Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986/04/16 - Agenda Packet
G %CA,4 , MY OF c 7 RANCHO CMI AtDWA z �y L C31 AGENDA 1977 Lions Park Coununity Center 9161 Base Line goad Rancho Cucamonga, California All iteas Submitted fer the City Cwacil Agude anet be in vtitimg. Ike deadline for submitting [Yeas iteas is 9100 p.m, om tka Wdeaeday prior to the canting. Ife City Clark a Office racaives all suck item.. A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Rc'1 Calls Mikela _.. Boluat _, King Dahl _, and Wright _. C. Approval of Minutest February 19. 1966 ^ebruary 27, 1986 March S. 1986 March 20, 1986 April 2, 1986 April 7, 1906 A. Thursday. April 17. 1986 - 7130 p.a. - PARK DEVELOPM®i COMMISSION - Lions Park Coaaunity Center, 9161 Base Line Road. B. Wednesday. April 23, 1986 - no0 p.r.. - FLABRDIC COMMI96IO1 - Lions Park Coaaunity Cavtr. 9161 ease Line Road. City Council Meeting -2- April 16, 1986 C. Thursday, April 24, 1986 - 7:30 p.n. - ADVISORY COMMIPSIOR - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. D. Presentation of a Proclarrtion declaring the Btivanda High School Tall Flag Team as City Ambassadors for the 1986 Intornational Flag Team Competition in Tokyo, Japan. E. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May as Better Speech and Hearing Month. 3. � The following Consent Caleades itaats era a:pected to be routine sad ooa- ewtrwersial. They Will be acted apes by the Council at me tints without discussion. A. Approval of Warrants, H Tatar Ho's. 4 -36 -86 and Y� 1 Payroll eadicg 4 -3 -66 for the total amount of $581,015.50. 8. Approval to receive and file current Investment 7 Schedule an of 4 -7 -86. C. Receive Claim (CL 86 -17) against the City by Leon V. 16 Arcuri for automobile damage on Carneltan. k D. Receive Clain (CL86 -18) against the City by Vashburn 17 Agricultural Service for automobile accident at the railroad crossing of Hellman and Beaulieu. 6. Approval of Raimburcemeat Agreement (CO 86-40) for 19 v paving and frontage improvecants constructed by j Donnelly and Associates, Inc., in conjunction vitb k iaprovcmaets at their project at Church Street and j Turner Avenue (COP 82 -12). muds in the &"net of $49.681.65 to be drwo from the System Development P -nd. F P. Approval of execution of the Mortbto:m Phase IV 23 4 Contract documents (CO 36-41) and direct the Administrative Services Director to set aside $169.216.00 from HOD Participation and Cat Tax fade to fond project construction. C. Approval of Pro[easioeal Services Agreement (CO 86-42) 50 With Associated Engineers, to provide plans, apecificatioas mod tngioser'• estinate for the videalog i and improvemant of Hillside Road for an amount not to rtn exceed $11,950.00 plus 202 contingency. City Council Meeting 7'r H. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Imprcveneut Security for Tract 10827, -2, and -3, located between Hermosa and Haven Avenues, south of Nilson, submitted by Salon Industries. RESOLUTION 90. 86 -94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THg CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT E0. 10827, -2. AND -3 I. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The V!Ilinn Lr on Comoam — Tract Nos. 11934, 12044 12045 and 12046 loeated in the Victoria Planned co.ni tv. Accept — Madotgsseew Suede: (Street - Tr. 11934) $ 33.800.00 (street - It. 12044) $370,000.00 (Landscape - Is. 12014) $140,000.00 (street - Tr. 12045) $ 64,200.00 (Landscape - Tr. 12045) $ 50.000.00 (Street - Tr. 12046) $ 53.600.00 $flogs, — Faith Pprfermanee Bends: (Street - Tr. 11934) $338.000.00 (Street - Tr. 12044) $3,700.000.00 (Landscape - Tr. 12044) $1,400,000.00 (Street - Tr. 12045) $642,000.00 (Landscape - Ir. 12045) $500.000.00 (Street - Tr. 12046) $536.000.00 RESOLUTION 30. 66 -95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COr9CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCOO CUCAMONGA, CA.IPO ®IA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEWTS 702 TRACT NOS. 11934, 12044. 12045. 12046 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK J. Approval of Improvement Agreecant and Improvement Security for Tract 12801, located on the southeast Corner of Banyan and Carnelien, submitted by The Dear Creak Company. April 16, 1986 64 - 90 91 103 104 City Council Meeting -4- April 16, 1986 RESCLUTICg 80. 86 -96 112 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY C008CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 90. 12801 K. Approval of Inprovement Extension Agreement and 113 Improvement Security for Tract 12621, located on the mouth aide of Arrow, between Madrone and Baker, submitted by Richwood Development. RESOLUTION 00. 66 -97 116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRCVIPG IMPROVEMENT EITENSICR AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 80. 12621 L. Approval of a Pipeline Litre (CO 86-43) between the 117 1;X Southern Pacific Transpor tatlon Campacy and the City in connection with Tract go. 12!90, located east of Haven Avenue, acrth of Base Line Road; and, also, the approval of an agreement (CO 86-44) between Lewis Homes of California, the developer and the City. RESOLUIION 80. 86 -98 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TPE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYCOCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICENSE BETWEEN THE CITT AND THE SOUTUE13 PACIFIC TRANSPORTATIO COMPANY FOR THE IBSTALLATIUS OF STORK DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN TEE RAILROAD RICOT -OF -NAT M. Approval o! adjuatmant in emergency oo -callm 129 compensation and establishment of minimum hourly compensation for evening safety surveillance patrol for Maintenance Oervicau Personnel. S. Approval of acceptance of Carnalian Street 131 Eeautificatior. Project as complete and authorize the filing of s Notice of Completion for the work. RESOLUTION 80. 05 -99 133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PO1 CARNKLIAX STREET BRAUTIEICAIIOH PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING BY 1, NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Meeting -5- April 16, 1986 0. Approval of Maps Improvement Agreement and Improvement 134 Security for Patel Map 8680, located on the east side of Bounce, south of Base Line, submitted by M 6 S Residentiel Development, Inc. RESOLUTION 110. 86 -100 141 A RESOLUTION OF IHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 8680. ( TEITATIVH PARCEL MAP 8680). IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY P. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 142 Security for Parcel Map 7902, located on the east aide of Mayberry, south of Nilson, submitted by John and Rica Ling. RESOLUTION 30. 95 -101 149 A RESOLUTION OF IHE TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7902 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 7902). IMPROVEMENT ACREENENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY Q. Approval of Parcel Map 9537 located east of Vineyard 150 Ateaua, between Across Route and 9th Street, submitted by Evergreen Mortgage Corporation. RESOLUTION 00. 86 -102 152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9537 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9537) R. Approval of Professional Services Agreement (CO 86-45) 153 with Morse Consulting Croup for professional services relating to site evaluation, the preparation of a Preliminary Landscape Plan, and the landscape construction documents for the reconstruction of Victoria Park Lana. The contract aawuut is for $15,380 and will be funded by the Victoria Landscape Assessment District, Landscape Assessment District 14. S. Approval of Professional Services Agreement (CO 86-46) 156 with FORMA for the preparation of landscape phasing /priority plans and 4tb Street monumentation construction p1..42 for Archibald Avenue beautification. The contract amount is for $10,950 and will be funded from Beautification Funds. City Council Meeting -6- April 16, 1986 T. Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement and 182 Improvement Security for Tract 12704, located on the test side of Center, between Arrow Route and 26th Street, subnitted by Deer Creek Partners. RESOLUTION 110. 86 -103 184 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPR071NG IMPROVEMENT E17®SICH AGREEMI NY AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACY 12740 U. Approval of Lien agreement (CO 86-47) between Richard 185 0. Smith end Michelle L. Smith and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage imprm•amants at 6205 Archibald Avenue. RESOLUTION 30. b6 -104 193 A RESOLUTION OF THS IMT COUNCIL OF TOO CITY ?'x OF RANCHO CUCAMOQA, CUIYOMIIA, ACCEPTING A LINO AG3EQNLST FROM RICHARD D. OMITS AND MICHELLE L. SMITH AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLDRR TO SIGN SAME V. Approval of Lien Agreement (CO 8A-40 and Ereament Deed 194 between Gilbert Caballoo and Barbara Caballos and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage imprmrements at 6255 Archibald Avenue. RESOLUTION R0. 86 -105 204 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT DEED FROM GILDER• CEBALLOS AND HARDAR& CESALLOS AND AOYHORIZ33C THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEM TO SIGN THE DAME R. Approval of Lien Agreement (CO 86-49) between Alfred L. 205 Malone and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements at 6245 Archibald Avenue. RESOLUTION Bo. 86 -106 213 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A LILT AGREEMENT FROM ALFRED MAL033 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SANE City Council Meeting -7- April 16, 1986 Z. Approval of 'ublic Improvement aed Dedication Agreement 214 (CO 86-49) ..ud Easement Deed between Rodney S. Youag and Kathy L. Young and the City of gaucho Cucamonga for street frontage improvemetts at 9727 Lemon Avenue. RESOLUTION 30. 86 -107 223 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION AGREEMENI AND EASEMENT DEED PROM RODNEY S. YOUNG AND KATHY L. YOUNG AND IDTBORIZIBG THB WOR AND CITY CLERK TO SICU 71E SANE Y. Approval of Reimbursement Agreement (CO 66 -50) for 224 Improvement of Ramona Avenue in conjunction with Tract He. 12532 located between Victoria Street and Viva Street. Z Approval to advertise for for construction of -LM ?Hs trefic signals at the of loving locations: Arrow 228 Houle and Uellmaa Avenue; ILnoyard Avenue and 9th; Ease Line Hoed and Beryl Street; Haven Avenue and Church Street; Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue. The cost of the five traffic signals is utimated at $370,000 to be funded frog Gas Tax and Syntem Development Fees. RESOLUTION :10. 86 -108 229 A RESOLUTIOM OF THE UITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AMD SPECIFICATINNS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT EASE LINE /BIOYL; VIAEYARD /BIRTO; ABROH /RKLLMAB; RAVEM /CKORCB; HAVEN /LEMON, ID SAID CITY AND AOTHOISZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS AA. Approval of acquisition of video eVuipmeot for the 233 purpose of personnel training and public presentations in am amount not to exceed $1,150. BB. Approval to release Certificate of Deposit (Model Hose) 235 in the amount of $2500 for Lot 36 of Tract 12386 (8790 Enollwood). CC. Approval of Professional Services Agreement (CO 86 -51) 237 with Billdon Asaociatas for 85 P.D. update for fiscal year 1986/87 in the amount of $25.000. DD. Approval to adopt Resolution establishing Annual 250 Special Tax for Coaman.ty Futilities District 64 -1 (Day Creek) in the aevvat of $350 per acre. City Council Meeting -8- April 16, 1586 RESOLUTION NO. 66 -109 251 A RESOLUTION OF 293 CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT EE. Approval of acquisition of larger line capacity CPU for 254 approved Data Management System. 4, CMMCTL KURDS, A. CEMERAL PLAN REVISIONS - The Council will review a 255 memorandum directing the Planning Commission to examine specific slanders of the General Plan, particularly land use and circulation. B. cRAFFEY COLLEGE MOSAVI( (COs iLKAH BVgUET). 258 ` C. D11OSSICH OF POTENTIALLY ADJUSTING APARTMENT 260 DEpELDPMDNT S7M DAAD9 TO BE CONSISTENT VITH CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT STARDARD9 (COUNCILMAN DAM). S. AD�SIim POELIC Q11110E i A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION P_L= 324 ! YEAR 1986 -87 FIRAIL STATEMENT OP COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES - N Consideration of projects to be funded under the Federal Community Development Block Grant Program for rc the twelfth (1986 -87i program year. The City expects ri to have a total of approximately $340,000 in grant 4 funds. r RESOLUTION 90. 86 -110 326 r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE s FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES AND ( SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT i, PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1 80 ITEMS SUBMITTED City Council Keating -9- April 16. 1986 I. fITLJWjFn,s 2XAE amts A. UPDATE Or VECTOR CONTROT. ACTIVITIES - presentation of a 328 find report of Vector Control status In Rancbo Cucanouga. E. RECOMMENDATION FROM THE HIST02IC PR1SERVATlON 369 yp�E�p� RDeARDINC reE sT.Enle NDMESnAna. s• ^; �yEINTar sBgy,,. RZSOLOTIGN NO. 86 -111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE Cl'S OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. RECOGNIZING THE LIDIG HOMESTEAD AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOH.IA AND THEREFORE DZSD:EATIDG IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK C. ApponommT or A Sun or I COUNCIL FGd 370 4 J; a R .� SV 1 I I , I I Vauv a °�y.i�li esi Dale o °� a O P iaP JY�r.�pry N400VS Inn 01n a.�4 a�,;• I�Nti•.�r �P ro .01 > /ten TrI� TNnN DOO) I a 1 a i m zi�TJ> Piiz..zv�>z�..>Tn .r:..H > T} I I O ^Oa b ~��P��S�SPaF�m �y'nn �> n•�+N r•pl�n� Mr 1�e i1.lai >ti> Ol�O^ Tw T s1Y I�i�D�nT qa 'iOwy MP N =,nTa a °,wi nDwn E =fa T w s� a Ti N .°��O.Pi y uNI00 �O±�tlrOO�J Yq•IYw.r Nu YN4MUNUµ4N41 4 I Nme Y4� ry M'ti .1 P�PPPP jP1PPP ivam =+s i �l a Ss 0 m sm z O z c' I o' i ai I o ^yam € la o r•Ims- �:I:r Irt O O y>r°z o ' n a5 Z IS PAD TO ^TN�in V m Im I al n • a < PI M^ I In 4 I z ' a mITO P r a.: P �•PN JyPm V N•Y1�1 ~. N• r•M I+ H O VN OS N P S �oo• ov o 0 0 1 I I I I I I I ! I 9 J Y P T b P z T _ n D w a a y N p ° Cn i T Da a s s a „P^ Y .zi N e c'� I J IPN I P •q� ouuY1 WIP UN'OJ PMT O •qq•��P ?�I1OP Oa�OJ!7 V4IM JPMJ� bndeoopoq OOIPm .0000. I✓t000O.00 00 OOOp OG� III I I I I I I I I I i 1 di ivam =+s i �l a Ss 0 m sm z O z c' I o' i ai I o ^yam € la o r•Ims- �:I:r Irt O O y>r°z o ' n a5 Z IS PAD TO ^TN�in V m Im I al n • a < PI M^ I In 4 I z ' a mITO P r a.: P �•PN JyPm V N•Y1�1 ~. N• r•M I+ H O VN OS N P S �oo• ov o 0 0 1 I I I I I I I ! I 9 J Y P T b P z T _ n D w a a y N p ° Cn i T Da a s s a „P^ Y .zi N e c'� I JY I I x I I M.rn T NniO }Y }iryTwTw}{n�1`rOn ![[Prr �T r°'rr Mi: OiY.OTO!>S��LI °O > S +O 'da NN war n Mn an ora}•i n in 4=='... . �e z "Y.J�tEn < °an co n iaran ^r Ni o J «.=wf ly. I rzw i N Wjlii rin x « j I r.+I -.I :u +7rrrrr rrrr yN rr rrr..- Ir.•rl IV U VIY��V�WV VV, u,uuuWN NyY 1IY 44NY NNN .ry ^^ f•p�OOOy000a ddi ad aYNO> ° I Y Oa�P rPPaMNVOIYS PV N•JO aOrPM WN OaO..P JV I i I I I I .N°,•+ zO1TpO LIP a o000 I wa sl No n0w.I0 OooNie e aoVr i+ �OY•e II oo1L r iY� P g o ............. o.V P ♦IFPa P �Pp.O«O.I L,Pe^V°. ry e VO 00.•,00 OrOVOaI.1Y �d OOIIhn'100�0010.•0 I I i I I I I I I I l I I i I I I I I i 0 T P A p r O Y a y s n n T-1z a I A I e i Ip O IP Y Ia Y In ;y Y 1• P, Nn nn � n •i"..n I «« I n '.' m� �zS n�!• � .S.m �N'ra. �r .srr nz i n•i i z I a�ry. die T'A a sp '�aa a is i Ni A «.=wf ly. I rzw i N Wjlii rin x « j I r.+I -.I :u +7rrrrr rrrr yN rr rrr..- Ir.•rl IV U VIY��V�WV VV, u,uuuWN NyY 1IY 44NY NNN .ry ^^ f•p�OOOy000a ddi ad aYNO> ° I Y Oa�P rPPaMNVOIYS PV N•JO aOrPM WN OaO..P JV I i I I I I .N°,•+ zO1TpO LIP a o000 I wa sl No n0w.I0 OooNie e aoVr i+ �OY•e II oo1L r iY� P g o ............. o.V P ♦IFPa P �Pp.O«O.I L,Pe^V°. ry e VO 00.•,00 OrOVOaI.1Y �d OOIIhn'100�0010.•0 I I i I I I I I I I l I I i I I I I I i 0 T P A p r O Y a y s n n T-1z a I A I e i Ip O IP Y Ia Y In ;y Y 1• P, I ®l I ' uPPMN �PN )PYINpIJV W'4 N.1J• Y PrpVl �^ NOp Nr0 PP J4PVPN•.l Ne Ny M.IOOnNOVYd.'^ PO PM dw�1Y V',P dlY VOrNd Nw� �SVrN YMid YV OJM' �2 �nn ti1TTT n bODT00000 nr.n nn AnnI1 N�oa 0�sa°+..>:Y °°°moo >c.. «YYrrlrr csc Q000 e�n0 Am mz y<O j�Naln omcNNNn<c 1t MJ•nrn NEn rC�(�0 <zIE Es M 't > Sv.0 �nrff nwmr- r �Km >I »m.+uu 93' :nzl= �. r.. wmrw >ES� r3vrmlw Ya ii23a EO �CC 1N i r D AJw> y Er/y Nnn OOOw �I"�r°S' ONr�r m ONx xOm TN !� Y MTNnn• S $AI >6NIEbS'n Dew I yw �wmw GTrmro y� om «rmon'�K>I la «z > wrzn K�C �..TN niz «Y.P raW 9nninmm I i t mem o no 'a w� aa0 i n movNW� z � S.. "1T r. I°�a noilzo «zrszn n s�z me � i•r n I P eom ��c8 Y0T Ii iS e v I��Yr�°T,T. «I Im D' i•m ZTGP00 yy ((ff^ Twwr S n I OTrwtD t�Y O� I�mm >my AI 09 N2(Slm•O Oti � 1- r «e «C DO . w s c yj •o .I I T n •° E m z ,N wli w' I as bm <,saa�w IOAaae< a <aoln TIT-I nc� m %%ri,�T�.i nw. . . TAKr��'4ppAmmmT V�}im mtl � Nei. Ll�O CC per• ^C C rZ LOCDCI� >CO� Fw'� 5ic T DIi OOm�t.1�Ol O 10P�0 A O NOIAAOO mr Nw O >� 1 3 I O' iTl'�� rm�m9 Ar' OrE yNADwNWWWtTn 0MT IIIaTY T ^ml NT TTN K SM �±m P'�m� f ai E D 9Nirm yy��ppCS }m }Eyy .A > O N�yO OI i•.m} > OM,m 009 i y0 ilm ifs �9 ..s �.rOwW Est rm E 9 }m�rr1<OY Nhfn �f SNS 19 D„ W« nn y O nTNT���.w���.yyyyyyS Cw EI �� .I N� •n 4,QIasIT _ f I eN w I• I � Im NI 2I0 I n n n'mn nn n Ir. Nnnn In n 0 0 OInV Iss 0 I� �iee0�l 9 V IT a .s.�sz. ST E rs Im ^'.z.�i F m a Ia '� awa laa P a la ilaai: a al 71 l i Iw a M E zi z a s >is E i P!.P V VPw. O MM -O._O}.fVM N VO.� VI VN Vl VY YV . Y_°Y�ryM Vo V ^ M« -4n' -° ° N Y► -V�°.4 °°o 0010y0 o0 °o02ee o! Y02!0 co -- oeeoq PYVVY. ...YV - I JP y .V ! . �r we I I V4IJUV..V Vip 009pw Vd o + ITV ✓�YriO�u V.0 I NPgqnrdJPppOd NV yOgO ♦gqNYVwM dw rP OVOVO'p4Y � ooaoola Yi�f_o� w:�_oOloyolei ua°u� y��u Pe _�Pl:sps�i_q I I I I I , I I I I I I I Y f P im e P w w r i N O a 't 0 n c L O L T a n y Y I I ° � I ° .m I YOYJVJ "O MJY mm�lTi =' n >s %^ 900 a ,o • rGl Cr1, 5 S n!+".a nl y> T% i z ui � uiw r z vo�ofo JIV 4r 1 �"�iMJOrlO I 8Po5� , I I I j I I I ;r.aJ VNVJyyy Jf�.r �Ir Op a ONJ.TNN� 19 anoP aYJYNy PUOP V�.rP NJM1JVpF.p ip pY > n• ;y P IIJ[L S,O„ �j wT %LL azM ZLOS2 /� 1 O 1! �`�`�`� )CY >II[ 00� jOK n•C,a p fY> OC 1 P sQsa wn-1 •+ •Y'IYlzr' -m w °zva ��^ z • zrw x ,w•, nrr-�N ro,DY h r �1 >MSI 1 r rt >� ,vl Nlnu> S�2vo anm I » :n n iEQ�om sm ,>• � nvyft�•a >��zmN nay p ffFF { :�niin mf 3I !�`CAr�yrm =CD A� >yINn1 1 M •A.a�po "IZT•D� PT�O�> G'[l n•(o=O 9'Jlw_r 1 L I.b•Ii 1IV ..=-I n 11 8 Op1� n nSDm�1I1{r�.n•. 1'^y ^�.p•Nlns io , I r � T Sj N i j �'._. �.•,11^.•Yi >QQili,a sa nynn.".C�.>. •Dn�.a••ea�••Ta i°r•w i Ir•1�"y RzlJaa9zz•z••i•°x„y$rh�nn c1��.'aiz� -wc 1 R HIV 9�I�y T° C �SYm(1 '+ta '•»i �On°J� il.(.>i2 »m ay/•elya y0I0Dr a0 13 �m nN rO 132r'C N NI j JiT9 �u1!1nP 1 a rJ�yo {mmz9 1M0 a z{- -irNl „v .r av A�.=.1 cJ9 iiy mT , Ny °h» i 3y c "O A�ww ' R �N .1° N i i! 1aTw1wMry•g ' r°9• m y YI tiT1N n .•� 1 i y vy,rrv; T A y 1 T� mwSi°z I _ 1 r 1 a, aaws,T a' „ i3, i Ll li» juuYUY uluu Y'u �u ue.Y :% ri was aa,ep o•po �aoo•+ ..1��'uiae I e V 1 y.uu oaloy aw n•'IN.. aw �JJ Y» {nap aP Pp 1 z a '4I1I NI � N I I I i i 9 IN ~ ---0--- J�I 1 V T PP Oea {p ~OOOP IIIIMyO P {�1 �Ir 4•Iel•!JO JJ {peP pJ IT J Op OHIO •Ip000Jr OIY ISPO Y�OwIOPJ p0 �" i I I I I t- I I I Lam. i L S t _i _ _t_ t a� __ 1 1 1- I t t a a• 1� 7a _ t p Y .N n »1I»O T P.n Si 000�• n HM> rs�n ^s °• F qq I s�Il�6P_wl w�'1 sz s°ro >i aww' a8ygii es, LJJ� >I � N ' nn M KII wxix..II ^ i I w.r.GT a: U., I oeloo of TNN a�rN>x ps+zJ r �T y�as tlrT' v-. xv eo�>ozr n s�� �T.. �Yr +v og '•• mw�z'r.. nrtsam f� yN Nmr zcc Tz�i>I -�z.mo J now ir-+T� z'V a I`SS anl� ,v.$z wTV rlv � n J ov aY�a�0. Aar i. as i�owceo i.N. e.J.c o.z�Tl eTZ>. ns Ne wz ��o•r yr nnzl a faT>.4 szw a.rn I iT ^r.nivn y:T +�ui ry v.:^ vl�..s � NN S'21 n• \:N ^iYY~ NP;CN WSJ j%nr� i N T .••� a �in IGw2 In+n +n;nT nn xln ..^.Yln nn O T IYb a �eJ eo ly Wc; oo h I r !2 Y mT�Twxi I w 2 a �iaaa 1Laa a a as �O I 1 Iv 1 1< P P i r i N i .. a 1 L I P 1 � I N a A A I Ii♦ _i �.i�liiil�i '��i -i iili�i:i 'i1♦'�wi _ i� �] a i% �� Yyyy��� Y•a 11y1VVV NM \M � N.��1OOS 1 A PP VYr�.Y JIIM MONO yPp}�YY OPP JP ♦V O_1p J0 1 a �.0 w w u C.��I •. ppwl ♦M•py�r �Y quo �LL�"�"��we 1 MMVrOwr a�V aOLIO W±o .I: M:: OU. W > ~ol!��wllOY a�OMpl iy 1 u�Ygq'zo:•I! ew °'ll- po°eo• Peaua•Na oJmPP 0 1• o OP �P�aProo ..Co... O ro Paco V 000. O +cI 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I , I I I i I I 1 I I 15' .I I I I 1 I 1 1 � 1 I I I I � 1 1 I l i l l l 1 I I I I i I i I I I I I i I I 1 I •6 I I <y t P s T Tom_ 8 F F ; P a A s A R y P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16. 1986 TOt City Council and City Manager noms Jim part. Administrative Services Dirantor /Deputy City Treasurer SOBJECTt Receive and pile - City of Rancho Cocamoega Investment Schedule States Report as of April 7. 1986. MO-MAN u w, FURCHASB MATURITY INTERBBT IRSTITUTI,MI DAYS PAYS AMOUNT RATE Long Beach Savings 6 Loan 04 -10-85 04 -10 -86 100,000 0.07700 Bank of Beverly Bills 10 -18-85 04 -16 -06 1001000 0.08400 Great pastern Savings 12 -17 -85 04 -16 -86 800.000 0.07850 Crocker National Bank 03 -19-85 04 -18-86 500,000 0.06800 Croat Western Savings I1 -04 -85 05-07 -86 200,000 0.08150 Par West Savings 6 Loan 11 -04 -85 05 -03 -86 100.000 0.08500 American Diversified 11 -06 -85 05 -05 -86 100,000 0.09375 Foothill Independent Bank 04 -02 -86 05 -07 -86 674,986 0.06625 Wilshire Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 05 -09-86 100,000 0.08500 Manila Bank of Calif. 01 -71 -86 05 -12 -86 100,000 0.08250 7 Investment Status Report page 2 PORCBASB MATURITY INSTITUTION DAM . narR AMOn_ INTEREST PAIR MARKET tarn VALOR Omni Bank 05 -16 -85 05 -15-36 100,000 0.09500 Southwest Savings 6 Loan 05 -20 -05 05 -20 -56 500,000 0.10000 Brookside Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 05 -28-86 100,000 0.08625 Aastwood Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 05 -28-68 100,000 0.09700 Equitable Sniogs 6 Loam 01 -31 -86 06 -02 -86 100,000 0.08350 Sterling Sniogs 6 Loan 01 -29 -86 06 -06 -86 100,0W 0.08500 Ball Savings A Loan 02 -03 -86 06 -06 -86 100,000 0.08750 North American Savings 02 -03 -86 06 -09-86 100.000 0.08750 New American Savings 02 -03 -86 06 -09-56 100,000 0.08250 - Irviea City Soviets 6 Loan 02 -10 -86 06 -09 -56 100.000 0.08000 Fidelity raderal Savings 06 -17 -85 06 -1746 100.000 0.09250 Charter Savings 6 Loan 02 -12 -86 06 -20 -86 100,000 0.08350 United Bank 01 -29-86 06 -23 -86 100.000 0.08750 American Ccanarco National 02 -05-86 06 -23 -56 100,000 0.08375 Eaacutive Savings 6 Loan 02 -05-86 06 -23 -06 100,000 0.08250 Imperial Savings 09 -23 -83 06 -30 -86 100.000 0.08700 Imperial Savings 01 -06 -86 06 -30 -86 100.000 0.08000 National Back of Calif. 02 -10 -86 06 -30 -36 100.000 0.08500 Vineyard National Bank 12 -27 -85 07 -02 -86 100.000 0.00000 rootbill Independent Bank 01 -09 -86 07 -02 -86 100,000 0.07123 American Savings 6 Loan 06 -29-04 07 -07 -M 100.000 0.13200 Investment Savings 6 Loan 02 -12 -86 07 -07 -86 100,000 0.08250 American Savings 6 Loan 07 -09 -85 C7 -09 -86 100,000 0.09373 Beak of America 12 -30-85 07 -15-86 100.000 0.07275 3everl7 Rills Scvlugs 07 -13 -85 07 -15-86 100,000 0.09400 M is Livestmant Status Report Page 3 PORCRASR MATURITY INTEREST PAIR AAIRBY nAYR —RAM— AMOUNT _UII_ VALOR California Federal Savings 01 -13 -86 07 -16 -86 100,000 0.07900 Commercial Canter Bark 02 -12 -86 07 -18-06 100,000 0.08250 South Coast Thrift A Loan 02 -13 -86 07 -18-86 100,000 0.08250 First Commercial Bank 02 -12 -86 07 -21 -86 100,000 0.08500 Sierra Federal Savings 02 -12 -86 07 -21 -86 100,000 0.08300 Pioneer Savings A Loan 02 -13 -86 07 -21 -86 100.000 0.08550 Century Bank 02 -25-86 07 -28-86 400.000 0.08375 Atlas Savings A Loan 01 -31 -86 07 -00 -86 100,000 O.G9375 Foothill Independent Bank 01- 13- 8616 -86 300,000 0.07125 Inland Savings A Loan 02 -05.86 08 -11 -86 100,000 0.0000 Presidia Savings 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 08 -11 -86 100.000 0.08700 Plana S"Logs 6 Loan 02i6-86 08 -11 -86 100,000 0.08500 Bank of America 01 -14 -86 0B -20 -86 100,000 0.07575 Central Savings 02 -05 -86 08 -22 -g6 100,000 0.08750 Columbus Savings 02 -05-86 08 -22 -86 100.000 0.08750 Del Amo Savings 02 -10 -86 08 -25 -86 100,000 0.08375 Bentington Savings A Loan 02 -10 -06 08 -25 -86 100,000 0.08750 Downey savings 02 -25-SS 08 -25-86 600,000 0.07900 Glendale Federal 01 -27 -86 08 -25-86 100,000 0.08200 Guardian Savings 02 -19 -86 09 -05-86 100.000 0.08350 Guardian Savings 02 -19-86 09-05 -86 100,000 0.08350 First Security Savings Bank 02 -19-86 09 -05-86 100,000 0.08500 Footbill Independent Bank 03 -20 -86 09 -18-86 749.332 Treasury Bill *l Rousebold Bank 02 -21 -86 09 -19 -86 100,000 0.08650 Valley Federal Savings 02 -24 -86 09 -22 -86 300,000 0.08000 I Investment Status Report Page 4 PORCRASS NATURITT TOSTITUrion Data Data Bears Savlogs Back 03 -22 -85 09 -26 -86 Centennial Savings 4 Loan 02 -25-86 10-03 -86 "Piro National Bank 02 -23-86 10-03 -86 Farmers Savings 02 -25-86 10 -06 -86 Western Financial Savings 02 -26 -86 10 -06 -86 Signal Savings 01 -10 -86 30 -16 -86 Financial Savings 6 Loan 02 -19 -86 30 -17 -86 Weston Rrplre Savings 02 -25-86 10 -20 -86 Navport Balboa Savings 03 -03 -86 10 -20-85 Bask of Whittier 03 -04 -86 10 -21 -86 Pacific Savings Bank 10 -24 -85 10 -24 -86 Founders Savings 6 Loan 02 -27 -86 30 -27 -86 Pacific Savings Book 3 -06 -86 10 -31 -86 Century Thrift 03 -06 -86 11 -07 -86 San Clarence Savings 6 Loan 03 -07 -86 11 -07 -63 Progressive Savings 03 -07 -86 11 -10 -86 lack of Nevport 03 -14 -86 11 -14 -86 Gibraltar Savings 4 Loan 03 -17 -86 11 -17 -86 Pomona First Federal 03 -I1 -86 11 -19-86 First Federal Savings Bonk 03 -03 -86 11 -26 -86 Coemerce Savings 03 -11 -86 11 -26 -86 American Savings 11 -04 -85 12 -04 -86 United Nisrahi Bank 03 -19 -86 12 -01-86 California Federal 03 -19-86 12 -15-86 .&&noes Savings 6 Loan 03 -18-86 12 -15 -86 P ', Arroehead Pacific Savings 03-11 -86 12 -]] -86 /D 100,000 100,000 103,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,CG0 99,000 100,000 100,000 91.224 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 500,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 400.000 100,000 100,000 INTBRZST FAIR KMKT eats vu.Ba - 0.10700 0.08750 0.08500 0.06875 0.08550 0.08750 0.08500 0.08625 0.08250 0.08300 0.09620 0.08500 0.08400 0.09000 0.08000 0.08250 0.08000 0.07500 0.08250 0.08600 0.08000 0.09000 0.07500 0.07450 0.08625 0.08250 Tx State-• Report 5 PORCRASE MATURIT7 13TEMT PAIR MARKET DA -1L • DA-M A(QIIj LSL VALOL - Bank of Amric■ 03 -19-86 U1 -02 -87 300,000 0.06875 SaearitP 'aderal Savings 02 -28-86 01 -26 -87 100,000 0.08500 Merit Savings Bank 03 -03 -86 01 -27 -87 100.000 0 08500 Royal Oak Savings 6 Loan 03 -03 -86 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.08375 Upland Motional Bank 01 -27 -86 01 -27 -87 100.000 0.08500 Equiten 01 -27 -SL 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.08800 Capital Bank 01 -29-86 01 -29-87 100,000 0.09250 Country Savings Bank 01 -31 -86 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09500 Do. Calif. Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 Q2 -02 -87 100,000 0.09150 Bel -Air Savings 6 Loan 02 -04 -86 0022 04 -87 100,000 0.09250 Westport Savings Bank 02 -05-86 02 -05-87 100,000 0.08750 Pally Savings 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 02 -06 -87 100,000 0.08750 Rancho Bank 02 -13 -86 02 -13 -87 100,000 0.09000 Golden Pacific Savings 02 -14 -86 02 -17 -87 100,000 0.05750 Gold River Savings 6 Loan 02 -14 -86 02 -18-87 100,000 0.08750 Secure Savings 6 Loan 02 -19 -86 02 -19-87 100,000 0.09000 Gibraltar Savings 6 Loan 02 -14 -83 02 -20 -87 100,000 0.10250 South gay $&viaga 6 Loan 02 -25 -86 02 -25 -87 100,000 0.08750 Mt. Whitney Savings 6 Loan 02 -23 -66 02 -25-87 100.000 0.08750 Guarantee Savings 6 Loan 02 - 15 -86 02 -25 -87 100.000 0.08700 Century City Savings 6 Loan 02 -26 -86 02 -26 -87 100,000 0.08750 Mercantile Bank 02 -28-86 03 -02 -87 100,000 0.08500 Titer Savings 6 Loan 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 100,000 0.09000 Southvest Bank 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 100,000 0.07850 Oaiversity Savings 03 -04 -86 03 -03 -87 100,000 0.08750 00,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 'gr Investment status Report Page 6 PORCS.4Sg XLTORITT MTERSST PAM MARKET DATE _ _ DATE AMOUNT RATA yAL08 - brantvocd Savings 6 Loan 03 -04 -06 03 -04-87 100,000 0.08750 Commercial Pacific $nits$ 03 -04 -86 03 -04 -87 100,000 0.08625 Onion Federal Savings 03 -04 -86 03 -04-87 100,000 0.08500 La Jolla Village bank 03 -04 -86 03 -04 -87 100,000 0.08500 Kasbattan bank Savings 03 -05-86 03 -05-87 100.000 0.08750 Guardian Federal Savings 03 -05-86 03 -05-87 100,000 0.08500 Western Family back 03 -06 -86 03 -06 -87 100,000 0.08375 Westco Savings bank 03 -11 -86 03 -11 -87 100.000 0.08750 Alvarado bank 03 -12 -06 -12 -87 100,001 0.08250 �03 Valley National bank 03 -12 -86 03 -12 -87 100,000 0.08100 Bank of America 03 -13 -86 03 -13 -87 100.000 0.07125 Sue Savings 6 Loan 03 -18-86 03 -18-87 100,000 0.08750 %an Mequito National bank 03 -19 -86 03 -18-87 100,000 0.08250 Colifcrnia Security back 03 -21 -86 03 -23 -87 100,000 0.08250 Wils.4irc Centei bank 03 -20-86 03 -24 -87 100,000 0.08125 6nntinstot National bank 03 -25 -86 03 -25 -87 100,000 0.08250 Atlartit Piasacial Savings 03 -25-86 03 -25 -87 100,000 0.08375 Nsrcbect's back 03 -25 -86 03 -25 -87 100,000 0.08250 Consolidated Savings 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100.000 0.08250 Lincoln American Savings 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100.000 0.08150 City %brift A Loan 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100.000 0.08250 Saratoga Savings 6 Loan 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100,000 0.08250 Or.ted American lack, 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100.000 0.08000 "lolden Pacific sack 04 -03 -86 04 -03 -87 100,000 0.08000 iberty Savings 6 Loan 02 -13 -86 09 -14 -87 100.000 0.09250 �, is 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 T� Investment Status Report Page 7 - /3 PORCRASE MA7111ITY INTEREST FAIR MEET JjSTITOT70N DAM DATE AMOUR RATE --ULOR Peaolusul• Savings 03 -20 -66 09 -16 -87 100,000 0.09000 100,0110 Torrance 8aviag■ 03 -20 -86 09 -16 -87 100,000 0.08500 300.000 Eastern Savings 6 Loan 01 -28-86 01 -28 -88 100,000 0.09750 100,000 Cal America Savings 01•J1 -86 02 -01 -88 100,000 0.09600 100,00.1 American Vest Bank 03 -05-86 03 -05-88 100,000 0.08150 100,0011 International Savings Bank 03 -05 -86 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.08750 Ridden Valley National Bank 03 -05-86 03-07 -88 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Pau American Savings Bank 03 -05-86 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Lincoln Savings 6 Loan 03 -06 -86 03 -07 -6,. 100,000 0.08800 100,000 Los Angeles Federal Savings 03 -11 -86 03 -30 -88 100,000 0.09000 100.000 gamiltoa Savings Dank 03 -26 -86 03 -28-88 100,000 0.08300 100,000 Universal Savings Bank 03 -27 -86 03 -28-88 100,000 0.08300 100,000 Does Witter Reynolds 04 -18-85 05 -15-88 97.181 Treasury Billet 111,562 Sunrise Bank 03 -14 -86 09 -14 -88 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Oataeay Savings A Loan 03 -25 -86 09 -25 -88 100,000 O.Od375 100,000 Great Psrific Savings 02 -03 -86 02 -03 -89 100.000 0.09750 100.000 Desert Comosa ty Bank 02 -13 -86 02 -13 -89 100,000 0.09875 100,000 National Bank of Catalina 02 -21 -86 02 -27 -89 100,000 0.09500 100,000 Nert1 Coast Savings 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -89 100,000 0.09250 100,000 Continental Savings 03 -05 -86 03 -07 -89 100,000 0.09250 100,000 Independence Savings 03 -05 -86 03 -07 -89 100,000 0.09150 100,000 Neritag• Oaks Bank 03 -11 -86 03 -10 -89 109.000 0.09000 100.000 batside Savings c Loan i� 03 -11 -86 03 -10-89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 bmestate Savings A Loan 03 -I1 -86 03 -10 -89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 /3 Invaatrat Status Depart Page e jljUxU= PODCSuSE DATE MATURITY RASE AMOU11 j INTERLST 2A7E Suisun valley Bank 03 -12 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09000 Coast Dank 03 -13 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09050 Regency Dank 03 -11 -S6 03 -13 -89 100,000 0108750 Pacific Business Dan% 03 -14 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.08750 Sacrarnto first 3stional 03 -14 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09250 Novato National Seek 03 -19-86 03 -15-89 100,000 0.09500 Dank of Del Mar 03 -11 -86 03 -16 -89 100,000 0.03750 Day Area Dank 03 -17 -86 03 -16 -89 100,000 0.09000 First Aneriean Dank 03 -18-86 03 -17 -89 160,000 0.08750 City Cosurrce Dank 0-21 -85 03 -20 -89 100,000 0.08750 Dank of Coeerres 03 -25 -86 03 -25 -89 100,000 0.09000 Constitution Savings 03 -25 -86 03 -28-89 99,000 0.09250 Pacific Coast Savings 03 -31 -86 03 -30-89 100.000 0.09250 Valley Coarrcial Dank 03 -12 -96 09-08 -89 100,000 0.09250 Stockdale Savings 6 Loan 03 -19-89 09 -15-89 100,000 0 .0 92 30 mission Valley Bank. 03 -26 -86 09 -22 -89 100.000 0.09000 Lincoln Savings A Loan 02 -13 -83 02 -13 -90 100.000 0.11125 Covetasnnt Nat'l Mortgage 04 -16 -84 01 -I5 -2011 784,913 0.13000 *3 Local Agency Invest Fund 12 -04 -85 As Needed 2,250,000 0.09100 Local Agency Invest Fund 12 -20 -85 As Vanden 2.759.000 0.09100 Sub Total, 28,655,836 a P w PAID mARYET PALPE 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 1J0.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 853,593 ,Tlp� �m lnvastmeat Statue Report Page 9 INITITlIIO! PURCHASE eat[ XMIXTr DATE /MOidi L_EGEST PAIM DaR[RS ■an taro[ E?-- . crest Western Savings 02 -19-85 04 -21 -86 7.257.444 0.08000 Sub Totals 7.257,444 54-1 Crest Western Saving■ 01 -31 -86 05-09 -86 100.000 0.08000 Crest Western Savings 03 -03 -86 05 -0I -86 4,100,000 0.18100 Crest Vogtero savings 02 -25-86 07 -28-86 IG0,000 0.0,175 Sob Total: 4.300,000 4 of 04 -07 -86 Grand Total, 40,213,250 Treasury gills are purchased at a price below their maturity value. They are quoted and traded on the basis of yield to maturity. She approximate Interest earned on this six munch investment vill be $25.465.00. The approximate interest earned on this investment vill be $34.000.00. Securities which are backed by pools of government insured or guaranteed aortgages. 4: All investmants are Certificates of Deposit unless otherwise acted above. JOIN i n n n n 1 ,, 62 Y� if ' CL 86 / i LAID rot DAMACR 09 twiny � \ 1. Claims for death, injutp to person, or to personal property at be L'tik+d• Ap.Lour than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, See. 911.2). C. r 11 2. Claim for damages to seal property mart be filed no 1 isi thtn� -rX��u the occurrence (Gov. Code, Set. 911.2). / l�j'j 1 v T0: CITT Or 3ANCE0 CUCAMONCA —Leon V. Arcur( 8197 Alta loam Dr_ 91701 868 -4762 (714) N/A (Adult) Now of Claimant .Address iip phone Age Address to which Claimant wishes notices sent YEY did damage or injury occur? Feb .2 1986 lWed. , apps 10:00 am) 111132 did damse or injury occur? Right slide of windshield WE and under what circumstacces did damsgr or injury occur? While drwtng on Carnelian cnne_dehrie from the storm drxLn that was toeing worked on hit the windshield ThJ% --cause—the windshield to crack NEAT particular action by the City, or its 1ployecs. caused the alleged dmage or injury? (Include ones of employees, if known). tD rnn .rhos the Cucamonga County Mater Dist. re ere informrd that you were the contractor What sum do you claim? Include the sstimted mount of soy prospective loss, insofar as it my be know at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis //off+��computation of the Door claimed. (Attach estimates or bills, if possible). l"D hac/} c�1ri �G.a Sin P 9 y.5 OD Total Am cunt t Claimed: RAW and addra+am of witnesses, doctors, and hospitals: Date 16 Signet a of Claimant a 8, -/8 MAIN FOR DAMA®i or MIURY 1. Claim for death, Injury to pdrson, or to personal property must be filed no later than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sao. 911.2). 2. Claim for damages to real property must be f11sd no later than 7 year the occurrence (Gov. Code, See. 911.2). TO; C14r W RAN= CDCANDOU Washburn .agricultural Serkice Mute 2, Box 26$Q_Qbgis, C 9�7 5616 (714) 884 -2179 Name of Claim=t Addroas Zip Phone -AVF Hillsinner a CDatanro. 290 North "n• a rro . Suite An San Bernardino. fad Address to which Claimant wishes notioes sent. 92401 MIN did damage or injury occur? Pleaan se. ntt.rh.A lif[ did damage or injury occur? Railroad crogning on Hallman St.. 125 feet south of Baseline N X and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? Claimant has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit altho%k guilty of no wrong doing. Since the acelent caused by the negligent design and maintenance of the roaelay at the rnilroad .sing by the cit clnimant slld be indemnified b the cit in the event c a nt s avo to pay any compensation o ert en VM particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damile or injury? (Include eases of employees, if known). Phn l.anrenntlon at wnllman nnA the railroad tracks (Baldwin Park Branch) was t YYr sum do you claim? Include the eatiamted amount of any prospeatima lees, inaorar as it may be know at the time of the presentation of this claim, togatDer with tha basis of computation of the amount claimed. (Attach estimates or sills, If possible). Because the lawsuit has neither been litigated nor settled, the amount of Robert Golden's damaged is u���M4 , However. in his complaint he rays for i generZTamaoea, osa o oarq}QjJ�����ne n n p3city, medical expenses, property d g6,°'P[iS of property= -- anfl she cogis of bii Mina suit. ■ills and addreseea o[ w�taeraea, doc tors, end Eodpitala= Robert Golden is represented by Michael Darlington, 8350 Archibald Avenue, Suite 110, P.O. Box 278, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730; Cecil Alison, 18664 7th Street, Bloomington, California; David Provene o, and H c ae Boitano, employees of claimant. April 4. 1986 Qw"` Date Signature of Claimant Daniel W. Smoke, Attorney for Washburn Agricul- 303(478) -RC(H) tural Service. 17 When did damaga or injury occur? The traffic accident giving rise to this claim occurod on December 5, 1984. one of the drivers, Robert Golden, filed suit in the Superior court of San Bernardino County, uses number, OCV 37129 on December 4, 1985. The claimant was named as a defendant in thr suit and was served with the complaint on January 29, 1986. In his complaint Robert Golden Indicates that his vehicle was northbound on Bollman Avenue when it collided with the claimant's weed sprayer which was operating on the tracks. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM- Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Walter C. Stickney, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAVING AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS W U NKLL INC. IN CONJUNCTION Wilm t U STREET D TURNER AVENUE CU Attached is the Reimbursement Agreement for street improvements to be constructed in conjunction with the required improvements at the northeast corner of the Church Street/Turner Avenue intersection. The agreement covers approximately 7,000 square feet of paving in the Church Street /Turner Avenue intersection and improvements adjacent to a parcel near the project on the northside of Church Street. The amount of ;49,681.65 will be drawn frcm the Systems Development Fund. It is recommended that the City Council approve the Reimbursement Agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute ,ame. Funds In the amount of $49,681.65 are to be drawn from the System Development Fund. qRe,s tful ubpit ted, �� ineer LSH:WS:nas Attachments /9 i AGREEMENT FOR CHURCH STREET /TURNER AVNEUE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH CUP 82 -12 This agreement is made and entered into this 'iii day of 1986 by and between KID'S UNLIMITED. INC. DEVELOP& and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, CITY. RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY and DEVELOPER desire to mutually participate in the construction of Church Street and Turner Avenue improvements; ani WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER has expressed its willingness to include said construction with the required Improvements Improvements for CUP 82 -12. NOY, TNERE,'OR2, 1T-is AGREED AS FOLLOWS: yRX 1. The DEVELOPER shall contract for the construction of Church Street and Turner Avenue, said improvements as further described in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Drawing No. 990. 2. The CITY agrees to share in the cost of improvements for the southerly half of Church Street, the westerly half of Turner Avenue south of Station 10+75 and north of Station 14+50, and the northerly half of Church Street, east of Station 12+46.20 as shown on said Drawing No. 990 in the quantities described in the attached Exhibit •A'. The total hop sum amount being $44,681.65. Incidentals (covering landscape reconstruction and on -site de,veway reconstruction) will be paid for on an actual cost basis not to exceed $5,000 for a total cost not to exceed $49,681.65. 3. The DEVELOPER shall coordinate with affected utility companies for the relocation of the service poles and any other utility interferences within the CITY's portion of the work. -1- 4. The CITY agrees to pay funds to the DEVELOPER in the amount of said share within thirty (30) days of completion and acceptance by the CITY. S. Each party shall indemnify the other parties and its officers, agents and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, acts of omissions on its part or on the part of its officers, agents, contractors and employees in connection with the construction. 6. This Agreement may only be changed with the mutual consent of the parties in the form of written contract amendmcnts. 7. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contef 'ferein are all subject to a successfulccwletion of construction of impr_vea ,. -1; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as the date first above written. MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation by Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney _Z_ I is UN IHI INC. H es P. Donnelly Owner's Agen• - ,g- WORK FRONTING APH 1077- 271 -07 EXHIBIT QA- 7-1/2' A.C. paving 600 tons @ S45.00 /ton $27,000.00 Remove A.C. paving & base 6653 s.f. @ 50.40 /s.f. 2,661.20 Remove PCC paving 6336 s.f. @ 50.60/s.f. 3,801.60 Saw -cut A.C. paving 25P I.f. @ $1.00 /l.f. 258,00 Remove PCC curb & gutter 37 l.f. @ $2.50 /i.f. 92.50 Construct variable height Subtotal Lump Sum Total PCC curb with gutter 37 l.f. @ $9.00 /l.f. • 333.00 Grand Total Subtotal $34,146.30 WORK FRONTING APH 1077- 271 -07 0.42' A.C. paving 4499 tons @ $45.00 /ton 0.46' Class II base 50 tons @ $15.00 /ton 84 curb & 240 gutter 84 l.f. @ $5.75/l.f. 4• sidewalk 363 s.f. @ 51.45/s.f Remove trees 5 trees - lump sum Relocate 1 Edison power pole 1 @ $5,000.00 /each Construct concrete drive approach 190 s.f. @ $3.00 /s.f, Remove block wall 14 l.f. 0 S3.00;l.f. Subtotal Lump Sum Total Incidentals: (Landscaping and on -site driveway reconstruction) not to exceed Grand Total S 2,205.00 750.00 567.00 • 526.35 • 875.00 5,000.00 570.00 • 42.00 $10,535.35 $44,681.65 • S 5.000.0,1 $49,681.65 Y_J M t 1. ■ CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �ncenrq STAFF REPORT f' rCr n DATE: April 16, 1986 J TO: City Council and City Manager Isn FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Horthtown Nhase IV. Contract Documents On Larch S. 1986, Council approved award of the subject project to Val Foth and Sons for $153,832.41. Herewith submitted for execution are contract documents for Northtown Phase IV. Additionally, it is requested that Council authorize the Administrative Services Director tc set aside $169,216.00 (low bid p,}p; contingencies of $15,383.59) for this project to be funded by Community Cevelopment Block Grant and Gas Tax Funds. RECOMMDATION: It Is recommended that City Council authorize execution of the Northtown Phase IV contract documents and direct tha Administrative Services Director to set aside $169,216.00 from Community Development Block Grant and Gas Tax Funds to fund project construction. *Res ull su it e c a3 r' 1JIi KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the following agreement is made and entered into, in triplicate, as of the date executed by the City Clerk and the Mayor, by and between Val Foth a Sons hereinafter referred to as the •CO5T0ZTban7 the city of ant o ucamonga. California, hereinafter referred to as 'CITY.• WHEREAS. pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bids or Proposals, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date specified in said notice; and WHEREAS, City did accept the bid of Contractor Val Foth a Sons . and WHEREAS. City has authorized the City Clerk and Mayor to enter into a written contract with Contractor for furnishing labor, equipment, and material for the construction of Tly'r'IMPROVEMENTS OF NORTH TOWN, eHASE IV. t NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of -the mutual covenants herein contained, It is agreed: _ 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, tools, mater a s, app antes, and equipment for and do the work for the PROJECT TITLE. Said work to be performed in accordance with specifications and standards on file in the office of the City Engineer and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the instruction of the City Engineer. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The aforesaid specific at ons are noorporate ere n Dy re erence t ereto and made a port hereof with like force and effect as if all of said documents were set forth In full herein. Said documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached nereto, together with this written agreement, shall constitute the contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the Contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERNS OF CONTRACT: A. The undersigned bidder agrees to eeecute the contract within ten (10) working days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after the 10 working days, and to complete his portion of the work within CO'IDAYS working days from the date specified in the Notice to F -1 Proceed. The bidder agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages (n the amount of Two Hundred F'fty (5250.00) dollars for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages. 4. INSURANCE The Contractor shall not commence .ark under this contract until he has obtained all Insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. the Contractor shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance: a. Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work sWified herein, to accordance with the laws of thf :-_ State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in fill force and effect during the period cotered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payawnt of compensation to his employees. Contractor, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the City a certification as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for k worker's compensa vi or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions yf that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract." b. For all operation of the Contractor or any subcontractor in IL performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the .following minimum limits and coverage: (1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,0"5 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. (3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. F -2 l as (5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (6) Automobile - Property Damage $250,000 each accident. c. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall: (1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is qualified to do business in the State of California; (2) Name as additional insured the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be so included; (3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or awned by the designated additional insureds shall be called tv to cover a loss under said policy; ?,r (4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: Olt As hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt b, City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter." (5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: (1) Waives all rignt of subrogation against all persu..s and entities specified in subparagrap`. 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional insureds in the policy of Insurance provided for in paragraph b. by rsason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of Contractor or any subcontractor in ,arforming the work provided for herein; (2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. e. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the contract present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or present a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insureds and other provisions required herein. F -3 Q S. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions or a orn a Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. in that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem tinges are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line, Suite C, Ranchr, Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to City, twenty -five dollars (S25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevail'ng rNWof wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work doTs- under the attac%ed contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In fccordance with the provisions of Section o t e a or o e as arsnded by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of t the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires •2 Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the jo,nt apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen -that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: L a. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior, to the request for certificate, or b. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or L c. When the trade can show that It is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or F -4 a7 d. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered aporentices or Journeymen in any ap„renticeable trade on such contracts anJ if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 In the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day s wor or a workmen employed in the execution of this contract„ anJ the Contractor anddmy subcontractor under him shall comply with and W— governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) frr each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herelnbefore mentioned, for each cclendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labnr Code. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to eac workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. 9. CO,YTF 'OR'S LIABILITY: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and its elicted offlciats, o..,cers, agents and employees shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work Or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed In perfor -ing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen, employees of the Contractor or his subcontractors or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection witn the performance of the work. The Contractor shall be resposible for any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obst•uctions or from any cause whatsoever, except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City during the progress of the work or at ary time before its completion and final acceptance. F -5 W. The Contractor will Indemnify City and Its elected officials, officers, agents ar;1 employees against and will hold and save them harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, ,.enalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corpora ion, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connectio with the work. :ration, or act ivitles of the Contractor, his agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether or net there is concurrent passive or active negligence an the part of City, its el -ted officials, officers, agents and employees, but excluding such actions, clams, damages to persons or property, penallttes, obligations, or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, Its employees, servants, ar independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, and in connection therewith: a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, ob igations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expense; includingAebrneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. `-" b. The Contractor will promptly pay any ,Judgment rendered against the Contractor of City, or its elected officials, officers, agents or employees, covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations, and 1labtltties arising out of or in connection with sucn work, operations, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, and the Contractor agrees to save and hold the same harmless therefrom. c. In the event City, without fault, is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against the Contractor for damages k or other claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, the Contractor agrees to pay to City any and all costs and expenses Incurred by City in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys fees. l So such of the money due to the Contractor under and by virture of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damage as aforesaid. 10. NON - DISCRIMINATION: No discrimination shall be made to the employment t of persons upon pu c wor s because of the race, color, or religion of such persons, and every contractor for public works vlolaUno this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of- Division 2. Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 1735 -if said Code. 11. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the Contractor 'or furnishing t e mater a an doing the prescribed work the unit rites set forth in accordance with Contractor's Proposal dated February 21, 1986. 4L F -6 C;) / 1 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES: In the event that any action or proceeding is brought by either party to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover its reasonable attorneys' fee; and costs incurred with respect thereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed with all the formalities reluired by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California Contractor's License No. Zl�9 7 G 7 9 ace ae 7T.J- Title — title CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BY: Mayor BY: Ty Clerk Contractor's Business Phone '21 Y•627 -1/74 Emergency Phone at which Contr99ctor can be reached at any ti¢a ��..• C 3 -6 80 o i F -7 3o ,;�; 87.7 AO.r 007111 "VaEN: 87,846.00 CONTRACT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN By nESE PFESEMTS: THAT vac rrarl a s71s, 7AC. as principal, and as surety, are held and t firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in the just and full amount of S o,o-rrn,um rYru7 -dire 2?xx=sd ryshc._er,dred rntrty_ro words C a� 4U1MH,r is 153,832.41 payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, Jointly d.,, severally, firmly by these C presents. Given under our hands and sealed with our seal this 24th day oft_y A C _. 19�. The condition of the foregoing obligation 1s such that, WHEREAS, the above -named principal is about to enter into a contract •4it1: the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct THE IMPROVEMENT OF NORTH TOWN, PHASE IV in accordance with the AGREEMENT E dated . which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth; i v E NOW, THEREFORE, if the said principal shall well and truly do and perform all things agreed by the principal in said contract to be done and performed, then this obligation is to he void; otherwise it will remain in full force and L effect; PROVIDED, that for value received the undersigned stipulate and agree that no amendment, change, extension of Lice, alteration or addition to said contract, y` or agreement, Or of any feature or item or items of performance required 7 G -1 3f Y CONTRACT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND therein cr thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligsticns of the undersigned under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notica of such amendment, limitation of time For bringing action on this bond by the City, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature or time of performance required therein or thereunder. WITNESS our hands this zarn day of k,tj, 1985 . Tom• ru- 9USIfESS�iQ� 3F CONTRACTOP �a by_ /nQT. y�Title G by . _ Title Individual Partnership x Corporation Other, explain GWIM.-M MD DRR.t�ce AYY - er: SAr 'SIGMA'LREA OF CONTRACTOR MOST BE ACIUMEDGE0 BEFORE A NDTAaT PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOWLEDGE7EMT FORMS (INDIVIDUAL. PARTAPRSHI,', CORPORATION, ETC.) G -2 vo> ' i Mo W.: 003111 atDO i Dzurrm IV 7W FEFVXR = a". CONTRACT I LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT M RW A SW, tae. as principal, and i U. CIA M. d7a AND DOU"A= CCMW as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 municipal corporation, in the just and ful l amount of os-nr,*w rltty_thrvs ft m-&-A v$na/s,.*vd i`IrtY_rto ar,d 411100tAr- f $153.HJJ.1/ words for the payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, Our heirs, executors, administrators successors and assigns, jointly and s!%crally, firmly by these L presents `5 Glvenunder our hands and sealed with our seals this 21th day of /innh . 19 as C The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that. WiIERFAS, the above -named principal is about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct THE C IMPROVEKENT OF NORTH TOWN, PHASE IV in accordance with the AGREEMENT dat-d 19 , :! provided in said contract, which said contract is hereby referred to and 'made a part hereof to the same extent as if L the same were herein specifically set forth; NOW. THEREFORE, if the said principal or principal's subcontractors fail to pay for any materials, provisions, supplies or equipment used in, upon, for or L about the performance of said work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the surety will pay for the same in an 1• amount not exceed the sum hereinabove specified, and in case suit is brought G -3 31 3 CONTRACT LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND here: it reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court, otherwise this bond shall be void •nd of no effect; PROVIDED. that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or Item/items of performance required therein or thereunder shall to any manner affect the obligation of the undersigned on or under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendment, limitation of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature or item or Items of performance required herein or thereunder. This bond shall insure to the benefit of any-and all persons entitled to file Claims under Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, and shall give a rlrrt of actior to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. "'Y WITNESS our hands this 24th day of _ xrrrn 19 as sx romsr as=. Ac. AFGN N bYf H f K-f TItle,7�r� by Title — Individual _ Partnership Corporation _ Other, explain Na K Jerb mr• ACtrrIIny.l+Nh •SIGNATURES OF CONTRACTOR MUST BE AWMWLFDGEO BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATLLCM APPROPRIATE ACKHM&EDMff FORMS (INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.). Q -4 3y t' CAPITAL BOND AND INSURANCE COMPANY 003111 GENERAL POWER OF'ATTORNEY HOME OFFICE - RIVERSIDE KNOW A'.L MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that CAPITAL BOND AND INSURAf10E CO., a Corporation duly orgganized and existing under the laws of the State of California, and having its principal office in tho City of Riverside. California, pursuant to the %, Laws which were adopted by the Directors of the said Company and are now in effect, which sate that: -fie Company President shall have power and authority to appoint Attorneys -In -Fact, and authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakings, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and he may at any time in his Judgment remove any such appointees and revoke the authority given to them.' Has made, constituted and appointed and by these presents does make, constitute and appoint. subject to provisions and limitations herein set forth as KUNN of &W -6e1, CUJT WTA its true and lawful agent and attomey -In -fact to make, execute, seal and deliver as surety. and as its act and deed, bonds and undertakings, contracts of Indemnity, and other writings obligatory In the nature thereof. The authority of such Attorney -in -Fact is not to exceed ON ANY ONE RISK Or nard,eet a FdPbe -dhres andright RE„d 4dR,y_nc end a /rokhr Dollars sis7,au.tf z, And the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Company as fully and amply, to all Intents and purposes, as 11 they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company In their own proper persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CAPITAL BOND AND INSURANCE CO., has caused those presents to be signed by Its duly authorized officer, and Its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this 24th day of qM 19 --ft_ CAPITAL BOND AND I SURANCE CO., By STATE OF CALIFORNIA I esident ^- COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ON thb24.9_ day of Muth AD 19 86 before the subxriber,a Notary PuUO 0 ate Stare of California, N and for the County of Riverside. duly commissioned and Qualified. came Tony Jlmem . Jr., President of CAPITAL BOND AND INSURANCE CO., to me personally known to be the Individual and officer described In, and who executed the preceding Inutument. and he acknowtedges the exocutwn of the game and being by me duty Sworn. deposed A wJd that he b the officer of sold Company, and that the seal alfxod to the Procedmg Instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company a said Corporate seal 8 his Signature as officer were duly affixed It subscribed to the said Instrument by the auNOnty E direction of said Corpwatbn, 8 that the By -Laws al sans Comparry, mfened to In the preceding Instrument are now in force. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand, aria affixed my Official Seat at the CRY of Riverside, the day and year first above written. ........................... • � � orrxu sA GEORGE E. SPRE O NOWAY NOTARY BOND 0a1.13)N j : � RfY[0.4d comity . Watery Putt �.: r ±a»E,Nw�ama. s, :w....f 'AORKER'S COMPENSATION IASURANCE CERTIFICATE The Contractor shall execute the followigg form as requ:•ed by the Calltornfa Labor ^ode, Sections 1360 ono 1861: t am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured sgalnst liability for worker's caapensaticn or to undertake self - insurance in accordance the eper formancetofothe wnrk of this contract. Date: a 1:) 5. fC, f Attest: �y By: ----MgnatuFie to t L+ L 16 % �oTa cSorri1•t! uunntractor Signature) (TJtleF Z� l G -6 3g r t: P R 0 P V S A L SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUM 4MOUNTS _ NORTH TOWN PHASE IV STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA: The undersigned bidder declares that he has carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that he has examined the plans, special provisions and specifications, and read the accompanying Instruction to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, If this proposal is accepted, to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work In accordance with the Plans, Special Provisions and Specifications, in the tiae and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost and tamp Sam amounts set ford in the schedule on the following Proposal. item Estimated No. Quantity Description (Unit Price in Words) Unit Price (In Figures) Total (In Figures) 1 L. S. Cle'ittfig and Grubbing at a lump sum price of &144 f , TI or.ta /j . . /a o r s��0n✓.00 s �S. 0p o.O4 2 975 L.F. Trenching per S.L.E. Requirement for street lights at s �.00 S 5YSa.oe per near not 3 16 L.F. Rove 36' Dia. CHP at per netr o0 s 06 0 0o s Sao 00 der C -1 U PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUN AMOUNTS NORTH TOWN PHASE IV STREET IMPROVEMENTS 4 5 EA Adjustment of Manhole Frames & Covers to Finished 7-1 at •� / f+ n x ac 5 L.S. PVC Drain Pipes, 6- Dia. Schedule 40 & Dissipator Box at Lump Sum of F'IYri r /.ru 6 2 EA Adjust ater Valve Covers to4jefished Grade at <s Wr. r- fir✓ ach 7 L.S•(35+CY) Unclassified Excavation (haul Away) at a Lump Sum of plc -� T_.5.. -tna.� S L.S. Catch Basin #I. per Std. 501 b 502. H•12' and Local Depression per Std. No. 418 Case B at a Lump Sum of .0 T.( a,, s / 19.._ No ✓Js w W 9 43 L.F. Install 360 Dia. Clip, Guage 14 _It fgf0 00 S IOOO 0% S SO OO 00 S $OOO.OA S %SOD $ /+.v•OO ✓ S 3-500 04 S 3500 OL)/ f 70 0o S30 /lAGr7/ per near oot C -2 Bidder 38 PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUN AMOBNTS NORTH TOWN PHASE IV STREET IMPROVEMENTS 10 1753 Tons A cregate Base at per ton 11 910 3 F. 12 2108 L.F. 13 8 C.Y 14 194 L.F FCC Spandrel R Cross Gutter ,er Std. 308 (7 Sack) at �•f`EF .%./ /nos par square fooF 81 PCC Curb 6 214 Gutter per Standard 303 at per linear foot PCC Retaining Curb E PCC Steps per plan at Ivi Der cu c yar 8' AC Berm per Std 313 at S S0G S 970 y" ✓ per near -root 15 375 L.F. 2• z 4• Redwood Header Including stakes at rwo a. /i,6 r S 1:1. d s s* 1 -r. a�- i S?, 00 s3Y5dy on f g.a� sILPF.K.ad'.i S aLo 0 o f 16ao•,e Sol.nn f ���•oD per near oot der C -3 3� s PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF OMIT COST AND LEM SUM AMOUNTS NORTH TONN PHASE IV STREET IMPROVEMENTS 16 3219 S.F. FCC Drive Approach per .Ud. 305 (7 sack) at per square foot 17 6936 S.F. 4' PCC Sidewalk, Walkway & Handicap Ramp per Std 310 & 311 at per square cot 18 1 Tons 4' AX pavement and 0.1' minimum overlay per plan at r'jtc.7'r .Gsr a4 / /lef per ton 19 L.S. Traffic Striping, Pavement Marking & Signing at a Lump Sum of Tj�n !- �or•S a..� aG //_ +nom sa. /d sG7sue„ Z f J..t/o t22/e-- z �y J1 � a9. � � � �! 34.1.78 ✓ ,.a,, o o .r o f �000, on TOTAL SUM OF 8I0 ~ -} cv� H.. -4&41 (Words) 7-40&9A-;1 zle4r • J�iN:s, T4, o Y %.rn F." rr gures C -4 0 d er •- '.'��'Y+ -. al+ +5 �,4,`ir >��4.: 7- ;M,� }• ..:".li•l.r�L {��•�s, TV PROPOSAL BIDDER AGREEMENT The undersigned also agrees as follows: FIRST: Within 15 calendar days from the receipt of the Notice of Award of Contract, to execute the contract, and to furnish to the City of Rancho InvitingaBidsoguaranteeingctheyfaithfulnPerformancesofpthef werkiandhpayment of bills. SECOND: To begin work within 10 calendar days .*ter the dale specified in the Notice to Proceed and to prosecute said work in such a manner as to complete it within Forty Five (45) working days after such specified date. Accompanying this proposal is cash, a cashier's check, or a certified check of a bidders bond for not less than ten percent of the total amount of the uid payable to the City which Is to be forfeited, as liquidated damages, if, in the eve the contractor does not execute the contract and furnish satisfactory bonds under 1 :4 conditions and within the time specified in this bond proposal, otherwise octhe,undersignedCFeWithinr15fcalendarkdays afterr$s award of the contract City will return the bidders bond accompanying such Proposal not considered in making the award. All other bidders bonds will be held until the contract has been finally executed. They will then be returned to the respective bidders whose proposals they accompany. BIDDER: Ua of --- •• IF wooer is a corporation, state ego name copartnership, and true name ofrfirmeand namestofyallrindividualncopartners composing firm; or an individual, state first and last names in full. Licensed in accordance with an act provid!ng for the registration of Contr,ctors, License No. .?o , SIGN HERE o e_.;Z' a -si•� �'—z F t e — Oat1e ( r 1G1e a-6 to — Of ice^ 1 A/. �e T tie a�j to Signature and title of the officer(s) set forth above shall be authorized to sign contracts on behalf of the corporation, copartnership or individual. If signature is by an agent, other than an officer of the corporation or a member of a partnership, a Power of Attorney must be on file with the City prior to or at time of bid opening; otherwise the bid will be subject to rejection by City Counsel. D -1 W PROPOSAL BIDDER INFORMATION The bidder shall furnish the following information. Additional sheets may be attached if necessary: NAME OF FIRM: _ J I F —..-,t r Type of Firm: Corporation %A Individual_ Partnership__ Business Address: 1 3p 77 !Qo A.r 1 Place of Business Place of ?nsidence Telephone: -2 4. 7 Contractors license: State: a/ License No.-2.O (lames and titles of all members of the firm: �e Je,c�- F i'f sac /.... S -ter %�.✓ �� %.— _ (lumber of years as a contractor in construction work of this type: Three projects of this type recently completed: Contract ,tmptn Type of Project Date Completed ors O o D.�O tT Z'n A Y f2sa: /9RS ve r�grS�,Mt ars. off. 7f . ee ce - ----�' '�' —fi, `•o .r rL�+. 12 RA.eee Person who in ;petted site of the Proposed work for your firm: Name: 1//) o ¢ / / j,( Date of Inspection: -,� p�_ NOTE: If statement ty City, the Bidder shall furnish a notarized financial statement, •eferences, and other information, sufficiently comprehensive to pewit an appraisal of his current financial contlftion. E -1 414 PROPOSAL SUBCONTRACTORS In compliance with the provisions of the Government Code Section 4102, the undersigned bidder herewith sets forth the name and location of the place of business of each sub- contractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the general contractor in or about the construction of the work or Improvement in an amount in excess Of one -half Of one percent (1 /2%) of the general contractor's total bid, and the portion of the work which will be done by each sub- contractor as follows: Place of Subcontractor's Name Business Description of (Address 6 Phone) Work / ?SFr. s.. L• 7. -v:•� .�04/ �c w.t I sT E -2 �13 PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION OF NOR- OISCRIMTNATION BY CO? TRACTORS As suppliers of goods or services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the firm It sted below certifies that it does not discriminate to its employment with regard to age /handicap, race, color, religion, sex or national origin, that it is 1n crnpllance with all federal, state and local directives and executive orders regarding non- discrimination in employment; and that It agrees to demonstrate positively and aggressively the principle of equal opportunity in employment. We agree specifically: 1. To establish or observe employment policies which affirmatively promote opportunities for minority persons at all job levels. 2. To cocraunicate this policy to all persons concerned, including all comppny employees, outsidetedruiting services, especially those serving minority communities, and to the minority communittes at 'arge. 3. To take affirmative steps to hire minority employees within the firm. DATE a - a r— f/- Please include any additional information available regarding equal opportunity employment programs now to effect with In your firm. E -3 i 5z -4 Sr ._. ram.. E.t S+rr'. :�-� ?�e,,.:,��' -°sC•. �,r,ol:4 ;.�°Y'.' -. - 3 -25 -86 ' 'wtCPTmCAT[4 fSUtO AfAwR!]Gi[•AO]WTgPOl.LL•NO c u1 i •4s•pR {tl'PoNM1i CRIVIGtT[vO1010. TRi]KPIVIG{i[NfS WTJYWp, Coffin- BaBeharC Ins. cnw. 441 N. Central Ave. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Upland, CA 91786 cCU..Nr .1 American States Ins. Co. PED •^•Nun LT"CR 1 Val Foth 6 Sons, Inc, u•N..]. 12377 Roswell Ave, rtR Chino, CA 91710 it=cR - •]q••_- w0.D•,n ^!C isC, IV* .NCI USLLJ•llV.tMiY3'LIN 1. %UIOTO L'.SUP9 •A•.J 'i PT { tRN1, TC:.II CA CGl9O'y r. nC�IID.0 ^i 09•! <C'3. IIt- -=, t.M: 'TLO t'SL.J '\•it{rAT N, n•l115'NINp A tIDACCO,;T•wL0{,{1C(3_'•ECA.pIO I.IArV f3llrbL: .. LCL JS, J.3�wCM1�.r•DCC.•6{. j� •! ]r n.Aal..C°_ .. FtIA •� � •'TS 4�PCYSANDS � CuuaL 31a6Vi1 I I vi•:Nl a :� _.Si[J•Sll 4 V a �w J A x _.r S �• ^ _•••:lsrurca PP- 0376111 '[�+ 1 -13 -86 1 -13 -87 .W4 r�A 5 5 X. n �.-nccnro s.•STas I Ix P I J soi ---;5001 I S500. x x� a!\r cTTalasa , •" X -. yrvlm OA't3f[ I X aF _ _ - tai ^.u.•uWV i 500, City of Rancho Cucamonga r; 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 u r a ., • .ti •l0 WlCS hVY q15 i I f .f! -�+x LLt Gf[J uRCS (('NA,AU]� I vi•:Nl a :� S •P I ! 040A]m lJtCl I O!+ wtarn , •" Isvcw ,R'OR][A3'ICVid1fATIW! � I t .•.MWr . us I I S .Dar .cmtAn t [aturu] u3e S 'u xia Till City of Rancho Cucamonga r; 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 u PROPOSAL NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (This affidavit shall be executed by all bidders at the time of bid opening. Failure to Complete the form may constitute the bidder being judged non_ responsive and having his bid rejected.) To the City of Rancho Cucamonga: The undersigned bidder is sub J -g a bid for performing the following work by contract, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That the undersigned bidder has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any dction in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with such contract. THE IMPROVElLWT OPWRTH TOWN, PHASE IV 'xs or LjL Fn —S P Jod's .K 4'L BU IY by l;d /7-iX. Title, by Title Individual, Partnership Corporation .._ Other, explain •SIGNATURES IF CONTRACTOR MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE AWOWLEDGNENT FORMS (INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.) E -4 7� 1NFORNATION REQUIRED OF BIDDER BID DEPOSITORIES The binder shall answer the following questions and shall attach any additional information required. Yes No 7c 1. ller_ bid depository or registry services used in obtaining subcontractorbid figures in order to compute your bid? Z. If the answerto 1 is eyes' please forward a copy of the rules of each bid depository you used with this bid questionatre. Yes- No 3. Did you have any source of subcontractor's bids other than bid depositories? Yes_ No X 4. �y any person or group threatened you with subc tractor boycotts, union boycotts, or other sanctions to attenp to convince you to use the servicesor abide by the rules of one or more bid depositories? 5. If the answer to 4 1s •yes' please provide the following details: (a) Cate (b) Name of person or group (c) Job involved (if applicable) (d) Nature of threats (e) Additional conraents (use additional sheets if necessary) E -6 ell PROPOSAL In accordance with Government Code Section 14310.5, the Bidder shall Complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire: QUESTIONNAIRE Has the bidder, any officer of the bidder, or ary employee of the bidder whc has a proprietary interest in the bidder, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise pravented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety reoulationl Yes_ No -_ If the answer is yes, e-1-in the Circumstances in the fallowing space. Note: This questionnaire constitutes a part of the Proposal, and signature on Lire signature portion of this Proposal shalt constitute signature of this questionnaire. E -7 /y g> J ♦ y y, q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlIOiVGA C w C = Ar«Joe a )I��rir V i rw.w.rw 19:> ae.rw,J If ReeudJt Oil Jrllrc.Aar a1ij rvnr4J ur,� ADDENDUM llo. 1 North Town Phase IV Street Improvenents The bidder's attention fs directed to Page N- Contract Specifications which addresses the 12' 'Certificate- which or subcontracts sub perform of the the film subject to the a ante of previous g of the required reports. goal oCDartunfty clause and All bidders shall submit said certificate which shall fa bid proposal to be submitted by 2:30 P.M. on February 21, 1986 at the City Clerk's office, City of Rancho Cucamonga, form Dart of the Acknowledgment of this Addendum No. 1 signature below and shall be included 4aaers c,�u — y i.a are rAC &M r Sows ,Ik 12377 �rs.,Cjc AC CA01W to elJ710 shall be noted by the bidders In the bid package. —a=--I ad/e- T� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROH: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Gideon V. Arra, Engineering Technician F101 19" SUBJECT: Award of Professional Engineering Services Contract to Associated Engineers for Installation of Storm Drains and Street Reconstruction of Hillside Road between Malachite and Archibald Attachrd for Council aMWVal is a contract for Engineering Design its Services to prepare plans, specifications and estimates for the reconstrutlon and improvements of the subject project. This project has been included in this year's Capital Improvement Program budget for design and construction. The design services will be performed with SO 325 Finds at an estimated cost of $11,950 plus 10: contingency RECOMMIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Professional Services Agreerent with Associated Engineers, to provide plans, specifications, and estimates for the Improvement and widening of Hillside Road in accordance with the stipulations of said Agreement, for an amount not to exceed $11,950 plus 10% contingency. ReSPeStfully submitte , LBH: A: be Attachments SO r , PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement Is made and entered into this day of 19_, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY-) and Associated Engineers (hereinafter referred to as •CONSULTANP). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore Issued its Request for Proposll pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of plans, soeclfirations and estimate (P 5 aE ) for the installation of storm drain and street reconstruction of Hillside Road between Malachite aqd Archibald Avenue. XV ('Project• hereafter). (ii) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistants to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (Iv) CONSULTANT represents that it Is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined NOW. THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: S. AgrLMent. ��• 1, Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the a ;w following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: 7/31/85 d (a) Project: The preparation of P.S.Lc. for the installation of storm drain and street reconstructinn of Hillside Road between Malachite and Archibald Avenue. described in Exhibit •A• Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both ersl and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any dnd all wo -k sessions, public hearings and other meetings coiducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTAW7111n order to complete the project. MM (c) Completion of Project: The date of completion e' all phases of the proje t, including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit 00" Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT aorees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit •A and applicable with Federal. State and CRY statutes, regulations, ordinances and gutdelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. lb) CONSULIANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as •documents') including all supplenental technical documents, as described in Exhibit W to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit -2- 5a f 'B'. Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit 'A'. CITY nay thereafter review and for-tar! to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall Yvereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary CITY shall receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set fo -:h pursuant to tnis Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persd�hs are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sv.m of !11.950.00 _ for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect custs or fees, including the work of employe -a, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'L". (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall to made by CITY in accordance wita the invoices subnitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a ressonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C' either with respect to hourly rates or lump ;um amounts for individual tasks. In no .1 S� f , event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Exhibit W. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT-any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final parent 0511 be made not ater than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY. and not included in the Scope of Services a} set forth in Exhibit •Af, creof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit •C'. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit W hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in orde• to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial = ontact with respect to the gathering of such information. '4' S� 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications 'tr by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination; This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written •Notice of Termination' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated. CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit •C•, on a pro - rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, .models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by s_ SS G CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cruse. 7. Notices and Oesionated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: BLANE W. F MOSEN on behalf _of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and James E Kindin for and in behalf of Associated Enoineers. 316 East •E" Street Ontario CA 91761. T Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepdid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or c=panies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the tern of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Coaoensaton Insurance: Before beginning work. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' conpensaton insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. - 6- s6 I , In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and Vle with CITY a ce ^tification as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of Lie work of this Agreement'. (b) IVlic Liability and Prooerty Damage: Throughout tbs. term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times du -ing the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions (•malpractice') providing protection of at least __t250.000.GO for errors and omissions ("malpractice") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in ` -7- S7 I responsible Insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, 1's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shalt contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and C:TY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) th., policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with ies of all such policies promptly upon receipt ego them, or certificate evidencinq the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, In any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment): No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of rerformance hereunder shall be made, eithe- in whols or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shalt not be construed for any purpose to be SO employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is Instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonole. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and .i1 other agreements, eithe,• oral or in writing, between the parties with respect -i to the sib,iect matter he n. Each ('arty to this Agreement acknowledges that" no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing si,r!d by all parties. IN 'IITNES. WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT - ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Apri H. Harris, provident CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jeffrey Kin¢. Hayor ATTEST: never y A. Authere-F.-TTEY-7 er -9- 6-T Date: 4/755.,- . Date: Approved as to form: City Attorney EI. M! i EXHIBIT A TO PROPOSAL TO CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATED MARCH 21, 1986 HILLSIDE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS SCOPE OF WORK FEE 1. Check and update the survey information plotted in the plan. $1000 2. Revise the plat to accomodate facilities and improvements show In red line drawing in accordance with the City Standard Drswings * 2700 0. Prepare Right- of-way doeiR�ep is to include plat and easement deed for Assessoovs Parcel No. 1061 - 571 -01 Z registered in the names of Donald C. Evens 6 Miki E. Evens. Final documents for the Tolstoy property shall be reviewed and updated prior to signing. Title report for the mentioned parcels will he provided by the City for your reference. 1000 4. Reissue preliminary notices to utility companisa and monitor responses to such notices. 500 S. Prepare Specifications, bid package, and engineers estimate for the noted work to be constructed as a project by itself." 5500 6. Attend project coordination meetings as required to Complete P.S. 6 E. including pre - construction conferenca.s 500 7. Prepare Exhibita "A ", "B ", and "C" for Design Service: Agreement (include such as part of the proposal) A. Scope of Work 6 Fee R. Design Schedule C. Hourly Rates and Pees for Extra Workings 750 TOTAL Fat $11,950 Reproduction costs will be billed separately at our direct cost. lof 2 %O *Fee based on one revision. The fee for subsequent revisions will be negotiated beforeh*nd or billing will be at the appropriate rates per Exhibit eGn **The fee is based on the use of Green Book standard sp:cifications and the use of City's "boilerplate" and standard items with special provisions submitted "caoera ready" by consultant. ***A maximum of 8 man- hours. Additional time will be billed at the appropriate hourly rate(s) per Schedule "C ". 2 oft Zx N Job No. 86 -21 M I EXHIBIT 8 TO PROPOSAL TO CITY OF RANCP3 CUCAHOBCA DATED MARCH 21, 1986 EILL.9IDE ROAD IhPROVENFVTS Design schedule, assuming no major new utility interferences and minimal plan review turnaround time. 1. Complete review of nxisitnil plans and survey data. April 18, 1986 2. Complete preliminary plan revisions and aubait to City for review. Hay 2, 1986 3. Reissue notice to utilities, with preliminary revised plaRse Hay 7, 1986 4. Complete preparation of R/U documents and plats, Ewens and Tolstoy. April 18, 1986 S. Complete final revisions to flans incorporating City's comments and information from ut_litie's responses. Hs; 30, 1986 6. Complete draft specifications and subnic to City for review. May 23, 1986 7. Complete final specificationa and bid package including Engineers' estimate. Juno 6, 1986 Job No. 86 -21 M I EXHIBIT •C" Associated Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS_. 316 EAST 'E' STREET • ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91764 MAILING ADDRESS. P.O. BOX 9419. ONTARIO. CA 91761 HOURLY RATES (Ef ective 0 /85) (714) 966.5916 OF7ICE TINE Principal Registered Civil Engineer Sa2.00 per hour Principal Licensed Land Surveyor $66.00 per hour Senior Land Planer $63.00 per hour Associate Land Planer $58.00 per hour Civil Engineer 1. Senior $66.00 per hour 2. Associate $58.00 per hour 3. Assistant $50.00 per hour A. Junior $41.00 per hour Senior Designer /Draftsman $48.00 per hour Designer /Draftsman $43,00 per hour Draftsman -1 $40.00 per hour Draftsman -2 $35 00 per hour Engineering Aide $27,00 per hour Secretarial $25.00 per hour FIELD TINE 3-Man Survey Party $153 00 per hour 2-Man Survey Party $122.u0 per hour Above schedule is for straight time only. In case of Overtime requested by client, the :ate charged for will be 1 -1/2 times the hourly rates storm and Sundays and Holidays at 3 times the hourly rates shown. These hourly rates do not include printing costs, which are billed at cost, computer charges, or fees paid to Governmental agencies or others. '1J PLANNING DESIGNING S RVEYINn 1! a r Tentative Tract 10827 was approved by the Planning Commission on July 25, 1984, for the division oL 57.7 acres into 321 lots /parcels in the Low and Let Madium Development Distr W located between Hermosa and Haven Avenues, south' of Wilson. The Developer, Relco Industries, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: T10827 T10827 -2 TIO827 -3 Faithful Performance Bond: $350,000 $661,000 $420,000 Labor and Material Bond: $175,000 ;330,500 $210,000 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.SR.s have ai;o been approved by the City Attorney. RECONEIOATIOY It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 10827, 2 and 3, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Resp¢ttfully- Submitted, 7LB�dbs Attachments 6V v STAFF REPORT yp�'"r"�'�� S c � LL I }yLO. U DATE: April 16, 1986 t9:7 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 10827 - 2 and 3 located between Hermosa and Haven Avenues, south of Wilson submitted by Relco Industries Tentative Tract 10827 was approved by the Planning Commission on July 25, 1984, for the division oL 57.7 acres into 321 lots /parcels in the Low and Let Madium Development Distr W located between Hermosa and Haven Avenues, south' of Wilson. The Developer, Relco Industries, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: T10827 T10827 -2 TIO827 -3 Faithful Performance Bond: $350,000 $661,000 $420,000 Labor and Material Bond: $175,000 ;330,500 $210,000 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.SR.s have ai;o been approved by the City Attorney. RECONEIOATIOY It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 10827, 2 and 3, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Resp¢ttfully- Submitted, 7LB�dbs Attachments 6V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEE=RING DIVISION �s RUW12/ NORTHWOOD RANCH Frr"F"bd + Vf-*W� wrwouowau•tw�wu l!� PROJECT: Tr 1®A7- '� TITLE: EXHIBIT:_ w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 10827 - E and 3 located between Hermosa and Havvi Avenues, south of Wilson submitted by Helco Industries Tentative Tract 10827 was approved by the Planning Commission to July 25, 1984, for the division 4 57.7 acres into 321 lots /parcels in the Low and Low Medium Development Distr t located between Hermosa and Haven Avenues, soutli of Wilson. The Developer, Relco Industries, 1s submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the Tullowing amounts: T10827 T10827 -2 T10827 -3 Faithful Performance Bond: $350,b00 $661,000 $420,000 Labor and Material Bond: $175,000 $330,500 $210,000 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.f.dR.s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 10827, 2 and 3, accepting saiu agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sa;d agreement and to cause said map to record. Res, r full ubmi ted, LS (LB. as Attachments NORTHWOOD RANCH w..a naranW o.++sn.n urr woaawnr+ cusoru CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECT: TITLE; 7 EXHIBIT;_ ✓�1 j +y=: CITY OF AAACIIO CUCAMCRGA IMPROVEMENT ACREEMEOT FOR TRAC. NO 10027 KNOW ALL NEN BY THESE PRCSENTS: That this agreement Is made and entered Into. In conformance with the provisions of the Subdivlslon Map Act of the State of California, and of the aPPI cab la Ordinances Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and First Ratienwidw Network Mortgage Company, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Developer WITNESSETH: THAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property In said City as shown an the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract No 10071- ; and WHEREAS. said City has established certain requirements to be ant by said gnveloper as prerequisite to approval of said Yll n su6t ls:on generally located between Hermosa and .faven soutt;?f NOW. THEREFORE. It Is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: I The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all Improvements described on page 6 here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be In default on the day roll* Ing the first anniversary date of said approval malt-; an eaten slam of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 0 The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be sutwitted to the City in writing not less than 10 days before tae expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the r l ght to revttw the provisions of this agreement, Including the cunstructloo standards, cost estimate, and Improvement security . and to require adjustments therein If any substantial change ha occurred during the term hereof a. If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any tlsv to Cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. S. The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said developmert In accordance with the regulations, schedules, and • as of the Cucamonga County Water District 6 The Developer shall be resonaslble for replacesent, relocation, or removtl of any component of any Irrigation water system I conflict with construction of required Improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7. Improvements required to be constructed shall c/o Oaten industries Blvd.. el 68 E 5767 Wilshire ihl Blvd., Ste. 670 Los Angeles. LA 9,= -1636 rrry (h "T'RK 7. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file In the office of the City Engineer. Said Improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estlmate, hereby Incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the Improvement plans listed thereon by ouster. The Daveloper shall also De responsible for construc- tion of any transitions or other incidental work boyand the tract bcundarles as needed for safety and proper surface drainage E rors or oemisslons discovered during constructin Shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to solo plan modifications Shall be covered by the provisions of to it agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. a Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with a ttestion given to safety procedures, control of dust, nalse, or ocher nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the peoaltiet provided therefor. 9. The Oevelepar shall be rasa, •ble for removal of o1F�vase rocks and other debris from put rights -of -ray wyhin a edlolning said dreai ^neent resulting from work relative -lo said development. 10. York done within -misting Streets shall be r"I ligently pursued to completton; the City shall have the light to complete any and all wort in the erect of unJ "stifled de.ay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful meant It Sold Developer shall at all times following dedlca. tlon of the streets and easements In sold subldivislon, up to the neap etlon and acceptance of said work or Improvement by sold City Council, lire geed and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every danicrous condition existent In Said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the completion of all Improvements, herein Incorporated on page d , to be performed. each of said streets not accepted as I mproveeents shill be under the charge of said Developer Said p ereleper,ur c ism all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained In a temporary street cloture permit. Issued by tee City Engineer, whenever It is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the Improvements hereto agreed to be made. 12 Parkwdxl trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been Completed. Planting Shall be done as ipprored by thedCity Co: unity Development Director. Planting diagram The Developer shall be rem DOnsible for waintaining all trees planted Is good With until the end of the yygarantsed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever if later. 13. The Oeveloper is responsible for meeting all coadl- tlonS established by the City Parsmant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Ordlaaces, and this agreement for the development. and for the maintenance of all ieprorements constructed thereunder .2. rA unt 11 the Improvement Is accepted for maintenance by the City. and no Improvement security provided herelnvith shall be released before such acceptance u l mss otherwise provided and authorlted by in Clty Council of the City. 11 This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a at. agreement together with the required Improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released 15. The Improvement security to be furnilhed by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and s hail be In a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A To secure faithful performance of this agreement 1 A bond or bonds 0;• one or more duty authorized COrporate sureties In the form and Content specified by Government Code Section 66199.1. 2 An Improveaent Security Instrument in the form '1'r and content specified by the City Attorney. 7 A, deposit with the City of money Or negotta ►le banes of the kind approatd for securing deposits of public Monte& B TO secure laborers and materlalment I A bond or bonds by ono or More duly authorlted corporate sureties I. the faro and content specified by Government Code Sectlan 66199 1 2. An Improvement Security Instrument In the fore and content specified by the City Attorney. 5 A deposit with city or money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final map for the settingg of all boundary, lot corner, and Street canterliee monuments and for furnishing centerlino tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit say be any .mount certified bl the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment 1n full; Cr. If me value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Lan &trUCtlOn and Bond Estimate contained herein. Said cash deposit way be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after recolpt by the City Of the Centertlne tto notes and written assurance of payment In full from the engineer or surveyor. D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 Of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements described In this agreement shall be free from defects In materials and workmanship Any and all portions of the Improve - nots found to be defective within one (1) year following the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security In a sum equal to ten percr:t (10%) of the construction es tIme 4 or $200.00, whichever Is greater, to secure the faithful perrormance of Developer's Obllgat Ow, as described in this para- graph The maintenance guarantee security shall Also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the .0. 70 ,� Developer to do specified wort with respect to any partway maintenance assessment district Once the improvements have been by the accepted athel other slmD improvement security has a 4 this autharite Ey released that Act such and any release applicable otherwise City Ordinance. 17. That the 0evelnper shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage In.urance as shall protect his and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from clal +s for property damages whlth may arise because of the -&lure of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations ,e by himself or by amy contractor or subcontractor or anyone directly or Indirectly by heed negligencers oft, then s0 el eloper or orda any contractor or suocontraetor or anyone employed by said persons The public llebllltr and property damage niura.ce shall list the o City as rJditonal Insured and Sit eetly protect the City, its agents and employees. at well as the Developer, his contractors an his subcontractors, and all insurancs policies Issued hert'i0lr shall so state The sinfaun amounts of such Insurance steal a as follows! q A Injury err, death bliability limits of vnotn less bodily 1700.000 for each person and $1.000,00D for each Ityl limitsrofcnotrleis, than SIOOa000 foraeachlacci- dent or occurrence with an a9g�e9ste limit of tloni0 of claims 0... toper bin may performance of ethe wort herein provided 9 Automobile liability Insurance covering all vehicles -used In the performance Of thls agreement providlnr bodily Injury liability limits of not less than $!00,000 for each person and $700.000 for liability miItmitsr of tmetr leis• than ism property fora eiCli accident sr occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $100,000 which may arise from the opera- tions of the Developer or his I tractor I% performing the wort provided for her I9. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the city A certificate or Certificates of Insurance covering the specified Insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an andorserent precluding the ray such tCertificate reduction before in thcoverage aapiatlon of policy hirty (30) days after the City shall here race,, ad notification by registered mall from the insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and the If Intent to c2gl with to owing described ImproveOantt security,ldandh hassuaffixed his signature hereto: I fA1TIITUL rCRTONIIANCE Tynd: Pr Incip" Amount: S 730.000 Marne +nd address If '.urcty: iW ERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Typo: Prtncln +l Arount: S 173.000 Marne and address of surety: CASII DEPOSIT MOKU,:r NTAT1ON Type; Princt0l Amount: S 1.130 00 Mae, and address of surety: Ty MAINTENANCE GUARApTEE IRx Type Princll•al Amount: N/A Nase and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR 10 ACCEPTANCE OT TIIE CITY IN YITNESI Nty a the parties hereto have usait these Preaeetf to ui duly executed and ecl mrlth d0 with all to nalltles required by Iin MYIMIDZ dates l¢aithrn COMPANY their s lgnituref A CALIFOteIA COATO[ TIM Date �3 K ,Develooer h� •'* loam earl, Vic President eAnne Aced, Assistant Secretary Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla A Muss c 19 &1 Corporation By: Mayor Alt'st: � ] Crt ' APproredi 1 f DEVELOPER'S SICNATURC MUST BE NOTARIZED �- . 7- S M\ �1 {3 �i JST NATIONWIDE SAVINGS April 2, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9323 Base Line, Suite "C" Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Reference: lrrevocablo Letter of Credit Number: 696 -S Tract Number: 10827 Faithful Performance Gentlemen: At the request and for the account of First Nacianwlde Network Mortgage Company, we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 696 -5 in the amount of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND !:n rrkYc teikn Onn nnl This Irrevocable Letter of Credit is available against your Sight Drafts drawn on First Natfocwide Savings and accompanied by your Letter certifying that cite City of Rancho Cucamonga is entitled under its Agreement with First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, relating to Tract Number 10827 Said Certification shall be final and binding on the right of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to so draw. The amount available under this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 696 -5 will be reduced from time to time to the extant of payment of your Drafts or upon your written authority drawn hereunder and upon your request, upon te- ceiving from you a Letter certifying the amount by which thic Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 696 -5 Is to be reduced, and the amount that will be available hereunder afte: such. reduction. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 696 -5 expires on April 7. 1988 in the United Staten of America We hereby undertake that your Drafts when drawn under the terms and conditions of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be duly honored by us upon presentation. Please ensure that all Drafts bear a reference to our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 696 -5 Respectfully Submi [te FIRST NATIOIWIDE SAkdNCS, A Federal Savings and Loan Association It I AE REED, A551STA.1T SECRET 73 1 r 1sr NATIONWIDE SAVINGS April 2, 1966 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Linz. Suite "G" Rancho Cuca =onga, Californin 91701 Reference: Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number: 699 -S Tract Nut >er: 10827 Labor and Materials Gentlemen: At the request and for the account of First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 699 -S In the amount of ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($175,OOD.00) This Irrevocable Letter of Credit is available against your Sight Drafts drawn- an First Nationwide Savings and accompanied by your Letter certifying that th- City of Rancho Cucamonga Is entitled under its Agreement with First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, relating to Tract Huber 10827 . Said Certification shall be final and binding on the right of the it�yoRncho Cucamonga to so draw. -- The amount ava:labla under this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 699 -S will be reduced from time to time to the extent of payment of your drafts or upon your written authority drawn hereundrr and upon your requests upon receiving from you a Latter certifying the amount by which this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 699 -S is to be reduced, and the amount that will be available here- under after such reduction. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 699 -S expires on April 2. 1986 In the United Staten, of tuaerlca We hereby undertake that your drafts when draw under the terms and condition, of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit will by duly honored by us upon presentation. Please ensure that all Drafte bear a reference to our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 699 -S Respectfully Submitted,. FIRST NAT1JN1tIDE SAVI A Federal Savings and Loan Association 7�4 , CITY OF RAMCIIO CUCAMO.AGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TR%CT MO. 10027 - 7 KNOW ALL YEN 81 THESE PRESENTS: That this ageement Is sad# and entered Into, in conformance with in* pr ovif ons of the Subdivision Map Act of the Slate of California, and e applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cue nqa, California, a mun.sipai corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and First Nationwide Metwort Mortgage Company, a California Corporatlrn, hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEPEAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property In fold Cl1y as shown on the conditionally approved subdlVIf Ian tnorn as Tract No. 10011 -a; and WHEREAS. said City has established certain requlrements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said I bdlrislan generally located between Hermosa and daven south of 7 NOW, THEREFORE. It Is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to can'tract at Derelo0ar•f exp ensa all Improvements described an Page G here- of e;thin helve months from the effective date hereof 2. This agreement shall be effective an the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement This agreement shall be in default on the day follow. Ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an caten. sloe of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed S The Developer may request an ectenslon of time to complete the terms hereof. Sucb request shall be submitted to the City In writlrg not less than SO dart before the capiratlon date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time Tso City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, Including the construction standards. cost estimate. and improvement security. and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 1. If the Developer fall% or neglects to Comply With the provisions of this al the City shall here tee right At any time to cause said provisions to be net by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred 5 The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said development In Accordanco with the regu Littons, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water District 6. The Developer shall be resPcnslble for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any Irrigation rater aYate In Conlllet with epnstruellon of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water System. 7 Improvements required to be constructed shall s 1 c/o Se1Cq InJuitries 5757 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 670 cmummomw Los Angeles. CA 47036-3676 MYCEM • 7 Improvements required to be constructed shill conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and 00 Nle In the office of the City Eng /veer Said Improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Band Estimate, hereby Incorporated an page 6 hereof, as taken from the ImProvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for coestrue- tlgn of any transi [loot or other Incidental work beyond the tract be ndarles of needed fo safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or aulssions eiscovered during conitructin shall be corrected upon the direction of the City !ngineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the previsions of this agreement and secured by tha surety covering the original plapned works. 8. Construction permits shalt be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations llste.l thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control or durst, noise, or other nuisance to the area. and to prober noel /utlon of public utlllti as and City Departments Failure to comply with this sectlon shall be subject to the penalties Provided therefor 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loosc 'acts anQ othar debris from put'ic rights- of•way within or ad%enlag said development resulting from work relative It said Q velopment. 10. York done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay In completion, cad to recover all cost and ..pans@ Incurred from the Derain. r and /or his contractor by any lawful meant it Said Developer shall at all times following dedica- tion of the streets and easements In said subldiv hlon, up to the completion and acceptance of said wart or Improvement by said City Council, give goad and adegcate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition eaisttnt In said street or easement, and wits protect tha traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions until the completion of all improvements, herein Incorporated on Page 6 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as Improvements shall be under the charge of said Develorer. Said Oeveloper,say close all or a portion of any street subject to 'he Conditions contained In a temporary Street closure permit, Issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect tie public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made 17. Parkes yk' trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as IS rovided approved by Ordinance planting diagram theCityComunity 0@relapment The Developer shall be responsible for +alntaining guaranteed trees IS period. Apr lfor one until yeart after planting, the ewhichevere is later. 17. The Developer is responsible for meeting all condl- lions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision map Act, City Ordlanus, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all Improvements constructed thereunder Ma 76 until the Improvement Is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no Improvement securltrr provided hcrelnwith %hall be released before such.•a[ceptatce uniesf otherwise provided am authorized by the C1tJt COUncII cf the City. lac This agreement shall not terminate until the ealatenancer guarantee security hereinafter described has been rsleased by the City, er until a now agreement together with the requlred Improvement s.curlty has been submitted to the City by A successor to the here n named, and ndy resolution Of th ed City Council sale has beeft Improvement Security thtrefor accepted. his been releasedg 19. The impro -ement security to be furnished by the Developer JAIA h s form actept Ott by tee City Attorney foliorlrt9 and A;• To secure f t performance of this agreement. W 1 A bond o pr bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties n the loco and content n specified ly Government Code Sect loo 66499-1- he fa t 2 an Icoatedt not Security the City In the son and posit Specified by the money Attorney. 7. A, deposit with the City of oeeey for neSee" le bonds of u e tend approved for securing deposits of pttlic moults a to secure laborers Ind materlaiment 1 bond or bond% by On• or wore duly rthOrlted corporate Surat as In the fors and content specified by Gove•neent Code Section 66499 1. 2 and l content ,caent uad b Instrument the City Attorney. Y 0, A deposit with CI'y of money or negotiable bonds of the kind ap,r%red for securing C A cash deposit with the .Ity to guarantee Payment by the Gave loner to the a ylneer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the ot corner. nd ostreet Iettin of all boundary, tie notes to notes monuments City and The mount Aof q the center Am may be amy amount certified by the engineer Or surveyor as acceptable payment In full; or, If no value Is submitted, the cash bon, shad be of shown on the lonstructlon and Oond Lstieate contained herein Said cash deposit way be re'unded as soon as proce- dure Derml is after receipt by the city of the centerline t1a notes and written assurance of payment In full from the engineer or s rveyor, 0. the thereof tare eset bonds forth n P410 6 Ofr thlsp ts irecOtnt n 16. Tht 0er41oper warrants that the imP.Ovtments described+ In this agreement shall be free from del sets In mater Ulm 'add workmanship Any and all portions of the Isprove- nants foe - to be are c live •Ithin one (1) year fallout *1 the re0al rrdw orchrep NCed r by Devil oper cc a/ rent Of ballh chargesshit the uaraNtet seti curity In 6 Sum lequal to hall too percent (IOSI t0 the cconstruction a SL esmate or %200. . whichever Is greater. to secure the faith,ol performance of Dtvetoper.1 obllgat a as described In this per.'- , graph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the,. faith ul performance by the Dev /toper of army obligatlun of the -1- 77 Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenace acceptedn andasa amaintenancerguarantee securl• e h ssment f bas been Accepted by the City, the other Improvement Security described in this authorized by h thet released provided that Act such anJ r100111 Applicable rClty ordlaince 17. That the Developer Shalt tail out aid maintain such public liability and property damage Insurance tl Shall protect ofm and any contractor or subcontractor performing wort covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may to Ise t agreemen I the such operations 10 A ho:self for f under any contractor or subceetr.ctor, or aeyane d4, to fly or Indirectly employed by Said pe sons, even though such sauages be not Caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or liability and property edaage Ylnsgrinc@ shills lst the eClty las sddltoesl Insured and directly protect the City, Its officers, agents and employees. as well as the Developer, his contractors aduj 1. subcontractors, and all Insurance policies Issued her der shalt so State. The mini asaunts of such Inaurket she 1 be as fallow;! A , or' ) ys u prng d i joy death flab llt llmlts of net1 ess th In $100,000 for each person and $1,000,070 /af each accident or occurrence, and property des ^age liabil- ity limits of not less than $100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with in aggregate limit of tiani0 of for thec Developer another pe performance of ethe work wefn provided. 8 Automobile liability insurance covering all rehlcies"sed In the rerformance of this agreement raviding bodily Injury liability limits of not Ms than $200,000 For each person and 1100,000 for each accident or occurreass, and properly damage IfaD111tY limits of not less than $50,000 for each accident or occurrence. "fell an aggregate of not less than $100,000 which 427 a—Ise from the opera. tions of the Developer or his Contractor In performing the wort provided for herein. 18. That before the execution of this agreepent the 0eveleper shalt file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance Each such certificate shall bar An endorsement precludln9 the Cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any policy evidences the after c them City certificate, Dhavee recelvedf notification thirty by registered of mail from the insurance carrier As evidence of understanding the provisions contained heraln, and the I described Improvem•nte security,$ landA bsSUaffiae0 his slgnature hereto: J I FAlTHrOL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: S aH,000 Name and address of surely: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAIMENT Type: Principal Amount: S 170.700 Nwo and address of surety: CASII DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: $ 6,150 00 Name and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE r Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY Tilt CITY !N NES7 HEREOF, the parties herOtO have caused these VITpresents to be duly espcuteJ and acknowledged .Ith all formalities required by ia. on the dates Seim forth opposite their S i g natar s. In HATIONUIDE NITUDIX MORtGGE c:O.YI+LI A CALIIOANIA COAW .Devolope, Date •3- !� a/Q me0 .a c I. Vlca mmt ey rt Sid Jaaor�+/Naad. Ammamtmnt Secrei.1r Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla A Munlc To Corporation Sy: _, Mayor Attest: C It I, cr Approved: r ^•_ / %f{'- '(„t� ""' OCYELOPCR'S SIGNATURC MUST BE NOTARIZED 7,`F _S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 00. 10827 - 7 RNOU ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement Is side and entered Into, In conformance with the provisions of the Subdivislon Map Act of the State of CSIlfornla, and of the applicable Ordinances of the :Ity of 2anchm Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City. hereinafter referred to as the City, and First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITMESSETH: THAT, HHEPEAS. said Developer desires to develop certain real prop n•ty In said Cily as sheen on the conditionally approveJ subdiv/sioe enowm at Tract base 10,71.2; and MHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of sold su6ailex ton generally located between $formes& and Haven south y�T. Yfisod NOV. THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed by told City and v sold Developer as follows: 1 The Developer hereby Street to construct at Oe•n toper's mapenss all Improvements descelbed on Page 6 here- of within twelve months from the affectivr data herao/ 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be In default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an axten- Sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. l The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms harem/ Such request shall be submitted to the. City In writing not lets than 70 days before the expiration date hereof, and sball contain a statement of clrcaystances necessitating the extension of time The City shall have tl•e right to review the orovrslons of this Agreement, Including the construction standards, cost estimate, and Improvement security, and to require adjustments therein If any substanei I change has occurred during the term hereof. e. If the Developer falls or reelects to comply with the provisions of this • reeeent, the City that have the rfpht at any time to Cause said provisions to be gee by any laef v Reins, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and eapen+e Incurred S. The Developer shall provide watered water service to each lot of said development In accordance with the regulations. schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga Coun -y Mater District 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement. relocation, or removal of any Component of any Irrigation water system In conflict with construction of rnqufred Improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7 Improvements required to be constructed shall c/o Rolm Industries VLF I 6767 Mllshlre elyd., Ste. 670 nomonow. tis Angeles. CA AO16-2636 rm/CLERK 7 Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Sped an d u fltlons olf In the City, and to the laprovegent plan approved b) on Hle the office of the City CAR In ter Said Improvements are tabulated an the Construction and Bond Es- lmato. hereby incorporated on page 6 hereof. as taken Sena Inc improvement plans listed thereon by euaber. The Developer fha It also be responsible for cons trii - tion of any transitions or other Incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage correctedr upon camissicris direction discovered the City Engine ruttiRevised leers due to sale plan modifications (hall be covered the provisions of this IS and secured by the surety cot ng the original planned works. a. Construction permits shall .. •btained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer Ike to start of "art, all regulations listed thereon shall observed, with atten ion given to safety procedures, control dust, noise, or other +US once to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and city oegartments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. �J 9. The Developer shall be tee Onsille for removal of arose rocks and other debris from PUNIC rights -of -ray rN$lo or adjoining said development resulting from rorR relati-.e 'ta abid development. Ia. Mart done within existing streets shall be t omplet pursued all volt le the event unjustified delay the %hall have right to c e and c In ccepletlon, and to recover ail cost and expense Incurred from the Devalopor and /ar hlf contractor by army lawful means. It. Said 0evelolet shell at all times following dedlca. tick of the streets and easements in said subfdlvlsfan. up to the cceptetion and acceptance of said wort or Improvement by said Clt Council, give goad and adequate warning to the travel In pubic of each and every dangerous condition existent In said street or vestment, and rill protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Untlt the completion of all Improvements, herein Incorporated on page 6 , to be perforate, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shat: be under the charge of said Developer Said �eveloper,ny close all ar a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary street cloture permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made. 12. fiarkwa, trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Dev+Inptr after other Improvement war:, grading and cleanup has been completed. planting shall be done as provided by Drdlnante in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Devtlepment Director. The Developer 4ba!1 be responsible for maintaining all trees planted fn goad health until the end of the uaranteed maintenance per'ad, at for one year after planting, noPchaver Is later. 13 The Developer Is responsible for meeting all condl. dons established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Rap Oct, City ,rdiances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all Improvements constructed thereunder •2- U/ Pmamm� until the Improvement Is accepted for maintenance by the City, and e0 improvement security provided heraleulth shall be released before such acceptance unless otherrlse provided end authorized by the City Council of the City. 14 This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the city, or until A maw agreement together with the requlr*d Improvement security has bean submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named. and by resolution of the City Council time has boon accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released 15. The Improvement security to be furalsheJ by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be to a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized Iarporate sureties to the farm and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument In the fore one content specified by the City Attorney. J A, deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for secvW-1 g deposits of public nateri B. To secure IeDOrers and naterlalmen: 1. A band Or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the rare and content specified by Covernaent Code Section 66499 1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the form and content specified by the Clty Attorney y. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor rhos* certificate appears upon the Final MAP for the se ttlnqq of all boundary, lot earner, and street centerline •onuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The "aunt of the deposit may be any amoutit certified by the engineer or surveyor as Acceptable payment In full; or. If no value Is submitted, the cash band shall be as thorn on the Constructlo+ and Bond Estimate contained herein Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon 42 proce- dure permits after recelpt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment In full from the engineer or surveyor. 0 T regulred bonds and the principal amounts theha reof are let forth on page 6 of this agreement 16. The Developer warrants that the Improvements described In this agreement shall be free from defects in as terials and war' unship• Any Ann all portions of the Improve- ments found to be defective within one (1) year follarinp the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Devaloper free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or 6200.00, whichev.- is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obligations as described In this para- graph The mAlntenanC4 guarantee security shall also secure the faithful 9 r for by the Developer of any obligation of the 51! M&Intenencp atsesSNPRL ldistrict rl Onceh the e i prov! ents yhaver been by «the °Cand Y. atAel'tearteloproecmeatt security described aIn ethls aethorilt y b that )eased Subdivprovided sion °N that Act such and any« applicable otherwise ordinance. 17 That the Developer shall tale out and maintain Such public 11•balty and property damage Insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing wort covered by this agreement from claims for property damage$ whlCb may because &rise , f whether! operations the Such operatlons be by hiself or byn this any cant." or subcontractor. Or anyone directly or Indirectly Dyemployed rcgllgence r$ofs.tMetOereloper such or damages contnctoDr Cooled or 1l abl lltazand property anyone employed yInsurance{ Shills list the.City public additonat Insured and directly protect the City. Its officers. agents and employees. of ball As the Der. toper, his contractors and D]s subcontractors, and alt Insurance policies Issued he hi71al3 sr shalt So state The minimum an vats of such lasurapce she Da as ratio-%: 'IDS7 A. injury[ oar deathtliability limits ofvDot ass the $T 00,000 for each person and 11,000,000 for each accident itsrofcnatr l assn than property 1000 qforaeachl acci- dent or occurrence with an a11gqgregate limit of tions of for thee Developerehin say hen rerfermance of .the wort heroin provided. D Automobile liability Insurance covering all vehicles -us ad In the performance of this agreement 9101111", bodily Injury liability limits of not I'll han 1200,000 for each person and 1700,000 for each liability accident limits, of occurrence. s than SSqO property 0 o damage accident o :100,000 which may erlse aggregate the opera- tions of the OeVCIOPtr or his Contractor In performing the wort provided for heroin 18. That before the eascutton of this agreement, the of l nfurance ilcoveriag with the specifiecertificate Insurance or «Eacghlcsuch the cortifirate cancellations, shall reduction le coverage of tan. policy °ere dances the after such the! Cityl!Shall before recalled notification thirty (30 das sell from the Insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained baraln, and with as following ietcrlEeE loprorosentt se«•Dty.1dand h hats "arflsed his s l gnat.,. hereto. .a. 0 N rAITura rorONIIANCE Type: Principal Amount: 1 4:0.000 name and address or surety: MATERIAL AND LARDT PAS:ICNT Type: Principal Amount: S I'0.nro Name and address of Surety: CASII OEPOSIT MONUMCNTATION Type: Princlnal Amount: S S.000 00 Nano and address of surciy: v„r MAINTENIMCE CUARANPE 1;7 Type:: Principal Amount: MIA Name and 4dd•en Of surety: TO VE rOSIED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE 81 TOC CI71 la 4ITNCSI IIENCOr, the parties neroto have cautcd these presents o be duly eaecuteJ and actnorledged ulth all formalltle• redulrrd by tam on the dAtes set forth opposite their tlgmalurea in NATIOM151 NCTVO" NONT=f C411AAT A W IfOMIA r01POIlATIOa ,Dev.toper en � a • cep 1 Viea Pca• dan' �i ..na ad. Ammtstent Racntary City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corparatlon 0j: , Mayor Attest: illy l crr /��/�yT'S -1 Approved: 44e, ..y�. DEVELOPER'S SICOhTURE MUST BE NOTARIIE, g, _S. i y x1 �� JST NATIONWIDE SAVINGS April 2, 1986 City of Rancho Lucamonga 9320 Bass Line, Suite "C" Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Reference: Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number: 695 - S Tract Number: 10827 - 3 Faithful Perform nee Gentlemen: At the request and for the account of First Nationwide Network mortgage Co,pauy, we hereby establish In your favor our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 695 - S in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO CENTS (S620.cnn_nn) This Irrevocable Latter of Cradit is available against your Sight Drafts drawn on Firs: Nationwide Savings and accompanied by your Lett, certifying that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is entitled under its Agreement with First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, relating to Tract Number 10827 - 3 . Said Certification shall be final and binding on the right of the CSty of Rancho Cucamonga to so draw. The amount available under this Irrevocable Letter of Crvdlt Number 695 - S will be reduced from time to time to the extent of Payment of your Drafts or upon your written authority drawn hereunder and up-in y,ur request, upon re- ceiving from you a Letter certifying the amount by which this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 695 - S is to be reduced, and the amount that will be avallable hereunder after such reduction This Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 695 - S expires oa April 7, 1986 In the United Stater of America. We hereby undertake that your Drafts when drawn under the terns and conditions of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be duty honored by us upon presentation Please ensure that all Drafts case a reference to our Irrevocable Latter of Credit Number 695 -S Respectfully Subm:.ted, L�SI NATIONWIDE SAVING A Federal Savings and Loan Association JEANI E REED, ASSISTM7 SECRETARY gS x 1ST NATIONWIDE SAVINGS April 2, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Brae Line, Suite "C" Rancho Cucaconga, California 91701 Reference: Irrevocable Letter of Ct.dlt Number: 698 -5 Tract Number: 10827 - 3 Labor and Materiels Gentlemen: At the request and for the account of First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 698 -5 in the amount of 7VO HUNDRED TEN INOUSMiD DOLLARS AND NO CENTS (5230,000.00) This Irrevocable Letter of Credit Is available against your Sight Drafts draw on First Nationw.de Savings and accompanied by your Letter certifying thct the City of Rancho Cucamonga _Ss entitled under its Agreement with First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, relating to Tract Number 10821 - Said Certification shall be final and binding on the right at the City of Rancho Cucamonga to so draw. The amount available under this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 698 -5 will be reduced from time to time to the extent of payment of your drafts or upon your written authority draw hereunder and upon your request, upon receiving from you a Letter certifying the amount by which this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 698 -5 Is to be reduced, and the amount that will be available here- under after such reduction. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 698 -5 expires on April 7. 1988 in the United State, of America. We hereby undertake that your drafts when drawn under the terns and conditions of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit will by duly honored by t• upon presentation. Please ensure that all Drafts bear a reference to our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 698 -5 Respectfully Submlt.ed, SI NATIONVIDE S,V :!,4' , A Federal Savings and Loan Association i S J I. VICE PRESIDENT /Lrrrl .IE`.\. REED, ASSISTANT SECRETARY 1ST NATIONWIDE SAVINGS April 2, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line, Suite "C" Rancho Cucamongas California 91701 Reference: Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number: 694 -S Tract Number: 10827 - 2 Faithful Performance Gentlemen: At the request and for the account of First Nationwide Network mortgage Company, we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number in the amount of SIX HUNDRED oIXTY ONE THOUSAND DOLLAP-9 AND NO CEUTS $661.000.00) °Lr 'c1hp This Irrevocable Letter of Credit is available against your Sight Drafts drawn on First Nationwide Saving@ sad accompanied by your Letter certifying that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is entitled under its Agreement with First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, relating to Tract Number 10827 - 2 . Said Certification shall be final and binding on the right of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to so draw. The mount available under this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 694 -S will be reduced from time to r me to the extent of payment of your Drafts or upon your written authority drawn hereunder and upon your toquest, upon re- ceiving from you a Letter certifying the amount by which Chia Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 694 -S is to be reduced. and the mount that will be available hereunder after such reduction. This Irrevocahle Letter of Credit Number_ 694 -S expires on April 7. 1989 United States of America. We hereby undertake that your Drafts when drawn under the terns and conditions of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit vil- be duly honored by us upon presentation Please ensure that all Drafts bear a referents to our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 694 -S Respectfully Submitted, FIRST NATIONWIDE SAV NG , A Federal Savings and Loan Association -7 n O 97 fro each 8"Uh a caa«.n tee apes CA a0043 Tewpfgne TO a2 -0200 ;r 1ST NATIONWIDE SAVINGS April 2, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line, Suite 'L" Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Reference: Irrevocable Letter of CradiL Number: 697 -S Tract Number: 10827 - 2 Labor and Materials Centlemen: At the requer, and for the account of First Nationwide Network Mortgage Company, we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number —697 -5 in the amount of THREE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($330,500.00) This Irrevocable Letter of-Yredit is available against your Sight Drafts drawn 3''r on First Nationwide Savings and accompanied by your Letter certifying that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Is entitled under its Agreement with First Nationwide Network Mortgage Cumpany, relating to Tract Number 10817 - - . Said Cart- flcation shall be final and binding on the right of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to so draw. The amount available under this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 697 -9 will be reduced from time to time to the extent of payment of your draft& or upon your written authority draw hereunder and upon your request, upon receiving from you a Letter certifying the amount by which this Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 697 -S is to be reduced, and the amount that will be available here- under Mar xueh reduction. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 697 -S expires on April 7, 1988 in the United Scarra of America. We hereby undertake that your drafts when draw under the termo and conditions of this Irrevo..tble Letter of Credit will by duly honored by us upon prasentatiou. Please ensure that ..11 O.afta bear a reference to our Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 697 -S Submitted Federal Savings and Loan Association 06 oeao eowe a.wMa eaa.wa 1me N'O.waLa mama r.avMr ai a.:�o:ro SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. C Box 807 lasted Cucamonga, Callfornta 91710 Gdntleseo: Pursuant to Chapter 4. Article 9e section 66497 of the Gorarament Code, the undersigned oerel,y ayrest teat all monuments shown on the find nap of Tract No. JOSE -2 are to of set and furaisbec by •z engineer or surveyor on or before g-1 -es the subdirldsrsDedfiad la the Engineer's or Surveyor's Certificate :u dad 9 ads to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified fa S•ctIon 66097, of the Government Code The undersigned bands you Wealth the sum of f 6,150.00 as a crsh deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will be act and the notes furnished as above provided on or Lfqr�l ha Cott SPaclfled and that the amglneer Or surveyor w4; be D,�Jm by the uedertlgaed. It is further understood and agreed that fe the event the undersigned falls to ccaDl111 the above requirements within the time spe•ifhd, tee City of Rancho Cutaaoega Is autaorite0 to complete u10 nqulr ;meets or cause them to ha comps eted ass the cast the "eo Is Le oe a charge ,galntt so d cash deposit, :aa the City of ancho Cursmpnga 1s authorized to make the necessary tree _�r true said cash daDOflt to the credit for the proper city Iona \ It It further a9nec that If the alders /pled dohs not present t surveyor to the City Cauadl that has hear the an9laemr or naid a surveyor for the attlay of the final manages i and If the fagineer or surveyor gives the music's prescribed In Section 06447 of the government Cede, the City aball Pay to said engineer or surveyor, the Cash San, II; berei n made, If tee cast Of CONPleting said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned a Gas to Pay the difference within thirty (30) days alter receiving written statement from y the City Of Reach* Cue %mange specifying the amount of the •• ' di •ferearm between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements. �• "' Cordially, • 1ST NATIONWIDE pt•WORK NOT=a COMPANY Subdivider 9 p va .�ne ,agelae. WIfOrnia 90045 Address Rt, ,7 �Lant i •q c C a m ens • •" "ad, Secretary Oa _ �/ ry be deposits" Of retard (far return of any portion of the Cash deposit) shall be 1ST NATIOnTIiNE NETWORK MDRTGAOE COMPANY, 9800 So. S4Palveda.E4a Angeles, (mine ) (Addrefs 90045 NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED s` f RESOLUTION NO. .EG4 R 0(0 9 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 10027 - 2 AND 3 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 10927 - 2 and 3 consisting of 321 lots, submitted by Relco Industries, Subdivider, located between Hermosa and Haven Avenues, south of Wilson Avenue, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Hap Acct of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Nap of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvemer.. Ag- eement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Nap offering for dedication For public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as goad and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the F;.-,al Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: HOES: ABSENT: wing, or %d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs. City Engineer SUBJECT Release of Bonds and ' lotice of Completion A Z ivn I Tracts Nos. 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046 - located in the Victoria Planned Coamunity DEVELOPER: The William Lyon Co. 8540 Archibald Avenue, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept, Maintenance Bond Street - Tr. 11934 $33.800.00 Maintenance Bond Street - Tr. 12044 $370,000.00 Maintenance Bond Landscape - Tr. 12044) $140,000.00 Maintenance Bond Street - Tr. 12045) $64,200.00 Maintenance Bond Landscape - Tr. 12045) $50.000.00 Maintenance Bond Street - Tr. 12046) $53,600.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond Street - Tr. 11934) $338,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond Street - Tr. 12044) $3.700,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond tLandscape - Tr. 12044)$1,400,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond jStreet - Tr. 12045) $642,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond Landscape - Tr. 12045) $500,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond Street - Tr. 12046) $536,000.00 The street and landscape improvements for Tracts Nos. 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046 have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans and it is recommended that Council accept the improvements, accept the Maintenance Bonds, adapt the attached resolution authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds listed above. Respe tfully Submi ed. LBH ✓H:bN 1/ l RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RAN" COCARONSA P. 0. Bon 807 Rancho Cucasanga, California 91770 160 RECORDW Kull TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LAYCND CLGVekGA P. 0. Bon 607 Rancho Cucason9s. California 91170 NOTICE OF ANVLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVER THAT: 1. The undersigned Is An otter of an interest or auto to the henlnafter described real property, the nature of welch Interest or nut* Is: �y onyx Tracts Un. 11934, 120x, 12045, and 12016 2. The full ware end address of the undersigned owner u: CITY OF RANCND CUCWYOIW. 972D•C Base Line pad, P. 0. Boa 807, Rancho Cucuonga, California 91770. 7. On the 16th day of April. 1986, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the wM of I"weaant son forth in to contract docunnts for. Tracts Nn. 11934. LZU4, 1204S and 12076 4. The news of the urlgiasl contractor for the wort: of improvement at a whole pe: The N177iaa Lynn Company S. its roal property referred to herein 13 sltated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardlm, California. and 1s detcrlMa as fol lon: Tracts Nes. 11934, 12064, 1204S and Iia6 The street amass of sale property is N/A. CITY OF iJAM CUCA7aww, a suniclpal arporatlan, Owner y 7� Bond No 111 1330 Prantum tntladed in rh'ra. for irrtornnc�i mm .— IUIWTLWAHCC BOND KNOW ALL HER BY TMPSB PRTSEWTSI That The William Lyon Company, as Principal, and The Marinas Insurance Company, Incorporated under the laws of the State of Now Jersey, and authc•taed to erecuto bonds as Suraty, ace bold and firmly bound Into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, state of California, in the em of shim M.. tho ..nd L.ht hashed am .a /100 dollars (S D.eoc.00 I Lawful money of the United statoe of America, tot the payment at Valch am. well and truly to be made to said City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Princi- pal anGSarnc' /. bind thems.lvea. their administrators, successors -iT- and assigns, jointly and •ae,cnlly, firmly by these presents, The condition of the obligating is much, that where.*. an or about may 1S. %SRI , The Willi" Lyon Company, as developer engaged into an agreement for VLCWrla wiadta.. - tract 11934' . Rancho Cucamonga, California fog the em of d 133.001.00 , and whore,&, under the term of the aggemeot The WIIIIM Lyon Company is required to give bond for R 33.300.00 to Insure the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the developer agrees to repair and maintain said improvements In good condition and in accordance with city specifications for :no year attar acceptance of said improvm.nts. Now thatefore, it aid developer shall for ♦ period of and year from and otter the data of acceptance of improvements bl said City of Rancho Cucamonga repair and maintain said improvementse than the obligation to be void, otherwise to remain in Lull force and effect. PRIWCIPALI SORM, THE w)3 ttos R¢Pn /ff Jana Tlca•pro Nest The YI111aeWdon Company t7.3 ?BY AWEAICAN IWSORMCR Co"MT Patricia areLawm. Attareer -La -Fact X IANTV TtM AMERICAN INSURANCECOMPANY Jw ALL MEN BY TWESEPRESENRrTWTHC AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. A Cwreraloe /J brpruAWraiutia adntk /pt of IA[ Sore d Nee ltrwy. W M.Br ne pratWl Mee b W Cdy W Ceamey d Sea Fnen.c. CJfow. Rn wWr. f Svsvv / ad ro/. W dwe 61 thew peered Wa. aaeneete W aptrrtu — PATRICIA IALENIR ---- W nor W Yoful Anw wYSS4 .irt wM full ►owe od atAAan1 ►enby ladund b as,vm. rlur ad atd. N evulbe. Na4 rlrwk /w IPA ibtn os/ W a0 bW u. u.denWrrp. nrapnueoa w rbn cameo atlptmt m Ik aowr these! �----- ��.�.�o�� - -.» W r bid Ik Car -kt "%tk nrPaew rot of IL Corpora W O y utnrN 17 at Snnttrl• bmby mdyma W taaarwrµ ap Wt Ik tad MtarytNr►iM n7 b h tit prmrwt Tbn pae'a of rebury, Is paewd pruwwat r Anrtlt Vlll. Steers 70 W 11 of 914an of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ebb is 14 fair W efe0. - ArodeYW .AlPeiarrWAoWrfryAU®uoeain. WAOraeris/iaRMAjre romp /Le/ollewrrWralrAPpnbtm. ladae 70. APMbawt. The CLLbun of W Rout of Dire re. IM Prrldn4 any VbPraWat or 827 rbn pre uOw4ed h W lard of Deatlora, W Nuru of W a t sa of s IN ud W Prsdol w aa/ ontio sed A ray. her tot to gyre, appowt RnMlal Aawuea Sreturrn Iw Anarer ctur i at r nprNat W a� fr W a Itb.lf of the CarPantb W Anew r roar IrJ Proint os/ tale orpanaer for W r brLalf oI W Crapentre. itwa 71, Anbse Tl. Tit Authority of or! Rudest Aakuat Samrrka. Attanw>,I►F n W About tha0 k AS frewnitd Y W Iateeen 1 "Wens Show appobant. W ul out tppebarr W an LUAWN, poste/ thntby ray be "Wild as osl me by tit Roud of Duenne n b th any pare nrrrtd n Seel, eel apporanL- TM So w d Anne! It sirwd and Noted under W by tit outbbrnY of tit fond ing Revelao rt dbptd by ISO Nowd of Doman d THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY u • ex.ma 0.11 o0d W btM oA W MI, ay Of Srpnkr. Nth. W trd Atmi ns Mt eae ben aweMed r npaakd RESOLVED. drat the ter ulen of uy Ytn•hr clot. AWMIyy W� Sentury. "d RnWm Attivam Seintarl of 1M Corp.,%, r W the wd eCJka Cbrpwurob etel be anted Or pmnd a ant per d omrn)ra ail rt.x sum of ant p 11 W attmrl• N a eel tmrArut nbtma tknw -y fuumde ad and pe.erdsimnel uLrr.KJre cfu /pontdntareey.wnlu6tue kuma ntA youth rltWwunwfruask Nr WDk turd W ",A, upa uk Corpcww a 1N WIMESS WHEREOF. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ba awaA them prsNre r be ward by k1 Vnnheu4r. W btwpwarratot r be ,nests afftead" 26th �67W Septerther t1 2 Fr . THEAb1ERiCAN INSURANCE COMPANY RTATE Of CALITMNIA, j NDCOINTYOFSA.NF1RAVCrW0 `. SO rt Ifilliaa, 1N WITNESS wHEREOF.Ike" bunrrd ar my bard W oRad myttMJrJ.tk day an! you bntw kit abme •rinm OFFICIAL SEAL 10 Q SUSIE K GUERT mil-• - �` ROT4r IIITX • R ato 011 a I.J p Sos rrtata e r YI (w.�utw leMtMw II IM CERTIFICATE ITATEOFCLLOORMA. am A10 COUNTY a SAW nANCUCD Ja 1. tit WeJFad, Rtdor A1111=1 Secrrtery of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a NEW JERSEY Cwroo guoL DO HEREll RR• 7DY We tit fwnoel ad auukd POY.ER OF ATTORNEY more, b 9.0 twee W Seoul brie nretd. W hnenrwr Ikt Anek %IH. Sn Wu b) W 11 dW aide•, N W CwPwuaw, W tbt RnebrrAOl ek Nord al DveOOn.wt forte w W Pooh "1 AetNaey. art tee• w fwer. tireaJWrWUWCRIad Cau7d SY iraoraa.Dwd the 16th dayef January 19 66 1 L�• • Mite Atrtaw Irmert iRJ4TA�Ri1 �� .. Bond No. dll 2431 Premium included le [sere. for Prr YtYACe hAINLTNANCC BOND SHOW ALL HER BY TNRSR PRzsrns, That The William Lyon Cospseyt as Principal, and The American Insurance Company. Incorporated under the lava of the State of mew Jersey, and authorized to *scum bonds as Sucety, are held and firmly bound Into the City of Poncho Cucaon9a, A municipal corporation. State of California, In the am of ma hundred forty thcuaad and WIOD dol3ua• - -� -- Id 14O.ddm.00 1 Lawful money of the United States of America, for the Payment of which am, well and truly to be made to cold City of Poncho Cucamonga, State of California, and Prinel- Pot aVurety, bind thouselves, their administrators, sucseaof1Fj Ind assigns. jointly and severally, firmly by these preseatst The condition of the obligation is such, that wheseer* oD The Ntlliam Lyon Company, as :envelope[ entered into an agreement for 'has 12044 . Rancho Cucamonga, California for the am of d 1.4W•M•d , and whereas, oiler the tares of the 19reameet The William Lyon Company Is [*gutted to give bond foe d 14o.M.w — to Inputs the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the developer agrees to repair and maintain maid improvements In good condition and In accordance with city specifications for ono Yost afttr accmptaocs of amid improvement.. Nov therefore, If said developer aball for a period of one year free and after the date of acceptance of Improvements by aald City of Rancho Cucamongo repair and maintain said Improvements, then the obligation to be void, othervlae to Tens In In full force and effect PRINCIPAL, MOM, TNR ANRRIC" IBSORANCB CoN►An -- Jrc1111W1�yyon Vic. !dent acs c arvtmar, arrormry -to r ci "M AMERICAN INSURANCE CO,MP'Ahy Atli MEN Rr TusE ►RE4LNM An W Suitor Nr• IImY. W kriy .1 THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. • Corianla dY wPpnd aid t.fuu.5.•Kttk .1.d. W Net y IAtK Preteen rrla. aunno W �ed ue Cu) W Can) d SY FlYe1MO. CYdetdu. W .r.M. tonnnuW add -- -PATRIC.TA VMXM. —^ _ b k W mod Q "6. wadina", .(d f.0 p•w St Sib" — kre tramY)WO,7IWI.WnIAtmp , ttt yeeNemdnatouaPiaWIW .MeMMt.MY.KIro•kd aN oa+tuAalw NRrr •r.Md ealWnwt to lot .K.R tAnnf.�. �.�... M W "it 1.n Wnb).tfWhoYdd lam) fairV,NiNwcLlar90114101 .i IWlrWR1$ywFm My do aler.IiNs INtM �IpnC. FYI nIfntC 07111 S.mW C-41-04 90 Yd AtIw.tFrIhFFIn M)MKY<FryyN) fac WA rNutat,a7i`a.NdPurolrnY Mdk VIII. SrnioeSW71NS,i•aN THE AMERICAN INSURANCE iOMPAN7 rw m1.0 fate W eam. "Ands VU f.A/AwiaaIANAl"*Aanool.a.o dAtuvg4.r dAEr.O 1.aW C'i.IPJawt WMRI t A/prYrn. Nn1w 70, AP.aiaaL Tae CSaattao of jr, awd of Djwii , IN R.NnL YI Vi�►rWnt It Y7 Oder ►IIIN otitwk,d 47 dt Board of Dm°n. W Cb`u of W Sand N Dfwten, W rm"I w u, ""todn4 My' Do d tat w dot, aapul Rt1dm A&.Yua, Slvounn lo AMrw)•iJKt M trPlsroo, "it M lot y bobu f .f W Cor►ronoo W Aanu u aMN tatl Syww1 W yule MMUatm for W Y WAnan [p►woua WiVw 71. AoIANe,. The A.IRway of od latInt Ant"", Sam.rin. An.rp).Ar►ott, W Afnu WD M n otrMrAM loth, f.tmnot Wv Ypkan4 W u) nn a,,..an1 W on "than ruled Limo, a.7 be unto. or YS Ire y W Wn of Duncan a by a, porNe��P..wM 0 wall soth ypiOn4^ is A FIIICAINSURANCE COwtANY u W ~ a° °°d0� °S W S°[b`fu R*wtnwn WFSre y W RaN .: 0.emn of TN[ aNnlyd w ft7Mlyd. ponua Sid) t,W1 W MIS a 1k nM M, of StrmOot. IIY. W Yr Re Wt,ed tad 'RESOLVED W1 W std w N.d) Yae Rn �.t 1dMINfN 4nnory. W Resided, An(uon SIMty of lle Cwpnsoe. ° W tk war i1'dn CttPrcuw wal KaSltHw ryuM Odu 1 aY >rc.anwdNY W oM Oe) p•n of utarvl cal rnau000 of u) pier ad nutet /. w tm11°iu kn K Onome /. a to cal ctrudcnr nlwry tkme y a`•dW opo W Ea.pnlp. .aY t1Na fKtuuk Wnutue w f.cN.We KY>.+.a h IN WITNESS AAEREOF. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY hat cau d Ww Pme.,t M IS by y to Vr., RnukN. aYWsa.aue..lu MlrreVau straw this 26th dgef Sapt.�er It 03 THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY RY STATE OF CALMW"rA. CMANDCOMMOIFS0111ANCSSCO w' N_.V' ftfortne►wwual nrN Richard Nlllla Lunn.M.e IY•q •Po. Ku5 b wI dYY nwe, did dra°M aW wr W1 of q p,rtbrw of THE AMERICAN Iy7UMN[E EDnPA \I ,k Cot deN Atd q W •aK4 estewed W ob a wnn.rd4 ,At1 k Iu•r ul MY of Mb Ce ee caw W 1 Ik ual .Ilan to sk Mb nunnn trelawprue NY. W1.•u wNWN y pdfr el W RYrd NOnmMofub Cwp,u,d W I ncakyW W u y ntlltttto Lte wow M RTTNE35 MHEREOi.I Mw 4+dnw Mt e7 Wd W oRed�) eEkMIMY. W 4Y W )an W k Rmo1o•tninm wMEEJAL EAT lC' -tJ IIOTYT MUC. GM7DEIll an a f,0.r« Y°..Mo IwcM)0 —' CERTIFICATE STATEDTCIIDORNIA. CTRAMCOUld"DTSANEIANCISCO I' W ••KrYfoW. RftWm A u,m St u,,f ME AMERICA' INSURANCE COMPANY.. NEW JERSEY Cwpm(en. DO NERSe1 ClR. 7UY ail W fp au been, to fa fares W b•,)OWIINWS)yu /W Coryon,rto,W WReWO,m sIWRa,blOu 4t °Ola�rnelyd,Wfmnnspr dal Anek SIII. Sn enwt,w fen4 to W ►dies NA,twa).arcan r fpn. Se..lW t�Mu WCI,7W COrary sftu►r.K4a.D1udW 16th MEN January 86 0. 0057 to - 96 Bond no. »g fate _ Premium 1.1w" la cba's to, prTo..u.c:'zrw MAINTENANCE 8040 KNOW ALL MEN BY TMLSE PRESENTS, That The William Lyon Company, •, Principal, and The American Ioautance Company, Incorporated under the lave of the State of NOW Jersey, And authorised to execute hands as Surety, to held and fltaly bound into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, State of Caltfocnla, in the sum of rift, theuasad " m /loo dollars gS0•000•00 I Lawful money of the United State, at Ar CICl, for the payment of which sus, Well and truly to be made to Bald City of Rancho Cucamonga, State at California, and princl- q'I' 77 Bmrety, bind themselves* their administrators, suetesaut� and ass''Igos, 7oimtly and severally, 'Icmly by these presenter The condition of the abllgatica /s such, that uhacesa, on or about Mal le. ital , The William LYOC Company, as developer entered Into an agreement for Tvsct 120,1 Ramcbo Cucamonga, California for the sum of S Soo.t00,W , and Whereas, under the terms of the agreement The William Lyon Cempanl is coquited to give bond foc d lu.om.m to lnsuce the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the developer agcesa to repair add maintain sold Improvements In good condition and In accordance With city ,peciticatiocs tot one year after accePtsoce of said lmprovesents. NOW therefore, it amid developer shall .at a petioa of one year from add after the date of aceePLance of Improvements by said City of Rancho Cucamonga repair and maintain said leprov..t,, than the obligation to be ,old, otherutes to remain In full tame and effect. PRINCIPAL, SuRR`T, THE WILLIAM 4oa t Aas THE AMBRtCAN IM$ORANCR COMPANY Jeer P, fifty. vlcs- %Rridz I err vAa re r. cmtwr- The Yll ilex Lyon lotpA" / 7!¢ AMMUCAN MSURAN CE CO.NPANY AL IR1tr1®t I.tAY1L iYTY[ AYIIK.Y YtU4KS fOLr.n . C...r M.s.+Irlltll rnr r!w w YI. Yrvl. w Y.w n w..r yn. r Cq r CrI N L Inw\ <Ww.., W r. art r IKr W YIYI wIYO ry.e..ry1.. Ywr \r /YwNrWa1 MtM AwrrwY..1 Wl.tlrrwlY ►w1 .\.r..1....s. r.N4w =r r.. n r r •I.I\.wY..1.. wlr..e. w 11.. w� I.P� . r rn r.r • r.ur r�,...rrn..w.Wrrr.n...Iwrrwrw ..r.rrlw�.iir �olyrYrr [ p:I.,w.l Y,.rwl.yrs►.yJUrwn..lrrin . rlr.r....n. f.v wYJr6 r\Ir[I+�IrrrY YUtisarllr.Nwrra ul[ucul wuuKCNYrA.f �..0 •. w. m�. rr.. N�vA .+....IwrArwrinr.r....�r+.rn.r rYJ..Y�„r rrs ..Y+rn1•ar...Yrrlrr.�..rrr.rA Y. r\.w.r.N.w Y�.....r rwNY r.IR Y RNY r r rM Y GI.rY. r I�Ir p Yf Y1'Ihw.. Y6 r...1 Y IYN• r...l [rr yl.Iw ygWY r AY.w.IM.I.yN W b r r r W/ JYC�..r W I.r..T \W [r..1 r WIY/IUwm (w r Y WOJrC.lsw rr.wY.1 NwJ rN� YINw Inlra.wl.Mlr W yIw IW r N /wn\N Y r r�� r. W r.111wrI.s W Y•Wlq wwN ►.N1.11Yw.YJ wN)1.1rr WN Nrv1w y .NItlY11Ny YnOtY[0 Owr yr.IJw• Ma•\IJN. rlr1. ylwrr.r Cly.,W,wr (IIIIUI rr [...... r r wYr CYII� W Y IYM. MIwN1 r•w r M�..11 �NI..r � w MI IwO Jar\ . wM IIW� IIwIF.WY I'IAY NYrC.1.r.�•rwa Nwl /w. Yr.w1 r rW I. YAW 4n+Y YIrIw w W �Y vY W M Y r1i W I \Mnlp. T11[ AY [LCAM p{I'4Yn (pYnMY W rr rw wII� N Y �1 r r Yr�11..., rr�.nr.rr.�Yerr ![tA rM •i.ps0llC Ir \I rv� n1I.YRKw 41 M w 27 &x a v9 s 1 C RARYCnaa\ mr..ro coAYR n s.\ n.•cuv Y. IIIWf .MnLW.IMrwr.wFlrrICW.1•r.INrYr1 W 1s1111.YYYw1.r1\ wau c [o[nt mnscuaa.Y., anwcaaoTauYnuom � 4o mr �rwilMw �i �w.iloiu r•K �N wtt•nYlYlwwOO YI.nI R1. .yr�.. r�eliw iww IY.O W 11Yr Irar.rYrC.r...rr.ry Yr WNN}aNr.YlrN.rlwWY �.rr..Iws,� r' lYr Xr OIWCrprr.I..NSYrr Ieen Mr J .s. et Ire.• .IIYT..CI I Bond No. ill 2433 p[emlm Included teerlutye for NAINTCN —AN!� E X" _ pt oMm. mr [NON ALL MEN ST TREES PRESENTSt That The William Lyon Ccnpa ry, as Principal, and The American Insurance Cmpany, incorporated under the lava of the State of New Oeravy, and authorized to ,,"to bonds as Surety, are hold and firmly bound Into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, e municipal eorriz,ty W,• State of Cal /fornla, In the am of slaty faer tlmuaaM r— hm+ared and ro/19a doll•ra- �S N.2oo =i Lawful money of the United State, of Moritz. for no payeant of which am, Well and truly to be mad to said City of RancAO Cucamonga, State of Cali[o[ela, and Princl- PSI aaA Surety, blp theeaelves, their adwinlstraters, successors and ajjignb jalnely anS awerslly, fl rely by thou Drepnbt N - The condlti,. of the obligation lm such, that whereas, en or about Rz, 25. laal The William Lyon Cempeoy, as developer entered into an agteaw,ot for Trarr 110`1 —A Rancho Cucaonga, Col•torn m la for the a of s e42.000 GO m m , cad whereas, uo•e, the terms of the 099ea2ent The William Lyon Company is reggt[ed to give bond for a a.lool +� to lauce the City of Manche Cucuonga that the developer agraas to cepslr and O"Atalo Sold Improvements In good Condition and In attotdanm with city specification, for On' year after acceptant, of said Lproveaeam. Nov therefore, if Sold developer Shalt for a period of a" year from and after the date of acceptance of tmprovoenta by said City of Rancho Cutamonq, repair and malotaln gold laproveagots, than the obligation to be veld, otherwise to rush In full force and effect PRINCIPAL, 6N =LTT, T6 YI WAR % ON m,vAly .) TNL ANERICAw INSURANCE CONpAwr JJOeS IIIAN I. Aa11gy, TIC � n[ vvicl. arebnrr, Aemteay a' -rout 1 Nil lia tr2n f •p l�r 41L . . vex .I z AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY /Y.�N *fie Stu i d N linty �TM hTME AMERICAN M311RANCE COMPANY. a Corpatq 4*1 mpand W ea:eeia wan W aaemnat. W dma y Wr Inrra W t. owuneY WI � tk CAy M CMrt d Su i.unne. CWdmmr hat mYS. unuwe W -- PATRICIA 1REDNER -.� k err W YrfW AnorrNtl•m.rw vM fall I~ and "*miry kreet adernd i In w.w. fkn W amd. ta ttaarN. mu, ectao.kap W rat' my W W be".. W "up. Ntaaauaemt a ourn name o4armat m aka aurae *end �— ^�� - -- rnkmNadek rq etteeitaafaElWrour uem Meru NWaY evert. Wenaf•Mytk Prn.d. r.owkd oi►Ite Trt taatt d tW! eneur0 ►t u 3rvrury. kny nuftmt W ttMrmn� W rtu W tad AtbseNwaFul wrF ie i. *e�x list t4 fate tat enm.ry k DuW PueumPt m Avek VIII. Snots 30"a 31 d Sri" d ME AMERICAN INSURANCE COM►ANY oon v f.R "Aleut YW„tf feywmf W ANa"Amieutep iy WAIzwmPy,ian WArrO mam fr /�.rryay W Nel1A fpterr, leY+a 7f, ANakwrt. Tlr Ctatraaa sf W Gaut d Ulrmreea. ek PtaYnt, or roPlwtet a of •*t' ft'taa atWtuN by W Mad of J>raimt. W Cturmu al W a•u5 of Deawl, rd Aamat.led.n m npmne W on fa W w W k hWrnk oaf t at "C Co aYtnaadma haAy mt. hM 11mt m se, 4#90-1 2"MI Aamu Sv at er Cew. W lna a rP1 M u af a u Ia W w kAd No, cm, Saran, 31, Anbodr The A• *ait of w* R'Wm Aauaue Seannlirr. Anm"Y"2N4M W Apu1 Wa be u Wmi rd Ie mr iremm�t im,al —J am- 4TOmrmnt. W tar use APPOnwrr W on "116111, pyld *veer met k "Ime M aka ame " W {out d Damon a y wI puma apwnd le mate ru►aFpbwm'• Tn Dpee�.e. d enermT h Ward aW taakd Wt' W y W avocrM d W ran Rtadrma stood y t4 Rm.t d Deeeera d THE A4LRIEAN��d ANCE COMPANY of o mtrmr duff ta0d W k4 w the S!* 4) d Sgnakr. Itw. W tank RtmWeq ka m kerr notated m - RESOLVED tAu W ururmr dset V. pftudtat.Ay�tRu Ca.pmuq eta /kamadmprodntaefat'dutwa / f'w ekryrna Wuw a• Rniutu Srnerory deM Co.ponrm WWNsl N11n hrwW: aW aq perndWianel aar n•xarardut p.+rdumret a /Ferdremr /.awake «rafeut muuw lkme 4,14 and reday a fva W C !. neuAtt'e k M ra'a" a. • ante seta t"mook tarrt'w a faetreuk MM WU h M MTTNLSS WHEREOF. THE AMERIC AN INSURANC E COMPANY W eaaua tku ptuua ot IN Wand y as Va ftkk el. Wastkm nmatel•a k krnamotraw am 76th atrol Septe=ber L3 If —� , ����t�yc±�R/'� THE ooAMERICAN INSU�RA{NCCE'1Ct1O1MPANNY , rw� By ��LLL47C W UT^'� STATE OF CAIIIORNIA. a CfTYAmCOINTYOFSANmAVCTSCO m• Oa*a 26th 4j of Septenher t!3 IU1cMrd Yilllan m ew Monaa.aeo. eta.. e......a..... .- (f - -. Yel" aNmeaau6t.... Mar;E" WHEREOF. Ik•sM"uo 4t mY tnad madmrdA:W4LLM¢4eW ......ww•eatame nt't'e at ate Drat'. rrukma fratsome a ti to OfFIC__ SEAL SUSIE K f1UEIT YOTART Mt1C.CJ1SgMA '7 �.v // On a ttAtT 0 SAN wf.tuto w t...a.w. I.enreta. 17 Ito CERTMCATE WfATEOFCALEPMmIA. QFYANDLLLwrYcrs4xnw.CISCO �- no, wl "tuC RR""m A"n"te Smnary of THE A4Ee1CAN INSURANCE COMPANY. a WE%- JERSEY CwFmnma Dp HFREtI CER• N Y•aeMWllar laAt Sy.Yv��jt�et[f'OA[R OF ATTORN[Y etwavtkl.O fmnWkl am enarndd,Wfmkrtemt etponep. Wl )IL SA W W ReNUtw el e4 SaMt sID✓mma.M Imo m W ►e.te of AlMfrl, tat et• r tan. '•WaWuWCitad CwMPNSu fratchw. DaW*r 16th tutor - January 86 � O aarr Alerrt•en•t•I ! �bTAaal ADD) a 4 ben.i No. 711 1116 Premium Ieclud 1 1. dun, for t +"�b�i�ciTw fT MAINTENANCE [ONO [YON ALL MN by TYLSt PRESENTS, That The William Lyon CmpAOy, ee PrinOlpal, and The Ametle" 'haulonce Cespany, intnrpgrated under the laws or the State or Now letseY, and authotlred to .acute bonds a Surety, ate held and it early bound Into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, Slate of California, In the sum or Fifty tent thousand ale boudeed ane nollbd _ Is Sl'600•m 1 Lawful money of the United State, of Aav -lea, for the payment of which suss, wall and truly to be made to said City of Rancho Cucamonga, Stab, of Capful /,. and PCIn4- pal 1"lotye bind theaselves, their administrators, successor Hl and assigns, Jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, The condition of the obligation is Such, that whereas, on or about way 11. ITtl , The William Lyon Company, u devwloper ,.tared Into an agreement for Tram 12b16 , Rancho Cucamonga, California for the sum of R 516.0100.00 , and whereas, under the terms of the agreement The Willi. Lyon Company Is :*quirod to give bond for f 51.640.00 to inaufe the City Of Rancho Cucamonga that the developer agrmas to repsir end maintain said Improvements In good condition and In accordanca with city specifications foe "a year after acceptance of said lapeovoents. NOW therefor., if sold developer shall foe s period of one year fe= and after the data of aca,Ptace of Improvements by sold City of Rancho Cucaeonoa repair 400 maintain aid Improvements, then the Obligation to be void, oth.mlae to rosin In toll force and effect. PRINCIPALS SORETTI LAN QYmLet �/ / ^ T11E AM[[IG CO" ANY INSURANCE COART ... .. �� _ 7 I 1 J�s.[� -/ r JLKS'f It In 1'R• ref Iat[14a a[amar. Attnnay- la -faR 1 Tba Ylll:�On fo,piny ' /0/ THE AMMICAN INSURANCE COMPANY We ASJ. mro DY THESE MES" T, TRtI THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. r t .w W am, by �rr/anw whey. "Ca' P,: aft "d �a t4 CM) W Cwr7 d Sao Fnabrle nCMdaW 6" Wr. pnun�� --- PATRICIA DRFBh•Dt --__ iIiii kwotl \afW AnwwyitSirFrt aDRfW oear oeoun W y ,0Mpl as atooa w"attn oN llad. Ietlrmr.Kal rinerkdarnd a9•n nr oed W MM,. wMnLLWa• ltropta.KS1 a sOn tm,ar eDIrPIKn, a IiK ta,Yn tMed adu7,tdMCa Iimt4o"by to ,any old u the waftarm,.1 R1xR Dankr,,, tgnd Dl0, P"uka, WSW Md,lk eeYwNrxJd14 Corp"" andd pwwd DJ n1 Sm"m"'Rntelnld/.dwdca"Amug MI t1JI the and AnwwrlstwFou My do to [he T„r.trt face aidrRm�7 -ad auto MKk V""Sm")DW SId Rlin d THE AMERICAN INSURANCECOYtANYu.., 'Arad[ YIIf..CpPO.awf W ArdkrVlAuwaoroo,at>q WAmrrpdo.Con WAdnb romFlgdhw�alAftlr A►pKw,y. Deavn, Me CAUr.v N V to" of d,, Revd d Meet, yt PmNnl uT Via.►r..dal r M1 w7n Rrnn+]tV eWd Y] the Rard d a9 A DIN abd a aW @I r Lp Yln•Padnl, .n, hra tae to na,, oppeal Rtv1,K A,Y,urt Srbrurra drolld��EK1W trp,rm W An fr W w 7tlW oI Ife Cwpalnp ed Nnn w rmfl IgM D,rtm W wtr oepawtewa fw W x Y,w SI. ArtkNP Tk Apllwer of oaf R.Wrel ASILUM SK,turin• AtarwrrkJKL M ASnu tLll k v pnnr'Ad k W Dumbm wuaeal Ibm, smarm nt. W w7"rppout.nt W V "away vuld th-6, aq k tno1M of W Ia, y 1De bud of DYeeun w A bay pew[ wpwnd watokes to tp M=ftI •' y lots K mwwy, k d mid MAkd mod. W by Dr &W Wq d the fMb.ind RrMiw.n rdrpd Dr fat d Dtrnm of THE eMERICAN��; INSURANCE COMPANY r r "turd dut) aryd tad 4Y a Ik nta do, d Strytem, HIM. W Yd Rew4nrm W M Dwn ■ma&d w Co ESOLVED. Wr the airy+wr d tnr VKr•PnlMennyN'uw Sra`a17•and RndrM ArJbw Sttrrtl Crportlw nrtl k Adlnd w pnu,d On An, porn d A Y w et, n•an.n d ro A d IM Cwpanl.ra ond,he xa el 1%. Dnnv4 rndtq pace dvlonrl on n[tAJlKedoe ,vm&IIt mww /•w man, r,ruA,ue rrbrwp lkrne Y, oYd W D.ndnrj Ypell wr Cwpwnlpe 7' 1 pan d rJlww7, w a}bAalt kY„rd tKD (KWd, YjlalYa w (K NNIr KL WN IY IN WITNESS %HEREOF. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY W ca." them Im mr1 w k grad by a. VK<drndtu, ad lbw.�enn we wk kmnwdffbtl" 26th dtyel Septerser 03 Ifs .� f �THE AAN NSURANCE COY ►ANY 1� ET.AIMOFCAEJIDR.NIA. CTIYAICDCQLWyyCISAb,M%CCSM 1.. VIIIIRL] ____.. -•- �.r_uw.umwq wenolWdpndMDaRlon n7Kd CwprtlrW ♦1N 14tltU Wla ptn• •f° e.w wa aunbm Iwao INWITNESS%TSEREOI.II,,Rentaua MI at, 7WudtR,N.r wk,d MM.1he 4yWyvkrra wobo" rhure b�)l/etwdn USIE AL SEAL Q `'�iA- ^�"K•^ wslE IC cwlc�I J1vE MOTI CI ATI Ca Rfluac IfIE Y Cre. +,Ke I.MW IWtOa CERTUICATE RATEOFCAEDORN74. �• tMYAfm p ANC COLwrYSANERESCO w X1• W odrnlded, Rbdrot A,vutrl Smnvy el THE AMERICAN INSUTANCT CDMPANY, r NE%• JERSEY 70 t W Iwaay rd Mu<4d POWER Or ATTORMCY rnwm to Iota Iwn u14t ea Mro rndd, W pCbrre,M.a DO HFRO1 CER• W 71 of14R /dtrullk Capenlw.W WRnMYarel,k budri DY„wry tomb m'" at- rrlAnswn4r AMKI, %III. SM Al4xr7, yr otn b fun. S�ttfWttddulAe CdyoMCwnrdSa FnAdMO. Drulur 16th 4)d January 19 86 11„rro, A,.wa 4r��� ■Ery4TAiiI /v RESOLUTION NO 9(p " 715 A 7CSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS NOS. 11934, 12044, 12045, AND 12046 AND IVTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts Nos. 11934, 12044, 12J45, and 12046 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is re. :uired to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE. be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Comletion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County PASSED. APPROVED;_%rhd ADJPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: �ettrey King, mayor ATTEST: every u e e , y er 1, OVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of April, 1996. Executed this 16th day of Aoril, 1986 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. every A. Authelet, y Er /03 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Lindi Beek, Engineering Technician "'A ier.; SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12801 located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Carnelian submitted by The Deer Creek Company Z- Tract 12801 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 24, 1984, for the division of 32.3 acres into 98 lets in the Low Residential Development District located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Carnelian. The Developer, The Deer Creek Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site iuprovemcnts in the fallowing amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $230,000 Labor and Material Bond: $116,000 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Hater District. C.C.AR.s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 12801, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. t fully su tied. LB s Attachments /D V CITY OF RANCHO VICIMIY MAP NOT TO SCAIE PROJECT: CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION 10 EXHIBIT. _____6 -T;2 TRACT 2801 CITY or RANCHO CUCANancA IAPROVENEMT AGREEMENT fall TRACT 12601 SOON ma do and entered t Into, 6107 COUcoreanpeywith That the Drovls Ions wof tthe lobdlvislon Nap I,ct of the State of Uli /oralo, and of t <n applicable ordinances of tin City of Rancho coca.onga, Cal lfornls. a nun icipal corporation, by and between cold Cl hAreiOafter raforood to is the City, and Ott, (,vet Co. ty. oa oper, hereina er re arre to ms the VITNESSETHt THAT, UNEREAS. said 041eiopar desires to de•eiep certain Droptrt 11 said City as shown on the conditl Onally lbdivlsion L aoDrored ow, av TR 12601 i and VNCRER5 fold City has established certain reaaulreunes tp be Net by told Developer al Drerequlflte to apDrgl of sold suDdlvlsion pen wally iccated on the seuU flee oI E n>o belwetb n an binI Annues _- NOV, 7.'TONE, It Is hereby agreed by said City and by sold Develop follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Oaseloper.s asperse all leprosuenty described on Page 6 here. of within twelve North$ from the effective date hereof 2 This agreement shall be affective on the date of the rerelutio. of the Council of said City approving thin agreement. This age ..... t shalt be in default on the day follo.t- 101 the (lent anniversary date o/ fall approval unless an uten. flan of tLe has been granted by avoid Clty as hereinafter Drorld- ad. C late the terms wAenofr w suchwrequestw shall bow submitted to the City in writing not ienf than 30 days before the aspiration data hereof, and s all contain a statement of circumstances 00cassltating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, lac luding the COntLrOLt1o0 standards. cost estimate, end Improvement security, Aid to require adjustments therein If any substantial :hangs has occurred du•Ing the tare hereof. e, If the Developer falls or neglects is comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shalt have the right at any time to cause said previsions to be not by any lawful moans, and th eraoppn recover floe the Developer and/or his Surety the falI enft and expense Incurred. S. The Oeveloper sheet provide mitered water service to each lot of Said der. III ... t In iCCOfdaOp with the fegeiatl0ns, scAVdufif, and fees of the Cucamonga County Vater District, relocation, or removalwnir any co pnnent responsible lAny irrigation replacement, system In conflict with construction of required Improvements to the tatishctlon of the City Engineer and toe owner of Seth water system. 64W U:ict A". Rancho C==nga, CA 91730 caefore to the iStatndard nDrawings Aid Standard shift of the City, and to the Improvement plan approved by and an file in the office of the City Engineer Said Improvements are tabulated an the Construttlon and Band Estemate, hereby InearPOr A.ed an 0ago 6 hereof, as titan from the improvement plans 11sef0 tAereo.. by number the Developer shall also be responsible for construe. t ion of any tranlltlans ar other Incidental work beyond the tract Daandartes as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. Cur r a" or Missions discovered dur Hg constructin shall be rected upon the direction of the City Engineer Revised wort due to said plan modifications shall be ton red by lave Drovis ions of this agreement and secured by tae surety covering the original Planned forks tl. Construction permits shall be obtained by the OavfIOD ^r from in' office of the City Engineer prior to start of work, all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attfWan given to safety Procedural, control cf dust, no Hr, or OC he, nuisance to the 4 -04. and to proper notification 01 public off) itie i and City Of Dar[ menu -allure to Comply with this settlon : All of subject to the penalties provided therefor, al 9. The sA m Developer oth Babel lerpn public[. Ights;of -ay within Or Adjoining ca Id development re salting from work relative to kaki development 10. Work done within @,filing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have tM right to Complete any and all work In the event of anj uttlflad delay In Cempletlpn. and to recover all Cost And expense incurred froe the 04181008, and /or his contractor by any lawful meant 11 Said Developer shall at all lists follcling dedica- tlan of the straits cad @elements in said subldivlsfun, up to the coepl8tton and acceptance of said work or improvement by said Clt CPanCII, give goad and Adwquate warning to the traveling pab�IC of each and every dangerous condition existent In Wd street or @element, and will protect the traveling publ C from such defective or dangerous conditions Until the coepletfan of all Improvements, herein incorporated an up6 . to be Perforead, each Of sold streets not ACc4Dtad as reeents shall be under the charge Of slid Developer. Said ovelOP @r may Clot* all or a portion of any street subject to the Conditions Contained In A temporary street Closure permit, Issued by the City En Inner, whenever It is necessary to protect the Po 0 made ing the construction of the Improvements herein agreed 12. parkway trees required to be Planted shall be C.anl e0 by the Developer Attie other Improvement work. grading and Cleanup has been Completed Ptalting shall be done as provided by Ordinance Is ReprdAnte with Ile planting diagram arvrol4d by the City Community of, I:pmi t Direnpe, The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining ell trees planted In good health until the end at the Soar atrees maintenance period, or for 004 year after pl ertlnp, wnl Cherer h later 13. The OeTtloper Is responsible for meeting +Ii tend 1. Hans established by the City Pursuant to the Subdiv 111 on .2- /07 and no Improvement teroritT Provfded haralnvlth shalt be released boor: such Acceptance unless other•ISe Provided and au released by the Clty Councl, Of the Clty, 30, This agreement thall not terminate vatll the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter dH Crlbed has been released by the City, or until a nee agreement together with the repulled Improvement security has been submitted to the City by a Count fiorsant has hbeenn acctptH +n Andy this agreement of the end city bproeennt se curtly the star has peen nlaased. the 1s. The Improvement security to be turnishtd by the Developer with this apreegrnt shalt consist of the following and inert be fn a form aCceOtable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance <t this aa ...... t. 1. A bond Or bonds by one or more duly Authorised corporate Sureties In the fora and content I pacified by Government Code Section d 66199.1. 1. An Improvement Security Instrument In the form an content Specified by the City Attorney. ] A demoAlt with the City Of .oney or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing -ate S. To securallaborerspAnd materiatmen: ?s 1. A bend or beads by one or more dal. Authorfied corporate suretles In the torn and content speelfied by Government Code Section 66699 t. t. An Improvement Secerity instrument In the form and content $Pecilled by the City Attorney, D. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind IPPrered for securing C. A cash dtposlt with the tity to guarantee payment by the Oooeper to the u•gfnctr or serreyoe whose CertftlCate Appears upon tat Final Map for the I n9 of All boundary, lot corner, area street Centerllna moncunts On A for furnishing centerllnm the may be any Amountcity CertlfldO mb an then engineer or vAtue Oyer ts submits d the Cash bond $hall be or, s shown OP the Construction sad land Estimate ContAlned heroin Said Pain t It may at rounded at soon as Prot e- dore penal is after recOlPt by the City of the centerline tea votes sn0 wry stare anurance of payment In /oil fr am tae angiuear or tun fyor. D. The rAlolred bonds and the principal emounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement 18. The Bpreloper warrants the& the lepro ctmenls abed In this agreement .hall be free from defects to tats and workmanship. Any and all portions of tae Improve. found to be defective within oa which th. ............ . ov (1). year faltee area en. or replaced by Oerelop;r (ni�o/ mil she city 0 o l The Developer er shell /urnl th a maintenance in a a. a uat a.. ._ _ eVa... Intersect guarantee securit p mall slip this paths �man br the Developer a• any obligation of the der %P*c fled w.,rk with re%pact to try park.ar -I. i Ar M r easiness or $200.00, whichever Is gdater, to scene, [ht faith /nl performance Of Ot.... hr's o011gatton$ as described In this part ra. gqrtph. The fOrmt1. by gnaramt \f lecYrltl %hill alfn A faftAfPe pto !tt\rt doanep 0y she Developer of Any Ott atlon of } the accepted Accepted And &$ SsI t district.p Oeto 1paravtYrnts and a saints".°.! the haverbeen by the Citl, the SILUr gat other I.proru,ntt bun acepptin g Agreement wit be release prodded to at cut h o r lad dotherdff such•�f lease Is by the Subdivlsl0" Mao Aet Oeleana w and Anl applicable City ti. Than the Developer shall take put and maintain such lllp and praplrtl damage I°suranp, iii. takdt anb as shall Protect by this ctmr .from melalr/on agreement Performing rork covered .rife Dhuus, of the /Pr ,pages nature of the wProperty r r fom toff agreueat, tMther such oPeratta°f be tlhic unBAY crntractorr by himself or 07 my by an or subcontractor, or anyone dlrertlY "Played b said {' or Indirectly persons ere" though such dimarea be nut .stied the subcontractor p " an ena employed by slide anY coatrutor or ,,.tl and y p persons. Thp D add U Insured v y _,j And directly f°lnrance shall lilt the C tl 'ai ape" s and amDloHea. a ran &protect eveloper�l is lee subcontractors ckntractoef net hereunder shall Tae Policies trance shat) be as follons min lmumpnounts of Such Insurance x A Co,nitractors liability Insurance prod dln0 bodily death Ila0filty limits { f]80,OOOr of not leas the /or Bach person end (1,000,000 for std dent et Rich occurrence, and property eawige Ifabll• r Ilmlts not lets than dart cc $100,000 for each acct. w it $250,000 for clalmsewhich ear arise Team thlimit of works the Ohdloper In the V r pilfer...., \f the work herd" provide d b Automobile liability I ... rence covering all vehicles used In the d par /orwinu of this a0reement leas Ms bestir injury ltability limits of not than 5200.500 for Both person and $]00, C00 for each Accident liability limit, oOccur otrl"cto Ae damage [ fSO,000ty with aggregate l ease then pSI00,000 l`1 a'A 1h1iA of snot tlrfc Of the Derflaon, or his Contractor to Der /or Ing the rork provide far beret". 5 agcertificates ment, agut,, of Oeveloper shall lhfile With they Citytatcertlflutee or eprtllletip certificate ificatece Shallrle beer Specified insurance. an Cenh such an endorsement Precluding ecertlftutapdb the aft r t /ors rsttea '"Y f Policy ealdences after the City {I she thirty dca! here race ad noe/fleatleap will from the Insurance carrise. y registered 1 As evidence .f understanding the Provisions contained Intent folio herein, and to comply with fame, the SYD divider cif submitted fighting described Lprort.ent dynetare hereto: the Security. and his a /fl aid his rY� Q_ T FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE TWe: PrIn0lDal A%Oudtl 710.000 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PATNCNT Type: P11 -CIPal Amount: 115,000 Nlte and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMERTATION Type: Pf IntlPal AOauntt 2,eg1 Nine and address oI surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: PrInCIP61 Amount: N80� addrest of surety! f� 70 BE POSTED PRIOR TO AC.EPTAN[( BY THE CITY IN FITNESS HEREOF, the parties tarato have caused these presents to be duly taecutad a: acknomledped msth all formalities required by Ism on the dat set forth opposite !brit slpNtures TIIE DEG CREEK COMPANY. A Oena[al Pa[tnarship Data by ure .OereloDer BY. ORICSBY DZVEtl)PMENr. I= A Cana r al � Oast 7/71/86 by I _ •c.th cf Developer Der yrut? 'r V poseurs 4 Jan E. Grigsby Printed ataR sl Ban eEatAtDIR Q35f—� aMN 71St � ana0.Oy uaamt Ds ewrlld B_ts wow a•<•+rms+.a _OR [ CR Li71L 08 ••�ra4ela4Ytrirh rib a ranwma r.I ..nmwrw brnrvan wewawr Ntrsw -- DE _ nro,a ar amlraM1 Vwwr,.r tnN E s °'°+ I"^•• aw[nwr.wnM1rrr`.,m�wremrwr.w,•,. — S clicssr DtvaLOPNEF INC." rwraa, aim . PE M1""v�sear•r.�rVr re 2 PER GRF[A_SonPA.n Il4 aoraAVaeAt Olt— p —� F pr 1 .wM1l r'f nd•r M1 w/w rwwl wl �se•a.vwnwersw rrrse�i a.� wm I r�0'remara M1,A emn[Etw aer rr taut rr wos mm aIIDI H C. xVC 3 a ren�e'ms°w.L s ° y Iw t 4r //0 1. LMIOItklw. EMCROMCI91Ent rtm it FEE SCHEME rur livrosttenl: 7MCT W. 12801 Vatee 2 -s -e ills ae ermce: - �City uOrawlnq ro MOTE: Does rot Include current fn for wrlt"I pare" or p41temt deposits QUANTITY UNIT TEN 641 L.F ORICF 3055 L.F P,C C. curb - 12• C.F 24' quite, F.C.C. curb . °• 0.F. 24• 2,25 /6/7.73 _1210_ L.F. gutter P.C.C. curb only 6. C.r 6.00 TM4T� -_ 6 L.F S.F 6• -12• Curb Tra:ule slop 4' F.O.0 S.SD 6.30 S.F slJewalL ire 1.25 r S.F Dr approach 0• P.C.C. TSZ75.- �y C.T. cross gutter (Inc. curb) Street eauratlon ]•j0 C.T Iegorted eetanteenl 1 6 ° - 33.212 S.F Preparation of ,b 1 s0 so Ag 2•e S.F TOM grow Crushed 199• base [per Inch thick) O. 0.0S ° 5 0, 304 96 -� TOM A.0 aqr 1300 tans) A.C. 900 to 1300 tent) 22.00 TOR A.C. Soo to 900 tonal 75.00 TOA i7 S.f A.C. un,j" 500 tone) 45.60 60 00 S.F A,C. S• thlckl patch A.C. Ilrenchl O.SS T a o I• th Eck A.C. onrla, 1.75 A. �- A. EA, Adjust sewer eaMOle le grade ndJust 250.00 Up x'00 S [A. (ESTER. sewer Clem wt to grade AdJolt water vl•ol to grade 150.10 23,00 L.F Street Is it arrlcades (lutersec. SS00 eln) 1000.00 LF EA. 2 • A• red+ow holder Reap rat I DID TrTr L.F. of A.C. pa.eem t7'ary,tTd0f5txet Aeeo•al of D.C.C. 500 3L L.F. mrb fOatter -l2• Reseal of A.C. titre 5.50 T.D3YD0 a EA. T (A. Tenet c: ns Traffic: 1,00 300.00 ---- o L.F S.r Concrete block wall 35.00 25.00 �73�0 �- ION Ibtslning wall Aggregate base 20.00 C.T. L.F. Concrete struc Sam 10• 2 00 125.00 LF PCP 24• RCP (2000 D 0� 29.00 -- L•i 36• nCP �ISCO 20M 0 35.00 L•P 40• PCP 1200 0 49.00 -. - [A• Catch basin N • 4. 76.00 EA, Catch basin N . 0• 2COO.00 EA. Catch bast, M . 221 2900.00 EA. Local depresslOn 4 4SO0.00 [A. EA. Local depresslon 12• 500.00 10a0.00 -� EA. Junction strum,-, Outlet llructare. Std 2500 5000.01 EA. LA• Outle! structure. $lu 1502 150°'00 500.00 L.F Guard posts Cuard panel (wed) 40.00 �a EA. EA. EA. Street Treae S25..00 0.00 - L.F. Naad•all (AD- wing) 14mvs LNletlnq barricade 4000.00 $'�O -I(y >.9ae S.F Lmdseapin�p6 Irrlgallon- CMNELIM 230.00 30 HQndlup 2.7505 7TU G.P. }rasp •) 77SO �e71'VO EI6IMEIRING INSPECTION FEE 9,825 500 TOTAL •IESFINAT ION2°ELINEAT ION CASII j".7811 DEPOSIT (RETOIt0A0LE1 L,OA CONTIMGENCT COSTS 76 JDTI£7T IO ,WNATIOR StMETT (CASH) 2,800 rAtT10L% PEIFMKWE CONO IT=) 7JDZfOV.'00 - LAEOR AND MATERIAL BOND (501) fa i170II; OQ •I'urSuant to City of Rancho C$uraeonga lim"Ipd Code, Title 1, Chapter 1.00, hr,ardino County Cady les, Chapters L5, he adopting Sm ce a Cash reslontI"jdallnntlon deposit $hall sate prior l0 issuance of m Engineering Construction PCrelt. 'trlsed 3164 / ' / RESOLUTION NO. t444"R 3(, - 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE C.TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12801 WHEREAS. t,•- Tentative Map of Tract No. 12801, consisting of 98 lots, submitted by The Deer Crepk Company, Subdivider, located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Carnolian, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS. to meet the requirements established as prereyulslte to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ix Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: I. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: — 7e.1g, or //1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer By Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUB.IECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12621 located on the south side of Arrow, between Madrone and Baker submitted by Rlchwood Development Company cy Tract 12621 was approved by the City Council on February 7, 1985. The Developer, Rlchwood Development Company, submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the .following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $169,000 Lebor and Material Bond: S 84,500 At this time, the developer is requesting approval of a twelve month extension on said improvement agreement. REC"WATIOM It is recocmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 12L21, accepting said extension agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. I ImpExtAgmt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA •- IMPROYDIENT El(TEHSIOR AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 112621 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with he provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between the said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Richwood DL-mlopment he referred to as the Developer. 4ITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an improvement agreement with the City as a requisite to issuance of buildings permits, and WHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the said improvement agreement. NON. THEREFORE, it is her*Nv agreed by the City and by said Developer as 'p follows: 1. The completion date of the terms of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period of 12 months from the date of City Council approval of said agreement. 2. Increase in improvement securities to reflect current improvement costs shall be furnished by the developer with this agreement and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 3. The required bond and the additional prineipel amounts thereof are set forth on the attached sheet. 4. All other terms and conditiuns of the said improvement agreement shall remain the same. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the Developer has submitted the below described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: 3/11/86 IN =M FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Description: Surety: Additional Principal Amount: N/A Address: MATERIAL AM, LABOR BOND Description: Additional Principal Amount: :i /A Surety: Address: CASH DEPOSIT MONMEMTATION BOND Additional Cash Deposit: N/A MAINTENANCE GUARAI(TEE BOND Principal Mount: N/A To be posted prior to acceepttance of the project by the City. RRRNf lff fff Mf ff RlfflffHfNtMffMffMfffyfRfffffff fffyfyf}fffttffhyRRffMtf CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: RSct3S9 - DeJam31t Ccapany. Inc e rey ng, ayor / Attest: � every ut a et, ty er RED AN/S=WN0WI TD CUD'gE yyME TfOSw?CAY OF.jt,,,(., ,19Y.,� OFFICIAL SEAL NoTAkyyR� A DI GIACr WCUC . GIt[a'1nl\ lot R:fSI (S tTryy r ist7 :::r ••.�•• =t arr NOTE: FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IM TRIPLICATE AND DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MOST BE NOTARIZED //s RESOLUTION NO. Rei•K bW 8'(P — 9 % A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12621 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its cm:sideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on February 7, 1986, by Richwood Development Company as developer, for :he improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the reAl property specs ically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Arrow, between Madrone and Baker; and WHEREAS, the instAllation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the trams thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12521; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement Is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. y NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT RESOLVED by the City Council of tke City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Extension Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of Apefl, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: ever y e e , y er. Jetfrey ng, or l/� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE April 16, 1986 LS TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Vartan V. Vartanians. Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PIPELINE LICENSE BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN U3-THE- Crrf- N- CORNEC= SJI - Located east of aven Avenue, north of ase Line Road and also, the approval of an agreement between Lewis Hanes of California, the developer and the City. n The Southern Pacific Transportation Company has issued the attached Pipeline License to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of certain storm drain facilities within the railroad right -of -way in connection with Tract No. 12590, located east of Haven Avenue, north of Base Line Road. Lewis Homes of California, the developer of said tract, has submitted an agreement (attached for approve:), to fulfill the construction requirements as stipulated in said Pipeline License. REWI ENDATION: It 1s recommended that City Council adopt the attached esoA —Tfion approving the Pipeline License between the City and the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. In addition, It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached agreement between the City and Lewis Homes of California and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Res tfu sut� to , Lit u8 S Ct Engineer LH:VV*das Attachments 0 A�tEA !/HOER c'oNJio£,rpTioN I %m IV. rr.ro I / %:yyyyn: t � sr.s• — �1 •ar awe er w. w wh• �w 2Z an .wi ua avrca •�1R !f0 ;r.59 ) -J TR• Na /Lf7O i b y r 3cG � • ••� {/'�n/Tl.f►).ftl 4 }_ �naZ Jl• b/ / , ��rr'' 73 * —` •\ ; v�y r �KNJ ,1590- C _ 'bt ucnar -- — = - -- r — -a, I (NM•La ir•MI / (aMf N'J I )'-a.�•�� V I, R >'f -n ra�f / K NYf.YI AMC I (�rC /a �C �/ / aoUTN LMI MCTA �RO./O r fr � a -7t4,'6 7 t 671 V /CINI T Y MAP CITY OF PROJECT TK, /2590 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:t�.�/E t✓cE.icsE w/ ENGINEERING DIVISION //8 EXHIBIT:R'Q /� � f f �O AND aHZN ACCOAOCD YAK To MINN. .r L ALSO ASSIGNED LEASE D E E(a.�(� AUDIT NO. - .ZI�yyGG AUDIT Nw 6 Y2 Y/ WACi Aeove TNi: UNC FOR ACCO"eCAO vs REIMIS: BBO-523.93/521.31- R (N) THIS INDENTURE, made this_;M_'Tday ofJ •!_1114 �, 1906, by and between SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, herein termed 'Railroad,- and CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, a municipal corporation of the State of 401ifornia, address: 9320 Baseline Road, Rah—no Cucamonga, California 91701, herein termed "Grantee"; WITNESSETH: I. Railroad hereby grants to Grantee, subject to the reservations, covenants and conditions herein contained, the right to reconstruct, main- tain and operate a 2,022 -foot longitudinal two (2) foot concrete drainage Swale, hereinafter termed "structure," in, anon, along, across and beneath the property of Railroad, at or near Grapeland (Rancho Cucamonga), in the l County of San Bernardino, State of California, between and opposite i Engineer's Station 2152 +46, Mile Post 523.93, and Engineer's Station I 2172 +68, Mile Post 524.31, in the location shown on the print of Railroad's Drawing A- 13957, Sheet No. 1, dated April 30, 1985, attached and mode a part hereof. 1 -a. Said structure is being installed pursuant to s separate I agreement between Railroad and Lewis Development Company. This indenture; shall not become effective until such date as Grantee has accepted the i said structure into its utility system. Grante -e agrees to notify Railroad of such date. event n Rail- road shall be taken orcondemn + d for public use (I(including mconveyance by deed in lieu of or in settlement of condemnation proceedings), Grantee shall receive compensation only for the taking and damaging of Grantee's takingeorncondemnation awardedntotGrenteedshallsborassignedtbyfGrantea tol Railroad. , 1 -c. As part consideration for the rights herein granted, Grantee shall pay to Railroad the sum of Three Hundred Seventy -five Dollars ($375.00). -1- //9 2. Project markers in form and s.ze satisfactory to Railroad, identifying the facility and its owner, will be installed and constantly maintained by and at the expense of Grantee at Railroad property lines or such locations as Railroad shall approve. Such markers shall be relocated or removed upon request of Railroad without expense to Railroad. Abuonce of markers does not constitute a warranty by Railroad of no subsurface installations. 3. This grant is made subject and subordinate to the prior and continuing right and obligation of Railroad, its successors and assigns, to use all the property described herein in the perforoance of its duty as a common carrier, and there is reserved unto Railroad, its successors and assigns, the right (consistent with the rights herein granted) to construct, reconstruct, maintain and use existing and future railroad tracks, facilities and appurtenances and existing and future transportation, communication and pipeline facilities and appurtenances in, upon, over, under, across and along said property. 4. This grant is made subject to all licensee, losses, ease- ments, restrictions, concitions, covenants, encumbrances, liens and claims of title which may affect said property and the word •grant" as used herein shall not be construed as a covenant against the existence of any thereof. 5. The rights herein granted to Grantee shall lapse and become void if the construction of said structure upon said property is not commenced within one (1) year from the dote first herein written. 6. Grantee shall boar the entire coat and expense of MOCHI UOM M A Mt,% reconstructing and maintaining said atructure upon said property. Grantee agrees that all work upon or in connecticn with said structure shall be done at such times and in such manner as not to interfere in any way whatsoever with the operations of Railroad. The plans for and the mz=3txx%z*Aax= reconstruction of said strud- ture shall be subject to the approval of Railroad. Grantee agrees to reimburse Railroad for the coat and expense to Railroad of furnishing any materials or performing any labor in connection with the canxxiaxximm reconstruction, maintenance and removal of said structure, including, but not limited to, the installation and removal of such falsevork and other protection beneath or along Railroad's tracker and the furnishing of such watchmonr flagmen end inspectors as Railroad deems necessary. 7. In the event Railroad shall at any time so require, Grantee, at Grantee's expense, shall reconstruct, alter, relocate said struc- ture or otherwise iopro.z ^aid structure upon receipt of written notice from Qailroad so to do. -2- //DG B. Grantee shall, at its expense, comply with all applicable lave, regulations, rules and orders regardless of when they becoue or became effective, including, without limitation, those rlating to health, safety, noise, environmental protection, waste disposal, and water and air quality, and furnish satisfactory evidence of such compliance upon request of Railroad. Should any discharge, leakage, spillage, emission or pollution of any type occur upon or arise from the premises covered hereunder as a result of Grantee's use, presence, operations or exercise of the rights granted hereunder, Grantee shall, at its expense, be obligated to clean all property effected thereby, whether owned or controlled by Railroad, or any third Perron, to the satisfaction of Railroad (insofar as the property owned or controlled by Railroad is concerned) and any governmental body having jurisdiction in the matter. Railroad may, at its option, clean Reilroad'a premises: if Railroad elects to do so, Grantee shall pay Reilroad the coat of such cleanup promptly upon the receipt of a bill therefor. Grantee agrees to isastigate, release, indemnify and defend Zx Railroad [rem and age ins C all liability, crat and expense (including, without limitation, any fines, penalties, judgments, litigation costs and attorney foes) incurred by Railroad as a result of Grantee's breach of this section, or as a result of any such discharge, leak- age, spillage, emission or pollution, regardless of whether such liability, cost or expense arises during the time this indenture is In effect or thereafter, unleac such liability, cost or expense is proximately caused solely and exclusively by the active negligence of Railroad, its officers, agents or employees. 9. As part consideration, Grantee agrees to Pay Railroad an amount equal to any and all assessments which may be levied by order of any authorized lawful body against the property of Railroad (and which may have been Paid by Railroad) to defray any part of the cost or expense incurred in connection with the construction of acid structure upon said property commenced within one (1) year from the date first herein written. 10. Grantee, its agents and employees subject to provisions hereof, shell have the privilege of entry on said property for the purpose of dUbc47Simr3c>:7cacX reconstructing, maintaining and making necessary repairs to said structure. Grantee agrees to give Railroad five (5) days' written notice prior to commencement of any work on said structure, except emergency repairs, in which event Grantee shall notify Railroad's authorized representative by phone. Grantee agrees to keep said property and said structure in good and safe condition, free from waste, so far as affected by Grantee's oper- ations, to the satisfaction of Railroad. If Grantee fails to -3- /a / koep said property and said structure in a good and safe condition, free from waste, then Railroad may perform the necessary work, at the expense of Grantee, which expense Grantee agrees to pay to Railroad upon demand. 11. In the event any work upon or in connection with said structure or its appurtenances, to be dono upon or adjacent to the tracks and property of Railroad, should be let to a contractor by Grantee, such work shall not be begun until such contractor shall have first entered into an agreement with Railroad, aatiafa story to Railroad, and indemnifying Railroad from and against all halms, liability, cost and expense growing out of the performance of the work to be done by such contractor. 12. Insofar as it lawfully Day, Grantee agrees to investigate, release, defend and indemnify Railroad, its officers, employees, agents, successors and assigns, from all claims, liability, cost and expense howsoever same may be caused, including reasonable attorney fees, for loss of or damage to property and for injuries to or deash of persons %rising out Wthe)9QOaVcRftVtkgtftX reconstruction, mainta« nanee, presence, use or removal of said structure, regardless of any negligence or alleced negligence, active, passive or otherwise, on the part of Railroad employees. The word 'Railroad' as used in this section shall be construed to include, in addition to Railroad, the successors, assigne and affiliated companies of Railroad and any other railroad cor,pany that may be lavfullp operating upon and over the tracks crossing or adjacent to said structure, and the officers and employees thereof. 13. Should Grantee, its successors or assigns, ut any Line abandon the use of said property, or any part thereof, or fail at any time to use the same for the purpose contgmplated herein for a continuous period of one (1) year, the right hereby given shall coase to the extent of the use to abandoned or discontinued, and Railroad shall at once have the right, in addition to, but not in qualifica- tion of the rights hereinabove reserved, to resume exclusive possession of said property or the part thereof the use of which is so discontinued or abandoned. Upon termination of the rights and privileges hereby granted, Grantee, at its own cost and expense, agrees to remove said structure from said property and restore said property as nearly ea practicable to the same state and condition in which it existed prior to the construction of said structure. Should Grantee in such event fail, neglect or refuse to remove said structure and rertore said property, such removal and restoration may be performed by Railroad, at the expense of Grantee, which expense Crantee agrees to pay to Railroad upon demand, or Railroad may, at its option, assume ownership of said structure. -q- /a.�L 14. The parties itend that the promises and obligations of this indenture shall c-•nstitute covenants running with the land so as to bind and benefit their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate as of the day anf year first heroin written. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, By , (Title) �M^Kb • uvwuus. tRIMU Attest: I -�-•�i+'A.a�.U1 Assistant Secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, By Maycr By. ia3 T� Clerk a 0 n .q AREA !/NDG/p coNtioE,r prio v spa 1 tiD / / ) LY tw[ M wai w wM tiw mwua aas ouy 2 N4 /ZS•p IR,Y.7 7c_,�.6 rJ7R f'c f. ^.SVJ -3 S � � sea rflr/f.vet♦ ltd /TPyfP.I+I a nd vlo rr 8 •:. `yl v. �i� zv /rUlff Jd`7 /7y od7 Ind oil t 9�.awu're .w.erFt T o Jr 1 -^.- y� / 1 Y. V if r` nw rey / renrt+.two+t - 1 1, TRACT N(' «G2, ,t! B 34'67 E 67 /z, V /C //V /T Y MAP G� h• CITY OF PROJECT: 2 /25900 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: eZ&2 ✓E G,cE,ic ENGINEERING DIVISION /c) L EXHIBIT•"" "f. moo' AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 7th day of March 1986, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a Municipal corporation, he.einafter "City" and LEAIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA hereinafter "Developer•, provides as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS, there is °attached hereto: (1) Exhibit 'A" a proposed s Pipeline License, hereinafter 'Contract', between the SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, hereinafter -Railroad, and the City for the construction of storm drain facilities consisting of concrete drainage Swale between and apposite Engineers Station 2152+46, Mile Post 523.93, and Engineers Station 2172 +68, Mile Post 624.31, hereinafter referred to as 'Structure ", at or near Grapeland (Rancho Cucamonga), in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, in the locations shown on the print of Railroads Drawing A- 13957, Sheet No. 1, dated April 30, 1985, marked "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof. WHEREAS. Deveioper desires that said Structure be built to facilitate development of his project. WHEREAS, City is willing to enter into the Contract only if Developer pays all cost of constructing the Structure and agrees to in all respects, assume and perform obligations of the City under the Contract; and, 6E ..y WHEREAS, Developer is willing to do the sane. NOW, THEREFORE, :ity and Developer agr_e as follows: (1) City shall execute and deliver to Railroad the Contract. (2) Within fifteen (15) days after writteli demand by City, Developer shall deposit with City the sum of $375.00 as a security for the payment of compensation for the license. (3) Developer shall construct said Structure and in so doing shall in all respects comply with all trams and conditions of the Contract. Developer shall pay, without limitation, all costs of constructing the Structure. (4) Developer shall require that each contractor of Developer engaged frr the purpose of constr -Wing the Stricture, execute and comply with ell "contractor's agreements- which are required by the Railroad, as well as comply with ail terms and provisions of the Contract. (5) Developer shall insure that each contractor engaged by Developer for the construction of the Structure, or any part thereof, has the City named as an additional insured on each policy of insurance that the contractor is required to furnish pursuant to the terms of the Contract or indenture. (6) Developer agrees to indemnify City from and against all costs, expense, claims, and liabilities for injury to or death of persons (including, but not limited to, passengers and employees of Railroad and employees of City), and damage to or loss of property (including, but not limited to, property owned, leased, occupied or used by or in the care, custody or control of Railroad or the employees of Railroad or City or the employees of City), however same may be caused, resulting from, arising out of, or in any way connected with this Agreement or the construction of the aforesaid undersigned _2. /06 F 7+ project, whether or not Caused or contributed to by any negligent act or omission on the part of any of City's agents or employees. (7) Should either party bring suit to compel performance of this Agreement or to recover for breach of any covenant or condition contained herein, the prevailing party shall pay reasonable attorneys fees in addition to the amount of Judgemeot and costs. (8) Time is of the essence of this Agreement. (9) This Agreement may be codified or amended only by an instrument in writing executed by both parties. (10) This Agreement shall be binding and shall inure to the benefit of successor and assigns of th!�-Oarties hereto. -r.,r iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Beverly A. ut a et, :y er'ti- STATEOFCAUFORHIA lu COUNTY OF SAV BERN•ROIHO I LEWIS HOMES OF IFORNIA dY:,'L_�i� utnor ze ent O„ March 25, 1986 _IHO" rI,.peO~sd•HdHpP� ww Sm•, pw,pn,FF •pp„„� Richard A. Lewis pw,YMLY•AOV11m in•p;,wedm Teenn.ar.aurcrwnwwrc.lme,Or D✓•enwlwu•apwltlY.uv1•n hM,w I""" AdLEWIS HOMES OFCALROPNIA Mo•rvnI+DNM •a•MM W.eAh Wlvnnl•M 60MA %Hd m as eYM hat" •aw d1••M• In Yd M bda of uN pwVAMM utl UM "M p,NMHMp Y1CWd dq YIx =ROBINSON EAL INSON xpo•w ININ w COpNTr Wr.V.IEU EOM ARaQnspn / \ (TAW •r••bdIkJY MHYI •••1 RESOLUTION NO. effiiiNW 841 — 9 O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICENSE BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN THE RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -HAY WHEREAS, storm drain facilities are required to be installed within the Southern Pacific Transportation Company right -of -way near the Engineer's Stations 2152 +46 and 2172 +68, County of San Bernardino, State of California, for project, Tract No. 12590; and WHEREAS, the CCi�ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga California, has for its d�ideration a Pipeline License between the Southern- Pacific Transportation Company and the City for the right to install the storm drain facilities at the above location. NON, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Pipeline License be and the same is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign same on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: aver y u e- e- , ern Jeffrey ng, yor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 16, 1986 TO: City Councll and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Mnnoger SUBJECT: Approval of Adjustment In Emergency 'On-call" Compensation and Establishment of Minimum Fburiy Compensation for Evening Safetv Surveillance Patrol for Maintenance Services Personnel Presently, the City of Rancho Cucamongass emergency "oncall^ compensation for a malWenence employee is $18.00 per week (7 days). During the non - working hours of this seven day period, the employee has a pager and Is required to respond to all maintenance related emergencies (le., hozaa��pQ u�s waste spills. rood hazards, flood damage, wind _► damage, etcJ within twenty mfot s& This rate was established In 1983 when the 'bn- } call "program was less active. In )rder to review this matter, a survey was conducted of the local agencies which the City of Rancho Cucamonga utilizes for salary and benefit comparison. Listed below is the survey data: "Oncall^ city �wnt Formula Chino $70.00 1 hour pay for each day on call Fontano $1 :010 Flat $130M per week Ontario $80.00 5% of monthly salary Redly $120.00 1 hour per weekday and 4 hours er /.1 Saturday, p oy, and holidays Uo land $87.00 Mlnlmum wage for hours on m;:. Carom $70.00 Flat $70 Riverside $129.00 1 hour per weekday and 8 hurs pet Saturday, Sunday, and holidays Claremont None Nam Pomona $106.00 1 112 hour per weekday and 4 hours per Saturday, Sunday, and holidays Mc^ .M $87.00 per week Rancho Cucamonga $18.03 per week /.1 As can be seen, the results of the survey Indicated the City of Rancho Cucamonga is below the competitive market rate for emergency 'bncoll "compensatlon. It Is recommended 'he City Council approve an adjustment for 'bnroll" compensation to a flat ninety collars ($90.00) per week, to be effective April 18, 1986. With the recent implementation of an evening Safety Surveillance Patrol, additional responsibilitn -s have been placed on the maintenance services staff. It was originally thought the Safety Surveillancu Patrol duties would be absorbed by the staff member handling the emergency 'bn -call" program. These two jab assignments have pi oven to be too great for one individual to handle. The placing of dual responsibilities has not allowed the employee time to handle both tasks and work his normal dally shift. In approaching both the emergency 'on-call' v-4 6.fety Surveillance ProSrom, the best path appears to separate the duties. This -!s-.s one person 'on-call" and another an Sofety Surveillance Patrol. The Safety Surveillance Patrol activities takes a little more than twn hours each evening without any major problems or interruptions. This duty requires an employee who completes their normal shift at 100 pm. (6:00 am. start) to leave work and return at elsk (5:00 pm. - 8:00 pm. depending on the season) to perform the Safety Surveillance Patrol. The Safety Surveillance Patrol Is a unique activity for Rancho Cucomongo, and there Is w comparison for compensation. In taking Into account that the activities require o little more than two hours to perform, a tampensotim level shwld be established. It Is recommended the City Council establish a three (3) hour minimum for weekday Safety Surveillance Patrol duties and a four (4) hour minimum for weekends and holidays. Both of these at the rate of time and cite half (this would be normal overtime anyway because the duties are over and above the 40 tour York week), to be effective April 18, 1986. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of Adjustment In Emergency -On-call- Compensation and Establishment of Minimum Hourly Compensation for Evening Safety Surveillance Patrol for Maintenance Services Personnel. RARank 1,50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 t977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT- Approval of acceptance of Carnelian Street Beautification Project as complete and authorize the filing a Notice of Ctrmpletion for the work The Carnelian Street Beautification Improvement Project has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council approve the acceptance of !!W-project, authorize the final payment and direct g, the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release performance surety ($213,769.30) and retention ($15,549.58). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council accept as complete the Carnelian Street Beautification Improvement Project and pass the attached resolution o norizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and release performance bonds and retention (3b days after filing Notice of Completion) and authorize final payment. L➢N:DB:jaa Attachment /3/ e RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: T ss 1. The lmdersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: CARNELIAN STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT 2. The full name _nd address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. 0.• the 16th day of April, 1986, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: CARNELIAN STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: ARTISTIC LANDSCAPE 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: CARNELIAN STREET FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO BANYAN STREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Date L10YO B. Roos. y ng neer /3a RESOLUTION NO. 4 W -+& $ (o - q? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CARNELIAN STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Carnelian Street Beautification Project have been completed to the satlsfacticn of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, a4d.ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. Yi AYES: HOES: ABSENT: Jettrey King, or ATTEST: every A. Authelet,-My—Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cdlifornia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of April, 1986. Executed this 16th day of April, 1986 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. every . u e e , y er /,33 ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DA. 7: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician o n d 1977 SUBJECT Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 8680 located on t,e east side of Ramona, south of Base Line, submitted by 11 b S Residential Development, Inc. Parcel Map 8680 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 26, 1984, for the division of 3.177�''ee5 into 3 parcels 177 the Low Median Development District located on the east'side of Ramona, south of Base Line. The Developer, M d S Residential Development, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $31,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $15,600.00 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cvcamunga County Water District. C.C.dR s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RELONKMAT10N It is recowended that the City Council zdopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 8680, a ^cepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Respect fully suamt ed i 7 i BH1L as Attachments 13z1 LCGA %ON MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION iw flo PROJECT: PM 8680 TITLE: EXHIBIT CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL NAP 2660 KNOW ALL MEN 81 THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement Is mad& and entered Into, In odnformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of Calffor•ita, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr. ad to as the Cfly. by and between said City and M A 5 Pr31LE1TISL DEVFI11itO:R. I:C hereinafter nlerrtd to as the —bete open TWAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop Certain real property In said City located on ttw lost std• of Ramona south of n,ee It, t and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to he met my said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and postinyyf lepfar6At security as A rein. fter cited, and approved by ipm C I t tt ney, are deemed to be equlvaltnt to prior completion of said req, resents for the purpose of securing said approval Mw, THEREFORE, it Is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1 The 0&velooer hereby agrees to construct at dmvelOPer6s expense all Improvements described an pile A hereof within 12 months from the date hereof Z. This agreement shall be effective on he data of the resolution of the Council of said City aiprovinq this agreement This agreement s h a l l be in default an INa dry Follow. Ing the ffrst anniversary date of said approval uriess an eaten. t Ion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid. ed 0 The Developer, may request additional time In which to complete Vd provisions of this agreement, In writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and Including9 t star eetnt of circumstances of necessity for additional time In epnslaera- tlon of such reeuent, the City reserves the right to review the provil"ns hereof. Including construction standuds, cast estlAatee and fufflc Racy of the Improvement aecurft /. and to require ao,lustmenr thereto when warranted by substantial changes the Hn a If aft Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provision, of this agreement, the City she 11 have the right at any time to cause sold pro, sions to be cemplet allay my taw. ful -ttins, and thereupon to recover from •ate De uelaytr and/or his Surety the Tull cost and expense Incurred In to doing, S Construction permits shall be Obtained by the Dowel. Offer from the office of the City Engineer prior to [tart of any work within the public right.of.way, and the developer shall to AAUCt such wort In full compliance with the regulations coats nod therein Non-compliance may result In stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6 Public right.of• way improvement work required shall be constructed In Conformance with approved Improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special •b -2150 6.1 Airway C, std Mesa r CA 92526 S.F., O.R., Res., P.N..CUP 13h amenaments thereto Construction Small include any transition$ and/or other Incidental wort 004094 ntte SlAry for drainage or public safety. Errors ar emOISSIGAS hcSOaysred during construc- tlon ,hall be Corrected upon the direction or the City Engineer Reeked wort due to $aid plan modifications ,hall be C4ver0d by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety Covering the original planned worts 7. Wort done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly pursued to completion; the City Shall have the right to complett any And all wort in the event of tnJustifled delay In cc +ptetion. and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the oovoloper And /or hit contractor by any lawful means S. The Developer ,hall be resoonsibl, for replacement. relocations. or removal of any component of any irrigation water system In conflict with the r. p 4lred waft to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. W The 0$veloptr shall be responsible for removal of all loose root and other debris from the public right -of- my. V�yy,,,,,yy 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain p4rgPiy treesTas directed by the Community Develop. ant 0lrecter 11 The i.DrovOmmt security to be far•.ithed by the otV* er to guarantee Cosplttlon of the tares of this agreement sh411 De su 6 l4tt to the approval of the Clty Attorney The prin- p41 amount of ,aid improvement security Shall not be less than the &mount shown _Z' pa FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: principal Amount S31,W0.00 Rate and address of surety 33yj�1RAMCE C COMPANY tn A 01 MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Principal Amopnt SIp.500.00 lams and address of surety �LVEIXPyRS LAVPA.NCE CMPANY 333 Wilshire, Arohelm, Ca 9,301 CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type' Pr1nCIPa1 Amount: S 1.350.0` Mime and address of surety TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO f.CCEP -ARCE BY THE CITY z—, IN tIT"SS HEREOF, the parties hereto have Caused Most pts to ee duly acetate; and a :knowledge with All Iornalltles aid by I1�,�/ on rtA the is$ Set fo oppoilte their signatures 0Uel'AP by Developer gnetur< • Frans D. Morris oat. by gna[ura Developer r nteo Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga. Cal 7fdrn L A MunlClpal Corporation By. Mayor Attest: city CITA� Approved: — City Aetornay OEYELOPER•5 a ;NATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED r R -3. hnL� , 11 1 ��{J ✓ Lily I.1 l4,V.V4) LUVN'IGA S".EEO .G 7IVIS10:1 L'ICROM 'I%f •Et °lT FEE SCUME For leorve -en: .. S.i:aur at:r.t late• a -cc )F- Fil ae•:r e•� •.- '/ •rarv7 .0. 5 7•. _ VTE: Cam not ' c'ude current fee for 'm'- ) 't"'t ar nbeeMt Capolltf :1;"I Y - I "ICE A•nr•• L ° D.C.C. a_r5 . 3• C.F 24• gutter 7 25 D C.0 cm d- C F 24• g.t:ar 6. DO -- _ P.C.0 t.ra an 7 5.559 L.r C )en 4 00 _nee S., 4. 0•C.0 slcecala 1.75 •1r C0 S.F 0n.e Sodroacn 2. �) •ate S.F d• P.C.C. crass gutter (Inc curl) 3.40 _et C r Street ena.aalan 1 SO C r !toorted e'raiAbent 1.50 5,"l S.F Pre,arat," of smgnde 0.15 Ti - 5.99] S.F Crushed 299, Oise (per inn thlct) 0.03. 4 •..9 TOI A.C. (ore, 1300 tons) 27.00 T04 A.C. (900 to 1300 tonsl 3S.00 101 A.0 (SW :0 900 tons) 45.00 DP701 A.0 (under 500 :ens) 60.00 0• 51992 S.F A.0 (3• thict) 0.55 S F Catch A C. (trenull 1.7S I'S:5 S.F 1• tnlca A.C. owlay 0.30 _ a EA. Adjust seer Manhole M grade 250.07 _ EA. Ad3ast serer clean cat to grade 150.00 _ CA. ;0, -.St rate, ranks to grade 75.00 T EA. Street lights 1000.00 L.F BJrr'cadel fwterlec SSW Mln) 1.00 _ L.F 2 . a• rec*o,d natter 1.75 6.312 S F pan", of A C plrenen2 0.35 2.:cI L.F RCarel of D,C C :ure 3.30 _ L.F R"OV41 of A.C. Be'. 1.00 _ EA. Streit s'gns 200.00 5 EA Ref Ill end Costs 35.00 tj Concrete blot. all 25.00 S.F Retaln.ng hall 20.00 _ TON Aggregate las9 7 00 C.T Concrete structures 425.00 L.F 1B• RCP (2000 0) 29.00 L.F 24• RCP 11500 O) 35.00 L.F 36• RCP (20W 0) 49.00 L.F is- RCP (1200 0) 76.00 EA. Catch bat:n V e 4 2000.00 EA. Catch Mail" V • B' 2900.00 EA. Catch Own v e 22' 4500.00 -_ EA. Local ee;res5lol 4 500.00 _ EA. Local depression 12' 1000.00 -- EA. Ouncticn structure 5000.00 CA Outlet Structure. Std ISCS 1500.00 EA. Outlet structure, Std 1507 500.00 Ea. Guard Daft! 40.00 L.F Guard panel (rood) 25.0 ,is L.F Sa.cut 2.00 41A EA. Peaarell (43• .Ihg) 4000.00 Bt1 L.F Ree.000 Reader 1,75 ..,y S.F Lanaaapiny S Irrigation 2.75 Se) L.F Roll curd (P.C.C.) 7.50 L.l. L.! tMaaryto9nG C1acnlaQ 7 11 nrn ENGINEERING IISPECT103 FEE -52L SUB TOTAL 9 •RESTORATIOWDUMEAT101 CAS)1 I.ODD�i 0- CO:ITIRGEIC7 COSTS lis OEPOSIT IAEFU'tDACLE) FAITRFUL PERFg.YAIICE B44D (1Wf) '31!GOOON MOAISWTATtO:[ 50R[ts CASR) _p)1.1�7510.041 LABOR A40 KATERIAL Solo (50:) j:�• "-.=t to CltY of Rancho SuC3Fa.lg, tWnlcipal Coca, Title 1, Olaptcr 1.09, aOODtlnq Stn, rernaralno County Cods Tlc:es, Chapters 1 -S, a cash restoratlamIde 1 ,jela, de;,it sha11 be 0411 prior to lssuawl: of ad EnOlnetring Construction Parelt. -P SUBDIVISION 61AIAXTEE NO PERFORMAMSE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Coorcll L City of Rtheho Cueaeonge P 0. Bus t 27 Rancho Cacsm4nga, Califonia 91730 Gentlanen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Sectlon 66497 of one GIIIII.e -t Coda, tee undersigned herrby agrees that all oanueents any n on the final map of parcel V 1180 are to oe set and furnished b,r "a sued ri r's engineer or surveyor on or before as specified In the Engineer a or can Byers GorLITICILO Ann Wool to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements Specified In Section 66497, of the Goverment Code The undersigned hinds you herewith the sum of 6 1.750.OJ of a cash deposit. Said deposit to guarantee t at t "m ...Was bewr0 set and the notes furnished As above P,t. . On:zas DefQdFF0 the date sseaifled and that the en9lnear ar surveyor well be laid by the undarsigned. It is further urdersteod and agreed that In the event the undersigned falls to Complete the above reoulre... is within the ties specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Is authorized to complete said rt4ulrements or cause shoe to be Completed and the cost thereof it to be a charge ay 'In at sa ld Cash deposit, and the City of Rancho C4U:amonga Is authorized to mate the necessary transfer from said -ash deposit to tRr cn dtt for the proper City fund It Is further agreed that If thi undersigned does not present as idence to the City Council that he has paid 0At engineer or surveyor for the scatting of the final monuments, and if the en inter or surveyor gives the notices prescribed In Section 66197 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to sold tngeneer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein wide If the cost of completing said nqulrements exceeds the .mount of the cash deposit, the undersigned •grew to pay the difference wl thin thirty (30) days after receiving written stattment from the Clty of Rancho Cut 1PeClf7ing the a .... t of the differe nce between the Cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements Cordially. M '—. S i2rt: p(tauil a/ Ki.�aewe.i IVc Subdivider 29 ail G,.waq alci' L� i Address Cor1., Mosa 4. gzC,z C. Date wloaca ?or t9e7L The depositor of record (for return of any portion pf the cash deposit) mall be 2 aG Arrlr,,n,� MbS 3.s: sie.nl7 aA (k..e bo,ererl l,ne. Cgsd.. Klstnl•�9 a�sssb [AddressT- TD B sull" "II /ET /;IV FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED l r RESOLUTION NO. 16*-TP 01! g(, — / D d A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 8680, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 8680), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 8680, submitted by M d S Residential Development Incorporated, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the east side of Ramona, south of Base Line, being a division of the south 220 feet of Lot 6, Section 2, Township 1 south, Range 7 west, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to the Map of Cucamor ^a Land, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, Records of San Bernardino County, was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 8680 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, sW subdivider submits for approval said Final Map =" offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1 That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 86aO be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: V/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 7902, located on the east side of Mayberry, south of Nilson, submitted by John and Rina Ling. Parcel Map 7902 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 11, 1983, for the division of 2.3/ acrg� ,into 4 parcels in the Low Development District located on the east side &O"berry, south of Wilson. The Developers, John and Rina Ling, are submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $49,000 Labor and Material Bond: $24,500 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water D13trict. RECnNN WOATIOW It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 7902, acr• Ling said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. _Resp4ctfulix su itted, LOH B:da Attachments Sys CITY 0' RANCHO COLAYONGA 111VOTERENT AGREEMENT FOR PAACLI MAP 7902 ANON ABU MEN By THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered Into. In conformance with the revisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cuumoure. :Late a CalifOrnla, a municipal :OrIoration, hereinafter refw.r- ed to as the city. by and between sate City and aM and Al na Lino hereinafter referred to as the31'ne Oper THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real pro, arty In Said City located on the east side of Mayberry. sOth of Wilson ; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be .et by said Developer as orerequlsite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the eaacutlom of this agreament and posting of Improvement security at hereinafter cipd, and approved by the City A1.1154my, are deemed t0 be equfra.ent t0 prior completion oM_ said re lrement$ for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it if hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense 411 Improvements described on page 4 hereof Withi n 24 months from the date hereof 2 This agreement shall be effective an the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agra.mant. This agreement shall be In default on the day Iollev- Ing the first arniversary data of said approval unless an eaten. sion of time has been granted by .aid City as hereinafter Provid- ed. y The Developer may request additional tide In which to complete the Pfovi Sions of this agreement, in writing not lest than 30 days prior to the default date. and Inelvd'i99 a ftatuant Of clrcu.,%ancef Of Ea Ce$SItY for aseitlonal tide. 1n COnfIdON- tfon of su•h ngaas[, the City lesarres the rig ; to review the provisions hereof, Incliding Construction standards, Colt *Sri data. and cuff iq ltncy of the Improvement Security and to require adjustments thereto when warrarted by substant Hf changes therein. 4. If the Developer falls or neglects to Comply With the provisions of this agreement. the City shell have the right at any ti so to caafe said provisions to be completed by any law. ful means, and thereupon to recover fro, said Oeviloper and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred In so doing. 5 Construction permits shall lie obtained by the Devel- oper fro, the office of the City Engineer prior to Start of any wort within the public right -o/ -Way, and the developer shall conduct such wart in lull Compliance With the regulatioe$ Contained therein Non - Compliance coy result in Ste.ping of the wart by the City. and assessment of the penalties provided 6 Public right -of -way improremmnt wort required Shall be Constructed In Conformance with approved improvemant plans, Standard Specification$, end St.nddrd Drawings and any spacial /yq CMY avendmruts thereto Construction shall Include any transitions and /or other Incidental Wort deemed necessary for drainage or tian Public Shall be Errors corrected mUlpto^tonthe discovered direction during st the City Engineer gevised Wart due to said plan modifications shall be savored by the provisions of this agreement Inc Secure' by the surety coraring t,.e original planned Works 7 Vork done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly pursued to completion: the City shall have the right to sosplete any and all work 1n the event of unjustifled delay in Como ledon, and to recover III cost and ecpense Incurred from the Dave leper and /or his contractor by any lawful mean S. 8 The Developer shall be responsiblm for replacement. relocations, or removal of any component of any irr tgatlon water System In conflict with the required wart to the setisyaction Of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all oose rock and other debris from the public right -of -ray. to. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees. directed by the Come, file Develapmant Director. Y3 11. The improvement socuritf to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the torus of this agreement shalt be Subject to the approval of the City Attorney. Tha prin- alpal amount of said Improvement security shall not be I than the amount shown: -g- 1 y� FAITH-UL PERFARRAACE Type: ?011) Principal Asount: 19,000 Rase and address of surety: An ywrrw.. ,.•A.nr/ /..r. /w -rt IJI + J7P /� f. "f v �aFNNFN+ fA t� 911trC MATERIAL AND LADOR Type: OCSU P""IPSI As.Y.t: 24,500 miss and add .• of surety: w +/MN. ^••hRU/ r.ry /N.rr� /fffpl& /if /l I/2 /h rfpc 9Jd°t( CASH DEPOSIT MORUNERTATIOR Type: CM T< A. Principal Asount: 1,400.00 Mast and address of surety: 70//w z ir r:Ay% 2�rrr•»! J,1 fr rat. P,7/- TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCE6TANCE BY THE CITY IN NITNESS HEREOF, the p'rtles hereto have caused the pnstDts ,to be duly "",'ad and Ilk ... ledge •Ith 411 forsalitteflt rt9u1 Dl law OR the dates Sol forth opposite their s19,.tu... Date by /ifOl ,G'fy- Developer 9•� re J•H.t- e /.v s �r me Date 3 i - by Developer �e IAA iim r ae Accaoted: Citl of Ra0Ch0 Putasonq a, California A MU I-IV al Cdrppratl.n By: — Mayor Attest: city Clark ADDr.ree: fro. � //Sc ^'��tAn tYT`y tpr%�'ney DEVELOPER 5 SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED -3- sir C C S 5 1 1 33?-- _180-- - Mlntoebe to city AtrnWlm caner M rY Prior to v i� ? — COXTINGEKCI COSTS Ewa) FAI mFM EA EI 00 1100%) i4ne.o0_ 1ARR CITE �IERIK Glvttu SC 1100" pER"tT FEE so*,EV1E EACAOW"tht far I,.prb—nt: eeuuu T Due. � Clsr m ..-- mar• ille Ae erentn -� .. .,w NOTE , DNS not .rltleg pert FOICE N-OOAL /J1Eltt UNIT !TCM LEE 7.E5 _ L.F P.C.C. Vrb • 12- C.F 20 gatttr p,C,C, turb • B• C.F 24- gutter 6.00 s L— F P.C.C. arp only a SO --- L.F A.C. bey" P P.C.C. elCatlt 1.75 41"411 n4ss S F �— S e Dr1eg tpprpltA A- P.C.C. Croft gutter (Inc. Curb) 3.40 ♦A2-W 1 SO C C S 5 1 1 33?-- _180-- - Mlntoebe to city AtrnWlm caner M rY Prior to v i� ? — COXTINGEKCI COSTS Ewa) FAI mFM EA EI 00 1100%) i4ne.o0_ 1ARR SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0. Boa 607 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentleman: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of panel No 7907 are to be Set and tarnished by tt a su ♦ er s eng naer or surveyor on or baton April . 1 , ac specIVI4d In the EtFor:ar s or Surveyor's Certificate an agrees to furntth the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified fn IN it ion 66497, of the Government Code The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of S 1 400.00 at A cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee tW t see Panuoen s bef 6b6 sat And the notes furnished as above pro-Ided un:gq DHO the date specified and that the BOO Poor or surveyor rijT be paid by the undersigned. It Is further understood and agreed that In the event the undersigned falls to Cgeplote the above requirements within the tfse specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to comp, a to said requirements or cause them to be completed and the cost thereof is to be a charge against Said cash dine sit, and the City of Rancho CUCAROA98 is 49thcrlaed to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It is further agreed that If the undersigned does me. present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the tgineor or Surveyor for the setting Of the final monuments, and If the en ginner or surveyor gives the notice, prescribed In Section 66197 of the Government Code, the City shalt pay to slid engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit here In made. If tlu cost of campfoting said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to Pay the difference with In thirty (00) days after ucel♦fng written statement free .no City of Rancho Cue amonga speclf7Ing the amount of the of fferenaa between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements co- dially, •• .— 4 , Subdivider i34 — pg y Address �^1✓ «cP � i.IG ai7�o Date _ 3 -7ri6� Th• depisiter of record (far return of any portlan of the cash deposit) shall be Twrc 41V4, ,3z3r �cfoernr� Sf rfi� if[ 9.Jru ame — t NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED CUT AND SIGNED RESOLUTION NO. 6tlW"=04R 840 /D 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NO. 7902 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7902), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY '.HEREAI, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7902, submitted by John and Rina Ling, P..td consisting of 4 parcels, located an the east side of Mayberry, south of Filson, being .A division of a portion of the northeast 1/4, Section 26, T. 1 N. R. 7 W., San Bernardino Base and Meridian, was approved by the Planning Commission as provited in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7902 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for pVb use the streets delineated thereon. � s NOV. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as fellows: 1. That the offer. for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Nap No. 7902 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filad for record. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: NOES: ASSENT: Jeffrey K ng, Mayor /el 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 9537 LOCATED EAST OF VINEYARD AVENUE, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND NINTH STREET SUBMITTED BY EVERGREEN MORTGAGE CORPORATION. Parcel Hip 9537 was approved by the Planning Commission on March 26, 1986, for the division of 26.4 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District- .Nceted east of Vineyard Avenue, between Arrow Route'l.ry and Ninth Street. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9537 and authorizing the City Clerk to cadse same to record. *Respt s bm ted s, LBH:LB:ko /So CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDMMING DIVISION PPEM; PARCEL MAP 9537 ++rla- VICINITY MAP EXIT m. " A /15/ Tj I/ `' RESOLUTION NO. *004Pff* 81, - )0 'Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NSP NUMBER 9537 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9537) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9537, submitted by Evergreen Mortgage Corporation and consisting of 2 parcels, located east of Vineyard, between Arrow Route and Ninth Street, being a division of a portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8597 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 89 of Parcel Maps, Page 20 6 21 records of said County was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 9537 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, 8CYRESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 3 Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 9537 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King, Mayor — ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet-, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk Asa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1936 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Desigier SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AG.IEEMENT WITH MORSE C61-35 NG GROU 0 TN R CON U TIN - L.OR P AN Attached for Council approval is A consultant contract with Morse Consulting Group to prepare%reliminary plans and construction documents for landscaping reconstruction along Victoria Park Lane, from Base Line Road to Victoria Windrows Loop. Main objectives of the reconstruction plans will be to address the replacement of some of the tall fescue areas with hydroseeded wildflower mixes, and to make adjustments responsive to street reconstruction. Street improvements will be constructed on a separate contract. The contract includes review with both the Plar.ning Commission and City Council to approve final phasing and monumentation designs. RECOMMEXDATION It is recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Morse Consulting Group to prepare preliminary plans and construction documents for the reconstruction of Victoria Park Lane. Project to be funded with Victoria landscape assessment funds, in an amount not to exceed $15,380.00. Re ?bs ubm a ed, Lloyd ity LBH:lp:nas Attachments �S� PRGFESoiJNAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day if 19_, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corpor,tion (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and AOPSE CO:ISULTING GROUP (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT-). A. Recitals_ (i) CITY .as heretofore issued its Request for Propos-1 pertaining to the performance cf professional services with respect to the preparation of Preliminary Design with cost estimate, and construction documents for the reconstruction of Victoria r,rk Lane 7v ("Project" hereafter). (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the Performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CMOs Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NON. THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. I. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agrecment otherwise requires: 3/5/86 -1- /Stl (a) Project: The preparation of Preliminary Design, cost estimate, and construction documents for the reconstruction of Victoria Park described to Exhibit "A" Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to T1% be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, raps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit "B" Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, stole and CITY statues, re,ulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULIANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") Including a'1 supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in Project Schedule, Exhibit -2- ASS , 080. Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by - Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents to such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSUL.ANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, to necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement Iq the event any such other person -}dre retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrai that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CON'ULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $15.380.00" for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A ". (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C" either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no -3- 1156 event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Exhibits W. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the marimum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services es ��ysr set forth in Exhibit "A" heFeof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance w4th the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "Co. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. It) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, to obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all Initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. -4- /S % S. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, mall. models, photographs and reports prepared by Y CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be consilered the nroperty of CITY i and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and s other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and t materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications -z, by the CITY, its staff or uthorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized aCents. 6. Termination: ibis agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set fo "th in Exhibit "fi ", on a pro- rate basis with respect to the percentage of the protect completed as of the date of termination In no event, however, shall CONSULTA.IT receive more than the maximum speciflej in paragraph ? (a), above. CONSUL -ANNT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prep "red by -5- �J g CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement:City Engineer: Lloyd Hubbs, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite B, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730; Project Manager: Robert Mueting, lbrse Consulting Group, Northwood Towne Center, 4860 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 201, Irvine, CA 92720 -1999 Zy Any such notices, demands, i oices and written ramunications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -e ;ght (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. B Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or - ompanies acceptable to CITY nor .shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (d) worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall •urnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with tho laws of the State of California. -6- /S9 In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of th abor Code which require every employer to he insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance to accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement'. (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the s term of this Agreement, a CONSULTA,IT's sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal � injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's aetivljje� F146 B DCEO IHUOSrwo 00una6 (1{Sco,ebo•oo providing protection of at least One_44- •ien—Lb}}SnY (ii- OOO,elle.00 for bodily injury or death to any one person 9r for any one a e t or occurrence fire and at least4AS�3}ars (3000r88B:99} for property damage. 11 (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take and maintain at a s during the life of this Agreement o icy or policies of insurance concerning er and ons ( "malpractice ") providing protection of at least $250,00 for errors and omissions " practice•) with respect to loss arlsr om actions of ANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CiTY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in �Y � responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer, insured and all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation against CIT' and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies aye primary and noncontributing with any insurance that msy be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited td, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligaticn of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors _8_ under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the lar; ` the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: to the event any legal proceeding is Instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire A regiment: This Agreement supersedes any and all T$ -,z other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowl_dges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained to this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONS nn l�Jf�LKX� Date: M. �helC /G,Aq&" CITY OF RAIIC6 CUCAMONGA Date: Jeffrey ing. mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authe—TFF7rrt—y— cr Approved as to form: r �L _9. /�� EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES VICTORIA PARK LANE RECONSTRUCTION A. Phase One - Preliminary Design 1. Prepare landscape construction, planting, and irrigation base plans at 1• • 30' scale, utilizing "as-built' plans for VICTORIA PARK LAKE (provided by the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA). 2. Prepare preliminary plan identifying proposed modifications to the existing construction, planting, and irrigation. The planting concept will identify proposed areas for turf and ground cover. 3. Prepare preliminary estimate of construction costs. 4. Meet with the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT for review anQ._ Approval of preliminary plans prior to Y proceeding with tW Construction Document Phase. a B. Phase Two - Construction Dom'mnts 1. Prepare final construction plans (at 10 - 30' scale) based on the approved preliminary design, including the following: a. Construction layout plan for new walks, adjust existing landscape area drains and fine grading. b. Demolition plans. C. Planting Plans d. Irrigation Plans e. Details 2. Prepare necessary specifications to complete the final set of bid documents. 3. Prepare estimate of construction costs. 4. Submit plans to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT for processing and approval. a 1 C. Phase Three - Construction Services (Not a part of this contract, to be authorized y the CITY R, HU CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT during the course of construction. 1. Construction services to be provided by THE MORSE CONSULTING GROUP during the course of construction shall include approval or payment requests, preparation of approved change order, and site visits during construction. The following is a suggested schedule for site visits during construction: a. Construction 'start-up" meeting with landscape and irrigation installers b. Fine grading review c Hardscape layout d. Irrigation layout e. Irrigation pressure test f. Irrigation coverage test g. Approve contractor locations for specimen plant material and major plant groupings prior to planting. h. Pre- maintenanc 14a ]k-through i. Final walk -thro at end of maintenance period /�T 'Tai EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE VICTORIA PARK LANE RECONSTRUCTION Contract Initiation Prepare Landscape Construction Document Base Plans Prepare preliminary plans and cost estimotes Meet with City staff to review preliminary plans and estimate Prepare final construction documents and cost estimate Submit plans to City for processing and approval Isle /4,5� April 16, 1986 Week of April 21, 1986 Nration 2 weekc Week of May 12, 1986 Duration 3 weeks Week of June 9, 1986 EXHIBIT C FEE SCHEDULE VICTORIA PARK LANE RECONSTRUCTION Pavm2nt Phase One - Preliminary Design S 4,880 Phase Two - Construction Documents S 10,500 Fnase Three - Construction Services HOURLY TOTAL S 15,380 The City of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to pay Consultant as compensation for all authorized contract extension Or additional work not included In the Scope of Services heretofore stated at the hourly rates below. rA Landscape Architect S 67.00 per hour Designer $ 57.00 per hour Draftsperson S 44.00 per hour Field Observation S 57.00 per hour Special Notes A. Any additional meetings not specifically identified in the Scope of Work shall be in accordance with our Standard Hourly Fee Schedule. R. All items not specifically identified In the Scope of Work or otherwise ao.lressed herein are not included in this Contract. C. The CITY OF RANCIHI CUCAMONGA shall provide approved street improvement plans and "as- built• plans for Y.P.L. 0. Should existing field conditions vary substantially from 'as- built" plans for Victoria Parksoil Lane, revision shall be made to the •as- built° plans based upon our Standard Hourly Fee Schedule or additional funding authorized by the CITY OF RAMM CUCAMONGA. 144 Additional Services The following items shall 'not be a part of the fee identified in the payment section above, but shall be reimbursable to NORSE CONSULTING GROUP as follows: A. Agricultural soil suitability test at cost plus 15%. B. All printing and reproduction will be invoiced directly by the vendors to you. Should we incur these reimbursable expenses, we will invoice them to the City at direct cost plus 15% for handling. C Site visits as authorized by the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAfiWA in accordance with the attached Standard Hourly Fee Schedule. 0. Any changes to plans requested by the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA after having authorized preparation of final construction documents, and THE MORSE CONSULTING GROUP having begun work, shall be done in accordance with the attached Standard Hourly Fee Schedule or additional funding authorized by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1(o7 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI TONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd B. Ilubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer rAl SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FORMA FOR ARCHIBALD AVENUE TUNTMUMUR—OWUNTATS FOR ENTRY NU N N Attached *or Council apprppY�a1 is a consultant contract with FORMA to prepare a Phasing /Priority plan for the beautification of Archibald Avenue. The contract also provides for the preparation of construction drawings for entry monumentation at 4th Street which will be lighted entry walls with landscaping. Preliminary entry wall designs were approved by the City Council on December 18, 1985. The contract includes review with both the Planning Commission and City Council to approve final phasing and monumentation designs. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council authorize the Mfyor and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services Agreement with FORPA to prepare Phasing /Priority plans for the beautification of Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Base Line Road, and also to prepare construction drawings for the entry monumentation. Project to be funded with Beautification Funds in an amount nnn t to exceed $10,950.00. R ful ubm lied s City gineer LBH:lp:nas Attachments /{ 8 ie;., PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 19_, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as °CITY °) and FON:A (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT°). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of Archibald 'venue Beautification Phasing and Priority Plans; Phase I test estimate and the construction draw+ngs of the major gateways (•Project• hereafter). (ii) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: 3/5/86 _1 /(0 C (a) Project: The preparation of Archibald Avenue Beautification Phasing and Priority Plans; a cost estimate for `Phase I" and construction drawings for the major gateways described in Exhibit W Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Serves Such professional services as are necessary toy be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Protect: The date of completion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance b) CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit •B' Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit W and applicable with Federal. State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and document ,,Rreinafter collectively referred to as 'documents•) including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit •A• to CITY within the time specified in Project Schedule, Exhibit .2. %0 "0 ". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required -by Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said dccuments as are deemed necessary. CITY sha1T receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 02.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreeaent. in the event any such other pei_hs are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $10,950 00" for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and Indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made to accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A ". (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shalt be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detail•ad in Exhibit "C" either with respect to hourly rates or lump •mo amounts for individual tasks. In no -3- event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individuai task totals described in Exhibits W. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sera in exies; of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by ++CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A• hLrreof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in 3 accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit •C• Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITM a °revs to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit •A• hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other Information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such Information as is generally available from CITY flies applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be C011SULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. -4_ 1-2.1 S. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications.* by the CITY, its staff o authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, clams and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written 'Notice of Temir lion' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit 00', on a pro - rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CT -f any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, modals, thotographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by .5- 73 CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named Individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: City Engineer: Lloyd Hubbs 9340 Base Line Road. Suite B. Rancho Cucaconga, CA 91730; Project Manager, Rick Hume, F)RNA, 190 Newport Center Driver, Upper Gallery, Newport Beach CA 92660. Any such notices, demands, f�hvolces and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8 Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at ail times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Conoensatlon insurance: Before beginning work. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken au, full workers, compensation insurance for all persons whom It may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, In accordance with the laws of the State of California. -6- 7r a In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the periormance of the work of this Agreement•. (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout theme 3 term of this Agreement, a CONSULTART's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000,00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions (•malpractice°) providing protection of at least $250,000 00• for errors and omissions (*malpractice") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CiTY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in .7_ /-5 responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain lanjuage, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer, insured and all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified matl. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of ail such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the Insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and 4 attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or t " willful ar's or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this n Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the t maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part is or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are Independent contractors -8- /76 under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: in the event any legal proceeding is Instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all �� �j other agreements, either oral—or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any parts which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT Date: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: Jeffrey King, ayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut a et, ty Uer Approved as to form: .9. / 7;7 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SE7r.C_S ARCHIBALD AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION I. PHASING AND PRIORITY PLANS: A. Forma shall review the construction design priorities with City staff and receive base material. B. Forma shall prepare a phasing strategy for final design and construct rn based upon City objectives and available budget. C. Forma .Sall prepare a phasing plan which depicts the phasing strategy, which shall include Archibald Avenue sidewalk installation phasing (as provided by the City). D. Forma shall prepare a detailed estimate of probable construction costs for all Phase I items. E. Forma shall prepaCCgg..pp memo describing the issues related to the final designs of sc3sequent phasing such as: E.1 Areas requiring additional design E.2 Meetings with the community E 3 Additional base or survey information. 2. PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR THE R43OR GATEWAYS A. Forma shall prepare an outline working drawing plan and elevation of the Gateway Concept. 8. Forma shall review the outline working drawings with City staff. 3. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS: A. Forma shall prepare the constriction drawing package which shall Include: 1. Cover sheet with general notes and location 2. Construction Plan and Details 3. Signage Lighting Plan 4. Irrigation Plan and Details 5. Planting Plan and Details 6. Specifications B. Forma shall prepare an estimate of probable construction cos._. 128 4. BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES A. Assist the Client during the bidding process and the selection of a contractor. B. Attend pre - construction Job meetings. C. Assist the Client during construction by attending site reviews and answering questions regarding the working drawings and specifications. lW T� I EXHIBIT 0 SCHEDULE ARCHlb4L0•AVENUE BEATUFICATION Protect Se ue ence: 1. Contract initiation. April 16, 1986 2. Meet with City staff to review design Week of April 21, 1986 and construction priorities. 3. and pworking Duration: 2 weeks outline drawings (2.A) 4. Review outline working drawings with City staff. Discuss phasing strategy Week of May 12, 1986 as needed. S. Prepare phasing strategy plan, final for monuments' working drawings gateway Duration: 2 weeks cost estimate and mev: 6. Meet with City staff. Week of June 2, 1986 7. Presentation to Planning Commission. June 11, 1986 8. Presentation to City Council. June 18, 1986 Im =ass EXHIBIT C FEE SCHEDULE SECTION 1: Phasing and priorty plans SECTION 2: Preliminary construction drawings for the major gateways SECTION 3: Construction Drawings SECTION 4: Bidding and Construction Services TOTAL LESS CONTRACT AMOUNT S 3,900.00 S 1,980.00 $ 5,550.00 Upon Request S 11,430.Cn 480.00 (remaining in previous contract) HOURLY RATES: Fees for service as described above are based on our standard hourly rates in effect. Fees are subject to adjustment January of each year: Senior Principal. . . .. . . . . . . . $ 80 / Hr Principal . . . . . . . . . . . S 70 Senior Director . . . . . S 65 Landscape Architect / Director. . . .. S 50 Senior Planner / Senior Designer. . . . S 45 Project Planner / Project Designer. . . S 40 Planner / Designer. . .. . . . . . .. S 35 Support Staff . .. . . . . . . . . .. S 30 Deliveries . . . .. . . ... . . . .. S 15 Reimbursable Expenses: 1. Subcontractors: cost, plus fifteen (15X) percent. 2. Blueprint reproduction and photographic services: cost, plus fifteen (15X) percent handling. 3. Passenger cars: Twenty -five ($0.25) :ents per mile and parking fees when applicable. 4. Photocopies: Ten (0.10) cen', per page. /8/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12704 located on the west side of Center, between Arrow Route and Twenty -Sixth Street submitted by Deer Creek Partners WM Zj Tract 12704 Improvement Agreements were approved by the City Council on March 6, 1985. The Developer, Deer Creek Partners, submitted ar. agreerent and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $205,000 Labor and Material Bond: $102,500 At this tim , the developer is requesting approval of a twelve month extension on slid improvement agreement. KL MENDATIOM It is recommended teat the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting said extension agreement and security and ruthorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. *Aen'ts l s it ed, 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOs6A DsROYE7Sm EXTENSION AMEOM FOR Tract 12710 00 ALL MEN OF THESE PRESENTS: That this agremit Is suit and entered Into, in conforeancn with the provisions of the Subdivision Hao Act of tM City of Rancho Cucanorga. California, a aunicipal corporation, by and between tht said City. hereinafter referred to as the City, and DEER CReER PARTNERS referred to as the Developer. nTNESSM THAT. VNEREM said Developer entered into an lzp elent agreennt with the City as a requisite to Issuance of buildings pereits, and WHEREAS, laid Developer desim an utensim of tin to cowdlete the tan of the said Mgr vtomt agrement, NW THEREFORE, It 1s hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as folims: 1. The co pirtlon date of the tires of the said tglmewent agre obat is hereby extended by a period of 12 worths frov the date of City Council approval of said agreeiaet. 2. laetvala In lo "Mitt securities to reflect current leproveefnt cofly, mai, w turn.sneo oy arse wrelowr with We agreeent and snaT ba approved by the City Attorray. 7. The required bond and the additional principal mounts thereof in set forth on the &tied" shrt. A. All other tam and conditions of the said leprovwent agreennt shall rose In the sin. As evidence of understanding the prwisiws contained herein, and of intent to corply with are, the Developer has submittal the balm described taprovesent security, and has oiling hit signature, hereto: FAITIOWL PERFWIU'S OW Description: Additional principal Asountt MIA Surety: Address: MATERIAL AND LABOR 6O® Description: Additional Principal Anount: R/A Surety: Address: Adeltlonal Cash DeMOt: CASH DEPOSIT IdNEIITING SM Prtm.wl Amunt: R/A To be Posted prior to acceptance of the project by the City. NNf.......... N11NNN11NNSN1f ,1111N1N1Nr1fYfNNlMf1f1N1N1N CITY OF RMCHO CIMVION&A DETELOPFR: DEER CREEK PAI:T1IERS CALIFORNIA, a ounicipal corporation BY: ey King, Mayor r Attest: S. Wing, Jr. Beverly e , City MR— 'lot ROTE: /DDCTEILPM -S S161lgWE MST BE DOTMISEO �- 34186 / V RESOLUTION NO. 12 ( - / 0 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPRn'F' W EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TkACT 12740 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on April 16, 1986, by Deer Creek Partners as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Center, between Arrow Route and Twenty -Sixth Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said conjunction wi th the development of said Tractr127a0 and is to he done in WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councii or the City of"� Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement Extension Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: every A. Authelet.-TTEy-M-e-rZ e rey ng, Mayor _ l0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16. 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs. City Engineer BT: Lucinda Hackett. Assistant Civil E:.ginener KNOK: SUBJECT: Approval of Lien Agreement between Richard 0. Smith and Michelle L. Smith and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 6205 Archibald Avenue The attached subject agECe__�ment between the City and Mr. and Mrs. Smith provides for frontage 1ap'F is ucllL whicn includes curbs, gutters, and drive approach in return for a lien an the Malone property fronting Archibald Avenue. Said street Improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the reconstruction of Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street. RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Lien Agreement between Richard and Michelle Smith and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in an amount not to exceed $1044.00. Respe tfully submltte , LBH:L .bc Attachments / SS 1 R LIEN AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of ___, 1985 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY*) and Richard D. Smith and Michelle L. Smith husband end wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as OU''NER•) for the installation of certain public improvements Including, but net limped to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along a portion of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. `1 A. Recitals (1) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently contemplates the installation of, publi.: improvements along Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Umon Avenue to Ba•.yan Street (the "Lemon-Archibald Project* hereinafter in this Agreement) (ti) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -62, which is located on Archibald Avenue, which property is within the limits of the Lemon - Archibald Project. (iii) CITY is willing to include the street frontage Improvements along OWNER's property located on Archibald Avenue (the Smith Portion hereinafter) within the Lemon - Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by one between CITY and OWNER as follows: I. CITY shall include the Smith Portion as a part of the construction of the Lemon - Archibald Project and shall cause all necessary public igrovements to be installed to accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. The limits of said construe* •n are more particularly described in Exhibit •B• attached hereto. 2. OWNER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance pith the terms of ;his Agreement, CITY's actual costs incurred in constructing the Smith Portion. The parties hereto agree tha• the costs of said construction is S i C as shown in the Estimates of Construction attached hereto and identified as Exhibit .C•. 3. Upon completion of the lemon - Archibald Project, and the Smith tortion thereof. CITY shall cause �arrNotice of Completion to be prepared and presente�to OWNER. Upon presentatioPof sale Notice of Completion, OWNER agrees to pay the full principal amount of S IQ44 = �' on or before the 31st day of December, 1986. OWNER may, at OWNER's sole option, pay said amount of S 1d44 ° i in ten (10) annual installments to be due and payable on or before the 31st day of December during each calendar year commencing with the year 1986 In the event OWNER falls to timely make any payment specified herein, or in the event of sale of the property, the entirety of any amount remaining shall become due and Ppayable to CITY. Payrents shall be made to CITY at the Rancho Cucamonga City v Nall, Attention: Administrative Services Director, or at such othrr address or p person as the CITY may designate in writing. OWNER and CITY agree that in the f� ?' event OWNER opts to pay the above - specified amount by annual installments, that said annual installments shall be due and payable without invoice by CITY or any X other notice to OWNER. 4. CITY shall have and is hereby given a lien on OWNER's property (San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -62) to secure the full performance by o'.INER of OWNER's payment obligations set forth in paragraph 3, -V Na4 4o exceed. 77 above. In the event that OWNER fails to timely fulfill the payment obligations specified in paragraph 3, above, CITY may, alternatively, enforce and foreclose the lien provided for or sue OWNER on OWNER's personal obligations hereunder all of which payment obligatlors shall be considered personal regardless of whether or not OWNER may have or shall have transferred all or any of OWNER's interests in said property, whether by operation of law or otherwise. 5. CITY's waiver of any breach by OWNER with respect to any payment obligation set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any other such breach. 6. OWNER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agent's employees and contrartors such rights of entry and /or tMnorary construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the completion of the Smith Portion. 7. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 8 In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provisiol. of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys, fees and "sts from the other party in an amount determined by the court to be reasonable 9 This Agreement is binding upon dnd shall insure to the benefit of the Parties hernto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits 10 This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the Subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which /?F I is not embodied herein nor any other agreenent, statement or promise not contained to this Agreement shall oe valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall bs effective only 1f it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation .IEPIREY KING. );AYOR PROPERTY OWNER Richard 0. Smith Michelle L. Smith LAC i -:Zr , ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FONMt Bev.•rly A A thelet City Attorney City Clerk / x a HflfffffH Ht f +f+H1H Hff1Hf 1Y1rfHf fHHRR1R HHftff 1fH H1fRlRtfttffffRRRf STATE OF CALIFORN.. COUNTY OF SAN REAHARDINII ss AUTHELET personally knn ow to mC tc the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIUGA, CAL mo to be the persons who execu municipal corporation, and acknoa executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 COUNTY OF SAN DERNARDINO) On this the cq�,r ss Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of a municipal corporation, and known to within instrument on behalf of said to me that such municipal corporation otary gnature before T'V l�l proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evid.nce to be the Person(s) whose name(s) [pyg Subscribed to the within instrument and acknowleged that execut- -ed -it. WITNESS MY HAND AND O hl —RAL. Nota y S gnature Bavedy Ann Authmlml �'r NOTMr NfuC GYf.rq+ �i� rgtutr wrw rhro .. uw faa+fmwo mouwtr 1b CwW�re [Wis anti f. llf) NOTE: WHEN DOCUMEMr IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSNI7, THE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A LORPWtATIDN/PARTMERSIIIP ACKNOIR.EDGEItEMr IS /raD l a _ laru[w lug Ia —� 1 I )11r\ t[lw I is r � \ ose lrw•ror s/c•>•b•n °\ m J.o [[.[: rsa ` � rJlar :G•cr rss —.DO— ! —O MF I � ^'~` ORLON NJ19 n/IO f` n N r � L' •OlgO. .)� 130 i M � j2n4[ •l.Tr.�— rJttn9 C�llrr h Y✓nro)•,s.C•r J dd do 1[r.oJ 7Y9 dJtd) ro![e � (}l_\`1 J' s� i rte, ynrsr�o mwov�,y _ %J�O2i I.rtvv Y/ B rrrf •ra us.)1. v� �.1 F li>sr>itJJwOI/JY el.•Iett rtc n I 1 \1 b 1.11 I a ter, vi �s� I.O,zl. Must At „ 1 1 I \.i�lis OariiO � / b l � J•is :�lnn �'w!r a n iri.oa ti f, e lo;O10 13 3Ns I-r ev,7 NJIVVI .0Z I V15 Vlu 1 - — 'a EXHLam "C" CITY OF RAiINCHO CUCAMONGA b 3 PREUMWARY sn COST ES:::a:: Da": Z/ RICHARD 4- MICHEUL- bmITN by, - -'H-{LPN 201- 251 -/„ 7 40. OVAN 7 72 uu:- I PR:C L.F quo (�40 m 2 I 171-) ,RESOLUTION NO. E04—ie 024. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD AND MICHELLE S4ITH AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirnments for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Archibald Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, Installation of curb, gutter, drive approach and pavement located at 6250 Archibald Avenue, to be made part of the Archibald Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, Richard and Michelle Smith have submitted a Lien Agreement as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, 4VT RESOLVED by the City �nuncll of the City oft Rancho Cucamonga, Californ N. does accept said Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sane, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, �PPkOVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: ever y ut 9 e t, C yZ`%rk Jeffrey ng, ayor- 4 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 16, 1986 City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer ral Lucinda Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer Approval of Lien Agreement and Easement Deed between Gilbert and Barbara Ceballos and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 6255 Archibald Avenue The attached subject agreement and easement deed between the City and Mr. and Mrs. Ceballos provides for frontage improvements which includes curbs, gutters, sidewalk6Wd drive approach in return for a 10 -year lien and right -of -way dedication of the Ceballos praperty fronting Archibald Avenue. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the Reconstruction and Storm Drain of Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Lien Agreement and Easement Deed between Gilbert and Barbara Ceballos and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in an amount not to exceed $1340.00. Respectfully submi d, LBH. H:Dc Attachments M1 Y LIEN AGREEMENT c This Agreement is made and entered into this day cf , 1966 - by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as •CITY•) and Gilbert M. Ceballos and Barbara J. Ceballos, husband and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as Y "O1R1ER•) for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along r portion of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals ° ?� (i) CITY has prepared plans and specification! for, and presently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street (the 'Lemon - Archibald Project" hereinafter in this Agreement). i (1•) 014NER owns that certain real property, identified as qan Bernardino V ' County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -23, which is located on Archibald Avenue, which property is within the limits of the Lemon - Archibald Project. (iii) OWNER desires to participate in the Lemon- Archibald Project so as to dedicate necessary right -of -way and to contribute its pro -rata portion to the total costs of the Lemon - Archibald Project related to street frontage , improvements along OWNER's property located on Archibald Avenue (the "Ceballos Portion" hereinafter) (Iv) CITY is willing to Include the Ceballos Portion within the Lemon- Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW. THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as foli,es; Fi -1- /gs 1. OWNER shall execute a Deed of Easement in favor of CITY for street right -of -way and related purposes in form and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit •A•. 2. CITY is authorized to cause OWNER's Deed of Easeme.t to be recorded forthwith upon execution of this Agreement. 3. CITY shall include the Ceballos Portion as a part of the construction of the Lemon - Archibald Project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be installed In accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. The limits of said construction are more particularly described in Exhibit 'D" attached hereto. 4. OWNER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. CITY's actual costs incurred in constructing the Ceballos Portion. The parties hereto agree that the costs of said construction is S as shown in the Estimates of Construction attached hereto and identified as Exhibit •C•. S. Upon completion of the Lemon- Archibald Project, and the Ceballos Portion thereof, CITY shall cause a Notice of Completion to be prepared and presented to OWNER. Upon presentation of said Notice of Completion, OWNER agrees to pay the full principal amount of S I24Ls,(,c) an or before the 31st day of December, 1986. OWNER may, at OWNER's sole option, pay said amount of 5 134.0[,)4( in ten (10) annual installoents to be due and payable on or before the 31st day of December during each calendar year commencing with the year 1986. In the event OWNER fails to timely make any payment specified herein, or in the event of sale of the property, the entirety of any amount remaining shall become due and payable to CITY. Payments shall be made to CI0 at the Rancho Cucamonga City (lit Ac, axca4.d -2- 194 Hall, Attention: Administrative Services Director, or at such other adaress or person as the CITY may designate in writing. OWNER and CITY agree that in the event OWNER opts to pay the above - specified amount by annual installments, that said annual installments shall be due and payable without invoice by CITY or any other notice to OWNER. 6. CITY shall have and is hereby given a lien on OWNER's property (San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201 - 251 -23) to secure the full performance by OWNER of OWNER's payment obligations set forth in paragraph S. above. In the event that OWNER fails to timely fulfill the payment obligations specified in paragraph 5, above, CITY may, alternatively, enforce and foreclose; the lien provided for or sue OWNER on OWNER's personal obligations hereunder all of which payment obligations shall be considered personal regardless of whether or not OWNER may have or shall have transferred all or any of OWNER's interests In said property, whether by op ^.ration of law or otherwise. 7. CITY's waiver of any breach by OWNER with respect to any payment obligation set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any other such breach. 8. OWNER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and contractors such rights of entry and /or temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the completion of the Ceballos Portion. 9. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Las of the State of California. 10. in the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall -3- /99,7 be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the court to be reasonable. 11. This Agreement is binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 12. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or In writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effecW only if it is In a writing signed by all of the z parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY PROPERTY OINM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA Gilbert M. Ceballos CALIFORNIA, a municipal Barbara J. Ceballos corporation Jeffrey King, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk _y_ M BLS sdW�- APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ff NitfRiRf4Mt1t1RR4 f1ftfRRfMf1lltfANNf •fllftf } f f Nf1NR14tffffNNftllf f4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO ss On .19 ,before me the un ers gne otary u , c, persona y appeared and EEVERLY A. AUTHELET personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS MY NAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Notary Signature 15P, s STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) 3 ss On ' this the 74- '^ day. of . r( h � �' j(, before � 1 nS7T the u eers tgnem notary Puelic person ar al y appee �i r /P ' M^ v. lnS .� t alz— J. r e4-u Ho t._ persona I ly Knowmi to me ' proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence o be the person(s) whose name(s) ttre_ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowleged that0 „execute WITNESS MY NANO AND AL. CFFICIAL SEAL 111rfTN A ACOSTA u M• NOW, MU-C • C?Ur00. rzieausou0ceu= / ota Mr epinf 49 M 19 NOTE: WHEN DOLUNENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSNIp, THE ABOVE MMITR EMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTJBRSFIIP ACKNOIILEDBEf�I IS /1� 00•UZ v/ 3' •� 1 II p ®\J I SnollgT Mx — �� tiI �wltra0i wii +� Q 1) ;�c I II I x• . /11110101.Ox N I� ti I • .clarloi px©j i 11 m W1 COP /cr6` /�li B �a In 1. 1• � n aYLt —.L .I A�I 3 1{Pe I 1F I J 1 �I'l.•Si rNMMt�I' b� �� \ wPiC ♦I /Yiz 0 /I /I ='�I 1^ M I I� vWi •• K t v Sl /{i'If1JJ!' ! I II D/ e LC L % /L/ C <i I S/ 2 j w011ia01 ax to � I II n h I/ /y /l'7ytJ -II N• _I '� II R N m � w✓l.da/ �d daad./wPfB.J.rrr�wlnM.s,l � 11 � L � ,�IV� J d ib T'n O.YJYn/9L'O .sr IUiI \ u � I •mow• o3Nlt/.�Dr J s 51 (3 { 1 }�J�NL�t tl31VM .9 151% 0 ' / - 1 -�,.I �'r(ON90713Nf1 tl: u' NOW3- L I -- ss�ss, •, _ _ /3NI,1�J 31tlnt -0 15'1iiT r i �. y0. EXHIBM `Icl ff o4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA oc� 2L7 �S. E cZr-" --MIc D£-°.1A1-Mlr I I P C1RI6 4. GL= I '� �z tU FREUMINARr G ' COS: UTZI : Data: 31twvp GILBE.RT&BARBARA CEflAUDS By: —j_P-K — APM 201-ZSI -Z3 y0. i^=nDFrt-7! I MI: I U:7IT 7RI= I ,"CCST I I P C1RI6 4. GL= I 21D I LF I g� I z3A ro Z. PCC -IMEWAI-V ISLO 151 I 2- 0O sum t asaa� 3 I FCC- DRIVEA7MOACH I ZIA I Sr- I 3°° T_79ZM I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I .. o0/ EXHIBIT -A- .t „l[WSOlpt •N[ •'� lranOrm /T ;`,�>f�i•P'�: �[. CRr of RaOmc CLttmmp •• - ' .: •t� �.it�i �-< .t• '�F•'�41. }'� .:yc?tf,,�r1; n•: COYof Ruche Rlerio Caamo:yl, CA 91A0 V • ' '�. ,” - . r.. .'.� !,�''�..%U'Kr�i ;t Y.tG 6101'[ Ttli tNlrM61lgQ01Qy �'� EASENMNT FDR A VALUABLH ODNSIDUATION. • _ rtcdpt of -Wth 4 Mr[bF titvoM[ASd. • .•• t�, �[t��y •l'•t•"i . 04IEU[ H. Glrllot oea luMu J. GEO11oo. 6otGad ud vSfo a talot tuiou�+r����a��rp•�i' ✓.., • ^i;.f' 'Si`�ty. -�,.Cc t *,,;� _ _- . ,� «d ?:i614ri�!nA.O2Ri+esv: Of t ofty as,f laates ft • Mas Corpaltlm, m PAS@. r _�HStrut. hblle Qt11ltr rvl lolttod ruspotu i. CLStaall. tltb NUt tnlpopoq (o1MCiryafR[rcLO CUa000p,Cory L').�CtSfordr. "Fou"'r'. ..+Sti• .rcy�, :•• :YC'i �N.�., h•;./ "�ly� ,�:�•' !f••Ilo Vue S frt of W forth 70 lut of t6o South 262 fast of �rft!•rUr 29. roorhlll r"Cat oo rtnit CooProy So6df.Llon ft. 2, as aFl•V'�•Jcoratd 10 loot 20 of tlt /o, ltlo 061 rororat of sold boot'_ G i�= fa�Y h�GoGlu 620 gums fa[ ire or lno. % ..'a. m ' ' ai t . <� .. ' 1 ° -• ' /u ATuc Fmtltx .�.:.'i ^;�cn;�fi I 5' [YPLtn; r- .Abhlun. " -tkinry of < t.M1 /JGInA✓e(in0 jam. )hitd /T .Ff!'nC .�. -`'i y.,.M ri. '"'o'niwr.aNwy!«oocow •.' :' fY'',.. r.�.�t..��tlf+<:'!••(Jl�lhl -!'t Mr:� *go< ��. . ,��, •ml tt a Qvoac lmcrtmcsxltlr, ecr6el wl nose RESOLUTION NO. EQJEtB=k3R— fj(o — /t)S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT DEED FROM GILBERT AND BARBARA CEBALLOS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Archibald Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approach and pavement located at 6255 Archibald Avenue, to be made part of the Archibald Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, Gilbert and Barbara Ceballos have submitted a Lien Agreement and Easement Deed as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CaliforntlVdoes accept said Lien Agreement and Easement =ss Deed, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Californ,a. PASS-D. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. uthe et, ty er Jeffrey ng, ayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA as !Afo STAFF REPORT�f"� n o z A _Z i DATE: April 16, 1986 L977 n TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B Tubbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda Hackett, Assistant Civil Enginener SUBJECT: Approval of Lien Agreement between Alfred L. Malone and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 6245 Archibald Avenue The attached subject agrWment between the City and Mr. Malone provides: for frontage Improvement—which includes curbs, gutters, and drive approach in return for a lien on the Malona property fronting A ^chlbald Avenue. Said street improvements will he constructed in conjunction with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the reconstruction of Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Lien Agreement between Alfred Malone and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in an amount not to exceed $1270.00. +Resctfully su tted, Attachments RECORDING REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGt P. 0. BOIL 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 LIEN AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1986, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as •CITY•) and Alfred L. Malaria, (hereinafter referred to as *OWNER") for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks, and street r i pavements along a portion 63FArchibald Avenue to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.°_ f A. Recitals (i) CITY has prepared plans and spe:ifications for, and presently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street (the •Lemon - Archibald Project• hereinafter in this Agreement). r (11) MIER owns that certain real ` property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -25, which is located on Archibald Avenue, which property is within the limits of the Lemon - Archibald Project. j (111) CITY is willing to include the street frontage improvements along OWNER's property located on Archibald Avenue (the Malone Portion hereinafter) within the Lemon- Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows: 1. CITY shall include the Malone Portion as a part of the construction of -I- WTATA the Lemon - Archibald Project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be installed in accordance with CITY's plans and - pecifications therefore. The limits of said construction are more particularly described in Exhibit `B• attached hereto. 2. OWNER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, CITY's actual costs inured in constructing the Malone Portion. The parties hereto agree that the cost of said construction is S 12lep.rn t. as shown in the Estimates of Construction attached hereto and identified as Exhibit •C ". 3. Upon completion of the Lemon - Archibald Project, and the Malone Portion thereof, CITY shall cause a Notice of Completion to be prepared and presented to OWNER. Upon presentation of said Notice of Completion, OWNER agrees to pay the full principal amount of r 1,2,'10.00 * in the event of sale of property ror transFer of title, due and payable within 60 days of sale or transfer property. Payti,ent shall be made to CITY at the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, Attention: Administrat've Services Director, or at such other address or person as the CITY may designate in writing. 4. CITY shall have and is hereby given a lien on OWNER's property (San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. •201- 251 -25) to secure the full performance by OWNER of OWNER's payment obligations set forth in paragraph 3, above. In the event of sale the OWNER fails to timely fulfill the payment obligation specified in paragraph 3, above, CITY may, alternatively, enforce and foreclose the lien provided for or sue OWNER on OWNER's personal obligations hereunder all of which payment obligations shall be considered personal regardless of whether or not OWNER may have or shall have transferred all or any of OWNER's interests in said property, whether by operation of law or otherdise. S. CITY's waiver of •ny breach by OWNER with respect to any payment 1Kr%C>y. -3,0 2]c .p_ ao2 ' obligation set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any other such breach. - 6. OWNER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors such rights of entry and /or temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the completion of the Malone Portion. 7. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 8. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the c`irt to be reasonable. 9. This Agreement is binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 10. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreesents, whether oral or In writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which f is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this i' Agreement shall be effective only if i1, is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. i i, s ,c 7 -3- L J ' L" ✓a'fi i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. .- CITY PROPERTY OWNER CITY IF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Alfred L. Malone CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: Jeffrey King, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Beverly A. Authelet City Attorney City Clerk c�,r To -4- 00 a +» +•» r»» w�+' e»'++ i»» tA» a' �tkti- � »t» »� »r»t,tat »t»+.fwtt » :titi»»»» STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss - COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINJ On ,19 before me the Inidersig-n-e-d Notary Puollc. personally appeared N an A. AUTHELET personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of CHO the CITY OF RAN CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation ext•uted it. WITNESS MY HMO AND OFFICIAL SEAL otary gnatu$1 ure 7 �J STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BEANARDINO ss On t the 4�day, of _ �% :'! ✓C C T, PU( before me. VIfi n�iina ` the upuersigned notary ruollc Dersonally anneare proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence o be the Person(s) whose name(s) is subscribed to the withir instrument and acknowleged that OFFICIAL- SEexecute . WITNESS MY HAND AND AL. OFFICIAL - JUDITH S A ArCOAiA � y wov+rr wa A • a �L7/t -1 / G �• S^ KWWWaaCOUM iotary ,ignature U2 a awn A)R 2m 159 NOTE: WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ABOVE ACKNOALEDGEMElff IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION/PARTNSMIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS -5. L;L/ d f' `--s�` UWK5 OF MNSTRUCT'GU F �' EXt11B1T "B" � 1p 1 i � M M � W O �'� EXIll 30 WATERLINES - i i Q .0. --I f NO °31360_ ^ —w Zt °�p i•e rc ' 4 'may! I ji II J� li jl :< QaJ fl l ff ]Il•1 II QI I /11 lH 4 � �" \•,'Z n IMP � d <�-� �m •m �'o ia��'a .e j � °e)S ec •cwo,�, � b � un rED(RIBIT „ c •• r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OGUY' EML\0 DEP4�. ;z PP -14M W ARy COST IS.= MAIoNG APN 701- 251 -7 7 Dace: r" r�- 8Y: ft�1 IT IT-14 UNIT UN PRIC -c MMU T I I q..I I 9 °0 z I _ APPROACS 282- I �� I I I I I I I I I I �- I I I ti RESOLUTION NO. 444. 26 _ I C>4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI.Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT FROM ALFRED MALONE AND AUTHORIZING TPE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Archibald Avenue Reconstruction Project WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach and pavement located at 6245 Archibald Avenue, to be made part of the Archibald Avenge Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, Alfred Malone has submitted a Lien Agreement as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of, n , Rancho Cucamonga, Califor does accept said Lien Agreement, aLtherizes the =s Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986 AYES: NI ES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Bever y , uthe et, ty ar e rey K ng, Mayor 013 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c fpm STAFF REPORT �� C c r o S DATE: April 16, 1986 70: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROK Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Public Improvement and Dedication Agreement and Easement Deed between Rodney S. Young and Katny L. Young and the City o° Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9727 Lemon Avenue The attached subject Agreement and Easement Deed between the City and Mr. and Mrs. Young provldW for easement dedication and the remcval and $y replacement of existitorgg frontage improvements and landscaping of the Young's property fronting Lemon Avenue, to allow for the ultimate widening of Lemon Avenue. The agreement states that the City shali reimb,.r;e the Young's an amount of $568.69 for the right of way dedicated Said strt mprovements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Cay,.dl Improvement Protect for the reconstruction of Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutian approving the Public Improvement and Dedication Agreement and Easement Deed between Rodney and Kathy Young and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted, l./ L84 H:bc Attachments .i,. Q AI ,. RECORDING REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. BO. 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this 31st day of March 1986, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as •CITY,) and Rodney S. Young and Kathy L. Young, husband and wife, as Joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as -OWNER-) for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to_t curbs, gutters, drive aPIIroaches, sidewalks and street j pavements along a portion of Lemon Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (i) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street (the •Lemon- Archibald Project' hereinafter in this Agreement). (it) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 252 -42, fronting along Lemon Avenue, which property is within the limits of the Leman- Archibald Project. (iii) OWNER is willing to participate in the Lemon - Archibald Project so as to dedicate necessary rights -of -way for a fee, and to allow the removal and replacement of existing improvements at the ultimate location. CITY desires ° to acquire ultimate rights -cf -way and to reconstruct street improvements along i -I- Q16— said property at Lemon Avenue ( -The Young Portion- hereinafter) within the Leman - Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows: 1. OWNER shall execute a Deed of Easement in favor of CITY for street rio;mt -of -way and related purposes In form and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. 2. CITY shall reimburse OWNER an amount of $568.69 for said rights -of- way. 3. CITY is authorized to cause OWNER's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwith upon execution of this Agreement. 4. CITY shall include the Young Portion as a part of the construction of the Lemon - Archibald Project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be installed to accordance',Kth CITY's plans and specifications therefor. In addition, it is understood that the CITY shall include the following as part of the construction: a) Relocate mailbox on 1.5' x 1.5' pilaster with brick veneer behind new curb. b) Relocate fence pilaster with brick veneer behind new walk. c) Remove sod, regrade mounding, reloeate trees that are too close to walk, and replace new sod. d) Relocate sprinkler heads behind new walk, one for one e) Saw cut driveway at transition and loin with new pavement. f) Contractor shall be required to provide access for mail delivery and the collection thereof per Article 7:16 of the General Conditions. Page GC -14 of Special Provisions attached hereto as Exhibit '8'. 5. OWNER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, enr)toyees and contractors such rights of entry and /or temporary -2- M construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY'S City Engineer to cause the completion of the Young Portion. 6. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the taws of the State of California. 7. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce ary term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party to said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the court to be reasonable. B. This Agreement is binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 9. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between t e parties with respect to the subject matter "s hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained to this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the tay and year first above written. PROPERTY OWNER CITY Rodney S. Young CIrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Kathy L. Young CALIFORNIA, a municipal / corporation By n fFO -7e—trrey Mg. ATTEST : APPROYEO AS : very A. Auc a et ty torney City Clerk ^� -3- ,r17 4 r 4Hfffftt iH tMfH4HHfft4ftf4M ftt1f1fHH4ftHfH4fHH1HHH t Hf4tyHlfH STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN OERNARDINO ss 19 before AUTHELET personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Notary gnature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 1:�-w ?' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ss On this the 31st day, of March, 1906 before me, the un ers gna otary duglicj1personally appeared Rodnev S Yntinn n Ka h L. Young , x persona y nown to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowleged that the,+ execute�it,' WITNESS MY HAND AND OttlUAL5EAL. UFPlC1AL SP.AL JliDifii A Qdi1Y �r Botcq; nixie • raureBM• Notar 41, BENWOM �,n , y gnature `f w, Sys ype, am f. 190 NOTE: WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIp, THE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS for ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS _4_ a LFIgI 11T211UE IwAOYD¢117$ sctaAOme eloumee ee Qtr of Reecho C'M'M a �xara Aaceaom aIAA ro Qtr of Reecho Qxam,,ta P.O. an for RuNho rid••• -C CA 9:730 + Dace A,on tma lecarce uceAeotsasa �- EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE COt61OERA71ON.1miW of Sikh 4 beseby eclnelmrj. M.aMwl M 1/ 1 1 t 1 t EXHIBIT -A- O tMNt a n �eA f Neese CN�OSs. a Mmklgl Coeposalloo, u EAMIPNT for purpofea v X CLU"I . D6aRNd as Poogog WoWat7loNeO17 of Raeato Mmenp, Oo®V of Sea latiMbo`,�Iw.1 Y3, 4 That recorded In of Parcel 1 of Parcel Parcel M. 6I25, In lice city of Rancho Kvd,,.gof $a' Bern 1n Beat 60, Pats 70 of Parcel tea. in the Office of the County Recorder e1 • sai Bernardino County, State Of Ctllrornla, dascrlttd as /ellmnl ,i + 6e91nnIng at the northeast corner of amid Parcel 1: thence South ego 52'15• Vast, line of Lparallel eson lArameeas fhOon 3" saroelucel map. 262 feetttto the West line of said Panel 1; thence along said Waft line N 0• 29-00• east 7.02 fast the torterest corner of sold Parcel It thencs along the North 11ne o/ said Parcel 1. t N e9' 52'15• East 1.70 /Bet to the beginning of a tangent taro concaea to the South, hating a radius of 257.0o fast; thence, continuing along laid North line, Easterly along fa'd curve through a central angle of e' 16'27•; a distance or 10.88 feet to a Point of reverse cone, a radial of said onus at said Point of "ease ;1 curvature bean N e' 7978-8 thaste. continuing along said North line Easterly along said rertrse tarts, concave to the North hating a radius of 33.00 feet, 5) t8ipr1 -01n9 central angle of No q'36' a distance of 50,72 feet to the Point of k Contains 307.E swan rest. 9 r G Exhibit A Is attached hento and made A Part hermf by this referents Dared o"easAt AcIWOWLBOXMe1lT - sula Al a+ow mr_aNa le_,arona., teWlfl al LL We aedengM Naey P W or. vv,omPr taoaarM O eaeaurN anf.t beN o P'w lfememare NWta[NVrtrNpsr becwPVaatNidea.^nnrla�j1�� •banmee blhe enAle eutNONeartlarl,ot4dpN hew a,acaled N. riI7NL'BrarAW enanrW NW. . r "to lIs A relrtaAc, AtgprtfeCClprr. r,•.e. ass asM0 AtaaPM1tKO2al. x.e. rinlwn.er. 1 .1 �t 0 RODNEY S. AND KATHY L. YWING; J T. IRCEL /, PARCEL NAP 6125, BOOK 68, PAGE 70 p. A(. 0 ARCH/BALD AVENUE — - p N 0 °29'00 "E h 60. /2 N 0- 29,000E h 'V 89.521150E 702• �� 25' , o h L - -- 99.22' ,•,N 0.29,000E 92 20' T 3_ –_- SEE OETA/L A� SNEET o ;' to 2 tu N ` AREA B• 0 EX /ST R/W GROSS r 17,903.2 S.F. RA 4 E 2 TAKE - 3074 S.F. NET r /7,595.8 S.F. hPROP. R/W to 2 H SCALE O /"= 20' SEE D£TA /L B SNEET 2 I N 0.0¢. W - -• N 0'29'000 E /52 32' R.lp 51�• - PARCEL 2, RU. 6125, BK 68 P6. 70 P. N. 0 0 �D 33' d= 804623" d a 8043'360 d 804623" ' R r 267' R r 333' R r 333' L r 40.88' L r 50.72' L r 50.99' T r 20.48' T r 25.41' T z 25.54' SNT /OF 2 0 RODNE' . S. AND KATHY L. Y ,)UNG. a/. T z5' h 0 0.98' p t� N 0.29'00" E 99.22' -•• —. - • 92.20• -- - 7 02' /.30' B. C. n N 89.52'/5 "E ' - , ri N. W. COR. Q oevrvi . SCALE,/"= 2' O 3 a h h m m h N N yq 1 � b N E CDR q PARCEL / h 1 N 0029'00 "E W A = 0.02'47" R =333' m h N N yq 1 DETA IL A' N q 33' 1 Z PROPOSED R/W -LiEVSMG R/W INZ d = 8.43'36" R = 333' � a d = 8.46'23" R = 2674' T = 25.4/' h O L = 40.88' A = 0.02'47" R =333' T = 20.48' LLT = 0. 13' 2I J DETA IL A' N q 33' 1 Z PROPOSED R/W -LiEVSMG R/W INZ d = 8.43'36" R = 333' L = 50.72' T = 25.4/' P.O. B. A = 0.02'47" R =333' L =0.274' LLT = 0. 13' DETAx 'B' I SNr. 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT "B" / General Conditions (continued) 7.1S THE COATRACTOR'S REPRESE'ITATIVE The Contractor shall furnish the Engineer with the name, address and business and home telephone• numbers of the person responsible for the maintenance of barricades, traffic control signs, lights and other safety devices. 7.16 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY Attention is directed to Section 7 -10 "Public Convenience and Safety" of the Standard Specifications. The Contractor shall provide tempora -i "No Parking- and all other signs which may be deemed necessary for the safe and orderly conduct of vehicular traffic as directed by the Engineer and as specified herein. He shall also provide a barricaded area in the parking lane for pedestrian traffic during such time as the parkway is unfit to be used for pedestrian traffic. Construction operations shall be conducted in such a manner as to cause as little inconvenience as possible to abutting property owners. Water or cvst pallative shall be applied as necessary for alleviation or prevention of dust nuisance caused by the contractor's operations. At such time as driveways are inaccessible due to the Contractor's work they shall be blocked by t 2) Class II barricades or one (1' Class II 13 barricade and two (2) delin ators. Driveways that are ramped )r planked for temporary access shall be provided with a barricade or delinertor at each side. The Contractor shall give 24 -hour notice to affected property owners prior to blocking any driveway. The Contractor shall provide access for refuse collection and mail de' very on the regularly scheduled days. He shall also facilitate or assist in fle collection or delivery where such work is hampered by his operation. STREET CLOSURES, DETOURS. BARRICADES The Contractor shall not close m strict within the City of Rancho Cucamonga without first cotaining the approval of the Engineer. Barricading, traffic cnntrol and detour diagrams shall be submitted by the Contractor as required by the Engineer. The Contractor's attention is directed to the traffic control requirements of the Special Provisions. The Contractor shall provide and install barricades, delineators, warning devices and construction signs in accordance with the Modal Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH) prepared by the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association. During adverse weather or unusual traffic or working conditions additional traffic devices shall be placed as directed by the Engineer. All traffic signs and devices shall conform to the current State of California Department of Transportatinn, •Manual of Wirning Signs, Lights, and Devices for Use in Performance of Work upon Highways ", unitss otherwise approved by the Engineer. GC -14 i RESOLUTION NO. S@4. pR.. O (n - to 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND ncDICATION AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT OLEO FROM RODNEY /DUNG AND KATHY L. YOUNG AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. WHEREAS, the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, Rodney and kathy Young are willing to participate in the Leann Avenue Reconstruction Project so as to dedicate necessary rights -of -way for a fee, and to allow the removal and replacement of existing improvements at the ultimate location. WHEREAS, the City desires to acquire ultimate rights -of -way and to reconstruct street improvements along said property at 9727 Lemon Avenue. T. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council of t' Sity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Agreement and Easea •ed. authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs tnc Ity Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Berna ino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk Jeffrey ng, ayor ,a3 nm nc. D A XTPUn rT in A WMXTnA STAFF REPORT VITE: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM Lloyd G. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Vartan Vartanian, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for Improvement of Ramona Avenue in Conjunction with Tract No. 12532 Located Between Victoria Street and La Vine Street Attached for City Council approval 1s a Reimbursement Agreement with Archibald Associates, the developer of the subject tract, for the costs incurred in the construction of the easte ne -half of Ramona Avenue between the. limits of = 3 said tract, and the full st eet improvements from the southerly tract boundary southerly for approximately 146 feet. The above work is beyond the off -site street ir,proveaent requirements for said tract, but necessary for the safety of the traveling public. The costs have been reviewed and verified by the Engineering staff. Funds in the amount of $19,454.92 are to be drawn from the Systems Development Fund. RECOMMENDATIDN It is recommended that City Council approve the Reimbursement Agreement for street improvements for the easterly one -half -of Ramona Avenue between the limits of Tract No. 12532, and the full street Improvements from the southerly tract boundary southerly for approximately 146 feet, and authorize release of funds in the amount of S1S,454.92 from the Systems Development Fund. +VV:sr lly submltt d, Attacho•ents AGREEMENT FOR RAMONA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH TRACT NO. 12532 This Agreement is made and entered into this 16th day of April, 1986, by and between Archibald Associates, a limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as Developer; and THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as City. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City and Developer desire to mutually participate in construction of street improvements of a portion of Ramona Avenue between Victoria Street and Southern Pacific Railroad tracks; and '-X WHEREAS, the Developer has expressed its willingness to include said construction with the required improvements for Tract No 12532. NOW, THEREFOR!, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS; I. The Developer shall contract for the construction of the street improvements of a portion of Ramona Avenue between Victoria Street and Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, said Improvements as further described in City of Rancho Cucamonga Drawing No. 906. 2 The City agrees to contribute toward the cost of improvements of the easterly halt of Ramona Avenue from Station 17 +10.98 to Station 23 +77.88, and the full street improvement from Station 15 +65.22 to Station 17 +10.98 as shown on said Drawing No. 906 in the quantities described to the attached Exhibit •A•. Total amount being a lump sum of $19,454 92. 3. The City agrees to pay funds to the Developer In the amount of said share following completion and acceptance of above improvements by the C i Y. 4. Each party shall indemnify the other parties and its officers, agents, and employees against and hold thEa free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, acts of omissions on its part or on the part of its officers, agents, contractors, and employees in connectlot, with the construction. S. This Agreement may only be changed with the mutual consent of the parties in the form of written contract amendments. d�S 6. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contained herein are all subject to a successful completion of construction of improvements. !N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as the date first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. a municipal ARCHIBALD ASSOCIATES, corporation Developer by 3effrey K ng, ayor ATTEST: �' Beverly uthe et, ty erk APPROVED AS TO FORM: any City ttorney — aa� EI(RIBIT 'A" $ 4,996.40 A. Remove 12.491 sq. ft. of A/C @ 400 PSF B. Construct 5,542 sq. ft. of 1' A/C overlay @ 400 PSF 2,216.80 C. Construct 12.491 So- ft. of 4' A/c over 4' base @ 924 PSF 11.491.71 B. Adjust three sewer manholes to grade @ $250.co each 750.00 119.454.9E TOTAL: WAr Oa7 sv r CITY OF RANCHO CDCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer ral 1477 SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO OBTAIN BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT FIVE N The City's 1985 -86 Capital Improvement Program includes three traffic signals at the following locations: Arrow Route at Hellman Avenue, Vineyard Avenue at Ninth Street and Baseline Road at Beryl Street. These signals are proposed for funding from the 58325 Gtc Tax account. A fourth signal located IAYNaven Avenue and Church Street will be required to provide safe access to a great many new res'dences in Terra Vista upon the completion of the easterly extension of Churc� Street. The cost of this signal has been covered by System Development fees, paid as a result of the building of the Tarrd Vista Homes. A traffic signal at Haven Avenue and Leann Avenue will serve growth which has occun•ed on the west side of Haven Avenue, as well as new apartment units east of Haven Avenue. This signal will also serve the traffic from a single family residential development which will occur on the north side of Lemon Avenue, east of Haven Avenue. The cost of this traffic signal wil' be covered by the system fees paid as a result of these new units Total cost of the signal work is estimated at 5370,000, of which $210,000 would be from Gas Tax and $160,000 from Systems fees. RECOMMENDATION: It is reconaended that the attached Resolution be approved for the advertising for bids for the construction of five signals. Respectfully submitted, Paul Rougeau Traffic Engineer PAR:cv G+d 6 RESOLUTION NO. R p s A RESOLUTION OF THE :ITV CO'NCiL OF THE CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 'TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT BASELINE /BERYL. VIHEYARO/NINTH. ARNW /HELLMAN; HAVEN /CHURCH; HAVEN/LEMON", Idl SAiD CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CL;AK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cowonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tfie plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for gpffic Signals at Baseline /Beryl; Vineyard /9th; Arrow /Hellman; Haven /Church; men /Lemon's BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as rKwired by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this nmtfce, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M., on the 19th day of May 1986, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Traffic Signals at Baseline /Beryl; Vineyard /9th; Arrow /Hellman, Noven /Church; Haven /Lemon, in said City. Bids will ae opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, -Bid for Construction of Traffic Signals at Baseline /Beryl; Vineyard /9th; Arrow /Hellman; Haven /Church; Haven /Lemon'. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 2 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I- and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work Is performed, and not less than the gen -al prevailing rate of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per then wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per them wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with T3 he provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be ezployed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen In such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent In the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it Is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appenthces on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. �-3 O CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 3 The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirem�ts of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch Offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having do with working hours as set forth in Division sw 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Art1C(e 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California is amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of Me work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined to the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's band, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. X31 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 4 The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said wprk shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or a,v work or labor of any kind do,ie thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed In accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, or to whom a proposal farm has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The work 1s to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga an file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of 'ancho Cucmamga and payment�f j20, said 320, is nonrefundable. T, Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $5.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of . 19 ATTEST: City y +; le f c'—"— 2.3 .- Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Acquisition of Video Equipment for the Purpose of Personnel Training and Public Presentations In an Amount 1Jat to Exceed $1,150. As the City Council may recall, during the 1985 -86 budget process the acquisition of a video monitor and rer-rder was discussed and Incorporated in the budget. With the availability of Information ad training material on video tapes, the need has arlsen for the city to have the capability ofarexnting this Information. The proposed equipment to be purchased Is a 25" monitor, a video cassette recorder, and stand. The monitor Is being considered as opposed to a television set in that the monitor Provides clearer picture resolution and more clarity for presentations In larger rooms. The video cassette recorder is o four header which provides odditlo•.ol clarity for slow speed and replaying of tapes. The stand would be utilized to store and move the equipment. Prices were obtained on 25" monitors and video cassette recorders from six local vendors (prices are on attached page). It Is recommended the following equipment be purchased: Panasonic PCG 2530 for $499.00, video cassette recorder Sharp VC 58SU, $345.00; and stand - at $125.00 plus freight be purchased at this time. The total cost would not exceed $11150 including tax onset freight. Recommend approval of acquisition of video equipment for the purpose of perconvnel training and public presentations In an amount not to exceed $1,150. RARank a� i CITY OF R4NCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 3, 1986 T0: Robert Rizzo FROM: Wendy Ambrose 'PW SUBJECT: VCR, Monitor, Stand I have updated the price .,qyo[ea for these items, as per your request Unfortunately, Federated.7oesn't give quotes, Circuit City would only quote on the monitor and Beat could only quote on the VCR. 25" Monitor Circuit City K -Mart Troxell Comm. Gsco Fedco Beat Sylvania 26 RCA Sanyo AVH 260 ?CA TR622TR Sanyo AVM253 N/A $729 $569 $615 $579 $585 N/A Panasonic CPC2530 $499 VCR• VMS, 4 -head N/A Zenith Sharp VC58SU Zenith VR2100 SharpVC585U Panasonic $398 $400 $399 $345 $530 Stand (All price quotes per Scott Hacker of Photo 6 Sound) With locking Cabinet With locking cabinet for storage for storage 3 -open shelves 54" high 40" high 40" high Bretford HPVC 54E Brotford HPVC 40E Wilson MPS 48E $235 + freight $236 + freight $125 + freight CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: John R. Meyer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT Thc TAC Corporation is requesting release of a $2,500 Certificate of Deposit for the model home located on Lot 36 of Tract 12386 (8790 Knoliwood Drive). Staff has inspected the residence and determined that the model home improvements have been removed and the garage is restcred. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends release of the Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $2,500 to the TAC Corporation. Rtfully sub � Brad Buller City Planner BB:JM:ns Attachment 03s' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: AePtoval of Professional Service Agreement with Willdan Associatea for Performance cf Professional Services in Regards to Updating Assessment District No. 85 -PD under the Provisions of the Landscaping and Light ng Act of 1472. SUBJECT: Approval of PtofessionaWervice Agreement with Willdan Associates for Performance of Professional Services in ,egards to updating Assessment District No. 85 -PD under te. o•ovisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1472. Consulting Services are required for updating over 21,000 parcels within Assessment District No 85 -PD for fiscal year 1986 /87. Willdan Associates has submitted a proposal of $25,000 for updating services. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that City Council accepts the proposal from Willdan Associates and execute the Professional Service Agreement in the amount of $25,000. Sincerely, Ro� be7 zo- Assist t City Manager JBP:kmm 037 -AJ WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ❑ ENGINEERS & PLANNERS Mean W-C% vM.TSC lCCaM March 14, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attn: Mr. Jerry Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator Subject: No. r185 l e and Red PO Annual Update Fiscal Year 1986-87 District 986 -87 Dear Jerry: We maintain then funding Program opportunity for continita to assist improvement yof the your efforts to and In Red Hill Parks This proposal Is fur 'srvlcas to assist the City lof the updating Assessment DlstrKt No. 55 -F.,, Landscaping and Lighting AEC of 1972, Section 22500, at seq., Streets and Highways Code. There are approximately 21,000 , reels within the district which need to he researched. We undsntand that the update process may again require a large amount of field verification. Our, with the enclosed Scope of S rry benefit proposed fee to update e vic sis the Jump ssum tam ante amount of $25 000 We are prepared to begin ImmrdlatelY an this assignment d will pro ee upon your autnorization. Please return a signed copy at your earliest convenience. cc: Ms. Sandra Neely, Willdan Acceptance Executed on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga this _ day of , 1986. By Title ;u 2goS. ANAHEIM BOULEVARD. SUITE 100•ANAH^IM. P FORNIA92805•(714)4- 5740•(213)924 -1631 .319 SCOPE OF SERVICES - HERITAGE AND RED HILL PARKS: AD 85 -PD In conjunction with the uodato of the assessment district under the pro- visions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for Heritage and Red Hill Parks, Wilidan Assoclates will: Obtain, with assistance of City's staff, from County Asses- sor's office the computer tape which lists all parcels within the City. The tape will be converted to a disk compatible to Wllldan's computer. 2. By utilizing total dollar amount to be assessed as furnished by City, establish park assessment for each land use classi- fication The County Assessor's parcel numbers will be used as assessment parcel numbers. These assessments will be reviewed with City to determine If all parcels In each classification are receiving equitable assessment yj 3. Enter and edit City data contained on County Assessor's computer tapes. Enter other data for defining exemptions, and other special requirements Establish computer output format. Make nitial assessment spreads for City staff's re- view. Finalize cost and make final assessment spread. 4. Prepare an updated engineer's report which Includes formu- la for spreading assessments and estimated assessments for each land use category Revise report as directed 5. Provide sample resolutions for use and/or review by City Attorney. S. Present updated engineer's report to City Council outlining assessment spread methodology, benefits received by land use catagory, and procedure for completing collection of the district. 7. Attend City Council meeting and answer questions as neces- sary. Modify engineer's report and assessment roil as di- rected. S. Attend public hearing as City's representative to answer questions regarding assessment update process. Modify on- Sinear r report and assessment roll if required by City Council. 9. Program assessment data on to a tape compatible with Coun- ty computer for entering individual assessments on tax bills. D39 GENERAL - HERITAGE AND RED HILL PARKS: AD 85-PD The following Scope of Services presonts a detailed outline of the work tasks we propose to furnish In updating the project assignment for the City. It should be noted that, under this proposal, the City is to make avrllabie or assist the Engineer In obtaining the following it armatlan or data: 1. computer tapes of the latest equalized Assessor's roll for the City; 2. Assessor's maps for the Iat3st equalized Assessor s roll for the entire City; 3. If required, the location by strut address or Assessor's parcel number of the public utidty properties, other ease- ments, and rights -of -way within the City; and 4. total amount to be assessed for the parks (budget summary) for CollaZ06 Year 1986 -87. :t Dt/o PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AfREEMENT F I r . This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 19_, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as •CITY•) and willdan Associates (hereinafter referred to as 'CONNULTAIITO). A. Recitals. (1) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of Heritage and Red Hill Park As t pl trice update for fiscal year T ('Project" hereafter). (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Cormission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it it qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherulse requires: 7/31/85 -1- (a) Project: The preparation of Please see attachment I (Item Numbers 1 =9 and 1 -4 described to Exhibit "A' Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT it order to complete the project. S' (c) Comoletion of Project: The date of comoletion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings reqarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit 08" Project Schedule attached hereto. T. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a, CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance 41th Exhibit "A and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulation%, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. i (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents ") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in t a: Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit -2- 084. Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by r Exhibit "k'. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT c==ents F ° regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shat thereafter make sucn revisions 7 to said documents as are deemed necessary CITY shalt receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 02.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY (c) CONSULTANT shalt, at CONSULTANT's sale cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons a. may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement In the C event any such other p±rsonYare retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that nq subcontractor shall be i retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prier written approval of CITY { 3. CITY agrees as follows: F h(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $25,000 00 p for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover t the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, 55 including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to 4- CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with 9: the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C'. F (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in k accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CiTY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit •C• either with 4 respect to hourly rates or sump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no -3- .=)q3 1 event, however, will said Invoices exceed 95: of individual task totals described in Exhibits 'A" and 'C'. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 9S: of the maximum payable heceunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, togethe^ with all su;plemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to C:TY Final payment shall be made net later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as T `y s set forth in Exhibit •A' hereof, shall be paid an a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth to Exhibit 'C'. Charges for additl,inal services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shalt be paid by C'TY within a ressonab'e time after said invoices are received by CITY 4 C'—,T access :c orovide t0 CONSUL -ANT: (a) Informaticn and assistance as set forth in Exhibit 'A• hereto. (b) Photograohically reproducible copies o, maps and other intonation, if available, 01ch CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to comolete the project (c) ;uch Information as is generally available from CITY files appiicable to the 7rofett (d) Assistance, if iecessary, in obtaining information from other govdrnrental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibllity to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. �Y S. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of!CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by COt1SULTA.,T. CONSULTANT nay, however, make and retain such copies of said dcc•= ents and " materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site 1ntelded or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications T by the CITY, Its staff authorized agents witha,:t the specific written n consent of the CONSULTN,, shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and Indemnify the CONSULT114T against all damages, claims and tosses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written 'Notice of Termination' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified In said Notice. In the event this Agreement 1s so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit °8', an a pro - rats basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified In paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by -5- a�s CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this .Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth In this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: _7erry B. Pu lvood. Assessment Revenue,Coordinator, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. William Stoakey, Willdan Associates, 290 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 100, Anaheim, CA I 4 I , , Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after demosit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder In a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of Insurance: (a) Worker's Cpmpensaton Insurance. Before beginning work. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers- compensaton Insurance for all persons wham it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein. In accordance with the laws of the State of California. -6- In accordance with the provisions; of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commncing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Cede which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement•. (b) Pub�;_Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the �s term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal Injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take ou, and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ('malpractice") providing prote -Lion of at least 11,,00q.000 each occurance and for errors aggrega e and omissions (*malpractice") with respect to loss arising frog actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in _7_ --)L/7 0 responsible insurance companies licegsed to do business in the State of California and policies r_Wred under paragraphs 8.(a) and (t) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evideifcing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its Y� own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shalt defend, Indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or • property, incluolng the payrent by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, in:luding, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment): No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or abligaticn of performance hereunder shall be made, either tw whole or In part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be -8- 7 Q employees of CITY. ' I 12. Governinc Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed In accordance witq the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or, provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and torts from the opposing party to an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter her95e. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges tha54 no repres^.ntation by any party which is not embodied herein n6r any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shtit be effective only If it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: Date: 3 $e- CITY of RANCHO CUCA140NGA Date- Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor t ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, Cit—y—M—e-rF Approved as to form: Y t Attorney , -9- De15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCP.MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 10, 1986 TO: C!ty Council and City Manager FROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager •u BY: Jerry B. Pulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Establishing Annual Special Tax for a community Facilities District in the Amount of 5350.00 per acre. Background• On June 26, 1984, at an election held, the electors within the boundaries of the District authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. This allowed the District to finance certain p5411c capital drainage improvements within the District. Additionally, the electors approvau a maximum special tax rate of $550 per acre; this was to pay the principal and interest on the bond issued. Council adopted a resolution setting the special tax rate at $350 per acre for fiscal year 1985/86. Evaluation: The current rate of $350 per acre is still sufficient for the District to meet Its financial obligations for fiscal year 1986/87. Therefore a tax rate increase for the Community Facilities DistL£ct 84 -1 is not recommended for fiscal year 1986/87. R- commmendation: That Council adopt the Fesolution Establishing Annual Special Tax for a Community Facilities District. Addition- ally, the adoption of the resolution will maintain the special tax at the current $350 per acre. Respectfully, 406e Lzo Ass ant City Manager JBF:kmm vTJ1 RESCLUnan NO. 'Re —/ v 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU"dCIL OF THE CITE OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIF0I3IA. ESTAELISBIDG ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT WHEREAS, tba CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body "), bag initiated proceedings, bald a public heating, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the to" of a special to in a community facilities district, all an authcrized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 "0 being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities District obsll hereinafter be referred to as COMMON ITT FACILITIES DISTRICT 80. 94 -1 (DAWSEr DRAINAGE SYSTEM) ,S (hereinaf ter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, a: this tine, bonds have been authorized for issuance in the amount of $20,225,000 and Series W bonds have beau issued in the principal amount of $18,000.000; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of Californian bag authorized the Is" of a special tax to pay for costa and expanses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the cut fiscal year. NOR. THSREFORR. IT IS SERE3Y RESOLVED AS POLLOMSm SETTION It That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTI Z-Z: That the specific rate and axonat of the special tar to be collected to pay for the costs and expenst• for the aeat fiscal year (1986 -1987) Yor the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attacbed, referenced end incorporated tsklbit "A ". SECTION ii That be rate an met forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative bodye and is not in etas of that a previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. QS-1 SIMON a: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest no any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; E. Necessary replenishment of Fond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses oI authorised public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special tares shall be used as cat forth above. and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION t; The special tams shall be collected in the sane "near a ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be sub;ect to t same penalties and ease proceA re and sale In came@ of any delinquency for ad r valor" tun, and the Tax CollAtor is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costa incurred in collecting any said spacial tam. SECTION 6: All muies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond ftod and reoerva fund. SECTION l: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the cast County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the enact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A ". SECTIM S: The County Auditor aball than, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and /or amounts of such special tax installmente, interest, penalties and percentage@ so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the aspens" of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this a day of e, 14e. ATES1 NOES: AEF Dl T: EZ82SIT "A" The Comauairy Facilities District has been divided into two saner, 1. ZONE "A ": General areas to be served by the drainage facilities, exclusive of Lone -Be. 2. 201E "B ": A limited area, being 0017 partially served by drainage facilities. Zone "B" consists of those properties bounded an the South by FOOTHr.L BOULEVARD, on the East by ROCHESTER AVENUE, on the North by BASE LINE ROAD, and on the Vest by the prolongation of MILLIREN AVENUE. The rate, method a0d formula for the levy of the special tax for the respective somas, being Zone "A" and Zone "B ", is as follows, based upon a estimated bond amount of $18,000,000, payabl4 over a period of twamt7 (20) years: ZONE "A ": $350.00 PER ACRE MIS "B ": $350.00 -Kt ACRE for 190 ACRES. .A For the purpose of defining the maximum Special Tax. "ACRE" shall man acres contained in the area of the parcel as determined using the acres as shown on the latest Sam Bernardino County Assessor's "Pa. QT-3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1966 TOs Mayor and Members of the City Counc!I FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Develo:xnent Director SUBJECT: ACQUISITION OF LARGER LINE CAPABILITY C1,1J FOR APPROVED DATA MANAGMENT SYSTEM BACKGROUND: On December 18, 1985, the City Council authorized the development of o complete cafe management system in a phased progrom. Part of the FY 85.86 hardware acquisition program Included the acquisition of a mini- computer with the capability of aecommodatinq the system design. $167,000 was budgeted for Phase 1. Additional peripheral equipment, such as t72Ts, printers, plotters and digitizers, was envisioned for the following budget year (Phase II). On January 15, 1986 the City Cpyncil authorized the start of the program, which was the design study, to specifically de'f he the user needs of the departments and the spatial =� arrangements of distribution of peripheral equipment to the main unit. The design study has been completed and poses the question of which CPU hardware to acquire. The amount budgeted can only purchase a CPU having the capability of handling 24 lines. Because of the different buildings which various departments must now occupy, many of these lines will be used just to configure the peripheral equipment, leaving less lines available for actual terminal use. Given this constraint and the desire to make the System as usable as possible, the �uestion Is now posed, "Do we obtain a CPU with limitations in line hookups - or - should we now acquire a CPU which has greater copabilies7" If we don't, we could "get by" for a year and a half until the full systems' data is inputted. At that time numerous additional terminals will be necessary far use of the system and a request would be mode to replace the CPU, but we would have ulreody spent funds on one CPU already. EVALUATION: Staff, in evaluating this situation, feels that acquisition of equipment w th t -Mager capabilities now would be more prudent and responsible than to produce a more limited system and hming to replace It soon afterwards. The main CPU is the largest cost component of any system. It is therefore staffs opinion that inquiring a larger computer is o wiser choice. The additional cost of the upgrade (64 -line capability and expanded memory) is approximo sly $57,600. Funds are available from the Capital Replacement Fund and Redevelopmen Agency Administrative Fund RECOMMENDATION: City Council approve acquisitia, of a 64 -11ne capability CPU. h'Tecessary agreements will be submitted to Council for action at Its next meeting. Respectfully su fitted, Jock Lam, AICP, Community Development Director JL /kop CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Mee-rs of the City Council FROM: Brad duller, Cit Pinner BY: Otto Kroutil, Se. for Manner SUBJFC': GENERAL PLAN REVIS '.IS � i.,ucwaro�' 197 1 At the last two City Council meetings, the Council discussed potential revisions to the City's General Plan. It was the City Council's consensus that the Planning Commission be directed to examine specific areas of the General Plan, particularly as it relates to land use and circulation. Staff was requested to prepare ��eeppaper summarizing the City Council's concerns, Wn .l order to provide the Planning Commission with more specific direction, and to bring the summary back for Council review prior to submittal to the Plan Ing Commission. The attached draft memorandum to the Planning Commission outlines the reasoning and intent for the proposed changes as discussed by the City Council, and attampts to provide specific direction in issue areas to be re- examined. Please keep in mind that the draft simply reflects Staff's perception of the City Council's most important concerns, and is by no means intended to be exhaustive. Administrative revisions in other areas may also be necessary to keep the document internally consistent. RECOMMENDATION: The Counril should review .the draft memorandum to the Diann ng ommission and modify its content as appropriate, prior to transmittal to the Planning Commission. Res ctfully Submtlt� Brad Buller City Planner BB:OK:ko Attachments: Draft Memorandum ass — CrYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: The Planning Commission FROM: The City Council SUBJECT: RE- EXAMINATION AND UPDATE OF THC CITY'S GENERAL PLAN At recent City Council meetings, the COVncil discussed potential revisions to the City's General Plan. It was the City Council's consensus that the Planning Commission be directed to examine specific areas of the General Plan, particularly as it relates to land use and localized circulation. The City Council felt that the General Plan cannot be cast in concrete. If it is to be meaningful, it must be continually re- examined, even if just to reconfirm past policy. 1111pr The Planning Commission is best equipped to deal wfth this request. In charging the Planning Commission with this task, it is the City Council's expressed intent to assure that: Development in the City occurs at a pace and itensity which car. be supported by an adequate road system and other necessary Infrastructure and services; and that, 2. Land use types and intensities continue to be consistent with the Council's desire to create a well balanced community and the best possible quality of life and environment for the City's residents. In its review of the General Plan, the Planning Com ISSIon should focus its delihorations on the following issues: 1. Ability of existing and planned circulation facilities to adquately sustain projected development. 2. Re- examination of Multi- Family Residential designations and defliNtions (Medium 4 -14 du /ac; Medi= High 14 -24 du /ac; and High 24-30 du /ac). Examination of Office Professional land use designations in light of the emphasis on office uses established by the Haven Avenue Overlay District. �S� MEMO TO PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 If, after proper review, it is determined that changes in the land use or circulation elements are warranted, administrative and other changes in related areas of the General Plan may be necessary to assure internal consistency amonq a`1 elements of the General Plan. It is the City Council's direction :hat the Planning Commission review this request and work with staff to develop a program for addressing these issues within the next few months. Respectfully Submitted, Jeffrey King Mayor RON >j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 9, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City tlanager SUBJECT: STATUS OF FUNDING FOR UM jjgAAIL jU= �'. if A z .i 1977 M you are probably aware, the Box Vigaall Museum has existed on the Cbaffay College campus for approximately 14 years. During its existence the gallery bat been feuded primarily CATOUgb money collected by the college for specific class feet. The collkgs general fund has never boon used to fund any portion of the Hex Wignall Museum. The museum has also been able to operate because of donations from citizens within the Chaffey College community. The annual budget for opkaating the museum in 1985 vam approximately $60,000. Of that amouoc, approzimately $20,000 was received to donations vh. a the remaining $40,000 was collected from the class fees and tours which are givem of the college. These are referred to an "extended college foods ". The problem the ga Vignall Museum is ow experiencing is that the extended college, for a variety of reasons, may be unable to fund the mseum activities. This mesas that the means cost depend for its support upoi either the college general fund or supplemeatal funds received from the Community, or other donations as well as grants received. Within the eext few reeks, the Chdfey rollege Board of Trustees will be determining whether it is feasible to spend college general funds for support of the museum. According to Virginia Eaton, who is dire:tor of the museum, there is a good possibility that the board may be convinced that the museum is worthy of support through the college general fund. In addition, the museum directors are appealing to the Ban Bernardino County Ares Foundation. That organization receives a considerable owner of money and it generally distributes tbo funds to organizations needing support. The museum director suggested that if the City Council is interested in encouraging the funding of the museum, that letters be sent to each board member from the Mayor. We bave propared letters for the Mayor's sigasture, sad they will be sent out as previously direr red by the City Council. At this time it appears that City support may not be needed. However, if there is a abort fall in anticipated revenue for the next fiscal year, Mrs. Bees will let an how, sad I will met with representatives from all cities within the Chdfey College jurisdiction. If cities are to contribute, it should be done equally since we all bandit from the museum gallery and its related activities. As an aside, the fund raiser at Nordstrom's on April J raised revenue of about $7,500 for the Wiguall Museum. Q O STATUS OF FUNDING TOR BQ VICBALL MUSEUM April 11. 1956 Page 2 This aim is eerelT to let you know the status of the aivan sad its requests for funding through the Chaffef College Board of Trustees. Ve will keep you inforsrd if we learn of any am dewelopmats. LMV /kep tot Bill gollay ka M AM S� MY OF RAA'CHO CUCA3I0NGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 2, 1986 TO: Dick Dahl, Councilmember FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner,54 BT: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 1. COMPARISON OF APARTMENT AQ CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS 2. MINIMUM DUELLING UNIT SIZES Per your request, the following summary outlines the differences between apartment and condominium development standards in the City. With few exceptions, the CityApDevelopment Code doesn't distinguish owtership� j and rental units, i. condos and apartments. The Development Code deals with 'multiple family' units regardless of ownership status. However, there are some important differences, as follows: 1. PARKING STANDARDS: The Development Code separates apartments and townhouse /condo parking requirements. The number of parking spaces for apartment units is lower as shown an the chart aelow: CURRENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS SPACES PER UNIT A a�rI.J Townhouses/Condo's Studio Li 1 Bedroom 1.3 1.5 2 Bedroom 1.6 1.8 3 Bedroom 1.7 2.0 4 Bedroom 1.9 2.0 Visitor 1.0 per 4 OU's 1.0 par 4 OU's Currently, one covered space in a garage or carport is required for all multi - family projects. aGv 11 Continued Memo to Dick Dahl Comparison of Apartment d Cando Standards Minitua Dwelling Unit Sizes April 2, 1986 Page 2 2. BUILDING CODE PROVISIONS: The Uniform Building Code doesn't dlstinguls'r between apartments and condominiums per se, but does have more stringent provisions for attached units separated by actual property tines. Consequently, ownership units located on their own land require additional firewall separations, and separate services such as sewer, water, gas and upgraded electrical capacity. Apartments and ownership units which do not include ownership o° land do not have these additional restrictions. The attached memo by the Building Official further clarifies the issue. 3. CONDOMINILM CONVERSIONS: The City has an ordinance regulating conversions of apartments to condominiums. This ordinance provides that prior to conversion of existing apartments IVWbndom!nfums, the wall and ceiling separations -_s between units must be up to tho most current building code standards. The conversion ordinance doesn't establish condo standards that are more restrictive than those for apartments; It simply requires that existing buildings that were built to outdated standards be brought up to date prior to conversion to for sale units. 4. SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS The State Subdivision Map Act (which regulates the subdivision process 1n California) requires the filing of a Tentative Tract Map and approval and recordation of a final Tract Map prior to tho sale of any ownership units whether or not land is Involved, including 'airspace condominiums. Rental apartments can be built and finaled without a Tract Map in most cases. A legal lot of record or a Parcel Map is all that is required by State law. S. MiNUMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZES Attached, you will also find the results of a telephone survey relative to minimum unit sizes conducted last summer. In general, score of those interviewed indicated the intent for having minimm requirements was the desire for better quality development to those communities. I hope this information answers your questions. BB:OZ: jr Attachments d�p� STAFF TELEPhONE SU4YEY, August 15. 1985 C[TY MINIMUM WELLING UNIT SIZES CHINO No Standards Possible new standards now being considered IR414E No Standards - Just use UBC 1Gy FONTANA Dwelling Unit Size Based an Zoning as Follows R_1 Minimum Lot Size 7,200 sq. ft. - all R1 Zones All Single Family Units R -1 -c 1,100 sq. ft. R -1 -0 1,200 sq. ft. R -1 -E 1,300 sq. ft. R -1 -F 1,400 sq. ft R_5�850 sq. ft. if single family detachad 850 sq. ft. if multi - family R_3 850 sq. ft. if single family detached ( 500 sq. ft. if mutts - family MONTCLAIR* Minimum Size Based on Dwelling Unit Type as Follows: (a) Single Family Detached Units: .42 bdms - 1,300 sq. ft. ' 3 bdrms or more - 1,400 sq. ft. (b) Multi- Faai }��,Units (Apt. 6 Condo) i 1 bdm 950 sq. ft. 2 bdms 1.200 sq. ft. 3 bdms 1,400 sq. ft 4 bdms 1,450 sq. ft. * Minimum Room Size of 110 sq ft. ,;. * All dwelling units require 2 -car garage, no carports i ONTARIO NO Standards 1Gy UPLAND ZONE Single Family Zones R -S -15 R -S -10 R -3 -1.5 R•S -6 Milo- Family Zones R -M -4.4 R- M- 3.6(c) R -M -3.6 R -M -2.0 R -M -1.5 5 ecial A I Dwelling Unit Site Standard l s as Follows: MIN. LOT AREA sq. ft. MIN. 0/U SIZE sq. t. 20,000 2,000 15,000 1,BDO 10,000 1,600 7,500 1,400 6,000 S00 30,000 30.000 1s,000 16,000 7,500 15p. 0(a 3 Qr :.000 /du 1,000 /du 1,000 /du 1,000 /du 500 - Bachelor 700 - 1 Bdrm 800 r 2 Bdrm 1,000 - 3 Bdrm 1,000 sq, ft. for a I Bedroom plus 200 sq. ft. for additional Bedroom C QTY OF RAINCHO CLICAbiQ\T.;A STAFF RE. poRT DATE: May 14, 1980 EI Qi� u TO: Planning Commission 1977 TROY: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: marry K. Hogan. Senior Planner SUBJECT: 2041N0 ORDINA12 A14:NDt0,'4T N0. 80-01 - C0420 CO.YVPRSI04 - The develop - neot of a Condominium Conversion Ordinance ABSTRACrs This item has been before ewe Plaoaing Commission on two other oceasiona, March I6, 1980 and April 30, 1980. Thar. hava beta variois discussions over the need or lack of Head, for a Condominium Conversion Ordinance. The dis- cussion by the Planning Commission an April 30th seemed to focus a concensus of opiofon that a Condominium Convection Ordinance was needed but the degree of control was subject to debate. a� Since April 30th ve have nppted filing on Sumco po 1 and 11 by Levis games hive Submittal of Cra,kaide by C & L units or he co ersloomu condominiums. unity into condaminiuma. And additionally there are plans being prepared for the conversion of the duplaxes on San Beroardiuo Road south of the Magic Lamp. It should be remeubered that we have had only 1,200 apartment dwelling units (10 units or more) whereas, we have over 17,000 single family dwelling units. That breaks down to approximately 72 in apartments, and 932 in single family. The West End has approximately 702 in single family and 302 in multiple family. We have provided a corrected copy of the proposed ordinance that includes the ramments of the City Atrormy. Since there did not seem to be a unanimous opinion by the Plan.Ing Commission on what should be in the ordinance, we would suggest that the Commisaiou go through the ordinance page by page and let staff know what they feel should be kept or changed. Respec fully a b tied, \�R JACK LAY Director of Coemuhity Development JL:BH:cd Attachment Db q ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONVERSION OF APARTMENTS TO CONDOMINIUMS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows SECTION 1: PURPOSES: A. The City Council -i,ds a,d determines that the conversions of apartments to Cvmuntty apartments, stock cooperatives and condominiums affec, the public health, safety, and welfare; and that such projects, which are subject to the subdivision regulations of the State of California, should be regulated by. local ordin nce. The City Council determines a need to regulate the conversions of existing buildings to community apartments, stock cooperatives and condominiums so as to: r 1. Encourage a balanced supply of rental and ownership housing in the community and a variety of choices of tenure, type, price, and location of housing. 2. Maintain and encourage the supply of affordable housing, both ownership and rental, for low -and- moderate income persons and families, and 3. Promote the residential stability and quality of the commnity by developing neighborhood identity, discouraging displacement of residents, and facili- tating affordable home ownership opportunities and rental ownership opportunities for the coamunity. 3("S- 2 CThe C ty COurCil, therefore, states its express intent to set such standards and regulations necessary to insure that apartments and like - structures being converted will be in the best interest of the ccmmunity. SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS The words and terms used in this Chapter shall have the following meaning unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: A. Comr.,unity Apartment: Community Apartment as defined in Section 11004 of the Business and Professions Code, contaitg two or more rights of exclusive occupancy. u C8. Condominiums: Condominiums as defined in Section 1350 of the Civil Code: 'An estate of real property consisting of an undivided interest in common areas, together with a separate right of ownership in space.' C. Conversion: The process or act of subdivision, in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, of existing rental dwelling units into condominiums, community apartments or stock cooperatives. 0. Pest Report: An Inspection and written report conforming to the requirements of Section 8516 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of Californ'a including ! documentation of conditions ordinarily subject to attach by wood destroying pests and organisms. REM W1 E. —Project. Project means a condominium, community apart- ment, and stock cooperative. F. Stack Coaoerative: Stock cooperative as defined in Section 11003.2 of the Business and Professions Code: property consisting of dwelling units owned by a corporation whereby shareholders receive a right of exclusive occupancy in a portion of the real property owned by the corporation. SECTION 3: APPLICATION INFORMATION REQUIRED No Tentative Map for the purpose of conversion will be accepted for filing unless it islhecampanied by an application which in addition Y to the information required by the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Ordinance, contains all of the following information and documentation: A. Specific Requirements: I. The applicant's projected percentage of the existing number of tenants needed to buy their dwelling unit in order to mate the conversion project economically feasible. 2. Estimated market value of each unit; Q �, 7 I I `\ 4 3. Terms of proposed assistance, discount, or other Cfinancing program to be offered, if any, to present 'residents for the purpose of subsequent unit purcAase; 4. Proposed program of relncation assistance to be offered by the applicant, if any; S. Makeup of existing tenant households, including family size, length of residence, age of tenants, and whether receiving federal or state rent subsidies; 6. Proposed Homeowner's Association fee; �y -mss 7. Names and addresses of all tenants, when the subdivider can demonstrate that se.' Wormation is not available, this requirement may be modified by the Community Development Department. 8. The subdivider shall submit evidence that a certified letter of notification of intent to convert was sent to each tenant for whom a signed copy of said notice is not submitted. 9. A report of field test by a qualified independent testing agency as specified in the Uniform Building Code showing that the wall separation and the floor and ceiling separation between units shall provide L the same airborne sound insulation a: required by WE, a 5 the most current Uniform Building Code requirements adopted by the City. If the report s�cws that these standards are not met then the applt, ant shall Indicate that he will complete improvements necessary to meet these requirements prior to any sale of said converted apartments ;n cases where units are occupied by tenants, who have initiated a contract for the purchase of the units, the improvements for such soundproofing shall be complete prior to the sale of the unoccupied units. 10.-al4cpy of the proposed declaration of covenants, z' colditions and restrictions which will apply and which shall include an agreement common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping, together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance; a description of a provision for mair.enance of vehicular access arets within the project; and an Indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each unit. 11. A physical elements reports which shall include but not be limited to: (a) A report detailing the condition aW estimating the remaining useful life of each element of ME the protect proposed for conversion: Roofs, ` foundations, exterior paint, paved surfaces, mechanical systems, electrical systems, plumbing systems, including sewage systems, swimming Pools, sprinkler systems for landscaping, utility delivery systems, central or commun :ty heating and air- conditioning systems, fire Protection systems including automatic sprinkler systems, alarm systems, or standpipe systems, and structural elements. Such report shall be prepared by an appropriately licensed contractor or rrchitect or by a registered civil or structural engineer other than the owner. For any element whose useful life is less than five (5) years, Ca replacement cost estimate shall be provided. L (b) A structural post control retort. Such report shall be prepared by a licensed structural past control operator pursuant to Section 8516 of the Business and professions Code. (c) A building history report including the following: (1) The date of construction of all elements of the project; (2) A statnent of the major uses of said pro- Ject since constru :,ion; 020 6 7 (3) The date and description of each major repair or renovation of any structure or structural element since the date of con - structioi. For the Purposes of this sub - sr -tton r "major repair' shall mean any repair fo• which an expenditure of more than $1,001 was made; (4) Statement re;,arding current ownership of all improvemei-ts and underlying land; (5) Failure to provide .information required by subsections (1) vhrough (4), inclusive, `gi :s shall be accompaniod by an affidavit, giver under penalty of perjury, setting forth reasonable efforts undertaken to discover such information and reasons why Ulu information cannot be obtained. 12. Evidence that a notice of intent to convert shall be delivered to each existing tenant's dwelling unit. The form of the notice shall be as approved by the Community Development Department and shall contain not less than the following; (a) Name and address of current owner; (b) Name and address of the proposed subdivider; C d r e (c) Approximate data on which the tentative map is Proposed to be filed; (d) Approximate date on which the final map or Parcel map is to be filed; (e) Approximate date on which the unit is to be vacated by nonPurchasing tenants; (f) Tenant's right to purchase; (9) Tenant's right of notification to vacate; (h) Tenant's right of teraination of lease; (i) Provision for special cases; and (J) Provision of moving expenses. (k) Tenant's Right to Purchase. As provided in Government Code Section 66427.1(b) any present tentant or tenants of any unit shall be given a nontransferable right of first refusal to Purchasa the unit occupied at a price ro greater than the price offered to the general public. The right of first refusal shall extend for at least sixty (60) days from the date of issuance of the Subdivision Public Report or commence- ment of sales, whichever date is later, (1) Vacation of Units. Each non - purchasing tenant, not in default under the obligations of the rental agreement or lease under which he occupies his unit, shall have not less than one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of receipt of 9 notification from the owner of his intent to convert, or from the ('ling date of the Final Subdivision Map, whichever date is later, to find substitute housing and to relocate. (m) Other information as may be deemed necessary by the Community Development ^epar- ent. 13. Other information which. in the opinion of the Director of Community Development, will assist in determining whether the proposed Prole:t is con- sistent with this chapter. 13e m4 SECTION 4: PROPERTY DEVELOPMENi STAM3ARDS A. General Requirements: No Final Mtp for the purposes or condominium conversion will be accepted for filing unless the following requirements, which shall be conditions of approval of the tentative map are approved: I. Each dwelling unit shall conform to current noise and energy insulation standards required by the latest adopted Uniform Building Code or other applicable law or regulation. 2. Each unit shall have installed smoke detectors as required by the latest adopted edition of the i k Uniform Building Code. 3. Fr--each unit there shall be provided a miniasae of Z) 23 4 two covered, on -site parking spaces per unit in a 10 garage or carport, plus 20S of the total spaces l provided for guest parking. 4. Each dwelling unit shall be separately metered far gas. electricity and water unless,the City approves a plan for equitable sharing of communal metering. S. Each unit shall be provided with separate water shut -off valves 6. Each area for trash placement and pickup shall be adequately designated and all refuse shall be removed on a regularly scheduled basis from the imises. C7. Permanent mechanical equipment which the Building Official determines is a potential source of vibra- tion or noise shall be shock mounted or isolated. or otherwise mounted in a manner approved by the Building Official to lessen the transmission of vibration and noise. 8. Illiviinated addresses, and if found necessary by the Planning Commission, directory maps, for all units shall be prominently displayed from appropriate Public or private access within or adjacent to the project. 9 At least 125 cubic feet of enclosed, weatherproof, I lockable storage space is to be provided for each Ts :1 unit. This storage space shall be to addition to that ordinarily contained within each unit. 1, nay be either within or exterior to, but shall bear a- reasonable locational relationship to each unit. 10. A laundry area shall b, provided in each unit; or If common laundry areas are provided, such facilities shall consist of not less than one automatic washer and dryer for each five units or fraction thereof. 11. The applf -snt shall provide written certification to the buyer of each unit on the initial sale after �_tx conversion that any dishwashers, garbage disposals, stoves, refrigerators, hot water tanks, and air - conditioners that are provided are in working condi- tion as of the close of escrow. At such time as the Homeowner's Association takes over management of the development, the applicant shall provide written certification to the Association that any pool and Pool equipment and any appliances and mechanical equipment to be owned to carman by the Association is in working co'tdition. B. APPLICATION REQUIREHENTS The applicant shall provide the City with a tentative subdivision map in I a 2s ,_ 12 conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance and a C development plan of the project including, but not limited to. I. dimensions and location of each building or unit, and the -. location of all fences or walls. 2, building elevations indicating the type of construction material existing and proposed; 3. Typical floor plans of existing units with square footages of each room indicated and the number of units per plan; 4. location of common area and amenities existing or proposed; `y ?a S. location and dimensions of parking garage, carport, parking Carea, access -ways, and any other on -site area reserved for vehicular use; C. 6. location of areas for exterior storage space for individual occupants; 7. landscape plan per City standards which specifies proposed trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover, and Indicates exist- ing landscape massing. Species, quantity, and sizes shall be indicated for proposed landscaping only. i s 8. Any ether Information that the Director of Community Development deems :,ecess.sry to determine whether the proposed project is consisteit with this chapter. SECTION 5: ExENP'IONs In the event that any or the Property Development Standards required for the Conversion causes practical difficulties, are determined to be unnecessary or would result in excessive costs, the Planning - Commission may waive, reduce or modify the req,rirement. Waivers shall only be made for parking, laundry facilitlas, storage provisions for individual units, and noise anIbAergy nxquirements. SECTION 6: CONVERSION UNIT PROCEDURF. A. Mnual Limit. The City shall approve the conversion of no more than one -half (y) the number of multi - family rental dwellings added to the City's housing stock (1.e. dwelling units completed and ready for occupancy) during the preceding gear, in any one calendar year. The numaer Of multi - family rental units added in one year shall b^ determined as follows: from January 1 through December 31, the total numG3r of multi- family rental units given a final building in- spection and occupancy permit minus the number of such units demolished, removed from the City, or converted to non - residential use. :3 L If approval for a project expires -ior to recordation of the Final Tract Map fer that project, the ousber of dwelling units provided in the expired project shall be added to the allocation. in the cale.Aar year of expiration. For a one -time only basis, ', %Is ordinance shall establish dwelling units available for conversion in 1980. S. Time Limit. Any mild- family rental unit constructed after`,%e efrective date of this ordinance shall be allowed to conecrt to condominiums subject to the pro- visions of this ordinance, five years from the date of the final occupancy of the project. SECTION 7: ACTION BY PLANNING C"ISSION A The City shall make the following findings in addition to the findings otherwise required for a Tentative Tract Map in order to approve a Tentative Tract Map for the Purpos- * - ,)nversion: 1. the proposal is compatible with the objectives, Policies. elements and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable specitic plan. 2, the design or improvement of the project is con. sistent with apppl'iicaabble, general and specific plans. la 3. the proposai is consistent with the purposes of u,is .5 chapter. 4. the proposal promotes with the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. The action of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed in Writing to the City Council within fifteen (15) calendar days. SECTION 8: The Msynr shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the saaerto be published within fifteen ( 5) days after '%;; Its passage, at least once in The Daily Ro,ort, a news- paper of general circulation published in 0e City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the 'ity of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of 1980. AYES: HOES: ABSENT James C. Frost. Mayor ATTEST: Lauren B. Yasserman, City Clerk c?7 p is C C DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RAA'CHO COCA, \IONGA MEMORANDUM i� J February 3, 1986 L C9 0 LL C S Z 7 tarn � Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Man er Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner/ LAND USE RECOWNDATIONS FY THE CITIZENS ADVISORY Per your request, the fallowing is a chronological summary of the events initiated by the Citizens Advisory CoMMission's recomendati ns to the City Council relative to the City's General Plan: April acrosslgheloard r ductignsainedensity in resolution all our residentialsubstantial use t� categories from Low Neltia and higher. reques 17 19 e5 P1anningCComm Commission Council forereview and recommendation, (with Council review of the issues scheduled for May 15, 1985. May 8, 1985 - The Planning Commission. reviews the various policy options, and reaches consensus indicating that across- the -board reductions of density in ti,e General Plan as recommended by the CAC desirable alternatives, there was t a this Spli time. vote in However, as absence remaining inone Comissioner: two votes in support of Me alternative to look at sits on a case -by -use basis, and two votes in support of the no change alternative. Ms 15, 1985 - The City Council considers bootph the CAC and Planning isssuuesof owltl� oily unit garowth withsspecific inforwation requested of staff. The policy alternatives to be addressed and brought back by S for Council consideration include: A. The effect of financing incentives and multi - family bonds on growth in the City; B. Controls oil rate of growth /growth management; C. Controls on development through up- graded development standards; and D. Reduction of densittfs through reconsideration of the General Plan in specified areas or city -wide. Memo to Bob Rizzo Subj: CAC Land Use Recoamendations February 3, 1985 Page 2 Au ust 21, 1985 — Following a lengthy review of the report presented, The e y ounc opts not to pursue any of the alternatives presented. aatTon is to take no action and move forxard on other business. The attached materials include key reports and minutes for your review. QK:jr CC: Brad Buller `Spe Ban Coleman T,y C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM April 10, 1985 TO: Mayor and Hashers of City Council FROHs Advisory Cosission HemNrd 8Is Robert A. Rizzo lsslatamt to City Manager SOBJECTs Land Ox Recouendations by Advisory Commission The ldvlscry Commission at Its March 28, 1985 meeting recommended that the following information be forwarded to the City Counoll and Planning CoaxW3aion for consideration. Lj The Advisory Commission rinds and recomme= as follows, This City has long desired to maintain a rural environment to the maximum extent feasible. This City has allowed the construction or large amounts of high density dwellings during the past two years. There are many More high density dwelling projects approved or awaiting approval. Too many high density dwelling projects are inconsistent with the wishes of the citlxeos of this City, deteriorate our resources and produce serious comsequences Of crowding. Swift and certain limits must be placed on the proliferation Of high density dwelling projects. Therefore, it La hereby RESOLVED that the ldvisory Commission recosaends to the City Council and Planning Couission that the general plan and toning ordioaaces of this City be amended to effect a change in allowable density ranges along the following guidelines, Continued... C �80` C C April 10, 1985 2 Land Use Recocaenta!lons RANGE SIZE NAME VOV SIZE PROPOSM TL no change L no change LY q- no g °ha°ge no change M 8_14 5 -6 R14-24 109t3 I 24•30 14.18 19 or more CUP RESOLVED further that any Labalance this creates in the geheral and zoning plans should be id0uated by coamercLl and Sadwtrial changes. development' veopm further that the category •I- represents Intense i that it W permitted on no more than 1/10 of tf a's Of the naidebjdillt zoned land and that " be controlled by conditional use Permit standards which desam amelioration of all effects of high density to a degree that they have no greater lmoaot on the resources and adverse affects of crowding :hap would one dwiling unit to the acre. If You 1Saee any questions or coacerna regarding this matter, Please '091 free to contact me. RAhtmk ,� Lt% C C C ^ITY OF RANCHO CCCA`,iOSGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 8, 1985 TO: Chairman .nd Kerbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMISSION 1. ABSTRACT: This report outlines CAC recommendations on General Plan Fens tf y reductions, and notes the implications. It also provides Policy options to be considered by the Commission. Staff is S eeLin Pali t Y direction only, for recommendation to the Cit, Council. � y4 II. BACKGROUND: At a recent Citizens Advisory Commission meeting, a reso ut on was passed recommending to the City Council a reconsideration of the residential categories to the City's General Plan. Tha CAC Resolution, attached to this report as Exhibit W. recommends substantial across the board reductions in densities in all residential land use categories from Low Medium and higher. Specific CAC recommendations are noted below: Land .Use CateggEy Existino Pr000sed Tr� o L U2 -4 N C No Change — ange LK Nge M 4-8 5 -5 MH 8 -14 -g H 14 -24 10 0 -13 24-30 14 -18 In addition, the CAC recommended that for densities above 19 uni.s to the acre, A category of •I• (representing intense development), be created. This category could be permitted on no more than one - tenth of a percent (.1x) of the residentially zoned land in the City and would be controlled by a Conditional Use Permit process, which would demand •amelioration of all effects of high density to a degree that they have no greater impact on the resources and adverse affects of crowding than would one dwelling unit per acre". The reasons for this recommendation by the CAC are also stated in the resolution (please see resolution for specific text). They can be summarized as follows: c7 S 7 ITE:4 0 _ � i3 aawi .nrr nm /OHi Land Use Rec Jations ` 8, 1985 2 I. Des're to maintain a rural environment in the City. 2. Construction of large amounts of high density projects in the past; 3. Number of high density projects already approved; 4. Teo many such high density projects are inconsistent with the wishes of the residents of the City. The City Council has briefly considered the CAC resolution and referred the item to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation on the general direction the City Council should take on tits matter. The Item is scheduled for Council review (basic policy issues only) at the May 15, 1985 City Council meeting. II1. ANALYSIS: The`3ecemmendations made by the CAC have far - reaching } ap cat 0113 affecting just about all development related areas under the City's Jurisdiction. Adoption of the CAC recommendations as presented to the City would necessitate major changes in the City's General Plan and other regulatory documents affecting public policy. To impleme'.t the recommendations, the following plans and documents would require modification: General Plan: Revisions to several mandated elements of the enera an ueuld be required, including land use, circulation, housing, public safety, and recreation, to correct an imbalance between housing and comnercial;industrial uses, to reassess demand for Infrastructure, modify service provisions, etc. The changes would be required to provide Internal consistency among all mandated General Plan elements. This would be a major effort Involving substantial resources. Zoning (Develepawnt District) Nap• Modify designations for consistency with the nera an to assure balance among General Plan and inning Categories. Development Code: Restructure and modify most residential cztegor es to assure consistency with General Plan. Modify specific development standards to be reflective of new density ranges. Develop criteria for 'I• designation as recommended by CAC. Iss 6 6 C PLANNING C0`MSSI0' TAFF REPORT CAC Land Use Recodations �^ May 8, 1985 Page 3 Planned Communities /S ectflc Plans: The City's General Plan also contro s errs Vista- VictOrfa—,--ana Caryn Planned Commnit'es, to addition to the Etlwanda Specific Plan. All these areas are not governed by the Development Code, but have their own text developed M deal with specific circumstances. To cocplicate the mutter, the City also has development agreements•with the builders of Terra Vista and Caryn Planned Communities, which legally bind the City to ions -terii land use Commitments. The City's substantial financial stake In the Victoria Regional Center also complicates any potential revisions which eight result in substantial density decreases in the Victoria Planned Comunity. Other Issues: In addition to the regulatory documents, the City wOu7d nee to reassess its capital improvement program, parks progras and long -term planning for aWor facilities. Special districts providing services in the City would also be affected In their tong- rangaVInning and implementation. �20 All these changes would require a coardinated effort on the part of the City's various departments and special districts. CShould the Planning Commission concur with the recommendations of the CAC, staff will prepare a detailed work program to deal effectively with all the necessary changes and will incorporate these changes into Fiscal 85-88 program year for City Council review. IV. POLICY ALTERNATIVES: Should the Commission concur with same of the gams express y the Advisory Commission but find it-,elf reluctant to attempt A wholesale revision of the City's General Plan and related documents, other policy options could be considered. These options could result In an overall reduction in density with particular emphasis on those areas the Commission might consider appropriate. Tho first question that must be answered is whether or not whatever density reductions take place should occur citywide, thus affecting the General Plan, or outside of the planned communities only (i.e. to the area governed by the Development Code). Staff will need specific direction in this area, as well as feedback on the following options: PL DING COM.MISSIOr- Wr REP04T CAC Land Use Recoma...datIons May b, 1985 Page 4 9 Option A: Reduction 1n Specific Land Use Catem,ries DO This would involve rev ew Of na v duo ano use categories for Possible modifications. Since a specific area of concern to the CAC are densities above 19 du /ac, the Comeission may wish to consider modifying the MH and H categories as follows: Desleination Exinq Pro osed MH 14 -24 �stl au /ae - au ac Densities above 19 Wee permitted with specific findings only (CUP t) H 24 -30 du /ac 24 -27 du /ac Densities above 27 du /ac permitted with specific •indings only These modifications would result in narrowing the density range spread in the higher density categories. Further, the City would be in a position to require that the adverse affects of high density be ameliorated through the application of specific mandatory findings. Staff will need specific direction as to whether this approach is appropriate and if so, which land use categories are to be considered for revision. uun o - n,vucc,on le Jlte -) K1r1C ArNS Otml of er way o accomp sh ng an Quern ecrease 1n density would De to reassess the density designations for all vacant residential lard not yet approved for development. This would involve site -by -site review of upper density designations in various locations. The attached Exhibit •B' indicates all such land outside the planned comounities currently designated Medium. Medium -High, and High density, but not yet approved for development by the City. The Commission may wish to consider a redesignation of some of these site - specific areas to lower density designations. Staff will need specific direction on this policy option. Option C - fombinatlon of A and B Above jReauct an n ota dens ty categor es and site- sneclf le locations) This would involve an assessment of both land use category designations and site - specific locations, as described above. This option has the potential of reducing overall densities substantially without drastic changes in eltner the text and provisions of the Development Code, or wholesale site - specific designation changes. C O C PLATING COXMiSS IO' 'TIFF R°_70aT LAC Land Use Reco.dations May 8. 1985 Page 5 Staff will need direction as to the feasibility of this policy option. The final policy alternative for consideration is no change. The Commission may select this alternative if it feels the City's General Plan and Development Code are well balanced and that no substantial changes are warranted. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: At this point, staff needs policy direction only. Policy a ernatives and options available are noted below. Alternative 1: Reduce density per CAC recommendations. Alternative 2: Reduce density through: — 0pEio_n_K- Reduction in specific land use cote g0 ]as only; or Option 8: Reduction in site - specific areas only! Option C: Combination of A i 8 above. Alternative 3: Ro change recommended It is respectfully requested that the Commission provide staff with specific policy direction to be forwarded to the City Council. T� CIT & OF RANCHO CUCAMO \GA MEMORANDUM April 10, 1985 TO, Mayor and Members of City Council FROM, ldviaory Coasisaiem Mashers 8T, Hobert 1. Rizzo Assistant to City Ma -.agar Y SUBJECT: Lead Use Rteamaendationn by AdHsory Cossatasion The ldvisory Cosatssion at its March 28, 1985 seating recoesemded that the follcwing infOrmatlonn be forwarded to the City Council amd Planning Coamis2100 for consideration. The Advisory Codission finds and recoaaends as follows MW This City has lodesired to allntain a rural emvironmmt to the mazlsa extent feasible. This City has allowed the cvnatruOtioa of large asouett of high density dwellings during the past two years, There are way more high density dwelling pvojvots approved er awaiting approval. TOO many high density dwelling proiects are inconsistent with the wishes of the citixems of tbis City, deteriorate our resources and produce serious consequences of crowding. Swift and certain Naito oast be placed on the proliferation of high density dwelLtag projects. Therefore, it is hereby RESOLVED ttat the Advisory COCi13310n recOmnends to tmo City Council and Planning Coaslssion that the general plan and zoning Ordiaences of this City be amended to effect a change in allowable density ranges along the following guidelines, Ccmtinued.... a� a C April 10, 1985 2 Land Use Aeco_grdatlon3 RANGE SIZE SIZE NAME AOU PROPOSED YL no Chang( no cue ILN no change no change 4_8 5_g M 8-14 NH 14 -24 7 -9 g 24 -30 10 -13 1 14 -78 19 or sore COP RESOLVED further that any izbalance this creates in the general and zoning plans should be adjusted by Cors rolal and industrial changes. RESOLVED further ttat the category `1e represents Interne derelopsent, that it be Persltted on no sore than 1/10 of tf of the residentially zoned land and that it G controlled by conditional use resit standards which deaand aaalioratlon of all effects C density to a degree that the hate no greater "sPaot 04 the resources and adysrse y CrcwdLng than would one dwell afteota of dwelling unit to the tare. If you hays any questions or Concerns regarding this Satter, Pleays feel free to contact M. RARrak . __.....�.... _ - a�'a _ ..... _ C M jj VL VL Li two rL iti117i�11i �'.'•J ®�.i�. •'.t -,_' �� � nie w.+l-' r = -r- t L 'a W' � j �•L .�. -rte �_~}�t� -= " 1 j t1 .. �.y'i'•"y"tt, YC.Ll _a.L C ril L. 1111114 VISTA run IS iLz ���.��• fit! � x°'71 =3, u ••� .. is L•�I1:_ —�� Y • I\ �� • . �..rrr, ! y, a�� EXHIBIT 7 "B• a C t L. ENViRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -16 - ASSURED MINI. 0 - total In on o a min - storage eve opment, w t caretaker's quarks, totaling 32,8SO square feet an 1.44 acres of land in -the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) District, located on the north side •)f 4th Street, east of Turner Avenue - APN 210- 371 -03. (Continued from March 13, 1985 meeting.) M. VARIANCE 84-02 - ASSURED MINI - STORAGE • A request to allow a reduction to t e requ re m n mum an scape covsrago in order to construct a mini - storage facility on :he north side of 4th Street, east of Turner Avenue, In Subarea 6, Industrial Park designation - APN 210 - 371 -03. (Continued from March 13, 1985 meeting.) Rick Gomez, City Planner, announced that these items had been withdrawn by the applicant. By consensus, the Commission accepted withdrawal of the applicat•ons. NEW BUSINESS: N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES ENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -1S - ASSURED MiN nstr o, a m n .storage eve n t, an .44 acrees s opment tats g of land in the industrial Park (Subarea 6) District located on the no-th side of 4th Street, east of Turner Avenue - APN 210- 0 371 -03. Rick Gomez, City Planner, advised that the applicant requested Commission review of this item at a later date; therefore, recommended removal of Environmental Assessment and Development Review 85 -IS from the agenda. By consensus, the Commission removed the item from the agenda for resubmittal at a later date. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS 0. LAND USE ANALYSIS Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout invited public comment. Michael Payne, expressed concerns with the proposal on behalf 3f the Building industry Association (BIA). He advised that land use amendments such as those proposed by the Advisory Commission would cause serious impacts and that the BiA would consider litigation procedures should the City approve the proposed land use reductions. ' ( CPlanning Commission Minutes 4- May 8, 1985 - - I —_ ,� C Jeff Sceranka, 6211 Phillips Nay, Rancho Cucamonga, statO that the Citizens Advisory Committee retomenditions were an insult to those who worked.on the various City documents which make Rancho Cucamonga one of the finest and fastest growing cities in Southern California. Further, that he didn't have a Problem to resident to ictty- wide combat documennttsa which hook eight own rs area, planning, public hearings, and research was absurd. He advised that the City needs to stand by their plans and consider change on a case -by -case basis. Jim Dailey, expressed concerns with the propos W land use reductions an behalf oO the William Lyon Company, and urged approve) of the no change alternative. the art beforeethe horse. Further, thYtathaCcoouuldsnot agree basically should simply take the Development Code and other planning documents, throw them out and start all over. He stated that he could agree with looking at particular sites in the City or, a case -by -case basis, but reducing densities throughout the entire City would be the wrong approarh. In response to the CAC's Stout very few remaining. Further that it has not been the policy of this Commission to raise densities. He advised that his preference would be to recommend tome City Council the select% * of the alternative which would allow consideratfon On a case -by -case bins•, and for the Council to advise the Commission regarding which areas are to be further studied. Commissioner Rempel advised that not only the General Plan and Development Code would be affected, but also the Specific Plans and Planned Communities. He stated that he wcutdn't have a problem with looking at a site when it comes up, but didn't think the City needed to go looking for them. Further, that the City looked at the needs of the Community during the adoption of each of the plans and that they are documents of which the City and its citizens can be proud, therefore, would recommend the no change alternative. Commissioner Chitiea stated that sites steuld be looked at before a developer considerations on at site_ money into development, and would agree with falling into the medium and Site basis. drsft. She prefers that all vacant land similar to that of the 19th Street Corridor Stice oe considered to a manner Commissioner McNfel stated that his fnte•oreti:ton was that the alternative was either a reduction or no change !- :e:st:•as. Fe further stated that his concern was with the word •reduct'C11' and wes d prefer 'reconsideration-. Th at befog the case, he would opt for the •+o change alternative. Planning Commission Minutes _g_ may 8, 1985 A _ �`� C � c Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated that he understood the 8IA's concern, but Cany changes in land use densities would not be made overnight, but would be subject to advertised public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Additionally, that any changes considered by the City would be under the guidance of the City Attorney's office. Chairman Stout advised staff that the decision of the Commission seemed to be two Commissioners, himself and Commissioner Chitiea, in support of the alternative to look at sites on a ease -by -case basis, and two Commissioners, McNiel and Rerpel, 4n support of the no change alternative. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, advised the Commission that staff would convey the Commission's recommendations to the City Council at their May 15, 1385 meeting. C P. REVIEW OF E JESTRIAN TRAiI RE wormrNTS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12902 - an n the ery Low Resid�al District (less than 2sdu /ac), located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Almond Street - APN 201 - 071 -5, 6, 25, 26, 35, and 36�. o t Scott ef. ivedtrac Pafific stated concerns with trails requirements placed on this tentative tract by the Trails Committee. Jim Markman, City Attorney, advised that the Commission could listen to Mr. Scott's concerns; however, would suggest that direction not be given at this time since these are matters subject to public hearing. The consensus of the Commission was to Pefer discussion regarding traits fro Tentative Tract 12902 until such time as the tract comes before the Planning Commission as a public hearing. f f f f f AOJOUR.WENT• Motion: Moved by Stout, seccaded by wNial, unanimously carried, to adjourn. 10:05 P.M. - Plann ;vq Commission 1:;uned. Res ectfully submitted, �1 1c Deputy ecretary Planning Cocission Minutes -10- I May 8, 1985 _- -- CiTY OF RANCHO CCCA(J \GA STAFF REPORT f:P` o DATE: May 15, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMISSION Recently, the City Council requested the City's Planning Commission to develop policy recommendations relative to the Citizens Advisory Citizens Advisory drecommendations recommended reconsideration econsideration know, of the residential categories in the City's General Plan. In summary, the CAC recommended that substantial across- the -board reductions in General Plan T; densities be considereW The specific CAC recommendations are noted below: Land Use Category Es {st{n �'j� Pro ;hand NO Change L LN 2-4 No Change M 4-8 8 -14 5 -6 7 -g MH N 1424 10 -13 24-30 14 -18 In addition, the Advisory Commission recommended that for densities above 19 units to the acre, the category of •I- (representing intense development) be created. This category would be permitted an no more than one -tenth of a percent (.1%) of the residentially zoned land in the City and would be controlled by a Conditional Use process. The reasons for these recommendations are outlined in the CAC Resolution attached to this report. As perceived by the CAC, they are: (1) the desire to maintain a rural environment in the City, (2) construction of large amounts of high density projects in the past, (3) number of high density projects already approved, and (4) 00 many such high density projects are inconsistent with the wishes of the residents of the City. Staff provided the Planning Commission with a report, including an analysis of the implications of the proposed reductions (please see attached staff report). As part of the review, the Planning Commission considered sodescribed albasic iln alternatives. annnthese alternatives in detali the attached Planning Commission report. In summary, the alternatives which were considered by the Planning Con ;ission are noted below: �-..J ♦ w. - v _ �..� w .YM .-.,may A C C CITY COU:1CiL S :F R -e)Rf Land Use aec= •dar .s b/ the CAC May 15, 1985 Page 2 l Alternative 1: FWuce density per CAC recommendations. Alternative 2: Reduce density through- Option A: Reduction in specific land use categories only. Lion B: Reduction in site specific areas only; or Option C: Combinatiion of A i 0 above. Alternative 3: No change recommended to the City's General Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission discussed the matter et length, and reached the consensus on a number of items as below: Zs o The City should respect its •evious commitments relative to Permitted densities in the P1 led Communities, areas already approved for development, arc trees subJect to Development Agreements. o The City's General Plan and Oeve1 aent Code are the result of many years of comprehensive pia 'ng, public hearings, and effort by many individuals; residen , public officials and the private sector. Though some *difications might be appropriate, wholesale revisions t the General Plan and Development Code would not bu desirable at this time. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Though the Commission reached the consensus an the items above there was a split vote (in the absence of one Commissioner) as to the specific recommendation to be forwardee to the City Council. Canstqurntly, the following is presented for your, consideration: TWO votes for Alternative 3: No change recomeeno *his would in effect confirm the validity of the City's current eaeral Plan and Development Code. Two votes for Alternative 2, Option B: Reduct; of Density through consideration of site specific areas only. This would result in possible reduction in densities through the ,reassessment of specific density designations for all vacant residential land not yet approved or otherwise cocnited for development Part of the analysis would ba a site -by -site review of uppc density designations in site specific areas in various locations. X39.6 11 ■ CITY COUNCIL STAFF PYIRT Land Use Recoanendai. is by the CAC May 15, 1985 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff is respectfully requesting specific Policy direction, either Confirming the Planning Commission's position or selecting from the othoy plternatlytT�avai cable. submitted- r, Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report Exhibit •A• - CAC Resolution ExhibipWll" - Vacant uncomaitted Ian subject to theTV- Develop [ tnt Code. C A C C F... - - .t . I - - . - .a elate •) Jac[ L". Ca+rwty D.apoaort NDirenor. orec@d there van C. rnuant la dead to be de ft "Ll". We ar* ' projects aaadttN vbec tee q[ pre"' It lull wld Ilia N rgvadt penNgea to Pleased to deteJay .e. 4-4 chly I r,c if" b 'awr b I'd tea fn Necy d,.' vb(ch rttl t tea at ta' 4Ft1,Fo� s tors. to der to I'd as ror Jee Jaorte L. hOTIOt. 9FN by tutee t. Fo,.Nat DNI to u_atrtaa watt ,. ntwct ,.1 nett p t,rtlu .a a City tae pros'". tea tail they prp for ch. /uedtti Mat m warted veaweeal %y 3-0 Lit D LL n00'M-,ULCWi tT rISDLT e•Wtl I1 lb /w"la I tFIF •( Nllq rata s C@ald'l" wm.s to the tprl..r) Cmlula•'. nattdeNart by tt dal ad I, in ,.at to Ira Hr,t U, !Si) eaettai. IqH report y D[,. 4de[lt. $.obr Hdewr. Mtyw Nl4ts @Stud the adatlas tar Nblle (•eat. Ydr astai Ceaat't vale, On tier, deHd"t of Itla'aw. added tkl oaa of their e@d..nt rat, tort h•psNrd 'aw.d is ti /ld at tla gyer liens of • hor;ty. it vat ,.'l' ,elect that a dF•lgtr tdh the @lip• nrped, der ,.• h/tbrp Hain la dnecepwi, Altecrt fly". wkr of the Sib. a7 �4la ,odes. tNlnN of 'h• Ytltirl Ca obtln. �+• Jeff It ... ak, $"1 h1111N Way. Stews Fond C11tla Lyn Canty. Tbect Niel me wrtb•r "spread tra tea ?-bill. Mger Mlkls elecec abe cattle Fortin of the details. NOTICN. MFO' b1 Mlb•la. 8""aled by Nbl to direct staff to harp... far the City Caortit N 'a %1 Of 0014 'Pacific situ it the 17 -14. add it -:0 door,. u" uad/di dew ,a der•I @aaac rpe•"atu. to trot at ,.en tai nler tam t@ t ►' Hue as C@awpn dal the Maid to o look t• he., taw far awadtlrde Iuh to W city Cwetit lh a fiat oreltiw. to ildee O.hi S-0.te,.d that w Ina at ecorlq k "t ode. Mstiae carried v 'aelaeut:J •eels• tt. L[ffi7tt n a•a drnrL• a eeCar- jK}he to e¢t_ urn rnnN do 'he a..ttlatyttuta D- Newt) eet@et u, eLaro t_ m mstl , MDT10M. tlndd by kbl. 'ateNN it Writht to 'alkali,. the Mayor s@ nca the "open,. N eke J ✓u fndn'vca@rlty. Cbadpes the toNlae tarn.%'. Moues 4rrled aweWntty s -0, IC. AMLLML-SIUIUIIAIIC I a FiLTtl.. sayer R\dd a,settled that r• SO 14 wt a coals eutl's 'rl @r to d'aRwe ai tba kd"t. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CGCfa0.XGA STAFF REPORT August 21, 1985 Mayor and Members of the City Council Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE CONTROLS ON MULTIPLE FAMILY _ N I. ABSTRACT: This report contains information requested by the City ounc on possible ways to improve the City's controls on multiple - family development. Alternatives presented include the Gene al Pntives, Development management, and possible revision to;� direction as to alternatlivestto be explored further. requesting' Ii. BACKGROUND: over the course of the past several months, concerns over the rapid growth of multipple family housing, and apartments in particular, have been noted by the City Council. On different occasions, members of the Council requested that staff provide Information dealing with the number of apartment units built and planned in the City, data on the implication of multi- family bond financing, and consideration of minimum dwelling sizes in the City. In addition, on May 15, 1985, the City Council re, fewed rec nslderatioa Ofboverall General Plan densfities, aserecoommended by the Citizens Advisory Commission. The Planning Commission discussed the General Plah issue at length, and recommended against wholesale revisions to the General Plan and the Development Code. xeol7�ver, —if the City's General Plan is to be modified and densities lowered, the Coamissio;m felt such modifications should be based on a site -by -site review and analysis of upper density designations in various areas of the City. To date, no final action has been taken by the City Council on any Of these items. Rather, staff was requested to combine these various Items into a more comprehensive report, outlining the possible alternatives the City has available to deal wILh the question of multi- family housing in a comprehensive fashica. The purpose of this report is to present all these alternatives. C CITY COUOCIL STA Mult '70di iple Family 0r ioaoent August 21, Im Page 2 111. ALTERNATIVES' There are numerous alternatives available to deal with the rate, volume, and quality of multi - family housing in the City. Based on the Council's request, the following are presented in this report: 1. Financing incentives /multi - family bonds; 2. Controls on rate of growth /growth management; 3. Controls on development through upgraded development stanJards (including minimum dwalling sizes); and, 4. Reduction of density through reconsideration of the General Plan to specified areas. �y Tv Each one of these alternatives is addressed In the following t comparisons among the vvarious interest al and to allow presented in a separate section of the report. Additional supporting Information is attached in the form of an appendix. _ ,3OC) ... .?1 CITY COWICIL ST�Fr -POdT Multiple Family DA Iopment August 3 21, 1985 C ALTERNATIVE A. FINANCING INCENTIVES/M11LTI- FAMILT BONDS. Subsides of some sort, i.e. local, federal and /or state, have played an 1MPortant part in the development of multi- family housing in Rancho Cucamonga since 1978. For the ourposes of this discussion, these subsidies can be classified as follows: 1. Multi- Family Construction Bonds This technique is used to provide lower interest construction loans for the builders of various multi- family projects. The reduced interest rate is possible through the issuance of tax free bonds. The City's involvement in this process is through the issuance of an inducement re:o,.ut'•- lch is necessary for the bonds to obtain tax free st4t6 . ' 'ate, the City has passed such inducement resolutions onlj .gr senior housing; however, to Cgunty of San Bernardino has passed inducement 'may resolutions iii construction of other multi - family projects in Rancho Cucamonga under a cooperative agreement with the City. The advantage of construction bond financin g lies in the builder's ability to build a product for less. In turn, under state and federal requirements, 20% of the units so financed must be made available to people of low and moderate income (in 1985 dollars, this translates to ai annual household income limit of about $20,800 for a family of 4). Though cont stated availability construction ruction bond financing makes possible construction of projects which could not otherwise be built, it is clear that multi - family bonds have had a substantial inducement effect on the construction of such housing. It can only be assumed that the elimination of multi - family bond construction financing would have a substantial moderating effect on apartment growth. 2. Mortgage Revenue Bonds Unlike the construction bonds described above, Mortgage Revenue Bonds are used to tower mortgage rates for individual home bulMrs. In Rancho Cutamonga, Mortgage Revenue Bonds have been- usea been- us successfully, predominantly with single family projects. Rowever, several Multiple family projects, built and sold as condominiums, are also a part of the program. The advantage of this program is in the reduced Mortgage rates, and consequently the reduced monthly mortgage payments for the individual home buyers. The builder also benefits in that projects with aYail.�ble below market rate financing are easier to sell and +.e consequently less risky to develop. FA OR ?� C CITY COUNCIL STAF� '7047 Multiple Family De clopment August 21, 1985 Page 4 C This program applies to far- urchase units oniv and predominantly to single farm y res ences, an s probably outside the scope of the Council's request. Modification of this program would also have a substantial effect on future single- family housing. 3. Senior Housing Subsidies Senior Housing has not been an issue of concern in the past. This discussion 1s only included to complete the picture. The City uses Its Senior Housing Overlay District in conjunction with Development Agreements as a tool to provide adequate affordable housing for senior citizens. Senior Overlay provisions allow the City to provide varicus Incentives to builders of senior projects, from financial participation in the project improvements, availability of bond financing, to density incentives. The developer, in return, provides guarantees to keep the rental rates at below market levels fors a specifieftrlod of time. 4. Other Subsidies COther subsides Include Section 8 financing and other state and federal program: for looter income housing. Most of these are outside the City's Jurisdiction and scope of direct control. An existing City policy limits the concentration of lower income housing to 20% in any one project. In the future, the City will have an opportunity to comment on location and development of such projects. SUIWARY: Since 1918, 2110 muti- family units have been built or are aPPaPP —wing completion as rental housing. M these 2110 units, incentives. ntives. (i.e. about 54%) have received some *ort of special financing nce Though a cause and effect established. It is apparent the would not have been built withi particular concern with the Cow family rental housing, a confirm family constructlon bonds would program has recently been extend( 1988 and funding Increased to avoflable options Include: relationship cannot be firmly t a substantial number of units ut some sort of subsidy. If a cil is the availabifty of multt- ttion of Ccuncll policy on multi - e appropriate. The life of this d by state legislation to January $1.5 Billion statewide. The A. Elimination of future multiple- famlly bonds for use in the City; or CB. Issuance of Inducement Resolutions for Multi - family bonds on a ver__ v limited basis, i.e. for projects desi red uneer specified cri•er1a o —r in Particular locations. Staff could prepare such criterls for Councils review if appropriate. CITY COUNCIL STAF� 'PORT Multiple Family 0,. lopment P guess 21, 1985 ALTERMATIYE B. CONTROLS ON RATE OF GRMTH /GRhim MANAGEMENT Consideration and ultimate adoption of a Growth Management Ordinance would affect the pace at which development is permitted to occur. However, growth management controls would probably have a very limited effect on the total ultimate buildout of the community. Controls on the rate of growth are limited by the Government Cade to rather specific conditions, and must bb tied directly into the City's inability to met required public services or facilities through the normal development process. The attached memo by the City Attorney (Appendix B) explores the issue in greater detail; however, the major points are summarized below: 1. An ordinance limiting the number of dwelling units to be constructed in a given period must ba based an findings that the aromottggyf public health, safety and welfare necessitates`rx- such growth c3ntrols; 2. Such controls are necessary to meet specified public service or facility neees (such as sewers, schools, etc.); 3. There is no authority for a Growth Management Ordinanto which does nothing more than create a balance between multi.faaily and single family dwellings; and 4. There must be an overall public infrastructure or public service need tna use es growth management controls for all housing, not just any one type in any given area. According to the City Attorney City would first need to demoni provision of services to all single family. Only after e Provide adequate public servic could a formula be establish among the various resident apartments, condominiums, ate. need to reflect a tangible rel analysis, it is apparent that the •ate a significant problem with the residential development including ahlishing the City's inability to through the normal review process in effect creating an allutment 1 types (i.e. tingle family, Ion ship Again, a etween unitltypen would Andit demand on specified public services. s In summary, controls on the rate of growth are only possible under a growth management ordinance affecting in some way all residential development in the City. Given the effect on single family housing this alternative does not appear to be the most appropriate tool to deal with the issue of aulti_ family housing. CITY COUICIL ST;% -POir Multiple Family o .- loprent August 21, 1985 Page 6 C ALTERNATIVE C. CONTROLS ON DEVELOPMENT THROUGH UPGRAOED DESIGN Sy Upgrading of current Development Standards for multiple family projects could affect the pace, quality, and the ultimate buildout 'evels, depending on the extent of modifications considered. This section provides An outline of revisions to the Development Standards which could be consideretl. Topics covered include: minimum dwelling unit sizes, open space requirements, building separation, recreation amenities, architecture, parking requirements, and building code provisions. With exception of the building code, all the of sections pertain to the Development Code Similar amendments could be specified for the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Terra Vista and Victoria Planned Communities, within the limitation set forth by previous agreements. Dwelling Unit Family nSiizresftltiole nearly constructedsuaifd conducteunits tto available) ntmwast recently determine the range of dwelling unit sizes, average size, and unit mix as indicated on the following table: C NEW MULTI- FAMILY UNITS FOR RENT UNIT SIZE AND NIX Studio 1 -Bdrm 24drm 3-Bdrm No. of Oil'$ 82 660 1093 112 (1947 Total) % of Totdl Units 4% 34% 56% 6% (i.e. unit mix) Size Range 475 -504 580 -790 731 -1133 1030 -1225 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Average Size 493 670 883 11 ?6 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. The Development Code does not establish c minimum size for multi - minimum unit sizeshecouldebecestablished ,tPossiibly� based on the t » Tn nuober of bedrooms, if appropriate. a� 4 CITY C01 \CiL STRF -PORT Multiple Family D - topment August 21, 1985 Page 7 Dwelling Unit Sizes /Single Family A related item requested for Council consideration is minimum sizes for single family homes. Though this item does not directly relate to the Issue of multiple family housing, it could be considered in conjunction with size limitat.ons on multiple family units should the Council so desire. The Development Code currently has a 900 square foot minimum standard, unless a CUP is approved for smaller units. A survey of unit sizes approved by the City in the three single family districts (VL, L, LMl Indicated the following typical ranges: LM District t 900_1600 sq. ft. L District t 1200 -1900 sq. ft. VL District t 1800 sq. ft, b up An exception to this is the smallest phase of victoria, with sous 760 square foot homes built prior to the adoption of the 900 sgiares=j foot minimum stTibfird. The results of a phone survey of the cities of Chino, Irvine, Fontana, Montclair, Ontario and Upland are attached in Appendix C. Controls on minim= dwelling unit sizes very based on local conditions and policy; they vary from rather restrictive (Upland), to no standards at all (Irvine, Chino). Though it has no minimum standards currently in effect, Chino is now considering minimum dwelling unit standards. Me% stri r.rds for minimum unit size Could be established with Council's direction, either for all residential types, or for multiple family units only. Open Space Requirements The D':vetopm -nt Code Currently requires 30% Common open space for 35% Common projects ander the Basic Development Standards, and Optional Development Standards. -f�Inl additions approved under the requirements (patios or balconies) range from �1501t t225pfeetpfor ground floor units and 100 to 150 square feet for upper story units, depending cn the district. Increasing the open space requirements could be considered. Addltional area for open space amenities would also be provided. The result would be a proportional reduction of parking and building areas, theoretically resulting in reduced density. In practice, increased open space requirements would also encourage larger, higher and more massive buildings such as -stacked flats• versus townhouse style development or for more efficient use of land. C CITY COUNCIL ' STAF- PORT Multiple Family D& lopaent August 21, 1985 Page 8 Regarding private open space, patio and balcony sizes could be adjusted. It should be noted that current standards are generous, particularly for upstairs units. Building Separation /Setbacks The Optional Development Standards of the Development Code establishes no minimum building separation for multi- family projects. The Basic Standards require 15 feet separation for side to side buildings and 30 feet separation for buildings facing front to front. A minimum standard for building separation based on the height of the structure could be established for the Optional Development Standards. The Development Code allows only one -story multi - family units with 100 feet of the LN, L. and VL Districts. This provision only affects the interior boundaries of a project. '•s A standard could a set, however, which would also require one - story units along street frontages facing one -story single family development. Though not currently required by code, this approach Chas been used for several multiple 'amity projects approved by the Recreational Amenities Under the Optional Development Standards, a tot lot and open yard area, plus amenities such as a pool or tennis court are required. No specific requirements exist for the number of recreation facilities. A ratio could be establishM requiring a certain number of amenities based on the number of units within a project. Recreation facilities may include a pool, spa, tennis, volleyball, and handball courts, exercise room, recreation roam, tot lot, and open yard area 11th minimum dimensions. This would assure adequate recreation facilities within all multi - family projects and reduce the burden on City facilities and also affect the quality and types of projects built. Design Guidelines The Development Code includes guidelines for architecture of multi- family units. The dasign expectations for apartment structures, however, are generally less than for condominium or townhames. The most common type of apartment architecture is stacked flats (i.e. C one -level units placed over identical ground floor units). These are generally less appealing architecturally than townhouse -styla units (i.e. two -story units built side -to- side). Townhomes are normally associated with ownership units, though this is not always the case. 306' . �� n City COUICIL STAF' °PORT Multiple Family 0�_lopaent C August 21, 1986 Page 9 Design requirements could be established which discourage stacked flats unless designed to high quality standards with significant variation of roof height, form, and architectural planes. 4rrl Inq Development Code separates apartments and to.mhouse /condo parking requirements. The number of partying spaces for apartment units is marginally lower as shown on the chart below: CURRENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS SPACES PER UNIT artments TgwnhOuSea /Condo's Studio 1.3 1.3 1 Bedroom se 1.3 1.5 2 Bedroom 1.6 1.8 3 Bedroom 1.7 2.0 4 Bedroom 1.9 2.0 visitor 1.0 per 4 DU's 1.0 per 4 DU's The parking requirema:ts for apartments could be adjusted. If apartment standards were identical to that Of townhouses and condos, this would eliminate a site planning benefit for apartments, depending on the unit mix. Currently. One covered space in a garage or ca art 1s required for all multi - family projects. This Stan ar cou be changed to require garages for townhouses /condos and /or apartments. Building Code Provisions The Uniform Building Code has separate requirements for attached dwellings only if units are separated by actual oro ert lines. Attached units may be placed side by side (townhoxes ) or One a ove the other (stacked). To create individual ownership of units (versus apartments) attached units may be separated by property lines or air space*. Given the side by side configuration of townhomes, property lines carV be located between units. Units separated by property lines have stringent building code requirements for fire walls, and separate services, such as sewer, water, gas and upgraded electrical capacity. ......_ ti_..._ .. _ &0.2 ...._ C C L' CITY COUNCIL SW 'PORT Multiple Family 0 .lopment { August 21, 1985 Page 10 In the case of stacked units, property lines cannot separate different floors, so air space 1s used to divide ownership. The Uniform Building Code does not recognize air space in its requirements, therefore, the standards are identical whether or not units are sold inlividually as condos or rented as aparbaents. State legislation limits local amendments to the Building Code lac topography. Prior altoor adoption suOf amendments climate, og heogUniform research Code, uberanewsany a B tolildeterminorequirements, f itcan be additional accomplished. SUMMY: Of all the Development Standard revisions noted, the 70 —ow'ng appear to be the most feasible: 1. Consideration Of minimal dwelling unit size, by nurber of bedrooms. 2. alongt$treatf..mtages height 9 limits glOn multiple l ti pane story nausingt�. 3. Upgraded design requirements for -stacked flats-. C4. Modification in apartment parking requirements. CITY COIPICIL STAF °PORT Multiple Family O�.Opmeat C August 21, 1985 Page 11 ALTEANATIYE 0. REDUCTION OF OENSITT TMIOOG.y RECONSIDERATION OF N Reductions of density in specified areas is an alternative which would limit the ultimate bulldout level of multiple family development. Such reductions may also have an effect on the rate Of construction, through limited availability of appropriately designated land to specific areas. This section provides a description of Mitt- family residential Property in the Medium, Medium -Nigh, and High Residential Districts. The information is broken down into five planning areas fnr Alta Lou, Cucamonga, Etiwanda, Terra Vista and Victoria. The Caryn Planned Community is not included as it Contains no land designated for multi -family use. -he following tables outline the amount of vacant acreage by land use designation in each of the five areas. In addition, a second sat of numbers is provided to account for previous Planning Commission Opp roY�1 Of multi-family Projects; the number of acres _ in parentheses uvaaps indicate vacant or developable multiple family land not subject to prior final City approvals (i.e. Tract Maps, Development Approvals). The intent is to provide the Council with information on vacant land designated but not yet approved development. for multiple family Ca Ciry Cou•+cr- Sr.q--iPm- Multiple Family OL .lo;aent l_ August 21, 1985 Page 12 I IC w ` 1 _ L LL ' w �~ t s 1 rp . i , �.-I PC 1 ! "J-8 t. tl ?i 1 Wei 1 �I LU LM J1 t � a U L C .6pr 1 Y 171111-- L— Y�1I�'N'Y `C C\ \•''L.' r n�nJl_zA Y VL L LAia LFA LM* LYE + Fc L!L IC :I W K V.P.C. W— W ^'^ T.YI.G ass t1�s.4cv :)' Alta Loa& Planning Area APPROXIMATE VACANT AREAS OF F.ULTI- FAMILY ZONED LAND Vacant (Without Final City Approvals) Medium (8 -14 du /ac) 120 78 ) Medium -High (14 -24 du/ac) 60 40) High (24 -30 du /ac) 0 01 TOTFL ACRES It is important to note that a substantial portion of multi - family property in Alta Loma was considered for possible land use clangei Curing the 19th Street Corridor Study. As a result of the stedy, several sites along 19th Street were reduced to density. The table already reflects these reductions. - - '316 31 CITY CODICIL STAF 'PORT / Multiple Family Df.elopnent August 21, 1985 Page 13 it ` r rc i �..!- LM L ! a - ; "� 1 1 ppuu. 9 - �t.'ny' t ::;� �. �ae� Via.. •u�.: K cc U GC jG4 MH cc cc `� y oai u• ■■ •. •• .. 4 a a f • ••uuun• _ M LM: _ ► u `: _ x.._ .. IL _a I �I _ •ua.muuu.i _ . LS.P Wuan�aa Plannfna Area APFROXIMATE VACANT ACRES OF MULTI - FAMILY ZONED LAND Vacant (Without Final City Approvals) Medium (8 -14 du /ac) 17? 123 Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac) 75 58 High (24 -30 du /ac) 0 TOTAL ACRES A C CITY COU9CIL STAFr 'PORT / Multiple Family 0 - lop,,ent l August 21, 1985 B.-- u Etiranda Planning Urea: APPROXIMATE VACANT ACRES OF MULTI - FAMILY ZONED LAND M Vacant (Without Final City Approvals) Medium (8 -14 du /ac) 143 125 Medium -High (14.24 du /ac) 0 01 - High (25 -30 du /ac) 0 0 TOTAL ACRES143 (125) The highest densityy ppermitted'•in the Ett►tnda Specific Plan is Medium Residential t8 -14 du /ac). CM COUNCIL STAFP -PORT Multiple Family Ot.-lopmenc August 21, 1985 Page 15 PE _t 71 Terra Vista Planning Area APPROXIMATE VACANT ACRES OF MULTI- FAMILY ZONED LAUD Vacant (Without Final City Approvals) M,edim 4 -14 du /ac) 224 116 Medium-High (14 -24 du /ac) 65 65 High (24 -30 du /ac) 71 71 TOTAL ACRES360 (252) In Terra Vista, the Medium Residential category has a range of 4 to 14 units per acre versus 8 to 14. With the lower range, a significant portion of Medium Res I.Intial property has been approvad and /or constructed as single family homes. However, the overall buildout within the Planned Community remains the same by building at the higher end of the range within multi - family projects. _ 313 _..._ 3 � 1 C i r 7 A CITY COUVCIL STAFr 'PORT Multiole Family 01helopment August 21, 1985 Page 16 .t- ) - Bu ■ C L Victoria Planning Area • `�„ APPROXIMATE VACANT ACRES OF MULTI - FAMILY ZONED LAND Vacant (With3ut Final City Approvals) Medium (4 -14 du /ac) 251 251) Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac) 125 125 High (24 -10 du /ac) 52 52 TOTAL ACRES428 (428) Development in the Victoria Planned Ccomunity has occurred in the Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) and Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) categories. As of tLis date, no multi - family projects have rer ived approval. • Includes approximately 73 acres not within Planned Community Boundaries CITY COUICIL STAFr 'PORT Hultip'e Family ojN,,jOpnpnt August 21, 1986 Page 17 The preceding information focuses on multiple family designated land not yet canned to development through tentative map or similar approvals. It should be noted that in the planned Community areas, i.e. Terra Vista and Victoria, the City has made previous commitments relative to ultimate level of development through binding agreements. The City's ability to modify previously restricted.anHowever,ist ffecouldPlanned re-examine sexi existing Mists. and1H land use designations in the Alta Tema, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda areas if so directed by the City Council. IV. St) IMY OF AVAiLABILE ALTERNATIVES: Each of the alternatives outlined In t s report responds to a slightly different set of problems and may be used individually or in conjunction with other solutions. Though by no means complete, the summary below is intended to provide a format for discussion. Host of other options can of course be added if desired. The options for cans deraticn Include the following: irss A. Formalize City policy on multiple family financing through: 1. Elimination of future multiple family bonds; or 2. Limitation of such bonds to specified circumstances; or B. Consider a new growth management policy which may affect in some way all residential development; or C. Consider modification to existing development standards, with possible focus on minimum dwelling sizes, parking and other provisions; or D. Consider modifications to the Land Use Element of the General Plan in specified planning areas or City -wide. Y. Otto Krou Senior P n OK:jr Attachments It is recdmcerJed that the Council review the ted to this report and provide staff with C ✓, 'T7 OF RANCHO CUCA610NG.• � 'AUVIrr DEVELOPMENT DEP1 C JUL 2 G 1°85 716191101U1121112IM15P6 N,wtcw *hc cNK et"tN Cifttc Y N[t lMINtNU # IOYNIN fLOON 1NOwM v ucriNt111 w.0. [ON IO fw N,L1N O N.NsON ttt[t•IOtt O Cup 104 INN 00.01 0. N•w.Nw lO ObtltN 1ntf.eN[ W tl.• 1w MEMORANDDY TO: Jack Lam. Community Development Director, City of Rancho Cucamonga FRO4t James L. Markman, City Attorney DATED: July 25, 1985 RE, Criteria for imposition of growth management control on housing in Rancho Cucamonga • _ This memorWdum is in response to the Council's request for input on the possibility of controlling apartment build -outs as compared to singlo family build -outs through a growth management ordinance. As a beginning point, the rather sparse statutory authority for a growth management 3rdinance is atatad in California Government Code Section 65863.6, a copy of which is attached to this memorandum. The section states that any ordinance limiting the number of housing units which may be constructed annually must contain fird- ings as to the public health, safety and welfare items which are promoted by the adoption of such an ordinance which in turn justifies reducing housing opportunities in the region in question. One clear example of such an ordinance which has been adopted is found in Pacifica Co ration v. Cit of Camarillo (1983), 109 Cal. Ap p. attaching a Lam attah iuSi copy of that case for your cunsidera am The case really turns on procedural questions raised by a particular developer who was denied a housing allotment during calendar year 1982. The pertinence of the case to this memorandum is the fact that it describes one of the most comprehensive growth management ordinances in the state and validates the criteria for adapting the ordinance and the different criteria to be considered by the city council within the ordinance in making housing allotments. units for ructed in any ne calendarayearlin the Camarillo case was stated as a recital in the Growth Con- trol-L-a—w—an-cris found in Footnote 2 on page 172 of the case. C 316 31 Memorandum to Jack Lam July 25, 1985 Page 2 The rather crucial recital in question states as followse achieve taisteady, rather fthan aefluctuating,coverly rapid, rate of residential growth each year in order that the services provided by city, school, park, utility and /or service agencies operating in the city can be properly and effectively staged in a manner which will not overextend existing facilities, and in order that deficient services may be brought up to required and necessary standards while mini- mizing, by means of long -range planning, the avoid- able costs of short - sighted facility expansion." • Governme If you taa -Winto consideration to provisions of Tss nt Code Section 65863.6 and the above- quoted recital in the Camarillo ordinance, it becomes clear that a growth management ordinance must be founded upon a need to make housing allocations so as not to overtax public services and Public infrastructure facilities such as streets, water lines and sower lines. Accordingly, it is my view that in consider - order ht hbalancepapartmentabuild -cuts with singleufaammilya in dwelling build -outs, there must be a factual basis for doing so founded upon an inability to meet Public service or facility needs through normal development processes. Inci- dently, in that regard, we have found no authority for a growth management ordinance which does noting more than create a balance between apartment build -outs and single family dwelling build -outs. There must be an over -all public infrastructure and /or public service need justifying the growth management control ordinance as a whole. If a situation exists in Rancho Cucamonga Justify- ing a growth management ordinance on the above - stated basis, the Camarillo case again becomes useful as a source estab- lish nq3 —tic specific criteria by which one developer's pro- posal is balanced against another's to receive housing allot - monts in a given year. Those criteria include the capacity of the water system to serve the particular development pro- posed, the capacity of the schools to absorb any increase in children generated by that development, to impact of the Particular development on to sewer system, to fire department, If c � Meooranium to Jack Lim July 25, 3985 Page 3 the street system and any arterial highwry systxs and rtorm drainage considerations. of course, those criteris anilyra rntential negative impacts of a develommt. Ocher criteria to be taken into consideration in a core positive vein include the harmony of the proposed architectural design of a proposal d— .vloeaant with neighboring development, the provision or extension of bike trails, equestrian trails and green belts and virtually all other aesthetic and compatibility fxtures. Mast importantly, for the purposes of this rarorandum, the Oamarillo case also establishes the fact that the type of residential un tip consideration in each development proposal any be considered. I believe that if he reach that point in implementing a growth canagsment ordinanca, the City Conahcil could take into consideration in allot ildable housing units tow type of units to be built; that is, whatMr those units constitute single family dwellings x apartments. The analysis in question as to each development �roosal could take into consideration as one of n rous C factors receiving m=artcal allocations, the different types of housing reels -- istin3 In the community sd those which arc being met to a greatar degre3 than othhers. Thus, if theta is a need for single family dwellings for parsam working in and about the community and eh 3 region to a greater degres than apartment habits which may be ahead in the build -out phase, It is possible that the Oxauil could decide to allow points to single family dwellings in its consideration of all relevant factors Again, I mast rauticn that in order to reach that point in icplemsnttl7 a growth nanagament ordinance, it is first necessary that the Council mare a broad polity decision that such an ordinance which in effect limits the number of build-outs Acing a year by governmental action is nscsasazy to be sure chit infrastructure and public service naeis my Se mat It say well be Cut the Council will decide that through other legal devices available, Rancho Cucamonga already is able to meet pW31ic service and infrastructure :eels generated by tossup build-outs. I hoes that this mmorsnluum ani the attacvsh authorities tra .useful to you in p: ovt.iinp oaken, fx ar_ion by the City Council on this subje•:t 4nttsr. hi,'41s j'< `hf.1. _ 318 - 37 STAFF TELEPHONE SURVEY, August 15, 1985 CITY - ._ MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZES CHINO No Standards , Possible new standards now being considered. IRVINE No Standards - Just use UBC FONTANA Dwelling Unit Size Based on Zoning as Follows: RR -I Minimum Lot Size 1,200 sq. ft. - al! R1 Zones A11 Single Family Units R -1 -C 1,I00 sq. ft. R -1 -D 1,200 sq. ft. R -1 -E 1,300 sq. ft. R -1 -F 1,400 sq. ft. R_2-,4PJ50 sq. ft. if single family detached 650 sq. ft. if multi - family R_3 850 sq. ft, if single family detached 500 sq. ft. if multi - family MONTCLAIR* Minimum Size Based on Dwelling Unit Type as Follows: (a) Single Family Detached Units: S2 bdrms - 1,300 sq.' ft. 3 bdrms or more - 1,400 sq. ft. (b) Multi -Family Units (Apt. b Condo) 1 bdrm 950 sq. ft. 2 bdrms 1,200 sq. ft. 3 bdrms 1,400 sq. ft. 4 bdrms 1,450 sq. ft. + Minimum Room Size of 110 sq. ft. • All dwelling units require 2-car garage, no csrports ONTARIO No Standards �y c C C C UPLANO ZONE Single Family Zones R -S -15 R -S -10 R -S -7.5 R -S -6 Multi - Family Zones R -M-4.4 R- M- 3.6(c) R -M -3.6 R -M -2.0 R -M -1.5 5 ecial Tur- C Dwelling Unit Size Standards as Follows: MIN. LOT AREA sq. t. MIN. 0/U SIZE sq. t. 20,000 2,000 15,000 1,800 10,000 1,600 7,500 1,400 6,000 900 30,000 30,000 15,000 16,000 7,500 �d 1,000 /du 1,000 /du 1,000 /du 1,000 /du 500 - Bachelor 700 - 1 Bdrm 800 2 Bdrm 1,000 - 3 Bdrm 1.000 sq. ft. for a 1 Bedroom plus 200 sq. ft. for additional Bedroom ;v- City C "ecct Fluty Aw(w" a. 191i Feat 7 MOWNS each y $olmto amended by tied to •Firm* be$l.ttn tr.. es -117. C1 -111. od 65-111. Matins carried raectwsly 7 -0. .� we flow mbaltmd 1` rot- k0rnnsm n .,moo. oes. to R. tin RLf1r" f fTln .mft!f AA. - Review (:71 of smile, aleerratbco evttlawle to antral tea taco. vasis a" nrliy of out title flay devaepoem to the City. staff report by Otte troutil. Suter flare[. (0201 -01 OTVROP Cars) Meyer Man yeusd the setting fn "bit@ islet. Adorct,ied Council worst verb Caw upouaad that is felt the coat of Luau to Tun riots was pin Litt considering the ,tart of toad that you would be lotting. M would like to ec. wa lead alit it* bases. virus Stara. Victoria recldast. a"n"d la,mc for intrusted the total .pare fntaso of aedt• (rally ►seas to 1100 span feet. on stated that thqr} basing Prowl. with Call VLebtime wltbL@ Victoria. M. we n that Uluruted the silo of cue baau. -24 haNfv117 the trice of two horn, would blip Israel ease of the Prwdasu. Oous Rad,rn. Vittoria runuto n"a,pd concern sweet powdtem each as decline of dnas. Powder at Violations of City Cad., and CCtsa. tractor trailers no& pool [rail na is driamyo, cm which era set operetta I. the drims "Is lue- temtsaed amattm all 1a the park develaposet where the tame are null, tau at tbn thing@ Ism \"load to the Country, or the Card.... at fall that If them are to be colt tires then he ssth. tsd that the CC1ta be carried. Wua 7y. Victoria resident. opmu,d that if the square ["rate of ch. horn arm increased. it wield to • tang our I. investing am uIsrael., trsNTt7 Vats., aid detecting no factom which are "�artn, to the Victors• comicality. Say Retinae. L.wil bra. arlruad that .Vermont..... urged is the cow maiy. Calais Ladam. Victoria resident. mmud .sum beat en cmditivae is Victoria. Teter scar. Victoria resident. uatd rely vein k "ied that the rise meld be 1s.uuadg the trice woad to "v and tb quality would tacre.u. It two ""11 In* a wisher stela to the Pm"ry. tens they Will sib hot. tor pre of It, They aura aawleS Council far hig%" ecsad,rds. Jett Co"istt. Oan Corporation. emerged that the People contact the ti- it e coop," sad find our whr two leader is red eerily tear Positions V.s case lot attarceamt Iran the trader. lbtpb Lear trod Council cut to sate standards a high that people ca - live to the City. Re. Na/dam ettt*A that tee OCAn udd to be Iofrrtrg, tad felt twit it. 1100 ensure f "t $build be eaomat far a rat. lady. 3a/ t a� City Couch Fl.aeae August 21. 11ec p4. b Jar$ )test, Lt/oeda modest, arpranN that vhw the C'aerA plus sus ant -so It sea lard that the @Yates WSold !lest Co its own level. Tkp ['ng"Ltad that MItPlndly mold hate as lseruea In the Sanatbpar , short Poll" Of tiro bit alas acmwledpd that It vm:d pek sot. The fpnLt/c Muse ."Id licit the sash, at Aol11ngS. Lea lasesaso Las Sources Unrest. developers of the Cln Waves project at Lase and Urea, Stated that less !has e" wt at the sw bwpi4 .,Im "at the put ems yearn hno ben rltt- fadlyt eke snti"ol "Gras* to clever to PO penest. 4 Sr"rngd CaawAl 't to war rust to e ceero"ts IlsmnLas In makers W ,carrier nwsahet is eke. ability to rat the "Viet daea*ds. Jack Sylvester steed that Wutrial developers Want the labor support Is the ens beta,. tip Will build is a atu. In ...",&,ad C..ecll Out t. 'it, ho What took at, up years n d , P. !twos ford. Wit lluS q" Ca,o a'atd Ibat they sets C"sCarnd "best the too -tea quality of lit. is flat "U. They do ma hat that esd[eating olntws site balling nip addresses the ec " &, but that the CLty'e C"ar- LL pin t[evid"r t" • a'"@ 'active St atfw-4414 keeping. The Lost Try tee motley t "trot to through the City-S esl,,i4 rmlw nd &rprevd pm- nu. to tart" mproued that ym an aiding Wit\ '"Sella growth a" \w to hndte lt. as talc that ym meant 1 111." •slue'. Shut C"trAb shat bat".' It n area to *&That tress. In ta'be Cat-Mad, m hen ecti,&ly tar k4ber Culip at Ills postal" h me" project, Kernel tr.l w0mber of Sort,*" nd the "wepties. Stet tee specaauu 'i the tend, Has of a hour dues not lngbl,m quality w' lit". Jabs Wasnarlsa Colt Council awls salamin the @mm, pa, Jatt Stature asked Co sell ant to abe"" the Central Res. Thera being we tart'" Public rupmes, ll@Yar With Clesd the Wit, Luring. aatee Agar Made Called • Tweae IT 10,51 p,& The ratL4 r'ameess at 11,10 � : hh all Pesters of the COST process. Cwttilra KIM felt W. were it • Make[ teat in the Mlti -fndly davolerMnt, and ttgedd to the irst.e at fell",, I' 1lolta- /tally cvestrrti" hndU be had 11 emblaze is helping dmalaper gat tlsa riaC in eclat that as eight I", nastily dmdoprars Is the affordable ea&". b. Controls at the f,to of grwn/g,wlb eass,'"Itt sat urn t ma Saba the arreseary tWings to bring that type Of olecrn.a LWa to Intel ". ea Controls os dGwImPo Ct nrmgb snrdoi decibel be did at cut there Wu a gnat fled of the sutler Mite tats the seat and be sect s@Y of eddnuieS the s "eons "proceed by the Victoria "aidean is abreast volt cab. d. 44acti" Of density, did at feel it was appropriate. CveecLIMS Debt stated, a. lblti- tttlly C"piructi" b. b Would like to eat Crust Ll take a task at pr"j'ec ad rata sore an too Mtti- frilly handled that we to very aal'tivs is as term*. as W"old like is ea. the Mitt -tally &safes stopped for evblle ad out Were say Mee mitt- !,SLIT Press. Fwoar. 3 CAD City Council NIAets. Ayari 11. lest Pots p wbn It eat@ to the "rttnge ?"lint boadt aN the Get" ►toes, be felt we said de everything pt.. thin to I'd "a those. b. Control* as the at* of gswtWgtwt► uaytratt lip at !cal elan was any .q ibis could he 4", la . f... able .q. a. Cntrsts a0 d" lepaeR th?ongb upgraded daatpt nW nu site build he 144eSw*sda b fait this Owld he referred to Sts floating Ce"ts*tas fer a TaCO"l@datln Sad bring ►ant to the Cattail. W .w14 like to @l@ all *parr "w Is the City Cnstraeted to ssad"Ld" specifications. 4. Werth is gravity, felt Shia @kwld be don n • lita-y -alts 4- aia. There @bletd oat be a reductlea "lees we see as Lapaetlea. Car Ces- oral fin addwarle the hither density "Its pretty wall. Ia S "Wted that .e look at the •tondaeds of develapsSwt. lad Tall@ the Standard, f" sstrt "nos. Y felt that "Alin @Laos de equate to battle paltry. Cou.clln." OrLglt anted os lellwar e. IYlt4daally en "r "tin bsMn be W40 to the alial "t/ee of the naeativel far aoltl- flail) belle, bet npplutel band ll "aches for teal" ettlseno. b. Cenral, as the sets of g?wthfaewth "eagh"stt fait this war Close @lace the City Attor.ey advised yei"t this. t. C@Mtrple as d "@larwst newt► .pgrads. dt*last little final, advise% suit Sale - rya Is fares of Setting a Wks" at 1100 square feet. Cpl@ Swregairwet - fait this war swiyast Swings. tslid{ng set ►Fie - Me story units along strut trustees shield be a part of our a "u/re- rats. Apartwan noun eastern to tuogoedales @CUCdCN@. Portly to- delftware - felt that n build be r "*act" Cleared parking is all ..are. d. Wearies to density, teat the Pala" emaintains could not ?hangs b "eel@ Of the developer ngnmo.Ta, het thane lens Other ucsge at high des- city wbacb the felt should be seduced according to the reeawsdatlea@ by the Adwi.." Caaalosl ". Caaxtlle_ t "can Stated that be felt that council should sat tote" n*ctswq. 4pectatin* Amid be realistic, bee un blue to Carl with the basic@ with a loaleat, claws uses to panning, no blue developed the Coastal nn. all it la inwart"t that o fettle though as a 8604, ?ewe euea plus .Ith a logical approach tat a balanced eoawelty err future years. taerwa@r title het@ ►le. made, bet he felt Cattail Cbwld ins as, ne felt that Coastal don blue • beadle as the Wastioa. Mon Matel, t.t*d its% to did net test a needed Say aedlficaetaa. to the 1W use almost of the Cwr+t now at thin petit. rrohtan aq crop up, but .e el@ look at than at that rim. De blue the highest dlubep "St standards of sty city 1s the Cae.w of gas psrnrdles a4 blue a great Crests, Na..Immt It's. its paait." Ta with- feslly bend financing uos ban clear. WM(al, Mined by King, setoad*& by t"aat test Council take as actin and cwn fared n ether bacteria. Metier Carried s fellow" ATVs, target. Mltals, tin YOU, Delgbt, Debt )A. (0100-00 AD- MlpstTtgsla) 3C*-;'1Z3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��x STAFF REPORT �� C U S DATE: April 16, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroutll, Senior Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COM.'NNiTY OEVELOPMENTiiBLOCK GRANT APPLICATION NS CAL YEAR I, BACKGROUND: At the March 20, 1986 meeting, the City Council 1986�amunityiDevelopment Block Grant Program. eCTheegrant for FY 1986 -87 is expected,So be 5340,000. Six projects were proposed for resolution on al establishing the10follloowing prioritiescifor d project ect ti funding: PROJECT /PROGRAM PROPOSED COST 1. Housing Rehabilitation S 80,000 2, Turner Avenue Widening $225,000 3. SW Cucamonga Street Improvements S29S,0000 4, Arrow Route Improvements S 6,000 5. Senior Shared Housing 6. Southwest Cucamonga Park Acquisif'on $300.000 A total amount of $62,000 (18% of the expected total grant) was allocated Administration account.�This includesrthemfollowing entatlon and a. Future Projects S 7 +000 b. Program Administration 20,720 c. Program Management 19,780 d, Fair Housing Services 7.500 e. Contingency 7,000 Total $62,000 The requested funding for the Turner Avenue Widening Project (5225,000) includes a contingency fund of $56,250. If Turner Avenue funding is reduced by $27,000 to 5198,000, total expected funding for FY 86/87 ($340,0001 would be enough to cover the costs of the first two projects on the priority list (Housing Implementation/ Administration. Turner Avenue Widening) together with Program ,3a� CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG Application Fiscal Year 1986 -87 Final Statement of Community Objectives April 16, 1986 Page 2 According to Community Development Block Grant regulations, adoption of a Final Statement is now required. The Final Statement of Community Objectives contains the application to HUD for funding for the 1986 -87 projects and administration costs. At this time, the Council will review the Final Statement of Community Objectives and determine whether the proposed projects and funding levels described in the document are appropriate prior to submission to HUD. If so, the Council is required to approve the Final Statement of Community Objectives and direct staff to submit the Final Statement and application for Block Grant funds to HUD. II. RECOMENDATIONS In view of the limited amount of grant funds ava a e -ror- FY 1986 -87, and past Council direction, staff recommends the Council take the following actions: A. Select for fundi'41ithe following projects and funde7 out of the City's Community DevelopmentroBlock Grant award: Project/Promram Amount I. Housing Rehabilitation S 80,000 2. Turner Avenue Widening $198,000 3. Local Costs /Program Implementation a. Future Projvzts S 7,000 b. Contracts and Administration S :0,720 C. Programs Management S 19,780 d. Fair Housing Services S 7,500 e. Contingency S 7.000 Total Funding $340,000 B. Approve the Final Statement of Community Objectives. C. Authorize Mayor to .' -n the application for Community �pevelopment Block Grant funds included in the Final Statement of Commmjmi).fty Objectives. If C 1.1 concurs, adoption of the attached resolution would be a 1b mate. Otto K Senior Attachments: Final Statement of Community Objectives Resolution of Approval 3aS RESOLUTION NO. X4-- tb-Qlit gto — % 16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMDAINiTY OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMM191ITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1906/87. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regulations governing the Cenmunity Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, notice of the availability of funds for eligible projects community published in the Daily Report and mailed to Interested comnity groups; and WHEREAS, the City Staff has received proposals for projects and programs from various organizations In the Community; and WHEREAS, the City Staff has conducted a needs assessment to determine.! program eligibility and ne and '+z WHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing in order to give the public an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations for program funding and to put forth for Council consideration recommendations for their own; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard public testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Block Grant Program for the next program year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions: A. Approve the Final Statement of Community Ot,ectives. C. Select for funding the following projects and programs to be funded out of the City's Community Development Block Grant award: Protect/ Program Amount 1. Mousing Rehabilitation f 80,000 2. Turner Avenue Widening $198.000 3. Local Costs /Program Implementation a. Future Projects $ 1,000 b. Program Administration S 20,720 e. Progrdms Management $ 19,180 d. Fair Mousing Services $ 7,500 e. Contingency $ 7.000 Total Funding $340,000 3a(o .d Resolution No. PO4- 16 -01R COBG Application Fiscal Year 1986 -87 Final Statement of Community Objectives Page 2 C. Authorize Mayor to sign the application for Community Development Block Grant funds included in the Final Statement of Community Objectives. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King, Mayor ATTEST: 1r, 2rz Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A AUTNELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution rus duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council field on the * day of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk 30�7 _1■ C[TP OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATES April 16, 1996 T0: City Council and City Manager numl Mark R. Lorimar, Adainiecrative Analyst %•�^ -A'��' SDBJICT3 VECTOR CONTR OL PROGRAM ALTM01ATIV99 <W Back in September. 1985, the City Couocil entered into an agreement with Mr. Cone Zduoovski, a certified Vector Control professional, for purposes of studying the existing fly problems in Rancho Cucamonga. mod identifying alternative vector control programs available to the City. Mr. Zdunowski submitted his initial fly density report to the City Council on December 186 1985, establishing that the primary contributors to the :ly problem are divided equally between residential areas and commercial poultry rancho. Spec'.fica1156 in the survey of residential and business premises. the majority of the sources attracting flies were garbage and other refuge in origin. grass clippings. small and large backyard animal votes and compost piles. Vhilo an average of 36Z of the residential coamnity is producing a minimum of 5OZ of the fly population, the commercial poultry reach operations are producing 33 - 5OZ of the fly population. It was noted that in order for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to have unobjectionable fly populations, it world be necessary for all segments of the community to contribute to fly control. The report stressed that such an objective could be accomplished through the ure of a full -Lim Vector Control Biologist responsible for education, survailsore, compliance and control of the City's vector concerns. M Vector Control Program Alternatives April 1F 1986 Page 2 The find phase of Mr. Unnwsti's consulting services is to identify alternative vector control programs available to the City. At this point. it appears as if the City has five options available in addressing the vector control situation. These options are as fullness 1. City to support a self - contained program for vector control using =satin& personnel, including Administrative staff and Community Code Popresentatives. Although any additional coat to provide appropriate vector control services would be minimal, minting City staff is not qualified to implesent a professional program, and increasing staff efforts toward vector control activities would decrease staff of -forts on other important community code activities. 2. City to initiate may action regarding vector control. This option would not aidrees any concerns for vector control problems which have surfaced in recent years. 1. City to enter Late an agreement with the Bnvironmental Health Serv!ces Department of Sao Bernardino County to provide vector control services. This option should be considered in that contract services provided by a reputable agency appears to be the most beneficial and efficient notbod of providing adequate vector control services. 4. City to enter into an agreement with the Neat Valley Veer" Control District to provide appropriate vector control services. This option should be considered in that contracting with a reputable agency for vector control services api�ars to be the mast beneficial and efficient method of providing appropriate vector control services. S. City to support self - contained program for vector control using in- reseed staff, including the hiring of a Vector Control Specialist. This option would not be the most beneficial, in that acquiring appropriate equipment and a vehicle would prove far more costly than contracting for the •arvites. Prom the five options listed, it in clear that those two associated with contracting out for vector control services would be preferred. An analysis of the two proposals from the West Valley Vector Control District and the County of San Bernardino follows. Bag Vector Control Progru Alternatives April 16. 1986 Page 3 i .anv er*riC OOy POE 9EEgICE ` _ ' SLAL1 $33.212.00 $36.120.00 330 The the services proposed by both es as il aslthenPersonnelttonbe annual g BY ■�AID110 C0071 VEST VALLEY Services I. x12 Ceetrol I. Plr Control ' PzGE�tdt ♦ Respond to citizen * Easpond to citizen complaints. complaints. • Isspaet Poultry ranch. • Inspect poultry taoeb. • Inspect residential sad • inspect residential and equestrian areas, equestrian areas. • Implement code ComPli- • Implement code compli- ance ■ctivitw one* activities. • Citizen education. * Citizeo education. • Monitor fly population ° Monitor fly population densities. densities. • Release 3 million • Release 3 million Cbalcids for biological cbalcids for biological control of fly larvae control of fly larvae and pupae it selected and pupae in selected areas. areas. • Apply residential pesti- cides on an emergency basis to control fly outbreaks. 2. Zia ee1[e Cee[rol 2. M gplto Central 3• U Ceetrol 6 All Qtbtr Pte ! Parsceart Provide one fall -time Provide one full -time Emircamental Specialist a •a .•ets Vector Control Biologist and all necessary and all necessary equipment. equipment. SLAL1 $33.212.00 $36.120.00 330 Vector Control Program, Alteratives April 16, 1SS6 Page 4 BEGI QUIDJ,= it is recommended that the City Council choose between the San Bernardino County Bnvirowmental Services or the Vest Valley Control District in contracting for vector control services. Attached for your ref stance is • copy of the final analysis subdtted by Mr. Zdauwati along with a copy of tAe fly density report submitted last December. MBL /dja Attached qd 3 3/ 2s -b,4 lr- mace w.._ Gene Zdunowski 4 s.41s,:.� Vector Control Consultant 1615 W Fern • Redlands. CA 92771 • (Tiq 825761 City ofRahcii Cucamonga March 6.1906 Mark Lorimer. AdnlnlstrativeAnatyst 9320 8asellne Rd Rancho Cuxmonge. CA 91730 Dear Mark- As previously discussed, one of my administrative tesks was to solicit from the County of San Bcrnardiro and the West valley Vector Control District weir respatsao to the following Q)mttons bared on the City of R,xxld Cucamonges Fly Density Survey 1 what Is the veary cost to the City for a sowlalized Vector Control Program to inclum a Vector Biologist, the administrative overhead =Is. the cuts of Private vehicle use, and the cost of government vehicle use? 2 Whet Is the eapabilly at each egerrcy to address the needs erg eonclusiom of the Fly Y DemltvSurvey? `�. J 3. What we the methods that each agency will use to add the results and conclusions of the Fly Dms:y Survey? In order to adgatay adYass the efaromontlahad queatlahs, I felt that eery an In the praoss of ascertaining Vector Control costs to the City It would be intw%tirhg to first get an estimate from aeon agency on the cuts of question + I mentioned above. This would give a baseline for bete that would be submitted by these agencies after they had reviewed and responded to the results noted In the City's Fly density survey. These lnitlet resporuesare atti cad Attached you will find the formal and most recent repite3 by the West Valley Vector Control District, and that of the S B. County Dept. of Environmental Health Services to the qumtlam stated above. Each agency basically replied to the major querles as follows PROGRAM COSTS Q+t West Yellnry YCD protected a total cast of $36,720 per year, and they absertad to admimtrattve warhead figure submitted in their first estimate. 6 County DENS prOteceda total cast of 231,712 per year, end they adsorbed to admlmtretive overhand figure submitted In their first estimate. They suggest anotW possible funding source. CAPABILITY "2 West Yeiley YCD has the experfenca of management and entomological atdr to eddraa a Ca K*10mhre fly control program. The proposal does not state If a qualified Vector Control SPeclallst Is currently on staff, but the sorvlces of all other staff will be evadable on an as neadlO basis The District has recently alled IN mclndl as its scoots motor Program. 33=) CAPABILITY Qs2 (CONT.) March 6,1986 S 6 CwletY DENS has the crprlence a( a senior vector biologist and a Led vector control specialist staff to emresa a comprelwutva fly control program. Th proposal zates that onaEnvironmenW Knuth Srvfaeprsanryrr for VeCldr control duties wlthln the city. Proposal also suggests other vector control service and profasknel back up stall. METIIO03 063 Waal Valley VCD suggests survelllrx, education, complfarre, ad control. Surveillance includes establishing fly traps, monitoring dagree -deys. Schad lad poultry ranch nnspeetrdns, ad u- TKIIon of backyard farm animals on a complaint bests. Edicataun anciudes indivigwl and group Instruction, school presentstiom, and mama mfrmalion CanPtaaoa through the Issuance d notices as necessary. Control hiyo1Vaa the release of five million fry prasales, emrgM residual pesticide applications, and residual pesticides sprayed In commercial aumpstrs June through Sept 5 B Csu :ty DENS Vi9pata black by block tagetlog (survelllarce an e micro stele), pub] lclnfrmatloNedcstlon, rQglL�t9l 9ealns pecti=, volunteer use, and enforcanenl Block trpting 0=3ts of sway, W Ata:k: control phase, and the maintenance phase, Public Information include brochures , ono en one public training, "Wing campeiq»,prose releases, and group presentation& Routine Inspactlors Include poultry ranches and stables. DENS unties volunLrs for M con"I elxd!on and surveys. Enforcament skills we sLledand Involvement W Its use Is suggested to evolve from community reds Thee refponncos reed to be edtessed try City staff prior to a final. econ maidelltn by myself as your Vector Control Consultant. Consideration should be given to W goals and Nrec!ann which the City has already uJartaken ail which the Management and Council would Ilse to uncrlake. Please feel free to Cell me should yes have any qu stuns regrdin g ftm proposals or my report on their response, 97 ft"ZUVN*l. P& 333 VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES PROPOSAL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROYMLHTAL HEALTH SERVICES FISCAL YW.R 1966 -87 Proposal Introduction Urban vector control has been proven effective In certain target areas within San Bernardino COUnty Previocsly, funding for special County vector contro pro) - nas been provided by Community Developoent Block ,;rant tunds Several cities within the County have periodically uti zee B1ocK Grant funding to subsidize t'ioir vector control programs. Vector complaints are increasing in the City, indicating an increasing vector infestation rate as well as encroachment Into agricultural areas. The City of Rancho Cucamonga may desire to initiate a vector control program to help deal wi tj these problems. A possible funding source of this program s, among others designated Federal Community Block Grants. Proposal Related Experience The Department of Environmental Health Services has operated a successful vector control program in the Cities of Ontario, Colton and Yucaipa as well as County areas. The Ontario program was a federally funded three -year experiment in which a target area of 193 city blocks was systematically eradicated of rats while careful study was carried out on methods and effectiveness. The experience and knowledge gained by the Department of Environ- mental Health Services will be used to implement this proposal. I. PROJECT PROPOSAL Rancho Cucamonga Proposal - 1986 -87 It Is proposed that a special project which would assign one Environmental Health Services person /yoar to vector control duties within the City of Rancho Cucamonga be implemented. This workload level would be reassessed at the end of one year. The total labor cost of tho project would be approximately $27,712. Alternative staffing levels would affect the total cost of the project and is negotiable to fit the needs of the City. The following is a proposal description of the project and proposed project budget. Rat Control and Eneitancental Improvement Project Effective vector control on an area -wide basis has only been 33 y achieved when local agencies follow pcoceducca established to reduce factors contributing to the support of o vector population in a city in conjunction with affective vector source reduction. Since vectors ate presumed to have access to all properties on a city block, for the purposes of this project, the unit of area measurement is the City block. This area Is sometimes referred to as the target area. This program consists of three distinct phases. Initially a survey is taken to determine the extent of the infestation and identify target areas so that results can be measured. Next, the attack phase of the project is Initiated wherein vectors are controlled by selective source reduction techniques. These techniques usually involve improvements on properties to reduce the carrying capacity of the vector population to a level below which it is possible for vectors to survive an the area. This is also accomplished by a citizen education program.. Finally, a maintenance phase is initiated in which vector target areas are protected from re- invasion while the overal! vector target area Is expanded. 115p, T -v The various facets of a community vector control and environ- mental Improvement program Include vector source ceductionl public education on the importance of rat- proofing buildings, maintenance of yards and landscape plants, refuse and garbage handling, removal of junk automobiles and epplicances as well as other necessary local improvements and code enforcement of commercial animal operations. Many of the above facets are within the jurisdiction of various City departments for ultimate enforcement. When nuch is the case, this project serves to coordinate the effort in a systematic way on a block by block basis, with the Department of Environmental Health Services as the lead enforcement agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga providing backup Code enforcement. Success of a project depends on habitat manipulation which must be performed by the property owner. Such success is also dependent on public awareness education effects and code enforcement. 335- II. PROPOSED PROGRAM BODG&T I. Annual salary and benefits, Vector Control, Range "C" (Salary: $25,119) Benafiten 95,163) I1. Environmental Specialist III - Professional biologist services Annual administrative overhead costs, (Office space provided by city) (Oased upon a formula which considers Percentages of total complaints; permits; and other fiscal, personnel, and management support activities). III. Monthly cost to operate a vehicle. IV. Pest control supplies. MB:gd 77 3 3� 92 -7,712 /yr. n/c n/c 9250/mo. 91,000 . 1 B ', BASTING COUNTYWIDE INSECT AND RODENT VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES I. Introduction Problem Statement The San Bernardino County, Department of Environmental Health Services, has been and continues to be in the forefront of public health significdnt vector control services throughout the County. The diversity of miccaclimates found in San Bernardino County are Likely to contain more disease vector species than in any other County in the State. Past diseases which involve insects are found in tropic or subtrop a areas; however, that are several important diseases associated with arthropods which occur in temperate cegions. Surveys and human case histories show that malaria, encephalitfs,,.j+lague, and relapsing fever ace the Tj principal arthropod- born�i diseases occuccing In San Bernardino County. Constant monitoring and control efforts by the Department of Environmental Health Services must be maintained to prevent the spcoad of these diseases to the populace. Complaint Response System Each year vector personnel handle approximately 40% (2,500 -3,000 yearly) of the Environmental Health Service complaint load. Urban encroachment into agticultural area a is the primacy cause or ncreasing mosquito and fly complaints from citizens demanding relief. This demand has increased our need for close surveillance of the approximately 100 poultry ranches, 300 dairies, and other agriculturally related complaint sources. Citizen complaints are responded to in a timely fashion, usually within 24 hours of reception. Despite con -taut efforts, domestic fly and other vector complaints continue to Increase unchecked throughout the San Bernardino Valley. The communities of Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Upland, Yucaipa, Colton and Fontana are particularly infested. Homeowners continue to turn to County vector control Specialists for advice In controlling household pests, such as flies, cockroaches and cats. Renters seek Department advice in dealing with landlords who won't provide pest control. Unfor- tunately, much of the available funding sources to help combat this ever increasing complaint load relative to urban encroachment type vectors (flies) have dried up. II. Program Coals The main vector contcol program goals are to prevent human disease, discomfort, injuries, annoyance, and economic loss caused by arthorpod -borne disease agents and domestic rodents. 337 III.- rrograa Objectives ., Coordinate an intensive and comprehensive Yucaipa fly Control o s err ntrol program reduce t by March31ny 9sources and coordinate 2. Ontario Target Area a boundaries conditions du. &ag the next h nextfiscalbYear by limiting active rat signs less than 2% In accordance with the Ontario City Contract. 3. Conduct monthly encephalitis virus surveys at the Colorado River between May 1 and October 31. ♦. Inspect each of the approximately 100 poultry ranches on a sic inspection pet year basis. Consult with owners and o pecatocs on manure management and integrated fly control activities. S. Complete 2.000 survey units in the Coltn Rat Control Contract by June 30. ImplemdWaducational and enforcement activities to reduce carrying capacity of the project area. 6. prepare a proposal for a County -wide vector Control District by November 30, 1986. IV. progrr IIntivitlos and bplementetion A. General 1. vector densities periodic disease environmental nd the effective- ness of control measures 2. provide public education in the control of pests based on the principles of integrated pest management. 3. education to and enforcement top then satisfaction appropriate f the County and tha public during the fiscal year. B. Mosquito Abatement 1. Inspect and control known mosquito breeding sources through the use of larvacides and the placement of moequ Ito fish where appropriate. 2. Investigate mosquito complaints to citizens. 3, Enforce provisions inotices and bill for services by issuance as of abate ecessary. 33S 1 1 C. Encephalitis Virus Surveillance (EVS) l the State Identify, Healthy for shipment to Laboratory in Berkley. Z. Control mosquitoes at known and suspected encephalitis area sources. 3. Post warning signs at confirmed encephalitis area Sources. 4. maintain records of field collections and laboratory results. D. Plaque Surveillance 1. endemdic trap areas for ptstings ground by the National Plague Labora- tory. y. Nap all plague a Wyed locations and keep records of Y� results in plague log. 3. ground squirrel carcasses for evidence of plague die of fa 4. Follow guidelines established by the County Plague EnvironmentalD Health n Services, County Department icuultuzal Commissioner, County Department of Public Realth, and the State Department of Health Services. E. Ply Control 1. Conduct inspections of poultry ranches and stablcs on a routine berm.. y. Provide public information brochures on methods the homeowner can use to control adult and larval fly sources in and around private property. 3, innovative Third flycontrolcmeasures in problem Representatives to study areas 4. Study use of volunteers for fly control education and survey activities. Regulate 4 -11 and FF>1 animal projects, conduct hearings, and issue permits as necessary. 539 VI. IM!ar of M 12c Accospllshaents - o Obtained a federal ceseacdh grant or coot cat contcol in the City of Ontaclo, 1978 -1980. 0 Obtained a federal research grant for roof cat control in the City of Ontario, 1978 -1980. o cockroach pe ath at contcol for poverty services efamilies; a1979C1981 vide o pcoceducesn fora plaques c o n tto ln between cStae Health Department, andnCountyl Department o of j Envoironmei al Health cServicesDe 1981t9 , •ent t Silver Homeowners A a o m season; provide adultehiron mid midge control during 1980 -1987. o Obtained a contract with tWCity of Ontario to provide continuing maintenance of tho tadecal" Roof Rat Grant tec;at area after the grant ended; 1980 -19e4. o Received National Association of Counties Award for CSD Coackcoach Vest Control program; 1981- 0 Obtained a qrant from OCO to eradicate Norway cats in the Colton sewer systennm; 1981 -1982. n Designed a "rat gate" to place in sever pipes which prevents rats from traveling upstream; 1981. o inspec- tion Procedures and ucontrol lmethodologiest standardize on poultry ranches, specifically including integrated biological control methods; 1982 -1984. 0 primary se phasiscon mosquito contcol and tinitiated Basin startiup activities; 1984 -1985. VII. rotor* A_ 'ons i.e., additional) federal* financing an to ad various vector c applications for the control of vectors and rats in Ontario and other areas of San Dirnatdino County. At ublic associations or s Special Districts for specialized vector services 340 Cooperate and aster adjoining states and counties along the Colorado River tostudy and control black flies and mosquitoes. Contract with Chino Hills developers for plague surveys as part of the developonnt plan. Establish a county -wide Vector Control District. Establish a county -wide public relations/health education program for vector control. - y/ VIII. Program Enforcement The local law enforcement skills of the Department of Environ- mental Health Services has been finely refined by many years of experience. When new environmental laws are warranted by expanding and changing communities, the Department of Environmental Health Services plays a n active contributing role in the drafting of new legislation. Several prime examples of this Departmental involvement is exemplified in the County's new Nuisance Ordinance and Poultry Ranch Ordinance. These ordinances areas from the ever changing needs of the community and wore then molded and implemented by the Department of Environmental Health Services. Nuisance Ordinance No. Highlights Rodent harborages Stagnant pools Blighted areas Poultr) Ordinances No. Highlights Committee ?a Other County department coordination efforts III. Program Public Relations Educational Endevourn The Vector Control Section offers a complete educational system composed of citizen training public announcemento in vector control and environmental manipulation. The main techniques of citizen educationis a one on one a roach_ by a professional experienced inspector. The citizen training ocess is sontlnually reinforced by repetive instructions from the inspector on anviron- mental manipulation techniques designed to control specific vectors. Vector Control Advertising Several Limos each year, advertising campa! ne_ are initiated by the Department of Environmenca Hoa t Seh ry a to encourage area residents plagued by insects or rodent vectors to notify the Department for assistance. official Press releases are made by the Department of Environments Health ery c—e or the news media (newspapers and television). Other forms of vector public awareness campaigns take the form of community group oresentation■ and utility bill public service vector control program messages. (See Newspaper articles attached.) 3 ua Y. Progres Resources Exiatina Labor, Equipment and Facilities The importance of an organization's resources in terms of person- nel, expertise and equipment is fundamental in its ability to deliver sezvices. The Department of Environmental. Health Services Vector Control Section is composed of a highly trained, highly experienced team of dedicated professionals utilizing the enormous array of apeciallzed equipment available to thw Department from laboratory facilities and County equipment yards, warehouses, and educational resource libraries. Vector Crntrol Staff: Name: Mitchell J. Bernstein, R.S. Position: Supervising Environmental Specialist I Insect and Rodent Vector Control Program Name: H. Bennett Clapp, R.S. Position: Lead Vector ConIVI Biologist Zs Name: Joyce Haggard, R.S. Pcjition: Senior Vector Control Biologist Ontario Office Name: Bill Watson, R.S. Position: Senior Vector Biologist San Bernardino Office Name: Jerry Wong Position: Vector Control Biologist Name: Harry Smith Position: Vector Control Technician Name: John Ramos Position: Vector Control Aide Name: Presently recruiting for Vector Control Entomologist Name: Laura Martinez Position: Clark Laboratory facilities: Modern approved laboratories approved by thm aunty vector or State agencies are a beneficial if not necessary role in vector species Identification, preservation and control. County facilities: Environmental Health Services entomology lab used for insect identification and verification. Equipped with insect keys, dlsecting scopes, collection and preservation equipment. State approved lab facilities: Epidemiology laboratory approved by the State Department of Health Services complete for the coordinaticn of vectorborne epidemiology with Federal and State laboratories. Educational Material: The Department of Environmental Health Services has a complete selection of written insect and rodent training and educational materials in the forms of pamphlets, brochures and circulars. (See attached.) Other forms of vector educational media are available In form of 16mm movies, film strips, and video VSS cassette. These resources scan be utilized for public awareneas presenta- tions. (See attached examples.) Z Equipment- Vehicles, Heavy Machinery and Vector Control Equipment All types of vehicles such as four -wheel drive pickup truck:+ with attached pesticide spray rigs, compact pickups for general field work, tractors for specialized ditch repair and water drainage work, compact ultra low volume portable pesticide sprayers and other vector control paraphenallia are available to complement the Insect and Rodent Vector Control Program. J (/y .e WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 0`.+.: 5950 Schaefer Avenue • Chino, CA 91710 a (714) 591.9835 BOARD OF TRUSTEES CHINO N1maw W Tema MORMLAIR Na M CAae ONTARIO February 20, 1986 Wpw A Svnw SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Gene �/ va a...�. a Vector Control Consultant r Control Nuna.,c N'mn /. 1615 W. Fern DISTRICT MANAGER Redlands, CA 92173 �� CWM SbNln.e Dear Gene, j Enclo3ed please find the West Valley Vector Control District fly control program recommendations for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The program and staffing levels are negotiable to fit the needs of the city The Board of Trustees has asked me to convey to you I's wishes for an 18 month contract. However, the coat figures given in this proposal are for one year only The District is looking forward to assisting the city in an effort to control the domestic fly population within the city. Sincerely, C Ljrle Stotelmyre District Hanger LS /2g Enclosures 'A AvMW b wrylnw w0 a&Vwa,a. IeaM wanes e1,Y,ul a peek nwe, YVAt cap M cem" U eWW a+ta+va,t a9A1'. w CMF� dhweaeq w W&ISM" M tavMeM Meese d hwir,l dMM .. • W ww RANCHO CUCAMONGA FLY CONTROL PROPOSAL February 20, 1986 PROBLEM The Cucamonga -Alta Loos area has • long history of domestic fly problems Which is Wall documented in County Health Department records Sin" incorporation so the City of Rancho Cucamonga, this once sparsely populated area has and rgone rapid residential development. Cittans, new to the area, to explosive seasonal populations of Fannie flies and high levels of house flies turned from the County Environmental Health Department to the now city to request fly control oea_uret be taken. DISTRICT Special Districts are structured to provide for adaptability, for emergency action when needed, and freedom frog "nY of the regulatory systems and restrictions often essential in large county government entities. In contrast, Vector Control prrg,ams under a hbljch department have often been frustrated >i with financial controls, inter- divialonal competitiveness for budget and personnel needs, and lack of adaptability for emergency needs. Therefore, In November 1903, following an expression of concern by citizens ofvensouthwest portion of San Bernardino County that mosquito and fly Populations at an Intolerable level, the County Board of Supervisors formed the West Valley Vector Control District. It was assigned the task of establishing a comprehensive vector control program for the West End o• San Barnardino County Hills. The current boundaries of the District take in the Dairy Preserve, and the wines of Chino. Ontario aad Montclair. EXPERISNCE The Vest Valley Vector Control District management tea% rorsists of two medical entomologists each with over 13 years experience rn Vector Control at the County level, as wall as military, overseas, and prive,c industry. Both the Manager and Assistant - Manager are Registered Public Health Sanitarlaaa with Masters Degrees. Pour Vector Control Specialists are assigned field operational duties and each Specialist is assigned • Vector Control Aids. The District is now entering its third year of operations and is building on an enviable record of achievement in Vector Control. Mosquitoes were targeted ' so its first goal and have been reduced So — 90 percent over population counts _ 1 3y7 r prior to District formation. She District has recently added fly control as its second major program with a goal of reducing fly populations 30 percent by 1988. PROGRAM PROPOSAL Subject to negotiations with the city and its consultant, us propose a fly Program which c.nsints of Survey- lance, Education, Compliance and Control. The staffing level is recommended at one full-time Vector Control Specialist. The District will provide the services of all otter staff an an as needed basis A. Surve,llance • District will establish baited fly craps of its own design to objectively monitor fly population on a weekly basis during the contract. '�!Fw TN. . Monitor degree -day temperatures to predict fly emergence dates. Inspect commercial poultry ranches on a monthly schedule and /or more frequently as needed. . Maintain records of complaints, fly surveys, inspections and control. • Inspect backyard farm animal activities and &cables on a complaint basis. B. Education • Instruct individuals and groups on current fly control measures around the home. • Present information to schools and classe- on current fly control measures. a Beep the media informed of community and specitic fly control progress. C. Compliance • Issue abatement notice* as necessary to correct fly breeding conditions. •� z - 3Y ; .Ar - r . Inveatigate fly complaints by cititens D. Control Reless.s five million Chalclds for biological control of fly larvae and pupae in selected areas. Apply residual adulticides and non - residual aerosol odulticidea, on an emergency basis to prevent dispersal or control local fly outbreaks as determined by district and city fly consultant. Apply residual fly spray to trash dumpsters In commercial areas once per month during the months of Juno, July, August and September. PROGRMI BUDGET Salaries and Benefits Travel Educational Materials Pesticides Passel .a (Chalclds) t .W., 1 $28,500 $1,720 $500 $500 $1.500 $16,720 -- -1. 399 Tu 4 i t; dY 't t� ,t INVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 3 366 North AtrmrMed Annue • San B"nadino. CA 92415 -OI W • (714) 3911617 320 Eat "D" SmRn • Onutio. CA 9176E • (714) M.1324 15579 Eighth Stmt • ViontYNe. CA 92392 • (714) 746-216 PLEASE REPLY TOAD DRESS CHECKED August 23. 1985 Gene ZdLnowski, R.S. Vector Control Consultant 1615 W Fern Redlands CA 92373 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ENVIRONMENTAL "_t PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY KENNETH C TOPPING Do" A Sl.e:C. Co 11 Devpopawm RICHARD L ROBERTS. R S MPH Dveaa MOI,M1.M IM [.WI OI. A H:M A I Banton On Rr.rw Bp W,LW NO Ga.o C1Ra+.aa can» Ra®rtlt /au0, RW.O Gang Ln S.n pmwne LwM La,d, Lb /W MaKb, Vnao.MN SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR COST DATA In response to your inquuii=y of August 20, 1985, the fo)lowing is submitted. I. Annual salary and benefits, Environmental Specialist IIi, Range 'C' (Salaryt $25,119; Benciitst $5,163) $ 30.282/yr. II. Annual administrative overhead costs, approximate 4,700 /yr. (Based upon a formula which considers per- centages of total complaints; permits; and other fiscal, personnel, and management support activities). III. Monthly cost to operate a county vehicle Sedan or compact; $200 /month + 200 /mile 400 /mo. Or; Compact pickup; $210 /month + 210 /mile 420 /mo. IV. private mileage reimbursement rate, FY 85/86 290/mi. a� I Hope the above information is satisfactory and meets your ne)ds. Please feel free to contact Jon xindschy, Chief of Management Support at 383 -1098 if you have further questions. I look forward to working with you on the Rancho Cucamonga fly control project. ilk RICHARD 'ROBERTS, R.S., MPH RLR:dc Director cc: Jon Kindschy Kenneth Jeske NEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 3060 Schaefer Avenue a Chino. CA 91710 a 17141691-9835 W October I8, 1985 Gen, Zdurvvo6t 1615 w rlrn P.edlanda, ;A 92771 Dear Gene: As requested in your letter of September 24, 1985, regarding the Rancho Cucamonga proposal, I am Submitting our projected coats for those Stems you requested. °-1r Vector 8lologiet annual salary and benefits - $28,478 00 Administrative overhead - $2,892 00 (clerical, supervision, accounting, payroll, uniforms and office apace) Vehiclu costs 8 1,000 otles /month - 53,660 /year Current vehicle reimbursement for private vehicle use is 10 5c per mile Ve look foreword to meeting with you to discuss this proposal in greater detail at your convenience. Sincerely yours, Lyle St lmyre District Manager LS /jg 3S/ 4 aC X { f 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 a�. w Fly Density Survey mgr AMA a Gene Zdunowski Vector control Conwltant 1615W FM • Redlarxk U 92373. MQ 825-7614 i I TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Swvw StnW Rmlts. . . .... 4,5,6 0enclusim . ......................... ............. Table I "SWI@sof Flies . ............. . . —.7 TaDle2 Table2A Table 3 *Rwdw Table 4 TwltrV Rooth InsWim 10 CtWtl Chart 2 *2 OrWng by 12 Owl 3 "21.1nopprom[Rolluss bVQLe"t --------------- MW I - SumW Que"ts ............. _ __.... _.._..._._...._.. »I4 3,53 INfR00t1CTlON + The City of Raldeo Cucem%w Ilas within an ores which is an optimum micro- climate ( altitude/ prmcimlytomountslro ,vsgetellon,tampsre!wviu eee(e)forlhedtielopmentor& number of public health significant fy speclea The City also Iles within an area that was historicaly agricultura), which isnt Itnif to an earlier rural sNt1n4 This In turn encouraged nlmal ararin pursults. In major agriculture (predomir:nlly paltry) and hobby /4WFFA These factors, coupled with no madst" refuse collection, has led the City to a histrlol fly populatcn In prnetully Preilous studies condcted In relghboring communities, steered IM Sox or Ole fy poputallon came from major ogrio pure, and 502 of the fy population come from the chime al Iage Contributing factors Included animal droppings (ran dYAW.Ic pats; ccmpoet PIWO Of gerb%p, gram and Names; ovr -rlpmo frults and veOetebtes from fr4VrldnetyoudN ; solid waste, refuse and gerbegeecaantiWi l findivldualhwsehol,4c Infad,studlealeeveshownthat SSr- wlUwul a fy tot lid each refuse cmlelnr is cepeble of producing n a+rago of 200 files pr week If garbage is not collected at lest coma weekly With the eforamtli ned factors In mind, the City Council directed that a stervy be canductad to dNrmine the -." of W problem, the major fly development sass, the evaluslvr of aunt poult y rnrh fly mntrol metMda. and Oelwmlro moor speew, Contained brain re the mal tsofthe City ofRoheCtcamor 'sFyDaalySurvey. '3s f 1 Determine the retwo ad extant of the M problems in the qty of Rancho DJWW19L 2 Establish U» ImporWloe cf Ur smroee d fly KoWlon Umt @Kist wlthhn the community In animal ralslnq owatl ns, mlbntlol promisee, @d W w acllvnites assoclatad with the wing of mymlc meWfals. 3. Establish the Importanos of the major agrIcullural source In mnmKnitj � ?u 4. DocumntpracthouneponsIbM for those Mp roductionvimes. S. Iomtlfy Swiss round, UmIr seeeorrI pronlonce, dlstrlbullon, and U@Ir aaocallon w1US varlous orgmlo media 6. Develop romInm@clolWa edingtooPir reaslenpWarn. `3'SS 2 the anN was designed to include two major categories In :he City of Rancho Cucamonga (t) all poultry rances, ( 2) gran sons anplingofmkbntaladcanmwclelareas. The poultry ranches were impacted by the Vector Control Consultant aoowdbq to the sland" set by the Tri -County Committee on poultry ranch stand" (which included San Bernardino County). The residential and commercial areas were surveyed by the Vector Control Consultant and two Vector Control Techniclans Three different methods were used to collect data on all factors which might effect fly production I) The Poultry Rani Insnectlan form (Table 4) was also developed by the Tri-ODunty Committee to collect data an factws4 relating to ranch management which omWbuts to M development and breedbp This form Is also used to establish a fly population density rating sore. This soon considers thMarval, pupal and adult densities. and It can be used to Ts establlsh w wther the ranch Is In violation of Qwny Standards. 2) The Rancho Oxama,u FN Sirnv frm ( TOW) was developed by the Vector fon'fcl Consultant to called data on factors In Ve resldntlel and business ess communities that contribute to M development and breeding. This form, too, was developed to gat e M dnsiy rating score to the community The communlywee then ccmpred to the major agricultural sources In larval and pupal densities to mortein wteth(r It meets the standards sat for the agricultural community. 3) Th Lwyel and Pupal Dannity Retina 3mre was used In both of the aforementioned forms and works as follows 0 - when a sample Is taken and no larva r pupa re found that sample Is rem rded as e '0' , 5 - when a sample Is taken ad some leave and pupa are found but are observed with dlfflculty that sample is worded as e S' , 10 - when larva and pupa ere easlly observed In e sample that sample is. a= as e'10' , 20 • when a sample Is ford that has as may larva and pupa as breeding needle that sample Is, am as a'20' The sample scores are then sided and divided by the number of samples taken and a "Larval and Pupal Density Rating soon is established in major agricultural operations a density of 7.5 or greeter Is grounds for a Notice of Violation by the Countys Dept of Emiiraunental Health Swvinss. Twelve different blocks were doom at random from a City of Rerche Qxamorigl DevelopmentDistrlctsHp. Eachblodt(awMap I)hademinimumuxnlneprmitnsnWWot rendem end surveyai by the Vntar Bloloplst Teem. Since a thwough examination was n ecaewy to locate all (reeding sources, the tome owner was contacted avid Informed of the survey before anyexeminetbn took place. .3S(� 3 The survey resulted In the ldntlflatlon of two predominant speolesFmkaarhkv/rlr, and Haraatmaelk a. Tleee organisms we' at ollo In thelr dlslrlbutln. Howswer, due to the time of the yew that the survey was conducted, Fmk was the specie found In the largest numbers. See Table I and 3, and Chrt I A few facts are necessary here to discuss the basic b!oIV of (Iles. Using ue louse M as an example, we can give the reeer an understanding of the saps of the problems Involved in fly control. The blolWoff &rfs will also bementload Tho biology of the rouse fly. Haaaar abowi psasa through a complex life cycle as shown In Table 2A. Then are egg, hews (maggot), pupa, and adult. Egg le✓Inhg begins about 4 days after mating The fault Dgc" approximately 1200 eggs In her Ilfatime. Each agg �z hatches In B to 30 hays. Aftr hatching a small warm like larve erewle out to fed and go through grawlin stage to reach pupation. This larval stage an takes as little e 3 days to complels Once the larva reecho Us next stage called pupation it no longer 13 maple end feeding It is enekgxeto the oaaanof the butterfly. within the pupa ore the Irvaurdae mCahorphoals (to d" form) and when completed the adult fly smrgse Tha pupal stage cen take a little a 4 days to complft So the reads an rote that In as little as 7 -E days the Ilft cycle an be compfeled M adult haul 17y, lives approximately two weeks, and Is (ood predominantly In Southern California frcm May toOctober The colelar months force the adults to 'over- wlntr'by slaying bidtn In small worm area until the water warms ono again to lamsaratures favorable for fly breading. The leaser louse M. ismkaemkvkwht paw through the anus life cycle a the house fly Hxvevsr, this fy' over - summers' as e larva or adults In some cool, try plea The egg to adult cycle can very from 10 to 100 days dgnding o a tempralus and molstur s of the treading media. Adult flies can live from 30 to 90 days A fell, winter, spring fly (Oct. to atay),Fessle females rest on environmental surfaces while the males exhlblt the ciao @elm Idle Jerky, hovering (light In shedd ores This flight pattern Is exhibited for the benefit of the fault of the spates, es it Is a meting dmw of sorts 9hn10e011W aid Rutlom Table I presents. In order, the species af ales observed during the survey. Please note tie refix a to brW g madis All of throe was observed with vrlau slap$ of fly development dring the seuW. Table 3 demonstrates at whet percentages these vrfous so rms were found breading Ines within the blocks that were surveyed Table 3 eta slows a summery of Use fy survey data oolleclad In the city. �S A total of 139 lots or parcels of lad. consisting of 12 survey quadrants, wore erolusw That' were primarily rssldesllal (8511). The remaining 152 wen Commercial. The agricultural suwy will be adlyesed sprNay. Over one third (362) of ruWm and businesses had ecitw fly breading, the rape of each pmdranl Is shamn In Chart 2. The survey represents a larval and pupal dowiy rating scam tar the community (without agriculture) of 2.42. Compared to the major agricultural wmmunlly rating of1 .56. This demonstrates that iha residential and business community Is drrenty producUp llles at a grower froqu incy then the agricultural community The most prevalent attractants were of dg droppings (38111) and refusa(482), which Include garbage end trash (see Chart 3). Unapproved refuse Containers for fly control purposes (sax) In cludw those contains that ware made fry light by the use of plastic bpi Since a ft' can enter aly8'cpNng.acon wlhaveafytightiktobe approved Alrp portion of tha cans fr pected were battered or'Q no Ifds at ell. s Table 3 danaroUalr that. depending on the neighborhood o rd tkm grow clippings, Ca ooet pibs, or vwbA tarp animals (horses, Cattle. goats, etc) Could account for more than 502 of the fly breading &area. Mdor Amlad „re Within Ifs boundaries the City has 6 commercial paltry ranch cp"Ime remaining As proviay mentioned all of then operations were surveyed to assrtain their cantribullon to the overall City wide M population dimly. the Vectr Control Caaawllant was a — panled by tM general ranch manager to each facility. As seen by the attached *poultry ranch hhspectlen ;rms' each ranch was rated for larval and pupal density as well as adult population dimity. Adult daniltes are taken to 1) defamlne Control messres; 2) determine attracWnl migration; 3) Mormine emergahoa Each ranch was current/ In Us beginning stages of a 'fa powlta wading' program. This program to used In conjunction with the other Intagraleei peat management pracikra already Implemented an 0he ranches. TM rancas utlUm predators and the pad system fr retolnlrg those predators when they claim at County ordinances Currently In effect, and originally adopted by the City, state Uwl a 6' to 8' pad of manure must b left under tha cages to fact III* drying ad retain fly pr odstrs. Each ranch met Cowy steodads and had auhellent fly control at ur time of Inspadion/evaluMlon (1.56 average larval and pupal dcnslty rating scan). The highest ld.P wnel y was 3.67 and the caveat UP demly, was 0.33 In manures sample& Maws from over 200.000 birds was examined Since the lesser hags fly Is IM predominant fy collected from poultry mrare from October to nay. the any premlxs f=V In this survey that hod Mawr densities of faw/#42 than the paltry randwe were these with large animals or Mary axumulatlons of smell animal drapplsnpt. Since lest )ears M complaint period, one ranch has Man torn down Othr ranch management dwnpw by IM paltry ranch operator are the Installation of new cup wearing systems on some randies and now modernizing updates for sane of Uw older cup waterers. A The survey conducted from 10 -85 to I1 -65 found the lesser house N. fmk aeamxrvfrv; as Ile predominant species Health Department records show the low house fly cawing Uw majority of citizen complaints. accusing principally commercial poultry rerrrwe The KWfJdrnmwtrsW that the community at Irp Is a , m 39V producing an owl or mnoanl of Ihls sparse. B. M avenge of 362 of IM oanmuiy is producing a minimum of 502 of ft fly population. C. The commercial poultry ranch opratlans (major agrlallre) are prod ring 332 to 50s of tat M population D. In Uw survey of residential and business premise;, the majority of Uvo ettraimts and sources were grbaga and other refuse In rian The house M was the mat Kmbnt larva found Ot1W sources contributing to Uw discovey of the maze; pndominert lessor have fy populations, Included graas clippings, small and large brlywl animal wastes, end oompust piles. E. In order for the City of Radio Cummo ge to have unobjectionable fly populations It will be necessary ( oral] segments o( Unoanmunlyto contribute I- fry control. This cants, - pllshW Usual the uses full ll=Ysctar Control Biologist, In addition to, the enforcement o( weekly refuse collection and the use of approved refuse containers, 35F 6 i Sclentl tic Name Ounmon Name CammonOr"Inp me" .................................... ............................... fsr7fsar7AXrI&Yr Lee IftussFly Laswandrtascompael, poultry e WWor animal MWA", Certain fruit end Y"Olbte wastes. Nana Fly All animal manures, prbepe carrion, animal W. fruit aid Y""le wastes. /`4[i8 FaInStableFty Same asabave starat" Stable Fly Cattle, %rse and rabbit manure gross clippings, wet feed for Irganlmais, PlAWkM.so Orson Bottle Fly Ortape, mast scraps, cwrWn aa�,p BleokperbspeFly Orbepe Pin► Blue Batik Fly hekrrepes.gorbepe.cerrkm '560 7 a L11 Gene Zdurtowski Vector Control Consultant 1615 w Fm • Redlanda G 92373 • (714) e2i2614 RANCHO CUCMIONGA FLY SURVEY Survey Quadrant 0 P.-silence Zone 0 Business Street �,- Boundary street4 SPFCIFS 0 E;mla_so () tj19 = () tluscina so. () stomo4s so. 0 0ohyra so. S!2!lECE. 0 Dog droppings 0 Horse manure 0 Otter large animal 0 Refuse container 0 Grass clippings 0 Compost piles 0 Other REFUSE fMJTAINERS- 0 Approved O Unapproved STAGE OFD VEi MINT' 0 Egg 0 Larva 0 Pupa 0 Adult LARVAL AND PUPAI DENSITY' 0 Rarely observed 0 Observed with difficulty 0 Easlly observed 0 Heavy concentrations VECTOR BIOLOGIST Date N EGG STAGES OF FLY DEVELOPHENT L4VA 4W PUPA ADULT 3G 1 8A T� `V Zf A 8 C I D I E I F I SumwwWant Oued-nt I Oaatrnt 2 Ouedranl3 Ooedrenl 4 Oua&anl5 2 t t Tara Low On. Lbmmerdel ow Lcw Off. POW -A- Very Lcw 9 9 13 12 12 10 O 442 442 46; 4 ; 42X s Derul RMI 2.78 2.78 38s 2.s 2.5 7 2 owed Refuse 565 100; INS 42; 100; 8 SFennl 332 IIS 31; 25ZI as 9 02 422 sex 432 4OXI 2SS 10 202 11 R Source Dropping 44A OR 38R 25S OR 12 R Snurce6rass cllRpinw RSouru_ComPa.IPlles ASaurcnlcrgukimaI YSourc�-Rcltra __ 561 Ilx OR SuA OR 23R ISR 172 OS 13 OS SR OS 14 OA 442 OR BR OS 15 692 Sa; 4 ; `V Zf 3�s9 J 1 ant 6 *m&anl 7 Ojo&ant 8 Wntanl9 ant 10 Qji&ant 1 t t 3 LowfVery Low Very Lev Ywy tow Very Lcw Very Low Low LOW 4 10 9 12 12 14 IS 12 5 302 22X 50S 422 502 7X a2 6 1.5 1.67 375 375 321 0.331 0.42 7 402 02 422 sex 432 4OXI 2SS a 202 222 42A 25X 712 132 17S 9 10 I1 3OR 33A 67A 582 502 602 502 12 301 112 172 17A 142 OA 02 13 302 112 172 25f 362 OS 02 14 IOR 02 33S SOR 712 02 OA 502 Of 502 75R 642 40E 52 3�s9 000000 i 0 00 0 m 00000 ❑00013m o$ . Fy° ,� g s 0013000 0285 O0 0 <oc„ 00009 000009 � m H F $ s - 00000130 OX 00 0� 00 00 Y2 00000 N:� z �' s° S S ❑00000 ❑ y Op 0 00000 OO ❑ ❑❑ z q 8 Sr c ` LA 000000 r 12 O x 130 ❑ o 0000 - 00000 c z p M 13 13 00 Y- O C NT S NO � N m Y O r� n a2Rs Qom" 9 z s a =;.a ag' "�� -'2 ? T, a ppp�Nq 2L g cE N 4 at o r 5 10 ca ; 21 2 cm o 3�► 3 a o x°s ¢0y g 'R� F • _ Base _ wawuo z 13O ; 4 F s 00000 ❑ ❑00 5 0000 000m i 5 orQiY asO9 SmO9 > r 0 2n A Rl o is •^ -I ri. bn � D r b M$$1NgS T 0Y 2 �$g� 2 000 =r g 0 $ °n_a na Ina 5: 000c a g gx Rl o.s a m £ m2 r a • 3 S 3 N i N 0 0000 = 0000 2 w c 9 ; 00 o i O +G. O r C A am 3g o �; �g mm; r 13 o Q° S•az, n.�� o X t n r 3G 10 N= a L 0 8091 70X 60R 50R 40X 30R 20X 10R OR Chart) 9 Famia sp. by 0uadrant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,34Y 11 T%T 0 509 459 409 359 309 259 209 159 109 59 09 Chart ]. 9 Breeding by Quadrant 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 34 b 12 Chwt 3 9 Unapproved Refuse by Quadrant 1003 903, 8 zs 03 703 603 SOR 403 r 303 203 103 OR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 f� v J rl� J 4 34713 ` ra 7 n U n U CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT Date, April 14, 1986 u1 1977 To, Citv Council and City manager From, Bill Holley, Community Farvices Director Subject, Historic Preservation Commisalon Recommendation Regarding the Lodig House, 5702 Amethyst. Agenda Item 7 -B The H tonic Preservation Cotalsslon is recommending that Council designate the Lc ig House, 5702 Amethye: Street, a City Historic Landmark. The Commis -ion has reviewed the historic signiffcsnce of the house and has determined that it meets the criteria established 10 qualify for each designation. As additional informatlo`&f the house is located directly in the path of the proposed westerly extension of Wilson Avenue. Should the house bo declared a Historic Landmark, the coat of relocating the house at such tiny thAt Wilson is extended woald, most likely, D• oxpacted to be borne by the City. -36F RESOLUTION NO. P6— A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE LEDIG HOMESTEAD, LOCATED AT 5702 AMETHYST STREET, AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGE AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. imams, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has adopted Chapter 2.26 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historic preservation, and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission has investigated thu historic significance of the Ledig Homestead and has held public hearings concerning that site in accordance with Chapter 2.26 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historic preservation, and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has found the Ledig Homestead to be a significant historic feature of the City, and thereby recommends it for designation w City Historic Landmark. s .7 .S NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows, • The City Council finds and deterninas that the Ledig Homestead, located at 5702 Amethyst, has met the criteria established for designation as a City Historic Landmark, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Comalasion, designates this site as a City Historic Landmark. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. AYES, NOES, ABSENT, ATTEST, Beverly A. Authilet, City Clerk 3ia�f2 Jeffrey King, rAyor s s City of Rancho Cucamonga Application for 1116TORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION x Historic Landmark IDENTIFICATION 1. Common Ni Historic Point of Interest 2, Historic Name, if known: Iedia Homestead _ 3. Street or Rural Address: s7n? Amethyst St. City: Alta Immn Zip: 91701 County$ S. Bernedinq Assessor's Parcel No. 1062- 071 -08 Zone: 91701 Legal Description: Parcel 1 - map 4433 - book 40 Page 67 4. Present Owner, if known: J.M. Choate Address: 5702 Amethyst CSty:Alta Loma Zip:_ 91701 Ownership Ss: public private x 5. Present ULO:Pr -lvnta Residence Original Use: Some Other past uses: No known other uses DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: ? tnry Victorian residence w/ original stone porch and exterior. Rear kitchen expanded and bath added by Col. Harr In May 1947 0riai Mil front room expanded approx_. 1935. All a. eu send finish wells and ceilings 7. Location sketch map (draw k labs site and surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks): 5702 Amethys. ` - 1. Kitchen /bath -1947 2. Front Room Extension 1935 (approx.) 3. Original Nome I t w /Pew exceptions 8. Approximate property size: Lot Size (in feet) Frontage_89' Depth 2W or approx. acreage 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent_ b. Good x c. Fair_ d. Deteriorated__ e. No longer in existence 10. Is the feature: a. Altered?_ b. Unaltered? X 11. Sur,•oundings: (check more than one it necessary) a. Open land b. Residential x c.'Scattered buildings d. Densely built -up L2 1- t 3 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persona associated with the site when known): Apparently one of 1a homes built by the Ledly faxily Just before the turn of the century. Later sold (date not obtained) to Col. Herr rho resided here until the late 60's as best I cart tell. TI dates could be wrong by a smell margin. Sold to Del S Nov. 1985 when sold to Jill 6 Michael Choate 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture b. Arts A Iaisure c. Economic /Industrlal d. Government o. Exploration /Settlement x f. Military . g. Religion h. Social /Education 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates: San Bernad)no County Building Dept. "The Alta Loma Book., 23. Date form prepared Feb 6. 1986 By (name) Address: 57n2 Amethyst St. City:Alte inma 21p:91701 Phone:(714) 980-2327 Organization: Owner a 12. Threats to Site: ta. None known_ b. Private development x c. Zoning d. Public Workp Project_ o. Vandalism_ f. Other =Per pplan shows street 13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s)Dec. 1985 throunh house. NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only. 14. Primary exterior building material: 7a. Stone b. Brick c. Stucco d. Adobe e. Wood % f. Other ` 15. Is the Structure: a. On its original site? yes b. Moved? an c. Unknown? 16. Year of Initial Construction: 1899 (estimated) This Date is: a. Factual b. Estimated x 17. Architect (if knowK): tedin, (assumed) ' 18. Builder (if known): Ledia (assumed) 19. Related Features: a. Darn b. Carriage house___ c. Outhouse d. Shod(s) e. Formal Garrlon(s) f. Windmill g. Watertouer /.ankllouse • h. Other 1. None__ 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persona associated with the site when known): Apparently one of 1a homes built by the Ledly faxily Just before the turn of the century. Later sold (date not obtained) to Col. Herr rho resided here until the late 60's as best I cart tell. TI dates could be wrong by a smell margin. Sold to Del S Nov. 1985 when sold to Jill 6 Michael Choate 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture b. Arts A Iaisure c. Economic /Industrlal d. Government o. Exploration /Settlement x f. Military . g. Religion h. Social /Education 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates: San Bernad)no County Building Dept. "The Alta Loma Book., 23. Date form prepared Feb 6. 1986 By (name) Address: 57n2 Amethyst St. City:Alte inma 21p:91701 Phone:(714) 980-2327 Organization: Owner a CITY TAFF cn REPORT DATE: April 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner �i A EE O-A�pDETSTM COUNCIL SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT — TD�TD� 1. BACKGROUND: On March 20, 1985, the City Council approved the consu an contract with ic Forma - Planning Network for the development of the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan and Environmental Assessment. The approved work program calls for the formation goals and Ad Hoc Committee t aecificfnFlane throughtothefstud,YV9pis and objectives of the Co®unity tnvolvemen 1s crucial t the Specific Plans success. that the f0f Committee bet initiated ias� early s possible Into fthe process- A minim= held tofocu eight the c woorkshops With the Ad Hoc Committee will 1 Identify issues with input from the subarea p Review background tuforoation and hold ,y subarea `wides and objectives y subarea and study area 3. design goal' and alternatives and discuss urban q Review alternatives /preliminary goals and objectives and identification of significant issues. 5. Review ic fpreferred issues. alternatives and address 6. Review of the draft plan. T. review. revised plan for Planning Commission 8, As needed. 870 ..IM v City Council Staff Report Subcommittee Appointment April 16, 1986 Page 2 The involvement of the Ad Hoc Comittee as it relates to the entire study process is shown graphically on the attached chart. II. REC@M NDATION: City Council appoint a subcommittee to work with sUff—TH L5— development of a recommendation for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Ad Hoc Comittee. Respectfully subp#ted Brad Buller City Planner BB:jr `� T Attachment . e �. gf L C C c 0 o T LL 7� I ,• R 0 N w �k �a Q TS W Q 1 H!