Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986/05/21 - Agenda Packet
Crry OF •CITY � - AGENDA Lions Park C"W"ty Center 9161 Base Line Road Reecho Cucamonga, California lfal. -21- t s All items submitted loz the Ci4 Conseil dezdliae for asbmittioj ebus i[taa seetl3g. Th. ^1ty Clark`s office r is Ss00a io. � the gsdaead Prior me sosi�es em. � ce. 1• PlOdge Of Allegiance lace to Plag. 2. Roll Call, Mikels Dsbl 1. Buquat 1. Riag ,. and Vright 1• Thursday. C01MISSIav puy 22. 1986 130 Line Road, - LL ens Park Co P.M. nmuaity Center, - AD9ISOR! 9161 pace 2• Vedueeday, SI011 Vq. 28. 1945 7=00 - Line It Lisa Road. Linos Park Coesa+o - PLABRI80 iq Ceotar, 9161 Base - 3. tattoo 1986, of s Proclasation declaring Ms. 19 _ 19M , as Small Business Veek in the Cucamoaga. City of Rsaebo a City Council Netting -2- May 21, 1986 C. CABOT CAr,m♦eas " The following Coaaeat Calendar items are expected to be routine and am- costroresaial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time mithoet diacessioa. 1. Approval of Varraats. Register go's. 5 -21 -86 sod 1 Payroll ending 1 -9 -86 and 5 -1 -86 for the total amuumt of $903.950.73. 2. Approval to receive and file curre_t Investment 7 Schedule •o of May 14. 1985. 3. Receive Claim (CL 86 -22) against the City by Susan 17 Slisabeth Lawson for personal injuries agar the corner of Base Line and Vineyard. 4. Rnceive Claim (CL 86 -23) against the City by Brian J. 18 and Lisa Lessard for an automobile accident at the lutarsectioo of Sass Lino.a d- Spruee. 5. Receive Claim (CL 86 -24) against the City by Dwight D. 21 Martin personal property damages at 7583 Archibald. 6. Receive Claim (CL 86 -25) against the City by Joey Ray 22 Alice for personal injuries at the intersection of Campus and 19th Street. 7 Approval to purchase traffic signal controllers for 25 1985 -85 traffic signal construction program for $35.509.50 from Traronea. Ioc.. the low bidder. 8. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion. 26 TRRRA VISTA PLANBTD -OPMDRTTT - LMS ROMrS Accept: Naintanneee Guerae[ae Bnn :• Tr. 12316. 12317. 12364, (Medians, Parkway*, Interior Planting 6 Local Street Trees) $ 9,000.00 Tr. 12315 -1, 12317 -1, 12364 -1 (Medians, Partway 6 Trails) $11,600.00 Tr. 12364 -1 (Street Improvement and ` Landscaping $17.470.00 Tr. 12316- (Street Improvement cad Laadaeapiag $36,000.00 Tr. 12317 -1 (Street Improvement and Medians) $15,400.00 4 City Council Meeting -3- Release: Fa(ebful Perfarmanee Boeda Tr. 12316, 12317, 12364 (Hedlcns, Parkways, Interior Planting 6 Local Street Trees) $ 90,000.00 Tr. 12316 -1, 12317 -1, 12364 -1 (Medians and Trails) $116,000.00 Tr. 12364 -1 (Street Improvement and Landscaping) $174,700.00 Tr. 12316 -1 (Street Improvement and Landscaping) $360.000.OD Tr. 12317 -1 (Street Improvement and Medians) $159.500.00 M. J. BROCK AND 1 2RAC2N II17] ' MD 11173 -1 MEDHI (LOCATED AT THE H007fl$ a`Oa!!TM QP 19TH MD ARCHIBALD AVENUE) Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond M. 11173) $15.000.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Tr. 11173 -1) $22,500.00 9. Approval to release T.D.P. Bonds in the amount of $2,500 for Tract 12090, USA Properties. Ice. for Salo, Office located at Arcbibald and Force. 10. Approval of Lien Agreement between the Foothill Cocmuniciet Chureb of the Hararena and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improveuents at 9944 Higblaad Avenue. RESCLUTION 90. 86 -142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THE FOOTHILL COMMUNITIES COURCH OF THE NAZARESE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 11. Approval of Resolution establiabing feet in lieu of undergrounding utilities required by Planning Commission approval. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -143 A RESOLUTI(! OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. 23TABLISHING FEES IN LIEU Of UNDEAGROUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES YC31. _ 4UIRED BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL May 21. 1966 28 32 38 39 63 r� 1 J City Council Meeting -4- May 21, 198b 12. Approval of Parcel Nap 7441 located on the north side 64 of Lomita Drive, 321 feet vent of Amethyst Avenue, submittcd by Donald Tackett. RESOLUTION 90. 66 -144 66 A RESOLUT106 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7441 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7441) 13. Approval of Map. Improvement Agreement, and Improvement 67 Security for Tract 130278 located on the southwest corner of Highland and Etivanda Avenues, submitted by The William Lyon Company. 77 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONC[ . CALIFORNIA, APPROVING �y ;MOVEMENT AGREEM , IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF MCI 13027 14. Approval of Nap, Improvement Agreements and Improvement 78 Security for Tract 12832 located on the north side of Victoria Park Lane and the vest side of Victoria Windrows Loops, submitted by the William Lyon Company. 96 RESOLUTION 30. 86 -146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING ' tMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS. IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACY 12872 15. Approval of intention to annex Tract 12833 into Street 97 Lighting District /l, an annexation No. 15. and Street Lighting District f3 as aooszatinn No. I- 98 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT lot ANNEXATION 30. 15 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTEFANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 i� city council Mesa% -s- May 21, 1966 RESOLUTION N0. 86 -148 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DZCLAR33G ITS INTENTION IO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTMICT 110. 1. til ASSESSMENT DISTRICTt DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANHRUTION 00. 15 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINIENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTION THERETO RESOLUTION 110. 86 -149 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 01 CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION 10. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTEMANCINI�,QLSTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 66 -150 112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING KA13TENANCE DISTRICT 80. 1. An ASSESSMENT DSSTRICTt DESIGNATING SAID ANNEYATIUS AS ANNEXATION NO- 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 50. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 16. Approval to accept "Street Or Higbvay Easement" from 114 the Southern Pacific Transportation Company for the Archibald Avenue Railroad Ccoeaitg (No. BBO. 522.90) widening aottb of Base Line Road. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -151 118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPRO7100 AND ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT SETVEIN THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE ARC913ALD AVENUE RAILROAD CROSSING (N0. BBO- 522.90) VIDENIEG BORTH OF EASE LINE ROAD " City Council Meeting -6- May 21, 1986 17. Approval tr seek bids for the construction of the 119 Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, from Footbill to Base Line and to fund this project from IDA Article 3 and Archibald Beautification Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -152 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS POR THE "ARCrIBALD AVENUE SIDEWALKS, FROM FOOTHILL TO BASE LINE", IN SAID CITY AMD AOThORIZINC AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE IO RECEIVE BIDS 18. Approval to seek bids for Base Line Sidevalk 124 Improvement, north side from 600 feet east to 1300 feet oast of Hermosa Avenue. RPSOLOTIOOc7.,t 86 -153 125 :„� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI..MCA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TUN BASE LINE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT. IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING TEE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 19. Approval of amendment to 1985 -86 Housing 129 Repair /Rebabilication Loan with San Bernardino County (CO 85 -256). 20. Approval of agreement with the Vest valley Vector 134 Control District for services in the amount of $37.000.00. 21. Approval of acquisition of an IBM Personal Computer /AT 135 (Advanced Technology) system, enhanced color graphics subsystem and softvare for Assessment district nassgemant reporting and - eleprocessing access to County Assessor add Ias Coll ctor databases. Total cost not to exceed $8,800.00. 22. Approval of Park add Recreation Improvement District 137 (Heritage ■cd Red Hill Community Park) ordering the prepa•.ation of the required Engineer's Report, approving Report of Engineer, declaring its intention to provide for an annual levy and collectico of assessments in a special assessment district and �s(} setting time a.d place for public hearing for June 4, 3s 1986. 1 M t•' City Council Meeting -7- RESOLUTION NO. 86 -150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING TOE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S "REPORT" FOR A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 85-1551L A RESOLUTION OF I08 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGIBEER'S "REPORT" FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASBESSMENTS VITUS AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 86 -137 X A RESOLUTION OF THE QjW7y COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOSCA.- TALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND SETTING A TIME AID PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TORREON 23. Approval to grant sanitary &ever easement to CCHD to allow California Retirement Villas service their property located in the northwest corner of Red Bill Cocmnity Park. 24. Approval of the conceptual park design for the six acre plus neighborhood park located in Victoria Groves phase of the Victoria Planned Coaunnit7. 25. Approval of Resolution supportiog the 1966 State Park Bond Act (Proposition 43). RESOLUTION NO. E6 -156 •F A RESCLOTIOO OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 43 WHICH PLACES BEFORE THE VOTERS OF CALIFORNIA, JUNE 3, 1986, A BOND MEASURE TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PASS AND RECREATICRAL LAND ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER RELATED PURPOSES May 21, . 986 139 141 143 x� 146 150 167 168 City Council Meeting -8- May 21. 1986 26 Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 169 Security for Tract 0066 located on the south aide of 19tb Street, east of Amethyst, submitted by Hill William Development. Faithful Performance Bondi $306,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $153,000.00 RESOLUTION 80. 86 -122 k 178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13066 27. Set public bearing for June 4. 19860 for approval of 1 Annual Engineer's Report and to levy and collect astesoments for Landecapa�intenance District Has. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. RESOLUTION 80. 86 -140 r 197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APFR07AL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 90. 2. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 30. 3. LANDSCAPE MAIRTFMAMCH DISTRICT 90. 4. AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 RESOLOTIOO 90. 86 -139 -b 198 A RESOLUTION OF TUC CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITEIR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00. 2. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 80. 3. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 90. 5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1986 -87 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 19121 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING EJECTIONS THEREI. 28. Set public hearing for June 4, 1986 for approval of 200 Annual Engineer's Report and to levy and tolleeL aassasmeate for Street Ligb•1 g Maintenance District Hoe. 1, 2, 3, and 4. ,. 3 City Council Meeting -9- May 21, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -141 211 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IRS CITY OF RANCHO COCAM!VGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT SO. 1, SHEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00. 2. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AND STREET LIGRIING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 RESOLUTION 110. 86 -138 IC 212 A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY , OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLAR13C ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTERANCE DISTRICT NO. I. STREET LIGHTING I"TENMCE DISTRICT NO. 2, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 80. 3. STREET LIGMW., KkIRT0ANCE DISTRICT _ 80. 4. FOR THE FISCIC YEAH 19t$ -87 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; MD OFFERING A TIME AND PiACE FOR PEAKING OBJECTIONS THERETO 29. Set public hearing for June 4s 1986 - Appeal of Planning Commission decision - Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 12902 - Woodland Pacific. 30. Set public bearing for June 4, 1986 - Environmental Assesseeat and Develc ;sent Code Ameadcert 66 -01. 31. Set June 4. 1986 - Appeal ^f Pleoui.ng Commission (can- advertised) decision - Environmental Assessment and Development Review 85 -53 - Anderson. 32. Set June 4. 1986 - Appeal of Planning Commission (non - advertised) decision - Environmental Assessment and Development Review 85 -22 - Edvards Cinema. ,r i� C00GII. 70ftfflle 1. MINIMUM LOT 91229 FOR STACIE FAMILY 5rTkCO2D MD = 214 LM-111L HOUSING (DAHL). — It is suggested that all � single family detacbed and zero lot line developmeitc have at least a 6000 sq. ft. minimum size. 4. i, 'r s City Council Meeting -10- Pay 21, 1986 2. PHOPOSBD MODIFICATIONS TO MULTIFAMILY DEYELOPMINT 215 [� STANDARDS - Council will consider modificettons of _ development standards to bring apartments to a, ronecoiniva standards. The Council will also consider ` minimum !welling sizes for all residential units, and r modifications of parking standards to include garages. + I. CONSIDERATION OF APPOIHTMNNTS SO TRR p00TRILL BOOLFj= 222 + SPECIFIC PAN An HOC OQMJ=. s. aNFQYISNm 14N I_t� we�cH 1. ADDITION OF CHAPTER R.1B TO THE RANCRO WC=s MUNICIPAL CODE CONG NING COMMEIC AL AND INDUS131AL REFUSE COLLECTION - Establisbing of perforawnco standards and criteria for commercial and industrial refuse collection permit. ORDINANCE 30. 2-QL faecond reading) K 224 r0- A3 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIT OF RANCHO COCA40RGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDPIG CHAPTER 8.18 TO THE RANCHO COCAN@.GA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REPOSE COLLECTION 7 F. vu- ANVnYYNm NNAIINCR I. ENTERTAINMENT OL LANCE nEPLLMC PERMIT PpOCIDO1P9 FO1 BUSINESSES DESTI7EG TO OFFER LIFE FRTN171INMENT WITHIN lag CITY OF RANCHO COCAMCHGA. ORDINANCR 30. 290 (second readUg) y. 237 AS ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 5 GY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COD% BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 5.12 ENTITLED "REGULATI(V 01 ENTENTAINMENT" 2. AMENDMENT To CiDIWANCE_Ra. 3D DELyunc 1FAOI zdM Fon 249 �. COLLECTICN OF Sb 701 FEES. s W Cicy Council Meeting -11- ORDINANCE NO. 303 (firev reading) i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIJIORHIA, AMENDING HECTIC] R OF ITS ORDINANCE NO. 30, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, PERTAINING TO THE FINANCING Oy INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES G. CITY X&ADNDt'N HT mxm= I, R&ICRO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FODIIDATIDH REPORT — Statue of the non- profit Coeeunity Foundation to be created for the benefit of cultural services and orb" cuoamity anbancenent projects. 2. $IT BUDGET MORSNROP DATES. 3, CULTURAL CENTER HEZM- N. COtINN2[i IOEIDEHI t�ar� �.1�•' a 1: F dW. 1. May 21, 1986 250 .a; 251 t' 264 265 .,- 3 0 P T N m P ^ P T A �~ A T � r \ I* C �p S 1 • � la \ f r '%r'� S(``a (t. I � y���E al.;ni `•j"�' .oat `M- •iri 'fir PO .IN ma ti .�1 �> Wu �e Ow Yr YO fd `y� Yd YM .t 00 till!!'. P✓ Y lJ^^1`. fP in Y Y ]i'._. w•t��1YN I y m` � nd"~ � �T '\.IT�Nfi � pAF "t �p "`� 'P>•y ' r , 'oi �• C> ' a or o• w u 99 �1eop &H NO •• 'f'} YO T l\11 CP.• WO -1•f' T O 2 qty \I• T bM pP AA ittreF Il\ Yf4_ .ir wt i! - •" 41 S - Zt' F o nyy� •\yn�- Nz w^ Js �`55 < SO f11 •<,.� Mi 'w YG mN NT N � M•w A ti �.•M�\lll---���NO} ii on o.Al• �y n T� zs T .> e> .' PAS• �. ,Fr. f'o o> zvr.' :z .Y m wp•afoi.• •}n> iP, icy•. rY w� RN ^T SS pC .Ail >e al G i i ;yvy YN >ITII n.. _ TT p}O rs% •is_ P OV •�Y pCp TN •+ p m �n Op %F•I -+ 9 O(• O� VO yy n0 yj yn •yj OyjO O� y± P� O ' I �•}. YO oa •00 00 -.P��� n0 ro �d da yd �r W }} a °m Nei Pm mr• ii r r: f •nC • rn ON •- Yd VP 'W•r. NY N PO d •M u� OP •� Ir`N }Y M Pm JN •MP P•' mV J VN SY • Of • nP •• OY CW Od OP 9a nn LO CO n0 On OP O SO OU 00' ' i I I i \• o:lli::'l_f_ 'i� i.i.5_e. •�!! °i. T }a.\\\.�.yt.y\�x- Tix: J P T N m P ^ P T A �~ A T � r \ I* C �p S 1 • � la \ f r .}t r m� P x is T ATE O a S s > a i O > 9 Y w ' rr NO YpN Wp �J O• Ry N �} Y JY yY1VN r W p1 < .I� .'•N YMf NO W J. OM VO °r = 'na sv sY }w'T^ O "� l� 1f`QQf•> RrJti.^ •••a .em S•-. *O of .+'-� : Mot nA oy � +vN r p^ yr n � •y._ an s I r°-i s <��N ''S„°. nm •�rfir• n ��R. ,i 5S gm �p•e•��}! G Ion n w D M i nC Y y GYO O .7i� CT f } rz jcI� „vCrM I11�'” f. so D> on 6Y• n A : EL.mw.I}..ir z �r ^.i ' ti � 7M�yr 1n4 ^ O 4 r aS OS .n9 > CF T `P (M � �r m l{R { . rr rr> y Y .4 N N p° CA . n .P }1 '• .iV X¢ e M ^ n• ei4Ni -2 s-1 � S O y� Yr• ;M TT •. r+i yya=r ��ir EM v or `D =a z 'a � zY MR i T 2 i ..°r/� z�' tT+./« 3J: .n• om Tn n S C T� Tom:` OR � �ni 1 � P I r2ir= n rr+ninr n w2i r2ir m j�•J S�S I^F• DT 2 2 9a :9 DT NI oo •ou ar o ^n enn 00 02 p° no pp °o �y °+. op v =e . r rr. or ow w mti ws mm se Yo o.Jr 'oJ Nr `Na cN N is ra •S .W i Yo �• ,Y _ rw r • Y ,p YM W , Y �^ YN •fi NY OVr JO YN PN 1••N JP i i I yJ,OJ } } }UW UO O JN n0 00 OO RO Np I JP OP ON JO MO JY Uo P On I 00 00 I .}t r m� P x is T ATE O a S s > a i O > 9 Y w z �i 6� a• o� na '; LY �� ec k oc ie• .D I, im e o ' i n N i n 1 i 1 a Is .c A J T n c . y 1 Ir 1 ID ^ IY ;y W .!•_:JkL't11i(.0 ei�lllxl ±ll _ 1 1 �_ _.__�• v Pf i/i nN .b NN }pLWW nP Vp YM N•p �. •p li•n.0 �s mi ^oc.Y.T O^ m %O 00 , n ;. • �w .°z..Y. w am .y cQ AI A.�>S �n nKS tm n o• :I�� °n�za 101=0 z zn n Ta 10 wo ar •f° T a ^3 '. n` ire cr °n Pp M, « nn x T r n n � 'tl o E re � i is m .Piss I n n �� S im Yo O n °a z V n •A i. n s� n oml ^ < � 1 n J` 1'• Prl i� g no 'n4 off• "n cC F.. sA: °T >T am ss. ��• J §m i^ c a �.• to sc m aY a°. Y «F .°•..c. r •c.. y" T .z. n� nn n% n nn n ^ yr I i a zN zz m i„•t z TT §� T ioa pa i� a Da ir I ° � I r w MM M r w W I I I I 4 n r n ry • n I n b rC �n M V VP m V bU n r V PW u j1 1 I -•O 00 ^O P��ON 00 ' nM 00 nW 00 I I I I I I � • I I I I I z �i 6� a• o� na '; LY �� ec k oc ie• .D I, im e o ' i n N i n 1 i 1 a Is .c A J T n c . y 1 Ir 1 ID ^ IY ;y W .!•_:JkL't11i(.0 ei�lllxl ±ll _ 1 1 �_ _.__�• v -I - ;7P,...... ,-- -- __tom• P Y f � Tr P i r z 0 .n T� z a e .a > . A O . A T ±w • 00 .may .G OM yN y0 O PO P Cm .VO f,0 O PO O e uP P NO ^ -rr 30 >n 19 9 TS" a 'S Z is Sr }� A4. N1 Y,n PS• Nn .. +a+^ _� ]�[1 nN s Hm �w i TM (,O TT 1P SY cc�.nT�i a Ao�_ i0 TL n- SMp yi i„ S Tr TS Ew .avJN f Ay ) Tr �j >} nP P PC (A� ac Ty Zu 'a MN =P vx PSf r O e wJ Tr 999 �..<.. az.'. y yR 73y j.. y Y y jn. AC C rN CTC f nD ]>O MY nw M� a.n �T O PT r.n TO 1% V VZ �r a T SPZ 'r S Iitiit �� .^nN .iN nO 9P S�N1� '. ayM TN T p _ F7i Ns .�.'. ay . °o m� .zi ,PO I rr or oo yo r- ua "us, I �o is wa �nv � NO Y� eY p�in�< as o� Oe an I YM �1P Pte. Ml e0 nP VN YO I 1 °o oa '•e�� °oo °0 00 jai orz+•a> or no^. o« no 1 n °o -I - ;7P,...... ,-- -- __tom• P Y f � Tr P i r z 0 .n T� z a e .a > . A O . A T lts i :: • F = Ow _ A4 uIN- VL i a� 5�� i2 2Y 'z� TY •moo iT NY oy wa .Stn .�+^ ,nn I =� =t i Fn' _ Y zoc •0 T♦ 1 �y Or If1 nr ,5.,3 YA,� +T (T `CK Srai C� Cxxi �!M 1 CCCCCC fY w !° Y, r S.xi.m .im r! a0 1 w > n TN,QN NJ{1 r ZO 'i.-ji � .Nif 'T S! S L'M �N Y �M Tr 1 m,Tn TY X n wN i IOi iR ,r n yN Ar • y N� i ^r � � O > wNi M ca O.O. u 22 o ^o � • o is fe i .° ia oY - Nr Noa iO .- o±a� r a ia, �p. is I '•� i 110e. r nls _ Nn ON ne YN rN Y M n�i a �P ^C N m iae nr - n° r oa, L.o Y I CC n0 ui og ouI n nr 00 OP o.+ yn 7�t i i i 1 I I I -_ _I 111.• [[11• �t�l j_ ���� ii i� 1 T • v n _ n� U n a r e c i T T n 1 T r •� j � ,mss °�� o« W o e.°i u" di raid,' 3 vy a o +.' '4„`Y n iii zo gas ,•�'� bS' nY ti, • a� s - c µw. r �- iii f;y ■;. r �` j� ` �� (t4��•a� . m Ala++•_ PZ �5��}. \•� , f 1aK�Z MJ MC Tw tezr, +� �` �• ��I T� TT AN � �p as as as 3f o0 on eo ..n ,nom �n ai bom be a° y I I N .O wr: !4 ae tiO <V ur yr ow -_ _I 111.• [[11• �t�l j_ ���� ii i� 1 T • v n _ n� U n a r e c i T T n 1 T r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager FRON: Jim Dart, Administrative Services Dir .tor /Deputy City Treasurer SUBJECT: Receive and File - City of Rancbo Cecemouga Investment 8cbedule Status Report as of May 14, 1986. ,.',. PURCHASE MATURITY INTEREST INSTITOTIUM DATE HATE AMOUNT MATE Bank of America 04 -24 -06 05 -09-86 500,000 06.075 Omni Bank 05 -16 -P5 05 -15-86 100,000 0.09500 Great Western S t L 04 -16 -86 05 -16 -85 800,000 0.06650 Crocker National Bank 04 -18-86 05 -19-86 500,000 0.06050 Soutbwest Savings 6 Loan 05 -20 -85 05 -20 -86 500,000 0.10000 First Interstate Beek 04 -21 -86 05 -21 -85 500,000 06.000 Bank of America 04 -24 -86 05 -23 -86 500,000 06.075 Brookside Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 05 -28-86 100,000 0.06625 Westwood Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 05 -28-86 100,000 0.08700 Equitable Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -8S 06 -02 -86 100,000 0.08850 7 Investment Status Report Page 2 PURCHASE MATURITY TNITITP=jol DATE DAIS Starling Savings 6 Loan 01 -29-95 06 -06 -86 Dell Savings 6 Loan 02 -03 -86 06 -06 -06 Foothill Independent lack 05-07 -86 06 -07 -86 North American Savings 02 -03 -86 06 -09-85 New American Savings 02 -03 -86 06 -09-86 Irvine City Savings 6 Loan 02 -10 -8S 06 -09-86 Fidelity Federal Savings 06 -17 -85 06 -17 -S6 Mitsui Manufacturer's 04 -21 -86 06 -20 -86 Charter 8avingo 6 Loan 02 -12 -86 �06 -20 -86 Gaited lack 01 -29-86 06 -23 -86 American Commerce National 02 -05 -86 06 -23 -M Executive Savings 6 Loan 02 -05-86 06 -23 -86 Imperial Savings 09 -23 -85 06 -30 -86 Imperial Savings 01 -06 -06 06 -30 -86 National Bank of Calif. 02 -10 -95 06 -30 -86 Vineyard National Dank 12 -27 -85 07 -02 -86 Foothill Independent Dank 01 -09-86 07 -02 -86 American Savings 6 Loan 06 -29-SA 07 -07 -86 Investment Savings 0 Loan 02 -12 -86 07 -07 -86 American Savings 6 Loan 07 -0 9-85 07 -09-86 lank of America 12 -30 -85 07 -15-86 Beverly Hills Savings 07 -15-85 07 -15-86 California Federal Savings 01 -13 -86 07 -16 -86 Commercial Center Bank 02 -12 -86 07 -18-86 s South Coast Shrift 6 Loan 02 -13 -86 07 -18-86 I N 100,000 100,000 365.099 100.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 INTEREST PAIR MARKET uTE yALOE 0.08500 0.08750 0.06000 0.00750 0.00250 0.08000 0.09250 06.400 0.08350 0.08750 0.08375 0.08250 0.08300 0.08000 0.08500 0.08000 0.07125 0.13200 0.08250 0.09375 0.07275 0.09400 0.01900 0.08250 0.08250 tyy_ Investment status Report Page 3 PORCRASE MATURITY IISTITUTION DITR DATR First Commercial Bank 02 -12 -86 07 -21 -86 Sierra Federal 8aviogs 02 -12 -86 07 -21 -86 Pioneer Savings 6 Loan 02 -13 -86 07 -21 -86 Bone Savings of America 04 -22 -86 07 -21 -86 Suavest Bank 04 -23 -86 07 -22 -86 Century Bank 02 -25-86 07 -28-86 Atlas Savings A Loan 01 -31 -86 07 -30 -86 Foothill Independent Bank 01 -13 -86 08-16 -86 Inland Savings 6 Loan 02 -05-86 08-12-86 Presidia $"Lags 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 08-11 -86 Plata Savicgs 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 08-11 -86 Bank of America 01 -14 -86 08-20 -86 Coast Sniogs 6 Loan 04 -23 -86 08-21 -86 Central Savings 02 -05-86 08 -22 -86 Columbus Savinge 02 -05-86 08 -22 -85 Dal Aso Savings 02 -10 -85 08-25 -86 Inmtingtco Savings A Loan 02 -30 -86 08-25 -86 Downey Savings 02 -25-96 08-25 -86 Glendale Federal 01 -27 -66 08-25 -86 Guardian Savings 02 -19-86 09 -05 -86 First Security Savings Bank 02 -19-86 09-05 -86 Foothill Independent Bank 03 -20 -86 09 -1S -86 Household Bank 02 -21 -86 09 -19 -86 Valley Federal Savings 02 -24 -86 09 -22 -86 Bears Savings Bank 03 -22 -35 09 -26 -86 9 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100.000 400,000 100,000 300.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 600,000 100,000 100.00,, 100.000 749,532 100,000 500,000 100,000 INTEREST FAIR MARES •JAn vALDa 0.08500 0.08300 0.08550 06.400 06.500 0.08375 0.09375 0.07125 0.08500 0.08700 0.08500 0.07575 07.000 0.07850 0.08750 0.08375 0.08750 0.07900 0.08200 0.08350 0.08500 Iresvury Billel 0.08650 0.0 8000 0.10700 n n ^n I n n I n ::s- Investment Status Report Page 4 PORCRASI NATURITf INSTITUT101 01X1 I DATR Centennial Savings 6 Loan 02 -25-86 10 -03 -86 laplre National Dank 02 -25-86 10 -03 -88 Farmers Savings 02 -25 -86 10 -06 -86 Western Financial Savings 02 -26 -86 10 -06 -86 lank of Beverly gills 04 -16 -86 10 -14 -86 Signal Savings 01 -10 -86 10 -16 -86 Financial Savings 6 Loan 02 -19-86 10 -17 -86 Palm Springs Savings Bank 04 -22 -86 30 -20 -86 Banta Paula Savings 6 Loan 04 -22 -86 -20 -86 �10 Long Beaco Savings 6 Loan 04 -21 -86 10 -20 -d6 Western Empire Savings 02 -25-86 10 -20 -86 La Contra Savings Saul• 04 -21 -86 10 -20 -86 Chino Valley Bank 04 -22 -86 10 -20 -86 lewport Balboa Savings 03 -30 -86 10 -20 -86 lack of Whittier 03 -04 -86 10 -21 -86 Pacific Savings Bank 10 -24 -85 10 -24 -86 Founders Saviog• 6 Loan 02 -27 -86 1C -27 -86 Pacific Savings Back 0-06 -86 30 -31 -86 Century thrift 03 -06 -86 11 -07 -86 Sao Clcmente Savings 6 Loan 03 -07 -86 11 -07 -86 Progressive Savings 03 -07 -86 11 -10 -86 Bank of Newport 03 -14 -86 I1 -14 -86 Gibraltar Savings 6 Loan 03 -17 -86 11 -17 -86 Pamous First Federal 03 -11 -86 11 -19-BS First Federal Savings Bank 03 -03 -86 11 -2646 100.000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100.000 300..'03 100.000 100.000 99.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 91,224 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 500.000 100.000 100,000 IDiSWEST PAIR MARKET LASE yALUJ 0.05750 0.08500 0.08875 0.08550 0.07500 0.08750 0.08500 07.000 07.250 07.375 0.08625 07.500 06.550 0.08250 0.08300 0.09620 0.08500 0.08400 0.09000 0.08000 0.08250 0.08000 0.07500 0.08250 0.08600 T� Investment Status Report Page S PORCRASE NATURIST n(TITUTION 0 ►TL 2A7Y Commerce Savings 03 -11 -86 11 -26 -85 American Savings 11 -04-83 12 -04 -86 United Nisrabi Bank 03 -19-86 12 -05-86 California Federal 03 -19-36 12 -13-86 Ramona Savings 6 Loan 03 -18 -86 12 -13-86 Arrovbvad Pacific Savioga 03 -11 -86 12 -31 -Se Bank of America 03 -19-86 01 -02 -87 Security Federal Savings 02 -28-86 01 -26 -87 1larit Savings Bank 03 -03 -86 01-27-87 Royal Oak Savings 6 Loan 03 -03 -86 01 -27 -87 Upland National Bank 01 -27 -86 01 -27 -87 3quitec 01 -27 -86 01 -27 -87 Capital Bank 01 -29-86 01 -29-87 Country Savings Back 01 -31 -86 02 -02 -87 So. Calif. Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -86 02 -02 -87 Bel -Air Savings 6 Loan 02 -04 -86 02 -04 -87 Westport Savings Bank 02 -03 -86 02 -05-7 Family Savings 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 02 -06 -87 Rancho Bank 02 -13 -86 02 -13 -87 Golden Pacific Savings 02 -14 -86 02 -17 -87 Cold River Savings 6 Loan 02 -14 -86 02 -18-87 Secure Savings 6 Loan 02 -19 -86 02 -19-87 Gibraltar Savings 6 Loan 02 -I4 -85 02 -20 -87 6B oath Bay Savings 6 Loan 02 -23-86 02 -23-87 s. Nt. Whitney Savings i Loan 02 -23-86 02 -23-87 100,000 100.000 100,000 400.000 160.000 100,000 300.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 IDSEREST PAIR MARKET YA7E yALOE -- 0.08000 0.09000 0.07300 0.07430 0.08623 0.08230 0.06873 0.08300 0.08300 0.08373 0.08300 0.08800 0.09230 0.09300 0.09150 0.09250 0.08750 0.08750 19000 0.08730 0.08750 0.09000 0.10250 0.08750 0.08750 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 2r__ Investment Status laport Page 6 PURCSASU MATURITI INBTITDTYCN DA2F 12ITS Guaranty Savings & Loan 02 -25-86 02 -25-87 Century City Savings 6 Loan 02 -26 -86 02 -26 -87 Mercantile Bank 02 -28-86 03 -02 -81 First Savings 6 Loan 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 Soutkwast Bank 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 University Savings 03 -03 -86 03 -04 -87 Brentwood savings i Loan 03 -04 -66 03 -04 -87 Commercial Pacific Savings 03 -04-56 03 -04 -97 Daiou Federal Savings 03 -04 -86 _ O 04 -87 La Jolla Village Bank 03 -04 -86 03 -04 -87 Manhattan Bank Saviago 03 -05 -86 03 -05-87 Guardian Federal Savings 03 -05 -86 03 -05-87 Western Family Bank 03 -06 -86 03 -06 -87 Wastco Savings Bank 03 -11 -86 03 -I1 -87 Alvarado Bank 03 -12 -86 03 -1247 Valley National Bank 03 -12 -86 03 -12 -87 Bank of America 03 -13 -86 03 -13 -87 Sun Savings 6 Loan 03 -18 -&i 03 -18-87 San Dlequitc National Bank 03 -19 -86 03 -1847 California Security Bank 03 -21 -86 03 -23 -87 WiliLire Center Bank 03 -24 -86 03 -24 -87 Runtiogton National Bank 03 -25-86 03 -25 -87 Atlantic Financial Savings 03 -25-86 03 -25 -87 Y.ereLsat's Bank 03 -25-56 03 -25-87 Consolidated Savings 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 AD- 100,000 100.000 100.000 1:0.000 5011.000 100,000 100,0000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 lu0,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 INTEREST PAIR MARKET 417E VALOR 0.08700 0.08750 0.08500 0.09000 0.07850 0.08750 0.08750 0.08625 0.08500 0.08500 0.09750 0.08500 0.08375 0.08750 0.08250 0.08100 0.07125 0.08750 0.08250 0.08250 0.08125 0.08250 0.08375 0.08250 0.08250 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100,000 Iuvestment Status Report Tags 7 MAMUM314, PUICSASE MAlUEITT INTEREST PAIR MABEBY DATE —k47R ANOUI1• Lib TLLOE Lincoln American 8avlogs 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100,000 0.08150 City Thrift E Loan 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100,000 0.08250 Saratoga Savings d Loan 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100.000 0.08250 United American Bank 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100,000 0.08000 100,000 Golden Pacific Bank 04 -03 -86 04 -03 -87 100,000 0.08000 Butterfield S A L 04 -22 -86 04 -22 -87 99,000 08.000 Deauville Savicgs Bank 04 -22 -85 04 -27 -87 100,000 07.875 Mutual 6 A L ASSOC. 04 -24-86 04 -23 -87 100,000 07.000 Syr Yarcnry Savins 4 Loan 04 -24 -86 04 -24,87 100,000 07.250 Xalags Savings 6 Loan 04 -24 -86 04 -24-87 100,000 07.373 Adoba Savings 6 Loan 04 -24 -85 04 -24-87 100,000 07.900 Iavrator's Thrift 6 Loan 04 -24 -86 04 -24-87 100,000 08.100 San Clemente Savings 6 Loea 04 -28-86 04 -28-87 100,000 07.380 Capital Bank of Calif. 04 -28-86 04 -28-67 100,000 07.250 Golden Colo Savings 6 Loan 04 -29 -b6 04 -29-87 100,000 07.500 Wilshire Savings 6 Loan 05-09 -86 05 -11 -86 100.000 0.0775 Xauila Bank of Calif. 05 -12 -86 05 -12 -S7 100.000 0.07500 Marty Savings 6 Loan 02 -13 -8b 09 -14 -87 !00,000 0.09250 Ponninsula Savings 03 -20 -86 09 -16 -87 100,0011 0.09000 100.030 Torrance Savings 03 -20 -86 09 -16 -87 100,000 0.08500 100,000 Eastern Savings 6 Loan 01 -28-86 01 -28-88 100,000 0.09750 100,000 `Cal America 8aviuSa 01 -31 -86 02 -01 -88 100.000 0.09600 100,000 American Vast Bank 03 -05-86 03 -05-88 100,000 0.08750 100,000 �2gternational Savings Banc 03 -05-86 03 -07 -98 100.000 0.08750 /3 Investment Statue Report Page 8 nmm=jgl IORCUSE DATE MATURITY DATE AMWIT INTEREST ILE PAIR 33AMIT - pALUE Ridden valley National Bank 03 -05-86 03 -47 -88 100 000 0.08750 100,000 Pan Aaerican Savings Bank 03 -05 -86 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Lincoln Savings A Loan 03 -06 -65 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.08800 100,000 Los Angeles Federal Savings 03 -I1 -86 03 -10-88 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Rawilton Savings Bank 03 -26 -86 03 -28-88 100,000 0.08500 100,000 Universal Savings Bank 03 -27 -86 03 -28-88 100,000 0.08500 100,000 Dean Witter Reynolds 04 -IS-85 05 -15-88 97,191 Treasury Billet 112,875 Sunrise Back 03 -14 -86 09 -14-88 100,000 0.08750 100,0[0 Gateway Savings A Loan 03 -25-86 '56-25-88 100,000 0.08375 130,000 Great Pacific Savings 02 -03 -86 02 -03 -89 100,000 0.09750 100,000 Desert Coaeunity Bank 02 -13 -86 02 -13 -89 100,000 0.09875 100,000 National Back of Catalina 02 -27 -86 02 -27 -80 100,000 0.09500 100400 North Coast Savings 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -89 100,000 0.09230 100,000 Continental savings 03 -05-86 C3 -07 -89 100,000 0.09250 100,000 Independence Seviugs 03 -05-66 03 -07 -59 300,001` 0.09150 100,000 Heritage Oaks Bank 03 -11 -86 03 -10 -89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Cantsido Savings A Loan 03 -11 -86 03 -10 -89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Boaestate Savings 6 Loan 03 -I1 -86 05 -10 -89 100,000 0.09000 103,000 Suisun valley Bank 03 -12 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09000 Coast Bank 03 -13 -86 03 -13 -89 700,000 0.09050 100,000 Regency Bank 03 -14 -85 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Pacific Business Beck 03 -34 -86 03.13 -89 100,000 0.08750 100.070 Sacrameoto First National 03 -14 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09250 100,000 Envato National Bank 03 -19-86 03 -15-89 100,000 0.09500 Back of Dal Mar 03 -17 -86 03 -16 -89 1001000 0.08750 100,000 0 . I - nn ;.I n.n ]C - .. Investment status Report Page 9 115- PURCeASB -MATURITY 131TIREST FAIR MAR*9T 111nmML e1Ti --DA7(IL- AMOUNT LTR VALOR Say Area Rank C3 -17 -86 03 -16 -89 100,000 0.09000 10^,000 First American eau. 03 -18-86 03 -17 -89 100,000 0.08750 100,000 City Coeaerce bank 03 -21 -86 03 -20 -89 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Rank of Commerce 03 -25-86 03 -23-89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Constitution savings C3 -25-86 03 -28-89 99,000 0.09250 100,000 Pacific Coast Savings 03 -31 -85 03 -30 -89 100,000 0.09-250 100,000 Valley Coyercial Bank 03 -12 -86 09-08 -89 100,000 0.09250 100,000 Staukdals Savings A Loan 03 -19-89 09 -15-89 100,000 O.U9250 100,000 mp' Mission Valley bank 03 -26 -86 09 -22 -89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Lincoln Savings A Loan 02 -13 -85 02 -13 -90 100.000 0.11125 100,000 CoverumaLt Nat'l Mortgage 04 -.6 -84 01-I5 -2011 729,784 0.13000 *3 853,593 Local Agency Invest Fond 12 -04 -83 As Needed 2.250.000 0.08620 Local Agency Invest Fund 12 -20 -85 As Needed 2.750.000 0.08620 Sub Total, 31.429,820 115- r u- lavestmout Status !sport ?age 10 1mdT1TUM 2D-85 Crest Western Savings ALL Croat Westorn Savings Great Western savings As of 04 -07 -86 ■ ?ORCRASS MATURITY 1sTIMT FAIR XMIT nAra Dart AHM aayg vu0s 04 -21 -86 05 -21 -86 1,257.444 0.06800 Hub Total: 7,257,444 05 -02 -86 06 -02 -86 4,100,000 0.06750 02 -25-86 07 -25-86 100 -000 0.08375 Sub Total: 4,200,000 Craud Totals 42,887,264 �Y,- I&- e1 Treasury Hills are purchased at a price below their maturity value. They are quoted and traded on the bads of yield to maturity. The approximate interest earned on this six mouth investment will be 825.468.00. s2 The approximate interest earned 00 t:is investment will be 434.000.00. s3 Securities vbich are backed by pools of government insured or guaranteed mortgages. Note 4: All investments are Certificates of Deposit unless otherwise noted above. Pei - ;i I eulH roe saucy a Wray // O q m 1. Claims for death, iajary to person or to J �/ than 100 days after the OCCLrreace � Wag. Co~aa. ogee. p911l2). met M pled a afar 2. Claims !or demapa to coal property mat be filed -a later tbaa 1 year thl oecorrenee (Car. Cede, Bee. 911.2). Tel CITT Or nom COCAIb A .9SAN ELIZABETH LAWSON 7557 Sunstone St. 91701 980 -5097 30 !tams of Claimant — M roan Alta Loma, Ca. Zip ph00e Ate LAN OFFICPS OF SHELDON G. {lELLINS, 250 West First St., S. 312, Claremont; Add.-log to which Claimaat wishes notices sent. Ca 1 ornla wpl• did drat* or injury a.:.urt Sunday, April 13, 1986 UM did "ti bt itj iii deestt Baseline i Vineyard, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. IM and Hader wba! circumstances did drag or injury senor? Claimant was riding cle on the sidewalk w :inn eha ran into a construction fance that was r -- !•a�n+na n•er rh sidewalk. The faice was hidden From view because of. —mdutetl= -dntil it was too close to avoid.' Olt partieulse action by the City, or its nplgns, Caused the alleged damate or injury? (Include once of employees, if lnora). The fence borders a City Project and the City has the responsibility of keeping the fenco up and out of the roadway. what say do pn+ claim? Include the estimated #mount of auy proipaetive lose, insofar at t may be moon at the time of the preetntation of this claim, together with the basis of eoaputatios of the amount claimed. (A.ttacb estimates or bills, it possible). GENERAL DAMAGES FOR CLALMA:7T -- ' 250,000.00 GENERAL DAMAGES FOR MINOR DAUGHTER ' 25,000.00 MEDICAL BILLS PLUS FUTURE MEDICAL COSTS �Zj'; QQjT"J(J tESTT rncg nv Unknown Total Amount Claimed? p 300.000.00 (EST) RAW and addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitala: Dr. Schechter, 1175 E. Arrow Highway, Suite M., Upland 91786 Dr. Edward Langlois, chiropractor, 253 W. Orange Grove, Pomon. Ca. Marshall Salkin, M.D., 329 West Second St., Claremont, Ca. 91711 _Yav 2. 1986 < Xawyhs(� Date Signature of Claimant 17 • 111 LAW OFFICES OF SOLOMON i McRIBBIN 117 West 4th Street, 2nd Floor 2 Santa Ana, California 92701 Telephone: (714) 972 -8561 Attorneys for Claimants 6 7 8 In the Matter of the Claims of: 9 BRIAN J. LESSARD and LISA LESSARD, 11 Claimants, ) va. ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO I and DOES 1 to 50, Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) $6 - a5 s -a/ -86 TORT CLAIM TO GOVERNNENTAL ENTITIES UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE 5910 T„ 1. Claimants: BRIAN J. LESSARD and LISA LESSARD. 2. 'ddresa of Claimanta: 10441 Pepper Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. Date of Injury: March 6, 1986, at approximately 10:00 A.H. 21 4. Place of Injury: Intersection of Baseline and 22 Spruce, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, 29 California. 24 S. Facts: This Claim arises out of an automobile acci- 95 dent which is memoralized in the traffic collision recort of the 28 Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, Report No. 1379402 -11. In a 27 construction zone along the south aide of eastbound Baseline, at 28 the T- intersection with Spruce, there were trucks blacking the 0 i 1 right hand lane and obstructing the view of all drivers near the 2 intersection. This created an unsafe condition for all concerhtd. $ This intersection was at all times relevant to this claim a pub - 4 lie one and controlled by the two governmental entitles named 5 heroin. 6 6. Faults Both the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and the 7 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO are under a mandatory duty to remedy the $ dangerous condition of public property that they had knowledge of. 9 Also, they are under a mandatory duty to supervise construction 10 upon their streets. I£ their independent contractors created the 11 hazardous condition, they are liable under the same laws as an or- 12 dinary person. Y'F 1$ A hazardous condition existed at the above 14 described intersection and the construction ha-1 been on -going for 15 a long period of time. The inability to see oncoming traffic be- 16l1 cause of th, dump trucks allegedly double- parked was the cause of 1711the accident. The names of tha construction companies and 10 their employees are unknown to Claimants at this time. 20 7. Inv : Claimant, BRIAN J. LESSARD, has sustained 21 bodily injuries. In addition to medical expenses and wage loss, 22 Claimant is also making a claim for general damages in the amount of $50,000.00. Claimant, LISA LESSARD, was the owner of 25 the 1977 2 -door Ford which Claimant, BRIAN J. LESSARD, was opsrat 26 ing at the time of the incident. Claimant has sustained substan- __ 27 tial property damage and loss of use of said vehicle, and she wil 281 amend this Claim to insert said amounts as soon as the sums have -2- 19 0 • been ascertained. IT IS HEREBY nEQDESTED that your Notices concerning Claim be sent to: LAW OFFICES OF SOLOMON 6 McAIBBIN, 117 this California 42701. - West 4th Street, 2nd Floor, Santa Ana, DATED: May 2, 1986' LAW OPFIC O IA14ON 6 Mc %IHBIN By: / A. o n, c ar imants. Attorneys for W2 :1 ^� -3- _ _ dJ &a. S-6 -r( pORNS:0704.01:CIAIN FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY //. .30 4en CLUM TOR DANAGR OR IfinT CL 6z' ,;k C/ 15'.W-96 1. Claim for death, injury to person, or to personal prop rty =at be filed o later than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claim for damges to real property vast be filed no later than 1 year the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 9)1.2). TO: CITY OF RARC20 COUNOWL DWI'( /,-? L-% i 7583 R/ULRn /e1 36 920 13911 .27 Noses of Claimeut Address Zip Phone Age Address to vhich Cl iwgnt wishes noti ces sent. WREN did damage or injury occur? L,"1/2 S /Rr NmUt did damage or injury occur? 75-23 /l /'P.b4L/ SOY and under vbat circumstances did damage or injury occur? 77 r ir. nr/ Ca... - VMAY particular action by the City, or its employees, "used the alleged damage or injuryt (Include names of mployees, if inova). Hat a= do you claim? Include the estimatad amount of any prospective loss, insofar so it my be )now at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed. (Attach estimates or bills, if possible). (�� e / d 9 7 L n.. ._a /Qecv n /Jinn b5- /— Total Yount Claird: $ is'A�! RAW and addresses of vitoesses, doctors, and hospitals: S R Date / b goatnT* of Claimtar CW i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 uww 12a Ank"A Jaffee x„ w W.. erou . w.mu. e.0 917410 (1143 see. (e18).K13[e •..a.,. V . Claimant JOEY RAY ALICE, a minor, by ) and through his Guardian Ad 1 Litem, JACK D. ALICE ) 1 Claimants, ) VS. ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; ) METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT; 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL) DISTRICT; COUNTY OF SAN 1 BERNARDINO; SAN BERN W IND ) COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL - DISTRICT; 1 CITY OF UPLAND; CUCAMONGA WATER 1 DISTRICT, CITY OF RANCHO COCA- 1 MONGA . 1 Defendants. ) C seeicw roi(ruuo>r�aan 44 S- $-8G 3o air, CL & - as a& CLAIM FOR DAMAGES (Govt. Code 910) S2 TO THE DEFENDANTS AND EACH OF THEM: You are hereby notified that JOEY RAY ALICE, a minor by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, whose address is 1708 Granite Avenue, Ontario, California, 91762, claims losses arising out of personal injury, in the sum of $500,000.00 computed as �f the date of this claim. This claim is based on damages sustained by said claimant on or about January 26, 1986, by reason of the following facts: Joey Ray Alice, while riding on an All Terrain Cycle along a dirt road, fell into an unmarked and unguarded excavation which extended across said road. The location of the incident is the large area in the City of Upland extending South and East from the intersection of Campus and 19th Street. The location has no known adresse and sald_locatiioon1is unreasonably dangerous. "1 1. I As a direct and proximate result of the incident and your 2 negligent supervisiofi and maintenance of the site the claimant. - 3 has and will continue to incur medical expenses as well as 4 physical and emotional injury. 5 All notices and communications with regard to this claim 6 should be sent to the Claimant in care of his attorney, LAW 7 OFFICES OF ARTHUR J. JAFFEE, 301 West Mission Blvd., Pomona, e California 91766. 9 10 DATED: March 26, 1986 LAW OFFICES OF ARTHUR J. JAFFEE 11 12 BY•C� S CHRISTIAN AMENDT :# 13 Attorney for the Claimant `i II L 14 i 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 a 25 ,. 26 iy lfi 27 y _ 28 ri5'", -- -2- r'4; J 9 V 1 2 3 4 B 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IYFSIFICATtom —u4 20153 C C P,) 3717E of CALUORN[A, COUNTY OF to V eu rl.W wki=Le u Wrerdtyi 1 hn,nd ar ud wr ar p u a.nrl: rd i wdj, as as run b t At n2 rwr w-&44 u "W u b AkA ur arede rt w *pm of Wrrmube a hurl. ud m m'" Hann 1 hues b m M ace. 1 de, Lire, udu penal el Wrlr rrlet ,M Le el ,pr Sun e/ CJUrna (Lade laepfep b "u ud Here" Eupud ae_— GWurte ldurl 1pbttl ,.* lSlvw ) T..x PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (10131.201U CC P,) STATE OF CAUFORMA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES iuu Tnn W wt a pun n at d" ret(ttd I dM 01 ar mup alrrmld; 1 m erer th rpr rl "p r"be, ml haw, eddtw b: 301 West Mission Blvd., Pomona, CA 91766 0e May 06 1966 1p,ndtLmite CLAIM FOR DAMAGES (Govt. Code 910) ti, int rested arties 0 as r"br, i2 pbd s a :rrr app nl N a redact uubW wl. puvde anw / ) pr H U" Smt" wdl .+. POmUnA CA - rddnud a lrurw: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: City Clerk, Debbie Adams 9320 Baseline Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7 drebre, ud" Wu42 N Wrur2 wire ar Lin rl ,ir )we el CoW<nae as ar /utptep 6 uu d tuna Aaepued r May 6 1986 Pomona n Crlflrnb Jeannie Benart v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Hay 21, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: 1985/86 Traffic Signal Program - Controller Purchase Four suppliers submltteQLb)ds at the City's request, ranging from $35.510 + tax to $59,836 + tax, r the five controller assemblies needed for =-r this year's signal program. A summary of the blds received Is as follows: Traconex Inc. $35,509.50 Multisonics Corp. $36,310.00 Computer Service Co. $54,805.00 Econolite Control Products $59,836.25 The low bid, by Traconex, nc., is In full compliance with the specifications. Staff recommends approval to pt..-chase of the five traffic controllers from Traconex. Inc. for a total cost of $37,641, including tax. Respectfully submit d, LBH:PAR :bc 1 .N� ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAINIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P. 0. Box 670 Upland, Ca 91786 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee BoA-' Tr. 12316, 12317, 12364, (Medians, parkways, Interior Planting d Local Street Trees) $9,000.00 Tr. 12315 -1, 12317 -1, 12364 -1 (Medians, Parkway 6 Trails) $11,600.00 Tr. 12364 -1 Street Improvement and Landscaping) $17.470.00 Tr. 12316 -1 Street Improvement and Landscaping) $36,000.00 Tr. 12317 -1 Street Improvement and Medians) $18,400.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bands Tr. 12316, 12317, 12364 (Medians, Parkways, Interior Planting d Local Street Trees $90,000.00 Tr. 12316 -1, 17317 -1, 12364 -1 (Medians and Trails) $116,000.00 Tr. 12364 -1 (Street Improvement and Landscaping) $174,700.00 Tr. 12316 -1 (Street Improvement and Landscaping) $360,000.00 Tr. 12317 -1 (Street Improvement and Medians) $159,500.00 The required improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council accept the above referenced one year Maintenance Guarantee Bards, authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bon.3 and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. continued... g ya, i a m City Council Staff Report Re: Bond Release May 21, 1986 Page 2 Tracts 11173 and 11173 -1 - located at the Southeast corner of 19th Street and ,rchibald Avenue DEVELOPER: M. J. Brock and Sons 1698 Greenbriar Lane, Suite 221 Brea, California 92621 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Tr. 11173) $15,000 Maintenance Guarantee Dond (Tr. 11173 -1) $22,507 The one year maintenance period has passed and the improvements are in an acceptable condition. It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tracts 11173 and 11173 -1. Res "fully bm�,ed LBH: D7 Ole c m me� Cn-f OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, I986 rjL-- 10: Mayor and Members of the City C ncil FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Joe Tor:ez, Community Code Representative SUBJECT: RELEASE OF T, O, p, 80ND5 FOR TRACT 12090 - USA PROPERTIES Work for the following tract(s) has been completed and the Guarantee Braids are hereby authorized by the Planning Department for release. OF ArchiDeld 6 Peron Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions regarding this bond release, please call. JT /Jr CC: Jim Hart, Adminstrative Services Director a d SWAN USA,F,,A "os : ana. :. April 29, 1986 Mr Joe Torroz City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 RE: Tract 12090 Dear Mr. Torrez: This letter is to request a refund of the $2,500 deposit paid by USA on 5/26/83, your receipt 020103, for guarantee of re- moving our sales office. The trailer used as the sales office has bean removed and all fencing has been replaced. Addition- ally, all models have been sold. Copies of our check and your receipt are enclosed. Please note that our office has moved; the refund should be mailed to the Diamond Bar address. Very truly yours, USA PR,,O;;PEER�RTIyyE��S�� FUND, INC. i'C1122CJ-r�'oG�L Patti Paterson Director of Marketing SerrSeea —RECEIVED — cnYorF1kKWcuuraaa4 ILANNIMO DM331M APR 301986 PP /jk AM PM 7; 619 ;101 ll ;12111213141516 e Enclosure ! A%6119FALb'k s% AJ Devalopmw mvwom 706 N. Diemaad Bar BNd., Owmm d Bat Cahbmia 91765 (714) 595.0899 HWqua4enr 1801 WdW1Q Bm*rard. Suite A P.Q Bar 2165, Santa Manta, Cahbma W406 (213) 453.3311 Sy c A _ I //n r. �• t rt •• r � � lff �� l LnE•�ry rLk..r p +eKt� A tJ•'y"' kL� "'+r , I "' .. r • •a .. • „ Rftalpl Nwnbw TO-- ✓ •�,J�a OAO s 20103 ,'"�.^ 2 ..~ J — — • --•-- - •• CUSTOMER CITY OF ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA rOSTOFFlCENOX s MNCHO CUCAYONOA, CALIFORNIA „?.0 .' ••_ ♦r.M• Tt"M• .4ML wv L 11.1 R� � 'o • ..,.., r/� t�$ A _ I //n r. �• t rt •• r � � lff �� l LnE•�ry rLk..r p +eKt� A tJ•'y"' kL� "'+r , I "' .. r • •a .. • „ Rftalpl Nwnbw TO-- ✓ •�,J�a OAO s 20103 ,'"�.^ 2 vU05723�' 1:,.2 2000 24 71:0610 02756W I c ..iL r..opmm mo. Lm i -- - - - 061III.°a,1,.GJ r, - - — - - -- - -- mw 5/40/83 Refundable cash deposit for sales I $2,500. 1515 -101 office - Tract 12090 4r1Mi•F1 P� 1, •i4. WV .\ '1Y rt .RW •II M«kr� was , .,.. -•t ap rW+' �:If9,r •aa.$ R ' c,' �'. +y, :�,w'. 31 •- z, t ro. ".._:, tom. -:o. Lm. . : PAY r TO .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5/24/83 s 2,500.00 ouora or vU05723�' 1:,.2 2000 24 71:0610 02756W I c ..iL r..opmm mo. Lm i -- - - - 061III.°a,1,.GJ r, - - — - - -- - -- mw 5/40/83 Refundable cash deposit for sales I $2,500. 1515 -101 office - Tract 12090 4r1Mi•F1 P� 1, •i4. WV .\ '1Y rt .RW •II M«kr� was , .,.. -•t ap rW+' �:If9,r •aa.$ R ' c,' �'. +y, :�,w'. 31 a: r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 1986 v4 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Apprcval of Lien Agreement between the Foothill Communities Church of Nazarene and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9944 Highland Avenue The attached subject agreement between the City and the Foothill Comwnities Church of Nazarene provides for frontage improvements which includes curbs, gutters Vdewalk and drive approaches in return for a 10 -year lien on the Church's property fronting Highland Avenue. Said improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Capital Imprcvement Project for the reconstruction of Highland Avenue from the Alta Loma Creek Channel to 600 feet East. RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Lien Agreement between the Foothill Communities Church of Nazarene and the City of Rancho -amonpa in an amount not to exceed $56,263.00. Respectfully sl ittt %�� !% tyd, _ LBH: :b Attachments N LIEN AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 1986 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY•) and Foothill Communities Church of Nazarene ( hereinatter collectively referred to as "OWNER") for the installarion of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along a portion of Highland Avenue In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitiis (i) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Highland Avenue from the Alta Loma Creek Channel to 600 feet East (the "Highland Avenue Project" hereinafter in this Agreement). (11) OWNER awns that 2e{ain real property, identified as San Bernardino a- County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 055 -49, which is located on Highland Avenue, which property Is withiin the limits of the Highland Avenue Project. (iii) C.TY is willing to Include the street frontage improvements along OWNER's property located on Highland Avenue (the Nazarene Church Portion hereinafter) within the Highland Avenue Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW. THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows: 1. CITY shall include the Nazarene Church Portion as a part of the construction of the Highland Avenue project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be installed to accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. The limits of said construction are more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. 2. OWNER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, CITY's actual costs Incurred in constructing the Nazarene Church Portion. The parties hereto agree that the costs of said construction shall not exceed $56.263.00. The actual amount to be fixed upon receipt of final construction billing for those improvements shown to the Estimate of Construction attached hereto and identified as Exhibit "C'. 3. Upon completion of the Highland Avenue Project, and the Nazarene Church Portion thereof, CITY shall cause a Notice of Completion to be prepared -1- 33 - = and presented to OWNER. Upon presentation of said Notice of Completion. OWNER agrees to pay the full principal amount for the Nazarene Church Portion not to exceed $56,263.00 plus 9% per annum simple interest to accrue upon the unpaid balance. For accounting purposes interest accrual shalt begin 30 days after Notice of completion. Owner shall Pay said amount at minimum in ten (10) installments of $5.627 plus interest or the remaining balance of annual principal and accrued interest to be due and pay able on or before the 31st day of December each calendar year coauencing with the year 1906. In the event OWNER fails to make timely payment. or in the event of sale of the property. the entirety of any amount remaining and accrued interest thereon shall become due and payable to CITY. No pent shall be made to red at vi tue of accelerated payment by owner. Payments Cucamonga City Hall, Attention: Administrative Services Director, or at such other address or person as the CITY may designate writing. OWNER'S property (San 4. CITY shall have ae��+�trs hereby give Bernardino County Assesofis ParcelNo. 201- 055 -49)to secure the full t� performance by OWNER of OWNER'S payment obligations set forth in paragraph 3, above. Such property is more fully described as' 'Foothill Frostless Fruit Co. Subdivision No. 2, Lot 15 and Southerly E2 feet obligations Lot s pecte d event the that OWNER fails to timely fulfill alternatively, enforce and foreclose the lien paragraph 3, above, CITY may, provided fer or sue OWNER on OWNER'S personal obligations hereunder all of which payment obligations shall be considered personal regardless of whether or not OWNER may have or shall have transferred all or any of OWNER's interets in said property, whether by operation of law or otherwise. S. CITY'S waiver of any breach by OWNER with respect to any payment obligation set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any other such breach. 6. OWNER ogrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, off cers, agents, employees and contractors such rights of and/or tem eperary entry construction ersements as are deemed necessary by CITY'S City cause the completion of the Nazarene Church Portion. 7. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. -2- ■ R. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or Provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined ;by the court to he reasonable. 9. This Agreement is binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the coi.'ext requires or admits. 10. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the sublet, matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any mouification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signedby all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the r fez hereto have executed h1 r nent_on.Lhe. day and year first above wrt omnucu 11n R vun rfu[ ,0. Mounv yv ft. tl aw CITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: e rey ng, yor ATTEST: Bever y . ru t—h e7 et, ty-We —rt PROPERTY O"ER Foothill Communities a urch of Nazarene Rev. Richard Stallings Gene Michael$ APPROVED AS TO FORM: 37 City Atto rney 'y'ry rG 1 T , rq lj W�yb N - \i Cr • V `' • 2 v � A' 1 m)l Ia)q I M) • �r> O ,S 4q7 ev M,v. •H � Y711.t1 s.a n••r 1 � 1 h ' v— Sai3F1T— b ; s — A I IM1O rII q IIMI n• 73NNVH9 esr�1'J .J WV07 VO k , �•.�,:jy 1 ' --7;9_ ■ R A�• v un cm CXRI2,I7 M4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FREUNII NARY COST ESTMATE FCMIAIU_ COMMUNMES CIiURCLI OF NAZAREN•" a;7 ZF Date: 21,enIg, eyt UNIT ELWA i i• I� W1 RESOLUTION NO. $�— 14�- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THE FOOTHILL COMMUNITIES CHURCH OF NAZARENE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction of frontage Improvements in conjunction with the Highland Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approach and pavement located at 9944 Highland Avenue, to be made part of the Highland Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, the Foothill Communities Church of Nazarene has submitted a Lien Agreement as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, SIT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of��_ Rancho Cucamonga, Californ ; does accept said Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same In the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. B B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c� STAFF REPORT el DATE: May 21, 1986 --- TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd S. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF FEE IN LIEU OF UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Attached for Council adoption is a resolution establishing fees in lieu of undergrounding. These fees would be payable for those projects which have received waiver of actual undergrounding requirements from the Planning Commission. Funds received from the feer1d be held in trust with accrued inter_st to be utilized at some future da"Ee to assist in undergrounding of the subject utilities. The fee amount was established based on estimates provided by the appropriate utility companies (see attached letters). Attached for Council's information is the Engineering Policy Memorandum which details the Comomission's policy and direction. RECOMWADATIOM: Staff recommends approval of the resolution establishing fees -nlieu of undergrounding utilities when required by Planning Commission approval. Respectfu y suhVited, L Attachments 1 ? Y 1 _ •\ L of w Southern Callfomfe Ed /son Company • o UM 312 1331 [ , MOVE •T"IT . OmrM CJIJ�MA 91741 ' January 23, 1986 n Lloyd B. Bubbs City Engineer Cit7 of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECTS Underground Utilities Dear Mr. Hubbs: �,�% CJL In response to your request for a coat estimate for under - grounding of existing overhead electric lines on a per foot basis, we have researched a number of completed projects within the City. We arrived at an estimate of $100.00 per foot (1986 costs) for your projections. The following items are factors which could increase the cost for a particular project: o Number of existing circuits on poles (including low voltage systemic). o Number of future circuits planned for the area. o Number of existing serviceslcustomers requiring conversion. o Street lighting requirements (These costa are not included in the above figure.) I hope this information will be useful. Please contact me at 947 -8226 if I can be of further assistan,io. Sincerely ��` /J. Gordanloz 1 Planning Manager �! JEG:cd +s ce: Cheryl Earns I rovember 20. 1985 Mr. Lloyd R Hubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 9anellne Road Suite eCe Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dew Mr. Hubbs General Telephone Company of California Foss Once B"2920 PM" CA 990,1769.29!2!01 S A7�'+ 6 1 7 V (I 'D on ReM 4Me, To 3718 • . 011 OF 4AaCHO CU1Al1Of1C1 V d91tpl%, CV'S'9'1 Per your request I m providir 'run netimnted, reasonable average per toot cost for Undergrounding telephone facilities. Please he avare that actual estimated coats vary widely depending upon the existing facilities. Our best entimste at this time would be $48 00 per Tat. Please be advised that all fees and negotiations are conaucted only between the developer /owner and General Telephone. We we not autborizing the city to act in our behalf or collect fees for the General Telephone Company. Being a Public Utility goverened by rul.s established by the Califomia Public Utilities Commission, there we some types of work which we we allowed to bill for and, of course, some we do not charge for. If I can be of further assistance or you have any questiona, please de not hesitate to call me at 714- 865 -3341. 0. HOU40 Network Facilities Ehginecring Administrator BCH: ft, A pan d GTE Caponson � 3 q/ I �A Y MMr�� ENGINEERING DIVISION ..,, POLICY MEMORA" SUBJECT: UNDERGROUND POLICY IMPLEMENTATION INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission has established a policy that: 1. All projects reviewed by the Planning Commission, unless specifically waived, shall be required to underground all existing fronting overhead utilities. 2 For pole lines containing 66 KV or larger electrical lines, only telephone, cable TV, and other telcomunication lines are required to be undergrounded. 151, irl- 3. Where overhead utilities exist an the opposite side of the street from the project, the Developer shall pay a fee equivalent to one -half the cost of the future undergrounding of the lines. This Policy, if not implemented properly, can result in costly delays to development projects. Where a project is required to underground utilities, it is our intent to notify then as early as possible of the requirement and extent of undergrounding involved. I: is the intent of this procedure to outline measures to implement the Planning Commission policy. PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND PROJECT COM.PiETENESS REPORT The earliest formal contact with Planning Commission projects is normally preliminary review or the review for project completeness subsequent to formal application. At this stage the Land Development Project Engineer will not have sufficient information to address the issue of undergrounding. In order to notify the applicant as early as possible of potential undergrounding i 2/28/86 yvl - x w� a ■ r� requirements, the following note will be placed on the Engineering Division r ` 'Project Preliminary Review Comments• and °Project u*Vleteness Report" forms (see Exhibits A 6 8). NOTE: In general, all existing overhead utility tines (except MV and larger electrical) fronting the project are required to be undergrounded at the Developer's expense prior to project occupancy. Existing poles shall be shown on the project plans including the first pole adjacent offsite from the project. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC) MEETING The requirement for undergrounding shall be formalized and presented to the Developer at the Technical view Committee Meeting. In order to evaluate the utilities affecting the project, the Project Engineer shall field review the site using the form on Exhibit H. For reference, the location of 66 XV tines within the City are shown on Exhibit I. In order to emphasize undergrounding requirements and to define and explore all pertinent issues related to undergrounding, each project should be analyzed thoroughly and a special condition written covering the precise limits of the undergrounding requirement. This condition will be included under •Special Conditions• on the 'Project Report and Recommended Conditions' form (Exhibit C). In addition, attached to each form, will be a one paragraph description of the status of undergrounding relative to the project and the recommended Commission action. This paragraph will be included in the running staff report under the heading Otiliy llndergroundina. STAFF REPORT COMMENTS (Examples) EXAMPLE: 1 (undergrounding required) Utility Underarnundina Overhead utilities exist along the Archibald Avenue frontago of the proposed project. No services are connected to the line and frontage width is felt sufficient to warrant undergrounding. It is recommended that overhead utilities be .ndergrounded extending from pole E129851 to pole E129852 (limits option: extending to the nearest poles offsite from the project boundaries) a distance of approximately 290 feet. No developable property exists on the opposing property and, therefore, reimbursement provisions do not apply. A special condition to this effect has been included in the approval resolution. EXAMPLE: 2 (full fee) C Utility Underaroundina Overhead utilities exist along the Archibald Avenue frontage of the proposed project. This property is one of two remaining frontage parcels on Archibald that could be underground by development. To underground this frontage, the applicant would be required to extend southerly approximately 200 feet onto adjacent frontage. In addition, construction would involve destruction and replacement of existing landscaping and recently completed street construction. It is the recommendation of the staff that utility undergrounding be waived for this project and that an in -lieu foe be collected as constribution to a future undergrounding project along the frontage. EXAMPLE: 3 (one -half fee) Utility Underaroundina No overhead utilities exist fronting this project, however, lines do exist on the Opposing side fronting Archibald Avenue with services extending across the - street serving the subject parcel. It is recommended that the applicant be required to pay an in -lieu fee equivalent to one -half of the established cost of undergrounding 290 feet of frontage and that all services to the site be provided underground. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Examples) EXAMPLE: 1 (undergrounding required) Existing overhead utilities on Archibald Avenue extended from pole 0129851 to poll E129852 a distance of approximately 290 feet shall be placed undergrond prior to Issuance of an occupancy permit. A Lima extension may only be granted through special agr`1nent approved by the City Engineer and City _ Attorney. EXAMPLE: 2 (full fee) The applicant shall pay prior to Issuance of a building permit (or map recordation where map is involved) a fee in -lieu of undergrounding overhead utilities fronting Archibald Avenue extending from the south property boundary to the center of 7th St -eet, a distance of 290 feet. Said fee as established ry Council resolution shall ba held for contribution to future undergrounding Of the fronting facilities. A ?1 services extending to the site shall be undergrounded. EXAMPLE: 3 (one -half fee) The applicant shall pay prior to issuance of a building permit a fee in -lieu of undergrounding overhead utilites along Archibald Avenue. Said fee shall be one -half of the front foot cost of underground for the Archibald Avenue frontage extending from the south property boundary to the center of 7th _ A a f. Y CStreet, a distance of 290 feet. Said fee as established by Council resolutfon shall be held for contribution to future undergrounding of overhead utilities on Archibald Avenue within the project area. UNDERGROUND CRITERIA It shall be the responsibility of the Land Oe•,elopment Project Engineer to evaluate and establish. if necessary, in consdltation with the Design Review Committee, undergroundiny requirements. If there is any question as to feasibility, the Engineer shall require u:dergrounding such that no pale; will remain within the frontage of the sits Factors to be analyzed in determining feasibility are: 1. Large number of serWe connection to private residence on the opposing-'" side of the street. 2. Unusual concentration of lines intersecting at a corner which creates Ccosts which may be unduly burdensome. 3. Frontage is so small that undergrounding would be disproportionately costly and benefits marginal. If the Project Engineer feels that the practicality or cost /benefit ratio of undergrounding is questionable, they should contact the applicant and his engineer to make them aware of the concern and the prorosed condition for undergrounding. Requests for waiver would then be reviewed by the Design Review Committee /Planning Commission. NOTIFicArioN TO DEVELOPER to highlight any undergrounding requirement, the following paragraph will be included in the transmittal letter which accompanies the condition transmitted to the applicant following Planning Commission approval (see Exhibit 0): C T� 'Please review any cdnditte,s relative to utility undergrounding required ` to conjunction with your project. Where undergrounding is a condition of approval, you should establish contact with affected utilities as soon as pos:tble to avoll delays in processing your project. If you have any questions, please contact the Plan Check Section of the Engineering Division.' PLAN CHECK PROCEDURE In order to further facilitate nottfir.ation of developers and their engineers of the undergrounding requirement, the following statement has been added to the *Plan Check Suhmittal Application• (see Exhibit E). NOTE: Projects requir`wg undergrounding of utilities will not be accepted for second check until notice is received from utilities that they are processing your application for undergrounding. No plans should be accepted for second check until we are in receipt of t'•e attached Exhibit F from impacted utilities Indicating that they have been contacted and that they are proceeding with the steps necessary to complete undergrounding. After receipt of Exhibit F, the Plan Check process may be completed and plans signed. It is nossible that serving utilities will not complete arrangements for undergrounding until they are in receipt of signed plans. A letter should be received from each servicing utility (i.e.. electric, telephone and cable T.V ). No permits with the exception of rough grading shall be issued until the Engineering Division is in receipt of Exhibit G from the utilities assuring that the necessary work has been contracted and scheduled. You should note that for any one project, separate arrangements will be required with Vii?.... � ...... � 4/ 7 C, I electrical, telephone and cable T.V. companies. Each should suWt the applicable notice letters. Exhibits F and G should be given to the developer's engineer after completion of first plan check along with the plan check list and the acccapanyfng transmittal letter attached as Exhibit H. The Plan Check Section should approve no permits beyond rough grading until the final notification letter is received from each serving utility. REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS AND FEES The Plan Check Section of the Engineering Division shall be responsible for the maintenance of all records pertaining to the collection of to -lieu fees, lSx establishment of undergrounds /unds and the development. maintenance and expenditvra of reimbursement- provided for in conjunction with undergrounding. Where undeveloped Propertles exist 611 opoesing forntages within the limits where undergronnding Is required by development, the City shall enter into an agreement with the undeag,eunding developer to reimburse one -half the colt of undergrounding proportionate to frontage. Exaeutlon of the rplmbR .emint agreement should follow the provisions of C15. REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT PRDCEDURE. Reimbursement eligibility should be detailed in the conditions of approval and only initiated on written request from the developer. The Plan Check Coordinator should Identify those projects where in -lieu fees have been receeved In the past and are eilgiDld foi participation Upon completion of undergrounding requirements, said funds shall be dispersed to the devnlnper to reimburse costs. Receipt and payment of funds shall conform to established Finance Department procedure. m e r• I PERMIT ISSUANCE ` No City construction permit shall be issued where undergrounding is required, until a fully executed copy of Exhibit G has been obtained from each serving utility and placed in the construction file or, it has been determined that no such letter is required. �y a.V C C ', oyss�., EXHIBIT A +/ T2 '! CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4ONGA - ENGINEERING DIVISION ,,. PROJECT PRELIMINARY REVIEW COM4ENTS To: Planning Division Applicant Address Phone Contact erson Project No. APH Street File Other data A. The items listed below have been checked as either A - acceptable or U - unacceptable projectwsubmitt alSUbSpecificiconmenlsiare contained inr Section n . below. A u ITEM: Z. T--Access locations - driveways and intersections. 2. Compliance with area circulation plan. — 3. Secondary emergency access. 4. Internal drive aisles and streets. S. Perimeter street design. _ 6. Compliance with City Storm Drain Master Plan. 7. Protection trPleod hazards. �Y 8. Protection frotd off site sheet flow. 9. Onsite drainage directed to an approved facility. 10. Provisions for drainage overflow. _ 11. Other NOTE: In general all existing overhead utility lines (except 66KV and larger electrical) fronting the project are required to be undergrounded at the Developers expense prior to project occupancy. Existing poles shall be shown on the project plans including the first pole adjacent offslte from the project. B. The items checked below shall be CW- Pleted and submitted with the next project submittal: 1. Report for a.drainage b.!Ioodinyy _S. tratfic d.other 2. Obtain an Off-sWe offs easement's .or a.si:rets b.'arainage c.other 4. Obtain an offsite drainage acceptance letter: 4. Obtain approval from a,CalTrans b.SBCFCD c.Other. ::D . Area Master Plan. -- Other C. COMMENTS: Note: The information contained hereon is provided as a service to assist in the preparation of a formal project submittal Modifications may become neces- sary based upon a more thorough analysis during the formal rrview process. PE Meeting By 12/31/85 1 of — 5Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ENGINEERING DIVISION Project No. Continued from Page _ APN —of ^ s/ 1, c EXHIBIT B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECT COMPLETENESS REPORT To Planning Division: Project No. type _ Location APN PE Meeting By Ckd Yes o, ccep a a e e - o, see A. Wow. A. �Theitems checked below shall be provided prior to the project being accepted as complete. specific caarents are contaired in Section B. below. _ 1. Access conflicts - show existing and proposed access locations (driveways and intersections) within 600' of the project. _ 2. Area circulation - show how adjacent parcels will gain access. 3. Secondary emergency access 4. Streets and drivH� isles - show sections, improvements, gradients, spot elevations, curve radii, utilities. interior Perimeter S. Flood protection - show proposed measures. 6. Offsite sheet flow - show protection measures. 7. Onslte drainage - show where directed, type of facilities. _ 8. Grading cross - sections at site boundaries. _ 9. Show existing overhead utility poles fronting the project including at I +ast the first n adjacent oifsite from the project. 10. Other NOTF In general all existing overhead utility lines (except 66KY and larger eTectrlcalf fronting the project are required to ht undergroulded at the Nvoloper's expense prior to project occupancy. Existing poles shall be shown on the project plans including the first pole adjacent offsite from the project. B. CO..,ENTS: NOTE: The information contained hereon is provided as a service to assist in the preparation of a formal project submittal. Modifications may become necessary based upon amore thorough analysts during the formal review process. 12/31/85 1 of _ Sx� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ENGINEERING DIVISION Continued from Page _ Projett No. APN — of — 613 x EXHIBIT ,: CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ENGIREERING OIVISION Pro3ect No. C Type Location PROJECT REPORT AND RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS APN Preliminary: TRC By rkd _ Final: PC Meeting By Ckd Yes No. Acceptable for Planning Commission - If No see I. below. I. Complete Prior to scheduling for Planning Commission meeting: _ 1. Report for _ a. drainage _ b. flood _ c. traffic. _ d. other. _ 2. Obtain offstte easements for a. streets b. drainage C. other. 3. Obtain offsite drainage acceptance letter. 4. Obtain approval from a. Caltrans b. SBCFCO c. Other. S. Revise Plans as noted below. _ 6. Arta Master Piano mss_ 7. Other. Comments: C II.Special Conditions: III.Standard Conditions - See Page 2 (on reverse) 12/31/85 1 of . ST S7, ::D63D :C : :DI.?C::S �1 � =i1^ wn4wNlNn ..IN. ..MI. Ip \V•N �r�Y �wn•rlMlnr�lr,•x�.�..11N'•r/W AII..r.• �I. M-NY wll N ... ✓ w .IIIwN rW11r�.. X w F IYw111N.Nr11 I.. I VM IM✓1 W V bnl rwl ✓ M✓ IM. W1 rM. XII IM. mil. 1...•.YIYX II .11`4•YWW IM ..X n.y)•nrll wY r • N ✓Iw1: prM. �L ti •'.r11 IM r✓M rlll X r•YM b C." U. M �I. w1111M1 ✓ Mbl✓ ••w..1 ✓ W M..l rb WII Y KYXX �L Kbn.11 Kn..Nrw. w.a....... n....•.. ^M..y.•4 XT. M•II ^w. N yM .. M.•.•.. ✓ N T h-.41'.wN....w W114 M.L .4...WNti1.. LW ✓W 4NYw.r4.4W �I. YWI. Iw..W. FII Y •r. Iw M1 wa..4 Mw W YYyI .r..l.b r M 1...1 .•M WII4 wX IY 411Xy ✓ W M..•h I Y W .X.I W r F ✓r W. MKq. IM. 4 L �r1•w�l1YYlYw..~i M4Y r•1.Yi I1W..I r. W1141...YU mot. MN.r M.wl.« »..1..1 M1 V MyrT r4 �ia..rN w r Y Yw . VII NWr4 4..Y.. mob. IWI' rNIYM�,Iw MIY q WII Y MYY4 4 W 1111 ..•.P INW rrYw1M1 �1. OXVXI I..I N1 �•.w...w1 YVM MMIWIn w M4• t v ✓ rN..�iry i. i�C�� N w wln WNiiiFl"Y trwti t. r.Y4 r N-r.1 .b I...MI wnY • .1•IM .b Kb.r n✓Ir.N Mu 4.Wb.IX .. u141r.M1 W 11.w1u �L fyN41 F NIYW ✓NW 4XW4 KVW. M M �4 I tW .✓.F.. w WlY p.. Imo. WII Y I.YM Y W ✓W Y .a�1 W ✓ 4 41.w/Y. ✓ YIYYI X.Y4 rYYXr.Y• IYI. 1-L W Y MN •~il YY rMr..1 Y M MIY .MI.✓w.1. ,K n V 41rW4 ✓r�Y. Yb� •Y.Y. WII Y .Yer r+. r ro •I.w Iwn Ati �L fXIYMw. r.+•4wI��M rY M..�i ..,� ^I seM 1y[�y��� Yl.wr WII Y� )w tll MI4 .IX.n ✓.w y11�yW.' J .'r.a..n •..I Ur. W r4.IM MII I.W M Y .11 w�Yw YIIXI Ia.IIIY Nnn W NM.I.N M -r. ..a Iwxw �.wNxY Y.MVV .Ir,rnW w1i. x`V'.n.. iw MW..Y.:,"I�i.. ITT�G�'- •'••�Fy Y n.W ✓ Y14YI,n.l4. �L MMrfIlIII4�w M14 (1�•��4WVwMY MM.�r IWi. r w IF':.+.Nw IIMI +.+•.�4 ✓W n N.r. � r ✓ Y14K Y.N4 r1.YXr y4.. mot. IIIM Y.4..M .I.4 MlgIYw,Iw IN. ✓I..I wY Y..I...r rw Mw.WK.n.Ih W<Y1111ti... µ I•M WII Y I..,YM I IM1.rIW Iw'MW IIIY �1 ..I.'ITMN. W fY14lY.•I Mb.. Y1VW tl W I.Y..w.4 ..bYY. �� 4V N...i. � Y .tlIq�YU11Y b W W MYI W✓ W W � .I.YIR •.XIY. YrI,Y W ✓XX •W YXW Wq Y M W NwwYwV ✓ W tM ly..s. AIL 4WYW Ilb �.FNM .4MgXW WII .W4 .Y Iw ✓IV X II „b ✓rM11 ..F1 YW IWY.rIM w rVM I4W. y.q 11 Y wYYX. •.M ,F.b ...11 Y rMUY Y N Y YY ✓ ✓.T W M.Y. W 1 Y tl�/ pI1Y.n•Y4r ✓ I.I V.YYI V Y W . ✓MW.. ✓.Y 7/8 /85 z X11. 4Yxn WII M Wr.11. 4.w. MIN 1 IMI ✓.w MI.. 4.141 w w�1.11 IL ` YIWy N w✓p1y.M� 4N N1 IT1 .N1..111. v.Wr ✓Nx4 ON YI4nn. �(. I YXI\ UII N N4M I'w 414E 11 n1 •T .�tlY 1M r11YY nMr�..1 L o-INM M.war 1.. I w 1 .111 Y Ny In 1 . ✓ 111 .. •1. W NM NYw�NN W tell1Yw11 IIN �I. YIry11W ✓141 .111MwYFXNw1111.w W1111.✓ l• w.1Y wr wbN ...111 Y. tiF. I..ww M�1 YIIXI Y w Iw•.•w. Y wl ✓.✓. K (NI ✓n.w.. Y. I. �I. •X.YW PWI .. /w lW .rr WI..YIIIY uNN 1 \Y. I. u. N.W •I .IX••'•. . 11/wll. I Y �L YF.N'.wb rwry w .r Yl w nl.w..l r �1. MIw M'MMM. II..4w.MX ww1...WI w11 Y••..r.. YIY.N IwN4 wtl ✓NY....M.N4 ..v Y Nb.n r �)• b.u.l. •VX1.K In W. I.. WII M ..YW I•. L �yll r �NM w 1 ✓Iw Ylw�wwy IM W4NY.1�N1 ^U .Vw1 On..l ''1111 iY. M1 n. n1Y ✓1....X U ✓rM/ mot. M tIV IU1. Vw K4 W11Y Y.YlYYWK1U.IWX W NI h r. �Y. I.II•.NI�I .'. ✓.Y.Y IYI Ir W WKI WII4 W11146 W b4 W.w Iw M.I.. III. 11w11 I.� W la4r 11.11 r•4rU IM1b1X b X4M I✓ MI Ne41U rMy1.11. C L UIIIIY �4 N.' .I�n.11 � tl Iar 11'Yyw YIXS .XXW X.NIi 11..:.i:YV4 .. M 41••n .+W...Y �(. b11NINY r K tN4 h MY wll 4 .�1w1. N W ,I•IW .i4 W YM IMM I4.Y b MYb .w b✓XU1 NI.IIIN. �L 111 TINY NMr W 1111 WII 4 Y.1.11M KYK XIIIIM II..I�YWI•I14.IWMY �M. �L MIiiY.n4�ib wlw t1114tlXjIwF YIV.IWrWY.Y �L GYM W114 NY41Y4II 4I 4111NW ✓41NW 1r1N IIIY. 41YIIiY. L YwI.w WII4rI4Y1YY IwW YI•IIwMr.1M1�NYw b�11 'IO .w 1Y4W 4111w4 4�W 4Yw1 (111 �I. /.wn11 M M 4 Kpr IN. •11 NIIIIIX W Y}X4wJ ..4YWU411tlW11rW yl 1114 4141gIM M b� I. IWr114Y.•�.M M Ynr.l1 �L /YII 1 W YK .Y1 WII 'w tl t111 YI.1b.1 M IWYR �L 1 ^Iq WII4 rq.IW 4 /YI144 WNNW tl W r •nbwlM wn �L 14411YY IIr1.N. 1.YYM MM11 wI..YM 44 w.41 14 W I4YM Ynl.p IIIbM1 �I. I.W 11 NInMM. • M N MKW V Iw 1414 11 twu.. \.WYI ONV41. wll 4 IIM . W ( 4 Y4 N lY N4A. Wtl IMIT 4 41YY1 I.YI W W 1� or - 5S Y� C • ■I �4 I tW .✓.F.. w WlY p.. Imo. WII Y I.YM Y W ✓W Y .a�1 W ✓ 4 41.w/Y. ✓ YIYYI X.Y4 rYYXr.Y• IYI. 1-L W Y MN •~il YY rMr..1 Y M MIY .MI.✓w.1. ,K n V 41rW4 ✓r�Y. Yb� •Y.Y. WII Y .Yer r+. r ro •I.w Iwn Ati �L fXIYMw. r.+•4wI��M rY M..�i ..,� ^I seM 1y[�y��� Yl.wr WII Y� )w tll MI4 .IX.n ✓.w y11�yW.' J .'r.a..n •..I Ur. W r4.IM MII I.W M Y .11 w�Yw YIIXI Ia.IIIY Nnn W NM.I.N M -r. ..a Iwxw �.wNxY Y.MVV .Ir,rnW w1i. x`V'.n.. iw MW..Y.:,"I�i.. ITT�G�'- •'••�Fy Y n.W ✓ Y14YI,n.l4. �L MMrfIlIII4�w M14 (1�•��4WVwMY MM.�r IWi. r w IF':.+.Nw IIMI +.+•.�4 ✓W n N.r. � r ✓ Y14K Y.N4 r1.YXr y4.. mot. IIIM Y.4..M .I.4 MlgIYw,Iw IN. ✓I..I wY Y..I...r rw Mw.WK.n.Ih W<Y1111ti... µ I•M WII Y I..,YM I IM1.rIW Iw'MW IIIY �1 ..I.'ITMN. W fY14lY.•I Mb.. Y1VW tl W I.Y..w.4 ..bYY. �� 4V N...i. � Y .tlIq�YU11Y b W W MYI W✓ W W � .I.YIR •.XIY. YrI,Y W ✓XX •W YXW Wq Y M W NwwYwV ✓ W tM ly..s. AIL 4WYW Ilb �.FNM .4MgXW WII .W4 .Y Iw ✓IV X II „b ✓rM11 ..F1 YW IWY.rIM w rVM I4W. y.q 11 Y wYYX. •.M ,F.b ...11 Y rMUY Y N Y YY ✓ ✓.T W M.Y. W 1 Y tl�/ pI1Y.n•Y4r ✓ I.I V.YYI V Y W . ✓MW.. ✓.Y 7/8 /85 z X11. 4Yxn WII M Wr.11. 4.w. MIN 1 IMI ✓.w MI.. 4.141 w w�1.11 IL ` YIWy N w✓p1y.M� 4N N1 IT1 .N1..111. v.Wr ✓Nx4 ON YI4nn. �(. I YXI\ UII N N4M I'w 414E 11 n1 •T .�tlY 1M r11YY nMr�..1 L o-INM M.war 1.. I w 1 .111 Y Ny In 1 . ✓ 111 .. •1. W NM NYw�NN W tell1Yw11 IIN �I. YIry11W ✓141 .111MwYFXNw1111.w W1111.✓ l• w.1Y wr wbN ...111 Y. tiF. I..ww M�1 YIIXI Y w Iw•.•w. Y wl ✓.✓. K (NI ✓n.w.. Y. I. �I. •X.YW PWI .. /w lW .rr WI..YIIIY uNN 1 \Y. I. u. N.W •I .IX••'•. . 11/wll. I Y �L YF.N'.wb rwry w .r Yl w nl.w..l r �1. MIw M'MMM. II..4w.MX ww1...WI w11 Y••..r.. YIY.N IwN4 wtl ✓NY....M.N4 ..v Y Nb.n r �)• b.u.l. •VX1.K In W. I.. WII M ..YW I•. L �yll r �NM w 1 ✓Iw Ylw�wwy IM W4NY.1�N1 ^U .Vw1 On..l ''1111 iY. M1 n. n1Y ✓1....X U ✓rM/ mot. M tIV IU1. Vw K4 W11Y Y.YlYYWK1U.IWX W NI h r. �Y. I.II•.NI�I .'. ✓.Y.Y IYI Ir W WKI WII4 W11146 W b4 W.w Iw M.I.. III. 11w11 I.� W la4r 11.11 r•4rU IM1b1X b X4M I✓ MI Ne41U rMy1.11. C L UIIIIY �4 N.' .I�n.11 � tl Iar 11'Yyw YIXS .XXW X.NIi 11..:.i:YV4 .. M 41••n .+W...Y �(. b11NINY r K tN4 h MY wll 4 .�1w1. N W ,I•IW .i4 W YM IMM I4.Y b MYb .w b✓XU1 NI.IIIN. �L 111 TINY NMr W 1111 WII 4 Y.1.11M KYK XIIIIM II..I�YWI•I14.IWMY �M. �L MIiiY.n4�ib wlw t1114tlXjIwF YIV.IWrWY.Y �L GYM W114 NY41Y4II 4I 4111NW ✓41NW 1r1N IIIY. 41YIIiY. L YwI.w WII4rI4Y1YY IwW YI•IIwMr.1M1�NYw b�11 'IO .w 1Y4W 4111w4 4�W 4Yw1 (111 �I. /.wn11 M M 4 Kpr IN. •11 NIIIIIX W Y}X4wJ ..4YWU411tlW11rW yl 1114 4141gIM M b� I. IWr114Y.•�.M M Ynr.l1 �L /YII 1 W YK .Y1 WII 'w tl t111 YI.1b.1 M IWYR �L 1 ^Iq WII4 rq.IW 4 /YI144 WNNW tl W r •nbwlM wn �L 14411YY IIr1.N. 1.YYM MM11 wI..YM 44 w.41 14 W I4YM Ynl.p IIIbM1 �I. I.W 11 NInMM. • M N MKW V Iw 1414 11 twu.. \.WYI ONV41. wll 4 IIM . W ( 4 Y4 N lY N4A. Wtl IMIT 4 41YY1 I.YI W W 1� or - 5S Y� C l' EXHIBIT D SUBJECT: The Planning Commission approved the above - described project at their meeting . Attarhed are copies of all documents pertinent to that appl)proval. The decision of the Planning Commission is final following Appealslmustabeafiled inrwriting began statehtheereason for the appeal, and be accaVanied by a $126 filing fee. e Please review any conditions relative to utility undergrounding required in conjunction with your project. Where undergrounding is a condition of approval, you should establish contact with affected utilities as soon as - possible to avoid delays in proceeding your project. If you have any questions, please contact the Plan Check Section of the Engineering Division. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is interested in receiving comments from applicants regarding the processing, a comment card is enclosed for your convenience. If you have a office at any time. ny questions, please feel free to contact our `} Sincerely, COftffTIY DEVELOPMENT DEPARIIO:NT C PLANNING DIVISION C Janice Reynolds Planning Secretary Attachments «: 12/31/85 �y .•r » =1 r7, a $¢i EXHIBIT E C TO: Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: SUBJECT: DEVELOPER: NAHE-YITLE This is to inform you that we have been contacted by the above developer concerning undergrounding of utilities fronting the subject project. We are aware of the project and are proceeding with the steps necessary to complete C the undergrounding requirement. � r Mrt KIM 12/31/85 r -� C iO: Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City of Raucho Cucamonga FROM: sUBJECT: EXHIBIT F DEVELOPER: _ L This 1s to inform lrou that our office has completed provision for the undergrounding of overhead utIed ins in conjunction with the subject project TV- and that work is being scheduled for comp EXHIBIT O TO: Project Engineer FROM. Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: WIDEROROUND UTILITY COORDINATION 4, Attached are copies of utility coordination notifications that will be required to insure the orderly progress of your project. Further checking of the accompanying plans will not procted until the Engineering Plan Check Coordinator is in receipt of an executed copy of Exhibit F from each serving utility occupying the overhead40"Itles fronting your property. Itsuance of permits beyond the rough grading stage will be held until the Engineering Plan Check Coordinator is in receipt of Exhibit F frm each of the impacted utilites. It is the intent of these notifications to effect the earliest possible coordination with utilities which require undergrounding. This early coordination will rrevent costly delays during construction of your project and possible delays in occupancy. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciates. LBH:Jaa Attachments C $ 12/31/85 a .4 EXHIBIT H t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ENGINEERING DIVISION EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILIT.ES r Project No. APN E A. FIELD REVIEW DATA: 8y: Notes 1 Th °P" row pertains to the project side of "A row pertains to across the street. 2 Fill in number of lines or "N" for no 3 Fiil in "Y" for yes, or "N" for no. SKETCH: Legend 66 66 KV Lines E Other Elec T Telephone C Cable TV 2/28/86 .. fOO s w � C N Y U C LI6.0- 66 b W O L C 'O 61 L 1 MIJ O L 0 W U N Ij1 L =0 L> O } Y L W pl L N EI N fJ O L 41 CI r d>> a m O L L 6 � L nG O Frontage Street e o $2 �'+ a° v01,¢ o.v d Loorents P A P A P A P A Notes 1 Th °P" row pertains to the project side of "A row pertains to across the street. 2 Fill in number of lines or "N" for no 3 Fiil in "Y" for yes, or "N" for no. SKETCH: Legend 66 66 KV Lines E Other Elec T Telephone C Cable TV 2/28/86 .. fOO s EXhI81T I CITY OF RANCHO .UCAMONGA - C ENGINEERINS DIVISION LOCATION OF 66 KY iLEC•RICAL LIVES t0.�W • ?.YC °� r +S� •4'f'.i 4 11-1 C N Legend M-66 K9 Iires NSEW -side of street iD - substaticn c 2!28/86 6 EXHIBIT J SCSJL.T:O'. J. 7:.113 A 1COLLTIG Or T.;C CI—[ C:MIL Or T•IC etZ Or %L%ch0 C•.c.,,,,. GLIrck,,., .VI'OVt:.0 A I1tOlt C::ZO LIST Or IOTC:TI IL I'OJCCCS roa vb`L TA':OH Or AY ACT:S'C L:•D:.ICe' C.:a I;Z IP Z"I i 41L6, OMar ch. prevision. o[ 9u511c Vtt1L[_u J 1-14 :0, The C41.on CDOpase Nen. ara,caaLe urn le.e funds .o elite. far the Dugad. of Yndufrovmw: ore[n.ad UCLLLty Lines; 4cd. PN this - elate tnrogo....... 'ca"' C"'Aco Me .etywtat.d 1191,I1I La cote 4cqaw.: and, `CcVlW, 04 [ect .... ,ea S",I M. YMar[alen to acquaint he Council wl Ch u. 4abmncs of in... tvno., the procedure. lnrnlv.d 1e N4 de.atrpa4o. et A pmled[ -Al roca.L.nd a odor', for protects fa[ itplu.amtlan under 0. p[sfba. SOa, SHMZMZC, " IT 1CSJ -10 by she City Count: Of eh. CItY of Cando Gcanen .. that Ma tallow'. [ ua popon4l Oropcm aloe.{ of1a[ As:, is avedca are 4... Gd to o"'C"T Order for IvDLbee...Iae of ad a.Llw yndrq[ousIIai DroLrav, 1v. yJAy[hlbatd A•r'mu . to.. hill Cw LUer4 re 1-e. Liz. Coal. 1. �b4.M 11 feutw4re Wren Al.... to 9iYN Avenue 7. Palm A,A =b.. Af[aw bwN [n Leaps Avenue a. Led L3rt. eae G:naltan St: ed. to ry m.[ Ar4w4 7. Gne1Lrt Str..t . Saw Line toad to I9.b sm.'. f. Ptne. .... h 3...r . P.ay. Avenue to Pe.[ Ct Cr Saund.p. It ST ALSO 1C9CLYf0 [vc Ch. C,,r Counc, dla:cq ."if to Lvplm.nt [h. f4l.awiw( pro,ct yltb rorrm[lY Arai cable fuel., I. A -c"211 tram,' - 1-r Atll 7aulev4r0 to 1u4 Ltte 1-s, IASSM. AlILO'.M. ,, ROIrm that aN day of Poredbr[, 1911 /.y ATM, Ire.t' PtisL, talonao, {ride, Schl .... r (� •NOM Hans 1t�t A13CT, Hon. y •.r. 4444. ^—�.� SY I i 1 I RESOLUTION NO. D(,..143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, WNBi- ESTABLISHING FEES III LIEU OF UNIIERGROUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES CJWHn! 9E001"' BY PLnnl.uul, COMM16UP13 "O"%"L WHERFAS, the Planning Commission and City Council a' the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to effect the removal of unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and 11v1ng environment within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that it is necessary to establish methods to equitably share cost and to accomplish undergrounding in the most cost effective manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission further recognize that in certain cases, it is impractical tc require development to underground utilities and that in such cases, fees in lieu of undergrounding should substitute for actual construction NON, THEREFORE, DE`4 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of s� Rancho Lucaaoiga, California that where the Planning Commission requires payment of f.es in lieu of undergrounding, the fee shall be the approrlate combination of the following. 1 Ehectricai Lines - $100 per linear foot 2 Telephone Lines - $50 per linear foot. 3. Cable T.Y. - $10 per linear foot. The fee snall equal the aggregate total amount per 'hear foot of each utility occupying the utility poles. (3 CIW OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT auanipW47o O 2 197] I DATE: May 21, 1986 TO: Ci.y Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 7441, located on the northslde of Lomita Drive, 321' west of Amethyst Avenue, submitted by Donald Tackett Parcel Map 7441 was approved by the Planning Commission on July 9, 1982, for the division of .91 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Low Development District located on the northslde of Lomita Drive, 321' west of Amethyst Avenue. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 7441 and euthorizing tha City Clerk to ca•ise same to record. Respectfully su bydtted, LON. : as Attachments PARCEL MAP 7441 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8W41 tt4tWfY{Nf moll Ot 01 nKT a," wealm I I i I ' � rRacr ' lw j z3zA� I I I� - -Ly1-GP.ANDE o r � LOMITA S I _ � . z QO J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION p DRIVE 1 :r. r x i W 7: Q T= �V PROJECT _ TITLE; PARCEL HAP 7441 EXHIBIT:_ _ ,AI'_ rrhsa 971�i • f sm. LOMITA S I _ � . z QO J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION p DRIVE 1 :r. r x i W 7: Q T= �V PROJECT _ TITLE; PARCEL HAP 7441 EXHIBIT:_ _ ,AI'_ s 1 S RESOLUTION N0, e0� C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7441 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7441) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7441, sutmitted by Donald Tackett and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the northside of Lomita Drive, 321' wrest of Amethyst Avenue, being a division of Lots 1 and 2 of Tract 2190, N.B. 31, page 69, records of Sdn Bernardino County, State of California was aoproved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 7441 is the final map of the division of land anproved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. " NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californiac¢at said Parcel Map Number 7441 be and the same: is hereby approved and the CITY Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. u i F 1 1 W T �� - ' 1 1�f. • Y.S.: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY Linda Beet, Engineering Technician o c3 1977 SUBJECT: Approval of Map, improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13027, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Etiwanda Avenues, submitted by `he William Lyon Company. Tract 13027 was approved by the Planning Commission on December 11, 1985, for the division of 45.5 acrestinto 157 lo•s in the Victoria Planned Community Development District, located on the sout.west corner cf Etiwanda and Highland Avenues The Developer, The William Lyon Company, 1s submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $932,000 Labor and Material Bond: $466,000 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C C.6R.s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RECON010ATIOW It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13201, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Miyor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Resedifully subgfttl ` &4L as Attachments 67 r ' TRACT CVO. 13027 HIGHLAND AVENUE I! 1 1 5 6 f 1 9 10 N I! IS I/ 16 w IS - 2 CORIAMVCI Cou%rr III III S 26 23 !/ D R 11 20 11 II I! W 17 IN IR it n m 11 12 S! 71 36 37 U IY w N U n ¢ IW p AV, t S6 N3 x ISO // 44 w U In a IA IR O U /! 11 .J Ib 2° SS 11 R R < >e 1 61 R ISI 17 I27 L 41 R H2 ,IU /I 6, 66 E. . g SO SI R 11 III it H amp © � ml CITY OF PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: TACT 13027 ENGINEERING DIVISION 6107 EXHIBIT: "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 13027 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of tt.e applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said rity, hereinafter referred to as the City, and The William Lyon Company hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract 13027; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developpgg�� as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located on the southwest corner of dighland TA and Etiwanda Avenues. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1 he Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 6 here- of within twe.ve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall ba submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to requi,e adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. if the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful -I- M means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. 5. The Developer shall provide ietorea water service to_ each lot of said development in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Hater District 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 1. Improvements required to be con3tructed shall conferm to the Standard Drawings and Standard 5�- cifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Se d improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by n, ;tuber. The Developer shall also be responsible for construc- tion of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage Errors or ommissions discovered during constructin shall be c.,•ected upon the dir`etion of the City Engineer. Revised work ?� due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 8 Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work, all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 9. the Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development 10. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedica- tion of the streets and easements in said subldivision, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. -2- 7D Until the completion of all Improvements, herein incorporated on Page 7 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as loprovemc 's shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said - Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it Is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made. 12. Parkway trees required tc be planted shall be planted b; the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provinc: by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later. 13. The Developer is responsible for meeting all condi- tions establisheJ by the, City oursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Ordiances, an`$°this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all Improvements constructed thereunder until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided hereinwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provi%:ed and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the requi ^ed improvement security has been submitted to the rity by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security the-efor has been released. 15 The lmprorement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptabce by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with Lire City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. B. To secure laborers and materialmen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.2. -3- 7/ 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney J A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or sL•veyor as •cceptable payment in full, or, if no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refurded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by tht City of the centerline tie notes an-4 written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof arl&Set forth on page 6 of this agreement. '=s 16 The Developer warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship Any and all portions of the improve- ments found to be defective within one (1) year following the data on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or $200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obligations as described to this para- graph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specif' d work with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment d trict. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been acceptel by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by he Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused -4- —7..)-- by the negligence of the Developer or any .Ontractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons Tne publip� liability and property damage insurance shall list. the City as additonal insured and directly protect the C1t,. 4t; officers, agents and employees, as well as the Dave,aper, nis contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance porlcie; issued hereund • shall so state. The minimum amgu.1ts of such insurance shall b, as follows: Contractor's liability insurance provfding bodily injury or death liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liaLil- ity limits of not less than $250,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate ,imir of $500,000 for claims fhicn may arise from the opera- Mons of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance cf this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less thaqJ500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each— accident or occurrence, and property is damage liability limits of not less than $250,070 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregat- of not less than $500,000 which may arise from th, .,?rations of the Developer or his Contractor In orforming the work provided for herein. 18. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an indorsement precluding the canceilations, or reduction to coverage of any policy evldencos by such certificate, before the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received notification by registered mail frog the insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the previsions contained herein, and of intent to comply wit. same, the Subdivider has submitted the following described i.provement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: -5- 73 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCL type: Principal Amount: $932,000 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR FAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: $466,000 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MINUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: $9050.00 Name and address of surety: NAINTENIINCE GOARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: NA Name and address of surety: 'CV 'Ts TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEeTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREnie th art ds heretaaJJ have caused these presents to be duly ack�IW1Obg with all formalities required by set c h p 6site their signatures. Date H 6 9 by — ,Developer rc Be �.ce -Prat ldent _/ — J Date n v 6 1986 by �� ,Developer St even Ford, Asalstant St- retary � Printed Accepted City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Approved: _ City Attorney MUST BE tRIZED TRIPLICATE 7S� SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MOMMITS) City Council City of Rancho Cncamonga P. 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of Tract 13027 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor on or before , as specified in the Engineer's or urn An engineering requirements nspecified in Section 66497LeofttheeGovernmeentlCode. aseau ash idep sit,Idsaidudeposit to the guarantee that Othe monuments Nwtyft ) e se the furnished as above will provided on or by the ate specified and undersigned. It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Rancho completed and theocostdthereof is tto be a charge against rsaidscashedep site s and the iaf Cucamonga authorized r tf�essary transfer from said cshdeposit to credit for the pr pecityund It is furtl•er agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the in Section 66497 of the Government surveyor gives they City shallhpayotocsaidrengineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days after thewritten differ difference between thethe ash deposit Rancho andutheoactual cos specifying said requirements. Cordially, THE wl�ucAM LYON COMPANY Subdivider 8540 Atchtbald Ava. Ste B Address Rancho Cucamonxa CA 91730 Date M@y 6. 1986 The deposlter of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be SAME AS ABOVE (Name) (Address) NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED IN TRIPLICATE 7S En9Eat C1TT OF RANCID CWAyOrA ENGINEERING OIYISIOM EMCAOACIpENR PERMIT FEE SCNEOIAE A•��! ..aY urawmg No, NOTE: DO" not Include current fee far writing Penh or panatnt deposits %LMTITY OMIT ITEM PRICE !MOUNT 19, 5 L.F P.C.C. curb - . • .F 24 l lal tl L.F. P.C.C. curb _ (only 0.f 21• gutty 5,00 L.F P.C.C. curb only 5.50 S.F IO"Ra.. Cu.b Sea w nlp S.F Dr P.0 pp sldtralR 1.75 0 S.F. Orire aPProaN 2.S0 A1- 725 r S.F. B• P,C.C. cross gutter (Inc, curb) 3.10 C.T Street excavation 1.50 z'°er• C.Y. tnpprted mbantaent FIF S.i "shed age of fu rode 015 S.F. Crushed +891 bae�pv Inch thlck)(5•) 0.03 T011 A.C, over .300 tons) 27.0 TOM A.C. 900 to 1300 tons 35.00 SF A.C. ppe fkuk)BILe ,1 o.avl S.F. A.C. 3• thhttr) O.SS Bi05; S.G. Patti A.C. (trench 1.75 S.. 1• thick A.C. evade 0.33 _2j1 U. Adjust serer clam to grade 250.00 EA. Adjust Salver clean ut to 1100. 150.00 - 's 000 FA. Ayust rater 111,410:0 grade )5,00 . �101LU2 LAF SGrrlca0ti(lntvsM. SSW oln) 1000 ;000 - -t La L.F. 2 x a• redrnpd has0ar 1.75 ..7,1?Tn S.F Remval Of A. Dar tvnt 0.35 0 L.F. Remonl of A.O.C. curb 3.30 L.F Removal of Rarl• Curb 4.0D EA. Street sipp,$ 200.00 EA. X.F.W. f slikG Pele 500.00 L.F Concrete block all 25.00 1 000 5.F. Rata rain call 20.00 L.F, 2t - CPP0150 -D) 52.70 AI L.R 21•A(P 10000 10.00 L.F. 10• PCP (2000 0) 29.00 -�A -- L.F. 2P RCP I((ISW 0)1) 4..5 L.F. 36• RCA 2000 0 e9.q • EA. 41.00 a _� 33• RLP IxslrD EA. Cacti basin Y • 1' 2000.00 _% u. Catch basin Y _1_ FA. C+tN basin Y • j0' 4500u.00 5ae0 [A. Local depression 500.00 10.00 _ EA. Local depression 12' 1000.00 FA. Junction structure 5000,00 Iloor, EA. Outlet structure, Std 1506 )500.00 •tope y EA. Outlet sir clots. Std 0507 500,00 1500 EEA. SMeeveui to A• 1m0 00 EA. ri an5l +•an 5 }rrafl,.r, 2.'W L.i Ce..cr<ft G SCeD.00 S.F LawJse.ppiw PA iwrl eileq 12.75 L.F. RA..ave Er''WR!P9 21.00 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE > O • SUB TOTAL •AESTORATION /DELINEATION CASH ,c•no CONTINGEACT COSTS ) MONIMENEAIION 92M (CASH) OOTO FLABM ANO fIATERIAL BOND (5ox) - ���A.Q�P.2• •Pursuant to City of Reecho Cueaoenga samftflsal Coda, Title I, gaDty 1.08, Adapting San B+rnardim Caucty Code Titles, Ch",,a I.S. + cash rtrtv+tfan/OaffOaat.03 GDmft g San G erde Wfor to fasuanca of m Englnterlas Construction Penh. ' Revfted 3/84 79 ,. RESOLUTION N0. 4e9-et'10*R 9Io — 1qS A CAMONGA. CALIFORNIA CITY APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. CUCAHONGA, IPAROVEMEtTf SECU0.ITV, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT t10. 1302 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract 110 13027, consisting of 157 lots, submitted by The William Lyon Company. Subdivider, located on the roved by said City as the southwest corner of Ettwanda and Highland Avenues, has been submitted A in prc tof Rancho Cucamonga uiiston Map Actdof dtheaStatepof California, compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 26 of said City. and stablished as WHEREAS, to meet the seidi requirements S Subdivider prerequisite asr ffered the approval of the Final Map of improvement Agreement submitted herewith fppor approval and executlan by said cityovalgsaid FinalgMaP offerings fortdedicati�on for�P public use the msireets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, Blid RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: be 1 approved and Improvement he Mayo isr author tzed ato execute same is on behalf of said City and the City authorized to attest thereto; and 2. andtsufficieimprovement t, subset to approval casptod form gand content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. Teat neatingfseame berapprovedsandathe City ClerkMis authorized cute the certificate thereon on behalf Of said City' 7 -17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician L_:�U%to F Z al 1977 1 SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tract 12832, located on the northside of Victoria Park Lane and the west side of Victoria Wirdrows Loop, submitted by The William Lyon Company. Tract 12832 was approved by!W Planning Commission on February 13, 1965, for the division of 16.9 acres into 135 lots in the Victoria Planned Community Development District located on the north side of Victoria Park Lane and the west side of Victoria Windrows Loop. The Developer, The William Lyon Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Day Creek Blvd. Faithful Performance Bond: $355,000 $1,600,000 Labor and Material Bond: $177,500 $ 800,000 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.dR.s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RECOlVDIDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 12832, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. I • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION 7� PROJECT: i TITLE: TRACT 12832 EXHIBIT: Ts CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 12832 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a munic' pal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referrv4 to as the City, and The William Lyon Company hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract 12832; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval subdivision generally lagated on the north isde of Victoria Park r� Lane and the west side o Windrows LOOP. NOW, THEAEFGRE, it 1s hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at DeveloVer's expense all i:provements described on Page 6 here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resi,lutlon of the Council of said City approving this agreement. hen first hianniversary default f nexten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request an extension of L.ae to complete the terms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances neces,itating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4 If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful 0 means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. 5 The Developer shall provide metered rater service to y each lot of schedules,a dife s development of Cucamonga County Water District. regulations. Distr 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replaL:ment, relocation, removal ot component required i water of improvementsto systemionflictwithconsr cttn the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7 Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications to the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and an the office of the City Engineer Said Improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construc- tion of an as needed sfor osafety incidental surface urainaget correctedrupon ommissions i se ]work Y Ons ofethissagreement andfsecuredsbyhthe covered planned work: B. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of attentioln listed cedures, contriol of dust, noise, or utilitiess and City hDepartments.to Failurenotofcomply 41th public section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of or adjciningksaiddde elopmenrtsresultinglifrom9Yorkorelaa within relative to said development. 10 Mork done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all wo -k In the event of unjustified delay In recover all from the 11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedica- tion of the streets and easements in said subidivisidn, up to the compl -tion and acceptance or said work or Improvement by said give and exist nttinosaid street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. FIX Until the completion of all improvements, herein incorporated on Page 7 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Sala Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made 12 Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Cnmmunity Development Director. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is ater 13. The Developer is responsible for meeting all condi- tions established by��t�e City pursuant to the Subdivision Ma Act. City Ordiances, Ad this agreement for the development, an� for the maintenance of all improvements constructed thereundi until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and na improvement security provided nereinwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. :1 This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement togethe- with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the hereir named, and by resolutlnn of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the followin+ and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the form dad content specified by the City Attorney. 3 A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. To secure laborers and materialmen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.2. M 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and con,ent specified by the City Attorney. 3 A deposit with City of money or negotiaole bonds of the kind approved for securing A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof adjlcl'set forth on page 6 of this agreement. is 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship. Any and all port ..ns of the improve- ments found to be defective within one (1) year following tha data on which the 1m rovements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of 311 charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or $200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obligations as described in this para- graph. The maintenance guarantee security shalt also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenance assesscent district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance. 17 That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indlr-etly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as additonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liabil- ity limits of not less than $2E0,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with as aggregate limit of $500,000 for claims which may arise from the opera- tions of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability liialts of not less tvan r00,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each 'Wident or occurrence, and property ��- damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $500,000 which may arise from the operations of the developer or his Contractor in performing the work provided for herein. 18 That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction ih coverage of any policy evidences by such certificate, before the expiration cf tnirty (30) days after the City ehall have received notification by registered mail from the insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the following described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: mi: Name and address of suwp: s3 TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have cause] these presents to be duly executed gnd acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the pItes sex forth goposite their signatures, f Date April 3. 198;: _ bk Jy /,a9,/,,, Developer Date April 3. 1986 by iC � ,Developer Steven Ford Assistint Secretary Accepted r n e City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Aoproved: , City Attorney DEVELOPER'S SIGUATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE 8S - FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: $355,000 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: $177,500 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: $ 7,950 Name and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of suwp: s3 TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have cause] these presents to be duly executed gnd acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the pItes sex forth goposite their signatures, f Date April 3. 198;: _ bk Jy /,a9,/,,, Developer Date April 3. 1986 by iC � ,Developer Steven Ford Assistint Secretary Accepted r n e City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Aoproved: , City Attorney DEVELOPER'S SIGUATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE 8S - � [n9Ett x CITY OF RANCHO CUC&40WA EIR,011RING " ENCROACHMENT FEEISCHE0111.E F For Irom,edent: TRACT 12832 ogee: 3.15- no Convult" 7: - File Re leresCe City Draying o. 974 NOTE: Does rot inclose currert fee For writing Perelt or paeeaent de"Sil OULITITT UNIT ]TEN PRICE 94OUNT 6062 L.F P.C.C, curb -6' QF 24' gutter 7.25 30,310 L.F P.C.C. cure . 8• C.F 24• gutter 6.00 L.F P.C.C. cure on 17 5.50 1.R1R L.F R.C. berm 4,50 �a ltt S.F 4• P.C.C. sidewalk 1.75 [o Mal &1-0 S.F Orlee approach j,� is --% atrj� S.F 8• P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc curb) 3.40 11 1116 C.T. Street excavation I.so C.T Imported eabanlpent INe.1171 S.F PRparatIM of subgrade O. S.F Crushed agy. ease (ver Iticn enlcq 0 0 TON A.C. am 1300 tons) 27.00 TON A.C. 900 to 1300 tons) 35.00 TON A.C. 500 to 900 tons) 13- 45.00 Tar jjy1P4 S ! A.C. th 500 tonal A.C. thick) 60.00 0.55 S.F. Path A.C. 1.75 SA. A.C. o,eN) 1• MICR C. dnerla7 0.30 t' iA EA. sewer • to grads EA. AdJust Adjust "Ater clean out to erase clean ISOM 175.00 ( LA. street light valves to grade 75.00 - 22 _jj_ U. Street lights 1000.00 ZT.WAt -' L.1 eamlcades (intend $500 min) 1,00 j L.F 2 naaser P rOf 3.75 IN1 S.F l Reamval of F.0 paremellt A.C. 0.35 lnl L.F. Remval of P.C.C. Nro 3.30 LA. of A.C. eem 1,00 - EA. Streel Strait Sfgl.t 205,00 - �� U. and poll 15.00 L.F Concretes Black wall 29.00 S.F Aggregate Vale Retaining 7,00 ION ION C.T ease 7,00 L.! Concrete Concrete structures, 18• RCP (2000 0) 425.OD _ JPa L.F. 21• RCP OE HA 32 UO L.F. 36• RCP 2000 0 MOD 49.00 L.F 48• RCP '1200 0 76.00 EA. FA. Cato basin Y • 4• 2000,00 - -r0J1- �_, EA. Catty Bagel Y • 7 2500,00 - I_ EA. Catch basin 4 • 10' 3SOO.00 '- 7i5Gei EA. Local deprellen a' SOp,00 QA. Local depression 12' 3000.00 1 -1 E14 ,Amctlan strYctur¢ SOOO,00 -j-- A' EA. Outlet structure, RIs /506 1570.00 �L EA. Outlet structure, ,td 0507 MOT T- _� EA. a." posts L.F Guard panel (wood) 25;003 L.F Satcut 2.00 ' EA. Headwall (48• weep) 4000,00 L.F Redwood neater 1.75 IIy 3.F LVoicapingg t imtgat lcn 2.75 �� L.F. Rail 19rD {P.C.0 I 7,50 r ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 14 799 Art TOTAL S 32222,,1331 -RESTORATION/04 I NEAT ION CASH j!0W- C04TINGENCY COSTS I DEPOSIT (REFUNaUME) FAITIOU PEAFORNANCE go" (IDOL) i53'CLD- T HIOIi161ElOPTION SUAITT (CASN) 7.950 LABOR AND HATEGIAL BOZO (505) t}r� Ohl "Pursuant w CIt7 of Rancho C*c~gr municipal Code. Title i, Sernanim{dantY I. [chapter I.M. a!¢ptirg Sm CON Titles, CMpten 1.5, r usn restoratim /dgllarr N deposit lMlt be sad¢ prior to Is"uaMe of N [n9ieeering Cogseruetlan Permit. •�- Revised 3.84 ,� Rw -as®Is SuBDIYISIOY GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMEIITS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final cap of Tract 12832 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or Certificate or and before agre s� to Bfurnishpethe en tes the thereoneetos comt Surveyor's engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Sovernment Code. The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of $ 7,950 (Receipt No.., 17-6 as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments wiIIbee seE and the notes furnished as above provided on or before the date specifieo and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the undersigned. it is further understcod and agreed that in thw- event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirei,%pdts within the time specified, the City of Rancho completed and theocostdt hereof istto be a cha "a againstrsaidssashedepnsit and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidcnce to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed in Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty p(30) days after thewritten differencee betweenfrom thethe cash deposit Rancho nd�thepactual cost of said requirements. Cordially, The Gillian Lyon Comoany _. Subdivider 8540 Archibald Ave., Ste B Address Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Date April 3 1986 The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be Same as above (Name (Address MOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FBLLY FILLED OUi AND SIGNED IN TRIPLICATE i ' R4a,:RT N[VI[J,D CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT a OYA�� c LLOYD W. wuaHACL wn. s• ww, so ..c.c. .. an .. •aa mI aas CARLE G RL[ R ANO[R[ON +,C TOR A CNER eAI, JR I -.w4•, aRA Pr,a GRLEN A t C[TRI[a A nuqu�t 7, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Depart mart P 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Cali_nrm a 51730 Attantlon Mrs. Barba a ALH.1 Gentlemen: The William Lyon Company, Developer bf Tract No. 12832, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, have devisited with this District a Material and Labor Bond, a Faithful Performance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement for tlR waterline and sewerline construction :or said tract These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, with_r the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water Distract. T"re waterline and sewerline improvement plans have br-eu approved by this District Yours truly, CUCAy/M�OONjG/A�-%%�UNTY WATEP DISTRICT ,'!t 'f4W111 '.(.lil! Betty Fiel1 Secretary 0 gg - t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 12832 (DAY CREEK BOULEVARD) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and The William Lyon Company hereinafter referred to as the Developer WITHESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approvPL subdivision known as Tract 12832; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdlvislon generally loc ted on the north side of V ctoria Pork Lane and the west side JW Windrows Loop. i NON. THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 6 here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of tho Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow - ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed 3 The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expirat on date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement sec..rity, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 6 !f the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or hi; surety -I- MO the full cost and expense incurred. S. The Developer shall provide metored water service to each lot of said development in accordance with the regulatlons, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water District. 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system to conflict with construction of required itprovements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the ownev of such water system 7. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file In the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby Incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construc- tion cf any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or ommissions discovered during constructin shall he corrected upon the di_.�egytion of the City Engineer. Revised work tue to said plan modifNatlons shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall he observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -pay within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any snd all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 11. Said Jeveloper shall at all times following dedica- tion of the streets and easements in said subldivision, up to the completion and acceptance of said work improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or da ^gerous conditions. Until the comlletion of all improvements, herein incorporated on -2- 94) Page 7 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Sala Developer may close arl or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary `o protect the public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement work, gradin,. and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, a4lchever is later. 13. The Developer is responsible for meeting all condi- tions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Ac', City Ordlances, 40q, this agreement for the development, ands for the maintenance o7Dall improvements constructed thereunder" until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided hereinwlth shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security lereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the Herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, ai,d this agreement and the lcprovement security therefur has been released. 15. The Improvement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 6649).1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposit., of public monies. D. To secure laborers and materlalmen: A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form acd content specified by Government Code Section 66499.2. 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the form -3- yr and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Nap for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. 'fhe amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment to full, or, if no value 1g submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. D. The required 4onds and the principal amounts thereof � set forth on page 6 of this agreement. �, g 16 The Developer warrants that the Improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the Improve- ments found to be defective within one (1) year following the data on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or $200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obIIgations as described In this para- graph The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway mairtenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release 1s otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Na,. 'ct and any applicable Cit- Ordinance. 17 That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property dawage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or -4- subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public as liabilit and additor.al insuredp and y.directly i protect the elCity, stits heofficers, agents and employees, as well at the Developer, his contractors- an heaeunder shall nsoastate� n and all The minimum amounts ofo such einsurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's ofonotile o n less accident Or for occurrence, and liabil- ity limits of not less than $250,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $500,000 for claims which may arise from the otiera- tions of the Developer In the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for eac.l accident or oc ^urrence, and property damage W.,rbility limits of not les: than $250,000 for eac accident or occurrence, with an aggregate, of not s than operati0nsofthe SDeveloper vr his arise t Contractor In performing the work provided for herein. 18. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each such the cancellations,sorlreduction in coveragendorsement of nany policyoevidences by such certificate, hefore the exptretion of .hirty (30) days after the City shall have received notification by registered mail from the Insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and 0' intent to comply with same, following described improvement id t security,and nhan affixed his signature hereto: -5- 93 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: 1,600,000 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: 800,000 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surely: t rs TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the par ies hereto have caused these presents to be duly executehate a44know}gdyed with all formalities required by taw on the dates sEt oJs apposite their signatures. i / Date nay 6, 198,6'� Dd( % Ayllf / .Developer Date May a, 1986 by ,Developer gn ure Steven Ford Assistant Secrete" rT e Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation + By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Approved: City Attorney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED AND-COMPLETED IN TRIPLICAT_ 9T For CITY OF RANCID COCNCHGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE -fed by: Stanley C. Morse Drawing No: NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing perm:t or pavement deposits QUANTITY UNIT ITEM PRICE AMOUNT 4.170 L.F. P.C.C. curb - B' C.F. 24' gutter 6.00 520- L.F. P.C.C. curb only 5.50 �I 435 - S.F. 4' P.C.C. sidewalk 1.75 21400- -WON- S.F. 8' P.C.C. cross gutter (inc. curb) 3.40 L.Y. Street excavation 1.50 I77. r S.F. Preparation of subgrade 0.15 �I 456 S.F. A.C. (3' thick) 0.55 IS6 1411- S.F. A.L. (5' thick) 0.95 —29- —3- EA. Street"Vghts 1000.00 -IWO- E.A. Barricades (intersec. $500 min) 500.00 �3 S.F Removal of A.C. pavement 0.35 j A. Street signs 20.00 Reflectors and posts 35.00 30Q —Z41F L.F. 72' RCP (1000 D) 98.00 L F. 24' RCP (1500 D) 35.00 - 1 Juu L F. 35' RCP (2000 D) 49.00 1170! L.'. 48' RCP (1200 D) 75.00 —2- EA Catch basin N - 4' 2000,00 EA. Catch basin N - 8' 2900.C3 �- EA. Catch basin N - 22' 4500.00 �- —3- EA. Local depression 4' 500.00 —�- EA. Junction structure 5000.00 EA. Outlet structure. Channel 1500.00 I43 020 -I�30 S.F. Landscaping8 d irrigation 2.75 �I- L.F. Roll curb (P.C.C.) 7.50 L.S. Incidentals ENGINEERING INSPECTICi FEE 64,625 SUB TOTAL 1.307 411 "RESTORATION /DELINEATION CASH I.0011.uuu CONTINGENCY COSTS DEPOSIT (P.EFUNDABLE' - FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (1005) - I- 600�Di10" MONU14MATION SURETY CASH) N/A LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (S0:) — 'BWO' 6- *Pursuant to City of Iancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title I. Chapter 1.08, adopting San Bernardino County Cod Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash restoration /deTtneatiui deposit shall be wde prior to lszw ace of an Engineering Cone"ction Pewit. Revised 3/84 0 RESOLUTION NO. 204' --tIEW '9(p — li(p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT No. 12832 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12832, consisting of 135 lots, submitted by The William Lyon Company, Subdivider, located on the north side of Victoria Park Lane and the west side of Victoria Windrows Loop, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; avid WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Nap of said Tract said Subuivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said city, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public jse the street: delineated thereon. s� NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamunga, California, as allows: 1 That said Improvement Agreement be and the sata is approved and the Kiyor is authorized to execute same nn behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That tM offars for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. i. r STAFF REPORT o i L I DATE: May 21, 1986 M. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TRACT 12833 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRIFT ta. i AS ANNEXATION N M h The attached resolutions set the We of the Public Hearing for June 4, 1986 to annex Tract 12833 to .he City" °trees Lighting Maintenance Districts. The Engineer's Report f both Districts is als„ attached for preliminary approval. RECWlIEHOATION It is recommended that City Council a4opt the attached resolutions setting the date of Public Hearing for June 4, 1986 and giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports. ResD ctfully L1 y Hubbs' City Engineer LH:LP:ns Attachments: Resolutions Engineer's Reports 9,7 -S;- I RESOLUTION NO. V, - IY 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 15 TO STREET LIGHTING MAIN'.ENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on May 21, 1986, the City Council of the (ity of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuart to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requlr(s or should be modified in any respect. sb,s V r NOW, THEREFORE BE IT gESOLVED by the City Council tf the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1; That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized costs and expenses oof said work and of the incidental expenses in corneclion therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them re hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and 403r to said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of lend in sMd7s essment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said worl and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained In said repot•t is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECT104 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fogy tine purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. i RESOLUTION NO. 8 cP - Ili $ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER ,THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, Ah ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 15 TO STREET LICKING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, IMEREFORE BE IT RESOLVFD by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrt tlon� o�f Work: That the public interest and convenience require an Is it i the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street ryts the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described to Sec on 2 hereof Said maintenance and operation Includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be loca,,d wTtRn roadway r gigit- -way enumerated to the report of the City Engin .. and more particularly described on maps which are an file in the iffice f the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 15 to Street Lighting Maintena ce District No. 10. SECTION 3. Descrt tlon of As District: That the eontemp tt�wora' —tn the op n ono sa My Louncil, is of more than local or ordi.iary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said wort chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and whit'+ district is described as follows: All that ce•.tain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain •Map of Annexation No. 15 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10 maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report : of En sneer The City Council of said City by Resolution o. as approved t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled *Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10 is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. WAd SECTION S. Collection of Assessments_: The assessment shall be collected a��same time an n e same manner as Coonty taxes are collected. The City Engh.eer shall file a report annually with the City Council or said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their 'irst regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Jane 4Z'4t;b -at t.e lour o xv n e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be dune or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Cesolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and mast contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, suffictert to identify the same, and mast be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not s, Am upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca n amend LNhttna Act of 1972: All the work " hereto DropaseJ— sTiall 3 —done •arried tjircig in pursuance oP an act of the legislature of the State of California designateA the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and dighways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall he ma to ec on 61961 of the Government Code. The Mayer shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least o ^ce in The�Oatly Rye or�t, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ar0� "California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 106 RESOLUTION NO. g(Q —1q 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. I TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, on May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has male and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficiert, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. ly y-oz NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Zity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineers Estimate of the Itemized costs and expenses o sa wor and of the lncideital expenses to connection therewith. contained to said r!port be, and each of them are hereay, preliminarily ,pproved and confirmer:. SECTION 2: That th! diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descrfGTin said report, the bound= ies of the subdivisions of land wittin said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sais d— �sment District ti proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for fFe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and cursuant to the proposed district. /0/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMnNGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 15 SECTION .. Authority for Report This report 1s in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) SECTIO3 2. Gener4l Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit 'A' into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 The City Council has determined that the street light; to be maintained w4ll have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directiy abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided Vith the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordina -y and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets )mpro%ement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis in the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. :rCTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have, been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipula+.ed in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exac' location of the street lighting areas The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby =::.a a part of this report to the same extent as it :aid plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs arc estimated only, actual assessments will be ,S based on actual cost data. /0,)' The estieated total cost for Lighting Maintenarce District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 15) compr!sed of 7,734 lots, and 262 95DOL, 230 5800L and 3 27,500L street lights se chnwn below: 1 S.C.E Maintenancd and Ene�oy: Lamp Size- quantity — itT 5�300L 23C 8.75 27,500L 3 14.00 �Algh - rsesure Sodium vapor Lamps Rate No's Total 262 X 9.90 X 12 31,125.60 230 X 8.75 X 12 • 24,150.00 3 X 14.00 '&" 12 5C4.00 55,779.60 2 Costs per dwelling Unit Total Annual Maintenance Cost 55.779.60 • 7 21 year /unit 0 o n s n s r c 5734- 7 21 divided by 12 • .60 /mo /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot as explalred in Section b. SECTICN S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attachta to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance Oistrict no. 11, Annexation No. 15. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shalt be equal for each unit. Where there is mare than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall bx proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. /03 SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts reiclution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. d. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. S. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. � � e 1 EXHIBIT 'A8 Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 15 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Tract 12833 5,6DOL 9,500L 27,500L 22 6 2 t 2 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A STATE OF CALIFORNIA A T Im i , mj CIE CITY ENGINEER RC23889 DATE l� V2&� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 1 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with 1. Division 15 0 the Streets and (Landscaping and Liguting Act of 1972) SECTION 2. General Description the requirements of Article 4, Chapter Highways Code, State of California This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit 'A' into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights Work to be provided f V Ith the assessment. established by the districts are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or dev lopment plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas The plans ind specifications for street lighting improvement on the Individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as If said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacEcent of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, It is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. /0 7 The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (including Annexation No. 1) comprised of 862 lots and 361 street lights is shorn below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp ze* quantity a e 15 9500L 6 9.90 •ingn Pressure Soutum vapor *"SCE Schedule LS-1. All night service per map per month, effective January 1, 1983. Lamps Rate Mm's Total 6 % 9.90 X 12 712.80 355 % 8.75 12 37,275.00 37,987.80 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 37 F 987.80 44.69 /year /unit o. o n s n s r ct abz 44.69 divided by 12 • 3.72 /mo. /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 30, Annexation No. 1. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this raport. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. i 3X SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex to District and sets public hearing date 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. S. Every year In May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. TIP- EXHIBIT `R' Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 1 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 3: Tract 12833 222 (g�8000 Y S w V} IT jf • R 1 i A at •y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ����� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARl1INO a STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- 1L0Y0_MUBf15, CITY ENGINCFR Rre ease., �— N Page T3 RESOLUTION NO. 8 (P /,SD A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RI,NCHO C-ICANUNGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, A.N ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATINC SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING HAINTEIIAICE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHT:NG ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND FLACE FOR HEARIhb OBJECTIONS THERETO NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscapinc and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets end Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri titionon of Work: 'hat the public interest and convenience requ re an� s ti Tie n�tentTn of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street'Wts the boundarie•; of the proposed maintenance �r} district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facill:ies in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Mork: The fonagoing described work is to be located wits nn roadway r g t -o -way enumerates in the report of the City Engineer and more P, ocularly described on mups which are on file In the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 30. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplates worK, in the opinion of said City COUVILilt is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Coenc.l hereby makes the expense of the said work •')arg able upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, acrd which eistrict Is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District rAo. 30 maps Is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report�of En�s_ne�er: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. Teas approve td a report of the engineer of work which report Indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the distric` boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting ilaintenance District No. 3' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the aanunt and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the .ark. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same :toe anA In same manner as County taxes are. collected The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first relular meeting in rune, at which Time assessments for the next fiscal year will he determined. SECTION: 6. Time and Place of�Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on .June d- LS'8ii, —at t-F—Fur 7 7 30 rya in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extert of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done !)r carried out or why said district should not be formal in acco�Gance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in Ariting and must contain a description of the property in which each signer th,arecf Is interested, suffi,ient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of seid City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the tamer of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landja in anand__Lightin Acct of 1972_: All the work " herein proposed is nail a one a n3— carried routh gh in pursuance of an act of legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma�Ursuant to ec on tiI of e� -Gove� Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in Tho Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of -Tatar o, a crnia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. y� STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21. 1986 TO: City Council and City Mi,ager FROM: Lloyd 8 Huhbs, City Er,'neer BY: Richard R. Cota, Assoc ate iv11 Engineer V o F t .. s 19T SUBJECT: Ace ,tance of 'Street o1 H'ghway Easement' from the Southern Pacific Transportation Cc Pany for the Archibald Avenue Railroad Cressing (N- BBO- 522.90) Widening North of Base Line Road Attached are two copies (SPTCO- Original and Licensee's Copy) of the above subject easement agreement from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company for the City's execution thereof. This ea:ement agreement provides the required right -of -way to widen the above subject Archibald Avenue Railroad crossing aad Its related crossing gates from the existing 40 foot wide roadway (one traffic lane in each direction) to the proposed 72 frot wide roadway (two traffic lanes in each direction). Funding for the construction of said railroad crossing widening is concurrently being sought, from the Federal Government via CalTrans Local Assistance. Acquisition of right -of -way from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company is one of the prerequisites for receipt of said Federal funding. RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving and accepting the Southern Pacific Transportation Company Grant of Casement for the Archibald Avenue Railroad crossing (No. BBO- 522.90) widening north of Base Line Road. Respectfully subat ted, LHB: :bc Attachments , i (1 .I aarllIJI asrixx sa -z� 1 STREET OR HIGHWAY EASEMENT Qa�O A\WtIIIUTf• KaE. Nb dYd If y.tl 4n.Ne SOVIBCA.V tACIPIC TAASSP022A=M CO ANY, s DelAbimre mrporatlon. r- + -d•r1 A.YaY zed CTTT Ot MHCOO OXIA O.V6A, a cnnlrlpal oorporatlon of fSe Sute of T+llfotnis, aElrus, 712maart4, M1.+eIY� \amA 4Rbs erw m ,'n.K.. lb ryN b IvYM{...avNrvn, muaNn W w . bmr s 4,t+Y. "NF4.V' ..a.MNw tY IW M.YrV Easnbtl m W \nvbtl R.AAa 'A^ Aut.vE. L 11b npu Arno r.KN N emeWE Ibdtl ..r\IKV W .4, w\ ..b.d bi.rd . dw ..r\SN .AA W ,.eq ®1 fat.pe,. W Ktl.v a.fN. dW Aka.., Y u,pYq .nlrarYf.0. .mR Yul EEINre fulYe zed .4i b NE4.Y .\obYmKa W e,bM .4R Yd PNY YRdd W. YO u.A r.bLUY .i 41 v rbbbn.tl .abn 1N,liq�y,. tlb rcWnWn fm. RNtr.tl IL, .ub (.yAy. u.afm ..4 ufe.dd �.eY W gY..I.ne Yd f�iAi. Vm1 dmrWm n N.•dR, .rd Mlidlnfb b 11. P.. nf.t d auh.d Y OLLmb. W wifm. b by .9 W P> bbrlNn.n rf 4. ELL, u . eJn en f Vr(., Yd .4.. 4 r.befed unb a.IeuJ W N:RNq. Yd .vsr.. W ILLaI m mur a masra� abMU, w W nneve ..dw .M fuzee rnnwm.wm mwwwn fTIW PTM1Y fYi4ns N -A .rtr w1n a.,.i Yd MYn, le 14 ..eH R Letl VK4R f..ia� mwtl !m WIpaRn ) awo.a MII .v 41GaRYe b iY4 w d.en M W A..1. d.u, N,My wa was rNee..l dfd rW1r.tlY 4W b W Ydennnt mMl, TiL tore b \I!.°.', b Y IaR-. Ora. e.�r.rY 16bb,m rtmmw..Rmw. eR.r<n/ae. 4rA W .bFq d .AI, .MA �q, .r(N, Yd C.,,.,,f b •...va ' mK .lea eiA le brab.be Y . mRren .nleb W uu..e Vad rain �.M1b be rD n.n haeWNe Jug f s N.wn rlEbnV rE. ebYns,br _ �wwwuar d nd bean, N Ivr \ TN. aKK \ba rat 4 .acneE Y 1mvYba a uul..rlr web, n fruu W rYk b bW9 .. b .ubsmr W W.bLL,n d w dAd.\ \.fe. Jr++Y..n..e M1 edeebntl M4vR v W (r]WN d w hl.rnd. \e.eawib y„Y N.le (^r• LL Y)m a..e erdl. tlw b .IVk Nd PMfn) e,Rd Y rbasY, fs KYK.NKe d ..d a O+KY tlaf Wun Yv M1RVY) rR.rm.rwl Y1Aalb b enbYV +mR1ut n..IK.M .N w utl N.h.Y AO lorr.tb pe(bbwr .RY 4\ W laF..l> I.la- E[qy, .fsi Reu4 aelntll a.rdW few d m1+YasY .pmbK Pb b.mlKbdna YJ .v! T Nu'LeE'. a..... 4.M .,ur ppwvpmvl� d arm Y Edow+ b w d Y+VImE Y.kE b, vs r ra.etlnRlb. d ad ha6.Y •Y W bn W ,.ybv bv.d b .en..atbe .AA Ur lance all.e a 9i1Y1 rmKa LL W 1b1. .4rdY W .A b YN PARV M .q W I WI.+( -. by b Vb IA. YI1b Rf YN Rile rw ..m\p. r ,ef.l d o.. III m W rv.l5. RNaN WO mN Y W es.ra d N. m. Y .A.r.hwl M1 Eemrbn.d .b Rtlatl .4A Yate bn W rYb. N tlLUw b M M 4'FrYreelm d W NN. bmsb+. n. U.bn Imele.. �I• jomwdn d Ytl Vrw�„ R W wl W.d ur' w. d .,en b e esesr�\ .- .. --._. w.+. d Ia +KU..b.b w.a• Gww Yim b w, u N.aisJ we d.n�sea "°, b MbaeE M 14rbae u Ue 10 U, The PatU, TIY bL >ne WB .we Y W Iwb(b r: W 4 4nENP b'a W .a¢em. Yd ...Ab d W pblb IMV b➢ o o -umt,, r \n41d flat tM oti.m mA d1uptlru of Wa l,dnlma 0,11 omRl- am G� !^a\ipp ,1,L fte lmi ao ao to Mod 6N bebmfa ttylr x op.Mi, � W WRY F9 N'111IILV r W \.nb bmn b,e Rrsld N.r m.eN. b 4 oNUeE b d.pnb u d W dy W SOOiaSHH tACIYIC TRANSPORTATION CM Of kAOmo COCANOSCA, CONPASY, aT e 'L e T Atuat, Kai'or AaAlatant Sn¢etary Clerk. EXHIBIT 'A• An easement for road, drainage, 6110 public utility purposes, over, under along, through and acre ;s the rea, property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, Statn, of California, described as follows A strip of land of irreguidr width being a portion of the South one -half of Lots 4 and 10. Block 8, of the Tra't of Land of the Cucamonga Ho%ostead Assorlatlon as per map recorded on page 46 in Book 6 of baps, in the Office of he County Recoroer of San Bernardino County, said strip being more ,articularly described as being all that portion of the South one -half of Lo's 4 Ind 10 lying Southerly of a lire parallel to and 40 feet Northerly of the foliccaing described surveyed center line of the (Pacific Electri, Railway) .,�thern Pacific ' ransportation Company riqht -of -way: Farce' A Ite Beginning at :nglneer's Station 'qOB +84.79 of said surveyed center line of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's right of way distant Northerly .1 jO feet, more or less, from the Southwest corner of said Lot 10, said station toing to the Viest line of the South one -half of said Lot 10, thence from this Point of Beginning. North 88'52'30' East, 104 feet to Engineer's Station 2900 +88.79 of said surveyed center line of the southern Pacific Transportation Company'; right of way, being a point in a line perpendicular to said center line, said perpendicular line intersects the South line of Lot 10, a distance of 42.65 feet Southerly, more or less, and interasEs- a line parallel Ind 40 feet Northerly of said surveyed center line of Southern Pacific Transportation Company's right of way, said perpendicular line being the Easterly term!nus of this easement. Contains 0.197 acre, more or lc!s. Page 1 of 2 /// V .. Parcel B Beginning at Engineer's Station 2908 +84.79 of said surveyed center line of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's right of way, distant Northerly 41.30 feet, more or less, from the Southwest corner of said Lot 10, said station being in the West line of the South one -half of said Lot 10; thence from this Point of Beginning. South 88'52'30" Nest, 4 feet to Engineer's Station 2098 +80.79 of said surveyed center line of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's right of way being a point in a line perpendicular to said center line, saidperpendicular line intersects the South line of Lot 4, a dista.ice of 40 feet Southerly, more or less and intersect.- a line parallel to and 40 feet Northerly of said surveyed center line of Southern Pacific Transportation Company's right of way, said perpendicular line being the Westerly terminus of this easement. T� Contains 0.007 acre, more or less. Page 2 of 2 117 RESOLUTION NO. x4s-- c`reCTa T - 151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIE CT1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND THE C17Y OF RANCHO CUCENONGA FOR THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE RAILROAD CROSSING (NO. BBO- 522.90) WIDENING NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as •City), has for its consideration a Grant of Easement for roadway and related purposes to be executed by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (hereinafter referred to as "Company'), for the widening of Archibald Avenue at the Company's railroad crossing (No. BBO- 522.90) located north of Base Line Road; WHEREAS, the Company is willing to grant said easement for the purpose of widening said Archibald Avenue located at the Company's said railroad crossing; WHEREAS. the Compawwill execute said easement for roadway and Ty. related purposes subsequent to the City's approval and acceptance of said easement; and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to construct said widening of Archibald Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, chat said Grant of Easement be hereby approved and accepted, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same, and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this resolution to the duplicate counterparts of said Easement Agreement and mail said counterparts to the Southern Pacific Transporation Company for execution and subsequent recordation in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. CITY OF SANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Hay 21, 1986 TO: City Council and City Maneger FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enginter BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Eagineer "Ira I':. SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SEEK BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT Oi nRrvi5AL0 AVENUE SIDEWALKS FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO BASE LINE The plans and specifications for the said project have been substantially completed, therefore, at this time, the Engineering Division requests permission to seek bids 1p r_ construction. It is planned to fund this project. free the Beautification d and Transportation Development Act (TOA1, Articles 3, from the San Bernardino Associated Governments. The Engineer's Estimate for this project is $103,553.OD RECOMENDATION: It is recommended that Clty Council grant approvdl to seek s or a mpruvement of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line and to fund this project from the Beautificatioi. Fund and TOA, Article 3 based on the Engineer's Estivate of $103,553.00. Res tfully su it ed LBW: :ko Attachments //9 RESOLUTION NO. g(p —15c), A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANLWGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'ARCHIJALD AVENUE SIDEWALKS', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AHD DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE 80S. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spclfications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for *Archibald Avenue Sidewalks' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 1s hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required bi law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified to the aforesaid plans and a specifications, which saidNdverti�ement shall be substantially in the ' following words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2 :00 o'clock D.N. on the 11th day of June, 1986, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Archibald Avenue Sidewalks' to said City Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made an a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamorga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks' PREVAILING WAGE: Notice 1s hereby given that in accordance with the Provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality In which the public work is perform-d, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any tn:erested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site /aa CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ARCHIBALD AVENUE SIDEMA!f,S HAY 21, 1986 PAGE 2 The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) fo- each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic Is paid less than the general prevAiling rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attach:d contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777 5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council. properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as,Wtided, requires the Contractor or subcontractor z� employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and wh;ch administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certlficate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship comm/ttee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its member<hip through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0 When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ARCHIBALD AVENUE SIDEVALKS HAY 21, 1966 PAGE 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices Eight 8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under hero shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to oo with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. a Contractor agrees to pa travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed y to execute the work required by this contract as sucn travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%, of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the lar bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if smy, skiali he retuned Lo the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to oe given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall he c,ie hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additicnol bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (502) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. CITY COUNCIL RESOLMON ARCHIBALD AVENUE SIDEWALKS HAY 21, 1966 PAGE 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contra:tor who is not licensed in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law ;California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq ) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has rat been issued by Use City of Rancho Cucamonga. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of he City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 932] 9ase Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specitications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $20.00, said $20.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be walled when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreiebursable payment of $5.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidde. will be required to enter int, a contract satisfactory to the City of4anc he Cucamonga, arm. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calirornia, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. /�3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 198E TO City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engireer SUBJECT: Approval to Seek Bids for Base ine Sidc4alk Improvement, North Side from 600 Feet East to 1301. "-_t East of Hermosa Avenue The plans and specifications for said project have been substantially completed, therefore, at this t;me, the Engineering Division requests permission to seek bids faw Construction. It is planned to fund this project fromthe Beautification Fund; the Engineer's Estimate for tnis project is $13,100 00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving plans and specifications for the Base Line Sidewalk Improvement from 600 feet East to 1300 feet East of Hermosa Avenue and authhoriting and directing the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids and to fund this project from the Beautification Fund based oil an Engineer's Estimate of $13,300.00. Re�fully submltt d, ` 4 LBH:L :bc Attachments RESOLUTION N0, 49&41� 74 — I$3 A RESCLUYION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'BASE LINE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the Intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to zonstruct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamouga WHEREAS, the City of Rancha Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spclfications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and speclftcalions for "Base Line Sidewalk Improvement'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk Is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the Wrk specified In the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said— advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 6th day of June 1906, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Base Line Sldewa7k7mprovement -Tn said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediete,y in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 base Line Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Bse Line Sidewalk Improvement'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of Lalifornia Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article, 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per them wages for work of a similar chararter in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,lob site. / t) 5— The Contractor shall forfeit, is pensalty to the City of Rancho -. Cucamonga, twenty -five dollare ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such latorer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Cortractor or any subcontractor ander him. Section 1777 S. as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the 'apprenticeship program in that trade for a ? certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent it, the SO days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less that one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the adm.nistration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any appren`iceable trade on such, contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements iaay be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. /c;�6 Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all ard any 1. with and be governed by tAa lass of the - wor:men employed in the execution of -his contract and the Cforthcinr Division subcontractor under him shall to do with vnrking pours as set State of California r having Article 3 or the Labor Code of the State of California 2, Part 7, as am ^nded. as a penally to the City of RLUho five donors (524.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic The Contractor shall forfeit, him or any subcontractor •order Cucamonga, Lwenty- du'1 ^9 ion Of the for each calendar day labor employed is thoef the uwo k here rgenttoned, permitted to him. upon any workman, or mechanic is required e. P said laborer, morehthan eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to Pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed istence this contract as such travel agreements subs Piled to execute the work required by lcable collective bargaining payments are defined in the apD in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8• certified cashier's check, ctsh, ble to the City of Rancho can for an varan The bidder must submit proposal tee aith his check, or bidder's bond, day, S) of the amount of said bed as a g equal to at least ten perce Into contract if the same is awarded that the bidder will enter into the proposed rn erty of the SUC to him, and in event rtified checke or be shallo become the rp •tp said cash. cashier's check. City of Rancho Cucamonga. the of Rancho Cucamonga aaards r :a ^ ontract to the next lowest applied by if the Litt bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's sceurety shall be PP lus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the Burp performance of the The amount of the bond to be given to secureercentt(100%) of the contract percent contract for said work shall be one hundred D given to secure the payment price thereof, and an rdditional d work in an amount equal ec fifty pa of the contract price for said lies furnished for the performance of the (SOS) materials or suDP or any work or labor of any of claims for any the Contractor, work contracted to be done by aired to furnish ancH certificate be done thereon, and the Cootrctor will also e r to ees upo be entered into between him and the said City of that he carries compensation Insurance covering his imp done under contract which ons i Rancho Cucamonga for the constructon of said work in California No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is ^ and 11lulls dand accordance with the provisions of he Contr7000r'et Li seq•) Law Code, form has not been Business and Profession thereto or to whom a proposal regulattans adopted p issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga rofilas, plans, and The work is to be done in accordance with the n theO Copies of } specifications of the Ctty of Rancho a rho �ucamonga,le California the Office of tha City Clerk at 9320 Base LSne Road, a lication to the City of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon pP y.l • a Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $15.00, said $15.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, cople, of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated a.,ovo, together with an additional noureimburs ble payment of $5.00 to cove- the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Sec•ion 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upoi the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's We cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of spar , 19 -?r- p i L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAJONGA STAFF REPORT OA-E: May 21, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroutil, Senicr Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO 1985 -.,° HOUSING REPAIR /REHABILITATION L ON SAN BER'IAROIN UN Attached herewith is an amendment to the 198: -86 Housinr Repair /Rehabilitation '%n Contract wita San Berne-24no County. The City is contracting with the County for its housing repair and rehabilitation services. This amendment is necessary for :he County to continue otr Housing Repair / Rehabilitation Loan Progrma through the end of this fiscal year. The program funding in based on past Block Grant allocations Previcusly approved by the City Council. R°COMMMATION Staff recome-nds the City Council approve the proposed dnendrotnt to the 1985 -86' Housing Repair /Rehabilitation Loan Contract Witt, Safi Bernardi g6 County. , Respec ly" submttt:'ed, AV Av 11 N r CONTRACT THIS AGREMENT amends the agreement made aid entered into the 1st day of July, 1985, by and between the COUNTY OF SAN SERIVIMINO (hereinafter referred to as 'COUNTY') and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and known as County Contract 85 -1.56. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, both COUNTY and CITY are eligible to apply for grants from the United States Department of Housing and Urbnm Oevelopment, pursuant to the provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and WHEREAS, both COUNTY and CITY have been approved for funding in the fo.w of a Community Development Block Grant under Title I u0 the Housing and Cacunity Development Act of 1974, for the program year teglnning July 1, 1985, and ending June 30, I� and �& wnlMSAS, both COUNTY and CITY have each developed a community development plan pursuant to Title I of the Act that includes a Housing Program that will help meet the housing assis•ance needs of lower income persons residing in their respnctive jurisdittton:; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Community Development (hereinafter referred to as OHM% is the COUNTY entity responsible :or +mdministering the Federal Community Development Block Grant Contract and CITY desire to coordinate their efforts to maximize utilization of personnel and resources and increase the efficiency and economics in administering their Housing Assistance Program. NM, THEREFORE, COUNTY AND CITY for and in consideration of tie mutual promises and agreements herein contained Jo agree as follows: 1. The purpose of this Agreement is to utilize HM's repair crews to make repair.c on and for Rancho Cucamonga senior and handicapped and disabled homeowners as part of the CITY's Housing Program. 2. The CITY hereby authorizes thb COUNTY to utilize and assume responsibilit for COUNTY work crews to accomplish essential repairs on housing units of homeowners in the CITY of Rancho Cucamonga who al•fy for Senior Repair grants under the CITY'c Community Development Block Grant program guidelines as administered by the COUNTY. 3. a. COUNTY shall act as the agent for the CITY in all matters related to assessing, estimating, assigning, and effecting all repair work to be conducted as part of the CITY's Senior Home Rcpair Program and Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. a , i, b. Each party agrees to Indemnify, defend and save harmless the other psrty from any and all claims, losses, and damages occurring or •- agents,norfrom employees in to perform performance of this contract. ion of its officers, c. The COUNTY Shall demands, aandy'actionsldincurred CITY CITY against as a any liability f dot claims, result of determination by the United States Depa:taent of Housing and Urban Development that activities undertaken by County under the program or programs that any fund lbilled byyandudl5 burrssedttontherCountylunderpthisbAgrteeent were improperly expended. 4. The terms of this Agreement shall became effective n the date force and Junae30,d1996 oreuntiill conclusion of the program; to any event either COUHtTlYoar Citlrttt� notice this program relationship by giving the o er p termination is to take effect. calendar days before S. a. COUNTY agreesy4 process to completion a minimum of nine s� (9) Housing Rehabilitation loans. b. COUNTY agrees to perform all necessary work to complete five (25) as previously agreed (35) (in twenty upon) Senior rhirt Repair grants. c. COUNTY administrative costs shall not exceed 25% of the include but not necessarily pro ram funding. Administrative costs shall and loan processing, legal fees, title reports and Housing limited to. grant c exceed shall administrative O supplies. In Repair grant. $1,500 per li loan and d. COUNTY and CITY declare that all work performed In total of $116,000 (in lieu accordance with this Agreement shall not exceed a work of vvitiesthlsReasonable Consist pa. vRepair agreed nd Rehabilitation which is to shall the Loan efforts will regular on the Senior °assurance,das deferred and formal well Home Repair Program. 6. CITY shall assume sole responsibility for planning and for the printing and implementing l outreach vi t es and efforts and on a en m dissemination llaenl5. pond 7. a. NCO shallicatlons received, tmonthlyerstatements oftt performed. the number of app been to be monthly for purposes of reporting tor HUDhas chompletederis provided b. At the close of each quarter of the Du year. COUNTY shall bill CITY for costs incurred during that quarter, pursuant of this Agreement. /R B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by any party for any reason. COUNTY shall be paid by CITY for all services rendered on the basis of the percentage of work completed on the date notice of termination is given, and except for the obligations described in Paragraph 3b and .',m of this Agreement, neither party shall have any further obligation umler this Agreement. 9. CITY and COUNTY hereby agree to meet in an informal meeting to resolve all disputes arising out of or relating to this Agrrtmnt or the breach thereof. 10. CITY and COUNTY hereby agree that the employees hired to work in the repair program described herein will great the minimum standards currently squired in the COUNTY's Housing Program. 11. All information obtained from or about the participant shall be used solely for the purposes of this Program and for dateraining eligibility. The names of participating individuals and all information obtained from or about LDewtmdil be held in absolute confiJenco by the CITY �9- and the Department of Housing and Coaaunity Development mM its employees. Any infornation requested by other County departments, State, lccal, or federal agencies which would permit the identification of a participant or 41s /her address will be granted only upon receipt of r written permission from the program participant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the governing bodies of the parties hereto have authorized this Agreement and have caused the said Agreement to be executed as of the date hereof. By By . - -mayor Chalman. Board of pery sors ATTEST: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Alan K. Marks COUNTY COUNSEL By: City Attorney Deputy County unse Daced: ,z 13 -DL �.`is.'� w4 .i • i•.Yi. 'tla� .w.... '. - ti `. ..-. , _ F.v. S:ni%.� .' r �r u r pr'i ,rt ATTACHMENT 91 Program Expenditures Total City Program Expenditures $116,000 Program Expenditures by Percentage and Dollars a) Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program 50% of $116,000 - $58,000 b) Senior Repair 2i,)gram 50% of $116,000 • ;58,000 � - � : •. HP2 -RC AMENDMENT I r .:w y r � v:'Jl �' v vyT•�y {P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 1986 T0: city Council and City Hanager FROKS Mark R. Lorinnr, Administrative Aoalyat yf,& 14 The Vest Valley Van for Control District has drafted the attached agreement for the City's approval in contracting for vector control services. The agreement provides for all tbose serricos desired by the City Council, including the District's responsibility for astablisbing baited fly traps, relecoing 5.000,000 cbalcids, applying residual sprays and implementing on education program within the City. Am part of the agreement, the Vest Valley Vector Control District will preside a full -time vector biologist to address the fly coatrol within the City limits only. District earyloyae(s) will maintain office hours at�iR Hall, Monday through lridq, between the hours 8 :00 and 9:00 a.n. and x-00 end 5:00 p.m. to respond to may citizen inquiries and complaints. The District personnel will routinely inspect residential and commercial areas as well as poultry ranches and stable areas. The District will also be responsible for issuing correction and abatement notices as necessary to abate fly breeding conditions, and pe.gonna, will investigate and maintaiu a log of fly complaints by Rancho Cucamonga citizens. As tine permits, the vector biologist will present information to schools on current fly control measures and instruct individuals and groups in specific rsuidences. The annual cost for the service will not exceed 677,000. The agreement will become effective on June 2, 1986 and extends tbrosgb December 51, 1987. The sgreenent will be automatically extended beyond that date unless terminated or amended by either party. The agreement has been reviewed _y staff and the City Attorney. It addresses all those concerns expressed by the City Council and provides for the implementation of a successful vector control program within the City. It is recommaudod that the City Council approve the agreement with the Nest Valley Vent" Control District for vector control services in Reecho Cucamonga. Should you wish any additional infcrmatien regarding thin attar, please contact me at your convenience. MRL /dja Attached /3y Y. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 1986 TOi City Council and City Manager TROMS Debbie Adams, Deputy City Clark SUBJECT: VECTOR CONTROL ACREIXCIT The agreement with Nut Tal1ju eetor Control District van no: available at the time the agenda vas copi #Z" It will be available for you an Moaday, May 19, 1986. /do r r� THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the West Valley Vector Control District, ., hereinafter called the District, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter called City, on the second day of June, 1986- W I T N E S S a T H WHEREAS, District was created to provide effective and efficient vector control strategies to protect and anhance the quality of life in the West San Bernardino Valley; and WHEREAS, District is a body corporate and poiitic and a • public agcy of the state empowered, to make crvxtracts, employ staff, and perform all du 106 CaalifornlanHeaitht and Safety Code, a delegated or allowed by _• Division 3, Chapter 6, Sertion 2200 ex• seq•j end WHEREAS. City desires to provide vector control to its incorporated area; and desires to enter into an agreement with WHEREAS, City District for fly control within the City; and provide the WHEREAS, District has the capability to p necessary supporting functions, material, equipment and perritrolil to carry opt the present and ongoing functiono of fly and '& WHEREAS, City and District will mutually benefit by such an agrerment: NOW, 7HEREcORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 3 A. District shall: 1, Provide to City all necessary services, supplies, equipment and amployeo(s) to carry out Provisions of qthis agreement as requested and approved by the City Council. .. • 2• Assign said empl ayee(s) to specifically n parf ors the work and cervices provided herein for the City. Such �_• k ^+:.aL7+'Ti;:Y:. x+. .. `•r ` ..x. vd f /� � - "r':'1%.a � y "X�N: • employee(s) shall be undbr the direction of the Dis• tanager " as designated by the District Board of Tr•istees. 3. Establish a separate accountL-g n •.ar this Fly Control Program and make quarterly reports to City Upon reasonable notice to the District, City shall be untitled to inspect the books and records pertaining to the agreement during normal business hnurs. 4. Surveillance a. District will establish baited fly traps of Its own design to objectively x4nitor fly populatici on a weekly basis during the contract. b. Monitor degree -day temperatures to predict fly emargance dates. C. Inspect existing commercial poultry -•.fP ranches an a monthly schedule and /or more frequently as needed. d. Maintain records of complaints, fly surveys, inspections and central. Reports shall be submitted to City on a monthly basis. e. Inspect backyard farm /animal activities and stables as identified and an a complaint basis. 5. Education. District shall provide the following services an time permits& a. Instruct individuals and groups on current fly control measures around the home. b. Present information to schools and classac on current fly control measures. r. Prepare media information of cormunity and specific fly control progress. Information to be approved by City prior to media release 6. Compliance a. Issue correction and abatement notices as neces,iary to abate fly breeding conditions. n b. Investigate and maintain a log of fly ••FJ complaints by citizens. - .• 7. Control 0N.. a. Release approximately five niilicn J z' Chalcids for biological control of fly larvae and pupae i)i' selected areas. b. Apply residual adulticidus and non - residual aerosol adulticides on an emergency basia to prevent dispersal or control local fly outbreaks as determined by district. C. Apply residual fly spra`r to trash dumpstera in commercial areas once per month during the months of June, July, Augist and September. S. Thu District shall use California Health and Safety Coda, Div lion 31 Chapter S. Section 2200 et, saq, in the administration of the fly control program in the absence of action by the City to adopt an ordinance regulating fly breeding. All fees, fines or liogspcollected by District pursuant to the s� above code shall be retained by District/ 9. The District shall L respond to ��rryaaod���e��nA�t complaints on an as needed basis. �W)dxat V.CC�ttol) 'tji& d' 10. Throughout the1 term of this Agreement, at District s solo cost and expense, District shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for t1ce mutual benefit of City and District, comprehenniva, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal InJury, death, or property damage arising from District's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) fo- bodily in)ury or death to any one person or for any ono accident or occurrence and at least One Million rallars (519000,000.00) for property damage. All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in roeponsible insurance companies licensed to do business In the State of California and policies required herein and shall name as additional insureds City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect than (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against City,and City's elected officials, officars, employees, rid agental (2) the policies are primry and noncontributing 6 , any insurance t; r 13fc�, r�. t ,r� e f that may be carried by City) and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty f30) days' notice by the insurer to City by certified mail. District shall furnish City with copies of all such polic.as promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. District may affect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 11. District shall hold harmless City from any and all claims or court actions of whatsoever kind or nature for damage to property or personal injury. including death, which may arise from any act carried on under this agreement by District's Officers, employees, agents or representatives. This hold harmless shall Include legal representation in court. R. City shells q�' 1. Pay for aid receive the rights and benefits of all services rendered by Dz %trict, including thong activities specified under Paragraph A of this agreement and such other apreoments as necessary between the District and City. 2. City egress to pay the cost of this service upon quarterly billings by district not to exceed $3!,720 per year. This cost is to include, a. Hourly labor charges paid by District to employees for salaries and benefits properly chargeable to this agreement. b. The cost of pesticides and biological control .•gents at District cost. C. The cost of vehicle travel at 21 cents Dsr -S- mile. d. The cost of printing educational materials. e. Provide District employee office space and telephone service in City facilAtios. 3. City shall hold harmless District from any and all , claims or court actions of whatsoever kind or nature for damage ) to property or personal injury, including death which say arise- - from any act carried an pursuant to Paragraph B3 this sigrsement -- by City's officers, employees, agents or representativds. This,,,,' ++al:.nM1'.._•is�'C. >�.lAfr-Wi% t- e' hold harmless shall include legal representation in court. C. City and District Jointly agree: 1. Either party may terminate this agreement with or without cause at any time by giving 60 days written noticd to the other party of such termination ano specifying the effectivo data of such termination. In ti t event, all finished or unf,nished documents and other materials completed under an audit shall become the sale and exclusive property of the District. If the agreement is terminated by City as provided herein, the District shall be paid actual progress expenses, or proportion thereof if final period is less than a. full month, payable as provided heroin through the date of such termination. 2. City mayskg required from time to time to modify the scope of the services of District to be performed hereunder, Including, but rat limited to, increasing the number of applicaticna or treatments or modifications of the contract period. Such modifications shall cause an appropriate Increase or decrease in the amount of the Diatrict's compensation and changes in the term of this agreement, and when mutually agreed upon by and between the A strict and City, shall be effective when Incorporated in written amendments to this agreement. 3. This agreement shall be effective on June 2, 1966, and shall remain in effect until terminated. IN WITNESS WHOZEOF, the parties hereto have caused their respective names to be hereunto subscribed xnd their respective seals to be hereunto affixed by their respective proper officers thereunto duly authorized. i, C fE -.°+in4t ✓.@�h^ ? 1L+?7LJ�.Y .?'S.v�^± .. .i. .; .. .. _'. U' 1 District President, Board of Trustees West valley VCD k 1 .A General Manager Aparovad as to Form Dato_—� Bruce Lance, Jr. District Counsel City t Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clark Approved as to Form= Date — City Attorney . S q the MP- •, i 34 •_ . _y.rar.»' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �i a STAFF REPORT c . 0 A Z 14n � DATE: May 21, 1986 TO: C.ty Council and City Manager FROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Joiry R. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Acquisition o£ an International Business Machine's Advanced Technologv Microcomputer and Peripheral Equipment. D2UIPMENTs The International Business Machine's Advanced Technology microcomputer with Irma Board, modem connect, Sysdyne EGA Subsystem, 5128 random access memory, and a 30 MB hard disk San Cut m 1 iBernardino County's Assessoroofficeo to , nHall ofcRecorusj and Tax Collector's computer files. Additionally, this system will provide the City the ability to perform indepth assessment district analysis, comprehensive seas : ;aaant projections, address Rancho Cucamonga's citizens assessment inquiries, collect delinquent assessments, monitor revenues and expenditures, perform complex assessment research projects. rectify erroneous assessments, generate a comprehen- sive quarterly assessment report and reduce assessment consultant ecnoong $818008 breakdown ofosts fr the equip ent totaling 00 RECOMMENDATION• Staff request approval to acquire the International Business Machine's Advanced Technology Microcomputer and peripheral equipment. Amount not to exceed $8,800.00 Re pectfully Submitted* r Rizzo *�1• obert • y' Assistant City !tanager .k. RR :JBF:kmm ;S Prioo quotation valid for 30 data from' Computerlu d of Upland 916 N. (714)948-4774788 Proposal prepared by Michael Moron City of Rancho Cucamonga svenue Dept. 932o Baseline core CA 81730 �11 Rancho Cucam 989 -1851 _ .. Item ___ _ Unit ______________ _ -- - ---.00 _____ quan ----------------------- ______ _____ IBM 90 MHO. R.D. 1 113M PC /AT 5128 RAM' $780.00 5ER /PAR ADAPTER 1 9Y9DYN8 80A IUB9N /TCAB� Up 7475A $1r590.00 $624.00 1 SIX PEN PLO N/ CABLE %L $575.00 1 IBM PROPRINTER BUNDLE WORD, C11ART. PLAN $760 00 • 1 MICROSOFT 1 IRMA BOARD MODEM CO"ECT $8,354.00 $501.24 SUBTOTAL $8,855.24 TAX TOTAL 'Terri• , µaunnin�Uw'',UP� d'•CA 917a8.17141945 Ole -%L- n � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager PROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: SU..qJECT2 Jerry B. Pulwood; Assessment Revenue Coordinator EVALUATION: Assessment District 85 P.D. was formed in fiscal year 1985/06, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Its boundaries encompasses -' over 20,000 parcels. The assessment foi fiscal year 1985/86 per single dwelling unit on 1.5 acres or less was $34.65. Fiscal year 1986/87 projected assessment per single dwelling unit on 1.5 acres or leas is $33.501 this represents a $1.15 assessment decrease over fiscal year 1985/86. An analysis is provided in the attached Engineer's Report. The following Resolutions are provided for Council's approvals: 1) The Resolution Initiating Proceedings and Ordering Engineor's Report. 2) Resolution Approving Engineer's Report. 3) Resolution Declaring Intention to Provide for an Levy and Collection of Assessments. Additionally, this Resolution will set the Public Hearing for June 4, 1986, and provide for Special Bond Counsel Professional Pees not to exceed $500. RECOMMENDATION: S%aff request Council's approval of Resolution Initiating _ 137 Yroceedinga and Ordering Engineer's Report, Resolution •? Approving Engineer's Report and Resolution Declaring intention to Provide for an•Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments, and set time and place for Public Hearing fcr f•' June 4, 1986. t R spso idly Sj tt r ' 4+ obert Rizzo ` Assistant City Manager _ c• RR=JBPtkmm T. l , Tp i Y ,A d f q r f a� �e iS 'r. 'S ��Y•��, ,,,y �. .� .7.53,. �. /38 'S_ it n RESOLUTION ND. RECQATION Or TEE CITT COUNCIL ON TIE Clrr OF RANCRO CUCAMONCA. CALIFORNIA, ENITIATINC PROCE®DPCS FnR TEE ANNUAL IN" OF ASSUSMENTS AND ORDERING TEE PREPARATION OF AN ISCINRER'S "REPORT"" FOR A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WLZREAS, the CITT COUNCIL of the CITY Of RANCID WCAMONCA. CALII'OENIA, has previously forged a vpeciol ssussmsst district parauat to the terse of the "Landscaping tad Lighting Act of 19120, boles Division 15, Part 2 of the Street& aad kighways Code of the State of California, In vkat is known and designated as PAU AND RECREATION IMMS NENT DISTRICT (0MV59E AND RED BILL COMMUNITY PARE) (hereinafter referred to an the "Asessomaat District"); and WHEREAS, at tbiar'tir the City Council is desirous to take 'ar proceedings to Provide for the annual levy of usesseent• for the Sort evening fiscal year to provide for the costa and =pass** necessary to pay debt service on the hoods issued and costa for annual msiutanance fee the Asssasa.at District. NW, THEREFOIU. IT 1E army ELDLPRD As rOLLWSs SICTION 1, That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2, That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this lesi6lative body to initiate proceedings for the ao*esl levy and collection of special asse assents for the payrst of debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction of the misting improvnuents and annual neintanavce vithin the Assessment District. No new improremauts nor any substantial chooses in existing isproveeents are proposed as a part of thou proceedings. SECTION 3. That this improvement to bereby referred to W2LLDAN ASSOCIATES, the appointed Engineer of Work, who is hereby directed to Make and file the "Report" generally tostaiaing the followings 1. Plans and specifications describing the several *store, location and anent of the existing improvasentsy /3Y 0 ATTEST, Beverly A. Authelet. City Clark Jeffrey Ring. Mayor N 2. An estivate of the costs of the imprev""to for the Lesesores Diotrict for the rsfereseed fiscal year, , ' iaelwdimg tie tesesl imstallnest aLaessuest necessary x' to pay debt service ea the loads and costs of vaintesancet ,. I. A diagram for tbo Assasment District, sbwlmg the ., ores and properties proposed to be assessed= 4. As aesessmest of the estimated coots of the improvements, asesesieg the not lowest upon all aesassable lots aadlor parcels within the Assessment District is pvopertioa to the beesfits received. . Tbat mpoa completion of the preparation of said "Rdport ". he filed vith the City Clark, vbo shall the ocigival shall tbn submit tba same to this legislative body for its immediate reviw cad consideration. 9TnCIL led! ibova "port" sball include 911 costs asd -%K,, ,[trio A, That t� As Jail 1. 1986, and @.Ain& Jase npaases relatieg to the fiscal year eomvameieg 70, 1987. CMBEL UaTI RPVCTA.. SICIIii: +, That the Spacial Coan al Agreement for legal smites cad authorised for submitted by p. Mackenzie gross, Inc. is hereby approved ` execution. 9ASSla1, AMOVED, and ADOfYBD this * day cf *, 19s. ATESi 8099, ABSIS73 ATTEST, Beverly A. Authelet. City Clark Jeffrey Ring. Mayor W�z'' I uEOLMM ■0. 8lr'I55 RESOLUTION OF Tag CITT COUNCIL W T91 CIa Or IANCIO CUCAMONGA. CALIEOENSA, A9f[OWnr TRR WGINIW8 "RRORr E01 MOCNCDDCR TOR TO ANNUAL LEFT OF ASSENgrENa VITA N ASSESSMENT DISTRICT VMMUS, the OITr COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALI90ENIA, pursuant to the provisioas of the "Landscaping aid Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Division 15, part 2 of the Streets ad Highways Code of the State of California, did, by previous Rasolatiea, propose to initiate proceedings and ordered the preparation if as Lginear's "Report" for the amnasl levy of assessments within a ayerial assessment district, said assessment district know and designaWd as TAR AND RECREATION INFRAODOT TISMICr (RMTPGX A,ND lID RILL CO=XITr EAR) (bereimafter referred to as 4VAseassmeat District')( and =74AS, there has saw be" presented to this City Cowell the "Repart" as required by said Division 15 of the Street@ and Rigbways Cole and as previously directed by Resolution{ and VS MM. this City Council has oar carefully vtaind and reviewed, the "Report" as presented. and is satisfied with each sad 4111 of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that Nee •sseasmeats, on a preliminary basis, bars been spread in scordance with the benefits received from the =toting wcrka of imprvemeutq a at forth in said "Report". NW, TgRQOR, IT 10 RECENT RESOLVED AS TOLLWf.m SLGIIis1s That the above recitals are all true and correct. RMIU id, That tha "Report" as preserteds consisting of the follovingm A. Flans and specifications describing the guard nature, location and anent of the existing improvements. E. Estimate of cost. including the amount M_ the anneal installment for the forthcoming fiscal year. C. Diagram of tba District. D. Assessment of the estimated cost is hereby approved on a preliminary basis, and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clark as a permanast record and to remain open to public inspection. t 7, .'a t1 SMIi;.11 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage end adoption of this Rasolution,-act the aduntes of this meesimg shall so reflect the presentation of the ptieeer's *Report". YASRRD, Ap1109t. end ADO?= this * day of *, 19a. AYES, r Roast A7EYYt C( " Jaffrey Ring, Rgor s AYTERTt Rmrly A. 6uthelet, City Clark is I, SETARLY A. ADTRELEY, CITY CLmm of the Ciq of Reecho C■caamngs. z California, do hereby certify that the foregoing :evolution ues duly passed approved. sad adopted by the City Council of the City of Raacho Cucamonga, California, at a regular (spatial, adjourned) 'mating of acid City Council held '- on the a day of Ezecutd this a day of +, 19+* at Rancho Cucatmnga. California. a .1 Beverly A. Autbale t, City 91erk .. �1 'i2 Rggcconam RD. 53 (e -1 37 WCAdCA, CALLIFORNIA' Dl�CLUM ITR'NTMT1CCI TWO F&QID% Sp 'CIAAL ASSRnSMWSWDlsTtIR LAND sxrr C A TTemuYD n.ACi FOR PUBLIC RZARIW TIRRI N Van", the CITT COUNCIL of the CITT OF RACRO CUCAVONOA, CALIFOYIA, has Previously formed a Special assessment bsl district Pursuant tottkl terms ra the %ardscapint aad Liglt(ag ial of of the Streets aad 11%bways Code of tls state of California. in what is know& and dasigeatcd If pAM AID RW&gjTIW UnCTINOT DIRTIICT (RI urn AND IRS HILL CONNONITT FAIL) (heraivaf ter referred to as tle eAsoaaament District".; and WRER . at tbi XIe the City Council is dedron• to Cake proceedings to provide for the sons, Is" of assessments for the most meaning fiscal year to provide for the costs and =page*@ seceesgry to p4 on the bonds i$sued and costs for Anson, uisteaace for the 4weuat District; And VRRRRdS, at tbis time there has been Presented and approved by this couuncil is desiroussOfncontinuingpwitb, thesproceedi is for said annualtlisvyCi City NW. TRMWOkN, IT IS Rn% T RRSOLTRD AS FOLLONSt RECITALS SICTIUN tt That the above recitals are all tree and Correct. near AUUM OF nMUM ARGIL& Tt That the public interest and dnndntake pro a requires, fand tit is the intention of this legislative body, annual levy and collection of asnessaents for the payment the Costa and =Pease: for Cthe aesirtowintisaselogtsaid ad improvements including debt service on Construction Yerks park including buttinotllimitedeto- land preparaitim Rend gill Couding. ether with including Grading, landscaping and irrigatios gates, tot appurtenant work. That no new improveauts or any substantial changes in &slating fapraveaants ate proposed as a part of these prorsedings. MIAMI r '/3 0 SIMON 31 That said works of iaprovamsat are of direct basefit to the properties witbin the bomadarie• of said Assessment District, which Assarameat District the legislative body previously declared to be the area benefited by said rocks of ipro►eisat, gad for Particulars refarescs is made to the boundary amp as previously approved by this legislatioe body, a coq of which is OR file in the Office Of the City Clark mad open for public inspection, gad designated by the news of this Assessment District. SECTION 44 That the "Imports et the Sejinser, as prelWnorily apprwed by this legislative body, is OR file with the City Clerk sad open for public iuRPettdoa. Retergace is made to laid "Report* for a tall and detailed description of the existing works of improverat, the boladries of the Assessomot District mad any roses tbnaia, gad the proposed aa/asaNate epos assessable lots and panels of load withla the Assessswat District. 910M91-1: ROTICS IS RnwCS9EN TILT WSDNSi0A7:, Tea 4TH DAL OL JUIS. 1986, AT THE NOUa OF 7170 O'CLOCK P.N.. 1] Lag Nit= PLACH OP TIE CITY COUNCIL AT LICCS PARK COMMITT COTBS. 9161 BASS LI•a ROAD, RANGED CUCAMONGA, CA. IS TIE TIER AND PLACE PAID BY T113 LCIBL.MTg BODY FOR Inswo PROTESTS 0R OBJECTIONS II RAKRENCE TO TIE ARIUAL LEST OP ASEENEMENTS AND TO ANY OTKS3 NATTERS CLNTAINSD IN 1019 RE90LUTION. ANY PERSONS WIO Visa TO ONJNCT TO Lag PROCEEDINGS OR THE ANNUAL LITY SNOUL0 NILE A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH TEN CITr MISS PRIOR TO TSE TINS SET 101 TIE PUBLIC WRING. SECTION 61 That the City Clark is hereby authorised and give notice as causing a copy 7f this Resolution to be published in RDORT, a nevspapar of gaesrvl circulation within said City= said to be completed not less thou can (10) days prior to the date as poblic hearing. SECTION 71 pot any and QI information relating to Proceedings. including .nforescion relating to Protest procedure, attention is directed to the parson designated belowt inn num. ASSISSEENT'. P. 0. Box 807 RMCN,O CUCAMONGA. CA 91130 TR.►IRLISt 014) 989 -183, t between the CITY OF RA1KM COCA ORNiA ( re nFf —,T it rifer Cr as 'tit , r _i eunicipal corporation, And F. IRCNEN IE SRO". INC. (ha vlanfter uferred to as >; ` •Cotosel•). �q WHEREAS, City Is considering further proceedings. 1ncl Wing the levy of annual assess. 't Bents in a previously forNCd Asusseo+t District under the tens and "tit"& of the •Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972•, Ming Division 15. Pat 2 of the Streets ard 4_. Highways Code of the State of Californial said afsetswent district designated as ' ^ PARR Alm RECREATION IKROYEHENr DISTRICT (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMIMMITT PARI() (hereinafter referred to as the •AssesseWt Dlatritt•)s and, i WHEREAS. prep at this f le City Is desirous of off" lying spalal sou lot to further assist in ' the said en tryyst docuaentt and to attar Wrfca as it relater to the proetedings /a old Msassraent OlstrlCt. r HOW, THEREFORE, IT IS KHM41LY AGREED NETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: .� oXCTION 1. That CIt does hereby egloy Cmmsel. and Counsel that parole the follow. ' ing sm cast A. Preparation of all resolutions. notices. affidavits and docusunts as wessal for the Proceedings; N. NaWrkonserWatinns to City and •tnrr Nectars of the staff or eomlii— ' tYts as it relates to the proceedings or anr• docusantation to be prepared. C. Attendance at certain eeetlngs, as required by staff and/or City, to allow tepleswmtation of procstdings. O. Any other attars espnssly requasted as it relates to the a al levy of the prctaedings for the referenced Assessawnt District, SECTION 2. City agrees that upon cooptetion of the services and the levy of the annual assttt►.1nt, Counsal shall be paid a fee far services based upon an hourly rate of 5100.00 per hour, not to exceed S500.00. Said fee is all due and - payable upon the final proceedings for the final levy. ` SECTION 3. This Agressent nay be terelnated at any t:m by 30 -days written notice floe either party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agmeaent on the day and yea ' - first above written. -CITY- CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOMR e ATTEST: i• U MACNi E .Y Ill ' �Y'.�Irr�Ilil "f "r , PT gl p,,la �J .. V. a � �!y('` (` � ♦ ':�j�)l!j,1+��yrsR�T SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT enured into this day of D 7 k r Date: To: From: By: ISubject: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Ray 21, 1986 City Council and City Marager Pill Holley, Director, Ccmvnity Services Department Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Sanitary sewer easement through Red Hill Cocmunity Park The California Retirement Villas (Villa Del Rey) has pending a development adjacent to Red Hill Community Park located in the northwest corner. They are requesting a sanitary sewer easeavint through the park. which would allow the developer to access an existing sewer line (see exhibits). discou aged. casement on based on facilities is normally following: 1. The Park has an existing sewer easement through the facility. 2. contract top install atheeline.usThisewillyavoid any possible coordination problems. 3. pipedvseclay and EIndemnifyathehCityeforeany maintenance problems. 4. Finally the developer has cooperated with the City by swapping land thereby ?ushing his development to the west. This alliviated a situation where the pork would have had a strip of now - usable land (see attached). Recommendation: Based on the above, it is recommended that City Council authorize staff to Districts through RedaHillntowunityi Park as shown oin Exhib Cucamonga County Water DL:ks "=.(•��.:.c�� Nj 't, /��' , , ;�V , {tea t 1 =) J 1 li f p. M.4C69 ' L�)+d P�.2 s48G�t=.sS o•E7. -•1 , a �(�-- o o .�a.oa• �n t� y °o W 7 2 0 J 1 li 1 _11 Jl 60 V ~I 60' i I� n y �, 0 F so A 1 I �I I �h �r yy �^ � C L. O C C �n ��a o o �n t� n 2 0 G'A lwl- R/w Z,"gr � � ww Y/ c ARD RVEA/i 1 _11 Jl 60 V ~I 60' i I� n y �, 0 F so A 1 I �I I �h �r yy �^ � C L. O C C r i s4 V A 2n font ride strip of land heinq A portion of Lot 1, Cuca►onga Vineyard +roct, Buhdivision "CO an per moo recorded In Book 21 of Naps, Page 67, R•cor0s of Ran Parnardimu County pavina the fellovinu centerU ne4 Beginning at the center line intersectAon of Basellnn Rued and Carnelian street as show on Parcel Map 4369 retarded •_. Parcel Map Book 49, Pages 46 4y( and 47, records of said County, thanes earth 89' 591 07• east along the canter line of Baseline Road 951.15 fast to a point being oo the northcrly projection of a line draw parallel with and 252.00 East (measured at right angles) p; easterly of the east lina,of Parcel 2 of saint Parcel Map 4069 thence mouth 00' ?+ 104 39' weat a long said parallel line 337..97 Laei to the True point of ,�- Beginning, thence earth 68' 571 44' out 236.19 feet, thence south 21: 021 161 ^+t, east 223.00 fast to Lila center of an existing sewer manhole Ming the terminus •� of said tenter line. e The sidelines of said 20 foaAySda strip are shot +nod and prolotgated as to begin at the line pu%llol v1 and 252.00 feet seat rly of the east line of said Parcel 2 of Pai:el Map 4869 and terminate • the westerly line of existing sever easement at said sever manhole. S i� t- n 1 1� EXHIBIT 'A' n �. : s y r 1.+ d. 3. 3'f, it EXHIBIT "B" f Y .V UITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT Date: May 21, 1986 To: City Council and City Manager From: 8111 Halley, Camunity Services Director By: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator Subject: Victoria Groves Park Concept Plan The second park construction obligaclon of the Victoria Plan caesamity will be due with the next phase development called Victoria Groves. The Groves concept was derived from a stand of seventy -four mature California Pepper Trees. The Victoria Community Plan (Appendix A) and the Area Development Plan (Appendix B) provide conceptual utilization of the trees in a six acre ( + / -) Neighborhood Park. The concept though, failed to evaluate the health and structural integrity of the trees in a propised park appl cation. Staff has been working with the William Lyon Company and their landscape architect, Morse Consulting Group, to develop working plans for the Victoria Groves Park Site. It was lrmediately identified that a plan could not be Aeveloped until the condition of the trees were known. To resolve the issue, the Lyon Company and City mutually agreed that in the best Interest of the park and the City the trees needed to be evaluated by a professional arborlst. San Knapp Tree Service, was selected based on his reputation N the field and his previous workings within the community. Mr. Knapp visually Inspected all the trees and physically tested seventeen of which he recommended seven that could be used in a park setting with relative safety.(See Appendix C) Based on the severity of Mr. Knapp's recommendation, a second opinion was commissioned. Golden Coat Environmental Services was contracted anu a fir. Tan Pehrsen from the firm evaluated the trees. Mr. Pehrson's report (Appendix G) concurred with Knapp's findings and identified five additional trees that with the guidelines established in his report, could also be preserved. ti r ' ' d Victoria Groves Park Concept May 8, 1986 Page 2 Based on the two reports, the conceptual plan as proposed in the Vieteria Area Development Plan cannot be accommodated with the existing trees. With rnis information known, the Morse Consulting Group was instructed to develop a plan with the following objections: 1. Incorporate the seven Pepper Trees the ardorist both agreed upon, into the ovnrall design concept; 2. Establish a planting theme that symbolizes the Historical Grove atmosphere in a current park format; 3. Pro.iee t focal Wture for the terminus of the Victoria Parkway, --V91 as ca.led for in Victoria Community Plan. 4. include all the amenities needed to establish a functional Neighborhood Fork, i.e. picnic facilities, play areas, restrooms, off street parking, ballfield, and hard court area. SUMMARY: (he above criteria were establisi.ea in the plan as shown in Appendix E. Because of the sensitive issue trees can generate and the severity of this recommendation, the Conceptual Fark Plan Design and review of the existing trees health has been presented to the Park Development, Planning aid Historic Commissions. All concurred with the design as proposed and understood the declining condition of the pelper trees negated any possible consideration of their use in a park setting. REOMMENOATIOR: It is recommended that City Council approve the Conceptual Onsign for Victoria Croy-it Park and authorize staff to work with the William Lyon Company to establish working drawings to construct the park. .r r i .'; �7 0-11 DUM I APpSNOIX A 4k ro r s� i r .1 f l.� I Tr•SE VILL4Gc OF VICTCFLA GROVES VILLAGE CY.A+4.4CTcR cha =actor el victoria Groves the c!SLL�n w"= to a earl--, -usa %=h c'_ a-= Tees in its deli The -a -k a-d lac` ity ca_:4 the =ss_er _ '- � el Victoria g =cve w _ll anrveu a v!aca- L' to -irus L kwLV . VILL 4G°_ ECG=o q�� a + hland N.i''iken, the Sauthe =a�- Tha V!' -.age is ard3oae_ by E_g , pacific 4a +'toad tracks, and Deer Creek. ELS` =ard are N.+_Ll.ken will be a= tarn= roads ard the village = asieential areas wi +2_1 be buffered L- the ncise and t:ald!c Co. these reads. The d= awing,ba' -ew is a t r_ical c= css- seetica o= ogesed for these :cads shewiag hex this eculd be a===211shed it an at _ active way. A wall �� at variest7-re ~el setback Las the road cutb, wit% a Linea: +,� Provide yL=ting b -oken by —11 Or ialcrsal t:se sasses w-_ p the racessasy acoustic• and visual Protection to create a pleasing and lunet4anal at= setacspe. pleat Material selection will asphasite draught tolerant ape^_'_es ard to cini3ite ir= igation. Im.....aY•.r..r. RAP, VLi'H :A: C,.i Cr•i�G44Y\ _T.�Y �f M. AREA pEVELOPMENT PLAN VIC ORIA ROVES Ranchc Cucamonga,Ca. n n VMMA Y N i A- I r /i:• w•.��Y.1��. �. r,�r _-1pAa War Jqr .��w•.� -r �� r...r.r.i+ . . �r • JRr ��.��.�. JMrr u.w�wrwwwr N,. APPENDIX B t" .� �� •�i�rr "��� h' A - I v �� �• �'�'� .z �• .. � .� /gyp A .,�: Ise COD r� c•1wi ,' r; 'it 4 Al. t- li'.•e . i. -1: y_V_ wf. ' :.1' ... • • _ • 1R yl�w.V^"�,'\,y). ` :.r �{,: '•: n�- .:LrYiii�'•.L��w.�•��v,�;.± �1•..:.< =G V•t'- ��r%•%•.a.�. -;�• � •R (i�.,,ri , 'r(�i.�a• ,_. :'� .F e,•¢ - .}•..R =fi=r 1r s. \YI } '.'n. ,„'•,• } .fi1•'•ie,- .4f.`t7.n•I **A. F'.',St� % ,!"J.tA•.•' ^'T�.; s • '•F G r• I;r t� + _ TREE SERVICE _�•'ai" y; :� G „�7, �c •. ComCl�u NboxW+ItutY SMx{na _ • • .•REFORT FOR MORSE COM£OI.TThG DROOP ' ATLMt ROBERT J, t1ETIING y Northwood Tow Cantor r 4860 Irvin* Haulavard, Suite'0201 Ir ine. G 92710 -1299 w, ••? OBSERVATIONS AND RECCltLr4DATIONS REGARDLMG TREES AT: is 3FI8'IORIA CROVE� �Y PREPARED BY SA191E1. L. INAPP L21APY TREE SERVICE y ^r�' APRIL 1, 1986 RECEIVER .a -APR 21966 x7 THE WILLIAM LYON co +^;• APPENDIX C >S�at ” ,•r,• " -.'i .r . •'!, �1:� x5 wc lw = a Y .,C•:•"�,`•:"C'.�"�'° -N �-7 CYl'�i� .w...._,_ .... ^ ;y s �11;�. , i,315 •88 447 (71W SMA - Conacor 1481 r i'r'ir�•' YF TtS-, ,. P '� •P.^ar`.i r.wi•�;. :5•c.•t_ _s'arraj.tua: is tt= •- �r'4r :."T�y.� :•r..�...+..�... •.i. :':.c� :rs... .. �;y.. .,.G�o �. M � _ e� +et 'ia^.a: •_ :T� zo•rJ''i • ;j,,.. -.r yv.J .a1 l.ri;. :'+iw�._.r`..� 1 �"''y aa�l ��`- •.�s'Y; :: �. :Y T7���'�� c..'a'r�'j.%m�.� -•.layer' ��i ^=.r r.:" `i�''•• "- �i�. +' . f.'- C�„•-s -e %.._.. -• .: r 7 �Z �. ,; ,: y;T��rtr.'- r•.�r- �- .''�'1`ti � _ � ��! � .� -• RE: Preservation of Schiaus molle (California pepper) grove'vithin the'.0 • ' Vletorin compl ex. z =. :v •-.' 19 Sr There are Seventy -Four (74) Schinus note (California pepper) trees planted in a formal grove setting and they are approximately Fifty (30) to Sixty (60) years old. The La Itornla pepper trees have been growing in a natural environment wit*, little or no regular nalntacance with respect to safety or to preserv: ^a he grove. These trees have been left to Cia viciss- itudes of nature. There has been an array of different damaging and injurious elements effected either by man or by natural event*. The majority of the trees ex- hibit extensive lover trunk, 'jasal area cavities /dewy due to past equipment operation and storage. Vandalism, fires, wind damage and limb failure from overweight or unbalanced cacq=3a have created structural loss of strength. What is seeming to be natural. d common such as injuries and stress, which other tree species might tolerate, becomes much more crucial for brittle, soft - wooded trees like the California pepper •sae, which decays readily in response to wounding. California pepper trees are very high in vitality, but extremely low in vigor. Vitality is the ability to grow, reproduce and maintain overall energy sources. Vigor is a tree's ability to resist dewy, to set or fora boundaries, and to limit the spread of dewy. Vigor i.s a set genotit coding that can not be changed and directly relates to longevic- This is vhy'the California popper tree can appear to be in a healthy stable condition, but in reality nay be structurally unsafe. This is the condition of the grove in general. EaQ�sed is a sketch of the grove area depicting trees for possible saving and removal. The Seven (7) trees identified for preservinS very the best in overall condition virh respect to the grove, although none could be regarded as a perfect specimen tree. They had the least percentage of injuries, cem- blum loss, dewy and canopy problaas. They were tested with the Shigomater, an instrument that measures the electrical resistance of the weed for dewy detection. This was coupled with core samples to physically old in defining discolored systems. All.of the seven (7) trees tasted had internal decay, thereby limiting the life pan. i+iAO':}<':.is Y' :'�'i >�w •:R � °�2.i :t. w•�a;a- '7' -- him Y X PRESERVATION RZ1U_r_R_E_ME_M_T_S � FOR HAT TREES 1. Corrective pruning to specified standards for tree preservation 1, urban development- (Certified Arbarist preferred) 2. Establishment of undisturbed soil zone around tree bases. But at , 12%1 ratio of BOLL Surface width to potential trunk diamater. 3. Clearing of all veg!taxtn and installation of wood chip mulch zF of all natural leaf litter beneath on a needed basis, retention canopies. 4. Where soil has been compacted or otherwise disturbed in the LOS), fertilization- root zone area (particularly under Cd4GP aeration, watering via soil injection of all secasible•soil in the root too*- 5. xu3tallatioa of irrigation systems with capacity for periodic deep watering, during and after development. o! chain link fencing to prot*ct-tress during 6. Installation development Of the area. 7. Examination and documentatlun of each tree, with specific if maintenance /— preservation :ecomanadations. S. Transmittal of recommendations and specificaLions for con— ti tinning tree maintenance t 0 parties responsible for tree and Lind Scapa management an Completion of area development- I •%�'.'M1.�w.,�u,�,�y..� -.: .eta /w......yh- F•":1T.c•'!•.:r. •�.JCt STn MOTES FOR MINIMIZING LIABILITY RISIS , r RE: All tress that arc to be preserved v CONCERNS: A. Aging irbaa forest ' B. Crdvth of suburbs C. Environmental factors +• Strategies: A. Annual indp etion by Qualified tree specialists B. Avoid erijis management i C. Establishment of systematic management plan i' D. Apply arboricult::ral principals ±+ E. Documentation n . W s V .rc l., t -e i TREE EVALURTION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOP •, PROPOSED pRRK SITE — VICTORIA GRCVFS ptya�taaM • \,% dotd.n Gnat amrl,ox„anta!larrlena. Sttc. •CaaeatewM W i4•wtM YwY.K •Tn•• lWn •IbarbYf.M.Vr W/�tpWYa TQy /qWl !le KCwMw•w Meet The trees of the ProOOfed park site are all California peooers iHsi?1n_SE Cg1S a >• These trees were planted by the previous landowner, when land us. in this area was primarily agricultural. The overall condition of this stand of tress is poor due to neglect, wind breakage, and fungal disease organisms. The condition of the majortty of the tress Present do not Justify incorporation in a park setting. Based soley on the physiological condition, a recommsndasion other than to removs all the trees and start fresh with A new landscape, was difficult. Considering the lack of mature tree specimens in the proposed development area and the historical value of this r agricultural remnant, I � +ve selected several trees that pose as for Incorporation 'into the new the most likely candidate' landscape. The location of these trees can be found on the enclosed map. RECOMMENDRTIGNS FOR CARE RIM MAINTENANCE "^ 1, water relations t The trews of the Victoria Groves Park sits 'h&vs.maturod in an 1a environment that was nob irrigated. To alter the water relations L -- APPENDIX D' a,v i—AM.W significantly with irrigation and turf within the dripline of the tree could hasten the decline of ;haze treat. If landscaping is dune within the dripline of these trees it should be done utilising drought tolerant species. 2. Orade Changes Removing or adding sots under A tree CAMOY Can seriously damaCs the roots. If 9-ode must be altered significantly within the dripline. the affected true should be removed. 3. Pruning X. .h. All trues to be incorporated into the new landscace setting enould receive a Class I — Fine Prune. What follows is the National Arcorists Association soecifications. CLASS I — FINE PRUNING •• „Removal of dead, dying, diseased, interfering, objecticnablc and weak branches. . • Fine pruning shall consist of the removal of dead, dying, diseased interfering, objectionable, and weak branches, as well • as selective thinninig to lessdn wind resistants. The rsacJal,.of such described brancnes is to include those an the main trunkst as well as those inside the leaf area. An occasional hranM,••up to 1/2" diameter, as described above, may remain within thv� �,m&in.-; '-, leaf area to its full length when it is not practical to rmsew`...4 The following spepificationn, shall apply$ a. All cuts shall be made sufficiently close to the trunk or a' parent limb, without cutting into the branch collar or leaving a protruding stub, so that closure can readily start under normal conditions. Clean cuts stall be made at all times. + b. It is necessary to amcut branches too heavy to handle t� r prevent splitting or peeling the bark. Where nectssary, to or allow fungus prevent true or propan ''damage, branches shall be lowered to ths`9A' a' cambium layer must be used, and care taken to r` ground by proper ropes or squipmant, d •. c. Remove the weaker or least desirable of c -ossen or rubbing known to be ,liasased, tools are to be disinfected + branches. Such removal chould not leave large holes in the wood general outline of the tree. or Chlorox soluti�.. d. Treatment of r••ts and wounds, with tee wound dressing, Is optional except where open wounds in certrin trees may attrcct Insects that carry didease or allow fungus invasion. If such treatment is made, materials non -toxic to the cambium layer must be used, and care taken to treat only the wxpoted wood with a ' thin post of dressing. •. a. Cn trees known to be ,liasased, tools are to be disinfected 709 tdsnaturod diliatid iV r; with wthyl alcohol at wood alcohol appropriately with water! or Chlorox soluti�.. after sach'cut arid: 6ANSJR, ;%ae it n: "L`E'A - t lk*P + �•;•v3t_ fit. ._ 7lai,+7%.t.4t }, J 1 oetween trams where there is known to be a danger of tranemtttimg the disease on tools. ' f. Old Injuries are to be inspected. Those not closing properly and where the callus growth is not already completely estvblis ^ad, should be traced where aoprcoriate. If desired, for cosmetic purposes, the wound may be treated with a thin past of wound dressing. g. Where practical, all vlsi-)le girdling roots sh,%ll be treated as followst 'ISF, V.- 1. Cut root at either end. 2. Notch root in center with a ahiea'. 3. Remove entire root without Injuring the bark or parent stem. h. The presence o" my stru tural viakness, disease conditions, decayed trunk or branchest split crones cr branches, should be reported in writing to a supervisor andi..r the owner, and • car- active measures recommended. , 4. Inspection duritrg site development It is highly recommended that the all trees be inspected by a qualified arborist both during construction and post construction phases. 4' u•yr y.� m Li A�p 1S 114 (3 II 10 z 7- I --s- x A�p 1S 114 (3 II 10 z 7- I --s- S �a c i :l t i Tin CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: May 21, 1986 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Diregtor, Cowdinity Services Department By: Kart.+ McGuire -Emery. Assistant Park olanner Subject: Resolution Supporting Proposition 43 - The 1986 State Park Bond Act Background' On June 3. 1986, voters statewide will go to the polls to vote on Proposition 43, the 1986 State Park Bond Act. If approved, the 'RC Bond Act would offer the City of Rancho Cucamonga an estimated allocation of $172,777.00, for park and recreation use. In the past, our coamnity has used State Park bonds for the acquisition of Beryl Park in 1976 through the '74 Bond Act; the partial acquisition of Heritage Park in 1978 through the '76 Bond A.t; and the construction of Bear Gulch Part in 1985 through the '80 Bond Act. The Community Services Department has also recently received notification that our '84 Bond Act submittals providing tennis court facilities for both Beryl Park and !tons Park are favorably being considered for funding. It is important to note that passape of Proposition 41 is not a new tax, but rather the voters authorizing State coney to be seen' for parks. Prcpo -itiun 43 is a good opportunity or the people of taacho Cucamonga, and California as a whole, to demonstrcte their desire *or continued development of local, regional and State Park resources. Recommendation: Staff recommends the approval of the attached Resolution in support of Proposition 43 - The 1986 State Park Bond Act. ,i RESOLUTION go. 9 (p - /S-4 A RWOLUTION OF SEE CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 43 WHICH PLACES BEFORE SHE VOTERS Of CALIFORNIA, JOVE 3, 1986, A BOND MEASURE TO PRCTIDE FUNDING FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL LAND ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER RELATED PURPOSES WHEREAS, park and recreation progress vastly enhance our environment and our lives; and WHEREAS, leisure facilities and open spaces in both urban and rural areas are a necessity to life, since they have a substantial 0fect on until and physical health, economic productivity and social probless; and WRRNEA9. Proposition 43 would place before the voters of California a manure to provide financing of a program of acquiring, developing. or restoring real property for Ht� -and local park, beach, recreational or historical resources preservation p m-ses; and WHEREAS, the proposed program will make available additional, or augment existing, recreation areas and add or improve facilities in and near population centers; and WHEREAS, enhancement of parks, connervation of natural resources and historic preservation projects have direct economic benefit to nor comatuity and the State as a whole; and moreover, will benefit the health and well -being of Californians. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Rancbo Cucamonga goes on record in support of Proposition 43. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this a day of e, 19a. AYES: HOES: ASSIST: Jeffrey King, M.gor /} O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CUcnafg STAFF REPORTS `�,, s GATE: may 7, 1986 U a Lvn TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TR. 13066 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET, EAST OF AMETHYST, SUBMITTED BY HILL WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT Tract 13066 was approved by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1985, for division of ont into 27 lots in the Street, east Residential The Developer, Hill Williams Development, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements In the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $306,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $153,000.00 Letters to received from tr esonn schooldi tricsand Cucamonga County Water District. C.L.6R .s haveallbee approved by the City Attorney. RECOM ENDATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution the M approving Tract 13066, acceptlny said agreement and security and authorizing ayar and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Res tfully udo ;ed l LB H: :ke Attachments - a e. Ile Ic _L I� -- ✓— CITY OF PROJECT- RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: TRACT 13066 Y ENGINEERING DNISION EXHIBIT: °A° "3 Ct TI Of AAACNa COCAXOXCA I"301tiliAtq ACREEX,da TA 130U made and AROY All NEX of THESE PD SuOtllrls lon tKai° Into, fe Cant,...nf6f St that the +ODIICaDIa a A ^t or to .1th s agreleent la 411fornfa OrJlnaneas the $tats 91 411I0rn1avl VCas of the ha rf In l /ter it a IS Cot0ory7tO d,ty of RA.cha And of the anV I/If rCd t0 q tnf CILr• an OY and OftrHa [UdmCit A —� -- beret.- {—Ill ilia r Clt Yr Lr e a!!e [O a1 [Ile YITRESSETx; real TRAT. LXEAEAS syyol��d 0... to mOdlrif ion tlna.. as Said ht sharp Don the tram to n the condl tlooglOPa cartel. WHEREAS y Paroled t0 be eft br anld ta1° City ^ +{ UNbllfAem grtait r +nd 0 [w,itaa 9p era111 elacit�d P' 0l MltYlf lte to a IgYlremtnt{ I� t^ s1.s, Parnell Of told —• �t1�f of $tr— $Aid Dore toper THEREFORE. It fs hereby y Agreed by said City and by Oerol0I1rh calf" ill / •Per hereby agrey to of rltaln tre�ef eLOtnf Iran lheenta Agrees to 0a pa construct at Ef alert Oatf,h.fe0f.e ^era. resolution Th It S. ^, pal the sh all fbe saldAttfr or the I $r bleep[. dT CouaC11 Et9 tae fir 1 ^all be C1ty n pprovinA on or ft +nntvey 4Jtdf Lf 01 saltl d; fault on y folio. Id, floe has been gnntetl b OP row- Ire t' Y fold CItY as aan lneitern °tan. 0• The 0 Oro•id- AoCtaeallte the to OWGIOPOr mar request an fatfnS inn f CAneof ore Alto not lets tech raquaat snail be of tiq to aacessltotfn shall ContalAn ]0 days bSfarl subeftted to Cc Alt to re0 if' extension of + Statement of to ireuilrattdn cods truce ton pro. talons of e0' The City Shul stanch And to ra + +And+rde Gaft alt LPtols agrgpnt h•.va tee occurred dnrin Ad7Vl Lents they!•. If• Pad Imarovenda�ftltliat the 9 SAO term parent, +07 zu0rtantlat [Starter. a change hat the Proryatw`of atlsAs aPld or fl III OCl City seal[ comply with at pr [toe of this agreememt, the 9 + to cam ":"To' s. +nd th trfupon re corer Dro YlSloni to 0 rare th l coat aa0 a net S the right upenu lecuro�d the OnelaOar add by Any la.ful s• ine 0 his surety •ace let O and Sal o+re'lu Sr shaIn C,O,d O O terft co frhedu)fs. Dean[ riLlf des of the cocaeon the r serrtce e, TAe 9a County Valor OR regulation,. n tOC+tlon, or ramoValdofr any �� component responsible r ant, system in conelfct Ylth of COa {y cmpo 01 or r10 LCem tan satlf faction of any Irrigation r srs au. the City Engineer an Or ImDroremadtste, the orner aT ouch r to S5OO Williams Ow'?, Of Coepa .1_ +tar Suitt 711 4 Ana 4RYCn Road nr Aaahele..C4 97607 !� Tnaq +nd , Corns /Ind. P.N. �/ 1. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Oravings and Standard Specifications of tee City, mad to the ImprOSement plan weaved by and on f /le In the off Ica of the City Engleter. Slid flpr..emen is an tabulated On the Construction and gone Estimate, tereby Incorol rated o0 paps an 6 htreat. as taken from the Improvement plans Ilste- tallest by number The 0evelopev shall also be responsible for construc- tlu of any transitions or other Incidental work beyond the tract hedar at as needed for :afcty and prop,, surface dralasq corrected, upon the direction discovered the City Cnginte� Revised uctl iwork due to Slid plan modifications shall be covered by the prevssloas Of this agreement and secured by the surely covering the Original Planned works 0. Construction Parml if fAall be Obtained by the Oevetoper from the office of the City En tinier Drier to start of wow• all re0ulatlons titled thereon Shall be Observed, with • •tion given to safety procedures, Control of dust, nolst, or r s les and City h Departments. Failure droner ailure tof co ply °w1th otlh.4 .Ineh-ll be subject to the Densities provided therefor. Sts •7 g. The 08re10por shall be r°apnslble for r ..... I of all loose rocks sod other a Is from Public rights- of•way within or adjoining told derelop.ent reselling from work retative to Slid dn°lopmtat diligently 10. Dark done within existing street% shall be to cmptee °�n� °an0 coo volt' 1n° the event City unlash have fltdl delay In CapletfOn, and td rategr all Catt in0 taDomit lneurred ream the OeveloDer :O. /ar AIS contractor by any tawful suns. It. Sd tlen CS the struts °andl easamtntsi let said subidlvislon.gap tot the cmmplttlon and acuptance of Wd were or Improvement by said Citl Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling Dub Ic Of each and every dangerous cpnditlon ealsNet to said street or element. and w111 protect the troy Ino Public from aueA defective or dangerous conditions. Until the cempletton of all Improvements, herein Incorporated on Improvements shall, be under a the charged Of said'Developer Accepted Said 0 'eloper may close all or a portion of sty street subject to the conditions contained In A tuporery strut closure permit. Issued by the City toglnesr, whenever It Is ntceSSlry to protect the Dubllc during tht construction of the lyroveatnts herein agreed to be made. 12 Parkway leads raeulred to be planted shall be &adntcleenuet the beta° °camp a ledot Aa ll antlOv Shall York. grading provided by Ordinance In accordance with the Planting diagram approved by the City Community OevelOpmant Director, The Developer shall be responsible for clot al r,lnp all true Planted In good health until the epd of the qq all ■ate,. nu purled, or for one Tear after p aatln9. rhlclever Is maitre 17. The Develper 1l retponslble for mans ley alt condt- tians sstullshud by tut CIly punvama to the Subdivision /7Q and no Improvement security provided herelowith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorlted by the city council of the City. le. This agreement shalt not terminate until the 0 Me "Ca guarantee security hereinafter described nas been released by the City. or until a new ag "emert together with the required Improvement security has been sec •I:ted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by i:solutien of the City Council $ame has been accepted, and this agreewent and the Improvement security therefor has been released. IS. The inproreeent security to be furnished by the Developer wit" this agreement shall Consist of the following and ,hall be In a fun acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful perforeaftC: of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties is the form and content specified by Covernment Code Section 66199.1. 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 2 A deposit with tht City of Molloy or negct/able • bonds of the tind approved for stertjng deposits of public Monte$ 2. To secure laborers and materlalmen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the fore and content specified by Government Code Section 66699 2. 2. An leproveuent Security Instrument in the fore and content specified by the City Attorney. S. A deposit with City of money of negotiable bonds of the kind approved for seco -ing C. A cash deposit with the City to geerastee payment by the Developer to the engineer or su:reyar whose certificate appears upon the final Map for the sett Iny of all boundary, lot corner, and street ceatefl ire manuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City The amount of the deposit May be any amiunt certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no •slue is submitted, the cash bona shall be as shorn on the Constructioa and bond tetleate contained herein Said cash depcsit May be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment In full from the engineer or surveyor 0. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements described In this agreenent shall be from flea dafncts in materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the Improve. seats found to he defective within one (1) year followingq the data on which the tmproveeents are accepted by the City its I b^ repaired or replaced by 0evel000r free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a malntlasace guarantee Security In a Spit equal to ten percent (103) of the Construction estimate or $200,30, whlcherer, is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Dave operas obi )pat on% as described in this pare. 9raph. The maintenance guarantee slcurlty shall also Secure the aleh /cal performance be the Developer of any obligation of the Deraloper to do •.ecit.•d work with respect to any parkway. -2. /7-3 r • est,gto or $200.00, whichever It ggreater, to Secure the faithful performance of Developer's abllgatl out as described in this par &. graph. The maintenance ouevantta security shall also secure the f althful perfarmsnct by the Developer of any obligation of the Develeper to do tpeoifldd wcrk with respect to SOY parkway • aatatenence asusagent district' Once the fmpreremelttf hale been accepted the ant a malateeance guarantee security Sea been accepted b7 city. the other Implovtmant security described in this agrttmt0t way be released Provider that such rf Irate is othervite authors ltd by the Subdivision hap Act Ordf. ince. and any applicable City 1T. That the Devlloper Shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage Insurance as Shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor Perform *ark covered for rnatureaofo ar to becaefeeof the Property orr f�ewao0erationscendoy the this agreement, whether such operatlpns be by hlmael/ er by Contractor el any Or subcontractor, or anyone direct if indirectly told bypl he aq pertens, Owen though such damages be not caused by •ma ieolf9eucd of the Developer or any coatractor� or Sub ratter or anyone Omplayed by said per,... The PUMC IlaDDfhIlly and property damage Insurance shall list the City as additenel tasvrad and directly protect the City, Its officers, agents and aplains, as well as the Developer, his contractors I'd his subcontractors, and al! Insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state The mini 'us AmountsAmounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Contr[ctor's liability Insurance, provldlna bodily tn!pry or death liability limits of not less the f 700,000 for tcch person and $1,000 000 for tach accident er oecn rren<0. and Jamngt prop Pty tlabll. Its limits of not loft than $100.00 t' for mach accl. dent or occurrence rlth an a p -.gear limos of f2S0,004 CC clalma whIth may veto .row the oyes. lions of the Der eloper In the performance of the vor k porals provided B. Aclean lee 1" lift y Insurance covering all ten ICICS used in the performance of this agreement I S 1person ' asithan 5200, 000 for coca y&adl$300,000 for f� Sec! accl0ont or occurrence, and property duty! 119DMty limits of not less than $5770,000 for each tat or ltssd than $100,000 which may arise gfra?*gate the opera` sinus of tM DeveloOev or his Contractor In parfarmley the work provided for herein, 1D. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall flit with the City a certificate or certificates cf Insurance coveriny the specified Insurance Each such certificate shall bear a endorsement precluding the b.x such curt ficate,d¢tton in coverage of any policy evidences niter the Malt nave r�cai :e loot Ica ion,syy the registered mall from the Innrean carrier. rj As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein of Intent and to compl/ with mama, the Subdielder has submltteb the following described improvement security, and het a/ /feed his signature beret,, ohs ' / 7f' �i .' r_m FAITHFUL PE,FORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: $706.000.00 Mane and !,dress of surety; MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Mount: $157.000.00 NANO and address of suraty: CASH DEPOSIT MDRUMENTATION Typei Prift Clpa Amount: Name and address of surety: SE.SSO.00 MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amounts M/A Namd�nd address of surety: •t,•�, 21_21i TO BE POSTED FRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OT THE CITY IN RITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto Mum caused these - yresenls to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalltiaf re0nl14C by aw on the dews set fOrth Opposite their 9119natur s. Date '0' �J'L by iV• aCl t OeteloDer �- I 9na YH C �L/ � Ct.�L(i4r4J VR Oat• by �Siynaiur, — Developer r nu Accepted: City Of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca l i To role A Municipal Corporation 6j: Nayar Attests 1 v 1 Ap7r 0ytdi DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST RL NOTARIZED -S- _ f. Eawwra100 IOSPT -TION TEE 12.865.00 SUB TOTAL 71T T -e aRISIMAfiltWIL10EA11O1 CASO LMII GEACT COSTS 10% tarmnit (affomf FAITIDOL PEUORMA4CE BOND 110031 PLVMU1ATIN 5:61117 ICASII) 2 /.SS7.W� 111608 ATM 7OTEAIAL BONG (5V&) 411rsu4nl to city of poncho Wca+dx7aZ lciPal Ca4. Title 1. Chapter 1.08. adeptlog Sam 10WHlm Canty Code Titles. Ouptm 1 -5, a ash mtaratten/dellmatlm depult skall ' M able prior to Isms of AN to91x"Ing Coutm.loo PeralL. - E.vtlt City Or RASCIIb OXNI0MGA Et101RIER11M DIVISION ENCAOmIcimst PIaNIT r[E SCIiILAE For Intrastate" . , . Date: 1.24-[6- tmgY y: nllr A CX File gil "ancea City Drawing No. 0 910 1 11110 0 ADIEI Does not Include vrrent in for Wltirg Omit W pavement deanits UI)•1TT � MIT ITEM MACE AMOUNT L.F P.C.C. curb - l: C.F. 24• putter 7.25 .Nis L.r. I.C.C. curb - S' C.F. N• putter 6.00 ,a.vo L.P. P.C.C. curb only 5.50 L.F. A.C. bers, 4.W S.F. 4• P.C.C. 0deedk 1.75 �RRAn SJ Orin tpprvan 2.50 n ,uev �.1I10 S.F. a• P.C.C. cross putter floc. curb) 2.40 C.T. strut oaaratlov 1.50 C.T. Imparted embankment 1.50 9LSLL •F. heparatlm of aubgndo 0.15 ,o.tar S.F. Crashed app. beam (per IWA thick) 0.01 .ev5 l.Pdl_ TO" A.C. over 1500 [ova) 27.00 5e.an TON A.C. 900 to 1700 tans) 55.00 ��fjD�.1L A.C. SW to 9W tens) 45.00 -'� A.C. jwdtr 500 tads) 60.00 -� S.F. A.C. ]• thick) 0.55 S.r. Patch A.C. (trenct 1.75 S.F. 1• thick A.C. ,,ergay 0.3D _ EA. Adjust steer amhole to grade 250.00 EA. Adjust u." clean get to grade 150.00 _)_ EA. Adjust water valves to grade 75.00 -7S lights SBarricadess IOt1.W Ii' L I. (Interm. SSW min) SEW L.r. 2 a 4e redocd header 1 75 S.F. Removal of A.C. Par ormL 0.15 _ S.F. hw,al of P.C.C. 7.10 �7D L.r. AL ursl of A.C. bao 1.00 EA. Strait slgu 20D.W =T EA. 44DS Lot Drain US.Do iTD L.r Concrete black All is OD S.F Rdlainlap .811 7.00 _�- TON Aggravate base 7.00 C.T. C vcute structures 425 CO 55,375 It l.r. Ie• acv 2010 D 29.00 5u L.F. 2140• act 1000 De 15.00 f1m ll - 2(4 40 L.F. 16• ACP 2000 0 49.00 L.F. ea• ACP 1200 0 75.00 1 ]7! EA. Catch basin If • /• FOOD. DO oy FA. Catch bas In Divehi 74441 4000.00 409 IA. Catch aisle w • 22• 4500.00 2 EA. Local dunssion 4• 50.00 a.0oo � L1. Local deproaslon li• 1000.00 _1 EA. J.KtfW structure 5000,00 .•n0o 1 E0. maebvla 1500.0 1.500 i EA. C. Cap" MOD .•u i EA. Clt,vvut 40.00 5oe M r L.F. a- I.,m flaw 0,04 a5.00 us nv 4.200 L.F. Saucul 2.W Mail L m Ikadiall (44• wlog) 4000.00 41ROP L.F. Red.eod head" 1.75 7," S.F. Landscapingq & Irrigation 7,75 L.F. gall curb ( P.C.C.) 7.9) Eawwra100 IOSPT -TION TEE 12.865.00 SUB TOTAL 71T T -e aRISIMAfiltWIL10EA11O1 CASO LMII GEACT COSTS 10% tarmnit (affomf FAITIDOL PEUORMA4CE BOND 110031 PLVMU1ATIN 5:61117 ICASII) 2 /.SS7.W� 111608 ATM 7OTEAIAL BONG (5V&) 411rsu4nl to city of poncho Wca+dx7aZ lciPal Ca4. Title 1. Chapter 1.08. adeptlog Sam 10WHlm Canty Code Titles. Ouptm 1 -5, a ash mtaratten/dellmatlm depult skall ' M able prior to Isms of AN to91x"Ing Coutm.loo PeralL. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. a x $07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91770 Gentleman: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9. Section 664)7 of the Government Code, the undarslgne.1 hereby agrees that all monuments Shaun on the final map of TR Lb766 are to be tit and furnished by th mine fuP i• ex s engineer or surveyor on or before ex soecflted In the En9lnnr s .. urr70r s mart scat• in 'greet to fled In the •tat tie. on to complate all engine a -t.,q agrees t requirements Srish Rte In •martian 6619), 0/ the Government Coda. The aldersigned hands you haremith the sum of S 2.550.00 As A C. h deposit, Said deposit to gumrantee t u t e monuments the b~ them del*ds PtCified and furnished s the angl Above o Provided rn,il be -Paid by the undersigned It Is further understood and agreed that In the event tM undars i9nad falls to Cnaplete the above requirements within the time speclfleds the City Of PI'1ho Cucamonga Is Amthorlsed to co Vista ,aid requirements or .muse them to be Completed and the oast thereof is to be a charge &gains[ said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga li autnorlted to alike the necessary transfer from Said Cash daPOSIt to the credit for the proper city fund It 1s firther agreed that Of the undersigned does not present evldenca to the City COUACII that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the set 1n; of the final Monuments, and If the en ginner or surveyor gives the notices preecribel In Section 66197 of the Government Code, the C. shall Par to said engineer :r surveyor, the cash deD OSIt herein aade. f the cost of Completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash depot lt, the undersigned agrees to Day the difference within thirty OD) days After receiving written statement from Olfferenie bet eea no tha trash tDasl teC�nE 1tEe actual cost a/ said require a a. / cE�1Xr all - Subdivider 0o E. oNrn ✓N ,ej p.L // Address .vin.. q a Gate '% - n The de Posher of record (for return of any portion of the Cash deposit) shall be °Q mums NOTE: TO BE SUBI:ITTEO FULLY FILLED OUT AID SIGNED `�. 177 RESOLUTION 30. 86 -122 -. A RESOLUTION OF TRS CITT COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCSO tVCAMORCA, CALIPORMIA, APPRWIOD IMPROVEMi7T 3GRSM9MY2. IMPROFSMIDT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT No. 13066 WEEMS. the Tentative Map of Tract 17066, consisting of 27 lots, snbuitted by 5111 N1111aas Development, Sub .dar. located on the cuutb aide of 19tb Street, east of Amethyst has bean submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said gubdivider and approved by @aid City as prmided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ord.sooce No. 28 of said City; and WMMRA9, to meet the requirements established as prarequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement 4reemaut submitted herewith for approval and executi'ra by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and actmite for approval said Final Nap offering for dedication for public use the muses delineated tbareou. ?y. NOW. TSERSFORE, EE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the CL-7 of Rancho Cutswoga, California, as follows 1. That sold Improvement Agreement be and the ease is opprmed and the Mayor is authorised to execute same on behalf of Bald City and the City Clerk is actbarised to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficieeq subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Atterney; and 7. That the offers for dedication and the P£nal Map delineating sow be approval and the City Clark is authorised to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, A -MCNED, and ADOPTED this dry of , 1986. / 70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATS: May 21. 1986 91 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing for Annual Assessment for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Attached is the City Engineer's Annual Repot and a Resolution declaring the City's intention to levy and collect assessments and setting a public hearing for June 4. 1986 for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Following is a list of assessments for each district: OS /B6 Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 1 Landscape Maint. D'st. No. 2 Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 3 Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 4 Landscape Maint. Dist. Nc. 5 RECOMMENDATION: 86/87 $38.00 $28 00 per Asset. Unit $223.77 f22o.77 per Asset. Unit -0- $258.7 per Asset. Unit $154.10 $128.34 per Asset. Unit $163.64 $113.41 per Asset. Unit It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolutions, giving preliminary approval of the City Engineer's Annual Report and setting a public hearing on June 4,1986 to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and S. Respectfully mi' ed, LBH:bc Attachments 17f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1986 -87 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR Landscape Maintenance Districts No.s 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTIDN The report deals with the projected costs for Fiscal Year 1985 -86 and the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1986 -87 0f the following maintenance districts for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Lands. Maintenance District No. 2 zf Landsca a Maintenance District No. 3 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Areas to be included In the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagramsand specifically tabulated in Appendix A. The total area of said Maintenance Districts are as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 "! 2Z S.F. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 9§0!66 S. F. + Parks Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 050 + Basin Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 I 1` S.F. + Parks Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Z4,U0D S.F. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of parkway improvements. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Parkway improvements were constructed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval fer each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map of development plan and the assessment diagram for the axact location of the pa,kway areas. The plans and specifications for landscape improvement on the individual development are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and -1- �D specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping. Including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or Injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls Immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS Nr costs will be incurred for parkway initial landscaping improvement construction. All initial Improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historic data, estimated maintenance costs for fiscal year 1986 -87 are as follows: A. Landscape Maintenance District No 1 Ro. of Square Feet In Landscape Haint. Dist. No. 1 314.376 >y. No, of Square Feet H tamed in Fiscal Year 85/86 186.850 Projected No. of Square Feet to Be Maintained In 86/87 314.376* *See Appendix A for Detailed Parkway Inventory — Estimated Revenue $94,197.00 Less Estimated Expenditures of $33.637 * $60.560.00 Fund Balance 7 -1 -85 $63,066 • Projected Reserve at Fiscal Year End 1123.626.00 These funds will he used for Restoratior of Parkways, Tracts 9444 6 9445 Archibald Ave and Nilson Ave -2- Projected Expenditures 1985/86 1986/87 Contract Services $23.741.56 549.200.00 Electric 1.356.00 1'CnO.00 Mater 5.424.00 13.800.00 Labor 3.712.00 Materials _ 500.00 Equipment 1.000.00 Assessment Admin. 3.115.00 8.453.00 Parkway Restoration 40.072.00 General Liability 527.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST _$33.637.00 $120.764.00 Estimated Revenue $94,197.00 Less Estimated Expenditures of $33.637 * $60.560.00 Fund Balance 7 -1 -85 $63,066 • Projected Reserve at Fiscal Year End 1123.626.00 These funds will he used for Restoratior of Parkways, Tracts 9444 6 9445 Archibald Ave and Nilson Ave -2- 8. Landscape Maintenance District NO 2 (Victoria Planned Comunity) No. of Square feet in Landscape Maint. Dist. Mo. 2 590,666 r Pdrk Total a�i ed in Fiscal Year 85/86 8 Acres windrow Park Full Half Amt. Units No. of Dwelling Units F.Y. 85/86 1921 3466 3654 No. of Dwelling Units Annexed 85/86 325 668 659 No. of Dwelling Units to be 900.00 3.000.00 _ Assessed in F.Y. 86/87 2246 _4134 4313 45.534.00 Total Estimated Cost 120.764 • S28.00 Annual Assessment No. of Assmt. Units 4313 20.000.00 per Unit 8. Landscape Maintenance District NO 2 (Victoria Planned Comunity) No. of Square feet in Landscape Maint. Dist. Mo. 2 590,666 r Pdrk No. of Square Feet Mair a�i ed in Fiscal Year 85/86 8 Acres windrow Park Projected No. of Square'Feet to be Maintained in 86/87 590.6(,6 + Park of Dwelling Projected Expenditures F.Y.85/86 745 1211.04 Acres 1985186 1985/87 Contract Services 520.380.00 i144.941.00 Electric 900.00 3.000.00 Water 3.021.00 15.000.00 La Jor 10.784.00 45.534.00 Materials 1.941.00 51000.00 Equipment 1.535.00 20.000.00 Assessment Admin. 10.401.00 19.798.00 General Liability n is _ 6.300.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $48.962.00 $259.573.00 Estimated Revenue 5297.157.00 Less Estimated Expenditures $489622.00 • 248.195 Fund Balance 711/85 - $59464 • Projected Reserve at Fiscal Year End $307.459 These funds will be used for Restoration of Victoria Park Lane 's Full Half 1/4 No. of Dwelling Units F.Y.85/86 745 1211.04 Acres No of Dwelling Units Annexed 85/86 117 No of Dwelling Units to be _ Assessed in F.Y. 86/87 862 1194.3 Acres Total Estimated Cost 5259,573 • $223.77 Annual Assessment No. o sat. n is 1160 per Unit • '3 /G� 's C. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Hyssops No. of Square Feet in Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 3 6.05C + Basin No. of Square Feet Maintained in Fiscal Year 85/86 -0- Projected No. of Square Feet to Be Maintained in 86/87 6.050 Projected Expenditures Estimated Revenue $2.817.00 Less Estimated Expenditures $1.051.00 • Projected Reserve at Fiscal Year End _ $1.766.00 These funds will be used for Reserves for unusual _ expenses and cash flow No. of Units F.Y. 85/06 No. of Units Annexed 85/66 110. of Units to be Assessed in F.Y. 86/07 Full 8 0 8 half 0 0 0 Total Estimated Cost $2,070 258.75 per parcel No. of Assm�ts 8 Assessment -4- /83 $s- 1985186 1986/87 Contract Services $594.00 $834.00 Electric 29.00 150.00 Water 198.00 500.00 Labor 270.00 Materials _ 100.00 Equipment 50.00 Assessment Admin 230.00 145.00 General Liability 21.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $1.051.00 $2.0 10.00 Estimated Revenue $2.817.00 Less Estimated Expenditures $1.051.00 • Projected Reserve at Fiscal Year End _ $1.766.00 These funds will be used for Reserves for unusual _ expenses and cash flow No. of Units F.Y. 85/06 No. of Units Annexed 85/66 110. of Units to be Assessed in F.Y. 86/07 Full 8 0 8 half 0 0 0 Total Estimated Cost $2,070 258.75 per parcel No. of Assm�ts 8 Assessment -4- /83 $s- 0. Landscape Maintenance District No 4 (Terra Vista) No. of Square Feet in Landscape Maint. 01st. No. 4 205.151 (2- 5 acre Parks) No. of Square Feet Maintained to Fiscal Year 85/86 50.143 Projected No. of Square Feet to be Maintained in 86/87 205.151 2- 5 acre parks Projected Expenditures .5- 's+- 1985/86 1986/87 Contract Services $3.109.00 $62.997.00 Electric 20.00 4.000.00 Water 100.00 17,000.00 Labor 35.176.00 Materials 5.000.00 Equipment 12.000.00 Assessment Admin. 3.500.00 10.407.00 General Liability 1.490.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $6.728.00 $143.670.10 Estimated Revenue _ {100.000.00 Less Estimated Expenditures $6.128.00 _ • Projected Reserve at Fiscal Year End $93.272.00 These funds will be used for Reserves for cash flow and unusual maintenance costs Total Full Half Assmt. Units No of Dwelling Units F.Y. 85/86 425 422/211 636 No. of Dwelling Units Annexed 85/86 458_ 128/.64 522 30 of Dwelling Units to be As;essed in F Y 86/87 883 55012-75 1433/1158 Total Estimated Cost $14d.67C.00 $12P.34 110. of ssmt.. Units 1158 .5- 's+- D. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 No. of Square Feet in Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 5 24.000 No. of Square Feet Maintained In Fiscal Year 85/86 24.300 Projected No. of Square Feet to be Maintained in 86/87 24.000 Projected Expenditures Estimated Revenue $6,760.00 Less Estimated Expenditures $2,987.00 - Projected Reserve at Fiscal Year End _ $3,773.00 These funds will be used for Reserves for cash flow and unusual maintenance casts 1965/86 1986/87 Contract Services $2.000.00 $2.721.00 Electric 100.00 300.00 Water 400.00 _ 1.100.00 Labor 100.00 270.00 Materials 100.00 100.00 Equipment 50.00 100.00 Assessment Admin. 7w- 237.00 349.00 t„y General Liability Total Estimated 50.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $2.987.00 $4.990.00 Estimated Revenue $6,760.00 Less Estimated Expenditures $2,987.00 - Projected Reserve at Fiscal Year End _ $3,773.00 These funds will be used for Reserves for cash flow and unusual maintenance casts SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagram is attached to this report. Detailed diagrams of each tract are rncluded in the various District Formation and Annexation reports. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. Lot dimensions are as shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in records of County Recorder. -6- /9 -5- Full Half No. of Dwelling Units F.Y. SS /86 44 -0- No. of Dwelling Units Mnexed 85/66 4- -0- No. of Dwelling units to be Assessed in F Y. 86/87 _44 -O- Total Estimated Cost $4.9 ^0.00 $113.41 No, o ssmt. Un is 4 SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagram is attached to this report. Detailed diagrams of each tract are rncluded in the various District Formation and Annexation reports. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. Lot dimensions are as shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in records of County Recorder. -6- /9 -5- TOTAL ASSESSABLE UNITS 1986187: 12029 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 • 4313 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 • 1160 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 8 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 • 1158 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 44 ANNEXATION SUMMARY (1985/86) 150 11853 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Full Assmt H0 f Assmt. Tract /Bev. Units Units 12588 22 12028 12029 35 12030 30 12031 16 12532 111 12077 16 12077 -2 8 10210 33 12830 103 12801 -2 32 12922 308 11915 150 11853 72 12650 -1 61 _ 386 607 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Conversions) Full Assmt. Half Assmt. Tract Dev. Units Units 12833 117 O J� Tro- I v a Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Full Assmt. Half Assmt. Tract /Dev. Units Units 12672 128 12590 31 12319 25 12319 -1 25 12319 -2 22 12319 -3 30 12319 -4 37 12319 -5 35 12319 -6 39 12319 -7 27 12319 -8 34 12670 25 12670 -1 24 12670.2 31 12670 -3 39 12670 -4 34 522 128 SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvements for the entire districts are found to be of general benefit to all lots within each District. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the appropriate District. 1966/87 ASSESSMEMTS 85/86 86187 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 $33.00 $28.00 per assessment unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 $223.77 $223.77 per assessment un!t Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 $ 0 258.75 er assessment unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 $154.10 $128.34 oer assessment unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 S163.64 $113.41 er assessment unit l 0 C WS 31 s`^ 3t s� a.: 2 t_ re s e 2 Q c C s a s a i a �r W S $ AL 3Y g s< a 3 ti a � a a 9 s a e l �a s o e ,V IN t a� a s �E a: 2: Q VV �N � a s l �a LT r l WI :s S a� Q � t 5e N a r a Y 0 0 . | GI z) | !} k f d � |� | :$ ! ! £ \ �I § }|§ /3 � 2 � � e.� �! � e /3 ES § }|§ /3 � 2 � � s` 3� 9 a- Q G Y x a Y a "a x o � i n 3 Sw6 °n Y NN w •OC TO Y T S , , 0 I ! !� �z ; i / § !am � �R �!! 2 �! !a � � X378 !!� NM !• Me I :�' ; i / § !am � �R �!! 2 s3 �5 a aa" ie E a: aC as •C ego` •cYy 1/ 19 3rs;r- I �a 4 1 •j� a� g F N r0 a aa" ie E a: aC as •C ego` •cYy 1/ 19 3rs;r- I �a 4 1 •j� RESOLUTION NO. ft-- wOBIt ?(p —ILi0 A RESL,.UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHu CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTR!CT NO 1, LANDSCAPE NAINTEIIANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, LANDSCAPE HAINTEIUUICE DISTRICT NO. 4, AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for wnich assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvement of said Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with tiie City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Cod'aWT has duly considered said report and each and—'x every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report iz sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that: 1. The Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses In connection therewith, contained in said report be, cnd each of them are hereby preliminarily appro%rd and confirmed. 2 The diagrams shoeing the Assessment Districts referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. The proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1986.87 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. 1f7 r. RESOLUTION NO.-00"H -W& 94- -13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1986 -87 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work That the public interest and convenience requ r and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within 'Wdscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 for the fiscal year 1986 -87 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance df:trict described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation Includes the cost and supervision of parkway maintenance (including sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls, and related facilities) in connection with said parks and parrkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work The foregoing described work is to be located w ti n of roadway r gray and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled °Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance Districts Mos. 1, 2, 3, 4,and 5'. SECTION 3. Desert Lion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor , 1n t.Wt op n on o sa ty Council. is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Landndscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5- indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. 199 Reference is hereby made to said maps for further. full and ndre particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on f•le shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. SECTION 4. _Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution Ho. b - 21 -08R has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. the report titled 'Annual Engineer's Report, Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2 3, 4, and 5' is or file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION B. Time and Place of Hearin • Notice is hereby given that on the 4ttKi 3a-7-07 June, 1986, at the he of 7:30 p.m, in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any abjections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may arpear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why asses3mv11tsg. should not be levied and collected for fiscal : year 1986 -87 Protests musr-%t in writing and must contain a description of 3' the property in which each signer thereof Is Interested, sufficient to Identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of se id City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equallztd assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer Is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htln Act of 1972: All the work herein propose all a one an rarr ed through n pu ^suance of an act of the legislature of the State ^f California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. being D -sion 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be masuant to Section 61961 -of the Gcierrudeft Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once In The nail Ro oorrt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntari0 "o, CaTi�rnia, and circulated In the City of Rancho Cuc.monga, California. 197 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: (lay 21, 1986 G�= b TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution of Approval of Lighting Districts' Preliminary En Sneer's Report and the Resolution Declarl na Intent on to Levy and Collect Assessments and Set Public Hearing Date for June 4, 1986. EVALUATION: Presently, four lighting districts are within the City of Rancho Cucamonga's b6pbdaries. They are Lighting District No. 1 (Arterial), Lig"fiting District No. 2 (Residential), Lighting District Nu. 3 (Victoria), and Lighting District No. 4 (Terra Vista). Annually, Council is presented with a Preliminary Engineer's Report and a Resolution Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments, and set Public Hearing date This is pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Lighting District No. 1 and No. 2's projected assessments for fiscal year 1986/87 will be lower than fiscal year 1985,86 assessments. Lighting District No. 3's assessments will remain unchanged. Lighting District No 4's assessments will experience an increase in fiscaa year 1986/87. The attached Preliminary Engineer's Report will provide an analysis of these four lighting districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council adopts the Resolution of Prelim - Inary Approval of the Lighting Districts' Engineer's Report, and the Resolution Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments, and set Public Hearing date for June 4, 1986. spECyful Submi ted, /r V�9 -i:= obert Rizzo Assistant City Manager RR: JBF:kmm - Qoo CITY Oi RANCHO CUCAMONGA I986 -87 Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Districts 1, 2, 3 and 4 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The report deals with the projected costs for Fiscal Year 1985 -86 and the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1986 -87 of the following maintenance districts for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Street Lighting District No. 1 Strggt,Llghting DSstrict No. 2 stree77CCLighting District No. 3 Street Lighting Cistrict No. 4 Lights to be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report. The total number of lights within said Street Lighting Districts are as follows: Street Lighting District Ho. 1 Street lighting District No. 2 Street Lighting District No. 3 Street Lighting District No. 4 464 Arterial Lights 6 r Local Lights Vfctoria 333 Lights Terra Vista--3T2 Lights Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of street light improvements. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall :,e divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Street lighting was constructed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulat.d in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location if the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighti I Improvement on the individual dovelopment ar_ hereby made a part of this repot to the save extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. ,DO/ z� Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. - SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred fer street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historic data, estimated maintenance costs for fiscal year 1986 -87 are as follows; Street Lighting Maintenance Distrtct No 1 (Arterial) A. Number and Types of Lamps in District 1985/86 Lamas 1985/86 Annexations 1986/87 21500 22000L 16000L 9500L —TO-2 —" 5800E 95 113 0 TOTAL �W�r B. Number of Units in District 1985/86 Units 1985/86 Annexations 1/9-986//87 1. 2608 5009 7617 .5 C Projected Expenditures Ex enditures: 1985 86 1986/81 Ma ntenance epair $2.638 7TT9; Southern California Edison 27,3 ?5 53,496 Administration 1.112 3.745 Total Estimated Cost 31 065 64 434 D. California Edisons Maintenance Rates Lamps 1985/86 1986/87 yariences 27500L 22000L 3:15 T3-.-BT- 16000L 11.69 12.08 .59 .39 93ODL 9.95 10.16 .21 5800L 8.82 8.93 .11 E. Estimated Financial Status at June 30, 1986 Estimated Revenues $34,378 Less Estimated Expenditures 31 065 plus prior year reserve 9 131 -• equal the projected funds at scat ear End in the amount of 2 4 These funds will be used for reserves against unusual expenses an or nanry maintenance. .Dd is F. Fiscal Year 1986.87 Assessment Calculations -amps Quantity Rates Cost 27500L 22000L 160001 9500E 29r— 0.16 5800L 208 _ 8y93 1,857.44 TOTAL $4.458.40 x 12 53 501 TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED COSTS: • 1985/87 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT UNITS NO. OF N 53501 • 3745 • $57246 - $7.52 7617 G Assessment Comparison 1985/86 1986/87 increase Decrease) Assessments $8.91 $7.52 $1.39) 168 Decrease Street Lichting Maintenance District No. 2 (Residential) A. Number and Types of Lamps in District Lamps 1985 /86 Annexations 1986/87 27500L 22000L _ 16000L 9500L 58COL 25T- 399 6T1— Less Tract 12414 Not n District) _24 Total 62/ _T B. Number of Units in District Units 1985 86 Annexations 1986187 1. 764 1638 240Z .5 - - - Less Tract 12414 (Not in District) - 92 ' Total 2310 t. i Pi{ Pi, i &.1 - 003 _T M C. Projected Expenditures Ex" 1985L�86 1986 87 ._ a ntenance and Reoalr Z,fbO 2, Southern Califurnia Edison 38,642 67,415 Administration 1.189 4.719 fetal Estimated Cost $41,931 574.192 D. California Edisons Maintenance Rates La 1985/86 1985 86 � 1986 87 � Variances 27500L .99 220001. 13.25 13.84 .59 16500L 11.69 12.08 .39 9fOOL 9.95 10.16 .21 SBOOL 8.82 8.96 .11 E. Estimated Financial Status at June 30, 1985 Estimated Revenues 34 819 Less Estimated Expenditures $41,931 plus prior year reserves 10 6. equal the projected reserves at Fiscal Tear Tss- End in the amount of These funds will be used for ordinanry maintenance F. Fiscal Year 1986/87 Assessment Calculations Lams Quantity 215001 Rates Cost 22000L 16000L 9500E 58COL 62T— ---.9 ,61 .92 x 12 67,415 TOTAL ANNUAL ESTINATEO COSTS: - 1986 /87 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT N T- 67.415 + 4719 • $72,134 • $31.23 3 0 G. Assessment Comparison 1985/86 Assessments 3 .22 1986/87 33 Doi Increase Decrease 4.9 i �l 1x Street Lighting Maintenance District Mo. 3 (Victoria A. Number and Types of Lamps to District Lamps 1985 186 Annexations 1986187 27500L 27�001. —IT.'T2 22000L 22000L 16000L 13.84 .59 9500E 11.69 12.08 5800L 333 9500L 333 B. N•wber of Units in District .21 5800L Units 1985 86 Annexations 1986187 1 Financial Status at June 30. 1986 45 .5 Revenues $35,286 Less Estimated Expenditures 37 241 plus C. Projected Expenditures the projected reserves at is ca Year End Expenditures 1985/86 1986/87 Maintenance and repair?y $805 $805 My Southern California Edison 35.244 35.804 Administration 1.192 2.506 Total Estimates Cost $37,241 $39,115 0. California Edisons Maintenance Rates Lamos 1985/86 1986/87 Variances 27�001. —IT.'T2 13=. 22000L 13.25 13.84 .59 16000L 11.69 12.08 .39 9500L 9.95 10.16 .21 5800L 8.82 8.96 .11 E. Estimated Financial Status at June 30. 1986 Estimated Revenues $35,286 Less Estimated Expenditures 37 241 plus prior year reserve 1 5 equal the projected reserves at is ca Year End In the amount of 512,796 . These funds will be used for reserves against F. Fiscal Year 1986/87 Assessment Calculations Lamps Quantity Rates Cost 27500L 22000L 160ODL 9500L 5800L 333 8.96 2.983.68 X 12 35 804. 6 E a TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATE" COSTS • 19u6/87 ANNUAL ASSESSNERT NM 5 13.25 11.69 9.95 8.82 13.84 12.08 'J.16 8.96 35,804 + 2506 - 2064 • 136,246 • $48.65 4 G. Assessment Comparisons Assessments 1985/86 198687 Increase(Decrease) $48.5 .65 -D- Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista) A. Number and Type of Lamps in District Lamps 27500L 1985/86 Annexations 1986/87 2260CL — --' 16000E — 9500L 63 5800L -r30 — --TF9— 'rg R. Number of Units in DistriLIlpf Units 1985-86 Annexations 1986!87 458 883 .5 422 128 275 IB C. Projected Expenditures Ex�endlt�ures 1985'86 1986.81 a nM i tenance and repair '—g- o� Southern California Edison 19,506 34,598 Administration 1.192 2.422 Total Estimated Cost 21394 3i-966 0. California Edison Maintenance Rates Lamps 21600E 119"85M .32 19W87 1S.'3i Variances --. ff- 22000L 160ODL 9500L 58001. 13.25 11.69 9.95 8.82 13.84 12.08 'J.16 8.96 .59 .39 .21 .11 E. Estimated Financial Status at June 30, 1986 Estimated Revenues $16,889 Less Estimated Expenditures $21 394 plus prior year reserve -0- Equal the projected reserves at sca ear End in the amount of (4505. These funds will be used for N/A ; a ?J,. F. Fiscal Year 1986/87 Assessment Calculations Laps Quantitj Rates Cost ' 275COL 22000E 1985/86 1986/87 16000L —� �— —POKOB 9500L 63 10.16>T- District SSOOL (Residential) 8.96 2 231.04 Lighting District No. 3 320 48.65 48.65 Lighting x 12 No. 4 (Terra Vista) 27.14 34.598.40 TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED COSTS: - 1986 /87 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT NO. OF UNITS IN Dr1-TRTZT-- 34,598 + 2422 + 3000 • $40,020 $34.56 ,,S8 G. Assessment Comparison _1985/86 1986/87 Increase Decrease Assessments $37 T4V1t X34.56 �z 27% Increase TOTAL ASSESSABLE UNITS 1985/86 1986/87 Lighting District No. 1 (Arterial) 2608 /617 Lighting District No. 2 P,esidcntial) 764 2310 Lighting District No. 3 Victoria) 745 745 Lighting District No. 4 Terra Vista) 636 1158 SECTION S. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the Master Assessment diagram for each district is attached to this report. Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated with the text of this report. (Assessment Diagrams are on file in the City Clerk's office). ao7 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 1985/86 1986/87 Lighting District No. 1 (Arterial) 8.91 Lighting District No. 2 (Residential) 36.22 31.23 Lighting District No. 3 (Victoria) 48.65 48.65 Lighting District No. 4 (Terra Vista) 27.14 34.56 TOTAL ASSESSABLE UNITS 1985/86 1986/87 Lighting District No. 1 (Arterial) 2608 /617 Lighting District No. 2 P,esidcntial) 764 2310 Lighting District No. 3 Victoria) 745 745 Lighting District No. 4 Terra Vista) 636 1158 SECTION S. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the Master Assessment diagram for each district is attached to this report. Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated with the text of this report. (Assessment Diagrams are on file in the City Clerk's office). ao7 STREET LI6NTIN5 DISTRICT N0. I Tract 10491 9539 9584 9584 -1 9584 -2 10569 9683 11350 11609 9441 11696 10762 10277 -1 9269 11663 12019 12020 12021 12022 12040 9658 11734 12090 10045 10045 -1 12023 12024 12025 12184 11173 -1 11173 11144 12237 12237 -1 12237 -2 12305 Ortginal Formtion and Annexations Tract 11797 12320 -1 11013 12490 9399 9400 12414 11915 -1 11549 -1 12362 12026 12027 O.R. 83.17 10035 12588 x'12029 12030 12031 12532 10277 10277 -2 12670, 12670 -1 11915 11853 12922 12801 -2 12650 -1 D.R. 84 -t1 P.H. 9318 P.N. 9204 12672 12319. 123I9 -3 11781 12739 12741 11893 .- a Tract P.M. 7827 12365 11035 12320 thru 4 12490 11606 -1 10046 10047 12721 9619 12362 12621 12091 thru 8 11625 12740 12772 -1 12801 -1 12590 -1 thru 6 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 2 12237 -2 11013 9399 9400 12414 11549 -1 12588 �s- Original Fornation and Annexations Tract Tract Tract 10491 12532 12530 9539 12830 12238 9584 10230 12523 9584 -1 12801 -2 11577 9584 -2 12922 P.N. 7827 10569 12650 -1 123209 9638 O.R. 84 -51 11606 -1 11609 P.N. 9318 10046 9441 9619 10047 11696 12772 -1 12621 9269 12525 12739 9658 !2740 12741 10045 '�+' 12893 12801 -1 10045 -1 10035 12237 -2 11013 9399 9400 12414 11549 -1 12588 �s- STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 3 Original Formation and Annexations Tract 11934 12044 12045 12046 Ito Annexations STREET LIGHTING DISCTRICT NO. 4 Original Formation and Annexations Tract 12316 12316 -1 12317 12317 -1 12364 12364 -1 17364 12402 12590 12596 -1 thru 6 12670 12670 -1 thru 4 12319 12319 -1 thru 8 s- _ d�d ; RESOLUTION 80. !99- tt-t%, S (p" I LI/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOk STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, STREET LIGHTING MAINTEWANCE DISTRICT NO. 2. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improveient of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration, and WHEREAS, 3 1 Council has 3uly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that: 1 The Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. The diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to ar described in Salo report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and conflrmed. 3. The proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1986 -87 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. .i f / •r RESOLUTION N0, t!li.li -iER %. -13 8 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING RIOT NO. 1, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. HTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 FOR THE 15 -87 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND 1972. AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR IS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follo •,: SECTION 1. Desert iton of Mork That the public interest and convenience require an t s t e ntent on of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within l reet Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,� - and 4 for the fiscal year 86 -87 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance And operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work The foregoing described work is to be located witf-irn—roadway r g- - t=o7 -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file to the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 40. SECTION 3. Descri lion of Assessment District: That the contempla eid woTin the op n on o sa CIE Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assesse9 to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines show, upon that certain 'Map of Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Hos. 1, 2, 3, and 4' indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory Included within each assessment district and which maps is on file to the office of the City Clerk of said City. �cL .r Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all deta,is as to the extent of said assessment districts. SECTION 4. Re ort of En lneer: The City Council of said City by Resolution o. 0 -21 -0 as approve the report of the engineer of work which report Indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. the report titled 'Anrual Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Hos. 1, 2 3, and 4• is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin • Notice is hereby given that Chambers tart 9161 baseaLine. �1n CtheeCityrof Rancho Cucamonga, any and Council persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or year 11986-87. Protestssmu�nsJ� ,besh^ulwdlL;�gbandemusZ cted fiscal the property in which eau signer thereof Is Interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of Wd City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest 1s not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernrrdino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such pro•est must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer 1s the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and 1f htfn Act of 1972: 411 the work herein propose shall be one an carr ed t rougA n pursuance of sn act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Oivision 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice ;hall be ma -3e pursuant to ectron 9 o t e vernment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall :ause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Vail Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published fr. the City of ntar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. �/3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May Zl. 1986 TOs City Council PROM: Richard M. Dabl Mayor Pro Tom S08]ICT: Minimum Lot Sizes for single Family Detached and Zero Lot Line Housing CONC$gq: Presently our City has several large tracts and trLet maps filed for small lot subdivisions from 3000 sq ft to 45C0 sq ft. To date. not one of these subdivisions demonstrate innovative design. Instead they utilize a cookie - cutter lot configuration that in the opinion of may vill prove detrimental to the City. PROPOSAL: get a 6000 sq ft minimum on all single family detached and zero lot line devulopments. Allow smaller lot subdivisions by use of a COP providing the map demonstrates an innovative lot configuration that allows for the marimm use of each lot and may be aesthetically pleasing. (Proper recreation facilities, set backs, etc.). Staff vill provide samples of innovative designs to form me ideal criteria for recommendation for a COP. RMDSbaa i D/V CITY OF RANCHO C1 T UIONGA STAFF RErORT DATE: May 21, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner ral Im SUBJECT: PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO MULTI - FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ULVELOPMENI I. BACKGROUND: At the May 7, 1986 meeting, the City Council discussed po e—E nEial—modifi i s to apartment development standards, and requested staff W- repave draft revisions to existing ordinances as follows: 1. Bring apartment standards in line with condominium standards (except for subdivision requirements). 2. Consider establishment of minimum dwelling unit sizes for all types of dwellings, single and multiple family. 3. Consider modification of parking standards for all multifamily units to include requirements for enclosed garages. All of these changes require adoption by Ordinance and modifications to the City's Development Code. These modifications must first be reviewed by the City's Planning Commission. These three items can be handled separately, or all at once, but public hearings before the Planning Commission are required prior to final Council action. For the purposes of obtaining specific direction from the City Council, these I, ts are presented separately in this report. Ii MODIFICATION OF APARTMENT STANDARDS: At the previous meeting, the City Council expressed a desire to make apartment standards identical to condominiums, except for provisions dealing with subdivision of land. w < �7 S i ' City Council Staff Report Proposed Modifications May 21, 1986 Page 2 This would require that Section 17.12.040 of the Development Code be modified in accordance with Exhibit OP. attached for your consideration. This change would eliminate difterences between apartment and condo standards in the Development Code by increasing current parking standards for apartment projects. (However, this change would not affect covered parking requirements or minimum unit sizes; these issues: are addressed separately in the following sections of this report.) III. MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZES: Current City regulations do not specify minimutm dwelling unit size for multiple family construction (condominium or apartment). Single family structures have a minimum size requirement of 900 square feet. However♦ smaller single family homes may be permitted subject to a Conditeal Use Permit. `74w The Council's direction was to consider establishment of minimum dwelling unit standards. Staff was directed to pattern a draft minimum size ordinance after that of the City of Upland. The Upland standards currently in effect are outlined below: UPLAND Unit Size ZONE Family Z— ones MIN. LOT AREA --( 5 . ft.) 20,000 MIN. D/U SIZE s-q. {�— 2,000 RS=lYe O R -S-15 15,000 1,800 R -S -10 10,000 1,600 R -S -7.5 7,500 1,400 R -S-6 6,000 900 Mu1ti.pVy Zones ac I 30,000 1,000!du R -M -3.6 (12 du /ac) 15,000 1,000 /du R -H-2.0 (20 du /ac) 16,000 1,00f.du R -M-1.5 (30 du /ac) 7,500 1,000 1du 500 - Bachelor 700 - 1 Bdrm 800 - 2 Bdrm 1,000 - 3 Bdrm (Special) pew cial) 900 Iq. ft. for a Bedroom plus 200 sv. ft. for additional Bedroom -Vr6 city Council Staff Report Proposed Modifications May 21, 1986 Page 3 unit seleiZ�s Upland Ordinance es minimum foot minim= ase on Elie of lot. Thus homes are required on half -acre lots, goo square foot minimum on of�thestructure This has the to the sizecofaitsoloot. size In staff's opinion, the real impact of these regulations is in smaller lots /smaller hose size of the spectrum. As the area of the and i c dwelling unit sizes resultofmarprice. atfores. As a ult the vastmajority of homes built on half -acre lots in Rancho Cucamonga exceed 2,000 square feet. Multi -Farm Zones- The Upland Ordinance calls for 1,000 square Toot m n moo we units 1n all multi- family zones up to 20 units per acre. Th R-M -1.5 District (30 units per acre) permits ?y units smaller ouster ,0 0 squa arre feet, depending on the type units a of POTENTIAL STANDARDS FORS �fMONGA: The following standards are patterned on the Upland Ordinance. However, Rancho Cucamonga's lot sizes or density designatior,s are not identical to Uoland's; consequentiy, minimum dwelling unit size has been adjusted accordingly, to allow for different density def i ni ti uis. SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS DISTRICT 1414. AVE. LOT AREA MINIMUM D/ t: 0 SIZE Vt. 22,500 2,000 L 8 000 1,400 LM 6,000 900 MULTI- FAMILY DISTRICTS DISTRICT DENSITY l:IN. O/U SIZE shy. M.. i LM 4-8 DO/AC 1,000 1,000 M B-14 Du /Ac 900 MH 14 -24 Du /Ac 24 -30 Du /Ac Soo _ 1 udiio aid 1,M = i E9.-A City Council Staff Report Proposed Modifications May 21, 1986 Page 4 IV. MODIFICATIONS TO PARKING STANDARDS Currently, one (1) covered parking spice p:r unit in a garage or carport is required for multi- family projects. The Council has expressed concerns that garages may be preferable to carports for the required covered parking for a variety of reasons includipg aesthetics and public safety. Staff has reviewed parking standards in the area. The requirements for other cities in the area aee noted below. In addition to open parking, the following covered spaces are required: Upland: Condos - 2 spaces /unit in a garage Apartments - most restr!ctive zone requires 2 spaces /unit in a garage or carport Chino: All Wti- family residential - 1 space /unit in a is garage or carport Ontario: All multi- family residential - 1 space /unit in garage or carport Montclair: All multi - family residential - 2 spaces /unit in garage ISSUES: The following issues have been identified by staff for Council's consideration: 1. Public Safety - Staff has contacted the Sheriff's Department relative to the issue of personal /property safety rates for garages versus carports in mdlti- family projects. The Sheriff's Department stated that the differences between garages and carports do not appear significant from the public safet- perspective. Although a locked garage is more secure than an open carport, many people utilize their garages for other purposes such storage and continue to park in the open, often in public streets. 2. Functionality - Although garages are intended to store cars, they are often used for other purposes such as storage, and the cars are parked in front of the garage, in the driveway or on the street. This is particularly •ue of smaller units where storage may be inadequate. This may have the effect of actually reducing the number of open spaces available for parking. ave . 5r City CounNl Staff Report Proposed Modifications May 21, 1986 Page 5 VI. 3 Aesthetics - Enclosed garages can be more aesthetically pleasing than carports, both for how the structure itself appears and for reducing the number of automobiles visible on site. However, isles of garages in a multiple family development can also create a negative visual impact along the circulation corridors of the project. The design and layout of either garages or carports needs to be carefully reviewed with each project. 4. Cost - The constriction of enclosed garages instead of carports represents an additional cost. The BIA estimates the builder's cost of a garage at about $2350 per space, vs. approximately $850 per space for carports. It should be noted that these figures vary widely depending on design, materials, number of units, topography, etc. �% Alternatives for multi - family parking requirements include: 1. Current requirements remain in place - one covered space to a garage or carport. 2. Requirement of one space to garage - remaining spaces Duly be in garage, or uncovere . 3 Requirement of all parking (except guests) in garages - no carports permitted. Another option which the Council may wish to consider is to require garages in the lower density multi - family ranges such as Low Medium and Medium and to use the existing requirements of one covered space /unit in a garage or car ort for higher density residential such as Medium High and g ers All of the modifications discussed in this report require public hearings by the Planning Cnmission. Staff should be directed to prepare a complete analysis and report for the Planning Commission's consideration on any or all of the following items: 1. Modifications of apartment standards for consistency with condominium standards. 2. Establishment of minimum duelling unit sizes for: a. Single Family b. Multi- Family c. All Residential except Senior Housing ai9 �j City Council Staff Report Proposed Modifications May 21, 1286 Page 6 3. Modifications of parking standards for multi - family housing to require: 1. Current requirements 2. Requirement of one space in a oerage. 3. Requirement of all parking (except guests) in garages. Respectfully submitted, Brad Butter City Planner BB:OK:jr Attach•:nt m d •, i Section 1712A40 l�t/ZJ Section 1712.040 FaLWM Rreoitements The fpRowing sectlons list the required amount of parking for each category of uses, special requirements and optional requirements. A. Resideutial 1. Singla -famiy detached dwellings (conventionall. Two (2) par dng spaces within a gsre�,e. i4pA2TNFJ.IT'S� Iv1ULTl- F4 NIL 2, ant (condominlum, towsdome, otm Sams etached single family (zero lot Una, patio homes, duplexes, etc.) and mobile home perks: (a) Studios 1.3 off - street parking space per unit of which one space shall be In a garago or carport. (b) owl (1) bedroom: 1.5 off - street parking Spam per unit of which one spare Shan be In a garage or carport. (c) Two (2) bedrooms: 1.3 off_3treet pal king spaced per unit of which one space shall be,�,a garage or carport (d) Three (3) or more bedrooms: Two off - street Vrkisg rapes Per unit of which one Q-e shall be in a garage or carport. (a) In additf.m to the tnquired.ninub nee of s ar dun. pr ecas for for each unit, one off- street uncovemd g sP units f.r visitor parking- For single family zero lot line, patio homes, and where Plsufsflelent ttstreet rpavement ewidth Land dstansee between drive Rays has been provided. U) For developments contalnLig five or mcce units, up to thirty-five (35) percent o: the required uncovered spaces may be compact car size. (g) The use of .cerports requires approval from the Design Review Committee. - -iav� Sik iP�°C"talaw6-0i- tha.aaqut �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 21, 1936 —isrr TO: Mayor and Hea92rs of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller. City Planner SUBJECT: RECOW i)ATIDM OF APPOIMTMENIS TO THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN TJ WC CWHEE On May 7, 1936, the City Council recommended the appointment of seven members to s,.rve as the Ad !ix Committee for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plin. After sane discussion, it was directed that each Councllaeebir submit two additional names for the Subcommittee's consideration and that ommendatton be brought back before the Council at their May MAN As of this report, the Subcommittee has not been able to meet and consider the names submitted. Therefore, the Subcommittee will present their recommendations to the Council at their May 21st meeting. BB /jr rk Ak 71: :ILL �OL1 •� •; !l. .� .� wL .l ar] - ]...a' Suzanne CMtiea Planning Commissioner and Resident (Alta Lama) Tom Kohl Building Industry for both Commercial and Residential Paul Saldana CAC member, Resident (Cucamonga) Linda Eddy Resident (near Foothill) Debra Brown Resident (Etiwanda) Jeff Sceranka - Clamber Xeeber and Businessman Jim Keller Property Owner and Businessman on Foothill Boulevard aa3 5 ouatecN 00. cd 9 AM DmnuC9 or StS CISS CWMCM of nt CIrt of Nuct0 -_ CUCAMMCA. CALIFORNIA, monc CtAPM 8,18 SD Sit LVC30 CUCAXWCA MUNICIPAL Co0t CMCmn0 CCMImCILL YD 3003711.0E IM31 COLUCTIO It hereby is aNelaad by the Cottcil of the City of Rambo Onaecals u fellorst ummu. Chgsar 8.18 hereby to added to the :he Cact.agt m nlcipal Code to read .e fotlwu aCh.pttr 8.18 COwnnaC sae nXORmler. •.maR C.al tend DAC11aat 8.18.013 1 ;61ctbe policy. 8.18.020 Delfaltlens. 8.11.010 Authority of Ca acil to Islas p"to for collection cad disposal. 8.18.040 Permits for r.faee cell *$ties e.d utcblicbrst of collertloa I.... 8.18.010 Oeln,al collertiaa. 8.18.0604r Intloa 1. cacgocin. 8.18.010 'lim. of collettles. 8.18.0m Raises cellust /o.-- Splllm.. 8.18.090 4f..s Receptacles. 8.18.100 plecsalat of r.ropt"Ies far tollertioo. 8.11.110 Ref au resarel. 8.18.110 Ref..• disposal. 8.11.110 Specl.l p ori.iasa rog,W.g allied of disposal. 8.11.140 Wardell .sate. 8.11.170 N.miag. burial or dotpI.S. 8.18.160 Dvatlos of a *$.1e. 8.11.170 Use of track,. 8.18.180 No pawat 4 tells, trachm oa M city street. 8.11.190 ltdpaasc ralalrad. 8.18.200 Speaificeciens sad ruttictieas m call*$tien track,. 6.11.210 Sack i..petlea. 8.18.220 Pem,traea local tel.Pheas amber. 8.18.270 Caortlel .ad ladactri.l fetus collsetius are... 8.10.140 P.ewttai s usploysas. 1.18.170 Permit for .eausel of t f.crh...gaWtes. 8.18.260 f odt pusiniou. 8.10.270 Right. of Rate.l&, collectors. 8.15.180 Charge. for .mica. 1.11.290 tnsrab /liar. RAl 10 t..l.l.rh. pelt.., She City Caaacil of the City of Nawbe Cocamage does hereby tied .M deteraloe that stor st. actealLtius. callectieo .ad dlsaolsl of rele.e. Cush. mbbA►, solid outs. de0ri. aad ether d1mNe! antericl is a .attar of Crest public custom, 1. chat iaprepr control of es,► oaturC treat*$ a publit aalauce. nblcb sq laid to air pllatioa, free hats *$e, illegal detolog. luact breeding end sat imRearatiou and ether publeal of tertlag the bsalth, -.14n .ad Cafet7 of the residents at GnAn CLcat<gs tad nrroaadlep cities, The City Comcil forth" declsree that rq.letiou is this chapter prnidad to deaiNead to Qlaluta or Mellott sus probl.al aatl 0.4l.aee. so, 291 fat. 2 s.lLU ndlALLL..,. For the porpety of thin chapter. the tellwlq words fed phrases are defiled and ebell he cC..truld as h,,LLveftur� at wt, eslm it Is eppaavt from the eextent that d dlffstn.t wanes one leteededt A- tztui v „r, - was .aura. tatlliser, or top term of solid ncrauat Produced by sap ad all fora of dawstic Wrlh or Cc —mill livestock. i L Ctli - Calls the City of saurhe (5.cawga. C. CC” n,rw - was. be City Clerk of the City of Ruch. Covawga. 0. tlru w,_..,. _ "us the city nemeses of the city of Rurbe beameg4. t. C.— 'a,I .. 12dulr1,l rrr..lt e - chall Caes for the pepehee of fhb chats all Carom -•a /LL ¢W SWottreta LLat ialndloe the rellwlns. bat let ruaelat" to retail ad co"Bl LL. etnwe, tHes, seater• ataa, baepltab. restalesaaet ►owe. Co. epe traction rtesLl, ht alt, reel h, nItsorasa, e" .Ld.a i.1 or iwcaor. not er $,I? o Ql Its ¢peadesM resida.1 Co as tef1sM y Ogtas said of the touch* beaCaga thedelpsl C "e. f. C..,t...•t.. u.r•rol - kall Caste all Wert. mutarlel sad rb few the .eastruetive, alaative, royal, varlet na -'� -ti- Iltlos of boilditg or Kodactloa and d.aslopat of praparty 'of real estate or, eamrnlal ep.eb, eostractoa, or saw"torlq prwa, rbucb rte baled by the utilb.tics at roll -off . eceptacle " toy *that type of enclosed receptacle. 0. Council - ""a the city Council at the city of r...be Cacawga. L a....a... v,.r. _ fbe tan haatde.. rasa .ball Laclede catrewly Location. .ute or btectiou sate es such Carr rtes datiu" by the California Rate d tsf.ty Cod. auction 25100 at ant. or sat Curb 16 Wined by all cosLLaa/aa. Korlleted .ads, tkese sections or by the seats wp.rtwnt of RLLtb p.nlcay. I. okra... to - rat. a" Lucia,, carry Cava of. sad "a1 Cannot of porous who is b poaa.toa of. er has the cae and control at.. ewrnlLL er industrial esrublbhret. J. p.r..•r„ - walls any refuge collector authorized by the city Council of the City of sa,be focussed. to collect tofu&, rithis the city pursuant to thin Qaster 8.18. K- !anon - ar n." in this cbaptw was, a" individual, fin. rerpostles, asheciaties, er Kwp or combination acting an a wit. L. 121044 - lheiaaa any and all types of rubbish. trash er .row vat4 uterial referred to is tkis Chapter gtig, a- .-n.,. r.v,r•" _ ran sot 11ruas er p.au, fin, cotaetsarstlp, Lola Weaturn, ocaociatles or tarpratiu asset" 14 t; collective, traepratios aa/1a, 41,111.1 of ,lid ... e .ad,. rubbish is the city, 77)� Outoaucs go. 291 pat. 1 t, y hhlA - lariats', but is set restricted Co. all ace -b Latedable stereo or debris each as "Par, cardboard, trust tree or ebrub trimioao, toss, at.es. clothin. rood, or seed products. ctodsr7. this. falter• rtat. Pluti" cee.t,ectios oust Ll led dtlris wed etbat alorlac "ferule c, ..aeLY Otswa,t Operator - is .7so.7m" with Iaitaa collector, p, c&tv fA - lacledso eabblab. ftm vbicb etticiss Of awl" of "ratio] of Valay m7 be mtr"ted. sear"Ot d. rammed of d"elepd. Q, fend tale - iscledes all patraeclble sad sou- "triacbalid oat saor -lelq veto. lack '-fee-- r.ea, rulbiab, NP en y }. Ataaata -crass the Public Tenn, vote add 411.706 mnpt state ever .7y a the ear um or "t befeafter mist with!• the city. a. ICUh- lecladess but to It rutricfed to, "try "ceslatlou of &alma, vgatabl• or •that "Social. 1 n.alti.a fro the praparatios and ceesa"tios of edible foedataifal or 1 r.wItIn tam delay, dwin L or es ".a* of met$. am. teal, tr dti or vnotabls', letlaUes the cue, useful "."eNro Wasted ales, with s"b sitar Isle] or -r '7 ]. stab Scientist. da"atic ..d eraaeic let-" cc Valid" oF}' avi "le sold for "all of d. fruit, vegetable wed 4orml "flat from bitebu.• dining room, "costs, food I Lhmu or say aft�ttorn. staei.hl.slossa[oru trerh.adlin "etas ti.%. S. offal. miml -,-to or the care ."s of Wells. fish or twit of .oata.7clule {lass. "Par of "t.l protons. 1. J'A - mass a.7 track, trailer, #"{trailer, eon .7aace er eakiele also or lau.a.d fe hat aced tee the Pmeee o[ cellelaln, raise- er to Ural of tra.sport rattle. ralt,fn", paceeas[ to IKti" 6,t at he calif ... is c"arsm.it Cody the rruosa shall two esh authority K that term et .al" seats . tPT "!d A flap -.at is .fees. .rats. tea is m t Ater ced sego " ♦ ceadltlos ter b•sthet its' pact"• to issue e teed tram faithful "sort"• A as riot" d•t•[.i&ad by disposal al.7 Sze it to rd$ "t the fthis chapter pter I"ath of each "71Kt/te std QaPeul e"s Co st aceelsa "a with this < ►gtae and the tarel wed l or fur ltoocode= by to• reseed]. b the taut rite r.7 "rdtter th`he tutu or at it. ption old flat - ba"{e, the "[alt at then t ►grar• reeks oiled .,pat 4t Lot w (10) deri "eta" "tic• to the ►.sort lay mq tau P.forthe Guel�a.U�ill eetorho rgalred to isr" tt�•s" blaodelupu rte .ls "all, but alall be Use to is'" •tcb Permits la the offer o! later ee ]west twit "nee teased Net sorted to eem11 with the term of this ataA[er and such ether term aid comialele Imposed by the CO"cil. t _ Day Ordieaa. tat. 191 peg.{ gel tense br.its !er toy .+ tl 1 of Collard- ft.., The Council busby does dot A. that the disposal a"Im. catloctiav at ta.s.. traab. rabbitb at other solid oast. is • aeovice to be ptrforaod L. the City is aeardassa with the prwisicat of OL. chapter. Its City say free time to rise issue perdts to thou parties searing the criteria a this Cbsptar 8.14 and such other standards as eq be utabllsbsd by regulation of the City Council regarding the cellutfen of rufote. nbbisb W ether false of solid vast* fro cesraeisl sad iadestriel establlsbsente. to long a •sp acb ►.rdt twalaa Is gone. aoi:utlet of uterial NwidW tar hand sr. be ode only in accordance with the total and eassitlea bweal. Iuc► Is" ad charges for sorb collectlaa. control end dOpe+ai service shalt be these oblcb the Caundl soy tam Mr to time hereafter approve by resolution, so "to" (ball engage In the haziness of ullactlog. reawlug at dl.l*alng of asp adat.. trW. rahbisb or utba solid turn within the City fro •n coomMLel a id.atrial establlahsent oar transport the use war asp public -"Into as right- af-agy. elates a "tell to de see has tires bees obtained fro the Council and such straw small's etch the ►rwisievs of this chapter ad aty utha regulations whit base bets adopted prise[ to thin chapter. g.n.vee vat.f.l eeu.rrl se. It Is oatwful W . ld4measer tar say Noce to collect es aaspur% ceasercial or Industrial of... within the City else sure Nraea is a prsnitrne as battle defined or is a.tptd as utlied Is do g. Co er D Of thin a "rise; and it is ovlwtl for an prate to Nrnir. ailw as art Leto any sgrasseOt atataawer for the collection Or au.prttfet of total* fro asp ceurcfal or lodeAtriel sstabliabaet tLtb asp Pete. she 1. at . Nrdttn to bads defined except as NraittW la sub. "Mae. A.'gOi4 or D of this awtla.. A. the collection and ccesysl of gran@ clippless and shrubbery by individuals delta baWes* a professional landscaper.. wte the collection is dltectly related to their worto shall be aeppt I ram ttorduo permit gstea. t. d pernitte. bell net be retul.W to collect baerdas et dangsress materials as part of its rwular tallecMon activity, tmid ed dry etetic,. acids. bLehuarda.o tlaseable. wslosbft utaiale. issectieides. ad sidles ubstaau &bait lot be d&N&Lted in collection containers. C. intwtla.* and cal vast (e defiled in California Basics and Safety Cute 21117.3. at amended face time to tie as .q successor: Parisi.. or Nwisioes twat*, •bell at be collected by a parnittee. Asposa products, Inch wastes Stall Stoves handle W dispose of sub utertals only in tte saovar IDwsvd by the County health officer as designated dayuq and is accordance with the California asalth W gaiety Code. D. the cellectia. ad co-s1 of recyclable untelal. J.aldly. bet dot IWtd tan. 91888, vw.ppa.. alone. end cardboard. that are awuatd either for real* of for W savot"ter. at .se Products stall be a.yt tree the refuse strait spur, seta non eetl.rdw 1. rs.g..rl ss It urraulu. curb as the breaUd. et golpauto or other -donee or veyrwttdte eireaatauu. *kw* in the Jdtrrat of W City Mannga er design.* the particulaz situation Jaaaitto. such "AIDS. the City Usages " design.. sr. Los" lilted a t"sws" basalt* to •ions. Peru," or corporations to perfoo any of the earwirns regulated by this chapter. *abject to such nusWrn fees. cbs,ts .d eodi Mona the aiectartsace. aq ...cast ad as tha parties iwelyd sr. Agree apes; srallied that such fees W charge, rsceiM free a paid to any prhat Pena-- as corporatists order this auction for asp paid aceWing fifteen (13) days' da.tio. stall be appawnd by the Council. c;�--;1/ Ovals.". No. 191 9ne1 9,18,070 ear' of C.t, A pnefttoo Shall got collect refuse "r rabbivb at • lecati lug thus fin hundred (100) frme a reoidntiaritea, botween the beer, of 6t00 pa. tad 6100 e.*, the following day. All otbev "fuse or robbi.b collective. s? a&- place at aoytime, Raises limited by the City Itanngw,. 9.14 wee n9 tt 1 set P.,d..... Sbell erwnies all rutov "1• Cara reed diligence to collecting ..fuse'- a to provost RPilling. Scattering at dropping nteu, reed .ball lwmeddately, at the time of xcsrreme. CIO" op toy S"b spillage. e.tt eye tan.. A. LataPtaelea ete to be approved by the City. A. ltteltatlse @bell be all " noaditios d "role heavy duty. -*Ally ca "tnct d read palatal, leak C.Lotd.t. wLtb flesh fitting lidat restew "toe food precestine ar dry Orb. food baedllng establllbmesn sow rnuived to bolo co "ter- falsot[d tod to hold thr opaa at leant eighty dnnse while bolog eded. C. ptrv/tte- -bell meintde all sm.ppnlet f -niched In good meaboalcal wad unitary eoedltia vgieb ,bell lotted, perledle ,IosNag to provide a" W*taln a high degree of sanitation. D 14Custaeles &ball be tavatau.ly Wabiaed 1• goad Ordwt _ tuplwtelp replaced if - slightly " desned aN 'hell Oi ct "Iwtaly refurbish 14 by grstttn a anw"ity dictum. or os directed by the City Larger or assignee. �'.IMI ♦wt �.rwt rot t. .1 t e tt , A. Receptacle' 'ball be k"t b anrloseru as approved by the City. t. ass-Ftseles .ball be Played 11 further than to fat It" the Curb Ina of a public attest. or It that, to so such curb, go farther than to fowl tree the paved portion of the public street[ to the ov.ot to' teceprocle is to be collected ftee a Public alltys the receptacle &ball be piece ritbl, to fast of the edge of the rlabt -st-ap of Said allay. C. Is so it shall wry receptacle be placed within the poll, right -d• wry, or M Platt that would [rate w hazards" sit"tiso as dossed by the City kuag,r or Soulless. R.t 6.110 rues. 11«.11. All refuse treated. Produced or "cSmelsted to Or about s toamettlal " ledustrial establishment in the City 'ball be raeoved flow the Pledua at lust mots Ruch weak. It shall be almefal reed a d,d,me&.or for the OR p-st /owwse Of sty of the ,bert- 9ucllb d prWeo, to fail " v pint to Prod, fur tee amt of rduu at lust se oft" owe prnerl6ed 1m this section 6.1!.110. Lath dry'. willados of this &Ratio* shell be treated and coutdol.d a • '-Paste and dlbtivat Offense. 6.Ie.1tn w -fu.w 2LU set. A. yerdttes ,ball diepsaa of e"1lected waste,, at paret,ai c azesn", at a City directed landfill " transfer station In a va,awr assistant"? to the City reed 1' accord..,, ti,b .11 state sow Ind Imes, reed rnotorious. Pdlne.cc IS. 29t h; • b Ltg.ue enM.l • i t y g et tL I. A. The "go"St Of oering apparel, bedd /., or other ofua fro. cOlodl- al no industrial utabl Obrata (as defined le deccian 3.17 017,W at other plate. .beta bitblf Iefactlaes or "Steels's died&"' have bast protect Abell be pettornad under the eaMrviaias red directive of the Cnep of ran Inaard(no 4ef,► Officer std "orb MISS. shall neither be placed in Mca"se" Der receptacles ear loft for rgntar collattloe ned pelot. I- elably f1ewWls or mPlad' m radio astled refuse .ball sot be Placed to le ne ataib. or receptacle. for regular aollectign sad dLepesal, bar -bell be vaunted ender the supan Islas of the City 'd /or the Aglocy providing flee pretectivn •.nice uithLe the City at the Sapless of tbS nearer pod&as..r of the utarial. C. baba at other gelid east• centric/.. voter er ether liquid, Shall be dcllaed bofura Wag placed in a container er recrntacb. Dstter rbtcb Le rabject to decopod tine shall be w[gped /s gapes let nthur utarial hofoye holy placed I. a centai.ar or racgtacle. D. defeat Seats, as burdr defined. Shall set be staged is caatalvsra of recptacle. tog Igalat collection std disposal. hat .ball be rsoared at the «.pug's opnas. It-4WA be evinfel red a edadsmcaer for aid paracs to violate a4 ""Lotma of we leatlo. 8.18.130. ■snob .....e.... vests nseaNngs Costa la a waste. er coohiuttaa of 'Soto, which because t. lto gueaity caaceetratice, or physical, ch..l Cot. ur Wectlns c►arecteristtce N either. A. causes or sihelficastlt contribute h an lacrosse In mrtaitty Of d& feet*asa In During. ierenrst%les or I cepecld&tl.. [nerHblo. ilium. g. Palo a sebstaotlal loosest 01 petutisl brad to lease health ar anlrenma[ vbd& twoperly toasted, steedo tlo.spe ted, 0y disposed of, AS othem.a u.4ed. ha[assrs to rgalred net to place ant betardea. uterlai In did costdser serviced by contractor. A rbe neat that a cd&tsser pieces acy hasadn. material A a cootala t sergie d by aoattectur, paredttd& will not be required to elNur collect the .asergal id& a enables or mparalo net the "Metal before pseceaat.. the early* eantai'r. Perelttee • /all Is the past Net It lnahagt'tly I.e. aid had&rdaun .Starlet funs cestner's coesduq 'ten aid .steriat to the cestaur apes discovery of Cold uturlat. ter.tttu Na II entity softeners of art basadad& wterW feud Ls aastat'ne by placir[ a t4 as sat& cestalans. P...lttu •ball beep a daily 14 rlth the address of eecb costa.Sr 'be" container Sea Set seavlc*d red Sill Prerldl a copy of said log to the city as a meNly basis. It bell be minfal red a ed m ededner for say parson to violate any prnisios of this lattice 8.18.140. gde.lge ae..e e., t .i 1 t It I. .0t.f.1 red .isdamaw tar aid person to hers, be, er dap rdau Lthis the City at any elm, Colors n paclat Poy./t for such berated. banal AT dm as pge b been I eased poreuut to lo[berity contacted by the Council. and /or the Agency Providing fire protection service wl Nln Nd City. �9 Ordleaic* Pe. 291 h {e 7 e n tPd tM t of Peer' ". tl 1• aUlwf.1 aid a ciW.am -ar for aay p[ooe to etere or Kcesla" aay sevoss. nbbi•b or ai.eel:asea -• IAtis is say sae "icar or at say 1KStlos other 'bs. ea bercia'bn. u[ !oT'b, or for act tenth at tiro other this ae lollmt •� �• .p.. Palau •bait act be aeeesl•t•d of "at ad as ea[wcelal arv ladutrial pt aalau far • pniW at im is sc.•s at ooa reek (mra dap). sups fa tb• use e! to bar, .. fold ptxuain. •o7 otber toad haWlin *at'b1"brvu rber* uni" ,bell be at least voice n.17 •area day" P. toy .a?sled eftti— to dr,eu d mot ver mek (•n a days) cawls[04 Other C. holiday "Coto areas ttWadaa" vblcb sddltl .alldayay reek to able► a to I n p P S -ncha• day I.uea• aDa dulu to fWthi• PrlaatelTvovb sale,• nub at r*bblsb vAiCl4- 0-40C �To pnidadfritbia chapter bell prow Lee tacit vehicle era titer tit tight cue.. The City Wvn*e or dulPao -bill xetatrt the Psraitce to r*amro 99" mice er rapaia the* v*Dlet.. that of It" ore flit of udvt Wan to .*cap. eW /ar Tef -s. to be bica.. droP?04 . ltl to ?�rl f t Tx ..r tttrJVJt{ t, to ...... hams. 0. Dana of 6,00 ►•a. .&A 6600 seer .bci1 lane s .du. track Polls' " aay City attest. P Prvo ?.face bane the Dear* -2 4600 ado aW 6600 p.0 • ►•(} Its.. • veta•* meek pxkd as aay Clay erne ter sow t ►u aaax- (1) bear vales City Wmts " dtelgv** !• •at/tl04 'bac bnak does er aaatpvay siat*. ,Id. gash trash of t p.rdte.e .ball at all t•0 a testified" it lveorseet time bow. to the eA ". xctlrteaciae e2 'bs tack. aid a* ids.oiticdtics tub track bell Wa bb.tatoPI ltD a it.. (3)epaesd at "Clear u auneaay• !ter artlneiAer cectifl04 y cb• C-litarcis nn* Row ■anbci .W .aem f TKku3-4• 41i Uat tvot" -aM ter rdan. vobbish sod /ar solid run Catlett cc ritbi- the City .hall ba Tsquir04s A, To be csPl*t*17 eaclea04 -tit • rllad, easeb totb. -c -Cowat Aft• muport/n Tdu.. [rub er raDbd► is of nsnQ the Ciay• Coalletciy aseloe04 rilb • so.abaoxb* -t ceret aaau the that Tatra, tt..b ar nbM.► a ►041 Doc b•raltt04 tool.ck. Visible strut car .ball day at the sa►auuulib stun.. :F4 11 or bKem d1l"itd elect the Ph t. dt: nac" ms' Se be eoarowd b r'beaClay Wee{ *Thu deal {sae .bill be 1.1-104 -Color' apps 7 .d. identified 07 track ae-esd• • coape4 lets, aW total "tepbom e. +era Tberc ttmhe aetl be "Pt eta. aid is god s Vsls at sit time. JALUC -- • d. hch et soy puaittei • traea• shall be eaecod e as ailable at las?Ktios at .be di•etetia- Of the Clay say Pilaf of eperatiat. y Ordinate. ■e. 291 peno a t. 1 deal to be tend a.nnalll by the CLt7 for each tuck caglyiq with Pawlatoss of this tlaptn ad placed ens trwck.l� a conspicuous place. e.t e.rm t ear. Such pedtus at eri.eds • lwd tdrphena arise. mci, Help he staff" for pr.eaal concert between 8100 ..e ." 0100 p.o an . r l .orkte9 dqn, .do' at all ether tied. with 6s w4 97pe Of edcW_4n for the pupas* of taking edorgas. Ipa. A' pea the pupeas of thin abenears all turituy vLtht. the City bewa4riea which quality ,. eer.relei on Ldutrlei usceblishrats .ball be considered to be vithlg a caa,mCle.ho .mire ors*. ■.1 s.lte ..weds ee.:. t far► pmittee coat Praetdo high puliq ur.tt, by 1.4 ens y stadads W opply coget.t. gediltid. Identifiable and .df.=W pmoesel ebO .ma the osidesto of faube Qaarg. to • ootteaus. Wpfd ad iwotlal ru11. L The City m. at its option, require fLOdt prlatiq al the pereittee • .dole. vbeno amine will ceen0 then to *uu onto or ..I% is cloen 11eddt7 to pcirate ►ropes". a. The p11dt0e "all be reqdrd to hire wplye*& without egad W.S. reitalna. color. "tiaul "Ill.. MI political ?fit Ili, ties. er all uan new -ed.lt factor. C. A" rplayas driving ptdttaa•s refuse tracks abeil at .11 [lase but 1s bin at her pe ..... to. • wei It W appropriate vehicle epuaten9 license issued by the State of California. b. The pd rtcei s eaplepeaa shall be required to vast ell" id table uttered .hen •paid to rei." caltedties aardca within the City. r.t1 +m e..�tr r t A parattt" sent file • latter with the till 144.911 at dads.*& notching the following fafers tlau 1. ter W dasoiptio of the ps*tttot f farsaawt buLm, address and address of local office of ate perdtca.t y. Trade a" fin uasl d. If • Joist v.nntc Or • Partaeaatip or lidtd Partoa'sbip. the cart of -11 p,ruer" " Corporation 114 be wars of the office's W their pmastage of Participation and their Putudenr .ddre.a"1 a, puts bdcatig that the Pumitte. has onagd for refuse disposal is en seen Nun the oar sap be lgelly "ceptd ad disposed u direct" by Clot G, bus idteatig that parnittea in "'1111" to re "en eifleteat r,fees that eenvieet D3/ ordte.vc. •e. 291 Palo 9 7, facts lodlutiap that trvcty red p.(poent ..•fore to sit applicable ""false. of thin ch.pt.r. d, fatitfactrrp wide., that peseta... has b... is .elatsece a a Bolt& ca.en f. in --*$a of lire (y) 7.... .ad paesasee eat Ins than flue (y) rem attvd spmtlng sep,rA.0 es . tolng concern In coo.cial refuse collective," disposal. 91 s..Ofactory acid... that mrsittai s depnl... a .club coec-te In eamusrelal /Iadaag(Rl role.. rolleca(oo and disposal d,r(ree free opn•t(eao of cegaralle site to that comtaglatd by this pare /tt.0 Details shall lotted, I ...h of other contra tat u.a .ad also of municipality. uatuse of Sams• pwidd. and the a.en of the cntact Genes at the a.ciciplly being served. 10. Call= that permdtte, to in tool standing in tae Stage of t Ida and to the case ag • Corposoclea orlasi.ad under tat lye of nay other state, aside.. net p..dtta in ,Scan," to due basis.*. in the state of C.1ifecal.. 11. ♦ detailed Insectary Of the pendttoe • ".,Pant •rellmble lac Catlectle. [roue ruum,"tul Rod lat.swai estcbli.bw to. t. d acitta ag.t. .t free the County of Su p.nardl•e, that pasafttu either bad as the County rill lease at • ofvle,e • Mss 'De Occult sac the tallectlon and disposal of slid net- -(thin the City 1(eito .ad shall be •ttacbed to aid totter. 13. Such attar part(nwt just. of lnfor.tlea a the City tiaa.ps ay r.tal... I- LM a o..o. . ter • ..i Or* ceu(drrattoa of lafessetlen c"ralead 1. RbwGw.tj,,W is Et" ad [ollo-!ng • p.bllc basting Conducted by he City ou Cncil .µe at lust to 110) dye' prior .ritt4. Gott'. to the .ppl/caa, the City council any issue • p,,dt. tab permit iruted shall apply to correial ad lWeatri.l raft$. collation tar the city specified tbwGia. A fee for praoatat pwalt .pplitatloG shall be at by resolution of the City Council .lth status at an assent beefs. C. LGLt r, p..draa, Before treating a Fereir under the prwOloem of this chapter. the CORE it shell rate.., the 9-rdtta. as • ceditiee to the p-rdt to pest vltb the City Clock a scab head or Suaty bed in as Recent de : n .ralned by the Council ad f,ea[and by , Cetus..., rwety Rathw(.ad to do business to the state of Cal.Cormla. py.bla to the City of faecbo Cu'aecnga. Th. bond mbell be e.adlttoaad aWe tae felt cad fRltU.1 prlorenscs y the p.nl[tre o[ 411ptlaa ,der the applicable ptw(.iosa of this chaRse tad stall h, kyt in fall face• .ad effect by the paelttse thcangbout the life of the pd e(t ad .11 r-.usa,. tenant. �3t3 Miscue to. 291 era hp ID D. }neael�lr. rte \. A.N true ' 4 a Condition Of the City lowing a r rait. punittw .ball cagat mrde eft'be efeu a p,rLLtrl•m @bdtaimsudfy ad .... th• Clry, ate aff"I'lo' alerted officials- aylnyees aid asuta termites Roe dl claims, demands. uttul. of cause. of "clean of wary hied end description am say sad oil related •t[risgs' fees and '.art caste resulting directly or +� arid" oat of, or In urdeel sun vs( reoeseted vltb the the permit. leclmfap O,t set b[ vq cf I tutc., pormirtu, r odarfw at soar e([lcer. '"Florae or nest of t. jjehflle. peen , Tha Nrdttw ,hell coed. and heap is 'etc, dwiog the tan of the Permit "blic liability am bdliy lelary issuance to minus to detarmi.ed by the City faact, cow vocku" Ceop,wation four... cwadeg all aunlyw at the perdtw,. Carl.. of sub petidse, or certifft•tu "ideation sorb pelldesn 'boll be filed with the City Clark prier to the co.rec,esot cf utivitles eu4crid by the permit. Us City be used aslAd itional lon"d'! sell~ p•ii an! Most. $ball Policies *bell contain at • dmias • pelitlu. All each at*ery -day (90) dry quite to be given to the City btfoe, .edlfle"lon or Inductee of limits. The �-'% Most !d pvblto liability t*eri'nse for bad lly lsjril oed pecperry •son' abdl•be .object to rail« aced djsctror by the Caudl. T. Stall en .f e\ r,a..1 .n. t »eleHa , The pwmitte, it .tree to pwfv the terms of the permit In each a -near '. as to coyly with mil applicable Iota, and 'tire Ind 'm regelatieaa ".retain, to the collection, striate Bed twupertulas of solid vest.. The pe@dtt@e bell also county vftb all other ordinance, and rag.jujus of the City and oprlie•ble Iwo sod rtg\t*tLus of the Coury of pas Bernardino Aid Stars Of California. and ab•ll obtain aed lisp in lone all '•9mirad pudte did beat*..@ licensee tbrwgbwt the life of the permit end all removal, tberea[. ea soya r...l 1 1 A. fie 1, mist permit bead pattwnt to this Charter BaB @bell preside Iri the par.,ao of permit fear �w to City. ,ball contain dditieal Peailnioss yaed to by ead be wew City am pMtb, and shall constitute o written asTumest of u/e p[elu. t. 4dn�r ee w�.fw. er 1 , a to ..dwaut or usester of . permit pu@uat to this Agtsr .t is piµby the yunr.ttte.t viiewe� the pease ec,.. eeet et. CaiAct,. In the .eat at. ... tteuat �. u ttaa[se b aothrit*d oar the Cocci,, the aaip.. *hail ussea the liability Aid all other ehlip[lvas of the prrmi ins@. r °. dt' haj YAP` �. • _ 1 , ordiaaxt pa. 191 ?.As 11 C. ■..nr.eree. A psralt soy be tnaktd by the Co ... It is g, oral, thue le thus&' of Monthly of &Ay kind of After, It the operating Canny cet41 6p9rev4I thasefrl be@ heft ebtdad in orating Ira the .,meal. It It t@ deteeWad by the City Manager u designs, that pusitHe has not cvylid with the prorlolaa of this chapter. the permit, a" All ether applicdle ngnu:, ardle41ce.. Col.. a" ecgulatloas, the ctq U."', or dingoes @ball 41tify the perdttee to wriNag of aoecaglaease and @hall Mu coapliaate within thircy (10) Mar*. If na.. egl/naeA If set '*.ratted Githia the ,botgrourlbd tblrt7 (30) der period. the Caeacal. fell,alms , pehlle hearts& apft at lout to (10) day{ "I tun ...1, to tpv to boule. any tevminare the pent. L.1 e.fm ergb.. of 41@rf ei [etl.e , r yarsltts.. are ""'" the' pertteu of the City are pressstly bola[ panU rW ad ed eoaae Industrial r.fose collet else 'orrice*, Ad that these "faulty priding santee as& ►tae not" rights to ccatina ..id --mice fu • substantial p@rld Ap to ft-0 7urs) ,der tlo n"Wea, of sectl.a 427c at the California Laalth sad safety code. .rn es....�_i. ?s- A. fell,,], 0...,. A ch..n' fu the c.11"tice of refs'o 'bell be !saes" by the "rmittes .0 the nor at Mo.* is caateal of each cosrclsl er ld-uviat estdllab.t 'sh ... this& to refuse callsctloe seer's *. The a.eet of nod charge@ @bell be fled ad chanted fta tin d to if" by the perttee sft,r sm".1 by .,..Islas. of [be City Coucil. All revisions in ch -s, laid tl a pantto seat W sabmittd to the City Council fur ratter ad attic. lad at be sp,cmd by aesouHre of the City rouAril f *llmiag a public bearing ,pry at lout to (10) dqi 'title. AtMac to the ►eraltes. e.u.fee s......nrr. 79 s7 section, sob cti..a. v,st.eee. clause, of Hrass Of this cbapur It few ay -lure ►cld to be invaild or Cecra@Httia,.l, each detisi.a Ball act affect the Validity of the rewalolng per Hess. The City CeusHt of the City of 4atbo C.eauetga bftoby dealat" that It GwU here posed this clefts. and each :attics, .ehaectloe. eluse, W phrur eherwf lunspettive of the fact chat e07 en rr sere aA,tla*8 @dsectle.'. statutes, 9140141 er phrases be dutud {valid of ..*Dart tti.ut, bed Gould kern peed erg doped the sat evs, tb*s&b as& farts, :attic-@. ssbeectles,, assumes, class.., rr H -eau that user be held +nand bad be" .Kitt" thuefra. etma t' staff the effutivO data Of this Ordlesast, settle,, 1.08.110 And 1.08.110 of the 4acbe CcCesos&a Manlailat Co,., .ball be dacrd renal". ordloeece so. 191 f•t. 11 1=111 rr M Mayor .bolt else the Mia•acv .ad too City Clark Oell cab" the fam to be 'collated vithla tilt". (15) dor after its posted, at least work is nft a•tt, t..mr, a aa.wa•* of gagsal elrcal,tice published is eke City of CoUrle, Cetiford&. apt cirvt.tal it the City of A acbe Gcc•.q.. Calltar Lo. fint). AfAD/m. and ADCfTeb Ott a de, of a. ay. ATStt toss, U /OT, Jd /t•y riot, ttyor ATM?, &wetly A. Aothdac. CIO Clark I, 1Cn3WAt ADTRCeT, CM MM d the City of Rambo Cae•ao.a.. Gtitania. do herby certify that Ott forgets, cedlastce ace iotrd"00 at resalar matte, at the Coa"lt of na City of Rambo Grange bald " to 11b do of Nay, be/, and was fias /y paeed at a result, metied of the City Caamll of the City of taade Gwrga held ,a the a do of a. Lt". tY ",td chit • do at •. It- •1 twtho Gw "ga, Gtitm via. b•wry A. "O.I.t. City nark rD1315-- AFFIDAVIT Of PYMICATWW 'ATE OS C• "UFORMA �a )UkYOSSANBERNARDIMO Maurine D. Paean ,do hereby cartifythatI a the Lepl AdvcrUZj c iat a TETE DAILY REPORT, a daily Iwepaper of gentral dreuintiaa Dubllatrd in the at of Ontario( raky and State aforesaid bad that the atiadrd advertlamrat Notice of Public Hearing _ City of Rancho puC]IsW in said newspaper r, r : i uwlt: May i• 1996 i certi4- under i °f penury that the foret;oia8 V true and row, \�14tiu� -.:�� Dated at Onto. a, CoMords this lit day of May 19 06 �I ORDINANCE NO. a g o AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 5 OF THE RANCHO CUCA24ONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 5.12 ENTITLED "REGULATION OF ENTERTAINMENT." THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWSt SECTION 1: Title 5 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new Chapter 5.12 to read, in words and figures, as follows: IfttEter 5 12 Z3 "Regulation of Entertainment "Sections: 5.12.010 5.12.020 5.12.030 5.12.040 5.12 050 5 12.060 5.12.070 5.12.080 5.12.090 5.12.100 5.12.110 5.12.120 5.12.130 5.12.140 5.12.150 5.12.160 Permit required. Entertainment defined. Exclusions. Application for permit. Investigation and hearing. Notice of hearing. Action of hearing. Denial of application. Conditions imposed on permit. Suspension or revocation of permit. Fees. Time for filing application. Security guard required at dances. Chapter to govern. Prohibition and penalties. Civil remedies available. -5.12.010 Permit required. No person or business entity shall operate, conduct, or manage any place or promises open to the pu511c where food or beverages are sold, offered for sale, or given away, and where any form of entertainment, as defined herein, is provided or furnished without first obtaining a permit so to do as hereinafter -1- a3 7 ORDINANCE NO. page 2- provided for in this chapter. "15.12.020 Entertainment defined. Entertainment means every form of live entertainment, music, solo band or orchestra, act, play, burlesque show, fashion show, review, pantomine, scone, Gong or dance, act or song, and dance act, or any other act or performance participated in by one or more persons for the purpose of holding the attention of, gaining the attention and interest of, divert- ing or amusing guests or patrons "15.12 030 E;Wdsions. The provisions of this y chapter shall not be deemed to require a permit for the followings "(1) For the use of a radio or other nlecrrr n�,-,t playback device in any establishment, except when utilized by an announcer or 'disc jockey' who at any time provides any form of vocal entertainment, including the announcing of song titles or artists' names in conjunction therewith. "(2) For any entertainment provided for members and their guests at a private club where admission is not open to the publics "(3) For entertainment conducted in connection with a regularly established motion picture theatre, recreation park, circus, or fairgrounds "(d) For entertainment conducted by or sponsored by any bona fide club, society or association, organized -2- DL3 8 ORDINANCE NO. Page 3. -- or incorporated for benevolent, charitable, dramatic or literary purposes having an established membership, and which holds meetings at regular intervals of not less than once per three month period, when proceeds, if any, arising from such entertainment are used for the purpose of such club, society or association; "(5) For entertainment provided solelv by a piano player or harpist playing music for the amusement of guests or patrons of an establishment; �y� �s- "(6) For entertainment conducted solely on or at any preirtee or location which is owned or operated by, or leased by, to or from the United States, State of California, County of san Bornarcino, or any agency or subdivision thereof. "5.12.040 Application for permit. Applicants for entertainment permits shall file a written, signed and verified application with the city manager, or his designee showing: "(1) The name and permanent address of applicant; "(2) The name, proposed and current, if any, business address of the applicant. If the applicant is a corporation, the name shall be exactly as oat forth in its articles of incorporation and the applicant shall show the name and residence address of each of the officers, directors, and each stockholder owning not less than ORDINANCE NO. Page 4 .- twenty -five percent of the stock of the corporation. If the applicant is a partnership, the application shall show the names and residence addresses of each of the members, including limited partners; "(3) A detailed description of the proposed entertainment, including type of entertainment, number of persuns engaged in the entertainment, and any further information about the entertainment or entertainers, as the city manager may deem necessary; �i1�/ 'aa � "(4) T datc, hours and location where the enter- tainment is proposed to be conducted, and the admission fee, if any, to be charged; "(S) The name or names of the person or persons responsible for the management or supervision of appli- cant's business and of any entertainment; "(6) A statement of the nature and character of applicant's business, if any, to be carried on in conjunc- tion with such entertainment, including whether or not alcohol will be served as part of such business; "(7) Whether or not the applicant or any person or persons responsible for the management or supervision of applicant's business have been, within the previous ten years, convicted of a crime, the nature of such offense, and the sentence received therefcr including conditions of parole or probation, if any. _ -4 �)y0 ORDINANCE NO. Page 5 •- "(0) Whether or not applicant has ever had any permit or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or pro ision of entertainment revoked, including the date thereof and name of the revoking agency; "(9) Such other reasonable information as the city manager, or designee, may deem necessary. "5.12.050 Investigation and hearing. After the appli- cation for an entertainment permit has been filed, the city manager shall cause an investigation to be made of such application, and after such investigation has been completed he shall cause the application to be set for hearing before the Planning Commission and shall notify the applicant of the date of such hearing. "5.12.060 Notice of hearing. After the city manager has set the application for hearing, he stall cause notice of the hearing to be given to all property owners within three hundred feet of the proposed or actual location of the applicant's business. For the purposes of this section, notice to property owners shall be sufficient if given to those property owners who appear as such on the last equalized assessment roll. Additionallv, the city manager shall cause a public notice to be posted at the location where the business or entertainment is to be conducted. All notices provided for in this -5- ORDINANCE NO. Page 6 section shall be in the form and manner as proscribed by the city manager. The applicant shall bear all costs and expenses in mailing, printing, and posting such notices and shall pay such costs to the city prior to the time set for public hearing on the pending application. Failure to pay such costs by the applicant shall be grounds to deny his application. "5.12.070 Action at hearing. At the time and place set for public hearing as to any application, and as may be continued from day to day, the Planning Commission _ shall hear and determine all the facts and evidence relevant to the applicant and supervisory employees, as well as the entertainment proposed, including, the nature and location of the proposed entertainment. "5.12.080 Denial of application. At the conclusion of the hearing before the Planning Commission. the Planning Commission shall grant, conditionally grant, or deny the application, which decision shall be final unless appealed in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.02.0808. of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Such decision shall be set forth in a Resolution which shall be adopted within thirty (30) days after such decision is rendered. The Planning Commission may deny said application if it shall find and determine any of the following: "(1) The conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would be contrary to the N, public health, safety, morals or welfare; or -6 �,/1 " YC> ORDINANCE NO. Page 7. "(2) The premises or ortablishment is likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner; or "(3) The applicant or any other person associated with him as principal or partner, or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has been convicted in any court Of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the Presentation, exhibition or performance of any obscene show of any kind, or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude, or has had any approval, permit or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; or "(4) That granting the application would create a public nuisance; or "(5) That the normal opera ion of the premises would interfere with the peace and quiet of any surround- ing residential neighborhood; or "(6) The applicant has made any false, mis- leading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. "5.12.090 Conditions imposed on permit. After the public hearing as to any application, the Planning Cosissien in granting any permit may also impose such reasonable condi- tions as to the use or extent of such permit as it deems appropriate. D q3 -7- ORDINANCE NO. Page 8 .. "5.12.100 Suspension or revocation of peLnit. After notice and hearing, the Planning Comm;isrion may suspend or revoke any permit granted pursua.lt to thia chapter if said Commission finds and determines t:nt any permitted, his agent or employee, or any person connected or associated with the permittee as partner, director, officer, general manager, or other person who is exercising managerial authority of, or on behalf of,the permittee or any entertainer acting under the authority of such permit: c_ "(1) ie any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of a material fact in the application for permit, or any report or record required to be filed pursuant to this chapter; or "(2) Violated any provision of this chapter, or of any statute, ordinance, or condition relating to his permitted activity; or "(3) Is convicted of a felony, or of any crime r involving moral turpitude; or 0(4) Violated any rules, regulaticas or condi- tions adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council relating to the permittee's business or permit; or 4 "(5) Conducted a permitted business in a manner r ° contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public; or ��7 ORDINANCE NO. Page 9 "(6) Deaonstrated that he /she is unfit to be trusted with the privileges granted by such a permit. "The decision of the Planning Comniesion shall be set forth in a Resolution which shall be adopted within thirty (30) days of the date of such decision and shall be final unless appealed in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.02.0805. of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. "5.12.110 Fees. The fee for an entertainment permit shall be sevcnty -five dollars, payable ann»ally on or before January let of each and every year. Such permit shall be in addition to any business license fee as may be required by tWbusiness license law of the city. How- inv ever, for the year 1986, the fee for an entertainment permit shall be the sum of forty dollars payable upon submission of an application. "5.12.120 Time for fil.ng application. All persons who will be presently required to file for and obtain an entertainment permit by reason of the provisions of this chapter shall have to and including November 1, 1986 within which to file their applications for an entertainment permit with the city manager. "5.12.130 Security guard required at dances. All persons conducting a public dance or any entertainment where dancing by patrons or customers is permitted, shall have in attendance at the premises for the purpose of supervising the dancing and the conduct of all patrons and customers, a duly U-ensed and uniformed -9- ' / ORDINA 1( S NO. Page 10 security guard at all times such dancing is permitted or allowed. However, the provisions of this section shall apply only to those establishments or premises where a dance floor or dance area in excess of one hundred fifty square feet is available or designated for dancing by customers or patrons. -5.12,140 Chapter to govern. All provisions of this title which are inconsistent with or contrary to the provisions of this chapter are hereby repealed to the extent such provisions are inconsistent with or contrary to the provisions of this chapter. •5 12 150 Prohibition and penalties. (1) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corpora- tion to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this chapter. Any Person, fi.m, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this chapter or failing to comply ..ith any of its require- ments snall be deemed guilty of an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable as follows: "(a) A fine not exceeding one Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for a first violation: "(b) A fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for a second violation of the same ordinance within one years •(o) A fine not exceeding Pive Hundred Dollars {, ($500.00) for each additional violation of the same ordinance . x., within one year: a�i6 -10- V ORDINANCE NO. Page 11. "Each such person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which env viola- tion of any of the provisions of this chapter is :ommitted, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefore as provided in this chapter. "The provisions of this Chapter shall not be construed as permitting conduct not proscribed herein and shall not affect the enforceability of any other applicable provi- sions of law. "5.14.160 Civil remedies available. A violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisance." SECTION 4: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this chapter be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this chapter shall remain in full force and effect. -11- �iq7 0 ORDINANCE NO. Page 12'• SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, XID ADOPTED this day of , 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut a et, C ty C er I, BEVERLY A. AUTBELET, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance wis introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hold on the _ day of , 1981, and wds finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ +ay of 1986. Executed this day of 198G, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A Aut a et, C ty F er - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATEt May 21,1986 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: S6 201 FEES The City Council on Junj 21, 1978, adopted Ordinance No. 30 establishing temporury school facilities fees based on the provisions of SB 201. Viese fees have been to date collected by the school districts individually. However, each school distrlb'has now decided to charge mitigation fees as a substitute for SB201 fees on the basis of the recent ' -gal decision to the Candid case in Scat Diego with respect to such mitigation fees. As o • -suit, no "201" fees are being collected except for those remaining projec., which have standing school letters issued prior to the advent of th, Candid casa Therefore, SB201 fees at the present time have become moot. Since each school district U collecting -ts own mitigation fees, and since the present SB201 fees have been rendered moot, the City Attorney has advised that Ordinance No 30 be amended so that the now extraneous 201" fees are deleted to avoid confusion by those who have to pay the present school fees. Each school superintendent has reviewed the Ordinance change and concurs with its appropriateness. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an amendment to r manta o. elating the requirement f:r the collection of SB 201 fees. Rr\pectfu ly {ubmitted, Joc , r Director of Community Development JL:jk al/,f ORDINANCE $0. 308 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIQi 8 OF ITS ORDINANCE $0. 30, AS 891E10FORZ AMENDED, PERTAINING TO THE FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES The Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows fiZOM y 1N Section 8 of Ordinance No. 30 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby is :mended to read as follows: * SECTION RN Amount of Fees seal td se of Far meet. Until further smandeeat of this Section B. no fees or deduction of land in lie.. of fees shall be required for all projects submitted after the effective date of this Ordinance No. 30B --rauent to this Ordinance No. 30 as sanded." SECTION 2, The Mayor aball sign this Ordinauce and the City Clerk shall cause the sue to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in lba Daily Repart, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of . 1986. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21. 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager W� ��L! FROM: Mark R. Lorimer, Administrative Analvat �1 &44— SUBJECT: AUrQVING TRW CORPORATION AMD BYLAW DPIUMfRT6 FOR 101- 2110FIT FOUNDATION The process of creating the Rancho Cucamonga CaasUnity Foundation, the City's Ron - Profit Corporation, is progressing on schedule. Attached for your reference are the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Articles of Incorporation and Foundation Bylaws. At this point, these two documents aced Council approval prior to the City's consultant completing the next step in the prxeas. The attached documents are basic non- profit corporate articles and bylaws. The bylaws identify the Foundation Board of Directors as consisting of five member7_w6e nominated by oacb of the City Council members to serve for terms which coincide with the terms of each City Council member. The Board of Directors @ball be elected by a tbree- fifths (3/5) vote of the full City Council. The bylaws also create a chairperson. vice chairperson and secretary - treasurer for the Foundation. In addition to approving the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. the City Council should consider nominations to the Board of Directors within the out mouth. The out step in the proreas will be to nominate and select the Board of Directors, thereby initiating the foundation. "or purposes of submitting a formal application to the State and Federal Government for consideration of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation, staff has prepared a budget for fiscal year 1986 -87. These figures reflect a couservativa estimate of revenue and expenditures for the foundation during its first year. Neither the City Council nor the Foundation Board of Directors is obligated to these projections. RECOMMENDATION It to recommended that the City Council approve the attached Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and further begin the process of selecting the Foundation Board of Directors. Should you wish any additional information regarding the gaucho Cucamonga Community Foundation, please do not hesitate to contact me. MRL /dja Attached 6MO•CA COMMOIITT ET 1935 -67 EODOET fund Raising Activities $2.000.00 Corporate Contributions $3.000.00 Individual Contributions 0 500.00 Public Agency Contributions S 500.00 TOM REVENUES 66,000.00 Travel and Meetings Office Supplies Prosm tions and Printing Postage Contract Services TOTAL EEPMDITURSS NOW 61.300.00 6 300.00 625000.00 6 500.00 $5,300.00 1 .. . "I Zi. p, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION W THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION I The name of this corporation is: THE RANCHO CUCAMONW, COMMUNITY FOUNDATION II Tais ^ =poration is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Lav for Via- public and charitable plrposes. This corporation shall never operate for the primary purpose of carrying on a trade or business for profit. III The public and charitable purposes for which this corporation is organized are to lessen the burdens of government and to promote and support the cultural, recreational and human services needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Iv This corporation is not organized, nor shall it be operated, for Pecuniary gain or profit, and does not contemplato the distribu- tion of gains, profits or dividends to its members or to any private shareholder or individual. The property, assets, pro- fits, and net income of this corporation are irrevocably -1- as3 dedicated to the public and charitable pur03es Got forth in Article I1I, and no part of the profits of rat income of this - corporation shall ever inure to the benefit of any private share- holder or individual except that this provision shall not be construed so as to prevent the payment to directors, officers, or employees of reasonable compensation for services actually rendered to this corporation. ,1 No substantial part of the activities of this corporation shall consist of the carrying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempsing to influence legislation, nor shall this corporation participate or intervene in any polit cal campaign (including publishing or '?s distribution of statements) on behalf of any candidate for public office. Notwithstanding any other provision of these articles, the corporation shill not carry on any other activities not permitted to be carried on (a) by a corporation exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1956 (or the corresponding provision of any future United States Internal Revenue Law) or (b) by a corpora- tion contributions to which are deductible under section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (or the corres- ponding provision of any future United States Internal Revenue Law). VI The name of the initial agont of this corporation for service of process is 1901 E. Lambert Rd., Suite 102 Le Habra, CA 90631 -2- VII The number of directors, the manner in which they shall be chosen.. and removed from office, Choir qualifications, powers, duties, compensation and tenure of office, the manner c£ filling vacancies on the Board, and the manner of calling and holding meetings of directors, shall be as stated in the Bylaws. No member of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council shall be eligible to serve as a director of this corporation. VIII (1) This corporation shall have no members other than •:ha porsons constituting its Board of Directors. The persona consti- tuting its Hoard of DI ,!Dictors shall, for the purpose of any >;y. statutory provision or rv..e of law relating to nonprofit corpera- tions otherwise, be taken to be the members of such corporation and exercise all the rights and powers of members thereof. (2) The Board of Directors shall have the powers (a) to modify any restriction or condition on the distri- bution of funds for any specified charitable purposes or to spocified organizations, if in their sole judgment (without the approval of any trustee, custodian, or agent), such restriction or condition becomes, in effect, unnecessary, incapablo of ful- fillment, or inconsistent with the charitable needs of the city of Rancho Cucamonga; (b) to replace any participating trustee, custodian, or agent for breach of fiduciary duty under the laws of the Stcte of Cali:ornia; and -3- wi (c) to replace any participating trustee, custodian, or agent for failure to produce a reasonable (as determined by the Board.. of Directors) return of net income (or appreciation when not inconsistent with this community trust's need for current income) with due regard to safety of principal, over a reasonable period of time (as determined by the board of directors). (3) In determining whether there is a reasonable return of net income with respect to the exercise of the power described in subparagraph (c) of Paragraph (2) of this Article, (a) there shall be excluded from such determination ouch assets as are hold for the active conduct of this community trust's exempt activities 1 and (b) such determination shall be made separately with re- spect to each restricted fund and shall be made in the aggregate with respect to the unrestricted funds of this community trust. A "restricted fund" means a fund, any incoms of which has boon designated by the donor of the gift or bequest to which such income is attributable as being available only for the use i or benefit of a named charitable organization or agency or for i the use or benefit of a particular class of charitable organiza- tions or agencies, the members of which are readily ascertainable and are less than five in number. (4) If it appears that there may be grounds for exercising the power described in subparagraphs (b) or (c) of Paragraph (2) of this Article with respect to any fund, the Hoard of Directors shall notify the participating trustee, custodian, or -4- asp a: n agont involved and provide a reasonable opportunity for explana- tion and /or correction. Before exercising the power granted to the board of Directors under subparagraphs (b) or (c) of Para- graph (2) of this Article, the Board of Directors may seek advice of legal counsel as to whether a breach or failure has been committed under the lave of the State of California. The Board of Directors shall exercise a power described in this Art' 'a only upon the vote of a majority of the members of the Board of Directors. (5) Upon the exercise of the power under subparagraph: (b) or (c) or paragraph (2) of this Article to replace any par- ticipating trustee, cuodian, or agent, the Board of Directors shall have the power to select a successor trustee, custodian, or agent to whose custody the fund or funds held by the former trustee, custodian, or agent shall be transferred. IX The directors shall not be personally liable for the debts, liabilities, or obligations of this corporation. X Each member of the Board of Directors shall havo one vote. There shall be no proxy voting permitted for the transaction of any of the business of this corporation. XI upon dissolution of this corporation, not assets other than trust Lunde shall be distributed to one or more nonprofit corporations organized and operated for the benefit of the City of Rancho -5- Ds 7 M r Cucamonga, such corporation or corporations to be selected by the City Council. Such nonprofit corporation or corporations must bw- qualified for federal income tax exemption under Section 5.- ;c)(3) of the United States Internal Rsvanua CM, of 1956, and be organized and operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes, or for a combination of said purposes. In the alternative, upon dissolution of the corpora- tion, not assets other than trust funds shall be distributed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In no event shall any assets be distributed to any member, director, or officer of this corporation. XII ira_ The Articles of Incorporation of this corporation shall not be amended without the vote of a majority of the total voting membership of the Hoard of Directors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, for the purpose of forming thin nonprofit corporation under the laws of the State of California, I, the undersigned, constituting the incorporator of this corporation, have executed these Articles of Incorporation this day of , 1986. -6- C J15 JOHN W. FRANCIS Incorporator �1 ii BYLAWS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDLTION ARTICLE I Name The name of this corporation shall be The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. ARTICLE II Principal office The principal office of this corporation for transaction of business is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino, California, at 9320 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. The Board of Directors has full power and authority to change the principal office of this corporation from one location to another in the pity of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ARTICLE III Purpose The purposes of The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation are to lessen the burdens of government and to promote and support the cultural, recreational and human services needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ARTICLE IV Membership This corporation shall have no members other than the persons constituting its Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall, under any statute or rule of law, be the members of this corporation and shall have all the rights and powers members would otherwise have. ARTICLE V Board of Directors Section 1. Number of Directors. The Board of Directors shall consist- o! f v (5) vot nq s. Seection 2. Powers of Directness. Subject to the provision of the Cdllftrnia WOnprofrt— Corr.,rat on Law and any limitations in the Articles of Incorporation and these Bylaws, the business and affairs of this corporation shall be managed, and all corporate powers shall be exe cised by or under the direction of the Board of Directors. -1- WN The Board of Directors may delegate the performance of any duties or the exercise of any powers to auch officers or agents as may from time to time by resolution be designated. Section 3. Selection and Term of Office. The Board of Directors sha11 We compr�ed five (5) membera, with one (1) nominated by each of the City Council members to serve for terms which coincide with the terms of each City Council member. The Directors shall be elected by a three- fifths (3/5) vote of the full City Council. This section is not subject to em.indment, change or alteration in any of its clauoea or provisions without the consant of the .rancho Cucamonga City Council. Section 6. Vacancies. w vacancy in any Director position because of removal, death, taslgnation, expiration of term or otherwise, shall be filled by a three - fifths (3/5) vote of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council. Any person selected to fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors shall hold office for the unexpired term of his or bar predecessor in office, subject to the power of removal contained herein. Section 5. Voting. Each<m_ember of the Br trd of Directors shall ays—e one vote. There 6 i1 be no proxy voting permitted for the -s transaction of any of the business of this corporation. Section 6. Annual Meeting. There shall be an annual meeting of the Board of Directors on the third Monday in January each year. Section 7. Westin a. Meetings of the Board of Directors for any purpose or purposes shall be called at any time by the chair- person. The chairperson shall be required to call a meeting upon the joint request of any member of the Board. All meetings of the Board of Directors shall be governed by Robert's Rules of order, including such revisions thereof as may from time to time be published, except insofar as such rules are inconsistent with these Bylaws, with the Articles of Incorporation, or with applicable law. Section a. Place of Meetings. Hastings of the Board of D ri actors small a old at any place within this State which has been designated from time to time by resolution of the Board or by written consent of all members of the board. In the absence of such designation, meetings shall be held at the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. Section 9. Notice of Meetings. (a) Written notice of every regular meeting shall be given to each Director at least seven (7) days before each meeting. Notice may be delivered personally or by mail to the lase known address of the addresses and, if mailed, is complete upon mailing. Written notice of any meeting shall also be given �c M pursuant to this subsection to any person who requests such notice in writing. (b) An agenda listing the matters to be considered at each meeting shall be given to each Director, and to any person so requesting, at least seven (7) flays before the meeting. (c) Notwithstanding anything in the section to the contrary, the chairperson may call an emergency meeting of the Board without giving the normal notice if such a meeting is necessary to discuss any unforeseen emergency condition. An emargency condi- tion for the purpose of this subsection is any condition that, if not addressed by the Board promptly, may result in a detriment tc this corporation or to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Notice of any emergency meeting may be delivered personally, telephone or mailed, and shall be received at least twenty -four (24) hours before the time of such meeting. Section 10. _open Meetings. All mseti•igs cf the Board shall be open and public, and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting of the Board, provided, however, that the Board may hold closed sessions during any meeting to consider those matters that may lawfully be consids"ed in such sessions under Chapter 9 of v Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, commencing with Section 54950. Section 11. Qunrum. A majority of the total number of voting D— r�rs shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at every meeting. Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the Directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be regarded as the act of the Board of Diractors. Section 12. Removal of Directors. Directors of this corpor- poration may be remOVeT-at any t me vfthout cause by the vote of three (3) Directors, subject to the api.•oval by a three - fifths (3/5) vote of the City council. This section is not subject to amendment, change or alteration in any of its clauses or provi- sions without the consent of the Rancho Cucamonga city council. Section 13. Compensation. The Directors of the corporation shall be allowed and paid their actual and necessary expenses incurred in attending the meetings of the Board and such other amounts as may be fixed from time to time by the vote of a majority of the Board. ARTICLE VI Officers Section 1. Officers. The officers of this corporation shall be a chairperson, v %e chairperson, and secretary - treasurer. -3- .D(a Section 2. Election. The Board of Directors shall elect all oft care of t s corporation for terms of one year, or until their successors are elected and qualified. The annual election shall be held on the third Monday in Jat,uary. All officers shall be drawn from the Board membership. Section ]. Chairperson. Subject to the control of the Board of D ractorn, eth chaff erson shall preside at all meetings of the Board, and shall have such other powers and duties as may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors. The chairperson shall have a vote on all matters. Section 4. Vice Chairperson. In tha absence or disability of the chairperson, the v ce cbairperson shall perform all the duties of the chairperson. The vice chairperson a�••i have such other powers and perform such ocher duties as may e prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors. Section S. Secretr. Treasurer. The secretary- treasurer shall ash —the chairperson a preparation of the agendas for the meetings, shall keep a full and complete record of the pro- ceedings of all meetings of the Board of Directors, shall keep the soal of this corporaloon and affix the same to such papers y and instruments as may to required in the regular course of business, shall provide such notices as may be necessary and proper, shall supervise the keeping of the books of this corpora- tion and shall discharge such other duties as pertain to the office or as prescribed by the Board of Directors. The secretary- treasurer shall be the chief financial officer of this corporation and, if so required by the Board of Directors, shall give a bond for the faithful discharge of his or her duties in such sum and with such surety as the Board of Directors shall doom appropriate. The secretary- treasurer shall submit an annual report to the Board on or about the first Monday in October of each year. In case of the absence or disability of the sec- retary- treasurer, or his or her refusal or neglect to act, such notices may be provided by the chairperson, or by the chairperson or by any parson thereunto authorized by the chairperson or by the vice chairperson, or by the Board of Directors. ARTICLE VII Defense. and Indemnif.cation This corporation shall defend any Director who is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceding, other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that such Director is or was an agent of this corporation, and will indemnify any such Director against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and any other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such proceeding if such Director acted in good faith and in a manner auch Director reasonably -4- Q( a believed to be in the beat interest Of this corporation and, in the case of a criminal proceeding, it such Director had not reasonaL•lo cause to believe the conduct was unlawful. ARTICLE VIII Conflict of Interest No member of the Board of Directors shall be financially i:iterestad in any contract or other transaction entered into by the Board of Directors, and any contract or transaction entered into in violation of this is void. No Director may utilize information obtained by reason of Board mambmership for personal gain., and Board of Directors nay recover any such gain realized. ARTICLE IX Amendment of Bylaws These Bylaws may be amended at any regular meeting of the Board of Directors by a majority vote of the total voting membership of the Board of Directors, 17,evidlnq that the amendment has been '--�- submitted in writing at the previous regular meeting. L �' a CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 21, 1986 T0: City Cou cll and City Munager FROM: JI t, Adminlstrative Services Director SUB.'E( FY -87 Budget Workshops The finalization of the preliminary FY 86 -87 budget Is scheduled for hay 23, 1986. If all goes as planned, the preliminary budget document will be available late afternoon an May 230 1986. The latest the document would bea tillable Is Monday, May 26, 1986, To facilitate an effective and timely review of the budget, allowing for final adoption on June 18, 1986, Staff is recamiending the following schedule: 1. Workshops: May 28, 1986 6 -9 p.m. June 5, 1986 6 -9 p.m. 2. Advertisement for putlic hearing for June 18, 1986 regarding proposed City, Redevelopment and Revenue Sharing budget (we must advertise 10 days prior to the hearing, therefore, ads would have to appear in the June 6, 7, or 8th papers). 3. If there are no changes to the budget as a result of the hearing on June 18, 1986, all paperwork necessary to adopt the budget will be available. If there are any changes then the documents would be adopted July 2, 1986, retroactively to July 1, 1986. The setting of workshoi dates will be addressed as part of the City Manager's Staff Reports on the May 21, 1986 Council Agenda. If you have any questions, please contact Inc, JM:dh Q6 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 21, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Cultural Task Force, Donald Hardy, Chairman SUBJECT: COMNITTRR REPORT In February, 19861 the City Council appointed a twenty - member Cultural Task Force to identify the primary cultural needs of car coma pity. The Committee's work involved not only the identification of these needs, but also their prioritisation. The priority list of needs represents both local and regional activities. As the City Council begins avalusting the list, further study may be required in order to dateradne which activities are local and which are regional in scope. This determination will bwvo a significant impact on the financial feasibility r- .•jor cultural activities planned for the future. It is also significant to oor. that a number of cultural facilities of various types already "tat within the region. Care should be taken to avoid duplication of those facilities. The Task Force supports the concept of establishing a non- profit foundation to encourage donations for cultural programs and facilities. This foundation will Permit specific donations for library, cultural center or park davdlopaeat programs. It is our understanding that the adoption of by -lave and the appointment of board members by the City Council will be occurring soon. When appointed, the new board members will have an opportunity to review in greater detail the retaaaeadation• of this Task Force. cJ (0 �5_ The five Boat significant cultural needs identified by the Task Force are on follows 1. Librarw racilieiw" - It is clearly evident that library facilities in Rancho Cucamaga are inadequate for both current and future populations. The Task Force is aware that the City staff is presently analysing library r" services and exploring options for improving service to the public. The imprmetcut of existing library services i• a high pticrlty. It is the Task Force recommndation that an .dditfe d branch library be located in Rancho Cucamega City li c. That location is bettor suited for a library than is the site adjacent to the Civic Center in the opinion of the Task Force. The funding for ecastruction of this library/nulti -ose facility to be through the non- profit foundation. It is also recd nded that the City Council seek additional funding through possible federal /state grants or program available for public library capital isprovemuts. The existing library should be retained to serve the western portion of the City. The future library should be a "multi - dimensional /educational center' which will have available not only books and reference naterials, but also art exchange progress and exhibit areas as wall as avlti -media room and lecture facilities capable of housing children's theatre and perforadcg arts rehearsal and workshops to provide a variety of cultural opoortunitim for oor citizens. A facility of this type was recently constructed in the City of San Bernardino. In addition to the structural costs, there will be significant casts for books, periodicals and reference materials for the nev facility. It it further suggested that because of the unique features desired, only experienced architectural firm be employed to design the library when it is constructed. 2. Theatre Tor The Performing Arts - While the need for a theatre complex is supported by the Task Force, funding is dependent upon community support of the ono- profit foosdatiov icb is being created. It is proposed that the �s 2.6 acre @L-e adjacent to the proposed Public Safety -Civic Center complex be tentatively reserved for thin facility pending further study of the optimum location for a performicg arts center. The primry use of the facility will be for theatre productions, concerto, and symphony recitals. It is further recommended that at the appropriate tim, thorough studies be conducted to determine the specific type of theatre which is desired and the "market" area for the facility. Particular care must be taken to ensure that the facility will be supported adequately and that it will not become a financial liability to the City or to a noo-profit corporctioo. The task force raeommends that the City council evaluate the feasibility of leasing either the land or the land and building to the private sector. The private sector my bn able to adainister the entertaiument couples more efficiently than the public sector. Revenues from this lease arrangement way be returned to the non- profit corporation to fund other cultural activities and programs. In addition to the 2.6 -acre site adjacent to the Public Safety -Civic Center facility, the Task Force recomaeuds that three other potential locations La stadied. They are as foliwsi a, a +.rke [�•• -^-g Ct____�._Fa*t - This 99 -acre proposed park alto ban sufficient space for a library as vell as a perforaing arts theater. gwevar, traffic circulation problems ns vall as other planning regVlaents should be evaluated in order to be certain that the uses are compatible with adjacent resident al property and with other park activities. b, bandJyj =,. to Pro eo Red Za+{ea p9iRR linter - Since the Regional Center construction is planned for the near future, the City Council should contact the shopping center partnership to determine whether a donation of land for a theatre is a reasonable expectation. If the land is not donated, the acreage cost ny be prohibitive. The shopping center developer, Ernest Raba, has already agreed to provide a 3,500 square 'not multi- purpose community room for use by the City. "$d C. Lad domed by chaffxz Calla•• — the college at one ties expressed an interest in donating lard for the future development of a tbeatre or cultural center this option should be fully explored by the City. 3. Ire la ,jAlie Places - the task pores recommends that the City Council request that staff explore program to encourage the permanent installation t of art in public places. Excellent program exist in many communities. In lieu of addirional few for am construction, it is recommended that the �t City consider adopt!og a policy to prcvids landscapiagt beautification fee, s or other incentives toAY lepers who voluntarily install permmat arty J objects for public vier. Staff my bove further recomwadations regarding the implementation of tLis program. 4. fgglmia W Eebibit cellazi e• - Thu Rex Vigoall Xnaeus/Callery is presently operating at Chaffey College. It is recommended that the City of Rancho Cucamonga join with other cities to encourage cc%maoity support of this most worthwhile regional program. S. A—Mysl - Space for preservation of documents and records of historical significance is included in the newly planned Public Safety -Civic Center facility. 01114 6. ifeaeare. Da+aleauamt - The development of tcoaoaic resources to support cultural activities is of paramount importance. Among the resources which should be fully evaluated are the followings a. Donations to the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Foundation. b. Federal and State Grants, if available. C. Use of Redevelopment Agency I= Increment, when available. d. Donation of Services- Supplies or other materials. 3p 's a. Contributions from the City's General Fund. There is a definite need for erpandod cultural activities in our eonavaity. It is significant to note, however, that coav_obeasive amd feensal technical stadies aboald prmasde may specific dwisica gads by t:. City Cemmeil. Studies should include marketability of the site as veil as its compatibility with surrounding properties. The County o: San Bernardino Area Coma:asian is presently evaluating potential rite@ for cultural facilities. The Task Pores reeoaso„ds that the 2.6 -acre site adjacent to the proposed Public Safety -Civic Center Facility be made available as a potential site. This location offers ample parking, easy access and it will fit in with the impressive development which is already occurring in the area. ■ The Cultural Task Force is available to assist the City Council further if that is your desire. Farther assistance mq inclade additional research, recommendations or other work as directed by the City Council. Fortunately. there are a number of volunteer organisations such as the Fax Aigoall Museum, Friends of the Library, performing Arta of gaucho Cucamonga, and the County Arta Commission which are working to expand cultural activities in both the region and the City. Me commend Ones groups and we urge the City Council to cautious encouraging c sumaity support of these worthwhile organisations. ka - e;17/ it t It St �e VaLLL"l LM-4 JAMES E RAR£y vowm'.d a riom,xv may 20, 1986 Mr. Richard M. Dahl, May Pro Tem City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Suite C Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91 30 Subjects Tentative Maps 13057 and 13058 Project III and Iv ar the Groves Neighborhq /in victo.to .a,} Dear Hr. Dahl; It is hereby agreed that the following items are to be incorporated as requtrements at tha above mentioned Projects' 1. Each driveway will receive special treatment in order to enhance the appearance of the street scene. Such treatment may include a band of brick or special concrete or a border treatment in like materials. 2. A minimum of two ` gallon street trees per lot that may be clustered at randum providing that each lot receives atleast one etreet tree 3. 1 will work with the city staft to develops a program for maintenance of front yard landscaping if a how- owner should d.tault on their maintenance obligation. The proposal would be to provide in the CC&R's a pre- vision where by if the homeowner does not maintain his fron• yard landscaping, the city will ba able to \ enter upon the lot and maintain it and charge the cost back to the homeowner in their respective tax bills. f Note, Each front yard will be landscaped by the builder and provide 60 day maintenance following escrow closing. r &WNdocidh4rmS ft&g,,dtoC.LOmrtO%Cc*L9f730 VIQ96022M It- Ale -�.. i ✓� �VIi.i.TA AI I.10i�' �Caa� ?i� Mr. Richard M. Dahl page two It is further agreed that The William Lyon Company will include a church site of a minimum of S acres fronting on the south side of Highland Avenue at a location to he deeided in the future, however somewhere between Milliken Avenue and Jay Crock Channel. Mr Dahl, it is my understanding that the above mentioned projects will move forwar<ae approved by the Planning Commission. �zy. We ur ey t and RegSo�al Manager R ' i ` I .% `YII.LIA1rI LYCY,� �an�i y . JAMES F. BAUY Wxw rcwmoeuwwvoa Nay 20, 1986 Mr Richard M Dahl, May Pro Tem City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Ease Line Road Suit. C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Tentative Maps 13057 and 13058 Project III and IV at the Groves Neighb5_%k6od in Victoria Dear Mr. Dahl; It is hereby agreed that the following items are to be incorporated as requirements at the above mentioned Projects: 1. Each driveway will receive special treatment to order to enhance the appearance of the street scene. Such treatment may include a band of prick or special concrete or a border treatment in like materials. 2. A minimum of two 15 gallon street trees per lot that may be clustered at randue, providing that each lot receives stleast one street tree. 3. I will work with the city ata[f to d, e o program for meintenanca of front yard lands, if a hone- • owner should default on their mainte •,e obligation. The proposal would be to provide in the CUR's a pro. +: vision where by if the homeowner does not maintain his front yard landscaping, the city will be able to 1 enter upon the lot and maintain it and charge the cost back to the homeowner in their respective tax bills. Nota: Each front yard will be landscaped by the builder and provide 60 day maiutenance following escrow closing SMArc:bc�dAbwm S:SaB.RanchoQmfflongm Coff9t770 I21q90T244 919'e WlLLIAM IN N'�oii� Mr. Richard H Dahl page two It is further agreed that The William Lyon Company will Include a church site of a minimum of 5 acres fronting on the south side of highland A enue It a location to be decided In the future. Sowcver somewhere between Milliken A�enuo and Day Creek Channel. Hr Dahl. it is my understanding that the above mentioned projects will move forwamd-As approved by the Planning Commission. �p W ur oy t and Reglo al Henager i r Y !. R J. F n 7y NO e L SECTION 1 - AUTHORITY FOR REPORT i This report for the 1986 -1987 Fiscal Year update Is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in `+ compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 225W of the Streets and HlghwaY Code, Provisions for this annual assessment are included In !� Chaw.r 3 rf the Landscaping and Lighting Act w 1972. The purpose of this report Is to sat forth findings and the assessment !, analysis for the annual levy of assessments for Park and Recreation Im- provement District No. 85 -PD, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, utilizing uirect benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, and oper- ation of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. sy I + i ij SECTION 2 - FINDINGS - Section 22573, Landscaping and lighting Act of 19r.:, requires assess- ments to be levied according to bcneflt rather than awarding to assessed value. The section states: "The not amount to be assessed upon lands within a: ae "a::mant district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the not amount among all assessable lots or parcels In proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the Improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the Improvements Is contained In the Irnprove rent Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 8000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also pa�*Vides for the classification of variovs areas within, an assessment district Into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the Improvements, the various areas will receive differfig degrees of benefit from the improvements Benefiting areas consist of all territory receiving substantially the same degrae of benefit from the Improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are con- sidered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Ar- ticle XIIIA. properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, coumbj, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval cf the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right -of -way, public utlilty trancmission right-of-way, common areas, and nonprofit organizations (I •., churches, clubs) are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon the underlying lot acreage. SECTION 3 - DISTRICT. ANALYSIS A Improvement District Boundary The Improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cuca- monga with the general exception of the Etiwanda area In the northeasterly section of the City. The Etiwanda area Is not In- cluded In the Improvement district because community park design and construction In that area is, In general, being fi-tanosd by de- velopment fees pursuant to the Quimby Act. The acsessment dis- trict boundary Is snown on the assessment diagram map (Exhibit A) All parcels of real property affected are moro Particularly de- scribed in maps prepared In accordance with Section 327 rf the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file In the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor In the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, S"Yoornardlno, California and which are hereby made a part her6LIF by reference B District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park improvement District No. 8S -PD C. Facilities The existing works of Improvement are generally described as follows: 1 The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading; planting; Irrigation; onsits roads; sidewalks; parking lots; lighting; restrooms; equestrian facilities; playground equipment; picnic facilities; athletic facllities; and walking, Jogging and equestrian trails. 2. Th.) construction of Red Hill Community Park Including, but not limited to, grading, planting, Irrigation, onsits roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizens facilities, playground equipment, picr facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, Jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street Improvements SECTION 4 - ESTIMATE OF COST The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward sur- pluses or recovering deficits In subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually Any surplus credited against assess- ments or any deficits shall be Included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. 1986 -1987 Fiscal year Estimated Costs and Budget Summary Deficit from 1985 -1986 Budget ($19,299.75) Contributions (Interest earned) Redemption Fund (Limited to Pay Bond Debt Service) 22,780.00 Special Reserve Fund (Limited to Pay Bond Debt Service) 44.613.50 Total Estimated Available'Funds $ 48,093.75 County Special Charges $ 200.00 Administration Charges 56,260,00 Consultants' Fees 25,000•OD Fiscal Agent Charges 1,500.00 First Debt Service Installment (1/2/87) 324,770.00 Second Debt Service Installment (7/2/87) 479 779.00 Total Estimated Costs $887,520.00 Balance to Assessment $839,426.25 T� SECTION 5 - METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 Indicates that lighting assess- ments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distrib- utes costs among all lots or parcels within the District In proportion to the estimated benefits received. A Definitions The District is divided Into three categories for the Purpose of de- termining the assessments as follows: Category A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. Category B - Includes ail parcels not defined In Category A or Category C. Category C - Includes exempt parcels Exempt parcels were dis- covered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that am listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting this search, several parcels were Included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, res- Idential or agriculture. These parcels were added back Into the roils and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula Is based on actual land use Information Assessor's computer files contained in the current San Bernardino and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meet - Ing the following conditions: Assessor's Number of Existing Res. Size Range Pared Slze Range Dwelling unite per Parcel 0 -4 Ltss than 1.5 acre and 1 or more dwelling units 5 1.51 acres to 3.5 acres and 2 or more dwelling units 6 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres and 4 or more dwelling units 7 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres and 8 or more dwelling units 8 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres and 15 or more dwelling units 9 25.01 acres and larger and 26 or more dwelling units 5 Category A is .based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing resldin° Val dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the Improvement district. Maintenance costs, how- ever, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticlpatad decrease in assessments due to new development. category B: All parcels not defined In Category A or Category C Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. all properties currently tax exempt; 3. all public ownerships; 3, railroad mainline rights -of -way; 4, major utility transmission rights- of-way; 5. mineral rights; 6, parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7, all normally assessable parcels with an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and S. nonprofit organizations (I.• , churches). C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assassment which will be Iavlod annually Is $33.50 per residential dwelling unit for those Paruls In Catego- ry A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwolling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $33.50 times the number of dwelling unite 6 Category 8: The assessment which may be levied annually for parcels within Category B shall be according to the following schedule: Assessor'n Assessment Size RanS! Definition per ParceM 0 - 4 less than 1.5 acres f 16.75 5 1.51 acres to 3.5 acres 50.25 6 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 117 25 7 7.01 &eras to 14 0 acres 234.50 8 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 469.00 9 25.01 acres and largsr 837.50 Category C: The assescment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. Same assessments may vary from the values given above by $.01 or s.02 elther way. The computer spreads the actual Balance to Asssssmsnt, carries the extra pennies left ovor from an even spread, and adds them one at a time to the assessment roll from the first parcel downward to make the total assessment spread ex- actly equal the Balance to Assessment. The Individual 1986 -1987 assessments by Assessor's parcel number (Exhib- it B) have bwn tabulated and are on file at City Hall with the City Clark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and are hereby made a part hereof by this reference. Dated /11A ✓/34 /!i6 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES n InNr 0 C I of Rancho Cucamonga S te of California Preliminary approval for annual levy Of assessment of the district and preliminary approval of the engineers report ware made an the _ day Of , 19_ CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters In the engineer's report were made on the day °f by 19_, by adoption Of Resolution No. the CI CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said assessment roll and engineer's report was flied In the Of- fices of the City. 1991neer and the City Clerk on the __ day of CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ' " "r T OF • PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 - PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) CRY OF RANCNO CUCAYONSA COUNTY OF SAN S[RNMDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA SCATS NN rtI TJ ..0 til K. Agi.4WAT °.. u. »,.., {w... nnnt .... Ys INDEX MAP �GL2 AAA Inn A .mw Pr u.. uvr ALn- Y.�r ..PUAM.PSA Pn .uuwA m. P .•"-.. err�..e n W s M YYYV. YW.. PYPyY.�OP.. {w• P...O.P W LLViPPA/Lf u.- iG1R3 {7 Yet I1 Y{YM PFl(AJ P..Y P .M tVPn� MtT Y.PA °'� Y..P.Y{.. A..«. AT �r 1Ti� ✓�M �, VIE SHEET < OF f SHUTS PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 - PD SEE SHEET 3 iI RE [[- BOOK 1077 HA EN_ _ t A m m 0 x N x m m M ZOOK OB '= r N r r (t� 6 i _ ` • -. __ I - L fCftE BI FEET ti,� SHEET S OF E SHEETS PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 - PD dc rwo - L 0 0 0 I x a I LL F W UJ S = W S 1 a _ � a I 202 z _ y� BASELINE RD co S — H W N �� — SEE SMEET4 e,we iew .w EC�LE IN lE[T