Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/07/16 - Agenda Packet4 ;re My or R NaID CXAML.<.GA crrY oamI;n, AGENDA Lions Park Community Canter 9161 Bane Line goad Ravebo Cucamonga, California All ir�e submitted for Ws City Comcil Attends meat hn in uziti.g. Ike d"JI107 for submitting these items is 500 p.an ou 00 Vadsesday, prior •s too eweliad. -lit City Cleat's Office recsL„es all seep ita►. _ 1. Pledge of Allegianee to Flag. 2. Boll Calls Nlkelo _ -, Buquet King Dahl _, and Aright t, � 1lBOfyCBlliis /Plgg�ajlj(I�E 1. Thursday. July 16, 1986 - 700 p.m. - PARK DEVILOPIIBBT COKKISS10N - Lione Park Community Center, 9161 Lane Line Road. 2. Vedoeadsy, July 23, 1906 - 7t00 P.M. - PLAdBIBC COMISSICP - Lions Park Cosmoaity Center, 9161 Base Line road. 3. Thursday. July 24. 1986 - 700 p.m. - ADVISORY COnRISSION - Lions Park Cotomoi Cj Center. 9161 Baia Line goad, t y .Y Yr $ City Jouucil Agenda July 16)- 1986 f. ca•.iz C���O:i no fellosiag Comment CaleaMar Ltd" are apected to be routine add neeeoatrovemial. 1647 will be aeteA upon by tko CeaetiS at "a time vitbent diseataion. 1• Register NO'S. /for86 /total eadro7i9 /86 6/26 /866 the' 1 saouut of 02.176,212.31. 2. Alcoholic levetago &pplieatioo So. Al, 66 -08 for Oa -3a1e 6 Beer t Vito, Craig 6 Laurie Blather, Joy & Mike McCormick, P(saa d Stuff, 9740 19th Street. 3. Receive Claia (CL 86 -03) $&*!not the City by Garrick S. pj Couch for patconal injuries on Campus Avenue. 4. Receive Clain (CL S6 -0f) &Smoot the City by Albert V. 13 Sell too I9 and 7 for personal injuries in the playground &tea of Lion. Park. 3. Receive Claim (CL 86 -35) against Via City by Sobbf Ray 15 J &ckada for persbaal injuries 00 Turner Avenue. 6. Approval of Release of Bonds sad Varied of Ceaplatious 19 pact 1Yg01 -1 - located ou the South ride of Samoa Vent of beryl - The Door Crack Coapsuy Accept: Maiutaoance Cuar.tatee Pond o 18.000.0v Release. Faithful Perforaatee Pond (Rt&J) 0180,000.00 Nouuaaatation Send 0 2.830.00 Tract 11797 - located Dorth of Pnar Line and Past of Archibald - Elite Development Co., Inc. Release$ Faithful Performeaca Pond (9traet) 1$162,000.00 , Reduces Cash Deposit for laithful Perfotaante (Store Drain) - Reduce faun 022,300 to 116,8000 releasing 03.700 •;•J5• to Slits Development ':t� • " ', !..- " C City Council Agenda -3- duly 16, 1986 r r RR$OLUTIOE NO. LS -20 24 ' A I•EBOLUTICA OF TUB CITY COUNCIL of TER CITY OF IANCEO CUCAMONCA. u`ALIPORNIA. ACCRYTIRC THE PUDLIC INFROPIN16n FOR TRACT NOS. 12801 -1 AND 11797 AND ADTEORIIING CRS ML1nG N A NOTICE Or CONPLITION FOR THE NOM 7. .Sppraval to reek bid proposals for the City -Ride 25 . Exorgency end Routine EgaiPaeut Paveamut Repair, , Shoulder Grading, &M Debris Ren val Annual Maintenance ,.oatroct. S. APVraval to atrk Lid propauls for the annual City 26 Ctrr„t 8w4epina Servicen Contract. , 9. Approval tni exacutiag of Protaeaionsl Servieee 27 ANreamuuts for projeat addni- tratiox, construction tiles ccd iospectier of the Naae Line 8ldevalk Project. The entimate of cocf is 11,990.00 to be • fuudcd from Daautification Funds. 10. Approval of Improvetant A.$reement and Impxoaa ►Oat 20 Security for Tract 12777 -2 located on ebe eautb ails of .. Due Lioa, be:wnen Turcee and Pim us Avenue&, submitted by M A 8 Reuidaatial Developmeat. , r ILMOLUTION 90, E6 -206 29 A MOLUTIOh OF T89 CITY CVINCIL OP THE CITI t, OF RANCHO CDC.SNf.ICA, CAL1fORILf. A'1PRtHDIO IMFRO9ENINT,AOMICCII. IMPAMMMIT SCMILIT1. ADD FINAL MAP Of YRACT NO. 12772"2 11. Approval of 2rofovsivacl Serviced A$reemvat for the �1 videnied of Beryl $tree. lion Lamu Avccur. to Mandarin Avenue for Wilson, Inn. - Bhceben and Asacclstae for au :4 asoant not.. to exceed 913;750.00 p' -ae 10I concio2encits and will bo funded by Sye.ev Develorment. 12. Approval of Pxotarviaa Cenieer L g reeun.. i_e the 32 •�1 + installation u: Ro2ber Crouivg Yadr ac tba " lu.eriectl ,a of Arebib4d Avenue and tho A.T. A B.Y. it ' Railroad crisain_� north of Bib Street, for Wilson, Inn, ' - M4 eban and Associateu for en aaeaar not tt "coed ' 16,000.00 plf•e 102 couticg,aaieo and will be funded by , 80 - 325. ., " ', !..- 0 e jE city council Agenda -4- July 16, 1206 ' i 13. Approval of agreement for the Installation of Public 33 Improvamauts and the Dedication of Roadway Rigbt -of -Pay between the City of Rancbo Cacenooga and Arebia and Batty Milaon, in conjunction with the proposed Archibald Avenue Railway Crossing Yidaaiog north of Base Line toad. RIBOLOTION N0. 85 -201 41 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITT COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMQCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ACKINNIMT FOR TNI INSTALLATION OF PUILIC IMPROVEMENTS AND THE DEDICATIO9 OR ROADWAY RICUY -O7 -WAY NtIUNEN Tit C21•T or RANCHO CUCAMa1CA AND AACHII D. AND BITYT JUN HIL8a1 ALONG THE WT SIDE OF AICIIIALD AVENUE NORTR OF ILSE LI319 ROAD 14. Approval of teal Propa-ty Improvement Contract and Lien 42 Agreement for CUP 65w3, located at 9900 Arrow Route, submitted by Iglasia Dal Masrrano. RESOLUTION 90. 86 -208 43 A UJOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAMOMCA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A HEAL PNOPETTT IIRROVARMT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGRHEMEIT r0R 14Lffi7A on NAZARHNO AND AUTROR7EING THI TUTOR AND CITr CLINE TO SrX THE SAME 15. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 45 Beau-! y for 7740 Bast Avacua, submitted by Wayland Gillespie ral:hful Patfordace Bond 99,500.00 Labor and Mn:aricl bond 44,750.00 •�: RESOLOrION N0. 86 -209 46 , A RZSUUTIC31 OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOICA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING r IMfROVIDLIST AOIZSKtNl AND INPROVIKENT SECORITT ?OR .740 EAST AVENUE 4 ti ... r•' 1 :.r y;tiY •yfy y� f j a if i E City Council Agenda -3- 16. Approval of Ahraenaut with the Central School District for The installation of public improvements and deOlcatton of rigbts -of -ways. The agreement will construct improvement at Cantral School in conjunction with the Archibald Avenue sidewalk and Beautification Pro; m t. 17. Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 8116 located on the south side of 9th Street, between Bares and Coast, aubadtted by Gilbert A. gadrigusa. Faithful Performance Dond $8,200.00 Labor and Material Bond $4.100.00 ABSOLUTION NO. 86 -210 A RESOLOTI0l 0: THE CITr COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVIKENT EXTENSION ACRREMENT AND xMPROFRMRNT SECURITY FOR PM 8116 18. Approval and execution of Professional Serv.cas Agreements for SOLIB and Materials testing for the Improvement of Leman Avenue from Berwas to Archibald cad the Improvement of Archibald from Lcax, to Banyan based 012 a proposal from CW. Inc. for an &noun- of $4,338 to bs funded from the System Fund. 19. Approval 0, a Pipeline License, between the soutba -a Pacific Trausportaticn Company and the City, in connection with Tract 12330 located on the vast side of Hellmeus south of Base Line, REDU.UTION E0. 86 -21t A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL Or TLR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOOCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICL9e6 BE1vBEH TER CITY AND TUB SNU2BRRN PACIFIC TRAREPORTATION CONEANT Fag THE INSTAJIATTOS OF A BTORM DRAIN PIPS BENEATH TSB RAILROAD TRACRB 20. Approval and execution of contract documents for the Improvements of the Archibald Avenue Bidevelks. Thu contract was awarded to Hubbe Equipment and Coastruetino for the low bid of $199,717.30 on July 2, 1986. The project is to be funded from thw Beautification Fund and SB 323 Fonda. rme�lmameimr�o July 16, 1966 48 52 53 55 56 57 59 f i Y {f j City Council Agenda -6- July 16,119N ` 21. Approval of Historic Preasrvation Coaadssioo's 6U ' recommendation fcc City Historic Landmark designation to be placed on the Henry Albert Building, located at 7136 Amethyst Avenue. REAOLDf100 NO. K -212 61 A REOOLUTIOR OF TEE CITY COUNCIL CA TAB CITY OF RAN CEO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZIP,C ' IRE HENRY ALBERT BUILDINC, LOCATED AT 7136 AMETHYST STREET, AS A SIGNIFICANT L16TORIC FEATURE 01 TEE OITY OY RANCHO COCAMCNOA AND THEREFORE DBMICNATDM7 IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK 22. Approval to satharise and direct Community Services 62 ,y Director to distl`ibuta requests for proposals for Professional nrvivas to design a comprebeaniva trail i implementation plan for the City of Rancho Cue4moga. r 23. Approval of Resolution to destroy City records. 65 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -213 66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 781 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMA, CALIFORSTA, AOTEOR3ZIRG THE DESTRUCTION 07 CITY RECORDS AND DOCUi10TS ' NRICE ARE NO LODGER FEQOIRED AH PRGTlDED UNDER GOYERAMENT CODE SECTION 34090 24. Approval of Resolution establishing a fee of 025.00 for 68 amending tax statements on prepaid assessments. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -214 69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TR+ C(11 " OF RANCHO CUCAMWGk, CALIFORNIA, 9SUB1 'r( / A PEE OF ;23.00 FOR AM6.IDING TAX HTAVkMil FOR PREPAID ASSX83MMTO 25. Approval of Resolution establishing a fee of 07.50 each 70 ' for prepsyrnt - alculations on 1515 Bond Act Assaaaasut Districts. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -215 71 A RESOLUTION OF TER CITY COUNCIL OF TEX CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLIbBINNC t; A PER OF 07.50 PER CALCULATION FOR 1915 BOND ACT AOSRSSMOT DISTRICTS VJ1 ��r +J•1,f -'h� ����1'L`1 T::1yP •!M'` .1 �l' 1 ^I iS, � T`• � •��(f9', i F` 5� City Council rganda - ?- 26. Approval of Oisa9lutiou Of Tract 00. 1241.1 frcm Ltghtlug Malutenenca District No. 2 and refunds to property ovuere. 27. Eat PL4110 hearing for August 6, 1966 for Eav:roomantat Assaaae vat sad Development Arreement - Virginia Dare •• An agreca.uc by and betvusu the City of Rancho Cucamonga, C/A Ltd., and the rover rartuarobip regarding the development ol! the Virginia Dare Wised Project, in particular, sbarn6 packing. 1♦a. ���• lY9ni110. I. STATO11 REPORT Or POT1M;ML IOQATI01 OP 7L0(ID COETink B11>Zltcra I:■na fm TDB G77R ;t vre_n�I•�I[rt °Rang. 2. Z=rIAL CMS29. may .yolMKU - The Council viLl rWitrr specific locations for poteuti,Q land use amendments. Rr Lw schedule vill also be discussed. 1 3. CalOnre Ca 702 RQ.rCTI011 P Or'n1R 70D M•1aD DI DIINCTISI 101 TOS 1wy— CnCkNe2rA CMAUtTy YMMATZaL. (Continued from June 16, 1986 meeting) 4. 9,11g96)'iIpl OP PROPD$iD AOOIDA_701.10 Z NU=K -'1M YATS.DSl1YYIIlT. (Coutin -ed from July 2, 1986 watiog) [_ Ann QTEP noat.2^ .L..�e 1. fvVI1CzKM AO�I• RiS Mor 7D DEVQOP1pr CSR ladMU 86 -02 - CITP Or alJCRO 1•UAMMea - A Propodal to emend Se:tion 17.04.070 pertaining to Temporary Uasa of the Derelopaant Code al the City of Isacho .ucavuogs, Ordinance No. 211, to alloy off -site d"elopaent of t model homea. y ORDINANCE DO. 293 (second readiop) tM ORDINANCE OF THS CITY CODICIL OF IRS CITY OF RANCHO COCAMOSCA, CALIYOgfL, AMODINO TITLE 11 OF THE kANCHO CUCLXONCA MUNICIPAL ^.ODE TO REVISE SECTION 17.04.070 - TEMPORARY 0866 ° +W Je_y 16, 1986' °Ci: 72 73 82 87 68 sip City Council Agenda -8- July 16, 1986 2. APPEAL OP IIJQli1(i CUIMIRRPI]E )lICIBTOI gEYtIMQ 95 f.011DITiOrtf• OBE }EFMT7 b- 1�?R'_'A4i■8 1 rOIEI -■ VI a - A meting ball ie the Comes&] Industrial District (Hobart& 3) located at 8751 Industrial Lune - APE 209-031 -74. 3. adg %MN6lrtt AUiw nr AND .ea AT. MAN .vnnv... 118 86-02- - UWA1 I,." - A request to emend the Land Use Map of the Ceneral Plan from Low Medium Density lesidaatid. (4 -8 du /sc) to Dedgbborhood Commercial for 1 5 acres of land located at the eorthwest corner of Same Line mad BNvanda - APO 227- 111.10, 24, 25, and 26. (Continued from July 2, 1986 meting) RESOLUTION NO. f6 -201 134 A RESOLUTION OF TES CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF AAOCHO CUCJJWICA, CALIFOIXIA, DfNYINC GERARAL FLAL ANSIDMQT 10. 66 -02A, AMENDING TEE LAND USS ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO COCAMOICA ' CIMRAL PLAY IMP7IONHUM ASOKAIMdr ■D t77w1yR "��,-zUj dMO1DMamr 86 01 - IADVAITA■ _ A rtqueat to amnd the Etivanda Specific Plan Land 084 Map from "CS" ' (Community 0ervice) and "LM" (Low Madium Density Residential) to "MC" (Relgbborbood Commercial) for 9.4 acres of land located at the curtbseat corner of base Sine and Stiwanda - APR 227 - 111 -10, 24, 25, and 26. (Continued from July 2, 1986 venting) RESOLUTION E0. 86 -202 135 A R93MUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIICA. CALIFOIMU, DENY160 ' A7IVANDA SPECIFIC FLU AMENDMENT H0. 86 -01 REQUHST13G A CIU09 is THE 9TI9Il(DA SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATIINI FROM CDIOWNI77 SEAYICt :0 P&rJRDOKVOOD COVIEECIAi, FOR 9.4 ACRAS Oy LAND LOCATED 00 THE NORTHWEST COIONR OF RASE LINE ' LBO STIVANDA 4. APPEMAT, OP-U2 Orlae QWjXWjQ JI,ypDN IRA4PoRTIMED 136 AIMAKIRM - Ana" neat District C2 -1 inaucred land divisiooe tbat necessitated reapportionment of auaosmuts for fiscal year 1986/87. RESOLUTION 20. 86 -216 138 A RESOLUTION OF TPS CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO COCIMCACA. CALIy0pRU. CONFIRMING '" •C AMENDED A85ZEENSOTO III A SPECIAL ASSE89MENT ' DISTRICT"I P ems,. City Council Agenda -9- July 16, 1986 I. ■dN'16ryi6asm.oii7a•,i . 1. APPEAL IT? PLANNING C(j=L1M!jMjAjLU - IaMGIIIIWTu, 141 AYBj8gI617 AlD Dggp�,ppy(ys�LLN dS -22 - Qal1I1De Q[Wj - A request to apptal Plansira CCU+10nLOn &Orion ' durlog revies of a request to modify tLe approved building elevations for a 6 ,An wvi* theater of 25,188 squaw feet, within as ap ?roved sorter plan M:;inis Dar* C*atea) locotad on the nortbv*vt Career rt Foothill and Roves, to the General Cnr*reial (CC) District - APN 1077 - 194 -01 mad 03. ( Contiaued from the Juno 4. 1986 r*ting) ' 2. AMIALOFOF MANY= COIOQQeI�IB:M - MY {ItI� DdaR 142 }(.I* JOR OII I9f1RM BICa Al!7LiCAMR. (Continued from Jun* it 18, 1986 Iwsting) I. NODIPIGi..,TA 20 11y,1y r (](A81Lr5'Y OIDAAmGR 156 - An Ordinance vbiub consolidates the duties and responsibility of the ZAvisory Cosudssion in Ordinances 87. 87 -A, and 87 -1. ORDINAIICI NO. 291 (first rsadlog) 157 t AN OIDIRAIICH Or TUN CIT.' COUNCIL Or IRS CITY of 9A11CR0 COCIKONOA, CALIrOOZA. CRIATIIC A0 ADTI800 CO:OISUSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO TS8 CITY COUNCIL A7D 1-LAI9INO CONNIIDION �. CISS�♦dsasm•N NSYri mVdq • 1. DISCUBBIOI 07 COIIM'YS ?thIOY1CI DR7Y71(A r1CSL27Y. 160 (Coutiouod from July 2, 1986 retiag) 2. Added Item: City Leases },82 "f ] Am1011�111t ;•• \j� I I ♦ 1 � �i uw iu A'� S�ny wu ii J•wi ..:� au F D {Ill{;'' J •Y, �• I ar ur .w.:1 v AF vo nN uo an waau aab iia. i i i 1 � r' oo yYSI oY ire .P.° IFni rria.•1'' 4f CP x ;�y s ".,6 `�I R 1 ' ^ ~ MT .2E ii•T i / V ,( r'•n N w ((.. •" 11 P ,'r J ♦' NN f. J♦ 5?� C �F=p �i1w «A ,t is °� i Nn u:• lltt YUVI i "• J) nT WEE If 1 » t( � r_ •� gf r rF � � '�� � 1 + ga GR C: € �5viri <,N•. •.♦•,� .z.IJ- ns iKz .N.I'° .N•♦F°r o ! '., g �• Y PR o n•. ti [a ii C TT y T ^'SJ IIA g� <I'Z' Tj my •auR zw T' � ri•ri, Tn nT y)iJN f1 11 TR 11 ! •IIwi,L )• ,•^i O i h Jr ).)• V'w O� Ir/n�� N IL • ! f� i ri^ ^h�'y•Pi J h•4. «Y lag �✓^ C �� P" 2 1 I nn n n, n I a r P � 6 x5 �T,' •Ry! r 1 as AI 00 P ',' ! I � � � MT MN MI M N I ♦ T I p• p Rp } np 111111,,, 11• s 1 1 �•��' I I DP ••� PC �C R» I♦��CIw• +P �NP �PC�pN �P�PR IM , �� 1 e YW VV V4 y4Cryry1 N NY[. ` T +' I I wM M +•N.Ai yw PV VY�Oa P1•A1I FO�OwJ ' (P Y,a I I II P, Mi.i� F I I r0 ON Na AVt1,Mn r°iFYr T"pU rP1�J,p P'♦J »� 1 I ; L •,^I \'a •' +� • • (( Orp • aOC/, r4p�MC PO -P nn00 r 1 f Y hi I i OV Oro P��nfV. (lYO ISrw'y,OY• VSry OYnOS�P S ^P OO A '• +, 1- I I 1� �, 1 • !�► III � :,.1 aiif.:'�a•�3H :-..i~;,.:'� .:nit' f"' —''_'• i -- Li — .I 1 .rv• *,•y ;r7r, . r !I I �I ■ =r i` r FI Y P .Ti Y I 1 i r Py P us ur s$o° wy� ui of ' i I ' I I 1 � I ,I I f 1 I ' 1 4 1 jj1 i ■ =r i` r FI Y P .Ti Y I 1 i r Py P us ur s$o° wy� ui of ' i I ' I I 1 5 . n P� P r Y f m TTw C� F r L T R t . T 9 N I ! O "10 � • KM Tw NT °S Iw • i DNfe MII16 i I MIN S w ND Aw Y (� P^ •k r s : DNT If 5t 1'1- �01TY.=tl I JJ T :$••Tt it � eI I T C ¢ I I I .}1� NM ♦1 P yy nJ .with .n�Ijr"a'�'i �irNFi3�� .s�^� Sy. s coat ( I w`�feJ. Yre �. ' I '- ��eC�i ;��l.r L r♦.i a iN nlnRr iEi I IQ *14 y T= a a nn s a A 1 i a o oeodou °o loapeo 00 o eod1jeo'o, lob I� E 3 .Ye�.44.� �.E �. �' rr pp lii:::YY �F ..1 «.�.003eo eosi��oa i� w��i ii LP - -�" �♦ ur ro Pr ew�+r x�i Pw uN ow ♦ ii°1•��io� 3Y 3 0 .;I f r I ♦ 11 N ysy � p . r P V ♦ Y..e PO � A � li '1 ^'F I I I I O ��COV e� MN�P\ Oa' yY I.n £QP P ♦ }iD w I p p 00 ti .10 lI,C.,I I I I I I O• .<��0�• � Pr , M ti_IISN• LS �ipM V 0Y9 �P.°18 N L I I I I ~ D i '•p, I i I I I I i I � I I r 1 x�4. C.Feia +:,Yi1P <;Y �'fi i'a G -••ins C'�,r'rz.i ; _�:L..�S,'N �;Y::f ?'Ei i 7 ! t a E ■ L: C, I A• I i «W N4 OV NIA ^fin "Nr�l I �' 'b I lil,x �` a on } n I Ici� YII 11I I • I I I M 11, T YI{�rarx Nrb y nii «oy TNN „r,w: MI�rwNt�[�waXl i CVyT OTn iln 0= steTMiw irn Y'1Y (1I LmWT XuT �i IQ fi��n N'•u.. „ A TyMTM �r �Ir„I"II"F�G �I' Ypy■I�n�CMMI�1.I.SII���YG w�a ,1 C• it -I }r•y N� ^ SS .wwy N`ni� 1 M „T TT I ]I yM T.,w n;el il'In [pl ^CN 141 x ii 1 F <rrT'T iT! `IIYI {I I11�� w.il'1T i3NTw;3n Nyi F C Iy T T S i I IN I r� y�w NY ” TS 'i'I MA In I} Il I�it ' n N IC NR 1'I II N I n i.0 i i s � A Y I is sil1ll D oPao".. u(I� ^OIOO pIOT1 o n0o a On00 oapo one .so ryyeyiSbgpPIllOOu�P1�Y ylQyy Se1'P yyeyw�VwYO it rr J IY�PJJ•.y(.I. �•r ~•IJ JyYVY WVyNN .JN Iy�NYLY.«» +M -IM Oa6TON�Vl.r OapJw�JM�VOaP -IY PJVNWOarYp.PJ r I ra u, I I �N .�♦ r r P jl N+O�NpY JJY} rsa,".�NUNYYU-b Mai MNrr 'YO UOp�N O YW.NpVgW T.Jr pYb dY J VMJ W.^.Iw NYOY P; I >pgnyWg YS y�.MNO DOMd�r{OJi�NO�MpIVwpOpSl iO r.Nn�Y i plot” r ' IM 1.Q « Y. 11I 1 r T 1 = y i 1 J 1 i n i n i � •11 t� 1 Y I 'L.. �I • I I I I W I I 'I ,� f'• J I e! P I'� LI i� p�V4 S >,, �r Lil,•• y L•, I I ImyJ.ewel I N I I I "dt >• S � r. I I I I I< �IiT 1 Y 1 I T NTTTTTTT � y 1 I I I I I I ! I I I ° t: I '°°•w�olCn� IS It I I (I 1 w 1 I , I I I ! PuM�lti t 11 I l u� � I s s• I 1p m _e r da'Mt.A �y W I I KILO qoa I• I• N w0 OO• I e 4 I I I I yy �'�af'S� '- {— r�-- -,�.}– ter,,,�,..} "�_':`}. 1"+_'_�.' - - -- - :;._^..';_ •'s( {rt�}S„+in,`�'j�n irn��•v;s::�, •�i.'A w4r•iin "�::Cp ". .w�,R?•`nlAlrn..i�., mm�n '�n�lnern. '"'�lw'F."�Y: Y}Tii+r • Ir Alrrw N y4•aaY Ywaar :ard - a'i i_CC 1" lnal.ry Ibl •r t.:a ..�✓ . a; t: r(Srr 110- r 4r1rM. QYSiilrYy I Dray CJi/.�p11 �r�• /•.ecl Ai:C alb. �� /alas C CM 11.: alar�aa ul UI16nrI / Yaws �..�� r•1 i KyYI(4 d MIIIC WOO Y�YwW 1 t /:A.t^. HaM� aac Jaa4 O 1' EnaJ . 4.ua brl.• Or. LA RAa Mr ICCJrU.I[Y, J a al.J t m ml d TA&,"CnOK* b IrC iab ' A nr.re.r... } Irr..N�-•- -. •• •- ry eno cq w iy CNa �� � ♦nl�r•s Wrr{ ).Mhwwa lwW Sfw_I�.Nllo^r JI•arlla to I Car lmr) a wmo.w WdYr.r a..)1- aawFrwlr+r rwm.r i iw.. n. rrs.�wMa.l.rlw�� la alw la+wr•44M rRNw. n.1'raNlanaW4 •' )wrap CJSN YI r raaaloaw N .Y Ealwrw Irr. nlrJywYM 7 II C .alaaa')G•r•a.rwYr ♦r1Ewr.awdrrJ rrb •rtMAvrJ araNwY!saenay I la Maw. aran'n M w •wwryr a valwan Y tr•Na Iboa awrnn .0 a.n N M wWaaa N r Y..r, e•/ I MM1a•.rG....Www svwawwbMalaM MrNM rw.raNM. A4N+4 Mww�a CsnMM 1 Il lTAri tv ..•,•ICl,ala Crwrr M I •.` r�r..r�..u.rrar.r�.w ar. w...+.r ^....r �..,rr.a...r :r:..... �.. yi.+wur.r .a..r.......r.r..rra.. r..........�.rr �.. w^.. Ia ArfIEANI , Ildl aIQ1 1 � AMr-ATM sr nunRw I / LL fiAl) d tawnaenA Gr'ry N�Itn Mru Nlw Ors 5 /:ar i t r . .... .+.r r�.+..•w+s rrrr ry..rrr...u..ra..`rrrrrr ..•r �.a r. r r.+..s ..r •..^..r r +wr.... r ..r rwr r w ar.. u rr Y.r� w 4 •�ti arrY 4•.1 M. •.a Y .�. �r r n• �• .t. YrY. Y4r . M .� J wrlr:� ^.rr.Jwrr�rpY r•�w�,.r.•ru �'w..��.•. 1:3 r^y a..,... r•rr r. yr .nr .ir•a YY �• 4 ^rr 4 .rrw � r• r ..w r r,M. �•s. y •M •r r a••� r .' ..- � . /u ..a. � +� •� rw y� W r ra yar^Vr. •�j.we �^ •�4 I .mow Irl r w ..r .•r.. •w w •r... a. •r w It Hrratn alU.rin h. f'r.Nn N llvti(p It tkw n.ial.) YYa .WAlii_ar.n �. I - - - - -- �.iw aiu! %. a..rro CuJJ.enp Ilil fills su aJrnarnarti I I �� ' ANN IPrIr aaYs i/Jr(Jra it Gncanlr Vr ONS ' ' 4r1rM. QYSiilrYy I /alas C UI16nrI / Y. �..�� yr, w Loewrca q }y0 f4 iE Sy-, ;< P � Z.K.: Mf /CN RReeO "NLuteO4 „ ,2a "X.7 oF444of rl' P*Tary u .. (Slea'LH : •N!td1u�NF{i 4a� -w -ay au(�; �� Soara; H•4tuM.Ru4u.414t. *YYa+,v /Ae ' Ens nullu�i'µQK /w'4M Dti` ;gk •: " hit5! ; bFFGCE Y � Darya_ , ig p KI 9TK c • Tt1P a; 1' r iRL�� �s cizoiS Y7>rl pima � s t%+ui¢ie• 919z�S- Foitt� woo De 9iTli kvu t. .,Kt(ritFR s� .' �Kf t , 11 ig p KI 9TK c • Tt1P a; 1' r iRL�� �s cizoiS Y7>rl pima � s t%+ui¢ie• 919z�S- Foitt� woo De 9iTli kvu t. .,Kt(ritFR s� .' �Kf i 0 i v 4 5 Attww r: 6 7 B 9 10 11 Claimant (fl�ti bia a 1ta IRLW WAW taLT f , CM OF r' o ADMINISTAATON JUN 27 1986 (ef9l�l�i+� A ON CLAIM AGAINST A GOV- RNME.NT ENTITY GARRICK S. COUCH. ) 12 Claimant., ) )CLAIM FOR Pp lSONAL 13 v ) IIfJURIES 7 14 CITY OF UPLANDI CITY OF RANCHO )(Govern&ent Code 5910 15 CUCAMONGAf COUNTY OF SAN BEIUNARDIH01) at seq.) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ) 16 DISTRICTI and, STATE OF CALIFORNIA -) METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF ) 17 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ) lB Respondents. ) 19 TO THE CITY C1ERK OF THE CITY Of' UPLAN01 CITY CLERK Of THE CITY 20 OF RANCEO CUCIMONGAI SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY'BOARD OF SUPERVISORSI 21 SAN BERHARDItO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICTI AND THE STATE BOARD 22 OF CONTROL: 23 I. 24 N �I YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that CaRRICK S. COUCH, claims 25 damages fr3m the aforementioned governmtntal entities in the 26 27 amount, aimputed as of the date of the presentation of•'thAs claim)` Of TWO f6,ndred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00). 7(? . 28 t N laaas��� 0 1 t1F1ZfZRT M71F" 2 • .IYIwM.MY OW1W !•• M'�, Mn. ~ Me.Y• 01111 6!•Y.f171 3 siwicy, nw •••n•s: 4 5 Attww r: 6 7 B 9 10 11 Claimant (fl�ti bia a 1ta IRLW WAW taLT f , CM OF r' o ADMINISTAATON JUN 27 1986 (ef9l�l�i+� A ON CLAIM AGAINST A GOV- RNME.NT ENTITY GARRICK S. COUCH. ) 12 Claimant., ) )CLAIM FOR Pp lSONAL 13 v ) IIfJURIES 7 14 CITY OF UPLANDI CITY OF RANCHO )(Govern&ent Code 5910 15 CUCAMONGAf COUNTY OF SAN BEIUNARDIH01) at seq.) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ) 16 DISTRICTI and, STATE OF CALIFORNIA -) METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF ) 17 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ) lB Respondents. ) 19 TO THE CITY C1ERK OF THE CITY Of' UPLAN01 CITY CLERK Of THE CITY 20 OF RANCEO CUCIMONGAI SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY'BOARD OF SUPERVISORSI 21 SAN BERHARDItO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICTI AND THE STATE BOARD 22 OF CONTROL: 23 I. 24 N �I YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that CaRRICK S. COUCH, claims 25 damages fr3m the aforementioned governmtntal entities in the 26 27 amount, aimputed as of the date of the presentation of•'thAs claim)` Of TWO f6,ndred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00). 7(? . 28 t N laaas��� 0 i rn 4 5 6 7 8 I 9I 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 :4 i 25 t 26 27 CL 28 � ZI. •` The address of the claimant Is 7770,Busna ?Vista-Drive,1 City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California 91730. III. This claim is based on personal injuries sustained -by claimant Carrick S. Couch on or about March 23, 1986 on land /pre_ mines approximately 1350 Feet north of the north curb line of 16th Street and approximately 4000 feet seat of the east curb line of Campus Avenue in can Bernardino County, under the follow- 1,� ing circumstances. IV. On or about March 23, 1986, the claimant was operating his Suzuki 4- Wheelor on the promises at the location described in Paragraph III above when unbeknownst to claimant, the dirt ro,,,d- way abruptly, and without prior warning, ended, resulting in claimant driving over the edge of the cliff /embankmant, and fall- ing approximately 30 fast below in and onto an abandoned rock crushing device. The dirt roadway upon which claimant was driv- ing w.fa in the direction of a gradual incline, and created the ePPearence that the dirt roadway was a Y con- lnLous surfaced shruc- t ture. P- 4 The above- described roadway and surrounding aroa was nadequateay and negligently designed, maintained, managed, con- ` roll d, supervised and cperated to that the dirt roadway ab- uptly ended with an uncovered, unmarked and abandauad rock l Cushing device below which bath governmental entity knew .4' Is exercise of reasonable care should he vs known >• c'!n'L� ;f . �on��i' tutea•eitir; fit, 1 dangerous condition and unreasonable risk of harm of which clai 4• 2 mant vas at all times herein mentioned unaware. Each and every', • 3 governmental entity named heroin negli,•enLly failed to take-'s' -, 4 to oithef make the condition safe or warn claimant of the dange.' 5 rous condition, all of which caused claimant to fall into the z 6 open and abandoned rock crushing device. ' 7 V. 8 Garrick S. Couch sufforeti major injuries, including se- 9 vere head lacerationw, multiple contusions to his body, com- 10 pressed vertebra and general trauma to the body. The claimant 11 continues to to under the care of a physician with the filial de- 12 gree of his injury j ry ye t. to be determined. 13 VI. 14 The claimant's injuries in whole or in part were 15 brought about by Lhe negligence by the CITY OF UPLAND; CITY OF_ * 16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CJUHTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY la .I 17 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT; and, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - METROPOLITAN s 18 WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, by failing to adequately 'I 19 design, mark, control, mtintain or supervise the above - mentioned «t 20 dirt roadway and surrounding area conatitu[ing a dangerous condi- 21 Lion of public property as defined in the Government Code of the 22 State of California. On said date, the combined negligence of 23 CITY OF UPLAND] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA) COUNTY OF SAN y 24 BERNARDINO; SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT} and, - '., 25 S1 :E OF CALIFORNIA - ,METROPOLITAM WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN _ 4 • 26 CALIFORNIA, proximately and /or legally caused claimant's above - S �t 27 mentioned injuries. `' y.r .F ELF .,now RT, 28 .y •rt,` 11 { V 'j�,{' 4S . {DIY, , r't, ` � •f• , 'j�� 2. �T V11. a. 2 The damages claimed by the rlaimant is 3 :ter the medical ' expanses, loss of'sarnings, loss of eacnirg capacity, pain and , 4 suffering of Garvick S. Couch. + 5 VIII. 6 The namoe of the public em to eels ' y P Y ) cao,linq the flange- -.• 7 roue condition of public property to exist are not :mown to clai- ` 8 e manta at this time. g a IX. 10 The damages claimed are as outlined above in the amount 11 stated. 12 X. '+` 13 All notices or other communications with regard to chic 14 claim should be sent to the claimant's -t the Law Offices of 15 Herbert Hafir, 269 West Bonita Avenue, Claremont, California • 16 91711. 17 DATED: JUNE 26, 1996 18 ' 19 LAW OFFICES OF HERBERT HAPIF 20 BY: SS :p 21 OLD S. BOTT'O,yLS�� 22 o- 23 20, { ){' 25 If 26 $ t•r 27 ,bk• ; v ., xftp � + �:"♦'1 a%�' {TF.i�'�Y" - �4�s�t,. 4'`7�• - , :r' :d :' 1. 'jk r r,. ` ri= �•k,`•".'f..^.Yr :..r � V 'S� t 1. �' \4 �' _ <�" h�r� . Wt .'e �:q"� >..7�,;i`.�'���ii'"�. `a I, . i' ,. r �!. •fir .,', i PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (1013a,' 2015.5 C.C.p,) \ w. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; ` 3 ' I an a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen 4 years and not a party to the within entftled ' action; my .asiness address is; ! 5 269 West Bonita Avenue, Claremont, California 91711 , 6 On JUNE 26, 1986. I served the within, CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES BI P, on the partiew In said action, by placing a true er.closed in t copy thereof 9 a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, ' in the United States mail at Claremont, California addressed 10 followat as 11 Clerk of the CITY OF UPLAND 460 N. Euclid Avenre • 12 Upland, CA 91786 13 Clerk of the CITY OF F;NCR0 CUCAMONGA � 9320 Base Line Road 14 Alta Loma, CA 91701 15 COUNTY OF SAN BERIJARDINO OF SUPERVI:iORS 16 I 175 W. Fifth Street San Bernardino, CA , ' 37 SAN BERNARDINO O)UHTY '- 18 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 825 E. Third StreeL 19 San Bernardino, CA 20 STATE BOARD OF CONTROL - BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 926 "J" Street, #300 y' Al Sacramento, CA 95814 22 Executed on JUNE 26, 1986, at Claremont, Ctlifornia. ` 23 I declare, under penalty of { L !s true and correct, LIn jury t� the foregoing, 25 a A. rno _ 28 s ADL V `���RI' 1'�ti lryrye�1'Yily _ %T.P. NY,R \.44�{V Mil .. - Assess ,♦ Y •'OHN5:0704.O1:CLALl FOR DANACE "OR�INIOHY , ` SeLI'll TOl DACIAQ OR IIJUHT � Ig a C' r ,� I. Clain for death, injury to parson, or to personal proper �TM_ R{�NCH()fiibpligh than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, See, 911,2), 2. Claim for damages to rest property most be filed lair b,�iailas, the occurreuce (Gov. Code, See. 911.2), ��' To: CITY or RA *M P tbtrt J.,. �,,,, 1�000UNMck an 9990 .cm+,Y Q 1kith �o..y.(A IZn q P7 •99/2 — Ntaa of Clsimset(PaWr ) Address - s Zip Thooe Age Address to which MQ did damage or Injury occurt OOKI did damage or injury occur? L,nni-E nrk q:lto P's NOW and under what circumstances did dmm ge or injury oernrT�Lb 4_rh ,ten r —tn 1� �'r L.0»s P .r1��nd be -�ko. l �• n }1 `� _ RUT particular action by the City, or its employeas, auced the alle ;ed damage ur Injury? (Include namss of employees, if Imam). tH. 1 +L - iht rnl l� ..H �q wn"^ J7 -- ,J o }..n.,.o,,.i• ^1.0 ,� n sc�4c4.\ tnr• rd f�� cl �ri lihat ns do you -Lim} Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar es o[ cowpbs•�o�ottthe of the Uttacb estimatucoribillanifepwsiblaJtbe basis r fig — s Total Amouo' Claimed, KAU and addresses of Witnesses, doctors, sad hospitals, - P ^-� °ls bin.(itrSt�n I'lc� q V- h All 1 Sec K - e4� Data _. �i _ � _4•' /3 I � . .. v GARY ..`BECK, D.D.S., INC. Petf"I's Nelne -� Date YOUR INVE5T1AMlN TNCNEMTNOFYOURMOUTN oe7e rmm the dots d oro pb 1, the and d@11 ne4 hwabY wkDOVdedpe reaelPS of a eD encyl obttpetbn la the 00" dental wwk d �� d'e _tOwn I eM"tlon I906,10M OA '• 910NATURE OF ` ' PATIEN7OR PAR17771F MANOR _ e16 WpeT POOTNNy sgUL[VMD. UPLAND. ✓�� T,. � ORNIA 017es TEL""6 17111 046.3436 PI'V - a..Z•. .: r •�. ,F,1 ) 1• y' 1 MOORE i SROk&, • BOBBY RAY JACKSON, Attorneys at. Law •r`1i 2 Suite 233, Exchange Building Claimant, ) SECTION 905 OF THE ) 7365 Carnelian Street pk •-2 3 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 �' r �< (714) 987 -7552 r 4 ) CODE ) G • 5 Attorneys for Claimant ' 6 THE CITY OF RAN(.'HO CUCN;ONOA, 7 B ) y <EF 9 16 7 /to Q�.j�7c"1t" C17Y OF NAKNO al PGA 'r ADMINISTHATN)N JUL OS 1986 E � ' 31 In the Natter of ) 1• I CLAIM OF BOBBY RAY E 12 BOBBY RAY JACKSON, ) JACKSON PURSUANT TO •r`1i 13 Claimant, ) SECTION 905 OF THE ) X05 pk •-2 CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT �< �R 14 vs. ) CODE ) G • ) - r .g 16 THE CITY OF RAN(.'HO CUCN;ONOA, 22a6 THE COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDINO, and ) y <EF 16 THE CUCAHONGA CODUTY WATER DISTRICT. ) i $ 17 j 18 TO, THE CLERK OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, THE CLERK OF SAN 19 BERNARDINO COUNTY AND THE CLERK OF THE CUCAHONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT T.0 22 Claimant is BOBBY RAY JACKSON of 8664 Fernwood, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 25 On or about April 28, 1986, at or near the hour of 900 p.m.-, y`tile operating hie motorcycle on Turner Avenue, and more specifically, t traveling mouth on Turner Avenue past Perron noulevard and approaching 27 28 the railroad crossing at 8th street, Claimant was severely injuied when � . 1 his motorcycle encountered a work of street construction which was wing 2 performed at said location, said work of street construction having been 3 abandoned for the evening having left a largo pile of chunked asphalt in 4 the middle of the roadway. 5 U At the time and place of the aforementioned event, the City of Rancho 7 Cucamonga, the County of San Aernardino and the Cucamonga County }later B District and their agents nsgligcntly failed to provides claimant with 9 safe use of a public street and to provide adequate warning that a 10 dangerous conditon existed, all of which resulted In injury and 1; 11 suffering to Claimant. p$ 12 13 As a direct, actual and proximate result of the aforementioned 6k {sa3� 14 negligence on the part of the above -named govsrnmontal agencies, and C 1 15 each of them, Claimant was injured in his health, strength, and QQc ipnZc 16 activity, Sustaining severe and substantial injuries to his body, ard, i p 17 further, sustaining Severe shock and injury to the nervous aystom, all 1Fry of which have caused and will cause him great mental and physical 1911aufferinq all to hta general damage in the amount of $175,000.00. 20 21 At the time of the injuries, Claimant was employed in his occupation as 22 journeyman electrician, and as a further direct, actual and proximate 7 25 result of the negligence of the aforementioned governmental agencies, e 24 and each of them, and by reason of the in Juries suffered by him, Claimant ` 26 has lost and will continue to lose substantial earnings.• 79ie exact < n 26 amount of earnings lost to date or Aich will be subsaquently lost in the ; 7 21 7 future is not known to Claimant at this time, liovevor, Claimant was, " or ` 29 , 'rz, earning $16.00 par hour and was working over fifty (50) bourn per week, i /11 1 IN' 1 I prior to the accident And that since the accident of Apr11 20, 1986, 2II as a direct, actual and proximate result of his injuries, claimant ! 3 not yet been able to return to work.. 51 As a further direct, actual and proximate result of the 11eq Iigence of tt 6 aforementioned governmental agencies, and each of them, claimant ha 7 sufferd property damage to big motorcycle in n sum not yet finally at 8 fully ascertained. However, the "Blue Hook" value for a motorcycl ' 9 such as that possessed by Claimant is valued at not less than $750.00 11 Asa further direct, actual and proximate result of the negligence of th, C 12 aforementioned governmental aq.•nciea, and each of them, Claimant wil. � 3 a x 13 incur eubstantiat expensen and inconvenience should the aformentionec a �uR 14 governmental agencies reject this claim without thorough and casplse( x s, t: _d ° 15 investigation as directed by the California Government Code In that ar 1 ° 15 unjustified rejection wi 11 result in the need for special hearings and 111 proceedings and thereby Inpose upon claimant further delay, 18 inconvenience, expense, and d.streas in his effort to recover the 19 injuries and damages sustained. 20 Claimant has been damaged as foll)ws, 21 i 22 1. General Damages in the sum of $175,000.00, !1 23 2. Hospital, medical, doctor, pharmacoutical. and other related) 24 incidental expenses in a sine not yet finally and fully ascertained; F 25 3. Loss of earnings in an amount not yet finally and fully ascertained; �§ 25 4. Property damage in A sum not less than 5750.001 27 S. Contingent damages which may be Incurred as the reaelt of ar. G28 improper rejection Of clelmant's,claim with said agency in an amount not J 1 1rJ n � '• •' ' t� l` 4 i�''1tl i• I '_ [ r :''� � /ail �:` �;/ry;;. k� I yet finally and tu!ly ascer,ai IAnY t(•,; g .i and all C.rsmnnICitlons or notices regarding this claim are to he sent 3 1i , to his attorney,. Cordon W. Price of gOORE i BROWN, Suite 233, drehange 4 Building, 7365 Carnelian Street, Rancho Cucamnga, California 91730. 5 4 '. 6 DATEDt HOORE i SROWH 7 8 9 •� ''COR90N W. PR1CL Attormy '� u 1J for''Clai) cant, !' BOBBY RAY JACY.SO!1 11 12 ,a- d JE s.• �• a' >. 17 19 20 21 s a �r 22 Y 23 �. 24 s 25 26 .'R k.: VC fa Y, �Y l R i s -.1 r' r��<v f ANT ",7.• _ ".Jii 1:R i:Fv<`":% :+r N1 r t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.1 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engle,eer SUBJECT: Release of Bands and Notice of Completion 'rae: 12811 -1 - located an the South strli of Sir enn Nest of Bean UEVELOPER: The Beer Creek Compa -ey 8480 Utica Avenue Ranc`o Cucanonga, CA 91730 ACCe�': Maintena.iLq Guarantee Bond $18,000.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $180,OOU.00 Monumentation Band $2,850.00 The requirea street improvements have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the 10% maintenance bond, authorize the City Egglneer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Band in the amount of $180,000. The monuments for Tract 12801 -1 have been set, the Engineer has ucen pa'4, and it 1s recommended that the monumentati_on bond be released. Continued... i �j • vhh City Council Staff Qeport Re: Release of Bonds j July 16, 1986 ' Page 2 ,l Y .( cr Tract 11797 - located North of Base Line and East of Archibald l' { DEVELOPER: Elite Develo;Aent Co., Inc. .a 17581 Irvine Blvd., Suite 107: Tustin, California 92680 Release: k Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $162,000 4l Reduce: Cash Deposit for Faithful Performance (Storm Brain) The required sui,a•t and storm drain improvements for the above tract have been ` completed in an acceptable manner and it is recarrtendec that City Council release the Faithful Performance Bond for the Stew Irupra +emenes and r6duce the cash deposit on file for the storm d{•aic 'ca•rienents from $22,529 to $16,800 releasing $5,73U to Elite 0evelopmen• he remaining $16,eoo will be hrld for one year to cover the Maintenance hd,irantoe periad as required i{y the imo.•ovement Agreement, {J Reese tfulty Subayitte -° 1 �.. LBM:bc .1 : +` 4 �� � -� ,. \`'n t.1i., ��y(l � t f.�.. + `iii �,LL�sf w 1N11• A 4 5 u. A RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RAIICHO CUCAMONGA P. 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HERZBY GIVEN THAT: 1. the undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nsture of which interest or estate is: Tracts No. 12801 -1 and No. 11797 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA, 9370 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box e07, Rar fio Cucamonga. California 91730. 0 ^�a 3. On the lfth day of aly, 1986, there Ws completed on the F hereinafter described real property the worL of unproven nt svt forth in the contract documents for:i Tracts No. 12801 -1 and No 11797 ,> ? 4. The name of the original contra,.tor for the work of iearovement ;=.F as a whole was: z Tract 12801 -1, The Deer Creek Company Tract 11797, Elite Cevalopeent Company, Inc. 5 The real property referred to herein Ic situated in the City of Rancho Cucamr1yi, County of Sau Bernardino, California, and is described at " follows: , :lr Tracts No. 12801 -1 and No. 11797 1• %';v' The street address of said property is N/A CITY, OF RANCHO COCAN,ONGA,' a= g`• "aQ; . '* Fwnicipal corporation, Owrier:l s�C ea Yl Lloyd Hobbs, City Enginee i June 23, 1986 + G cy of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 °asellne Road •.+ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 f Attn: Engineering Division ' Subject: Release of Honumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 128oi -1. Dear Gentlemen: Please find unclosed a letter of release from the project engineer as well as the tie notes for the monumentatior. for Tract 12801 -1. Based upon our agreement, we deposited a sum of $2,850.Oo for guarantee of the setting of thoeo monuments. Therefore, having completed thj terms of the monumentation agreement, we hereby request full refund of the $2,850.00 as soon as possible. If you have any comments or questions Please do not hesitate to fontact our office. Sincerely, ". Michael D. Vairin Director of Administration ?, and Planning HDV: jlp V h�M t + 2.� `���•jf W�t .� t.,4M DEER C(iEil(COt� MY 90tri TAMMY RANGY000CAMOt?GAG1L1t�RMAyITjO 9II �33e�t �tt N JM,>pr v ).� r _�C� r. ;'.; • � V �,,�+ l�.iv }" +'gCti s..wt°kKi si%' a�_ ��•,.. S �.c�'.lfUi��.�.f.: Ar.T.:r��p�h4+�•.., n'1. i L4 � It i N LOCA' iON: W0 /� 1 IMPROVEMENT BOND RELEASE CIIECK OFF Written bond release request received on 9 --� / by Water and sewer approved one___ y b Water and seder 4onds released on - Street improvementsA7 Final inspection e uested on Landscape(]' �M q ,t by_- 1.1.L:LJ P I LEA Final inspection made on_}_ Z-f — g b y . h-Ecr- Approvew Not approvedL on 2 3 py DEFICIENCIES O Clean -up list items not completed [7 Landscaping not maintained,in an acceptable condition [77 Streets not maintained in an acceptable condition L7 Tast reports not received [7 A.0 -est C Locyactfon L7 Other Street improvement performance bond approved fcr release on By: g Landscape performance bona approved for release on COMENTS 9/80 a 3 va �9t r f pt, "arar$ (. J,,�try��'y(}�^0' j'i� j•,.t e.. -.. {' .: - � 7 � •y• y' y1��1• /Yl�q ,, dT0.« t�.` e�v4ArFf .1�• }{:•Cw�TiflCii�aitjs ::�Y�u�+i,. , 1 (- y .J.fr'e .N.�'i'�Y'� r S • RESOLUTION- NO, •t4P'!vwvrt HG — aOS •. ., A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T11E CITY OF RANCHO._ -� CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA; ACCEPTING THE 1'jBLIC IMPROVEMENTS .•i FOR TRACTS NOS. 12801 -1 AND 11797 Ala, LUTHORIZING THE - FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THL %ORK - WHEREAS, the construction of p.fblic-ijurovcmentr, for Tracts Nos. 12801 -1 and 11797 have Dien- completed to thf satisOction of the City Engineer, and 11HEREAS, a Notice of Ccxpletion is requ• red to be filed, certifying � 1•+ the work cncplete. NUN, TNrREFORE, be it resolved, that t'ie work is hereby accep:^a :.:a •� the City Engineer is authorized to sign and f4le a Noti�- of Cumpletion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ' t T s �9t r f pt, "arar$ (. J,,�try��'y(}�^0' j'i� j•,.t e.. -.. {' .: - � 7 � •y• y' y1��1• /Yl�q ,, dT0.« t�.` e�v4ArFf .1�• }{:•Cw�TiflCii�aitjs ::�Y�u�+i,. , 1 (- y .J.fr'e .N.�'i'�Y'� 1 i �1. i A 7+ , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 91 q� T6: City Council and City Manager roe FROM: Lloyd 0. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Authorization for the City Clerk to Seek Bid Proposals,for the City Wide Emergency and Routine Equipment, Pavement Repair, Shoulder Grading, and' Debris Removal Annual Maintenance Contract The City`s annual menewable laintenance Contract has expired as of July 1, 1985. The purpose of this'agreement is to provide a contractual basis for emergency heavy •equipment rental to 'clear City streets of debris dvring storms and disasters and contract unit pricing for emergency or unusual repairs to Public Works Facilities beyond the scope of the Maintenance Division. RF.COMM ENDATIP•ri , It is recocmended that the City Counril authorize the City Clerk to seek bid propoals for the City Wide Emergency and Routine Equipment, Pavement Repair, shoulder Grading, and Debris Removal Annual Maintenance Contract. RSReu•fully suba tied, LSH:DS:dlw ax. cit ��1 A F - a i i Cyry OF ILINCHO CUCAMONGA sT"r, REPORT ®r-4-0 DATE: July 16, 1986 Z TO: City Council and City Manager On F70M: Lloyd B. flubbs, City Engineer BY: Davo Blevins, Maintenance Supe-intendent SUBJECT: Authorization for the City Clerk to seek Bid Proposals for the Annual City Street S%eeping Services Contract As of July 1, lga6 the City Wide Street Sweeping Services Contract with R. F. Dixon Company expired. The Purpose of the agreement Is to provid3 Supplementary street sweeping services to the City,s Sweeping Progrzm. RECOMW"TION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the C�ty Clerk to seek Bid Proposals for the Annual City Street Sweeping Service� :oatract. +Respu itteo, y if L M. B . tc. d u, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Mike Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: BASELINE SIDEWALK PROJECT .v n 4 \..: �F 1,7 1977 On June 4. 1986, Council awarded said project to the low bidder, Bob Britton, Inc. In conjunction with said project, Engineering staff sought and received a proposal for project administration and inspection from Administratigu Civil Engineering in the amount of $1,990.00. Submitted for approval and execution is the Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $1,990.00 to be funded from Beautification Funds. IECOMNENDATION• It is retoemended that City Council approve and execute the Professional Services Agreement for the project administration and inspection of the laseline Sidewalk Improvements for $1,990.00 to be funded from Beautification 7unds. LBH:ML:ko Attachments f. 40 CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manailer FROM: Lloyd D. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engiipneering TcchniLian ral Of SUBJECT: Tract 12772 -2I locatednonAthe %oathanside ofvBase Line. between Turner and Ramona Avenues, submitted by M & S Residential Development Tract 12772 -2 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1984, for the Di strict division o ated on the 15.2 acres into 81 of Oa et line, toe een Ramona Development l Turner Avenues. The Developer, M & S Residential Development, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements 1n the following ahounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $60,000 Labor and Material Bond: $30, MI schoolsdistr approval Cucamonga received from the District.9hC.C. &R.s hay.4aalsonbeen approved by the City Attorney. RECENCOATION approving Tract recommended 12772 -2 to accepting said greementpandtsecurity and authnrp to the or and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said moo to record. Respe tfully s It zed, LBH:LB w Attachments aq I 9 n. i ,i J V • 'L - • V.i' .tl RESOLUTION NG, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO ,. CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT XREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ANO FIMAi MAP OF TRACT MO. 12772 -2 lots, submitted WHEREAS, the i Tentative Develcopment Subdivider, "iucated onfthe = south side of Base Line, between Turner and Ramona Avenues h =.s been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Sbdiviaer and apr oved by, said City as pruvlded in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of .aid City;,ana WHEREAS, to meet the requirements estab•tshed as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has' offered the Ipprove:ent Agreement submitted herewith for, approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient ImPr,vement Security, and suMnits for anproval said Final Map offering for ded:cation for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REST, VED by the City Cruncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as *allows: y 1. That said In- ,,rovement Agreement be and the same it approved and :ne Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of •mid laity and the City Clerk is authorized to attest tkereto; and 2. gnat said Improveaent Security is accepted as good a:,d sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3 That the I'- ers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 3 om TRACE NO. 12772.2 ' u,n uw •L Y.r { � MT OY i1 pp[NN.WU,q 1fY[ y Gl /O�Yyf,6�� •OC`. G��. w in�ii��i� °'�Z �I�r�y�w�i� 4.'iFr�r'� . Y r�l p N[MAINO[R PAA1c1'[[L f� ;1 IT 4g 0 74 it t e8 1 ,n. y n• ,w • ," s, 4� rl F CITY OF PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: GiNE.F_RING DIVISfON 97 EXHIBIT. - s�,a "dc S.-,'; „•oM1'.�.- y.1G�'>`r.,F�.:�, ii.; ; •"'0,.,:!y�7:; 1111111111101"20 y2 F S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM'ONGA STAFF REPORT :t ^ S . • ;, �r DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager mn FROM: Lloyd 8. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Turnlrn Mamsaang, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Wilson, Inc.- Sheehan & Associates, for the Widening of Beryl Street f'•om Leman Avenue to Mandarin Avenue A proposal for the above subject services was received rrom Wilson, Inc. - Sheehan & Associates for the preparation of design and calculatlns, constru.tlon plans, specifications and engineer's estimate for the widening of Beryl Street from Lemon Avenue to Mandarin Avenue. This project will address tha need to widen the west sido of said Beryl Street, fronting the Alta Loma Junior High School, to the ultimate roadway width of 44 feet, from curb to curb. This project will be funded by Systems Oevelopm -nt. RECCIMENDATION: It 1s hereby recommended that the City Council approve the attached Frofessional Services Agreement for the widening of Beryl Street, from Lcnm Avenue to Mandarin Avenue for Wilson, Inc. - Sheehan & Associates for an anyunt not to exceed $13,750.610 plus 10% contingencies, and to authorlte the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said Professional Services Agreement. Re�ully suhm�ed, y LBfI: .bc Attachments K !e MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COCA STAFF REPORT n C o z OA;° July 16, 1985 i 1977 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. hubbs, City Engineer BY: Turning Mamsaang, Engineering AidE SUBJFCT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Wilson, i t and Crossing Padsat the Interse ction t ctionof Archibald iAvenue Rand ethe A.T. & S.F Railroad Crossing North of 8th Street A proposal for the above su6Ject services was rei. -ived from Wilson, Inc. - Sheehan & Associates for the preparation of design aid calculations, installation of aRubbereCrossinioPads�iat for the Avenue and the A.T. & S.F. Railroad crossing north of 8th Street. The improvement of said railroad crossing will complement the recently completed Archibald Avenue ! mprovements. The railroad crossing improvements will be funded by SB -325 Funds. REC6MMENMTICN: It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve the attached Professional Services Agreement for the installation of Rubber Lrosshiy Pads at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and the A.T. & S.F. Railroad Crossing north of 8th street, for Wilson, Inc.- Sheehan & Associates for an amount not to exceed $6,000.00 plus 10% contingencies from S8 -325 Funds, and to authorize the Mayor to execute said Professional Services Agreement. jesfully subm!tte , LOH :TM:bc Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: it.-ly 15, 1986 ST"F REPORT TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: LIOYO L. Nubbs, City Engineer hv: Richard COts, Associate Civil Engineer 51,'UwSCT2 APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR THE 1USTALLATIOh OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND THE DEDICATION Do- ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE clTy OF RANCHO CUCAMOhGA 'AND ARCIRE ANO BETH WILSON Attached art actor ante wit4 r iFidceartae l c"opqueis roftf ntts h e fzo1bo vte h e s uetfc6t i Pt A grOe fede ral wh rePbryj ecit n Funding, the City has Offered and said offer of $26,200.00 has been accepted by Archie and Betty Wilson in exchange for the dedication of right -of, -way easements Meng tole east side of Archibald Avenue innadiately north of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company, north Of Bas, Lino Road. Said improvements con�Jsting Of street pavement, concrete curb, ,t the sidewalk, and drive a4m'Ch will be Constructed in conjunction w, guh tter. City's widening Of ArchiLild Avenue and the Southern Paclfft: Transportation Company railway trussing north Of Base Line Road. RECOMMENDATION It is revonwnded that Council dl'bPt the Jtt5chad Resolution approving the Agreement for the installation of public improvements and the dedication of roadway right-of-way berween the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Archie and Sett) Wilson, and Authorize the Mayor to qXeCute said Agreeaent and the City Engineer to sign the attached, Right-Cf-Way Certificate Form A for the submission to CalTrans. -- --- City glyinee-r LBH:RC.ka 2k X EXHIBIT 14 -2a 1985 -6 Right of Nay CertifiLation Format A CITY OF R.MWO :UCAMONGA Ju 1E, 1986 RRP -gR078( ) Did T 0 ca icon A25h ) Fed. Grx Feaero Archibald Avenue Grxing PUC No. 280.522.9 tree , oab, or`,,ro ec ame ` Southern Pacific Transportation Company RailwAy Crossing North of Baseline Road �' 0O OS-bTTiiS :1 All required rfpnt of way for construction of t bal ow: his project has now been acquired, covered by Right -of -Entry or Order of Possession, as set in detail (Indicate status of Items through 7 below, using 'NONE' when applicable) 1 STATUS OF RIGHT OF NAY ACQUISITION a.p• a. Tctal number of parcels required 1 b. Parcels acquired outright —T-- ��+ c. Parcels covered by rfght•of -entry or order for possession. (Indicate effective dates). 2 (7/2/8�A 2 STATUS OF AFFECTED RAILROAD FACILITIES a. Railway easement executed ty the City on 5121186 b. Service Contract He. 591,104 being processed betveen CalTrans and Southern Pacific Transportation Company. 3. DESIGNATED MATERIAL SITES - Subject to bid solectfon. 4. DESIGNATED DISPOSAL AREAS - Nona 1, 3 c E)OIIBIT 14 -2b 1985 -86 1 5. STATUS OF UTILITY RELOCATION- NONE ' A. Status of RP.'ecatfon f Company Typo Facilf'y Relocation Type r 8. High and Law Risk (1) This will be a State adminlstered project and the klgh CJ H and low risk undergyround facilities meet Caltrans requirements for minimum clearance. or ,f. ' (p) L! This will ti a locally adalnistereo project and I certify that (L'c_al A9enLy) has been inforred in writing of!Caltrans high and low risk underground facilities policy. 1 am aware t4at the State assumes no liability for compliance or noncompliance with said poilty. 6. SCVEOULE Fv RChOVAL OF ';4PROVEMENTS AND OBSTRUCTIONS - October, 1986 T. UNAUrN0V1Zc8 ENCP.GACF4ENTS- i .,oNE .. f, 1 7� "Ny I M '.l is �It rr A EM1811 i4 -2e ' ' -• 1985 -6 - 8. CMPLIANCE WIBI FECERAL Ah0 SPATE REQIIIREYENTS REGARDING THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY ' I j• All right cf .ray has been acquired Ir accordance ,.fth Tide III oT the Federal Uniform Reloca&,n Assistance and Real - r- Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91 -646) and all applicable current FMWA directives covering the r r `• acquisition of real property or " h the acquisition of R1Sht of Way was not required. i -,` 9. COMPLIAW E WITH RELOCATION ADVISORY ASSISTANCE AND PAYNENTS ' PRCVISIOHS OF FEDERAL "AHD STATE LAW r' The project has no occupied parcels, and'ell persons hav,: been relocated to decent, safe and sanitary housing or have ',een - •' ? offered decent, safe and sanitary housing in accordance with tht current FHUA reguiatlors.•- No person displaced by this project ' has be,, required to vacate without at least 90 days written notice. ., a. Number of dwellings displaced _ 0 1. Owner occupied 0 „ J.. Rental Units 0 -r b. IZ Farm Operation(s) and business(es) displaced 0 or )] The project did not involve the displite =Ant of any Individuals. (arms, or businesses. I hEREBY CERTIFY the right of way m this project as conforming to ' Statement No. ( I] of Paragraph 5c of FMPM 6- 4 -2 -1. s AGENCY i y By • f� `A Date ' 4'Ir ` 5( • 1� _ ATI�RnpCHnrofI=resnAt YM EN/n BUtaE A _ gw aS onLy u ttA1n4� e rn 1R1 wwFY ac C"roic H 7n I dEX'.H:•I_BIT ., -I- It! r. ;. y0..'.•: r'i A s I -t jr' • x; SC. PACIFIC T2-US CO. 2^V PER CCC. ?ECO2_EC A.PR %. 19, SIB IU ecow 529 ?AGE fee, OF OFFICIAL 23CORC5 k I I 9 ..l 'EXHIBIT "BB" ?5 W'VVROADWAY BASEMENT To CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ZMSTAUMCNT' 1•,o Q6- RECORDED p 1986. 0 O O V O LI4° LOS 10 c. 1 (c APCHIBA.LD AVE _ •N�� 1 Co 75'WICE STRIP O:+LAMO (PARCEL 1) CONV£YBO To THE CDUUTY OF SAW BER1142CN10 51' ORCER OF CC1dCEUyATIOU RECOROED 5?PT. 22.1967, IU BOOK 4e94. PAGE 4256, OF OFFICtAL RECORDS. -G'WICe SLOPE I -• eAaeLl2u. —100' WICE STRIP OF LAUD C PARCEL 2) CCNVEyEO TO TH°_ COUIJTY OF SAN B£RNARDINO BY CRCER OF c•OROEijM_.TION R_COROEO SEPT 22.1967, IU BCOw. 6$94, PAGE S65. OF OF ?,CIAL RECORCS I) _ I ter- ivoT TO �yLL I ti I r •. 1> 2 Iu2 O'l Op �u � } �Q 3 Vz CF LOT Ic, B.r_Cvcu G_ Q ' .. +tscc PER 50cw6 Q U_ 1 1 S. P C c 4G.-+% CL VU LLW (1 N O Ill U ^' Z i 2 CC V (L WC Q ,n � Co 75'WICE STRIP O:+LAMO (PARCEL 1) CONV£YBO To THE CDUUTY OF SAW BER1142CN10 51' ORCER OF CC1dCEUyATIOU RECOROED 5?PT. 22.1967, IU BOOK 4e94. PAGE 4256, OF OFFICtAL RECORDS. -G'WICe SLOPE I -• eAaeLl2u. —100' WICE STRIP OF LAUD C PARCEL 2) CCNVEyEO TO TH°_ COUIJTY OF SAN B£RNARDINO BY CRCER OF c•OROEijM_.TION R_COROEO SEPT 22.1967, IU BCOw. 6$94, PAGE S65. OF OF ?,CIAL RECORCS I) _ I ter- ivoT TO �yLL I ti I r •. i i i ni r MCHICAID AYEAM . SoWam Pacific Trsnsportatim Cagan? Railway Cmss Upmnvnt 0/0 Base Lim pad � u .srrorw�d ?tCj��OCt- o/llrAet]tt>rmM 1 sir MOOai lWlm J� �Y ��SYII 1.'%. �;,.. ' •h"j%u9*S� +_Y� %N as_Crz.� -`,v`w EXHIBIT •A' i� tint EXHIBIT „A A° All O Y I O Q �wLV LW£ LC�10 ARCHIBGI_J AWE _- _ • 8 1o,1y92 i9 "NIC£ STRIP OF 1.6 ,0 CP?RCCL I) CONVEYED TO �i C. T JS COL'IJTY OF Sa.4 BER"WojkO BV CCC..'2 II SC. 91CIFICTaN9. n G= c"CBUyaTION RECORDED San 2z, 19G7. IN 'CO. R/W PER CCC. BCOK S.a94, PCCvE GSC.., OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. R°_CCROEO a.PRIL 19, 41915 BOOR s ecaK SZE; i 25 WIOf ' pp PAGE 1 PFI L }'RECCRCS I ROAOWAY I CASCMXHT , Si ICC' W ICE STRIP OF LAN 0,'. PaRCP_L 2) CCNV EyED TO 7t4E COVNTY OF S4N BER U+ROINO BY ORCER OP CONCES.INGTI,.IN RCCORDeo S£P, 2z. IS67. IN BCCSC 6894, PAG2 SGS, OP OPF;C11L R°_CCPC5• •� _ Z O O� ,, aQ ` O 0, U ` O ' c Z :E U I V I NOT 10 ZCAL3 °CLTH Vz CP LOT 10• ,SL= J E.CY1,.k,NG+ N C I Ol I ' 'T„•.3.1:t1H3,a•.0 a35 CC- ' 2a O +:L:. LMS PER BCCKG ,���' 1 .r U I 7 U I 11 W �, a J N CL j d TC ¢ t In .. L iq +��i4 J V Ilia(•, ! J C I'`. , �Y'•� \/ i 4t 211 =`4:n5��t�• i�Y, - ?t +1,1.: ., _..'rw 3:�16Z�.N'. RESOLUTION NO. ?L - a0 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND THE DEDICATION OF ROADWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY BETWEEN THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND ARCHIE 0. AND BETTY JEAN WILSON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY") has for its consideration an Agremnt executed by Archie 0, and Batty Jean, Wilson, husband and wife (hereinafter' referred to as 'DEVELOPER"). _as Joint tenants of 7074 Ramona Avenue (APR 202 =� 181 -09) for the installation o:• public improvements and the dedication of roadway right-of-way along the east sid„ of Archibald Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Transportation Cccgany'railway crossing, north of Base Line. Road; and WHEREAS, the CITY has (in accordance with ,ederal requirements for, the receipt of Federal Project Funding) offered the DEVELOPER fair market ^ value of 126,200.00 for the dedication of easements and the loss of private Improvements; and WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER has accepted the CIfY's offer and has executed easements for roadway and slope protection purposes for the construction of public improvements along the east side of said Archibald Avenue; and WHEkEAS, the CITY is agreeable to have such improvements constructed d as part of the Archibald Avenue and Southern Pacific Transportation Company Railway Crossing Widening project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Agreement for the installation of public improvements and the dedication of roadway right -of -way between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Archie 0. and Betty Jean Wilson be hereby approved and authorize the Mayor to execute the sage, the City Engineer to sign the Right -Of -May Certificate for submittal to CalTrans, the Finance Director to make pkvment in full of .$26,200.00 to the Wilsons, and elrect the City Clark to record said Agreement and Easement Dedications in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. .er — :�JX'c y+ ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gs STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 51 D T0: City Council and City Manager S FRR;: Lloyd 8 Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Ia�rovement Contract and Agreement for CUP 85.33, located at 9900 Arrow Route, submitted by Iglesla Del Nazareno CUP 85 -33, located at 9900 Arrow Route, was approved by Planning Commission on April 23, 1986. An Ir, -lieu Fee for undergrounding of utilities fronting 9900 Arrow Route is required prior to building permit issuance. Iglesla Del Mazareno has requested that the, City enter intq a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lein Agreement for one -half (14 the cost of undergrounding the utilities fronting 9900 Arrow Route. RECOME)IDATIOM It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said Rea's Property Improvement Contract and Agreement and cause same to record. Respectfully subm ted, LBH:LB. Iw \ ie 1 `ae e x , 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C'TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVIMENY cornCT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM IW.ESIA DEL NAZARENO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGI THE SANE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucazonga adapted Ordinance No. 58 an February 21, 1979, to establish requirements far construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, undergrounding of utilities is established gas prerequfsito to issuance of building permit for 9900 Arrow Route has been met by'entry into a Real Property Improvenent Contract and Lien Agreemnt by Igiesia Del Nazareno. NOW, THEPEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucm:nnga, California does accept said Real Property .Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sane, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SQ' "S i e� f ppw�1 �1 • t i ac A acr aw t�•' a.a us 3V AC li r.•���r isrn ' t amK :' T v ^ s � •.Ia K I' s r� 3 •0 i IYK f as 4 • S -t . . ✓ V yI� W. '^L C Ol� PROJECT:9400 ARROV ,RANCHO ROUTE/APN 208 -;21 -177 CUCAMONGA TITLE; liz, ENGINEERING DIVISION �fS� EXHIBIT; •�. Y.;"a.'4��1fr•pv .�.^i f \tr •• �r.T�_ .f:•.vv vpiSuf��'�%.�P r 'a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r„ STAFF REPORT c DATE: July 16, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvemnt Security for 7740 East Avenue, submitted by Wayland Gillesoie i The Developer, Wayland Gillespie, Is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of tl,e off -site" Improvements for a single fa�aily residence at 7740 East Avenue, 1n the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $9,500 Labor and Material Bond: $4,750 `V RECOMIEJIDATION It is recommended that the City Council adapt the attached resolution accepting said agreement and security and authorizing tLe Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. :�- Res ectful y Witted, LTV F % Attactccents " It •'i+ 1.1 . `/ •. �.'Yl hi i Y'4�i.. 0 �T. I i��`CC.S is fop ,: °} - •. s`', •r Vii. ii (r . , "'3 y lI' C t :+ y 3 1 f RESOLUTION 140. - D O rj J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO - CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVINR IMPROVEMENT AGREE {ENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 7740 EAST AVENUE WHERFAS, the City Council of the City of ,Rancho Cucamonga, "ilifornia, has for its consideration an ImprovenNst Agreement executed on June 30, 1986, by Wayland Gillespie as developer, for the improvement of - ' public right -of -way adjacent to the' real property specifical.y described therein, and generally located at 7740 East Avenue; and !7 ; WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described to said Improvement Agreement and scbject to the terms thereof, is to'be done In cunjunctio+ with the development of said real property, :^ WHEREAS, said lmpr.vetent Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, whIQ% is identified in said rr Improvement Agreement. NCW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement Agreement and said Improvemient Security be and the same are hereby approved and tLe Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. r A!I IRAO w ■. a,. E =c •ran - n�.uuw Titan k r �1LT r �40I •`p �.. rni' ♦ 1 I " 771 p Ic.l� I ' I a ;.,CITY OF PROJECT: 7740 EAST MV HUE/APN 227 - 261 -1D= r RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: t f; Y, ENGINEERING DIVISION �? EXHIBIT;- qn N1 � ""`'4i " *'�1, � .. .:rt:r ,{r C. .N. r+r.1 �°.�',h,iir''._M, .4N,r _ 'L °.`. .+i m.r ., +. <.>Sx.iG..,', ..5f•.5y{r{ CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 09 DATE: July 16, 1986 4 O �a 1` T0: City Council and City Manager GF +� tsn yl FROM: Lloyd B. Wubbs, City Engineer a. BY: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, School District Agreement and Right of Way Dedication On June 25, 1986 the Board of Trustees for the Central School District, at their regular board meeting, approved an rgreement between the School District and the City regarding certain public improvements at the Central School Facility In Rancho Cucamonga. e i In essence the District apprnved the dedication of School District property to provide for sidewalks and latdscape beautification workings along the frontagp of the Central School site and have agreed to participate in having the school parking lot area resurfaced prior to restripirg by the City as required by the sidewalk, planter and ornamental wall in_tallation of the sidewalk project At the District's request ono -x ;erase an additional walkway will be constructed at the sch.,ol site as part of the City's project The Districts participation in the overall proJeLt fne slurry seal and walkways was estimated at $6,900 prior to bidding of the project. This amount will be adjusted at the time of completion to actual cost. The execution of this document shall be contingent upon the award of contract for construction for Archibald Avenue Sidewalks. j y 8 !L':. City Council Staff Report Archibald Avenue Sidewalks July 16, 1986 Page 2 RECOOE=TIOIA: It is recannended that the Council approve Agreement with the Central School District for the installation of public improvements and dedication of rights of ways. The agrcaaent will construct improvyaen- at Central School in conjunction with the Archibald Avenue Sidewalk and Beautification project. Respectfully subI C 7AW-7 .BH:BNF:bc Attachments , �u .�1`7'Ia i •v�$.� • ��. � r � Y; O.�r�t"�iC =`�T w r �U 0 W, a I a� .- w�+p +.�.r�,yagM.r. -..u,a .a�,... •-t rk�.y,L1.•�w:n..,. -. o Y CO"CO M AC"OVM16DObCYf abba Witt^^. �r...:., agtM•�� Ma � cw.na.11c�it+:v:lu.ta_�a �rtL°.f%� t �!yy • e r :. l aiC.0•b'••q.- Jt' pq•dWll M'Anb T• - L OA••dbm•alitlewaawnc•dr•.ero. � V ��i ♦ gNnry IMMiN•MMVtlatl ', ice^ /� �QJ�fl1mhMMpgmpa•bnlMNa� iii :+isW NM1bo�tlW lMwpe�n. -wqR OIICILL wat �.C' AOI /IIMf 'qY• R.I.A/w• •s1q.' wry As •Y M�•YO NArt S0 t �!yy • e r :. l aiC.0•b'••q.- Jt' pq•dWll M'Anb T• - L OA••dbm•alitlewaawnc•dr•.ero. � V ��i ♦ gNnry IMMiN•MMVtlatl ', ice^ /� �QJ�fl1mhMMpgmpa•bnlMNa� iii :+isW NM1bo�tlW lMwpe�n. -wqR ■ ° .,R,. 11 lz �-.4, AaE CITY TY OF RANCHO CUB CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT f"$sWAY OMCATlON MR 3rR1 RlU y OF SAN BERNARDINO o:.•✓. 1• �rav ..,�: "1?'. +APN e,:1077- 634.01 ..%�YT�.�AI,11F1 /df:dN:INAA:_ R4r Ir i APN 1077 -342 'LOT C' I ,. OW44 -%ar a 4 4l aliir r �• 4927' 1 s 1 W y < - e n ii =om J :may f m IIJJ��`Z 7 NTS n a S■ , r Y a c 8 ` °vim i w C°SN C •' I I pp 6 f°� t ",8 r r o \I V u � ■ ° .,R,. 11 lz �-.4, AaE CITY TY OF RANCHO CUB CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT f"$sWAY OMCATlON MR 3rR1 RlU y OF SAN BERNARDINO o:.•✓. 1• �rav ..,�: "1?'. +APN e,:1077- 634.01 ..%�YT�.�AI,11F1 /df:dN:INAA:_ R4r Ir i APN 1077 -342 'LOT C' I ,. OW44 -%ar a 4 4l aliir r �• 4927' 1 s f IIJJ��`Z 7 NTS n r r'i n � O o °a I Q t _ _B.AN_@Ji8(I(1F I O RQ� APN 1077 -641 -66 FCRTION OEOICATED FOR Piaw- OF - N'Ay ' iA !e O SCALE ev, 02 24 16: •' !r/%fira� O CITY TY OF RANCHO CUB B f"$sWAY OMCATlON MR 3rR1 RlU y CE7.71tAL SClIOOL DXTIiCT OF 8AN o:.•✓. 1• �rav ..,�: "1?'. +APN e,:1077- 634.01 ..%�YT�.�AI,11F1 /df:dN:INAA:_ R4r Ir iA !e O SCALE ev, 02 24 16: •' !r/%fira� O ,ii: +3s:,i^•`• `r`: aet,i }`'+i i/.�%`1+f4.'�5'' 3' ;':= '„�'F.}s R".Y b� L /9rdy;,s ar` 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t G, e .r s- STAFF REPORT DATE: Ju'.y 16, 1986 ` I - 1 TO. City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enqineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvemen£ Extension Agreement and Imp•ovement Security for Parcel Map 8116 'coated on tho south side of Ninth Street, betwenn Bowen and Covet, submitted by Gilbert B. Rodriguez Parcel Map 8116 was approved by the City Council on April 3, 1986. The Developer, Gilbert D. Rodriguez, submitted an agreei'mnt and sec' °ity to _ guarantee the construction of the off -site lmprovenents Ir. the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: S8,200,00 Labor and Material Band: 14,100.00 , At this time, the developer is requesting approval of a twelve month extension I i, on sale lmprnvement agreement. RF-CO?NEe7ATIM ;. It is :acowmended that the City Council adept the attached resolution, accepting said extension agreement and security and d'ithorizing the Myver ane, .y City Clerk to sign said agreement. f Re c ful I ube,,ftte 3 )� LB4:L lw ((/�j . Aftachments " � 1e !^���•'d1r��:-.'�A.� '`�' 'd• -'.d. '•irk° �� `" •')'iW �. , cS. ?r? a'',•y.Qb'r 5a is w 1 �•• - 1+'^t�. , aW„?;•'�r)T. ,.,. '.ly'i`•�' t� s �,�.pt 7'�''F,�r�ti.: �,, "+c�: ",I•.,`r� Y±"±i >: ,,. Y t: t,•r� ✓ �°�zaY3yt,,.3 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTIO8 OF THE CITY CObNCIL OF ME CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND 1WROV0 ENT °ECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 8116 OEREAS, the City Council of the City of 'Rancho Cucaronga, California, has for itc consider6trion an' Iw'avement ExtensionkAgreeaent executed on June 26th 1986;,"by ?ilbert U. Rodriguez as developer, for the imilrovcuent of public right- of- way'adjacent to the teal property specifically described therein, and generally locatod on south side of Ninth Street, between Covet and Itowen and h'HEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement 4areepent' and subject to the Yams :hereof, is to be done in conjunc,lon with the develooam t; of said Parcel Y.ap 8116; and IMERCAS, said lmprovemen: -Extension Agreement- is secured and accompanied by good aid surf Went - Improvement Security, which is idzntified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. , r HON, TIiEREFOW, BE IT•,PESOLVED by the City Counc +l of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that sail Improvement Extensioo Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the sane are h7 et-y approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Imprcvemnt Extension Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. Yf r; rV 4-1 b� yc A SW` a ti , I --- ZT - IYIY YrIM / CITY OF PROJECT.. iarcel Yap 8116 ;+ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DNIISION &fZ EXHIBIT: t .. .l �' ,fit. .-�l'. . �'�' • i�- l�Ct�i V, CITY OF. RANCHO CUCAMONGA may,:• 'i t -' eio STAFF REPORT DALE: July 16, 1986 4 a *, TO: City Council and City :tanager #' FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Mike Long, Senicr'Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF LEMON AVENUE FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND THE U )ROVEMENT OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM LEMON AVE.YUE TO BANYAN STREET On June 4, 1986, "ouncil awarded the subject project to Laird Construction. In conjunction with said project, Engineering staff received a proposal from GHJ, Inc. for soils and materials testing in the amount of $4,358.00. Submitted for approval and execution is s Professional Services Agreement in the ,mount of $4,358.00 to be funded from Systems Funds. ' RECO.MMENDATiON It is recommended that City Council approve and execute the Professional v Services Agreement to CHJ, Inc. in tho amount of $4,358.00 to be funded from Systems Funds. > Respec ully su ted, Lloyd Hubbs,, City gineer d LOH:ML:ko Attarhments i ��•� 1��' 'a,:. 4'r' � rjT • r. .. .�w ' �• ..y f•,;.t •�J.y.T �`2 , Y'c. ,�� ,gym CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NGA DATE: STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: � BY: SUBJECT: ��•� 1��' 'a,:. 4'r' � rjT • r. .. .�w ' �• ..y f•,;.t •�J.y.T �`2 , Y'c. ,�� ,gym CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NGA STAFF REPORT a � %> July 16, 1986 Cit Council and Cit Mana er W 1 Y Y g Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of a Pipeline License, between the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and the City, in.connection with Tract 12530 located on the west side of Hellman, south of Baseline The Southern Pacific Transportation Company has issued the attached Pipeline License to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of a storm drain pipe beneath the tracks in connection with the devetopwnt of a residential subdivision located on the -rest side of Hellman, south of Baseline. All construction stipulate, to the agreement has been constructed at this time. RECQV MOATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution E approving the Pipeline License between the City and the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign• tame. \� Rezpegt /fully subm led, x t*;l 56 ,w.r, �..'M-'Yf�?i}�f:F'� !i•tY�.} -+ yi',�' ?J, +` —, ay � w y,. .,ti' '�:'��ili:Ly*� yj�, RMLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE SIT: COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICENSE BETWEEN THE Cl: AND TICE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRRISPORTATION COMPANY FOR TiiE INSTALLATION OF A STORM DRAIN P ?PE BENEATH THE RAILROAD TRACKS kiiEREAS, a storm drain pipe is tepuired to he installed beneath the { Southern Pacific Transportation Company tracks for project Trert 12530 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, has for its consideration a Pipeline Licenso between the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and the City for the right to install the stone < drain pipe at the above location NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolv>d by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Pipeline License be and the same is hereby approved by the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign sane '+ on beialf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. i' i .iii � ?��. �., al•_';'r__ +_?` ��iti m p Y �aaa� is e�•�',�yi�Y q r tiµ !c7 �y �.a..• •� 1 F�ti ; � I •r � \r I Storm Drain Easement IN Eo t ' sT f +f�4f 1�>Fy � It y y� � ` Y/f•nwsv car a S Y I• \14619 +� ®t4V V �' i I G r I `I Nf✓• �� I I { jjjSSS{��� • I mr ♦ F i ., 1�, •• =W .A I III PAlO�A _�. tar / J lli ♦ f - , r CITY 0 - �^ \ RA F PROJECT:__ T tz_ �gn RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: � j..&NGINEERING: DIVISION &' E oaf _ s.R!^ Tta t; =6 :•y�„�"L'''f�.P��y�'flh :2.� { ^ +r :_ > ! 'e T,,`h.<>;•J;.!i>LX CITY OF:RANCFIO CUCAMONGA t i; EAFF REPORT C 0 n 9 g r �w� r DATE: July 16, 1966 TO. City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Mike Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: The Improvement of the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks r t On July 2, 1906, Council awarded sail 7roject to Hubbs Equipment and Construction for the low bid of $199,717.60. Contract documents are now submitted for approval and execution by City Council. This project is funded from SR 325 Article 3 and Beautification Funds. •` _ HECOMIEDDATIOW It is recommended that Citlr Council approve and execute the contract . documents for the Improvements of the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks in the aocunt of $199,717.50 to the low bidder, Hobbs Equipment and -' Cocstructlor.. Project funding will come from 59 325 Article 3 and Beautification Funds. ectfully su tt�e�d, 4' LBH:ML:dak +Y 'L•.7:•el�SK'a,.x� i+_171�.'S;v �t lr' R. yy. a+ t_ i. t e 61 ac - lY`] , .v .., ";Yt'd.5i,'"y"?4`S.'o :tyro- ^!i' :. {= 6!•d ,�'T,'-t-�'- r; ,�_. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . STAFF REPORT, Date: July 1D, 1S86 To: City Council and City Manager Frog. Bea Smiderle, Community Services Department Subject: Henry Albert Building An July 7, 1986, the Histcric Preservation Comission held an advertised Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to Council for Historic Landmark designation for the Henry Albert Building, located at 7136 Amethyst Avenue. Mr. John Valentovis, property owner submitted an application for consideration by the Comisston for designation as a Historic Landmark. The Historic Preservation Comission finds that the Henry Albert Building, constructed in 19200 and used as a Drugstore, Library, Barber Shop, ane Post Office, has met the criteriA established in Ordinance 70 and, therefore, recrcrrends it be designated as a City Historic Landmark. That the City Council ,esignate the Hen.y Albert Building as a Historic Landmark as requested by the Historic Preservation Commission. a0 a 411 WO .1) cif Y yty h_4.1. -...�, Z �. "y •:ayral- TKr h P ILSOLUTICS NO. 86— ;:>I �. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIT CODBCLf, OP IRS CITY Of RANCHL CUCAMOSGA, CALIFORNIA, RICOGNIZING TER HEART ALBEIT BUILDING, LOCATED AT 7136 AMETHYST STREET, AS A SIGNIFICUT HISTORIC FEATURE OF TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA AND IND 019 D98ICNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LARDMAR VNERRAS, the City Connell of the City of Rancho Cucawuge, California, has adopted Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cocasonfa My ' ipai Coda relating to historic preservation; and k ' VBEREAS, the Reecho Cuc&men=a Katorie .reservation Cnrdsaion hap i"estigated tho bistnric significance of the Story Albert Rulldloat and bas bold public hearings concerning this site in accordance eritb Chapter 2.24 of a the Rancho Curampga Moaicipd Code relating to historic preservation; ad V3IREAS, the Historic Preservation CDrideslon has found the Story Albert Building to be a signifieant historic feature if the City, and cheteby recommeads it for designation as a. lq Ki -toric Landmark. ■W. TRE1170I2a BB IT RESOLVED by the City Connell of the City of Rancho Cucawaga, California, an follorllt The City Council finds and datOrmineo that the Vcary Albert Ieilding, {� located at 7136 Acetbyaq Las net the criteria as[ablishod for doal3nation as a City Ristc—:e Landmark, and therefore, tad mith the recoamxndatioo of the Eistoric Preservation Commtesion, desiioates rbis site vs a city Historic Laodaark. t L PASSED, APPROVED, acd ADOPTED this day of , 1956. F N F_ ...t �; - �!? °.H :':t �w•Y`'4.ii�: et:,;?e;t�',.,P °,I:r. -' :n�b�rY'-.'"�K� Made f: n tr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: July 9, 1986 °" To: City Coencil aad City Managdr From: Oi11 Holley, Dirsrtor, Conemnity Services Depar�tG�erTt fl): Karen McGuire -Emery, Assistant Park Plann G 47 Sub,ect: Approval to Distribute Requests for s s fur Professional Services for a Comprehensive, City -wide Trail Plan Background: On June 25, 1986, the Planning COW SSid.. directed Staff to prepare a report for City Council ragarding the Trai s lr.,pleoentation Program. (See attached Staff Report, Dated June 25, 1986.) The Community Services Department, in conjunction with the Planning Department, is now regwesting authorization b distribute Requests for Prq,csals fer a Comprehuns've Trail Plan for the Lift of Rancho Cucamocga. A tease cow,,nttee will be assembled to evaluato the propttals received. This cmmittee will be made up of one Planning Corteission Member, one Park Development Commission Member, one Community Development Planning Staff Nember, and on. Commur "y Services Department Staft Member. Once a consultant has been selected, a broader base committee will be torrva to work with the consultant in formulating the actual trail plan. This connittee 't likely to include members from the existing Equestrian Trails Conmittee, bicyclists, hikers as well ets non -trail users. The lity has alreAdy completed i large portion of the survoy of existing easement dedication_ for the local feeder trails and romenlnity trails. The Equestrian Advisory Committee has been appointed and Equestrian Trail Guidelines have been adopted to establish der.ign standards for the construction of all three trail types. The prirary role of the consultant will he to provide a palicy plan for implementation of the Conmunity and Regional frail System and a few vital local fetder train linkages. nncP the Policy Plan has been accepted, the Consultant will prepare a specific Plan for the Trails Program which will be required to facilitate actua'. property acouisition and construction of the individual trails proposed. Recorunendation: That City Council authorize the distribution of Requests for Proposals for ,i. a Comprehensive Tra L rlan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. r , i T rY�x i ' . . � . +�a t�. ..:. CAeT .y r� } Y i f. h� ;1 i t I CITY Re aANCH0 CUCAh10N0A STAFF REPORT DATE: June 25, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRO:i: Brad,Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: TRAILS On I•lay 28, 1986, the Planning Commission held a discussion on the status of Trails and the proposed development of a Trails Implementation Plan. The Planning Commission unanimously directed Staff to forward to the City Council a request that Trails be given consideration in tie 1986 -87 Work Program /Budget. The City Council at their Juno 5, 1986 Budget Workshop concurred with the Planning Commission's request and directed Staff to prepare a report with budgetary estimates. Since that time, Staff has had several meetings with the Community Services Department to develop a joint effort on this matter. The Community Services Director and myself have concurred that both departments must be actively involved in this project, but that one department should take the leadership role. We believe the Community Services Department would be the best choice in heaJing up this project. Their department's long range goals and objectives as well as their 1986 -87 Work Program and current staffing can better facilitate this leadership role. Staff believes that it would also be extremely helpful to develop a Committee to work with Staff an this matter. Staff recomnends that the Committee be comprised of one Planning Commission Member, one Parks Daveloprient Commission Member, one "=nity Development Planning Staff Member, and one Cornunity Services Department Staff Meotber. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission review and consider the reel on ou ned above and direct Staff to prepare the City Council Report. Resp .0ly s "ad, Brad Buller City Planner 80:dak Y I 1 ITEM K 1 • i .;yv '4 M INSTRUCTIONS FOR RECORDS INVENTORY WORKSHEET DEPARTNEVT Administrative Services FILE CAB. NO. DRAWER NO. LOCATIOY Storage SHELF CASE N0. SHELF NO. PACE NO. OTHER PREPASED BY /DATE E. Stoddard _ VOLUME (CU.FT.) INCLUSIVE DATES 11 -30 -77 thru 6 -30 -84 SERIES TITLES) 6 DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS REMARKS: The folloaicg records dated 11 -30 -77 tbrougb 6 -30 -84 art being requested for destrantions Accounti Payable Accounts Receivable Audit Correspondence Fl,es Back Deposits BanL• Reconciliations Bank Statements Bank Stubs and Caaeal Ltd Cbeeks Business License Correspondence Busiceso Licenses CFTA Payroll PLles Closed Business License Ji les Daily Caeb Rensipts Ecployes Cross Forcing, General Caeb Receipts Pay Tim Cards Payroll Deductions Payroll Journals " Regnant for Payseot Vacation and $Lek Leave Records FOR DESTRUCTION BY ATSO /i I DISPOSITION OF RECORDS. T+RtS ' .I .1 66- l` f i L`1 14 '.rn B I w N. ,: RESOLUTION No. gG a/3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ADTH(M= BG THE DESTRUCTION ON CITY RECORDS ARID DOCUMMS WHICH ARE NO LONGER RDQUIRIm As PROVIDED unsR CoynxilieNT P^DE EECTICN 74090 WHEREAS, it has been determined that destruction of certain City records under the charge of the Administrative Services Department are no larger required for public or private purposes. NHEld.IS, it bas beta determined that destruction of the above- mentioned material$ is necessary to comma storage space, an reduce staff time, expense, and confusion In handling, and informing the publiel cad VHERRAS, section 74090 of the Covernment Coda of the state of California authorizes the head of a City departawnt to destroy any City records end document* which are over tiro years old under his or bar charge, without making a copy tbaeof, after t11e as" are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written comment of the City Attorneyl and WHEREAS, it is tboraZore desirable to destroy said records as lilted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and mde.a part bor*of, in storage, without mixing a copy thereof, which are over two yeara old; and WHEREAS, said records have been appro.7d for destruction by the City Attorney. NOW, TMErOR1, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA DOES RCSOLVE AN FOLLOOSI SECTION It That approval and authorisation ds hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part tersof. SECTION 2s That the City Clark is authorized to allot exedaetioo by and donation to she Department of Special Collection$ of the University Research LUrary, University of California, or other historical society designated by tbt City Council, any of the records described in Exhibit "An attached hereto and made a part hereof, except thou deemed to be confidential. 1111712-11 That the City C1.uk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, end theccefortb and thereafter the tars @ball be in fall force gad offset. PASS®. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this litb day of July, 1966. (,1 i �C _ •' � � � . ' r• nor � . . r ' • rJA• Sxbibtt "4" The following retorda dated 11 -30 -77 tbrougb 6 -00 -84 are being rulu•ist" for destructions Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Audit Correapondeucs Files bank Deposits Bank Reconciliations Bank statements Bank Stubs and Cancelled Checks Business Liccass Correspondence Bosiaese Licenses CRT► Payroll Files Closed Businsaa License Men Daily Cash Receipts Employee Grose 94rn1002 General Cash Receipts pay Tine Cards Payroll Deductions payroll Journals Ragpast for Payment Vacation and Sick Lesee Records 67 A r •:r , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OATS: July 16, 1956 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Ja.ry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Establishing a Fee of 925.00 for Amending Tax Statements on Prepaid Assossunts. EVALUATION: The prepayment of a 1915 Bond Act Assessment prior to the second Installment ca:cessitatsa the jeneration of an amended tax statement. The County cof San Bernardino season a twenty -five dollar fse per amended tax etatemsnt. Therefore, staff desires to page this cost along by establishing a twenty -five dollar fee for amending tax statements. RECOWNRNDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached resolutlou establishlc:g a fee in the aucunt of $25.00 for amending tax statements on prepnid assessments. Respectfully Submitted, 40e.- L R� Assla4 CSty Manager RR:JBF:kmm L v �� M 0 ':"j RESOLUTION NO. A Eocolutlon of the Clty Council of the City of Rancho Cucanoala. Califcrnia> establishing a fee of 026.00 for amending ta.c statements for prepaid assessments. Whereao, tow City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dooms it nacesnary to metabllsh A fee in the amewit of 9:16.00 for aaendInC Lax statements for prepaid assessments. Whereas, the fees x111 be used for the required paymont for amended tax statrments applicable to prepaid assessments. Approved and adopted -this F` 1 day of 1966. /mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga State of California Atteatx City Clark. City of Rancho Cucamonga State of California 0 aJ 1 +• 4,•1 t ��1 Y� , i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r ' DATE: July 18, 1988 TOt City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Establishing a Fee of 87.50 each for Prepayment Calculations on 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts. EVALUATION: The City of Rancho Cucamonga presently process upwards of five- hundred 1915 Bond Act Assessment District prepayment calculations annually. The cost of this service Is rapidly Increasing. Staff believes that a fee should be assessed for this service. This position and policy is not uncommon among many municipalities whose fees range from 85.00 to 828.00 per calculation. A foe of 87.50 per calculation will address Rancho Cucamnnga's needs. This fee would be used to offset annual opera -Ing cant of networking with the County of San Bernardino's main Computer, implementation of Rancho Cucamonga's Geographic Information System for labor, materials and supplies used in administration of assessment districts. RECOMMENDATIONt Otaff recommends the, City Council approve the Resolution establishing a fee in the amount of 97.50 for each Prepayment Calculation on 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts. Respectfullyyyy Submitted, 40 'Opt yO Assi t nity Manager 70 �_ S: LM i i f RBSOLDTZON NO. 3G -- ass A Resolution of the City Council of Rancho Cucaccnga, California, establishing a fee of $7.60 per calculation for 1916 Bond Act Assessment Districts. Whereas, the City Council of the City of Rancho Rucamonga dseme it necessary to establish a foe in the amacnt of 67.60 for the prepayment of caljuletione for 1917 Bond Act Asseament Districts. Whereas, these foes will be used for administration of Assessment Districts. Approved and adopted this _ day of 1965. Mayor Olt/ of Rancho Cucaaonge State of California Attest, City Clark City of Rancho cucamonga State of Californla 4 }l i. 1 CITY OF RANCFTO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager PRCH: Robert Rizzo, Asaistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Pulwood, Ansseesent Revenue Coordinat: SUBJECT: Dissolution of Tract No. 12414 from Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and Refundo to Property owners. Background: On December 17, 1986, The Hsallton Ranch Home Owners Association expressed concern about Tract No. 12414 Inclusion within residential Street Lighting District No. 2. Ms. Tracey Pfutzenrenter of Mercury Property Management Inc. of 7366 Carnelian, Suite 239, Rancho Cucamonga has been working with Staff in resolving thin matter. Evaluation: On May 2, 1984, Resolution No. 84 -123, Intention to Order the Annexation to Lighting Maintenance District No, 2 AnnuHatlon No. 3 was adopted. On June 8, 1934, Resolution No. 84 -170 accepted the final Engineer's Report for Tract No. 12414. However, Tract No. 12411 is within a private street, and it should not have been annexed Into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. Recoamendvtlons Staff recommends the dlosolutlon of Tract No. 12414 from Annexatlon No. 3 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and refund of assessments collected from proparty. R``eooPectfully Submitted, A�0 Aisle City to Manager RR:JBFtkam 7a I CITY OF RANCHO COCAidONGA STAFF REPORT rly 16, 1986 �f 4hs TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Svnior Planner SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON PROPOSED AINEXATION OF SAN BERNARDIKO Or ABSTRACT: outlines e u Control District lands and notes alternatives t esavailableetothe City Council. BACKGROUND: As a result of the City's concArns with the Fourth Street li-ock-rr-iffslfier. the City Council requested staff to initiate discussions with the County authorities with the objective of annexing the Flood Control District's land north of the City. At the Limo, it was noted that County support (or acquiescence) would be a virtual prerequisite for the annexation. At this point, the County indicates it may support the annexation IF an agyreement can be reached betweer, the City and the County Flood Control Dis:rfct. This agreement would determine future land use and densities on lands which the District owns but which may become surplus. At a recent meeting, Mr. Ken Miller of the Flood Control Oistrict, indicated there may be very substantial acreages availabl, tor future development once the Deer7Day ree wa er projects are com :d. Mr. Miller stated the District is in the process of fdentffyfn, ctly which lands would became surplus, and indicated the District wl., submit an initial land use proposal to the City in the near future. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? For obvious reasons, the County's support for the annexall—on-T-s-s-ETTI necessary. If the City and the District can reach an agreement on what is an appropriate land use and density for the surplus areas, the City will have roe following options: 1. Enter into an Annexation /Development Agreement with the District, followed by the City's petition to annex supported by the County. (It should be noted that the County's legal staff may not support this concept due to a conservative interpretation of State law relating to Development Agreements.) j � {A a* y s Status Report San Bernardino County Land Annexation July 16, 1986 Page 2 2. /wend the City's General Plan and prezone the land, followed by the City's petition to annex, supported by the County. (This would give the District no long -term guarantees as to the land use following the annexation, and the cowaitment on our part would be relatively informal.) If time City and Flood Control District cannot ree,h an agreement, the City could prezone the land and pursue the annexatitn. However, such an effort vould host N'cely be blocked at the County. CAN WE DO ANYTHING NON? Another option the City Council has would be to prezone the land now, and pursue the annexation •Independently of the negotiations with thu District. However, since se ey not know which lands the District considers surplus and in•ends a sell for development, such an action on the City's part t Md appear prcaature and possibly cou.aterproductive in our work with ;rva District. A more constructive approach may be to continue to work with the County and the District, to develop a land use ppl.n both the City and County can support, and to continue to oppose tie Fourth Street Rock Crusher vigorously WHAT HAPPENS FOLLOWING ANNEXATION? Feen if the City were to succeed to annexing Flood Cont-ro-F-T-awds-5-TTe :ity, there are sxae legal questions which remain to be answered. Ths t:ity Attorney's meamo attached to this report outlines the issues in detail. However, the main points ale highlighted below: A. The City's ability to impose 'land use controls on land owned by the County may be limited, deppending on how the land :s used. Current laws glue us the ability to control land use on the Flood Control District's land, but „ot on County land. If it- desires, the County could pprobibly retain land use controls over the land in question ihrough mmership transfer or other mechanisms. m B. If the Rock Crusher is issued permits by the County of San Bernardino prior to the actial annexation and the operator commences constrwtion, ho will retain certain vested rights to r continue the operation. As a result, the City will not have full control over the project. Please see the City Attorney's memo for more detail. 4 r . L!; ii �. ,. ! .1`:'x ! • � r .' r ,. r; »: � j,.� t s:}iSs itcr,* Status Report -: t ,,1,, . •, a'•'M1w >••tf San Bernardino CoLnty•Land Annexatim Sty` July 16, 1965 SBMA{ARY: County support for the potential annexation rs essentlal and r s c c ngent upon successful negotiations betteen the City and rnun• *y F�lodd en g.strfct relAtive to future- usa of flood contr, ` lands. Resp �1 /4ubmitt "d. � t i Brad Buffer,•`; -i City nner Z1 BB:oK•r .1 r; Attachment: City Attorney's Memorandum ' Area Map r• , rl VV d'� G Y~lrj'•. 1.i.• 3t i:M1. • '• �� 1 , , Vu`M1�� °- j`��'i�"+{�Y •�`tS r'S.Kxfi:�C'yf6iv?tn�1XE '-� /,_ _•��.,e1�rf• �i. '•'� •. r,! +p�E.' {e� }"_.,qrr" - �J: �P Y�'{IV.� { -YAi + `�1•Fi ♦ w• . ���- n,:�•1S�isN lit 7 I At the last Council meeting, this office was aske, to supply information related to the above topic. he questions related to the fact that there may be processed an annexation of certain property from unincorporated County area into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. That nrop- rty is owned by the County Flood Control District and there is being pro,=sed the development of a rock crusher plant with ar ancillary reclamation plan on the subject p operty. As a pre- iminary wetter, it in rlear that the / ..11altRn.in. Q:• �yy���r��rti.�' = CCII ONC C Vlc ccK w CIMLC '...T.. ILOfIR JwNCi l....... 1.0 OOII IOC. wNOPM V .L 11C Ifn iC1 OR CI, GLIIONNIw 111611.101. NwLRN O nAMCOM O Gw10 IOM III. /.10.004/ TCLVIrO1rC�Olil N w11TNw JO OII.LG VOI• `` Jill c° tffiMORANDUM TO: Members of the City Council of the mining the zoning that will apply to such City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: James L. Markman, City Attorney City of Pzncho Cucamonga RE: Ability of Developer to -aoplement Plans d4 for Rock Crusher Plant in the Event of Annexation of the Subject Property to the zoning or zone change mechanism aet forth in the the City of Rancho Cucamongi At the last Council meeting, this office was aske, to supply information related to the above topic. he questions related to the fact that there may be processed an annexation of certain property from unincorporated County area into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. That nrop- rty is owned by the County Flood Control District and there is being pro,=sed the development of a rock crusher plant with ar ancillary reclamation plan on the subject p operty. , ,r As a pre- iminary wetter, it in rlear that the City of Rancho Cucamonga may "pretane" the subject Drop- = arty whether or not an annexation ultimately ensues. The authority for pre- zoning of property is stated succinctly in California Government r_, ;i Section 65859 as follows: "A city may ore -zon,i unincorporated territory ' adjoining the city for the purpose of deter- mining the zoning that will apply to such #• property in the event of subsequent annexa- '�,� tion to the city. . d4 Prc- zeaing is accomplished simply by applying F± the zoning or zone change mechanism aet forth in the Development Code and the California Government Cods to the rropert;l in question. This may be accomplished with or without the consent of the property owner. It usually l J.R •c =V. r S.1 /��1 •I�ir :1, ,4YV= , ,r is of benefit to property owners to know what the zoning a talus of their property will be if they are to be asked to consent to ar annexation. Also of concern with respect to this matter is the question of when a devclop;r,aequiros a "vested right' to place a development on property. If a developer acquires a "vested right ", the change in applicable zoning codes or new zoning codes (if annexation ensues) will not preclude com- pletion of the development. In the particular situation before the City Council, if the County grants final approval for the construction of a rock crusher plant, it becomes imperative for the Council to understand what the Council's zoning prerogatives may be with respect to the subject prop arty if annexation occurs. The controlling California case with inspect to the establishment of vested development rights iq Avco 1-1. �. ,u uyazj. in cnat case, Avco owned approximately 8,000 acres of land in Orange County, a small portion of which was located in a coastal zone. prior to 1983, Avco obtained all zoning, tentative and finr, map approvals and had completed or was in the process of constructing storm drains, improvement utilities and other facilities for the subdivision tract. flowever, no building permits had been issued for the construct-on of any residential unit. The company had expended Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) and incurred additional liabilitien of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000.00) to the point in time in issue. In 1973, the Coastal Commission Act went into effect and the Coastal Commission asserted control over the process claiming that Avro required a poxmit from the newly formed Coastal Commission to continue its development. The California Supreme Court held that Avco could not be regarded as having perfected a vested right under the subject facts because it had failed to meet tiro traditional vested rights common law rule that the landc-ner hats a vested right only if he has performed substantial wc�k in good faith reliance .upon building permits. That remains the general rule in California. However, the Council should be cautioned that some cases have hinted at another way to establish vested rights, that is, obtaining all discretionary approvals of a public entity with particular concern over the details of the buildings to be constructed. For example, ..f the issue in question is the development of a small shopping center and the developer has gone through development •eview, design review, conditional use permit procedures o.• any like 2 Ai procedures where tht "Very details of the project have been considered and approved by the governmental entity, a devel- oper could argue that the developer has obtained a vested right based upon language in the subject cases. However, again, the general rule adhered to for the most part is the .1 rule announced in Avco, that is, that no vested rights are acquired by a developer until a building permit has been issued -` and the developer has L- ponded a substantial amount of money in reliance on the issuance of building permits. In accordance with the above discussion, it appears clear that if the rock crus:ier project is finally appiived by t,.e County and building permits are obtained and money expended pursuant to those permits by the developer prior to annexation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the developer then will have a vested right to pursue aad will be able to develop anc operate the rock crusher plant. If the rock crus:.ai pla•,t in approved in very specific detail throug:' the pla....ing erocesr. and annexation ensues prior to the issuance of a building permit, the situation will be rather murky as to whether the City then may assert planuinq controls. If the developer has received only abstract discretionary approval and there are no specific plans or details related to the rock crusher plant which have worked their way through the proccos of approval, the developer in all likelihood would be held not to have acquired a vested right to develop and ope -ate the plant. Other complications are inheres,: in the subject Project due to the fact that the land is owned by the Flood Ccntrol District and presumably could be dedicated to the County as County property. If the property remains owned by the Flood Control District, it in our view that the City of Rancho Cucamonga would retain any planning and zoning control over development of the property subject, of course, to the development of vested righteas discussed above. However, if the property is transferred to the County of San Bernardino for whatever reason, the provisions of California Government Code Sections 53090 through 53095 come into play Those sections divest cities and counties from asserting planning and zoning control over property within their jurisdiction owned by other cities or courties. The idea of the subject oxemptions would allow co -equal public operations without giving either the power of veto over activities of the other regardless of the location of tho subject activities. There is a nuance involved even if 3 - . t ,.1.. JLM:djp the COUntyof'San Depardino, acquires title ro the subject Property which later is - annaked to the City of Rancho: Cucamonga. The exempti' on from the City's planning and zoning control referred to abovit only would apply to ac- tivities on,County ;1roperty i4hich carry out County public Purposes. It should,be noted that those Public purpo3ea could be carried out directly by the County or by a I-asee of the County property. A:ccord1%g13, even if the County gained control ovor,•t,,he subject Property and then leased it to the rock crusher developer, the City could assert zoning and Planning control over the development and invite the County OE San Bernardin6 to indicate how the operation of the rock crusher plant could be deemed to Le an impleZ mentation c' public purposes of the County of San Bernardino. I hope that"the above information is useful to the city Council in considering th-s complex project. JLM:djp y_, RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP lyujj2.i.•14•' . � ` � , i'1' `t' •%!.`Y �j N� ^`. �NLy:° • i � ' ° �,'. . ri�� i Gf J" CITY OF Pr RANCHO CUCAMONGA B . t1 2• `; - � iY PROPOSED ANNEXATION £ ' OF SBCFCD LAND } W CITY BOUNDARY °lt ? M� ..• z IJ- 2 Y xo v O O W 1. Y • I�M •OY 4 L o b � � i � t �c. = Y. x+•� a CARYN PLAMNlD i = COMM'INITY o $ Y W i � p 5 i NIONIANO p ; A ENUR yy4yy;��+:, XQ7(71, s �4 f�. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa liininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: POTENTIIL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT SITES i VVtr i �Ti: I. BACKGROUND: At the July.2, 1986, City Council meeting, Staff eas requester -to review a nuabar of sites throughout the City for preliminary analysis for General Plan Amendments. The following report discusses issues and Procedures for considering City - initiated General Plan Amendments at the next hearing cycle in September. The report also provides a brief discussion of each of the sites or land use designations under consideration. At this meeting, the Council will review the preliminary analysis and select which, il' any, of the subject sites it will direct the Planning Cc- mission to consider for land use amendments. II. GENERAL VLLX AMENDMENT PROCEDURES: Accordicg to State law, the r yif —may con, c�u' ui: p t:o four separate hearing cycles per year for the purpose of amending an element of the General Plan The next scheduled Pianning Commission hearing date for General Plan Land Use element amendments will be September 24th, 1986, with the sutaittal deadline for non -City initiated amendments on July 15th. There is no limitation on the number of land use amendments which can be considered on a hearing date. Staff is anticipating several GPA applications from individuals for this cycle. III. SITE DESCRIPTIONS: The sites under consideration fall into two aaa qes. a first are individual sites which have been specifically identified by the City Council for further review. The second are sites for which all parcels within a specific General Plan designation are under consideration. The following briefly describes the sites and their planned and existing land uses. A. INDIVIDUAL SITES (SEE EXHIBIT W): 1. Southeast Corner of Archibald and Church Office ro ems ono ea m es en a 07 ac . Land use: vacant. 5urrounaeU To- ems an south by Medium Residential development, m wr11 1 2 t t %- anti ..,�'ifrlNpyy�y,�':• "hl -rnw -. :� CITT COUNCIL STAFF.REMP.T July 16. Potential General Plan'Amein Page 2 Iment Sites ;X y . � 7'i• 3.5 acres. The site is isolated from other OP or commercial development by residential development. 2. East of Chaffey College, Between Banyan and i�Low R'- RRIden a u ac o cw es en a - u ac : an use: vacant. SUFrurd ng General Plan designations: north - Very Low ( 2 du /ac), south - Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac), east - Flood Control, Nest - Chaffey College, 6S acres. A time extension on a tentative tract wp of S08 condominium units for this site was denied at the June 11, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. The tentative map approval expired on July 14, 1966. 3. South side' of Foothill Blvd. East of ylneyard, w es en a u ac ,, ce roress onr, : an use: vacan presc o0 conver TFF= single family residence). Parcel size: 1.75 acres. The site accesses directly on Foothill Blvd. and 1s bordered on the south, east and west b) !tedium High development. However, the site is included in-the Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan Study currently underway. The interim policies adopted by the City for properties on Foothill discourage land use amendments prior to completion of the Specific Plan. 4. South side of Foothill Blvd., b^.tween Archibald an Ramona; beneral Plan s gna on: aemerc a . Land use: various cam --clal /office structures. This area is currently under consideration under the Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan Study discussed above. B. All Undeveloped Office Professional Sites West of Haven: Th. 'Cuuu a nos re quested oat all o un eveloped Office- :rofesslonal sites west of Haven be considered for land use changes due to concerns regarding the supply of office professional space currently existing in the coonunity. Approximately 9 sr-as would be involved with an estimatld total area of 35 acres (sc9 Exhibit 'D'). Direction should be provided to Staff regard Ng specific sites to be considered for amendment. r` 01 . 3 ?� e Y,+ CITY COUNCIL ,, STAFF'REPCRT••• -,•, f' ,Irn .uly 16. 1966 v;, Potential General Plan Amendment- Sites [r�•r ,+•� +v` '�<'•+ Page 3 ' r C. All Medium Densit Residential Parcels: The Council has Residential range o£ 4-14 ndu /ac oin vorder to eb Corsi tent the Development District designation of 'M' at 8-14 du /ac, q � eliminating the lower end of the range which falls under the Law Medium Residential density of 4-8 du /ac. In order to modify this density on a City wide bask, a revision of the text of the General Plan Land Use Element will be requf.•ed. A revision residential densitiessanyallnMedium Resid�entialilsitess In the t City to 8-14 du /ac. If there are individual sites which are currently designated as Medium which the Council feels should be limited to the 4 -8 du /ac range, individual General Plan Amendments would be required for + sites specified by the Cou�ca to change to the Low Mediue designation, if requested, the Planning Commission can,conslder this issue. IV. DIRECTI01: REQUESTED: The Council is requested to direct Staff as c axn n s should be l+ ' considered by tho Planning Commission at the September 24th meeting. In addition, Staff is requesting input regarding alternative land use designations for those sites selects for consideration. will After receiving this direction, Staff b able to begin preparation of the application materials ,,,.• and /'Otf�i atien of affected property owners. - Rb�fully submitted, Bra ller City tanner B8:LAN :dak - Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Individual Sites Exhibit 'B' - Office Professional Sites G t4. :r. `' a EXHIBIT A Individual Sites 31 f t e t I C• W / o 31 f t e t I to } EXHIBIT B Office Professional Sites N6 � WmxeJ m 1 °1 f 1 EwtA� � 1 _ 1 I F�os�:u� iliOtWY � 1 .� Ss.ceuHS ej W � #1 1 I d +13 NL 1 1 ' Cuuxu� 1 I 1 ; narrH�u y04 #� ab ii9 1 I wte�l Na i i •.- 1 e� ow 3 6 'm o- �, i L: t 10: CI•iY COUNCIL 1. q1•From: Dick Dahl Re: Agenda Item "D -2" General Plan land use designations that I would like to see reviewed f .lr possible change. First: Area imwdiately east and adjacent to Chaffey College, including the southern border of Chaffey College, for possible down zoning and master plan desigr ion. Second: All O.P planned areas vast of Haven; south of Ninth and north .f of (including both sides of) San Bernardino Road, for possible changu in land use to a special conaercial designation with limited uses (such as: restaurants and /or service stations, etc.) or residential. Dick Dahl ']. \' Se..l to 5t ";75'x, :'.�.'sr +'�; ^_ ^:577!i e.s �.`se,;(, �''`r��{ •:r".v �•V t '\+}}n�}�ti< 1�t July I6, 1986 f¢:iWT:r'.. I 7 YA' lit h..t 'v 3 AGODA FOR CUCAXONCA CMIT7 WATU DISTRICT 1. District Water Conservation Program 2. Discussion of City Now Availability (ground water supply) 3. Saver Installation L2 Northam portion of City -,MM1 MMOOVV� -,MM1 s, r� G. July 16. 1986 70: CITY COUNCIL From. Dick Dahl Re: Agenda Item `DI-q I would like to tee added to the agenda the following items: A. Feasibility of utilizing reclaimed water for parks, city landscapeing and/or private industrial landsccpe maintenance. B. Water districts long range plans for serving our expanding City (an overview). C What can the City do to aid in an overall conscrvation pro- graa: in cooperation with the Water Oistrict. Dick Dahl i 9 Y� ORDINANCE NO. �9 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AMEWING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE SECTION 17.04,070 - TEMPORARY LASES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ranchn Cucamonga, California Loes ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a Public hearing hold in the time and manner prescribed by law, recw=nds the Amendment to Section 17.04,070 "Temporary Uses•, of the Development Code as hereinafter described, and this City council has held a public hearing prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B That this ue"lopment Code Amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C That thii Amenti tot is consistent with the objectives of the Development Cade. U. That this Amendment to the Development Code will have no significant unvi*cnnental impact as provided in the Negative Ddcisration file' herein. SECTION 21 That Section 17.04.070 *Temporary Uses" is hereby amended to rea as ollows: Section 17.04,070 -C to read as follows: 7. Model domes. Model homes may be used as offices solely or a rst sale of t,%zes within a recorded tract subject to the following co,,itions: (a) The sales office may be located in a garage, trailer or dwelling. eW 1 Tl�y� F t' r CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE OCA 86 -02 Page 2 (b) Approval shall be for a two -year period, at which time the sales office use shall be terminated and the stricture restored back to its orlgnal condition. Extensions may be granted by the City Planner in one year increments up to a maximum of four (4) years or until ninety (90) percent of the development is sold; whichever is less. ic) A cash', deposit, letter of credit, or any security determined satisfactory to the City shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in an amount to be set by Council Resolution, to ensure the restoration or revoval of the structure. (d) The sales office is to be used only for transactions Involving the sale, rent, or lease of lots and /or structures within the tract in which the sales office is located, contiguous tracts, or a planned coemunity. However, the Planning Cormission may consider ofF -site model hate sales offices subject to the granting of a Conditinncl Use Permit (See 'Section 17.04.070 -c-a). (e) Failure to terminate sales office and restore structure or failure to apply for an extension on or before the expiration date will result In forfeiture of the cash deposit, a halt to further coastructlon or inspection activity on the protect site, and enforc.ment action to ensure restoration of structurL (f) Street improvements and teporary off- street parking at a rate of two (2) spaces per model shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner prior to commencement of sales activities or the display of model homes. (g) All fences proposed in conjunction wit!, the model homes and sales office shall be %cated out;ide of the public right -of- way.,; (h) Flags, pennants, or other on -site advertising shall be regulated pursuant to the Sign : t :i Regulations of the lAmicipal Code. „ > „„ r. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE OCA 86 -02 Page 3 (i) Use of signs shall require submission of a sign permit application for review and approval by tha Plamning Division prior to installation. 8. Off -Site !idol Homes. A model hums sales office, whin not of cat w t a one of the three circumstances identified In Section 17.04.070- C -7(d), is to be considered as an off -site model home sales office. Off -site model home sales offices may only be permitted subiect o the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the r,anning Commissio. as perscribed in Section 17.04.030, rnd in conforrince with the following criteria. (a) A sales office within the model home complex may only be located within the dwelling itself, or within the garage. Trailers, modulars, or any similar temporary structure, shall not be permitted. (b) A cash deposit, the amount to be determined by the City Planner, will be required upon issuance of the Conditional Use Permit to insure restorat;nn of the model hone sales office to Its Intended ultimate configuration. (c) Off- street parking within a paved lot or some other form of parking determined as acceptable by the Planning Commission shall be provided at the ratio of 2 spaces for every model home and shall be located within the limits of the mode; home sales office complex. The provision of such parking is a necessary prerequisite for the granting of this permit, and its deve4opment shall be completed prior to the commencement of activities or display of mWel homes. (d) The hours of operation that the model home sales office may be opened to the public for business shall be limited to between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (e) All fences proposed to conjunction with the model home sales office shall be located outside of the public right- of -wdy. m Ate. a�t,y a i n s ' 4 c t P� v 9 ••v' CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE OCA 86 -02 Page 4 (f) If proposed, adequate on -site lighting shall be provided to insure a safe and secure environment, while at the sane time being designed and placed in such a manner as to Prevent stray light or glare from becoming a nuisance factor for adjacent properties. The lighting design employed should be of a low - level type of system, 1.e., Malibu stT T gi g ing. A detailed lighting plan shall ha submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to the commencement of activities or display of model homes. (g) Tine approval of this permit shall be for a one - year period, at which time the model home /sales office use shall be terminated and the • structure(s) restored back to its (their), oricinal condition. Tlcst extensions may be grnnted by the Planning Commission up to a maxlnxcm of one -year, for until 90% of the davelopmene is sold, whichever is less. Request for time extensions must be received by the Planning Division at lea;:t 30 days prior to the date of expiration. Any requests for extension of this Conditional Use Permit beyond the two years would require the application of a new Conditional Use Permit. Irrespective of the above, any model hone sales office in existence as a combination of as first an on- site use, than as an off -site use, shall be ii, existence an aggregate total time not to exceed three years. (h) All model hu+o lots shall be fully landscaped including, but not limited 'to, a permanent, underground irrigation system, specis.an size trees, and the use of shrubbery, ground cover, and lawn to combination to produce a pleasing and aesthetic environment compatible with the surrounding established neighborhood. (i) Before approving a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission shall make the necessary mandatory findings as prescribed in Section 17.04.030 -E, plus the fallowing additional findings: • i + CiTY COUNCIL ORDINANCE OCA 86 -02 Page 5 _ 1. That the , model' home sales office 1s " compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood, and that its location will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare,' or result in any :significant adverse impacts for any residents withir e the surrounding established neighborhood, _ 2. That the location of the model ho—e sales Office has sufficient access to a primary circulation route (collector, secondary, or arterial) so that any additional traffic generated as a result of this project will not have dn,y significant impact for the surrounding development. To insure that , any traffic impacts associated with the establishment of a model home sales office are minimlzed, it will be required that concurrent with any application for a Conditioanl Use Permit for an off -site model home sales office, that the applicant will also include a traffic study to be prepared by a certified traffic engineer detailing all potential traffic impacts expected to result from the project, and proposing any required mitigation measures that would be necessary to . -educe any traffic impacts to the surrounding established neighborhood. 3. That sufficient on -site, off - street parking is available so that any additional parking ' demand generated as a result of this project would not have any significant adverse impacts for the surrounding development. 4. That the individual elements of the model homes sales office, i,e., lighting, signing, fencing, hours of operation, etc., are deeigned in a collective, coordinated manner to ensure a stfe, secure, and aesthetic environment, sensitive to and compatible with the surrounding development. As a minimum, the Planning, Commisslon shall determine that the ' proposed site is developed consistent with the landscaping requirements per Section , �. 1 17.04.0;0 -C-B(h , :, , , I ' CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE 00 6u -02 Page 6 S. Th,t `the model home sales office 1s to be of a temporary, short -term nature; short term is &fined as having a,life expectancy not to excel two years. - 1, Trailer coaches or mobile homes on active construction sites OF use as a temporary living quarters for security personnel, or temporary residence of the subject property owner. The following restrictions shall apply: (a) The City Planner may approve a temporary trailer for the duration of the construction project nr for a specified period, but to no event for more t,:in two (2) years. if exceptional circumstances exlsi, a one (1) year extension may be granted, provided that the building permit for the first permanent dwelling or structure on the same site has also been extended. (b) Inst,ilation of trailer coaches may occur only after a valid bu+lding permit has been issued by the City Building and Safety Division. (c) Trailer coaches permitted pursuant to this section shall not exceed a maximum gross square footage of six hundred fifty (650) square feet in size (tongue not included). (d) The trailer coach most have a valid California vehicle license and shall provide evidence of State Division of Housing approval as prescribed in the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. A recreational vehicle being defined as a motorhome, travel trailer, truck camper or camping trailer, kith or without motor power, shall not be permitted pursuant to this section. (e) 4te temporary trailer coach installation must meet all requirements and regulations of the C.lunty Department of Environmental Health Services and the City Building and Safety Division. (f) Any permit issued pursuant to this section in conjunction with a construction project shall become invalid upon cancellation or completion of the building permit for which this use has been approved, or the expiration of the tima ^)r which the approval has been granted. a 3a CITY COUNCIL ORDINXICE r DCA 86 -07 Page 7 x 10. Other uses and activities similar to the above as deemed appropriate by the City Planner. At that time, trailers shall be removed fran the site. ; 11. Te° orar Office ►bdules. The use of temporary structures, suc° as tra ers or pre- fabricated structures for use as interim offices, may be considered in any district subject to the approval of a Cond°tional Use Permit and the regulations stated with Section 11.10.30 -F -4 L r � ____ -� • r 7a ..Rite .n„ _ • v�RYq'L't_.{ 0 a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION REVOKING Z'ONDTTIOAR -DSO see ng a n e enera industrial u area 3), located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APN: 209 - 031 -74. I. BACKGROUND: o On August 8, 1984, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 84 -14 with a twelve -month review period. o On October 9, 1985, the Planning Commission conducted a twelve -month review of Conditional Uso Permit 84 -14 to determine whether the use operation was consistent with the Conditions of Approval and applicable City codes. It was determined that the applicant had yet to meet the Foothill Fire District requirements. The Commission granted the applicant 90 days to comply with the Fire District requirements. o On March 26, 1986, the Planning Commission determined that there was sufficient evidence to warrant a full examination to consiacr revocation and set a public hearing for the April 23, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. o At the May 14, 1986, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission revoked CUP 84 -14, based on the applicant failing to comply with the Foothill Fire District requirements to install fire alarms and applicable fire safety equipment (see attached Resolution No. 86 -52). Copies of the staff reports and minutes are attached for your consideration. a a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT July 16, 1986 CUP 84 -14 - Veterans of Foreign Nara Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: To date, the applicant has not received approval of a ii a safety system for the VFW meeting hall from the Foothill Fire District. However, the Fire District has recently (613186) received the appropriate system plans for review and approval. According to Lloyd Almand of the Foothill Fire District, minor corrections to the plans are needed prior to approval. Once these ' ?•. olmns are approved, the system must be installed end inspected by i the Fire District. It is anticipated that approval of the plans, Installation, and final inspection will take place between the time this report is written and this City Council coating. The most current s_utus of the above process will be presented by the Foothill Fire District to the Council during the presentation of r this report. lil. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council conduct a hear n9 o rev ew the applicant's request. If the fire safety system has been installed to the satisfaction of the Fire District, it is recommended that the appeal be upheld. However, if the fire safety system has not been completed, it is recommended that the appeal be denied. R c to sutmitt , D eman S nior Planner DC:DP:dak Attachments: Letter of Appeal P.C. Minutes d Staff Report for May 14, 1986 ? Resolution 86-52 Foothill Fire District Correspondence 4 i� 1� 1] e.l•T�i,FsSI, Veterans of Foreign Were of the Ueltel States Uwe-AN" nemm l \ POST 8600 P.a. jai 9N 711 IRRUSIRIA6 SAKE May 20. 1986 Poerd of City Commissioners City Of Rancho Cucamonga 9161 Boas Line Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Gentlemen. On Wednesday. May 19. 1986, your Clty Planning Commiaslon consisting of Commissionura Barker. Chltloa. Ramplo and Stout sot. Ono Of the Rosa on their agenda was - -J. REVOCATION QE CONDITIONAL UE PERMIT 86 -14 - VFW'. The result was the approval Of the item. We the memharo of Uplano- Rancho Cucamonga VFW Post 8G80. feel that there was too much misinformation. misunderstanding and lack of proper communication cthe melority of It on our part). We request an appeal of the Planning Commisalon's decision and w., .d approclato a hearing at your convenience. Our chock in the aaount of 0126 00 for the appeal feo Is enclosed Yours..,. very � truly,�,,J Encl. Mathias M. Hogue Post Commander ATTEST: , Borneo • �R. 6ernes ' Post Adjutant- Quarternastor r .. ?7 i t tint,• r. :�� *. A , Ft'OnHU FIRE PROTECTION DISMCP P. o. sor 35 6623 Am thyvt street Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 01701 (114) 087.2633 SM1HARY OF MEETING WITH OUR FIRE PROTECTION CONSULTANT 7 -15 -86 Foothill Fire District was asked by the Data -Com company to give a tentative approval of the fire alarm system without full compliance with the fire protection consultant's report dated Juno 27, 1986. Based upon the advice of our consultant and the direction given by Fire Marshal Almand, Foothill Fire District will not conduct any inspections or tests of the fire alarm system at the VFW until the f- llowing is done: .. An audibility test must be conducted by the alarm com- pany during a live function, such as a dance. That is the only way we will be able to determine if the nvstem design is aufflcient to warn people over the noise of a band and a crowA of people. 2. The alarm company must furnish test data to the fire district The alarm design must be a minimum of 10 decibels above the test data maximum. 3. The fire alarm plans must be resubmitted for recheck to determine all other uutstanding items have been corrected. It is still the position o: Foothill Fire District that the installation of the fire alarm will not mitigate all other fire and life safety questions conFerning the suitability of the VFW to occupy this building.' It is the recommendation of Foothill Fire District that any final decision regarding the suitability of the VFW to occupy thin building be postponed until we know what the VFW intends to do about all fire and life safety concerns we have expressed. We respectfully request that the Council wait until their next meeting to make a determination because of the problems we are experiencing with just the fire alarm system. Respectfully Submitted, . o L Susan D. Wolfs DRAFT EXCERPT - PLANNING C0144ISSION MINUTES - MAY 14, 1986 J. REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -14 - VFW - i meeting hall serving Tohooc T— everages ,n an existing builoi ng w h a lease space of 5000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) Category, located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APR 209- 031 -74. (Continued from April 23, 1986 meeting) Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Chief Lloyd Almond, Foothill Fire District, stated that it was the Fire District's position that it was not in the best interest in the life mid safety of citizens to allow the VFW to continue its use of the building due to noncompllat. -a of conditions. Susan Wolfe, Footnill Fire District, advised that the Fire District has not received a fire alarm plan and the system has not been Installed, despite assurances by the VFW that they intend to comply with the condition as required. Chairman Stout stated that at the last hearing the applicant indicated that they had been supplied with 'nsufficient information relative to the type of plan required by the Fire District. Ms. Wolfe replied that the Fire District mailed a certified letter to Matt Hogue, Commander os VFW Post 8680, on September 6, 1985. A copy of the letter was provided to the Commission for their review, Ms. Wolfe pointed out that this rt,cer contained the fire alarm requirement found in the fire code. Gene Barnes, resresenting the VFW, stated that they received the letter from the Fire Cistrict, but were not sure what needed to be included in the plan. Further, tr.at the VFW was willing to comply with conditions of approval, but needed further Information regarding the alarm plan. He indicated that one of the members was an electrician and he had purchased the alarm equipment. Commissioner Rempel stated that any alarm company would be able to draw up the required plans and suggested that the applicant should contact one of then, not simply use: an electrician who is not familiar with fire code requirments. Chief Almond, Foothill Fire District, stated that the Fire District had been in contact several times with the VFW and had informed them what the plans must contain in order to meet the conditirns of approval. Each time, the VFW had assured the Fire District that they fully intended t, •ide the plan as required. He further stated that Commissioner Rempel was correct in that any fire alarm comoarty would be able to draw the plans specified, which had been suggested to the applicant. However, the Fire District could not endorse and, one company and the Fire District was not in the business of drawing up fire system plans. �181 .r; S I ,T x• ,x 'i w t I ri- Y ' L There were no further coamwits, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barter did n'a% think the use should be allowed to continue until it meets the Fire District's conditions of approval. He suggested that a new condition be added to tense operations with a fixed date for compliance`of conditions. Commissioner Chitiea was concerned with granting a continuance because of' the safety factor for people using the building. She could not support a continuance to allow operations dno stated that the applicant had been given t, an opportunity since the last meeting to comply, but did not elect td do so. ` She felt it was necessary for the building to be brought up to Fire District a'! standards before any further use would be allowed; therefore, was in favor of revoking the Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Rempr,l asked if the applicant brought the building up to code, could they reappl/ for a Conditional Use Permit. Ralph Hanson, Assistant City Attorney, replied that the applicant could reapply for a ronditional Ute Permit once all conditions have been met. Motion: Mo-ed by Chitiea, seconded by ReaW. to revoke Conditional Use Permit 84-14, VFW. Motion carried by the following vote: • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEt, BARKER, STOUT N:ES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIOEERS: MCNIEI - carried r w r , w S I ,T x• ,x 'i w t I L P.; 7' �.r CITY OF RANCHO CULONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 14, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner "in SUBJECT: REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -14 - VETERANS OF meet ng a I sery ng s co o c averages n an exT-sfrng building with a lease space of 5000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APN 209- 031 -74. I. BACKGROUND: On April 23, 1986, the Planning Commission requested Mat representative of the Foothill Fire District make a presentation at the next Planning Commission meeting, Wednesday, May 14, 1986, with regards to the current status of the VFW facility application per the Fire District's requireents. 11. ANALYSIS: Staff has contacted the Foothill Fire District who agree -to have 3 representative at the May 14th meeting available to answer questions. The applicants of the VFW have also contacted the Fire District following the April 23, 1966 Planning Commission meeting, for further direction and clarification of the Fire District's requirements. ,ttached for your information are copies of the correspondence from the Fire District to VFW identifying th•e necessary corrections. It is staff's understanding, at the time this report was written, that the applicant has yet to mret the Foothill Fire Gistri•:t's requirements. Should the appl• cant meet the Fire District's requirements after this report is f;aaled and , iur w "a Planning Comission meeting, staff will present an upiate as to the status of this project. How:ver, if there are issue, still urresotved, a representation of t Fire District will bit available to answer questions at the meeting. 111. RECOMMENDATION: Upon consideration of the Foothill Fire District's Presentee on, staff recommends that Lne Planning Commission revolked Conditional Use Permit 84 -:4 through adcption of the attached Resolution if the fire alarns have not been installed and approved by tie Fire-61strict prior to this hearing. ID 10 ITEM J U-7 �L .. y t1 ai 1 i�J PLANNING COMIISSION j/''7F REPORT REVOCATION OF CUP 84l•�.- Vrd May 14, 1986 Page 2 Respettf ully • tted ra Buller City Planner R6:OP :ko Attachments: Fire O,strict Correspondence April 23, 1986 Staff Report _ Original Resolution i Conditions of Approval Resolution of-Revocation a. r. � C RVSOLt'fION N0. 86 -52 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA REVOCATIA; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -14, A MEETING HALL SERVING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN AN EXISTING BUILDING WITH A LEASE SPACIi OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET Oil 3 41 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT CITYAOFA RANCHO LOCATED CUCX#)NGA AI INDUSTRIAL MAK MAKING IFINDDINGS INTSUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals. (I) VETERANS OF rORE1GN TARS (VFW) filed an apPlicaticn for the toResolctlon. e Permit Hereinafterin his Resolution. described e of t on. thesubj ct Conditional his use Permit requtst is referred to as "the CUP-. (it) On August 8, 1984, tae Planning Commission approved the CUP with a 12 -month review period. On Octuber 9, 1985, the Commission conducted a 12-month review of the CUP to determine the use operation consistent with t'ie conditions of approval and granted a 90 -day compliance review period. On March 26, 1986, thu Planning Commission determined that there was sufficient evidence to warrant a full examination or revocation and set a public hearing date for April 23, 1986, On April 23, 1986, the Commission held a public hearing to consider revocation of the CUP and continued the public hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting. Thereafter, on May 14, 1986, the Commission continued a public heraing to consider revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution havo occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it 1: found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Cormiission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. during the sooveareFerenced A gsubstantial t 8, 1984 er1Octpresented ber 9. e1985. MarchC266,,11986,� April 23, 1r -86, and May 14, 1936 Planning Commission meetings, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: General Plan regardinger the o compliance withcithey FoothillnsFire Protection District's fire safety requirements; b. The conditions of approval, east stated in Resolution in that f �t conform a�larms have not beer, installed as required by State Fire Marshall regulatlons•v Y( � sr i PLANNING COMMISsf' RESOLOTION C May 14, i9E6 'aa CUP 84.14 - VFW Page 2 C. The operation of the VFW facility could have a significant Impact on the environment by exposing the members of the VFW organization and persons and properties immediately adjacent to the subject site to fire hazards. 3. Based upno the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced Planning Commission meetings and upon specific findings of fact set forth in 481" end 082" of this Resolution above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The oparation of the VFW facility is not consistent w:th the General Plan; b. The operation of the VFW fdcility is not consistent to the conditions of approval. C. The operation of the VFW facility may cause substantial env'ronmental damage. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in this Resolution, this Commission hereby revokes Conditional Use Permit 84 -14. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NAY, 1986. COMMISSION 07 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Hay, 1986, by tre following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, CH!TIEA, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCHe EL m /LI yyVR �q �P v '�L ®QII.�:UILLLL 11 i e PROTECTION � \J t.0 BOX 75. 6673 AMYTHTSf S7 .BANGYO f.U(AMONGA 91701 PII) 987.7575 January 6, 1986 w' , Mr. Matt Hogue, Commander Veterans of Foreign Hors, Post 8680 8757 Industrial Lone Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hogue: r An anonymous complaint regrading the VFW occupc'ncy was tuned in to the Fire Prevention Bureau. It specifically charges that: L Loose and toped wires area// through the cei/In;9 In the bar area. 3. There Is o J• canon shell, with o live explosive head, behind toe bar. 3. There ore no emergency lights, nor smoke detectors. The first two Items are a camp /ate surprise to me and w41 rcgjlre me to make an on-slte Inspection. If the condltlans ore truly as we have been :old, the VFW must correct this sltuOdca Immediately. The third Item sounds like something to do with a fire afore, system. You and I earlier discussed what the code required In the way Of fire alarm. According to the Uniform Fire Code, o manually operated fire o/a m system Is required In the VFW. This would exclude the ose of smoke detectors. According to my letter of September 6, 1985, 1 :eat you a copy of the fire alarm reculrements found In the Pre code. We are still walting to receive pre alarm plans. You ore requested to do the following; L Send us a fetter within pve business days slating your Intentions to Install On approved ffre alarm system. The fire alarm system Is still required for the VFW even though you have reduced the occupant /oat, of the larger room bN" u 300 persons. The lost time I requested this you verbally contact -d Fire Marshal Ahnand; 1 belleve your orgonisolton was looking far o new location. / must have a decision from you now. Z Within 30 calendar days submit two sets of plons to the pre deportment for approval, prior tolnstallation of the fhe alarm system. /�Y .s .Y \j §r4�ra. s..gk ,V f. j4 C Mr. Molt Hogue, Commander January 6. 1986 Page Two Follure to comply with this letter will leave us no choice but to advise the planning' deportment to revoke CUP 84-14. Thank you for your complete cooperation. , Sincerely, n3•c�,t Susan D. Wol /e Fire Prevention Inspector SDVJIss cc.* Dino Patrino, Planning Division 0 /e)"S- �j Y: 0 i °. Page 2 i l• ; :CZTS /EXIT CORRIDORS •• I- X Exit signs shall be posted above required exit doors as noted, and illuminated at any time the building is occupied. Light inuensity of exit signs shall be not Less than one footcandle at floor level. Exit sign colors shall contrast with the walls, with letters not less than 3/41 wide and 6• high. 2._ All exit signs shall be on circuits which shall be separate _rom all other circuits in the building and independently controlled. 3.X Exit door hardware shall be approved panic type and installed as noted on plans. State Fire Marshal listing numbers for panic�hard- ware shall be submitted to this department prior to installation. 4. X Exit corridor doors shall be State Fire Marshal listed and shall include automatic door closing devices. 5.X Vertical exit corridor wall finish shall meet Class I flame spread ratings. Horizontal exit corridor wall finish shall meet Class II flame spread ratings. D_CORATIVE 11ATERIAL 1. yt All drapes, hangings, curtains, drops and•other decorative material that would tend to increase the fire and panic hazard shall be made from material which is not flammable or uhall be treated by means of a flame retardant solution or process approved by this department. 2. X All interior wall finish shall neat Class III flame spread ratings. AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPSENT 1. t3_ Any air conditioning ducting penetrating an exit corridor shall have a State Fire Marshal listed and approved fire damper installed. Dampers shall operate by products of combustion devices. State Fite Marshal listing numbers shall be submitted to this department prior to installation. FIRE DEPARTETNT ACCESS l._ Fire line(s), cul- de- sac(s), hammorhead(s) or turn - around(s) shall be constructed as noted on plans (see attached). EMERGENCY LIGHTING 1. x If the building is subject to occupancy during night time hours, '•� e emergency US%4 irg shall be installed for all areas of the building. Plans and upecificattions shall be submittad to this department for approval prior to installation. 2._ Emergency l.ghtirg shall be installed fcr all areas of the building. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to this department for ' approval prior to installation. /06 f,. .� s, Page 1- ROOM CAPACITIES 1• X Room capacities have been calculated not to exceed the following. ,- An occupant load sign, which shall be approved by this department, shall be posted in subject room near an exit. LOCATION MAXIMUM PERSONS MAIL: HALL DANCING /DINING 267/125 SECOND HALL DRINKING 49 PLAN RESUSMITTALS 1._ Resubmit copies of plan pages as indicat_d below, and all other pages �.; as necessary. - 6 � OTHER _IJ UUW dt1& !;• a inbmi -tAn 6yx11" reduction of the site plan for this department% .(mrij'a Permanent files. Bon - - 7- 19 -_{- REMARKS: o � r According to the revised occupant load, this is an A -3 occupancy, which moans it can share a commbn call with the occupancy to the , - u1 east, which is a D -2. , o DN oN lbNDtlto/di •�! .y,p� �01JOf IAICWOP. n% �'n . •� •."' �4.•tF!f y {q:t�i:'xr.�� � ., :: �-n,� � .i Y.:',:1. t ' , -• r `��f.�l'.+�.u.L�.(�t, - •r- ':'la. •�::�.,'.Y�M+d1.� ' �: {.fQ7•Y.,iir..'1 °w'7".l'' :r� >; , «.y�:r'.'. .� ?.. .. (.L rn .� o T1`.rce, cr .............. �y FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT `' .. PLAN CHECK REPORT ! .� OCCUPA,VCY NAME: Upland - Rancho Cucamonga VFW PosC. 8 \680 CHECKED BY: S.D.Wolfe ADDRESS: 8751 Industrial Lane _ __DATE CHECKED: 072g8q Items noted below are to be accomplished /corrected prior to issuance of permit. Corrections are to be resubmitted to this department for review FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS 1, X Fire extinguisher (s) will be required. The size(s), type(s), number and location(s) will be determined by this departnent. Installation is the responsibility of the owner /occupant and required prior to occupancy (see attached). 2._ An automatic fire extinguishing system is required. Building construc- tion plans shall have an approval stamp from a licensed structural engineer. Plans shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and approved by this depazum nt and the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to installation or issuance of a permit. 3•_ The automatic fire ,prinkler system, facluding all controls, shall be electronically supervised, with signals terminating at the fire department dispatching facilities. The proposed method of suparvis Son shall be submitted with the fire sprinklor design. Approvals will be required prior to installation. q. X An automatic fire extinguishing system shall be installed for the cooking area. Plans shall be submitted to and approved by this department prior to installation. An approved hood and duct system shall be installed (see attached). S•_ Approved firo hydrant(s) are required (see attach3d) . Flans shall be submitted to and approved by this department prior to installation. 6._ An approved, supervised smoko detection system ie required. Plans shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. A copy of the sorvice contract shall be provided for fire department files. 7._ Temporary fire protection facilities will be required during building construction. The contractor and /or developer shall contact this department for specific requirements prior to commencing construction. FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS 1. X Fire flow shall be a minimum of 2500 gpm, at s minimum residual pressure of 20 psi, for a duration of 2_ hours Celculationa developed by a civil engineer or the Cucamonga County Water District, substantiating that the fire flow will be provided, shall be submitted to this department prior to plan approval. 2._ Fire flow has been previously provided. r 1 �D S Buslnas ha v w - �' 7lstrf ct Street ACdr Il . Date. eA ne ana UlArle -- NO�ICE OF VIOLATION cap, UBLIc ASSEMBLY At A recent fire and life safety Inspection by tt1s deD +runt, you- prmises were fu:.nd to Ire correction of the ltees Inected below. YN OK KA VI01A110.N 1 (I k () provide and wfntain adequate lighting at d) tins so all persors can readily find, distinguish, and use ways of egress. 2. O ((.) ( I provide and Install approved • exit slgn(s) at the following locstlon(s): 7. O ( I ( ) provide and Install + roved• ewrgenCy lighting at the fol liming location(s): A. —�— Comme.t4B. ys._�d2et QtM^fMi): C. a. O O (LK fixed gutociatic fin extinguishing system- sha be provid.I and /or wfntatned as follows: S. (tom ( ) Fin ext/ngufseeex shall be provided and /or nlnt+ired a follows: A • Install B • Service C • Relocate 0 • Repair TYPE NEED LOCATION A 6. O O ( Autooetic sprinkler systea tested Deficiencies requiring cornctlto: . T• ( ) ( ) (-K In +larn systell tested date. Deficiencies requiring correction: prorlde to prow Install 490 panic hardware- upon the following doors (existing locks upon these be n :veal: 1_ of approved flaw retardant trcatcant of the following ltM or (a on!tons (fatTun ite 1F n Mrshai certification will Suit in our testing of u,;, 'js) et owner's 1"isary)) 1 / / / lad Pagee 2 of 2 Pages `��\LI f �' tuslness t•- &rslness VA Dc HA _ VIOLAT101 10. Y) ( ) ( ) Provide And mintata elec:rlcal.wlrfna and +.. Ilan ti.�lll 12.1)( -fO lr� requiring Provide and min�in std ape In a safe r{nnej 0eflnl ctes requiring car etlon:{LprnItAl2 Install occupant tad signs as directed iletters and numbers minitAxt la high on contrasting . 7 � _ Fire lanes 'Fell De aalnA/rld unoburucted and Posted with an approved sign. Sign specifications prodded by 'Fall 'a Olstrlct. 14. ( ) ('t-'1" t /') Address risible. Bweers afnlam l• high on contrasting background. is. ( ) t�7c 1 Complete APPlicatlts(s) for Pnsttts) for the Following: A. e._ C. 16. O O V/ Items referred by Fire District to other agencies for Joint follow -up, enhrcteent, etc c so faotnate• Specifications flntl ons for appliances. +PPYr n +noes. Iocking ew;chtnlfos, plain qq and wiring required by this official -- node. Beall be sutaltted W Fin O1et•ICt /pr approot rlor to Installati'n. A scale diagram.wfll F. prubabl E required. CORRLMONS SHALL BE �ADE IPiMEDIATELY r+A relnipectfon to detenlne coeP1Ann will be conducted rn,r�r •st �CI.F \� O�%. QQP/%I .barring a fire department emergency. If you have any proeloat v gums om, v ew con ac a un en ne r cr toto r _refnspection date 9 BAticA Oellvered to:�C�`J� / (Company Reprefentatly gnatun) tt FIRE DISTRICT Box is Cucamonga. CA 91101 967.2575 TI011: ..� - Fin Pravaatlon Bureau - Cc"QY RePnsantative ><�= Ile) Yef'tii ��., i.�a',' •ri ` �'1"�;�4 t y -Ta" �.1 r,rr.'L, ` o-2' Irne -Rare1�l _ District street addreff- r9�•-�5� j l�lt is •p Date K1V% NObICE OF VIOLATION UBLIC ASSEMBLY ' At a nheck fire and Ifle safety tnspectfon by this de ertaent, r v Item checae0 be.ow. D your prcoffes w+rc found to "quire correction of ✓..e YR OK RA ` —^ Y;OUTIOR I I Provfde and m.fatafn adequate lighting at UI ttwf so all parpns can readily find, dfstfrgulsh, and use ways of egress. 2 O P'7 (1 Provide and install approved- exit sign($) at the following Iouttun(s): A'— , 7• i I ( () provide and install approved. eargency lighting at the following location(s): 1• ( 1 ( 1 (Lim tngul$hfng system• shaft be provided 8m/or m i,le, o, as follows: _1 .atu; OYro • eV .m I) ( ) Fire ezttnqulshtrs shall to provided and & - maintained as :allows: A •Install 6 - Schice 6 - Rarct.a p -. Repair TYPE ",ED / (IDCATI —OR ' a a rn n n 12t LU rX tiJ 0—TI-9—c- y sprinkler tested date. Deficiencies requfring correction[ fire atarn $Ysten tested _ data. Deftcfencias requiring onlctfon: 6•L�O O provide and Install - a0proved pant, hardware• upon the following noon leafstfng locks upon tMSa rs shall be rriorr"'p- .n I• Y7 O O Provide proof of �ap�ro_ved flaw retardant treatment of the following item or daCantlons (faflue to provide State ifn 14rsh:; Urtlffcation will result in our to of sor %c) at freer•. eatvmse. n .1......1. rY tf rfl't(.f t� of 2 Pages Bua :rvss Ram i . ���' Y""•• Business Adrsss Cy,�q�t1,J- Iglgw}.l!�,' VIOLATION ) Y K XA ( ) ( ) Provide and m ^ +In slat rfcal �I; •nd appliances 1nD �sa es "V -'ti 9es•- rcon11f7.L__ correction: VV T ml cJw1A 9 CAM* Provide and "main storage in a safe canner. Deficiencies requiring correction: Provide and t 11 occupant to d sign s d rest Letts scan num on olntaa 1• big!. Pn contrasting beckground): a9 C g - (rT (; fin lines shall De sa Maimed u.bitruccet and posted with an aoo^�rea sign. sign tpecf /rattans provided by Fire District. ( (�) Address risible Numbers minim, )' high an contrasting DackgrounA. (i4) Com I to ApplitattW(s) for Perelt(tt)) for the following: r� A. l �r n. ^— CA�l•"' 60 /k O Ny In O(/Item referred by Fin District to ether agencies for joint folio --up, e^foroerent, etc.: S. C. Specifications for appliances, aprurtenantes, baking UsCnattane Dtotn9 and wiring required by %III offlcal" notice shell be sutmitted to Sin DisLrlct for approval ro iar to Installation. A scale d7a9ree N11 probabiyR—required CORRECTIONS SHALL BE �)QDEIIMMEDIATELY _ determine compliance -111 M condated o _ Ms(„ jest 14r�S : ooPm artment epergtncy- If you have any problTes or 4uest ens. p eta cpnaci TY�L{f /�•'n,]a1n-'s-^9wne pr or o e Signed�(,fQ(� 7' C, ''' r par eDnsan.a r . trJ Notice Delivers! to•��� lCampany Wipresaea .n Stgnnun) FINE DISTRICT FAanga, CA 91101 3 TIM - Fin Prevention Burns - Company Repravatstiva r i✓is• 0 �� 2,4f 'Z pages y�y "t • s L�,• C - Business Name Cyr 1 IILUh• Business Adrefs L '1 YN Dl` NA VIOLATION 'g Iky ( ) 1 ) corrects r and w mein bleb r1c•I whiny tnd apDibpc -Q y, a St /e eae)ncY1 A;:c(eptdle{ repnf�iny- - t on• lrinq a- A.� 20 nT_Llnnl/ 'iP -t— QLl! Provide and maintain storage In a Safe a:nner. Deficiencies rop•rdring correction: Prorlde an: occupant To d sign s d ct s a f ers nfnten high on .r contrasting Un _ Fire •memo fMlt De a rata: +sd unoostrvcttd and sifted will. an approved Sign. Sign Specifications �� provtded by Fire District. I (y (( ) Address visible. Numbers aintrmm, 1- Mgr on contrasting back9trund. y ) (YJ O Cpaplste ADplfcatlon(s) for�tPernit(s) ror the Iolloring: ) V Items reforms by Fire District to other agencies tar Joint fat low -up, a +fomewnt, ate, f _ _ ete: Specifications for appliances, appw'tenancas, locking mechanisms. pfy.nv and Wring reyulred by this official In notice shell be submitted to Fin Of trlct for apProral Prior to Insui Asian. A Stale diagram w1i1 Probably�e repwlred. CORRECTIONS SHALL BE MADE D�E,IIMMEDIATEELY �'/ I- 1DpcLlcn to detsmine compliance will be conducted oq s:,& - l5 17r�S O''l/C�1�m , M9 t fire depe -toent esergenoy. If you mare any pnbltms or pbes one., ease contact a un ers gnarl prior to (Tip pectlon date. Signed- ) r per in epraaenta • gctice Milvered to: C , (company Represents a Signaturo) Riot FIRE DISTRICT 1, Rot OS ho Cucamonga, CA 91701 ` I)t}BT4575 'SDTION:• Ali-- Fin Prevention Bureau ;r• ClT Company Representative ( # r, ...egg AN,�. rap r- • .J /- ' ll-OQ'��1111 �17'L' C PRO'T'ECTTOPy PIS'T'RIc7i P O BOX 35 . 6673 AMETHYST 5T . RANC40 CUCAMONGA 91701 014; 987.7535 September 6, 1985 Mr. Matt Hogue, rocmnander Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 8f80 8751 Industrial Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. hogue: As a result of a reinspection conducted September 5 to check compliance with a NOtile of Violation dated August 23, 1985, I am left no choice but to write you this letter of warning. Most of the violaticns noted in August were not corrected. This fact is jeopardizing your Conditional Use Pe=it by allowing your occupancy to continue to operate in an unsafe manner. I must also advise you it has come to my attention your facility is required to have a fire alarm system in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code, Appendix III -c. I have enclosed a copy of the alarm description. I have explained to _is Fire Marshal this is the first time you have been told about hav!ng a fire alarm. He has directed the following shall apply to the VF11 occupancy: 1. Within five busirnas days of receipt of this letter, you must info= us in writing if you intend to install the fire alarm system. 2. If you do not choose to comply with the fire alarm requirements, the Fire Marshal will order the largo assembly room to be padlocked closed until the fire alarm is installed and all other deficiencies in this room are corrected. Eliminating the use of the larger room will accomplish several things: 1. It changes the occupancy classification from an A -3 to a B -2. This means none of the curtains in your building have to be flame- retardant treated. Ji3 n V ` Mr. Hatt Hogua, VFU September 6 1985 page two 2. It negates the requireme:,t to have o fire alarr) system by reiucing the total occupant load bel•;w 3b0 persona. 3. It means the panic hardware does not have to lie repaired or adjusted in the Main Hall. Any questions st.)uld be directed to Chief Almand during the week. of September S. 1 have scheduled a reinspection for September 19 at 2:00 p.m. Failure to correct all violations by the ly:h will result in our recommendation to revoke the Conditional Use Permit on your occupancy. I again solicit your cooperation in bringing the VFW up to minimum fdrs and life safety standards. sincerely, , U&0n.D todtl, Susan D. Wolfe Fire Preveation Inspector enclosure mbm i PPn ,JTECTION DISMCT P. 0. COX 33 . 6623 AMETHYST ST. • BANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 (7I4) 987-7335 August 38, 1985 0 I'o t LN FP UGC wt'$ "'���F rUL� ':% %\Nh r. j Y �� 41 r7ss6 Air. Bruce Cook Planning Deportment City of Rancho Cucomonga P. D Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 51730 RE: VFW, 87511ndustrlcl Lm, e Dear Mr. Cook: This Is the paperwork on the VFW I e1scussed with you Friday, August 5, y Saptc,nber you can see, to d by t19hat' 85. hove some violations which should be correc- te Please call if you nave any guestloas regarding this occupancy. I S hall advise either you or Don Coleman when all the violations a e cc ected. Sincerely, '1 "" '4641),D- (Lf dL4 Susan D. Wolfe / �" Fire Prevention inspector SD Wiss aaclasures ,3 4w i 1� ♦ t �e�`i- n If f' t r. .r , ag+ y lr A o a1l i re P aFEr N DjjSMj(CT F. 0. BOX 35. 6617 AMETHYST ST . aANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 (7141997 -]335 February 19, 1985 :I "' '4 CITY OF C,ids f CUCAMGI {C "G'dMlt a f °91 NT DEPT. FES 1Q 19, d AP ou ^, i.o,lltlhi2111G18191516 Car #A 11V Ms. Nancy Fong, Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 007 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: CUP - VFW Poot 0680, 8751 Industrial 1+ne Dear Ms. Pong: As of this time, we have not issued a permit to conduct a Place of public assembly to the VFW. The VFW still owes us a plan Showing all the aisle ways in the respective assembly rooms. It wsS decidn•1 �h4t the video games would be relocated, which will ehan9r the occupant load in the 'Second Hall'. The VFW must also submit a letter stating th -are will be o frying in the kitchen. Otherwise we will be forced to ask for a fixed automatic fire extinguishing system over the stove. At this time, we prefer to deny extension of the CUP until such time as all our requests have been met. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, r lG1QYl Susan D. Wolf, / Fire Prevention Inspector SDW /ss J+:`4i i•nik4 ``.' 9. ' ' s: i . ARIDAVIT q1 ptltl&iCATIO+ ' !4s"-TAIEOFCAIII pRMA S y :tbETMOF g (j +e F: �?f Naurine D.EpMAnIW y,l tbuaay arrJ State aforesaid am filet gm at in city of' 0( Kotic —pull is Hearin[ , City Council City of Rancho CucaMarta 6Y "FooWbliahedInaaldnewspeper One ti) tint t •3 !*!Pit: July 3. 1946 �f coder �" P"J+ay that Me fwgft is in* and �Aated at Ontario. CWHM7112 th18 t % daycf J ` W@ . •.a w - :Y 9 I� 9!+ f W@ . •.a w - :Y 9 I� 9!+ b' s t "�'`+:Y ;tr.:t.�.• -_ . ': �`• '.•�.: if' � '`i;'�4'"i'v'lniis.: +t'�'Vy'<{• :CITY. OPR;LNCSbCGCAJI0YG1 Cicu +r) MEMORANDUM ,lam. •,_ DATE: July 2, 19th TD: Hayor and Ne.mbors of the C1 until FROM: Brad Buller, City Planne BY: Lisa 1Nninger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AHENDHENT 86 -02A AHD ETINANBA SPECIFIC N Y The above referenced items are scheduled for the July 2, 1986 City Council agenda. The applicant has submitted a letter re'luesting a continuance of the Public Hearing for these Items until the July ". 1986 City Council meeting (see attached). Since the hens have been advertised for Public Hearing, the Council Is required to open the hearing at this meeting. However, staff recommends continuance of the final disposition of these Items until the July 16th meeting when the applicant will be able to be present. 88:LN:ns MY �•1y N' IA lyn AN 2s rses av June 23, 1986 /89 1�ru1�1Zi2i31g1Ji4 S• 1 1I„3'';tyip City of Rancho Cucamonga - Attn: Otto Kroutil P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -0807 Dear Otto: This letter Is to request that the General Pla,. Amendment 86 -02A and the £tiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 86 01 be postponed until the follo iwing July 16 Council meeting. I wll be out of town on July 2 and will be unable to attend. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, TH�Ki AA NY Andrew Barmaktan President / �J AB /Jbl c L7 i YY,v Ys, the undersigned, appro by The Boraakian ve of dcveloping a neighborhood shopping canter Cospany on the northwast corner of gtlwanda and gasoline Avenue. Ya fEZ' this locction will serve the citizens of the Htiwanda area aost effectiv.ly, Naga Address 4100 Lc+lg m �! those � :.�; his �• �i ZC Se.9. d.%�f •i�r dp L'�itP.7/ ;.�K of ,P P99.7Zo I bai e.e ' 1 old • s IM" .a L taw .�.� • a+ � t 4 f ■ . �.... :7 .. t. •sea �I1 I,Ra I _ e • • ' Z-. I /f % Of .w f Ya, the undarsiZaed, approve of developing • me lghborhood :hopping c•.ntar by the Barma@lan Company on the nnrihvest corner of Btivsada and Baseline Avenue. We fEBl this location vill sutve the citizens of the :tivauda area most effectively. t� � Name Address Phone � L. Phone p r-+•. I�19nYa�li%Y Iz 3 FUC.S�S /i4 �,qM 19. 4A 119b . k.1• 5. :1 Vey the node raigmad. approve of developing a neighborhood shopping canter by Tha Esrmak.lau Company on the northuest corner of Etiwanda and Baseline Avenue. Va f4M this location will serve the cittsena of the Etivanda area most effectively. Name Addres■ 3� nc� Phone / w w L %Jeo to Fro l:r At" w, we, the undareigned, approve of developing a neighbo rbood whooping eecter by 76e Barmak Lan Company on the northwest corner oP Btiwends and Baseline Avenue. Vs fPEl this location will serve the eltlsans of the Btiwanda area most effectively. Nnue Address Phone / Maui Len 9 tieea ru E I S IM 6 ,. 4 �S w Pa. the undersigned, approve of developing s neighborhood shopping center by The aarmakisn company on the northvost corner of Et1v.lnda and baseline Avenue. Vs fm this location will serve the citizens of the Etivauda area most effectively. Name Address Poona IiioUlmngw.6E1 a WN rtj a�� '701.1. ,rte ', � -• F 99 �/2 i o Lf /z /s y� •✓ .12 .CJie/ �t /.."s'• y/ Y°Lxn.�r �i.�✓o. -to _22 • yr, �� -'•-' 3054 /a'Z!aL°' 4 ).1Y •T4S + Ye. the underalgoed•„ approve of dsveloplug a neighborhood shopping center by The Barmaklan Company on the northwest corner it Etlwanda and Baasllne the cltlaani of of Avenue. Ne f!!1 this location will serve the Etivanda area most effectively. Name ..11 #0.3 L.,,5 Address Phone i 3m6 �merrp S.9Yfz�Z 8`rKi 471-1147 .31- rI 7• ° f 30 �NAelis, 5T 3�99195`cr ��r� 6. /3955 cA°i CEOS.w/btLDf� 8.4.Y r32�c1q " A-. 3 to.. ! . a-70 (Lnh) `�pl�vartda C�1 -07120 S, L 16, j a�lLewl�.~ 17. 'n E'c�uss .SSd6rtE2t -.� ' G- +•�;;.+ /.c�zr..- .,,�+y �+py' 19. 14. \l� S�ia•Q E LI� !IcA} r•r 9 � Jr ✓ ✓✓ vJ� i : L ,a We, the ondetolgned, approve of developing a nalgFborhood shopping center by The Baru klan Compsny on the northwest corner o _ Ltowacda and gaselone Avenue. Qa fW this f location n1i1 serve citizens of the-Ztowanda area Most effec lovely, Name Address 11OW 1017C. Phone 0 4iveD i. N ETI ` 'r_L�L ! . /a`%l3 /srL�ye __ 899 - ✓i// /-Li A— I- S' Ye, the aadezai=ned, approve of dcvelop!¢s • naiDhh othood shopping cantor by She Daruaklan Company no tiz northwest corner of C tiwenda and Daseli¢e Avenue, Va fM this loca son will serve the eitizans of the Dtivanda area soot effectively, e� Hazes Address phone 6 10. 11. � 13. 17. 18. ^ 19. 20. 0 wt CITY OF RANCHO CCCASIONrA STAFF REPORT UATE: July 2, 1986 T0: Mayor and Merbers of the City council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSW?rt AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -OZA mnara in f•omgLow MedlumnDensitya Residential (4 -8 du /ac) to Neighborhood Commercial for Approxiately five Pores of land, located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Ettwanda - APN: 227 - 111 -24, 25, and 26. ENYIRONWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWAADA SPECIFIC PLAN Eiiwn aT - n raques aer-r. (Low Medium Density to NC (Neighborh000dd Commercial) for 9.4 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda - APN: 227 - 111 -10, 24, 25, and H. I BACKGROUND: The applicant requested a General Plan Amendment and wan peclflc Plan Amendment from Low Medium Density Residential /Coammnfty Service to N019Ltnrhood Commercial for a 9.4 acre site in order to develop a 94,000 squaw foot neighborhood shopping center on the northwest corner of Base Line and Ettwanda Avenue. The attached Planning Commission report 77rovides more detailed information regarding this item. The C1omission is recommending denial of this request. II. PLANIMINC COMMISSION ACTION: The major issues considered by the Planning Coma ss on a MWM&Y 28, 1986 meeting were consistency with the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan goals and policies, and land use compatibility. The Planning Commission determined that the proposed land use ehaa+e would be inconsistent with the goals of the Ettwanda Spectric Plan which limits commercial activity and additional traffic generated by commercial uses on Etitm -n4a Avenue. The proposed neighborhood shopping center would be looted within one B of Base Line td in the VictoriaaPtlanned Ccmnity. Theo Etlewanda Specific Plan states that neighborhood commercial centers should be located no closer than On* mile of one anther. /�) ID f„7' - 1 2 . y CIIY'COa8C1L'STAfF REcORY ' July 2, 1914 GPA 86-n2A and ESPA'86 -01 - Barmakfan Page 2 The Commission also stated that the proposod change to Ntighbo: °hood Commercial would be less compatible with surrounding re:idential land ases than the existing taw Nedfua Residential /C"j:nity s Services designation. In conclusion, the Comimission felt that the request represented a significant departure from tho intent of the EtWanda Specific Plan ofd the General Plan. Ill. RECOHIENOA'fON: , The Planning Commission reto aw�d� denisl of the anera an Amenow.% and Etiwanda Speciffo Plan Men, wt. if the City Council concurs, adoption of the artarhec Resolution o• Denial would be required. Re p�ctfzyeftn-� 1! Brad Buller City Planner h 80:LAW :dak Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of Me/ 20, 1986 ± Resolution of Denial of General Plan Axeedmant Resolution of Dental of Etiwanda Spec'-fie Plan Amendment 0 E 0 r{ , 1101m Cr. Y OF RAD,CHO CCCA.IIO`GA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 28, 1986 �O' 4 . 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Ccamission FROM: Brad huller, City Planner BY: Lisa Mininger, Asslstant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -02A Jaques o amen the an Use Map o the b`eneraT —PTLn fraa Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du/ac) to Neighborhood Commercial for approximately five titres of land, located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda - APN: 227 - 111 -24, 25, and 26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIIIANOA SPCCIFIC PLAN AMENS I, no-01 - A request to amend t o wa Eii nda 399iIfis Plan fm w� S (foawnity Service) and LM (Low MMiue Density Residential) to NC (Neighborhood Commmercial) for 9.4 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda - AFN: 227 - 111 -10, 24, 25, and 26. 4, I ABSTRACT: The General Plan Amendment and Et1wanda Specific Plan ec 7�ndma—W are requested from Low Medium Density Residential /Commxm:.y Service to Neighborhood Commercial for a 9.4 acre site located on the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda Avenue. be applicant has stated that it is his intent to develop a neighborhood shcoping center. At this meeting, after pcblic input, tto C.mission will determine if any additional eaviromeenlal arelyyssis will be required or make a oatermination ,., regarding the amendment. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested a General Plan Amendment an i -wanda Specific Plan Amendment for a 9.4 acre site located an the northwest corner of Bass Li6e and Etlwands. Under the current General Plan, approximately half of the site is Low - Medium Density Residential with the emainder Neignborhood Commercial. tinder the Etiwanda Specific flan (ESPi, the site is designated Community Services with the we small lots in the northeast corner designated as Low McJiue Density Resi'vmtial (see Exhibits •A• and 'B'). �,1 4 PLAnYING COHHIS .H STAFF REPCRT AAA GPA 86 -02A and ESPA 86 -01 May 28, 1986 Page 2 The Community Services designation in the Ettwanda Plan was created to Provide opportunities for limited or specialized low impact conmercial and quasi- commrcial services to a residential setting, with commercial development not to exceed 40,000 square feet. Site development requires a Conditional Use Permit end master plan, with conditionally approved uses listed as community uses (schools, parks, churches, etc.), Low Medium Density j Residential and limited Commercial. The request under consideration is for: 1. An amendment of the Ganeral Plan to expand the Neighborhood Commercial designatton to the entire site; and 2. An mmmdment of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to eliminate the Community Services and Low Medium designation and designate the entire site as Neighborhood Comeenial. 111. GENERAL PLAN /ETIVANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS In order to evaluate t�ppl cat en, t s necessary to consider the background of the project site, the Etiwanda Specific Plan adoption process, and consistency wit the policies of the ESP and General Plan. A. Back�roun�d: Prior to to adoption of the Etlwanda Specific Plan in 1483, numerous hearings were held to receive public input on to content of the p1m. The Etiwanda Specific Plan was developed to provide more detailed and site specific guidelines for future development of Ettwanda with the goal of preserving the character of the area, while requiring new development to incorporate the architectural character consistent wit the community. The Specific Plan provides detailed implementation %,assures in order to carry the goals and policies of the General Plan. The project site was identified through the public hearing process as particularly sensitive from a planning perspective due to its location on Etiwanda Avenue. The Coamnity Service designation was conceived for this site to o,der to provide a means for site specific controls. The property owner (who is also the applicant for this project) initiated the original proposal. His stated intent at the t1ft the Etiwanda.Specific Plan was prepared was to develop a small commercial project, possibly with a specialty market and other limited office /commercial space. The remaining portion of the site /1)3 er V PLAh'I1NG COMMIS JN STAFF REPORT iky 86,01986nd ESPA 86 -01 Page 7 would be developed with Low Medius tensity residential. The dasign of this mixed use project was to reinforce the charactar cf Etiwanda by: a) Providingy A camunity focal point b ;Ieinforcing a sense of community, c '4einforcing Ettwanda's heritage. The designntion o" Community Services was approved by the Pla,ming ",y"153ion with this express intent and with very specific limi•:atioas on the scope of permitted commercial uses. As 4 practical result ef'the ESP process, the General Plan was amended prior to final adoption of the ESP. Since no Community Services land use district existed in the General Pian, the closest designations were deemed to be the Low - Medium Residential and NC districts. However, since it is the specific plan which is the Implementation vehicle for site development, the stringent Community Service district requiremantt should receive extensive review in this process. The applicant has requested a General Plan Amendment end 4tiwanda Specific Plan Ammndment in order to develop the entire 9.4 acre site as a shopping ce;,ter of approximately 94.000 square feet, incorporating a supermarket, drug store, tenant spaces, and free standing office, fast food and gas station structures (see Exhibit 4C4, Site Plan The applicant has submitted a letter of justification (attached, Exhibit 404), stating that the existing Low Medium Density residential designaticn is less acceptabla to area residents than a change from Community Service to Neighborhood Commercial. Staff has not as yet received any comments from the Etiwanda community regarding this issue. 8. Land IFJ Canmatibillii%: The project is bounded on the north an was y t e Ylctoria Planned Community. The areas adjacen t to the site are designated as Low Density Residential. Across Etiwanda Avenue to the east and south across Bass) Line Road, the designation under the Etiwanda Specific Pian is Low Nedioa Density Lesidential. The ESP and General Plan state that the City should encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible, land uses while organizing land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent uses. Wdle the proposed caanmercial use would not create severe incopatibilities with adjacent single- family /01/- - , r 'r_ PLMNING COMKMISSION .fAFF REPORT GPA 86 -02A and ESPA 86 -01 May 28, 1986 Page 4 residential development, the impact of the expanded commercial area would undoubtedly be more significant than with the existing designation in which a small commercial center would be buffered from the Victoria Development by ring of Low Medium Density residences. The intensity of the proposed land use is less compatible with adjacent uses than the existing designation. C. Consistencl with Adopted Goals and Ob actives: The Etiwanda pee a an objectives or compere a development can be summarised as an effort to prevent coeerclal activity and associated traffic '-from impacting community character, particularly to the core area on Etlwand■ and Victory Avenues, while providing necessary commercial opportunities to area residents. The Comsminity Services Dintrlct was established as a residential district which also allows limited or specialized low impact comwerclal services. Neighborhood Commercial is defined as •provided to meet the retail and service needs of a cluster of neighborhoods, with a total leasable area from 30,000 to 1001,000 square feet'. The plan notes that neighborhood commercial centers should be located no closer than one mile from one another and should not encourage vehicular traffic in established residential areas or on Etiwanda Avenue. The nearest neighborhood commercial designation to the project site is located approximately one- quarter mile west on Base Line Road In the Victoria planned Community. Approval of this request would allow two comparable commercial centers within a quarter mile of each other. Another objective of the One of the main reasons provide a means to prrser'v area, including the rural links to the past. The p particularly sensitive to location in the heart of Et requires special landscape which blends with the sun has submitted a conceptus' proposod shopping center. will be available for ri relates to caramunity identity. the plan was developed was to a unique characteristics of the ran eent and cultural /historical ct site has been designated as a concerns due to its critical da. Development of any project design treatments of a scale '1ng community. The applicant to pion and elevations of the larings of the proposed project r at the hearina. Althouah understanding of the applicants proposal. Uhila the alevations indicate an intent on the architect's part, to employ a style appropriate to the area, tho scale of the structure, particularly the supermarket at 60* feet tall; appears to be somewhat disproportionate with its surroundings.-.;. r'i PLA1C11" CON415 Jh STAFF REPORT GPA 86 -02A and ESPA 86 -01 .- may 28, 1986 Page 5 0. Conclusions: The proposed land use change represents a s gn cant departure from the exlstinl land use deli nation conslisteencywitlnrgoat terms of land use of the ESPtandiGene al Plan. In general, the application appears inappropriate for the following reasons: I. The proposal land use does qot meet the Intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding limitations on the type of commercial uses and associated traffic on Etiwanda Avenue, and particularly, of the project site. 2. The proposed neighborhood cammercial center will be located too cl.ae to a neighborhood center already designated on the General Plan and Victoria Community Plan as one quarter mile west of the project site. 3. Land uses would be less compatible with zdjacent properties If the land use change were approved, since the development intensity of the site would be substantially greater. 4. The con:eptual site elan and elevations do not meat he archit s a ectual and design elements. a . especialiy relat ng to scale and pedestrian orientation. Plan%Ettaands Specific plantAenesendsen0 application the does not provide a adequate justification for amending the Etiwanda Specific Plan and General Plan. IV. ENY1ROhMENTAI. ANALYSIS: The initial Study prepared by staff tapaaet. es They are: land andfor pplanningalconsideraations-. circulation; cultural resources; hsalth, safety and nuisance factors; and aesthetics, as discus:fed below: A. Land Use and PlannInn .Consldrratlon• The project area is currun yy acs qna ad as Tor 11RT padsity Residanttal and Netghborhnod Cwwrclal under the General Plan, ,r,d zoned Community Services under the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Planned land uses surrounding thto site are residential in nature. A change from residential and limited otfice /commercial to nei;hborhood commercial dprOSUPts a significant lard use Impact upon the area. /06 PLAT•.` IG C011311S jd STAFF REPCRC 0A 86 -02A and ESPA 86 -01 Itay 28, 1986 Page 6 S. Circulation: The site is located at the Intersectiun of Base ne an lwanda Avenue. The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposed land use change and stated that additional information will be required of the applicant to fully evaluate traffic impacto generated by the project. C. Cultural Resources: Development of the site as a 9 acre commercial cen er could Impact cultural resources in two ways. A direct impact could be the disturbance or elimination of the rock curbs on Etiwanda Avenue. Indirectly, the project could impact the adjacent Chaffay- Garcia Foust and Etiwanda Congregational Church with additional traffic and noise. 0. Health Saf_ett and Nuisance Factors: Development of the site asnrigh�or ooh comma New r could create an increase and potential noise levels and light and glare. E. Aesthetics: The portion of this project site along Etiwanda Avenue es in the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District. The intent of this district is to protect and enhance the visual and historical charcter of F,tiwarda Avenue. The proposed project could represent a conflict with the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Analysis: Staff fees that additional information on the five areas sted above may be necessary prior to final consideration of the General Plan Amendment. If the Commission so desires, the applicant may be required to submit supplemental information such as traffic and noise studios In order to provide more Information on potential impacts and proposed mitigation measures prior to further consideration of the amendments. V. FACTS FOR FIND_ I Should the Commission, upon examinecion of t e anera an Juendmant and Etiwanda Specific Plan Aaeudmant, decide that the change from LOW- Medtua Density Residential and Community Services to Neighborhood Commercial would promote the land use goals and policies of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plun and would not be materially detrimental to the adjacent proparties, or would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings necessary on -, A. The amendment does riot conflict with the land use policies of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan, and B. The amendment doss promote goals of the land use element, and C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. PLANUING COt•WISSIOA ,tAFF REPORT GPA 86 -OZA and ESPA 86-01 May 28, 1986 Page 1 VI. Ca 'ESPORDENCS: This item has been advertised as a public bearing tip -1 lSai1 Re ort nes,spaper and notices we ro sent to all property awnor$ w n feet of the boundary of the proposed projett. In addition, a 4 foot by 8 foot supplemental notification sign has been eructed on sit *. VII. RECOMMENDAIIDN: Based on tho above analysis, the Commission has severe a ern; tices regarding the General Plan Amendment /Etiwanda Specific Plan aawndmeat application. The alternatives aro: 1. Dany the amendrmts with no further study. 2. Request the applicant to submit additiocal environmental information either in the form of detailed studies or a focused environment[, impact report with a scope to be determined by the Commission at this meeting. 3. Approve the amendment as submitted. This would require the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Staff recommendation is far denial of this application. Should the Cefssicn wish to ac: upon the request tonight, a Resolution r emecommending denial of the General Plan Amendment to the City Council and a Resolution denying the Ettwanda Specific Plan Amendment, and Resoletions recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment and Etlwanda Specific Amendment, dnd issuance of a Negative Declaration are attached. Rospacofully submitted, /Brad Buller City Planner 88:LM:cv Attarmoents: Exhibit *A• - Vicinity Map Exhibit 'Be - Land Use Designations Exhibit •Ce - Site Plan Exhibit 80" - Letter of Justification Initial Study - Part II Resolution recommending Approval Resolution recom minding Approval Resolution recoemu-nding Denial Resolution of Denial (j �ft, 04W ,LM , T i r \/L--.-1 rr!AAA4 RANCHO CLrA;WCNCA rrrJ�a mu., ��-a 8em• c- ,e - K ANNING DmXN yurt —r.� sc;�u; _ P a� Q I M'l IF _v LL n� T vJ U 3 \ •v— n aqj - -- -- , ��-- -- "t iI t -r- W� ? 3.1\ ! _ rr a � � i' sue/ /3 a I N I Q A r. 4;. w. t` 1 C March 14, 1986 F r Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Ste. C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Planning Staff Gentlemen: I am writing this letter to justify the reasons for an amendment to the General plan adopted by the City of Ilancno CuCamonga. This zone change request Is being made because of concerns that residents of the Etiwanda area have regarding oar corner. Mr. Banks has contacted me about the apartments that we had scheduled to build on the property adjacent to our shopping center corner at Etiwanda and Baseline. It is his feeling and 1:hose of the Etiwanda residents that a larger commercial designation at that corner would be acceptable to the resfdents of the Etiwanda area providing the apartments can be eliminated. The Etiwanda Group has several concerns. First, they would like to be sure that we have only specific approval for the specific development that we are proposing and we give them an oppartunity to comment and approve our -reposed project before the planning commission approves it. Secondly, the center would aesthetically conform to the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan in every way, particularly with regard to its rural appearance. Third, the center must bit the first on Baseline west of the one proposed at Haven. This extents •o Fontana. They want the center to be successful sd that it will remain clean and safe. If our center is not first, they fear that Victoria or Fontana WI steal our vitality. I ' , EXHIBIT •D'; 9315A ACHISAILD AVENUE SUITE 101 . SANCHOCUCAMONUA . CALIFORNIA 91,730 ;11. ;••. ••.: Development Brokerage • Property management • Architecture • lingmeenrg ys `s. Planning Department Staff March 19, 1986 Page 2 Foerth, they are expectIng us 1:1) take reasonable steps, by lease provisions or selectivity or other accoetable means, to see that „+ neither the center nor any part of it becoaes a "hangy-out" for any wellilit, rhavouwideThe aislas, o5nwwe llb"aintainedeandaotherwisefirms. be good citizens of the community. Fifth, the center w11i be other wise committed to preserving the theavastmmajorityoofEtraffic an Baselinee and . offcE tiwaedaeAvenue which is to remain unchanged with its rock turbo and gutters , restored. I believe that the concerns of the Etiwands Group are ,lust <fitation enough for the shopping canter that we would like to construct at the nirthuest corner of Etlwanda and Baseline. We behave that if we meet the requirements of the Etiwanda Group, we will have a vary °4 -e center and one that is custom built. Sincerely, MAXI �0 AMY i, , i fnd"w Barmaklan President AB:sm L u A .j RESOLUTLON 10. 86 -201 A RRSOLUTICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THR CZ-Tr Of RANCHO COCAMCR•'t, CALIFORNIA DYT114 GROWL PLAN AMENDMENT 10. 86 -01A, AME9DY6i. THE LAND USX ELEMENT OP THE RANCHO CUI'AKCSGA CEIERAL PLAN WRAHGIS, the City Council hen belt • daly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the prepared General Plan Amendment 86 -OZAe SECTION It The Rancho Cucamonga City Council few= mace the follcwing findin -,a: A. The Amendment does not e.onfliet with the Land Use Policies of the :antral Plan. R. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not bu materially injurious or detrimental to the wdjacent properties. NOW. THRIVORE. BE IT RB90LVED8 that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby deny General Plan Amendment 86 -02A. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED We day of , 1986. RYAS: NOBS: ADEENI: AT:EST: } „ feverly A. Authelet. City Clerk Jeffrey Ring. Mayor I3Y s I . 'J•-^Yn' :�a :.yw :Y ✓� <.r•�•; sr -. ` r`� � ° IL - 7E: '°„�.l''y,„aj2iyw ,EEgOLDTION "P0. '36 -202 A '1fSOLUTICM OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF E431CHO COCAMOPC4, CALIFORNIA, DENTING ETIMANDA SPECIFIC MAN AMENDMENT 00. 86 -01, RBQDESTMG A CHUG$ IN THE CMANDA SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATIM FROM COMMUNITY SERVICE TO FEICHBORHOW COdMERCLAL FOR 9.4 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED 01 TOE MIOETHWEST COEMER Of EASE LINE AND ETIYANDs OSERPAS, on the 14th day of March. 1986, an application vas filed mad accepted on the abovrdeueribed project; and HHBNAS, on the 28th day of May, 1986, the City Council hold a duly advertised public hearing parausat to Section 65054 of the California Covarament Code. arLjLQ ,,t The Rancho Cucamonga Cit7L Council cannot make the fulloving findings, 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in ter" of "csas, rice, and compatibility with existing land use in the sarrcuadiog area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not base significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in confor "nce vith the General Plan. NW, THEREFORE, EE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that thm City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby asnies on the 2nd day of July, 1986, Etivanda Specific flan Amendment No. 66 -01. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1986. ATESt gOKSt AbSENTt 1,35" t.'7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TL; City Council and City Manager VROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Pulwood, Aftseesment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Confirming Amended Assessments. EVALUATION: The Street and Highway Codi• Part 30, Section 8730 thru 8734 under Division o)' Land and Bond provides procedures for the apportionment of assessmentw necassltated by the division of land. The attached resolution confirms the amended assessments following the close of the public hearing. on June le, 1986, council approved the Resolution Ordering Preparation of a Reapportionment Report and Amended Assessment and Diagram In a Special Assessment District and Establishing a fee of a minimum fee of 81000 or 680 per lot. Additionally, Council approved a resolution passing on Teapportiorment Reports, giving preliminary approval, and vetting a time and place for a public hearing scheduled on July 16, 198f. The final Reapportionment Reports are attached for Council's consideration. They are applicable to the following Parcel Maps /Aosesement Parcel Numbers: 1) Parcel Map Number 9204 2) Parcel Map Number 9498 3) Parcel Map Number 8763 4) Parcel Map )lumber 9302 0) Parcel Map Number 8891 6) Parcel Map Number 8696 /36 > -m i • ;J r+ � �t Tho Public Hearing Notice has been published twice in a local newspaper as speeifiod in the Streets and highway Code Part 30, Section 8730 thru Section 8736. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Gwnc11 approve Resolution conflrming amended assessments at :,lose of public hearing. R 17 lknoty Submitted, 4 obo Assist lWuger RR:JBB:kma .M RESOLUTION NO - D� 16 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESSMENTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, has previously confirmed assessments in a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 414unicipal Improvement Act of 19134, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 19150, being Division 10 of sa!d Code, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. (here.nafter referred to as '.ne "Assessment District "); and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and /or parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assessments have been apportioned or divided, and this legislative body did receive a Reapportionment Report and proposed amended assessment and did set a public hearing on the amended assessment, all as authorized pursuant to the provisions of Part 10 of the 'Improvement Bond Act of 1915 "; and, WHEREAS, at this time all notices have be n given as required by law; all persons interested in the original assessment, or in the lands affected thereby, or in the bonds secured thereby, did, at the time of the public hearing, have the opportunity to appear and protest against the amended assessinent; the legislative body did, at the public hearing, hear and determine all objections to the division of the assess- ments, and, this legislative body is now desi•ous to proceed to confirm the amended assessments NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 That the amended assessment contained in the °Reapportionment Report" is hereby approved and confirmed by this legislative body. SECTION 3 The City Clerk shall, immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, cause the following: ,. A. File a copy of the amended assessment, as confirmed, with the County Auditor, who shall annually thereaf:tr enter upon the assessment roll the installments coming due on eacl, ccaponent part of the original parcel opposite a description of the respective parcels so assessed. B. The amount charged for fees and costs as shown on the amended assess- ment as to each parcel shall be entered upon the assessment roll and shall be collected along with the first installment of the amended assessment 138- t. aI t1 L All amour's collected for fees and costs of the reapportlorxoent shall be deposited in the General Fund of the City D. The amended assessment roll and diagram shall immediately be recorded in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets. E A copy of the amended assessment diagram shall immediately be filed to the Office of the County Recorder, and said amended diagram shall cross reference the original assessment diagran for the Assessment District. Said amended diagram shall contain the information as set forth in Section 8734 of the Streets and Highways Code R APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1986 ATT:ST: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA MAYOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA j39 •' ' �' yx' • r,vlry,•r r.,w •�• rn,r o ♦r, . y'ySTATEOFCAIJFOFWU . 4 (1S * *... ... -. � ��, ?3t I,+ Meurint D. Galan' t. do; hereby certify that �i�0Ya++,ue�iK4 Fun the Lew AdvOUM chd', OUTHE DAILY REPORT, a dally, netvepaper of general circulation, In the City of Ont W,-' i Coucsy and State nfarataid and that, the aNtactxd sdveRsanerd of Resolution No 86 -195 r r••� Rrr , ,t for the City of Rancho Cucamonga a a•w.+rrwliw i A • • M MMiiWwr}pjiII1KI M G,�YrY, •Y,nwl 4 r ,4 k 11 . .NY Y,MYYri4„v.y • sgsispubU3hedIn wild netnpapei Two f2> tio a 1.• M Mr•p Y Nla .-. -.. Sr to%tt: June 26 and MY 30 1986 j I certify under penalty of P&Iury th t the fe M*9 is true and COMVL �� - tSlbse s • Dated at Ontario, C.aliforlLathis 3rd d yof i July 186• r.ira r MUM r i �yw r+ .r �• r I rtzn t', � iii •98rc3h!5, �,4.d�. =' �^s c'lMp4fi'` � «•. •"O - .rYA }'�'+�'i t �• r I rtzn t', � iii •98rc3h!5, �,4.d�. =' �^s c'lMp4fi'` � «•. •"O - .rYA }'�'+�'i t Y: V I ` WINERY BUSINESS CENTRE of July 7, 1986 "RECEIVED M ar aAN cucnM HQ4 r't.Wrum QMSIOM JUL 0 91986 AM 7 t8t�lll1>Zi1i2131dt016 Me. Dan Coleman 9320 baseline Road P O.BUx 807 Rancho Cucamonsa, California 91730 Dear Can: We would like this letter to confirm our "Withdrawal of Appeal' from the City Council regarding the treatment of the exterior of the Edwards Cinema at the Virginia Dare Winery Business Centre. As per the planning commissions' request, we have opted to stucco the exterior of the theatre building. Sincerely, 'OA40c� Don Chris4eson DC:cd 1601'Dove Street, Sulle 160 -Newport Beach. 92660 r (714)833.0590 Y a i . e X •YY.�p}P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ! Z J S Lmn DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VIRGINIA DARE UNIFORB SIGN PROGRAM I. DACKCROUND: On June 18, 1986, the City Council conducted a hearing l c% onsidrr the appeal of the Planning Ceceiission's denial of the Virginia Dare Uniform Sign Program application. After considering I public testimony, the City Council directed tm applicant to work I with the Planning Comission-and staff to resolve the signage issues. Staff has met with the developer and reached an agreement on acceptable modifications to the Uniform Sign Prayran. In general, back -lit cast aluminum letters will be used instead of internally illuminated channeltzed letters. The Optima letter style will be the established copy style, with exception of occupants of entire buildings (i.e., Spires and Edwards Cinema), whicn will utilize individual trademark letter styles to be back- lit. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the revised Uniform Sign Program on July 9, 1986. II RECOMMENDATI04i The Planning Commission had approved the Uniform action Qr a pplication as revised by the applicant. No further ac f City Council is necessary. Resp ly s ed„ Dan Coleman Senior Planner OC:SM:ko Attachments: Letter from Bissell Architects Revised Uniform Sign Program V sisse]I Architects June 26, 1986 , 434 Via Ldo Sune 250 Newport Peach CaLlornia 92M (714) 675.9901 cl ON Ly(y of 01 D1Nstow Dan Coleman �8t9iW)U1�1112i3iAi516 Planning Uivision City of Rancho ' ucamonga 9320 Baseline Rd., Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Our Meeting of 6 -26 -86 with Larry Tieman, Dave Michaels, and Scott Dear Dan: As a result of our meeting yesterday, the following ch, ;es to the Viriginia Dare Signage Guideline have been incorporateo into the attached guideline as described below: Page 2 - General Guidelines: Item 2: Major occupants of buildings 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, b 10 shall be allowed back lit letters utilizing "Optima" letter style. (Note: major occupant crust be a minimum of 3,000 square feet.) Item 3: Arcade signs at the Food ,.ourt building 8 and all trellis signage shall be "Optima" latter style. Item 4: Occupants of entire buildings (le: Spires, Edwards Cinema): Sole occupants of buildings within the Centre shall utilize individual letters to compose major signs. Letter sides and edges shall utilize the standard color and finish set forth in this guide. Logos will be permitted. Developer shall review signage designs on an individual basis with the intent of achieving compatibility of all signage within the Centre. Established trademark letter style will be allowed. Page 4 - Illuminated Letters: Described as back lit aluminum letters with dark green baked enamel finish. �Fi is Dan Coleman Page Two June 26, 1986 Page 5 - Arcade d Trellis Signs: Changed to 705. ' Page 6 - Edwards Cinema: Changed to rose plastic ,face. ` Page 12 - Deleted. Your verbal agreement to concur with these cianges wdll assure a recw=endation for approval the ` of attached luidelftes at the upccming Planning Commission hearing. Sincerely, � • /. %�/ ��. � _ it Glen Gellatly GG:tms Attachment cc: Larry Tieman .•�y�•""_1 GUIDE S�GNAC� .`. VIRGINIA DARE, WINERY r BUSINESS CENTRE r I DEVELOPMENT BY: Christeson Company 1501 Quail Street Newport Beach CA 92660 Guide by: "'sse11 Arcl%gcts ~ -s 3434 Via Udo„ But* no Newport Beach. caufomw 92083 (714) 675.9901 Ig;t r t n 11uI 1 °t1111 GENERAL GUIDELINES 1. The fol lowing guide is intended to set minimum and maxi= si gnage standards for all occupants of the Virginia Dare Winery Business Centre. All designs must be presented to Developer for approval beore work infany design thatu does Onot,oinr the sapt nion hofr the tDe to "loper,econforns with the overall standards of the centre All stgnage %hall be subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga sign program guidelines 2. Major occupants of buildings 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 6 to shall be allowed bat's lit letters utilizing "Optima" letter• feet.) (Note: major occupa minimum of must be a minimu of 3, t square 3. Arcade signs at the load Court building B and all trellis stgnage shs.i be "Optima" loiter style 4 Occupants of entire 'uildings (ie: Spires, Edwards Cinema): Sole occupants of buildin s within the Contra shall utilize individual s letters to cemposs r, jcr signs Letter sides and edge shall utilize the standar t.•lor and finish set Earth in :his guide Logos will Fe pa rmi au. Devulopsv (hall review aignage daulgns on an ineividual basis is h the Lnteut of achiovin0 Lompatibilcty of all sifnage with! a Centre Fastabllshed trademark latter style will b, allownd. 5. Storefront glass: tg„age consisting of 2 ", P. or ll" hL Optima white vinyl letters oaf be lffixed to exterior storefront &11155 INaximum height to b, 6' -6" above floor surface. Letters shall ®.. be applied CO inter.or surface of glass. 1111 • GENERAL CUi;DITIONS w w It lM! 1 sale or bessubjecttttos , the requirements of Virginia thisa Winery Business guide 2. size Lecolor howterielstands locations to•t hoe fDe ei -iper fernreviewrandin9 approval Upon approval from the Developer, the tenant shall acquire necessary approval and permits from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. All signs shall be constructed and installed at tenant's expense. 4. Requests for additional signs shall be subject to the discretion of the Developer. S signage on elevations. ectapproval Future building, upon signage approval by all governing authorities, shall incorporate elevations (with stgnage envelope) into Appendix to became past Of this Guide 6 The approved stgnage plans shall become a part of the tenant lease agreement. 7 Except as provided herein. NO pennants, placards, freestanding signs or in the landscapedar automobiles , oronr streets roraparking areas.thTheuilding, restriction pertaining to automobiles aces not apply to magnetic or painted tdeatificaticn signs placed on company ar private vehicles. for use in the normal course of business. 8. to remove any signs and return the face of the building Tenant agrees upen the. - y to its original condition, fair wear and tear excepted, p >a ^ s ,expiration of the lease or an y extension thereof r _ Stucco wall 10" h SITE SIGN igh letter; '— grey -tan 2i' thick c (total area of stgn 24 s.f.) °.VIRGINIA DARE WINERY BUSINESS CENTRE Baked enamel letters with gold face. dark green edges * Corner sign, roothill Z Haven �l f fTTRIPJITR ►nTli•TffaiTTTiTil7fiTl. I I NO" E: See APPEWIl for individval ou tlN ng •`evati'ins . . �" o H cl I I .�' .. /Into innnnumir.��..•�„� SITE PLAN /e/7 -Sign , location as Trellis signage See Sage S. BUILDING SIGNS SEE APPENDin FOR PRECISE LOCATIONS Address numerals: Individual numoers 10` high with reflective dark green face, dark green baked enamel sides to be supplied by Developer, ;1't r .• Letter style ror major tenant. 9 / �/ inated letters Back lit letters connected to electrical source in fascia /wall provided by Developer a N Letters to be aluminum with dark green baked enamel finish Tower Mar- 0 Replication of original signage for Centre theme to be provided by Developer •Signage limited to area over entry Letters Shall be monochromatic, non - illuminated cast aluminum. Double row ropy permiseable I _ BUILCING SIGNS AT' TFZF'_L iS '� See APPENDIX for precise locations. Electrical power supoly to strip fluorescent light behind trellis beam to be provided by Developer. 1- Bay Storefrmnt - i I i ti , Trellis signage\ —Sign ti be sanabtasca ---\ =BAKIEiRRS' %— rcpwa oa Nth B' raised letttn and border trio DOZEN I �O6 color.paLe Letters and trim background to be painted Fe dark green. Sign edges Hmging sign to have length slightly nosed. comrising 70%o1 each arcaoe opening. Recessed .ppclighting to be provided by Oavelopar. �•� i , 1 %�9 Food Court Arcade BUILDING SIGNS Occupants of Entire Buildings See APPENDIX for precise locations /5d le row internally ninated and back tit na bold letters 24" hi. ors to have rose plastic with dark green baked 0 sides. Developer shal :w siynage layouts on an ,idual basis for occupant hire buildings. lighting and specific ation signs shall hibited unless specific al by Developer and f Rancho Cucamonga wined. Established trademarks may be utilized at wall locations to be approved by Developer and City of Rancho Cucaaonga. Letter color and trim for backli illuminated signs shall match that previously specified ■ F' hE ANN" ca lum-ii-N-1 It 5 4 Rr SITE PLAN A3/ APPENDIX 1/ S �1lllill �Illlliil r•.u�iµ�t 0 1 3 pm raena� eun 1 KEG' 1 Building A - Offices 2 Tower Building - Offices 3 Building B - Offices r 4 Existing Budding 1 5 Spire's Restaurant 6 17' Future Office Building 7 Edward's Theaters 8 Future Office Building 9 Del Taco Restaurant 10 Future Office Building 11 Future Restaurant 12 Feoa Court • not within Centre development F' hE ANN" ca lum-ii-N-1 It 5 4 Rr SITE PLAN A3/ APPENDIX 1/ S �1lllill �Illlliil r•.u�iµ�t 0 1 3 pm raena� eun 1 r. / dx.:i ""'' .. 'r"'•b� � unu•�a viiTnn r • s � � a i e� •� J(F le r • 11 u � I C i / dx.:i Eke: u ©a� 5 5\ i 4 � t� Y_ 1 ' Ci WX I.P.-ri it Z Y agJS �� itI D3u� vo I �C H I 1 w w ; • t fl� w s- 1r . v 1 �3 z 2� !ll ;L• 0 0 0 w w ; • 0 y�rN J �3 z 2� !ll ;L• 0 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TO; City Council and City Manager FROMt Robert A. Rizzo Ass;siant City Manager SUBJECT: Modification to Advisory Commission Enabling Ordinance. ta� r As the City Council Is aware a subcommittee (Mayor King, Mayor Pro Tern Dahl) was appointed to meet with o subcommittee from the Advisory Commission (Chair Seldom, Chair- designote Huhn, and Immediate Post Chair Banks) to discuss the role and duties of the Advisory Commission. As a result of this meeting, both subcommittees agreed that revisions In the Advisory Commission enabling ordinance were needed. The modifications to the Advisory Commission enabling ordinance lie basically in four areast Consolidation of three wdirances (67, 87 -A, and 87 -B) Into one ordinance (87 -0 2. Removal of Members - members of the Advisory Commission may be removed at any regularly scheduled City Council muting, upon ten working days prior written notice to the member. Removal shall be by a majority vote of the entire City Council for malfeasonce or misfeasance In office, or violation of any code of conduct adopted by the Advisory Commission. 3. Establishment of a chair and chair - designate to preside at all meetings of the Advisory Commission. 4. Establishment of a City Council atbcommlttee and Advisory Commission subcomnnittee that would have joint meetings quarterly to develop a work program and review matters that have been stvdled by the Advisory Commission. Attached Is proposed Ordinance 87 -C for your review. Res tfUulllly submitted, �A. R Assistant hanager RARank Attachment AS6 ORDINANCE NO. 411-e- oc %� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOK4, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN ADVISORY COMMISSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Repealing of Ordinances 87, 87 -A, and 87 -0, SECTION 2: There is and shall remain in the city government an Advisory Coma ssi oh. Role o! Advisory Commission SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission shall act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and Planning Comeission an community issues and perform such other advisory functions as may ba delegated to the Advisory Commission from time to time by the Planning Commission or City Council. The Rancho Cucamonga Advisoryy Commission shall also bring forth and study issues perceived by it to be of inter�st to the citizens of the City. Citizen issues, when recognized by the Advisory Commission, sha'l be developed and presented to the City Council or Planning Commission or both in such a manner as will effectively enco_:age timely and proper consideration of any action upon such issues. Members of the Advisory Commission are encouraged to work with individual citizens and citizen groups and to communicate their interests to the City Council and Planning Commission. Their goal in this capacity shall be the advancement of citizen issues according to methods described above. A purpose of the Advisory Commissicn is to enhance communication between citizens and the City Council, increase involvement of the caaemity In decision making. The Advisory Commission is encouragee to adopt a formal procedure for community interaction. Alvlsory Commission Membership SECTION 4: The Advisory Commission shall consist of a total of fifteen (15) members with five i5) appointed from each of the three (3) geographic areas, designated by zip code in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, namely Alta Loma (91101), Cucamonga (91730), and Etimianda (91739) Members of the Advisory Commission shall be residents of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be appointed by the City Council. The nano of any person proposed for appointment by the City Council, the name of the appointee shall be recorded in the minutes of the City Council meeting. Terms of Appointment SECTION 5: The fifteen (15) members of the Advisory Commission shall each serve rep ) year teas. Ono -third of the Commission shall be considered annually by the City Council as set forth below. Either one or too members from each of the three subcommittees (Alta Lame, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda) shall complote their three (3) year term each year but each shall continue in 1JT% office until their respective successors are appointed as set forth below unless sooner removed as provided in this Ordinance. The staggered terms shal three (3) subcommittees am subcommittees will be consi In office until their rem removed as provided in this by expiration of the tern of City Council for the rnalnc terms shall terminate on Dec terms expire shall serve unt ide that two (2) mmbers from two (2) of the (1) member from one (1) of the three (3) annually for appointment and shall continue e successors are appointed unless sooner ante. If a vacancy shall occur, other then :e, it shall be filled by appointment of the the unexpired term. All regularly expiring thirty -first of each year, but members whose Ir successor is appointed. Removal of Members SECTION 6: Members of the Advisory Commission may be mmoved at any refu aT Ty�eduled City Council meeting, upon ten (10) working days' prior written notice to the member. Removal shall be by majority vote of the entire City Council for malfeasance or misfeasance in office, or violation of any Code of Conduct adopted by the Advisory Commission. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the actions or expressions of Advisory Commission members save and except the guidelines established by the Advisory Commission. negular Meetings SECTION 7: Regular meetings of the Advisary Commission shall be held on the To—PTIFTFursday monthly except In November and December, when the meetings will be combined and held the first Thursday of Dtcember. If the regular date falls on a holiday, or holiday weekend, the Advisory Commission will advance or postpone the meeting at the preceding regular meeting. Meetings of each subcommittee nay be held at the convenience of the subconittee. Officers SECTION 8: The Advisory Commission shall select a chairperson to preside at aT17me-e ingt of the Advisory Commission. The term of the chairperson shall be one (1) year, com®encing on January first of each year. The chairperson myv be removed by majority vote o! the Advisory Commission, taken at any regular meeting at wAich the removal is on the published agenda In the event a chairperson is unable to complete his /her term prior to the expiration of his or her term, the Advi ?cry Comisslon shall forthwith appoint a successor to serve the balance of toe unexpired term. The successor shall be selected from the same subcommittee as the person vacating the unexpired tem. The position of chair shall rotate annually among the subcommittees in the order Alta Loma, Etiwanda, Cucamonga. Each subcommittee of the Advisory Commission shall select a chairperson to preside at regular Subcommittee meetings and a vic,- chairperson to preside in the absence of the chairperson. �0 0 I If. � � I � i Y• • 1 A chair - designate Position will also serve for one year January first of each year, 'row the sut< ommittee which will Pr chair. The chair- designate will be confirmed as chair upon a nom the Advisory Commission taken at the regular meeting at which selected. In the event the chair- designate is unable to complat Cop prior orthwith appoint ta suiccessorht.o serve the balance ofdtheounexpi chair. The hpulrpose o these prooveisionsisitto establish alpresc annually the chair - designate shall be confirmed as the, Chat continuity while allowing each subcommittee to have its equal Chair positions. oaaaenetng on ride the next )r1 by vote of the Chair is his/her tern dssion shall .d urn. The ide the next lure by which to provide share of the When the Advisory ComVissfon chair is unable to preside over a meeting, the vice -chair Prom that subcowaittee shall net as chair in the absence of the if chair. designate shall act as chair, subcawittee is unable to servo then the Joint Subc'Jwalttee Neetinos SECTION 9: City Council Subcowaitteo and Advisory Commission Subcommittee (cha r, c a r- designate, and immediate past chair) Joint meetings shall be held quarterly on the first Tuesday of each calendar quarter which is nut a legal holiday. in the event this is aollidtingshaW ebencetled askeneeded by the next regula• working day. either subcommittee. The Joint qua-terty subcommittee meetings shall be for the purpose of establishing an Ad .:ory Coamission work program and review of matters studied by the Advlsory Coal tslon. k:� 9 Y ,r_ A z, , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 1, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager PROM: Mark Lorimar, Administrative Aealyst )'������—��� SUBJECT: Baek ,n 7eforeadon an Civic Caster Bite Acquisition For the City Council's geueral information, staff has reevarcbed tba files relative to chat madras veto made beginning in August, 1981 on the a:qulsitira of the civic center /lav and Justice center site. The folloving outlines the series of events vbich took pla,• in the acquisition of the civic center site. Copies of staff reports and sevopaper articles are attached far your referanee. ➢Alb ACT 909 August 3, 1981 City Council approves land sale agreament'vith the County of San Bernardino relative to the Civic Center /Law and Justice Center site. November 18, 1981 City Council reviews two schematic alternatives for development of the Roccbo Cucamonga Civic. Center Master Plan. Both achemea outlined the City gall, Cultural Coati:. Law and Justice Canter and County Jail (pre—trial datrlioa facility). The City Council umaniaoasly approved the revised ales plan (alternative B). February 2, 1987 Fleecing Commission reviewed the two acbeeatic alternatives for davolopmeat of the Civic Canter Master Plan. Horeb 17, 1986 City Council unanimously apprnves revised land sale agreement vith the Count• of San Bernardino relative to the CL�ic Canter /Lev cad Justice Canter site. ■ n J �=♦=s~ ,ti t >o,; ♦x• {{l lNfi :.r r� It it important to note that the intended use of the prraeotance balding facility is to house those individuals which are awaiting trial. As indicated by the County, one Laportant motivation tar locating the holding facility at the loathe Cucamonga site in to provide tunnel access between the Law and Justice Cecter and the bolding facility in order to transport prisoners within the moat secure of situaN ^ao. Without the direct tuanel access between the two facilities, prisoners would be transported by vehicle, thou presenting a groater'risk of escape and a greater hazard to safety within the com city. Iu the "eat the Municipal Courts are located at the Lew and Justice Ceateo, theme azrested and booked in Zaacbo Cucamocga wed the surrounding comasanitiea would be kept within the coof tact of maaimuw security and would not be sub;ect to vehicle transport from the court facility to the pre- seatence holding facility. Chould the Council wish additional information ragcarding this utter, please do not husLtate to contact me. Al' � ,...(• � ,- �`- �.i.�e_cowi�:a =7i ..,y fir._. ... • , ,:: r, • -iii. CnT 8TA" RjaPOitt A July 31. 19e1 Toe City Council FROM: Laren M. YaSSeresn, City FMesger SLtJE'I: County -City Land Alt 4_✓ V A9reeeMlt Law and ranterhiadMM Cir�iContKS aMf 9erael for the to sail to the City 7.5 acres for our wsa. #IhV* Cm ty� of®th� candtifon,�(K Coun[~ttue+ �fyryNjJ•�• Meause of the City's financtat tt to the City for actual cost, BurcMss the land and to reson The County a9re�snt specifies that the City py f7b0,Opp tM County on J?5. 15, l.%2 and an additfonal I$750.D.55 on or Ply before January t5, 1943 In a:ditton the City ogress to -53 one halt of the Incidental costs such as escrow foes. title lntunnce, title "Port negotiations It IthIs anticipatedethets an/ protMrty aequl- sition M work will not exceed $5.0w. the City share for thin agCMM6ntt with it 1sty 1""ndod that tM City Council a and sale o the city y oltland Su. 5enardfno raMrding the and sale to approve the Center and Civic Center. Ponds wtil but yCjlaby �w and wrcMse eftnaets as spactftad In the a meet the coal. Dr'taeent. LFM /Y: on 4'T "'ER-OFFICE MEMO DATE July 28, 1081aw_+rrD. FROM THOMAS H. SHARPE PHONE 3323 r. Senior Right of May Agent f TO JOHN MICHAELSON A Administrative Analyst Z SUBJECT VEST VALLEY LAW &W JUSTICE CENTER - CCCAMONOA Listed as follows is a breakdown of anticipatoi costs to be incurred 4 -2r the acquisition of land for the subject property. a. Labor cbarges Administration, appraisal h negotiations ;3,200.00, b Escrow fees 450.00 c. Title insurance 8,038.50 d Title report 100.00 A-PPROXIMATE COST $0,788.50 TBS:bch ac James L. Mattbewa q AM. 1/114 4 COUNTY -CITY LAND SALE AOREEMM 0 THIS AORta$NT, dsted r 1981. 11 between the -OUNTY or SAN BQRNARUITEO a o ea•_i y�anS ageasy (•COUNTY•). and the CITY or RANCHO CUaWNGA (•CITY"), a general law city organised pursuant to California Law. N ITN 6 8 H E T!: WMMEAS, the COUNTY, a body corporate and politic, intends to b000m3 the owner of certain real property located within the City limits of OITY consisting of approximately 25.5 acres, mots or less, more par:tcularly described in Exhibit •A• attached hereto and made A pest h0raofE and N3EREAS, the COUNTY has determined to sell to the CITY 7.58 &crag of the property described it Exhibit "A" to be used by the CITY fox the developmsnt of a city project for a comprehensive Civic Center described more specifically in Exhibit •B" attached hereto and made a part harerf (-SITE-); and MEREAS, the COUNTY with -the concurrence ct the C17Y is Of the opinion that the 817E should be developal as a part of the compreheroi•e Civic Center of the CITY by tie aon0trueLi:m of certain public facilities such as a City Hall, Police Building, and Cultun•1 Canter, together with parking facilities, walks, and other appurtenant facilities as contemplated by this Agreement. NON, TUEREFORB, in consideration of the $919,323.55, plus costs in excess of direct land costts,nand the perfocna=c of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: SFCTION 1. Premiseu. The COUNTY hereby agrees to 0011 and the CITY hereby subject "Wbenytconditions,u reservations, exception$ andErights-cf -, way w.lich may be of record, eftar review by CITY an set forth below. The pares hereto each acknowledge that acquisition by the COUNTY of the real property described in Exhibit "A" is a condition precedant to the obligation of the COUNTY to sell the SITE to the CITY. S8l.7ION 2. an,arshipE Possession. The COUNTY Covenants that it intends to become the owner of the real property described in Exhibit wA" hereof and the COUNTY -1- shall mall to the °rlbsd is lbchibit A+ SP aor,s, plan or sinus the total acr,ago 8 =—=I0M 3• Purcha,a Price a� The COUNTY agrees thod of Pa nt. Pur °1x!02 t• SCOU as lOwst° sell sold property and CITY !grass to costs to oxCe", o�D�o Pay a Cotsafor the 8I .323.SY plus COpNTy OF 8AN a shreot land rice o! 4919 an follows, T8. Payable to the of C t 4269,3233 SSi1 ion OOr Obar r Paid by Check to the be sus 15, 1982 iaaaSoontc19S3. I! CITY falls YaatO a� vasand I a� order ad On or payablr3lroaPC21°•YCo is in excess f dins iIL Paid o th check, to before t,ction and shall be naont of secured t4mc stB pprr County Treasurer s ce �•ra Department from Inds deposited' with be by CUCAMONaA. A Collector or COUt7Ty thon to receipt for giv,n by COUNTY OP RANCHO che Provide M UNTY to CZTY followingx�bjls Thsse costs ,hall ino uat to the p1'OParty so convoyed. Peas, Brokers gal Pees, n and , of Title, cost.. Insurance, Escrow but not be s Cocmii,sio ij Title, TSLIe Ins ran a ,d for the costs, the1al in detcrmining said coats in 1, uco to PrC, ate ahmrh o! at ^uch coats sha2el ces of direct land credit tte"j� +Onincor the CITY h-COUN aggregate cvio caster •� r�tbl'eM,ONTy CITY in connection pro rata share u! ! this sZervxco,datix c° edad b CITY f fd) with said ac tCcc,+n Arablle cos aA. as t giving Of IeTIi, °da °DO °1411 tax s ndOasse sments acquisition o! th• SITZ tax lawe°Peretion thereof or CITY,m interest Y nature cev*' the CS therein or upon ver TY s obligation tuxderyuPon �e SECTION 1. applicable �� Title Incur ante, �n1 Preliminar Title Re rt. standard Escrow holder escrow has barn opened as a Prinsurance as a° procure C1TA form nee o e a n Drerequisite to oon a Possible artar Insuring title in CITY, -z- 1 fuIssued ll araoy title inanrance UAt Of leat�rred pros ➢archers acceptable to both to the followt ehar0 by C7,TY od Costs ha!r aryl CITY. 1. the 4 °On) Onar the SITE, end shows to sub - (3) eon and and special taxes Act atrtctione whlcli2) 61Oh reccty ad Dove Yet delinquent, way, ght erSat theraonr na ts' condltlonr Y rights of f3) Any "On*, ' and ra- axtat against t'tie,dpnitreesd�� a or,condltions• rights of Review of Pr by CITY ar provided which elght and _ C2 ellelnar T111 -co =. below. olP n eitemdthar arepo t py t � therein evi" the title report d eia P ± approval theerr shall °ng b u�at,,,: YXa! after COUNTYrsha�� title ra IA the •vestacec! to the rra�cepted pt the close of ION r Lr �ffor sar° c,,,acrefs. eed t [t ad �� 1' SECT • COU ! eths atoA y e Prop ) mbar 15, 1Ps 8r oper a'1090 days owing a ce I r COUNTY othe agents ante aer d aban esc uiotn u "a aces ° ute not Vetere • this Whore onei Ic ble referred at°aanddcad, 4 � sdof °thlalentrtotPenCLhe %gra Parties h�ant shall co =°rpconflictaI andato thesait e"row°!ns This ant th, agrecds tethe lose of applSceb,fesp ct sal=t In 1 t 8 Agree- that sECy�IO is Of the ecasnce of .Zt is each sPea fically f this A4 �a he N 6. Tes e= of Escrow ani Cod every ProvisloA� adder. Providing This escrow rha`. ndltSona for Extensions a4fterlth A 6 IfUnot,has acquirede tholate than Janus )�!¢ the COUNTY has acquired the said real property described T possible • as artv -3- ' "tea of •ao� shall Promlu —� olola or an e Oct y by the Parties eacr guall tc C2Tr Xs o• of "Moment le fa f any shall by tha per' Taxes and after Pay as otb• cloaca Oa shall be Paid by the the zL"CTION 7. Oafaulp g 23.33 and costs loCp�Y trasTY Brice Pr 'h° want �rQhuar of °aptly Mh CITY fa CITY, co17p_ry°pPt1Y t0 M an the ssas shall 8 to Make an �_ d°sandie the rights° srecIfIcaalll°nset orayrsd � ther@j the purchase P oCITY notices given to Y enforce tbl• Athereini sP°citied or other it under ?Data aCdroas oa8077 p8�0 CCUCAMOHGGA 1 aaY be aKl :A 3(a)�gtrvlc to in•da CITY sal, Indic" age, calll 1 9320�easell rOd mati' at SECTION 8. Dafaul bwriting to a 0• or XOad, unit C, Other terms of it CO,Y is Seller .. torsMan this contra's CITr shall con a the of r with au'�h demand the Cou Service right dance k in Calif nla °Paoiflc par. the ln4 to CZ.04 ortanny office 11157 p,aad• by r• SECTIp 9. Anal uch other rddr�cs tha COp SA•a" tanardi oa CZTY V, This nmant, 4 requontthoot athe cone ant Of hall not be do its by the oeh party .2 he sathat ""on to assig nabb we ai bad, n°� or after SECTION 10. gnment In factrI aIlaPProvel the address pro rtY haaZbeand COp�q aditlnn or Premla�y, ovad• given manta cn held to M de and that that Ments vritl� or epairs sea, Orntot reapectin the �plp�nspeetlon of 4 and attached nto s eaco�'°�antmea �tor alt tion of their in ahi4na SECTION 11. ea made 4 Part °f atghrle eat re to d a SmPr Improve, sea, contracts oA la in ed Purpose ihMd for •such use the land Purchased Purpose• as may be in idental hereto. IOM 12 Motioes. All notices statements, dsmanls, raqumots, consents, Or designations hereunder bj eitherspartye� e,Othhr shall be is party,Qif sentaby United�Stateslregist' red mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addreosod as follows' i»UMTY or SM SZONAMIMo Couxry ACKINISTRATIRE OPFICI 157 Mast Fifth Street San Mornardinor CA 92415 CITY OF RAMC1l0 COCAMON" City fall, 9320 Semolina Road, Unit C Post Office Sou 307 Rancho Cucamngs, CA 91730 SECTION 13 Partial Znvalidim- If any one or mwre of terms, Provisions, Promises, covenants or conditions of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall to any extent be adjudged invalid, un- enforceabla, void or voidable for any reason whatsoever by a Court or competent Jurisdiction each and all Of the remaining terms, Pro- visions, promises, covenants and conditions ions oof th�uA�:wnt, a not the application thereof to other pe be aftected thereby, and shall be valid and enforceable to the full- est extent permitted by law. SECTIOY 14. AttorneyS rest. If suit is brought hereon, whether settled or pursued to final judVment, or if any attorney is employed and m'spenseu are incurred to compel performance pf this Agreement, or any apoortion fees as Agreement result of any actionororeprocaeding, including appeals or further litigation thereon. As used in this contract, Attorneys Pees ralera to lull costs of any and all legal services perforwed and caL:ulntad on the basis of usual lees charged by attorneys performing theme services and not Limited to raasonabla lsu, as defined in any statute or ruling of the court, Including but not limiteel to Rule 402, Sectl)n 1 of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Chapter %I of the San Ser"rdino County Cuperior Court Rules re Counsel. Fees, Rule 1112.1. -5- • F 0 i{ .rr.• •. t2. -tea.,. t r• 'Wr yR. �+ th r tub' � to 9.t! b k•r•t° affix to as t ;the �a � loci �Pr°D•ris rate .b°►s I'ritts,t° r.7TXBTt city c1�� of Rancho C°f u�a t_"' e Of County ao APFROyZV %e 2,0 Foam, Bra �autC`LY co- °acR�� CoottY of �Y Counsel Bor,M1no ClOrofAAjpcXo =' CO ��°4f"'+►�t' cafe MA coua 'nt•tr�rQtn° % o- San av* offlce V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Cuca .I MEMORANDUM' I s r.am \I November 13, 1981 i TO: The City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Assistant City Managercf- SUBJECT: Presentation of Alternatives for Development of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Master Plan I As you Pre already aware, the City staff has been working with the Crdnty and their architects to develop an alternative to the ori,inally submitted muster plan scheme. Attached are both aiternatives (labeled Scheme I and Scheme I1). Scheme I is a revision of the original proposal submitted to the City Council arlier this year. Scheme It is a second alternative which e addresses most of staffs' concerns rela,:ing to the originally submitted master plan (Scheme 1). Both alternatives will he presented at the City Council's regularly scheduled meeting of November 18, 1981 by H.O.K. and N.H.L. Architects. As part of their presentation, the Architects will outline the evolution of these two alternatives and the merits of each scheme. The objective of this presentation is to arrivs at a consensus of the most appropriate scheme for the master plan and receive staff authorization to continue development of Council's preferred alternative. JR /vz Enclosures i •r 176 k { Alternatives -- Civic Ctr. Hester Plum Page TWO Noveiber 13, 1981 + CIVIC CENTER ASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES • SCHEME I I. Provides a central Courtyard surrounded by accessible Cruates 2. aCesingular "didentitytannsite with City Hall and Cultural Center part of a large Courtyard complex. 3. Joint development of a Courtyard would provide the City with infrastructure vas probably Could not afford to develop ourselves. SCHME II 1. Creates separate identity and 'City` Courtyard scheme. 2. Provides Haven Avenue exposure and reduces "sea" of parking adjacent to Haven Avenu3. 3. Provides City Hall and Cultural Center with more accessible and "City` oriented parking. Under Scheme I, City Hall users 4. Proovides Improved9trafficicirculationkand with longer access road off of Civic Center Drive, there +s better stacking (more time for drivers to orient themselves to the site, the 5. Separationefbrom CountynCcurt cessible tt,o "satellites' City Courtyard/County Courtyard improves transition of the scale of the buildings. City buildings are proposed two stories and County buildings approximately five stories. 6. Provides more flexibility to the City for long -range planning in development of its portion of the site. Being part of a large Courtyard scheme would limit the City's future alter- natives. 7. Scheme II allows the City to move in development of its portion Of the Civic Center at Its own pace. 8. Provides improved pedestrian circulation for City Hall clients accessible 9. vesentsia9moremsuburban thimeiand. less of a highly urbanized theme with the Joint Courtyard in Scheme I. • Both Schemes would provide 300 parking spaces allocated fc- City Hall and Cultural Center uses and development of a separate City Police Facility. r v yh i ki / 7,� It- �s - 3 , .1 yN 3 11 n -r_ 5 ' e Y 3 d •� /7-3 T v 3 h CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT February 2, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Flanager RE: Proposed West Valley Law And Justice Center /Havc., Avenue/ Civic Center Drive BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino have entered into an agreement to jointly purchase a 25.5 acre site located near the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard, and Haven Avenue for the purpose of developing a Civic Center/ Law d Justice Center. The City's share of the site is 8.5 acres and could accommodate a 60,000 square foot City Hall, a 30,000 square foot Cultural Center, a 30,000 square foot police facility and appropriate parking, courtyard and landscaping. The County will initially construct a Court facility of some 220,000 square feet and eventually a pre -trial detention center on their portion of the site. The attached memo of November 13, 1981 outlines the two pre- liminary site plans submitted to the Clty Council. The City Council ultimately selected the se:ond alternative for reasons stated in that roport. OBJECTIVE: The County's architects responsible for the design and development of the West Valley Lew and Justice Center will be making a pre- sentation to the Planning Commission outlining their progress to date and in essence presenting the protect for your review and comment. In reality, the City of Rancho C•camonga has no legal authority in terms of design review or development criteria: how- ever this presentation will provids an opportunity for the Planning /7S1 Continued..... ITEM J SJ a ti iM `• West Valley Lad and Justice Center February 2, 1982 Page Two Commission to "critique" the proposed Court fanlltr and evaluate its eerits. The County, as are school districts, is exempt under i- State law from loco, building regulations and as such are also rs exempt from the design review process. Ultimately, if the Planning Commission feels that thare ara some serious deficiences or areas ' for improvement that should be considered, the City :ounctt can hopefully resolve them through a joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors or at a staff level to insure a hocogannous proJact that will complement both the City and the County. Should you have any specific questions regarding the Civic Center West Valley Law and Justice center prior to the presentation of ebruary lu, 14dz. o ease don't hesitate to g(vs me s call. JHR/vz Enclosure /Z5� t+ , a j y, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Marie R. I,rtuer, Adainist:ative Analyst SUBJECT: APPRG74L OF COBTaACT-FOIL OFFICE 52ACE Attached is a copy of a otaodard lease with A. R. Reiter Development for the use of additional office space necessary to accommodate increasing servile levels. The space in quer•ion is located at 9330 Ease Line Road, Suite 101 (two story building). Funds for the added office space were approved by the City Council as part of the 1986 -87 budget. It is necaesar7 for the City Council to approve the leave agreement •e that the City my take occupancy an August 1, 1986. yECOMMENDkTIOM It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached lease agreement with A. S. Reiter Development in the owner of $1.656.00 per yewr, beginning August 1. 1986 and ending January 31, 1989. rRD MRL /dja Attached err V• Sy L 4 aammmoasi STANDARD It- JUSTRIAL LEASE t. wwt. tw lw. MN aN tY•n.0 o�tvetb Pn _ la H4_. wor w a.aa+CI A A. RECTOR UCAMONGAENT CO)¢A 'Y I.gN,WyZ�gy. a„a _CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA m > 1qa >t rY+. rntl.q rtb•l.b. Ybaaa Thirty (70) 1 tha �nita �ymYn+.i fpMwnb q.11986 q,tq,a�e, January al. 1999 4 flwl It MRLMI•fN /yrbl•W YMIMNhYWIgNyWipryµ•<I1J 51 �`G�YRL(!PN 1�! pbr•M' wnrq. btq arut l•sw ra•on l••ts.PPMtt•o!•q anwla 1.GER_fln un.tN sf rar ...rh tM.btwograr.y wrwlwr.Pawawwrw.ra N•sswrq•rw+q+•�w.w«a Irrwgl.ew ranMOMCa1MaRPPwtK •Ygw.LLwY.tpwlgMlFWat101bLw >tl W g1Ywt•bW V•w Y4iAlM> q tl qOl •IIW gKyY L•V Ml Nt9atllq.tla L! II •.YA4tptlYtivegt•tlYpMPgIrP•illj PytNY/ygyglgp•pn N.gyrMlggqMl{'Y•PIMe�R1 uPUP q rM IrM• Ilb s4wMwvW OPOY tt�Yryq saN W Ms VM F M Wa 01 K/M!N T! bggp t•�P IR MaVnt l YN et bN A r•rW bYMaMt mgol.aYnW -W ... �4^-6 �YtlYNgMava•w l! LYYa• wrrTY�l••• NtMtltwMIMPNfPdtgM4 .MY•pMO4tlMNS4.q�G•.Mbf•ryYga vMf4bkTVU p4CH AwwwYVP•gMKMINV VNnMgNbn Mg4WiN hv.W l•Iw PP V wiV M..N W pvt rb.W1PY•YVtltlblvattNbOYY.•tlt PaNMVf1 v.t411YYl IPCbY6q•PP Wqq 2r.ObtvA• WbgNi FMWa 1".3 O YtltY ' r f. 1.w1 ♦ wu.rrl. • ' w N.a.ewnlsN Pmncn arwg4N)IIN.Nw.ruw u.w,N.aN+.».waN.PF•LW1rn Ian...Mr» Ynryeq{MMr�NI„w YnFTl Yn. n»» r�. ypMnl. Y.anMMNIrNO.MQTINM.r.M»+INPr».ry .Y arYneL.». n. ,gwq..�NNMa.bMN+>wrrblr>rpyYwwp Nn+rvN.NOVd.>v.Y,y..p„YiW r "wV •IYIW.N W M.Nwt41MN.r.M.IrNMIIbKYO. T. WMr.In.NTIY.wPryTMw1 W�^ L.WN VYYMIMr W >T.bt.M .MwN MNINw4Wpm♦ nWY. Y�iaMMlwa .ltw.e..aMY.N.4NwY.NYwpbNMLw.N 1 ii. N•pNwwrNq.w(. w.wl<INrnrYNMONfwN ryn rnN. npY111lNV I.w+N YNN.YNN W Lw. NYw r LW IrVeb »I.N F.nyl na/r rIN NN.tP W 1.p1/ �l n• 11LNW MbpH> w\ .wlgllNiMNWrtlgr.Nar.p /IIIYlrnnq UYY.MgMN{W NIrIy11p1M.. 11Pb/L NrpIN1 »,NI.nNUY» W MMY/Ywpp%YN. )' NNfV Wn»t W NLy WNrwaW �nIr.11N >q1q N NNgrineV M`w1..r.ryls YI. N Ys W pry.a. w.6TtpwNq Nlr Np.M w.. a.w. Nn MW yNr..IL NaN4gNdWigwl,.r.d wJnMYYW N,TM1gl..I.I WLMr.N.rN F.nY.I. \.Ydaw �YLWpay r Ir rYq'.N)~1�wIRI r�y N1.�b�.•.IaM1Rl>WOFw Nn.wlravwNN»Miolr.)I W. iwMNNNu CaMNWLY9rNYI Wr.N.rPANY eawp. �. )i AflreYr.W W1YM "� IY I.WI rMNIrLMeIIM'II p.Y.nI1NLPW WIMIYNMYe�RrOnnM r.r.PYlrMwrINMIULNP W. FwN1vry.+w.lww.IL..MONMvwn1G0¢ON �� M MYI+•'•••yuW W>.nesL.aMIY.Nentl.YS»r NL» Y1NrI. 1. N�Yp�j »Mtl�FMINq.NNUWIw.YN>MVNNrwyn M /wL»MrgNMw..gaq N W Y'y wOM Y N N1,N tl h U11pr 4 u11J w pb n.NWI.dN...»r.NNl.nrr L4.rM lMIaY011»I>L MLn \»NNL 1�NNN�wNN.Y1WNY 1..11.iN»»Nr»aNe YNYM\p,WwINL WnW MNdylbrylynrM /Y.tY YMI�iAW w1Y.WIry1yr r M.n >ameMtYYN.rWId IN W t».swFNMlUwbrNW lMer r W .Y. q W W wwY,.LYYy NVW1w.bV YN.gII.yrY W W n.ALY1M.INMY»tN W aa.Pn>.www.Ll ,.II.Y.YpwMaNq \aMM \ N».. rY .rIMP»r \wPwwwLNnFr�YwvwIWNNwq>e W rraLLrD.ra .nM I.aMNrN.n.MIIYN ' r.0a•YINY.•WYMI� ..�NNYINKbLw»>w TIn LYY.re�..I..rawW.I We.rNYbWI W.rr[w air rw�.tl In L.rr � a h�mawwv:.N.:I F.�'Yaf � rYw.a..r.ww.., �-•.w rwe.\M wrw�ad.tln N^YYA A NMNYNW.t F U.». tl b OYV•.On. r »y Prw. n. NpYI W '• b INMYW{»p1 »MYYYw. rYLgp NrryYNM.IN Yb..YM.NLTMp»MPIr LNY.Yabwn Nd.,n... Y.•1ywlNrMb..YYa.FYImL1'rt. rnY>YY,..w. N..yrb Nl F.rn»Ir W.YMNrwnUw NbtllrMLwOW I»gAeMre.pr W mLn>Y.rintllr)MnMhMn4 W IMwYW N»Mrpr.IN Nw....wrwlv4nenNMlw �� Yder..10FM pLrYIrW wrwlNLrgnrN w1Yya W I.dr W qIP M G.na.,eNnuwa,.Lrrrw N`Nre IW YIL W LMn.p.wNNY.y W w...p.ygwgf W »nryM,yNp..FY» MWa•MMLVfMNn.Ir »py.NMYnN fBbgNMIIIRN. r. n>. L .M.IIIYNw.1rYUYP.IYNNYbI.y.YpyN l.wnNra/ywryYW WwW1.MMMMyY.W NNIrgMYnnMWpWNrylrbrYlyy.ylp ` N LwY W aMw.wNawM.N11a.9bbOMMns.l w. hwMll.O rlrOiw YSY,wN Wr..Ir MNM. L»...bAI.W.MNI... LN fnuwN.pLgbyw MYrrbnitl»r W.y.y.aybb W INMNb» IInW�; rdNW .LM.raPYN.I1bNwrYMNN)]IILYNNN>r wrMw.Y..yyN. <i M.Y W »M' WYaLiVn .slwYr.4w mvvNYW bM MIIYYLw.NNINnL »N NFI.»IL MYNm..M>»I,Nr rwnreNwMYNr.yre Y.ww.r.tlN.N•rrdM1rTw..IMr,ry .s �Lrw. wtMrYW.Vn.a.rilOrlllu N.rerygaMlYyW /i MrCI�YNU»rNM.» »rMa<Mn.INr.wW M>y Y.Ie.b MM..ILrYL rYW MPKYbr UYrwWMYr.lynl " FINMIN1.aNhgNYNNghl. )]b . W ur L Yrler. rewLa. Ll lY. r1l lNNw.a.�lrw»rrlrUY»'IIU.MNYwW N»nb' Mq NrmMhLr»sNr�1Y. rM urcut >' yWLC„n�,py u M�®M�N1sL�N:p.. iroaw M�.,wI..NY�>.Y�iM1M�.w LpprrG �„M�p1JM.YW"r,'r"'^rC � rewt).ur.er.M �w ewar r.rnl.00nmemlopyNlw,.sn.,arlr b s.Lrr »rY.ww>rNNnw.YU. eltf wWLIW wMINNM.NFUYI1dM WiINfNNTP .aThrlQrrFL MYYLM WrprW. WIMhYrr.G �� INWN+NI �rwv�Yw.r N�wusMriwriLii w wuw�ow.�w d.��rrw�iN siN b�wNi»�is�a 1 l..i,MC1 M>»crwNrl W.wYr.alYr IN.,LIAYIwN,M W. Nrwnwpwblw .a>Nam>rprrlrn.wY>LrLLY. WwtgNwe MrN.wlq.al.rw MNrlMwyeF."M..M]INIL4w .1• ,IINLL NrwNr. wlwwlrlr.M.NNId N�Nrr.wNrwNNNwNItlN L4l...I.IM1..YVIW W.YYYIYYYN.tlnW.»FIIY Mrn.6NM»r >P.TNYNY ✓MgWMMNNwVpnrgywaWrwYaN y »InpM r.r NLYw.rr.N l.iw.tll Y U[ lM.»MYM rIMIN ~"L. NOY.MYN.>YINnw MYM.YNMNM.w/4rWw t} II»wr Y.rw. ' lYl»YIYW YrWLppYq »MrNMngMI.W...la)r..It�tlNMVp WnbN.A � pYd.Wn� r.NYNM.IwMbNplwMlanaMltlWM tl.1111YM.ryrdMNNNW.p.wMlhnt ( w.10 (Y /W MMr![aYN w1IYL Y.Y.%Law L.Yp »••rY.MfMnNCM1Y 1wt.iYlbnN1..,Y aaraarnW NY )riwr.vabwr.wN+nb.owL•rw.N�rw� NNn4er.Mw WrvrNL»r1 WwMwP/aW.YMYIMhnW MIrRaYY rlaYlblrrYn .wYb.YY.:nmwrYirl»YNY»I gYYrbrNlMbwNNwnseLwy tirr .gWM.N»MYW.p. MNU. IYNWrPNI>Nwn3)�WrrwMr'NY..Y.yWM MaMYb.WMMMY1wNNwN.01r• IYN *nCYw N HLaI »�� » ~IM>'w'l>w YYNNN.pIrM.rY.alw»V W d.>1r..rbM1Mwr�r.vwwl.r Y.N�W *IrY.Nw. pYwwyMrl....rnrY.wraM W.Ir.N.IA.w >YY.r NR4./ >.NIr/M1 M•M INW WIe In MarlwY.N>Fy..Y�M N.wYYNN h.wnl.NnLw1 .ron)Wn M1wW MNhrww»Mw nnYC.wNNN'YIaNMh.'>Y•W M�fW...1.. >. b..rwW.n ., w.. Yr[ M..IwWrn.l.rMY,wl,ryNYVyMIC7yrW wrMF>w.LM1rYIL bNM.w.w l>N/r> F.>N.Ni».nFNNLeY.NN.rMP LrM.aNW ww l�IpN.ylYNnlewpMMMwpIN.y�wN�r. q YN>rww»IL»V rw)ITw>.MILI.YRp>ae.r1Y.LM WNrNMYwlowayb..Wr MNgYYN W>w MN.rMNn »»»FN.O rM�rYdrlaNrWNaM1N1Y ('r.nMNffa.yY W.NM1 N L.r. w.FMFasrwY.bry\rIWPwNn IOYNMNYYIFU»»d.agr NwYw1.YYLnYyr ww.t�s h..wwr4law ~Il.l.r.ln MY...»r.W .OW.rM\W ��rW N.O.Ywrh� � rMn1YNi/ YNe YNYNrTN1YY .RYIILL.M.prynYbl.NM.gYW..tl al N.PpOMM.ywa,(wrr/Ww YYyrlwrNrwgaY.NYNIMryen rrhYarrllyhM(aNtl MLNwr.Yb M> \IIWIIM MTIY oYNW WMYMAwrw. v. wMLY.» N. NNI/ sr. NMY..w\nlFrb.4Lr.r..ewefrawNlrl MM NIMr..» wY h. wYl/ L>. pMM>.ILrY.r.trFbLYS.gwbMAyp�NNw YYYrf FIWOIw raMrNYVr »NWbnbnYNYn.rNI.rMYwyb>r[LMV .CI14rwa MNMNYpf N/Nw.YY •'- ai WV..»_IY.Ya N1YIMNNd.. YNebMFUYwNr. Nt lN.lrwNn»w..ylLwlynypy4yrµ.ynlq YN WMMYIprnMNW rraNMNIL W»yF( »Ir�N MNMrY9Y�py1rO1N LVNn1.YripriYlYYK.>»N {' �rrr rY[b my.NOIDY+Y» Mr Y wNfw Nw.'rw.sArNrr ae+ara�. rr». «rl.rd.r.»r»rw r..self NY.wrn....NwwM1.rrr LI N..rwY.wvpYNN ..rww W.r.ww rYe..MYb. L..r YrIN NM. r M.wr•w IYNNNwdsron rew NNYSrb)w ww . oY) rrrrrnwwrrrwablw. ar.ru. >rrwrN.wyrarrrrelrrarylLa a Nw wrwrnNr.rtr. Wl>•r.rY�aNIlnLlelrY•rr M[r.rw1 rMln Nlb»IVnYllrwl,iNwr.r•L..Yr' 4n. N1YNb� �N.rYwWY MMiYYe • MPr' NNrl nr YrnSlFl1 »InMwelrr.rlM..>YLM�IYw. M MY.•»rrMMYN hr.a»I1L). ��( tirr�rraW.rwlal.rNYlwwMlr.NYW MnMM /rwr.NLYNNrN[.nPYNLI.»%gFMLM»F rwMYa.»..rbr'I WMdNWNF RYYiL...M1Y>W MrNN11 a Nyr.NrrN YVa r LIML W Llrw r,»aw.wa N N)IY✓NN rNMMM YNYnY..nPr MYeWYL W.LI.nMYN110NM. MwwrNwrYrN+1»rlllw»LFY>Nf W» ypN ..YNMgYIaNrnpgUM.rMMNMwIMIW1..4 rMF.w...FI.I..aM.r..ufpw.Y»rr Mwp[IY.n>.YIMY'V.w Yr.IrN Wwrl.»YMU>e.r.WNNp(NIb.Y Y I..INYw...NY1..raM.». N/PW(W 0.»I....LMYKq.v. W.IyN r n411. YlI a• I / �� . a..,.r� hi`owr.ww�w.+w�ea rw.m.�wr.ww a..ev.IwpiwlWWwraarrbwrr . nrrr...na to �.Ill.wlr>'ra w+rrnh b.br.htra ++r.nuprbrra a tsrw.wrwaer.wnrruwrr.ro . ravY . rir . rr..w �blwrhrtr.marr.rhrn....rr".a rbaa«r.lwwwmrra�iw wrwwrw... wrwe.....rwa.nbbw . wewwar.r✓Ia..h abgr.drlra y"`ti"'"'a`wo..w l.rr. r/Y VAMI�Vr�10 rV�••M1rrM.r�.�GIWV.wr TM1.W..VrM1IV.hY...lrl [ alihb �.I.Mwrurrwvn.Yr.w..brbw h1Y..rM1atl.Y Ur.VI VO vb 11. YIRLIr+. I4MM. AYC�Yb�rVybY� .Yr.�...rtMlr.�r.YYV�.nwlbrMd. W bwMwpW)YP. Ma�M�. raN�rOrA Y.. M.M.waO.FM Ya.rwNr.Ibr.Kb IY..IrN MM �Y.w.N] V bTMpY .I>� Mb�I~ �Yr�Mq I. YIMwN. AOV�/ IaY ..U�MY.nM.InYM..4h.+i�b1.WV/V IL Yrrla>•I.�.al.ra� �11yl.I t. nr. lw.[IMIIaW.rb.rr�w�rN.Yr..errY. Vr.�a.yr W W..1Mr.KV W NMrPV btW..yw. W1MerV Vc� Yrlwwln.Y{..Nrbhr� \�aW UrV.Ib'��Mw.IMIMOIM VpnrM bY1br V......aa.ablMJ MwC W Y�rfwW W .LnbrM lw. 1L1 {wN,r.r . ab�rMM.M1�.h Or�I�� W'~+II•�FYM'�MV.1..rMw VYarM.rhre.Y'9MYPOM100Y a.s�.rr w d rr.w. na�rq.n.�.a M rt....arrrr.wwr «r.awlrwwwe.• tray +by.lw..+b.rw.wrwrb.a. «a.+s�avn wYW Mwr1. w�/.1 V.M\ • raw _�_ Il r FeN�tw. /a1wIN.wYl.ww.NY.Y. pub. WY�b. I7. bY1p .Y�JYFrtbsxtll.rvblwl.w+wnbvW� /witl tPL \rl0\L�r �nNt �nbYYMPryY1l1�W bOtoybNMlrWr WINTLYVtygwYyplNx Nw�y�� mM NM> KnParYwV br my NI IY\!w tIfOCObr YOB tW vwwY¢ li. blYilt Mwgrt Ii1 LVF1Y MOmnFV gMSMgNbFw9 NTt YYrtbWYW rMMWbt%IIgM WYFI.Mr lu TN..YW bYYNww.Yd P�F.wY.FIUW Ib TN44rFbtYrY WlMrbwMglwll Maw�b14.YNr0Ybw.YFIYNr IYrrypp yw MYnOw. r'M.Yn bn/. Pl.rbnMU. W r piO qF.w YI'. tllgrPM Nb V�wMEb11l1Yb Y LMN YMb mO � I�mAn w �aFrMbTr MYYwOUwW wrnml.r FLw�M.m�wrl.waMM.Nnnrl.rwYl MM..vd4.ItI..PYYw r.nwbw. W waswl.m.YVr.I... rw nYmcn .wc.xe.nyn.mrrs.noMw�rwr�lywaN m�.Nn.arMw..FLr..N.wFw W VYNIbbIm11YK(yMN�YYImI N7r. VYpYIYM.q m.n. Yyy p/NrN M wNM1YIPYnpYPwA 1.'.I IYNY.< YU'.FPwdMYMw4YYFLrrrL.YPrtlMtuF WLMbMYwvtYYN.nYYYnYnv.11gl �Nb. b J.Yt W M!W GMI. YM MYYn r M OMr YnYR M W m nY. r N b.nvm Yngw r ULV. IY L.YgwFww/. Ytl.Y1wW YYNIMint NnnMl YMnwY W sYy.wyIMM..NYN YW tmw W N..NT.rYeel.YrrPPw MImIY W rwypbrlrYw NnwwVPYYYW NMUYOA W �wNYYYw�IMYMIbYPYwbYYwr.Fffae yw1�W F.nyN wT.FYYba MY�M1bwM W I.wY1 YYRYF Mw.YiYYI W b bN.sY\� r M dFrn♦w Y~ YyL. w. FUwLt.NYMSMNq'.nt�WUNVYYtYytl`Y Y.YYyLWMPfA7w4 %gy.Mly bwM. F. bYL • wnFMOFlw4N. YI1YwtYtmNYwl. LYrnI�1�w.Y4.l1�.n��'ONII.WYYYb MFVn1YFlnYMwlwwYylwblNYSrYYW >wnNrnlFlW IyNywY.NryypNbyafflNYlw YYCtlF�wWIrrlMwwrw.Na Nr Nt M.MPYn.wlwrYbMVw MdRIPMYawwpvgwrwYMdW wywnwUy bbo r�Y1MY/ fYY YYtb�\ W INw M.WY warYawrFN.IrYa.brwwYYYYy1gY btowrN MMbWVnw y.y /FYN • M.YY L ��O J• � Y 10 Oalr/Ir hgl.y\I \If ew111w CY . rf Y l/.M/sV/u Mf M1/pq MYYM11.I1Px.. PClwll /ryrr.Y /IMLIW u.fM1 wNwpW /NYYIrbuNP1 NNNnlwwrplyNYnl/ .q NlpNltlYYwrOlw/I.Nn MIK /NII.Mrb Irypw/yw/Iry MYIx >YYarypfypyriy,l iM/r WIIINLNY. Y tlwNlr/a Yw MlPyrN/IRtI/NM WY pw4lWrY.1/NPW yyrp/NYwwYNnx //ry xw NYr.LP9M1 WIMrrRblw.'1.LM MYCIINMwxx'NLMdL.xPNrwwp/r 1YIL4 P K^x /NIYYNNbrplPaMarMp N1V.VPn.IMalnrgxnplhxxN >MIpwW Y�byLMafIYNrM yr Nlwwrw.r x Lec.rrll. n1.1 rw•nh r twmY INLNYrsYU.rwbrah hll.w pe./�.wmuW,Ya.m..Plw.Iwu MIwYWtPaM.ImrLwgnwrYwt/wnwrW w/"urll'LNeo WMn MII/I NMM/0 MW w UYIV. Yr'PY.IpIIYhI NIMr/ M W 1MI /qq N /Olwww MMY W ML WIFOY fYII,IW MTwY1Y /NfM/RWFYRI\YMYgW WITr �Y Mapl /IlllubhlbaPM•MrYwl.e� ltlulut nq} ppnprrr /pMlrPr.wrYYPl.dl/abuPPWOw MI /1//, s N.WNNYws(>u1\ rYf NPYIxq pra hIWINIx Nil1/.11>YIM bymlYM W dY.V/NYILwP1rM W p.WlYrryLL>r YtYpIP /a.PIw0,N0uW N]rKPIW bglrlrr.pl111 F.WMM \I P /YM W Nrwl L /�� �x ./I /4NUr[IPr.MYCIMhMY.wPMMrNrKl laYx NrggngrKM4F W/rYYpplgn MPd OIYNY /a� LNI�wYYC/1'Y W'INPaPf IMwwln w011/IV/16�OI.W WY.l11q Mb/ W OIII/tYMgIV IwMMbLI >Y/gwo/nYWNUwinLYr.wsv/bws/N WIbIW W /bhP/KS\ fIA UrML Wlmry. }Iy\wwlww✓YYtllrpwrrwrrr P.f MOwwrP Oww. YMMYnOUr1.VId MINMw >/ l./YI..wYLawIPYp WYd W I".IIIyq W nhY./Ad P>INIIdY wYRY LY PM.rOLlgg1Y/Iw N /Y11W wtlMd Fw4MUbMEP.MMO.11bldy W pq•YYpM W W r W wrgNG>YbaarlgYlu N.Y®Wm.mw.lr.11/ p•N11.WIMwdL/q /ISMMw.rpPUrllw/a YClgndV.n.Y/ILIY/InuY yydrYxOFwrx WL Oylwlll/ nlga WlhM'IUdnr//YIW MMp NW./e/IYmwsI W[/yYrYy�N yp�ll MrpYdMKw gtlelrF�phY11Mq aYllPweda WLIY /YIY41Mln/LWldu/IYwWfN<NYLY•itu NwntllamW IN NLINYx bOwplf)ILp LgMYYWYYIyM PhpCYWmrty,FeMMbWVMwaNnM wIM•wgrrd IPYy.wlYyy W xpM�� /alMllnYgw W.IIaN\W PyIFYYW Pw}rYnlLytlll` nLNW waYMLYY a.YW wlwgf YNr1YWYFKYMYM d•WII MAM 01LYM wOn FL1Aa>I MPIMN YY Wrp1.N f u >Irr �...I.1YY Y rh /I/wm totrY.laNe W r.wwrvrb/n wrllvl rY.r IU 1MMrIOwMIIW •_. MWwY11Yl/G/•rIMhIM VINYY WL�Y pPIYP1MnfP YIWYPMYIWOnPYFWYPww ^4dYYYYIYO/.NYWM'.Iw1yY//I/Mrn WNwMIkpPwMYY/gdxw w\.IYrrbYMA/lYNI1wMM/OIIOnW YMw W0111Wggm PYfw>ur IIIwbllllmrin wNxrara/Iw.wYlmw^whwl�mw�.�r OYYIwIMYrMNIwYlrrrnYlgNYq.Y/M bPwrgw rwY qb/a lshPw>IPrafr.aw, \werlrW hwrblrwahhw.wYM NwYMw'LIr W/ONYKYrNNNpb.IpIbFWH W_NrW MNL/.fY Yw4>yl JfMdelgT /FIYtlNI wNIPNrIwYrngxwq dLLNULwwwrpllYW IM>MY 4LwPb WYPw NYNrIyPYI.tML/w /�N�• nMMN W sPp.w Olgw W h/YYYV\dh Illxgyb � ~wylwlp/ywroa/ W wK'q'bY >P/\gVl dh I\/./ WN.Y>IL�IN/Y/d/IYaL >wb Ml/b1 W NNxIMrw YNYwYgYlm PrraPINSrPwmMnlYwbpLY YO/I p'Y lYY 1bII CM1 YY/ Y Lw1/ Y/Ir ldrr rl blp llYw Y NYIi b w w>s>O wr bN LIbL lw/I IM INA N NNgYt bl PPlrwYMpFSYLIN11NPr ImIw Y110YQrYlllsq! \YKNOFMMrrbiblYNL VYIIw y I+P.rnINPYdYNIwnYYYY W.Mbxwct wv/fvnrp/sOFIYYt WIrM/Y.sutMPMYLbla1//rn W L WINYAwYYIFYNpIbulew W YL1Y.YbOYyLt Lt McIr FwCIrN\MPIfILwpFlpv MrrYlWy Y rMM IIwIw.IWWMKx41WwId2/>D Ie'baluvlwwmellwL ww M1LO.s FINI'�dl'I vr�� La P\�M °"YahlPpTy IwryUN W NPYnawrLMrL.rdY.\.NaPV wPY L.... NM..w qwq. rYrdl. q. NraMrYSrww .\n+gr.YlwYLxvMnYrwenoYar� •nr.alwnrWr ww.rhYLIrLr FYNMrIr WwYMI.MpLeIYIYIYNPr WPmYynlgNl\M�aYnw�Yn�MM Ow M > h OrgLw/IY w w'.IL h hMUq rIYV1Pl lIN //Ir y Y s' V I M LY/L NLy P tl.Y /PyY Iyy1 F Rrp N'N>6: �bY lYrrP F\ek41dML /Wnq^.On YMrFOwOwI PIdi111empFPY1/4M IN4WIOwn M.YW/NYMrWNYxbbLMINM<.ulYfgwYW WYnYOgIINMIwYYMYfvMWW xl\WIIPnYdWWYpp YIPwNP. III /YY'IW IYIwMrgUYVahefwwANJYb/.NKN' MdhNbllr >pryLrnrlw.YnYOPr MN/ InnKbbWePYNSI / /yr/rlrxPlrbNYwWwp/YMpy W1 Lw MNY Ngdb ~MO Y>YYYf//YbrI WrYIx I/w1. � NnirYW /KrIr YFmc1/ 1 >/Ibr1n Y>owlwN 0°O°N'°glwregbwu C>rMrrllrvwq tU NY.P< Illwwnlwsr FlwYlw NgrgY MiMN/ww>rd FICW vpYbIMNd YIFYb4NN ym'gdWwrlmYgb Ir /yldrslNPl4we//mlMYbsmvwddFMww NIWlYwgblwlw PwYlr/ryP1 FLYIOIrIYMnIMYwiNYgIWOaNYNnPWrnIIYSPUIOWIwN WOWNY.C\n11./I /d .d FPMYx FYV ItIbM M441dLItls YpxMy ./pypNYeYlwpYy rlp.ly/.Yd Lwh+L u YYp/ r Yel YK,.YY Plgl r M nr aWYKw d wul pp ta10 tYwIwIL WYII /y IlYls >MwYTV L/rd.db>rgnyYYl W wWr MWI•IwKbw'WwYMgrblw/bNN �Ylbb� Wll.'].NIrMOY/f. YN\YYW.WYYw/b ILtI MIyyO.Y. OYYpLIpYNhKw.rpna W INY./ IYFMhprYrfh/I�.NnrMY�CrIYYyle/M YP//rY0 /n � /WgOi/NIM�NYI�MI gpIYN1�NM fY.IYYIIYW wh/bld 1pOYdMYYI�Y�YIiry IMYda Yldb Yfh>LYYMInbM!\ h lYlbrN.Ka W WIPYdh WNwlawYNl.NrYYf W Nqw Y>/I/YOIYpYYPM1Nm'1lrM WYpM/rY.r .IYKFLOpb PwwwLVY 4lFYYw\Yb L1F NCY.'P'Obl/I{MrIIw✓YY/P'9M Yen M1rn YYnlnw iLli prMrL wYL.. MPYIYwIpIMeMOWpgrx .IllYwNYlrlwwd >rwValY(tllrYy Nwl.yw.>w W wrL1�IYIIIrerLNYMbwwYrl Lr�'mrww Ml W rgIw MNOwrbsYUYYOYLbrwwllYmnKIF °w�r'f`^p ^w01O I'1>I^/IYPnnabMLwwvfrYr MYY Y�101 bp1YY Nxa1MY Uq]/ W W M I M.I rs YW Y h IW W Pxrm r l��Y W IYM W eNarF�IrchrNPWIr.1Y11wp.IPbNr W FYVN41dhn/Mb W Kq[IMl WM(wgMu 'M'w0i1 Gxwq"Ir MprW MSwYNww�y�y.IWlay NNYinIOb >YhwYedFdYVLYKIpI�i Y\. YMYW >[wbwllnLwY.WMIIwr/ryrhLwMY4YggY Mlrq ^Yr WrNYYYrIY Ix/I Y01 r FwY/n.M41w.lYwPPrrlww IM.x/PYxsauwraYAnLbIW W/evaw d \� 4wr w Clw.a wa Pw\el r IN LYq PaPYr./ A Lww ./r r YMr aeh I mq,.n w tats �Mie>CY/IC IsrYrL... La.d aFP wwbNgrNYIYIN.Yw.«.PYHa1.YaL.... W.w.d m W h MN M/ OYLPb 0 OgrnrllM I�in W Mtl/ dCrldnYYIN gp>YrYOwL.IV W/rI W I11YN tlq levl rN! M MIS LILULYYYrIL ~ Im MLtgLtl 1lp b dYIW YOpypYbFiw/plrw WwKa.,yIrM VFM.npOiYOalbxyn Y�III LN.wryrw41h11/wY4NIW\r r}` NYIrWYNµIYIwI.IwW YVf/h/IIJMNM �m19 YIdrYbbbpn llw / /IpNNPM roN/.x/.rh111/IIII/� Lr"LI pMjlpl�jr F ii. MYi[ //Ym MYYl1//I /MMtV NN W lbY.1 W xMIYtli NwxYFrYgIIW.MMIq IMYw ,/Pr>II >'/I.IIYb10NxlIb wP/0/Y/L.�YPILrMW IwJr11Y.aMJm Nglbllb � /Yb4MMrq M/4 W YMPPPwIY1N W MYVgwmNILYU WIWINIWMx.ltlxwIYMMMrIrV 4MOIPPb/MMN V PntYpa/I/YUnYpwnrhY W/Y• PrpOrYlr Mf/px1MNYNdMYPI01pL YPlrMrwp .NfrLYwh . rA rYJ11u0ryifrK NYPx b YrprN1 RI 11w14Y/I bYM..YY • YMMY KII IW VMM r Y NY Oq Uw FL> N W W Y YIS YrgNasrwllww I �/ P1.Yr__ 7 S Mo- , CVIy n V w WE fat. tl.r• n.f...+rrr.ox.rv+. vdwfr ..wi....s.w,a�vr.4.wnd..w..W14i M I�NNM♦bwW d�l�.b'.�MbW MaPI .uY1KW94ssa.l.wrtfaWtM�.YYUI�b.O Yf/Ytl Vib I1wm. Y..14Y�yp� flfY.ylYb+Ill..l.MrW Md.. f1441W W6I fYYMw.M rrMSVMMtl wM Y�MbMa.w. YlW MbrW+.YSW {.MrbMl. lw d. Vrytlti/.wW 11d Mq f.flff.f+MM.4M.nb IY (wVb.IVYwMtlMUMpMY14s MiM Mr•.pL.f.YV bIMw WV MfrbMfll W fai0 tflblW Ilit OdMhr•Mb� ww1.......1.Kw..b R�bbAV M4MV W.YYV fN V44ib.f d W erv.nfMm. TYn W/wbay. VrlbW'fM4MgYrM WIW VMMb�V+tLb..Md M..yf+MY.wawdwR.wb. brM .+YtWa`MYrldbMtl ? rMwlwbdwaUWb.r Vaw.rVOldf+abM4i4MYW' lrr - 5 e xrva =•.y�' y- w t Y \,w.i4, M wn V.Y., Lw\ yMrul Ow�wwA OVwrwwwn MA+IYw�IwO\Y w l WOY�Mi�r,\ W wy,lt q /,awYyWMTYr,IIbwRM,w\wY1,K IY hf V\ \IMewY WI,/MMV1)MYIM IIi.Y Ib I,P/rw\ w\Mr W kI MrIMeM, MMI\ wY1CYYlM/ w[9l\'WY\IUOCW\WUM�WYwVy�\rMMww J,rCMCc4 ,. OYYY ]sI\ W IAY nW V\ 41w\ MMM�v1wMm \w\1M�V,�f,M1�O9\aMaYMYµ\V nLa,l,by,<O W,IwTwMIw TrM• wrbM W1YYT, V wMrb\ITb, w� Wo�wYw \M,ne/w\a,v��wp \wMFw�nlwAM w,o /aYMnwW YN�MIt} /D w M YM M\EY Y tbn M Mw\w, ! M w\ d/M! \IM \w \,YeYY1 W,w/ \fwwlrw W\�IYWMI\,1LY ii11MYYe/ \M\IW tMAt1M \\w\Y.W, bs..raawrw.rb,\,.+w T.YOaM\Ma\YtlMbn Mwblrrr\w,YM waasl W wwwYrb W1,Y►F4 Tw\UgMw/Iw r.,r w. oreral\r Mn,lwuwer bTr \\� IbA/W bRyM,l�bgYy Kt\\\\r M/bMA M�IWLL YI�WwLY)y\MbI1wY,wRW �11M c„w„sw Costs Tess, Cal TPorofs_ A.N. REITER DEVELOPHENT CWkN[ a _ w u6wc H. Reiter. tiL iwev _P.O, 60: 7250 q Nm"grr leech, CA 92656 -7250 yt Craw r fa, AYw r.O. Po: 601 _ Ru. -ho CYtsrones. CA 91770 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONOA M -- N 1 r t I 1 i� II II WF = pmry pO� O M O • pp it • F v O 1" r Y b M W p tl r Y Q a G EW - - Of• Y � O YO Y• Yo u� r ro $ M a O M N u L MBli U ICJ �j pa" 1atx 1 4� u ti. aye , I` I ,I. �i a r I 1Q/ e 1 SENT A Pa" 2o!3 -ta *!l o F- -0 t 1 I wnu �• s,'