HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/04/02 - Agenda PacketG��CA,N�1 ;
CITY OF
RAMiO CL)CAMMUA
K T
CITY COUNCIL
AGENI)k
1971
Liens Park Community Canter
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cueaaaoga. California
April 7- 1986 -,2j3j e.v.
All items submitted for the City Cassell Agenda meat he is writing. The
deadline Per submitting these items is 5:00 p.e. ms the Ydaudsy prior to the
sleeting. the City Clark's Office receives all seek items.
A. Pledge of Allegian:e to Tlag.
B. Roll Calls Mlkels _. Buquel Ring
Dahl _, and Vright _.
C. Arproval of Minutes: Tahruary 13, 1981
A. Thursday, April 3. 1966 - 7:00 p.m. - BISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMICITC• - Liens Park Community Center.
9161 Ease Line Raad.
B. Veduesday. April 9. 1966 - 7sC0 p.m. - PLANNING
COMMISSION - Liens Put Community Canter. 9161 Base
Line Road.
C. Thursds). April 17. 1986 - 740 p.m. - PARR DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Rate
Line Road.
City Caor <il Keating -2- April 2. 1906
D. Thursday. April 24. 1966 -- 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY
COMMSION - Lions Part Comnity Canter. 9161 Bass
Line Road.
R. Presentation of the 1966 Spring Clem Sweep Poster
Contest Vinne -.s and amotocassnt of mpeoaing clam
wasp campaign events on Saturday. April 12. 1986.
]. ester �1r.�nat
The following Consent Calendar creme era expected to be
routiae and nee- contrwarafal. Tiay will be acted epon by
the Council at sea time without dismaLse.
A. Approval of Vammts. Inlet" Rome. 4 -2 -86 and Payroll
)
ending 3 -20-86 for the total amount of 01.570.220.64.
S. Alcoholic Beverage Application Ro. AS 86 -04 for 0e -Gale
6
Beer 6 Vino Rating Place License. Bramaict
Corporation. Located on Seven. 1056 feet north of
Foothill Borlevard and 1584 fast scutb of Churcb
Street.
C. Receive Claim (CL86 -16) against the City by Allstate
7
Insurance for antosobil• damage on Arebibald /Peron.
D. Approval of Tract lap. Imptovemaat Agvoamant,
9
Improvemeat Security and Coadescitiou Agraaoust (CO
86 -21) far Freer. No. 1]1]1 (D.R. 85-17) located at the
northeast corner of Arms Route and Vineyard Avenue
submitted by Robertson bona, a division of Camil
Corporation.
Risairnag No. 86 -77
32
A RESOLUTION OF TSB CITr COUNCIL OF IBS CITY
OF PANCRO COCAM03CA. CALIFORNIA, LIFIATIN0
TNPRO RUINT AORBDMT. INPR071VAT SZCORITr.
CONDDNIATION ACNBD®T AND FINAL g<.. OF It=
■0. 131]1
B. Approval of Professional Services Agress:nt (CO 05 -22)
33
with Norris- Repta. Inc. for the street lvaluitios study
and final cone- ruction documents for the rabobilltatioc
for various local City strestsa Ramous Avesua fees
Rampabira St. to Foothill Rlvd.1 X, a Aveare frog
Devon 8t. Pampebire St.; Borgandy Avenge from Devoe St.
to Nampsbire St.; Valvan Avenue from Devon Bt. to
4sOabira St.. Devon Street from Archibald Ave. cc
Raw" Ave. Contract ssoaet is 119.350 p1.us POI
contingencies to be famded from Bysteo Developerat.
Ci7 Council meeting -3- April 2. 1986
r. Approval of Professional Services Agreement (CO 86 -23) 49
with Ricbard Willa Associates far the preparation of
roils convection m" wterials teetimg for the Ttrosr
A.essa Improvement Trojan sad the Numb Town nags Ir
Invrcwtmmt Project for na amount of $4,345.00 to ba
funded from MUD and Gas Ism Feeds.
O. Approval of rrofesaiaaal services lgresmeat (CO 46 -24) 77
with seats. srndis A sense, Inc, for tie perforouaca of
rrofessLoeal services with respect to eoestrwetion
management, inspection and stah(sg for Worth Tavm -
rbesn It and Inner tveane Impraeaesat pasjerts for the
amoant of 532.000.00 to be funded it" 107D awes One Sus
rssde.
L Approval to ward 4sidntial street Sehab)litmtfw 93
1985 -86 rbase i project Contract (CO 86 -25) to Z.F.S.
Services :atorparsted, the lancet. reeposmible bidder
for the amount of $38; If :0.
I. Approval to werd Wartb *I4 of rgnhill Rovlward 95
(Chico .Allay) Contract (CO s3 -26) to DtArmcad
Comccrurelos. Invest, respoesible bidder, for tie
Manuel ti 03.647.97.
J. Approval of we Agraemest (CO 86 -27) batwess the Cities 97
of Reecho Cntaaomge. Upland ad Ontario for ep.Lsirg of
a proposed storm drain pats on Grove Aram.. Ramcbo
Cacamoega's conrribstioa :s this project will be
529.416.00.
R. Women of sonde end Notice of Completion 106
and
raithfal rertormeace so" (Road) '66.900.00
SISOLOTION NO. 06 -78 108
16 REMOTION Or TAS CITT COUNCIL air TE MY
Or RMCao CUCAM^ CA, CALM MU, AC=MVG
TM MLIC IMROWDUWn TOR TAACT 9472 AND
AVTSORUISC TIES nL17G Or A NoIICS m
COM MON FOR TS Ton
mossratation goad $ 1,700.00
City Council M%&ting -A-
April 2, 1986
L.
Apptocrl of Professional Snrvices Agreement (CO 86 -28)
109
with DAYS Systuu to prepare facility needs study and
cvalnatiom of City Corporation Yard. Contract 3ba11
not exceed $9,738.00 to be funded from System
Development.
M.
Approval of Frofessicaal Services Agrecwat (CO 96 -29)
1 ?3
with L. D. [ins, Inc.. for the design of eater -Arrow
Storm .rain in Baker Avenue between Foothill Blvd. and
Arrow Brute and in Arrow Routs between Baker Avenue sod
CDCanonga Creek Channel and for Struat Menial and
Reconstruction of Baker Avenue between V-vtbill Blvd.
and 8th Street and Arrow goats, between Baler Avenue and
the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Contract smomot of
$75.500.10 plus 102 cootietencies to cow from Systems
Development fucds.
N.
Approval of acceptance of Utica Storm Drain AD E2-1
141
from Y"rtb Street to Sixth Street ae coawlate and
authorLmLog the filing of a Sotice of Completion.
941 swes
Fratbful performance loud $313.859.00
Retention $ 32,516.57
SMOLOTION 20. 86 -79
143
A ROSOLOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TeI CITY
OF UICHO COCABdCA, CALIFORNIA. ACCLrTIlG
TNB l9ILIC IMFROTZMIS FOR, UTICA MO106
SIM DRAIN AD 92 -1 AND AUTHORIZING Tp3
FILING OF A Marict OF COMPLITIOO YON. THE ROB- -
0.
Approval of acceptance of Alta Loma Store Drain (AD
144
84-2) Improvements as complete and authorizing the
filing of a Notice of Completion for the work.
Releases
Faithful Performance good $1.928.190.00
Retention $ 98,002.11
RIIOLOTION 10. 86 -90
146
A LBOLUYIOH OF INK CITY CWMCIL OF In CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCIFTIMG
INS PUBLIC IMf10►OODiT5 FOR ALTA LOHA STORM
DRAIN (AD 84-2) AND AUTHORIZING III FILICC OF
A NOrICB OF COMMON FOR Tag HON[
N
City Council Meeting -I- April 2, 1986
P. Approval of Lien Agreement (CO 06 -30) between Lester A. 147
Davies and Rebecca A. Davies and the City of Rancho
CYCa01009a for street frontage iaprovemects at 6239
Archibald Avenue.
YESOLUTION 90. 86 -81 155
A X=SOLOTION 07 TIM CIrV COUNCIL OF TEN CITY
OF RANCIIN CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCRttIDG A
LIEN AGUIL490T FROM LESTER A. AND REBECCA A.
DAVIES AND AUIHORIIING TOR MATIR AND CITY
CLINE TO $ICE SAM2
Q. Approval of Lisa Agreement (CO 86 -31) between lay A. 156
Jonas and Be" L. Jones and the City of Rancho
Cucamaga for street frontage isproveoents at 9760
Lamar Avenue.
RESOLUTION 10. 66 -E2 164
A RESOLUTION OF TER CITY COUNCIL OF TER CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. Acarrin A
LIM ASEREMIDT FROM RAY A. JONES AND NANCY L.
JONES AND AUTHORIZING YEN MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN SANE
R. Approval of Lion Agreamat (CO 86 -32) between Ricky P. 165
Millar and Jesans M. Millar and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for strut frontage iaprovemats at 9780
Leann Avenue.
RESOLUTION 10. 86 -83 173
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TER CITY
OF RANCHO C3CAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A
LIMN AGREEMENT FROM RICKY P. MILLER AND
JZANVA M. MILLER AND AUTHORIZIDG IRE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO SIC-7 HARK
S. Approval of hreal Map 8902 located on the southeast 174
corner of gas Bernardino Road and Grove Avenue
euba tied by Robert Kirsbbaua.
RESOLUTION 10. 86 -64 176
A RESOLUTION Or IRE CITY COUNCIL OF TEN CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8902
T. Approval of ?steel Map 8763 located north of 6th 177
Strut, vast of Old Rochester subadtted by Rochester
Tra,ma7 North, Llaited.
1
q
City Council Meeting -6- April 2. 1966
RESOLITIOR E0. 66 -85 179
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITT
OF ]LANCED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8763
U. Approval of Improvement Extausicu Agreements and 180
Improvement Security for Tcact Noe. 9441 and 11609
located on V1laon Avenue, vast of Bermes& Avenue
submitted b7 Cxiamer Davolopmeut Corp.
RESOLUTION No. 86 -86 183
A REVOLUTIOR OF T9E CITY COUNCIL OF TEN CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT ZXTENSION ACRBOWT AND
IM:lOVEMENT BEGURITL - FOR TRACT NOB. 9441
AND 11609
V. Approval of Improvement Extension Agreementa aid 184
Improvarnt Security for Tract Ron. 11781 and 11625
located on northwest cornac of 19th 8t. and Renoea
Ave.
RFTOLOTICN 10. 86 -81 107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITI GCDNCIL OF TO CITY
OY iWCHO CUCAMONGA. CALITGRSIA, AVP1C -rSG
IMPHO3MINT 8273110ION AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEN37T BECUNITISS FOR TACT MOS. 11781
AaD 11625
V. Approval of Igrovemnnt Lire.meat and Improvement 188
Security for D. R. 15-32 located in Tract 12176, Lot 9,
on the nn_theset corcer of Civic Center Drive aad Utica
Avenue.
REVOLUTION 90. 86 -88
193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF cacao CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IIQROVEOST
SECURITY FOR D. R. 85-32
R. Approval of Final Map, Improvement Agreement and 194
Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9301 located on the
east old* of Raven Avenue, South of Arrow Route.
;t
City Council Meeting
-7-
RES011UTION NO. 36 -89
A RESOLUTION CIF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RASCRO CUCLWNQA. CALIFORNIA. APPROIIEL
PARCEL MAP 9:ID1, IMPROVEMENT AGREONOT AND
IMROTQ®I SR:UIIV
T. Approval of Eevircumental Assessment and General Plan
Amadment 86 -0L - Sawdus. A request to amesd the
Lacd Use Map of tho General Plan from Low Deusity
Residential (2-4 du /ac) to Low Medina Density
Residential (4 -8 d.&/ac) for 13.55 acres of ION J located
on the touch side of Paton Boulevard. east of Archibald
- APB 209 -055 -02. 93. 14. (Coetinud from March 20.
1985 watiag.)
1I80LUZZ'" E0. 85.69
A RESOLUTION OF TO CITY CJ L.% OF IPA CI7T
07 EANCRO CYCAMONCA. C1.17OVIA. APrAOTINC
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 96 -01A - Wilt=
1EQ018TING NN AMENDMENT TO Tn uv USE
ELEMENT OF 113 GUM= PLAT FROM LW DENSITT
RESIDENTIAL 12-4 DU /AC) TO LOU MUDIUM DENSl11
RESIDENTIAL :4 -8 DO/AC) FOR 13.55 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATE) JN PERON BOULEVARD EAST OP
A1CRIEALD - .1PT 209-05502. 03 4 14
Z. Approval to ward courract (CO 86 -33) for preliminary
demolition servic-es at Because Tack. in the amount of
$9.500.00 to 1D »ter A Butts. Inc. Fending provided
through Cho Psrk Jnnlopmest Punt.
AA. Bet public bear(ab - April 16. 1986 - Final Commouity
Devalopseat Block Grant 8tatewat of C0.1ty
Objectines.
Ap-it 2. 1986
201
202
214
2I5
a,
a _ k
s L7
City Council Mastiog -8- April 2. 1986
n. ; .
A. gwoursS t0 n2Rcucl yel0[inL FOR Por►AI c.wynu 2i4
Pr.fw 1EPIU .
' .D ,
JaW.Ffil W.I. .1. —.1
A. AN 0lDYYANC[_ AML I SE [awSA cO 1wOmG IaR�/•YPif.
GODR___PESAT.IRG SO t[[ OR[ .wp SAIT O► RAT[ L7� Rm
ill�lOtzi - Consideration of amendments to the City's
Fireworks Ordinance as directed by the City Council and
proposed by the Rancho Cucasnoga Fireworks Sass Forts.
ORDINANCE NO. 78-8 (second reeding) 228
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IRE CITY
OF RANGED CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. A=DDG
SECTIONS 8.12.020, 8.12.030, 8.12.050.C..
8.12.190 AND ADDING BECIIONS 8.12.200 AN3
8.12.210 TO CHAPTER 8.12 OF TITLE 8 07 TRI
RAEC80 CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. SKATING It)
FIRhVORKS
E. AN 010x, s[ce A MEG rme RJACM CUrAXQMC, XWXLr& 231
CODE PE1t1ialNG re C1mIT F01 }RYP1r1 OPO ZPArm
ACAn1t is r0ltin rmer mmYCana neP[RIM - T_is
proposed amendsnnt wowld further defiue the standard,
for private opu space mad prowide a broader
availability of opportunity for open spate. (Continued
from December ld. 1985 meeting.)
ORDINANCE NO. 1050 (first teadicg) 234
AN ORDINANCE OF IRE CITY COUNCIL OF IRE CITY
OF THE CITY Or RANCHO QCAMONCA. CALIFORNIA.
AMRNDMC SUBSECTION B Or SECfI01 16.32.030 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RdLATI99
TO PARE AND 19CRIL71OHAL LAND D[DICAIICB
RRQCIA1D=T8
City Council [eating -9- April 2. 1986
dons SUBMITTED
A. R1MM Fee m+rr M oa Asarc.MS:• VI.;Tr= D6 -I - 236
CoaaCLl is requested by uuarroas property ovoevs to
initiate and fors as assassmeat 4i3trict for tbm
constractios of store drains ie the area eas t of raven
Avenue froe tbo Statham Tacific railroad to Banyan
Avwaa. Lards iscluaed in the proposed Distvitt are
tarxastly undeveloped But subject to varioaa
development proposals.
RRSCLCTION 20. 86 -90 238
A RESOLUTION Or TEF CITT COCIC31 OF TRE CITY
OF RANCOU CUCANONCA. CALIFORNIA. MALIBS
DEYICtAnC1S AND APPOINTMENTS TO rULTILL
uspONSIBILITIEN ABD PEtnm DOTI6q Fog
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS (ASSZS9MT
DISTRICT N0. 80 -1)
RESOLUTION NO. 86 -91 240
A RLIOLUTION OF TEN CITE COUNCIL OF TEN CITY
07 RANCBO COCAMMA. CALIFOrNIA. SWWM TRE
ZENERAL NATURE. LOCATIW AND ZXMT of
CQTADI PUBLIC VOWS ABD IMPROTY -MATS AND
SOURING THE PROPOSED BOUEDARIH or IRE Ain
TO /r ASSCSSID TdENIIOr WZ01MLT DISTRICT
10. 56 -1)
RWOLCTION 20. 86 -92 242
A XVOLUIION OF TDX CITY COUECIL OF TRE CITY
OF XUCr0 COCAM:VCA, CALI70WL. HARING
FINDINGS AND DLTIRMIdATIONS Mn SUCTION
2804 OF TRE STRZBTN AND t1CtVATd COD[
(ASSESSMENT DISUZCr t0. 6 -1)
City Council MaatioE -10- April 2. 1956
RESOLUTION 70. 16 -93 244
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL Or THE CITT
07 RAUCRO CUCdMONOA. CALIPOESIA. ;ECLAIIPC
INTENTION TO ORDER TRY CONSTRUCTION OF
CERTAIN IMPROYMNITS IOCETHZR VIla
AMITIMANCIS IN A PROPOSED A- °SESSMUT
DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF IRE
aMORICIPAL IMIOVEhpT ACT Or 1917 ";
DSCLARINC IRE WORE TO RE Or MOIE TUN LOCAL
OR ORDINARY SMFIT; DISCRIISIC TES DISTRICT
TO BE ASSESSED IO PAT THE COSTS AID EXPENSES
TRERE07; AND PROVID13G FOR TEE ISSUANCE Or
BONDS (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 30. 86 -1)
041004a -, ..'
M• • Ij 14 $ �'1: 6 �I• 11 ••I
.NON
1. Co 2 CAL aa. CaVla. And Cod• aP Coacher - Mayor
Xing tad Mayor Pro Tam Dahl.
2. Caaaa Ee iiaaecln• - Couaoilaeabera Buquat and
Wright.
•.r brP JV •PrbMNP�JyppdOIYYNNNRrrrN••VrN 'd •j
JWOOOryWWmWbdi l.O drVrMYWprpPd••r yd.pYPN000 �>
f N
= F(1nnTsn�nrfn•mPrWT= mpmp•. }S�r> ^Y } } }Y }Y 'm P
Z ) >S YD9
<�y�.T•vr�nnnoRii.°.i N.ra ii..W.m r.N.rrWmr «�.^. ^ynnn i °
o0a asYSr$
r'���.a mPeT• mn> zn m rry n.. }rr xocmaaa
i zasa o•: eorprn an.r. a..nar r nxzT i
r a °r •°••oocniiY rx.z..m�lmn.r.i nzoiioP •' �' �
y�er ^oz rzzrmT. -a P N Nrm oz ^Y> c� mra ' o
roN r °i °.m..��a rzo'zs�r Yx�. o°MZNm ¢n¢WN� R.m i
.ai.>oM�w rna.�� zoo �r�g:l �.-x .4•�••ri RnN S.N.. `.•N s
�''s Yw ia�i o �. •Nn � n ^z ir.••. - ni�Nm ^ <�� y
z a.N.zo �i cs n n'• n ..a•T inz Ix. °aiaTa �.s.. `n rnn y
nT €'r an xr oo i N a nnirmmm N
> ° > o ° ��z s••° 1
ayY OY nY in ^'r'T
N > °z.:n S i
i °�
N N n n i
x 1 i
rprz TL•• erena aa.ren a�ymNnrrenTrr '
>YN.31�g cr to •.o>mm�m >zrr�m ocmma ZZ<
i.yazV'.•tN ^„r n'..mT <N yr rT nryry. •.yym n.+rL'x 1z.S•.Sr i
^D9D'+n9T <��wnCDnn n•^. I>•wr+N n•'S O>^Drar�a�rrn '•'
�>ixur :rmaaWm <zi>a v.A.o mri POYm ^ri�i- N.visro� io
xmn n oremre o°! rNOmN�NNVOOT> m€sms �.m+
Woz r °zx Ri yTn'Tn�szseN r.o s nzo
iir rno:'•'ao s= 1�n��o`� ss.�° a <.a•a mmi im- �°.z..'- .a
ar m °AZNtion o �"a a�: -'mWS eez 1
Ne •. nzmriiYN io s rTnmti �mb cr 1
x�s+n x �TrH Lmrr ••n i
M' M'°C1b• On' ONM a`NmN'NT�!' 1
aY. -Yi iiz<rmi° .s..i �.N.. �s°PP o .^••^ sru" MMA c '
nn nnMO >nnro ^ ^iN °O.°. ^nnn nnn nn rn n•nnn
�°. o`r n'•N•.� °nr- °i-°.m °.yye ..e ry �oosc••�e i
.zx .xr n ^= F.z�.'r' srxa x�zz rz..m TT ii vr,..x...x.• �
as aRNmyaDS saW anaa na as aapnaaa 1 a
gg rnm.•m=
Yrmm Tmn Trrr rr r` rmnrmm ' ^
NN Nr wrij NN .xnNP N'NNYS• N•<n �N .xwM mN.xi•N 1
1 �
1 Cn
OVOOCnOOn000j000000= VJnVOOnOO n0000VV000 IL !,
d ^`•oP ^o ^ ^ ^o�000e�`o oonooe:oo •' anco �e oT+�ob °v r^• '> z
pmbObrrrr+rJyry•.p PpPSPPp RRP
OdprpPJWUrOdb rP NrOdP•. >MI.YNrOdbyPPJWNrO It >
1 it
1 >
IL
w+.oWN is
p..: .. PW Un.•..yYr•. �rU Yr�nl�•Q 1•NN PrIPPOpd IY '•
�'YO r rnJW m. .......... UI•VUn..b VFPNYMy Ix
UnrUJ.d pON PI•nPWUpnOd OYr ONROOP Rd00••OPPr!
Vbr7PMYVPOR n.•p bOnOnEaP+W +••000nronpo:opa
1 F'
rpNPPVYCWP pWJp WdNOOMNPVrPO u A 4puYr
JppOM V•N•M •V•Ir� ~PNV•f!!••W NJ.J rC WOO d.IV 4dVOOPUSpN
JyMNNNPOrVVVdOrrMdNVV ✓ dJMNOYrY
•Pi xay ^T ••m> TZ9� c•. O >•• nm1�Zr: }2�•+Yr
mo °m= sz «NON°rym stssr o
K•- n. N }ion arrem n N norr�n
{tt •aim �yrr SrSOPr£i ..n �a�zeo x. Ns'.>oczic�Nn:%+rn-
.x..zA o�mml: uni li"r.�iNC+ ZIarN n n no �r z ». m}�
arzNr}T NTC <r.+s�r`i m+ aT.°..na °w Pr
re i�T.m mon¢ ormm�:z -• an zyai� soo
rMZ NrT n ntri m nA (•� n •. T
� s E' ar m r N >.}- xr- x•. ^is.n.�i ar+
nN i. �m �:� � .n.. � •za
SrniONnrnrrTPaNf.0 (�C:wT »p1C;On1T D.>iPT Oiri.P Omn
m�>w >V mr> >OTTS n•.a TOrD Orn LrT
Tm „,r +N T°O}rTNx O..rCrmrrrrmTmmYrnf. }r�rr
Mx-z3% •. IN.O =.m OrNTAN =;T
I r }L n sdNN�9'
rTTm S]A •. r C +N N�Ni m ^•. <P n'T V.T ^ r
^T.•00 mm> SC O J f' .
. N
n rya+c mi. �� .o..mi miri nn °w=zz �°rn 5 r}xs� �r-QQa ,o+nl� _nn
OT nLOr�r T1 ^N p al=r •
S a..•2r% .( mm2 L }Cni� i'n vvm } Li ST I.i
mn(L�mmi m PnT Nn rP�D00 N C� wi1 O< YN
OCZCTT r (LL L Ya nD2 m ^m S S r
Ll, nn M1:. Tiro r. NYnn «� �nm Nnnn nn i n
oo.N�.ni” i••iv�n� � r.J.�n. ..°.r .°.. rr r�yo ny n (
Tyr �' m zsaraT N aiT zz z�
c i+ n +rniiaT AA
AA T
aae Tv YI�2iYA a ...o anno °s na 9aa va T a
it cP. as z _
_ P
79 rnNCr ml�rPr
NN/` '•Zr. mLp� u J }M.Si. ^ .JnM NS p w
Nn<AN NuiiN N S
«n OOOO Oy 002X+ n O 0000ynOy VO 2 n VO O n O On O OC OCV
r NNrNV- NNrrrr +r =rNr OOnpOr n 00•✓<d LidNn OS•y
V ^.a6 �PNlVNrOdO •.CNIVVrOdP VP MIYVWnii.JPNJVMr
•• V N r0 r rN
+�rp NflPWUlUUyO JV VAd «NrMV NJlr NMP J.IN ^gOY61FN
MNMOnNPVMY.. ............. O..... NV Y••dO rUP
P•1'SC�N•N SN NOIOONP ^VOPOrOnOVOp p 4 POJWdrn 4 00
lE
O 1
4 N
m 1
m P
T
9
i a
O
C
L '
a o
P
9
a n
N
+
M
...
.`.padWlrYOOp V.•..a.•O DpOO.. >OP.•O1V.'J.•
Yy. .
CM ON D.•iNYVOrrrVdfOOJY..P MPlNOPOdMPaO
nYp.. rNOdMdWOMJpdfONdpMN..Y Y°•D
Pzozzzizsz�:..z isnr Yuri i�ra i.z.. i°x`YSZrzs zzzo +o
v mi\.>.r °c ii.xii `n an 1,gza °sa�on.°.i�n.Niin c.°...•.i -.2
o S. R.z Nrnn ay..z ex o.+
vNViz �zsww N•+ z�.ow .xY mi Nin
�v c. -nzTT n..nmr�T nr�.m ens y... «� cep• .
> oizn<e•. -wNnwn s.-a ..n a ° or�� as
y�zyyam rro
>o
o- iosazz ni is..r {: mi.R ie`- : nrimarn -ornK c9 ex
ynnz <n� >nnwzc�np ao �o�iv�a� on-c n °S '
>N. Ngm n
rsNN a Rio .. �z i n o +� zo z•
-NNCr <z nrab+a n r o
u
z
z
r. a
Sr
an
ON
00
w�
i
n
Pzzo�+�a rr�Q TTT.. ^�n<«ar- iz•°nzT
iT szi 4.i.?b.>.o
nxzo a.•yNxaSVazmNmz a
a �`i nb ozrrzn°.po» n�ia n.<T �-.r dN<
1••S.. N< SOr yS>w a0 t1T S..O Da 01
ZnaT ^ COn< w.iNNC � In >2 in
TI. nnVf... TS i 9iI'S �Si'i� -a Ky
.•NC nrn �..yt i •°>�•.Or..rN » O
m - �nrsrm n ayx a
nc oN'•� az N.�.w «.� navo r.Y�� v v..c
nao z. stir °z .iN. .'i.T Oma i.N w�..
m�zi norn ii mwN yr eNm a <^ am
A «s>ro
F
N�.. > <�n> inn z1 N.D+c n woc
-.. �1 ^ F+ui V. naO' ° i q-<> c< 9D!
r�• msv-•r i yrr .y n
.in S.i. T •i• n^n. T\ ..Si ` i\
T na ay� aaa
a P1VMVp Nr.ii� N V
�000��on000�yvoy��ovonounOOO OOyonvyo
now•pra PN <D. °P..°.na o.Nl� owMPw` ��i`riirirur. :i `+u
yV U..OdO..PN! VM- OOm..PM
y
° a0 ry
9 T
< N
m P
.n.
w
r
°e
ii z � ti
i
r T
v .a
n n
z z
i a
MN
olio
lYU
��ooRPao�so�o:.aaoaa�aoa :'sawti »� 000;:'s »� :so
WE
v
n
O
n
1 ti
Y
a
a T
i Y
t�
lb.pIr NPPJOpN�eM�P NY�YVdrYMbPPPwr�PprPNNdO
POYOpPVVVO.O pdOpPPNVpPVpQNPOVrrwObbrPVdPOy
PNi «N «uP « « «m a FrFaaaa a aaaa.. .. P
r>zzmm »Y >a�Q� n>Yi :ir aQan�X u.Fr iz
T�- Or<y< wS <P< >N^ �O/i� rl!�Smrnnn« 11�� wPrr
aarT2rPTPT naiMH >•OSZSapDDD�a P'n Py.>sa
n «r, nu -u PQP>P w>� crr
«a <OmLDD cu <s i O zi>s>z2 w ryro0
O «r Ti�Z2yE T�mM�>yyT r >Pwn yyCPCOT«w i O (�
ZY_222 <N > >y aymFN Oa Oaf............... 0 >O
>_ >Oy >•• >000 <ONN p•T > GSIIEbbw02r90ww}
m mPO�am222 IPw °CrnO)N «f oOOyypir �yaC �Cw«
NiyPO MOnO r >nnQ r E ((��� 2
I 9 rnn^ a rT < < «>Y�mm «PnS fl «N«
> m000 OP D n yPO. m4
ern rsz °s
z•` n o
rN- m `bz. n
n
z
� w 4
<.ui! +ai ^p l�a...ui o iR.u. sTmui.vzdir a
n ^�� u «yEF rPna7.. uT wnnn zs�mtC
nNrn an nnww nn n•u nnn nnna"ion N.wizn
zoo <P POi�nuP �P «P�n �« JQn « �, rma
ma -x zi irizi En i
,
r
�J
I
J
Nl
�i
,I
' s
s • I
f
0
G�
i„
Mi
E
j r.w.ww .M re�wn �w�Y
r�+MrdlliYS 1.'yr vY
i ir.Y�e rrr�r
r
R U
r��.rwr..r rs
rM N 1MUtli r;wv*
nup N OYY S~
;�, n d.
W" ONNINAc
a Kaa
�.�..u..ae. a
iy.er � J_� --
arwrs+wwnmd
Irf
® I RrO w { ULM= C..W w rr �- .Jllytf.11li�.
�r�. r�r .�rrr�rrwrrrr��wsr��...rww..
w�rrrwrr w�_`r ��w wwyr.�w. r.�rr�rr rim...
'; Wd a4U."0.,
SA...rrn..
AMMWA M it vvm M
f q F..
i
I�
r
.terry
'; Wd a4U."0.,
SA...rrn..
AMMWA M it vvm M
f q F..
r
Ah1. Clair far death, 13jory to Parton, or to personal property wt be riled no later
thao 100 days after Me occurrence (Gov. Code, 300. 911.2).
2. Claim for dampo to real property mist be filed no later tbm 1 year the
ooeurronee (Gov. Cede, 3.0. 911.2).
M MY a an= Cocrwa
m a o w s ad•
TO - �7�� ,��c_, �. 57'a.� L
ddnss WiS ch LPL leant wL:coo nettles es
tW did damp or injury oeeuey /!� -:mil
t did dare or injury osoury tjl,rutLA lltlrs�
tilt and uader chat o1m. unstances did damp or ie)wy oaevr
VW particular action by the City, or Its •*hyena, Caused the alleged damge or
injury? (Include canoe of mployees, if know).
tit! sun do you claw laolude the estinatad scant or any prospective loss, insofar as
it my be Imovn at the tine or the preamtation or this claim, together with the basis or
cosputation or the astcnt olaised. (Anton estimtes or hills, it possible).. }�(
Ala 74 CT g - S.
Total dmamt Cleland:
MM and addresses or witmsms, dootore, end bogitaL:
Hate ' slpswr• ,� e
303(070-ACM —'
i
TN
Dtict
B
YNC'AAri
J
Vilt51W1A PMC
SWPPsI*
GiWRAL CONl4W4L-
d'u .�
�ia+c�vi.ClortR AI41Y30 '
la'W "IOKTN of' IYKT,414"
Coaat4 Of ��MIiGAIM1I .
NAVRM AUL.C�"r'W��a. w
.y
Gtwa�At. twa1.4 tiwea�. t
a�wreelt: Abtlw -r Arpai
�Am 7 i%AUMi '
Q
RVD Gwrdol. Arr
i
SH'I'N a 6l1►A�AI tGIMwRGAt
'
EASY 7k&M iAIM Ii4Wpj;4K
C4►W {rQM6i
faa Cc"
-60-m I CDPt*Wat/c-
I I
:p
30
P p
t
z
On Monday, 1/13/86, I was attamptinf to leave the offices of Cucamonga '
i
School District in m�, auto to go to Rancho Cucamonga Jr. High to perform N function;
as school psychologist. Archibald Ave. was torn up and under construction; :he I
two southbound loose were completely torn up and barricaded with widely spaced i
cases. There was no clear means of entry,or exit from, my place of businecc or '
any other business on the west aide of Archibald. In my attempts to carefully
get bock into traffic (South) and then turn East onto Faxon when traffic appeared
cear }-i both directions, I was a truck by an auto moving South resulting In
damege to both iehiclea. Ed Witham, Deputy Sheriff (SR County) acknowledged that 'I
there was no alternate route I could have taken and that the area van dangerous.
He, in fact, informed me that there had been another accident about 25 minutes
prior to ours, in the Sane area, resulting in injuries#
The construction contractors employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
were neglgent in marking, and making safe, entrances/ exits to and from places
of business an the West side of Archibald at that time.
i
N
CITY OF 1LU4CHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd d. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Alreement, Improvement Security and
Condemnation Agreement for Tract no. 13131 (D. R. 85-17) located at
the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue submitted
by Robertson limes, a division of Catwil Corporation
Tentative Tract Mo. 13131 was approved by the Planning Commission on
October 9, 1985, for the division of 11.71 acres into 1 lots in the Medina
Residential Development District located at thn mrtheast corner of Arrow
Route ani Vineyard Avenue.
The Developer, Robertson Homes, is submitting an agreement and security to
guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: !172,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: S 86,250.00
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary
school districts and Cucamonga County Mater District. C.C.LR.s have also been
approved by the City Attorney.
Condemnation Agreement
As Council is aware, as a condition of approval of the subject tract, the
Planning Ca®issin required acquisition of rights- of-way and improvement of
Vineyard Avenue and Am*ow Route of two out parcels surrounded by the
project. Due to recent successful negotiations, Robertson Homes was able to
obtain all necessary rights -of -way along Vineyard Avenue but have failed to
reach agreement with owners of property on Prrow Route. In order to meet the
Planning Commission requirements, it is 'necessary that Council enter an
agreement with the developer stipulating that in the event thit negotiation
fail, the Council will exercise its rights of eminent domain :o obtain the
property. Atterthed for Council execution is an 'Agreement Respecting the
Acquisition of Cerisin Real Property. This Agreement stipulates that if
negotiations fail within 40 days of execution of the contract, the City will
9
CITY COMCIL STAFF REPORT
Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement
Security and Condemnation Agreement for Tract
No. 13131
April 2, 1786
Page 2
proceed to condemn the needed property at the developer's expense. In the
event that severance damages are such that it is mutually agreeable to the
developer and the City to acquire the entire parcel, then the developer agrees
to take title to the remainder parce7 and incorporate the property into his
project.
REME1 nom
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving Tract Hu. 13131, accepting Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security anJ the Agreement Respecting the A'Auisitien of Certain Real ProTerty
and authorizing the Ilayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause
said map to record.
Res submit ed.
L
.fill. a
Attachments
WO
-2 - , . I - 40�1
LA -
Ctrl Of RARCHO tutdrOdGA
I:IrROTERE HT AGREIAEDt
FOR
Tract 15171
aadI And #nt: ALL MEN fe T CO.foen C,lf(et Sites T too o�o.liloni eot`:ei
a olicaelen HAD s•t Of ems State of Cal lforn u. and Of the
lD011ubit Or0lmsn. of of the City of Atecie Cucamonga,
Ca l lfornla, a munlCltal corporation, by and bet told City.
Rafeloafter I&/pred t: as the City 'Ad Roasts." unman
A Division or eltw11 OKD• Oorelna tIT refor7 lea ao js too
lOf lops!,
WITIESSETH:
THAT. WHEREAS, Bald 01101406, 6eslns t0 develop Certain
rut pr.Oert7 le HIa Cllr as to ern o4 the conditionally Approved
sm601 11 an snore as Tract 1!111 1 And
to bt sot Hof Esaid `Cove loon, hoe prerequisite `to `iyrro: &l Of lain
twbdlrls/0n 9oe.ral ly IOCated it ?he nortlu.st corerr or
/lfev Vt. area yin!rard A...
... THEREFORE. Is Is hereby agreed by said City and by
said 01v01 o /e. as fall*.$:
!;.:,,Th.
s uOInte all Drag eat adescribeG ne► gee 6`here. at
of vlenle 1414 soot nt Iron See effecti4 4111 etrt*f
resolution of is the co! cilnll OObe sald `[City n Approving of this
age eeme.t. This asret.ent shall be In default an the 6p foltor-
1.g the first 80nlrars4ry data of amid approval veless an oaten.
sloe of ties has Dines granted b/ tad Clty as hertleaflor Drovid-
.d
1. The Developer may request rn extension of tine to
Con Dlatt the terms esryof Such request full be submitted to
the city to writing net less thin SO days before W uelratlen
*A tf b" t" sea shall contain ! StAttatnt of $!ream$! lace$
eecttsitltiflg the utsnslon of time The City than b.rf the
!!tent t* rlvtev the provisions of this ogre utet, including the
constriction Standards. cost estlaatg, aed Iaproramut stcarlty,
led to require adjustments [earth If say samstamtiat chugs bat
OCCOr red during the term hereof
t If the 00.01aptr falls Or neglects to comply with
Ste provisions o1 t. s ayrecant, the City shall base the right
at sal tin t. clams uld prCrlsfors to be not by any lawful
meant, aed ehtrltlDan LLOHI from tea Developer lea /ar 011 surety
I /m11 Colt ae6 upanSe 1sCn ryes
S. The Developer shall Dravida metered water Service to
each let of sale development in ¢Cordance win te1 ru lAtlonf,
schl6ntms, and fees of the Cucamonga County Wathr Olstrft9at,
ulOUtl04. ore removals mfr any Itemsonnl oaf ian� faIrrigation `watt,
$)Stu Ie eoeJllet with conttruc elan Of .2C0lred Improvements t*
tee tea "Action of in* City Enginter And lye *WAIT Of such water
tJat:a.
-1.
1007 Cooley Dr. De*. 107
Colton, b 91114
/a
r
7. I%provtmtats requlrtd to be censtructtd chill
tonfore to the Standard Oravingc ne Standard Specifications of
to City, and to the Improvement plan sonroved by and an fill in
tee cif l ca of the City Engineer. Said leorovements art tabulated
on the Construction And Bond Estimate, hereby lacorporated on
Vag* 6 berfof. as tattn from tht improvement plans listed thereon
by au
abor The 0erolopor &bell also be responsible for censtrec.
lien of any transitions or Other Incidental %art beyond the tract
boaadar`es as needed for Suety sad proper s,rf,cl drainage.
Errors or ommHS %mm% discovered during c>astrvctln shall bt
corracted upon the dlrectlOn of the City Engineer, tallied wort
due to said plan odlHCatfan% ihslI be covered by the provisions
of %Alt a0retmans and secured by the surety covering the original
planned wort i.
a. COSItPuCtlan permits shill to obtained by the
oevtleper from the office Of the City Engineer prior to start or
vory all rtgalsttnns listed thereon shall be observed, with
attenHOs given to Ilfety procedures, control of dart, not u, Or
other nviiance t0 the area, and to proper notif lcatlon of &&. lc
Millis and City Oepartsentt [allure to cosplr with this
section shall be abject to ere penalties provided therefor.
q. fhe OerelOper shall be retponsible for rtmoval of
all loose rocks and Other debris tram puic rights -Of -lay wItbin
or adjoining raid development re bl
I Vltlnq from work relative to
maid denlopment
dill ut110 Yost done within ,listing strait% $hilt be
9 y pursued to complttlon; the City Shall hall tie right
to ;social% any and all wort rq IIrI :sent Of Vnjvttll ted dfJ a7 1n
emmpletlo n, and to recover all ce tt and upon%! incurred from the
Oeve lopar and /or his contractor by any lawful atsef.
11 Said On•loper shell at all times fog loving dedfu-
tlol of the streets mad masmmrnts In said subldivlslon, Op to the
comptetlOn and aetODtancl r' said work or Improtmmant by ulr.
Cats Ceuncll, glee good and adeouato warning to travel
fnq
Oto lc of each and Ivory dangerous condition en1%tent In Said
itrgt or eesuul, and will protert the traveling public from
such defective or dangerous eeeditlons.
O
honlll the coaotellon of ail loprovtmmmts, herein incorporated an
e 6 , to be performed, O¢h Of laid strtd[s not accepted as
improvements shall be under the charge of said 00veloper. Said
00111Oplr may close all or a portion of any Strut subject t0 the
conditions contalntd In a tempirory street Closure permit, issued
oy the City En Inter, when,,,- it Is necessary to protect the
cu b 11 during tge conttructfon of the Improvements ,:rein agreed
to ft made
:7 parkway trtes required to be planted shall be
planted by the Developer after Other Improver.ent or[, grading
mad t111nnp his been completed, Floating &halt be. as
Drool dad IF Ordlnante In actordanp With the gland.? diagram
:aDDro up by the city community Ot,elo point 0lru for
ht DfrelOper shall be responsible for saint alnleq all tree
Planted In good h,al;h until the end of the uratract
ma lnlf "ante period, or far oat year aftt planting, vh 9cbesar Is
late
I the OerNeper It nspon&Iblt for muting 1&t!bII*hR a uting all condf.
0y the CIV pprswat to th, snbdfr isloe
13
.2.
and ep Inprasesent security p•ovfded herellwlth shall be released
before Such aeceotance unless otherwise provided +nd authorized
by tua city Ceanr•1 of the City
la This agraccent shall not terninate Sash the
2118t1eeace guarantee security herslaafttr dascribee has been
released by the City. Or tntll a es• agreement t➢gmther %tit, the
required IwerOVement facprity has been tubettted to the City by a
SOCCOSSOr to the Aerate nomad, and Oy resolution of the City
Council same has Otrn accepted, and this agreement and the
Improvement stcurtey therefor has been released.
15. The Improvement security to be furnished by the
OPrelOpar with this agreement shall consist of the following sea
qh a 11 be Ia A form acceptable by the City Attornyl
A. TO secure faithful performance of this agreement.
1. A bond or banal by age or more dolt' awlhariaed
Corporate sureties In the form and content
Speclflei by Government Code Stctlan 66699.1.
2. An Improvement Security instrument In the form
1. Am degotlt with Specified
he City of .money or negotiable
bonds Of the kind approved for securing
mapa{Ita pf Da blic .Coles.
I To secure h0oren
and uterialmenc
1. A bo.d or bonds by ale Or more duly authorized
corporate safeties In the form and content
specified by Government Code Section 66499.2
2 An Improvement SeCurltf Instrument in %Go form
and content sseetfled bs the City Attorney.
5 A deposit with City of .easy or mega Vrble
bolds of the kind approved for securing
C A Cash deposit with the City to gwaraatta pymort
by the Developer to the engineer Or surveyor whose
certificate Sellers UP*$ the final Map for the
settlnp of all boundary, lot corner, And street
Oeeteelloe monuments and far furnishing centerline
tie nCtes to the City. The ememnt of tot deposit
087 be any amount certified by the engineer or
sarve7cr as acceptable payment In fail; or, If no
value is submitted, the cash pond shall be as shown
on the Construction and land Estimate contalned
herein
Said cash deposit nay be refunaed as soon as peace.
dues permits after rocclet by the City Of the
centerline tit motes and •rsttea aasuraece of
payment In full fr os the engineer or surveyor.
0. The required bonds and the principal amounts
thertef are set forth 00 pall 6 of this agreement.
16. The Developer warrants that the lop,... sent,
deecrib ed In this agreement shall be free from defects in
setae als and workeansh-p. Any and all portions of tin Improve.
seats found to be effective within one (1) year following the
data an which the Improvements are Scooted by the City shall be
repaired or replaced by Developer ream of all chinas to the
City The Developer shall fur Ish a maintenance guarantee
security In a sum equal to tan Percent (101) of the construction
eat test. or 5200.00 or Is 9reator, to secure the faithful
9arf.reancm of 0ovele0a`f abllgat ll an% as described in this pare.
grapb• The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the
eS tthftl Parfarmince by tat 0yelaDer Of any obligation of the
9arclogmr to do spec fled wart with respect to any parkway
'S'
e.tf.atr �r 5200.00, whi<hl+er Is gfaaar, to MT the "'so"
er forwuoA e1 Oaeleper & eel y silo., as dacIn this 7ara-
)aph. yM maaieaaace 9var ems ac t. -erity .... also tap. re ae
falafel perforu ue by 'be 0, elorer of any obllsatlea of the
OBrrt ogre is d. fvec vim Yert wltA retNCt t may Parlmay
u lnten&na aalesemtnt district 04ce the Improvements hs.e been
accepted and a malctanance guarantee cecOrit) has been accepted
b) the Clty, 'he other fepro+e.est fecsrlly described In this
agreement may we relesced provided that tech reltale Is otherwise
author lied b; f•Aa Subdivision nap Act and any applicable City
Ordlalncl.
17 that* the Developer shall Late net and maintain Bach
public liability and property damage Incer.•c, as shall protect
him and any contractor or subcontractor Porfe,miaq wort covered
by this agreement from claims tar property dem&ga . ►Ice nay
ante because of thr nature of the Yart or from 0 crat tons [fide:
this W1241nt, whaslhe, Such oper&tlell be by +,msrlf or by any
contractor or {otcoativactor. Or anyone directly f Indirectly
en Pert"
s, by said Derls, eves change such damages be not aped
by t {e ngllglAct we the mareleper or any contractor Or
subcontracto, fir Aoyo.r 03010yad by said persons The Pa ►lie
ll abfl ley led progeny wage Iq.ance shall list the City as
addlto..I insured end a tally protect as CIt /. Its elf /cert,
[gab and employees, a all a a& Developer, ors contractors
aaf hi tobto etractors •nd BII Iesmar sect policies Ifluvd
her dun( fM11 so state n mimin•m :::vets of swa Insurance
shall be a follows:
A. Contract*?'% I ,blllty Iasert.te prodding bodily
Injury or deal liability limits of at Ices the
S300.000 for a Parton and $1,000,000 for each
accident d- OCC, nice, and property damage llAbll-
Ily limits of aO act than $100,000 for eacb see"
dent or of "0 with a aggl aayt& limit of
t250.00 0 far CEB,e ,11th may arase from the opera.
slums of the Dore ter In the Performance of the
.art herlin provide
E A,terobile Ilablll,y lass' 48.4 covering all
vehicles Blvd In aB ptrfor.atce o1 this ogrenent
P
r evldlap bodily injury liability limits Of not
last than 2110,000 for r&ih person Bad $100,000 for
V40 accident Or Oc Curre.Ct. cad PC:Ptrty damage
[lability limits of not let, thin $50.000 for each
accident or occorre,ce, .1th an aggregate of not
less than 5100,000 wh lch .,u &rift free the Opera.
class Of the 0er.10PIr or bit Contractor in
performing the wort preen, for herein.
this 08rtlop,r1 s hall bfile .11th then city c at sort ate erg certificates
Of Intprinle Covering the specified 1 • &net. Each such
certificate $hall bear an erdoaem, preelodiag the
eaneellAtl.n,, or redaction In coverage 01 9 Polley evidences by such certificate before the aspiration thirty (10) days
af,er the Clt) Shah have retailed actiflc in by registered
mall from the Insurance carrier
Ps bVideact of understanding the provisions coatalaad here,*, B *J
o/ fns ere to comply With i,::. the Sandielder ban submitted the
fe1lo.,n9 dertrlbed laprO +ecenl apcBel b, and h e affixed his
tlS n &ton hereto:
/S
rr )4
r�
U
FAITDFOL FEIMINItt
trots Pr1a1r11 Asasstt 41'2400.00
1•ll.aer tnauuAts Company
44041 add address of !.relit P.O. b. is".
64er•aaat.. CA 1SIS2
MATptAL AID LA104 PAAt -.et
floe! less A-lot t t etA30.00
llanc• faa�cau• Conpca.
NYN 2nd a�Arss er u
N
nlit
P.O. bst 15201
so cremate. CA 93632
CASO DEPOSIT M010MteTAT106
Tries Principal osetetf 6 L.250.00
ate ud eNress of uret2t
MAlltt*AACt 00AL4LjT[t
Types Pr Isc IPAI A+1.at1 N/A
same 484 addr.ts cf f.rtlyt
To at POSTED ►11OA To ACCIFTAICE ti TWt clif
to WITNESS WlelOr. lea esM41% Gcrete have ca.tad thtf
protests to Da 4012 maocat.o and rieeNlogled rltA If�
formalities resalres y it. 'ta Oates -Very ap0ata tAal
slluuras. �/
Data t- 2T•16_� y
Oesatapr
t.. tri
t1t•ld V. rights,
r a.
Date — by .oes.Lnr
Accept dl
Oill C ►sacAc CerUSets.
toll /grass
•.. Sla4.1 4t.sralles
caiwi MAr2 AfJCW VLt00 M"
Sam a
C 04, .ftmv. gal.h.. e... Il1[a taM•M
Ce.rl.l j }}
atrsAw.tas
t
nalaUtAa 0 S 1x1
CUT or RAPIWI corstv"
maot4tfr rmtlr m xxAf
umt 0oes an Imlero cm 0 too for
Witt" Permit cr pereAmt m,"Iti
L.I.
P-LC. mmq . 221• C.r. Se• letter
tvlt L.r.
P.C.C. Ora . r CJ. 24• pttrr
L.f
F.C.C. curt "If
�Z I.r.
A.C. ltrs
• !b iJ.
4• ►.C.L Hewett
r., Lt.
Orin ypwq
• n. S.F.
,M P.C.C. Cwt ",ter Ila. ew►)
C.I.
Stan anrula
C.I.
Alrwtu oAOUaau
t. 4M S.F.
MOMUta of L"&A*
S.T.
wBAee •". Nis torr IAA UIC47
TOO
A.C. oror un tows)
to
A.C. in m Inc up)
Tw
A.C. 000 to 090 wM
Till
A.C. wear S00 tent)
S.F.
A.C. 3. UICSI
W.
PA {Ca A.C. (troC.►1
3. :.. J.
l• Uin •.t. Zsr
W
1r� x21 ttwst AoAer Is U or
!"� 21A.
AAlsu awtr Clem avt to prim
W
Ayrtt ritt. •eh t U orml
•.Sant
;=y_, W
Ilpto
L.r.
•
E IZMAt (I m. 2300 elm)
L.r.
t C e• Cff.Ae. P,
f.r.
Oeterof of A.C. omAemt
L.P.
"mat of P.C.C. a"
LJ.
% sl of A.C. Wo
slam
fW.f4.
"gra
—'� S.F.
Otul 1y wit
T01
Air 'ti Leto
C.T.
co= to ttrettwu
= LJ.
L.I.
IM RU 221{x1 0
2141• PCP 0
L.F.
ilia
721• AC7 7000 O
—� L.r.
4121• TfJ LIM 0
W
Caa. Amts V • 4-
�y_ W
seta amu r • t4�
W
utea LAf:o It • 27
W
Out etr %Iso 41
W
Leal Wwttt" IV
Li.
itectlae itllttwe
W
thtlol Am"we. Ste x004
W
Witt struran, re r307
•.A.
Owd Potts
L.r.
wart Prnl (twtl
W
Obl"m pt•'•tro)
WfAO MWer
5.7.
LJ.
umUU7lea L Irvipilee
W17 IP.C.C.)
curb
VSIx DHG forymim 7C1 Mr. OF rx TOTAL
MILMOUTICIRI 6OCATIOR CtSt _4WA. tACitfr IA M1T1w0 M, OCOil it
WeSIT t f) MUM a IM
(Op A ,
Ig I CA41) ZUL^
Owllt0
SUBDIVISION
SMUTIC 40 MFOEMSCT
(SETTM OF FINAL MONUMENTS)
City Council
City of Rancho Cueasaega
p. 0 ffa 607
Rancho Cucamonga. California 91770
Gentlanen:
fursua,t to Chatter 1, article 9. Become 66497 of set Government
Code, tee undersigned bereby agrees this ell senwmenti ihawn as
the final Sao of _S i 1 are to be 11t
one furslshed by the sup t erls angiaier or sorteydr an Or
beta.. n.rc t9-,rT
as specified 1a the
Emg011%, or prreyorii Cortill,oto an :%re's 1C formish the
salts teereos to ceuplete all engiuerReg re0dbenents st eclf NO
Is ACt1aA 66197, of tea Goverment Code
the undersigned beefs you herewith the sae of S 1.350.00
ak a Ca-.b deposit, sold deposit to sutrantmt t6F a miTi p f
•111 be vet and the actef Watteau as above provided as or
before tea date specified and that toe engiater or tareeyor will
be paid by the undertlgoed.
It It fl-thor waderstocd led agreed that in the eveAt the
on derfyaed falls to complete the above raga Hementi withi, it*
time svecified, the City or timeba Cucamoaga Is memorizes to
co.ot4te Said requirements or cause them to be completed and aka
cot: thereof is to be a e +tr9a age sit fall 44IN deposit, end M,
City of RmChe CeCW0094 it svtberland to make the ucolsarF
transfer true fall calk derollt to the credit for the proper City
food
it It further agreed that If the undersigned does not present
a'tdtoce to sY city f01,c11 that be 1,41 paid the customer or
surrey or for tke fatting of the final monuments, Rod if Res
04s10ter or surveyor sires the oettces proscribed Is Sa:lom
6619/ of the 6dreruent Code, 11, Cl.y shall pay to said uglast
or surveyor, 0* cash deposit herelm aide.
If %no cast of C0mp1et1Ag sold re9wircmenu etceeds the melst of
the cask deposit, the dndnrstgned agree% to pay the 41fIrrence
sttkis thirty (SO) days after rtcefv•aq written Stateev.t from
the C ty of Rancho Cocuonp 1,4cif) tag tee outset of tba
gifts ante between the cash ddeeppp000ssit aad the actual cost of said
Cordially, tf� T(—/
Cordially,
Subdivider
Roh.rtsom some• IDUld V. Fisherl Adaress
465) t9b4Cafafe Orlve. 6ecekto +. CA 17701
Otte 1 -27-86
The depatlter of record (for Insure of lmy portion of the Cash
deposit) shall to
Dallas Christie. 1003 cent. or.. s r. 101. cotton CA ilyta
um ra$$
NOTE: 10 DE SURNMED fOLLT FILLED OUT Apo SIGNED
VIA
-/� V4
AGREEMENT RESPECTING THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
This Agreemeat is made and entered into by and
between the CITY OF lANCHO CUCAMONGA ("City' hereinafter) and
ROBERTSON HONES, INC. ('Developer" hereinafter).
W .11 N_ yS S E T Hs
A. Recitals.
(1) City is a general law city exercising govern-
mental functions and Porers and organized and existing under
the laws of the State of California.
(ii) Developer presently seeks to dovelop that real
property constituting APN 208- 251 -11, 23, generally located at
the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway within
City ("the Development* hereinafter).
(111) In furtherance of the Development (a residential
condominium Subdivision), Developer obtained approval from City
of Tentative Tract 13131 and Development Review 85 -17.
(iv) The approvals referred to in Recital (111) above
were granted sub3ect to, among other matters, the following
condition which is predicated upon the provisions of California
Government Code Section 66462.5s
`The developer shall acquire the additional
dedication for right -of -way improvements and construct
street improvements fronting the a,, parcels and obtain
sufficient street dedications to construct said
improvements. In the event that the developer is
unable to acquire the appropriate street dedication
and has requested the City's condemnation process for
the additional right -of -way, the developer &hall pay
for all expense of such condemnation per the Subdi-
vision Map Act.•
M The property to be acquired pursuant to the
condition specified in Recital (iv) above is hereinafter
referred to as *the Property and is legally described in
Exhibit •A• attached hereto.
(vi) To date of this Agreement, Developer has not
been succecsful in attempting to acquire the Property through
the procera of negotiation.
B. )agreement.
NOW, SHEREPORE, in consideration of _ covenants
contained in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as
followr,
1. In consideration of City's covenants herein con-
tained, Developer hereby agrees to continue to attempt-to
acquire the Property through negotiations for the 30 day period
immediately f0llcwin; City's execution of this Agreement.
2. In consideration of Developer's continued efforts
to acquire the Property through negotiations, should Developer
not so acquire the Property within the 30 day period referred
to in ra agraph 1 above and subject only to City's conducting
a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to California Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1275.235 and making the findings set
forth in California Code of C }vil Procedure Section 1270.30
based upon substantial evidence presented at said hearing, City
shall cause to be coumpnced and expeditiously process to com-
pletion an action in eminent domain by which City shall acquire
the Property and, at Developer's request, shall seek an orde
2 � n
for immediate possession of tae Property. City shall not seek
such an erder absent such request from Developer. Within 40
days following City's execution of this Agreement, Developer
shall either make a written selection of an appraiser and /or
legal counsel to service City in acquiring the Property or
shall instruct City to make its own such selection or selections.
Should Developer not make any such selection within said 40 day
period, City shall do so by and through its City Attorney.
Developer shall bear all of the expenses in City's so acquiring
said interests, which expenses shall 'include appraiser's fees
and reimbursable costs, court costs, attorneys' fees and rosm-
burnable costs, deposits necessary to take imtediate possession
of any such interests, deposits reflecting verdicts as to the
value of any such interests necessary to City obtaining any
final order or orders of condemnation, relocation expenses pay-
able to any occupant of the site, any sum paid as and for a
settlement of any suit filed by City pursuant to this Paragraph
2, and any and all incidental expenses related to any of the
foregoing items. No such settlement shall be effected without
Developer first providing to City Developer's written approval
thereof. If Developer so directs City in writing, Agency shall
process an appeal on any judgment entered in a suit filed by
City pursuant to this Paragraph 2 to, and including, the Cali -
lernia State Supreme Court level.
3. An above indicated, Developer shall solely bear
all c -ovs specified in Paragraph 2 herainabove. In that regard
-3 ��
,i
City shall on a monthly basis invoice Developer for costs
incarred pursuant to Paragraph 2 above. Developer shall remit
the amount reflected on any such invoice within thirty (30)
days of the date of receipt of that invoice.
4. This Agreement shall not be assigned in whole or
in part by Developer w%thout Developer first obtaining the
prior written consent to any such assignment by City, which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld
5. Any and all notices, requests or other co=u2ica-
tions required or permitted to be given .nder this Agreement
or by reason of this Agreement shall be in w :� ing and shall
be deemed to have been g.jen when delivered in person, or five
(5) business days after mailing by certified or registered mail,
return receipt requested, first -class postage prepaid, if
mailed in the State of California, or seven (7) business days
after so mailing elsewhere in the continental portion of the
United Status of America, or the date of actual receipt as
indicated on the return receipt, whichever date first occurs,
or ten (101 hours after the time dispatched by telegram or
cable, iA every case addressed to the parties hereto as follows:
A. It to City, to:
CITY OF RANCHO,CUCANONOA
P.O. Box A,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 �V
Attentiin: City Engineer
and
-4-
MARKMAN 6 ARCZYNSRI
Number One Civic Center Circle
P.O. Box 1059
Brea, California 92622 -1059
Attention: Mr. James L. Markman, City Attorney
B. If to Develope•, to:
ROBER'aJl. HOMES, INC.
1C,; Cooley Drive, Suite 102
Colton, California 92324
Attention: Mr. Gary Mazur
or such ether eidress or addresses as the party addressed may,
from time to time, designate in writing in the manner herein
specified. Any notice dispatched by telegram or cable shall be
reaffirmed by the sender with!n twenty -four (24) hours by mail-
ing a confirming letter in the manner hereinabove specified.
6. In the event that either party hereto brings any
action ..t law or suit in equity in relation to this Agreement,
or to declare such party's rights under this Agreement, the
prevailing party in such suit or action, on trial or appeal,
in addition to all otner sums to which it may be entitled, may
call upon the non - prevailing party to pay a reasonable sum for
its attorneys' fees and to pay all other costs and expenses tt,at
have been incurred by the prevailing party, either directly or
indirectly, in connection with said action or suit, as shall be
fixed by the court.
7. Nothing in this Agreement, whether exp.essed or
implied, is Sntoaded to confer any rights or remedies under or
by reason of the trans and provisions hereof on any person
other than the partios to it and their respeuti,'e successors
r and permitted assigns, nor is anything in this Agreement intended
q llf.t''v
-5- a3
to relieve or discharge the obligation or liability of any
third person to any party to this Agreement, nor shall any
provision hereof give any third persons any right of subroga-
tion or action over or against any party to this Agreement.
8. Unless otherwise required by a specific provi-
sion of this Agreement, time hereunder is to be computed by
excluding the first day and including the last day, unless the
last day is a Sunday or a legal holiday, and then it is to be
excluded.
9. Each party to this Agreement agrees to cooperate
by performing any further acts and by executing and delivering
any and all additional documents which may be reasonably neces-
sary to carry out the terms and provisions of this Agreement,
and each party to this Aqreement agrees that it will not act
in any manner whatsoever which would hinder, impede, interfere
with or prohibit r make more onerous or difficult the perfor-
mance of the other party hereto under this Agreement
10. To the beat knowledge and belief of the parties
to this Agreement, this Agreement contains no provision that
is contrary to any federal, state or local law or to any regu-
latory requirement or other ruling or regulation of a federal,
state or I, cal agency or that, would be in breach of the obliga-
tions of either or both of the parties hereto under the terms
and provisions of any legally binding agreement] however, if
any provision of this Agreement, or any part thereof, shall at
any time be held to be invalid, in uhole or in part, under any
applicable federal, state or local law by a court of competent
Jurisdiction, or by arbitrators or an administrative agency of
the federal, state or local government with proper Jurisdiction,
then such protieaen or a portion thereof, as appropriate, shall
remain in effect only to the extent permitted, and the remain-
ing provisions hereof shall remain in full force and affect
and sh+,ll in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated, unless
the invalidated provision(s) shall uniquely, materially and
adversely affect the rights and obligations of a party to this
Agreement.
11. No delay or omission to exercise any right, power
or remedy accruing to either party to this Agreement upon any
breath or default of the other party to this Agreement shall
impair any right, power or remedy of the non - defaulting party
nor shall it be construed to be a waiver of any such breach or
default, or acquiescence therein or thereto, or of or in any
similar breach or default thereafter occurring; nor shall any
waiver cf any single breach or default by either party to this
Agreement be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach or
default theretofore or thereafter occurring. All remedies,
either under this Agreement or by law, equity or otherwise,
shall be cumulative and not alternate.
12. This Agreement and the instruments particularly
referenced herein contain the entire and exclusive agreement
between the parties to it, and no promise, representation,
warrant or covenant not included in this Agreement have beers p /
as
or are being relied upon by any party to this Agreement. All
obligations of City and Developer under this Agreement are
expressly stated, and no other obligations, conditions or
covenants are to be implied noreunder. Each party to this
Agreement has relied or is relying upon its own examination
of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the counsel
of its own advisors, and the warranties, representations,
duties and covenants contained in this Agreement. Moreover,
the terms and provisions of this Agreement may not be changed
orally, but only by an agreement in writing duly executed by
the party against whom enforcement of any waiver, change,
modification, extension or discharge is sought.
13. This Agreement and any amendment thereto may be
executed in onu or more couaterpartn, with the same lecdlly
binding effect as if all signar.+ry parties were signatories tc
the same counterpart. If reSvested, any signatory warty hereto
will furntsh the other party hereto with a duplirete original
counterpart of this Agreement or any amendment thereto, bearing
said signatory's signature.
30. The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall
not cause the parties hereto to be construed in any manner what-
soever as partners, joint vegturers or agents of each other in
the performance of their respective duties and obligations under
this Agreement. or subject either party to this Agreement to any
obligation, loss, charge or expense of the other party unless
the party to be held responsible has independently contracted W
wi.h the claimant •o Ls to make it directly responsible for the
L performance and /or payment, as appropriate, of the pertinent
} obligation, loss, charge or expense.
15. Should any provision of this Agreement require
Interpretation, it is agreed that the person or persons inter-
preting or construing the same shall note 1
2 PP
a Y presumption
" that the terms of this Agreement shall be more strictly con-
strued against one party by reason of the rule of construction
: that a document is to be construed more strictly against the
party thereto who itself or through its agents or counsel pre-
' pared the same or caused the same to be prepared] it being agreed
that the agents and councel of all of the parties hereto hnve
participated equally in the negotiation and preparation of this
' Agreement. The language in all parts of this Agreement shall
i
j' be in all cases construed simply, fairly, equitably and reason-
` ably, according to its plain meaning and not strictly for or
against Any of the parties hereto.
16. Time is expressly made of the essence of each and
I
ever 3rovision of this Agreement.
17. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to
the benr at of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their
f
respective successors and permitted assigns.
18. No remedy or election hereunder shall be deemed
to be exclusive but shall, wherever possible, be cumulative with
f all other remedies at law or in equity.
�i
-9-
a�
19. This Agreement shall be construed and interpret :a
in accordance with the laws of thz State of Calif rnia.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
and entered into this Agreement as of the date set forth below
opposite the name of each such party.
7_
ROB S N I•
Dated: —U�j Z By
Dated. BY
CITY OF RANC90 CUCAMONGA
Cased: By
Mayor
Dated: By
—C t— y Clergy
T FAA= t
2
7 AS CNCRZeT 00R STRICT, WAD AIM rOSLTC OLILLTIEF IN.
1 Ma AND OILS THAT CCAT.AfE RIN. rROrRTY is TTOI Cllr OY
OI RATCPO CUCLMX"- COUNTY Or IAS SSNAROINO. STATL Or
0 CALLTOR:IA. DOCRISID AS rOLL0108
7
T THAT ramov Or LOT 12 Or A OUNl0ulON Or LOT L0,
0 COCAWANA YINOlAAO TRAM IS «ratan T AND 10. TOWMIP
t0 1 SOUTH. RAMS 7 WM- W SL3MMI R1 NIRtRAS. N MOON
14 IS A Nor RIND IN WON 20, 1An O. Or NAYS. IN TNt OMCE
1t or TEY SOCC!T 4CCO20RE or "to COURT. DLJCRIRto A:
N rwAms
u
10M P9DVACNVMN§N =1
' �I
ID
oral SNINI AT THEN uunIATION JJ Too Soum7wT LIn or
to
0140 SOT 11 WITS A LIPS tARAtt[L WITHE AND .u.00 ro". AS
/7
NWUITD AT 21=1 ACV-0. NtITIAT rICH TIC rASTCRLT LINT
1S
Or PAID LOT I71 T1CW,I ALOND SAID rAXMJJL =9 FORTH Oa
10
Ot• 09' CUT. tt.00 ►IIT TO A LIU ►ARALLR WITH AND
20
11.00 f=. N NEASUAW AT No" NCGU. NORTKZ= V"
21
"to SOUTP101LT LINZ Or Lot 111 T7UPCC AM LAST PAID
22
rAMLL12, un SOUTS It0 40' 09• WT. 62.00 RLT To A
22
LINP PARA"' SITE AND $91.00 112T. N IiAIORID AT RIO"
24
`4OLI2. SIPTItLT rRON SAID SASTSILT LINE t LOT 171
23
T110R ALONG LAST PAID PARALLIL USS. EWTI OP OS' 03•
n
NTAT 11.00 MIT .V SAID SOUTR911T LIU Or LOT 121 TWNCC
27
ALONG SAID SOULMUT LINE RnTS n0 10' 010 SIR. 03.00
26
n" TO TLC rotor Or 110110109.
29
30
21
.12
SPAT t at L "=U
10M P9DVACNVMN§N =1
' �I
s
aer!
D9D
MrstT •A' 0
I
FARM i
2
i
AN rAtIMDIT ran STUNT. T41AD An VVILIC UTILITlU IN.
S
OTRt ASO UPON WAT CSRSAIS U" Mum IN TOt CtTr or
8
SANCHO CacAmou". COYNTT Or DAN NiGNAADINO. STAT2 Or
6
CALIr0RM, DUCSIIW AS rDifdq,
7
i
THAT FORTWS Of LOT 13 Or A DOSD'9U►oN or LOT 10,
9
COCAIGNOA VIMAAO TRACT, IN dWft O t AND 10, 70WU:p
to
l SOVIN. 'kANOS 7 NUT, SAN USSASOISO MUIDUAI. AS SHOW
it
CD A I7V I'MCD IN DOOR 20. 1`AOt N Or MAPS. IM TIM cMCt
12
or TNt COONTT Or SAID COUNTY, DSSCDUID AN
13
rwUma,
14
13
AMOINNUO AT TU NOATNVIST NAND Or SAID LOT 171 TNDRS
16
ALONG TNS NOSTMZRLY LIML Or LOT 1J SOUTH Ste 40. 17•
17
UST. 7.00 M7 TO A LISS VASALUL NITU AA9 7.00 UCT. AN
MNJISUSCO AT NIGHT ANIT.U. M070 t MA TIC WumtT LIU
t0
Or SAIO LOT ►71 "No" 4"= t"'o VAAALLSL LtNC So0ti Oe
20
U' 46• VM- 110.00 rNNT TO A Un rAMlbi' WITH AND
21
110.00 MIT. AS P=WSU AT RIM A116LU. DOOTSULY rR M
22
SAID DONTUIMLY LINT Or LOT lit Tim1Ct AtOlq LAST SAID
ti
rASALLIL L309 NONTN Ste 40. 17• Mr. 7.00 1`227 TM SAID
2S
VtSTULY I= Or LOS 111 TNTNCt AMA SAID N2STULY LIS2
25
NORTH De 98' 46• LAST. 110.00 Ut: TO THS 1`01NT or
26
210INNINO.
27
26
29
IO
21
ALIT i or i DSLRS
.9•
r .r.l..w�
DAB 1 .. .
110NWAIt�SN N.�g IYrrffY�,.�,w�
AT'lU tANOOt,7 rwiew.,.� °r, Ys r. Y<
EASEMENT
FOR
STREET. ROAD & PUBLIC UTILITIES
ELY LINE Lot 111
•�. BEAR OULQjj
a
n
EASENI NT FOR STREET. ><
ROAD ANO PYBLr YTNTIES. 1 -
•L "~w
{{.OV
V(LY LIZE OF TNC zC
EASTERLY E.SO' J
/ LOT 13 'b'B
ROMOFOle b�
v LOT 13 ^ ^ -I
M 8. 2 ^/44 4I p
s
I 3
Y
LOT 14 ^ <
Lis 2O/44
u ;$ FUTURE
=g I EXIST
1!I{ {TUZQ NLY LIN =LOT IS
a
•o'r.0
Iv0.OQ EASEMENT FOR STRUT. ROAD
AND RUBUO YTLITA!
z[AU 1'• .z0 'gill
lets °a' o n` TES
:9 vi
.'m
RESOLUTION No. O ip' % %
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAM3NGA, CA',T-O;VlIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT AND FINAL
MAP OE TRACT NO. 13131
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13131, consisting of I lot,
submitted by Robertson Homes, a division of Cats.il ^orporation, Subdivider,
located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue has been
submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by
said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California,
and in compliance with the requirer•nts of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements establisk2d as preregLisite to
approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the
Trrroveaent and Condemnatiaa Agreement submitted herew +ih for aporoval and
e ecution oy said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement
S curity, and submits for approval said Final Mao offering for dedication for
public use the streets delineated thereon.
THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho . -ga, California, as folluws:
1. That said Improvement and Condemnation Agreement be
and the same is approved and the Mayor is Authorized
to execute same on behalf of said City and the City
Clerk is authoriyed to attest thereto; and
2. That said improvement Se -urity .s accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to aporoval as to form and
content thereof by the City Attorney; and
3 That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorised to execute the Certificate thereon on
behalf of said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 19h6.
AYES:
NOES.
ABSENT-
Jeffrey King, Mayur —
3a-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Norris - Repke. Inc.
for the street evaluation study and final construction documents
for the rehabilitation for various local City streets
Attached is an agreemeet for Consultant Services for the design of the above
subject project. Said services will be provided in two phases as follows.
Phase I consists of providing a detailed analysts of the streets to develop
specific rehabilitation concepts. In general, this would Inulude oreparation
of a payment evaluation report for the streets and development of project
elements in each street. Also included in Phase I Is the control and
t000graphfc survey. Phase II consists of additional field design survey and
preparation of constructfoi plans and specifications.
The rehabilitation Includes the following streets: Ramona Avarua from
Hampshire St. to Foothill Blvd.; Ramona Avenue from Devon St. to Hampshire
St.; Burgundy Avenue from Devon St, to Hampshire St.; Malvern Avenue from
Devon St. to Hm,-)shire St.; Devon Street from Archibald Ave, to Ramona Ave.
and Haa^f, shire St. from Archibald Ave, to Ramona Ave. Contract for said
project is not to exceed $29.350.00 plus a 10% contingency to be fended by
Systems Development. Prcject is proposed as a redevelopment project for
Improvements of •aw- and moderate - income neighborhaods. If and when the
Redevelopment Bond essue is ctnplete, the design workings 1-111 be reimbursed
from the Redevelopment Agency.
RECDMSFII11ATION
It is recommended that I
the design services for
an ammunt not to exceed
Systems Developme:t and
�%/ .4 rl�
Attachments
i approve the attached agreement awarding
lescribed project to Norris- Repke. Inc. in
I plus a IK contingency to be funded by
the Mayor and City Clerk sign same.
W
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement 1s made and entered into this day
of , ig , between the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and _ Narrls- Repke, Inc.
,hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT').
A. Recitals.
(1) CITY has heretofore issued Its Request for Proposal
pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the
preparatir eet evaluitlon study, Phase I and final construction documents.
Phase It for the rehabilitation of various C16y streets (Protect f2)
('Project' hereafter).
(1i) CONSULTANT has now submitted It- proposal for the
performance of such services.
(Ili) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional
services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning
Commission, City Council and staff In the preparation of Project.
r
(r v) CONSULTANT represents that it is q, lifted to perform such
services and 1s willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter
defined.
NOW. THEREFORE, It Is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT
follows:
0. Agreement.
1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise
requires:
-I-
J
I ,
9
(a) Project: The preparation of street evaluation study.
Phase I and final construction documents. Phase 11, for the rehabilitation
of various City streets,(Project 12)
described in Exhibit 'A• Scope of Services hereto Including, but not limited
to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the
presentation, both oral and In writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports
and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions,
public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the
project as outlined In the. Scope of Services.
(b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to
be performed by CONSJLTANT in order to complete the project.
(c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all
phases of the project. Including any and all procedures, development plans,
maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations
and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project
acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit 'O' Project Schedule
attached hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the
project in accordance with Exhibit W and applicable with Federal. State and
CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all Paps, surveys,
reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as
'documents•) including all supplemental technical documents, as described in
Exhibit •A• to CIT1 within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit
'2'
3S
"B" . Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by
Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions
to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised
documents i-i such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY.
The time 1 mits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon
a written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole Cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, In the opinion of
CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the
event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby
warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services
required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows.
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $29.350.00
for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover
the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees,
Including the work of employe,-., consultants and subcontractors to
CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made to accordance with
the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C'.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in
accordance with the Invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and
such Invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are
received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C" either with
respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks In no
-3-
3jc
event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals
described in ExhiLlt "Co.
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be
required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable
hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all
supplemental technical documents, as described hLrein acceptable in form and
content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services: Paya:ents for additional services
requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as
set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereof, shall be paid on a reimburseaent basis in
accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C'. Charges for
additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by
CITY within a reasonable time after said Invoices are received by CITY.
4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit 'A'
hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other
information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to
complete the project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from CITY
files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information
from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be
CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all Initial contact with respect to the
gathering of such information.
_4_
3-2
S. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY
and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and
other Identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT may, however, mike and retain such copies of said documents and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire.
Any use cr reuse of the plans an! specifications except at
the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications
by the CITY, its staff o- authorized agents without the specific written
consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY
agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages,
claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration
or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or
authorized agents.
6. Termination: This agreement may be terminates by CITY upon
the giving of a written • Nntice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the
event this Agreement is so terminated. CONSULTANT shall be comper-,ted at
CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit 'B', on a pro-
rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the
date of termination. in no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive mo,•e than
the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to
CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models.
photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by
-5-
M
I
CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSUMANT may not terminate this
Agreement except for cause.
7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all
notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties
hereto shall be addresseO as set forth In this paragraph 7. The below named
Individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily resornsible for the
performance by the parts -s under this Agreement: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior
Civil engineer, for and on behalf of the CITY and Warren W. Reoke, for and on
ben . CONSULTANT. Norris- Reoke, Inc.. 507 E. First St., Suite A, Tustin.
CA .2680
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by sail, shall
be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after
deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under
this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a
company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any
subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all Insurance required
of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the foll -3wing policies
of insurance:
(a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Oefore beginning
work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof
that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons
whrin it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work
specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
.6-
,J7
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his
employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certification as follows:
of as aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Latar Code
which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers -
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
of that Code, and I wi.l comply with such provisians before commencing the
performance of the work of this Agrement•.
(b) public Liability and property Damage: Throughcat the
term of this Ag- eenent, ut CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual
benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, g -Aeral public
liability and automobile Insurance against claims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTAYT's activities,
A' a.coo, cco.co 10K
providing protection of at least One Million Dollars (f6OGiv6QPvW) for bodily
Injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or Occurrence and at
"IOW coo. co l'aC
least One Million Dollars Fjb001lDO,�D) for property damage.
(c) Errors and Omissions: CMISULTMT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this Agreisent, a policy or policies
of insurance concerning errors and onissions (•malpractice.•) providing
protection of at least $25_000.00 for errarz and
omissions (•malpractice•) with respect to loss arising frm actions of
CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder an behalf of Cm.
(d) General Insurance Requirements: All iasuraeee
required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only In
-7-
`f"6
n
responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of
California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall none as
afditfonal insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the
effect that (1) the Insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and
CITY's elected officials, officers, enpluyees, and agents; (2) the policies
are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by
CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changcd except after
thirty (30) :ays' notice by the insurer to CiTY by certified mail. CONSULTANT
shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of
them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its
own account insurance not required under this Agreement.
9. indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend. Indemnify and
save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
employees, from all liability from loss, damagr or injury to persons or
Property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and
attorneys' fees in any manner arisino out of any negligent or intentional or
willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in tlx• performance of this
Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the
maximum extent permitted by law.
10. Assignment): No assignment of this Agreement or of any
part or obligation of performance hereunder she) pe made, either in whole or
in part, by CONSULTANI without the Prior written consent of CITY.
11. independent Contractor: The parti -s hereto agree that
CONSULTANT and itf ecployers, officers and agents are i, ependent contractors
pp1 under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be
k -8-
L11
i
il
A,
3'
i
ofsployees of CITY.
12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is
Instituted to enforce any term or provision of the 4greement, the prevailing
party In said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees
and costs from tre opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all
other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect
to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that
no representation by any party which 1s not embodied herein nor any other
agreement, statczent, or promise not contained In this Agreement shall be
valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only
If it Is in writing signed by all parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have ezecut.d this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above:
CON,jULIANT
warren N �1
Ma rrt epke, P
CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA
Jeffrey King, Mayor
ATTEST:
—Bever y q, uthe et, ty lerk
Date: 3 —13 — e4
Date
*Apto jfory,/-�17
h
N'7
u
EXHIBIT •A•
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE 1: EVALUATION AND CONCEPTS
A. Orientation
Meet with City Staff to hold kickoff- meeting. Our appru.ch would be
discussed and necessary criteria established. Information required from
City would be requested.
B. Pavement Condition Evahratlon
A field and laboratory evaluation of existing pavement conditions for all
the streets would be prepared. This would include obtaining, tabulating,
and evaluating pavement deflection data, field observation data and core
samples. Various rehabilitation oethods would be reviewed, and a report
prepared including engineered recommendations. Cores wo.id be taken (14
maximum) to determine existing structural sections and subgrade material
information. We propose to use the firm of La Belle Consultants to
perform the soils and pavement evaluation portion of the project.
C. Perform Field Review
Field review each location to determine the following:
1. Curb and gutter and concrete Intersection reconstruction areas.
2. Local pavement failure areas In streets recommended for surface
treatments.
3. Limitsof various rehabilitation methods.
D. Perform Topographic Suney
Due to the required project timing, the control and topographic survey
wouuld be performed during Phase I. The following would be performed.
1. Establish centerline control and stationing.
2. Establish vertical control from local City benchmark (where
required)
3. Topography within curbs plus location of driveways and pertinent
topographic features (where req:4•ed). Street light locations would
also be datercined.
4. Cross - sections at some selected locations (2 -3 per street) from
right -of -way to right -of -way (where required).
E. Develop Project Elements
Utilizing the pavement condition evaluation and field review a recommended
project would be developed for each location. Included would be
additional street light locations needed to conform to City standards. A
recommended concept plan would be prepared Indicating the recommended
EXHIBIT 'A' (Continuation)
project elements. A copy of the area Tract Hap or Assessor's Maps would
ba used for this propose. Preliminary construction costs would be
developed for the concept plan. A meeting would be held with Cit; staff
to discuss the recorcendations and reach concurre•ice on the final pru;ect
concepts.
F. Oeteraine Construction Document Needs
Upon approval of the concept plan the type and extant of construction
plans and documents would be discussed with the City staff.
G. Perform Utility Aesetrch
Due to the requf -ed project timing the initial utility research would be
done during Phase 1. This would consist of contacting the utility
t -mxnies and obtaining utility location information.
PHASE II: COrMUCTION DOCPEHTS
The following is an outline of the anticipated scope of services for
preparation of the construction documents for the project. The extent of each
task will drpend on the results of Phase I and to agreed upon prior to the
start of work on Phase iI.
A. Field Suraey
Additional field survey information suitable for final design would be
obtained. This could include additional topographic Information and
cross - sections or other :'evation data .s needed.
B. Prepare Topographic Base Sheets
Construction Plan base sheets at a scale of V-40' would be prepared and
shay the following:
1. Street right of way and lot tints from Assa:scrs gaps and existing
plans.
2. Lot lines and tract and lot ambers.
3. Existing curbs and intersection improvements.
4. Location of existing driveways.
S. Utility locations.
6. Location of typographic features within street curbs and other
pertinent topographic features.
7. Profile of existing top of curb and centerline grades (where
required).
These plans would be plotted on City standard sheets suitable for use as
construction plans.
7 7
EXHIBIT W ( Cootdnuation)
C. Construction Oocurtnt Preparation
1. Prepare protect Title Sheet
Preptre plan and p-..file sheets or plan only sheets at a scale of
10.40' for each street showing construction to conform to the
appn red concept plan. Construction elements would be clearly
defined. ' - oposed new centerline grades sad ass c -rb & gutter grddes
(when. re, *au) would be shown.
3. Plot cross sections whet appropriate for desisn purposes only
snowing existing condition and p,zno:ed construction.
4. Prepare bid proposal and special provls;.+ se.tion of protect
specifications using Green Book as standard specii ;=tfon. Project
Information wouuld also be placed on 'toiler plate' prowl&. -a by the
City
S. Prepare itemized c -insturction quantities and cost estimate.
0. Construction Document Processing
1. Upon completion of the preliminary plans. specificztfons and cost
estimate, submit two (2) sets of each to the City of 22=1:3 Cucamonga
for review and comment.
2. Keet witi, City staff to eiscuss results of City staff review.
3. :lake agreed on re0sions and corrections to the plans, speei[ficatidns
and cost estimate and :n- submit as above.
4. Upon final completion, acceptance and approval of the pio-s.
specification. and estimate oy toss: City, provide the City with the
original plans, specifications and itew;tzed cost estiratr.
E. Utility Coordination
1. Plot utility location and information on the plans.
2. Prepare preliminary utility notices and send preliminary plans to
utilities.
3. 'his proposal is based on the final utility notice being handled by
the City.
F. Construction chase
Provide the following services during the construction phase cf the
project:
1. Attend pre - construction meeting.
.3 7s-
EtH!BI1 •A' (Continuation)
2. :larffr plans and answer questions regarding the designs and
specific.tions prepared. This does not Include redesign due to
unforesee: =nditions or field visits.
3. Provide construction survey under separate agreement.
CITY ROPMSIBILITIES
The City shall assume the following responsibilities.
1. %ate available and provide all existing data and information relevant to
the proposed project.
2. Provide eaAm-aental document processing.
3. Provide plans aed specifications for bidding.
4. Provide Traffic Index.
S. Copy of Tract Map and Street Plans for area.
SCMIMMING
KIWIS -WXE. INC. proposes to provide the outline services In accordance with
t_Sr project schedule Included as Exhibit B. The schedule would commence upon
rec�lpt of a notice to proceed or signed contract. The proposed project
scb —lute would be discussed at tte initial meeting and subject to revisions
based an mutual agreement to meet specific requirements of the City.
FEES
IMMISAEPIX. INC. proposed to provide the outlined services for the following
schedule of fees.
-a-
0
f i
of
mlW
x
w
JF _�
CEO
wz:
G
mFu
cu
c3oz
aoc
W F O
r�u
a�
41
C
117
1
1 ,
I ,
I ,
I • 1 1
I 1 1
I 1 1
1 , ,
1 I
I I 1
I ^ 1 1
I 1 1
I 1 1
I 1 1
, I I
1 1
I 1 1
1 ^ 1 1
I 1 1
I r 1
Y 1 . ,
W.. 1 � 1 » 1 w
I 1 1 w
I 1 1
I 1 1 w
1 1 1 1 6
1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1
I 1 1
1
N
FO
w
u
.0
F C
OZ a
r 1 ,
1
1 �
1 i 1 1
1
1
1 , «
I 1 i
1 1 ,
1 , ,
I 1 M
1
I iw
I 1 W
I 1 G
1 C
I O
I M
1 U
1 u
1 r
1 r
� o
1
1 9
1 J
I m
to
I
1 M
I c
N 1 .0
F i q
1 c
i m
I w
i n
1
1
q
c
C
m
M
v
a<
m
N
+n O
Uy
c c
ou
Y
C O
woe
C q
C..CC
d
V
q c
Y O
uc
9 q
uc
1
L O
M
u�
u_c
Y r
t. U
os
c �
+1 4
Eo
.r
P
1
C
1
C
~
1
O
q
Y
to
m
Ci
1
m
C
Y
q
W
Q
y
C
C
1
L!
U
1
O
W
s
E
E
i
to
Y
U
U
V
t
M
W
O
O
O
1
_1
o
U
0
O
O
c
C
G
.+
1
2
O
o
O
O
U
o
O
>
c
C o o
o
°'
++
2
c
u
u
c
1,
u i
C
C
G
N
m
O
O
G
N
7 1
O
O
4
Y
Q
c
m 1
QQ4
>
d
>
G
,
0
W
F
to
to
6
O
U I
q
c
C
m
M
v
a<
m
N
+n O
Uy
c c
ou
Y
C O
woe
C q
C..CC
d
V
q c
Y O
uc
9 q
uc
1
L O
M
u�
u_c
Y r
t. U
os
c �
+1 4
Eo
.r
EXHIBIT •C•
Phase I
Provide Phase I services as outlined in E�hlbit A for the following •Not to
Exceed' Fee:
1. Pavement Condition Evaluation ......... .. ....... $ 4,450.00
lncludirg coring, sail evaluation, deflection
testing and engineer'ng analysis.
2. Perform Control and Topographic Survey........... S 7,000.00
3. Develop Project Elements ......................... S 2.500.00
4. Utility Research .. ............................... $ 400.00
TOTAL Phase I • $'.4,350 00
Phase II
Due to the unknotm nature of the specific construction requirements for the
project until the completion of Phase I, the fees for providing Phase Ii
services as outlined in Exhibit A will be determined at the completion of
Phase I. However, it Is agreed that the fee will not exceed $15,000.00.
All fees would be In-oiced conthly at the followinhg hourly rate schedule.
SCHEDULE OF STANM(O HOURLY RATES
Project Manager /Registered Engineer ............. S 60.00
Licensed Land Surveyor .......................... 56.00
Sr Designer ..... ............................... 50.00
Designer ......... ............................... 42.00
Sr. Drafter ...... ............................... 38 00
Jr. Designer ..... ............................... 36.00
Orafter /Technician .............. ............... 32.00
Jr Orafter /Technician .. ....................... 26.00
Clerical ...... . ............................... 25.00
Survey Crew
j3- man) ..... ............................... 136.00
.2- man) .......................... ......... 108.00
(1- man) ............... ............... .... 76.00
Expert Testimony ..... .......................... 120.00
above fees will be escalated 6% on each August 1 beginning August 1, 1986,
any work uncompleted at that tima through no fault of the Engineer
L/
X"/S" e2w e."r Anff F
CITY OF RANCIfO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Michael 0. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Service Agreement with Richard Mills
Associates for the preparation of soils compaction and materials
testing for the Turner Avenue Improvement Project and the North
Town Phase IV Improvement Project
In conjunction with the subject projects, a consultant is required to test
soils and materials for contract compliance. Richard Hills Associates of
Rancho Cucamonga has submitted a proposal of $3,950.00 for testing of the
combined projects. Attached for your consideration are the proposals for
subject • onsultant services.
RECOMEHDATIOM
It is recommended that City Council accept the proposals for Richard Mills
Associates for testing on the subject projects and authorize the Finance
Director, to expend $4.345.00 (combined proposal plus 10% contingencies) for
said testing, to be funded from HUD and Gas Tax Funds.
Respectfully submit d,
/ allI
l LOW. .sr
Attachments
(r15-'
W
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement 1s made and entered into this
_day
of 19 , between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as •CITY•) and Richard Mills Associates
(hereinafter referred to as °CONSULTANT•).
A. Recitals.
z (i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal
Pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the
preparation of so�i,SpTOectlor and mate rlal+ r rl f DE the T Ave, In
f
0
(•Project• hereafter).
(ii) CONSULTAPF has now submitted its proposal for the
performance of such servires.
(iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional
services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning
Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that It is qualified to perform such
services and is willing to Perform such professional cervices as hereinafter
defined.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CiTY and CONSULTANT as
follows;
8. Aareement.
1. Definitions; The followino definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise
requires:
3/5/86 5r, _1_
(a) Project: Compaction testina o• off -site utility trench
bacifill and off -site fmorovements, and materials testino of asohaltic
pavers -t
described in Exhibit W Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited
to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the
presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports
and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions,
Public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the
project as outlined in the Scope of Services.
(b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to
be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project.
(c) Cmoletion of pro ect: The date of completion of all
Phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans,
maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations
and attendance by CONSULTANT at Public hearings regarding the project
acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit 08• Project Schedule
attached hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agre es as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the
project in accordance with Exhibit •A and applicable with Federal, State and
CITY statues, regulations, orainances and guidelines, all to the reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys,
reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to t
*documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described 1,
Exhibit W to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit
_2.
;J
IMMEMEN
+,x
'B'. Copies of the document3 shall be in such numbers as are required by
Exhibit W. CiTY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT com ent$
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions
to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised
documents In such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY.
x
The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon
a written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT'S sale cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of
> CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the
o event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby
warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services
required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by CONSULTANT except upon L6 prior written approval of CM.
k
3. CITY agrees as follows;
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of sL345 -o0
for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover
the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect tests or fees,
Including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to
CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be Dude in accordance with
the schedule set forth in Exhibit •A•.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in
N� accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and
such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are
received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit •C• eithe• with
respect to hourly rates or lump sum %mounts for Individual tasks In no
a1
-3-
event, however, rill said' invoices exceed 95% of individual Last totals
described in Exhibits W.
(c, CMSULTANT agrees that, in no event. shall CITY br
required to Pay to C0.YS UNT any sum in excess of 95: of the maxlc= payable
hereunder prior to receipt by CITT of all final doaaents, together with all
supplemental technical eoctm+cits, as described herein accepta9le in fora and
content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after
presentation of final docwents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services; Payments for additional services
requested, to writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as
set forth in Exhibit 'A hereof, shall be paid on a reimburscsent basis in
accordance with the fet schedule set forth in Exhibit "C•. Charges for
additfonal services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by
CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY.
4. CITY amWees to provide to CpNSULTMT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit -A-
hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible coples of maps and other
infoa -Ilion, if available, which C0.'iMTANT considers necessary in order :o
cpmplete the Project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from CITY
files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information
fr® other governmental agencies and /or private parties. Powever, it shall be
CoNSULTABT•s responsibility to make all Initial contact with respect to the
gathering of such information.
Y
m r_
-4.
63
S- Q.trt,'Iio of Documents: all documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs a.10 reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agrcament shall be considered the property of CITY
and, upon payment for services performed by MISULTAUT, such documents and
other identified materials shall be delivered to CiTY by CMSULTAYT.
CONSULTANT may, however. make and retain such cootes of said docccnts and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire.
Any use or reuse of the olans and specifications except at
the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications
by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written
consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CrTy. The CITT
agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages,
Claims and losses in:luding defense costs arising out of any such alteration
or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CM , its staff fir
authorized agents.
6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon
the giving of a r.•itten •Notice of Termination, to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the
event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be cmpensated at
X11SULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit •B•, on a pro-
rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project cagleted as of the
date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than
the maxima soecified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to
CITY any and all doesvents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models,
3 photographs and reports, whether in draft or final farm, prepared by
t -5-
J f
■
Y+
CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this
Agreement except for cause.
7. Notices and Desienatel Representatives: My and all
notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties
hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named
individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the
performance by the parties under this Agreement: E. Duane Lyon, P.E ,
Grea Chandra. P.E.
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall
be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after
deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under
this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a
company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any
subcontractor to commence work an a subcontract until all insurance required
of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies.
of insurance:
(a) Worker's Comoensaton Insurance: Before beginning
work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof
that it has taken out full wor ers' compensaton insurance for all persons whom
it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work
specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
a.
-6-
55"
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 3100, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his
employees CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certification as follows:
`I am aware of the provisions of Sectlen 3700 of the Labor Code
which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers'
compensation Or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the
performance of the work Of this Agreement-.
(b) Public Liability and Prooerty Oamace. Throughout the
term of this Agreement, at CO:ISULTANT's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual
benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad foam, general public
liability and automobile Insurance against claims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTAIIT's activities,
providing protection of at least One Million Oollari (S1,Ooo,000,00) for
bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence
and at least One Million Dollars (S1,000,000.00) for property damage.
(e) Errors and Omiss_ons: CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life Of tHs Agreement, a policy or policies
of insurance concerning errors and emissions ( "malpractice') providing
protection of at least S I,0n0.000 00
for errors
and omissions ('malpractice') with respect to loss arising from act ons of
CONSULTANT Performing engineering wvices hereunder an behalf of CITY.
(d) General Insurance Requirements: All insu•.cr,ce
required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried Orly in
W,
-7.
S( o
responsible insurance compSnies licensed to do business in the State of
California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall na*e as
additional insureds CITY, its elected officials. Officers, employees, and
agents. All policies shall con•ain larquage, to the extent obtainable, to the
effect that (1) the Insurer %lives the right of subrogation against CITY and
CITY's elected officirls, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies
are primary and rnncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by
CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after
thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT
shall furnish CITY with copies of all such uolicies pranp:ly upr- receipt of
them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for Its
own account insurance not required under this Agreement.
g. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and
save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or
property, including the payment by CONSULTMT of any and all legal costs aid
attorneys' fees, in any manner arising cut of any negligent or intentional or
willful acts or emissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this
Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential da:ages, to the
maximum extent permitted by law.
10. Assionrent): ho a:signment of this Agreement or of any
part or obligation of performan:e hereunder shall be made, either in whole or
In part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
1 %. Indeoerdent Ccntractor: The parties hereto agree that
CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are Independent contractors
under this Agreement and shall not be construed foi any purpose tp be
�y.6-
F 7 �•
employees of CITY.
12 Wvernina Le,: This Agreement shalt be governed by and
construed In accerdmce with the laws of the State of California.
13. 1,ttorn.,e,s. In the event an legal
Instituted to emPorcc as y 9 Drcceedfng 1s
y tern or provision, of the Agreement, the prevailing
party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys- fees
and costs from the opposing party Jr an amount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
14. Entire Agreement-
�_• This Agreement supersedes any acid all
other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect
to the subJect matter herein. Each party tO this Agreement acknowledges that
no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other
agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement nevi] be
valid and binding. Any codificatlen of this Agreement shall be effective only
if it is in writing signed by all parties.
IM UITMS WHFA£GF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above:
4TAIlT
CM OF RANCID CUCAM - GA
n e s, ayor
ATTEST:
y • the et, tty erk
s'g-
�
Date:
Date:
ADPreeed as to fora:
rTty Attcrwly
MIDIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
(1) Compaction testing of offsite utility trench backfill and offsite
street improsements. services will consist of performing in place density
tests (compaction tests), water content tests, and maximum density - optimum
moisture tests at locations and a frequency selected by a representative of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Observation of compaction methods used by the
contractor Is not included in the scope of our wo -k. A written report
summarizing the results of all tests performed will be prepared upon
completion -f the work. The report will not be a certificate, or warranty, of
the compaction of the materials tested.
(2) Materials testing of asphaltic pavement. Services will Include 8veem
stabl:ometer, slevr analysis and extraction tests of asphaltic pavement.
Tests will be performed on materials sampled at random locations and at
frequencies basedon the City of Rancho Cucamonga's requirements.
Q
EXHIBIT C
Compensation for Ilorthtoan Phase
IV
I. COMPACTION TESTING
s
A.
SAMPLING
'
1. SOILS TECHNICIAN 16
HR
41.00
656.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER FIELS 2
NR
60.00
120.00
3. PRE JOB MEETING 4
NR
10.00
280.O0
SUBTOTAL
$1056.00
s
B.
LABORATORY TESTING
I. MAXIMUM DENISTY 2
EA
60.00
120.00
i
SUBTOTAL
$120.00
C.
ENGINEERING REVIEW AND REPORT PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1
IIR
70.00
70.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE I
MR
60.00
60.00
3. SECRETARIAL 1
HR
24.00
24.00
A
'!
:UBTOT;.
$154.00
�5
TOT1L
$1330.00
II. LABORATORY
7ES7S - ASPHALT
i
„
A.
SAMPLING
,•
1. TECNICIAN 2
HR
41.00
82.00
l
p
SUBTOTAL
$82.00
B.
LABORATORY TESTING
1. ASPHALT STABILOMETRHVEEN 2
EA
125.00
250.00
2. EXTRACTION- PERCENT
ASPHALT 6 GRADATION 2
3. STAFF ENGINEER LABORATORY 1
EA
NR
100.00
200.00
60.00
60.00
SU3TOTAL
SS10.O0
C.
ENGINEERING REVIEW ANd REPORT PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1
2. STAFF
HR
70.00
70.00
'.+
ENGINEER OFFICE 1
HR
60.00
60.00
}.
3. SECRETARIAL 1
HR
24.00
24.00
SUBTOTAL
$154.00
TOTAL
$746.00
.•
GRAND TOTAL
52076.D0
-•
�y
EXHIBIT C
Compensation for Turner
Avenue Improvement Project
I. COMPACTION TESTING
A.
SAMPLING
1. SOILS TECHHICIAH
12
HR
41.00
492.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER FIELS
1
HR
60.00
60.00
3. PRE JOB MEETING
4
HR
70.00
280.00
SUBTOTAL
$832.00
B.
LABORATORY TESTING
I. MAXIMUM DENISTY
2
EA
60.00
120.00
SUBTOTAL
$120 00
C.
ENGINEERING REVIEW AND REPORT
PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
1
HR
70.00
70.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE
1
HR
60.00
60.00
3. SECRETARIAL
1
HR
24 00
24.00
SUBTOTAL
$154.00
TOTAL
$1106.00
11. LABORATORY
TESTS - ASPHALT
A.
SAMPLING
1. TECNICIAN
2
HR
41.00
82.00
SUBTOTAL
$82.00
B.
LABORATORY TESTING
1. ASPHALT STABILOMETRHVEEM
2
EA
125.00
250.00
2. EXTRACTION- PERCENT
ASPHALT d GRADATION
EA
100.00
200.00
3. STAFF ENGINEr? LABORATORY
HR
60.00
60.00
SUBTOTAL
$510.00
C.
ENGINEERING REVIEW AND REPORT
PREPAUTI011
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
1
HR
70.00
70.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE
1
HR
60.00
60.00
3. SFCRETARIAL
1
1•R
24.00
24.00
SUBTL'iAL
$154.00
TO 11
$746.00
S GRAND TOTAL
$1852.00; k,
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES
9614 Tune A"m • ROnChO O=MONQ CQW0"V0 91730 • (714) 999.1751
March 20, 1986
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
:engineering Division
P.O. Bo. 807
P.ancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 -0807
Attentions Mike Long
Subject: Proposal for Soil Compaction and
Materials Testing Services
Turner Ave. improvements
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.
Gentlement
In response to your request of March 5, 1986, we propose
to provide professional compaction and materials testing
services for the subject project. We propose that charges
for these services be on an hourly or teat rate basia in
accordance with the attached Pee Schedule. it is estimated
that the total charges will be $2,100.00. The estimated
charges are based on a scope of work as indicated on the
attached Estimate -Work Sheet, which is made a part of this
proposal.
Our professional services will include:
(1) Compaction testing of offeite utility trench
backfill and offsite street improvements. Services will
consist of performing in place density tests (compaction
tests), water content teats, and maximum density - optimum
moisture tests at locations and a frequency selected by a
representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.. Observation
of compaction methods used by the contractor is not included
in the scope of our work. A written report summarizing the
results of all tests performed will be prepared upon
completion of the work. The report will not be a certificate,
or warranty, of the compaction of the materials tested.
(2) Materials testing of asphaltic pavement. Services
will include Rveem stabilometer, sieve analysis and
FOIN]AMOM lMOe91MM0 T5 nmlo
A
extraction tests of asphaltic pavement. Tests will be
performed an materials sampled at random locations and At
frequencies based on the City of Rancho Cucamonga e
requirements.
This estimate is based on information given to Richard
Mills Associates by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and may vary
due to circumstances that may develop during the course of
the work. If a change in the scope of work becomes
necessary due to unforeseen conditions, which will increase
the charges, we will obtain your written authorization before
proceeding. Invoices for our services will be rendered upon
completion of the work and are duo and payable upon
rresentation. Should the duration of the job exceed one
month, monthly invoices will be presented for services
performed.
Richard Mills Associates does not guarantee the
Performance of the tested materials by performing these
services.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal.
We look forward to working with you on this projtct. If the
terms indicated in our offer are acceptable, we can begin our
work upon receipt of your notice of acceptance. If you have
any questions regarding this proposal please contact the
undersigned Project Manager.
Authorized By:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:
Titles
Date:
Attachments: Estimate Work Sheet
Pee Schedule
r- •
Very Truly Yours,
HILLS ASSOCIATES
A�.0
ndra, P.E.
Manager
E. Duane Lyon, P.E.
President
RICNARD MILLS
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES
ESTIMATE -WORK SHEEP
Proposal To: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Job Description: Turner Ave. Improvements, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.
Type of Service: Compaction and Materials Testing Services
I COMPACTION TESTING
A. SAMPLING
1. SOILS TECHNICIAN
16
ER
41.00
655.00
2. STAFF ENGIW 3 FIELD
2
ER
60.00
120.00
3. PRE JOB MEFP1r"io
4
RR
70.00
280.00
SUBTOTAL
$3056.00
B. LABORATORY TESTING
1. MAXIMUM DENSITY
2
EA
60.00
1.0.00
SUBTOTAL
$x20.00
C. LNGINEERIN3 REVIEW AND REPORT PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
I
ER
70.00
70.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE
1
RR
60.00
60.00
3. SECRETARIAL
1
BE
21.00
24.00
SUBTOTAL
$151.00
TOTAL
$1330.00
{'
,
RFCNARL MILLS
7
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES
ESTIMATE -WORX SHEET
Proposal To: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Job Dcscriptions Turner Ava. Improvements, Ran•:ho Cucamonga, Ca.
Type of Services Compaction and Materials Testing Sorvices
II LABORATORY TESTS - ASPHALT
A. SAMPLING
1. TECHNICIAN
2
fiR
41.00
82.00
SUBTOTAL
$82.00
B. LABORATORY TESTING
1. ASPHALT STABILOMETR-
HVvpu
2. EXTRACTION - PERCENT
2
Et
125.00
250.00
ASPHALT 6 GRADATION
2
EA
100.00
200.00
3. STAFF ENGINEER LABORATORY
1
HR
60.00
60.00
SUBTOTAL
$510.00
C. ENGINEFRING REVIEW AND PEPORT
PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
1
RR
70.00
70.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE
1
MR
60.00
60.00
3. SECRETARIAL
1
BR
24.00
24.00
SUBTOTAL
$154.00
TOTAL
$746.00
GRAND TOTAL
$2076.00 -
Y� RK34ARD p -- .LS 11SSM
r"
n'
SCHEDULE OF PEES
AUGUST 1, 1985
I LABORATORY TESTING
SOILS
TEST
—'
ONIT COST
Consolidation
Expansion Index (UBC Standard 29 -2)
5 70.00
X0.00
Direct Shear
Atterberg Limits
R -Value
55.00
Sand Equivalent
175.00
Mechanical Sieve Analysis
35.00
Hydrometer Analysis
52.00
Maxiuum Density - Optimum Moisture
40.00
Specific Gravity
60.00
Lab Moisture Determinations
40.00
Unconfined Compression Test
8.00
Lab Density Determinations (Drive Tube)
50.00
18.00
California Bearing atio (CO
Agricultural Suitability Sets of Engineers Method) 330.00
Corrosivity
70.00
Sodium Sulfate
35.00
15.00
CONCRETE, MORTAR
GROUT, BLOCx:i
TEST
--
UNIT COST
Concrete Cylinder Compression Tests
S 15.00
Hold Cylinders (Not Tested)
Cylinder Molds - 6" x 12" (No Charge if Tested)
Splitting Tensile Tests
5.00
1.50
insulating Concrete Cylinders - Compression Tests
25.00
15.00
Insulating Concrete Cylinders - Constant Weight
Gunite
15.00
Compression Tests
15.00
Concrete Flexural Strength
Unit weight of cylinders
40.00
Concrete Modulus of Elasticity
15.00
Compression tests on cores - 8" maximum diameter
35.00
15.00
RICPARO MILLS ASSOC)AT&7
RICEARD HILLS ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCHEDULE OF PEES
AUGUST 1, 1985
CONCRETE, MORTAR,
GROUT H ELOCRS
(cont ued
TEST
UNIT COST
Mix Debigna- Complete (Includes Analysis of Aggregates) Quote
Mix Design. - Calculations Only
100.00
Mix Deign - Lightweight
Quote
Trial Batch in Laboratory
Quote
Concrete Shrinkage Test - (Set of 31
165.00
Coring - 7•, 40 and 6- in Diameter
Quote
Block Ctuapression Test
35.00
Block, 24 hr. Absorption (Min. Reg. of 5)
50.00
Block, Foibture Content
15.00
Block, Lineal Shrinkage - Rapid Method
40.00
Block, Conformance to ASTM C90 (set of 3)
275.00
Hricx, Compression
15.00
Brick, 24 hr. Absorption
15.00
Brick, 5 hr. Eoll
15.00
Brick, Modulus of Rupture
15.00
Mortar Compression Test- (20 x 4• Cylinder)
15.00
:•rout Compression Test - (3• x V Pria:,)
15,00
Masonry Cores, Compression, 8• Max. Di. -:Otter
15.00
Masonry Cores, Shear, 8- Max. Diamater
30.00
T -nsile Test - C.M.A. Method
30.00
Trimming of Test Specimens
15.00
STRUCTURAL STREL
TEST
UNIT COST
Tension S 18.00
Head Test 18.00
Machining Coupons for Structural - Tensile and Bend 25.00
REINFORCING STEEL
Tension - No. 11 or eaaller 18.00
Tension - No. 14 25.00
Sension - No. 18 35.00
Bend Test 18.00
` R104ARD MILLS
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCUEDULE OF PEES
AUGUST 1, 1985
AGGREGATE
TEST UNIT COST
Absorption
5 35.00
Cleaness Value - Fine or Coarse
35.00
Decantation - No. 200
17.50
Deleterious Substances Determination
56.00
Durability Test - Fine or Coarse
50.00
Fineness Modulus
ri0.00
Flat and Elongated Pieces - (Per Size Fraction)
20.00
Fractured Faces - (Per Size Fraction)
20.00
Light Weight Particles
20.00
Los Angeles Rattler
60.00
Moisture Content
8.00
Organic Impurities
35.00
Percent Clay in Sands by Hydrometer
35.00
Percent Shale
35.00
Potential Reactivity - Chemical Method
100.00
Sand Equiv.lent
30.00
Sieve Analysis - Fine or Coarse
52.00
Sieve Analysis - Pit Run
52.00
Soft Particles
15.00
Soundness of Sodium Sulfate
125.00
Specific Gravity - Fine or Coarse
40.00
Weight per Cubic Foot
35.00
ASPHALT
TEST UNIT COST
Coring
5 Quote
Mix Design (Marshall or Hveem)
Quote
Pavement Evaluation
Quote
Deflection Study (Benklemen Beam)
Quote
Film Stripping
35.00
Rc Factor
35.70
Rf Factor
55.00
Moisture, Vapor Susceptibility
125.00
Extraction - Percent Asphalt
70.00
Extraction - Percent Asphalt and Gradation
100.00
Stability Tests (Hveem) Set of 3
12',00
Bulk Specific Gravity (Compacted Mix)
30.00
P104ARD MILLS
RICHARD KILLS ASSOCIATES,
SCHEDULE OF PEES
AUGUST 1, 1985
INSPECTOR - TECHNICIAN
Special Inspector - Asphalt Paving Laydown
Special Inspector - Asphalt Plant
Special Inspector - Caissons
Special Inspector - Concrete Hatch Plant
Special Inspector - Concrete Placement
Special Inspector - Concrete Pre - Stress
Special Inspector - Gunite Placement
Special Inspector - Hi Tensile Bolts
Special Inspector - Masonry
Special Inspector - Piling
Special Inspector - Reinforcing Steel
Special Inspector - Structural Steel Fabrication
Special Inspector - Welding (Ultrasonic)
Special Inspector - Melding (Viauul)
Anchors - Pull Tests
Coring (IDC1L.2en 1 Technician)
Pickup and Del .cry of Concrete Test Cylinders
Sampling
Soils Technician, Field
Soils Technician, Lab
Swiss Concrete Ha— Testing
Draftsman
Staff Engineer
Principal Civil Engineer
Staff Engineer Geologist
Principal Engineering Geologist
Secretarial
f
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATE.-
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCHEDULE OF PEES
AUGUST 1, 1985
MISCELLANEOUS RATES
SERVICE RATE
Overtime - Over 8 hours S 8.00/hour
Subsistence - Per Diem 35.00 /day
Travel Time - Hourly 41.00/hour
Mobile Laboratory and Testing Equipment 200.00 /week
Backhoe 55.00/bour
Drill R13 (Hollow Stm Auger, Bucker Auger) 115.00/hour
• These overtime rates are to be added to the standard hourly
rate for the appropriat personnel charges.
Our laboratory complies with the requirements for laboratory
facilities detailed in ASTM E329 and is inspected biannually by the
Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory of the National Bureau of
Standards. All tests are performed under the supervision of a
Registered Civil Engineer.
/ RICWU30 MILLS
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES
90241wnw AV • Rm o C"Mango Caldom 91130 • (711) 500.1771
March 20, 1986
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
Engineering Division
P.O. Box 007
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 -0807
Attention: Mike Long
Subject: droposal for Soil Compaction and
Materials Testing Services
North Town Phase IV Improvements
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.
Gentlemen,
In response to your request of March 5, 1986, we propose
to provide professional compaction and materials testing
services for the subject project. wa propose that charges
for these services be on an hourly or test rate basic in
accordance with the attached Pee Schedule. It is estimated
that the total charges will be $1,850.00. The estimated
charges are based on a scope of work as indicated on the
attached Estimate -Work Sheet, which is made a part of this
proposal.
Our professional services will include:
(1) Compaction testing of offaite utility trench
backfill and offaite street improvements. Services wil3
consist of performing in place density rests (compaction
tests), water content testa, and maximum density - options
moisture testa at locations and a frequency selected by a
representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.. Observation
Of compaction methods used by the contractor is not included
in the scope of our work. A written report summarizing the,
results completion oflthe tests ork.pThe oreport will bnot be a certificate,
or warranty, of the compaction of the materials tested.
(2) Materials testing of asphaltic pavement. Services
will include Rv3em stabilometer, sieve analysis and
extraction tests of asphaltic pavement. Tests will bs
aaosr 7aJ1W ' 'E'L HOW
performed on materials sampled at random locations and at
frequencies based on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's
requiremonts.
This estimate is based on information given to Richard
Mills Associates by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and may vary
due to circumstances that may develop during tho course of
the work. If a change in the scope of work becomes
necessary due to unforeseen conditions, which will increase
the charges, we will obtain your written authorization before
proceeding. Invoices for our services will be rendered upon
completion of the work and are due and pal-able upon
presentatlon. Should the duration of the job exceed one
month, monthly invoices will be presented for services
performed.
Richard Mills Associates does not guarantee the
Performance of the tested materials by performing these
services.
Thank yJu for the opportunity to submit this proposal.
We look forward to working with you on this project. If the
terms indicated in our offer are acceptable, we can begin our
work upon receipt of your notice of acceptance. If you have
any questions regarding this proposal please contact the
undersigned Project Manager.
Authorized By:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:
Title:
Date:
Attachments: Estimate Work Sheee
Pee Schedule
/l
Very Truly ]ours,
ASSOCIATES
It U /
P. E.
E. Duane Lyon, P.E.
President
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES'
RICHARD HILLS ASSOCIATES
ES^aIMATF. -HOAR SHEET
Proposal Toe CStY of Rancho Cucamonga
Job Description: North Town Phase IV Improvements,
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.
TYPe of Service: Compaction and Materials Testing Services
I COMPACTION TESTING
A. SAMPLING
1. SOILS TECHNICIAN
2. STAFF ENGINEER PIELD
3. PRE JOB MEETING
12 HR
41.00
1 HR
60.00
4 HR
70.00
SUBTOTAL
B. LABORATORY TESTING
1. MAXIMUM DENSITY 2 EA
SL iTOTAL
C. ENGINEERING REVIEW AND REPORT PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER ? HR
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE 1 HR
3. SECRETAPIAL 1 RR
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
70
60.00
70.00
60.00
24.00
492.00
60.00
280.00
$832.00
120.00
9120.00
70.00
60.00
24.00
$154.00
$1106.00
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES
ESTIMATE -WORK SHEET
Proposal To, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Job Descriptions North Town Phase IV Improvements,
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.
Type of Services Compaction and Materials Testing Services
ITEM. 4 ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
II LABORATORY TESTS - ASPHALT
A. SAMPLING
1. TECHNICIAN 2 HR 41.00 82.00
SUBTOTAL $82.30
B. LABORATORY TESTING
1.
ASPHALT STABILOMETR-
HVEEM
2
EA
2.
EXTRACTION- PERCENT
ASPHALT : GRADATION
2
EA
3.
STAFF ENGINEER LABORATORY
1
RR
SUBTOTAL
C. ENGINEERING REVIEW 9 n REPORT
PREPARATION
1.
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
1
HR
2.
STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE
1
HR
3.
SECRETARIAL
I
HR
SUBTOTAL.
TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
7/
125.00 250.00
100.00 200.00
60.00 60.00
$510.00
70.00 70.00
60.00 60.00
24.00 24.00
$154.00
$746.00
$1852.00
RIC"PD MILLS ASSOCIATES
SCHEDULE OF PEES
AUGUST 1, 1985
I LABORATORY TESTING
SOILS
TEST
--
U1JIT COST
Consolidation
S 70.00
Expansion Index (UBC Standard 29 -2)
70.00
Direct Shear
Atterberg Limits
80.00
R -Value
55.00
Sand Equivalent
175.00
Mechanical Sieve Analysis
30.00
Hydrometer Analysis
52.00
Maximum Density
y - Optimum Moisture
0.00
60.00
Specific Gravity
Lab Moisture Determinations
40.00
Unconfined Compression Test
8.00
50.00
Lab Density Determinations (Drive Tube)
18.00
California Bearing Ratio (Corps of Engineers Method)
Agricultural Suitability Set
330.00
Corrosivity
70.00
Sodium Sulfate
35.00
15.00
CONCRETE, MORTAR
GROOT. BLOCKS
TEST
--
UNIT COST
Concrete Cylinder Compression Tests
$ 15.00
Hold Cylinders (Not Tested)
Cylinder Holds - 6' x 120 (No Charge if Tested)
5.00
1.50
Splitting Tensile Teats
Insulating Concrete Cylinders - Compression Testa
25.00
15.00
Insulating Concrete Cylinders - Constant Weight
Gunito
15.00
Compression Tests
Concrete Flexural Strength
15.00
Unit weight of cylinders
40.00
Concrete Modulus of Elasticity
15.00
Compression tests on cores - 8• maximum diameter
35.00
15.00
RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES
PICOARD MILLS ASSOCIATE.4, INC.
SCHEDULE OF PEES
AUGU3T 1, 1985
CONCRETE, MORTAR.
GROUT BLOCKS
continued
TEST WIT COST
Mix Deigns- Complete (Includes Analysis of Aggregates) Quote
Mix Design - Calculations Only
100.00
Mix Design - Lightweight
Quote
Trial Batch in Laboratory
Quote
Concrete Shrinkage Teat - (Set of 3)
165.00
Coring - 20, 40 and 6' in Diameter
Quote
Blw -k Compression Test
35.00
Block, 24 hr. Absorption (Min. Reg. of 5)
50.00
Block, Moisture Content
15.00
Block, Lineal Shrinkage - Rzpid Method
40.00
Block, Conformance to ASTM C90 (set of 3)
275.00
Brick, Compression
15.00
Brick, 24 hr. Absorption
15.00
Brick, 5 hr. Soil
15.00
Brick, Mcduius of Rupture
15.00
Mortar Compression Teat - (20 x 4' Cylinder)
15.00
Grout Compression Test - (3' x 60 Prism;
15.00
Masonry Cores, Compression, 80 Max. Diameter
15.00
Masonry Cores, Shear, 8• Max. Diameter
30.00
Tensile Teat - C.H.A. Method
30.00
Trimming of Test Specimens
15.00
STRUCTURAL STEEL
TEST
UNIT COST
Tension 8 16.00
Bend Test 18.00
Machining Coupons for Structural - Tensile and Send 25.00
REINFORCING STEEL
Tension - No. 11 or smaller 18.00
Tension - No. 14 25.00
Tension - No. 18 35.00
Bend Test 16.00
73
RKMAnD MILLS ASSOLaAlPS
RICHARD ?ILLS ASSOCIATES, .RC.
SCHEDULE OF PEES
AUGUST 1, 1985
ACGRMATL
TEST
URIT COST
Absorption
5 35.00
Cleaness Value - Pine or Coarse
quote
Decantation - :o. 200
35.00
17.50
Deleterious Substances Determination
Quote
Q Q
Durability Test - Pine or Coarse
50.00
Fineness Modulas
S0.00
Plat and Elongated Pieces - (Per Size Fraction)
50.00
20.00
Fractured Paces - (Per Size Fraction)
20.00
Light Weight Particles
100.00
Los Angeles Rattler
2 0.00
20.00
Moisture Content
8.00
Organic Impurities
35.00
Percent CIBY in Sands by Hydrometer
35.00
Percent Shale
35.00
Potential Reactivity - Chemical Method
100.00
Sand Equivalent
30.00
Sieve Analysis - Fine or Coarse
52.00
Sieve Analysis - Pit Ran
Soft Particles
52.00
Soundness Of Sodiv Sulfate
15.00
125.00
Specific Gravity - Pine or Coarse
30.00
Weight per Cubic Foot
35.00
ASPEALT
TEST
DRIP COSY
Coring
Mix Desion (Marshall or Hveem)
S Quote
Pavement Evaluation
quote
Deflection Study (Benklemen Hearn)
Quote
Film Stripping
Quote
Q Q
Ec Factor
EL Factor
35.00
Moisture, Vapor Susceptibility
55.00
125.00
Extraction - Percent Asphalt
70.00
Extraction - Percent Asphalt and Gradation
100.00
Stability Tests (Uveem) Set Qf 3
125.00
Balk Spa -ific Gravity (Compacted Mix)
30.00
7 / PX34 -V D MU.S ASSOOATES
RICHARD HILLS ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCHEDULE OF PEES
AUGUST 1, 1985
II PERSONAL SERVICES
INSPECTOR - TEC`iNICIAH
SERVLCE
HOURLY RATE
Special
Inspector
- Asphalt Paving Laydewn
S 41.00
Special
Inspector
- Asphalt Plant
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Caisso.:J
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Concrete Batch Plant
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Concrete Placement
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Concrete Pre - Stress
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Gunite Placement
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Hi Tensile Bolts
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Masonry
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Piling
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Reinforcing Steel
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Structural Steel Fabrication
41.00
Special
Inspector
- Welding (Ultrasonic)
45.00
Special
Inspector
- Welding (Visual)
41.00
Anchors
- Pull Tests
40.00
Coring (Includes
1
Technician)
60.00
Pickup and Delivery
of Concrete Teat Cylinders
41.00
Sampling
Soils Technician,
Field
41.00
41.00
Soils Technician,
Lab
41.00
Swiss Concrete Hemmer Testing
41.00
ENGINEERING - OFFICE
PERSONNEL HOURLY RATE
Draftsman S 41.00
Staff Engineer 0.00
Principal Civil Engineer 6 60.00
Staff Engineer Geologist 60.00
Principal Engineering Geologist 70.00
Secretarial 24.00
75 RIrWARD MILLS
RICHARD -MXL:S ASSOCIATES. INC.
=SCHEDULE OY'EEES
.;AUGUST 11 1985
MISCELLANEOUS RATES
SERVICE RATE
-.Overtime -.Over 8 hours 5 8.00/hour
= Subsistence --per-Diem 35.00 /day
^,TraVal-Tima - Hourly 41.00/hour
- *Mobile I.sboratory- and Tes•,iug Equipment 200.00 /week
asnekhoe 55.00/hour
=Drill Rig (Ho11ow.Stem Auger, Bucker Auger) 115.00/hour
�• These overtime rates are to be added to the standard hourly
rate for the appropriate personnel charges.
Our laboratory complies with the requirements for laboratory
-facilities detailed in ASTM E329 and is inspected biannually by the
&ement and Concrete .Reference Laboratory of the National Bureau of
Standards. All tests are performed under the supervision of a
aegistered Civil Engineer.
m
%� R1CRARD MILLS
];Vi :,0D alV56Wr h2;s/ G
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE April 2, 1986
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Michael 0. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Neste, Brudin &
Stone, Inc. for the perfo.*mance of professional services with
respect to construction management, inspection and staking for
North Town - Phase IV and Turner Avenue Improvement Projects for
the amount of $32,000.00 to be funded from HUD and Gas Tax Funds
In conjunction with the subject projects, consulting services are required for
inspection and surveying. Neste, Brudin & Stone has submitted a combined
proposal of $29,096.00 for services necessary to cover subject projects.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Counril accept the proposal from Neste, Brudin &
Stone, execute the Professional Services Agreements, and authorize the Finance
Director to expend $32,000.00 (combined proposals of $29,096.00 plus $2,904.00
contingencies) for said services to be funded from HUD and Gas Tax Funds.
Respectfully submitt d,
LBH:H :sr X14
7 7
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this
��day
Of 1g , between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and Neste. Brudfn h
Stone (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT').
A. Recitals.
(t) CITY has heretofore issued its Request fo— Proposal
Pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to
construction management. Inspection and statin, for North Town - Phase IV
and Turner Avenue Improvement Projects ('Project* hereafter).
(il) CONSULTANT has now submitted Its proposal for the
performance of such services.
(III) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional
services ..c- essary to render advice and assistance to CITY, City Council and
staff in the completelva if Prrject.
(Iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such
services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter
defined.
NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as
follows:
B. Agreement,
1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise
requires:
-I-
(a) Project: Construction Management, Inspection and Staking
described in Exhibit "A" Scope of Services hereto Including, but not limited
to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the
presentation, bot., --al and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports
and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work _essions,
Public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the
project as outlined in the Scope of Services.
(b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to
be porformed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project.
(c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all
phr;es u` the project, including any and all procedures, development plans,
COPS. surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations
and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project
acceptance is set forth in Exhibit 00" Project Schedule attached hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the
project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State and
CITY statues, regulations, ordinance; and guidelines, all to the reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply originals of all maps,
surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in
Exhibit "A" to CIT' within the time specified In Project Scheduled, Exh +bit
"B ". Copies of tha documents shall be in such numbers as are required by
Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments
_2
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions
to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised
documents in such form and to the quantities determined necessary by CITY.
The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section B2.(b) may be extended upon
a written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTAtIT's sole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of
CONSULTANT. be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. in the
event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT hereby
warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services
required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT the sum outline in Exhibit W
for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover
the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees,
Including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to
CONSULTANT. ?ayment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with
the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C'.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in
accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis and
such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are
received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed In Exhibit •C• either with
respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no
-3- c�
a
event, however, will said invoices exceeg 95; of individual task totals
described In Exhibits 'A' and 'C'.
(:) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be
required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable
hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all
supplement technical documents, as described here'. acceptable in form and
content to CITY. i final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after
Presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services. Payments for additional services
requested, in wrfttng, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as
set forth in Exhibit W hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in
accordance with the fee schedule at forth in Exhibit 'C'. Charges for
additional services shall be Invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by
CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY.
4 CITY agrees to erOyIde to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit 'A'
hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other
information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to
complete the project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from CITY
files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information
from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be
CONSULTANT'S responsibility to make all Init4a) contact with respect to the
gathering of such Information.
-4 1& /
5. Ownership Of All documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, map!, models, photographs and reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY
and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT. Such documents and
other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire.
Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at
the sito intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications
by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written
consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY
agrees to holy harmless and indemnify the COISULTA14T against all damages,
claims and losses including defense costs ar sing out of any such alteration
or revision, 0r use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or
authorized agents.
S. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon
the giving of a written 'Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the
event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at
CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "0", on a pro_
rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the
date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than
r
the maximum specified in paragraph ] a
( ). above. CONSULTANT shalt provide to
CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models,
1n
yy, photographs and reports, whether In draft or final form, prepared by
,
CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this
A9r..tment except for cause.
7. Notices and Designated Representatives. Any and all
notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties
hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7 The below named
individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the
performan;e by tte parties under this Agreement:
John K _ ^ens *ra. Principal Engineer, Neste Brud'n • Stone LMonte Prescher.
Public *ark, Sn ineer. City of Rancho Cucamonga
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall
be deemed to hove been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after
deposit thereof In the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly
addresser as set forth above.
8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under
this Agreement until it has obtained all Insurance required hereunder in a
company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any
subcontractor to commence work on o subcontract until all insurance required
of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all tines during the term of this Agreement the following policies
of Insurance:
':R13
(a) Worker's Compensa to�insuranee: Before beginning
work. CONSULTANT
shall furnish to
CITY a certificate of insurance as oroof
that it has taken
out full workers'
compensaton insurance for all persons whom
t
it may employ directly
or through
subcontractors in carrying out the work
`i
specified herein,
in accordance with
the laws of the State of California.
':R13
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his
employees. CONSULTANT prior to co=encing work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certification as follows:
'I am aware or the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code
which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers'
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
Of that Code, and I will comply with such orovisions before cotmencing the
performance of the work of this Agreement'.
(b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the
term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in fail force and effect, for the mutual
benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, ,-.prehens!se, broad form, general public
liability and automobile incuran,a agair,t cldims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTAIIT's activities,
providing protection of at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00)
for bodily Injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or
occurrence and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (5500,000.00) for
property damage.
(cj Errors and Omtssto_ ns: CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies
of insurance concerning errors and omissions ('malpractice') providing
protection of at least One Million Dollars (11,000,000-00) for errors and
omissions (*malpractice*) with respect to loss arising from actions of
CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY.
(d) Genera_ 1 I_ nsurance pegulrements: All insurance
required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in
•7_<
responsible insurance Companies licensed to do business in the State of
California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as
additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the
effect that (1) the Insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and
CITY's elected otficials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies
are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by
CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially Changes except after
thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT
shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of
them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its
own account insurance not required under this Agreement.
9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall Cafeef, indemnify and
save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or
property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal Costs and
attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or
willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this
Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the
maximum extent permitted by law.
10. Asslanment): No assignor -nt of this Agreement or of any
part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or
in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that
C0113ULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contactors
under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be
_8.9S
i
employees of clTT.
12. Governing Law: This Agreeant shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
13. Attorney's Fear In the event any legal procetdiag is
Instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing
Party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees
and Costs from the opposing party in an arount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
14. Entire Agrenent: This Agreement supersedes any and all
other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect
to the subJect setter herein. Each party to this Agreement actnowledyes that
no representation by any Party which is not cobodied b_rein nor any other
agree=nt, sUtement, or Prmise Out contained in this Agreeoent shall be
valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only
If it is in writing signed by all parties.
III wITMESS *U.E.OF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above.
CDMSOLTAMT
v �
CITY OF RMCHO CIICAMORGA
70-5-1-3-mm—ems. Mayor
ATTEST:
Bever y A. Aotbe et, sty C ert
Date: 4ZLI
Date:
Approved as to fora:
ty ttmrney
t
-9- rL 1
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF UM
Construction Management
- Pre - Construction Confere=e
- Pay Estimates
- Contract Change Orders
- Labor Compliance Enforcement
- Final Report
- As -Built D— Brings
Inspection
- Full -Time Inspection and Doweotation of Yrok
- Enforcement of Traffic Control Requirements
- Before and After Photographs
`IXFIIBIT_B
,&WwAW%,DCK ork .-will= VfoU .Pw•the =course of project construction.
71swb
EXHIBIT C
COMPENSATION
Compensation is proposed on
an
hourly
basis per
attached rate schedule.
Estimated costs, assuming a
six (6) week concurrant construction period for
both projects, is as follows:
IV
CONSTRUCTION STAKING (2 -Man
Construction Management
TASK
ESTIMATED
Construction Manager
40
Mrs. @
$65.00
$2,600
- Office Engineer
12
Mrs. @
51.50
618
Administrative Secretary
16
Hrs. @
34.00
544
' Drafter
16
Hrs. @
43.00
688
Mileage
1,000.00
Catch Basin stk.
2
500
Total Construction Management $4,950
Inspection
Senior Inspector (30 days) 240 Hrs. @ $50.00 512.000
Mileage 800
Totoal Estimated Fee $17,750
CONSTRUCTION SURVEY PROPOSAL
CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
NORTRTOWN -PHASE
IV
CONSTRUCTION STAKING (2 -Man
Survey Crew)
TASK
ESTIMATED
RATE OER
ESTIMATED
STREET (1 SET)
HOURS
HOUR
COST
Eighth Curb Stk.(25')
5
$125.00
$625.00
Catch Basin Stk.
2 1/2
125.00
312.50
CMP
1 112
125.CO
187.50
Belmont Curb Stk.(25')
8
125.00
1,000.00
Catch Basin stk.
2
125.00
250.00
Retaining Curb Stk. 2
125.00
250.00
Acacia Curb Stk.(25')
8
125.00
11000.00
Header 5 A.C.
Berm Stk.
2
125.00
250.00
Centerline Control d Reset
8
125.00
1,000.00
Survey Supervision
6
58.00
348.00
Survey Research
4
50.00
200.00
TOTAL. ESTIMATED COST FOR NORTH TOWN -PHASE
IV PROJECT:
$5.423.00
86 0--
i
..
Exhibit C (coat.)
CONSTRUCTION SURVEY PROPOSAL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TURNER AVENUE
CONSTRUCTION STAKING (2 -Nan Survey Crew)
TASK ESTIMATED
RATE PER
ESTIMATHEO
STREET (1 SET)
HOURS
HOUR
COST
Turner Curb Stk.
8
$125.00
$1.000.00
E.P. Stk.
4
125.00
500.00
Ret. Nall Stk.
3
125.00
375.00
Catch Basin
2
125.00
250.013,
21' RCP
2
125.00
250.00
Feron Curb Stk.(B'CF)
2
125.00
250.00
Retaining Curb Stk.
2
125.00
250.00
Main Curb Stk.
4
125.00
5001.00
Sewer Stk.(25')
(Mainline 8 Laterals)
6
125.90
750.LYJ .
Centerline Survey Control
2
125.00
250.00
Centerline Control S Reset
8
125.CO
1.000.00
Survey Supervision
6
58.00
343.00
Survey Research
4
50.0
200.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR TURNER
AVENUE PROJECT:
SS.lQ3.00
E `l
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE
INCORPORATED
rn .w•. -. .rnas • W" •n coro .
February 25, 1986
Lloyd B. Hubbs
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 C Baseline Road
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL
NORTH TOWN-PHASE IV AND
TDRA'ER AVENUE PROTECTS
Engineers • Planners
cu.'.. . v,,I a.e...o.e
Over the past several weeks we have discussed providing Construrtion
Management Services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
At our February 19th meeting in your office a proposal was requested
for the above referenced projects.
Neste, Brudin b Stone Incorporated will provide these services on
an hourly basis in accordance with the attached "Schedule of Hourly
Billing Pates% It is understood that these are federal aid pro-
jects regoirin• special attention regarding wage rates, Disadvan-
taged and Women's Business Enterprises, and federal labor standards.
SCOPE OF WORK
Construction Management
• Pre- Construction Conference
• Pay Estimates
• Contract change Orders
• Labor Compliance Enforcement
o Final Report
• As -Built Drawings
Inspection
• Full -Time Inspection and Documentation of Work
• Enforcement of Traffic Control Requirements
• Before and After Photographs
SAN DIEGO . CAN @[AWARDING • N(yET
82
m
Lloyd B. Hobbs
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Construction Management
Proposal
February 25, 1586
Page 2
Soils Testing and Plant Inspection
O By Others
Construction Staking
o Either by Others or by NBS on an hourly basis as
negotiated at a later date
COMPENSATION
Compensation is proposed on
an ho•irly basis per attached
rata
schedule. Estimated costs,
assuming a
six (6) week concurrent
construction period for both protects,
is as follows:
Construction Management
Construction Manager
40 Hrs.
@ $65.00 $
2,600.
Office Engineer
12 Hrs.
@ 51.50
610.
Administrative Secretary
16 Hrs.
@ 34.00
544.
Drafter
16 Hrs.
@ 43.00
688.
Mileage
500.
Total Construction Management
Inspection
Senior Inspector (30 days)
Mileage
Total Inspection
$ 4,950.
240 Hrs. @ $50.00 $ 12,000.
800.
$ 12,800.
Total Estimated Fee
I1
EtnLa
$ 17,750.
1
Llovd B. Hubbs
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Construction Management
Proposal
February 25, 1986
Page 3
QUALIFICATIONS
Neste, Brudin s Stone Incorporated is providing Construction
Management services from our Corona office on a variety of
Projects throughout Southern California.
These include HUD funded projects such as North Town -Phase IV
and Turner Avenue; Assessment District projects; Caltrars
funded projects for freeway related utility relocations; Fed-
eral Aid Urban projects; and Inspection services for the U.S.
Navy at China Lake Naval Weapons Center.
A list of current projects and references will be furnished
upon request.
The scope of work, and hours are estimated from the best infor-
mation available at this time. After receipt of the contractors
schedule these numbers can be adjusted to fit actual contract
time and desired work coverage.
[ SI
M
NESTEI BRUDIN & STONE Engineers Planners
INCORPORATED
a
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
Effective August 1, 1985
OFFICE
FNGWEERING
Spacul Conw6ant
E.pm Wdneu
512.500
Pn nnpal Censuham
12500
Pmpct Dwmw
9000
Semen Pnncgd Engweer
6900
Pnncryal Engueer
69 OD
AmuannPnrcgal Engine°
65 W
Sent
6000
Engineer
5000
Gm;ogm
5150
Af err Ergram
5150
Amwa Eng,neer
4750
PLANNING
4200
Pnwc
Awmam
Afnfbm Pnncpal P11I1nR
6500
Samar Planner
60 00
Planner
5800
Amw Plannrt
5150
Afvfum Planner
4950
DESIGN RAF�iNG
a2 OD
D K
ms Ikn4
Sanar
Davgr.r
49 e0
Srmor halter
4750
Matter
4300
Dohntm
4200
E.T mprfearwy Aide
7400
2450
FIELD-
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMEM
Pra,,cqW EnS'neer
Senor ReWm Eeng,naer
65 00
Sanwa P,qm Reprefenu rve
58 68 00
Reudant Er�nm
OD
R(rytct Repuunuthe
51.50
5350
� Impectec+Reprnmumv
�pK
2 75. DuM Salary
SURVEYING
2 75 a Dima Sal"
Pnnepal Surveyor
Awfum Pnrcpd Surveyor
6500
SwyhhEEaugmem
SSi,
Tavel Tme— Wan N Mass d 63 hqua a keM perdayl
5588000 0
282 c Dveer Salary
141 a Dut salary
d
SERVICES AND EXPENSES:
Computer Caneal Pracmrg Una (CPU)
Conwi Tme par Haw
15C /Sd
econ
My nn
150 /100 srm
Computrt A,ulyft
2500
Rrgbmmer
65 00
Techmcun
4750
Rnearcher Procefor
4200
Eaacutrvr end AdmmfuN,ve Seerrmry
7400
Data Enby
pa 00
Se u,,Cln4
24.50
In hmw Reproducuon
2cost
Subwence
284/MJe
Other E.par us — bwludug O:hrr, Conmeans
Cost
and Purchesel Services through Sutcvnpactf
Cod ♦ 309
W �..wr...i.a.wr. +...w.+ n... W.....re......hn rr,..... a..... s.r +.r+r.n....
M ,IF `fh'L1 rHIR(�.eY.eblwA �aar�n ,.wryati YOM W Y brMTIw�.MrFwrws
'� 9D
CONSTRUCTIbri SURVEY PFOPOSAL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.YONGA
NORTH TOWN -PHASE IV
CONSTRUCTION STARING (2 -Han Survey Crew)
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR NORTH TOWN -PHASE IV PROJECT: $5,423.00
TASK
ESTIMATED RATE PER
ESTIMATED
STREET
(1 SET)
HOURS
HOUR
COST
Eighth
Curb Stk (251)
5
$125.00
$ 625.00
Catch Basin Stk.
2y
12S 00
312.50
CXP
1y
125.00
187.50
Belmont
Curb Stk (251)
8
125.00
11000.00
Catch isin Stk.
2
125 00
2E0.00
Retaining Curb Stk.
2
125 00
250.00
Acacia
Curb Stk.(251)
8
125 00
31000 00
Reader 6 A C.
Berm Stk.
2
125 00
250.00
Centerline
Control S Reset
8
125.00
11000.00
Survey
S•.pervision
6
58 00
348 00
Survey
Research
4
50.00
200.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR NORTH TOWN -PHASE IV PROJECT: $5,423.00
CONSTRUCTION SURVEY PROPOSAL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.'lO:7GA
TURNER AVENUI
Ct95TRUCTZON STAKZ'.YG (2 -Nan Su -^Vev Crew)
ST22^ (lTS T) ESTIMATED
RATE PER
HOUR
ESTIMATED
COST
Turner Curb Stk,
E P. Stk.
' Rec. Wall Stk,
Catch Basin
' 21" RCP
8
3
2
$125.00
125 00
12500
$1,000.00
500.00
375.00
250.00
250.00
Feron Curb Stk.(8 "CF)
Retaining Curb Stk
2
2
125.00
125 00
250.00
250.00
Main Curb Stk.
Sewer Stk.(25')
4
125.00
500.00
(Mainline 6 Laterals`
6
125.00
750.00
Centerline Survu_V Control
2
12S 00
250.00
Canterline Control S Reset
8
125.00
1,000.00
Survey Supervision
6
58.00
340.00
Survey Research
4
50.00
200.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR TURNER
AVENUE PROJECT:
$5,923.00
9a
DATE:
T0:
FROW:
BY:
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT`
April 2, 1966
City Council and City Manager
Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer
Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval to award Residential Street Rehabilitation 1985.86 Phase I
Project Contract to I.P.S. Services Incorporated, the lowest,
responsible bidder
Per previous Council action, bids have bren solicited and received for the
subject project which consists of street repair and replace patching, skin
patching, crack sealing, and slurry sealing.
The bid documents have been reviewed by staff and the apparent lowest,
responsible bidder is I.P.S. Services Incorporated for the amount of
$38,718.20. The engineer's estimate is $60,600.00 (see attached bid
summary). The subject project 15 to be funded by SB 300.
It is rec000enoed that City Council accept ail bids as submitted and award the
Residential Street Rehabilitation 1995 -86 Phase I Project Contract to I.P.S.
Services Incorporated for the amount of $38,718.20
JLBH lly sudoitt d,
Attach ment
93
�
�
\j \��
����
k)
l - = -;
!
I� /?)
}
,ek;
_
(
-
i § §§ |(
{
;
kks�-
}����
$ i
\
�§§ {${
|§
�
�wks -
,
�_ ;� -_
\k �
�{
(
§(( §k�
. � :
kE
.
�
/. }
[�/
,
kj(kt�[`
'
'
{}
-
;� ; ;=�a-
�§(2(
-
�
; ;kk ="
��
/
|
�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
BATE: April 2, 1986
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval to award Korth side of Foothill Blvd. (China Alley)
Contract to DeArmond Construction, inwest, responsible bidder
Per previous Council action, bids have been solicited and received for the
subject project which consists of street Improvements and widening (A. C.
paving, curb 6 gutter, sidewalk, etc.) and underground conduit construction.
The bid documents have been reviewed by staff and the apparent lowest,
responsible bidder is DeArmond Construction for the amount of $13,647.90. The
engineer's estimate is 517.600.00 (see attached bid summary). The subject
project is to be funded by Developer's Surety ($16,070.00 an file) and Systems
Fees if necessary.
RECUR VIDAnON:
It is recommended that City Council accept all bids as submitted and awaM the
North side of Foothill Blvd. (China Alley) Project to DeArnond Construction
for the amount of $13,647.90.
Respe tfully ubmitt ,
LBN: sr
Attachment
9s
■
[
{2
�
.,- ■!�!�! |
El
k ; ;
. e �
F| §
t {/6 66 §k
5 ��.kkk�3s
; | ;
k dk §d §§dk}
; ||; ;k |� ; §|||
, 5�4 6 5k 6 .;
, 661. lr�e72=
..5.,..:
,�k�
/ � `
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Varian Vartanian, Associate Civil Engineer
. r
ran
SUBJECT: Approval of an Agreement between the Cities of Rancho Cucaaonga,
Upland, and Ontario for upsizing of a proposed storm drain system
on Grove Avenue
Attached for City Council approval is an agreement between the Cities of
Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, and Ontario for City contributions toward upsizing
of a storm drain system on Grove Avenue proPosed in conjunction with a housing
development in the City of Upland near the boundaries of the above cities.
Per the agreement, the City of Upland will cause the upgraded work to be done
by the developer of said housing project with the increased costs being
divided three ways and contributed by each of the Cities ;n to a sum of
$29,418.00 for each city.
The upsizing of the proposed storm drain system will address this City's
storm
relatedpr blemsi�xperienccccdnby the GCities vofuUpland and lOntario aduring imajor
storms. This upsizing will further negate substantial future duplication
work.
RECOMMCMDATIOM
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached agreement and
authorize the City's contribution of $29,418.00.
Respectfully submitted,
LBN:VYa4Y
Attachments
' J
nl/7
This is an agreement between City of Ontario,
hereinafter sometimes called, Ontario, The City of Upland,
hereinafter sometimes called, Upland, and The City of Rancho
Cucamonga, hereinafter sometimes called, Rancho, all of which are
municipal corporations duly incorporated in pursuance to the laws
of the State of California made this _day of , 1986
RECITALS
The developers of a multi — housing project in the City
of Upland known as Tract 11827 have heretofore submitted a design
for drainage structures commencing in the vicinity immediately
north of the Santa Fe railway tracks crossing Grove Avenue
southerly to the intersection of Grove and Eighth Street and vest
on the northerly side of Eighth Street approximately 1320 feet to
the storm drain channel. These drainage structures require the
removal and replacement of AC pavement, the construction of
thirty (30) inch pipelines, an outlet structure per San
Bernardino County Road Department specifications, the
construction of a manhole per the City of Ontario specifications,
and forty —two (42) inch steel casing across the railroad tracks,
construction of a type 8A -3a catch basin, twenty —four (241 inch
RCP, the placing of Rip Rap, relocation of a ten (10) inch water
main and some striping, all of which was estimated to cost
approximately 8129,720.00 in pursuance to the preliminary cost
estimate dated April 12, 1985 attached hereto as Exhibit 'A•.
-t -9e
It is deemed to be in the best Interests of the three
cities above named that the Grove and Eighth storm drain
structures set forth above be increased in size for the purpose
of draining nn' only Tract 11827 and its immediate environs, but
other territories tributary to the structure. The hydrology
studies indicate that appropriate size of drainage structures for
that area should b2 increased from thirty (30) inches to
forty -eight (48) inches, a.0 the steel casing should be increased
from forty -two inches to sixty (60) inches. A preliminary cost of
the upsizing of the storm drain is attached as Exhibit '8' dated
April 12, 1985 and totals $208,305.00.
The present plans and specifications for the final work
on the storm drain to be accomplished are on file with each of
the cities and are known as Storm Drain craving No. SU- 81 -15. It
has been agreed between the Cities that the cost of upgrading the
drainage structures to accommodate the increased flows up to the
sum of and not to exceed 088,254 00, which will be divided
three ways and contributed by each of the cities in the sum of
029,418.00 each, as shown by a differential calculation for
upgrading set forth as Exhibit 'C', attached hereto and by
reference ircorporated herein.
The City of Upland will cause the upgraded work to be
done by the subdivider as a part of the work being already
accomplished by the subdivider of Trac, 11827 and as an addition
thereto.
NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows$
- 2 - �q
I . The City of Upland will cause the storm drain wo.k
to be done under the terms and conditions of the agreement it now
Possesses for offsite improvements of Tritt 11827 to be upgraded
and constructed in pursuance to the plans and specifications
filed with each of the cities and designated above
2. This work of improvement shall be done in
conjunction with the storm drain work required to be done by the
developers of Tract 11827. At such time as the work has been
accomplished in pursuance to said plans and specifications
Ontario and Rancho will each contribute to Upland, the sum of
$29,618.00
2. The City of Upland agrees to conduct all
inspections that pertain to the storm drain structure Itself,
exclusive of pavement repair, to the end that the storm drain
project as contemplated complies with all the applicable building
and construction requirements of the jurisdictions in which the
storm drain is constructed and to rubmit the results of said
inspections upon request of either of the cities.
a. The City of Upland agrees to procure from the
subdivider who will be doing the work of improvement such
liability insurance in pursuance to its normal requirements for
the construction of offsite improvements requiring the contractor
to protect the work as it progresses and will accomplish the work
In a diligent manner.
S. It is understood that the subdivider of Tract 11827
Shall be the procuring cause of the construction of the upgraded
storm drains and that said subdivider and his contractor shall
have no relationship as agent or employee to any of the Cities.
It is further understood that this is an agreement calling for
the contribullon only of funds for the benefits derived and that
the Cities are not requiring the increased sizing of the storm
drain but requesting the increase as a work of improvement which
would be in the best interests of all the cities The
accomplishment of the work now would further negate substantial
duplication efforts.
G It is agreed that all the 48 -inch line which is set
forth In Storm Drain Drawing No SD -81 -1S consisting of the
18 -inch storm drain shall be maintained by the City of Upland in
a free and open condition during the life of the 48 -inch storm
drain. The City of Upland will maintain that portion of the
sto.m drain which lies in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
commencing approximately SO feet north of the north line of the
right -of -way as shown in the drawings; and the City of Upland
shall maintain that portion of the storm drain which lieu in the
' City of Ontario, commencing at the north right -of -way line of
said railway and continuing to and including the terminus of said
line at the flood control basin.
R
Each of the cities grants to the City of Upland such
rights of ingress and egress as may ne required to ma:ntain,
construct or reconstruct said storm drain during the time that
maintenance is required by the City of Upland.
- 4 - 161
w
7 This agreement, is binding upon the heirs,
successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
IN WT *NESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto executed
this agreement as of the year and date first above written
ATTEST;
CITY CLERK
ATTEST;
CITY CLERK
ATTEST;
CITY OF UPLAND
MAYOR
CITY OF ONTARIO
MAYOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
JEFFREY KING
MAYOR
6EVERL
APPR05D AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK
'
CTT��
�Si'
— 5 —
' Y /IV /UI t
EXHIBIT "A"
Tract 1182) PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
EXISTING DESIGN
UNIT YOTFC
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST COST
Remove and replace A.C. pavement
270
Ton
40.00
$lO,a8O.
30" RCP (1500 -D)
1294
LF
70.00
90,580.
Outlet Structure per SBCRd Oept.Stds.
1
EA
1,000.00
1,000.
Construct M H /2 per City of Ontario Stds
3
EA
2,000.00
61000.
42' steel casing ( 563" thick)
50
LF
275.00
13,750.
P.0 C. Collar
1
FA
9DO 00
900.
Construct Type "A -3" Catch Basin
1
EA
1,750.00
1,750.
24" RCP
13
LF
62.00
810.
Place rip rap
LS
1,000.
Relocate 10" water main
LS
1,750.
Striping
LS
1,500.
Cost of Construction from 7 +54 to 20+62 $129,720.
/a.3
4/12/85
City of Upland EXH181T "0"
Grove /8th St. - UPsizing Storm Drain .
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ITEM UNIT L
QUANTITY UNIT COST COST
Remove and replace A.L. pavement
48" RCP (1500 -0)
Outlet Structure per SBCRd Dept. Sidi.
Construct H.H i2 per City of Ontario Stds
60" steel casing (0.563° thick)
Junction Structure
Place rip rap
Relocate 10" water main
Striping
300
Ton
40.00
$12,000.
1294
LF
120.00
155,180.
1
EA
1,203 00
1,200.
3
EA
2,000.00
6,000.
50
LF
330.OQ
16,500.
1
EA
1,500.00
1,500.
LS
1;500.
LS
1,800.
LS
1,500.
Cost of Construction from 7+54 to 20+62
Now 20+62 to End
16" RCP (1500 -0) 25
21' RCP (1500 -0) 48
AC Remov,l and repair 3
A -2" Catch Basin 3
A -3" Catch Basin 1
(ax
Sub -total $'37,280.
LF
55.00
1,375.
LF
60.00
2,280.
Ton
40.00
120.
EA
1,750.00
5,250.
EA
2,000.00
2,000.
Sub -total
Grand Total
$11,025.
$208,305.
rY
1/24/66
EXHIBIT "C"
Tract 11827
A Differential Equation in the Upsizing of the Storm Drain.
ITEM COST
From 30' to 48" RCP SE2,763.
21' RCP 4,235.
Manhole 04
1.851.
Type A -2 Catch Basins
5,960.
Manhole /2
933
Outlet Structure
640.
62' Casing
9,350.
Overlay 1" x 12'
638.
Trench Patch
600,
Relocation of 8" Water Plain
1,284.
TOTAL $88.254.
$88,254 divided by 3 cities Q $29,418.
/0.5—
lG
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAD1vNGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council arJ City Manager
FR071: Lloyd Hum , City Engineer
SUbJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
Tract 9472 - located on Heather and Halstead
DEVELOPER: Boulevard Development
777 S_ Main Street, Suite 106
Orange, California 92668
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $68,000.00
The required road improvements have been installed and it is recommended that
Council accept said improvements, adopt the attached resolution authorizing
the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk
to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $68,000.00.
Parcel Map 4511 - located on Industrial Lane and Feron
DEVELOPER.: Sabastian Fflpi
1294 Quince Avenue
Upland, California 91786
Release:
Monumentation Bond $1,70D.00
The monuments for Parcel Map 4511 have been set and the Engineer has been
paid. It is recommended that Council authorize the release of the
Monumentation Bond in the amount of $1,700.00
Re,pectfuilv Submit ed,
/a6
tlEC0MMUS RO/OTEO n:
CM OF RANOO OPCOIOROA
P. 0. Sax 6dt
Ranry.0 Cucaata A. Calif"la 91710
IOC. KWUC1 PAIL TO:
CITY CLp%
CITY A RAOCO CLVUW.A
P. 0. boa 601
RV4ha Cucamtga, Ca ?,rota 91710
NOTICE OF COKLET76R
NOTICE IT HUM CI9ER TMT:
1. The undersigned IF a Often of m lattrast pr ntata 10 tlwl
hereinafter described Mal PWCAY, the eatve of WhiCh fatnest W Olatn
is:
TRACT 9172
2. The full am and ad&tss of the wdertlgned otanr It: CM OF
RARDO CDCVVSGA. WJ-C bau L!" Road. F. 0. !u 877. Rartln Cxwes".
Callforela 91770.
2 On the 2ud day of A9r11. 1996, then was atVitted m 116
hrelasfter described real property the wort of lmprvrestent set forth f0 L'
ntract documptts fpr:
TRACE 9172
/. The nix of elf original contractor for the work of improvement
as a 16016 was:
WAITAR) GEYTIO11"T
S. The "at wooerty rife a to Lein Is situated It the City Of
R&WjQ Cecneonga, Cwdy of Sm CQOardi^ Callferals, and Is dtl >lbed 0
follows:
LOCATED d HEATHER AND KU47M
CITY Of SAMM CeKUM%. a
sualclpwl contras /on. Ow
a�6ii 7 LOS~
RESOLUTION No. F(, --) s
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU11CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANOdCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 9472 AND AUTHORIZING ThE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Trect 9472 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the nark complete.
the City EnngineerR1sORautho authorized tolVign ndifile a NoticehifeCompletion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino• County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTS) this 2nd day of April, 1986.
AYES:
HOES:
ABSENT:
e rey ng, ayor
ATTEST:
very t ee, Yff y er
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do
foregoing uclmng,eaapproved, andadopte by the City Council th C'ty of Rancho Cucamonga,
regular (special, adJourned) meeting of said City Council held on the 2nd
day of 4pril, 1986
Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Beverly A. Tu—tFcTe—t-.-ZTtyM—erV
laS
e
01
CITY OF RMCHO CUQUIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd 9. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Service , Agreement with DAVE Systems to
prepare facilities needs study and evaluation of City Corporation
Yard
Attached for Council approval is an agreement with DAVE Systems to prepare a
needs analysis and feasibility study for the development or acquisition of a
new City Corporate Yard. The contract involves the analysis of a City program
now and in the future, development of site regalrements and detailed
defivitlui of major building and equipment requirements for the next five
years.
The agreement also includes provisions to analyze an existing site at 11155
Jersey Blvd. This site was recently on the market and appeared to bm. do
excellent potential site. Subsequent to preparation of the agreement, this
site was sold, if the sale proceeds, Task 3 of the contract would not be
authorized and the budget Is reduced from 59,738.00 to $7,975.00.
Sonsiderlp the large Increase to mainterance op2rations in thecoming year,
assitance in loating and developing a new Yard is vital.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council approve a Professional Services Agrewent with
DAVE Systems to prepare facility needs study and evaluation of a City
Corporation Yard. Contract shall not exceed 59,378.00 to be funded from the
Systems Development fund.
Respectfully submit d.
LBO;: ja
Attachment
/01
A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made rnd entered into this day
of 19 , between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY•) and DAVE Systems. Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT').
A. Recitals.
(1) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal
pertaining to the performance of prnfessional services with respect to the
preparation of Maintenance Facilities Evaluation
( "Pr•lect• hereafter).
01) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services.
(111) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional
services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning
Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such
services and is willing to oerform such professional services as hereinafter
defined.
NON, THEREFORE, It is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as
follows:
B. Agreement.
I. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise
requires:
3/5/86 -1- // v
r
7
3
(a) Prp eel; The preparation of Haintenance Facilities Evaluation
a
i
,A described in Exhibit "A" Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited
`t to, the preparation of maps, P . surve ys, reports, and documents, the
i
presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports
d"
-i and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions,
w
Public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the
a
project as outlined in the Scope of Services
4 (b) Services: Such profess tonal services as are necessary to
be performed by CONSULTANT in order to :onplete the project.
(c) Completion of Pro ect: The date of completion of all
phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans,
maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations
and attendance by rONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project
acceptance for construction is slit forth in Exhibit "B" Project Schedule
attached hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the
project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State and
CITY statues, regulations, ordfna,ices and guidelines, all to the reasonable
i
satisfaction of CITY.
J
`i (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys,
reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as
•documents ") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in
Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in Froject Schedule, Exhibit
.I
'Z
1
"8 ". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by
Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to ^. ONSULTANT comments
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions
to said documents as are deemed necessary. CiTY shall receive revised
documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY.
The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon
P written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULT/:NT's sole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of
CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the
event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby
warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services
requirel hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of 59.738 00
for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sma shall cover
the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees,
including the work of empi ,)yees, consultants and subcontractors to
CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with
the schedule set forth in Exhibit W.
(b) Payments to CONSULTAA' shall be made by CITY in
accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and
such invoices shall be paid, within a reasonable time after said invoices are
received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C" either with
respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no
-3- // s;
event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals
described in Exhibits W.
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be
required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable
hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all
supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and
content to CITY. Final payment shell be made not later than 60 days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services: Payments for additional services
requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as
set forth in Exhibit W hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in
accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit •C•. Charges for
of -0itional services shall be Invoiced on a monthly basis end shall be paid by
CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY.
4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit W
hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other
information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to
complete the project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from CITY
files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information
from other governmental agencies and /or private Parties. However, it shall be
CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the
gathering of such information.
-4- 113
5. 04nership of Documents: All documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY
and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and
other Identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire.
Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at
the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications
by the CITY, its staff or authoNred agent, without the specific written
consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY
agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages,
claims and losses Including defense costs arising out of any such alteration
or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or
authorized agents.
6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon
the giving of a written •Notice of Termination' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the
event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be conpensated at
CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit •B', on a pro -
rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the
date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than
the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to
CITY any and all dccwents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models,
photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by
CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this
Agreement except for cause.
7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all
notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties
hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named
individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the
performance by the parties under this Agreement: Nil Nnrnnng. Contract
AAninictratgr__DAVE Svstem[. 145n F. 17th [rrnri G.1 re inn [..,rte a..,
907_ Ranrhn Curhmnga. CA 01790
Any such otices, demards, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall
be deemed to have been received by the addressee fo -ty -eight (48) hours after
deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as set forth above.
B. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under
this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a
company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any
subcontractor to crmmence work on a subcontract until all insurance required
of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies
of insurance:
(a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: 8,ro.e beginning
work. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof
that it has taken out full workers' compensation Insurance for all persons
whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work
specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Cede
Section 3700, every employer shall secure the Payment of compensation to his
employees. CONSULTANT prior to commenc•ng work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certification as follows:
Of am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code
which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers'
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the
performance of the work of this Agreement•.
(b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the
term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual
benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public
liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities,
providing protection of at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000,00) for
bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence
and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000,00) for property damage.
(c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, A policy or policies
of insurance concerning errors and omissions (•malpractice•) providing
protection of at least Not Applicable for errors
and omissions (,malpractice*) with respect to loss arising from actions of
YCONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of city.
a
5, (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance
s
required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only to
-7 //6
responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of
California and pol%. s required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as
additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the
effect that (1) the Insurer, Insured and all subcontractors waive the right
of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees,
and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any
insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or
materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the Insurer to
CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such
Policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the
insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required
under this Agreement.
9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, Indemnify and
save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
employees, from all liability from loss, damage or Injury to persons or
property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and
attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or
willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this
Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the
maximum extent permitted by law.
10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part
or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in
part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
11. independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that
CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors
-8- %/7
under this Agreement and shall not be construed for a-,v purpose to be
employees of CITY.
12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall bt governed by and
construed In accordance with the laws of the State of California.
13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding 1s
instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing
party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees
and costs from the opposing party in an amunt determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all
other agreements, either oral or to writing, between the parties with respect
to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that
no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other
agreement, statement, or promise not contained to this Agreement shall be
valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only
if it is in writing signed by all parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above:
CONSULTANT - DAVE Systems, Inc.
Date:
CITY OF RANCHO CUU40NGA
Jeffrey King, Mayor Date:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authel—et7M—tyl er Approved as to form:
-g- //0
EY.HIBIT W
SCOPE OF SERVICES
MAINTENANCE FACILITIES EVALUATION
PURPOSE
It is the purpose of the proposed scope of services for the
consultant to conduct a preliminary investigation and evaluation
of tyre maintenance facility requirements for the City maintenance
program within the next five years and for the projected buildout
of the City. The investigation shall include a comparison of the
acquisition and renovation of an improved site located at
11155 Jersey Boulevard, with the acquisition of lands and phased
development of a new site. Said investigation shall include the
following detailed scope of services.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1: Data Collection
The consultant shall interview staff, and review current
and projected maintenance activities, needs, and programs,
including vehicle fleet maintenance. The consultant shall
further collect such other data as required to generally evaluate
land, off -site improvement, structures, and equipment
requirements to serve needs in the near future and at buildout of
the City.
TASK 2: Identification of Facilities Needs and Cost Estimates
Based an the collected data, the can ^ultant shall
identify and prepare cost estimates for the general land
requirements sufficient to contain the ultimate projected
maintenance responsibilities of the City; establish major
building and equipment requirements for the next five years, and
general structural requirements at buildout of the City.
It is understood that all facility requirements will be
general in nature and only adequate to the extent of existing
projections of maintenance needs provided by the City.
It is intended that facility identification and costing
shall be adequate to allow comparison with the alternative of
acquiring the proposed developed site at 11155 Jersey Boulevard.
/i5
y
M
TASK 3: Evaluation of Existing Developed Facility
The consultant shall review drawings and survey existing
facilities located at 11155 Jersey Boulevard to evaluate the
feasibility of meeting facility requirements identified in
Task 2. Said evaluation .hall include identification of facility
deficiencies and cost estimates to effect needed repairs and
alterations to allow the facility to meet the short- ana long -
ranje needs of the City. Specific items of cincern are as
follows:
1. Suitabilit3 of state of repair of fuel facilities.
r
2. Adequacy and location of hoists.
3. Cost of generalized repair and demolition of
unnecessary improvement.
0
! 4, identification of gross building code violation.
S. General modification required to effect iamediate
occupancy of facility.
6. Cost to spli+: electrical service to allow lease or
sale of 25,000- square -foot building.
' TASK 4: Report and Presem•ttion
t
w
e
•' Consultant shall c)cument the findings in a i net report
'• for presentation to the Ci.y Council. This report shall prasont
;p documentation of the analysis performed in Tasks 1, 2, and 3, and
present a recommendation on site acquisition or development. The
consultant shall further present results of his finding and be
prepared to answer questiors at executive sessions of the City
,. Council.
0
EXHIBIT "D•
SCHEDULE
Study and report for Task 1, 2 and 4 shall be completed for
„resentation to City Council within 14 calendar days. Task 3
shall begin only upon authorization cf the City Fngineer and
shall be completed within 14 calendar days of the n.tice to
proceed.
/01/
M
E%H'SIT C•
PAYNFNT
Payment shall be based on time and materials at the attached
rates, but shall not exceed 59,738.00 for all tasks and 57,975.00
for Task 3 +f authorized.
CITY OF FLA,`IC110 CUCAi,:ONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: 4pproval of Professional Sere ces Agreement with L. 0. King, Inc.
for the design of Baker -Arrow Storm Drain in Baker Avenue between
Foothill Blvd, and Arrow Route and in Arrow Route between Baker
Avenue and Cucamonga Creek channel and for Street Widening and
Reconstruction of Baker Avenue between Foothill Blvd. and 8th
Street and Arrow Route between Baker Avenue and the Cucamonga Creek
Channel
Attached for City Council approval 1s an agreement for consultant services
.0th L. O. King, Inc. for the tesi-ln of the above subject protect Said
services constructionlplans� ,dspecificationsan and engineer's Ceestimat the forewidening of
and pavement reconstruction at various locations on Baker Avenue between
Foothill Boulevard and northerly right -of -way of the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railway (ATSF) near 8th Street, and Arrow Route between Baker Avenue
and the Cucamonga Creek Channel; also Storm Drain Improvements between
Foothill Boulevard and the Cucamonga Creek Channel, generally in Baker Avenue
end Arrow Route, including a portir,n of storm drain between Foothill Boulevard
and the Southern Pacific Trans)ortation Coupany (SPTCo) railroad track
northerly of Tract 12895.
Contract amount is not to excead 575,500.00 plus a 10% contingency to be
funded by Systems Development. Said project is proposed as a redevelopment
project for improvements of low- and moderate - income neighborhoods. If and
when the Redevelopment Bond issue is complete, the design workings will be
rt,mbursed from the Redevelopment Agency.
/c�3
/-
CITY COUNCIL SfAfF REPORT
Approval of Professional Services Agreement with L. D. King
April 2, 1986
Page 2
oECONVOTION
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached agreement awarding
the design services for the above described project to L. 0. King, Inc. and
authorize funding from Systems Development funds in an amount not to exceed
$15,500.00 plus a 10% contingency and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
sign same.
LBH:LHar
Attachments
r
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day
of _, 19, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal
Corporation (her inafter referred to as 'CITY°) and L. 0. King, Inc
(hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT').
A. Recitals.
(i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal
pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the
preparation of design and calculations, construction plans, specifications and
engineer's estimate for widening of and pavement reconstruction and storm drain
imorovements in Bakar, Avenue and Arrow Route.
('Project° hereafter).
(ii) COIISULTA14T has nod submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services.
(iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional
sarvices necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning
Comnlssion, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such
services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter
defined.
NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as
follows:
B. Agreement.
1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise
requires:
7/31/85 -1- /c;)S
(a) Project: The preparation of design and calculations,
construction drawings, specifications, and engineer's estimate
described in Exhibit •A' Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited
to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the
presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports
and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions,
public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the
project as outlined in the Scope of Services.
(b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to
be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project.
(c) Completion of Protect: The date of completion of all
phases of the project, Including any and all procedures, development plans,
maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations
and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project
acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit '8° Project Schedule
attached hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the
project in accordance with Exhibit 'A and applicable with Federal, State and
CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys,
reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as
'documents`) including all supplemental technical documents, as described in
Exhibit •A• to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit
-2- % >b
"B ". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as ir- required by
Exhibit "A". CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSUL -MIT comments
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions
to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised
documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY.
-he time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon
a written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of
CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the
event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby
warrants that such persons shall he fully qualified to perform services
required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum ui $75.500.00
for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover
the cost of all staff time and all other 'erect and indirect costs or fees,
Including the work c` employees, consultants and subcontractors to
CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance w'.th
the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A".
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT she 1 be made by CITY in
accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and
such Invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are
received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C" either with
respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tacks. In no
-3- / \ ;
event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals
described in Exhibit "A ".
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be
required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95X of the maximum payable
hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all
supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and
content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services- payments for additional services
requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as
set forty in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursemant basis in
accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C". Charges for
additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by
CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY.
4, r.ITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT;
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit W
hereto.
(b) Photographically -eproducible copies of maps and other
information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to
complete the project.
(c) Such information as is geierally available from CITY
files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information
from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be
CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact wish r:spect to the
gathering of such information.
-4- IJ-8
5. Owrershio of Documents: All documents. data, studies,
surveys, drawings naps, models, photographs and reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY
and, upon pa)aent for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and
other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT.
COMILTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire.
Any use or reuse )f the plans and specifications except at
the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications
by the CITY, its staff or autho�i:ed agents without the specific written
consent of the CONSULTANT shall he at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY
agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all dmagas,
claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration
or revision, or us_ or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or
authorized agents.
6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon
the giving of a written •Notice of Termination• to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the
event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at
CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit 40', on a pro -
rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the
date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than
the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to
CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps. models,
photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by
-5-
CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may rot terminate this
Agreement except for cause.
7, aatices and Designated Heoresentatives: Any and all
notices, demands, Invoices and written communications between the parties
hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named
individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the
performance by the parties under this Agreement: D. H. hfavt, vice president
for and in behalf of the CONSULTANT and Mane W. Frandsen Senior Civil Engineer
for and in behalf of the CITY.
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall
be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after
deposit thereof •, the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as set forth atove.
S. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under
this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a
Company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any
subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required
of the subco•itractor has been obtained. COPWLTA.YT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the folloving policies
of insurance:
(a) Worker's Comoensaton Insurance: Before beginning
work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of irsurdnee as proof
that it has taken out full workers' compensaton insurance for all persons whom
it may employ directly or through subcontractors to carrying out the work
specified herein, in accordance with the laws Of the State of California.
-6- f ? 6
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Coda
Section 3700, every emr; layer shall secure the paywent of compensation to his
employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certification as follows:
'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3200 of the Labor Code
which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers'
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the
performance of the work of this Agreement".
(b) public Liability and property Damage: Thr,>..g'nout the
term of this Agreement, at CJNSULTAIR's sale cost and expense. CONSULTANT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual
benefit of CITY an'l COIISULTArIT, comprehensive, broad form, general public
liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULIAIir's activities,
providing protection of at least One Million Dollars (Sl,00nv"00,00) for
bodily injury or death to any one peL son or tar any one accident or o.%Sience
and at, least Coe Million Dollars (SI,0D0,000,00) for property damage,
(c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies
of insurance concerning errors and omissions (•malpractice•) providing
protection of at least 5250.000.00 for errors
and omissions ('malpractice*) with respect to logs arising from actions of
CONSULfDVT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY.
(d) Gerwral Insurance Regutrerents: All insurance
required by exprese Provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in
'7" /.3/
o9
responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of
California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as
additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the
i effect that (1) the Insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and
CITY's elected officials, offkars, erployees. and agents; (2) the policies
are primary and noncontributing with any in.urance that may be carried by
CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or a:aterlally changed except after
thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT
shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of
them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its
own account Insurance not required under this Agreement.
9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, Indemnify and
save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
i
employees, from all liability from loss, damage or Injury to persons or
property, includi the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and
e
attorneys' fees, to any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or
willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this
t Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequcntial damages, to the
.� maximum extent permitted by law.
.{ 10. Assignment): No assignment of this Agreement or of any
part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or
in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that
CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors
is
under this Agreement aid shall not be construed for any purpose to be
-8 /,3 ca
• Mloyeas of CITY.
E
12. Gov-
== ILAN. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed to accordance with thb laws of the State of CAlffornia,
13. Attornev�s peas,
rnstltuted to entorca an la The at ' any Al Proceeding is
Y torn or provision of the Agreement, the Prevailing
Party i° said legal Proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys$
and costs fr�n the oppostn9 Party fees
reasonable. in an L=uot datarmined by the Court to be
14, Fnttre eeement: Thft Agreement super -edes
Other allreraants, either oral any and all
or fn vrittng, between the parties vfth respect
to the subject matter herein. Etch party to this Agreement acknowledges
no representation by any party vhfch that
agreement, fs not cmbodlad herein nor any other
valid and binnding, ding.ant, or prnmfse not contained in this 49retment shall b2
Any nodfffcatlon df this Agreement shall be effective only
if it is in writing signed by all parties.
IN WITNESS WH14EOF, the Parties hereto have executed
as o1 the day and year first met f6rth above: this Agreement
CONSULTAW - L. 0. King, Inc.
ys tv,�e YfeJ�dah�i"
CITY OF NAKW LTICANCNGA
e rey ng. Yar
ATTEST:
ever
Y ae, tyLer
Date:
onto•
At to foray Y o ay
-9- 1,33
aM
Exhibit A
March 7, 1986
SCOPE OF SERVICES
To provide Professional Engineering and Surveying Services for the Preparation
of Construction Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate for Widening of
and Pavement Reconstruction a• various locations on Baker Avenue between
Foot "111 Boulevard and northerly right -ef -way of the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railway (ATSF) near 8th Street, approximately 4,600 LF, and Arrow
Route between Baker Avenue and the Cucamonga Creek Channel, approximately
2.10; LF, also Storm Dralr Improvements between Foothill Boulevard and the
Cucamonga Creek Channel, generally In Baker Avenue and Arrow Route, Including
a port'on of storm drain between Foothill Boulevard and the Southern Pacific
Transportation Company (SPTCo) railroad track northerly of Tract 12895
Task 1. Survey Services to Include.
a. Centerllne control and stationing.
b. Topography frcm right -of -way to right -of -way.
c. Cross -se ^dons at 50' minimum intervals, Including grade breaks and Join
locations.
d. Field notes to be delivered to the City for rerjrd.
Task 2. Utility Research and Coordination per Utility Notification Proce-
dure, to include
a. Research and obtain file copy of utility maps within the project limits.
b. Plotting of such facilities In plan view on the construction drawings.
c. Preparing and transmitting plans with utility notices (blank notice
forms to be provided by the City to all utilities).
d. Monitoring response to such notice-, making recommendations for mitiga-
ting conflicts.
e. Attending cnardinat!on meetings, If required, regarding adjustments and
relocations.
Task 3. FriUlneering Eva!Jatfon and Design 'or storm drain design and pavement
repla wvrt ardA r resurfacing, Including soils Investigation
A hollow stem, auger -type drill rig will be utilized to perform both storm
drain and pavema:nt investigations simultaneously.
13 �1
��U
"arch 7. 1986
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Page two
With respcct to storm drain construction, three (3) borings will be placed
along Baker Avenue and three (3) borings aloul Arrou RZute. These borings
will be taken to a maxtmmc depth N 15 feet and will be omtinwasly logged.
Subsurface conditions that could affect the proposed corn drab construction
will be noted. In addition. sail samples taken from the erploratery boring
will be returned to the laboratory for further testing.
With respect to strut c -t uction, smples mdll also be taken representa-
tive of the prcWle stmt subgrat•. soils. In Manion, after removal of
the auger fie the borimj. she thickness of we asphalt concr_te and the
presence of base material, if any, will be mud. tb actual asphalt concrete
cares will be recovered. Bulk samples of soils will also be taken fret the
adjacent shoulder areas.
Since only six (6) borings will be dire for the stern Crain construction, It
will be necessary to place three (3) additional shallow bcrags on Bake
Avenue below Arrow Pane to sample specifically for strtxturai section design
recr--aendations.
With regard to structural section design remmondations, a civil engineer
will visit the site and +eke rotes on the conlltion of the existing asphalt
concrete p,vesent. Areas requiring removal and/or overlay will be ca,^ped.
The R -value Ceterm:ttation will than be utilized to deve-Lop an aMrcprlate
street structural section. The strtxarral section Ctsign given will be for
new construction, and where practical, an overlay of the existing section.
In the laboratory, samples r. -ture3 will be vlsosvly classifW. The sass: :e
considered represeatative of the probable storm drain excavation will be si -
jected to sieve analysis and sand equivalent tests. The sacple of probable
subgrade soils writ also be subject to a sieve artaiysis and sand Wyalent
test. Direct shear tests will be run an the probable stun drain exciratiu^
In order that information on trench wail stability and staring can be devel-
oped. In addition, an R -value test will be performed on repriwj=.tve
subgrade soils In order that app.w. ate structural sect.od design veroccen-
dations can be nsde.
Upon ca¢pletion of the laboratory testing, criteria wi:l be d- -eloped for the
term drain construction. Including trance wall stability, sand equivalent,
!nieve analysis and shoring. Infuriation dxtxtxnitg expected difficulty with
mcavation will also be wade at that tie, including such thin,^s as graexd-
nater or rack.
/, xj
40
1 t°1 a
ii✓ `j1 A;
March 7. 1986
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Page two
With respect to storm drain constroce:Ion, three (3) borings will be placed
along Baker Avenue and three (3) bWngs along Arrow Route. These borings
will be taken to a maxima deoth of is fe:t and will be continuously logged.
Satsurface conditions that could affect the ,mropesed storm drair constr¢ctlon
will be noted. In addition, soil taople0 taken frog the exploratory boring
will be raturnd to the laboratory for further testlnT.
rive ofst�hetprobabeeftreettsutgrade saaiills. In additions. after rermo a! tof
the avgar from the boring. the thickness of the asphalt concrete and the
Presence of base aaterial. If any, will be noted. no actual asphalt concrete
cores will be recovered. Bull; samples of !Of Is will also be taken from the
adjacent shoulder areas.
will so 1� estary torplace will
three 3) additional allow boorinpi construction,
Averut .low Arrow Route to sasple specifically for structural section design
recoaa,rxis tons.
with regard to structure: t sec -ion design recomendations, a civil engineer
wIII visit the site and alike rotes on the t _,4tfon of the existing asphalt
concrete pavement. Areas reQulring removal *Wor overlay will be sapped.
The R•value determination will
ttreo then be utilized to develop an appropriate
t structural ze:tian. The Structurai section design given will be for
new constr•rection, and where practical. an overlay of the existing section.
In the laboratory, samples rtturne,� will t. visually classified. The sample
considered representative of the pn%aale stare drain excavation will be sreb-
jecad to sieve analysis and semi epulvr.t• t tests. The sample of probable
test. Directsshear also N111�t run ane.reeeprobablesstorrm drain excavation
In order that Information on trench wall stability and shoring can be devel-
sultgradelRoiislin ordernt. at eappropriate will
struct ral Section design sctaitlne
dations can be made.
Upoa cuapletlon of tile labsratory testing, criteria will be deraloped for the
storm eve drain n is dad snaamrig!n[ folrnm3atlon�rwall st eii!ty,dsanffleeuivalenth
water or r will also bo made at that time, including such things as ground-
/.35"
0103
March 7, 1986
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Page four
c. Title Sheet showing
• title
• vicinity and location mappings and plan sheet Indnxing
• utility and drawing legends
• benchmark and basis of bearings
• construction quantities
• standard signature and title blocks
Task 7. Right -of -Nay Engineering
Prepare legal description for right -of -way acquisition on Baker Avenue, Arrow
Route and Fenthill Boulevard for approximately 41 separate Assessor's
Parcels. Recorded documents referenced In the title report will be reviewed
by the consultant and legal descriptions prepared from record data.
Task 8. Prepare and maintain design files for transmittal to the City at the
completion of the project design
Task 9. Prepare Oetailed Construction Quantity and Engineer's Cost Estimate
Task 10. Prepare Complete Contract Specifications using "boiler plate" speci-
fications provided by City, Including,
a. Boller Plate by City
• notice inviting bids
• Instruction to bidders
• contract proposal (by consultant)
• bidders information
• agreement
• bonds and Insurance forms
• general conditions
b. Special Pn vislorrs shall be prepared by the consultant.
Task 11. Attend Coordination Meetings with Staff for Design Review and
Project Coordination
Task 12. Attend Preconstruction Conference and Provide Design Coordination
during coa;tructlon
/ z?,2
9,ir71�r
March 7, 1986
COMPENSATION
Fees for Professional Engineering and Surveying Services for the SCOPE OF
SERVICES provided for herein are ,lsted below.
Estimated Cost
Task
1
$11,500
Task
2
1,500
Task
3
4,600
Task
4
500
Task
5
2,200
Task
6
45,100
Task
7
2,800
Task
8
0
Task
9
1,200
Task
10
3,600
Task
11
1,500
Task
12
11000
TOTAL
$75,500
The actual cost of each task may vary somewhat from that shown above, however,
the total not to exceed cost of all tasks Is a maximum cost to the project of
$75.500 for professional englnering services.
Authorization to proceed with the following work shall be se• forth In writing
by the City Engineer*
• Additional pavement cores and/or R -value tests not provided for under
Task 3 to evaluate the existing pavement
Estimated Cost • $1,000
Services to be provided by the City:
• Pothollna existing utilities
• Furnish preliminary title reports for right -of -way acquisition
• Printing of final plans and specifications for bidding and construction
purposes
• Advertising the project fcr construction bids
)39%
IJ � i). r4 C.
March 7, 1986
Tasks t and 2
Task 3
Tasks 5 and 11
Tasks 6, 8 and 9
Task 7
Task 4
Task 10
Exhibit 8
SCHEDULE
137
N
v
0
w
N
L
L
d
Y
9
6
Exhibit C
RATE SCHEDJLE
August. 1905
Hourly Rate
PrinciDal ............ ............................... ............ S 80 00
Project Manager .................... ...............................
67.00
Project Engineer ................... ...............................
60.00
Survey Coordinator ................. ...............................
60 00
Designer ........................... ...............................
60.00
Associate Engineer ................. ...............................
54.00
Senior Drafter /Calculator .......... ...............................
54.00
Drafter ............................ ...............................
40.00
Assistant Engineer ................. ...............................
45.00
Junior Engineer .................... ...............................
Engineering Aide ...............................
29.00
20.00
...................
Administrative Assistant ........... ...............................
25.00
Production Typist .................. ...............................
20.00
3 -Man Survey Crew .................. ...............................
142.00
2 -Mun Survey Crew .................. ...............................
115.00
Travel Time (when in excess of 8 hrs work time per day)
3 -Man Survey Crew .. ............................... ............
76.00
2 -Man Survey Crew ......................... ......... ...........
52.00
In -House Reproduction ............. ............................... Cost
Printing and Materials ........ ............................... .... Cost +15%
Express Ma!1 /Courier /Next Day Service .... ....................... Cost
Mileage ....... .................... ............................... 304 1mile
Special Consultant Services ................ ...................... Cost +15%
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2. 1986
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs. 'Gity Engineer
BY: Monte Presr:,er, Public Works Engir.•er
1977
SUBJECT: Approval of acceptance of Utica Storm Drain AD 82 -1 as complete and
authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion for the work
The Utica Storm Crain AD 82 -1 Project has been completed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council approve the
acceptance of the project, authorize the final payment and direct the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release
performance surety (S313,859.00) and retention ($32,514.57).
RECCMIENDATIDN
It is recommended that Council accept as complete the Carnelain Street
Beautification Improvement Project and pass the attached resolution
authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and release the
faithful performance bond and retention (35 days after filing Notice of
Completion) and authorize final payment.
4Respe tfully s bmit ,
LBH:ja
Attachment
w /f
RECORDING REWES1ED BY:
CITY Cy AMO10 CLICAIOISGA
P. 0. Boa BD7
Reacly Cutasongs, Califorels 91M
t0ON RECORM MAIL T0:
CITY CLEAR
CITY OF AMID p1LWAGA
P. 0. Bus B07
Rancho Cecawga, Catlforela 91770
WTICE OF CUFLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVE. 'NAT:
1. The unden'9ad Is a, finer of an Interest e1, estate t, the
1e lesfter described nil property. the eaten of which lutenist or a,let,
Is
UTICA STORM VRAIN AD 02.1
2. TM 'all am ad ddrefs of the cnderst9Md Omer Is: CITY OF
ARKIN) aIKAH A. 9720 -C Base Ow Rod. P. 0. Roo 007, Rands Oxasc, ga,
CallfoMle 91771.
7. 0e IN 2nd day Of April, TABS. there was taapigtd do the
hereinafter Also bed Mal property the cart of la mm,t set forth in the
contract docramU for:
UTICA STORE MAIN 92 -1
�. the es of the original contra. -tar hr the work of taproreetat
as a whale was:
UNITED M
S. The Mal property MPsnd to hares, If situated to the City of
Rancho Cucaenga. Comty of San 0aMardW. CallfoMle. and is destrlbd as
follows:
UTICA AYM2 AT FOURTH STREET
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMWA, a
euolclpAI MPM,tlon. 01041,
o s. y weir
/�
RESOLUTION Ho. ,t O - 8(O , -7 /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFQINIA. ACCEPTIM; THE PUBLIC IMPRMKM
FOR UTICA ST'O N DRAIN AD 82 -1 AMD AUTHORIZING THE FILING
if A NDTICE Of COMPLETION FOR THE YORK
YHERFILS, the construction of public fmprovements for Utica Storm
Drain AD 82_1 have been completed
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the
work
complete.
Not, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the wort is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardf� County.
PASSED, APPRDVED, and MOPTED this Znd day of April, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jef rey ng, yor
ATTEST:
ver Y A. et, ty
I. BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adapted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucam at
a regular (special, adjourn onga,
adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the 2nd
day of April, 1986.
Executed this * day of *, 19" at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Beverly et, ty Zlerr
//3
C= OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Rubbs, City Engineer
8T: Dave elevins, Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: Approval of acceptance of Alta Loma Storm Drairt (AO" 84-2)1 az
cceplete and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion for ttm=
work
The Alta Lama Storm Drain (AD 84-2) Protect has been completedi ton tore
satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council' apprvv.
the acceptance of the project, authorize the final payment and direct the City,
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County pecorder, and'reTeazg
performance surety ($1,928,190.00) and retention ($98,002.11).
REC@lIEIDATION
It 1s recommended that Council accept as complete the Carnelairt Street-
Beautification Improvement Project and pass the attached rLsollidair
authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and'release, then
faithful performance bond and retention (35 days efts- filing Notlua of
Completion) and authorize final payment.
Rely submit ,
LBH:j
Attachment
l' 5z
'J 1.E. Il..� }111.
TCrrl mr 9Amm CI M"m
Y. a. -ma W?
1mAoYecamons. California 917.10
.Y®1 PAIL T0:
2I7Y 1mt
ctn.a-uvm tI1CA1ml6A
a. n. ass Prn
�aecooYacamwga. 411 /mrnle 937]0
ROTICE 6 CCRLRIOe
'W= IS SUM SIM Tw:
1. TM amdtrstvrd It m caner of n Interest er estate In the
•hentnaftm dnCrtaed nal greperty, the wton of which Interest or estate
Is:
ALTA LM VOMI DWm (AD ")
2. The 1911 name and add, a of the mWrsigned caner Is: CRT or
"RA6CID =NDACA. 93'J' C But Lim Men. Y. 0. py 807. 1"d, cut qe.
tsiffarnla 91710.
]. an tM and day 07 Apr11. 1986. then was rnanleted on the
.hntnafter Oefcrlkad MI prc/ert7 the cork of tamrowesent set forth In the
rmatract dooneats tor:
ALTA Ll1A STWA MAIN (AD Md)
4. TPr name of the eri9laal camtra for the wort of Improvement
as aMdlewas:
DMA''D C. MISS 08: MM 19at6S AND SOBS
S. The na1 In me, y "ferred te hems Is Situated In LA. City of
Ko Casammpe. Canty of Sm M+unlm. California. a'M fa described 41
CMMR DRALM VVITIMM OF ALTA LOA CILUM.
A73ATID 1TRCCT Aim awxAOT vwRvyD" i CA
ROM= ATDM. RILS011 AYM AID RIILSIOE ATIIDC
It RACW LIICAPOWA
CITY CF RMID NCMMA. a
nAlclgal caq ratl". 0~
ate— u 1, Y near
/4/6—
RESOLUTION NO. YDi }B1F 8L - &0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR ALTA LONA STORM DRAIN (AD 84 -2) AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NGTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE STORK
Drain (AD 84-2) WHEREAS, ave been completed to the satisfacttiontoffthe Loma
and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
the City Engineer RIsORauthorized to resolved, andtfile aalloticehofeCompletiondwith
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jef fr ey ng, ayor
ATTEST:
every , t e e , ty er
California, do BEVERLY reby certify that CLERIX of the
Resolution Rancho
was hduly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the 2nd
day of April, 1986.
Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamorga, California.
ever t e e., ty e—rW
(i�
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMO \GA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1995
T0: City Council and City Manager
Mh": Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Lien Agreement between Lester A. Davies and Rebecca A.
Davies and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage
iacprovments at 6239 Archibald Avenue
The attached subject agreement between the City and Mr. and 1?s. Davies
provides for frontage improvements which include curbs, gutters, and drive
approach in return for a 10 -year lien on the Davies property at 6239 Archibald
Avenue.
Said street Improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's
Capital improvement Project for the recunstruction of Archibald Avenue from
Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street.
RECOMMCIRIATIDM:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the lien agreement between Lester and Rebecca Davies and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga in an amount not to exceed $1,050.00.
Respectfully submi
�77
LIEN AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this • day of . 1906
by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municlaal corporation
(hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and Lester A. Davies and Rebecca A. 03vies
husband and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referr• +d to as 'OWNER') for tl;e
installation of certain PW)Iie improvements including, but not limited to curbs.
gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along a portion of
Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
A. Recitals
(I) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently
contemplates the installation of, public improvements ah ng Lemon Avenue from
Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Av. me from lemon
to Banyan Street (the 'Lemon- Archibald Project` hereln+ft!r in this Agreement).
(ii) OVYER owns that certain real property, identifimd as San Bernardino
County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -21, which is located on Archibald Avenue,
which property is within the limits of the Lemon - Archibald Pro.'ect.
(tit) CITY is willing to include the street frontag,+ mprovements along
OWNER's property located on Archibald Avenue (the Davies Pcrt'on hereinafter)
within the Lemon - Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set
forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OMER as follows:
1. CITY shall lnclade the Davies Portion as a part of tie constru�:tion of
the Lemon - Archibald Project and shall cause all necessary public tmprovtments to
be installed in accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. The
•i-
lim+ts of said construction are more particularly described in Exhibit •8•
att,.ched hereto.
2. OWNER agrees to pay to CIT!, in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement, CITY'S actual costs incurred in constructing the Davies Portion. The
parties hereto agree that the costs of said construction is S lor-, n.ri7 as
shown in the Estimates of Construction attached hereto and iN:ntified as Exhibit
I.C.
3. Upon coayletion of the Leman- Archibald Projec'., an] the Davies Pnrtion
thereof, CITY shall Ceusa a Notice of Completion to be prepared and presented to
OWNER. Uoon presentation of said Notice of Complex ton, OIiNER agrees to pay the
full principal amount of jUN6p,,, n +on or before the 31st day of December,
1986. OWNER may, at OWNER's sole option, pay said amount cf 1_10 pn +in
ten (10) annual Installments to be due and payable on or before the 31st day of
December during each calendar year zomoencing with the year 1986. In the event
OWNER falls to timely make any payment specified herein, or in the event of sole
of the property, the entirety of any amount remaining shall become due and
payable to ('Tv. payments shill be made to CITY at the Rancho Cucanonga City
Hall, Attention: Administrat ve Services Director, or at such other address or
person as the CITY may designate In writing. OWNER and CITY agree that in the
event OWNER opts to pay the ab)ve- specified amount by annual installments, that
said annual Installments shall be due and payable without invoice by CITY or any
other notice to OWK:R.
4. CITY shall have and is hereby given a lien on OWNER's property (San
Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -21) to secure the fall
performance by OWNER of GWNFR's payment obligations set forth in paragraph 3,
;Not to exceed -2-
/y9
above. In the event that OWNER fails to timely fulfill the payment obligations
specified In p4ragraph 3, above, CITY may, alternatively, enforce and foreclose
the lien provided for or sue OWNER on OWNER's personal obligations hereunder ell
of which payment obligations shall be considered personal r lardless of whether
or not OWNER may have or shall have transferred all or any of MNER's interests
In said property, whether by operation of law or otherwise.
5. CITY's waiver of any breach by OWNER with respect t0 any payment
obligation set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any other such
breach
5. OWNER d,.tes to grant to CITY, its electeo officials, officers, agcats,
employees and contractors such rights of entry and /or tcporary co- struction
easements as are deemed tecessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the
..ompletion of the bavies Portion.
7 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of California.
8. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or
provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall
ue entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party In an
amount determined by the court to be reasonable.
9 This Agreement is ulnding upon and shall Insure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, wherever the context requires Or admits.
10. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whet'sr oral or
in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each
party to this Agn.ement acknowledges that no representation by any Tarty which
-3-
/Sd
is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not
contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this
Agr>ement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the
parties hereto.
IN WITNESS MiEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the
day and yea- first above written.
CITY PROPERTY OWNER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lester A. Davies
CALIFORNIA, a municipal Rt�acca A. Davies
corporation
By.
JEFFREY KING, MAYOR A
MA it n -A
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
-4-
15/
City Attorney
HRNNRf RHtffriftff NriftN NNHNffNRNfff ifSrfiHfNflftNNNRRHN1f iNf
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ss
On 19
me ,before
the un ers gne Notary Pu c, persona y appeare JEFFR Y K N an B VERL A.
AUTHELET personally known to me to be tht Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of
the CITY OF RAYCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to
me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said
municipal Corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation
executed it.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
Notary gnature
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOi ss
On this the I �' day,, of %i')2yCli y ��'.f'F• befnre
f• ..7177
,17 un�rs gne , otary u c ersona y appeare
(( persona y Known to ma
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) who a name(S) �W� subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowleged that J b. _ executed 1'..
WITNESS MY HAND AND 0�I_AL SEAL. ^
OFFICIAL SEAiNot i
JUDRH A ACOST t-1:0)xxIMau: -CA 04,, ary gnature
My e c x1Y 2a
«�
NOTE: WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, 1NE AME
�
SH
EDGE11M IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTNERIP ACy,"&EDGEEHT IS
-5-
/SC.)
I
.. .i.. -- ... ^
p IxWGU\1VI It -� 1 1
"IV., Yll.«
7
r.Jy t1dM l3YU``I �
1,, \ Al ofe JYn/Or SIC•11Tw 9 - (r
Y'3 \ 111 � pY! /a9Aalyd ✓ZLf'� "� �Vl
cD tt •Lt rrr 1 O - - -�. __ ���� ly m�
• h
ostroiv srJr9n/or �••
IGtI2 01
.� I • - ���M \. r Q� dV dvot9 +f jOp.SY1C
/S4p68 _ N - j- - - %3ad o,re//ndr aLr s.zr wr
t N -•.- -• �jl�A ax
q9 OYJrIJ N Jd /vl0l•.iIF ->
d!O 1rMJ '!JB DJ p'"O,I fBjJ!•r^�'
J I bd'VnYdr+C l>'A.)MJb - �-ii��
IB iaA d ITS �Y d>�JAOYJY
IF' p \ ] r/�•� 1p0l
_ 69•/ �ft h ! I� v I10
by �I � a` 1 �• � h .
ys✓Je�a< ndM lrsr.� �a i II Z �- —'rnaor, q� ?e-L'+ �� -.
�. a tmtfftc •>YJ/ -'�/ -�
xwa IN
f� I Z I I �nOLLO01 rli O/ I ♦yp 1 h 4
h � I`IlJ KNt10x Y�O
-
«Z 1
a�n � o \ F �Yy .•pl r� (4 soJ
n - \. � 3t TlWJdIlA•
OI
UtF —W
S;dJ /133NS 35r3N17%/71D'W \z�;
Q I II OO•nZ t11ff5 I / I 'h
y
f � s
c j=
C: b Iz
un
EXHBIT *r-"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
cycLrZ-z-.&=G DEPaRM —%r
PREUMINARY
COST ESZI.E
L.EbTEK 4. REBECCA DAVIFS
APN 201.25\ -Zl
1511
Date: 2JSA/Hf.
By: LE:L4
of iii
eo
RESOLUTION 110. YES"fM56R_ 94o - if /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANW
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIIIG A LIEN AGREEXW FRO{
LESTER AND REBECCA DAVIES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR PAD
CITY CLERX TO SIGN SAME.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in
conjunction with the Archibald Avenue Reconstruction Project.
WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach and pavement
located at 6239 Archibald Avenue, to be made part of the Archibald Avenue
Reconstruction Project.
WHEHEA'5. Lester and Rebecca Davies have submitted a Lien Agreement as
reimbursement to the City for said improvements.
MOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED br the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Lien Agreement, authorizes the
Mayor and the City Clerk to sign saes, and directs the City Clerk to record
same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and A9,A`TED this Znd day of April, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City CJeFF
rey K i ng, yor
/S5—
CITY OF RANCHO CU('AMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 7, 1986
TO: City Council and Pity Hanager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer
-MECT: Approval of Lien Agreement between Ray A. Jones and Nancy L. Joner
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage Improvements
at 9760 Lemon Avenue
The attached subject agreement between the City and Kr. and Nrs. Jones
provides for frontage improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalk, and
drive approaches in return for a 10 -year lien on the Jones' property fronting
Lemon Avenue.
Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's
Capital Improvement Project for the reconstruction of Leman Avenue from
Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue.
RECUOUCATION:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the Lien Agreement between Ray and Nancy Jones and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga In an amount not to exceed $3,100.00.
4Re/f r
r
LIEN AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered Into this day of 1986
by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation
(hereinafter referred to as 'CITY ") and Ray A. Jones and Nancy L. Jones husband
and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred +o as 'OWNER ") for the
installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs,
gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along a portion of
Lemon Avenue In the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
A. Recitals
(i) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently
contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Lemon Avenue from
Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue
to Banyan Street (the 'Lemon - Archibald Project" hereinafter in this Agreement).
(ii) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino
County Assussor's Parcel N.o. 211- 251 -55, which is located on Lemon Avenue, which
property is within the limits of the Lemon- Archibald Project.
(111) CITY is willing to include the street frontage improvements along
OWNER's property located on Lemon Avenue (the Jones Portion hereinafter) within
the Lawn-Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, It is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows:
1. CITY shall include the Jones Portion as a part of the construction of
the Lemon- Archibald Project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to
be installed in accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. The
limits of said construction are more particularly described in Exhibit "B"
4i CJ�
r;
attached hereto.
2. OWNER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement, CITY's actual costs incurred in constructing the Jones Portion. The
parties hereto agree that the costs of said construction is S =•1CjD nn- as
shown in the Estimates of Construction attached hereto and identified as Exhibit
3. Upon completion of the Lemon - Archibald Project, and the Jones Portion
the -eof, CITY shall cause a Notice of Completion to be prepared and presented to
OWNER. Upon presentation of said Notice of Completion, OWNER agrees to pay the
full principal amount of LIAM t� on ur before the 31st day of December,
1986. OWNER may. at OWNER's sole option, pay said amount of 1_51rX ,(2.Q in
ten (1G) annual installments to be due and payable on or before the 31st day of
December during each calendar year commencing with the year 1986. In the event
OWNER fails to timely mate any payment specified herein, or in the event of sale
of the property, the entirety of any amount remaining shall become due and
payable to CITY. Payments shall be made to CITY at the Rancho Cucamonga City
Nall, Attention: Administrative Services Director, Or at such other address or
person as the CITY may designate in writing. OWNER and CITY agree that in the
event OWNER opts to pay the above - specified amount by annual installments, that
said annual installments shall be due and payable without invoice by C17Y Or any
other notice to OWNER.
4. CITY shall have and is hereby given a lien on OWNER's property (San
Bernardiro County Assessor's Parcel No 201- 251 -55) to secure the full
performance by OWNER of OWNER's payment obligations set forth in paragraph 3.
above. In the event that OWNER fails to timely fulfill the pay'0ent obligations
ub
specified in paragraph 3, above, CITY may, alternatively, enforce and foreclose
the lien provided for or sue OWNER on OWNER's per-onal obligations hereunder all
of which payment obligations shall be considered perso-:al regardless of whether
or not OWNER may have or shall have transferred all or any of OWNER's interests
in said property, whether by operation of law or otherwise.
S. CITY's waiver of any breach by OWNER with respect to any payment
obligation set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any other such
breach.
6. OWNER agrees to grant to LITY, its elected offlcials, officers, agents,
employees and contractors such rights of entry and /or temporary construction
easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the
completion of the Jones Portion.
7. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of California.
8. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce dny term or
provision of this 4greement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall
be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an
amount determined by the court to be reasonable.
g. This Agreement is binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the
Parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits.
10. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or
in writing, between the pa!4ies with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each
party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which
�1
ki
Is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not
contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this
Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by ail of the
Parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the
day and year first above written.
CITY PROPERTY OWNER
CITY OF RANCHO CUi1U7 M
CALIFORNIA, a municipal
corporation
BY:
JEFFREY KING
tbyor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
Ray A. Jones
Nancy L. —Joys
p
C)
FORK:
City Attorney
ft ►tktf fiffftitlfftfltkff tfHiltfififHttfffttfti#tt # fiifttfltffiMft } tkRtlHrR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ss
on 19 .before
me
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared and BEVERLY A.
AUTHELET personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of
the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA)IONOA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to
me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said
municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation
executed it.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
Notary Signature
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ss
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO [��" GGfi//
On tbts she /7'� dip, of /�rv7cvl, - /OG, before
me, undersigned U 7" ft hr 3
t o Notaiy—Pu 6T c p YO ally appeare
v %AW PICA
jw personailY KnOWn to me
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) who ;e names) "e_ subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowleged that TMI, executed it.
WITNESS MY HAND AN_" 4L 5EAL.
OFFICIAL SEAL
JUDITH A ACDSTA
`t • ftor MR4 • G Oo9
w
$41 B m� pO octz,
NOTE: WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ABOVE
AaJIOWLEDGENEMT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATIDN/PARTNERAIIP ACKNOWLEOOEMENT IS
-- . (yok .
I
t
2
of
i
L•7
I
HOR /I : / "= 40' —
3 4 5
/4 E3.H1131T "B"
urnt� cF ccNS�ucrou
/4 3I
h �
' e� 3ro
cION E,
3 ( AI %V ZM-Z51`-;ti ^ b�j
2 AVENUE W
a
J
n
/'' .! z�7- / ::a�.:igj' .1c�X!'" •i " GSf'.T ,.i'" <'�•'.� t +' . - •,;;
a.-Jr ,•�? ,f `:Sc
,� _ •O � - "c `5:^
/0 I -W
VE UE" -i• "3'• �, � .. �� .� 2
V
�
G
O W
A
H
�
G
W
//
Ck%f
�O�r
S
'� ua
EXHIBIT °C'
Cri-Y OF RANC O CUCAMONGA
PREUMINARY
COS ZS- .=LI:z
RAY aNANCYJONES
APN 2D1.2.S1 M
/63 t-7)
Data: 2124/8•
!Y: L2M
?!'G
A
I quo I
E
I I
l z
I zoo I
I I
i» i
Ll
SO,`
RESOLUTION NO, tO02 =1'tTi O
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT FROM
RAY AND NANCY JONES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN SAME.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in
conjunction with the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project.
WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk and
pavement located at 9760 Lemon Avenue, to be made part of the Archibald Avenue
Reconstruction Project.
WHEREAS, Ray and Nancy Jones have submitted a Lien Agreement as
reimbursement to the City for said improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Lien Agreement, authorizes the
Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record
same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jeffrey ng, ayor
a
s
ATTEST:
t
r
f
r
very A. Aut a et, City Clerk
A- >
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council and City Manage -
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Assistant Ciell Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Lien Agreement M:tween Ricky P. Miller and Jeanna M.
Muter and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage
improvements at 9780 Lemon Avenue
The attached subject agreement between the City and Mr. and Mrs. Miller
provides for frontage improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalk, and
drive approaches in return for a 10 -year lien on the Miller's property
fronting Lemon Avenue.
Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's
Capital Improvement Project for the reconstructioi of Lemon Avenue from
Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue.
RECONVENDATION:
It is recocmendau ttiat City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the Lien Agreement between Ricky and Jeanna Miller and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga in an amount not to exceed $3,000.00.
��S
LIEN AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of _ 1986
by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation
(hereinafter referred to as •CITY•) and Ricky P. Miller and Jeanna M. Miller
husband and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as 6OWNER') for the
installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs,
gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along a portion of
Lemon Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
A. Recitals
(I) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently
contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Lemon Avenue from
Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue
to Banyan Street (the 'Lemon - Archibald Project' hereinafter in this Agreement).
(ii) OWNER owns that certain real property, Identified as San Bernardino
County A�,essor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -58, which 1s located on Lemon Avenue, which
property is within the limits of the Lemon - Archibald Project.
(iii) CITY Is willing to include the street frontage improvements along
OWNER's property located on Lemon Avenue (the Miller Portion hereinafter) within
the Lemon- Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, it Is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows;
1. CITY shall include the Miller Portion as a part of the construction of
the Lemon - Archibald Project and shall cause a`1 necessary public improvements to
be installed In accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. The
limits of said construction are more particularly described in Exhibit •B'
-1-
/ ko
attached hereto.
2. OWNER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement, CITY's actual costs incurred In constructing the Hiller Portion. The
A4
parties hereto agree that the costs of said eonstruction is S Arnn.ac�, as
shown in the Estimates of Construction attached hereto and Identified as Exhib'.
..c..
3. Upon completion of the Lemon - Archibald Project, and the Hiller Portion
thereof, CITY shall cause a Notice of Completion to be prepared and Presented to
OWNER. Upon presentation of said Notice of Completion, OWNER agrees to pay the
full principal amount of Sa=0,m or before the 31st day of ')ecemb ��
m
1936. OWNER may, at OWNER's sole rgtion, pay said amount of S in
ten (10) annual installments to be due and payable on or before the 31st day of
December during each calradar year commencing with the year 1986. In the event
OWNER fails to timely make any payment specified herein, or in the event of sale
of the property, the entirety of any amount remaining shall become due and
payable to CITY. Payments shall be made to CITY at the Rancho Cucamonga City
Hall, Attention: Administrative Services Director, or at such other address or
person as the CITY may designate in writing. OWNER and CITY agree that in the
event OWNER opts to pay the above - specified amount by annual installments, that
said annual installments shall be due and payable withc-' invoice by CITY or any
other notice to OWNER.
4. Clrf shall have and is hereby given a lien on OWNER RIs property (San
Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -53) to secure the full
performance by OWNER of OWNER's payment obligations set forth in paragraph 3,
above. In the event that OWNER fails to timely fulfill the payment obligations
; (%cA -AD 4EXCdiCI,
-2
1/2
specif'ed in paragraph 3, above, CITY may, alternatitely, enforce and foreclose
the lien provided for or sue OWNER on OWNER'S personal obli;ations hereunder all
of which payment obligations shall be considered personal regardless of whether
or not OWNER may have or shall have transferred all or any of VNER's interests
in said property, whether by operation of law or otherwise.
S. CITY's waiver of any breach by OWNER with respect to any payment
obligation set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any other such
breach.
6. OWNER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents,
empluvees and contractors such rights of entry anS /or temporary construction
easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the
completion of the Miller Portion.
7. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State 0 California.
8. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or
provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall
be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an
amount determined by the court to be reasonable.
9. This Agreement is binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits.
30. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or
to writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each
party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which
-3-
Im
e;57
L-A
is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or Promise Wt
contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this
Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the
cartles hereto.
IM WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the
day and year first above written.
CITY PROPERTY OietEll
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHHaHH+A Ricky P. Miller
CALIFORntA, a municipal Jeanne M. Miller
corporation
By:
JEFFREY KING, PAYOR
u iif
Beverly A. Authelet
city Clerk
.q.
1(,5/
h. )(F.
/J APPROVED AS TO FC0:
City Attorney
C;
HHftlftf YR #f H RHHIRMR t ftHRHttf #HH ftttitfHitlHtfHiMH### }H#}HtHf
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CO ss
UNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO
ale
19 before
AUTHELET personally known to tie to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of
the CITY OF RANCf10 CUCAMONDA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to
me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said
municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation
executed it.
WITNESS MY NAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL,
Not ary gna ure —
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
55
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO �,," �
W &ouwn y of �i�r yLS, leg before
sis of Satisfactory evidence
to be the p trson(s) whose name(s) L subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowleged that &0 exerutea it.
WITNESS MY HAND AND UH -IL-IK 5EAL
OFFICUAL SEAL (_
JUCRN A ACOS!A
.i — S&V m ZUM Ma avant(
10—_'r_ n, mR typ APR X 1e
NOTE: Miff, DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ABOVE
FIffIIT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATTOM/PARTNERSIIP ALg10WLEDGfliENi IS
-5-
126
PROPYL£ SCALE. HOR /Z + / 40' `-
V£RT
4 E
/4
EXHIBIT
4VE /VVE
1
a /
ti
� W
1 p
P b
°3
A
�a
.z
/a
MILLER
�ONOOn1 A
W
b b
0
i
oz I
0
b C
W
m
III
W
-e'
,so.'.
�ONOOn1 A
W
b b
0
i
oz I
0
b C
W
m
III
vo.
EXHIBIT "C'
"' w
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
UJIT
aaxr
_ti�ouw
73601D
J! _
A'
ZNG'N lLNG Dsru rSN'T
�-`a _ -
LF I
1
y
3
PR8LIMINARY
C. ��n '
COST ES �aT-' Dace: 7J241if.
SF
R1LKY 4_+FA%m MILLER BY: Leu
14Aa00
AV% .7D1- Z31.3B
vo.
TST'! I
nuAv -rte
wr
UJIT
aaxr
_ti�ouw
73601D
I I
Prr rlJR6 A. C-U=F.R
87 I
LF I
1
900 I
IT-
P DRIVE APPROACH (Z)
4e0
SF
3ro T
14Aa00
13
PCC. SID -_- WAU<
AID
SF
2°D
p�2e3rJ
j�
/ 7,:=;
RESOLUTION NO.-f/: g3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEHENT FROM
RICKY AND JEANRA MILLER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGN SATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in
conjunction with the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project.
WHEREAS, tnstallotion of curb, gutter, drive approach and pavement
located at 9700 Lemon Avenue, to be made part of the Lemon Avernre
Reconstruction Project.
WHEREAS, Ricky and Jeanna Miller have submitted a Lien Agreement as
reimbursement to the City for said improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Lien Agreement, authorizes the
Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record
same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County,
California.
IPASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
AFSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
er rey King. Mayor
/73
CCTV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council ann City Manager
FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 8902 located on the southeast corner of San
Bernardino Road and Grove Avenue submitted by Robert Kirshbaum
Parcel Map 8902 was approved by the Planning Commission on March 13, 1985, for
the division of 3.15 acres into two parcels in the Office /Professional
Development District located on the southeast corner of San Bernardino Road
and Grove Avenue. Improvement will be bonded and constructed at time of
building permit issuance.
hlY ;;d-1T,jjfi'9
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving Parcel Map 8902. acceptirg said agreement and security and
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said
map to record.
*Resp"etfully submitt
Attachments
1`
/ 7S-/
NI —�
CITY OF RANCHO CLr —kNI QNGq title
A
�� -��� � --obi
3 ENGINEERING DIVISION
tm VICINITY MAP N
pa ;e
RESOLUTION NO. O G
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8902
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8902)
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8902, submitted by Robert
Kirshbaum and consisting of two parcels, located on the southeast corner of
San Bernardino Avenue and Grove Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot
1, Tract 2952, as per map recorded in Book 41 of Hips, pages 2f. and 27,
Records of San Bernardino County, State of Californi+., was approved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: a,id
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 8902 is the fii.al map of the division of
land approved as sham on said Tentative Parcel Map: and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council o' said City have now been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 8902 be and the same
is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present save to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
Jeffrey King. Rayor
/(o
CITY Or RANCHO CUCA310NGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1996
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 8763 - Located north of Sixth Street,
west of oc ester venue, submitted by Ruchester Freeway
North Limited
Parcel Hap 8763 was approved by the Planning Comiission on October 10,
1984, for the division of 9 acres into 2 parcels in the Indus'.rial
Specific Plan Development District located north of Sixth Street, west
of Old Rochester Avenue.
The required street improveme,ts on Rochester Avenue have been .noted or,
the Improvement Certificate of the final map and will be constructed
Prior to issuance of building permits for the parcels.
A letter of acceptance has been received from the Cucamonga County Water
District.
It is recommended t.rat the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving Parcel Hap 8763, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to cause
said map *, record.
Re-spe4tf.ully submitted,
o Hu
City En neer
LBH:LB:nas
Attachment
1%%
gQlts:
lr�' CITY Y OF RANCHO C['CA \IONGA
,'. ENGINC•ERING DI \'IS10N
6 VICIN „v \I,�P
„n
I.- .
lc;
page
RESOLUTION R0. "°`-°' M IS' IS'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8763
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8763)
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8763, submitted by Rochester
Freeway North, Limited and consisting of 2 parcels, located north of Sixth
Street, west of Old Rochester Avenue being a division of Lot 3% map of
Rochester, as per plat recorded in Book 9, page 20 of Maps, records of San
Bernardino County wat approved by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 8763 is the final map of the division of
land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met.
NON, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the C. 7 Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 8763 be and the same
is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk
Jeffrey ng, ayor
/ �9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FRDM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS AND IMpROVENEAT
t e
venue west a Hermosa venue, submitted by Cri•.mar
Development Corporation
Tracts 9441 and 11609 were approved by the City Council on Febniary 21,
1985.
The developer, Crismar DevgloPwant Corporation, ubsitted an agreement
and security to guarantee the construction of they off -site bgrovements
in the following amounts
Faithful Performance Bonds Labor L Matorfals Ugnds
Phase I y}41,700 Pli4sa 1 70,850
Phase It S14A'InQ phase Ii bete 741100
PPbase i11 $252.4iq jP�p'ihh+ate it 12661
Phase VY��5,3000tl pfi8se YY 325,OQ
At this time the developer is requesting apptoval of a twalve month
extension IT sald Hiprdiement Agreements.
It is recommended that the City CpuncI aQopt 1114 attached resolution
acrcPFlllpp uld agpreement extensions iA securities, end authorizing the
Mayor an H Clly Clprk to sign said agreements.
/ Aas tfu IY to ttod,
L IM1191 t I near
LBH:LB:nas
Attachment
�gQ __
Cm Ur ROOIC C"C"OR('
Iwainta T (ITERS' AC DIERT
FOR
It
t fs sadt Nd MtMld Into
RNOV uE 1[N bT TPESE PRESENTS: That this agreeeNa by +ne
Act cr eM S o
to Cmf"ote Mlth the vreAflm> of the SubdNblm MID mtMtt�MIs Said
PNCne EYCOemR +. C+llforna, o Iaetctvd Co lievelo 4,
city. heralnatter referred to as the Cltyv
refnred to as tm Dealoper.
yiTl($Y.iP:
flat. UK laid Ce..lov!r entered 'nth N IevroreRint agrto t with the
Cllr +a a rNUl,,to to ISSUMCe of Dol.dinDl patsies, and
,KREAS, sold peveloper delitts N eattndm u/ tree to cmptete lM east of
the said teprcreetot a4reteret.
NW. THEREFOPE. it it hereby "'red br the clef and by odd Doralever
at
fall ors: rmMt a9ee t is
r'th of " amlthe (rm the date o q nSlll K+proral
1.
The cmplattm site of the tens of the sold emo EILlRM-
hereby eet•.Aded by A q
the raid tTtei°t• t «brides to reflect CRAMt ievrorI &h ll to
the rerdapM tIsh this •Dreeetnt ••! thdl et
!. t Hass IA 1eMDrnM
Shall be fvniCned AttorMr•
,pprortd by the Car nts thereof Rn tat
S. Ih, rt7ttred bond •tee the add1Um11 principal aanu
forth m IM dtacted sheet. rt�t apre"o"t Shad
�• All other tern Id Witimf of the tale ItprD
reoaln to ace.
the perelRpn teat sumlttN tl mew described teprertetnt
As erlee lM! the trsoandel Im D„L*s Mreto:L•lned mnln. Ne of iota o
of Comely Nd me affixed his OP
at yFITHM PERROVINCE I=
Additim•1 PrlevlDll Aeosnt: IVA
V%TER1At AND [ANCf 5W
Addtim+l Principal Aehr t:
tM DEPOSIT m3la"tbb RfaO
Addlttmd Cash Orposa• 61e RIA
MINIEIIRRdE gµRANT[E m
Prtnclp•t Aaevnt:
vas l0 6C•D.NCt
et the or by the CIp.
To a vo .....o41tmct.of the or ....... w...........u.u..
............... EP
Clot v AAACRO I utmpardtm
Oj IEORRIA, t em D
by: m C ms qVr
pET[to?
Cra
ur Oaralope. u tt
: a Pn Ctclraveonne tfon.
stet r n. sot at. it
Q' %on, DETWER'S SIGRATUIE rUST BE 1gTAPIEEO
III, I "W"Ai ne ndfwA
IM'APIIMhI tiltosim AWLLMN,
FOR
pNDd ALL Mn U 1 ^ELM PRESENtS pr0elalpns /OIt t0a SvWjveMfan 1u0 �dIt the entries Into'
Of
In Confervanae v California. I (ins tip/I corporation. by and botvaen tM said
Pena [•Kaeamga, y i ore t [ Oa Auw eforred r� /Rr"roOnatPayyyrpoel*peN a the C1tY. A^d I nor De
NITNESSETN:
I'll. ,PE�iaiu tavlacumn o�rOed iillEl *Mf�le,rv�Itf.r�inAt /greeMl uN LM
WKPEAS. Said Developer deairta an a" Altod of it" to co/plete LM teen of
the said Iupl'.n t /grie"A",.
pN, IM0.EfWE, It Is hereby agreed Oy lit City NO by said Developer As
fellers _ le
1 TM [ A,I.tlon data If the tenet �onl�s Ira[ the data Ott ivlre aott[nt of
Mre*y C.terdtd by I perloo of It
City LovnS� /ppreset
the said Igrea,rai.
2 Nv
l reflect ef costs
Inrbse In IlQ- tde th's'91Caeeband M11
Shall M /mnlNed by thp rg
,pro," by in* City Attorney De
S. /orN "Ire Iond O that, Iddttlonai nrincl0al M.-t. are t<t
/. All other tel and conditions o/ the alai IapOratnt ag*teant Ma!
a 1
.auln tee she•
As e,josecc of undeer"sdt OdIAS tr n*' ,,hied tre OG 1W described *"Ov1atnt
Coolly vied saes.
security. And not I,filed his Signature hereto.
FAITI M PEAy0NAka $ORD
Additional p.•nc ipai Aenunl. N/A
Descriptlwt. N/A
Surety:
Addrett
INTLr Ial AND 1A0011 Pop
Adaltlanal principal Aoowt: N/A
Description: WA
Surety:
Address
fASN 11(IDfIT ION1P'E>•T IeG 40ND
NSA
AddrLOml Cash Depose t:
au,%,E,j NCE QELNANIEE SW
",."Pal Alaiat IVA
posted prier to acceptance of tM protect by the C[tr.
............ ....... au.... a . .......................u.nw....
ClIT pEYELDPEe
L&I DE IA, . NCAMNW ration an
(AIf 00.AiA. • --141 141 corpo Crl�0
Olt t. yar
Aube: Karl* Wry. president
ben 7 t et. tl er
/O•% pit: Cammirx'S SIGsaw "isy t[ pTAa1Rn
0 c-
RESOLUTION NO. •EQ&4Z -S* 8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 01* RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT 16REEMENT
EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACTS 9441 AND
11609
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucawonga,
Crlifornia, has for its consideration Improvement Agreement Extensions
executed on March 5, 1986, by Crismar Development Corporation as developer,
for the improvement of public right -of -wry adjacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located on Wilson Avenue, west
of Hermosa Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Inprovomcnt Agreements and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tracts 9441 and 11609; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extensions are secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are
ides ied in said improvement Agreements.
NOW, TKREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extensions and
said Improvement Securities be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor
is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extensions un behalf
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *.
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authe et, City Clerk
Jeffrey M79, Mayor
fn
— MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd 3. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT
B - Located 65 e
northwest corner Or L9th and Hermosa, submitted by Roy E.
Daly and Company
Tract No. 11781 was approved by the City Council on January 3, 1985 and
Tract 11625 was approved by the City Council on January 23, 1985.
The developer, Roy E. Daly and Company submitted an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off -sit3 improvements in
the following amounts:
Faithful merformance Bond: f 425.000
Labor and Material Bond: S 46.000
At this time, the developer is requestingg the -ovaoent Agreement for
Tract 11781 be extended until June 15, .,uu and the Improvanent
Agreement for Tract 11625 be extended until May 15, 1986.
RECOK+ENCATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
accepting said agreement extension and security, and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ResD tfully suhmi ed,
Lloyd k bs
CityYgineer
LP :t:LB:nas
Attachment
l ��
CITY OF LUDO WCAMWA
DVRDTOEIIT EITFASIOR AGME ER
FOR
taJ.[T Irtel
OW ALL MEN By THESE PRESERTS: That this agremmt Is Win and entered 13to,
In ConfOrwKe with the PrOUi SIMS of the Subdivision Hip Act M the City of
aatMo Coc emgaa California, a esciclpal CorporatlM, by "I betwto the Said
City. hereinafter referred t0 as the City, and aty L Dal, and woa,
referred to as the Developer.
YITIESSEnt:
THAT, kWAEAS said Developer "term Into an tpmeltent agr,,,wnt with the
City as a rMssits to Ilsoplce Of buildings scrolls. and
HAERIAS, said Developer desires p extension of elq to cmplats the tam of
Use said tsvnp event agreoent.
RM THGEFDpE, it Is hereby agreed by the City IM by said Dmlcw as
fol lens:
1. The cppletton data of the tam of the sa'd leprorment sgreceelt is
hereby CxWded to J. IS. ties.
2. TAtreasa In tpr0r10ent sturitles t0 reflect Wrttnt Iap.m,t Costs
shall be furnished by tth developer with this alo,,aot and shall be
APING by the City Attorney.
S. The repJired bond ton the addl[IOnaI principal AOoOnts thereof are let
forth on the attattud shat.
a. All Other tvwS aM corAillons of the sale Iprovmcnt deg m t Shall
main the foe.
As "Ida," of MOemt&Ming SM ~,IM, COnttintd thrift. no of Intent to
"MI) with Sant, the D1.e1ow has ,bitted the below described IpravNent
serurlty, and has Wised his signature aerate:
fATTIEIL PMgMYICC !OD
I.e .ription, Additional Principal Aww-: N/A
A., ty:
Address.
MTERIAL AEC LABOR OW
Description:
Surety: WA
Additional Principal Ascots: A
Address:
CAM DEPOSIT K KMTM Vw
Additional Cash Deposit:
KUXM U CWAMEEC Bum
To DQ posted prior to aCCPrincipal Aeomltl
eptanCo Of the twoject by the City.
City OF wuCHO CDCAMWA p'Mg� /p /LKK /pp//JJ��
CALIfWIG, i e1MCID +1 corporation
By:
Jeffrey King. Kyr
Attest:
ay • , tr
SM: DEVELOPER'S SICJIATUAC MW BE aOfARi®
/O J
a
v
i n
CITY K RWJO JrADIW
I79ROTOW EIiTRSIOH AMEOiEIiT
fill
It-0 n'8
AWOY ALL HER 51 THESE PREsChrs: That this agraement is made and entered into,
1n Camara""' NN the Pravislens of the Subdivision Hap Act Of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, a Wnlcipals�orooratia D Aid betwen the said
City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and �' [. �+rr and Capang
referral to as the "dope
VITHESSETH:
THAT, VNEREAS said Developer anterod into an teproremtnt agneent with the
City al a noplslte to Itsee¢e of bVildings limits. and
WOMEAS, said Developer deslms an attention of tie to complete the term 01
the said Itprdrement agreement.
Rd THEAEFDRE, it is hereby agreed hr the City and by said Developer a
folio":
I. The epmoletldn pomp o/ the ten-, t the said tarovisent agrmepant is
Mrelr attended to mV IS. 1986
.• lftmwe to lmrdvemant R alts bo reflect Curren. immw giant costs
than be fumtthtd by the dlnloper •tth this agreement and shall be
tpprd IS ty the City Attor my.
S. The Sutural bond and the additional principal aaamts Seemf are sat
forth to the attached shpt.
1. All clear teas and cWditians of tae said feprprnont agreement shall
remain the sae.
AL trldence Of understanding the MVltlom contained herein, and of intent to
comply with saes, the Dtvtlaper has Submitted tae Mlw described iaproromit
sea:rlty, led Ms affixed his slgnatm hereto:
FATIMA. PFAFDR7u= BDL
Dmscrlpeton;
Surety: md Additional Principal Aitt N/A
Amnia:
MATERIAL Alto LA" BM
Description: Additional principal Arrant: R/A
Sdretyi
Minis:
CAVI DERWITHommyrisc will
Additional Cash Depaslt:
K%lWrDWCE CLLMAxrEF qC!,D
To be posted prior to acceptance of tAe PrfmIPal Amount:
O Of t«««OJtteiti by the City.
CITT OF RANCHO WCAHOpCA DEVELOPER CALIMMIA, a aus.cipal corporation
Br:
rev ng. gor ��
Attest:
lar y et, V
NM: OEVV- CPPER'S SIBRAT1BtE AM BE RDIAAIZED
— f �r
RESOLUTION NO. 40b4t-*W— 8(0 . 4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11781 AND
TRACT 11625
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Exten•
executed on March 19, 1986, by Roy E. Daly and Company as developer, for ,
improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of 19th
Street and Hermosa Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereif, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning
Comm ission, Tracts 11781 and 11625; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by
good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is Identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I+T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTL T:
Beverly A. Authe et, Ly
Jeffrey KNF9. Mayor
/1?7
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
April 2, 1986
Mayer and Members of the City Council
Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer
Linda Beek, Engir._ericg Technician
telCAarq
o s
� z
s
ice: 1
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
ocate
in [ract o on t e
northeast corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue,
submitted by Forecast Mortgage Corporation
Development Review 85 -32 was approved by the Planning Commission on
December 9, 1985, in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District
located in Tract 12176, Lot 9, on the northeast corner of Civic Center
Drive and Utica Avenue.
The developer Forecast Mortgage Corporation, is submitting an agreement
and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements
In the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: S 8.500
Labor and Material Bond: $ 4,250
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Hater
District.
It is recommended thet the City Council adopt the attached resolution
accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City
Clerk to sign said agreement.
tRespe ed,
LC
LH:LB:ns
Attachments:
III
I
CITY OF
RANCHO C'!CAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
PROJECT: °•R•
TITLE;
/85EXHIBIT.- aA'
A
CITY OF RAMCMO CUCMONGA
IMPROVEMENT ACREENEST
FOR
DR 85 -72
CROW ALL MEN BY THVE FAESENTS: That this agreement 1s
=ado AnH entered Into, In ConfOrmanCt with the previsions of the
Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancto Cocomenga,
State of Cal ssifornia@ a CmCont�l.c'ralI. rerporation, hereinafter referr-
ed and FOAECASI 6FVTa AUg COA�WATIOWy and hereinafter feiJ Clay
horelnatter referred to as
Lhe eve ooa�T --
THAT. WHEREAS. $eal 0ereloper desires to devoid yy certain
real property in said City located IN TRA°T 012176, LOT 9
I and
WHEREAS, fold City has established certain requirements
to be net by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final
approval: add
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of
Improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the
City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior cooplellon of
said requirements fbr the purpose of securing said approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, It is h2reby agreed by and between the
City and the Developer as follow•
1 The Developer heresy agrees to construe* at
developers expense all improvements described on page a hereof
within 12 months fros the date hereof
2 This agreement shall be effective on the date of the
resolution of tea Council of said City aperoving this
agreement. This agreement shalt be In defle 10 on the day follow.
ing the first anniversary data of said approval unless an esten-
lion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid.
ed
S. The Developer may request additional time In which
to complete the provisions of this agreement. In writing not less
than CO days prior to the default date, and includingp a statement
Of circumstances of necessity for admit lm dal time In considera-
tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the
provisions hereof, '"Clue Ing construction standards, cost
a tlast*, and Sufficiency If the Iesrovoent security and to
require adjustments thereto whom warranted by substantlai changes
therein
e If the Developer falls or nglects to camply with
the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right
at any time to cause $aid provlsl ns to be completed by any law-
ful means. and thereupon to reco.er from said Dow eloplr and /or
his Sun ty the full cost and esDenae ltnrrod in so doing,
5 Construction permits stall be obtnlned by the Oevei-
door free the office of the City Eigleser prier to start of an
work within the public right- of -w,y, and ties developer shall
conduct such work In full eompl,ance w'th the regulations
contained therein. Non-compliance say resv,t In stove l fag of the
work by the City, and assessment of ,he De.altlas provided
6. Public right -of -way impcdvement work required shall
be constructed In conformance with iptrovcd Improvement plans,
Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any ads jai
-1-
FORECAST MORTGAGE CORPOPATIOD
S.F., O.A., Net., P.M..CVP 19D
""ducats thereto. Ceastruction shall Include Say traasttioas
tad /or ether Incidental nrk date" necessary fee dralnair er
Public safety. Errars ee owlif ilof discovered Airing ce,itrec-
tlas shall be corrected a", the directip cf the city
Engineer. pulsed work due to said plan wdlttcatio s shall he
covered by toe preHslaas of this agrfene,t and Stirred by tha
surety cavarl.q tee eri9iaal ylapued works.
7. Yale dueo within eaistlag streets shall t diligam,t-
17 ourtwed to caOpletms; the City shall hue the right to
cerstet• boy and all wart in the event of vajuilifled delay to
completion. aid to recover all cast and aspewae incurred frr the
Developer tadlor his contractor by s.y laurel wins.
S. The Oeveleyer shall be reganslble for reptrcev,e,t.
reloc:tiaos* or resoval of any carrosent of cry errtgatta, water
system, to ceorl•ct with the r"a /red earl to the sattsfactian of
the City Engineer and the suer of the water system,.
9. The Dovel0V9- shall be responsible for reseval of
a;l lease rest and aches debris from, the public right-of-way.
10. The Developer shall plant and plitbia partway
tree% as directed by the Community Cavelo nest Oiractor.
11. The im,prevem,ant security to be raraished by the
Developer to eoarant -e couplet$" of tae te. of `S,% agraweat
shall to subject to the approval Of the City Attorney. The prto-
cipal spun of 1610 Improvement security shall wet be loss than
the Moves stare:
•2.
/ T/
CITY OF Nape Ctg'AIMWA
DaZoarE PPWIR FFM SSD VXE
3ML: Does wt Include mrtvat fee tar
aa-Iting petit ar pasatat demits
OOtg7TTT tsil
IT14
PRICE
N4M
I-F.
L.F.
D.C.C. srrh . 12' 241 gmer
725
L.F
P.C.C. �b . 5• C.F 24• gutter
V,
P.C.C. mro mly
6..00
L.F.
A.C. Den
5.50
S.F.
l• P.C.C. sidevala
t.`50
1.77
S.F.
S.F.
Otte acpmam
8• P.C.C. at :s gutter (fm. torsi
2.50
BCD
C.T.
C.*-
SttM eataiAtfm
I.7artm mtafamt
7.a0
1.50
S.F. S.F
of s ode
0.!5 I so
omshed Agg
A tmer9 ase (P: ch thick)
0.07
TOR
A_- f((SOO to 1700 tms)
2s:�
imN
45.00
S.F.
l~i.CC. . (ndero� tm)l
A.C. (7• thick)
®'03
S.F.
S.F.
Perm A.C. (tram)
D.SS
1.75
Ex
I• thin A.C_ ovcl.r
o.03
EA.
Adjust serr nWOle m
EA.
Adjnt sew Clem M to grade
150.1.1
--
-_
�_ EA.
sueet wB valrn to grade
Streit ltgatt
75.00
SSaO afo)
2j.
1000.00
1.01
LF.
ream heaatr
1.75
S.F.
amoral of A.C. P.reitat
O.30
L.F.
L.F.
Rasoval of P.C.C. e¢e
00
EA.
li m al Of A.C. hen
Stmt sign
1.00
IA
L.F.
geflectars am xsts
�.m
25'03
-_-
S.F.
Ca to block •.il
Retaining wlI
25.00
TUR
Aggregate ease
20.00
_._ C.T.
---- VF.
CmaC.e strsctan
la` RCP 2000 0
7.03
425.00
L.F.
L.F.
2:• Q8
36• to
1500 D
2000 0�
29.00
35.00
L.F.
EA.
49• Ell
]200 D11111)
49.03
76.00
�--- EA-
L,... baste Y • 4•
rAtth basto Y a a•
MM 00
EA.
EA.
Calm bufA Y • 22•
x'03
4Sm
teal de0reisim 41
Lout dearessim 12•
500.00
00
EA.
FA.
Omstim ittuctorm
1000.00
5003.03
�L
Dion Structure Std 0SD5
Sui==t' Std 0507
1503.03
EEA..
L.F.
iOutIIdn
Dolts
500.00
40.00
em
9nrd pawl („md)
25.03
EL
L.F.
� IL (4g• rlag)
_-'
'-- bead"
2.03
4000.00
-L= S-F.
�- t.F•
taodiupt t Irigatim
.")
1.75
j 50
M-MT )`CASH CM711MICT COSTS mr)
XWJCCUMM �r (CASs) L"M M M TTER a= I=) s.
"rermost to 4 a!�f 6lestne i as%,� �ae.Q. ti eaaiftp tt"I,
ftwifed in pow t.
r _ IMI �T
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNLSL OF THE CLTr OF 11111100)
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, INFRUMNENTf AMM48Rt
AND INPROVENENT SECURITY FOR DSSDPRFNR REVMWi ROL. 85.T -P
WHEREAS, the City CounciT of the Clty, off Randrm Ciuczewmgl�„
California, has far its eonsideratiam aT Improv9aert Aged: execut b on
March 11, 1986, by Forecast Mortgage Corporatiom as devalbper. a fimr life
improvement of publ fe right- of-way, adjacent ta; tire rears p+apertyy spea3fMcm1Mq
described therein, and generally Tatatei im Ti-act II176y, Unit 41„ am Me
northeast corner of Civic Center Drive amb Uticm Avenue" ands
WHEREAS, the installation of sect. Imprmauerts,, de;cr*ibodl tm saM
Improvement Agreement and subject to the term therm is ttu be dime fm
conjunction with the development of said reel property- as refesnn b tm Rfimr1bgI
Commission, Development Review No_ 85-34 and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is sesu edj an%b aaauzowf-eU by/
good and sufficient Improvement Security,, whicin it I'deatMeh fm saddh
Improvement Agreement.
HOW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED' by the City, Cmu zfr, off the Cfi1y aff
id:
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that sa Imprm ea>BrC Agree mi: amH sddl
Improvement Security be and the same are hoebyi apprmre�U anti tine NSyprr is
hereby authorized to .ign said Improvement Agre�emt on, hehsTF afF Lire MW odF
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this'' daffy afF
AYES:
NOES:
ATTEST:
very A_ Authe et, City Clerk
tag;
/93
RESOLUTION NO -,EO4 R ?G- ?9
,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUABER 9301,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 93011, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 9301, submitted by haven Tec mtcal
Center Partners, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the east de of
Haven Avenue, south of Arrow Route, being a division of a portion of the south
29D fleet of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 1993 was approved by the Plinning
Cocmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 13, 1985; and
WHEREAS. Parcel Map No. 9301 is the final map of the division o? land
approved as shown ur said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council of said City nave now been met
by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Impro%ement
Security by Haven Technical Center Partners as developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvemerr. Security submitted by said developer be and the sane are hereby
approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement
on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest, snd
that said Parcel Map No. 9301 be and the same is hereby approved and the City
Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for
record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED thi:: * day of *, 19*.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
ever y A. Aut a et, City Clerk
e rey ng, ayor
brATA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP IMPROVEMENT AOREEMENi AND IMPROVEMENT
CUR T 0 - oCate on a east s de of
Haven nue, soutft�Tr_row Route, submitted by Haven
Technical Center Partners
Tentative Parcel Map 9301 was approved by the Planning Commission on
November 13, 1985, for the division of 5.24 acres into 2 parcels in the
Industrial Specific Plan Development District located on the east side
of Haven Avenue, south of Arrow route.
The developer, Haven Technical Center Partners, is submitting an
agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site
improvements In the following amounts:
Faithful Perrormance Bond: $ 50.000
Labor and IA;Aerial Bond: S 25.000
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Hater
District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving Parcel Map 9301, accepting said agreement and security, and
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause
said map to record.
Respectfully ubmit ed,
00ofdll b }�
City tny!�oe ^/
L64:LB:nas
Att,.chment
1 _
rt.
191{
- vrcrNlTY MAP
N.TS.
nr
y�o° ff CITY OF RANCHO CUCArv((
ENGINEERING DIVISION
rm VICINITY MAP
1 \ Pace
N pate
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR
PARCEL HAP 9301
An OR ALL MEN AT THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement Is
Dade and entered Into, 1N Conformance with the provisions of the
Municipal Cade and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, a munlclpaI Corporation, veralnafter referr-
ed to as the cityr by and between said City
and HAVEN TECH CENTER PARTNERS hereinafter referred to as
the Developer
THAT, WHEREAS, laid Developer desires to deveoyyy certain
real property In said City located E/0 HA "-II 9/0 ARROW.
; and —
WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements
to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final
approval; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of
Improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the
City Attorney, are deemed to bt equivalent to prior completion of
said requirements for the purpose of securing said apprt al
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the
City and the Developer as follow:
1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct at
developer'% expense all improvements described on page a hereof
withln 12 months from the date hereof.
2. This agreement shalt be effective on the date of the
ttiOlutlon of the Council of said City approving this
agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow -
Ing the 'Irst anniversary date of said approval unless an eaten.
slon of t,me has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid-
ed.
3 The Developer may request additional time in which
to complete too provlsl on$ of this agreement, In writing not less
than JO days prior to the default data, and Including a statement
of circumstances of necessity for additf one) time In considera-
tloa of such 1e91est, the City reserves the right to review the
provisions hareo ;. Including construction standardt, cost
aft lmate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to
require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes
therein
a. If the Developer falls or neglects to comply Nth
the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right
at any tine to cause sold provisions to be completed by any law.
ful means, and thereupon to reco,er from said Developer and /or
his Surety the full cost and expense Incurred in so doing
S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel-
oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any
work within the public right- of -wy, and the dewgloptr shall
conduct such work in full Compliance with the regulations
contained therein. Mon- CCOPIIAnce may result In stapplag of the
work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided.
6. Public right -of -ray improvement work required shall
be constructed In conformance with approved inprovemtnt plans,
Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings add any special
-1.
7365 HE.UW; AVEINE
RANCHO COCAMONOA, CA 91730
S.F., D.R., Lt.. P.M..CWP /C) /_
aeendmuis thereto Construction shall InS,ude any transitions
and /or other Incidental wort deemed necessary for drainage Or
Public safety. Error% or eplisions discovered during construe-
tic, shall be corrected spon the direction of the City
Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modificatipms shall be
Covered ty the provisions of this agreement and secured by the
surety covering the original planned works
7, tiort done within existing streets shall be 41119ent-
ly pursued to cpmplstldn; the City shall have the -fight to
complete any and all work In the event Of unju%tiffed Coley in
completion, and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the
Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful suns
8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement,
relocations, or removal of any conDOnent of any Irrigation water
%y%ten in conflict with the required work to the setisf act ton o/
the Clty Engineer and the owner of the water System-
9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of
all loose rock Cad other debris from the public right -Of -way.
10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway
trees as directed by the Community Development Director
11 The improvement security to be furnisted by the
Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement
shall be subject to the approval of tht City Attorney. The prtn-
clpal amount of said improvement security shall not be last thed
the amount showat
-t-
/97
,w
QUANTITY
•'•~
ITEM
CITY OF RANCHO CUChMON011
MOUNT
ENGII.EERING DIVISION
•
CIICROmmi:hr PERMIT fEE SCIIEDULE
Far Ieprarement
Patrol Nap 9701
Date: 2 .6d---
Ceapule y: at SCIDCaP -'
File Rerercncd'9
:
City Drawln5 No. _ XULd
NOTE: roes not Include moment fee for
L.F
writing peeatt or pavement deposits
QUANTITY
UNIT
ITEM
PRICE
MOUNT
40
L.F
D.C.C. curb - 12• C.F 24• gutter
7.2;
if6 _
L.F
P.C.C. curb - S' C.F 24' gutter
6.00
L.F
P.C.0 curb only
5.50
-'�
L.F
F.C. berm
4.50
nvT -
S.F.
4- P.C.C. sidewalk
1.75
. u9 n•
70:0_
'.F
Drive approach
2.50
7 129 m+
S.F
8' P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc curb)
3.40
S7C-
C.T
Street excavation
1.50
+.AM M
C.T
Imported eabankment
1.50
9777 -
S.F
Preparation of subgrate
0.15
1.a14o5
9RS-
S.F
Crushed
agg. base (per inch thick) 3
4 0.07
TOY
A.C.
(over IJ00 tans)
27.00
_
TOY
A.C.
(900 to 1700 tons)
35.00
-�
TOY
A.C.
to 900 tons,
45.00
21�-
TON
A.C.
(((500
under 500 tons)
60.00
n .aon"ca
S.F.
A.C.
J• MCA)
0.55
•,5 _
S.F
Patch
A.C. (trench)
1.75
•.101.71
3240
S.F
1• thl'k A.C. overlay
0.33
972.00
1
EA.
Adjust sewer manhole to grade
250.00
250.M
EA.
Adjust stv'.:lean art to grade
150.00
I
EA.
Adjust water .Alves to grad'
75.00
SI).00
I_
EA.
Street lights
IOLO.M
o0
25
L.F
Barricades (fntarsec SS,.-3 molt.;
600
_3,o00
SC".M
391
L.F
2 a a• rerwaod 'wader
1.75
eezn
210
S.,
Removal rc 6 , pavment
O.JS
73.50
Ito
'.P.
Removal of P L., '.."t. dissi,e-t
1.70
691.00
L.F
Removal a! A.0 Per-,
1.00
EA.
Street Wns
200.00
22
EA.
Reflectors and Sorts
15.0
LF
Castrate block will
25.00
_
S.F
Retaining wall
20.00
TOY
Aggregate base
7.OD
C.T.
Concrete structures
42S.00
L.F.
18' RCP (2000 D
29.00
L.F.
24• PCP ((1500 D
35.OD
-�
LF
36' RCP 2000 0
49.00
--
L..F
49• RCP (1200 7
76.00
EA.
Cato, basin v
• v
2000.00
--
EA.
Catch basin W • 8'
2900.00
EA.
Catch basin W • 22'
4SOO.OD
_
EA.
Local depression 4'
500.00
EA.
Lxal,depre3Sion :2'
1000.00
EA.
Junction sciuctcrel
5000.00
_
EA.
Outlet structure. Std 1505
1500.00
' I
EA.
outlet structure, Std /507
500.00
sno.oe
EA.
Guard posts
40.00
L.F
Guard panel (wood)
25.00
190
L.F
Sawcut
2.00
--nO.Tu-
EA.
Oal"11.1 (a8' w1n9)
4000.00
L.F
Redwood header
1.75
420L_
S.F.
Landscepinyy a Irrigation
2.75
1i
9.n on
L.F
8311 curb (P.C.C.)
7,50
ENGINEERING INSPECTIUI FEE SUB TOTAL 43,663.23
•RESTORATION /DELINEATION CASH COMINGENCT COSTS 103 -17.313737-
DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) FAITHFUL IERFOR2WICE BOND (2003)
tMINAOIEINATION SURETT. (CM) /300.00 REAOW AND MATERIAL BOND (503)
,•'
"Pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamonga � foal [ode• Title 1. Chapter 1.08, adopting See ,
b
Bernardino County Code Titles. CMD!er$ 1_5. a easA nstoratta, dailnea -Im deposit shall ,,, 4
D
FAITHFUL PERFORRAR:E
Type: P, Incipal Amount: 50,500
aims and address of surety:
MTERIAL AND LABOR
Type: Pr1ACIP11 Amount: 25,750
Name and address of surety:
CASH DEPOSIT PONUHENTATICN
Type: Principal Amount: 1.300
Name and address of surety:
TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY
In WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents to be dull executed and ape owletge With all formalities
required by law on the date set h opposite their Signatures
Date n�.A ey Developer
Data A)(11% by(--- /F'eca.ti•.. Developer
Acceptrd:
Nan n uufp1SV� _ J
inwnn ?AR
19980 ee1 Cg1,P3
o,�tsleh li. 6 ry.,w w,,,,n,v„a.xw,nw rr
R .r [varwM..r.nr_ ema[ V_ [•[Rvjtt. PAUL Qllv_ers
EG ,0...•aTYY Mrn ,emu, Y�.dYp�b
.rv.r ec .._.._
.. r.va Haven tneh Center Partners
— hiwwrwy ( Dwfa!A DiCVYf
C r.. .nw.w,u.rY 4 ,.w.rm Y`1i13'�N
s Off.
Y.oYa � �l,Ar
9 w,ntll
' R tw• � ��' nY.... sur,.w aw
i DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES RUST BE NOTARIZED
-3-
SDDmTISIOM
GUARA47EE NO PERFORMANCE
(SETTING OF Flhac MONUMENTS)
city council
City of Rtneho Cucamonga
P 0 Boa 607
Rancho Cuamonga, California 91730
Gent l teen:
Parsuent to Chapter 4 Article 9, S<ct ton 66497 of the Government On
Code, the undersigned hereof agrees that all mOnveare to be set
the final map of PH 9701
and furnished oy a su d r er s eny neer as rsDee if lad in the
Wore
to furnish the
Engineers or ur,.Y.r a arc cat. an agrhes
notes thereon to complete all engtnaerin9 red ulrueats specified
to Section 66497, of the Government Coda
The undarf l9nsd hinds you here alit the Sum of $ 1 00.00
dnuvrn
as 4 ash deposit, said deposit to 9uara tee t at a defiled f AS
will ethset A dsptc if tedes6 that•the engineers Orr, surveyor •ill the
he on ,J by the undersigned
It Is further understadd and agreed that In the Brent the ithill
timerus�pecified. to •the Cityl of Rancho Cucnl9a is requirement authorized t to
costs thereof d is eto toe ea ncharge c Completed
a9alnst said ash deposit, and the
Lnf fro oeo as atohthcrdifeldlty Ns l h Eeptfit e et the eaerCi
fund
It is further agreed that if tl.e undersigned Ones not present or
Ovid a nce to the City Council that he has paid the and engineer the
•vrveyor for the setting of the final monuments,
enqIneer or Surveyor glees the notices prescrlo.d in Sectilln the 561,97 of the Government Dose, herein City Shall Day to said en9lnear
If the cost of completing said ragulrements exceeds the :court of
the ash deposit. the undersigned agrees to Day the difference
.Ilhin thirty (10) days after receiving vritton Statuent from
the City of Rancho Cucamonga snCcifying the amount of the
difference hetueen the cash deposit and the actual cost of said
requirements
Cordially,
xAVCta TFKx CexTC• _, suhdnvleef
7769 NCLULW 'LVE,— Address
PANCNO tVC' "_..�. et r7p
Date Meech 16. 1986
The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash
deposit) shall he��
vl[1 7369 Na Imn Ave. Ranchoo siucammn a Cal 91730
less r
TOtEE SUBMITTED FULLT FILLED OUT AND SIGNED
f��iT
— CITY OF RANCHO CL GAbiONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE* April 2, 1986 19
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -OIA
request to amen a and -Vse Kiy�y-Tie
General an from Low Density Residential (2 -4 t--!ac) to
Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 13 SC acres
of land located on the south side of Feron Blvd..,etween
Archibald and Turner Avenues - APN 209 - 055 -02, 03, 8 14.
1. BACKGROUND: On February 19, 1986, the City Council held a Public
ear ng on this item and determined that approval of the proposed
Amends+ent would be appropriate. ilowever, at the time the required
docmentatlon authorizing the applicant to act on behalf of the
pr„perty owner was not submitted to the City. Consequently, the
City Council held off on approval of the required Resolution
pending sibmittal of such authorization by the applicant.
On March 10, 1986, we received the appropriate materials along with
a letter from our City Attorney stating the authorization is in
order. No additional information is needed prior to final action
on this Application.
tied,
Brao,ouiier
City Planner
BB,.OK :das
of the attached Resolution and the
•ation is recocsended.
Attachments: Letter from City Attorney
Aut;iorization
February 19, 1986 Council Report
Resolution Of Approval
—am
Otto Eroutil
Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Hawkins Ceneral Plan Amendment
Dear Otto:
Enclosed please find an original of the letter I
requested verifying the fact that the proper party has
applied for the above - referenced general plan amendment.
The letter is in order so long as tha property description
stated in the letter matches the property to which the
general plan amendment would apply. Assuming that the
correct property is described, the matter ought to be
placed back on the Council consent calendar for the next
meeting for final approval.
JLM:sjk
Encl.
Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
James L. Markman
City Attorney
City of Rancho Cucamonga
-RECEIVED -
CnY OF RANCHO CUCAUONOA
FLMNINO DIYOION
AM MAR 101986
8
�03 !
7:.
Nuwen Dxc cnlc i
JAV i! l xxRFV1N
IOYNTM IWO
l.O. YOF 1010
xxDRLW V xe02TNfR1
RAV. D NAN5ON
eRP\GUIORMM 030ii•101e
O CR JO IOx
�nW HO.OIOI
T[\VMONL
xARTMA JO Oil! \,R
1)1 60" 30"
March 6, 1986
Otto Eroutil
Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Hawkins Ceneral Plan Amendment
Dear Otto:
Enclosed please find an original of the letter I
requested verifying the fact that the proper party has
applied for the above - referenced general plan amendment.
The letter is in order so long as tha property description
stated in the letter matches the property to which the
general plan amendment would apply. Assuming that the
correct property is described, the matter ought to be
placed back on the Council consent calendar for the next
meeting for final approval.
JLM:sjk
Encl.
Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
James L. Markman
City Attorney
City of Rancho Cucamonga
-RECEIVED -
CnY OF RANCHO CUCAUONOA
FLMNINO DIYOION
AM MAR 101986
8
�03 !
LAW OFfICE5
SANGER. GRAYSON. GINNER 8 BOOKS
D4600 -000
March 4, 1986
James Markman, Esq.
city Attorney Duplicate Via Messenger
Post Office Box 1059
Brea, California 92622 -1059
Re: Deukmejian Fanny Trust
Dear Mr. Markman:
This letter will confirm that in accordance with the
torus and provisions of the reukmejian Family Trust dated March
22, 1979 (the *Trust"), Joan Deukmejian is presently sole
trustee of the Trust with full power and authority to execute
any and all documents in connection with the sale, mortgage,
rezoning or developmont of the Trust Prtato or any part
thereof, including, without limitation, the processing of a
general plan change for the real property legally described as
Lots 1, 2 &a' 7 of Tract $955, Reversion to Acreage, as per
Plat recorded in BooX 74 of Maps, page 20, Records of the
County of San Bernardino, State of California.
Should you have any further questions with respect to
the foregoing, please addreea then to the undersigned at the
above- referenced office.
cry ,
f
J
HICBAEL SILVZR
Sanger, Grayson, Givner t Bookie
WIS/bla
cc: Jean Deukmejian
Pam Morales
John Hawkins
��FIVg� yAR
Q051 5%
.�LSr n.nauuL L.wL .uncelc
Ias,> vt�ruu Louuvuu. wrt[ eoD
nLwu LnV ro
wrn LtQ
[MCJ.O GNI,OIM.. 91UfY6i
Encino
W iOYfM INLlLL WYL
nur xulr.L c.lnonlu
nunlowu uu1 �>vm
Izu, m•m
dna
amL.
nunL>.[ error rxtrm
T[LLCM[L Ybl )L}Jpe
OYL Iqr MO
D4600 -000
March 4, 1986
James Markman, Esq.
city Attorney Duplicate Via Messenger
Post Office Box 1059
Brea, California 92622 -1059
Re: Deukmejian Fanny Trust
Dear Mr. Markman:
This letter will confirm that in accordance with the
torus and provisions of the reukmejian Family Trust dated March
22, 1979 (the *Trust"), Joan Deukmejian is presently sole
trustee of the Trust with full power and authority to execute
any and all documents in connection with the sale, mortgage,
rezoning or developmont of the Trust Prtato or any part
thereof, including, without limitation, the processing of a
general plan change for the real property legally described as
Lots 1, 2 &a' 7 of Tract $955, Reversion to Acreage, as per
Plat recorded in BooX 74 of Maps, page 20, Records of the
County of San Bernardino, State of California.
Should you have any further questions with respect to
the foregoing, please addreea then to the undersigned at the
above- referenced office.
cry ,
f
J
HICBAEL SILVZR
Sanger, Grayson, Givner t Bookie
WIS/bla
cc: Jean Deukmejian
Pam Morales
John Hawkins
��FIVg� yAR
Q051 5%
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE- Fecruary 19, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Lisa liininger, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENYIROOVITAL ASSESSMEYT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-0IA
request to wend the Lan Used a Map of Lhr
eenG�ra Plan from Low Density Residential (2-4 du /a') to
Low Ildium Density Residential (4 -8 du/ac) for 13.55 acres
of land located on the south side cf Feron Boulevard
between Archibald and Turner Avenues - APN 209 - 055 -02, 03,
14.
I. BACKGROUND: The applicant requested a Gene, el Plan Aamli et fray
LmenTfy Residential (2-4 du /ac) to Low Madiimi Density
Residential (4-8 du /ac) for a 13.55 acre site located in the Noah
Tom neighborhood of Rancho Cucmonga. A previous General Plan
application for this site which requested an increase in density to
Medium Density Rzsideitial (4 -14 du /ac) was denied by the City
CoueLll in December 1985. The attached Planning Commission report
provides rare detailed information relative to this item.
II. AANNING 1ISSIOR ACTION: The major issues considered by the
Is and nfng �-= ss on at r January 22, 19x6 hearing were land use•
compatibility and consistency with the goals and policies or the
General Plan.
The Planning Commission determined that the Change to Lou Medium
Density would not create signficant land use incompatibility, oith
existing single family development surrounding the site. Issues
regarding comatibillty of housing type in the 4-8 War. range with
the Predominantly single family detached bc-% -s in the neighborimd,
could be resolved through dasign and site plan review at the
project level.
Additionally, the loCS.iion of the Low Medium Density ;roject withir
a Vie Density area was determined to be consisr rt with e goals
and policies of Oa General Plan by •encoura :r^ ;,-w'xy housing
diversity without changing the single family haracter of tie•
surrounding residential nefghborh000.' Thus, the proposed Change=
appears to be consistent with the General Plan if the single family
character of the r._tghborbood is preservr., by use of a - :apatible•
project type.
.DOS
- 1X&
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Dd
GPA86 -01A - HAWKINS
February 19. 1986
Page 2
III. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Comnissicn recommends approval of the
General an 9endment and issuance o! a Aegative Declaration. If
the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of
Approval
eolution would be appropriate.
attached. Should the Council not concur, a
It should also be noted that the :ity Attorney advised staff and
tie applicant that prior to Council approval, additional
documentation would be required indicating the applicant is
authorized to act on behalf of pr %,arty owner. As of this writing,
this documentation has not been received. Unless satisfactory
documentation is received prior to the hearing, this item should be
continued.
Rtfully3ybml ,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:Lil:ko
Attachments: Planning Coam1ssion Staff Report, January 22, 1"86
Minutes of January 22. 198E Planning Commissinn Meeting
Resolution of Approval
Resolutior of Denial
DO&
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 22, 1A6
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Lisa Mininger, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -OIA
MWKINa - A request to amend the Land use Napo the
�eneraTMan from Low Density Residential (2-4 du /ac) to
Low Redium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres
of land located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, east
of Archibald - APN 209- 055 -02, 03, 14.
ABSTRACT: A General Plan Amendment 1s requested from Low Density
ASfUential to Low Medium Density Residential for a 13.55 acre
site located in the North Town neighborhood of Rancho Cucamonga
(see Exhibit •A•). The applicant previously requested General
Plan Amendments to Medium -High Density Residential and to Medium
Density Residential, which were denied by the Planning Commission
and City Council after review of the Environmental Impact Report
and discussion regarding land use compatibility issues. At this
meeting, the Commission will receive public input and consider the
General Plan Amendment to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8
du /ac).
ii. BACKGROUND: The project applicant, John Hawkins, has requested a
Te—ne—raTTTan Amendment from Low Density Residential (2-4 du /ac) to
Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) In 1984, the
applicant submitted a request for General Plan Amendment 84 -03A
from Low to Medium High Density Residential. After preparation of
an EIR as required by the Commission, it was determined that the
approval of the application would create significant environmental
impacts which could not be mitigated. In addition, significant
land use compatibility problems were noted. The Amendment was
denied by the Commission, appealed to the Council, and to June
1985, denied by the Council. In September, 1985, the applicant
submitted an application for General Plan Amendment 85 -04D for a
change to Medium Density Residential. The application was denied
by the City Council in December 1985 or, the grounds that the land
use change was inconsistent with the policies of the General Plan
relating to the land use compatibility and transition of
density. The applicant has now resubmitted at a lower denisty
rat.ge.
C ITEM N
PL4'iN1NG C0114ISSION STAFF REPORT
General Plan Amendment 86 -OIA
January 22, 1986
Page 2
III. P.n.CJZCT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested* Environmental Assessment per the attached
Initial Study and consideraticn of the General Plan Awndaent.
B. Location. South side of Feron Boulevard, between Archibald and
urnT er.
C. Parcel Size: 13.55 acres.
D. Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential.
E. Existing Land Use: Vacant.
F. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Rmcho Cucamonga Middle School designated Low
Density Residantfal (24 du /acs.
South - AT b SF Railroad right of way and winery, designated
Industrial Specific Plan.
East - Single family homes, designated Low Density
Residential (2-4 du /ac).
Nest - Single family homes, designated Low Density
Residential (211 du /ac).
G. General Plan Designations:
North - Low Density Residential.
South - General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan).
East - Low Dens4ty Residential.
Nest - Low Density Residential.
H. Site Characteristics: The site lies at the terminus of a
drainage c anne w t a small drainage course traversing the
center of the site in a north -scuth direction. A large portion
of the site lies within the 100 year flood plain and is subject
to periodic flooding. Vegetation consists of a raw of
Eucalyptus trees along Feron, scattered trees, shrubs and
grasses. Feron Blvd. provides direct access to the site, with
Main Street dead - ending into the site on the east and west
property boundaries.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The final EIR for General Plan
en ent scusses potential environmental tayacts for
four alternative land uses for the site; Low, Low Medlua, Medium
and Mixed Use. The discussion of Low Medium Density stated that
this alternative represented no significant impacts. Based on the
PLANNING COMMISSION STAfF REPORT
General Plan Amendment 86 -01A
January 22, 1986
Page 3
conclusion of the attached Initiai Study and the EIR, staff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for General Plan
Amendment 86 -01A.
Y. GENERAL PLAN ANENWENT ANALYSIS: The mayor issues to be
cons er regard ng s app cation are land use compatibility
of the proposed density with existing development and consistency
with the goals and policies of the General Plan.
In the Low Medium Density range of 4 -8 du /ac, devile -z nt could
theoretically occur with housing types in a single family, zero
lot line, duplex, or low rise townhouse -type pattern. Since the
surrounding area is developed with older, single family detached
homes with densities up to approximately 6 units per acre,
development in this range could be compatibly, with existing
development. Development at the higher end of the 4-8 unit range
could create some incompatibility with surrounding development.
However, this concern can be addressed through appropriate design
and site planning at the project level to assure compatibility and
proper transition.
The General Plan states that Low Medium Density is 'characterized
by residential densities somewhat greater than the Low Density
Residential group.• It states that Low Medium Density would be
appropriate within low density areas to encourage greater housing
diversity without changing the single family character of the
surrounding residential neighborhood. Therefore, it appears that
development of the site at a Low Medium Density 1s not
inconsi,.tent with the goals of the General Plan, provided that the
single family nature of the area 1s preserved by use of a
compatible project type.
Vt. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of
e General Plan Ame dment, determine that the change from Lae
Density Residential to Medium Density Residential would promote
the land use goals of the General Plan, and that tFi si�imendment
world not be materially Injurious to the adjacent properties, the
TFUNig findings are necessary on approval:
A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of
the General Plan, and;
B. The Amendment promotes goals of She Land Use Element, and;
C. The Aoendmeuc would not be materially injurious to the adjacent
properties.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
General Plan Amendment 86 -01A
January 22, 1986
Page 4
VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
niche 6aii�Re art and notices were sent to all property owners
wit n eet of the boundary of the proposed property, in
addition to other Interested area residents. A 4 foot by 8 foot
supplemental notification sign has also been erected on -site.
VIII. RECOMMENDATION: Should the Commission determine that the required
acts or n ings can be met, adoption of the attached Resolution
of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be
appropriate. Should the Commission determine that the Facts for
Findings cannot be met, a Resolution of Denial 1s also attached.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
88:LW:ko
Attachments: Exhibit •A" - Vicinity Map
Initial Study
Resolution of Approval
Resolution of Dental
QID
MEDIUM
LpNV a,i. :i ,,SCHOO-L SITE
lit t
� I•
_J.
i
—_'�_'. —__ _ • �.? �iiww: v..:�«L:3:.�.Fri }'• +:i {ii�:�i:; :;.may: —
AlA -: MNNM\ VMV:Y.IY:Tl1•.1•:'.•�::- :•�;�y'
•I
.I
:r.
A I
V` : GENERAL. IND.USTRIAL�
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
NORTH
CITY OF rmm, 6Zd 9iL:_om
O CUGAMONGA nRANC uqm
PLANNING DIVISION EXHII3Pn _"�" SCALE.
DRAFT EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 22, 1986
N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -OIA - HAWKINS - A
tal (2 -4 du /ad to Low Medium Densi`v Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for
res of land located on the south sioe of Feron Boulevard, east of
d - APN 209 - 055 -02, 03, 14.
Brad Buller, City Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Commissioner Barker asked if the project was a market rate project, could the
developer come in with a request for a bonus thereby increasing the density.
Mr. Buller replied that a 25% density bonus could be possible which would
increase the number of units from 8 to 10. He additionally advised that this
would be an issue addressee by both the Planning Commission and the City
Council, if requested by the applicant.
Chairman Stou` opened the public hearing.
Tracy Tibballs, 10522 Wilson, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission on
behalf of the applicant. Mr. Tibballs acknowledged that the 25% density bonus
Issue for affordable housing if requested would be addressed by the Planning
Commission and City Council at a later date. He requested approval of the
General Plan Amendment from Low Density to Low Medium Density.
Nacho Gracia, 10364 Humboldt, Rancho Cucamonga, supported the amendment and
stated that he was happy to finally see the density reduced to an appropriate
level.
Commissioner Barker asked if Mr. Gracia understood that the density could come
in at 10 with a density bonus for affordable housing.
Mr Gracia replied that he would like to see what that would mean on a site
plan, since he was not sure how that would affect the number of dwellings
constructed.
There were no further commants, therefore the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner McNiel stated that this was the density which was established as
the one most suited for this parcel and was glad to see it finally reduced to
that level.
Commissioner Chittea stated that 4 -8 is acceptable and could be compatible;
however, was concerned with compatibility should the density increase to 10
under a density bonus.
Commissioner Rempel was concerned with the development of condominiums or
apartments in this area of the City. He stated that this type of product is
inherently incompatible with the area due to surrounding uses such as the
school on one side and the railroad on the other; therefore, could not support
the amendment. He suggested that the project be developed under the terms of
a Development Agreement.
Q14
Commissioner Barker agreed that 4 -8 units per acre is ai appropriate density
for this parcel; however, was concerned with developaent at 10 units per acre
under a density bonus.
Chairman Stout stated ttat he had not changed his opinion that 4-8 units per
acre is an appropriate tensity for the parcel. He indicated to the developer
that when the Comissior expresses strong concerns regarding compatibility at
higher than 8 units pei acre this issue will come up in the design phases,
therefore strongly urp:d the applicant to consider this concern in their
building program.
Commissioner Chitiea asked if there was a way to tie a development agreement
to the land use amendment.
Mr. Markman replied that a development agreennt replaces zoning not the
General Plan designation; therefore, could not be applied to the land use
amendment. Mr. Markman indicated that before this project goes before the
City Council documentation would be necessary to indicate that the people
signing the application are authorized to control the land use on the
property. He advised that if this documentation is not rece'ved, I. would be
necessary for the City Council to continue consideration of this item until it
is received.
Motion: Moved by WNW, seconded by Stout, carried to recommend issuance of
a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Resolution approving Environmental
Assessment and General Plan Amendment 86 -01A, Hawkins, to the City Council.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUT, BARKER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEL
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried
Q13
C.p..K 5/ /a cv--k .
RESOLUTION NO. 86-69
A RESOLUTION or THE CITY COUNCM DP T83 CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMOCGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN A"DMENT N0.
86 -GIA - WKlBS REQUESTING AN AMGNDMRNT TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT 07 IUN RANCHO CUCAMONCI. GGNERAL PLAN FROM LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DO /AC) TO LOW MEDIOM DPNSITI
'lESIDWIAL (A -8 DU /AC) FOR 13.55 ACRES Or ND LOCATED ON
PERCH BOULEVARD EAST Or ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 209 -035 -02,
03, a 14
WHEREAS, tLe Planning Commission held a duly advertised public
bearing on January 22, 1986 to consider all comments an the proposed General
Plan Ansaduent No. 86 -0IA; and
V�OlEA9, the City Council bald a duly advertised public bearing to
consider all comments on the proposed Gauural Plan Amendment Not 86 -0IA;
fldingae SZCSTDLLt The Rancho Cucamonga City Ccuucil r.4D make the following
A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan.
B. Tbs Ameatatat promote, goals of the Land Ua9 Element.
C. Thn Amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent psopertiaa.
f of lwn E[CILM it The General Kao Land Use Map $ball be amended as
APB 209 -035 -02. 03 and 14 shall be CLaoged from Law Deniity
Residential (2-4 du,ac) to Lou Radium Density Residential
(4 -8 du /ac).
SECTION it A Negative Declaration is bereby adopted based upon the
completion and findings of the Initial Study.
NON, THEREFORE, SS IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucawcga City
Council hereby approve, General Plan Amendment No. E6-01A.
PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this a day of a, 196.
;—;) /t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Qatar
March 36, 1986 L9A
Tor
City Cmncll and City manager
Pronr
Jim Pesedettl, Assistant Park Planner
Subjects
AMAPD OF COATRACT FOR DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING 6TRL_ ;'J
LOCATED ON THE NERhMA PARR SITP.
Consent Calendar Item •A-
Bids were race. red frog four bidden for the above referenced demolition
protact. The local bid mounts are an follows,
Shooter c Butte, Inc.
$ 91500.00
Century Demolition Company
$ 9,800.00
Falcon Demolition, Inc.
$10,600.00
Laird Construction, Inc.
$11,500.00
A 8UMWrY of each bid proposed Is attached for your review.
RECOMMENDATION,
That the City Council award the Contract to Shooter 4 Batts, Inc., as the
lowest, qualified bidder on this project for the bid amount of $9,500.00
and authorise funding of the fall contract amount Plus contingency from
Park Development Fund.
CD/15,
—,a,_ 6 T��J,
Reply To Ccpova He=IX=,am
Q T�V�o�•Mas�lhev CO [f�'+oSGOLI•StYLCersBy3„YaCStI •(6gi; "'�
Li TG40Ff�w�c ♦Tfl5u�e218.Orxb+M.pSt C�4raa42270•(b�3CSF.,Z7'D
II - 25. 2986
sl=ez ly. l
!� A � v
Edw=d A_ T&m- -A. -.rr
Pm7e=
0
e
o
0
:r O
U1 °
v �
r.
rA.
44
T
`
1J1y••Q
•
r
e jA
J gip �����//jj p
Tom Y':�iaRVm
FL !DT f � /� y (,
r�! « 0�
r.
fPd I YD1_e� Qi
All
(a pip
r i�,is 1 CENTURYDEMOLITION COMPANY
tO 4 P. O. Box 163
0( ttLtr Llaram Pomomt Cal((omla 91769
C21- 41Q511 7141622 -5601
PROPOSAL&
In consideration for payment as described in paragraph three
below, Century Demolition Company, hereafter referred to as 'Con-
tractor,- agre•is to perform demolition service et the following
site location:
6707 H6FUbSA AVZ5VE IS rn CITY CP IW.,CIO CUCA=.,CA
Such demolition services as described are requested by and
for the benefit of CITY OF RAMC :', CUCA,"OROA
hereafter roforred to as: 'Purchaser
1. Description of ServiCea& DEVOLISH AND REMOVE P°O)4 °ITE SIVCLE
PAMLY DrLLIM TO I'XIXDE RMOVAL OF ALL STRUCTUPES, SLA-3. ASP -ALT
QD CONVMTS YALIWAYS, I.VTLRIOR PLCCI.VO. LILY POSO,_$ISC. DSBRIS, TRESS
A.VD SLRUSS, TPEES- 1AONCLIA J610 PALM -TO RErAIS (,9 DEZI :7ATED DY CITY).
!LOVE IN-0ROUND SWIIM113 PDOL, SUPPLI DTIr. COPPACT BACIPILL AREA ',0
90S DDENSI:Y, COIAIPPACTIO3 MOM' TO OE PROVIDCD TO CITY AT teyn&C -OR EIPS4SE.
I7nless5 otherwise notelrf beowaLil buildings, improvements,
attachments, and all materials resulting from demolitions
and/or removal shall become the property of the Contractor.
Purchaser warrants that no other party has either a legal or
egaitable fntetest in a&ly of the improvements on the property
and that purchaser hat the legal authority tr give such pro-
perty to the Contractor and further Purchases agrees to indem-
nify and hold Contractor harmless from any claims by third
parties for the removal of the improvements on the property
described herein.
2. Property to be retained by purchaser
3 ��1r16�k FF_�t/,i= hND Pn[�_S �l'exd�rl AfPG�.Wn
s
5F1MP1044 Yoe& AjCP.a)
Page 1 of 2
--)-/ e
a.
3. Contractor agresa to perform the above described services for
the sum or NT}�ugAn'7 -2I I^ r�f7�PL0
Dollars (S_ 9ffb m ) with payments to be made
_ _._.911 ccnac.^rTOx
The enngtfi�re amount of the contract price to be paid within
t oni from theayabovetsppecifications invoolving alteration
extra oostawill
only be executed upon written orders for same, and will become
an extra charge over the stus in this contract. All agreements
must be in writing.
Without acceptance this proposal will nit be valid after 05 days.
NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER
If IL an net pad in sets 61 tiro tabor "mim, equip
e "t ar mararWt hmIMN er V be (erafMed, • m•
disom Om e, -41 V Me bear, through mart tore.
dawn pnuNiap, of W tar pan of year pnperry buy
re L"I mM mar be Field sWora W ''@parry one
IAmgb you ben put rear metnnar Y t.F You auto
"A to pretest yourself 81,102 •Ld unnutw by 111
ragaRrel Yam actuanor to tumhs a ei)nN "I'm by
a, Prase er thn omy you this "able boon mMn1
Faymnt " your ".tram, " (2) try 81141 "read
or dmi Mk► d appropriate Yad,, he pmmce=
CONTRACT:
CENTURY DEt10LITI0N CO,4;JANy
By
Date TA'10AR2 31 19 E,6
Contractors are requ.red by law
to be licenn ^d and regulated by
the CONTRACTORS- STATE LICENSE
801" -RD• Any questions concerning
a contractor may be referred to
the registrar of the board whose
address is:
CIntractorsr State License Board
3132 Bradshaw Road
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 26000
Sacramento, CA 95826
Telepllcnor (915) 366 -5153
You ate hereby authorized to furnisT all eguipmont and labor to
complete the above listed work. IME agroa to pay the amount
specified in said proposal according to terms thereof, together
with reasonable attorneys fees and court costs incurred by
Contractor should legal action oo undertaken to enforce any of
the terms and conditions of this contract.
./ Accepted by:
t^ Qai�G
Page 2 of 2
a -6
'ir
knoli6aie
tnG �
JanudAy 20, 1986
Uty o6 Rancho Cucamonga
Coeeumc ty Se4v.ice6 DepdAbnent.
P. D. Sox 907
Rancho Cucamonga, Catt6aRn44 91730
ATTENTION: Jun Benedetto
RE: DenO:.ctcon and Atte eteWV -" O6 6797 Henm06a Avenue, Rancho CutamoKSa, CA
Dean Jun:
AA pet your .equal.. Fateon DemotAt on, Inc., to eubmotUng a LUNP SM PRICE
o6 $ 10,600.00 to aemove a 4,ting Atiuctiue6 and vegetation at the above ne6eJi-
.eneed aUe.
THE PRICE IACLUDESe
1. Removat and haut Quay o6 "4 t ng Wcetd<n96 and "wetunea
2. Removat and haul array o6 concrete &tab6, 6oating6 and wathoayd
J. Removat and haul mlay o6 poot and pout decking.
{. Sack6EU 06 pool (not to be a cectc64ed 6ittl.
S. Removat and haul may e5 ttee6, ehuu66 and deb&a.
6. Removat O6 leptcc .tank.
7. Removat o6 chain t4nA 6ence6
S uahctczation.
9. Dap Feca.
THE PRICE MUTES:
1. UU&ty D+awnnect6.
2. Perm".
J. T.eeb (Z Patma and 1 Maggot& to eeo ).
0. 4na66e6 oven exUAe ei,te.
S. fupectc4n6
Shoutd you have any quutcan6 o4 nequtne addit4onat 4A6oneatwn, do not Wi,tate
to cast.
610
K
45—
etTnztle Fnoet
Da s: idswf
M?A ib+146uebY. n CWmdp4 CA e1M • al0Wang
LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Genes) En91findnp Contactor
9460 LUCAS RANCH ROAD . RANCHO CUCAMONOA CA 9173015797
('14)9896595
January 15, 1966
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Rd.
Rancho Cucamouga, Q% 91130
Attention: Jim Benedetti
Project: 6787 Hercosa Ave., city of Baneho Cucamonga, CA
n eexrwnw uc Na pan:
.tcaNre.na uc «o wu
• ee.oeoxsmucnoN
GMD1M
coNC
HEAW RE E
• FAW EW.M6NT IIFMAI
Gentleaan:
We are pleased to submit our bid ou the above referenced project:
1. Rconve ow (1) each house, two (2) each garage, and mist. trees
Lump Sum $11,500.00
Q(AI.IFIGITIONS: n
(a) See U bit A Tern and Conditions attached.
If bid is accepted, please complete the fol.3 rdng information (per
,ection 3097 California Code of Civil Procedure), sign and return one copy.
OU:IFA
ADDRESS
CONSTRDCTION LENDER
ADDRESS
GM3LAL CCNTRACTOR
ADDRESS
SIGNED BY DATE
JBL:3d
30 days /4 -30-86
attaehsant
Respectfully subml�ted,
Ocx CfR75 CTIO'7 INC.
sAnket Lai
\ eary
ry
aai
wa Clxmuer[nl M. W.
M•.IT •A
TT[ett atatnl+r
L oep tntdnt• wcn. u. ..... .mtr.eetnt Via ut" Cbo— t-11. G.. Inc. b • {e-nal,'ar .r .vbcm-
.ru[er, [em .r•q r"mu. to 'Pe•t• •gall M tm.ervN to "" .mh {m.nl. Va.• " •ebcmctu.or.
Mrf n(.rmu h.nm [o Yena[N[vi teal b• cmurv" I. do. W" GutLU[tm Co.. tad.
"aceen yfy.[.�Cmt e-1 a ale. to ANY aa1 bA -4., -NI. w ti cca: VAN. o,. �• `rV1 e•,•.u. ma ' 0. [Rea
mfr that cmtrua lee let. le to
• toms ebaa Mae- hll. b VAN. u/ Pl+••
.f bt. cmtl.[t.
I. T•m• a! .r t teal e. e- falln..n 11 C, 91 N .n.., of U. wn wf"Nod at Te", I Crap. at
n. e-f •! ace mete, [. b. old H Cw.' 4 OenbuNr of [MellawrvvrNee) {brte.lr.col All c.ewr..•o dv a.
ce e• 1.14 n[nb U to,. atRr c.ml.am H
E•mmdu •dnbn u. m[ Pid Mm N. atoll N.[ lnbnat a [M r.[o at boa. lit PnuL P[ torch im[ll 'old.
I. u the event sett d.favu .hots mot u N..•p..t of W go edcb Rte- br of to .•.• .!•nel•tMnts.
.s[•.. .. P) CmVNNr•. ne-m.el• w...Y !w ." In[t canto la..mt H CYatrmtar to mlbK. PP••
• hslutron.-. IM. coon"[ doe- net SeciWn
•. Ma• e-uu•1 wdar emeto[..
\. !,{banns 0.m cs. Nll trim{ nA Inq.ctb. Ides.
roue ".do to. I'd" AN et r..HV one-.
a. ttaluy ar Urvcurvl ocnuam nd /er Nctelll.
Cent of I•mr end /.r Ndotmna boat.
! smon{ ens FCNm.
S. Awune{ ar rv"m [entrol.
S. 4nh.aib to Wood- m .R•. Load"" Mt[vv or ea9.n" .v t. H cu. Add ..root
.. Gcmt rs.tltln.[ Ll.et wrl H It. and c....tal ml.0 ga[lttulH la[IW.a to vnraui.
I Y.[•r to N fumt.Md .t 1ob.tt• O'lot Lo {pate{.
I. t
•. hopaul .n. .o[ 1nIW. e-: wrA en Ytf lltN• as urvc[vrev NieY {nwd Yaeb91 "ve-d t•
alb ln1Y.N to 9ropce-l. An) "My wn nnitod al Gan.t[or In cmMCam ebevMb. 1
lutn[N. .bua soon Gatuctor'.
s. lac.fill 01.d.0 H IM. n N tort" bat .90MN ata n• to[!Na inter• H
,"'Vodt r :.u[Im. b.{b.
I. TAM (Il+ Add Wu[laU rltl N cNged e- f.IttV..
•. Aa eeR lncl "n{ .[Ytr•anI a[ tortma .tulv.m. alto t•bbr ud .at.11al .In in or m•m.N Na IV
Gr 'refit
la. It a auYV.dT Mo. n boar bill .tto N. uto wutticfNo b•leeb. vVV, Vd•r- •nRUntatln[ l-r.dAdd nit'
01.. toy o aDirev. p1
.bl•. bI ^•c. oar•, T l N wn . b• do N.rd NO Qrn.r ct[N. to drnrt tE. "'k.n .. ndo H Gnnunr'l rvi[.-
.nu[Ire.
1.
.1 •l [NI.S b[ dnd /er ell• R.dlet end Lln. t[Nln{ to .L u[ns•d H tM•[ Otlor t. .n) tom [ry
etn H bum. :mrtrveuen e1 o[ev WIt ontrv• unteuu of lo[ bl[a uu .
11. r . [tr• t•-n An) wrE [.•.t," of Ceetsr.tor to Wfon toruotn w[. cr." H, or --8 [.• Ue n.n-
Itm. d( .eMn er n[a bt rod Y111 M dm. an T A n. 4 -30-tl6
e 1. [ agL[N H ben adw "Vv oe.r eb.11 e. n"Attla. ter .nI . •11 dc run. la aural ntoa
11. Se. Plc.. tot to" 1. "1. ern[ o M." .". th. lob b.l•{ eb.9lm )
If b. Ir m [ w bcurtN H CVn, ...... .eln IVCre-... Ieall N oat
I.ber .au.. ..vnrme n[ev, or ant CO. cow and •qm
ton. Id Gnnntei • ttrvlu. aW 0.1. H tots to .eaeNaus. V(eh n. e.[r 9rVVtdod t. Pnp.ie 1 .NV.• a[Ib.o
it• Se. ...w ..I (ere to ebn cm .... t d c 1.0 upon m. .n. -ln t.[ •Ne of n. Cod.m •r'• [tow oWr
IS. Ie. Olio. uL Intl 1. 01.a[.r.t
,,yo,, V,11 tIt.r.."Idmlr It aEb emtuat N uuplN H oun.r YRns
an
Is. Tm:rR[ r call boa. m 1101ILH and 1. hereby tole-`o"ddby . or �•u•v oburvct`m MC .nub f"'
to, or bto.dal. of • w......u.d 'b..
IN. wfu• 01 u• Read. d to. c[tel bt oetru[at•
0. Any doe-{• ..... ba" H toy 1•a.m or sa "t -lm bqe. m
[ (CYnenuN w tnn•• slab)
QDO
MINT "0 - Treed W Coadinan• (feetd.)
12. pei.0 rneMe. ratified , Or ass •fine* IT". Wall me. in., &. "r on KOO me -t.W •f • tat Pia.
as .read I. finish wh["e. ad din Kll Nl.r. 4 rtes a.... will N Wa ter .) doeu. dLK p
q". w7y
—Y. e[ 1,11 b.lht In.
K.oll, Ike eadirten-I ecce KII be prforW onlaao It "'cm[Gy N ales -t 11 Qaar or by Any wtN[K.d arsr-
O pr. ..I of C.e.r, It Inn., refu•r to nm . Mast. P"r for art[. "a, r tnns. .... eld. the es,,, AS
ado *.a, .hall �) U m c of :.We' "Gesalc.4 I'Slen uad era KtNUt • Wife- choose erdr, It Say do ee
PGtI.. swaps[ a" Ile IO praaa far maps" and l0 IKCre Sac
It. Ceatmta[ to me G.pn.m. for deal..,* or ea ..ew.ne hllurn L .r.. KW Sees 1... (1) Seneca
toil
"' dad halt Wu&. for •11-9.4 "Pert) 4.0&. decd AT C tr.ctav will net be hpgesd Salads b meP
ft" .e urlt1nS and also.. 1. unalni 4 Nees less, to an,, [rain being W-.
2.. Mf.v.t C tractor Shell be excu." for ens del" in csglatm of Wtd yndo.ec two" by .G at fM L
.l"l,s. We me tire" to K ". .W. flood, snn. Ided.M.. subsidence And earthquake. days of . et uSe•
shat gets atroltor- egley" by Ueda,; acts at pabll. uclittlo. Or lrelev.tai or publl. best" or Sit .,a.,l ataes.l
Ske.PS. labor evacuate, tabor •Ion daunt, .Mb.. Seta •delKp ..S,S . r "maim W Redose, 1. it a; taoml-
tloa. blq a [renpen.es.; char o"ecea 1. We wife fallen• of Pn1. W nuts. "pant. . Ceatrata[ r ra-
.dr" odor I" .,r..ar ee Olney .woe. kayoed tN reasonable cancel of "a tractor, my of tables *hall wtmti-
..Ily -title morales td roren.ale e[ .r.rrm rten-ta of W. carters. "to at roe once• ocd an a h ttl.bl.
"Ju...c of the controls Prin to cmpar.W contractor for all ran W oneness of "dlclasl A act Sam a
ars,Patr or "tons' And wend" eldcea" rnulelol ha enT Such delay.
32. site e..,aee lean Ip. wce bond" tar tt soh'. .ever.[ 1. hr" apes Wa Pl.v wed Lsr bladWg end Nab
ace <oMl.An helot a nruect" ay Wad* plena, me User Kll tern end pine at the prep..", lt... to W
Cmernt., end provide . tics." lo" samaycr'• n "n Sea .'. It •pad..ay, Ceade.ecr ..tae. m re.boo.lbllle,
ace Ilabtlim for " oIssy- a.. r d..&.. rad.War I. or solo•" to site, 0011 or .umerf.• .WGtom Imp "led,
but rc limit" G. degree of cantle•, ground eager, psoal-tint Oscar. deal..&.. cecta, filled {Toms, eatable
Pound.:o"onrta. ".alre •ell or arch gemrat f[a a) awn .p- Gema[, or tab, any ease else Send
an
Won r ",eve e s . the taw of WI annum of W/• rantract. Clear Proceeds at bolo o a Kent, We end 1[ See
NN non ad . •l. tale aaSe.e, retain W. nret.a. of aonr.t .ell- consultants to tan..l&.sa doLSelol ac"letoea
and We acv sell&.. t.- nn saoni.. ace pgrfon attar lose., beem.1. Wee. .halt "p N 4.ed W half! !10
contract or cab llJ,a. additional trVlr Wnrl . the Cp.er.Gr.
it denni the cuun0 at ca.tmatla h.ra Adar, my of "a .e "{tlong ester[" td heel" •hold be encounter ",
Gres Contvctor -hall .... on[. hassled., tit% nnGlees", -ear -psr hold N. We y the Pee, KW the
C.tracnt for ant done .Pecos Incurred at to N I.mre.d by reason of Sold cads G:n.. SAO Additional roe •rpm.
,hall be at doer lo eye .,n rat Payable ee eat fanb In W- Ser.,uPb am.rotn9 .cads wad! harela.
2). LtCIS sle uent :e lrtal r.Nlrwtt. act.. 1. Nr•ay ice. chat coac[.nn era resulted by lm to be
Sit
.no" a en r.related h the Coaer.m['. Sure Means* N-". My "-setae ueeaUlm, o n.r.eeor h be
nhmd to the both..•. of in. boo" Sun address Is ee Solid", Cmrs"to,
'. Sera 4c... U.N. 1071'2•
fG..c. Gclw.ts Cat3 foe.-.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL GENERAL PLAN REVISIONS
I. BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of March 20, 1986, the
ssuT a of potential General Plan revisions was discussed by the City
Council. Staff was requested to come brck with a report outlining
options available to the City Council and addressing the
feasibility and perceived need for changes to the General Plan.
This report provides the information requested, and outlines
staff's perspective of the General Plan, element -by- element.
II. ADMINISTRATIVE REVISIONS: Revisions to the General Plan are
already on the work program. However, staff's intention was simply
to address issues of administrative nature. This would involve an
update of the document to reflect all Policy changes and decisions
made since adoption of the document in 1981, and removal of
superfluous language. This administrative update would also
include a general cleanup of the document, to assure internal
consistency among the various elements. Finally, an update of the
General Plan EIR was anticipated Li give us a more meaningful
document which cuuld serve as a master EIR for future decisions.
The use of the document as a master EIR would eliminate the need
for at least some future EIR's associated with individual projects
or decisions, and would simplify the environmental review process
In general.
The administrative update, involving no major policy changes, would
involve mostly staff work and relatively limited review by the
Planning Commission and the City Council. This level of review
would take approximately seven person weeks of staff time for the
General Plan, and additional three to four weeks of staff work on
the EIR, with the bulk of the FIR work to be contracted out to
environmental specialists.
Mr
I Land Use I
Circulat'j,i I
Housing I Land Use
Public Facilities Development
I Community Design i
Open Space Envirormental
Resources
Energy Conservation
j Seismic Safety I
I Safety I--. Public Health
Noise Safety
�. Figure 1 -3
GENERAL FLAN ORGANIZATION
0
L I
0
Handatory Element
Optional Element
Super - Elements
aas
EXHIBIT °R "•
CITY COUNCIL STAFP REPORT
Potential General Plan Revisions
April 2, 1986
Page 2
III. POLICY REVISIONS:
In addition to revisions of purely administrative nature, Council
directed staff to look at potential changes in areas of policy as
well. Exhibit •A' illustrates organization of the General Plan.
The foll.iwing is an outline of existing General Plan elements, and
a brief description of each:
A. Land Use and Oavelopment /Super Element:
1. Land Use Element: This is the most often amended
e ement o t e General Plan, reflecting both
privately initiated and City initiated - mendments
for specific parcels of land. Last year alone, we
processed 12 such requests. In addition, in August
of 1985, the City Council considered more sweeping
changes to the General Plan and elected not to
proceed with any revisions at the time. The options
considered were:
a) site specific land use revisions in specified
areas in the community,
b) reconsideration of density designations
Citywide, and
c) revisions if land use through modifications to
land use categories Citywide.
Staff will need specific direction if policy changes
to the Land Use Element are to be considered.
2. Circulation Element: This element will require
su stant a administrative revisions. In addition,
results of currently ongoing Citywide traffic study
may warrant policy changes as well.
3. Housin Element: This is a relatively new element,
adopted y the City in 1989. No changes are
mandated to this element until 1989. At this point,
staff sees no need to update the element, outside of
minor administrative changes as outlined in the
previous section.
4. Public Facitittes Element: Substantial
adm n strat ve c anges will e necessary in this
section to deal with past decisions in the areas of
_ Parks and Recreation, park acquisition, civic
facilities, etc. No policy level changes are
anticipated.
M
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Potential Gtner,l Plan Revisions
April 2, 1986
Page 3
S. Com unit Desi n Element: Through the development
o an agress ve rev ew process over the past five
years, the City has been able to develop a better
understanding of its design values, community
identity, and other design related issues. Staff
sees the need to formalize this knowledge through
substantial restructuring of this element. Council
direction in this area is requested.
B. Environmental Resources Su er Element: This super element
nc u es onservat on, en- space, and Energy Conservatinn
elements. Outside of administrative revisions, no major policy
changes are anticipated.
C. Public Health and Safety Suoer Element: This super element
nc u es a sm c a ety, Safety. an o se elements. Outside
of administrative revisions, no major policy Granges are
anticipated.
Iv. SUK4ARY /PEC014MEHDATIOH: The administrative update as proposed by
star is re at ve y minor in scope. and only eleven person weeks of
staff time revisions. If the 1Councaidl to o dshtotinitiatermajorl0 licydlevel
revisions to the City's General Plan, staff will need direction on
the scope of these revisions and their priorities, to develop a
realistic work program for the project.
Basic options are outlined below:
1. Administrative Revisions and E1R if only.
2. Adminlstrative Revisions lus conslderatton of olio changes
in soecifled e ements. to wou suggest cons eras an of
policy changes fn ge area of circulation and community
design. If policy changes in other elements are also to be
considered, staff will need appropriate direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:OK:cv
r
tn't -v!�
wr r.
nNi rYmb�a a.nr.�
AY�i tbY.Y w IIm ,
ub-r a. Jr trr1� sIN r rIa tv rwN d
rY Y Y a Y Aaa411 r asaYrYYWa
r Yp.r+.rW tal WI.
VYi pYlr YO�Ir a.YYb`�WYI �pA
LL wa Yt
Ali ra M� �b Y W Ia tra a q I
rwurYY4rllla Yp1a rRM Yr
Iia I � °ula
RO � a�e� � r•Y�
I�Oa��O et
6lri �Y Yd Y N \M.YY•1 Yr14 a Ir
- rr..rralr..I
Plbr sr lYpb- a rrlrw.
AIYY rYlaula llYl lra. Ya�al�alpNra
V Y111rw�•.
6 r•r v � alla Y !I, IIYV Rulb IYI b
YY.
OO �ilsYl ►/a llrt NRlY tM.)
Nor Io•)
YY�faw,A •
)
t Ib i N Yb / IY4Y I V.aaO(Y YYYO I r
�� b Y�Ir YI Il Ian r.
Plbr tafYpb�YrrtYa,
AiY-r w °Iw 4 i
Rvr rRa rr.
Ow rra..w it Nill tY4)
uR w.v ti.
Yrlrr
uiwwl�.Inl�rY,urrr
.W..,YI..°.
PINT
YwRIb �Yawnbt
Yr-f
Y•al a1L (�4 YIIIIN MIrrr1.
R 41•r�
�r w0 4 Rte, Yrl (IYlla IYI 1I
OYMY ia�14r1IVl
NoYI M.1
rIN. A H.M
Y lar : Yb � IYWIr IU.YYJIR bYYrY N M
nrar tIfI�W1Yr1YMOy rY }IMbHYI
aYr rYOr.
s r. r tYNb afar r..u1.
CHRONOLCSY CODC EGFORCflEMT OF THE 9400 BLOCK OF HAMPSHIRE AVENUE
VIOLATION: Maintenance of Open Area - Commercial Zone
04 Feb 86 Joe Torrez, Cade Enforcement Representative, while on
inspection, observed the couth side of the 9400 block of
Hampshire to have a recess area with about one foot of
water. The lot in addition to weed growth was scattered
with trash from lawn clippings, tree triaming, domest4z
discards, auto parts and a motorcycle. Attempt t^ .untait
the responsible parties was initiated.
06 Feb 86 Yap. Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager, contacted Joe
Torrez to inquire if Mr. Jim Green had made contact with him
in reference to trash and stagnant water at a property on
the southeast corner of Helms and Hampshire. Mr. Torrez
stated that Mr. Green had not made contact with him. M-.
Torrez informed Mr. Rizzo that he was already in process of
correcting the problem and he was doing a research for the
property owner in question as well as the other adjacent
properties with similar problems.
Mr. Torrez attempted to contact Hr. Green by telephone that
day, but was not able to make contact.
11 Feb 86 Letters of Notice of "Jolation (17.10.050(D) - Maintenance
of Open Area) Development Code, were sent to all property
owners with a fourteen (14) day period for correction. The
24th of February was set for next inspection date for
compliance.
The following were sent said letters:
f1 Allsize Rancho Cucamonga (9497 Hampshire Stret)
c/o Gary Dapelo
c/o Goad Wildman Hegnes S Valley
5000 Campus Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
02 Frank Workman (9498*Havpshire Street)
2501 Hhittier Drive
LaCrescenta, CA 91214
Original Letter sent to:
640 Glendale Terrace
Glendale, CA
f3 Charler 6 Jacquelyn H. Hughes (9479 Foothill Blvd.)
c/o Forrest Perry
9180 Orange Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
14 Jacquelyn M. Hughe; (9455 Foothill Blvd.)
1101 Fulton Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
05 Levels Development (9377 Foothill Blvd.)
P. U. Box 670
Upland, CA 91786
24 Feb 86 Joe Torrez, Code Enforcement, made a second inspection and
found that no correction had been made.
03 March 86 Joe Torrez issued warning citations to all parties with the
exception of Lewis Development Company. Lewis Development
advised on 13 February that as soon as weather permitted
they would take care of the problem.
11 March 36 violation on property /3 was abated.
01 Apr 86 Citations issued to 02, Frank Workman and 14, Jacquelyn
Hughes by Joe Torrez, Code Enforcement.
!1 Atlsize Rancho Cucamonga (9491 Hampshire Street)
c/o Gary Dapelo
c/o Good Wildman Hegnes & Watley
5000 Campus DrivP.
Newpart Beach, CA 92660
11 Feb 86 1st Notice of Violation (17.10.050(0) Maintenance of Open
Area. 2nd inspection due 24 Feb 1986.
Return receipt: 02- 12 -86.
24 Feb 86 2nd Inspection -- no corrections.
03 Mar 86 Warning Citation !1576 issued.
Return receipt: 03- )5 -86.
11 Mar 86 Mr. John Brewster called to advise that construction shack
would be set up in approximately two weeks with con�truction
to begin within thirty (30) days.
17 Mar 86 Received letter from Mr. Brewster confirming telephone call
on 11 March 1986.
01 Apr 86 Sent letter reminding due date for clean -up or start of
construction is 11 April 1986. No acticn will result in the
Issuance of a citation.
►2 Frank Workman (9498 Hampshire)
2501 Whittier Drive
La Crescenta, CA 91214
al Feb 86 1st Kitice of Violation (17.30.050(D) Maintenance of Open
Are: sent to 640 Glendale Terrace, G1enCale, CA. 2nd
Inspection due 27 February 198b.
24 Feb 86 2nd Inspection -- no corrections.
03 Mar 86 Warning Citation 11577 issued. Letter returned 24 Feb 86 as
"No Such Address'.
01 Apr 86 Letter and notice to appear, issued Citation /0358 by
complaint.
e
43 Charles & Jacquelv.; ;;. Hughes (9501 Foothill 21vd.)
c/o Forrest Perry-
0133 orange Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
i Feb 86 1st Notice of Violation (17.10.(50(0) Maintenance of Open
Area. 2nd inspection due 24 Febrv,ary e6.
24 Feb 86 2nd inspection -- no corrections.
03 Mar 85 Warning Citation #1578 issued.
Return rereipt: 03- 07 -86.
11 Mar 86 Violation abated.
f4 Jacquelyn M. Hughes (9455 Foothill Bivd.)
1101 Fulton Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
11 Feb 66 1st Notice of Violation (17.10.050(D) Maintenance of Open
Area sent. 2nd inspectiol 24 February 86.
24 Feb 86 2nd inspection -- no co,•rections.
11 Mar 86 Returned mail. Envelope indicates mail was refused.
01 Aar 86 Letter and notice to appear, issued Citation }0359 by
complaint.
15 Lewis Development Company (9377 Foothill Blvd.)
P. 0. Box 670
Upland, C4 91736
11 Feb 86 1st Nctice of Violation (17.10.050(D) Maintenance of Open
Area.
13 Feb 86 Received call to advise that they would get to the problem
as soon as weather permitted.
28 Feb 86 Violation abatement started.
CITY OF P.ANCHO CUCAMON,
FEDEVELOFAIENT AGENCY
MEMORANDUM
DATEt April 2, 1986
TO: Chatrmon end Members of the Redevelopm Agency
FROM: Laren M. Wasserman, City Man
BY: Jack Lam, AICP, Dirputy Executive Director
SUBJECT: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PROGRAM
At the Agency meeting on March S, 1986, the board requested staff to
prepare informatio., on business improvement districts. Staff is currently
in the process of collecting Information end reviewing xxlsting business
Improvement districts from other communities that are aimed at enhancing
existing businesses.
Upon receipt and review of these districts, a wspective of existing
proginlns as well as a discussion of various alternative methods will be
presented to the board. A report R anticipated to be ready for tha Agent'
meetlag of May 7, 1986. The report will be descriptive in nature but will
outane the general steps in developing a progran and present the policy
Issues associated with such a program. After the Agcnay's review and
discussion of this report, staff would implement whatever policy direction
the Agency board decides upon.
z•
ORDINAMCE 30. 7eB
02 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDISC SECTIONS
8.12.020, 8.12.030. 8.12.00.C., 8.12.130 AND ADDING
SECTIONS 8.12.200 AND 8.12.210 IO CHmn 8 12 OF IITLE 8
OF THE RANCHO CUCAAMCA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO
FIR1110RES
THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DOES
MEBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SZCTIOH It Section 8.12.020 of the Rancho Cucamooga Municipal Cade
Is hereby amended to road, in words and figures, as follwst
"H.12.926 FiresorlM"'Ifiand.
"A. 'Dangerous fireworks' are thnce defined in Section 12.505
of the California Health and Safety Code, as the same presentlY marts or may
be aeended from rise to time hereafter, sod said dangerous firs works may not
be discharged within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California as the same presently mists or as may be modified from time to time
hereafter, at any time.
"B. 'Safe and $&no Pirworki are those defined in Section
12.504 of the California Health and Safety Code, as the same presantly mists
or as may be amended from time to time hereafter. Safe and sane fireworks may
be discharged within the corporate li to of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
daring the period engiuniug at 12:01 ..m on the tourtb day of July and ending
at 12:01 a.m. on the tatib day of July oI the sass calendar year.
"C. 'Sparkler' includes any deice containing chemical elements
and /or chemical compounds capable of burning independently of the oxygan of the
areas pbere and say be comprised of. but not limited to, devices made of the
following iegredients and having the follovior caPahilities:
"Barium nitrate, aluminum powder (pyrotechnic mixture),
irou pwdet or fine grits, resin, potassium pereblorate and adhered to wire or
wood sateiial and manufactured to burn at a controlled rate of speed."
=TION_2: Section 8.12.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Coda
is hereby Branded to real, in words and figures, as follows,
"11-12,Q10 WC f Fafaaltd Sena Fireworks Per MILW,
"A. The sale of safe and sane fireworks shall only be permitted
in commercial disrricu of the City and such sale $hall be subject to all
applicable state lava and regulations and all unditions specified in this
Chapter 8.12.
R. no person authorised to sell safe and sane fireworks
pursuant tc this rhapter 8.12 shall sell any such fireworks, including safe and
sane firewotks, to a minor under the age of 18 years, unless such minor is
accompanied by bit or bar parent(s) or guardiar.(s).
M
":. The Asia of safe and sane fireworks shall not commence
prior to 12:06 m,on of the tbirtieth day of June and shall ters.ioate at 12101
a.&w on the fifth -y of July of the sane calendar year.
"D. Notwithstanding any other provision of Saw, it shall be
unlawful for any person. fire, partnership or corporation to sell any sparkler,
as that tern is d.Kined in this Chapter 8.12, in any location within the
corporate boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga."
SYCTIOV 3i Sectioa 8.12.010.0 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
is hereby amended to read, in words and figares, as fallws:
"C. period of coverage shall be 12.01 s m., lane 30, or
earlier, to 12101 p.m. July IS, or later, of the Bann calendar year;"
SCCY101 A. Section 8.12.190 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
is hereby amenied to read, to words and figures, is follows:
"8,12,190 X,- 1tv for Vialetien of Qayter.
"It shall be cnlwful for say person, firi, partnership, or
corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the
tcguirements of this Chapter.
A" person, lire, partnership, or corporation violating scy
provision of this chapter or failing to comply with any cf its regmiraa =s
shall be deemed gull" of a mis domaanor and upon conviction thereof shall be
punished by a fine not exceeding Jue Thousand Dollars, or by imprisonment cot
exceeding six &oaths, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Sacb such porter,
firm, partner ship, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate cffeale
for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any
of the provisions of this Cb.ptar is committed, continued or permitted by such
person, fir -, pertnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable
therefor as provided in this Chapter."
SECTION 91 A new Section 8.12.200 is hereby added to Chapter 8.12 of
Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures.
as follouar
"geed en 8.12.200. Civil 2- medi-a Available.
"A violation of any of tha provisions of this Chapter shell
constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by
means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injune tion, or in any
other meaner provided by low for the abatement of such nuisance."
SaCTIOO 6: A sou Section 8.12.210 is hereby added to Chapter 8.12 of
Title 2 -1 the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in uords sod figures,
as fcllovel
� a.
E
•.Styes. 0 12.t_ _ e.,.rr.ft+e..
"S►e.Citr Ctastil berey detlaras that, .bola nor provision,
section, paragraph, sentence or word of tblo Chapter be rederd or teclerd
invalid by eg final cart attics IN r. evert at ctepatnt jsrlsdistlos, or by
reaus of any prosoptivo logislatin, thb reeais lag prodoina, seatissc.
paragraphs, ooatesoas, ad words of this Chapter .ball romis in fall forts ad
effect."
Amrts Zt She C/7 Clark shall certify to the deptioe of this
Ordieaeco.
1lTMW d, She Ngor sn111 sign this Otdiaanta ad the City Clerk
shall comab the same to bo pa►llsbd witbie fiftses (15) daps attar its passage
at least once is 2A_2dkv jatist, a newspaper of general ciravlatin pebliskN
is the Clty of Ontario, Callfseaia, ad elrcntocd to the City of Rancho
Cotamage, Calilania.
pASSM, AMMED, aaa ANYTO &.0 a ag Of •, lY.
AM
00181
MaVszt
May:
boverly A. Astkoltt, City Clerk
Jdfrg titg. Naar
4
F
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Dates April 2, 1986
2
U >
lei c'tv Council and City Meaner 1777
Vr Park Development Commission
By, Bill BoUey, Director, Continuity 8erwiees Depertaeat
Enbjectr An Ordinance ssendlto the Baacho C*eammn Ja Nut SCipal Code
pertaining to credit for private open a.,,m agasmt the public
part dedication provisions.
(City Council Agenda Iess S-B, April 2, 1986)
P=GIOU➢D.
The proposed tamendsent to the Mmielpal Code provisions on park dodicatim
zeoeirn+sts deal; with credit for private open space.
The esnrnou of the wrtast provisions, paraphrased, arv;
1 o welope moy be reliev%d of 50% of his public park obligation by
inc11.9irg within his project private recreation iscilitlas which suet
a cer'iin r_-- iterie, which. again paraphrased, are.
1. That the proposed private recreational open space unit be a
minimum of three acres to be mmidcred for credit; and
2. Provides at least loci, of the followltult
(a.) Childrea'o play apparatus
(b.) Family barbecue picnic area
(c.) Game Court area
(d.) Swim pool with adjucent deck and secilliary facilities
(e.) Recreation buildings
There is also stsmUrd languages in the privates open apace provisions which
describes exclusions, malutenance pr, '*ions, guarantees of use into
I+erPattdty. etc.
Controversy surrounded the adoption of these provlWOm in 1981 because of
the 'sinimus three acre recaireuent' as a prerequisite to credit
consideration.
17M ISBPft
The Perk Development Commission has reviewed extensively the 'credit for
private optic space issue' and recommends for Council consider_tlon two
changes to Municipal Code eec'_ion 16.32.030 which partalm to Credit for
Private O;Ym space.
23 /
ordinance 1nS -n
April 2, 1906
Pace 2
The first change occurs in Subsection (6) of Section 1 through the
'deletion' of the three acre minimum requiteu as a prerequisite to
consideration.
Presently...
(6) That the minimum oxn space for which credit will Da rnnsidered is
three acres and provides a minimum of four or the elements listed
below, or a combls,ation of such, and other recreational
improvements that will Met the specific recreation park needs of
thi future residents of the area...
Amended to...
(6) That a minimum of four of the elements listed balm be provided, or
a combination of such, and other recreational improvements be
provided that will seat the epeciflc recreation perk needs of the
future residents of the area...
The second chacge also occurs 11 Subseetion (6) by way of an 'addition'.
This is designed to net clear standards for credited improvement@ which
were previously not present. The underlined portion represents the
additional language.
... 2. Submit detailed plans and specifications for areas and improvements
within such proposed private open space. Proposed improvements
The Commission dis:usned at some length the issue of flexibility,
specifically, did U1.4. 'egt.el in quality and design' requirement eliminate
the latitude of design imagination from a potential project? Did it hamper
creativity? The ccnsensus we 'no', It did not.
What the change did was to establish a 'minimum starting point' that we
equal to our own standards against which credit was being requested.
Section (6) proridas in its bag? -ning sentence an open door for
imagination and creativity...
(6) Thet a minim= of .wr of the elements listed below, be provided
?D that will meet the spe
residents of the areas ...
a3a
Ordinance 105 -D
April 2, 1986
Pace 3
with that key 'DR' in place, the Commissior wan satisfied that imagination
and creativity needs not be stifled.
The Commission also discussed the issues of 'may be' versus 'shall be'
granted credit, and, the credit ceiling of up to 50a' versus 033%6 or
025%1, etc. It was the consensus of the Ccrosiesion that the Code should
remain in place as in relative to 'may be' and 'up to So%,. The attached
ordinance reflects that direction of thought.
CCC'1g'NT,
'What could be the potential fiscal impact of this ordinance on the Park
Development Fund? •,s the question which Council asked last December.
An exact answer is not possible of course, but...
If this ordinance had been in place in 1985, and —
if every likely multi- family project bad availed itself of credit
opportunity, and...
If fall credit had be granted to each orolect which had applied...
The net revenue loss to the Yark Development Fund in 1985 would have been
11700000 plus or aloes. This would represent roughly 15% of the annual
revenue to the Park Development Fund at the current level of building
activity in car City.
R'IADnMPKDATIDN:
It is the recommendation of the Perk Development Commission that the
attached Ordinance, 1n S-D, relating to credit for private open apace, be
given first reading at the regular City Council meeting of April 2, 1986.
If I can provide further information please advise.
cc, park Oeval +pment Coorlesion
D
X
a
ORDINANCE NO. 105 -0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF TNP CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING SUB - SECTION E OF
SECTION 1b.a2.030, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATIVE TO PARE AND RECREATIONAL LAN) DEDICATION
REQUIREMENTS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaionga, California, does
ordain as follows,
Section is Sub - section E of Section 16.32.030 of the Rancho
Cucamonqa Municipal Code is hereby amended as follow,
'Credit for Private Open Space'.
Where private open apace for park and recreational purposes is
provided in a proposed subdivision, and such space is to be privately owned
and maintained by the future residents of the subdivision, such areas say hi
credited against not more than fifty percent (50%) of the requirement of
dedication and development for park and recreation purposes, as set forth in
this article, or the payment of fees in lieu thereof, as set forth herean,
provided the Plannlnq Commission finds it is in the public interest to do so,
and that the following standards are met,
(1) That yards, ecurt areas, setbacks and other open areas required
to be maintained by the toning and building provisions of this Code shall not
he included in the computation of such private open space, and
(2) That the private owm,ship and maintenance of the open apace is
adecuately provided for by written agreement( and
(3) That the use of the private open apace in restricted for park
and recreational purposes by recorded covenants which s with the land in
favor of the existinq and future owners of property within the subdivision and
which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the conger, of the Council, and
(a) That the proposed private open space is rea.onably adaptable
for use for park and recreational purposes, takirg into consideration such
factors as sire, shape, topography, geology, access and location of the
private open space land, and
(5) That facilities proposed fcr the op,r apace are in substantial
accordance with the provisions of the recreation and parks element of the
general plan for the �Ity and are approved by the Planning Commission, and
(6) That a minimum of fear of the elements listed 'below, be
provided or a combinatton of such and other recreational improvements be
provided that will meet the specific recreation park needo of the future
residents of the area,
�3 y
Critnria List
1. Children's plav a, paretusl
2. Family barbeque picnic area;
3. Game court area,
4. Sv)m pool with adjacent deck and mcilliary facilitiep
5. Recreation building.
The subdivider requesting consideration for private open space
credit shall, as part of the submittal filing, includet
(1) written request for sue, consideration by the Planning
Commission; and
(2' Submit detailed plans and specifications for areas and
improvements within such proposed private open space.
Pressed Improvements shall be equal in quality and dosign to
public park improvement ataidards where applicable, S,e.,
children's play apparatus, picnic and barbecue equipment, and
game crn;rt lesign and construction.
Th, Planning COLAtsaiOD shall, as an element of tha review for
private one space credit, eolielt comments and recommendations free the Park
Development Commission on all .0 h applications.
Section 2. A1. other portions of Ordinance 105 shall remain in full
force and effect.
Section 32 The Mayor shell sign this Ordinancs and the City Clerk
shall cause the mass to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passag- at least once In The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation
pubiie..d in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROM, and ADOPTED this of , 198 .
AYES
NOES.
ABSENT,
RTTEZTt
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
Jeffrey Xing, Mayor
03's-
f1T 1, T, A L,l.V^ LTV. A 1V1VCA
STAFF REPORT
T114
c
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM. Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -1
Staff is In receipt of a request from numerous developers to form a drainage
assessment district in the area east of Haven Avenue north of the Southern
Pacific Railroad extending to Banyan Avenue south of Chaffey College. The
district would construct Master Plan Storm Drains 4N and 4p.
Included in the request are petitions from over 60% of the owners. Dwight
French, the district Assessment Engineer, Indicatet that the maximum protest
should not exceed 7%.
Nearly all of theland incorporated in the proposed district is experiencing
active development which will be stopped if the cooperative Installation of
drainage cannot be accomplished. The area landowners have attempted for
several years to accomplish this effort on their own but have concluded that
an assessment district will best sclve their problem.
If Council wishes to proceed with the District, it would be appropriate to
adopt several resolutions initiating the process. Yey action includes:
1. Selection of and agreements with the following consultant team:
Assessment Engineer: Dwight F. French, Inc.
Bond Counsel: Nazarek, Harper, Hopkins & McFarlin
Bond Underwriters: Stone 6 Youngberg
Each consultant contract is contingent on successful formation of the
district. if the district is not formed, there will be no costs to the City.
2. Resolution adopting the proposed boundaries
3. Resolution accepting petitions and waiving the preparation of a Debt
Report
4. Resolution ordering preparation of the Engineer's Report
2.3(.
CITY councrL STAFF REPokr
Requett fnr Formation of As ^ossment District 86 -1
April 2, 1965
Page 2
RECDRAMTIDN
Staff has reviewed all of the proposed actions and would reconnaeno proceeding
with the district. Should Council concur, it would be appropriate to adopt
the attached resolutions and approve tie consultant contracts with
Dwight F. French, Inc., Nazarek, Harper, HOWL% and HcFarlln and Stone &
Youngberg.
rw Res subm tted,
IN4
Ltfil.j
Attachments
X32
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A
STAFF REPORT �
C � o
April 2, 1986 1977
City Council and City Manager
Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
REOUCST FOR FORMA--IOH 0 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -1 -
3UPFCERERTTLTFFOIrORIDA- CDORCiC 1
S'- bsequent to preparation of the Council agenda, staff has been in
receipt of the Bond Underwriter's Agreement, aid additional property
owrars' petition and the project boundary map. This inforoation is
supplemental to your previous Council packet. The Stone and Youngberg
agreement follows previous agreements on other Districts done in the
City. Staff recommends approval of the agreement.
LH /jr
Attachments
STONE & YOUNGBERG
vEmara3 ,donc sm ac"Ngt
March 6, 1986
City Council
C.Ity of Rancho Cucamonga
City Hall
9320 Base Line Road
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Res City of Rancho Cucamonga Improvement Bonds
Storm Drain Assessment District
Dear Members of the CiLy Councils
This letter will serve as an agreement between the City of
Underwriter mtog n
the City until ythe 9parties enter into aan9actual
Purchase Contract egurding the negotiated sale of the City's
Improvement Bonds to be issued by the City pursuant to the
Improvement Act of 1919 (the 'Bonds*) and the Procedural Act of
1913.
You have informed us that the City intends to issue the Bonds to
this funds finance
hispurposerequiresthe services public
ofa Man e
agingUnderwriter to
structure the financing and to enter into a Purchase Contract
that Is agreeable to both parties.
As Managing Underwriter, we will use our utmost efforts to raise
funds at the most reasonable rates attainable in the market
under then existing conditions. In amplification of the
understanding between the City and the Managing Underwriter,
Stone t Youngberg agrees to undertake the below - listed services
and functions.
A. S r1 lrino th Pinae ins
1. Stone 6 Youngbero will work with your staff in developing
the scope of the financial feasibility and assessing the
marketability of the project.
2. Stone 6 Yolingborg will work with the City's bond
counsel recommending specific terms and conditions
affecting the basic security of the Bonds.
4105 rA� SM E%VA SWM 2U • Na NeLLYNWa 4ALWOR M 91W2 • MQ 9"21
City Council
City Rancho Cucamonga
March 6, 1986
Page -2-
3. Stone & Youngberg will prepare the text of an offering
memorandum for sale of the securities. Said memorandum
will include a description of the bonds and their
security, and pertinent financial and economic cata.
In preparation of such prospectus, we will exercise due
diligence in the ancertainment of all material facts
and circumstances regarding the project and their
disclosure in the prospectus.
4. Stone b Youngberg will be present at any necessary
information meeting or meetings.
5. If the City so requests, we will ausist in arranging
the selection of a paying agent.
73 1 ,' F;M_ TIM = ...I�i
1. The Managing Underwriter will use its beet efforts to
accomplish the formal marketing at the earliest date
possible consistent with sound investment banking and
underwriting principles. It is intended that, once
purchased by Stone & Youngberg, the bonds will be re-
offered to tha public on the basic of an immediate
•bona fide public offering." Stone & Youngberg may
form a group of investment banking firms for the
purpose of underwriting and selling the bonds.
2. Stone & Youngberg will submit an offer to the City to
purchase the bonds at least three working days prior
to the final confirmation of the assessments, subject
to pertinent reoolutiona, the Offering Memorandum, and
all other necessary documen
proceedings governing ruch
by bond counsel, the City,
Underwriter satisfactory in
purposes. If, after negoti
Youngberg in good faith, th
Youngberg fail to agree on
the City may terminate this
bonds for sale to others.
determined
all ranpects for financing
tions with Stone &
City and Stone &
arms of sale of the bonds,
agreement, then offer the
1. The City agrees to cooperate •ith Stone & Youngberg to
make available copies of economic and financial
City Council
City Rancho Cucamonga
March 6, 1966
Pago -3-
reports, agreements, contracts, resolutions, and other
relevant documents pertaining to the project, the rity
or the bonds an reasonably may be required from time to
time for prompt and efficient performance by Stone i
loungberg of their obligations hereunder.
2. Stone i Youngberg shall pay its own out -of- pockst and
other expenses, the cost of the preparation of the
Offering Memorandum, Underwriter's Counsel, Blue Sky
and Investment Memoranda used by the Underwriters and
all advertising expenses in connection with the public
offering of the bonds.
3. The City shall pay from the proceeds of the bonds or
other funds of the City all costa and expenueb icludl
printingithe paid
onds, and otherndocamentthetcost of and
experues of its legal counsel, bond counsel,
consultants, accountants, and of any other experts
retained by the City in connection with the financing.
4. It is expressly understood and agreed and the City
hereby recognizes that in porforming its activities
pursuant to a negotiated sale that Stone a Youngberg Is
acting solely on its own behalf as the prospective
manager of an underwriting group which plans to submit
to the City a proposal to purchase the bends for
resale. Nothing herein shall be construed to make the
Managing Underwriter an employee or financial, fiscal,
advisor e city fiduciary relationshipbetwe r
between the City band hthe
Managing Underwriter.
S. This agreement shall extend to the date of sale of the
bonds as contemplated herein, when the formal bond
Purchase Contract is entered into by the parties.
6. The City may terminate this agreement if, after
negotiations in good faith, the City and Stone a
Youngberg fail to agree on mutually acceptable terms of
Bale of the bonds. Upon termination of this agreement,
the City shall be under no further obligation to the
Managing Underwriter hereunder, except that t ?.e City is
obligated to pay to the Managing Underwriter any
cpensea incurred on behalf of the City puraaant to
- i
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
!larch 6, 1986
Page -4-
Paragraph C(2) of thin agreement should the City not
cell the bonds to the Managing Underwriter on behalf of
the Underwriters pursuant to section U of this
agreement.
Upon your acceptance set forth below, this letter will
constitute an agreement between the City and the Undernigned.
Accepted this day of , 1985
Sity of RanchQ_(,'UCamenea
BY: —___
CERTIFICATE RE ADEQUACY
OP
PETITION
If. ax.v vt
I, DWIGHT P. FRENCH, hereby certify as follows:
1. That I an the duly anpointed and acting Engineer of
Work for
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. a6 -1
of the City of nancbc Cucamonga (the "Assessment District ").
2. That I beve received and reviewed s Petition for the
construction of improvements and waiver of requirements of
Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code signed by owners of
property within the Assessment District.
1. That the Petition has boon signed by the owners of more
than 60} in area of the property subject to the assessment for
the proposed improvements within the Assessment District.
4. That the "owners of land" are those persons who, at tho
tint the Petition was filed with the City Clerk, appear to be
such owners upon the County Assessor's Roll, or, in the case of
transfers of land, appear to be such owners on the records in the
County Assessor's Office.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true
and correct. .at[
Executed this � day of Aa-le,-Z , 1986, at ,L
California.
DWIGHT P. FRENCH, INC.
By: i G
Dwight P. French
Engineer of Work
f�
U
i
Ct! :a ^C= =r ^)
AND C7 07 C7
2 - LYC =.C" bei =; cr..e_s al t!:c a----
as ahcm or tto pLat a"T ^'•ed t= and =de s I 4: i'-s.,
as r7 h.,~Jit ^.l", v44t8 Aga_rt� v lL be sMJ;e= to =Y� £c` ;
t_`'e L�tcvicea`s herai:a!ta= dea=f =ed, hs_aby =ac_^_e tfns `C_'?
tnta p:•Ccaeditgs tMT'A t=e ^,n--!Ci7.t l� —=7=9— 3C ct
.91] ", being Divisiaa 12 Cr-- `=a St =ee.:s a--Mt Bigbmzys C a, t=
cans- �C_ ca_- `..ats pc5lic vo=.@c are f_,�..cc a a' =5^r •• :,..._,0
it nacassa_=y, generally des=L*ad as aLLaas:
cans--rac`i= and i =sta Tw+r• Of
=ants tcgathe: vit!l apy=ta .Cal' a=d ,a T�e••�.• --
vor., acquisition, if necassy, and 'Fs d .• l
ererses >a CS^xc- -i= the_--evit:
(.ha •L- p= ov=en`s ^).
that, i= the opiato= Of the City, = r be =ecas= -'Z to P=3�-7
e!_e__ =te,..A L,zeve =en`s.
== D`•ID"<!G:Fi f.� ream = eCi.last that the '-7 =Zkc ttw
desigst_cns scecilied as .:oLTcJS:
1. ^..e e= gi-ee =(si deei.,^ -3tae. = as —e t!:w =ate
sibilitiea a:C. ye::cr= t_e d=4— a_ _
i=.g• ^ee= .'o= =a d.^•sess =e=`_ Dis =t= stxS Ize
CWM= P. =C=, LIu
(the ^.Uads. =e=t �.;'_=er r s�jeCt a r,
Qf an ai_ee rent fcr _ ^g3earitg Sa. -hers. '
2. =a underwriter deri; --ated to purchase bCnda
-em
resp=tl ^q unpaid assessments is the assossr:ant
D15triC_ stall be
S:C.S_ & YOMGS?.RG
(`he "Lic=.rritar "), subject 'to apprcval a! a Purchase
Agree=rcrt.
]. The att.- -ey(s) desig -%ted as Send Ccti::.sal fcr the
asseswiant procacdingm shall be
1LLZ,'1R'3, hs'1.lrm, HOp =s & HCS:.RI.1V
(the -11cnd Counsel "), subject to approval of an
Agree meat • r Bond Counsel Services.
ME ITMERSIGRT.D furt�her request that all efforts and
a--eats be made so that assessment proceedings can be initiated
a:1 the 3esol=:ion of Intention can be adopted at the earliest
ti3o.
1.°'- MIDs"'{sSi0TZD further agree that tao City will incur no
sb "5atvan for the payment of any censultL -q se_.riees unless
;tra is S successful eoaf! raticn of assessment end sale of
bo:.ds.
T. VNL `s =G= ex ressly waive the p -_caedi.-gs cud all
1-1tation5 under the "Special ;ssessmant Lzvesti;ation,
T'- 'tat'_om and Lajority ?rotest act of 1931 ", b•aL -q Divisicn a of
the Streets and His!r4ays Cade.
T=S ?1".'^a':C:7 X'VL HE SIC;= I:! C=.rZ_°3.1RT i.`,hD C- ONST^.'O :ES
:,:ID A.1_^r'1, AND lay ZZ CMISCLLD,A:_D HIll S: :L;. i
P�C S AND WXT17MAS tCR .S1.a:AR L`D?ROVi.'."_!r:S H =REL`i Y�:IT.IOIlED.
M; 1.
Ir
Rosalie E. Boraio
Aka Roralie E Johnson
p
AP No. 201-271-75,26,
].
ReV156D CoNsatcr Diem
CITY OF RANCHO CUQUIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986 Lvn
T0: City Council and City Manager
fRaM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: Approval of acceptance of Alta Loma Stone Drain (AD 84-2) as
complete and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion for the
work
The Alta Las& Storm Drain (AD 84-2) Project has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council approve
the acceptance of the project, authorize the final payment and direct the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release
performance surety ($1,928,190.00) and retention ($98,002.11)
RECON E WATION
It is recommended that Council accept as complete the Alta Loma Store Drain
(AD 84-2) Project and pass the attached resolution authorizing the City
Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and release the faithful performance
bond and retention (35 days after filing Notice of Completion) and authorize
final payment.
Respectfully subm tted,
L& as
Attachment
EVOLUTION No. 4 G - 10
RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COVECIL OF THE CITY OF RUCRO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING DYS:CHATIOES AND APPOINTMI -13
TO FULFILL RESPONSIBILITIES AND PERFORM DUTIES FOR SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
(ASSESSXERS AWILCi ■0. tK -1)
WREREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the
"City ") is considering the formation of an assessment district, pursuant to the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•, being Division 12 of the Streets and
Higbrays Code, for certain public works and improvements sad acquisitions, if
necessary, generally described as follwu
The construction and installation of drainage ieq,rovemats
Including appurtenances and appurtenant work, acquisition,
If necessary, and incidental expenses in connection
therewith
(the "roveants ");
WRE.TEAS, the lands to be specially assessed for the Improvements
shall be included within an asesse,eot district designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -1
(the "Assessment District ");
WHEREAS, the City desire@ to make designations and appointments to
fulfill responsibilities and perform duties incident to the assessment
Proceedings. in the time, form and mosses required by last
NOM. THERYlOE, the City Council of the City of Reecho Cucamonga does
does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE ASO ORDER an follwat
SECTION It The above recitals are all true and correct.
HECTIDM 2t The parson appointed to assume the responsibilities and
perform the duties of Superintendent of Streets for the Assessment District
shall be
LLOYD SUSBS
(the "Superintendent of Streets ").
SECTION 3: The Office of the Superiatetdent of Streets is hereby
designates as the place for recordation of the assessment roll and diagtaa
which shall be kept as a permanent record of the Assessment District.
a3 s
SECTION 4t The newspaper designated for all publications for the
Acaeueenr District aball be
THE DAILY REPORT
SECTION St The aagtuaar(s, designated to assume the responsibilities
and perf ova the duties of Engineer of Work for the Assessment Di, triet @hall be
DW.'BY F. FI EUCH. Inc.
(the "Engineer of Wort") and the Engineer of Work shall assure the
responsibilities and perform the duties speeified in the Agr mmaut fo:
Engineering Services on file with the City Clerk vbieb is hereby authorised and
approved.
SECTION 6 t The und.ariter designated to purchase bonds representing
unpaid assessments in the Assessment District shall be
STGNE 6 YODRCDERG
(the "Oadervriter ") and the Cadarwriter tbal; parehaaa such bonds as speei ^ied
In the Purchase Agreement on file vith the City Clerk vbiah is hereby
authorised and approved.
SECTION ?t The attorusy(s) appointed a% Hand Counsel aball be
NAZAREE, HARPER, HOPKINS 6 NCFARLIB
(tLe "Bond Counsel ") and Bond Counsel shall assume the resporelbilities 3
perform the dur'es specified in the Agreement for Bond Counsel so" leap oe t .a
with the City Clerk which Is hereby authorised and approved.
SIOUSI Et A Sp"Ial Tond designated by the cam and comber of the
Asaessamt District is bony , •tabliabed and all proceeds from the sale of
bonds asi comb collection, cbs' be depesited into this Fund. In order to
expedite these procoodiup " as from any nailabla source aq be transferred
to this loud. Any wait@ transferred shall be a Iota to this Fund and oball be
repaid fro„ proceeds from the sale of bonds and cash collections, pursuant to
Section 10210 of the Streets and Cigbvps Code.
PASSED, APPROFED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 18*.
Q3 7
RESOLUTION 90. lb- 9'
RESOLUTION OF TEE CITt COUNCIL OF THE CITT Dr RANCHO
CUCAMOACA, CALIFORNIA, SEXING THE CDREPAL DATURE, LOCATION
AMD EETSIT OF CERTAIN PUBLIC VOWS AND IMPROVEMENTS AND
SHOWING THE PRCPOSTD BOUNDARIES OF ThE AREA IO BE ASSESSED
THEREFOR
(AaaEaaM!$T DIa r� RO. H6 =11
VVSFAS, the City Ceaneil of the City of Rancho Ccaaaoaga (the
"City ") is considering the forattion of an assessment district, pursuant to the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 19130, being Division 12 (eoaaeucing with Section
10000) of the California Streets and Highways Code, for construction of certain
public works and improvemente and acquisitions, if necassery, genszolly
described as foliwst
The construction and installation of drainage improvecats
including apporta -aces and appurtenant work, acquisition,
if nocessary, and incidental expenses in ceaneetion
tbarewitb
(the °Iaprovenant@ ");
WHEREAS, the lands to be specially assessed for the Improvements
@bell be included within at assessment district designated as
ASSEg3MENT DISTRICT 50. 06 -1
(the "Arsessment District ");
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed a map showing the
general nature, location and =tent of the Imprweme..ts and showing the
boundaries of the area proposed to be assessed therefor.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of leach* Cucamonga does
hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE ADD ORDER as follw]t
SE,tna L1t The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2t The map of tha Assessment District showing the general
aature, location and extent of the proposed public works of inprovesent and
acquisitions, if necessary, and shoving the boundaries of the territory
containing the lands proposed to be specially assessed to pay the costs and
erpeases of the proposed Improvements entitled:
PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
ASSESSNLIIT DISTRICT 60. 86 -1
(the "Map of the Assessment District") is hereby approved and adopted.
s1 io
SECTION 3: She original Map of the Assessmeat District and one copy
thereof aboll be filed in the Office of the City Cleck.
S=TCH .tt She Mar of the Ataeosaert District shall Sworn for all
details an to the "tact of the Assessment District.
HEITIOW St A certificate avideae,ag tba data and adoption of this
resolution sball br endorsed on the origins. Map of :be Assessment District sad
on at least one copy thereof.
SECrICR et Within fifteen (15) days after adoptina of the resolution
fixiug the time and place of bearia, on the formation or extent of the
Assessment District, a copy of the Mat of tho Assessment District shell be
filed vitb cotrect and proper andorcamen a thereon in the Office of the County
Recorder, pursuant to Section 3111 of the Streets and Higbvays Code.
PISSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this • day of •, 19s.
ATESt
HOES:
ASSEEtt
Jeffrey sing, Mayor
ATTESSTt
Sevurly A. Autbelet, City Clark
I, SURELY A. ADSREIRT. CIST C' ERE of the City of Rancho Cucacaga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution vu duly passed,
apprised, and adopted by the City Cocacil of the City of Raacbo Cucamnga,
California, at a regular (special, adj :urnad) meeting of said City Council held
on the • day of •, 19s+.
Executed this a day of e, 19es at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ti
4
l gnarly A. Autbelet. City Clark
i�
ippaa
F1i
j
RESOLUTION 270. _0k to
RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, BAN HERNAROINO
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING PINDINGO ?ND
DETERMINATIONS UNDER SEC=ON 2804 OF
THE STREETS AND HIGH11AYS CODE
(ASSESSMEN'Z DISTRICT NO. e6 -1)
WHEREAS, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(the "City ") is considering the formation of an assessment
district, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ",
being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Cade, for crrtain
public works and improvement= and acquisitions, if necessary,
generally described as follows:
The construction rn-A installation of drainage
improvements including appurtenances and
appur tenant work, acquisition, if necessary,
and incidental oxpenoes in connection therewith
(the "Improvements ")7 and
ir1(E:t1AS, the lands to be specially assessed for the
Improvements shall be included within an assessment district
designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -1
(the "Assessment District"); and
WHEREAS, the City council has rocived a Petition signed by
owners of assessable property within the Assessment Distric•
requesting construction of the Improvements and waiving proceed-
ings and limitations under Division 4 of the Streets and Highways
code:
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows:
y
Section 1. The above recitals are 311 Vrue and correct.
Section 2. ''the City Council hcroby finds and determines:
(a) That the Petition meets the requirements of Section
2804(3) of the Streets and Highways Coda, in that, the
Petition is signed by the rnmere of land constituting
more than 60% of all assessable land within the
Assessaent District; and
(b) That the proceedings and linitations under Division 4
of the Street.6 and P.ighways Coda shall not be
applicable to these proceedings.
Sectior 3. The Petition shall be filed with the transcript
of these proceedings and shall be open to public inspection.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 1986.
ATTEST:
City Clark
(SEAL)
/ 2/
yJ
mayor
b
Lamunom H0. 9G—O)-3
RESOLUTICS OF TES CITT COUNCIL OP TEE CITY of OASCRO
CDCA110NCA, CALIFORXIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ORD)CN TEE
CONSTRUCTION Of CERTAEN IMPg0EE1ID"iS TaCETEEE WITH
APPURTENANCES IN A PROPOSED ASSIVEOUr DISTRICT PORSI/NT To
TEE PROVISIONS QT TO •MUNICIPAL INYMEHENT AC? OT 1913•;
DECLAIM TO 903E TO HE 07 NOSE THAN LOCAL OR CUDISAIT
BENEFIT; DESCRIBING TED DISTRII ^, TO BE ASSESSED To PAT TAN
COSTS AND WiRSES TETlEOF; AND PR07IDINC PON TIE ISSUANCE
OF BONDS
(ASS-C ,=T afinrCT N0. M._3)
WOREAN, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the
.City") is considering the fermatiC0 of as essessmeat district, pursaaut to the
*Municipal Improvement Act of 19130, being Division 12 (Coeamciag with Section
10000) of the California Streets and E(Sbusys Code, fcm certain public works
and ioproeenents and acquisitions (the •Isprovemenu•); and
WHEREAS, the City desire, to declare its intention to order tL•o
construction of the Ieprovements, declaring the work to .r of acre than local
or ordinary benefit. descr /sing tae leads to be *amassed to Pay the Coats and
e:Pensts of the Improvmants, providing for the issuance of bonds and making
other datermiaations,
NOW. T'HMEEORE. the City Council Of the City of Reach* Cocamonda does
hereby RESOLVE, DECLARE AND ORDER an follows:
41 140&. 1. 1• e
SEMIJUS Tho public Internet and Convenience require, and it is
the iotention of the City, pursuant to the provllious of the •Municipal
Improvement Act of 19130 to order construction of the Impro aneots in a
special asseamment district known and designated as
ANSESSMNS DISTRICT 90. 06 -I
(the "Aseesse,ut District *).
(a) The Construction of the I14movements, together vi th
aPPurtenaeces and apportemmar work cad acquisition, if
necessary, to certdn Public $treats and rigbts -of-way in the
Assessment District, is Semscaliy described as follwss
She coca tion end installation of drainage
improvements together with appurtenances and
appertemant work, acquisition, if necessary. and
ictideatal expanses In czn tian therewith
pot iortber partiwlars, reference is hereby ends ten a Nap of
the dssestaeat District previously adopted.
(b) The streets, rights -of -wry and essememse shall be shoes apow the,
plans herein referred to and to be filed with these proceedings—
(c) All of the Iaprwements are to be coastsncted at the plates. awd.
Lo rho particular locations, of the forms, sizes, dLawasLose'and-
uaterials, and at the lines, grades and elevations as sbomu and -
delineated mnoa the plans, pr6filas and specifications to be-
made therefor. as bereinafter provided.
(d) The description of tha Improvements and the termini of the wort-
contained In this Casolution are general In "tare. All items
of mark do not aetessaily attend for the fall length of the,
description thereof. The Plans and profiles of thrwotk aa.
contained in be rr Ausat. Seport shall be controlling as to the,
correct am: detaLIW descri —tan tbereof.
(e) Vbeaever any pablte way is herein referred to as ranaing-between-
bio public ways, ar from or to any public way, the iutersrctisog;
Of the public vays referred to are included to the arreut that
wort shall be abown on the pleas to be done tbsreia.
(f) Notice is hereby given of the four that in many cases the
Improsememts will bring the finished wort to a grade different-
free that ferenrly existing, and t� Z' nxteut, the grades are
hereby changed and the wank will be dome to cat changed grades.
pq Y 44 AFXfA end• .)• ti
SOUS The laprovemests are of direct oesafit to the properties-
and laud within the Assessment District, and the City bsrfy wzkas the erpmaas:
of the Improvements chargeable upon the Assessment District, which Asseasenst-
District to bereby declared to be the Assessrmt District besafited by the -
Improvemente and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of the-
Improvements, including incidential costs and espsasss. The Assessment District
Is described as follo:•s,
All that territory is the Assessment District included
within the exterior boundary lines skown on the Nap
exbibitiog the property affected or bassfited by or to
be assessed to pay the costs cad erpsesse of the
Iayrovemente in the Iassesment District, said- map
titled ad identified as
X95
"PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
ASSESBNESS DISITIC2 :10. B6 -1"
and which map was heretofore approved and is on file
with the transcript of these proceedio68, EICEPSIEO
from the area sbwn within and deliteated upon the
map, the area of all public streets, Public avenues,
public lanes, public roads, public drives. public
courts, public allays, and all *imamate and
rights- cf-way therein contained belonging to the
public. Poc all particeLrs ac to the boundariae of
the Assessmeot District, relecenca in be_eby mde to
the map and for a coa416ta description of the
Aasassmat District, the beundasy mp ea file shall
Severn.
ggrnw y,i the proposed laprwemats are bereby % derred to the
Engineer of Vork who is directed to prepare ace file a wrictea report (the
"Report") wbicb @hall contains
(a) Plans and specificotious of the Improwemuta;
(b) An estimate of the cost of the Imprevamnte, including the
incidental apauses in connection therewith;
(c) A diagram showing the Assessment District and the boundaries and
dimusions of the respective subdivisions of land within the
Assessm at District, as the sale existed at the time of the
passage of the Reeolutico of Intention (the "Diagrae). Bach
subdivision #ball to Swan a separate Dunbar upon the Diagram;
(d) An assessment of the total count of the asseeaabl• several
subdivisions of land in proportion to the eatimted benefits to
be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from Lbe
Isprowements (the "Assessment"). The Assessment ebsil refer to
the subdivisions upon the Dlngrm by the respective numbers
thereof; and
(e) A description of the Improvements and acquisition, where
necessary.
Vher any portion or percentage of the cost and expen@ss of the
Impzovemate is to be paid from source@ other tbau assessments, the amount of
each portion or percentage #ball first be deduet�A frog tht total estimated
costs mad "ponies of the Iepravamute R.d tha A#aassmat absil include only
the remainder of the estimated costa ar3 expences.
I MI'l
C;) y11
SNCYICN 5; Notice is hereby given that serial bonds (the "Bonds*) to
represent unpaid moseasmentes end hearing interest at the rats of not to excacd
the current legal naxiaus rate of 122 par occur, will be issued in the manor
provided in the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", bring Division 10 (commuting
with Section 8500) of the Streets and gigbvsys Codes the last installment of
which Bonds aball mature a mzimus of and not to eased nineteen (19) years
Iron the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their
date. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the Struts and Highways Codas providing
an alternative procedure for the advance payment of assas@mnts and the calling
the Bonds shall apply.
The principal amount of the Bonds maturing each year shall be other
than an amomst equal to an even annual proportion of the aggregate principal of
the Bonds, and the amount of principal maturing in racb year, plus the amount
of interest payable in that year, will be as amount that is approzimtely, equal
each year. accept 1" an adjcstacat in the !trot years assessment.
BOND 2EDENPTItM
SECTION 6.r 'be IagislatiTe Body elects cc provide that the Bonds,
upon redeaption prior to maturi7s abet: provide a preni.m of five percent (51)
or the unmtured principal, and that 1 *uguoge shall be added to the redemption
clause in the bond form to require the property must to pay the premium in
order to discharge the obligation of the lien prior to maturity.
UXUALZIM
SECTION Tt The Lrinlative Body establishes a special fund
designated
IMPBOpENBBT FUND TOE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -1
into which monies may be transferred at may time to expedite the raking of the
Improvements hereto authorized, and said monies are a loan mod @ball be repaid
cut of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds as authorized by law.
SDR_m -0p FUNDS
501141LAt If any =cars @ball be realized from the Aaassement, it
ohall be used, in such amounts as the Legislative Dod my determine, in
accordance with the provisions of lac for one or amore of the following
purposess
(a) IYansfer to the general fund, provided that the sweet of any
such transfer *hall not "Coed the Isomer of One Thousand
Dollars (01,000.00) or five percent (51) of the total sawmt
expeuded from the Improvement Fund=
(b) As a credit wpve the assessment and may swpplemental sagasammc
as provided in Need" 10427.1; or
(c) For the meiateaamce of the 7sprovemests.
HIfGZir3L£r Ctcept as herein otbesvise provided for the isaaaane of
the booda, all of the Improvements shall be sale and ecI ad parsamt to the
provisions of the vganicipel Improvement Act of 191 10,
BZMQK M: All poSlic props ty in the ese and pertormsma of a
public function shall be omitted from aaaasa t is these proceedings oleo
expressly provided cad listed beroin.
Az2n2L Ut The public interest, caovesivmce sad necessity may
require that certain lard, rights-of-way or easements be obtained in order to
allow the Improvements for this Assessaeat District to be occoaplish d. Fox a
general description of the location and extent rd` the eas:aemts or land
0ecemsary to be acquired, if. may, referesce is hereby ..de to cps om file with
the transcript of these proceedings.
GUM
5 01d 12t Notice is hereby given that the grade to vbicb the Weak
shall be dame is to be shown an the plans and profiles therefor, which grade
may very from the existing grade&. The work herein comtesplated shall be dame
to the grades as indicated on the plasm and specif ieatiams, to whit.% reference
is sea for a descriptive of the grade at which the work is to be dome. Amp
objectiore or protests to the proposed grade shall be made at tic pablic
bearing to be coodacted wader these proceedirgs.
CNADN AAJOSMMT
gNCnd fan The Legislative Body determines that it is In tke pabiic
Interest aed more scomomical to do certsim Work as private pcapezty to
eliminate a0 disparity iu level or size betwevu eSv Itgcwaesats amd private
property and to add the actual cost of sack Work ;o the Ass,ows.ezt of tke
property to which scab work aen dome; provided t,Lt so -0 of this measure
shall be performed until aed unless the writtam temsamt al tke weer df
property is first obtained.
Dqg
SECIlOR ld: Notice is hereby given that the public interest rill not
be served by allcs.iug the property peters to take the contract for the
coaefrs-tiaa of the 7aWrprenmL, asd that, as authorized by ln, no notice of
and of ccetract shall be pabliabed.
SECy7O• 15: All inquiries for any and all information relating to
Cleat proceediagas including infonrtion relating to protest procedures, should
be directed tn-.
Lloyd Hobbs. City gogineer
City of Rancho Cocasauga
9161 Baseline Road
11— o Cu- aga. California 91730
(718) 989 -1831
M;32 f le: This resolutions shell be effective upon its adoption.
rdSSED, dryROIED, and dDOrM this * day of *. 1S*.
dyES:
SONS:
ASSM.
J stray Ring. Mayor
3ner2y L authelets City Clark
1. RE9y.R<S L PVTMZr. CM CLE K of the City of Rancho L%caaoaga,
California. do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution vas duly passed,
ayprweds am adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanougss
C+litoaia, at a r2901ar (special. adjourned) meting of said City Council held
oa the * day of *, 190*_
.)q9
TO: CITY OF PMCRO CUCA14OUGA
(the "City ")
PETIT:= FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF I!¢ROVEMIXTS
AND WlaVER OF REQUIREMENTS OF DIVISION 4 CP THE
STREET AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE
STATP. OP CALIP)RNIA
THE NNDERSIGNED, being owners of property within the area
as shown o:i the p :.at attached to and node a part of this petition
as Exhibit "A ", wt•dch property will ba subject to assessment for
the improvements hereinafter described, hereby request the City
to institute proceedings under the "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913 ", being Division 12 of the Strosts and Highways Code, to
construct certain public works and improvements and acquisitions,
if necessary, ganeially described as follows:
Construction and installation of drainage improve-
ments together with appurtenances and appurtenant
work, acquisition, if necessary, and incidental
expenses in connection therewith
(the "Improvements "M.
THE UNDERSIGNED further request such other appurtenant work
that, in the opinion of the City, nay be necessary to properly
effectuate the Improvements.
THE UNDERSIGNED further request that the City make the
designations specified as follows:
1. The englnaer(s) desiSnated to assume the respon-
sibilities and porform the duties of J.ssasrmant
Engineer for the Assessment District shall be
DWIGHT P. FREMNCH, INC.
(the "Assessment Engineer "), subject to approval
. c c
of an Agreement for Engineering Services.
2. The underwriter designated to purchase bonds
representing unpaid assessments in the Assessment
District shall be
STONE i YOUNG9ERG
(the "Underwriter "), uubject to approval of a Purchase
Agreement.
3. The attorney(s) designated as Bond Counsel for the
assessment proceedings shall be
NAZAREK, HARPER, HOPKINS i MCFARLIN
(the "Bond Counsel "), subject to approval of an
Agreem3nt for Bond. Counsel Services.
THE UNDERSIGNED further request that all efforts and
attempts be mauo so that assessment proceedings can be initiated
and the Resolution of Intention can be adopted at the earliest
time.
TILE UNDZRSIr.NED furthor agree that the City will incur no
obligation for the payment of any consulting services unless
there is r successful confirmation of assessmont and sale of
bonds.
THE UNDERSIGNED expressly waive the proceedings and all
limitations under the "Special Asoassmant Investigation,
Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 "8 being Division 4 of
the Streets and Highways Coda.
THIS PETITION MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTERPART AND CONSTITJTES
ONE PETITION AND WAIVER, AND MAY BE CONSOLIDATED WITH SIMILAR
PETITIONS AND WAIVERS FOR SIMILAR INRt0,`Z1'MS HEREIN MENTIOJMD.
2.
Asa
u
c
i L
IUx R"d."i n
2050 S gunriq Drive
Suite 225
Loa Angeles, CA 90025
c
U W4 4' . 4' . 9.. : lP .
P- Ird-n 701- 771 -11 201 -27 -
77, 201 -271 -;4
7.
v X5-3
f
PER
First Nationwide
Network Mortgago Cc
MOM— TY_MSC.RinI N SIT,? + o
Soo Attached
As authorized govt
7.
a5s1
A�,
:a
H= PROPERTY DESCQ!p!'ZON SFG:FA=,R?
s E� lN✓tf. ME is (+,(. A.P. etoz- aa✓- y� C'.1�,. G, Gr,
�af rdvaQ. NO. 38�/% �'f'l• '`rte
�ONP rivaq.
7.
osv
�t
NAME. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SIGNATURE
LAN BENTSEN INTERESTS PARCELI
Lot °K° and a Portion of Lemon Avenue (vacr:ted),
of Foothill Prostless Fruit Companies Subdivision
No. 2, In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per
map recorded In Rook 20 of Maps, Page 34,
Records of said County.
Sdd Parcel is also described as follows, beginning
at the Soutiaast comer of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map
No. 7264 per map receded La Book 81, Pages 62
and 63 of M" thencu North Or 04' 550 East
1,28354 feet= thence Notth Sr 44107- East 50.00
feet: thence South 00' 041550 Wit 1,283AS feet
thence South 89' 40' 220 Hest 50.00 feet back to
the point of beguuft. Containing 1,445 acres.
n 4. k
TRACT R
Parcel No. 2 of Parcel Map 7264 and a portion of
Lemon Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamorkla,
as per Map retarded in Beak 81, Pages 62 and 63
of Parcel Map, in the office of the Canty
Recorders of said County.
�S'
C
!i34,57 Cw ros
QU VTNQ(Si- P
! 1 , •
7.
357
r i�.tc
.�5
C,
DPC III. • California
Limited Partrrs p
P.M. 9416
NEC Haven 6 Highland
3. Q
�Su
C�
lli =f-f�-
Ja m S. O'M+sra
CERTIFICATE RE ADEQUACY
OF
PETITION
(ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 86 -1)
I, DWIGHT F. FRENCH, hereby certify as follows:
1. That I am the duly appointed and acting Engineer of
Work for
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -1
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Assessment District ").
2. That I haws received and reviewed a Petition for the
construction of improvements and waiver of requirements of
Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code signed by owners of
property within the Assessment District.
]. That the Petition has been signed by the owners of more
than 60% in area of the property subject to the assessment for
the proposed improvements within the Assessment District.
4. That the "owners of land" are those persons who, at the
time the Petition was filed with the City Clerk, appear to ba
such owners upon the County Assessor's Roll, or, in the ease of
transfers of land, appear to be such owners on the records in the
County Assessor's Office.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true
and correct.
Executed this — day of , 1986, at
California.
DWIGHT F. FRENCH, INC.
Hy:
Dwight F. French
Engineer of Work
C),5-5p
AGREEMENT
FOR
BOND COUNSEL SERVICES
(ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0, 66 -1)
THIS .LGREEHENT is made and entered into this __ day of
1986, by and between the CITY 0. RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a municipal corporation, San Bernardino County, California, here-
inafter called "City ", and NAZAREE, HARPER, HOPRINS i HCFARLIN,
attorneys at law, Irvine, California, hereinafter called
"Counsel ".
BE211AL2
WHEREAS, City desires to employ Counsel to perform legal
services incident to the formation of an Assessment District,
pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, with bonds to be
issued repro= gnting unpaid assessmants, for the construction of
certain improvements d.d acquisition, if nocessary, including
appurtenances and appurtenant w.ric generally described as follows:
The construction and installation of drainage
improvements including appurtenances and
I work, acquisition, if necessary, and
incidental expenoes in connection therewith
"the Improvements".
WHEREAS, Counsel is prepared and able to provide all legal
services required and necessary incident to formation of the
Assessment District and issuance and sale of the bonds:
W •
92MZ ABTA
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by the parties hereto
as follcws:
Section 1. AGREE.YENT FOR SERVICES. City employs Counsel
to render and Counsel agrees to rand ^.r legal services incident to
the Assessment District an follows:
(a) Examination of the plans and specifications for the
proposed work, the map of the assessment district, the
assessment roll and diagram, bonds, and giving of
instruction and advice in connection with the
foregoing.
(b) Preparation of all resolutions, notices, contracts,
bond forms, and other papers and documents required in
the assessment proceedings.
(c) Examination of the assessment proceedings, step by
step, as taken.
(d) Attendance at meetings of the City council, as needed.
(e) The issuance of Counsel's legal opinion upon the
validity of the assessment proceedings, contracts and
bonds issued to represent unpaid assessments.
Section 2. LEGAL FEES. ror the services described in
Paragraph 1, City agrees to pay Counsel a fee based upon a
percentage of the confirmed assessments as follows:
1 1/2= up to $1,000,000, but not less then $10,000;
1% from $1,000,001 to $2,000,000:
1/23 from $2,000,001 to $5,000,000; and
1 /4E over $5,000,000
The foregoing fee shall be paid from the proceeds of the sale of
bonds, within a reasonable time after sale and delivery of bonds
to a bona fide lirchaser, or, if all assessments are paid in
cash, the foregoing foe shall be paid from the proceeds of the
cash collected, within a reasonable time bfter the and of the
cash collection period.
Section 3. COSTS. Counsel shall pay all out -of- pocket
expenses except for publication fees, filing fees and costs of
printing which shall be paid by City; provided that, if travel
outside of Suutharn California or other extraordinary expenses
are authorized by City, then City shall pay or reimburse Counsel
for costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith.
Section 4. LITIGATION. The fees specified in Suction 2 do
not include any services in connection with the acquisition, by
contract or condemnation, of any casements or other property
necessary for the proposed Improvements or any services in
connection with the validation of the assessment proceedings or
in connection with any other litigation.
Section 5. ABANDONMENT OF BOND ISSUE. If this Bond issue
is abandoned prior to sale and delivery of Bonds, the City shall
not be obligated to pay Counsel any fee for services rendered,
pursuant to Section 2, or to reimburse Counsel for any costa
incurred, pursuant to Section 3. It is expressly understood by
the parties that such fees and costs are contingent upon the
confirmation of the assessment and Sala of Bonds representing
unpaid assessments within the Assessment District.
7
,:-,) (0 3
Section 6. INFORMATION PROVIQrn BY CITY. City agrues to
furnish Counsel evzh maps, records, title searches and other
documonts and procauding:, or corcified Copies tizeraof, as :,v:y bo
required by Counsel in the performance of servicns hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereof have executed this
Agranmant in the County of San Bernardino, State of California,
on the data and year first above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(SEAL)
CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA
Mayor
HAZARER, HARPER, HOPKINS i MCPARLIN
/)
By: L!
Eugene A. Hazare
4
X63
PROFESSIONAL-SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 3rd day of April, 1986,
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter
referred to as 'CITY•) and WIGHT F. FRENCH, INC. (hereinafter referred to as
•CONSULTANT•).
A. Recitals.
(i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal
pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the
preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates for construction of Master
Plan Storm Drains Number 4n and 4p and Assessment Engineering for the proposed
Assessment District 86 -1 ("Project" hereafter).
(ii) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services.
(tit) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional
services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning
Cc,-%ission, City Council and staff in the preparation. of Project.
(10 CONSULTANT represents that it Is qualified to perform such
services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter
defined.
NW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as
follows:
B. Agreement.
1. De *initions: The following definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise
requires:
(a) Project: The preparation of Plans, Specifications and
Estimates and Assessment Engineering for Assessment District 86 -1 described in
Exhibit "A" Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the
preparation of maps, surveys, - eports, and documents, the presentation, both
oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to
CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessinns, oublic hearings
and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined
in the Scope of Services.
(b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to
be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project.
(c) Completion of Project: The date of complet.4n of all
phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plats,
maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations
and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the proje t
acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit 08" Project Srhedule
attachel hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and conplete the
project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicaole with Federal, Staba and
CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to tLe reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSMANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys,
reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"dMments") including all supplemental technical document-, as described in
Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in Projer. Schedule, Exhibit
"8 ". Copies of the documents shall be in such number, as are required by
Exhibit •A ". CITY may thereaifter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions
to said documents as are deeme;+ necessary. CITY shall receive revised
documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY.
The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section B2.(b) may be extended upon
a written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall. at CONSULTANT's sole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other pe -sons as may, In the opinion of
CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the
event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT hereby
earrants that such persons shall be fully c alified to perform services
required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees t • no subcontractor shall be
retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior wr'ttt approval of CiTY.
3. CITY agrees as foliows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum s, of $46,600.00 plus two
percent of confirmed assessments for the performance a •he services required
herpmder. This sea shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other
direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of emiloyees,
consu tants and subcontractors :o CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT. by CITY,
shall ie made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit •A•.
(b) Fecs stipulated in paragraph (a) shal .e paid from
the proceeds of the sal% of bonds, within a reasonable time ii r sale and
deliver) of bonds to a bona fide purchaser, or, if all assessments a paid in
cash, thi• fee shall be paid from the proceeds of the cash collected, +ithi-I a
reasonabli time after the end of the cash collection period.
(c) If assessment proceedings fo• the project Distri are
abandored ,irlor to sale and delivery of bonds, the City shall not be oblig 'ed
-3-
to pay CONSULTANT any fee for services rendered, pursuant to paragraph (a)
above or any other fees explicit or implied as a part of this agreement. It
is expressly understood by the parties that such fees and costs arA contingent
upon the confirmation of the assessment and sale of bonds representing unpaid
assessments within the Assessment District.
4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT:
(a) information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit •A°
hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other
information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary to order to
complete the project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from CITY
files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information
from other govermantal agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be
CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the
gathering of such information.
5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, modeis, photographs and reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY
and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such doavnents and
other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and
material., as CONSULTANT may desire.
-4-
D(. 2
Any use or reuse of the plans and specil'fcatfons except at
the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications
by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents with:4t tht specific written
consent of the CONSLLTANr shall be at the Tole risk of the CITY. ThL CITY
agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CMMULTAXT agiinst all do%-"- ,
claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration
or revision, or use or ruse at another site by the CrTT , its staff or
authorized agents.
6. Termination: This agreement •.y bt :vrataatad by tin upon
the giving of a written -notice of Terminatiou- to WNSIA.TNrr at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination sp�%Iffed in said Notice. In the
event this Agre went is so terminated. COILQR.TANr shall be eonpensated at
CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set fortix in Exhibit •B•, on a pro_
rata basis with respect to the percentage of the proJeC, completed as of the
date of termination. In no event, however, shall CpI51A.T.ANr receive sore C.o'n
the maxfjn specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTUT shall provide to
CITY any and all documents, data, studies, s:.rveys, draw<vgs, apps, models,
photogreohs and reports, whether in dreft or final form, prepared by
CONSULTANT as of date of termination CONSOCTNfr nay not terminate this
Agreement except for cause.
7. Notices and Designated Represe-Itatfves: Any and all
notices, demands, invofzes and written :wyalcations between the parties
hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The belay named
individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the
performance by the parties under this Agreement: Dwight F. French, Inc.,
712 N. Diamond Oar Blvd.. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 and Lloyd D. Hibbs, City
_5-
•7
Engineer, City of P.andm Cucamonga, P. 0. Boa C07, Random Cucamonga. CA 917l0.
Any such notices, demands, invoices tad written cO=Mfcatlons, by gall, stall
be deemed to have been rece;ved by the addressee forty-eight (46) hours after
deyosit thereof the Qvlthd States sail, Postage pmafd and properly
addressed as Set f -h atcve.
13. Insurance: COILWAfT shall neither commence wort under
this r3reement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder la i.
company or cmWanies ncceptable to CM nor shall CMMLTAAT ailw ary
subcontractor to commence work on a subcwtract until all insurance required
of the Subcontractor has been obtained. CMMTAYT shall take out and
maintain at alT times during the term of this Agra3cent the following volicies
of insurance:
(a) Yorker's Cosoensatfon insurance: Wcre beylnnfog
work, C099XTANT shall furnis's to CIT7 > certificate of Insurance as prtnf
that it has taken out fell workers' taq:ensatfon insurance for all persons
rhos it say employ directly or through .ontractors in carrying out the work
specified herein, in accordance with the lams of the State of California.
in accordance with Lea provisions of California Labor Cote
Swtioi 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of crmpemation to his
wleyeas. CORALTAAT prior to consenting work, shall sign and file with CITE
a certification as frliows:
'I as aware of the Provisions of Section 3700 of the Labs Cowie
which require every emplmyer to be insured against liability for workem
compensation or to wdertrice self insurance in accorCmKe with the pro, snons
of thst Code, and I will comply with such provisions before com-nc 9 the
perfor6mKe of the work of this Agreavent'.
CJ Ste/
W Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the
term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual
benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad fora, general public
liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or property damage erasing from CONSULTANTS activities,
providing protection of at least One Million Oollars ($1,000,000.00) for
bodily injury or death to any one por4on or for any one accident or occurrence
and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage.
(c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this ..greement, a policy or policies
V insurance concerning ei^ors and omissions ( "malpractice') providing
protection of at least (NOT APPLICABLE) for errors and omissions
("malpractice") with rpspect to toss arising fret actions of CONS11fANT
performing engineerin7 services hereunder on behalf of CITY.
(d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance
required by expros' provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in
responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of
California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as
additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the
effect that l) the Insurer, Insured ani all sub- . :ontractors waive the right
of subrogation against CVY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees,
and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any
insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they camiot be cahcRiled or
materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to
_7_
c;� 76
CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such
policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the
insurance. CONSULTANT may Effect for its own account insurance not required
under this Agreement.
9. Indemnification: COYSL'LTAtT shall defend, indemnify and
savL harmless CITY. Its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
employees, from all liability from Iasi, damage or injury to persons or
property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any dnd all legal costs and
attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or
willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this
Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the
maxim= extent permitte. by law.
10. Assiam:.nt. No assignment of this Agreement or of any part
or obligation of perfo,mance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in
part, by CONSULTANT rrthout the prior written consent of CITY.
11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that
CONSULTANT and its mrployers, officers and agents are independent contractors
under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be
employees of CITY.
12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the lews of the State of Caii'ornia.
13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is
instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing
party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees
aad costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
-8-
a 7i
14. Entire A reement: This Agreement supersedes any and all
other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect
to the subs —t matter herein. Each party to this Agreement xkm:wledges that
no representation by any party which is not embodied herein vor inv other
agreemert, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be
valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only
if it is in writing signed by all parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above:
CONSULTANT - DWIGHT F. FRENCH, INC.
Date:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO.YGA
Jeffrey King, Kayor Date:
ATTEST:
every , u e e , y erfc Approved as to form:
a 2
y ornoy
FXIl aAa
I' SCOPC OF SERVICES
1
Dwight F. French, Inc. will provide the following services
S
A. Improvement Design
r
I. Prookk all necessary design surveM
't
2. Prepare plan and specifications for the construction of master planned
storm drain 01;
3. Secure necc3wry permits from Caltran and Stn Bernardino Flood Control
and/or Corp of Engineers-,
9. Incapo•.ate muter planned storm drain 4N in spec;fieatlons and bid
doctrsmts.
r B. Assessment Engineering
1
I Review and compile all the cost estimates for the complete project and
wttk with the bond underwriter, attorney, and engnteers to assure that all
costs are accounted for,
2. Prepare assessment districts boundary coassessment rps and asse rolls for the
3. Prepare an ernginters report for the district showing assessment spreader
methods of spread, assessment roll, etc.;
4. Prepare and post the District. We would prepare the , mrriopes for milling
and the city would perform the mailing and advertising.
r
:j
t
:;; -20
EXHIBIT 'B•
SZHEDtnE
Dwight F. French, Inc., proposes to complete all work as follows,
Public lmarm7, to form the district within 90 days of council approval of consultant.
Final plans and receipt of bids within 90 days of the public hearing tormiig the
district.
ON
EXHIBIT "C"
COMPENSATION
Compensation for the work as deserlbed In Exhibit ^A" shall be as follows:
Scope of 5ervlces Item A, Improvement 06-sign $06.600.00
Scope of 5ervlces Item B, Assessment Engineering 2% of tha cmaun: to be assessed
NOTE: All fees contingent upon confirmation of assessments and the delivery of
bond proceeds.
e3�s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT.'
DATE: April y 1986
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director
BY: Olen Jones, Redevelopn:-,nt Anclylt
SUBJECT: REPAYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY IN CONNECTION 'WITH 20% HOUSING SET ASIDE BOND
PROGRAM
BACKGROUND: At the meeting on Much 20, 1986 of the Redevelopment Agency, staff
was aul�izTo proceed with the development of a tax allocation bond program for use
in connection with the 20% Housing Set Aside Program. As a part of that action, stafi
was instructed to develop a Repayment Agreement between the Agency and the City.
EVALUATION: Tax reform legislation currently being considered by Congress Imposes a
number restrictions on tax exempt bond financing, potentially Impacting this Issue
of bonds.
One of these new restrictions would require that 5% of the net bond proceeds be
expenced within 30 days of closing. As a method of dealing with this requirement, bond
counsel has suggested thct the Agency and City enter Into an agreement whereby the
City would advance certain costs prior to the sale of the bond with the understanJing
that, upon the sale, the Agency would reimburse those costs. This method allows relative
prugrom costs to begin accruing now, helping to ensure the 5 %experditur%
Due to the extension of the effective date of tax reform for "essential function b..nds" to
September 1, 19861 this agreement may not become necessary. However, should the 5%
requirement be Imposed, this agreement will assist in prm ling for the necessary
expenses. Both Agency and City a•torneys have reviewed and approved the ogmement.
RECOMMENDATION: The Council wthorize the Mayor to execute a Pepayment
Agreement w t the ancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agen_y relating to a proposed
tax allocation bond Issue by the Agency.
Jock Lam, AICP,
Community Development Director
JL:OJ:kop
Attachment: Repayment Agreement
j /b
REPAYMENT AGREEMENT
Between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Relating to Proposed
Tax Allocation Bond Issue by the Agency
THIS REPAYMENT AGREEMENT is entered this day of 178E,
by and between the Rancho Cucamorga Redevelopment-77g,—n—cy (the " gency" and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga (tie "City"):
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Agency Intends to issue Its tax allocation bonds (the "Bonds") to
provide funds to finance certain public Improvements for the prupose of increasing the
supply of low and moderate housing within the City:
WHEREAS, the public improvements proposed to be financed include many of the
public Improvements described in the exhibit attached to this Agreement;
WHEREAS, the City is willing to pay certain costs of design engineering and
related services with respect to such pt"Ic improvements pending the Issuance by the
Agency of the Bonds and the Agency Is willing to repay the City for such costs from the
proceeds of the Bonds;
NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual promises herein set forth, It is
agreed that the City shall pay applicable costs of design engineering and related services
with respect to those public Improvements -hich the Agency shall thereafter finance
with the proceeds of the Bonds, pending the Issuance by tt"c Agency of the Bonds and the
Agency stroll repay the City for such costs from the proceeds of tte Bonds.
ATTEST:
Secretary
ATTEST:
City Clark
RANCHO CUCAMONGA KEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Chairman
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Mayor
a / %
EIII L IMPRCLWMENT NEEDS
LOW ANO MODERATE is COME PEiGHBORH00D5
OLD ALTA LOMA
Neighborhood No. L.
needed improvements include
Alley between Hellman and ay Hall - general reconstruction of pavement
($17,000)
La Mesa - curb and gutter on both sides of street, driveway aprons will need to be
improvedJprovided; street lights could be provided without too much interference
With existing vegetation and grade•, street paving will need to be
Improved/provided; relocation of water meter /lines ($81,200)
Layton - curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lights, relocation of water meter /limn,
paw'ement rehabilitation ($61,000)
Lomita - complete missing curb 4 gutter and driveway aprons; street lights could
be provided without too much Interference with existing vegetation and grade,
pavanent rehabill :on ($116,200)
La Grande - complete -..:sling curb & gutter and drivmoy aprons; sidewalks could
be provided on one side of street; also street pavement rehabilitation Is needed;
relocation of water meter /lines ($118,200)
ass .
:z
Lo Vine - complete missing curb & gutter and d: ivtway aprons; street lights could
be provided without too .v;c h interference with mdsting vegetation and grade;
sidewalks cwld be provided on one side of the street; also street pavement needs to
be rebuilt; relocetlon of water meter /lines ($98,2DO)
W /si 4- Ameilryst • needs curb and gutter; same widening is needed; sidewalk simuld
be provided, meter relocation ad street lights ($17,OO I
Monte Vista - street pavement, overlay, sidewalk, street lights, complete missing
curb and gutter, relocation of water meta /lines ($142,BOa)
Hellman Avnnse - (from Monte Vista 5 /t) Baseline) - a41), gutter, sidewalks(n),
street lights, CCWD indicates nod for 8• water line am 120 sewer line (City
Improvernents - $540,000; COVDimprovements- $95,000)
Storm Drain Project 02 should precede any Improvements to Heli nan Avenue.
COSTS $1,091,605 for City irprovements
$ 95,000 for CCWO improvements
2
�-2F
f
a�
a,
T M It +
.�
mi ura_:_
m
i
A14H
Lm
LM
hiff
■■z�F {R/,ic�y� .,�� 'L �'�.,� fir.
E�:I a Q
Lf
OLD ALTA LOMA
Neighborhood Pia 2s
needed improvements Include•.
LIo'n , pavement rehabllittotion, street lights (`I/LeGrande not needed), curb, gutter,
and sidewalk spot replocennent ($66,000)
La Ronda - pavement r- habilitation, street lights, curb, gutter, and sidewalk spot
replacement ($50,250)
Rcberds - Pavement rehabilitation, street lights, curb, gutter, and sidewalk spot
replacement ($26,500)
Geiito - spot pavement Improvements, curb, gutter and sidewolk spot
replacement ($3,!50)
Avenida, Leon - pavement rehabilitation, street lights, curb, gutter and sidewalk
spot replrement ($29,500)
Selmo - pavement rehabilitation, curb, gutter and sidewalk spot replacement
($14000)
La Grade - spot pavement improvements, curb, gutter, on2 sidewalk spot
replacement ($7,500)
Eastwood - ;rot pavement ImprovemMts, curb, gutter, and sidewalk spot
replacement ($6,125)
2
c -V
C
Lamito - pavement rehabilitation, curb, gutter, and :;dcwalk spot replacement,
driveway aprons ($9,750)
COST: $220,000 for City improvements
NOTEt Improvements to Hellman Avenue are included in Neighoorhood project OL
C7v
'1
1
j
a.0 ,. TA LOMA
Neighborhood tVa lr
P,
needed improvements include:
i
a
s
}
w
Beryl Avenue - pavement rehabilitation, some street widening, replacement of
sections of existing curb and gutter with water tarrying curb L gutter, infill
6'
i
missing curb and Butler, sidewaik, street 170113, handicap ramps at intersections,
rebrild storm drain catch bn.(n structures
f
i
Beryl between Hamilton and 19th (W /S) - complete street Improvements as needed
S
COST: $335,000 for City Imprrmmer,ts
jX1
L
b'
L
in
!M
vi
1
t
,f
'y5
k
_S
°t .i
01 -D ALTA LOMA
Neighborhood Na, tit
needed Improvements Include:
La Grande- ;avement rehabilitation and street lights, driveway aprons ($20,250)
Agate - pavement rehabilitation, street lights, replacement curb and gutter to
voter carrying curt, and gutter, sidewalk Improvements (where possible), relocation
of water meter /lines (where necesscry) ($119,400)
Roberds - pavement rehabilitation sttr^t lights, replacement of curb and gutter to
water carryirg curb and gutter, sidewalk (where passible); reloeation of water
meter /lines (where n,ncesscry) ($34,375)
Le Vine - pavnmont tehebllftatfoN street lights, replacement of curb and gutter :o
water carrying curb and gutter, sidewalk (where possible); relocation of water
meter /linn (where ne:essary) ($37,625)
Garnet - pavement rehabilitation, street lights, replacement of curb end gutter to
water carrying) curb and gutter, sidewalk (where possible); ru :ocotlon of water
meter /lines ($•54,375)
COSTS $40(4000 for City improvements
1 i0TE: Includes La L ema Court ($12,50:) a d Roberds Caret ($20,625).
6
s
,;J
OLD ALTA LOMA
Neighborhood Nm S (Lemon and Haven Areo}
needed Improvements Includes
curb and gutter spot replacement, payment rehabilitation, street light review, fill
In missing sidewalks, sewer connections probable, driveway aprons (as needed),
relocation of water meter /lines
Halsted Avenue ($39,300)
La Gloria Drive ($19AC0)
Flikins Avenue ($49,700)
Xinlodc Avenue (30,100)
Malvern Avenue ($30,000)
Revere Avenue ($37,200)
LlbertyStreet ($22,200)
Mayberry Avenue ($43,700)
COSTS $271,600 for City Improvements
ags
V
OLD ALTA LOMA
Neighborhood Na. 6 (W /Carnelian between 19th S f)aselinek
needed Improvements Include;
spot curb Ond gutter replacema.t, pavement rehabilitation or replacement (as
appropriate), street light review, filling of sidewalks, sewer comretimns probable,
driveway aprons (as needed), relocation of water meter /lines as required by
sidewalk construction
SOnoma Street ($48,500)
spa A.tnte ($91,500)
Topaz Street ($114,125)
Sierra Vista (46,125)
Roberds Street ($51,750)
Lam. Ito ($10,000)
La Palx Street ($47 175)
LaGrardeStreet ($69,625)
La Vine Street ($41,250)
8
I
Topaz Street ($67,000)
Cameo Street 1552,250)
NordeWtaStrttt ($67,070)
Avoton ($71,875
Jmprr ($165,125)
Sard Street and Holly Court (574750)
CaneoStreet ($26,250)
Hamilton ($38,125
lil4wnette ($22,000)
Holy Street ($24250)
AnbaroodOrhv ($40,825
19th Street ($74000)
CAST, $1,247,750 for City improvements
..
I
17 5lxmiwtsrutcAMOwcn
�+dsborlroed.Na.1:
,neededimprovements irslade:
t k JJTrAm - 21reet.widcmng in vicinity of Arrow Highway one Calle Velar
ISS11 25)
rSml)eySjar Street lights, replace -mb and gutter, drainage culvert, sidewalks
» as ldereDrn fhabllitetiantisheet.yavemmts, =I-de soc bulb by park at west e..9,
- rst osnlionaf avotermetefilines(wberenecasary) ($163,625)
A AwalsO.lm n. -Salle Nejar sidewalk to Arrow, street lights, replace curb and
grster. :dmiaogexulvert,- rrJgbllitatian of pov rent, "I -do-sae bulb; relocation of
wraterrmetedlines1whereneomcry) ($40,17
[dSorrtedi -s:met rgat.;rsk(Cul.dosacbulb) ($'x,900)
AAU" -br-I yeeAmenI l,eonsad Hdknm. Av - regrading and paving, ($22,250)
CCM- : _53Z%Mfar'Cityimmovements
10
r
t
L
! wi
MH
J.
FG
7
r '
SOUTHWEST CUCAMONGA
17EIGHBORHOOD NO. I
II U
,r
I.Q.P.
i�
SOUBMES;CUCAMONGA
Ne!ghborhood No. 2s
needed improvements include:
Cataveas - curb, gutter end sidewalk, street lights as needed, undergrounding
.tillties if Possible, Pavement rehabilitation, Install 8" water and sewer line
($63,750) (CCWD improvements. $40,000)
S/5 91h Street - street lights, a.Tb, gutter and sidewalk, pavement rehabiPtiation,
upgrade water line to 8" to Vineyard, Install 8" sewer line to Baker ($65,125)
(CCWD impro"ments - $200,C00)
Vinmar - street lights, curb, gutter and sidewalk, pavement rehabilition, install 8"
sewer line ($63,750) _
Sierra Madre - street lights, curb and gutter, sidewalk, Pavement rehabilitation;
may need cul-de -sac bulb, ($70,000)
alley _ maintenance grading and base pave ($8,200)
COST: $270,800 for City Improvements
$240,000 for CCWD improvements
NOTE: CC%VD plans may be available for both water and sewer work; laterals and
Individual connections additional ($3500 /connection).
II
a5-s
V
_,.,_ � e
;OUTMVEST CUCAMONGA
N •oghbo• hood No, 3:
need, d improvements include:
WS 9113 Street - ctrb gutte• and sida••alu, street repavement, street lights,
unpergrmnd utilities, upgrade water line to 8" to Vineyard, install 8" sewer line to
Baker ($82,000)
Sierra Mode - pavement rehabilitation, curb and gutter rehabilitation, sidmvciks,
driveway aprons, street lights as needed, sewer conneetio,�s, relocation r• water
miter ($34,400)
Salina- p•vement rehabilitation, sidewalks, driveway aprons, street light •s: Ceded,
sewer connections, relxa•ion of w:ner ^•eter /lines ($20,400)
Edwin MC/91h) - cross gutter needs rebuilding, curb and gutter mainterare,
slurry seat of pavements ($12,600)
Celoveras - curb, gutter and sidewalk, street lights and driveway aprons as needed,
underground utilities if possible, sewer connections, relocation of water
mete. /lines; street rehabilitation ($53,400)
s
12
Vinmar - pavement rehabilitation as needed, sidewalks, driveway aprons, street
lights as needed, replace curb return at Vinmar & Salina (NcC), sewer connections
(110,000)
S/S Arrow Highway (from Cclaveras to Baker) - curb, gutter, sidewalks, pavement
widening, street lights, uneergrounding of utilities, reloconon of water
meter /lines ($131,300)
COST: $344,100 for City Improvements
w
13 r
SOMMYEST CUCAMONGA
Neighborhood No. 4:
needed improvements Include:
Array Highway (from Baker, east to Flood Control) - complete improvements in
front of existing homey minimal widening of undeveloped lots w /AC berm,
underground utilities, curb, gutter, sidewalk, relocation of water meter /lines (where
necessary) ($257,100)
Baker (from 8th Street to Foothill) - complete improvements in front of existing
homes, minimal widening, street rehabilitation ($315,600)
COST: $572,700
140TE: Storm Drain Project No. 4 should be completed prior to street ingrovem, .ts.
.f
w
-j
14
3 C) t�
�e
501,11TIOMST (:VCAMGN- -A
Nclghborhocd No. S:
needed 'mprcvements Inchuae:
Sierra Medra - curb, gutter cod sidewalr, street rehntilitat.w, driveway carom;
look at street light spacing, sewer conre^.tiry rLiccaa ^n of water meter /Imes;
upgrade water line fo 10- from Arrow to Footh It ('106,7't)) (CCWD untpt nemeots
-$60,000)
Avenida Velar - curb, gutter and eeev cik, street rehabilitati,n, look at street light
spacing' driveway oprcns, •ew:r Connections, rclocation cf water meter /lines
($117,400)
P)o_ida - curb, gutter, and sidewalk, street rehahilitntirN !auk a: street light
spacing, driveway jpron+, s -.wer cvnnmtio.v, relocation of water meter /lines
($3S,400)
Via Cer(llo - curb, gutter and side%all., street rehebiliiatioN look of street 11pht
spocing, dr)vewoy nprens (nor be able .o as street trees if parkway Is established),
sewer cumectlons, relocatioa of water meter /lines ($33,500)
WS Arrow Highway (tram &.kor west almost to Gram-) - Complete Improvement'
In rr it of kaisting homes, minima: widening of undeveloped lots w /AC berm,
undr. groundi•tg u,lilities, curb, gutter and sidewalk ($I6S,000)
LAST: $'160.000 for City Improvements) $60,000 for CCWD improvements
15
3a.)-
a
SOUTHWEST CUCAMONGA
Neighborhood No. 6:
needed improvements include:
Tapia Via (already committed to CDSr,, Progrcm if furf„n� cvoiloble) -o rte gutter.
sidewalk, pavement rehab, street lights, relocct,on of water meta /lines ($100,400)
Raneherla (already committed to CDSG pogrom if funding available) - curb,
gvtler, sidewalk, street lights, pavement rehub, relocation of water meter /tines
($IS0,100)
COST: $250,500 for City improvements
i
,
16
30Y
NORTH TOWN AREA
needed Improvements include:
Humboldt Avenue - sewer connection by Turner Avenue - no sewer line exists at
present time on a portion of Humboldt Avenue
COST, $IS,ODO for CCWD improvements
NOTES Storm Drain Project 03 would need to be done In order for the Humboldt sewer
line to be installed.
17
3D �
c''
-., — 1
r file
os
OP l
>
FC
n.... t I •{ �lil' ` i. ,. •'� I.S.P.
i�
M --� GC
ry
—JL /
nrl
u voP
� � ■mil
I � I
r'."' -- r 0 ■� ,; Future City
Q p " Hail
■
FC MH p
P M I. ■ t
■ GC p�j -_
GC
IL ,. •. - p� P
w �t 1Y1 1 NORTH TORN AREA
I ` L
T iI:
an Jig
r
CENTRAL CU.
CAMONCA
Neighborhood No, h
needed improvements include:
Devon - pavement rehab(I:totion, street lint review, curb and gutter spot
replacement, driveway aprons needed, sewer connection, ($63,000)
Ramon - pavement rehabilitation, street light review, curb and gutter spot
ruplacement, delveway aprons needed (Note: curb and gutter replacement work is
more extensive on this street as compared to others In the n.ighborhood.), sewer
connections ($37,500)
Rnmono - (East Side, between Hompshire 3 Foothill) - curb and gutter and purkwoy
beautification ($12,000)
Horrvahire - pavement rehabilitation, street light review, curb and gutter spot
replacement, driveway aprons needed, sewer connections ($05,000)
Surgondy - pavement rehabilitation, street light review, curb and gutter spot
replacement, driveway aprons needed, sewer connecticro ($37,500)
Malvern - pavement rehabilitation, street light review, curb and }utter spot
replacement, driveway aprons needed, sewer conne_tions ($37,500)
Lcrdon - pavement rehabilitation, street light review, curb and gutter spot
replacement, driveway aprons needed, sewer connections ($37,500)
COST: $290,000
18
31'z
r 'il I I i
h • • rOJTW L
11.1
i
r
IL
5 RTC
CENTRAL CUCAMONGA T
NEZGRBORhOOD 110. 1 n
GC�� •Il)w »N..
�.
n
h '
n 11
.P,
1�
• n. �o I
36s
CENTRAL. CUCAMONGA
Nc(ghbo6" No. 2:
needed Improve,nents Include:
Stafford - curb arx gutter replacement, pavement rehab or replaced (as
oppreor.ote), street light review, sidewalks, drivewo, aprons (es necdod). This area
now has sewer lines however some of the hones are still as septic fanks.
COmeetian war': may alul be possible. ($141,700)
Malvern - curb and gutter rn:'acer:.tnt, pavement rehabilitation or replaced (as
appropriate), street light review, sidewalks, driveway aprons (as needed),
connection to sewer system may be possible. ($20,700)
Dorset - curb and gutter replacement, pavement rehabilitation or replacement as
appropriate, street light review, sidewalks ?, driveway aprons (as needed),
connection to sewer system may be possible, ($142,600)
Ellen - curb and gutter replacement, pavement rehabilitation or replacement (as
appropriate), scree light review, sidewalks ?, driveway aprons (as needed),
connection to sewer system may be possible. ($145,400)
Norwick (to Kinlock) - curb and gutter replacement, pavement fehobilitat!an or
replacement (as appropriate), street light review, sidewalks ?, driveway aprons (m
needed) ($147,600)
19
i
Ashford (<inlocx to Center) - curb and gutter replocement, pavement rehabilitation
or repla:e nent (cs appropriate), street light review, sidewalks ?, driveway aprons
(as needed) ($64,000)
Center Street O'oothill Blvd, to Ashrort St.) - genercl pavement reconstruc'lon
($43,500)
COST: $711,500 for City improvements
Wj
20
31
Y
� �'��111� • �llp�l�Ri�a � M�.
■! '"' do ■ 1111 0�� Y� `
I
CENTRAL c NEIGHBORHCO � ••
VVI
11 j
r
II
ETIWANDA AREA
Neigh'sorhood No. 1:
needed Improvements include:
Curb and gutter spot replacement, pavemr t rehabilitation or replacement (as
appropriate), street light review, sidewalks, sewer connections may be possible,
driveway aprons (as needed)
COST: ;175,000
NOTE: Plans are available for immediate constructlon
21
3/3
ETIWANDA AREA
Neighborhood No. 2:
needed improvements include:
Curb and gutter spot replacement, pavement rehabilitation or replacement (cs
appropriate), street light review, sidewalks, sewer connections may be passible,
driveway aprons (as needed)
COST: $65,500
22 p
ETIWANDA AREA
Neighborhosd No. 3:
needed improvements include:
Curb and gutter spot replacement, pavement re:gbilitation or replacement (as
appropriate, street light review, sidewalks, sewer conreations may be passible,
driveway aprons (as needed)
COST: $265,600 for City Improvements
,h
.N "i
a,
23
=Sa°
:.. Aka
FC C'
E.S.P.
❑
❑ C3�
13 ❑ GC��� l+
■uGO 13 j: �•
Ai 1. .
Q °❑
t1F D
I
LL-7 C
ETIWANDA AREA \ .�
+ NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 3
i
1 7
STORM DRAINS
Project D)
Turnerl`iermoso Storm Drain
Location:
Foothill, go N /on Turnery crossing Baseline and ends just N /19th (ties Into
existing Alto Loma Channel)
Crest:
1 Storm Drain $4.5 million
Widening of Turner $1.5 million
s;
Source of Possible Funding:
City General Fund (no contribution has yet been mode)
Dev. Drainage Fund (from Fees) ($100,007 yr. fund)
Gas Tax available for Turner widening only
Relief Area sited for North Town Area between Arrow & 8th on Turner
Avenue by virtue of storm flow diversion
Project Time:
Project would take 1.5 years to design and construct
24
319
' t
NOTES:
I Death has occurred at Turner /Feron due to flood problems
8 Cars hove been washed away due to flooding in this area
Project 92
Lower Portion of the Upper Hellman Avenue Drain
Location:
Start at Conte Vista on Hellman, go She SPRR, then W /olong RR til It hooks
up to Cucamonga Creek at Carnelian.
Cost:
Storm Drola - $2 mhllon
Design work has been :or: ole:ed for work between Monte Vista and SPRR.
This will allow fo. increased cupoclty In existing County storm drain.
Project Time:
Project wouln take 4 ma to complete design; 8 mo, construct.
Comments:
CCWD tics parallel sewer end water line that cannot be completed until
storm !rain Is complete (Old Alto Loma Neighborhood No, 2).
25 - ".
Project 03
Lower Turner Avenue Drainage System
Location:
Begin at Deer Creek E /Turner & N /8th Street. Fallen Humboldt Avenue to
Turner, N /on Turner to Feron; W /on Feron to Rancho Cucomongo Middle
School; then N /through school to Ramono Avenue; then Won Ramona to
Arrow (end).
Cosh
$2.5 million
Project Time:
9 me. design; 9 me. construct.
Comments:
Project 03 will not be 100`Yo successful unless Project 01 is completed.
Primary relief will be of school site. Routing and /or scheduling Is dependent
upon Possihie co,ntruction of proposed development which is south of Feron
Avenue Hawkins).
r
y�
c.
h -i
26 : »,
Project 04
Bcker /Arrow Drain
Location:
Begins S /Foothill at Baker; goes South to Arrow. then E /to existing
Cucamo•vgo Creek Channel (W/Vineyard)
Cast-.
$1 million
Project Time:
3 ma design; 6 mo. construct
Comments:
Property damage to tomes (3 flooded) on Biker would be protected with this
Improvement.
VICINITY
MAP
Le
01PROJECT 11
•^—�
°�/
f�
/
hJ
r
PROJECT 12
•
r.
PROJECT 13
t
� PROJECT
i4 �. F
�'•4
iI
�t 3 4
d
ar..y nn +.um..rur,
•
T
y
tn,•
`
Cn'y OF nA1N71b7 CI:C.f4f)" A
M:
SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS
BY NEIGHBORHOOD STORM DRAIN PROJECT
NEIGH130RHOOD PROJECTS:
Old Alto Lomu
—
Me ghburhood No, 1
1 091,600
No.2
220,000
N0.3
385,000
No.4
400,000
rim 5
271,600
No. 6
1 247 750
Old Alta Lama Subtotal
Southwest Cucamonga
Neighborhood No.I
325,525
rim 2
510,800
No, 3
344,100
No.4
572,700
No, 5
540,000
No, 6
5 250,500
Southwest Cucamonga Subtotal
$ 2,543,625
North Town Area
15,000
North Town Area Subtotal
$ 15,000
Central Curnmon__o
Neighborhood No.I
$$ 290,000
No.2
5 711.500
Central Cucamonga Subtotal
$ 1,001,500
Etiwarda
Neighborhood No, 1
175,000
No.2
65,500
No, J
5 265,600
Etiwanda Subtotal
506 ICO
TOTAL for all Neighborhoods
$ 7,682,175
STORM DRAIN PROJECTS:
,
Project 01 (Turner/Hermoso)
$6 MILLION (can be phmed)
Project 02 Hellman Avenve)
2 MILLION
Project 03 (lower Terner Ave.)
2.5 ,MILLION
Project 04 (Baker /Arrow)
I MILLION
TOTAL for all Storm Drains
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS:
1 500 000
9, 82,
y:
,
+ •.ems
:- it
nrmv nt. n A wtrvn rr TPA ArnaTC A
STAFF REPORT
Date, April 2, 1986
Tot Cit Council and City Manager
From- J t, Administrative Services Dirontor
Subjects C General Liability Coverage
2� 7n
u ei
Staff has been diligently pursuing avenues to obtain general liab.lity insurance
eovorage for the City Cr. avenue purevad was pooling. It ,so discovered
pools already in existence .mare n,•t accepting new members, therefore, our only
option appeared to be joining a new pool Unfortunately, rot many new pools
are being developed. Staff has, however, identified one peel that looks via-
ble for the City to join.
The California Municipal Insurance Authority (CMIA) is a State wide pool that
Is being formed by Marsh L McLennan (a reputable insurance brokerage firm) tw
Insure cities for general liability exposures through the pooling concept. On
the face of it, the CMIA program looks very attractive and wou.d be worth the
City pursuing.
I am recommending that a committee comprise, of Mayor King and Councilmember
Buquet, duo to their lnvolverent in the liability field on a daily basis, tte
City Manager, City Attorney aid f, be developed to review the Marsh r. McLennan
program and make a decision ralarding tho City's participation
I would aex the Council to do -egato authority to Mayor King and CounciLmember
Buquet to make an initial decision with the understanding CouncLl'e full rati-
fication will be done at a later date The reason for the request to allow
the authority to make An initial decision is by April 15, 1986, the initial
premium meet be paid and by fay 1, 1986, the City must decide if it wants to
participate in the pool If we pay the pcemlum and do not participate the
premium would be refunded to us.
MECOK- ENOATIONt
Council authvrize the committee eppointmenta as outlined and authorize the
Council representatives to make J decision pending full Council ratification.
JM /t]
� pit 4
. ti
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
a c
o
DATE: April 2, 1986 :m
TO: City Council SPA City ::;00, I
FROM: Lloyd Bubbs, City Engt
SUBJECT: AE FCR I MATIOM OP ASSESSIW DISTRICT 86"1 - I
'-
Subsequent to preparation of the rouncil agenda, staff has been in
Zof the Bond UrNmwitcr's Agreement, &M additional property
ownors' petition and the project boundary reap. This information is
supplemental to your ,re ious Council packet. The Stone and Youngberg
agyreement follows previous agreesants on other Districts done in the
C1ty. Staff recomnds approval of the agratmtnt.
LNlJr
AttaChoents
STONE & YOUNGBERG
■n.ao. Pane srou VKHeear
March 61 1986
=, Council
City of Rancho Caaaswnga
City Hall
9320 6cse Line Road
P.O. Hoc $07
Rancho Cucaron9e, CA 91730
Has City of RancM Cucamonga improvement Hoods
Stan Drain Asgesgeent District
Dear Members of the City Councils
This letter will serve as an agreement between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and atone A Youngberg to serve as Hanging
Underwriter to the City until the parties enter into an actual
Purchase Contract regarding the negotiated ppsale of the City9s to be impror sent Actdof 1915 (the t&Onndi j andyt60 Procedural Act of
1313.
You have Informed us that the City Intends to issue the Honda to
y ^!de funds to finance various public improvements and for
this purpose rp"rss the services of a Managing Underwriter to
etructure the financing and to enter into a Purchase Contract
Act Ia agreeable to both parties.
As Mouginyy Underwriter, we will age our utmost efforts to raise
funds at tbQ moot reasonable rates attainable in the market
under then existing conditions, in amplification of the
underatanfing between the City and the Managing Underwriter,
Stone a Youngberg agrees to undertake the below - listed services
an6 functions.
A. BLIIiGLatlpa the Tinanaine,
1. Stone a Youngberg will work with vur staff in developing
the Saops of the financial feasibility and assessing the
marketability of tte project.
2. alone a Youngberg will work with tho City's bond
counsel recommending specific tea.= Ind conditions
affecting the basic security of tae Bonds.
erat MMKINAae.men a n• wesourwaonexsomnAtrm• Wes mscm
City Council
City Rancho Cucamonga
March 6, 1906
Page -2-
3. Stone i Youngberg will propare the test of an offering
memorandum for sale of the securities. Said memorandum
will include a description of the bonds and their
security, and pertinent financial and economic data.
In preparation of such prospectus# we will exercise due
diligence in the ascertainment of all mef:eriai facts
and circumstances regarding the project and their
disclosure in the prospectus,
a. Stone a Youngberg will be present at any necessary
information meeting or meetings.
S. If the City so requests, we will &moist in arranging
the selection of a paying agent.
nTtTT T1 T%Tr".
1. The Managing Underwriter wil: use its best efforts to
accomplish the formal saiketing at the earliest data
Possible consistent with sound investment banking and
underwriting principles. It is Sntwnded that, once,
Mrchasad by r't•�ne a Yocngbor , the bonds will be ra-
t, Cored to the yublie on the basis of an iawdiate
'bona fide Public offering.' Stone s Youngberg MAY
form a group of investment banking firms for the
purpose of underwriting and selling the bonds.
2. Stone a Youngberg will submit an offs- to the City t,
purchase the bonds at least three working days prior
to the final confirmation of the assessments, subject
to Seztinent resolutions, the offering Memorandum, and
all other Drosses rryy documents, approvals, and
at &dings govoraing snob bonds lavinq be determined
by hood counsel, the City, and the Managing
Underwriter satisfactory in all rempetts for financing
purposes. I!, after negotiations with Stona a
Youngberg In good faith, the City and Stone a
Youngberg fail to agree on terms of sale o! the hands,
the City say terminate thin agreement, thefn offer the
bonds for Dale to others.
C. Genera I Proyinloe< Relating to the City AnA thL.02AS aQ
yndfinmLtere
1. The City agrees to cooperp':e with Stone G Youngberg to
make available copies of economic and financial
i
City Council
City Rancho Cucamonga
March 6, 1916
Page -3-
reports, agreements, contracts, resojutions, and other
relavaut documents pertaining to the project, the City
or the bonds as reasonably nay be required from time to
time for prompt and efficlent• performance by Stone i
Youngberg of their obligations hereunder.
Z. Stoma a Youngberg shall pay its own out -of- pocket and
other expeasea, the cost of the ?reparation of the
Offering Nemorandom, Underwriter a Counsel, Slme Sky
and Intemtnsat Memoranda used by the Underwriters and
all advertising exponsss in connection with the public
offering of the bonds.
3. The City cha11 pay from the proceeds of the bonds or
Other funds of the City all costs and expenses
custol%arily paid therefrom, including the cost of
printing the bonds, and other documents, the toes and
oxpenses of its 1e941 counsel, bond counsel,xpe
retained by the city insconnection with the financing.
d. It is expressly understood and agreed and the City
hereby recognixem that in performinq its actiriti�s
pursuant to a negotiated ssle that Stone i Younggberg is
acting solely on its own behalf as the prospactive
manager of an underwriting group which plans to submit
to the City a proposal to purchase the bonds for
resale. Nothing herein shall be construed to make the
Managing Underwriter an esployoe or financial, fiscal,
or other advisor of the City or to " tablish any
fiduciary relationchip between the City and the
Managing Underwriter.
3. Thin agreon*nt shall extend to the date of sale of tho
bends e9 contemplated herein, when tae formal bond
Purchase Contract Le entered into by the parties.
6. The City may terminate this agreement if, of "ev
negotiaticna in good faith, the City and Utone i
Youngberg f6il to agree of mutually acceptable terms of
sale o. the bonds. Upon teiuinatinn of this agreement,
the City shill be under no further obligation to the
Manang Unlerwriter hereunder, except that the City is
obligagi ted to Pay to the Managing Underwriter any
expenses incurrei on behalf of lb• City pursuant to
City Council
City of Rancho Cucauonga
Rarch 6, 1936
Page -4-
Faragrurh C(4) of this agreement -hould the City not
sell the bonds to the Managing Ondervriter on belalf of
the andeniriters pursuant to section a of this
agreement.
constitute anagtsem"Rt betweenbthe Cityiand thr, Undersigned.
Accepted ebis day of , 1936
City of an,-_Cactmonna
6yt
CERTIFICATE R8 ADEQDACy
OF
PETrZIOH
Vjzj 1 ;14 y
I, DWIGHT r. FRENCH, hereby certify as follows:
1. That Z an the duly appointed and acting Engineer of
Hark for
i ASSESSMENT DIu =CT NO. 66 -1
Of the City Of Rancho Cucasonga (the "Assessment District").
3. That I have roceivad and reviewed a Petition for the
con '% of improvements rind waiver of re erants of
Division 4 of the streets and HighwaYa Cade signed by owners oZ
property within the Assessment D.striet.
3. T.4at the Petition has been signed by the owners 3f more.
than 60% in area of the property subject to the assessment for
the proposed tmprovements Within the Assessment Oistrict.
4. That the "owners of land" Ara thoeW persons Who, st the
tine the Fatitioi vas filed With the City Clark, appear to be
such owners upon `ho County Assessor's Roll, or, in the case of
transfers of land, sDpDyear to be such ovnerp on the records in the
County Assessor's Offica.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true
and correct. It
Executed this �day of k7z",Z, 1066, atLle.s.L
California.
DwraHT F. FRENCH, INC.
Ey:
Ovight Y. French
Engineer of Work
TO: C-=1 or R.L`1C.°O C..C.L'(ONGA
P ==C:t y0R = CZN3:RCC7-OY or r.".PP.Cv= LT..:S
F:tD A.1-.= or R_CC:R_,:^-.t'L's OP D17- -SCC:t 4 OF
S =°4:S .1:10 H1G.Td.1'LS COOS or
S ^.1^_' OF C1Lr�OAlrt1
MM =3!G'=' being ewro_ -s of propa_rv1 w!.t iZ `tea as
as shown on the plat atrAchad to and =ada a part of thia 7 -iticn
A.
Sas ExhLbit ".1 ", which p:opa_ -_y will ba subject to assess- -c for
the lnpreveants hereinafter descibad, hereby request the 'Lty
to institita proceedings u-.dar the "tknie!pal L- ;rave_ ant Act of
1913 ". being Division 12 of the St -sate and Highways Code, to
construct carain public works and it•,prova:ents and acqu! =it -•ens,
it nacesaa- -y, generally dancihed as followst
construction and installation of drainage ioprova-
nents together with appurtenances and appu--anant
work, aequisitien, it aaeassarr, and inn dental
expenses in eoanaetion tharowith
(the "r=prov4= ants ").
2'8: MIDMIGIt)31 further request ranch other appurtenant wo -k
that, in too opinion of the Cite, nay be neeesna. -f to properly
affact•:ats the raprova =ants.
we OnD=SXGM further request that the City rake the
das!gnatlons specified as follows:
1 The argL- eer(s) desigcatod to asv: =o the respon-
. ribilitlas and pecfors tha duties of hasass =ant
E..g!naer for toe us.sa- -ant District shall be
,r,a, -= T. F=C3, =C.
(the - .1ane69Ant iagiaeer "), subject to approvai
of an 74,�raetart ::or E g'_�oerS�; Serricaa.
2. The urdar aStar desig=tad to ;==haze bcrs
raprssa:`.ing Unpaid assess --ants in the aaa"aa =ent
District shall be
S.O:IE G YOO:IGmG
(the "6rda_ritar "), subject to app °val of a Pur chase
Agraament.
2. The attzrnay(s) designated as Lo: C_--u:sal for tha
assessment yzocaadirgs shall be
3L1:ARM HARM. HOpE..I*` S 6 xa AAr-=
(the "Fond Counsel ") , subject to apgroval of an
agrsamant for Lord CoU:tesl Srrvieas.
Tim UIMMXG:nM further request that all efforts and
attempts be made so that assessment preuedSAgs can be init".ated
and the Resolution of Intention can be adopted at the earliest
time.
MM G:m=SZT.MD furl or agroa that the city will incur no
ootigation for the paysant of any corsultir; so--7ices wless
there is a successful cong _4—Aticn of assess=ent and gala of
bonds.
TS3 D:n7E:L4:GNm exprassly vaiva the p•rocead'� ;s :.rd all
13ltations Under the "Special Assasamant :nveatigation,
LL- Station and Majority Protast act of 1931 ", beinq Division 4 of
the Streets and HSL7hways Cede.
THIS PE ^T:03 MAY BL SI6:RD ^t. COV=ERP '" AHD CO:IST^D=-3
o:IE PET'^:0:1 ' +0 vA--=, aND Ha'l BE CC:ISOL:DATED HITR S -Mr-AR
P- MITZO:IS A= wAI7'd4 7OR S=CIAR LYPAOCE:C:ITS BF.t' Y�I ICPLSCItEO.
2.
4
Roulln L. Rorsts A} No 7-U
Aks Rorsl/s L. Johnson �6S 07 f— 1L�7CJ
O
S.
4
�aA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO
REDIMLOPMENT AGENC
MEMORANDUM
DATE, April 2, 1486
TOt O winnan and Members of the Redwelwly Agency
FROMt Lounn M. Wasserman, City
By, Jack Lang AICP, Deputy Exeeati Direztor
SUBJECTn ISUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTWCT PROGRAM
At th Agency mooting on Mach S, 14K, the board requested staff to
ppreps•
in an business Improvement districts. Staff Is currently
In th procm, of collecting Information and reviewing existing business
Improvement districts from other rnnmunitles that am aimed at ertumcing
existing busirwssea.
Upon recelpt and review of thus districts, a parpecilve of existing
programs as %well as a dlwusslon of valor_% rAtrnattw methods will ba
presentad to the board A report Is anticipated to be ready for the Agency
mee'ing of M,ty 7, 1486. The report will be desaipth» In naurs but will
outline the general steps In dewloptng a program and present the policy
Issues associated with such a program. Agar the Agency's review and
discussion of this report, staff would Implertwtt whottrver policy dirsction
the Agency board decidss upon.
JL/k p
.n'
ReVLSiD CcivS�+JT'
CITY OFF ANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
ot.TE: April 2, 1986 an
T0: City Coundl and City we gar
FR M: Lloyd 8. Nubbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: Approval of acceptance of Alta Loma Store Drain (AD 84-2) as
complete red authorize the ?fling of a Notice of Completion for the
wort
The Alta Loa Store Drain (AD 84-2) Project has been completes to the
satisfattia: of the City Engineer. It is rs.^mmended that the Concil approve
the acceptance of the project, authorize the f aril payment and dfract the City
Enfinaer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release
pt,dorSMS aunty (51,9286190.00) and retention (198,002.11).
RECOIBENOATION
It is recowwWed that Cowil accept As complete the Alta Lama Stone Drain
(AD 84-2) Project and pass the attached resolution authcrizing the City
Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and release the faithful perfoivnnce
bond and retention (35 days after filing Notice of Completion) and authorze
final payment.
Respectfully subItted,
r.
as
Attachment
r
Y
ry�y~Y
pliy.
k
e
I
Odista Cewfeei7`
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIIGA
STAFF REPORT
DALE: April 2, 1986
TD: City Council and City Manager
FRfM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City "Ineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Senior public Wrks Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agr* rant with Neste, Brudin i
Stone, Inc. for the performance of professional services with
respect to construction managansnt, inspection Lid staking for
North Town - Phase 19 and Turner Avanue faprovuent Projects for
the amount of $32,000.00 to be funded from MO and 04s Tax Funds
In conjunction with the subject projects, consulting services are required for
inspection and surveying. Neste, Gr din i Stone has SUL�ettted a roobined
proposal of $29,696.00 for services necessary to cover subject projects.
RECOM E MATIOM
It is recommended that City Council accept the proposal from Neste, Brudin Z
Stone, execute the Profesniatsl Services Agreements, and authorize the Finance
Director to expand $32,000.00 (combined proposals of $29,096.00 plus 52,904.00
contingencies) for said services to be funded from HUD and Gas Tax Funds.
Respectfully subnitt ,
f;� I r I
LB8. - 3 !%(14q
PROFESS10M SERVICES AMSEtar
This AgrecDant Is nude and entered into this
19 , between the City of Rancho CucMnga, a Wmiclpot
Corporation (h¢roteafter referred to as •CITY• and _.
— N�sta /rrdln d
Stone ( hereinafter referred to as
CCtiSULTAtiT•).
A. Recitals.
(f) CITY has lvretoforo issued its Request for Proposal
p¢rtafnfn� to the perforeahce of professional services with respect to
constrL:tfen management, fnaFectfon and staking fir North Torn - Pbcae IV
and Turner AYenoe ?mproeement Projects (•Project• hereafter).
(11) CONSULTANT has aow submitted its proposal for the
perforsonce of such servttes.
(111) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional
services necessary to render adrfce and assistance to CITY, Clty Council and
staff in the comptotefen of Project.
(IV) CONSULTMT repro„ s that 1. Is queifffod to Perform such
serrfces and is willing to perform suck profesatonai tervltas as hereinafter
defined.
N677, THEREFORE, it is agreed by aad between CITY and COnsuLTANT as
follows:
R. A raemant.
1. Ceftnnps; The following definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except whole the content of this Agreeaewt otherwise
requires.
-I: -
(e) Project- Construction ganayaeent, InspectfCn and Staking
described to Exhibit "A' Scope of Services hereto Including, but as limited
to, the preparation of impt. Servoys, reports, and documents, the
presentatten, both oral and in writing, of such plans, naps, swrvoys, reports
and ducwtents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions,
public hearings end other LxeetinSs Conducted by CiTY with respect to the
Project as outlined in the Scope of Services.
(b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to
be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project.
(C) Completion of Project: The date of Completion of all
phases of the project, fncludinr any and all procedures, deralopernt plans,
maps, surveys, plan documents, technic&' rex,rts, FtNtings, aril presenratlons
and attendance by CONSULTANT at rva,ic hearirgt regarding the project
acceptance is sat forth In Exhibit 'B" Project Schedule attaUAd hereto.
2. C07SULUNT agrees ss fallout:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the
project In accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal State and
CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, ati to the reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply originals of all maps,
surreys, reports. Plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"documents') including all supplepentat tscWcal docuaents, as described in
Exhibit "A' to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit
'B'. Copies of the documents shall be In such rcimbers as are raquired"by
Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to C0MTAliT cometets
-2-
-X Ya A? j >, �r,n
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter cake such revisions
to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised
t
} docuaents In such fora and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY.
The tia'a limits set forth pursuant to this Section 62.(b) may be extended upon
e written approval o. CITY.
(:) CMLSULTA:IT :h3i1, at CC'ISULTAYT's sole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, In the opinion of
CONSULINIT, be necessary Li comply with the tens of this Agreement. In the
event any suet other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, MISULTANT hereby
warrants that such persons ciuill be fully qualified tc perform services
required hereunder. COMMIT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by COMULTANT• except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT the sum outline in Exhibit W
for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover
the cost of all staff time and ails other direct and indirect costs or fails,
i including the work of employees, consultants and subcontrectors to
CONSULTANT. Paypent to CONSULTANT, by CITY. stall be Lade in eccordance with
the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C•.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be aide by CiTY in
accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and
such Invoices stall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are
received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C• either with
respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no
k #i
event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of Individual task totals
f
described In Exhibits W and `C'.
'u
' (c) CONSULYANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be
required ti pay to CONSULTANT any sun in e:.cess of 95% of the maxiawa payable
hereunder prior to receipt by CiTY of all final documents, together with all
supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and
} content to CITY. Final
payment shall be nude not later than 60 days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services3 Paynen•ts for additional services
frequested, In writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as
sat forth In Exhibit W hereof, shall ba pdd on a reimbursement basis in
i
` accordance wit' ..0 fee schedule set forth M Exhibit ICO. Charges for
r
additional services shall to Invoiced on c monthly bests and shcli be paid by
CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are neatved br CITY.
' 4. CITY aarees to provide to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as sat: forth to Exhibit *Ae
berate.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of ups and other
information, if available, which COKSULTMIT considers necessary to order to
complete the project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from CITY
files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, In obtaining information
from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be
CONSULTANT's responsibility to sake all initial contact with respect to the
gathering of such tnfaraution.
.4-
S. Ownership of Documents: Ail documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, Maps. Models, photographs and reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY
and, upon payaant for services perfornac by CONSULTANT, seth documents and
other identified Materials stall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT May, however, Make and retain such copies of said documents and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire.
Any use or reuse of the plans and specif5cationt except at
the sit* tatonded or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications
by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written
consent of the COISUL1ANT slell be at the sole risk of tlxt CITY. The CITY
agrees to hold harmlest and Indemnify the CONSULTANT against a!1 damages,
claims and lassos including defense costs arising uut of any such alteration
or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CI -Y , its staff or
authorized agents.
6. Termfna Cos 7h1s agreement MAY cs terminated by CITY urn
the giving of a written - 113dce of Termination- to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the
event this Agreement is so terminated. CONSULTANT shalt be compensated at
CONSULTANTS applicable hourly rates as sat forth In Exhibit -61, on a pro•
rata basis with respect W the percentage of the project completed as of the
date of termination. in no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than
the maximum specified It paragraph ] (a), above. CONSULTANT shall Provide to
CITY any and ail documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models,
photographs and reports, whether to draft or final fore, prepared by
-5-
CCUSULTART as of date of termination. CCnSUL'tAIIT may rot Grminate this
Agreement except for cause.
T, notices and Cesinnated Rloresnntatives: Any and all
notices, demands, inroices Sol written communications between the parties
hereto Shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph T. Ths below named
individuals, fartlwMeO, shall be tbose persons prtmartly responcible for the
Performance by the parties under this Agreement:
John K. Feeastra, Princi oai Ennlnee_ry, n_eta, Erudin b Stone. "onto Proscher.
Public works Engleeer. City of Rancho Cucamonga
Any such notices, demands, lnvalcas and written wnm+niestlons, by suit, shall
be deemd to have been rocelred by the addressee fforty -eight (18) hours after
deposit thereof In the United States 01111, postage prepald and properly
addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance; CMSULTAIIT shall neither coenente work under
this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a
company or companies acceptable G CITY nor shall CCtSULTART allow any
subcontractor to comms:nce work on a subcontract until all lnsvrance required
Of the subcontractor has been obtained. C08SULTAIIT shall take out and
maintain At ail times during the term of this Agreement tho following policies
of insurance:
(a) worker's Cceeeasaton Insurs^rce: Before beginning
work. CCnSULTART shall furnish to CITY a certificita of Insurance as proof
that it Sus taken out full workers' coopgnsaton insurance for all parsons whom
it slay employ directly or through subcontractors to carrying out the work
specified heroin, in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
.6.
In accordance with the provisions of Callforala Lejor Code
Section 7100, every employer shalt secure the payment of compensation to his
employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certification as follows:
at in aware of the provisions of Sdction 7700 of the LaLor Code
which require every employer to be insured against liability for worters,
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing tho
performance of the work of this Agreement'.
(b) Public Liability and property Damage: Throughout the
term of this Agreement, at COOSULTAnT's sole cost and expense, CWSULTAIT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual
bennfit of CITY and CORSULTANTO comprehensive, broad fora, genrral public
liability and automobile insurance against claims end liabilities for persona'
Injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's :ctivfties,
providing protection of at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (5500400.00)
for bodily injury or death to any one parson or for any one accident or
occurrence and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for
property damage.
(c) Errors and Omissions; CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies
of Insurance concerning errors and missions (•malpractice•) providing
protection of at least _One Nllllan Dollars (Si 000 000 0a) for errors and
missions (- melprsctice -) with respect to loss arising from actions of
CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CM.
(d) funeral insurance Re ufrements: All insurance
required by empress provision of this Agreement sbe11 be carried only in
`: ? -7- V
responsible insurance coopanies licensed to do business in the State of
California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as
additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents. All policies shall contain language, to the Went obtainable, to the
effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogatlnn against CITY and
CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, (2) the policies
arm primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be Carried by
CM, and (y) they cannot be C.ncelled or materially c1,%n91d except after
thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified @all. CONSULTANT
shall furnish CITY with copies of all Such policies promptly upon receipt of
then, or certificate evidencing the Insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its
own account insurance not required under thii Agreement. I-rg
i
9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall 4e4*al, Indemnify and
•ave harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, 07fictrs, agents and
employees, from all liability from loss, duvge or injury to persons or
properly, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs a :d
attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentioral or
willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT to the performance of this
Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the
maxivw extent permitted by law.
10. Assignment) No assigncent of this Agreement or of any
part or obligation of performance hereunder shall he made, either in whole or
in part, b/ CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
11. Indepondent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that
COASI'LTANT and its employers, officers and agents are indeptnc t contractors
under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be
w
employees of CITY.
12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed In accordance with the laws of the State of California.
17. Attarnev's Fees: In the event any 10941 proceeding is
instituted to enforce any tern or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing
Party in said legal proceeding 0411 ba untitled to recover attorneys- fees
and costs from the opposing party in in amount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
14. Entire Agreement; This Agreement supersedes any and All
other agreements, elthtr oral or In writing, between the parties with respect
to the subject matter hareln. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges tlu:t
no -eprasentaticn by any party which Is not embodied heroin nor any other
agreeaent, statmnt, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall Ire
valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only
If It Is to writing signed by all parties.
13 WITNESS ld,EREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above:
CONSULTANT
CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Jon 0. Miyeffs-7u7�0F
ATTEST:
ever y u4 a et, ty er
Date: —;L1
Date:
Approved as to form:
ty Carney
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF =9
Construction managmat
Pre- Construction Conference
Pay Estimates
Contract Change Ordvs
Labor Coepllance Enfomemnt
Final Report
As -built Drawings
Inspection
Full 'Tire Inspection and Ooctmution of Yro%
Enforcement of Traffic Control Requirownts
Before and After Photographs
w : at . �.TG�k• • y.
yt
c
EXHINT 6
Schedule of work will follow the murse of project construction.
ECIIBIT C
COIDEIISATiGN
Compensation Is proposed on an hourly basis per attached
Estiauted costs, assusdn99
rate schedule.
both projects, is as follows: a six (6) weak concurrent construction
Period for
Construction Management
Construction Manager 40 h;rs. 0 $65.00
OFFtre Engineer
$2.600
12 Mrs. 0 51.50
Administratin Secretary 16 Mrs. 1 34.00
610
544
Drafter 16 Mrs. P 47.00
Mileage
688
Soo
Total Construction Hnugesent
14.450
Inspection
Senior Inspector (70 days) 240 Ilrs. 0 $50.00
$12.00
Wesge
.800
TOtoal Esttauted 1'ee
$17.750
CONS.W31001 SURVEY FR0P05RL
CITY (IF RANCHO CUCAmwGA
M0;11HTOIM -PHASE IV
CONSTRUCTION STAKIRG (2 -Man Survey Crew)
TASK S!4EET (I SET ESTIMATED RATE PER
MOU0.5 HOUR
ESTIMATED
Eighth Curb Stk.(25 4) 5 $125.00
COST
$625.00
Catch Basin Stk. 2 112 125. GO
CMP
712.50
1 112 125.00
187.50
8e10ont Curb Stk.(25 -) 8 125.00
Catch Basin stk. 2
1.000.00
125.00
Retaining Curb Stk. 2 125.00
250.00
250.00
hacta Curb Stk.(25 -) 8 125.00
Heoder 8 A.C.
1.000,00
Sera Stk. 2 125.00
250.00
Centerline Control 6 Reset 8 125.00
19000.00
Survey Supervision 6 58.00
748.00
Survey Research 4 50.00
200.00
TOTAL aTTMATED COST FOR INTN T01I1 -FPASE IT
PROJECT:
$5,427.10
.z
Exhibit C (cont.)
C0115IRU:' (A SURTET MUM
CUT CF RANCHO CUCXWGA
TURNER AVENUE
CONSTRUCTION STAXMG (2 -Nan Survey Crew)
TASK ESTIMATED
RATE PER
ESTINATKO
STRfET (I SETT HOURS
HOUR
-- COST
Turner Curb Stk.
8
$125.00
$1,000.00
E.P. Stk.
4
125.00
500.00
Rot. Wall stk.
3
125.00
315.00
Catch Basin
2
125.00
250.00
21' RCP
2
125.00
250.00
Feron Curb Stk.(8'CF)
2
125.00
2SO.00
Retaining Curb Stk.
2
125.00
250.00
Main Curb Stk.
4
125.00
500.00
Sewer Stk.(25')
(Mainline 6 Laterals)
6
125.00
150.00
Centerline Survey Control
2
125.00
250.00
Centerline Control 6 kesat
8
125.00
1,000.00
Survey Supervision
6
58.00
348.00
Survey Research
4
50.0
200.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR TURIM
AVEMOE MW:
$5,923.00
Rig �> *n:�` .•r!+ ,y
;j
' RErissn r,�v,- ✓n.•r �
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TD: City Council and City Manager
MON: Lloyd B. Hubbs, C:ty Engineer
BT: Michael 0. Long, Senior Public Yorks iispector
SUBJECT: Aroroval of Professional Service 1greement with Richard Milts
Associates for the preparation of soils Compaction and materials
testing for the Turner Avenue ia,- ovement Project and the North
Tam Phase IV Improvement Project
In conjunction with the subject projects, A consultant is required to test
soils and materials for contract compliance. Richard Hills Associates cf
Rancho Cucamonga has submitted a proposal of $3,950.00 for testing of the
Combined projects. Attached for your consideration aro the proposals for
subject consultant servlrvs.
RECCMENDATIUR
It is recommended that City Council accept the proposals for Richard M!lls
.associates for testing on the subject Pojtcts and authorize the Finance
Director to expend $4,34S.00 (ccab!ned proposal plus 109 contingencies) for
xafd testing, to be funded from HUD and Gas Tax Funds.
Respectfullasubmlt�
,
LBH: .sr
' Attachments
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREMT
This Agreement is made and entered Into this day
of 14___, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a 9uniciDal
Corporetion (hereinafter referred to as - CITY -) an;. Richard Mills Associates
( heroinafter referred to as •CONSOLTANTe).
A. Recitals.
(i) CITY has heretofore Issued its Request for Proposal
pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to thL
preparation of +0119 Gn.o-etlnn rend nwlrri alt te,tlnn rnr th- Turns Aye. I"
Omieer reed the #rnlrrr.
(•mrolecte hereafter). s
(Ii) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services.
(iH) CITY desires to retain CONSOLTANT to parforit professional
services necesss -y to render advice and assistwice to CITY, CITY's Planning
Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to per-rem such
services and is willing to perform such professional services at hereinafter
deftnr;.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSuLTANT As
follows:
6. Agreement.
1. Oefinitivs: The following definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except where the context of this Agreement othtrwise
requires:
t' 3/S1" -1-
(a) Pro ect: C"action testing of off -site utility trench
backfill and off -site Imorovements, e.rd materials testing of aschaltie
pveaxtnt
described In Exhibit •A• Scope of Services hereto Including, but not limited
to. tht preparation of inapt, surveys, recarts, and documents, the
presents• ion, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports
and documents to CITY as remiired 1,14 attendance, at any and all work ,assigns,
Public hearings and other ar;:ings conducted by CITY with respect to the
project as outlined in tiro Scope of Services.
(br tr% sces: Such profti:ionot ervices as are necessary to
be, performed by COxh'!L-,ANT in order to comptetr the, project.
(e) CO mletian of protect: Mt date of coroletion am all
Phases of the Project, Including any and all procedures, deveiopmant plans.
RAPS, surveys, Stan dacuents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations
snd attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project
acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit moo project Schedule
attached hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and ctrtplete the
Project in accordance with Exhibit aA and applicable with Federal, State and
CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys,
reports, plans and documents (hereinafter ooliectivaly referred to as
'documents') including all sapplesental technical dooesents, as described in
Exhibit •Am to CITY within the tine specified in Project Schedules, Exhibit
-2.
,.e
Yi
s8s. Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by
Exhibit *As. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CO.YSMTANr comments
regarding said docraents and COr.SULTANr shall thereafter make such revisions
to said dacucants as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised
documents in such fors and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY.
Tho time limits set forth pursuant to this Ssction 82.(b) may bn extended Croon
A written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CMt'LTA.'(T's $ole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of
CONSULTANT', be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agremaen,. In the
event any such other persons are retained by CONS UST, CONSULTANT hereby
warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perforn services
required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by CUSULTANr except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
3. CiTY agrees as follows.
(a) To Day CMWXTANr a maximum sum of Sau oo
for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover
the cost of ail staff tit: and all other direct and indirect costs or fees,
including the work of employees, consultants armd subcontractors to
CONSULTANT. Daynant to MISULTANT. by CITY, shall be mtds in actordarud with
the schedule sat forth In Exhibit W.
(b) payments to CONSULTANT shall bb made by CITY in
accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and
such Invoices shall be Acid within a retsonable tied after said invoices are
resolved by Cl". All charg-a shall be detailed in Exhibit sC• either with
respect to hourly rates or lunp sum amounts for individual tasks. in no
-3-
v
e
event, however, will said invofces exte:d 951. of individual task totals
described in Exhibits W.
(c) CONSLLTANT agrees that, in no event, 0..411 CITY be
regbired to pay to CONSULTANr any ens id excess of 95% of the oxximaxe payable
hereunder prior to recelpt by CITY of 111 final doaaents, together with all
supplemental technical documents, as described herein 4ccepta5te in fors and
content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 day; after
Presentation or final documents aml acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services: FJYmants for additfom,l services
requested, in writing, by CITY, and not tncluaad in the Scope of Services as
set forth in Eahlbit •A• hareaf, shall be paid on a reiebursuent basis in
accordance ai•h the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit *Co. Charges for
additional services shall be invoiced on a Mmthiy basis ark shall be paid by
CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are recefied by CITY.
4. CITY aorees to oravide to CMULTANr:
(A) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit •A•
hereto.
{b) Fhotographicslly reproducible copies of maps and other
lnformatlon, if available, which CONSULTANT consiears nece;Sary in order to
complete the project.
(c) Such information as Is generally available frm , "ITT
files moplicable to tin project.
(d) Assistance, If necessary, in Obtaining lnforaation
from other govermmentai agencies and /or privata parties, However, it shall be
COitSULTANTIS responsibility to nuke all initfat contact rich raspeet to the
gathering of such information.
-4.
_ r!
E
S. Q+nerhiO of 7Onuent_: All documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, saps, models. Photographs and reports prepared by
CO:ISUi,T /dsr ouruant to this Agreement shall be Considered the property of CITY
and, upon payment 'Or services Perforred by CO:tSuLTAYT. SOU documents and
other identified materials shall ba delivvrtd to CITY by CONSULTAyT.
C"SULTA.IT may, however, make and retain such topics Of said documentS and
materials as COASULTAIIT may desire.
Any use or rouse of the plans and sveclfieattrms except at
the sit* Intended or any alteration or rovision of the plans Or specifications
by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written
consent of the COXMTANT shall be at the sot* risk of the CiTY. The CITY
agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages,
claims and losses including defense costs wising out of any such alteration
or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the c:TY . its staff or
authorized agents.
6. Teeminatton: This agreentit may be terminated by CITT upon
the giving of a written 1Notice of Terninatipn- to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of tsndnation specified in said Notice. In the
event this Agreement is $o terminated, COSSULTAYT shall be compensated at
CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as se: forth in Exh;blt 180, an a pro-
rate basis with respect to the percentage of the project toaPleted as of the
date of termination. In no event, however, shall CMULTA•(r receive more than
the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTMT shall Provide to
CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surva;n, drawings, maps, modals,
Photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, Prepared by "
-5-
1
CQ7SULT,L'iT as of date of torminaticn. CONSULTANT may not terminate this
Agreement except for cause.
7. Notices and Desicnated Representatives: Any and all
notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties
hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named
individuals, furth:=re, shall 50 those persons primarily responsible for the
rerformance by the parties under this Agreement: E. Duane Lyon, p,E„
Grea Chandra, P.Z.
Any such notices, demands, invoices and w itten communications, by mall, shall
be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty.efght (48) hours after
deposit thereof to the United States matt, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as set forth above,
8. Insurance: COMILTANT shall neither commence work under
this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder to a
company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any
subcontractor to CO"Wee work on a subcontract until all insurance required
Of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out mid
maintain At all times during the term of this Agreement the follow,"; policies
of insurance:
(a) Yorker's Comoensaton insurance: Before laginning
work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a cnrtifiate of insurance as proof
that It has taken out full workers, coapa:saton insurance for all persons whom
it may employ directly or through subcontractors to arrying out the work
specified h:raln, in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
a
(A ,
-6-
I
In accordance with the provisions of eailfornia Labor Cote
Section 3100, every employer shalt secure the payment of ceVensatlon to his
employees. C011SULTAnT prior to eaaencing wart, shall sign and fife with CIl'T
a certification as follows:
'I am awue of the provisions of Section 3105 of the Labor Code
which reouire every employer to be Inured against liability for workers'
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
of that Code, and I will cMly with such provisions before co=ncing the
perfoisunce of the work of this Agreement".
(b) Public Liability and property Damage: Throupout the
term of this Agreement, at C07SULTAMT's sole cost and expense. CD.YSL1TAftT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force tnd affect, for the mutual
benefit of CITY and COIISULTMT, coeprehensive, broad farm, general oublie
liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or property damage arising from C0ISULTANT's activit!es,
providing protection of at toast Gne Million Dollars (SI,0D0,000.00) for
bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence
and at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.00) for property damago.
(c) Errors and Omissions: CO. _a11LTAMT shell take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this Agreectnt, a policy or policies
of insurance concerning orrori and omissions ('malpractice') providing
Protection of at least S 1.0 .000.00 for errors
and omissions ('malpractice•) e:tb, respect to joss arising from actions of
C43SULTAUT performing enginearlrg services hereunder on behalf of CITY.
(d) General insurance Reeuiressnts' All insurante
required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in
.7.
S
resoansible Insurance Companies licensed to do business In the Stste of
Additional and polfcles required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall naarr as
Additional
Insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, eMloye
agents. All policies shall contain ranguage, to the extent d
effect Obtainable, to th
as, and that (i) the insurer wafres obt
the right of subragatfon against CITY and
CITY's elected officials, officers, rwiloyees, and agents; (¢) the Aoticias
are primary and noncontributing wtth any tnsurance
CITY: and (J) that Cray be Carried 1)y
they cannot be cancelled or materially
thirty (]O) days notice by the Changed except a fter insurer to CITY by certified mall. COXSULTAIIT
Mall furnish CITY with copies of all such pclfcfos Promptly Thy. or eertlffcr:a evidencing the roan receipt of
Insurance. CONSULTANT aay affect fcr its
orn account Insurance not required under this Agreement.
g. Indemfffcatfan•
save harmless CITY COUSMTANT shall defend. Indexlify one
its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
PrPropertyoperty. , from all liability from loss, dawa9e or injury to persons or
from
the Poya"t by CONSULTA.YT Of any and all legal costs and
attorneys' fees, in any manner arising uut of any negligent or fntcngonai or
willful acts Cr missions of the CONSULTANT in
Agreement, the perferoPerformance oT thi including, but not IfAfted to, alt consequential d s
a
Oaxlmmmm extent pa. "ted ty law. mages . to the
10. Assimroeot c No assignment of this Agreec+ent or of an
Part or abltgatlan of Pcrformancs hereunder shall be made
Y
in part, oy CONSULTANT without tly . either in whole or
Prior written consent of CITY.
11, Indaoendent Contractor-
CWNSULTAItT and its -��'• Th e Parties hereto
employers, officers and Agree that
under Agents are lndapendent Contractors
this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpa.a to be
_8.,
.s
employees of CITY.
12. Govornino law: This Agreement shall to governed ay and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
U. Attgrner's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding Is
Instituted to enforce any tam or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing
party in said legal proceeding shall he entitled to recover attormUs' ryes
and costs from the opposing party in an mount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
14. Entire Agreements This Agreement supersedes any and all
Other agreements, either oral cr in writing, between the parties with respect
to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledgss that
no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor try other
agreement, statement, or proalsv net contained to this Agree&- t shalt be
valid and binding. Any modtfication of this Agreement shall bi, erfettive only
If it is to writing signed by all parties.
IM VITMESS NMEREOf, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above:
;J--- T
CITY' of RANCHO CVCANO1Q
n e s, oavr
ATTEST:
very • utne et, ty Uar
.9.
Date: . .- I. pt
Date:
Approved as to form:
tY ttorney
r
MINT A
SCOPE OF MK
t (1) Comprction testing of offsite utt "'y trench backfill and Witte
street tapnvemants. Services will consist of performing in place density
tests ("W'Actfon tests), water Corte" tests, and maximum density - optierom
aetsture tests at locations and a frequency selected by a representatfw of
eontracicrflsanotoIncludedgin Obser"t1cm Of pefof Imrcw�ork. Anwrittedsre�'tby the
cam�platfongOfhthe results oThelrcportswillf ootbeVa certificatte. or warranty, of
the compaction of pie materials tasted.
(2) Materfmis testing of asphaltic pavement. Servfcaa will include Rvsam
st'abilometer, sieve anulysfs and extraction tests of asphaltic pavement.
Tasts will be performed oa materials
h ent sarpted at ra locations ndo totlons and at
y equfes basedon the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga's requirements.
M.
a
1. •�AY
K
^S
V
EXHIBIT B
Schedule of Work
Schedule of work will
follow the coune project construction.
�a
'r
• yr
+'n:y
a
tt
WHIT C
Compensnttoo for Northtown "hose
1V
1. CONPACTIOR TESTING
A. SAMPLING
1. SOILS TECHNICIAN
2.
16 MR
41.00
656.00
STAFF ENGINEER FIELS
7. PRE JOB ;4EETING
2 NR
60.110
120.00
4 NR
70.110
280.00
SUBTOTAL
SIOS6.00
8- LABORATORY TESTING
I. N11(1NUN OENISTY
;! EA
60.00
120.00
SUBTOTAL
$120.00
�. ENGINEERING REVIEW ANO REPORT
PNXPARATION
1. PRINCtPAL ENGINEER
I 141
70.00
70.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE
I MR
60.90
60.00
7. SECRETARIAL
I HR
24.00
24.00
SUBTOTAL
$154.00
TOTAL
$1]]0.00
II. LABORATORY TESTS - ASPHALT
A. SAMPLING
I, TECHICIAN
2 MR
41.00
82.00
SUBTOTAL
$82.00
B. LABORATORY TESTING
1. ASPHALT STAB ILORET J1YEITI
2 EA
125.00
250.00
2. EATRACTtON- PERCEMT
ASPHALT A GRADATION
7. STAFF ENGINEER LAB;wAT(Ql;
2 EA
1 HR
100.00
200.00
60.00
60.00
SUBTOTAL
5510.00
C. EIIGINEERING REVIEW ANO REPEAT
PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
1 iNt
70.00
70.00
"
2. STAFF ENGINEER rkilCE
1 NR
60.00
60.00
-.
]. SECRETARIAL.
1 MR
24.00
24.00
p:
,Y
�A 1
SUBTOTAL
$154.00''
TOfAL
$746.00
GRARR TOTAL
$207i:00
.1
R Gr
Yyy
..Ir:'z
•. R'11
ff.�,...
EXHIBIT C
Compensation for Turner Avenue
Improvexnt
Pro1eCt
I. CO.YPACTION TESTING
'r
A. SAMING
1
4
1. SOILS TECHNICIAN 12
HR
HR
41.00
60.00
492.00
60.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER FIELS 1
4
HR
70.00
280.00
3. PRE JOB MEETING
SUBTOTAL
$02.00
S. LABORATORY TESTING
1. P6IXINUN DENISTY 2
EA
60.00
120.00
SUBTOTAL
$120.00
C. ENGINEERING REVIEW AHD REPORT PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1
HR
70.00
60.00
70.00
60.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE 1
HR
HR
24.00
24.00
3. SECRETARIAL 1
SUOTOTAL
$154.00
TOTAL
$1106.00
it. LABORATORY TESTS - ASrtALT
A. SAMPLING
I. TECHICIAN 2
HR
41.00
82.00
SUBTOTAL
$82.00
B. LABORATORY TESTING
1. ASPHALT STABILONETRIPdEFY: 2
EA
125.00
250.00
2. EXTRACTIOn- PEP.CENT
ASPHALT 6 GRADATIOU 2
EA
100.00
200.00
3. STAFF ENGINEER LABORATORY 1
HR
60.00
60.00
SUBTOTAL
$510.00
C. ENGINEERING REVIEW AI10 REPORT PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1
HR
HR
70.00
60.00
70.00
60.00
2. STAFF ENGiGfER OFFICE I
1
HR
24.00
24.00
3. SECRETARIAL
SUBTOTAL
$154.00
a
TOTAL
$746K.00
5
GRAND TOTAL
fI2.00;
xs r
February 13, 1916
CITY OF IANCDO CUCANWCA
CUR COUNCIL NINOIVA
I
--
S
A apsclet seet.1% of the City Council of the City of teach@ Cuearags art as
Thursday, February 17, 1996- is the City 14oader's Coefaleace tome, 9320 tale
Liu as", $into C, Rambo Atalsegas. The seating was called to eclat at $too
a.a. by Narsr Jun D. Nigel@.
Protest wr@ cewailsvekores Charles J. Rugvot 1I, Jeffrey Plug, and Mayor J•0
D. NUalo.
Also present wares City Manor, Laurie N. Wotgscaaai Asaiatast City Maggot.
Robert glass.
Abs"tt Cauatilnabers Pawls J. Wright and Richard N. D41.
2. C2arr ■esrrre
2A. AD'+erras o. a tnecDTres .e.gN►flQ a a0ansen.Tler aaarrtev _u�a
Property located at 12713 9amatt Avacao.
RIBCLUTICN 10. 06.33
A RM,.CLOTION or TRl CM1 COWICIL p T$ CITY p RUCD0
COCARMA, CAL"MIA, APPROVING A SUCI INATION AGR[INllT
INCH NILLIAN AID DNA USERS AND AOTiO ZM; in NATOI YD
CITF CLI= TO-510 IAMB.
HO:Ipt HaTed by Rlag, ascended y 9oquat to approve, legalities No. K -M.
Notion carried 7-2 (fright and Doti *boost).
•e•eoe
y anraumm
NOTtpt Hoved by puquat. ascocdad by Rlag to aA!wre. Astlea carrted 3 -2
(Wright and Dahl ablest). '4e seating ndjnroal at $303 a.a.
Respectfully submitted.
lubtat A. tlaao
Actiog City Clem
Approvedt •
+7
1
CRY OF
LkNaD CL)CA 1OMA
AUNDA
ten
Lives tart CsaesaLty Canter
9161 lase Line tad
Rancho Qlaansga, California
Aartl 2. 141r - 70e .jy
All items @%bitted for the City :assail Aps4e met N is exit eg. De
deadline, for submitting tleee items is 71k% p.m. as W 7960esday trier to Ne
meeting. "Am City Clark's Miss receiver ell seek items.
A. P1eCls of Atlelisare to P1aN.
N. tell Call$ Mads x . lc4uat I , tlei I ,
Dahl i , asi Yri/ht .
C. Approval of Minuet Pahruary 13. 1966
24- -X A
A. Thursday. April 3, 196 - 7100 p.s. - , TONIC
PlauTATIM CONIIlNION - Linen lark Cnrtnity Cnter,
9161 lase Lies Neat.
S. 1Nnesday, AprLL 9: 1916 - 7100 p.m. - PLANNING
CONtIIaION - Liens Park Cornmaity Costar, 9161 lees
tdue Red.
C. Thrrsdsys April 17. 1966 - 7130 p.m. - PAlt 1f9QAP,YIIi
CONNI/ /ION - tics. Park Community Canttr, 9161 late
Liu 1444.
7:35 p.m.
kuproved 4 -0-1
M
City CwccLl Nesting -2- iprA 2. 194
D. Thursday. April 24, 1946 - 7830 p.m. - AMISngT
C@0.ISS10R - LLonn park Conomaity Cuter, 91 &I Sons
Liu load.
S. presentation of the 1936 spring Clods Swoop poster
Contest Winner* aM unwacesest of epcoadag class
eweay taWila rraato on Sat2tday. April 12. ISM.
H-e fsllwiq Camnem► fAa-SI r Ltsne are egsat d is be
rnetime and acne :wrrevcreial. They will be sated w7«' by
&be Cewssil at ,N Was Wishner discussion.
A. Approval of Warrants, Register pole. 4-2 -06 sad payroll
ending 3 -20-16 tar rive total arooat of 01,570,220.64.
R. Alcoholic Severade Aplicat'.00 So. AS 06 -04 for 0s -Sale
Door 4 Wise Rating place Liccnas, Srusowitk
Corporation, Located as Seven, 1056 test north of
Toothill Sou!erord sod 1504 feet awtb of Cbnrab
Street.
C. Receive Clair (CL.S -b &) &&most the City by Al),cace
lsecr=e lot actombllo 49ea90 as Archibald /lerse.
D. Approval of Scut flap. taprovesat Agreenst.
yayraramat Security ear Condensation Agrasnaot (Co
06 -21) for Tract No. 13131 (D.R. 85 -17) located at the
norgesat corner of &true Rote and v /nayarS Avssgs
aabritted by Robertson Rose, it dlvioLon of CstwLl
Corporation.
1CdMMON 10. 46 -77
A SUMMON 07 TNR CITY CCCtCII oy T>Y CITT
V/ RANCID COCAWDICA. CALIFORNIA. A"Woo
CMINNATION ACRIMENT An FINAL NAP OF TRACT
$0. 13121
S. Approval of tsOLesaiceal Services +tressat (CO 36 -22)
wltb Norris- lapke. Ioo for the atroot evaluation stwdp
sad final couttvatia, doeoacots for the rehsbilltstied
for various local City - tgsstst lamas Avenue fron
)4spsklw Set. to Faothill Ilvd.1 Seacoa Avense from
Devon St. IMobire 4t.i lergaody Avwss from baron St.
to SeapabLve St.1 Wlvera Avenue fear owns St. to
WaspabLce St.1 DerOD Street free Arabibald Ave, to
Ramgs Ave. Contract smear Ls 629.350 pigs 101
coetlngsacivt to be landed from Spoken Lesdopsst.
Approved 4 -04
_i
City Conseil Knitted -3- April 2. 1966
F. Approval at Professional Parries@ Agreseeat (CO 86 -23)
with Richard Hill@ AmseclJtes for the preparation of
suite c"Wscliom ad materials testing for the Urger
Apes@ Igrawerat PreJaat 884 the forth Ton These I1
Improvement Project for an ar.,at of $4,143.00 to be
funded from 66D and Gas Tan Faeis.
0. Approval of Profutdoaal Services Agraanest (CO 86 -24)
uitb Seats, Stage a $tote, Ise. foe the perforaasee of
p.otualonel asrvicts with respect to enstreetion
rnsgsm"t, tupeotlos and stahisg for North Ton -
PSase IT and Turner Avenue Ispeovanent Projects for the
asst of $32,000.00 to be Is" from MOOD W Gas Tan
tells.
S. Approval to award Rnaidential Strut Rehabilitation
198" these I Project Contract (CO $6 -23) to I.F.S.
6arvicem Incorporated, the tawe&t, responsible bidder
for ,!e amount of $36,718.20.
I. Approval to award North aids of Foothill Boulevard
(China Allay) Contract (CO 0646) to DeArewd
Construction, lowest• responsible bidder, for ibe
sent of 113,647.90.
J. Approval of an Agra@uct (CO 06 -27) between rbe Cities
Of Rancho Cncaacnga, Dpind red Ontario tot wpsisiog of
a preposed store drels system on Grove Avowu. Restbo
tucamoga'e entribatian to this project will be
$29.418.00.
R. Role&@* of Sods all Notice of Completive
f eel..aJ Dawatanr.! - 'R._-x Yff 1 eV m..•R..
.wa�1 YleJ� _
Taithfwl Twrtertmsce Rod (Rama) 168,000.00
6R$OLMO1 10. S6-78
S
A 823O1=0 OF INS CITY CODICIL 4 Ts CITT
OF IAMCBO COCAMICA, CALITOCItA, ACC nnc
IRS T061,2C IID!RMDMTS FOR TRACT 9472 AND
AOINORI$IIG INS 111,210 OT A SCTICZ of
COOMITIJI T01; In Ion
l.bYYt1.. r11 e! s... t .R aRSl 1 .�
net .
Sasaxacutdca god 1 11700.00
• ,..,��t }FTi6_s�'YrtY•RyC"a.._., .� ;i�.w- J,s. --._ c.sv., -. _.. y
City Council Mostiag -4- April 20 1906 44
n
L. Approval of frofectioul Services Agrnenegt (CO U -2q
with DATE System to prepare fatilit7 aside st"y aed
evaluation of City Corporation Tad. Costracc sball
got exceed $9,718.00 to be funded from Systems
Development.
M. Approval of Trotesnfoasl Services Agreement (CO 06 -29)
with L. D. Zlmg, [or tYa design of taker -Arrow
Storm Dral• in tahar Avanu stwoto foothill ltv& and
Arrow Eauto and in Arrow Santa berse s Dakar. Avaevm mad
Cutamguga Croak Manuel and for street Nideal+g aed
Reconstruction of taker Avonee ►acres Foothill Slvd.
and Rth Strut and Arrw Neste betwew Oskar Arguer lei
the Cvtamapa Creek Channel. Centrnct sweet of
$75,50.00 plan 10% aeet(ogeneiee to sew from System
Development toads.
N. Approval of acceptance of Utica Stove, Drain AD 52 -1
from Fourth Street to Sixth Street as complete mad
authorising the filing of a $@cite of Complotlgu.
Rslenset
Faithful forterrnc• Ned $117,859.00
Ratestion 8 12,515.57
RESOLUTION E0. U -79
A NESOLMON Or Is C171 COOSCIL OF TEE OITf
Or ZMCNO COCAMOEDA, CALIFOdIA, ACCEKIRO
IRE PUBLIC 111"pOIITS FOR UTICA ATROE
SION DRAIN AD 82 -1 AND AUZNOCIZIN TO
FIL17C OW A NOTICE of COMPLETION MR TIM NOR
0. Approval of accepts"* of Alts Lev Storm ftda (AD
94-2) Improvements as complete and aet►odslng the
fillas of a Notice of Ce "letia for the work.
Solouu
Fdthfal performance land 81,92811!0.00
Retatiom $ 98,002.11
RESOLUTION 90. 86 -80
A SUMMON Or IES CiTr CMCIL Or To cITT
Or RASCDO CUCANWA, CALI►OREIA, ACCBfIu
TQ PUBLIC IMRCTIMTE FOR ALTA LORA SIM
DRAIN (AD W2) AND LnNMZUG TQ 9ILIR0 Or
A NOTIM 09 CONPLInes FOR Sit NOR
Y
CLty Council Meeting -3- April 2, 1506
!. Apprewal of Lin A6taearet (CO IF,-30) between Lester A.
Darin and Rebates A. Davies and the City of Rancho
Cvcaw*ga for street lrnrege ieprovanasts at 6231
Archibald known.
RUDLCT7,0/ N0. ad-&I
A aGCLGTION or 1Ti CITY COUNCIL OP In CITY
OF RASCOO =00110A, CALIPONIU, ACCRPTDO A
LIEN ArADUIST MON LOTS& A. YD ROW" A.
DAVID W UTBORIEING TS& MAYOR AND CITY
CLIR TO SICK SAKI
p. Appro7al of Liu Astronaut (CO 66 -31) between Say A.
Joaaa asd Nasty L. Jena add the City of Rancho
Cocarsga for street frontage igrovernte at 9760
Laws Avenue.
R6O1,117I011 00. 66 -112
A 111SOLUTION OF Tag CLTI COONCIL O7 TU CITt
OF RANCDO COCANKA, CALMNIA, ACCLRDO A
LIU AOESI T FROM RAT A. JONaY AND DA1CT L.
JOIN AND AOYBNRIEDO Tu MAYOR AND CITY
CLM TO SIGN OAMS
R. Approval of Lin A6ramut (CO 66 -32) batron Risky P.
Miller and Jasnoa i1. Millet and the City of gazebo
Cncarnga for strut floatage igrovernts at 9700
Lars deems.
REOOLUTION .1. 16-11
A RIOOLUTION 07 IN CtTf COUNCIL OF IN CITY
of MUCRO COCA"", CAZI"=U, ACUPTDO A
LIN ACUSKUT Pam EKES V. MILLU AND
JBAaNA M. MILLS& AND ADTIORLEING TIN NATO%
AND CITY CLS&R To 91" RANI
a. Approval of Parcel NAP !1172 located as the southeast
corner of an Bernardino and and Grove Avesun
subeittd by Robert Urebbaao.
RESOLUTION 10. 66 -86
A REOOLUTION 07 TIM CET1 OOORCIL OF TS& CITY
O1 RASCIO CUUMONOA, CALIRI7U, APROyno
PARCEL MAP amen am
T. Approval of Parcel Map 1763 %ceased north of 6tb
Strut, rut of Old Rochester S%Atdtted by Rochester
Freeway North, United.
City Council Noctimg .g-
RIIOUTICII 10. 06-63
A RUMMON Of Tog CITr COORCIL or Txs CITT
Of IMCM COCANO/W, CALIFORNU, Appsollso
PASCIL NAP IMIR 6763
U. Approval of Improvrm mit Recession ARrenrets and
Improvemsat security for Tract Nat. 9441 and MOD
located on Musa Anne. vast a2 Norman Avenue
ambmitted by Ccismer Development Corp.
RUMMON 10. 66 -56
A ASSOLMOS of Ti CITT CMCIL Or TRS CITT
OF IMCK COCAUMA, CALIFORNIA. A171MIC
INPlOfam1T xITN SION ACRIXIU= AND
INriOTOMT 6NCORITISS FOS rRACI Rol. 9441
"a 11600
T. ApprovAl of U provemmet satssaies Alreaasate mad
Improvastat ttcuricy for Tract tot. 11761 ati 11623
located oa uortb% 'Oat Cann of IM 6t. amd Strauss
Ave.
Onownto 10. 66 -67
A lnownce or Tax CITY C0OSCU. at TRN ClTT
07 SAOCIO COCAMICA. CALIPMIA. AP?UMC
IMMINENT xxmszco /OU61RNT AND
VWROVIWMT SOMRITIRN FOR IRAGS Nos. 11781
AND 11623
W. Approval of Improvoumat Agreement and Iawrovemeat
Security for D. R. 63-32 located Is Tract 12176• Lot 0.
as tbo sortbesst corner of Civic Center Drive and Otica
Avon".
NnOLUT70R 10. 06 -00
A 198CLUX 00 OF Tai CITT COOICII. OF III CUP
Of WCM t9CLNOROA. CALIFORNIA AMOTING
INPIOFxImT ACRISNaT AND INTIM 191T
SWMTT FOR D. 1. 03-32
R. Approval of Final Nap. 1,proveauat Agreeant gas
Improvement Security for parcel map 9301 located an the
east aide of Mann Avenue. @curb of Atrcu saute.
%t
City Council Nestias -7- April 2, 1996
MOUTI0w E0. 86-09
A 1fEWM= or TU Cirt COOECII, or TEE CIT7
Of WCW COCAN0w0A. CA:Ir MU. APPROr170
?AIM W 9301. INPICTENUT AOIODCOT AND
IMPICTOIYT I5=TT
Y. Approval of ravironaatal Assousouat aed Qaaoral plus
Aradrat 86-011 - Rewkieb A c"Nest to eased the
Land Use Nap at the Ceooral plus tree Low Density
Reaideatlal (2-4 Lajas) to Low Medium Density
WsUestial (4-I dwlse) ter 13.35 acres of land located
ee eb.t aoutb oida of 94162 Nwla►arA, ctat of Archibald
as 209-035 -02. OS. 14. (C62tim"S from Narcb 20,
1986 meatus.)
RII09DplON 90. 86-69
A RIROLIT20N Or TIE CITE ConclL or TQ CITE
01 WCIO COCANOWCA, CAL170EYIA, ARIO ERR
CORRAL PLAN ANSIBIORT 86.01A - &0=9 -
RIQORQTIEO AO ANw9MRIT To T6 LANE ORE
nVmT 07 TEE Gas" M" nm LOW bosm
R2IIDQTIAL (2-1 DI /AC) To Low MM Dt$2Tr
ISSIDERT2A6 (4-6 M /AC) POI 19.55 AMU O1
LAND LOCATta 00 nra a00LVAR0 TART OF
AEC3UALD -APE 20!-059-02, 07 A 14
Z. Approval to award contract (CO 86 -03) for pvulim"M
demolition services at Carmea park, in tkn asasat et
$9,300.00 to $boater a Butts, Ina. readiaw provided
tbrovCk the Park Developmeat luad.
A&- rot public berries - April 16, 1986 - rimal Commait7
Developmsat Block Great 6tatemmat of CoammeitT
Objectiveo.
City commit Notti•S
-h
L,...AMMcM-vW=g
A. H- DaD17A8Ci assUM •rot UAU m .- - -•
CmI 9ttT.fwrra Sm Tat vat �r a,,. or SIZE AM imx
f1tMAI - Cons Statics d aaoadnoeta to tb city'a
fireworks Ordiance as directed by the City Coascil 404
propasd by the laaebo CaaaausSe firararke Task forme.
OIDIMC1 10. 78-1 (socaai rosdisS)
AN 090-MAYCa 00 TO CItT CWSCIL of T88 CITT
O► O/J+000 'RC.IN0SCA, CALIFOAIA, AN"Ol]O
SZMO8S 8.12.020, 8.12.079, 8.12.c7.1.c.,
0.12.11* At To A1D� SSMICe1 8.12.200 MD
RMC8O LVCAMWA MUNICIPAL C DE I RZATLWO Tie
"MORn
SYMPSIS CDme baCk
next o- ,etfng
Read and file
COme back Nay 7
Came Wk Ap ;11 16
APProvet 4.0-1
—.9 .rererfn >'r =WaoL N-_reratl
s •*"'� sn err art n.s. —`re "' Item tabltd
c
Otoeotaa arwnde7at world fortker 1eli•e the ota•dardi•
Cor priwata epee• •pea e•d preside • broader
avatlskility of "Ttvait; for a�aa apace. (Coatiovad
from vacesbar la, low aratiss.)
OMINAL.1 ■0. 107D (first re•div)
AA OIDI1AtC1 Op TQ CITI CODBCIL Or Tat CITI.
Or TS1 CITT Of MCSO CJCAMO80A, CALIf0I4IA,
AMIIID.LM S08SSCTI08 1 Of SKMOP 11.32.070 Of
TO RMCRO COCA=WA 031CIPAL CWL 16LaT.0
TO PAK ASD RtOakncM LARD D®ICATIOM
aD70ICEMTS
C!t? Cvaocil Kastlo8 -9-
4rl1 2. 19K
toms 60►KrYm
L
A. Un=
cog all is rataactad by aaamraas prepae27 ansro- to
laltlatu ssl tore a2 41eaeSrat dlstriet for th
e09etractio2 of storm drates IS the area east of seven
Aves" from the taat►ars ?Seigle 4iirsad to 842742
dvrree. Laeds l2clodad is the prepaood District are
arrrwtilr am/avalapM but n ►fast to eSrio
dnalopmut ►rors"Is. u
CNCLrTlan t0. 88 -90
A 2NOLOTIOK Or Tet CITY CO?ICM op TR CITY
OF tAMC80 CVCAMMA. CALI70MU MAZIN
033IMTICBS AND A??OItTMTS TO Inn"
RUPOIBIlILITIb YD ?a]?o2K Dumas Mt
InCLL A8888M867 UOCNMISCS (A880MUT
018T81CY t0. 89 -1)
D180LOT1o0 a0. ee -91
A I"OUTION or Tip CITY CMCIL Or Tax CITY
01 tAOCIO CVCAKONOA. CALT?mIA. 8OONL0 Tea
Oall" DATDti. LOCATION AND axama 0?
cnu= ?OBLIC WOW AND M?tr?811ONTt MD
SKW1W T1R ?Roma DOON&M t Or Tag mu
To 84 AU88aU TM tW t (A8aa88KSoT DISMUCT
t0. 04 -1)
RU=lI08 RD, 06-92
A SUMMON O• Tea CITY Co0NCIL Or Tat CITT
Of DYCAO COCAMOMA. CWTONSU MAKItC
,,"INS AND DrMmun ATloms M7; pamog
ta
2104 OF T 8T1 nj AND XWWATB Co0s
(A8aa8L1Ur D1971ICT t0. 88 -1)
Approved 4 -0-1
Approved 4 -0 -1
Approved 4 -0-1
Y.'Y�
Sol
A.
ra
City Gesell Meetly
-l0-
R/OLOTIOY 30. 06-93
aDnDa Olrr CMCIL oP
Tt CIOP "aD A. CALIPOaaIA
C � ORLANDO
nrAtt IEMTS !r
carat cncn4
ul4MTiANCayr TCC
DLraI1S POOOAaS A PROP09� ttilMaar
'MOtICITAL TO Tag pl"I /IONS or Taa JIM
Olt AIM RT 3 a 01 iYOTWA L, IOCAL
To as Aa /.q/aa ITi D//CJtn W Taa DI/T OCAL
TD PAT Taa C07Ia ING
BONDS id9t4tamp DIST1ICT a0.
mmuRm P=n�mmi
10
tla/ esa Neer ho Tao 'Dahl. SZ - Moyer
Prljkt' r. - Gerrtlraaora agoet Sad
. 19"
Approved 4.0.1
Approved 4.0.1
Staff to cork out
amiable time
9:20 P.D.
r�
1�.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t
STAFF REFORTa
i y
Sk y C
iC
Date, April 1, 1486 IfJ7
Tor C1176COL11101 l and City Manager
from, J\Av. , Administrative services Director
fubjecu C Gneral Llability Coverage
Staff Aar been diligently puraoing .vanes to obtaln general liability Insurance
coverage for the City. One avenue pursued was pooling. It was discovered
pools already In existence were not accepting new members, therefore, our only
option appeared to he joining a new pool. Unfortunately, not many now pools
are being daveleped. staff have however, idevicL.1 d one pool that lookst vla-
ble for the City to join.
Thv California Municipal Insurance Authority (CMIA) Is a State wide pool that
is being fenced by Marsh S McLennan (• reputable tnauranee brokerap Cirnl to
Insure cities for general liability erPosursa through the pooling concept. on
the face Of It, the CHIA pcogru looks wry attractive and would be worth the
City pursuing.
I an recommending that a committee comprleed of Mayor KUq and Councllmtsber
sugwt, due to Chair lnvolvewnt in the liability field on a dally basis, the
City Manager. City Attorney and f, be devalopd to review the Marsh a McLennan
program and make w dsetsion regarding the Clty'e prrticipation.
I would ask 00 Co+uaeil to delegate authority to Mayor King and Counellmeeber
Suquat to make An Initial daolsion with the understanding Council's full rrtl-
Citation will be done at a later date. The reason for the co"St to allow
the authority to make sh Initial deolaion is by April 15. 1988, the Initial
premium rust be paid and by lay 1, 19", the City must deelde If it wants to
participate to the pool. If w pay the premium and do not participate the
Premium would be refundtd to us.
ACOOKRL'DATIgI,
Council autncrlze the eaalttee appointtrnts as outlined and authorize the
Council rep erantstives to make a decision pending Cull Council ratification.
JH /tl
Amrim
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1966 --
M: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Rubbs, City Engineer
BT: Michael D. Long, Sonior Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Service Agrotment with Richard Hiils
Associates for the preparation of soils compaction and materials
testing for the Turner Avenue Improvement Protect and the forth
Town Phase Ig taprovewt Project
In conjunction with the subject Projects, a consultant is required to t.st
soils and materials for contract compliance. Richard Mills Associrtes of
Rancho Cucamonga has submitted a proposal of S3,9SO.00 for testing of the
combined projects. Attached for your consideration as ttr_ proposals for
subject consultant services.
RECOIE"I'lo l
It is recomakti aded that City Council accept the proposals for Richard Mills
4s30ciates for testing on the subject projects and authorize the Finance
Mractor to expend $4,345.00 (combined proposal plus 101E contingencies) for
said testing, to be funded from HM and Gas Tax Funds.
Respectfully submit ,
LBH: .sr
Attachmerts
r
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AMEENENT
This Agreeawntt Is made and entered into this day
of 19_, between the City of Rancho Cucamanwtga, a Municipal
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as *CITY-) and Atelurd Hills Aasoelates
(hereinafter referred to as • _. 'nTjLm1,.
A. Rentals.
(1) MY has heretofore Wm-d it: Request for h -piwat
Airtain!ng to the pr ormnto of profasoionai services with •Osoect to the
preparation Of -ni is r_=Bertgn end .+tarsals te.tine Inv eh 1'Ln•rr ava. if.
Omteet fwd the "c hte 0h412 —IV Iromw-re' Pmt t
(- project° hereafter).
(it) CG'SStRTANT has now subottied its proposal for the
parfort+ance of such services.
(111) CITY ::sires to retain CONSULTANT to perforce professional
services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY. CITYts planning
Cemission, City Council and staff in the preparation of project,
(iV) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perforce such
1
WOOS and is willing to perfors such prnfessional services as hereinafter
defined.
NOW, THEREFORE, It is agreed by and between CITY and CVSULTR.YT as
follows:
B. 14reaoent.
1. Definitions: The following definitions shall Willy to the
following terces, except where the context of this Agreeceent otherwise
requires:
-I-
4 .
(a) Project: CcWattion testing of off -site v'411ty trench
backfill and off -site improvements, and materials testing of asohaltic
pavement
described in Exhibit W Scope of Services hereto includine, but not limitad
to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and dou maents, the
presentation, both oral and to writing, of such plans, apps, surveys, reports
d and documents to CITY as required and attendance at my and all work stsstoes,
public hearings and other eemtings canducYld by CITY with resFtct to the
project as outlined In the Scope of Services.
(b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to
be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project.
(c) Completion of Project: The data •f completion of all
phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans,
j naps, purveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations
and attendance by CONS'JITANr At public hearings regarding the project
acceptance for construction is set ftrtl in Exhibit *li• Projett Schedule
attached hereto.
2. COttStXTAUr ""is as follows:
(a) CONMTANT shall forthwith undertake and complain tho
project to accordance with Exhibit rA and applicable with Federal, State and
CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, alt to tip reasonable
s:ttsfaction of CITY.
(b) MISULTAMT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys,
reports, plans and docuasnts (hereinafter collectively referred to as
•documents') including all supplemental technical documents, as described in
Exhibit •A' to CITY within the time specified in Project Stlwduled, Exhibit
-2-
aba. Copies of the dC`cMnI' shall he in such ma)ers as are required by
Exhibit •A•. CITY may thereafter review and forwte-I to CONSULTANT coaeants
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter cute such revisions
to said documents as are dewed necessary. CiTY shall receive revised
documents in such form and in the quantities detamineo necessary by CITT.
The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon
A written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT .nail, at COMSULTANT,s sole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion , t
CONS IANT, be ne -essary to comply with the tams of this Agreement. in ho
event any such other persons aro retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT here?_
warrants that :urn persons shall be fully qualified to perform services
required hereunder. COMSULTAMT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by CONSULTANT except upon the Prior written approval of CITY.
D. CM agrees as follows:
(a) To Pay CURILTANT a mastm m sue of _S67A5��_
for the pertarmznce of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover
the Cost of nil staff time and all other direct and indirect Costs or fees,
tncleomg the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to
CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be mada to aCcordAa with
the schedule set forth it Exhibit W.
(b) Psycmncs to COM IANT shall be made by CITY in
accordance with the Invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and
such invoices shall to Paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are
received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit ICa either with
r' respect to hourly rates or lump sue amounts for individual tasks. In no
.3..
i
r
r
.d�
I
went•, however. will said In ONIS exceed 95= of Individual task totals
described in Exhibits -A•.
(c) COYSULTA.YT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be
required to pay to C09SJtTA,1T any sue in excess of 95% of the maziaum payable
hereunder prlor to receipt by CITT of All final doc=ents, tegother with all
supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable to form and
content to CITY. Final payment shall be =40 not later than 60 days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services: payments for additional services
requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as
set forth in Exhibit -A• hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in
accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit Co. Charges far
additional services shall be invoiced an a monthly basis and shall be paid by
CITY within a reasonable time after said inv0ltea art received by CITY.
4. CM agrees to orovlde to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assirtvrae as set forth in Exhibit -A-
beretc.
(b) Photographieslly reproducible copies of maps and other
tnfcrmaticn. It available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to
caeplete the project.
(e) Such information as Is generally available from CITY
fills applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information
from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, It shall be
CONSULTAHT's responsibility to make ail initial contact with rspeet to the
gathering of such information.
-4-
:y
,Y
s
A
w
itiy�
S. Ownersnio of Oocu tc: all documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, naps, model!, photographs and reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agree!wrt shall be considered the property of CITY
and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such docuamts and
other identified s1teriats shall be delivered to CITY by CONSLt.TANT.
CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such eaeics of said documents and
aaterialz as CONSULTANT may desire.
Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at
the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications
by the CITT, its staff or authorized agents without the specific writtan
consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY
cgrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages,
clatas and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration
or revision, or use or reuse At a-Other site by the CITY , its Stott or
authorized agents.
6. Termination; This agreuaent may be terminated by CITY upon
the giving of a written "Notice of Termination• to CONSULTANT at lc tt fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination - Rcified in said ,Notice. In the
event this Agreement Is SO tersiratad, CONSULTANT shalt be compensated at
CONSULTA+ir's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit ^6e, on a pro-
rate basis witn ra:"ct to the percentage of the project completed as of the
date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than
the maximum specified in pa Agraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall grovids to
CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, moos, models,
photographs AM reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by
• a-
-5.
COnSULTW as Vf date of termination. CMSULT44T may not teminate this
Agrevsent except for cause.
7. Rotiees and Desl natM ReOresentattves: Any and all
notices, dmsrtds, invoices and written ci municatfons between the parties
lerato shall be addressed as set forth to this paragraph 7. The below nomad
individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsiule for the
:-*erformance by the parties under this Agnwxment: E. Duane Lyon, P.E.,
Gres Chandra.`P.E_ —
Any such notices, duandSo 1mrolc®f and written conaunfcatfons b e w
be deemed to have been received b ' Y af•• shad
y the rddressee forty -eight (48) hours after
deposit thertbt to the United States mail. Postage prepaid and properly
addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance: C011SULTANt shall neither ceaaance work under
this Agremvnt until It has obtained all lnsurmce requfred hereunder in a
toeptny or a npan'ss acceptable to rITy nor shall CUSULTAUT &1104 any
subcontractor to eowaenco work on a subcontract until all Insurance required
of this subcontractor has bem obtained. CDhSULTANT shall take out and
of Insurance: nc all times during the term of this Agreement the following pol!cfes
of tnsur•mce:
(a) Worker's Coemensaton tnsurmees
work, CO;I3ULTAUi &hall furnish to CITY a Certificate of insurance bas !proof
that it has taken out full workers' compensator Insurance for all persons whom
it may employ directly or through subcontractors In carrying out me work
Specified herein, in accordance with the laws
)S. of the State of California.
1"L.
.6.
in dtxordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to hil
oxploy +s. MISULTAnT prior to =1enetng work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certifi.ation as follows:
•t am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Coda
which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers -
cocpensation or to undertake self insurance to accordance with the provisions
Of that Coda, and t will Imply with such provisions before eomeeneing Live
perfar4tnce of the Mirk of this Agretmmit•.
(b) public Liability and Prooerty Dazaoe: Throughout the
term of thlo Agreement, at CO.MLTAMT's sole cost and expense. COMTAtT
shat) keep, or eaus0 to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual
benefit of CITY and COMSMTAMT, cOmprehPnsive, broad form, general public
liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or property damage arising from COnSULTAMT13 activities,
Providing protection of at least One Killion Dollars (51,000,000.00) for
bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence
and at least One Killion 00111rs (S1,OOD,000.00) for property damage.
(c) Errors any d po_ lssienst COMSOLTAMT shall take out and
maintain at 411 times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies
of insurance concerning errors and omissions (•malpractice•) providing
Protection of at least S 1.000.000.00 for errors
and omisslor.s (•malpractice•) with respect to loss arising fr0e actions of
COnSULTA4T performing engineering services hereunder on behalf Of CITT.
(d) General Tnsuranee Reeulrements: All insurance s
s. required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in
All r'
r
resoonsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of
California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as
additional Insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents. All policies shall contain. language, to the extent obtainable, to the
effect viat (1) the Insurer Valves the right of subrogation against CiTY and
CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies
are primary and noncontributing with Any Insurance that may be carried by
CITY; m (J) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after
thirty (70) days, notice by the Insurer to CITY by certified mail. CO;ISULTArt
shall furnisn CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of
them, or certificata evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its
Own account insurance not required under this fgreement.
9. Indemnification; CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and
save harmless CITY, Its elected and appointed officials, officers, agerts and
employees, from all liability frox loss, damage or injury to pan ons or
pmparty, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal Costs and
attorneys, fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or
willful acts or missions of the CONSULTANT In the performance of this
Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the
*Axion extent permitted by law.
10. Assignment): No assignment of this Agrexmnt or of any
Part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in W:oie or
in part, by CONSULTANT •ithout the prior written consent of CITY.
I1. independent Contractbe The parties hereto agree that
CONSULTANT and Its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors
under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be
_a.
�f
I
employees of CITY.
12. Governing taw; This Agreement shalt be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
17. Attorney -s Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is
Instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing
party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys, fees
and costs from the opposing party In an amount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
14. Entire Agreement; This Agreement supersedes Any and all
other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the partlas with respect
to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement atknovledges that
no representation by any party whirh it not emtadied herein nor any other
agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be
valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effectiva only
If It Is in writing signed by all parties.
IN MITIESS IN REC9, the parties hareto have executad MIS Agreel ent
as of the day Cnd year first set forth above:
N511LYANJ, _—
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDNGA
n 0. MJkaTs—.-RAyor —'-
ATTEST:
—Wv—erTY—rM tna e . M ty ar
Data:
Date:
Approved as to form,*'
ty t orney
E
I
i.
EXHINT A
SCOPE OF RORk
street l
tImprovements. testing Sery t utility
ices willcensistO trench f
fPerformingintplace density
tests (Compaction tests), wattr contact tests, and amaimum density - optimum
moisture tests at locations and a freapiency Selected by a representative of
tho city of Rancho Cucamonga Observa.tior. of compaction meWds used by the
contractor is not irclWed In the scolm of our work. A written report
summarizing the results of all tuSts lmrformed wilt be pivpared upon
ccaplatton of the work. The report will not be a certificate, or warranty, of
the caapactlon of the materials tested.
(2) Haterials testing of asphaltic pavement. Services will include Hveex
stabilomater, sieve analysts and extrattion tests of aspphaltic pavement.
Tests will be performed on materials sampled at -sndom locations and at
frequencies basOdon the City of Rancho Cucamonga's requirements.
s
I
EI IAT It
Schedule of Vork
Schedule of work will follow the course project constrTctioa.
1, J
r
EXHIBIT C
CW;easatron for Northtown Phase IV
I. CONPA.CTION TESTING
A. SAAMIRG
1. SOILS TECHNICIAN
16
IJL
41.00
656.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER FIELS
2
HR
60.00
120.00
3. PRE JOB HEETING
4
tilt
70.G0
280.00
SUBTOTAL
S10S6.00
S. LABORATORY TESTING
:. HA%INUN OENISTY
2
EA
60.00
120.00
SUBTOTAL
1,120.00
C. ENGINEERING REVIEW AND REPORT
PREPARATION
1. PRINCIPAL ENO'M'R
I
HR
70.09
70.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER )Ft ICE
1
NR
60.00
60.00
0. SECRETARIAL
I
NR
24.00
24.00
SUBTOTAL
1154.06
TOTAL
$1330.00
11. LABORATORY TESTS - ASPHALT
A. SAH.:ING
1. TECNICIAN
2
HR
41.00
82.00
SUBTOTAL
$62.00
B. LABO'.dTQTY TESTING
1. ASPHALT STABILONETRHVr"
2
EA
125.00
250.00
2. Ex"Acr10N- PERCENT
ASPHALT i GRADATICH
2
IA
100.00
200.00
3. STAFF ENGINEER LABORATORY
1
NR
60.00
60.00
SUBTOTAL
SSIO.W
C. ENGINEERING REYIEN ANO REPORT
PREPARATION
I. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
I
HR
70.00
70.00
2. STAFF FNGINEER OFFICE
1
NR
60.00
6U.00
3. SECRETARIAL
I
NR
24.00
_r
24.1{0
aUBTOTAL
Sit
us4:0o i Al
TOTAL
,
;T4f.00
°
am TOTAL
S2W6.00 t,, bja
Jprep
+�k
EXHIBIT C ti
Coopensetion for Turner Avenue Icproveaert Project
[. COItPACTIaY TESTING
ri
A. SAMPLING
1. SOILS TECHNICIAN 12 VA 41.00 452.00
} 2. STAFF EBOINEER FIELS 1 HR 60.00 60.00
3. PRE JOP, MEETING 4 OR 70.00 280.00
SUBTOTAL $22^ 00
B. LABORATORY TEGTINS
f 1. NAXIHUN DENISTY 2 EA 60.00 120.00
{' SUBTOTAH. $120.00
C. ENGINEERING REVIEW AND REPORT PREPARATION
1. PRIACIPAL ENGINEER 1 MR 70.00 70.00
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE 1 OR 60.00 60.00
3. SECRETARIAL 1 HR 24.00 24.00
SUBTOTAL S1S4.00
TOTAL $1105.00
Il. V50RATORT TESTS - ASPHALT
A. SAMPLING
1. TECHICIAN 2 OR 41.00 82.00
SUBTOTAL 582.00
B. LABORATORY TESTING
1. ASPHALT STIBILONZIRKEEN 2 EA 125.00 250.00
2. EXTRACTION- PLRCENT
ASPHALT 5 GRADATI08 2 EA 100.00 200.00
3. STAFF ENGINEER LABORATORY 1 HR 60.00 60.00
SUBTOTAL $510.00
C. ENGINEERING REVIEW AND REPORT PREPARATION
a 1. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1 HR 70.00 70.00.-
2. STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE 1 MR $0.00 FO.00
b 3. SECRETARIAL I HR 24.00 24.00 -
a
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL „ F7}74fi�0_0
am TOTAL a " ;1f132`OO'R y�
RE✓�seo ll+viwrih
— CiTY OF RANCHO CUCASIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1995 "r--
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Michael 0. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Mesta, Brudin 6
Stone, Inc. for the performance of professional services with
respect to construction minageuent, inspection and staking for
North Tam Phase IY and Turner Avenue Improveuent Projects for
the mount of $32,000.00 to be funded from HUD and Gas Tax Funds
In conjunction with the subject projrcts, consulting services are required for
inspection and surveying. Neste, Brudin t Stone has submitted 4 combined
proposal of $29,096.00 for services necessary to cover subject project,.
RECOb!lENDATION
It is recommended that City Council accept the proposal from Neste, Brudin Ii
Stone, execute the ftfessional Services Agreements, and authorize the Finance
Director to expend 532,000.00 (combined proposals of $29,096.00 plus $2,904.00
contingencies) for said services to be funded from hU0 and Gas Tax Funds.
Respectfully sutxattt ,
i
I'. :sr 7
,crr
PROFESSiON.1L SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement 1s Buds and entered into this -- ay
of , l9, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal
Corporation ( hereinafter referred to as •CITY ") and Neste. Orodin
Stone (hereinafter referred to as *CONSULTANT').
A. Recitals.
(i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal
pertaining to the performance of rrofesslonal services with respect W
construction management, inspection and staking for North Town - phase IV
and Turner Avenue Impn.rement Projects (*Project* heraafter).
(i1) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services.
(iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform proressforml
services necessary to randar advice and assistance to CITY, City COudcil and
staff In the crapteteton of Project.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that It is qualified to perform such
services and Is willing to perform such prof4•4fonal services as berelnafter
defined.
t
F NON. THEREFORE, It is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as
follows:
B. Agreement.
1. DeHnitimns: The following definitions shall apply to the
following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise
requires:
Y
)+ ♦ A. .T �y �Oytil
(a) Pro ect: Construction Management, Inspection and Staking
described In Exhibit -A• Scope of elervices hereto Including, but r• +t limited
to, the Preparation of raps, surreys. reports, end documents, the
Presentation, bath oral and fa writing, of such plans. MAPS, surreys, reports
and documents to CITY as require(, and attendance at any and all work sessfons.
Public hearings and other meotings conducted by CITY with respect to the
project as outifnei in the Scope or Services.
(b) Se_vlc,4:: Sue" frefessfonai services as are necessary to
U performed by CONS our In order to complete the Project.
(c) VSlutlon Mf PIM Met: The date or coapletfon of all
phases of the project. Including any and all Procedures, deratopmont plans.
Ws, surveys, Pl m documents, technlexl rcyorts, meetings, oral presentations
and attendance by WISULTANT at Public hearings regarding the project
accePUnce is sat forth In Exhibit •B• Protect Schedule attachel hereto.
T. CONSULTANT aorces as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the
project in ac:ordance with Exhibit •A• ant applicable with federal, State and
CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable
sattsfactfoa of CITY.
(b) CONSULTATT shill supply originals of X11 map$,
surreys, reports, Plans arm documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"documents ") Inctuding all supplemental technical doeuments, as described In
Exhibit •A' to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit
W- Copies of the documents s1u11 be In such njobers as are requ by
Exhibit •A', CITY may thereafter review and furward to CONS'ATAM1 comsentt�
regarding said documents and CW;S:4TAKT shall thereafter rake such revisions
to said documents ;a are deamed necessary. CITY shall receive revised
documents in shth fern and 10 the quantities eaterelned necessary by CiTY.
The time limits cot forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon
a written appaovil of CM.
(c) CONSULTANT scull, at CONSULTAIIT•s sole cost an.9
expense, secure and hire such other persons as my, in the opinion of
CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply ulth the terns of this Agnesent, in the
event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT bereby
warrants that such parsons shall be fully quclffled to perform servicts
required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agraas that no subcontractor shall be
retained by COISULTANT•except upon the prior written Approval of CITY.
1. CITY agrees as follows;
(A) To pap CONSULTANT the sup outline in Exhibit 'A'
for tae perforunce of the service; required hereunder. This sum shaii :over
the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or tees,
including the work of eaployeas, consultants and subcontractors to
CONSULTA4r. PAY=nt to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with
the scheeule set forth in Hxhlbit 'CO.
(b) Paynants to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY to
accordance witN the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a Monthly basis, and
such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said Invoices Are
received by CITY. All charges shall he dctalled to Exhibit 'C' either with
respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no
,
event, haweYer, will sold invoices exceed 95: of Indfridusl task totals
described In Eshlbfts W and *CO.
(c) C08SULTNIT agrees that, in no event, shalt CITY as
required to PAY to CUSULTANT any sun in excess of 9S: of the maximum payable
hereunder prior to receipt by CiTT of all final documents, together with all
supplemental technical documents, as described herein accaptable In fors and
content to CITY. Final payment shall be soda not later than 60 days after
presentation of final documents and acceptancs thereof by CM.
(d) Additional services: Payments for additional services
requested. In writing, by CITY, and not Included :n the Scope of Services as
set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereof, shall be paid on a roimbcrsement basis in
accordance with the fee schedule set forth to Exhibit *CO. Charges for
additional services shall be Insaiced on a monthly basis and shall be Rid by
CiTY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CiTY.
6. CITY aarees_!o provide to CONSOLTArR:
(a) information and assistance as set forth to Exhibit •A•
hereto.
(b) Photagraphlcally reproducible copies of maps and other
Information. If available, which CO•'ISULTNfT considers necessary In order to
complete the project.
(c) Such Information as Is generally available from CITY
files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information
from other goverazental 39MIes end /or private parties. However, It shall be
CORSULTMT's rosponsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the
gathering of such information. )
.S.
r.
S. Ownership of Nmcurents: All documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, wpm, models, photographs and report: prepared by
CODSVLTANT puesuant to this Agreement shalt be considered the property of CITY
and, upon p3ymeh• for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and
other identlfied materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT mays however, ask& and retain such too' t of said docuwnts and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire.
Any use or reuse of the pleas and specifications except at
the site Intended or any alteration or revision of the plans c• specifications
by the CITY. Its staff or authorized agents without the specific written
consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the 5010 rise of the CITY. The CiTr
Woos to hold harmless and Indemnify the CONSULTANT against all drwges,
claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration
or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or
authorized agents.
6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon
the giving of a written 'Notice of Termlration' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination specified In said notice. In the
event this Agreement is so terminated. CONSULTANT shall be compensated at
CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rotas as set Nrth In Exhibit 'O', on a pro.
rate basis with respect to the percentage of the proJect Completed as of Lke
date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT racaive Moro than
the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to
CITY any and all documents, data, studles, surveys, drawings, maps, models,
I
Photographs and reports, whether in draft or final fora 1
, prepared by
-5. k
r•
w,
i
,
COnSULTANT as of data of termination. CORSULTAnT may not terminate this
Agreement except ror Cause.
7. Notices and Oestnnated Representatives: Any and all
notices, demands, invoices and written coamunications between the parties
hereto shall be addressed as set forth In this paragraph 7. The below named
individuals, furthl -more, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the
porformance by the parties under this Agreement:
John K. Feenstra. Prfmipal en Inter, nests Brudin a Stone, ibnte prascher.
Public Works Eneinear, City of Rancho Cucaaonna
Any such notices, eamands, invoices and written communications. by mail, shall
be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after
deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance: COnSULTART shall neither commence work und�ir
this Agreement until It has obtained all insurance required hereunder In a
company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall COnSULTA.:T allow any
subcontractor to comaonce work on a subcontract until all insurance, requiree
of the subcontractor has been obtained. COnSULTART shall take out and
maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies
of insurance:
(a) Worker's Comoentaton Insurance: Before beginning
work, COnSULTART shall furnish to CiTY a certificate If insurance as proof
that It has taken out full workers' compensaton Insurance for all parsons whom
it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying cut the work
specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
-6-
- f
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 3700, every employer shalt secure the payment of compensation to his
employees. CONSULTAMT prior to co=encing work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certification rs follows:
'T in aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code
which require every employer to be insured against Ilk "lfty for workers'
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commancing the
performance of the work of this Agreement.
(b) Public Liability and ProPerty Damage: Throughout the
tern of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT
shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual
benefit of CiTY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad faro, general public
liability and automobile Insurance against claims and liabilities for personal
injury, death, or proprty damage arising from CONSULTUT's activ!ties,
providing protection of at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (SSOD.000.00)
for bodily injury or death to any one parson or for any one accident or
occurrence and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (S1j00,000.00) for
property damage.
(c) Errors and Oalsslons: CONSULTANT Shall take out and
maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies
of Insurance concerning errors and omissions ('malpractice") providing
Protection of At least 0_e Million Dollars 01, 000,000-00) for errors and
omissions ('malpractice') with respect to loss arising from actions of
CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY.
(d) General_ Insurance Reeulreeentss All insurance
rS
required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only to
�+
.7.
iA
0
I
e
responsible Insurance coapantes licensed to do business In the State of
California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall nacre as
additional Insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to tie
fffect that (1) the Insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and
GTY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies
are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by
CITY; and ;3) they cannot be Cancelled or materially changed except after
thirty (30) days' notice by the Insurer to CITY by certified wit. CMSULTABT
shall fur-Ash CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of
then, or certificate evidencing the Insurance. C0.'tSULTANT may effect for its
own account Insurance not required under this Agreement.
9. Indemniflcstion: CONSULTANT shall Iefe". Indeacify and
save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
employees, froo all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or
property, including the payalnt by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and
attorneys' fees, In any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or
willful sets er omissions of the CONSULTANT In the performance of this
Agreamnt, including, but not limited to, all consequential danages, to the
MWONA extant permitted by law.
10. Asslg_nmen1: No assignment of this Agreement or of any
part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or
In part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
11. independent Contractor. The parties hereto agree that
CONSULTANT and Its employers, Officers and agents are independent contractors
under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be
'8-
v
employees of CITY.
12. 0grerning law; This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
17. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal procseding is
Instituted to enforce any M, or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing
Party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees
and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all
' other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect
to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that
no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other
agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be
valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall br effective only
If It Is in writing signed by all parties.
iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above:
C0N5 TANT
v �
CITY OF RAIICWO CUCANOMGA
on a s, yor
ATTEST:
every A. Autnalet, City C tr
Date: /T
Data:
Approved as to font
City ttorney
EMIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
Construction Management
- Pro - Construction Conference
- Pay Estimates
- Contract Change Orders
Labor Compliance Enforcement
Flnal Report
As -Built Drawings
Inspection
Full -Time inspection and Documentation of Wrok
Enforcement of Traffic Control Requirements
Before and After Photographs
5
EMPIT t
schedule of wort will follow the ccune of project construction.
�t ,
■
a`
P
EXHIBIT C
COMPENSATION
Compensation is proposed on an hourly basis per attached rate s:hedule.
Estimated costs, asswtn0 a six (6) week concurrant construction period for
both projects, is as follows:
Construction Management
Construction Managor 40 Mrs. 0 $65.00 $2,600
Office Engineer 12 Mrs. 0 51.50 618
Administrative Secretary 16 Mrs. 0 34.00 544
Drafter 16 Mrs. 0 43.00 all
Mileage S00
Total Construction Management $4.950
inspection
Senior Inspector (30 days) 240 Mrs. B $50.00 $12,000
Mileage 600
Tatoal Estimated Fee $17,750
CORSTROCTIOM SURVEY PROPOSAL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MORTHTOHR -PHASE IV
CONSTRUCTION STAKING (2 -Han Survey Crew)
TASK
ESTIMATED
RATE PER
ESTIMATED
STREET (1 SET)
HOURS
ROUR
COST
Eighth Curb Stk.(2S')
5
$125.00
$625.00
Catch Basin Stk.
2 1/2
125.00
312.50
Clip
1 1/2
125.00
187.50
Delmont Curb Stk.(256)
a
125.00
19000.00
Catch Basin stk.
2
125.JO
250.00
Retaining Curb Stk.
2
125.00
250.00
Acscia Cuwb Stk.(2S')
a
125.00
i,C00.00
Header X A.C.
Bern Stk.
2
125.00
250.00
Centerline Control 6 Reset
8
125.00
5.0^-0.00
Survey Supervision
6
58.00
348.00
Survey Research
4
50.00
200.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR NORTH TOW -PHASE
IV PROJECT.
$5,423.00
S`.
r
Exhibit C (font.)
CONSTRUCTION SOR>)ET PII01'OSAL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA
TURNER AYENUE
CONSTRUCTIMI STAKING (2-Man Survey Crew)
■
■
r
TASK ESTIMATED
RATE PER
ESTIMATMED
STREET
(1 SET)
IKNIRS
HOUR
COST
Turner
Curb Stk.
B
$125.00
$1,000.00
E.P. Stt.
4
125.00
500.00
Rot. Gall Stk.
3
125.00
375.00
Catch Basin
2
125.00
250.00
21' RCP
2
125.00
250.00
Feron
Curb Stk.(8'CF)
2
125.00
250.00
Retaining Curb Stk.
2
125.00
250.00
Main
Curb Stk.
4
125.00
500.00
Sewer Stk.(25')
(Mainline 8 laterals)
6
125.00
750.00
Centerline Survey Control
2
125.00
250.00
Centerline Control 6 Reset
8
125.00
10000.00
Survey
Supervision
6
58.00
348.00
Survey
Research
4
50.0
200.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR TURNER
AYEJR)E PROJECT:
$5,923.00
■
■
r
RaV(SOO coNSE/3T
CITY CP RANCHO CU'CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1966
70: City Council and City Kanager
FROM: Lloyd 6. M!)bs, City Engineer
BT: Osre Blerins, Maintenacte Superintendent
Approval of anfd authorize the Tilt p f LOA Notice ofCospli�o for the
wort
The Alta Lou" sane Drain Engineer. 6I 2isKrrtcnd�le the the Couil psi�ee
satisfaction of the City Engt t and direct the City
the acceptance of the project. aaaueap00t," the final peywa
Engineer
formance surety (fl 926,140C0011and retie tion (S County D02 1sleorder and release
IIEC616EMDATIpe
It is recommended that Council accePt As coyllu the Alta LW Storm =ts!n
(AD 81-2) Project and pass the attacWA resolution authorizing the City
Engineer to file the Mltice of Co"lotion and release ter faithful plrforonct
bond and retention (75 days after filing Motion of Completion) and Authorize
final payaent.
Respectfully subm tted,
as
Atizchment
i - mats
.l
Cal-Tax Research Bulletin
MwCh 1991
The Gann Public Pay Limit:
An Anstysis
Intloducoon
Ora.as r e W W►rrakv te.isa
!lrre Mre.a.aatt re r Mnra.f{
rlMrr W M..RI. cave M.e...b.I
Aw w't h" du h:/q.trr6rc' K�
aefw'an iwr ip�eta d.
Oak arlr./r.,faNra.Mwr rferr
bran M,t.4eeWawae ✓erYA.
tLAC, "add*df or did
rlWeg rahiMye YeYr aera
.f 6K4at..tre W WMgea awt
CYN ft...e. W Y W <tf...+►
a°�fr.ei7 eaa.aw)Vrreewk.afrl
.11be.Mawrt Iwrpy W r. e.Wtlw
weae N Ied W p.wr mb*s Neff
r.N..wW7re wrOtdv nae Na f q e/
...a er.wtlw,aN* W Oman
.aw ea t....rw edbWr Tka.
It COW kme aver rtra r 1j IM
l.tw -0� I Mwft Oar1
.a.Ww n6.aw &-VAN MY at H
nrnrNlFYWW rtMaw.Yra Mr.t
W r,7 ertr.f7..Hr.dt We7ng.r1
7k."daA..b1.br.7Ad%mf m •W
rw:MLyrrt.,r W WWagrrY hb r
.+.tot W,aM7 r'.11nt mestna.ie.
AIRY My C tpnr r+74a n.rs dw,
tY. b awaft4 rr r rrtr7 W tM+
Wl r' •
Dowriptlon
Itaewwka&md WLLnre.F ,,wb7
raw Orgrbgwhw Nwsba,, tM
"6L r 1111* t.m.ryrrw 9. W Wba.
tofawyNwaawoyh d .Nreobr
W
• Tb. antra 111117 ae.L raeua
laa t/f.100 Y KOD[q Iue 7r.
u7ferleWt8(dw rldWws
Soul W..rbM u7ner Wagt W Ar
Soul Gomm r "UPC r.n..
g Y►)r1a7r1YAtr,,oWFj 1...Y
rrs Ire 34TAN Y $GUN F.A+•
f a, rk.ra N ea►.. w w BtM
tw w r
rnan t. tuarf r�7er.
0 nA rich NN WM WE eY6% ek7.
ary.db V rr►.r yedtlwtets
rgiTa t+r+r. errtalet r aglq.l
.aba erYaet, sW Me. iM.Y►
.w of owd.hwY.w"IM n
ff� N W Wwrr'e.r"7. r Mlpf.
tf a.Mv.1�a. wNl M r Ir.r Y
aNa W N turY.lrW eP.tiMaluf N
!<w.w W..vlrar�Ma� sl�i�
.YkM arrr.N y . NNwW eayrq
.eta Ara rw ea.Y Ie r tne.r Y
raalr NId e4aNbitY.bknt.f
rd bJ N eNr. Y dbdw
ftw AV raaerera.r rls.letaaw60
1" edrM ...N taM. Y L f W
w Nad sp*t* ids are rs7 w.Y.rrb v of Mare bra rV n
rweu �.I lsitw M mo t7 a
.aW/Y .b Wive ataa tWa b rw
POW tartly
TheYW/..NYMbera eYWIr
.ka► la 40111 eaUr of re I.'ttnM W
btldw.e.eN/ M rnWltd lur a.a
r f Y.e sra'rrf e.ansl. WI'aseler
NrAr.Y awa.b.a omd tr earl fib
r• tm. W tkim e.aet tw 7eaw L
rrlw eaHm w t,drrer, by e..
r►4 a.4adt4ewww wWh.Ytt
e4W7.e eenles ee.vaeb w ems N
CNArq r kaf r W wtrrYre w e.•
eM Wv Ira
p.te.rndr..t%W be I..k&Uw bar
WYt ..rlw eetrd utLet . ta.N
w.lrrW Nm.Rey W Ya4 atw
Aurm7 G~ws Near no "kid"
WMM .ta. rank earr7eu hr r
aro4trr rr Wave aw atMla tlae't
ark ha ea. aIw I 7r Y W .m.
Ssctlon by
UdIon Am"s
ROPW of 3Ws IfNd
stme aeaW tnruit QitrW tL.tMM
Ytow 4ttir tlGlOri.wk Itir►NrWg
ak".Ir N wAtr et.te eftl.it
lair II a/w titYw 7rY W Gf1a.
W pwnkrra.ktrwY'IWtf +7
ILrMra' n..w body .r.r. eWbe
afwYrf a tr.petetra K WI .ir
■= .al.dlast ►.b WIt a
b .wll Had
"as W rY0 fraawm rr
.Wt7 r.anrer he tar...
New Con edw1o"
Ssiuy 1jMfts
>taAwrow" ttW. rwwWNberm
wv N w rwiast the odor N w
Oe.enrtbti0etkk.Hrr�fev, W W
d.h.N.f erwrw♦rYwirws W
"ba.NWIYYMria .&A*tw
.bdtwMNMIC Ir T.a"blotY
Ww.wt r.r fork r tisra>.ld.
fwtlwiMeur Warera.lr+
r+w a.r v tw+l earW7.4 �
erY.tt
oN t a4 ad t1w 'Oaermg.refre
Wiry. Ihrr' dd w
ear��dw op wiwa s ab
..lw•'ebrrw .
W Wterr�rNrMt N W Owe'.
er'� try, rwrt.t W rwrY 4 rt
aoeN TaekW.h w .e "Me�wW
b • tu.akkr. WNreYa
Y II red runts raw r.r.tfr w
nh7N W Oe.afrl�s . wrJYiaal
Wbr.r -.avert trlebutr.7
W.®a W krf— a>�dbM4
_ .a7 srr rntw
pl rr r �iM N YYM w W wr�,y Y
GAyei7Nlf4111" am WA In f
w 9ufati. Y We yam ed rtr
arrr +r aver krr .wy tartar
140 me bNt Ind 1 aartMYaw jr
le► rHd al fapl PeWtrwre 4140
b e% Md I r• aa'ly w W rt tw rr.rd
dfanai4shrV" A MIM it w
t6✓ WWWAA7 ar1A CiAaar Y r..
ewrskra
CAlookles -Mc MrualIC.O.w
d.t h+ r
pdwdm Y w a"" r U. VWW Y km
674M O(VOW .�+e ktb Vak.11uraUpi.
Y t.a7lnra, !1rm M mlr. tM odm.tm
Mena w p1Yn U„ r
Ur i.A.7l.mmlv7d W m..rwt 7t.d{e!
✓do Ual.nrgdGYr✓.b�t►r
G� ti"W kWdetirYthe
!mtrotFAlmF.ay...p mcWk%.
we 4 rr a .mlki.r ww .Yl a
►r.rld4t.fio.rr o.. tle:..uynry.
bstba
W WU^ rr
wN/ nNbrrrw" WwniN�r
t4 W emY.w lrlFtr.alasism
Omnr.a MW ild Y Ur tl.n lr art
l.r . imnl ✓ rrYdrr b a $NAM
am.ne.mlr. CdU.W d.n ar ne.r
br am ~tMnri ✓MM It 4m ow ke
FqW "noon r
AL, dram WN r W ...0 a..W
lmm.. Wu Wrpr 4 "kwm s mrY.d
IrbelrrmI lme4ard
Nr W I �y.4r The
rd9ad of up mini" Mau .
eAW Z4,W nW .
"much" ,tf rratln diem r m*..
WbdakL "tow tSdnn twa.r....ur
"tow W Wr a
.nr lln We7Y4M..p
A Unit on ".Salary"
or "Compsnaation ?rm
Y w. P,p,Yt remiss. -ftk W,
saw Rk - r tm "On rU.ti� 1
"
fM%Wmda wpm" rm kW"m4o-
a"bW rdP"&*W#gr7
e. dadilwm mn Fr..N.d .41Y W
aerdert.
U"nrr•LUm mn.W m garb r Uund
✓ 9O.aW Wma rrebna a.rtY. JIAt.ea
Ca-Fux Research
Q lw.. Y . ---
m.ee.vrr Grl.4 � b
�mr..t{•.uYYIown 114 .rYty W V
ca
Lb
"7rtrmw ttYwtrY. °�! tm4.1 .rl My M pre
Ytdpi& YreW. r r.YrAr W ft"
dittm Owr.r'aWlrJ.bwalvJ W*"d r row ..a4.WA" muW
DPW 4..edmmYwdYminymlN re..b
4xt_!�aP_- adry'rabri.4 _ _ mrirrmy Rllrtia
Immn.
Wa 0a7 W&* r V"imY1mmm
an of w Ger"Wes Wrr. Ty palm
Udt MmaAa.lim."in mm4d
M w am"" .4 n.PrmeY. tar 4
f.nrametr.ii b OW "—I" ar w
Kr W.tlrt"W dream Ytr
4r - ararrtlr- r -021W w W
mar tlep Ar an d s"Y mov-
b It gWxW pwft ply
aO e b rtln Wovermy
Wm a Preem"t Wm earm
teeVAN CO�eMs?
►.r.r.w+.war.dur`.a
rent- r.ytb -aiA Wes ""limey
.dinesrdrr. ti� rd. err, aw
7elt.mdt l.rr•
murtn ►4- Pa/ mealy"
bbdt4w.a+pd
mem.Larmdarsraq rrrrl.ert,
kw ma
Pa"dn.dl b Yaes
State Contrmt
Service Umits
Udr./d- mF.dml Aernre.'.ey OA Lftmm�
myoyr.ekes H" m NoLrKur tint
rem! Mf d W IlmmerY mdn7} 7L
1W.meetder.Yater&cf, derYd•
b, q pJYy.a. r Y m.A -�. _ _ _
plat Y W r4aladtrrr.arrr7
—fim Nrl.nd y senile arse m r
rr.k.. com W" A mo oed"...
Om Y FAd d W Uw4✓& av7.
ekatl h*mb*m..ey�.�e4rp
an UYM 4 Ya 7..i". %m cut W
8.e a p.q d. V Ylrm r4. dMr ma.
S. W.am.dm M /Aaq r Nr r Yia.'Iari
MY7r ew4f W �rY r "wasp./
000"md Y mcbm &mm d W
YAdd ftnW- wddd s-
WWAY by VW^realm w N.wm d
t� n4✓Wmd- rVYI.S•s"
LmaYia....ami. M m
nA ..dd 4tu1 A.. ""Mm
q.e61 4�rrrt- OW b"m 4 ypW a
F>w,"
I..nrW�Y.*k MriyA.t."
t' °�� 4q.r ..W W Wum*.
"
P " ...YfWTUiw Ytty.
w.aY..mrrwrwYrrwtw
daiMlydwr>.r.rTi...Y W
4 Yaer{rr MprY. r peeft 4 Mr
r.etle.d.rlrtWWrte.rsW nnina
7ntn.All. tti ," M u . arft, &."
"rameld W*. in jmWF to . ant
moor d F.W 4. Y Jr4y 1M.
StstOwme, Votes on
Sdary Increases
s..atr.ldYl p..tJ.m tL.t M w/7 V
crr b ay aatrrYrl die...ri..
dd. etaYFYnd dcN.U.rY., Wes
desnr moot J.rtts,
drvdyl.a %Y,h
e� �dwm. d.rn.r.rr..ta.
Cronin
mom rmud met W Ytrt ✓,w mend.
1 U4..ldm, bMw7mu64eUW
aura drmmr. r k-W an Ydrd Y d
89m w ..mm a W moor.
U.IW. w Q.n .- Wrl Ueh 6
.li O*" bd b N70..AUW
W a. U W o..e..e, Wj y W W 6,
mair7 mramt M ►
my drYb a.Wrttwodloon.t►r
Y,1w g F..11ma r
W t7.tran maar �.t{NW'm'j�d ty
arr.r Go-mea tree at ✓ems
UAwYMaaW tkalmrlam W Rq.ed
Woos. r .w��
B&kto irdd► or I
t4tW4 v em✓e+e.d FIa- . w
W •Msrut dse•tls'stW rs'ttlsr
la`Ia Ned k a•ttls. ekdww snd
ss+YwtbrlM4�Wis
)ANWASts l lskdsnrs
am sees,
� la er.ss Ys
LOCa1 VOtaa on
TM•yttsl"
sale Inc
7Y ncnasoa
rwdrss7IsS@,* srs4b
c+�r.t.a>M 7ss4a0
WWN" "Amy of oa st4nlbt rs.t
l
dW aW std kfar d s 67
04 bb to be
ssa a tame her
0/1 1[
C, POPOIN
sHdsk k tld t""rodYW sk.W
01 Lbesem&,w.
AVtsp�y'� �'I��li
of
of VON o Pecs sww
MGM s.ttNr�s'1s+Y..rs.N U'
w drsns• Orr` 4 4 �•sssM, as]
"Weems" at Ysuga 4 krd.ss w i° �•WY stM7sfror.,k n
Ads
tar rst+rrk. y
�rn
Wwi'srFN+lr
°paw" 4 w s7 sl tlyr �•tstis
The 0 ect of
s'Mbakrstteneseesk.ky, a
sf eef s1 W Gsawsw'� t.y7, excess
C-MOM
It I0 dUlc%kad1m:,,,Wh.,,e rLW
aa.t u � rs0s's- ss��s' s.•,7�.�k� M�
C'IMh'ilsVs,k *a W07 W
s..Ysa �y� wm"b bit
^ek`^" U,,J0lwtrduw.
rs sr seen ratkr k.r t PWk
SUM Seem A. Ash� bw dty tb of
W s_... �arkr.+rttssa
bew"A.WNS,dpp .0 -mbs166 PM4810"pv 1 krYk'W'MYNtn W�ttawsl
J Rollback of SaWlea
IJ K 9aIi smim v.atatw.
.kaww•rrtlttr see— a& -wTau
"k c'bnu ttri b rjrrr ti,
ssrrdtest d'�'IpsV uW6sssr,
bwyd eK � rwy
Pr011iblllon cf Vacation
and Sick Leave
AccumulatW
Poetess smw .— .0 Owned w
bdieswAmoft►I gssttlmm"bJesuit.
k ~a�� �ymto w"r�tbw
a..,.t
piet" tw Or, ley
r qftwjminwxm
Use w �0'at�& be s �ss:sser
MO M wU W w M tsly, paw
Nsr
sWy'bt.sat.. dd°PSl'kt•b' �kstsdf It
Mall o w eY swNsY AN sslatf
netbbabr Ca °.dMb `Md
mks WM
s'st•tlas n1a - - -W Of rkl V.M a
47N7.snly�,, IM741ra tvl.tsay
M sussts{sadevJ C•rttbr
7srrwltrte.e�,de..atb
ts�'s7sr..L rt.sdtb
s4 akk ►y..e.scr.'k. tlssr rn.W'.
r MOM r 01r11sbr 711,94 be 10
r.sesd eaa tb ss0{gy s awis
ON Or.
7 TBlot N�CiI
"�i � o�i�ars olopoo
"w wf I va sno ckk
Mari and raeNkn crWlt.
MW .8 se
00 F"m L6
tr.rt, a k I,k 4
tfik
hr leer 4
0-`• ls.rn l
�r'Y7sn sW I•res law, It u W
�mwsba 4 ride t tb�jq
,ski MIm"m a" she
M YWietr. 's Warw 4""
r u."�'bv Aauuassl Maas
anwbp'sen k: btl.tksreNJ
rta.ra4utr=ft,!
+.dslts�u lyy e A men, km sks V a.
A DroPrmd DoubladldaT
sQW 4� AjJnw vwsrk
Ws "s P.,` I * k M,bbtW
s= vret.s.ts.s4tsi stew
Ws, WrgMma.t me ~,e Y
k &r..w-,m aw�w�W
�r'W'bwn�rrw�al. -v .`.
C.asut skry a wak w skktslL
As swsµ KUs k",. SSW
:
*t tkkt.t "g"
sac Ass es
As pssktses�fsss�tesve, i rk:tw 71s
WrtRdwa7°t Yrsf W lstLCn
M U.pa Mr lys'�� �Kbss9u
mucis Is
she GANN
Addad Contract Llmih
�
?w rr.ean W IMsutw IL
aA'n..tawi'yyW{ seau
tort temwdi{4 ppr ~P�ewY W ��►
genies ekVdaps,bb I
bmA4t Ij W�b'ts lwrat
Awrs•l CwrPS CMaa t"'t7rd U.
Cratsk
M]
WN-4 esa sss • us U pwio
for tss � �ttktsMsetl r bsra
>fstdrsq yaks
ykJl�sw 'M sst 9lrrae.r,,..b
M"*Y. r-O., k
a4 �r`r"rrlr w.. „b»
= W.uo.uw�W'Ir'w� a
r4tW,yf�4W'arrt R�.. M
P„1 w.e f p. y'�t pwYt■ tY.. o■ �
,r.W 4 "�Wf tst y1Mt�tUwggryyy
war to ftxmt*r,"jm
14 a W .ty+
bww 'I Lhe emu sduj� mod 1.
kw, w
Pr• tuY• w10- MR-ft
VIP
D
.a� V of m "Iggg ptw
■w•n Ny■.N q, ItrPWCMM
Asy� rd tl 4t4t �I..A tMrd
O.w•�A1 tY•. �W� y0' wM
WWP`6i°M+t.twwwyamr sw�wr
�btvretrta..,yr - -�
�� ~R�4rN 41MWN tlr!
14 t 1■w,�t`j.� �fit11.y.� .or �Yif /fv4
a'W
�gtw, . sry.y. rwl y^ 4
Mooch As
� tvJrtr.r yr4 y �bw.W W �
fl• wQ ,ggg
+u w
wr■tl WJg;;;; ��
S SO bag,
W 97i as 4A.
00" .fly 1.r obq r tt.•trr
CO[God ly�hRtWnlot to � yw 1 0 T* AVA-10
goat
Wf "we to ° x °ss . 4" x ualae
a levee ° M ” �I'°`°�
h a Umm ow of hs! tomb
ov 75
u�aw
M. use the COSH to f11a5o r c4kIw . S'WI,
tTtl.Ywmaahwm
ONYWASS was flow
OWWVW AP wltteW,! w ►•:
La9fatator,a Eiettramant
t4"1Mli•�.y.r
"s
'AW
�r
AmeWnWft
w f.ya, b.
.4e�•I�Ik� �b�
M ,
n wft j *ll`a'.
y W�rtry ardby��Mgg.yt
/4YM
91. " ,1■
x°441,• saws"Aa,11.•
how
how yyw."N K+■Mfi
IYt■te+l Ow"Aft 4 t.pt4..
w iw „ ^
WftMfl BUPrim ma
prig, WAi
Is”
W�•y3•tY/
oyt�waw ft,* D� ,wi ftww
to MMt+ a
°'y f^�Wart•Y
g*wftmpV
IW4
/rte
•wM rbsY. WW, Wlrr
.Oe
hw� MtutYs ateY "th,
t IMW
.yy
bn Y� �� t`g y sr,uwv
What to tha p-
"Sam, robtamp
wFZ www�Ytlab.
f a�w r4 Yol�iftodmwM.•.bw
1!`t4R w 8fgW
I.
M
I N t �1■11yy
�nnatittittonal
0 4 Fortnula
bOe.Yf.q, .4td4+r b W
fr.R Na.,Wy r1{ a
nm� At
'� �■4w
Y ' `"go" 4'Re ,. ww b W ..iw
44+�ar1 a4
fib°
�aw�wrab:�Q
yu Ww l/w �1A „-,�
CMA 04�w�bfth 90 Ilk
.UI ry kt 4trr Ib.t1y�
w4ehW.4 �la,g.
dthty 4
MA ��,
nnt'�,��MW'Ytisf►.M
Gann'a Fair 4 RIO Wtlrlw
14;d , Pay Amendment WAIV Gr
B 2t87 rw4+rl�p�.l+waln•eYi/ YyAtt r 6094d to lu/yltGOU t.l Y Itq Ud Ltl � r"°r '"`d aan„ r may. M z-=O'
r4V�WSUWMMdawkda/tYquAA�/ yAtwrAW+�"UN, P/?borlpaWy t+0��.mr.vy�°W��
tbWagYr�M 4Wes� a WGr�hValw.oallr Apr `4Y�4�Yi W1aW .wld
wA Yn�rt Y 1/ eay YAttGy Y lrir,
tr TM6@AnrWSW�`YtYUAUUA �����br 91 "Stn's with pwk
1�M7i W Conn coum have r.Y.ty drW�YW,tl au�`f4•`q ► i
aa""d Me rax* he n Ova Lim • W 6Y IA.r..a Y W
Salary *099011ft he t seeking to G.P+ip umWe W d
by unyaw,2
"4*w evr WIN gro ORM OWor � .wtiWOrw�.,1°M -nnoec
perakww rnafODS�/ eNalMe barn ineumhsnt , :lkM. I.u.G... Wahl
eo.ro at earyrn r47/o /1 �--.�. a .t W a1t.:.o AP°"'w' 4s u W
Y2raYi W-SCAM .j..W.� e. "1as r.. W.at
uea. dt
/ruP l%w 6MM6r "M,W rrur
7b1 /trl,ttuyA/ // xwM.uy�W>. %M4M/. Ml,a/p
at r/ uwy h.. r rty
det, Wkr 9wYlA00 %7K6Y . � � Y erytt on 'LM
^°kayyL rjbri ' Nq a p1AN 0.BVZM.yy�y. bAWWtw4hh*
wW r �nb
^uBNyS =7trY.liuy4 H{p�l UK
sue=
' x /* - aosAx msao.y� 9i �Contt(tittFo Y a tt�ww �u�•
2lApG nai w.y.G
/ AMx sr .,., Ofllcer Aerulona
to" t17 ew. 2.ya nY
q/At0 +nr.W. G W
8114~ 21n /I14/S rtOY SCA 32 W A iu{l y� tt tr
itei�1
&xw Ott w.y 19rA 6,1,a to, r 7
tb" & wa -w Q42 Grua= 74tGp W VIp ytt.rtl tut�Ar Wt LW
/SUM y
arwr6w W&WPM� e ° °� (t V" j�ily�W�
IyY wm, ,I.a ales, aMo LUL YLL AtruY
tiA,e.,g AY.dyI W IrWiwYWty 'ry K *-W. WIN vM
Yt�ttollnc
G'°waw k� Problems with the umdo."eaK dk, ►"dti2A/ HY
W Yayt ru Hewnyr '�"u Fair Pay Amendment•• n nY �
rr./27 tvy ""srwaw= w: 7fr�°/ta W Ypno yV ��rYrw
/ %t *u. rnol.w 71r tr�Wr �y wPNi41e W ty4 Ygpq�tYy R77 ns yu4rYlYlsrYa�
Its 7uhju
M+/.rtYy x /4/M. /IRAN D "If WWOVY tau tr ti W Y• --Vmv t/t} �t ffiaft� /MA xMA%. Y uNy CYi2tr�flu � � Y ID TSu 6RWtti tytrA;y
"TAN + //GAGS . V44W tttMlyl °/ �W d@4�A an rlwMGtmyrr/10W'� at "q-u S. ,
21 Tb putduttrl/ wlr* trww /f aura Wyly C+7fuult'Aeo jt yR luda�yAA =a w� kb ft Ww�n a;
'awipt/ b.r.let •NIrA �°YS ttq taw y /tt►Y A vt�/tt Wmt �'W
in
Nnn Fair P+YAm
inftW
OY L onyy llyo t ive
O
to W.�LfIYh
y�.y11NW '
ey�B (MY
Ghkmh I A.*n*wt Y4 AM4XCNpLeW . 4nY. sti r3 � Va q ty _
�� ~LNO'b s�
NYY =�fM4Y ilt w..___ tW -own
to EYooff N44nryay� Wy
44 beam 01O�r1rYsw�Ma IiO(
Ib go" tN M�Y�MJIM W.V
ad W��awox
p+'W alakt�Y� tlV.arq
r a W lb+Ya OPW itrYJw1Y�� W
Mftdwy#,Mm
d�NWMr�d~w. C4rquYrlW Vp
Oua>tirWrr W�7
aveyt N Ur wn � adz �Jta
t`ygy. Ol y. tY"Uty py"uyp left
lMr
40"dW y'M rWM the was a
p -mu
71tWnywvN N"'� IN
UM
to
Y� �r � 4yu�!YgN W pµ�yl:Yo
b4C�wa NYY'atlwa Wy e
a�i b WMjrwyy�r NYIr�A'"'tl��dwgy
� WytLy ~WAN sail" W
"SCMONIILAnldtllL ~
AnYI, +irt4l NW ptiy=Y
,16" YV. ✓tisur I7NW Y�
44w., tO�
amott V. >tb Nu44ou faA
a nu"Y::* n btttw s N W
Gym� O4�" b. =rk. "�" w b
awaJNF" °fj�MlWJatypa"tyyy��v
71r� ry f_
U.he rldwb4w""L ad W-w.0M
7I. _
orwt
�IVI�aA.nrLYr .7wriy p
Y�wktYIt tir Lam"
.'^r ythL eM16 VL��ttY.to�lls0*rk�ypYr.yy
N71CU VL of A Ad
r" 4aWr Ns O
M
m
N
z
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 2, 1986
TO: City Council and City Mosie''rppee
FR0:1: Lloyd Rubos, City Engineer
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FOR.'UTI. OOffFF(( ES D ISTRI tt
D
Subsequant to preparation 0 the Council aged@ staff has Dann in
ewers, petition and the projjects Aboundsry tmap. This infonutiopn Is
supplemental to your previous Council picket. The Stone and Youngberg
agreement follats previous agreements on other Districts done in the
City. Staff rtcoemends approval of the sgreeeent.
uUlr
Attseheents
STONE & YOUNGBERG
� ,.mot gym "a.,tt
March 6, 1909
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Dail
9320 Base Lino) Moad
P.O. Box 107
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Bet City of Rancho Cucamonga raprovennot Monds
me
Storm Drain Assessment District
Dear Members of the City Councils
ibis letter will serve As an agreement between the City of
tancbo Cucamonga and Stone a Youngberg to serve 1a Managing
Mderwriter to the City until the parties enter into an actual
ra chase Contract regarding the negotiated sale of the City#■
xnptive%tnt Bonds to be ivaed by the City pursuant to the
rsaroveaent Act of 1913 (the •Bonds•) and the Procedural Act of
1913.
°au have informed as that the City intends to issue tha Banda to
PrrcvJde funds to finance various public improvements and for
purpose require: the services of a Managing Underwriter to
structure the financing and to rates into a Purchase Contract
that is agreeable to both parties.
As Managing Underwriter, we will use our utmost efforts to raise
funds at the most reasonable rates attainable in the market
under than existing conditions. In asp Lfication o! the
understanding between the City and the Managing Underwriter,
Stone a Youngberg agrees to undertake tae below - listed services
and functions.
A. dtreclurine the !in _ lyst
1. Stone a Youngberg will work with pour staff in developing
the scope of the financial feasibility and 2ss4dsing the
marketability of the project.
2. Stone a Youngberg will work with the City's bond
counsel recommending upecific terms and ronditiocs
affecting the basic security of the Bones.
{* K7f{AmmammleewUlMaelRla tet•aa Ha11lVWA CAMOP Mh 32 -o"W"a
k+
City Council
City Rancho Cucamonga
March 6, 1986
Page -2-
7. Stone a Youngberg will prepare the teat of an offering
memorandum for sale of the securities. Said mesorand=
will include a dasariptlon of the bonds and their
secarity, and pactiseat financial and econowia data.
In preparation of such prospectus, we will ererciss do*
diligence in the ascertainment of all material facts
aid circumstances r"arding the project and their
disclosure in the prospectus.
•. Stone a Youngberg will be present at any necessary
Information rAoting or meetings.
S. If the City so requests, we will assist in arranging
the selection of a paying agent.
D. Marketing the parch.
1. The Managing Underwriter will use its best efforts to
accomplish the formal marketing at the earliest data
possible consistent with monad investment bnnkirg and
underwriting principles. It is intended that, once
purchased 1 atone a Youngberg, the bonds will be ro-
otfered to the poblie on the basis of an immediate
;Orafide publ a ..fering.• stone a Youngberg may
fora a group of investment banking firms for the
purpose of underwriting and selling the bonds.
2. Stone a Youngberg vill submit an offer to the City to
purchase the bonds at least three working days prior
to the final confirmation of the assessments, subject
to pertinent rexolutions, the offering Memorandum, and
all other necessary documents, approvals, and
proceedings governing such Bonds havirg been determined
by bond counsel, the City, and the Managing
Underwriter satisfactory in all respeato for financing
purposes. if, after cagotiations with Stone a
Youngberg Li good faith, the City and f'ton0 a
Youngberg fail to agree on terns of sale of the bonds,
the City may terminate this agreement, then offar the
boads for 5810 to others.
1. The City agrees to cooperate with Stone a Youngberg to
make available copies of sconomic and fivase}al
91
City Council
City rancho Cucamonga
March 6, 1466
Page -l-
reppoorts, agreements, contracts, resolutions, and other
to avant documents pertaining to the project, the City
or the bonds an reaoonably may be required from time to
time for prompt ad efficient performance by Stone 6
youngWrg of their obligations hereunder.
Z. atone a Youngberg shall pay its own out -oS- pocket and
other expenses, the cost of the ?reparation of the
Offering NONOrandax, Underwriter s Counsel, Slue Sky
and Investment Memoranda used by the Underwriters and
.11 advertising exi»nses in connection with the public
Offering of the bonds.
3. She City shall pay from the proeeeda of the bonds or
other fonds o! the City all coats and expenses
customarily paid therefrom, including the cost of
Printing the bonds, and other documents, the fees and
expenses of its legal counsel, bond counsel,
retaiconsultants, accountants, ad experts
of any other eerts
nod by the City in connection with the financing.
1. It is expressly understood and agreed and the City
hereby recognises that in performing its activities
pursuant to a negotiated sale that stone a Youngberg is
acting solely on its own hebalf as the prospective
manager of an underwriting group which plans to submit
to the City a proposal to purchase the bonds for
resale. Nothing herein shall be construed to make the
Managing Underwriter an employs or financial, fiscal,
or other advisor of the City or to establish any
fiduciary relationship between the City and the
Managing Underwriter.
5. Thin agreement shall extend to the date of sale of the
bonds as ecntaaplated herein, when the formal bond
Purcha,e Contract is entered Into by the parties.
6. The City oay terminate this agreement if, after
negotiations in good faith, the City and Stone 6
Youngberg fail to agree on mutually acceptable terms of
gala of the bonds. Upon termination of this agreement,
Managing Underwriter dhereunder,hexcept thatothe City is
obligated to pay to the Managing Underwriter any
expenses incurred on behalf of the Clty pursuant to
W
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
March 6. 1996
Page -4-
sgeAo s the City to the Managing Underwritobehelt of
the Bndorrriters pursuant to section a of this
Your agreement.
constitute an agreement t
reementbetween� the City and the rBYedersigned.
Accepted this day of . it"
City eL Ceecho Cn...nnQ�_
BYs -
i�
cLB nc,%TE RE ADEQUACY
of
PL'PITlox
(�gapegp.�+r erS77er� No 86 1)
I, DWIGHT F. FRENCH, hereby certify as follows
1. That I am the duly appointed and acting Engineer of
Work for
ASSESBH@IT DISTRICT no. 46 -1
of the City of Rancho Cuzmznga (the sAsseavacnt District").
Z. That I have received and reviewed a Petition for the
Divisiont4oat the Streets aannd glghvaivarcode� requirements of
Property within the Assasssent District.
3. than 60% in area ofpthetpr,,..heoa�ybyji tube aisenen� nt for
the proposwd isprovaaants uithin the Assasasant District.
6. That the *owners of land* are those perr4ns who, at the
ties the Petition was filed with the City Clark, appear to be
ouch owners upon the County Assessor0s Roll, or, in the aasa of
transfers of land, appear to be such cwners on the records in the
County Assessor's office.
I declare under panalt+; of perjury that the above is true
and correct. L
Executed this a?/°Jday of �, 1916 a
California. to, ,,' .y
D3 wv F. FRENCH, DIC.
Sys 1...
Dwigpht F. French
Englnear of Work
. 71
( -;a "ClIrlol I
P =-Ica roa o G::s: cD cr L%mp.c%__.:s
A:tD ai-: —M 07 Or DrMZCU a Or
�X"'3 O� CXL2SOA:rL'n
T= C}iDEasIC.f'a, being c+rt--a of prcyar---j with!.& the area
as shoc+n on the plat attached to and =ads a yart of this Psi «ticn
as F.c:ibit "A ", which proper -.y will ba subject to assaz=trt for
the i=Prcve=ents herairaftar dascribad, hereby request the City
is inatitata Proceedings under the "Hunicipal L- yroveant Act of
19130, beL&y Divisicn 11 of the Streets and Highways Code, to
contract car -ain public works and i=yrove=ants and ncq%:isi`.Scns,
if necessary, generrll.y described ae follows:
Construction and installation of drainxgo i=prave-
=ests together with appurtanances and appurft.anant
work, acquialticn, it necaarasy, and incidental
expanses in connection therewith
(tha "Znyrova=ents").
THE IIMDR9SO:IED further request xach other apps- tenant work
that, in the opinion of the City, may be necessajrl to pi.•ope ly
F effectuate the =provaaants.
MM IIHDMSX== fur mar request that the City taka the
" dasignations specified as follows:
1. The an?iaea.-(s) daoignatad to was =e the rasyza-
" aibilities and pa--!c= tha duties of Xesess=nt
Engi near for the asaua:ent District shall be
` IYAIon r. nmcs, xNc.
1.
(the ".tssaas-•.an. Yagiacar"), subject to apyrrvai
c:
i at an Aq=aaart for P:.,7�aarS. -? Services.
r
2. The ur.dera:!.:ar desi ;..atad to pur:hasv, be -da
�. ragtaaea`:.'g unpaid aaaess =enta in the Ass "ss =ant
District stall be
STONE i YOD:I0M0
(the "Qndezuriter "), aubject to apprcvai of a 7•.-hase
Agraenant.
7. The ittarasy(s) desig=tad as land Cruaal for the
assasamont pracaadi::gs shall be
)IAZAM, Jut _i, EOn=v i °.CFA R=r
(the "Sand Counsal•), subjact to approval at an
Agrea =ant for Bond Counsel Saraices.
THE II:IDLRSIWM tun --Ur request that all efforts and
attarpta be made eo that eseessant procandings a= be initiated
and the Resolution of Intention can be adapted at the earliest
ti=a.
=M D:IDYaRS=MMD further agras that the city will ire= no
obli?ation for the pavuent of any eansultirg sorYlcss u=less
there is a succdasful confirmation at assessment anA sale of
bonds.
YH3 D:ID"-A'SZO = expressly roive the p_•acasdiags cr: all
limitations under the "Spacial Assessment Iavestigatioa,
Limitation and :Iajcrit-t protest Act of 19310, bei -g Divisian { at
the Strasta and Highways Code.
THIS P°^.ITI0:I YAY Im SZGM I:i cODDT_RpARr AnD CC:ISTrOT -
On P°': ^IC:7 A:iO wa r_a, A:ID )KY B:; C:ISOLIDA ^D imT.1 327L•LAa
PETITIONS XM WA17MS FOR SZ:MUR njMvEMr.s H°+' _v=I )LITIOIILD.
,
n
2.
Raaall• L. Rora!a 6p Na. 301-271-25M.
Aka Ro7all• L. Joheao0 66.4},47, 4 A2 y-r ��es',1'4 ��y'11�so.oiV
� V
z 3.
TN ST1CUb.
b�R /�
j49#rN« DMt
GJ I ! �A'�•Pr�G
GWPUL COAMUOr-
Pi
Qf'-om:
low A)"TO Of
y�1yry6. (JA�YLR GKAYLD
wwutz a+' rrrr��
IMAo
SAL Carr. �••��•
si <•iAUt� t)
a _�YA►weM *��
Aga Gwtw6 Arf
a
Swwo . NwaAL Baum..
uBaer: 7Y4 t� fiw.GA,�
Mr* � AL Pte"
r—GP —w t. cwvowo4.•
i
Cin OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM AOF f
DATE:
April 2, 1981
TO:
FROM:
nick Dahl, Councilmeaoer '
SPACES PER U911
Brad Buller, City planner
BY:
Otto Kroutil, Senior planner
SUBJECT:
I. COMPARISON OF AMAMI` AND CONOOMINIUN STkWMS
1.5
2. IINIMM DWELLING UNIT SIZES
Per your request, the following summary Outlines the differences bstwean
apartemnt and condominium development standards in me City. With few
esceptfOns, the City's CMIOWflt C040 besr.'t dfe :inguish O#ws. %lp
and rental units, t.e. condos and apart"nu, The Development Code
;deals with •mwltiple family. units regardless of anershlp status.
MwevOr, there arm some important differences, as follows:
1. PARKINS STAU=S:
The De+-e10pntot C04e separates apartments and townhouse/condo parking
requlrernts. The number of parking spaces for apartment units 1s lower
IS show? on the chart below:
Currently one covered space in a garage or carport is
multi - family projeett. repaired for all
Continued ......
ti
n
CUA.W PARKING REpuiRUWS
SPACES PER U911
Studio
Apartments T_wnhoule3 Condo's
I Bedroom
1.3
1.5
2 Bedroom
1.6
1.8
3 Bedroom
1.9
2.0
4 Bedroom
Yfsitor
1.0 per 4 W's
1.0 per 4 OU's
Currently one covered space in a garage or carport is
multi - family projeett. repaired for all
Continued ......
ti
n
thnao to Dick Dahl
• Comparison of Apartment S Cando Standards
Minimum Dwelling unit Sizes
April 2. 1985
Page 2
2. BUILDING CODE PROVISIONS:
The Uniform Building Code d'aun't distinguish between apartments and
condomfniums Par se, but dots have more stringent provisions for
attached units stiurated by antual roperty lines. Consequently,
ownership units located on their awn land require additional firewall
separations, and sap4rate servicas such as sewer, water, gas and
upgraded electrical capacity. Apartments and ownership units which do
not include ownership of land do rat have these additional restrictions.
The attached memo by the Building ONtcfal further clarifies the issue.
3. COUOONINIL01 CONYERSIONS•
The City has an ordinance regulating conversions of apartments to
condominiums. This ordfunce ovldes that prior to conversion of
existing apartments to condcninfuss, the wall and calling separations
between units moat be up to the most current baildin, cede standards.
The conversion ordinance doesn't establish condo standards that are more
restrictive than those for tpartmenlsl it simply requires that existing
buildings that were built to outdated standards be brought up to date
prior to corrversfon to for sale units.
4. SUBOIYIS[ON REQUIREMENTS
The StaW Subdivision Nap Act (which regulaAs the subdivision process
to Calffornta) requires the filing of a Tentative Tract tap and approval
aM recordation of a final Tract Map prior W the sale c: any ownership
units Mother or not land is involved, including •airspace
condoMnlus.
Rental ap4rtmmts an be built and finaled without a Tract Nap to most
CASH. A legal lot of record or a Parcel Nap is all that is required by
State law.
S. MINUMN DUELLING UNIT SIZES
Attached, you will also find the results of a telephone survey relative
t.o minimum writ sizes conducted last summer. In general, some of those
interviewed indicated the intent for having minimum requirements was the
desire for better quality development in those cam Ries.
I hopo this information answers your questions.
BB:OK:jr
Attachments
4.
` aGy
STAFF TELEPHONE SURVEY, August 16, 1985 N
CT(Y
I
�MTMUN Cf1ELLiMC IAIIT SIZES
CHINO
No Standards , possible new standards now being considered,
r IRVINE
So Standards - Just use UIC
FOMTAMA
Dwelling Unit Site Based on Zoning as Follows:
9-1 Minim= Lot Site 7,200 sq. ft. - all Ri Zones
All Single Family Units
R -1 -C 1,100 sq. ft.
R -1 -0 1,200 sq. ft.
R -1•E 1,300 sq. ft.
R -I -F 1,400 sq. ft.
R_2 BSO $4. ft. if single family dotathed
650 sq. ft. if molt( -frily
(
R_3 850 sq• ft. if single family detached•
So0 sq, ft. if multi wly
MONTCLAIR*
Minimum Site Based on Owellin7 Unit Type as Follows:
ngle
(a) 31 Family DataOeh'J Units:
2
bdraas - I , ta q
3 bdrw or more - 1.400 sq. ft.
•(b) Multi - F (Apt. i Condo)
1 bdro 950 sq. ft.
2 bdras 1,200 sq. ft.
3 bdrms 1,400 sq. ft.
4 bdras 1,450 sq. ft.
Minimum Room Site of 110 sq. ft.
All dwelling units require 2-car garage,
no carports
ONTARIO
No Standards
t •
Y<s
` aGy
a
UPtARO
ZORE
N54 Fastl Ianrs
R -S -15
R -S -10
R -S -7.5
R -S-6
MUltt- rw`_!I� ?-Ms
R -M-4.4
R- M- 3.6(c)
R -M -3.6
R -M -2.0
R -M -1.5
5 eclal
ti
.• 1
Owll!ng Untt 5120 Standards as Follows:
MIM. 107 AREA MIR. 0 U SIZE
sq. Ti q. t.
1S,Op 2.000
10,000 1,600
7,500 1.400
6,000 900
30'M
I.O ld
15,000
16,000
1,000 /du
1,000 /du
7,500
$00 - Bachelor
700 - 1 Bdrm
O00 r 2 Sdrm
1.000 - 3 Odra
1.000 sq. ft. for
a 1 Bedroom plus
200 sq. ft. for
additional Bedroom
f%
i
•r d
C
C- r S'AF"
DATE, I4sy 14. 1980
TO: Plenning iaatoa BL v =
mm. b»
J La
a. L, Director of Co�i4 Da"a pasot
6Tr garry C. 80"0- Senior llaaaer
iDTJCCT, ?ARTRC C�1MAN �AIG�fGIQZq N0. 80.01 - Opypp CC.
rat of a C°odoatoim'� Ord,;X. �D[R4TDr - The der
Coaracsioa oiop-
+ +
This 2 it" bee baea before t j
Over
bp 1t P l t o on That@ eusi y he��d.ora have disc astoru us C*nvar"cm
control that a Coadostptius `Coarrsoloe rMi 30th @s ate to fccoa�e eoacenws oi-
ws subject to t t degrees"
Since April 30th w hew seupted filing on Sums
and the em"t'sioa at 425 aN Lewis 3mme
haw subsitgl of Craskafdo py�y cuts to MWOKLKloloM� Us al
C condoainiues. Aad addleloaall
of the duplaxss on y then are playabelM pep red forth@ OO
raenberaf Sea o rdlt toad south of the �hillc Le". ad for thhOujJ be
efao
that w haw _
down torapproxiletehly n iin rpar�toaOrsiloa�ft 3% dwui°t unit, . (l�n�iu as
W have oxiset y 70, in single fsally and 302 to a dtittple eellY The Vast End
ccasants of the City corrected ttorney.'a S of the propotad erdtoanea that
opinion by the pyry ag then did SneluAea t
suggest that t snag Cadiasieo on Mat Ger etas to to a as
fulov what they feel should be 1,p os Changed. Ordinance Page by paf�o� staff
Reaper Cully ttad
\ \\
JACK LAM
Dlraeeor of Conamity Devalo
paeat
JLt88tcd
Attachmat
w
ORDINANCE N0.
JN OPJ)I1M4M OF TM CITY COIACClL OF THE CITY OF RAW"
tTiCNiLM, CALIFORNIA. MENDING TSLr ZONING MINANa
SY ESTABLISHING REQUIRigNFNTS FOR THE CDNNEPSION
OF APARTIiM To CONOONINILMS
1114 City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follow:.
SECTION 1• PURPOSES:
A. The City Council finds and d,:4rmtnes that the commrstons of
aparbents to community apartments, stock cooperatives are
condominiums affoct the public health, safety, and welfare:
and that such projects, which are subject to the subdivision
regulations of tk,4 State of California, should be regulated by
local ordinance. The City Council detaroines a need to regulate
the comerstons of existing buildings to coaee:nity apartments,
stock cooperatives and condominiums so as to:
1. Encourage a balanced supply of rental ane awnershlo
housing in the cOmunitr• and a variety of clrotces of
tenure, We, price, and location of housing.
2. Nnintain and ena.lrage the supply of affordable
ha %sing, bath ownership and rental, for lo*4nd-
noderate tncae persons and •faailles: end
7. Promote the residential Stability and w..nitty of the
eascuntty by developing neighborhood identity,
discouraging displacement of residents, and frill-
" toting affordable hoe Ownership opportunities and
rent&) ownership opportunities for the coasunfty.
C TM City Council, therefore, states its express lntait to set such
surdaros and regulations rscessary to insure that apartments and like
structures being converted will be in the hest interest of the ceee mitt'.
SECTIOtt 2: DEFINiTiiM'S
The words and terms used in this Chapter shall have the following
MAIM unless the context clearly indlutes othtrwlse:
A. Canmitr A ap rt'*nt: Cc"=Ity Apartment as defined in
Section 11064 of the Businoss and Professions Code,
sxnteining two or more rights of exclusive occupancy.
CCondominlHU* Condominiums as Jfintd in Section 1350 of
Me Civil Code: 'AM estate of real property consisting
of an undivided interest in cocmon areas, together with a
separate right of o ership in space.'
U, n J
C. Conversion: The process or act of subdivisioq, in accordance
with the Subdivision Nap Act, of existing rental dwelling
units into eonwtominims, eoeeunity apartments or stock
cooperatives.
B. Pest Raoort: M inspection and written report crmforming
to the requirements of Srctlon 8516 of the Busl'ress and
Professlu" Code of the State of California including
dOcuA*ntation of conditions ordinarily subject to attach
by wad destroying pests and organisms.
`1
eeee�
K i
2
�,c
3 a
E. Project: Project means a andceiniue, cmwnity, apart-
ment, and stock cooperative.
F. Stock Cooperative: Stock cooperative as defined in
Section 11003.2 of the business and Professions Code.
Property consisting of dwelling units owned by a corporation
whereby shareholdurs receive a right of exclusive occupancy
in a portion of the real property owned by the corporation.
SECTION 3: APPLICATION INFORMATION REQUIRED
No Tentative flap for the purpose of conversion will be accepted for
filing unless it is accocpanied %Y an application which in addition
to the infoteation required by the Subdivision Nap Act and the
Subdivision Ordinance, contains all of the following infomation
aW documentation:
A. Specific Reouire rents:
I. she applicant's projected percentage of the existing
txaaber of tenants needed to buy their dwelling unit
in order to sake the conversion project economically
feasible
2. Estirated market value of each unit:
n
..
6
3. Terms of proposed assistance, dtscnunt, or other
C financing program to be offered, if any, to present
residents for the purpose of subsequent unit purchase;
1, proposed prograi of relocation assistance to be
offend by the applicant, if any;
S. Makeup of extsttng tenant households, including
featly size. length cf residence, age of tenants,
and whether receiving federal or state rent subsidies;
6. proposed Homeowner's Association fee;
T. ilsmas and addresses of all tenants. MMn the subdivider
an demonstrate that such information is not available,
this requirement wy be aardlfted by the Community
Development Department.
S. The subdivider shall "Bit evidence that,& certified
letter of notification of intent to convert was sent
M each tenant for whoa a signed cozy of said notice
is not submitted.
9. A report of field test by a qualified i"dM4$dcet
testing agency as specified to the Uniform euilCtng
Code showing Mat the wall separatior,, and the fluor
and ceiling separation. between units shall provide
L
the same airborne sound insulation as required by
1
. s =
the most current Uniform Building Code requirements
adopted by the City. If the report shows that these a�
standards are not met then the applicant shall `
indicate that he kill complete improveeients necessary
to "t those requirements prior to aqy sale of said
ti
converted apartments. In casrs where efts are
occupied by tarants, who have initiated a contract
far the purchase of the units, tha improvements for
such soundproofing shall be complete prior to the
sale of the unoccupied units.
10. A copy of the proposed declaration of covenanV,,
condftlons and restrictions which will apply and
which shall include an +greewt for common area
maintenance, including fecilitits and landscaping,
together with an estimate of the initial assessment
fees anticipated for such maintenance; a description
of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access
areas within the project; and an indication of
appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all
utility lines and services for each unit.
11. A physical elements reports which shall include but
not be limited to: `
l +) A report detailing the condition and estimating
{ the remaining useful life of each element of
le; -
ii
ME,
�C*
the Protect Proposed for conversion: 4tvfs,
foundations, exterior paint, paved surfaces.
mechanical system. electric 1 system. ptuabfng
systems, including saxage systems, $wneing
Pots, sprinkler :)stern for landscaping,
utility delivery systems, central or coommity
heating and air - conditioning system9 fire
protection systems including automatic sprinkler
systems, Aare system, or standpfpo system,
and structural elamonts. Such report shall be
Prepared by an appropriately licensed contractor
or architect or by a registered Civil or structural
engine%? other than the aver. For any elaemnt
%those useful life is less than five (5) years,
a rePlacemant cost estimate shall be pra fded.
(b) A structural pest control report. Such report
shall be prepared by a licensed structural pest
control operator pursuant to Section 8516 of
the Business and Professions Code.
(c) A building history report lneludirg the following:
(1) Ti.e date of ronstructlom of all elenents
Of the proluct:
(2) A statement of the njor uses of said pro-
Ject since construction-,
6
(7) The date and description of each major
repair or renovation of any structure or
structural element since the date o. con-
structlon. For the prrposes of this sub -
section a "aalor repair" shall man any
repair for which an axperditure of more
than 51,000 was rode;
(4) Statasent regarding current ownership of
All ie "VMnts and underlying land;
(S) Failure to provide lnforeation required by
subsections (1) through (4), inclusive,
shall be accompanied by an affidavit,
given under penalty of perjury, setting
forth reasonable efforts undertaken to
discover such information and reasons why
said information cannot be obtained.
12. Evldexe that a notice of Intent to convert shall be
delivered to each existing tanmt's dwelling unit.
1M fors of the nstics shall be as approved by the
toaWnity Develapeent Dowrtnent and shall contain
nrt less than the following:
(a) Haes and address of current owner;
(b) Nave and address of the proposed subdivider;
(c) Appr+tfeate date on wifch the tentative map is
Proposal to be filed;
(d) Appmxieate date on Witch toe final map or
Parcel map is to be filed;
(e) Approximate date on which the unit is to be
vacated by nonpurchasing tenants;
(f) Tenant's right to purchase;
(9) Tenant's right of notification to vacate=
(h) Tenant's right of teralnetion of lease;
(t) Provision for special uses; and
(!) Provision of moving expenses.
(k) Tenant's Right to Purcia_ se. As provided to
Goverment Code Section 66427.1(6) eny Present
tentant or tenants of any unit shall be given a
rontrensferable right of fist refusal to
Purchase the unit occupied at a Price no greater
than the Price offered to the general Public.
The right of fbst refusal shall extend for at
least sixty (60) days from the date of issuance
of the Subdivfsion Public ftepart or comence_
nrnt of sales, whfcf'Ovsr ate is later.
(1) Vacation of Units. Each non - purchasing tenant,
V not in default user thn obligitfons of the
rental agrement or louse under witch he occupfas
his unit, shall have not less than one hundred
„s.
a
SECTIOR R:
elghtY (180) days from the date of recaipc of
notification from the c ner of his intent to
convert, or from the filing date of the Final
Subdivision ihp, whichever date is later, to
find substit•:te l&jjing and to relocate.
(a) Other information as MY be deemed necessary by
the Community 00e1oPment Wartment.
13. Other information which, in ♦Fa opinion of the
Director of Coceunity Development, will assist in
determining whether the proposed project is con.
sistent with this chapter.
PROPUM DEVELOPW —n SiMOMS
A. Deneral_ p_ i`ts: No Final $Up for the purposes of
condominium conversion will Fe accepted for filing unless
the following requtrmnts, which shall be conditions-of
approval of the tentative mp are approved:
1. Etch dtellina unit shal' conform to anent noise
and energy insulation standards required by the
latest adopted Uniform Building Code or other
applicable law or regulation.
2. Each unit shall hmve installed seoko detectors as
required by the latest adopted edition of the
Uniform Building fade.
3. For each unit there shall ba provide _ •'niaum of
9
two Covered, On -site parking spaces per wait in a
10
garage or carport, plus 20f of " total spaces
provided for guest parking.
4. Each dusl"rg unit shall be separatcly oottred for
gas, electricity and water unla;s,the City aporoyes
A plan for equita..,) sharing of comnai matct-tng.
5• Each unit shall C» provided with separate water
shut -off valves
6. Each area for trash pl&:ament And pickup shall be
adequately dasignatcd anj all refuse shall be
recroed on c ragalarly scheduled basis from the
prentses.
C
7. Permanent mchanicai Mf;rment which the Building
ONIC10 determines is a potential source of vibra-
tion or noise shall be shock mounted or isolated, or
otherwise mounted in A winner approved by the
Building Official to lessen the transmission of
vibration and noise.
B. llluminated addresses, and if four.J necessary by the
planning Coemission, directory map$, for ail units
shalt be prominently displayed from appropriate
public or private access within or adjacent to the
project.
9. At least 125 cubic feet of enclosed, weatherproof,
_ `
lockable storage space is to be provided for each ti
�.,.
i r
'
'.'n
e
;Y
unit. 7hfs storage space shall be to addition to
that ordfnarfiy contained within each unit. it may
be either within or exterior to, but shall bear a
reasonable lteatforzl relationship to each unit.
10. A laundry area shall be provided in each unit; or if
eoaaon laundry areas are Provided, such facilities
shall consist of not less then ono automtfc washer
and dryer for each five units or fraction thereof.
i1. The applicant shall Provide written certification to
the bm+yer of Back nit on the initial $ale after
conversion that any dlshwashars, garbage disposals.
stoves* refrigerators. hot water tanks, and Sir_
canditfoners that are provided are In wortfng condf_
tfan as of the close of escrow. At such tine as the `
Homeowner's Association takes over management of the
development, the applicant shall Provide written
certification to the Association that any pool and
Pool equfpment and any appliances and mechanical
a pM"t to be owed in commn by the Association
is to working condition.
3. APPtiCATion REQUIREMENTS
The applicant shall Provide the City with a tentative subdivision map in
canforaanca with the State Subdivision Map Act aid local ordinance and a 12
development plan of the project including, but not limited to:
l 1. dimensions and location of each bjflding or unt., and the
location of all fences or wolis.
2. building elevations %dicatmg the type of construction material
existing and pmMscd;
3. typical floor plans of existing units with square fcotages of
esch room indicated and the number of units per plane
4. location of common area and Am"ittes existing or proposed;
S. location and dimensions of parking garage, carport, parking
Carea, access -ways, AN any cthtr on.sitr area marred for
vehicular us*$
6. location of Aress far vateflor storage space for lndisldual
occupants.
�. lihdscspe plan per City 1jgndlhdl whith 1peetfies proposed
troll, shrubs, plants, and ground cover, and indicates exist.
IM landscape massing. Species, quantity, and sites shall be
indicated for proposed iandiciping only.
L
.3
0
B. Any Othqr information that the Director of Comunitty0e10 is
dams necessary to date' ins whether the Proposed
consistent with this chapter.
SECT
IOM S. a�TI
In the went that any of the property 0,,-,Opmt Standards required for
the Conversion causes practical difficulties, an determined to be
unnecessary or would result in exces'iv�ts Waive" e PUrnlns only -Co be made
eay waive. reduce or amdify the raga for individual
for parking, laundry facilities, storage provisions
units, and noise and energy rsquirene ts.
SECTIGM 6: COM9ERSIDN LIMIT MIOCEM
A. MM Limit. The City shall appmria the corvarston of
no more than one -half (y) the number of multi - family
rental dwellings Added to the City's housing stock (i.e.
dwAlling units completed and rcady for occupancy) daring
the preceding year. in any one calendar yaAr. The mmber
of multi - featly rental units added in one ycar shall be
determined As follows:
from January 1 through December 31, the total number of
multi - family rental units given a final building in-
spection and Occupancy Parma minus the m=ber of such
units demolished, removed from the City, or converted to
ran- residcntiat use.
0
14 e
C
If aPproval for a project expires Prior to recordation of
the Final Tract Map for that project, the number of
duelling units provided in the expired project shall be
added to the allocation. in the calendar year of expiration.
For a one-time only basis, this ordinance aluil establish ._
dwelling units available for conversion in 1990.
B. Time Limit. Any multi - fsaily rental unit constructed
aftrr the effective date of this ordinance $1hall be
allowed to convert to condominivas subject to the pro-
visions of this ordinance, five years from the data of
the final occupancy of the project.
SECTION 7: ACTION BY PLANNING COMIISSION
A. The City shall make the following findings in addition to
the findings otherwise required for a Tentative T -nct
Map in order to approve a Tentative Tract Hap far the
PurPUV of conversion:
1. the proposal is compatible with the objectives,
policies, elements and Programs specified in tho
General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
L
2. the design or improvement of the project is con- t0
�9
sistent with applicable, general and spetifle plans.
0,
• a, the proposal is consistent with the p,rp 3,.s of tnls =S
chapter.
4. the proposal promotes with the health, se ety and
welfare of the residents of the City.
The action of the planning Comission is final vrless
appealfed in writing to the City Council within fifteen
(15) calendar days.
SECTION 0: The ilayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark
shall attest to the saaw, and the City Ctork stall cause
the saes to be publish.d witAn fifteen (15) days after
its passage, at least once in The Gaily y-t , a am-
Cagr of ganeral circulation publisted in the City of
Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _„ day of ,
1904.
AYES:
NOES:
AOSEIR
James C. frost, hayr.r
ATTEST:
U.oran 0• Mcssert:an, CSty Clerk
CS. Y OF RANCHA CUCA310NGA
IMIRML 01 UNDUM
c
DATE: reb rusry 3 'r^
, 1996
TO: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City ' �er
FROM: Otto Kroutfl, Senior Flamer�`�
SUWELr. LAW OSE RECCIOiMGATIOYS t THE CITIZENS ADVISORY
per oaff �
Initiated brthe Citizens :. Y mry Coewlssfann�s r*cOMndatias to the city Counel relatfvn to the city$: i'neral Plan:
r11 10 IfBS - The CAC pass's a resolution recesea:rdteg substantial
acress• re r'fw¢tfons in densft,v in all our restdentfal and nsa
eatagorfes from Loy Midfus and higher.
Agrfl 17 ISM - The City Council re!ars the Advisory COAMSSfon's
Pluming emission for review and racoewendatfo. with
Council review of the lesuas sduduled for itzy 15, 19ff5.
Na 0 1985 - Z Flannfnq Coewissim revitws the various policy
re c —ti rs;Tn! roaches cors'nsus lndfratfng that xrebe- the -board
reduetfons of denslt,Y fn the etraral plan es recoewanded try the CAC
would not of declrsbie at this ties. K wtvsr, As to the ravfning
alteroatfves, than as a split vatw in the 'bsente of one
Comissfaner. two votes fn support of alternative to look at sites
on a case -by -case basis, and two votes in support of the no chasgt
alternative.
cwo ss an9 recap nd&ticoa Council egWuests A c rtMnstri 1takPatMLhi
I ssue of aultf- fAsi,f unit growth with speclffc nforwatfon ref: steel of
statf. The policy altematfves to be addressed and -brought back by
staff for CovncfI eonsfdarstfOR include:
A. The effect of financing tneentives and multf•fasfiy bonds on
growth in the City;
B. Controls on rate of growthigrowth imnagment;
C. Ccntrols on davelopaent through up- grsded davtlopunt
standards; end
0. ReductfOA of Qtnsftfei through reconsider: ion of the Oentral
Plan in specified areas or efty -wide.
t
III
Meeo to Sob Ri:to
MCAC Lam use Recoiaendatlons
Feb ary 3, 1906
Page 2
Au st 21 1473 - Following a lengthy renew of the n
xTl oats not to pursue eay of the ilttrnct� n :senntt d. ~
Ths MGM" is to take ne action and mow foruerd on other busieets.
The attached mterlais include k+y reports and oiautes for your nricw.
Cif: jr
CC: Drad Duller
can Coteera
g
J
':'Ty OF R" - %CHO CUCAMONGA
MEMOAA"614
ipru 10. 1985
rot Nkyor teed Hmedt#rs of city Coutul
"nSM7 Cnaitato11 Nabors
art gobert 1. ttue /1,/
Lasistsat to City fltseger. �frf�
W1 =1 fad Ose /.potwsdatieas by gdvl2*77 Camisrlea
!a`' %iaory c2missios at its throb 22, 1985 metisg r e11dN
and tt the �lov4t9 lafet�atfos N forwarded to
wing Ceaalssios for 4*sldomtl". the City Council
The Ad�laory Casaisni*s t1ods ad 1'te*sseads u tillawst
CWe ALSIn Kent ream bl*. rlatata a tva7 oarprorts.nt to
:1tla City tows allowed the xostruatioe ,if larso asouata of
high durity dwelling durlag the past Eye years.
4wopva" h Gnity d71✓ p*�tawitiag aproy. ts approved or
the rianu Kgalt�ilw �:ra are tneosalateet with
resource, act prate of thL C.rty, deteriorate ewer
,arleaa unseiuoedes of enwding.
swift and aertoin Rasta Mat be placed an the peviiteratioe
high deuity, dwellis9 Pv.,aW.
Therefore, it L hereby
LA
Cotmo "tern t tbs Advisory Coatasl*n rocosneay to the City
:*111¢9 otyt�aap as oCgthlsedC�4i n that the general plate and
M allowable deruity rsa9ea y .seeded to affect a araada
along the following Oddellnest
Continued....
is
C
April 10, 1483 2 Lead Use tea
acseedatLaaa
NAM 2 slu
Now
Feorosfo
t1 ao
ehaaie ae dim,
m ahacg•
in 44
m
MR w124 s7-6
g 2M30 10-13
= 19 or mrs 14-19
CU!
i=M further that any Lala]aaoa tUa or••t•a L the
industrial obwdi plaaa Should M idjWWW h onoeratal and
UMLM' farther that the cat•pry arm represuts Iat•w•
detolopmat, that it be pomtted •• N e,ote then 1/10 d if
aoeditioaal usetu � land aM tmt It be oeatroued b
all ticrABa or posit atsedsrds utioa deaaad aaelierstiaa er
allater nigh deaaity to a degree that they free ew
Sapaot ld the reaevreod lad adverse uffeats of
�0'AL+e[ thea could a °a d"Lliag usit to he 4". .f
Zr you lease feel f = NAY a weL6w �M regNie� thin rtter,
iLtaAs
.�.�war .•.nWr�. �'ti�±h.r.... »r. . »... wti...sM:w .. {N'�...
C
C
1 C
DATE:
TO:
rROM:
BT:
SUBJECT:
CRY OF RANCHO CUCKO \GA
STAFF REPORT
May 8, 1985
Chairsun and lksebers of the Planning, Comisslon
Rick Gomot. City Planner
Otto Kroutil, Senor Planner
ef';v+
.f
u
LAW USE R
WWm
te, EtGMffNDATIOMS By THE CiTi2Fh5 AOYtSOAy
1. ABSTRACT. Thi► report Outlines CAC recommendations on General Plan
ens y "reductions, and notes the implications. It also Provides
policy options to be considered by the Comission. Staff is
seeking policy direction only., for rttaemaandation to the City
Council.
I1. "aGROUMO: At a recent Citizens Adviscry Commission meeting, e
reso ut on was passed recommending to the City Council a
reconsideration of the residential categories in the City's General
Plan. The CAC Resolution, Attached to this report as Exhibit •A•,
recommends substantial across the board reductions in densities in
all residential land use categories from low Medium and higher.
Specific CAC reco mondations are noted below:
Land Use GGaory Existing, pMEO
Yl 0 2— irp'�an =
L 2.4 No Change
IN 4-8 5.6
M 8.14 7-9
IH 14 -24 10 -13
M 24 -30 14 -18
In addition, the CAC recomrsended that for densities above 19 urlts
to the acre, a category of *Is (representing intense development),
be created. This cateeggory would be parmittod on no more than 084-
tenth of a percent (1e) of the residentially zoned land in the
City and would be controlled by a Conditional Use Permit process,
whiry would demand aamelioration of 411 effects of high density to
a degree that they have no greater tact on the rasoureas and
adverse affects of crowding than would one &.411ing unit per acres.
The reasons for this recoamendation by the CAC are also stated in
the resolution (please see resolv'cton for specific text). They Can
be sua wrized as follows:
ITL4 0 mw °
PLaNI NG COMNISSIOF TAFF REPORT
CAC Land Use RecoA Jations
Page f Has
1. Desire to maintain a rural environment in the City:
2. Construction of large e%Wnts of high density -
projects in the past;
�. Mueber of high density projects already approved; ,
4. Too many such high density projects are inconsistent
with the wishes of the residents of the City.
The City Council has briefly considered the CAC resolution and
referred the item to the Planning CommisSlan for review and
recommendation on the general direction the City Council should
We on this matter. The item is scheduled for Council review
(basic policy issues only) at the May 15, IM City council
meeting.
IIi. ANALYSIS• The recommendations made by the CAC have far- reaching
Vii�—itions affecting just about ail development related ern:
under the City's jurisdiction. Adoption of the CAC recassendatlons
as presented to the City would necessitate savor changes in the
City's General Plan and other regulatory documents affecting �bilc
policy. To Implement the recommendations, the following plans and
documents w*u :S require modification:
rem rall Pl�anl, Revisions to several mandated elwmts of the
arEan elan would be required, including land use, cira:lation,
housing, public safety, and recreation, to correct in imbalance
between housing and comsercW /Industrial uses, to reassess demand
for infrastructure sr.dify servic *, provisions, etc. The changes
would be required to pprorovidt internal consistency among all
mawiated General Plan elenrts. This would be a major effort
involving substantial resources.
Zonin osv icamsnt Oistricq M Modify designations for
cons s ency with the ra an aa: assure balance among General
Plan and zoning categories.
catc�for est u assure Restructure onslstecy with generalmmPlan. Modify
specific developoent standards to be reflective of new density
ranges. Develop criteria for "I' designation as recommended by y
C
r
PLANNING c tYlssiar/'TAFF REPORT
CAC Land Use Racoad,,t+tlans
Page i Il85
to the fYlctarfI Plarr4d�
wau Othor ne u to 1" &Mftlon� to the regulatory docuMnts. the City
proy9ras and long-term
reassess its its c pital fsprovseent prp�I Parts
districts prcvidi��servlces in4.he city ould special
their long-range pi among and tsplw+nt+tla7.
All these es then would require a CoordlnatW Mfart on the part of
the City's vsr'ous dapartrmts and special districts.
the CAC to* s ann Rill arfsslon Concur with LM r*COCMWatfons of
effectively with all the nKessrrya cita c s and woo incorporate
inc r da +t
these changes into Fiscal 85-86 prograe year for City Ca:+dt
review.
IV. "alt1' eapre T Y ' should the Ceawlssfon Concur with so" of to*
ratuctant to atteeot wholtsele Advisory s On but City's General
Plan and related doev.entsI ether policy options Could
density wi TMete options Could result in an overall reduction to
density with particular emphasis on those areas the Cocalssfol
eight Consider appropriate.
The first gvastfon that must be answered is whether or Oat whatever
the General Plan fOr dwtside of tthla pininedicmwnitfunailyaffecting
in the area Ilovurned by the Devalop^19 % Coda). Staff will need
$ Pe.tfic direction in this area.
•allowing options: will' as fsadbsck on the
PLANNING COtMISSIM TAFF REPORT
CAC Land Use Rec .dations
may C 1985
Page ;
C
%ion A: Reduction to, CHIC Lath Use Catasnrfrs poly
m s wm id Inynlye rev tCw o B Y ua
possible modifications. Since a use categories for
CAC an densities above 19 du /ae;�xthecCOMISSfononcern to the m4y consider modifying the Pet and H cat wish to
categories as follows:
Des1 nattx Exlstln� Proposed
" -s� aYIaC .R7- Jc
Densitles above 19 du /ac
permitted with specific
findings only (CUP 1)
H 24-30 du /ac
24-27 dv /ae
Densities above 27 du /ac
Permitted with specific
findings only
These sPraW a Initheahiggher danfly result tegin narrowing the the City route
be in a position to require that the adverse affects of high
density be aeel4orated through the application of specific
mandatory findings.
Staff will need specific direction as to whither this ayprosc:h is
appropriate for and
considered if revision so, . which land use c- tegorlas are to be
-^•
. ..... %.n3mng an Overall decrease to denafty world
reassass the density doslppnations for all vacant resldtntltl
mot yet approved for daeeldpment. This would Involve
Y -sfte review of upper density designations in various
cans. The attached Exhlbit -a- indicates all such land
e the planned rre nlef -e ..._._.._ - -. -- .
W-11. City "The 'CoC'myelssfon'maauy wish of yet consider o
isder in
of soar of these site - specific areas to lower density da
Staff will need specific direction on this policy option
tton C - COabinatton of A and t Above
e uct on n ens ty ca egor as a_d site - specific locations)
This would involve an assesseent of both iatd use utagory
dectgmt /ons and site- ss",Cific locatlons, as described above. This
Option has the potr+tlal cf reducing overall densities
S rithont -jr changes in either the text and
provisions of the pevelope..,"t Colt, or wholesale site- spaciTIC
designation changes.
r
C
�•
1.. -'f I`����`c.Cyq�.
iii
• .
� -
yl.�h.
r
C
�•
A
PLAR1ING COMNISSIC' TAFF REPORT c
CAC land Use Re�.dattons
May 8 1985
Page i
Staff will need direction as to the feasibility of this policy
option.
The final Polley alternative for :onafdtruten is no change. The
Cacraission my select WS alternative if it feels the City's
Central Plan and Oavelopmt Code are welt balanced and that no
substantial changes are warranted.
V. RECONiSHOATIONS: At this point, staff needs policy direction
or,y— . "two icy ailernativos and optia:s available an noted below.
fiitametfve 1: IIN a4sssity per CAC recareedattons.'
Alternative Y: Meet density throuIh:
djo—on F— Reduction in specific land u•.e categories only; or
option C: BCtibinntlonnofiAeisI tine .areas only; or
Alternative Y: No charge recommended
It is respectfully requested that the Coeaisslon provide staff with
specific policy direction to be forwardei to the City Council.
w�ia�i�w «rw.r..;.w�r'.«w*+:+�.:+� .�w.rv.....w� .. «�a.ri• r
'— CI'a 1 wr RA C:io cccaatoxcA ,
MEMORANDUM �
Lpril to, 1995 }
Tog
Mayor and ttcabcrs of City Covaoll
nwi
Adaisory Csmisaiea Members
lTr
lobert a. Rizzo 00
Aasiatant to csty thmpr
l7l=3
10r.1 pas R000mmAtums by adtitiory Coimalssica
tha A
that %141,172 Caassla at its hrh 28, 1904 Meeting recommended 19WLg
inrormetlm be forvsrded to tbs City Council
and Ylsmsiag Comission for oocstdsntion.
The Advisory Caaiss:.oa rinds end - "Wnende as rollogr
This City has 1ar6 deairad to mintasa a nrnl "VLVC=Mt to
the SUIMM aataat feasible.
This City !as allovad tba Construction or large isounts of
blab denalty dv*Uiup during the past t%.o years.
There are Y4T Cora high density dvelling projsota spyrovad or
auai:ipg approval.
Too sup. hto deaslty dss l M "190" are i+naasistent With
the Wishes of the citizens of tus City, `atertorate our
resources and pr'odum serious ccssequaeess or cmut;sg.
Swift and oartain 11 to we be plscod on tba pmUfaration
or high density &eulos projecco.
Tbererore, it is hereby
RL40LTO that tbs Advisory Caeaisalon rOcOmeMs to the City
Council and ruining Cowdeairn that the aaanl plan and
g u'dLeaaoes of tbis City be am'bdW eap
to WOO a ch
tzonino allouabls density naps along the relloWiag gcidsliaur
Ceatlnued....
4
e
C
I
April to, KCS 2 Lend 030 Oeoa =eadattona
mwt SIZE SIZE
=1M aw PROPOSED
TL so etan4e no sham
1 0chuga VA cha4p
W
H 0-14 7_9
!H 14-24 00.13
4 24-30 14-10
E 19 or M" COP
OtSOLTEO rarther that gar j&""aco tics amates in the
teraral aed 9100144 pla4s abmld be gdjratal by 4Vgaerotal acd
iaduntriai *MCC".
RMLM turtba• that the oate4on. .p, rap""Ats Iate4ee
de"lopmot, that it t* paaitted an 0o tae tbas 1/10 of if
of she residentisUr eased load sad that It be Castro" by
oomldttoeai vas amt staadutla eat03 desrot asaltaq%lea of
011 effects of blo downy to a dopes that thy "V* as
amter lapat an the roecwroas sad adrase affects of
OrO"UC tb= %Vail Me dWoUin4 unit to the cote.
Zr 7'001 ban &W puectlg= ar 0oaaa•ea repudi4 tttia aaet0r,
pans feel Rae to aettaat n.
g4tnh
yy rlVM.uaL.,/!�(. t,Y i.31.1Mn v .J,i ti..i Iw n�l.Y.�,M. .ice
NPI
rf 1. _ in
I •�
•� +.ww. l ry'jL.0 r n
1•
I
W
C
' a. I�� '�
Ir�L rTTj � Y �iL ;7.
ttna Mr•
w/
t •�
I
fr�„
��
:� -�•1 • •�• Y
y �-�
LL
ill
rA
./ + ri
.�r%�`ilj!l��
�r�'•r..••�r 41'x! .�.J
••�'^'� I
4LU "
w
�• ' � -1 . � ...
tai%' j1 r
�w*wa
r
......,
:s ,
EXHIBIT ITS
A
t.
lf.
� f
of rth
- ••vvareo s m n "u�-� +vuG.° - A re4ues; to all
Agri f+dlfty m the rorth sAro covers to �3treductfon f
r� RartA 13� lndustrtal Park d�dj of 4th QeStreet
east of Turner Aven
Rick a If6S °feting.) gnalfen . APM 210- J71.03. (Contleua,
�vnet City Planner, +nnmwceJ that these Items +DDispnt.
ems had beer withdrawn by the
6y consensus, the Com+lstion accepted Withdrawal of the applfcatsons.
lf1, gU r-SS,
- - —It east of rureaI; Avenues utstric
Rick SMIZ. City P1 APN 210
Env of this yftes �r'a A�Af East the +DDlfcant trarested
Envlrory�yital Assessrent and oevel...t Rether therefore, fr 4�d' CG CGMIssfoj
w• tonsensus, the CMilsfom removed the it ee frra the tho Agenda.
+t A l+tar data.
• ► • f
o' ffsubmlttal
0 EntUt�S "" R� TS
0. L:.aU USE MALySIS
Jtto Krouttl, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff rf7crt.
Chairman Stout Irvfted public cove 'nt.
Nfchael pa yee. expressed
indu :try Association (erA)`N; s grtb then DroLatal
BI�AgmWld considerr iitfg fonafssfon +xWidf! land use beh If sf the duildfng
land use reductions. gatfon cause serious
r Ants such as those
Protodures Shat►q the City tpprov"° the Dropostd
C►lanning Comefsswe minutes
•N
C
Adyftoryr iEal" Phfl'lfps Nay, Daneho
,actors Cfiy dpas°dat: ens NNQ insult staid
nce to thane who wprkN lit tot
Protlm w,tjtt pcities t southern Calt%rnl,,. F t onr of In
but to recaoeerd trYfng to Further t the f/ nest hrya
Pleating, Public g4 to etty -N1de yp fnt°epatlbilltY the didn't have a
needs to sttrM !y thzlrga And research v cub is which took in a ehr °Mn area,
Plans and epnsi sa asurd• Pte advised that tYeir of
Jig he lify dtr ha age on a Casey Sed th bass.
Of the Mlifle�ePl �I^Yrnu� urged P',,,,ad t"4 use reductions behalf
ChafrIm Stout felt U aAA�rov. of th on b
the cart before the at =e Citizens �rtSar no Change alternat!ra,
Should sfa take tea' �.retfw'rsdeat Ce�tl7 it3t ,3r asfcall g
art out and start the D'ICl could not Y putttn
Itartfcular sites in eti over, t„ stated that other planning ae that tY.o Ctty
tfr,Ughout the Rntir.iC City on a :tse -by could agree wtupa�tsi throw
Ct ='r conpern City would bz t 4 yronge MMI' but 1dons 1 at
fast of the hngardfng the hlgb dmslty rot es aAnroac9, rdwith dons :ies
re°tlnln Y sftet a • Ccroslesion stout Ponse to the
raise denatti es. Cr that it ra alrea bufit -put and t •iris d thtt
City Council th lie adrfsed thst his Assn the Pcllcy of this Cra ver
e taPretion of Prafaanca coal tip
re b tase.bY -ease buts. and fop ternatlyY M1N wad�rI to reC� �'nV to the
regarding which areas are to he forth
th3 fa'noil tQ adr!;e the ��isstnn
�lssloner er s :udied,
Code would bsRaefWire2asvlsed that not only lk slate) t'at ha•wouldn'tjyv"'d the SPecl /teCAlarniaral Ptah and DAvel
�, but dtoa't think the Cit Drablera with lookf and PI and o0ment
the CItY To•,ked at the pr.4, Y needed to rag at a site WC�nitfos, i pla be Preud. therefore, that lhtr s., of the co�rnt Y du ng f ' Fu her Coxs
' raferyr wa7tJ a that
et' mw S of ,hick the City and adoption of liens can ConalSafoner rrenssnd the no change siternstfvd,
spends a lot �of1lalStntad that sites o.Id ;
falling Into Consideration en A 31t a� si° e b MW d�elo °nta6 t bCfu d a r
falling in o th aug - Anent agree Itr
sisilar to that of uaa 19tladGhigh de•+lit� r�apPfefer$ that all meant )one
faalssle 'eet Currie pr "'gas De considered H g &✓inner
was either a ikglal stated that Ills !Hier r
concern was & Kithathe or no change [e oreta:13" was that
the word • • the aleerna, rt
That being the case, he would aeductiell a further stated
Opt for the 'M Chia a It rna •rtcCnsfdaratfon.x
tnge alternstIVA.
Planning Co"ISSfon illnuttt
.9-
��7ta
MaY 0, 1905_11
ri
C
T
',111
�s Jin Marknan, C1ty Attorney, stated that he tndarsteed the 01A's canarn but
t�1Y ehang:y 4n land use denzltfs �,cnld not be vaa oiarnlght, but *d be
su 31et to advertised sublfe Mcrtngs before the lann!ng Coealsslon and city
Cain il. Additionally. that an,, chin9es eontieered b the City would be unde
the guidance of the Clty Attornay's o•)fice. Y
Chainean Stout advised staff that the decision of the C�tss4p, leaned to M
two C°missloncrs, himself and Curelisloner Chltfs, In support of the
altarpative to look at sites on a 0818 by -case bests, and two Caaatssfoners,
WNW Ind "*I, in support of the no change alternative.
Otto Rrouttl, Senior Planner, aErfsed the CoeolSSlo» that staff Mu1d convey
meeting. recasaendatlons o the City Council ii their Hey I5, 1905
a f f f •
P. AEYiEY OF
IAM TRAIL RE OiREMEHT3 FOR TIffATIVE TRACT 11112
Tan .i'i —nj pe�y low R sidinntiai Otslrt (less tArn ? d� /eel. l s�e°e
the +w • -.side of Haramta Avenue, south of Almond Street . ApR 201 011.5,
6, 25, Xo, 3S; and 35.
Dick Scott dP Woodland Pactfte stated concerns with
on this tent9svve tract by the Trills Cea Ittae. traits re4ulreeunts placed
Jig Harkr0, Cfty Attorney. advised that the Commission could listen to Mr.
Scott thsa3etarePmatters suhitct3tospublic hearing. M not a 91yen at this
Tentatls"Trtetfi29 20 eccieffs'On
tr�et1geo ys regarding trails
Ccaafasipn as A Public hearing.
.off*
ADJDURRlIEHT:
Motion,: Moved by Stout, se..caded by 11:9iv1, un xtil
rplrsly carried. t0 adjourn.
I0:0 s.n. •
planning by
sj,etned.
Ras eetfuliy submitted,
Oep ty ecretary .
Plamin..unmisslon Mir
utes -10.
May at 1965
( any 1yA,
'.'al. _ .�•_ •1�`lj�s - .n ....w. .. n.. .M1Ywn \4..... I.rkb.�..l���jj j1';�'L •I
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA(AJNCA
STAFF RE TORT
DATE: May 15, 1965
TO: Mayor and !testers of the City Counc:
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Otto Kr6ut11, Senter Planner
SUBJECT: L&MJSF, R£COte<EMDATlgN h' VMF CITIZENS ADVI,,OAV CNN'
Recently, the City Council retested the Jity's Planning Comelssfon to
develop policy recoe+oendations relative to the Citizens Advisory
Commission recommendations on General Plan densities. As you know, the
Citizens Advisory Commission recommended reamsfdaration of the
residential categories in the City's General Plan. In summary, the CAC
recommended that substantial across- the -board reductions iu General Plan
densities be considered.
The specific CAC recGawdations are noted below:
Land Use Cat ory f m lattn Prop�osed
-`a3— i%Ctasge
L 2-4 Ko Change
LM 4 -8 5-6
M 8 -14 7 -9
fel 14 -24 10 -13
11 24 -30 14-18
n addition, the Advisory Commission recommend., %bat for densities
above 19 units to the acre, the Cate9o:y of 41" *presenting intense
development) be created. This category would ba- twitted on no m Wo
thorn one -tenth of a percent (.1%) of the residdetlafly zoned land to the
Cikw aid would be controlled by a Conditional Use process. The reasons
for there racamwndations ant outlined in the CAC Resolution attached to
this repc: t. As perceived by the CAC, they are: (1) the desire to
maintain a rural .nvirontent in the City, (2) construction of large
amounts of high density projects in the past, (3) number of high density
projects already approved, and (4) too many such high danslty projects
are +namsista:t with the wishes of the residents of the City.
Staff provided the Planning Cosission with a report, tneludlng an
analysis of the implications of the proposed reductions (please see
attached staff report), As part of the revienm, the Planning Commission
considered the report, and several btsic policy alternatives. Again,
these alternatives are described in dithil in the attached Planning
Commission report. In summary, the alternatives dnich wore considered
by the :leaning Ceraisalon are noted belewi
C
C
CiTY COU:ICII STA --F RP MT
Lard Use Raca:aendalk s by the :AC +ti
Nay 15, 1985
Page 2
Alternative 1: Reduce density per CAC retamaendattons.
Allernattvu 2:, Redvte dcrsity through,
Lion A: Reduction in specific land use categories
only.
lion S: Reduction 'd site specific areas only; or
Lion C: Combivthw of A It It 14%ta.
Alternative 3: ib champ recomaerAmt to tiv: Ci:y's Gener,i
MAO.
}NG CDN!it5StfW DISCUSSION
I,@ co mission discussed thG :xtter at length, and reached the consensus
on a nwebar of time as noted below:
o The ity should respect its previous commitments relative to
approved doe lsdeveloipmente andenareuwbjects,t: Develorpment
Agreralent..
o The City's .entral Plan end Development r+de are the result of
many yetr, of comprehensive planning, public hearings, and
affort ty many individuals; residents, publac officials and the
private sector. Though soma DOW *cations 01i ht be
appropriate. lont Codeowould not besdeslrablb the General Plan erd
PLP—wj %% MISSION RECOIp4 MATIONS
Though t,e CommlWon reschod the conscnsus on the +tams above, there
was a split vote (in t<:e absen x: of one Commissioner) ds to the specific
recommendation to to forwal*j o the City 'ouneil. Consarvently, the
following is prePAlted for tour :4mvidera: eltz
We vatat for Alternative 3t No cheeps teconcieded. This would In
effect confirm ?ha validity of the City's current General Plan and
Jevelopwnt Code.
l.as vptu: for Alternative 2, option t: Rwluction of Density
thn'lh weslderation of site specifle areas only. This would
result ,n possl?:le reduction ir, densities through the reassessment
of specific dansity designations for all vacaat residential land
not yet 3rprovad or othtmtise eoeeited for drieloprwt. Part of
the enelysis would to a site -by -site revimt of Mar density
designations in site $Peoific areas In various locations.
N
C111f COUNCIL STAFF grgt
Land Use Rtcomr: is by the CAC
May 13, 1985
Page 3
RECON%ROMON
Staff is respectfullyy requesting specific Policy ofrection, either
confirming the Planning Ccaaission's position or selecting froe tin
othOI JIttrnatilidWailabla.
Attach mt: Planning C*mission Staff Repot
Exhibit '.Y - CAC Resuluti -a
Exhibit IS* - Vacant uaccawitted land subject to the
Derclr meet Cale.
•
•- '�y`i�'. `a°i: �r?!r!'ti`.w.'ve4:°r ^.� �.w w • =.v.� -. .....il.w .• ��:,
I
e
m
hSa •9
,
(fir.
4944
Jas► tat. Caoa.iill :Snleaaaat all "ler, .thee tNn wry ta> ra4ut" le•
"t' as N feceP ". w ww daft i 41919:
of at Yftltw ailrNltn 90488 up cbr
pletfti. 4e4 1197 wall tilt N ""It alts"'tea to f W ti pvlN •1'14
" e sutle t. i.► tr"r!e 4a
state is got let (" an eau NI,%r1' n
Area it het C"cities's "I. we tweet"VaiN Ya0 Joe Jatfte. ,
MILS: vahgl 17 Jett. rynnd'd toM 1. a.tecam scale t9 11s'.1 .,tar.lt.
/afss4.
w tot 11.47111 fn W f «nQ. 1 lit s
tarl"la"tttefnlfl3.0.
•Y91.9 '
M. attl 17 tt�aftwl, y';tiljii±if7• Wiw el Mla.t fiat.
M4tlad y W IlaelH twLLao
Y Wlttan
]U'YY'Mlt {wta as lane e". Itry 1eYi.' Y9 "Ar all 4/Ylalt• •'f.ticalK'a
tuff ryart ri's JNtt It, 4710
y t+astli, teu•r R"lat. entWt•,
'0491 01MU t 'Xi ate "ties fee /91114 1 • /1t. 'lict!'Wt eYtalt ee »I
D!e last, acamet N talfax". "Its lilt ass, It tx'la t "aft" "lo
use "Wood rywArd la 1.114 at ne
q3- f 14142' if a Nv.t�rr it
Mail, 141441 tut 4 4.aI'm Ou WNW
t ua etdtt0 r'o, "s um *1;&" '44".
j to dwelMlH.
j Nubtat S.... -.we tf W fu.
1 JA Scou. Wl1e'a o/ W Ye:Iwl Gnt4ala.
'
I Jeff tsafaaea. fill nilll/o tap.
ftwet fact. ttliNa L7se Iwpap•
I there Nlat " fauw antra" era W ►NIN. Corot crate cl"ct the Nnla
beryl" of W "tie ".
• Mf=s NawM y Ntult' 'n"Ict
' t)) Nit a direct alf to /wl►ra fee et citl a"til to N Ste" apatite
cat" It 13.14.
she ae 73-10 deari-
ita •"1"let t►ae la Naala/wt epos "ata. tt 4449 at Wet atl ryf't
uuw " {be twortal comust"
1 CM The edtleay CIme'Inl" a ltYwlect rye•
Nit to lam sly aoesl'l 0 steel dn14i".
?"read"e
aw "fetitw Nat
Lwt"n" Wt " lame CR Iooatl7 N/+sa aub Ibt l" antra walaast //
$'t
r
�aYa tY
i1�J71, {»tfatn t• y Ixa" twang at IN a y. Wee'e r q"nl. �•
•aaast
M. Jy1tD SRSIe aest�
tt/4IM1 pwct by Uhl.'1ee.d.d by *[tit to atteride W Pupwte tip '
4"asdM'tt N u• Joist /waa "holy, uWlat {t11",413
trite ftrsoN. ge t":
e "auatfl/ 3 f•
fee. a•
40- S
tF,
N(Nta tgr "wN abet w allele a.-t l C"IC "r, r"
Me tMGt. -H /9ae •.a adattl" of ¢
;yyy
Y
ti
{: 7,`�S=�Y�-tiw'I '�.'�7.':e, +fA e' - .e _' 1, ti,, ••t�l.{fC'1
�'}
t41ff'�nN 1J'A1l`'U�in�Y' KiY4,lN t•FJ: n...Miw1^� t+e+rc •• � -44 � " � •+•� • �
W ~ 17
t vl��'iJJ(/tyy°',.ud'
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCLONGA
STk, :�F REPORT
DATE- Adgust 21, 1985
10: Nmyor and Wabers of the City Council
FROM: Otto Kroutil, Smfor Planner
SUBJECT* CONSIOERATiON CF ;-ISSIBI. CONTROLS 04 MULTIPLE FAMILY
1. ABSTRACT• Cris report con:cins information requested by the City
�1 OR Possible aT ways to improve the City's Controls on
financing incentives, rroovth etna eeemt and presented include
the Gmertl Plan er Oevel 9 ista staff a requesting
to
direction :s to the alternatives �tte explored Standards. Sttf i. requesting
azplared ft.rLLYr.
Il, B AGRCM -' Omar the Caur a of the t several months, concerns
over the rapid growth of mltiPls fatly h ,sing, and Vtomts in
particular, have been noted by tee Crt, Co v,efl. On d'rforent
oeeasfons, members of the Coo-c-41 req" ed thst staff provide
lnformatfon dealing with the renar of aierWent unitz auil% and
Planned In and Calitderat oe of ctn Q9 lc" O Multiinaths Cbond ,
In addition, on May Is, 1985 the City Council reviewed
recommendations ll {ds relative reconserat as at overall General plan ensitie, as recommended
by the Citizens Advisory Cerasfsslon. The Planning Coemisslon
discussed the General Plan issue at Tmith. and recoirnded a.,ime•
.�W' cae Iana:ssion felt Such Aodfficatfons should be p- --- ---
a site -by -site review ,vW analysts of upper den icy deaignatased In
various areas of tEn Ciw.
Of
To dthesi nttets, acatlkr,ast ff was rtr usted City combitne thosi
rartaus Items into .e rare cosprwhenst a report, outltnirt7 the
possibtt alternatives the City has available to deal with the
question of multi - family housing to a Comprehensive fashion. Tim:
Purpose of this report is to present all these alternatives.
'i�� '3 ids! � .M t. ' -in,y. • . -;'l ,
. ��."
•-T.,
'. �7:
I�•w•Y M�I•MSMYY.Jj`Y.Yr +•�,rO• a iJ.JI 11�.. J • ..
til]'.�OS'Y� -'11'h .1 ♦. u..
.• 4r .• rte, ••(.y,y� r
W,_ ,+
- ff
v'R �,
r
C
F-1 .
CITY COUIUL STAR. :Poor
Multiple Fail] y oi lops4.,t
`u9 s2 21, 1985
ill. ALTCMMATIVES•
m
There are mccerous alternatiros available to dear with the rare,
roluae, and quality of multi- faeily housing in thri Ciiy. hosed on
the Council's request, the following are presented in itris reports
1. Financing ire.ntives/witi- ,'Cady bonds,
2. Controls ,u •Rte of 9r•o,4, /9rcwth muutgsrent;
3. Controls on development through ujgraded development
standards (including stniaxrs ;welling sizes;; end,
4. Reduction of donsttyy through rea.msideration of the
Gantral Plan in Spec- fied areas.
Each one of these attnrnstives is addressed in the following
sections of the rtport. In the interest of clarity, ;red to allow
comparisons Wong the Varims Mlternatives, each optis".s is
presumed in a separate section of its rer-ort. Addi:iueal
supporting inforution is attarhed in the fnne 3f an api"dix.
r_
w 1I
1,
r y
T Ewa
L'lT" COUNCIL STdrtt�f�-poaT
halt ' q Family Old- lopaent \
Pugu. A. Is$$
Pegg 3
Trwign it cannot be stated that the availability
oati of
construction C *inancf. mates Possiole ccnstruc,fon of
projects which could not otherwise be built, it is clear that
multi - family bands have had s substantial inducowt affaet on
the construction of such hajsfn9. It un only be assumed that
the aliminatica of multi - family borw construction financing
would he.a a s4bstantial 0.4arating effect at apartment growth, y
t
2. aClrtsaoe Reveew Bonds
Unlike the construction bonds desc•ibed ibove, Xortgaagqee 14venua
Bonds are UPW to lower emrtgage rates for irdtvidu 1 h
bbyyyyoorrs� In Rancho Cueasanga, 1•artgap• Ravens s "
us�ucetnfull ppreduminantt with single family projects.
However, severalyW tiPle family PmJects, built' &La sold as
condominium, are also a part of the program,
the adva"L" of this Program Is in the reduced mmrtgagg,ratws,
,rA comse4uentiy the reduced mw.thly mortgage payment.. for the
1Mtvidwal hen buyers, 7lW'•buildplr also beeefits in thgt
prolgcts with available below wrket rata fimagmg arcO"Ier Yt
to $molt amd an cwnse"tiy lwus risky to dewie*.-,
W Ww`t YNw+. t1l, ..1111.!1. - M .1 •.� w•... AlV•..•Y�'1
i�
ALiFAAATIYF A. Ftawtcl ImC..Ky'Ej%LTi.,'MILY g01O5:
Sabsida•_ -f gom sort. 1.6 local, federal and /or state, have
Played an important part in ch2 dgvalopment of multi- faally housing
.,fH•
in Rancho Cw+wmwrlgi Sim 1070. For the purposes of this
discussion, those subsidies den bu
classifltd u follows:
+
1. ltultl- FasAIY tAllitroctlfYlrl ton6t� .
This techni"a is used tw provide lower interest construction
lotus for the buildars of various multi•frily p- ojacts. The
reduced ieterast rate is passible through the issuance of tax
fra bonds. The City's iRvOIVmaent in
this procoss is through
the fsSUVKa of an indutemsat resolution which is nacusar7 for
the bonds to Obtain tax 'free status. To date, the City has
ppassed %;" tnduemaagt nrolutiOns Only to,* senior housing;
howvmr tlx+ County of San Nrnardino has passed iadoe mamt
resolutions for construction, +v
of othv multi- fam. projects in
Rancho Cucamonga under a cooperative mgreeant with the city,
'he lder'ss ability to build construction produccttdforilas.ngin turn, In under
state and federal requirmwnts, 20% of ehg units so flnanu;
Past be made available to people of low tat moderato income (in
" dollars,
this translates W :a annual household income
. of about 520,800 for : fwily of 4).
Trwign it cannot be stated that the availability
oati of
construction C *inancf. mates Possiole ccnstruc,fon of
projects which could not otherwise be built, it is clear that
multi - family bands have had s substantial inducowt affaet on
the construction of such hajsfn9. It un only be assumed that
the aliminatica of multi - family borw construction financing
would he.a a s4bstantial 0.4arating effect at apartment growth, y
t
2. aClrtsaoe Reveew Bonds
Unlike the construction bonds desc•ibed ibove, Xortgaagqee 14venua
Bonds are UPW to lower emrtgage rates for irdtvidu 1 h
bbyyyyoorrs� In Rancho Cueasanga, 1•artgap• Ravens s "
us�ucetnfull ppreduminantt with single family projects.
However, severalyW tiPle family PmJects, built' &La sold as
condominium, are also a part of the program,
the adva"L" of this Program Is in the reduced mmrtgagg,ratws,
,rA comse4uentiy the reduced mw.thly mortgage payment.. for the
1Mtvidwal hen buyers, 7lW'•buildplr also beeefits in thgt
prolgcts with available below wrket rata fimagmg arcO"Ier Yt
to $molt amd an cwnse"tiy lwus risky to dewie*.-,
W Ww`t YNw+. t1l, ..1111.!1. - M .1 •.� w•... AlV•..•Y�'1
C
C
CITY COMCIL STAFii 'Pont
Multiple Fm►tly Be Iopatnt
August
Page gust 21, 1985
This program aoplies to Ior• orohase units and and
predom4nantly to single family rev ences, a s Probably
outside the accpe of the Councils request. Modlflutlon o
this Prc }ram would also have a substantial effect ca future
single- family housing.
]. Senior ibusine Subsidies
Senior Housing has rat been an issue of concern in the past.
This discussion is only included to complete the picture.
The Cit. uses Its Senior Housing overlay District to
conjunctiron with Developm"t l{greemants as a toot to provide
adequate affordable housing for senior citizens. Atoo Senior
Overlay provisions allow the City t provide various fncentfvas
to builders of S"for projects, from financial Participation in
en yrojeet 1w'rovaWts. availability of bond financing, to
guarantees to keepsthe rental rateipai� below rket�levilalfor
a Speeiffed period of tier.
4. Other Subsidies
Other subsides include Section 8 financing and other state and
federal programs for lover income houslna. Host of these are
outside the City's jurisdiction and scope of direct control.
i" existing City policy 9 in limits the concentratfon of 'over
income housing to 20Y in any one project. In the future, the
C1ty will have an opPortunite t consent on location and
development of such projects.
+SUMMY: since 1978, 2110 muti•faafly units have been built Cr are
1132 (1.es9abomutt i54%) have waived t� sort of tspecfa11financing
tncentfres.
Thou h a cause and effect
established. it is apparent t
would not have been built wit
particular concern with the Ca
fatly rental hoasing, a ernfh
femtly eonstroetlwn bonds would
PA has recently bean eaten
1988 and fanding increased 1
available options Include:
l�n firmly relationship ttiawber of unt
out some sort of subsidy. If a
well is tits avatlablity of multl-
utfon of CauMCI, Valley an multi.
ad y stet life Of
January
$1.5 Billion statewide. The
A. Eiimfnatien of future witfpia
City; or •family bonds for use In the
B. Itsuance of Inducement Resolutions for eultt- feel ly bonds on a "
ver I tatted basis, i.e. far projects designed under tpaef /tnd
cr tar a or 'In nci lafar locations. Staff could prepare such
crlterta for Council's review Y aPproprfate.
CITY COUICIL STAFY 'FORT
ilultlple Family D&wlop=nt
August 21, 19115
Page 5
AITERMTIYE 3. CWT1lO1.S ON RATE OF GRGIrtf1
Consideration and ultimate adoption of a Growth KaMgatent
Ordinance would affect. the pace at which development is permitted i; ;.
to occur. However, growth management controls would pvrobably have
a very limited effect on the total ultimate buildcut of the
community.
Controls aw the rate of growth are limited by the Government Code
to rather specific conditions, and must be tied directly into the
City's inability to meet required public services or facilities -'
through the normal development recess. The attached moo by the
City Attorney (Appendix 1) explores the issue in greater detail;
however, the major points are summarized telow: _
1. M ordinance limiting the Camber of dwelling units to be
constructed in a given period must be based on findings that
the promotion of pitbiic health, safety and welfare necessitates
such growth caltroTs;
2. Such controls are necessary to meet specified public service or
facility needs (such as sewers, schools, etc.);
3. There is no authority for a Growth Hamgemont Ordinance which 0
does nothing more than create a balance between multi= amlly
red single family drillings; and
4. There mast be an overall public Infrastructure or public
service need the us es growth managwmt controls for all
housing, not just any one type in any given area.
According to the City Attorney's analysis, it is apparent that the
City would first need to demonstrate a significant problem with the
provision of services to all r Wdes,tial development including
single family. Only after establishing the City's inability to
provide adequate pub to servicai through the normal review proceso
could a formula be established in effect creating an allotment
among the various residential M-pts (i.e. single family,
spartzents, condominiums. etc.). Again, such an allotment would
need to reflect a tangible relationship between unit type and its
demand an specified public services.
tw summary, controls an the rate of growth are only possiblo under
a growth nano mint ordinance affecting in some way all residential
development in the City. Given the effect on ifngls family
housing this alternative does not appear to be the most
appropriate tool to deal with the issue of multi -feetly housing.
Vol �eN
CITY CO07CiL STAFr -POIT
Multiple Family 0� „lOpment
August 21, INS
9< 6
ALTEAMATIYE C. CtNiMMS ON oEYpppp T
_- nom+ u"�A6ta I�trx
' Ilpgradln
Projectsgcould sfftcct the e7opment Standards for multiple fallly
levels, depending on the Paces � he ultimate bulld4ut
This section provides M Outline of rrJlsfons to the DevaTnpeent
Standards which could be conslderetl. Topics the include:
sepiretl n, recreation 1 ef�e�K pa;o requlreeents, byll�ding
ufldfemaits and building code provisions With uce�tloaParki�
! building code, all of the sections
Code. Stellar ANWNMants could be pertain to orN Oevela9 ent
Specific Plan and thw Terra Cool and Victoria Planned the Etlwanda
wfthfn the lialtatfon set forth ty Prevfows agraima is. nleras,
DeeIllna Unit Sizes Mu?if ole Faatiw:
A sample survey of nearly 2,000 multi. fan11
constructed and available for root was conducted its recently
± elx AS indicated range h dwliw?, unit sizes, average three,, Wj tint
C the following table.
NEW KX.TI- FAMILY MIS 6CR AEMi
MIT SiZE Me MIX
St!
LI-9dne
No. of OU's
(1917 Total) 660 1093 112
% of Total Units K
[i.e. unit nix) M g
Size Range 475 -S0/ 590 -790
sq! -ft. sq. ft Sq. ft. Sq. Sq. ft. sv. ft.
Average Size 493 670
sq. ft. sq, ••. 883 /t. s176
q 1t.
foal ly unpIS.t Code does not establish a sfnlnmu size for
fanny welts. Therofora, considering the information multi-
unit unl! sizes could be established, possibly based onWthe
a C number of bedroom, 1f Wroprfate.
A
CiTY Cot!•ICIL STAFF- -PORT
Multiple Family Dk,.Iopnmt
P 9 st 21, WS
Oielliro Onit Stzas /Single Family
A related it" requested for Council consideration is minimum sizes
for sicple family hoar$. ThTh_mgh this ?tae does not directly relate
to t'» Issue of multiple fdelly housing, it could be considered in
ceefuactton with size ltmitatlen$ on multiple family units should
W Council so desire.
The Development Code currently has a goo square foot minimum
standard, unless a CUP is approved for smaller units. A survey of
unit sizes approved by the City in the three single family
districts (VL, L, LN) indicated the following typical ranges:
LM District t 900 -1600 iq. ft.
YL Distric District * 1200-1M sq. 1000 sq.ft. if up
An eaception to this is the smallest pass of Victoria, with some
760 square foot homes built prior to the adoption of the goo square
feat minimum standard.
The results of a Rhona survey of the minas of Chino, Irvine,
Fontana, Montclair, Ontario and Upland are attached in Appendix
C. Controls On minima dwelling unit size vary based an local
conditions +cad policy,. they vary from rather restrictive (Upland),
to no standards at all (Irvine, Chino). Though it has no minimum
standards currently fn affect, Chino is now considering mlniew
dwelling unit standards.
Mew standards for minima unit size could be established with
Council's direction, either for all residential types, or for
multiple family units enly.
Open Spun M--aeiresents
The Development Coda currently requires 30% common open specs for
multi -family projects under the taste Development Standards, and
35% common open apace for multi -family projects pp roved under the
rpsquiiraementS (Patios or baiconies)Irangallr 150 space
ground floor units and st t0 150 square feat for upper story
units, depending on the district.
Increasing the open space requirements could be considered.
Additions? arse for pen space amenities would also be provided.
The result would be a proportional reduction of parking and
building areas, thecretically resulting in reduced density. In
practice, increased open space requirements would also encourage
larger, M -Ser and ears massi4s buildings such as *stacked flats"
versus townhellsa style development or for more efficient use of
land.
• "TY COUNCIL STAF '�
lfultiPle Famt1Z O POgi
lPORT
August 21, 1982 {
Page a
C and R�9ardfng Prfvatt open space.thittturr unld 1q
+4fusted.
Particularly for be noted ent stuidardsfarQ
Wstalrs units.
W'fidin It station 9ererous,
The
0pqq SetGaeks
atablis sal Development
Projects. eo eclnia" building of the Development Code
to side ., ings alnd Standards - dgyfret35rfly�se101, oulti- anvil
to fro-it. feet s4paratfon far
bulidings fecfag front side
A ninleuo standard for bufidfng seoaratfon 6ssad nn
the structure Could be established /or thk
Standards, the Might of
Optional OevalopWt
only �ffeett of of tMalil and ene �1E1 -fseSl
wfthfn 100 _
the Interior 1ti Ofstr its. '-fa
Ooundarfes o. a Provision
S standard could ProJxt.
story units t along street fronts2ci tic facing equtre Uee-
• however would also r
C
City. oro++iernot wren id rAT, J by tod�Y single family
City,
Y Projects f"rOved by the
pecratfonat Aeenitlet
Under the Optional Oavcl
Me aspiciff:stitutr���na Poaldor a tot lot and open yard
facfi Nils. exist fa tennis court and
required,
the number Mcreatfon
A ratio be estabiished 1
aeenftles b+sed 0 the
and hathin facilities of Units within ithin argyDor of
and handJall courts °Ir lneludo a Pool, spa. within Project.
Open yard area with sint�ldl• reerHtg tennis ' volleybail,
the burden facilities within all Ons. This roQe• •ot lot
the burden on City multf -fwll would cstu" cdequtta
of Projects built. fac111tfos and also tfrect G eroJeets tixl wduce
Oesfgn 0 -t=
gUANY and types
family eeYUilt ens Code Includes x�etatlons forit�trre of aa�itl-
haever, are The design
_ eost Comm generally less than for Condominium t st- uetures,
one -level unit type of +aartaegi archfte ^Curt 1s staekrl flats'
Plated aver ftkntfeal
are less +Ppislin itround floor (f• The
normally ,0* two-stor Units ri anhlteeturally that units). These
the use, stociated wit ntrsAfo unit tf- 0 -31de , i�h017M'41 -style
though thfs is rot always
CITY COU7CIL STA;Fr MAT
Multiple Family .lopment
Angust 21, 1985
P4ge 9
C
Design requirammts could De establfsheo which discourage stacked
flats unless dell 9"'i to high quality standards with significant
variation of rnof halght, fcra, and architectural planes,
Oark t_ng�
Ikvelopcent Code Separatay apartaants and tanhousa /condo
parkt. rargin ally l The n shown of parking spaces for apartment
w�llt is marginally lower as shaven on the chart below:
CItf W PARKING REQUIREMENTS
SPACES PER MIT
ertments
Tamhouss /COnQots
Studio 1.3 1.3
1 84drann 1.3 1.5
2 Bedroom 1.6 1.8
3 Bedroom 1.7 2.0
4 Bedroom 1.9 2.0
Visitor 1.0 per 4 0U -s 1.0 per 4 DU's
The parking reirilromts for apartments could be adjusted. If
condos, this dwouid w^timtnatrtical site that Of planning L f,t or
apartments, depanding go the unit mix.
Currently, one covered space In a garage or ca ort 1s rpufred for
411 multi-1`8011Y Projects. This stan a cou be changed to
t1du9ra garages for townhouses /condos and/or apartments.
Building Code Provlsf_ns
The Wfors Buttdfng Code his separate requirements for attached
dwellings only if units are separated by actual rt lines.
Attached units euy be plated side by side (town pees or one a g6—VA.
the other (stacked). To mean individual ownership of units
(versus apartmU) Attached units ay be separated by Property
tines or air space . given the side by side configuration of
townhoses, property lines CAM be located between units. Units
separated Ey prcperty lines have stringent building code
requtrasents for fire walls, and separate services, such fr sewer,
crater, gas and upgraded electrlcel capacity.
Y�f.SgY .a1Y M. r I.4MVI .r. .• ♦. +WN , r�\i ,.. � •'`. •• `•
'C
CIil COOCIL STAFr 'pOgT
Mutlaple Family 0 .lopzAnt
9ages1021, 1985
different floors, soa afar ti ,7acaa ispusoedrtoo dtnidc cowwnership. Thee
Building the standards are Identical whhetherlor not
units are sold individually as condos or anted as apartments.
basalState 1eglslatlon limits local amyidsentt to the Building Code
i- tatlonal criteria sucph as ciisgte, geology, and the
reseirehhrouCode, pgraddiingsMY Building Code requirements, a legs al
aaoepl tshed.
SIMLtRY• Of all the DevelepmelIt Standard revisions noted the
70-l1gwfn9 appear to be the nest feasible:
1. Consideration of mini"I dwelling unit size, by number of
bedrom.
2. One -story building height limits an multiple family pro teels
along Watt frontages facing single fMily /one story housing.
3. LpgradW design requirements for 'stacked flats•.
Ct, Modification in apartment parking requirements.
I
CITY COMM STAtrtPOtT
►Lltiple Faally DDdd Sopaent
August 21, 1985
Page 11
ALTUMMIE D. 11
fiE01 null Dr DEIKiTV TMODW = KTO TIM or
keductions of densit in specified areas is an slternativp which
would davelopml i t. Sucb reuxtions� way also have anefi,eclttion th4arate
of construction, through limited availnbiiity orl appropriately
designated land In specific areas.
This section provides a description 01' multi- family residential
6ropert in the Nedfuo. M and 1119h a 111gh Rtsic4ntfal
istrfc s. The Information 1s broken Awn into five pplarning areas
for Alta Lou. Coca "&, Etiwanda, Terra Vista and Victoria. The
Cary" Planned Cammnfty is not included as it contains no land
designated for owlti- family use. land
UThe tl atie areas. vacant tWbi
daignson inachof the five
Et Of km6ars nadd¢ten,aecond
o
account for previous Planning
Commission approval of multi - family Projects; the number of acre
` 1n ptrenthc:as and maps indicate vacant or developable multiple
family land not subject to prior final City approvals (f.e. Tract
Naps, Development Approvals).
The intent is to rovide the Council with information on vacant
land designated out not yet approved for multiple family
development.
.c
`+
C1TY COMIL STAF4r0AT
Multiple Family 6 p " .loimcnt
August 21, 1985
Page 12
je-
gi
VL
• =-� �� 1'L , u j $ r. w L �. 7 � l i •1 ��}I!1•(ija��Ly'9]`���.
t M w ••
L. Lies, PC T 1 at
167J�K, .I use k
I Hume
Yw ' K
i
i 11��• t Y9�
4j#
LAa nil=tl .t•" 'i' /, -- `i'lil t•sc�s'�. ':��
Alta Lon PTAmtnq Area
APPROMPATE VACANT AREAS OF
MULTI - FAMILY ZOno LARD
Vacant (Without Final City Approvals)
Medium (8 -14 du /ac) 120 78
Medium-1413h hTOTALOAdu/ac) du /ae) 1 0 0
It is taportant to note that a substanttrl portion of multi- family
property In Alta Lou was considered for possible land use thanes
during the 19th Street Corridor Study. As a result of the study,
I several sites along 19th Street wen reduced in density. The table
olraady reflects these reductions.
• J eMCITY iplFaIly s21, 194 a t70Ri
Pigs 13 Oa'tn
t
4�
Lr
=r' psi-• � �! . ; ? ' 1 %� i , 1 '�i. f �� j. � '
L 4 ! :. y� `i1' 7Jµ - •� i t' r ^�.•d (,�
Al .t"• • Pc W
c� y'a-
ac GC
AV Aft i
LY
Lap. IrI M 1.M
. 8.n
CLea•ee i Plmnin� f .
APPROXIMATE VACW
MULTI -F"Zty ZOREO LMOUF
kdfu (dg -14 du /�e VC&nt (Ufthout Final efty �bProvais)
kM9h (21 h (144'd°Aej 1,5
123
TOTAL ACRES 0 o a
1.r w l
I
C
C4
L
CITY COWtCIL STAFr 9OaT l
Multiple Family a lo;cent
August 21, 1935
OT 4.
Etiraeda Fla4eins Amt
APPRWIHATE VACANT ACRES OF
MMI I- FAMILY ZONED LARD
Vacant (Without Final City Approvals)
MedluP (5 -14 du/ac) 143 125
Medium-Hit (14 -24 du /ac) 0 0
High (25 -3f1 du/ac) 0 0
TOTAL A00143 (125)
The higghest denslty ppermitted' -in the Etixanda 4,,aeifie Dian is
Medlun Restdantisl {8 -14 du/ac).
s,
CITY COU'ICIL STAF// 'PORT /
multiple Fm!1y D!.- ImAent
August 21, 1455
Page 15
Terra Yfstk P1MLPI A►N
A;,- ?nXIMATE YACMT :.ORES OF
MULTI- :�--I4Y 7-'gEO LAND
Vacant (Without Final City Approvals)
Yadfu 4 -14 du /ac) 224 111
Medlin -h1yh (14 -24 du /ac) 65 65
Nigh (24 -30 dulac) 71 71
TOTAL AMES360 (252)
In Terra Vista, the Medlue Residential cateeggoory his a range of 4 to
14 units per are vertu: 8 to 14. Wfth the lower range, a
Significant portion of Ndfua Residential property has been approved
and/or constructed as single f4411y how,, however, the overall -
brlldout within the Planned CoMmunity rsssins the seen by building
at the higher and of the range within ■uitt -fatly protects.
N
A
C
CITY COO.CCIL STAFr i
/4ltiole Family D alopment
August 21, 1985
Page 16
Y i
rY .
A-11 -
. - 1" ism"
C
r..W
Y �
I)
Victoria /laMltM Area =
APPROXUOATE VACANT ACRES OF
MJLTI- FAMILY ZONED LAND
Vacant (Without Final City Approvals) 2SI (251)
Hadium liedltn-H1gh4(14-24 )du /ac) 125 125
Nigh (24 -30 du /ac) 52 52
TOTAL ACRES4T1 (428)
Development in the Victoria Planned Community has occurred in the
Low Residantial (2-4 du /ac) and Low - Medium Residential (4-8 du /ac)
categories. As of this date, no multi - family projects have received
approval.
c Includes approximately 73 acres not vithin Planned Corunity
Boundaries
-r
`< CITY COXICIL STAFr IPORT C
Hultlple Family M.9lopmmt
August 21, 1905
Page 17
1. .
The preceding infcMtlon focuses on multipls family dtsignated land
not yet comited to dmlalopewmlt through tentative nap or similar
approvals. It should be rated that in the Planned Ce munity areas,
i.e. Terra Vista and Victorts, the City has side previous
eomitments relative to ultimate level of development thrw9h
binding agrQ~ts. The City's ability to modify previously
approved land uses in the planned Camnity areas is severely
restricted. However, staff could re- ezaine existing H, iH, and H
land use dasi;actia:s in the Alta L'aea; Cucmcnga, and Etiwanda
areas if so directed by the City Council.
IV. Siast4tV F AYAS[A!SLE ALTERMATSYES: Esch of the alternatives
out Cr s report rem to a slightly different set of
problems and say be used individually or in cmijunction with other
snlotions. Though by as mans complete, the summary below is
intended to provide a format for discussion. Host of other options
can of courts be added if desired.
The options for consideration include the following:
A. romalirs city ;..11cy on multiple family financing cnrough:
1. Elimination of future multiple Roily bids; or
2. Limitation of such bonds to roecified circumstances; or
8. Consider a new grow' -+ aanagewsnt policy which may affect in
some way all residential development; or
C. Consider modification to eztstin9 development standards, with
possible foam on minimum dwelling sizes, park :cg v4 ottRr
provisions; or
D. Consider modifications to the Ltnd Use Element of the General
Plan in specified planning areas or City -wlde.
V.
Otto Krou
Srntor P n
gt:jr
AttaehaxnU
It is recommended that the Council review the
ted in this Wort and provide staff with
C
R
siY OF RANCHO CUCAMO17G•
°94 MM 6EYELOMENT 6E?E.
JUL 2 G 1985
z ilh1hU u,i sh3AS o
i
("Ayox0i,
r.aw. mss
e.L..Lwro..w elws•roe.
nn.. sw•..a
Mnopmrcu! TO: Jack Lam. Community 6vslopeent Director.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
[ROY! Jaocs L. Markman, City Attorney
DATEDL July 25, 1985
REs Criteria for imposition of growth ssenagemsent
control on housing in Rancho Cucamonga
This memorandum is in response to tho Council's
request for input on the possibility of controlling apartment
build -nits as ecoparad to single family build--outs through a
growth management ordinance. As a beginning point, the rather
C sparse statutory authority for a growth management ordinance
Is stated in California Government Coda Section 65863.6, a
copy of which is attached to this memorandum. The section
states that any crdinanrs :smiting the number of housing
units which may ass const.ructad annually must contain find-
ings as to the public health, safety and welfare items which
are promoted by the adoption of such an or".•inance which in
turn justifies reducing housing opportunities in the region
in question. One clear enamyle of such an ordinance which
has been adopted is found in Pacifica Corporation v. City of
Camarillo (1983), 149 Cal. App. 7 am attacs ng a
u copy of that case for your consideration. The came
really turns on procedural que.%ticns raised by a particular
developer who was denied a housing allotment during calendar
year 1982. The pertinence of the case to this memorandum ie
the fact th.: it describes one of the most comprehensive
growth management ordinances in the state and validates the
criteria for adopting the ordinance and the different criteria
to be considered by the city council within the ordinance in
making housing allotments.
The basis for limiting the number of residential
units which could be constructed in any one calendar year in
the Camarillo case was stated as a recital in the Orowtis Con-
trol Lads found in Footnote 2 an page 172 of the case.
C
at...a w.
...r...o aasu.
siY OF RANCHO CUCAMO17G•
°94 MM 6EYELOMENT 6E?E.
JUL 2 G 1985
z ilh1hU u,i sh3AS o
i
("Ayox0i,
r.aw. mss
e.L..Lwro..w elws•roe.
nn.. sw•..a
Mnopmrcu! TO: Jack Lam. Community 6vslopeent Director.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
[ROY! Jaocs L. Markman, City Attorney
DATEDL July 25, 1985
REs Criteria for imposition of growth ssenagemsent
control on housing in Rancho Cucamonga
This memorandum is in response to tho Council's
request for input on the possibility of controlling apartment
build -nits as ecoparad to single family build--outs through a
growth management ordinance. As a beginning point, the rather
C sparse statutory authority for a growth management ordinance
Is stated in California Government Coda Section 65863.6, a
copy of which is attached to this memorandum. The section
states that any crdinanrs :smiting the number of housing
units which may ass const.ructad annually must contain find-
ings as to the public health, safety and welfare items which
are promoted by the adoption of such an or".•inance which in
turn justifies reducing housing opportunities in the region
in question. One clear enamyle of such an ordinance which
has been adopted is found in Pacifica Corporation v. City of
Camarillo (1983), 149 Cal. App. 7 am attacs ng a
u copy of that case for your consideration. The came
really turns on procedural que.%ticns raised by a particular
developer who was denied a housing allotment during calendar
year 1982. The pertinence of the case to this memorandum ie
the fact th.: it describes one of the most comprehensive
growth management ordinances in the state and validates the
criteria for adopting the ordinance and the different criteria
to be considered by the city council within the ordinance in
making housing allotments.
The basis for limiting the number of residential
units which could be constructed in any one calendar year in
the Camarillo case was stated as a recital in the Orowtis Con-
trol Lads found in Footnote 2 an page 172 of the case.
C
C C
C
Memorandum to Jack Lam
July 25, 1985
Page 2
The rather crucial recital in question states As follows,
-it is the intent of the people of the city to
achieve a steady, rather than r tluctuatinq, overly
rapid, rate of resideutisi growth aach year in order
that the services provided by city, school, park,
utility and/or service agencies operating in the
city can be properly and effectively staged in a
canner
in order will
that nefie t overextend
and brought
up to required and nscassary standards while mini -
able costs of short-sighted facility xpawtiont.`id-
•
If you take into consideration the provisions of
Covernmart Code faction 65863.6 and the above- quoted recital
in the Camarillo ordinance, it becosss clear that a growth
management ordinance must be Coundad upon a need to sake
housing elloeations so as not to overtax public services and
public infrastructure facilities such as streets, water lines
and sewer lines. Accordingly, it is ay view that in consider-
ing whether to apply such a mechanism in Rancho Cucamonga in
order to balance apartment tuiid -outs with single family
dwelling build -outs, there mnrst be a factual basis for doing
so founded upon an inability to meet public service or
facility needs through normal development processes. 2nci-
dcntly, in that regard, we have found no authority for a
growth management ordinance which does nothing more than
create a balance between apartment build -outs and single
family dwelling build -outs. There must be an over -all public
infrastructure and /or public service need justifying the
growth management control ordinance as a whole.
if a situation exists in Rancho Cucamono jratify-
ing a growth management ordinance on the above - stated basis,
the Camarillo case again becomes useful as a source estab-
lish nq Fe specific criteria by which one developer's pro-
posal is M lanced against anot:herle to receive housing allot-
ments in a given year. Those criteria include the capacity
of the water system to serve tha rarticuler development --&'0-
posed, the capacity of the schools to absorb any iaoreass
in children generated by that development, the impact of the
particular development on the sewer system, the dire department,
C
C � •rt
'M d�99 Jack Lin
atine street gwtea ani any arterial hlglway net. yp store drainage
cts off & dri+elgeesnt. those critsrls analyas pctettial ntgattvm
In a ax't Other criteria to be LV;can into oa�stderation
architectural td*svlg oC °lino the 2urioo,y. oC the prqp,d
developeant, the grovtslon of with rlks tralls1 t9u,.=.clan
trslls and green belts ani virtually all other ecaUwti, a d
oospittbllity fSItUr". Rut twottantly, for the pm;om of this
Offrruf�d,�tial cwWaeeratast in 44" fsct that ee!
oonsidarod. I belle" that if we react that point in ITaa'•antlrg a
9ra+th ws"a t ocdinahos, the City 0='ctt could take Into
omsLientlan in "U'OtbV builiablt haain•J wits the typo of !nits to
W builtr :let !s. %Prather these unite pnseltuta aL�gla S of
dwell zm x the anal la !n
rav)"Inte, ri question as to each Y
C �t-xs the Flra,»eal could take into cOns"ratiot as oe of nusarom
fnebra rtaivL� 'a�r�+thllomtione, eta different types of hauL•h7
naela estSting in ,be ty &. those Wicq aro t•.e
graata, degree than oVars. •close, if there to a nerd � set le a
to a grey for J�a wYtt in aW abaat tht oaashity art�the e7ton
build-0_1t #%se, degree !han eparbmt units hhldi tee be ahead in * r
Possible that the CIZ nCil could deelds to allow
Pointe W sin.77ls Lazily dwvUkgs in !te ameldsratlon of all rala ant
imp armtlin; a � suet eautim tint in orJsr to reach that Pole t,.
the Ca mll xm%a a broad Policy drisi io@' tts'a first necessary an t�NtL•
effect hilts the hsa6er o! buil�uta
action !s mcsasery to be sups that lnt;-aft ctun r by 9�vatttnntal
nwle ry 1f rot. '!t ery.wel. be that the Cttcbxi4 aell -acids that
ehr to ounr lapl davloss avall►*1�, lAtwlw
to wt isbltc service ant intcoal. actors ntals� alrtedj. is able
bulldrouts. gaxratad b! }posing
I hraah '-1s` this Praha M, t.b attache! authorities nun
tuatul to eat in p.- avrtLPJ 07tiou far action ty the city Oouv:gtl an
Cris subject +uetIt.
JL•Lajk
C 9hc1.
,.
STAFF TELEPHUXE SURVEY, August 15, 1905
f
.,
CITY MINIMUM ONEI.LIN/ U1111T SiZES
CHINO No Standards , Possible new standards now being considered.
IRVINF. No Standards - Just u- -e OEC
FONTAt1A Owelling Unit Size lased on inning as Follows:
RR1 Miniesa Lot Size 7,200 sq. ft. - all R1 Saws
All Single Faintly Units
R -I-C 1,100 sq. ft.
R -1-0 1,200 so. ft.
R -1 -E 1,300 sq. ft.
R -14 1,400 sq. ft.
R_2 SW sq. ft. if single family detached
650 sq. ft. if mIti -Family
R_3 OSO aq. ft, if single family detached
SOO 19. ft. if WIti -fwily
MON .AIR' Niniacs Sizo lased on Dwelling Unit Type as Follows:
(a) Single Family Detached Units:
f2 bdrss - 1,300 sq: ft.
3 Was or more - 1,400 sq. ft.
(b) MLlti -Family Units (Apt. M1 Condo)
1 bdret 950 $4. ft.
2 Was 1.200 sq. ft.
f 3 b4m 1,400 sq • ft.
4 bdrms 1,450 sq. ft.
• Minimm Roar Size of 110 :q. ft.
• .01 dwalling units require 2-cer garage, no carports
ONTARIO No Standards
l
�C
•t. t
+...f ......ins....`..:,. :s�i....b.• �r.:r «......t..vr .r.,�• .. •.y...�vo.. -... ��1�'ll�.s-{rs�i�
m
�
UPLAO
Oraliing Wt Site Standards as Follows:
ZONE
M1R. AREA
MIN. 0 SIZE
W
Stn la Faall Zones
20,00
2,000
R -S -15
15,000
1,000
R -S -10
10,000
1,400
R -S -7.5
7,500
1.100
R -S -6
6,000
900
LM- Fam11r Zonv
R -M-4.4
30,000
1,000 /du
R-11 -5.6(0
30,000
1,000 /du
R -M -3.6
15,000
1,0.'q /du
R -M -2.0
16,000
1,000 /du
R- 11 -1.5
7,500
$00 - #wJ*Ior
700 - 1 6drn
600 - 2 'Urm
1,000 - 3 Bdrn
r
5 1a1
VDV—
sq. ft. for
MAro"
plus
200 sq. ft. for
additional Oadrow
M.
MMOME
'�tirri-.rr...s.w.� � °` � ar -. .. . i � t•�Y'�y!' N�1 r`'�
_ t
Sri- Cr. \ \'.� • .1�2- KS��.nrw.-r•+� � 'µ• w4..•.... • • . - • �.. r.• �c 'fe.;.Y�i. �..» ',L.
• d
° ciry msseatl ■latm
oss
sst It. itU
rose
110214111 owed y 1401509. s0941444 by gin to aryrws 4ntsllw Its. Wage.
0-253. r/ 43.104. "all" turlu o,0ols16ely fi.
M Items "balates
•...01
.a0taa
{A, JIq...w�•+. . ras.� I�cnw� rurzr ulr—_ - Wlw (] /!
Of V"tm •lnt gu wWiplo to goat"& the Fero. Vela an "ally at
,Militia flour ewelosaale is tY City. tuft 94"It y Ctt. 11eov911, grain
disease. (1140 -af ►raw COW
Earn Dakota oNe04 116 wtlld [n Fi1Le lama. A/a4solts Cs it wont
gar cots a►ssrrrd that to felt tM Cott of been is urre Visa .69
wt4 high ls50Usrae11 the arvral me area that y64 "old'" Settles. 6
weelt tN2 to an 0o» Ind with the kw.
;rye, hers. V149044 r441ew. 0r►res8" "Pont fa 900846410; the nest
04WO 44441114 a 016910 IMAIY boost to 1:0 04at0 emery 10 696904 that
aha! sere ►a1a11 "Imma vLab a11s aftertaste oents /lrtnlw as felt
that ht Iara64eld 910 4W at W been. 0001 harsduliy the Ma of its
home. Avoid Ml► massive sret 04 tat realists.
" Wisdom. Vlstaia madded, fining talent Above "Irma soh 64
"tag at ts69o. tmobar at vWcttss 09 City C"so sad 04110. server,
tallwo d seat Mellon to hlrevyo. an NLh me vet sestria to th,
eragwse.. life-attamastett 41tWU+a sit Is tto lath delttepo as vino
the beak use sr.e. 11160 ai "C" thi69a Ma bases"" 41 the coveter or
the Colgate• to tale eat a thrv. art to n twit break. tDa be
syss0tse tot stx Ccau to named.
abuse M7. T4 talk r64U64t. w►res ed that it tie squats lost69e of the
brvse ..a4 Lures&". it vases so s told war 41 !gamey tad 64latslelty
Propese 141502 do $aunty tha tutus w11Q are everei69 4 the
Vaginas virelse.
tar Mat1&a. L4rts 44rs, ea►en.W that s69rt416n two teas) Is tie ter
swAtT.
Cre4tL4 Inner. Viseais validate. grsu d cam Yoe eke s4ekitisto
4 Vest "i"
NMIe 11na, ragta:a re4L44R. plated ttse am bsela11 that the sI,,
roved be Ialnaa,e. the Rage Cale Se se. ,04 Oe g50ilty asset lartalt.
11 tar assets Lao a Debbie •tt°e M W yeop"Sy. tea that' site era set-
ter tan of I%. else nee Orly caret an b111►a slashed..
Joel Cm1ase. -M Cn►a4t116. "west" that the emerge necoat the ti -• y
age lamprey see CLU met was Asa leader to s" water that. is lws ten
C" sot otew.J Irma the Letter. `
Ralph Level aided Coastal an to are sto"arto a by► that rmesls.nme't
live is the Clay.
Or. Duets, uses that the CMU 24"" to be $Mod. r,d fait this eta+
am square tare s►ovld be aecan04 fa uy10 tasely. �'t5
♦ 2 Y45�
P
• p city C.sal ►arias
&aster 11. IM
tag# a
Je*as Irplf. glee. rnUW. UpFaateC tope .N. tN Gaup plan ..
wt w. It sea ►a1N tot Wq lot" solid tlw._ ,Its ors Mal. /apl
r.ta(a1tM e]ae
Unity amo14 ►m " ;wtaNt to Is& *goal Met a•
stns Mind of law. bet a oo rte.. t dGM Uat it .wle peso M. no
g/sllfis rings "ad Itmt ter a hqr at ballt,".
tae Ow on. Ins sme.e Lenin, detalaPes at tN el.* roar y.)., Toe
Moto a•t groan quiet that am then oM ell a it" M begat s amiss
nor As Fall co n fun ego ban salt! -Ramyt tae "jibes, ""Iss to
aim a go Y la,m. be emulates t•agtl met to sew ,wt to f
90 me etw►atlm is sour, and Inning thmsatw* to the &b,,,y to
seas as auk" darYS.
Join ylvutn stated ebot tuft niat dnalap.ra Van, the lab" nyryre to
be am bpete " will beat& Is as arpl. Y a.uwatm comet: Mt to
nulls %opt ton to *oat yfa.e a denlap
gtplw Wild. Willi" gym ce. left-first goals, at sue Stated ones Up .ors ranP1I be
s Isrerar. law b wt toil ctu esdemt23
edMsm sloe statute mite ddtnsem toe tww, but cast tin city-* cam.
al plan ►^ovid" lee • arms eaaelw eC allaesabte boosted. The Nat or
a o legally antnl Is tamp tan atp•I notation Islas, "d asprslea ►ro-
Jigs "taatm wFanees t►sa term 4001123 alt► pleased* gowth &u n. =
"idle it. no sett Jet rN &g ,, legislate •*tone. Ghat empress .het
hetMM la as arm it aut" going. to gaga* Cosa*nss to base actively
egged s bigger "1117 at I/[a ""able s *roof Project. heriafs tar
ml the am&@? of out"=$ I" fN uferPtse. !tabs *nor yutgate m
tbt rem&. also at a boea dear as legislate gaosap at 1111.
Jib po ist fall ce st ti*44 sst"ps pN elate tan.
Jet[ ketosis
eater efagll tat to a►aalw the General rem.
Tows bolas or again" pules gap~. ban stable eased& tM pals awrlas.
sew
carer Pilate called • rams at lgllt P... The nattiest reowesed of It pie
P.o with alt •when 4 W Coastal ►atom.
.Men
Qa.eilon glon lost non sate to • script wasp is Ue mltl•lutty dovelotanq
rad a" -;- to the Sawa a tolls el
" Wit /•(Maly !manages" bestol rep 1m g Pe,elmpo is battles a
dwatoPw sae tiuseles is order tla we eight asp tsplp dplalapsaats as
the atwos wle lung.
b. Q*wals w eN am m p.tY.trw[n e*saseno•tl set me as can seta
tb veritably aladlase to bring that pFa at pta.gtlls go tnitles,
a. Ceptnle M deeps wnoet tboatb uste&m g*Igc •- did Mt on tin `
a" s emit stem at the onllsl tetra tap us strips and tin best sal of
4tanles pan anger'* 04714#464 y CM P/tlnle rwsmto is atnas► wit
d. CmMliw of doublets did tat spot U erg apprgatsta.
Cessation split "fill
e. Illltl• /Wy tmtrectloo loafs be weld asks to set coaeetl tab a
let at P»J"" dm alb pose m W mltt•lmiy tomiag list as be cep
veawtiw la tin suits. Y awls lab le m the wItl- twAlLsent=#
r otrytet tw settle sin tat losses sat rats aslel•/frty ►foie. 2.=
+. t
Y
tyyt
[isf "mall at"'e.
I"... :1. in) -:
F", t
.►.t l[ cart 0 ";w i itPN ralr.a LW@ W Ito #gala basis. it
Celt t s ►on11 b al 011 tatUlt to Asks,* tat".
►. 4at"la N the ass. at gr0.lb/gt0.tt uneftraa It1 "t fast two
m of veh, this c4,U be Ime is a feasible v1..
a. Contents " aaloloymm Lumet ."redN Iesllte W.la tics saw11
M a/ralloo ea bit this *tau ha rgaw gal Ito lbating Csonleol0.
tr * two[aaon/e[lm w Was hat to oa [...al. a vaa14 :w to *to
all aparteaes to tie City cca.casom to cwontaim et"Iflatl"..
1. 4lnetton to f"ciff• colt 'his ebaell be do" ne a eltMygte ►a-
viY. This .10.11 set be a retention rtes@ we one no Lapattit 0er caa-
a.l Fiat caresses the alp" 44"ItT lent@ Po.lff wit. 4 "Wated
that a* tat at tha stW.ete Of into *s. alit stone the .ta"sm, fa
aHttaWS. % Colt at dtlnaa [Laos M ""go to batter bestial.
C0.rlbter vent rated at Agnelli
a. ,Mitt -AWII cmeacnatlto ►wev she a" in tha elledutton" the
W.atl"a In aNel -teediT holes, hot om gof bond tietnel" In mla
nulsoaa.
b. C0.tr.lo " the Vale at gt4, blumm samsomett tell olc ,m tie"
*Lan, she city /stmaff &#,law "aWt ors.
a. co"aie on /aalaarat ora.tb .rtraled gantlet, single frll7 W/nas
alt mho - "a to falls of set" 4 */lie at 1100 "nece feet. OPoe
mete f t.lrmot - flit We c" stringent 6118.1. till /l" let b"ks
me hop wts at$" strut female* 610.11 be a Port od as rnole,-
amus. y""reto msl/ le tvfs on cold"wea r•aodaeds. talking re,
e.lrseont0 - felt that we 414,14 1, revolving a-tom parking to all u0..
1• sod "en0. Ie Ismipl felt she lhaon l coaeltb@ caa11 net alinese
bo"t0. of the Iml.ver "camas. hot ghat a, athar "ma of Ile► a"
sip vbub on felt navels ha redwood "audit$ to tea gneasrmatime y
the levbeff coontal0..
Cmalira tev"t staged that be fall teat Coomlt Oal/ of blame
"Mct"aff. Itlneta[l "a %"if he stall" /a. has we b4, t4 bat Nth the
battle .lo . 1"lgel. haws N"@ s ►Imlag. We 14,, Imlevm she coastal
non. w At is loaar[ "t that a WSW orate on .l low. ,wane coal. *tan
vllb • t"l"l ..-Irma* fne a battle" atonality fa faun taus sm.aaeats-
t(me tam been limb one to felt council 04,14 war an. M tell that C0.atil
Iar, %0.o a ►ell, 0. 06 vignettes.
Gffar nbl@ stator that be Ile "a tot no soma/ a" swilkolea s and
tw r" stmt of no General nna at We Nub laralme war lip P. ht
to m 1,41 at o" as that ,lac, We have as tlebat f"g,Omat aueLa"r at
or tiff is the Costly of col someone W ,,,a a great Glelo toasgam t
nee. gin t4,ltlne lie ..ttafWlf ►w flaring to haon last.
COnq. owed of Mae. sauw ff $"me oat co ll tats o "t," W male
feelw " nth" hoal0.se. littt4, touted " folt0.tt
AM, sec "s. tale. its
.out ttyat. cool
.....e
1. .4,.e....
M. Gl11 A"M OF am, StLi'1'• tN tfol= 4r" msrssw ,
ti0illUTit71 t010O•W 10- (u
.i
a�
,