a strong basis for irplementatlon with high quality architecture and site planning requirements; however, a more efficient land use pattern, specific design guidelines, and an implaemtation progr= designed to deal with specific conditions are necessvy to achieve tae long -tan goals for Foothill Boulevard. Interim Policies were to address developee review process during The interie Policlai development, non -conf prelloinary review re new project the first t .opy of the r the City Council in October, 1985 issues end to guide the project on of the Foothill Boulevard Plan. land use, muster planning, new s end structures, and establish a by the Planning Commission for any e Study Area. They also represent pra:ess for Foothill Boulevard. A attached. II. STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION: The Study Area include3 Foothill Bou from the wester y ty limits at Grove Avenue, east to Deer Channel near Haven Avenue. Also Included Is the area Foothill Boulevaro in Etlwanda between Interstate 15 Q Freeway) and East Avenue. The length of the Study Area is fo miles. while the depth typically follows the boundary of G Cosmercial, Office /Professfonal, anf Medium P.osidential pre al:r7 Foothill Boulevard, including vacant and /or dsveli pl.oerty which may impact the Corrt!nir (see Exhibit A). Ex siniis family subdivisions abutting the Foothill Corrido excluded, but must be considered in the planning process. majority of the study area is within the boundaries of the i Redeveiopmnt A:ency. Existing development in the Study Area consists of a full range of' uses; older single - family structures, mobile home parks, oldan I rcial buildings, as all as neo development consistent with current standards. The lot configuration and size also varies considerably from numerous small lots that ar: not developable by themselves to larger prepertles thet have a potential for center davelopaemt, but have circulation and other obstacles relating to older development and saallar fragmented lots, ill. ISSUES CONCERNS: The following to a listing o! the major areas of concern an ssues which must V, addressed: Land Use: Inefficient land use pattern; strip ceenqrcial evvee%pmen_1 with fragmental ownership; small non - conforming lots; conversion or removal of older single family structures for commercial developrent; luA use transition from adjoining single family subdivfsf,ns or mobile home parks to commercial and multi - famity uses; and appropriate mix of commercial, office, and multi. family designations. C �a .u, • Request for Proposr •- Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan & En %.mmental Assessment Page 3 Ur�ban�Design: Poor aesthetic q•,ality of older commercial and ress entfal structures; non - conforming lots too small to meet current standards; inconsistency of landscaping and sharp contrast between new development and older structures; architecture which does not promote community identity; unattractive streetscape caused by inconsistent lanoscaping and public improvements; parking /vehicle storage, overhead utilities; parking; b4115oards; and outdoor displays. Traffic and Circulation: Incomplete street improvements with varying avemen. vifdW*,- uncontrolled turning movements and interrupted traffic f:ow caused by numerous driveways; lack of traffic signals v a median island; and balancing the need for access to individual properties white maintaining efficieat traffic flow. Also a factor is strong neighborhood opyosition to additional traffic on adjacent collector streets. (The City is currently undergoing a traffic and circulation study to determine the configuration of the median island and ultimate design of mayor intersections along Foothill Boulevard. Coo,dination of this engineering study and the Specific Plan is necessary). Economic Viabilit : Poor image related to marginal businesses; m t access as a result of the planted me flan and combined driveways; potential impact of implementation strategy un eristing viable businesses; appropriate mix of c(rercial activities; and how to promote stronger economic development or the older areas. IV. SCOPE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES REQUIRED: A. Community Involvement: As mentioned, major emphasis will be g ven to intensive community input. The City maintains an excellent working relationship with the Chamber of Commerce and is very sensitive to citizen involvement. A committee comprised of local business persons, residents and /or City officials may be established to oversee development of the Specific Plan. In addition, varlous groups of property owners will meat to discuss issues concerning related properties or suoareas. The work program must anticipate and reflect this input throughout the planning process by accounting for extensive work sessions and public meetings. The consultant will be responsible to assume a lead role including coordination, presentaticns, and response is comments. In addition, a very close working relationship with City staff is expected. B. Research and Analysis:_ The Consultant shall be responsible for collececr one generation, and analysis of relevant information and graphics necessary to provide a comprehensive and up -to- date description of the Study Area and data base adequate for preparation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Meetings c;)-9/ Request for Propose - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan b Envk nmeatal Assessment Page 4 with various groups, property owners, and City officials will be necessary to achieve a thorough understanding of current and long term issues related to ultimate development of the corridor. C. Refinement of Goals. Objectives and Alternatives: Again, in cooperation w tn various groups, a series of noals and objectives and specific alternatives must be generated by the consultant to provide a basis for land use, technical and design standards, and the inplesantation program. D. Pre aration of the Draft Plan: The Consultant shall be respons a or prepay ng and publishing a draft document which must address, but not be limited to, the following issues: 1. Land Uses /Zoning 2. Subarea Designations 3. Master Planning /Economic Development 4. Technical StanWds 5. Design Guidelines - Architectural Corcects - Site Planning Concepts G. Streetscape Cticepts - Landscape Theme - Entry /Gateway Treatment - Median Island Design - Sidewalk Design - Street Furniture 7. Public Improvements - Roadway C.mfiguration /Right -of -Nay Requirements - Utilities - Street Light'.tg - Flood Contro' /Drainage 8. Implecentation Phasing of Improvements Funding Mechanisms (Public /Private Sector Involvement) E. Preparation of the Environmental Assessment: The consultant s F a respons or preparation o all environmental documentation necessary to comply with the California Environmental Duality Act. The scope of environmental review will be based on the level of potential impacts identified during the planning process. Preparation of a focused EIR may be necessary. F. Preparation of Final Plan and Environmental Assessment: The consuTtint will e responsible for preparation o any rev sions as a result of review and consideration of the document. An original of the final plan and environmental. assessment shall DR13 Request for Pr000se - Foothill Boulevard t Specific Plan It EnJ, .nmwntal Assessment ` Page 5 be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to termination of the project. In addition, all original graphics and mylars of all maps shall be provided to the City. G. Schedule: The final work sche..ule shall be determined with the scope orwork. However, work on the plan is expected to begin within a short time after selection of a consultant. Completion of the plan is anticipated within a twelve -month time frame. V. RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL: Responses to this Request for Proposal shou3d general y bye presented lit the following format: A. Introduction: This section should consist of an introduction To the proposal, and relate the proposed method to the project requirements in a concise manner. B. pualificatlons., The overall capabilities of the Consultant's organization should be discussed to this section. Include a brief summary of the firm's history, its recent related experience, top level manaq--sent and ability of persons assigned to the project to perform the ,:rk, proposed. C Personnel: This section must delineate the experience and /or l5—*EF9—ro—u—nT of the personnel proposed for assignment to the project. An organizational chart showing the name of the project manager and other key personnel should be included. Describe the specific effort to be contribued to the project by each of the key personnel. If consultants, advisors, or subcontractors are used, describe the arrangements and include resumes of the key personnel. 0. Study Hathodolo : The methodology proposed to accomplish the project should b2 fully described in this section. Tae sccp. of cork proposed should be clearly defined, includinc the depth of analysis or research proposed. Also, i-Wncify :he decisions, products, data and corollary information anticipated from City staff or other agencies to ensure successful completion of the contract. The level of assistance required from City staff should be clearly stated. E. Schedule anr' Costs: This section shall contain tie scheduling of the var aT--sTUdles and work items described In the study methodology and shall define both the total and detailed costs In rerforming the total study as wall as its major projects and /or end projects, including a tudget itdicating expenditures for manpower and materials for each wor% item by phases or segments. WIEW .— Request for Proposer - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan & En& onmental Assessment Page 6 F. References: List at least three (3) former clients for wham cocpaT arable services have been performed within the last five (5) years. Include the name, mailing address, and telephone number of each client's principal representative. D. Authorization: The proposal shall be signed by an official au or z o bind the firm and shall contain a statement to the effect that the proposal is valid for ninety (90) days. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will not pay any costs incurred by any firm or persons submitting a proposal in response to this Reqest for Proposal. The City reserves the right to reject, or modify, or cancel, In part or in its entirety, this Reqest for Proposal. All data, documents, and other products used during the study will remain in the public domain upon completion of the project. Similarly, all responses to this Request for Proposal shall became the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will be retained or disposed of accordingly. VI. SELECTION PROCESS: Firms interested in responding to this request —u mus T —seven (7) copies of their proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division, no later than 5:00 p.m., Monday, November 25, 1985. Proposals received after 5:00 p.m. on that date will not be considered. Each proposal will be evaluated by the City based on tie information supplied in the proposal with emphasis on the following ooints: 1. Conciseness and clarity 2. Professional qualifications of the entire study team 3. Understanding of the services required and quality of the proposed research design and work program 4. Level of commitment as exhibited by resource comitment, and the period of performance S. Project costs Please address all proposals and inquiries regarding this Request for Proposal to: Attachments Curt Johnston, Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road P. 0. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, California 9WO Telephone: 714/989 -1661 a�(/ slosh FoR o 00001 aia'�eilc:ij CITY OF rrLNp Foothill Corridor Interim Ftllcles RANCHO CT `AIVIONGA T(U, Study Area Boundary PLANNING DIVLSI N E.UIIOIT, A -1 SCALE, -- -- - Jt t a.n .tavvYo I a O r Poc SEI/4Sta 4 i1SA SW84L n �tl i tl •. n ft�c��cjtr 10"4 Hof ' ON CITY OOF /+��' /� rMI, Foothill Blvd. Sneclfic Plan RANCM CUCAMON�GA TnU, Lot Patterrr, Example PLANNING DIVM%l EXHIBIT- a I SGAID &1.1) F'• IS I Is to 9 u n it n n n n n r • r n a a O/ O O B O 8 0 0 0 0 I O a p p 0 . O O _t ._ i. _ raatraro a L � .11110Yr a.V ® an✓ /Y aCl6 Ml }Yal MYNA rM.. Y Oww• iC BvwbMN 4WJ ON CITY OOF /+��' /� rMI, Foothill Blvd. Sneclfic Plan RANCM CUCAMON�GA TnU, Lot Patterrr, Example PLANNING DIVM%l EXHIBIT- a I SGAID &1.1) F'• IS I Is w k a N FW_ SE V434c -3, IIS,R71l.S$6.8 M c n.MO°c.e.�s ob gpof a1fJ5 n� CITYOFF (TEM, Fothill Blvd, Specifc Plan RANCHO UCAMONGA 'j7'['[E/ Lot Pattern Example PLANNING DIVS)N EYH!BM B -Z SCALD-z-=--P) X99 I a r O 7:3- • •� . / , N Q pY <N 0 O' ... I,r O •O w �uucu - — s •• wur 1 8 F t.p I e © o y/ ' •ae • A- m CITYOFF (TEM, Fothill Blvd, Specifc Plan RANCHO UCAMONGA 'j7'['[E/ Lot Pattern Example PLANNING DIVS)N EYH!BM B -Z SCALD-z-=--P) X99 C antuaa fa nt L OlDtu= or 11¢ Clff mpca. W Ta cfff d RLOM tSt►'mu ADM= LS t=a" u= maul=. I!lmm T3 rartnomra COMA= act =R h M(b) TMAM L 1c M OTLOCISIPM'Y iwrn= ptfltDr"m stlnl>mf m = roon t Comm s L fo.tt.ls (1) its flamlst IMpv t of the otl of C.eee O—aat has ►foe laatsaetad b oeadeas a.1 Ooanlota tha •faothtll malffud Oerldor Gpfaot8111 M 1.m..t far that pwt S,dI i+attei ftma of twat all, Yalta at Qc lra'ae t+ pacer 0f O l oaf ema tha bfata /rfafq W Ib wt MY halts at cut Laomr. 6 sap d.atrlhlad tha Mandarin of aafl Mary arm Ls atU*" h Sta. as kt u M161% •L•. and Is .— Var'at.d bnls 17 thfa nfaranca. iMrftaafU•. SLIT atadl ara. L raCOr•N tam •tha (hathtll Caerldar.• (II) pandls6 tb r aotlao Of Lba Poe' -LM Oartd Stallo It f+ Porapoaasle that damp.% prep.,.. fall M aahatttod for roper *7 sllht. tb (hathtll Iberimr. Ibtaaaer. It L faeaaaa.hle that sam O Iapaaat peopmals onuld ant Omfaf to tb .(flat! spoaltiQ PI. a doeol. {feat fs that A.0 arm am .old eeatrsdlal tb spratfle parpaaa of tha mlftod spa to Vt. (tu) TII1+ tbum11 1s eoveor.ad .boas tha mwtloa cc m ardrrll >m laLmad J alopeaat atr-.. tb Poov.Lu Cwrfda' arra. &a Lmv. to protmt tha letwitl of tha alttata spaame plan aM to asst+ th! mntLaad Cae.lepalat rtalllitl 'tt 1>•1N p vartfM wil=l. tb riW a . thla !Hanel( ftada that It L mer� to mtahlish (.tarts tortes pouctn to U. tha Plfmlm sum tb t1m aaonmrl SO ltsossipb sad f r elate tb apoeirla pI= M daeat<paat fo' t foothill Cant.:. ;ta) In L al p+rrCatlttas p 14ft N tb .depttm of this lled7rmo bar oaeoeraA. A Otdleaace WV. MEREME . R IS O111aI CWIMV S.• to CIS! .sofa W lilt CRS W &A ® runs•.+. V fOU001 SLC'flOS is L all m poets Y aot forth t- 'b Mt.als. fart A. of this Ordtesow S(ttttt 2. lb Clt1 Tamed at tha at1 of ft taamvnp brahl f lsda m FaII c —. a. tb Ctl of was h Nnaap 4 praafs V da'alopl.t + apfetffa Plan of dewlepant far iha r thlll fartdar W.. lb..ltla ta sal of tans plan L I. proat6o • haL+ood arI ..triad plan of deaelpmat alibi. tb Pwthlu fan'1Jm' aad sill alttaull oppa& t aao.min. s tal a ..halal aalfara a penes and plogrtls! loth a --lm aM aelswmdLS the (.stain Coerldert h. Padlnt tb aapl•tim of tha Spaatria Plan. It Is fona.aanla that appllnttms for d•salapa.t tanl" tt.e ra Ntn Iatrtdu' till b reeettal that sal amttWlat tha altiata pals m ml.etlf.a of tb spaelft. plan, and. o. :ia appresl Of adtltlOal aCd1rLlaasr o1M paralta• asrlaaon. WILdlst pw ts. and a atbr amltutU •atlti.aaats far ar Wf L.lat b R-, I attIISa Ib Poet u O.ertdar Om16 remit to m I Uta threat b path, bolth. mf.tl ar "Ifaro K those paaaat W preperilfs stthta a.d smtomtt.t tin foothill Carf6r. e 3, 2: 1 M1e. tip-: y a l ONLr W. na f.6• s Lwmi . TM fellada6 tahrL fm1a6 r•auLtima an t.r•?f adopted, 7•adla6 tM wml.tim aat Laplaamutl¢ cr tM bottul Corridor st.0, all d•nlopa.at HLma tM betalu Clnifr 3"u M ataa,ot•d In aeemdaaoa Y1ta 1M fmtMll Clntder Uteri. %bola. welet an atuWld Lento and tamtpmat•d L ttL 6rdlt u m it •6•a kv appliuttm fm' 4 ... up� .1tus tM botuu Cm'lder Wtm L Leo. Ua t nl" tM WWI& pollal•s adopt49 t•nL L t.r.tl prow /lt•d, stcr m a. Thu Qdlsaa•a to am.w m w iM "nutty of Cal3fineL�.o •�rmm: Coda 3"t1m 65653(1) and Ytall M of m Lrta.r fares and offal [ortl.ltn (45) Can n tM data aC 1M adopttm of tats t1tlM min" eM fill Cmm11 to •rtmd•d tats tidla L tM a.m o u po.Ldad L acid 3"tim 65656(1). SL'Rlaa 51 ID1a OdSSaon IS Mny d"lar.d to M as marvel sraa.a' pYrusM tM to of C.1L'\ c tln.rtv,ot Cods S tlm 65656 .a0 36937 (e) and tats !•.dlaama WWI tab off "t La UlI woe its aroptlas. swan 61 IYlar mall al" tats Oalmo.a W tM C1t7 CUM a 11 u"+ t a Wes pmliaa•d YittL nn (15) dale after its raa."a at law t em• In TM Lt_ 1) f.pm s a ""P of {m"ml oLavLttm po11L1•d L eM CLtf m oats, and alrmiatM fa tM CLt' of 0n:eo CY"o . C"mau. FWW. il/1dTa,. and LaLRm ttto fad dal of mue•r. 1965. LMS 1110'. wma•t. m". mill flri 1161 bon lalOi, boa 11^f3T, / • • LQ •••r17 9 a,, C tl T. UTlt1 A. ADTK=, CLTL C= of 31a MY of %L w moamGSa, C.ufmau. de t•ntl n m t % tM rr• s Ld1 "aa• . utr —1 at a npl" a«tla6 of a 0pam11 of tM C'.l of Loots 1ttp.ap p ML' m tM i dq of mtoen, tidy, aad w flaallT p".m at a r•a.dar w %lad K tae MY Loan Li of tM a f of WY Cap A MLd a tM bd of of oat~. 1935. ft t" W. 3rd du of 0. e ' 1935 at " Ceeaaeo0, CallfanL. f Y.+rll YtMt• \. .Ltf 3a/ FOOTHILL CORRIDOR IN TER IN POLICIES INTRODUCTION The following Goal Statement and Interim Policies are provided to guide the decision making process during preparation of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor Study The oolicl =s address basic land use and urban design issues unique to the Foothill Corridor, and are intended to be applied in conjunction with the Development Code, whichever is more restrictive, unless specifically addressed by these policies. The boundaries of the Study Area include commercial, office, and residential properties along F othill Boulevard, ranging from the west city limit at Grove Avenue to Deer Cn4ek Channel, and from the Devore Freeway to the east .Ity limit at East Avenue (Exhibits A -1, A -2). GOAL STATEMENT Goals define community aspirations and intentions. The following Goal for Foothill Boulevard attempts to synthesize a complex sot of issues dealing with land use, urban design, traffic and circulation, and economic viability Into a comprehensive, understandable and achievable statement. To establish .a high quality, attractive, and unifying design image reflective of cammnity heritage, and provide a viable setting for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access. Based on this goal, the following Interim Policies are provided to address development related issues during preparation of the Foothill Corridor Study. /RP►° -\ 3 0.-:L (.EXHIBIT B V C A. General Reguircrments: Preliminary Review C IRTERTN PGLTCIES A.1 Prior to processing ifevelopmentl8e ! ign Review applications within tir, study area the Planning Commission shall conduct a Preliminary Review to determine consistency with the Interim Goal and Policies contained herein. The trtent is to provide directim. to the applicant and staff' early in the review procese and ovoid undue time delays or expenditures. A.2 Submittal requirements for a Preliminary Review shall include a Site Utilization -tap showing the relationship of the site to surrounding property and improvements a conceptual Site Plan, and a description of the proposed use. Additional information may be requested as deemed necessary by the City Planner. Time Limits /Extensions A.3 eexxceptalsubdivisl subdivision shall lapse eighteen (18) months from the date of approval. The intent is to allow early re- evaluation of projerts not yet constructed for . onsistency with the adcpted Foothill Corridor Study or other then current City standards. A.4 Time extensions for any development to as lap e within of approval may a subect may be granted. In twelve (12) month increments and not to exceed a tot41 of four (4) years from the original date of approval, subjact to any inconsistent provision of State law, and the following findings: a. The proposed land use, project design, and conditions of approval comply with all applicable provisions of the Footnlll Corridor Interim Policies; b. The project is consistent with Oe requireme standards. requirements In effect On time of the extension. .305 Q c. The granting of said time extension will not be detricental to the public health, safety, or we.rare, or materially injurious too properties or improvements in the vicinity. d. Current economic, marketing, and Inventory conditions have made it unreasonable to develop the project prior to this time. Compatibility: A.5 All land use and development proposals shall be compatible with ultimate uses on surrounding properties, particularly residential uses, and mitigate potential conflicts to the extent practical. Mitigation measures may typically include, but are not limited to, Koster Planning, transition of building height, architectural form and density, landscape buffers, sound attenuation, reduction of wind turbulence, visual barriers and /or grading conditions to disnpt line -of- sight concerns, and alterniti;e circulation and access. B. Land Use: The Intent of the following policles is to provide a viable setting for a balanced mixture of residential, commercial, office, and other activities of eomtrunity wide significance compatible with surrounding land uses. General Plan Amendments 0.1 Applications for General Plan nand Use Amendments are discouraged. Prior to approval of any such eoendment, however, the Planning Comission shall make the following findings: a. The proposed amendment is clearly consistent with the intent and purpose of the interim policies for the foothill Boulevard corridor. b The proposed land use is compatible with ultimate uses on surrounding property. Tne proposed land use will not create significant traffic or circulation impacts. 3aS i t � d. The proposed land nse will mt be detrimental to iroperties or improvecdnts in the ficinity. Development Districts Amendments B.2 Development District Amendments boundaries may be considered if consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and Interim Policies, and where necessary to achieve more logical and efficient land t.ee and site planning patterns. The :gtent is to allow flexibility during the Master Planning process and provide a to:' to achieve the objectives of the Interim Policies. Land Use B.3 Current Land Use regulations within the Study Area shall remain in effect, except that the following limitations shall apply during preparation of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor Plan. The purpose is to avoid land uses which may have adverse aesthetic impacts, until such time as design guidelines and technical standards are established to deal with specific areas of concern. A complete list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses is provided on the attached Interim Use Regulations for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Existing or previously approved businesses and buildings shall be allowed to continue under current regulatory provisions of the City. The following new land uses shall not be established in 'tile Office /Professional and General Commercial Districts within the Study Ares. Expansion o' existing uses identified below shall be allowed subject to the provisions of the Interim Policies for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and Development Code Standards. Animal Care Facility with exterior kennels, pens, o:• runs Cemeteries - contractors Yards 3r- C - Equipment Rental Yards - Ice Nacbines (outdoor) - enrol- storage for public use Recreation Vehicle Storage Yard - Vehicular Storage Yards The following now land uses may be rstablishad in the Office /Profess tonal or General Commercial Districts within the Study Area see attached interim Use Anniations , subject to the approval of a Cohditionat Use Pareit. Carpenter Shop or Cabinet %op Stores and Pharmacies i6# in OP District only) Nurseries i Garden Suppl) Stores Plumbing Shop and Supplies Second Band Stores and Pawn Shops • Spiritualists C. Master Planned Developments The purpose of this section is to provide for integrated developetnt at fhe earliest possible time in the review process. Nester planning of defined areas will avoid development of single parcels of land in a mercer which prevents or pre: Ludes future development of adjacent parcals in the best way feasible. The specific intent is to recognise and solve problems before they occur and take advantage of opportunities while they exist. Nester Plans Required CA A conceptual Plaster Plan shalt be Commission review in conjunction Planning ith development proposals wherever necessary to assure integrated developmmit, enhance harmonious and orderly deenlopment, mitigate site constraints oa adjolntng property and maxiairn land potential. BoundariesiCity Benefit C.2 The area of Nester Plans shall not be confined by Individual lot lines, but w.A detcrmined by logical vvlaening ,fin boundaries and site coaditlens as _ i� required by the Planning Commission or City Planner. Plaster Planning beyond .!, 3a 7 °n= C C the boundaries of specific project _ sites 1s intended to benefit the city by coordinating land use and site planning to enhance opportunities for Quality development consistent with the standards for .'oothill Boulevard, de- emphasize 'strip -c mmercial• by creating organized groups of structures and uses, and provide for efficient utilization of land. Content C.3 At a minimum, Master Plans shall Indicate conceptual building locations and orientation, overall circulation, points of ingress and egress, parking lot layouts, transit stops, landscaped areas, and pedestrian nodes, and circulation. In addition, the city Planner may require other information as deemed necessary to assure consistency with the intent of these policies. D. New Development: The intent of the following policies is to establish a high quality, attractin: and unifyin design image which promotes a sense of identity and reflects community heritage and to provide for safe and efficient traffic flow and optimum vehicular and pede.'.ian access within the corridor. Architecture ir.I The architecture of new construction shall be sensitive to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga and relate to f.earby structures of community significance. Design elements may include, but are not limited to, river rock /fieldstone walls, exposed beamwork, vine arbors, carved parapet walls, and covered walkways or arcades. 0.2 All applications for new development within the study area shall include a written statement of architectural intent indicating how the project is sensitive to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga. Pedestrian Orientation 0.3 Site planning, including building orientation and parking lot configuration, shall enhance pedestrian c,,nnections on- and off -site. A continuous pedestrian system is required in all new projects with connections between buildings, parking 369 areas, street adjacent sidewalks and transit stops. Amenities shall be provided such as plazas, shaded seating alcoves, expanded walkways with surface treatment, texturized pavement across drive aisles, raised planters, trash receptacles, and drinking fountains. In addition, outdoor eating areas are encouraged. Combined Access D.4 Through the master planning process, driveways onto Foothill Boulevard shall be coordinated 'or consistency with existing City access policies (i.e.. 300' dr,veway separation) to the extent practical, regardless of parcel width. Public Transit 0.5 Public transit tacilities shall be considered within all master 'ans. Convenient pedestrian access slip 1 be provided from designated tr islt facilities, such as bus stops. Streetscape Design 0.6 Streetscape design alements for all new proiects shall be coordinated for consistency with tie guidelines for Foothill Boulevard in effect at the time of development, including intensified landscap:ng with specimen size trees, terming, and meandering sidewalks. Ir. addition, street furniture and alluvial ro- kscape and monument signs may be required where Landscaping 0.7 '.andsraping shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the Streetscape, enhance building architecture, buffer views of automobiles, screen utilities and service areas, and distinguish pedestrian spaces from vehicular areas. E. Non - Conforming Lots /Structures: The purpose of this section 1s to allow continuance of existing uses and buildings under current conditions, and promote consistency of design and technical standards throughout the :Ludy area at the time of development, conversion, or redesign. Master Planning E.1 New development and /or conversion of existing residential buildings to a new use is permitted on non- conforming lots, provided such development is an 349 integral part of a Master Plai development consistent with the Interim Pe.l Hes for the Foothill Boulevard :orridor and Development Code standards. The boundaries of such a haster Plan shall be determined by the City Pla,,ner per policy C.2 above, and should provide for consolidation of substandard parcels. Landscaping E.2 Regardless of parcel depth, all new development shall provide a minimum 45' building setback and average streetscape landscaping (measured from the ultimate curb face location) on Foothill Boulevard. E.3 Streetscape landscaping and irrigation shall be required to the extent practical in conjunction with sebstantial reconstruction, renovation or exterior remodeling of existing structures along Foothill Boulevard involving the issuance of a building Vermit. t Development Code Interim Use Reeulst'om — Foothill Boulevard C dor Study Area Uses listed In this Table shall be allowable in one or more of the ,,mmerclal districts as Indicated In the columns beneath each commercial district. Where Indicated with the letter "P ", the use shall be a permitted use In that district. Where Indicated with the letter "C ", the use shall be a conditiorsl use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use In one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. INITE M 115E REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAWOPFICE DISTRICTS 7. Public bulldi (library, p P P nga ry, city end county buildings, special districts and post 8. Public utility service offices. p P p 9. Public safety facility (police, fire, C C C ambulance and paramedics). 3/,) USE OP HC CC A. Offices and Related Uses 1. Administrat ;vo and executive offices. P P P 2. Artist and photographic studios, rot P P p including the sale of equipment or supplies. 0. Clerical and professional offices, p P p 4. Financial services and instltutlov. P p P S, Medical, dental and related health P p P services (Pon- animal related) including laboratories and clinics; only the sale of articles clearly Incidental to the services provided shall be permitted. 0. Preact.,.tion pharmacies, (alto when P P P located within a building containing the Offices of S or mere medical practitioners) 7. Public bulldi (library, p P P nga ry, city end county buildings, special districts and post 8. Public utility service offices. p P p 9. Public safety facility (police, fire, C C C ambulance and paramedics). 3/,) t1SR ERIIt USE REGULATIONS Or NO GC 10. Refuted commercial uses (blueprinting, -Pp stahon.uy, quick copy, etc.) when incidental to an office building or c ,mptcx. B. General Commercial Uses 1. Antique shops _ p 2. Adult .siness (see special requirements per Section 17.10.030) 3. Anima, Care Facility (animal hospital, veterinarian, commercial kennel, grooming). a. Excluding exterior kennel, pens, or C p runs. b. Including exterior kennel, pens, or runs. 4. Apparel stores. _ p S. Art, music and photographic studios and C p supply stores. 6. Appliance stores and repair. _ r 7. Arcades (sea special requirements per - C Section 1'.10.030 F.) 8. Athletiv and Health Club, gyms and p p weight reducing elmlcs. 9. Automotive services (Including motorcycles, boats, trailer and camper) a. sates (may have repairs as ancilary C _ use) b. rentals c. repairs (major engine work, muffler _ shops, painting, body work and upholstery) d. Coln -op washing C C e. Automatic washing C C • Denotes change from Table 17.10.030 of the Oevelopmeat Code 3103 r p C p p p p C p C C C C C 3� i INTERM IISE REMLATIONS USE OP NC GC (f) Service or gasoline disp -3ing C C P stations (Including minor repair such as tune -ups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers) (g) Parts and suppile• P P 10. Bakeries (retail only). P P 11. Berber and beauty shops. P P P P P 12. Bicycle shops. P P P 13. Blueprint and photocopy services 14. _ Boat and camper sales and service. - C 15. Book, gift and stationary stores (other C P P than adult related material). 16. _ Candy storm and confectioneries. P P _ - P 17. Catering establishments. 18. Cleaaing and pressing establishments. C P P Is. Carpenter shop or cabinet shop. ' 20. tavern) including related entertainment. (e) Operated independent of a C _ C restaurant (b) Accessor, to a restaurart C C C 21. Commercial recreation facilities. (a) Indoo, uses such as bowling, C C P theaters, blalards, (b) Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, C C C basketball, baseball trampolines, etc. 22. Contractor yards (scraening of outdoor ' -� storage required). - P P 23. Dairy product stores. 3� r ,y. r T• INTERIM USE REGUTATIOKS USE OP HC CC 24. Departmerat stores. - - P 25. Drive -in businesses, Including theaters. - C C (other tnan fast food restaurants) 26. Drug stores and pharmacies. C * p p 27. Equipment rental yards. 28. Fast -food restaurants. C C P 29. Feed/Tack stones - C p 30. Florist shops. P P p 31. Food stores and supermarkets. - P P 32. Furniture stores, repair and upholstery. - P P 33. General retail stores. - F P 34. Hardware stores. - P P 35. Home improvement centers. (a) Material stored and sold within - P P enclosed buildings (b) Outdoor storage of material such as - - C lumber k building materials 36. Hotels and Motels. C - P 37. tee Machines (outdoor). - -• -+ 38. Jenitoral services and supplles. C p P 39. Jeweirj stores. - P P 40. Laundry self -sere ca. - P p 41. Liquor stores. - p P 42. Kiosks for vey shops, film drops, etc. in - C C perking tots. 43. Locksmith shop. - P p 44. Mint- storage ter public use (no outdoor _ _+ ir storage). yti 3�s �S � ` 1NTER14 JSE OEGULiTI0X5 USE CP AC W 45. Mortuaries • C C C ` 46. 3lotare7de ales and service. C F 47. Newspaper and magarine :pores, pnntim - C P and PWLLs - t 46. Numerics and garden Provided. in the NC dcUict, n - L • C ' egtnipment. supplies and material art Inept within an enclosed area. 49. Office and business mar Wm story_ C P P So. Pertdot faeiRtim (e mmerdW where fees C - P y are charge& e i51. PoUUeai or phIlInthropic beadqum"em C C P 52. Pet shop. _ p P 53. PluatSing shop and sapprUes. G 5t. Photocopy P P P 55. Printer shops. _ _ p 56. Restaurants (ot)ttr then fist food). n W With en.ertaiomai and/or serving C C P Of aleotwiic beverages 2) Incidental serving of beer and wine P P P but without a Cocktail k4m ;q bar, entertAUcwmt R dendng 57. Recmtimd Vehicle St=" Yard. +8. Shoe store; sales and repair. - P P 59. Scco.- .d-hand stores and pawn shops. - a C. 60. Supping Center subject to provid" in - C Section 17.10.030 -r 5. C •:. 6l, reaSugs or astrology forecasting- _ _ CO 62- SPortuq goods stores. - P P 63. Stamp and coin shops. _ p p ■ w C INTERIM USE REGULATIONS 317 USE OF NC GC ` 64. Swimming pcol supplies. _ P p 65. Tailor. P P 66. Taxidermists. _ : • P 67. Television, radio sales and service. _ P P 68. Tire sales and service. _ _ L 69. Toy stares. - P P 70. Towirg service (wlthOO vehicular storage) • - _ C 71. Travel agencies. P P P 74. Tray °�• :•��. on facilities (train and bus, C C C taxi dev .! 77. Truck and trailer rental, sales and service. - _ C 74. Variety stores - P P D. Public and semi-public uses i 1. Do, care Facilities C C C 2. Coalescent facllitic; and hospitals. C ,1 - C J. Private and public clubs and lodges, Including YMCA, YWCA and similar C C C youth group uses. 1. Educatioma Institutions n Institutions, C C , (including colleges aid C S. Libraries dt museums, public or private. C C C 8. Parks and recreation facilities, public or C C private. C s a 7. P'ib!'- utility installations. C C C 8. Vocational or butinesa trade schools. C C C 9. Churches, convents, monasteries and other .ti religious Institutions. C C C 317 INTERIM USE REGUU%TIONS USE OP HC CC D. Accessory Uses 1. Acessory structures and uses customarily P P P Incidental to a permitted use and contained on the sama site. 2. Accessory structures and us— customarily C C; C Incidents) to a condi'lonal use and contained cn the sane site. 1. Caretakers residence C C P 4. Amusement Dsvlces, per Section - P P 17.10.030 -P. E. Temoorary Uses 1. Temporary uses as prescribed In Section P P P 17.04.070 and subject to those provisions. 2. Temporary office modules, subject to C C C provisions in Section 17.10.030 -P.4. r S. - �4 `•QSI'1 EXHIBIT B 2.0 t3 IMNITY INVOI. MM Crucial to the Specific plan Ia S1x=s will be the dncfafen -o king framewhic which policies can be crnaistently applied &sing the dnelcpmnt Of the specific plain. It is critical that the City's td Hoc fkmaittee, Sib-area O=aunity meetings alcrg with Plarudn7 Qanlssion and City anmcil meetings - be 2idtinteh early to provide basic direction and, parallel to the technical part of the study, a frmaork of conclusiaw and reemmodatiens. (Sea attached chart) The Ad flee C- toe will assist in the evaluation of the goala - electives of the specific plan through thm study pooess. The crosultart team will draft Lzitiai art]Snes for the tom thee. In addition, every miiestona of the ab-ly effort (ace schedule? will be a point at %h(ch the ft $fttee, the Planning Ommiasion mnl Clty Council will review and cwmant on draft products and give feu&wk for tlhe nex phwe. We will writ closely with City Staff as a direct resource in the planning process. Wa wtll arrange regular meetings for paonsatattm of ea work and to confirm the accuracy of conclusions. Once w haw feeulatod a final strategy for each phase of the paoceas, it will be .chanted for staff rppruval prior to proceeding in an aggressive ranrrs. 2.0.A PAOWC19n 2.0.1 B1 ]c1Y mcstinns with staff - regular updatw a Status Moor t9. .R, 3 rs _ ^-n .v s 2.0.3 A minimum of eight public workshops with Ad .lee ttee - d, l'D 9 ehn 1. Identify issues Input from Bub Arun Meetings M STUM.TXf Page 1 03/13/86 157/05.000 3/9 H 51m'Ql.77Q' pages 2 03/13186 157/05.000 Sao 2. Paview, 'O'M InfmratLon/Preliminary C, 9jb Area 3. Feview Goal .. 0 sub Aram 0 preview .. S. Premntatir� CC PreferTrd Alternative .. to .. 0 M-1 issues 6. lk-yiew Draft Plan pl-wmtc Review 7. ... (As neellan � m 2.0.5 with interest ,_ as .. :--mot : �' --�- `: 1 L otnerg 251. H 51m'Ql.77Q' pages 2 03/13186 157/05.000 Sao 2.0.8 Wngfftan_ will be responsible for mim&zs 2-0.9 h?aesaltmnt will pteseht 15 workino binders for Starr a= An hoc uic eltm .is la e� cis ted by Staff. Rummm��� 4he research and analysis pbaso will identify tin regSmal infl and the plc. 1m Use, ctrl, and public policy setting within hdhich the lbotiL Bwlevard Spee-fic plan will be preFered. 'Mm R mssch and Analysis Beport will idrntifys 11 SLSIDMM= page 3 CIJ111106 157/05.000 .,-30/ 2.1.2 O pile baseline material necessary to umierstand Arai development issues, and market ceepetition, and the context within which development will occur. 2.1.3 rxizq g/Planmed lard Uses and Pareeliraticn. Utilizing current data from the San Bernardino County Assessor, a base map identifying existing parcels within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area will be prepared. this base top will identify parcels b/ size and frontage. The base will ba tuzePared ¢t 1 inch to 100 eat an a aer A parcel - specific lend use imp will Own be prepared utilizing the SIC or SLAG classification system. Acreages for each lard use will be tabulated, along with oquare footage calculations for key economic generators. An itwentory of vacant parcels will also be prepared identifying site location, size, slope fm*ago, surrounding lard uses, and otbar constraints /oppartunitieA. 'Ur parcel - specific mega will be eaczpntible with tho City's lard inventory m mdtxing p¢ogrmm bong developed with the County. Tabulation via a Lotus 1 -2 -3 electronic worksheet will allow City staff to re¢diry update this inventory as Lunges cecs. 2.1.4 lord WnershiP amershlp patterns within the specific plan area will be identified and mapped. 2.1.5 AE4 Analysis Field recamvaissence will biuntify significant visual features of the shay area. A field survey Loam UsS! both ,oZ lar — and destriann = ff2 evaa uaiansI 11 identify urc 0, trans Iticm, and conflicts. Concurrently, a pliotographic essay of these features will be prepared. H SILWM.T= Page 4 07/13/66 157/05.000 3� 2.1.6 Architectural/Site Analysis >. � «su ti z- z 2.1.7 Wetim and Planned Public Facilities Meetings will be held with each public agency providin7 utilities, facilities, or services to the project area. Thsso meetings will explore each agency's ability to servics the specific plan area, as well as their require- ments for new facilities. All major existing and pl=*ed infrastructure elements will be illustrated. 2.1.8 Rey Nodes end Transition Areas Based on present co ditions and future demands, key physical nodes aryl transition. arras within the Foothill Bouletard area will be identified. M STUDM.Txr page i 07/13/86 157/05.000 3;)3 2.1.9 Baseline Fconcmic Analysis Rhin teak will clearly identify current and projected market conditions uttich define the major retail, officer gwwrnl camercial, and residential developrnt opporhmities appropriate to the Tbothill Boulevard Cbrridor. This understanding is critical in identifying the lesired mix of feasible land uses within the Specific Plan area. Data will be obtained through a ombination of field surveys --I Secondary data. Iceal economic development data to be analyzed includes: local and Sbbregiona) _fr:avmic Baset • major employment Sources; • retail performance analysis; and • current retail leakages and sectortal strengths. c Profile of Consumer st.^engtht 0 reptlaticn treds at c®amity and sibregiahal levels; 0 household characteristics (size, age, mix, income and psrc asing pacer); and o housing absorption estimates. - Bcoamtric Model of Future retail Potential: 0 1985 /86 conditions; and 0 two future horizon dates (e.g., 1990 and 2000). FLiphasia will be given to contemporary market conditions and potential uses tbidt offer the stronpst fiscal benefit to rancho ntcaonga, and serve as anchors for c=wrcial nodes. 14 STVDYM.Ta Page 6 03/13/86 157/05.000 3a�4 .4 Retail sates leakages and net inflows will indicate dcvel4ment opportunities wader present market conditions. Retail sales data for 1984 -1985 from the State Board of r..luali- zation and t1v: demand model prepared by the Omsultant lbss will identiry leakages for such ksy factors as general merchare'se out- lets, have 9anlshings stores, and a. n deal- ers, as ell as other retail /servien sectors. Dollar valve) then will be translated into square fx- ;e and acreage potentials using verio s captare rate asmupt rna, 2.1.10 Dnvirormeit Setting An emvirvsental baseline repot: will be prepared as part of the iesaardn and Analysis l�port. 'ittis will identify enviroimental factors not addressed in other tasks, includ- ing drainage patterns and ousting /planned facilities, 60SIH Bid geologic conditions, raise corditims, air quality, bletic re- sources, and traffic conditions, based on the MM Traffic Study Model for Foothill Boulevard. 2.1.11 Ctapilat:iw=u'Synthesis • n. N S MMMM Pager 7 03/13/86 157/05.000 3aS - areas atulch `rO r'vq l tly have mall, narrow we the cppert%=tY Lor mC FwTua ted into larger, morn ocyclopable party r - existlra historical, arch! the and eaturrs W for QQatin7 area am moarra design tne9es - ecor&mc deve1cpessnt opportunities. Potential strategies will to identified to Capitalize on cpport unities, minimize cor1 attrainte, and resolve area icsm3; evaluate deairabno land use mixes for do study area bawl on the pareelization patterns, existing land ``u -ses, adntingg general plan designations, and yp baseline eC� an..lysis. Synthesize the above tasks into a screen- check research and A:alysia Report. This report , will bo suteittod to the City for revive and cccr nt. city cdmmts on the scmmd=k cc1y will be inmxparated into the docnrant, and copies will be delivered to the City. PFnODCrn P4seareh and Anal ais ne ort Includinq Tome Mcabers ]involved /Percentage Involved: Rick /151, Lloyd Zola/20t, Bay Yang /20t, Darrel. Plem ng /St, and all tbrking Meabrss 140t 7.2 GDA S /OBJECTIVES After evaluating the information in the Research and Analysis Phase, a series of gilding goals and objectives will be drafted for 'ovelopeent. of the ultimate Specific Plan sensitive to General Plan goals and objectives for the Specific Plan area. 7hess Obals /Objectives will, at mbubam, add<css the d following isauesr - Significant historical/crltural features 'o • - lhviromental features v " M :.=VW...Txr Page 8 03/11/86 157/05.000 3� - thb.n design features - Desirable sit-- characteristics for various land uses - Appropriate internal land use relationships - Buffer /transition areas - Ciroulation/traffic features - Capital improvement reTArmrsts 2.2.A PFM=: 2.2.1 - Draft Coals statement 2.2.2 - Ddbaraa accessory coals as rtecessu 2.2.3 - Maxlmm of too revisions to statement statt as ttee. 'MSc Marbers Imnlvedfrementage Involved: Rid: Cane: /251, Van Stephrns /10t, Llold 2ola/1010 Paul Flbarda /2S1, Frank Drenlmen/10t, and all working mwbe=r 201. 2.3 BCMRDIIC tlT'VF. DPUC GWtS /CWMTrm rte goals and objectives for eas�amic development must be responsive to: - CMMV dty goals outlined in the General Pln - resident and business em=rts constraints - �IfiCper objectives This crucial -economic blueprint' for the Foothill Boulevard tbrridor will Ief �, rat Mr r wt an Debar cmpetitive with, the po regional commercial projects. priCrirt t„g goals and objectives a nstitute the first major cot vitY in paring the Doxxmic DereICPMCnt Strategy Thus begins with a potential list based on three factors: - Results of tie Baseline Analysis - Fevicw of t]arent City Pcdle -les - Wwking 0=,At -tea and aub-area 0== dtY T--put M SUM= page 9 0S/13/86 157/05.000 3a2 The connmdltants will use the market fi dimn from the Research and Ardalysis Fhaso and a review of policy deciaions made by the Planning O missim/Qxmcil Over the past three years to formulate a Coals /Adjectives List. This id11 be presented to the Warking Qmaittee and to City Staff for pri:drity ranking. Lynthesis of respatives will yield the goals and objectives which will be presented to business interests and residents thrugd a series of Working Wmmitteo " sub.ema Qxmmity wrkebops. The tdorksbops will generate consenw a:d c promise Qd ch the Qxrvultant team will use to pro$nos a eat of ibrking Qmis and Adjectives. PHw=: Coals /abjeeti%e An=-t - tend Use - Emnnmlaal CavolcFmnt Tbem Fiam m Involved/lvucedtago Involved: Rick Cars /151, Van Stephens /51, Paul Idwards /15/1, Ray Yang /401, Frank Drcdmmn/101, and all inking maters 151 _A IA:OI USE ALTEF A71VES Resod on the working goals /objectives, two lend use plan alternatives will be prepared uridiZi„e the following key factors: - Identified specific plan and strategics — p"ical Parameters - Mi:¢nborhood identity Influerx on serrcading naighbratnols capital impuoveUmts Economics /marketing &)b-area issues ruch as: Rirtoriral /Qnldmnral: S .mmoa Inn Ha is Leap 7horas mouser, winery Virgirma :dare Lenten tkv Ltrvalepm. -+t Ames: V to Hallman G..®f.V, tits c �P. and Pepwtr ='3'81 Mixed Dmmlopeait Areas: Grow to S.P. Tracks told ana Mw? diems Kia=to center 1-15 Foy. to Fast AM. M SIVDYM,7Xr Page 10 03/13/85 157 /05.000 3a8 Analysis of land-use alternatives will f cus an those portions likely to be affected by either a current external /intarral influence or a future factor pro tS by probable gzwth decisions. Cur approach will to to test planning coramptr in response to economic, an:athetic, engineering, and annironnental criteria. 2.4.A PFCU=: 2.4.1 wo alternative land use Plana. 2.4.2 Om m6ditirral preferred Alternative Plan if requarm 2.4.3 Plans presented by sut•area as n cessarv. 1Lvam Msbers LrvolieaT-ercentage .molve3: Rick Ol7ocr /351, Van Sbephem /101, Paul DNards /151, Prank MwJ=an/1Ci aid all wuC--ea mete s /301 2.5 IQOi4N D SIM ALTER JT4M dwo urban design alternatives will be developed for the Fbothil: Oorridor to facilit %te the City's policy for Fbothill Boulevard as a major comity thoroughfare of la dirk public identity. The ntent is to dewlap an urban design plan that is both ;comachtive and unique to Rancho Cuammonga to ill:stiato the exciting potential of the area to the c®mity and developers. The style must be reflective ^f an active area with many axtti:g eape- rlerm for the resident and visitor. Our work will be be paota t these values and allow for Jndividual creative o:lutionv in the oonbext of a well plarn+d urban design prng:ar. 'the objective is to give direction to all Oiystcal impcourammts that hZfect the eetting. This effort will irclule to follcuingr 2.5.1 The beginning ection lrograa to analyze Um study -rem is rgnesented by urban design •visions' of All those involved. The problem that have been apparent will only be solved by actions from those who see t * need, Potential, aM ability to inprove Luaus oa ditia:s. These people aced to be taught forth and Leaned on the task of future thinking for the variau sab- areaa. finis is am firs, target -- the first step in the process. M SrJM.7Xf page 11 03113186 157/05.000 6� TO set the context of stotj for all partici- pants, wo propcse to initiate an intense surrey of attibAea, physical conditions, aN r=trol- lFng factors. 'Iln offo. -t will cnnta --t virt%LV-ly every segment of tie participants within the study area. ]M specific objective for this firs step is to establish priority issues to be rear v-d, and to open study for Snpot no as to not c 1c,* any 3npartm+�acta¢s. Me success of this first effort will be aependcnt on parfa mu= within a short time fxa:m. Tho balance of tie urban design proeeas cannot effectively be productive until all members of the Ad trot 0assittee and Sub -area participants are aware of the key Issues. The products of this initial effort will curtain the following ciaractrristicm 1. Cb ective essesmant techniques 2.- urn searching far special opport ni-y axe" 3. Bnt:asis on ranking priorities 4. localized eocial-e:zv:aa c perspective S. Olydera o current public li 6. Full range of those or imago aaternat ves The tedutiques used to perform this function of setting Ws framework will Include: 1. Focus individual interviews 2. Moto and video donmentation 3 Continual public b1put/F*(&ack 4. Stag graphics 5. Flniti- disciplinary teas input public agency participation Thc-ae techniques will focus on the td Hoc Ommittee cry oxmnieating the iaaxn to be addressed, and stressing the importance of this Initial phase. 2.5.2 Analysis of The Study Area Tin urban design analysis of the project area .:ill be p arfoaed under the following outline. Fhphasis trill be placed on generating info= - aticn on a continual basis for ccns*ant updating of b:e Ad Hoc Cmanrttee and Staff. H S''LIDyH.a M Page t2 03/1_/86 157/05.000 1. Dzsciptim of study wide and sub -area boundaries 2. tmgiaal economy 3. "atural features 4. PLrrrsiade features S. History/oAturs 6. Transportation 7. lolit:ical organization Sub-Area, Conbex i 1. tend use 2. Circulation 3. Strectaeape 4. visual resources Social Context: 1. Population patterns 2. Activity patterns 3. Institution 4. circulation - origin :7d destination 5. 0.xr patterns traditiars Opportunities wA Gola�-.aintsi 1. conflicts 2. Transitions 3. Barriers 4. Deteriorated and blighted areas S. mixed uses 6. Inccapadhilities 7. Views 8. natural features 9. Onnership /ut pattern Definition of thban Design Coals and Vea: 1. Felationship of urban and natural features 2. preservntlnn of historical character 3. D+valoPm.nt of identity and a sense of place through a cohesive design them 4. P_eservation and creation of foal points 5. cot ha ?ishwent of gateway entries 6. baprovenent of vlsoal environment 7. Rr3mlopmrsnt of deteriorated arras 8. Eliminate anIIicting land uses 9. Separation of traffic %&= possible 10. Integrity of established neighborhoods 11. Variety of height, mess, texture and color with consideration to continuity P. Review grrcent those Desion/bevelorrent Po ess The sbvdy team will dWA a fonaal assess - ment of all current Or'.mn Design Policies. The expertise of the various professionals will provide direct design solutions. The panel of teas members will bring their specific individual understanding of urban devolopnant to an evaluation vimim cp with the Ad Fbc Ooemittee. 7he results of this meeting will result in a report on each key City policy. Our approach in this assesmant will have the following characteriuti`st 1. Design observatias will be perfomcd to assure that 'qualified* statements are produced. Our temmnsaabess are eery astute in dewlcpmnnt in this area and can be provided the critical nerds of successful deielcparat in term of econaaic, physical and social res;ities. 2. Our objective will be to identify the followings - Fbatures of adopted policies u%ich have guided design along the Foothill &xdevard Ccrridor. - Policies open to design interpretations. - Itei tolerances for design solutions. - Parmecters for design guidelines. - Overriding design conclusions cr steering policies. 03/1SiLAx mm Page 14 357/05.000 n 33�- Consttertng poli -im affactlfg design. 3. He will rer, a.tual ersnplw related to our cbselvetlon 4. t9e will categorUe cw- exclusions Jaw a format: that will gemit Orderly ssspmse fam the M we Osmittee. S. All Other Ohoavaticss will be refer- to each Other in Order to aa- mnnnirate thdr interrelationships. G. Hralmate Ciranlatiai Features: Based cc annx+mI plans and poli^Ses, we will review the IDAti— taeeted circulation aystm is tiro study area, foaming on the follaving l...en sS 1. street sore faro building face to banding face. 2. redcetriao !reds and specific pcdalm area; _ including new scvasmt cor=m. ` 3. Puking eases and ability to serve ` 4. Hight- cf-way requirements for traf- fic control devices and vet rr+ilar/ pedestrian syytm Mwagmmt LCIPIODYMents- x 5. Creating amfe and attractive pedes- trian access to ;amities. 2.5.3 Vrbm Dwi9voo ctaiity strategy Plan After the arsalts of Stn p M o have been absoib- al, the process will start to develop a Plan" t eo]alSo ne/e- * piques fu improving hae co dittoes is the study area. 7bO Plan vill. irneladeu A. (kmamitY Sral�en 1. Signlfi¢at Fffitnaal Featrm 2. Cistuletdm Patteta M MUM= Page 15 0.1113186 157/05.000 .333 3. Activity Oettcrs 4. -Open Spacer Park/Public Facilities 5. Streetscape 6. Historical Beildin49 7. Laninirks B. land Uses 9. Activity lodes 10. Social Coals 11. Architectural Stylei 12. landscape gums 13. Major Entries and B3ges B. Sub -Area Scale3 1. Maste.^ Planing 2. Street Coniiguraticn 3. Streetscapo Character 4. Focal Elements S. Street FLmiture 6. Arddteebuml Deaign: a. Style b. Maes/Form c. Color d. Material e. Text= 7. Open Space C. Developrent Strategies: 1. Activities Areast a. Hesi(Urtdal b. Cocrercial c. ]Ydustrial d. lnstitutiaul e. (pet Spac e/Beseation 2. Circulation a. doutet 1) Auto 2) Transit 3) Pedestrian 4) Bike b. Entries C. Gateway M Snmm.TXT Page 16 03/13/86 157/05.000 33y 3. Streetscapa a. Street Furniture b. Paving C. Setback d. Lighting /Signing e. Parking f. Entries g. Street Trees h. Median 1. Sidevralk (straight/meandering) <. Visual Features a. Natural b. Tbpographic c. Skyline Features, including overhead utilities and hill d. view oorrid= e. Ian mrk 5. Activity District, Canters and Nodes (Sub- Arens) a. Omfmreial b. Residential C. HistoricallcUttral 6. Ardtitecbrral Character a. Height of Structure b, Bulk/Kiss C. Building Coverage d. style e. Material f. Texture 7. landscaping a. Tame /Concept b. Character C. Street Treat -ents d. Entry Gateways e. Odges f. Transitions g. Scxeen/Buffare h. Skyline M STUDYM.7Xf Page 17 03/13/86 157/05.090 33S 2.5.4 Urban Design Widelines Once the Urban Design Plan has been accepted as a positive direction to proceed, specific provisions most be foam dated to represent the n:eetled actions and effectuate the design strategies. The provi- sions will be in the form of design details, alter- native forms, and /or guidalines for implementation focused on, but not limited to the followi+q Urban Design Provisions: A. Visua`ZuslitV aod Urb.:.t --nagat 1. Urban Design Principles 2. Visual duality /Image Provisions B. Height and Bulk of Boildinge: 1. Urban Design Principles 2. Method used for /bamwing Height, Bulk sid scale 3. Specific Criteria Oardinatfon in the location of Tall &:ildings 4. Peight and bulk Provisions S. Shade, Reflected rAght and Wed Criteria Considerations C. Streets and Pedestrian Systems: 1. Residential Str =rts and Pedestrian Systems: a. Design Prototypes b. Design Alternatives 2. Cccrrarcial Streets and Pedestrian Systarot a. Street rendscaping b. Street ldghting C. Intersection Design d. Street fluniture o. Plaza Design D. Views and Streetscape Systems: 1. Vice Provisions 2. Streetscape ProviLium H S14VM.Txr Page 16 07/13186 157/05.000 3.3 E. Cpen Spaca and Landscaping 1. Visual/Urban Design FUnction for Open Space and landscaping 2. PecreatloraVurban comign Functions of Open Spam and Landscaping 2.5.5 Implranntation Methods Ito final step will be the review and refinement of iaplcmenration ted=iq es for the future action programs. In addition to the Specific Plan lend Use Action Prcgrmm, all existing and potentially future methods will be surveyed: A. Existing Implementation Prmmnt 1. General Plan 2. Deve t Qxlo 3. c P 4. Near luau t Plans 5. Fw tm! + —tmmss tt Pima 6. Design HeV v Provisions B. Future Urban Deaign 1h,,�lmientation Dednni tes 71tC�M a not m to: 1. Historical /Cultural Districts 2. Pe nranco 3. ve 4. Muter P S. Deve at ellnoa o. Deve t to 7 Wans er o 1Dev ant n is 9mld i 8 �E feguirments 2.5.6 PFnDOCr 2.5.6.1 awe (2) Alternative Urban Desigl Plans. 2.5.6.2 Cie (1) Additional Urban Design Plan if roquired. M STUDYH.'DC Paga 19 0'3/13/86 157/05.000 ,3 3 7 2.5.6.3 Plans presented by subarea if necessary 1Mm Wffbers Involved/Percentago Involved: Pick Gams /201, van Stephens /151, Rick Hum /151, Gene 11sirh/151, Frank Orectman/101, and all %;arkirg members /251 2.6 PERF ERR D IND WE NO EMB M DFSIGti PIAH Baud on the Research/Analysis report, the refired goals and objectives and direction from the Working Ca ftbea, we will prepare one lad use and urban design plan. A clear set of criteria to assist in the selection of the pne- fazrod plan will be prepired and submitted to the City for review and cement. This will assure understanding of important issues, and how the plan addresses those issues. 7 he process will be based on a vmighted checklist of factors related to objectives: A key in the evaluation is often reorientation to issues Identified earlier. 2.6.1 The perferred lad use and urban design plan will be prepared, as followst Delineation Of boundaries for the proposed devolcpzaht and subarea planning unital Assignment of specific land use types, intensities, and design characteristics as they relate to the specific plan area and sub- areast and S:atistiral tabulation of lad uses by planning unite. 2 6 2 1WAFFIC A[ALYSISt 2.6.2 1 Additional Data Collection and Opportunities Cbnstr is A technical rarcrandm will be pm=od that will identify the Oppocbahitivs and constraints from a traffic perspective, along the Foothill Boulevard Cbrrider. 'hens apportemitier and constraints will then be the focus of the transpartaticn and b af£ic issues to be addressed by the planting tem. M ST110YM UT Page 20 03113/86 157/05.000 338 The throe areas that will to focused on aret o Emdmdzing capacity - providing for maxim= vehicular movement at the highest level of service possibled o Iacal aco ss - providing sufficient access tv evelopment along the wrridorl and o ^ -ftax - avoiding conflicts and vehicular .movers wtdcu disrupt flow and could be hazardous. Bins all three of them parameters are interrelated, the choice of the most appropriate dishctloh to take will be a function of tin trade-offs between traffic operative, masse and safety. This m®randum will identify the components of each trade -off. Tn addition, the avmcrandh= will also mrsarize the existing facilitie9. corditiaha and operating characteristics utilizing the data collected by MCS as part of the city -wide study. Peak hour tuunirg mvsment counts and will also be collected and summarized at no more than ten intersection 3 and put of this work task. Ttase intersections haw been previously identiflod by the City of rUncho Cocamo ga. 2.6.2.2 TPACS Ebdel Application cm will modify the odating city-wide Traffic Analysis Clnputer Sofbrare (TRACS) medal to include the bw grohmd traffic counts collected in Took 1. Then, utilizing the preferred land use alternative for the corridor, as identified by the City and or EOR%, the TRACS model will be run to forecast future traffic volumes along the cerrldor. Each intersection along the oxzidor rill then be evaluated using mnxptal pl=uming methodologies. 2.6.2.3 Provide Traffic Engineering input to the Plan OILS Associates will develop a set of traffic engineering rroormmdatias far the spocific Plan based on t.`:- traffic forecast analyses. we will meet with the MM team to identify appro- priate sub cuts and median breaks as well as to M STVPIIi.TxT Pago 21 07/13186 157 105.000 339 ensure crosistehcy L= a traffic enguwering pernpeetive. We will also review Specific draw- ings developed by TMM far cansisssbmxy with traffic engineering needs. It is anticipated that m sore than three (3) mtetinggs with FaM cr City Staff will be rwpdr'ed to m43ete this task. 2.6.2.4 Right-Of-Way (FDO icguir �ts: DO Associates will also review existing ROW limits alcg Ebcthill Boulevard (informatLm to be provided by City Staff). identify fntrae anticipated Row needs for the rn9 (1) preferred 3md two alternative, and sake nommary re=memdaticm for any BON acquiutim to the City. 2.6.2.5 Attendance at Cm=il )retire 2.6.A PrCCWTSs 03/13/86 CRS will attend no cone than two (2) cmucil meetings with TaM, representing the cmnmsulting term as the Traffic lrgirreri g a ty Staff (Jointly) prior to each meeting to prepare each presehtatim. Hmmver, FOR% will ce making each presentation and prepnsing any necessary graphics or had -out materials. 2.6.1 Preferred land Use Plan in rrtuoducible fcmat. 2.6.2 Preferred thbtn tlesien Plan including the follaving: 2.6.2.1 Theso statements 2.6.2.2 Architecture materials and fcmn by ati>- arca. 2.6.2.3 t..n.a�.+. mterials and fomn by sub - anann. 2.6.2.4 Site Plena fcm and cnfiguratimsr by a�i area. 2.6.2.5 �stratives as repessars to cep bores. Page 22 3 (10 )97/05.000 2.6.2.6 Four typical Mrster /plmudng die mfr t ano other Inproverents. 2.6.2.7 rour typical alltetseape cross sections and A of ATan9 2.6.2.8 Format to fulfill Specific Plan Guidelines Task 2.9. 2.6.2.9 Mrculation Plan Team mmbe= involved/percent Involved: Rick Caner /25I, Van stephe:s /10%, Rick lhm 101, Gem Rsie IGS, Prank laeckman/101, Daryl Flaming /51, and an working mambers /301 2.6.3 DRS Reports 2.7 EDONtMC DEVEM MP PIAN Specific action programs for each priority objective will be outlined. Program frameworks will provido: 2.7.1 Regulatory or legislative Actions (e.g., xrx:r:- ing, creation of flexible sating Standards, etc.). 2.7.2 Potential Administrative Hedvmisuv (use of am �tfm of Developnea Corporation, etc.). 2.7.3 Evaluate Available Lncentitej and Funding Sources such as: Special do elopmt incentives, assessment districts, em311 business grants, loaf programs, and redevelopm , participation. 2.7.4 Special infrastructure aril Service Delivery Needs 2.7.5 Prvmtional Efforts 2.7.6 Program ACt(,ma Pasponsive to implicit D'v07tic Developmnt Cbjectives: M S1D017LTU Page 23 03/13/86 157/05.000 i - Attraction of fiscally strong retail, service and office space uses; - Ratention and upyradino of existing viable businesses; and - Compatible Vining between residential tigrcuth and c=wmial davalopaent. Cecgraphic targeting will ba considered within " z this task through the use of work sesaims. 2.7.7 4brkLg goals will then be prioritized according to time hmizaut - Short-term Goal .s1 12 -18 months - Mid -reLyp Goals: 1 1/2 to 5 }ears !� - isle -rango Goals: Beyond 5 year horizon PR DU=s Draft 1ka:aaic Damlcpmcnt Plan 7*= !embers Involved/Percentage Involvedt Rick Gomoz/20i, Van Stephens /10i, Lloyd Zola/151, Ray Yang /30 %, and all wrking nmxbexa 2.8 P:WSIM PIAN A prototypical Phasing Plan w1ll be prepared far the entire ftlothill Oorridor. It will include a program organized into several sub- pt:sses and will be focused on _ staging private development with Public facilities to ao=mrodate priorities for City implene:tation. K The putposa of the Phash g Plan is to illustrate how to resolve issues related to the interrelationships of land : and Infrastructure development timing. Performance criteria for public services and facilities will identify development thresholds at which additional development and/or services are required. Infrastructure development inerments corresponding to the develep ant thresholds will be identified. Thresholds and incraaents will be consistent with the service and facility needs identified in the public services plan and will be coordinated with s+ the Boonomic Development Strategy to ensure that they are cost - effective and can be financially suppoi ed. •� `•C Infrastructure incrtuetta will be coordinated with the Land Use Plan to identify the special needs of individual sub - actives. Ttus, the phasing plan will reflect not only S• , M Snmm.TXr Page 24 .i_ 0!/13/86 157/05.000 to the total level of develgment, but to the unique character of each land use irxe went. PFcDwri Draft Phasing Plan Team Members Irrvolved/Percentgn Eavolved Rick Cams/ 151, Lloyd Zola/201, Bill Ftann/101, pay yang /101, Daryl Pleminq /51, and all vc--king mentma /40% 2.9 SPD=nc PLAM IMM GUL'7F zS omVrelensive design guidelines aid 111ustratime will be drafted in order to implement the land use plan and the city's strategies for urban design/identification of future projects within the Foothill Boulevard corridor. Arceitectsal, Landscape and liaidsrape elements will be designed in a manner to canto a stag image for the Specific Plan area projecting a unigae 'Sense of Place' consistent with the preferred Utba n Design Plan. This will be ace plislo3 by means of unique material usage, composition of materials and ta_ntanin.a, consistent repetition of design features. Design gaid. lines prepared for the Specific Plan will include: - Site Planning - Strt#tmrape Design n,idelines - Gateway /Fhty Fun ume ntatiea - Simony Deign nm+idelime - Landscape Architectural Darien ouidelines (e.g., medians, street furniture, etc.) — Architectural Dsafgn p+ideliroa Additional technical stmxkrla will be developed to sup- plement the existing development standards for Foothill Boulevard and, if necessary, to address site- specific mdltions regarding building setbacks. coverage, lot oonsolidatio n/nwter planning, nouconfoaming lots and structures, etc. A major objective of the design guidelines will deal with buffer transitions to ensure land-use cwtntibility, and allow development to occur without adversely impacting existing raighborboods. M STUDf04 MM Page 25 03/13/86 157105.000 35� 3 2.9.A PTODXrot 2.9.1 graft Ohielelines all features of Q' Stra 2.9.2 Graphic for each major category of guideline. 2.9.3 Smary nghies including Multiple Guideline Luxes. 2.9.0 Subicta�. • rRa and typiml illustxatiw Tome Mbuens In olved/Prscehtago Involved: Rick Gomez /201, Nan Stephens /51, Rick Ham' /51, Bill Gur ea /101, Ccr ad Sick/1011 Orris R=tz /151, acd all working membecs /351 2.10 Pre aration of Draft Specific Plan: Basoi cn the preceding:brk 7bsic, a ompilation/syntimsis of tie Specific Plan eac{oneauto will be perfivtmtd in order to develop a comprehehsiva draft d=EMCnt for PlarJW'g Ozmaiaaion aed City Ozmoil rcvicw. 2.10.1 PR00l1CTt I. Summary of Baekgrouad Report 2. Goals and (bjectives 3. Preferred trend Use Plan 4. Perferred Ud= Design Plan S. Ci.culation Plen 6. Dzr=ic DevelcpTent Plan 7. .: acing Plan 0. cVecific Plan Design ca.e.teh nse /Illaatratiens ;t. Implementation Plan 2.10.2 wovide thrm (3) screen ce[3: espies for Staff review. X S OMLTxr Ago 26 01/13/86 !, J! 157/05.000 2.10.3 Provtdo cm= rewly draft copy and coordinate the delivery of fifty (50) curies after seraaa check emrrnts for Planning C J situ and City council review. Ream mmbem Involved/Percentage imrolve& Rids G 9 /251, Van Stephens /51, Prank Dret3man/201, Denis Mu= /201 and Sit Staff /:v% 2.11.1 Based on decrantatim of existing c rditions in the Pasearch and Analysis Report, potential en- virommtal crosegtmrx:es of the Specific Plan and their probable level of significance wydl be evaluated. 1� r r 2.11.2 if, following Staff review, it is determined that a (Ritiga+od) Nogativo Declaration would be tho pxcptr environmental documentation for the Plan, the fallowing tasks will be accruplished: 1. Following preparation of the draft Specific Plan text, t1n emmn3ed Initial. Study will be reviewed in light of later findings and rfeme>eodatimv of the 4 =ifir Plan beat. A namrry mnmo will be prx;ared and nmZaitted to City Staff. 2. If, leased on the review of the Initial Study and meeting vith Staff, it is deter nsimd that a (tit igabed) Negative Declar- ation is still in order, PUM -PIMUM WEN= Will prepare the document, and M Sr DDL7= Page 27 05/13/86 157/05.000 ,sue 3� submit it to Staff for review and convent. Staff's caaients will be L-corporated into the (Mitigated) Negative Declaration, and it will be submitted to the City for later use. PFCDt=: Expanded Initial Study - Mitigate Negative Declaration 'Deem Members Imolved/Pexoentace Involved: Ride Gamz /5p, Lloyd Zola /60t ant Support Staff•N358 2.11.3 Focused Fhvironmental Mupact Report (7ptional) If it is found that the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan could result in significant adverse imgact4, FUN- PLANU= NiEWRK will meet with Staff to identify the scope of the EIR. Based on this meeting. Consultant will prepare a Notice of Preparation, and will deliver the Notice of Preparation to tha City for distribution. Concurrent with disiribution of the x:atico of Preparation, preparation of the (Focused) Er: ircruental Mgmct ReE r t will begin. 'figs will consist of the follming tasks: - Refine the Research and Analysis Report's deacription/evalcation of the project area aril surrou din; areas as they affet t developmnt of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area. - Assess environrnntal impacts uldc c oculd result from implementation of the Rx*hi1l Boulevard Specific Plan. - Graphically depict envizonmental/PlzjmA+e3 facbors and their relation to project area development. - Identify potential alternatives to tut proposed Project, including Ono pros,==, and ccuparetivo analysis of drtject- related impacts and project alternative impacts. - Fo>mtlate mitigation meal nos. M S1DUf *DO Page 28 - 0 '5/13/86 157/05.050 3 �� - Analyze residual impacts after implementation of mitigation measures. - The work products outline above will be compiled into a screenchock copy of the (Foansed) EIR and silmittel to the City for review ani couent. Following the public review period, re- sponses to all caments vdnieh were received will be prepared. A screnmcheck copy of proposed responses to can.ents will be sub- mitted to the City for rr;iew and camient. City comrmts will be fno)rporated into the Elk, rnd a Find F1R supplant will be prepared and submitted to the City. PFODOCJ.': Focused EIR Team Members Invol ed/Percentago Involved: Rick Gomez /106, Lloyd Zoln/506, and Support Staff /406 2.11.4 Q tit Arm me Analysis (Optional) Implementation of the specific Plan may have significant implications upon a:mual municipal revenue streams, services costs, and employment gen- eration, as well as on the land use character of Rancho Cucamonga. To analyze them implica- tlons, three sots of land use program actions can be assessed: 1) diaplaament effects on existing m rg n l and healthy land uses, 2) direct employment growth; and 3) annualized oost/revemn streams with net fiscal cost or benefits from retail, office, and relp tad devel- op=t. One to the large number of unknowns associated with this area, only a •build -out fiscal balance* will be estimated. Based on projected timing of roaday and median improvements, as well as other physical changes proposed in the Specific Plan, the potential for displacing marginal or even presently healthy land uses along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor can be evaluated. In addition to evaluating displacement effects, mdstlrng and future employment cnditians can be assessed. M S1UDyM.T7CJ.' Page 29 03/13/86 157/05.000 3y7 on-going costs and revenues can be estimated on a per Acre basis for each of the major w a- gor_es of cvmrrolal and use proposed• t fee current Rancho CUca cnos�mmitipa multipliers schedules, and property can be used as input to the fiscal analysis s model. Individual cost/revenue categories to be identified includes Taxes Police Service sales ,ms Use Taxes Fire protection Services Business License Fees Water, Sewer, Solid Waste Transient 0=*w -T •(where applicable) � � 'Je Om d misc. revenues IMirect wd non-monetary benefits of the oomercial develop:sht strategy will also be described, though not in tsars of technical derails. in the event that residential dM - opeeat is to be a major part _ land Use Plan, a separatef residential +fisca foe. analysis can be prepared PR==: Cost Peveaua Analysis 10ptichal) Them Md ers Involved /Percentage Involved: Rich Cnmer /59, Lloyd Zola159, Ray young /609 and Support Staff /309 2.12 PRtP� ! 6PT PLAN Ahi) After cwpleticn of the public hearing POrtiOn of the the Ocopa of Innaall �ifia�� otextt and illustrations will be Isepartd Eased on input received fras the Plamhiiny Cmaissio, City Anil, and City Staff. 2.12.1 pFCD)C1S:(1) U reedy �Y of final text and illustrations Team Mrmbesa Involved/parentage Involved: Rick Cover /109, Van Stephens /59, Frank Drec)a=V309, Denis yua:tz /209, and Support Staff /359 M S7J=.= Page 30 157/05.000 0 "S/13/86 3(/9 2.13 Managmant: Due to the size and canplexity of your stated requests, the one sure way to provide expertise to caplete the fbothill Boulevard Corridor Plan is to carbine a diversified and oomplAmntary team of professionals who are experts in tho issues facing the study area. Thus, FOM -PIAMM NH1hOM offers the following team, which is directed by principals and key staff with extensive experience in the issues facing the study area: FOWA- PLANNING hLTMX K: lead Planners, LmIscape Architects, Urban Designers, and Envizurmental Analysis T� A. YOUNG: Ecs:onic Ouvelcnnent Planners BILL MNN 6 ASSOCIATES: Civil Engirccring - Drainages DRS, ASSOCIATES: Traffic Engineering To assure the smooch functioning of the team, Senior Director, Rick Gar will service as Project Director, and will direct the day -to-day activities of the team. He will also be primarily responsible for coordinating the project with City Staff. CITY SL4FP ASSTS CE M S7UDm.TXT Page 31 07/13/86 157/05.000 " '+ 3 (17 w� W r LL m a E'J U JUN 0 1 0 0 0 Oa °a a oa 350 4�5�•.lii VC O V pal ut X0<0 s EXHIBIT D �Ayy�EEi Dy all AA C C 07 �= Y OD GO I�w in r=w r nwle' o n.lri^ .pl, �^ n ER 9^ww 1 to y�1 A S� I S � 1 r� l ne n lien 1 nwQ' s �n pM O� w IIS 1 111$ 13 11 yygg w r1 IlI� 0° k In I Soo. 'pi IV n .i .pipipi ' 3-5-1 a 0 .t 'i'v. 03.3 CM OF UNCHO Cfirts tumv.. J:S d CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT , . a r >O � F $ Z J > DATE: March ld, 1986 On TO: Mayor and Members of City Council PROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Jerry B. Pulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING REPORT OF ENGINEER AND CONFIRMING REASSESSMENTS, RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF BONDS, RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PURCHASE AGREEMENT, NOTICE OF REASSESSMENT. BACr.GROUND: In September of 1982, The City of Rancho Cucamonga isr ed bonds for public improvements within The Sixth Street Industrial Park Assessment District 82 -1. The issue totalled approximately $0,890,000, the p•ogram was initiated by property owner petition. Approximately one year ago, Council authorized Staff to investigate the possibility of refunding this issue; however, it was determined that the limited savings would not justify the refunding of the outstanding original bonds. During the beginning of this fiscal year, Staff observed that the Bond Marker was improving. Therefore, Staff investigated the viability and possibility of refunding this Bond Issue. Staff investigation confirmed the potential substantial savings for property owners within the District. The projected savings to property owners within the District will be over one million dollars. Therefore, on March 5, 1986, Council adopted .he Resolution Making Preliminary Determination and Declaring Intention to Issue Pefunding Bonds for a Specia, Assessment District, and ordering a report thereon. Additionally, Council approved consultant contracts vith P. Mackenzie Brown as Bond Counsel, Pieldman, Rolapp and Associates zs rinancial Consultants. Uilldan Associate: contract was not available for Council review or approval. o p$— On March 20, 1906, The Engincer'e Report, and t%c Resolutiar, of Issuanca Authorizing the Issue of the ReCunding Onnds, a Purchase Contract with Stun" and Youmlbarg, tho Underwriters, and a Professional Service Agreement from Nilldan Associates will be available for council's consideration. 2.�NAALp�J-10Nt Presently, the Bond Market is favorably Pon iti.oiJad-to benefit an advance refunding. The advance cofundinq will not increase the outstanding principal debt nor extend the maturity date of the original bond lesu . Additionally, prcparty owner's assonsnents within the Diutrict will be reduced except for delinquent asseasmonts and non- assassed parca'_s. A noainal saving of over ono million dollars will be realized within the Assessment "Latrine. Thereford, a Resolution Approving Report of Engineer and Confirming Reassessments la enclosed; this would be tho formal action of the City Council approving the report and confirming the raaasasmzints for the refunding bonds. Additionally, a Pesol,.tion Authorizing issuance of Bonds Le enclosed. This sets the formal terms and conditions for the Issuance of Bonds. Also, a Resolution Accepting Purchase Agxaumont is included. it provides the formal action of City Council by accepting Purchase Agrosmont • from Stone and Youngberg for sale of refunding bonds. Finally, The Notice of Reassessment for Recordation is provided for Council review and NLlldan Associates Professional Service Agreement is enclosed for Council approval. �EC_OMMEJJD�ATION, Staff recommends the adoption of The Resolution of Issuance Authorizing the Iseuo of the Refunding Bonds and a Purchase Contract with Stone and Youngberg, the Underwriters. Additionally, the enpravaI of Killdan Associates Professional Sarvica Agreement is rocommanded, and the Resolution Approving Report of Engineer and Confirming Reassessment. Rol.�mitted, Sack Lan AICP, Community Davel nt Director JOPJkmm Attachments& Resolution of Sasuance Authe -icing the Issue of the Refunding Bonds and a Purchase Contract with Stone and Youngberg Nilldan erofesaiunal Service Agreements Engineer's Report v= Oder of Procedure �-4V 5 3/) STONE &'YOUNGE•ERG N"SE S rA,,,C f10C4 cxC M GE March 20. 1986 The Honorable Members Of the City Councl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baselin: Road Suite C RanCtO CuLamon7a. CA 91730 Fe Offer to Purchase Bonds In the Principal Amount of S par value Cit of Assessmentn District mNO a82m1R (Refunding) - Memoirs of the council Fursuant to discussions with bon! counsel• your financial consultant. City staff and werherebytofferotoapurchase analysis alloof the saidcaptioned sub�ectIssue (the invesigatin the °Bones'). follc.ing conditlor•s I The par value of the Boons will be S and the Bond: will mature serially over a Fertod of apDrozlmace ly twelve years 2 1913, the Improvement uBonduAct of 1915. and nthe DRefunding eAct tofc1984 h Bonds will be for 1915 Improvement Act Bonds 3 multiples thereof as�ma) be denominations b)susf $One O Bond which Will mature September :. 1987 will be issued to an odd amount a All closingrli'heeCity will retaintthedBankmofsAmericatMd bvBuS.Arias Transfer Agent. Registrar and Paying Agent 5 The Bonds will be dated March 21, 1986 and be delivered on or about their drte 6 The Bonds will mature in each of the years and to the amounts and at the rates of interest set forth on the attached maturity schedule 7 The pu'� "ase price will be accrued Interest 8 The City will establish frcm the proceeds of the Bonds avd /or other sources a reserve fund in the amount of not less than $ The reserve fund w an he City ill be hold and malntr',ed asa dar111 yeast account dm distinct all other fun inisteredin accordance wltn bond ONC GwfaWM STFM S jRAMCMCO.CALVoA"wln 1415)06iIM{ S It 3._ 5 Members of the City Council of the March 20, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamenga _ Page 2 9 The City will covenant to commence judicial foreclosure of delinquent assessments within 150 days after any delinquency 10 The City will award the sale of the Bonds to us at their meeting on March 20, 1986 11 The purchase price of the Bonds will be paid in fuss upon delivery to us of the Bonds accompanied by (1) the unqualified legal opinion of F Mackenzie Brown, Rancho Santa Fe, CA The legal opinion will be printed on the Bonds at no charge •o us, (2) a no- litigation certificate of the City, and (3) an cpinlon, dated the closing date, from Jones Hall Hill 8 White, stating the Bonds will be exempt from Federal Inc= taxes if MR 3838, In its present form, is enacted into law 12 The obligations of the Underwriters to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds on the Closing Date will be subject, at the option of the Underwriters to the following additional conditions (a) The Resolution and any other applicable agreements will be In full force and effect, and will not have been amended, modified or supplemented except as may have been agreed In writing by the Underwriters, and there will have bean taken in connection therewith, with the issuance of the 8onos and with the transactions contemplated thereby and by this Purchase Contract, all such actions as, In the opinion of F Mackenziv Brown, Rancho Santa Fe, California, Bond Counsel for the City, will be recessary and appropriate, (b) Between the date hereof and the closing date, the market price or marketability of the Bonds at the initial offering prices set forth In the Offering Memorandum, In the judgment of the Underwriters (evidenced by a written notice to the City terminating the obligation of the Underwriters to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds) by reason of any of the following (1) Legislation enacted (or resolution passed) by the Congress of the United States of America or a decision rendered by a court established under Article III of the Constitution of the United States of America or by the Tax Court of the United States of America, or an order, runny, regulation (final, temporary or proposed), press release or other form of notice issued or made by or on behalf of the Treasury Department or the Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America, with the purpose or effect, directly or Indirectly, of imposing federal Income taxation upon the Interest as would be received by the owners of the Bonds; ,566 Members of the City Council of the March 20, 19P,6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 (2) Leglslaticn enacted (or resolution passed) by the Congress of the United States of America, or an order, dec-ee or injunction Issued by a,iy court of competent jurisdiction or an order, ruling, regulation (final, temporary or proposed), press release or other form of notice Issued or made by or on behalf of the Securities and E•change Commisslon, or any other governmental agency having jurlcdlctlon of the subject matter, to the effect that obligations of the general character of t',e Bonds, or the Bonds. Including any or all underlying arrangements, are not exempt from registration under or o'.her requirements of the Securities Act of 1931, as amended, or that the Resolution is not exempt from quallfl�atlon under or other requirements of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, or ttat the Issuance, offering or sale of obligations of the general characte• of the Bonds, or cf the Bonds. Including any or all unserwriting arrangements, as contemplated hereby or by the rffering Memorandum or otherwise Is or would be in vlole tion of the federal severities laws as amerded and Caen In effect; (3) T:re withdrawal or downgrading of any rating of any ;ecurlties of the City by a nitlonal municipal Bond rating agency (4, Any amendment to the redera' or California Constitution or action by any Federal or California court, legls'ative body, regulatory body or other authority materially adversely affecting the t,x status of the Cltv, Its property, Income, securilles (or Interest thereon), validity or enforceablltty of the assessments, or (So Any event occurring, o, information becoming known which, In the judgment of thr Unde,•writers makes untrue or misleading In any naterial respect any statement or information containea in the Offering Memorandum concerning the City, the Improvement Project, the property owners, or the property assesssd. Members )f the City Council of the March 20. 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 13. This bid is conditioned upon the successful consummation of the reassessment district proceedings and should said proceedings for any reason fail to be successfully consummated. there will he no obligation on the part of the City LHH sg (02301) cc F Mackenzie Brown Jones Halt Hill & White Respectfully submitted. STONE & YOUNGBERG L William (luck Partner 35-�s u+ City of Rancbo Cucamonga Improvement Bonds Assessment District No 82 —IR (Refunding) Meturity Date Principal Interest (Saotember 2) Angunt Rate 1987 f % 1988 % 1989 % 1990 % 1991 % 1992 % 1993 Z 1994 % 1995 % 1996 % 1997 % 1998 % The net Interest cost of the Bonds tased or the above maturity schedule is _ _ percent The average interest rate is _percent a i a 359 F;WESS10NAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered Into this _,'f.TZ day of )7 al 1986, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinaf- ter referred to as "CITY") and Mllidan Associates (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). A. Recltai- (I) CITY has heretofore Issued Its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professinnai services with respect to the preparation of Assessment Engineer documents and reports for the refunding of Bonds for As- sessment District No. 82 -1 ( "Project" hereafter). (II) CONSULTANT has now submitted Its proposal for the performance Of such services. (111) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANTS to perform professional ser- vices necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITYts Planning Cann mission, City Council and staff In the preparation of Project. (tv) CONSULTANT represents that It Is qualified to perform such ser- vices and Is willing to perform such rifesslonal services as hereinafter de- fined. NON, THEREFORE, it Is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as fol- lorst S. Agrom ant 1. DefI nit lmr)yt The following def In it Ions shell apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requirest (a) Prolacts The preparation of Assessment Engineer documents and reports for Refunding of Bonds for Assessment District No. 82 -1 described In Exhibit wA" Scope of Sorvices hereto Including, but not limited to, the 1 . 3�d preparation of maps, surveys, reports and documents) the presentation, bolq oral and In writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required) and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined In the Scope of Services. (b) Seryleasi Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT In order to complete the project. (e) Complatlen of Protects The date of completion of all phases of the project. Including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, sur- veys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and at- tendanco by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction Is set forth In Exhibit "B" Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT anreew as follows, (e) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project In accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulatlons, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satis- faction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") In- cluding all supplemental technical documents, as described In Exhibit "A", to CITY within the time specified In Project Schedule, Exhibit "B ". Copies of the documents shell be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said docu- ments and (Y;NSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemeu necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents In such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth 2 3Gi pursuant to this Section UZ.(b) may be extended upon a written approve) of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shell, at CONSULTANT1s sole cost and expanse, socuse and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of We Agreement. In the event any such other per- sot; are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such parsons snail be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY ggr "es aS fellows) (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $15,000 for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and Indirect cost or fees, Including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CON- SULTANT, by CITY, shall be made In accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "C". (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shell be made by CITY In accordance with the Invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such Invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said Invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed In Exhibit "C" either with raspect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for Individual tasks. In no event, hottever, will said Invoices exceed 95$ of Individual task totals doserlbed In Exhibits "A" and "C". (a) CONSULTANT agrees that. In no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum In excess of 95f of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemen- tal technical documents, as described herein acceptable In form and content to 3 CITY. Final payment shall be made not later then 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additiinal services: Peyments for additional services request- ed, In writing, by CITY, and not Included In the Scope of Services as set forth In Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement bcsls In acco: dance with the fee schedule set forth In Exhibit "C ". Charges for additional services shall be Involcod on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within f j a reasonable time after said Invoices are received by CITY. S. CITY to prnvlde to COMM MANr1 (a) Information and assistance as set forth In Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other Informa- tlon, If available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary In order to complete i the project. t s (c) Such Information as Is generally available from CITY flies ap- r placable to the project. r (d) Assistance, It necessary, In obtaining Informat n from other governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT1s responsibility to make all Initial contact with respect to the gathering of such Information. w S. Ownership, of oocumnntsl All documents, data studles, surveys, draw a e F Ings , maps, models photographs and rn Do its prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for 4 services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and ether Identified materl- els shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. MNSULTANT may, however, make t and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may de- sire. 4 3�,3 Any use or rouse of the plans and specifications except at the site Intended x any alteration or revision of the plans or speclf lcatlons by the CITY, Its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole .Isk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmloss and Indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses Including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY, Its stntf or authorized agents. 6. Terninntlenl This Agreement may be torm!ncted by CITY upon the giv- Ing of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (IS) days prior to the data of termination specified In said Notice. In the event this Agreement Is so terminated, CONSULTANT snail be compensated at CONSULTANT's appl(catle hourly rates as eat forth In Exhibit "C", on a pro rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified In Paragraph 3 (a) above. CMULTANT shall provide to CITY eny and ell documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether In draft or final form, prepared by CONSUL- TANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notice and naglgnnted Panrs%@ntativesl Any and all notices, de- mands, Invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as sot forth In this Paragraph 7. Tha below named Individuals, fur- thermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreamentl yiilian eteekay_ wl ld.n Aer....tnte. 290 �+L A A ehaim &- laved C Itw 100 lnah I A o7e pie Lleyd Nuhhe _Gifu F gi eer P O Pam fez P he - g GA e17tn 3 3G W e Any such notices, demands, Invoices and written communications, by mall, -hall he deemed to have boon received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thsroof In the United States mall, postage prepaid and properly ad- dressed as set forth above. 8. jrsurencer CONSULTANT shell neither commence work under this carer ment until .t has obtained all Irsurance required hereunder In a company or r companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTATT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all Insurance required of the subcontrao- ' for has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of Insurances (a) Wor1cnNs Ca nsrqstlaa ln.urenget ilefore beginning nark, CON- SULTANT shall furnish to CITY a Cortif tests of lnsurance as proof that It has taken out full Worker's Compensation Insurance for all persons whom It may employ directly or through subcontractors In carrying out the work specified herein. In accordance with the I"a of the State of California, In accordance with the provisions of California Labor rods Section 3700, every employer shell secure the payment of compensation to his Wfloy- ses. CONSULTANT, prior to commencing work, shell sign and file with CITY a certification as follows, r "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be Inrured against liability for Morkerls Compensation or to undertake self Insurance In accordance with the provisions of that codo, and I will comply wit'n such provisions before cremncing the performance of the work c! this Agreement." (b) yDampgar Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cast and expense, Q: -MIANT shall keep, Q 3�s �b or cause to be kept, In full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY a„d CONSULTANT, ccmprehanslve, broad form, general public liability and auto- mobile Insurance against claims and liabilities for personal Injury, death or property damage arising from CONSULTANfrs activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for bodily Injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dol- lars ($1,000,000) for property damage. (c) Frrnr+ end nat++len+1 CONSULTANT shell take out and maintain at all times during the IIfa of this Agreement, a poiiry or poi lc lee of insur- ance concerning errors and emissions (* malpractice*) providing protection of at least $1,000,000 each occurrence and occurrence aggregate for errors and omissions (*malpractice ") with respect to loss arlaing from actions of CONSUL- TANT performing englneerirg services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General 1113"CROGN Pe nrement t All Insurance required by ex- press provision of this Agreement shall be carried only In responsible Insur- ance eompenles licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required ender Paragraphs 0 (a) and (b) shall name as additional Insureds CITY, Its alected officials, officers, employees and agents. All policies shell contain language, to the extent obtainable, t,) the affect that (1) the (nourer valves the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY1s elected offt- clals, officers, employees and agents) (2) the Policies are primary and noncontributing with any Insurance that may be carried by CITY1 and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days notice by the Inscror to CITY by cortlf led mall. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such POI Was promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evf- dancing the Insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for Its own account Insurance no•, required under this Agreement. 7 36� ,gas 0 9. Indem^Iflratlnnt COlstSULTANt• shall defend, Indemnify and save here. less CITY, Its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employ- ees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or proporty. Including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorney's fees, In any manner arising out of any nagiigont or Intentional or wl'Iful acts or omissions of thw CONSULTANT In the performance of this Agreement, in- cluding, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. '0. A••Inmm=t: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obil- gation of performance hereunder shall be mete, either In whole or In part, by CONSULTANT without the prirr written consent of CITY. 11, endenendent r I11 aet^rt The pertlos hereto agree that CONSULTANT and Its employers, officers and agents err. Independent contractors under this Agreement and shalt not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governl ^^ Iavt This Agreement shell be governed by and construed In accordance with tte lows of the State of California. 13. Attnrneyr. EjWt In the event any legal proceeding Is Instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party In said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorney's fees and costs from the opposing party In an wt)unt determined by the Court to be reasonable. 11. Entire AnrrgMUtt This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or In writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Esch party to this Agreement acknowledges that no rep - rasentatlon by any party which Is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained In this Agreement shell be valid and b nd- Ing. Any modification of this Agreement shell be effective only If it Is In writing signed by all parties. 8 3(,7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have exeautod this Agreement as of tho day and year flrot sat forth above: CONSULTANT Gary P. Dysart Date: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jon D. Mikel s, Mayor Date: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelst, Clty Clark Approved as to form: City Attorney 9 EXHIBIT wAe SCOPE OF rM aMIECr hyERM Our proposed wort- program for the refunding of the bonds I, Assassaaat Cls trict Ho. 82 -1 Is divided Into four (4) steps as follwss I. Meet with the City of Rancho Cucaronga, berelwftr reforred to as 'Agency*, to review proposed refunding process for Assessest Dte- trlct No. 82 -I, hereinafter referred to as the aDistrtcte, and de- fine the key District parameters. 2. Preparo the Engtneerls Report and Aaanded Ding s for the District In preparation for recording said diagram with the County. 3. Prepare the official Annual debt Service computer listing which will ref ioct the re- assessments for each fort of record. 4. Assist Agency and/or Its designated conwltaat is conducting the proceeding toward the bond sale and subsegnwrt collection In Aegmt for FY 86-87. smff OF SERYIM Following Is our proposed Scope of Services based upon cur understanding of the assignment: Pert 1 - Prwneratien of Fn eer•- - - - - -- - - The report will contain: 1. Estfinete of Costs Based upon mesttngs and Input fro, agency, specific costs shall be dot lned. This portion of the report sets reccrd of principle and Interest Installments of bonds recalatag unpaid. 2. Re- Assmsswnt Conpletlon of this portion of the report Is dependant apoo tto fol- lowing steps: a. Preparstlon of Amended Diagram This map will be prepared based upon the Cwaty of See Bernardino Assessorts maps. For the purpose of disclosing "a toundarles of the District, this way shall be slaced b, Agascy Officials and will be rKulred to be rernrdw. b. Preparation of Exhibits Reduced rarslons of the Amended Diagram for use as an insert for the Eoglaeeras Report, and as an attac(uwnt for Agency res- olutlons. 1- Research all property within the boundary of the District to deter- mine currant Assessor parcel Number (APR) as assigned by the San Bernardino County Assessor. 2. Reflect all corrections to APR and address applicable apportionments to assign re- assessment amount. 3- lftilizlmg the re- assessment principle and Interest amounts, gsnarate an Annual Debar Serwice Report del lecting the re- assessment bonds. 4. Generate a collection computer tape, compatible with the San Bernardino nty computer system, for the collection of Fy 1986 -a7. Prccoss to county. 1- Attend two (2) Council meetings. 2- Coordinate with Agency to obtsin collection fund number from San Bernardino County Auditor /Control ter. 370 EXHIBIT "B" PROJECT SCHEDULE Complete nccossary documentation to Initiate proceedings on March 9, iS86, with Public Hearing to be held March 19, 1986. Comalcte proceedings by June 1, 1986, with collection by August 1, 1986. 37/ EXHIBIT NCO PAYWHT SCHEDULE Payment shell be based on porcenY of completion of the complete project not to exceed $15,000. 3 -7a ORDER OF P..WXMRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCJIMfwA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-IR (REFUND) DATE OF MEETINGt M7PCM 20. 1966 STAFF: 1. Presentation of the 'Refunding and Reassessment Report of Engineer'. consisting of the following: A. A schedule utting forth the unnsid principal and Interest on the Improtement bonds of the original Assessment district to be refunded and the total mounts thereof; 8. A total estimated prinUPSI mount of the "assessment and of the refunding bonds and the saxiern interest rate therun. together with Nt estimctu of costs of the tvassessmant and of issuing the refunding bonds. 14- hiding all costs of issuing the refunding bor ?s; C. Cte Aug pr's Record shewtny the uhedule of the principa installments and Interest on all unpald original assessments and the total mounts theneaf; 0. The estimated must of tub reassessment. identie Id by reatsetsmelt numer corresponding to the reassess- want number ca the reassessment diagram. together with a proposud Auditor's Record for the reassessment; E. A nauasment diagram showing the Refunding District and the boundaries and dimensions of the subdivision of land within the Refunding District. II. Presentation of the Bone Purchase Agreement submitted by Stone and Youngberg. CITY COUNCII: Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING REPORT OF ENGINEER AND COAFIRMING AE- ASSESWNTSt Formal action approving the 'Report- and conffroteg the reassessments for the refunding bonds. CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION AUTMIRIZING AND PRCVIDING FOR THE ISEUACCE OF BONDS: Action authorizing Issuance of the refunding bonds. CITY COUNCIL: Adcpt RESOLUTIOA MAKING. AMD FOR SALE OF REFLNCING BONDS: This Resolution accepts the Purchase Agreement Submitted by Stone A Youngberg for the sale of the bonds. 3-17-3 RESOLUTION NO. 9(,-7q RESOLUTION OF-THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REFUNDING AND REASzESSMENT - REPORT OF ENSINEER AND CONFIRMING REASSESSMENTS FOR REFUNDING BONDS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, dia previously undertake proceedings and confirm assessments in a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'Munlcioal Improvement Act of 19130, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District*); and WHEREAS, improvement bonds representing the unpaid assessments within said Assessment District were Issued and sold in the manner provided in the 'Improvement Bond Act of 19150, being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, at this time, the City is desirous of initiating proceedings to refund all outstanding improvement bonds pursuant to the 'Refunding Act of 1984 for 1915 Improvement Act Bonds', being Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said refunding bonds and district to be designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1R (REFUNDING) (hereinafter referred to as the 'Refunding District'); and, WHEREAS, this City Council has previously oodered the preparation of a Report, said Report to generally contain the following: and, A. A schedule sPtting forth the unpaid principal and irterest on the improve- ment bonds of the original Assessment District to be refunded and the total amounts thereof; B. A total estimated principal amount of the reassessment and of the refunding bonds and the maximum interest rate thereon, together with an estimate of costs of the reassessment and of issuing the refunding bonds, including all costs of issuing the refundinq bonds; C. The Auditors Record showing the schedule of the principal installments and interest on all unpaid original assessments and the total amounts thereof; D. The estimated amount of Pacn reassessment, identified by reassessment number corresponding to the reassessment number on the reassessment diagram, toge- ther with a proposed Auditor's Record for the reassessment; E. A reassessment diagram showing the Refunding District and the boundaries and dimensions of the subdivision of land within the Refunding District. 13 7T WHEREAS, this legislative body has now received and considered the 'Report' of the Engineer and is ready to proceed to make certain findings and approve the *Reports of the Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT- RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the 'Report- of the Engineer entitled 'REFUNDING AND REASSESSMENT Eh51NEER'S REPORT' is hereby approved, and it is hereby determined by this legislative body that the following conditions have been satisfied: A. That each estimated annual installment of principal and interest on the reassessment for the refunding bonds, as set forth in the 'Report', is less than the corresponding installment of principal and Interest now outstanding on the original assessment for the original Assessment Distr4ct; B. That the number of years to maturity of all refunding bonds is no more than the number of years to the last maturity of the bonds being refunded; C. That the amounts of any reassessments have been computed by reducing each unpaid original assessment by the same percentage. SECTION 3. That the assessments for the refunding bonds and reassessments as set forth in the •Report• are herebv approved and confirmed, and a copy of this Resolution shall be entered upon the minutes of this meeting of the legislative body. SECTION 4. This legislative body hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of refund - ing bonds to represent all unpaid reassessments and said bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed the maximum legal rate of 12% per annum, and shall be issued in the manner as provided by Chapter 3 of Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and specifically the 'Refunding Act of 1984 for 19:5 Improvement Act Bonds" The last maturity of said refunding bonds shall not exceed the number of years to the last maturity of the bonds being refunded of the original Assessment nlstrict. SECTION S. The origfna' reassessment, together with the reassessment diagram, as set forth in the Refunding and Reassessment Report of the Engineer, shall Immediately be recorded in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets. Immediately thereafter, a copy of the reassessment diagram shall be filed in the Office of the County Recorder and a Notice of Reassessment, refe- rencing said diagram, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, all pursuant to the provisions of Division 4.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and specifically Section 3114. Upon the recordation, the reassessments shall become liens upon the various parcels of property and land assessed as shown on the reassessment diagram. 32,5- SECTION 6. A copy of this Resolution confirming the reassessments, which reassess- ments shall constitute the security for the refunding bonds, shall be filed in the Office of the Auditor, and the Auditor shall keep the record showing the several installments of principal and interest on the reassessa>tnts which are to be collected each year during the terA of said bands. An annual apporeion of each reassessment, together %ith annual Interest on said reassessaraeet, shall be payable in the same r muw and at the some time and in the sax instaliowt as the general property taxes of the City and shall be payable and became delinquent at the same time and in the same proportionate amount. Each year the aawal installme is shall be submi•ted to the County Auditor for purpose•, of collection, and the County Auditor shall, at the close of the t.& collecting season, promptly render to the City Auditor a detailed rryourt shoring the comet of such installments, interest, penalties and pnrcentages so collected. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1986. ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 740 lRPi4- CITV OF RANCID CIICANONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 8 1, r 750 RESOLUTION OF TIE Cm COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNE1, CALIFORNIA, NMMIZM AID PROVIDING FOR TIE ISSUAACE OF REFUNDING rONDS PiRSUAXT TO THE ' REFUNDING ACT OF 19& FOR 1915 DPROVEMW ACT BONDS* *EREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has heretofore undertake proceedings pursuant to the •Refunding Act of 1964 for 1915 Improvement Act Hoods', being Division U.S of the Streets and highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed reassessments upon lands within a spct'al assessment ,•d':trict _ said special district known and designated as ASMSSM7 DISTRICT NO. 82 -IR (RUMING) (hereinafter referred to as the ORefuasing Otsirici'); and, WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for the issuance of bonds pursuant to the 'Refunding Act of 1984 for 1915 Improvement Act Bonds% being Division IM of said Cede, and it is necessary to establish terms and provisions of such issuance. x , :5FAS, here has now been presented for consideration by this legisiative body an 3tatew✓. ca,calnin- infornat4 icluafng tpt: not limitfM to the Refunding District and the type of bonds, incluorn� ......� _.... ;.\. (f."ce NOW, TIE fME, IT 1_'.:F.`9t' RESOLVED AS FOLLOYS: SECTION 1. Recitals. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Issuance of Refurding Bonds. Refunding 6onis in the aggreiate principal sam-�E -0715. 5;Sm:Sis lil be issued M hereinafter provided upon the security of unpaid reassessments levied ih accordance with the refunding law and um tr and pursuant to the proceedlhpt thereunder duly had and taken, Thk Refunding Bonds herein provided AN ue issued shall be known as •City of Rancho Cucamonga Assessment District No. 82 -12 Refunding Bands% (tM_ 'Refunding Bond or Refunding Bonds*), and shall be dated March 21, 1986. The Refunding Bonds shall be issued only in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, except that one Refunding Bond shall include the amount by which ax the total issue exceeds the maxims integral multiple of $5,000 contained therein. The Refunding Bonds shall be issued in serial form with annual maturities on September 2nd of every year succeeding 12 months attar their date, WO-11 SpEtemb" 2, 1998. Refunding Bonds shall mature in the amomats and on the dates and at the rates of interest to be set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract to be sutmittEd to end subject to the approval of this legislative body. SECTION 3. Form of Refun.Cinq Bonds. The Refunding Bonds shall he issued pursuant to e prov s ons 'it the Refunding Act of 1964 for 1915 Improvement Act Bands' (the 'Refunding Lar), being Division 11.5 of the Streets and 377 Highwrys Code of the State of Califonia, and shall be substantially irr the format of bonds as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'lmpravement Band Act of 19150, belnq Division 10 of said Code, except as such fomat may vary from the terms and conditions sat fus:h ix this Resolution. SECTION 4. Interest. Each Refunding Band shall be of a single maturity and shall eb ar Werest at a rate not to exceed 12t per mnur from the- interest payment date next preceding the date on which it is authenticue0. and: registered. unless said Refunding Bond is authenticated and registered as: of to interest payment date, ir, which case It shall bear interest fray said interest payment date, or unless said Refunding Bond is authenti- cated and registerte, prior to tic first interest payment date, in wkidr case it shall bear interest fr-n its date, until Payment 01' its principal sum has been disOnVed. Iatersst shall be payable commencing ow March 2, 1987, and semi - annually thereafter on September 2 and March 2 of each year to maturity. SECTION S. Place of Payment. The principal and interest w the Refmnd!ng Bonds shall payable in lawful money of the United States of Amm ca at the- corporate trust office of the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, S= Francisco, California (the 'Registrar, Paying Agent and Transfer Agent•). Principal and interest on said Refunding Bonds shall be paid by check or- draft to the registered owner thereof at his address as it appear an the books of registration, or at such address as may have bear filed with the Registrar for that purpose, as of the 16th day Immediately preceding stid interest payment date. SECTION 6. Redemption. This Refundinq Bond, or a portion thereof if Issued in a Jw—m— n ETon greater than 2'5,0!+0, S.nall be ssbject to redemption and payment in advance of maturity in inere ents of S5,O00 as provided in Section 8768 of the Streets and Highways rude, an the 2nd day of March or September to any year, by giving Vie notice provided in said law. to the, registered owner thereof at his address as it appears on the books of registration and by paying principal of and accrued interest on such redeemed amount, together with a premium equal to three percent (31) of the redeemed pr'nelpal amount. 'f less than the entire Refunding Sum: is redeemed, the unredeemed portion shall be reissued to the - egistered, owner thereof. SECTION 7. Transfer. of Rerfstered Refundin��.6�cnds. Any fully registered Refunding an may, n actor ante w s fff , be transferred up�m the books of registration required to be kept pursuant to the provisions of Section -8 by the owner to wiwse name it is registered, or oy his duly wthorized attorney or legal representative, upoa surrender of such ful iy regi stared Refunding Bond 'or registration of such transfer, accompanied by delivery of a written instrument or transfer in a form approved by the Transfern Agent and Treasurer and by the omen of said Refueling Bands, duly, executed. &IM M The Transfer Agent shall require the payment by the bondholder requesting such transfer of any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer and such charges as provided for in the system of registration for registered debt obligations. No transfer of fully registered Refunding Bonds shall be required to be made during the fifteen (15) days next preceding each interest payment date. SM ION B. Exchange of Re istered Refundtn Bonds. Fully registered Refunding on s may a exchange at e o ce o the designated Transfer Agent/ Registrar, for a like :ggreoate principal amount of Refunding Bonds of the same series, interest rate and maturity, subject to the terms and conditions provided in the system of registration for registered debt Obligations, including the payment of certain charges, if any, upon surrender and cancellation of this Refunding Bond. Upon such transfer and exchange, a new registered Refunding Bond or Bonds of any authorized denomination or denominations of the same maturity for the sax aggre- gate principal amount will be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor. SECTION 9. Books of Re Isq_ trat1p. There shall be kept by the Registrar sufficient o�d� e� eeg�slration and transfer of the Refunding Bonds and, upon presentation for such purpose, the Registrar shall, urdar such reason- able regulations as it may prescribe, register or transfer or cause to be registered or transferred, on said register. Refunding Bonds as herelnbefore provided. SECTION 10. Execution of Bonds. the Refunding Bonds shall be executed in facsimile by the Mayor ano the Treasurer and attested by the City Clerk, and the corporate seal shall be toprinte' in facsimile on the Refunding Bonds. The Refunding Bonds shall then be delivered to the Transfer Agent and Registrar, for authentication and registration. In case an officer who Shall have signed or attested to Any of the Refunding Bonds by facsimile or otherwise shall cease to be such officer before the authentication, delivery and issuance of the Refunding Bonds, such Refunding Bonds nevertheless may be authenticated, delivered and issued, and upon such authentication, delivery and issue, shall be as binding as though those w *o signed and attested the some had remained in office. SECTION 11. Authentication. Only such of the Refundinq Bonds as shall bear thereon a certificate crate of authentication substantially to the form below, manually executed by the Transfer Agent and Registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this Resolu• tion. and such certificate of the Transfer Agent and Registrar shall be conclusive evidence that the Refunding Bonds so authenticated have been duly oxecuted, authenticated and deliver d hereunder, and are entitled to the benefits of this Resolution. J79 FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION AND REGISTRATION This bond has beer authenticated and registered on BANK,OF AMERICA RATIO:UIL TRUST AND SAYINGS ASSOCIATION as Paying Agent, Registrar and Transfer Agent By: SECTION 12. Negotiability. Re istration and Transfer of Refundi�ng�Buogds. The trans er o any a un ng on may a reg s er an y upon- sucFirbooks of registration upon surrender thereof to the Transfer Agent and Registrar, together with an assignment duly executed by the owner or his attorney or legal representative, in satisfactory form. Upon any such registra- tion of transfer, a new Refunding Bond or Bonds shall be authenticated and delivered in exchange for such Refunding Bond, in the name of the transferee, of any denomination or denominations authorized by this Resolution, and in an aggregate principal amount equal to the principal amount of such Refunding Bond or principal amount of such Refunding Bond or Bonds so surrendered. In all cases in which Refunding Bonds shall be exchanged or transferred, the Transfer Agent and Registrar shall authen- ticate at the earliest practical time, Refunding Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. All Refunding Bonds surrendered in such exchange or registration transfer shall forthwith be cancelled. The legislative body may make a charge for every such exchange or regis- tration of transfer of Refunding Bonds sufficient to reimburse it for any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or registration of transfer. The Transfer Agent and Registrar shall not be required to make such exchange or registration of transfer of Refunding Bonds during the fifteen (15) days immediately preceding any March 2nd or September 2nd. SECTION 13. Ownership of Refund in Bends. The rerson in whose name any Refunding on s a' a reg sere s a 1 be d.,med and regarded as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes, and payment of or on account of the or 4rcipal and redemption premium, if any, of any such Refunding Bond, ind the interest on any such Refunding Bond, shall be made only to or upon the order of the registered owner thereof or his legal representa- tive. All such payments shall be valid an! effectual to satisfy And discharge the liability upon such Refunding Bond, including the redemp- tion premium, if any, and interest thereon, to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. SECTION 14. Mutilated Destroyed Stolen or Lost Refunding Bonds. in case any Kel'unding Hond secured hereby shall ecome mutTr ffeor be destroyed, stolen or lost, the legislative body shall cause to be executed and authenticated a new Refunding Bond of like date and tenor in exchange and substitution fo.• and upon the cancellation of such mutilated Refunding Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for such Refunding Bond destruyed, stelen or lost, upon the owner's paying the reasonable expenses and charges in connection therewith, and, in the case of a ,3 Ra Refunding Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, his filing with the legisla- tive body of evidence satisfactory to It and to the Auditor thereof that such Refunding Bond was Gestruyed, stolen or lost, and of his ownership thereof, and furnishing the legislative body with indemnity satisfactory to it. _ SECTION 15. Cancellation of Refunding Bonds. All Refunding Bonds paid or redeued, e er a or before ma ur y, shall be cancelled upon the payment or redemption of such Refunding Bonds, and shall be delivered to the transfer agent and registrar when such payment or redemption is made. All Refunding Bonds cancelled under aiy of the provisions of this Resolution shall be destroyed by the Transfer Agent and Registrar, which shall execute a certificate in duplicate dt:scrlbing the Refunding Bonds so destroyed, and shall retain said executed certificate in its permanent files for the issue. SECTION 16. Reserve Fund. Pursuant to Part 16 of Divlsio•i 10 of the California trees an tghways Code, as gemmed, there shall be created a special reserve fund for the Refunding Bonds to be designated by the name of the Refunding District and specified as the special mleserve Fund". The Reserve Fund shall be funded as follows: The initial designated amount shall be eight percent (8Y) of the principal amount of the Refunding Bonds (5474,307.08) and shall be deposited in the Reserve Fund out of contributions by the City. Periodically, at such tt ws as may be determined by the legislative body, monies representing interest on funds on deposit in the Reserve Fund shall be trea.cferred to the Reserve Fund, but only to thn extent permitted herein. Monies to the Reserve Fund shall be applied as follows: A. Amounts in said Reserve Fund shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund for the bonds if, as a result of delinquencies in the payment of reassessments, there are insufficient monies in said Redemption Fund to pay principal of and interest on the bonds. Amounts so transferred shall . be repaid to the Reserve Fund from proceeds from the redemption or foreclosure of property with respect to which an reassessment 1s unpaid and from payments of the delinquent ,eassessments; R. The amount in the Rote; a Fund may accrue to ten percent (10%) of the principal dmoun: f tna Refunding Bonds; however, said mount shal am I at no tiny escee the dreeerve requirement• which for purposes of this Resolution means maximum Annual Debt Service or such lesser amount as shall equal '50% of annual debt service for the bond year for which the computation of the reserve requirement is made. For purposes of this Resolution the term 'Annual Debt Serviced means the scheduled amount of interest and amortization of principal payable on the Refunding Bonds in the bond year for which the computation is made. For purposes of this Resolution, the term •Bond Year* means the It month period beginning September 2 of each year and ending on the 1st day of said month in the following year. 3 8/ Annually an the first day of each Bond Year or on the preceding day In the event that such first day is not a business day, the Treasurer shall codpute Annual Debt Service on the REfunding Bonds during the forthcoming Bond Year. In the event that, based upon such computation, the Treasurer determines that the amount then on deposit in the Reserve Fund exceeds the reserve requirement, the Treasurer shall withdraw the excess amounts from the Reserve Fund and shall deposit such amount in the Redemptiot. Fund to be applied to the payment of debt service on the Refunding Bonds on the next Interest payment date. C. Whenever monies in the Reserve Fund are sufficient to retire all of the Refunding Bonds outstanding. plus accrued interest thereon, such money shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund for the Refunding Bonds and collection of the remaining unpaid reassessments shall cease. D. The amount of the annual Reserve Fund disbursement undertaken pursu- tit to subsection B. hereinabove shall be creditcl toward Install- ments of unpaid reassessments each year during which any put of the Refunding Bonds remain outstanding. The Auditor's Record, prepared pursuant to Section 8682 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall reflect credits against each of the unpaid reassessments in the manner provided in Section 10427.1 of said Code, in amounts equal to each parcel's proportionate share of the annual reserve fund disbursement. Sub3ect to the limitations contained in subsection 8 hereinabove, no portion of the annual Reserve Fund disbursement shall be transferred in any year in excess of the amount which would cause the Reserve Fund to fall below the original amount of the Reserve Fund, minus adjustments to reflect the discharge of reassessments prior to maturity made to that point. E. In the event that any annual Reserve Fund disbursement was not fully made in any year because to have done so would have caused the Reserve Fund to fall below the minimum amount for that year, the Treasurer may thereafter transfer and credit any amounts In excess of the minimum amount toward the reassessment installments due in subsequent years. In the event assessments are paid in cash in advance of their final maturity date, the Treasurer is authorized to reduce the minimum amount of the Reserve Fund and increase the annual Reserve Funa disbursements in the proportion in which the reassessments paid in cash bears to the total original unpaid reassessments. SECTION 17. Refunding Trust Fund. T"e proceeds from the sale of the Refunding Bon s, a er epos of required amounts to the Reserve Fund and the Redemption Fund, shall be placed in the fund hereby created, pursuant to Sections 9613 and 9(15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, as amended, which shall be called the 'Refunding Trust Fund% and the monies in said Fund or-all be used only for the purpose of refunding the bonds to be refunded, and the proceeds shall be applied only as permitted by the Refunding Law. 3 sa SECTION 18. Investment of Refunding Trust Fund Monies. Immediately upon deposit of e proceeds from a sa e o efunding Bonds into the Refunding Trust Fund, an amount thereof necessary to pay the principal of and interest and redemption premiums on the refunded bonds on July 2, 1986, shall be- invested by the Treasurer in 'Federal securites' as defined by Section 9600(c) of the California Streets and Highways Code, as amended. Such investment shall mature so as to ensure that such monies, and any Interest earned thereon, are available for the purpose of redeeming the refundeJ bonds on July 2, 1986. Monies in the Refunding Trust Fund may not be Invested so that the interest earned thereon exceeds the interest payable on the Refunding Bonds. SECTION 19. Rectmotion of Refunding Bonds. The Treasurer shall undertake proceed- ings vurscan o v son of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California to cause the advance retirement of the refunded bonds on July 2, 1936. Principal of and interest and redemption premiums on the refunded bonds shall be payable from the Refunding Trust Fund. Any surplus in the Refunding Trust Fund after completion of the advance retirement of the efunded Bonds not necessary to gay the designated cost of Issuance of Refunding Bonds shall be Immediately transferred to the Redemption Fund. SECTION 20. Costs of Issuance. The costs of issuing the Refunding Bonds shall be pa d from e proceeds of sale of the Refunding Bonds. SECTION 21. Redemption Fund. Principal of and interest on said Refunding Bonds shall e paid out of the Redemption Fund created pursuant to Section 8671 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Accrued interest paid by the purchaser of the Refunding Bonds, if any, shall be depo• >ited In the Redemation Fund. SECTION 22. Covenant to Foreclose. The legislative body hereby covenants that upon cetault. or any reassessment payment due, it will cause Superior Court foreclosure proceedings to be brought within one hundred fifty (150) days of such default and thereafter diligently prosecute to completion such proceedings. Such foreclosure proceedings may be deferred If funds are advanced to the special Reserve Fund to keep said Fund continually at the level set forth in the Section entitled 'Reserve Fund' set forth hereinabove. SECTION 23. Urder to Drtnt and Authenticate Refunding Bonds. The Treasurer Is er y n; ruc e o cause a un ng on s, as set forth cbove, to be printed, and to proceed to cause said Refunding Bonds to be authenti- cated and delivered to an authorized representative of the purchaser, upon payment or the purchase price as set forth in the accepted proposal for the sale of Refunding Bonds. SECTION 24. Ron -A bttragee Covenant. The City hereby covenants with the owners of e e u og Binds that it will make no use of the proceeds of the Refunding Bond: at any time during the term thereof which, if such use had been reasonably expected on the date said Refunding Bonds wei 3 a3 issued, would have caused said Refunding Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, or any Internal Revenue 'Code which is enacted in litu of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. SECTION 25. 4rbitra a Certificate. On the basis of the facts, estimates and circum- s anc now n es existence and in existence on the date of Issue of the Refunding Bonds, as determined by the Treasurer, said Treasurer is hereby authorized to certify that it is not expected that the proceeds of the issue will b5 used in a manner that would cause such obligations to be arbitrage bonds. Such certlficatior. shall be delivered to the purchaser together with the Refunding Bonds. SECTION 26. Covenants Relating to Status of Refundin Bonds as Essential Function on s. X. 'The City shall not use nor permit the use, directly or indirectly, of gross proceeds of the Refunding Bonds in to amount equal to or in excess of the lesser of $1,000,000 or five percent (5% ) of the net proceeds of the Refunding Bonds to make or finance a loan to any person other than a governmental unit. B. The City shall not use nor permit the use, directly or indirectly of gross proceeds of the Refunding Bonds in an amount equal to or to excess of the lesser of $1,000,000 or ten percent (10 %) of the net proceeds of the Refunding Bonds in any trade or business carried on by any person other than a governmental unit. C. The term 'governmental unit' as used in this Section does not include the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof. 0. The term 'gross proceeds•, when used with respect to the Refunding Bonds, means the original proceeds of the Refunding Bonds, plus amounts received as a result of investing the original proceeds of the Refunding Bonds, plus amounts used to pay debt service on the Refunding Bonds, and the term "net proceeds% when used with respect to the Refunding Bonds, means proceeds of the Refunding Bonds received on the delivery of the Refunding Bonds less proceeds used to pay costs of the Refunding Bonds and proceeds deposited in the Reserve Fund. SECTION 27. Investment of Monies in Refundin Bond Funds. Except as otherwise pro - v e ere n, all mon es e y te Ired5urer in any of the funds or accounts established pursuant to these proceedings and all monies held by the City in any fund or account which is reaconaily expected to tie used to pay, or which is pledged for the payment of, debt service on the Refunding Bonds shall not be invested so as to adversely affect the exemption from Federal income taxation of interest on the Refunding Bonds. 33,11 SECTION 28. Invcstment of M nies in Assessment District No. 82-1 Funds. From and after e a e o issuance—OF-5e Refunding Bonds, iFeireasurer shall invest all monies remalning in funds for Assessment District No. 82 -1 and not otherwise transferred to any Refunding Bond fund so as to assure thmi the interest or income received by the Treasurer on such Investment of any fund shall not exceed the interest rate on the bonds to be re'onded. SECTION ;9. Investment Earnings Account; Excess Investment Earnings Account; Rebate e�TemanF A. The Treasurer shall establish and maintain as separate trust funds apart from any other funds and accounts established under this Resolution an Investment Earnings Account and an Excess Investment Earnings Account. All interest or intone received by the Treasurer on investment of any fund or account established hereunder (other than the Redemption Fund as long as interest and income on the Redemption Fund in any bond year is less than $100,000, the Reserve Fund as long as the t„tal therein does not exceed the 'reserve requirement', and the Excess Investment Earnings Account) shall be deposited In the Investment Earnings Account. Interest or intone received by the Treasurer on the Redemption Fund (as long as said Interest and income on the Redemption Fund in any bond year is less than $100,000) shall be retained in the Redemption Fund and used for the purposes thereof. Interest on income received by Treasurer on the Reserve Fund shall be retained in the Reserve Fund to the extent permitted by Section 16 herein and used for the purpose thereof. Interest or income on the Excess Investment Earninq Account shall be retained in said Account until required to be rebated in accordance with subsection C. B. Annually, on the first day of each bond year or on the preceding business day in the event that such lust day is not a business day, the Treasurer shdll compute excess investment earnings, shall trans- fer from the Investment Earnings Account to the Excess Investment Earnings Account an a,aunt equal to excess investment earnings and shall trai.sfer all amounts remaining in the Investment Earnings Account to the Redemption Fe -d to be applied to the payment of debt service on the Refunding, uonas on the next interest payment date. C. On behalf of the City, the Treasurer shall pay to the United States all amounts on deposit in the Excess Investment Earnings Account. Such amounts shall be paid by the Treasurer to the United States in installments which are made at least once every five years. Each installment shall be in an amount which ensures that ninety percent (90%) of the excess investment earnings at the time payment of such installment is required will have been paid to the United States. The last installment shall be made ao later than thirty (30) days after the day on which the last principal amount of the Refunding Bonds is paid or redeemed and shall be in an amount sufficient to pay the remaining balance of the excess investment earnings to the United States. 395- D. Notwithstanding any provision of this Section, in the event that there is filed witb the Treasurer written instructions directing the Treasurer to cease compliance with this Section and if such written instructions are accompanied by the opinion of Band Counsel to the effect that such cessation shall not adversely affect the exemption of interest on the Pefunding Bonds f ^om Federal lnccme taxation, all amounts on deposit in the Investment Earnings Account and the Excess Investment Earnings Accrunt shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund and applied to the payment of debt service on the bonds on the next succeeding interest payment date, the investment Earnings Account and the Excess Investment Earnings Account shall ue closed and this Section shal. be deemed to be and shall be inapplicable. Thereafter, the Treasurer shall, except as otherwise ;rovided herein, at least annually transfer all Interest or 'ncome received by the Treasurer on investment of any fund or account established hereunder to the Redemption Fund to be applied to the payment of debt service on the Refunding Bonds on the next succeeding interest payment date. E. The term •excess investment earnings' means the sum of (a) the excess of (i) the aggregat,t amount earned (taking into account any gain or loss on the disposit4on of a nonpurpose Investment) on all nonpurpose investments (other than nonpurpose invt ;tments attribu- table to an excess described In this clause (a) and other than nonpurpose investments deposited in the Redemption Fund), over (ii) the amount which would have been earned if all nonpurpose invest- ments were invested at a rate equal to the yield of the bonds, plus (b) any Income attributable to the excess described in clause (a), and the term "nonpurpose investment" means any security, obligation (other than an obligation the interest on which is exempt from Federal income taxation), annuity contract or other investment property which is acquired with the gross proceeds of the Refunding Bonds and which is not acouired in order to carry out the governmen- tal purpose of the Refundin5 Bonds. SECTION 30. Early Issuance Prohibition. The City shall assure th4t five percent or e net procee s of the Refunding Bonds are spent within thirty 30) days after the date of delivery of the Refunding Bonds to carry out the gover'unental purpose of the Refunding Bonds, and that ail of the net proceeds of the Refunding Bonds are spent within three (3) years of the date of delivery of the Refunding Bonds to carry out the governmental purpose of the Refunding Bonds. Amounts used for redemption of the Refunding Bonds shall be deemed to be amounts used to carry out the governmental purpose of the Refunding Bonds within the meaning of the preceding sentence. SECTION 31. No Federal Guarantee. The City shall take no action nor permit nor sufter any action o e .aken if the result of the same would cause the Refunding Bonds to be a Federally guaranteed obligation within the meaning of Section 103(h) of the Code. Any section reference in this Resolution to the Code shall be deemed to be and shall refer to any section of similar import enacted in lieu or in amendment of such section or contained in any internal revenue code enacted in lieu of the lntrrnal Revenue Code of 1954. 3 S� ATTEST: 0 CiTv OF RANCHO CUCAHONOA STALE OF CALIFORNIA RAYlRC —'� -- CITY OF RANM CUCAaW.A STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 32. bnendment, Without the consent of the bsndowners, the City hereafter any aftfl� this ' Resolution to add, modify or delete provisions if the same is neeessar?? or desirable, in the opinion of Bond t Counsel to assure the ".1100 Of inUraat on the Refunding Bonds from Federal income tASation. SECTION 33. Oesi nation of lrnnsrer A ant and Re istrar. The BANK OF Transfer Agent, Paying Agent amf P designated 891strar with r spect to these and te Refunding Bonds tbe issued. SECTION 34, Preliminar Orfictal statvaent. The Preliminary Official Statement, as prepare an sum E2dr—is ne ally approved and adopted, and the "ecu. Hon and dis:ribctlOn Is hereby +athorlted. A copy of raid Preliminary Official Statement shall by '.ent or, file with the transcript of these withethencon and tauthorizedCtoyapprovera, of Bond Counsel,sis hereby Final Official Statement at er prior to the bend closing. APPROVED and ADDPTEO this _._, day of 1985 ATTEST: 0 CiTv OF RANCHO CUCAHONOA STALE OF CALIFORNIA RAYlRC —'� -- CITY OF RANM CUCAaW.A STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION P.O. 0 � r 7(,p RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, MING AWARD FOR SALE OF REFUNDING BONDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISH- MENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CiTY OF RANCHO CUCMgNGA, CALIFORNIA, did previously undertake proceedings and confirm assessments in a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the •Municipal Improvement Act of 19130, being Oivision 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Assessment District'); and WMFREAS, ioprovenient bonds representing the unpaid assessments within said Assessment District were issued and sold to the manner provided in the •Improvement Bond Act of 19150, being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and, WMCREAS, at this time, the City is desirous of initiating proceedings to refund all outstanding Improvement bonds pursuant to the "Refunding Act of 1981 for 1915 Tmprovmeat Act Bonds', being Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said refunding bonds and district to be designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1R (kEFUNDING) (rereinafter referred to as the 'Refunding District'); and, WHEREAS, there has now been received, in proper form, a Purchase Agreement (herein- after the - proposal') for the purchase of said refunding bonds to issue under said proceedings, which is considered to best serve the interests of owners of land Included within the Refunding District and should be accepted. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MSREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SEC71011 2. That the proposal received from STORE 6 YOUNGBERG for the purchase of refunding bonds representing unpaid reassessments In said Refunding District is hereby accepted and approved. SECTION 3 That said sale is subiect to all the terms and conditions as set forth in the Resolution of Issuance and in the accepted proposal. SECTION a That the Treasurer be, and hereby Is, directed to have the refunding bonds printed immediately and said Treasurer shall then have said refunding bonds signed end delivtred upon receipt of the amount of monies due pursuant to said proposal erA upon the performance of all the conditions as set forth in the proposal. SECTION S. That the interest rate or rates on said refunding bonds be, and the same hereby is fixed at the rate or rates as set forth to sold accepted pro' osal . MAIM SECTION 6. That the Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to keen a redemption fund designated by tha name of the proceedings, into which he shall place all sums receivcd for the collection of the reassessments and the interest thereon, together with all penalties, if awplicabls, thereon and from which he shall disburse such funds to the registered owner. Under no c4rcumstances shall the said bonds or interest thereon be paid out of any other fund except as provided by law. Said fund shall be known as the REDEMPTION FUND, and shall be designated by the name of this Refunding District. SECTION 7. That the Treasurer shall transfer monies is necessary from the SPECIAL RESERVE FUND in the manner and form as authorized by law. APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: M I Y 1 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA day of , !Q%. FAVOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA y t w �t H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA °s MEMORANDUM rc- �,k DAT& Merub 20, 1986 SOt Ilq n and Members of City Council PROM: Leuven N. Westerman. City Manager 80878Cyt CIVIC CEnTLR FLAME The Task Porce working on the Civic Center is now ready to toward its reccamandation to the City Council for review and pro.osaing. It is reeou nded that the City Council consider the matter at an adjourned meting rather tbao as a part of our regular council business. That will enable the Council to spend the necessary swount of tima to review all aspects of the proposed Civic Cent* Plan. It is recocuanded that the adjourned seating be scheduled within the next two weeks, to order that the City may proceed with the advent* stages of design of the Public 8afaty /Civle Center facility. LMW /kep `k N is i:� w r f t ANNEXATION NO. 8S -1 TO MELLO -ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 FOR DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MARCH 1986 Engineer s Tax Apportionment Report Mallo -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1962 290 South Nxthekn BJd- SLLo 100. NxMUIm Cdkmla 92805 • (7W1775740 • rW) 9244631 a e I ANNEXATION NO. W -1 TO MELLO -ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94 -1 DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jon D. Mlkels, Mayor Richard M. Dahl, Mayor Pro Tem Counollmembers Charles J Buqust, II PamNs Wright Jeff King Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Lloyd B Hubbs, City Engineer Professional Services: Special Counsel: Law Offices of F. MacKenzie Brown Engineer -of -Work: Willdan Associates _ cs :E ^ 1 - f~�� t TABLE OF CONTENTS ■ c 4L_ :.:X PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 11 DESCRiPT1ON Of FACILITIES 3 111 BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT 6 IV RATE AND METHOD OF APPORYIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX 10 A. Rate of Spacial Tax B. Gross Area C. Spatial Tax Rata Reduction D Annexation Areas V GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 11 A. Substitution FacilitleI S. Bonds C Appeals and Interpretation Procedure V1 EXHIBIT A 13 A. BoundarV Map B Ownership Voter Listing ■ c 4L_ :.:X h' i A i COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ANNEXATION REPORT N.ELLO -RUGS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 I. INTRODUCTION WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency ", desires to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to G1e provisions of the Mall* -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title S of the Gov- ernment Code of the State of California, and specifically Artielz 2 5 thereof. The existing Commu:uty Facilities Vistrict has been daslgnstwd as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAG°_ SYSTEM) hereinafter refarred to as the "District", and, WHEREAS, the area Propnsed to be annexed shall be known and designated as: ♦NNEXATION NO W -1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) hereinafter referred to as the "annexed territory"; and, WHEREAS, this legislative body has formally ordered the Preparation of an Annexation Report, said Report to generally contain the following: A general des.ription of territory Included in the existing District; 1 D. general description of territory proposed to be annaxed to said existing District; C. a description of the public capital facilities and /or services, If applicable, provided in the existing District; D. a deccription of the public capital facilities and /or services, r ' If applicable, to be provided In the territory proposed to be _ ,nnoxsd, Including a plan for sharing facilities that will be Provided In ccrmron vith the existing District and territory proposed for annexation; E. General description of spacisl taxes to be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed to pay for said public fa- cilities. A spacial tax to pay for public facilities financed with bonds may be adjusted as authorized by Section 53339.2; and F a description of any alteration In the spacial tax, If applica- ble, by reason of the annexation NON, THEREFORE, 1, WILLIAM STOOKEY. authorized representative of Wllldan Associates, the appointed responsible officer of parson directed to prepare the Annexation Report, pursuant to %ne provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, l Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Coda of the State o: Callfornis, do hereby submit the following data. 2 r 1 i S i. - It. DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES A Community Facllltiee District may provide for the punhasa con - structlor., expansion or rehabilitation of any real or other tangible prop- ' erty with an estimated useful life of five years or longer, which Is neces- sary to meat increased demands placed upon twat agencbl as a result of :nhabllltation occurring within th. District. A. A general description of the facilities within the existing District Is as follows: 1. PRIMARY DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO SERVE ZONES A AND 0 Debris Basin The construction of flood control retention and water reclamation basin Improvements in the unincorporated area north of the City Day Creek Major flood control channel Improvement existing from the debris basin to the southerly boundary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Fourth Stroet). 2. JOINT COOPERATIVE IMPROVEMENTS In cooperation and coordination with the City of Ontario, assistance shall be provided for the construction of the fol- lowing: Day Creak Channel Improvements. - S i. - 1 1 1 Etlwanda Channel Improvements. - jYineville Basin Flood control retention and water reclamation basin improve. Monts. RWerslds Basin Flood . ontrol retention and water reclamation Improvements. The above Improvements are :xatcd outside of the Incor- Forated limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga but are necessary to serve the properties and development within said City. 3. FEDERALLY - AMSTED FACILITIES The construction of certain Day Creak spreading grounds and the Day Creak Basin, only upon the condition that cer- tain federal Interest -free loans are obtained, Including the acquisition of rights -of -way and land, as necessary, MOW - ing other facilities, appurtenances and all Incidental ex- panses. 8. A general description of the facilities proposed to be fi- nanced In the annexed tar, Itory, is as follows.. No new facilities are Proposed for the area to be annexed and the fsallltias as set forth within the existing District can serve the Property and territory within the area of annexation. 4 Based upon the above, It Is my opinion that veld fasllltlos are those, that ana necessary to most Increased demands placed upon the local Agency as a result of development 'L• and /or rehobllltat on occurring within the boundaries of the District. - •- WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ByG� _• Wililam C. Stookey 5 Ill. BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT A. The boundaries of the existing District are those properties and parcels when facilities are authorized to be provided and In which special taxes may be levied in order to pay for the costs and expenses of said faciaties LEGAL DESCRIPTION The legal description of the boundary of the project area dasignst- ed as Msllo Roos Community Facilities District No. 84.1 Is as fol- lows: All that certain real property In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino State of California described as follows: Beginning at an angle point In the city limit line of sold Rancho Cucamonga as said city limit line exists February 1, ISM, said point being the intersection of the rnterline of Etiwanda Avenue and the centerline of Fourth Street: thence Wtsterly along the Southerly city limit line of said city being the centerline of said Fourth Street, 10,6110 feet to the centerline of Milliken Avenue; thence leaving said city limit h. i and Northerly along the center- flop of said Milliken Avenue, 21,600 fast to the centerline of High- land Avenue, cald Intersection being an angle point In the North- erly city limit line of said city as said city limit line exists Febru- ary 1, ISM; thance Easterly and Northerly along sold city limit line and the centerline of said Highland Avenue and Hanley Avenue to the centerline of 24th Street: thence Easterly along the center- line of said 24th Street and said city limit Ilne 1,320 feet to the prolongation of the Easterly line of tat 3. Block C, Etiwanda Colo- ny Lands as sh-. n on a map recorded in Book 2, Page 24 of Maps, rscor:nt of said County; thence leaving said city limit line 6 Southerly and generally parallel to sold ESlwanda Avenue a dis- tance of 9,100 fast along 'said prolongation and the following sever- &I courses: the Easterly line of Lots 3, 6, 11 and 14 In said Block C and the Southerly prolongation they %of; the Easterly line of Lots 3, 6, 11, and 14 In Black 0 and the Southerly prolongation there- of; the Easterly line of Lose 3, 6, 11, and 14 In Block I and the Southerly prolongation thereof; and the Easterly line c4 Lots 3 and ''. { 6 In Block J to the Northerly line of the land of Southern pacific tRailroad Company, said Northerly lines being distant Not 4harly 125 i fast from the centerline of the rallioad right -of -way 100 fast wide; thence Westerly along said Norther.y ling 1,320 fast to the e,nter- line of sold Manley Avenue; there@ Southerly along said centerline and the Southerly prolongation thereof 2 CW fast to the Southerly line of Lot 4, Block S ,f said Etiwsnda Calory Lands; thence East i� 1,320 fast along the Southerly line o; said Lot 4 and not 3 in said Block S to the Northeast corner of Lot 6 of said Block 5, thence South generally parallel with the centerline of said Etlwanda Ave- ; nue, 3 670 Past along the Easterly line of Lots 6, 11, snu 14 In said bfo.,ko, the Saetarly line of Lots it through 20 Inclustvo of Block 6, Etiwanda Cactus Acres as shown on a map recorded In Look 19, Phg< 63 of Maps, records of cald County and the South- erly prolongatlon theniot to the Southeasterly right -of -way lino of the Devore Freeway (sUle Highway 31); thence Southwesterly 1,830 feet slung the Southeasterly right -of -way line to the westerly line of Lot 8 of the subdivision of part of the North h- of the North half of the Northeast one quarlar of Sectlon 8, Township 1 South, Rants 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian, as shown on a map recorded In Book 16, Pago 36 of Maps, records of said County; thence Sc..th 200 fast along said Wester;V fine of Lot 8 is the Southerly line of said map of subdivision: thence East 2,68) fast along last said Southerly line to the centerline of Etiwands Ave - vus; thence Southerly 9,600 fast along last said eanteriine to the -. Point of beginning. l; r fPoy�: 1 i Excepting therefrom that certain area described 39 follows: Beginn'ng at the contorting Intersoction of Rochestr- Avenue and Base Line Avenue; thence East along the centerline of eald Base Line Avenue, 920 feet to the Northerly prolongation of Uie East line of Tract 8806 as shown on a mcp recorded in Book 130, pages 38 and 39 of Maps. In the Office of the County Recorder of aafd county; thence Southerly 4,089 feet, generally parallel with the centerline of said Rochester Avenue along the Easterly ling of rract 8806, Tract 8805, and Tract 8369 recorded respectivoly in Book 130 Pages 38 and 39. Book 123 Pages 61 and 62, and Book 113 Pages 38 and 39 In Me Office of the County Recorder of said County, to 'he Southerly right -of -way ling of Effon Street: thence West 23 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 69 of said Tract 8369; thence South 110.80 to the Southeast corner of said Lot: thence host 40 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot to the Easterly right-of-way line of Hyssop Drive thence Southerly 838 feet along the utterly line of said Hyssop Drive and the Southerly prolongs - tion thereof to the Southeast corner of Lot 1 of said Tract 8369; thence hest £0.7 feet to he centorhne of said Rochester Avenue; thence North 4,927 feat to the Point of Bsgmrting Curtaining an area of 4 607 42 acres more or less For particulars reference is made to a map previously ap- proved and on file in the office of the City Clerk. A The Foundaries of the property in the annexed territory are those properties and Darters where facilities are au- thorized to be ^rovided and in which special tates may be levied in order to pa+ for the costs and expenses of said 8 11 facilities. A legal description of the area of the annexed tea ritory is as follows: 9 Beginning at the arterlins Intersection o: Highland Avenue 1 (66 feet wide) and Milliken Aveni,e (66 feet wide); thence Northerly along the anterlins of said Milliken Avenue 2,632 :1 feet to the North line of the Southwest one quarter of Sec- , tion 30. Township 1 North, Range 6 West, San Bernardino 31 Meridian; thence East along said line and the North line of the Southeast one quarter of Sccticn 30, 4,034 feet to the centerline of Rochester Avenue (60 feet wide); thence South along the centarlino of paid Ro_hestar Avenue 2,640 feet to 1 the centerline of Highland Avenue; thence West along the centerline of said Higtiland Avenue 4,018 feet to the point 1 of beginning Containing an area of 245.00 gross acres, more or less. 9 ly RATE AN) METHOD OF APPORTIONatENT OF SPEGI L AX T The Resolution of Intention to Annex generally alts forth the rate and apporUOnn�cnt Of the special tax to allow each hams ort ore resident to estimate the annual amount that would be nqulnd for payment. A For particulars as to the me and method of in the ax:sUrg Dlstriet, reference is apportionment lathed hereto and InrorpGrated he •fin ba y Nitj �e Exhibit � at- 0 For particulars as to the rate and seethed of appeftionee In the ed hereto territory. tefrrence Is madr"ty exhibit At and incorporated herein by this reference. O Any alterations in the special is%. if applicable. an herein- There set forth as follows; Than b no Proposed adivatment In the tax rate for Me an- nexed territory and Is Proposed the same tax as set north fn Exhibit A W M levied in the an vxed territory. D. A higher special tax may be levied to Pay for District facilities tnetncrd with bonds to cc*Ffn&at, for Paid principal and me pnvloiisly, rest within the annexation area for the Awl collection year of igM.l9S7 10 i iV. GENERAL 7 _RNS AND CONDITIONS iA. SUBSTITUTION FACILITIES iThe description of the public capital facilities, as set forth heroin. Is general In Its nature. The final nature and location of Improve- ments and facilities will be determined upon the preparation of fi- nal plans and specifications. The final plans may show substitutes iin lieu of or modification to the proposed work In order to accom- plish the works of improvement, and any such substitution shall inot be a change or modification In the proceedings as long at the facilities provide a service substantially similar to that as set forth ! i in this Report B BONDS iIn ardor to finance the public capital facilities as set fcrth in this Annexation Report, It is necessary that bonds be issued pursuant ito the terms, conditions and authoritatlon as set forth In the Com- munity Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2.5, Division 2, Title i5 of tho Government Code of the Stnte of California, commencing with Section 53311 thereof, and sp"ificelly Article 5 thersir. C APPEALS AND INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount or fa -mule of the spacial tax is in error may file o notice with the Agency ap- paaling the levy of the special tax An appeals panel of three members as appointed by the Agency, will then meet and promptly review the appeal and, If necessary, meet with the applicant. if the findings of the Appeals Board verify that the tax should be modified or changed. a recommendation at that time will be made to 11 P I the Agency; and. as appropriate, the spacial tax levy shall be corrected. If applicable ro any case, a refund shall be granted. Interpretations may be made by the Agency by resolution for pur- poses of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity as it relates to any category, =one, rate, or definition applicable to these proceedings. It is In my opinion that the s?et - -isl tax rate and method of appor- tionment, as above set forth, is fair and equitablo, uniformly ap- plied, and not discriminatory or arbitrary 12 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES ray: William C Stookey CITY OF AaNLNO CUCAMONGA ANNEXATION NO. 88 -1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 84.1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) _XHI01T A The Community Facilities District has been divided into two zones: Zone A: General areas to be served by the drainage facilities exclusive of Zone b Zone 0: A limited area, being only partially served by drainage fa- cilities Zone B consists of those properties bounded on the south by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by Rochester Avonve, an the north by Base Line Road, and on the wasi by the prolongation of Milliken Avenue. Th rata, method and fa-rnu /a for the levy of the special tax for the ro- spective zones being lone A and Zone 0 Is as follows, based tpon a bond amount not to •xcud $20,225,000 payable over a period of years not to exceed 20 years 70NE A: NOT TO EXCEED $550.00 PER ACRE ZONE B NOT TO EXCEED $550.00 PER ACRE FOR 190 ACRES At sscti time as tFe final drainage plan Is ostabllahod for Zone S. only those properties that drain Into the Bay Croal. Channel shall be subject to the special drainage fee. Areas Of Zone B in excess of 150 acres that do drain into the Day Creek Channel shall be subject to a drainage fee The above spne'al tax rata, method, . d apportionment shall be as set forth aboya for the exist.'ng District as well as the area proposed to be annexed 13 11 1! - -�zz B • L of lot -Lee x lc I •. :� ei ■ Z � � � CI I `! .ice I \\ •� 1 .� I fu _ •L z < c a .o i, i Pi iPiie 4n_ 99 t I •� a. is vP � 9Pi P�il3cFci �i t 0 ai JI My i iOri 'P•iiaVio iv i 0 »i MS w u_ t u 7 I li ° I I 0 N I i P i°.. JttOt »Ji lJ :J :y0 �J ui.V ri acc tO.i Crt irC °n iwi O�i J.•i J.i. r� Imo" VOJ v2 YY V.z'V rV VO° viU V VFW ��V n.<il OJ OO OOy LO'JI 09 >OV VO 'a =V nom" il�V n.y L2"1 V.V a.. °00 iOi .°YOZ NOy ate" NO,i°• MOB n°y NOS nOy SOZ ar"1 i02 Ow 's Yni ini� FO r °i r °i Oi �.e. `s so• »„i sue' .2-:i IttZ iii .'.mow u °��i.� •1' F N � N N N n n I'a I w P I a I n . '•':.:'O • tae :r% ••Ic 1. f. ,1 ..... GTL.' *�Cl�f ! .";... i:.�ullf:�iT: ;s p> YY I � p o ii i u : o o o of o o°o o p � � .J. V > is ::r t o p o: o o:�t a:p Y:� YaV I p �3 O-W °w� — °.'. °ww FMj�u�;r in Yr � 3aa �F° °emu (rip Y{i >Op ••OV YJJ Yy'J, YJy r °NJ O�J °VY VY Jt ��V �JFJ i` Mi• fi � Ri+ saY i1Y jtiva a u iwY u O R �i > p R iry 3. i'oOoN i N N{II Y Re r 39 Y J g.0 900, 2.0! 2. yOY Yf po -J R°O:o4 I°•M1u I 7 N N ^ 0 N o N S N o o N e e ry ry o o N e Y M � ^ LIT: .^ �! .l:�N ..r..a : ^:i4Jii:ir.i Z ?.J':^ .fr. • V a a ' V r Y of N P �i+ o osf io n NS i. 0 e i i 0 i i h e J e°1 b r� f � V Y V » O Y M N Y Y Y L;y VP1 F F VPI C y r P IIF^^ M o ^P M ^ A CPN L roF a as .o ^o� ^o roN NOV! .�. 'y e i i 0 i i h e J 777 fate N-atto A. *•San 81wdu .CA 92415 -0770• Afal 3%bHlk 387 -8300 March 17, 1986 Nilldan Associates 290 S Anaheim Blvd., Suite 199 Anaheim, CA 92805 ATIN: Sandra Neeley Dear Sandra, 1 GCR M.E B. JACOBSEN n,ena, a vat, pmmD MAR 1 a 1986 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES The "ma of proposed annexation no. 86-1 to the Hello-Roos Cozaunity Facilities District No. 00 -1, contains no registered Voters as of March 17, 1986. The two voters that vote previously thought to reside in the ores of annexation actually reside on the east side of Rochester Ave and therefore have been placed in the proper precinct. If va car. be of further assistance, pleas: vntact our office. Sinrerely, GiPANE 8 JACOBSEN Registrar of Voters ��l /,e GGge[ral'i�— Bay Aranda Deputy Registrar of Voters GBJ,RAtsb PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES March 1986 COl MITY DEVEWPM= BLOC[ CRANr PROGRAM C1YY OF RANCHO COCAMCNCA Jam D. Mitels. Mayor Charles J. Duque[ II, CouncLlme ber Richard M. Dahl, Councilutaber Jet[rq Ring, Co=cil2mber Peels J. Wright, Cuunclla ber MARCH, 1986 TABLE Of COKTMs Section PaQa I. IntrodocLion 1 II. Standard Form 424 2 III. Preliminary Statement of Comunity Objectives 3 A. Description and Asessment of . Ilse of Previous CDBC 3 Entitlement Funds B. Coo7rehensive Strategy /Statement of Community 7 Objectives IV. Covunity Development Program A. Project Descriptions B Kapa V. Housing Assistance Plan and Housing Action Program VI. Citizen Participation Hequirpments VII. Certifications I 1 I� r Olt • a� I9 Z I` I. INTRODUCTION Section 570.2 of the Consolidated Community Development Block Grant Regulations identifies the primary objective of the Community Development Block Grant Program as "the development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a suitable living eivironment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persona of low and moderate income ". The three-year Community Development and Hooting Plan and the one-year Community Development Pro,lram, which together comprise the subatance of this application, have been prepared to address this primary goal: ' The needs identified center on the major problems facing the pockets of older development within the larger, rapidly growing City; The strategy developed by the City is designed to: (1) focus efforts within these target atess; (2) upgrade the existing housing stock; and (3) improve inadequate and substandard public Improvements. With this approach, the City anticipates meeting the goals of the CDBG program, including eliminatica of blighting influences, preventing the spread of blight and deterioration, end supporting the Investment of public and private funds in rehabilitation. As required by federal law ( Section 570.301 of the regulations), the Preliminary Statement of Commrnity Objectives was made available for public review prior to the public hearing held March 19, 1986, at 7:30 p.m, in the Lions Community Center in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. At that time, the City Council will consider public comment on the community objectives and select same of them for funding in 1986/87 Legal notices and display advertisements were published in the Daily Rep rt on March 7 , 1986, to inform citizens of the hearing and solicit their input. i t w _z II. SF 424 U 1977 •t•�lat PNWaI Inr, al, val ! YarY /.,rWGr6 /r.a rr.r.rr lH FEDERAL ASSISTANCE i cars a d t • 4.CIi0n ES r� r M a p J! y taw. Y. ❑ a4Rt41= cr c= ICA3 / l nti ar. - ❑ tux er f2= aim a ..r.l •rlwrJNrr4nr,(In 1 r(ap4a u.aartl RtI.tYlLallai, on City of Ranebo Cueaenga at4 ftn , Plannln, Division . at.ana b t. Boa 807 21 It 81 a trr tncho Cucamonga • San Z!rnnrd rru la r.qa L m . Lallfornla aij�r 9!730 / Co mlt Y Development Otto Krouttl I a•r ow.. wt (714) 989 -181 Block Crant x:m.nu w mfr c n nr sa n rrr¢ v arwtcrtriatrsupr 1. Housing Rehabilitation s p.IrM•.i +v 2. Turner avenue widening a• -_- .."",,,,y �'� y 3. Southwest Cucamonga Street Ietrovemeats 4. Arrow Route Improvements 5. Senior Shared Housing 6, Southwest Cucamonga Part Actptisition ' .per✓. b. F 1 UU arrR is a>•u+rara aUrtYr or.. • . _ _ w mom. c+„ t�-�J tJr r.,fl,rYYNI V alpla d rtat.mr an11Q ttt��yma�v m erm. tp rowan n rtre m arne.uot rr..Yl War I(iraR1 fir. (.agprw iatt�r City of Rancho Cucamon 0 ` Cucamonga 65.500 J n rmrpsm ruaoro to comnc wra aaatcts on n rtac m a...c[ u mr.w . tmpLa t a . unrs a rata ii o ` •m tsl.rn. n 35 35 a ✓L t�o.trt Marto 12. rue.ma ra a Lrtaaaa aaacr r n 86 6 1 B-86 7C- a'.6 -0SSb M:..w r ro tam[ aHousing b Crban Development. Ics Angeles. Ca. 90015 -go tr a rtmvaar ra•tr aw....ar+. r rt .etaxaar ....rr . r pq td r ❑ tntrwa a..w.rr rrrrawp m So. Gallornla Asn. of Cweraunts ❑ rtt•r► r r rtr ptrr e r o•. m San Perturdl.mo Amof Coverncaons ❑ 13 ... .. a ❑ ❑ a a men tact r9 pan . r�teta a�Ippt. Jeffre7 Zing atltt mono _Q a" • Wu Mayor n u asotcr tupi i �rprrtry r. �. w 'Anrm n s opwuwrmap• tppr ai rstpuna ttm¢ � a nxw ..w.rana I taarp.cuto. s aaoaasa x Itm..a u.rr rd�t � [Q ] m rD a arms n mil n T I yh t1 O a QRtIIr • anon m m< t<'wr/CS ISM t.J HMw,.d rM�. �...1 Iry� {L�IQt �iriVt ��Qatb ID� a uo a n .wan aaem p i turua � � w ItnOYI I�crler Y.ryM Y.r.a��Itralr Lr,aa tb� /tY�. w1 �ntY4. a.aa MO •t•�lat PNWaI Inr, al, val ! YarY /.,rWGr6 /r.a rr.r.rr lH f1 to III. Preliminary Statement cot l Iz of Community Objectives III. ^C.`LIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES A. DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF USE OF PREVIOUS CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUNDS 1. Fiscal Year 1982 -83 In 1982 -83 the City received $360,000.00 which was allocated to the following program.: • Housing Rehabilitation Program: $ 84,000.00 • Neighborhood Center Expansion: 81,000.00 • North Tow:. Street Improvements: 120,000.00 (Center and Maxine Streets) • Contingency 17,387.00 • Local Costa of Program Implementation 57,617.00 The City's community development objectives for 1982 -83 included the following: I. To develip a program capable of eliminating and preventing slums, blight, and conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare that can aid in preserving housing stock for people of low and moderate income. It. Continue City efforts to eliminate conditions which are detrimental to health, safety, and pu li c welfare, alleviate physical and economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization and improve the quality of community services. 111. To expand and improve the quantity and quality of community services, proviae needed neighborhood and community facilities end reduce the isolation of enior citizens living within the City. The programs funded by the City for 1982 -83 are consistent with the City's objectives. The housing rehabilitation program directly meets the need addreaoed in Ob -active 1; the North Town street improvements satisfy Objective II; the neighborhood center expansion carries nut Objectiva I11. The programs are also consistent with the broad national objectives specified in he "maximum feasible priority" curtlfication. The housing rchabli(tation program is intended to impro. substandard housing, thus eliminating clams and blighting in:luence. Participation in the program is also limited to lover income honeeholds, or families with senior citizen or handicapped parsons as heads of household. The neighborhood center expansion is targeted to senior citizens in the City. The street improvements will directly benefit residents of the North Town target area, a majority of whose residents are lover income. 2. Fiscal Year 1983 -84 In 1933 -84 the City received a total of $437,000.00 in Community 7rielopment Block Grant funds which were allocated as follows: 3 • Housing Rehabilitation Program $ 70,000 00 ' Neighborhood Center Expansion 291,000.00 ' Fair Hnwaing Services 5,000.01 ' Contingency 5,000.00 ' Local Costs of Program Implementation 60,000.00 The City's community development objectives for 1983 -84 were similar to Objectives 1 and III from 1982 -83: To develop a program capable of eliminating and preventing slums, blight, and conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare that can aid in preserving housing stock for people of low and moderate income. II. To expand and improve the quantity and quality of co ®unity services, provide needed neighborhood and community facilities and reduce the isolation of senior citizens living within the City. The Housing Rehabilitation and Neighborhood Center Expansion programs are consistent with Objectives I and II, respectively. The Fair Housing Set-,ices program servea to eliminate and prevent conditions detrimental to health, safety and public velfarn as identified in Objective I. In tens of consistency with the national "maximum feasible priority" objective, refer to the discussion above regarding the 1982 -83 program. In addition, the Fair Housing Services program providus mediation services in landlord /tenant disputes. The renolution of such conflict benefits low and moderate income families. T'ne project also provides information a•.d affirmative support for state and federal Fair Housing Laws, consistent with Section 570.601(6) of the regulations. 3 Fiscal Year 1984 -85 In 1984 -85, Rancho Cucamonga received $467,000.00 in Cummunity Development Block Grant funds which were allocated as follows: ' Housing Rehabilitation Program $ 60,000.00 ° Fair Housing Sera ices 6,000.00 ' North Town Park S.te Acquisition 150,000.00 ' North Town Street Improvements Phase 150,000.00 ' North Town Street Improvement Planning, Phase 15,000.00 • Contingency 15,000.00 ' Local Coats of Program Implementation 71,050.00 The adopted community development objectives for 1984 -85 were: I. To eliminate and prevent slums and blight and conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare whale preserving the housing stock for people of Lou and moderate income. 4 All of the projects are consistent with the national objective of giving "maximum feasible priority" to projects that benefit low and moderate income households and /or eliminate alums and blighting conditions. Rehabilitation loans and grants are available only to lower income households. The North Tow area in which all of the capital improvement projects are located has over 512 of its residents in the lover incomu category. Well over 515 of the Cito's 1984 -85 Community Development 3lock Grant expendimares directly benefitted lover income hou holds. 4. Fiscal Year 1985 -86 In 1985 -86 (the current program year), Rancho Cucamonga received $473,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds which were allocated as follows: • Mousing Rehabilitation Loan /Grant Pcogran S 80,000.00 1 150,000.00 • North Town Streets - Belmont /Acacia 1I. To provide information and affirmative support for the Fair Construction Housing laws of the State and federal governments, in support of 1 the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent • Future Projects home in a suitable living environment. • Contracts /Administration III. To provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities in low • Program Management and moderate income neighborhoods in order to support ` rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the needs of 1 the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities will improve the living environment In the surrounding low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention ,1 and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. IV. To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide 1 street improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements is being given to y areas whose residents are predominantly low and moderate income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus 1 r improving the living environment. '! The Hc-ung Rehabiliration Program is consistent with the first objective, Fair Housing Services implements the second objective, North Tam Park implements the third objective, and both North T n Street improvement projects address the fourth objective. All of the projects are consistent with the national objective of giving "maximum feasible priority" to projects that benefit low and moderate income households and /or eliminate alums and blighting conditions. Rehabilitation loans and grants are available only to lower income households. The North Tow area in which all of the capital improvement projects are located has over 512 of its residents in the lover incomu category. Well over 515 of the Cito's 1984 -85 Community Development 3lock Grant expendimares directly benefitted lover income hou holds. 4. Fiscal Year 1985 -86 In 1985 -86 (the current program year), Rancho Cucamonga received $473,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds which were allocated as follows: • Mousing Rehabilitation Loan /Grant Pcogran S 80,000.00 • North Town Park - Development 150,000.00 • North Town Streets - Belmont /Acacia Construction 153,000.00 • Handicap Signs 5,000.00 • Future Projects 10,000.00 • Contracts /Administration 26,000.00 • Program Management 42,000.00 • Pair Housing Services 7,000.00 The adopted community objectives for 1985 -86 are: I. To eliminate and prevent slma and blight ant. conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare while preserving the housing stock for paople of low and moderate income. I1. To provide information and affirmative supsort for the Fair Housing lava of the State and Federal governments. in support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment. III. To provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities in low and moderate income neighborhoods in order to support rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities will improve the living environment in the surrounding low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. 1V To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements to being given to areas whose residents are predominantly low and moderate income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus Improving the living environment. The Housing Rehabilitation Loan /Grant Program is consistent with Objectives I and I1. The Fair Housing Services program serves to eliminate and prevent conditions detrimental to public health, safety and welfare as identified in Objective 1. A program such as Fair Housing Services also provides mediation assistance in landlord /tenant disputes. This assistance benefits low and mruferate income hiusehoids. The program also provides information and affirmative support for State and Federal Fair Housing Laws, consistent with Section 570.601(6) of the regulations. Finally, the Fair Housing Services program is cunsistent with the national "maximum feasible priority" objective. The North Town Park project addresses Objective Ill and the North Town Streets and He dicapped Signs programs atdrsae Objective IV. B. COMPREHENSivE STRATEGY (5TATPYENT of comituNin owwr1Vfs) Although the exact amount of the 1936 -87 grant is not known, it is estimated to be approximately $340,000. Funding of all prujects submitted to the City for consideration in 1986 -87 would cost approximately $1,106,000. The following statement of coaaueity objectives and programs reflects the priorities of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga established at a public hearing held for the purpose on March 19, 1986, (see Section V1). City policy regarding the CDBC program is to designate at least 51 percent of the entitlement funds each year for programs which directly benefit persons of low and moderate Income. 1. Housing Maintenance and Rehabilitation (existing program) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need to continue City efforts to improve existing housing stock that does not meet building or safety code requirements yet is banically sound and can, with some improvement efforts, continue to serve the housing needs of the City. Substandard units are not concentrated in one area but are scattered in small neighborhoods throughout the City. Objective: To eliminate and prevent slum and blight and conditions detrimental to bealths safety and public welfare while preserving the housing stack for people of low and moderate income. This is in direct compliance with the national objective of eliminating slums and blight. Only low and moderate income households are eligible for loans or grants, which is also in accord with the Federal regulatiins. Programs: The existing Housing Rehabilitation Program offers deferred loans and below- market interest rate home loans to penmejfamilies of low -or- moderate income and home improvement grants for minor projects to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons throughout the City. Ihis program is managed by the San Bernardino County Office of Community Development through a contract with the Ctty. Funded activities include: ' Outreach /public information; ' Home improvement loans; and ' Home repair grants (senior citizen, disabled, handicapped persona). Housing maintenance and rehabilitation activities reflect the goals of the Housing Assistance P1 -i (H.A.P.). The rehabilitation goals In the H.A.P. are met through this program. In 1982/83. $84,000.00 of the City's Block Grant was allocated for this program and :1),000.00 was expended. In 1983/84 $70,000.00 was allocated and $42,000.00 was expended at the end of the year. All of the foods from the 1983/04 progran year have been expended. In 1984/859 $60,000.00 was allocste�, and $44,500 was expended. In 19P' /C60 $80,000 van allocated and to date approximately $65,000 has been spent. 2. Street Lproveaenb (am prog,ene) heeds Asaament Pindlog: There is • need for certain public lmprovtat*[s in predominantly Iw and moderate Jocose neighborhoods which have been targeted for rehabilitation asdstanre to prevent mad eliminate blight and deterioration. These improveacets weld reinforce private efforts and eliminate hazards to public health and safety. Two neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga have been certified by BBD as eligible for These types of taprovasents - North Town mad Soathwat Cucamonga. Objective: To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street fmprwements in areas targeted for h�iag rehabilitation assistants. Priority in these improvements is being given to areas whose residents are predominantly Iw and moderate intone and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards. thus ieproviag thu living environoent. These progress will further the national goals of eliminating alums and blight and privarily benefit lw, and moderate incoaa households. Progress: (a) Tamer Anna Widening (East Side) 26th Street to A.T. A S.Y. R.R. Crossing includes the construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights and, where needed, retaining walls to video the amt aide of Tamer Avenue to its altivate or as ultivate as current developue*t allows. The current project estivate is $225.00 which includes engineering and a 10 percent construction contingency. Tu.. a ,oc .,Bs not consider right- cf-way clearance. It most be notes that no less then three existing residences are noted to eneroae: upon the public right-of-way and would prohibit the altiaate videnieg of the street; other unsaactioned usages are also noted with(* the public right -of -way. However, possible right -of -way acquisition and associated costs will be oltigsted by designing the street at curb -to -curb width within the "toting eight -of -way. The improvesent of the vest side of Turner Avenue was funded through the Block Crest last year. (b) Southwast Cucamonga Street Improvements: The project involves the following streets north of Arrow Route between Sierra Hadre Avenge and Crave Avenue: Sierra Badre Avenue, Avenida Vejar, Placiw Coart and Via Carrillo. The proposed imprweeen[s include pavesumt rehabilitation, the construction of concrete curbs, gutters Bad sidewalks and the installation of street lignts. The current project estivate is $2956000 which covers B&2neerlog Bad construction costs only. The atrmte does vat cover design costs or possible right-of-way acquisition. 4. Carsitf Serwices (dew !rags) feels Asses a Finding There is a need to praride recreation facilities aceessible to persons ad families of law mad moderate Income is eligible law and =od= r* Income neighborhoods. The two areas which gasliff L 2a Comma¢ are bath Tars a- 'thoest Cacemazz. The acquisition and dera opmen-r of a pare is lk. wa was selected for finding in 1914115 and 1985136. Objective: TO provide nei4borhoad pasts and recreation facilities in lw, and moderate incone veighboeboods of Southwest Cmmwtqp is order to sapper[ rebabilicatim of these areas and in order to meet the sea=s of the residents. Creation of these centers for r ascuitf activities will faprove the living ne ronreat in the sarroodiag law and mdeate Iscame orfg.bosbmod and sspport the preseatisa and elfminatfoo of blighting conditions, as required •oder the national priorities. (e) Arras lode Iaq wsmzs. me proposed project ircledes W.eomr tae eomstructim of concrete curbs. Rnttevs and sileaalts and eke installation of street lights along Arrow Route ben -ven Gcawe and Sierra Madre Arcm e:. The esasest project estivate is $2W.00D which comers engineering ead eomstrm2im costs awl,. me esriate does net raver design oats our possible right - f-way acquisition. Hssrver, as with the Iarmer Avenue project, possible right- of-way acgcd ition and associated costs will be mtigated by desipaiag Arrow Rama at orb width within the existing righttid -asp. 3. fsblic Serwiens (em -dwif g prolf+d) Seeds Assessment Finding Tyre is a need for public service curveted at sp a al graces o! lass 'acme families and senior citizens. Spenifirullf, share is a need for assistance with bnosicg Liaoiniza ima prib)ena mad 1—ting I iag. Objective: TO provide CoamsC)rng and referral services to C'.We lower iaraae of sacictf and senior citizens who have special housing needs. trogm: (a) fair Nommimg services include laidlaWtmant mediation. defanitl foreclos:Qe and diacrzzivatinv oamselivg. The program is atzinistered by the Lalamd 'lsiution Board. The Board is ' regaestrag $7.5m - (b) Seal Shared Seesiza also operates undn• thv. arsspices of the 1-land Mediation Board. This program watcher up people who wart to share their borax with seait citizens in need of housing. Inland Mediation is requusing $6.000 for the Senior Shared Rousing , progas. 4. Carsitf Serwices (dew !rags) feels Asses a Finding There is a need to praride recreation facilities aceessible to persons ad families of law mad moderate Income is eligible law and =od= r* Income neighborhoods. The two areas which gasliff L 2a Comma¢ are bath Tars a- 'thoest Cacemazz. The acquisition and dera opmen-r of a pare is lk. wa was selected for finding in 1914115 and 1985136. Objective: TO provide nei4borhoad pasts and recreation facilities in lw, and moderate incone veighboeboods of Southwest Cmmwtqp is order to sapper[ rebabilicatim of these areas and in order to meet the sea=s of the residents. Creation of these centers for r ascuitf activities will faprove the living ne ronreat in the sarroodiag law and mdeate Iscame orfg.bosbmod and sspport the preseatisa and elfminatfoo of blighting conditions, as required •oder the national priorities. program: - ! Southwest Uacamonga part Site Acquisition: Acquisition-of a neighborhood pars in the Southwesr Ce uga target areas This- ! acquisition is expected to coat $=.000. This is a multi -year` program with only site acquisition proposed for this year— poeenrrml, sixes have been identified in the arcs. ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 ! to -IV: :Community - i3_ev_elopment z =Pr-ogram yp 9 y%% { ! ! Is If wl 1 Ya Nrwi•,N„T OI waHIwO M,OUwtYNYIWYfYf wwwwasupwn►tau✓run lwwwr I. NwW 01 MYtu,r City of Rancho CueatronRa i M6- -NC- 06- 05rNYYtIw B- 86•diC -06 -0556 • MONCT MItc -lM a 0100es M WLIC IUTt a C3 ow o%sai ltd/ O N Kw W.04' G.7 wrNwtln,un► t July 1, 1986 to June 30, 1987 s YY1M IMALI 6100/0 w1WQ LInViMNW N}KNIVY.•OUM ;lousing Rehabilitation t Categorical Exclusion {, Nnlrt 19Tw wltfOlwwwlI I "NwllW WI TM IMAiT .1tY1 N w Count of San Bernardino (7 )) 383 -3893 16 ptnnwN or Iwwtr Continuation of a Housing Rehabilitatiom Program that offers below market Interest rate loans and deferred loans, to lower income persons or families, and h..ma Improvement grants for minor repair3 to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons. Activities funded include: outreach /public information, horns improvement loans, and emergency repair grants (senior citizens and disabled only.) O 011ta /WOWWM MIT~A %11!11 a/lltsA f1 ttN]M rNwtTWANWt LI,M ►wlNfalW 20 21 and Citywide to oli able households It MlYwwlt ►wrs►wutwNNlt Home Improvement leans 14 each Home Repair Grants 25 each Q ONC1 MtMWWMIK /w/aNP�Uwtll1�M1. f6 colts Cftr AzIIt"Ns ffIQ1NLw t/AR IawsiMwwi�M✓1/ Comm w.MlwwnwfYlt,r •. to.Nll'N Ntltfl ► 5.00 Comm NMIY 8 0 lA`DV%r $ 0 sov� W *Pro A. CMr1tP Xr Atn 1111W)J _ Outreach/ public infer. _ on Home improvement loans 40.06 0 0 Home repair grants 35.00 0 0 16 Tt1111 f 80.0 8 1 ib i ti ^t �..:.'• 16 T"11Cww T►M►iawtl CMlftom 0II000w►111 NN6 G'S"Ir w►1 MmofCwtwtll►wWO $80.0 tYrwN ltaw Mlptt161.✓.r.w Wrfr ftr ✓ /Ml N401A1YllI *Preliminary estimate of funds distribution; funds my be allo•ated £r varying proportions among the individual activities I — 11aM Towr¢ut 2 — NaM Town -Woot 3 — Saww"el atAmwM 4 - ow Alta t.onr 5 - roomallw m" NorthA City of Rancho Ctmrnonga Rehabilitation Target Areas YJ eI/.aTW +TO�aaaM.rJMO WJ+MYtWWrt Jwwrl teNyr.fta/w�aaW+T •+sasw I. WW Of MUC"t —_ City of Rancho Cucamonga a. .M86 —MC -0556 nVY1111 B -86 -HC -0556 • MOKCT W1MatIT J •IngOWaVRKANUIr �� ♦ 10 c+wwlYrlarl (7 mIr�ICr,Nt/4�� FROM t0 July 1, 1986 June 30, 1987 OJWSeWW,snro J YMM•MIt CT L /agall ann.M I.a1mJ�rW rrµ ayM /w/TaTy/ Turner Avenue widening 2(a) Environmontal Review Rea My of J /rtaTt lnT +nIMM•UNtITr /MW +YAM NITM tM11CT • TItJlaaa+t YVWIn Rnncho Cuenmon s 714) 989 -1801 N. sacs W wr w r "ACT This project involves improvements to the east side of Tumor Avenue between 26th Street and the railroad creasing. The improvements include construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights and some retaining walls to widen the street. O OIKI ItInWwIMW Wn ✓alarh7aV flwA as n�wlTaI+JTWw +uwurw+artrnKTw 21 t) JrTK�tJT /O tArIW1�ItiKMTa i S R, FYP }ce�oR °�dtFFPF3d gee`.�ers;mB��"a a. e�i�rstrI�gcte and eocn retaining walls for street widening. O OW Sf.urwsrma.ulwwaayn/a.aeNraa. TI. rsao cowrorf +T JCrIVaTKa a00611JY rJM rannof Gawrwru fe10 LMw+nrarN"aYrW /..NMrNMYM•s •At46tlIIJUINMJ� Ia+rWJMJJ LO.aaOa IIN /w OTM+ MY //w "PLI'w Iayrtt W W W W W Street reconstruct.on • 8 225,0 s 0 0 0 and widening td. Ts1a11 i 225.0 = 0 a 0 Ya e,,.'•• IL TOW COTO TO if PAW WT CO'"'I' ryONw/raa+l Ik" idol r"O' fiw'+ sfCalnr" a Owe; f 225,0 •,I.KrIq WYRIIf. /+n, +awNM� ray of Pop" �f., *Engineering and 10 percent construction c,nttngency onle. uired North♦ City of Rancho Cucamonga Tuner Avenue WkW tg + rMar/.9r W DI /MITVIaT O/MOW:Ma aMaYMw0lrrla/Wtlt " r0 KAV wrM )qll etty Mono aa+wacarwlTtavrw . wwrawaw aim Cucamonga PA"CrONOWAY f WlIralW.gaaM /MYYa1. B- 86- MC4556 a nauw or anucaalurr axp oagwu wr,..l C] aovoxM "Tso C3 awMOr)aT wrao root July 1, 1986 ro June 30, 1987 /. Maw or raow Cl araolln MYYrr• ).aMV1aaMWMaLM.rlralalVl u ninon 2 6 Care orieal Exclusion • twatif Rancho Cutownga ragawrTw naww a. n714) 989-19 City )f Rancho Cucamonga (714) 989 -1961 It au:alrnaMar/aowtr The purpose of this project Is to imprcve selected streets (those with war 512 low Income households) in the Southweat Cucarlenge area. This year Slerr Madre Av.:nue, Avenuda Velar, and Via Carillo between Sierra Madre and Grove Avenues north of Arrow Route will be Involoved. These streets will have cur gutters, sidwalks and street lights installed. In addition, the pavement wlJ be reconstructed where necessary. [] CMTt Nash +rr /arlraYtalwlprpfJa + sruva. .1 21 TaaRfNwMWlaaTgM D./1gCTW 21 li aY1KNalaa a(tC(OWYreYrM)a t1 .,nmsotrucclonua cur a. gutter,is0 awaReent.setre8eiflg lI nand pavamant Ichabilltation. D Olar ara)a'avAaT MYO•aWaawfurrormtA. .a was mwroarM anlwnu /aowwrau rwwaw....�wa. a a/,wr,lnNwra.r.fFr Mrrldbw/+ w r►t4 COJfaLYw4r. Y, Ira. MwaJafJJ CON OTw Lorl..oa efM /It oTwa wYrI1T a� aawatt Street reconstruction S 225.0 S 0 S 0 and widening Is. TeWI S2 0 a 0 S 0 b: IS. TeW Cain TOY ltd snm Galr.wrye/.r1ap.Irnl Slral Grwll iunal �L,n o/LW..waaWt/ t 225.0 ......,....�....�.r...�.r np of pips M ?Ogllrrnl r NorthA Ciq of Rancho Cucamonga Southwest oxwTkxw street kwovwmm i 1 4 1 1 iced i i 1 1 1 1 i 1 t rl i�i a,v...w,alowlxl..wl�aarrr Ai •( Plan ,wo lrr•ein �� 1� ITt :'r N- y Ya wlaa,WMNw•IMUM •M YNaw wvr4rWMT I.l. }W MM[ CIIO Cucemogn MMwi wrruw,Tr MYilarrtrr r110•wY, {:1 Y o as a�ewertYwwr •••,••r.,...N..4..rr . i, B -86-NC -0556 raw x rwno or alriKanun a.KYi •wlriar� w O MYWr.wtr• July 1, 1986 Juna 70, 1987 p arww« a.,ro I YMMr••<C/ •rMr wra•u t.•a•rarrrrT4 MVrlw•r•,N Arrow Route Tm rovem¢nte 2 (c) Environmental Review Pe u V. •wr,Tr wTw aar•rswun NM uawrwM M r W nnw•r City of Reecho Cucamonga p1A) 989 -1861 la ••r•arrwr •r.MTn This Is o project whose purpose is to upgrade public improvements in this predominantly iw and moderato income area of Southwest Cucamonga. Arrow Route batvaaa Grove and Sierra Hndre Avenues will be improved with pavement rehabilitation, the construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks and the inatalletioo of street 1lghce a OiiN •a.,AM «•aF1!«ap,rH,! W wren 1, 21wiN Ta•alpll/•rWrLTMrar,11,t1W It arlw:MaTi•a•tirlmwa•rnl Pavement rehabilitation, construction of cr ncreto curbs, gutters and sidewalks and the installation of street l.ghts. M awaw.e,r «rrrhrwnu.rwrw. ,x caw carrorr,n acimr,u woaaar, nos rr.w bnw.,.w ra, a{M.nw�,a,Y,wrrrawa..�ra•�w� O•a YM4 iNf /ll.•anl•r, /r,.aiVar/1 iOMP orlw NWrn MNnr arR11,Mr •ovacr W aV aJ Y « c t 200.0 t 0 t 0 M Tows $200.0 t 0 t o a ;,akti•y; 4• rr•' . It. T¢YC•ia T•Y►Mtrw tlwrrwlr Orwl,�wrM thin Onrr lraY G«•rCWw�r1•Mi/ t 200.0 i • 1 � Loss. „_ dllOLlttt I,OIUIW,OIII „11tolls 10,,,,,,,, „G i � E 3 - u„unuuuu.uwu,uuwuw„9'v s tl f ieeee. , i!=~� tNorth __. fyk� City of Rancho Cucamonga Armes RYAe kriprovements Al 4 ee "r r a 9 a .Y T t r i dt �r brY.wwrl•r rtJDlNOl,aapa0laww rM of rf rwlO r/IfLLwr r •r i ua «rurbfrn er rralAUra NSUafa+«vfu.wn r, wart as w.Kerr arw,w�rAr,lvrnr «vfabrwnrabsa.r City of Rancho Cucamonga flaltcTMltYaAi . Mtl[.TMM.Mtr1MKf• 8- 86 -1SC -0556 +. gaKe or awtlrJwurr ♦YA bw.rLrrf«f raaw fs O asvr+araas July 1, 1986 Juna 70r 1987 O arrsrn,aarsa I waNM/NReI rW f. Y`rwlirflCT4 YYrMar.rM Pnlr Housing Servi.ae 3a Lxem t f .. ram wTwaarror,alunwwa • rN aw T«raswn r Inland Y.edlacicn (714) 987 -8663 1a ONfRnlarfM.NAN The program will provide counseling and referral services to those lover lneonus members of society vho have special housing needs. Services v111 Include landlord /tenant mediation, default /foreclosure and discrimination counseling. O 0'aa ArrwfWawdawtfufbnffsyrfUrrlJgea rl tfMVl t11MWW1(f11.TIM.Y•MCiln It MTKVaT /a.tCMfr /w«rla The program is expected to assist low income people throughout the City O Otl ManrJIN «bNTYwIJwNUwMSR. If. iarO WYlOrrfwT aL'IFIfMa fflOpaaN YlM I1M1/�{rww.Ill a.YT,IrrwairarrMlir�V.P,a MRAMYwrra rJaa bM4 COST lWwfA� JwbfrVl!!J .arYwa0 oT«a «rNrT N «rn aNSUwT aaVa11 W M W ftJ W Fair-Housing Services f 7.5 f 0 f 0 i N. Twrf f 7.5 t 0 f 0 a :,ly,'„; ¢SC •'^. �.,•'•' If. TN rsvb Ta MliaM,al Srlv.wryDrflM.arrlfNtaGwfr10 fJrvaMCabwrlraN4 f J•g W Wr•.,WW er FeWw••.OYNN MYOMW.t YFWLOaWM„IIMWtMY \FtIW.W nleww wwallr 1. "Avg or rwU , City of Rancho Clmhmnnn a••wl u,.a ro..F, FwW,. B- 86 -MC-06 -0556 rl.,Oear MIIC•MUTI sin e+rFYI/I.Irr/ �.LwuF.s.11s O •,rrwW,Nlla \July 1, 1996 Ts June 30. 1987 • Se b rtewll Senior Shared Housing 3 b r.I,I.I,M.11tWM1•r psempt MVMw1 W I MI„F,T..IY.,e,Mwtt 1.,1111Y„IW MtFI Mpwif lnlnnd Medigtion .t,Y (714) 987 -8663 Y sunrroF O+r.own Senior Shared Housing matches up people uho want to share their home with Senior citizens in need of housing O Ow,s Iwtlir/rINInM /s,sffJ W srfa� „ Lt.tW,.•e,Ww.W,w•IW O /,.,L7W City wide v unsr•rto•ttww.rwm To assist senior citizens with locating affordable housing. O dtl MSwwrfrleNlWSrfgWsnsM. ,l teN CDWaF1Ft Ml.n,t1 a•,r waw.,A~F. •vwrrwrM,Yw� w hn4 ltl{rlUar4.e 1, IM.•WYI YI•MIYwwW•. C/ee O' "m "wpm "wpm e,W. gym eeu.el fY Y v Senior Shared Houning 8 6.0 1 0 Montclair P3.0 County of San 11. Taws t 6 0 g i ♦:.'i1,b' °: ��` ai A. I�.Tw C�e1 Te M /MrMC•,....Fry bWN,ewMJ4l drnlw,{L,MC•Mrrewrq S 6.0 f•rr. /•�. FVpq,I I.,•r,.C.W,r Pat, of MI FYP WmI t....,.,1 YJ DIIYIfY {NTN NMIYa Y1eVMM NWIOIMMT .nw.\co.NUlaTrorva\olw.rlRwR.N MW%C-.SWAA11r I. FYN OI N4CMT City of Rnncho Cucamonga T. Nl4-6—.e. IWWt11 - a NR1OOW ll L IUTr l D RavN�M oR1o41.."TID ' D O.wINw W.o.T1O IIIOY July 1, 1986 TO June 30. 1987 eiumn a Park 5=rv�Acquisition ImN'1„RrN.ef.TW Rvironmental Ravi" re a \Milts IaTN RINpN14 \ITT IaR fJRROM WTIM IFOMel CitY of Rancho Cucacon a f {UINOF RWI 714 989 -1861 la OtI44MIaR OF IROwcT Soutnuest Cucamonga was surveyad in 1985 to determine its eligibility for community improvements utilising CDBC funds. Over 512 of the households were found to be low and moderate Income. The area in a target area for Improvements. Development of a neighborhood park (approximately 5 acres) would support public and private revitalization efforts and provide for the recreation needs of the residents. O Cfrt Mp9C]IIIJaNa6WSma / syTiyralarss v urWTluuawn.w{R.raRONr.�orw 21 Ia ...nu.Tao.Ctarwwtvra Acquisition of a 5 sere park. D GMd e'{msrN/aT.�syYWRR*e11Na.axA If Wa.I eereRlM.RlrlTlla aMY1W.M11.V/Y...Ia.I.r II�MRYMw. Y ha a. iOTI6NYI.R/ Ir. N%PRf)J TeeaR.Y ra.RIWnI I.I M. /.111 rbMl OTN \e NMo" In eirR ""PIT �'�O1 {'T ai11Ra 4l W 10300.0 W 611 41 Land Acquisition S 0 S 0 14, ToNU S 300 0 S 0 S 0 :•IP .il�ii I* "1 c•i• 7S. Tawl Corn TSMh4afmCalwOnlA DawbplrTS+xs GamiWlWwarCeAww.ayal t 300.0 4O rIg of Pp, NveT &W {fired NorthA City of Rancho Cucanxroa Southwest Cucamorge. Park' O 1 .. '. m . I - HUUi1Np AbWol, wec ru v I-IN IC I -IOI6 - 0 S S I'TTC'7t 1— HUO AP/S,IOVAL " few, Octuher 1 1985 1X Sept. 70, 1988 .i4 A ufwU1 n '; mOrlDnll ❑flniti0n ❑Amndmfnt Wfnfwn oF.wlAenrq OO.r,dl lanl FART 1 - HOU3ICOAWSTANCSCEEED3 TABLE I - HOUA NO STOCK CONDITIONS STANDMDLWITS [UOSTMDMD UNIT[ RISSTANDMD UNIT[ SVITAOLC FOR RENAI TFNVR{ OCCUnCD UNITS I TYPE OCCU -190 VACANT OCCUPIID VACANT VACANT �— NNITT UNITS VNfTS UNIT[ ioN1 LIA.,lnalw UNITC TABLE II - MENTAL SUBSIDY NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS rynl IT - InHCU TtAR COAL TABLE 1 - UNITSTOUEASSISTEO ELDERLY eMALLPAMILY LMGOIAMILY TOTAL Q 171 % 4g MTf 3TANnAwL Vfl Low lneomf A t IMrROVlM[[N 3 1 43 .V Olnfr Lauver l�tnm� ETA 0 Ifh 259 tt t % ICl 3 5 n IT To w Dapi.ml _ __(L n 0 _ 0 �'{{ _ 12 Tow 7g IS 7111 IS 1 % rynl IT - InHCU TtAR COAL TABLE 1 - UNITSTOUEASSISTEO • - •wras lUfwla, wwuuRGOME HOI�EHOLDSI TABLE II - LONER INCOME ' TABLE III - OUSEHOLOS_TO RECEIV9,REM CLO[RLY FP, ALLFAMILY F _ p - t LO[RLY TAOGC FAMILY TOTAL LARGE FAMILY TOTAL � HOUSING TYPE POEFC REHCEf M4 0nm llumnU of Unrn tnoE wdr to geer,�ted/ -- _— New — nFHAO -- - _ -- --.� ellulu Ta 73 —73 73 {rt0'rc!NNfwr ITfMFODneVIt'TSha toIeVlnT SfAtl HOWinP 4;MCF`Rf0,70 :f Within in NUOLI(n. -• ^ - -_ PART 111 - GEHERALLOCATIONS (aL•Tehcd) f AlffeA lrVO nfmWrm nu-0 t RI Aeft"IL1p ATION NEW [ONV[Af101110 _— 4g MTf 3TANnAwL CONSTRUCTIo1 ftANOMOUNIrs y IMrROVlM[[N L y 1{ Dwn11 11 R_mtr • - •wras lUfwla, wwuuRGOME HOI�EHOLDSI TABLE II - LONER INCOME ' TABLE III - OUSEHOLOS_TO RECEIV9,REM CLO[RLY FP, ALLFAMILY F _ p - t LO[RLY TAOGC FAMILY TOTAL LARGE FAMILY TOTAL � HOUSING TYPE POEFC REHCEf M4 0nm llumnU of Unrn tnoE wdr to geer,�ted/ -- _— New — nFHAO -- - _ -- --.� ellulu Ta 73 —73 73 {rt0'rc!NNfwr ITfMFODneVIt'TSha toIeVlnT SfAtl HOWinP 4;MCF`Rf0,70 :f Within in NUOLI(n. -• ^ - -_ PART 111 - GEHERALLOCATIONS (aL•Tehcd) f AlffeA lrVO nfmWrm nu-0 t RI T-.I.L,,,o,- O J � a � V � W 2 • u F C W m O e W N H Q = 4 N a <� t 1 z a u a u u 1 o_ mHJ J y CC P O 7 6 _ O CC e y Q� Z q y0. J_ •� o n n o o 0 •� '� N i• � 1 $ J y � p �. "• O N O O C •'• y T-.I.L,,,o,- O J � a � V � W 2 • u F C W m O e W N H Q = 4 N a <� t 1 z i a u a u u o_ y y O • O O CC y M Q� Z q y0. J_ •� o n n o o 0 •� '� N i• $ J y � p �. "• O N O O C •'• y N O 6 ♦ •' p Y 9 p• � O O G v v 9 w�yi< p a a p L L 7 s G S u C C K% ^ L rr m •+• K p m^ O O . O a C u0 � G O y V N O C C z o• .. N > c D m a s x C> a u u i a a u u y y O • O O CC y M r. q y0. y T f VU • q 0 Y• C •'• i O 6 ♦ •' p Y 9 p• � M m^ v v N t G C u u o ^ = 4 p m O K p m^ i p a C u0 fa O y V N O C C o• .. N > c D m a s C> a u u m m 5 b G `• Y m q C M N V r+ H V a U N y u i C Y m w � ^ O •Ir •p • S � o 0 e S r a b Z e1 N Ilo _1 Q r- s C\I I i w � � 1 NCI'X 111co C3 c O C) oc ,p C O E V C\I I i w � � 1 NCI'X 111co C3 *NOTE (Footnote to Table II, line 19, and Table III, line 21.) 1 The goal shows only 19 units for the elderly consistent with the proportion of needs and available funds. This goal is too small to alloy for a feasible senior citizen project. A goal large enough to accommodate a ' :•asible development, in order to maintain proportionality by family type, would necessitate total goals which are extremely unrealistic both in relation to need and to available resources. Therefore, if an ass. .rly housing development is proposed, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will consider amending its NAP to accommodate the project and will at ..et time request a waiver of proportionality requirements based on reacmnable level of effort and past performance. 11 i iNARRATIVE DISCUSSION OF HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA i1985 -88 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN iI. Definition of Substandard Units are considered to be substandard if they do not meet the requirements of the Uniform Housing Code. These requirements generally exceed the Section 8 Existing housing quality standards. II. Definition of Units Suitable for Rehabilitation Housing units are considered suitable for rehabilitation if they art structurally sound and the cost of rehabilitation will not exceed the lover of the follovin,; moasures: -30% of replacement cost of the unit /structure -80% of the market value after rehabilitation III. Estimates of the Number of Lover Income Households Expected to Reside In Rancho Cucamonga The estimates for the number of additional lover income households expected to reside (ETR) in Rancho Cucamonga by 1988 are derived from the Regional Housing Allocation Model (RRAM) prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments. Since the RHAH covers the five year period frog 1983 -1988, 60% of their estimate was used for this three year HAP. The percent allocated to each family type is based on a distribution prepared by HUD, DL0 for the region which includes Rancho Cucamonga. IV. Assessment oI the Impact of Condomiol m Conversions Althougl. testa vas some conversion of rental housing to condominiums prior to 1983, there has been no interest in conversion in recent years. Rather, there has been a revival of construction of apartments. Rancho Cucamonga's condominium ordinance limits conversions to no more than nne -half the number of rental units added to the housing stock within the preceding year. No disptacement is expected as a result of conversions during the 1985 to 1988 HAP period. V. Minority Household Needs Estimates of minority housing needs were updated using proportions from the 1980 Census applied to 1985 household estimates for the City from the State Department of Finance. A. Black 1. Lover Income households in substandard housing: 12 owners; 2 renters 401.f 2. Lower income households requiring rental subsidies: 1 elderly; 12 small family; 3 large family 3. Lower income households to be displaced: none B. Spanish Origin 1. Lower income households in substandard housing: 74 owners; 14 renters 2. Lower income households requiring rental assistance: 15 elderly; 116 small family; 31 large family 3. Lower income households to be displaced: acne C. Native American 1. Lower income households in substandard housing: 4 owners; 1 renter 2. Lower income households requiring rental subsidieo: 1 elderly; 12 small family; 3 large family 3. Lower income households to be displaped: none 0. Asian or Pacific Islander 1. Lower income households in substandard housing: 10 owners; 2 renters 2. Lower income households requiring rental subsidies: 1 elderly; 8 emall family; 2 large family 3. Lower income tousehclds to be displaced: none 2 VI. Handicapped Housing Needs Estimates of handicapped housing needs were updated based on the proportions of the population found to be handicapped in a 1978 survey conducted by the State Department of Rehabilitation. These proportions were applied to the 1985 household estimates prepared by the State Department of Finance. Using this metbodology, a total of 1,920 persons in Rancho Cucamonga are estimated to have disabilities which affect tbeir housing needs (such as blindness, deafness, ausculoekeletai conditions, amputations, deformities, paralysis, muscular dystrophy, etc.). Moat of the disabled are not in lover income households. In addition. about 7f of the disabled are also elderly. Total Low Income Renters Single Individuals 787 39 In Sue 11 Families 1,018 51 In Large Families 115 6 1,920 126 VII. Single Parent Household Needs Estimates of the number of single parent families needing aseivtance were updated by applying percentages derived from the 1980 Census data to the 1985 Department of Finance estimates of the number of households in Rancho Cucamonga. Total Singlr Parent Households 1,656 Female- Headed 1,292 Lower Income SinCle Parent Households 506 Penale- Headed 434 ,stimated to Need Rental Assistance 312 Pena le- Headed 280 VIII. Other Special Housing Needs None. 3 NARRATIVE FOR TMOt -YZAR AND ORE -SAAR GnALS 1985 -1988 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PUM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. Displacement No substandard units are expected to be desellshed or lover income households relocated a: a result of direct Federal, State, or local actions. 11. Actions the City N111 Take to Implement Its One and Three Year Coals: A. Mortgage Revenue Bonds (owner) The Redevelopment Agency sells mortgage revenue bonds to provide balm market mortgage financing for Queer, occupants. Most users will be moderate income, none are expected to be low income. Issues funding so estimated 1,500 mortgages have been sold in the past three yaars. The goal will be realized, therefore, subject only to market conditions and the developers' ability to develop nod sell the homes. B. MUM- Family Revenue Bonds (renter) By cooperation agreement with the County of San Bernardino, reutal projeeta in Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted to lm income households at rents lam than 30 percent of income, my be financed with County Multi- family Mortgage Revenue Bonds. Some 385 additional units have been proposed. Developer interest is currently vary strong. However, market conditions and developer performance will dictate blether the units committed are completed. C. CDBG Rehabilitation Loans Through a contract with the County of San Bernardino, the City offers low interest rehabilitation loans to lower lncome households oltywlde. Approximately 8.5 units per year or 25 units will be brought up to standard through this program. Rental Rehab loans are given only to structures to be occupied solely by lower income rooters. Rents after rehab may cot exceed 30% of tenant income. Five Lrdts will be brought up to standard through this program. D. Senior Paergeacy Repair Grants Through a contract with San Bernardino County, the City offers emergency repair services to lower income, senior hozemners in the City. Approximately 25 units per year, or 75 units in total will be assisted through Vila program. 401.8 E. Section 8 Existing (or successor program) The City has entered k cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino to administer the Section 8 Existing program. The goals reflect the reduced funding for this program and the fact that rents in the City are often higher than Pair Market gents. However, there Is a good potential of using Section 8 Existing in the density bonus affordable housing to be produced as a part of the large planned developments under construction in the City. P. Article ECCIV Referendum Authority The voters of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a referendum allowing public ownership or financing of low rent housing pursuant to Article IZRIV of the State Constitution. This enables use of public housing and various ealtl —family financing programs. There are currently eleven units of scattered site public housing in the City. The City has entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino for use of the Public Housing Program. No funding is anticipated for this progrm in the first Housing Assistance Plan year. However, agreement• are In place should funding become available. C. Affordable Housing Incentives State law requires cities to offer incenti%e• (including public Improvements or density bonuses) to any project with a least 252 of the unite affordable to low and moderare income households. Several of the Planned Communities In Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments for the development of affordable housing in the text of the approved or proposed Community Plan. The developer commits to develop a percentage of unite at prices or rents affordable to lower income households, in exchange for City incentives. H. Redevelopment 202 of Tax Increment funds from the City's redevelopment projects will be used to assist low income housing development as necessary and as funds become available. METHODOLOGICAL NOTES 1985 -1988 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA Part I: HOUSING ASSISTANCE FEEDS Table I - Housint Stock Conditions This table addresses the condition of the existing housing stock. The information was updated to 1985 using State Department of Pimance estimates for January 1, 1985. The proportion owner- occupied, renter - occupied unite and vacant units were taken from the 1980 Census and applied to the 1985 data. Likewise, the proportion of substandard units is based on a HUD formula developed for the last HAP which considers the proportion of units which are more than 40 years old, the proportioa of overcrowded units, the proportion of units lacking complete plumbing, and the proportion of units lacking complete kitchen facilities. This formula was applied to the 1985 unit estimates. Table II - Rental Needs of Lower Income 0o- neholds This table includes both existing needs and the needs expected to result from love: income households moving to Rancho Cucamonga. Jerry Nakano, an economirt in the Lis Angeles HUD office, provided the estimates for existing needs show on lines 8, 9 and 10. Future needs, or those lower income households Expected to Reside (ETR) in Rancho Cucamonga, are shown +n line 11. According to BUD regulations (Appendix A, HAP Guidelines), the City must use the growth figures contained in the Regional Housing Allocation Mode_ (RHAM) developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAO). Since the SHAN is a five -year estimate (1983- 1988), we took 605 of the RHAM growth estimate for lover income households for the total households and distributed than into small family, large family and elderly based on the proportions shown on line 9. No residential units are expected to be demolished an a result of Federal, State, or local projects within Rancho Cucamonga over the next 3 years. Therefore, line 12 ohms zeroes. Part II: THREE -YEAR COAL Table I: Units To Be Assisted Column L - Rehabilitation of substandard units. This goal was based an the pest performance of the rehabilitation loan program. It does not include emergency repair grants. A 5 unit goal for rehabilitation of rental units Is included in recognition /hepe that the new rental rehab program operated by San Bernardino County will be available to Rancho Cucamonga also. This is a conservative goal which we should be able io meet. Since all participants oust be lover income, the figures for lines 15 and 16 are the came as those for lines 17 and 18. Col® M - Bea Construction. The gosts in this "June reflect the revenue -bond funded projects vbicb have base approved and for vbicb financing is available. If the tea law does not change, there are likely to be many more of these units. Bovner, is light of the aocercainty oa We point, a conservative estimate is dvisable. Only 2OZ of the rental "its vill serve lover in..,-. haustAolde (line 18); the rest wilt be moderate lecome. Colsr ! - Co"ersio^. No structures not currently in residential use are e:prcted co be converted to residential we. Coleco O - Bose Is7roeesents. This column eontsias the goals for the emergency repair prograa. The target is based on contLnaatioa of current levels of activity. Slace 211 participants meat be lover intone the figure for lines 15 17 are the sane. Table II - Later Income goasebelds To Receive Bencal Subsidies This table reflects the 35 Section S Wstiea bouseholds currently in the Insanity, the 16 "its of scattered site public boasinS, and the 100 units ehich will be assisted by the rental revenue bond program. Tbi. is again e roaservative gwl be'-- e it is "likely, that these prograas will receive additional funding over the neat three years. Table III - Coals for BCD Res ccs Line 21 identifies the proportion of the goals in Table II vhlch are "peered to be funded by Federal (BDD) faads. dSaiD, it reflects :he "istiaa prograu and wits in the City. Line 22 ideatifi�s the aesiaent nanber of each type of unit ubleb will be accepted by the City. Larger projects or a total in true• of this L Sore require fity and BCD approval. 1977 VI. Citizen Participation r r MAR 25 1955 tCITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY FOR THE CO :4UNITY CEYELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Recent Changes in the regulations governing the expenditure of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds require that the City establish a policy governing the provision of relocation assistance to any family, individual, business, nonprofit organization or farm that res-'t: from implementation of its CD-OG programs It is the policy of the City to avoid displacement of all carrying out its i dCOGS programssse NO displacement s is expected to dresu t in the activities proposed for the 1986 -87 fiscal year. Ho +ever, In the event that operation of any of the COBG funded programs results in the voluntary or involuntary displacement 07 any family. Ind,vidual, business, nonprofit 0-ganization, or farm (whether Owner or renter) the City will provide relocation assistance in accordance with the Assistance and Red alPropertys Acquisitions Act t and Section 7260 Uniform et.sec. o/t ihe �• State of California Government Code (Ti•le 25, Chapter 6) and the gusdel Ines meetedits morel con Commission esponsibilitiesd througght the use m of itshestaff will consultants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors, social agencies, and elric organizations 'I It is the City's objective that all displacees be relocated with a minimum of L har ^•hip to accoraaodations which are docent, safe, sanitary, and suitable to their Individual needs; located in areas not less desirable than their current location in regard t^ public utilities and public and commercial facilities, and reasonably accessible to their CuttOmers or places of VVIOyment; and priced within their financial means The City anticipates no relocations, and will hanae those which result froo Implementation of CDBG activities in an indi•.Idua case- bycese manner Services provided to eligible displacees Shall ,nclude but not be limited tot o Providing Information on project activities, rights, beuefitS, and options open to them. 0 Maintaining liaison between dlSPlacees and agen -'es or firms with resoures to ass'st them (e.g.. Chamber of Cmunerce, Small Business Administration., Office of Local Econalic Development, lending institutions. realtors, etc ) 0 Locating, inspecting, evaluating, or stimulating the production . of accOnnodatlons to meet the needs of all diSplacees. a W. ors o Assisting displacaes in cbtaining financing. o Assisting displacees to securing priority consideration for Section S. public housing, or other housing assistance programs. o Making referrals to appropriate social, comity, and welfare agencies. o Assisting eligible displacees to prepare claims for all relocation assistance payments to which they are entitled. o Keeping records, maintaining files, and coordinating all relocation activities. o Providing all frilies, individuals, businesses, institutions, and farms which are displac•i by CCSG- funded programs, with written entice of this policy, the types of service available to them, and the amount of relocation assistance benefits for which they may be eligible. (PayWts will be those established by State and Federal guidelines.) City staff and cansUltamts will be available to answer questions and provide inforaatian, and by their early involvement to see that relocai ton proceeds With a miniemo of hardship. Vil. Certifications ( , CE11 TIPICATIMS The grantee certifies Hutt (a) It possesses Irdal authority to make a grant submsmon and to execute a community development and housing program; (b) its governing body has duty adopted or passed as an official act a resolution. motion or similar action authorizing the person Identified as the official representative of the grantee to submit the find statement -11 aU understandings and assurances contained lhereln, and directing and alltlwtWng the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to act In connection with the submission of the find statement and to provide suelt additional Information as may be required; (c) Prior to submission of Its final statement to HUD. the grantee taut (1) met rovided citizen with: requirements of S 670.701(a)(2) and has (A) for activities that l that will benefits persotn Ofplow "4 moderate inconc; and (B) setiviti• for assisted with CDB61 fur& and to assist Persons actually displaced as a result of eueh activities; (2) projectedluse or funds eIn accordance mwithyS570.301(s)(3) objectives d made the find statement available to the public; (d) The grant will be conducted and administered In compliance with: (1) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 19G6 (Pub. L. 88- 252142 U.S.C. 2000d at seq.); and (2) Title VBI of the Civn Rights Act of 1968 (Pub. 1.. 90 -286; 62 U.S.C. 2601 1t mh (e) It will of I Irma' -vely furtter fair housing; J February 1984 • If) It has developed Its final statement of projected use ct funds so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which Denaf t low and moderate income families or aid in the preventiz or e'im(rslat of slurps or blight; (thee final statement of projected yze of fuAs may also include activities which the grantee certifies era des!gneA to meet other community development needs having a part!.ular urnhcy bcvtute existing conditions pan a serious and Immediata !.`rest to the health or welfare of the community. and other firincial rerc-arces are not wettable); oxoep: that the aggregate use of CDBC funds received uAer uctioo 106 of the Act and, If applicable, under section 106 of the Act, during 19__ BS-ab__(o perm specified D� grantee consisting of 1, Z, or i program� -years , s principally benefit sons of low and moderate Income In a manner that croures that not era than H percent of such funds are used for activities that benefit such persaa during such perlodt (g) It has developed a community davehtpment plan, for the period specified in paragraph (f) abara, that !dentlfies aimmunity development and housing needs and specifies both short and long -terrr community development objectives that have been developed In accordance with the primary objective and requirements of the Acll (h) it is following a current housing assistance plan which has been approved by IIUD pursuant to 4 570.006; (it It wit not attempt to recover any capital cats of public Improvements assisted In whale or In part with funds provided under section 106 of the Act .v with amounts resultartC from a guarantee under section too of the Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low m,o moderate Income, Including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtainlrri access to such public Improvements,.tnlesse (1) f-mds received under section 106 of the Act are toed to pay the proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital eo:ts of such public Improvements that are financed from revenue sources other than under Title I the Act( or (2) for purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and oecup!rd by persons of low and moderate income who arc not persons of low income, the grantee s certifies ection 1C6of the Act to compt�rl sufficient it .te requirementsof subparagraph received andr (j) It will comply with the other provisions of the Act and with other applicable laws. - 2 - a4",i XC-,cr RESOLUTION ND. RESOL�lTIOR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMOMIA. CALIFORNIA. AUiHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF REFUNDING ROKDS PURSUANT TO THE 'REFUNDING ACT OF 1984 FOR 1915 IWPOYERENT ACT BONDS* WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO COCNO.W, CALIFORNIA, has heretofore undertake proceedings pursuant to Ike •Refunding Act of 1984 for 1915 Improvement Act Bonds% betag Division 11.S of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed reassessments upon lends within a special assessment district , said special district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 92 -IR ( REFUNDiNG) (hereinafter referred to as the 'Refunding District•); and, WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for the issuance of bonds pursuant to the 'Refunding Act of 1904 for 1915 Improvement Act Bonds% being Division 11.5 of said Cale, aid it is necessary to establish tens and provisions of such issuance. WHEREAS, there has now been preserted for consideration by this legislative body an preliminary Official Statement ccataining information including but not limited to the Refunding District and the type of bonds, including terms and conditions therenf. NOW. THEREFORE, iT IS MEREST RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. That the ova recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Issuance of Refundingq �Bands. ReJuadin9 Bonds in the aggregate principal amour u , , �!S SN11 be issued as hereinafter provided upon the security of unpaid reassessments levied In accordance with the refunding law and under and pursuant to the proceedings thereunder duly had and taken. The Wunding Bonds F.erein provided to be issued shall be known as •City of Rancho Cucamonga Assessment District Me. 82 -IR Refunding Bonds% (the 'Refunding Bond or Refunding Bonds•) and shall be dated March 21. 1986. The Refunding Bonds shah be issued only in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, except that one Refunding Bond shall include the mount by which the total issue exceeds the maximum integral multiple of $5,000 contained therein. The Refunding Lands shall be issued in serial form with annual maturities on September 2nd of every year succeeding 12 mm.ths after their date, until Spetenter 2, 1998. Refunding Bonds shall mature In the amounts and on the dates and at the rates of interest to be set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract to be submitted to and subject to the approval of this legislative body. SECTION 3. Form of R*fundtdg Bands. Tne Refunding Bonds thatl be issued pursuant to o e provisions e Refunding Act of 1984 for 1915 Improvement Act Bonds` (the 'Refunding Law'), being Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and shall be substantially in the format of bonds a3 authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the •Improvement Bond Act of 19150, being Division 10 of said Code, except as such format may vary from the terms and conditlans set forth in this Resolution. SECTION g. Interest. Each Refunding Bad shall bn of a single maturity and shalt UP- n erest at a rate not to exceed 12% per annum from the interest payment date next preceding the data on rhicb it is authenticated and registered, unless said Refunding Bond is authenticated and registered as of an interest payment date, in which case at shall bear interest from said interest payment date, Or unless said ; efunding Bond is authenti- cated and registered prior to the first Interest payment date, in which cue it shall bear interest (too Its date, until popent of its principal sum has been discharged. interest shall be payable commencing on March 2, 1987, aed seat- annually thereafter on Septufter 2 and March 2 of each year to maturity. SECTION S. Place of Payment. The pe%clpal and interest on the Refunding Bonds than lbe ayZle in lawful money of the united States of America at the corporate trust office of the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, San Frmisco, California (the "Registrar, Paying Agent and Transfer Agent'). Principal and interatt on raid Refunding Bonds shall be paid by check or draft to the registered owner thereof at his address as it appears on the backs of registration, or at such address as may have been filed with the Reglstrar for that purpose, as. of the 15th day imcedlately Dreading said interest payment date. SECTION 6. Redempt�ion. This Refunding Bond, or a portion thereof if Issued in a aenom slTon greater thar. 55,000, shall be subject to redemption and payment In advance of maturity in increments of SS,000 as provided in Section 8768 of the Straits and Highways Code, on the Itnd day of March or September in any year, by giving the notice provided in sold law to the registered owner thereof at his address as It a9pmars on the books of registration and by paying principal of and accrued interest on such redeemed amount, together with a premium equal to five percent (5%) of the redeemed principal amount. If less than the entire Refunding Bond 1s radeemad, the unredeenel portion shall be reissued to the registered owner thereof. SECTION 7. Transfer of Registered I fuun�nd__i__n__qq Bo�ndss, . My fully registered Refunding Bond nce may, n accraai with U�ers be transferred upon the books of registration required to be kept pursuant to the frovisians of Section 8 by the owner in whose name it is registered, or by his duly authariza4 attorney or legal - opresents'Ive, upon surrender of such fully registered Refunding Oond For roglstratyan of such transfer, accompanied by delivery of a written instrument or transfer in a fam approved by the Transfer Agent and Treasurer and by the owner of said Refunding Bonds, duly executed. The Transfer Agent shall require the payseat by the bonHolder requesting such transfer of any tax or other governmental charge required to be ppaid with respect to such transfer end such charges as provided or In the system of registration for registered debt obligaticns. NO transfer of fully registered Refunding Bonds shall be required to be made during the fifteen (15) days next preceding each tntcrast payment date. SECTION B. Exchange of Registered Refunding Bonds. Fully registered Refunding Bonds may a an a ar tne OTTIce of thq designated Transfer Ag"t/ Registrar, for a like aggregate principal amount of Refunding Bonds of the sass series interest rate and maturity, subject to the terns and conditions provided in the syttn of registration for registered debt obligations, including the pcyment of co*tain charges, If any, upon surrender and cancellation of this Rofunding Bond. 0pon such transfer and exchange, a now registered Refunding Bond or Bonds of say authorized denomination e o1 tall amount *111 sbef issued to the transform sformm in exchange SECTION 9. Rooks of Re istration. There shall be kept by the Ragistrar sufficient Dots or rog s ration and transfer of the Refunding Bonds and* upon ableeregulations asset i yopretcrtbe, regisstter ooritransfer soh causeato be registered or transferred, on said register, Refunding Bonds as hereinbefore provided. SECTION 10. Execution of Bonds. The Refunding Bands shall be executed in facsimile yy—th-e-lTayor-and Me Treasurer and attested by the City Clark, and the corporate seal shall be imprinted in facsimile on the Refunding Bonds. The Refunding Bonds shall then be delivered to the Transfer Agent WA Registrar, for authentication and registration. la case An officer oho shall have signed or attasted to any of the Refunding Bonds by facsimile or otherwise shall cease to be such officer before the authentication, delivery and issuance of the Refunding Bonds, such Refunding Bonds nevertheless may be authenticated, delivered and issued, and upon such authentication, delivery and issue, shell be as 4lnding as though those who signed and attested the same had remained In office. SECTION 11. Aut enttcation, only such of the Refunding Bonds as shall beV thereon a car ca c of authentication substantially in the form below, manually executed by the Transfer Agent and Registrar, shalt be Mid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefit. of this Rasolb- tion and such certificate of the Transfer Agent and Registrar shall be conc {usivr evidence that the Refunding Bonds so authenticated have been duly exxuted, authenticated and delivered hereunder, and are entitled to the benefits of this Resolstion. 0 FORA OF CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION AND REGISTRATION (� This bond has been authenticated and registered on BARK OF AriERICA NATIONAL TRUST ANO SAVINGS ASSOCIATION as Paying Agent, Registrar and Transfer Agent By: _ SECTION 12. Neaotiebilit, Reoistration mad Transf_er� 90undi�_6onds. The raps er UT la u ng Baca eq reg ssierMdnTy upon sk -nooks of 0 0 registration upon surrender thereof to the Transfer Agent and Registrar, together with an assignment duly executed by the owner or his attorney ar legal representative, in satisfactory fors. Upon any such registra- tion of transfer, a no" Refu,.ding Bond or Bonds shall be authenticated and delivered ir, exch,rrge for such Refunding Bond, in the name of the transferee, of any denomination or denominations authorized by this Resolution, and in an aggregate principal mount aq'aol to the principal mount of such Refunding Bond or principal amount of such Refunding Bond or Weds so surrendered. In all cases to wisich Refunding Bonds shall be exchanged or transferred, the Transfer Agent and Registrar shall authen- ticate at the earliest Practical time, Refunding Bonds In accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. All Refunding Bonds surrendered in such exchange or registration transfer shall forthwith be cancelled. The legislative body may make a charge for every such exchange or regis- tration of transfer of Refunding Bonds sufficient to reimburse it for any tax or other govtrmmisital charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or registration of transfar. The Transfer Agent and Registrar shall not be required to make such exchange or registration of transfer of Refunding Bonds during the fifteen (15) days lmwedlrtely preceding any March 2nd or September 2nd. SECTION 13. Ok"shlp of Rsfuiding Bards. The person in whose name any Refunding n a Be reg s eired—afRil be descd and regarded as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes, and payment of or on account of the prixlpal and redemption premium, if any, of any such Refunding Bond, and the interest on any such Refueling Bond, shalt be made only to or upon the order of the registered owner thereof or his legal representa- tive. All such paeyymmeennts shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the litbility upon such Refunding Bond, including the redemp- tion premium, if any, and Interest thereon, to the extant of the sum or suits to paid. SECTION 11. Mutilated Destroyed. Stolen or !ost Refu Min Bonds. In case any un ng n sacure y s a1��rams sac or Be destroyed, staler, or lost, the legislative body shall cause to he executed and authentitated a new Refunding Bond of like date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon thu cancellation of such mutilated Refunding Bond or in lieu rf rod in substitution for such Refunding Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the owner's paying the reasonable expenses and charges in connection therewith, and, in the case of a r 0 ►J Aefundlaq Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, his filmy with the legislative body of evidence satisfactory to it and to the Auditor thereof that such Refunding Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of his owner }hip there• of, and furnishing the 1e915i8tive body with indemnity satisfactory to it. SECTION 15. Cancellation of RefueI Bonds. All Refunding Bonds paid or redeemed, either at redemption of such efundiny Bonddss,AM Shall ll pe delivered tothe transfer my Bonds registrar undersany oaf the at provis�siof this Resolutioneshaalll be destroyed by the Tradsfer Ag�mt and R istrar, which shall execute a C to duplicate descriDIng the Refunding Bonds so destroyed, asd shall retain said executed certificate in its Permanent files for the issue. SECTION 16. Reserve Fund, pursuant to part Id of Division 10 of the California reeTs an Ighways Coda, as amended, there shall be created a special rreserve a fund for the Refunding Bonds to be designated by --%a name of the Refunding District Ud specified as the spacial •Reserve F.rt�. The Reserve Fowl shalt be funded as follows: The initial designated amount And shall be to deposited( In the Reserve Fund o� ofocontributionsn by " City. At the ties cf the bond closing, an initial amount of 3195,000.00 shall be deposited into the Reserve Fund from City contributions. The renslning portion of the Dpinikal designated amount of the Reserve Fund shall No. 82.11 whicrh become delinqusenttifnnotl paid anoorAbefore April 10 1986. Periodically, at such times as may be determined by the leglslat ;ve body, monies representing Interest on funds on deposit In the Reserve Fund %ball be transferred to the Reserve Fund, but only to the extent permitted herein. tbnies in the Reserve Fund shall be applied as follows: A. Amwnts in said Reserve Fund shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund for the I .nds if, as a result of delinquencies in the payment of raassessaents, there we insufficient monies in said Redemption Fund to pay principal of and interest on the bonds. Amounts so transferred Shall be repild to the Reserve Fund from proceeds from the redemption or foreclosure of property with respect to which an reassessment is unpaid and from payments of the delinquent reassessments; B. The amount in the Reserve Fund may accrue to ten percent (10%) of the principal amount of the Refunding Bonds; however, said amount shall at no time eacead the •reserve requirement• which for purposes of this Resolution means maxima Adnusl Debt Service or such lesser amount as shall equal 150% of annual debt service for the Pond year for which the ccegrutotion of the reserve requirement is made. For purposes of this Resolution the taro •Annual Debt Service• means the scheduled asouit of interest and aro,Ki:atlon of principal payable on the Refunding Bonds in the bond year for which the computaticn is made. For purposes of this fesolution, the term •bond Year• means the 12 month period beginning September 2 of each year and ending on the 1st day of said nonth in the following year. 'j, Annually on the first day of each Bond Year or on the preceding do. in the event that such h first day is not a badness dzy, the Treasurer shall compute A.-lual Debt Service on the Refunding Bonds during the forthcoming Bond Ye. In the event that, based upon such computa- tion, the Treasurer determines that the amount then on deposit In the Reserve Fund exceeds the reserve requirement, the Treasurer shill withdran the excess aecvnts from the Reserve Fund and shall deposit such amount In the Redemption Fund to be applied to the payment of debt service on the Refunding Bonds an the next interest payment date. C- Whenever conies In the Reserve Fund are sufficient to retire all of the Rafaftding Bonds outstanding, plus accrued interest thereon, such money shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund for the Refunding Bonds and collation of the remaining unpaid reassessments shall cease. D. The amount of the annual Reserve Fund disbursement undertaken pursuant to subsection 8. herainabove shall be credited toward installments of unpaid reassessments each year during which any part of the Refunding Bonds regain outstanding. The Auditor's Record, prepared pursuant to Section 8682 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall reflect credits against each of the uhrald reassa•unents to the manner provided in Section 10027.1 of said Code, In mounts equal to each parcel's proportionate share of the annual reserve fund disbursement. Subject to the limitations contained in subsection 8 beretnabove, no portion of the annual Reserve Fund disbursement shall be transferred 40 In any year in excess of the anpunt which would cause the Reserve Fund to fall below :he original amount of the Reserve Fund, minus adjust- ments to reflect tice discharge of reassessments prior to maturity made to that point. E. In the event that any annual Reserve Fund disbursement was not fully made In any year becausa to ha.nh done so would have caused the Reserve Fund to fall below the mir•'xs amount for that year, the Treasurer may thereafter transfer end credit any amounts to excess of the mtninm ; amount toward the reastessamnt installments duo in subsequent years. in the event assessments are paid to ca'h in advance of their final maturity date, the Treasurer is authorized to reduce the minimum amount of the Reserve Fund and increase the annual Reserve Fund disbursements in the proportion to which the reassessments psld In cash bears to the total original unpaid reassessments. SECTION 17. Refundln Tr st Fund. The proceeds from the sale of the Refunding Bonds, t, a cr epos .-required amounts in the Reserse Fund and the Redemption Fund, and the payment of the costs of issuance of the Refunding Bonds, and all City contributions not otherwise dedicated shall be placed in the fund hereby created, pursuant to Sections 4613 and 9616 of the California Streets and Highways Code, as amended, which shall be called the •Refund- Ing Trust Fund% and the morales in said Fund shall be used only for the purpose of refunding the bonds to be refunded, and the funds shall be 41 applied only as permitted by the Refunding Law. SECTION 16. Investment of Refunding Trust Fund Monies. Immediately upon deposit of u procee s Tro" tile salt or the C9Funding fonds and the applicable City contributions into the Refunding Trust Fund, an amount thereof necessary to pay the principal of a9d interest and redemption preatumi on the refunded bonds on July 2. 1986, shall be invested by the Treasurer to •Federal securites• as defined by Section 9600(c) of Via California Streets and Highways Cede, as amended. Such tnvestunat shall nature so as to ensure that tuck monies, and any interest earned tlwreon, are available for the purpose of redeenIng the refunded bonds on July 2, 1936. Monies in the Refunding Trust Fund any not be invested so that the interest earned tharemi exceeds the interest payable an the Refunding Bonds. SECTION 19. Redem otlon of Refundin BoBonds. The Treasurer shill undarUke Dreceld- ngs parr:ucn to v s on 111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California to cause the advance retirerent of the refunded bonds on July 2, 1966. Principal of and interest and redemption premiums on the refunded bonds shall be payable from the Refunding Trust Fund. Any surplus to the Refuutding Trust Fund after completion of the advance retirement of the refunded Bonds not necessary to pay the designated cost of issuance of Refunding Bones shall Ira immadiatety transferred to the Redemption Fund. SECTION 20. Costs of issysnce. The cost+ of issuing the Refunding Bonds shall be . .a nom proceeds of sale of tho Refunding Bonds. SECTION 21. Redemption Fund. Principal of and Interest on sold Refunding Bonds s.a� "il to Palo out of the Redemption Fund created pursuant to Section 8671 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Accrued interest paid by the purchasar of the Refunding Bonds, if any, shall be deposited in the Redmptim Fund. SECTION 22. Covenant to Foreclose. The legisla'lktve body hereby covenants that upon a au t o any reasstssnant paywit due, it will cause Superior Court foreclosure oroceedings to be brought within one hundred fifty t150) days of such default and thereafter diligently prosecute to completion such proceedings. Such foreclosure proceedings may be deferred if funds are advanced to the special Reserve Fund to keep sold Fund continually at the level set forth in the Section entitled •Reserve Fund' set forth hereinabove. SECTION 23, order to Print and Authenticate Refundln Band!. The Treasurer is hereby na rue ne go cause Kefunding Bonds, as set forth above, to be printed, and to proceed to cause said Refunding Bonds to be authenti- cated and delivered to an authorized representative of the purchaser upon payment of the purchase price as set forth in the accepted proposal for the sale of Refunding Bonds. SECTION 24. Non-Arbttr&Qe Covenant. The City hM say covenants with the owners of e a un n9 o. ss at it will make, no ute of the proceeds cf. the Refunding Bolls at any tiet during the term thereof which, if such use had bean reasonably expected on the date said Refunding Bonds wire 7ssuad, would have rausnd said Refunding Bonds to %a arbitrage bonds within the staining of the Internal Revenue Code of 1951, as wended, or any Internal Revenue Code which is enacted in 11eu of the Internal Revenue Cod* of 1954, ub the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. SECTION 25. Arbttra a Certificate, on tloe basis of the frts, esti.l"ates and circus~ S funds or n ex a cote and in axtatMe on the date of issue of the Refunding Bonds, a determintd by the Treasurer, said Treasurer is oirtthhe issue will be used iIn that it is not r xp cted that the Proceeds to a arbitrage bonds, Swsh certification shall be delivered to the Purchaser together with the Refwwiinn Bonds. SECTION 26. Investm.•nt rf lbnlat in Refundin Bond Funds. Except as otherwise pro- viacd ,Ten "nn, a ion es a ,y a reasurer in ah; of the funds or accounts established pursuant to these proceedings and all monies held by used to the C'.ty In any fund or account which is reasonably expected to be Refundlnjelon s or shallinotl a invested so use tofadversely affect the Owds.lan from Federal income taxation of interest on the Refunding Bands. SECTION 21, Ne Federal Guarantee. The City shall take no action nor Permit nor suTFer .v,y fc on o taken if the result of the same would cause the RefundingxBands to e a Federally guaranteed obligation within the meaning o, Section 103(h) of the Code. My section reference to this Resolution to the Colo shall be deemed to be ani shall refer to any section of similar import enacted in lieu or ire amendment of such section or contained in any internal revenue code enacted In lieu of that internal Revenue Code of 1951. SECTION 28. Amendment. With'" to consent of the bondowners, the City hores,%@r SNU ISnecessarysolrtdesirable, inothey opinion eof Bond sCouns4l, the assu. -e the exenPtion of Interest on the RefuMtng bonds from Federal income taxation. SECTION 29. lleslgnAtf��Tr s/ Agent. Pa ant and tstru. the BMr OF Transfer Agent, Paying Agent and Registrar with respect dL3 thesse proceedings and the Refunding Bonds to be tssutd. SECTION 30, PR110iM,v Offiriai Statament. The Prellmloary Offfcltl Statmaent, ps preps red and- a�ii'wTEf:'a'"L y� a eby approved and adopted, and the execu. elan and dlstrlbutfon is hereby authorized. A copy of tafd Preliminary Official Statement shall be kept :n file with the trarscript of these proceedings and -M31ft open for public inspection. The City Nanagnr, with the concurrence of Bond Counsel, is hereby authorluM in appro,,e . Final Official Statement at or prior to the bond closing. 0 V APPROVED and ADOPTED this dsy of . I9M. ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO CtlCAMONOA STATE OF CALIFORNIA PRIOR CITY OF RANCND CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Or ,n 1 i S STATE OF CAD IFORNIA SCOUNTY OF SAK BERNAROW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, BEVERLY A. AUTIELET, CITY IRK of the CITY 0' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, ixtng Resolution No. was duly Passed, "proved and adopted by the City Council, aoorovod an s y the Mayor and attested by the City Clark, all at the meeting of said Ctty —� I9B Council held on the day of " 6, and that the seat WAS passed and adopte -'-y —M follow ng voice arc AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: CO'^YCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS EXECUTED this day of 1996, at Rancho Cucamonga, Cdltfornia. [SEAL] wY 4 CITY OF RANCIJO CUCAIMSA STATE OF CALIFORNIA