Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986/08/20 - Agenda Packet - RDA & CC
n e V''4 7.J� n • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;r' q� A iW.lea D. dllk•4 C►wInJ. B.ywtll A&"Kft Rleawd 3l.O,Y Pw•l,J. %rtd6 QU='�W,'L R- LR3Ad7ICI27 TRIS IS TO CIRT'IFT that t:m microphotographs appearing on this FLIrYils ate tree, accurate and ewplete reproductions of the re- cords of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a mauicipel coporation, as delivered to and in custody and cu..trLl of the City Clerk. It is further certified that the micro;Aotoaraphtc processes were accomplishad is a ma amr acd on file- which meets with the require- Wants of the National Amen of Standards for permanent microphotographic copy. Date photographed; Camora Operator: ./,li n/• / /,J� �J City Clarks, � i [5e2Z,9,4 ROAD. SUM C • POST OVnCC R02 997 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91736 1, I S a' I N m QTY OF RANCHO C )CM9Oncn REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA Lions park Cocounity Center 9161 Ease Line goad Rancho Cucamongs. California ' ADguat 20. 1966 - 7200 e.a. 1. Roll Call: Mikels _, Buquet , King Dahl _, and Wright _. L CORBYT CILYDRD She follodag Consent Calendar itew are expected to be routine and we- controversial. They will bo acted upon by t]e RW at one time without discussion. Hong SUBMITTED DOME SUBMITTED 1�[6L�i /YS . r.nn' •n nn', e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOi REDEVELOPMENT AGENC' STAFF REPORT I DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: Chairmsn and Members of the Redevelopment Agenc/ FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Deputy Executive Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PROPOSED RENOOT TO F -VTNILLB BACKGROUND: On October 16, 198F the Redevelopment Agency approved a contract truckc e0ue Fire ladder District identified t the need for expanding one of its existing facilities in order to house and maintain the aerial ladder truck. The most cost effective method 1s to house the truck at dueptoeitsatpronxj located on San industrial area. Read ut west f Achibald. March 5, '986, the Agency approved a preliminary budget allocation from Fund 25 - Fire Protection Fund for the construction and nayinent of the fire station expansion and design, fees. EVALUATION: The design of the station rumodel has been completed by the bTs—t—rTc The majority of the proposed remodel and site wo co consists of adding an additional 1800 square feet to the westerly potion of the existing station. Also included i employees' parking spaces to the District's ear,iand proposal h heremodelingofrthec exist '.ng building facades, and increased landscaping, per City requirements. The City Planning Division, on July 10, 1986, reviewed and approved the District's piaposed remodel project. L'ith this completed, the next. step for the District is to prepare the bid package and advertise for bids for the proposal request Dfor authorization to accept bids be presented with the RECOMMENDATION: The Agency approve of the remodel work whir', is necessary to accommodate aerial ladder truck for Fire Station No. 2 and authorize the District to prepare and advertise for bids. Respectfully sHbm)tted, Jack Lani; AIrP, Deputy Executive Director JL /LD /kap attachments: Location Map Site Plan A- j �;"- �, , its f .Y f 14,Fm 2 t I .RmI l 5 0 r 0 � �i{II !o➢I �- p � MUM It yl � 0 ■a'�� 1 a� lSLin- l faff�fta '- f�i l� ll f i� fl � N o , 1 n r eoo ►ff� z :l it E fit ii 'Kul ire PROTECTION DISTRICT p. 0. ROr 3S • 6023 AMETHYST ST. -RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 (7141987-1$35 •J. August 15, 1596 Jack Lam ?, City o� :,ancho Cucamonga } Redeva opment Agency P. O. Pox 807 },' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 , ' �~ Dear Jack: on August 14, 1986, av a regular Board of Directors mestiag, the District vas authorized by Roeolultion, to go to bid for the station II addition. This authori- zation was contingent upon a similar action by the Board of the Redevelopment Agency and the completion " of the plan check process. i We look forward to receivin%l authcrization by the RDA on August 20, 198'0. As soon as the proposed contract .,r is developed and the bide are received, we will submit them for your staff review. , ` I thank you for the guidance ;ou and your staff have pgive.. ur Sincerely., r Robert A. Corcoran fry Division Chief /operations , jV RAC /as re: Linda Daniels R E C 9 1 V E 0 OW OF W cwck dn" rr eR190tLOFNINT AGENCY ;C AUG 19 1986 AM I .� .t ':0.D �Y•2 .v WA M, ( -A. rti .9.,t i j. y/.�.. M . 2'.. .p a Lions Park Coarwnity Center ,1161 Base Lino Road 3accho C.,eamcngs, California 0yyyer 20• kjfij - 7x30 o.u. All item submitted for the City Council Ages's must be in vritiog. The deadline for submittiog those item is S:DO P-m. am the Yadnesday prior to the meting. The City Clark's Office receives all such item. A CALT. TO O 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Roll Call: Mikels __. Buquet , Sing Dahl _, sod Wright B. AmeWNCY4TN7�TLIUM 1. Thursday, August 21. 1966 - 7:30 p.m. - CABDIDATFS FORUM - Lions Park Comrani h Center, 9161 base Line Road. 2. Thursday. August 21, 1986 10 p.m. - PARS 20VULOPMENT COMMISSION - Lions ra, jmmuaity Canter. 9161 Base Line Road. 3. Wednesday, August 27, 1986 - 1:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Coma pity Center, 9161 Base Line road. 4. Thursday, Septecber 11, 1986 - 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION - Lions Park Come:onity Center, 9161 Base Line road. S. Presentation of Proclamation velcoming visiting students from Japan. s' Y Y �tr i , r, City COuncaL Agenda -2- C. CONAMI r LEE Tka following Consent Calendar iteen are enpected to be rortive a" moo- coatrovrsial. they will be acted upon by tke Council at we tiw witboat dic.=-!zz 1. Approval of Minutes Jana 10, 1985 2. Approval of Warrants, Regfater Nt' -. 8/6/86 and 0/13/06 and Payroll ending 7 /14tt* for the total amount of $1,416,912.03. 3. Alcoholic Bevarago Application No. AE 86 -11 for Off -gale leer A Wine, Haan A. Abdsljaber, N- Aalgoo Market, 9032 Archibald Avrous. 4. Approval of Release of bonds and Notice of Completion: Tract 12523 - located an Cho north aide of Lomn, east of Archibald - gastwind II Joint Venture Accepts Maintcnsnce Cuaraoree toad $47,590.00 Relations Faithful Performance lord (Road) $246,400.00 ysithful Performace land (Storm Drain)$229,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -239 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORIA, ACCUPTINC THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 12523 APD AUTHORIZING THE TILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TEE WORK 5. Approval of Relents of Bonds and Notice of Completion: Parul Map 8477 - North side Lomita Court, between Rellman and Awtb)jt - David A. Stephenson Relesset VeitlLful Pettotmoee Bond (Road) $4,300.00 RESOLUTION 80. 86 -27A A RESOLUTION OF TOE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY UP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCSYTINC THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 8477 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLEIION FOR, THE WOKS August 20, 1986 1 13 20 22 24 25 27 City Council Agenda -3- August 20. 1986 6. Approval to advertise "Notice Invitiog Ride" for the 28 improvement of Arrow Route and 9th Street from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue RESOLUTION NO. 86 -241 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 07 TOE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TH3 ARROW ROUTE AND 9TH STREET INPROVEMmTS BEINREN VINEYARD AVENUE AMD AECBISALD AVMIUE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIP-RCTIBG THR CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 7. Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public 33 Improvement and Dedication between John P. Asodt and Esooa J. Arndt and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Asodt's property fronting Hamilton Street. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -242 40 A RESOLUTIONN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JOHN P. AhODT AND EWA J. AMGDT AND AUSBORIFING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLSA,t TO SIGN SAME Approval of Improvement extension Agreements and 41 Securities for Tract Has. 12525, 12739 and 127411 located on the vest side of Center Avenue between Arrow Highway and 26th Streec, submitted by Deer Croak Partners. RESOLUTION 30. 86 -243 44 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT OCTH.SI00 AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACT BOB. 12525, 12731 AMD 12741 9. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with 45 Associated 8ogineera for the preparation of Contract Draviog, Specifications sod Engineer's Estimate for the Excavation of Alta Loma Basin Mo. 1 in an amouut not to exceed 978500.00 to be drawn from Redevelopment and System Development Foods. 30. Approval and execution of contract documents for the 47 Im,tovemant of Highland Avenue from 200 feet west of the Alta Loma Channel to 150 feet vest o8 Cambridge Avenue. City Council Agenda -A- August 20, 1986 11. Approval of Profeosion.l Services Agraemeut with Carter 48 ' Associates, Iae., for the preparation of a Pavement Management Bystom, for Local Streets and a Curb, Cutter and Sidewalk Iovaotory for the City of Rancho Cucamonga ;t in an amount not to v eed 838,350.00 to be drawn from. Cu Tax Funds. 12. Approval of Extension Agreement for Annual City Vide 49 Street Tram Service Agreement Contract with United Pacific Corporation funded by 11- 4637 -6028. Total cot to exceed 9100,000.00. 13. Approval of profwvalonal services contracto with John 50 .,- Carl Warnecke A Associates and Roger Greonlaw 6 Associates. 14. Approval and award of the construction contract for the 58 improvement of Sermon Avenue and Saadlt�c Street and the improvneut of 8armoaa Fork, A lo(�- project between the Eogineerive Division mud the Coaaunity Son ions Department, to valley Crest Laudecapes Inc a 7715 garnet, van Muyo, as the lowest respuitibla bidder at 81,322,380.00. 15 Approval of agroema-t with C.I.A. fnyinasriug in an 71 •.. amount not to arceed $38,700.00 to provid± iaspectlon S services, material testing and survey for imps• -NOnt of Hermosa and Hamilton Streets and Seems* Part _6. Ap'.oral of Service Agreement vita McAllister in the 05 amount of $4.500.00 for Management Consulting Services for Information System Training and Planning. 17. Approval to award Annual Street Sweeping Contract to 88 Baker Equipment Company of Pomona Total expdnditur,- not to exceed 830.000.00. Funded by Caw Tax Fund. 18. Approval to award City Vide Emergency and routine 90 k_ Equipment Pavement Repair, Shoulder Grading, and Debris Removal Annual Mainteance Contract to Laird C' Construction of Rancho Cucamonga. Total expenditure not to exceed 990.000.00 funded by Gar Tax fund. t% n 19. Approval of Extension of City Vide tmorgency and 92 i4 Routine Equipment Pavement Repair$ shoulder gradiuk, " and debris removal annual maintenance contract •lth Laird Conseruetior. of Rancho Cucamonga setroest vv from July 19 1986 tbru September 3, 1966. Funding to be { provided by Cu Tax Fund. City Council Agenda -S- August 26, 1986 20. Approval of Improveaant Agreement and Improvement 93 Security for Tract 9649, located on the Boutbwtst corner of Dermot and Wilson Avenues, submitted by The Pannhill Company. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -244 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUDCIL OF THE CSTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND PIRAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9649 21. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 96 Security for Pared Map 7902, located on the east side of Mayberry, south of Wilson, submitted by Arlo W. Blair and releasing the Deposit for Betting Final Mumuaenta, Improvement Agreement slid Improvement S,curity, submitted by John and Rio, Ling. RESOLUTION NO. 66 •243 98 A RBSOLOTION of THE CITY COONCII. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOECA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ' IMPROVEMMT ACR6EONT AND IMPRCVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 7902 AND RtLEASINC THE IMPROVEMENT AGIBENENT AUD IMPROVEM ®T SECURITY APPROVED BI CITY COUNCIL OR APRIL 16, 1986 22. Approval of Proftssdonal Sotvicet Agreement with Fleet 99 Maintenance Consultants for Corporation Yard Master Plan. Total expenditure not to exceed 813,210.00 funded by Gas I" Fund. 23. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 86 -58) for 113 • additional Engineering Design Services by Linville. Inc. for Archibald Avenue Realignment and Improvement between 19th Street and Highland Avenue, amunt not to exceed 33,751.00 to be funded by the Transportation Development Act, Articla 8, 24. Approving reeommendatioo that Program Supplement Na. 10 115 to Local Agency - Stfte Agreement No. 08 -5410 for the .edification of existing Railroad Croasiag protection devices be a ecutod by Council, that copies of such )" agreareat be signed by the Mayor then seat to Cal Trans for final execution. is N A "P w a City Council Agenda -6- August 20, 1906 RESOLUTION E0. 86 -246 121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. AUTUORIZING THE EXECUTION MD SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT 00. 10 TO LOCAL ACEICY - STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420 FOR CROSSING PROTECTION MODIFICITIONS AT GROVE AT &TRY CROSSING 2 -99.7 25. Approval by the City Council of a contract between the 123 City and San Bernardino County to continue the implementation of the Housing Repair /Rehabilitation FrogtaH. Total Cost shall not exceed .80.000.00. 26. Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement and 130 security for Treat go. 10033, located an the south and rest aide of Red Hi11 Country Club Drire, south of Calls Casson, submitted by Rancho Associates, Ltd. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -247 132 A RESOLUTIOD DP IHE CITY COUNCIL OF INS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTYNSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT NO. 10035 27. Set public bearing for September 3. 1986 - Environmcntal Assessment and Revisious of the Industrial Specific Plan. R. c9MMU RRRUM 1, UnrnRLTNE3 FOR SRI.ECT70R PROC SS FOR BOARD Or DIIRCTL 133 FOR ,jH;(- RAN -RO COCAMNmCA COHNU37TY FOUNDATION. (Continued from August 6, !986 mating) 2. DISCURSIOH Or PROPOSED AGENDA FOR JOINT MEETING WITH 136 WATER DISTRICT. (Continued from August 6. 1986 matins) 3. RTATUR REPORT OF ZUM WH RELATING TO E11112DA AR[A. 137 4. RARCRO CUCAMONGA ERARCH T-11MIT SERVICE IMPROVENER 1{8yM. (Continued from July 2, 1966 meeting) c, TAmn OSE AT THE CUCAMUNGA- CUARTI PARR. (May be pulled depending on outcome of 8/12/86 meeting) 6, j11 9w I nATIOH OF ACm'JA PLACEMENT P02 DISCUSSION Or COUNT. r A I f , i YJ City Council Agenda -7- August 20, 1986 je_. AMM=Q— MI•A-WMVM 1. APPEAL OP PN.vrzsG r.Dr,ti:,pISY nlciltoN I nMa 141 CZDI2n iD-V5j-E�1 .T "-1 - yrrnurs Cy FOREIGN wo - A %eating hall in the Coastal Industrial District (Subarea 3) located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APO 2C"-C31 -74. •ULM Pne(aNSUMCE 153 2. 19e6 -S7 CCMMONI= GRANT PICCLr IffPCIT - Authoriaiug the Mayor to sign and submit the 1986 -87 Grantee ^erforwoee Report to the United States HousieC and Urtan Development Department, RE80LUTION No. R6 -248 165 A RE30LUTION OF Iax CITY COOAnIL OF IRS CITY rP RINCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORBIA, APPROYLIG THE 1985 -a5 COMMITI DETSLOPMOY BLOCK GMT PROGRAM GROINS PERFORMANCE REPORT AND AU'IHORIEIYG TEX MATOR IO SIGN S.LMg AND TRANSMIT TO BUD 3. PNOGMAMMIrC• 2LQQC' D► CODteMTTY DgPSa.OP OT alm Crt)T 168 E MDB UR 60IDR BeAam H00MINC PNOGPAM - The City,ia expected to receive additional CDBC'fuuds of 969,000 of which 96.000 is to be progremmad Tor senior abated housing. RY80LUIION ■0. 86 -249 170 A RESOLUTION OP THC CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORMIA, PROGRAMMING 66,000 OF ADDITIONAL 1986 -87 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCS GRMI FUNDS FOR TUC 80201 BEAKED HOUSING PR0.1rCT 4, IIP10GLUOUM 0(1944-54 C9201I11 SUr"PME"T 11009 172 mun—ul I•pgLMOaTMT00 PAR[ 9ITr ACQUISITION TO 1 AIM Tarr PAS& DEVQ.oPMSNT - Reprograming of 1984 -85 CDBG funds of 9150,0000 for Forth Tuvo Park site arouiaitiom to North Torn Park development. 1NQDSNTING Tais 13 CONTINUED -0 3MTIOIBZR 3, 1906 MEETING. C c City Council Agenda -a- August 200 1996 5. ENVIRONxMZAL_A9ftnAMOIi AMD P.ZVK!,f.PM ®T DISTRICT 174 AKMDKMT M-02 CITT OT MICRO CDCLROM - A request to amend the Development District Map from "L" (2-4 du /ac) to "LM" (4 -9 du /sc) for 13.5 acres of land located on the mouth aide of Peron, east of Archibald Avenue - Art 209-095 -02, 03, IA. REQOEITING 2118 1E CONTINUED TO BRPTMRR 3, 1996 MEMING. 6. DEVELOPMENT AG SMMT - SCELON661 tDRCE - An agreement 176 bevean the city of Rancho Cucomorga and Pbilip D. Schlcsser, Elaine M. Scblossovi Albert Rolquin, Jr., Roberta J. Rolquin, Jeffrey P. Ueblosner, Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Cane M. Richardson, regarding the future development and currant operations of the industrial facil.ty no 27.7 acres at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue - APR 229 - 111 -05. 17 and la. 270 CaDINANCE N0. 2P6 AS ORDINANCE OT TEE CITY COUNCIL OV THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPEOVING TUG DEMOfMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITT Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PUILIP D. SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCELOSSn' ALBERT ROLQUIRI JR., ROBERT J. ROLQOIR, JEPFRgY P. SCRLOSSER, JACQUELIN L. SCULOSSER, DAVID M. RICOARDSON AND GEMS M. RICHARDSON 7. APPlQM 9F. TER C :212'AB. NEGATIVE DECLARATION, 273 MD AUjpLAY•aTION TO ADVERTISE FOR PROPO5AL2 ZD2 TAP aKRZ, PARK WEAT E[TEIISIaN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT- 1 At EMS OP ISSUPANCP REOOI RMRMTS TO OPERATE 292 AKBULAVCZ - Consideration of an Urgency Ordinance amending the liability insurance requirements to be obtained by ambulance operators. 1. TER MILE .R I .ml® AT TION PFOGRAM - Report to !h� City 293 Council regarding the traile implementation program and C request for professional services. (Continued from July 16, 1986 meeting) ,ts R Clt7 Council Agenda -9- August 20, 1986 ' r' r 2. IRCOLTIC9 OPTSO88 lot Tel CITT'S FUTURZ• (Coutlnutd from August 6, 1986 msetiu8) i I � Jean lt, I906 ' r CITY OF RASCT0 COCAAWCA - I; ` CITY COCBC= Mon , - , A. "LL TO Olin . A regular Routine of the City Council of the City of 4cch0 Ovntoete mat on Bodaesdey. June 16, 1966, in the Lions Part Cem.ity Cuter. 9161 Paso Line +, bad, 4x110 Cxsme.{.. the meetly was celled to ardor at 703 p.m. by „a7er Jeffrey Sias. 1 Protect seem Cesecilemeb.", -Jon D. Mikmiq Charles J. 49aet II. Richard M, Dabl, Pamela J. Bright, and Bayer Jeffrey sing. _ P i Also Broader rotes City Manager, Worn M. Buserro; CLey Attorney. Jams Nark maul Assistant City Manger. Robert IIrsal City Cloth, hnarly A. Autbelet; d • Administrative Analyst, Bark I. Writm[l Community DeralerHOt Director, Jack IV Lay city Roamer. Brad Rollarl City blister. Lloyd M,bbs; Administrative Services Directors Jim Sort; Commits /vnicso Dlcaetor. Bill Halley; Sr. planner, ban Cot ins a{ Adsiscest Pioneer. Scott Sarpby; sad Civil Cyisser. '4 ^St. 31... Pruden. tk � &I. Thera) y. Jana 1f. 1966 - 1{70 p.m. - pAdg tZIRLO OCIT COMMpItW - L/on _ Park Community Center. 9t61 Lew Lies bed. R, lodnnday, June 23. 1966 - 7100 Pa - PLABRDO C IESIN - Voss Park % Community Center. 9161 Base Line Read. !, I 33. Th..@a". Ja.e :6. 1966 - 7130 p.a. - ADyt /0RT COIONISSIm - Lin., Park Community Contort 9161 Base Lime good. M. rrseve4tlss to Jim "too& Mathias Chamber of Commerce fruide.t. p., Warn Buuran rsquatted a cloud wdo. at the -Into of the "*ties to disco, property Acqubltion. so th side of Paces, vast of Totters by [anklne, eaaoae r CONSIST L_oust I A9irnal of Ki.ty.83 Sal 7. May, 71, 19161 Mal 23, 1966 1,1nd Sq 39, "ST 1166 ITf mats roe nBauli 1riwlo 19 D si 3' T'± 0. Approval of Ranter'. Register so'.. 6-6-66 and 6 -11 -86 led Payroll analog 3 -21-66 for the total am -not of 6343.660.24. :. C3. Alcoholic %nosman Application So, AD 66 -07 for Off -Sale Man A 0s.I a, License, I..s Crxaey Cega.y (III Golding,. Inca 6178 19th Street. (OWf -0t ALCOROL) 'ere CA. Approval of Map. Agrovameot Agreement .ad Improvameut Security far Tract I + 13032 located to Ise- Lime, uses of Itivoods Reserve, submitted by The'fill.. s,= L7an Consey. (0602 -01 .GIll IMOV) (1002 -09 W FOAL) O:_flta Off -RN.. ' 7.1thful ForformeRoO leads 411012,000 6190,000 _ Labor nod Restrict Belt 6 306.000 1 93.000 ^ Y 813CLUTION 10. M -176 w�- A 7mOLOTION Or T11 RTY OCOICIL OT 719 CIA OF RARC10: .� WCLM", 01.170311A. A7ROII1C DIPICIFS9{T WASINUT, _ IInersmy muziTY, ISO 1IIAL MAT OR MCT 206 1305 1 b,e`.Y )Y .. r >.�,71�•c. ^�. «..• �r Y tar o . ,'ej tt [Y Coi:.l It X(oatu y. Joe, 17, t9% ' .. Fees 2 C5. Appaoeat of Nap, Atte.ugat for Yortpooeug¢t of appasrat ,of CC&,',. Iapma .Nt Atneugat tot lo0rnutat Security for Tract 12022 loot[" an the vest Std. of Xilliko Assess. .outb of Victoria Park Lave, submitted by no Will. Lye, Coup.,. (1002 -09 ILL7 7111[.) (0602 -01 MIES LMIOV) Faithful Performers Bodo t Vt. Deals 6922,000.00 Vast 4420,000.00 9.tc 6696.000.00 Ma)Or 9tna Jgrnugon 01.2 96,000.00 Labor sod Material teals otor. Deals $462.200.00 Vast 6110,000.00 East 0202.000.00 major Street Ivemoate a649.000.00 RSIM 2CM N0. 86 -117 A SEMMES! ON TOO CITY COUNCIL Or FIN CITY of RANCHO MCLNWA, CLL110301A. AFFECTING AM AGESCWJNT vin TES y aILLIUt LION CCMKTY 701 M 11COtM1r ON APPIMa ON CCLV3 col T/AM 13022 � - Evaaaa lo. A6 -1•c A taCT.pilt, W TES CITY CCONCIL CT n[ CITY Of IANCNO ,A COCAM ICA. CLLUOISIA, A7FIMUG IMPROVEMENT AOIIMINT. ' .. IrlloltREpT StMatTY. AND DUAL ILLS ON TRACT 10. 11022 C6. Appm,t of ,lap, Lad hopnty 7Vror.veat Ceotract sod Liu ASretugat. ' IWM..t Agnaugat tad Security for Pacwl Map %A (0I 95-0), located ea the n, thea.t Boner of Sent. salts Areas, ad Fourth Strut. submitted by - fees „as 2onu Deralop.ant. (102 -09 ME TINLL) (0602 -01 ADRI I/W Faithful YRfar.tges Sod, $22.500 Labor sad 14urid tad. 611,250 'ldeq[oavdlat Utilities. $72.000 t 1OROTYON 00. 66-179 A IC/20rICS Or rat CITY COOOCIL M ITS CITY ON LINCIO CLGMzGA. C411100U. AFFECTINC FASCLL MAY .CMln 9497. (TENTATIVE ELLCM up $0. 96$2). A AUL not4TY lKnor enT CaNiUl? at Lim A namT ADD IIPMrtMOT AOIIOIINr, ADO IM mmor is lun C7. Apprarat of Map. Isprata.ant steamer INK Ivtcraaoat Security far hest 152$2 twat" ov Arm Rootso oat of Deer Creek Channel. submitted by lobutson Doug,. a DLrbioa of Cahill Corpotatloa, $antboa Division, ri (1002 -09 My FINLL) (0602 -01 AGIII IMIOq ,A avolorla 19. a -leo .Y A IOCLUr2ON M rat CITY COUNCIL of r19 CITY 02 WCSO COCAM U, CALUGNIA, AFEIOMIC IIPACTIMINr AGREEMENT. r' tM MUMal SECURITY. ADD TIDAL ILLY Of TRACT S0. 12202 CS. Appooal of rrolenlaul Ienlcn Atno.at (CO 96-038) Lib Linille-Ctrlt , Eetfauu/ gad $.""Ore. Is.. t0 prorldo Its... $pKlffeatioaa ad IttLYtt for the ION- 41ISeaKt at Igroraaa.t of Archibald Averse Esau ■inetoentb Strait to !M[hltd Argues for an &asst at to tresd $9.120.00 plat WE coativg.oc'y {' to be financed fns the fletw Food. (060211 CMTRAC ) C9. Approral ale. at Caatr,es Docentats (CO M -059) for Couttvetlaa d, L $d al$ SIM, [1916[ el Cantrutivg.}" of Trafftl St(UI, at slthe Jose ya+.= s t...tiau, 4 LOatrK[Ob CaatUt[ YU tfadd at the ia0 6. 11% 96vettl mgttaN,�,' r>'ly- c"• 1279.760 . $29,260 covtic seam funded fnn S.D. 325 ad 5 to" 0"'lopust, y7, (0602 -01 CONTRACT) , r If • city council slauce. 16. 1966 fqe 3 et C10, Approval aad m.cutlan of contract dacuwete (CO 66.060) for the Arcblbdd Avea.a /Lose. Ara o. ptojaop Laird CCestrnC:ton contractor. Contract .o ..td" at the Joe. 4 •.A Council esatlah. 3651.960 It . 663,019.69 ' c niageoles funded frog Jo 7" Fulda. (0602 4f CONTRACT) ell. Aiptov.l of proposal Cot services a" s.eatlo. of ffofoaloesl 6enitn Aasewvb (CD 66-061). to Coaaoe[loe lddaia.atlou amp In. Flatten. Clvll CaCina.rin for the Cooattactlon of Traffic //teal@ at 3 location.. 09.176.00 food" frog spteo D".1opavet. (0402 -01 CURTnn) ell. Approval of pro"..l l.[ @.rv/e.. aad ..Carlos of Pcofseal.esl t.olco' AB[eraaat. (CO 86-062) to D.tbl.b. Casa .vJ Afescl—c.e for eau Afcbibald Av.une /Goon Av4o. ftojoet. 347.777.00 funded froa Cal Tat food#. (0602 -01 COMM C 3. Approval of a If ...as IM b6 -063) Son" by Fetropollav Water District of to.tb"2 C.11tote/. p@Taittly to. City t) statute av "south#. tta11 to be cootratt,d In coaj.netioa vitb desetopasot of Tract 12662. (0602 -01 COMM) Cie. Approval or holes#. of Be WE a" Retie. Of Completion, (0602 41 BOND must) (0704-03 'JOT =Any) ' D.L 0306 - taut" at $230 foothill Pastorate. D"Ilop.r, Eduard. Caostrvctiov Co. f.icbfal Pse....c. PaW, 36.000.0D .• 613CLpna 10. $6.161 A tommm ON TIE CZTT COUNCIL Of Tat C371 Of WC10 CUCA30,CA. CALIf0n2A. ACCIFf6c TU PUBLIC IRTIWI6nn FOR D.t. pled AND ADT6mIIDC Tat FnilO Or A NOTICE Of COMMON /Oa 76910n Cll. Approval of 1ba Residential Street 4babllft.tioo Project - sees. 1, "Chortle olio, of Police of C.mplett.e. and Approve Fiaal tep."tta[e of ` 046,761.31. (1110 -10 START ARROWS) (0704 -16 NOT COMM) hn CL0T2ON go. 86 -163 A RESOLUTION ON Tat CITY COONC4 ON no CIR or SEEM + com"Ch. [ALtronta. ACLIRVc no romic I.rnopnOT3 Tot Too 1n"UTL6L $Thin ZM MIUTIW "WrC.t - ?We I UD AOTRORIZLG Ten FILING OF A NOTICR of A6nrrlw FOR 712 von C16 Approval to adapt a 4480tualev of Ibtval Benefit a" approl.s . report coaeerelat monolog set Aside leads. (0207.06 M) ` RESOLUTION 00. 66 -163 - - A RESOUTION of Ted CITT COUNCIL ON rot CITT of LUCRC mckoOICA, mizoa L. Arrimlo0 lnOht Cnemuc 10osva ' $n unit MOO. APPRO@vO 939 of CW111r. $n miDs nm WUZDZ OF LUCID MWILO"T 1101BCT AIWA END nCVrDOG oneh NdTIES3 nOYMY nIATVO T12AnG + CI7. Approval of taidor.easet Aar@ertet hosanna the City a" lcdseela(o@ot Agency r.I.rdin$ the destal1.t0e of 114`11c LAPT"4soeu la certain terA.ted neighborPa "d. (0602 -01 AGRn 12120) , C16. Approval of eswl 1034 to 1"n.lopwat Agnc). (0103-06 RDA) ' L CIE. th tgporC by Scott Cable DCt Cable to to As"" to the ese. [bat portion of Reveha n, r of ad Avenue o the sere c, dean • City den end V Of nn'"d C(ry lido. *.it at RllltR.a bane uaA .LSE of l NSEeWG[.va Frei "Not 9lraID Fb3t CONSENT CALtaRI YD fYCID U CI7T IWlGY'i n1R tC/iZT IS�1 10. Cl. (1203 -01 tlTf) of acilities (CO 364 bas with A. L Salter D.i.lapant tar the �. test of pav#I Lin tvau e[ 9atblsC bdlltlo at 9)M 6aes ISna b ". Rexbn huaon{a. (0602 -01 et i t. t.. y City Council minataer - Joae 10, 1919 Fate 4 CIL Approval to destroy City records. (0704 -00 SECOND MNACOIOT) SESOLCTION i0. 96 -160 A RESOLUTION OF 166 CITY COOSCU OF PRE CITY N WCEO C9UMmCA. CALIFORNIA, AOTROLUUC PRE DOTEDCTlm Of CITY ■t0mDR AND DOOINRNn SOCI lR 00 LOICR ■OQUIRED AN PROVIDED Not& C1. :nRMOT CCOS SUTIm 11090 C22 Approval of Revolution allowing Joining of the California MOatci Pal future=. Authority for gannral liability cwar"s, Asaml steel= is S1U,933 with u SIX of 910o.ODO dad 65 edition —1—, (6{01 -I5 UIOWCS) MORMON t0. a6-17OA A ROOLaTIM Of Rg CITY C006CIL m Us Cln or WOO MCk"CA. CLLIIDMU. RESCIADIRO tOELOTtm 20. 66 -170 a In FRIUM, AND ACIZICIC TO ELMS A MRAn OF Tit CALIFORNIA MICIPAL nIDWCE AOn01171 AND IFlTICIP1n O III LwaITT PROGRAM CY). Appswal of Resolution -.tuns Artlaln IilI 1 •ppr."UtLaos limit. (0400 -00 FUNCS) IMMOTIM 9O. 66 -199 A RU LUTION OF TIE CITY COOICU Ce TIE CITY OF WCRD mCA11mCA, CALIFORNIA, OTANLIS ®O AN APPROPRIATION SIMIT nRJNT TO ARTICLE FILL R m "a STATE OF OLJOOIA CmanTpTIm. FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996 -97 CIA. Approval of Resolution s0ppertlnc Council decision and relating, n Radesem-ntel Aeabswat and Yon athe lead II9UI - SoodlabS Pacific. (1002 -09 s"DrTLI700) Itsmonof 10. 66 -1m A aramona OF Tog cm Cmcm Of TED CITY of MOO EDCANOICA. CA,Iron7A. Apno?"O A tgUOT FOR A TOUTIFC TOCY OF. smn II902. TO FERNII A COSTMI LOT RESIDENTIAL SODIFUlm ON 79.7 Ann Of LAND O TO 9RT Lm nDUOTIAL DUTRICI AND LOUSED ON PRS OWMIST COMO OF RUMOR ATOOE ND NIfmD AVOIDS, WOO CCU"", CALIFOPRU, ND Kama )Corals ND EDeFOIT PROEDr C27. Approval of Resolution eopportlog Cowell decision and salaries to Enlrowatal Aasaa-wot and Doval.pee t Real. 65-97 - ANDERSON. (1007 -09 on60p Rolm) 1O0LUT9's 60. 66 -167 A tnOLOYION OF TIE CITY CmICU Or TIE On 01 MOO CICL"CA. CA.UORNU. APPROVING AN APRLICITY(M FOR DUIL09MOT RCIRN. 10, D.L 97 -77. FOR DETRIMENT OF "Us (7) notanuL BUILD ICS m RUNUIt LOUTID VITRO TR'a 0ISMAL noumtsiJILM ISSUED DISTRICT (SOME& 7), 700 ►EAT SOT 07 Tone A1RN06. WOO EDC010CA, CNUONIA, AND nialy FUDOC6 n s09F0EI TLnEDr _ C16 Appvr",I of 4-01,1163 94Jutiag sale" rages and beecAsa for all foil -tdw ud part-ties glpsaa 0f the CL" of Rancho Cccaeoada for fiscal ' year 19m -17. WOW -0 FLOm3ni - it RESOLUTION 10. N -tee , A SOOLOnm m 729 CITY CWSCtL OF IRS CITT W� WCFO. COCANWCA. CALIFORNIA. LOCnDUO IRSOLOTlm 10. 1) -107 N7 - '! Rnmonm g,0. 15-107A R19ATn0 TO SA4U MCI$ Ago 300179 101 ALL 171,TIMI ANC FAST TIME INFLCUM m 719 CtTT OF WCSO CUCAR16A In FISCAL TUN 1946 -67 _a 'YV'. ,+ ' � �• � t ,' .enpi [� -''rye/ ! it City Cc all Minutes " Jae. 10. 1966 Page 3 1 C27. Approval of Ieproreaeet Agiea@$at and Iprovannat Security for CDP 67-37. ' located 0o the vast aide of t@$oa Areas.. rartb 'of foothill FeeLsed, ' ea&Lttcd by Sceneries Corporation. 0602 -01 AGGO IMM) _ ' RESOLUTION t0. 66 -169 A WOLVIIM Or TMt CITY LMICM OF ng CITT Ot RASCSD MCA1100CA. CLLa0a IA. Ammuc IMR rmcmT ASuptcoy MD ronormoz emRAn Pat QP 63-37 1 C28. ApPrn.l of carne, SmtnueN.e. for the cq"1110. of CL97 Ted located at •171 Stern Street. Council estates ability to dual near. tot • period af, • _ 30 drys after the data of epaulet. (1002-10 CITY PROPERTY) „ _ at. fat •public During for July I. 1963.to caaaldtr issulas counrclal and .. iedvsteLl�nornaes(ra refuse pert_ to Re.te Disposal, Tak0n Disposal aid d ' tutor. Masi*. 0170-04 RENOgn .. ' C30. tat pblln Poring - July 1, 190) - Iov l.enoaul Ass.ta.at and Coastal t flea AviedNat 36 -02A - Situation - sad ti irenpat.l Asaacoeeet and ttivaeda Specific flan Snootiest 06.01 - I ... At". (0203 -03 Of AMEND) (0207 43 It AMEND) `- C31, get public huveng - Jet, 16. 1966 - Teter.. at 70.48. 9.1s - Appeal of ' }laming Ceedselae decision, sevokiat COP 84-IA. (0701 -06 AFPZLL) MOTImt Maned by Debt, recorded by 9rigDq to approve the Coo..L Calendar. tin 't.. carried ... odiously 7 -0. asee.a DIStLESlm Or In. Cl- AevMVat. s ttneTat Da. 7. Pinatas, meat Snot by Y(ldbt, a.0edad by clot, to a1p[na - iant Mal 7 giants.. Nodac ur[Ld 3-0. e. •+ M.v 21. 19M Minutest MOTION, Miffed by Deal. toceadd V ouguet. to approve Pay 21 duaua Nation erred 3-0, ' DR 22. IoM vtnnte.t NOTImt Mud by potent. sKaadd by Mile. to .prove Hey e u 21 fast@$. Nation carried 4 -0-0-1 (Dahl Asset fn that +„a0 It etaaiaed). i M•e 2a. 1aM M1eee.t 101`1001 Kwitny Wrigktp aateeded %7 ❑c, we ' May 29 darts.. Mattes tarrled'4-0-0-1 (Mlkal..boost feces that Latin i. be , abstained). 2saae. 02. SoNm ITO Appartionrat of Re@$asonc., Adoption of tasolasiaes Jrdarlu8 hga.tive and feasted of fewer .d utt(y Public Yerlag far July 16, 192-6. _ Applicable to the Slott Strut Industrial fart, sad "at coast District, , (0401 -03 in ST AD) �• NaOLMOR 50. 66-194 A Ia OLOTim m TIME CITY CmdCZ OF TSg CITY or dASCRO arumImu, CJ.LI70ENid, OSDPRaG ngtauTim Q A RtAYPOdnmMENT &MIT Up AMENDED ASSESSMENT AAD DIAGRAM ES A SPRCIAL saga /MINT DISTRICT a aTASLU1190 - • RIAPPORTIOMMY 7825 e Sn¢C[IM 50. 66-197 _ "<. A ItlO.OZlm 08 COOSC7O Tot f` 1g! Ome . r m 1 oo l orr. , GIVIDO CA, CALM nmME t CITZSC A D TLACS 17I107AL, ASO tRfaC A TMIO can /LAC, GIP PRO ATT IAL, A 4' FOR NBLIC tLAR1f0 LIC BUSING y Mont Mixed b/ While. ,needed by King. to approve Resolution tea. 86 -194' �• ad 36 -193. Metter carried ..truly 7 -0. - i 1rY 65 "w yam .f . �ar•1 i �t i 1. •a .�� _Kl la. CLtylvaell flaw., ., Joe tg. Ifl6 u r rge 6 s.•esa � CDUtii. rvdaalg Ol. CD�itL w 6 n ri e1rD m eReports dA by C.tt it Dahl aidy ru"n"t l (twga.t std A6I) Reports mew medn by Coaxil Wry bah! std Coneellrs 7avust. (I403 -01 CrLy Oy council Dahl pointed oat that the ..bcoedttee coa.lstlng of bl Walt led C0000tlaw {roe[ bad come alp with a list of palllacatiou As f011ov /t 1. to political Ntrrone rbum csnaldsuleg appoL.t.a- J. fast history of ce.waL" lneolv.meat or cametemat co civic actirlti 7 Ud.sstandieg of public ffsesce sad charitable aq.al silos llsaa:e it passlbl.. {. comity respect. 1Wge and Ceputatloe. S. h "loci reandatlon exparleata It possible. 6. rod raising yatie., through WrL, viltd Vey. teach or ether "tivit:u. Coanell.0 snot potato. out that Camel' bad pr.vtesull talkd about such Caaaell,ober smbaitting toe sumes, going abrOUSb . ltterylwln process. sad Council ulertigt c.reas fry. that Scrap of cm. !bat rtbod road conflict .1N the bit., vileb .entitles that eatb C000cllaaab.r aey As Co. oprohtmeat able% "old tolocld. with his term of Office. Veynr King suggested that they "faced through the later iminS eCmsssa tk.n .srb Co.. oil a .be, appoi.t eve fro. tbs list of tae. Councilmen mikde pointed out that people who her. "eat/ "Co to gee. 1 - 9, would not neaesasvlly Bev. tend catalog wparLeme listed as ga. 6 Taancit"". Wright "seared that pri to v old fall late ." earns" Or tbs .,bar. $be ask" If .e waited all the people with fan[alist" sport "ce, or did we vat a ale as the BOSCO? Cowssitsoo VLkale gaastieua +bat was the parpoa of the Beard? If the cola "Mae of Ns bard was to C.las fond$, tbea raiss flags. comtllro Cruet stated that the isbnt was I clear ad that was sot to eke it a single interest or a eiests purpose onsaieaclea. 14yer flat expressed that we needed people who bad eaper/eoal is tbs beginning with food ".log. Councils Dahl pointed at that ".*tally tbs argeslssaioe would Woo idtpedoot of the City and the Cleo Council; tbovaieras the people brought is far the fa.drainlug wperlewn should sire be of tbs wu.tive 1 "41 to nn the ugaluclev. council. Dill eomurrd with the general directive Council was taklag; that at the frost eat re blue a flat Calling group and tbu later ma the actual readotioe valid take "era Daumllrs flkels stated that be liked Dr. !net's suggestion of howls{ a reoaittoo that would provide input free the causeeatey to the read. If Co.mll out is the' directlors tbs. Council waded to fewltse )It ao•tl.,d .pprerb. ACtions Valor ffeg staid that all aaate etalld be ."tied by the duly 16 matim, At that tlm, they weld all op taw interview precuts, bnpefally to be held late July or early August. Cowil concurred to As that, final selection at the and of August. At tttt sam time, they could consider the this "'e aeglilary group. rri p u . \ y a r - s.•esa � CDUtii. rvdaalg Ol. CD�itL w 6 n ri e1rD m eReports dA by C.tt it Dahl aidy ru"n"t l (twga.t std A6I) Reports mew medn by Coaxil Wry bah! std Coneellrs 7avust. (I403 -01 CrLy Oy council Dahl pointed oat that the ..bcoedttee coa.lstlng of bl Walt led C0000tlaw {roe[ bad come alp with a list of palllacatiou As f011ov /t 1. to political Ntrrone rbum csnaldsuleg appoL.t.a- J. fast history of ce.waL" lneolv.meat or cametemat co civic actirlti 7 Ud.sstandieg of public ffsesce sad charitable aq.al silos llsaa:e it passlbl.. {. comity respect. 1Wge and Ceputatloe. S. h "loci reandatlon exparleata It possible. 6. rod raising yatie., through WrL, viltd Vey. teach or ether "tivit:u. Coanell.0 snot potato. out that Camel' bad pr.vtesull talkd about such Caaaell,ober smbaitting toe sumes, going abrOUSb . ltterylwln process. sad Council ulertigt c.reas fry. that Scrap of cm. !bat rtbod road conflict .1N the bit., vileb .entitles that eatb C000cllaaab.r aey As Co. oprohtmeat able% "old tolocld. with his term of Office. Veynr King suggested that they "faced through the later iminS eCmsssa tk.n .srb Co.. oil a .be, appoi.t eve fro. tbs list of tae. Councilmen mikde pointed out that people who her. "eat/ "Co to gee. 1 - 9, would not neaesasvlly Bev. tend catalog wparLeme listed as ga. 6 Taancit"". Wright "seared that pri to v old fall late ." earns" Or tbs .,bar. $be ask" If .e waited all the people with fan[alist" sport "ce, or did we vat a ale as the BOSCO? Cowssitsoo VLkale gaastieua +bat was the parpoa of the Beard? If the cola "Mae of Ns bard was to C.las fond$, tbea raiss flags. comtllro Cruet stated that the isbnt was I clear ad that was sot to eke it a single interest or a eiests purpose onsaieaclea. 14yer flat expressed that we needed people who bad eaper/eoal is tbs beginning with food ".log. Councils Dahl pointed at that ".*tally tbs argeslssaioe would Woo idtpedoot of the City and the Cleo Council; tbovaieras the people brought is far the fa.drainlug wperlewn should sire be of tbs wu.tive 1 "41 to nn the ugaluclev. council. Dill eomurrd with the general directive Council was taklag; that at the frost eat re blue a flat Calling group and tbu later ma the actual readotioe valid take "era Daumllrs flkels stated that be liked Dr. !net's suggestion of howls{ a reoaittoo that would provide input free the causeeatey to the read. If Co.mll out is the' directlors tbs. Council waded to fewltse )It ao•tl.,d .pprerb. ACtions Valor ffeg staid that all aaate etalld be ."tied by the duly 16 matim, At that tlm, they weld all op taw interview precuts, bnpefally to be held late July or early August. Cowil concurred to As that, final selection at the and of August. At tttt sam time, they could consider the this "'e aeglilary group. rri p u - rt.~' y. ry _ Cltl. Cauvcll Mlooco - Jos. Is. 196i _ ?.So 7 ., ..- 1� 02. •'� mrnn m n r•tn Jdn, (010f -00 C6N.) � , Merar ilvj tafavdd do, Council that a pot(q ltd e*eg ubbll.ed that all prior to be euN n d Council Ravar. erects be o indicated the oust a6 prior to cbe Beer raj Jae. gavn*r, tone aeM to be aaM flow, oqur an ` this it. +' :J Mr, stgoet pointed out that au of the ... roes be bat ranted a policy tat for advanced "tiflcattee ev Cow it ,"I.... Lteco v.e to bm staff [.pat and to got pgbl Lc Lapot beer* cdvaidara[tev of ao ltu. 0/tbuvt this, it a!". -be s;paauace out Coarcll I. not prep.rd. Mayor King stated that be Mold .ntntfan • sting to plac*'en the Agenda far its caaLou this aright or at a special Mrttn, otberv/u the 'itu no.ld be 4 ",p$d. roantiluv Militate stated Council lad dlsunN this !too about four, cafe µo. Orunt /loan D.el ck x ca out to. Son l" eats erg ybc up bore hue of a t brile .0 it" ty the Cot cil at t 1s tea .1..t 1 Ip.Tt. a be belie be that tee bit" _ f Liu to r, ail loc ti the It,c faster of car, be bathed that the ire. el too Comt7 s, c loutloe in tat tutee la car Cthe needed to be discussed. ..0 ,•state be v, re. the last the ttaa be plated es the gneaber iatlat ar as ion. 29 Le?brief *,. the late dq the gyp tins told r. its* a initiative to,tg nu , Jun• S9. IDerateu. It b*uM tat"Mq to baled the Liu up at tealgbt'e wetted. ' MMM, Marl by Debt, .acoNN by vallht. to piece teas order ion- advarthed public burin, for conrld.r.tio, tonight. Motion failed by the follonlej "tat AM Debt. Yrlgbt 60th, Met.. $poet. sing , an.een Meror aly called • recut at 6920 P.. The naetltg r*ca.,s "d at 8,31 p.u. .1tb .11 Motors of Council "...at reeae � After the recu,, Manr ilea •tatty that ao "thing but taco paa,ad at the , naming Co.faaa/on with recaaaed.tiot to the City Conseil as Lt related to MA au oo ins. ore voold late to disc., this Lea* again. Coevcll comurred to dl.cuv this at the vest ugly gads Coucll A "gnat.. Covocll Ms Qg•at rgvemN that at the asst Council "$tied w' consider nllelu In settled up Joint MatiM, vitb Other .&,odor vies they no generated by the City Coo.cll. eoe*e♦ ` 2 � mrm m scat rc gu•nre U. ftfji ARMSDMT son OffmcmINT-CIELLAM2111 86 -01 - rtly.W j6iF@LCMUE1lhA - dun eMdueat to section 11.06.010 -t(o) ;.cut", to stN(y 4k'4. of ...tow lot aobdivlelosa. Suction 17.06.040-J prtd.ied to ...tie yaro a.u. J,. and Oecti n 17.02.140 pertaining to definition, of Davelop$.nt Cut, at the City r of Rambo Cacamy.. Crd/aa* go. 211. (0101 -03 OC AMC,D) U Mr4a i/ed in a the Mealy for polle burly_ Ibae Duty eo fupo.u, the pills ►staled eat closed. � \ 't + City nest A tbdet fund title of Ord/ooma pun. 211. , 4 . �.• err, .l � - �,' .1 M ` C_ . '✓ .. �f .f J �JJi City Couscil Kauas ' , - ), Joe. Is. 1916 fxi Tat. a ' 1� - OmINYC{ 00. IIIC (,*cod redlag) Y OmINANC: or FOR CUT COUNCIL 0 I-N b'ITT or mesa COCd1, 106. CQUOYIA, AI®DINC TITLS 17 Or Tag RANCID COOxMONCA MAIC17AL =2 IO tQIIN ggRlONa 17.06.010 -6(.). 17.06.040 -3, YO 17.02.140 7gluaa0 m CUDI00 V CDsFoN LOT 1011,21101018. V%ULg TARD ARAM. YD DQIVITIOg, '!- 107SCM&T MOTION, "ad by Mlket.. ."..4d by e.Oo.t, to.ab. toll r.dlag of Odiaaoa, go. 211C. Motto...rrid ....i.eo.17 3 -0. MOTIV. Mead by [port, seconded by Pablo to .)pros Osdivance No. 211C. ratio. .,"led .va.iavul7 3-0. as ♦aaIs Q. p�j tU t[TI . aTld 1D • m aeDe •rI h T,(u(`gggg(,g �teff V 12A1t. .es,ft repro by 4uea Vuutea: City 1laupr. (0401 -0) wONC4K Im) Mr1or ties opa" the sale ie{ for acbllt buries. There bei.g u. Iaepoa.s,. the public bearitd vu clear$. .t MOTION, Morel by Aikets. snood" by Vrl{bt. CT adopt 4eolctioe No. 86 -190. Maelet Lurid mneelonelT 34 4 ■STOLVTION 40. 96 -190 A nV Of TIN CIn COUNCIL TIC CITY OF WC110 ' mCA"u, C4LINNSL. IN RIC N MITI YI QAnON 30. 3 Be. CO LYI TQYR DISTRICT { (411 vl)TS pPLANNED COMMUNITY) AMD ACRp2O Us A 0041,1WS sOa7 YOU • AR $0. 1267 3. 15603. YD II902-1 TRIO -6 aaaaa♦ o. Omz�c Tat vc!rs �pf TO -TAR e-- 4 f as .nra a•�aNm reamnm aDa IIW2 AN• a MI (Ow l-03 LIGHT AND L]MS -1 Tv0 .d 1 +.0 IrRDYna SNR �Ga1 (0401 -0] s,2 LICRt m) - Mayer tied open" the mettles for public burled. net@ hotel as reopen... the public ►urhq ... Closed. once. Mared by O.bl. decnnhd of Lint. to Approve Issolutl.a so. 96 -191. Motteo Corsi" ueetlesuslp 5.0. samunas s0. 46 -191 A Romano dF Tit CITY COVIC11 ON us CUT OF wCIO - atl1mG. muonis. Omnnc TAI VOR a Contmal Vin ATNIIAnON 10. 3 TO STUB LICNT®O IYaTeYCX DITLIR t0. (IRA VISTA AJM1m CONYSITO YD ACCgn3C nd FINAL MCINdII•9 14U1T FOR TRACT 10. 12673. ANION YD 129D2 -1 TRIP .6 .. a♦ U. (0401 -0] : A?LUFT I+ ` Zth Mayor Lind npeaed the "atlag for public butia {. There b"eS ee response, the u public battles ..O closed. t , * HMOs Waved. by Wright. mood" by Ml als, to Oppress, 4sofatiou go.', ,. (. x 96 -197. Native carried .nY1o.tIT 3 -0. e ,�I 3y't Yl?��;(. lie :' 'f P• Ate✓ _ _ �.: Simi :k 9 r. d a . r 'E ,g 6 City Council NleoCSa. •_!i� ` Ime. lb, 1945 - a45aanu Ro. e6 -in • A RESOLUTION OF IRS CITY COnCM a ng CITY Of RNGRO . -•- Caumcd. OLirowls, oOniva INS voK,0 COItcriON Yin ; YgIRAT2O No. 1 TO lTastr LICS7ISG DISTRICT 80. 2 AID 'ACchnno TYC FOAL OCINSWB WORT FOR TRACT NO. 12577 {fora♦ R1. NI T O! aV • ass A4 -dub - rda!i - one �r i!w}�aPiVan[ S 1Y0 ewnnellwi e2figl[T weYST At -0) f➢ILU (Court ... 4tflM VA h 20. 1945 Matte{)• (,• OYnONOUL AC3116*81001i'u0 GOYAL RAS A 60T 65 -040 - A I.".Cut to aamd the Curial Ras LW Use Map from Nathan 4aLdaecLal tf-l.4 W..) to cities (to Conjunction with the dmlopwi¢ of a easier eltian congregate living and can facility) an 4.65 act, of 1u4, located as the oovtb ride of Foothill Boulevard. rant aide of Cucamonga C"ok, rut of rlpera" Ame "S - AO 208-311 -20. 21. (0202 -03 CF ANOD) t"JIM 1OTAL• MIOINOT YD DAYROf1DET DISTRICT ANODNINT 85-07 ' PaQ.RA- A rgme.t to awnA the Moletwcet Districts Nap from Sodium 4si4ant1al (S -L du/.C) to Office/fnfenival (is eo.j..tias with ran 4wdopwer of a sealer eCtican congregate lily ad care facility) an 4.67 act., of lad. located a the saotb aide of foothill tovlevod, vat of Coconeya Creeks vast of Vineyard Aviate - AN 208-211. 10. 11. (0207 -09 DD AMD) ROO.11I03 NO. 66 -77 A RESOLUTIOR R In CITT COUNCIL ON 795 CITY OF RANCHO COUtaGA. CLLUONIL. DOTING VITDOGT 7000viez OTlIONOT I. ASSESINOT AND COWL ,nA0 ANODNOT 65-041, FORM, A PROPOSED ANODNOT Of SRS GOOAt PLA LID 082 . WP Saw NESnN RESIJ• OTUL (A-14 DO /AW 7D MTICI ON 4.67 AMU Of LCD LOCATED CN Tn #0276 am. OF TOO ML IOLOATA. UNIT $09 Or COCANOCA M K. VEST Of TINnAU AYOOC - AO 104211 20. 11 City Masnger Lear" Wasserman stud that a lett" bad bean reeelvd ftom tba applicant rpsaeting that the Ltes be withdrawal ACT10h so action - Liu vLtd,.o by applicant. 45. Deg d Cn e• n9�nYlTmG re•D9 ate at gi -R2 (04 1-23 T) 6vKti. !tall ape,[ by 1aeroo Yuutwt, CLey 4vyar. (OA01 -S,t tam fgtaq Nr. Ynsooasu pointed at that the first itas of huts", sanded to be • Public hu.ing for the general twee. Sharing toads which the City "mill be awing for Iw asfercSwat. Mayor flat open" the tactics for public Snoring +a it rated to the use of rwuoe sberlos fed•. These being va reopesaso the public busing won Mead. NOTIMS N." by Main. Seconded by 11.7. to spot.. atef Ca r" amed.tLo. to dlwste rawness sbuty lads for tw enforcement utwtres. Mattes carried vain Maslr 7-0. Sara. Kr. Uooaarwp 9ruoeted a report regarding t/e Libiary Comte.. 6 1.die.td they we with Al Said en4 tin Librarian to banks CoaMys. As a result of " Oat diervuloe, there will be "w choose.. (1601-06 UJKUY) )U. Cold bid vidtd'tbe Lee" Caaooengs Library uw"Uced In tndie.ted that the Cetaty will be lacrMO(ng the wooing operating hone: Liadltl�tha; '- deficiency It welraS, the County but read as a program to bring s9; to ,Cho ` same lwel par copita a. otter 1LLrari.t. � 4 `e (A." 'r, t't :., Ii��'- 1Z,`y`,.f s, . i.al:. vl!t:<? ^ %`•r ., ..0 "Nix t Y !t1 �J t a 1� u t� Ly t �i Jere 117. rage 10 w■ ' i Mr. Reaseraae farther •rated that w. and asked far s financial awns. V. abedd Down that lefor.atioe s6 Jaly T. The Covatl will be lookl IS at pesue...I coed,.at ad tv I.(.g lowela Its.. Hr. vaanrrua felt that the Coma we. Ilsteain to as ad wee Let ..acted to slidn.tlat th... proble.. Be farther ateCed that share are .Ascal=toly 6301000 for eastinge "in which might be nod data :hd year for the lurar7. LIey1 [abbe presented a report on the Capital Iwyrhararnt PC-St. with spread. , of the pro posd p"jfttr for 1916 -97. mayor King ape." the .art.& fac public bearing. Abte being now taspease. On p.blic,besrlRt!es closed. HOAOh Mowed by DJI, .•ended by 91.1. to apsrora 14ealutlom !o. 16 -191. Motion To Tried by the following votes . ATIS: Malts, luq.t. Tim. DOI 100: wrijbt tl6Rpr1O1 !0. K -1!J A ASICLCTI01 C7 Tit CITY COI/Cm Or ?PC CITT . [NC10 mcalm•cs, CALDONIA. Am"ING Tai CITT'l laic" (L 'nave ' ' XwiCi 63ALA'JC. CAS W. ND OT1A 011CUL 701/06 -ops. AND ADDITIONAL' A71ACT17ASIWS1 701 Fit= VAST 1966 -C eveeee 11. Ay - ❑Dyw_eT_n Ap r anm. gtd0 super, van negaoted by Scutt 6aphy. usAt Ammer. (0701.06 ArtlAL) (Cemacllrr Debt stated tbot he vu Islas to abptai. [rave this !tow L some .f business Jesting, with the 90rsde Theater praoetlo"' Ma7ar Xing opened the .4,406 for public butler. fddreesi% Co "CLI worst CIS= Celletl7, frea liea.l Arebltecu. ban ben I"Olved In the project frea its esetaptlee. Me I.t.4 that three late ngo* they bad ••lamed the optidst style lettering. It was epptned by the City ." the City wanted all Connote to vu lt. They. hwnar. did not fast that aveayoea sbovtd bare to aea it on ibis else of r proJact. As fir ea dg. I"we"'atloe. ,bey felt Lr was appropriate for this type Cot thin center. rartber. tbi. type of lllamLastisa bad ben approved by alck Caro. farrow City Aes..T. An last cameo dealt deb the lengtb of the trellis aides. Thor wanted 7¢ and the City rested 64. Jive Edward.. topcutnlot 7'dwaNs Cie ve ' supruned that they felt they ceded Catty lighted e160n to indicate that they note, Opts. !arms Rental. rlsafing Cooles(s.er, stecol that the sign protras bad set ban board aunt owe weeks age. 6 pointed eat there wen mays of baekli,btLm signs. a" this .es Il "aeeed at the Csadesiom's burley. Coo"Lt.n Sequel asked shy this t.ak two Tests to cent about. MC. Coldness Sr. Kuasr. @rated it won ante pioneered or dies seed. There being to further peptic Cnpeas4. Mayer Xing •load the public busing. - Y � =?jog, Moved by Mingle to door tb4 appaol. Motto, failed due to lock, of .,cad. 'k'l mayor fiy expressed that he would liken to rowel the figs "' it relaid to 9C..ds'Cl.Oen. 6 felt this Vass an idapvd4et cue ad shoals rgwi a the' Olud. a letters with "tarsal lllvdutio.. r IF A i T t, t r t �l 1 City CosuLl s=ouse J.0 1e, 17C In. 11 COaacLlwaun Wright erprerrN chat she leaned toward the plavalng CaWctloe'c r.rbsdadis. tie did not fed *be bed the ability to be a pl toner. Therefore be bed to rely on chase in that politics on this partict %r tau. Caaa>lsed Wlkds felt fiat we .6044 at e.con ng. this type of an appal. CovmL. Was becoming a deals. rwdow casdttes, It we vaad to charge this. than it .trail go to the rlsallog Co desioa. NOTICE: Nesad by tllkels, secodd by Wright to 44W the Appel sit)• the oaderstatdieg that the applicant could wsubalr a welfare sign program to bulge anlow and Planning Corlegion fee spprnul. Comcil•,omv Wright atpr ,," that hot suety ass as long as the Weards 'beater won aatladN. Onld Picbael and one Chrattuon, percents on the p.ojut, sated that they .aU like to bat algbtttw uses, sub a the rsstsurnua sad theater.. be allowed to bne sot type of cbe.Od Lsd letters. Ccucilgoa Nlkels stated that bin original gotten wet to deep the 111P461 without projadlcao allow it to cot back tbrcagh Design galow and na.ulng co.dulos f. enraiderstla, of toss insets tie. slteieb which tae ace rdlestd le the WVOr. eits prngra.. Netiea failed by the following rotas A70t edible. ties Pont gotsaq Wright Aft. patch. discue.ioa and atb. -rtes at lids# gotiaat, the fOLlollng .tie. wet suet WTIOW, Acted by Coquet. .cod" by Wright. to co.tinte to July led cad direct the applieut is tat with staff, proceed with Desita ■aiw is bases to receive the .oil.. fatten carried 1.1 -0 -1 (NLkels voted no, Dahl Altd.d) seea.e WJ. Ilng rend • recut el 1"OU prow. The atstlsg rscon.ad at Uc d7 P.m With ell ambea If We 4md1 proof. ssaa a.eaas 12 c IC yL CCO1 eresceEe mtdvmO to ('egllfrta gaga Staff report "*..:d by Leaven @uerw. City WaePvr. (0701.01 MINUSTOI) Paper tin opsnN the uatim for pvblec baring. Dart being no rupoea, the pablir hearing was closed. City Clark AaHd.t rW ebe title et Ordi.ace so. In ounkics so. 192 Y 0131ItASC9 Or in city cmem Q Wet CUT a tA11.20 MCA"". CLLDol L. ANiDJO IICTlOS 1.10.010.1. 2.74.040.5. 1.28.040, YO f.S.OZO.0 Q' TMI NO OF US aDcgO CUUMU HnICUAL 0009. 411 ltluisD TO tat UTA Of AytODtMT YD TOM N -IMCt IT CltT COWNfgDIU102 NOTl6, Para by Dahl, setaaded 41 Weight. tr uue felt rttdieft of Orllas4c4 so. 101 .d tat .cod vending far Jcly 16. reties carried sa.el..ty 1-0. o ate Ve et• CIn wLIa�R•1 g�T�a t���n ' 4 C1. =. Aprn Vs l of repeat by Scott Cable and WA Cable to l.dede Le their service are& that portion of Raub, Cecm.82 north of Ulblad Avalon to the i :a : to x -jy w tt maj ��V��y -�,`V �• N.Q. �_.. ;- .. _ x � - {.i%{t, .p,�: City, [Neste[ + ' J..0 1S.'190 _ . TMa 1C •• � ' Clc� laden., ..it of KLlliku Avant aed vent of Oraatearov i.sese. t2TW RI.,M nWa MINT CALIFYi K0, Ctd). « aff report by K.tk Lavt•art Add.letrotive Aa•11st. (120301 CATT) City Attorney stated that vo bad clue ap Will, a frareMea Cyclic. and the .bole . polar of that Cyct= was so that Cavxll veald not two to do vbat they va amr Islet. ' Raysr Ttup opeoad the weetim for public batons. Addrennlot Council am - ` Cl"m CrebaR. Rott Cables who etsted tiny had aonpleted 922 of the Initial same• event cad at* auleipatlnt coupl•tiet 1001 by Aulaet. They are interested to psvidlet T.T: ervieas to that seen. Jia pilb.r.'04 Cable. v.e &akin[ to emlce tb• a•e area also. KOTIONt rural by tllk.le, second" by Debt. to apprave stuff's sacearadatioa to gamy butt requests. Ibtioa carried nseirvly At. [ortaclu basnea � T- TOtt IDINITTID reee•e I. ANtlM1TROT t wrim. !laved b/ Debt. svA.ted by tin. to ad)an s to ..bead reads. r.prdle, pmntt2 et9uJritten ...tb aide of ►area. Out of 1.10v =y favkins. Korb. ..tied unudmany 54. Nutlet adj,na d at 11.00 ►.a. Iaspatf.11y subdtted. Ivan. A. Aabd.t City Cla3 Approved, - gry i r r'1r 1� ..ivk t 61 � 1 m•' -P�+ t� 1 1 I ' •a � y n 1 N I: m° In is I O .Yiyh.! i T S , � • ~ i a i •1.', I Y ; I OY Ov 4 •J frw O MJ Yr P •• PN 41,O Y1 L Q+ (N�(P� }byNF D= > yT' iN V Y>:�• m~ Tt IwN 1%• •�' y, - mT Yi r•y y.p nw O T fYtlV .,� y� il.rt Y i D °• n C+j` >= /Y 11 n 4fY ML `L M� QT sL S Ek r�n. r .� S a5 I r Awt+ t !Lmil° M eel D Tt 14 e�Y� rz s « �'• mz i y bna O .fit OOwI 4 i• N 2 M' f• P; O O>' 1'O Y; 'JF N S _SO 111' I. 1 n � N fli K +T r• Yy 921 /aM Op AS NL TO ff < = Op p9 >fC nTi IN r w 1> �T =Mr 3 i,- > „ NrY i� K.. m ^ P 9 Ex e,g rY r O• P,Y, O =i m0 10 T y nw NN 1L Tm' M Pp !, I Sln •Y • -M4 "Of YC ' I ;M �J• y Dy t Y. yS �• n �• I „� n N =Y °�a u r N ' n N SMN 3 N N 4 O *2, r e1 go V ! M i u M Y - u °° I os °e-oi . . °i •uYam sP° ' $°N I N i • �o • Oa 08 PoN • . . .wC.Y . . . • oP ,n- 4 N, i I i 4I I r•' i' r'1r 1� ..ivk t 61 � 1 m•' -P�+ t� 1 1 I ' •a � y n 1 N I: m° In is I O .Yiyh.! i T S , � • ~ i a i •1.', I Y ; I i r Nr , >R m a A T T a a a a a un o s no 0 oo oe o yyy I $11°i vv wa a�IllyryyryyryIryIryIry,,,, I I � J. Y 0 � � I m m• T P- F O In i, L •� N m S n - 1 1 I 1{n qm—: yT.pa1 i I DD= II' I n m ' I I I I "•.I 3 ' m.. as I � y I � N E, 2..c no 0o Ion y � x I ur�gaoy wi X I � II 1 i s I { I o• I m a A T T a a a a a un o s no 0 oo oe o yyy I $11°i vv wa a�IllyryyryyryIryIryIry,,,, I I � J. Y 0 � � I m m• T P- F O In i, L •� N m S n - n... I qm—: yT.pa1 i DD= II' I n m ' I I I I "•.I I � y E, 2..c no 0o Ion y � x ii ur�gaoy wi >w s II 1 i s I I I I I e "- IPyr tO.. "s"`: ::Iat9ur ! <.. •�'. %ii- •J'a:np -nr w R,. .w• t'.•1•^.r.•.3d 4 t: lA .1 rI 1 wa] t. .r e b 1 K P � m a P r' py T r i 1 y s i IwJ 41O }N n0 Aa nJ yfr I � in Nai +L ry Nlp. iW <= ON IA Mfzz y1� TO M P Pr a A /! 1 M i I �02 a�• on it u •Na+u w1 M� a p.l `Zw IV o +o Pw wu ea YP • z 1 j iw 9 YN P IA T WW O W 0v Op• OU• 0• a pW• q0• + y I �.r. "•y;. - `PISS =O ..,x' oPJOIIO OJOPO IProic0 a} I I � A 1•I CI fly r•. � 1 1 C O O� OT T~ A. I , � aSWa a +a as as wrai na as S� dw gS5 ' I O( uu WN Oa YP O A-1 M±� 4/ I ilnw I I "'• 0.9.. 00• VP ~N.Iw UQNPCrr H. O• 1 � 1 I i I 1 wa] t. .r e b 1 K P � m a P r' py T r i 1 y s i IwJ 41O }N n0 Aa nJ yfr I � in Nai +L ry Nlp. iW <= ON IA Mfzz y1� TO M P Pr a A /! 1 M i I �02 a�• on it u •Na+u w1 M� a p.l `Zw IV o +o Pw wu ea YP • z 1 j iw 9 YN P IA T WW O W 0v Op• OU• 0• a pW• q0• + y I �.r. "•y;. - `PISS =O ..,x' oPJOIIO OJOPO IProic0 I b r NI :$1 l- ri ■ ■ I I I I I ,r I II { P rz is TeJJ � ■ ■ MM is �.1 N SS fi a t4 �y II N r I 4 (1 S O9 sv N NNE P11 WNW 1 - �° u 1 lu u O fin. ~ j 9 m n 0 N sy r m 9 I ` 1 n O n 1 � �Ay S li ya 1 1, i i= e in n i w 1� 1 IIII�I ;I�i I � I I y it 1s { P rz is TeJJ � n U K MM is �.1 N SS fi a t4 �y II N r I 4 (1 S O9 sv N NNE P11 WNW 1 - �° u 1 lu u O fin. ~ j 9 m n 0 N sy r m 9 I ` 1 n O n 1 � �Ay S li ya 1 1, i i= e in n i w 1� 1 IIII�I ;I�i I � I I y it 1s a.. d.•Y A A A O fin. ~ j 9 m n 0 N sy r m 9 I ` 1 n O n 1 � �Ay S li ya 1 1, i i= e in n i w 1� 1 IIII�I ;I�i I � I I y it 1s v'1 '( I �} I .p ,Y II� :A lit I I I I I I � I I I I , I I I I I '1 y i P�oo _L aip r��n sslL lsr YwLmO -^•, ^ ^r I � I I D � I W I I � I ..N a I i Aji f I w ~W N I pN w(pa�� S np Oaa�aW adpyYya .Oy�a aiW WYWV YYaiY Y� PPPP VVNM NY NI..rrl,f♦ l W,w. -Y �rM[]YPMOMr MOi; 00�VNI+fP{• OF M1Mp NpUM NP /.OSI^��I�MOfrMP000ap ON ♦�Cr °f0 VOPOO I i I I i I I _ I iW =I O II IY OO 00 O O I T 11 Vu aa��NV ID S I_ ,Y OO M�OlI N � i y n OOpP YI O II II I I I I I I I I � �Y.LI�Y Y •1 :9N y t t, .MOP l lY P� y I +Cw ^ O FI � �I m b 1y�yrr. y � ^r O II Y P I�I+•NAC� -'� T ° i i w w .I I� - AI i a I I -.oL'i A N O O o 1 1 I G ' ' P i i ; I I , ,I V O 1 1w rxiww�mS V i T Jnaw i A i i i0 Yo % I II M e a � � - h• Y Y S A A P IINV� ( (•� I I � �Y.LI�Y Y •1 :9N Tl I OC I I �PV I I v I I I 1 l.ua fN iP M I w IIIIO I le o I I ��• w c I I I �: • i I I i I I I I II I • J. I I I f I I I OC I I �PV I I v I I I 1 l.ua fN II,' i rOR ' I ` +p I I � I I 1 I i I I I I , L I I 1 I I I I I ( ,�•�' I �I� 4 8L I I I i e• .,11` 1 ' i •IVI„ •e Y s m 2.1 rI I �v l� I P O j 9 n o L3a 1 m P eM� 1 r J 11 J �• (� I IN A 1..AA A n I I In V I I ' JUTI P I I bNIy " .aayJZI Tii�n in . , In�: +Irr in .ii1 +`I NT zn T� : npmI � m o J N i ' nT Ty rI► - Z ^J DTn N rD t0 J' C^N�C amY NN_ j i ' iGw1iD JIA1 r N9 mb OJ(� (196{ SM I m r r iFI r3 i[.�rp znim^.z. j? j D b S n�Inir 3 =nml; Nl r I M I T I N' N� •'.Inn 1 n �n'°I INIInI n n §n onn nni � D �T SD A D D'f NAADD i � N N ( zmlwnr � i N M M '.i1 �n9 M�NN 1 2 P100 O O On OJ 00000000 li f o�aLo$e��e �e� +e $$Weaeeeae s % �i'ea I:owsu °w n�'..W.1"i+Wyyy w�iNClua j Ar I r0{OO J�P NrPi O.IP VJ WN�•OeOJ 1 0 I fl } p10+ JpNON �O�IOPWPr MMOVNY�`!0 1 y N • JJ JO111I11W e�NrDJNL•oW WOwDeoOD rJOfO�.1e VPJPOON�.lOOJ00lOf0000 ' p4, Ry ' Yp is m L' 1 rr� `y ,p OW PJ JN PP P! y0 P! NP yW YJ MJ. Nd JYIIII..��000Nr Jy Nu wP pOyYr M 1 B O O 11 Ny Or N I>°� r I tPN nt F1 rp YC m• aM >a�Y D 11Im 'i liw r 2•. YD aOF�0Yw2�r} IJmO ssr�"�+ znt�� � � MT Tz � n � • z w 1n a J a N-r e > i L�� T L1 _Y T S m l YC >ti C IFI j ObCCCIe� i } 'r' ll lM �•NOr>nT MO IMy�1^1 a (� _itn ni .��`` NrI I{{L T air � ��O ° Nr N< Y 1 I I ml O i NS>O r O�O Y d�O � OMMaJT JSNe S 1 ` ^ II ' II » > 1T1y11L+I. r S U TYS4r s°n C 'N �O O O 1 D r.. r E ff TP D Z•n r<w"'�n41�T Hn InG r} YG ; Y N nOn I� o. oml ^n iiw -ii lai•m ii �L'mri a II { I L-'II I nm OY i OY M> iM�aT ya MS OS¢Y ~<HY �ma •a� i�.+wo �Y °">'i I nN J��NN m�o•°n b`�I m0 JS¢y JFV' mlrl�i Z. TyN 'N YN _TS¢ V = 9> nn1jl{rP•�npJgFM m 2-10 a I i>�`MI'•YY IEni 8e� S m1FF1��na�J+' .iY .i• z 0 TNTd2 c I ���'•/'1•• n n •Nn "b�1anr O i IIREiiYE n m z i }In nn ci�nn "'IN,• n ; rzf T t^ o Kmi i•� ri..� °o'n ^ _ li � a +• a' a �a as N¢ i � ,^, N .i, •in N N N� G N i N o00 ' I I �• i 00 0 $w 00 �ok.no eMMMMMM on ou on on o anbe it a° a FiG $o' °J ww ::peo NoOMr iw iw aM w :==z nla'° it i urao5 iw�. i.0 �o °•em :. z i I I I Y Y Y•rr ��i I ° �o N ��o �o ° 00 • o oy .yo �u�.i.Y. 1+°i�•°ilal ur °. i�> "' mJFFFov o r.lro I � rOrO I i wY�oa ��� I Or do ou OJ OP win o rOf.INO pjnwu < 1 0ppposy li .� YJij^O. OU OOOOdpU I; I I I I x.1.3'r In vio COPY.. ..� IL AfOYC/.31011 M ALCONWJC SMAN tJ Dftg) T. N Abadk .CanN 1101 - I S.vaeA CNl, Hit/ Wn Eet.uttlltl0 no h wS. A. t. n11t51 a IM $9(3) Off TALE BLLN i YIYL A.p.l.d.. S.. I" ❑ Baca Dew. 7/1/36 `7 51111f F4j��..�.� Iw.i 9 NA4[(S) Of AMOCO TW le.atr Or. - A6P,WA9iR. Na.an A. 1 r(n(3) OF TRANLKt10.C1) ti M lG New Annual fee 16.00 1 l..aiw N I..i... -t.►i. b Stir 9071 ACChinald Ave. O,.d IY CN. Crrl TWX S 6l.w Tv.. N Ik.w �� M IL.wf 11 r 1 r. f. M.wwwlrwWN d.fdrfi I0.1I... 1.. d.r i.gN"f 0 f Ak...6 .wb . mfA.i.w N M 6.0...... O.• _BLB9. S, .iawe r ✓y A..T r... 11.Ig a'tt]'•.wn•w....f.10 ti A"p ev (N Ns .ry ..re. H. STAt6 Of CAWOONA ce/ w San bmcnu Ole< ay 7/71166 ... I r .w... T.Is �..rrY .1Y we•.... M ..nr1 ..J. r ..Mw. rti .Y..n Y� r L. en•. rMr.. V .....i w.. V .. .� � .Y.r...r..r. r .... r .fr. .Y.a .r I.p.... ww ....Yw O w Y r.. wY.. r. b .r.r M .•.. Y .Y.r . r ..r.. r. r ..+r � Mq . MUCAW _ ll AMUC � 1 1) I l • AfMKATWH BY TRAXWUOA 11 StATi Of CAONtle4 C. N ou. rw w..tl r.... LY. r ..r..r .... . W.. r .w. /..•. 1A. F'N N.W /.Im TAb livl7 >.7yarwel Uw W6 _� _ -- Aw.dwa ❑ b." ❑rv.o.rfw•A ❑ COMB AW 7 /71 /Ys . UD r_ 0►...v6 v..4-, ..N - L ..•r Oiw r. A.MfIM - , I .. S M N.=. M (boS 1 IARKY.r �ixorxn: Ro3� Artr:rKacn�Q�c. (:AL. (INLAND CENTik) lirA uµ6r p hbPYtTj+ f uw7'tY igi.'Gcu.Ib. kwlk snit wcee>,T c.0 t3K Saes I MORTIJ, *4W NSTRIAL R*K acts I sauTH: aF�teE ' AlPrawiupares ly EAST ;6WXA,DnsTr 1" P4*< 0 VA N- Ja. M kT 4 G90MAL In ihr; (VACA.KT) J M VV;4L TA¢K PART PtK3 �Q :s. �NCOJMenl6d Cl�piTli/ Q FtcuwsgiP s ,uL Y f NO �1. ED = -I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 2U, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Bond, and Notice of Completion Tract 12523 - Located on the north side of Leman, east of Archibald. DEVELOPER Eastwind I1 Joint Venture 1365 M. Foothill Blvd., Suite 6 Upland, California 91786 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $47,590 00 1 Faithful Performance Band 'Road) $246,400.00 Faithful Performance Band (Storrs Drain) $229,5DO.00 RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the 10% maintenance bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Complet on and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond 'Road) $246,400 and Faithful Performance Band (Storm Drain) $229,500. Respect ull s bmitt vw-/c LBH:CB:dlw Attachments JAL .Y i.:I. •T'N.Y�. � �� f✓:::. I 1 -1 x� RECOADING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: t CITY CLERK CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTIC£ IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner, of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which Interest or estate p is: Tract No. 12523 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. O Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 20th day of August, 1986, there was completed on the t hereinafter described real property the %, •t of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: k, Tract No. 12523 4. The name of the original contra-toe for the work of improvement as a whole was: Tract No. 12523 - Lightner Oavelopment Company 5. The real property referred to herein is situ_,ted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Tract No. 12573 Y Located CITY 4F RANCHOO CUCMIONGA, a . munlc pal corpora ton, Owner ,.0 Lloyd B. HUbbS, i y, ng near.; 4" .• r 1' � "' =• 'S ' - • 1: - ;, r.n . - y. {fig. ;,,,.,-saki Lr�'{^*Y'a RESOLUTION N0. +' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT.• OF V.NCHO F CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 12523 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A n, '•?� NOTICE OF COMPLETIOH•FOR THE WORK ?' WHEREAS, the construction of public :aproveoents for Tract 12523 have been completed to the satisfaction'of the City Engineer; and % WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion 1s regdired to be flied, certifying x•" the work complete. ? R"' NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and + 2 the C11.4, Engineer 1s authorized to sign and file a Notice of Complet,on with ' P. the County Nscarder of San Bernardino County. P+ t C iJ .5 M . �t 1Gta,,44n•t {R��f�s Z�:+'��a .Cl �a`K'�•'!e: _ _i�F •t +'.n#A'aJr�•a_i'e.._,a' 1, 1 I I �. ,.lmt) ALA D I XlnT ^ ATTI A 11^XT/ A STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion 9 A�-Ivn MWWSj Parcel Nap 8477 •• Nt,rth side Laaita Court, between Hellman and Amethyst. D6'VFLDi David A. Stephenson 9404 Lomita Court Rancho Cucamonga, Caitfornia 91701 Release: FaithfulPer`ormance Bond (Road) $4,300 RECOMMENDATION.* The required street Improvements have bean completed in an acceptable manner and it Is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, accept the 10% maintenance bond, wthorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of CompleN,n and authorize the city Clerk to release the Faithful Performanc and in the amount of $4,300. �espe,SAfully subbmmitpd, LBH:CE VIw attachments 1977 3 W ar 3 W Q r RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO °UCA.HONGA P 0. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 YHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p. 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 a , NOTICE OF 111pLEIION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1 The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is Parcel Map 8477 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI!GNGA, 9320 -C Base Line.. Road, P. 0. Box 007, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 20th day of August, 1996, there was cocpleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Parcel Map 8477 + 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Parcel Map 8477 - David A. Stephenson j S. 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of ' Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as s follows: y Parcel Map 8477 *• µ: Th, street address of said property is N tai vex i CITY OF PANCHO carp ration. O e municipal corporation, Owner l a Lloyd u s, y n9 n y+��. "i,.FY �+la'n�•^ f5itn+.. ���� �•i s'�,M1. .✓.R�,`.1 :i!_ 5: ='• �r RESOLUTION NO. 8(r :)L%Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMEWTS FOR PARCEL MAP 807 AND AUTHORinUG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 8477 has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorizra "o sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San P vino County. (-w ,r��r E W;' m O F - wk August 20, 1906 City Council and City Manager imr Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Michael 0. Long, Seiior Public Works Inspector Author+zation to achvertize °Notice Inviting Bids" for the Improvement of Arrow Route and 9th Street from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue Attached for Council consideration is a resolution approving the Plans and Specifications and authorizing the City Clerk to advertize and receive bids for the subject project. The project consist mainly of Asphalt Concrete overlay of the existing driving surfac: with some minor widening, curb and gutter installation, and removal and replacement of failed pavement areas. Plans and specifications were prepared by Associated Engineering, Incorporated and reviewed by staff. The engineer's estimate is $265,524.00 It is proposed that the project be funded by System Development Fees. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Counc'1 adopt the attached resolution approving the Plans and Specifications, and authorizing the advertising Notice Inviting Bids for the project. Respectfully submitted, LBH:MDL w Attachments 9v"t ° �j �, ?, -i� � Y J� .� r, f E�.: a e �i' 3`` a ry ty J''. —, F' �� �. {.. r•- f; +4' :'t 1h. �, �t ,7.� -�w e .� ' �,� • � ;�' '. �A3- d '�. {qr' r:4• 4. j: i s „_,: b �-_ ,r, RESOLUTION NO. D(p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 'ARROAII ROUTE AND 9TH PLANS STREETSPECIFICATIONS IHPROVEHENTS BETWEEN VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVEMIE', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECT1dG THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIUS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for 'Arrow Route and 9th Street Improvements, between Vineyard Avenue and Archibald Avenue.'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized aid directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified i,. the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: •NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROJOSALS• Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernaroinj County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the ;Ff;ces of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 11 day of Se Camber 198 sealed bids or Avenueals frx 'Arrow uo to said Cltytreet mprov�ents, between Vineyard Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately In the office of the City C1erK, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. t Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, •aid for Construction of Arro,. Rate and 9th Street improvements, between Vineyard Avenue and Archibald '1 Avenue". 1. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance :iith the 1 provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapte. 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing IDq L Y rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less then the general prevailing rate of per then wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director, of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California Is required to i has determined such general prevailing rates cf per diem wages. Copies or such prevailing rates of per them wages are on file in the office of thu City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, end are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a c6py of such determinations to be r ^'ted at the ,lob site. The Contra( shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twer rive dollare ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employe.. for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paia less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisicns in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amendeo •equires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project end wh4•:h administers the apprenticeship promram in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to ,journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the ,joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 3o Is D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,Journeymen. The Contractor 1s required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch cffices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California havi.g to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor rode. Contract:- agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The tidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified :heck, or 1idder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10x) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidJer will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rarcho Cucamnga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the tow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder.' SID ' The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the ' contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (00%) of the contract • price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equil to fifty percent Q4 (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment .TG' '• of claims for any materials or surplies furnished for tht. performance of the F{ wort contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done :hereon, and the Contretor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he uarrieo compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be i done ender contract which may be entered into between Mar and the said City of Y Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said vork. No proposal will be considered fret a Contactor who is not licensed in accordance with Lice provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California ' t Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et, seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to wham a proposal form has not been d issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Ba.e Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho : ucamonga and payment of $15.00, sa4d $15.00 is nonrefundat P. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications - will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, • together with an additional no reimbursable payment of $5.00 to cover, the cost of mailing charges and overhead. l`. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General " Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work • contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon, the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's tole cost and expense, substitute "= authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. e' By order of the Council of the City of Randio Cucamonga. California. ;- Oat:d this 20th day of August • 1986. ' 'af, 4w i M1i. 1 r a. h \zi• SID CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1% STAFF REPORT' , c � C 0 0 y A DATE: August 20, 1986 iqn , TO: City Council and City Manager ' FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer -'x BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUSJECT: Approval of Agreemeit for Installation of Public Improvement - and Dedication between John P. Aaxldt and Emma J. Amodt and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Amodt's Property Fronting Hamilton Street The attached subject agreeme.it between the City and Mr, and Mrs. Amodt J provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, street pavements and the extension of an existing fence on the Southerly end of the property faring h:,milton Avenue. The Anodts have agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easemtat to allow for the widening and improvement of Hamilton Street in return for the construction of said improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with thr y' City's Capital Improvement Project for widening and reconstruction of Hamilton street from Hermosa Avenue to Cartilla Avenue, Hermosa Avenue from Victoria Street to 19th Street and the improvement of Hermosa Park. y' RECOw— RUkT10M: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Agr_emen'. for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between John and Emma Amodt and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted, i + LBH4mc i Attacieaents +V 0 y. r1 J;,K 33 .3? .1 i-, � {�- o• . A' t' ��• 5 j� ��r ,� 3.' �� t �.R 1 � � � Ir �1 . yam. f� W� 11 .,1 .. � .� � m: ly � `il: An �. J � t£ i ,F ; .y � b• v �9 r L nay' sr :' ''Ris ' •' Yv � • � • .�,.; .:.'•_%.t�J ✓�' .�� e• •T,- c.�„� -.'= ''pis'£. 1ii•i.::Fo. � .. AL (jCy fi.7 •'�l ,ur�, •:,.■ .,li'74i. ..•lwW,I.i' %�l:i%•r , it .Mann . nns • ' r � . C A ,•i NINF"I GEN' 5TKcr=T N C7513N'G `LrAWMA:T..W ewl, -VIIY 19B7.B4c 6o1K /lle 1. F VAIHSCOtt F ASSOCIATES. INC. oe��rCl {nrCOCAMlf. G' Il1I'F/A'\`„-+Y {. {t!' • tm WIN . �bLL w��.d� . u.e nnw� IV4`K.f [/ C�Ni%'w1.L7 V' nws woo,i ic�'Siu uwI {i� •a• �•• �n�� EXHIBIT'•6" � t t •� .�17 huts. 1'•SO'_ ela tBGte� L - _a - AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1986 by and between the City of Rancho fucamenga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY`) ind John P. Amodt and Emma J. Amodt. husband and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to ai *OWNER") for the installation of certain public Iwo.mvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, street pavements, street - "s and extension of existing fence to the Easterly pn.perly line along a portion . °•milton Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga A. Recitals (1) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for. and presently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Hermosa Avenue from Victoria Street to 19th Street and along Hamilton Street from Hermosa Avenue to Cartilla Avenue (the Hermosa- 6amilton Project " hereinafter in this Agreement). (ii) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel Nos. 202- 201 -27. 202 - 201 -35 and 202 - 201 -36 fronting along Hamilton Street and 19th Street, which property is within the limits of the Hermosa - Hamilton Project and described as follows: A.P.N. 202- 201 -27 + The West 50 feet of the East 135 feet of that portion of the No. theast 1/4 of Section 35, Township I North, Range 7 West, San �`• Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to Government Survey Jescribed as follows: Commencing at a point 3,936.7 feet North and 693 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence East 627 feet; thence South 388.8 feet; thence West 627 feet; thence North 388.8 feet to the Point of Beginning. t a4',� Seri �IY:i?�L A.P.N. 202 - 201 -35 and 202 - 201 -36 The East 85 feet of that portion of the Northeast 114 of Section 35. Township 1 North, Range 7 West, Zan Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to Government Survey, described as .follows: Beginning at a point 3.956.7 feet North and 693 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35; thence running East 627 feet; thence South 388.8 feet; thence Nest 627 feet; thence North 388.8 feet to the Point of Beginning. Excepting therefrom any street or roadway easements. (iii) OWNER desires to participate in the Hermosa - Hamilton Project so as to dedicate necessary Rights -of -Nay related to street frontage lmproverents along owners properties ou Hamilton Street ( "the Amodt Purtion• hereinafter) CITY is willing to include the Amodt Portion within the Hermosa - Hamilton Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and UNER as follows: 1. OWNER shall execute a Deed of Easement in favor nv CITY for street right -of -Way and related purposes in form and crntent identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. 2. CITY is authorized to cause OWNER's Deed of Easement to to recorded forthwith upon execution of this Agreement and City shall furnish copy of the recorded Easement Deed to the OWNER upon recordation. 3. CITY shall Include the Amodt Portion as a part of the construction of the Hermosa- Hamilton Project and shall cause curbs, gutters, street pavements and street lights to be installed to accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. 4. CITY agrees to extend existing fence on the southerly end of said properties to the Easterly property line of APN 202 - 201 -36. If removal of the existing Eucaiyptus tree is necessary to extend said fence, then said tree shall be cut up into fire wood and stacked on the OWNER's property. Y• '� ` -� S. OWNER agrees to ylant to CITY, its elected officials. officers, ,Y ' agents, employees and nntractors such rights of entry and /er temporary `+ a construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to �^t cause the completion of the Amadt Portion. `LL 6. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 7. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any terms or provisions of this Agreement„ the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall bh entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 8. This Agreement is binding upon and shall Inure to the benefits of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever tt.e context requires or admits. 9. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained In this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if It is ;n writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By._ Jeffrey King. Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut a et, ty erk ri:l y xL. PROPERTY OWNER John P. Nmodt Emma J. Amodt (JtL✓YNI._. �1 Cti,,, o APPROVED AS TO FOAM: ty ttorney + `� 4' X4,'1• #*### R###### 1#* AR# i###*## R*###!*## Hfrtlt# Mft # # ####frll # #kHf!##1rM#####/# R# #N# STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss 'OUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Y t On 19 .before me S �• Y, a •' +Y t: 7 Y, 1� t fi i a the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAL me to be the persons who' execu municipal corporation, and acknov executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Mayer and City Clerk, respectively, of a municipal corporation, and known to within instrument on behalf of said to me that such municipal corporation Notary Signature COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ss On thi the _�� day. of :514ty before —)14 eb (>O proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(:) whose name(s) " subscribed to the within instrument and acknowleged that n�� execute t. WITNESS MY HAND ANUTAL' SEAL. OFFICIAL SEAL JUDftH A AOLo0 NOTMt WaUC• WIIck son aaa ow:m W msa wV•+Ili 4th NOTE: WHEN DOCUl4ENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ACOYE ACKNO''A.EDGEMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTNERSHIP ACKHOWLEOGEMENT IS x WID-- T. _4_ 39 'r 5 it P M i Rl tly R iry RESOLUTION NO. B ` ' -D L4 a A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA; ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JOHN P. A.W.JDT AND ENMA J. AMODT AND i,UTHORiZING THE MAYOR AND CiTY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, tie City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction .f frontage improvements to conjunction with the Hermosa-Hamilton Reconstruction Project; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, street pavements and the extension of existing fence for If* Amodt's property fronting Hamilton Street to be made part of the Hermosa- ranllton Reconstruction Project; and WHEREAS, John P. and Ecru J. Amodt have to dedicate Right -of -Nay as reimbursement to the City for said improvements NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City o• Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. / ILA l f�. ^ =W�32 via�9 R+C� ter. f cif, J 'S { ? DATE: it T0: FROM: BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbION0A STAFF REPORT ,p �lcwatq,� .,taut. c August 20, 1986 € MS Z City Council and City Manager t9n Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Engineering Aide Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement; and Securities for Tract Nos. 12525, 12739, and 12741, located on the wrest side of Center Avenue, between Arrow Highway and 26th Street, submitted by Deer Creek Partners On March 6, 1985, the City Council approved the Final Map, Improvement A9ret. -nts and Securities for Tract Nos. 12525, 12739 and 12741 The subject tracts are located on the west side of Center Avenue between Arrow Highway and 26th Street. The developer, Deer Creek partners, is requesting an extension of their improvement agreements and securities due to economic reasons that are causing them to phase their development to meet sales demands. It is recomnended that Council approve the improvement extension agreements anJ securities. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Improvement Extension Agreements and Securities for Tract Nos. 12525, 1 ?739 and 12731. Respectfully submitted, LBH:JA:f Attachments J y/ 'l, �:� m' q� d' t r: 2 .,r WAI DEER CREEK PARTNERS July 29, 1986 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention Ms. Cathy A. Becker Public Works Inspector Re: Improvement Extension Agreeaents for Road Improvements Tracts 12741, 12739, 12525 Arroe Route Highway & Center Avenue Dear Hs. Becker: �C;�IVED :ItY OF ,VICHO CUCRUONA.I C:GISEERING OIVISIOB Enclosed please fird, Wtrlplicate, the above subject Improvement E.tenslon Agreerents along with our check in the sncunt of $753.00 per your letters of July 22nd. Offsltes and first phase construction took longer than we had anticipated a year ago, but work is progressing well We had originally planned to build out Tract 12741 and 1252E successively, but our sales rate is such that we are now planning to build those ewo tracts concurrently beginning the latter part of August or early Septe+rber. In eftact, what we had originally anticipated as a 4 phase residential develapnxnt has instead become a 3 phase developrent to meet sales demand. We therefore request that the City approv- our requests for extension of the road imrovement agreements. Yours truly, CR CREEK PARTERS t"IN a nSGoing, Jr. President W S Going, Inc. General Partner JVB Enclosures - r q3 143 WEST MAIN STREET. SURE 200. TUSTIN. ^.AWFORNL% 92690 (714) 131.7507 - } w . ) 0 Al RESOLUTION 110. ?& -ay3 e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORRIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS SECURITIES FOR TRACT NOS. 12525, 12739 AND 12741 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreements executed on July 29, 1986 by Deer Creek Partners as Developer, for the Improvement of public right -of -Nay adjacent to real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Center Avenue between Arrow Highway and 6th Street; and WHEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, describes in said Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in con;anction with the development of said real property referred to as Tract Has. 12739, 12741, 12525; and Y.HEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuccmanga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. i , a s, z� N DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: L (^.TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CW*16� Lc STAFF REPORT August 20, 1986 z City Council and City Manager 1977 Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Associated Engineers for the preparation of Contract Drawings, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate for the Excavation of Alta Loma Rasin No. 1 in an amount not to exceed $7,500 00 to be drawn from Redevelopment and Systems Development Funds On June 20, 1986 Associated Engineers prepared and submitted to the City a proposal for the enlargement and excavation of Alta Loma Basin No. 1. Their proposal includes the following tasks: 1. Review the "as- built• contours resulting from completion of the recent Assessment District 84 =2 project together with Flood Control District plans, and propose a project to optimize the enlargement of Basin No. 1. 2. .,sist City in obtaining Flood Controls concurrence in the proposed project, including modifying the proposed project if necessary to meet Flood Controls requirements. 3. Prepare contract drawings, using existing plans as a basis, specifications and final Engineer's Estimate. All items except Item 2, will be performed for the fixed fee amount of $6,000.00. Because Item 2, cannot be q'iantified, Associated proposes to do it on an hourly basis conforming to their standard hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit •D" of the attached agreement. For budgeting purpose Item 2 will not exceed $1,500.00. Funds for this project will be drawn from Redevelopment AnA Sjst,•ms Development. A J. FS Air Ya 0 f ' i . � arm, %i r'•_ !., ��' TO: City Council and City Manager August 20, 1906 Page 2 ! RECDNEMDATIOU '• It is recomaended that City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement awarding the above described Excavation of Alta Loma Basin Ho. 1 Project to Associated Engineers for a fee not to exceed 27,500.00 to be drawn from Redevelopment and Systems Development Funds. R specyulty submitt 4 LBH:LEH:dlw Attachments 1 z r °T 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUWIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20. 1986 c T0: City Cc:ncil and City Manage- 17 FROM: Lloyd B. Huobs, ,:ity Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Approval and execution of contract documents for the Irmrovemort of Highland Avenue from 200 feet west of the Alta Loma Channel to 150 feet west of Cambridge Avenue At the regular Council meeting of August 6, 1986, Council awarded the subject project to the apparent lowest responsible bidder, Vance Corporation, for the bid amour: of $172,585.60. The bidder has submitted the required bond and insurance documents arpl has executed the Contract Agreement. Staff has reviewed the contract documents and they appear to be complete and acceptable. RECCMMERIklTION It is recommended that City Council approve and accept the contract documents and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Contract Agreement for the project. It is further recommended that City Council authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $190,000.00 ($112,685.60 plus 10% contingency) from Gas Tax runs for the proiect. _ Respectfully submitted, ze,�� LBH: F .dlw Attarhnents 1% c 7 V y'. `: �. 3 M i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cl c..Al STAFF REPORT° 9 DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Carter Associates, Inc., for the preparation of a Pavement Management System for Local Street and a Curb. Gutter and Sidewalk Inventory for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in an amount not to exceed $38,350.00 to be drawn from Gas Tax Funds Carter Associates, Inc. has submitted a proposal for a pavement management system far the local streets and a curb, gutter and sidewalk inventory for the City. The purpose of this program is to define local pavement maintenance needs, strategies, procedures; establish evaluation and software procedures; conduct an inventory of the City's system; develop and implement the related software; train City staff !nd provide other services necessary to bring and maintain the systems to full service. An inventory of existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks will also be performed. T*i scope of work is estimated to be completed within a period of 10 to 12 weeks. The proposed fee for the protect is not to exceed $38,350.00 and is to be drawn from the Gas Tax Funds. RECOMMENDATION It is reccmaended that City Council approve the attached Professional Services Agreement awarding the above- deser' bed project to Carter Associates, Inc. for a fee not to exceed $38,350.00 to le paid from the Gas Tax Furds. Re e o ly subz4c LBH:LEH Attachments Lf /A7 3�^ '•Y z a A . ,,. ..c. o A Mi"Un 011 AMnNrA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Managar FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer By: Dave Slevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Tree Se ice Agreemente�Contract with CUnitedWide ePacifStreet . Corporation of Santa Fe Springs. Per previous Council action, sealed bid DroposalS for cne subject agreement were solicited, received and opened in the office of the City Clerk and subsequently the original contract was awarded to United Pcific as year by pyedri basisrnifagreement bot partiesidagree, and providing that th t no increase in excess of ten percent (10X) annually is requested by the contractor. During the past twelve months the contractor has performed very satisfactorily and in fact staff has never delt with a better equipt or" efficient tree maintenance contractor. The contractor is requesstino r ten percent (10X) increase over the pr vious de rices. We have attached a copy of the original the contract unit prices. In addition, we have atta.:hed three originals of the Extension Agreement executed by the contractor, for Council corsideration. RECOPKMAnON It is recommended that the City Council approve the City Nile Street Tree Service Agreement with United Pacific Corporation for t. fiscal year 1986 -87 for an amount not to exceed S1D0,000.00 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement on behaif of the City. rRespeicctt ull.ly�aubnitte , LBH:BD:dlw Attachments \y r ,.r v :C� Jrx --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA• STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICF, irector of Community Devblopment SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO PROFESSIOdAL SERVICES CONTRACTS Revisions to the professional design services contracts with John Carl Warnecke. Associates and Greenlaw Design Associates are necessary as a result of changes in scope of services pertaining to the increased scope of the project as described in the attached documents. The contract airendments have all changes highlighted for ease of reference. Once adopted, the change, will be appended to tha original contracts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City COunfil approve amendments to the two contracts referenced above with authorization from the Civic Facilities Fund. Respectfully sud'itted. Jae& L„.. .." Director of Community DdvelopmJnt JL:Jk } 5 a• t. FIRST AMENDMEIIT TO AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES RANCHO CUCA?WGA PUBLIC SAFETY ACID CIVIC FACILITY i, } This First Amendment entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this _ day of , 1986, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner' cr 'City" and John Carl Warnecke and Associates, hereinafter referred to as "Architect". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the owner and the Architect wish to amend the Agreement for 't Architectural Se ^vices (the 'Agreement ") which was entered into on October 3, r .t 1984, due to an increase in the scope of work of the Public Safety and Civic Facility; and WHEREAS, the Agreement allows for amendments to occur under Article ' 4, Section 4.1. NOW, T'IEREFORE. the Forties hereto agree as follows: a 1. The project description set forth on page 1 of the Agreement is amonded to read as follows: The Project is a new Civic Center and Public Safety Facility of approximately 124,500 square feet to be built on the approximately seven acre parcel of land at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This facility will include a City Council Chamber, offices and work areas for all City services Including law enforcement, all public counters, public clrculation and ceremonial spaces,interior lardscaping, and other such specific spaces as are defined during the Programing phase of the work. Tha exterior i5 devslopaent of the Project will include landscapiny, both hardscage and 15% � � c r I ' • softscape, of the entire site (including parking structure); a 120.000 square 1 soot parking structure which incluJes a secured parking area for police; '• visitor parking; a parking area for City personnel; and appropridte surfcce pedestrian connection to adjacent Foothill Law and Justice Center. ¢ 2" Architect's Basic Services described in Article 1 of the Agreement shell include a Security and Elevator consultant as part of the Architect's Basic Services. 3. The following paragraphs of the Agreement are amended to read as follows: 1.2,4 Architect shall develop schematic site plan which will include the currei,cly proposed Civic Center building and Public Safety facility, parking structure, at grade parking area, site development and allowance for future expansion to the Civic Center and a future cosunity r cultural facility. ! 1.4.1 Architect shall prepare working drawings and specifications in coordination with civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering consultants as well as landscape architectural design, irrigation, audio /visual, lighting design, security systev and elevators settino firth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. f 1.7.2 Providing sdrvices relative to future facilitiet, systems and equipment which are not intended to be constructed during the Construction .,v Phase except for site planning that i,"corporates a future cultural facility J j -. •�t and future. Civic Center building expansion. 2 w " I+ r 1 4 { 1.8.1 The schedule for phase completion shall now indicate the following: Phase Duration Construction documents to 50% completion 12 weeks Construction documents r, to 100% completion 12 weeps Bidding 6 weeks ` Construction 72 weeks 4.1 For basic services and such other services as described In this Agreement in connection with tha Project, the Owner agrees to pay the ` Architect a fixed fee of $1,085,213. ' 4.2 The percentage compensation for each of the six (6) phases described In Article I shall be as follows: Prograaming /Financial Analysis Phase: $ 65,000 ( 6 %) Schematic Design Phase: $ 141,000 ( 13 %) L Design Development Phase: $ 152,000 ( 14 %) d Construction Documents Phase: $ 407,000 ( 43 %) Bidding Phase: $ 33,000 ( 3 %) ti Construction Phase: 227,213 UAL $1,085,213 (100;) (percentages are approximate) 4. Other than as expressly amended hereby the Agreement and each and 'A,, every term and provision thereof shall remain In pull force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partle3 hereto have caused this First Agrndment to +' Agreement for Architectural Services to be executed this day • M :'a . 36-,3 of 1986. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSULTANT ;a Jeffrey King, mayor Date: ._ BY: b ATTEST: Title :_, j� D, trt: Beverly A. Cuthelet, City Clark J APPROVED AS TO FORK: •, By: Date: City Attorney e I VI1 Yet a i i. .. 4.1 1� ?.d5 {f`Yi \� � f�Y:.x •f� :J ° >ln .ifR.. \. a� �-.: l,n Fnl FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR INTERIOR DESIGN SERVICES RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC SAFETY AND CIVIC FACILITY This First finendment entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this day of , 1986- between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, hureinaftar 1 reterred to as "City and GREENLAw DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter referred to as 'Consultant'. AITHESSETH: NHERCAS, the City and the Consultant wish to amend the Professional Services Agraement for interior design services (the 'Agreement') which was entered into on May 1, 1985, due to an increase in the scope of work of the Futlic Safety acd Civic Facility, and ? WHEREAS, the agreement allows for amendment to be approved under Section 14. NON, THER:FORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 The following paragraph of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: 3. CITY egreea as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $23, 300.00 for the performance of the services required hereuider. This sum shall cover the cost of all stiff time and all other direct and indi ;ect costs or fees, !ncluding• ; r A �1 i ! ly 11 r r the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Paymr.nt to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth belos. 2. The project description set forth on page 1 of Exhibit A of the Agretment is amended to reflect that the proposed Public Safety and civic Fnc111ty is 0 approAimately 124,500 square feet in size. 3. Other than As expressly emended hereby tha Agreement and each and every .arm and provision thereof shalt remain in ,full force and 'effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Agreement for Interior Design Services to be executed thic day of 1986. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSULTANT ' Jeffrey King, Mayor Greenlaw Detign Associates, Inc. J BY: T17LE: • DATE: DATE: «Pr f t. I 4F„t� ,A ATTEST: I II Beverly A. Authilet, City Clerk i APPROVED AS TO FORM: w Y i, i BY: DATE: d ,- r _ City Attorney i 1' t t 'ki t7 I' �T •ti.t � t; t a 'v 6♦ r 1 r 0 r 4�Y Dates Tat Front Bys Subjects Backgrounds CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONO a1 STAFF REPORT August 20, 1986 City Council and Clty Manager Bill Holley, Director, Cmm unity Services Department Karen McGuire-Emery, Assistant Park Planner The Improvement of F.emcsa Avenue and Handltcn Street, and the IDlssovemnt of Hcrmea Perk an August 6, 1966, bids were received from four bi6ders for the Improvement of Hsrmoea Avenue, Hamilton Street, and the Improvement of Hermosa Park. The Engineer'o estimate for the combined street and park lnpr'ovements wee $1,417,014.00. Valley Crest Landscape of Van Nuys, was the lowest, responsiblo bidaer, In the amount of $1,322,360.00. A tabulation of the results of the fns bid proposals is atrachad for your reference. Because the project Is being accomplished as a joint effort between the Fhgineertn g Division and the Cam rsity Services Dspsrtwr t, funding for the project will be provided from the following sources. E. n t 6yatems DeVelcpsent Fund Systems Beautification Fund Cararmity Services Dspertn,�eat Parr Devolcr nt and Total Project Cost Recamendationt $628,611.00 $513,811.00 114,800.00 $693,769.00 $693,769.00 b1,32 ,380.00 It is recommended that Council approve the award of the contract and execute the agreement for the Improv, sent of Hermosa Avenue, Hamilton Street and the Improvement of flennoca Park to Valley Crest Land acapi g of Van Nuys, California, the lweat responsible bidder, in the amount of $1,322,380.00, plus a 10b contingency. The total aaount of the contract nct to exceed $1,454,618.00. Attadmentt Bid Summary ArTeanent e 5g t .. = 0 m r O .p tl V p G P 1Yj � •+ O J m V P N P y N q p^ Y �D3o5E°BgPeB Y qNq yy pp qq pp p_p Y Y 1CC1�� I• I• r r I" r r /• I" r I'• I• I• r n V •t n n N O O H S H H S S S H S S S S H H S S H S 1 N �c�Ql r P y rg y1 N V V W N tl V nQ V Y tl� p O O H O aaH N H O H S U q O P O G O S O S w tl g 0? O N U IJ S O S O G N O N Y O O 8 8 8 8 a 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a J N N i mp 4 .ti O N Y Y tl W �p my 80 V N 8 8 88 8 a 8 8 P' 8 pp8 8 8' 8 a oas's's's'ssaseaaa��aa ffi' V Y i 0� r• y� .I N .NII Y N p V O J O N S N N O N y Y O O O D1 O- N m Y 8 8"° 4 8 8 H R 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 H o 8 8 41 M N b m O y V N P P 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ". 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 �99 G n Y E a `S n s D r n R a P m�P n N m O ti T q� y C� 4' w � re I 0 ■ N .. . V u. P N Y .`.:. . $ V S• y w w �. v 1•Y. a� t O q' 7 a' o' u •� N . ^ fi p � � � tl O rI".•1 r JO G� U# N N H G N L .+ r W H O H M I � r N V• Y r C• N r n n r r r L.1 N -1 y. ��♦♦ R � N H O S H O IN1. P O S O O O H H O rl a' 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 F3 8 8 8 8 8 V .p V 1py pN y jF.j qssp 0 S VV NN m O y O O W Y O. N C O N W IY VV e as'sa'yso's�'s'sos's1s����ssasf ]! s' 's' ' 8's�aHsaasss•sa's S qNq qqp gg# N ggN .pPp gVg.. QY np. # .. # i N aoR$�253oE�Xa��aTooi8;gS s aHaH�aya'sa'Ns..HppSasHHHasHHH ' ... q , Y I O� ♦O N y N V. N N 4 .+ P �± a' a' ffiH'sa'sssosa�z90 a m Y N .{.���♦�11 # m#m N r mm 6xx N Y # .NN+ # N rqq �� O r S O O w O V N S a "a ' o'sas'ssso sows � 1y w H ♦ N N r ... # r N .. V# N S 8888R8888E8E8888�88�8 r .. rr (0 D v }y� 4 p _��� 'r •f'y��'r�9�tr1 �� '�••; �ti1r� i >' rp S 'tii +< ,�' .. s fx _ei':r�i -,:� =7 YNNO. . . . N. . . . OOOVNY1YNrf f Ym+ppx: G• y P P i i Y O ff y �I.f' `X p Mr •� Y M r 9 9 + i 9 ,� P s •• XF [�1 n n ' e � .. a � 8 3Yi ✓ .• u r 4T N o vl 0 8 w o S r3 � )� � ' Pr Nrr L.In P{. r � r �nrw r�nN rIN x yy O' O' N V N P)� Y .p •m• Y p r " � y 1 1 ' S 88� 8 SSS8�o886t8 ,. F SO O N N. N. N O. O G m. O N O Y1 8 8 8 8 F 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ii it 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 • O I• L N p V OY `\ a1 � r N N A � .ppp r .Ru .+ p qM jVl p yN yr �pf yyp pp gyyp • GS P r'Y' P 3 P N Li O aoo'$itoazaa „s�'sa�g's's €'sap's r� 8 888 8 88'ss8asH518 r r'�1Tw ��� $SolPrlo,38o8N8o�88$�.k7'�Ire ryry q ., 808 8 8 8 8 a 3 e's85tyE a W ly W N Y N •+ V N Y p O V N O at Po�R'�tSo o8y18�o,�'R8 a3 zi 8$$$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 3 0 8 8 1 v }y� 4 p _��� 'r •f'y��'r�9�tr1 �� '�••; �ti1r� i >' rp S 'tii +< ,�' .. s fx _ei':r�i -,:� =7 r ati r }•N4•^ y ��..♦♦ y V i J W N 1� V N n C1 C 6` V P N� �• Y br•= � �+',� r ` O A �rp9 w. �♦ P P y N P P O} T• P W •� N tr•�2 y_ ji T ♦• i+ Z� A A� 4 9 w• GG n � V w��l N Iw o A P: s rep ° •nom ' i♦i V ` = _ ^ � w .. . w AP w V Y M H 6 0� N o o N o 0 5 6 6 0 P m .Wi• .Nr o o r� i 1 ,% n ; b } N r8a r P M N N N ._ CO rNp !rQ e S O utl♦ N nY V P 40 � 0 0 tl♦ S O N N Y m P V � r I♦ y O N N V N P N �+ r♦ O G P N P P O m N ' pN 1 p r O W 0 0 0 r w y ♦� S N N O� r > } r V N } N r m} N, N N V �• m w v N � N� b 6 m O m � 0 0 Y♦ �^ P .Vi O} ♦E 0 0 O ♦�` 8 8 S 8 8 8 S 8 b 8 a s s a a G 9IL. �Y QP } QQ♦♦ P A SmS ggT gg� 4r4 Ng 4NQ P P S o o $ o o? o S S S 6 o S 3 o s o� `'sss'ssHassa'ss'ao'ssa�•se's ♦mw •`S �' .mp t5 N r M} M VJ r O P A P^ N♦ O 1 � ♦y m♦ N m S N a a M Q♦♦♦ P H S S O O O a I`, t t,♦ N Y r} I+ V N� P P Y r I> N > 1 gg g5� V Y V N $E8 n'POi' ova ou•• °o °08�6o�NO3.reN •>♦ + ;• �.:' a'ssNsa�ss�s'ssas'ss•sa's� j 0 4 I(!!!!_ � � ` ■`l��� �`�� ®` E qt: ! - - -�! Iw E■!!/ �. , k ■eke§kekkaak.kk.■kk � , t { a' § k ;, §k■ � � 5 wkkke5■ V - , ))ko13 kk , § ka,:, ■a k :.■ „ e.,we ' ' 'a' ," ■ §kk ■§ ƒ ' » % k %$$)k§ &) % ■ §) & # # @� - B � we,.,§e w- e §,e■kkk■ �/2 •z �� -` � - �� � ��\�,�� ` % zw< # r .¥, ;� « ¥ � ■ • -, .{ .f w= '%� ZW} . ° %/ _ ` \f� � '� ;\ � . \� � $ l�. a'. AGRF.EMEIFT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the following agreement is made and entered into, in triplicate, as of the date executed by the City Clerk and the Mayor, by and between VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE, INC, hereinafter referred to as the 'CONi an t e ty o ant o Cucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as 'CITY'. WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed .ids or Proposals, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date specified in said notice; and WHEREAS, City did accept the bid of Contractor S 1,322,380.00 and < WHEREAS, City has authorized the City Clerk and Mayor to enter into a written contract with Contractor for furnishing labor, equipment, and "terial for the construction of The Improvement of Hermosa Ave. and Hamilton St, and Improvement of Hermosa Park. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furv,ish all necessary labor, tools, materials. appliances, and equipment for and do the work for the PROJECT TITLE Said work to be performed in accordance with specifications and standards on file in the office of the City Engineer and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the instruction of the City Engineer. 2 INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The aforesaid spec ifica'ions are incorporated herein y re erence thereto and made a part hereof with like force and effect as If all of said documents were set forth in full herein Said documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together with this written agreement, rhail constitute the contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complet4 and finished Piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the Contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT: A. The undersigned bidder agrees to execute the contract within ten '. (10) working days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after the 10 working days, and to complete his portion of the i work within Sixty (60) working days from the date specified in the Notice to #ti,4gY,- F -1 :r 6V 'Al Proceed and maintain the park for 60 days after acceptance of construction improvements. The bidder agrees further to thn assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of Two Hundred ($200.00) dollars for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages. 4. INSURANCE +he Contractor still not commence work under this contract until he-Was —obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work cn his subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The Contractor shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the following policies of •'` insurance: a. Compensation Insuracne: Before beginning work, the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a certificate of Insurance as proof that he has taken out full compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws o• the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contactor, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the ity a certification as follows: 'I am aware of the pro -isions of Sectton 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.' b. For all operation of the Contractor or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: (1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accideat. (2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each accident; $500,000'aggregate.' (3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000.000 each accident. (4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each accident: $500.000 aggregate. F -2 (5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 Bach accident. (6) Autumobile - Property Damage ' $250,000 each accident. c Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. ^,hall: (1) Be issued by an insurance company approved In writing by City, which is qualified to do business in the State of California; (2) Name as additional Insured the City of Rancho Cucauonga, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be so included; v (3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance " held or owned by the designated additional insureds shall be t called upon to cover a loss under said policy; i (4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: 'It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not bey cancelled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter.• (5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: , (1) Waives all right'of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in pare: -aph b by reason of any claim arising out of or connected pith the operations of Contractor or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein; (2) Provides it shall not be cancelled or altered without thirty r (30) days' written notice thereof given to City by registered; mail. e. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the contract i' present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or present a certificate of the insurance li company, showing tl,1 issuance of such insurance, and the additional 7 insureds and other p.ovisions required herein. F -3 4 b 5 PREYA L N MADE• Notice is hereby given that in accordance with .r ArticleslI and 2. the CCoontractor °isCrequireditoo pay.notrless thantthelggeneral prevailing rate of per diem wages tar work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per them wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 93< -0 Base Line, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any irterested party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to City, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herelnbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by aim or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance witn the provisions of Section 177 5 o t e Lator Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed In the prosecution of the work. Attentior is directed to the provisions in Section 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor ender him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship tapprenticeship program inethatl works of approval The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: a. when unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an averageof 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or b. When the number of apprentices In training in the area exceeas a ratio of one to five, or c When the trade can show that it 1s replacing at least 1/30 of Its menbership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or F -4 • 4 , r) 'tom. 67 d. Uhan the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any appranticeaule trade on such contracts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work or a wor en employee in the execution of this contract, a,p, the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shal comply w'.th and he governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twnety -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanir employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under hio, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. 8 TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: Contractor agrees to pay travel and subs Isrence pay eacl wr n nee ed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement; filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773 8 9 CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City 0 Rancho Cucamonga and its elected of c a s, officers. agents and employees shall not be answerable or accountable In any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen, employees of the Contractor or his subcontractors or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work. The Contractor shall be responsible for and damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstruct ors or from any cause whatsoever, except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employes servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City during the prog -ess of the work or at any tim3 before its completion and final acceptance. F -5 W The Contractor will indemnify City and its elected officials, officer, agents and employees against and will hold and save them harmless from any and i all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firn, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor, his agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there Is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City. Its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, but excluding such actions. claims, danages to persons or property, penalities, obligations, or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willfu, misconduct of City, _ its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly t responsible to City, and in connection therewith: a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed to connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations, or liabilities and will pay all costs and � expenses, including attorney's fees Incurred in conenction therewith. b. The Contractor will promptly pay any ,judgment rendered dgalnst the Contractor of City, or its elected officials, officers, agents or employees, covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations and liabilities arising out of or In connection w"1- such work, operations, or activities -of the Contractor hereunder, and the Contractor agrees to save and hold the same harmless therefrom. c. In the event City, without fault, is made a party to any action or proceeding °filed or prosecuted against the Contractor for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contactor hereunder, the Contrector agrees to pay to City any and all costs and expenses incurred by City to such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees. So much of the money due to the Contractor under and by virtue of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damage as aforesaid. 10. NON - DISCRIMINATION: No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of the race, color, or religi ^n of such persons, and every contractor for public works violating this section Is subject to all the penalties Imposed for a violation of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code in .ccordance with the provisions of Section 1735 of said Code. 11. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the Cont -actor for furnishing t e mater a an o ng t e prescribed work the unit prices set forth in accordance with Contractor's Proposal dated July 23, 1986. F -6 ? .2. 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES: In the event that any action or proceeding is brought by e t er party -enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, < the prevailing party shrll recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred with respect thereto. ' IN WITNESS WNERIDF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly exeucted with all the formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California ' Contractor's License No._ t Date BY: Title Date Contractor's Business Phone Emergency Phone at which Contractor can be reached at any time F -7 t7e- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA. CA BY: BY: ty Cler i� e =I v 1� r I , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 20, 1986 10: City Council and City Hanger FYtm: Bill Holley, Director, CMVWdty ScrviCeS Depaltarc'nt By` Dave Leamsrd, Padc Project Cootdim:nr Subject: Professional services for Hermosa and Hamilton Street improvenennts and Hex=a Park. Per City Council auL`soriraticn on July 2, 1966, request for lxrcpm%ls w(Ze received to furnish pro£eadio al inspection services, materials teatin3 and survey for the improvement of Hermosa and Hamilton Streets and Hermosa .,ark. Evaluation of ths four prcposals received, reveal C.I.A. Enginoering and Willdan Associates offering a carplete padusgo. the estimated cost to provide the aervices will be $35,175.00 by C.I.A. sneering or $42,108.00 by Hilldan Associates. Both firms have provided serviced to the City L', c„e past and beta are judged capably to provide the erpertiso needed for Oust project. Rcmmcrlation: It is recommended that cour:rl erecuto eereement to provide profesaicaal services for Hermosa and Hamilton Street and Hermosa Part. with C.I.A. Engineering, 9507 Arrow Highwmy, Rand:o Cucamonga, 91730. For the can of $35,175.00 with a 101 contingency. 'r .p h z4, F PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement Is made and entered Into this 21 day ' of August 1906. between the City. of Rancho Cucamonga, a Nunicipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as •CITY °) and C I A Engineering Consultants (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT'). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal ' pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of enatrart administration /observation, construction survey and material testing for improvement of Hermosa and Hamlltion Streets and Hermosa Park. ("Project" hereafter). (ti) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perfuri professional r services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff to the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Project: The preparation of complete inspection service of a assistant resident engineers. materials testing and construction survey. described in Exhibit °A• Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plan, maps, surveys, reports _I 7c)- f1 and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project ds outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services at are necessary to be perfumed by CONSULTANT to order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, map•i, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit 08" Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT aarc-es as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduind, Exhibit "B" Cupies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A ". CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regard'•ig said documents and CONSULTANT shall, thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth purs•rant to this Section 32.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and him such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the ,y event any such other persons ate retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby t, warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services i 7-3 .. I R required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows_: i 7-3 .. I R (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $36,687.00 for the performance of the services required hereunder This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, ,shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "C ". (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a mantnl, basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said ; nvoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C" either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will .,Id invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals descr id in Exhibits "A" and "C ". (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no evert, shall CITY be required to pay tc CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximima payable hereunder prior to •eceipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content tr CITY Final paymene.shall be i -ade not later than 60 days after presentat.on of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional service' requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of ,Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis to accordance with the fee schedule set forth 'in Exhibit "C ". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly hasis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time ".ter said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (al Information and assistance as set forth in tAMM "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. ° (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information tram other governmental agencies and /or private parties. Horever, it shall be -3- CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initirl contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, naps, models, photographs and •reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall he considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CIT1 by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain sucn copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision on the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized are,. ; without the specific written colsent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the so,a risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmle.i and indemnity the CONSULTANT against all drmages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse gt arwther site by the CITY , its steif or authorized agents. 4 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination• to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) day% prior to the date of termination specified in sdid Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicaole hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit •B', on a pro - rata bass, with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, Irepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. COY ^1LTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. e 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and ail notices, demands, invoices and written cmmvnlcations between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the panes under this Agreement: Notch Bedrosian, -4-` 71 C I.A. Engineering Consultants, 9567 Arrow Highway, Suite J. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Any such notices, oemands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: ZORSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it ha3 obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance. (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons wham it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement*. (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to De kept, in full force and tffect, for the cutual baneflt of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liab'litiet for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTPUT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Oollars($1,000,C00.00) for bodily -5- -7r ;, injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least On.. Million Oollars(I,000,000.00) for property damage. - (c) Errors and omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of Insurance concerning errors and omissions ('malpractice ") providing protection of at least $250,000 00 for errors and omissions ( "malpractice") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT perfoiming engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY (d) General Insurance Irequirements: All insurance required by expresf. provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional Insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing, with any Insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be 'tancelled or materially changed except after tl.irty (30) days' notice by the Insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 4. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law.,, 10. Assignment) No assigreent of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunde- shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that i CONSULTANT and Its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors -6- 7 under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be* governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agretment, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorieys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, betwe_n the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the, parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jeffery King, Mayor ATTEST: Date: Date: Beverly A. Au the et, ty er Approved as to form: City Attorney -7- 7£" 4 S ii M. i • EXHIBIT A rite K Rancho Cucanonoa ' Memdaa/Ramilton Streets Hermosa Park Scope of Services for Contract kdninistration and Construction Omervation Provide a full -time construction impactor to act u the Assistant Resident Iaginaer (City of Rancho Cs.aamomgass Project Manager will be the Resident Engineer) for both projects. The duties a' the Assistant Resident Engimer will include the followings 1. Perform donatructlon inspection of all improvements except the improvememA listed below to ausure that the work is in conformance with the contract documents. Improvements not included for inspection under this contract tie as follwas r. Sewer improvements At both Parks (ms -site severe to be Inspects* by City building Laparmsnt personnel and off -site sewers in street work to be Impacted by Cucamonga county Rater District). b. Buildings (to be impacted by City Pailding Ueparmont). 2. Provide day -to -day coordination and liaison with the Contractor(*), City Resident Engineer, utility companies, project surveyor, materials tasting laboratories, and other i_ndiviauals and agencies involved in the project. 3. Provide coat -act administration swrvlcss in accordance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Manual, including the followings a. Prepare daily inspection reports. b. - Prepare weekly statement of working days. C. Prepare contract change orders. c. Prepare daily reports to document all extra work performed on a time and material basis. e. Review and certify quantities of work complete for progress payments. f. "view and maintain tiles of Contractor'* wage and employment records. g. Maintain other records and prepare other reports as required by the Coltrane Local Assistance Manual. !. Perform final impaction@ and make recommendations for acceptance to the City. S. Maintain records to reflect the as- comtruct#d condition. 6. prepare or assist City in preparing all nscesuarl final reports, noticed of completion, etc. s ' 79 i a EXHIBIT A cont. City of Pa cho Cucamonga Mozzma /Hamilton Straots Hamosa Park Scope of Services Construction Survey Street and Park 3mprovezents 1. Set teaparary on -site reference benchmarks for grade control during construction. (approx. throe (3)). 2. Provide cvpiss of all curvey reports and provide certifier, building pad ropatt. 1 Park Improvements 3. Place two (2) oats of grade stakes on 100 foot grin as required one (1) I set for rough grading and horizontal control and one (1) sac for tiniah grade and horizontal control. 4. Place top of curb stakes at 25 toot intervals for parking lot and play area. (approx. Mu linear feet) 5. Place one (1) eat of stakes for line control for saver and grain pipe and grade control for locations of claenouts, catch bat-no and 3uneticns. (approz. 1200 linear feet of pipe am 13 structure). 6. Place one (1) got of stakes at 25 foot intervals for top at tooting and well. (approx. 180 linosS feat). Street Xaprovementa r .. Place one (1) sat of ■tnkes at 25 foot intervals for line am grace control for top of curb and cross gutter. (approx. 4220 linear foot curb and 145 linear feet cross gutter). S. Place one (1) set of stakes at 25 toot intervals fur top of footing and well (8f'Prox. 2560 linear feat). 9. Plane one (1) sat of stakes at 50 foot intervals for line am grace control for finish aurfnce of pavement at centerline ( approx. 1275 lines: feet). 1 s EXHIBIT A cont Cih' of Rancho Cucamonga Hamraaa/Haailton Street Harmcsa Park Scope of servioan for ILLtarleL Testing 1. Perlom sail compaction testing as foAlown A. Subgrade of street works including approximately ens (1) teat par 300 linear feet (approximately S tests). b. Subgrade for building pad*, and concrete slabs fur picnic areas and bluchers (approximately 10 teats). C. Subgrade for parking lot (approximately 3 tests). 2. Pertorn laboratory maximum dens %.y tests for representative ■oil mampl*s. ApproximatelY four (a) testa are ant.�prted. 3. Perform compaction testa for aggregate base in street work. Approximately two (2) tests are anticipated. {. Pertorm compaction testa for park grading in sufficient quantity to provide compaction certification report per applicable -mama. (approx. 30 tmsti adjust quantities if needed). • S. Pertorn extraction, gradation and donsit/ testa for asphalt concr.v. 1 pay.ment. Apprvripately $hrea (3) of each teat is anticipated. • 6. Provide written reports to the City of RmUO Nc ®mugs that document the• rer.ults of all testing and provide building pad certification report. l J ■ EXHIBIT B Completion of Project: The date of completion of all phases of the project shall be coluensurati with the filling of the Notice of Completion for the construction project M � 1 �•.iI y � env lt. .1 •iYi EXHIBIT C CONTRACT PROPOSAL 813UIDSAfmAmMmi STRQ'T AID mmm" PARK TO THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CIW Or RANCHO CUCAlCDCA, CALIIORNIAl The underalgagd bidder declares that be has' carefully eaanimd the location of the proposed work, that he has e.,anlond i%s plana, special rrovisions ano specifications, and read the arciopanying Soatruotion to bidders, and hereby proposes and *grace, it this proposal is accepted, to turnish all naterial and do all the work renuirad to complete the said work in accordance with the plans, Special Provisions and Specifics% Song, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost and hourl; sus counts not forth in the e. .iedule on tha following Proposal. All testa shall be as doaignated in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction - Current Edit: n, incluatng supplements. PROPDSAL ITEMS A. Contract Administration /Oboarvation ( Appendix A) r/ -480 Hrs. rstiaatwl Required (SEE PAGE 9) $ 70.740.00 B. Contract Construction Survey (Appendix B) Provide Appendix B I',00, 1 $_320,00 ' Provide Appendix B Itea 2 $ -170.O(1 Provide Appendix 8 Item 3 $1+829 oa Provide Appendix B Item 4 'Provide Appendix B Item 5 „i Provide Appendix a _ton B S1Q_ !If Provide Appendix B Itae 7 $3•BSO.a�_ Provide Appendix 8 Item U $2,245,00 Providx Appendix 8 Itm 9 S H4p_00 Total Estimated Survey Costs C. Contract Material Testing unit Cost Total 50 Ea. Cmpactlon Teat $__41.0() _ ,C.950.00 t a-Pa. Haxinlm Density Test S fXL_00 $ -10• I Ea. Extraction Craaing and Density $ 1Q0.00 2 EA. Certification Reports $ 150,00 $--MM -cta1 EstiaatedOMAtaTial Teat Costa Total Patlaated Contract Proposal Costa 9 35.175.00 (Total of two A,B cad C above) ri EXHIBIT C cont. Assistant Resident Engineer - $60 hours g $38/hr .... $10,240.00 Office Engineer - 60 hours 0 $ 3 9 /hr ..................$2,100.00 Clerical - 12 hours E $25 /hr ... ........................$300.00 5 Total Estimated Cost ............................ ...$20,740.00 U V 7 K �r e 9 ■ -Y� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT LATE: August 20, 1986 To: City Council and City Manager :•. OM: Robert Rizeo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwocd, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Service Aareemertt with McAllister the amount oP 96.500.00 for Management Coneul.A_ ng Services for 7nLRKM111aR Syatem Traintna and glarnlna. The attached subject agreement between the City and 0. Eric McAllister for information management services for planning and monitoring of Rancho Cucamonga's information system Is provided for Council's consideration. The service agreement provides for a maximum of 96,600 00 for on call management services for fiscal year 1986/87 It is recommended that City Council approve the attached agreement for information management se•vlces. Respectfully Submitted, IRA. loxrwt Gam• Cl ' Ass ieten ty Manager RAR JBF:kmm .c 1 n q Z�Ft August 13, 1986 City of Rancho Iucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 51730 ATTN: Mr. Jerry B Bulwood SUBJECT: Proposal for Management Conoultina Services for , IInformation System Planning and Project Control. i Dear Jerry: Pursuant to our conversation regarding the above mentioned v subject, please find this letter to be a proposal by the undersigned to provide management information services toward the planning and monitoring of Rancho Cucamonga's Information systems, This management coneulting proposal includes the cooperative development of computer and information systems policies for both hardware and software. Thlo proposal included assistance for you in developing short -range and long -range plane and schedules for such s computer systems and the communications among computer users and with the County of San Bernardino. Also included Is assistance for you in the layout of the computer locations r; proposed for the new Civic Center ' Information System Planning includes setting up training for microcomputer users (ouch as IBM -AT) and planning the ;. y, required documentation and policies for computer W ✓ utilization. L OW My fee for the abo „e statement of work .s 975 00 per hour plus any out -of- pocket expenses incurred as a result of this work but excluding the drive between my office and the City of Rancho Cucamonga The accumulation of these fees will not exceed 641)0 00 within fiscal year 1986/87. A one -page summary of computer and information status will be mailed to you after each Fri ,'ay's esaslon together with cy hours for that week. Sincerely, Eric MCAllieter 4504 David Way San Bernardino, CA 92404 -1418 EM:kmm Jeffrey Ring, Mayor Passed, Approved, and Adopted this 20th day of August, 1906- Attest: Beverly A Authelet, City Clerk Executed this 21st day of August, 1986 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. : , ,1 s v 8 ,” "Ai �T+�'i'�l 4 key,. � y,. ir: � � ) w '- � +s� u 1, v' 1 , ■: M1 I� t. } DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C, -CA STAFF REPORT �f August 20, 1906 a � City Counci' and City Manager 1977 Lloyd B. Hubbs, C'ty Engineer Dave Olevins, Maintelance Superintendent Approval to Award Annual Stieet Sweeping Contract to Haaker Equipment Company of Pouona. Total expenditure not to exceed $30,070.00. Per previous Council action, seated bid proposals for the subject contract were solicited, received and opened in the office of the City Clerk on August 12, 1986. The low bid proposal was submitted by Haaker Equipment Company of Pomona for the amount of $1,869.46 monthly. A Bid Summary detailing all bid proposals received is attached for Council reference. RFCOMNEMDATION It is recommended that the City Council Award .ne Annual Strzet Swenpia; Contract to Haaker Equipment Company of Pomona. Total expenditure not to exceed $'0,000.00 thru fiscal year to be funded by Gas Tax, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to e;ecute said contract on behalf of City. Respectfully submitted, LBH:DB:d Attachments s• h r r nF ;'.n |!�| ez. |■ |ff §§ \ ■! ■n�� & f| ` | §` _ ■; K �\ | ` | /a 4' E CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT LITE August 20, 1986 C —� 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 0. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Dlevins, Maintenance Superintendant SUBJECT: Approval to award the City Wide Emergency and ,Routine Equipment Pavement Repair, Shoulder Grading, and Debris Removal Annual Maintenance Contract to Laird Construction of Rancho Cucamonga Pursuant to previous Council action, sealed bid proposals for the subject contract were solicited, received and opened in the office ofthe City Clerk on Aucust 12, 1986 The low bid proposal was submiLted by Laird Construction of Raacho Cucamonga for the amount of $3,091.31. A bid :jTaary detailing all bid proposals received is attached For Council reference. It is important to note tnat the natur: o' the work performed under this agreement is for emergency as well as routine services and as such bid totals are based upon estimated quantitle: for the purpose of bid romcarison only. Therefore, the contract uni: prices are firm however the final contract expenditure will exceed the standard 10% contingency. RECOMMEIIDATIOM It is recowc:ided that the City Council award the City Wide Emergency and I ; Routine Equipment Pavement Repair Shoulder Grading and Debris Removal Annual Maintenance Contract to Laird Construction of Rancho Cucamonga, >; for a total expenditure not to exceed $00,000.00. R spec fully sudoitt d/ i w� LBB:DB:dlw " ?? Attachments 9L' •, r i.. 1, ` S- rte= 1 'w r 'L• i it n i� n Ski > a= r ii 1 L Z 9 E O _ :R "• a R s v $a a s $s s oss slZ :k n a � " r !• o v � S 0 2 9 v a � • d `r v � r NqN t i,. ' 411f fiery; lT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAATONGA STAFF REPORT a 0 DATE: August 20, 1986 T3: City Council and City Manager tr FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendant SUBJECT, Approval of Extension of City Wide Emergency and Routine Equipment Pavement Repair, Shoulder Grading, and Debris Removal Annual Maintenance Contract with Laird Construction. The City's previous contract with Laird Construction expired as of June 30, 1986. The new Renewal Contract is on this Council Agenda for award to Laird Construction of Rancho Cucamonga for fiscal year 86 -87. Huwever, staff anticipates that the new contract , if awarded, will not be executed by the contractor and available for execution by the Mayor and City Clerk until the Council meeting of September 3, 1986. In the interim, several small protects and score critical functions normally performed under the agreement have been postponed. However, a continued delay to completing some functions normally performed under the agreement could expose the City to additional liability. For this reason Staff has recommended a Council resolution exte..ding the prior agreement with Laird Construction retroactive from July 1, 1986 thru September 3, 1986. REC014W31DATION It is recommended that the City Council extend t —ty Wide Emergency and Routine Equipment Pavement Repair, Shoulde grading and Debris Remov3I Annual Maintenance Contract with Laird Construction retroactive from July 1, 1986 thru September 3, 1986. Respectfully submitted, LBH:C lw Attachments n. r �1 d i i• F {i DATE: f0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CP1'Y OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT August 20, 1986 City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician rib 1977 Approval of Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for Tract 9649 located at the southwest corner of HermosF and Nilson Avenues, submitted by The Pennhlli Company Tentative Tract 9649 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 12, 1982, for the subdivision of a 22.4 acre parcel into 39 lots In the Very Low Development District located at the southwest corner of Hermosa end Wilson Avenues. The Developer, The Pennhill Company, has submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction o• the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faith. ,1 Performance Bond: 5510,000.00 Labor and Katerial Bond: $255,000.00 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.dR.s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution e roving Tract 9649, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Respectfully submitted 9� LBH:LB:ke Attachments 93 .; "J 1� Y 'r r s� TRACT NO 9649 v MA w ^A w PA p 3 � y •0 0 � YAi S r � L s 9u •`�w ... p �, I S p qn i •© p pQ• .Q s wA• .F p A• •A p p � A A 1 710-1 p O- w CITY OF PROJECT: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION q� EXHIBIT;_ tlr V�V { RESOLUTION NO. Wo — D4I x A RESOLUTION OF THE uITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVMNT AGREEMENT, IFWROVEHENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9649 WHEREAS, the Tentative W.p of Tract No. 9649, consisting of 39 lots, submitted by The Pennhill Cempany, Subdivider, located on the southwest corner of Hermosa and Nilson Avenues has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Nap Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the iequfrements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. HOW, THEPEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and t$e same is approved and tie Mayor is authorized to execute sax on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That sai leprovement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Nap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAIF• August 20, 1986 19n TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 7902,' located on the eas side of Mayberry, south of Nilson, submitted by Arlo N. Blair; any releasing the deposit for Setting Final Monuments, and the Improvement 'Agreement and Improvement Security submitted by John and Rina Ling Arlo N. Blair has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Security submitt d 7902 by John and RenaeLiImprovement , proveG by ty Council�onvApril 16, 1986, in the amount of: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit $49,000.00 Labor and Material Letter of Credit 24,500.00 Mr. Blair has also paid a cash deposit for Setting of Final Monuments In the amount of $1,400.00 to replace the cash deposit received from John Ling on March 28, 1986, Receipt No. 33809. RECOIMEHDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution releasing the agreement and security submitted by John and Rina Ling, accepting the agreement and security submitted by Arlo N. Blair and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. It is also recommended that the cash deposit for Setting of Final Monuments be released. Respec ull s Mmitted, / LBH:LB:ko Attachments 94 w i �:1, CEL MAP No CITY OF PROJEC RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: _ ENGINEERING DIVISION 97 EXHIBIT; ej �.e•f \rr •. i s_ N i� RESOLUTION NO. L/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ZOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRCFtMNT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 7902 Aril RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ARD IMPROVEMENT SECURITY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 16, 1986 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on August S. 1986, by Arlo W. Blair as developer, for the Improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and general'y located on the east side of Mayberry, south of Wilson; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in, said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Parcel Map 7902; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Se,:u•ity, which is identified In said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that sold Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security are hereby approved and the same replaces the Improvement Agreemert and Improvement Security submitted by John and Rena Ling, approved by City Council on April 16, 1986, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement or behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto, and to release the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security submitted by John and Rena Ling. �w t; r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAlONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 20, 1986 81 `r5 To: City Council and City Manager V From: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer By: Duane A. Baker, Administrative Aide SUBJECT: Request for Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Fleet Maintenance Consultants for a Corporation Yard Master Plan. Total expenditure not to exceed $13,210.00 to be funded by Gas Tax Having received and reviewed proposals for developing a Corporation Yard Master Plan, staff is prepared to reconmend entering into a Professional Services Agreement for development of a Master Plan. The agreement will be of standard language and format as approved by the City Attorney. Of the proposals received, the proposal from Fleet Maintenance Consultants 1s best suited to the City's needs. Fleet Maintenance Co:sultants are familiar with the City's needs and requiements due to their work on t`.e original Corporrtion Yard Needs Asessment Study which they prepared for the City. Fleet Maintenance Consultants proposed cost for the project is $13,210.00. This cost represents the lowest cost proposal received by the City. Within sixty (60) days of entering into this Agreement, the City would receive a Master Plan consisting of conceptual site plans for floor plans, construction phasing plans, probable construction and specific design costs. RECONENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council aoprove the City to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Fleet Maintenance Consultants for the development of a Master Plan for the Corporation Yard at 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga. The cost of the project will not exceed Thirteen Thousand Two Hundred Ten Dollars ($13,210.00) with completion of the protect to be within sixty (50) days of Agreement date. Re Dec u ly submitte , w DAB:pamV Attachments • va Ia C C PROFEiS1ONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 19 . between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as *CITY") and Fleet Maintenance Consultants. Inc. (hereinafter referred to as ' CONSULTANT'). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation Master Plan for the City Operations snd Maintenance Facility at 9153 Nineth Street ('Project' hereafter). (ii) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the perforrance of such Cervices. (111) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance tt CITY, CITY's Planning Commissiun, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. ('v) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perfurm such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, It is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The follow,ng definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Project: The preparation of Master Plan. Statement of _Probehle Construction Costs, and Scope of Work and Fee Proposal for Detailed Design described in Exhibit 'A' Scope of Services hereto Including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports �A C C and documents to CITY a equired and attendance at any aid all work ses s, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the protect as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the protect. (c) Completion of Protect: The date of completion of all phases of the protect, Including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the protect acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit "0' Protect Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT stall forthwith undertake and complete the protect in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents`) including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit 'A" to CITY within the time specified in Protect Scheduled, Exhibit 004. Copies of the documents shall b, in such numbers as are required by Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents In such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform rervices r, required hereunder. CONSULTANT further xorees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the or written approval of CITY. F. 3. CITY agrees as follows: »_ i7 (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of 513.210.00 for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fee•, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors ti CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "C ". (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be merle by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C" either with aspect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual : -•ks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 955 of individual last totals described in Exhibits 'A' and "C'. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY )e requi -ed to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereudder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technic,I documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentatior of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in th_ 'Scope of Services set forth In Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C'. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY aareet to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit W hereto (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, If available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available from CI'Y , files applicable to the project. , (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information` from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. Horever, it shall be ? c C CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Gwnership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, model s, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considerei the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by rN: ;.,,TANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CO3SULTNIT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTAA shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. Th3 CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, elefms and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at COASULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit 'D', on a pro - rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, horevrr, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, survey:, drawings, maps, models, photngraphs and rep -rts, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT -s of date of termination. CONSULTANT may lot terminate this Agreement ex -it for cause. s 7. notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all ratites, demands, Invoices and written communications between the parties i nireto shall be addressed as set forth In this paragraph 7. The below named imlividuals, furthermore, shall be those persons prlrarily responsible for the performance by the patles under this Agreement: Richard Brake, Senior r /03 G: Associate, Fleet Maintenance Consultants. Inc., P.O. Box 820008. Houston, 7eras 77282 -0008 Any su6h notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof In the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. C^'ISULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning York. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full v.orkers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of Californid. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions , of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement*. (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. COHSULTAIIT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public f liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal •z injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT'S activities, 4� providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($5000,000.00) for bodily 1, C injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($500,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ("malpractice") providing protection of at least 100.00 for errors and omissions ('malpractice°) with respect to loss ar!sing from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, Its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY', elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be car; ied by CITY; and (3) they cannot be carcelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' autice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to tha maximum extent permitted by law. 30. Assignment): No assignment of this Agreement or of any pirt or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or i in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. + 4 11. Independent Contractor: The parties herctn agree that ' ,s CONSULTANT and its employers, officers anel agents are independent contractors :x M1 =1 0 Y r. C under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance Witt,, th laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount detemined by the Court to be reasonable 14. Entire .Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representatior by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hercto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jon 0. H ke s, Mayor ATTEST Beery A Authelet. City Cl erk Date: Date: r' t' Approved as to form: ° ty Attorney • a' q. Al 1,71 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SCOPE OF WORE, (6113186) FLEET MAINTENANCE CONSULTANTS, INC. Task As Master Plan Objectives To develop a Master Plan of the proposed site and fcciiltes which meets the needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. y Work Elemntss o Review space requirements previously developed with the City staff. a s o Review site and facility Information (surveys and os -built drawings) provided by the City. t o Review codes, lows and ordinances applicable to facility rehabilitation and /or new construction. o Develop alternative conceptual site plans and preliminary floor plops and review with the City staff. Them plans will specifically addressf - On -site circulation patters for vehicles, equipment, materials and personnel which will provide the most efficient, cost -effective, and safest maintenance operation. - Ingre- arid egress routes which maximize safety and security and minimize vehicular and pedestrian conflict on and off tho site. - Site wcurity requirements. - Supervision and safety. - Phasing alternatives. o Meet with the City staff and review the Master Plan drawings and the cost estimate developed In Task 8 to determine if the project I- to be phese constructed. o Document constr�ctlon phasing decisions. i Deliverables: o Coneoptual site plans and floor plan: o Construction phasing plan rstimatecl Travel: Tnreo 2 day trips. f„ I ■ / i 1, 1 := r Mt Task ©: Cost Estimates Objective•. Identify probable project construction costs. Work Elrments: o Develop Conceptual level statement of probable construction cost for major elements of the project. Major areas Include: - Sltework (grading, utilities, paving, fencing) - Facility renovation - Facility expansion ` - Fuel Island and underground tanlr farm These estimates will be based on squore footage costs and unit costs for major Items. Deliverables o Statement of probable construction cost. Estimated Travel: None. ■ i �{ 4 } t: 1111111 : !,' Ya s' Task C: Scope and Fees for Detailed Design Objective•. To develop the scope of work and fee proposal for detailed design. Work Elements: • Identify subcontractors (architect and engineers) to develop construction documents for Implementing the Master Plan. • Review subcontractor list with the City for approval. • Develop detailed scope of work and fee proposal far the development of detailed construction drawings and specifications. Deltveroblex a Detailed Scope of Work and Fee Proposal. Estimated Travel: None. .4 i all 181T ••B" u—UgMr" (o C ,I June 13, 1986 t Mr. Lloyd B. HubFs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 C Baseline Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: City Operations and Maintenance Facility n Master Plan Services Dear Lloyd: 0 Fleet Maintenance Consultants, Inc. Is pleased to submit the enclosed Scope of Work and Fee Proposal to develop the Master Plan for the new City Operations and Maintenance Facility at 9153 Ninth Street. The Master Plan will address the renovation and expansion capabilities of the existing structure which is approximately 11,250 square feet. The plan will be based an the space requirements previously developed and submitted on April 30, 1986. FMC did a quick review of the site and foctllties on June 10, 1986 which indicates that both are well suited for ''he Intended use. :'he City should verify which equipment Items (air compressors, vacuum system) ore Included In the purchase price. The City must 0150 provide: 1) A legal description and certified land survey of the site, giving, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoining property rights-of-way, restrictions, easements, encroachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site. 2) Locations, dimensions, and complete data ("as- built" drawings) pertaining to existing •;� }..� buildings and other improvements. 3) Full Information rega ding available service and utility lines both public and private, • qtr';. - abuve and below grade, inaWing Inverts and d -pths. „ t ' The enclosed Scope of Work can be completed within sixty days from written notice to proceed. If you have any questions, please do not hes,la^.a to call. Sincerely, nc _ Richard Drake , RD /cg Io ° 12893 WhRanga OH.%. Houamn Te 177077.[713)496.7717 ' ,� P 0 got ••4ca08 a H=zWn Ts..@ 77282.0009 e x1.• .. Y.'.\. k, EXHIBIT "C" °L CITY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENAANKE FACILITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i FE—E PROPOSAL (6/13/86) Labor ' Hours Amount Program Manager 64 $3,886 Senior Associate 80 4,453 ' Junior Associate 40 1,822 Draftsman 40 Ii012 $11,173 Direct Expense: i Air Fare: 3 round trips @ $320.00 $960 > Per Diem: 6 days @ $75.00 450 Car Rental: 6 days @ $55.00 330 Mi= printing, postage, telephone 200 zi Handling @ 5 percent 97 2.037 TOTAL $13,210 .i •Y K r M % CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20,"1986 W TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda :. Hackett, 4ssistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 for additional Engineering Design Services by Linville - Civil Engineer's Land Surveyors, Inc. for Archibald Avenue Realigr.-ant and Improvement between 19th Street and Highland Ave:: -j, amount not to exceed $3,751.00 to be funded by the Transportation Development Act, Article 8 Additional engineering services are required for the above mentioned project due to revisions of the street profile and alignment of Archibald Avenue submitted by Cal Trar,s and additional street improvements on Highland Avenue. These design services are in addition to the original design agreement awarded to Linville, Inc. of Rancho Cucamonga, California on June 18, 1986. The Contract Change Order increases the contract price by $3,751 00. The contract fee, therefore will increase from $9,920.00 to $13,671.00 and will be funded by the Transportation Development Act, Article 8. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Contract Change Order No. 1 for additional engineering design service by Linville Inc. for the Archibald Avenue Realignment and Improvement Project for an amount not to exceed $3,751.00. Respectfully submitted, LBH:L .dlw Attachment d // J♦ s n -r 4?� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER C34T ACT FOR Order No.: Archibald Avenue Realignment dnd Improvement From 19th Street to Highland Avenue AA—te: 20, 1986 Ate: T0: Linville Inc. 9333 Base Line Road Suite 190, Rancho Cucamonga 91730 ng neer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. '— DEcREASE INCREA5r- in Contract Price In Contract Price Additional Street Improvements on Highland $2,751.00 Avenue (Approximately 700 ft.) Revisions to Street Profile and Aliqnment by CalTran: 1.000.00 TOTAL $3,751.011 JUSTIFICATION + The amount of the Contract will be (Increased) by the sum of: Three thousand seven hundred fifty one Dollars (33,751M -= The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Thirteen thousand _ six hundre' seventy one _ Dollars ($13.611 - - -� The Contract period provided for completion will be (Unchanged) 0 Days This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: Lloyd u s, City Engineer Date Accepted: Engineer Date Approved: _qty o anc o ucdmonga Date This Inforioation will used as record--of record--of any changes to the original ens neer• n9 'r agreement dated: June 18, 1986 f A- 4 ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cwa STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20, 1986 i 96 TO: City Council and City Manager Hm FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs. City Engineer BY: Blane Frandsen. Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Grove Avenue at ATSF Crossing 2 -99.7 RRP- R079(2) Crossing Modification Please find atrached Program Supplement No 10 to the Master Local Agency - State Agreement for Federal -Aid ProJLCts No 8 -5420 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California. This program supplement provides for railroad crossing modifications at the Grove Avenue at ATSF Crossing 2-99.7 for two (2) nail crossing arms W the relocation of 2 esist'ng crossing devicas to allow for the widening of the street. The suN `'-- -t sets the Federal portion of the prolrct at $139.WO and the City's portion at $15,500 with provision to Increase the city portion siwuld the need arise The Federal portion to be limited to the amount shown. It is to be noted that the City will provide for traffic signals at 8th Street and Grove Avenue ani for pavement widening ip to and away from the railroad crossing with separate construction contacts at City expense as part of Grove Avenue Improvements. Funding for the Supplement Agreement shall be from Systems Development Funds. RECONIE1DAVON it is hereby recommend.d that Program Supplement No. 10 to Local Agency - State Agreement for Federal - Aid Projects No. 8 -5420 be approved by Council Resolution and certified copies of the executed Supplement with approving resolution be sent to the State of California for their execution. Respectfully submitted. C L BH:BFFd w � w Attachments Sv. .y -c •)tilt JI CAIVOtN4—e " AW It,rHwp(A110N A6OKT : (� .r J �/ ��•/ JtO110! OBRM/FW "O. DEPARTMENT OF 1RANSPORTATION oa(M t, ro tot 231 tw ntrutorc. ulovxu vra( tQY i, i aIhCHU C7CLh;U::fd July 30, 1986 08- 8Bd- O -RCUo RRP- Ro79(2) Grove Ave at ATSP Xing 2 -99.7 Mr. Lloyd Rubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 „ •� Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 F { Dear ilr. Nuhbst i Attachgd are two signature copies of Program Supplement tie. 10 to Local Agency -State Agreement No. 08 -5420 for is above-' roforane -d Paderal -Aid project. After exocuti , return the original copies with a certified copy of the authorizing rosolution to this office. Please type in your resolution number and date in the blanks in the t V second oaragrapl: of the agraemeltt. After execution by this files. office, --_ginal copy will be returned for your � If you have any questions, please contact Carl Radsick at (714) ' 383 -4579. s ,I Very truly yours, • J. L. BALCOM a ti i Chief, Local Assistance Att. i� PROGRAM SUPMUNNT No. —to DIST. 8 - SBd- O -RCUC TO PflOJlCT NO. RRP- A079(2) LOCAL AGENCY -{TAT! AGRERIJENT 8-SS2D FOR PIDERAL -AID PROJECT$ NO DATE: 6 -30 -86 This program Supplement IF hereby Incorporated Into the Local Agency -etet• Agreement for Fede•al-Ald Which Wu entered Into between the LOCAL AGENCY and the STATE on 12 -5 -79 and Is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement Is adopted In Eccc.dance With Paragraph 2 of Article 11 of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No.. . approved by Ins LOCAL AGENCY on (Sea LopY attached). The Local AgencY further stlpulsof that 41 a condition to payrn ant of funds obligated to this project. it accepts and WIII comply with tna oonyemnU or remake sat (wlh an the foilowlr-g pages _ Jr. Rancho Cucamonga on Grove Ave at ATSP RR PROJECT LOCATIONS Crossing 2 -99.7 Install 2 19A a Relocate 2 f9 Protective TYPE Of WORK& Devices w /flashing Signals LENGTH: (MILES) PROJECT CLA{SWICATION OR PHASE(/) OF WORKS PREMAINARY ENONMRRING m RIONT-OF -WAY (OtMr) CONSTRUCTION IINGMEERNIG lJ CONSTRUCTION (Porte Account by ATSP) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FEDERAL PUNDS MATCHING FUNDO LOCAL, OTNEFr OTHER: OTHER' 155000 139500 15,500 City of Rancho Cucamonga {TAT{ OF CALk'ORNIV. LOCAL AGENCY DCPARTM{NT OF TRANSPORTATION err Date of Dlewat otnotw of intwPMWIM (THOS of AMllarfsea OHIGM) Attest District 8 Dab {Title) ....................... pon.M :fio sl kowedp� th:t tie %r &�r,e.iund:.we available 1 r this mcumbri....... � •• .r ..................................... /p •S/• Accou ung Officer ote' / - Chapter SIa1Mee em Fiscal Yr. Pregram DC WleporY Fund S:eroe S to tiling) r n: = P District 08 June 30, 1986 Project 8-5420 PlAge 2 of 2 SPECIAL-COVENANTS OR REMARKS I. In executing this Prograt SupplemL%Ital Agroement the Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "NondiAcrimination Assurances" contained in the aforementioned Maxter Agreement for Federal-kid Programs. 2. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be limited to the Detail Estimate amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Pedaral-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2), or i t$ Modification (PR-2A), and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Office of Local Assistance. 3 All required pavement markings and advance warning signs shall conform to the requirements or MUTCO, 1978 and shall be placed in their proper location by the Local Agency at the time of completion of the Railroad's work. 4. The cost of maintenance of the crossing shall be as allocated by the Public Utilities commission. � r PROGRAM UUPIL[M[NT NO. 10 alai. 8 - Sad— O -RCuc TO PROJECT N0. RRP- R079(2) LOCAL AGENCY -aTAT1 AOTr/1M1RT 6 -5420 FDA P09RAL -AID PROJECTS NO. DATE' 6 -30 -86 fhl* Program supplement Is hereby Incorporated Into the Local Agsnay -Slate Agrescu ni tar Federal -Aid which was entered Into between the LOCAL AGENCY and the STATE on 12 -5 -79 _and If subject to all the forma :nJ conditions thereof. This Program i Supoltment is adopted In accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article If of the erorementloted Mo for AgrooC4fll under allthwity of RI /Olnil*n NO. . apPreyed by the LOCAL AGENCY on__ - _ -(Sac Copy attaohod). The LOcal Ap*nay further stlpuldlos that u a condition to Peymonl of road: obligated to this project. It **Copt: and will COMPly with the conyenants of remark: not Win on In followlno pace*. In Rancho Cucalaonga on Grove Ave at ATSF RR MOJECT LOCATIO , Crossing 2 -99.7 Install 2 49A A RGlooate 2 d9 Protective rrra or wogm Devices w /flashing Signals uNOTNt (YIL[a) 'i PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHA31(a) Or WORKi • MXLIWNARY 1N0IMIUlND RIGHT-OP-WAY O (Other) CONITIIUCTION [NON11[IIf1c Q CONSTRUCTION (Force Account by ATSF) t TOTAL ESTIMATUD, COST FEDERAL FUNDS MATCHING FUNDa I LOCAL• OTHER OTHER OTHZR- 155000 139500 15,500 • City of Rancho Cucamoiaga :TAT! Or CAUPOgMU LOCAL AGENCY DEPARTMINT OF TRAAGPORTATION My r Oare [y District Director of Trotle swieum (TtYS of AulkgTaad Official ' Attest: District E Date (Title) + 1 n«ob "lify Upon MY PNeonal knowletlpn that budgeted hMde we available for IMa .oncl mbra... ✓ Aoaawtmg Oltlo«• •Oat. 0/39 t Chapter alandea Item Fiscal Yr. Program 1110'1414901Y Fund Seurco a •+ OiD !% A65 /39 r,. C r I. X6767L A. 1S I 11.E J District 08 June 30, 1986 Project 8 -5420 Page 2 of 2 SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement the Local Agency hereby reaffirms the 'Nondiscrimination Assurances' contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal-Aid Programs. 2. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds gill be limited to the Detail Estimate amounts approved by the Federal Highway Ddministration in the Pederal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2), or its modification (PR -2A), and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid Letter or its modification an prepared by the Office of Local Assistance. 3. All required pavement markings and advanco warning signs shall conform to the requirements of MUTCD, 1978 and shall be 1•: planed in their proper location by the Local Agency at the time of completion of the Railroad's work. 4. The cost of maintenance of the crossing shall be as allocated by the Public Utilities Commission. , S r� ,0 ,a �, M ,,M � � r ova RESOLUTION 110. 3(. ':) t4Sa A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNI'iG OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMEUT NO. 10 TO LOCAL AGENCY -STATE ARREEMENT NO. 08 -5420 FOR CROSSING PROTECTION MODIFICATIONS AT GROVE AT ATSr CROSSIMI 2 -99.7 Cucamonga to: BE IT RESOLVEC by the City Council for and of the City of Rancho 1. Authorize the Execution of Supplement No. 10 to Local Agency -State Agreement No. 08 -5420 for the Installing of 2 !9A Railroad Crossing Protective Devices and the relocating of 2 09 Protective Devices with flashing signals on Grove Avenue north of 8th Street at the A.T. 6 S.F. Railroad Crossing 2 -99.7. 2. To direct the signing of said Supplement and for the return of Certified copies of such to the State of California Department of Transportation along with copies of this resolution. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED to comply with all contents and special covenants or remarks attached to said agreement including: I. Pay ant of Local Agency portion of said agreement estimated at $15,500 and such increases as required to complete such s construction. 2. To Reaffirm the "Nondiscrimination Assurances" contained in the Local Agency greement 8 -5420 for Federal Aid Programs. 3. To agree that the payment of Federal funds for such project will be limited to the Detail Estimate amount approved by tho Federal Highway Administration in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (P.R. -2), or its modification (PR -2A), and to accept any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid Letter of Its modification as prepared by the Office of Local Assistance. a/ U •c 3� r' M-.1 ■: 4. All required pavement markings and advance warning signs shall conform to the requirements of K)TCD. 1918 and shall be placed In their proper location by the Local Agency at the time of completion of the railroad's work. S. Tee cost of maintenan:o of the crossingg shall be allocated by the Public Utilities Commission. x f F Sf t i fi L M rA . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA STAFF RE, POPT DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Butler, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 1986 -87 HOUSING REPAIR /REHABILITATION LOAN CONTRACT WITH BACKGROUND: For the past five years, the City has been offering Lhe Repo r eriice Program for senior, disabled and handicapped residents, and the Rehabilitation Loan Program for law and moderate income residents. Funded through Community Development Block Grants, these prorrams provide funds for necessary repairs such as plumbing improvements, roof repairs, heating, new paint and electrical improvements. The programs are aimed at helping low and moderate income residents maintain a safe and healthy living environment. Since 1982, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has contracted with the County Of San Bernardino to administer the above mentioned Housing Repair /Rehabilitation Loan Programs. The County evaluates loan grant applications, performs home reQelrs, and coordinates rehabilitation loans, as required under the federal regulations for rehabilitation programs supported by Block Grant funds. The FY 86/87 contract extends the terms of the existing agreement through June 30, 1987, The alloted amow,t ($80,000) has been funded by the City Council as a result of Block Grant hearings in April 1986. The County of San Bernardino runs a virtually identical Housing Program on a County -wide basis. The County's Office of Community Development has an established mechanism to administer Housing Assistance Programs. Due to the limited scope of the City's program, rontracting housing rehabilitation to the County appears to be most cost - effective way of providing this seevice. r ;^ 1 f. 4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT August 20, 1986 1966 -07 Housing Repair /Rehab Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the contract between the City of anc o ucamonga and the County of San Bernardino to continue the r implementation of the Housing Repair. Rehabilitation Program be approved. Rep fully s ted ,# Brad Duller City Planner BB:RY:dak Attachment: Contract ms , w, !li ■ 19 .w n ■ a CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 1st day of July, 1986, by and between the COUNTY OF 'W BERNARDINO (hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY ") and the CITY OF RAkvHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, both COUNTY and CITY are eligible to apply for grants from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, pursuant to the provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and t•HCREAS, both COUNTY AND CITY have been approved for funding in tie farm of 4 Community Development Block Grant under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, for the program year beginning July 1, 1986, and ending June 30, 1987; and WHEREAS, both COUNTY snd CITY have each developed a community development plan pursuant to Title I of the Act that includes a Housing Program that will help met the housing assistance needs of lower income persons residing in their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the Departrcr.' -• Housing and Comunity Development (hereinafter referred to as "NCO" , as the COUNTY entity responsible for administer1r,j tim Federal Comsunit,- Development Block Grant Contract and CITY desir, to coordinate their •,fforts to maximize utilization of personnel and resources and increase the efficiency and economics in administering their Housing Assistance Program. NON, THEREFORE, COUNTY and CITY for and in consideration of the mutual promisee and agreements herein contained do agree as follows: i. The purpose of this Agreement is to utilize HCD's repair crews to make repairs on and for Rancho Cucamonga senior and handicapped and disabled homecwners as part of the CITY'S Housing Program. 2. The CITY hereby authorizes the COUNTY to utilize and assume responsibility for COUNTY work crews to accomplish essential repairs on housing units of homeowners in the CITY of Rancho Cucamonga who quali7y for Senior R,apair grants under the CITY'S Community Development Block Grant program guidelines as administered by the COUNTY. 3, 4. COUNTY shall act as tha agent for the CITY in all matters related to assessing, estimating, assigning, and effecting all repair work to be conducted as part of the CITY'S Senior Home Repair Program and Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. b. Each party agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the other party from any and all claims losses and damages occurring or resulting from any negligent or wrongful act or omission of its officers, agents or employees to the performance of this contract. c. The COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY against any liability claims, lasses, demands, and actions incurred by City as a result of determination by the United States Department of Housing mud Urban Development that activities undertaken by County under the program or programs failed to comply with any laws, regulations or policies applicable thereto or that any funds billed by and disbursed to the County under this agreement were improperly expended. d. The COUNTY shall concerning the analysis of the proposed for funding under the but not limited to, the laws or Environmental Review Procedures Grant Programs, and the Califorr amended; and that COUNTY will i reviews in their offices and sr records for Rehabilitation Loans ly with all, federal regulations Aal environmental impacts of work dlitation Loan pT..ogram including, iorities listed in 24 CFR Part 58, itle I Community Development Block vironmental Quality Act of 1974 as in records of these environmental copies to CITY of complete review have been approv ^.d. 4. the terms of this agreement shall become effective on the date mentioned above and shall continue in full force and effect during the CODG Program year, beginning July 1, 1985 and ending June 30, 1987 or until conclusion of the program; in any event either COUNTY or CITY may terminate this program relationship by giving the other party a written notice 30 calendar days before termination is to take effect. S. a. COUNTY agrees to process to completion < minimum of nine (9) Housing Rehabilitation Loans. b. COUNTY agrees to perform all necessary work to complete a minimum of twenty -five (25) Senior llama Repair program grants. c. COUNTY administrative costs shall not exceed 252 of the program funding. Administrative costs shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: grant and loan processing, legal fees, title reports and supplies. In no event shall administrative costs exceed $1,500 per Housing Rehabilitation loan and $1,000 per Senior Home Repair grant. v� d. COUNTY and CITY declare that all work performed in accordance with this agreement shall not exceed a total of $80,000. The work covered by this agreement shall consist of Repair and Rehabilitation Loan activities. Reasonable efforts wilt be made to expend 60% on the Loan program, which is to include deferred and formal assurance, as well as regular loans, and 40% on the Senior Nano Repair Program. 6. CITY shall assume sole responsibility for planning and implementing all outreach activities and efforts and for the printing and dissemination of all written material. 7. a. HCD shall submit itemized monthly statements of work performed, the number of applications received, the number of enrollments, and the number of completions. Ethnicity of clients whose work has been completed is to be provided monthly for purposes of reporting to HUD. b. At the close of each quarter of the program year. COUNTY shall bill CITY for costs incurred during that quarter, pursuant to the terms of this agreement. B. In the event this agreement is terminated by any party for any reason, COUNTY shall be paid by CITY for all services rendered on the basis of the percentage of work completed on the date notice of termination is given, and except for the obligations described in Paragraph 3b and 3c of this Agreement, neither party shall have any further obligation under this Agreement. 9. CITY and COUNTY hereby eo to meet in an informal meeting to resolve all disputes arising ou or relating to this. Agreement or the breach thereof. 10. CITY and COUNTY hereby agree that the employees nlred to work in the repair program described herein will meet the minimum standards currently required in the COUNTY'S Housing Program. 11. All information obtained from or about the participant shall be used solely for °he purpoes of this Program and for determining eligibility. The names of participating individuals and all information obtained from or about them will be held in absolute confidence by the CITY and the Department of Housing and Community Development and its employees. Any information requested by other County departments, State, local, or federal agencies which would permit the identification of a participant or his /her address will be ranted only upon receipt of a written permission from the program participant. /a? 1 4i IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the governing bodies of the parties hereto have authorized this Agreement and have caused the said Agreement to be executed as of the date hereof. By: By: 1ia/or chairman Board of Supervisor. AT-.ST ATTEST: City or APPROVED AS '0 FORM: By: City orney 4 ueputy APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Alan K. Narks COUNTY COUNSEL Deputy Couity ow:se Dated: 4. ,s ATTACHMENT /1 Program Expenditures Total City Program Expenditures $80,000 Program Expenditures by percentage and Dollars 1) Housing Rehabilitation Loan program 605 of $80,000 - $4600 b) Senior Repair Program 405 of SbO,ODO • S32,000 11 /13 /84 /JJ 10/07/86/WJ HP2 -RAN COC AGM .P 1. A. . '11, CPYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e STAFF REPORT 't DATE: August 20, 1986 a M: City Council and City Manager 19?7 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Cnglieer BY: Judy Acosta, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement and Security i` for Tract No. 10035, located on the south and east side of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon, submitted by Rancho Associates, Ltd. On March 20, 1985, the City Council approved, the Fianl Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract No 10035. The subject tract is located on the south and east side of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon. The developer, Rancho Associates, Ltd., is requesting an exterion of their impro,emeit agreement and security due to economic reasons that are causing then. *, delay their construction. It is recommended that Council approve the imorovement agreement aid security. Rr_JNti: `TIOM It I, recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approv.ny mprovement Extension Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract h- -0035 until January 31, 1987. Respec fully subbnitPd, LBH•JA. lw Attachments , C t 2 J.5 d .M e 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGHfEEMG DIVmox prii 4: w.A ..1. 1h TTTX. TRACT 10035 TniL. EXHMM. viriNiTV NAP a r I RESOLUTION NO. 8S. -ay-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10035 0t WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on July 28, 1986 by Rancho Ass,uiates, Ltd. as Developer, for the improvement of public right- of -wAy adjacent to real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to "e done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to s Tract 10035; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1: iden•ified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ccf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on )ehalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ' / / � w g •. 13-D e l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: Jim Bart. Administrative Services Director SUEJECrt B Poll LAW Atp OR-EMWT rral 1977 Currently, all law enforcement activities are provided from a single 6,000 square foot building located an 9tb Street in Rancho Cucamonga. Fith'the growth of the City and subsequent growth of services needed. the facilities currently utilized fa- law enforcement activities has becoae inadequate. Recently, Remaa, Inc., who we lease the current building from, notified the City that the building just south of the currently leased building is vacant and available for lease. As a temporary measure to relieve some of the space pressure for law enforcement until the public safety facility is constructed, staff is recommending that the City lease the additional 60000 square foot building for law enforcement. Captain Putacber has stated he vocld relocate thu patrol function into the aft building. The terms of the now lease would be the same as the currant lease: $1.800 per mouth, plus the City makes all tenant improve•,ent.. To accomplish the lease for the new building and maka tenant impravememts, we need an appropriation of $28,000 from the 1986 -87 General Fund Unallocated balance as follovs: ;18.000 into 01- 4245 -6028 (contract services. leases and rents) and $10,000 into 01 -4245 -7043 (building improvements). RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the Mayor to sign the lease for the building at 93:0 Jersey, Rancho Cucamonga, at a cost of $1,800 per month, and allocate $28,000 from the 1986 -87 General Fund unallocated balance as follows: $18,000 into 01- 4245 -6028 and $10,000 into 01 -4245 -7043. Respectfully submitted, .G� Jim Bart Admicistrative Services Director JB:cv al.+ CITY OF FANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT t r E z` } � A Z 1V77 DATt: August S8, 1966 TO; City Council and City Manager FROM: Beverly A. Authelet, City Cler SUBJECT' ADDED GdBEBT CALCaDAV STEM Approval to eat public bearing for September 3, 1986 - fay2eD aKm ABBEBBMFJIT AND DEV9.OPME4T DISTRICT AMENDMMT96A1 - BRDCL DXVrLOPMENT - A Development District Amendment from Office /Profeaoional to Loa Medium Residential (4-8 du /sc) for 3.67 acrQs of lead, located at the cortbvect corner of Archibald Avenue god 19th Street - APJ 202- 1091 -21. BAA /djs a a tm n 0 ;r Msm nD D A VrUn rTTr A AfnNrA STAFF REPORT LM DATE: August 20, 1995 TO: City Council and City Manager '�A�, PROM: Mark R. Lorimer, Administrative Annlyzt *-4_ SUBJECT: ,y$.POTIQI PROCESS PO 91- PROFIT POUBDATIOB The Council's subcommittee to detaraine qualifications and procedures fee the appointment of non- profit foundation members has submitted its selection criteria to the City Council. The subcommittee recommended the following criteria when selecting foundation board members: 1. go political patronage when considering appointees. 2. Past history of community involvement or commitment to civic activity- 3 Understanding of public finance and charitable organization finance, if possible. 4. Community respect, image and reputation. 5 Previous foundation experience, if possible. 6. Fund raising experience through YMCA, United Nays church or other activities. At this paint, it would be appropriate for the City Council to provide staff with direction a to the selection process and the terms of office for the non- profit foundation members. The focndation bylaws currently allow for the selection process whereby each of the five member Board of Directors is nominated by each of the City Council members to serva for terms which coincide with the terms of each City Coune {1 member. Those nominated shall be elected by a tbree- fiftbs (3/5) vote of the full City Council. To date. the City Council bas discussed the prospect of each Council member nominating two qualified persouss with the entire Council selecting five members from that list of ten individuals. In the event the City Council decides to select from the list of ten nominees, it will be necessary to establish specific terms of office for those appointed to the Board of Directors. It will be necessary to amend the foundation bylaws in order to allow for this alternative selection process. 133 W r 3 Selection Process for Von- Profit Foundation Page 2 August 20, 1956 Again, staff looks for Council direction regarding the selection process and the terms of office for the foundation menbors. After receiving such direction, staff will prepare soy necessary amendments to the foundation bylaws for Council approval. Should you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please do cot hesitate to contact me at your convenience. MRL /d j■ /3V Y a f OcfglO a CITT COUNCIL MOUIO ]o.a 16. 1966 Dl. A sea( rcleef M DILEG nMU L r LUM jpjWacA rawJa9ia a'MaOAtta, (AM.at ad Dahl) Report. rue ode by Cooa- c11w Debt and Ceaxilue Mgu.t. Cc...11u. Dahl pointed out that the sabcoedtcae co.atatlng of biWlf and Caumlluo Bcquat bad ca.. up with a list of g.altltcatiaee as follows, 1. so political paeteana wb" toasidartap .ppotote's. ' T fast history of ceoao.itl lovalneast or cosedtsast to civic ectivitl. 1. Dad.rstaadlng of public fin. =e .ad cbariabte ogasl.atioo flancw if possible. . t. 4ou.itl rmpect, tune am ....atios. 5 frmicve lovuastloa ex#Mouse it pa.atbl.. 6 lead rattly "parts=@ tbronh ?MCA. baited Vrye church of other ac- tLSlti". Conctlua Began pointed out that Caaacfl hod previeeaty alkad about ascb Caencilseeber .ubalttin two same. gain, tbtmpb an tetm/siV #races.. and Concit ..i@etin male. ft.. that Irmp of tea. That mtbod would ceeflict with the byle# •bleb ap=ifi . that Barb Caverit...ban •ry As ..a@ .p=l=anet ,blab mid c lucid. Ltb his tn. of efflc@. dgor fl., suggested but they no ..d tbroug! the Inn lowing pr=at. the. o =b Cooeelleaeber allot one from the list of tee. Council.,& Mlk@ls placed net that people who have "peril. =e lea Von 1 -5. would ant necessarily base fund rdeing uperie =e listed as go. 6 C6 ... Lt . Vright co=nrd that people .oald tell Leto as@ category or the .that. $be asked it sae ranted dl the people with tnndral.la6 "pate=.. or did we vast a alas oat that Sosad? Cc ... it new tllk.n peer/* -ed *bat was the porpoa of the Board? If the eel& p. -pee. of the Bard sea to raise fads. the, Tell. toad.. 4e=ttuo #Moat nated that the Latest was wen clear set tkat was act So wake It a single inure t or • Slagle purpose organUetloo. Mayor King epr+eaed that we needed people who had "parlena• is the bogies; with tend catalog. Cao =iluen Debt =latd out that annually the ergasAattoa would sue Lod. Sweden of-the City led the city 4 - -till therefore. the people broudht la to, ' the fmdratslag eopaleme ibo.ld also be of the "Scott,# level to run the er- aaisatlon. 4s, =flue Debt e.Warnd with the Sea ... I direction 4u.. it vas to" gl that at the frost •ad woo hove • fund total.$ group sad the- later oat, the actual /e.datloe would take seer. ' 4v -cLlma Mlkats n.td that be liked W. 6M.n's suggestion of having comatte" that .sold provide Input free the coemooiry to the Board. 11 4=etl vast is that directive. then Commit needed to !omits# •bit two -tlaed ap- pra=b ACTIOI gryor @y stated that .11 sere tbadd be ..b.ttid by the July 16 meeting. At that rise, tbry =std a" asp the Interview preccn. hopefully to be held late July at early August. 4aacil counted to Sake a their find .e-. - . ISctloo at the and of August,' At that sees ties, tba, could sdder the clti- a..'s auxiliary group. I ' /35� .1 i 1 August 20, 1986 TO: CITY CODIICIL From Dick Dahl Re: Agenda Item "D "2 1 would like to see added -to the agenda the following items: A. Feasibility of utilizing reclaimed water for parks.:ity lardscapeing and /or private industrial landscape maintenance. B. Water districts long range plans for serving our expanding City (an overview). C What can the City do to aid in an overall conservation pro- gram in cooperation with the Water District. Dick Dahl /36 i t Y+ y � jA I i CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Keck R. Lorimer, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: QITT ACTION ON ZOM TSH& As directed by the City Council at its August 6. 1986 neetiog, staff has sent the attached letter to Mr. James Smith of General Telephone expressing the City's concerns regarding the newly implemented ZUM plan for the Etivands area. The letter clearly apalls out the current problems the ZUM plan hus created and reiterates the City's support for all residents affectr:d by the plan. Os bw�e requested a response from General Telephone to our letter by August 20, 1986. Staff will update the events of this .sue in an oral report to the Council as dovelopments occur. Should you have any questions or comments relative to the ZUM plan, please contact me at your convenience. MWdja Attached 137 r� 0 0 t August 20, 1986 6TE General Telephone Company of California Post Office 90.2920 Pon ono CA 917C9.2920 714 629 9911 in r arty Pe M1 To 6650 M Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road. Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Rizzo: Thank yon for your letter of August 11. 1986, ccncerning the ZIRi Rate Change I, too, am very concerned with this matter as it effects our customers in the Etiwanda Exchange. A copy of your letter was hand carried to our Revenue Requirements Vice President. The ZUM Change as it effects Etiwanda is currently under review by his staff. I appreciate the Council's concern about a prompt resolution of this matter and have personally expressed this through telephone conversations with our Revenue Requirements staff. I'm sure that you can appreciate that our rate structure schedules are extensive and complicated and it will require time to research the ZUfi plan as it effects Etiwanda. .. Please be assured that we are moving as expeditiously as possible on this matter and will keep you informed as developments occur. If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our District Manager, Hal Overton, at (714) 865 -1509. Very truly yours. ra� ' AL SMITH Division Manager cc: City Council Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager Deborah Brown AV,,, C Coraaal,on ! f] / l . 1. August 20, 1986 In our review of this particular r.rte implementation, we found that the point of rate netermination for the Etiwanda Exchange is closer to the Rialto EKChange than to the (mtario Exchange. Under the current rate schedule, Rialto is a local call and Ontario is a ZUN call. This point of rate determination is wiUrin the state wide toll structure for the State of California. The only wary to resolve the concerns of the Etiwanda customers and give them local calling to Ontario i, `or General Telephone to file a request with the PUC to move this point of rate determination. The pre.sent point of rate determination is a part of the overall toll plan for the State. Any change of this point would require input from all customers affected. Jr, the event this rate point is changed, all PAC ITL custcu-s in the Rialto Exchange would lose Etiwanda as a free call and Etiwanda would then become a toll call from Rialto. The same would be true for Etiwanda customers calling Rialto. Etiwanda Exchange customers would then be eble to make local calls to the Ontario Exchange. Sf the Public Utilities commission agrees with our request, they woad hold public her, —ing^ at which time all parties affected by this change. both General Telephone customers in Etiwanda and PAC TEL customers in Rialto would have the epportunity to respond to this matter. The Commission would review our request, and the customer input from the hearings and make the final determination whether this rate point should be changed. 137b H c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA z �•� CaW„ J Non D ,.a D. MMd. l� Nchud K D.N Paw.1, J. ordain August 11. 1966 Mr. James A. Smith, Fowna Valley Division Uaoager Cenerel Telephone Company 280 Bast Locust powna, California Dear Mr. Snitbn It has been brought to the City of Rancho Cucamongi a attention the ZOM plan recently implemented on June 10 1986 within our area has created tremendous controversy smug the residents in the Eastern portion of our City with the 899 prefix. On Wednesday, August 6, 1986. the City Council heard testimony from residents expressing strong opposition to the newly implemented ZUM plan for the prefix 899. Concerns which have generated such opposition include the following points: 1. Under the new 20M plan, residents are new asses..e1 a toll charge for making all calls to the adjacent City of Ontario. There is concern for toll charges assessed for calling public service oriented agencies located in Ontario. Among the more important Jwblic service agencies are the following: - West End Sheriff's Statiao - Employment Development Department - Welfare Department - Environmental Health Services - Assemblyman Chuck Bader's Office (local area representative) Fire Dispatch in Ontario (serving Raucbo Cucamonga) - Ontario Community Hospital - District Attorney's Office - Office on Aging providing senior !nformatioa and referral, legal services, etc. - Cbaffey Onion High School District - General Telephone - Southern California Can Company - Southern California Edison Company - Daily Report (local newspaper) /,39 14SH1?JERDAD4U1TEC. POSTOF- VEROX107. PANCHOCUCAMONOA.CALJFOEMA91730. (711)999.1931 General Telephone Company Page 2 August 11, 1986 There in strong coanern for Ceaeral Telephone's decieion to designate err ZUM areas witbia one City boundary. Dividing one C' y not only segregates our residents, however it also discriminates again., those rbo swat pay toll charges to call Ontario. We have two very good examples with public service providers within the 899 prefix. Firstly, Etivanda Higb School (serving the Eastern portion of Rancho Cucamonga) withi^ the Chaffay Union aigb Scboo? District, May, 1986 telephone charges were approximately $848.00 ( prior to the new Z@1 plea). The June, 1986 bill with the am ZUM plan doubled the charges to approximately $1,759 for the saw basic calling patterns. Moreover, June is the month ethool is let out for the summer, and the cost impc:t is only a partial picture. Secondly, fire station nuwbee 3 in ebe 899 prefix, had a telephone bill of $44.51 for May, 199:, end in June, 1986 had skyrocketed to $91.10 for basicly the same pbona usage. This is two examples of public service providers where the charges for besscly the lame telephone calling patterns resulted in over a 100% increase in service ebstree. 4. Concern has been expressed as to the telephone company's attempt to resolve this issue on • local level. After concerns were expressed for the new ZUM Plans a study was issued by Central Telephone to evaluate calling patterns ;. within the subject area. Residents opposing the 2UM plan questioned the bias of such a study in the 899 prefix where residents are leas likely to call the Ontario •rag since they are aware that such calls involve toll charges. After hearing all public testimony at the August 6, 1986 meting, the City Council concurred with those concerns expressed by the resideau of the Eastern Portion of Rancho Cucasocgs. Pursuant to City louncLl direction, this letter serves as our official notice to General Telephone that the City of Rancho CucamcuZa oppose the implementation of the new ZUM plan which vent into effect June 1, 1986 for the 899 prefix area. At this point, the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends Coastal Telaphcuo petition the Public Utilities Commission for a good cruse deviation which would immediately cancel the ZUI plan within the subject area. While the City concurs with General Telephone representatives that a study evaluating calling within the area is necessary, it would be most appropriate for Coastal Telephone to revert back to a method of billing prior to June 1, when the ZUM plan was Implemented in order to allow for an impartial and fair study to be conducted. Cancelling the current ZUM plan and ioitiatiag the new unbiased study would suggest Cenerd Telephone's toms tweet to servicing their customers and demonstrate the Company's good faith in resolving such a critical concern. The City Council $tresses that it doom not wish to top ad unnecessary time and effort at pursuing a resolution to this matter. The City hopes that an appropriate direction is established by General Telephone iu resolving this matter to the satisfaction of those affected residents within Rancho Cucamonga. Additionally, we request that a response to this letter be provided to the City Council no later than August 20, 1986. /39 General Telephone Compaq • " Page 5 ;.x August 11, 1986 - a ' On behalf of the entire City CDU�;i L. I wish to express our confidence that this critical problem will be resolved. Th a City Council unanimously supports those residents affected by the ZOM plan aid but stated publicly its commitment to bringing about an appropriits resolution to this problam. As always, the 1 City is user to assist General Telephone in any'vay possible to resolve this concern. t" + If I may be of any assistance to you, please do not hesitate to cortact me at (714) 909 -1051. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. %r Sincerely. i a is „b�' Ar Assisten L7 l usgsr BAB/dja cc: City Council 6aureu M. Wasserman, City Manager Deborah Brown w O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM 0 a ?tC C' Date, August 15, 1986 To, City Council and City :onagai Prom, 8111 Mollly, Director, community services Depart. t Subject, Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library Service Daprovavent Report 11 1 (Information only - not submitted so a fomal Staff Report) This report is being filed with City Council As an informational update on onr City'a continuing efforts to improve library services to the residents in Rancho Cucamonga. Recapping briefly what his happened to date toward achieving that goal, • Situational analyst, and problem identification, • Inadequate Schedule of evening operation hours to Serve public, • Inadequate material on hand, particularly in the area of reference works and childrers material, • Inadequate staff resources, • Inadequate information available about financial operation from Central Library Services in San Bernardino. In discussion of the above we have personally met w_th County Officials on several occasions this year. (Supervisor McElwain once, Al Reid, General Services Director, once, and, Barbara Andurson, Couaty Librarian, three tines.) Additionally we have worked closely with Diane Williams and Charlie Miller of the local Priends or the Library organization. Through these discussions, two action were taken at the Drench on July 21, which wwre, e Increasing scheouls of operation to be open until 0,00 p.m. Sour nights a week rather than two as was previously the case. While thin may not sound like a 'big deal', I think it in an important first step in recognizing the needs of the client users first, rather than concentrate on only the technical deficiencies. After all, Rancho can have the technically beat Branch in the entire County, but tf its not adequately open for use, then we still have the problem. , • Changing Librarians. According to two reliable and very knowledgeable 'local sources', thin has been a pivotal move toward improving service. with the new librarian, Andy Swanson, attitudes of staff have changed dramatically for the better, according to the 'local sources'. There in a whole /�O l w 'new positive feel' that one perceives in the Rancho Branch. Swanson regardo the Friends If Lle Library as a resource and ally rather than a nuisance and An adversary as the previous director had, again according to the 'local sources'. working together, Swanson and the friends have implemented the beginnings of Video service at the RAncbo Branch, previously available at most other Branches and not at Ranchu. Donations by the Priendu of new office equipment, that is, deok and chain and work tables ' allows the staff to work bettrr and more effectively, therefore, happier. Suffice to say, an indlvimal's 'approach' towards a mission can make the difference between success and failure, as is clearly demonstrated in this case. So with these two changes, increased accessibility and Lmprovsd 'approach' by staff, wo have met the necessary basin in place for anything else we do to matter. What is the next move? In correspondence to "tbara Anderson on July 8 (attached) we asked for a stratagy to be daveloped for improving the available resources at the branch. we asked for that to be completed by August 17. We received a rooponse from Mdenon on August 6 (attached) which if you read paragraphs one and two closely, they nay nothing other than business me usual through the normal budgetary process. gowever, in paragraph three, we have an opening. The Frierds of the Library group has gone County -wide. This was probably in direct response tc• the Grand Jury Report suggesting that a Library Board be fomad. While this groups mmhership appears to me to have been stacked with several county mployses as repreeentatives of Branchas, Charlie Miller is the Provident of the group. We are working together on strategies to make his presidency work to our advantage in getting the County to respond to our needs. until the ourreut supervisor leaves, we can count an no help from that Area in my view. Bottom line in this, we will keep communication open with Al Reid and Barbara Anderson, work ciose'y with Charlie Willer and the Friend.: and wait until December. I will keep you pouted an weeks go by on activities in this area. p.8. An same of thA comments arc rather blunt in the above, I chose not to include it in the agenda as a staff report. Mks 0 r. CITY OF KANCHO CUCAMONGA r f Mew J,Ngxw r..a.�s.. CieW L aq7 D im D. Ma,b 1977 Sk"M K MW Rmda J. Wash, July 8'r1986 RerhAra Andaraon, Crurty LSlhrary IOa went Pm,rth Street, Pirst Ploor Bar Bernardino, California 97415 Dear Mo. Anderson, J Thank you for your memorandum of July 1, 1988, detailing operational costs of the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library. It was quite belptul and much Appreciated. In addition to the above, we had-spoken June 11, in a meeting with Al Rein, of developing a plan by which ww codld upgrade library services in our area over the next several years. you have already implemented a first step of that 'upgrade' by increasing the number of hours of public availability during the evening. The next step might properly be to lay out a written, technical strategy with goal@, timelines and a mothodology for upgrading the number of voluuns shelved at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch. Prm our perspective, this would be an area more within your expertise than ours, but we would like to be involved none the less, tc land what over assistance you may request. Additionally, and more perhaps within our area of latituce, is the 'solicitation' of broad based support for our plan, once developed, to upgrade not only the Rancho Cucamonga Braric,t Library, but the County Library Systm as a whole. From wr perspective the two would probably go hand in hand, as you would not intentionally Bet out to oak* one Branch superior to another. l qv e 93203ASBLMEROAD AMC • POSrOMC8BOXWT • R?NCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA91730 a (714)989.1911 z �i or Nn. AMeraon, County Library July P, ON v papa R I vould propose that ve sat a target date of August 11, 1966 to have an improvenent plan developed for the rancho Cucanonga branch Library. This vould include where to go. ..and of courae,'what it will take to do that and how long. How does that sound to you? Let me knw. cordially, 7 Ilia L. Holley, .unity services Director HLH,ba CA, La,,re0 HABBOnman, City Manager Al Raid, Goneral services ?Aminlatrator e 1 t r s • Y A 16' iJ;1�`'� °�" ;n •rya `t. .7 ^ Fs iii ti,r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' C wv..IdB•y pot o a > Chula, L Sava U Jae D. l6ads 1977 P46M Al. Dw pmts L Wd&U July 17, 1986 Al Reid Assistant County Administrative Officer 385 North Arrowhead Avdaue Fifth Floor Sao Bernardino, California 92415 -0120 Dear Alt The recent Creel Jury Deport concerning library service■ contained a recommendation that there be some typo of regional library facility located somewhere in the seat and of gap Bernardino County. The purpose of this letter is to suggest that the appropriate location for an additional regional library site may be in Rancho Cucamonga. The City presently was a 99 -acre parcel which we intend to develop as a future park site. It is our view that a library would fi., in with that park plan very well, and in addition would same a great may residents of the went and as a regional facility. If the County can finance a library structure, the City would be willing to contribute to the project by offering the land for the facility. Please let us know if there is any opporrunity t,, proceed with the Crand Jury recov ndatious by constructing a futurr library in Reach* Cucamonga on our City Park property. We would very web like to work with the County to achieve this important objective. On another matter. we wish to thank oath you and Barbara Anderson for your cooperation in helping to to evaluate library services in Rancho Cucamoaga. We both have the same goal, and tbap is to provide the highest level of service we can. You my be assured that the City will work with you in whatever way possible to achieve that goal. / VOL e 91208ASTLO7EROAD.SUrrEC • FOSTOMCEBOX607 • RANCNOCUCAMONOA.CAL60RNIA91730 • (111)91f•1u1 stn Library Services July 17. 1986 Page 2 Sbaaka again for your cooperative spirit and cooperation during the past Pew �t W.nths. Wa are looking forward to continuing discussions regarding a future w regional library conplm in Rancho Cucamoga. Sincerely,, t vauren H. Wasserman City Manager j LMW /kep t cc. City Council Rill volley a A Yl .�i BARBARA ANDERSON CaamT Ubmim, ALBERT BE r.1PR1O Au(Rant CMVY Ullie n August 8, 1988 r 1853 ^ County of San Bernardino GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY la wat ab Stnat San Donut LM CA 024I54MS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LIBRARY (714) 283-2134 Ur William L Holley Community Services Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr Holley: In beginning to develop a Plan for change in service level for Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library, it became obvious that the needs of one branch could not be addressed without affecting operations in othurs It also became apparent that the needs of all the libraries in the West End of the Ccunty should be considered. The budget request for this year bat been submitted to suntran the current level of service which includes the recently added open hours for the branch A revised long -range plaa is being developed for the County Library System, partially as one Repeat of continuing planning and partially in response to recommendations of the recent Grand Jury Report. It should be completed by early 1987 to be considered by the Board of Supervisors in funding allottments for 1987/1988. So, while a plan is being developed, it is in the initial stage sad not quite ready to be able to pull out a section relating to a particular branch as yet I am sorry not to meet your August 11 target date for an imprpvoment plan, but will keep in communication as a plan is developed The recently formed Board of the Friends of San Bernardino County Library, of which Charlie Miller is President, and other citizen groups will be involved in developing and evaluating a masterplan. The independent libraries of Ontar.o, Upland and Pomona will also be contacted for comment as their plans also affect services available for County Library veers RDBInr B. Nb+t lO[I / (lv,/y2. Bow n1 C.W' MY.0 I B \RUARA ClWl RIOROXN T?'A LN"I ALUm1T R. HER%Adanv+l .. ! CAL WFLUAIN HDUi HIa TO"NITNI .r"uth ino= GcneN Sa"4c, AJ,ncy I ROBERT 11 \I1.it1CA nllb vwY r. ;4 In the meantime, you may note the changes in Rancho Cucamonga Branch which have occurred - extended hours, now personnel, - and those which will happen during this next year - increased materials budget, iustallstion of a video collection, closer working relationships with City offices and community members - and the long -range plans (as yet not entirely specific) to upgrade all County branch librarics in terms of facilities, materials, staffing and services. Please continue to include the County Library in your discussions of expanded community recreations and cultural facilities. Sincerely, S `may Barbara Anderson County Librarian cc: Al Reid, GSA ve'2 loo SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ..... ' . T INAL"REEPORT"'- Q '-? 1 9854986 e .-.0 I BACKGROUND 'e X614 "IM111.1Ail it The County Library system Is Composed of 28 oranches and four bookmobiles. Support services and coordination are provided by an administrative facility In San Bernardino The system was established In 1914 to provide limited servicm to rural areas. It has not been able to keep pace with the change to a county of highly concentrated populations In a hign tech society Every day the world produces more than 1,000 new book titles Every year the United States government alone generates more than 100,000 reports plus more than 451,000 articles, •books and papers. World -wide, more than 60 million pages of scientific and technical litera- ture are developed annually, continually outdating books shelved In San Bernardino County libraries. Knowledge that once was stored only In books and perlodicals now is obtained from video and audio tapes, records, compact discs, mlcrofllm, microfiche and computers with access to huge national and International data banks. 42 Property taxes ordinarily would help Increase funding as population Increased but they have been curtailed since Proposition 13. In distributing what Is left, the library system has often been left wanting. Population Is concentrating In metropolitan areas or newly incorporated cities. The latter generally decline to establish their own libraries due to cost. The General Services Committee developed a 28 -Item questionnaire to assess libraries In the West End, East Valley and Central Valley. There was considerable variation In findings among branches, but sufficient similarity to Indicate attention might profitably be given to most Items studlod. FINDINGS Of the twelve library systems In the state, each of which pro ,ldes serrvlcd to over 500,000 parsons, San Bernardino County has the lowest appropriation of library funds per capita, $6.63, as compared with an average of $10.73 and a high of $18.70. The County Is also among the lowest In terms of circulation, use of references and nu• ^tor of full -time employees. In comparison wlth neighboring counties (Orange, Rlversldo, Kern), San ternardlno County has the lowest expenditures per capita. Augmentation funds granted to supplement Proposl- tibn 13 property tax losses are below tho 1979 level. American Library Association Standards require 2.0 books per capita. According to Library porsonnel, In 1980 the total for San Bernardino County was 1.411. Since then It has dropped to 1 174. Because of the knowledge cAploslon, reference books are quickly outdated while their cost skyrockets every branch visited complained of a desperatd need for more reference books When a collectr�n Is enlarged. readership Increases. However, despite an Inadequate c- ^tlon, circulation in the County still Increased by 12 pe.cent last year due to the growth In population. The concentration of population and the demands of a technological society requires at least one library In the West End as largo as the Feldheym Library In San Bernardino (65,000 square feet) with attendant services. 43 lto �� (A similar building should be planned for the high desert when there Is a population concentration in excess of 100,000, but the largest projected is only 20,000 square feet.) Two of the four bookmobiles have traveled over 200,000 miles and will need replacement at a cost of botwsen $80,OCO and $120,000 each. Personnel at *]meat every facility visited pointed to the need for additional spaces for communit; -_. Ings. Employee work spaces generally are too small for efficient use. The central administration provides excellent support In acquisition, cataloging and access to all materials through Its Computer system. The system as a whole functlons with reasonable efficiency (except as noted) considering Its limited fiscal resources. It deserves commendction for its State - funded Adult Literacy Program which has Involved some 700 readers. Almost no attention Is given to security Patrons can enter and leave most buildings unobserved. As a result there Is a considerable loss of materials through theft. Checkout areas are not properly located to prevent patrons from leaving the buildings unobserved. None of the branches has security alarm systems that prevent unauthorized removal or damage to materials from the building. Physical condition of grounds and buildings gener- ally Is adequate although leaky roofs and minor repairs require prompt attention. There are Insufficient regular visits to branches by central administrators for formal Inspection There are no Inventories. Losses or size of the collection cannot be accurately daternined The card Index, Information 61 the computer and materiels actually on hand do not match. There Is Inadequate coordination with local schools In regard to hours of operation, books on reserve for students and titles to be maintained In the collection. 44 /Ya,C as (10141't- y c C 6l Aside from Joint membership In the Inland Library System, there Is little cooperation between city and County libraries. There are some soaciol reading programs In most branches, but nslde from summer reading programs no centrally developed goals and` objectives to Increase library use. Some branches are not obtaining maximum use of community support through "Friends of the Library" or volunteers. More attention could be given to obtaining support from service clubs or other community organi- zations. There Is no County -wide library board. There Is no program to ar•ange for elimination of branches when population is concentrated Into munlcl- pelities. There is no cooperative program with cities to Indox local publications. There Is no program to maintain complete collections of some periodicals Ln each or the branches. 5 RECOMMENDATIONS THAT A COUNTY -WIDE LIBRARY BOARD BE ESTABLISHED WITH MEMBERSHIP LARGE ENOUGH TO PERMIT GEO- GRAPHICAL REPRESEN'ATION AND MEMBERSHIP BY COM- MUNITY, EDUCATIONAL AND BUSINESS LEADERS. THAT THE FIRST RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BOARD BE TO DEVELOP A LONG -RANGE PLAN WITH GOALS AND OBJEC- TIVES, SIMILAR TO THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC ,,..;.1 ^� LIBRARY'S STRATEGIES FOR SERVICE. THAT THE COUNTY SET FUNDING TARGETS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES THAT WOULD GRADUALLY BPING THE SAN BERNARDINO SYSTEM TO AT LEAST THl' MEDIAN FOR rc� SYSTEMS OF ITS SIZE. THAT THE LIBRARY BE GIVEN A LARGEk !HARE OF THE AUGMENTATION FUNDS AS A MEANS OF COk..ECTING PAST DEFICIENCIES IN FUNDING. THAT REGIONAL TAX ELECTIONS JE HELD TO ALLOW COMMUNITIES THAT WISH, TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL `.....��aa FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR LIBRARIES LOCATED IN THEIR D . AREA. as (10141't- s , THAT ,THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND CITY GOVERN- MENTS CONSIDER LIBRARIES AS WORTHY BENEFICIARIES OF REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PASS - THROUGH. FUNDS, -- BUILDERSE AND DEVELOPERS' FEES AND LEVIES, AS ARE OTHER SEGMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY. THAT THE COUNTY 1- IBRART,4N DEVELOP COORDINATING COMMITTEES IN RAPIDLY GROWING AREAS SUCH AS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CHINO, YUCAIPA AND "THE HIGH DESERT TO PREPARE PLANS FOR CENTRAL LIBRARIES EQUAL AT LEAST TO FACILITIES EXISTING IN UPLAND, ONTARIO OR COMPARABLE CITIES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTIES. _ THAT CITIES TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR LIBRARY SERVICES BY PROVIDING THE BUILDINGS AS NEEDED, TAKING POSSESSION` OF BOOKS PRESENTLY IN THE BRANCHES AND CONTRACTING WITH THE COUN'iY TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES THAT SECURITY PROGRAMS AND STRUCTURAL MODIFICA- TIONS BE DEVELOPED, INCLUDING A MARKED BOOK SYSTEM, TO PREVENT THEFT IN ALL BRANCHES. THAT CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION MAKE REGULAR VISITS TO BRANCHES, USING A STANDARD CHECKLIST TO ASSIST BRANCHES 14N IMPROVING SERVICES THAT EACH BRANCH ANNUALLY EVELOP A SET OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. , THAT CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION KEEP A DATED FILE CN STRUCTURAL /MAINTENANCE / PERSONNEL NEEDS FOR EACH BRANCH AND COMMUNICATE WITH THE COUNTY ADMINI- STRATIVE OFFICE, PERSONNEL OR FACILITIES MANAGE- MENT IF THERE IS UNDUE DELAY IN CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES 46 rl rl l aI i ,Fr .F F, DRAFT FRIENDS OF CUCAMONGA- GUASTI RELTONAL PARK: Rancho Cucamonga County Br„nch Library August 12, 1986 The meeting was called to order by President, Norman Guith at 7000 p.m. Representatives of the County Regional Park Commission were introduced: Gene Gasponi, Chairman. and Erna Schuilling, Commissionerl County Regional Parks Staff members, Garry Newcome, Stevan Mossarli and Paul Burden; County Architectural Consulter', Joi Bonadiman. Members of the Friends were present as well as Rancho City Councilmembers, Jon Mikels, C.•.arles Buquat, and Pam Wright, and other interested persons. (Hopefully, wo will receive a copy of the lost of those present. Jerry Newcombe, Rugional Parks Director, reviewed the Regional Par,w operation over the last year: 1.87 Billion people visited the Co•:nty parka in 1985 -86 fiscal ynar. The parks offer a diverse •ecrastional opportunities to the public. The total parks budget is 41,400,000. It is a major financial problem for the County to operate these regional parks. The Board of Supervisors, with the recommendation of the then CAO, outlined the philosophy to be followad in the planning of Cucamonga- Ouasti Park. It was to provide a mixture of parks for recreational use that would enhance the poli*ical and social environment and that would be sensitive to the surrounding communities; that would '4 > u expand picnic areas, pathways, span play space and additional , 4 parking{ Th.s} would provide for amphitheaters, a water slide, ' soccer, tennis, softball, and a theme for a wine museum; that would provide cummercial uses, retail shops, a resturant, a recreation center, a hotel and convention center; that would provide the benefits of diversified recreational opportunitiesp that would expand open space and that would provide financial support for the operation of the parks "the main goal of the master plan." A presentation of the "preliminary" master plan for the :ucamonga- Guastl Regional Park was presented by Mr. Bonadiman. Ir. Rlgnoy, former CAO. defined gui-f-lines that C.G. was to bw sal' sufficient and that the land was to be planned to conform with the highest and beat use. Mr. Bonadiman illustrated the ilannad vxpannl�n of the park from the 20+ acres presently in use to an ultimate development of 150+ acres. He stated that a baseball diamonds have already been planned on the park and that a leases has already been found to develop Cpay for play: baseball. He mentioned an expansion of baseball diamonds to the north of that shown on his drawing. A restaurant is projected o0, the corner of Archibald and Fourth because of the "value of the corner arid its relation to Ontario Airport." The proposed hotel is not intended to compete with othar major hotels in the area. The proposed health club has a good leasee at present who .s co„- vincod it is a needed activity All the above (and more) will tro iyv d la:.rad by the r.ounty raid are rxl.cctM d to urovirlp A ornfit to the Cnunt•,. Thn plan is only midwav in thn nrorres,v of acceotanne. lrr . :.ors 1986 Future exr,ansjon O�trk a aeC l9 P. Arrs4 P3 A..rm• • r: rr o-.. f nr. 1 .4 11 P-21 !,I nn.roada ?.4 Pa rAtal 22.0 novelonad tno navntoa.cd C.. r♦ urbher i.rru+ntnd t,1n Altarnhtive plan for the park's .i �r.•tr,, ;,,lrnit whirl) nnrm•noratrd nxtnnalva lakns and oosn snaca•+ .J1^., the huildinn 6evr•looment dPvotk•d to a variety of enra..erclal .1s,4 al.d on arcllltACtul•al tha,aa throunhout. Ile offwred to ,.v •-r rnoiew of his ornon +al to those• who a,kv lie interested. N.>.hcl iltnrnative elan was nrovtdod by a n,ernnn intnrontad In ,•.c.rl I. e,dltl Anal rwr.rratinnhl uses or. tl.e bark, with or,en anarr. unv lxtl l.•tod ola•, and annrt,ii; areas. atom: n000r Wiilttas. trails. xr,e.. :, 1,otiodral oarrirn or lentrd tnwsrcis the uaos of native nlantn In private gardens. The meeting wad opened to questions from the audience. They covered the following subjects: Or As revenue generated from park leases operations will go to the County General Fund, how will the regional parks benefit in a trade -off for the loss of o)"pen space and traditional low co -c racreation7 As This is Erue, although soni parks have _ an "Enterprise Fund" which provides that money raised on any particular p.rlr will be retained for the duvalopment and operation of that park. 0: County funs may be subsidizing the parka, yat the people are paying for the parks through their taxes. The proposal for com- mercial development on the parks will operate in competition with private businesses which also pay taxes. A: The costs of the regional parks 1983 -86 rose to 44.4 million "hale revenue came to 41.9 million. This amounts to a subsidy of the Regional Parks b y the County of 41.9 million. The County parks operate at a rate of 67% ratio, vmich is still a better ratio than most other county park syrtems. In addition, the County does not own all this park land, but must buy the extended area from the controlling agencies. It is true that a ouggestion has been made to the Hoard of Super- visors that the name of this park be shortened to "Guasti Park ", although this is still open to objections. The fishing lake will continue to be stocked under any now plan. I golf course development has in explored. A special tax district to rains funding for development of the ,.ark is a poscibility. JqO P as Is there a possibility that the commerciali =ation of this parkland could make it grow into a future Knotty type facility? Ac This is not likely as the master plan will cover any land use and development over the next 20 year.% as The final recent approval of the softball complex shows C +t this expectation existed long before the ma%terplan concept developed. As A contract has boon approved already and it will be built by January 1967. A waterslide is in the making as a result of a $200,0g0 grant that must be used by next June or also be forfeited. A concern about the acceptance of "Pay for Play" policy in the plan was expressed. As many people cannot afford to pay, this limits their opportunity for recreation in a public park. Os Because of the approval of the baseball diamonds, was the land use of the park determined by the loasse? As The land use is not determined by any leases but by the Regional Parks Commission and the Board of Supervisors. Gs Hasn't a problem bean created in approving the baseball diamonds without concern for the open space of the park? As A legal contractual agreement is so difficult to change. The County has control of the land occupied by the baseball complex Os The flood control area leases for nine years at one dollar. In nine years the value rises and the law requires the land to be _old at market value. How is this to ow handled? Thw area south of Fourth Street was purchased by State Park Grant funds. The intent was to develop recreation and park lands. The speaker opposed commercial developments on park lands that compote with private venturea. of Did the approval of the baseball complex go through the required legal hearings? o developer remarked tnot, to him, the plan looked like a planned unit development without the houses. And what commercial venture would risk many dollars on a nine year lease? Why can't the Regional Parks buy the area from the Flood Control District? Thore followed a discussion critici zing the nocessity of public agencies using tax dollars to buy land from each other. 0s Is the commercial use compatable with the State Parks Grant funds? As Commercial uses have been approved by the State Park Depart- ment if revenue raised is returned to Cucamonga- Guasti Park. An "Enterprise Fund" would fulfill the-State requirements. .v The plan at this stage is- conceptual only. The costs of the other County ?arks, two wxamples: Prado is 136% self supporting and Moabi is 112 %, neither include administrative costs. Overall, the parks operate at 97 %. With administrative costs added, they operate at an average of 67% of self - sufficiency. O: The Flood Control land could Ykhave been acquired from 10 to SO cents per acre for public uses. Why now is the land being sold at a profit to that department? 0: The example of Glen Helen Park plan shows the County is trying to force commercialization on the parks. For the County to go into competition with private business Is wrong. Has an EIR boon submitted for the contract at Cucamonga - Guasti? A: One agency charges another is a practice that happens throughout the country (county?). 0: There is now many motels in the immediate vicinity. Will a leases want to face that competition? As If not, the plan will be rethought. 0: If changes in master plan are made, will those go through a public hearing? At The intention is that any changes will return to the full process. O: Have parking and traffic studies boon made? As Yam, and studies show the plan is sufficient for need. Os Isn't it late to make the baseball complex conform to d master plan for the park after a contract has been signed? As This area is sawn as a special use area. as What about the Chaffey Regional Park? Ia it on the County plan? It has been on the Rancho Cucamonga Master Plan. Comment: We lost Chaffoy Park to the gravel pit. Will we loose Cucamonga - Guasti to a hotel? Comment from Regional Park Staff member: Proposition 13 has shown that the taxpayers have stated a mandeto that they don't went to have tax increases for public services. Comment: We need trees. I object to requiring the parks to be self- sufficient. We are destroying parks to make them self- sufficient. As To add to a park is not to destroy it. Throughout the nation the traditior_1 park use is changing. Some areas have passed bond issues to support parks. Developers are required in the city to add many costly landscap- ing featu -es. This plan is nothing more than the amenities now required of developers in this city. As Development operates differently than public service parks. /Vo r- Of Comments Objection to use of Proposition 13 as an excuse to abandon traditional park concept of open space and free or low cost recreation. In the midst of the Depression, the voters of the East Day approved a bond issue to purchase what was the first regional park. That land has been preserved frr open space, and we must thank those people who taxed themselves to preserve it for us today. We have spoken of a bond issue to develop Cucamonga - Guasti. The Supervisors have activated this plan without giving us time -tv,look for alternative financing and in their rush to (exploit) this bare land, they are destroying our park. As This plan has not been adopted by the Staf°, by the Commis- sion or by the Supervisors Consultants We get the message that these people do not like the directive we were required to operate within. Commissioners expressed sympathy and explained that they do not alwcyo agree with the Supervisors. The Commissioners hope to meet with the Friends before public hearings. What is the plans if any, for an increase in water oriented ac- tivities as the population grows? The Chairman states that all the organizations contacted agreed unanimously to object to a Law and Justice Center being placed on Cucamonga - Guasti in 1980, and he reminds others that the Friends are still fairly reprssertative of public opinion in the arer. Comment: We are tired of subsidizing the County with our money. Can the park be developed without using commercialization and "pay for play "? Can the park be held for open *pssLY:if some "pay for play is allowed? As The Supervisors have stated that the parks %hail be self - sustaining. On this note, the meeting was adjourned. f �js .Items Animals as wait as other Wi!dlile protnde education for ehifdrert and aduhs of all ages. trio uses the take for fishing and boat. ing as well rte an aothedc setting. Prior to Marine World moving to this site, the Vallelo Recreation District leased the land to a golf course associa. tion. Through sane negotiations the cry corice8ed the lase and began its partnership with Marine World. Direc'.or Dick Conrelmann says. -This has added an exerting recreational element in the area an education alt went not without problems but it is exciting. This is a great example of public and prime recteation working together." Education facilities for the general public, as well as school groups are incorporated Into the overall design of the park The central theme behind all of the Dark's educational exhibits and facilities is "Man. An Animal." It locusts an the dilfermm and simillarl. tin between the envkoammral adapm• done of man and other annals. The Chevron Leammg Center is looted in the Agoanum and has amt of interest for all ago of children a well as adults. The mom illustrates adaptations— sensory, physical, and mite adapumons—tho. animals make for specific environments Educaponal materials include animal artifacm pappe s and masks. microscopes and complete envizaamerertol replicas. Cistercian shool groups and other special Interest programs can utilize the classroom facility with small animal displays. sudiavirual rename, co. a well a educational materials for a Adl tangs of age groups. The Gender Junes Games Interne, live participatory animal display grophica and play areas that invite children to take tomponroa between their own physical abaltla and those of anlmsls. The distance that a dger can lap and the height that a Estrella on jump two laid out nut to anes when children om try and mmpsa. Graphics explain why these aoimas he" had to develop these certain ebili• Educational flasks are located throughout the park that are designed to work as a staffed or unataffed exhibit Six panels contain question on dleplays. RunracclJtW materials are stored inside the klaek and on be,ed by park rdacadan 6wts for thool groups as well a the general po: a The parka mterpredve panels are the but ernmple of the pork's goal of Wis• interpret the exhibits and shows, trans forming passive observation Into active mental participation. The subjects nonce from why dicta love watt to haw dolphins can make their awn toys by blowing bubbles. Other programs uidade a behind the scenes tour. Summer Seafarer Day Camp. Self -0wdd Tours and s Crate Your Own Program. the School Astembly program and the specal select a sablect program Including the California Coastal Marine Mammals, Endangered Species. and Training Manna World's Animals. In addition to chase programs. Marine World Africa USA offers man educational opportm- ities in the farm of special evening events sad programs in conjunction with Bay Am colleges and gnatpe. Far coon information, contact Pat Fater- Tarley, Marine World's Educadon Director at f Vie 6444M New-`Fee ,. u Seheiiule Will Allot $59 ' Million More For National Park Service of both federal debt reduction and the nor increasing visitation to the national yadoti walk cost the avenge would aoat that h= for as round of tmsaw axes. race world befog to the each year in park Interpretation, Lenience and Raecbm main The new fee system proposed in S.M would gin the National Park Service the hording tlmblltty, needed to make awe that the parka are able to WOOL the heavy visitation loads tie m reaetY eaten" pay a reaexto, his fee to hemp protect and sustain them. The present fee schedule, despite the inflation of recmt unhapppy memory. has not been changed !or 14 yeers. with the highest foe being 30 for a fam• By park stay of one week. All 'he money now collected in entrance fen is deposited In the Land and Water Can. Upon enactment of the proposal advanced by this Adminlmauon and Introduced in the Senate as Sit. we at wojld 148 of � 6park w ct X1. SS oar 110 per vehicle. Eighty percent of the funds collected would be retained by the National Park Service to help fond park opeeradons. The remaining 20 per, o nt would go to help reduca the federal debt The new foe sebedule would be implemented on a parkky -park bees with a major amddeattm bring con- sistency with fees charged by State parka In we am. Many parks, spedR• tally thaw located In urban areas. would mocha to be Ora for all. Park users feis, such a Lhasa collected at gro oewould not be affected by this t d )1r '�+7.rahrtr:uett id 13 EM County's park plan Is bad for Ontario to bIM M ga on 23 low At mo Gaud Regmaa F,. %m Ontaev pen Qvctdr to ma Newcombe, dal am fcr our pesdaom park Lana ad °`'u �,a°m°woa:aAa mk " M k . r*aaaraat, ' MAN and a pro . At tbav an a Ssaranars by � a °'�,� by m r nfA►baomentam�I.�.r�.Ww bs med a davdW ftUd dttv= ar a *F C'dW ClelModgiGumd Re. the em•t b Imtlea G hr ym�t Wad 177 Acnes of ft ppoaL After pcouaV tboaMaal �.ar[fora apnea two the PaPa f and g to Faoth01 we amtred that the Aapevftoro .=a -,fold- the fotetmq of Pak for tradRlaaat ems. ,Now, has tithe proposed mas• 3dwWW for Augmt or bow +ppeov� by ft oardof y a o 3�e�rydaf ►amoz —are mw Alma pay fe mint be evfded to arm the moat Im� cl" oheerrer that tbee to park land pbumed vg M an Around Ontario, op the c0a with a WA cmvmtlm center, beslth dub, at 44ywf IM fymma�v remove tt tram ft octbAal It bar wks to�horld tbe= PeyWgo�mw LAW � re aria MMU fmdir^ Is ava0ahis7 Anyone aaxwvAd About MIA pro. .0 W,on at park Imb sboal waa mar swab' mpavlaor today. NORMAN a GUrfa July 18, 1986 Garry Newcombe Regional Parks Department 828 E. Third Street San Bernardino, California 92415 -0830 Dear Mr. Nevcorbai I recently had an opportunity to review your plans for the build out of the Cucamonga- Guasti Regional Park. I am cure it has been a painstaking process and do not wish to second guess the input YOU MAY already have received, but I have some questions. I. It would appear the emphasis of the development plan is to create a joint vsnture with private sector firms. I would aek if it is the proper raja of the public sac-torn to compete with the tundrels of acres of private sector land available for development of hotels and offices within a one to three mile radius of the par); site. 2. since the Cucamonga- Guasti Park is devignsd to meat the needs of an area approachin7 200,000 people which will axpvld to over 400,000 people, has the county dent a needs analysis study to.datarmine and who ssppecificallytthe the cilities %filllservr provide 3. It is more than likely that there is a major segment of the potential users of the Cucamonga- Guaistl Park who will be concerned about the cost of recreational facilities within the park. Are we precluding the use of the facilities by the vary people the park was designed to marvel 4. M.-,re is a limited amount of land available for recreation within San Bernardino County. This eighty acre facility is unique in the manse it is being developci in a highly urbaniaad setting. It spavan more important that we pronerve cur open space and maintain as rural an anviromama`, as is pcasible. Hotels and offices are not rural open apace uses. Again, this empasizea the need for a neadm analysis study. /W6/ Mr. Gerry. Mewcoabe, m ef Two, y-is, 1986 3. The concept of providing commercial uses to help defer the cost of park and recreation uses is one of merit, but comercial should be analyzed carefully to see that those recreation pros are program.. compatible with the park and In sw'u+ry. Z feel the inpact of this plan is axtresely critical to the overall park program for the county and that this Preliminary Proposal is in need of serious review in light of my preceding coamehts. C�ordial�ly, e� ft "su_/ JS/re CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY, Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPS OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION REYOKIiG mee ng to . n a enera n us r a s r c u area 3) located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APH: 209- 031 -74. I BACKGROUND: On August 6, 1986, the City Council continued this em ugust 20, 1986, at the request of the Foothill Fire District due to several minor pending fire safety issues. II. IUIPLYSIS: As of August 14, 1986, the fire alarm plans for the Foothill Fire FDistrict Na d have by fire safety requirement is an inspection of the fire alarm ;ystem and operation. The Fire District and staff reasonably anticipate installation and inspection to be complete by Tuesday, August 19, 1986. The applicant understands that the provisions of a Conditional Use Permit reflect that 'any proposed changes to the general activities pertaining to the use as described by the applicant In this application must be reviewed by the Planning Cosalsslon prior to those changes commencing' and any proposed changes to the floor plan of the facility as described by the applicant in this application must be reviewed by the Foothill Fire District prior to those changes caysencing. III RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the 0VPeT TO—F—C-0—nUltional Use Permit 84-14. However, if compliance has not been met, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolutlrn of Revocation thereby denying the appeal. Res Fc tfully submitted, Ae Brad Buller City Planner 88.DP:dak y� root hill Fire TLN P1i0`ll' Jl E`,(li'll m I®NT DgMICr P. 0. !OX 35. 6623 AMETHYST ST. • RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 (714) 987.2335 August 20, 1986 Dino Putrino City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline 1' Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 F, Dear Dino, On August 19, 1986 a final compliance inspection was conducted at the Veterans of Foreign Wars building. Wo found all areas of previous concern anti requirement to be in full compliance with our codes and ordinances. Tha building has roceived our f final approval for compliance. % Sincerely, A loy Almand Division Chief LBA /pjb 1. %! — RECEIVED -- CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLVINING OMSIOff i AUG 2 01986 718i019�llpZ1112i3�11518 ! 'E- L 4� CITY OF RANCH') CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 6, 1986 UL— TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING CO-41SSIOM DECISION REVOKING mee ag nal I in Me General industrIal is r c u area 3) located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APR: 209 -031 -74. I. BACKGROUND: On July 16, 1986, the City Council directed staff to Prepare 7aesolution of Revocation for Conditional Use Permit 84 -14 to be brought back to the Council at their next meeting for ccnsideratlon. II. ANALYSIS: Since the last Cityy Council meeting, staff had several mee ngs with the Foothill Fire District and the Veterans of Foreign Mars to clarify the fire safety issues. The result of our July 21st mee ng was a letter of agreEment signifying tha; all parties agree to resolve the pending issues within the times prescribed (see Fire District letter, July 21, 1986, attached). As of this report the Fire District and Veterans of Foreign Wars have made an extra effort toward resolving this matter. We anticipate that the matter will be resolved prior to the City Council hearing on August 6th. This includes approval of all subJect plans, installation and inspection of the fire safety system. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recaeoiends that the City Council approve the appea or on itional Use Permit 84 -14 if the VFW has completed Fire District requirement comrpliance. However, if compliance has not been met, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution of Revocation thereby denying the appeal. Res tfully submlttee (/ Brad Buller City Planner BB: ON ns Attachment: Fire District Letter Fire District Plan Check Report Resolution of Revocation / ya Fe�a hnfl IFim C PROTECTION DIS=C.T P. O. BOX 33 . 6677 A.MEIHYST ST . RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 A141 987.7535 July 31, 1986 Mr. Barnes, Capwi=a LM-WM~ Veterans of Foreign $Von Post 6680 8751 Industrial Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dew Mr. Barnes: This letter Is a statement of agreement to resolve the fire and life safety problems at the Veterans of Foreign Wars building. Your signature will signify yaw agreement to cooperate by meeting deadlines and other conditions as required by the Foothill Fire District. 1. Within ten days submit a scale floor plan for our permanent records of the tenant Impro •ements, with a&leways drawn upon the plan. 3, Within t.m days submit a letter stating there will never be any frying in the kitchen. Please note In the letter, this ban Includes portable appliances, such as electric skillets, as r -7 as the standard kitchen stove, or any fryers. 3. Within ten days Install the doc • In the south wall of the bar -os noted on approved plans. This door will have panic hardware and no other locking device. This door will have an approved exit sign over it. 9. Within 0doys resubmit the fire olorm plans for recheck to slaw correction of Items a and 5 on the consultants report. 5. Within ten days submit written certification from the fPe alarm company that they hove Instullea a 100 declble fire alarm system. This Is a temporary arrangement to allow enough time to do on audibility test on a band playing In the room. 6. Within 90 days conduct an audibility test to take 'worst-rose• test readings of the loudest bend that con be expected to perform there. 7. Within 30 days of the ouN.'bllity test, provide and Install upgraded olorm equipment. If necessary, as Indicated by audibility test results. ' It Veterans of Foreign Wan Post 8680 July 21, 1986 Page Two Compliance with these requiretrrnts will allow the veteran of Foreign Wars to continue operation on cn Interim bass. It will not negate other fire and life safety concerns which may be addressed by the Fire Marshal in the futt^e or on subsequent Inspections, The Veterans of Foreign Wors should be aware that them may be a requirement to ,�- Install automatic fire sprinklers In'their building to allow them to remain there Indefinitely as a public assembly In a non -rated building. As noted and agreed upon Gd��sda��t��e��, July 2��1,,� 1986. l%����,,aa Susan D. Wolfe, Inspec, -,, ��,L.tlsl_L.111 v Foothill Pre District bb st Mr. Barnes, Veterans of Brad BuXller Rancho (.uc, SDW/ss /yy " x r a1, t.• t I .t • �rnAO .1 �l)adAl ll 1=i PROTECTION DISTRICT PfAd cff= i nacre oCCUPMCT TrPB awtilm Tire MIARX TOOTAC[ Irmn 42 MRIM f waaa PLAN CHECK REPORT" PROJECT XAXEJI_I�__. A in�OC CONTACT PEATOX %Ua rt CC5 - rnun, TM rwrwnm itpumv Aim UMMO 1. ear . rim flw .lull a . auf®s _ ap. at a ainlr_Ca mp rEleaam 110 Ut"I f1 no, M. a deuraal"d to be .e3.,.�— rourts. x•�— IIIaT 87.203 entalrte.p�Orr d®lltlian t rUPM tenant l of l-C Tm Ordla.ne. no twidim, Tie fin daprtoat .Call u oetlfla Prior u CAC T.29, 31-29 onvpaeer of tM tollding(.) for alpmral of slam, tTP-s Pre lleealed t4 too Otat. mm IW.lal Prim ta 1a "woo. eapa hare.. oa...nn�t M aOtoOatic rite aprlotler amts.(.) t. n lred. Tlaaa UIC 1,.109 .Call be aotelttad to the nn dcPa tt tbr,ugb the baildlaa CAC T-24, a 2-10 deprbsat. for opproral Prior to i"ttUatlm. TTO drdinIOm no f ,ALL2e05a.i e = 10.109 S•ur a UTC lo. T. QKataea IXC 12.30 (of g.11l btt Pre UTAC T- TWO d CAC Yx1a 109.71007 2-1967 d 2- 1409 FM OfTAMST AM= 9 *9 a.nc. Thu "Ma,tic sprlatlae aT.tan emtrola .tall be eleatrmlr supervised. Thr'oo W" Of slag p1aCa and Mt sbaets a ta Mu ttad b W rim depart t. for approwl prim 1 ,.11.tim. Bbilding (a) .ball be awltoml 1—JI, rpm q"U. a the aprlsklm mta. Ao "Coati, rim ettlnaulallag Grata .1,11 b. lost, for t pmteetla a[ e„tlng a ..s. Mrt* sets or p .lull %I ebaittad to CA, fire dr artaaat for appreral r to lastallatlm. A, .,taati, it" ..unpllrhM mta, for prutectioe ta tbO the fdrp.rtaat for approval wl to faatalL� f•o� Apptorad rim lOdr.ots an r lma (are attached) C q.em plus lhwiz, both •alstlo[ W paopoaed data, bran," aball to aututtted to th" tin dmr•6iat for apps prim to b,lldlnt plan approval. TSm Wl ant batten I dotal vitl b ret,lret Prod amt tO porth.aad prior to I tugeetla. A rim aLn .Tate 1a rep,lr,d. lbrae eats or plaaa et .meta ,lull be "WSted to the rite depvbnt s"mral prim to lostall.tim. a"" fire a bIl lli aaben or all erqaneet. .ball be prarlded to tie dsPrtaent. Tim lama .111 ba required. gre stuebod staoduda acd /m mua m .kaeu I 5 Building tema, (.Pre doom) er toapend Blass pawl, tor rinftghtera elll be re"ImJ a rT 150 notal'fet Of .:Carla, NIU faeing eeeeas (i.e., roach . P"AC l,t..fl" Isaa. } ate.) Op"las -hall ba eery IW 11ata1 fat J.,lulldlap eoot.laty b1W piled stock. °- 1 i M ,1. IOpielfJ. )ILL fl102RTIW DIME 2 PALL 2 FLAN CHECK REPORT .--N' T 11 C±2 Pr41••7prm M%, Ammrrd @Ht alga vtll W r.a..lred. alp color shall emtrsal M V.0 vlb L1s lolls, vim letters not Is$. than 3/6• olds am 6• CM 1-24, 2-3312 high. 12.Rf4YltAad., Lrlt afgno .hall W IllpminaW at up tw the Uulldlng 1s UIC u.1T scrupled. light Intensity .sell W not !w, than aw fwteandld CAC T 2%, 2-)312 at floor lenl. 13.�p blt a1LO Illualmtlon 'tall b alectrlwly vtrwd m clrtulb �i apnW fros all others 1. eta WI1dlK, aimpt that wn Lay to each sign asp W vlrM frost a clrtult .Wpplylng Omar ootlKa. 14.N /A Gut alp lllalratlm .lull W elrtrlcally Wirld or eircults laC 12N�— smareb free all om•rs 1. tW h011dlrt, •umt that p loop atoll W electrically ,Jvgmr! floe atoms. Wtiorlea or an wblde pwrebr. I9.g711@q(aftt (n%(..e ^�-�� 61t Mya shall h lay . sA aryllw the Wilding 1. eee.plad. 1lpd't��112y 1111TT vim light leboaity of not lose pus aw fwtmdle at Roo CAC T-A, 2-3712 Lml. 16,NIG fait rmrfdoro vlll b retatr.d .rJ pall it ccr.a vcHl le CnU.10 swrlNn with the LtiIf -,s budding CWo. CAC 2s, 2.3301 I1 v, ltl /ll aed e.11lsa floleh mall goat et o D class Ii clean read rstlW, ld. to/A Tactical ..it corridor mile (etalrv*1s) " telling finish eC I- , ap able hZ-A stall rot Class I floes spread ratlosa 19. /r2f3:]]� eosin• ably W 8bb C ?ire fYnhsl ll.W sea sepproew.elaalK lC�oant Mm Wt doc- LtIbm, dsvlc•a shall W state sire fYrah" 11sW .. 25.1045 and aMr.,ed. sa deadhalu ar actor lorUV dories sm allows, CAC 1-24. p-M. es doors pulpprd Will pal. larfwn. 23316.2-3317.2 -3310 a, 3334 21 &CAl ( *MIMI &it drew tlLU .rtes 1. ch. dtmotlw of tram'. 7R` r33p3 ISS1-j77a 2l All ..it tear, 1. a ..it aael. " (status) dull b LUUUULKKKKC ]]]11222221111I664D999. Irtvbct.d ty a firs sAhly glaring a rim pmtortim rating t11000Ci LIIaM of wt you Ibis w, ham, or.ut•r prusl atiw ay W llagat red. 23. Mrssnef UnIsting doll b ].ably far all areas tW r_ air W lldlna, x u eolcd. a.. rho_. err_._ 1& a �. WC 12.113 M1 , Tonga Am All] oMIT MM vmncc t 24. NM psAt doctim savairstlK an east t 1 gor anal. flee vaL. Ili 12..i0 cull Wm inabliad an sppmo•aI fire dupr, lbw b }do CAC 1-24, 4306 ebb )Ire wnh 1. All choler, ohdL epee ly l ,l,d.ctr.f- rabostiw d vleas. toting afuWra abe! • M i pro"aW to W fin M.artant prix W 1pt u"Id.. Rds POW tGpR arcIAMS 79• IR _ games emts wfw c aa4 rawv.l a»as H31 W rpaiM. naw•715— 11"Cifltatt'" osu M rdatttr? W the fin d•patlt p1K W 76'u part s "ll W mdulroo w tWri W nmetaadfsd W runes sls axxdamo with the W+rom wulw I.l._ 4' r , ` tOOIilI1L y1M :'NOTLTiN DILT91 ras— PLAN CHECK REPORT, D41TATITT IN76IAL AgD/0 3T13D® 27.B1W.'orcu Alp drape. ha^,j". curtain or drop and /or other deeo.tl UM 2'v.103 aterl.l shall be Class raterdat tfatad, s. tppm CM T-24. I.Cd the fire departarat. A letter .pacihens the and" In seed then b suoattte.l b the f1n deparmant for appro, yrlor to treabmt. 26 & ra Ioter3or Tau finish Llwl, at as. III rsae ';rat xtleg. Tn lrT 29 f2ace,.,. a. M fl,%abla floor rmariry shall east alnlar r1cm Clef Arpandll lI-A mrylrwente In Table IV-A. of the Udfo. rtra Code. lout WACITnn AtD/011 VACUATI011 PA0Cm1lyD 30. .,jv ,WV gas rapacity .ball be posted "M a sign haring lasts. e 225.114 mob. J� Man, W ahall contrast t•th the mil color. Be CM T-2b. 3'.O1 sign shall be Dated at a location apprersd by the fl departDCnt. I�P6T17g IOCATIM MIO) MAIIMM �_ ty iyq`3�!9p�z' {R�t�f1ltP� �Yf�Jtlpd� 71 Re.4 A Mention ymcwGn.a .ball be relieved Led appro,M by 1 CAC 9•2A. 1.17. 1.09 lira deperfant. These procedures shall be gated at a 1oat1 .pplo .d by the rtm dri resat. 1II RnMT= 32. QPm.� tra or ear. ke7 bs. /derlea. eIII be required an? ah.0 U, 10.209 psrtdaaad prim to fine, plan apyrnsal. 1111111110 MWITfIreTlfl 13. 1k The btlAing aed /m tenet add..a *hell b posted at 30. mesEIMM, laatioe, elth mabe. and/or letters letters a ato of I high, In a contrasting color to the background. 31 A directory shall be gated at the sin .tram(.) to 1 30. p.Nnt. The dtrwtory, shell be Itghted Ad etesrlr I.gtl _ frca ..atfaa dt.tana of 20 fast ftaa the stems rosin The directory shall Inelde. but not be IleltM tot Ioatl of all btldlnp (mach .ball be Idatiflsd alpbsbettc.11 onartrally). secs.s drl,avays ad rim hfdrsote. A detail specification of the Alraet.y .ball be submitted to the rl depertaent for eppronl prior to Installation. 1II 11111111117 lei — WGI.tr.L�-.r9�-1- D9 35. Qe= t tv, retalt, re7 IM. Cuylste ad mtur, oselcaed appllesti, [] sedate aelased Omer•s 8tatawnt of letaal" use. O Complate melaed g.nrd ens 11tterlal. IMmatlun fa.. bl8t � 16 j)p31_ 1 rim departaeet plan cheek tat, u noted balsas. jjjl! * Urethan" IM V.tns. Rld b foothill fire DA.Wet Prior to approval of plans 77D Ministate 110 IM Ann V. s P i /r err _ • FLO 71,1, ME rM�=MO2 Cants' s 01 Ah6 r+LI1 art! h�Mranv Fzxt 7- A..PA6Y %.oa i Lee VII% r7 L.TV Il lei 77. 11M - fA)O,ued? A fee, as notes aloe, v U a cMraH tar r•.y.lred Mc I a Pi1�8mt.ce #ICS en3 eMU be ralA 4 rootAlll Tire Olrtrl •t l+1er N t lvpetlan, ualree otanlee notal. rtd rlxlr,r s s s a, �m iP-- a flrel e/4 ylu. TAs scale a eat th 79 31" e/4 yleA eMll a clearly igltw ra e. V . I n cra ea BY S 11' W null evi4ln Ilne tootytln4, cullA ,f.t 1E<nt3flwtlon. emu 0rlrevye eM fln htAwnt lee•ttoee. 19- I?/.ammd+ Wtelt to fol3MOe ylatul QAll Wee4 Q 4A--Via; M rlre Wrdra,%/Vater Ii Q Grath` ED Arrictlet ni 136 rlre A ¢rr4a fZ) W1,elor Alva Manl4rlc{ ere4a O Q ADUI= .�. P—LA 141f� A.rnn,..,.. bur 'W � �L•}Li f•on.1...e nAv •• - pi+�" .Q.gIC[.41Lt {r'}✓+ �p /d ��nn{ ry, .[fm4 r. %II R (b,m[prJN..i IM.� in rrw •,. /kII AOA .�• OSrerri .7`? t. Lr•n ar ..1.' ., Jl... ' -a (In. 4 F..... O rl i L6� nab ie �/��nt._u el •�RAA, kn. Wt•e rtr �r {x1A MA• ? ntin MwL b3jd Tr I kill it Swim 91111 SLIMI .1 b•Cr M S .t 11 () Aerlewr'e elputure�( /llMn \Il. � — e,Cflil p q=MQr9 ®AAOISO ALT W M lSCO ® IIRItL a VD = 7D m 1fJ77�L RRi CItSRIY Ri7r7 WV3 ArnMos. AO W= AWM Me,. WASlulc,fM rLt" lter W Ap W APC Rtvwm R lU Flu DCMNDM RESOLUTION NO, A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -14, A PERMIT TO ALLOW A MEETING HALL SERVING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) AND LOCATED AT 8751 INDUSTRIAL LANE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A Recitals (i) On August 8, 1984, after a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission of the C_ .y of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. 84 -76, thereby conditionally approving Conditional Use permit No. 84 -14. Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -14 allowed the applicant, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, to conduct the use as described above in the title of this Resolu- tion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit is referred to as °the CUP." (ii) Condition No. 2 of Section 2 of said Resolution No. 84 -76 provided as follows: "Prior to the use of the building or business being commenced thereon, the existing building shall be made to comply with current Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal Regulations. The applicant shall contact the laity -s Building and Safety Division and Foothill Fire District to di3cuss these require- ments. Planning Commission revi -w twelve (12) months fron• this approval." (iii) On October 9, 1985, the Planning Commission con - ducted said twelve month review of the CUP to determine whether the use was operated consistent with the condition. of approval of said Resolution No. 84 -76 At said meeting it wau deter- mined that the applicant had not met the requirements of the Foothill Fire District and grantea the applicant ninety (90) days to comply with such requirements of tho Fire District. (iv) On March 26, 1986, the Planning Commission again raviewed the CUP to dotermine compliance with the conditions of Resolution No. 84 -76. Upon ev:donca of the continued failure to meet the conditioned fire safety standards, the Planning Commission rot the date of April 23, 1986 as the date to con- duct a public hearing to consider the revocation of the CUP. :;i : . -I- 1q9 RESOLUTION NO Page 2 (v) On April 23, 1986, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the revocation and za.d public hearing was continued to the regular meeting of May 14, 1986. At the continued hearing of May 14, 1986, the ^lanning Commis- sion took testimony and received evidence that the applicant had not complied with the condition of Resolution No. 84 -76 requiring compliance with fire safety standards and, at the conclusion of sa1A public hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 86 -52, thereby revoking Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -14. (vi) The revocation as set forth in said Resolution No 66 -52 was timely appealed to thin Council. (vii) On July 16, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with regard to the subject revocation and such public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of thie Resolution. (viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, dete - -fined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho .monga as followai 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts sot forth in the Recitals, Part A, of Luis Resolu- tion are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the ebove- raferanced July 16, 1986 hearing, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above - referenced Planning Commission meetings, the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 66 -52 and the written and oral testimony of members of the Foothill Fire District, this Council specifically finds as follows: a. The CUP applies to property within the w, General Industrial District (Subarea 3) and is located at 8'51 Industrial Lane; b. The CUP was approved to allow the maintenance and operation of a public assembly hall carving alvoholic beverages within a portion of an existing building. Such a use conforms to the development standards of the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in a permitted use within the General Industrial District when authorized by a Conditional Use Parmiti -2- 150 RESOLUTION NO. Page 3 c. Evidence generated during the above - referenced Planning Comvission meetings and public hearing of this Council reveals that the applicant has, for almost two years, failed to fulfill a basic condition of the CUP specifically generated to protect the health, welfare and safety of those persons and properties on the immediate site and adjacent areas. More specifically, the applicant has failed to fulfill Condition No. 2 of section 2 of Resolution No. 84 -76 requiring that the building and activities conducted thereon comply with current fire safety standards. Based upon the evidence produced at the July 16 1986 public hearing, the applicant has not fulfWed these fire safety requirements, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The failure to submit and receive approval for a fire alarm systrm plan for the building; ' (11) The failure to install and test, under actual conditions, an approved fire alarm system; (iii) The failure to install required fire safety devices within the building, including panic hardware for the exits and fire extinguibhora; (iv) The failure to submit a declaration that the existing kitchen facilities will not be used in any manner ccntrary to the existing fire safety standards of the building; and (v) The failure to submit a floor plan of the building describing interior improvements which meet fire safety standards. 3. Based on the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referancod July 16, 19PG public hearing and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2, above, this Council hereby finds and con- cludes as follows: a. Thu operation of the use authorized by the CUP does not conform with the conditions of approval as stated to Resolution No. 84 -761 b. The use being conducted on the subject site is inconsistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with regard to compliance with fire safety requirements; and C. The evidence presented to this Council has Identified substantial potential adverse effects of the con- • tinu2d operation of the use on the subject site by exposing ` members of the public on the subject site and in the immediate r C. vicinity to fire hazards. -3- RESOLUTION NO. Page 4 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby revokes Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -14. S. This Council hereby provides notice to Mr. MATT HOGUE, Poet Commander, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 8680, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094 6. 6 The City Clerk is hereby directed to (a) certify to the adoption of Chia Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of tl,n Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to Mr. HATT HOGUE at the address aq reflected '( ii City records. 1986. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , Mayor I, BEVERLY A AUTHELET, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolu- tion was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonge hold on the day of _, 1986, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the G ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1986, by the following vote: "- AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: t'- ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga C h:r -4- V DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: ^T ^n G A T.TrVn rT Ir A MnMPA STAFF REPORT August 20, 1986 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Rubin Yu, Associate Planner 19 25 -86 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE RE,'JRT ' I ABSTRACT: In accordance with the requirements of the United States epar m5—ect of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), for Community Davelopment Block Grant recipients, staff and the consultant, Cotton /Beland /Associates, have prepared a Grantee Performance Report (GPR) for the 1985 -85 Community Development Block Grant Program. Staff recommends approval of the report as required by federal regulation 1. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the annual GPR is for the City and HUD o ova ua a the usn of Block Grant funds and the status of programs for which funds were allocated. During fiscal year 1985 -86, expenditures for Block Grant projects showed significant progress. Housing rehabilitation loans and grants were issued to an increasing number of homeowners during the fiscal year. Construction was begun an both North Town Streets Phase IV (Acacia /Belmont) and the west side of Turner Avenue. The Grantee Performance Report indicates that the required benefit to low and moderate income level residents has been attained and the goal of fair housing furthered. 1II. PUBLIC REVIEW: The required public review period expired on Augur —I5; I98S: No comments were received. IV. REC01%4ENDATIOH: Staff recommends that the 1985 -86 Community Dove opme�n BTbck Grant Performance Report be approved and the report and Resolction of Approval submitted to the United States Housing and Urban Development Department prior to August 31, 1986. Res fully ra r t City Planner BB:RY:dak Attachments .c ,i RESOLUTION NO. i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 1983 -86 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN SAME AND TRANSMIT IT TO HUD WHEREAS, In 1983 -86 the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, conduced a Community Development Block Grant Program and WHEREAS, the 1983 -86 Community Development Block Grant Program has been discharged according to Federal requirements; and WHEREAS, tGe preparation of a Grantee Performance Report evaluating the programs Is required by federal regulations; and WHEREAS, the Grantee Performance Report It required to be approved by the City Council prior to submittal to the United States Housing i and Urban Development Department. NOW, THEREFORE, Be IT RESOLVED, that the report Is hzreby accepted and the Mayor is authorized to sign and submit the 1983 -86 Grantee Performance Report to the United States Housing and Urban Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1986, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King, Mayor AT TEST: Deverly A. Authelet, City Cler M t y.a��r�il,• tii:3. °- .ray, �.. •.,'1S' 9�� ,i .f Grantee Performance Report Ypl GNI hq.. cY3 Ys aa.een 9770 3w. Ll. b.d ^ - U.,M 41Nm°s "r a 9MO (714;-9-39-1861 ` a nW 1mD9rl e01.1K.01 W i.vwm9 iarN. 6YU.m0 9N9N.Y 6CNY.0 TYYrpY l D-- 9fl6 • Wrv.Y IMY - /MIYY /M YNIP.NIM i IINN 9.Ti1lYl. W.N rN.V NN L4 l 4.K. Y IY.T.� /M Y{MINI h 4 eHK MvY Mme.. FV•T.NI K 1 M3VIYYNIYYN.Or /YPN IN IMrYN fMVDINIK 0 o+rN.r.Y wwN. n y. xu9 NNS. Nr9) w[-rw.�I o•vY.I/rY�' aYM "Y`°°" "rY'YY.'•a.wn Yr on9 TN. RIrM wN CONWC O.z. drr IGTNY.Imm aY.MM..r A.OYN. N I. rwWwW N IM s N CsweNY bYYP.N •awa,.rwn.Y r.b. hewaYON +WNF.c 0 it a a YNN.1 gyNaN wNY w w�. N w �N9 �� � NN.�N•w� �.w�r. M^� wwYV. YNN.MY a w. MnYS OeMN[.�r4 naNr. PN.wMO�W WY.. b b urOMNrr N M Yr NmY+N.len M.Y N W M1Y> [..r NeN.TA YWra NN. MYrN IRPr O.m�r. 11 Pr WYr N W Yrw41w N•NNr Y M pMN•. M.° NNYI'•[ W a... s. Y.w...N: ww.r NWY. N. bM a a Ya..•...W t . WMN M NNNN. rKNwI !I W yNY.. M it P.Orn YYn [aw Y b /iw.INbl. a TM dNMN'..,Y.MwN oIIIC W p.p.Nwrlw GNN. rw[ • iM INNI rM. N OwN YwIR.O M ONn 0 W l.Yw. ♦ T.M MNN Nr.rNNW. 1MNMY.Y W wON14.M NY b•.NUNMOY.Y IIAt c rNYN nNN.a+INN Yrwrr we. YY cYe.rwr ew.{tOw. am Or.N CDaa1 /rWY. w wr I.n.4Y.M m nYY..puwNr s. r.r. N fear n.,raN u�M Y..v...n wwYY.. +NY.o.. aY. w YrN r..c� wievl � yV m W MYI N d nY(l rrNlp/ [vsM11N R1..INr r •r Y.YNN•MII�ININTW IIYMYNb. [bin [�.IGYKN �wJ� .�N�NM� ww.[.�• NrISIY�Nr.YNr Y.Y M. Y�sY..NNr M•'YNNY� .1 ..N[Y 1M I. TI.r4NY•.IM NY[R Y.WrY..r� N[�. `F. "t• YN.� IWY.6w11rr.I1N IW YI�rrK Nr.N..NYr /. YW.I4W YYrrYNN.. �.Ir Y�r.Y..fM 3 - Ll{Tq 37at. eal0i • .n 0+1 ' {'1'r,, {Y T. ]S INr4N INM. CMYNI ' N M M W 6 M sw • ,a a CRM?TEE PERFORMANCE REPOPT No. 7 a. Assesrmeat of Use of Commucity Development Block Great Funds in Relationship to City and National Community Development Objectives The 1985 -86 Ca>nnuity Development Block Grant Program coamitcad the City of Rancho Cucamonga to completion of two projects, initiation of Due (1) new project, and one (1) ongoing program. In order to support these projects and -rograms, the majority of funds received care budgeted to them. North Tow Street Improvements • Turner Avenue West side North Tow is a CDDG target area because over half of its households are law and moderate income. By repairing and upgrading public improvements in the area, and offering low interact loans and grants, the City hopes to ancouragn private investment in the area and ensure all residents a safe and pleasant living environment. This project is a carry over frog 1984 -85. It involves the �econstructioa of 'he vest side of Turner Avenue north of the railroad tracks to add curb#, gutters, and sidewalks. Design and engineering of the project took longer than expected, so the project was nor completed until July 1986. North Town Street Improvements - Phase IV (Acacia, Belmont) Another area of North Town that needed strent improvements vao Cottage, Belmont, Acacia and Eighth Street. Funds were programmed and spent f,r the design and engineering of the work in 1984 -85. Construction was funded in 1985 -86. Duo to unanticipated soils problems, constriction took longer than expected. The work is now scheduled to be completed in August, 1986. 'Chia project meets the federal goal of benefitting low and moderate income households and the City's goal of upgrading public improvements in such areas. North Tow Park Residents of the North Tow area have asked the City to provlba them With a neighborhood park. Since Cho development of such a park .Lll take more than a year, this project is r multi -year project. Funds vnre allocated for site acquisition in 1984 -85 and for park development to 19P,5 -86. Only one site was identified as acceptable for a park and ongotiariooe to acquire the site were delayed due to the death of toe owner. Acquisition and development are now expected in 1986 -87. This project also meets the .ederal goal of henefitting low and moderate facome neighborhoods. Housing Rehabilitation In 1982 -87 the City established an ongoing, multi -year Housing Rehabilitation Loan program and a Senior Citizen /Diecbled Parsons Repair Grant Program. 'the Housing Rehabilitation Loans Program offers below market rata loans (with interest written down by the City) to low and moderate income homeowners for ■ maximum teem of fifteen (15) yisrs. Tho Senior Citizen /Dioabled Persons Repair Grant Program offers a non - repayable grant of up to 81,500 to individuals or families that meet eligibility and income requirements. During the past year the rehabititaeion loan program has been more successful than in previous years. The City has, through its program subcontractor (County of Ben Bernardino Office of Community Development) processed a number of applications, and Corse home rohabilitation loano were funded. The g -pair Grant program has also improved its partiepation rate (forty -five (45) grants as opposed to thirty -nine (39) is 1984 -85). This improved achievement is largely due to increased ou:r,ach and publicity on the part of City staff. Senior Shared Housing The Inland Mediation Board, vhich operates fair housing services and landlord /tenant counseling services for the City, hat astablished a new program o`_ assisting senicr citizens who want to continue to live independently but cannot live alone to find roomatcs among other active sonio -s. The City reprogrammed $5,000 in contingency funds to contribute to the start of this program. The program vas operational in the summer of 1965, and all funds were spent. Seventeen (17) seniors were counseled but no roomate matches ware made. 88E of these ware lover income. This program meets the City's goal of providing a decent home in a suitable living environment for all residents. Administrative Costs In 1984 -85, the City budgeted approxiewtcly 17 ye percent of its entitlement evard for various allowable administrative costa, including lair Housing Services. Again thin year, administrative costs were hold bola- budget. Handicap Signs The City of Bench Cucamonga has several older shopping centers vh Lch do not have signs identifying handicap parking ep=ees and citing the municipal code sections which reserve them for the vehicles of disabled custamere. As a result, enforcement is difficult. The City set aside funds to provide the necusary signs, but legal problems delayed program start -up. Funds are expected to be expended in 1985 -86. No. 7 b. The City has not changed its program objectives for 1985 -86 and would net change them as a result of its experi - aces The objectives for the 1985 -s4 program (a• contained in the Final Statement Of Community Objectives) verwc I. To eliminate and p..veat alum nod blight and conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare while praserving the housing stock for people of low and eodernte income. I1. To provide information and affirmative supporr for the Fair Housing Java of the State and Federal governments, in support of the goal -f ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment. rie 15-7 s f III. To provide neighborbood parks and recreation facilities in low and moderate income noigbbo - hoods in order to support rahabilitation of , those &redo and to order to met the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities will improve the living eav'•runmont in the surroeneiog low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national prioritiaa. 1V. To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide atreet improvements in areas targeted for houaiag rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements is being given to areas whose residence are predominantly low and moderate income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus improving the living environment. No. I C. No comments were received from the public on may part of the CDbC program during the pas: year. Yf• 3 Pik h +q - i • • /SS 1 | I . \ \ / | |j i \�j \ \\\ | �7.�.,. . ... . ... 3 � �§ | � • /� � (| \� � �f � &•)� /! b , §. ;: .. ; /gG5! ..... ..�. ; � • |' �] ; §� §; w• z . Z5f z 2 � k � ! Grantee Perform>nee Report GM�� �.[� ;±' L 4 TWI CON /WI GIMM 9AY YY [ tlwY lfwl N[aw iraxY tIINY a IYn61 ILtt 1 In6 a W JY.n w L[mIN tY.wr rov, [[a.aY p au xa xnmrrma xd rl L YY GYMMI[ I.db[I Y r[N W ONMI CJ[WOw IM T. G[wY�wu LwIMW Iw W YCOMtlI WgYIbwM1 W xY.. Y lwNa L..IYI YNruN[t Iw N. [YYY p LON Iw[ i W )u9NxWNWN (MrYY[Ne I WYW[CDw /xtlIxWNRYM1YLUJiW alry f . Y9Y.6 L YlIwY Wd nIY[ b[YM K a cw.w xY GYYYY[I tM1Y[ a ncpw Mtb CaL✓YM+ 677.0 r . LYLY.Y aw K R t Bxl9rctLwLA IW Imu[IU[[NtlM19Y 0 s M.W[IYYUW a.. «xmwaxw.W paNKtL W IR1 p .. lew axwlW 6TL1 {KAM la t 1 t M1li.lbWIWxYYDM9M1 IYFW Yw.txrylMMY91W WSY t e 1 1 I. IwJW IW hqM W ti![Y4y 6.I.q w fl[!'w Yw fwb. w IY. UaY aaw. rporlYw w MIIw YRM M [{ fiYw 6 G NIY.tl6W /J.Y • TYJ MIIL+W W W IJY[ N[YM IwINMY Gd > Tool CDN IwY LYYx[[ bl W. OwY 1NI IYawW IYbY bY.YYYI I W 11 [ � L Ww rw[ Wa.Y[t DY[YTIq lNaYd Mltd b[ Mn.w YA[YV) fuwrl F[rM mW tl > W.I[atl GAY. N WN Iwo Y W tl IYY MpwM9 f VYI IY19 YYw W 9 Iw! wxr rww. tr Y [w [y YW W Ww Nlw )� 0 t t X5.0 t 96).L Y •15.5 t u5.1 t 555.5 t 45.6 i t 595.9 9 }9).9� IW b t , µ . Map W W..L 6 Owp TW LIIw"h L 4 TWI CON /WI GIMM 9AY YY [ tlwY • WcYw[Yp wnrv..tyYNIN9w(bb W JY.n w L[mIN tY.wr rov, [[a.aY p L YY GYMMI[ I.db[I Y r[N W ONMI CJ[WOw FY M Y+r[ W Yi G[wY�wu LwIMW Iw W YCOMtlI WgYIbwM1 W xY.. Y lwNa L..IYI YNruN[t Iw N. [YYY p L 1KMY 4NN b b. W Y.yY. M[vY Mqv W )u9NxWNWN LIYYw1 Y9p CMM Y4�OL[xM �r05 -l6 M�� tY�� f (q IIMYa tNxL 1[r YWYYw q+OLUwu bM91I. YYr Y ME[xwl MA IxMw YeI IIM 4 K a cw.w xY GYYYY[I tM1Y[ a ncpw Mtb CaL✓YM+ L CwYYw GpWY[[ Mn[{Ny {w WYaYx[ WviY MW K R a {yr[W UIYY[w. WY A 10. W YKxw W Yw Pnew �„ IW Imu[IU[[NtlM19Y )� 0 t t X5.0 t 96).L Y •15.5 t u5.1 t 555.5 t 45.6 i t 595.9 9 }9).9� IW b t , µ . Map s, rs Grantee Performance Report •++„+p„•r ' Iawvl Loop w.Gww it auP w ndaan m. mt+R Clb of l.eero 4,�aaron a-d •RC -o6 -0 " 1 1 e " 6/JO 06 P.n G OY.c. l.p. dNw.. far q+Aee+�ad c:oo G+n a R.Nbw.U, W Pre .r W NwWnd .•r '� .cwt nrr ... `.-^� f ' 10at na1� E�ut1a1 r +NGllltd:foR n Lw /m G.ME1 p M Y qwl tYrW. e.rl It c W o e.IYVU1w.. U..d b inn ,d a..w.d lo R.Wa In U. RcgW.Rba, Cdrtuvcu.. w R W.Utn a prep," Aw rwRro .tal. • +�'• at ,N••M rww Why.w aYlM • r. rr • not +pplltaeb y IN% ...IdrotLl r.kabllttsti- v. tw /r e+e.tf I �Y J '� • -PbT MY M W O•.Y•. t.rl. : •`! T.W C•p.adl... 1W P.pYdrq P.bd t. M g1Yr Rn,e..OwpryNp d.IwAYI MnNP 0.4 M TO" -" e.wu I'm I,. U.nd VIf Nvp.aarn+R� .. . Hoipwt�e,a.0 {�; _ r�'pi!" 4r• 'yS• qu •w'#:! i "PFyli;��: tl {- , \� \' t� � \ , e. ,i �L « # k t , |j �]� $ )/ | � 7r | , | . |§ � , ■| � | § q � ƒ § | | || | .�(. .� I | A� d | � � . .F` N , e. ,i �L « # k t , |j !! 3 3,; a a 2 2 e e § - -- § ')} | |l , , 0 0 0 0 0 0 - �•� ; I` ; A, 0 fill . 2 2 ; ; gi, § ; ; ■ ■ gill lit �� � � • \ � � •! \ � � ' � / / \ \ % � { ) ] | | . !\ | $ |! !II|| . ; !}!� /! § ql h|� k�lf ]] § Q §. | §' -a|| ;. -.. 2!�!§ , ! ; i G� "�.;, � "�• jajrr:; t a ! 1� 5 RESOLUTION ND. Q/ - X/ IRI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 1985 -86 COMMINITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRMi GRANTEE PE.°- r.;kWCE REWIRT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN SAME AND TRANSMIT IT TO HUG WI :Commu in 1985 -8G the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califmata, conducted a Coaraunity Development Bluck Grant Program and WHEREAS, the 1985 -86 Community Development Block Grant Program has been discharged according to Federal reVulrments; and WHEREAS, the preparation of a Grantee Performance Report evaluating the programs is required by federal regulatlona; and WHEREAS, the Grantee Performance Report is requtrae to be approved by the City Council prior to submUtttal to the United States housing and Urban Development Department. and the Mayor 13 THEREFORE, utrized toTsignOandOsubmit t the 1report is hereby accepted Report to the United States Housing and Urban Development Department. . *' •�•�� i AFFIDAVIT I PI.I /LICGTipN 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA ° OOUMYOF SAN HERNARDINO � ss RI Linda Parisian .daberepyctrWythgtl am the Legal AdvertLOW clerk of THE DAILY REPORT, a dally Omtyty 2W Sst aforeuld and tint U=aatteebed advefrus went f :r :tice of Public Roaring Rancho Cucamonga City Council 1• � was publhhed In mld nowapaper one ( 1')' time August 8, 1986 v' �I try under penalty of perjury that the forsgolny Ls true and is ,3lgnaturo) Dated at Ontart, California this a cloy of August 1986 f 4 ' I , ,4. � / y 1�, s, :t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Rubin Yu, Associate Planner PROGRAMMING OF !DDITIONAL 1986/87 CDBG FUNDING FOR THE I. ABSTRACT: Staff hes been informed that the Cit will receive T69;ODD —+•• additional Community Developw.mt Block Grano (COBG) funding for the 1986 -87 program year. As a result, staff recommends that $6,000 be allocated to the Senior Shaved Housing Project operated by the Toland Mediation Board. This protect was considered in the hearing to allocate 1986 -07 CDBG funds, but was not funded due to the expected reduction in the 1986 -87 allocation. II. BACKGROUND: In April, 1986, when the City Council was considering TITF-FTn—a77Statement of Community Objectivts and the projects to be funded with 1986 -87 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG; funds, the allocation to the City was expected to be $340,000. However, Congress passed legislation in June, 1986, which will result in an increase of $64,000 for the 1906 -87 program year or a total of $409,000. The Projects which the City considered but did not fund, and the amount of funding requested for each, are: Project Amount Senior Sha, �d Housing S 6,000 SW Cucamongd Street Improvements $295,000 Arrow Route Improvements $200,000 SW Cucamonga Park Acquisition $300,000 Only the Senior Shared Housing Program can be funned with the additional allocation. This program matches peoplr, who want to find rooamates with senior citizens in need of housing. As a result, the seniors are able to continue to lice independently instead of needing institutional care. The progrum is operated by the Inland Mediation Board and serves several cities in the Hest Valley. Last year the City contributed $5,07) to Senior Shared Housing. . J, ) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT August 20, 1986 1986/87 COOG Additional Funding Page 2 staff's recommendation on the programming of tha remainder of the subject funds (,63.000) will be submitted to the City Council for consideration shortly. III. PUBLIC Y1 A notice this 1sed funding published n tTayP OAugust 8, 9G6.Noco nents hav been rece ve IV. RECOWENOATION: Staff recommends that $6.000 be allocatxd to the 54—nTo—r—sFa—r—euTousing program from the additional 1986 -07 funds. Res fully §l+ba ted r Brad Buller City Planner BB:RY:dak Y } 'l ' P, 4 l RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWGA, CALIFORNIA PROGRAMMING $6000 OF ADDITIONAL 1986 -87 COMMUNITY OEVEI.OPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR THE SENIOR SHARED HOSUING PROJECT. WHEREAS, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has applied to conduct a Comm-nity Development Black Grant program for Fiscal Year 1986 -87; and, WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and 'Urban Development h ^.s informed the City of Rancho Cucamonga that they will receive an additional $69,000 for Fiscal Year 1936 -87; and, WHEREAS, Inland Mediation Board operat:m a �nior Shared Housing Program which serves Rancho Cucaav JA residents; and, ? WHEREAS, Inland Mediation. Board has requested an allocation of $6000 for Fiscal Year 1986.87 for the Senior Shared Housing Program; and, WHEREAS, the Ciwy Council hold a duly noticed public hearing and accepted testimony frw interested parties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby allocates $6000 'nom the 1986 -87 Cammunity Development Block Grant for the Senior Shared Housing Program operated by Inland Mediation Board, and directs staff to inform the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of the same. Y' 1 erg .i:A =t J,70 1 .. i ;} ESTATE OF CALIFORNIA 'COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO as �I Linda Parisian , do hereby certify that I rn the Legal Advertising clerk of THE DAILY REPORT, a daily mowspaper of general chculatfoe, ppubllghad in the City of Outarlo, County and State aforesaid and tbr• the attached advertisement of Hutica of Public Hearing Rancho Cucamonga City Council �' "was published In gild newstwyer one (1) timo i ,towit:August 8, 1986 1 I certify under penalty of perjury that the fongcing is true and correct. (Signature) Dated at Ontario, California this 8 day of August 86 C t � ■1 Al -.1 I _ r :6 n e NEW ._ - -- UL'1'YCC,,UI ,yIt7�ANU11Ugq�0700AMUNUA rvo,"tin_ DATE: August 20, 1906 'TO: Mayor and Members'of the Ciitty Council � FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner() �OC/ BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner• SUBJECT: SIPR007 =M OF COT0 --UEE- USE AS1OE FOR, NORTBA TOWN PARK 9EVEC0fF1E ., Staff is requesting a continuance of this item to the September 3, 1986 City Council meeting. This item will be presented in conjunction with the Ilorthtown Park Acquisition Agreement which has been continued to that date to enable finalization of the agreements with the property owners Brad Buller City Planner BB:RY:dek Q Y i t 'G: 9 y � =a 1� S .. i�Y •p s A .hs..- w...,•...s - `A►f IDA V IT Of PUWCATION 'STiTE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTYOFSANBERNARDINO as -Linda Parisien ,doh`e'eby certify that I am the Legal Advertising clerk of THF, DAILY REPORT, a dally +>t"Mer of general circulation, ibWhed to Ube City of ontarlo, Couoty and State aforesaid and that the attached advertisement Notice of Public Rearing dancho Cucamonga City Council Fag published ln said newspaper One (1) time tow(t.Aagust 8, 1986 a Ic certiif fy under Penalty of Per)ury tbat the foregoing to true and �t. (Signature) Dated at Ontario, C ^Ufarnlathis 8 day of August 1986 I l r w`. =son!! I 1° V, CPTY bF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c p' MEMORANDUM o J.' f DATE: August 20, 1986 7L To: Mayor and Mmbers of the Ci until FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ' BY: Lisa A. Nininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPKENT DISTRICT - reques { amen the an Use men o e Genera plan fram Law Density Residential (2 -4 du /acre) to Law Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /acre) for 13.5 acres of land located + on the south side of Feron Blvd., east of Archibald. APN: 209- 055 -02, 03, 14. Staff is requesting a continuance of this item to the September 3, 1986 City Council meeting. This item will be presented it conjunction with the Northtown Park Acquisition Agreement which has been continued to that date to enable finalization of the agreements with the property owners. BB:LAN:dak •� of q•. ,a � h .q,' 'F, 7 -'.5•` .tr , yam, /^,i x���".i:��`l4•.-'S \.:x `Ja:.:.;:.. / •,'� l_ if :'n,SSLji:tiit: .rnrr.• AMC%AU!R,�RF�I►,J/aLICATION STATE OFCAL)FOFNU . v �Ot`UNfYOFSAIiBERNARDINO, as I� Linda Parisianyrestilyth . tl aW. th'Lsaat Adn;tWnr cwt d tux Win 1.• W ana JU[e atWUM and that the attached advertimawi at Notice of Public Hearing Rancho Cucamonga City Council was published in said newspaper One (1) time f towi'; August 8, 1986 ender penalty of p�err�y tht the loreioNi k true sad ture) (Signa Dated at Ontario, Calllornia this day of August _ 1886 I aa>. 's Y a «y4, W✓e k. M ! N'M - Mai cw uN c.w VIN � a «y4, W✓e k. r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 20, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREFMENT - SCHLOSSER FORGE I. BACKGROUND: The Development Agreement before the City Council is e resu of a cooperative effort by the owners and operators of the Schlosser Forge facility (southwest corner of Arrow Highway and Rochester Avenue) and the Planning Commission to address development concerns of the draft revisions to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (I.S.P.). The purpose of the agreement is to pro,lde the owners and operators of the heavy industrial facility with Insurance that the project mly continue to develop under existing land use provisions. It is these provisions which be effected by the revisions to the I.S.P. adopted by the City Council. Detailed discussions and analysis of the agreement are contained in the accompanying Planning Commission report and minutes of July 23, 1986. The Planning Commission, in the action of that date, recommended City Council approval of the agreement. II. DISCUSSION AND ANALY:IS: AS indicated in this and previous staff rep art'. a prime mo vation for the development of the agreement is the anticipated adoption of revisions to the I.S.P. which regulates development of industrial projects. The draft has not yet been formally revie cd by the City Council, but staff is preparing to bring the revisions before the Council on September 3, 1986. With this schedule in mind, it w'pld be appropriate to act on the matter at this time since two rea,.ings would be required to adopt the agreement. The second reaaing could then be withheld until adoption of the revisions to the I.S.P. are finalized by the City Council. III. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt e attached agreement as recommended by the Planning Commission. Further, it is recommended that the City Council direct staff to schedule the second reading of this agreement on the same date that the City Council is begin public hearin3s on the revisions to the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 5 _h �M CITY COUNCIL cTAFF REPORT ' DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - 'SCHLOSSER FOPGE AUGUST 20, 1986 ` PAGE 2 Res tfully mttte Br Buller City Planner BB :AU:ko CC: Edward A. Hobson Attachments: Development Agreement Adopting Ordinance V ro CITY OF ItANCIIU CUCAAIUNUA STAFF REPORT DATE: July ', 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - SCHLOSSER FORGE I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing to consider the approval of a Development Agreement between the City and the owners of Schlosser Forge. This report summarizes the text of the agreement, its purpose, and recommends approval of the document. II BACKGROUND: At the June 25, 1986 meeting, the Banning Commission approved-5e revision to the Industrial Area Specific Plan. A significant change to the document was the modification of certain Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial District boundaries to a less lntens've land use (General Industrial). During its deliberation, the Planning Commission recognized that existing Heavy Industrial uses Immediately adjacent to the proposed boundary change miy have their future development expansion potential affected by more stringent development and Performance standards. It was further determined by the Planning Commission that a Development Agreement protecting potential business expansion for existing industrial facilities would be appropriate In conjunction with a land use change. Schlosser Forge plant is a site which could be affected In this manner. The recommended changer to the ISP posed the redistricting of Subarea 8 along the caste side of the Schlosser Forge site. The Planning Commission condiu.,ned its approval of the land use change on the establishment of a Development Agreement acceptable to the City and the property owners. III. DISCUSSION: The draft agreement allows for the planned expansion see ec on 7) of the :Heavy Industrial use, Schlosser Forge, on the properties currently owned and occupied by the business as detailed in the accompanying Master Plans. Provisions of the document are as follows: A. Compliance with existing land use performance standards. ITEM 11 0 41. y' '•, PLARDING CO- MISSION STAFF REPORT ' K:. Development Agreement' - .Schlosser Forge July 23, 1986 Page 2 D ,r 'v • 'i B. The term of the agreement Is to be twenty -five (25) years. C. Coaptiance with City procedural guidelines and requirements for development. 0. Allows for the customary and usual exactions for public improvements and payment of fees which may be levied against properties in conjunction with further development. , Iv. ANALYSIS: The Agreement, if enacted, provides property and bus ness owners with the assurance that they may develop the forge facility without fear of being. "down- zoned" as the result of neighboring land use pressures. From•the City's point of view, the Agreement will aid in dissolving the perceived land use conflicts which can result from industrial uses of varying intensity. The legal counsel, staff and the property owners find the Agreement satisfactory with one staff recommended change. Section 10-8 (patio 9) should be changed to read as follows: B. In the event that the City imposes an areawide moratorium affecting all simllartly situated industrial property, the City wou1J not be required to issue permits or approval until such moratorium has been lifted or terminated. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning oM sl'- ssfon recommend to the City Council the adoption of the attached Agreement. Res ctfully sylydtt gBradBuller City Planner 00: Ali: ns Attachments: Development Agreement Fit rn "a' i 7 9 r �`3 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSS104 PURPOSES ONLY M. DEVELOPMEIIT AGREEMENT - SCHLOSSER FORGE - An agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamongr, and Philip D. Schlosser, Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Holquin, Jr., Roberta J Holquin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Gene M. Richardson, regarding the future development and current operations of the industrial facility on 27 7 acres at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue - APN 229 - 111 -05, 17, and 18. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. ChairmSn Stout opened the public hearing. Phil Schlosser, applicant, asked that the Planning Commission recommend approval of this Development Agreement ,in order to preserve the Schlosser Forge facility and to not zone it out of the City. _ r�. _ i •. Jim Barton. 8409 Utica, Rancho Cucamonga, supported the request. '`�• "`•• complemented the applicant and City staff on its effort to preserve industry ' "'IN- in the City. There were no further public comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. ",(A `.,;.�•n` �Le.. �_, ...r:.�r �..;.,i. ' %1;Sa,.=-^••jl�>;_ •, ',� „ ^° ;.. ;t�' �iFN !, ' ;>�,r _. -• _• ,psi �. W.... �.: �Y= '..,......��..,...q�.y:..��,-~�.'C:w,:�.. ” •.�., c! -w:✓- i'.. C�.r:3'; :v'I N'fn2` A �; 4- "41 Y: a•R` ,�i_'ttl -k'•:, Y' •w•: J , 1 I Commissioner Rempel supported the agreement stated that the City owes Mr. Sch,osser and the people who first Cana w the City a debt of gratitude since they caused the City to happen. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the purpose of this agreement was to insure protection of this industry after these Commissioners have gone and are „ replaced by new Commissioners. She also supported the agreement. Commissioner MtNiel advised that this Commission had been concerned with Schlosser Fcr;n as other areas around it began to develop and felt this was the best method to insure its protection. Chairman Stout conrarred with these comments and further stated that the Schlosser Forge is one of the cleanest factories he had ever seen. He stated that it is a perfect example that heavy industry does not have to have smoke stacks. Notion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Rempel, to reconmended approval 9f the `'.• ' m? "" Schlosser Forge Development Agreement to the City Council. Motion carried by the foli�wing vote: - - m,'t,u: • �.., :�, '�0� �," 'r ;.fvJ$� .r�� .'y.'q•- >..a .. _ .•-• 'r ^'•; >- .:.( ?,i�(OJi.� . ,::-i'•r. 7.., N:6 �. Y',;3Sn'igr.��'t�l� ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT, REMPEL, CHITIEA, MCNIEL •' -:r .•;•;��r,j,,*`= !; ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 4.. ABSENT: : m•.r) ^m . CO.M,M.� 15 i5I'.0ci N ER..5i' : „Bi j'e?iR�,•'� r'l14�eW d -1i -AR.- ' : 7 „ 'x'�” ,Vi ;z�, • , �� > ,�S,y Gv., T . �+ -'>. "�. .. i• 'm,'r•rm;A•i ^.n ..a ni F.Ir- ei•. C�\ �r>..!'!. y', 7E�y ('.�.��. °�V�•�'lfl_�f%>4'eli. r: i r A W , COVINGTON 6 CROWE nrtowwcve nT wv unrro Cw+xo\ox .la1 W[3T Yi XT •Tw[eT •.•O..J. [ 0u1.iMJ•i onur. GOrax won ernes eoa vie eu•u ..ronu owuw. o, uurowwu anec ro[cn [ [oua«cnr •c[cn r [o..uG n..n . xer[ox August 5, 1986 nn[ w xxocesox ivown. n•w .xoi.a a n\.c \4[• l M1 Mx. 011,..e • Oir\�x [.mw x J.xu x[YV.�L n[G Mr. Alan Warren, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rd., Ste. 'C" P.O Box 007 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Schlosser Fozaa Development Agreement Dear Mr Warren: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of today's date, we enclose herewith an unsigned copy of the Development Agree- ment in regard to the above - captioned entity. EAR: jnh Enclosure �yQ,(Respectfully dward A. opson of COVINGTON a CROW cmoR CEIVED._ PIANNINa DIVISIONUNGA AUG 81986 7�ein�l0�li�ui1j2�3�4�5 6 �66 s`' 1' q6 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT V I r TABLE OF CONT04TS to 'i Page 1. Recitals .................... ............................... 1 2. Definitions ................. ............................... 4 3. Description of Real Property ............................... 4 4. Interest of Property Owners . ............................... a S. Binding Effect of Agreement . ............................... 5 6. Relationship of Parties ..... ............................... 5 7. Purpose of Agreement ........ ............................... 5 S. Applicable General Plan and Zone Deaig nat.jn ............... 6 9. Term of Agreement ........... ............................... 6 10. Time and Rate of Construction .............................. 7 11. Effect of Transfer of Real Property to Another Jurisdiction. 9 12 Specific Restrictions and Entitlements on Development . of the Real Prop: krt1 ... ............................... I....... 10 13 Bold Harmless ........ ...... ............................... 11 14. Effect of Development Agreement on Land Use Regulations.... 14 15. Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement ..................... 12 16. Enforcement .... ............ ............................... 12 17. Event of Def ault ............ ............................... 14 18. Procedure Mon Default ........ ........................... 14 19. Cumulative Remedies ......... ............................... is 20. Recordation ................. ............................... 16 .� 21. Rights of Lender ............ ............................... 16 22. Environmental Impact Report . ............................... 17 ;. 23. General.... o ............................................... 17 to 'i THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 1986, by and between PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER AND ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, husband and wife, as community proper- ( ty, ALBERT W. HOLGUIN, JR. AND ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN, husband and wife, as community property, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER AND JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER, husband and wife, as community property, and DAVID N. arcHARDSON AI4D JEAN M. RICHARDSON, husband and wi -e. as community property ( "Property Owners ") and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation organized and eristiny under the laws of the State of California ( "City "). 1. Recitals. A. Government Coda sections 65864- 65895.5 auth- orize the City to enter irto binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. B. The parties collectively described herein as Property Owners are the owners in fee simple absolute of approximately twenty -seven and seven - tenths (27.7) acres of real property, more or lean, bounded by Rochoater Avenue on , the east and Arrow Route on the north, located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (here- . inafter referred to as the °Real Property). As of 'he 4 date r. #roof, Property Owners have constructed on the real ' property four (4) buildings containing approximately one aundred thirty thousand (130,000) square feet. The improved portion of the Real Property, however, currently only occu- pies approximately seven and seven - tenths (7.7' acres. There are approximately twenty (20) gross acres of develop- able but unimproved real property remaining in the Real Property Property Owners have developed a conceptual master plan for the Real ^roperty showing possible improve- . ments to be constructed over the next fire (5) years and over the following fifteen (15) to twenty -five 125) years. These conceptual plans are attached hereto, mat ked Exhibits •B" and '.." respectively, and incorporated herein by refer- ence. These conceptual plans are attached for illustrative purposes only) final improvement plans and final site plans must be appreved by the City using the criteria established herein. At final buileout, it is contemplated by Property Owners that the Real Property could contain at least eleven (11) buildings, having a total gross square footage of between four hundred thot -sand (400,000) to five hundred thousand (500,000) square feet} all cuch development is i; subject to applicable standards. C. The Real Property is currently being used for :navy industrial manufacturing. The Real Property currently has a designation under the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan (hereinafter 'IASP") of Minimum Impact/Heavy 2 �O b r n;a ,t �x Industrial. Allowable activities within the Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial area include manufacturing, proces- sing, fabrication, warehousing, storage and freight handling. Uses typical of those allowed within the area are forge shops, steel milling facilities, plastic plants, steel fabrication and metal fabricating facilities, woodworking facilities, machine shops and chemical storage and distribu- tion. The Real Property further falls within Subarea 9 in the IASP As such, the Real Property is subject to a one hundred (100) foot right -ef -way (fifty (50) feet from center ne) for both Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route, and a forty -five (45) foot landscaping requirement (measured from ultimate face of curb, for both streets). D. The nanufacturing uses currently conducted on the property result in some noise and vibrations and other impacts on the Real Property. It is not anticipated that these impacts will lessen in the future or with additional construction on the Real Property and may, in fact, increase Operations currently conducted on the Real Property shall not violate applicable ordinances and performance standards, however. E. Property Owners have requested the City to enter Into a development agreement and proceedings have been taken In accordance with City's rules and regulations. P. The City has found that this proposed Development Agreemen� is consistent with the General Plan, the IASP and 3 / O p 2 t � R c a E J the goals and objectives of each. G. On , 1986, City adopted Ordinance No. approving the Development Agreement with the Property Owners and the ordinance thereafter took effect on , 1986. 2. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terma shall have the following meaning: A. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. B. "Project" is the development consisting of building and improvements which may be constructed by Property Owners on the Real Property, described further in paragraph elow. C. "Property Owners" are PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT W. UOLGUIN, JR., ROBERT J. HOLGUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER, DAVID M. RICHARDSON, JEAN M. RICHARDSON, and Includes all of their heirs, successors, administrators, personal repre- sentatives, successore in interest and assigns. D. "Real Property" is the real property referred Co in paragraph IC above. 3 Description of Real Property. The Real Property which is the subject of this Agreement is described more fully in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein , by reference. 4. Interest of Property Owners. Property Owners rep- 4 ;, - MEMMIN, 0 f+ resent that they have full legal title to the Real Property, ti+ that they have full legal right to enter into this Agreement t and to the beat of their knowledge that there is no person or entity which has any other interest in fee ownership to Z, the Real Property; Property Owners further represent that all other persons and entities who may hold legal or equit- able interest in the Property agree to be and are bound by this Agreement. IL tht.e are any holders of deeds of trust :4 on the Real Property which may be senior to the lien of this yDevelopment Agreement, the holders of such deeds of trust have assented to the terms of this Development Agreement in writing and agree to be bound by the previsions hereof. 'y 5. Binding Effect of Agreement. The burdens of this l Agreement shall run with the Real Property and shall bind, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, the successors in interest and assigns of the parties to it. 6. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between the City and the Property Owners is such that the Property owners are indep- endent contractors and are not the agents of City for any purpose whatsoever. 7. Purpose of Agreeme,,' The rurpose of this Agree- ment is to guarantee the Property Owners that they will be able to develop, construct upo'i and build out improvements y%31 on the balance of tt,e Real Property consistent with the current Minimum Impact /Heavy InA% trial use o_ the Real 5 - �,.. i a i G Property, and under the current restrictions, regulations and entitlements of the City including, but not limited to, the IASP and Subarea 9 thereof. For this purpose, it is intended that neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof should restrict the ability of Property Owners to build out and develop the balance of the Real Property following the guidelines, specifics and rnquirements of the IASP. Further, neither this Agreement nor any part thereof provides any guarantee to the City of any future development of the unimproved portion of the Real Property. , 8. Applicable General Ptan and Zone Designation. The IASP designation for the Real Property is Minimum Impact /heavy Industrial established by the IASP adopted by the City Council of City on August 19, 1981. All of the provisions of the IASP, as amended, in effec, as of the date hereof are incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. The allowable uses, development restric- tions and performance criteria and standards for development within said IASP and specifically Subarea 9 thereof are incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full; specific sections of the IASP and requirements and entitlements of Subarea 9 are attached as Exhibit 'D' hereto and incorporated into this Development Agreement by this reference. 9. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof, regardless of the date of -„ ;i "i'1 Rai ^b�� Y•� '`Y L' actual execution hereof, and shall continue for twonty -five (25) years and may be extended by City and Property Owners thereafter. 10. Time and Rate of Construction. The City may im- pose no time limit on Property Owners' ability to construct improvements on the Real Property, nor may the City impose any type of restriction on the Real Property or the Property Owners as to the rate of construction on the Real Property !whether to limit the number of square feet built per year, number of fire hydrants available to the Real Property, or any other similar or dissimilar type of restriction). At any time in the future as Property Owners may seek approval to construct additional improvements on the Real roperty, axcept as provided herein City shall place nr restrictions as to r��e of development, the number of square feet which may be built or occupied in ail, period or calendar year or any othor limitatiory whatsoever on the Property Owners' ability to construct the improvements. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the City may require Property Owners to comply with all of the rui.s, regulations, ordin- ances and codes currently applicable in the IASP or Subarea 9 thereof. The City may also require compliance with pro- cedural guidelines and requirements, providing only that such procedural guidelines and requirements do not violate the letter or the spirit of this Agreement. The City may r ,� not impose any special building restrictions or special fees 7 or assessments as a•condition to approval of development on the Real Property which are different than those imposed on development or construction of heavy industrial improvements similarly situated in the City. However, the City may i impose such fees and assessments on applications for R development approvals on the Real Property and such fees and assessments for permits and as conditions to approval as are i i applied to all minimum impact heavy industrial property city -wide. In the event that Property Owners request approval of plans to construct improvements on the Real Property, City shall promptly process the same without unreasonable delay. Such plans shall be reviewed by the City in accordance with standards and requirements currently ' applicable to the current zoning and IASP designation for i• the Real Property, as is more fully described in paragraph 9 above. If the plans for the future improvements proposed to be constructed by Property Owners are consLstent with the rules and standards now in effect relating to the construc- tion of improvements in Subarea 9 (Minimum Impact/ Heavy Industrial) of the IASP of the City, such plans shall be approved by the City in such form as it normally provides for like approvals. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the City shall not be required to allow such • development end /or construction in the following circum- t seances: A. If Property Owners bad failed or refused to 8 f, l9C c d. ,y �4 comply with a condition of approval imposed by the City consistent with the provisions of the current zoning and IASP designation to a previous or contemporaneous applic�- tion or permit issued or conditionally issued to Property Owners, City would not be required to make additional approvals unLil Property Owners had complied with such conditional D. In the event that City imposes an area -wide moratorium affecting all similarly situated industrial prop- erty, the City would not be required to issue permits or approvaln until such moratorium had been lifted or terminatedi C. where Lhe City is under some form of legal restriction (as where third persons or entities have legally prohibited City from issuing development approvals for similar projects) from issuing permits to Property Owners, the City shall use its best efforts :a lift.such restriction to enable Property Owners to exercise their rights under this Agreement but shall be under no obligation to finalize approvals until such third party restriction *ties been liftedy and D. The City would have no lognl obligation to t issue additional approvals or permits if Property Owners were in default under this Agreement, until the default of Property Owners had been remedied or eliminated. 11. Effect of Transfer of Real Property to Another 9 I s� Jurisdiction. If all or any portion of the Real Property subject of this Agreement is annexed to or otherwise becomes part of another city, this Agreement shall terminate forthwith. ,s- 12. Specific Restrictions and Entitlements on Develop - mene of the Real Property. In addition to the IASP and zoning classification described above, the specific restric- tions, performance criteria and entitlements of Subarea 9 of the IASP, set forth at length in Exhibit "D" hereto, shall, together with other applicable Codes and requirements, govern and control the City's requirements .or development and construction on the Real Property for height and parking restrictions, building site coverage, building setbacks, site landscaping, noise levels and so forth. The following shall also control the use and future development of the Real Property: A. Permitted uses on or of toe Real Property shall be any permitted or conditionally permitted use which may currently be made on real property located in the IASP and designated Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial in the City, as set forth more specifically in Table 111 -1 of Exhibit "D" hereto. D. The City may not require indirectly (whether by way of fee, in lieu contribution or otherwise) exactions or compliance on the part of Property Owners other than as ` _r specifically set forth in this Agreement. Notdithstanding t � 14 ,r• s the generality of the foregoing, the City may require payment of normal and usual processing, filing and permit fees. The City may also require normal, customary and usunl exactions for public improvements and payment of such fees and assessments wb WW may be levied or assessed a5ainst the Real Property and adjacont or contiguous properties (such as 1911 Act assessment district assassments, parkway and street light maintenance district assessments). 13. Hold Harmless. Property Owners agree to and shall hold City, its officers, igents, employees and representa- tives, harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury including death and claims for property damage which may arise :rom the direct or indirect operation of Property Owners or those of their contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees or any other person or entity acting on their behalf which would relate to the Real Property, the operation of improvements currently thereon, or the construction of any future improvements thereon. Property Owner agrees to and shall defend City and its officers, agents, employees and representatives from actions for damages to third persons or entities caused by or alleged to have been caused by reason of Property Owners' activities in connection with this Development Agreement or with the Real r'roperty. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reanon of the operations 11 i -4 •,S t Y referred to in this Development Agrooment, regardless of t whether or rot the City prepared, supplied or approved the ' plans, specifications or other documents for the Project. n 14. Effect of Development Agreement on Land Use R09111- ations. The rulos, regulations and official polieica gover- ning permitted uses and development of the Real Property during the term of this Agreement, density and intensity of development on the Real Property, and design and improvement standards and specifications applicable to construction of improvements on the Real Property during the term of this Agreement, are those rules, regulations, official policies s and standards in force at the time of this Agreement and not as the same may be changed, modified or supplemented from time to time in the Future. Standards imposed on actual construction of improvements (the Unifirm Building Cone) and reviews and standards imposed by third persons and entities (SCAQMD, Cucamonga County Water District, and so forth) shall be those which are imposed at the time of approval of any development request for all or any portion of the Real Property. 15. Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This Agree- ment may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part only by mutual written consent of the par, tea and then in the manner provided for in Covernment Coda sections 65868, at seq. 16. Enforcement. Unless amended or cancelled as pro- vided in this Agreement, this Development ,agreement iv ' ILL 'az, M, enforceable by any party hereta nothwithstanding a change in the IASP, or any General or Specific Plan, or any applicable zoning standards or regulations adopted by the C1tj which alter or amend the rules, regulations or policies currently governing permitted uses of the Real Property; or density, design and /or improvement standards and apacifications therefor. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Property Owners, City may given written notice to the Property owners by personal service on the representative thereof (or his or her successor) at the address set forth below, or by registered or certified mail, %ddresa,i to Property Owners at the address stated in this Agreement, or co such other addresses as may have been deaignate9 Dy Property Ownera. if s.,ch violation is not corrected j the reasonable satisfaction of the City within thirty (30) days after the date such notice is given, City may, on thirty (30) days written notice, declare a default under this Agreement and, upon at,y such declaration of , default and after providing any required timo to care or to begin to effect a cure, the City may bring any action necas- nary to enforce the obligations of Property Owners arising ' out of the operation of thin Development Agreement. Upon written notice to City and provision of a thirty (30) day period to cure or begin to effect a cure, Property Owners may declare a default under this Agreement. Upon any such ;. declaration of default by City or Property Owners, the party Y .. 13 /97 Y a., k giving the declaration may bring any action necessary to enforce the obligations to the other party arising out of the operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for specific performance of the provisions of this Development Agreement or for an injunc- tion against any violation by the other party of any provi- siono hBteef, or for any such other relief s may be app-o- priate. It to agraed by both parties that the injury to the non - breaching partl :rising out of % default under any of the terms of this Development Agreement would be irreparable and that it would be extremely difficult to ascertain the amount of compensation to the non - breaching party to afford adequate relief in light of the purposes and policies advanced and satisfied by the approval of the eventual right of Property Owners to build oat the Real Property, t-) house their business thereon, and by this Development Agreement. 17. Event of Default. Either party shall be in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of th, following events or conditions, A. Breach by either party of any of the provi- sions or terma of this Agreement, after notice and an opportunity to cure has been Frovided, if no acts to cure the breach or default are commenced within the time period after service of the notice of default on the other party and therebfter diligently continued to completion. WS 'N 14 ;. 18. Procedure Upon Default. :.. pon the occurrence of an event of default which has gone unremedied, the non - breaching party, at its election, may terminate this Agreement. B. The non - breaching party does not waive any claim of defect in the performance by the breaching party of + the terms and provisions of this Agreement if the non - breaching party does not propose to modify or terminate this Agreement. C. Non - performance shall not be excused because of the failure of any third persor or entity. D. An express repudiation, refusal or renuncia- tion of this Agreement, if the some is in writing and signed by the Property Owners, shall be sufficient to terminate this Agreement and a hearing on the matter shall not be required. E. All other remed.es at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided it, this Agreement or in the regulations of City governing development agreements gener- ally are available to the parties hereto l., the event that there is d breach or this Development Agreement. 19. Cumilativ. Remedies. The respective rights and remedies provided by this Development Agreement or by law or available in equity shall be cumulative, and the exercise of any one or sore of such rights or remedies shall not pre- ` elude or affect the exercise, at the same or at different ` 1� 15 ' • irti: times, of any other such rights or remedies for the same or different defaults or beaches or for the sme or different failures to parform or observe any term or provision of this i Agreement. 20. Recordation. This Agreement shall, at the expense of the Property Ownera, be recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino in accordance with provi- sions of the Government Code, and a copy of the recorded instrument delivered to City by Property Owners. 21. Rights of Lender. Should Property Owners incur any encumbrance oh the Real Property, the lender havina such encumbrance shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance tot A. Do any act or thing required of Property Owners under this Agreement, and by such act or thing done and performed by lender shall be as effective as if done by Property Owners themselves. B. Realise on the security afforded by the encumbrance by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or In equity or by the security instrument ('trust deed ") in the event of default thereunder and tot (i) Transfer, ronvey or assign the title of Property Owners to any purchasn• in any foreclosure, sale, whether the foreclosure vale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in the _. 16 aoU t 0 trust deed! (11) Acqui and succeed to the interest of Property Owners by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure Bare be conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in the trust deed. Foreclosing lenders or purchasers at foreclosure sales of any kind shall be considered to be successova in interest of Property Owners for all purposes under this Agreement. 22. Environmental rmoact FR ort. Property Owners acknowledge that, under currant City ordinances and regLla- tions, further development on the Real Proper y might be subject to an environaontal impact analysis and preparation of an environmental impact roport. In this regard, it is the express intention of the parties to preserve, as much as is legclly possible, the ability for Property Owners to build out and improve the balance of the Real Property consistent with current ordinances and regulations irrespec- tive of land use changes which may occur in other areas and on other cuntlguous or proximate properties. 23. ar eral. A. Entire Agreement. This Agreement couatitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersodes all agreemonts, representations, warranties, statements, promi- sea and /or understandinge, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof and no party 8.3011 be 17 aoi "t N bound by any such representation, statement, promise or understanding not specifically sot forth in this Agreement. B. Notice. All Notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by personal service, or by certified or registered mail, postage pre - paid, return receipt requested, to the parties. Any written notice to any of the parties required or permitted hereunder shall he deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally or seventy -two (72) hours after the mailing. Rejection or otner refusal Lo accept or the inabtiity to deliver because of changed address of which no nottc� was given as provided hereunder shall be deemed to be receipt of the notice, demand or request sent. Notices to the patios shall be addressed as set forth at the conclu- sio-t of this Tgraemcnt. By giving the other party at least thirty (?o) days written notice thereof, the parties hereto ahall avo the right from time to time or at any time during the te•w hereof to change their respective addresses for notice C. Severability. In the event that any of the provia:;nn, or portions thereof, of this Agreement are held to be uuenforce.,ble or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be affected thereby. D. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be con, 18 ' ' v aoa strued and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California now in effect. E. Inurement. Subject to the restrictions against transfer or assignment as herein contained, the provisions of thi - Ireement shall inure to the benefit of and ba binding upon the assignee successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs, and legatees of each of the parties hereto. F. Amendment. This Agreement may only be amen- .. ded by the written consent of all of th^i parties to this Agreement at the time of such amendment. G. Binding Effect. Except as provided herein to the contrary, this agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective legal reprosentativere successors and assigns. H. Further Execution of Documents. The ptrties hereto agree to execute and file and to join in the execu- tion and filing of any and all agreements, consents or other documents reasonably necessary to effect the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby, as either party hereto may reasonably require. I. Attorneys' Fees. Should any litigation or arbitration be commenced betw.en the parties hereto or their representatives or should any party institute any proceeding +� in a bankruptcy or similar court which has jurisdiction over any other party hereto or any or all of his property or its 19 C' Mr property or assets, which litigation concerns any provisions of this Agreement, or the rights and duties of any person or entity in relation thereto or to interpret any provision hereof, a party or parties prevailing in such 'litigation shall be entitled, in addition to such other relief as may be granted, to a reasonable sum as and for its or their attorneys' fees and court costs ,incurred in ouch litigation, which shall be determined by the court in such litigation or in a separate action brought for that purpose, should the same be necessary. J. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which toge,•her will,conatitute one and the same agreement. C. Section and Other 8eadings. The section and ether headings contained in this Agreement are for reference Eurposes only and will not affect the interpretation or v,eaning of this Agreement. L. Miscellaneous. The agrenments contained herein shall not be construed in favor of or against either party but shall be construed as if all parties prepared this agreement. The masculine and neuter genders, the singular f number and the present tenon shall be deemed to include the .v '.T ')l 20 ' =3 °J femini,:o gander, the plural number, and past and future tenses, respectively, where the context so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement ban been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the day and year first above written regardless o.' the date of actual execution hereof. CITY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY -_ - Mayor BY • City Clerk APPRLVED AS TO FORtf: City Attorney PROPERTY OWNERS: PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER Address:__ ELAINE M. SC9LOSVER i Address: ALBERT HOLGUIN, JR. Address: 21 `pe - Lo's Y• a 1' i M; 1 ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN Address: JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER Address: JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER Address: DAVID M. RICHARDSON Address: JEAN M. RICHARDSON Address: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )as. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On ' 196 , before me, the undersigned, a r Notary Public in and fo said County, personally appeared PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT HW GUIN, JR., ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER, DAVID M. RICHARDSON, JEAN M. RICHARDSON, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed it. Notary Public (SEAL) 22 r,� v r ' +5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) -. )as. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On , 198_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared and , proved to me on the basis ev norm to e t e persons who execu- ted this instrument as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively', of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation existing and organized under the laws of the State of California, and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed it. ' Notary Public (SEAL) gtDEVAOR 23 , EXHIBIT "A" (Legal Description) �n Parcel 1: Lots :5 and 26, Town of Rochester, as per Plat recorded ir. Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Official Records of San'Bernardino County, EXCEPTING THEREPRIM, the west 438.66 feet thereof. Parcel 2: The west 438.66 feet of Lots 25 and 26 of Rochester, as per Plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Of£icia1 Records of San sernardino County, EXCEPTING THEBEPROM, the west 50 feet of said Lot 25. Pe:cel 3: Lot 27, according to ,Map of Rocheater, as per Plat recorded In Book 9 of Mapn, Page 20, Official Records of San Bernardino County, California. n n n mi, n' a PROPERTY PLAN TO 1990 ' I 1 1 i 1 I � iIt I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ae Ili 1 1 •I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 �� II 1 1 I 1 1 � 1 I 1 ------------------------- ,4 SCALEI 1" =200' v: EXHIBIT 'B" A-11711-024A 4 -17-86 6• ' ,a PROPERTY PLAN MATURE 7 I 1 �• — 1 1 1 .J —. — ��-- .— .----- - -� - -� 1 r - - - -. — � 1 Cf1 � 1 � I ' 1 I ' � 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ; 1 pSl I 1 t 1 1 1 1 � 1 --�PCWI 1 � I I f SCALE: 1" =200' EXHIBIT "C" -- A -1 1 7 1 1 -025A, i `4 /CZ 4-17-:,136 `.i :Y_•tte u ] R LAND USE PLAR Use of the Industrial lands Is u:ganized to provide a broad range of industrial development opportuni- ties ranging from light /industrial type of acco. - dations to sites for heavy, rail - served Industrial plants. cased on consideration of road and rail access, the relationship to surroinding non- indus- trial Uses, City-wide plan policins and the parcel - Ization pattern, land within the Industrial Area Is assigned to major land use cit"surles: - Industrial Park - General Industrial - General Industrial/Hall-Served - Heavy Industrlal /Hall - Served The definition: of the four industrial land use categories follows in Table II -1, and the dis- trlbutlon of these uses are shown In Figure II -1 Land Use Plan A more oetalled deflnWon of permitted and conditionally permitted uses Is listed In Part III EXHIBIT "D" t II -7 ,Y , r. TABLE II -1 INDUSTRIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES INDUSTRIAL PARK GROUP Land is reserved for Indus •Ial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant warkinr - nvlronmenc and a I.ta Ion which has prestige value. Approximateit 1238 acres have been , located to this use, o- 263 of the total Industrial Park group designation permit light Industrial uses, office and administration facile.les, research and drvolopmant laboratories, limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commeroial service uses The Industrial Park areas are characterized by a high employment density The development and design standards are developed to protect lands in this use group from development which Is Inappropriate due to either function, appear- . ante or environmental affects GENERAL INDUSTRIAL GROUF This group provides for the widest pos -lble range of light and medium industrial type activity, Including manufactur- ing, assemtling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses; Totaling approximately 1570 acres, or 333 of the Industrial Area land This land use category is appropriate as a buffer between non - Industrial uses and heavy Industrial uses. In these areas the applicable development and design standards are less demanding than those of the Industrial park areas, but safeguards are provided to ensure a pleasant wail- functioning environment The required land area per parcel Is also less demanding than other IndLstriai areas so as to accommodate smaller firms GENERAL INDUSTRIAL /RAIL- SERVED GROUP Uses permitted In areas designated as general Industrial /rail - served are similar to those In the general Industrial use group Approximately 715 acres, or 153, are designated In this use group In the Industrial Area The major difference Is the condition encouraging uses to be either rail- served or functionally linked to a rail- served land by non -rail using activities. The develop- ment and design standards are also generally equivalent to those in the general industrial use group, but a larger parcel size standard Is established to ensure sizes sufficient to accommodate rail using Indus- trial uses II -4 /o- ♦X t TABLE 11 -1 (Continuted) INDUSTRIAL IAND USE CATEGORIES i MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL GROUP Approximately 537 acres or 11% of land Is reserved for minimum Impact heavy Industrial uses. The development standards a`re designed to provide for heavy Industrial uses which will not significantly Impact on the surrnunding aria.. Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial activities Include manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage and freight h'andilnr,. ` Uses typical of this group Include but are not limited to forge .hops, steel milling facilities, plastic plants, steel•4abricatlon, metal fabricating facilities, woodworking facilities, heavy machine shops and chemica l storage and distribution. Not permitted within the,area are ,•� usus which require massive structures outside of buildings o•• unscreened Open air storage of larger quantities of raw, seml - refined, or finished } products. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL GROUP Approximately 675 acres or 45% of land eas•: of Devore Freeway is reserved for Heavy Industrial Uses. Tha deveiopmmt standards are designed to provide for all heavy industrlpl uses., Heavy ' Industrial activities include manufacturing, eompeundlng,%irocessing, fabrication, warehousing, storage, and freight handling We characteristics of this group would Include large structures to facilitate processing and open air storage of iargs amount of raw or semi - refined products. Uses within this area typically Include but are not limited to; vehicular assembly plants, power plants, concrete product manufactures and batch j" plants i. E a. ✓�r. a a wi sr, i Traffic Projections 111. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS this section addresses vehicular access and circula- tion, transit, rail, and pedestrian and bicycle roues Parking provisions ire discussed in Part: III under Parking Requirements. The plan for the circulation system Is shown, in Figure It -2 and des- cribed within this section Traffic Analysis : OKS Associates prepared an initial Rancho Cucamonga City -wide and Industrial Area Traffic Study in 1980. An additional analysis was ccnducted to batter reflect local access within the Industrial " Area and to estimate peak period traffic volumes for detailed analysis A description of the process utilized to develop the traffic model can b found In Appendix A. Slgnificsnt observations made from the traffic model relative to the projected traffic volumes_ in the Industrial Area are: • Highest ADT volumes arc, along Haven Avenue and roothill Boulevard. Haven Avenue volumes are on the •., -er of 50- 60,000 vehicles per dr , cssuming sufficient c;.paclty Is pro- v1dad • Total east /west traffic volumes accessing the Devors Freeway within the Industrial Area (4th Street and Fonthlll Boulevard) are projected to be high This Is only_partlally,offset by the assumed presence of additional Interchange at 7th Street. • The projected east /west traffic count on Foothill Boulevard Is projected to 45,000 AOT at Haven Avenue which is at capacity • ADT volumes on 6th and 7th Streets are In- crnased substantlally due to the assumption of a 7th Strent /Devore Freeway interchange In the _• General Plan Update Program. 4owever, volumes are not unreasonably high relative to capacl -' ties available. , w •i .w L- E t`E L r� i. U. r� :4 r I.y I� I� .I� -a I� sa r 7 ii coy : o About 20,000 vehicles per day In the Haven - Milliken corridor are associated with the Ontario Motor Speedway cmn_rcial develop- ment assumptions If the Speedway were to rema In or be developed with lower traffic generating uses, Haven and Milliken Avenue volumes would be reduced accordingly Figure II -j shows the results of the volume projec- tions. Level of Service Adequate capacity on existing and planned roadways Is needed to ensure efficient traffic flows and an acceptable level of service on streets in the In- dustrial area Traffic volumes can be related to descriptions of traffic performance to determine the level of service available at an Intersection Table II -2 describ these performance levels Midblock Roadway Midblock .o..way capacities were determined for the Capac l ty major street segments In the Industrial Area 4 descrlptlon of the procedures used O, determina m Id block capacities and volume -to- capacity ratios for the street segments era included within Appe dlx A. The streets within the Industrial Area pro- jected to potentially experience substantial over - Ioadinq are Foothrli Boulevard and Haven Avenue Heaviest volumes o, Foothill Boulevard are project- ed toward the east near the Devore Freeway, Indicat- Ing a significant freeway access problem. However, alternative Industrial Area freeway access routes- - 7th and 4th Streets- -are projected to operate satis- factorily throughout the Industrial Area In the north -south direction, Haven Avenue Is substantially overloaded along Its length. Relief for Haven Ave- nue will be discussed further In the next section. Vehicular Access and The roadway network In the Industrial Area (and Circulation City) Is laid out In a basic one mile grldlron pattern. In the already developed portion of the Industrial Area (west of Haven) this gridiron system Is further broken down to 1/2 mile intervals The proposed circulation system, as shown In Figure II -2, follows this gridiron pattern to the smallest unit of roughly 1/8 mile (which would form a 10 acre square erld), where smaller Fropertles exist. Gen- erally, a quarter -mile grid pattern has been adhered to. 11 -II _/f ` t "ye (1 f 1 le if rf i� �a= 'fl SJ O T A W O v G O r N .Q `F. �YCKV. _ ZS i � r (1 f 1 le if rf i� �a= 'fl SJ O T A W O v G O r N .Q `F. �YCKV. 11 -13 v TABLE II -2: LEVELS OF HIGHWAY SERVICE INTERPRETATION Delay Range Volume to Level of (See per Capacity Service Description Vehicle Ratil A Excellent operation. All approaches to 0 -16 0 -60 Percent signalized intersection appear quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers -find freedom of operation. No vehicles wait longer than one red traffic signal Indication. 0 Very good operation. 'many drivers begin 16 -22 60 -70 Percent to feel somewhat restricted within pla- toons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach to a signal- ized Interrectlon may occasionally be fully utilized, and a substantial number of cycles are are approaching full use. C Geod operation. Occasionally drivers 22 -28 70 -80 Percent may have to wait through mare than one red signal Indication, and back -ups may develop behind turning vehicles Most drivers feel somewhat restricted This level Is typically associated with urban dtsign practices. D Fair operation Cars are required to 28 -35 80 -90 Percent wait through more than one traffic cycle during short peaks There are no long- standing traffic queues. E Poor operation. Some longstanding vehic- 35-40 99-100 Prrcen- ular queues develop on critical approaches to Intersections Delays may be up to several signal cycles. F Forced flow. Represents Jammed condl- 40 or Over 100 Percent bons Backups from locations down- stream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehic- les out of the Intersection approach lanes, therefore, volumes are not predictable Potential for stop and go type traffic flow Source: Based on National Academy of Sclences. P.IghwaY Capacity Manual, 1965, and the Draft Final Report for update of [ne Manua 11 -13 v i Roadway Cross - sections for roadway requirements were deter- Cross - Sections mined based on midblock roadway capacities Major " Arterials W th 120 foot right- of-way In the Indus- trial Area Include: o North /south roadways of Haven Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard, and Milliken Avenue. — k' o East /west roadways of Foothill Boulevard, — 6th and 7th Streets between Haven Avenue and the Devore Freeway and 4th Street — Major arterials with 100 foot right -of -way Include: o t7urtP,.outh roadways of Archibald Avenue and ikw Rochester, Etiwanda Avenue o East /west roadway of Arrow Route Secondary Arterials with 88 foot right -of -way In- clude: — o Vineyard Avenue, Hellman Avenue, Cleveland Aversue, and 6th Street west of Haven Avenue — These streets w,il form the basic 1/2 mile grid system. The other streets, which will further divide the circulation network Into 114 and 1/8 _ mile grids, will have rights- of-way ranging from 54 .feet to 88 feet. Figure II -4 presents midblock cross - sections of each street classification type with lane requiremerts. { Roadway Network Tne following roadway modifications are recoarv,nded — Modifications w!thin the Industrial area o New Rochester. As discussed In the City -wide ar,d Industrial Area traffic Study and Incorp- orated In the Industrial Area Plan, Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to Sth Strcat should be ° relocated to the west This Is needed to pro- vide adequate distance for turning lanes be- tween the Rochester and Devare Freeway ram ° Intersections along 4th and (In the futureg i 70e Streets. Desirably, this new alignment should be carried north to the first collector ° street beyond Foothill Boulevard, thereby �+ providing a continuous, direct, north -south ^' `a route to supplement Milliken Avenue e.� �f a tI -14 ass y, 9 I e .„�< w� �44v.= �'ii."• �W �, Wt.`�� '4 .� yt. •yti ate.. s:.': •��..; i yJ r ' i1t r • New Rochester (Continued). Hu+aver, the ATLSF • - - way p ens to construct a railroad yard - approximately between existing Rochester Ave - 1 nue and•future Milliken Avenue. To avoid grade , �.• separating New Rochester over tho railroad .. yard, the existing Rochester grade crossipg should be retained This would necessitate a _ tight reverse curve frrid New Rochester to ex- Isting Rochester south of the AUSF tracks. Attached with Appendix B is the suggested align- ment for How Rochester • Da Creek Boulevard. This bitnment Is part of the Victoria Community Plan and will cxssld southerly across Arrow Route and connect Into ` Rochester Avenue north of the ATLSF tracks. • Cleveland Avenue. The need for additional t north south roadway capacity through Elie Indus- trial Area Is dependent upon future deveicfman[ level in the Ontario Motor Speedway and In the area bounded by Haven Avenue, Base Line Road, Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route At projected traffic levels, there appears to be a need for an additional roure from Foothill Boulevard to 1 -10 to reduce traffic on Haven and Milliken Avenue and reduce overloads on Foothill /Haven •and Foothill /Mll, liken To accomplish this, Cleveland Avenue should extend south of•5th Street and connect across the San aernardlno Freeway to a new soutn frontage road. Cle-e- land Avenue would 'upgrade capacity sufficiently through Rancho Cucamonga's Industrial Area, but much of that traffic would stilt have to accass the freeway at Haven or'Mtlllken Avenue. Hence, this improvement, unless cwupled with 1 -10 free- way access Improvements In Ontario, would move the traffic bottleneck farther south. At a minimum. It would appear necessary to provide a grade - separated crossing of 1 -10 at Cleveland Avenue and to tie Cleveland Avenue Into a one - way frontage road system paralleling the freeway r Existing "G" Street In Ontario could tie used as tte north (westbound) frontage road These lm-• r provements should be considered In any redivcl- opment of the Ontario Motor Speedway and vieln- era Ity by the City of Ontario „ � yY Y•, c 1� y. Y� FIG. 11 -4 STREET CLASSIFICA, i ICBM MAJOR ARTERIAL DIVIDED (120 ft. ROW) • Foothill • Haven • Milliken • 9th • 8th between Haven & • Day Creek Blvd R f R f • Archibald m•r�wa���� —,,II MAJOR ARTERIAL (100 ft. ROW) •Arrow 14 18' 114' 12 tx 18' i •" • New Rochester 72 1 ft, a• ' g;=• _ • Archibald m•r�wa���� —,,II a5 •Arrow 14 18' 114' 12 tx 18' i •" • New Rochester 72 1 ft, a• ' g;=• • Etiwnada• 100 ft, 10 ;a 4; .14 • 3outu of Arrow substitute two-way left turn lone for median island SECONDARY (88 ft. ROW) ' • Vineyard • Hallman e Cleveland • 6th West of Have f • Turner • Jersey SECONDARY (74 ft. ROW) • 6th Fast of Devore • 1laner • Jersey. •80' Right -of -Way ALL LuCAL INDUSTRIAL (54 ft. ROW) i • 6th West of Rochester • 8th • 9th • Center • Santa Anita • (Old Rochester) 7 • Baker" .* • Other Local Streets •66' Right -of -way 4 Y �C r' y F Y Haven and Milliken Separation Studies Peak Period Intersection Volumes B o Sixth Street- Seventh Street. The need for ` ef IF Icierit access from 5 1xt Street to the pro- posed Interchange at Route 15 /Seventh Street, Faints to a strong continuity between Sixth and Seventh The use of intersections would tequlre dual right turn as well as left turn lanes which rn,uld involve long, complex traf- fic signal cycles An alternative to using two Intersections Is a curved, contlrvouN con nectron as a means of going from Sirth to Seventh There will be a need for silitting the traffic wishing to go south on Rote 15 between the 4th Street Interchange and `he 7th Street Interchange. This Is best accomplished by eliminating as much delay and Inconvenience as possible from the trip along Sixth and north to Seventh W o 8th Street Portions of 8th Street can be a- _ anndond Ne; een Haven Avenue and Rochester Avenue If requird for rail service o Milliken Avenue. The at -grade portion of the proposed Milliken Avenue extension (4th Street to Foothill Boulevard) will be aligned to be compatible with a future railroad grade sepa- ,- ratlon, ma lnllne and spur railroad service needs and possible utility corridors Railroad grade separations are proposed at Haven and Milliken Avenues and the ATSSF railway The precise alignments for Haven and Milliken Avenues at the separation locations are shown on plans pre- pared by ORS Associates and are Included In Appen- dix C These plans define the additional right -of- way needed to the adjacent parcels. Peak period Intersection volumes were utilized to determine the number of lanes needed for an Inter- section to operate at Level of Service "B" The results are shown In Table II -3 A further expla- nation of the Volume /Capacity Ratio V/C Is given In Appendix A �.n II -IB a. ;L L his •� r; I z' t r tI 'J �l 3 I i1 J TABLE II -3 PROJCCTED VOLUME /CAPACITY RATIOS - INTERSECTIONS, AT LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" Policies and Arterials 1f 45 _ r.�il As Table 11 -3 indicates, the Foothill /Haven Inter- section Is the most overloaded intersection in the City and Is expected to operate substantially above capacity Foothill /Mllllken Is expected to operate above capacity and Milliken /4th will operate Just at capacity A detailed presentation of all major Intersection lanes and right-of-way requirements Is presentr� n Figure 11 -5 Generally, each intersection Includes one separate left turn lane and as many through lanes as there are travel lanes upstream At some Intersections, double left turn lanes and /or a right turn lane may be necessary. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS POLICIES In order to ensure the effectiveness and capacity of arterlals, It w,il be necessary to establish and enforce rigid access control policies These controls are currently In effect under the pro- visions of the Planning Commission Resolution 78 -29 o Non access to all arterials shall be dedicated to thn City wherever suitable alternative r access may be developed from vocal or collet- ;+ for streets o Where access must be granted to an arterial, : sold access shall be limited to one point.for r 300 feet of frontage or one point per parcel with less than 300 feet of frontage. It is _Q the Intent of the policy to establish a mi nl- ' t mum 300 foot spacing between driveways. .; II-19 ;`r ' PH Feak flour Intersection Vo ua Cast V/C Lane Additions* Haven /Foothill 1890 1500 1 26 Obla. left turns - -all approaches Haven /Arrow Route 1340 1500 0 89 Dble left turn lanes - -NB, YB Haven /4th 1470 1500 0.98 Dble left turn lanes - -4R; Sp Milliken /Foothill 1590 1500 1.06 Oble. left turn lanes - -flB; S8; an Milliken /Arrow Route 1200 1!00 0 80 Ohio left turn lanes - -NB; SS; ELI Milliken/4th 1500 1500 1 00 Rochester /Foothill 1440 1500 0.96 *Unless otherwise stated, all approaches are assumed to have one left turn and one right turn lane In addition to mid -block through lanes - Policies and Arterials 1f 45 _ r.�il As Table 11 -3 indicates, the Foothill /Haven Inter- section Is the most overloaded intersection in the City and Is expected to operate substantially above capacity Foothill /Mllllken Is expected to operate above capacity and Milliken /4th will operate Just at capacity A detailed presentation of all major Intersection lanes and right-of-way requirements Is presentr� n Figure 11 -5 Generally, each intersection Includes one separate left turn lane and as many through lanes as there are travel lanes upstream At some Intersections, double left turn lanes and /or a right turn lane may be necessary. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS POLICIES In order to ensure the effectiveness and capacity of arterlals, It w,il be necessary to establish and enforce rigid access control policies These controls are currently In effect under the pro- visions of the Planning Commission Resolution 78 -29 o Non access to all arterials shall be dedicated to thn City wherever suitable alternative r access may be developed from vocal or collet- ;+ for streets o Where access must be granted to an arterial, : sold access shall be limited to one point.for r 300 feet of frontage or one point per parcel with less than 300 feet of frontage. It is _Q the Intent of the policy to establish a mi nl- ' t mum 300 foot spacing between driveways. .; II-19 ;`r ' FIG.II -5 DIRECTIONAL LANE AND RO.W. REQUIREMENTS AT INTERSECTIONS FOOTHILL BLVD. ARROW ROUTE 6TH STREET r 4TH STREET 1 32 1 I Li F-• 3 7-43"1 � I'> , 2 3 1 13+1' 1 31 1 E1 y E- 2 r2 2: (l 1C� 1, 231 IS4, 1 31 �I � �L> � 4 2� Elrr> 1 -q, 1 3 1 132 21 /cI &y A,-3 3 —i Ifl TT), 1 231 1 5A HAVEN 2 1 121 4. -- 3- N 3 Ifi T 1-4, i 1 2 100' 2 1 I> 4- 2 2 i 12 100 2 1 Lj !r 3 1 a 3—� y T 12 tool Z F 3 1 CLEVELA ND / �D r'Y 1 32 1 Nay E-3 S2 0 2 J.. 1 �, 2 3 1 15d 1 3 1 1 Ljl E" 1 3 - 2 -�IhT� 14 131 1301 (�� y <--3 .C1 0 N 3 0 131 ma, w r w w r 1J1 3 - 34 1 d 31 tif ;1 MILLIKEN DIRECTIONAL LANE AND R.O.W. REQUIREMENTS AT INTERSECTIONS ROCHESTER 121 21 F.I�L> t-3 FOOTHILL `C I BLVD. 1 1 21 6 8� NEW ROCHESTER 1 -15 2 1 1 2 11 t 7TH .G- v E- 2 �-- z p STREET a 2 — 2 2 2� 22 6TH 04 G STREET N 1� i7iT 1 2 god 1 -15 2I� 11 I 4TH W �- 3 STREET N Q 3 3 I 2-4 2-j L� 2 1od a y % Y r • Combined access to arterials bet,.aen adjacent properties shall be encouraged wherever possi- ble to reduce the ntaber of enereachments • Ac:ess points shall, wherever possible, be lo- cated a minimum of 100 feet from t e back of curb returns at Intersections on 4 lane or wider highways • Mhere otherwise compatible with this policy, access shall be located opposite existing or planned points on the opposite slJe of the street. • In addition to the controls o,ltllned In Plan- ning Commission Resolution 78 -29, several addl- tional restrictions -4111 be necessary - Median Island breaks and left turn access should be linited to approxi- mately quarter mile spacings on the following major divided arterials: Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Fourth Street. Figure 11 -6 shows the recommended arterial Intersection s icing which will provide adequate storage lengths for left turn lanes - Signalized intersections should be spaced a minimum 1/4 mile apart to achieve adequate two-way progression - "P' intersections can be spaced not less than 940 feet apart and still provide left -turn entry and exit lanes on the arterials (except Haven, Foot- hill, Milliken, and 4th) as shown In Figure 11 -6 - For safety and efficlency, side fric- tion along major arterials should be minimized. Therefore, on- street park - Ing ,hould be eliminated, median ob- structions should be minimized, and left -turn movements ani access to drive- ways should be confined to designated location-. - Along Haven and Mlllikun. addltionsl access restrictions may be required due to traffic volume constraints. > > t PART Ili DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES I. INTRODUCTION The development standards and guidlines for tie in- dustrial Area Specific Plan of Rancho Cucanony. consist of three components: - Lad Use Types - Development Standards - Urban Design Standards and Guidelines The purp.:se of this section Iv to sstup rho sprclfic standards and guidelines which will be used for the oevelopment In the Industrial area Standards and guidelines are des'gncd to be compotible with the four major Land Use categories Variations of these standards are made depending upon a specific site cendltiois These variations are applied through special conditions within the nixteer subareas of the Industrial plan, as shown on Figure 111 -1 Mass subareas represent specific Land Use rharac- teriotics and development constraints which can be best deft with on a subarea basis rather than through the application of broadly applied develop- ment standards 111 -1 •' r N Mk !r n III -2 C:.,ta c oil■■ li. LAND USE TYPES There are 45 possible land use types within the In- dustrial plan area. Each subarea has a certain set of land use types based upon Its land use category and surround1m; conditions. Table 111 -1 lists the land use types by subarea. Definitions of these 1 land uses are In Table 111 -2 Permitted Uses Permitted uses are those land uses allowed In a given subarea subject to the development regulations of the Plan. Conditional permitted uses, because of their unusual site development requirements or unique operating char�cterlstirs, are subject to the ^ granting of a Conditional approval by the Planning Commission. Conditional Uses Projer . requiring a Conditional Use Permit sha!I be rnqulraa to comply with the regulations of section 61.0619(o) of the Zoning Ordinance. The Plannhig Coanlsslon shall make the follwoing findings before granting a Conditional Use Permit' 1. That a proposed use is In accordance with the 4eneral Plan, the Specific Plan, and the purposes of the Land Use category In -,hlch the project Is located , 2 Thcc toe proposed use, together with con- ditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety ' and welfare, or Injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinit, w ;. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions to the Specific '• r, Plan. i Mk !r n III -2 C:.,ta c oil■■ , u TABLE 111.1 SUMMARY LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA • PERMn-LED USE 0 OONDMO14ALLY PERMITTED USE LIScTYPES SUBAREAS 1 2 314 5 16 1718 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MANUFACTURING Custom • • • • • • • e • • • • • e Light Medium ❑ ❑ Cl e ❑ o • • • • • Iv9nimum Impact Heavy ':, • ' ;;:� Heavy 1 o • WHOIESALE STORAGF, DISTRIBUTION .,. -��•- Ught ,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,, e • o • • • • • • • • • • • i • A Hera ❑ Q • O C a ❑ • COMMERCIAL Administrative and Qt9C! dk4r,4+ • r IL'rZOi -m'C% 74 q, Ik yc A A J3 `I♦ ... M •_ ❑. N• M O� Agricultural Supplies and Serve= • • • • • • • • Animal Call. '�f7,Yih`illGi`Jhi .� r `i.`�,ii +in S�a.� �••.'•'.p l ;P Z. °j: � Automotive Fleet Storage O a G O Automotive Rental _. ; +( ,.iii a"'* Z • 9 ,;E Q ,P. a. ;�', • Q F AutomotivolU9hl Truck Repair • M4! • • ❑ a 0 0 • 0 e e 0 AUtornothu7nicklioar- Major., 11141 ' ' R Automotve Sates O o Automotive Sevlco Slfon- .;'^ ' • 0 . r ' ❑ ,e...w . ' n; D A T �C 3 Wading Contractoes Otflco and Yards • ❑ • ❑ ❑ • • • • BUnding Canuaclol6 Storage Yards ,iii >',:.�'.�" T•: • ' = •• ! ' : "i ,• :r v., - - • • . �., Bullding Maintenance Services s ra i' • • n 4; 0 •- a Building Supplies and Sales " ::'�i; ^,i�`ZCa`.' • Cl • 0 ❑ O O • • O • O ❑ Q • ❑ Business Suppy Retail Sales and Services • • • • • • • • s • • Business Support ServIca6 _I O • • ❑ • • • ❑ ❑ ' • • • • O • l Commuvcatbn SeMces • • • • • • 0 • e • • a • C mvenlence Sales and Services �Y.. ^'.z:i;{y i '0 ❑ O ❑ O ❑ O O O ❑ O ❑ O ❑ O ❑ Eating and Ddnktng Establishments • • • • a • • • • • • • • e e • En:erlainmerlt O ❑ .❑ ❑ Q 0 O "J Eztenshe Impact Commercial ❑ Fast Food _,a:r- .,4 + -•fi; "Y ^u_"er'Q.0❑❑PQ,000❑ - ❑0000❑ j Financial, Insurance and FAW Estate Services O O a • e 0 0 a • Food and Basses Sales ••,.- :;�.' +:.;; •Y p 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ❑❑ 0 0 0 0 0 ; Funeral end Crmnatory Semm ❑ Q C Heavy Equipment $ales and Rentab •.� ;•,'. ?.xy " 0 0 O 0 0 Cl 0 ❑ • Hotel /Motel • • • • Laundry Services • • Q • • • • MedlcallHealth Care Services C• •• 0 0 ,D 0 0 e Personal SBrvlcas ❑ O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Petroleum Products Storage G ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 Professional Services 0 • e • • PACMatbnal Facilities = _ G O O C .—. • O ❑ a I • • • • Repair SOnACe9 • • O O • • • • • • • O _ SCraa Operetl0n • CIVIC Adminlstrstive CMc Services • • • • e • • a • • Cultural ^ - ❑ ❑ - " C c FAeneAe Impact Utility Facilities 0 0 O ❑ O Public Assembty = _ = C = a z L6-- WWb Sa1My and UAL'ty Services ❑ 0 0 0 0 ❑❑(3 0 0 0❑ 0 0Ren�avemtxy nonmarked uses not permitted 1116 a a� bj'y. I* {�. .Ya1 � •��A ��'�''' ..+III -6', �. ? 1. �,�' `s�P:.�•{ by y+�•inr_.�� Sul ,y,�ryTr'lTr WvM _ _ J V, _ _, . .i,, i��„J. 2 - TABLE 111 -2 G , LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS ii Uses shown In Table Ill -I are defined as follows: .1 • A. NANO FACTOR ING USE TYPES Custom Manufactur : ln 'Activities typically Includn, k m gut not to .tnl manufacturing, processing, as- • :cabling, packaging,, treatment, or fabrication of �• custom -mado products such as Jewelry, furniture, art objects, clothing, Ins.ruments, and thi cn -ulte ' wholesale and retail of, the goods produced. Tha4, uses do not produce odors,•nolse,.vlbration, or, IL particulates which would adversely affect uses In ' the ame structure or an the same site. Uherc 24 f •• hours on -site surveillance Is necessary a caretakers residence may be permitted when approved by a Con- _ ,. ditlonal Use Permit. . LI ht Nanufacturtn : Activities typically Include, �L but +we mite tu, research, development laborator- ies, labor Intensive manufacturing, assembly, or i repair processes which do not Involve frequent truck a rail traffic (more than 4 truck trips - daily) or the transport of large scale products. The activitlas do not produce odors, noise, vibro- -� tlon, or particulates which would adversely affect other uses in the same structure or on the same, [ site. Where 24 hours on -situ surveillance is _ necessary a caretakers residence may be permitted IL, when approved by a Conditional Use.Permit. t -7+ Activities typically Include, ' + ,I 0 _Kad�lum_�Man�ufactu �ring;, But not t limited co, manufacturing, compounding of �^ materials, processing. assembly, packaging, treat - M' menc or fabrication of materials and products which r.—L t either require frequent truck or rail traffic, or the transport of heavy bulky Items Activities may ' produce noise, odors, vibrations, Illumination, or .r partiulaces that affect persons residing In or '•t .� conducting business In the ,vicinity. Where 24 , �+ hours on -sI to surveillance is necessary a caretakers 11 residence may be permitted khan approved by.a Conditional Use Permit ��'',tn�j', � •'S, L � �i' ,� . _lily'- i- '>:. bj'y. I* {�. .Ya1 � •��A ��'�''' ..+III -6', �. ? 1. �,�' `s�P:.�•{ by y+�•inr_.�� Sul ,y,�ryTr'lTr WvM _ _ J V, _ _, . .i,, i��„J. P` S y fitt: J- J J 4 C Minimum Im cav facturin ` oActivities typ ca y nct Me cau t manufactur- ing, compounding of material, prowssing, assembly, packaging, treatmart, or fabrication, activities which may have frequent rail or truck traffic or the transportation of heavy large scale products. Activities In this area may generate noise, odor, vibration, IltuminaticnI or particulates which may be ebnoxioua or offensive to persons residing or conducting business In the vicinity• Uses typical- ly Include but are not limited to; forge shops, metal fabricating facilities, open welding shops, woodworking facilities, heavy machine shops, eheml- cai storage and distributing, plastic plants, and light or vacuum casting facilities. Not permitted within this area are uses which require massive structures outside of buildings such as cranes or conveyor systems or unscreen open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi - refined, or finished products Where 24 hours on -site surveillance Is necesscry a caretakers residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Heavy Manufacturin c Activltl es typically Include uc not imlte co; manufacturing, compounding of material, processing,' assembly, packaging, n eat - ment, or fabrication Activities In this area may have frequent rail or truck traffic and the trans- portation of heavy largo scale products. Activi- ties In this area may generate noise, odor, vibra- tion, Illumination, or particulates which may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing In or conducting business In the vicinity Charactarls- tics of use activities permitted within 'his area may Include mt.sive structures outside of buildings such as cranes, conveyor• systems, cooling towers or onscreen open Or storage of large quantities of raw, semi- refined or finished products. Uses typically Include but not limited to; vehicular assembly plants, power plants, concrete product manufacturing activities, batch plants, scrap yards, air melding foundarles, and aggregate or asphalt yards Where 24 hours on -site surveillance is necessary a ca;etakers residence may be permit- ted when approved by a Conditional Use Pmrmlt. 111 -7 �1�i1 1 s. , -�. Aw,,.+r t, ,. t • y .�i.1, .. ,tit -. B. MOLESALE, STORAGE AIIO DISTRIBUTION USE TYPES ,a Llnht 4holosa ie, Store a and Distribution: .Activl- ties typ ca y ne u e,' ut not m ted to; whole-" L" s4110;, storage, and warehousing'sarvlces within ' enelobed buildings, storage and wholesale to re- } tapers from the premises of finished, goods and food prodduets. , Recall sales Prom the premises my 1° occur wheel approved as a Condl tional Use, whore 24 ! hours'on -sIie surveillance Is necessary a caretakers R. ' residence may be permitted -when approved by a 1 'a Conditional Use.Permit ,r He�av wholesale Stara a and Distribution: Activl- ��• t [ eTs typ u y nc u e, but are not m ted to; ' 'k warehodsing, storage, freight handling„ shipping, I� trucking services and terminals; storage and whole- �, soling fnsm the premises of unfI (shed, raw, or 1eml- reflned products requiring further processing, ;r fabrication or autnufactu ring. Typically us'4s In- cluda, but are not limited to; moving and storage 5 services, public worahousos,'trucking firms, auto- motive storage, areas,, and the wholesaling of metals, minerals and agrlcultural'products. Outdoor storage , Is permitted. where 24'hours on -site surveillance ' 1' Is necessary a caretakers residence may be permitted f when approved by a Conditional Use Permit h C. COHHERCIAL USE TYPES Administrative and Office: Activities typically ne u a, but are not IlmYtod to; executive manage- ' I' ment, administrative, or clerical uses of private, profit - oriented firms other than public utility L 9 firms. Uses typically Include, Ffut are not Iimlted to; corporate headquarters, branch offices, and1: data storage centers. Aerlcultural Supplies and Services- Activities typsl lyTnclu e, but are not limited to; the elf retail sale from the premlieo of feed and grain, �� •tt+ fottilixers, pesticides, herbicides, and similar goods. Uses typically Include, bct are not Ilml,ted to; feed and grain stores, wall drilling, and tree U,v sarvica firms. Animal Care: Activities typically Include, but are '�i �7 not limited to; the provision of animal are rreat- 1't! mans, and boarding services of large and small anl- ' ' j male 'so$ typically Include, but are not Ilmi tad 1` to; animal clinics, large and small unimal hojpltals; ,� and kennels. T` i ;,,'�.`1` S � - • 111 -8 � SY - r ° "�"., .iw,:'i �.d ' �. -.. �` Ji, 0 ti .}}y. In- ti Automotive Sleet Stores,: Activities typically vehi- e ode, ut era not ml tad to; the storage of i cles used requiarly In business operatlons and not, j oval labia for sale on site. Such uses typically Incl -ode, but not limited to; overnight storage of rental cars, mobile catering trucks, and taxi gabs. �. Automotive Rental: Activities typl rally Include, 1 ut are not m ted to; the rental from the premises of motor vehicles, with provision of Incidental - ma lntenance services. Uses typically include, but • are not limited to, car rental agencies. Automotive Sales: Activities typically include but not m to t 0-1h e dispray, retail sale, or rental, •-, sale, or rental of new and used automobiles, minor` automot Wv repair, automotive body work, and In- , Jt stallatlon of accassorles. v ,n putanotive and Light Truck Repair- NI�or: Aetivi- t es H1 u e, ut are not m to to; au tumotiva ' 'r and light truck repair, the retail sale of goods ,y and services for automotive vehicles and light «j trucks (less than 6000 lb), and the cleaning and washing of tutomotIve vehicles Use.i typically In- clude, but are not limited to; brake, muffler and the shops and automotive drive - through car washes. 4� Heavier automobile repair such as transmission and engine repair art not Included Automotive and Truck Repair -Ha or- Activities typ- ca y nc u at but are not I m ted to; hesvy auto- " mobile and truck repair such as transmission and i r engine repair, the palnting of aatMOtIVO vehicles, automotive body work, and the Iris calla tion of major, _ accossorles. Automotive Service station: Activltles "tYpically ` nc u e, u: are not Imlted to; the sale from the premises of goods and the provision Of sarvrce i J normally required nt h he day -to -day operation of - motor vehicles, including the principal sale of - ,.., petroleum products, the Inca dental sale of tiros, J batteries, replacement Items, and lubricating serv- Ices, and the performance of minor repairs, such as' tune -up, tire change and brake work. r 1 . N� v r_ Bull l ldin i Contractor's Offices antl Yards: Activities ' CYP ca y nc ude o cos an storage of equipment, materials, and vehicles for contractors who are in, the trades Involving construction activitle4 which '^ Include, but are not limited to, plumbing, palnt- Ing, electrical, roofing, carpentry, and other services Bulldln Contractor's Sta�rag_e Yard: Activities In- e u e tha ma ntenan;a an od ucdoo� storage of large construction equipment such as earthmoving equip- ment, cranes, and out -door storage or building materlcals In an unau:reened manner Bulid in Nalneerwnee Services: Activities typical - y nc u e, cut era not lifted to; maintenance and custodial services, window cleaning services, disinfecting and exterminating services, and jani- torial services 11 11- Buc e typically Sup bu o ne, ud t not limited to; the retail sale or rental fron the premises of goods and equipment, Inc luding paint, glass, hardware, fixtures, elactrl- cal supplies and lumber and hardware stores; and may have outdoor storage where allowed. :• IF Business Sunni Retail and Services: Ac tivitles typically nc u e, ut ore not m ted to; retail sales, rental or repay from the prom lass of office equipment, office supplies and similar office goods primarily to firms and other organizations utiliz- Ing the goods rather than to Individuals. They ex- clude tlse sale or rental of motor vehicles and the sale of materials used In construction of buildings ' or other .turctures. Business Support Services: Activities typically ne u o, but are not m ted to; firms rather than Individuals of services of a clarical, employment, ' protective, or minor processing nature, Including multi -copy and blue -print services. They exclude the prinring of books, other than pamphlets and I" smal, reports for another firm. F1,... - '��nh2, • ..• II1 -10 : :tai �,,4••na.7,r. M,l.^ r. T' Communication Services: Activities typl catty in- c u� de. but sere not mlted to; broadcasting and _ other Information relay services atcompllshed prl- marlly through use of electronic and telephonic mechanisms. Uses typically Include, but are not limited to; television and radio smidlos and tele- graph offices. :. Convenience Sales and Services: Activities typ- ca y ne u e, ut are not mi ted to the retell I ales from the premises of frequently needed small pa rsonai conven;anca Items and professional serv- Ices which are used frequnntly. Uses typically Include, but are not limited to; drug stores, stores selling toiletries, tobacco, and magazines, beauty and barbor shops, and apparel laundering and try clrining agencies. i° Ea tin and Drinking Establlshments: Activities - TYp ca y nc u a, but are not FFmIted to; the retail sale from the premises of food or beverages prepared for on- premises consumption. Uses typl- call! include, but are not Ilulted to; restaurants and bars; excluding fast food type services. Entertal mint: Activities typically Include, but - are not TTm r ed to; cultural, educational, and ' entertainment services within an enclosed building to assembled groups of spectators of participants, - as wall as activities typically performed at pri- vate and non - profit clubs and lodgas. Uses typ- ;, Ically lneluda, but are not limited to; dance halls, theaters and meeting halls. Extensive Im act Cammrreial: Acblvltles typically nc ude, but are not mitad to; those which pro- . duce or may produce a substantial Impact upon the �! surrounding area. Uses typically include, but are not limited to amusement park, " ova -In novlo theaters, flea markets, outd a sales, or • swap meet activities 5 {P. Fast Food Sales: Activities which may Include but are not m to to the retail sale from the pram - Ise$ of easily prepared foods end beverage, such ' as; hamburgars, hotdogs, chicken, and tacos for either on -site or off -site consumption. Uses may Include, but are not limited to drive -In type restaurants .. III -I1 �,35 l C x4 �iy. { B M k>jv 4 Financial. Insurance and Rral Estate Serv,ces: t v c es, typically nc u e, but are no! sited to; financial, Insurance, real estate and securi- ties brokerage services. Food and Oevuro oo Sales: Activlrl" include, but IL are.n— of Illted to tne retail sale fro: the prem- ises of .food and beverages for off- premisos con- sumption. Uses typically Include, but are not limited to; mini- a.erkets, llquc• stores and retail I4 bakeries; bAcluding choln type grocery stores. Funsral and Cremator Ser•Ices: Activities typl- IL ea y ne u a, ut ire not invited to services in- volving the care, preparation, and dispostlon of human dead other than In cemeteries. Uses typl- I� cally Include, but are not limited to; funeral hares, crematories, and mausoleums. I' Hotel /Motel: Activities typically Include, but are not I mTTced to lodging services to; transient guests an a lass - than - monthly basis, other than In the case of uses classified as residential uses. Uses typically Include, but are not limited to; hotels, motels, boarding houses and resorts. r 'L Neavy Eavl nt Sales and Rentals: Activities typ- ca y .nc ude, ut are not limited to; the sale or rental from the premises of heavy construction 0qufpment, farm equipment, trucks and aircraft together with ma lntenance. Uses typically include, but are no' limited tol aircraft, farm equipment, heavy truck, large boat (over 25'1 and heavy con- struction equipment dealers. Laundry Services: Activities typically Include, ut arc not mitnd to; Institutional or commercial {_ linen supply and laundry services, dry cleaning plants, rug cleaning, and diaper service laundries. Medical /Health Care Services: Activities typically " nc u a, but are not Imited to therapuetie, pre- �• ventative, or correctional personal treatment by physicians, dentists, and other proctitioners, as well as the provision of medical tasting and analy- 5Is services Health taro uses typically Include tense performed by: I.: ^v - Hedlcal Clinics.{=�1 - Family Planning Clinics, - In- Patlent Health Care Facilities, -Li•4 Includlrg hospitals. • � "• .h, "•s� is "rf� n�' :, :...:x: �'S �a i• S, y� c F711111111 i" a a . T' e u ■ i� Personal Services: Activities typically Include, cat are not mated to; Information, Instruction and similar services of u personal nature. Uses typically Include, but are not limited to driving schools, day care facilities, travel bureaus, and photogrrphy studios. Petrol! :sa Prcducts Stora��--a--: Activities typically' Inc u a, ut are not limited to; bulk storage, sale, and distribution of gasollne, Ilqulfled pe- troleum gas, and other petroleum products Professionnl Services: Activities typically In- c uda, ut are not TTmited to; the rrovlslon of advice, design, Information, or consultation of a professional nature. Uses typically Include, but are not limited to architect's, engineer's, law- yer's, and accountant's offices, and of planning or educational research services. Recreational Facilities: Activities typically In- c u e, but are not m ted to; sports performed either Indoors or outdoors which require a facility for conducting the recreational activity. Uses typically include, but are not limited to; swimming centers, skating rinks, bowling alleys, tennis courts, sports fields, and golf courses Repair Services: Activities typically Include, but are not limited to repair services Involving arti- cles such as upholstery, furniture, and large electrical appliance repair services. Scrap Operation: Activities typically Include, but are -not m ted to the storage, and sale from the premises and /or dismantling of used or waste mate- rials except when such activities are parr, of a manufeeturing operation D. CIVIC USE TYPES Administrative Civic: Activities typically In- cTu`je,-1iut are not limited to; management, ad- ministrativa, or clerical services performed by public, quasi - public, and public utility adminis- trative offices f.I, 1 IS r III -13 � I y •! 1 i L 3 ° INNER„i L Cultural: Activities typically include, but are not m ted to those performed by the following Institutions: L - Public and private non - profit museum and art galleries; r - Public and private non -prof t Itbraries L and observatories. r Extensive Impact Utllit Facilities: Activities I` typ ca y Inc u o, but are not limited to those performed by public agencies or which are strongly r vested In the public interest, and which produce or L may produce a substantial Impact upon the surround- ing area. Uses typically include, but are not limited to the following Institutions and Installa- tions: - Irrigation and other canals - Datentloi and correctional institutions - Electric, gas, and oil trar:misslon facilities - Gsrbage or refuse disposal faclt ;ties - kajor mall- processing centers - Radio and television transmission faclll- I ties, Including but not limited to booster t or :slay staticns - Railroad and bus terminals - Railroad rlghts -of -way, railroad yards and bus storage areas Public utility corporation t,r truck yards - Reservoirs, water tanks, and water treatment (` facilities L - Sewage treatment facilitler and truck lines exclusive of Individual septic tanks _ - SCAam, fossil, or niclear parer plants C - Truck terminals ope ,*aced by a public agency bl Pubiit Aszem r Activities typically Include, but r �. sra noC im to to; those performed by, or at, the following Institutions or Instailations: - Parks, botanical gardens, and open space C �� areas of a passive use character: - Public and semi- publle playgrounds and play - Ing 'lelds, and open space areas of an ae- .F I tiva use character; - Public and saml- public meeting halls'• t 3 ° INNER„i aaaaff m Ill. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The Development Standards within the Industrial area address seven factors which include: - General Provisions - Minimum Parcel Size - Setback Requirements - Landscape Requirements - Parking B Loading Requlrements - Pail Service Standards - Performance Standards Table Ill -3 summarizes the appllea tlon of develop- ment standards which may apply on a subarea.basls, Including minlsmrn parcel size, landscape require- ments; perfornance ruquirements, and rail service standards. The setback requirements are determined In accordance with the street classification. TABLE 111 -3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUMMARY STANDARDS 1 2 3 415 6 1 7 8 9 1101111 121131141 15 16 n 1 n Imam Parcel S ze (Acres) } 1 } } 1 2/1 2/1 } 512 1 } 2/1 } } 5 1 1lnimum % t of Landscape Area (2 of Net Lot Area) 12 10 12 1217 15 11; 12 10/5 10 12 15 12 12 10/5 15 rarformence ScheduleI B B B DIB A A 0 B/C 8 8 A B B C A call Service X X I X X X A. General Provisions The purpose of standards within General provisions Is to establish minimum standards regulating speclf- Ic details In the development of any project within the Industrial Area. The standards set fortn In this section shall apply either within the entire Industrial area or where stated by the Land Use i eetagory • 111 -15 t • t �• r ` S Signs A.1 Signs shall he usad for the purpose of Iden- tlflcgtlon and directlon. The design of permitted signs shall be architecturally in- tagrated with the building design. Tie, consideration of Identification and direr- • tional signs Including the location, materl- ' ols, colors, copy and the method of-signing,, size, and cons•ructicn details are all set forth In Chapter .4 of the City Code and contained In the "mppendix D to this plan. Lighting A.Z. Lighting shall be used for the purpose of providing Illumination for the security and safety of on -site areas such $,a parking, 'loading, shlppinn and receiving, pathways, y and working areas. The fall^Ing standards shalt apply in all areas: a a The design of-light fixtures and its structural support shnil be arehtteetur- • alty compatible with the surrounding buildings. b. Parking let lighting fixtures shall have an overall height not exceeding 151. c. Walkway lighting fixtures shall have an overall height not exceeding 121. d. Security lighting fixtures are not to `;• project above the fascia or roof line of the bulldlnq. , • e. All lighting Is to be shielded to confine light spread within the site boundaries. Particular concern shall be for lighting _ adjacent to residential areas.. a Equipment Screening A.3 The purpose of Equipment Screening standards .t shall be to allow for the use of equipment while preserving the architectural character and integrity of the surrounding snvlronment. The follow Ing standards shall apply according to Land Use cotegoryt a All roof and grwnd mounted equipment shall be screened from public view on ' all sides within all land use categor- ies except minimum Impact heavy Indus- trial and heavy Industrial r ` 9 � rx �` �I r.r•ww �. ^may.^. b. Wherever possible, all roof and ground mounted equipment around view of main building area shall be screened from public view within the minimum Impact haovy Industrial and heavy industrial categories. C. All screening shall be architecturally Integrated with the building design and where possible a roof parapet wall shall be used to screen roof mounted equipment. Refer to Section IV "Architecture and Design Standards" for further information. The purpose of storage area regulations 13 :a allow for on -site storage which is architac- tu rally canpatible with the surrounding an- vlrormeni, The fol hwing standards shall apply according to Land Use category: a. Within the Industrial Fork utegory no outdoor storage shall be permitted except for (]act vehicles and light trucks (not exceeding 6,0oo lb-1.) Oucdoor storago tanks may be permitted at a height not to exceed 8' from h!ghest finish grade when screened from public view by cun- cr.c: masonry or other similar materials b. Within the General Industrial or General Industrial /Rail Served categories all materials, supplies, equipment and oper- atlna trucks shall Ne stored within an enclosed building or a screenee area from oublle view C. Within the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial and Heavy Industrial categories all mate- rials, supplies, equipment and operating traeea shall be stored within an enclosed building or a storage area Such storage areas shall bn ssrcened within 120' of front property line d Within SCO' of the Devore Freeway rlght- of -way all outdoor storage shell be screened from public view from the Da•ore Freeway Screenina the Devore Freeway may cons,der the use or combination of blosk or masonry wall, berming, dense landscap- Ing, or building mass. ' e. Within alp Land Use categories exeepk Heavy Industrial, all storage area screen- Ing shall be by concrete, masonry r other similar materials not to exceed a ft 1- r+ height of OR from highest finish grade. f. Within the Heavy Industrial category L storage area screening may Include masonry b m' concrete, wood, metal, or chain link with wood slats. g. Storage of materials or equipment shall not exceed screen height within lop' of street fronting screens ` h The Cl y Planner may waive screening re- quirements where future building expan- - sion would screen abutting storage area Utilities A.5 The Purpose of J[111 [y Service standards Is for the efficlent distribution of utilities designed to be compatible with the surround - Ing environment The following requirements shall apply within the Industrial area: L ` a All existing and new utilities less than 12KV within the Hroject and along adjacent I major arterials shall be installed under- ground. b All ground mounted utility appurtenants C such as transformers shall be located out 'If public v!ew of the main building area (' and adequa•ely screened through the use L or Combination of concrete or masonry walls, bermir,g, landscape and nw to rtals. B Minimum Parcel Size The purpose of o Minimum Parcel Size is to minlmu [n establish m lot - size standardr which will for tlle development and use of land within the Industrl- al area according to the Land Use category and dove lopment standards contained within th's Plan. The Minimum Parcel Size Is , determined by a Land Use category with role excretion of portions of subareas 6. 7. and 12. These are described more fully In _ Part IV of this Plan �r Ye i n V t�� III-IA Lot Size The Minimum Parcel Size shall be setforth as follows: 1' Minimum Paresl Land Use Category Size (Acres) a Industrial Park 2a /1 b General Industrial } c General Industrial Rail- served 1 i; d. Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial 5/2" e. Heavy Industrial 5 • 2 acres minimum parcel size in sebareas 6, 7, and 12 on parcels adjacent to 4th Streit, Haven Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard. +a 2 acres minimum parcel size In subarea 9 between Arrow Highway and 1000' south. 5 B 2. Minimum Parcel width shall be not less than 100', and not less than 200' on parcels abutting Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and 4th Street Condominium Lots B j. Condominium lots and lots within an approved Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size requirements 0 4. All lots of record are allowed to develop according to development standards as set. forth In this Plan C Setback Reeulrements The purpose of Setback Requirements is to provide open space for building separation, landscape treatment, and the encouragement of architectural design diversity A steeetscape setback is the distance from street frontage where building is prohibl ted The following standards shall apply In all areas of the Plan: C.1 All street frontage setbacks are determined from ultimate face of curb i, C 2. Streetscape setbacks Include both minimum +; landscape and minimum building setback re- quirements and are considered coincidental .�� along street frontages. ty W 7A _ . ✓ Building Setback Streetscapa Setback O C C.3 Buildmodl setback, shall be as follows (exec through C 6); ze[forth in items C 4 a Front: As shown per street classl- Ilon b. Interior None a Rear Abuttln Street: As shown per street c asst cation. d. Interior (In ter Z None. e. Street Side: As shown per street C d33 Wt10 n. C.4, Properties d C5 C6 C. 7. C8 r she ll lave a jacent to residential areas from property IF" on Interior) let n line tendk 45' from ultlmato face of curbs on abutting streets. Areas of other land use categories abutting an Industrial Park category shall have a minimum of 45' building setback to the abutting Property line on Interior lot line and 45' from ultimate fpce of curb on abut- ting streets. For buildings exceeding two (2) stories or 35' as measured from highest finish grade, which ever Is more restrictive, an addition- al " setback measured from ultimate face of curb shall be requ.red for each additional 70' height. This setback need not exceed Along Special Boulevards as shown On Figure 111 -2 streetscapes shall be a minimum aver- age of 45' from ultime to face of curb, except an Indicated in C B. Streatscape setback requirements shall be establl$hed accordinn to $treat classifica- tion as Shown In Table III -4 and as shown an Figure 111 -3 streetscape setback schedule. However, an Specie' Boulevards, the sCreet- stape setback need not exceed an average depth, equal to 208 of the depth of the Property as measured from ultimate fa ce of curb, provided that it is not less th Parking setback depth an the I[ I[ (C 1[ f� L r- r- c =� ..rw C P VONV O7 _ I om I U C7 1 N3LS3Fi�0 f I �� - a I - U a ! cn i P i � I I I I 1 j QNEHDl1V I vv)) ; i j I I ?'• Nd' i : I _ y41Y 4 FiG. Su-3 STREETSCAPE SETBACK SCHEDULE MAJOR ARTERIAL /SPECIAL BLVD. (100*and 120 ft, ROW) s Day Creek Blvd o Foothill • Haven s Milliken • 4th •.6th between Haven & Devora • • row* Archibald* • New Rochester • Etiwaada SECONDARY /SPECIAL BLVD. (88 M ROW) • 6th (West of Haven) '-t 4n 121 IW aaR MM unacY h.w r.L .nn �yunay. //.M uaut ;.t •�. �e 10 C .- C (C L i RI �C I �C l �C 1�J .4 Ft' I,,, SECONDARY (74 & 88 ft. ROW) 1 See vbarea 15, special consideration LOCAL INDUSTRIAL (54 ft. ROW) ->� • Vineyard 1 • Hellman • Cleveland • 6th East of Devore • Turner • Je:sey (80' R.O.W.) 1 See vbarea 15, special consideration RA! , �U7 LOCAL INDUSTRIAL (54 ft. ROW) • 8th • 9th • center _ • Santa Anita ®1 • (Old) Rochester a.+ �T • 7th West of Haven , ... _..._..__._.. ^o YK ' N M�t l .,k hM LL l6RQhnl¢ro. Y YA aa0Cd10lNW RA! , �U7 K - v It 1-24 1 _ t , TABLE 111 -4 STREETSCAPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Oetem ined from Ultimate Face. of C6rb •• A Average Landscape end Perking ._ Building Setback Setback Majur Arterial and ^ Special Boulevard 45' 25' -' Secondary 35' 20' Local 25' 15' Parking Setbacks C C 9 Parking Setbacks as yetforth In Table 111 -4 .•• may be included within the streetscape satback provided that the average landscape - setback is ma lntalned according to the street classification 0 Landscape Reauirenents ^ The purpose of landscaping Is to provide the Indus- ^ trial area greater aesthetic quality, a unified architurally theme, and promote energy conservation. The following requirements shall be applied through- out the Industrial area. ^ Minimum Landscape D D.I. The minimum landscape coverage of net lot Coverage a area (net lot area Includes the area under _ property ownership excluding all rlght -ef- way dedications and private streets) is as follows: Subarea 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 %Landscape - - Coverage 12 10 12 12 7 7 15 15 12 10e /5 10 12 15 12 12 10 *5 15 a Within Subareas 9 and 1 15, the minlmum landscape coverage shall be 10% of net lr.e .-ea between the B Brea exte, ding from Arrow Nlghway, 1000' south. _ All ,ema lning area shall h have a 5 •Inlmm landscaped coverage It 1-24 1 _ t , Berm l ng Trees Irrigation System III -25 • MINI D.2 The landscaped coverage requirement may be modified by the Planning Commisslon when it Is detrrmined that the project Is designed to the hignest aesthetic quality compatible with the land use Category and consistent with the surrounding land use. (I e. within a Master Planned project area, variation of landscape coverage requirement may be allowed ) D 3 Bermed landscaping shall be Incorporated wherever poss Ible within the landscape set- back and landscape areas surrounding parking and loading areas. 0.4 On Special Boulevards, all parking areas will nave berms an average height of three foot and have a maximum slope not to excoed 3} :I D 5• The design of the berms shall be undulating to provide Interest and visual access to buildings. D 6 All rigoired trees will be a minimum of 15 gallon size D 7 Within parking lots, trees will be planted at a rate of I tree for every 3 parking stalls provided In the planters 0 8. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to structures at the equiva- Ient of 1 tree per 30 linear fuel of build - Ing dimensions 0 9. All landscaped areas shall be served by an automated irrigation system D.10. Property owners will be responsible for the development and malntanance of landscaping their cn -site landscaped area and for the contiguous planted right -of -way. Any damage to the landscaping and Irrigation systens shall be planted or replaced within thirty (30) days from date of damage. D 11 The use or combination of berming, landscape ma terlels, low level wall, and be lding mast shall he used to screen parking and loading areas, and refuse collection areas from the J; public view. , III -25 • MINI H f. IF D 12 The following Is a list of acceptable land- seeping ma feria is for low level screening: BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Size at Height x 3 Years Width Minimum Spacing Buxus Japonicum Japanese Boxwood 5' x 4' 3 0' c. Carlsa grandiflora Natal Plan 5' x 4' 3.5' a Coprosma bauerl Corrosma 6' x 5' 3 5- o.c Hakea suaveolens Sweet Hakea 6' x 5' 4 0' o.c Hibiscus rosa- sinensis Chinese Hibuscus 5' x 5' 5.0' o e Ligustrum texanum Japanese Privet 6' x 4' 3 0' o c. Myoporum laetum Myoporum 6' x 6' 5 0' o c. Herium oleander Oleander 6"x 6' 4.0' o.c. Pittosporam tabira T)bira 3' x 4' 4 0' o.e Viburnum Japonicum Viburnum 6' x 5' 4.0' o c. Xylosma eongestum Xylosma 5' x 5' 4.0' o.c. O.C. D.13 In order to achieve a unifona landscape theme, the areas within the street medians, park strips, and streetscape setbacks shall have an established landscape materials pallet consistent with the City's landscap- ing theme Table 111 -5 describes the land- scaping materials and characteristics per street classification. E Parking a Loading 4eguirements In order t, prevent traffic congestion, promote business and enhance public safety; off street parking and loading facilities shall be provided as sec forth herein. The facilities required by this section for parking and maneuvering of motor vehi- cles are assumed to be the minimum standard neces- sary for such use. The follcw Ing shall apply for the Industrial area: E 1 Parking standards within the Industrial area shall be those set forth In the Zoning Ordinance, Section 61 021 and contained with the Appendix E of this plan. E 2 Required parking shall be located on the same site with the main oso of the building, or on premises contiguous thereto, or In a location in accordance with an approvod development plan. 111 -26 r I x - 4 � iW .� }E .q ! � � \ ea §�, : � ! \� \\ !e t2 |# g 2 |�| ! !; |\ \!J! ;H , �! A |� � £, §! / / � / \| HM ) \�! �| ! � q� � � LLI Q 2 0 ! Q � � . LIJ « � 2 � Q ■ . � 2 « � ! , h R s � 6q � ƒt� § , f� §\ �! /!! \� § \ hf a 1111 !i d b! !� | \ / D5- a � . /�; A. Parking Spaces Required E j Req,(Ired parking spaces shall be de:-ermined at the following rates: a Warehousing or building for storage: I space for 1,000 square feet b Industrial /Manufacturing: 1 space per 500 square feet ' c. Office and Administration: I space per 250 square feet d. Multi -use tenant where office use does not exceed 35% of building area or 115paee"4Outldi ngs: I space per 400 square feet E.4. 20% of all required parking stalls shall be devoted to compact car use. Minimum stall dimension shall be 8' in width and 16' -in length and marked for compact cars. E 5 All Parking areas shall be screened from public view through the use of berms, land- scaping material and low walls E 6 All loading facilities and maneuvering areas Lo. DOCK twoaq DOCK must to on site with the use E All loading 7 facilities shall be permitted only In the rear and Interior side yard areas except within the Heavy Industrial i category, and rall served buildings E 8 Aisle width to loading docks shall be a marking of 50' width exclusive of truck parking area E.9 Loading docks shall be setback o minimum of 70' from street property line. E.10 Loading facilitt es shall he adequately screened from the publle view except within the Heavy Industrial category and Rail Served buildings. , E 11 Minimum aisle width adjacent to loading areas shall be 16' one way and 28' for two way t i Y r'at:� >S3 , F Rail Service Standards The purpose of Rail Service Standards Is to provide for the use of Rail Service to certain subareas within the Industrial area Uscs with dependency on Rail Service -hail be encouraged to locate with subareas 2, 5, 9, 10 and 15. F.1 Rail service standards, as set forth In - Appendix L, are suggested guidelines for developing rail access The railroad and the PUC may consider modification of track standards, therefore the project designer , should consult with the railroad at the time of project deslen. F.2 Lot divisions and building layouts within subareas 2, 5, 9, 10, and 15 shall be done In manner to ensure for full potential future rail access and should not preclude rail access to other properties within the subarea. F 3• Within portions of subareas 6 snd 11, rail _ access is parmitted under condition that adeq�,ate screening Is provided for non -rail service areas. Refer to Part IV Subareas 6 and 11 or this Plan for further detail C Performance Standards The purpose of Performance Standards Is to establish Industrial Use Standard characteristics which allow ' the uses to operate consistent with the overall characteristics of the Land Use category' This section bases Its determl nation on land use charac- teristics of each category The Intent of the Per- formance Standards is to provide for a healthy, cafe, end pleasing enviroment In keeping with the nature and level of surrounding Industrial ectivity. The Performance Standards contained with Table 111- 6, are applied on a subarea basis as follows: Class A - 6, 7, 12, 16 ' ^lass 9 - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14 Class C - 9, 15 , CLASS A Performance Standards Is the most restric- tive of the Performance Standards It is r.;;lzed for the Industrial Park Category. u -k� J if on 111-30 �.[.. �� - . -yam _•T .il_ rr ._ .. - -n• -- ; ra .1 r- .:r�e:Y`:r.w .;;!F' •. . - :.e *. ,,�,ty,., h @.'- .}';!+} a al. r • , a fk�i I 'CLASS B Performance Standards are emphyed for the y •Ganeral'Industrial. Category These standards are Intended to provide for the broadest range of In- dustrial activity while assuring for a basic level, t environmental protection. ti CLASS C performance Standards provide for a level ' of Industrial activity associated with the Heavy , ndustrial use while providing safeguards. 11'. URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES - � The establishment of Urban Design standards and t guidelines provides the City with the ability to ensure that all development In the Industrial Area has comparible architecture and enhanced design quality. The guidelines are'general and through, the Design Review procuss are Intended to encourage the Individual creativity of project designers as well as provide for the needs of the individual owner and user A. Architecture and Design The purpose of Areniteeture and Design standards and guidelines Is to ensure that the built an- vlronmant within the Industrial area Is compatible with the nature and use of each Lard Use category The standards and guidelines are Intended to result In a well designed environment which Is safe and pleasing to w rk within. The standards and guide- lines shall apply on an area wide basis and where noted within certain Land Use catz9ories 7 A.1 The design of buildings and surrounding environment should be compatible with !� surrounding land use and architecture, and Should recognize the climzte, the physical setting, and the best architectural tradi- tions of Southern California A.2. Ali exterior wall elevation: of bulld'ngs and screen walls -hail have archltecutural treatment, compatible with the surrounding lama use and architecture A.3 Colors, materials, and finishes shall be coordinated in all exterior elevations of the buildings to achieve a total continuity r ' of design ti r,.. u1 -33 a5S .�,.,_y� r � -.. .. � ��4� � y�; C- ... y .i :Y • .�i'Y "WY �yI `i�11 �� .�l 1 A.4 Building materials, colors, and textures i shall be coppatible with those of adjacent ' •�vit, ;!•� or nearby but dings ^7 Meta tidings A.5. The use of prefab, all metal steel for + �` sheathing of buildings Is prohibited from ` the Industrial Park category. This Is riot + to preclude the use of, metal detail within a , 8 rchltecturally design ad buildings such as ' "CdrtIn'1 steel Where used, me tat buildings g shall be architecturally designed to be 1 xmpatlble wlth the Land Use category Screening A.6. All screening from public view within the Industrial Plan, General Industrial, General _ Industrial /Rail Served Land Use categories; ' such as storage spaces, loading docks, and .� equipment shall be arch l tecturul + v Integral- ad with the surrounding bulldle,j design through the use of concrete, masonry, or • other similar materials, not to exceed a height of 8' from the highest finisned _ grade A.7. Screening within the Heavy Industrial Land, Use category shall be within 120' of fr.int property line Such screening may include masonry, wood, metal or chain link fence . with wood clots. n _ A.B. Development at the cornrr of Foothill and 1 Haven shall be designed In scale and archi- tecture compatible with nearby historical f buildings. - Height and Bulk A 9. The height and bulk of buildings shall not , unduly block views and the solar access of edjacen• and other nearby buildings A 10 Puilding placement shall be designed In such ..`.j a way to create opportunities for plazas or other landscaped open spaces and encourage defined and spaciously enclosed open space oa the same site or adjoining sites.' A.il Maximum building or structure height shall •, 1•_��, not exceed four stories or 74' which aver Is greater, unless approved or a Conditional Use Permit sk p ♦ pia. • ' j'� yr ,.t r .. 111 -34 JR% .�, �\ ar rr.n :C e$1,tt Street Furr cure d A.12. -At ground level, expanses of blank building walls shall be minimized with encouragement , of arch i taatural embellishment within the - structures. • 9.. Open Spaces + The purpose of Open Space standards and guidelines ' Is to ensure for a safe and pleasing environment .� which will enhance the building architecture of the surrounding environment. It Is the Intent of the standards and guidelines to provide for a pleasing experience to those who may pass through tho area. The following standards anJ guidelines shall apply throughout the Industrial area. B.I. Ope, ,paces shall be.integrated with pedes- trian walks and deflaed by landscaping and ^rher elements to create a sense of place. , B 2. ,Loggias, colonades, and other structures that provide shade to open areas shall be utilized whenever possible. 0.; The landscape design of open spaces shall be harmonious with the design of the buildings ` on the site and shall enhance their appearance. B 4 , Where posslble.,open spaces shall be accessi- ble to the public and equipped with benches and other seating. 1 1. . B 5. Benches, light standards, kiosks, trash receptacles, and other street furniture in on -site open spaces shall be designed In a coordinated fashion to enhance the appearance and function of the site and open space 5.6 All gateway entryways to the City shall be landscaped In accordance with the City's landscape theme - C. Pedestrian and Bicycle Fsclittles' The purpose of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities standards and guidelines Is to ,,ovide for the use of those activitl -- within and around the Industrial area the standards and guidelines shall apply throughout the Industrial area. nnn , Sri .fi n Ct ;z .. ■ Pedestrian Facilities C.I. Pedestrian walks through open spaces and accesswnys to buildings shall be required In order to shorten walking distances. C 2 At street level, the use of building materi- al, and building details, that relate to huma.i activity shall be required. C.j Pedestrian areas shall be highly visible and well lit. C.4. Bicycle storage facllit!es shall he provided wi•.hin all development aort relate to planned and existing bicycle routes. Bicycle and Other Two C 5. required on -site parking may be reauced at a wheel Vehicular Facilities rate of one automobile parking space per 4 spaces of bicycle or other two wheel vehicu- lar parking up to three automobile parking spaces or 5t of total requires on -site park- ing, whichever Is less. III -36 .7 ITQ T= T T T T T T 7 1� 7� 7- 7 :�= 7.b f i C ,jr;+yiYi ^ i . 6 SUBAREA I General Plan Designation Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial ^ Primary Function This subarea extends from Arrow Route soutn to • • ATaSF tracks, cast of Haven and west of Devore Freeway Including Industrial I users south of ATaSF tracks west of Oevore Freeway. The subarea Is traversed by the ma In line of AT65F railroad an the south with several rail spurs serving the subarea. Substantial portions of the area around Jersey Avenue are developed with both median and soma heavy Industrial users. . The function of this subarea Is to provide for the s, continuation of the axlsting uses and to provide the opportunity of the expansion of manufacturing " and warehousing activity similar and compatible with the existing uses ' Permitted Uses Medium Manufacturing Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Manufacturing Heavy Manufacturing Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Building Supplies and Sales Eating and Drinking Establishments Repair Services Coneltlonal Uses Business Support Services Communication Services Convenience Sales and Services Fast Fond Food and Beverage Sales - Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals Petroleum Products Storage Recreational Fa(A litlas - Extensive Impac Utility Facilities Public Safety and Utility Services ' Access and Circulation 120' Right -Of -Nay - Milliken " 1 U I17 11 .12 1111121 tdt]• U• 1 • - t n ` b IV -44 A,. as9 a 1U 1 so 4 SUBAREA 9 (Continued) 1001 Right -Of -Nay - Rochester r C Arrow ` JY Raw 881 Right -Of -Way - Cie viand Jersey r• 541 Right -Of -Nay - 7th K Vincent 7 Utica and all other local streets 'i e'.• 4 SIL ti Minimum Parcel Size Two (2) acres In the area between Arrow Highway .. Setback Requirements (Measured from ulti- mate face of curb) e•. extending 10001 south, five (5) acres In remaining areas Milliken Arrow Rochester Cleveland Jersey 7th 8th 9th Vincent, Utica, and all other local streets 1,. IV -47 Average Landscaping Parking 451 25' „ n rr n 35' 20' 25• t5' r. .r rr r n n n rr r_ - SUBAREA 9 (Continued) Landscape Requirements 10% of the net lot area In the area between Arrow (- Highway extending 1000' south s, 5% of the net lot area in the remaining area I- Performance Requirements Noise: The maximum allowable nalso level of any use shall not exceed 85Ldn as measured at the lot line of the lot containing the use. Where a use is within 700 feat of residentially zoned land, the noise level shall not exceed 65Ldn. Where a use occupies a lot abutting or separated by a street from a lot within the designated Class A or 0 performance standard or residential property, the Performance standard of the abutting property shall r apply at the common or facing lot line. L i Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as not to i generate vibration discernible without Instruments by the average person beyond 600' from where the I source Is located. Vibration caused by motor vehi- cles, trains, and temporary construction and demoll- tion Is exempted from this standard. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addi- tion to cop I•Tnce 77th the AQMO standards, all uses shall be oper 1 to as not to emit particu- late matter or air �ataminants whicht (a) are r- Injurious to the health of either persons engaged IF In or related to the use of the lot, or persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in 3 no l ghboring areas; (b) substantially and adversely _( affect the maintenance of property In nearby areas; (c) are disruptive of industrial procastes carried on in other parts of the industrial area. Witere a -� use occupies a lot abutting or separated by a street lot with designated Class A or 0 performance stanJard for particulate matter and air contaminants shall apply at the common or facing lo: Iine. Odor: All uses shall be operated so as not to emit ;U ter "using unpleasant odors which are perceptive - to the average person 600' beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses .� ,s r�5',,��("�Sr��" ::.,, r � ...� u .r- •.lip s Special Consideration Hurd di tv, Neat and Glare: All use.- shall be oper- ates so es not to pro uce nx.Adl ty, heat„ glare, or high - Intensity Illumination milch Is perceptible without Instruments by the average person while on any lot zoned for residential purposes or any Industrial property with Class A or 8 performance standard designation. Due to the potential conflicts between uses within this subarea and the uses within the Industrial Park Category of adjacent Subarea 68, building Set- back from abutting property for Medium Manufactur- ing and greater IntensitV shall be not less than 451. Both the potential park site location and fire station location arc shown to Indicate approxi- mate location. Development within 600' of the Devore Freeway shall have outdoor storage areas completely screened from view along the freeway, Because of the existing rail service, users with rail service needs are permitted within the area west of Milliken Aven�a - IV -49 f i E 3 I� Al 5 #i r, yyIIt c." a !i l a. It- am 1+1,14 N �rpp' i gag; �l t!F aas ifr sl f�ii f�r f -yc f3c 1141 pct f rxe a S {a Nim t l,a SS 11 ! `r•i'� fit r ff7� rzP A a IMP l�l�s ail I!_ i} !.t r ii7�i: Phi g;r lrL 1 a C��pp� a [t23.F i�p4i4�i! i !z'Efl[i iii ;� liiii�! 34 I�y1 Ll3i�s ''ee77�� r !; a_�tri. ggtt iP ii'i• �f�E�if �aPls� S17t(at ^ 9 9 iLf'4P�r 31 Lila an 4i�tiY > i }-.a99 j S.a �Ii!tigPP! .g � ;i nfi3 yf�La i�pi i I _ €i.p. § _'A •a 331 i.�f tF�lL �c "7i19 l� kai. ii,i CS t$a ip °lira "�IiS i ipa toiQj -P 1 ip1 6SSg ;a ip1 r t� i P P r lfy`llI •i�a:l t i —il 3 g t esfajsi j�a 2 Y p i 3 j°ia I. NfSt ! L I 4 [ i fiGF pa S„if}ri68 iff �i I.17a 9lrrsA il'hf ��vi L!CS' It 1� +8l 337oli Win 77i �gl li�Alii °i ss�l�(c PP gAqjf S if l.` 'St�i fti°$ffif .r9 =3'� -IM ll P oafi 4i �fif] ygF!S�it i4I ILtgqIffiff ^ 5411p; i i;l � ji3�lt Rim °sciic �ddddEEEjfiL �zg..� aaaatg dl! !P ° " °yia LPs 3o f :•fFip ; +Sa` -_ �A c 3iyp lfa i��['9s A =Hitit i n n 0 7 � 5 z 0 c N 9 r z it , m d,, a z v a 0 N 4,1M 1111 : Ej.. 7 Special Consideration Humidity. Heat, cnd Glare: All uses shall be ow ated so as roc to produce I•ualdity, heat, glare, or hlgh- intenslty Illumination which Is perceptible without Instruments by the average person while on any lot zoned for residential purposes or any industrial property with Class A or 8 performance stanuord designation. Gus to the potential conflicts between uses within this subarea and the uses within the Industrjrl Park Category -of-,adjacent Subarea 18, building set= back from abutting property for Medium Hanufactur- Ing and greater intc:,ity shall be not less than 451. Both the potential park site location and fire station location are shown, to Indicate approxi- mate location Development within 6001 of the Devore Fteeway shall have outdoor storage areas completely screened from viers along the freeway. Because of the existing rail service, users with rail service needs are permitted within the area west of Milliken Avenue. IV -49 _ l SUBAREA 9 (Continued) Landscape Requirements 10% if the net lot area In the area between Arrow Highw,, extending 1000' south r52 of the net lot area In the remaining area 5 Performance Requirements Holse: The maximum allowable noise level of any ^ - use shall not exceed 85Ldn as measured at the lot r x line of the lot containing the use. Where a use is L within 20U feet of residentially zoned land, the _ noise level shall not exceed 65Ldn Where a use occupies a lot abutting or ,aparat"' by a street from a lot within the designated Class A or.$ parformansa standard or ras[den t al property, the sperformanca standard of the abutting property shall apply at the common or facing lot line. r Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without Instruments > by the average parson beyond 600' from where the I source is located. Vibration caused by motor vahl- clas, trains, and temporary construction and demoll- i tlon Is exempted rrom this standard, Particulate {W tear and Air Contaminants: In addl- tion to com7p ante with the AQnD standards, all uses shall be operated so as not to emit particu- late matter or .sir contaminants which: (a) are Injurious to the health of either persons engaged In or related to the use of the lot, or persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating In neighboring areos; (b) substantially and adversely _ affect the malntenaaca of property In nearby areas; ` (e) are disruptive of Industrial processes carried l on In other parts of the Industrial area. Where a -� use occupies a lot aoutting or separated by a street lot with designated Class A or 0 performance standard for particulate matter and air contaminants I shall apply at the common or facing lot line Odor: All uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptive to the average person 600' beyond any lot line of , the lot containing such uses. �i °aA 'q i' SUBAREA 9 (Continued) 100' Right -Of -Way - Rochester Arrow ") 88' Right -01' -Way - Cleveland Jarsey 4' 54' Right -Of -Way - 7th Vincent Utica and all other local _:rests 1121'Idn"Ll sit. — �du' Minimum Parcel Size Two (2) acres in the area botween Arrow highway extending 1000' %outh, five (5) acres In rem Ining areas Setback Requirements (Measured from ulti- mate face of curb) Milliken Arrow Rochester Cleveland Jersey 7th 8th 9th Vincent, Utica, and all otter local streets IV -47 Averag& Landscaping Parking 45' 25' 35' 20' 25' 15' rr� r i i 0- d y< 114, 0 SUBAREA 9 General Plan Designation Minimum Irpact Heavy Industrial .Primary Fuiction This subarea extends from Arrow Route south to ATGSF tracks, east of Haven and west of Devore Freeway Including Industrial users south of ATGSF tracks west of Devore Freeway. The subarea is traversed by the ,rain line of ATGSF railroad an the south with several rail spurs serving thu subarea Substantial portions of the area around Jersey Avenue are developed with both mealum and some heavy Industrial users. The function of this subarea Is to provide for the continuation of the existing uses and to provide the opportunity of the expansion of manufacturing and warehousrnq activity similar and compatible with the existing uses. Permitted Uses medium manufacturing Mlliiml Impact Heavy Industrial manufacturing Heavy Manufacturing Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Build l ng Supplies Ind Sales Eating and Drinking - rstabllshments Repair Services Conditional Uses Business Support Services Cc -u• icaticn Services Converlence Sales nd Services Fast Fond Food and Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals Petioloum Products Storage Recreational Facilities Extensive Impact Utility Facilit as Public Safe =y and Utility Services Access and Circulation 120' Right -Of -Way - Milliken n I �� r ^1• �Sy .<S�yyeP u n 11 1211. 111101r 113 94 ii 110nnow r IV -44 C e I I I� l L •FAQ J': iMINANCE NO. -94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCA40NPA AND PHILIP D SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT HOLOUIN, JR.. ROBERTA J. HOLOUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER JACQUELIN L. SCHLOSSER. DAVID N. RICHARDS04 AND GENE N. RICHARDSON The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. Government Code SK tion 65864 through 65869.5 authorizes the City to enter into binding Development Agreements with persons having legal or equitable int"sts in real property for the development of such property. B Three copies of the proposed Development Agreement (as contained in Exhibit I attached) between the City art r. iPP 0. Schlosser, Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Holuuin, Jr., Roberta J. of I. Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David H. Richardson and benc H. Richardson are on file in the office of the City Clerk, and the same are public records of the City. C The proposed Development Agreement pertains to real prcperty situated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernandno, and described as follows: PARCEL 1: The West 438,66 feet of Lots 25 and 26 of Rochester, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Aaps, Page 20, records of said County. EXCEPTING therefrom the Nest 50 feet of said Lot 25. PARCEL 2: Lots 25 and 26. Town of Roct. ter, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Raps, Page 20, records of said County. EXCEPTING therefrom the West 438.66 feet thereof. PARCEL 3: Lot 27, according to Rap of Rochester, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Raps, Page 20, records of said County. 0. The Planning Commission and City Council duly held public hearings on the Proposed Development Agreement. a 70 vaa4w . ` . br1 a CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. '• DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - SCHLOSSER FORCE AUGUST 20, 1986 r PAGE 2 E. The Planning Counission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of this Development „greement to the City Council by minute order on July 23, 1986. F. The provisions o° the proposed Development Agreement are consistent with the General Plan, and the provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. G. The City Council has determined that the development of property In accordance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan text within the city limits would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the property, developed in a runner authorized by the development approvals would be consistent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 2: The proposed Development Agreement between the City and Philip 0, c osser, Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Holquin, Jr., Roberts- J. Holquin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Gene P. Richardson referred to in Section 1 above, is hereby approved. On the effective date of this Ordinance, the Mayor shall sign as many copies of said Development Agreement as are necessary for the use of the parties, the City Clerk shall attest to the same and shall deliver one fully signed copy to the property owners. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark shall cau-iF-tli—esame to be published within fifteen (151 days after its passage at least once in The Daily Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation Dublished in the City o n ar o, California, and circulated in the City -of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ° rDL7/ '• i ■ STATEOFCAUFORNIA " — COUNTYOF SAN BERNARDINO as 1, Linda Paris on 1 am tlx Leg&; Ad; , do hereby REPORT, a that I newspaper of geaeralectrrolattm pTbHE DAILY REPORT, a dally Canty sad State afaresald and'fhat U City ofe � .a Notice of Public Gearing Rancho Cucamonga City Council i. w+PubI4 a Lnaatdner» papa, Cne (1) time towlt: August 8, 1986 -- -� 'cep ' a'atK of Perjury that the fargaing 6 hue and n Da ed at Ontario, CaWWAla tNa g S +tore) day of Augaat 19 86 r. l is ,i s +' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cUCA^+o STAFF REPORT' . Z o s P Date: August 20, 1986 LM I To: city Council and city manager 12as: Bill Holley, Ox u=ity Services Directo By: Jim Benedetti, Assistant Park Planner R Subject: Approval of the Conceptual Plan, Negative Declaration, and Authorization to Pdvertlse for proposals for the Beryl Dark Kest Extension Developrcurt Project. The Beryl Park - West Extension, which is approximately 10 acres in size, will extend the existing Beryl Park facility to Carnelian Street, this will include the Metropolitan Kater District right of way. The cono4tual park master plan, see attachment exhibit A, is the product of the neighboring residents and members of the Community Services Department. This master plan includes the following uses which are consistent with the existing park facilities to the east: 2 lighted soccer fields, picnicking, sand play area with play equipment, rest rooms, volleyball, basketball, an exercise course and ample on -site puking. The park site plan has been reviewed by the Park Development commission who recommended that the City Council review and approve the plan The Planning Cxmnission has reviewed the park site plan and asks that the City Council pay special attention to the access to and from the site. Staff has rpli��bth the Planning Oommission's concerns. (See Exhibit •B•, A Negative Declaration indicating that the project will have no significant effect upon the environment is also attached for City Canmcil aoproval. BECt2"ZMATION: 1 That ty Ox=il approve the Conceptual Development Plan; 2. Authorize the Cemmrunity Services Department to seek proposals for Enginneering servioar to Implement the adopted site plan which has been budgeted in the program of services 1985 -961 and 3. Authorization by the Mayor to the Cancunity Services Departrent to execute a Negative Declaration, as a result of the Environmental Assessment, and to file it with the appropriate agency. Attachments: 017-3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM014GA MEMORANDUM Date, August 20, 19E6 To, umbers of the City Council and the city Manager From, Tim Benedetti, Assistant Park Planner W'W`1 Subject, Beryl Park Nest EXtacaion Vehicular Ac ess dgGMn,, n c l � a O y V > L9n The members of the Planning Commission have expressed concern over the entrance /exit roadway to the proposed Beryl Park west Extension. (See Engineering design oide elloop ae safe ingress land egress the o the Park site as follows: (See Exhibit BI Tha access drive to the parking lot has been placed at the optimum Position 5 an the future location of the Foothill Freeway offramP, the existing Highland Avenue to the vest, and the existence of single fanny housing directly to the North. Because of concerns expressed by the planning - ommiseion, a deceleration lane has been added for northbound traffic on Carnelian making the right td-r" into the driveway. The driveway has been designed with curb returns of a radius usually used for major street intersections. This will proclde much higher turning speeds than are usually obtained at driveways. The length of the driveway between Carnelian street and the parking lot is quite long, allowing for stacking of four to five cars entering the park and six cars leaving. This is an advantage not usually found on driveways irto such projects. The width of the driveway allows two e<'_t lanes which rill separate right and left turning traffic thus allowing adequate capacity to empty this large parking lot in a reasonable time. The parking lcc itself is quite large for a park of this sire and abould eliminate the need for overflow parking. Due to narrow width, parking cannot be allowed on Carnelian Straat and will be prohibited by the Posting of No Pa Pkinq signs along both :,ides it Carnelian Street from 19th street to Banyan Avenue. The hours of peak operation or the park vil: not coincide with the peek traffic hours on Carnahan Street. Peak traffic on Carnelian occur during the normal rush houra in the,aorning and the evening. Saturday traffic on Camelian is higher than o't -peak levels durinq the weekday, however it is not expacted that serious traffic conflicts wil. occur between weekend Carnelian Street traffic end park traffic. At the time the Foothill Freeway is built it is expected that justification will exist for a traffic signal at the freeway interchange. At this ties, the signal system should be extended to include the Park driveway/Highland Aver „e intersection because of its proximity to the freeway ramps. a9V A second exit from the parking lot is not necessary, but if =a were to be developed, the only feasible routc would be a temporary connection through t *e freeway right of way fret this parkinq lot t� the east parking lot. A connection from this parking lot north to Alta Loma Drive would require purchase of a house and would have the fur-her disadvantage of imposing park traffic onto a local street with attendant aisadvandages of ovarflow parking on that stree', noise and commotion in a residential area and trash deposits Traffic volumes, which while not unusual fcr a collector or an arterial, would be unpleasantly heavy for such a local rtreet. 1 W'.+' r I I ` ZL t:-X�}li�l� GROSS WALK - �N'f�ANGE L.aNF — �f�alaHf /L=�f NWi L/kN� _ Nt TVM OHLY M�TROPoIIiAy, DKTRILT PIPB LIMI, MCI 'oL� i TAR1- It�L'!i i ir= 1�t(oN Slt�i,( 1 fpp tqAy SCALS p•= ':1 -7 7 1 ✓ o F� = J J Z � ILL hi AL �V 3 ` ZL t:-X�}li�l� GROSS WALK - �N'f�ANGE L.aNF — �f�alaHf /L=�f NWi L/kN� _ Nt TVM OHLY M�TROPoIIiAy, DKTRILT PIPB LIMI, MCI 'oL� i TAR1- It�L'!i i ir= 1�t(oN Slt�i,( 1 fpp tqAy SCALS p•= ':1 -7 7 X111 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. Brief Description of Project: The project involves the development of a 10+ acre park site to include a rest room building, eandscaping, hardscape, T children's play area, an open play area, picnic area (Lrcluding 4 picnic sheltern), a nine station exercise ' course, 2 lighted soccer fields, a basketball- court, a volley court, and a 94 stall parking lot 2 Name and Address of Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 3 Pursuant to the provisions Of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment An Environmental Impact Report will not be required 4 Minutes of such decision and the Initial Study prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are on file in the City Clerk's Offica of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 This decision may be appealed to the City C3ancil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A written appeal and :cling fee =at be received by the City Clerk's Office no later than 5:00 p m , fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the City Council's decision. 4 6 This Negative Declaration is subject to the implementation of mitigating measures (if any) as listed on the attachments DATED Jeffroy Ring Title Mayor 1. N,Y.. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Offlce of Planning and pesearch FROM: 1400 Tenth Street Ranh+ 121 (Public Agency) Rancho Cucamonca. P.O. Box 007 Sacramento, CA 93814 Ranrno Cucat•.onF_ CA 41 I30 % County Clerk County of San Bernardino Bert') Park West Extension Pro,eec Title Assessor's Parcel /'s 201- 22 -38, 202 -22 -42 rol�Locauen- opecauc p. -.4. r.•...,,.,. car g.,na rt r] Project Loeatton{ity Ptolect Leeauon- Corotr,�� Development of a 102 acre ark site. L)cse:pUm of Nature, Pupae, and BMGficla"m of .Fojcc Citv of Rancho Cucamonga C'tv Council Name of Pun c Age — eney Approving leG Ccmmunit,, Services Deoartment. It of Rancho Cucamonga Name of Prson or Agency Carrymg Out Prole,- CExempt Status: (Ghee Ctel. Ministerial (Sac 13073) Declared Emergency (Sec, 13071 (a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 13471 (b) and (e)) k Categorical Exemption. State type and section number. Re`asor� vny prole^ -, u exempt: Jamrs P. Benedetti 774 ono taco Ccnta Person Arca Code Telephone Ex:enuon If Wed q' app�evtt: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the Project? Yes ^ No _ MIA Datr Received for Filing Signature N +vnr_ rtfv M Rancho Coca onoa , TItle Revised January 19V s.i: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee' $87 00 ror all projects requiring environmental review, this -aorm must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is nade. Upon receipt of this applications, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the initial Stud-v. The Development Review Coax -ttee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before. the public ,meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a '.Eegative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will ba prepared, or 3) An additional information repent would be supplied by the applicant giving further informz- tion concerning the proposed project PROJECT TITLE: Beryl Park Hest Extension S NAME:, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NI,ME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO HE CONTACT^^ CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: James P Benedetti same address As above_ LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSeeSSOR PARCEL NC.) Assessor's Parcel is 201 22 -38, LO<" -22 -42 _ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TAB AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building permits from 'V City of Rancho Cucamonga I -- I r PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: ProJ ct acreage is 30± acres, restroom building 4s to be 375± sf.. There are no existing structures on the site DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOR.YRTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which alth ^ugh individually small, may as a who`e have significant environmental impact? I -? !PILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Crea-:e a substantial change in ground contours? X_ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X ]. Create a substantial change in demand far municipal services (police, firs, water, sewage, etc )? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? )" I 5 Reserve any existing trees? How many? 6. Create the reed for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or exolosivas? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPOR_ANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next pace R. A CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the state�.ents fu�nlshed above and in the attached exhibits p.esent the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my aoility, and that the facts, statements, and cnformatio� presented are true and correct to the best of -v knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to he submitted before an adequate evaluation can be node by the DevnleloFmenntt Review Committee Date July 7. 1986 Signature &— �imes pp. Benedetti Title Assistant Park Planner— a I- 3 011 CITY OF RA,YCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY EMIIROMIENTAL CHECKLIST APPLICANT: City of R2neh0 Currm,q, FILING DATE: LOG NUHSEI: PROJECT: Beryl Park W st Frtnnsinn PROJECT LOCAIION: Assessnr's Pa ... lJonk 0201 -72-ia X202 -22 -42 I E VIROY:fiNTAL 11-3ACrS (Explanation of all "yes" and "mnyle" answers are required on attached sheets) a) R-3 t YES MAYBE NO _ Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have sigrificanc results in: a Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? r b Disruptions, displacemantn, compaction or X burial of the coil? _ c Change in topography or ground surface X contour intervals? _ d The destrue_1on, covering or modification of any unique geologic or phys cal features! X e Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting nithav on or off site condicons? _- a f Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? �_ X g Exposure of people or property to 1•eotogic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides. ground failure, or similar hazards? X h An increase in the rate of extrt:tion and /or use of any mineral reso•i -_o? X -_ X 2, Hydrology. Will the proposal cave significant results ia: a) R-3 t MI n raga < YES MAYBE I:0 a Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing stream, rivers, or ephemeral acres= channels? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattetna, or tht rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow'of flood waters? _ X d Change in the amount of surfaca water in any body of •, &ter? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? _, X f Alteration of groundwater ch.mracteris tics? X S. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additi.ocs or with- drawals, or through interfevence with an aquifer? Quality? X Qucatity? _ h The reduction in the amount of water other- X vise available for public water supplies? _ I. Exposure of people of property to water X related hazards such as flooding or soiches? _ J Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile X or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b Deterioration of ambient atr quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable X air quality standards? c Alt.racion of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture X or temperature? 4 Mote 1 Flora. W111 the proposal have significant results in: a Change in the characteristics of species, iecludiwg diversity, distribution, or number X of any species of plants? -- b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare X or endangered spacise of plants^^? � 3 Y E sue• M, M �. rage J YES MAYBE NO c Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? —_ X d Reduction in the potential for agricultural X production? — Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: t a Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers X of any species of animals? _ _ — b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare X or endangered species of anL^ -2197 _ _ — c Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier X to the migration or novemc:t of animals? _ _- — d Deterioration or removal of existing fish or X wildlife habitat? _ _ — S Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a Will the proposal alter the location, distri- b,ttfon, density, diveraity, or growth race of X the human populatianj f so. area7 _•, __ — b Will the propasal affect axisting housing, or X create a demand for additional housing? — 6 Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socia- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax race, and property X valuast b Will project Costa be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, 1 a., buyers, X tax payers or project users? �— — 7 LnJ Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have signi[icanc results in7 a A substantial alteration of the present or X planned land use of an area? b A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental X entitles? — c. An impact upon the quialry or quantity of existing consumptive or non- consuaptiva !•'t' recreational opportunities? __ -- lit., 1 Page i YES MAYBE NO 8 Transaorcatlon. still the proposal have significant f results III: a Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ X — b Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? �. r c Effects on existing parking facilities- or demand for new parking? _ 3 d Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? __. X a Alterations to present patterns of clrcula- X tion or movement of people and /or goods? _ f Alterations to or effects on present and � poceaclel water - bonne, rail. Haas transit or t i air traffic? — — X g Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X bicyclists or pedestrians? _ 9 Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to thi441ntearity of archaeological, x paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10 Health. Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the d propusal have s:dniticanc results In: a Creation of any health hazard or potential health X hazard? b Exposure of people to potential health hazards? , X c. A zlslc of explosion or release of hazardous i substances in the event of an accident? d An Increase in the number of individuals ,f or species of vector or pachenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? �- X a In :resse in existing noise levels? �— r f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous - noire icvale7 The creation of oblac:fonable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? X 1 I 'i 1 i Page 5 YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? X b. The creation of an aes chatically offensive site? e. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? _ X 11 Utilities ano Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new syotens, or alterations to the following: X a Electric power? b Nature• or packaged gas? __ A c Comunicaclons syste=ms? ,_ X d Water supply? x e Wascavatar facilities? % f Flood control structures? X g Solid waste facilities? X _ h Fire protection? X 1 Pollee protection? X j Schools? x k. Parks or other recreational facilities? x 1 Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? x m. Other gove=encal services? �_ x 11 Energy and Scarce Resource%. Will the proposal have significant results in: a Use of substantial or v cassive fuel or erargy? X r b Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? C An increase in the deciand for development of new sources of energy? d An increase or perpaturtion of N:e consumption of non — renewable fours of enargf, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? _ x Q- *2 a I r Of, YES MAYBE h) a. S,rbstantlAl depletion of any nonre•.ewable or scarce wmural resource? 14 Handatory Yiadlnae of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially rajuce the habitat of fish or wl7,dlifa species, cruse a fish or wildlife populatlon to drop 1•alow self sustaining Levelo, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal conammiry, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? x b Doe* the project have the potential to achieve short -cem, to the disadvantage of long -term, envlronmancal goals? (A short -cam impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive patina sf time while long- I term impact* will endure well into the future) c Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incrsmeatal effects of an Sndividval project are considerable when viewed in connection with i1he effects of past projects, and probable future projects). X_ d Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Y II DISCUSSION OF ENVIgOMSNTAL EVALUATION (i a., of affirmative answer& to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures) I„ Page 7 ' III. DETEMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: OI find the proposed project COULD NOT have a aignificaac affect on the anriroomanc, and a nCATM DECI.A- RATION will be prepared I find that although the propcsad project covid nave a significant effect an the environment, there will not be a aifnificant Affect I. this case because the mitigation measuras delcribad on an attached sheac have been edded to cha project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE P.REPA.. ` �--� I fiad the prnposed_projecc W have a si ;.as' can: effect on the 1 tacit .crc, and an c::JTRCSr :; I:?AC- ?=2037 IS rattirtc Dacy__ duly 7, IRA _1V1i0f6 da &1W, SSgaacu:• Assistant Park planner Tit-1a a is II. DISCUSSION OF DMIROHM221TAL LVALDATION Items 1b, and It. 1b. Park Construction will oubstantiallf grads tht entire surface with cut and fill to achieve a mouth site to accommodate the site Amenities. The grading operation will be disruptive but not detrimental or adverse to the enviroment. tc. Refer to 1b. Items 8a, and 8g. The environmental evaluations which mmy result in significant affects am the Possibilities of additional vehicular traffic movement which may increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, hirycles, and pedestrians. The following proposed mitigating ma.aures are being taken to address the possible effects, Aligning the access orive to the paWng lot with the existing intersection of Highland Avenue end Carnelian Street, widening the access drive to accmmOdAm One entrance lane and two exit lanes, the access drive is approximately ISO' long to allow for the stacking of four to five cars entering the park and six cars leaving, the driveway has been designed with curb returns of a IS' radius to allow for higher turning speedu into the access drive, an 80' deceleration lane for north bound traffic entering free Carnelian Street to allow vehicles to move clear of the main stream of traffic, 'No Parking- signs will be posted on both sides of Canalian Street to relieve possible on street congestion, proviws adequate on- site:parkfeg for 96 vehicles, and at the time the Foothill Freeway is built it is expected that them will be justification for a traffic signal to be installed which will include tho intersection of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street. The hours of peak operation of the park will not coincide with the peak traffic hours on Carnelian street. Peak traffic on Cr =Alien occurs during the normal rush hours in tba morning and the evening. Saturday traffic on Carnelian is higher than off -peak levels during the weekday, however, it is not expected that serious traffic conflicts will Occur between weekend Carnelian Street traffic and park traftle. Items 106. and 10h. 10e. Currently the site in c omprised of opmn brush area, therefore, the irtroduction of any activity which generates a-y level of sound can be described as An i.,erease. However, the new sound level will be consistent with those of other muni--lral parks ana are an accepted and desired part of the makings of any residential area. 10h. Light or glare from the nau'soccer field will be prevent during the hours Of Operation. The lights will be directed and shielded (if necessary) to minimise light glare into adjacent areas. � 9v ,jTA1E t -F CALIFORNIA t COU TPYOFSANBERMARDINO, as Linda Parisian I, . do hereby certify &At I am the Leg'! AdctrVlft cleric d ME DAILY REPORT, a daily WwWaper of CMW &W : at* AfW aid and tl6a 'the jdarbrl i&eerttsemmt Notice Of Public Rearinq Rancho Cucamon -ja City Council I..w&*pubUshedLia'(dnmgjagw One (1) time .'tawft:Auqust 8, 1986 'Correct. underpeefWty Of Pedury that the imnO ay L true and `a.9a�7ii (Sign'tcre) Date! at Ontario, Cawsrnla ft 8 day of August __ I9B6 I i L 1 L 5 I w 10 rrn.v nt. n A urvn rrrrAa.tnur_A STAFF REPORT .a ., Kn DATE, August 20, 1986 TO: City Council and City Koester���j PROM: Mark E. Lorimar, Addmistrative Analyst s SUDIECTt INSURANCE _ y REQUIREMENTS pot AMBUTAUCE Op CIATO29 The City Council will recall that at its last meeting, representatives from Trans Medical Ambulance submitted a request to eased the current $4,000,000.00 per single incident liability requirement to a $2,000,000.00 amount. At that times the City Attorney offered an alternative to the insurance provision in tba Ordinance whereby the City Council or City Manager would be authorized to review and approve the insurance coverage provided for ambulance operators on a came -by -case basis., Io such an instance, the Ordinance would not reflect an exact dollar amount of insurance coverages rather the amount of insurance required by the City would be dependent upon conditions of the insurance industry at the time. Since the last City Council meetings representatives from Trans Medical Ambulance have suggested the possibility that $4s00D9000.00 general liability insurance is possible to obtain. While no firm commitment has been made to either ambulance company in providing that amount of insurance, the City should pursue the possibility and delay any amendment to the existing insurance requirements. Staff will continue working with the ambulance providers in securing the anxima amoont of insurance which may be reasonably obtained. At this points staff reeomseads that no action be taken on this matter. In the sweat $4.000.000.00 of general liabiliy insurance is not possible to obtain, on alternative recoueadation for City Council action will be presented at the August 20 meetings along with An Urgency Ordinance making any necessary amendments to the existing insurance provision. Should you bave any questions or comments relative to the ambulance insurance issu, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. 1@1. /d ja I Gregg - Miller 6 Associates, Inc PO Box 16891 1129 E. Missour$ Phoenix, AZ 85011 Schaefer Ambulance Service, Inc. etal PO Box 74697 Los Angeles, CA 90004 1 tl1 UAMATT[aM ION Alo COIIr[U WOP0M.5 WOO C CDT ll[ M TINS CEAnnfJ1Tff DO ! MaT IY[Na, QT[!D M ALIG TM CCYl146E AtIOwOCD [Y TW PIXloTO 410 W. I COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE m A TriSCar Insurance Company LETTERY■ ft Y 1i361i� TNna ioeurr T14T ra1mel arPULNIUICE LnTm E60wlNLV[E[OIe[aL1mroTK Pnua[o NAAMD Awns TW POl1CY PlNOOWOKAT[o. NO ammo m WY ANY Paau01[lvrt, T[IW dI CONMTtON or ANY COIRMR al OTM[N OOCIW[MT with IRYe:T TO WIOCN Tie! C[1wPIGT[ MAY [! fLEw 011 WY It11TAM4�Ta[AtLLwANCI ArraaoEn 0Y TI POUQ! wXaltD II[A[N t3 W[J'R TO ALL TK itM, t \WpgMl, ANO coNp. TqN! Or [IPCN Poup[!. 'AWN'..kk..II�UULLUU a�a City of Rancho Cucamonga INC%0 ANY OP THE AO Of[ POUCt[[t CANCIUL` 9320 Base Ltna Rd., Butte C rla4Tgy DATE TMIMOP. THE IafnlNO COMPANY %TL ',FO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 VATfRt MARK LORI?ffR wTINNMUO a[mes[NTATTVa ,. v ervrtfrraTOAmmVP ACQTPTAN - OF WSUNANCE UfCM IROr TOw.PO, UABItlIV LAAT! W TMOOLNO! Wa4TTY n <WK NPW .SOC$pAAw re�a�AR '1 [mI.VY+VNO s S TSO]'N1TI] Of(UMPS nw. TCL 100001 7 -1 -86 7 -1 -87 r aIP S 1,000 S 1,000, tvr ooLTA4TOa wT XCP(n a41.1(j nuw Pe0.50NAL WA1aY s 0A T'S MALPRA 'TICE 1,000, AeroMOaaE w m. 41r wo 4L W" 4170$ Ii�w0Vq Pit$ I Q, 4l ON0t0 WT09�MY[I tSN� '�Yt $ A wm 4Rr N010euo WDS TAU 100001 7 -1 -86 7 -1 -8T GNLO: LWtITY 6 L A aan LLWYTY IawRl1A 7001 MCpmgp $ S no T Lwan loNJ RTMtlry woNN[ro• ANMnN,ATNNI S lual 4xarn AND s pwA$$Pdp LA[T) [ANILOr[U' lIAlAITT S mvAU Ua[w mw. OTHER ME ceSrlur M Of OPe1UTK6aOfATNNA$MNClfaSP = ff1 T TrTPATTnw nP TRC;ntAwrr a�a City of Rancho Cucamonga INC%0 ANY OP THE AO Of[ POUCt[[t CANCIUL` 9320 Base Ltna Rd., Butte C rla4Tgy DATE TMIMOP. THE IafnlNO COMPANY %TL ',FO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 VATfRt MARK LORI?ffR wTINNMUO a[mes[NTATTVa ,. v ervrtfrraTOAmmVP ACQTPTAN - k- t ✓rwutrnautronrnncrrtemrc� aib ✓MI•wr r6 ewr a raMrMGet omtl ern arena . ern emamN TMOprear>ers August 20. 1989 1 Dunn Waterman CIW Meager C1W of Aancln Curaadnpa 9329 Iapltne Armho Cucmtanta. CA 9U30 Dear or. YuareanI W are pleated to ammwice that M ham Dan a ►la to tncreaa Wr Insurance 1121tt to $1,990,000. This 1t slightly more than required by the City of Ancha Cucaamnpa. Attached is a copy of the temporary dturuce blear. 7x Sh"Id you ban aq questlwf or need bruw Intonation, plate do rot batluto to camtect M. Slnurely, .S. � 4 ?� cc: Or, smn%pnittsrfa r!� ?4 kS u 5 k y jj yr. .L a Y J r �i L.D.I ',Iaaaraots' 0 loteo 3666 r4.Ca -1 Or. 1 l01 Tu: o: a, G. 970D7 u 6a11u1 or1. 7ary blolu¢n taes.r,a. 97771 -:776 asasalrJaaaabaaaa�r :Af batwJywysry YtJ.M Y...w a ItT1 U FRIM.I.J.JIr/ Je�brMabb 11aaRYCaaOKtl rMYM GbYbtWl ow asbar sae�l Ytl hl n / a�MY i�Y.a�r '.3 tsw...tl Q bna cswnaw+aao. sew / Ci1wO.OlIJLb t Y.ftY rbsY / bb��wMY 1 70/60,000. r�w Isdealrls2 IW WJY Y MbM b aG.M as/,t t, b pY Yw a/.p ew..nr asry mare r .. I IOearYMr`a"a�MftJ"Yat ' ❑ NOaa/M' CCY// ; *FaJ4TlYp aa.uh uwt sYM � /rtD1Pf Y/bUl: — lYM t ara cwarnarntw taJlud 1,14 _ 11obtSit/ as of 6/19/66 ..tlb.bbJ.a.Yb... ❑.Ytb.. obaa..�. �S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 20, 1986 70: City Council and Lity Hanayer From: bill Holley, Director, Lonerunity Services Department by: Karen hcGulre- Enery, Assistant Park Planner Subject: Trail Implementation Program - Report to the City Council Regarding the Trails Implementation Program and Request for Professional Services (Continued from July 16, 1986 meeting) BALKIROURD: Alnond Trail The completion of the Alrond Trail has been a priority ften on the list of 7rail Inplenentation Projects by the Trails Advisory Committee for some time. Until recently, it was common belief that the easement for trail purposes was aligned in the existing open space to the north of Tract 9521 and that it was only necessary to relocate a few existing fences to take the trail passable. In April of this year, h on,. K Surveying and Engineering, was hired to survey this area to locate the exact alignment of this portion of the trail and to determine which areas or fencing would h,ve to be ielocated. The expenditure for the professional services of H a.,d K Engineering, in the at-ount of $660.00 (see attached invoice 986 -310), .gas directed by the Community Services Director, and authorized 6y the Lity Council in approval of the warrants on July 23, 1986. Funcing for this service had been appropriated in the budget for the Trails ImA erentation Program. As a result of this survey however, it has teen detemined that the actual location of the tr31l easement is not located as It was originally believed and further study will have to be done to r ?locate the trail through this area. Trail Implementation Plan On hay 28, 1986, tLe Planning Lorrission held a otscusslon on the status of Trails and the proposed developrent of the Trails Implementation Plan. At this time, the Planning Commission unanimously directed the Planning Start to forward to the City Council a request that Trails be given consideration In the 1986 -67 Work Program /Budget. The Lity Council, at their June be 1986 Budget Workshop concurred with the Planning Commission's request and directed the Planning statt to prepare a report with budgetary estimates. At that time, It appeared that direction was given for the Traits Implementation Plan to be funded from reserves. aR3 !S- Since that time, the Planning staff has had several meetingt with the Commanity Services Department staff to develop a joint effort on this matter. In order to accomplish the concept, originally put forth by the Planning Commission, both the Planning staff and the Community Services Department staff agree that the distribution of a Request for Proposal Is in order to set up this Comprehensive Trail Stu -1y. Once the Request for Proposal is developed, a base committee will be assembled to evaluate the proposals received. This committee will be made up of one Planning Commission Member, one Park Development Commission Member, one Community Development Planning Staff Member and nne community Servicrs Department Staff hember. Upon ;election of a consultant, a broader base committee will be toned to work with the consultant in formulating the actual trail plan. this committee is likely to include members from the existing Equestrian Trails committee, bicyclists, hikers as %ell as non -trail users. This Lomprehensive Trail Implementation Study would be based upon three components: - Regional Vulti- Purpose Trails - Coaa,unity Trails -Local Feeder Trails The first phase of the study would establish a Policy Plan for develop&Ant and would provide the cost factors in establishing each of these cocryonents. The second phase of study would outline the Impler.entatiun Program for the establishment of these nee trails. A rough estimate of the cost to accomplish these two phases 1s approximately $4U,000 (S20,UUU for the Policy Plan and f'1U,000 for the Implementation Program), and would tyke 0-6 months to develop, based on the anount of time spent in public meetings. ih• third phase of this progran would include acquiring property to connect the axlsting trail system and the new trails. An estlnate for this portion of the Study has yet to be determined since it would be based on th, final Implementation Plan and the number of connections necessary. Recomrendation: It is the recommendation of the Planning Lommission flat the Trails Implerentation Study be accoa,plishtu. If it is Councils des' • to give direction to proceed upon the rccomm,endation of the Planning , xrodssion, staff recour,ends following the Implementation Plan as outllred In this report. 1;"N . q. a...... v..........I.... e... ......... .......................vv....... ' STATEMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ! H & K Svy'g & Eng., Inc DATE t 07/11186 20705 valley Blvo. Oalnut, California 91789 ' CLIENT NO. PROJECT t Surveying Services ' City of Rancho Cucamonqa for the Almond Trail ' PC Bor. (3O' ' Rancho Cucanonga. CA 91730 INVOICE t 36 -310 ' ' Purchaas Order No. ' ' 01-4532 -6028 a........ ............................ ................a...............' ' Attentions ( \ t Me. Karen Emory ' ' t AMOUNT ! ' ' JN TYPE Or WORK 1 DUE ! ' .__-•_______________________ ___ __ ____.._....... .......... i ' '005- -)O1 Topographic Survey of the t ' A.mond Equestrian Trail t 660.00 PAID JUL 2 1 tRu I '\ 9 JUL' k- -r"c'f For Payment i ^t i ! --------------- - - - - -- ------------------- .............. , ' TOTAL CURRENT FEESt $660.00 ' ' PREVIOUS BALANCE t ' ' INrEREST DUE t ' 07/11/86 PAVVENT RECEIVED t THANK ! YOU ' ' AMOUNT NOW DUE t 4560.00 ' i ! APPROVED BVt - -- ! _________________ ......... 0..... a.. O. Y ................... ..............................! 19S .. •t ..n e�rn.vn. �ir..auua:5•t+Y•• (K:Nr4l_.- •ki�t11 YI10Y ..•..wn,scaoe PrCVIM � t•' 86 -310 laPOGRAFNIC SU EY :3530 1- 4532 -602 6LG.00 ARRANT N0. 899 L6C.CC MC� G c 008993 w n ~ „1 �f a,IW Z( "• I• YIMMVAr41`• Maur -3A A9lS "-_'ly rr�rsr6L0.00�• PAY"49WM 01 •�evr3kt C!liwi'" Nq• 00 gNID •-: 'Ya0VN0'lCW1m t H W OAn MT16011wor • tT• �7 1t'. �' „_f. .� • s+. -vk. . MT N C K �URUEYINO•L_E sINfiEAI)I0 . �1OT•NEGOTIABLE 23509 VALLEY OLVp: ' ” 4. ' WALNUT, CA -917AS c •' •� y.� SANK( .AMIJA A _ ^ :• .0 - tl1GVOMlAG �'OOA993a 1:&U000661}: C0363-802000 -------- -------------------------- L T. City of �*ICHO CUCAMONGA - Purchase Order _ _ _No,_03530. TNG AGOVI OROGR NUMB CR MUGT UIIM ON ALL INVOICII. IACRINO ILI" MO CORN VOMPCNCK SUPPLICR: "' SHIP PREPAID TO Hackett A KmnzYCI LLIO. CLty of ILvIcho Q]C=cnga 20585 Valley Blvd. .O.I D.O. Box 807 aI ` �,' ,.r,l ;rL •:vl ihlmit, CA 91789 '- TOtctolto Oratoogal CA 91730 Gn7 nuv +taauT 'IaI•!c a •e_'+ ar t:'I vI o .o a.:rro; =�til; _L _ OATS Rlr..wru.nlmrvwow x. (moll ,N Wmlgnrwru ..GVUI...... r 4-5-86 CamLadty Semi= Fuen MCGat= Anbtose b ouwwrnv UNIT O/lCRITOI. "WcwuNT MO.'' UNfTIRIca TOTAL Professiore'1 services for Survey of a 01- 4532 -6028 portico of the Almond Trail located west of Ar hihtld Not to Emend 5660.00 �I. — OjenMM 080E1 FLEM! DD la T DUPLICATE 21111 co r9R3 1 1.•l. Ali. wb4GYHIGtLYIIRAL[EOVFRTr[M,CITY IMGCXO LYGNI L2l.11IYllm s,Y •X WMNA wa.mwY.INM14AwL .0 T LGS aL. GIrN.rW [wYSV���,•an �r-yr,. L's �. a%IVtI•i11NORurh Y'. < =,% ; ♦ _ _ y C .97 PURCHASINO C uncxwuxG woa'T��