Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986/12/03 - Agenda Packet
i � M Cny OF Q RANCHO CUCAMONGA s REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA 1917 Lions Park Coaaunity Center 9161 Ease Line Boyd Rancho Cuuwongs, %litornia �erwber 3. 196: - j,04) D.P. A, CALL To 00ft 1. Roll Call: Bravo __, Buquet _. Stout _. King _, and Wright _. P. only" gALMM The following Csaaaat Calendar item *ra aspect*d to be routine and sea- eowtrweraial. They will be attel ups by the IM at se tiws wLtbmt discuasioa. Y 1. Approval for continuing the appropriation of $58.000 1 frs FY 05 -86 to FE 86 -87 for purchase of the PEAR Cowputer Systes. 2. Approval to adopt Resolution authorizing change of 2 rov banking aeeountc fron First Trust to Bank of America. j, RESOLUTION 90. EA 86 -09 9 ?4 A RESOLUTION OF YES RMCBO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADIHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF BANE ACCOUNTS MITE THE EME OF AMERICA AND DESIGNATING THOSE PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO ACT OE BEHALF OF THE RANCHO CUCLWNCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY �' �_T014IG nluncB ,g. aTAn RRraen 1. REVIEW AND APPROVE THE ANNUAL REPORT OF Al no, 4 ACrIYlT-IES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985/66. E. AWOBE> w r. r _ a k R J S i CITY OF RA,%VfO CUCAMOIW REDEVELOPMENT AGFNCY STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, .986 708 Redevelopment Agency Board and Rzetutive Director PROMS Jim Hart, Tessurer HUBJRCTt CORTTggIRC 1PPROPRTATIOF 9 X U 65-66 TD n R6-:a POR poec�.LlbL.2.lIRR COMOTII 8T87L1 The Rancho Cucamonga Rsdevelopment Agency outhot.se continuing appropriation of 858,000 from rr 65 -86 to rr 86 -8/ for purcbane of the PRIME computer system. Da6troend• to PT 85-88, the agency sutborixed erpenditura of approximately 858.000 tward purchase Of the PRIM computer system. The actual purchase of too PRIM toot place in early Yr 88-81. Therefore, staff is r"usstiug continuiry the rpprorristion of 858,060 icto PT 86 -87 for application toward the purchase of the PRIME computer system. Respectfully submitted, J�' Z131- Jim Hart Treasurer JH:cv �+Rs i' ) L ,Ei 5� ij CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOI RMEUL OPMPNT ACENC STAFF REPORT DATE: December 7. 1986 TOS Redevelopmeor Agency Board and Executive %reetee PR0MS Jim Sort, Treasurer SUBJECTS CUMCE O o a-F f D ,r fAM O► YA I nn"affm The Rudsvelopment Agency Board adopt the attached fasolutiaS authorising change of tankiug accounts from First Trust to Ranh of Aasrlca. ILWLEOUAL Iu July 11'861 the City transferred all account, to Bank of Aaerica. Thia computer wall contact,, 410 bsndln large suu� olryone. funds, receive eceive vivo transfers directly from the State, and generally provide a higher level of service. Staff has been extremely pleased with the change and the capability boa allowed for more efficient computer funds. iwaatrcnt and handling of To consolidate all City /Reduveiopment Agency accounts into Run instltutior. will further enhance our ability to efficiently handle all tinaneiol tt•anuetions, fie aao positive avpects and benefits available to the CL t7 will also be available to the RDA, thus, internal coordination of both functions will be enhanced. Respectfully submitted, Jim Hart Treasurer JR:cy Y •1 . + Ti n A RE20LUTIO! R0. A 1I20LUTION Or TUN RANCUO CUC&MMA XIMI .OPNINT t ACOICT AUTEOR'SAO US ISTAILISMMT 07 HANK ACCOUNTS VIM TRi EANR 07 AMQICA AND DIIIONATm 711029 Pincus AUMO3Ii® TO ACT OR BEHALF 07 TRN RANCNO CUCAMMA REDRPCLOn=T AC OCT. i piMWJ, The Raocko Cucamonga 7edevalop.eut Agency desires the most effisiest staff handling and coordination of its funds, sad make the most efficient4ausa Available toestaff.�aat Agency dulsu to follows 3 7RERAOR9, the Rancho Cueasioaga Redevelopment Agency resolves as I Necessary opersting, checking and savings accounts may be i established vith the lank of America. 2. Computer linkage through EJIf11AC is anthotised. y 3. Jim Hart, Rancho Cucamonga Ieda"16TOent Agency Treasurer, is , authorized to sign all checks necessary to aeempliah laneho Cucemooga Redcvelopceat Agency business. 4. In toe Treasurer's &bounce, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's Eceeurive Director, Lauren Ressarman, or Rancho Cucamouga Redevelopment Agency's Chairman Dennis Stoat nay elan checks to accomplish Rancho Cusanongs Pedevalopment Agency busiuesu. s. The Treasurer is directed to establish any other procedures necezoary, for the most efficient handling of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment igency's financial matters and authorized to sign any necessary contracts or documents. 3 <, CITY OF RA1JC1-10 CUCANIOi REDEVELOPMENT AGENC' STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 i TO: Chairman and Members of Redsvolopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: ANNUAL REPORT Od REDE' /ELOPMENT ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985/86 RECOMMENDATION= Revlew and approve the 1985/86 Agency Annual Report of aat es, and author xo its transmittal to the appropriate State agencies. BACKGROUND, iTe Health and Safety Code, beginning with Section 33080, requires Q every a eve opment Agency to file an Annual Report of Its activities within six months of the and of each f ieal year. This Annual Report U required to contain Information on the following: o Activities which Involved participation by the Agency in FY 1985 /86 and a 4 description of the revenues and Indebtedness of the Agency; c o Comparison of actual Agency achievements with the work program goals Identified In the Annual Report for PY 1986/851 0 Proposed work program goals for FY 1986/87; 0 All agency activities Impacting housing; h? 0 A copy of the Audit Report for PY 1985/86; 0 An opw. lon from the Agency counsel regarding the Agency's compliance with the laws and regulations governing redevelopment. EVALUATION: In order to comply with the reporting requirements, otatf has prepared an nnual i port for FY 1985/86 for tNj Agency's consideration. This report contains all of the information required by State law. Once accepted by the Agency, It will be sent to the appropriate State agencies. Deputy Executive Director JL /OJ/kap attaehmenb Annual Report FY 1985/86 rltr'rr f t9Y " ANNUAL REPORT +(it REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA °I FOCAL YEAR 19NI" ' g. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION IL FISCAL STATEMENT FOR ACTIVITIES DURING FISCAL YEAR 1985/88 DL COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEAR 1984/85 WORK PROGRAM GOALS WITH ACTUAL ACHIEVEMENTS OF FISCAL YEAR 1985/88 IV. WORK PROGRAM GOALS FOR FISCAL. YEAR 198d/87 V. AGENCY ACTIVITIES AFFECTING HOUSING VI. AUDIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985/89 VII. AGENCY COUNSEL OPINION LETYBR OF COMPLIANCE W1fH LAWS AND REGULATIONS 1 a IN L INTROPUCTION This Annual Report is Intended to satisfy the requirements of the California Health and Safety Code, beginning with Section 33080, as It pertain to the activities of the Agency through fiscal year 1985/88. This report recognizes the fourth complete Ils¢al year of the Agency's existence and will consider the followhq itemes M"usslon of the Agency's activities during fiscal year 1985/88. This discussion r Includes a description of the revenues and Indebtedness of the Agency. - A comparison of the achievements of timed year 1985/88 with the goals outlined In the Annual Report for fiscal year 1984/85. - A work program for fiscal year 1988/87. - A description of the Agency's activities affeoting housing and displacement, - An Independent financial audit report for fiscal year 1905/88. - An opinion from Agency counsel regarding the Agency's compliance with the laws and regulation governing redevelopment. IL FISCAL STA'f73YRNT FOR AC" IY177RS DURING FISCAL YRAR 1985188 A. Major Programs ;1 r 's >r•.Ft i I During the period of July 1985 through June 1986 the Agency participated In six major development projects or programs. These are described as followsi Y Day Craek /Mello Roos Program, in an effort to relieve flood hazards In certain portions of the City the Redevelopment Agency worked closely with the City, the County of San Bernardino, the City of Ontario and various property owners to establish a Community Facilities District In fiscal year 1983/86. In fiscal year 1985/88, an $18 mBldon bond Issue was closed, the proceeds of which will' be -wed to construct a major flood control facility. As a part of the bond structure, under the terms of a Lcen and Pledge Agreement between the Agency and City, the Agency has committed a portion of Its tax Increment revenues towards debt service for the bonds. This Agency contribution helps to reduce the per acre special assessment to the property owners. Design work for this regional flood control facility Is underway. Construction Is expected to begin In FY 19. "87. Mortgage Revenue Bond Proarami Prellminary work for the Issuance of Home Mortgago Revenue Bonds was completed In fiscal year 1985/800 anticipating a 1986 Issue. However, because of the uncertainty raised by the potential Impact of federal tax reform, no allocations were made by the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee. With the recent passage of tax reform, the Agency Is exploring with Interested developers the possibility of structuring a sale of a Single Family 5lortgagb Bond program by December, 1986. Foothill Fire Protection District: During fiscal year 1985i86, the Agency participated with the Foothill Fire Protection District In the following aream -2- I a ,e Y 1. Aerial Ladder Truck Company - The Agency entered Into a contract for the purchese of an aerial ladder truck to provide primary service to the rap.dly davelopitq,' Industrial area. 2. Fire Station Number f, Remodel and Addition - bt order to provide adequato facillrles for the new truck company, the Agency authorized a budget allocation of S227,000 from the 6ancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Fund (Fund 25) to pay for the remodel and expanslolt of Fire Station Number 2. 9. Memorandum of understanding (Piro Protection Capital Improvements Program) - In February 1990, the Agency and Fire District executed a Memorandum of Understanding to define the respective rotes and duties In the preparation of a Capital Improvements Program which will be a framework for the development of new fire protection facilities to service now development In the Project Area. The Firo District Is now preparing an assessment of present and future needs for fselllties, which will than be reviewed by tho Agency to determine finanuing needs and availability. Msrketlna Promotlorm During fiscal year 1995/99, the Agency contrnoted with The Marketing Connection for development of a presentation package which vtould be used In p ^omoting the City to potential businesses and /or residents. The package Includes a \� PA presentation folder, Informational brochure, specific handouts, and stationary. -3- r"� M r n s' 1. A Y. o! M OPA 84 -1 In November, 1985, The Owner Participation Agreement between the Agency and the Ernest Hahn Company was amended to allow up to a maximum 18 month extension In the time of performance. Thus, the anticipated 1988 Tax AHoeatlon financing was postponed to the next decal year. Nel rborhood Conservatlent In conhraction with the set rslde of funds for improving and Increasing the supply of affordable fkusing In the community, as required by Section 33334.2 of the Health and Safety Code, tle Agency Nut Identified thirteen (13) neighborhood capital Improvement projects which will be financed either on a pay -as- you-go balls, or through a bond financing mechanism. In conjunction with this program, the Agency entered Into a Reimbursement Agreement witn the City to provide the financing for file qualified projects. Under the terms of this agrooment, the City will construct throe of the qualified neighborhood conservation improvements, at a cost not to exceed $3,350,000. B. Fiscal Analysis A fiscal analys!a of the Agency Is shown, In part, on the attached Statement of '+ iralebtedups. Briefly, th- total. outstanding Indebtedness for the Project Area, as of June 30, 1985, was $28,292,785. This total debt is a eombinallon of loans from the City, Interest on the loans and the total payments of the Taut Allocation 84 -1 Issue over the 30 year life of the bonds. In fiscal year 1984/85 the Agency received a total of $2,491,878 In tax increment ` revenue. The majority of this revenue Is used to pay esisting debt obligations. The .'t Agency Is also required to set aside 20% of the tax Increment received pursuant to :'dFs -4- \i Section 33334.2 of the Health and Safety Code. There are two special districts which receive direct payments from the Agency when tax Increment Is received. Those two dIstrlots, Cucamonga County Water District and Chirac basin Municipal Water District, receive revenues pursuant to peso -thru agreemenl� , executed at the time the Project Area wat formed. These pass -thru payments are used by the districts to meet capital and bonded Indebtadnuss obligations. L-. fiscel year i 1984/85 a total of $164,406 was geld to these special districts pursuant to Section 33401(b) of the Health and Safety Code. 13. COYPARf80N OF FICAL YEAR 1935/N WORK PROGRAM GOALS WFrU ACTUAL ACfIDMMEHIS OF FWAL YEAR 1985/84 r ' no Annual Report for Meal year 1985/88 Identified six prograto areas to which the Agency would devote the majority of Its efforts In fiscal year 1985 /88. These areas Includodt Day Creek /Mello Roa Flood Control Program, Foothill Piro Protection District, OPA 84 -1, Certificates of Participation, Single Family Mortgage lords, and Investigation of the development of an Auto Plaza. As Indicated In Section 11, these goals have been substantially met. IV. WORK PROGRAM. GOALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998/97 D-mIng thin next year, the work program will consist of Implementing the projects which have been prioritized in the Redevelopment Plan. Thus, projects begun during the rest year will receive further Implementation and other projects will be considered ►.a they relate to the overall goals got forth In the Redevelopment Plan which Includes 1 1� L Protect and promote the sound development and redevelopment of blight areas as deflned in Bee.tlon 33030 through 33032 of the Health and Safety Code. 2. Assure that projects In the Project Area provide assistance In alleviating Physical and economic barriers to development in the redevelopment area. 3. Assure that projects wlthln the Project Area are In conformance with the City's General Plan goals. 4. Assure that projects in the Project Arse provide for balanci:d and orderly development. 8. Provide for assurance of adequate tax Increment to help finance Improvements In the Project Area. The followir.' Is a summary of the projects and goals anticipated to be Implement •d during the fiscal year 1886/87. P!YCreek /Mello Roos Program: The Agency Intends to commit financlally to the project by pledging a minimum of 5500,000 annually towards debt service on the binds. The pledged amount will help to reduce the per acre special assessment of the property owners. The Agency will pay the minimum pledge from a tax Increment revenue fund which is targeted for the purpose of developing regional flood control facilities. This tax Increment fund is pursuant to the Pass -thru agreement executed between the Agency and the County of Batt berntardino at the time the Project Area was formed r.. Tlf •K { \ •t5l F8 ` • gf.- TA 88 -1: During fiscal year 1888/87, the Agency anticipates the Issuance of new tax allocation bonds for the finanelnq of several projects. Preliminary computation of projected tax Increment Indicates the Agency could service the debt on an Issue of •; approximately $32 million. OPA 94-1r A portion of the proceeds of TA 88 -1 will be used to sat9ty the final portion i of the Agency's commitment under the terms of OPA 84 -3. These '• ptv ^.eat will be used r for engineering and inttal4tlon of Infrastructure improvements associated with the � d3velopment of the regional shopp!ng center by The Hahn Company. ' Public Safety /ClOo Peellltyi A portion of the proceeds of TA 88 -1 will be used to finance the construction of permanent City facilities. Design work for both facilities is underway. W Home Mortgage Revenue Bond Finanrinir As Ind'' -eated in Section 11, prellmincry work for a now Issue of Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds has already been accomplished. To the Went that such financing Is available following the adoption of federal tax reform legislation, the Agency Intends for putlolpate In the program. !` Foothill PIre Protection District: Agency activities wN, affect the Piro District will be focused on the following programs: 1. Memorandum of Understanding (Fire Protection Capital Improvements r Program) - Tho Agency will continue to work with the Fire District to i develop a comprehensive, long range plan to provide adequate fire -7- ;3 d- < e protection to the Project Area. 1. Hire Dlstrlot ..an Checker - In order to assist the Pire District In Y #� providing adequate review of building p's"t- in a trmaly feshion, the a r Agency will enter Into a contractual aorangement with the Fire District r, for specific commitments to plan review and plan ehWk activities In the project area. The contract will provide for retention rf one plan chock Jreview person by the Fire District, with s, matching commitment of additional City pro a mnal. i Markotlmt Promotions[ The Agency Intanas to develop an audio visual marketing program for use In cordunction wit' thv presentation package developed during fiscal year 1885 /ES. Y " Certificates of Particioationt To the extent that Certificate of Participation financing is available after the adoption of federal tax reform legislations, the Agency intends to net as a conduit for the financing for Interested develops. W Neighborhood Corzervetlont Under the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement which the Agency and Cit; Jscouted in PY 1885/88, he Agency has committed to relmbursa the City up to $3,350,000 for the coat of const ticUng throe of tho qualified neighborhood conservation Improvements. The Agency Intends to examine the possibility of financing future neighborhood conservation protects through the sale of a tax allocation bond. Redevelopment Plan Amendment[ Tex Increment projections reveal that the Agervy Yell reach the tax Increment limitation established by the Redevelopment Plat In FY t, -8- % 1 X ;+^W V 2 1987/88. Additionally, the bonded Indebtedness limitation contained In the Plan will not allow the Agency to use bond financing to complete the projects to which it has Identified. For these reasons, the Agency intends to begin Plan Amendment proceedings In FY 1988/87 V. AGENCY ACTrm= APPSC7'Qfo RODSD4o '.h r During fiscal year 1985/88 no households or families containing persons of low or moderate Incomes were displaced or moved from their dwellings as a result of Redevelopment Agency activity. In addition, the Agency does not expect to dtaplaca or move any low and moderate Income households and families from their dwellings durini fiscal year 1988/87. During fiscal year 1985/88 no dwellings housing persons and families of tow and moderato Income were removed from the housing market as a result of Agency activity. Except for those first time home buyers who participated in the Agency Single Family Mortgage ' Bond Programs, no Agency assistance was provided for the construction, rehabilitation, fi acquisition or subsidization of affordable dwelling units to persons and families of low and moderate Incomes The Rancho Redevelopment Project Area was formed in fiscal year 1981/82 and, -, therefore, must comply with Section 33334.2 to 33334.5 of the health and Safety Code. This Section requires that an Agency set asido 20% of all tax Increment revenue racaived '. from a Project Area for improving and Increasing the community's supply of affordable 5 housing. To date the Agency has committed a portion of this fund to assist In the �x 3a' development of a senior citizen project (Calmark developer agreement, refer to fiscal I+ i Year 1983184 Annual Repo), Additionally, rosts tha tructuroytmprovemo �agrcement with the City, and hlch to for lnfres relmbursed tot to certain h w the he City' tdentltlaDlo neighborhoods Y. up to $3,350,000. Yalldation o� will be Proposed Imp- ovement costa w01 Proceedlrt 9uallfy as Ie !is b Insure that the Safety Code, are underway, eitmeto deb-, or defined by the Health and The Agency has Identified thirteen WeNflad Intaady to finance through the use of neighborhood conaerveif pro /e¢ta which it continue to the 20X set e8ide funds, T e•+.d. +t In completing these projects, either through bond Issue, or � Agency intends to through successive reimbursement the sale of a tax allocation agreements with the City. VL AUDIT FOR F SCAL e "81985180 In accordance with C Ac oeV�O Agency hired the Health o and Safety Code, Section 33080.1(a) t pment untanb to Lance, Sol he Redevelopment complete an examination financial o >, k Lvnghard, Certified PuDNa 1980. �9ent y of Rancho Cucamonga r of the Agency of the City ec0� and transactions flnanclat audit, as for the year ending iledevelo Prepared g June 31, Pment Agency, is attached m by tho auditor and Pert of this submitted to tiro roPort. s VIl' AGENCY COUNSEL OPINION 1WOULATIONS X88 OP COrPUAN� N1TH LAWS AND I In accordance with C41L ""4 Health and Safety Code, Section 33080.1(a), an opinion, i� y 4 e P' k' i is LI letter from the legal counsel for the - Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is attached to this annual report. The opinion letter Indicates the Agency's ; "3 compliance with the laws, regulations and administrative requirements which govern the activities of tho Agency. 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 1986 I -m RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPSENT AGENCY u ESTABLISHED MAY 20, 1981 ' GOVERNING BOARD 1 I ^+ Jeffery Ring Chairmen - i Charles J. Buquet ZZ Jon D. Mikels Pamela Wright t Richard M. Dahl n OTHER OFFICIALS �v. Lauren H. Wasserman Executive Director/ secretary + Jac)< Lam Degtty Executive Director Jim Hart Treasurer John Brown Legal Counsel ti NIZI y4yjti -4'+? yy A f y� t.Xff4 yAv •r. arm w�°• tiSr� ,.�j'S :S�.Yii..i:�1,. _+x -"h. - .2- RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVEIAPHENT AGENCY to f TABLE OF CONTENTS r Page Number :. AUDITOR'S OPINION - Financial Audit 1 - Compliance Audit 3 h EXHIBIT A - Combined Balance Sheet - All Govern- mental Fund Types and Account Groups 5 ;- y r tr EXHIBIT B - Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Chingos in Fund - Balances - All Governmental Fund Types 5 ` EXHIBIT C - Combined Statement of Revenues, s Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Governmental Fund Types - Budget and Actual 7 '! NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS g b SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule 1 - Combining Balance Sheet - All Debt Service Funds 28 +� schedule 2 - Combining statement of •Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund S Balances - All Debt Service Funds 29 Schedule 3 - Co- dining Balance Sheet - All Capital Project■ Funds 30 S, :hedule d - Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Capital Projects K o Funds 31 Schedule 5 - Statement of Trustee's Cash Receipts, ' ° Disbursements and Transfers - Tax C r Allocation Bonds, 1980 Series A 32 - :•'# `pert Ff" .� I . r Lance 7200 6 Greenleaf AVG. Soli & SWte 266 \(2(213)r698672702 I V {: as CERTIFIED iU6UC ACCOUNTANTS Governing Board Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Rancho Cucamonga, California Financial Audit Report fi aftDr. rrcrwvc fl e DrN}Y, W' swans owe L v n., We have examined the financial statements of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, a component unit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of and for the year ended June 30, 1986, listed in the foregoing table of contents. our examination was »` made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and ouch other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the '.� circumstances. In our opinion, the component unit financial statements referred to above present fairly the financial position of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (a component unit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga - Ho_c 1) at June 30, 1986, and the results of its operations for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and the accounting system prescribed by the State Controller's office and state regulations governing special districts, applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year. our examination was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the component unit financial statements. The supplementary schedules listed in .:he foregoing table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and arc not a ` auto pV wra.DwsxarV as cvvv,m nrcc,cmrrrum f, - MtrK.�ir p1,IVI1 C/CLMVtD,NUD MNIM.wIi ufe ; !flnfKO _ $Op�66`` N'" �{i1MSa\ICCDV.141! ` ' � 4 Y•f Governing Board Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment + Agency Financial Audit Report Page 2 required part Of tho component unit financial stateaants'of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Such information has baon subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the examination of the component unit financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all-material respects in relation to tt component unit financial statements taken as a whole. October 22, 1985 r 1 JJ - N; . • '1 • f txOa7 r. IY , r�t LHmce 7200 S. OreaNealAre s $F�I1�, SWIa It0 w�HaG 6a1 ,. xl LLu- ngh4. \Y/(M) 0867202 tna W 0a, .M (213)69B6T2T 6r^aa^W �'^'4 CER -IFIEO PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS oo�.0 NOV 4„ M ' a v coverninq Hoard ' Y Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment } Agency Y° Rancho Cucamonga, California . avo.w�aan an.mn,wlc.xamrum ': :." }i;, . � ue,w+r.nmuna an.ia nA..e lommum compliance Audit Report i• He have examined the financial state.�ents of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, a component unit of the City of 1r: Rancho Cucamonga, as of and for the year ended June 30, 1986 and 't,• have issued our report thereon doted October 22, 1986. our k examination was made in accorda-.he with generally accepted auditing standards and included such testa of the accounting 7� y1 records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. As part of cur review we have completed a compliance examination as required under Section 33080.1 of the Health and k. Safety code of the state of California. our compliance, examination was made An accordance with the State of California, r5 State Controller Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs, j °a Guidelines for Compliance Audits of California Redevelopment ., s, rr Agencies and included such other tests and procedures as we r $, considered necessary in the circumstances. � . avo.w�aan an.mn,wlc.xamrum ': :." }i;, . � ue,w+r.nmuna an.ia nA..e lommum MtK 3 , 4nal+er�'aa.,.,ra F Governing Board Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency 1' Compliance Audit Report Y, Page 2 a l Zn our opinion the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has complied with laws, regulations and administrative kuditcea f C as contninedLL Sn the Guidelines for-' Audits of Calilornla Redevelopment Agencies, of the State of California, governing its activitie June 30, 1986. s for the fiscal year ending October 22, 1986 a v ' �3 -14, i r rn rh . � d1� 1 i �\ 1f �} � [ � ! . =4i I � 2j 3' /� • �& | |(�•.]jj. / ; !� | . lilt ve. § !! / } � $� \!} \tea / [ � ! . =4i I � 2j 3' /� • �& | |(�•.]jj. / !� lilt ! . I � ! 3' /� • �& F / J , }�# ! e� �£ \ ! .] �- / ƒ ! ' ° " � \ f , }@�pmm 2222��1g� I , i ~q�� \ -��} ' 2 # � ®-Q v _ kZ rt 41 f p u I n °C QY ° i diS ' r ivy' ` » •�.r .t Y . .�• CO Y ' :`�`�� � �. .I � $r: a �e � w � •A r•I � � �, �a� •'� pi It It It Y cJO � » YYYj11111 » ( � ON,w � � I � - O u� •• C Z » L = @ Sv 4 ° K o Y It, .. dui. il5 is u• EP . °J L o r r' � � °c:'�F�` —��:' •°.: PS�... `>' •� ' „gym HE vl� •` r � Y a� I ` §! .lei]§ , ��� ■ §� -� q«m§ � � }� .. ■5% // ! | § |■ �|( §_ }��!} i | :. k- |— -72��l — ;_ : = i2r H.; /� � J/ • I r 0 i qu M aa�tt HU 1J 00 G UL OY GY q M CC go a DO U q q y° yy z a 0 Cr q O 31 a.0 01 a.°'i L m�M m OM Mq�w .°.0 41 ~N uq +� y; O N O q O O ■ 7 ., p NNvm mo,+ U a' aN1, 0 U u°ON W O� +mi .Fl ° A G ti W n :444J t~ G y� to m O~u Nogw C aNp �'�S' a ba'°" 4 b' bi i4 •� c U � 7 m 0 O OL J0 j O q O y 0 � d Y4 dyW ° uc u� w �a� o ; v°ti aria "$M Lw 4 e Jy >•ml L O� V,= O >m m o 4� co = aU �a �4� w & o s fo o .n� aa �w R DEC o S n a uN c 4°° ° 1 V u •� � ° C O q O o y■44 G `" O Y m O � Aa qqaA 7 C ° G O 0 0 4 G ® O 0 q $'OH ° d S r a aU Gm�qd + H % 'G u ' G 0 oi F C da 41 rb a U m O t 0 w St°N C A Ma>C 4 OGq o fl tU i � .G F O q V O y� [QdO + U O ie O 0 O `dF -4r d 0 c 4 (Oj ON A04 m m y° m .Gi u O v V M a° b� S u gu y N a t7 0 H tr c q a m o a� N q- n iw +0 O 0 o D m ~ cu b K; o moil, TI 0 w' aNi 0 0 0 0 g" ~aN tltt p•.~j .� 61 i.i tgnci awu °j u a avi C H mU 4+ �cu^igom o 4 ��p J� '0-° Nu 99 pa u m ® q U ° �Qa�uOS mM OPA O%i to M O !Tw jw c m, �'u+N+ N'mq % u q mt ma my, Wu y Hf ' -. m4 m w n,y pc °° 7iy mo....a my °avm oO r. b�C O NOG it �qM q 4 O. b 4 q ^t q a+0 noy Wu 0007 �M4 vyr1� O q N M Jf� � � pc i+ W y 9 i r, 0 ° iO u a ti m .rta c a+0 noy Wu 0007 ~q ~ qO uAa V 0 b O q N M Jf� � � pc V y 9 i q N 1 { " Y p 4 '04"u m I iJ 'C uNw� ° m ~q ~ qO 0, O q N M Jf� � � p m c 0eJ` O M v N y 9 i CC p' U gLTV c I�r m yqp go m 0 0 A4P. t�gaSma+�m Am�ymmo04 N y L am m A m N U N +m+ W V h p� �A m m Mfg C ~S w N C p •~y ma q m � o u N �uyo. q Owm d M = +. y p a is � A c v O q y am% � •a m L qv + om ° m a as 4 X a � A c v O q y am% � •a m L qv OOIG 's. m m M U O W OI U 4 U W b U tl w � y Y O 4U tl L O y N > aG 0y o A; a a a� H 0 e B G � UP o" .G a C0 L = x° M m — o y b m ,a,Gom k-UO U �i q m G'V. •U ., G� q y Y a JJ 4j 4 Co 0 V 4 U m U X b p Y'Y ' a�tlou C dL ■ m CF Ly dp0 4U.G Fl 00>�^1 q m y ,U^ U sy a.. mmy4+t i'r%i tDpgC! Olab Nm b0 Amm V mU� 0 as a m O'.%w .ti ' m m M U O W OI U 4 U W b U tl w � y Y O 4U tl L O y N > aG 0y o A; a a a� H 0 e B G � UP o" .G a C0 L = x° M m — o y b m ,a,Gom k-UO U �i q m G'V. •U ., G� q y Y a JJ 4j 4 Co 0 V 4 U m U X b p S• 0 ' a�tlou C dL ■ m 4 m U d m U 0 >YOp'iaS a b 0 g Y U C UY 0 G y � X14Q100,b His mCU n m u U Z 0� .., yO m „s Y, +4yr�q Uip r + i ~a O W xOL w O p tl m U 0 O -M�� ok JM O- G 4) Np Cm0 , m m O 0 4 ��� m bp b iiss m m O > a CY aU is>� b!'wm Y0 41 y ym+. -1Omm a CG G a m U i p� �.u~ 4 mb 010 A 0yJ a lmi �.Ga a, A-0 a. OUO OV m~ sy •C q Y eG O iL JJ ocoplu as CA.py �M�a u p1V C7Y b•q >U m �Cm Ga� o 9 a , yaj i8,4 yyU . b 14 0 �p UA .1mJaa n m 0 w 01449 ~!•L aw Qa+mji YHWm•�0 ,�i`Ua ~q mv aU MO"N s w yyyymssssWp " y 0 A O o a k m U o 0 �jU bY n a 0 am U + .x0 la U G ~ U O N U 63 % aw o nu e q ..o Y Up � q Oq a OJ W O -0G4G tio bOpO Q 0 'Mal ,G AOww Um , Ww14 Am-0 4, CO! C zt,m tnu C41 J, V., ar7w m >1110 • mmLmA■ �4Lpoo[[77Hyy �}ap!1 0 0tgsu p1 mc� 0-00 00 � p,Ip01 dN y040 0 C�OyG�N � i Na no y 0 a O.7i 0 V D .qi 7(a , M 4J10{1 Oj it U U 4) U g C m>�O CJI ,�010 01 7 p �F la m > ve Ooil tit, C m > 0 U X93 U G� O U= 0f SOH m -6-m OIIY °gW 7�0 T1 0 sG MyC �'ONCMm'�Y 4 0. 10 ji pM C 1~ 0 b .00 G ~ m m 41 U41 �11q00 �1 .4 0g o, 3� o im W ° q4M I 3 .0 vtl 1 0 4 i °' �� aOO . vam?G 4a be�° 82 mm ° 9 4j = y . v e u m m ow mo is 5-d mIm W 04 >1 0� v ,NO q.�1�a o.�i'q~'.y� Apm tip' �.OpC 017031 'Cp0 H'O Ups, 'Qq 11 �yMU O G 4V m N OU�m U >m 4 U S ~ 1 y C ^M 0 C 00 41 e �°e , N U m C It 0 U U O C O m0 G ° A 3u0 O g gQ° wg W" %4 ° H c OOp O>a a A1i 0: Cq C Wma OO'y O C w 1 �N ti 0 .m1 041 O,mmU�o 0.'.1 L mm Ly°01 'ImOm > Ow N .mi O10x1mA .CAONm'or°1 PU C qm 0 C C ¢1 go U � o p ° 31 .oG C u 301 02 z° 197 N� H G r m C �C u "5 °0 rl 0 N V N C4 A 0 i TO G C O 0 6O 94, 80 0 N ,fir m G.0 0 O xz 0 ° z �r cab• ^bQ ~410em��r�oNoF EtMi >qm NF >y/0 7>,mQ W� HqQ O'7 n'ayCy m'w� O p�Y .~j�41 [9"j m.10 vco U00 of m+°%�.yN dtl� ofp we TfoR FCI�a��AIn A$, .0 i;5 ..CpNCi��oo Igo ej q m 0:0 TN�.{G O ~�j .yeN} 0%� V „u bm q o mb u " > aroj�gg WO 0 0014 �Or 'QQ ,OcQAZ,moa >�° 0.G Sam +5 >$° Aw Am, O .1 atl N m on 0 04J 6T7 OOw F:o 0>0 41' G b 4 .10 p NE OI dd ..mmOiAM mOyyWG mp 'cC b �W'y O .�i Mr°m H WO —." C ^ my O 'OOL i 4m./ ETTA 'a�OM O g1!50001400Ol C m 0 -0 j9 0 CA"� O j{ mGYYtlo� m mF N W O:.w 02O.7Tpf >yC y 0 �pyCO G m40 A� 4mist O m ,0� 0 N 064.0 0.O O'ZZ O,�O, U� H m �jCY oNJmi �.o..s� °y aoa4N �y7. 7m +AOi oy G ~�OO~Q mm 0 >.~i O NF.�O'Iy Nt1' T ^0..1 tl0 {. m C CppqIy-I 0 �M L7 M' 0m >: *m MO A 0m GB+i ~w C wO x°xi.1C $0 om O a. 0J.+pO Wr 003111 O m6v N Om 3a a I .�i V i q {{�� qq ds �1 1. OG 4j Aj O !; p>4Ma4 d H Muw qM IDL m O U �p C 9 am ID m C qM �u u G 4j" &4 um c 0 0 77::yy y tl[:N Y,,ppHG • V4" S Otl�qy,ID Op q A.. i.,. 0:0 0 0� 4J uVO q .� ,0 M VO pA ' :3 q 1NAj w a O U A 0.0 0 pm N U ID 0 Vv 14 41 u F ®M tl ti u V tl H o m O C d H 00 U pGtr 7 m 1 U Q" u k ~ m M m 6 u Y r 4J q a 4 0, u M q a . O 01 ."J l or m 5, O .A U OaID u O �m M a U 4tly O m V s 4J 0 p— V O " a C� ow G gpq �V V H 4 'a va uIDC 7O G m $4N9. q S %OJq ± ClC a � �o o A. t0 o ay 041 a qm 00 .e ~ 'Aat C m u MC W N q V m 'p a+ m 2 'yu, 0 Iqi C..�i ."� u m G y� 6,GOm Gqu YI Um vo yO' ptl,O� 'yO 31 •Ii 'dm O m O �iW Hw CM WU%4 O4416tl O- C19 .. tl G u M 0 v C. u UUU w Raj A � V j *, mu C G 00 N C CI '4r 1 u M o a 4O' o v L'o o .0m 14 �. 4 o a z tl u z 33 Y ,0. H n 0 c 35�' 4 QMOUM -4,E�poa SO Qe�uyp° c. ; C6 .0 V 14 u �i mS0 X mw Ap.iO U O . .-. yppy uvv ti wA'aV HCT W O ttO YO aC01� r O �O p0-0 0 7 44 qy LO OO .0 1 u4 y }N p 00 pyy H..7iO C3� �O a tl to, y Tti Or m; li. M7 f HM01 OIMn ry O•b U1NPtD � b yf m OO.f t•MN v N K OOOOpp om !W t y N'om wrv,f f l�4 H N N Mq O b C y p b N -+ a " c (pyD ybj 0 m `� ffl MfrPMf• ry O b� -0 C V•Mp 000M•D n •f ry .1 F . • to 7 o N wmM D r .7z "s JJ f •yV b �•. O Ol b A O yf s 4 pH O' N N N C 41 ON if yo> >�C q m '+ O "O it m N U > L b +r'j 7 U O +1 Z m m 7 •-�, J+CJ1 O b H m H �I 2 N py p, • N, m0 4 V m y b1 x UO 1 G Cm G G ti0 p wl Tf b ?'.. @Y %f4 Mal 4j"•"fOD C ly O�m pW > U M U M N •-mj yy fLpm� `• we m if m W �N A m q m0 y0•CSHm M S q G Cm um AH1Xt4W Om q wN LL 'O co m H m a H u m 0 m.� B �O O m "bU 4"n •• rim ry az° o r z ,y -wt 3s `f141!•Ir�. '��t'.ti��].CiI44'![ #1'FuR.1' X'l 2 Y / O N O N 'd b L' •. 0! d O N o v �w =Gw=N A y $ q�F ow Y G 1 = m N xi q H m m d0 =a A tr, a+ d i�• �+ cy '_ � F tn.0 o q I v p� Y X11 O ry p J�A .7t =,_ _ O o7 O 0 Fr 0 ~ O p'P • ,4 Y m a apd 5:4xyx r pOq r or" i C „SO A waw+$x, 4.g aDo Rw m �W +01 O q p y'0 �O d9y A.wi g °” =m°aS po Or W r-di d O O :0, fJ .~I ed q ,pwla f� y 7 Nq m 0.0 d, }pmt d OJ m0dd C C aL C U H.0 Ly ry CUsm Or 4 .UO.. 0 9 8 :5 O O G O D a - 4j, Ll w 0' l.4 0 0S M i m ~Nw ®_ � Q 0 q+pO2 00 a aW l M O r• ? > a \ . q 9 d L r4 M q F N L d 900,00 (p > w o O b j f 0 .0 10 v 014 0 94 b q mT 0 LLr•0-1 r O .1Y O -O C q d M w O R C p.O p 1 U b m oN010 9 0 Um0 d 14 0 U41 ti C OL CCC d ttN 77N= W ail. �} t• J m d 't. = d 0 N O p Ix z lip 4?Y �t � Il M Q aw C O q m L n ro d x d U m ` I ,1�,c,,gy77�IIIIt ro A m co H d em al m T5 0 C ml . tai E to W ro >4 ci K y (A N m.^ m 0. N Oq L M A' Otl d q ��0011 ^' UN yd d�q~ 1 O i m U` -00 N U C Go) x d Y1 y ! .l N W 21 . d N 0 C ro y 0 N d U ?' d y my M� j• n Nb pu m0 0, ro ral 1gNY.711 p' Aa f 11 0 d w 0 w t !.0 G N�1 o� 1 r I CCI C 41 Ow N N 9 H N m O a O qC m c O pl C a V b-, dw m 0. ro T f au yG g�o 11 0 •�i 13 N ' 06 d Y NIP. ,tid a d[,tl C .1 0t 0 11 U dT 4 p O 0 m C O tB ^ j 1 ro Y d W d TU 0 00 0 4J 90iU41 U a C N yy8 . pD V dV W U 14 0 AC; U H ! U o F+Ci y U D u p000 Ai 4 `1 O -UC OM 2 GY a z N o z 0 A "l.Y Via` U w{ C yt KU my Oil to a ,ti 0 a °ca u4 go O C+m+ n= A O ja ti F U 4 9 h 0 m 0 V V o a4ammm a of Q�m 0, . ,0 2 OC 9 U 4,y ai°�tiO .um 5 a a� O to dqy -0 0 0400 o AO lj' mu" 0 ° Vqa •1A Ty1 c0,+10.0 qq0 7 ~OmMR to CO a0 N"°mo V y m q a V 14 O Gb y O0 C: b 4 O 4g0obp0 a S N'00.0 qM m G.. Tppl jjw�.,y a00 m O} ate 0 M. n1 $up C Vu 4 ti. T U C m *X44 00 0f1 34 to h 4a0q t, Oa J4 -0 y y ¢ 4 m O 0a O 0 4,Ai o �ti.O c N m h G a ~ d w�q 1+A c LL mH0 cp ti A. to m o k�i'A4 "Gl 0 u to 0 e0 0 04" 0 U" a 4C 44r�, h~ ma V m°^l00 4~ m a m b 9A �> H C": ° 0 a a x � M g q K O x a M 33' O L d Q N M N M M N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N F �O�ggqplq0, a p°oo °po p0 o °p0 o °o°pp O ot°uWib°uh,O Ooa H t?Nt?Nfh N(/}yyy `�bhmq HH.y rlggqqqq ?S r ,a. Y O O O In n n C H 0 i O Orit ,r,y1 mG1 X 04, 9[y iqN 0 m 0 Ap9A 0 00 y .O O !� q m C rJ b1 F 0 a W~ m 0 W m~ R C 0 O mq air. ap N m U m Nm Fj'G�A O O n H OMMJI q~ AWA L L11 OOOON w w %V w w w nmL 9Gf0J iJ m'1 y!N q m b I O 1y 010�Tn101 qqIm •• UO O� 0 0 y'$."H N -0 N I N O g1,dm 40 ,CU C m N m .0 c0 y1 y N °eam�yleu 'o' o000o y1 OO6NO?c,4' mw 00000 O,1kq UO G mo cc. U) V �O�O 0 xt .N1-r11 0M0 01 �qq @ �0 0 1h R NNNNN 01'J _ T1 p.0 .0 1Jy O mJO�NU m,yN C1N Mm Pa 1 1mL.�OBrl .1I1 �U .- oil q +^+' oo,cmmmaw a 010 0 •a m m '^I 'a o am'a9w>iomn a y u myz;007 mim qq a o0 �m B 00 WP VS motamm 01A UV 1ad -w00 Q 02.4c y U, '0 U MMAON 0 U m mL {1 40 7 q G� �9.r CFyy 0tw �yy �q F1 yQ P. 0 A�N wY CG 1� Ui1 p0.0i W.0 mN 00 F04 V-0 -.10a 77m O W `i4iN HO Cq G 0a s A go O v1 40 U 0 0 CV ° Y a z° zm O O O In n n C H 0 i O Orit ,r,y1 mG1 X 04, 9[y iqN 0 m 0 0 0 0 N m n tl} O O 0 0 N N I N N O O O In n n C H 0 i O Orit ,r,y1 mG1 X 04, 9[y iqN 0 m 0 o' m o � O O i = G O 00 i01 m1tl NYln N01 riNN +'�j 0 (� i! ' tON1f1MN 31 rmmmm t Y N ydj0 •� �o n { n 1 p m m N ^ a� b cocoa mmmom N m N m N G o 0 y O 0 N c c o W ro O 0 C o o a 0 0 A 0 m i { 7 C o ANN M t L• G Y �� N N N m O y�pl N 4 Q .f G L Tp1 m it U m O d 104 °m V t's °a So > A 0 0 OM <maO.I T N U H 'v0 V yy C >1U +CIO �py '+Y 0 0 0 0 b O m r • d Y ba1 CO 11 U..� aU$4 U 0 r W1 0, mmmmmY 4N Y m O Y !, m cU Mal ?2+.+ O F o mmmmm MH..NH� Om F CC F t rnu H S oy w• O a m f B C C uw go s U i CG m m Y +Y qY S 2 'TA''((1k'�A� }i'J`tY, .�+'i x �2 '�' /.` ! ..A .1 ✓li!2 ��4E' 'AI '•a'1 [i �qq awe0 e4 .a Ar7 K K.00= O d 06ti tlG 4000 b �? a ,eq t2 0 04 HppO at W X00 $a.OiaL b1 C-.mi q cav aY0 S{ ~J Je!�a O n O OQI m 0 OO 00 C >L O>.0t e e O b O N �dC K 4-0 4a n ti ry eOO 0 W N fl m q t b r. V 1 d la'O M K b� G N N o xmgCpa ij Yd Ewyl pC 0..1 J 0 O e� V K;w 0:5 ev.. q EZ a > >'U Om'KA0 p2j'�a.b 4601 G� O J y 0 to O c a 0 4V v v �M O.p.1 00 Ce x"y KUIa 4 N O�u[O1 ,,KKa 0 0000 8 K aac -e/ ee y Kw _ 0 0 . >. !e� O> 0> CM y G �O1 cc tr O a K ■7 K O }"y O b O u+41 �7m +i�egryll a 11c tie U W 6 4 KV ' Ala mC y'mp�Z�O^ �0 Vb, Om °!p9p:C C.01 p0N tm Q C C � � q im o � ,p � U N0 41 0 q 'H 0 ma'. 0 O. /3 O �7 q� 9 ar7 0 ■ .U.. K"'10b 4 0 eQyU O.O " 007 eL LdAU jm0'+f i,y ym OK 94 O.". 1C GG ~0,W .1 mY 0 Lw m'tl .VV'oa000s, �qO ~py�.CCO 4aL d b g 0 >N 0 O q 0 +>I �YLO� 0 w H `m ❑. +1 KIMx 00 m F eM 4 C Kb a N ~6 U 10j p4OU 014 0:1b 0-00 q,C m uSiL O A E e c g K R m uu d 00 O e O 0 0 N m O m ro 1 b 0 MV Aw FUKip me NOON 'Qa"pl KO; .�1 Do0 ~KX ua a ux� u N N �a moo, p & \ 0 ` \ a " \/' tu= ,\ 17 �44 A �. - 0 14 /c `�E- //� }" ) . to �\ 2 = 2 �� §! ® k 2 = I /§/ El \ \ ) /� \ 3 0 we J /� / \7{ � / J/ f / ! fa . !; / ! moo, p & K ■ 1n 07 fin.. . u L 7' O C (. n y 4 [: o u° q �n c..J e c, C uw 80 N L N G L ap r, Obw uam mfr 4~ O~ ~ r V 2� u O � O e m N 0 � b'N � N +1 Z H m O �y 7 m q O q Y aHm O C m�O +1 00 U ;yN C O q u „ I l C woo 4 U ~ H _ Laj 0 �[ C p O % O G mY m H 1. o C OV O m ,. Y G U N p tim�we a o on tm. E�Id amn n O J+ a s 1 x5 >N a u u i a e ° � a; =�4r E , £4 I �f3 • 'z � •B ` `oS Z � C� � • �� � ��* ± y C i P�.� gg�� gipp• r « « o` N o � « tz . M « « « « S$ 5 � •B ` `oS �� S� N • �� � ��* ± y C i P�.� gg�� gipp• o` IN m m sm ° [pl @ 33077 m W O m y u 4 w +' m = m U � 4 N rl b 7 w 7p O a u 0 r. X a 0 O L ® C G Q to 4 @ .y O^� 3 u p H 1 � O W O U � p @ � C 4 woa H O @ a" ol m up 4 a 030 u N a H M " q m o d O mm M y0 M L i! N rl •.l S 0 N Q.Q �A ,y ti ti G N R � 0 0 +pi O ~ y O m 4 @p coo cm @ O vi U.y U V'a m •.mj 0 a, CL O 01 G H0 b b1 0 Or S�V•, q Ja 41 ti 00m 4 ma C ly O 9 C C � /� ti @ "U/ al ° a O U O ou 0 @ °�1 n 1 um of 7L Q m 4, 9fq .U.. p 4.N @ jb Chi cva ±+N a Y q UY (� 4jQ 70 a a" ~ � 2 a 014 -v ce 44 r� ,o, Hwp F'�m �W L' O d tai a O U n m au m co az 0 x° IN m m sm ° [pl @ 33077 m W O m y u 4 w +' m = m U � 4 N rl b 7 w 7p O a u 0 r. I X L ® C G O^� 3 u p H � O W @ � C @ m up a H M mm C rl V M ti ti R � 0 0 O ~ U rA N O m 4 @p 1aaJ vi H �r @ Y a, 01 � Oy,pn ly O O m yoa o 70 d tai a CO) 4 I ON m m ppi�ss " V040 UCYYPj 0 O F YaCamai ,Uy��rOC �.O �+O N OAHU t rp OO gry1J Y,C9C V "CocuC 0 A0'AO 0 0 0 040 =Oil S�Y4a' pp.K ;Q4ry m MyOJiF ~OH W.C'0�40mA000 b f0 H C 0 H y b e C g A m" N F O 4 9 0 pe m C .,y Y O �0 0 (T, Cl o W H o y ••1 os U1 C .qi ma AOim CY M. M i P.0 001,0 - ,CC C4m6 a TOOK ~••1 aY �p9�o•C4 Ao i� L TI C y 0 C x 0 y. n "� A A LL CA ~ 0 m W U A> r m I U C p Ym V h;~ o A O O C V p, C we XA bi Ar A.Y,,a CC ru �� C ■O K Y bC,C YIYMd>. q•p >.p O$N H ,nC O �=CJ . m~4Y Oo 40 , =JCO MOb>tl O Ow -.0 YV V �AopO ti VpYq AO C'OC,Am m'�o mL•V O. @ pp `YA 0 r M >C >>06m q`•�Mr7 '� Y do Ay4 W pjx�lmiYA o %'� MH 04„q�uy A,. w9 M 4 9 01 d F0 Am, N 4 >.A Cy:vKOOSOMY ;C CS tlC p 0 .v O pa p H W a{n` •- i./.Cm 0 7 X q U> CN yy0 0 uL�i���L0 p �F QPr OyA Qq'N 0 N Q8 y 'Q OCm 0ROOm a�pQga^M CXOY ago y�7ML CMOp OU U ^7 ~pMF0 f 0Y W d 0 H o 1. �C opN �w� moY.0 o0 C O ppO�� N NX•.V ,CO O X,04,0 B C.�[C; .0 YyKK O•LYo oy W 4 0 i b ~CK pA C...Q =mL C.0 C,Oy OC OD 0 OL Al 0 .b myj m N d0q mpppU.0071 aA" C.y C O OK o0 R Y W gyp�,o OH coo SAar P J. A S O 00 .00 .ml aa�yR rC 49n1�OC.mjCA C"� ar M C, 4Y x G. O� CA 0 0 i .40k t ii 0A Om .~i mU Vq K U.p �..pi.8 b q mp.j�y C+(X y voA4,r V'ti Fr E Omo•Y.1 ALL Mr A >tmo+oij !i up0 y pOq fi t0 UYf WJJ 0O .+0, %m 0F.�i O U Op O ` CY 0 00 L ax 0 / 0/ qj ƒ ƒ� # « / / ƒ / c % i 2 _' .. . ,. Cy af \ \ » . { � � �Ct C •i I I | •I I •I I | 4 /] }�] §\ A 32 �. . | -, � - ■__ -! 4, .� 00.0 , , , ' \ \ /yl� \� a§� IM - ' , . � { ,z �m �) } a , � . , J }Z R !ƒ y . \ � �]] . f \jj . % / ! �© k • � - / y \ 21 d �2 . . \ � � 2E 72 §! � � � ! RM ! / 22� J « � 2 � � ` R ! �� _ • \ \ - jS \ � r: M.'� a •. Wn.. W h Cw gyrK. L +w or, is e. BEST BES o., RNGt.O °eG� ep,.e 4 °teet September •, 1986 Vlt t1MOyr.l.W4lW. M.) TKO ..Atw 0..0. nr0 fenlii rouwb �yw Rl4 .4 s,R Oma. •Y40F0 M �• O• NI •OIO N.e NI CITYADMIN57RFTlGAMCN6A SEP " a AN O. Jr 985 "'•^ne 6. ++ +..y Lance Sol, a g and Suite S. Greenleaf Avenue Suite 280 Whittirr, G 90602 Ladies and Gentlemen: BY letter dated j.ly I n?hotrrnca in the PrDer Lion °f' lOBE, you re4usated our an Period ending Redav@loPment Age your Waal audit of the by reporting June 30, 1986. Th1e lette books and Of for the Pending lawsuits ,,Is reBFond financial h would s to your request c�nditton oP the A adversol any cent Of Agency and by Y affect the 4ent report Sa ge limited liabilities material in offering explanations of of June 30, ,986 to ratters within our know nature- The scope of this He wish and up to and includin ledge that existed as engagement by the to call your attention g the dace of this letter. Agency during to the fact that our specific matters 4 the Past Year has been sraY extin upon which the Agenc t legal matters which could affect the Agency,, financial a There c v J, aAw Orry c[[ Or SES T, BEST C, KRIEGER •• Lanco Sell A Lunghard Pago q�ee2• 1986 since June attenti on In the form whether Of legal rch services involve substantial to threatened litigation, claims andllo l`ation concer,,ing pending and ra geuc noted that we hnva made no ivde eseaents, Accordingly, It is f th 9'9 transactions or contractual Pendent review of eny of the response, atrangemen•:s for the purposos The information awn w this letter, and we disclaim any herein Ss as of the date changes which thnreafts ma ny undertaking to advise you "1 r,1t This letter is so Q1 a brought to ou' attentlo, u of r` Agency your review of events o£ Ra choyout lnformrtln to conne:tlon ! quoted which have Occurred after Jan Cucamonga Redevelopment fine in whole or 1 or Otherwise 30, 1985, and is not to be n Part ncial statement, of the referred to !n an Prior written with any 90 °ernl^entel agency elated documents, �r is it \ or Ither Person, ltegoiu e con letter gyheAgwn,•f• Notwithstanding the without 4. this Your court process or in conr tlo fished to others in compliance audit by the Agency, ° with any challenge regarding I BEST BE87 & KRIEOER Lance Sell & Lungherd September 2, 1966 Page Pour Please be advised that there are no billed but u tees for services rendered through , 1986 June 30 nPald . yours sincerely, John E, Brown of Brat, Best & Krieger Counsel, Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency JEBtjwr cc: Lauren M. Wasserman n `r - F aN of w+rztio ctrnMvc:l QTY OOUNCIL AGENDA L477 Lions Park Community Center ` 9161 Pass Line goad .- Rancho Cucamonga, California oeeember 3. 1986 - 7.30 0 '. All itemize submitted for the City Council Agenda amt be in writing. The deadlima for submitting these it 5:00 p.m. m the Wednesday prior to the wasting. The wq Clerk's office ramiwea all each items. 1. Pledge of Allegiance to flag. 2. Roll Call: 8rm _, Duquet _, Stout Ring _, and Wrlgbt _. 3. Approval of Iiinutes: .L Is AwwOORCyw= /PRRR Howe 1. Thursday, Jeceaber 4, 1986 - 7:00 p.m. - ADVI80Ry CONXI88I0H - Lions perk Commanit7 Center, 9161 Base Line geed. 2. Thursday, December 40 1986 - 7:30 p.m. - ?LABH1wG C61oassi m WOCROHOP - Rantbo Cucamovga ReighbozSoc: Center, 9791 Arrov Highway (to discuss let sizes an.: unit sixes). �. 3. Cednosday, December 10, 1986 - 7:00 p.m. - PLAgRIHG COLMOSIOR - Lions Park Co ity Csuter, 9161 Rasa Line goad. :r.° 4• Thursday, December 18, 1986 - TLDD p.m. - P'= DRTBLOPIQg3 COMKISSIOH -• Lions Park Cesmualty Center, # 9161 Dame Llno goad. .L City Council Agenda December 3, 1966 c_- •i` :'Vi�BAE no tall+oura t'•asamt Cale• iaatlM der t!a Can, ell • -eSets* aLl. &--a eaPectod to b. On, tia'a �Iti -•t d[a1caawid, 1, eet•d „p,m b7 1. oast of 08&z PaFaoll� ending 10/ 0/86 1I1191% sad 1 ad r 509.OI. for the total 2• alcoholic �icreraie 4ns1(oat(on for On -bale Sating P2006 zne Crill "d Oa(m, pay- I, Ghoa:, 10061 Beer d Wlme 10 Arrow Boat -, A Ibrahim X. 3• Wine, B, racage Applita ties far Ott -Sala Wine, Circle C Food Store Ip,,3,. Circle p 0 etozee, Inc, 7900 -D R. R"en. outmteaee 12 4• aid, Alcoholic . rsje Application for Oa_ 8 de Arhile , Glen, i Sale C P litsno, 9469 Foothill IIlfet.i or ensral, 14 ml-�av . and Robert 5• Alcoholic e Read. `.m1lRaatsurant 0=. 9aic !k Wine Rating Place, Seams Sane Lim Beer 6 87 16 ' obi. Zoe., 8760 6. 4?rorel of (m t aetueitp for parcel eanent afire ea and sabot Siy- ^avelo auaP 98% 86-091 lerpzoeement 18 impr%" �, a. iamt Limited bo(tted tp ��tl�emmt and improiemmt see ri release of by C! m Ortober 1, and pi est Ifa!ted, 19M. a,bmleta0 by and P(ttabnc b RO• 11 located be F Blxbp Streets. B •h -Haas and beyeea taraem Milliken Pont em and Sixth RRIO1.OTIOW ah +. 86_335 A RPSOLOTZOB OF TRR ClTT 28 �� FCQC.U]DRCR RYA m .0 APPROFZRO B= 8477R0 OIIRp�� Y� 98% SDR•80 -0-OO D SECURITY ACCS.,Fga OB0001ENT 1. 1986 A:D Arc -6 from the otter of 078,000 129-261 -64 cash Purchase the 7eroraa of 8 for ra °part ltCe t. at the Sstera Corperatto•, 1pt.ot rt' Street. aeti offal, 29 Aresus end 6th City Council Agecda _3_ December 3, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86-336 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COOgen OF THE CITY OF EASCEO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIEC A CASK PURCHASE OFFER FOR TEE SALE or REAL PROPERTr LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION of BUFFALO AVENUE AMC C79 STREET 8. Approval of map, improvement agreftent and improvement 35 seturity for Parcel map 9481 located at the northeast corner of Hcrrnth street mad Be located Avenues sabmi seat bT Golden West Equity Properties. RNBULUTION NO 8i- -337 42 A RP80LCTI0B Ol Till, TITr COUNCIL. OF Tax CITr OF RAaCHO AICAMOMGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PAM= MAP AMMIZ 9481, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 90. 9481, DMOFDMT AGREEMENT, AND INPROVEiE{T SECURITI 9 Approval of professional services agreement for 43 al gamest and feasibility study for the area VII storm drain vith C.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineer# in the Amount of 83,219.00 to be funded by Systems Development Fund. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -338 54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T33 CITT OF RANCHO COCANON3A. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A PRCFEBBIOBAL SERVICES AGSEECENT FOR AN ALIGNMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUCT FOR THE AREA VII STORM CHAIN WITH C.P.B. ODUBMTINC CIVIL ENGINEERS 10. Approval to advertise for bids for construction 01' 55 traffic signals at Bile Line toad and Amethyst Avenue end At Archibald Avenue ■nd Nintb Street and for installation of signal coordination equipment w Hue Line Bead. RESOLUTION no. 86 -339 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF TEE CITr OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ;3 "IRAFFIC SICRALB AT BABE LIRE ROAD/ALTA CUESTA DRITY, BASE LINE ROAD/AHITHYST AVENUE; ARCHIBALD AVEUS /HINTS STREET"- IN SAID CITY 1AD AUTHORIZING ADD DIRECTLga THE CITE CLEER To ADVERTISE 10 RECEIVE 3IDS . J• p^'.••. da i 0 I 4y,•.:. City COURVil, Agenda '. N``y :M1 -iWIe -4- December 3,'1986 yr; •. Approval to Parcbaae two mini pick -up tracks for the Park 141rteasaca ProQra, in - 60 ' lieu of two 'Cwbman° tyQe negative revio sly approved in the 1986 -g7 badger. + impact to budget, No j ' IZ@ Approval to rest °Vector° type equipment for the maintenance section catch basip'cltauing 61 Program. No negative impact to bedgat. ' 4 13. Approval of Improvement agreement sad improvement security for Development levier 86 -05 located 62 • on the southwest corner of Poothill Boalevard and Spruce Avenue, submitted by Martin J. Jaska, Incorporated. RESOLUTION E0. 86 -340 68 A RESSOLUTIOl Or THE CITE COUNCIL OF TIE CITE OF RAPCSO CDCAHMA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING INPIOVVMT AGREE?MT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POI DIRECTOR R271U l0. 86-tlS 14. Approval to swar.2 the residential street rehabilitation, Phase II (slurry goal) to the 69 appareae lowest responsible biddcr, Fontana Pavin3, Incorporated for the "mat of 0307,886.60. IS. APpr:nal of releaso of bonds and notice of completion: Parcel Nap 8800 71 Release: Pwlthful Perfurmance Bond (street) 0169,300.00 SUMMON l0. 66 -341 73 A RESOLUTION of Tag CITY COUNCIL OF Tli ClTr Or RANCBO CCCIIJODCA. CALIPOINIA. ACCEpr1No T8E PUBLIC IIZIOTZWTS FOR PAIZEL NAP 8800 LID AUTBORI21lG Tal MIND OP A NOTICE OF 0 O VLMon FOR 729 HOIE COP 81 -03 74 Release: Faithful Performance good (Street) 072,300.00 da i 0 I 7 City Council Agenda -5- December 3, 1986 RESOLUTION R0. 86 -342 76 A REEOLUTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACM?TlNG TEE PUBLIC IMPROTEMENTE FOR PAR(OA. NAP 9800 AND AD730RIZIW THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TEE WOES Tract 11626 Release: 77 Faithful Yerformaoce Bond (Road) 0663.000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -343 79 A RESOLUTION OF US CUP COUNCIL OY THE GITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNLt, ACCEPTING THE POBL7.0 LFROVOWIS FOR TRACT 11626 AND ADTHGAULSG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION TOE THE WORK 16. ,lyproval of profsreional cervices agreement for 8U Victoria hairs Study for the dtivanda Stom Drain Lines 1 -2. 2 -1, 2 -2, 2 -3 with Wiltianson i pebaid ConsoltlnS Civil Engiasers. RESOLDII(iE 20. 86 -344 03 A RES=UTION OF TEE CUT COUNCIL OF THE CIT! OF RAECDO CUCAMONGA, CA;IPUREIA, APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGRn=T FOR BASIN 9- DY TO BR PERFORMED FOR THE VICTORIA STOSM MAIM BASIN 677lOVIKO TES EFFECTS OF DISCHARGE FROM IRS YROPOSSO aTIVASOA CTOSN MAIN LINES 1 -2, 2 -1, 2 -2. 2 -3 WITS VULIAM06 AND SC6MID CONSULTING CIVIL ENCDPNERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 17. Approval of contract Change Order No. I for ibs ga development of a pavmmt ranagmtnt systm tar loal street$ and curb, gutter and sidewalk ioventery for the additional fee of 06,940.00. 18. App:aval of engineering services Contract Change Order 96 No. 3 (C.0. 85 -122), far Hesosa Avenue wideatug and ! Hamilton Strcet eateesiom with L. A. Wainscot- 6 ".z Associates, Ire. in the amount of 03.203.59, bringing the COLUaet amount to 036,952.59 to be paid from Systems Development hod. a r 7y� 4" City Council Agerdt ' "6 _ Ibeeabar 3, 1986 m REOOLUTICN N0. 06 -545 99 A RESOLUTION Cy ?jr CI1T COUNr,IL Cl THE CITT OF "SCRO OICLWWA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING O?K'lCM Rfi'M2T W V)O I. A. WAINSCOir A ASIOC'"V , INC. PON CVJMSA AVERVI WIDuMG AND RAMIL70N MEET EETTcSION )9• Approval of an lcientare Tr be Crean Southern Paeifle asportatfoa Cwpauy and CSa city for 100 conatroetlw of a trado crossing at Y.i /like, Avenue northerly of Ease Lice Road; and approval of •related sgreeseut between R. C. Land Covpany, William Lyon Company, and the City. RESOLUTION NO. 06 -346 110 A RESOIMo3 OF TNg CIrT COUNCIL OF THE CITr " RANCHO COCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPEOMO AN XEMT WITS EOOIIERF PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPA" y,2 CORSIIOCIION OF A GlAra CROSSINC AT MMIJ33 AVENGE SORII Or BASE LINE ROAD 20. Approval of Reaolutfon of intent of street D"fus Vrocedaees for conafdorotfom 111 in he request to onlfy I'Lrner /ltarmoss order a singular aise. ' RESOLUTION NO. 86 -347 ,T 112 ti } -, A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITT CO'�CIL OF IAE C I Tr OF RANCHO COCA"CI, CALIFORNIA, 08CLARINO ITS TV70T y . TO OEIPT Tag 37jLrn NAME= or 11E11g8A d9CII0ZZ A21) TURT,,R 4V=g UNDER TICS SI3GULAR NAME Of I!MMSA AVzgn :. 21. Approval to upgrade two v¢aat mainteance worker Positions to Senior Maintensuce worker 113 7� positions which wewld provide proper level of aupc"19ju, within m&lntema -ce pzcgra. 22. Approval to award WARn equlptant u(Ateaanca contract to Southern Oat' 1;4 .x Systeo, for the remainder of the Ito year, At • cost of $6,090.65. f 23. Approval to accept FY 1985 -06 City audit as submitted by Lance, Soli 1 Laggard. lib City Acdltoza. City Council Agenda own -7- 24- App,oval at December 3, 1.986 Me %ja elPeaditur. of .15 Install at$ erina Bud Build, v '000 far rase to rist, Of OS Bud 8 dellug .1 rase funds n2cex#,rr af,ty a an tr fro, the telephone space I'd r andf, equip.,at 117 can, V to the Sees"' fund t t. City ra', it ua&jla 25. proval I its ,, cm red $4,300 0 PurcbJxe Iding 413,300' mild Purchase so Sol V-.d ra 4 (70) an- and 0 tren P1 as t to d authorl'o a,.. . "locate th 130 exceed (01-464 oces )Wat ia ust Of tere, to exceed 118 7 3900). ecou" to trust on gar a fund ratio, Bud Park Appr,,.1 of a Account with the C"Justivent. sol-al 'unty of S to the act Ontrol an 31MIrdional control Contract a direct officer deal... t d 0 allowing for 120 Council h. cost to City . a f. allocated r . he h marries I. at 0 $25,300.00c 0 CQc^sO an he Fr 29aS-S,7d,, -for this 1. The 1184 27- Approval Of . udget. crrI-Id leve City grant resolution I Of Act 4ppli authorial. a ba Food. cation for at 986 C 8 the onh'it ad cOur The a I application .11, Z, afity Parklmuds Bond Park alls, t facility to or th, tal of 124 Northt.. ps - Rod far the pjeacb Of the addlej .k. rti,l f,,dl,,C!ty-, a 04 of of the xistivs A aft(Munox 56-348 future or 11sozonox OF rJ8XAtC110 CUCA TRX CZrr COURC., APftrCATZ;AhQ11A. X CALIFORRA op 2111 CZTr 125 ACD0Zft7r,jF0r,,rr FAR Fog Cgjv�, n I A?ftopZn or JIS Aj;T or Szo D,)IDffjt G IWS MSMG=Dt Cov�r 1986 US Fog rffg Cot FA" Slra YAczLj7zjS Toy0i lum 28. Set public STRUCrxox OF Nuzzur rat UCI OF ORTSTWS Crrr ARL, Asseaft, hfari,j, PARX request a god - j D"elcp, anq&rY 7. j.987 corral) I Develo ct acres of I to too (?load ctO amend th act Natal Amendment 86 Intel Foothill and ;1"t District Me -07 APJF located (General C. A 207-1g*ulavard Omer I P fro, -)FC. 01-43. Bad Sacon the 4orlb., a a]) f 29. Set Public Diego A, at to Zr 1.06 An anus Portion Of gesslelt hearing _ De of COOOL,u Bud r ceRbIr 17 req cajun enter,, - 1986 t afriat � Appeal of 100 rrsct - zoviloaftental 6, a " face Inc. loaning C 10349 Vest aide 1 eqcftftri "lssfOm- - voice, 02. 03; 1062-0110-f02:0ts 14 and act trail a decision 03; Z062ftla is. Apt easement 1--il. 1 1043-121-01"13 Ciry Council Agenda -8- Dec®ber 3, 1986 30. get public bearing - December 17, 1985 - Review and accept the Hone Lag Policy Report for the City of Rancho CaMongs. 31. Het public hearing - December 17, 1986 - levie' and accept the Housing Policy Report far the 1 mcho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The following ordinances Base had pOlic hearings at the tine of first reeding. Second readings are expected to be routine and w comtroversinl. They will be acted wpm by the Council at one ties withmL 'Ascossion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item cam be removed for discussion. NO ITEMS SUBMITIED 1. APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -26 - WTON D"MPM 126 COMA" - The appeal of Conditions of Approval requiring (1) the undergroundieg of existing overhead utilities along Arran Route, and (2) a drainage study and possible storm drain construction within Jersey Boulevard for a 51.4 acre taster Pfau located on the south side of Arras Route east of Utica Avenue in the General Industrial District. (Continued from November 19, 1986 meeting) 2. ORDER TO VACATl 22ND 97REIT SETUECII TUIM AVXNVZ A.TD 145 DEER CREEK CHARM].. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -349 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITP COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COUNTT OF SAN BERNARDINO, STAIR OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A POMON OF 22ND STREET BETWEEN TURNER AVENUE AND DEER CREEK CRAMNEL 3. CONDUCT TAI EQUITY AND FIDCAL RgSFONIISILITT .ACT 150 (INFRA) NEARING AND A7110T1 TID 7BSUANCN R THE UNCRO CUs• AMOICA- PALMDALR- POATIRVILLR- COLTON IOUSING FINANCE AUTIORITT OF NOT TO IICISD 838.000.000 PRINCIPAL AM" Or SINGLE FAMILY NORTCACE REVENUE BONDS. i City Council Agenda -9- December 3, 1996 ! RESOLUTION 50. 66 -330 152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL. OF THE CIT" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ISSUANCE BY THE RANCHO CU CAHONGL -PAMDASH- POSIRRVIISPrCOLTUH HW_JC FINANCE AGENCY OP NOT TO EICERD $38,000,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT Or SINGLE FAMILT MORTGAGE REVENUE BORDS F. MEW ADVERTISED ANARIICS NO ITEMS SUBMITTED C. CITY NANICWB ITAFF MMTS 1. SELIC7109 OF THE COOOEIN CROVP7067I11 ILAISMI TEHLUI 155 NTS CROUP AS TDE CONSULTA TO PRTPARE A MABRR STUDY OF MIeIMUf LOT AND UNIT SIEE8 - The consultant Lee not to exceed $14,900 will bo paid by the Building Industry ' Association. 2. IRTOWATION REPORT OF INFESTATION OP EUCALYPTUS 711"" 164 ET TEE LORGHORN BEETLE. 3. REPORT REGARDINO STATUS OF PROPOSID COUNTY JAIL - AN 171 ORAL REPORT WILL BI PRESIXTED IT LAURIN CARSWW-. N. COHIISSION mum NO ITEMS SURMITTED F N-A cd� I. COMWM MIMS 1. CITY COIINCIL COMMITTIE APPOINYMENIR. 172 , 2. DISCUSSION OF VACANT PLARNIIG COKH16SION POSITION. 186 3. DISCUSSIOR OF ADTISORT COMMISSION APPOIND(EITS. 186 4. DISWSNION OF PARE DEVd1.OnM C010(ISSION APPOINTMETS. 186 ., F N-A cd� i city Con �.. ecil Agenda -30- Deeeuber 3, 1986 .j v J. CNUMCAT M T201( D[i k3Y.IC rf, ,°Q i. AEIGl7�* tr" M I, Beverly A. Aet►elet, City Clark of the CIV of xnche COCON)P, bereby certify that a true. accurate ropy of the ' YYt- forepias ftmim � pwt 4 n"rety -two (72) hogs prier to i the s tial par A.A.,2674 at 020-c lase Liao load. _ a. > x^ 4 V N T I 11� rC1'T> iI Sv. Q ^• V x Sw A' y 9M r ` I 4 , Y S > •� a' Ij y I- I m'- }TiN 'r-• �! 9w •x Yt 1 9 y • ° 1 •nT T J^ n> nr°ann r �� yn j 9G •3 TT Tr) y III a I r I > I r K ^ I I x T ? r y I ^or ,I� I f�l�l�lII Ili � . i� sr ao ii ggn "2 M it r.n c °n r- .�ar^ -r iz 1 r rn n IPfA •�y ^•� } Yn J. i0 Y >G1V yr' YS�M >r •!O _T nN n,^ y� IV r M N }ham^ 1 I r r •.O A T ]r i (i I I ,V WN�r j v.. Mp- ru • r`1nN r`�J'P fV r r.. P I c. no" w<• ao�o.^.rn of'i• `.v•'O�o. i v I ��I NY r� YC g". I W.° ON ^ .,n • 0 NW ♦N �Y ��y p MD 41r °'Y om tl u N 2,A. 'C 9� o•�on��g;ra "r= nR ;D 1 I �• :r ;Day _� .zz Nin z nr r! i NF ,< i� �� 1 I •C• Sw AD m ,• nti '•`n ^r_ :i' n� CH ^S A I! Y Yn„ r n•s�=A j A� ,nA .. y T 1 D r [47,"n i i'��, in mT 1 c•<.,,'a'w T9a wM TwYi Tn I I m I '.! I O r•DI. Snri Cn rx � I= Y� ✓L ^ rx, i�� mN Tm I •• � J "` TC N' 1 r I •MI M nl 1. q T n^ q i =• =�a"� r c - � i M m^ 1 I I I Ro ca eR'o ^�N ^�'• 1= n W nR 1 I ^y+ 'f• O` NO R !, '1 N.A" J� •N I wU OC �WS';,'F•6• n!. �• 1 I I I <O WDN•nn mnn Jn PO•nr C •• �� I I i rR Nh•7n• I I• II I I t I Y C'.lij i 1 i a ' P i Ys s n O r. 3 7 1 O F r `cu 'C, t '✓� 5 T n 1 , nm n Nn� '•w z',,', � em is of .Y++:� i W y�f' {• n ro [ ' F �' �r I as aMJIi Y' 11 1 1111 4•i 1. I I j ^w 1W• NC\ �P• L UO• OJi ^J' 1'I 1 1 } J 1 i a ' P i Ys s n O r. 3 7 1 O F r `cu 'C, t y�r I•..•.., TP _ Jr :M•I - T ew QQrw n• a 1 Toi oYiiSrui.°. SY• NI �>' Q te 3e� Yyi�.-p r >I e!••..�'�'> �j�j rNos�i IJ•oi Ei4mT QrQz�ami '•"y1»i�•, .).1 � I QrQ 1 Imi? ^✓n^I%�s ^ "r .g>r•.yA.•FAIyTy.••n . l <> n g Pit- FE •587•/�1 � m7�"�+ i°ISi .ri o'C Smd iRl n 1 = a ibryry.yy� <'+'"4 en)C • �1•n.z. J , « iz•z.Y nyP>•QNi .z• > °° I ' I I drrY s OF M ly ! •• I I I .mi•NN I I N i � I I NM.�m ili.w�nT i1 YIOA 9wtDST mmy0 m•Oi.mmpMA Y 61T 1 44 TD T{�r�y>� n To <r TyTntR��A < I I I �^Oi�"�N O�wO F �Ir•^I�pm�E' lq°A �AN �y N77�j Q � 'n I N'•i NS.).)• QAa N fR �yT'� °�.'�Irynrj�. •°. �i j Ino anrgv.. etr'N•n e ° im SNTl !'I^SaCr'� i pp D) i N1 irPJJ14 IlJ yy 1.O n Iw„ Vr rlf�Ow Mt iaA r OT pft �SNY >NT � T fin I I I �TgT� •�I S }N}��Ni.Lg ~i Ym J NY•Y T9 gryrrY. w T fA D� Y <TrT NO RmN n M1S� I LO..Npiryp�� � r� 1 I wT O nnt•g�� A••13i'w b �� Gr Im -.M rS i yym NrY w T� WT-n- ag I �1n I nno nA.� nw I n -.-o, nn O I Y I dTy 0O y� °rlf� i>FyOI p! 1 �{ wTir ~ R I I RD AA 92 I pT i d I W+'liT � I 0' I I �? i'• « I r I •in i °Nr N: I t I I I y 1`1 n {✓ � I I I `rN•gsa'�n u:GuN Boa' �' '�aa'w..•...y+r.��.�......Jr�.. •Y..w.'.�.r..`....r..". � � fS VNN NN N Nr NNNNN '� yyNN�( NNIy M•.y rwOl 8 � I> O�^a00x.pd1 ad6w0 IC O O1 r P11 •. W 1y 1 ; .�)j 1 I I I Oy-IP J4 wY POI P•Ji• PVTOYJ'q yN �Pn WyOp a .i ll jL "' 44 aJO JM�YP±.V ww0'J .1•. w q N ly P�NOIj• r 00� 00 • a p p 7• r I r.,n° oq 00 OO•yOgpwOPOpOOWO �pOgN0.0 f OI I I I I .al �yy I �i�!. na'�: !T- _'_T^T T. Ae LT�f4T..,.,Tf ;–._u - -_.- _ —� __ _• rC I a iw ��NUaTrT i 1 2p � M M � r ti.x i io eTrz ' I n 1 1 1 n e x ti or T 1O r iiwolr n I L N nn n n n yn o o y as a A A M.. r qIy Fl x I S S 2�Srm1ti.,, e °op.rc in� I I I I� I iw ��NUaTrT +Y w 1 2p � M M ffs si f y ti.x i io eTrz F o. n RE-1 ' b y .x.. n � •n u iAY O 5If yM 1 lraar�= it .T.�s °3e 1 NJ WN i mATO +tea ^.+Yym !3 a iA a n .n.TNa�9OAr Y N > anwi>o3 I mT�f$ yl I �.r. J•I r � yn1�P pN N ..OJ JPNl1. .N.u�1gy a.N. oo�mo ' I I -;� - „ --,-,- - n e x ti or T 1O r iiwolr n I L N nn n n n yn o o y as a A A M.. r qIy Fl x I S S 2�Srm1ti.,, e °op.rc in� I I I I� I s 0 + n. 4 7 iw ��NUaTrT +Y w 1 2p � 10 NlT�C� M ffs si f y ti.x i io eTrz F o. n RE-1 ' b y .x.. n � •n u iAY O 5If yM 1 lraar�= it .T.�s °3e 1 NJ WN i mATO +tea ^.+Yym !3 a s 0 + n. 4 7 n A i f y y • n � i ,y I 1 1 NNNNNNNN 4N�lP .A 1 NJ WN �� y by !3 a iA a n � June Y N > anwi>o3 I i•j I s 0 + n. 4 7 t�i I I v N� w» as aJ as J .r. g - I � >° 0.� RT �: x�r�♦ TY�`xx rr s �.. NP J rwI 1• ; 'aM .ZKt'10 •( MN nn��i ;a;-- !) s x ycleff li C• � ° b° FF ^A Nn nizm z � >•ascol�Qz wCa I y "" Yn r9 8> ,-F.H > -bso. }I .I I � ^Y "y >� •rrte >� L'Fs�i'•fi wrens PrSsln »i 9r } , Q a .mi <9 ny rlrmw..iifi:w Wl,y TnC�yl•°n g i' na � nl • N ° � I I I �rn'vi n.}.• e� iRi �°„%{ .°, °r4�T88° 1✓<'+•�na � °L`81T °$.^- } `� � I I rqq{{�en b'� °� °yxo$$�+P•isi.�it>MOm <i ein Y,z»�o o>�m } I I ° I �� ��•I"1w»S m >nN fw>� ^n'� °mrh >»r TNj °� T9 r O 1��1�p111 =GG N I iy %m ZRXE °$i i ^IY+,T» n» 9r# 9 swr m 1 N yJj qg p 12 s n J K .°.n m N T F �IPw•� •lI < n I yy ° nn Yln n j i A J2.bl IA I MI I A x9 N�i� y IT I I T ,M r A 1 > ..» »» .. rr yy» Y r »r.� » »y� »rx�...�r »� » »� I' C W r^ bM OO�OO�aN N» �ypN »NNNNNNNUNN N�IaO wP VN Oab.P.IPb06bbb N�UyN ID ,1 !' I I I I N Irr I1rW�Wa� N�N »a •f' �y I � P P y9> � JU P ppW bWa Nr }. O �•I wl Y I I O O%f 1�! YD f)JPN O • O PP• MJJ yP�la PJr NP Nnr D n OW O•Jlrn• O p 12 I O�JOLOO�OMp001�P0 GOOOY•pa$40�lD Orb•POI.ni.� �� W I OiM1 11 I I I PNPWO »VMnP ♦ I I ' I I I 1'c I I I a a .. TI JII N uu Y i w•O ua ou � w$ A qA 'ao „T�NN UV7wN d,� WC "y P'p iP I I mAT. »� Cy ° TyyTT.IwN gf }� r y YOY AW VY �� � I IY� 21y} CyT pTTTT ��CiI •MijO TT(y � ^Ii lAn �r rYP 1- � _ffYCC P TSa nNYMgLA y1'If nO nbOy. •I. M(i� C � T ! - >T Y11I1�S lIrSTT „.1.TO N/�A! >t• EYE O� �9.i1 f w yTNS^p T1 ^TniIlA lin b/q}y PAYnOjTY2S Y C^�i SAO br I T �• DTTyyOOOAOYI Ar`Ly� T�1 TrS� SAI n!i TVAnb22 AT[l 4 y1Cy JJJ I� T 1.1ii! N. 0A C� MITT P OA M A ARE '�^ IQy I P T T , 1 cd a°3r I s , I �� • I NT$ »OZ I � T �r � 11n� f ' M ' ' I lKIN'I�TO=�f'Dlr°�I♦�C'TI�(*I.OTTaq �NSMP� nN41IT1.�(� �jI p I 11 I y T2 �aO^^T nw bu V YT ptlpnwjA {�9�V }1 s GggA �p V T ^£yMr kTTT A bAU (r ' F� Cu ^ f n ^� iollT�ol'n "i •' or AT s �yAS.r. �; �TI.I. iii II Til p �i S wl y4L inA ° LF � O SA j•y{$i n0 IT yY C.IA y(� ^ y S NY MN$Qj YNY ^ I 1 TCN]1 iA yT"JATT t FI' j os dOoti i ^ ^N F NNy j I 1n •I r AA �nY NMNN �tS A�A I •� Wj�W W�yy•�rry�� M _r1. N N I I n ' + N NO PU VNwP. pM.a •W V,y�W Y�VV rr rrlYy ly 11' n I i , i U�Ur� , I VPU.nW �Ip OVI Mi ''NM WWWVW� I\ I I 1 I N #py ¢OUri�� YIU AU PP'y�ar �rrj rr I ° a � Oi paIWM1 YV' . '. � SQi ny a� •I OnVCO�• � , � Y Y a 'a♦y 4 o O• P O T• saM i ;yxg{gj �.pp..0 W •• o °�IeN$ OrM I � Y y o° � •> > o• 1j � , , I I 1 I I �U ! I l I 1'r nr mD TND p1p Ln'!w0_w TAO 'T r or m%Tfi i�-' n 1£N a vn �yl E9 qm: MI n nn n~ i O� n n Oonn nN I 3 T Tn x. p0 S4y CI" I r Ii Y _a DAlaxl i N I�f 5 NN ( Wye (�y Cn I N���S PM.I.WN1 OaVMVW �p i I N� x1da� 1 P VV�� NI IA 00� O � aCOOO,�Ai,♦��'C�AN�u ly P I oay4' 1 1 I I , � ; I I i J1 a I T P wni I: ,N L, 1 i I I 1 I I , I I I II I i ! I � I I ' I I I I ' I I ! I l I 1'r nr mD TND p1p Ln'!w0_w TAO 'T r or m%Tfi i�-' n 1£N a vn �yl E9 qm: MI n nn n~ i O� n n Oonn nN I 3 T Tn x. p0 S4y CI" I r Ii Y _a DAlaxl i N I�f 5 NN ( Wye (�y Cn I N���S PM.I.WN1 OaVMVW �p i I N� x1da� 1 P VV�� NI IA 00� O � aCOOO,�Ai,♦��'C�AN�u ly P I oay4' 1 1 I I , � ; I I i J1 a I T P wni I: ,N L, k, bin v COPY to dot r. rrrryu a ��•"r�la'r't�b w.+..r..,,, �'3at• b.! i t Nn w.•a kAUlN OF Alnr..�.. AP ttxqNIM ° CRY OF pM'CNO r`ur.r . 00e 7115 I10"a Al . SS In - ! r.e.. R.w•f.w.r'b•1• rx RAT! p A NO ip ...+°wry.. Crrt.,r _ ..r,• OA.Alya�4 r a- Ae- 4""Oftw or i ".. � ati„r^ "�' ° w_w ��r.,,war� ,°aw r r. ,a r • �.."11C:#Ci(�� I!rCll Itl1!_J (/ � .•'•r'•� a �i•�r1 •.+..w�1 �'� r�� � r.~ti • Ala ^'•'rw �� ti� �` Mme: � r +�.�..tiV.•M'•L,� °fir` r�.�rr, a°w. I rwr. r 4 arr• •.raw w tea° ti•Y ♦ •.•. i •ate ' M...fn rta.r.tn �+:. r a. °ter +. w � �.r4 y� •`.a``,,,r � ` Ahyfy 0.�.•.�;larty�•'r Vr 01`r��. C -�. R" AUAM �'' =+±�. _� �__�_�_` `�.� •fib «'- -�A`qr Ma- _,_.- ..- ,��.�. ,A 11422-7-17 C ftAi E V4c` _f 0 UR £,P l Air Ir &Ulkc.OPMT+cc207. 'Rry �StOst,Tl,t L �ratnt . Aar : 801" i�C3/OtR,trt< WEST : Madruwc H t PQrourr,rc ' TT Al� `Y 1 ap^ i' JI �C AI 6?1011 10[ N[OM011[ W111 [ ISCIRd" r. D }�.. t1 AW" M+M C.� 1101 b.A•.I nr9N lDO �KC 93019 9en r0 hOff 1. WnOl W IKJ117I11) au NO- An T1 w7T Wr An[ 1"m Qi ADW1h1 TH 1A NOV IS198T.rro,..-- GCr 11/1I17 A�r1.J.1 ![.s.f 0.1.7 ttQ N6 f4 reM/rWl.dl yr4.b w.� 2. NAWAQ a g of D.w Cirelf [ CeaeOltn® [tans• [e0. 1 {IrrPl d f SACWWM m TYR nast.l r. t 17!!,00 30 t 14. Iwd /mn Owl tl 4 In reb . a I1stn ♦[..tste•ir W M 7910 -D N. ilwn. At [An1a �mrr. 91710 ¢.n CeMr IOflit ' 10 frAt1 W CAIn SSA C¢.wrft w �w M •ww � Mw� .•� rrww �• vw wAw V ••• �4 \• w +• +Mwry w w �•r\ .• •/.w �• .w ••rw w••r•• �. w A• �• w•w\ M u.•ww. w rw r• w••rw w w w n •• •w .w. r y ••1 Y ✓� YI •ww w• �w Y� � Y M � � •. Y •w IR w w ••••• ••� � w• ww Y Yi•• Y+\ Y i.• Mw+• Y •••r•• 1••�w w Y ��• ww M1 ••ww.0 \• M w. Mew \\ mow. M � I_• •wY •••Yw Y rw�l swY \ � •W w N• Y wry •1 • ••n w w W w •Iw• w•w• •.•r �• r �w •. We • IVn• IY•• w•Yw•i M w�•. 4! r V •�• ~wrY w• 1•w• Y •.A•w 4 Nw \• waw•w w w Yww r • +••�• W\ w Yw \ IA 0011AMII �Ni �. �•,� APPUCATWN BY T[ANMOlt it STATE W CN110bM �� �w / •w•. r ••� •�••• •�• •I•w..•w.Y w1 wn i4 \ \ w Y�� � a •mow •ww I \• �•� �\ �. Y Y YT+I •mow f•r M w.ww. w ww• Y •.d, wi••w Y w W 0 Y •• ••+.• •J\ ••••w•w \ w+W •Y i i.• .F \ •�•• N A• war V w• w• r.L •M.ww w ��. ~�aryy � �Ar ti •nw+ I � � ww W Nwrn•••. •M � r •w•• 4 Yom• w Y• w •••A Y ••W •••••••wY YwW w tw�w� Y w •w w W w w b Y• wr I •wlw w w Ywr w YYn Y4.•.Y I •w/•w. y r �Ynw ••• Y .rr ♦ •• �� w w Y.r r\ .w �• w• w w r•••• Oo NN IY.W t4M7W ldl iw OrplwY Vw O+y A1.✓A paLA ri. p iJ•d.r1YA 1 {/1 {/16 p _cmrtt venal _ pr...A7w♦ -__w ±_ _ ttA4 rr �lw.p N. _�" I . 1 ``,,any r 4P t 1L i/ G K' Q IRES r [70'k CN /A Lp=AX 2 xak 17 IN ' "rY C�RG�6 K Covysrv,eucd STaus..�:; Cfotut K Foo sim *m37 M. 79X _0 _JYAVENAvf- Pgoe r rY CyytiW&'r4 -Y 7-OY"E COMML''QC(AL . .f onme, OF i b:rACWT FAOGE REM NKan: Piom) CAQYAOL liar. t/ r Ce,r�rcrtun� Sw�ry :�VittsTAIAL PF1c. EA5T: %wwrte,AL (tJESr. Cotw4raC /CL. r�0 a J5' Kr i. K y r3 } k le vo COPY__ - - -- P�:w: —seta, , rw Mwry W AIaAIq OIwrT aIIM y INI �Wti> /Cl,t ta..w.f/.OIt10 �BtmttClnp t1seA10 Geinral �^^ Nov 4rwi�wM�Iy RNLTC 0lpll,� 7A9jW 2 HAMM a AIt Pco 1 FA SIDS Po Mill rlwl. Yr ww C 1 rma) a ItAwu ," MrAt Ot -133U Its M .. I tw.) r. MrrWI. WI _ _ Ox IYat TL nJi.Ow /w Aw1� e.x�wrr �' 11. 1pA.I.- Tll•rwwwOlw Ow lOrrrw• -..uJ MMN«WIwI /r,.N�yQwY — Il Artuw .wwt Nl M,Yq, wM.O wrIIY A[IM Pr Miw MIY J h YYYNMIY.I Y a YwrA wd N1 M 4.t1 r MJI. r aull w WI.Y w H IW.J r. J W Mb _ J Y All AIr.Yr Cx+W A.t Il STAN a Guv0lM c.wrv.�_+�lJ!mw.Clna._ _.w•_! {:fie .r w..r . r r. ,..,...... ..... -... r / //� ^ ...... Jti•.w r.V�. Vil,w.. V 1r. �r HY . Il AIIIICAM !// � I Ige1 MUl.e� •ter _ �.I.T- I '___z.�i, �.' c�a_ APPMAI0N t7 TRMII[RW I1 STAN O CA A CG.WV W�8Aa /tlm...IIMI 0.r-- lIHlt4 �r+.wrwn r.....r ..... �.�. -. N... inr hr .w..r�... s,.•r.r�w... GoI NW NIA,&kW rM f4,r rw DFv Vr0.tl AxYJY{ �j tw.,MO.wyA. Q��AYIwr TA 11 - / -B{ I� � CQ14] Al4m _ - r,Ow.Y6Iw W�J�,r�p�...Gi 04Ar�1 --- Ma4111A y1��..li rwlxr r xww Il� L; { o1JC l 2 T � N u Quu V J �y _ J Ali Q 4 w t� n l Y Y � Ii yR _ Y An.. u S y n b O� n b O T b _ � Ol W A2 'N 0 C, �V J4 3 ( , J q yy or 4 n Ol N O a \i x• bl...,V,. h-. w two uw L.. >4. 11 Aqq w �M ti., V• L� 4••,�a, r�ti 1 11 AtAt! CV Cmmcw " .ter { Ulm CA In".7 y NOV 13 A v' :uluAn'�il C.•.,, M 'WPUCA OM odw ph i ,E f� M J \ \ & © \ . . f � ` _ _ _ _ <� / ,IN (k /y- k � \ }[ \ � f 6 i� 2� 1rF F — ,PPPOFRANC110,CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 0 TO: City Council and City Manager a FROM: Rathindra (Shintu) Bose, Senior civil Engineer 1577 9 BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improveent Security for Parcel Map 9896 (DR 86-09) m submitted by Bixby Development Limited, no. 1, and release of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security accented by City Council on October 1, ' between -submitted Milliken and BPittsburghoAvenuesiandebetween Fourths d Sixth Streets. RECfHUDATION It soaidndagreement andcstecurtincta dadre adopt attached resolution Mayoriand City C erkytoi�lgnosaid agreement. nt er 1, 1986, and authorizing the BUKGROL410 theThe Developer, Bixby Develo,-=nt. Limited, No 1 1s submitting an agreement following to qua ae construction of the off -site improvements in Street Improvement Landscape Faithful Performance Bond: S 155,000 Labor and Material Bond: f 71,500 S 140,000 The developer is requesting release of the bonds accepted on . October 1, 1986, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance S 295,000 Labor and Material $ 147,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, RSB:LB :cg Attachments ,s� ■: '. J 1 I — m c F . 3 CI:i'Y 0 F ECHO CUCAMONGA ENGII G DnWON c� ,T N CITY DF RWHp CDCAMDIM LVROVEMEMT A6AE FOR PARCEL MJW D896 (DR 86-03) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Hap Act of the hereiState of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of entered nafter California, ed as the City, c °ryorstion a California Limited Partnership hereinafter Development d between med, No.dltity, Bixby Y referred went as the Developer. WIThESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as Parcel Map 9895 (DR 85 -09); and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located between Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues and between Fourth and Sixth'Streetsid NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: I. the Developer hen by agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 8 hereof within twelve effective date hereof. months from the Z• This agreement shall be effective on the date of the Council of said City approving this agreement, This agreement default on the day fol�owing the first anniversary date eme said all be of unless an extension of time has been granted b 9 of S shall be 1n Provided. y said City as hereinafter 3. The hereof. extension of City 1!' yitiny not less than Ci days before the expiration date hereof , and shall ' —i tnnl stntess of Of ti9tuastaneviewethesprovistons the ofxthiylagreement. .lncle City shall construction rf ht to r standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof, 4. em the Developer falls h neglects to comply with tha provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met b Developer and /or his surety helfullicortaa expensee ncurred cover from the 5. The Oe deveiopmont in a accordance with thee Cucaioonga County Water Dfstrtct. 911 Studebaker Road Long Beach, CA 9oB15 metered water service to each lot of said•_ regulations, schedules, and fees of the wal :i 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, rolocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with constrm.ction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Stendard Specifications of the City, and to the Inprovement Plan Approved by and on file In the office of the City engineer. Sold improvements are tabulated an the Construction and Bond EsticWte, hereby incorporated on page 6 hereof, ac taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construction of any transitions or other incidentdl work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drtinage. Errors or onmissions discovered during constructin shall bo corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. D. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to Start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to coyly with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development. i0. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have Elie right to complete any and all work In the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and/or his contractor by any lawful means. 11. Said noveloper shall at all times following dedication of the streets and easements In said sutidlvis.an, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerou; conditions. Until the completion of all improvements, herein incorportted an Page 7 , to be perf�rmad, each of said streets not accepted as Improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained 4n a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. - 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Coanuniry Development Director. 2 / .x The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever 1s later. 13. The Developer is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Drdiances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed thereunder until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided herelnwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the city. 14. This t terminate until maintenance trnsecurity hereinaferr described has been released by t eity. ounilanew agreement together with the required taprovewnt ^ecurity has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for Securing deposits of public monies. 8. To secure laborers and materialmen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified oy Government Code Section 66499.2. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit, with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the en?'- ^er or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for it etting of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerliue monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment In full; or, If no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as procedure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance Of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. 3 oPc-4- o• The required 6 of tehd bonds and t lff. 1s agreement. Principal a�9reement The Developer "Ounts thereof a 1 Portlonhall be f Warr are set fo1 'Owl n9 the data he I e "FOM defectsh j� the 1n4yrov forth on �epe1red ch ement^ caterl ements descr Percent shall furnt b 1t�avoiolePrOvemen0 be defecYiv ��rkmanshfp 1n this re� of falthTUlrrgr a faithful Pnstrructl nn 0 guarantee enteea . ch charges bt he City sM � �r sPeclfledPerforrynee y Mfntenancee of AsyelopeTfz0•Do,y i a sum equal Cie to The hnce the ia7rov with r spnct�veloperuarantee secur {bligotte $raver is gr. ten auths been accepted aments have brtQac a Park wpny aalntena° shall ealspdescrlbedei• orlWed 6 th May,b ereleascdthepOthernI a Ck?Vel °the and P�OPerthat the Develvislon Hap Act and Provided ni:emenr . 9uararr_ icr subcontractor d °Per Pr °pe cttonsd a�ar as �whi hi 9 Workseln shall dlPOerson ,° ev n subc ntrae�t, nt. whether o Persons Or The aqy ontrctorhrd o9es 6oesd ama subcont ,a, and dddfto cont�loyees�alaInsu Insured and tdlre �Troper ct as the The minims aaMOUntadoflsuch insurance Policies De o e A. Pontrar.._. B. each acetdeq °t a°t less th ti nsgate cf n Provlcradlfe e. of rhea insurance t less thangreemont °S2ScCurr S$oD.DOD Devalo forach than $500 Per or 6...0 4 .�3 and maintain su �Uln; tht artm and anpuDtfc the 9reemenr 4-cont. "e 91 f —W,o e anyone theh S1ty, °I See �a11 TlstSo red wntractorsers. agent, th allows: shall shall a,nd hi, , liabilft � e ,� i of M'`hs he opera in the work ty in file ld. That before the Specified the City a certift atef0n of thl fed insurance, or certificates precicdfn9 the canallatfonsh feats 9!s of I' the Developer by h such certificate, such reduction f of I' he a n9 hthe sha1J have received therexpfration shall of an , covering eaent carrier, before in cover, endors AS evfd unders notirycatioo by re9f tered�eia�j2)frays Polic beerevi aces ence of Insurance of impr +eminthscsaaK' t ' dSWdtlhvider visions airity, and has contained to, affixed has sU�altted therein, and of intent his signature heretofollowing described Ar None and address Of surer . fcfAYCE T'Pe, Y. nc1P41 A.4ount. st3, Nfte and address of Sure t. � t.W pA - �0 landsc'•W' ty: rInc1P41 J7 Type: nnt; d.-ess of surety. itsl - ^<ll7A�� '� $ �)• S� $70,000 Na,;e and ad P!Pe: cipai 44' °nr: Name and eddy *41#271 f t�v,� N/A ess of surety, prfn ^lk N/A IN ho � c1Pa1 Azount: duly NI>h'f � N/A dates set ford 3 � M?rOR i •tD API(K N/ 'Date Oct °bey R7 9g� teo=)ed tv wily h)l� F A� C A :� 1 Y o el f ° sse those ufred Present Oate October zf• l9gr� Rona)d A O adshaw ve O \ 1 aM ont the n Per c Ac Fh e s rePteo; 9na Pe e Qt yn Off r y C/t 9 BY. of Rancho Cuc�n9e r me �veloper ice Attest. a mnfcfpal corPor Treasurer ation proved: N4YOr Cfty clerk �Cft Attorney �ti Eg7t� Ml,� 4 Y ..�.�. �•:� µ'ii' for Ot 1 C /Iy te- op ftj tta ffle Re 9�c�CeS � 5 Itk l,Z.� t "'�)°fJDIITIYISI� , c rop Mr�� tk h t° 6 FEE !n t0 P 4t �LE �� City pray ye f sbur ht' 6t TF: fnq e V. Ao. � s �.r�ITY 10fIT �ttf t f� ��°^f� f� N ¢99s�t Yntltenn to Pttt °6u� sp� S.F. P.0 C sits r or � S.F. 4" p curb t4 `gam S. F, Drfv C.C. s ' 8" C. P • p CProa�h pa)t f' 24" ?Ott. pgICE t•�N Cr shed t I °n of s Iy ter' and a r 900 µ0p E.f. SteetSWto bafObtPerde(Inc curb) 2,55 �\ NT SemoveI or9hts tons) t° tht 3.40 reef sf r P.C.C, �e)s q c1'i 0.15 - • 'v0� Eq. outlet as curb and 8 0.)0 S. F, Sawcut `rr °Cture. L 9OtternJ,Y j 45.00 p�5T0.7A ros INSPECTIO Lands b0er��d led ferfgattan 501 �� � ENTAT aM S t q aY ESN 3� �p0 F��rs °ant to � J To;r AL t u� ino Prror` mo, �RT eho Cec � L A6f ebt p F °STS �)SZJ rse° 84 rrsua„�Iof QS nfcJPt) NAT°' C NO (s�1�J t t6 000 31 . �9t E141A1 dOMD Zt, after Engfntering5' a ea Trt1e 0X) la. 0 00 oarseri,Ctrda p�� SQ10nea 1.08 dC sA ° °° on Po•!tr San t•VS V may' RCf 6863 =n= io- • + 'r. N For J Date; Ff le i *Pursuant t be aid, t o Cou t� Rancho Rev Rrior nt issuancettles,� lsed 3184 of an St•v R. �b �� ibN MAY. RC➢ 3686.5 p C,I,1�1' JW WIZA 11 o Divls tF QO,atroo 4th t�tzr xE ON 4 Mf 1114.. 6th. e.,_?ftAE 1A)TE " M'ItIng not inel ng PeAtt'or P va �eentfe for Drl�eCaCurslde e1C-F' z4- g- 8. F.0 CDroach PrlDaratldnross gutter rCsh S agg, paSub grade l fnc, curb) 00 toe !reef Iights R tons) 'meva s ignt , C.C. ccurb s and 8 on ly felt '1!t struCture gutter only td /5pj Trees C. hca ;e and Irrigation Rting San 4eRosit shalt ke to plttebur' ,, RESOLUTION H0. RAItCFlO RESOLUTION OF _ ARE T AN 'CALIF I INP CITY COUNCIL OF TY �F AGgF��� 8D IN ROVEMENTNTA APPROVING THE CI n. FOR P PROVEMEN, TH P1tt;1 Rr ' Parc AP D SECURIIT ACCE?TEp ON OCTHBTH MPROVENENT City council venues and etween (OR 8 '09 • 1986. on Oct and 1 and Sixth between Milliken d.-1 NN .1986; Str eels ed t offerredE�e the Subdivider, Bixby Oevelo was aPPr9v security ±dePted ty . onCle4ec tOon by th �' st rS•,1urf ;Y Nsubwftted Limited EREFORE October I.86. P acemnt for the Rancho Cucam,nja, Calico nfa. as RESOLVED llows the City Council of the City of (' 1 That said behalf of said a 40or au�thnrtzed the strop and Agr attest City aW ithe y Clerk and thereto; th to execute sam oe 2. is authorized tp sufficient Iasubject $ecurft thereof b subject tp approval y is accepted Y the C,ty Attorney. an as to fo d as good and 3. fiat the taprevexenl yi and and content Securlt }• accepted October A9�eement the on and 15, I986, be released. w , •tom s , •� H' •v (� CITY OF RANCHO CLiCAM (J,`!GA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 , iLv TO: City Council and Ci SY Manager FROM: Olane N. Frandsen, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Accept cash purchase offer of $78,000 for sale of APH 229 - 261 -64 from he Terraden Corporation. Property located at intersection of Buffalo Avenue and 6th Street. the RECONMENUATIft M Accept cash purchase offer of 378,000 for sale of APN 229_ rem Terraden Corporation. AliAt.TSIS: At the regular Caunctt meetin of 229261 -64 11 Ho. 86 -113 declared its intention ttosell l /.c essor'siParcel Number Street. A Public ra ly located at the intersection of Buffalo Avenue and 6th the subject �n hgich was set for interested parties to submit bids for $90.000 was set by ounc lcbased upon May 21, 1986. A minimum bid estimated improvements of approximateei original Durchase Price of f78eSl7tand y 512,000. aA portion of the original 1.03 acre. parcel acquired by the City is reserved oy cres- he $78,Ooo cash a f ern for the netuacreagelofvt7l acres dcesaooto over the full Investment amount by he City with regards to the property, but does exceed Pattison on March 7, 1986 totaling S61,ODO.ppoperty as Prepared by Albert N. This being the only offer received since the resolution declaring and that Citent to sill. It IS recommended that the purchase offer e City's be account with a banded escrow r be directed to open ea escrow account with a th Including P haser, o'The� r aden iCorporat�ion' the no earnest fee received from and sellr, no saieitle realrestaten� A normal "distributlan of fees, reeot ng fees are th made between buyer V. docuQen pe that the City Nanagcr�betallowed shall De sign aid by the Cf escrow pertaining to this transaction. The It escrow cotapaRY shall be returned to the City Council c losing report prepared at he the Lcepletion of he transaction. The net fee received after payment of escrow fees shall be de posited in the Systems Development Fund for the use in future Capital Im rov R�espe(cttful7ly�6mitted, D extent Projects. Attachments �: , --.1 �9 w•. 1' OR LIN RI-S1 CITY O 1�l F RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE EXH1B APN 229 - 261 -(A w Y L; ' 30 ;■ Ip 1-t0. W*0C5M 0RA9s CAP I FOR N V4 CCA. Sea lC PER Fl9 44/64 GS. F b. Soo /cA .�b t GITY TLENO.4/22 001.1" Lb. REF ' p PM.8S50). In I w I 1 1 28227' 77 �l In N B9'44' O �q OI III ARErA=3oe4a409I►�° v• 17 o 2� P + I � v 0 l / / � Nfo3'37'3P" I / •4 F0.1" LP 4TAO "CITY / ENS R•CE 23609" / FLUSH uo ItEC o.04% E OF UU . Acc.TAS CU I SEC. 16, MEFPM BWO). 1' OR LIN RI-S1 CITY O 1�l F RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE EXH1B APN 229 - 261 -(A w Y L; ' 30 ;■ wL Wawa, n. w 0. "on Gvdnt Deed t01A YVp �N [I oIe b[r.ra°wrrar tlrry�TMWr The CItY or n anar --'1R "�wrWw rdyyrd CAP rura�de �rC�CIl1M �dY `^ni a. y�r Gllrernle 't' �4 aapy Cagy M�wd R9rq t. V Clt) e/ .rntle Crgo.dn 4 euerlwCW.au M In CM Argued tM1lit •An 4erw de �-- r..y ra rrwr"Aati.��°Yrr�ra. wy„r nr..�nr'rrrwar. �� °.rnrw.rre�rr °e�nwtinr��i�°n� � or nnrn 4rrr.rrw� U.µ ru mrcytm m . +rtr +eon x CrJU„egR`C WGII'4..aT11'ppye %11140 +nrw °°°rtic^wn tq a y,r t ; A RESOI UTtox OF 7HE R'SOLUi..N N0. Rte. _ A ACCEPiIA A CQ pURCRASE OVER FCZ R 7 SRAIMip AVENUE A p 6 s 1 D A7 THE IR7ERSEC7i0R OF BXALO A• Recd— property (t1 the CftJ of Rothe Cc laapnga is the Stree genora City iRanch the intersect, thet certain ffal hereinafter�s C1ty ° Rancho Cu c on of°Mner of refe7A ^said procy9ar County o, San Derna0 Avenue and 6th for in Exhibit A attached hereto and b th ssre%n ce letf abed calif, iawediate(fuAfre a tle in and to setd required for public purposes# is not and will (11 11 California not in the Govorrwent, Code Section 37350 Provides as Pollows: real city Oay purchase forthe s Personal Property ' control, hold, Joy oawon benefi to, ^ and dispose en n of (Iv) California Gove Pose oP 1t part, as follows: rrwent Coda Section 31351 provides, in Perttnent The legfsiatfve body (City Council) Of. aid convey such property for the 6ene;fp ofeltcsose occurred•(v) All legal ty• prerequisites to the ado ptior, of this Resolution have All hereby ar'e1OunREPa �, OE ti FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED of fated the Recitals, Part A. of to be true and correct. announce (111 The Council this Resolution conditions Corporation set tforthn 1a paragraph Pao off to accor Cucamnga does said Rancho Cuc If with the tares and 'su Mon to the Terraden and condition) PC; sale of said property rs conditions: prop upon the following terms a 3a CITY COUNCIL kESOLIf1TON`Mo. Buffalo _ -' � Avenue A 6th St. Property December 3, 1986 a Pago 2 p: Said the will be warranties shall attucroo rwos as 1 faults sold property by the City of Rancho Cucaaonga. yj b. The sate price to be paid by the purchaser of said property will be the sum of 573,000 Dollars. Y' C. A cashier's check made the City Cucamonga in the amount of ten percent (103) of ttheesa es ce a r %rantee the purchaser will consumate sale contemplated herein is her-' 'ved. -the d. a ? ace shall be company to open escrow of consumrting theTsalecand transfer of title for tie real property invo)ved. TM terms of the escrow shall be based upon a, cash transaction and a thirty day escrow pariod. A normal or stardard division of fees involved with the escrow process shall be considered between the City and Purchaser. ` t^ e. The City Manager,.Mr, Lauren Nassermn, shall be designated as signatur for all documents pertaining to this sale. r (iv) The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. r .i 4�7' p RN �41 I N EXHIBIT "A" That portion of Lots 37 and 38 of Rochester in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, as per map recorded in Book '9. Page 20 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 37; thence, North 890 45' 054 East along the MortB tine of,said Lot 37, c distance of 362.02 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 580.00 feet, i radial line thrnugh said point bears North 180 45' 264 Nest; thence Southwesterly slang said curve through a central angle of 520 34' 454, an arc length of 532.25 meentionad said last the North 710 s20' L1143West; radial thencelNorth 'through 09, 184 East along West line of said Lots 37 end 38 a distance of 362.02 feet to the Point of Beginning. Except therefrom; that portion beginning at a point on the North line of said Lot 37 a distance of 282.27 feet from said point of beginning; thence North 890 45' 054 East along North line of said Lot 37 a distance of 79.75 feet to a Point on a curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 580.00 feet a 45' hence Southwesterly halong said point rve throughoatcentralangle Ofs520t341 454 an arc length of 532.25 feet to a point in the West line of said Lot 38, a radial ling through said last mentioned point bears North 710 26" 1:4 West; tbanc North 000 09' 184 East along the Nest line of Lots 37 and 36 a,distance of e 79.70 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southeast )$ving a radius of thence Northeasterly alongisaid9curvedthroughtaacentr�l rya glelof 3a0 20, West; 44 an arc length of 408.19 feet to a point in the North line of said Lot 37, a radial line through last mentioned point bears North 250 52' 464 West, last mentioned Point also being the Point of beginning. Such real property being Vetainad by the City of Pancbo Cucamonga for street and realted utility purposes. Real Property Contains 30,840.40 Square reet. Exhibit 'B4 attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 3� ' 11yU� ON f) l: vt a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f DATE: Dececper 3 1986 i0: City Council and City Y Manager FROM: Rathindra (Shintu) Bose l BY: .Senior Civil Engineer Linda Beek. Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of MaP. Iaprovement Agreement and Improvement OfcSeventhoSt Street and Hellmaan Avenue su^bmit�od by Gold corner EWitY Properties. Y Golden Best IREDVME11DATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution a'provfn9 gptheel Map gg81 acce ting said a r authorizin p said map to record Yor and City Clerk to s1 n sald�agreement and security and 9 and to cause ANALYSIS /8A0i6R0U4D 1985, 1 for 9481 was approved b the Planning CoCmafsslon on October 23 Industrial Hall 8 aLedeon fthe northeast corner a Seventh Street and dppHellman Avenue, pp arttls in the General and s0ecuriltyr {0 9�arantee thEquity Pro ethos the following s submittingg an agreement g amounts: the off -site faprovemeee agreement Faithful Performance Bond: 5106,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 53,000 Office Copies of the agreement and security are available In the A letter of approval has been received from City Clerks's O/strict. Cucamonga County Mater Respectfully submitted, 4 it RSB:LB:cg Attachments 35 .y .K •+ptiyl Y+ I .,.1 :M W W t J W S �..��mn a.•.GGI CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMGI MMWG DI WoK 3� - �V pT�ME. PARCEL NAP 9481 CITY OF RAMCiq IMP MOMOT�ECV9MN PARCEL XAP 9581 (OR S5-48) Into, KI�� ALL MnEe^te with ESthPeRESEHTS- That this agreement of the City of Rancho Cue provisions of the'yuic Code fs made and entered hereinafter referred to a°s'°0theaC State of California, a municipal corporation Equity Properties hereinafter referred togas the Den said City and THAT, WHEREAS eveloper. Golden West said City located' on theme vgo�d{reaztdesires corner oP develop certain Street l pr erg Avenue; and property Y 1n WHEREAS, sold City e, )man "aveloper as Prerequisite te to establish requirements q ements t be met by said approval; and o ecution ucite Of this approved by nt and posting Of Improvement Y as hereinafter cited securing said approval. �r cOmPletton of said etulrClty Attorney, a e deemed 9 emants for the purpose of Developer asHfollow;,. it is hero, agreed by and between the City and the frnprov. The o Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all Page 4 hereof within 72 months frcm the date hereof. Z• This said agreement City shall be effective on he date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. default an the ion following the first anniversary date o} unless an extension of time has been This agreement shall be in Provided. granted b said Approvet Y said City as hereinafter 3• The Developer may request additional tf provisions do Of and. tncjw�nt, 1n statement g not less�thut 30cda to llQt° the additional time In consideration ofnsuch requesttathes City necessity right to review the to the adjustments and sufficiency hereof, lncludin Y for J ate, thereto when warrantethe improvement g construction standardses the bstantial security, and to • cost y substantial changes therein. require If the Developer be cumpleted by or negtectrlghtc�la with the provisions of this agreement. the City shall have the said Developer and /or his Y any ?Awful man thereupon time to to caus,! recover from at doing. Surety the full from cost and expense incurred :n so 2990 East G St fie 104 Ontario CA 91764 37 off iceof Construction the City Parer Prlorlito a obtained b with tthe r�� and the developer shall start of any work Developer from the Of the warkgbl the C contained therein, conduct within the tj Y the City, and assess fOn- cOmPifance rakU In full ° Ianc confo D- -Public right -of went °f Penalties IComP lance conformance with approved, improvement . Provided, PPing If any Drat gs and any spee veMent rk required snarl constructed 1n drainage l r transit tons aeenyne,�s standard Specifications and tlan sAat Public safer a°d /0r. other Incidental wo thereto ' due me 1 be corre "cted,� Errors or omNissicns discovered �sYructfon shall agr 1did Plan modfficntlo�l direction of deen�d necessary Bement and secured 6 shall b tA`1 city En in durin9 coristruc- C0MPl tion;iothe City with nheezistia covereiny °tho or 9tna1 p annefd'1pn js °f this event Of un�ustiff Y shall have i ti greets shall incurred fram the 0 eio a in c right to ue diligently Per and toprecoverY and all Woorksfndthe I and /or, his contractor 6 ..I1 cost and removal of a Developer shat) be r Y a eYPense required nY lawful means. water NDrk�to�e °satisfactf °rpfgtheonewat or r sysiamcemfnt, relocations, or system, g• The Developer shat City Engineer and th,7 01 ner with of the ether debris from thl. _.s 1 be 10. Devel ngnt -of -wa the Conaunity DevelooPer shall Plant Pment Director, and guarantee The lMroveaent security security oil a eCity' t orn yrms of a pr be Y shall than the amount Type: Nane and address of surety: Type: N" and address of surety: Type: Naa° and address of surety: FArIWZt PDr Principal Aaount: 06111P14 MO L0.804 Principal "O"t: ! DEPOsir Principal Aaount; IN y! TO OF posit dates Seecuteed5;nI' - the Parties �I`� ACCtpTW, er Oate forth oPPOSltnowledgo hereto TW CITY by their si9natu�es. formalftleS s�e9ulre th 9nature Date II Y2 ' Lair Developer ` h rnea Y u 9na '"re Accepted; r ne BeveloPer D City Of Ar�C A larnic fP ° °� CorPOrada7 °. California By; Arrest: Y or N4YOr Approved; LY Attorney D&fCONo SI61N ICA Tr 5106.000 $ 53.000 S 1.300 Present hy' to law ontho Gil SUADrrrSZON City council iSEr7r o I, DR %CE 7 City Of Rancho 'uT5 Rancho C ca o�ga California 91730 Centivaen: Pursuant to undersf Chapter 4 HaP 9481ned hereby agrees Articie 9 on or before to be agrees that etj Sectlon 66497 of eROfOeerin Cer care ann afurnished by tilessuhdfvfder�he lnal Mao Code, the of equ, Me rnea 'oderst9ned handsnts speeifled o Sen 5 thssPeceis tehern9tneer9ineu�vecel the note Sef sup said d 6oveftreblth thntsum 8649 Of the 6 �l a 9euap C de ,�r It I the eu9lneErrnfshed as survoyor bill bee Paid bn Or beforehthsedaen stNkoI a as c�Pleterther under �Yb��zT c °Q nga is authorfiedfraementsreed that in the eveOt9ned, 'Peciffed and 'that and 1eted and t to n the the Cft he cost cO Plete times the under from safd cash d Posfao Cucampa�al/st0 beid re specified , the Cited fails to it y COUncll that that If the t forhthe pro 0 MClt the safd cash de Rancho e Cit further a credit ized gafnstr them to iffinaI mono he ra$ the undersf Per y fundecessary transfer or sur"YOr 6the7 ofdthe Cove engineer or sure rdsus� YorPfesent evidence :c If the coati •posit ere! Code, the t gives the sett!, the or p eposlt the Cost Of herein made, the City shall the notices g of `ne said �unt Op the f ttte jeat eesdtoap rements exceeds Pay to said engineer Cordially equfren,<nts, dffferenc emebet"enomthee CltyfofeRae b thin thl of the cash �F.J W�$T cash dePositcand the nga s cosft 9 sfkE� P. Subdlvid., Date Address be dePositer of record (for return Of aO Y Portion E,24t1 Qd0 ,4 °f the cash deposit) shall ee strevrrr>a, Flnr r t rasa, T. Qoce 8eun• ntrb AND 5rcnr, 14 1RrP °�' �rCArE 'iL 1106' i For Improveen,,. Date: R-16- File a nr�' e QUmU 1JN /T 085' �r- L.I L. F, S. F. C. Y. S. F. S. F. Ton S. F• EA Eq. . EA. EA. S. F. EA. S. F. CITY OF RAIM ENGINEERING � DIYIC A �GA �METR PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE . ...� IN• NOTE- Doe 3 ' not include current fee Permit or pa deposits for ITEM " C.F. Tq. A.C, hermr8.- 12 gutter PRICE AMOUNT St P, C. C. sidewalk Street excavation 7.50 4.50 — 3 487 Crushedtagg of sub rode Pvmt- area ':h 1.50 914 50" 3�0' Inch 0.15 A.C. thick 0.03 thick •� Ag•�SOOStonsjr A. C, ovdrigv Adjust water valves 40.00 .ao�yn Q_ to SA eet lights grade 0.30 • �u•00 Street signs relocate Reflroin 1000.00 :2550-IM and posts Typ,i •G. R�taltting wall 200,00 ---+,� High x 6561) 5awdr�aping b fr 35.00 xis ut S Remove P.C.C. Pvmt. 20.80 1 20 ENGINEERING 'RESTORATION %DELZNFA OM �q51{ $4 ��65 CEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) j�T�D�trD 5UB TOTAL "ONLWENTATION SURETY (CASH) S1 3DO FA TIIFULNp1Y'R LSTS (T5 %) S 91842,31 LABOR AHD MATERIAL C60NpN( 100%) �vb 3s *Pursuant w Cfty of ' ) 3'S3' -� Bernardino de pr Crotty Cnde�r{tl Cucaamnga M,otifeipal Code 71tTe °n� prior toy of at apter,.r1 apterY Y -5. a cash restrratl�n�� ter 1.08• adopting San Revised 3 /Bq n9 Constructfgi P /dallratfon Permit. akPosit shall Ti• A 9.• it" 1 1 r t CUCRE�ur RESO[UTtgy N0, D (TgT�AQTfly, CALIFO '�` CITY COUNCIL o �' 3 1NPROYFyaT gEC &�rry ? N0. ^ y V NG P OF INE Ct� ,3 7 Equity p NHERQS . Il1PR9Ypy�l � Rti4CN0 lorner °pert '� Tentat,ve AGREW6i YT, 1L1 state' +. S f 6 )laynSAv and consIParcel broil Of pull orntod BuoJ' nd Sevk 9 orrpRParc9481, submt °mafsston Ofltheustva�s ter Plat NaP f >?4�, be, Spa located on - c tde approved NNER Clty of Aen-hc of s ld ed tni8�lw Cout�tsion of @ �. -.Rust ovad as shy' oercel M eLcea�ngaco °nty �asp2 of Parf San Keels 1� C. approval MNEREAS, n sold )pntatt��8! is eh n G:tobeF73r1985•by l's, Page the Security),, entr !n the .tne)) of the s F cal HaDJ Hal aap of and Planning an frolden etj,� vaeDertrF y�aourrs� es'abT the division of land Ranch Ntp quit. Pr event l of (shed anprovoq cucd;69 EPenvr, gE oPOretos a'a�ntOe$4 fd City havrcrequisi e to thDP sold and ttthe -NUO S:f4 %ft�fa b 4 see y t avCfter acccpAAbia apron nt par at of lYOr nd s he border 1s autho fled to �t Ranch. CLIC r be ftent A 11 Of ard� eeementt and said of Drelent all . the sr and the said rian ,Same are . said a. r .:ATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF AN RCHO CU(' STAFF REPORT December 3, 1986 City Council and City Manager Slane N, Frandsen, Sonfor Civil Engineer and Feaslof)j Professional Services A re G,P,S, ConsultingSEn9fneor the Area VII it', sOr Alignment I REC"EWATIou It is recommended G•P•S. Consultin that the attached professional Services A ree the2,Area VII St4 Civil Engineers for Alignment 8 tore Drain aPProved, ihemcontracFeaslbill nqy for 00 to De funded by Systems Develo t' Stu the Redevelopment Agency, t amount is Pment Fun° to De reimb reimbursed py �N•VSIS /DAfJ(��, 7ho subject drain, sometimes runs from the Deer Creek mes referred to as h °point west of along the south Lower Turner Storm Drain, through the Cucamony7yar °er Avenue, then of North Route ot to a north fo11ow1n ry' School's nwestecrossing Feron�Str t dral Elementa to aproximately NcKinlean existing Y and CcdargAvenue+ge courseicr9rouna, then The Marking will be crossing Arrow Park facility located west Turner and° detsh1gns for the In response to 50 ° of Feron. new North Town receivedbare as listed osals for request for kn g firms Proposals tha sub three an below: workings. Tho9 feet pr G. P, S. Consultin ProPosu�s 9 evil Engineers Madole and Assoct tes, Incorporated (3.230.00 Der 'sh Guerra r,d Associates, IncOr u $4,700,00 e,. su Po Res ted P ^.• fully fitted, $12 , 84o,D0 e cc1.i rAM Of This Agreement PROFFSSIO•AL SERVICES AGREE?0T Corporat 0 19g6ssbatwgi and the City Into this Engineer (hereinafter een as s (hereinafter referred to Clty of Rancho Coca referred CITY•) and ''un9a day A. Recital i` to as •C(WSULTANT•). O.P.S ' a N+nicfoal (i) Consulting civil the an o A119nmxsnt ns:e1 f Professie sore Issued its hereafter) and tonal Stu 1 s r Request f Pro service Rues or Y dy for 1n respect theosal Pertaining to (!f) Aroa VII Stony Ore fPreParatfon of of such servtces,CWSULTART has now o' ( °Project. (1fi) submitted services CIT'/ desir ed its praPOSai for necessary to render C(W Co',"issten es to retain the Performance seryIces .,d sty auSUCT andretaPfl fn the pre istan�Ttto Perfor sfonel and proles defined. and Is w1111n- AYT Presents that paratfon op TVs planning ned, Project. 9 to Perform such Profe t is Ruailfied t follows: RCy THEREFORE sstonal 1t is services a Perform such e' regiment. agreed by and as hereinafter fci low inglte Oeffnitions: between CITY ano CQ'ISULTAHT as rKulres; (ass except where ,e tha1lOwing definitions shall study for the ) Pro ect: The of n °s apply to the hereto 1,clu Area VII St onn a preparation Of A9reeasent Otherwise wise reports, and documents, the ted to Exhlbtt • • fn9. but 1 din described fn alignment and feasibility Plans not 11 din the A at any and all reports Presentation, bot PrwParatfon oPScope of Services work se CITY with respect to thesproject aso earin9soandTM as reRUfred tf 9. of such !r hr as outlined 1. the other meetings attendance -1. Scope of Se 95 conducted by Services. Perf °�Cd (b) Service Of the Project- ( 4t C °rdeur to tofessfona/ aervf sUn"eya, Ject; lnclud lion of Pro aPlete the cos as are attenden Plan documentsln9 any and 411 ts The date of -ct. neC °ssary to be "now for consZuctfon s@ ortePUb)fel re0ortsoce Upes- d veaesent °f allPhasus �SU`T art in Ex hearings pay 9s, era; Plans, m In acs ('•J p rep1 hl6it .p, prardin9 the PrsSentatfnns ups, accordance Ml fsULTAryT SAal f arllows: °Jett ScAedule at �t a Ptan ed WWI un statutes acre action ofulat s. loch satisf (b C1 0) ° dInande sad IIcab /eaNttrye and cQgp /eta ed hereto plans and dot) CLMIa�_: d'T guidelines, a;deral, aa�e a ProJect ncfuatn9 elI suaantt (beret, ball suPPly c i to the r and CITY the Tf sfthfn tqe PP nta/ to attcelcolleetfv y of all su easo °a610 may documents ah tt $Aecif /e "Cal val referred maps n'eya. reports dac the 11 r. I be In such in PrOJe�t S s' as descrfb ad to as .docu;, ' dohtmX,nttt and r��,�eM and fob Fabars as are 'du le. Exbtbt<i, Exbfblt -A. ts7 set h form It'd feetyl.aVeda^eC Scull thereof eQrl�ICTA,vrl ant ablb t .Cop fes fo CITY dpProva /tof Clry ant etovth Fes dtermi eQ Shall Make recesu revfsrenard=�9 said pupsu tons secure a °d h1rC) C $lLT Sectfon ne�ssbe by V1 revised documertsSdfd The Ile. tAer sary to c°aAlu's other PerShall, at CnY extended upon tame limits Other are y wlth the sons as A, �1CTiYyT,s le °'''itten Person shat; a retaIn b terns of Ih1s in the °Pint cost and e C a'9JL 4" fur be full 9ua� CWSULT,tyT, Agreement on Of COY xPen:e, 4YSULTgyT agre S that droo Perform Lsvfhereby arrant nil any T "h Performance (a) a To s as follow wwrlt ten approval oar all be Ae eandurch the all stiff ot. a servIces p4Yr1 T a Ctry retafrsd by ma h'ork of ertG;a1e Ind 'I? u) her r,!Ct ender. fits sum of shall 3 Cover the for the .ubcontroctor Costs over the cost fees ,z s to COISUL TAN l' including ; �! Pdy rent to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordanr- with the schedule set forth in Exhibit W. (b) Payments to CONSULTAT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "A" either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, howevor, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Exhibit W. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sim, in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of ali rinal documents, together with all supplemental technical decuments, as described herein a,:ceptable to form and cunt -nt to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services •equested, in writing, by CITY, and not included to the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C ". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 6 CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" he. eto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the pro,7xt. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties However, it shall be ; i CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the , gathering of such information. S. twnership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, r; drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT - s -3- s 44 s r ed I I/ 1 Pursuant to to pdYaent for this Agreement sha11 "Owing however fiedmmater services rfo+yrd byconsfdered the CONSUL and Pr eke LT TayT myy d e ,tat s� deItVerd t by'C such do ��n stTY and, upon COP 1es ry fXISUL rmI. and of Intended Any use or reuse Of said doc C her Ctry , or umentt t4,t,rf.9T�yY. it S staff alteration of the Plans the Coy or out °. revistcasofd specfficntfon and �aaterfals as narmles �/LTmr shall b,, ortzed agents VI thou the plans s "cept at Inc. and defense the COYSUCTgyrisk ofWhet Ct sPectfic wrftteatfons by the ° . anoth cost, artsfn T against ry. CITY n consent of 6'. 9 out of any such a] another site b 1 dame 91vfn9 of Termfnat Y the Ctry ges. c grass a Written ion: thI, its •clff teratlon 1afmS and IC Irolo (IS) d Vat agreement or revision, or sses or event tA1SPrior to theMdtIce of Terminment ar4, be teuthorized agents, use Ag r4t basis I' a p� hlef s soe �f�lnatfognSpeciff ,L7.,Wr tYI try upon tho date s with res hourly rat ed' CONSULT led In said east fifteen shall Of term, the max not to 'a the CITY faorm specified stn no event,ebcentagescf they i4 &hibft °�ensated at C(MSULTraPhsn and ire PO � sardata,h S a), abovell C'NSULrANT id a$ f the an a Pro Agrea4 T as of date reports. studies In suney�S7llZANI, shall receive eqr than demands, i �chotices au of te+mination. dr�S'UCTAgTinaTawf form, Maps' Provide aadalsto furthe address as invoices sC Mated Pe resentat/ves: not te�i to � sY and rmora th t cotton M by the PartlesshalI be those n this Paragra S between the y and at, not En r and 1n 6ehunder this is �rpersons prfmar1 yT The below nrties hereto shall es' ginner en elf of th eegpnt: re$Ponsf aced individuals ail dr c ations f the City Ilan! �d Blane Die for the Per olm. tten c"++++n 1c mat) e forty -efght (44 amflz shay such notfceN Frandsen. S dfta Postage PrePafd and properly add., er dePOtftp Cher have beend . invoices Cand ssed as $at forth abD ee United Statese Agreement 9. Insur unt ° CCMSU or companies it it has obtained LTANl shall neither all I u conk until work -on l a to subco ror shall CCMSf)LT Tr red hereunder this nsurance subcontractor under ntrectar has been oDtafned. all tiffs act until AMT allow ° company insurance: the all lnsur any subcontractor ante: taro Of* shall tokpnce required of C 'NSULTANT (a) *rker,s �re°°e^t the toliowinand m°lntafn at shall furnls C ensation g Policies of ""Igloo has taken wit foil h to CI7T a loser PQp1oY dlract workers, c certificate Mce; &fore be MY or throe 01pmsation of tnsuranee 91nn1ng, work. herein. 1n accordance eh subcontractorslIurance as Proof With t for ail Persons whom it may Section 3700 I^ the ^ carrying out eaploYees. . every alpioy �ancelwi h the p'oVte of Cailforo ahr work specified cons, a cert shat) secure tslns of Ce /Ifo fffcat (cation as I oPrIor to re the pay..nt oP COA�encfng work compe sfa Labor Code •1 shall si atlon to his Code which require am aw °re of caapensation ever the Prov /s g^ and file With CITY to ° that Code, and undertake self insurainsured against ,,, 3700 the lab oP of the will cospl ^Ce in accordance a6111ty for workers- such or tht (b) public eP this Agreement.. ProvislonsbefortD the Provisions Ors Agreement. at CO'1SUCiabllit and Pro er a Colzmencing the autoap f eUllgsu kee0� ehen force land cost eff ct eC�se� Cgfiyro ghoul the term of insurance a9ainste• broad foroct• for nr,tua)lT shayl keep . - Or death the orrdeath to er�trlast 0^enMfilsog ®Pr� C f 911tfes foriperliabllltY and One M111ton RTona ion OoIlar LTgryT�s actfv sonal Injury, Person ^ or for an ne s (SI,Opo,000.p0 ft1es, Provfdin (t1,Op0 OOD.00 Y e accident or % for bodily (cJ Error g at ail for pr0PertY d injury insuranCetcon during them l tssfons. CQ'15U r ageoccurrence and at )east concernln ]if L,ANi shall loss at least $250,000 for ors and mi this Agree take loss omissions (.�Iaxnt, a Policy out and maintain arising froW Pract er Policies of hereunder actlonsrof CON�CTsfons Ice•) Ming on behalr oP CITY. of ( malpractice• Protection AqT Performing engineering respect to -5 services (d) General Insurance Requirements: All Insurance required by express provision of this Agreament shall be carried only in responsible Insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required 'under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All Policies shall contain language, co the extent obtainable, to the effect .hat (1) the Insurer, insured ami all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the Insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such poliries promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the Insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, Indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, In any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the Maximus extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and Its employers, officers did agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accord+nce with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' feas and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. -6- y 14. _Entire Aoreement: This Agreement supersedes any and All other agreements, either.oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subJect matter- herein. Each nartY to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which 1s not embodied herein nor many other ajraement, statement, or prnatse not contained in this Agreement shrll be f,- valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by -all parties. ¢ IN 4ITNESS IIHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement _ as cf the day and yew flrit set forth above: t a: " G.P.S. C�ONS�ULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS / f e eg•!• - CITY OF RANCHO ^UCAMONGA 7 nn s oU . a—p yor — cafe a ATTEST: ` every e e y er Approved as to form: ty orney "— e• -i- SD I Y+,M1 i :100 W, ■b J ' u 11 EXHIBIT •A• SCOPE OF WORK Professional- Services fAr Alignment Study for Storm Drain connection to Deer Creek Channel, Drpinage : id Olt. Work to include the following: I. Minimum of three alignments 2. Construction cost comparison 3. Existing topography 4. Existing utiiities (including substructures) 5. Physical constraints 6. R/W requirements 1. Requirements proposed by the San Bernardino Flood Control District and the Corps of Engineers 8. Construction at Turner Avenue and the existing channel The fee for the proposed study is $3,210.00 (lump sum). A $2,400.00 credit will be nada back' to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event that E.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers is awarded the design contract for the ensuing Storm Drain project. l - S/ } .r A C"Ieted 1%H1817' •8. P eed9 on or e � @ bet De�er 4 98 POvId the City 1986 et on Rancho ton t3 1 =r srvtces) EXHIBIT •y. µ Notle9ber 1986 SCNEOULE OF k0'JRLY Rp1Es S0M'SYOr technfcranlandSCaPe A+'chttect $ 76 /hr 58 /hr 69 /hr 43 /hr 38 /hr' 65 /hr 108 /hr 111 /hr' 173 /hr 22 /hr, RESDLUTION No. 61� 33 � RAW-Po RES'N.UTIfUf OF nit CITY COUNCit FOR AGREEIENT FOR Ni APPROVING A PROFESS, OfiALE Ctry OF IV AREA YIt ISTORN °PAN" TM GGIILIT1' STUDY FOUR CIVIL ENGINEERS P.S. CONSULTING and ftasf fty stucv Prep Rancho Cue Aree YIlS Ston gn•tnt Paned far �0n to Gyve an all for Proppsajs red Consulting Civil En Drain; and perrorw the desired ;e response to a request Rancho Clc v"� �ilfoeia� hat,. By CfU Council for the City Feasibill The Professional LY °f Civil Eng{ Hers is for reby aPPreveslleSt°wap +in wttl an aiig�eent and The Na G.P.S. Consulting On thereto. Of LheyCity�Of Rancho C caas 9r, the saae Cibehatf of tta City 3• The Cf Clark attesting the C, work tforward ceeeeE execugted afire t4 of Rancho CaCaagnna IS authorix:d the consultant to ditho the E,` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA o STAFF REPORT r/"y DATE: December 3, 1986 ten TO: Cit,/ Council and City Manager FROM Paul A.,Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to obtain bids for the Construction of Traffic Signals at fivo locations RECCONNOWIGN, It is recommended that the attached Resolution be approved for the advertising for bids for the construction of these signals. The City's 1986 -87 Capital Improvement Program lncludos three (3) traffic signals at the following locations: o Base Line Road at Alta Cuesta Drive o Base Line Road at Amethyst Avenue o Archibald Avenue at Ninth Street Also lncludrI is additional work to coordinate the signals on Base Line Road between Alt.. Coast& and Haven Avenue. T)tal cost of the signal work is estimated at $250,000.00, of which $50,000.00 would be from Gas Tax and f200,000.00 from System Fees. Respect /��eitted, PAR:ko Attachments 6i• t f If RESOLUTION N0. 84 - 33 / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND ;PECIFICATI0M5 FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT BASE LINE ROAD /ALTA CUESTA DRIVE; ;1ASE LINE ROAD /AMETHYST AVENUE; ARCHIBALO AYENUE /NINTH CITY CLbK1 TO ADYERiSEAWTO RE�jyg I05� DIRECTING THE certa NHEREASmonga to construct in improvements in tha City of Rancho Cucamonga. wdEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamongqa speaiflcatlons for the construction of certain fl Prepared plans and has sies nt. by NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans andppsDcfficatins presented specifications for 'TrafffcSignals at Base Line(toadYrOe Cuesta a Plans8and LIna Rcad /Amgtlp it Avenue; Archibald Avenue /Ninth Street', BE l tFadver aVrei the tlh f directed ovti a qured by law for rc l and receipt Of specifications, nos, which said work ertisdp^jit nell be s aforesaid ubstantially 1n the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SJU.EO BIDS OR PROPOSALS' GIVENPursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, that Bernardino Said Cl alifornia, direct nril(Isn veca, O the ICE IS HEREBY City Clerk to the Offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on Orf bfefore tthhe hour of 2:00 o'clock P.N. On the 30th day of December, 1986, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Traffic Signals at Base Line Road/Alta Cuesta Drive; Base Line Road /Amethyst Avenue; Arc lbaid Avenue /Ninth Street' fn said I:ly. ' Bids will be Oponed and publicly read immediately In the offfee of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, City 8ofsRancho Cucamonga, ICaliforn ? a. lurrked�'D d�forrCoonstr ctt ns f Traffic Signals at Base Line Road /Alta Cuesta Drive• Base Line Road /Ametnyst Avenue; Archibald Avenue /Ninth Street', ' RESOLUTION Dec e ar 11 G 3CPL 9 8 SPECS . o' FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS PREVAILING P visions of Notice !s ra 2' the Con "Itfornfa Labor hereby rat°h0f perub)ic aprketsfor9uynkda P4Y n°n SSPart 1, ^rhapterance With the Md Directpr dies wa Performed a sisflar chalhan tle generaj Articles 1 fs requfr�d tthoaandr�enLOr hold' and not less acttehe f^ the loea Yaflfn wages. Co of Indurtal °vertfap MO n general lily n Suftee� f theeCity Cier Prevaillnadrauch generalons °f the St+tthatfre9ard, )the Party on Reecho Cuc yyy rates of per dlreYafling rate C +l{fornta Call ietenafnattonsest. n Contractfnrniaf Ranch nw +9es a �s of per die, to 6 , and 9 +. 9320 8ase Lf In the e P°sted at the Job site aiso available to each f0ne Road Cucasonga Contractor shall farfelt, _ •lechanfc �Y ff py Of such 1.�_ elnL.._.� Ye Anfi_.. _ Y Of WorkawnBnCOr f• ff such vallIn e Ion attached Of the °P#Oyed {- - rvrenttceship Cound I accordance Labor Attention is he Prosecution o/ Code Con the Labor Co directed the workPerly tndentuthe tractor or a co epovlsfons in red under YmentSeoffo^s 1777,8 and subcon CernIr DIo ing to 1777.5 PPrentf esnfdessen •in amended his. app-.,) tices by 7 the eertiffCate Ofterss ee aearn bees, require ontract3p or subcontrac on tract. es to Journ Val. P The tcership Drograhma Pubifc aPPly Ica contract, works the Joint be less than ne ?a! five z� nticesl as � dfin {the oPerfor �roatfo of A. When u^ey to the rephasyment in the area ^such cases hall not 8 to the request forecertificYe, geco }a IS pp ceMe in theapprentfeeshfp When number of ate, or ratio ofcOne to five- f 413 rentices in trai • 90 days Prfor C. Whe me°'bershhi trade can show °'d9 in the area exceeds a at It I statewide or io ell y, o P e ticeships t ate {egg o least annu ° aj 6a its s CITY CODICIL RESOLUTION No. APPROVINGG PLANS S SPECS, FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS December 3, 1906 Page 3 D• When the Contractor provides evidence that f "aft one apprentice toh.i Contracts en an ammo,. ,vrrage of not less than one a veeage registered Right journeyman. the The dmInisractor 15 required to make contributlans to funds established for 0Ppre ntontractar surneymenalnrentfceppship Programs other Contractors on file public wo�kseslteeare e trade oeasucchhPcontractsiandrIf Baking such contributions. The Contractor and s0contractor under his shall ca 1 requirements of Sections 177 ,5 and 1777,6 in the employment of apprentices. T y Mth the Information relative to apprenticeship standards, other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of A Francisco schaduies, and from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards its branch offfces. D. San Francisco, California, or workeigiht (0) hours of lahor shall constitute a legal Played in the execution of this contras subcontractor under film shaTt craipl 4Con work fcr all State of California havis y with and be l and the L ° °p'actor and any 2. Part 7, Chapter fO 36 Ply working hou�svasn Set bforth in Division as aw.nded. pLer 1� Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, employed in the execution of the contract D , of Rancho ,hm, upon any of the work he' con y him or a' warkmar, or mechanic which sat d laborer mentioned, for each calendar aday wring more than eight (8)* hours or mechanic is requfred or �1' during 9 (re hours in violation of said Labor Code, I+aniltted to tabor to to execute the work ye s er atrravel and subsistence pay to each workman need d Payments are defined to the a ifthis contract as such travel and subsistence in accordance with Labor Code Sectionl1773.gctive Dargai�tn The bidder must submit Mth his 9 agreesents filed Check. or bidder's bond, Pay to Proposal Gash, cashier's equal to at feast ten ty oP Rancho Cucamonyae {o� an certified that the bidder M11 eritereirtolt�he Of the amount of said b/d aunt to him• and in event of failure Proposed contract if t'e as a guaragtee cashier's check, certified check, ore bond shahobeco�. ` traCct said wcash. t City of Rancho Cucamonga, the p''oDarb of the tf the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to bidder, the amount of tha lowest bidder's security shop be applied City of Rancho Cucamonga Lo Uv i bidder's bet next fewest forest bid, and the surplus, if n t>.een the low bid a the second Y, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. APPROY�CI, qES Dec NB PL �D'ION NO Page e4 r 3. 19864 SPECS. roe JXWIC SIG44LS Th. aunt C0°tract for °f the pri of�l °Phlj�ef,saa dwa Coalars contract done cOntracteda� a+ate the that he Carrie and tl�e C done and es con Rancho Cue �e09aa 0o ' f: VillDppn M0'itten 9u 1r re f a, ed when of av ring ard" ddll shad be o en to an kadditional °v hundred r faithful na °jrar bond 1. 4 rcent ontrbyothe AP leskPUha1I be 91ren9u� to fr�nconL�aC! etlondrsurancal$0 be re9afally derk orPer oven eP*Ynent to secure -he Percent h EBY be erin to of °f the construct, on° a d said wo �n�himoand ltuposaiwo k toaibe onsl ,Sloes of s• -_a Cons.._. d City Of Pursuant he I Sectio of Rancho CUcdNonga. to done 14 Y of R coranchojance with ,nwlltabe' senchoeCue ° _Pole and overhead." satlsPacto y °to th City will In ty of Rancho Provislonscordance with contracted td bet forth I requ. authc�fior S re4uesidona by the P, Who eese not 11c S"9 -) Low (C'IifOr in sal form he rules pInd aniedrbtle Plans PaNaen� of nntt to ed securr ties aI at the Con2etractor,SPeciflcatlon$OZ Of the Ge and ell bids of Rancho Cuclemon9ef conies "tractor, sole oojy 9.t� nor U By or • California reanc , substitut der °P t/,a ' reserves a �tentipn). Dated this Council of the City the right W of Rancho Cpc relect any California AAlgs lr bof �_ aar°nga. California. dj of ° Council Of �ogC�' Attu. ��, 19_ b' of Rancho Cucamonga, tY p� and the Of Of CITY OF)�,C 5�� REpO'��rvcA �._ DATR: to: D°caber 3. 1986 i Dagtt city council By.. Jio Rare, ddDt° d Cl tr Naaeder deAidct: n dlerfn° I/eioteaaace dOr1•iees at �8 • d ° dtlDer•Jteadeur �S ddC d It to 0 8 nor teabla I oneDd rod o hIn Pick that the City d °tr°ed d11,70 t8 atee tyN cN Uotmell oblehl approve tha dad << - mod`+ °b. °1.art° vra o f.La�n to Drerloryjp io park tha d6�P1D en o Zbe 7D ➢reeloue the ro research! IJ carte for discovered et t Dar approved as the has V °ahav eau cost f the , r durable s° °Deeial part of as 1986 B7 l,. and sled a dol to obtained are tr t)Da Vehicles. lDick pa yaehltl°s, Qllv it aeeera2 d°alea. �e Dbtalnad for the p�jttt d9ot &zdebiehl dellato 'Dd Prices are lute z1ol Peeut dfeaeq dJ 0 desDeetroll d s itieat uhas4a 05-9 46.00 Der watt .'— L`I't /' /� + a4l teed, �D $3.869 00 per Unit d7,6 per unit unit 'Ii' !tart 'iJ)jtcvatratiej Services Director ,��. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT' BATE: December 3, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Rental of Vaetor Equipment RECONiEMDATTON: It is recommended that the City Council approve the rental of Vactor -type equipment for use in the Maintenance Section Catch Basin Cleaning Program. Background /Analysis In an effort to increase efficiency and minimize exposure of aaintenance Personnel to the hazards of entering storm drain structures, staff has solicited the proposals from two local equipment companies for the rental of specialized equipment for the purpose of evaluating the performance of such equipment in our catch basin cleaning program. In past years the Catch Basin Cleaning Program has keen completed by ' maintenance personnel using the 'shovel and bucket" method. This labor Intensive program necessitates entering debri clogged storm drain structures and pipes which are often half full of stagnant water'and unknown debris. The program is expanding rapid;y to include newly accepted systems within residential and commercial areas. Staff feels that the timing is right. << Respectfully submitted, �Z>Ae'd MP:08:cg .i: DATE: TD: FREN: BY: SUBJECT: REI MQtL4,t O SIVQIr � TS fj0 CuoA REPO tr Deceaber 3, 1.986 City Counef l ,and City Manegr, RatAtndra (SAfntu) Boll Se" id? Crvfl Engfner.. LCrsa Lek. Engina,,: fng Teen. it .en. IWProva) of IagivOYtme I ftw- iaDme� aa..��lrri�fat a,iae�.,a; a, 1'rov%Wftt CC KWO .te ;+= rr'�"C Pa►ated. u� Avea 0. ' Iat !� cars ,of Y +ubiel ted as iarCln J. it S 4tcepting � frd� tr -t Via Crrt 1 :?Irk to silo •e a ayr�ene¢� ku rity ,nt� audtAo�1 =,� aCN� r*tol,ticR rS"Jr Nutrs amd clj, s�BAn• - -,,� Trw covelwc- Wur 1'iann t fo'.lo4iln oayt -r ee tAls' gtraP'r8W fa +amilCf� F"tafef Perrarmll!�y k! off-sue �r.,�*7�9rP^!7' i B,.0 s0. t Dles of Ltbor tnd Rate,.., Bewl: }e• pi a Mr'"saent alld teCrlP'f tt• a-e ark, 'Nk in te Cr � of Wor' ty ?f s Dfst" • Ptyr RsWeetfully suwrftted, XAR,44�?, ?se-19mg aunt!' k'a4 i ,Zvi V b r s�•u � I •• �t t t J� 1 L, 1 t to r r 1a t r w .\ I C :• A� 1 ' f ' r �i �3 MjR 1r 6' 1 CITY OF RANCHO COCNRNIOA 141PiiOYDiE11T ASRED"T FOR •`i OR WOS KNOW ALL MM BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is nude and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the M:nicipml Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, e municipal corpuration, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and 14artin J. Jaska. Incorporated hereinafter referred w as the Developer. THAT, HHFAFJLS, said Developer desires to develop certain reAl property In said City 1icated on the scuthwest corner of roothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS. the etecution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, aie deemed to be equivalent to prior covpletion of said requirements fur the purpose of securing said approval. HOW. THEREFORE. it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense 1 all improvements described on page 4 hereof within U months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be to default on the day following the first anniversary date c said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said r! as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional Lice to which to ceuolete the provisions of this agreemxnt, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including improvement nsecurity. and to require ! adjustments thereto iahen warranted by substantial chAnges therein. 4761 Arrow Highway Montclair, CA 91763 4 if the Developer fails or neglects :o comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall -have the right at any tim to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to , recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. �;• S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the r•' office of the My Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the developer shdll conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations `contaihad therein. Non - compliance may result in stopping of the work by OW City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public, right -of -way improvement work required shall be constructed in conformance. with approved iapruier_nt plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or ommissions discovered during construction shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Fevised .rork due to $did plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of Gets agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7, work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to tonpletlon; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover ttl cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful mans 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replac4ment, relocations, or removal of any component of ai,y Irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Enqlneer and the owner of the water system. g. Th e Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris frcm the public right- of -waj. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Cummunity Development Director. 11. The improvement sece -Ity to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said Improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown; FAITHFUL PERFORKWE Type: Principal Amount: Nave And address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Principal Amount: N&ae and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONN1Nf11TATION Type: Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: 110 BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY 8,000 4,000 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth oppatlte r signatures . Date Ltt. LJfo-j Dy�ure #AsJ f .., Developer Roger M Jaska rinte ^' Date by Developer Signature Printed Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation • i 8y: Mayor Attest. City er Approved: _ ? City Attorney ,Y i• DEYEIAPER'S SIGNATURES MUST E NOTA°IZED f;> i AND CWLETED IN TRIPLICATE ,r , 7 J CITY OF RAMCNO CIICAMOM6A ENGINEERING DIVISION ENCROACi OT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE For Improvement: OR 86-05 Date: 11-10-80 Compute y: L n a ee File Reference: City Drawing No. -404 MOTE: Does not include current fee for writing persit or pavement deposits QUANTITY UNIT ITFH PRICE AMOUNT 2,496 S.F. 4" P.C.C. sidewalk 1.75 4 368.00 �'t FA_ Street liahts 1000.00 #_ ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 405.00 SUB TOTAL 1,7168 *RESTORATION /DELINEATIOM CASH T.�ff-M - CONTINGENCY COSTS 10% 1T37 DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) FAITHFUL PERFODWiCE BOND (100%) 1� ON — MASENTATION SURETY (CASH) N/A LABOR AND RATERIAL BOND (50%) �— Berna'di otCoun y Code Titles. Chapters 1-5, & cash restoration /deli eattoonn deposit shall to sad: prior to issuance of an Engineering Construction Permit. Revised 3/84 RESOLUTION NO. i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU.9CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AYD IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 86 -05 'r WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on November 18, 1986, by Martin Jaska Incorporated as developer, for the tnorevement of public right- of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generilly located wn the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such Improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 66-05; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and acconpanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said 3 Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, 8: IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same Rre hereby approved and the Mayor is r hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. c { •. ,._6 i A 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 19% UL Lon T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Recommendation to award the Residential Street Rehabilitation, P'nase 11 (Slurry Sea)) to the apparent lowest responsible bidder, Fontana Paving, Incorporated for the amount of $107,886.60 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the Residential Street Rehabilitation, Phase II (Slurry Seal) to the lowest bidder, Fontana Paving Incorporated for the amour: of 'o107,R86.80. Analysis /Background Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on November 19, 1986 for the subject project. Ftmtana Paving, incorporated is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of S10f,886.80 (see attached oid summary). -lie engineer's estimate was 5111,140.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and find them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background inv-istigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid docuQnts. Respectfully submitted, MP:ML:cg Attachments } ■! ■ | ! |d § ■■ @■ m ■ e§�■� 2 !` § !6 sa s | � | ■!R se , §| ]¢ it §| B e 9 ! K■ ® ■ ■s. .■ )k ■il ) §�R k � 6 a e2 B , l A || | 70 i ,1 �r w■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �uGa�q STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Monte Preschor, Public Works Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT- Relesse of Bonds and Notice of Completion The required street improvements for Parcel Map 8800 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is racommedded that City Council acct said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file z Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performacne Bond in the amount of $169,300.00. Analysis /Background Parcel Map 8800 - Located northwest corner of 6th. and Center. Developer: M.O. Keller 9950 E. Baldwin Place El Monte, CA 91734 Release: Faithful Performance Mond (Street $169,300.00 Respectfully submitted, MP:CB:dlw attachments �r -a� ti i RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. Thr undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: PARCEL MAP b800 2. The full name ano address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWAGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 3rd day of December, 1986, there was conpleted on the x, hereinafter described real property the work of iayrovement set forth in the kcontract documents for: l PARCEL MAP 88J0 4. The new of the original contractor for the work of improvenent as 3 whole was: W. G. KELLER 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is Described as follows: PARCEL MAP 8800 The street address of sato ;roperty is N/A •� , CITY 0s,RA4CH0 CUCAMONGA, a �r nunirioal corporation, °Owner 4 y.. Date P au ugeau F , �� Senior Civil Engineer ;:N RESOLUTION NO. V, " 3 L{ I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C0CM4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FUDLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL NAP' 8800 AAD AUTHORIZING THE FILING CF A NOTICE OF COMPLETIN FOR THE WOW: WHERokS, the construction of public inprovements for Parcel Map 8800 have been coaplet!d to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work coMiete. HOW, THEREFOPE. be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion 41th the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. i ,i .K y u 1 (i r NEW: ! i� ! CffY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 TD: rity Council and City Manager FROM: Monte Prescher, Public Works Fngineer BY: Cathy Decker, Public Works Inspector v18JECT' Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECCOMDATION: The required street improvements for CUP 81 -03 have been conpleted in an acceptable manner and it,is recommended that City Councii accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clark to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $72,300. Analysis /8ackground CUP 81 -03 - Located northeast corner cf Archibald Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Developer: David D. Miller and Nub Distributing 9730 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cutamonga, CA 91730 Rel ^ase: Faithful Performance Gone (Street) $72,300 Respectfully submitted, MP:CB:dlw attachments .4 1 J fl � '! 751 L' ,h RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED NAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE I5 HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described reel Property, the nature of which interest or estate a is: CUP 81 -03 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 3rd day of December, 1986, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: CUP 81 -03 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement , > as a whole was: David D. Miller and Hub 01vtributing 5. The real property referred to herein is situated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows CUP 81 -03 The street address of said property is N/A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOY.GA, a municipal corporation, Owner r •' Date au Rougeau • � ,; �� Senior Civil Engineer a 1= , RESOLUTION NO. ft —3 Y3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 81 -03 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE Or COMPLEMN FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public irproverants for CUP 81 -03 have been conpteted to the satisfaction of the City +Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work ccaplete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the wDrk is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file'a Notice of Completion with tha County Recorder of San Bernardino County. _, n .. 11 i ,s :. a4 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Monte Prescher, P,.blic Worka Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public WoAs Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Coapletion The required street isproveeents for Tract 11626 have been crapleted in an acceptable manner and it is recoewded that Cit;, Council ar..:ept said improvewnts, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of "aapletion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $169,380.00. Analysis /Background Tract 11626 - located at Beryl and Almond Developer: John W. Motz, Inc. 5316 E. Chapman /100 Orange, CA 92669 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $663.000 Respectfully submitted, MP:CB:d1N ■ 77 1 t i` RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHFN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca',lfornia 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an Interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate Is: Tract 11626 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAHONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 3rd day of December, 1986, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract docm:onts for: Tract 11626 4. The nano of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: John W. Motz, Inc. S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Tract 11626 - Beryl and Almond The street address of said property is N/A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner ' •4ii> J au ugeau fr yk r /jD Senior Ctv11 Engineer [n E, M) <i RESOLUTION NO. g(, 3 y .3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 11626 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CLgiPLETION FOR THE WORK d WHEREAS, the construction of public- improvements for Tract 11626 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Cocpletion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorised to sign and isle a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino Couniv-. M 4 .as• � y • �[L•'igv -''� a 1 '60 1 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a� STAFF REPORT° ' 0 T f I��- U Z OAT'd � : December 3, 1986 0 197 TO: City Council and City Manager ' FROM: Slane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement for Victoria Basin Study for the Etiwanda Storm Drain Lines 1 -2, 2 -1, 2 -2, 2 -3 with Williamson A Schmid Consulting Civil Engineers RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that the attached Professional Services Agreement with Williamson and Schmid Consulting Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors for the study of Victoria Basin as affected by the construction of the proposed Ettwanda Storm Drain Lines 1 -2, 2 -1, 2 -2, and 2 -3 be approved. The contract amount of $7,300.00 will ba funded by the Drainage Fund from funds budgeted for the Etlwanda Storm Drain Lines 1 -2, 2 -1, 2 -2, and 2 -3. AlA1.YS IS /BAC3(GRO1NND In response to the request of the San Bernardino County flood Control District, an aoalysis is needed of what effect the discharge of the proposed drain lines will have upon the existing Victoria Flood Control Basin. The study will tabulate the natural flows to the basin, the increase of flown to the basin and the discharge capacity and volume of, storage existing at the basin. The firm of 10111amson d Schmld, who is currently preparing the Master Plan of i Drainage for the City 1s recommended to perform the study. Their initial Master Plan Study was the basis• for the storm drain designs performed to date. Respectfully su tted, BWF,ka k;_ I Attachments it f+ +r, - �i.-r.'C4 -'i %iH 1 r.yj PROFESSiQN& SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day t' of 1986, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY ") and Williamson E Scheid Consulting Civil Engineers 8 Land Surveyors (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). A. Recitals. (i CITY has heeetofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of Victoria Basin Drainage Study for connection of the Etiwmnda Storm Drain Lines 1 -2, 2 -1, 2 -2 i 2 -3. ( "Project" hereafter). (ii) CONSUJANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advico and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such processional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as 4 fo11 oars: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: , -1- _ (a) Project The preparation of Victoria Basin Hydrology study showing impact of the proposed connection of Master Plan Brain 1 -2, 2 -1, 2 -2, and 2 -3 to the Victoria Basin described in Exhibit 'A' Scope of Services attached hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, 1 surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, r { of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and ,r attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of r Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be pe-formed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, a surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and € attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the aroJect acceptance for construction is set forth In Exhibit "B' Project Schedule attached hereto. i 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shell forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statutes, regulations, tordlnances and guidelines, all to the reasonable } satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall suppl,, copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as " documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in Project Schedulr, Exhibit "B'. Copies of the documents shall be in such nuabers as are required by Exhibit 'A". CITY is .2- M my thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised 00cuments in such form and in the quantities dotera'ned necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section BZ.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. f (e) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, a, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be :ecessary to comply with the terms c' this Agreement. In the event any such a other persons are retained by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such i persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT furthdr agrees that no subcontractor shall be rotalned by CONSULTANT except upon the odor written approval of CITY. f 3. CITY agrees as follows: i (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $7,300.00 for the a performance of the services required hereunder. This sun shall cover the cost fof ail staff time and all other M sct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment f A to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made In accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'A'. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance A with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable Lima after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges snall be detailed in WWI; 'A' either with ,3 d. respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no ' event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals y�• described in Exhibit 'A'. (c) CONSULTANT agroes that, in no evont, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sue in excess of 951 of the aaxiwm payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of alt final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be Dade not later than 60 days after presentatfo. of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services i requested, in arittng, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Servters as set forth in Exhr' c "A" horeof, shall be paid on a reirburseaent basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C ". Charges for r" additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (o) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other {, information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary to order to complete the project. (c) Stch information as is generally available from CITY files } applicable to the proJact. i (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other " governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Owner ship of Documents ll oocume 4ata, studies, surveys, drawings, nips, models, photographs an. Y torts prepared by CONSULTANT 4 � � C pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be dallvard to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of sold documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the r) CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the speJfic written consent of " the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and ind-vify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses Including defense cost: arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or rouse at another site by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This 'agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at j} CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "C ", on a pro- rate basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the y date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive mare then i, the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shalt provide to F, CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps. models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cau!e. 7. Notices and Designated Neoresentatives: Any and all notices, r* demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall ,''''tip..' . _, . �•. . ,. �l� OiOG� J� w �: = "3ti, be addressed as set forth in this Paragrdph /. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Blanc N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer, for an on behalf of the CITY and Tmv. t Wz%A - for an in behalf of CONSULTANTS. Williamson A Schmid Consulting Civil Engineers A Land Surveyors, 17782 SkyPark Boulevard, Irvine, CA. Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after daposit thereof in the United States mail, pn3tzge prdpald and Oruperly aadressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: C04SVLTART shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in it company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow mny suocentraetor to couoence work on a subcontract until 01 insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at i all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of i insurance: (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before bsginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insuran:e as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may Al employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. r In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code " r Section 3700, every employer shall secure the pyvmont of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to coA*ncSng work, • aii sign and file with CITY "• n. a certification as follows:�,, a� e� rid fx' )A r� i T i r' •4% T . 'I an aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Cede which require every mcployer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before comencing the performance of the work of this Agreement'. (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT snall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, coepreb•nsive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to anyone person or for any one accident o- occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) E -rors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of Insurance concerning errors and omissions ('malpractice') providing protection of at least $250,000 for errors and omissions ('aalprdctice°) with respect to loss ar%,ng from actions of CONSULTVR performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to de business to the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that -7- W2^ (1) the insurer, insured ana all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation ' against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; l �• (2) tie policies are prlma,y and noncontributing with arty insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they canrot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the Insurer to CITY by certified i mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may e L' effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. t g, Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indernify and save 't harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to pe.sons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of arty and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, to any manner arising cut of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance o: this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted oy law. 10. Assig. it: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, Y ( by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that , CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. i`1 12. 6overntng Law• This Agreement shall bo governed by aid :I f' construed in Accordance with the Taws of the State of California. 1' W Y.✓ r , y } �yli Y• , y, r f - r -�rFy r ;;y.;�ay ; _ «.vr k- 13. Attorney's Fees; in the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees ., and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. � f 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other 3}; agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. , Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or prorise not contained in this agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be ffective only it it is in writing signed by all parties. y IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties heruto have executed this Agreement as of the Jay and year first set forth above: C NSA 'CANT Nordxr 70. 1986 TM V. aaonaoU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA mayor _ ATTEST: —evB erTy F.—Vu e e , City clerk Approved ar ro form: t .f 1� i Mr EXHIBIT "A" SLOPE OF WORK AND FEE PROPOSAL I Drainage studies. Hydrology o Determine the "existing condition' inflow and outfl ow from the existing victoria Basin $2,450.00 o Determirwi the 'ultimate condition" inflow and outflow from the existing basin (no basin improvements or alternates to be included) 1,600.00 o Approximate the Mood impact of Task 2 1,400.00 o Summary report 350.00 2. Meetings. Attend greetings with client, other design disciplines, and conractors, as required by project. 1,500.00 TOTAL $7,300.00 Based upon what you have told me about the project, it is sa best estimate that our fees and costs will not exceed 7,300.00. As we have discussed, these services will be provided on a time and material basis pursuant to our standard hourly rate schedule in effect at the time the work is performed (current copy enclosed, possible revisions effective August 1, 1987). }'. 70 µ`{1y1 t r `f si,r .1 �.• 4i. " .efp fi d EXHIBIT 'B' PRQIECT SCHEDULE J Agreement Executed by City Council December 3, 1986 Project reportings to be complete within 60 calendar lays of Notice to Proceed Notice to Proceed December 6, 1986 Report to City February 6, 1987 -11- �s e c 1 .. r� t� ,4 r Y f., f' v �1^ i t P �r EXHIBIT "Co STANDARD HOURLY RATES EFFECTIVE AUGUST 4, 1986 AUTHDRIZED OVERTIME PRINCIPAL ENGINEER $100 $100 PROJECT MANAGER 86 86 PROJECT ENGINEER /PLANNER 72 72 ENGINEER /TECH 5 58 X49 69 ENGINEER/TECH 4 59 ENGINEERITECH 3 39 47" TECH 2 /WORO PROCESSING 30 37 TECH I/TRAINEC 20 26 3 -MAN SURVEY CREW 162 196 2 -MAN SURVEY CREW 124 IE0 ADDITIONAL CHARGE COMPUTER PROCESSING TIME $ 25 /HOUR PLOTTER TINE $ 10 /MIMPJTE EXPERT WITNESS $100 /H6UR COURT APPEARAPCES /DEPOSITIONS $100/HOUR MESSENGER $ 30 /HOUR IH -HOUSE BLUEPRINTS AND XEROX AT COST OUTSIDE SERVICES AND BLUE PRINTING AT COST PLUS 10 PERCENT -12- y� A6z a , S i t C Y d RESOLUTION NO. % —.3 y y A RESDLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR BASIN STUDY TO BE PERFDRMFD FOR THE VICTORIA STOR:a BRAIN BASIN SHOWING THE EFFECTS OF DISCHARGE FROM THE PRCPOSED ETIWANDA STORM DRAIN LINES 1 -2, 2 -1, 2 -2, AND 2 -3 WITH WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEIDRS WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to have prepared a Basin Study prepared of the VtcBoria Basin reflecting the 'effects of discharging storm water flows to oatd basin from the Master Plan Stara Drain Lines 1 -2, 2 -1, 2 -2, and 2 -3 for Ec'wanda. WHEREAS. Williamson i Schaid Consulting Civil ,Engineers and Land Surveyors, response to a request for proposal desires to 'perform professional services to the City for the preparation of said Basin Study for a fee not to exceed $7,300.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ralifornta to: (i) Approve, accept and execute a Professional Services Agreement betwran the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Williamson d Schmid Consul tiup.Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors. (it) The Mayor for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to sign said agreeNent on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the City Clerk attesting thereto. (iii) The City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to forward the executed agreeeents to the consultant and direct the work to proceed. - 93 :R �4 "�j�� w a i' i S 1� r w• Y' DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �r .'MQ� N it A _i December 3, 1986 19" City Council and City Manager Blane N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 for the Development of a I Pavement Management System for Local Streets and Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Inventory for the additional fee of $4,940.00 RF.COMMFIDATId1: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Contract Change Order No. 1 for 19 additional dual lane mites for the Pavement Management System - Local Streets and Curbs, Gutter and Sidewalk Inventory by Carter Associates, Inc. for the additional fee of $4,940.00. ANALTSIS/EACKGRNW Findings resulting from the recently completed inventory reveal that the actual quantities of work are in excess of the 3J0 dual lane miles originally contracted In the agreements dated March 21, 1986 and August 21, 1986. A provision was included in the original contract stipulating that, in the event additional mileage was encountered, it would be invoiced at the rate of $175.00 per dual lane mile for pavements end $85.00 per dual lane mile for curb, gutter and sidewalke. The recently cempleted inventory revealed a total of 19 additional dual lane miles. These 19 additional dual lane miles are in addition to the Professional Services Agreement award to Carter Associates, Inc, of San Diego, California on August 21, 1986 for Pavement Managemcnt Systems of local streets and -urb, gutter and sidewalk inventory. The Contract Change Order increases .he contract price by $4,940.00. The contract fee, therefore, will increase from $38,350.00 to $43.290.00 and will be paid by Qs Tax Funds. Respectfully submitted, F H:kojV—� Attachments /� i CITY OF RANCHO CtrjWONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER r er o.: Pavement Management System - Local Streets Oacember 3 1986 and Curb. Gutter d Sidewaik Inventory a e: C.O. 86 -93 Account No. 11 -4638 -8111 TO: Carter b Associates Inc. 7675 Da t St. /350 San Diego, CA 92111 ng neer You are hereby requested to comPiy with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services I. Pavement Management System 19 additional dual lane miles 8 $175.00 per dual lane ntle in Contract Price In Contract Price $3,325.00 2. Curb, Gutter and Sidwalk Inventory 51,615.00 19 additional dual lane miles 0 $85.00 per dual lane mile TOTAL $4.940.60 Mi il icATW The amount of the Contract will be (Fjetj$fJo) (Increased) by the su. of: Four Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars ($4,940.00 The Contract Total including this and Previous Change Orders wilt be: Forty-Three Thousand Two Hundred Minty Dollars 4 43.eru.DD —�- The Contract perioe provided for completion will be (Unchanged) 0 Days This efxument will become a supplement to the Contract and ail provisions will apply hereto. Requested:,( ng Sr.tr�iaay �� Zf�96 C} a z . Accepfyd. i /1 -zc -ac engineer a Approved: or, o enc o ucasonga 21. 1986 -- - — .. °..'"' ... .... K.y,nm� enlinem 9s -� z a. i� ti i• C =. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 —0 agrr TO: City Council and City Manager rROM: Blane W. Frandsen. Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Engineering Services Contract Change Order No. l (C.O. 85 -122) for Hermosa Avenue Widening and Hamilton Street Extension with L.A. Wainscott A Associates, Inc, in the amount of $3;208.59. bunging the contract amount to $36,952.59 to be paid from Systems Development Fund It is recommended that the attached Engineering Service 6entract Change Order No. 3 for Hermosa Avenue Widening and Hamilton Street Extension with L.A. Wainscott,A Associates, Inc. in the amount of $3,208.59 be ,approved. This brings the total contract amount to $36,952.59. A W.TSIS/BACKBROW: During the course of processing the final parcel 'amp for this project establishing the 19th Street right - of -wary east of Hermosa Avenue, a tentative tract rasp was submitted for the north side improvements. A comparison of the two maps indicated differences in the basic bearing and centerline references for the improvements being proposed by the two projects. An alignment study showing existing improvements and the required coordination effort to bring the 19th Street improvements of this subject projuct into syneronization with those across the street and tying both workings together with existing improvements to the east of the current workings. Both project imrovement plans and Parcel Map 9986 have been revised because of the aligr;:.at study. Item f3 of the Change Order reflects an in- construction design evaluation to adjust wall heights of the west side retaining walls to match grade differences noted in the field. The subject,project presently fir construction Is funded from Systems Development Funds. Respectfully fitted, Attachments CITY OF RAVA CUCANOWA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CUNTRACT FOR-- Order o.: HERMOSA AVENUE WIDENING 11 -17 -86 HAMILTON AVENUE EMNSION '-6e TO: L. A. WAIHSCO'rr 3 ASSOCIATES INC. n9 neer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes fron the agreement for engineering services. c- in Contract Price in Contract Price 1. Revise 19th Street Alignment & Parcel Map $1,100.00 2. Perform Alignment Study for 19th Street (Hermosa to Cartilla) 2,008,59 3. Perform Structural Calculations for adding block height to Hermosa Retaining Walls. 100.00 TOTAL $3,208.59 Items 1 and 2 to coordinate 19th Street Improvements with Proposed Tract No. 13342 Item 3 add to retaining wall height along Hermosa Avenue Improvements The amount of the Contract wilt be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sum of:Three Thousand Two Hundred Eight and Fifty Mine /100 Dollars ($3,208.59 The Co •ct Total lncludlnyy this and previous Change Orders will be•Thirt Six Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Two and Fifty Nine /100 Dollars ($36.95 The Contract period provided for completion will be (Increased)(Decreased) (Unchanged) Days This document will become a sup lenient to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: ajLltd pE3ia.7T / /- /i -JE• the raanndssen, en or �v ng neer ate Accepted: J /Af manfmGG/' L /� /,-gf Engineer ��{e Approved: Mayor. CiV Of anc o ucamonga Date "ayreament dmtod:5 December 1985 ( -� -7- tiv. L A WAI OTT & ASSOCIATES, IN % �� �' V � 7 C LEI ,�,6/I I CML .1AMSURMOAS- ARVVECTS juJV,4 CONSTRU009MATMALSMSULTANL NOV I7 M6 F � y tt'K•wuwSteTr PG ,� xvF, ouvaow. u "RO W W ; P e UwneBNAV/ - AMELLESw .PG k November 12, 1986 we 282.24F Blaine Frandsen, Senior Engineer �r City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SuSject: Hermosa Avenue Widening and Hamilton Avenue Extension Dear Blaine: The attached invoice no. 852 (11.0.1282.24) is to cove- extra open -ended work you verbally authorized us to perform on the subject project. This work is over and -• above the previously authorized budget of $33,744.00. Our Sill for $3208.59 for extra work can be broken down as follows: 1. Revise 19th Street improvements and Parcel Flap 9986 to be compatible with proposed TR 13342 at the northeast corner of Hermosa and 19th Street (including meeting with City and Dan Guerra) - $1,100.00. 2. Perform alignment study of 19th Street between Hermosa and Cartilla (including 4 hours. of field survey hours) - $2.008.59. 3. Perform structural calculations to see if two extra block coarses could be added to standard retaining wall - $100.00, Payment of this invoice will bring the total billed for this project to $36,952.59 ($3,208.59 over the previously authorized amount), - Please call if you have any questions. Z S :Am4r ly. Russ Sharp ;T Manager, Public Works Engineering .,r• %f RS: jal F, J 70 22AWEARTONROAD SUITE200 GRANOTEPAACE CALIFORNIA92324 17141824.1 ". X pn 41,a Wr[IVA[F OPl1aG; illta MipaaN(AVG rirten oau,o>'L.nAACF ewroawu xn4 ma u4nm .• � N � i•:r75•i�i• �;..it. .4 1 �4 +1 �_ 'i "x;.1`r` =, t I E• ) „ c RESOLUTION NO. p Cp '-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH L. A. XAIY.SCOTT 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR HERMOSA AVENUE WIDENING AND HAMILTON STREET EXTENSION ' WHEREAS, The City of 'Rancho Cucamonga. California finds it nice;,sary _ to amend or change 'Contract Order 085 -122" for Professional Service Agreement with L.A. Wainscott A Associates, Inc.. for Hermosa Avenue Widening and Hamilton Street Extension by issuing Engineering Contract Change Order No. 3; and WHEREAS, L.A. Wainscott A Associates, Inc, desires to perform such " work as included in the subject Engineering Contract Change Order No: -3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: 1 En, veering Contract. Change Order No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with L.A. Wainscott A Associates, Inc. be ar ?roved. 2 The Mayor is authorized to sign said document on behalf of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3 Billirgs issued for such workings be received by the City and payment made in the amount of the noted change order. i ,Y 0- �� •,°``�t« - 'ry -!Ct H�C�Y4a�'i:?;r,;,�i�.::,^s'. t`v' .>. -•.x. Cep +.s4�i�Vt � .. is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C t,CA4D11 STAFFFPO�iT a DATE: December 3, 1986 a Z TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Rathindra (Shintu) Bose, Senior Civil Engineer ' BY: Varian Vartanians, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of an indenture between Southern Pacific ' Transportation Company and tha City for construction of r. grade crossing at Milliken Avenue northerly of Baseline Road; and approval of a related agreement between R. C. Land Company, Williaci Lyon Company, and the City RECONUDAT + It 1s recommeided that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Indenture between the City and the 'Southern Pacific Transportation Company W authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same. In addition, it it recommended that the City Council adopt the = attached agreement betwtan the City and William Lyon and R. C. Land Companies and authorize tue Mayor and the City Clerk io sign same. BACKGROUND The Southern Pacific Transportation Company has issued the attached indenture to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of a new grade crossing at Milliken Avenue northerly of Baseline Road. Construction of the above grade crossing was mide 3 condition of approval of Tract No. 13022, located westerly of Milliken Avenue, between Baseline Road and Highland Avenue. Work is to be perfoiimd by Southern Pacific ` Transportation Company, the expenses incurred being reimbursed from a deposit placed with the City by the oaveloper. William Lyon and R. C. Land Companies, the developers of the subject tract, have further submitted an agreement (attachoi' for approval), to fulfill the construction requirements as stipulated in said indenture. Respectfully submitted, RSB :VV:cg 4 166 _ Vii::; -� vk;. \r: . ,,'lam v I'..- , ,v.1' ?, - �.e . _ 'n.. - -q`ti i9• t r r � 1 - • �Il 1 °iy G4N AIS� •�d i ..�.re nfir•r Zo 77 1 i. AS 1.11'L RR ' y1I,L , � 1 I •/ llpl � M�tLI neI >fR „e W w •�I� i J_ _ 1 ••• FaOTAU. L 8UZ; _ t� CiTY OF RANCHC CUCAMONCA d% title* A ' ENGINEERING DIVISION s ` �8°SSiNc VICINITY MAP l : PAte „..:•tom, J AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS This Agreement In made and entered into this •�; day of , 1986, by and between the CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred ' to a., ' "CITY ") and R C LAND ^.OMPANY, a California general partnership, , • and the WILLIAM LYON COMPANY, a California corporation (herein- after collectively refercod to as 'DEVELOPER ") for the installa- tion of certain improvements with respect to a grade separation crossing located at Milliken Avenue and the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's Grapeland Branch in the City of Rancho Cucamonga A. Recitals. (1) CITY proposes to enter into an agreement wi.:h •• the SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORATION COMPANY (hereinafter sometimes „ referred to as "RAILROAD ") for the construction and maintsnasce of a grade crossing at Milliken Avenue and the RAILROAD's Grapo- land Branch, BBO- 529.g. Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is a form of indenture for easement rights between CIPY and RAILROAD regarding said grade crossing. (Si) DEVELOPER desires that said grade crossing be constructed since tie came will improve accob: to and enhance the value of Certain of DEVELOPER's properties in the :TT° !111) CITY is willing to enter into the indenture with r RAILROAD only if DEVELOPER. agrees to pay all costs of constructing :. the crossing and agrees, in all respects, to assume and perform. , t h i 4P i` 1, y• , the otligations of CITY under the indenture, with the exception of maintenance requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and DEVELOPER as follows: 1. Upo:, execution hereof by all partiee, CITY agrees to execute and deliver to RAILROAD the indenture, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A ". 2. DEVELOPER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, CITY's actual coats incurred in the construction of the grade crossing as act forth in the indenture. The parties heroto agree that the present estimated cost of said construction is one Hundred Fifty -Five Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($1551100.00). T J. DEVELOPER shall, within fifteen (15) days of execu- tion of this Agreement by DEVELOPER, deposit with CITY the sum of One Hundred Fifty -five Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($155,100.00). 4. Upon completion of the grade crossing project by the RA[LROAD, CITY shall cause a final accounting to be prepared and presented to DEVELOPER. Said final accounting shall specify the final, actual coats of construction of the grade crossing. In the event that the amount theretofor, deposited by DEVELOPER in accordance with this Agreement exceeds the actual costs of construction of the grade croasing, CITY shall include with the final accounting presented to DEVELOPER its warrant in such amount so as to cause DEVELOPER to have borne the actual costs of con- structLon of the grade crossinq. In the event teat the amount. ✓• f• n. i theretofore deposited with CITY by DEVELOPER is Leta than the actual costa of construction of the grade crossing e� s said fin"' accounting, said presents shown In to DEVELOPER Lion of the final � ohall include a statement Indicating atement or lnvolcO 4 the amount to DEVELOPER s necessary be paid b cause be to have y DEVELOPER +. borne the actual so as to the grade crossing, ost of construction of 4. Sgld amount y by DEVELOPER, shall OPER be due and Payable to CITY, A . and egch oP them so maSlir within thirty (30) days of CITY 4 said final accounting and statement 3 the event oDEVELObpo due and of them, toile to Pay to CITY the amou. thirty d owing by the final account" Within legal rate, days, then Interest shall accrue thereon at the maximum This Agreement .+ in accordance ith the laws Of be governed by and construed f the State of s` 6 In t California• enforce any term or provision any of legal Proceeding is instituted to �E Party In Said legal proceedln this Agreement, the prevailing attorneys, fees and g shall be entitled to recover coats from the Other mined by the Court to b Party in an am e zeeaonaDle. out:t deter_ Of This any heirs mast is binding the heneflt upon and shall inure to or ass! executors, administrators, successors `- ' qne, executors, the context reguires or admits. -� B• This Agreement n' eupsrsedea mental whether oral any and all Other or In omit. r et the agree- -. reepeOt to the subject matter hereof. lEach Party tosthis Agreement +, �r tr s -3 1A f'. fl , ATTE i d, /ate S ' acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied horein nor any other agreament, statement or promise i' �y not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is S vr' in a writing signed by all of tho parties hereto.• • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first not forth above. CITY OY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, i +• a municipal corporation Hy Mayor' f ATTESTt a1 City Clark R C LAND COMPANY, at California fl , ATTE i d, /ate Y- 331.9�x(8j STREET OR HjaHWAY a „u �hG �ttLt �= EMEtVT t(ditt, OSO t �Fitc PI r/ spon,4TI08 Clay cl?r OF ABy, [ 11 yr, of Cnllto' -ek, �CSO CIt rGl. aOdrew , c1tY 811, A"04o 1CUe�rPOzitioq of the 34t - W 4 C /11 or 1� I. Thu °Ydpzb dle�^'ey'mK' W m r; � w pl w'Yumr"I W. .n.0 w "'e p °�l wa : d[r�. .w„ W w wr my” m. ,a,e ei[e.0 u nc v D...v o" " �'M % we "� �, rt', n,� a -W m eq 6°'°a .1 � h w m fin.CV[u h ht" _ 774 p,V ` ^uWd'� '4O1jM � pWWv me�m" trams r�xrnren arft ar'btiW.n,� YUw.U'y � ur tt rk ft fY'.„ ^Y. b .u' w ^d+M, b ft n. M atl`y . to ^e. TY N.1[ L%ryd Tom 'W(U.u, m a MIh. e.�'i.'Y a y 'tl Y U' o°nnMbn a �YW u . .... wizz M. Ar4",e.8YM,r. .eny q�ibmna~Wyba U"q�Ua��gw v °:. ft�c ro mn .h,N u 7 MEu pq '�+[� uo W m tb h� 1, b Um rte.. [..d A[en 'h,.pw wmY,. n„,q, .� .,.bW tl u Uu1l[ro. q^ ^[afY hj[e0n.'Y" 014 e,u Uy men d "Mod r"Ct a„tee �4d uu',w°n°ytl41n U,.we°..e py�yv .vt"Ih.. w V.ru ;r RLI- P. As ^COm,w,YUr,1on, a1j hew Nauya�uYn a[ny b fir, RUY4 mt b 4,W�wYrce U�[°^IUi of nb UWA ''r'°�^m'.,tl `i'nuftwwrim aka,'!.°.' 'N d,W„!1 ' 0�w G�` b��� eu,,,,hyA 'U„ b„l _w mYw a3ien, -'- ° !°W u aar e..:•u. m n[h. �R °.r w w....r_. �qn mvuu t, of 3thls SaV4b 12 tor" r„u-Yn .r . ^ � 9y d. � N � r(1 -W'C q�� M = ^i�,�4u1r. I+rlurl,s. ["N. r4 u N al the At a7 IN u 1m ry,t M1CYIVF. w Dwe hw.e t[tlrd Lyory [`° h-1-Y mlo Pert. soGTrr ""'° CORD P'�IFIC TpA,ySDOrtTATI08 Ue,r Dn„m u b °,e.4d Io dpypt. u d N, 14I ud SY CITY f t !) OF MSC80 COCAMOBOA, t Attl/r, By A[111t1oy tar y Slcra By i,.. �� mayor 1E S E E T Milliken Avenae Crossing B -524.9 City of Rancho Cucamonga 12. Railroad shall furnish all necessary labor, materials, tools o-i and equipment and shall perform the following work; (a) install four (4) flashing light grade crossing signals 9 saryp actuating aand moperating circuitagandeadequateeces- Snstrumont housing, hereinafter collectively referred to as "signals," at said highway. Said signals shall be located approximately as shown on the print of Railroad'o Drawi;.g 86892, Sheet No. 1, dated Decea)%:r 1, 1983, attached and made a part hereof. Installation of and ' all materials for said signals shall be in accordance with Railroad's usual standardsi (b) prepare track, including any necessary rail and tie renewal] (c) install geotextile fabric and drain fipoj and (d) install one hundred four (104) feet of rubber pad cro3sinq surface. Grantee agrees to reimburse Railroad for one hundred percent (100%) of the cost and oxpenae incurred by Railroad in furnishing materials and Performing the work specified in this Section 12. 13. Following execution of this instrument, Railroad will order the delivery of all materials required to perform the work contemplated herein and shall submit to Grantee a bill for eighty percent (80%) of Grantee's share of the estimated cost of materials to be furnished by Railroad. As noon an the crossing signals and /or the crossing surface have been placed in operation, Railroad shall submit to Grantee bills for eighty percent (801) of Grantee's share cf the estimated cost of applicable labor furnished by Railroad. Following completion of audit, Railroad shall submit to Grantee a final bill for the actual total cost of the work performed by Railroad, loss the progress payments made by Grantee hereunder. Grantee shall pay all of such bills promptly. I° In the event progress payments made by Grantee exceed the audited total final cost, the difference shall be promptly refunded to Grantee by Railroad. 14. The work to be performed by Railroad hereunder shall be com- menced as soon as labor and materiale ::d avaiiahle, following execution of this instrument, and shall be completed within one (1) year thereafter. ' :�'' Page 1 of Insert ja- li. After installation of said signals has been completed, _ road shall maintain same so long as they they in place. Cost of be apportioned between the parties here - 6 maintaining said signalo shall to in accordance with Sections 1202.2 and 1231.1 of the California + - Public Utilities Code. The precise manner and method of determining , other applicable charges, manner and method of payment and procedures, be by any applicable decisions of under naid sections shall governed Public Utilities Commission. the California . 16. The parties intend that the promises and obligations of this indenture shall constitute covenants running with the land so as to and assigns. ' bind and benefit their respective successors P' y) +rt e 4 ,4 fe t � 1 •'Y •11. �'� � Page 2 of _ pInsert �o EXHIBIT •A• Those certain pareela of land situated in the c,ty of,Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1 The Nest 60.00 feat of Section 31, Township 1 North, Range 6 Nest, of the San Bernardino Maridiat., according to an Official Plat filed in the District Land Office, lying within tho land described In dead& to Pacific Electric Railway Company recorded June 28, 1913, in Book 523, Page 276 of Deeds and recorded April 22, 1913, in Book 527, Page 314, of Deeds, Records of said County. Parcel 2 The cast 60.00 toot of Section 36, Township 1 North, Rangy 7 Nest, of the San Bernardino Beridian, according l•o an official Plat Mod In the District Land Office, lying within tha land described In deed to Pacific Electric Railway Company recorded April 22, 1913, in Book 527, Page 333 of Deads, Records of &&id County. N 1 all 1�.�5 I -Page 1 of 1- 109 t L i a� �E @y . }V vY I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITI COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ,CUCAMONGA APPROIING _AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRNiSPORTATION COMPANY FOR CONSTRUCTIOH'OF A GRADE CROSSING AT MILLIKEN AVENUE NORTH OF BASELINE ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucaaanga has for its consideration an agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company; and WIIEREAS, the agreement provides for installation of a grade crossing across said railway for Milliken Avenue north of Baseline; and; WHEREAS, the City hereby considers' said crossing installation essential to an orderly development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said agreement be and the same Is herehy approved and the Mayor is authorized to sign same on behalf of the City and the City Clerk to attest thereto [ ( lJ 0 � s r; C 4` f- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE. W..eeber 3, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the C1 until FROM: Brad Buller, City Plenne BY: Dan Coleman, Seni.,r Planner SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF STREET NMiIMG PROCEDURES FOR CONSIDERA710M IN On Noveaber 19, 1986, the City Council directed staff to preptre a Resolution of intent of the City Council to unify the street noes of Hermosa Avenue and Turner; Avenue under the singular name of Hermosa Avenue. In addition, the City Council ruquested that staff research the historical significance of these two street names. Attached for your adoption is a Resolution of Intent. A staff report regarding the history of Hemosa Avenue and Turner Avenue will be forwarded to the City Council under separate cover prior to tiw; meeting. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC:ns F 21 t. i1 r. F RESOLUTION NO. FL -3517 r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO b' CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENT TO UNIFY THE STREET NAMES OF HERMOSA AYE'A'JE AND TURNER AVENUE UNDER THE SINGULAR NAME OF HERMOSA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council finds it desirable to unify Hermosa/Turner uncer a singular name; and WHEREAS, the unification would provide a singular name for a ,y continuous street consistent with the street nuing policies; and e WHEREAS, a singular nave would promote uniformity and avoid confusion to the public; and W WHEREAS, the name 'Hermosa' has historical significance to the area. NON, THEREFOrE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: 1, That pursuant to Municipal Code Section 12.12.610 that the City Council hereby declares its intent to initiate a change of street names to unify Hermosa Avenue and Turner Avenue under 'the signular name of Hermosa Avenue. 2. That a certified copy of this Resolution and rela..4 material hereby adopted by the City Council shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission. I i �f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT 9!.18: December J, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council 1977 PROM: Lauren M. Wssserman, City Manager VV ��� �TERAMCB SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO UPGRADE TWO VACA9 IT MAN WORKER POSITIONS TO SENIOR MAINTERANCE WORKER POSITIONS WHICR WOULD PROVIDE A PROPER LaVEL OF SUPRRVISION WITHIN THE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM RECOMMgRDATTON Approval to upgrade two vacant Msintosanco Worker positions to Senior Maintenance Worker positions which would provide a proper level of supervision within the Maintenance Program. Ap CKCROUND The 1986 -87 Budget autboriaed five (S) Senior Maintenance Worker positions and nineteen (19) Maintenance Worker positions. At this time, we are requesting two (2) of the `Jaiatensoee Worker positions be upgraded to Senior Maintenance Workers. Twelve (12) of these rventy -tour (24) positions are presently vacant, and we are in the recruiting process. These staff allocations were developed acme time ego, and as ibe Maintenance Program began to swing into action, it was found the organisational structure needed fine tuning. The original staffing proposal would have provided inconsistent supervision levels. In one ease, a single senior Maintenance Worker would have been supervising twelve (12) Maintenance Workers assigned to two (2) opposite aides of the City. The current proposal would scale down tts span of supervision and provida for a more cost efficient program. This program adjustment would not have an adverse impact on the budget. The Added costs for the ..o (2) upgraded positions would amount to 81,776.00 for the remainder of the fiscal year, however, with the twelve (12) positions being vacant since July 1, 1986, there has been a substantial salary savingo of approximately $84,840.00. Respectfully submitted, Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager Lhii /kep CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA % STAFF REPORT 19 DATE: December 3, 1986 T0: City Council and City Yansger • TRON: Jim Esrt, Administrative Urvices Dlrectw. Wendy A. Nispagel, pu:cbasiag Assistant 80DJ1tCT: f�j:ARGIRG N4INTOAwCR CO}RRACi i «r IRCINOIITMMS:7�i Approval to award WANG equipment mainteaanea contract to 800thern Date Systems, for the remainder of the fiscal year, at a cost of $6,890.45. Rsekarousd: In an attempt to alleviate the problems "used by the continuing increase in repair time by WANG Laboratories and to take advantage of possible cost ;i savings, staff has obtained prices from a qualified slteroativs source for maintenance and service for the WANG computer equipment. ? Staff has checked nine references provided by Southern Data Systems. All nine references have changed from WANG maintenance contracts to SDS coa- t tracts. Reasons stated included: faster response tire, larger part in- ventary, and availability of loaners when equipment "neat be repaired in one day. v' lbe change would result in a cost savings of 41,481.55 for t" City of Rancho Cuctmoogs for fiscal year 1986/81. Respectfully submitted, 1 e i Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:WY:cv Ii11 . t ✓L i Rim 1`1+��•!. W- 1 4..'t 1 //C/ 4 0 R6� v_Jj y!Wj *WABG will charge • oivima of 0432 installation !aa to pat Chase itw on contract., lG **Price includes filter change at 6 aovth iutsrvals. *** Price lecludac filter change at 3 South internals and complete processor cleantvg At B South intervals. ., x detvica for WASG Pqulpntat Price CernAefsgQ go ant • E2L12A 192io. Denerineioo WANG No. YANG Bit, W-Re, RDS vx .. aI 2200 -3A Phoenix DPD 80.4 Nag **4240.00 $16H1.00 ***$183.60 $1265.20 *1 MVFIA4 CPO -256K cemory $294.08 $2058.00 SM.95 $1707.65 4 HIS 4 -port carnival processor $10.00 $ 290.00 49.00 $252.00 17 2336 Workstations 87!.00 41911.00 019.00 $1596M - 1 2290M0E Dist Btsrmvz 610.09 0 140.00 417.9.1 $ 119.00 2 22CSO Diet 1011 Controller $6.00 $ 84.00 $5.00 $ 70.00 2 22CO2 Printer covtroar $4.00 4 56.00 $3.00 $ 42.00 1 1227E Communications Coat. 917.09 $ 119.00 $15.00 0 103.00 I PC WANG PC $51.00 $ 151.00 $42.30 9 297.50 r I LVPC -(,4f 2561, lub.DSKT $23600 01666.00. 4202:10 01.416.10 7 MOSSY SITINDZD TOTALS ...... .................. $8372.00 $6890.45 Installation Pee 432.00 Xerox Total 48804.00 *WABG will charge • oivima of 0432 installation !aa to pat Chase itw on contract., lG **Price includes filter change at 6 aovth iutsrvals. *** Price lecludac filter change at 3 South internals and complete processor cleantvg At B South intervals. ., x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0,N GA STAFF REPORT Detg: Daceahex 6a6 TO: City Cooacil and City PiCNS h lis natrr Jim Wart.- Adninietrative Serrice, Uireetor SUBJECT: F UZM w M�ATIDr d,c,=el rare ar d b iceept the rr 85 -86 City Asdi[ •n document prepared hr indersndant audi:ora, lance, dell andPSnnjyard. Ncke the Cih', Amoal Wit ror rr 65_95 has beau rnceived Ant r erlesre staff. It it nom fo_earded to Council for Your r,celpt Soo acct m1 audit does not mention n9 Problem • Ptan arw needing Couneil'a anent: 6eeeeppeectful /ly s�ubmitte�d, lfn Wart Adminiatrotive genic,, Director JW:co I F r �a Y ��{)a v r:.. DAT7: TO: FROM SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 3, 1986 City Council and City Manager Jim Hart. Administrative services Director MDOIIICATIDNe To IF�rRINC AND prLDINC ARD RAYRTe SPACR LOCA76D AT 9.i egLIN�ROAD Co=ct: authors,, erpanditwa of $15,000 for remodeling of the Engineering and Building and Safety apace, located at 9340 Bsaelite Road, installation from the General A.,d uoalIuated reservemtotthe Cly appropriate cilitieshBuildi g Improvement acrount, and autho:iae the City Manager to sign the necessary documents. Bsrkaronnd Council author;xed lease of two bays at 9360 gasoline Doad (the %,,eke building at the City Hall aitc) when tLey uta-Vettedly became avoilrble. The remodel of those am bay& has been ecfpleted, and staff will be relocating in early December (986. With the movig of the staff (Bu :l:iug Inspectors) to the am bays, the current spate occupied by the BrSld£g inaP+ctr•eoas is available to Allow for needed expansion of the Eugiseeritg functi. To dectmplish this expansion for rngineering, r,,. =inor modifiatioa3 ,cod to be made regarding location of wells and storage bite along with the addition of needed telephone equipment. Staff received bids from Jon C. To=g Contractors end Vsyte Mueller Coaebvation to complete the work. The low bid was from Wayne Mueller. Funds are available in the Fr 86 -87 Budget Reserve. General Fund Unallocated Respectfully snhaitted, Jim Hart Administrative services Director J8rev //7 rr t CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1424 a. ._ •.� DATE: December 3, 1966 TO: City Council and City !tanager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SOEJEt"T= ?O[CEASS Oy Rg211 Op E11X ATgg. AtD Tle KUJB gL 1 1„]10M IaTLlM 7110aXTO N :xr AR ?AU WNTH OgE .�.,C gANC3 AIM OTELTIO— � Conncil authorize purchase tf so 0DI weed sprayer, not to exceed 46,300, and purchase of trench Platte tot to exceed 93,300, and cutborize closing of internal trust fund (70) And allocate the trust (undo to Street and Park Watenance, Maintensucu And Operations AceouaL (01 -4647- 3900). 0everal times ducieg the year, City crews are diopatcbod to co,ceet hrzerdous conditions or to inrtall and replace $cop signs, signal lights, *cc., that are the result of non -City activities. Whenever possible, the City recovers the cost associated with these repair activities by billing the party responsible for the damage. Several wears ago, a special cruet fund was established to receive Any reimbursovents received for these repair activities. Thu foods in the Lnec were allowed to accuwulate with no expenditures befog made from the trout fond. lecentll, in re- evaluating the trust food, staff conclude! the City's general t.ad and special funds would be sore reflective of actual costs to perform CL•y services if reiubursed Sands were credited to the account tLey were expanded from, rather than being put In a trust fund. (Shia wq, if $2,900 is recovered, the account charged sbws a net effect of tare iucreuu in the expenditures over what normal City cperstiuns would cherge.) II 0 Bete is carreatly led against y 847,0oo in the e1poadi toter echedaled rpiaat tIn reviewing nai the food. rest fund and 330 badje taes d needed �but ateaaaee badgee t sdf[e allocation q f two Item funds been ad I• e yr 86_87 YeAn °Pray rar �s Sprayer Would e sot a park land to be 2• Ls sPproriutel7 84,300.00d sprayer. The ooyficlent. prl8ia of the • y,r failure — Currently. if road eo or Put ishirl �aa asphalt inotkaiholeeta road' r: Krl cei�ctaf! wart P hig rortheil The ad ,deMadY andthafstyj, til plate, eter s, and plater L]at Pateh, o • uoae = hol cooride e Cpl tw;a &P fateYtarh� hi70oito ePaaerorer.y Shed of tb Staff fa PProzi and treache9aeatiat Council to authorise •uthori,e tray ae' alloca to the negre, �e Purchase Park Neiateoar fer of the rss■loi n food, fr of the reed aPrayer aota,etl411y b eae Cd ended l Pandd• fInd y�j. srf fund, o t the g e treat �y Respectfully Ilb itt,d, end Mainfatratire 8enicea DLzeetar in:cr / C r r P' 1: C_-rrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager �-Q FROM: Mark R. Lorimer. Adelvietrative Analyst '" , SUBJECT: ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT NODIFICATIONB IWANDC00ATiOW It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached animal control agreement with the County of Ban Bernardino, and anthorise the Nayor to sign and execute the contract which modifies the existing level .f service allowing for a full tine Animal Control Officer deaigoatrd for the City at a cost of 026,300. The City Council authorised 930,000 in the FT 1906 -87 budget for increased animal control services. Jackxrmad The City of Rancho Cucamonga has contracted with the County of San Bernardino to provide animal control services since the City's incorporation. With the tremendous growth and increasing population within lho community, staff requested the County to provide various options for tacreasiag the level of service to meet these growth and population demands. The current level of animal control service provided to the City of gaucho Cucamonga includes all personnel, equipment and $applies necessary to provide for animal control services. The County prov ides an equivalent of 1.75 full time anlmsl control officers with which to patrol and respond to calls for service. Additionally, the County provides an Animal Licensing Checker to implement the dog licensing progra. Be" Ices which are provided to the City includet 1. Enforcement of all County Ordinances pertaining to animals and issuance of ei tations as necessary for violations of those Ordinances. 2. Impounding all animals caught at large. 3. Quarantine all animals suspected to be rabid. /,:`o i Animal Control Contract Kodificatious December 3, 1986 Page 2 4. Investigation of complaints of nuisance spot request during routine patrol. 5. Removal of dead animals in the public rigbt -of -way. 6. Investigation of reported dog bites. 7. Providing a dog license program and conducting clinics for the vaccine tiou of dogs. 8 Providing for the return of all licensed dogs whenever possible. 9. Conducting a house -to -house caovas within the City for the purpose of ascertaining the umber of ®licensed dogs and to license such doge daring the actual canvos. gerv'ce Level Ontigum In response to the City's request, the County provided several options for modifying the level of service of animal coutrolt ANTNas CONTROL SWRVICF LIVII OPTICgg Total Total count. Col[ city Coat service $105,400 b 9,:00 8113,900 8105,400 826,300 8131,700 8105,400 850.900 8156,300 8105,400 882,700 8188,100 Lags 1. All options above include twenty -four beer emergency service, euforcvtnt of laws and Ordinances, pick -up of dead animala, implementatim of computerised licensing prograe, implementation of educaticnal programs to the public, door -to -door eaovesieg for rabies, vaccinations and licenses, and shelter services. 2. County costs are paid by licensing fees fecerated frog the Count implemented dog licensing pro3rara. Coon y Personnel Provided Cost Option 1 On -cell response in City 70 bra. per week Option 2 Full time officers designated to City 90 hrs. per week Option 3 Fall time officers designated to City 120 bra. per weak Option 4 Fall time officers designated to City 160 bra. per week Total Total count. Col[ city Coat service $105,400 b 9,:00 8113,900 8105,400 826,300 8131,700 8105,400 850.900 8156,300 8105,400 882,700 8188,100 Lags 1. All options above include twenty -four beer emergency service, euforcvtnt of laws and Ordinances, pick -up of dead animala, implementatim of computerised licensing prograe, implementation of educaticnal programs to the public, door -to -door eaovesieg for rabies, vaccinations and licenses, and shelter services. 2. County costs are paid by licensing fees fecerated frog the Count implemented dog licensing pro3rara. '1 Animal Control Contact Modifications {' Deember 3, 1986 Page 3 Option 1 - Retain Current Level of Service Maintain the current level of service to include on equivalent of 1.75 full time soimal control officers to patrol the City seven days a week, eleven hours a day. Service would also include twenty -four hoar emergency service enforcement of love and Ordinances, pick -up of dead animals, implementation of a computerised licensing system, implementation of educational programs ' to the public, door -to -door canvasing for rabies vaccinations and licenses, and sheltering services at the Ban Bernardino County Animal Swelter in Devote. �. The cost of this service would be 0113,900, with a direct coat to the City of 08,500. action 2 - Moderste lecresse in Level of Service The County would provide to equivalent of 2.23 full time animal control officers which would patrol the City seven days a meek, fourteen hours a day. Additional services would include twenty -four boar emergency service, enforcment of laws and Ordinances, pick-op of dead animals, implementation of computerised licensing system, implementation of educational programs to the public, door - to-door canvasing fir rabies, vaccinations and licensing, and sheltering services at the Ran Bernardino County Animal Shelter in Devote. This service level option voula allow for the designation of at least one animal control officer for the City of Rancho Cocemoaga (only) forty hours per meek, Monday througl `Friday, from ' 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. This mould allow for quicker resposse to service, calla and for better relations between the officer and the City. The cost for this service level option is 0131,700, with a direct cost to the City of 016,300. Option 3 - Crester Tucresse in Level of Service The County would provide ao equivalent of 3.0 full tint animal control officers to patrol the City seven days a week, tvmty -four hours a day. Services mould also include Beaty -four hour emergency service, enforcement of laws and Ordinances, pick -up of dead animals, implementation of computerised licensing syLtm, implementation of educational programs to the public, doer- to-door caawasing for rabies, vaccinations and licenses, and sheltering services at the San Bernardino County Animal Shelter in Devote. This service level option would designate two animal control officers to the City (only) forty hours per week each, Monday through Friday, BOO a.m. to 5:00 P.M. The cost for this service levol option is 0156,300, with a direct coat to the City of 050,900. j. Animal Ccucrol Contract Modifications December 7, 1966 Page 4 F Optlon 4 - Greatest tugreate in Level' f Service She County world provide to equivalent of 4.0 lull time .cinal control officers to patrol the City seven days a week, twenty -four hours a day. Service would also include twenty -four boor emergency services, enforcement of laws and Ordinances, pick -up of dead saimals, implementation of computesiaed licensing system, implementation of educational programs to the public, doorto -door camssing for rabies, vaccinsticus and licenses, and sheltering services -at the San Bernardino County Animal Shelter in ;;;ore. This service lnel option would designate two animal control officers to the City fifty -wiz hours per week, each day St00 a.m. to 5r00 p.%. She cost for this service level option is 018S,100s with a direct cost to the City of 182,700. Summary With the Increased service levels in recent years, it is staff's recommeadatios that the City Council increase the level of animal control services peovidad to the community. With the County responding to over 15,000 animal central calls per year, current service levels do not appear adequate and will not continue to be satisfactory to meet the needs of gaucho Cuemonga. Staff recommends service level option 42 in order to'provide a full time animal control officer designated within the City of Tancho•Cawouga only. This service level would allow for note efficient response to citizen requests for service and would provide a more cooperative working relationship betwem County personnel and City staff. Since the animal control contract does not have a termination date, it would be appropriate to approve option t2 and allow sufficient time to evaluate that servize level in effectively meetiug the needs of the community. A greater increase in the level of service could be considered in the future in the event the torrent levels were not satisfactory. If yon have any questions or concerns regarding tSin matter. please feel free to contact me. MSL /dja /a 3 e Kr X• L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3. i9S6 TO: City Co ®Cil and City M.aeager PROS: Bark R. Lorimer, AGoiniatrative Aaalyat ItLLi.YC.' SUBJECT: MDM Cj*TZCL r01f7aarr Attached is a copy of the aniaul control contract with the County of San Ee ruardino. A reviaioa to the contract is cnrreotly being ccnpleted and will be made available to the City Pauocil on Hoaday, Docembet 1. iSSS. %ML /dja Attached .i, i CDUr1TYOFSANa2RNAROINO STANDARD CONTRACT rryPn Mlma FOR COUNTY USE ONLY THIS CONTRACT h called the Ccun enterrd Into in the Stato o} CaU /amla b ,..,,,. ry, and Y and bel"een the County of San Oemardino, hereafter CITY OF line CU - -_— ^�0 Baeelino CANONGA hareafterealled Cit Rancho Cut emon a. CA 91730 elRn c,o �� I.C.I.I IO HO Nigl.l $.p„1 IT 13 HEREBY AGR EEO AS FOLLOWS: afafen Mbw rtd�8».dm, dYwR.S'o:IoreS :e,w4r ro delnArnd, ::o 6-1d, mn xi ofpy rugL dme cmra'tlar a p / ,'. oadresd u, ndr/tWrW, /lam j prfw`n for mdnado�. o WHEREAS, the Cit a'Ir armrF nd PerfOrmanca of s e y is desirous of contraetln P cified sbrvice by Count} Officers County Y for the Cover. Article i, Cho employees, and anent Code authorizes Chapter Part 21 Division and unty to ass 1• Title 5, of the tone certain City functions, effect, County Code Section 16.0213A(b) ,Tema a a City ordinance, ins in f NOW THEREFORE, full force and RE IT IS AGREED AS FOL*_OWS: 1' County shall Provide through its Public Health Do such other agency as the Board of Supervlaora animal control cervices Department, or the Performed crabedl.'�mletoOfthel� tunny. Stich a� Dopsrtment,to clude, rmed under Cho tens to, thou services ervices may ,ia- County Code P 1 and 2 of Division 2ttOf Title 3 Title 3 of the 2 a. Enforce hallby agrees to provide tt fol'_oainq spat functions: the iseuing - OtLnteordinances Pertaining to animals of ordinances. as necessary for violation; ' including of said b, fora he return of 1 caught at licensed large, including cats, and Provide all licensed dogs vhenovar Possible. 1: {ao lC;�'a fi 4 rri 7i. c. Quarantine as prescribed by law all animals suspected to be rabid. d investigate complaints of nuisance by animals upon request during routine patrol. e. Remove dead animals on the public right -of -way. f. Investigate reported dog bites. g. Provide a program whereby dog licenses may be issued by mail; clinics and during house -to -house canvassing; and send renewal notices by mail to owners of currently licensed dogs together with an application for renewal. i � h. Conduct clinics for the vaccination of doge. r,- i. Develop a plan and conduct a house -to -house canvass within the City for the p,=pose of ascertaining the number of unlicensed dogs and to license such dogs during the actual canvass. The County shall give notice of the requirements of existing ordinances and laws with respect to the licens- ing of such dogs and the obligation of the owner(s) or other responsible persons to apply for and obtain such licenses. A written citation will be issued at the time of canvass to any person required to purchase a dog license and who fails to purchase said license at the time of canvass. The County agrees during the canvassing period to attempt to make 1001 total canvassing coverage of the entire City area. Such service shall include the designation of one officer to operate within the limits of the Ctty between 0100 hours and 1700 hours Monday through Friday. j Assign officers to provide an average of one hundred and twelve hours per seven day week, in the performance of the functions specified in Sections a. through i. above. The number of hours per week include, but are not necessarily limited to, routine mobile patrols, investigative and rescue time, court appearances and impoundment of dangerous, wild, injured or loose animals. k Provide a night mechanism to answer telephones from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. Sunday through Saturday and an Officer after regular hours to offer limited special and emergency service to the public in the field seven days a week. Special and emergency service includes, but is not limited to, responding to either a citizen's request or request from the Sheriff's office to aid an injured animal(c), or to impound a dangerous, sick or injured animal, or attempt to locate a stray biting animal. 1. Enforce those sections of State law relating to damages to owners of livestock killed by dogs. m. The county Health Officer shall dsterr-ine any other level o'_ service provided within the City. `•i ��� Page 2 9 3. City shall compensate County in the a= of $26,300 plus an amount equal to the fees collected attendant to Paragraph 4 for services provided in this agreement. Such compensation shall cons�itute full payment, including reimbursement for supervision, c cal assistance, and other overhead coats. 4. The County shall use County Code Section 16.0213A(b) in the administration of an animal licenai program in the absence of action by the City to adopt an ordnance revising fees for an animal license program. All fees co..lected by County pursuant to County Code Section 16.0213A(b) shall be retained by County. 5. All Fork performed by County shall be performed in County offices or at such locations as designated by the County Health Officer. 6. This agreement shall be effective on July 1, 1986, and shall remain in effect through June 30, 1987, but shall automatically be extended beyond this data unless terminated or amended. This agreement may be terminated any time with or without cause by City or by County on written notice given to the other at least 60 days before the date specified for such termination. In the case of such tarn. nation, the total fees collected attendant to an annual licensing program in the jurisdiction of the City for the year in which the termination occurs will be prorated between the City and County. 7 To facilitate the performance of functions as provided for in this agreement, it is hereby agreed that the County shall hove full cooperation and assistance from the City, its officers, agents, and employees. 0, For the purpose of performing said services in this agreement, County shall furnish all necessary materials, supplies, and equipment. 9. Notwithstanding anything hereinabova stated, it in agreed that in all instances wherein special supplies, stationery, notices, forme, and the like must be issued in the name of the City, the same shall be supplied by said City at its own cost and expense. 30. All persons employed in the performance of such services and functions for the City shall be County employees; and no County employees sW l have any City pension, civil service, or other status or right. 11. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the purpose of performing such services and functions and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance thereof where necessary, every County officer and employee engaged in the performanco of any service herannder shall be deemed to be an officer or employee of the City, which services are within the scope of this contract and are purely municipal functions. /a � D Page 3 12. The City shall.not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wages, or other com- panantion_to any County officer or employee performing services hereunder for the City, Except an herein other - wive epocifled, the City shall not be liable for com- pennation or indemnity to any County officer or ea^s.yee for injury or Sickness arising out of his employme.s 13. The City will indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmleas from loss, coats, or expenses cacsed by the negligent or I rongful acts or omissions of City Officers, agents, and employees thextent thatg such tliaPerformanceeaof this contracs. by the provisions of Government Code Section 895.2. 895.2. County 14• The County will indemnify, defend, and held the City harm- less from loss, costs, or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of County offlcrrs, agents, end employees occurring in the performan„z .sf this contract to the extent that such liability is tmpoaed on the City by the provisions of Government Code. Section 895.2. COUNTY Of SAN BBRNARDINO Chalrtnan, Board a Supe son ATTESTED: Clerk o tho 80ard o FS up ,Mson rr..awroty.r bare _.. By_ Dated Address Isab /I <oryoaaen,,,<rp,Y.y , -� APMY ACTNLbItxlCAp `: Om ��� t rqr 4el d Date: To: From: By: Subject: CITY OF ILLNCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 3, 1986 City Council and City Hanger Bill Holl -v. Community Services Director vcnty(e49�1 i77 Mtren McGuire- Emery, Assistant Park Planner Approval of Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of 1986 Community Parklands Act Applications for two (2) Projects. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the CSLy Council approve the Attached Resolution. Background: In May of this year, the city counnil approved a resolution in support of Proposition 43, which placed before the voters of California a bond measure to provide funding for the 1986 community Parklands Act. rho State of California, Departnent of Parka and Recreation has indicated that grant applications for funding consideration under this Bond Act are to be submitted by December 12, 1936 The full allocation availab /e to the City for parkland acquisiticn, development or rehabilitation is $199,000.00. This funding is available over a three - year period, commencing in 1987 -Pa, and can be as much as 300% of the total project cost. There are two projocte which staff believes are worthy of grant funding. The first p- •oject, recommended by tho Park Development Commioaion, includes the addition of a hardcourt (basketball) facility to those parks already in existence which are 'large enough to support the feature. The total estimated coat to retrofit these sites with a hardcourt facility would not exceed $50,000.00. Staff recommends that the remaining $149,000.00 be directed to the development of he North Town Park site, located on £oron Blvd., wast of Turner. This grant funding would supplement the $100,000.00 already allocated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the park development. Construction of this 5 acre site in scheduled to begin in June 1907. SAMPLE RESOLUTION Resolution Rnt Ole RESOLUTION OF THE City Council (Title of Governing Body; 1 e , City Cou&cltt Beard of Supervisors) Of City of Rancho �tICBmon a APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS City, Ccum Y, District UNDER THE COMMUNITY PARKLANDS ACT Or 1986 for the following project(,) Additions to Existing Park Sites North Town Park Develooment Attach separate Sheet for additional projects WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the Community Parklands Act of 1986, which provides funds Lo the State of Celifo rnia and its punt ral Subdivisions for acquiring and Aeveioptmg facilities for public recess - ttonal and historical purposes; aid WnEREAS, the Star. Department of Parks and Recres ►ion ham been delegated the Tcvponstbilicy for the adnloistrattan of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local saencles under the program; and WHERFAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the epproval of appliea- t.on($) before submission of said appllcstion(s) to the state- and WHEREAS, said applic&tiov(s) Contain assurances that the applicant must COMPLY with; and WHEREAS, the applicant agency will entwr into an agreement with the btvte of California for acquisition, davelepment, rehabilitation or restoration of the project(a); NOW, THERt ►ORE. It IT RESOLVED that the City CCUaCfI hereby: (Title of Governing Body) 1 Approve$ the filing of av application for Community Parklands Act of 1986 state grant assistance for the abova project(s); and 2 Certifies that said agency understands the assurances rid certification in the opplicstion font and 5 Cerriftes that amid agency has or will have sufficient funds to operate and matnta.n the projsat(s); and S Certifies that estd agency uil, complete the project(s) within threq years from date of approval by the state; and 5 Appoints the Director, of on mini a vices as &gout of _the Tlt le . not name) City of Rancho Cucamonga to coaduct all negotiations, execute and mohair (City, Coomcyt DLscrIct) all dueuments including but not limited to applieationst agreements, ameadreatx, '> Payment requests, and so on, which may be necessary for the complatioa of the &torementioned project(,). ATTEST: I .1 ry 6 1 s, 4 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer n G r C z tzn 1 SUBJECT: Appeal of Development Review 86 -26 - Barton Development 1. aryn_n� — The appeal of Conditions of Approvai requiring it) eie uodergrounding of existing overhead utilities'along Arrow Route, and (2) a drainage study and possible storm drain construction within Jersey Boulevard for a 5:.1 acre Haste. Plan located on the south side of Arrow Route east of 1'tica Avenue in the General Industrial 0istrict Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the conditions of approval for Development Revt!w No. 86 -26 and deny the appeal request. In addition staff recommends that the final decision be applied to Tentative Parcel Map No. 10237 which is subject to the same conditions. 11. ABSTRACT: The Developer is requesting the deletion of the Planning Commission conditions requiring (1) the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along the project frontage of An-ow Route, and (2) the requirement for a drainage study and possible storm drain construction within Jersey Boulevard. After eiscuscior with staff the Developer has withdrawn hit apoeai of the storm drain condition. III. BACKGROUND: The protect was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on October 8, 1986. The approval resolution containing the conditions in question and the meeting minutes are attached as Exhibit 'A ". The Developer's appeal letters are attached as Exhibit "B ". The appeal was originally scheduled for November 19, 1966, but was continued to tonight. The protect consists of seven phases as shown on Exhibit "Cl and is considered an extension of the existing Rancho Cucamonga Business Park located on the north side of Arrow Rout?. fa�>o r 7 .f ' �Y CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ' DR 86 -26 - BARTON DEVCLOPNENT CO. " November 191 1986_ Page 2 a 9 IV. ANALYSIS:. _ Existing overhead utilities are located on the project (south) side of Arrow Route along the project frontage (refer to Exhibit •D•). This particular line of utilities extends nearly the total width of, the City. It has been the objective of the City thrcugh the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission to r`quire esthetically designed development. In keeping with this objective, the Planning Commission hr: determined that existing overhead utilities are particularly unsightly. Therefore, the Commission has adopted a policy (refer to Exhibit •E•) requiring projects to underaround existing overhead utilities located adjacent to project frontages. Realizing that utility undergrounding is expensive, the Commission policy has provided for cost sharing between projects located on bath sides of a street, this is accomplished by requiring ° developments to underground the lines on its side of the street, and where possible, collect fees from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street for one -half the undergrounding costs for reimbursement to the developer. However, there are cases where the property across the street is already developed, therefore cost sharing is ret possiblt, In this case the development with the utilities on its side of the street is required to bear the total cost of undergrounding. Although he did not specifically state this in his appeal letter, it is staff's understandinq that Mr. Barton's main objection to the undergrounding reouirment is that he falls under the case of not being able to be reimbursed for the full half costs, therefore he feels his is being treated unfairly. It is true that 'this situation is not ideal in terms of cost sharing, however it is not unusual in that many other projects have been conditioned similarly. , The undergroundinq requirement is particularly important• and justified for this project for the following reasons: 1. It conforms to an established Planning Commission Policy that is being applied City wide. i 2. Arrow Route is designated as a Special Boulevard by the City General Plan and is a major arterial which will carry a significant. amount of traffic. Therefore, the removal of unsightly utilities is of particular significance. - •' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REFOU OR 86 -26 - BARTON DEYELOPNENT CO. November 19, 1986 Paue 3 3. The portion of Arrow Route from Turner Avenue to Rochester avenue presents one of the best Opportunities within the City to accomplish a long length of undergrounding Elon9 a single street through development contribution. Exhibit 'F' shows the status of development and current undergrounding obligations along this portion of Aran+. 4. The south half of Arrow along the project frontage is unimproved, which has been a concern to the Council in evaluating previous utility appeals. S. the project is of sufficient size (51.4 acres) to support the cost of undergrounding. Many smaller pproportionate cost. In fairness to Hrr. Barton, It should be noted that he has not appealed the condition requiring him to pay a III for one -half the cost of the future undergrounding of utilities on the south side of darsay Boulevard. However, this obligation is much smaller than that for Arrow Route. 6. The developer has the possibility of be:ag reimbursed for one -half the established cost of undergrounding the portion of utilities east of Red Oak Street upon development of the vacant property on the opposite (north) side of the street. In summary, it is recommended that the Council deny the appeal for the reasons stated. Respectfully submitted, ,Qavt�c� //itater�vri Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:me Attachments Exhibit: Description: 'A" Approval Resolution G Minutes •8• Appeal Letter •C" Project Master Plan "D• Utility Photos •E" Undergrounding Policy Resolution "F• Development Status RESOLUTION NO. P6-160 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA pLAHNING COMISSiON APPROVING OEVELGFHEHT REVIEW NO. 06.26 FOR A 51.4 ACRE MASTEk PLAN, Aiifi PNASE I AND II DEVELO►1E11T CONSISTING OF 16 LIGHT MAfUFACTUAINC AUILDINGS TOTALING 217,592 SQUARE FEET LOCATED NETWED AMOV NIMAI AND JERSEY AVENUE. DET KEEN UTICA AVENUE AD VINCENT STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT was filed o�YEArrownRAncho CUC6Mnps Ltd. ffor,review. ofcthelaboreDCescribed project; ant WHEREAS, on the Otn day of October, 1916, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning COMisstan held a mautfng to consider the Dove- described project. fal l cos: WOW. *WER"E. the R"10 Cucamonga plant :tng Commission reiolvgd as SECTION 1: That the following can ba art: 1. Ttrt the proposed project is consistent with the orgectives of the Gmtera1 Plan and Industrial Specific Plan; and 2. That the proposed use it In accord with the Objective of the Industrial SPOCtffe Plan and the purposes of the tdstrfct in whtch the site is leuted; and 3. That the proposed use is In compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and DCarvvelosl�sssnt Code; and 4. That applicable thdt41A, Villl t094'thW with the Mt be detrimental ndtotthe public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propbrtfas Ur Improvements in the vicinity. environmen��in� 2: at a Negative Oocl&rattanlis not is uedtan OctoD�rt6 a1486.n the SECTION 3: That Oeveloisbnt Review No. DR 06.25 is approved subject to the f0TTTng conditions and Attached Standard Conditions: CrrY OF R.A114CHO CUCAMONGA LA .i. � M: , "PLANNING,COMNISSI " RESOLUTION =• r- October 8, 1986 DR 66-26 - Aja /Barton Page 2 Planning Division �:.�. /3o �S J 1. The Nester Plan is approved in concept Only and future i• development for each phase /parcel shall be subject to Davelopment /cosiggn Review pro :mss fo.• Planning Commission , approval. Development /Oesiga review 4s approved herein for Ph&Sts 4 shall bo sugiectdto P14nMMi Scmi sionapprov,11. Plan 2. The conceptual design including the number and location of 4riveways along Arrow Route for phases V1 y i.. and VII is not approved. Revised conceptual- design shall be submitted for Design Review Cwwittee :yview and approval prior to submitting for Develope"t Review process. E. 3. ;YS developer xhali continue the existing landscaping 'hems of the existing Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. !, 4. The developer shall provide seating beaches and other i hardscapa within courtyards, office entrance areas and plaza areas. A Engineering Division r I. OVERHEAD UTILITIES: ti —�� a. ARROW ROUTE - The existing overhead utilities (to]ecrmrunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west si4a of Utica Ave. to the first pole east of the project boundary, prior to Public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever W,Vrs first. Reimbursement of ono -half the adopted cost of undarground(ng from future devNop"nt as it Occurs On the Opposite side of the street is feasible from the presently undeveloped properties. 1 b. 4 SEV BLVD. - An in -lieu f•^ as contribution to the future underground(ng of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Jersey Blvd. shall be paid to the City prior to the fxxWnce of building ` permits. The tee shall be one -half the adopted unit amount tiams` ? the length of the project frontage 1420 feet). �:.�. /3o �S J PLANNING COlMISSION RESOLUT:ON 4 - - ' October 8, 1986 OR 86-26 - Aja /beton Page 3 - -� 2. A drainage study shall be provided by the developer's _ Engineer, and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Permits (foundation, grading, building, etc.) for any project. The study shall specifically address: a. The impacts of drainage to the intereeetioa of •• - Red Oak Street and Jersey Blvd, including potential flows crossing Jersey Blvd; b. An analysii of flows in Jersey Blvd. including street capacity and the need for possible storm drains; and c. A plan identifying when needed drainage facilities are required in terms of project phase construction. , All necessary drainage facilities shall be constructed with the improvements for the project. 3. Red Oak Street shall be constructed for its entire length from Arrow Route to Jersey Brvd. upon construction of ' Phase 11. 4. Sidewalk is required on one side of Red Oak Street between Jerse Blvd. aid Arrow Route; however, meandering sidewalk seyh S. The d ivewys along Red Oak Street Shall be constructed as follows: a. A 30 -foot wide driaa- approach at the property line. b. A 16 -foot throat depth from the public street curb to the fiat parking stall. 6. Access shall be provided to Phase IV of the Hasi•r Plan prior to issuance of any building permits for Phase It. Access is currently prohibited to Vincent Avenue by a 10 foot wide strip of land under private oinership. 7. The location and design of the driveways onto Arrow Route are not approved as shown on this Asta,- plan. Hwtver, three (3) driveways will be allowed between Utica and Red Oak and one (1) east of Rea Oak. 8. t The developer shall pay all reimbursement fees per City Council Resolution No. 8b -328 executed by Oman Corporation r for construction of ImPeOv"Ata' on Arrow Route prior to ; Issuance of building permits for Phases VI and VII of the Plaster Plan. 7 " ,t e /-31 PLANNING COMIISSIOI :SOLUTION October. 8. 1985 DR 86 -26 - Ma /Barton Page d APPROYEII AND ADOPTED THIS 8111 DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. PLANMr- C(WISSIdf OF ITE CITY OF RANCHO CULAHOH6A I I n) ATTEST I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of ttr, Planning Coaeissfon of the City ,f Rancho Cucaamga, do hereby certify th+.c the fore8oing Resolution was dwi; and CltylofiNanchoca4, passed, and :,ioptM by the Planning Coaaatsston of the City yO 8th conga, /t s regular awwting of the Plaming Comission held day of Dewber, 1966, by the following rote -to -wit: tT AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, "CNIEL, BARKER, TOLSIOY, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE e M A DRAM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - OCTOBER 8 1986 - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REdtEH 86-26 - AJA- BARTON - The consiW ,g of 7 light manufacturing buildings toteli ng 86,592 square feet on 4.29 acres of land; and Phase II development consisting of 9 light manufacturing buildings totaling 131,000 square feet on 7.49 acres of ,. land, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located between Arrow Highway and Jersey Avem;e, between Utica Avenue and Vincent Street - Nancy Fong, Associate Flanner, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout invited public comment. Jim Barton, 8409 Utica, Rancho Cucamonga, presented slides of the proposed tandscapinS• Commissioner Chides asked the size and location of the seating benches within the plaza areas. Mr. Barton indicated that there would be one bench of approximately 6 feet in size placed in each entry courtyard. He advised that they would be placed in such a way that people who use them can have greater Illusion of privacy. Comisszioner Tolstoy stated that he liked the plazas; however, they seem to be more of entryway plazas. He was concerned that one six foot bench in each plaza area would be Inadequate. Mr. Barton advised that he had spent many thousands of dollars on the construction of the plaza areas within the office buildings on Utica Avenue, which are not being used. His personal opinion on the requirement for plazas within freestanding buildings is that they are totally useless. Commissioner Tolstoy felt that as the landscaping grows and the benches become more shaded more people will use them. Mr Barton pointed out that there are a lot of shaded areas in the existing projects, but the plazas are still not being used. He indicated that most of the tenants In this type of product are providing space within their shops for employees to spend their break and lunch times. Commissioner Stout stated his understanding was that the applicant was not asking for approval of the Master Plan portion along the Arrow frontage because certain traffic issues had not been worked out. Mr. Barton stated that he was willing to remove Phases 6 and 7 five this approval process provided that the Engineering staff gives the direction that there is the potential for three driveways an the westerly portion and one driveway on the easterly portion of the parcel. he indicated that he had discussed this issue with the City Engineering staff, and felt that an v agreement had been reached. Mr. Barton referred to the condition relative o overhead utilities and agreed to pay the one -half fee for duture undergrounding on the south side of Jersey Boulevard. However, he did not agree to the required undergrounding along Arrow Route, Condition La. because • the property on the north side of Arrow is fully developed and there is no ability for the City to collect fees to reimburse him because the City did not require undergrounding as a condition of approval for those properties. He additionally requested that the fees for Arrow be paid with Phase 6 and 7 development. He agreed to do an engineering analysis for the drainage as required in Engineering condition 2, but would like the understanding that this property is in an assessment district for storm drain construction. He felt that under that assessment district the City took on the responsibility to design an adequate storm drain system to cover water removal from Jersey, Utica and Vincent. If something is missing from the City's design, he did not feel it should be his responsibility to replace that system. He requested a a cleuse stating that any storm drains necessary within Jersey are the City's _ reaponsibility because they have already collected fees for them. He Werred to Engii..'rirg Condition 5 requiring a 25 -foot throat depth from the public street curb to the first parking stall and stated that this condition is an undue hardship. He requested that the condition require a minimum 10 feet from the property line. He additionally requested that Engineering condition 7 specify the number of driveways and their approximate location subject to review by staff and Design Review Committee. Regarding Standard Condition H- 3, he advised that drainage fees have already been pcid through the assessment district and requested that the condition be stricken. He noted that in Standard Conditions S.+ct'on M street improvements for Utica should have been inc.uded. There were no further public comments. Chairman Stout requested staff to explain how the assessment distri.t works with respect to drainage fees. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, advised that the backbone storm drain system within the area was put in under the assessment district. All properties within the boundaries of the drainage area contributing water to these pipes is assessed fees on a yearly basis to pay off the bonds. Chairman Stout if the drainage ordinance approved by the City Council would exempt the properties within the assessment district because of their contribution to the assessment. Mr. Hanson replied that it did. Chairman Stout stated that if the Council established that ordinance, the Commission does not have the authority to change it and that the assessments should apparently be in place of the fee. He asked for discussion of street access on Arrow and asked if staff had reached some sort of agreement with the applicant. Paul Rougeau, City Traffic Engineer, advised that there had not been an agrxawent but staff had discussions with the applicant as to whether or rat the master plate as shown is acceptable. He advised that staff did not consider the master plan acceptable and had explored several options for driveway alignment which would include three driveways between Utica and Red Oak which would mirror the drivesiay alignment on the opposite side of the street, or two driveways not mirrored. 1351 1 o 1 ,x Chairman Stout asked for discussion of utility undergrounding to the area of Utica and Red Oak. Mr. Hanson advised that this would not be the first case where Lndergrounding was required without the potential for reimbursement. Cumissloner Barker asked if there was any direction frrm the City Council after its last utility undergrounding appeal decision. Mr. Hanson advised that the appeal which was approved by the City Counctt was I unique case in that the street improvements were already in PIS the case in this instance. Council which 15 Commissioner Mcillel stated that over the past several months, the Commission has assumed a posture on the undergror'nding of utilities and felt that consistency should be maintained unless here 1s a different directive frog the City Council. Commissioner Chitlea agreed that the utility undergrounding should be done as Council sees fit to and as policy ftaisithere responsibility to doh s city Commissioner Barker stated that since the Commission has been given no specific direction by the City Council, the utility undergrounding policy should rtmain a requirement of projects. Commissioner Tolstoy concurred that the policy needs to be consistent. I Chairman Stout sttted that district relative to the discussion of the assessment Issue, the drainage fee requirements should be deleted fray the Standard Conditions. Mr. Hanson &greed with Mr. Bartan's concern about the fee payment in the Standard Condition section; however, disagreed with regard to Condition 2 of system, Itndiidn't Puteindeve that the drain; thereforrt LindivlJualW development backbone may need to occasionally put to a local drain. The condition indicates that a drainage study 1s required to be approved by tha City Engineer, and staff would be fair with Mr. Barton in deliberations of that study. Mr. Barton advised that he wanted it made clear that the assumption 1s that Jersey would have enough capacity to carry whatever water, comes through there. If the pipes in Jersey are not properly designed, he did not want to be responsible for that. Paul Rougeau cltelffed the intent of the assessment district and advised that the district put to the system of storm drains that was considered a ouster plan system for the industrial area and it was a Jystem that was defined in the assessment district documents. The intent of the district was that this defined storm drain system would be put in place and that the assessments placed hat were puetsinpwere�bigseo enough to handl all the drainage system. hwouid get to them when all the property 1s built out, but it was not necessarily all the .n /3S h .0 A i t.. pipes that would be needed it the very end. He stressed that the assessment fees do not- alleviate the :ontributors of their obligation to install more drainage pipes to get to the pipes for rhtcn the assessment was made. 'te advised tat there were no pipes installed in Jersey; there were stubs put in Utica and Vincent that were intended to be tied into in the future. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he didn't see how the Commission cou10 make a de- -islon on that issue until the drainage study is completed. Mr. Barton stated that he would not like to continue the project until completion of the drainage study and would prefer to drop the issue. Chairman Stout asked for discussion of Engineering Condition 5 b. regarding the 25 foot minimum throat depth on Red Oak. He indicated that he was satisfied with the way the business park to the north is designed any did not know what the condition would improve by its requirement. Commissioner Chides stated that if there was a problem, she could see changing the requirement, but if there isn't one she did not see the point in changing it. Chairman Stout asked for discussion of the location and design of driveways on Arrow and advised that the applicant desires up to throe driveways from Red Oat to Utica and one to the east of Red Oak. Commissioner Chitiea felt the request was appropriate. Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that the condition be subject to staff and Design. Review approval and that the locations not be site specific. Chairman Stout stressed that the landscaping concept should be .dent1cal or similarly designed as tom project on the north side of Arrow. Ccmmlsslonor Chltiea was concerned that the condition relative to benches in the plaza area was rather vague as to size and location for placement. Chairman Stout suggested that the size and location be determined by the City Planner. Motion: Moved by Chftiea, seconded by McNielI to issue a Negative 0eclaration and adopt the Resolution approving Development Review 86-26 with amendments to Include the addition of Utica Avenue tr Section No Street Improvements, of the standard conditions, removal of "drainage fees' from standard condition 11 -3, Engineering condition 5.b. amended to require throat depths along Red Oak to be s minimum 10 of feet from the property line, Cngineerinp condition 7 amended to reflect review and approval of ttx driveway numbers and locations by staff and the Design Review Committee, Plannine condition 4 amended to require plaza seating bench size and locations to be review and approved by the City Planne Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BARKER, TOLSTOT, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried I II October 17, 1986 • City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Sou Boo Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91710 Attn: city Clerk Ret Environmental Assessment and Develoneent Reviw 86 -Z6 Gentleman: This letter is to serve an our notf•ication to appal conditions approved by the Planning Comaission B October 1986 on the above rofaranced project. The specific conditions to be appealed are: Page 2) Enginsering Division, 1. Overhead utilitisc, a. Arrov Route Page 3) Engineering Division, Z. DroAnage Study /Storm Bever both conditions are being appealed dua to the burden of economic hardship that will be applied to the project. If you have any questions, please feel fras to call. sincerely JemCS L Orton Presidan. JEW= RECEIVED C1Ir Or RANCHO CUCAMCKA wx MiNEEMG OIYISIOR Cal �` t crffi N OCS 0 190; v11 iE8 �9 �� iu �L �l t 2 i'.31410 84M Ur4o Avem^ Rcr * C =mongm CA 71730 (714) 081-906 M 137 rr:--IB-- 4" 0 November 10, 1986 E/1C;6EEk!MO Olv!yery CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 806 Rancho CuCamOnge, CA 91710 Attention: City Clark Regarding: Environmental Atlesasment i Developaent Review 86 -26 Gentlamen: Further to our letter of October 17, 1986 appealing the conditions of approval, we have had several meetings with staff on the above referenced project. In light of those discussions, we respectfully _ th raqu s�t that the appeal bs oat oned from the November 19 lgdrto e December 3, 1986 a a o the City Council. This chano; -• cch!3ula is bein�J raqusated to allow more tiro for etaf4 and ouraelvee to reoolvo differences. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. rely, Dale P y Vice Prasident DP:lf cc: Bamag«noaEacm, 8409 Utica Avenue Ran:ho CucornonpOO. CA91130 (714) 0374996 �f � ✓O =Fe1 m is 9,0 November 16, 1986 RECEIVED I$'v I7 QK CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CE RAKHO CUCAaONS.1 9379 Haas Line Road EAOISEDIW DiVISNn P.O. Box 007 Rancho Cucamcnga, CA 91730 Attention: city Clark Reference: Environmental Aaeasansnt and Parcel New No. 10997 Gentlemen: letter is to serve the Planning as Our appeal 986 onrenditions the above rot fenced projec. The Apecific - inditions to be appealed are: Page N -7 Undargrounding of Utilities Page N -8 Drainage Study /Storm Savor Both conditions are beingq appaaled, duo to the burden of aconoaio hardabip that vi11 be applied to the project. Aft the above parcel map and conditions to ba appealed are diractly related to DR -86 -96 , vs raapacttully raquoat that the two appeals be addressed nimultanecus at the December 3rd session of the City Council. If you have any questions do not hesitate to call. sincerely, TOedent COMPANY Dale Vice Or:lf Sdog Utkc Avenue. RonUq CucpmcIrVQ CA 91730 (714) 987-0996 I I UU u[p al'I ter,- .a�.�.,. LTEJ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E1100&7MWG DA7Xox m No —JL I .rr r •r• •,f�j11. • � Vii_ 1 M1. l •I A` .l. {. •L ar 6 r Y r 1 4 Il 1. 1 1• 'P 4y..4 � rti r,.�� r 1 . ��• diodt 1 i.�f: IJ .rr r •r• •,f�j11. • � Vii_ 1 )1- �• r lr r, •. 1� � � f� `i i r • ' all ar 6 r Y r 1 4 Il 1. 1 1• 'P 4y..4 � rti r,.�� r 1 . ��• diodt 1 i.�f: � � E � | � ) \/ !� �2 \| \� � \� � � «`! .\ `.! /_' lip r�! . �j- ,�\_ ij; � � � ƒ \ | |! ' � f �_ �� � ■ •I ! ! §�,' ■ ■ |§ /l�� \k| | !a /I�� |�� \|,�• � � E � | � ) \/ !� �2 \| \� � \� � � «`! .\ `.! � f !� I | � ! |■| q |2 ■■| '} �| .& ! / �' I �\ } �} ' & |_§ Ij � ; �a3 • •! 4 / \& . f�flNf , � � f ƒ 0 Q ?2 \% ) \ | |! ' ' . ! v v ! ! f •I ! ! §�,' ■ ■ |§ � f !� I | � ! |■| q |2 ■■| '} �| .& ! / �' I �\ } �} ' & |_§ Ij � ; �a3 • •! 4 / \& . f�flNf , � � f ƒ 0 Q ?2 \% ) / \& . f�flNf , � � f ƒ 0 Q ?2 \% ) 0 bla.L.FYAOOa n d axv a'OY7d I7dYp 1s meo saun i o is YCO OIL DM Y7 /An b K ::: ■ 1 0 ti a W CQ W W � O � U cc O O Z Z l5 W Q W F V Q 04 Z Ul W I- O LU LU •• cC� O per} 4r 1 s s BORr, EJ November 25, 1986 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineeriny Division 9320 Base Line Road P.O. Boa 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference. Hydrology Study /Jersey Boulevard Attention: Mr. Barrye R. Monson Regarding our discussion yesterday on the Hydrology Study for DR- 06 -26, DR- 06 -38, ad tentative Parcel Hap No. 10237, we would like to confirm the f011owing: 1) The Hydrology Study dated November 14, 1986 pro pared L. D. King has been reviewed and accepted by the My, a by jolt to minor revisions thtt may become necesoary. water rUn-Off in e 2) basins arc ons s for th and thia erpa hall eaborn by the developer.0ek 3) Tho storm drain in Jersey Boulevard may require to be increased in site from 30 to 36 inches once designedl should this be the case, the expense of upeiaing the Pipe shall be born by the developer. In light of the &hove, Bartcn Devslopment Company respectfully requests that the appeal filed October 17, 1986 and November 16, 1986 be modified to exclude the Drainage Study /Storm Bever. The intent is to appeal the undergrounding of utilities conditions only. Sincernly, DEVE140PXEN`T COMPANY v Dale Yr Vice Pre dent DP :lf cc: Jack Lam City Clark 840g U:fca Avonuo. Rcncbo C amon� CA 91730 (714) 981L996 C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RE, PORT Of GATE: December J, 1986 6 TO: City Council and City Manager Ts FROM: Rathindra (Shintu) Bose, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Judy A. Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT- Order to vacate 22nd Street between Turner Avenue and Deer Creek Channel RECG'"gATIGR Council It Is ordering the vacationtofta portlOnOf 22nd Streeth and that 2the City Clerk cause same to record. Analysis /_ ga�ound At its November S, 1986 meeting, the City Council declared its intention to vacate a portion of 22nd Street between Turner Avenue and Deer Creek Channei. The subject street is 80 feet wide and 1s unnecessary for Drt: _�s or prospective public street purposes. N•. George Rust owns all the property • the north side of 24nd Street and Nr, and M's. John Nunez own the Jroperty on the zauthsfde. qll affected utilities have been notified and concur with the vacation. Notices have been posted at the site and the public hearing date was published in the newspaper. When vacated, the portion of street will revert back to the adjacent properties. Respectfully submitted, RSB:JAA:cg Attachments �i� i� L I w Z cc I •e sr. AA DEVELOPED (S F R) VACANT - ( RUST ) (tVUNEZ ) (SFR) VACANT C C.W. D) ?4w Sf. NOTE ® PORTION TO RUST PROP6RY PORTION TO NUNEZ PROPMTV MY OF RAN MO, CUCAMONGA lq� J W S u a J W C PROPOSED VAC A710 N (ZV5 ST) VACANT (VALATED) - -_ - -_ rl 1 K. EXHIBIT "A° Proposed Legal Description fog the Vacation of the North half of 22nd Street (V -062) The North one -half of 22nd Street (80 feet wide) in Block 68 of the North Cucamonga Subdivision in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as shown on Nap recorded in Book A. Page 8 of Maps, recorded of said County. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion lying East of the Nest line of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District right -of -way as described in deed recorded June 29, 1981 as document number 81- 141374, Official Records of said County k �4 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF IIEMING FOR VACATION OF STREET V -0 62 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BENNARDINO ) 1 declare, unear penalty of making a false oath, that I am naa, and at all times mentioned herein was, the duly appointed, qualified and acts Superintendent of Streets in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. That on the. 18th of November, 1986 1 caused t, have posted a NOTICE OF HEARING FOR VACATION OF STREETS, a copy of which NOTICE is attached hereto and made a part hereof; that the NOTICES were posted not more than three hundred (300) feet apart along the line of the street and that not less than three (3) NOTICES wer so posted and that the po -ting was completed on the 18th of November. 1986. This Declaration made this -/Y4 u of 1986 Superintendent of Streets for the City of Rancho Cucamonga /V ,o . . . . 4 . .......... ...... RESOLUTION N0. % -3�61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ',-HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4CNGA, COUNTY OF SAW BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF 21NND STREET BETWEEN TURNER AVENUE AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 86 -316, passed en November 5, 1986, the COrmcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its Intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:30 p.m, on December 3, )986, In the Lions Park Community Cecter Building, located a. 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. follows: BE T RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucawnga as SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence suomitted that a portimr of—M4 Street between Turner Avenue and Deer Creek Channel Is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes Its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map NO.V -062 on file In the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservat'ons and excep o- n-s,i{ nry, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recor e n the office of the COL.ity Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION A: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resn uTiion; and it shall the -ipon take cffect and be In force. M. a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STAFF REPORT DATE: December 3, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Olen Jones, Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: CONDUCT TEFRA HEARING AND APPROVE THE ISSUANCE BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA- PPIMOALL- PORTERVILLE - COLTON HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY OF NOT TO EXCEED $38,000,U00 nRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF SINGLE FAMILY MORTR,AGE REVENUE BONDS RECOMMEIIDATION: Approve the attached Resolution authorizing the Tssu— y the Rancho Cucamonga - Palmdale- Portervtile- Colton Housing Finance Agency of not to exceed $38,000,000 principal amount of Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds. BACKGROUND: On November lq, 1986, the Council approved the ormat on of a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) with the cities of Palmdale. Porterv111e, and Colton, for the issuance of 1986 Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds. By forming the JPA and issuing bonds under the authority of this new Agency, a mote efficient issue can to had, due to the economies of scale. As a new requirem.ct under the Tax Reform A , Home Mortgage Revenue Bond issues most now conform to the Tax Eqnity and Fiscal Responsibililty Act of 1982. Specifically, the CeunLil must hold a public herring to allow the pdbllr. the epportualty to cnmment on the proposed financing. This hearing 1s Conmonly referred to as a TFFPA hearing. Upon close of the hearing, the attached Resolution is adnpted, approving the issue. ANAL ISIS: The attached Resolution approves the issuance by the Ra-nc 0 Cucamonga- Palmdale- rorterville- Colton lousing Finance Agen.y of not to exceed $38,000,000 principal amount of Single Frady Mortgage Revenue Bonds. $10,000,000 of this issue is specifically reserved for four developers in the City (William Lyon Co., Lewis Homes, The Andet. Group, and Houck Development, Inc.) By Issuing these bonds, the JPA will make available below - market home loans to first time home buyers of single family homes With the enactment of Federal Tax Reform legislation, the ruallfying limitations have become more restrictive. None of the /S0 CITY STAFF REPORT Tefra Ifearing /Rancho December 3, 1986 Page 2 Cucamonga -Pal Irma Ie- Portervtile- Cotton arcomparisonuOf theeOldeand thetnowblimltsnew rules. Fallowing is Old Limits New Limits Income $ 40,693 Purchase Price $128,810 $ 35,190 $106,000 Respec ful1� °vYl./daf ted, ar.K Lam, AICP, Community Development Director JL /kap Attachment: Resolution /1.5/ RESOLUTION NO. C'/ '35-0 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING ISSUANCE BY THE RANCHO CUCAKONGA-PALMDALE-PORERVILLE- COLTON HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY OF NOT TO EXCEED 538,000,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE RCVENUE BONDS RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga - Palmdale - Porterville- Colton Housing Finance Agency (the 'Agency') proposes to issue its Rancho Cucamonga-Palmdale- Porterv111e- Colton Housing Finance Agency Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bands (the °bonds'), in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $33,000,000 umler ana pursuant to Part 5 of Division 32 of the California Health and Safety Code, of which $10,000,000 of the proceeds will be allocated in order to provide financing Home Hortgages to be made t• buyers of (1) approximately 34 Homes to be constructed by The William Lyon Company in Victoria Village located along Victoria Street and Route 15 within the City; (11) approximately 35 Homes to be constructed by Houck Development Inc. In Villa Paloma located at the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard within the City; (111) approximately 37 Homes to be constructed by The Anden Group in Cimmaron Oaks located at the intersection of Turner Avenue and Arrow Highway; and (iv) approximately 30 Homes to be constructed by Lewis Homes of California located along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue within the City. if for reasons beyond the control of the participants the foregoing proceeds are not applied to the described projects then, to the extent permitted by state and federal law, such moneys may be applied to the following described projects. (a) (i) approximately 'S Homes to be constructed by Emblem Development Car oration in Tract No. 10048 located at Rosedale Avenue and La Loma Avenue; (ii) 40 Homes to be constructed by Forecast Corporation in Meadowood Homes located north of Citrus Avenue, south of Johnson Avenue and west of Grand Avenue; (111) 30 Homes to be constructed by Jenel Comp ny In Iron Horse Ranch located west of Pepper Avenue and north of San 8ernar^1no Avenue; and (iv) 80 Hores to be constructed by Presley of Southern Califor. .a in its project known as Cedarbrook Homes located north of San Bernardino Avenue and east of Sycamore Avenue, all within the City of Colton. (b) (i) approximately 52 Homes to be constructed by Sherwood Homes in Sherwood Park Units !4 located at Henderson Avenue (one- quarter mile east of Westwood Street) and Sherwood Park Units 15 (one- quarter mile east of Westwood Street); ;ii) approximately 20 Homes to be constructed by Phyllis Garlin in Sierra Woods located at the northwest corner of Morton Avenue and Leggett Drive; (111) approximately 20 Homes to be constructed by Daley Enterprise, Inc. in Hillside Estates located at the northeast corner of Horton Avenue and Leggett Drive within the City and 19 units it Clenn Grove Estates located at the southeast corner of Westfield Avenue and Lowery Street; and (tv) Y+ approximately 75 Homes to be constructed by Guaranty Construction Co. in Loan /1� 4: Oak Estate located at Poplar Avenue west of Jaye Street within the City of Porterville. (c) (i) approximately 34 Homes to be constructed by Tiffany Development Co to Quail Meadows located at 30th Street East and Avenue Q2; (11) 20 Homes to be constructed by Toby Ranch in its three projects known as Sandpiper and Robin's Court located at 25th and R4 and Victoria Meadows located at 16th and 114; and (111) 62 Hom., to be constructed by Marlborough Development Corporatijn in Marlborough Country Palmdale located at 20th Street W and Avenue P within the City of Palmdale. WHER,,AS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore called ana conducted a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds for the purpose of i4oancing thn projects as required by Section 103(k) of the Internal RevenLC Code of 1986, as amended; and WHEREAq. the City Cowuil approves of said transactions in the public interest, of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Clcy of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; Section 1. Findin s and Declarations. The City Council hereby finds and daclares tTat the financing of the projects from the proceeds of the Bonds as herein described serves the public purposes of assisting persons and families of low and moderate income within the Agency to afford the costs of decent, safe and sanitary housing. Section 2. A roval of Issuance and Sale of Bonds. The City Council hereby out —homes t o ssuance o tie on Js y t e gency as heretnabova contemplated. Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect from and after is adoption. /,-3 AFFIDAVti OF Pt/SLtCQi1CN STATE OF r unayN!Qf1"a CA--IFORMA urr o/ NM1I�c"y yw- ""b�" COUNTVOFSAMBERNARDfNO YM^y"• f, Maurine 1) °��M "� rg am thaw" rtlstn anM "..�,,.,,. LRgal I Counsty and Stgene al ci �pa DAILYfREPORT, � t I afO n,Id and tha ed In the Cliy of ontarla t the attached ad,o�s� Of Natic� e— t =611c �t Neap ri��_ .,.. City Council � — .p:^„a City of— anc= C,camone_ was Published in said nc!vspapar�8 =e til time to wit November 19. 1986 correct. a'der Penalty of perjury that the foregoing U 4110 and ' !(S J Datedat Ontario, Callfo ISfgna 1 rNathLt 19th �- Novemb day of � I RECOMMENDATION That the city Council authorize the GoodKin ro0p us n, Hansen, Fehlman Group to perform the services necessary to complete Market Study of Minimum Lot and Unit Sizes in the amount of $14,900 to be paid by the Building Industry Association II. BACKGROUND: Jack Lam, Director of Censunity Development, presented '%ihe City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting of Septmber 17, 1986 a slide presentation of Minimum Lot Sizes and Minimum Telling unit Sizes for single family detaches „nd zero lot line housing Following that p,ecentation, the City Sounc,l accepted the Building Industry Association's offer to fund a study of housing and marketing conditions in relation to the lot size /unit size options presented by staff to the Council The sthrdy was coinissioned as a factual survey to provide data for the Council to use in the decision making process. The primary Objective of the study is to analyze what impact the proposed or any increase in lot size /unit size would have on the housing market in Rancho Cucamonga. The Planning Department, per City Council's direction, advertised for the preparation of the Market Study Six Requests for Proposals were distribl,tA0 to various market consulting Arms throughout Southern California One proposal was received for the Market Study The total cost for the Market Study is $14,900 he Market Study can be completed with delivery of report within 45 days from its initiation /115 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cic'wafo%� STAFF REPORT y. r 0 0 Z u > DATE' December 3, 1906 isn TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE GOOOKIN GROUP /AUSTIN HANSEN FERLMAN The consultant ee not w exceed , w ,e paid by the Building Industry Associition I RECOMMENDATION That the city Council authorize the GoodKin ro0p us n, Hansen, Fehlman Group to perform the services necessary to complete Market Study of Minimum Lot and Unit Sizes in the amount of $14,900 to be paid by the Building Industry Association II. BACKGROUND: Jack Lam, Director of Censunity Development, presented '%ihe City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting of Septmber 17, 1986 a slide presentation of Minimum Lot Sizes and Minimum Telling unit Sizes for single family detaches „nd zero lot line housing Following that p,ecentation, the City Sounc,l accepted the Building Industry Association's offer to fund a study of housing and marketing conditions in relation to the lot size /unit size options presented by staff to the Council The sthrdy was coinissioned as a factual survey to provide data for the Council to use in the decision making process. The primary Objective of the study is to analyze what impact the proposed or any increase in lot size /unit size would have on the housing market in Rancho Cucamonga. The Planning Department, per City Council's direction, advertised for the preparation of the Market Study Six Requests for Proposals were distribl,tA0 to various market consulting Arms throughout Southern California One proposal was received for the Market Study The total cost for the Market Study is $14,900 he Market Study can be completed with delivery of report within 45 days from its initiation /115 CITY CDUNUIL Starr ktYUM Market Study December 3, 1886 Page 2 Please find attached the detail proposal from the GoodKin Group which defines the scope and range of the Market Study, Res a tted Sr a B ` C1ty PO BB:DC:vc /S�1 3. Trends Analysis. Market, economic and planning dynamics establish historic trends from which future projections can be gleaned for Important variables being measured such as: (a) lot size and donelty, (b) unit size and coat, (c) buyer profiles, and (d) local zoning standards Trend lines will mcst likely open 20 fears from 1976 t� 1996 Market demand analysis will be included here. 6 Egullibrium. Equilibrium analysis will foraulate housing abosrption projections compared with projected supply of housing. What products are poscibla under different development standardn will be analyzed. Financial analysis will be performed on each projection to determine econimle foasibility s Product. Our product will be a comprehensive written report with statistical tabled In this report we will provide the City with clear and concise conclusions and recommendatlona which will enable you to make your decisions B. QUALIFICATIONS The Goodkin Group iH the leading rea.. estate advisory firm In the industry For 30 years it hat provide? consultation to a divorce client base in tta bualncso cormunity, including financial Institutions, corporations, developers, securities brokers, mortgage banking organizations, local and state government, and individaal Investors Consultation includon market and feasibility studies, appraisals, highest and beat use analysis, investment advice, marketing advice, directional planning and organizational planning we regularly work with a wide array of industry professionals in eonfidontial relationships The role of Austin Hensen Pohlman /Group will be to act as c planning consultant. The firm has previously worked with The Goodkln Group and other marketing firms in jointly planning large scale residential communities including the 1,400 acre Poclf�c Rim Country Club and Resort and the mixed use Batlquitoo Lagoon Educational Park, both in the City of Carlsbad. 2 - M .l C. PEPSONNEL Three of The Goodkin Group'n top professionals will be assigned to this task Errol Cowan, Ph.D., will be the team leadov, David Adlard will be Project Manager ant Jill Krantz will 's research analyst Our protect teams are structured such that the project manager is rosponsible for the day -to -day operations of the assignment Our team loader is a senior advisor, and our research analyst aaelota In data gathering The professionals who will be assigned from Austin Hansen Fehlman Group include Richard Miller, Senior Project Manager, Patrick J O'Connor, Department Head - Planning, John William Miyawaki, Urban Designer, and Randi F Coop,.ramith, Vice President, Director of Planning D. STUDY METHODOLOGY Our e�mmu,lties are rapidly changing Growth firms and refermP Llteatyle changes create now consumer and business :code We will consider the Rancho Cucamonga community today and tomorrow The revenue aspects of residential land uses will be compared with the coots Political and planning feasibility of the residential uses will be cons_dsred 1 Market Analysis The Goodkin Group will conduct the market analysis All current and projected residential developments will be identified within the marks Asa. Consumer market segment characteristics and trends , be identified We will comment on the product which ho, Joan designed to fit specific consumer characteristics and needs. The market analysis includes a detailed examination of pricing, common area elements, market timing, lot sizes, hones Plzen and features. 2. General Plan tnalysls. We will review the General Plans and zoning ordinances of Rancno Cucamonga and surrounding areas (Ontario, Fontana and Upland) Particular attention will be paid to the land use and housing :lements. We will also determine the housing product types that are allowed by the General Plano and zoning ordinance for each jurisdiction - 3 - /S1 - - 42. RESPONSE TO REQUEST YOR PROPOSAL Nuvember 13, 1888 AA INTRODUCTION Traditionally. municipalities have made land u,a and zoning decisions on the basis of ad hoc markoting studies provided by members of the development community In many inotoncus Dower precededu the gadoptl n of the General °lPlan. The nOCity haOf prouct tpao, such as Rancho increasingc otnandsunSt sizelont e�aluato the marketiwillt will timely review of the economic implications of the General Pla n, particularly with regard to the 10,01 of development activity in the market at this time The study bllc /privet° important because of the recognition that 4 P partnership is nocasoary to create a diverse and economically staFle community The objectives of the study fall into four basic categories as we understand them In order to understand impacts Of Plan revisions on 0f9parametersmarket we 1 Market Analysis. A compreher.ivo market supply analysis of Rancho Cucamonga and vicinity will be undertakun Supply analysis Is an extensive survey of residential developments, including for -oale and !or -rent typos. Buyers and ranters will be profiled by ago, family statue, income, place of work, and previous reutdonco Housing product sizes and attention and TVictoria willabe are studied in dot&il TAiO analysis will extend beyond the CSty'o border to include a rev dePOntannittardtiother past and proposed, in Ontario, Upland oast and west valley growth areas. 2 General Plan and DevslaOmant Surds• The a;cisting ODROral Plan will be reviewed Sth opocial emphasis upon the basic development otandarda. Rancho cucamonga'a General Plan will surroundings area, ouchwashOntario of z Fontanaa and in the Uplad, - 1 - ^„e /5-/ 3 Trend Analysis. The key indicators or housing market performance will be placed in a temporal perspective. Today's first time buyer market will be compared with the same market segment tan years ago The sales of single family dwellings with lot sizes less than 0,000 square feet will be given spacial attention Damographlc analysis and housing demand projections will tie prepared 4 Fquilibrium. This is the creative problem- nolving portion of the study The "what ifs" of changing minlmum lot and unit sizes are examined from a planning and community standpoint, as wall as a building Industry and financial perspective. The Impacts of increasing lot aizos and minimum unit sizes is evaluated In terms of economic feasibility, sales prices and rental rates, and growth of the community , The future of housing sales to Rancho Cucamonga will be compared with trends in the building industry, trends in the marketplace, and alternative mothous of land use plaanlna and product design The future rarket can be projected along with alternative market oegmvnt capture by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We will determine the location of areas within Rancho Cucamonga which would be iepa,ted If lot and unit eizos were Increased We will also provide general observations of potential Impacts that would result (I a land use Incompatibilities, changes In demographics, traffic and public facilities impacts) E. SCHEDULE AND COST This study c..an be completed with dellvary of a report 45 days from Ito initiation. A workshop session can be hold 21 days after project Initiation to discuss work In process. The total budget for this project 1s $14,900 The Geodkln Group will receive $9,900 and Austin Hanson Pohlman, a subcontractor of the Coodkin Group, will receive 05,000 A deposit of one -third of the contracted amount 1s due upon aecentance of this proposal An additional one -third Is duo at the time of the workshop session. The final one -third Is duo upon presentation of the final report. - 4 - ., Ado The breakdown of the total budget Is as follows: Employee Hours Rate Total Errol Cowan 20 $ 60 $ 1.200 David Adlard e0 $ 50 6 61000 J111 Krantz 80 $ 26 $ 2,100 Subtotal 160 $ 7,300 Overhead Factor... ..1 35% TOTAL OOODKIN BUDGET $ 91900 AUSTIN HANSEN PERLMAN BUDGET $ 51000 TOTAL BUDGET FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT $16,900 S_REP ER =NCES The Goodkir. arou 1 San Diego City School District: We prepared market, feasibility, and highest and boat use analyses on behalf of t•,o existing school eltes Recommandatlono included alternate devolopment /redevelopment and disposition strateglus with extensive financial modeling on various development alternative$ (December, 1986) Reference: Mr J V Ward, Director of Property Management, San Diego city School District 2 National city School District: We prepared market, feasibility, highest and beat uae and financial analyses on behalf of the administrative office Oita of the National City School District (April, lose). Reference: Me Marcelo Bee, Business Manager, National City School District. 3. City of Loo Angeles, California: We prepared a feasibility analysis on behalf of a 750,000 square foot shopping area in the center of Loo Angeles This reoul,ed in - 6 - 40/ complete rehabilitation of a shopping district (1979). a City of Albuquerque, Now Mexico: we prepared a comprehensive rehabilitation plan and marketing program for the Central Business District on behalf of the City (1977) 6, City of Bedford, ohio: we prepared a market analysis and redevelopment strategy on behalf of the City of Bedford, ohlo The reeommendatlnns detailed the formation of a redevelopment agency, short and long term phasing strategy, and implementation plan for the city's downtown Central Business District .rculation and parking were addressed, as wall as otnor public funded lAprovemouts in terms of economic feaalbility and likely affect on stimulation of private investment (July, 1986) Reference: Mr Arthur V Dickard, City Manager Austin Hanson Pehlman D1OUb Mr Larry ClGmens v ce President HPI DOVOlopment Co 7;07 E1 Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 636 -0907 mr Jon Briggs vice Provident Sammis Properties 2680 Camino Dal Rio North, 0100 San Diego, CA 92108 ('19) 298 -7112 3 Mr Michael Hol2millor Planning Director Planning Department City of Carlsbad 2076 Lab Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 638 -1161 - 6 - /� 0. AUTHORIZATION This proposal ohall be valid for a period of ninety (90) days from the above date. THE OCOpf1t1P i N Z. lnoton Elton PresIdaur— -- —" 7 l (e3 The female eucalyptus longhorn barer, a pollen 1u.ar. doesn't teed an eweehpmr Uut Isvr 199. on 11168W or mabtwe. LUGS San UaM The larvae feed on Lie Inner bank and cambium and eon a91 even h.-My suuypnu User. Beetle from Australia threatens eucalyptus Glann T ScrNnn O Eldon L Reaves 0 Robert F. Luck Spreading rapidly in southern California Slake the euculypt= longhorn borer we, discovered la October 1911; Westing eucalyptus trees near El Toro, Ca4famla, It ha been spmadL•Ig mpidly W the south. ern pan of the stile Subsequect srsveys (February 1986) bysWte and Cocnty Agra- 60 have found the be., • along the coat from Lang Bead W San Diego and ind"d W van Nuys amt time., aolypto L •. been planted W Call- fntan ante Lte .860s but bra beta free cf tmlla, the MUrO home of CUCalypt= In Australia. Lids beetle oceura Ibsvughout eucalypt= fOML% but its damage Is usu- ally retracted-to dead and dying trrs During severe dmugbu, beetle outbreaks may Occur, but ins populations normally appear W be limited by a complrs of cal. Ural enemlea. Laeludng predators and para.,lWids F=alypt= ha also bem planted it eereral abet countries, ncludtog IuaeL Morocco, Span, and South Africa, where the woad is used for lumber, paper pulp, telephone poles, mice supporq and fuel. The eucalyptus longhorn borer has been accidentally Introduced Iota many of these countries, and b killing lace, and severely damaging lop Intended far s'JeCtanl timber and lelephoe polo One of the Lme common broadleaf tree, n orWn CjU(onda. tacelypl= b Potentially threatened by the beetle in g caLlronMa acnxalwne Anxwousr see /60 T la.u'scape and weadlot plantings, espy dally when subjected W pence mou• turn strew Such stteq even for brief pen tads. Incme vulnerability W attack In MOLrt "glans of Africa (totem Nabs- vaaL raudali 51 inches per year, add Na• tat, mWfaU 811 Who per year), the beetle is reported to have killed apparently healthy trees dutng brief moisture strew Trop s4scoptibiliCj The b etle is a strong flyer and bas been known W attack lWated trees alma mile, fmm the dearest nfated tree. The female usually lays egga on d1maced or molslureduessed trees ear an fres'dy cut Icgs Eggs may be laid on the bark of welfwatered healthy trees, but most of the newly merged larvae die when they attempt to penetrate the bark Healthy trees respond W larval baring by product Lag copious quaaUtle, of gum that smath. In anbrigated woodWLs, name faces are under mom molslure stress than oth- M ftn" symptoms Include Sprouting of Well" bud., an the laY bole and cl angea In 1121 color. The leaves of such torn viewed through a No. a yellow pbcW graphic filter appear much fighter than D,me an healthy Veen The beetle, repeat. edit' lay eggs on such Irma and avoid neighboring healthy Utes Lary» that survive the Ime's initial gum dettnsts and reach the ca—Morn mail" Weir feeding W a UsNter %a, fonnLig a Ieslon. The beetle, cootnae W r t . iw 4� •� 5`4i jjR • ' �., Gti� �f� �.. � +1 • ii-�: ,l � r - „ ft ^J U.V l � f /J�,�,'=i1) y : � s'�YM�y • �'i+c rY. � � Y' .P K - ~'Ei � f t qtr t #�' N' , � it )� �fr+. • �.:. -�. i�Y.1[ A`4 ,� t � ° �� ,y�4M� LK��J• �:•, � yv��<• � f ,y t�r'C � � Ft �e.�J��.k . ' ,:b�y��'�" ; r � ?.• ii '� , Y'_.. 54'! 94'1' •�.' a"' 3.i... form a papal ehambet The tuhaci near the back surface will provide tba exit for the emerging adult beetle Llmae develop La about 70 days in Irah lop and up to 180 days to drY lag% The pupal auto la,U about 20 days Our - ingthe spring old -w ". the beetle qwm three 10 loll[ months to complew its IUe cycle but in the fall and winters- It may require up to aim mwoths. Two to then genmtiom per year Occur to 'did - terraces, cIL=taw similar to that of Cats- rosm , Chemical control meaaurea thing euulyptes tree are not easily protected by patkides glace the beetles' behavior ltmlts their tsposue m the chemluia The beetles bide during the day under loose back and do rot feed 00 lava or Pick. Taeadalts :re acUM Irom February to November, and wit wrrUd be necessary to coo pesttada with long R eidml activity err freptAt appUaU= m kill adults uadlng an the Um Also, "ales ruble egn car be Laid an sprayed 11ea before the poneide an kill the female beetle, ktWg • adult wood nor zte "lily pmmt ."cation of a susceptible ten Eggs am usually protected Iran espy sum m pesucidm be cm they are Laid order lay" of loose Wet Orco the lac, vie an Inside the bark they Maps path tide appliaucna The IaClerm cost of "Dated Appio cations to large mulypins tram also uema economically Impractical. Dic; :bk+lde Injections; LAW rot lap Yell the Urn, and p"rmt Ideslatiod, but the procedure u stow ad aperal if of the Part oh !tiled lop can also Pee' vent Incaution, but labor Coats Par. P11, vented its adoption in rnrat Wasted areas yaveenating theeterms Unm developing In Mt lop stored fa 1'le As B"waud The typo of consultant sad dmtn regaU^.d have hot yet bra determined Covering ualnfuted rot lop With stcdy t2rpauUm could protect thou from bens attack- 1, Spain frnWy rot tnp lcgf. with 2 percent Ilndnk a Fm 0 .c ! N WoadloU to attract adult beetle• 71e bee ties laid eggs On see sprayed icy and then did from mnincc with Lie pesddde The logs were "placed every two wrk, with fresh ones, and the old lop were de, strayed within two maths to prevent bee ale emergence Up to 100 egg insists were laid on ace log ad about 1.040 dud adults were found nearby Than mea- wares apparently Ilmued the Impact at the beetle in same woodloss Blologleol control Sevmi predators and pwatittl cep• pear to cause significant mrcvulity to bee tie lance In Awtrollan aulYOmf for esu Tao bramncd palwles, Syngufer lrpldus Orulle ad FneoO eayntor F, a" common u DeeUcencated lap. Also, two p"damry brella. the lend 7roto- elm 1.+ Walum Scly ad ■colt'• dUd. Bothrldan rlUala NeWea. my came substantial mortality of beetle lac, via In "t lop at acme coca. In moist areas, the Input Uraa"r0 WnIJ" g CWapAklaamllNUWa .AIkr.A000,rl9ee /0 / (Ba11arnol alucks ail ac= • saga of the becue. In twat] the Synge woodpecker causes about Ye percent of the 13"31 mar Lauty oaortu'L an the bar! fa Sale Afn• M mlanuaum of Srg2.kr IepMUS w•a apparently ruceenlul, altkmp no follava- up tvalwl.on is amilable. In 0,M.Se County. we have seen some woodpecker aaiWty a Injected beef. but It appears to be of min,, UoparWce- We have also observed the Mastery mite Pyamola cep kuboe tr :Us eggs no sortw trees To asses whether naum psra.Umida have adapted to the bath to C21110131 , we collated "posed Lap from ales near Corona, Redid ds. and Limit and placed them In raring mambas We �mred bate ad pith atOld emergence we have remrc id two pareitWA Xor Ida hmntrahs (Say) and AWYMIUS slm- pl" (pawn} Bab paranulds ocmr on Use ea rive caamhicid hectic XylOtracbuf MuU= which was alw preset La the amply lags We have m evidence that any of the Am1"ltan paramaidt err pred- awn are present to (711form3 . Conclusion Doulyptm trees am web adapted to QBfomla,s Medli mi ao cUmate and for mere, year: have been eta of malor vary. Coescquettiy, several varieties have become Unpsct m Uicd upe plants and have also boa excessively iced In windbreak and 100110t pLaOUap. Now than rientinp are threatened by the eta- "lyptm loothost harry. which Is "Pablo of reproducing to living eu"IYN's ryas Cut Was td k,pp Weed for firewood are a wjor auroras ^.' bectlas Odd sad dying wen w-' nod by the babel feeding pramt a public danger. and their remov al ad repuammt will he espea.ive Mace cAtauol matrail wi.a pestfeldes appears ImpractluL alrym.tive mea- wa and to be coesidaei BaU�pw LUaos a an be ]]tented ty pr of Initiated of dad free, and WO m alypla wood Using peautldeaated trap logs w attract and destroy adult bet, tin way reduce their eombas but we M uncertain about the detra of "111101 likely. Establtshmmt of puauw]ds that attack the bads larvae and precdaton that feed on Its clip may be a long•lem ulaUos Limiting the Impact of the beeW on euulypm to CaUfarca wits probable require the mordlaited me of than mea shin an o commesiltywlde buts. pm T .germ Y ssaff Rawwe AswNN P a,.y.memett w nwwao. tY vviv, d cbf 1V.veeafe tale. L Anre Y tao-.1al" M. cep, civet ppmwar N Apeeaww 3aa Mae /. sate Y".4 Rrlaow O"aeewoe0 �� fAarw°.rult�.�Yi:Yativrwprs Ma ICAtYou YdM1 r�� IIWIZ Mt �4+ V DA/� 116 DESCRIPtlO%S A.ND BIONOMICS OF THE Ia131ATUXI STAGES U.oloyy. Damage to Citrus by this species is the result of careless pruning, the untrimmed ends attracting the ovipositing femme. The young larvae remain inside these deed ends until the latter are entirely hollowed out. They then descend into the Gang wood, thus wakening the bud. Atlerenre Chtttenden, 1898 0 09. Biol.). Pbonanlhs semirunctala (Fabrtcius) Qa!adm do [as Ec-atiptos) Distrrbudon. nMorlCAL UGWN: South America (Argentina, Cldle, Uruguay), M10VIAN aidmv South Africa (Cape Province, Orange Free State, Pretoria). HAGAGAaCAN MGM %: Mauritius, ltadtlguee. PAtAEARRIc "atom Egypt. Palestine. AL's - T LASUN Armow Australia, New Zealand. This species is of Austnliea nriein, but has become widely distributed through mmmeree and Is tram, eswbGshed in New Zealand, South Africa and South America. Host plants: £uml}pluer spp., especially L. globulus and E. rindnaltr; It has also been recorded from E. long1folla, E. robuila, 4T E. saligra, E. dlrerstrolier. E. sldrroayfon, E. I fesror3lon. E. rmubrlr. E. lereitrorrls, E. ..,'. �;1 "• Wantho and E. crrbra (Tooke, 1935a). In Israel It attacks E. mnraldulensir (B)ttmkl. Satz and Ncumark. 1933), and in South I America E. rtndnalla (Bosq, 1940) and E. glabulus (Molinari, 1923). Adult (fig. 73). Entirely reddish brown except clytra, which have a stow <oloured, transverse, median-band and an apical spot. ffead with aatennil segments 3 -7 strongly spired apically on inns. angle; extending [m. to ar least as fer as elytnl apices in female, and well bc)onw apices In male. Eyes Flt. 73. rA7nu.rhr u.+e.wnua coarsely faceted. Prorhoraa slightly elongate, lFeemwl Adwt. with sides beating a pair of median spine -like tubercles. Middle mail cavities cloud externally E13tra sery coamll, punctured fat basil half• apical half smooth: apices with outer and sutural angles strongly spired. Length 16-30 mm. 3fature larra (Og 74) Form robust and rather strongly depressed. Head slightly transverse (maximum had -width 66 mm.). Ten plea (01. 74) with broad fermSinaus band botund amenna rather protu;scrant and hisected by a well- defined venicil Impression on rich side of wheh arc one or two staliower impressions. Mouthframe broadly pitchy Labrum umicimutar. One pair of melt[ present halm ad and sentrad of antenna; Icas urge, osxl, pigmented spot indistinct. Hypostoma form - ;noes, with %U. a T La ) NJ vcr no NI ch. ma at% 1 'aT'- �•a)lTC: T!^^ ^t �.'�•r.^sra•cs++' '4 5 __� ._.^ -..•.. . ir. � pa wb E)s bes late g1a Ing wir tub ctg' fee STu fire a4 PIT Nt Set felt star bn t � � y ( •t.. g• rl a•� Y L. -S • F� :r+ fS JJ `��- •: R � -� tire...» t� the ss:de a the clay). ada). Suet. A%11- Ind. rigin. ough New M :ially also •11114. n. E. E. In nski• ouch d E. town used, spot. aagly tdinq Vale. Eyes talc, ,like :used p1 -es ghtty sous satin ltnd with �f• 19 PROP— CANTHI \I 1:7 from margn more darkly so, and very feebly tnnvvencly striate, gular sutures strongy raised. Maxilla with ugmcnt 3 of palp rylindnetl, a long as segment 2. Labial palpt with segment 2 cylindrical, as long at segment 1 Piodocar with conspi• euous scattered. dark, gtabrous spou on lateral regions, pos'eru.r part of ptonatum very finely longitudinally striate. Abdomen with ampullae mrero-mirculate, glabrous, nemmberculae. Legs with unguleulut slender. flagelldorm and smbneately tuber. culate Spirar @s with penrreme oval, thin. pale• trstaeeous. without marginal chamb :n and not nt.cd above general level of cuticle. Length up to 32 mm: mavrmum breadth (at plothoma) 105 mm Pupa. Nrad with vents doma•sh3ped. smooth. glabrous and panly visible from abmc; front feebly ri.gou, gabrous. Anttnnsr wish segments 3-6 (at Itavo strongly �. :giA rya ,.. p T F;t 7e ?AOewwrAe uM/mrura rFabrk;un. %hews nitre. Temple 1.311,,it :r pectinate at apex of inner margin, extending to between abdominal segments 3 and 4, where they are strongly meurved to terminate between the middle and front cosae. E)cs feebly convex, glabrous. Pronorum quadrate, with front margin feebly rounded; baring scattered, short. curved, testaaoue spines, npeaally around front angles. lateral tubercles acute and strongly produced. Aftsonoturn transversely striate, glabrous; seutellum slightly protuberant and glabrous. Ayetanor.,m smooth and beat Ing a few minute spiocs on each side of seutellar groan, which is distiact. Elytra and wings extending as far as abdominal segment 4, the former with an apical spine -like tubercle. Abdomen with targi:es I-6 tack with paired oval areas bearing about sm to eight short stout spines. Tergite 7 elongate, with a pair of oval tubercles each baring four to six stouter spitin which arc inclined anttriorly. Tergite S elongate, with two groups of about four or more slender opines which am loelfned postnorly Tergtie 9 extremely short, bearing a few short stout spines. Srernites glabrous. Legs with remon davan; bind remora with a lubarculate process time ban; extending to abdominal segment 5. Flmatfonal tpfeorles present on abdominal segments ) -5; pentreme broadly oval, moderately thick and s:tghtly raised above general Ind of ande. Length up to 15 mm.; maximum breadth C mm. Egg. Form elongate, subcylinddel, spindlc-shaped. Chorion pale yellow, soft, gelatinous. Lragth 26 mm (ruoke, 19353). Bf�olo v. Oviposuion takes pine on dead n..,,klX treys and cut l4as. csr gcillu fc Tied umber wi-h the bark on. The cm are dcpoutcd beneath the thin strips of dry bark wh•c are oose y nTed to the smooth Scroll bark of the holes and main bnnchr_ The;nabmion period is from ten to fourteen days. The larvae feed for ���e3, tT5nR ^a:''i�''��i�R'F"'!Tnt%r,��_w •.. -- .rKr -^ 121 DESCRIPf14h3 AND OIOhOxsICS OF THE LNNATe RE STAGES Y •fat about four to six months subeoreKally, making regular galleries which arc packed 1< ? beer lightly .,Ih rmss, these may tither catend for several feet in a straight face or twist Ica% and turn In all directions When mature, the lanae bore obliquely Into the wood, �`• where they pupate at a dtpth Of several mohes from the surfa= The pupal period }f'` lase about ten days. Em -rgcnw (n South Africa) mum from September to April F, (I fi (Tooke. 19)52) Aemrdmg to Lepome (1950) many flnt•imtar lariat are killed by f (Bic the copious Bow of °gum' Y Bic[ The habits of this species to Palatine, as recorded by B)tinskl•Salz and Neumul bun (1953). hose been snmmtristd as 1`011OWL The beetles are thiefly active dunng the Neu night. had ng in daytime under this bark or In errncn. Life span of the adult is about (L f 40 days to summer and up to 130 deys dunng the tanker season. Owposition occurs pracrially ur interruptedly from Mamh to Normber and eggs a• • deposited in batches Of 10 to 110 (ascmgt 43.5) The maximum number of epgs ta-d by a angle mrtne female was about 300. Clot Prnlarors. mm� ur, anTrnmorhtlio nrinhrl1 I Ratter (De Santis, 1945), Economic IMParraner P rtmlPuraara (Fabnnus) aft -n causes considerable J damage to sickly tries, irrespective of sit, and felled timber but dry wood, nnn with the bark Intact. Is not attacked (Duffy, 1953,1). It is inserestmg to ro!c that, atzsnling to Bytimkf•Sala and Neumark (I.e,), standing living rates ate attacked and often completely girdled in Palatine. Trees up r to tuclve )cars old usually succumb to attack owing 10 the complete des:rucuon of the 1 cambium and phloem, but older trees, which arc not entirely girdled, may survive the primary attack, but arc wtakened and therefore attacked with preference by later to tr generations stroi Brain (1929) suggon that this species was probably Introduced In Africa m wooden sleepers from ALstralta about 1396. It was fin: found about 1900 to blue gum trees coll. growing along a nilway line near Cape Town, Lounsbury (1913) states that it has - L been transported far and wide throughout the Union by traffic of Euc rhprur logs which are used as mine props. A. J. E Onoa his Informed the author that tl s,meet Is a serious pest of Eucol)plw in Mauritius. L Introduced tries of EurOljprret species, opceially E. alohulw, growing In parks J and other open places In the Argentine base been infested by this species in the past (Moiinsn. 1923), •. Control. Tooke Il.c.) suggests the placing of trap trees (trees of little economic value) in clearing, dunng the emergence period- these should subsequently be burned L Stripping the bark off trees as soon as they are felled and allowing the timber to dry Pon out as soon as possible discourages odpoation. I An effeeuve method of protecting Ecral)Prw polo against attack by this speetes 1942 has been described by NcumarL° (1953). It consists or the impregnation, immediately J after felling, by injecting an aqueous solution of zinc chloride into the sapwood under (Blo A pressure of 5 atmosphcro by capping one end of the cut pole. At Out pressure the speed of flow avtragn I lure per 102 seconds to polo 6.5 -20-3 feet long and containing L 04-4 3 cubm fates of sapwood PhorommrAa lame were found not to enter the barl, I or used of polo containing 04 lb. zinc chloride per cubic fool sapwood, and it has J PIIORACA %THIN 1:9' asked been shown that pain containing 1 Ili per cubic foot should ha,z an average Ide of at twist least twenty-two yeah. wood. .%fatetolitudied.3Ll P,II,Orange Rocr Cnleny,from EuraAprw.in soli B. h! seriod Arfnrncez. Brain, 1929 (Biel.); Bosq. 1934 (Meal 1. 1940 (81011. Brush. 1918 April (I fig., Biel I. Bytiml!•Salz, 1952 (Biol.. Come ). Byunskl•S.Q and Neumark. 1953 led by (Biol., Comr)., De Santis. 1965 (L fig . P flg Brat fig., Conte 1. Duffy, 1953a (E. L. P. Biel . Conte.), 1957 (E L gg.. P. I fig., Blot Conte I. Lepetme, 1950 t111o1). Lount• i6rk bury, 1918 (L fit., S fig.. Biel. fit.): Molinut. 1923 (Biol ). %Wlilmann 1954 1 8101 I. ng the Neumark, 199 (BioL, Conte): Schiadte, 1876 (L); Tooke, 19]8 (Biel Corte) 1935a about (L fig., Btol., Conga), 1949 (D1cl ). Occurs arches Orion pntaganus Guerin• \IEnes 1110 mpthe DUtrlbut(an, NTMO CAL 91GION: South America (Argentina. Beh,1a, Brazil. Chile. Urugwy). tinbelli Host plant: Robmlo ptrud•ararla (Reed. 1912). Aefnr,lres. Bosq, 19422 (HrA ): Reed. 1912 C) ferablc A with Spbaertonfai Prolmphatelon ursulare (While) Dprrlbuoan. NLLTrtorjcet uetoN• Caribbean (Jan,mca) eel up orthe Host plant Angr It. h¢ the hfarwr lara. lame labelled as being probably this spears appear w be identical Y lathe to those or Elophldion nanwn (Fabrielus), and cannot be separated in the key It 1s strongly suspected that they an in fact large of E nanwn (Fabncius). bodes %faterfal ioudied. 12 L Jamaica. 9.v.1945. from under bark of Anitrlt %nod, in n trees Boll. U.S.N.M. !e has Reference. None a.ailable. a togs Amtwnus electas (Gahaa) t lnscct Distribution. Naoilto!1CA1 umu.. South Ardmw (Brazil). parks References. Hayford, 1950 (P, Biol .); Duffy, 19532 (Bic] I. se past Trl:hopbortn tnterrngatlonls Blanchard •nomte Disidbutlon. HeOeaoyb:AL ■aOION South America (Argentina, Bolula, H:azil. - uracd. Parog• ty). to dry Host plants: Asada di:urrenr moUOaooa (Andre ie, 19:8), Pfprodmla (Bosq, 19422). species; Rrferencer. Andrade, 19:8 (Blot.); Bosq, 19424 (Biol.); Lima, 1930 (Biel.), 1955 Jiately - (11101.). I under _ Tt(chapbarus Ilrgus (Germad ore the 1: wng _ DLV(butlon. %=RoetuL uetON South America (Argentina, Bruit). o bark Host plant: Acacia dtewrnu molhnwla (Andrade, 1928). ! it bas u `; Rrferrners. Andrade, !928 (Bic] ); Lima, 1930 (Dial). MS (Biol.). 1 1-20 722 �q,. T tS{a4'�• V yi �""y f" Y T•. _�M ~w�'.lF f' r •" r '7 �, S, i.p<�'iT£�'r,.�, , o-i;.� \..a^!E• 9 .' `, i%Ja =t!_•� .. :3L.:Jia..T..ta9 7t r. a � •r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: U- cenber 3, 1986 TO: Ma,-or and Members of the City Council PROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager gUBJSCi: 87AY08 REPORT OF PROPUSLO COOM7T ,I RECOKKE PS7I11M It to recoamoaded tbat the City Council not take nay action concerning the proposed County Jail at this tine. We expect that action will bt appropriate within the neat month. It is our uaderatending that our newly seated Supervisor is working to resolve the problem tt the aaiisfactioa of both the City of Reecho Cucamonga and the Co.mty. IXW /dja CITY OF RANCHO CUCMfONGA MEMORANDIM DATE: December 3, 1986 TO: Hayor sad Menbors of City Council FROM: Lauren M. Aaaaernsa, Citv Manager SUBJECT: CIT4 CODg_ CIL 0MITTgg APPOINT"n Attached is a lfating of all current City Council cutrtittees and subcoeaitiees far your rev jam, Appointments to these committees will be considered at the December 3, 1986 City Council meeting, If you have any questions or free a ra In ter[ me. ra tter, coucaras regarding this please feel IJUI /kep Attachment —12a— gg �•� .:. r •`P,tii CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T � Y s r Lvn CITE' COUNCIL COMMITTEE mmt SUBCOMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS DECEMBER; 1956 73 a 300711229 CALIDOn1Lb ASSOCIATID CO►El9M NTS Foaction: Regional plannt.a organisation chat reviews matters of interest to als artas within Southern California. The issues include pawning issues, land use, hoaxing and air Quality. A eouncLimember who bat an interest in regional placniag matters should be appointed. These are normally evening r meetings in the Lot Angeles•Dovntosn area. CDR UT RECOMMIMI)MOlt member: Mikels Continue Altormatac Ring 9W ATM MMUXTS: !:ember[ Alternate: IILA" 1S1'IRE LUM 07 CALMRRIA CITW ranctiont To review legislative issues within the state and Inland Empire region. Semi woutbl, meetings with all cities of Ran Bernardino and Riverside counties at various locations in the Inland Empire CURII9T RSCONTAXA TION: Membar: All City Council Mm:.ars Continue Aitetvate: WVV AMIUMMISt N"bar: ___ Aitenutm: 77 -2- r M" I FLOG!) Yamctim: To rev lev drainage concern within the ar Looks a, methods to alleviate flooding, cs . The Mayor is au ezofficlo member of the committee. • ierS H IIECC10QdD6IIG11: Ambber: Augoet Continue Altetru¢e: [Log AW IfPCl> nmest Aemberi Altercate: 'LLDr VrV MLICIPUTAlg CDALISI® 7mactieat To provide a coordinated effort of the public and private sectors in developing needed Clout on Issues of area -vide interest. The City appoim:s a member, tht Chamber of Comaerec appoints a member• and the City and Chamber of Commerce together appoint a amber (currently -Lovell Comes). CURIEST Nembrs xxmwHI WYI09: dlt"naV so" Continue AIV ]murn 73: Aeau'er: Altmrmte: __,_ -3- 7,5- O WERM PM INTAMS :osctioms TO attend Chamber Hoard meetings as the City's representative. Nests second WUaesday monthly, 7:30 a.m. member: RACMEMWurrON: Altervt -- Continue lcerma t Nb7 APPOINMEN2N: Nembert Alternate: Utjf L- i A action: To review bills scheduled to be paid la the past, see City COUIIeil member. have been appointed to this Committee to allow tbea an opportunity to become more aegmainted with the City's tisul policies and procedures. membae RECOWMA1T_.]B: Nabors Wright Al tmrunWt Euquet Continue NEW APPOIND=3.97 Kosher: Alternates _;. 17ro r SOLID 9ASId WAAWMT Function: Euviev issues related to solid vaste management in the City and vest valley, including the vaste to energy progress, refuse hauling permits to operators, and rate adjusteear. COYIIDT RICONOISDGTIOY t Membert gone Establish Alternate[ None BEN AMINV.IDSEt Member: Altarmare t Function: Heeto Subcommittee to Ordinance No. 294. "URRZMT Mombert none Altsreatat none ASVISOLF COMSEIOg quarterly rich Advisory Commission discuss vork program so established in M AFFOIgI% TS: Mambert Alternate[ 07 RzcmgSuxDDATI® t Establish SAIL 1105300 '0wa7T X Inaction: To enforce policija regarding the Meat End Soit Erosion Control Ordinance. this is a county co®ittes. •. C011AT artOm O "rION: Ke.ber: Wright none j Alternate: Duquet I ad: 1110 ApfOmn=TS Me"ar: -_ Altersatot COEMOMM IOCODATI05 SOEOOMCMEKe Traction: leviev selection process fur Board of Directors and to formulate goals and direction. CO2LQT 1.BX41O051DAT305: mcm6sr3 Dahl Continuo Altarmatet Buquet O19 APPOlen=rS: Membert __ Altetuttet — /�6 -6- nao moans BMIMAID SUKCMMITTKZ Fwaeeiom: To recommend appointment to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Ad Hoe Committee. Project ccepleted. CURRENT RICOWARIUMON: ' Reuther: King Eliminate Alternate: Wright REU APPOINUMTS: Alatnate: RWSIRC 91T ARM "MAN SUICRKQTLS (RCA Fanctiw: To vo:k with staff in reviewing proposals for eo.sisg Set Aside Program and make recemrrmdat:ens to RDA and City Council. CuvMT RKCV3dVMTIO9: UoMr: Mikels Contiuue Alternate: King fm AMINMMTSt Al to"s -a: -7- I;! CiTt S /LKC' OR COWNITTM foaetloe: Tc fill vt,can :ea to County son S �e orRtaitstiow 'tas[ings noresll• nrhed'"d in Coejnnction miCh SMSM mteting+. ' CUet1D1T 111.41)a99ATloe: " Members Ns or /Ns or "s de,ni p 7 7 Knee as nQnired c, utlow Alternator SKY A"01212MtfSt %embers Altsrnnto: _ ZQDLMRI11 Tung Pwetiom: Yo review rue developments for provision of trails coming before the Planning Coomissioo. CUiSIIT /"LON ®DMOIF: Member Dahl Done Altermetm: King mm A"OENT®CTSt Members Alternate: / So _g. C&HPAIGN MARCH SUICDNUTTZ6 rtmctiomt To Peet vitb Advisory Ccomission Subcommittee to review Advisory Caanissiot Campaign Piusacs issue. CDgPda2 gHCONdODMON: Nmber: Eugoet Combine with Newber: Wright Advisory Commission Subco nittee NEW AINTAMM73: N,s,hert Newhcr: NogILH Ho" k=T UTIEW ranctiomt To meet periodically with itobile Home Park owners sod residents in securing a vorkable rear stabilization solution. CDiIIIP EYWNMDATIM: Hembbrt Zia& None AIterastet Wright H® APIUDg7KZ5S!r Nembert llternatst /O c,,.. .. /meting To unite county goveraments, city governments, water agencies and the business noammity in an organisatic: that will assure an adequate, reliable water auppl for Southern California. CURRENT RECO.'dXMTXOX: Cember: Mikels None Al termate: Nis APP01113=78: Alteruta: PARK ACQD1Brn f P ®etion: To meet with the Community Services Director fnr City Council feedback during land acquisition negotiations. Committee was telpful daring heavy acquisition period. At this time, the Committee may no longer be necessary. Matters of this sort will be handled through the entire City Council CCRNEET REGC40MUND rICU: Membsr: ling Eliminate Altercate: Dsbl NN dPPO1NTNlZTN: Keuber: Alternate: —10- i- -action: To meat vitb Mr. Edvnoiski, vector control consultant, in regards to vector rcntr�l contract. Project has been ccnPlated. CUU MI Member: Euquat yy Members MIMDAIIDM: ISng Eliminate Mfil dtI0I2112=29c Member. PMaLIC SAJMICIII YA=17 p — VZCDWaT7]Z buildIoe design. re•iev P.blic Safety /City facility exterior buildin gn Project hu beta ecaPleted. CMLaI Members boquet !!a Member: Dahl 09s Eliminate Member: _ Membez i —11— Pooctioms TO rerl. t Arcbitactural plane and eats tiva ?rash ecut8ti oae. for review of Project has been completed. DDU= -r )`embers Dahl Me -ber: Proat Elimi� =yt��tQi ltember: Deabom: P41: f, COMCr Asa PCASIDCa 9' i>aoctiomi Yoo mast With om+laeioo 8obecmmi ties to ssue'. Adv4 ry t'o<saiaal000Cocle, Condon and rommunlatioua Project bq been rMPicted. CUU=r MmDez= sing n�r�,...��� Dahl atiml��y �Dws I'M AFftin Mra, ambers 74Wber: -15- :o '"arm P"wQ = >Orrlaca SUEC(YpII for a�tecs ec}a$e for SEDA Dbro�hur.. N+rke dug Public Pelatioue Project b+u boea cavple[ed. t"MT Nt°ber: Nlkele lbDcrs tint: ncl Eltofaate AIIV IPPOINUM'Ia: N�aber: _ r' —I]— =T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Decmber 3, 19E6 TO: Mayor and Mmbers of the City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager SUBJECT EXPIRATION OF TERMS FOR VARIOUS CI C 99I0DS RT.0010T OATIOM It is recosrdended that the City Council consider filling the vacancies irdicated below at the earliest opportunity. Sa k vo nd The terms of office for the folloviag Planning Cogm.iseioners expire it Decmbnr, 1986: Larry McNeil David Barker Peter Tolstoy Tema of the following Advisory Comzzission umbers also expire in December, 1966: Alta LorA Sharon Rooero Jazzes Bookbout Cucamonga San Grasso (vacant) George Leimaan XtivAndg Neil Westlotoro (vacant) On the Park Development Commission, the following teme expire in January, 1987: Peter Pitasei Leslie Riggs LMW /dja /O _" ~ 1;1'1'I Vr tiHiVl.ntl t.l��.runvivvn n4) MEMORANDUM f DATE: December 3, 1986 Vo 1977 TO: Mayor nod City Council PROM: Lauren M. Waseerman City Manager �( i SUBJECT Jail Information During the past three weeks, we have attempted to locate all of the background materials related to the proposed jail. The materials are frm City files as well as files obtained from the County Administrative Officer. 1'arginal notations and arrows were added by the staff to highlight certain infermaticm. We still have not received one document we requested from the County which out- lines how the various County Jail facilities are used. Thin information is extremely important to us since it will provide a better andoist+nding of Coun- ty policies. Some members of the City Council have asked us to verify that the funds re- served from recently approved bond issues for jail construction are "site spe- cific.' 'le have verified that the funds reserved for Sim Bernardino County are, in f.ct, site specific and must be used for the gaucho Cucamonga site or they will be returned to the State's funding pool for use by other jurisdic- clone A copy of Senate Dill 2W, Section 5 is attached for your inforration. The City knew in mid -1981 that the jail would be a pert of the total law and justice center It is also clear that the project as originally planned did not anticipate the phenomenal rote of growth we have ex etienced in the post five years. Thf etore, the larger jail may (frm the Co- .rty`s viewpoint) be neces- sary to se ve the population of the West End of our County It is significant to note tbet from as early as 1981, the County assured the City that the jail would be designed to look like an office building. And since that time, the County has reaffirmed its intention to design a secure, office -like jail which will fit in with other developments in the area. Memos prep -red by former Sheriff, Prank Bland, in March 1987 indicated a need for a 275,000 square foot, 579 bed jail to serve the West End by 19v7. In the Mayor and City Councii Decmber 3, 1966 Page 2 game memo, Sheriff Bland expressed a concern that if action were delayed, the County my face a confrontation with the public over the proposed lots tlor for the Rancho Cucamonga jail. Superviwor -elect Jon Mikels boo informed me on a confi ntial basis that be has been working with other Supervisors to consolidate the courts and to reduce the lice of th.• proposed Rancho Cucaaoaga jail. Br. Mikels' solution may be a "wim- win^ situation which will sane County taxpayers money while reducing the size of the jail in Rancho CacamovEs. Jon has also stated -bat it may be pos- sible to change visiting hours and the 'release point" oo it will rffor a nini- mum of inconvenience to the citizens and basiceszes in Rancho Cucamonga. RBCOMMRDDATIOB: It is our recommendation that the Council end staff postpone public diocmasims concerning the jail issue until Mr. Mikels hex been seated on December 1. Af- ter that date, we will schedule a meeting with mu new bnperviaor to ^officially° discuss the in ne. Mr. Mikels bee Indicated that he intends to aggressively pursue on option shich will be satisfactory to r?,* City isaediste- ly after be ass ®es office. LMW:baa attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGa MEMORANDUM IDATES July 1, 1986 TO. City Couotil and City Manager ,�A FRQfi Mark Lorimc, Adaioistrative Aoalyst' "--"'� SUBJECT, U kc rre;lpd iefetav -tide de Cbie �yntmt 9 {c• AeaeiH Cf nn 1 �iCA%Qr (P- 197- for the City Council's general information, et,(f has researched thr, file$ relative to what actions vary made beginning in August. 1981 cc the acquisition of the civic ceder /lm and justice tsetse site. The folloving outline[ the I cries of events vbicb took place Ic the acquisition of the civic center site. Copies of staff reports and cevapape: articles aro attached for yvur reference. Urn Amok August S, 1981 City Council approve@ laud sale agreement vitb the County of San Bernardino relative to the Civic Cacter /Law and Justice Cant" site. eoverber 18, 1981 City Council reviews two schematic alternatives for development of the Reecho Cucaro ga Civic Center Master Plan. both scheass out "mad the City Bell, Cultural Center, Lar and Justice Canter and County jail (pre -ttial detention facility). The City Council unaaimutly approved the revised site plan (alternative b). February 1, 1982 Planning Coadasion cavieved be two acbematic alternatives for developmnt of the Civic Center Aamter Plan. (INUwto .re,, : N) March 17, 1986 City Council uuauimusly approved revised land sale cgcasaeat with the County of Sam Bernardino relative to the Civic Center /Law and Justice Center sits. M J FT i CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STMT REPORT' July 71. 1901 T0: City Caumil FAOR: Lauron M. Wssanas. City Ikrmgsr SUiJECTi County -City Land Sala AeraecenY AS a condition to Wrchosfag the ewtfre 25.5 Acre rare@) for t1m Law and Jestice Center and the Civic Center, the County has ap'eed to sell to the City 7.6 aces for our use. The total coat of tM con4itic" btheCounty hasYitgreeeto•purchaiathe land endtttoo,resenancfat it 0 the City for ectwal test. The inclosed agreement spocifies that the City Fay 5760.000 to the County on Jan.sry 15, 1932 and an Adlltfonti 515p,S23.55 en or, be7oe January 16, 1963. In addition the City Agrees to pay one- t ^.le reportincidental o charpas fooraapprA�lseand title property acgsl -. sitio,,j negotiations. It is anticipated that the City share for this work will not exceed 5S,OW- RECOMMOATI0;1: It is rammandsd that tho City Coux11 approve the agraeeent with the County at? Sal, Qernardlno regsrding the purchase and $ale to the City of land fog the City -000nL Law And Justice Center and Civic Coater. Funds will M available to net the cos - eitsmnts As specified in thu Agr4amt. LMM /vs It in important to cobs# that the intea.led use of the pre- sentence holding facility is to house those iadividuals which ere awaiting trial. As indicated by the County, one important motivation for locotiag the holding facility at the Rancho Cucamonga site is to provide tunnel access between the I" and Justice Center and the Folding facility in order to transport prisoners within the molt secure of situations. Without the direct tunnel access between the two facilities, prisoners would be transported by vehiclo, thus presenting a greater risk of escape and a greater haccrd to safety within the community. In the avant the Municipal Courts are located at the I" sad Sustice Center, those arrested and booted in Rancho Cucamonga and the surrouadieg communities would be kept within the confines of auicum security and aouid not be subject to vehicle transport from the court facility to the prrsanweca holding facility. Should the Council wish additional information regarding this matter, plasma do not hesitate to eont,aa as. 14TER-FFICE MEND 4 141VAC . ` � DATE July 28, 1801 l aay*Jr F90M THOMAS B. SHARPE PHONE 3323 n . Senior Right of Way AgeAt "� /• 70 JORN MICHAELSON Administrative Analyst SUBJECT VEST VALLEY LAW AND JUSTICE CENTER - CUCAMONGA Listed as follows is a breakdown of anticipated costa to be incurred for tSa acquisition of land for the subjact property. a. Labor charges Administration, appraisal L negotiations $3,200.00 b. Escrow feet 450.00 c. Title insurance 8,038.50 d. Title report 100.00 APPROXIMATE GUST $8,788.50 TBS bct cc: Jr-3os L. Matthews e L Y2 ` t� Jgg �Mi�iLLl74lAw AM. 1 /)7 i .s` COUM-ClTy LAEO SALE AGl1XDiCNT 0 dated r 1481. ifC -) THIS AGaDII7Y7f7' a wnr.aul a ancy the COUNTY OY SAX DD3DAAU9jWf a g organized a ITY F CtpoCuUlltL 4 (.CITY,), a 'oasral law city and ttITpEEBLS:g e pgtRW, the Coati =, a body coats and politic. ho CiVf intends to btcame tltr owner of eertain real r•.roperty loosaatod ithin orrlaws, lLmite of CITY consisting of n ur ibit -,%; mote particularly described Sa Ey;lbit A attached hezetq and mafle a part herfoLl and the .Mh4Y has deteroiaed to sell tohethees� , 9.58 acres off the property described in %jesit -.%- x to the CITY gar the davelopufnt of ificsllyyiinwE04bita'D�ita attached Civic Center dfaeaibed 1,090 apac hereto and made a Part hereof (- fITE')) and is y[VDEAS, tree COUNTY with •the Coeoutcxana1a i pttsao`tC'iL'Y the of the opinion that the SITE should W by the UOD of Coeprehenf l'e Civsa Can of the CITY by thu epolieca lie iaoilitiee such as a City Eullr •olieo Daildinq, certain Ph ether with parting Lacilitiefr Walks. sad and Cultural Center, tog this Agreemsnt. other appurtenant faailieies as aontex8latsd by Now, ToxyXFODE, in consideration of the Payment of i914,323.SSr Plus costs in excess of direct land oasts, and the per2�irnmeo of the avtual proseifes and a4roswnts herein erontalnedr thr, parties hereto agree a0 follow" SLCTIOY 1. Tramises. The COUNTY hereby agx"' t0 dell and the CITY ia 7uth1blt `A', agrace to buy the SITE, more speoiLieally d 99tLbed rights-Of- Object to any cond!tionsr rfesrVAtiaLn, b crytiaax and rightsbelc way which may be Of record, after review by CITY as swt forth below. The which M hereto oath acknowledge thst aCyuinition by the COUNTY of the real hereto described in Exnibit to- °sellathou8iTr to the precedent to the obligation o_ the COUNTY CITY. SECTION 3 Ownrrthipt possession. The COUNTY Covenants that it in *.ands to hecoma the Owner of the real Property described in Exhibit 'A- harsof and the COUNTY -1- Shill sell to the CITY 7.38 acme, plus or rime the total Acrr t deecribad in Exhibit "A" BELTION I. ps;rchssc Pr1cw st:.9 ywt]sod of Pa nt• The COUttPY at Jesse to sell said Property and CITY agrais t purchase the BITE aB follows$ The CITY cball Pay a Pure" se price of $919,33ia55 Plus costs in exceas at direct land costs fcr the BITE, Pay to the COUNTY of 3M BSAEa><D xo as follows$ (a) The a= of $730,000 to be paid by check to the ord of CJOt7I` --, to be delivered on or before January 13, 1983, an6 the paid by check•to3the order aat COUWrY,sto be drllvarsd onoora Word l of direct lend Jatuaxy 15, 1961. It CITY tailr o rsem�vicoln9iuteuy�atdaol total said amount, as agaead, the port+ ?919.1:1.53 plus Coate in axesse of direct land coat* ah fnllsu_ia gagable from CITY a apportioftsiii of secured twee COUNTY, preparrd faction and Shall be aLds pay b7f the auditor - Controller's peysrtaent f."� curds depaCM r tt$ the Countv Treasurer -Tax Collector on behalf of buyer, CZTY Of pJ.NC8O CUCANON=. a receipt for seas will bO given by COOAt'Y to CITY, ant COON$: them to Provide the peed of Trust to the property so conveys (b Them* Costs sball lnoluda, but not be halted to tt followings Legal Fees, abstract of Title, Title Insurance, Est • Tess, Broker's .•,o=missiOs and Adoinixtrative Ccstn• (a) In Qetsism n ng said caste in ssaasr of direct land costa, the parties agras that such costs ats coats constitute ieurredtbY COUNTY equal to pro rate share of the a4ireq %sp in connection with the CITY -COUSV civic cents: as deter d in Exhibit •A•, incorporated herein by this refarener, after giving CITY1i%,0 onnection pro ith said acquisition Of Zxh4 it "As' by (d) The CM, follwir4 its "u'"tion of the SITE, shall assusa all tax and raei^Y.c Snterrstn�3arein o$r -uupon the levied upon the Property CITY•■ operation thereof or the CITY's obligation undrr applicable tax laws. SECTION 4. Title Insurance. (a) rraliminary Title Revert. Escrow holder is instructed tr Proem =e a (.LTA standard form Policy of ts.cls insurance as soon 25 Po�rible after escrow has been opened as a prnrtquirite to insuring title In CIT -2- 0 issued by title Insurance acceptable to both COUM'Y and CITY, in the full amount of the pvroha2a price and costs heze:n agreed to be reimbursed ,^.ro rata share by CITY for the BITE, and shove title sub - �uct to the following conditienss (1) Comical aad special tames not yet de1icqusnt1 (Z) Such recvrdod covenants, coudittona and sa- strictions which might exist tbcrecnl and, (I) Any liens, encumbraxcss, eassmants, rights of way, rights et record, items. exception or eonditien• which sight mtiet against title, unlasa disapproved by CITY or prc+idad below. (b) Review of preliminary Title Raper'.'. CITr Shall have the right to ceviaw the title sport and the items and exceptions shown tbcrein. dhltld CITY mat dle- approve said title report by serving written notion of its objection tj asy item thereon to COMM within :!l Lean (13) days after receipt Of said title report, it shall be presumed thtt CITY has accepted the same and escrow shall uo longer be subject to the romdremeat or CITY -o approval therecl. In the went that CITY shall df*spprove said preliminary title report or any itm ref•ir -d to ttarsia, COUNTY shall use its boat efforts to oorrwt those matters prior to the glose of escrow- SECTION � S Esrtnv_ L] within ten (10) auoinoss days foil wlmg acquisition by the COUM of the real property described in Exhibit W, but not later than December 13, 1901, an escrow covering the sale of the subjsat property nail be opened at an eocrw mutually acceptable to the COMM and CITY, and each shall execute eeerw instructions and such other documents as era reasonably aeceseuy and convenient to open the escrow and to satisfy the terra and a nditio" of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be referred to mad sad" a part of said escrow instruc- tions whore applicable and eppropriata, and to the extent this Agree- ment is incensistant with or conflicts with Be" aacraw instrue ens, ,.his Ajrsament shall control ix all respects. It is the intent of the parties iProto that, where applicable, the provisiom of this agreement shall survive thG close of escrow. It is specifically undossttiod and agreed tact time 'a of the essence of each and every provision harecndar. JECTI:M 6. 'term oL Escrow and -anditioL_for yxtansioas acme )r� Tali *serf" shall close -o later than Janzasy 1S, 106. providing the COC'arY hum acquired the real proper:} desarlb" In Exhibit "A ". if not, the escrow shall :lose sa soca as posiLt'_s alter tho COUNTY nas acquired the said -sal property. The coat -3- 0 of escrow shall be born* equsily by the patties hereto. Tends and insurance p- aatuu, if any, shall be a�all he heeid rtiss At the COUNTY close o. escrow. aasoam ants, if anyr Y and CITY. The oast of title insurance shall be shared by the C0UMY and CZ-y: Es=vw dull be olcso&, and title to the SITX, transferred to CITY aster paytseat of $919,323.35 and costs to COUNTY. SF.C'TZOM �. Wfanit by Pnrahasar - ('Z'l7. In the event CITY fails to sake any payasmt of the purchmse price prascptly whm the aria shall be cams due as therein spsaifiud, or COUNTYYm yyelectsto speo�iaaally aenforce�thhi Atrsmaa�_ to enucise the rights gig t itsn�er� etdm 3(r)i taredicmail at dwada, notices or other paper y by p. o. CITY Cjp Rancho Cueamong, ai G1 foornia291730,10 sat Unit addrase as CITY m/ indicate in writing to CAHTY. S=r(M B O"fault by Seller - COUNTY. IL COUNTY is uns CVO the accordance tarns of this coetrnct, CITY Eorvioe of such 4otsand may be made by reglstead sail at the Ca iforni 9 15, at .� Office, the San L teing to CITY. SECTION 9. assignment. This hgwvsmnt ahall not be assignable by either COUNTY or CITY without tho consent o_ the other party. Scwwsr, both parties request that a notice of Intention to assign be nailed to the address as listea in Section and t% .at onl after by the other party =y 12 the assignment in factrbetallowwed. 1e gloss SECMON 10 condition of Premises. CITY sad COUNTY atipulatse that a full inspection of the property has been made and that neither the COUNTY nor their asstgns shall be hold to any covenant respecting thO ccr4ition of my improve- ments x. the premises, or t any agreement for alterations, , or rfkpairs, unless the covenant or agreemenC relied on is in writing And atUched to and made a part of this contract. 9LCTION 11. purposes. The CITY shell use the land purchased for the aferadescrib- ad purposes &m4 for such purposes as may be incidental thereto dECfION 12. Cotinas. All noticem atmtawnts, denmads, ragtsstm, aonsentc, approvals, Authorisaticna, offers, agreeeents, apyointmnts, or designations hereunder by either party to the other stall be in vritin.7 and shall ba sufficiently given and served upon the other party, if sent by usited states ropletered mail, return roccSpl: roQuested, postage gre;sid and addressed as follovs, COUM OF Alas Sx7maDIL0 COW?2T AWDITATRaTiliz OTrIcs 157 Meet Fifth street S" Bernardino, CA 92415 CITY Or s&=o cucAKc4= City Hall, 9320 Baseline Toad, unit C Post Office sox 607 Sangho CRCaaa,ga, CA 91730 SECTION 13. Partial Invalidity . or eonditioaa� this r sore of terms, Provisions, proaiaas, covenants A,resment, or the apylieatlon thereof to any parson or orroumstancs, shall to any extant bs adjudged invalid, ur- enforc&able, void or voidabla for, any reason whatsoever by a Court or competent jurisdiction owh and all of the remainin3 texas, pro- visions, promisee, covenants and c3nditione of this Agreement, and the application thereof to other parsons or oircuastknees, shall not W affected thercb7. and shall be valid and enforceable to the full- est extant permitted by law. SECTION 14. Attorneys Fees. If suit is brought hereon, vhethar settled or purstad to final judgment, or if any attorroy it aaploysd and azpeasa• are incurred to eospel performance of this Agreesent, or any portion of this Agreement herein, the undersigned shall pay all attorney foes as r result of Wry action or procosding, Saclading appeals or further litigation thereon. As used in this contract, Attorneys Fats refers to full �zsts of any and all legal services performed and calculated on the basin of usual fees charged by attorneys defined Im any star services and ruling of limited to ressoAbls the court, includingfbut, not limiter: to Rule 402, Section 1 of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Chaptor Rr of the San Bernardino County Superior court Rule, to rornsel Fee&. Bole 1112.1. -5- TTM of 4�' 211 WMW r the paz<tisa Darsto hava "as" t" LSVA fats A9=alhf�at to be szacatad and attoatsd qt Wir PTO"r otticass thtre=to astof the dadai7�� y"r firatt*b"* v = "tt�� be hassta attizadr ATTYSTI of AMylpkcaaauocgaCity APYRU O as TO FMI $YI County county COaaAat County of am foraazdino Bra Mayor of fbs city oL fAaOW Caoiz>o mar 91 oo=ty�ydaiaSotrativa Office v co=ty of San fE1•L urdino -6- CITY OF RAN^•HO (;UCA310NGA ® MEMORANDUM November 13, 1981 TO: The City Manager and Members of the City Council FRQR: Assistant City Nanagerl- SUCJErT: Presentatio,r of Alternatives for Development of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Raster plan As you are already aware, the City staff has been working with he County and their architects to develop an alternative to the originally submitted =star plan scheme, Attached are both revision alternatives the Scheme I Ore Zito theherA ICasa earlier this year, Schnme It is a second alternative -Alch addresses most of staffs' concerns relating to submitted master plan ,Scheme I), iriginally 8ott. alternatives will be presented at the City Council's regularly scheduled m=eting of November 18, 1981 by N.O.K. and N, ",C, Architects. AS part of their presentation, the Architects will outline the evolution of :hose two alternatives and the merits of each scheme. The the of this presentation is to arrive at a consensus of the rasa ayprepriate scheme for the master plan and receive S authorization to continue development r Council's preferred alternative. u ✓vz Enclosures u N Alternatives -- Civic Ctr. Master Plan y Page Two November 13, 1981 CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES J SCHEME I I. Provides a central Courtyard surrounded by accessible Parking and loop road circulation. 2. Creates a 'singular" identity on site with City Hall and Cultural Center part of a large Courtyard complex. 3. Joint development of a Courtyard would provide the City with infrastructure we probably could not afford to develnp ourselves. SCHEME II 1. Creates separate Identity and 'City' Courtyard scheme. 2. Provides Haven Avenue exposure and reduces 'sea' of parking adjacent to Haven Avenue. 3. Provides City Hall and Cultural Center with more accessible and "City oriented parking. Under Scheme I, City Hall users would be competing for 'close in' parking. 4. Provides Improved traffic circulation and with longer access road off of Civic Center Drive, there is better stacking (more time for drivers to orient themselves to the site, the appropriate building and accessible parking). ` S. Separation from County Court and development of two °satellites" ,J City Courtyard!County Courtyard improves transition of the scale of the buildings. City build!ngs are proposed two stories and 6. Provides more flexibility buildings to therCity for long-range stories. long -ra gepianning '.n development of its portion of the site. Being part of a large Courtyard scheme could limit tha City's future alter- natives. 7. Scheme II allows the City to move in development of its portion Of the Civic Center at its own pace. 8. Provides improved pedestrian circulation for City Hall :lients from accessible 9. Scheme IIrepresentsia9 more 4suburban theme iand. less of a highly urbanized theme with the ,Joint Courtyard In Scheme 1. a Bath Schemes would provide 300 parking spaces allocated for City Hall and Cultural Center uses and developement of a separate City Police Facility. s � x x `a t2 N -~ I E. 0 j ir�� � � TIV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO \'GA STAFF REPORT February 2, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager RE: Proposed Hest Valley Law And Justice Center /Haven Avenue/ Civic Center Drive BACKGROUND. The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino have entered into an agreement to Jointl, purchase a 25.5 acre site located near the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue for the purpose of deva loping a Civic Center/ Law & Justice Center. The City's share of the site is 8.5 acres mw and could accoodate a 60,000 square foot City Nall, a 30,000 square foot Cultural Center, a 30,000 square foot police facility and appropriate parking, courtyard and landscaping The County will initially construct a Court facility of some 220,000 square feet and eventually.!, ore -triai detention center on their portion of the site. The attached am of November 13, 1981 outlines the two pre- liminary site plans submitted to the City Council. The City Council ultimately selected the second alte' native for reasons stated in that report. OBJECTIVE: The County's architects responsible for the design and development Of the Yest Valley Law and Justice Center will be making a pre - sentstion to the Planning Commission outlining their p:-ogress to date and in essence presenting the project for your •aview and cowmen; In reality, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has no legal authority in terms of design review or development criteria. how- ever this presentation will provide an opportunity for the Planning ' ITEM J Continued.. .. i Nest Valley law and Justice Center February 2, 1982 Page Two Covmissfon to StsteIts 'crltlque• evaluate j4M �romhjo�Ounty, dg aISOPOsed Court facfl al b esemPt fro talsdth:t Thee efew Pro eIssfo Ula dcas,sluchvuePt Under Comalssfon fa Is for fmpprovegent that should be eutei �+Pefvll are so$ seryaus deflcfeneSho? Planning thatrviso�s or a t tArou coo fdered, the City or at 9h a Jofnt . y CouncO areas wi 1 coeplement nth tAe eL/ Y to endure Ccu ga"0aus project rd of Should you have y' speclf, Nest Vnytea Lew and Justice Center fans regarding the of aDrvar to the P rase on t hesitate to givepaesa ealjanent2r JNk /vz Fnclosure J bi �7 4-� did,,; fro M UP N ZT .2 101 Q) 4M A4110 � O $ .1 Vu ill 6 al , Y qF 1 11.21 V M. x� i. x.�Y 7 � V �i • pmw-� 4-� did,,; fro M UP N ZT .2 101 Q) 4M A4110 � O $ .1 Vu ill 6 al , Y qF 1 11.21 V M. x� i. x.�Y 7 m4 r` i i c d !I Z4ii' 81�'�' Jr.) III gill W fill s o Jill fill y fill Il jk l �A ihm-W'1.9'I Yr r ! �W •1_ -- Yti�-J if I N C .a o gMY a1 I, CQ AJ C c c U g $ JI •a�e:��s�Ra�fivn�_ 3�j� y i� Notes to SB 2543, Sectlen S After meeting with CSAC's committee and Board of Corrections, the following Is notedt The additional $13 million allocated to San Bernardirw County (along with the rest of the allocated funds) �1fs_„32KSjLJ,_projeets that wero unfunded wider SubdlVbl.n (c) of Sect o peer 444 of the Statute of 1989. The project for San Bernardino County :s the Rancho Cucamonga facility and if the project changes, the law Indicates that the funds revert !=R to the "pot" for redilocatlon of which Orange County is first in Wte, if the project Is moved, other counties are waiting to try and reallocate the funds. *'' t� r ) t t t• soma _t_ by this act "not be ,sad bo bey and tk the camtial cannot afford• to oprrata SEC• d. (at For tha ptsrpaaa of" act (1) "Beare "rwtitbs board of Corraetlona• r`ir`l (3) r w nears t to Sat.•l4on c y (3 Znw- weem the 190 County cosift4iona F .. ..j r rA ..*10M shall not ibalf be i a�a�`y, ai �aab %aK'QIA YM,� (.z- OC OfneCwlae be fUb]aet W of the publi�e the G1lfornis Enviroe"W" l Qlwhty Act for any activities under this act, the Co:mty Tail Capital Expenditure Bond Act of 1961, or the County Jail Capital Expenditure Bond•Act of 964.,, 1d vidcn don not exempt any oyl,MIh ments of the Callforsda Environmantal Quality Act SEC. S. Money appropr(atad to the Boerd of Corrections by this act s be allocated as follows: (a) Fundlnt shall be' provided for those protects entitled to be 6asded undet subdivision (c) of Section 3 of extentthat� a of the protects statutes ave nott6received 'fun funding. (b) The folloHint additional amounts shall be allocated to the counties for the construction. reconstruction, replacement, or renovation of county tail facilities or medical facllltln for mentally W prisoners - These funds shall not be used to supplant loco, funds directed to previously approved state fundeu protects. These funds may be used for aliecatior.s specified in subdivisions (c) and (d) of Chapter N:, Statutes of 1960, ! as wh6nded, nr for Lew protectsr \ •• •• > .T• .. } Alpine 9 BAuteor 5,911,957 i Calaveras 0 Colusa o Contra Costs 134,72D 336,176 Del Norte 150,720 s uss ■ ', 3 I SB subs OAWW II I I,M704 a,e�ot�s 0 San Francisco San Joaquin s ..:San•Lu ..Obispo. . San Mateo Santa Cru.. Shasta u .,:r.,....r ...:,.• .:', is r. ,..r. ...,., , Sierra 718,842 Slskiyou 1,391,1107 • Solana 1,633,689 Sonoma M Dorado F1emo Clew Humboldt ia• � ;�;• Yern Lake La Angeles ' Mbdem Mein a4 Marippcceett Mendxlno Merced { Modoc Mono Monterey v r, Napa Nevada Orange Placer Plunv s Rive, side Sacramento San Benito I SB subs OAWW II I I,M704 a,e�ot�s 0 San Francisco San Joaquin s ..:San•Lu ..Obispo. . San Mateo Santa Cru.. Shasta u .,:r.,....r ...:,.• .:', is r. ,..r. ...,., , Sierra 718,842 Slskiyou 1,391,1107 • Solana 1,633,689 Sonoma 14,150,000 IN too F � r Q � I •P SH 2w S,9g� Sicntdau¢ map" o Sutter Twt OPM Tub" 1001,1 TuOlunme i1 Ventura 4AWA% Yo10 Yuba) that it is unable to use the (c) lE any county declares testy is unable to satisfy ds d{ocated to It, of if an)'��tion the r the prerKuWtes for fundsrK amount allocated to the coun:'by the board as follows: �i° be reallocat be given to Monti" %first ppriority for reallocation shall 8i limits! on the followlnB llat subject to e fo thllow•in6 , $ 7,000,000 orange County ......: 3000,000 Sacramento count) ......... ................ 2,000, San nano CO City and county .... l I ggw'000 San Francisco ty Santa Clara County ._.... .. . "•.... ....................... 4,000. ° Ventura County.-*,*,,* .... **** . hail be L Among these counties, reallocated on the amount 4 , vtf1ea gyu�ds shallbe distributed twice• " .. • . Y ¢warded to each on a pro raG basis �syy L. IM. the 1rhedir disstriibbution shit( riccui'on'1 ter 31, IM If fhe first tribj,tlon;hall occur on D"com architectural scc* dot . t.. Lit bas*nOt cgmyJet! any count' On oration funds become avallable deawin&s at the time read �Jnoved fro. for it, the county hall a arcb{tectsual drawings- has ,+s list until it has beyond those needed for the�eerO d amd�u fu in available for reallocation, dare for ammo prapose a reallocation formula or proce ` Shall q legbi 1v fie del •��aturi s inteudon that 1n any I: 94 sa I 1. Letter dated 1/29181 from the city to county rat lnvltatiuA to locate In the city 2. Minutes of meeting dated 6119181 ret EIR meeting 3. Letter dated 9/18/81 from city to consultant ret moving detention tc NE corner 4. Minutes dated 10/12/81 tram M&ECM ret EIR meeting 3. Inter - office memo dated 1/12/82 ret copy an roaster plan schedule to city 6. Letter dated 2113/82 from Yjhn Mid:.olson to Jeffrey Kings Chairman of the Rancho Cucmcnnga Pbnntng Commission ret after presentation of project 7. Inter - office memo dated 3/17/82 res presentations to the city 8. Inter - office memo dated 3/19/82 ret Board workshop 9. Letter dated 3/19/82 to city rat Board workshop Invitation 10. Letter dated 3/19/87 ret invitation to city to attend workshop 16 Minutes of Baud of Supervisors dated 3/23/82 ret site master plan and detention facility 12. EIR dated 9/17/82, page 4 - project description t' ti t l r -.City of ANCHO (]UCANIONGA January 29, 1981 Honorable David Merriam f ;1 Presiding Judge I V West Valley Municipal Court 1050 West 6th Street Ontario, California 91762 Dear Judge Merriam: The purpose of this letter is to clear up some possible confusion re- garding the City's position with respect to the location of the County's Law and Justice Center. As you are probably aware, the City of Rancho Cucamonga opposed the proposed location of the Law and Justice Center adjacent to Guasti Regional Park. It is important to note, howeser, that the City's opposition was based solely on that specific loca:icn, adjacent to the Guasti Regional Park. The purpose to you lave a that Cucamonga Center somewhere within our Community. We feel that the addition of this County facility would greatly enhance tt,e wuld services to the opportunity future citizens of our Community. o discuss the location of a Law and Justice Center in Rancho Cucamonga, if you so desire. Please feel free oreg an, detail. Wasserm Sincerely, Phi10. Schlosser Mayor POS /vz CC/ city Council , � rr i i• ., ;t.,'• POST, OFFICF. 00:i 79.1. HANCIIO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91710 (7I4) 989.1851 'L!4.4 Et,�.:'e- .1Y :� ✓t `.:F•t .. .,. .P�. 'A � 1^ o-f t ^f .`y'�_[iL ', I J i. Y tt INTER- OFFICE MEMO DATE January 12, 1982 FROM JOHN F. MICHAELSON C� 1' PHONE 1535 Adminietrative Anal t, CAD To ALL WEST VALLEY LAW AND JUSTICE CENTER- DEPA:.rPMaS SUDJLCT WEST VALLEY LAW AND JUSTICE CENTER UPDATE a 3 On Decemoer 16, 1981, Bob Rigney met with the architects and reviewed the rroposed Master Plan as presented to user departments on December 11. Mr. Rigney expressed some of the same concerna aw users did about the exterior of the courthouse building. The architects have responded to these concerns with a slightly revised building shape, which was presented to Mr. Rigney on January 11, 1982o With a law minor =djustments, Mr. Rigney approved the exterior plan. The architects were asked to return on January 25 with revised drawings to reflect those final changes and meet with Mr. Rignay and all user departments. The revised plan, which I expect to receive early next week -...a for distribution, includes the relocation of the Sheriff's substation to the southern tip of the project site. This change was agreed to by both the City and the Sheriff's Office. Since our last meeting, the energy consultant has completed his initial review, including the moat recent changes, and feels that the present: design will he a most efficient energy -u3e building. The EIR is progressing on schedu]a, and we expect a draft EIR within the next several weeks. Further, this office is working with the Sheriff's Department, analyzing the needs and benefits associated with the jail for the project site. It is hoped that this report can be included in the workshop session with the Board when final schematic designb are presented towards the first of March. The Board workshop mentioned at the end of the following calendar is to include the architect and construction mana- ger amended contract for approval, any EIR approvals that must be given, and discussion of the first phase of the jail. This represents the and of the schematic phase, which will identify specific department areas but not include specific design of such things as interior layout of the model court- room, individual offices, counter areas, conference rooms, and kitchenettes. These further refinements of the plan will happen in design development, which will occur betwean March and July of the current year. i aw, wt, .n 'r WEST VALLEY LAW AND Janup 12 JUSTICE CENTER UPDATE rY ' 2 Page 2 The following is an anticipated timetable for the next sixty days of the West Valley Law and Justice Center. Janaary 13 CAD ant! John Michaelson meet with City rogresentatives to review the court facility plan to this point and obtain their concurrence. JanuarrL Re%ised Master Plan floor plane to be received from architect and distributed to user departments. January 25 Architects meet first with CAD and then users tLrough valance of the day. r alll be contacting you to setablish times for these meetings. Janeary 26 Architect's forms for project estimates completed and reviewed with construction manager. February 8 Architect meats with user departments to make final refinamonts to floor plans and facility. February 8 -12 Architect and project representative meet with the City staff for final review of project. February 26 Architect submits final schematic package and reviews final plans with CAO staff in preparation for Hoard workshop, Mach 2 or 3 drawings,8acc pteextendedacontractapprove ith architect and construction manager, review jail needs, and approve any EIR requirements to that point. If you have any questions or comments on any of the above material, please call me at 383 -1535. JPMsfrh FA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r.. PYUIq D.6eflwu Arliv D. Brfdla Jw D. MUuL j QQQ S .,r,G P,wt Mk\uIA. P&U.b 197% September 18, 1981 J Hr. Gilbert A,ta s Gilbert Aja &Associates 23117 Plaza Pointe Orive Suite 100 Laguna Hills, California 92643 Dear Gilbert: At its regular meeting of September 16!! 1981, staff presented to the City Council the conceptual site plan `Concept C) for the proposed Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center. After a review by the City Council 1} and staff, the following represents n consensus of-th review: E 1. That the City should insure that adeyvote sp }c(:b S�ISated " for the future construction of a Police Facility, hip close proximity to the City Hall and Cultural Cenek sit . ,'- l'Adequetc" space would include area set aside for se:u1'e parkiwand full pumps. „ • £. That the City Police facility should have a separate identity and not be a part of the proposed jail / dettntion center. in addition, the City police facility may or twy not be . part Of the first phase of this project which would include a City Hall and Court facility. 3. The City is in agreement with the County that the fail /detention center should be moved to the northeastern edge of the site as a depicted in the revis -4 concept "C" dated 0- 15 -81. 4. Concerns were expressed As to the necessity of the "Ceremonial t Entrance" on Haven Avenue. It was recomnended that some thoi :ght r; be given to relegating the vehicular entrance to a 'visual" and L pedestrian entrance. A median will he required along Haven which may impact the concept of a Haven Avenue entrance. Continued.... POSTOF7 L90XW7 RANCHO CUC.OIONOA. CALIFORNIA 11770 • (7111ft1.l131 <.N �.i -6r2S i!4�'.i.�•: r.. ,�tl.lii:. ,_.. a �,- ..::e` �y��s�,�' a >4 v ;t if 1 ,l� jJ 4� V V. a- 4 � 4 I ILIr }, 0 n � O +' J N 0 cl i Ct /\ - .in { ! f, � � \ � • ,. / �7 -- 7- {_3 't I � - {f � � • i • '� .. - ���_ � a � 1q a Ia r ,20 � S Y NEST VALLEY COURT AND CIVIC CENTER RE41SED PROGRAM 11 -18 -81 ` GROSS S9, FT. Bm OtNG F� COURTHOUSE 210,000 S0. FT. 56,000 So, FT, FARKING 840 CARS Yew PRE-TRIAL DETENTION 245,000 SQ. FT, 45,090 SQ. FT. PARKING 15 CARS r fOUVTM TOTAL 455,000 SO. FT. 101,00D SO. FT, 915 CARS i' e � CITY HALL PARKING CULTURAL CENTER PARKING i 5r POLICE FACILITY PARKING �I RAII TOTAL 60,000 'SO. FT. 240 CARS 15,000 So. FT. 60 CARS 15,000 SQ. FT. 300 CARS 30,000 So. FT. 120 CARS 560,000 sn. FT. 1,335 CARS 30,000 So. FT. 15,000 SQ. FT. 45,000 so. F -. 15,000 so, FT. 161,000 so, FT. , • u� �e h���p� L y..r. ?Y MINUTES West Valley Law and Justice Center San Bernardino County, California 19 October 1981 Place: Office of County of San Bernardino, 1111 East Mill St , San Bernardino, CA Date: 13 October 1981 Time: 2:30 PM Attended: Chuck Bell, County of San Bernardino Kitty Hitchcock, County of San Bernardino John Michaelson, County of San Bernardino Jim Robinson, City of Rancho Cucamonga Jack Lam, City of Rancho Cucamonga Dick Corneille, MLE /CM Jack A. Hall, MiE /CM The meeting was called by the County of San Bernardino to discuss the requirements and procedure for the '24av ^g g^ R ron- mental Impact Resort for the building site for this projFg�. KEY POINTS: 1. It was mutually agreed that a focused EIR is required which will stand by itself and that the previous EIR for this property could be iuted as a reference docuvant. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has available as a reference a more recent general EIR. 3. The City is concerned with the effects of traffic and drainage which the completion of the civic center complex will have on s. the area. 'k 4. The County will take the lead in the consultant selection process for the preparation of the EIR. c S. Request for proposals will be sent to a total of six econsultants. 6. The selection of the consultant will be by both the City Of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino. a ai 7. In a discussion Of time, it was stated that the approvals required to start construction could be achieved by early March, SC. 1981. } -• Min•ites - 13 Octo'e-, 1981 Page 2 These are my impres8ion8 of the diacusaiona which • the meeting held on 13 October di un the the meeting An occurred at should ed. Any attendees Who disagree trine and location the undersigned. With any of the above Respectfully submitted, /Jack Hall Project Manager I cc: aohn Michaelson. Dick Corneille P ' � P Jeffrey Ring, Chairman Rancho Cucamonga PlannIag commission P. O. Box 807 gaT.cho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Ring: I would like to express my sincere approciation for the opportunity to appear before you and the balance of the Planning Commission to present our plans for the Court facility to be located with your City facilities near Foothill and Haven. As I mentioned during the meeting, you raised a valid concern over the visual impact of the north and west exterior walla of the courthouse. I have asked the architects to concentrate their efforts over the next several weeks on this particular concern. Within three weeks I expect to be able to send drawings to your staff reflecting appropriate changes. Again, I thank you and the Commission for the opportunity to present our project. Your thoughtful comments will help to make our facility a better facility which we can all point to in future years as a landmark of joint City and County cooperative efforts. sincerely, JOHN F. MIAtf"LSON County Project Representative JFM:frh cog Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission City Council, City of Rancho Cucamonga Robert B. Rigney, County Administrative Officer Robert 0. Townsend, Supervisor, Fourth District Cal McElwain, Supervisor, Second District Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, City of Rancho Cucamonga Jim Robinson, Asst. City Manager, City Of Rancho Cucamonga Don Gillis, Harnish, Morcan a Causey Bill Valentine, Hellmuth, Obata i Rassabsum �-31 -- it COQ "bF SAN BE 1DINO wuo B.nnawB� ROBERT B. RIGNEY MWjfJ'U.TM ONJC., D, a 0T..+.V Y4WwtiU. G..v. /T LW [t COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVC OFFICE Cw.WCNk B.WinB EM f 87 Wnt Fifth SUM San annudl.. CA 02415 17141312018 Pebruary 15, 1982 Jeffrey Ring, Chairman Rancho Cucamonga PlannIag commission P. O. Box 807 gaT.cho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Ring: I would like to express my sincere approciation for the opportunity to appear before you and the balance of the Planning Commission to present our plans for the Court facility to be located with your City facilities near Foothill and Haven. As I mentioned during the meeting, you raised a valid concern over the visual impact of the north and west exterior walla of the courthouse. I have asked the architects to concentrate their efforts over the next several weeks on this particular concern. Within three weeks I expect to be able to send drawings to your staff reflecting appropriate changes. Again, I thank you and the Commission for the opportunity to present our project. Your thoughtful comments will help to make our facility a better facility which we can all point to in future years as a landmark of joint City and County cooperative efforts. sincerely, JOHN F. MIAtf"LSON County Project Representative JFM:frh cog Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission City Council, City of Rancho Cucamonga Robert B. Rigney, County Administrative Officer Robert 0. Townsend, Supervisor, Fourth District Cal McElwain, Supervisor, Second District Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, City of Rancho Cucamonga Jim Robinson, Asst. City Manager, City Of Rancho Cucamonga Don Gillis, Harnish, Morcan a Causey Bill Valentine, Hellmuth, Obata i Rassabsum INTER - OFFICE MEMO o DATE March 17, 1982 FROM JOHN F. MICHAELSON W( PHONE 1535 Administrative Analys TO ROBERT B. RIGNEY cc: Lynn %irkhofer County Administrative Officer `..SUBJECT WEST VALLEY LAW a JUSTICE CENTER on your agenda today, at 3:30 P.m., is a meeting to discuss the West Valley Law and Justice Canter. At this meeting, I would like to discuss with you not only the final design but also the items listed below. Project Design The project design is primarily the same as you last saw it. The design was r,aviewed with the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission last month. The Commission and the Daon Corporation representatives each expressed concern over the sterile, abrupt image of the north and west walls. The design you will see today responds to that concern by breaking the plan with verti- cal lines on bo +:h walls. The City Planning Commission chairman has sent me a letter thanking the County for its presentation and the opportunity to comment on the prnjoct and seemed to feel assured that they have been heard. 4ddition»lly, the land dale agreement between the City and the County is to be approved in final form by the City on March 17. The division of property is shown in Attachment A, which is also the parcel map attached to the land sale agreement. The project designer, William Valentine, and his assistants will be present to brief you on the building. '.n addition, I'm sure that H16C will have representatives present, as will Jack Hall, the construction manager from Metcalf a Eddy /CM. The EIR screen draft summary is attached as Exhibit B, and the full screen draft is expoeted to be received this week. As you can sea by the attachment, there do not appear to be any significant environmental -tncerns that must be mitigated beyond a reasonable level. Project Budget Attachment C is a summary of the current project budget. It lists only expenditures to be made from this point forward, but includes reimbursement from the City for `he land sale and is approximately $4.5 million above the estimate given to the t w'r` WEST VALLEY LAW S JUSTICE CENTER Page 2 financial consultants several weeks ago but made last August. The far right column delineates the areas containing these overruns. Attachment D is a list submitted by the construction manager and architect on proposed cuts to bring the project back into alignment with the previously submitted budget. I would like to discuss this in much greater detail with both you and Lynn Kirkhofer prior to a setting of a final project budget. Contract Amendment Both the construction manager and architect contracts must be amended at the conclusion of the schematic design., which is the point we are now at. I have met and discussed both contracts with the respective firms, and I am in agreement with the final amendment fes construction management services. The architect's contract, however, will require further negotiations, as we presently appear to be about $100,000 to $200,000 apart. I haves told the architects that I would hope that this amendment could be included in the workshop presentation to the Board. However, if it is not resolved prior to that time, it will have to be taken as a separate, stand -alone item to the Board of Supervisors and may therefore receive much closer scrutiny Projected Courtroom Needs As you are aware, one of the major concerns of the judges has been, and remains, adequate number of courtrooms. Attachment E shows this office's analysis of the number of courtrooms and how they will be accommodated. We feel that this appropriately addresses the needs through the year 2000. I feel confident that the judges will respond by saying that the total number of courtrooms may be accurate, however, the proliferation of court- rooms to this many sites is very inefficient and not in the County's best interests. In addition, I have asked the con- struction manager to &apply various cost estimates of alternatives to (1) make the building strong enough to support an additional floor, or (2) shall in an additional floor. This may or may not be appropriate to include in the report that goes to the Board. Jail Study —� Attachment F is the Sheriff's study of jail needs throughout the County. The sheriff has stated that he will make a strong plea to the Board of Supervisors to include at least a first- phase jail at the Rancho Cucamonga site. For your information, ." an analysis of the Sheriff's proposal by Kent Lihme is included as Attachment G. ¢ I .t WEST VALLEY LAM S JUSTICE CENTER Page 3 , site sign There have been requests from Supervisor McElwain to hold an opening or groundb= eaking ceremony prior to elections in June. This can be easily schec:uled working with the PIO and construction a theaprojectdsiteoindicating theofuture County facilitiesat dbe included. attachment H is a possible ai.gn design for your review. .M4: frh Attachments 1 ' rt Il u er s•�3+1`rV'�;S °l:�x "w �l .�� :'a.,ia: : {:. � t.. .E :';i�:2 W •' M `y. 1 C i I TIT IL I �f ATTF.CHMEh'T X } ATTACilMHMT 3- t• r -1.0 SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction The County of Son Bernardino, the lead . agency with respect to the environmental review of the Law and Justice Cents, prepared an Initial Study on the project, as defined In Section of the "State EIR Cuidellnesp in October, 1981. The conclusions of this analysis indicated that the Proposed project may have significant adverse environmental ef'eets and that a focused EI,4 would be required. A Wticb of Preparation was prepared on November 3, 1981 and sent to responslble'locai agencies nrx! the Slate Clearinghouse 1t (SCH 81111315). ! Thts Draft EIR was subsequently prepared and "focused" on those issues identified in the Initial Study. The issues were socloeconorntcs, Traffic and circulation, oesllxtics, fiscal impacts, growth Inducement, and drainage. This report was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Implementing guidelines (as amended). 1.2 Description of the Pfo ect The proposed Law and Justice Center will be loroted on a 25.5 -acre site In the central :. portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The site b barb_red by Haven Avenue an the west, Aspen Street on the cast, and Civic Center Drive on the south. The Center which will serve as a joint Cit-/County complex, includes a City Hall (85,000 square ♦leet), a Court Bulld!ng (225,000 square feet), a Pre -trial Detention Facility (275,000) square feet), Police /Sheriff st'stotion (30,000 square feet), and a Cultural Center (101000 and —� square Yr tially wCh the Detention City Facility Flail, Cultural Center to be constructed In55-- rp 10 years. The site is within the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. The Law and Justice Center re- places cpproximntely 373,000 square feet of professional office and light Indum lal uses as defined in the approved Rancho Cucamonga Business Pak Specific Plan. 13 Summery of Adverse Impacts and Mitloation Measures Socioeconomics Ian is The Law ad Justice Center itself poses no conflicts with the proposed bu.tiness such munlcipal institutional facilities are routinely located in commrcial and 1191st industrial areas. The primary concern was the potential affect of the pre -triel do- tenticn In other future ounties and an disscussilons with planners n upon ose jurisdlctiontisro evidence could be found to Indicate the proposed facility would significantly imgan' fu- ture useq of surrounding lands. Mitt floor There are several factors within the design of the project (e.g., the location 0 1 etentlon Facility within the complex, provision of adequate Parking end the pro- any p to landscaped for impacting open space seas that can be used by visitors that serve to reduce enY Potential far impacting adjacent land wes. Further, the sea to the west of the Low and Justice Center (the direction in which the closest residential uses could be comtr=ied) Is designated for ".nixed uses° hereby arxn t Possesses the flexibility within itself to buffer future residential uses from the cam. merclal and institutional activity along Haven Avenue where Ilw center is located. Trafficulation IMPOCtl The Law and Justice Center will ult!mately generate 8,9J0 ADT, which repro. senls a 3,200 ADT Increase ova the irvffic generated by tics Business Park uses, The pro ect wltl increase tr%fic from the F,ustness Park U. ,� less than five percent an a dal y bats. Our to the small krream, the prefect will not affect the volume to capacity Park Traffic t roadway level of sernlce as described In the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Traffic Study, Miti tfom Due to the high volumes'of traffic on Haven access lverwe, It is recommended that from Haven Avenue be restricted io prohibit left turn egress from the site. Pedestrian paths and crossing locations In the vicinity of the Center should be dell with signing and landscaping to minfmlZi conflicts with the tnt,r , ......n..._. ___.._ ;� Center. Aesthetics �'mm�'ac � The Detention Facility, Protected to bo five storin, will be the most visually PromTnt structur in the Law and ustice Center, it will not will out of scale, however, wally with stories. adjacent Business Pak, which will have stnatures ranging from one to four with t M1ti lion: Although a facade treatment has not been determined for the Detention ac tY, Is reconunended that the treatment reflect the treatm_n} of the other structures In the Center, thereby, minimizing the visual Identity a separateness her building. the The propooed open space and landscaping will also serve complex rather than separate, unrelated structures. to identify the Center as a whole Dra" [nave Deer Creek is the major flood hazard sm*ce in the project area. Thu U.S. Army. Corps of flood control control constructing roments onCDeert Crreeek.racThumprovement project which includes completed in Fall, 1983. Deer Creek improvements will be t� 1 x+ t t The Low and Justly Canter sits will F.Ve subject to potential tnundotion of the moJcr drainr x facility for the Rancho Cucamongo Business Pork (the Pnow Route Drain) is completed prix to Ow improvement of Deer Creak up to Highlrnd Avenue. However, as the improvements an Deer Creek to Highiond Avenue will be completed fn Fall, 1982, which Is for ahead of any active use of the Law and Justice Center, flooding will not pose a constraint to use of site, i a t R ATTAcfLkuWJ• c NEST VALLEY LAw 6 JUSTICE CENTER• Cott � Estimate r� ,I Marsh 15, 1982 Increase fr. Prole —pct ¢ate August 1981 Fl-xed qu.p. Fixed ¢qu.pment 24,833,489 - satiate Site Development Moveable 1,399,264 1,067,480 Equip ... t Contingencies 8 7x 2_85 �I,(�_. ,000 tvo Y, ago 54,000 843,146 Cogsctuccio➢ - 12036.293 -0- Total 2,036.292 4.000.912 Constructive 7ian,.ger Fixed Fee Reimbursable 1,128,475 Inapeceore 706,0!5 272 504 2-3 Ari_ntect Fee. Interior. 1,798,000 I. - 011250 1,899, 250 Fee Total L 4,006,284 , 500,000 TOTAL PROJECT 36,558,466 4,500,000 C11Y Land Relmbu- semu,r CttY Site work Ralmburriment ✓/ 1,06_1,178`2 To cal kelmburs zmente ` \ 22— gL� // 11189,256 COUNTY NET COST 35 .269 210 r� ,I ' 4 f. METCALF & EDDY ATTACHMENT D CAI, CONSTRUCTORS /MANAGERS 790 NOM a Sbn( $2„0 00! an association San Onn.rmno. Ca 97491 T4'4PN9n•, (714) U' s 6.0 15 March 1982 Mr. John F. Michaelson, Administrative Analyst, County of San Bernardino, County Administrative Office, County Civic Building - East, 157 West Fifth Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415 Re: West Valley Law and Justice Center JOHN, in response to your request for possible changes to the above referenced project which would result in cost savings, I have compiled the following list and their eted value. Q, .1` S, VV= -7 11C t 1 Use stucco on natal studs in lieu of precast concrete panels - Deduct $1,200,000.00 +71 v $I 8,0 -0T.W ') 2 Delete exterior fountain Deduct $ 69 710.00 +7! ° 7 , 09.0 3 Delete pneumatic tube system Deduct $ 180 000.00 +71 m 1 2, 00.0 4 Delete holding cells >.n basement Deduct $ 790,551.00 +7e ° 045,809.00 5 Delete ramp to basement Deduct $ 251,223.00 +7R 2 ,86 09;00 6 Use standard grey precast concrete* Deduct $ 143,216.00 +79 — 153,241.00 I!U 2 y� *Note: !6 carnot be used in conju)lction with fl. t6 coLld easily be a bidding option. 37, cZ-p .TTCAV a (OOT. INC. 2)LI•nM OSI 9uu so CK INC. CONITROCTOA"ANA6(R! t� N. Mrm sap C4 92401 1(11 C•nary P,n (111 !a• 1e0) i ., ;N assess lot An.N. CA %X61 , 4 (2U)ev.n.2 y John P. Michaelson, 15 March 1982, Page Two e 7. Use a standard aluminum glazing system ' Deduct $ 170 786.00 +76 S e al.00 /5'2,7Y/ 8. Delete kitchen equipment Deduct $ 301 250.00 2z 33• +7► a ,337.0 F 3 9. Use standard concrete in lieu of brick pavers in court yard r Deduct $ 1a�5 369.00 +l► $ 155.540 4 10. Use painted drywall in lieu of wood paneling Deduct $ 530 859.00 +71 a 8,019. 0 11. Use mineral fiber tile with concealed suspension system in lieu of plaster coilings Deduct $ 592 940.00 +7► S 4! ,ddb -6S 12. Miscr neous cite deletions A. Use all 20" box trees in liou of 30" & 36" Deduct $ 207 578.00 +7► B. Delete seat walls Deduct $ 19 845.00 +71 C. Delete curb walls +71uc -t $ 11 340•u0 D. Delete truck dock wall Deduct $ 17— ,l�.if,_tj` .27; /yo The above are a few of the major items of potential cost savings. I'm sure we will discover several more in our meeting cn 16 March 1982, at which time we can also discuss the implications of each of the above proposed changes. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. ' o F :Best � s, f., g t Jack R. Hall, Project Manager c • JAH:Cb 10011 g' !'! ATTACHMENT E e P: WEST VALLEY PROJECTED COURTROOMS Projected Year 2000 Facilities Current @ 564,000 Pop. Chino 2 17 12 2 Ontario Rancho Cucamonga . 19 11 Workload • Municipal Court 5.8 Ontario 2 Chino Superior Court 7.2 ITZ Actual Judicial Positions 3' Municipal Court 6.4 6.0 Superior Court 177T 4 t *Plus 1 Municipal Court Judge to be assigned sometime within the .; next 12 months � Now that the County has indicated its intent to provide 35 court- rIJ ooms for the West Valley, it would be helpful if the Bench would indicate where the various court functions will be performed. a. Ai DATE March 3, 1982 FROM FRANK BLAND , SHERIFF PHONE TO ROBERT L. HAMMOCK, Chairman Board of Supervisors SUBJECT WEST VALLEY JAIL FACILITY ~ For the past year we have conducted an ongoing study of our West Valley jail needs. Our study completed in conjunction with the County Administrative Office demonstrates a need for a 579 bed facility by 2987. However, we are seriously concerned that plans are proceeding with a holding facility without fully understanding the consequences of failing to immediately move ahead .,ith the permanent jail facility. If the West Valley jail is not built, we will have chronic overcrowding of the ma'n jail which currently is running at capacity. In addition, we will be faced with: Court orders to reduce the jail population to legal limits in order to prevent cruel and inhumane ' housing of prisoners. Release of all prisoners possiblo on their own recognizance with its adverse affect t r the community and the Inherent risk the County assumes under such circumstances. Contracting the housing of felons to other oounties, the cost of which is currently $30 -S50 per day, with this county providing the transportation. Additional costs are incurred when these prisoners must appear in court. West Valley agencies - Police and Sher'ff - with the closing of the Ontario Substation, will not have a 24 hour booking station and will incur enormous ?, transportation costs in booking at the main jail. The West Valley Law and Justice Center is presently planned for a sparsely developed area in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To delay construction of the P17, facility antll the area is developed will force the b, /✓✓ e. Fate two county into a confrontation with the public In locating a jail in an established commugity. In all probability, what will heppon is that the county will be forced to locate the jail some distance from the court complex, being forced then to purcha3e additional property and having to fund eve increasing and continuing transportation costs. Failure to build now will result in higher construction costs as a result of inflation. cost of the proposed holding facility has been projected to be 2 -1/2 to 3 million dollars, monies which should be diverted to the construction of the jail. Grant funding requires a definite commitment from the Board of Supervisors on ftture jail construction plans. In conjunction with the County Administrative office, we have developed a mttually agreed upon method of assessing thq future jail needs. eased on population projections, population to booking ratios, a housing factor, and the rate at which the County's projected population growth will be achieved, we feel the following jail capacity needs are ., the minimum that will be required in the West Valleys West Valley(Includes the Fontana Area) 1985 472 1987 579 1990 692 20Cn 834 Present capa -ity in the jest Valley provides for the housing of 32 prisoners for a maximum of 48 hours. The addition of 40:' cells to the Central Jail is not an answer to solving the housing needs that will be generated by the West Talley. The Central Jail is presently running at 104 percent capacity. Population projections indicate the East Valley is only three to five years behind the West Valley in its population explosion. AlsN, to be = onsidered are the proposals for locating a maxinun security prison wit', a 1,000 bed capacity in Adelr ^to, a 2-CO indNeedlesu.a Alluofethesesfacilitiesswil� prison !:rPac the housing capabilities of the Central Jail. .e pas% three The need for the permanent jail in the West V 11ey Is evident. It must also be stressed that the facility to ready for occupancy at the same time as the West;Valley Law and Justice Center. It is also• very important for the Board to make a timely. commitment to the construction of the facility. Recent legislation will place SB 910 on the November ballot. This Initiative provides for the issue of bonds to raise $285 million for jail construction. If passad by the voters (31MP10 majority required), we ara probably looking at an early Spring 1983 funding round. To be eligible for funding t',e county must insure that the monies will be used immediately to begin alleviating jail problems. The Board of Corrections will only fund those pro acts that are ready to begin almost immediately. Projects facing significant political controversy and funding delays, will not be considered eligible for the funding cycle. In addition there is considerable support from the Superior Court Judges for the immediate construction of a permanent facility. I am recommending the Board take a positive position on the construction of the West Vglley jail facility today. FT: ps cc: Robert T. Older, 1st District Cal McElwain, 2nd District David L McKenna, 3rd District Robert 0. Townsend, 4th District Robert B. Rignoy, County Adnin. Officer (RTWVJA) t_ , l JAIL CAPACITY NEEDS West Valley 1980 - 1985 - 1987 - 1990 - 2000 - San Bernard 1980 - 1985 - 1987 - 1990 - 2000 - ATTACHMENT (Includes the 346 472 579 692 834 ino County 875 (Current 1,198 1,384 1,592 1,913 Fontana area) legal jail capacity is 890) POPULATION PROJECTIONS The population projections used in this study were provided by the Sothern growthuforecastsifo Ho averse SCAG i presents vtwo alternativergrowth forecasts - Draft SCAG 82A and Draft 828. In the Spring of 1982 the SCAG Executive Committee will adopt a new growth forecast - either 82A O 82B or a modified version conbining averages off 2A and For 8213. SCAGp82 projects sounly we have used an the population for the year 2000. Forecasts of the interim years are baser+ on the percentage growth as reported by SCAG 78. SCAG 82 forecasts an increase of 552,300 for the County in the year 2000 with 30% of this growth by 1985, 734 by 1990 and 879 by 1995. The population increase for West Valley is projected to be 279,700 in the year 2000 with 248 by 1985, 76% by 1990 and 97% by 1995. we must stress the fact that the above projections on the future West Valley jail capacity needs are based on the lowest population forecasts mailable. For example, SCAG 78 projected a population of 500,007 for the West Valley in the year 2000. estimateuof 590,000,.iseF'our months again Arevisedothe an percent[ increase ove SCAG r a82fouro y a9r ,period7 A We thousandths E havg to question whether SCAG ecnsidered the 198n census in their 82B revisions. August 1981 SAN BAG and the William C. Lawrence Company forecast the population of the West Valley to bg 704,000 in the year 2000. Even SCAG hedges considerably on their projections'- for the West valley in 2000; for yin their SCAG 82A Forecasts Choy prc9ict A population of AF7,rnr, T7•ti, wo must strew. that the SCAG projections appear low. A �A r ;2 n 7 k r 7 2 BOOKING RATIO 1:21 The booking ratio is established by dividing the population by the number of bookings. We have averaged this figure from 1975 - 1980. 0 ,,n Population - Bookings - Ratio 1975 595,064 34,043 1:20.45 1975 716,989 34,759 1:20.61 1977 737,914 35,141 1121.00 1978 764,789 35,235 1:21.71 1979 812,883 35,932 1:22.01 1980 874,200 38,060 1:22.97 12 6 - 21.46 We also determined the booking ratio of nine additional counties. The information was provided by the Department of Jjatice, through the Bureau of Criminal Statistics in their Criminal Justice Profile - 1980. Booking Ratio 1980 Alameda 1:13.9 Contra Costa 1:25.8 Los Angeles 1:17.8 Orange 1:20.3 Riverside 1:15.6 Sacramento 1:19.1 San Bernardino 1:23.2 San Francisco 1:12.6 San Diego 1 :16.6 S+,:ta Clara 1:23.5 188.4 a 10 1:18.84 The averaged booking ratio of the ten counties was 1:23.95 in 1971, an increase in the ratio of 21%, HOUSING FACTOR .028 The housing factor is determined by dividing the jail capacity by the number of bookings. The following table compares the housing factor for several years in San Bernardino County. Legal Booking Jail Housing Year Bookings Populatlon Ratio Cep. Factor Rating 1970 23,579 682,233 1:29 402 .017 Poor 1975 34,043 696,064 1:23 987 .028 Good 1976 34,799 716.989 1:21 987 .028 Good 1977 35,141 737,914 1:21 987 .028 Good 1978 35,235 754,789 1:22 890' .025 Fair 1979 36:,932 812,883 1:22 BOO .024 Pair 1980 38,060 874,200 1:23 890 .023 Fait 0 ,,n T• +Main all capacity reduced from 804 to 707 because of changes in minimum jail standards. The 1970 housing factor of .017 reflects the chronic overcrowded conditions of the old jail in the Courthouse. 1975 -1977 the factor is .028 and represents more modest housing conditionr. Then in 1978 the Department of Corrections reduced the legal Jail capacity by 91 beds. For the next three years the bookings increased 81 with a corresponding decrease in the housing factor. The 1980 housing factor of .023 represents jail a housing conditions that are close to capacity DAILY AVERAGE COUNT A method to determine future jail needs is to base the projections on the average daily count of the jail. The average daily count from 1979, 1980, and 1961 increased at an annual rate of 5 %. Projecting this 6% increase through the year 2000 shows a need for 1,d94 beds over the next 15 years. The problem with this method is that it is a straight line projection, and the population forecasts are net. As a result the capacity needs projected for a given period, especially early on, do not reflect the impact of the population explosion. INCREASING THE CAPACITY OF THE CENTRAL JAIL The Central Jail was designed to be expanded oy 400 cells. The study clearly shows that this erpansion of the jail will meet the capacity needs through the year 2000, with most of the +.dditio,. +1 space being required by +1990. 1.. 1978 the Board of Corrections set the legal capacity of the Central Jail at 707 (122 female and 585 male cells). The average daily population of the jail in. 1981 was 624. This r,•preseits a 104% occupancy factor of the male population. In adiition, all of the public and private agency [eports we studied forecasting the population trends in the county agree that the East valley is only three to five years behind the West Valley in its population explosion. To simply rely on an additional 400 cells at the Central Jail to nccommcdate the future needs would be foolish. CONVERTING SUBSTATION BOOKING STATIONS Presently, the substation booking stations are rated by the Board of Corrections as Type I facilities. Which r,eans they can be used for the detention of persons for 48 hours or less. To convert these b'ations to Type 12 facilities would be costly. For example, a Type I facility requires 60 square feet of floor space in a single cell. A Type it facility requires 70 square feet per coil. In additiop, each facility must have: a medical staff on duty 24 hours /day .., the capability of, preparing and serving three hot meals each day. ... recreational areas, day room and outsiCe compound ... beauty shop for female prisoners ... visiting areas TRANSPORTATION COSTS Transportation costs for pre - sentenced prisoners going to court will increase dramatically if- a jail is not built in the West Valley. By 1985, approximately $139,344 will be spent annually on court transportation; however, if the jail is built next to the courts instead of the holding facility, approximately $20,124 will be spent annually on court transportation. By 1990, if the jail is not built, it may cost approximately $204,742 *1 1995 the cost may be $300,834 *; and, by 2000, it may cost $442,023 *. By building the jail and not the holding facility within the Law t Justice Center, the County may expect to save in court transportatio„ costs $119,220* in 1985; $175,173* in 1990; $257,388* :n 1995; and $378,186 in 2000. Persons arrested in the field via a warran" or on -sight arrest, need to be transported to a booking facility. Should the Sixth and Mountain facility be closed and no booking facility provided at the new substation or holding facility, transportation costs for persons arrested will increase, affecting the Sheriff's and local police departments. The transportation cost for persons arrested in the field have been estimated for a fifteen (15) and thirty (30) mile round trip radius. By 1985, the costs may be $213,931 to 5427,863 *; 1990, between 5281,367 to $562,720 *; 1995, between 5301,829 to $603,659 *; and by 2000, between $348,031 to $696,062 *. The transportation costs for court returnees and pi- soners arrested in the field are based upon current maintenance /fue! costs and do not include anticipatory inflation costs or the addition /replacemen' of buses and vehicles. *Annual Costs ,+ (RTsPJN) 2- 23 -82 /ps "r �tf T 1fi ti SAN hJFI, BEANARDINO COUN7y SCM1 PR07ECTED ORCHIN *552.300 1 Growth 301 50.756 73% 87% ' 1980 .1985 1987 ]9. n 0 , Projected 1945 2O0O Population 892,500 1,048,190 ng l,le:2,792 1 P S,5 9 Ratio ,2 1,353,001 1,034,Bm 23.2 t. 1 21 21 Bookings 38,060 49,914 55,371 71 21 Factor 51,22, q 8,905 68,32e .023 Ja 1 Cap. •024 .025 .025 (890) B75 1,198 1,384 .027 •0719 i 6EST VALLEY 1,542 1,752 1,913 SC+.G PR4)ECTED GRO M *279,700 1 ;rowth 241 501 741 971 -980 1985 1987 1990 1995 Projected 2000 PO l,t 100 413,228 Boo 485,950 559,672 Ratio 22 9' 617,409 fi25,8CO C. 4 21 21 21 21 Bookin 15,067 14,578 - 23,140 23 us ng Factor 7.5,603 29,4(In 29,BCO Ja 0 =• .028 .025 .025 , Cap. (0 346 472 .027 .-02P CD7'IFtAI, JAIL 519 692 794 834 1980 1355 1987 1000 Projected )995 7000 r r Fo lrattlon 536,400 634,952 676,842 727,007 Aaelo4 22.97 745,592 * *809,000 21 21 7.1 21 Bodkin s 23,352 30,236 32,231 21 , Factor usng 34,619 35,504 38,524 .� a .023 .024 .025 Ca 537 725 .026 .027 .028 i "County - West Valley population 8O6 900 959 1,079 q ,t (Mspg) F' 2 -19 -82 r, F� (fr l� GLOSSARY Board of Corrections State Board of Corrections . shall establLsh minimt.a standards for local detention facilities . shall review such standards biannually, and make any ap2ropriate revisions (PC 4024- 5031.5). State Board of Corrections 600 Bercut Drive Se:ramento, CA 95814 (916) 445 -5073 Bookings � To "book" signifies the recordation of an arrest in official i� police records, and the taking by the police of fingerprints and ,,• photographs of the person arrested, or any of these acts following an arrest. For the purpose of this report booking C' refers also to the Incarceration of an individual In the San Bernardino Cointy Jdil system. i Booking Radio 1 :21 The numbe. of Individuals in a given population that will be booked in the San Berr =rdino County Jail. Expressed as one of every 21 citizens in t : County will be booked. The ratio is determined by dividing the population by the number of bookings. p Housing Factor .028 The housing factor Is the percentage of the total bookings for which the county must provide bed space and is determined by dividing thb jail capacity by the number of bookings. Legal Jail Capacity The number of prisoners that can occupy a cell, room, unit, building or facilty in compliance with the state's "Mini•num Standards" for Local Detention Facilities. Rating The rating - poor, fair, good - is used in relation with the housing factor and is an indication of the hot-sing conditions of the jail that existed from 1970 -1980. ' SAN BAG + San Bernardino Associated Governments V, 334 W. 3rd St., Suite 401 S; San Bernardino, CA 92401 884 -8276 SCAG Southern California Association of Governments 600 South Common%aalth Ave.,, Suite 1000 Los Anqeles, CA 90005 (213) 385 -1000 �4 I � .r. C. a 0 William C. L wrence Co. The Brad vey Building 304 Soul, Broadway, Suite 444 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213} 617 -0588 Pr:pared a report on population and employment forecasts for the West Valley for inclusion in "SCAG 82• - August, 1981. t' i �v a INTER - OFFICE MEMO 1982 9 March 1, err DATE '� ■ �'� FROM JOHN F. MICHAELSON PlIONE 1535 Administrative Analyst, CAD TO WEST VALLEY LAW i JUSTICE cc. RobertiB. Rig r y DEP;JiTMENTS Al Reid r. SUBJECT BOARD WORKSHOP - HEST VALLEY LAW 6 JUSTICE CENTER - MARCH 23, i982 March 23, 1982, at 2:00 p.m., in the Management_ conference ' Room in Building B -2 of the Aerospace Complex, 1111 East Mill Street, San Bernardino, the Board of Supervisors will hold a workshop on the Wost.Valley Law and Justice Center. Thn three main topics of the workshop will be the court building design and associated contracts, the Sheriff's report on West Valley jail facility needs and financing �)f the Center. Since our last meeting in February, the plan was reviewed a with the Rancho Cucamonga City Planning Commission. The only significant comment was the Planning Cownission's desire to sea a softening offset architecturally applied tc the north and weat exterior walls of the court nuildinq. This softening effect has been achieved with very minor impact to the interior flior plan of the building, as can be seen on the attached floor plan. This is the only change to the court facility design from what was presented in February to user dapartments. The basic interior plan remains the same as you last saw it. c. I would appreciate the attendance and support of all involved department representatives as there may be technical questions regarding decisions made in our earlier meetings. In addition to being a public Board session, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and news meLia have been invited to the workshop. Most of the matarial to be presented will not be available until Tuesday; however, I have included a portion of the n architect's drawings for your review. if you should have any comments or questions concerning the workshop, please feel free to call me at extension 1535. JFM1PkW Attachment +R o Jw'l.'M1 SAN �' LINO aCEEYT B 0114" \. .4Gnrn,v„h� Olft„ COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVC OFFICE camtr CMk e.U&M -Ent 1E7 Wit FIAftSVwt Sm 6. ,,"M. CA 92416 March 19, 19d2 171413617019 Jim Robinson Assn•. City Mcnager C.ry of Rancho Cucamonga P O. BOA 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Jim: WbOI aIQ1VCIU owtua..+ rr.,o.w, Ii0.�0.1w.�N e..wGna.o lWnt..wtw�.0 Nearest Confirming our conversation yesterday, we have scheduled a Hoard workshop on March 23, 1982, at 2:00 p.m., it the Aerospace Complex at 1111 East Mill Street, San Bernardino. The County Administrative Office and the Board of Suparviaors would like to invite the City Council and staff to atcond this workshop. The design of the court building and the overall site plan will oe presented, along with our land sale agreement for Hoard approval. As you requested, I have enclosed color reproduction of elides of the proposed project anc hope that they will adequately demonstrate our effort to add!esn your Planning Conmission's desires to soften the north and west walls of the building. tie feel that this revised design addresses that need without making signifioant interior changes to the building floor plan. I hope that this information reaches you in Ample time for dissemination to your Council and staff. If you should have f +:rther comme -te or gtestiol,a, pleaso contact me at 383 -1535. Sincerdly, JOHN P. 141 'S0'4N' County Project Representative JPM :pkw Enclosure cc: Superv'_Dor Robert J. Townsend Supevvisor Cal A.- Elwain Robert H. Rigney . t � MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ; TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1982 WEST VALLEY LAW b JUSTICE CENTER: SITE PUtH 6 DESIGN APVD: CO /CITY LAND SAL. AGREEMENT 82.113 W/CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA: AGREEMENT 80- 358 -A9 W/HETCALF ibiCwiCATION OF DETENTION FACIL. APPADIMPt t The Board of Supervisors conducts a Workshop to hear racosmandations re- lating to the proposed West Valley Lrw and Justice Center. County Adminiatrative Officer Robert Rigney indicates departments who will be affooLed are represented at this meeting. He states it is the intent to wore with the courts for the interior design of the proposed buildinb and to maintain the bast of relationships while providing an opptianm program. He states the financing concerns have been answered ttu gh working with Merrill Lynch financial consultants, which firs has a proposal for fundlna. Representing tba architect, Dill Ballantins presents slides of the new buildLag and displays a model. Those present co=ant favorably with exception of Supervisor Older who does not Like the design of the building. Judges Merriam of the Municipal Court and Morris of Superior Court indicate opposition to the proposed retention of the existing courts facility at Sixth and Mountain in Ontario. Following the presentation and discussion, on motion by Supervisor McElwain, socondad by Supervisor McKenna and carried, the following action is takdn: 1. Apptovaa the Site Master Plan and Sciiamatic DesiGn as presented, subject to user acceptance; 2. Approvos the County /City Land Sale Agreement #82 -113 with Ciity of Rancho Cucamonga; 3 Apprcvas Amendment IL to Agreement 30 -358 with Metcalf 6 Eddy, Inc. /m authorizing a fixed fee of $1,123,475.00 for construction mantoement services and a not -to -be exceeded $706 055.00 for rela�iw cetla axpenens and a not -to -be exceeded $22,504.00 for inspection services if authorized. Relating to Racu=mdatien D for retention of existing courts facility at Sixth and M.;;ntain in Ontario, the Board defers consideration of that item to a later datfi. PASSED AND =2TED by the 3oard of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, Stare of California, by the following vote: AYES: near, McElwcin, McKonna, Hammack HOES Ilene ABSMrL; 7awa9aad 1 _ (Continued) a MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Page 2 _ Wlat Valley Law and Justice Canter ebo The Boar needs@ the Sheriff's report on the West Valley detsntiou 0•, motion by Supervisor McElwain, seconded by Supervisor older and crrried, the Board approves the its indicates asisu ofr the f detention facility at the Emehe Cucceongh• Ducd directs the Count Administrative Office Facilities; further, to continus to work with .n Sheriff's office to secure alternative financing sources. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors o£vt votes of San Bernardino. State of California, by the following AYES: McElwain, Older, Nasaock NOES: None a ABSENT: McUnna, Townsend l The Board hears a report by John Fitzgerald of Merrill Lynch on • county Gowarnmant Centsraflnancing. Me long tare tax exmaPt x for the downtown canter and financing; use of short term financing long term on tl•s West End building; note i8aulong term ehrcughlY funds to pay for one building and financing issue for the other. He recommend 30 �b1a 1 of debts service with term tax execmpt financing equal payments on an annual basis. 8 Mr. Fitzgerali identifies various sources of revenue and following discussion. on motion by Supervisor Hh and the alternative financing Older and carried, the Board, having roves proposals LS prepared by Merrill Lynch financial consultants, aPp proceeding with preparation of official statement baoedoon the Merrill program for the Caunty GO vrrusnt Center building i'. L ch analysis. _ _ - � ... �.a ...�. of she Cnunt9 of— a 0" Y�J WEST VALLEY LAW 6 JUSTICE CENTER WORKSHOP AGENDA March 23, 1982 1. Courthouse design and associated agreements. Recommendations: i.. Approve the Site Master Plan and Schematic Design as presented, subject to user -,cceptance. D. Approve attached County -City Land Sale Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. Approve attached amendment to the Metcalf i Eddy, Inc /CM contract #80 -358, which authorizes a fixed fee of $1,123,475.00 for construction management services and a not - to-be- exceeded $706,055.00 for reimbursable expenses and a not- to- be- excczled $272,504.00 for inspection services if authorized. D. Approve the attached concept of meeting court- room neads in the West Valley, which presumes the retention of the existing courts facility at Sixth a Mountain in Ontario. 1 6 y. �P? vJ fTD • �ti 2. Review Sheriff's report on West valley detention facility needs. Recommendation: `b Approve site location of the 'detention facility at the Rancho cucamonga site and indicate cupport for adequate detention facilities, and direct the Administrative Office to continue to work with (" the Sheriff's Office to secure alternative £inanc- t� inq sources. s L, I� r a 3. Recommendations: A. Review alternat -ve financin: proposals as prepared by Merrill Lynch financial consultants for both the West Valley Law and Justice Center and the San,Bernardino County Center. B Approve proceeding with preparation of official If'� -- statement for long -term financing program for the Cou:tty Government Center building based on the Merrill Lynch analysis. W, t= r' Y -e3 „ ♦ �' 'fit .�.oart...W�9.. YWr /iYyvyT e YervY,wr ,Fa,0. Tww�M q✓Nywq SAN . DINO RCBEBTB NICNEY C/fww bm�ro,mnw COVNTV ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Cwmy Civk!3 "N Ea[ 157 Wert FIhhSVM March 19, 1982 Sm9w 1..CA97015 47141a9a791e Jim Robinson Asst City Manager - City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Jim: .�.oart...W�9.. YWr /iYyvyT W 4,Nn YervY,wr ,Fa,0. Tww�M q✓Nywq 14<a,l MwiwO. Nww AM 14, Confirming our conversation yesterday, we have scheduled a Board workshop on March 23, 1982, at 2:00 p.m., in the Aerospace Complex at 1111 East Mill Street, San Bernardino. The County Administrative Office and the Board of Supervisors would like to invite the City Counci: and staff to attend this workshop. The design of the court building and the overall site plan will be presented, along with o,7r land sale agreement for Board approval. As you requested, I have enclosed color reproduction of el =des of the proposed project and hope that they will adequately demonstrate our effort to address your Planning Cormission's desires to soften the north and west walls of the building, we feel that this revised design addressee that need without making signifioant interior changes to the building floor plan.. I hope that this information reaches you in ample time for dissemination to your Council and staff. If you should have further comments or questions, please contact•, me at 383 -1535. Sincerely, (// �J / JOHN P. MZCHAELSO'� County Project Representative JFM:pkw Enclosure cc: Supervisor Robert 0. Townsend Supervisor Cal McElwain Robert B. Rigney 2A PROJECT ggpMPTM 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION The Proposed Law and aWstice Center site ancortnusa 25.S acres In the central portion of the City of Rancho C,,xanmga The site s bardesed by Haven Avenue an the west, Atpen Street an the east, and Civic Center Drive on the soath. The site is approximately 50C feet south of Foothill Boulevard and is within thp area referred to as the Rancho i Cucamonga Business Park. The regional locotlon ed project boundaries are shown In Figure I and 2. ,a 2.2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTIC. The Law and Justice Center Is a joint City of Rancho Cucannngo /County of Son • Bernardino complex. The individual elements of the Center includes Structure _ Size City Flail BS,000 sq.ft. Courts Building 225,000 sq.ft. Detention Facility 275,000 sq.ft. Police / Sheriff Substation 30,000 sq.ft. t Cultural Center 10,00D sq.ft. 625,000 sq ft. The Courts Building will house a total of eighteen courtrooms, including Mcciclpol and Superior Courts, and offices for related factions rich as the District Attomey's office. The City Flail will include the offices of the City, Planing Department. Council Chambers and City Clerks office. Daytime prison&• detention will Initially be housed in the Court*s basement with eventual construction of a 700.1.000 bed County Pre -trial detention facility. The Pallce /Sheriff substation will serve as both a City facility ad County facility. This faciliy, will Include administrative offices, locker and other facilities for patrolmen, and provisions for minimal short term detention of arrestess. Approximately 500,000 square feet of the ultimate tote! development will be used for County facilities and 125,000 square feet for City purpowm The Center will provide approximately 1,435 parking spaces tar employes and visitors at various locations throughout the site. The configuration of lad uses within the proposed Law and Justice Center are stows In Figure I Phasing Initial construction will Include the City Hail, Courts Building, PoliQdSherlff Substation. The County Pre -trial Detention Facility and the Cultural Center we expected to be completed within 5.10 yeas. 4 i 2k rq - L�-c 1 I ,a M.NUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Page 2 - West Valley Law and Justice Center --loo The Board hears the Sheriff's report on the West Valley detention facility needs. j On motion by Supervisor McElwain, seconded by Supervisor Older and carried, the Board approves the site location of the detention facility at the Rancho Cucsmonga site and !.ndicates support for adequate detention i facilities; further, the Board directs the County Administrative Office to continue to work with the Sheriff's office to secure alternative financing sources. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, by the following vote: AYES: McElwain, Older, Hammock NOES: Nona ABSENT: McKenna, Townsend The Board hears a report. by John Fitzgerald of Merrill Lynch on the four alternatives for the West Valley Law and Justice Center and the Comity Government Center financing, He explains long term tax exempt financing; use of short term financing for thn downtown center and long term on the West End building; note issue; use of available funds to pay for one building and financing over a long term through bond issue for the other. He recommends that both be financed with long term tax execmpt financing with a 30 year level of debt service with equal payments on an annual basis. Mr. Fitzgerald identifies various sources of revenue and following discussion, as motion by Supervisor McElwain, aeconded by Supervisor Older and carried, the Board, having heard the alternative financing proposals as prepared by Merrill Lynch financial consultants, approves proceeding with preparation of official statement for long -term financing program for tha County Government Center building based on the Merrill Lynch analysis. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, by the fol:cwing vote: AYES: Older, McElwain, Ha>iwck NOES: None ABSENT: McKenna, Townsend 1""? -101 M. IM 3/23/82 Vkshp. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 K ^AUNTY OF SAN BERNAP'nNO 1, ANDREE DISHAROO . Ckfk of the Bosfd of SLpmIsm of San 5"%np o Carry, Cslifomis, tomby cwdfy ttw fev"mIne to at s NII, trn snd cafvat copy of"Head of the attlon nken by Mid 9osfd of Svpurbon, by vole of m. mambas Mff L � 'ti i" in On Offklal Mm In of Mid Baal of its rnvsdne o/ pwe 3/25/6." AD �• ?��r 1DREE DISHAROON cc: CAO -John Michaelsoi w/4 Agreaments (82- 11391irkofmWIlowd for Rancho C, "amonga signatures CAO -J. Michaelson w/2 agree(80 -358 AB1) IAitOr W /agrY (tom -358 A =)i Cuncractora C/O J. MSychaelson: °+°a