Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986/12/17 - Agenda Packet
w7insr (MT OF RANCHO GLC'ANEWA CrrY COUNCIL AGENI)k Lions Park Community Center 9161 ease Line load Rancho Cucamonga, California December 17. 1986 - 7,30 p.m. All items submlttad for the City Council Agmsdn anat M In writima. Ike deadline for ssbmitting thnae its" Is 5 :00 p.m. om the Wednesday prior to the meetlog. 7be City Clark's 0ffico receives all suck hams. A. CAM TO ORM 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. loll Calls Brava _, Buquet _, Stout King _, and Aright z} it. mIIOaSeemm /FRummiTfoll i 1. Thursday, December 18, 1986 - 7:30 p.m. - PARR D89ELOPMENT COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. ±yv C. COMIN" CAL1NOat F� The following Consent Calendar items are arpected to be ' routine and am- controraraial. They will Le acted upon by the Council at one time witbcut discussion. Any its my i R be removed by a Comcilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register No'a. 12/3/66 and 1 12/10186 and Payroll ending 11/13/86 and 11/26/86 for the total mount of 92,127,358.13. 2. Approval to receive and file current Iovestnent 8 Schedule as of November 30, 1986. r, F s City Council Agenda -2- December 17, 1966 3. Approval of Imprcvesent agreement and improvement 20 severity and release of improvement agreement and Improvement veracity accepted by City Council 00 October 15, 1966, for Tract 12932 located east of Haven Avenue, vest of Deer Creek Channel and mouth of HIShland Avenue, submitted by Clenfed Development Corporation. RESOLOTION NO. 66 -351 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12952 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY ACCEPTED ON OCTOEEN 15, 1966 46 Approval of Parcel Map 10233 located at the northeast 36 corner of Sixth Street and Raven Avenue, submitted by Arical Properties, Incorporated. SESOLUTION NO. 66 -352 39 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP MOMSER 10223 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10223) 5. Approval of summary vacation of an unused portion of 40 the City drainage easement located east of Jasper Street at Vicars Drive. RESOLUTION 00. 66 -353 44 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM03CA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING TEE VACATION OF A PORTION OF A CITY DRAINAGE EASEMENT 6. Approval of map, improvement agreement and improvement 45 '.• security foe parcel map 9646, located at the northeast ¢ corner of Moonstone Avenue and Hillside Road, submitted by Dr. Irwin Golden. RESOLUTION No. 86 -354 57 A RESOLUTION OF TER CITY COUNCIL OP THY CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 9646, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. %46). IMPROVEMMT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY Y City Council Agenda -3- y 7. Approval to award the improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Atchison, Topeka ■OJ Santa Fe Railroad north of 8th Street to the apparent louest responsible bidder, Bruce Paving Company for the amount of 072,319.00. 8. Approval of sup, lmproiesOut agreement and improvement ry" security for Tract 13062 located north of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archibald Avenues, submitted by j. Liucolu Progerty Company, R.C. Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -355 A REBGLUrION• or THE CITY COUNCIL OF TV% CITr OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORBrA; APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREDUCIT, IMPEOVEMpMS SWCDRITY. AND FINAL NAP OF TRACT N0. 13062 9. Approval of sap tKyrovemumt agreement and Improvement security for Tract No. 13 19 1 10 "red as the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street, submitted by Lewis flames. RESOLUTION NO. 66 -356 A RESOLUTION OF TUB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIrORNIA, APp20VI3G IMPROVEMENT AGAR-'J =T, INtROVRRNT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13191 10. Approval of a resoluti= amending the unit "Mat !or fees in lieu of underilreunding existing overbesd telephone lines. RE80LDTIOR IMO. 86 -143 -4 A RESOLUTION 01' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION N0. 86 -143 ESTABLISSivo PEES IN LIRS OP UNDERCROUNOIMG OVERHEAD UrILITT LINES WHEN REQUIRED BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL 11. Apprmll of "Pemit to Coustruct a 24" Stars Drain vithin ■ 30" Steel Casing" from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company for the Archibald Avenue Railroad Crossing (No. BBO- 322.90) widening north of G Base Line Road December 17,1986 58 60 71 72 82 f 83 -J.' i 87 88 } Y • i b a •� aa>/�aaaem ....z : r .�' Six City Council Agenda -4- December 17, 1966 +. �A RESOLUTION NO. P6 -357 97 + A RESOLUTION Or TEH CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CY,Ironu, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A TWENTY -POOR (24) INCH RAIN WITESII A THIRTY (30) INCR STEEL CASINO BE1W6P11 TRR SOUTERRN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND TEE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR Till ARCHIBALD AVENUE RAILROAD CROSSING (H0. ISO - 522.90) WIDENING POSTS Or EASE LINE ROAD ,t 12. Approval of professioul services agreement tar 98 predesign aligmeot and cost comparative study for the 'V Turner- Rermoas Eton Drain vitb Williamson 6 Schmid Conaultial Civil Rngineere sed Land Surveyors for an ' amount of 016,900.00 to 6e funded from the Drainage Fund. J RpOLOTIOM N0. 66 -356 112 A RESOLUTION or TRl CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CGCAMMA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGRRLYENT FOR FlED6gIGW ALIGNMENT AND COST CONFIXATIV6 STUDY FOR SHE TURNER -RUMBA STORM RAIN WITH NILLIANNal A ECHIID CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS ' 13. Releane of Sonde and Notice of Completion: 113 Tract 12316 -1 (Base Line load) Ar Accept: J ' Maintenance Guarantee load (Street) 0 45,630.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 4456,300.00 RESOLUTION 30. 86 -359 115 , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 07 TBE CITY •. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNI4, ACCEPTIRG it 193 PUBLIC IMPROVE1E,tTS FOR TRACT 12316 -1 AND , AOIHRIEINO THE PILING OF A NOTICE Or 1 CO"LETION :7R TES Wnll , Cr, `1I p 1 .r 4A a t- i `1 I 1 r, ,1 v, ,, 5 zit City Council Agenda -5- December 17, 198E a 14. Approval of Improvement Ettenaioo Agreement for Parcel 116 Yap 9498 located on the northeast corner of Wven Avenue and fourth Street, submitted by Reiter Rinler Gateway. ENO. 122 RESOLUTION 86 -360 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONRA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROTOWT rMINOION AGREEWT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 9498 15. Approval of the coucuptual design plan for a five acre 123 neigbborhood pack (West Creenuay Park) in the Terra Vista's Plsunod Crmamaity. 16. Approval of snbscriptioa to League of California 127 Cities' telecoruaications Natwork, CITYLINE, providing for Legislative database and City -to -City netvorkirt. Total tort of installst Lou and subscription not to etc sod 02,000 for remainder of 1986 -87. 17. Approval of adjustments to the animal control .ontract 129 with the County of Stu Bernardino allwf-ag for an animal control ofticer designated for Rancho Cucamonga. The City Council bas allocated funds for this increased level of service in the 1986 -87 budget. (CONTINUED FROM. 12/3/86 ArENDA - REVISED CONTRACT WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE 12/17/66 MEETING) 18. Approval to accept title to a tau foot strip of land 140 located generally east of Vincent to the Santa To land track consisting of syprotimately 1/2 acre. After January It 1987, it In orticipated that the property donation will be transferred to the Rancho Cue"0110 Community Foundation. 19. Approval of authorisation to purchase INS Computer 142 Equipment in the amount of 04,200 for porpoaes of leyielative tracking, cable television, mobile home rent data and other administrative research. 20. Set public hearing - January 7, 1987 - Appeal of Undergroundiug Overhead Utility Condition required by the Planning Comaission on November 12, 1986 for tentative Parcel Map No. 10237. r, ,1 v, ,, 5 zit �. City Council Agenda -6- December 17, 1986 21. get public hearing - January 21, 1987 - Cousideratiou of issuing a non- erclosiwe permit for the collection and disposal of commercial and industrial refuse within the City of Eaecbo Cucamonga to Rusts Hauling. D. CO•RSl UM- WAFCEN IM following Ordimances base Mad Pablie besrimp at the time of first reading. Sncond reedlags are erpeetad to boo Comtizi and mereast_o►Kaitl. They will be acted spas by the Coaecil at one time withont discussion. The City Clerk will read tbo title. A" itar can be rearmed for direassiaw. g0 ITS" SUBNITTAD 1. ISVYTtSRD FERRIC REARI " I. PEIRWHIMUL ANS39PWT AND TA1�319E TRACT 11,1!'1-= 143 VAIJW CONSTRUCTION - Appeal of Planning =l!sIs decision requiring a 15 toot lout equestrian trail eaament on the west aide of lots 14 and 13 - APN 1047- Lil -01, 02, 03{ 1062 -011 -02, 031 1062- 161 -01. 2. RgVI6V OF RED�ACO L NOD8INC POLICIES RtTORT 155 AND APPROVE ROUSING POLICIES UJORT. RESOLUTION HO. 86 -361 165 L REOO..UTION Of IRS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING HOUSING POLICY RETORT OF RARCNO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMXT AGENCY UNDER IN'IEQNAL REPERUE CODE SECTION 103A AND DIRECTING ITS PUBLICATION 3. REVI6V OF CITE 00119I90 FOLLIES REPORT AED APPROVE 167 HOUSING POLICIES REPORT. RESOLUTION 90. 86 -362 175 A 4MOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR11I4, APPROVING HOUSINU POLICY REPORT OF THR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA UNDER INTERNAL REVENUE COM SECTION 103A AND DIRECTING ITC PUBLICATION o City Council Agenda -7- December 17, 1966 4. R13XDZPTIAL 11}099 RAIE RM3W - Ban Bernardino County 177 has increased (effective January 1, 1987) tho landfill (dump) fee from $6.00 to $6.60 per too. This 435 incresce in the landfill fee and a 5105 Increase in liability insurance ban created a major impact on the residential refuse baulere. The requested rate adjustment is from 16.95 to 67.95 per mouth for basic residential refuse service. This is the first request for a rate review in 38 months (last rate adjustment was In October, 1983). [ESOLUTION NO. 86 -363 181 A 19SOLUTION Or IRS CITY COUNCIL 01" THE CITY OF RANCHO LOCANOHCA. CALIFORNIA, SITTING MAXIMUM RATO FOR. REHIMT AL REFUSE COLLUCTINO VITM 781 CITY Of lUCRO CUCAMONGA M _ . . NO ITEMS EMITTED 1. REPORT 11CUDIRO STA7US 011 P10}ONED COUNTY JAIL - ns Q1�L RN O VILL lg }[1NRNTED IT LAURA( VUSBRNU, ( CONTINSED }RUN 1213186 MI[YD10) 2. STATUS 0} }00TETLL BOUL"my 8p3C3}IC -W =. 200 ),rvvng I. CITY COUNCIL C0101IT711 "POINTMENIN (W I M7.00D AN O 211 '01TNERN CALIFORNIA nm ,COM"ITT[B). (CO:TIMM PROMO 12/3/86 MEITIRC) 2. SIP01T 710N COONC7L 503COMITTER (BROV11 L_0 0.OEf) ON Te�p1SORT COM01I88Id1. (CONTINUED RoN 11/3/86 1oSE718C) 3. DISCOSSI011 07 Pale Dj}l:.tlP Y CdD1I8SI0E APFOINTMENTS. (CONTINUED }ROM 12/3/a5 MHETINC) aa, City COYCtil dYeada -a- J, rmr. L the tim and Plata for ton A* those Which City C.."ll. Items to N dittuaaC public to 4 de met elswdy Appear ac chin ag=4. wra are C2e' eaa�sy baby yo "t. City Clark of the City o7 tcreplu aaaadc uw '"7 that a true, accurate Copy fwted eeawty -t" (72) beat. cn et 4e the Matins fez A.S. 2674 at 5720-C lcse Lits toad. clot 0 Deccrber 17, 19&6 5 z G 'N _ or yQ RANdio MrAAMGA c REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA. 177 Lions Park Community Coster 9161 Bane Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Orcemher 17._1986 — 7M a.e. 8, cgtt ZQg� 1. Roll Call: Rrova _, Rugeet _, Stout Ring _, and Wright _. I, COINTMI CAMIM The following Ccaaeat Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. 'n+ey will bo acted opoe by the Rh► at we time eithost di•ousaiam. Aay item may be removed by a Counc(lwebar or member of the wdienem for discrossiw. 1. Approval to r,ceive and file current Iaveatuent Schedule as of Dacenber 11, 1986. ' 2. Approval of sporaorship participation in the inland Sup(re Vest Dconooic Development Conference on January 30, 1987. The Redevelopment Agency had budgeted funds for this conference. '` , Fy ADJODtRIQfT s �t. 3 s� �,l�t i i ((JJ, 1 r. at , ri 7Y CITY OF RANCHO WCAMO REDEVELOPMENT AGENC MEMORANDUM DATE December 11, 1986 Tot Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FRONt Jim Hart, Treasurer SUBJECTS Receive and File - Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Investment Schedule Stotna Report as of December 11, 1986 RANCHO CUCAMnNGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY INVESTMENT BCR8DULS STATUS [RPORT PURCHASE MATURITY INTEREST IR�TIUTION DATE OkTa ANnONT RATE LAIF 02128/e6 as needed 5,000,000.00 07.512 Great Western 06/06/66 12129/66 1,188,291.25 07.050 Greet Western 10/06/86 07/07/87 700,000.00 05.800 First Trust Back 04/07/86 04/07/87 500,000.00 06.600 Royal Oaks e 6 L 11/19/86 11/19/81 100,000.00 06.750 Coast S&L 10/20/86 01/20187 100,000.00 06.000 Westport Savings 10/20/96 10/20/87 100,000.00 06.900 Security Fedbrsl 10/20/86 10/20/81 100,000.00 06.600 Eastern S&L 10/20/86 10/20/87 100,700.00 07.000 Mercury S&L 04/24/86 11/24/87 100,000.00 07.250 Mutual S&L 04/24/85 01/23/87 100,000.00 07.000 Secure 8U. 04/24/86 04/24/87 100,000.00 08.000 County Savings Bank 04/24 -86 04/24/87 100,000.00 07.075 Lincoln Am S&L 04/24/86 12719/86 100,000.00 07.700 Back of America 04/28/86 04128/87 500,000.00 06.775 Glendale Federal 04/28/86 12/12/86 100,000.00 07.250 First Federal Her Sank 04/30/86 04/30187 1C0,000.00 07.700 Centurion Savings 10/27186 10/27/87 100,030.00 06.600 r '.750 ; y .150 .750 .650 .600 .375 .512 .700 .750 .625 :950 .750. .625 t v ti. 4 t ,.�� . . .`'�� d� . �, i. 1 r? i :i ;� �•Ms; ,.�. i ��. ti��kk�. �� �r �� �� �_ Q v ■e A• CIi,L.10 %= 1. Roll Callt Crown _, Euquet __, Stout Ring —, and Wright _. 11. Conur'SAMM The folleviug Ce1166st Calendar itnr arc expected to be routise ■ad son- eostroveratal. They will be setaA xpom by the RAb at 0114 tine without discussion. Aay its nay be removed by a Councilxaaisr or memo r of the asdleace for distension. 1. Approval cc receive and file rnrrett investment Schedule to of December 11, 1986. 2. Approval of spom0rahip participation in the inland Empire West Economic Development Conference on January 30, 1987. The Redevelotment Agency had budgeted funds for this conference. 3 p. Eusp REl'ORT7 E. ADJDDUSmr r, ,Z:.SY -�:S �. �wa'�S`tj:''.- •�'.i� `:: i ?, - ., rm�� ^4 °nt¢".iLS�; L tt� 7 MY GP RANCHO CLC.AAIUNGA o ` REDEVEWPIMENT AGENCY AGENDA tin Lions Perk Community Center 9161 Ease Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California tom,; mber 17. 1966 - 7,00 pd A• CIi,L.10 %= 1. Roll Callt Crown _, Euquet __, Stout Ring —, and Wright _. 11. Conur'SAMM The folleviug Ce1166st Calendar itnr arc expected to be routise ■ad son- eostroveratal. They will be setaA xpom by the RAb at 0114 tine without discussion. Aay its nay be removed by a Councilxaaisr or memo r of the asdleace for distension. 1. Approval cc receive and file rnrrett investment Schedule to of December 11, 1986. 2. Approval of spom0rahip participation in the inland Empire West Economic Development Conference on January 30, 1987. The Redevelotment Agency had budgeted funds for this conference. 3 p. Eusp REl'ORT7 E. ADJDDUSmr r, ,Z:.SY -�:S �. �wa'�S`tj:''.- •�'.i� `:: i ?, - ., rm�� ^4 °nt¢".iLS�; 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO REDEVELOPMENT ACENC MEMORANDUM DATE December 11, 1986 '@ C} TOi Chairmau and Members of the Nedevelopment Agency PROM: Jim Hart, TrPasurer SUBJECT: Receive and Pile — Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopmea, Agency Investment Schedclo Status Report us of Decu,.ber 11, 1986 RANCRO CUCIA MCA RRDRpELOFwM1T ACENt;Y IN T SCHEDME STATUS REPORT PURCHASE MATURITY INTEREST INSTITUTION DATE _DATE _ AMOUNT RATE _ LAIy 02/28/56 as needed 3,000,000.00 07.512 Great Western 06/06/86 12129/86 1,188,291.25 01.050 ;r Great Western 10/06/86 07/07/87 500,000.00 05.800 First Trust Bank 04/07/86 04/07/87 500,000.00 06.600 Royal Oaks 8 6 L 11/19/86 11/19/87 100,000.0^ 06.750 Coast SAL 10/20/86 Ul/20/87 10,060.00 06.000 Westport Savings 10/20/86 10/20/87 100,000.00 06.900 Security Federal 10/20/86 10120/07 100,000.00 06.600 Eastern S&L 10 /20 /d6 10/20/87 100,000.00 07.000 Mercur7 S&L 04/24/86 11/24/87 100,000.00 07.250 Nutuel S&L 04124/86 01/23/87 100,000.00 (17.000 Secure S&L 04/24/86 04124/e7 100,000.09 08.000 County Savings Bank 04124 -66 04/24/87 100,000.00 07.875 1, LinLolu Am 86L 04124/86 12119/86 100,000.00 07.700 Hank of America 04/28/86 04/20/81 500,000.00 06.775 ►' Glendale :e, cal 04/28/86 12/12/86 100,000.00 07.250 pr first Pedersl Sav Bonk 04130/86 04130187 100,000.90 07.70' Centurion Seszage 10127/86 10/27/87 100,000.00 05.600 '@ C} M 07 10 10 10/31/86 11/06/86 Grand Total 87 100,000.00 06.750 87 Del Air S&L 08.150 Cal America S&L 300,000.0 Encino BAL ` Great Pacific SSL � Brookside SAL - Great Weatera S&L 86 Great Western S&L 06.850 Pacific Savings Baal, 500,000.00 Com.cunity Bank 87 Nat Bank of Catalina 07.500 Southwest Bank 500,000.00 Nat Bank of LaJolla ` San Clemente S&L 06.250 Pacific Coast 851 200,000.00 Bait of America B6 Bank of America - Centurion Savings 100,000.00 Irvine City SAL 87 LAID 07.250 Downey 8 A L 500,000.00 Canino Heal S&L BI Commerce 9avinas 05:450 Calif Fed SAL 100,000.00 Bank of America 17 New America Savings 06.375 As of 12/11/86 M 07 10 10 10/31/86 11/06/86 Grand Total 87 100,000.00 06.750 87 100,000.00 08.150 87 300,000.0 07.750 87 100,000.00 07.875 87 100,000.00 07.900 86 500,000.00 06.850 87 500,000.00 06.950 87 500,000.00 07.500 86 500,000.00 06.850 87 100,000.00 06.250 07 200,000.00 07.650 B6 100,000.00 06.250 B7 100,000.00 07.375 87 99,0011.00 07.250 57 500,000.00 05.400 BI 500,000.00 05:450 57 100,000.00 06.600 17 100,000.00 06.375 led 27,984,000.00 07.512 57 100,000.30 06.700 A 100,000.00 05.750 17 99,000.00 06.625 17 I00,000.00 05.950 A 500,000.00 05.750 A 100,000.00 05.625 42,170.291.25 S .a CITY OP RANCFtp CUCAATp(vG9 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1996 TO: Chairman and N FROM: embers of Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, Coawnity Development Director BY: Mika Bratt . Assistant Planner SUBJECT INLAID EAPIRE WEST ECOWIC DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE I• RECD rent ATION; Staff recommends approval of the par c pa on n the Inland Empire West Economic DevelA?eent ConPere with One additional 5750 30, 1987. Sponsorship is 52250 Agency hasobudgeted funds for this confere nceisplay materials. :q+onses. The Redevelopment II BACKGROUND; In previous years annum econcaic development con %erehe Citywnsored b Earyire West (IEW), a loosely organized coalition f cities (Ontario. Chino y the Inland COwtrce, deveto rsntana, and Rancho Cucaagnna), Chambers of the west end of S ' brokers and title companies, located in City's RDA a budgeted as In funds for t en annual economlcidevelopmth conference, and in r year, the conference planning. P evious years, staff has participated in The and mph taithi year will be on opportunities for economist and author development. Arthur LaPfer, commercial and answer format ' will be the keynote speaker. ' e well known feature the roles panel' in the mornfn and question economic development government, mpire.g and real estate iin Dment in the Inland Empire. Sponsorship costs $2,250. An additional f750 1s needed for display materials In the City booth, As a sponsor the City will receive: • A booth In the display photo display, video and /or sifhe City will provide a handouts. Presentations, and ai �;1 IREDEVEer17 T AGENCY STAFF REPORT nlaundM 11, 1996 , Page 2 E�D1re Nest Economic Development • 1 site he a bus tour place on February 26, Including the Citill featttireathe Haven Avenue Corridor Y Hall site. • Inclusion inrt Mrofndfs j material _ the City wfli oe featured brochure. P Y Pages in the conference • A reserved table with 10 seats . includes lunch. III. ANALYSIS• re in Prevfous years, ti., high visibilit 7Ta'ndpire Kest conference Provides a economic development o for, to th f the Purpose of the confereOpportunities In Rancho Cuc showcase develop a strong pax end e• consfstlnt Nth th8 Ci�nga• The RespectfiztL- CO'OunItY ploleent bise. Y S goal to ack Lam Develolarent Director JL:MB :sgr i . I I 1 I I rn _ y Wn Ua PM�rQ�OI d2PP en ;Y W �I1 m Tm CCnC COOZ�T Dirm-rTl� ~I vY�t OI Im P In nI aV•r T•••nn NSnfn DY<nr C yrYr y f� vYYY yT T.• OTZr n< r3• >T _ ;.. -.a a <Inr <SSSOCATTT OmFn OmnA Y v OI I ^2rNYY nCOpp S•19mTA N^ Za1 I: y Rmn.•: T� TL2�>� ^Z< -nC�T T < nn TnA cr mm�mr T�'ci^ i n ,i ^ r"" sY YYy nnazn <acm.a� _ T _ �• oammmrzNc n Y r.0 11j• > O_n nn m- N• ?ZmT ,air nr .am >y `• C_ of Dam 000 <nCrN•'r�r^a•n ,N� TZG n r ^Q �i�I•YIn nfZ'na N ^Oa ^iceIn T M C ' In '•'m' n 4naDDti ni'�Nr +OI >� _ I^'rr m .. r•A• ' -t• In In 1 NY u'In v n O N n II °rye Im,I � m �I i 1 '= �y�• �J. I = nl In Uhum v,Y'• :•T ira or nn n�i •<ri• .r•z F CI ; ••nPfi$ T'r•'7•:.< sY�c•Tn Yz •n I '^ r�1jT�jr I ix,iy�oi ��m7N 'yi °z •• In of i mY r^�C9 e�s'll n,iT~ w0•m'J •n.•F. 7 I ZNl +ni �• 1•I �D 13Q1D I,- N T I In N`el ra ai .mn In r oAs rry• Y I �^ n r'nn nn^+• +m nn n,+ a • +n N ; r =I n n3� }}!• -Ti•l Sai , rrr^wI .rrZi w r nypym aT nrs AaI N. In z - r .D- • a In •y In i +M N -- -- — qq•• W�� --�cu� ;E ; •"� .<- •�.�`onaaa�a'yo vrn °n�Li:�i'm ur. u•yrZrry..r ra a..' ;> i° -3•>� Nrn f•. us •.N os e.,�T .ya n• -.. -_ > e n m In nur'.i:- •:'naafi pa:NNa�1�°•a'ri•.".: %i.'.N'ov i� + +li•• � nI ;> •' r.W MUn m•.ar:.mNm UmM�pi•n la7 •.n ONnf C ^ ;i uTOOr}NniPnMNW VuNNPmnC J••n On Of,n n' O I • 1 •. a< •+* VTT ' I r N�mmrNTT 90 ?�i rom_ i Amr r L NI , rt(^w � rlV Of CIO - I $ I i I r I v srv{.T ar�nr x, n .p. Nr 2 A ♦ y . . r . ���_�NW r1.r _ � `�`r•� ���: �1r .IT OO YYr.`I I LST•i.L�,t il�,n n 1 N 1 r _( .w. LAO mN xo= o. %F ^g •Y rr�xml..�� K,rPi /1TN An. ryA m T .1 n L• i P iv K nwz�oF.: nnr zTri.' : Cm cr•T. C : 1 rT0(rA, ^�?.> •Ny C�OSSI npN 1' T ON_ mr m i(1n LwV i +ly ` . C1Ti rTr uN.r p TAU it y >r.r r •I <e��)�.rr. I w Al.T• =n � r .: i N I, T^ s�n ii +. 4 I i r /fe1j..r p I s Cd 7 1 III'" i T^ IAUrj ^A i'rba Dtl,,l1r� ,O„.f14r pm� 1j11jTr rin� TSB• S T ^ ..wVi rir Y ' �'!�.J+i u we•y"'+.}1. rNylr+ ..rr rrrrrrllL..uri »» ..u.,'..rr !� �I� W�WU!�NP YNVV r .wiVwru <M1 yPMW MVrO<I IO�.w.� Pmr irNr T.1 � �w F �'� I � o n,w. �,io r a •��Ownn'r��..��rP-"'vR��":L o�.,luo'•T NP r ra rNP.1j'�: ?+o ZZ -Nir ;: 'a ♦wY..,l� 'j w s OI^ N0�1C .T:J Jn/Oi <n Nn�r1 wC0 PO O� owL- w)YOn j o ^.�r own�ron - 17] . •tl I I I I I h �. �' ,k�� if:s,.�':+tw. :. ��. `L '= '^• ^I';�• '..� � r:�rr�lY �.a _ I , F-R! I jQY'r�A ^.dirllSC eCy9OD1T >) I >yTnl" T Y> A r T � AOrY Fnmi •w mOm•� nnnl. rnC ^T n >n�0 wt'CT :a , <NC n-•srr n m ^i;nr�a• n mtiF•nm i itzrr TI izd� a.. '•" . m�mmm � C I I P I O r• ' 1 I° I I I 1 � •orb€• O S^ > I I f"•I.m>� r Tm 'Y Yi ur _rv94•n)' •I I ; I T Yyy�.IT +`• nyTFP Tt iT iii^'. >n+o T =ppp°p as r•<.n�)�r ;�. I I S 2A1)[j r• `�2p°^•mO �9`wm •� dm IOCAr <d•F � m'tir sTWi zo r/s •°ew d � I I 4 „. s� �..r<�••e m^ �TTOrm I 1 I vLl m i Tn�Y TM=um `mlP ♦� pr •I '^ ^�• I nner ^ I `_ F ♦ 1 � I r � I dddd II m ��T � 2 m l m•s.•.2.�„x•i � I a, � r D T I ; f` r H ».�n 2 >W r >• I -- r`.I ♦ I P VN�f•.�^ ° }NP �I PS W±p•Ji•vpgvY•�J♦ ;D rir+. O V.n.°u nMf WNYf•,<m I r ' ; r I ., I I ♦ YSr PrT f ...•FF♦.JPrr)1 P +Nw MI. •+.•N • )� r^. f •�f fM�•R ♦�wy�i°w n•IRinn�uY r•dwS♦ Rnfr • F 1 +♦ mOUNVO N � C Yjq I d�{/.w1 OV OmPd +MNN N�1fAVSm do •r � I 1 I I I I I I • I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I • I I t� ��'t R' _ � -1 I I 0 -1 t r WIY�yN aIJ,MYV�jWY � yJNbyYNMrN Y �IVY4JP 1 r •• OJP OOr YYY •. NrI J.NNiYO Jb�O M.>yN MY.\P V V .N.1 �y u rP LwNNNh >.I��w} Lt >'wTOT11,yN TNy L! N T T O �w��w« r'+ T 00 T• I,w• T'^�wswN 1 ^� �Y >1�Sis)aM rr/!` .,10�z1 r_a SI- Tr2D1'H w N 1 N ZS>nf\O stilt SY nr. I)yyN r }s1w� _� _ �' �� =Dnn ONStin np TSIti AM C N O X1,1 - t «1MT2 N »C� TD N��S ONVO O f T K D fl« yy��Ny CC NSrI� N r�2°, =zOD� K T y S raw a^ z e1TS s T i i ^ titi iTTT O > J I I vwalocyao. °Dm"` oVn�r^al r_o yiG_CC wNir�mW1�CT r(y` TNtiww'i>iMT N^.f1N a9(�= fN O imN MN n]1a2 rN(1 qp ,-, y1M•�01n O o iY 00 M>1•1'fO ^a ZT� ^TM� -` NTLC�IC Da C Q ^ S. 9 ^ >,TVS VT"t-'RT NtiDOVn'Ory)Y= ;YON -i10 O T IX 19`ym N� SSNS� SS; nNNN N I,IO CJNN VI Sn 1 ]� -liM2 S J N ' r 1 1 ^ .`..`..r. r r rY ✓ �. r..r., .r.:.`. rir.. r.. r..r.::.r..r..r..�'..�..r....r. �.r+i rr..r. \r. � u u n° ' '� v 0 Mn VrwyUUq JJ4JJ JJJJpp r00000000ppd dddddd.0 ,>d P1wi00y bOV 0- J.IryyJU rT 3 Odb�IPVJ WNr.Odb1PN n:: wOwdl: w °J: Nr: ;0YPr01ri y 1 �• w ,1 • O • 1 b 2 I 1 1 } N " J rNd N H It 1 OYywyOrO Y NdI1dP lip y D T rSdddY00PVPOdr JOgQOOraRO UOOV4W.1 Y » � �! SpOOrdOOMPOO b00 VOOdO 00 vOOPOOPN P O O 1S r J000SrOOd OOP9SSN00 AOSOOOPS P O O ly I 1 I I ' I '' NY� }P�VMNOMV'w/O J''1N NNNNPYVNM ~N�NYMUONfPydy Ij N F ' I Tm�TT�I iwST1 OOnOn00f�nSn^^ ( '1n (�/�M nnnn Oq0 IM" O y T'( „Sana9T�N O`er >TyTHyC °OI�°rr� °y>C• C YNIIIMw (� D�/,� arrn}Opa II(�f �93i9NOw�lS �MUGif 1” P On, 9 >Tyn a193rN[0�2 S9a =0< Pri2nY9D� n}YL >TT 1 NTIw`QTOSMnA }T- >YY} T7y;: nlrfn3Y22N9 Pli2iiiYY"'Nlai ! Y T 9Yr9w oN o ° n i9r Na .rpp 'zip � }a S 9]JO S' 1 9 N fl I I TJITr�IpTJan>) I I �' I I I I T9 9 I "aM �'_II'•i .�2 n'nl'iir 0�2vr"Ip' I^ Dn a � r» 99fI:,0 Pr (a�i TSCy> (\H E02�NNLa N9rI� III y y m< y/M� O �N9 �Ip T9S YEN ST Dj°^ i ia° n na nnnn n n nnl"n" Nnnn i ppSa ii.ID. 3xza xAT. tTl. TSsT n�22 I o a aa rr A aA2a aID9 a 1 "N M NIiSi Ii1M vii � N� NVl ' I O n OVfwJrrrrrl'..,./..",.,,,, wl ar,.,�rwrrYa�7;:YNr..VY�urYYryr I: j NpNVVNM VIV VVNy� np pMNNUpNVV N. ff}f1JJ. .� � NVVNVVN I9 a "OdOVPPJVNr(ldOrP Nf Y4�V YNY NIVNNNrrrrrYrrr /9 O OdOHP Vf V4rO.pOyPgf VNr IY i 1 T AwNgVOVMNPPfVUfyYP rv�NON�"'p_O 40r Ip m OOMrOP4N/O[��VJ,n dTNrPdOUONyNNJ"iOd <V OrO�dnPOO.J.OpVN I2 4 OPSyPrSOCSS�/O OOSngjod4.0-0 S >u00 <SpOOSO S000A IY t 1 ;tf �' I 1 I I i I I I � � ( • 1 �J I H4r MWgNPP JbPI IJ NUVPNVwy J•NP ✓rdrJ..PUOJNJf.+r I 1 VFI.NVNyV �PPy�bNJNNMry'NMJOrddrJr6rrV dy }PJrle ~•`'ti' owu q};r aa yy''•• I WPPONNWOOgONW }.qPr Nq >� OMw�^f 9leP`T M1'S1py ___ ly [1 DT ^C >Y >SS SL wrrrrSr>y (�.�((mpp>ay IT P Di NOD^ TYr(ll'1_mTDT } >•f9y >rNr3 Sw'OT.>t 91a'iol�i Sr IiIT^�yII1 =_OTr Drmiy=ir> °N 1 D°^'2 N >Mp � °_N °rmTNmNTTI SI�T�; «TMTV >DSS�A 1 �•1L T !N D [n� �yTT ypNo yy�r 1 r N'^D N>9Ue22Tlrt �' �OOPrf1TY�TT••�yiw wZ rNy ••I'S1�2T 1 y °CNT 02 rmr D-1 >F8 CDT N.•IZ TY >j M..rrri ONSC •Ire. Zy �wy I � • Tm rD�9� NN•• S2 < C9l ><T.1 '^9 I T 92N9• ^' C9 wT y�M i.ir w(• rN rl. DM >riir �• Dr..li N O^(•Nr•yD12 ]*bmmr J YMm SSn 8' � rswr pa �y I i I N '1 H Zvi O 1 m>JD."Y � 1 g •fir ' � '` i I I eT.mlm<° Tm il>- .h�>MD 'JO.M Tee. it ••i z15'Figg.°..o I ' eV YYII L7 i"nq z yP €iz .1re � 1 z M1msN "e me�p•rc pNr� >a nigrNm pD Im D ��R� n rA NrpoiysnNC cin,.i Is �, ".N.Ip.zr z r rNrY:i l•i an olNi����l>- Niyml�or� 'rYel«Nr ii .'� rm � 1•IIN iN er i.y` rr\ � jl�,tTy w y !• N TC I> � `m �I9 `�]OTIrTIN � (1TT1NN Ne' N ZA tiwNi II •pl I �TAAti 1 pN � ° � i I a r -r ��.Niwrrr NNr.N.�rifrrr.r..rrrirr i rNNpNwYyNVrriNV VMgNNNUNNNMNUUNNNNgNNV NNUNNN �p NMO<OywgJUOPPVVyyVVV VryP PPPPPPPP ?NV VMVPMP ; O r I NrCNbyPNJyNrONPypgJ WNrOdbyP VJyly 1• i I I 1 i bf.fir}i4 V J�uN 1y.0 rr..HrO nPM1dT 1 N � r HN `^ T OIIdr" p }NP�M iyOOOPNdO(W�wnN yuN yN.O.N..Pl rry.DyVdW} I} yl ' 8P1PM[mjOPPOOJMV �pYdOP00 °OgOMOOq!•(°jO�.V.NOVr0r7 I~ r r I r I r e 1 � I y+u�pY �.yi u4iPpJuuiPr} yy }y� 4. V nPPp �PirO YYy IP.VrN �OINioO 1 N YiTOw� P. dCC�fVV..1 � I OYOr1J, •,.V Y 3 3 rt.F i� yN y/ 1n D �e ��T•YI1,�' <<wTY �ni C.Ii ONO0yO2TINt ^•'/N, I/T^ O IX S•C! l ) P I/GSDY= yf >TF OM /Yf r�w OlYSsS2fYi °�S �.rIg�N 1 • b I1yQi� •SnOcr_m(2tY•V >ya 9nL�OI•I LD'A��r2m <TIr••,r•2D _� y2 >ar!•�2 OJtCM-N n^i�ON T�yI• ^rw �y2 T��i yr•" O Or On•Y •�.j yn�T �fy 1 wt °ONmi^ IlK ^� r w 'b ✓ ^rTOrTYY PSyy� � bwy n C/t 00'N On M= I O� m �R 491/e-- SODS 1 A IN yi ' N 2 iTT pE 'D 7•M� � IS 00 Y 2 ° N ^ N 1^ •wnw;T• n mwyy�yc�T �O rD >�,•/ON yF •.P pYS.1 y(! / _. I i I ^a.rldY WT >•m » i Ty Ci• pa�,y0 oor.i / m2 ;M i. >Sr -Swi fx. Ayai••a.•• zen Smp =y 0n4 i 1 j I . 1J'J!1NF iNy//��fC .. 1•~I •~ ~^Y•=i pmT SC T1$$$yyT A. � i I I I�y� •T N� S�NT i1�r�r��YN�i� 1 D �t „1jD lm i i ^M 2 O n n P � 1 T n° Nzr•.,r 1 ! I ° SY 1° ,° CCoco fi nn ^� Im ST� S�•IYN = �•' D D DfD fix •t m p � •q•IJ1 rte.. "• "�Jr.. pyl r..0 NJN NNU3.I •=.yM � 2 Y41N.YNN p•.rpp.M •.uurrJ?r uI•. r•�y ✓'ry MJlrrr / �C �~ rpi •P. r pp r l z P Nprq i r ib..P Ni VNN CJ 001 ^wOOO PP ObN •'•'r �• Iy Yi.Y1.IrO NO VpijNJN ly VI y you Yr!� ( • N y 4` I IQ Coe Ya�•�rP yrtl°•�ptl•V•]a V.1 gar ' MN! ' D D :Y i y° �bOO�iONri�VVOU�OM (YVrMU.appoNpy °NNVt°upopa jD j' NOrI OOYObP IbiN.aIpOP0000000 ;~ + 1 , ass . v},t : cV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 11, 1906 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jim girt, Administrative 6errices Director /Depury City SUBJECT: Receive and File — City of Rancho Cucamonga lavestneat schedule Status 4pert sa of November 30, 1916. i I TIC Veatvooc savings g Loin American Csvings boreh Ameriesa saving[ bell 8avin8s 6 Loan United Misrabi Bank First Interstate bank MIS • ,alo Nat-1 Dank INVE8TM18fA?�,�COCAMONCA UULE BTA s REPORT PURCHASE MATUR_'1T INTMMT —'DAB ATE i$ RATS, 05 -28-85 12 -01 -06 1001000 0.07900 11 -04-85 12 -04-66 100,000 0.09000 06 -09-06 12 -05-86 100,000 0.07600 06 -06 -86 12 -05-86 101.000 0.08000 03 -19-86 12 -05-86 100,000 0.07500 06 -13 -86 12 -10-86 500,000 0.06200 05 -19-86 12 -12 -86 100,000 0.07500 e Investment Status Report Pate 2 IMpE$TMT PURCHASE MAIURI-r DATE: IMSERESS PAIR MARZES DATE AMOUST —RATI mug Escondido Savings 6 Loan 06 -16 -e6 12 -14-56 100,000 0.08000 Bank of America 07 -01 -86 12 -15-86 3`''0.682 0.06530 California Federal 03 -19-86 12 -15-86 400 .00C 0.07450 Ramnoa Savings 6 Loan 03 -16-86 12 -15-86 100.000 0.08625 Sank of America 10 -17 -30 12 -16 -86 400,000 0.05350 Fresno bank of Commerce 06 -1946 12 -16 -86 100,000 0.07625 Mitsui Manufacturers 06 -20-06 12 -17 -46 100,000 1.06600 Foothill 1rdependont ]lank 09 -18-86 12 -18-86 765,049 Pmsnry + I *1 National bank of La Jolla 09 -19-86 12 -18-86 100,000 0 '50 Foothill Independent bank 11 -21 -86 12 -22 -86 349,157 0.0; 1 United Bank 06 -23 -86 12 -22 -86 100,000 0.0656 Community Bank 07 -01 -48 12 -29-86 500,000 0.06850 Vineyard Natiooal lank 07 -02 -46 12 -29-46 100,000 0.07100 Arrowhead Pacific Savings 03 -11 -46 12 -31 -46 100,000 0.0x250 Bank of America 03 -19-86 01 -02 -87 300,000 0.06875 Security Pacific Serious, 10 -16 -86 01 -12 -87 590,000 0.05230 Rank of America 07 -15-46 01 -12 -47 100.000 , 0.06175 lank of Southern California 07 -17 -86 01 -13 -87 100,000 0.07000 Security Federal Savings 02 -28-86 01 -26 -87 100,000 0.04500 - Merit Savings Bank 03 -03 -86 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.04500 ' Royal Oak Savings A Loan 03 -03 -46 61 -27 -87 100,000 0.08375 Upland National Bank 01 -27 -86 01 -27 -07 100,000 0,04500 Equitec 01 -27 -C6 01 -27 -87 100.000 0.08800 x Investment Page 3 States AeporC I PURCBASE 1LITUAITT —AATZ— DATE AMOVIT INTEREBr PAIR xanr HATS Capital Bank Coavtry Savings Bank 01 -29-56 01 -29-g7 100,000 o.oyYSo So. Calif. Savings i Loan 01 -31 -66 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09500 Bel -Air Savings A Loan 01 -31 -86 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09150 Westport Savings 02 -04-56 02 -04-87 100,000 0.0925° Beak Puily Savings 6 Loan 02 -05-56 02 -05-87 100,000 0.06750 California Pedezal 02 -06 -66 02 -06 -87 10°,000 0.03730 ILsvtko Bank 07 -16 -85 OY -09-87 100.000 0.06400 Coldev Paeiffe Savings 02 -13 -86 02-13-87 100,000 °.09000 Cold Siver Savings 6 Luav 02-14 -OSlC 77 7 100,000 0.06750 02 -14-66 02 -16 -87 -8 Senare S 100,000 0.08750 Strings 6 Lao Gibraltar 02 -19-B5 02 -19.87 100,000 0.09000 s 6 Loan 02 -14-85 02 -20-67 100,000 Bel do Savings ngs d Loao 0.10250 Coast Savings ♦ings A Loen 8-26 -86 02 -23 -87 100,000 0.07250 South Bay S,, iaga 08 -21 -85 02 -23-07 100,000 0.07000 d Loao N[. Mai they Savings 02 -25-86 02 -25.37 100,000 0.08750 6 Loan 02 -25-66 02 -25-67 Cuaraaty Savings A Loan 100.000 0.06750 02 -25-66 Century City Faviags A Loan 02 -25-57 100,000 0.08700 Mercantile Bank 02 -2( � 02 -26 -87 100.000 0.08750 First Savings A Lose 02 -26-86 03 -02 -87 100,000 0.06500 Southwest Bank 03-03 -86 03-07 -6/ 300,000 0.09000 University Savings 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 300,000 0.07850 Guardian Savings 03-03 -66 03 -04-67 100,000 0.08750 A Loan 09 -05-86 03 -04.67 Brentwood davinga 6 Loan 100,000 0.0645° 03 -04-86 03 -04-87 100 000 Y \ . 0.08750 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 '•�,'� Investment Statue Report Page 4 PURCHASE MLTUEITT INTBBEST MR VAMT l"IMINT Mn DA76 ANOO:Ii _kAT 3 _p LUE Commercial Pacific Savings 03 -04-86 03 -04-87 100,000 0.08625 Onion Foieral Savings 03 -04-56 03 -04-877 100,000 0.08500 La Jolla Tillage Bank 02 -04-06 03 -04-87 1001000 0.08500 • Manhattan Sank Savings 03-4rP6 03 -05-87 100,000 0.08750 Guardian Federal Savings U3 -05-86 03 -05-87 100,000 0.08500 Western Family Sank 03 46 -06 03 -06 -87 100,0'V 0.08375 Weetco Savings Bank 03 -11 -86 03 -11 -87 100,000 0.08750 100,000 A1,.arado Bank 03 -12 -86 03 -12 -57 100,000 0.08250 Valley National Bank 03 -12 -86 03 -12 -67 100,000 0.08100 Bank of America 03 -13 -86 03 -13 -87 100,000 0.07135 Son Savings i Loan 03 -18-66 03 -18-87 100,000 0.08750 San Mequito National Bank 03 -19-86 03 -10-87 100,000 0.08250 California Security Bank 03 -21 -86 03 -23 -87 100,000 0.08250 100,000 Wilshire Center Sank 03 -24-66 03 -24-87 100,000 0.08125 100,000 ' Huntington National Bank 03 -25-86 03 -25-87 100,000 0.08250 Atlantic Financial Savings 03 -25-86 03 -25-87 100,000 0.08375 Merchant's Bank 03 -25-86 03 -25-87 100,0c0 0.08250 !- Consolidated Savings 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100,000 0.08250 Lincoln American Savings 03 -26 -86 03 -76 -87 100,000 0.08150 " City Thrift i Loam 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100,000 0.06250 - Saratoga Savings A Loan 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100,000 0.06250 - United American Bank 03 -26 -86 03 -26 -87 100,000 0.08000 100,000 i ;t Golden Pacific Bank 04 -03 -66 04 -03 -87 :00,000 0.08000 '= Sank of America 10 -17 -46 04-1•r87 500,000 0.05500 > Investment Status Report Page S IH9tr819fF51i PORCRASB KAMRITy °ems- --UTS won Bevport- Balboa 8 6 L 10 -20-86 Palm Spring@ 81vivgr Bank 10 -20-86 Chino Valley Bank 10 -20 -86 Butterfield 8 6 L 04 -22 -96 brine City 8 S L 10 -24-BS Deauville Saviugs Bank 04. -22 -t6 Mntal 8 6 L Assoc. 04 -24-86 Mercury Savings 6 Loan 04 -24.66 Malaga Bering@ 6 Loan 04 -24-86 Adobe Savings 6 Loan 04. -24.86 Iorestor'• Thrift 6 Loan 04.24-66 Capitol Bank of Calif. 04 -78-86 Golden Coin Saving, 6 1", 04.19 -86 Wilabire savings 6 Loan 05 -Ox66 Manila Bast of Calf!. 05 -12 -86 Western Federal 8 6 L 05 -14-86 Sao' of Ban Francisco 05-3 9-85 Bank. of America 11 -19-86 Le Cumbre Savings Bs,:t 16 -20 -86 Paramount Savings 6 Lam 05 -16 -86 Antelope Valley g 6 L 05 -16 -86 Stockton Sav jugs 6 Lan 05 -16 -86 Enei,o Savings 6 Soan 05 -20-86 Soutbveat 8evings 6 Loa, 05 -20-86 IRIRRRf7 Fels IwRIK _un_ vALDE 04 -20-87 100,000 0.06350 04 -20-87 100,000 0.06000 04 -20-8! 109,000 0.05500 04 -22-87 99,000 0.08000 04 -22-67 100,000 0.08375 04 -22 -87 100.000 0.07675 04-23-87 100,000 0.01000 04 -24.87 100,000 0.07250 04 -24-87 100,000 0.07375 Oa -24-87 100,009 0.07900 04-24-87 100,000 0.08100 04-28 -87 100,000 0.07250 04-29 -87 100,000 0.07500 05 -11 -8) 100,000 0.07750 05 -12 -67 100,000 0.07500 05 -14-87 100,030 0.07875 O: -14-87 100,000 0.07350 05 -18-87 1,000,000 0.03750 05 -18-87 100,000 0.06000 05-18-87 93,000 O.Od000 05 -18-87 100,000 0.07750 05 -18-87 100,000 0.07500 05--10 -67 100,000 0.07750 05 -20 -87 100,000 0.07800 / r�L Investment Status Report page 6 INVESTMEN Tracy Savingn 6 Lot* Columbia Savings 6 Loan Republic Federal Savings Ccuuni ty Thrift 6 Loan Tahoe Savings 6 Loa* Eighlaud Savings 6 Loan Brookside Savings 6 Loan West Coast Savings 6 Loan Equitable Savings 6 Loan Sierra Thrift 6 Loan Southwest Savings 6 Loan City 8avlugs 6 Loan Life Savings 6 Loan dterling Bank Imperial Thrift 6 Loan Ventura City 11at -1 Sank Sterling Savings 6 Loan Some Tbrift 6 Loan Golden Security Santa Barbara 8 6 L Fidelity SsvioSs Sank of San k=on National Sank of Calif Charter Savings 6 Loan FO1CR63R NATURITT _2LU -- -PAM- AMOUNT 05 -21 -86 05.22 -86 05 -22 -86 05 -23 -86 05 -23 -86 05 -23 -86 05 -25-86 05 -28-86 06 -02 -86 06 -02 -86 06 -20-86 06 -03 -86 06 -04-86 06 -04-56 06 -05-86 06 -06 -86 06 -06 -85 06 -09-86 06 -16 -86 06 -17 -86 06 -17 -86 06 -19-86 06 -20 -86 06 -2 &86 05 -21 -87 05 -22 -87 05 -22 -57 05 -23 -87 05 -23 -87 05 -26 -87 05 -28-87 05 -28-87 06 -02 -87 06 -02 -87 06 -02 -87 06 -03 -87 06 -04-87 OS -04-67 06 -05-87 06 -08-87 O6 -0&87 06 -09-87 G6 -16 -87 U6 -17 -87 06 -1 &87 06 -1 x- 06-22 M1 06 -22 -87 1,3 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 98,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 10 ^,000 190,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 INTEREST FAIR MARKET RATE CALOE 0.07500 0.07450 0.07500 0.07600 0.07800 0.07750 0.07900 0.07500 0.08000 0.08050 0.07750 0.07500 0.07750 0.07500 0.07600 0.07750 0.07500 0.07750 0.07500 0.08050 0.07850 0.07500 0.07700 0.07850 r� , Investment Statue Report Page 7 JT.: w PURCHASE MATURITY INTEREST PAIR MARKET _DAYS rT§_ AMOUNT RATS VALUE American Commarce Nat'l 06 -23 -86 06 -23 -67 100,000 0.07625 Executive Savings 6 Loan 06 -23 -86 06 -23 -87 100,000 0.07875 Imperial Savings 06 -30-86 06 -30-8+ 100,000 0.07500 m,erican latermte Savings 07 -02 -86 07 -02 -87 100,000 0.08000 First Deposit Savings Bank 07 -03 -86 07 -03 -87 100.000 0.07800 Rarthorce Savings 6 Lava 07 -07 -86 07 -07 -87 100,000 O.Off Investment Savings 6 Loan 07 -07 -86 07 -07 -87 100,000 0.0787: U.S. Community Savfage Bank 07 -07 -86 07 -07 -87 100,000 0.07500 Westlake rarift '. Loan 07 -07 -86 07 -07 -87 100,000 0.08500 Wsabingcon Saeiags A Lava 06 -16 -86 07 -16 -87 IOO,COO 0.08250 Statewide Thrift 4 Loan 05 -10 -86 07 -16 -87 100,000 0.07150 Commercial Confer Bank 07 -18-86 07 -20-67 100,000 0.06400 Amado:• Va,ley savings 4 Loao 07 -18-86 07 -21 -87 100.000 0.072500 Yirst Commercial Wscit 07 -21 -86 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07250 first Sierra Bank 07 -21 -86 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07600 Perpet,isl Savings A Loaf, 07 -21 -86 07 -21 -87 100,COQ 0.07500 Sierra Federal Csvins: 07-18 -86 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07500 Piooser Savings A Loan 07 -18-86 07 -21 -87 99,000 0.07500 Viking 3avings 6 Loan 07 -21 -86 07 -21 -87 100.000 0.07625 Home Savings of Anerira 07- 21 -86 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07700 Say View Federal 8 6 L 07 -22 -86 07 -22 -87 100,000 0.07500 Great Western 8 6 L 07 -18-86 07 -24-87 400,000 0.65000 Cabrillo Savings Back 07 -29-86 07 -29-87 100,000 0.07230 Lake Savings 6 Loan 07 -29-96 07 -29-87 100,000 0.07550 t Lr: PateQtaeat BGtu• beport [.lj, PUa MA2Ubl2Y a- 'P i Cnyaaaca Dank PAvlrn -c.lif 07 -30-56 0? -30-87 100 18>'6RL4S FUR XAt"i orals 0 L L 07 -30-86 .000 D.r7250 Pacific b e6eary Bank 07 -30-67 100,000 0.08 ",0 Global beak Savia t • 07 -3I -D6 07 -91 -67 100,000 0.0"4-86 Inlard Saving' 4 L an OD-04 - 08 -04.87 100,000 0.07600 Plana S•viaga 4 Loan 03-04-86 08-04.87 100,C00 0.07633 Glendale Federal p y.11 -� 08 -11 -57 100,000 0.07600 00"6y 006y Saving• 4 Loan 08 -25-86 08 -25-87 100,000 0.06450 First Security 4,viaga 08 -26 -86 W26 -87 100,000 0,06625 Bank Libert y g nt.'tge 6 Loan 00",_86 09-08-87 98,000 3,07375 Peanlnaala BnvinEs 02 -19 -DS 09 -14-87 10"'000 0.09230 Torrance 8.1,,, 09 -20-86 09 -16 -87 1r,0,000 0.09000 F ouaebold Baas 09-20 -D6 C } 100, 1C2.000 16 -E7 000 lea! Back 0 .08500 09-19 -86 09.21 -87 100,000 100.000 Bank of Aaerics 0 }19.86 0.07000 09 -21 -87 100,000 Dank of Assert" 09-22- 0.06100 86 09 22 -DI 100,000 Palley Federal e 4 L 09-23- 0.03973 86 09'2"'-67 1001000 0.03923 Western Finsecial Saving• 0?--23 -86 09 -� -B) 500,000 0.06700 Bank of Beverly bill• 1 0-06 -� 10-06 -87 100,000 0.06750 Bank of Wbi [tier I0 -14-86 10 -14.87 100,000 vista Savings D,ok 0.06400 tau -B/. IC -16 -87 100,000 Western P+pire B 6 L 0.06500 1,0'17 - 10 1119-87 100,000 Long Desch savings 6 "In 0,06750 'P 86 10 -20-87 99,000 0.07000 Capital Pedcral B 6 L 10 -20-86 10 -20-87 100,000 0.06750 _ 11 -09-87 100 p . 00 0,06750 Pves9 ent Bta NS Report _86 11 -17 -8 Cal America 8evlogs 01 -28-86 8 PR PUICH18E 01 -31 -86 02 -01 -88 American Vest Bank 08 -08-86 -Jan_ A7E o �3 I8 re lmlar ll HPRg¢r NJ'- San Clement, 8avtoga : Loan 31 -07 -86 Bank 03 -05-86 Pan American 03 -07 -d8 .. �QJ Baok of )F"Port 11-14-06 u -14-86 11 -0¢87 100,000 0.06875 Bank of America 11 -17 -86 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.06350 Pomona Firs 6 L C Fed 8 Hamilton savings 1I -17 -d) 500-000 0.05850 Commerce Savings 11 -19-48 I1 -19-87 100,000 03 -28.88 First Fed. 1I -26 -86 11 -27 -87 'I Cozmerce Back 5.0 -12.0 Variable Pate Savin or Calitozoia Ss lank 99,000 0.06�Op 11 -26 &stern Ssvlagr 6 Loan _86 11 -17 -8 Cal America 8evlogs 01 -28-86 01 -28-8 Camino Peal savings 01 -31 -86 02 -01 -88 American Vest Bank 08 -08-86 02 -04-88 Ioteratlonal 8avtn.3 Bank 03 -03-8d 03 -05-81 03 -05-86 Bidden Valley Varioal 03 -07_84 Bank 03 -05-86 Pan American 03 -07 -d8 Sn1n8s Bank Lincoln 8av inga 03 -05-86 03 -07 -88 6 Loao 03-06 -86 Loo do gales Federal 03 -07 -88 8avinga 03 -11 -86 Hamilton savings 03 -10-88 Bank 03 -26 -86 Universal 8avtnga Baok 03 -28.88 Beam V Witter Reynolds 03 -27 -86 03 -28-88 'I Cozmerce Back 04 -38-85 0&15 -08 San Lnls Obispo Sam J Jose Ratio. 06 -19.86 06 -20-86 Bank 07 -08-86 Valle Be Oro Bank 0I -07 -88 • rr!- Valley 8atioal Bank 07 -16 -86 07- 15-•88 ' Bella Savings 07 -18-86 07 -18-88 6 Loao 06 -08-86 HS-08-68 / 100,000 0.06500 d 100,000 0.09,50 100,000 0.09600 100.000 0.08000 100,000 0.08730 100,000 0.08750 100,000 O.00)SO 100,000 0.08750 100,000 0.08800 106,000 0.09000 100,000 0.08500 100,000 0.08500 97,181 Tr 100,000 100,00 100,000 100,000 100,000 easury Boods2 00 100,000 100,000 A00,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 113,531 ' 8000 100,000 0.08000 100,000 - 0 7.,d 100,000 0.07500 100,000 0,07500 100,000 III III +'- Investment Status Report Page 10 i' PORCH67H MATURITY DTI_ WE AMOUNT INTEREST FAIR MAR3:H: SAT1! _ y1L019 Sunrise Bank 03 -14-86 09 -14-18 L00,900 1.08750 100,000 Gateway Saviuga 6 Lcan 03 -25-86 09 -25-8t 100,000 0.08375 100,000 First Global Savings Bank 11 -14-86 11 -14-88 100,000 0 06500 100,000 Great Pacific Savings 02 -03 -86 02 -03 -89 100,000 0.09750 100,000 Desert Coammanity Bank 02 -13 -d6 02 -13 -89 100,000 0.09875 100,000 National Beck of Catalina 02 -21 -86 02 -27 -89 100,000 0.09500 100,000 North Coast Savings 03 -03 -86 0: -03 -89 100,000 0.09230 100,000 Continental Savings 03 -05-86 03 -07 -89 100,000 0.09250 10:,000 Independence Pavinga 03 -05-86 03 -07 -69 100,000 0.09150 100,000 Heritage Oak@ Bank 03 -11 -86 03 -10-69 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Mestaide Savings 6 Loan 03 -11 -86 03 -10-89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Hcuestate Savings 6 Loan 03 -11 -06 03 -10-89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Suisun Valley Bank 03 -12 -86 03 -13 -99 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Coast Bank 03 -13 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 J9050 1C0,000 Regency Bank 03 -14-86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.06750 100,000 Pacific Business Bank 03 -14-86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Sacramento first National 03 -14-96 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09250 100,000 Novato National Bank 03 -19-86 03 -15-89 100,000 0.09500 100,000 Bank of Del Mar 03 -17 -e6 03 -16 -89 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Bay Area Bank 03 -17 -86 03 -16 -89 100,900 0.09000 A00.000 First American Bank 03 -18-86 03 -17 -89 100,000 0.00750 100,000 City Commerce Bank 03 -21 -86 03 -20-89 100,000 0.08750 100,000 Bank of Coamerce 03 -25-86 03 -25-89 100,600 0.09000 100,000 Constitution Savings 03 -25-56 03 -28-89 99,000 0.09250 100,000:'-, a ,k Inven dent Status Revolt Page 11 > i + INVISTMEEi PURCHASE MATURITY INTEREST TAIL MARKET _�— AMOUNT 7112 VALUE Pacific coast 8av1.g, 0"8-86 03 -30-89 100.000 ' 0.07000 Valley commercial Dank 03 -12 -86 09.08 -89 100,000 100,000 8tockdale 8avtnga i Loan 03 -19-89 09 -15-89 0,09250 100,000 100,000 0.09250 100,000 Minion Valle Dank 7 03 -26 -86 09622 -89 100,000 ^' Eou,atead Saving, d Loa. 10-09 -86 10 -09-89 0,09000 100,000 100,000 0.07100 100,000 Coverment Nat11 Mortgage 05 -22 -86 3 -15 -2001 94,654 0.08500 99,959 Goverment Nat'l Mortgage 07 -22 -86 5-15 -2001 739,687 SBA CID Loan Pool CSFS 07 -25-86 7 -25 -2011 1,101,563 0.08500 766, %3 Local Age.cT I.eaet Pied 10 -19-86 variable 1,980,115 As Reeled 2,250,000 0.07510 Local A98RCT Invent Food 10 -19-96 As Seeded 2,750,000 0.07510 Bank of America 01 -11 -86 Passbook 602,040 0.0l000 Sub Total 36,706,022 r 0 a Investment Status Report page 12 INTESTWENT PD Great Western Savings F-M Weatern Financial Western Popire Crest Western Savings Century S,.viegs 6 Loan As of 11 -30-86 PORCRABE MATURITY INTEREST PAIR NAREET _DATIS_ AIM MOUNT _RASE VATAE 11 -05-86 12 -05-56 3,663,127 0.03900 Sub Total: 3,663,127 1045 -86 10 -06 -87 100,000 0.06750 30 -20-86 10 -20-87 99,000 0.07000 10 -03 -86 12 -02 -86 4,10C,000 0.05800 02 -26 -06 02 -26 -87 jj10,000 0.08750 Sub Totslt 4,399,000 Grand Total$ 44,768,149 e1 Treasury Bills are purchased at a price below their uaturit3 value. They are quoted and traded ra i5e basis of yield to maturity. The approxiaste interest earned on thle six month investment will be 625,468.00. e2 The approximate ir.terent earned on this investment mill be 6;4,000.00. e3 Securities which are backed by pools of government insured or guaranteed mortgages Note 4: All investatuts are Certificates of Deposit unless otberviie noted sbm v. �l C • 'nYi Y i CMY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c um, STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1986 la TO: City Council and City Manager isn FROM: Rathinora (Shintu) Bose, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tract 12952 and release of Improvement I Agreements uon Octobe is, Improvement 986, SforrTract 12952plocated east of Haven Avenue, west of Daer Creek Channel and south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Gienfed Development Corporation RECOWIXOATIOR It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attatled resolution accepting said agreements and securities and releasing the Agreements and Securities accepted by City Council on October 15, 1986 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said Agreements and release said seu ;rities. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Glenfed Development Corporation submitted Savings Pass Books as surety at the October 15, 1986 meeting. At this tine they are submitting bonds to replace the pass books in the following amounts: Line 4P Stone Drain Cff -Sites Faithful-Performance $209,000 $959,000 Labor and Material $104,500 $475,000 *CLpies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, RS Attachments �r WE Into ",0W ALL PEN BY MCT 12962 Stott' of Caltfo sfae wijhE heSProvtsiThat a e�aent this gre hereinafter Celifornfa, a °f the applicable f the Subdivision made and hereinafter referred ae+nfclpa) ca Old s of Nap Act entered referred to as the rp°ratfon, pees of the City of the ed to as the De elope, and Y and between Y of Rancho Per. 4lenfed Devalopment said Cit Corporation THAT, WHEREAS WITNESSM: said City as , said Developer desires to said and shown °n the conditionally certain real develo NHER y aPProvod subdivision Property I. Developer' Pere City has established kno,m as Tract east of Haven, west 9OfsDeerto aPProval certain equ Creek Channel, yaid quids 3 to be mot SY said NOW South 0., lil lsfon general follows ;' THEREFORE, It Is hereby , H19hiand, y located Y agree0 by said C1tY and by said DeveloPer e�1• The Developer hereby agrees to ectIv eda described as date hereoY, 01' Page 6 hereof within atwe Yelo i ex all 2• Aar ° Dense the CouncllhIS agreepe t shall be months from the default thesa,a Vfollowln ving thiscagr Ve on 1vehe This a of 'he resolution of dat provided, ext °n't0e of time has the beenrst Y date aAproval granted sax ocment shall be In The Developer �Y said City asaheteinafter hereoY, Such per request s all request sUb an extension �� eYS before the explratfone suGafhereof Y 1t' M•itln staunlztay� °necessitating date the C1ttf�onLe�o°Piete the terms ndards, the Pravislons of ' anf shall 9 not less than therein if Cost estimate this a of me, a slat Of any substantfaland IMProv 9reement, lncludln Y shall ntthe e Cit than e'nent securlt 9 the construction this 4. di the DeveloPer a 9e has occurred durin9ntne° require adjustments provisions °t' the It ails or neglects to tens hereof. Developer and /or hlsesur t shall ll have he rlghtc to 01 time the Provisions of S. Y the full cost and an nthereupon recover cause dove to The Developer said Pga C in accordance 11 Provide incurred, va the Cucamonga Count with the metered water servfco to Y Water District, regulations, schedules each lot 166x1 v . and fees Of said Encino, e A 91 -0ulevard of the CA 36 ons6 The Developer shall be responsible truccion of component of and the owner Of required improve1Y Irrigation or reps�si�nt re)ocation, or the satisf satisfaction in conflict such water system, em the Clt with Drawings and Standard re y Engineer Drawings and Standard ecired to be constructed shall approved tabu by and on f11e eciflcatfons Of conform to the are tabulated .n the Construa Offi a the City, and to the I Standard Page 6 hereof °f the CItY Engineer, Improvement Plan th Developer shalltalso from the i ementEstimate, Said fmprov"nts other in°fdental be responsible for t pea construction er any Incorporated on Proper surface work beyond the tract thereon by number . Shall be corrected unage, Errors boundaries as needed ft�ansitions or to said plan abdiffcatia dlrectlon�lsslons discoverer during constrcetln and agreement and secured b shall °f the Y Engineer. of Y the surety Covering rthe o t 1t a Provisions d workt is office' Construction permits shall g Planned thereon shall e Y Engineer prior, to be obtained works, Of dust be obs°rved, with atten0 start Of by the Developer from the Public loft°, or Other given to sa'fe�ii reguiattons listed shall be subje " end C1t nuisance to the y procedures lect to the y Departments Failure to eO Proper notification on rol Penalties provided therefor, o ply with result debris frw °Per shall be rasponsible for removal section resulting frQ4 work prell� {yritatsald r^OVai °f 411 loose rocks and development. ad�oinfng said development 10. Work done within existin event of the City shall nave the existing event of un�ustffied delay In coapletlon to complete any. and 1l work 1n to Incurred from dill ./ pursued _ the Deveioper and /or his contractor recover 11. 411 cost and the streets and Said Developer shall y any lawful means, expense acceptance Of easements in said s all tiaxts foilowin adequate warning Said to Work or Improvement ipyssae C1t to therdfeo�letf °f the existent in said to the traveling p,iblic Of from such defect Iva or eat each a Council,cgive and or da.geroux cold. and ,will and every dangerous condition Until the c Protect the traveling public any the achf°p n Of all sailer Beets Improvements accrPt°d at fnpron 3 9e 7 , to the ge of said Y str,ret Incorporated on Pa Pu lit. issugd�0yttae t e COnditfons coma grad1°aY close all ur aall Portion under Dublfc r�urin9 the constructfongineer. whenever iinis rem ma'y strelosure 12. Parkway 01 the Improvements herein agrreGto Protect th OM to d therrt required to be 4 and by the Che Planting after iUprov the Planting shall smelt work. Planted shall be Planted Plantsn9 dta r approved y t as Provied baler 9 a° approved by the :SC Provided Co. Y Ordinance inraccordanee with n'°°nity Development Director, , 'XI The Gevelopr. health unit) theall be res after Planting, nd of the ^sable 9 wblchever is 9uaranteed15slntalnln2 all trees by the) City pursuant er 15 responsible maintenance period, ore on In Year co streneuctedoNethe developmeme Subdlvlsfonrrym2etln guod rounder and for A Act all conditlons established e City. and er f anti before such a�rov 1 the ) the ma,,,,- enaiit Ofdlan CAUnc1I of acceptance unless aecurityopwld 15 °ccepted all �uPro�d this la, this City, otharwlse p;oy� �Da�efnwlth shaij inten,ince b agreement hereinafse nt shall not d authortred by be thelCity to the Cit C09ether withscriberd has beeo°� ^ata th a� Council the released until security Y °successor to as /eVrovement Y the Cit tenance guarantee itY therefor s been acce the herein named security hasbeen until has been released, aad this a Ind � resolution fsub0rttted 15, the shailiaProv°zane security and the the city e CityAttall consist Of the to be fu• faprove:aen Y: fo11ow1n ^fsh;e by A. 9 and shall be the Oeveloper vl:h 1. secure faithful Perfo this A bond a to a form ecceptablO D sureties n bonds by of this y z. Section 6C n the form ennd or r . agreem)ent, An I Spec aVrOveox-at B, 3. app O sslt y thCityrAtyornsyrrrctentP inl thauby Government Coda To secure led for s;ecurinitY of fora' and convent A bond avers y;d t dePOsit of nayotf�er6 0 kind suretfes n bonds mater /a)m_n. Public bonds o/ the 2 Section the form one or abra specified lair vb at^ ydiciitent leautnOrIzed Government 3. deposit by the Securl: A deposit with CittY Attorney, at fn the Coda C- hcashpdepo i fwr ecuring Y or ne content e lnee, or the Cfty t monr 9otfable fore �d conte for the survay0' whose 9uarante+ bands of the kind amount "of and for furnlsbOundary,r lot ictor appear sb� the OeveloPer t surveyor a the deposit m1e 9 center corner, upon Fin o tI.. cash line tie a"d street rental .Map contalnedbond shjj be asa yryo � in fuull or, tified 6y the Cityerlrne hereIn. on the it no valu a "9lneer or receipt Y the cat mV be refunded Construction and Bond Estim o• °yment in fully from the G7 -7t eer or s�ry� Procedure fttenas urance er u D. 'h' required yy 9e 6 of thip0"ds and the alI me•ti shall be Peragreement w cement. Principal amounts thereof ar a r want The 0eveio al lrI tfy da<ahePl,, r°q efectth t the fnprov a set forte on mat PerCenteilpXa)1 furnlsy y1c�e�opeProvnd t0 berdefe annddnworkmaS ribed fn nts t ecure tb° 0 the co structtnaor free ailacceptedp thin hone MY char Ara a aft fu sPelclP� aPer ormanCS e/ Olga aPtDevte °�Sslppu�tY In a stah'eCCftylf yea onc to Y shat) sebo^ fir a ants respect t OPe�uof anela pSecuritll9at1ons Baer is 9red teen this eu horfiedC°k°ttemaYby theeCite, accepted way mafntetl n ofathaalsodSecureed in th by the Subdivision Hap Aet°.older t�toovvementa Ce quarreaedlstr /e�0 Such 17, and ^tract Y That damd Devel "soper take and any epplica6 a release ylsesatheed lin subco Igo shall operation damages swDfml "9 wok as shalluPrand Malntafn )Ordfnarce. rwfse this Y any sold persactoreor suD agreem 4! bete sebY this agreement i" and co C 114bllit Developerons one" thountractnt °'hathsr such the Pcmontractor or ndy as The 9h such d a" a dlr Eons yf the eraens, Y Yen operat °)alas for Cit sub P;DloYees "aibinsu edbillty a dsubcontractnr caused byledfrectly lmsel� or ti min {actor t as well and direct, rOPerty d Or anyone a "a911gence'If by The aun amountsdofisucI taancehPa Oeve oper, h Sity,uitsce hall list the A. Contractor, ante shallabissued here �oniractorserst a,enta )1000 ty limitab111ty lnsuranc a as (allows: der shall sor�stahis 11 1,000 000 s of o Provf arise °R occurrence With its of ^accidents or than $5pp moodily Injury les 8. work a 6n Provided Lions Ofe the De off $5p00� •for" ea 6npe Person limits a)FCe 1labiifty / paveloPer It. for Cl accident Se nlimits of this nsurance covert t i" the Perfair s which may ot, Iaaccide"ntto� ass than9$50eme0 ant Prav1C 9 411 vahf e t ss occu t In ties °P he t9onagat thn $250, 00ence, 000 for ea 9 bodily used the Pray tile of Porlf he in l p or h c � acto'rc ar151 ab C l 0 f oY njury Y lim1 an " Performingtthe°r�a - _iOt •5i file 18. That before the exr_ution OF this SPecffied 'insurance a certificate or certificates precludfn Each agreement. the Developer shall 9 the cancellations such certificate of, insurance coverfn by sucha ertreceivedbafo; a therexpfbatlon of thlr Y9 o bany PolicYnevtdaenC�; shall carrier. not,ficetion Y registered �i1 days after the rlty As evidence of vnd•ratandln p Q9 the insurance fMroveraenths sue• the Subdvider vistons contained herein to ecuritYA and "as affixed his s1 ^etured therein. described g hereto: •Milt "A Type: FAI ifaze and address of Prin: For CITY OF RFX ii File Re a eSe er OTract i �1P9S�-.NTE" of i of per. �� CItY OrewIng 0. 14 +wit w+tae iAHi1 Does r lude 7� 7Y t Cu tYIMIT A Vememe_a � f., flea 1.F 1TEN 8809 S. F, P C.C. Cur S 8 F. Drive a - sid alk.F' 24• gutter P_ /I '- S.F. Preca�'.!_°ross e,,.._ _ 6.00 i CITY of RA1H:liD CU FOR IMPROVp1E1ii AGREE TRIL'T 12952 LIKE 4P MM ORAIM KHOn ALL o BY THESE PRESEMfS: That this a Into. in conformance with the provisions greement r State of California, and o/ the a of the SubdlvlsiOntMaj and entered hereinafter Creferreda• a municipal Pllca0 Ordinances of P Act of thE. hereinafter referred to as as the OftCOrPOration the City of Rancho and The Developer,and Glenfed Developme to Cop ation rporatton WITHESSETH: THAT, as sal' Developer desires to develop said City as wn an the cl'per desire approved o ri 12952; and P certain real prop•r�y 1n subdivision known as Tract Uevelape�s aid City has established certain requirements east of Haven, west e t° approval of said subdivision e genertll Deer Creek Channel 10pt by sold NOW, THEREFORE, 1t is hereby th Of Highland. Y locuted follows: Y agre±d by said City and by said Developer as I• The Developer, hereby agrees to construct at p ex ense all Improvements described effective data hereof. 0° Pa9e 6 hereof Cevelo er's p within twelve months from the 2• This egreeaknt shall be effective on the date of Council of safd City approving this ere default on the day toll the resolution of the unless an extension of °wing the first anniv This agree ent shall be in :rovided. time has been anniversary d :te .r said granted by safd City as hereinafter hereof, The �YQiOPer mxy request an extension of time 30 Such request shall b,> submitted 30 Cars before the erotration date hereof the City 0 complete the terms right stances necessitatir the • and shall n 1Priting not less than to review the 9 extension of time, contain a statement of standards, cost estimate. aeons of this agreeaxnt The City Lhall have the therein if any substantial change ease ant security S thedte�th0 constructfor, rred Y snd to rsquire adjustments this 4a If the Deheeloper falls or neglects to comply herea /, provlsionse o City shall have the right et w ith the provisions of Developer to be met V any lawful Pe and /or his surety the full eostaaand c+e� thereupoolarecto cause said The Developer shall provide expense incurred. wat development in yaWateraDist tct. the metered Cucamonga Count to each lot of said I and fees of the 16601 Ventura ea.lsvard Enclno. CA 91836 const6 The Developer shall ruction n required of bar res and [tie owner of such wateraprOV�entst th Irrigation fwaterpSyst�nt' relocation, or 7• I sYStem, adtl5fatpOn 1^ annflict Orawfn �'rOVemeots °f the City Engineer gs and Standard Specied he approved Specfficattons are tabulatednd on file In the °f the City shall conform to th rnee 6 hereof, as ttak CO nrtructlortice of the a ^d tO the 1 e Standard DeIncf 1 als maD^rov mL Estlmate,nher' SaidricP v nas other incf�entala cork 0p the 1 0 6e responsible four °t plans Y incur Pro 11 surface beyond the tract const listed thereon 6yrnumber. tted on shalt i corrected inage• Errors or 6ounda ^ieSCtion o/ an to scfd upon the dfr Omissions as neededyforans transitions p1n^ m°diflcatlons colon of the City EnOvered safe[ agreement and secured b shat) 6e Engineer. during constructf� D• Y he surety coverfnvered by the Rovlsed work due office ofCOnstructlon g the original Provisions of thereon the CftY EngI I s shall Planned works, this of dust shall be observed prior tube obtained by the Public ' noise, or ' with atten0 Start of work; all Developer fr shagutt b es andtCit nuisance to ,liven to safe[ gulatlons 11ste6 the be sub es to the Pena�ies�Prnts- Fallure to C0� o ej, n If1$ pro otffl. control The Deveia therefor. Y wfh thlsatlon of other debris fr Per shell be r s onsib)e for rmsr. section result,,, frpa irk Public ri way wlthon 9hts•• al o► 10• pork eiattve to said deve1Opment�r adJ0inlnDi$did loose development eventet,on; the C1t within "Istln of unJustified de111 have the9 fight to c$hall bean.Y angently i) dill incurred from I Develop I0 cosDTetfon and and °nPlete Pursued to and al Developer she l) !or his contractor bycYriawf ° ft And expense In the scfd nr 1 In suhidivisfon follOwin u1 "°cans. scfd 1 tt to the traveling pu6iffe pP ee ald Cfty �ouncilhe 9 deditat,no of he streets Stre or dun et °r easaax:nt, and will and every den give goad °mod d acceptance of g °roue conditions. Drotect the !raveling pub,t�tif°, sf chnt in wal sand Unt11 the be perfo C°'Pletion of defective Of said d, each of Perm lcthar,, subject to the Cler. e�Sa Id oot ac loD herein as Improvement on PagO 7 Y street Deveio atce ted rPOrated Jubllc durfued by the th conditions Conti err maY Close all shall 6e under ' nP the conatrucLlongpfee i perovementsnis necessary Y toreetrclosure 12. ParPwa Developer after yo hers 14Rufred to be herein agreed t Dbetmade�he 0791eted Ptangtinnmg Shall a done 'vork,pl9radfngsha�a 6e Planted by he the Punting dfa r aP�rOVed by this e City Provided Ord once in has with been Pment Director. rs•, The Developer shall be responsible health until the end ofie for after Planting. ,end maintenance all tre good is iateara'•eed c all trees 13. Dianted 1n by the Cl The Oeveloper_is responsible for or fur one year constrameueted othereunde loop SubdlvfSion Map Cit the develo g all conditfens established the City, and no Improvement th an the maintenance Ordiances, before such and Impr unless seeurt�trovement is of all f and this Council of the city. Y Provided accepted for mafnmtep vements This y, othenvlse provided erefnwlth shall nt released security he etnagreeme shall not a"0 authorized by the City i` after e agreement to descrlbed has terminate until th to the Cft 6ether with the required s been released by he °ylntenance Council same YhassucgSsor to the {m0rrvement Y the City' or guarantee security therefor bee^ accepted beret° named, and b Security has beegns�l a new has been re leased, and this 'agr Y resolution submitted 15. The 1 cement and the of the City agreement lap security to Improvement the City Attorneyconsist of the to be furnished by following and shall a the Developer with this A• To secure faithful be in a f °sm acceptable by 1• A bond or bunts Performance of this 2. An etmp oveemeendn content one or specifieed bt °IY autho�i,ed corporate by the i t withey,1tY InatromentDin t�fo�de Sect, 66q ties 1n 3' A deposit approved far t, the City of content specified B' To and secd re laborers anddx4terl Of Public monies le the kind one money or 1• t bond bonds of 3 • A d he City and conte Or A t me nt r1 YelnstrdnLBtvernmentZ Code °cif to sureties 1n °posit with Orne of n the Po on 66499,2 for securfn rte and content specified C. A cash de g money °r negotiable bonds of the engineer oP0 1 with the City to The kind approved the setting of all bounder certificate as Psyment 5y the and for furnishing center)inelote PPears Final pap to deposit may be corner, and street the Final ffa acceptable any amount certified notes to the City. Lm ntor• shall be Dayment in full• by the Cit , mbn s as shown on the Corstr, If no value a The no a°�dnt of the Said and Band submfttedor surveyor as receipt rash deposit Estimate ' the cash bond Paymet in the rit s'ds' bo centers de s Procadurontainec herein. refunded all frYomOf he soon as p, engineer or Soon eycetes and written essays after The required S0ry'e assurance of Page 6 of this agreement. and the Principal 9 ement, Pal a+sPunts thereof are set forth on , k, ,Y 3o ®>r 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in mater'als and workmanship. Any and all portions of the improvements found to be defective within one (1) year following the data on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City, The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten torsecurelthe faithful perform nce of estimate or this paragraph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. once the improvements have been accepted and it maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Nap Act and any applicable City Ordinanen. 17. That the Devi and property damage i subcontractor perforct property damages which operations under this any contractor or s said persons, even Developer or any i persons. The publi City as addttonsl U and employees, as subcontractors, and The minimum amounts er shall take out and ruaintain such public liability rance as shall protect him and any contractor or work covered by this agreement from claims for y arise because of the nature of the work or from :dent, whether such operations be by himself or by actor, or anyone directly or Indirectly employed by such damages be not caused by the negligence of the for or subcontractor or anyone employed by said ility and property damage Insurance shall list the and directly protect the City, Its officers, agents ewell insurance policiesoissuedhhereunder ashall so states Of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence with an aggregate Developer in�the�pperfot laims w ich mayk hasten room dedderations of the D. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the Performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than 5500,000 for each person and 51,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than 5250,000 for a accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not teas Contractor performming theework providedrforohereinshe Developer or his 31 a ""NORM " htfh "" the that before sPecff;'ed insur a CerttftceCi1tfon of t Prec ate or h1r agre by ludln9 the CarCe'IatfEach cert/f1 e10ent, carrier�aveCrece+�eelbeforesjh ruedutft�lfl,;ates shall su0ance-- covshall file ed nntlffc a exPiratfon in coves bear ering the coop ly etlon by Of thirty days Policy nevfdencc,s As evfdenc0 of underste�dln Vith 1� vement secu � tiro S 9r theCer visions coot frog the 1 the City Y. and has affixed hir submitte hereto follanlnOf rest fbed ,�ti e F-4111EUL ►ERFOgWE Name and address of surety: FIDELITY Principal Amount: $209,000 C COMPANY OF Mp1RYLAND T ype: MATERIAL 'M LANR DAYNERT Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: FIDELITYDEPOSIT CW9Ally $104,500 OF RARYLARp Ck% CMSIT M MLp"TATION Type: Name and addre• of surety: Principal Aaount: M/A MMINrOLICE GUARANTEE Type: Nara an Principal Anouat: d address of surety: To K POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTAMCE or THE CITY duly executed and�ackncw edged with hereto caused theca presents to Oe dates set forth opposite their signatur �l "fes r y law on the Date required b ��_ by nature Developer Kenneth Green - Assistant Vice p r n e resident Date 11 IL�b gnat o Developer Jerry England - Vice presie ent Accepted: printed —'—� City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation BY: Attest: Mayor City clerk Approved: City Attorney DkIETWM'S SIGNATURE X= NE NOTARIZED 400 C00"M IN TRIPLICATE M aa_ an4� -Y1iir �. t et• e I, Ls CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION For Improvea:an t: EMCROACNMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE Date: Tract No. 12952 - 4P Storm Drain File Re erne., Sectesoer .. ,......_ — _ _....y .v _ fee orf MOTE: Does not Include current Writing permit or Paveeent deposits 513 PRICE L F. 60n RCP '1 11 0 AMOUNT �— ESF Desilttnr1Soo 0� 96.00 —r EA. Manhole 0 Basin 91.00 �49 24.B.no :ins 34u EA. Junction :t,- ucture 25.000.00 _T EA• 2000.00 — Outlet structure, 5000.00 � • 7000.00 ENGINEERING INSPEC770N IE: •RESTORATION _0.-� 85 /DELINEAT101 CASH a98n SUB TOTAL CONTINGENCY COSTS MONUMENTA7IO,vFgETYE(CASMI FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE �173 782 DO 75U6.4p N/A 8DND (100;) •--�_ LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (501 1pursuant -,a9 -� 00 to C Bernardino County co a Titles s Chen" llunfciv -1 Code, Title I Be made prior toy1� cetof 1. G9, 00 adopting San ash rostoraticn /delineation deposit shall ae Eng neerin9�Constructlon permit. Revised 3184 i 3 5' RESOLUTION NO. ?b �5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORYIA APMOVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND TAPROVEMERT SECURITY FOR TRACT 129552 EHT THPROVEYFNT SECURITY ACCEPTED ONO CTOBERRE15. 1966AN D WHEREAS. Tract Nu. 129552 Heated cast of Haven Avenue west of Deer Creek Channel and South of Highla.d Avenue, was approved by City Council on October 15, 1986; and S' WHEREAS, the subdivider, 6lenfed Development Corporation, has offerred the Iagrovement Agreement and Improvement Security submitted herewith for approval and execution by the City, as replacement for the security accepted by the City on Ortober 15, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as 1`011011s: 1 That said Improvement Agreement be and thb same is approved and the Mayo- is authorized to exMte same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized t0 attest thereto; !nd 2. That said Imprcvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the taprovenent Agreement and the Improvement Security accepted on OctWer 15, 1986, be released. i _ . ea:'. S': - r F CITME �BA,r,JD� EGA nber 17, 1986 Council and Cit Y Manager ndra (Shintu 1 Bose, Senior C1v91 En W Beek, Engineers gineer a) Technician of of parcel MaP 10223 Properties Street located at . Inca and Maven Aveaue, tsul'a orthe st rporated '"1IDATION It is recommended that �precord,Parcel Nap 102Z3 any aCouncil adopt Me attache) resolution Ana lysis /BackgrowN Y Clerk to cause sag, Parcel Map 10223 was Igo. for the divfsfI Of { 2gbecresnnofgl��ission on Industrial Park Development Ofstriac S1xth Street and haven and Into 2 November 112e tfne of buildin Avenue. emeots are top northeds� is 1n of 9 Permft issuance taProv corner A Reciprocal a constructed at the C "y Attorney.�cess and Maintenance A9re°nrnr nos Respectfully been approved 4 Me submitted, RSB:LB:cg Attachments .r i' h' i; ly • Jr 1 �•fl o f, Ie1.K r.at •• • •pC ISJ rf.IK �. I rRf •1./ y � ��� I .IwM � h© •1 � WLK frOK � rU p 4 1 r 1 rltl.f Q 1 h n nllfLn 1 M1 /1h • y /,� • y r•,1 � � •r•• ffIJK YM1 LVIAM+`1111 'r •aK er' O /y,f . rCI �.. /•.= IM 0 1 CI'jy OF ECHO CUCAMONGA BNQIIa=MO DIVIMON M •t. i y,�� s_ Yom.. rally ?� \ �• YSL`fAZ�ai � 4�`.JWIii�CiliW`Y�w11.�7+C.; now (TIN1SUB SUBDIVISION H0nu6ond Cfty C ETGTEE 'to PEFR7WN ouncfl OF FINAL RON 6E UHE Pt 0. °Bora807o Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Calffornla 91730 Gentlemen Pursuant undersl t0 Chapter q Of Sned hereby Article 9 Y agrees that, section 66497 the neer or sury all of showe Government cnde the Englneerls ey0r. °n or a Dire to ba n and on , :hereon to furnished the - nal the Of the Goverf1M ntecoSelleenglneer r sate and a by as su6dfvlde.�as Code. 9 requirements sp es specffled in foeund-rslgned sPeciffrd urnlsh the willq9� hands ae horewfth the sum S 1n Section 66497, as a cash specified and the notes fu deposit o _ and that the engineer t° guarantee t It is further °r s above provided on (Receipt complete agents Surveyor in the be Paid b or handers gn monuments completed tf s '1° h0 rized remd agrMfthfo t event the Y the date from the Cash v Ranch tCucamonga se to e $aid me specified. be tZ uirementnst sa1d1City ea to be °m said deposit 9a is charge a cause th !t is further edit t0 make the cash deposit, Lit,• Council t agreed that if the undersigned the OroPer city fundecessarY fransfar final Or suction 66497 an thf if Paid ang neer engineer rdoes not Yor present e Gov yor, th° deposit Code gives gives the the setting of he If the cash p herein Cft notices cast of made. shall pay to Prescribed deposit, the und'OmPlcting said requirements said engineer er said re untiofnthe Qlffe statem qt arPaythe df °fereeds the amount �quirements�O/%erence between thee Cfty ofeRancho C n thirtyf 30) cash th 1 G;k'ICL.F� cash deposit and thepactual specify I f9 I zalk t,9 124 --'140 Subdivider Date _� �'� Address The de$ 1985 be Pos her of . ecord Artcal pro erti me ifor, rata Cue0 Br etoltfalbf the call deposit) steal TO Be to Mea ersCA 97626 D• Sulte 104 1 NOTE: IONS $UP,1tI ITED FULLY FLCED ` u. ` OUrAna51CMEp7v GUARANTEE NO iSC1TING OF FINAL NAL HONUlfEliiS) CityofuRancho Cucamonga C,t P. 0. Box 807 Ran,:ho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: lbnuBond Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, SectT�n 66497 of the Government Coda. ,,ndorsigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown en nee the engineer' �rveyor on pr are to be set and furnished by theesufinaldemap the Engineers or Surveyor'soCegrtl�{{ thereon to c•:mpiete all englneeeir Cate an a as suecified io Of the Goverment Code. 9 requirements 9� ees •o .urnish the notes pecifled in Section 66497, No undl99- ;1yoed hands you herewith the st, of S loon e --- ii-iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii� will b—'" as a cash deposit, said deposit to e set and the notes furnished as above provided on tat t e m(Receipt specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be the date It Is further understood and agreed that to the event he by the. complete the above requirements within the drop specified, Cucamonga is authorized to undersigned fails to completed and the cost complete said requi ements o the City of Rancho and The City gf RanchO Cucamongaiistauthorizeda f� makelthernecescash Posit, from said cash to be deroslt to the credit for the proper city fund. It is further Y transfer City final Council monuments, has paid If i the e undersigned osrrveyorpforetheevidence setting of the and if the ien ineer r in Section 66491 of the Government Code, the surveyor shall the notices Or surveyor, the cash deposit hereto made. ces prescribed Y shalt pay to said engineer e the cost of completing said requlrcments exceeds the deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty after recelring vrit•.en statement muIt Of the cash the amount of the difference betweern the ash deposit and the actual` cost aof said requirements. Y of Rancho Cucamonga specifying 7 o dialty /i G j r 8% r`W Subdivider 4 costa M x26 Addi Date P e.py. et 1 85 The depositer o record be (for return of any Y portion of the cash deposit) shall Arical Pro ertiee, Inc 2900 BrlBtol, Bldg. gam Co8ta Mesa, CA 92GD' Suite 104 s NOTE: To BE _ A ress �U971ITTE0 FULLY FILLED ?/17/86 �8 OUT AND SIGHED IN TRIPLICATE _ RESOLUTICM N0. 9( — 3,5 a, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NUMBER 10223 (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP N0. 10223) !SAP Pr ertles, WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap Number 10223, submitted by Ar,cal oA Incorporated and consisting of 2 Parcels, located on the northeast corner of Sixth Street and Haven Avenue being a division of Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map x544 as per plat recorded in Book 6S of Parcel Naps, gages 63 and 64 official records of San Bernardino County, State of Ca1,turnia was approved by the Plarning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and "EREAS, Parcel Map Number 10223 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel NAP; and NHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. of Rancho CucaHOWW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE by He City Council of the City came is hereby approved and the City Engineer Is authorized det l Present same to th3 County Recorder to be filed for record. a�,— �� DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 17, 1986 City Council and City Manager Raihindra (Shintu) Bose, Senior Civil Engineer Malt Stickney, Assistant Civil Engineer 0 U01"7 Vacation a an locate easement located ea unused portion of the City drainage st of Jasper Street at Yicara Drive rIEClEWATIOH It is recomended that the City Council adopt ePProring the vacation of an unused portion dopthe e and authorizing the 1a attached rasolurian Mayor and City C ark to record Cf `lrainaga easement olutl n ANALYSIS /BACKDROUIB) nes meVIcaras Drive request from a Property o'mer on Jasper Street easement which their property backs onto (See ottachec Exhibit 'A•), Portion of the City drainage lmprovemen� cent development north of the site, which included the sto mentioned easement is no longer required. that portion of the above- Section 8333 of the Streets and Hfeheays Code states that fecal agencies ofYacqufsitionvtsales(by rosolution) Public Service ems preceding the then five years and more ements if the date continuously since that dateacation and the easement if immediately The above- mentioned ems not used recorded August 30 ement was accepted b the Streets and Highways ' I982 and meets the sueeyrlly� cation provag o lutIon Code. Respe lly s� ted, RSB:MS :cg :tc�g° -7 0 F Y• s ra+ M, h•4,Y T� I i lid � 7'�t. 9LT7' a,` ; 1 u w 40 ) Lr 1 ,� Cm OF PANCHO CLtgXUUGA EW&IMY9 !3N y� 4 A I w FG r j' wn SLe ryVacat ]II 1.064 ' ULL vtr.'iAI1V PAP EXHIBIT 'A' TNY i %4K, jI, LOT 1. TRACT 9060, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PIX S 79 014MI 6!1 IC;IDSTYE OF W,? BOOKS, IM THE OFFICE OF TPE COUNTY V% 7DEK OF JW r pARDr9O , RIMY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MORE PARTICULARLY DES yQa�Y � 1,r H� 1,4: tt 0Ll!"Ex V- " "A �A:� =.OV OF SAID LOT 1; TKEk& -S 690 56' 20' Y A Of St QI[l J► . w T r xyr yE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE TRUE K r, OF Mdflkl3p1 4,00. FUT WESTERLY ALONG SAID WORTHERLY LINE; ^ 2iA 47' -V E A ai+N�F V 91 MT TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TA*,', f -dVL tKAYC $b im Wm,; amNCt SOUTHEAL7 ALONG THE ARC OF SAID MVE TO THE QIGMT, HAYING A FAOIUS R 120.00 `IM K, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 230 11' 03' POP AN ',RC DMAMCE (-* Mot PEET Tr< A POINT C41 A TANGENT LIME 30.00 Fl 1 HACitDA Al, bF. WJ 7KjD AT `AEGH T JM", A:.. P'9ALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LPE uF SAID LOT 11 THENCE N 00+ 38' Or $ ALONG SAID PAR UEL LINE A DISTANCE OF !26.23 FEET; T.'ENCE M AL"' 19' 58% N A DISTANCE & 4.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT CF BEGINNING CONTAINS 0.0623 ACRES OR 2670 + SQUARE FEET. r) ..Y: TRACT HO. 0m('11,3® I N b!• 56' 2o' E. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECT: V -06"' TITLE: EXHIBIT: `f 3 RESOLUTION N0. Dtp " 663 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON61, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY DOMING THE VACAT ?ON OF A PORTION 7 A CITY ORAINAGE EASEMENT WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Articla 1, Section 8330, of tha Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of a City drainage " easement hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Cou{Kil found from all the evidence submitted that said portion of said drainage easement, dedicated over one yeas ago has not teen used for it, intended purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1: The Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of sM dr—Mage easement as shown on Nap V -054 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached horoto, marked Exhibit 'A', and by reference made a part thereof. Section 2: That from and after the date this resolution is recorded, 1, saTF—po-r-fion of said drainage easement no longer constitutes a public 7 service easement. ;t Section 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this res— Tuffon to oe recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. it f Y M j qq e I DATE: TO: FROM: BY: S16JECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT o 8 December 17, 1986 a > t9r, City Council and City Manager Rathindra (Shinto} Bose, Senior Civil Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9646 located at the northeast corner of Moonstone Avenue and Hillside Road submitted by Dr. Irwin Golden. RECOMMEMATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attachad resolution approving Parcel Map 9645, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to causo said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Parcel Map 9646 was ap roved by the Planning Commission or, June 25, 1986, for the division of 4.37 acres into 4 parcels in the very low Residenticl Development District located at the northeast corner of Moonstone Avenue and Hillside Road. The Developer, Dr. Irwin Golden, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $13,000 Labar and Material Bond: $ 6,500 Monumentation Cash Depos't $ 1,400 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerks's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Respectfully submitted, RSG:LB:cg Attachments E, c E I I I i 1 O Oa O ••a I rwai .. yl a � 1 t � � 1 f Ia 1 ; •i O O ¢ Ir ' r . 1 O a 7 t ..—t Irra '•• r'if ; 4 a • — t 3 t ' SITE „ j \ ` O O A tv ti ttlt ti �- O � r ^• 41Y [��..�IaAWa•auu•1•tal��ua�.�� 1 ..�..�.•Oa6�.� M r-- V CrrY OF TTEU PARCEL MAP 9646 RANCHO CUCAMONGA zZTLE; VICINITY MAP ENGDMEMNG DramoN EXMBr ; " A " ■: 9 {� 9 i %x. gF i N I I Ell, n CITY OF RARCHO CUCNVIGA IMPROVEMENT ACREDUT FOR PARCEL IMP 9646 (Parcels 1 and 2) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, to conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Cade and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Dr. Iran Golden hereinafter referred to as the Developer. THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certato real property to said City located northeast corner oil Moonstone Avenue and Hillside; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and postlnq of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpos5 of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof wi'hir. 12 months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the oay following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has teen granted by said City as hereinafter provided. , 3. The Developer may r.,umst additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon zo recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full carat and expense incurred in so doing. 77 East Seventh Street Upland, CA 91785 i 5 Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the 3 office of tea ^ity, Engimcr prior to start of any work within U1e public r right -of -way, and tie developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the reg•ilations contc1red therein. Men -compliance may result in stopping r r of the work tor the City, and assessunt of the penalties provided. {' S, public right -cf -way Improvement work required shall be , constructed in "'iforaence wi ^ "h apprv.ed improvement plans; Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any :pedal amendments thereto. Construction shell include any transitions and /or other incident&] work deennd necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or omissions discovered ' during construction shall be corrected upon the directinn of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety cov +.ring the original planned works. { 7. York lone within existing streets shall to diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to rtcover all cost and expanse incurred from the Developer arA /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any ceponent of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. } 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The Develcper shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Developient Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the tons of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement 3 security shall not be less than the amount shown: 1: i� r Y tl Sf � , r y . :tar �..•M1.# I FAITHFUL PERFORM ACE Type: Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LANKA Type: Principal Amount: Mane and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMBITATION 13,000 $6,500 Type: Principal Amount: $1,400 Name and address of surety: TD K POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their sIggnatures. Date I +ITI T 6 by R.. , Developer 519nature D r. i�r 2'rwiu — n e Date by . Developer �ur C Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: _, Mayor Attest: -------C1'Ey- Cicrk --' Approved: y ttarnel DEVELOPER'S SMATMES MUST CC NOTARIZED AND COWL.TED IN TRIPLICATE 3 I. Improvement: CITY OF A MCHO QXMUM ENCINEIRM6 DIVISION 2MCN ZWOT PERMIT FEE SCMEDULE City Drawing No. innry — Oees not i;.:lude current fee ^cv tang permit ce patsaet deposits _ QUANTITY UNIT ITEN PRICE AMOUNT 405 L. F. P.C.C. curb - 8' C.F. 244 gutter 6 000 2,4430_ --MU— S..•. Drive approach --3dO- -T6F- S.F. 80 P.C.C. cross gutter 3.40 —�- -TAU— S.F. Preparation of subgrade 0.15 �7Ef9 -- JZW-- S.F. Crushed egg. base (per inch thick)40 0.03 -R4— S.F. A.C. (3' thick) 0.55 '77A- 74W— S.F. 1' thick A.C. overlay 0.30 -� EA. Street lights 1000.OG 3UJT— M — S.F. Removal of A.C. pavement 0.35 --4U - L.F. Removal of A.C. berm 1.00 L S Earth Work ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 645 SU8 TOTAL 11.221 mRESTDRATION/DELINEATIIjON CASH �— CONTINGENCY COSTS (15 %) �- IMMUMENTATION SUSURETYE(CASH) 1.400 LABOR MD NAT CBOND (50%) +Pursuant to City or Rancho CuueeMa Nonictpal Cole, Title I, Chapter 1.08, aaopting San 8ernordino County Cale Titles, Chaptws 1 -5, a cash restoration /delineation deposit stall be aN, prigr to Issuance of im Engineering Construction Permit. n ' Revised 3/84 t •� CITY OF NAMCM7 CUCJNO106I FA17HFUL MUD ONCE BOND WHEREAS, ^he City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Dr. Irwin Golden (hereinafter designated as 'principal•) have entered into m agre•.mant whereby primipal egrets to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 190 and identified as protect Parcel Hap 9 (parcels n y s are referred to and nude a part hrreof; and, WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for tre faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and ompany as surety, ore held and firmly bound-" on o a y o anc n ucamonga ( hereinafter called 'City), in the penal sem of thirteen thousend Dollars (513,000) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and administrators, Jointly we andiseverally ,firmly byitheseupresents; exucutors and The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement aid aaappny andeperformedratfthedtime lard to the mannerntherein sp%tifleit, ndbinkalI respects according to their true intent and r+ening, and shall indemnify and save harmiess Ctty, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation soured hereby and in addition to the face expenses and nd fe s. including reasonable lattorney'su fees, costs and d reasonable successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any Judgment rendered. surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed %hereunder or the specifitations accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such changt, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instr�mt0nece tier been duly executed by y the principal and surety above named, on at Irvin Golden American Motorist• Insurance r (Developer) li 0 //�/ na ure Pa�" ° idme %rac PLEASE ATTAM FWEr OF ATTORNEY TD ALL WADS SIGNATURES MUST K NOTARIZED MUST K CDWLE'EO 1M TRIPLICATE So,Z r�;l %` CITY Of RIM" CUCIIUM LABOR MO MATEIIIAL M =0 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Dr.*.rwin Golden (hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and coep':te certain designated public Improvements, which said agreement, dated 198 , and identified as project Parcel Map S646 arce s I and is her 86`y re of rrad to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required hefore entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho .Ucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material man and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and raferred to in the aforesaid Coda of Civil Procedure in the sum of six thousand, five hundred Dollars ($6,500), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety wilt pay the same in an amount not excee^ing the amount hereinabove sat forth, and also in case suit 1s brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs oral reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred by City 1n successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the Judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this hard shalt inure to the benefit of any and all persons, canpanies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 ( coameneing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Divison 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought u" this bond. Should the condition of this bond be ful'y pperformed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain In full force and "• affect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accopanying the same shall in any canner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive noti,.e of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, tnis instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on December 4th , 1986 American Ud or aC/ I¢eurance Company )Per ure y i (Signature) orney- r- Fa —R7-- Paul E. Edmater PLEASC ATTACK IOWA OF ATVOM1EY 1C ALL BONDS SIMIIITURES MUST BE XOTARI2LD MIST BE COMM.ETED IN MIPLICATE 53 SUMIIVISION GiIMANTEE NO PERFORIWiCE (SETTING OF FINAL NONLINMIS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of tha Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments .shown on the final map of Parcel Nap 9646 are to be set and furnished by the subdividar's engineer or surveyor on or before January 1988, as specified in the Eng•oneer's or Surveyor's Certificate and agrees to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The undersigned hends you herewith the sum of S 1,400 (Receipt No. MLU as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monusents will-R-s-aT and the notes furnished as above provided on or before the date•specifiaJ and that the engineer or surveyor wilt be paid by the undersigned. It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requirements or cause them to be completed and the cost thereof is to be a charge against said cash c posit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to nuke the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed In Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the e:.,unt of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of sa'd requirements. Cordially, ne t�ln Ggldar Subdivider ,yZ cev --•b car Address Upland, CA 91786 Date December 8, 1986 The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be sacs as above Name ress NOTE: TO E SUINITTED FULLY °ILLEO OUT AND SIGNED IN TRIPLICATE .lV A 1N MO S INSURiNCFCOM ► dNY Rom0NIa: InnC1*MIL80069 POWER OF ATEORMEY gnewAg Men lyThew l! "am Tha tt*Amdanhtomdsblnsurasue Company, amrporatlan alPnlad andexisdnsunxkrthe laws old*Stateofdllrwls, and havins Its pdndpal rJflce In lens Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint ....... .o........o....,..uoo........... Paul E. Ldaeier, Hill K. Heist & Beverly BEartia of Los Aageles, California (sACB)�«s«eeeease ere.«ea fo tnn use:awlut a6erbtOl tnrl atlaney(s}trwtt, m mate, aeraAq feY, and deliverdnlnt Ube peed bginnlns whh thedaN of Iwwboa of IN$ porter asd ardine Dkwnba 31,1906, Unless sooner sanded far and on as bowsm; wnty, and a Its as and dmd: Any anti all bonda and undertakings provided the aaount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds TWO MIKn ED 3•IPT% THOU3AHD DOLUM ($250.000.00)t**m IXCEFrn0N: NO AUT1101tITY h eranled m main, exacvr +eel and deBwr shy bond or adrddryl width sVsaanres du Payment acolMtllon d" pranlaory roe, dw drahroVm —o( This ddoes not ar forthrmoblipelonmbe Wit Imo two amorebadsInadsrtobsin 0eachwetbandwidUindw This appolntrsbesMmay ba nvdnd a<arrytime by iheAnwlan A1[blorlab htnrerUR CompenK THIS APPOINTMENT SHAIECEASE AND TERMINM WIIHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31,1968. This Power of Atmmey Is executed by rkrodrt of a realutlan dopW by IM beard of Dimma of sate Amedcan Momrlsn Irnurence Cr�oanv on May 20, 1981 u 1.wz Grow, punoi a mm and xemaw wpy of which b heseinalw set IoM and b Iwreb; cord boy the wderslen.a sevetanaabNnalrtful� force and a6.r8 IolloowinS resolution adosseed by 1981: I OM AW*&a A �MoWTgw@C0 d� - A im1 slow and Its mporu"a n Y,eafloen d Aunit 9 r!r hhm arilmlon*Wra:Novwnbw18.1966 r>MSSw.It•H.rrynauc 046141 axe 14 PIUIMDfHUSA M�MNrr+y -1m SS ■ = « i r alnwuna, �, I,Swn Lloh�nsn�5ecrwiydlMh +n�rlanAlotar{wsMwrsnn t 11.1 Y.��r, ES12 I.dH�j�t� dsmd�iiSLY! anbcfwlfd 16L. _ r'i—is Tice �*iiises�w & Deverly lie In of WO Ausile", _ fo a =1lL`H Isatrue and coneq ao"and unit Ito bem In full lotce and~ Slna ft dale C'esaofand Is In full tone and efka en the dam a dils smdllar, and I eo fj:dw ardty dui du uW G. H. KadwAm MW R H.lehnsm who axeaed tho /oIAW of Aumwy as IAo Fmldam and Seowry mpocdv*wmon flu date dthammo tlon of du arAdmd Powerof,43=W dw duty I Suva aloe This Pom o(AMffWy Ilmtb the acts of have no audadty to bind the Company 'l e and affixed du wrporm wal o(do Amman MoaxrW bnur _,19 srn t.wlrua.s.v..,t. w bonds andwxW Wnp speciffalty stilleddureto,andthey 4344 7M 1M >T.9L +t'ii',Ti;':U:,<'�4,'e ..j?l , 1 .,> , . ti.• tt' ' l _ i, J `P 'wrr,� RESOLUTION NO. &" — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRUVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9646, (TENTATIVE PARCEL NQ NO. 9646), IMPROVEMENT AGREEME —WT,' AND I14PROVENEU SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 9646, submitted by Dr. Irwin Golden, and consisting of 4 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Moonstone Avenue and Hillside Road, being a division of Lot 6, Block 13, Land of Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California was approved by the Planning Commd!sion as provided in the Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of raid City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 9646 is the final sap of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHERE,%% to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to offering the Final forsaid publicsubdivider the weei s delineatedathereonFinal Map NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by t1-A City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is app ss roved and the Mayor is authorized to execute saw on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 that said Improvement Security is accepted as good and vufficient. subiect to approval as to fors and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. Thit the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 57 R DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: RECONF3IDATI01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f STAFF REPORT ��' C O O December 17, 1986 City Council and City Manager UM Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer Michael 0. Long, Senior PUeiic Works Inspector Recommendation to-award the Improvement. of Archibald Avenue at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad north of 8th Street to the apparent lowest responsible bidder, Bruce Paving Company for the amount of 572,319.00 It is recommended that City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the improvement of Archibald Avenue at thn Atchison. Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, north of 8th Street to the lowest bidder, Bruce Paving Company for the amount o. 572,319.00. ANALYSIS /NACY,GROUhO Per previo Council action, bids were solicited, received and q fined on November 19, 1986 for the subJoct, protect. Bruce Paving Company is the apparent lowest responsible`bldder with a bid amount of 572,319.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $49,585.00 Staff has reviewed all bids received and flnq them to be complete and in accordance with the old requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. I Respe�ctfYylly submitted, MP:ML:cg Attachments t'S' °7� &a '' I•i 1 58 ■ 0 I 6 'tol in Situ m f|I PIF lif #f �f| ! IR lei P11 \ I /�h/ E | | t � a E , , ■- ;| \7 \. | | ; ; | ; ||| a` \� | | | | ; | | |� �• §q 0. tt ,| k 8 | |� 2| j dƒ ` } \ Sf � .. f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1986 p 1 TO: City Council and City Manager ivn FROM: nathindra (Shinto) Dose, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Judy A. Aros•s, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13062 located north of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archbald Avenues, submitted by Lincoln Property Company, N.C. Incorporated RECONI"BATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution app ving Tract 13067. acceptiug said agreement and security and authorizing the 'Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tract 13062 was approved uy the Planning Commission on August 28, 1985, for the division of 8.6 acres into 1 lot in the Medion Development District located north of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archibald Avenues. The Developer, Lincoln Property Company, M.C. Incorporated, 1s submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performnco Bond: $ 261,000.00 Labor and Mrtorial Bond: S 130,500.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerks's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga Countj Water District. C.C. &R.a have also been approved by the City Attorney. Respectfully submitted. RSB:JAA:cg Attachments •Rn tp J I. y I �•I � I i I i n• II , I f A CTIII Rif r C11Y Or- RANCHO VJCAMONGA APROYEfENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 13062 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered Into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Lincoln Property Company, N.L. Incorporated hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property In said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract 13062; and WHEREAS, —Id City has established certain requiraaents to be met by said ;eveloper as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located north of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archibald Avenues. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 6 hereof within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to the City In writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the rignt to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require adjustments therein if any substanti" change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the_Develraer s or ney to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. 5. The Developer shall provide metered water service to esch lot of said development in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water District. 16152 Beach 8ouievar,i, Suite 140E Huntington Beach, CA 92647 4;;L 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction or' required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner o` such water system. 7. Improvements required to be constructed Drawings and Standard Specifications of the Citl approved by and on file in the office of the Cit; are taoulated on the Construction and Bond Est page 6 hereof, as taken from the irtprovement pl The Developer shall also be responsible for cons' other incidental work beyond the tract bounder proper ,—face drainage. Errors or omissions shall be corr:cted upon the direction of the C11 to said plan modifications shall be covered agreement and secured by the surety covering the shall conform to the Standard and to the Improvement Plan Engineer. Said improvements mate, hereby Incorporated on ins listed thereon by number. ruction of any transitions or les as needed for safety and Iiscovered during constructln yby the o Revised rk due provisions ufthis original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the oftice of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control cf dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of pibllc utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section stall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining sold development resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Work done within existing streets shell be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to template any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedication of the streets and easements In said subidlvision, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or Improvement by said City Council, give good and adequato warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent In said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the completion of all improvements, herein incorporated on Page 7 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditiuns contained In a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. 12. Parkway, trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other Improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting snall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. 2 The Developer, shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later. 13 The Developer is responsible for meeting all conditions estahllshed by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed thereunder until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, aid no improvement security provided hereinwith shall be ra.cased before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of thn City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released ty the City, or urtil a new agreement together with the required improvement security ),as been submitted to the City by a successor to the he.ein named, and by resnlutlnn of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one at- more duly authorized corporate suretits in the furm and content specifieo by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improverent Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved frr securing deposits of public monies. B. To secure laborers and materia imen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content spacift,d by Government Code ,action 66499.2, 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in tl,. form aid content ^ pecified by the City Attorney. J. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the sett, ng of all bounderv, lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furr.104:,g centuline tic notes to the City. The amount of the deposi, man be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor ,s acceptable palmert in full. or, it no value is submitted, the cash lend shall be as shoim on the Construction and Bond Estia,V e contained ierein. Said cash dtooslt may be refunded as soon as procedure permits aft -ir receipt by tnu City of +ne centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in fu;i frsm the engineer or surveyor. 3 S� „ti r 0. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the Improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship• Any and all portions of the improvements found to be defective within one (1) year following tha data on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten percent (10X) of the construction estimate or S2DO.00, whichever As greater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obligations as described in this paragraph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work with res _ct to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described In this agreement may to released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Map Act end any applicable City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor perfonming work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages whicc may arise because of the nature of the work or from nperations under this agreemnt, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, eves though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The pilblic liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as additonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $250,OOC for each accident or occurrence with an agorrgate limit of SSDO,ODO for claims which may arise from the operations of the Developer In the performance of the work herein provided. 8 Automobile liability Insurance covering ail vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing boatly Injury liability limits of not less than SSOO,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $500,000 which may arise from the opera- tions of the Developer or his Contractor in performing the work provided for herein. 3v 18. That before- the. execution of th4s agreement, the Developer shall. - file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the• -: specified lasurance. Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement'- precluding the cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any policy evidences •' by such certificate,•before the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received notification by registered mail from the insurance carrier. icy As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the' following, described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: a, J t i C <S �y ` - � Y • r ''Ak%1 ?�'S�ri"KWiri,. .r9? �i G.cS• - t SC �°+.�� /J�i:S E, R 1, �... FAITHFa PERFORMANCE ! .. Type: Principal Amount: $261,000 = Name and address of surety: e MATERIAL AND LAM PAYMEMT Type: Principal Amount: $130,500 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MOR MENTATION " Type: Principal Amount: S 1,250 Name and address of surety: MAIMTENAMCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: MIA Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their ,siignaattures. Date 3 178 by Developer gna tune ure WI:W HT RSCH. Vice President me Date by Developer Signature r Printed Accepted: ` City of Rancho Cucamonga, a =nicipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk i r Approved: City Attorney 'ra # j »nfh DEVELCMIS SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED }v AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE • --'�' `� JI STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) f _ On SdytPVnbGV 3,rYoy , before me, .M,al�r the under�gne�NOtary Public in and for ea 6tate, personally appeared wILr.IAM N. HIRSCH, LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., ,e INC.; a Texas corporation, personally known to mo to be the persoi who executed the within instrument an Vice President or on t' behalf of the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. •t T , t f, A,-r�t�,u n. latti��_ der, Notary %nand or Orange 2' MCMELDN County, State of California r OPMMAY My Commission Expires= N_a t0 -av) O! i 1 i aE I. i 1• For I Date: File CITY OF RAMCNO CUCA ONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ENCRMCf/W PERMIT FEE SCIEDULF NOTE: Does not include current fee fo^ writing pemit or paveaent deposits 1 LLB.. i r� •5- [oc. UANTITY UNIT ITEM PRICE AMOUNT 545 L.F P.C.C. curb - 8" C.F. 244 gutter 6.00 3 270 M_ L.F. A.C. berm 4.50 �- 140 MEMTATION SURETY (CASH) 1,250 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (50X) T76.Sb�- 1.75 �850 1'5ZO— S.F. B° P.C.C. crossagutter (inc, curb) 3.40 —51168- - TSr50(f - S.F. Preparation of subgrade 0.15 Zjlb TS`SDb— S.F. �a7O— Crushed agg. base (per inch thick) 0.03 —7'178- TON A.C. (under SOO tons) 60.00 ___TU9— S.F. Patch A.C. (trench) 1.75 - lib 7— EA. Adjust sewer manhole to grade 250,00 �- �- EA. Street lights 1D00.00 �-Odi- j7d8— Trent L.F. Removal of A.C. be 1.OD —'f4d �— L.S. Concrete 5,000.00 5000 — (structures 35.00 19.'600 L.F. 360 RCP (2000 0) 49.00 1 Z74-- _76— EA. Catch basin N 22 4500.00- - —2— EA. -'1— Local deoression 33' 2,500.00 — b UQU - EA. Junction structure 5003.00 irrigation L.F. .F. 1pdr UtityUnegr ning TS`-70 - 150.00 T� —' 20 EA Street Trees 75.00 i.buu ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 11 065 SUB TOTAL 237 259 "RESTORATION /DELINEATION CASH 11000 -- CONTINGENCY COSTS - Z3i7Z6- DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (100 %) Z61'010 - 140 MEMTATION SURETY (CASH) 1,250 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (50X) T76.Sb�- a *Pursuant to City of Rancho Cocaaonga Municipal Code, Title I, Chapter 1.08, adopting San Bernardino Co, -nty Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash restoration /del ineatlon• deposit shall be wade prior to issuance of an Engineering Construction Permit. . _ Revised 3/84 SUBOIYISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL. "WRRIENTS) city Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucaronga, California 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of Tract 13062 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor on or before September 1987, as specified in the Engineer's or Surveyor's Certificate and agrees to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of $1,250 (Receipt No. 5 y, as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will be set and the notes furnished as above provided on or before'the date specified and that the engineer or survewr will be paid by the undersigned. It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the Line specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requirements or cause them to be comrleted and the cost thereof is to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed in Section 66497 of the Govermnent Code, tue City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days after receiving writter statement from the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements. Cordially, _Llwrr,v cgnepgmv rnwpaNV m r T Subdivider 16152 Beach Blvd., Ste. 140 East Address Huntington Beach. CA 92647 Date The deposlter of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall _ be 16152 Beach Blvd., Ste 140 East 'k LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. INC. Huntln ton Beach CA 92647 (Nam) ress IDTE: TD BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED IN TRIPLICATE 70 t r , RESOLUTION NO. Q(� — '3Sb' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, FII IMPPOVEMT SECURITY, AND FILIAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13062 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13062, consisting of 1 lot, submitted by Lincoln Property Conpany, M.C. Incorporated, Subdivider, , located north of 19th Street, between Aip-lhyst and Archibald Avenues, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamnga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the SuLt vislon Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to nett they requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith fo- approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use tha streets delineated thereto. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the C,ty Council of the City of R..rcho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be oral the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk 1s authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Tmprtvemen *_ Security 1s accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map i, delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is tuti�orized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of S.;d City. 7l i .v l •o Mrh . \C .� f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r%3o„ Af STAFF REPORTrV6 DATE: December 17, 1986 O 0 TO: City Council and City Manager 1a.7 FROM: Rathindra (Shintu) Bose, Senior Civil Engineer Bf: Judy A. Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract No. 13191 located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street submitted by Lewis Homes RECOM6IDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 13191, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. INAIYSIS /BACKGROUND Tract No. 13191 was Approved by the Planning Cc mission on May 28, 1986, for the division of 8.40 acres into 80 tots in the Medium Residential Development District locat_d on the northwest corner of Terra vista Parkway and Church Street. The Developer, Lewis Homes, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $238,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $119,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerks's Office. Letters of approval have been received iron the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water Oistrict. C.C.dR.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. Respectfully es sub.ni tied, X/ ;.4 G p RSB:JAA:cg Attachments 7�- i \ / ! ( • � 7 \ j , ( � ! � . .\ � \ � � ) ' / r \ �2 \ 4 a ■ / § , ( o> y � @ 7a .t c c i. CITY OF RANCHO Cl1CAMMW IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR S%ACf NO. 13191 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cu, :amonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Western Properties hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITMESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract 13191; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requ'renents to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at 7eveloper's expense all improvements described an Page 6 hereof within twelve months from the effective date hereof 2. This agreement shall be effective on the data of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to the City in wittin: ,,,t less than 30 days before the expiration date heraof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of tine. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to squire adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful mans, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. 5. The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said development in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the ' Cucamonga County Water District. Y,p 1156 H. Mountain' P.O. Box 670 crt.ly, Upland, CA 91766 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or' removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7 Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan rpproved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements t.ry tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the icprovement plans listed thereon by number. other incidentalalwo ral thestractfbounda 1 sctasnneededyfornafetysand groper surface drainage. Errors or omiaissicns discovered during constructin shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement ant' secured by the surety covering the original planned works. S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the' Developer "rom the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to prooar notification of Public utilities and City Departments. Failure to compTr with this section shall be subject to the penalties provld ^d therefor. other debrisOfro mppubliclrlghtseof- waybwithin roe a djoiningllsaidsdevelopnent resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Work done within existing streets shall be Diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all wok in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to reviver all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedication of the streets and easements in said subidivision, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said City Council, give good aM1d adequate warning f^ the traveling public o' each and every dangerous condition existent in said ,_rent or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the completion of all improvements, horein incorporated or, Page 7, to be Performed, each of said streets not acctgted as improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a terporary street closure Permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to orotect the Public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. Developer after �others iprovrementowo planted bcleanup. hasybeen completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Coamunity Development Director. a The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the and of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later. 13. The Developer is responsible for meeting all conditions estdbllshed by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed thereunder until the irprovement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided hereinwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provioed and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the inprovement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3 A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the 4ind approved for securing deposits of public monies. B. To secure laborers and rreterialmen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.2. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whnse certificate appears upon the Final Map for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment ii full; or, If no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Band Estimate contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proc+dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. v 3 .r„ 11 r ;r 15. The Developer warrants that the improvements described in this agr• went shall be free from defects in mater!als and workmanship. Any and al, portions of the impruv�aments found to be defective within or.e (1) year folloring the date an ►hick the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a stun equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or $200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Develeper's cbligations as described in this paragraph, lne maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has bean accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take cut and maintain such public liability W property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as additonal Insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's liability Insurance providing bodily iniury or death liability limits of nr,t less than $500,OD0 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less •han $250,OtA for each accident or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $500,000 for claiau which may arise from the operations of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, mnd property damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $500,000 which may arise from the operations of the Developer or his Contractor in performing the Bork provided for herein. y..: " 4 7 r J, - 18. That beforej'_7',execution:of Ws agreeimmt,,the Deybloper�-sidlh e with the City &+ certificate -or' certificates of insurance --c rir the-. specified ,insurance' ,Each •such certificate shall �bear, an 0 'It s precluding the cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any policy�evideinces`,. y such certificate, before the expiration of thirty (30) days,after the Cty:: 3A shall have received notification by registered mall fma the insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the orovisions contained h,,rein, and of intent to comply with saw, the 'Subdivider has subaitted Ate ,following described toproveitient security, and hasaffixed his signature her.-to: 1 X85, n , FAIINFUL P[Rf0N1AliCE Type: Principal Mount: $233,000 R , ?" Name and address of surety: = ;%7ENIAL no VIOR PAYMT ` Type: Principal Mount: 5319,L0O Rama and address of surety: f " `v C" DEPOSIT NOINR IATTON TYPs: Pr1nc1Da1 Mount: S 4,900 i Nam and address of turetye F TO RE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTW- it 'iilE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties here0o we caused these presents to be duly executed aM acknowled ed with all r„rtllfties required by law on the dates set forth opposite the si� natures OPERTIES, a general par tner ?hip Date 1.�2 - f(<_. by _ Developer gnaru s or zed Agent nd Daze by Devnloper Signature 4 r Printwd " Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, a eunicipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City CIO Approved: City Attorrgy .. DEYEiomes siolATINIE !KIST BE NOTARIZED IN TRIPLICATE AND CWLETEO yy Ap a , : 4F u ■v a For Ioprovenent: Date: Novert,er File refTenee: - CITY OF PAICHO'CUCA1 MCA DKINEEMDNG DIVISION r7NL11OACIMT KINIT FEE SCHEDULE _ city urawtrg no. NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing parmit or pavaavr dayostts QUANTITY WIT ITEM PRICE ANOINT 952 L.F. P.C.C. curb - 8" C.F. 480 gutter 8.50 8 092.00 �'19ii- L.F. P.C.C. curb - 60 C.F. 240 gutter 5.50 X35- L.F. P.C.C. curb only 8" 50 459a.00 T .' 3M S.F. '�SS2 4• P.C.C. sidewalk 1.75 73 28:00 S.F. Drive approach 2.50 i3`905Zfd S.F. 8• P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc. curb) 3.40 X00 C.Y. Street excavation 1.50 �b9T'00 72''0]0 S.F. -72' Preparation of subgrade 0.15 ilT`931� qr S.F. Crushed agg, base (per huh thick) 4" ` 0.03 - 8./44.00 i'-4 rr TON A.C. (over 1300 tons) 27.00 '12989M �ZT EA. Adjust sewer manhole to grade 250.00 �`25�00 5- EA. Adjust water valves to grade 75.00 `d50.06 EA. Street light, 1000.00 -20 t1l1�Od S.F. Removal o} q,C. pavement 0.35 42.00 EA. Street signs 200.00 - I- 86Q:0'd -2IC - !.F. - -2_ 3• RCP (2000 0) 29.00 -b' 9u.0O EA. Catch basin W " 8' (10' to15') 29D9.00 �Si'd10 _ -T EA. Catch basin N " 22' �21'r 4500.00 �`5t1�00 -� EA. -T" Local depression 12' 10 •o 2i') 1000.00 X00 EA. Junction EA. -'T P,tlet struc�ture,�Std #506 1500.00 - 3'OD�dO EA. ..anction strLcture pipe to pipe 1000.00 Z`0�00 �I EA. Street tries 100.00 �! i00.U0 X433- S.F. = 90F Landscapingy L irrigatiun 2.75 - id�131�6iI EA. 3• X 12 1/2" rectangular C.I. 100.00 -2'60Q b0 pipe drains ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 10 145 SUB TOTAL $215 689.00 ` *RESTORATION /DELINEATION CASH 1!000- CONTINGENCY COSTS - 2Ir5b9:06 G LEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (100%) 738tiRiD:60 NIINUMEMTATION SURETY (CASH) 4.900 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (50%) iT9'.'000:00 *Pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title I, Chapter 1.06, adopting San ^anardino County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a ash restoration /dollneatlon daposlt shall :ode prior to issuance of an Errgilneering Construction Permit. Rev l se.1 3/84 :Y •� *ru* w v SUWIYISION gLV"TEE NO PERFC06NCE (SETTING OF FDM 'IMMMTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga F. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentleman: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Co de. the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final nap of Tract No. 13191 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor on or before January 1988, as •pecifiad in the Engineer's or Surveyor's the notes engineering requirements specifiediIn Section 66497,tofrthe GovernmmenteCode. all The undersigned hands you'herewith the sum of S 4,900 (Receipt No. as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will a se and the notes the engineer furnished as be paid ate specified and that paid by the undersigned. It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga ompletd and theocostdthereoff complete beta cause- them to deposit, and city of Rancho deposit t Cucamonga the cedit authorized to the transfer It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed In s the ash Section 6 the deDGoit rheretnCoode. the City shall pay to said engineer or If the cost of complet'ug said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Spec tlfyiny the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements. Coroiall WE TFR Ppq?PERTiES. a general partnership 1 ''JJV5 Authorized Aacnt Subdivider P. 0. Box 610 Upland CA 917BS Address Date / :? 4 W, The depnsiter of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be WESTERN PROPERTI P. z D e ress NOTE: To 8E SUM1I'TTED FJLLY FILLED OUT AND SICKED IN TRIPLICATE M � d RESOLUTION 140. A RESOLUTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAM.IFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13191 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13191, consisting of 80 lots, submitted by Lewis Homes, Subdivider, located at the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street has been submitted to the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as prrrvided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meat the requirements established a: Prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Imprwiement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the sane is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest tharato; eno 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3 -That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be Approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City !=A 5 1 i ft DATE: TO: FhOM: )OBJECT: CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT � c 0 8 z r,ecevber 17. 1986 > r� Mayer and Members of City Ccuncil Barrye'P.. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Modification of Unit Mount for Telephone Lines foe FEES In -Lies of Undergrounding !ECONEIIDMTIOM Staff recommends approval of the resolution amending the unit amount used to calculate fees in -lieu of undergruunding existing overhead telephone lines. DISCUSSION on attached) establishing unit,aroyyuntsotpc° be LeGulnocalculating fees in- based upon information providednby tin various overhead iutility companies. ware Staff has since received a'letter from the General Telephone Company (copy attached) indicating that the average cost of undergrunding existing overhead telephone lines i- .highim than previously indicated. Therefore, staff recommi!sC.' that the previ usly adopted fat be Increased linearinfoot. The unit -mount for alectricat and cable televJsionOwill remain as ism $100.00 and $10.00 per linear foot respectively. Respectfully submitted, l3u�jlc�P, �vu�s'v Darrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:cg Attachments Y Y. GTE a General Telephono Company of California 9000 Hellman Avenue Rancho Cucacoaga, Ca, 1 91730 October 10, 1986 m aeon Repel -0 36800 -001 , Hr. Lloyd D. Dobbs City of Rancho Cuceaoaga 9320 Bueline Road, Ste. "C" i y A Rancho Cucraozyu, Ca. 91730 • ✓ OCT t 6� X986 Suljecu Revised Undergrornding Costs :ITY of 2ANCW CUFAgr;n Ral'trencu D.G. Rolasn'e letter dated 11 -20-85 EKWFCRI4q 0N'"'. Jecr Sir, Because of inareaatd labor /asterial costs and a study of current undergrounding jobs in progress, I as providing a revised estimate of our average per foot costs for unlergrounding telephone facilities. our revised estimate of undargrounding costs it $75.00 pav foot which includes both conduit and cable relocation costs. 1, Ploase be advised that all fees and negotiations are conducted only between the developer /weer and Cenral Telephone. We tire not authorising the city to act in oar behalf or'cclltct feu for the General Telephone Company. Being a Public Utility a= governed by rules established by the Califoroie Public Utilities Comlesion, there are some types of work which we art allowed to _ bill for, and some we do not charge for. If I am be of further assistance or you have any quastioas, please do not hesitate to call = at (714)945 -3571. N�/ 1 etwork Eng string Administrator - Facilities A Oaf of GTE C W ootaboa y au a 1. i•,': •r. ,. a 9 f IOLLTII19 I0. 16 -187 A 2314LITIC, AT INS CITY COUNCIL w ttt cm ff WClo WCA.INOA. CALl10UNn. WTAIL11129 Ttt1 9 L[W 4 CAOle0Att1npt0 0116Sw ITaiTT LIN19 WAIN IWIIN AT Mada OO communes AI.WIfAs � t WgIW. Ht /lw/y Cwlas /w W city Caeer11 of the City H ' 4egt Carry[ With" tv NfuFtho nrwrl K rrellh NT ttt lily ryarhaw Ir /1181 Ilea le elver a Praeab •eon ieetastb W 4rtrYL wA/,y W at,ly mlrF�Mt whale too Clap IN eetabllah oa[41M . the 41T Cassell ewyaAah that is is ooeaaoau to thd wan dot HlwelnNtwr�i Myo eert W n waowlbb oNhgo.wol/y I. W16t41, the Clq Cooull n0 nusi [ thu I, cartel, t,,,a. is to tw.wttnt to ty Co 4.810 httto gtyr/u e tillttu rN that 1e arb toot. faw to Jim of el dam. n ea4y...a1 ..hot l[au for utoal cow trottlas. I Waq,wNly hrasld WIN• Tt161UNI. N IT 8164119. y the Cltf Cowll N the Clq of 4uas CnaoyI. lift of to thrb where the nasty Cew/trlw rMHro .goon of fof A I1w H ulagttwties# [br, • fee Abell be ere F44rbto cor Ladoo of 14 follryly. I. Atutrlul Is", - flap "I issue feet. I. Talallooe U." - sm Ier Jidda, fast. I. Cable T.Y.. 110 yet 11eru Cwt. The fas ar411 anal N. Wryota total o B w Mead, foot H tub otlll y acny/W the misty Colas. i Iuf m• ATIIWC, W 401119 this Tilt day of ttq. 1116. 1TSls rebut. I/y. bass. Wright .oat Ode "lot, Ribald Amt -t � ° w. r • tee."' ythe, i�, cleft 1. 1. 1 TIALT A. ADTAtR. CITT fight, of oho City of We4 Caaooye. CallfereA, ee throat acetify the, [be faced led 24161991 s wee 4811 pad W, a.otryN, dN adwtN y the City Coattail of the Ct.y at NueN 4fdwge, 4llfhnl4. of d polar wally of said City 0areoil held ee [!e list act of ^ hay. 19%. ei KZ yyy.Ta•, e " �� r - V, -I � 11'; loollutte. go. 44-143 ?ago I M61%? " A-th'Itt- C117 C161k 86 '+r Y 1, r 9 r% a .l : RESOLUTIM NO. 96 -143 -A A RESOLUTION OF THE MY COUNCIL OF 114E CITY OF RANM CUMMM, AHENO:hi RE4�OLUTION H0. 86 -143 ESTABLISHING FEES IN -LIEU .F UNDERGP.OUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES WHEN REQUIRE) E'/ PLIVINING COA1tISSION APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City is in receipt of im6m;tion from the General Telephone Company indicating that tha average cost of undergrouading telephone tines is higher tian previou3ly indicated. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolvad, by tine City Council of the City of Rancho CucammnVa, California that the wit awuat to be charged for fees in -lieu of uodergrounding existing overhead telephye lines shall be $75.00 per linear foot W 6°'Ck ° :i}i�iW.w.'� :�:n� f'.'k �'. ; � "j.i- •,"'r +`,'S- . :+.,�`.� .d :T r, CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT if B DATE: December 17, 1986 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FRCM: Blare N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer OY: Richard Cot&, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of 'Permit to Construct a 24' Storm Drain within a 30' Steel Casing' from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company for the Archibald avenue Railroad Crossing (90. BBC- 522.90) Widening North of Base Line Road RECOIfEIMTI0M: It is hereby reccamended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution appproving and accepting the Southern Pacific- Transportation Company's rmit which grants to the City the right to construct, rtconstruct; amintain and operate a twenty -four (24) Inch storm drain within a thirty (30) inch steel casing across and beneath said Comp &ny's Archibald Avenue Railroad Crossing; and authorizes the Mayor to execute the same, and directs the City Cicrk to acknowledge the Mayor's signature and to attach a certified copy of saie Resolution to the duplicate counterparts of said Permit and to mail the 'original" count(rpart to said Company along with a check for three hundred ninety -five ($395.00) dollars for permit fees to be funded from Systems Development. ANALYSIS, Attached are two copies (SPTCO original and Licensee copy) of the above subject Permit from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company for the City's execution thereof. The Permit authorizes the City to construct and maintain said ,drainage facilities as part of the proposed Archibald Avenue Widening improvements at the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's Railroad Crossing (No. BBO- 522.90) North of Base Line Road. l jRespectfully �:ubmlttM� BWF:RRC:ko j. Attachments 7,? ..4 6 Via. Soi+t�rn r _ POCMC ` TnaoporbuVon C G"Pany m 110 rOUr" W/M eraltT. Ufa ANalLte. CAUioMM1A s00N City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Basolins Road Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Attentions Richard Cota Contlauont , LS - Alta Loma MP BBO 522.9 -X November 25. 1986` RECEIVED NOV 26 086 WIT R a7M MS CIP AMCMG UIG MIMA C ArA M ` Cet10Nd are dplirate counterparts of as Laiaatort W pel�it the earstrvo+ tied, riutsume, sad operation of 24" storm drain within a 30" ate,/ caning If satisfactory, please boe iota copies aoweuted and return tbo canter pert iI� idicated !Pico. "Original" to this ePliso far farther bendliag. please Note that signatures of the officials executing tha ,deeusNt an to be selmovladged dd a eertlfiad copy of the Awlation, passed 17 W goseraing body, owthcrisisg o>awtioa and actoptoaca of ow, sbould M ettetiwd to each cousterpsrt. With retard of our oapy of the fadentsrn, please radt to check ands oat Southern Pacific Vrodamtation Compaq to the amt of 5395.0 tot to the censideratien fsa. your attention to directed to Section III of the ladentora sbrsim it apb12166 that if a Contractor is lot to do tiro work it Will be nauscary fat this office to furnish him with Cur ataa4r4 light of 1xtr7 Agraenent. lhorefere, en this oetum of our roentstpart, please AM" the now and address of your contractor. Shou14 this indenture be plated of ratord, ua 10916 aypraofsto receiving the recording data for our rwArds. 629 +6013. Any farther quosticna is this regard, please on contact the Undersigned on (213) reclean. Tours truly, alcam.c� oacnncn.� -� i "COROINO RCOUtlTCO JIV I e .W O WH" RICOROlOI 11 TO DO., . AOC�u gut. I VACI ARO V[ TNU IINI FOR RLCOR"V.V Vll AELMISS BBO- 522.9 -y.( ) TRIS INDENTURE, made this y'' fty of ate. Nbe✓ , 1985, by and, between SOUTHERN PACIPIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Ddlawara corporation, herein termed "Railroad," and CITY OP RANCHO C[t CAMONGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California, address 9320 Baseline Road, f • I Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, heroin termed "Grantee "T WITNESSETHt r`. 1. Railroad hereby covenants and conditicni giants erein to the rightttotconstruct, recon- struct, uaintain and operate a twenty -four (24) inch storm drain within a thirty (3o) inch steel caning, hereinafter collectively referred to as Y' structure," in, upon, along, across and beneath the property and tracks Of Railroad, at or near Alta Loma tracks at (Rancho Cucamonga) , in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, crossing the center line of said shown on Engineer's Station 2099 +29, Mile Poet 522.9, in ' .a location I No. LADE -05,s print heet No. 1, datedsJulyt21 rn19861Pattachedgand auAoiagpart I•'• hereof. Said structure shall be'in9talled in accordance with minimum stand - ards of Porm C. S. 1741, also attached and made a part hereo° provided that nuch standards are not in conflict with nor less than those required by law. 1 -a. Ae a part consideration for the rights herein granted, Grantee shall pay to Railroad the sum of Three Hundred Ninety -Elva Dollars ($395). R LEASE AUGfT I No. -1- 96. April, 1985 2. Project markers in form and alas satisfactory to Railroad, Identifying the Lecility abd its owner, will be installed and constantly maintained by and at the expense of Grantee at nailtoad pro`:rty lines c: such locations as Railroad shall approve. Such mar -srs shall be relocated k- removed upon request of Railroad without •xpensa to Railroad. Absence of markerm does not constitute a warranty by Rallruad of no subsurface installations. 3. This grant is made subject and subordinate to the prior and continuing right and obligation of Railroad, its successors and aeaignsI to use elI the property described herein in the performance of Its duty es a common carrier, and there 1s reserved unto Railroad, its successors and assigns, the right (consistent with the rights herein granted) to construct, recon- `ruct, maintain and use existing n and future transportation, communication a p ndpipeline cfac illtiessand9 appurtenances in, upon, over, under, across and along said property. 4. This grant is made subject to all licenses, losses, esse- mentc, imstof title conditions, covenants, encumbrances, liens and claims of title which may affect Bald property and the word *grant as used heroin shall not be construed as a covenant against the existence of any thereof. 5. The rights herein granted to Grantee shall lapse and become void 11 the construction of said structure upon Bald property is not commenced within one (1) year from the date firer herein written. 6. Grantee shell boar the antirs teat and expense of construct- ing, rocnnstructing and maintaining said structure upon said said aidstr Grantee agrees a a o uctureshallbe duneatsuch timsno and rinn such nmanner me t not to interfere in any way whatsoever with the operations of Railroad. The plans for and the construction or reconstruction of said struc- ture shall be subject to the approval of Railroad. Railroad Grantee agrees to rwimburse Railroad for the cost end expense to f connectionwithntheiconstruction, reconstruction, maintenanceiand removal of Bald structure, including, but not limited to, the Installation and removal of such falsework and other protection beneath or along Railroad's tracks, and the furnishing of such watchmen, flagmen and inspectors an Railroad doema necessary. 7. In the event Railroad shall at any time so require, Grantee, at Grantee's expenso, shall reconstruct, alter, A{�i turn or otherwise improve said structure upon rocelpt of written notice from Railroad so to do. -2- 1?1 , 19ds 8. Granter shall, at its expenso, comply with all applicable lows, regalatlont, rule and ordure rogardleas of when they become or became effective, including, without limitation, those relating to noise water ha dairyquality: andi furnishaa atlafocto•y,avidancelof such and compliance upon request of Railroad. Should any discharge, leakage, spillage, emission or pollution of any typo occur upon or arlae from the premises covered hereunder as a result of Grantee's use, presence, operations or exercise of the rights granted hereunder, Grantee anall, at Its expanse, be obligated to clean all property affected thereby, whether owned or controlled by Railroad, or any third person, to the satisfaction of Railroad (insofar bu the property cvned or controlled by Railroad is concerned) and any governmental body having jurisdiction In the matter. Railroad may, at its option, clean Rallroad'a promises, 12 Railroad elects to do so, Grantee shall pay Railroad the cost of such cleanup promptly upon the receipt of a bill tnerefor. Grantee agrees to Investigate, release, indemnify and defend Railroad from and against all liability, cost and expense (including, without llmitatlon, any fines, penalties, judgmer.tr, end attorney fees) Incurred by Railroad ss a result of Grantee1ltigetion 's costs re uach of this section, or as a result of any such discharge, leak - ag", spillage, emission or pollution, regardless of whether such liahlllty, cost or expe,ise arises during the timo this Indenture Is in effect or thereafter, unless such liability, coat or expense is proximately caused solely and exclusively by the active negligence of Railroad, its officers, agents or employees. 9. As part conslderatlon, Grantee agrees to pay Railroad an amount equal to any and all assessments which may be levied by order whichymay lawful bydRailroad) toedefray an of Railroad (and or expanse Incurred in connection with the constructiontoffsaid east structure upon Bald property commenced within one (1) year from the date first herein written. 10. Grantee, its agents and employeaa subject to provisions hereof, shall have the privilege of entry on said property for the Purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaIni MY and making necessary repairs to said structure. Grantee •groom to give Railroad five (s) days' written notice prior to commancsment of any work on said structure, except emergency repairs, in which event Grantee shall notify Railroad'• authorized representative by phone. Grantee agrees to keep acid property and said structure in good and safe condition, free from we ate, so for as affected by Grantee's oper- ations, to the satisfaction of Railroad. if Grantee falls to -3- t, 85 fr d ee from waat*, then Railroad may uperform thednecessary work iatothe expense of Grantee, which expense Grantee agrees to pay to Railroad upon demand. Al. In the event any work upon or :n connection with Bald structure it its appurtenances, to be done upon or adjacent to the tracks and property of Railroad, should be lot to a contractor by Grantee, such work shall not be begun until such contractor shall have first entered into an agreement with Railroad, ratiefaatory to Railroad, and Indemnifying 6ai:road from and against el; claims, liability, cost and ex;i*nse growing out of the performance of the work to be done by such contractor. 12. Insofar as It lawfully may, Grantee agreea to inveatlgate, release, defend and indemnify Reilrcad, its officers, employees, agents, successors and assigns, frog all cltime. liability, coot and expense howsoever same may be caused, including reasonable attorney fees, for lose of or damagw to property and for injuries to or death Of persons arising out of tho construction, reconstruction, melnts- nance, preaanca, use or removal of Sala atruetuu, regardless of any garrai negligence or alleged negligence, ecti va, passive or otherwise, on the part of Railroad employees. The word •Railroad• as used in this section shall be construed to include, An rcdition to 4ailroad, the successors, assigns and affiliatrd cocpanioa of Railroad and any other railroad company that may be lawfully operating upon and over the t:racka crossing or adjacent to acid attucturs, and the officers and employee* thereof. 17. Should Grantee, its Successors or aasigne, at any time abandon the use of aetq p- operty, or any part tnereof, or fail at any time to use the some for the purpose conterplated herein for a continuoue period of one (1) year, the right hereby given shall cases to the extent of the use so abandoned or discontinued, and Railroad shall at once have the right, in addition to, but not in qualifica- tion of the rights herairabove renerved, to resume exclusive posaeasion of said property or the part thereof the use of which Is ar, discontinued or abandoned. Gpor termination of the rights and privileges hereby gran =ed, Grantee, at its own cost and expanse, agrees to remove said structure from said property and restore Bald property as nearly as practicable to the same state and Condition in wnirh it existed prior to the construction Of said etrucbine. Shonld Grantee in such aveot fail, neglect or refuse to remove -aid structure and restore said property, such recoval'and restoration may be performed by Railroad, at the expenae of Grentea, which expense Grantee agrees to pay to Railroad upon demand, or Railroad may, at its option, assume ownership o2 said atructure. -4- 93 Y 14. The parties intend that the promises and obligations of this indenture shall constitute covenants running with the land so as to bind and bill these respective successors still assigns. mrz o< o_Irofou I.4 rn.clfc• 11 a. B. taf ' faI of (j'J(Yv.oet� bhr. u. 1. lb I-1- a. 7 rr•na of FAItUmi I wi / Octal, Dlallc7 70R PPP• MII> t St. If —.1' ft.." to .. Calbraa. Iaroc.11l • lar fth. Iw Iro"d to .a o ♦ Dlunf light, , t 1 Y PUBUGILIFOONIA BLn ❑ u t1• tnia •/ N.clw Y',tbraefl, •.e, n.n to. 1 faa ^ •O County Of Ilaln balr.Mep� a�1♦ j/• /Ito. at• r .rlamca t• CI B � 4. /cratl.n Incr10r1 4 u1 that ..-1aa, Ue '0'I rRA / /C15C0 fOrIw.LM tt.1a• Irw• sf f• �Ieadc 61 /t.� I�r��� ass It a. c.n rl uwata, Ia•If If T ±s ee lar �4 I t• .a that ey <• my enll•n ...coca, IY YtiY(11D MSI[DP. 1 t.ry \-1 at of a/ [f 1. t). Ct' of CMnla,el0 wt of lass off ,/falls r [-1111, • If rot .t•rr�t•f I t1f haafc.. I... 1.fl is ,. Corporate. too day a.f Im b tRla fator hat[ 1. ..f Iv abs Clt1 uls Cwa♦ •9O Laaft Yl•. f• /tn. corny i, nYO. I m'. sea• Of e.walala -` Ry (T1t10) OW44l,� w,)ade Attost �"�,���,, r ✓� Assistant OcCretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, By Mayor Ry Cre-a -s- 9y p P i a :TTP P p r P r r rrPrr 2..r 1~zti� 11111 a gab.= �a 6 aid 011 11 9 i� �ca• T R 2I'M is 1 t '9 � 3 ` P IN 9 II I O i Y ggk 5' k y 0 a i filly a � t � J t J ; L i 1 411 F s _ f I •i I I is IEe d���{•r F ■' i M.'', th ;4 _ Li}ar! ci } 4 _ ,4tt ! ea ear; } N20 t =a � e i �o� g Fs@ `_•�. ��c. �•• ^ m _ J , a"3r a 0 4� F 4 v u� . c� �A 2j RESOLUTICW 90. O to A RE SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING IC PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A TWENTY -FOUR 124) INCH STORM MIN WIiHIN A THIRTY (30) INCH STEEL CASH BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND THE CITY OF .RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE ' RAILROAD CROSSING (NO. BBO- 522.90) WIDENING NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referral to as City'), has for its consideration a Permit for the construction of storm drain facilities as executed by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (hereinafter referred to as 'Company'), for the widening of Archibald Avenue at the Company's railroad. crossing (NO. 880- 522.90) located north of Base Line Road; and WHEREAS, the Company is willing and has executed said Permit authorizing the City to construct ono maintain a twenty -four (24) inch storm drain within a thirty (30) inch steel casing across and beneath said Company's railroad crossing; ark WHEREAS, as a part consideration for the rights granted by said Permit, the City shall pay to the Company the sum of three hundred ninety -five ($395.00) dollars, and WHEREAS, the City 1s willing to construct and maintain -aid storm drain facilities as a part of said proposed Archibald Avenue Widening Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Permit be hereby approved and accepted, and auti.irize the Mayor to execute the tare, and direct the City Clerk to acknowledge the'Mayor's signature, to attach a certified copy of this Resolution to the duplicate counterparts of said Permit and to ail tho 'original' counterpart to said Company along with a check for three hundred ninety -five ($395.00) dollars. s t ,9 0 r CPCY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1986 I Mn T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement for Predesign Aligno-mi; and Cost Comparative Study for the Turner - Hermosa Storm Drain with Williamson f Sciaid Consulting Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors for an amount of $18,900.00 to be funded from the Drainage Fund. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement for Predesign Alignment and cost Comparative Study for the Turner - Hermosa Store Drain with Williamson i Schmid Consulting Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors for an amount of $18,900.00 to be funded from the Drainage Fund. The Turner - Hermosa Storm Drain System has been in long -term planning for some time and is currently budgeted for design this ilscal year. It is noted that several alternative alignments exist following Turner Avenue to Foothill Boulevard or along Church Street. It is also noted that an existing 66' storm drain intersects the Turner Avenue Drain running easterly to the Church Street Storm Drain Basin. The Study proposed will evaluate three (3) alignments, 1) the traditional north /south alignment along Turner Avenue from Church Street south to Foothill, then east on Foothill to the Deer Creek Channel, 2) running east on Church Street to the Church Street Basin with a minor drain along Foothill Boulevard and 3) a combination drain using the existing 66' Church Street line and Church Street Basin as an overflow or diversion system to reduce the store drain size of the lines following either alignment. The design firm of Williamson d Schmid is recommended to perform the Study due to their current workings in preparation of the Master Plan of Drainage for the City. The intent of the Study will be to find the economic alignmenf' and to identify preliminary pipe sizing and design restraints. Respectfully su tted, " "WF:ko Attachments a PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AONEENENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , IS L_. between tlw City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as `CITY') and Williamson A Scheid Consulting Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT'). c A. Recitals. (1) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of Predes'gn Alignment and Cost Comparative Study for the Turmer- Hermosa Storm Drain (' Project' bereifter). ' (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services ne- essarf to render tdvice and assistaue to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perfore such professional services as hereinafter defined. NON. THEREFORE. it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSU.TAIR as follows: B. Agreement. 1.� Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the, following terms, except where the contest of this Agretment otherwise k "r requires: , 9' (a) project: The preparation of Predeslgn Aligment and Cost Comparative Study for the Turner- Nermsa Storm Orcin described in Exhibit "A" Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, kaps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. I - (b) Services: Such professional services as art necessary to be performed by COMSULTANT in order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of .all phases of tha project, including aror and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit "B" Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. COKSI0.TAKT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shalt forthwith undertake and cceplete the project in accordance with Exhibit 'A' and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shawl supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and dv-v mts (hereinafter collectively referred to as 'documents') including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A' to CITY within the time specified in Project Schedule, Exhibit li '8'. Copi" of the documents shall be in such numbers as ant required by Exhibit W. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONr1LTANT cow nts t regarding said decumentt and CONSUTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deimed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such four and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. • (c) COMSU.TXT shall, at CONSU.TANT's sale cost and e:.pense, secure and hire such other persons as my, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the term of this Agrewmnt. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that ulech persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retaiced by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maxlevam sum of 318,900.00 for the performance of the services regaired hareunaer. This sus shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct.and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'A'. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY to accordance with the igvoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such ,.' invoices shall be paid within z reasonable time after said Invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C' either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no it , I .3_ :: /e/ �10.1�19�U event, however, will said invoice% exceed 9511 of individual task totals described In Exhibits 'A'. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, togethnr with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment (lull be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit 'A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement bash to accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C ". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTM: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereto. (b) Photographically reproducrale copies of amps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to to project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from otlmr governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be CMULTANT's responsibility to make all Initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. _4. 16. - S. 0marship of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified material's shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT my. however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or auttorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be et the sole rink of the CITY. The CITY agraes to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses Including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse it another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement My be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written 'Notice of Termination' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior U the date of tarmf ration specified in said Notice. In the event Lids Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's appltcsble hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit '6', on a pro- rate basis with respect to the percanUge of the project completed as of the date of tansination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTAXT receive more than the maxiaum,spectfled in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, modals, photographs and reports, whethe- in draft or final form, prepared by I CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be aAdressed as set forth -in this paragraph 7. The below named Individuals. furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the perforsence by the parties under this Agreemmnt: glare N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and William P. Young, Project Manager for Consultant. Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mall, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight ( 48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shell neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all Insurance required hereunder In a camptny or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontra -t until all insurance raquired of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken oul full workers' compensation insurance for toll persons whom It my employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of Cali"ornia. -E- /d r� In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, ovary employer shall secure the sysent of rx •sstion to his employees. CONSULTANT phior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: 'I an aware of the pr.vtsions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake salt' insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement'. (b) Public I.rmoility and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at MNSULTANT's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT *11 keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, co.prehersive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claim and liabilities for personal injury, death., or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars (f1,000,000.DO) for bodily injury or death to ally one person or for any one csident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during tho life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ('malpractice') providing protection of at least $2!0,000.00 for errors and amissions (' wlpractice') with respect to loss arising frog actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible. i insurance companies licensed to do business to tbo State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as alditton:t Insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, ayloytes, and aaents. All policies shall contain I. Nguage, to the extent obtainable, tr the effect that (1) the InsOrar, insured and all subcontractors watvb the right of subrogatioa against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers employees, rnd agents; in the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance thet may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially charged except after thirty (30) days' ,wtice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish C",Y idth copies of all such policies promptly upon rceipt of them, or certificate evidencing ;tie insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indmificatien: CONSULTANT shall defend, in6 miify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agznts and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including tim payment. by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, In any manner arising out of any negligent _ intentional or willful acts or omissinns of the CONSULTANr in the perforsdree of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential dxages, to the maximum extent �Nmftted by law. 30. A7s1g sent: No assignment of this Agreem is or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be wade, either in whole or In part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that COISULTANT and its amplryers, officers and agents are independeat conttectors -8- ff under this Agreament and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed ry and construed in accordance with the iaws of the State of California. 13. Attorcev'c fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce 34Y term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party In said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorr,ryt' fees and costs from the opposing party, in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreeax:nt: This Agreement supers des any and ail other agrctments, either oral or in writing, between the parties with rosPect u the sub%ict matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by arty party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modiffeatlon of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. iW WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hiroto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: WILLIAMSON AND SCEMID CIVIL ENGINEERS CONSULT AK A LAED lSDR'.BYOR.S Date; December 3, 1986 i1 N ^c. CITY OF N8 Date: enn tau , , or ATTEST: every A. e , 1—ori Approved as to fora: Cliff rney .. I Kbl 1 Jai jQPC�tudd /�� October 31, 1936 Mr. Blane Frandsen City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 -C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Blwn t SUBJECT: HERMOSA AV °NUB STORM DRAIN; OUR JOB NO. 496299.10 Following up on recent discussions during our .neetIng of Oe:tebsr 20, 19% the purooss of this letter 1s to confirm and nmmorWize our agreement that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will retain Williamson and Schmid to provide certain civil engineering services concerning the Her-mom Avem.o Storm Drain. SpeCUIC&:ly, I understand then we are to perform the foWwing taskst 1. DrainageStudles. Hydrology EXHIBIT 'A° - Hydrology (3 alignments) $ 3,600.90 VV 1.100.00 - Utility Investigation /utility confgcts 2,000.00 - Alta Loma Bath analysis 1,300.L0 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND 311VE101S - Preliminary Rydraulles (3 alignments) October 31, 1936 Mr. Blane Frandsen City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 -C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Blwn t SUBJECT: HERMOSA AV °NUB STORM DRAIN; OUR JOB NO. 496299.10 Following up on recent discussions during our .neetIng of Oe:tebsr 20, 19% the purooss of this letter 1s to confirm and nmmorWize our agreement that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will retain Williamson and Schmid to provide certain civil engineering services concerning the Her-mom Avem.o Storm Drain. SpeCUIC&:ly, I understand then we are to perform the foWwing taskst 1. DrainageStudles. Hydrology a Study 3 alternate alignments - Hydrology (3 alignments) $ 3,600.90 - Field review of watershed 1.100.00 - Utility Investigation /utility confgcts 2,000.00 - Alta Loma Bath analysis 1,300.L0 - Church Street Basin analysis (2 alignments), 1,300.00 - Preliminary Rydraulles (3 alignments) 2,400.00 - Design report discussing aHgnmenta, conflicts/ relocations, costs, and potential construction problems o Optional - Preliminary design profiles (100 - scale) 1,300.00 2. MaetinS& Attend meetings with ^Sent, other design disciplines, and contractors, as required by proloct 2.000.00 TOTAL. $17,400.90 (with option) 13,900.00 9ased upon what you have told neat about the project, It is my best estimate that our fees and costa will not exceed $17,400 ($!3,500 with option). A. we have 1 discussed, these services will be provided on a time and material basis pursua,.t +' A Corporate OInG • :7752 6y Part, and. • kskrs, cankmts W14 . 714rty! = k :? (Nand [mplre OHIG 1o35 E Frenels 04 =ta. B • Cntado, Callfomla 91751 • 7 M7-4 4 t7 fiaa gego c«a,h OHIG • 5372.LvanWa Ictleln», Ota C • Grlsba4 Gllfomia xroos 51 W _ :�r, /d� 102 / / •/D ,t� sfl� t A y i t n. ti ®�1 Mr. Blom Franc-en Our Ton No. 36249.10 October 71, 1936 Page 2 to cur survlard hearty rate scheduls In effect at thu time the work Is performed !airtent copy erclased, p=lble revislaos lffeetive August 1), and u3Ject to cur standard Terms crd Ca dl,lcns wht:h are .n the reverse clde of this latter. By sieving the exiosed copy of this letter and retvming It to our office you acknowledge your acceptance of this propoml, which constitutes a contract for professional servkes. We will commence work only after rtcolpt of the executed copy of this proposr.L , Thank you for alving us the opportunity to be of service to ycu. Olruplacm Slncerely, ra fAce clr E=Iosuret Rate Sheet cc: FLiancLl AGREED AND ACCEPTED: CITY OF RANCPO CUCAMONGA BY DATE EXHIBIT 8 PROJECT SCHEDULE The preparation of the Pradesign Alignrnt and Cost Comparative Study shall be completed with sixty (60) days of the Notice to Proceed. H {..t� ,- 4X:4.; ��i -+- 4'-.� ..f • "� -' r.. ,, t; �cHtarr •c• - • -- � - - . CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LINO SURVEYORS STANDARD HOURLY RATES EffEL.-TWZ AUGUST 4, 1986 AUTHORIZED AODE, AL CHARGES COMPUTER PROCESSING TIME $23 /HOUR OVERTIME PRINCIPAL ENGINEER $100 $100 PROJECT MANAGER E6 -E6 PROTECT ENGINEER /PLANNER 72 72 ENGINEER /TECH 3 Si 49 ENGINEER /TECH 4 49 59 EAIGINEE•t /TECH 3 39 47 TECH 2 /WORO PROCESSING 30 37 TECH 1 /TRAINEE 2J 26 }MAN SURVEY CREW 162 196 2 -MAN SURVEY CREW 124 130 AODE, AL CHARGES COMPUTER PROCESSING TIME $23 /HOUR PLOTTER TIME $10 1MINUTE EXPERT WITNESS $100 /HOUR COURT nPPEARANCES /DEPOSITIONS $I80 /HOUR MESSENGER $30 /HOUR IN -HOUSE BLUEPRINTS AND XEROX AT COST v , OUTSIDE SERVICES AND BLUEPP.INTING AT COST PLUS 10 PERCENT Catporab Oflka • 177!2 94 Fark CIAd. hYlrta, g9toMa QS7H 7fYJH737Z y Int" Empire OfOU • f 0.'b E Fmcl9 St Sla. B • Ontatto, C2111=1la 91701 • 714WT4447 Ban Olapo CODnty Oifka • S•73 AYNIIda Enclnaa. Sta. C • CadatulL CailtOrela ff" • 61214364.Jt ;��_. i t JESOLUTI01 W0. (�� '��✓ w . n A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO r` CUC X", CALIFORNIA APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES , AGREEMENT FOR PREDESIGN ALIGNMENT AM. COST COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR THE TURNER- HERMOSK STORM' DRAIN WITH WILLIPYSON & SCHMID CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND .; fd1RVEYORS ' WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is desirous to determine the econceic alignment and point of connection for the Turner - Hermosa Sto,i Drain to the existing Deer Creek Chsnner°; and 9, WHEREAS, Williamson & Schmid Consulting Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors exhibit the professional capability and desire to perform a Predesign Alignment and Cost Comparative Study to makd recoexndition of an economic alignment V0 point of connection for the Turner - Hermosa Storm Drain to the Deer'Creek Chav el for a fee. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, to accept, approve and otherwise exeruta a sio Profesnal Services Agrtenent with Williamson••& Schmid Consulting Etvil Engirm rs for a Prcdesign Alignment and Cost Cam�rative" 'Study for the Turner - Hermosa Storm Drain for a fee not to exceed N.900.00 to' be paid free the Dralnagc Fund. a = I M, M, ov 1. .fit ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -%3CA �— STAFF icEPOBT t°r> �, DATE: December 17, 1986 UI Wrl TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Monte Frescher, Public Works Engineer BY: Cathy Bncker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOI OBA77OR The required street improvements for Trcct Mc. 12316 -1 (Baseline Road) have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, adept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 545,830.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond to the amount of $458,300.00. Analysis /Background Tract 12316 -1 (Baseline Road) - Located on Baseline Road and Valencia Avenue and Baseline Road and Spruce Avenue. DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 45,830.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $458,300.00 Respectfully submitted, MP:CB:cg Attachments MENNEN w� r as m< }r-��' Y J� r I: RECOROIKG REQUESTP BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF CC14PLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate Is: Tract 17316 -1 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Vaso Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 17th d.ty of December 1986 there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents fur: Tract 12316 -1 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Lewis Homes S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Tract 12316 -1 ° The street address of said property is NYA - t� a,, e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKONGA,.'a municipal corporation, Owner" au eugeau e+ ` Senior Civil Engineer ' RESOLUTION NO. SL -357 a' g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFCRNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12316 -1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 4 WHEREAS, the construction of public inprovenents for Tract 12316 -1 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and s WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEPEFORE, be it resolved, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the city Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. +a a, t Vo ; + .p;S4.1.%F'„�ys?i�'Sli �,� iP •. ++:ir ,.fi: + r.. - �^.�a`.1.ror %- / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cx" STAFF REPORT ,TV� 0 pp z U U > 1917 ` DATE: Decrmber 17, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Rathindra (Shintu) Bose, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Judy A. Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement for Parcel Map 9498 located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street, submitted by Reiter Rinker Gateway RECOIlti11DATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting Improvement Extension Agreement and Security for Parcel Map 9498 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Analysis /Background Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Parcel Map 9498 were approved by the City Council on December 18, 1985, in the following amounts. Haven Ave. Median Fourth St. Median. Faithful Performance Bond: $66,500.00 $50,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $3J,250.00 $25,000.UO The developer, Reiter Rinker Gateway, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said Improvement agreomr_nt. Copies of the Improvement Extension Agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, x7I1" JA:dlw Attachments 1 41. V1 / r, �m QQ stye v gl� I� • N ti aV�� c 4.v e�G4,Y4o0i r-.cee w;a• t VICINITY MAC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECT Parcel Hap 9498 TITLE: Vicinity Hap " /17 :7 I � . + • y u -^ r „ i� ICY Band K62,9168943 rr.mL.+•Rl.ln.aa FAITHFUL rERFORMCCE CORO- VMEREAS. the City Council of the City of tancho Cucamonga. State of California and IMRCR _rv-- a • area. -shtq (her Man y designated as pr nc pa - ve en ere 0 o an agrasaeat YMreayy�• 01,I9CIpA1 agrees tall and complete care Aln de'.1_A961 •pubIIC Improve.,, ..ICh said agreement. rw dated a • and Identified ea project -- _ is Tirmby referred to and made A part nerdor:ana, I WHEREAS• said principal it required under the terms of eat" agrament to furnish a bond for the frithfgl performance of said agreement. NOV, TNEREFORE, We the principal aa4tOTTOP[1lt IICLa.Inc'6 Nr!xNT as suety, are held and firmly bound unto the M, o7Tinc 0 Near •ga (heralnafter called •City). In the Pona) son Of X(K&Y sea than nd �..�_ Oo Elars W em u gong c , • e stet, or t r pf ?.vet e{ w •c snm Xeil sad truly to be node, we bind ourselves; our heir[, succe 1sors executors and , at.tntstratars, ,jointly and save,, ly. firmly by these presents Tee Condition of this obligation Is such that If the above bounded principal, his or Its heirs• aAecators, administrator%, succeesors or assign[, $hall to all things stand to and abide, by, aid Well ape truly keep and pert.,,• the cOvemants. Conditions and previsions In the said agreement -.�} Ad-ray altaratfoe theraef• made as therein provided, an his+ aA ttlr Dart•: to be kept and performed at tee time and In thr therein specified, and In alt respects acco,ding I _.t0e War, Intent and meaning, and shall Indemnify and Lave harila 430. Its officers, agents and employees, es thtreln [ttpultteo than this vellpstion shall become null and volt; otherwise, ;t steel be and remain In full 'force and affect As a Dart of the o0llgaticn secured hereby and In addition to the face mount specified therefor there shall be incl•ded costs cad reasonable expenses and fa[, , ncludlnq reasonable Attorney'[ hea, facurred by cur In successfully pnlorcln9 such obligation; .11 to b. taaid at costs ad ++cluda 1n any Judgment vend v en. The surety hertbr stipulates and agrees that no change, exit "Sion df t at. ateratton or adrillun to the tern of test aqreemeat or to the work to be performed thereunder or the %pact- _ f%cations Accompanying tho same %hail In anywise affect Its obllga.lom on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, eatension of Ume, alteration IT eddltion to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specification% IN VITMESS WHEREOF, this .nstr..,.t has been duly eAccuttd by the orinclpai and surety abort aged, on hk`,r n 1gSJ__. rnrzR 11 G pI�' era hoer ;rely) . - 3 �__:�ar�./ 7• � ,�—� M.A. M ere Ito rn ta- +- alt ,Carta C. hr1�r , .. (LEASE ATTACH S I R A GRATU %SHOST EOROTARIEEDII gOADS ' r r x Y I a "T1 real. i•' aC , Ir -n. i rN .1 • Ella OP Law OICAlou FACIPEERING JITIV011 OIrAOA'.791EAT ?MIT FEE SOIE07R,E For to"tuanit EF„ Silo 9rfrre,ce( .,u,e Clt) Orr +Irrif . JI/a aex,.+,a,na 111M Don Not teclude Current in far Writing Parrett Cur Pavaaae,t kPosits %L)tT1TT *RIT IffR PRICE YOUNT L.r. P.C.C. curb - 12' C.r 24• guttw 1.23 L.r P.C.C. Cure . Ir C.[. 24• gutttr 11.00 - - L.F.-- .n.14C.C. Curb an IF a -� S.so A.C. hem c,so S.F /• P.C.C. sldeualt 1.75 -� .P art" approach -� 5.F 8. F.C.L. (roes cutter (Inc. curb) 1.40 C.1. Street au,atim -� C.T. IvParted eabminent 1.50 ia S.F S.F. PrePP Alto of subgrade 400 0.15 ,m_» Crwhed 4911. hate A.• (Parvro.thlek) O.v1.12 s74 o•er 1500 two 27.00 TON A.C. B00 to 1100 tam) 75.00 -� FOR A.C. 500 to 900 toes) 45 OD ' 13--abla TON �9b $J. A.C. A.C. unew 500 tons 60,00 4d V") _ Fatch ) ; *.SUS A.C. ��• .i. S.F. 675 1• thick A.C. overlay 0.10 EA. Adjust tear tuWale to graft 250.00 EA. Adjust tawr Chan wt to gqrses 153.00 ' '- __ EA. Adjust Water raft" to grade 75.00 EA. Street lights 1000.011 - r _- L.r talcadcs (Intersec. SSOO Nin) 1.00 - -� fr _ L.I. 2 x a• recl000d header 1.15 e yj,g_ S.F. L.F. 11aoval of A.C. parse 1!•' �' r 075 Rnoval of P,C.C. curt '9- 1.10 - L.r, ROCRTPI Of A.C. tl,,W +! 1.00 EA. [at. Street signs •a`syt!: H01A - Reflectors and pQ&'G 44 15,00 L.F. roocrate block Will MOO � S.F. Retalnlrg Wall 20.00 TCA Aggregate bate 7.T0 C.T. Concrete structures 42S.OD - L.F, 1B- RCP 7003 P 25.01 L.F. 24' ACF 1500 0 15.00 L.P. Tr RCP 2071 O1 49.00 L.F. 44• ACP 1200 p MIND M EA. Catch basin Y . 41 2000.00 Ed. Catch basin R • G. 2900.00 EA. Catm basin Y . 221 4500.00 EA. local depression 4• 500.00 -' -- __ EA. Local depression 121 1000.00 EA. 0unctlon structure 5000.00 [A. putle• structure. Std ( /a)g ISC0,010 EA. Cutlet structure, Std /SU7 500.00 -� Gf Guard p real (wed) 13.00 7J0�� L.r Sawut 2.UD EA. ,700 Wadeail (ad- Wn91 4000.00 L.r. Ret cco made 75 gppp__ S.F. L.F. Ladscapinyy 11 Irr1gst1n 2.75 Roll curb (P.C.:.) 1,50 )1PP S.r 80aantte 5.OD 1 ENOINEERINO InSP[CTIoN ru .9//75 e) SUD TOTAL aN ••i'll •RESTORATION/ OELINEAT{al CASH ,F L�'L' CONTI%GEXCY COSTS IS96 A7n OEPOSIt (REFI7NPA11l[) FAITHFUL Par0NWa Basc (100%) e3- VAVXNfAT10R SURETY ({CASH) LABOR AXD KAT[RIAL WOeo (SO %) i�lSIT�'1 •Nrevsat to City of Rancho LYCAm"pnd4 IkaietPil Code, Title 1. Chapter 1.011, WnpHAS San Pernardloo Canty Code Titles, Chapter, 1.5, a ash restoration /Mllmation deposit, shell,• k .Cat Wlar to Issusaace of an Cnflnreryg Cmttructtm penit. a WSCA )(.A� •) ) 4 � Y IiY� �r � J1y�,1�a� a r. , �9 ..• rd; • , ImpEx tAgmt u", CITY OF RAK-dO CUCAI"" I19ROVMU EXTENSION AOREt3IEW FOR PARCEL MAP 9498 KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS: That /this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the, provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation by n bet r, t said City, ho:clnaftar referred to as the City, and' /_ referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an improvement agreement wilh the City as a requisite to issuance of buildings permits, and WHEREAS, sold Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the said Improvement agreement. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The completion date cf the terms of the said Improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period of 12 months from the date of City Council approval of said agreement. 2. Increase it) improvement securities to reflect current improvement costs shall be furnished by the developer with, this agreement and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 3. Tna required bond and that additional principal amounts thereof are at forth on the attached sheet. 4. All other terms and conditiont of the said improvement agreement shall remain the same. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the Developer has submitted the below described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: 3/17/86 f; �.1�y aea�e•a�araaaaaaaai FAITHFUL PERFORXAMCE BOND Description: Additional Principal Amount: 0 Surety: K, Address: MATERIAL AND LABOR GOAD Description: Additional Principal Amount: 0 Surety: Address: DISH DEmrr lexa RTATION Fm Additional Cash Deposit :, 0 +' INIRTEIYLRCE QJARANM BOND Principal Amount: .�� To be posted prior to acceptance of the project by the City, f' f1RHfHRRH ►RRkHR1RHRHMHIRHRHHH HRMYHIRHkHitfYRf,HHRNrf}RHR + fR f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' OEVELOPEP CALIFORNIA, a mnicipal corporation A.H. E V E LENT CO. By: Zeffrey King, Mayor Aug t Reiter, Attest: _T ' every u e e , y Clark a ;E s ' NOTE: FORM MUST BE CWLETED IN TRIPLICATE x R N& DEVELOPER'S SISAATURE ?I= BE ir7TARIZED 5 p_i�L1. r�Y.tt'� � 1!'r t4. �h��, \in fly •,.ZSY'{T�°h. RrCLUTiON N0. gip -3(o0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFONDIIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND !MP'ROVEMEiT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 9498 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, ha! for Its considaratioi an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on Decembor 1, 1986, by Reiter Rinker Gateway as developer, for the Improvement of public tight- of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said IWrovement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcel Map 9498; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVCD by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security ba and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign seia Improveme.it Extension Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. �.1 s _ I� � r i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: DBComber 17, 1956 To: City Cquncil and City Manager From: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Subject: Conceptual Plan for Terra Vista'a Third Neighborhood nark That City council review and approve the recc;=ondation of the Pa-.-k Devolcpmont Commission for acceptan :e of the conceptual design plan for the third neighborhood park to be developed in the Terra Vista Plan Community. The third park to be provided by the Terra Vista Park Implementation Agreement will be T.V. IV (Wost Greenway). The five (S) acre school adjacent neighborhood park (Exhibit A) was deallned as a way po nt along the approximate 1 1/2 mile major groenway trail system (Exhibit B). The Greenway, as provided in Terra Vista's Specific Plan, will ultimately bisect the community connecting the northeast to southwest portions of the development. The Greenway will include two separate trails with a six foot pedortiian walkway and a ten foot bicycle trail. Radiating from the Greenway, will be minor trailways that will tie together the entire proposed park system within Terra Vista. The T.V. IV Park Site will afford access only by way of pedestrian and bicycle transportation. Consequently, thu features of the Park center around passive activities such as picnic areas, open space, a trail rest area with restrooms, and kloak interpretive center featuring information: on various tree species planted along the groenway trail. Additional smenitios, inc..ude multi leval childrand play area and hard court surface. The plan was pres:nted to the Park Devnlopment Commission at tb — egular November meeting. The plan was approved by the * im_ on with the stipulation that emergency vehicle access e d e provided. The plan will allow access from the cul- d -a,- to the north and will be provided. /a3 6` rt ,i l" r. Additionally, staff has boon working with Lewin Homes, central School District and their designated consultants and the residential /inatitutional committee of the City's Planning Comm'ision to afford's design consistent with the cities General Plan and Terra Vista0a Speoific Plan. Thu design shown in Exhibit "A" complies with the documents. Oit 1�4 e r a M, 71 M7 1 n � rli1 1 -- ....)rte •l__. �o 2! J .G III I r I 12 HAp ^• L� il god I� n) Ir-� d5 a N nu n � rli1 1 -- ....)rte •l__. �o 2! J .G III I Exhibit B" �i IM re-1 V1 tl Aattr 4V=; --5'9 C3 71 r9 G`7 I 12 HAp ^• L� il I� n) Ir-� d5 � ' u �a Exhibit B" �i IM re-1 V1 tl Aattr 4V=; --5'9 C3 71 r9 G`7 p _ ~' �if•��� LLB IN .� � �'� ^�l' � 1 -•. _-= tea` -=. Ezl•ibit A r, i t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager �/�� FROM: Nark K. Lorimer, Administrative Analyst W1— SUBJECT: CITY LINK WRTWO19 111CONK0 0T1011 ^ -7 MWA 1, a. m sa It is recommended that the City Council approve subscription to the league of California Cities City Link Network and authorise fvndo in the amount of 92,000 for fiscal year 1986 -87. 4 -TTT-- - The League of California Cities has introduced its an telecommunications network, CITY LINK, which receives final approval from the Leaguo'a Board of Directors in July. She League hem contracted with Capital Information Management to provide services, training and technical support for the CITY LINK system. CITT LINK is a telecommunications mehork, data base and electronic mail oyster designed exclusively for California cities. With the City's existing persorrl computers and telephones, CITY LINK could provide instant legislative and League information, as well as direct Cirq- to-City electronic communication. The CITY LINK network is fulljr serviced by Capital Information Management from their northern California offices. CITY LINK'S data is monitored and maintained by the Sacramento office of the League to insure Information is timely and useful to City officials. Specifically, CITY LINK would provide the following important aervicest 1. The City could analyse the provisions of the legislative bill instantly without waiting several days for it to arrive by mail. T. The City could receive the League's Legislative Bulletin the sae day ■o prepared, allowing for more time to react to items of concern. 7. The City could learn more about crucial legislative hearings faster, allwlog for more time to contact legislators and convey tho City's position. :j +i dity Link Network December 17, 1966 Page 2 4. The City would receive daily or weekly status report, and hearing schedules of all bills. S. The City could obtain the status of soy bill including last action and currant location in the Senate or 4ssmblr Coolttess. 6. The City could obtain iafoaation on voting records by bill or legislator. 7. The City could track campaign contrih-tions by cattributor or recipient. B. yhe City weld obtain the full text of say bill including moot recent emeniaents. a. 9. CITY LINK'S Email would slim communication directly with other cities and the League and would provide capability to transmit nessales, =swam and dacuaents instantly. .,, 10. The Email system would offer League membership Information including training and conference information, division and department sobustworks. City Attorney cervices and League research information. 11. CITT LINK would also provide an option of assessing the LINU8,LOCIN ' system with which to communicate with the National League of Cities and the International City Nensgsment Association, mahieg it easier and quicker to stay abreast of natioa,l issues. Additionally, CITY LINK could allow aocess to the National Municipal Information Network (LOGIN) and to communicate with City officials across the Country. t. The City already has Appropriate computer equipment, modem and accessories aecaerary to access the CITY LINK system. °+pital Iofosmstion Management will install the CITY LINK services at a one time set -up roe of 0250. Monthly subscription to CITY LUK is eatimsted at 0200 per month for all ' services. With the City's cupstant concern for lttiaintive 41CCivlties. CITY LINK could provide for an excellent telecommunications, oetwort providing the means to address legislative matters note efficieutl) and eff,cti•rely. r should you have any questions or cooments regarding CITY LINE, plasma feel free to contact ma at your convenience. MBL/dja M' �> i�1^:: a' r ,�ii:'`+:::d'�;.�•'., "•ti:r ;;,.i A'�%r sJ I r I: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. MEMORANDUM a. .. DATE: December 17, 1986 TOt City Council FROM Herk R. Lorimar, Administrative Analyst SUBJECTt ANIHAL CONTROL COATRACT The County bas yet to subuit a roviaed contract and cost figure to the City for a modified service schedule allowing for an animal control nfflcer to be designated to Rancho Cucamonga seven days per week That contract will be presented to the City Council at its December 17, 1986 meeting /ml 1a9 1777 a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATES December 3, 1986 Tot City Council and City Manager TgOis Mark R. Lorimar, Administrative Aorlyat)&,A— gO03ECTs ANIMAL 92KY201 CORMAf,T MODIVICATTOMS ■ rial It is recommended that the City Council approve the atterhrd animal control Agresent With the County of Iasi Bernardino, and authorfse the Mayor to sign and execute tho contract Which modifies the existing level of service allowing for a full time Animal Control Officer doIigrated for the City at a cost of 026,300. no City Council authorised 030,000 isi the BY 19CS -E7 budget for increased stiml control services. The City of poncho Cucamonga has contracted With the County of Ban Bernardino to provide animal control services since the City's incorporation. With the tremendous growth and increasing population Within the community, staff requested the County to provide various options for increasing the level of service to meat those growth and population demands. The current level of animal control service provided to the City of gazebo Cucamonga includes all personnels equipment and supplies necessary to provide for animal control services. The County provides an equivalent of 1.75 full time animal control ofticers with which to patrol and respond to calls for service. Additioesl:y, the County rrov ides an Animal Licensing Checker to implement the dog lieensiet program. Services which are provided to the City includes 1. Enforcement of all county Orainsuces pertaining to animals and issuance of citations as necessary for violations of those Ordinances. Impounding all auieals caught at Urge. 3. Qunrantine all animals suspected to be rabid. 431 Animal Control Contract Modifications t Decmbe. 3, 1986 Page 2 4. Investigation of complaints of nuisance upon request during routine t patrol. 3. em07a1 of dead cnimals in the public right-of-way. 6. Investigation of reported dog bites. 7. Providing a dog liceusc Fragrant and conducting clinics for the vaccination of dogs. 8. Providing for the ret•e-.0 o: all licensed dogs whenever possible. 9. Conducting a hot.e -to -bonne camas vitbia the City for the purpose o! aatartaining the number of unlicensed dohs and to license such dogs during the actual canvas. Service Level Oetioos In response to the City's request, the County prcvided several options for modifying the level of service of animal controls ANIMAL CO-MOL 011VICK LIM 0171018 County Personnel total total Provided County cost rite CgAt service Coar. Option I On -call response in $105,400 $ 1,.%N $113,900 City 70 bra. per seek Option 2 full time officers $105,400 $26,300 $131,700 designated to City 90 bra. per week option 3 lull time officera $105,400 450,900 $156,300 designated to City 120 bra. per week Option 4 pall time officers $103,400 42,700 $188,100 designated to City 160 bra. per was), Notes " 1. All options above include twenty -four hour evergency service, enforcement of lava and Ordinances, pith -up of dead animals, implementation of computerized licensing program, implementation of educational programs to the public, door -to -door camasiag for rabies, vaccinations and licanses, and shelter services. t� s 2. County costs are paid by licensing feet, generated from the Count � implemented dog licensing programs . " At Animal Control Contact Modifies tionn } December 3, 1916 Page 3 Optic.] I attain Current Level of BeLr.Ic Maintain the current level of service to include an equivalent of 1.73 full time animal control officers to patrol the City coven days a week, eleven hours a day. Bervice would stao include twenty-tout boor emergency service enforcement of laws and Ordinances, pick -op of daaA animals, implementation of a computerized licensing system, iw'lewentatios of educatioeal programs to the public, door- to-door eameasles for ration vaccinstices and licenses, and sheltering services at the Ban Bernardino County AnLmal Bkeltes in Donors. The cost of this service would be $113,900, with a direct cost to the City of $8.500. The County would provide an equivalent of 2.25 full time saimal control officers which would patrol the City eons days a week, fourteen hours a day. Additional smites would include twenty -four hoar emergency service. enforcement of less mad Ordinances, pick -up of dead animals, Implementation of computerise•1 licnaalng system, imploneutation of educational progress to the public, dour -to -door "missing for rabies, vaccinations and ltceusin6, and sheltering sacviees at the Ban Bernardino County Actual Shelter in Devote. This service level option rould allow for the designation of at least one ani,tal control officer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (only) forty hours par week, Monday tbiougb Friday, from 83u0 a.m. to SOO p.m. This would allow for quicker response to service calls and for backer relations between the officer sad the City. Me cant for this service level option is $131,700, with a direct coat to the City of 026,300. 002 ion 3 - Greaear Iucrerpbin Level of Servire Thi County would provide an equivalent of 3.0 full rise animal control officers to patrol the City seven days a weLk, twenty -four boors a days l4rwlees would also iuelnde twenty -!our hour emergency service, enforcement of laws and Ordinances, pick -up o! dead animals, inylmentation of ca- y-aterized licensing system, implementation of odacattonal pro;rms to the public, door -tu -doer "ceasing for ration, vaeninatious and licenses, sad sheltering servie43 .t the San Bernardino County Animal Sbolter in Dsvore. This service level option would designate fro animal control officers to the City (only) forty hours per week each, Mondty through Friday, 8t00 a.m. to 5300 P.M. The cost far this service level option is $156,300, with a direct coat to the city of $50.900. a.YYY r • r t Animal Control Contract llndificetiens ,> December 3, 1986 Page 4 Option 4 - Creetest Tnr,ritave in level of SMice The County would provide an egpivalect of 4.9 full time animal control officers to patrol the City seven days a week, - twenty -Pour hours a day. Service would also include twouty -fcur boor emergru%7y services, enforcement of laws and Ordinances, pick-,up of dead animals, implementation 9! computerized licensing syatrm, implementation of educational programs to the public, door - to-door canvasing for rabies, vaccinations and licenses, and sheltering services et the Sam Bernardino County Animal Shelter in Davore. This service level option would designate two animal control officers to the City fifty -six hours per week, each day 5:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The cost for tbir service level option is 8188.100, with a direct cost to the City of 882.700. Summary With the increased service levels in recent years, is is staff's recomseadation that the City Council increase the level of animal control services provided to the community. With the Co ®t7 respo=dimg to over 15,000 animal control calls per year, torrent service levels do not appear adequate and will not continue to be •atisi ... ny to meet rha needs of gaucho Cocamongs. Staff recommends service level vrzion I2 in order to provide a foil time animal control officer designated within the City of Rancho Cucamonga oily. 'laic service level would allow for acme efficiant response to citizen requests fuv service and would pruvfAe a my a cooperative working relatiumahip between County personnel and Cis mt.•e Since the animal control contract does not bone a termination date, ! v•.ld be appropriate to approve option /2 and allow sufficient time to eve. a that service level in effectively nesting the needs of the community. A great,, it :tease in the level of service could be considered in the future in the evev a current levels were cot satisfactory. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. MIL /dje /3 y y f� R u ,R \l {t a. . n` w; t, i i; 1+ . — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager /�/���% FROM: Mark R. Lorimer, Administrative Anslyst) /6 SUBJECT: ,iMIMAi. COWL CORTRACT Attached is a copy of the animal control routratt With the County of San Bernardino. A revision to tho contract is currently bt ag :mpleted and vill be made available to the City Council on Monday, Dectmber 1, 1985. ImL /dja Atta:bed ry i� _;F COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD CONTRACT Y FOR COUNTY USE ONLf GYnn O.OVMMI COnItKI MYmJ,r _ PUBLIC HEALTH COUnI'/GMrITMIGMVY111KnKnVIM G1rYK1•I'I LIf.nM NYw�•eIi Michael Welsh . ,387 -62 2 •Wwt Vnit NS. SueOCIKI N•, vuM IM, IM N., wrMUnt el CynYK1 611 001 ImrKI NMNi 1 f6nVKt KTK.1 MWONr11,nt OlIKVGIr ,K1N•,w IM I•IylNryt /•rmnn eKYnKN .a,,..IT.I. wlnK,nl a..Nr THIS CONTRACT is entered Into in the State of California by and termen the County of Sea Bernardino, hereafter called the County, and N. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA hereafter called City I'M Baseline Rancho Cacamonla, CA 91730 noon. e.nN oen 1,M1010 N. N e %IYI aYNYn NO. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (Uw 4uxe plow and dd7dcnO bond rhMM Set ford, mrrM ro bo avderrd, mount to bt pdd, mrurerofprment r Fr Pon pjnb w w Gnmpletlon, deemlfnadw of radd ctW perfa mma, aid nun fw onnMdw. other erm,r rd candltlonr, and etbd,P/nr, rprrllkstlont and ddvnds,,fury.! WHEREAS, the City is dosirous of contractLng with the County for the performance of specified service by County officers and employees, snd WHEREAS, Article I, Chapter 1, PArt 2, Division 1, Title 5, of the Government Code authorizes the County to asourae certain City functions, and WHEREAS, County Code Section 16.0213A(b) remains in full force and effect as a City ordinance, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWSt 1 County shall provide through its Public Health Department, or such other agency as the Board of Supervisors may designate, animal control services normally provided by the Department to the unincorporated area of the county. Such services may in- clude, but not be limited to, those services and functions performed undor Chapters 1 and 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the County Code. 2 The County hereby agrees to provide the following specific functions: a. Enforce all County ordinances pertaining to animals, including the issuing of citations as necessary for violations of said ordinances. b Impound all animals caught at large, including cater, and provide a for the return of all licensed dogs whenever possible. C •a 1/eC a.•.... N. ' c. Quarantine as prescribed by law all animals suspected to be rabid. ' d. Investigate eomplalnts•of nuisance by animals upon request during routine patrol. a. Remove dead animals on the public right -of -way. f. Investigate reported dog bites. g. Provide a program whereby dog licenses may be issued by mail; clinics and during house-to-house canvassing; and send rer ✓al notices by mail to owners of currently licensed dogs together with an application for renewal. s h. Conduct clinics for the vaccination of dogs. i. Develop a plan and conduct a houzo -to -house canvass within the City for the purpose of ascertaining the number of unlicensed dogs and to license such dogs during the actual canvass. The County shall give notice of the requirements of existing ordinances and laws with respact to the licens- ing of such dogs and the obligation of the owner($) or other responsible persons to apply for and obtain such licenses. A written citation will be issued at the time of canvass to any person required to purchase a dog license and who fails to purchase said license at the time of canvass. The County agrees during the canvassing period to attempt to make 1000 total canvassing coverage of the entire City area. Such service shall include the designation of one officer to operate within the limits of the City between 0800 hours and 1700 hours Monday through ?riday. j. Assign officers to provide an average of one hundred and twelve hours per seven day week, in the performance o2 the functions specified in Sections a. through i. above. Taa number of hours per week include, bttt are not necessarily limited to, routine mobile patrols, investigative and rescue time, court appearances and impoundment of 4angerous, wild, injured or loose animals. k. Provide a night mechanism to answer telephones from 5100 p.m. tc 800 a.m. Sunday through Saturday and an Officer after regular hours to offer limited special and emergency service to the public in the field seven days a weak. Special and emergency service includes, but is not limited to, responding to either a citizen's request or request from the Sheriff's office to aid an injured animal(s), or to impound a dangerous, sick or injured animal, or attempt to locate a stray biting animal. 1, znforco those sections of State law relating to damages to owners of livestock killed by dogs. m. The t -unty Health Cfficcr shall determine any other level of service provided within the City. Page 2 c; , 3. City shall compensate County in the a= of $26,300 plus an amount equal to the fees collected attendant to Paragraph 4 for cervices provided in this agreement, Such compensation shall constitute full payment, including reimbursement for supervision, clerical assistance, and other overhead costs. 4. The County shall use County Code Section 16.0213A(b) in the administration of an animal license program in the absence of action by the City to adopt an ordinance revising fees for an animal license program. All fees collected by County pursuant to County Code Section 16.0213A(b) shall be retained by County. 5. All work performed by County shall be performed in County offices or at such locations as designated by the County Health officer. 6. This agreement shall be effective on July 1, 1986, and shall remain in effect through June 30, 1987, but shall automatically ba extended beyond this date unless terminated or amended. This agreement may be terminated at any time with or without cause by City or by County on written notice given to the other at least 60 days before the date specified for such termination. In the case of such termination, the total fees collected attendant to an annual licensing program in the jurisdiction of the City for the year in which the termination occurs will be prorated betwe•4n the City and County. 7. To facilitate the performance of functions as provided for in this agreement, it is hereby agreed that the County shall have full cooperation and assistance from the City, its officers, agents, and employees. S. For the purpose of performing said services in this agreement, County shall furnish all necessary materials, supplle3, and equipment. 9. Notwithstanding anything hereinabove stated, it is agreed that in all instance: wherein special supplies, statl.onery, notices, forms, and the like must be iesuad in the name of the City, the same shall be supplied by said City at its own cost and expense. 10. All porsons employed in the performance of such services and functions for the City uhall be county amployeest and no County employees shall have any City pension, civil service, or other status or right. 11. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the purpose of performing ouch services and functions and for the purpose of giving official statue to the performance thereof where necassary, every Zonmty officer and employee engaged in the performance of any service hereunder shall be deemed to be an officer or employee of the City, which services are withrn the scope of this contract and are purely municipal functions. I g Page 3 t- a; 12. The City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wages, or other com- pensation to'any County officer or employee performing services hereunder for the City. Except as herein other- wise specified, the City shall not be liable for com- pensation or indatrnity to any County officer or employee for injury or siOtness arising out of his employment. 13. The City will indemnify, dofenS, and hold the County harmless from loss, coots, or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of City officers, agents, and employees occurring in the performance of this contract to the extent that such liability is imposed on the County by the provisions of Government Code Section 895.2. 14. The County will indemnify, defend, and hold tho city harm- less from loss, costs, or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of County officers, agents, and employees occurring in tho performance of this contract to the extont that such liability is imposed on the City by the provisions of Government Code, Section 895.2. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Chairman, Board of ups sors Dated ATTESTED: b Clark of the Board of pery son 010 Ua Ln ram. I a..+...a w u A"m. fSUe Ilearysitlm, ewn^ary,,c/ rybw Uwrerr..ssannwl Dated — Title Addreas MC,un,H /�t�^ AMreI MnNIm,.NleAO . 'i'i tallaae Mr.1410 Lw ae, d .. . f , rf t f %+ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT `�• 0 c DATE: December 17. 1986 1 -� TO: City Council son City Manager FRCM: City Clerk's Office SU.IJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT TITLE TO A TEA FOOT STRIP OF LAND LOCATED GENERALLY EAST OF VIACKNT ib TES BASTA FE LAND TRACK CONSISTING OF APNOZINATELY 112 ACRE. AFTER JARVART 1. 1987, IT TJ ANTICIPATED TRAT T93 PROPERTT DOSATICU WILL Psi TRUSFFRRED JU �. THE RANC110 CUCAMDnGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Staff report for this item will be available prix to the City Coueci. %eating. The attached diagram ie for your cefer•tuce. BAA /djo Attached ;7 Y,k V w� <z'F'' �/ {ƒ j\ \ ( 2• }| � � 28 , — \ ® � m ® Q�- - — -, -- fa ,r.C�_; $ _} a , I: 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager /J PREY, Mark R. Lorimer, Administrative Analyst �•'^�""� SUIJECT: APPROVAL OP AUTHORIZATION TO PURCRABE IBM COMPUTER EQUIPMENT IM .HE AHOUNT Or $4.200 PDX PDXPOBKB OP 1.E rstAnVB TRACKING CABLE TELEVIOION. MOBILE HOME RENT DATA AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE RECPARCH W EaKRZKOATIW I is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of computer equipmeat in the amount of 84,200 for purposes of legislative tracking, t,leco® Uiutioua and other administrative research. The computer e- uipment to to be h000ed in the Administration Department and used by all =mtbers of the City Manager's office. Aiiekareaed Now that the City rill have greater access to legislative and telecommunications data with which to more efficiently moaner City activities, it is necessary to purchase the appropriate compater equipment in order to access the new information. This equipment will include an IBM Personal Computer and Moaner. Foods allocated to purebese ehis equipment would come from the following accounts: 4245-7044 (City Facilities Capital Account) 83,000 4IL6 -7044 (City Clerk Ca�itsl Account) 8700 4130 -7044 (Assessment Revenue) $500 Total: 84,200 Should you have any questions or corasents regarding the purchase of this computer equipment, please feel free to contact me. `FOIL /d j■ 4 i i Y r 3,: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Decembe,, 17, 1986 199 TO: Mayor and Members .,f the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 20349 - W.7w— CONSTRi1,11 - Appeal o ann ng t—%R .ssTs ac s on reuqtr>ig a 15 foot local equestrian trail easement on the west side of Lots 14 and 15 - APN 1043- 121-01, 02, 03; 1062- 011 -02, 33; 1062- 161401. I. RECDWENDATION: Staff suggests that the City Council receive all npuRe proposed development. If after receiving all public testimony the City Council supports the decision of the Planning Commission, stcff recommends chat the City Council deny the appeal of the applicant and modify the condition per the Equestrian Advisory Committee's recommendation. II. BACKGROUAD: On November 12, 1986, the Planning ':omission approved Tina ve ract 10349, a total residential development of 57 sin le family lots on 33.2 acres of land in the Very Low 'density Residential District (less then two dwelling units per acre) At that meeting the Commission referenced a previous proposal for this site that required a local equestrian trail on the west side of Lots 14 and 15 and questicned why a sla:ilar trail was not recovmanded for the present proposal Staff responded that the Equestrian Advisory Committee had reviewta the project on October, 17, 1986. At that meetingy, no recommendation had been made regL rino the local ! questrian trail. The Planning Commission stated the local equestrian trail was necessary for internal circulation for the tract. Therefore, the Planning Commission added a condition requiring a 15 feat local equestrian trail easement be provided on the rest side of Lots 14 and 15 and that the Tentative Tract be ref,rred back to the Equestrian Advisory Committee to further revler. thn condition. III ANALYSIS: On November 21, 1986, the Equestrian Advisory Committee mef—E — discuss the Planning Coaission's condition. Having researched the previous proposal for this site, staff informed the committee that' the Condition requiring the local equestrian trail on Lots 14 and 15 came about an a recommendation by an Ad Hoc Committee to provide a visual separation and buffer between the existing homes on Thoroughbred Stniet and the proposed tract due to the differing architectural styles. 1q, 3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Appeal - Tentative Tract 10349 December 17, 1985 Page 2 In the Equestrian Advisory Committee's review of the current proposal, the member present Stated that a north -south trail on the west side of Lots 14 and 15 was necessary to provide a cosplete Internal circulation system for the tract. During the meeting, a resident of the existing Thoroughbred Street hones obJected to the proposed location of the trail. The resident lives adjacent to Lot 14 and did not want the trail next to his lot. He also presented a petition signed by all residents of the Thoroughbred Street hoaw:s opposing the trfii. In order to aftigat2 concerns of the adjacent property owners about having the equestrian trail al fitting their properties, the Equestrian Advisory Committee recamtvided that a ten foot trail be provided between Lots' 10 and 11 and that a 15 foot trail bs provided between Lots 17 and 19. These trails would take the place `of the trail on the west side of Lots 14 and 15 whilo still maintaining a cruplete internal trail system. This would satisfy the intent of the Planning Commission to provide an interconnected trail system within the tract. The following rewording of Condition 18 is recommended: 18. A ten (10) root local equestrian trail casement shall be Provided along the coanm. fifteen een (15) footeelo alts equestria11. trall easecent shall be provided along the common property line between Lots 17 and 19. In that only one *r%aber of the Equestrian Advisory Committee was present at the November 21, 1986 wue% ag, a netting was scheduled on December 10, 1906 to further review the proposal. At that time, with three members presc -, it was G:! •.onrensus of the Committee that the recowthdatiorr of the Noveo:ier 21, 1986 meeting was appropriate in order to achieve the desired internal trail circulation. Respectfully submitted, �y C' is,00'Li Brad huller QZ City Planner BO:SM:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit 'B" - Letter of Appeal Exhibit "C" - Equestrian Advisory Committee Minutes - November 21, 1986 Exhibit 'D" - Petition Fran Homeowners Exhibit 'E" - Planning Commission Retolution of Approval u 4 C � FuWORM ll ,X - ip CITY Or ME\ 1+ P%ANCHO CUCAIMO N•GA P[ANNIW, DIVISION EXHIBM iF SGl[� Y • a Construction 2011 uat enanclan war / peat oatco tea 775 / 94MV& calnot 1891740 / (118) 9e0 4505 November 21, 1986 City Clerk City of Rancho Glcamonge 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Condition of Resolution No. 86-170 Tentative Tract No. 10349 Gentlemen: In accordance with your appeal provfolons we respectfully request a hearing before the City Council to reconsider Condition 18 of the subject resolution. In accordance with the Planning Commission Recommendation the Walton Construction CorporaCon attempted to meat with the Trails Committee on November 21, 1986. Resolution of the subject condition could not be resolved because of a Lael. of quorum. Condition 18 A fifteen feet local equestrian trail easement shall be provided along the westerly boundary of Lots 14 and 15. This item was requested by Commissioner Chitfea and reluctantly agreed to at the Planning Commission hearing subject to review by the Trails Committee. On November 21, 1986 representatives of Walton Construction Corporation and Mr. James Anderson, a homeowner, presented a petition signed by all of the homeowners in the Thoroughbred tract requesting the deletion of this Condition. As previously stated, only Commissioner Mitlea was in attendance. We presented the following facts to eliminate Condition l8: 1 Walton Construction Corporation has agreed to all of the Trails Committee recommendations. 2. The feed trail proposed by Cemmiseia"r ChlLiea was not recommended by the Trails Committee during reviews in 1981 end 1986. 3. Lots 14 and 15 are the only lots served by the proposed trail and have direct access to feeder trails north and south of �^ these lots. 1 71,,,,, l =w ///4 / /CDf B ` Y' :_ r .y i I November 21, 1986 V. City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga Pne 7 a'. We believe that these conditions impose redundant, unequl,table end i unreasonable requests or u developer who has already net virtually all of the requests of the surrounding neighbors, tue 1985 Ad Hoc Committee and rev7sed City requirements. Your favorable docisica is sought. Sincerely, WALTON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Q Guy llie", Jr. Consu t CAW /mj :s a "lilt BQUESTRI" ADVISORY C0BOUT `8_E CC 1).0 QNT BAST PROJECT DESCRIPTIOV- TT 10349- J ton Construction- A 57 lot residential supdivisinn located on the west side of Sapphire, south of Jennett. Staff present: Bruce Cook Consnittee members present: Suzanne Chitlaa Mvenber O1, 1986 issuES, The Planning Commission reviewed this project at their meeting of • November 12, 1986 and referred It back for further review of the Trails committee to consider the following issues:: a) The necessity of requiring a local trail along the westerly property line of Lots 14 8 15 to provide additional buffer to the exltting tomes to the west. b) Evaluate the proposed Community Trail along Sapphire to determine if it shouia be developed at the standard 20' width, or if it should be developed at the 11' width to match the existing parkway to both the north and !ouch. ACTION: The Traits Committer has reviewed this project per the direction of the Plagning Commission and has recommended the followings ;•:> a) A north-tooth iceai feeder trail should be provided to provide a connection across Thoroughbred Street consistent with the Trails CowM ttes policy of promoting a continuous and inter - connrctad trail network with a complete internal circulation system. A 30' troll along the wdstarly boundary of Lots 14 S 15 would satisfy this requirement. However. in attempt to mitigate concerns of adjacent property owners about having an equestrian trail abutting their property`, the Trails Cowittee would supgust the location o: this north -south trait as follows: •provide a 10' local trail that is bisected by the common property line of Lots 10 811 - provide a IV local trail bisected by the coemnn property line•of Lots 17 6 18. b1 The Community Trail proposed for Sapphire Street should be developed at the ' parkway standard to be consi:tent with surrounding development. i THOROUGHBRED M13ST HOUHOVNBRS ALTA LOKA, CALBlORt11A November 13, 1986 Traps Committee City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 On November 12, 1986 the Rancho Cucamonga planning Commiselon -incepted with few exceptions ■ proposed building project consisting of single family homes on Thoroughbred Street, west of Sapphire Street In Alta Loma. ' The residents of Thoroughbred Street support this proje..t ccetpletely and welcome the addition to our city with few exceptions. Those exceptlom are a result of your Trails Committee recommendations for additional north /south horse trolls. One of most Importance O the proposed trail adjacent to existing homeowners. Representatives of Thoroughbred Street will be sent noWicatloo of the Trails Committee meeting and will be present to discuss these Us= with you. Also Included Is a complete list of the homeowners on Thorouehored Street who reside next to the proposed project. Out signatures request the elimination cf these additional trails In our neighborhood. Thoroughbred Street Homeowners Alta Loma, California Attachment I c, 9 THOROUGHBRED STREET HOLEOWNERS ALTA LOMA, CALL*OR2M The following list of bomoovners on Thoroughbred Street ask you to eliminate the request for additional home trails on the proposed building project that will be adjacent to our existing homes. 22. Address &Y Thoroughbred Street 8111 Thoroughbred Street --� �03 Thoroughbred Street O Thoroughbred Street Mo'4S�! Thorougbbred Street Thoroughbred Street 7997 Thoroughbred Street )987 Thoroughbred Street y 99 ! Thoroughbred Streeu Xv4 i-_ Thoroughbred Street 801' I Thoroughbred Street 8070 Thoroughbred Street fQO Thoroughbred Street JJW Thoroughbred Street 19L0 Thoroughbred Strict Z °r q, Thoroughbred Street O/ Thoroughbred Street &IJAD Thoroughbred Street 802.5 Thoroughbred Street 7 <, rZ Thoroughbred Street Thoroughbred Street Thoroughbred Street S� +, �r RESOLUTION NO. 86-170 A RESOLUTION OF THL PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF' RANCHO CUCANdIGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT HAP NO. 10349 AND OESIGN REVIEW THEREOF. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map Nu. 10349, hereinafter 'Y,ap' submitted by Welton Construction, applicant, for thn purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cla:amanga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential - subdivision of 37 lots on 33.2 acres of land located on the west side of Sapphire Street, .south of Jannot Street, regularly came before the Planning Comission for public hearing and action on November 12, 1986; end WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Nap subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissiva has road and considered the Engineering and Planing Division's reports end has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to en a 4 Tract Ao. 10349 and the Nap thereof: (a) The tentative tract, in conjunction with the Variance request, is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The desMgn or improvements' of the tentative tract. in cok4unctioo with the Varian✓ request, is consistant with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of dayelopment propossa; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) Thgjesign of the Nntativs tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or -so of the property within the proposed subdivision. , PLANNING COMMISSION aESOLLRION NO. TT 10349 WALTON CON JCTION November 12, 1986 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse Impacts on the environmant and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Nap No. 10349, a copy of which is attached eri eToind design review thereof, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: , 1. Approval of Tentative Tract Nap No. 10339 is contingent upon approval of variance 86-05. 2. All corner side elevations shall be upgraded to match the front elevations. x 3. Wood or stucco plant -ons shall be provided around all windows on all elevations. 4. A design treatment for the area between garage doors that is similar to the design treatment used on the ends of the garage elevation shall be provided. S. All roofing matorial shill be tile. 6. Extensive landscaping shall be provided along the east side of Lots 1 and 67 subject to review and approval of the City Planner. 7. A revised grading plan, incorporating all conditions of approval, shall be submitted to the Grading Committed for review arA approval prior to the issuance of any permits. 9. A 15 foot community trail with Offer of Padieatlon shall be provided along the northerly tract perimeter of Lots 33, 34, 35, 40, 41, 42, and 47. 1. 9. Local feeder trail easements, 15 feet in width that straddle the property line, shall be provided In the following locations: a. Extending north from Jennet Street to the northerly tract boundary hetwoen lots 35 -37 and 38-40. b. Extending north from Jennet Street to the northerly tract boundary batvetr. lots 42 -44 and .j' 44 -46. e. Extending eastePiY from Avenue ' ' to th axSsJ�ngl�r� 19539) between lots 18, 20, 4� Asa G "Fv PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. IT 10349 NALTON COf lUCTION }�•' November 12, 1986 'u Page 3 10. Corner cut -offs 00 local feeder trails for inside angles ,a when trails change directions shall be provided. { 11. A ten foot wide local feeder trail shall be provided along • the northerly boundary of lots 51 -57. 12. A ton foot wide local feeder trail shall be provided along the westerly boundary of lots 31 -33. 13. The tract shall be graded to provide a minima 15 foot level arts on the lot adjacent to the local feeder - trails. 4 14. Vehicle access' (drive approaches) and vehicle access gates i• shall be provided when the local feeder trail intersects the street. 35. The Covenants, Conditrona and Restrictions (CC4R's) shall v' provide for the establishment and maintenance of an architectural review cawitbe to regulats development, remodeling, and additions within the tract. 16. Thar Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCIh's) shall provide for the maintenance of equestvdan trail and drainage aismsents. 17. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCIR's) shall provide for City approval an the installation of any Wall or fence on Lots 3 or 67. 18. A fifteen (35) foot iocal equestrian Nmsil aaseawint shall k' be provided along the westerly boundary of Lots 14 and 15. c� ENGINEERING DIVISION: F 4. EXISTING OYERL'EAU UTILITIES a. Lines along the North Proparty Lines of Lots 51 through 57: The existing overhead utilities (electrical) along the north property lines of loth 51 through 67 shall be undergrounded or removed fcr the entire length of the utility lines,extendlnp across Sapphire Street prior to Public Improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichaver, y. occurs first. Reieburseemnt of one -h'ilf the adopted cost for undergroundiol is not feasible because the +Wacent property is Presently , y, developed. r4` L~..:1 il.. •I E\ TT 10349 dovember Page 4 b. Sapphire Strest: An in -liou fee as contribution to VA future under9roundingy of the existing overhead utilities (telacammiations anf electrical ) on the opposite side of Sa,)pllire Street shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the Final Map. The fee shall be one -half the adopted unit amount 21ma the length Of tM protect frontage on Sapphire Street (498). 2. Positive &,Slnage control facilities mall IN provided within the equestrian trails in acrcldance wish City Standard No. 1001 or as otherwise required by the Ndlding official. 3. Drainage Orotection shall be provided at the south corner of Thoroughbred Street and Avenue °A' as follows or as otherwise approved by the City Engfneir: a. A 2' high block wall for firalnage protection shall be provided at the biek of the sidewalk from tla easterly edge of VA driveway on lot 13 to tills westerly edge of tl driveway or lot 12. b. The driveway for lot 13 shall be wvA as far westerly as possiblo and the driveway for lot 12 shall is moved as far easterly is possible to maximize the length of the wall regv'rad per *a". abllve. c. The driveways for lots 11, 12, and 13 shall be rolled ti provide a minimum one foot barrier above thr top of curb. APPMYED AM ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOYEW10, 1986. THE CITY OF RANCHO CKAIIOIM % BY lid PLANNING t0mlSSION'RESOLIRI00 NO. e : ? TT 10315 HALTON COi ' tUCTION November 12, 1516 Page 5 r P� YN E '.1 i,. I ii• = I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cowission of the City of Rancho Cucaamp, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cmissiou of the City of Rancho Cucaaawiga, at a re ular weting of the Planning Comfssion held on the 12 day 0 November, 1916, by the following vote to -wit; AYES. COMMISSIONERS: TCLSTOY, MCNIEL. BARKER. CHITI_EA, STODT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: *ME ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 1,575 r i , r., 1' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGF. STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT: HOUSING eOLICIES REPORT FOR TH�RnChO�Let RECOMMENDATIOH: Approve the attached Housing Policies Report for the Rancho ucamogna c evelopment Agency by adopting the attached Resolution. ANALYSIS- The Housing Policies Repart for the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Mgency as been prepared in conformance with the requirements of the Internal residential bondefinance program Tmust issue oa Housingspolicies Report prior to December 31, 1986, in order to be able to issue similar bonds in 1987. necessaryito reviews and adoptytheirequirediHousing Polici shReportstue, it is Although this report identifies the housing policies for the Redevelopment Agency Mortgage Revenue Bond Program, federal requirements specify thit the City Council is the applicable elected representative of the Agency. For this reason, the City Council is the proper legislative body to review and approve the Housing Policies Report for the Agency. This report has been noticed and scheduled as a Public Hearing as required by the Internal Revenue Code. It is necessary for the Council to receive all public testimony, both oral and in writing, and to incorporate the testimony Into the report. The Council must slso direct the City Clerk to make copies available to the public and to file a copy of the entire report with the Internal Revenue Service Center. Respectfully sub.)ittod, M.. V u', n Community Development Director Attachments: Housing Policies Report Resolution �11 't Q. fa ". ti If l REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYEi w POLICY REPORT NUMBERt 52- 1385008 103A 157 NMI IM INTRODUCTION - On July 18, 1984, Congress enacted Into law the Tax Reform Act of 1984 —'1. This Act Imposes certain requirements on Issuers of qualified single family mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates. One of these requirements Is that issuers publish a statement of their housing policies with respect to housing, development, and low Income hovoing assistance and report on their compliance, for the one year period preceding the date of the report, with the Intent of Congress that qualified mortgage bond Issues and mortgage credit certificates give priority to families of lower Intone to afford tome ownership before assisting higher income families. In order to qualify for a federal tax exemption for Interest on the qualified mortgage bonds to be Issued In FY 1980/87, this Report must be pubIbbod prior to December 31, 1985. As the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the ' Agency") plans to issue qualified single family mortgage bonds In PY 1988/87, the following report Is being published In order to comply with IN requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended, and the regulations thereunder. lious!n pollcles aed Deals ^ The California State Legislature has frond turd den red truti It is necessary and essential that redevelopment agencies be authorized to make long -term, low - interest loans through qualified mortgage icnders to finance residential construction In order to encourage Investment and upgrade redevelopment project areas and Increase the supply of housing. Unless redevelopment agencies generate mortgage funds and provide some form of assistance to finance residential construction, many redevelopment areas will stagnate and deteriorate because owners and Investors are unable to obtain loam from private sources (California Health and Safety Code Section 33750.) a program to provide residential construction financing would accomplish the followings (a) Facilitate Increasing the supply of urban housing and ease the housing shortage that exists In many parts of too state. (California Health and Safety Code Section 31" ^I.) The Agency plans to Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds In PY 1888/87 furtherance of the above stated policies of the California State Legislature and conformance to the following policies and goals: Q) Use of Proceeds - The proceLde of the bonds will be used V once the acquisition of residences. (Il) TarttotinR of Proceeds to HouslnQ Typo - The proceeds of the bo w o targeted to new ng a family housing. (110 Determination of Need for Willing - The Agency has datam ned the need for targeting the bond proceeds for we In the acquisition of now homes based on the above stated excerpts of the California Health and Safety Cede as well as the City's adopted 1061 Housing Elomen,t. Uv) aletnod of T ha Proceeds - In order to Insure that wTbon procee are used to assist families in the acquisition of now tames, the monies will be targeted to those developers with Proleets which are newly constructed and not occupied, under construction, or anticipated for construction during the bond program. (v) Other Pertinent Information - Due to the availability of the bond program, the ncy does not Intend to Issue a mortgage credit certificate program, because they would, by necessity, be directed to higher Income persons than the housing bond program. t NO Housin Policies Coordination - The housing policies stated lure tole are in conformance with the Rancho Cucamonga 1004 Housing Element of the General Plan ` which Includes program 5.1, which states "administer and continue to develop residential mortgage bonds whereby lower Interest loans can be Issued to t5rst time home tuyer, eerning at or below 120% of the establLahed tacdlas income level ". The Housing Policies set forth above conform to the Development Policies and the Low Income Housing Assistance Policies stated herein. A(2) Develo men[ Pollcles and Goals -The California State Legislature ban oun and deo d t tt It is necessary and essential that redevelopment aganclen, be authc Need to make long -tam, low - Interest loans through qualified mottgage lenders to finance residential ecnstruct(on In order to encourage investment and upgrade redevelopment project areas and Increase the supply of housing. Unless redevelopment agencies generate nortgago funds aml provide some form of assistance to finance residential construction, many ,redevelopment areas will stagnate and deteriorate because owners and Investors are unable to obtain loans from private sources. (California Health and Safety Code. °ection 95750.) The California State Legislature has additionally found and declared thatt -2- t ■ a ppr[ooggrcam to provide residential construction financing would aceampll =h thefcllowing: (n) Facilitate increasing the supply of urban housing and ease the housins( shortage that :Meta in many parts of the stats. (b) Stimulate urban bWlding and construction activity and thereby Increase urban employment and Improte the urban tax base. (California Health and Safety Code Section 55751(a) and (b).) (c) It is the Intent of the Legislature, In enacting this chapter, to strengthen the vitality and promote the completion of urban redevelopment for the general public benefit. (California Health and Safety Code Section 15752.) The Agency plans to Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds In FY MOM In furtherance of the above stated policies of the California State Leg(slaturo and in conformance to the following policies and goals (i) Ta etin of Proceeds to Area - All of the proceeds of the bon w De targeted for rpecifla areas and developments in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. (10 DeserlD..on of T et Areas - Tin target areas lrolude 0 t . n y hose tands des ate for residential development as identified by Oe lard use map of the General Plan ..f it* City of Rancho Cucamonga. These ^asidential designation may include land suitable for either elngls famLLy detached or attached dwelling units, but 1.1 no case will converted multiple family projects be s.eluded as part of a target area. ■ (10 Selection of TsrFet Atari - The Agenny has chosen Undeveloped and deVelOpItiff residentiatly designstsd land for its bond target area duce these lends will msxlmize the use of the proceeds for the sequisitlon of new homes. (IV) Use of eted�Proceeds - The proceeds of the bonds nTch will be targeted fo! the areas described to tit) above will be used to finance the acquisition of new construction. (v) other rertinent latormatlon - The Agency has no other per nent — orm—a o�tate with respect to these development policies regarding bond proceeds. (vt) Dev _ �ment ON" Coordination - The development polfctes s t here rm vo are conformance with bath the Housing Moment and the General Flan since only those lands designated for residential land use shell he eligible to utilize the proceeds of trw bond prrgram. These stated development policies aro a'so In Acs a f ,vnforinance with the Housing 7ements housing assistance policies In that residentially designated lands, r located within the redevelopment Project Area, are able to participate In the program which will help to avoid over - concentration of tamales of low - income in any one project. or ;bea. The Development Policies set forth above conform to the Housing Policies anJ the Low Income Housing Assistance PoWeles stated herein. A(3) Low Income Hotein Aadstance Policies and Ooa1.s - The California State I.eglslature has found and declared that a program to provide reeldontlal _ construction financing would accomplish the foWwingr (a) Encourage Calfforniam of all social and economic positions to reinhabit urban cress, thereby rendering these areas more socially bslanaed and economically self- suffletent. (California Health and Safety Cade Section 93751.) ' The Agency plans to Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds In 1986 and In conformance to tho fouwing policies and goals: (1) Targetirur Proceeds According to Income - Hone of the proceeds of the bonds wW necesaar y be targeted to low income families, moderate Income families, or median Income famtlles. (Ill tet of cling Proceeds - The Agency does not nted u T ny method to target the money to lorver Income famWs. 010 Other Pertinent Information - The Agency has no other Pertinent orma onto state. (Iv) Inw Income Housing Assstance 111cles Coordination - he ent c pated 1983 Agency i.nd ogram ^ not expected to provide assistance to low and moderate Income families. The 1986 Bond Program will, however, In conjunction with an e-spaated City desue,make available bond Iroceeds speeiflestly for these family categories. Thus, while tho Agency ford Program • 71 not necessarily be available for persons ma:dn4 ' 1-1 120% of the establbhed median Income, loner Income housing assistance will be coordinated through the Anticipated 1886 City of Renci,o Cucamonga Bond Program. Tito law Income HousinT Asalete-nce PCUHas act forth' above, conform to the Housing Poilo +m and Devalapmem Policies stated herein. - I, _g_ PART B - ASSEE9MENT UP CC_4PLIANCE WITH PP.EVIOUq_ REPORT is For pj�mo t e B f cop NW. r odatedJ 01908. F h�� recaon the assessment o mb � a relates the p M f if ne beginning July 1, 1935 std ending June 30,1988. In the opinion of the Redavelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Agency has successfully Impletoented Its policies Idontifled In the p•lor Housing Report as they relate to housFtg, development and low- income ovals °once, The Agency has targeted the bond proceeds •o assist first thab home buyers in acquiring newly constructed homes within the Idtutlfled Project Ares, PART C - COMPLIANCE WITH 1Hgt f OP CONOpESS Poe the Purposaa o(tnis section, :his report is dated June 30,198e. C(1) On April 1e, 1983, blob were said by a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) In the afheegete amount sit $22,074,000 (the 1993 Eondai. The Redevelopment Agency of the Prom of Rancho Cucamcnga Participated in the JPA and the amount of the prucbods to be used In Rancho Cucamonga Is $4410;000 (2296 of the Issue). The 1'oT,owing information is Prostded with respect to the 1903 Bondst (1) McBod of Dbtrlbutin 1983 Bond Proceeds - The Presets o the bond suo w efi represent the Agency's portica were distributed to a specific developer based on t;*Ir project feasibility, e5I1ity to ntillze the money, the houainf type and Un sort of the home- dI} Assistance to tower Income Pon III - None of the proeeede o the 85 Bard wh(c�i '1e- to be used In Rane.'w llmgo wUl necessarLty benefit lower Income (110 :nLCme bowls - The Portion of the 1983 Bonds to be used F ..si nctts`Cucamonga will be available to those persons or fam'Les eartdttg 120% of the median Income and above' Icasmtr, h ee the 1985 Bonds were issued In April 1985, no loans wets funded prior to the date of Udu Report, Jtme 30, 1983. C(1) Go August 23, 1984, the Agency issued single famil bonds residential mortgafe lls In the aggregate prlttcipal amotmt of $24,175,000, (the 1984 bonds) In an effort to assist lower Income (nmilles to afford home ownersMp. As of June 30, 1988 atlxoslmately $13,485,(;73 of the Both proceeds rentehod available for use, The foltowin� informatisn is provided with reapere to the 1984 %ndv (q Method of DLst lbutlna 1984 Bond Proceeds The peocceds o t bowl were dbtr buted W Participat.ng developers based on specific feasibility, ability to utilize money, the hothtudeng tgpy at�tdt the cwt of the home. i (10 Assistance to Lower Income Families - The method used by the Agency to strlbute the proceeds of the 1984 Bony as described In (1) above was not designed necessarily to assist ]ewer Income families. To date, the proceeds of the 1984 Bonds have provided financial assistance to 0 moderate Income families and 0 median 2 Income iamiD3s In the acquisition of a new home. G'.1) Income Levels - A total of $3,148,373 Is available to fund mortgage loser to those persons woo earn between 0 and 12091 of the established rnedlrn Income. A total of $12,317,300 Is avallable to fund mortgage loans to those persons who earn abnve 120% of the established median Income. `'. CM On March 1, 1983, the Agency issued single family residential bonds In the aggregate principal amount of $36,200,000 (the 1983 Bonds) In an effort to assist lower Income families to afford home ownership. As of June 30, 1986, approzimatoly $496,930 of the bond proceeds remained available for use. The following Information Is provided with respect to these 1983 bonds (1) method of Distributi^ 1983 Bond Proceeds - The peocee o the bonds tr ware d buted to spectre partlnipattng developers based on their foastblllty, their ahllity to utilize the money, the housing type and the cost of the home. (11) Assistance to Lower Income Families - The method used by the envy to d tr buts the proceeds of the 1983 Bonds as described in (1) above was not necessarily derlgned to assist lower Income families before higher Income families. To date, the proceeds of the 1983 Ponds havb provided financial assistance for Mme ownersldp to 14 moderate Income families and 81 median Income families In the acquisition of a new Mme. (III) In ^one Levels - Of the $498,090 remsiing In tM 1933 ndoprogmm, approximately $124,212 b avallabLs to those flmWes who earn between 0 and 120% of the established median Income. The remaining amount, approsdmetely $372,638 is available to thoon families who cur. above 120% of the establlshad median Income. The Agency has not bled any qualified mortgago bony prior to the 1983 Bonds provloenly discrosed. The Agency has not Issued mortgage credit rertlflestes prior to the date of this policy report. .7- /(A3 This report is submitted by the yndersigned elected representative of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agony. This Report wm accepted and approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at Its meeting of _ through the adoption of Resolution No. Dennis tout, Mayor A7TF8:, i r` Beverly A. Authelet, City Cfeik t 3 a, aaal Y' a RESOLUTION NO. 7G — J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING HOUSING POLICY REPORT OF RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT ICY PUBLICATION INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 103A AND OIRCTIN RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: WHEREAS. Section 103A(J)(5) of the internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, as implemented by proposed and temporary regulations of the Department of the Treasury, Section 6a.103A -2(1), requires the subsidy bbonds to elected publish, afters public heart gea housing policy report; WHEREAS, this Council 1s the applicable elected representative of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency which Agency proposes to Issue in 1987 qualified mortgage subsidy bonds; WHEREAS, this Cwncil has received a draft housing policy report of said Agency dated December 17, 1986, and has reviewed each and every part thereof and this Council has conducted a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public, benefit that said Musing policy report be approved and published; follows: u NON. THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED as 1 The City Manager of the City is hereby authorized and directed to prepa•a a summary of the comments made at the to be aforesaid Included as ai parts of9the Policy sReport under Section 103A. 2. The report of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency entitled, 'Policy Report Under Section 103A•, and dated December 17, 1986, is hereby approved with the inclusion of said summary of comments. 3. The Mayor of the City, as a member of this Council, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said report on behalf of this Council as the duly elected representative of the Agency. 4. This Council does hereby publish the Report by authorizing ,. and directing the City Clerk, and the City Clerk is hereby said Rert in the Office of thee City , Clerkafor distrlb,tionatoathe so authorized and to public. :a &S h Resolution No. Page 2 -r- 5. Tho City Clerk of the City is hereby authorized and directed to file the Report with the Internal Revenue Service at the Intr nal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19255. PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED THIS r. 7 CrfY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1986 TO: Mayer and Members of City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director ..a .r BY: Olen Jones. Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: HOUSING POLICIES REPORT FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS REQUIRED Nr RTrr6NZO'3 OT L Y NU RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Housing Policies Report for the City of anti E o Cucamonga by adopting the attached Resolution. ANALYSIS: The Housing Policies Report ftor the City of Rancho Cucamonga has Teen preyared in conformance with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code., Section 103A. This section requires that any Issuer of a residential berd finance program must issue a Housing Policies Report prior to December 31, 1986, in order to be able to issue similar bonds in 1987. Anticipating that the City might be involved in such an issue, it is necessary to review and adopt the required Housing policies Report. This report has been noticed and scheduled as a Public Hearing as required by the internal Revenue Code. It is iecessary for the Council to receive all public eort and t oii h r ehspis ntothe rep The Council must also direct the CityClerktomakecoe available to the public and to file a copy of the entire report with the Internal Revenue Service Center. RespeQtfully spWtted, Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director Attachment: Housing Policies Report Resolution N 1(o7 T- J. p THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYER IDEN:'IPICATION NUMBERS 25-3213002 9 POLICY REPORT UNDER SECTION 103A a AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING POLICIES REPORT INTRODUCTION - On July le, 1984, Congress enacted Into law the Tax Reform Act of 98 . T et Imposes certain requirements on Issuers of qualified single family mortgage bonds and mortgage credt certificates. One of theca requirements Is that Issuers publish a statement of their housing poJcies with respect to housing, dayslopment, and low Income housing. assistance and report on their compl!ance, for the one year period preceding the date of the report, with the Intent of Congress that qualified mortgage tend Issues and mortgage credit eiett icales give priority to families of lows Income to afford tame ownership before asdaling higher income families. In order to qualify for a federal tax exemptlon for Intereitt on the qualified mortgage bonds to be Issued In PY 1980,/87, this Report must be pubUsla•d prior to December 31, 1985. As the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") plans to Issue quallflad single family mortgage bonds In PY 19811/87, the following report Is being published In order to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the regulations thereunder. PART A - POLICIES AND GOALS A(1) Hoosl Polleies and Goals -The Calllornla State Legislature has found and R t stn there exists within the Shtte of California a serfous shortage of decent Cale and sanitary Musing wideb Is affordable to many persons In the state. This shorteg. U exacerbated during periods of rising interest rates, particularly as high Interest rates have the. effect of diminishing the number of otherwise credit worthy buyers from qualifying for private se^_ter mortgage capital aources. In order to reme0y this adverse affect on potential inme buyers on the lower end of the purchasing spectrum, It Is necessary to implement a public program to reduce the cost of mortgage financing for single family purchases for these peroons unable to compete fer mort ;age financing in the conventional mortgage market. (California Health and Safety Code - Section 52001.) The California State Legislature has a'dl•.Ionally found and declared thatn It Is necessary and essential that counties and cities be authorized to directly and Indirectly make long-term, tow - interest loans to persons not pre3ently eligible for financing through private sector lending Institutions to finance construction, rehabilitation, and acquisition of Mmes In order 's encourage investment and lorxl upgrads areas. (California Health and Safety Cab - Section 52002.) The City plans to Line qualified single family mortgage bonds In PY 1988/87 In furtherance of the above stated policies of the California State Legislature and in conformance to the following policies and gtmasn -2- rG9 (d) Housinil Policies Coo:dlatlon - This housing policies s I tated hmnatave are E oiTormanae with the Rancho CucsmonO;a11994 Housing Slament of. the General Plan •itdch includes orogram 5.1, which states "administer and continue to develop residential mortgage bonds whereby lower Interest loans can be Issued to "Irct time home buyers, earnhug at or below 12096 of the established median Income level ". The HousnF Policies set forth above conform to the Development Policies and the Low Income Housing Aoststanee Policles etated herein. A(2) Develo menu Pollciev and Goals - The California State Legislature has ' o ndi declare. .r r° there exists 'within Um State of California, a serious shortage of decent ' 0) Use of Proceeds - The proceeds of the bonds will be used state. This shortage is exacerbated during rising Interest rates, to 75Zic-e Me Requisition of residences. (11) T�er�get "" 0 Honsin� Inge - The proceeds of of otherwisalcradlttworthy buyers private �Oroleed+�to the too swill a terge� bed fo ne+r�ngla family housing. (110 Determination of Need for T�a_r?atln - The City tau potential home buyers on the lower end of the purchasing spectrum, it Is e3 tu"Ined t le nec or targoift the bond p otteds for •r necessary to Implement a public program to reduce the crest of mortgage use In the anquieltlon of new homes based on the abo're financing for single family purchases for those persons muble to eoir atatsd excerpts of the CaWornia liaalth and Safety Code s. for mortgage financing In the conventional mortgage market. (CWfornla as well as the City's adopted 1994 Housing Moment.. Health and Safety Code - election 5200L) (Iv) Method of�Tarr +ctlgProceada - In order to insure that, dYi,) i en —fond proc+oe u are used w ndst famillas In the 1 acquisition of new homes, the monies will be lrgeted to those, developers with projects which are newly ,� •'/ constructed and not occupied, under construction, or anticipated for construction during the bor,,d program. (v) Other Pertinent Information - Duo to the availability of program, UW-U ty does not Intand to lesue a mortgage credit eretifloate program, because they would, by necessity, be directed to hWw Income parsons than the hood if bond program. (d) Housinil Policies Coo:dlatlon - This housing policies s I tated hmnatave are E oiTormanae with the Rancho CucsmonO;a11994 Housing Slament of. the General Plan •itdch includes orogram 5.1, which states "administer and continue to develop residential mortgage bonds whereby lower Interest loans can be Issued to "Irct time home buyers, earnhug at or below 12096 of the established median Income level ". The HousnF Policies set forth above conform to the Development Policies and the Low Income Housing Aoststanee Policles etated herein. A(2) Develo menu Pollciev and Goals - The California State Legislature has ' o ndi declare. .r 1 there exists 'within Um State of California, a serious shortage of decent safe and sanitary housing, which is affordable to many persons in the state. This shortage is exacerbated during rising Interest rates, particularly fromcoqualifyingifor of otherwisalcradlttworthy buyers private sector sector mortgage sources. In order to remedy this adverse effeet on potential home buyers on the lower end of the purchasing spectrum, it Is •r necessary to Implement a public program to reduce the crest of mortgage ; financing for single family purchases for those persons muble to eoir for mortgage financing In the conventional mortgage market. (CWfornla , Health and Safety Code - election 5200L) 5 "t< •,, i ',dry yMy , i,'{± •'/ ? JX- The California Stato Legislature has additionally found and declared that+ It Is necessary and essential that evuntles eras cities be authorized to directly and Indirectly make long -term, low- Interest loans to persons not presently eligible for financing through private sector lending Institutions to finance construction, rehrbilitatlon, and aegLdrdUon of homes In order to encourage Investment and upgrade local areas. (California Health and Safety Code - Section 52002.) Tim City plans to Issue quallfled a] le family mortgage bonds In FY 1988/87 In furtherance of the above stated poUMes of the California State Legislature and In conformance to the following policies and goals: (1) 1 mmi�le� of Proceeds to Areas - All of than proceeds of tl bonnie will be targeted —for specific areas and developments In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 01) Deseriptlon of Tr at Amex - The target areas Include only those a:, gate for residential der s as Identified by the land use map of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These residential desrtians may Include land sultable for either single famlly detached or attached dwelling units, but in no case will converted multiple family projects be Included as pert of a target area. (fill Selection of Ter et Areas - The City has chosen u ev and eve. ng residentially designated land for Ids bond target area since these lands will maximize the use of the proceeds for the acquisition of new homaa (Iv) Use of Tar eted Proceeds - The proceeds of the bonds w Ch w . targeted for the aress described In 01) above will be and to finance be acquisition of new construction. (v) Other Pertinent Information - The City has no other p +en arms on to state with respect to these devalopmant policies ragerding bond proceeds. NO Developmolt Policies Coordination - The development po c as statea nerelaiLove are in conformance with bath the Housing 8lement and the General Plan since only those letxls designated for realdentlal land use shall be eligible to utilize the proceeds of the bond program. Thaso stated development policies are also In cony tmanee with the flousWif Elements lousing arrtance policies In that residentially designated lands .sough cut the City nre able to participate in the program wh;eh will help to avoid over - concentration of families of low-income In any one project or area. The Development Policies eat forth above conform to the -C- / -7f i r i• Horsing Policies and the Low Income Housing Ar-' A ice Policies stated : ereln. A(g) Low Income Housing Assistance Polleies end Goals - Under the California rate Ugistature cortain income restrictions must be compiled with In order to Issue qualified single family mortgage boner. These income limitations, which era outlined in Sections 50199(b) and 52020(d) of the California Health said Safety Code, restrict portlorm of he bond allocation to first time tame buyers whose incomes do not ezceed 120% of the median Income. For this reason, certain portions of the money must be used to fund Icons to tow, median and moderate Income fantlHes: The Legislature also allows for monies to be used to fund mortgage loans to first time home buyers earning between 120% and 150 %, of the median Income. While this money may not benefit lower Income families the money will benefit families who may not have otherwiao quallfed to purchase a home. The Californlj Health and £afety Code Boas contain other income restrictiors where the family is not a first time buyer or where the home has been previously occupied. Sir," the City intends to target the proceeds of the bond issue to assisting first time home buyers In acquiring a new home, these other income restrictions are not anticipated to be toed to a greet extent In the Bond Program. The City plans to Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds In 1988 In conformrnce with the following policies and goals (Q Tarxetlnlc Proceeds Aecordinur to Income - The City of Rancho Cucamonp will target a portion of the bond proceeds In excess of the first $20,000,000 received for families of moderst - (50% to 90% of the established median Income) and median - (meaning, 100% of the estnbliahed median Income) Incomes. (10 - Metlad of Tarretin, Proceeds - The City of Rancho td Cucamonga 'ntas to use the method for targeting the bond proceeds to the Income levels described in (1) above by ancouregtng the participating developers to use these bond proceed monies for fLenelnrg lower cost horsing. (110 Other Pertinent huformatlon - The City Intends to use at east 90% of — the Send rocetds for families which qualify as first time home btyora. (Iv) Low Income flousine Assistance Polices Coordination - e housing ass atance pc c es stated ere above arc In conformance with the City's General Plan as well as Program 5.1 of the adopted IM Rousing Element. The Low Income Ilnustry, Assistance Policies set forth above conform to the dousing Policies end Development Policies stated herelt. - -� ^• -5- r V PART B- ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH PREVIOUS REPORT For purposes of the essessment of compliance with the previous Report, this Report is dated Juno 30, 1988. For thls reason the assewment of compliance relates to the period of time beginning July 1, 1085 and ending June 30, 1986. In the opinion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City has suer.Kastully Implemented Its Policies identitled In the prior Housing Report as they relate to houstng, development and low - income assistance. The City has torEeted the bond proceeds to assist lower Income families who are Urst time home buyers In acquiring nowly constructed homes Within the City. PART C - COMPLIANCE WITH INTENT OF CONGRESS For the purposes of this section, this Report is dated June 30, 1986. C(1) In April 1985, bonds were gold by The City of Rancho Cucamonga in the aggregate amount of 853,725,000 (the 1985 Bonds). Tie following Information Is provided with respect to the 1985 Bonds: (1) Method of Dlstributi 1285 >lond Proceeds - The �+ proceeeds of i bond sue were d tribute to speciHe participating developers bawd on their pro) -et feasibility, ability to utilize the money, the housing type and the cost of the home. 00 Assistance to Lower Income Families - As of June 30, 1935 none of the proceeds of the 1965 Bond has been used to assist lower Income families. (110 Income Levels -Of Da 818,424,400 avnHable for funning, $34,878,800 reserved for flat time homa buyer families earning below 120% of the median Income. C(2) On August 23, 1984, the City 0sued single family residential mortgage bonds In the aggregate principal amount of 827,825,000, (tho 1961 ponds) In an effort to assist lower Income families to afford home oaaorship. Aj of June 30, 1986 approximately 819,946,086 of the 1984 Bond proceeds remained available for we. The following Information In provided will! ..p reReat to the 1984 Bondsr (0 Method of Distrlbutin "" Bond Proceeds - The prose o the bond were land buts to speoula participating developers based on their project feasibility, ability to utilize money, the housing type and the cost of the home. (10 Assistance to Lower Income Families - The mohhod used y C ty to GThe gtr buts t proceeds of tSe 1984. Bonds e� as descriL In (0 above was not destgaed necessarily to assist lower income fami les. To data, the proceeds of -6- / f.7 :0 x 19f4 fonds have provided financial assistance to .1 moderate Income families and 18 median Income families In the acquisition c! a now home. + all) Incnma Levels - A total of $17,801,201 Is available to mortgage Loans to those persons whc earn between A end 120% of the established median Income. A total of $2,211,882 is remaining to fund mortgage loans to those persons who earn above 12J% of the established median Income. the City has not issued any qualified mortgage bonds p':ior to the 1981 Bondi previously dlseoased. The City has not Issued mortgage credit certificates prior to the date of Ihis policy report. This Report is submitted by the undersigned elected reprem,tative of the Rancho Cucamonga. This Report was approved and accepted by the City Coutdl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at Its regularly scheduled meeting of Ilrsugh the y ad)pt!on of Resolution No. M", Dennis 1,. rtout, Mayor AT^EST, eS7y ut� tty Clerk , -7- /N L ,r r .Lr• -.I aa1 1. RESOLUTION NO. a4 36 � A RESOLUTIOR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C%TY 0-' RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING HOUSING POLICY REPORT OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA UNDER INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SELrION 103A AND DIRECTING ITS PUBLICATION RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: WHEREAS, Section 103A(j)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as acended, as implemented by proposed and tempporary regulations of the Department of the Treasury, Section 6a.103A -2(1), requires the applicable elected representative of an issuer of qualified mortgage subsidy bonds to publish, after public hearing, a housia9 policy report; 61IEREAS, this Council is the applicable elected representative of :he City of Rancho Cucamonga which City proposes to issue In 1981 qualified mortgage subsidy bends; WHEREAS, this Council has received a draft housing policy report dated December 17. 1986, and has reviewed each and every part thereof and this Council has conducted a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, it Is in the public interest and for the public benefit that said housing policy report be approved and published; NON. THEREFORE, it Is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED as follows: 1. The City Ms;ager of the City is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a summary of the comments made at the aforesaid public hearing and to cause said summary to be included as a part of the Policy Report under Section 103P.. 7. 14e report of teh City of Rancho Cucamonga entitled, •Policy Report Under Section 103A•, and dated December :7, 1986, is hereby approved with the inclusion of said summary of comments. 3. The Mayor of the City, as a member of this Council, Is hereby authorized and directed to execute said report on behalf of this Council as the duly electrl representative of the City. 4. This Council does hereby publish the Report by authorizing and directing the City Clerk, and the City Clerk is hereby so authorized and directed, to make said Report available in the Office of the City Clerk for distribution to the public. 75 i M: Resolution no. '- Page 2 S. The City Clerk of the City is hereby authorized and directed to file the Report with the Internal Revenue Service at the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, Pfmnsylvania 19255. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED I J� t / 7f6 s I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT •,rr. DATE: December 17, 1986 TO: City Camcil Members and City Manager FROMs Robert A. Rizzo, Assl.tnnt City Mano3er SUBJECT: Residential Refuse Rcte Review RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council approve the attoched Resolution odjustinq maximum rates for tesidentlal refuse collection from $6.95 to $7.95 per month for basic refuse service, effective January I, 1987. Bockaround Ttm three residentlo; haulers In Ranr4o �amonga are rcatrstfrg the City authorize a $1.110 (14 %) adjustment in basic refuse service. This s the first such proposed lncreaso since October 1983, which Is necessltoted by o 43% jtmp in dump fees aid a 5101 leap in liability Insurance costs. B +f theta factors have beer. outside the cantro! of the refuse maulers. Also, this proposed rate adjustment Is requested to take effect January I, 1987, and is the only regular rate review allowed during the next year. In reviewing the requested rate adjustment the fol6wiry four areas will be invasligatedi dump fee costs, liability Insurance costs, operation costa, and Consumer P „,” Index. Eoc4i of these will t&..e o major role In proolding Information on the proposed rate adjustmer• Dump F" Cats Sun Bern_ rdino County at the West Valley Solid Waste londFlll Site (Milliken Dump) has been experiencing kvge Increases in operating and rnaintenance ants; along with the need to develop alternatives for this site because of rapid filling .xd environmental concerns. These expen*4 and preparation for the fut au have resulted In the landfill fee being raisee 43% effective January I, f987. The new fee Per tan deposited will be $ &601 an Increase from $6.00 per ton. /77 9 � Residential Refuss Rate Review' - Page 2 This $2.60 I.crease represents a direct cost of $.54 each month per residential unit. The formula for this is as follows: A. Each residential unit on an average generates two receptacles full of refuse week!y. B. Each receptacle contains approximately 48 pounds of refuse (96 pounds per week). C. 96 pounds per meek X 52 weeks • 4,992 (5,000 pounds). D. 5,000 pounds = 2.5 tons. E. 2.5 tons X $2.60 per tan Increase = $b.. r9. F. $6.50 per year divided by 12 months = $.54 pec morah. This $.54 should be considered a pass through cost. Moreover, the City Coum-11 should be aware, $8.60 per ton Is a low fee for an urbon area. As the landfall site nears opacity and alternative methods of disposal are developed the costs will rise. A cost of $15.00 to $20.00 per ton within the next five years is very probabre. Usshility kuuronce Currently the refuse haulers ans required to carry general liability insurance of 5 million dollars for erw.h accvrarce, a 10 million dollar umbrell ants name the City as co- insured. '}s Is considered to be suffic,s n .t this time to protect she City and the h�-Iers from any accidents that might ax rr. During the past two years there has been a leap of 510% In the cost of this coverage. In response to this the haulers have Increased dedectables end worked on risk management and safety programs to contain costs as much as possible. In 1983 -84 the cost to insure a refuse vehicle was $1,193, while In 1986 -87 It has risen to $6,081 pc, vehicle. The cost per reJdental unit In 1983 -84 was approximately 9.1 cents per month to cover the cost- of Insurance, and In 1986-87 this cost is 53.1 cents This cost has Increased 44 cents per month. Operating Costs There have been increases in lobar, vehicle replacement, machinery and equipment; along with a decrease in fuel costs. Overall these factors have been stable, the request Is for a 2 cent Increase In this area. Residential Refuse Rate Review Page 3 Cormmer Prix Inax The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Los Angeles /Long Beach metropolitan area (all urban consumers) for the period October 1983 (index 279.0) through October 1986 Ondex 336.2) was an increase of 13.2 %. If the 54 sent dump fee increase Is viewed an a direct peas through coat to each resldential unit, then in essence the refuse haulers are requesting a 46 ant adjustment. This represents a 6.6% Increase - are half of the CPI for the part 38 month. A full CPI increaze would be 92 cents or o total adjustment of $1.42. (54 cents dump fee ad 92 cents CPQ Other West Valley City Refuse Rates It is very difficult to utilize a corntxulson of other cities' refuse rates to determine egsitabhlity. The major comparative factor Rancho Cucamonga has with the other cities In the West Valley area is that our refuse Is deposited of the Milliken Dump Site along with Ontario. Upland, Chia and Montclair. The Los Angeles titles to our west and the Son Bernardino cities to cur east utilize other landfill sites. From that {mint a can may be made of the three other West Valley cities that utilize cantractural refuse collection servtas, wtmten are Chino, Upland and Montclair. These cities have three factors in common which Rancho Cucamonga does not. These factors aret A. Mandatory service Upland, Chino and Montclair all have mandatory refuse colt -lion m"Ice; RartcM Cu=nongo does not. Approximately 5-1076 of Rancho Cucamonga residents do not have refuse setvice. It Is estimated half of them residents dispose of their refuse In a lawful manner. The other half ore utilizing some other method to dispose of their refuse, sus' as combining it with their neighthors, dropping It off ct a commercial renter (without pannls ion), or dumping It In an open field. This unlawful disposal of refuse causes an adverse Impact an the rates for those who dispose of their refuse In a lawful manner. B. City billing - Upland, China and Montclair bill their resident- directly far refuse service (Included an the water' bill). In Rancho Cucamonga each Mule,• bills his customers. The cost of cccaunting, printing, postage and processing has a direct Impact on the totes. C. City absorbs non - payment - Upland, Chino and Montclair if a resident does not pay for refuse service the City still pays the hauler for the pldr:ep. In Rancho Cucamonga If the resident does not pay for the service the hauler rbsorbes the los. Residential Refust Rate Review Page 4 The c . tnt monthly rate ad "best guess" potential adjustment for the other West Valley Cities utilizing controctural refuse hauling services are US fallowsn Current Proposed Adjustment Chino $6.3u CPI r dump fee Montclal; $6.50 $1.30- $1.50 per month L)ptvrd $7.60 CPI - dump fee Poncho Cucarrvango $6.95 $.46 CPI . $.54 dump fee (Total $1.00 odjustment) It is our understanding that each of the otter City Councils will be considering on adjustment to January to become effective .armory, I, 1987. The proeosed Increases stated above we "best guess" projec" -,z and do not reflect any City Council actions as of this point in time. Refuse Service Received Each complaint the City receives from a resident concerning refuse service is logged. Since January 1, 1986 the City has reoelved four complaints. Each w k the houlers pick up approximately 16,803 residential units, omualy this is 873,756. With the four co;nplonnts and the armber of services per year in 1986 the projected probability of a resident nailing City Hall with o cornplaint regarding refuse service Is 1 In 218,000. Respectfully Submitted, Ass!stan iii Maa!!ar 11 , I :♦ y I /I !a r ' RESMUTIOa NO. as— 3 G3 A RFSCLNTICH OF I'AE CITY COUNCIL FOR ME CITY OF L"ChO CCC'XMNCA, CALIIVERIA, SETTING MAXIMUM RATES FOR RTSIDENT.AL REFUSE COLLMCTIBG WITHIN THE CITY OF RMCEO CUCJKONGA WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cocamougs recognizes that effective Janaary 1, 1987 the County of San Bernardino +ill oobst-wially increase the tonnage fees for refere deposited at the Milliken Landfill site by forty three percent; and WEDUM, The ^lry Council of tie City of Rancho Cucaeonya recognise& that since 1987, the last adjustment in races for residential refuse collectiou, these have been substantial iocresses in liability fosurance costs, general operating expenses, end employee woges by the permit refuse haulers within the Cltv of Reecho Cucsmongal and WHAEAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bas determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and asnagement o! the residential r +fuse collection service v'tbia Ratucho Cocamongs that the maximum rates ue adjusted. BOW, THERE.-012, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cicznouga thatt SM -410M it hsrses for Service A. Bas!c InJividual Resideutial Unit rate utilising curb service auJ 'ndividual payment. , 1. Maximo nouttly rate $7.95 per service. 2. Maximum monthly rat differential for service north of Banysu Street $.70 per service. J. Maximum montbly rate for senior citizen $6.00. , A. senior Citizen stall be rnyose sixty—two (62) years uld, bead of bousebold, and bays a request with parmittee. E. Xultiole Residential Unit rate utilizing curb service aid Scoop payment. 1. Mazinum monthly rate aball be $7.95 for the first unit and $6.95 for each unit thereafter_ 2. Maxie uouthly rate differential for service north of U. ran 5.70 per unit. C. Multiple Residential Onit rate utilizing three cubic yard refuse containers. 1. Maximum monthly rate shall be as follows in respect to frequency of service. D. a. One service weekly S 52.50 b. Two services weekly S 81.00 C. 'Three services weekly $109.50 d. Your services weekly $138.00 e. Five services weekly $166.50 f. Six services weekly $195.00 Temporary service (lees than thirty days). 1. Three (3) cubic yard containers. a. Maximum rate of $38.00 for seven (7) days at location. b. Maximum rate of $21.00 for each additional service (dump). 2. roll aff container up to mWasna forth (40) cubic ysrdc. a. Maximum 'rata of $171.00 per Service' (dump) , hwever container shall be serviced (dumped) at least once every seven (7) dap. PASSED, APPROM, avd ADOPTED this 17th,day of December, 1986. i %® i% 0 AFFIDAVIT OJ PYKICATION STATE OF CALIFOttNIA as COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO I, Maurine D. Pagan doberebywollfy that I am the Legal Advedis:ng clerk of THE DAILY REPORT a day newspaper of general circulation, published In the City of Onta -to, County and State aforesaid and that the attached edvertlsm-,,c% of Notice of Public Hearing city Council City of Rancho Cacrmenaa was published insaldnewspaper One cis time to wit: December S. 1936 I certify under penally of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (Slgna ) Dated at Ontario, California this Stn day of Deeeme _,19JI& N,MMMWIIH an uwe� i! r� Y ' S(Mf P.O. Bcz i e RRo lane Cakfa to 91701 a Tekphor (714) 947.2410 December 4, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Attn: Mr Lauren Wes ersan The County o: San Bernardino is raising the Disposal Dumping Fees from $6 00 to $8.60 per ton affective January 1, 1987 at the County Landfills Yukon Dispoeel has not bad a residential rate increase since October 1983 Since that time our company has absorbed significant increased costa in labor, equipment replacement and Insurance costa. In view of these increaaed costs we are requesting a rate increase if $1.00 per residential unit using our service. We thank you for your considoration on this important matter and ahou..d you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, . RON DISPOSAL SERVICE JOSEPH AVAKIAN PRESIDENT JA:smrg J: OoOcoted to d,e coc Ues %, u*gh we uak cod In,& i December 2, 1986 Western Waste Industries 13M REDWOOD AVENUE, CHINO, CA 91710 (714) 591-1714 Honorable Mayor Dennis Stout and Honorable Members of the city Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 Attention: Mr. Lauren Wasserman Western Waste Industries recently met with your staff to review our request for a rate adjustment. As previously mentioned, the present rates have been in effect for a pericd of throe years aryl during that time we have absorbed significant increased costs related to our operations. We are now confronted with a massive increase in dump costs effective January 1, 1997. In that regard, we have prepared for your review the following analysis of these costa. 1) Landfill Increaae - 43.331 2) Insurance Costs - 550.0 1 3) Consumer Price Increase Over A Three Year Period - 11.33 1 In view of the above impact we respectfully request a rate adjustment of $1.00 (141) per basic individual residential unit utilizing our service. Should you have any quo tlons regarding our request, places feel free to call. Respectfu$lrJ Al Simonian Vice President sy AS /nd ?r.• c vim�! P. d. Box 1100 1` iA ifs Phone (71 ) 987.3717 •p December 3, 1966 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Lauren Wasserman - City Manager Re: Refuse Rate Review Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: The County of San Bernardino is raising the disposal site fee approximetely 431, from $6.00 to $8.80 per ton, at all county landfills starting January 1, 1987. Attached is a report from our accounting firm analyzing the •:ost impact of the disposal fee anl recent extraordinary insurance increases. Even though the report suggests a 16.71 raise, we are mod.fying that so.ewhat and requesting an increase in the single family residential rate if $1.00 per month with a variable increase in the other rate categories, all effective January 1, 1987. Attached is a proposed rate sheet. We will, of course, provide council and staff with any additional Information you may desire. Thank you for your consideration. Please be assured of our continuing i dostro to provide the best service at the lowest possible cost to the resi- dences and businesses in Rancho Cucamonga. �lzSv� x Very truly yours, x. RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. Edward Burr President ; :� CITY OF R.1::CHO CUCAMONGA PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 1987 PRESENT RATE PROPORSED RATE ` A- RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT: 1)Monthly Rate S 6.95 S 7.95 2)North of Banyan Differential 70 .70 ' 3)Senior Citizens 5.30 6.00 B- MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL UNIT: 1)Monthly 1st Unit 6.95 7.95 Monthly Each Additional S.95 6.95 2)North of Banyan Differential .70 .70 C- MULTIPL7 RESIDENTIAL JTILIZx6i 3 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS: 1 x week 49 00 52.50 2 x week 74.00 81.00 t' 3 x week 99.00 109.50 4 x week 124.00 138.00 5 x week 149.00 166.50 6 x week 174.00 195.00 D- TEMPORARY SERVICE '! 1) Three Cubic Yard Dins a)lst dump 33.00 38.00 b)Each addiational dump 18.00 21.00 2) Roll -Off Container a)Per each dump 150.00 171.00 y. +i. psp s�S;t ;.ri. �tSi��- 11�.�•, Wee havo assembled this report on dumping and insursree cost increases for your City c.• Rancho Cucamonga cortract. Your Refuse Collection Contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides for it review for certain o:.troordinary cost increases such as dump fees and inturance coats. This report presents an analysis of the liability Insurance increase that your company is experiencing. Dumping fetes are scheduled �o incroase to 98.60 a ton by tho County of San Bernardino. The net effect of proposed adjustments on a 96.95 rate would to An increase of 91.00. This can be analyzed furthar and baseed "Pon the assumptions made, would be attributable co dump fees .541 irourance cost of adjustment) .441 for all other factors .02. Enclosed is study "Refuse Rate Calculations ", which was made by the haulers of Son Bernardino Crunty. The inso.rance data used was that _ of your companyl accordingly, that analysis applies to the City of Rancho Cucamanno operating canter and has been used for this report. ■'. Sincere.V, M shall A. Paters Csrtificd Public Accountant /L 7wwAU a nan IMGSMll A.7f.C.0A AN ACGe1NIfAHtT fome Ooa teem MIIa� xsi7a GilIe17. AA 4676 AM712A1T7f/AT, 7UR7 Ili AsmtUlesn7Nt al ' TOYeaaW aseM. OA MAUNA aLL MY, CAU70UaA M21I C111114f MA1K KCOYIffAMli GUasA1AA70taA 01 � Q17)711.14M .Tn�NeUt A'NIRRAt.Ti Novomber 21, 1SI16 BOARD OF DIRECTORS RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. Rae Refuse, Rats Review for City of Rancho Cucamonga Contract Wee havo assembled this report on dumping and insursree cost increases for your City c.• Rancho Cucamonga cortract. Your Refuse Collection Contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides for it review for certain o:.troordinary cost increases such as dump fees and inturance coats. This report presents an analysis of the liability Insurance increase that your company is experiencing. Dumping fetes are scheduled �o incroase to 98.60 a ton by tho County of San Bernardino. The net effect of proposed adjustments on a 96.95 rate would to An increase of 91.00. This can be analyzed furthar and baseed "Pon the assumptions made, would be attributable co dump fees .541 irourance cost of adjustment) .441 for all other factors .02. Enclosed is study "Refuse Rate Calculations ", which was made by the haulers of Son Bernardino Crunty. The inso.rance data used was that _ of your companyl accordingly, that analysis applies to the City of Rancho Cucamanno operating canter and has been used for this report. ■'. Sincere.V, M shall A. Paters Csrtificd Public Accountant /L MAeitUtl 1. fensi UANe k&NnA%OA AN ACCOUNIANSY COt /ntUnON seam mum t/ne,A CPA 1676 AOMtWAY WAY, SUM 236 AWVftN WA"OJKT a(INee Nam: AC["YOF m ras,ewaawex.aA Au1nNA later. eAwogrw gem :AUgaeAwo:na p171!11.1/00 ak% OP Y MCOI Aen November 3, 1986 Environmental Health Services County of San Bernardino Environmental Public Ncrks AgenoY Attention: Jack Biker Re: Refuse Rate calculations Dear Mr. Beier: This report Ic prepared in behalf of ttie San Bernardino Disposal Association, the members who operate within the County of Con Bernardino end are subject to the Refuse Rate Formula ee oeoPured by Your department. The Refuse Rate Pormule: provides for an nrn•ISl review. In addition, yow• department and the County's haulers have cooperated In the past In working out any adjustments necessary for extraordinary cost increases of any one cost factor, such as fuel costs and dump fees. The Association feels that one cost factor requiring review as an extraordinary Item at this time is Insurance. This report presents an junalysis of the liability Insurance Increase that the rafuss industry Is experiencing. Dumping fe,s arp scheduled to increase to 89.6O a ton, and althouoh your department will review the Impact on the haulers, we have Included our analysis of the impact so that all factors requiring adjustment at this time are included in this report. .. In addition, this report presents for your Consideration, certain suggestions by the haulers for modifying the Refuse Rate Formula, such as the reallocation of the weight factors and the elimination of the growth factor. W4, suggest that the Cost components of the Refuse Rate calculations bo modified to providet 1) for liability Insurance me one of the components; (previously - Insurance was a part of all other Costs) i Z) Combi..e bin replacement with machinery and equipment •within the vehicle replacement eomoonenti S) Increase the weight of dumping to 19%. - Zry 0 November 3, 1986 Envlronmental Mea1Ch .°.orvloes J. Baker pooe -2- Ow- suggestion. if imolemented Would restructure the 1986 Refuse Rate calculation as follouai Dump 9rss1Da1 'Shift Re- weight R*YIAJRA Labor 29% (2a) 27% Fuel 5% O 5% Vehicle Roplaoement 12% 2% firs) 13V Maintenance 12% (1a) 11% Dump fees 133 6% 19% Bin replecoment 2% (20 O Liability insurance, 0 2% 2% All other ._..2Li -i23L TOTAL 1OOt -j2- The net effect of proposed edJustmencs on a $6.t1O rate would be an Increase, of $1.01. This can be onclYSed further and basod upon the ac.wmptions made, would be attributable to dump fees .548 insurance (rat of adjustment) .448 all other factors .03. Following is our discussion and analysis. Sincerely. Marshall A. peters Certified Futile Accountant /L i • :ti Novemy.er S. 1986 Environmental Mezlth Services J. Sake, Once -3- r Y 'S Percent Increase Valjev (Decrease) Percent Co•tr-- tcenent &(j /85- 3 /31 /ls6 Wright Amount Labor .52 .2700 .1404 Fuel (14.67) .0500 (.7335) Vghiole Replacement Motor truck's under 10,000 GVW 3.75 .OSGO .1125 over 10,000 GVW 2.38 .0300 .0714 Machinery & equipment 1.44 .0700 .1008 Malntonanoe Labor .52 .0273 .0143 Parts Automotive .79 .0225 .0178 Machinery G equipment 1.44 .0600 .0864 DUMP fees 10. CIO .1900 8.9300 Insurance 510.00 .0200 10.2000 All other 3.22 .2300 .7406 Total before adjustment 2,..0= 12,_tAaz Adjustment (1) (10.70) .2700 (2 aaa0? TOTAL V..'"){ z (1) All other adjustments for CPI factor previously granted Dec., 1982 - L.(•. -Long Beach - All item.. 253.3 Dec., 1985 326.1 Point Change -MA Percentabo 14.3. 75% _10, 73F, r Y 'S November 0, 1986 Environmental Health Services J. Baker y page -4- liabLiability Insurance wan fairly stable until the period of 1983 antl Increased Very spbstantially olnce that ti Increase is illustrated e. This ted in a letter dated uotober 27, me- 1986 from Crump /Kindley end Louooi Insurance Brokers, regarding the Insurance sort for Edoo Disposal. An analysis of the unit costa follower order In self Insure Genitors the scollision l trisksgof DiitssAuto PhysicaloDamage Coverage. :n order to compare cost Increases, Edoo's inaurano: broker did quota this Poverage. The quoted premium for 1986/87 was $198,702. The cost for this Povernoe was Included in the General Liability and Auto LlebilitY /Physical Damage premium of $185,044 for the years September, 19a_/I9S& and 6eptember i9a4/19a8. For the Year September 1985/1986 and September 1986/1987, the hauler has elected to self imeure. For purposes of this report, we have used the quoted premium of $198,702 for the year September Sv86/1987 as the tTi the Of the t of collision risk. By using the quoted premium, we have cv cosCos risk cost for rate making purposes. Any vorianoe from this amount will result in I•roressed or decreased operating Cost* by the hauler and will not be a factor in the rate making process. In addition, higher deductibles were written into the policies and aooepted by the hauler in an effort to contain costs. This Is another form of self Insurance and will result in added operating Posts for the hauler which will Premiums. be offset by lower insurance We have assumed that 30% of the Insured vehicles will experience a loss, tole was the hauler- experience prior to tf,e adoption of the self Insurance policy. The amount of tho Loss will va -Y by each Claim. For purposes of this repast ue have assumed that the amount o{ the claim for Ns ball period 1983 -1984 vas 20% and for thu period 3986 -1907 a 10% estimated loss factor has been used. � t November S, 1986 Cnvironmental Health Services J. Baker Paco -5- Umbrella coverage for excess liability ooverape is generally posted at approximately 100% of t`, total licbility coot. Accordingly, this covernoc has also lnnreeaed approximately 500% from 1984 to 1986. Umbrella coverage cost can be further negotiated downward in a soft Insurance market. The effect of this variance is that until the recent liability insurance crisis, the umbrella coverage was often obtained for loos than the manually compvled cost, whereus in the present market the manually computed cost prevvlls. Following to the computation of the estimated cost resulting from higher deduotibless Following is a computation of the Insurance increase. In order to compute the percentage increase, we have basod our computation on ■ per vehicle basis. 9/1/83 -84 911/86 -87 General liability(1) 1983 -120A 1916-19A7 Property damage s 500 s 10,000 Speulfied perils 250 25,000 Collision 1.000 �n Total estimated cost 1.750 _ 35.000 Estimated cost of each s 190.844 deductible It 20% and Number of vehicles 10% respectively 3313 3,500 Estimated number of deductibles 48 56 TOTAL s 16.a00 s 196.000 Following is a computation of the Insurance increase. In order to compute the percentage increase, we have basod our computation on ■ per vehicle basis. 9/1/83 -84 911/86 -87 General liability(1) s 153,n44 s 408,767 Umbrella liability(1) 21.000 Total Premium 174,044 742,304 Deductibles 16,800 196,000 Physical damage D 196.:02 s 190.844 st.137.0ap Number of vehicles insured 160 187 Cost per vehicle Insured t. ].92.7a 6.08n.25 Percent of Increase 510% (1) Sourest See Crump /Kindley & Laucoi Insurance drokers letters dated Octubei 27, 1986 & Uctuber 7,1986. ' , 1 November S. 1956 Environmental Health Services J Baker Pape -6- A revise of the 9ener3l 1lsurunce expense, exclusive of worker's compensation end employee ;ro1.P medical insurance, is that It was 2% Of the total vperatino e.(peu,ses for 1963 -a4. We have adjusted this out of al) oth„r expenses. Qymo Foes The hiAtCricel Cost of dusp fees for two Valley operations are tabulated below ` 8 /84 Dump fees s 93,280 s 142,235 s 177,686 a :173,240 9 314,002 _1613,932 141.045 214.339 265, IAJ 27 76P _143.1L — ZQ1SM.`. 392420. s•A`u Q1 aq•'.770 Total oxrenses 1.310,893 1.087,611 1,679,837 1,840,55,1 1,563,573 1.33g.j1,} 1. &61.0j 1,987,149 - DD2.nsn _X 322.E }js�EB. Sfjb, A7 449.166 }3.CA61986 U.1A 2.6AI M1 laa°.',,Qy Percentage 7.0% 5.2% 10.7% 1410% 14. 1;% O1imp increase for 1906 is increasing from $5.95 to 18.60 or a 47% Increase. Applying a 47% Increase to the latest year isohedulel above), the dump fans would Increase by !276,252 to •864,0.22 and total g9P011466 would Increase to 64. W..359, The ratio of limp f,res to tatel opormtln9 expenses would be 19.4% or rounded 19%. Accordlnuly. we recommend that weighted `motor for lumpirq expense oe modified to 19% Q ee�ass..rs _y ea v Novevher 3, 1966 Lnvironeental Neolth dervtce J. Baker page -7- The haulers are concerned about the effect of use of the growth factor In the caused Inge,. Wv believe that anvironmental and aocial changes have oausen Snrre*a*d costs which offset entirely and /or may even have addod to the, haulere, costs. The factors that they believe have adversely ■ffeoteel their oosts ere as followae 17 The state of California is rnforolrrr Weight limit laws, wltn prop ;blLlve tines. Thq �ecults upon the Ivulers haVa boon to re- roule and add sdditicnal routes so as to ensure adherence with the weight laws. 21 The Valley &,`ells are now so called fairly dense and the economics of more density of stops hmva •alminisheu. The present routes uuually carry aaxlnum payloads 1411ch approach the, crews, let, level. Accordingly, the paYlogdu uenr.ut be furbher lncreased. quo 31 Among the social ohanooq which bind to Increase costs ore that Asher reoelven more ffdnge benefits +, such as, additional holidays, additional ;nsurahcu benefits, *no wdditlonal sick time. The formula provides for edjustments ror the labor rata only and not for any o rnduoed Wrk hours. r) he hailers Incur additlonnl costs lfue to more olarn ups, mcre bin Aid rejla:emonts, more frogU*nt oleuning of the bin *, olfl%Sno decals on bins end painting of t -uok* Nere frequently. These, standards ere daslrebla for the Putilfo` convenience. s health, sof'tY nne Accordingly, we feel that tho costs w•rfeeted by tho above recta" offset any economics of growth and chat the growth factor should be eilmineled. i�` ,1 a CRUMP/KINDLER & LIUCCI INSURANCE BROKERS C1W Of The c rm cortpoWSe October 27, 1986 Mr. Marshall A. Peters, C.'A 4676 Admiralty May, suite 236 Marina Del Roy, CA 90292 Re, California Refuse Removal Council (Count) of San Bernardino) Dear Mr. Petere, rollowing our telephone conversation of this date, following is a breakdown of the actual annual premiums for package and vnbrella coverages charged to Bdco Disposal, Inc. over a lour year Period with the Pltrat Insurance Company. 9 -1 -83/84 9 -1 -84/85 9 -1 -85 86 9-1 -86/07 General Liability r Auto Liab /Phys Du93 $153,044 8201,773 $257,869 8406,767 Umbrella Liability 8 21,000 8 22,085 8179,421 5331,111 8174,044 8223,258 9 437,:90 8742,304 Years 1983 tbru 1985 the insured carried 85000000 CIL BCdily Injury and Property Damage liability limits for both tho General Liability and Auto Liability coverages. Their Umbrella limit was 810,000,000 for all three years also. The 198b limits were increased to 81,000,000 for the General 6 Auto Liability and the ' Umbrella is for 84,000,000. Par the 1983 and 1984 policy years, the auto premium vac based on a composite rate per vehicles $980.00 estimated at 140 vehicles fnr 1981, and 81,296 estimated at 749 vehicles. In 1185 the com- pany no longer used a composite rate and each individual unit was rated separately based upon 160 vehicles at inception. The 1986 policy is also rated separately using 187 vehicles. Deductibles have also varied over the four years for bosh lia- bility and physical damage, per the following. 161 UNCn 3ke0 SA0600 (05) 44440 Ccela 94111 rra fWAX, .416 916-M141 - =6132 19b IN f.RUAWA7l�IDIIR A LAUCCI INSURANCE PROUD$ Mr. Marshall A. Peters, CPA October 27, 19116 Page 2. Deductible■ 1993194 2984/85 1904 86 1986/67 - General Liability Bodily Injury Nil Nil 010,000 $30,000 Property Damage $ S00 V 1,000 $10,000 $10,000 Auto Liability Bodily Injury Nil Nil $10,000 $10,000 Property Damage $ 500 0 1,000 $10,000 $10,000 Auto Phys. Damage Specifind 7arilu $ 250 t 1,000 025,000 $24, "00 Collision $1,000 $ 1,000 N/C N/C Due to the high additional cost to include the collision cover- age for 1985 and 1986, the insured opted to not carry thY.e on any of his vehicle, and to self- insure, any 1088.3. Sincerely, Florence Higdon account Assistant /fh Oct Joseph M. Plietti Gordon Full,,rton Rd Burr 8' 'YYL Y f, ;l. ;� >. }t.. Y;i1I if4Y`t': •M> ,�, 41,.1.. _ '�1,. Y ...: •r...{ „'.i il(,}�y(: a CRUNP/K/NMER a LAUCCI INSURANCE SPURT C" of Thy CrLvrP ConpoNOa October 7, 1986 Mr Marshall A. Peters, CPA 4676 Admiralty Nay, Suite 216 Marina Del nay, CA 90292 net California Refuse Removal cou.uil (County of San Bernardino) Dear Mr, Peters, In response to your letter of September 14, 1996 addressed to Gordon rullarton, be has asked that our office oespile some of the data requested for coot fact,ra. The attached information pertains to the Basic Rates publsfuad by the Insurance dervice Offiue and used by most companies writi•.q General Liability and Automobile Linbility/ Physical Damage covarages. Basic rates for Jeneral Liability are 625,000 Bodily ln;ury and $5,000 Proporty danaq, and 025,000 Combined Single Limit for Automobile Lia- bility. An Iacretss Limit Factor is then applied to t.hnna base catse depending uror, the actual limit of liability selected by the insured. Automobile Liability and Physical Damage rates also hats a Primary Rate Factor applied detarmined by the type Uf vehioln used and the operations of the !naurod. On the attached shoat we have 9ivba 1•ha PNF applicat.le to heal, trunk /tractor* used for hauliaq waste disposal. A V nal factor used in determing the actual premiums is based upon tno inJiviival in►ured's loss ratio for both General Liability and Automc- ' bile Liability and Physical Damage Coverages. Theme factors can allow either a debit or credit situation ba-sed upon their ovarall experience. The same debit a credit factors are ueed on Workers Compensation modi!i- cations. We trust this information will be satisfactory in preparing the needed fornsiss for the council. Sincerely, C4 er Flo Higdon Account Assistant 151 Un1on Skee, 1 %Me 600 San konck C 00nio 94111 , 416) at3.140 ,16 967.,6., ,ntl�(6)964 -"41 ' Joseph -N Picerti ' ISO BASE RATES POR C� Z. GENP OP SAN RAL LIA8ZL2TY, BERNARDINO RE°USL, COLLECTIONS CODE 495 31 E�•l. 6/861 1.1 x I.L,t TERRITOR 7.40 ter, Y 003 9 300,000 '•' 0. $ 500,000 2.21 Y I =' 91.000.000 2.61 40 Etl. 3185, 3.29 2.21 9 300 .000 1.40 2.55 $ 000500 2.65 91 ,.000 4 .460 ,000 2604 Eft. 5183, 2.47 2,21 $ 300 .66 2.10 $ 500,060 1 2.30 $1, 000, BOB 2.04 84 .A60 2.47 2,04 II- AUTON08ILE 2.20 LIABILITY, 2.30 NLAVY TRUrr i,.�.,� Aae_�tt ORS 33453 TERRITORY 059 Cll. 30 /86, Inc y Eff. 0184, $ S99 .L4 pe`_•• • S 347 7.01 $ 300,000 Waste h... b 04 4 $ 500 0 •• 1b acto eel ° bona 2.46 41,000,60 Th... t Pesa 0 re hove remaineare our hat4ed 1H 4 core stunt ainee 1010f Above r III, AUTON ales, OIHLE PNYHICAL DANA08 ALL TERRITORIES Ctf, S °Q Prls• ' ! 42510/86, CO—=- 00.`'•4• 4500 Collision OO,O00 "' -�aa• $1000 $40- 15.000 $ 278 �`ed• 965- SO,ppp R 444 $ $95 .4 990,000 i Over $ 858 i1,422 $1.836 $1,105 .r." Et, 10 /05i 51,892 $2.699 $1,795 15- 40,000 9-1.561 $2,638 540 - 65,000 $ 329 $3,520 $65- 90,000 $ 526 $ 700 590,000 i over $1,016 53.698 $1,089 $1,137 �� Eft- 30/842 92.249 $2,777 $1,847 { $25 -40 $3,664 $2,735 cl •000 $3,622 940 -65 $ 308 $65- 90,000 $ 491 $ 6.•,8 Over $90,000 $ 948 $1.Iro $2.5.14 $1,512 $3,696 J2, 45 i° {`" • Note, $4,877 $3,63 N A Psi 443.}rw b[ Do al oR of 150 4bove figures - aPPliet to ., Parations. charged for Rat ua° •% r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Yroutil, Senior Planner Alor. Marren, Associate Planner SUDJECT: S'iATUS 0= FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN JUDY 1. RECLM'ff.NDATIONS: It is recoow..+jdeJ that the City Council review the St1Tur. Ve—W>- I! CSSIO mlast ei f interest y ul� no review the status o the ongoing Foothill Buevard Specific Plan Study. This report is to bring the City Council up to date on the progrdss of this important study. The following is a chronology of the activities of the study. Neighborhood ieatin a: On July 9, 24, 26, and July 1, 1986 meetings •era hTa UY t e s udy consultant and Ctty staff to receive input from the publie an hens of concern in the Footuill Corridor. These meetings were noticed by display ads in the Daily Report and by 548 direct mailings to property owners and business in the area. The information gathered at these n,:etings cas used to formulate a background report on the status of the Foo: 111 Corridor Specific Plan Study and formulation, gy ADeHO a n-M-9- Committee: oaw ssion. A series oftworkiny me:ttngshas "andlold to revie" and comment upon the pro$: -ass of each ..�,onent of the study. The public was invited to participate in Wk Committee proceedings on the following dates: May 27, 1986 the Consultentts neighborhood meetingspuwasr reviewed made at wed bythe Committee. July B, 1986 The AD HOC Committee reviewed the initial sections of the beckground report. i moo 0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF'REPORT December 17, 1986 Status of Foothill Specific Plan Page 2 August 13, 1986 The background report was reviewed and accepted by the AD HOC Committee. However, concerns were raised over the findings of the econwtc portion. Sept. 23, 1986 The AD WC Committee reviewed 3 Land Use Merna- Vves fat' the entire study area based upon the economic study reccmaondations. Urban Design issues were also introtfuced at this meeting. October 14, 1984 ;, preferred Land Use alternative w.s chosen by time Ad WC coamittea recotawnding expansion of tin caawercial land along the c rridor. Nov. 13, 1986 Cemsunity Design issues were studied with emphasis on streocscope plans rnd special intersoctlon design. December 9, 1986 circulation tssuss were discussed with emphasis on traffic volumes and levels of service for Foothill Boulevard, and street realignments for Red Hill Avenue, San Bernardino Road and Estacia Street. Preferred land use alternatfies and preliminary goals and objcctfves aro ettached for Couacfl review. Tre meetings which centered on land use and econoaic issues were will attended by the public, and AD HOC Committee mashers. However, at the last two meetings, comeltte9 attendance has dropped off significantly. In addition one comelttee member has resigned and one member, Deborah Brown, 1s nod on the City Council. R YtPU��baifed, gra Faller City tanner BB:OK:sor Attachrents rdJ JPBRALL COAL COILS AND 09JECTIVES STATEMMS !• �tS —R7 COAL: a-rd Is 9h .7uaZ {�y oon ouras that is attreot{pa of hf fa8 , :•aflaof {pa ° uuify{np upban design rm tF' prop {dtny Ql*,jonoatdallita,ro and residential m{mtur" o) oaxraro {Y Vvubla dential uses and Batting and aoaaoa. w {eh =af,r, effio {eTt. o {roulation a�--- 60Ab6- AHD- pplgC}'iVBFCTATSKr,N PC 2• Land Uee /gc =ic COgLe to sensitive a ivecally strong apattal organization which Se lenaltiva to Coumunity !laud use and fiscal neri , while comPPllmentlnl maJor non- ree Idea tinl Functlooa located elnewhore !n the City. OBJECT �• commercial the economic position of F00th111 Corridor dami subbrregirnalaccilraies, capturing neighborhood and larger_ecale within the conaeraints Planned developments to imposed by Z• Promote distinct! the east. are sensitive to hlctortc&leCharraacteristicesat key ar.t7vlc7 nodes etch ae thoso at the which the erly'fcotmA the iDevoteat Vineyard Avenue, ardtY to eaaterl 3. Freeway intersection. Seecificmplan scldynereaa" key sites within the development utilit!nqq to�aebure tntsgrattd building orieutatiun /lc0ordicni2ted accoao, g facilities. Parking and transit 4' Employ a mllarger uae elevelopment concept to reduce the P -courage rcuni Will o rvolapaa eRhile properties and oPPor�unictae for reaiOpment while 5, Ensure the gradual "Parading vapieerasua of undar"t {Z {sad - • }a+sa -abet }tae land uaeo- aa- eheea- Panaa)e "s�- }sad f++netloning at lees than t9elr market ++oteatial, Brat lyV,.. -2- I OBJECTIVES: (continued) 6• Reconff 7• Dpi In mechanisms eapterly a¢bareoa of .thePFrov' S11eaG to or. LIC existingebusinessosor the physical upgrading of FG IESx Establish ! • 1 �� hint ns.Ive comet rein orierte J Incentive bonusea g Foothill Bo al uses at Peazas and facilltiee ulevar k 2, Prepare Development Regulations and activity nodes eh simplify the development review p an. 3• Guidelines w r mixed use Bcearr open tIonsuoefmixtures minlevelopmente which rrotri �• Preserve nd buffering• mum lot site, Thomas a Brothers, Sl retaillsOOmercial (i.e., 5, Esteblis•,othete, Segamore )• uaea consolidatioenlforna allbOehe pprOgram of lot corridor if concentrarl encourage Parcels along the b. All nonconforming i Lion. to a l'!:Gur strip.•�oaerclal loss shall 7• per urn current City olicies and brcgulowe to continue as fEeae- Fesak4 the - D:vtm"lon of new rs rl°ne• 8..,_ Eesal3f dice bwineesoo with props ryai -pr "lotoretaila S• Develo eneras- ei- 0sioa Apia pea t.psaisea- Proveme� 6A8-ea arse -gee cluat P incentives CO encoura. era et hey activity !.e ep,ecla:. 3. key nodes, t7 commercir.l GOAL: Develop 9 circulation ayetetp ennd d enh ancInd the urban safe vehicular Fo othill Boulevard, en design N,J�:l. which facilitates and Pedestrian traffic character along IL -3- OBJECTIVES: 1. Limit vehicular access pouts on Poothill Boulevard. 2. Develop a mixture of land zasue which reduce home /work trips within the Corridor cnd City. 3. Provide for and phase neeesea:y street improvements to maximize the efficiency ct treffic along Foothill Boulevard. 4. Minimize vehicular through tr,tfflc on adjacent residential streets. S. Encourage the use of local transit programs (shuttle bue) iraleii- daeitkiiee whenever possible. POLICIES: i. Provide pedestrian - oriented amenities on: circulation features within key activity node) b,^ providing incentives to private development for pedestrian improvements. 2. Reduce inter -site vehicular '.rips onto Foothill Bculova.rd by requiring private developments to secure reciprocal access %xrwo. -z prior to development. 3. Provide for transit facilities along Foothill Boulevard at convealoet pedestrian locations. 4. Allow shared parking and access to facilitate effiatent •liew- Ler- uaiewa parcel usage and is minimize traffic support facilities such as drlvee, parking spaces, etc. 5. Dteoourage Prehibtt new cemmsreial and residential developments from taking any access trom local residential streets, by developing internal oirculation eys tome uhioh direct traffic froe surrounding residential neighbvrhoods. a.--- Beveksp- Leierari- eiweriaiiea- eyeio�e- der - large- raweo :e which- direeE- iraf36e- ee�iag- Greer- eaweeaedirg reeidesiioi- eeighkewkseb . 6. Designate selected residential streets within the area as local streets where conditions promote pedestrian movements over those of the automobile. �r. -4- POLICIES: (Continued) 7. Promote E&senvade the installation of a raised median within PoothiEl Boulevard in order to f.nsurs efficient and safe future traffic operations along Foothill Boulevcrd. B. Promote the realignment of Ban Bernardin, and Red Hilts ind- San -Diet• Roads in order to improve traffic operations and eight si'nat distance. D. Promote the extension of Estaoia street west of Klusman, in order to redirect traffic from Ban Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulavard. 10. Discourage the future use of frontage road* along Foothill Boulevard. 11. Promote the existing city cocoas policies as adopted by the city planning ooamirsion for parcels within the spsWit plan study area. 12. Establish fntersestior, geometr!o standards which provide for acceptable levels of traffic operations. 17. Promote rho development of Natachlta /FOathill as a oomplote 4 -way intersection servirq properties north of F0 thitt between Hellman and Klusman. 4. Urban hoe o COAL: Croats an Urban design image that expresses ana enhances the unique cheraoter and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. Prseate- tka- effiad *>+t- Cevcl- *pens- and- tiaely reviva3. taysiaa- rf- F�eukti�- Beulavard- 4Rte -e -tic }or eaee>taeatai -seaee case- rategal,tsd- ragioaaik5 -Sor ev�erLar- JeaEga OBJECTIVES: r 1. Develop a streaescape system which reinforces the xaisting suburban parkways as vehicular fv:eas and designates major street intersections as pedestrian 'y nodes throughout the corridor. x' 2. Provide P. system of vehicular gatrwsy nodes which °K announce and identify entries to Ecncho Cucamonga and achieve an overall positive identity for the vice&. W -`g- 1.)9JSC S (ContinL.,d) , am tr ,mti,atiblr .ui. lcg elevations which provide trap. If ,j ,.t pedestripn areas to higher elevationc whila protecting ndjoir cg residential neighborhood$. 4. Promote contemporary +a,ia.,pe treatments throughout the corridor particu +.il caoeo that are low maintenance, drought as- tant and able to withstand high winds and lute[ i w ban conditions. Provide for the ollminatlon of visually objectionable views such as outdoor storage and loading areas through the use of design guidelines. , )7 t1:- 1. Dev, p a .consistent streotscapo palette which Is coatcmporr -y yet sensitive to existing historical and cultural fluenceo able to withstand intensa urban use, ace i a$iateatly used throughout the corridor. 2. Require ool,pl.iano• a- deve4epew- ae- •eapiy with the urban deslgu guiltliues in plans for now development, expansion i redevelopment and make urban design *be reepeesiri �e• a major consideration to site plan review and pproval. 3. Utilize l d -iago materials within the corridor which are clean o ♦ird resistant and relatively low maintenaa • a we tal , rm and configurations should be utilized u as ec'. tty cores while lose formal, suburban type at urp ions should be utilizad throughout the n• links in between. 4. Develop nn ince -tivW program which rewarda private rector development for providi.,g certain '.extra' urban design amenities within their developments. Of particular interest are solar control devices such as building overhangs, awnings and extra tree plantings in parking to areas. Consideration should be given to special i!, ng materials used in place of aoybalt in vehicula a ess. S. Consider s waivers or other economic incentives for owners vhv wish to architecturally rehabilitate, u refurbist or upgrade landscaping on existing property �; but not vxpand. V� -a- POLICIES: (Coutinued) 6. Designate special landscape and arebltestural features at major intersection locations, combining thematic plantings with complementary arnbitectural statements designed to promote a distinctive character for these urban activity cores. Changes in paving materials, plant materials, lighting, s�.gning and siting of adjacent structures should occur at major intersections to enhance their distinctiveness. 7. Any buildings identified as architecturally significant such as Thomas Brothers Xiuery or the Sycamore Ina should, where feasiblb and if nodessary, be restorsd and integrated auto adjacent development. 8. Require develwpme t which is sensitive to significant natural landformi ach as the hillside at the Sycamore Inn site. 5. Environmental GOAL: Maintain the highedt possible quality of environment within the Specific Plan area, by balancing the impacts of development with r environmental concerns. OBJECTIVES: 1. Maintain the _-:1r-ca—mental quality r . ined At no less i than existing le%els in the Specific -!an area. 2. Looats precisely the portion of the Red Sill Fault which lies within the Specific Plan area, and the r establishment of laid use restrictions for areas udiacent to th6 fault. 3. Establish regulations which preserve significant eartroamectal features, such as mature trace and windrows within the roothill Boulevard Corridor. POLICIES: ._ 1. Precisely map the existing 100 -year flood zone limits, and establish land use restrictions and/or conditions for areas within the 100 -year flood zone. 2. Annually update mapping of environmental features, including limits of 100 -year flood areas. �P0'7 -7- POLICIES: (Continued) 3. Based on projeated traffic volumes, map future roiee contours, and establish land use restrictions and /or noise attenuation cocdi:lous for areas within noise impacted areas. 4. 3equirs mapping of atZ oignif loant Map on -site oaLetLeg e}gatibeaes environmental features •Libin- she- g�eeii}o Plna -area which are worthy of preservation. r-eweL -ae e} gaLiLeasi- b }es}e- features -Lc- ensure -tAe }r rroewtvai }o. 5. For development, within the area suspected to Contain the Red HL11 Fault, require a detailed geotechnical study prior to the issuance of City permits to determine the location, if present, of the fault, and any other limitations presented by geotecboical conditions. 8. Through the project approval. process and the imposition of coodttiona or mitigation measures, ensure that all devolopment within the Specific Plan area will not result in a decrease in envlroamintal quality, and will wherever possible create a hlghor quality euvironment. T.--- Tbreugb- taw- de *eisp,ees- rev}eo- Dreeessr- require -ibSt sew- duveleymeeL- }aearyeraiee- emLetirg- sasaee -trees wbLeh- nre- rersby- ei- eavLeg- Eibai- Lor- sbeee- trees -wMieb araro! i- adoquaso- beaish- •ed- atrueierai- LeLegrLLY -tw warrant -env Segr- w- deioroLeod- bY- •- QwiLiied- srberias�. 7. rnoourage the Prerervation of existing mature trees as requi:•ed by the City Trod Preservation ordinadoe. 8. Require that developments witbis the area impacted by noise provide 7uffiCiont noise attenuation levels to maintain exterior cad interior 01EL noise levels at acceptable levels as dofiaad by the City Development Code ataadards (9eoticn 17.09.180, doted Abatement). 9. Limit development within the defined 100 -year flood area to those type of uses allowed in the flood zone by the City, or require the installation of flood protection measures as required by the City. 8. Infrastructure GOAL: Provtd: a high level of putic services and facilities to all residents and businesb along Foothill Boulevard. a (D,!T y.� -B- OBJECTIVE: 1. Coordinate all development activity with the construction of public infrastructure. POLICIES: 1 Require that cll public services and facilities are available or that other finanoial arrangements have born Instituted prior to issuing building permits. to-serve Laiivtiunh- pvesrris. 2. Develop an Implementation program for tbo improvement, phasiug and financing of infrrstructure within the Specific Plan area. 3. Monitor utilization of public infrastructure cy3tems, and Program improvements to ensure capacity for future planaed devolopment. 7. Cultural and Htstorlcal GOAL: Preserve all historical and cultural resources within the Specific Plan area. OBJECTIVES: 1. Make cultural and historical resources within the Specific Plan known and accessible to the general public. 2. Preservation and enhancement of existing cultursl and historical resources, and the establishment of new land uses compatible with anU complementary to these resources. POLICIES: 1. R.aquire new project designs to incorporate existing ' cultural and historic structucee /facilities. 2. Establish land uses which complement existing cultural and htstorical resources within the Specific Plan area. 3. Establish a signage system or similar device to direct the general public to cultural and historical features. as y PoilC1Sg; 4. s. 8. <<oatlnued) D 12 IC • Yhio the 8P ci Of ° ura° Program t a�ltse aaaure °yell aDDro are,. and hiatrri aI Id in rasonrees fr°m Inc, ae, call ceder earthy of Pre ° °lt Ural otlihulldicg 69leeen all th local hi Bated, or oL4er„se have org'zq of qualitorlcal soci tho Soec .flaedSPoteyttaeatlficattosol ti aced 8neoir plan area l hlatorrp1cal ro ou cea Snt of signify Q=nt/b{ tnria Y{t ./�e,Qroye for dssipn r °aoure•e. °turatly uh {o,} e CITY OF Rr -ICHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 17, 1986 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman 441 / City Manager SUBJECT: Zone 1 Flood Control Advisory Committee Memberabi� City Council had requested staff to determine how may mmbers represent the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the gene 1 Flood Central Advisory Dwrd. As ve in- dicated previously, the Mayor serves as so ex-officio a.ember. If he is unable to attend, another member .f the Council may serve r -n that capacity. Tha re- maining mt- bership of the committee is appointed by the Board cf Supervisors. At present the City representatives are: Couneilamber Buquet whose term expires on January 31, 1987 and Lloyd Michael, General Manager of the Cuunnnga Couuty Water District. Mr. Michael elan series as Chairman of the Zone 1 Board. His term expires on January 31, 1987 as veal. The City is also represented by James C. frost vbo servou as representative of the area at large and not sp"ifieally Rancho bbcamonga. Mr Frost's term expires ca January 31, 1990. If Mr. Buquet is interested in remaining as a member of the Zone I Flood Cor- trol Advirory Board biter his current appointment expire: it oould be :?pro- priate to draft a letter to the Board of Supervisors indieative continued in- retest in serving. Staff will also check with Mr. Michael. we assume that he will be interested oa staying on the Board after h.s prese-it appointment expires. LMW:baa � r/ 6 Sa '. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/ FLOOD CONTROUAIRPORT,a" aZa�'1Jlt�y AU fat TNA 1ttAA1 • 9n 9amndm, CA 92416 -0936 . U141317.280O 1 December 10, 1996 Pile: 9(ADV) -1.01 City of Rancho Cummonga Post Office Pox 807 Tlanho OucamOnga, California !i1TJ0 Attention: Lauren M. Yasaerma•t City Manger Dear Ta.u'en: COUNTY Of /AN ORNAA000 EIY9104MEITAL R11t1C WORK/ AGENCY lie: Zone i Advisory Comcittee Membership W CHAEL O. WAVE EwA w in reepcnae to you- letter dated December 4, 1996, the Mayor of your city is an ex- officio member of thR Flood Control Zone 1 Advisory Conmitiee. The enclosed member 11-sting show Position No. 2, Charles Buq, .t and Position No. 8, Lloyd Michael, Chairman, are from the Rancho Ojeamonga, area. Aiso in your conversation with Jack H. Kruse of our staff he stated Position No. 11 (artm at large) is occupied by Janos C. Frost. Mr. Frost resides in the Etiwands area. All Zone Advisory Committee positions are appointed by the Board of Supervisors. When a vacancy exists the Clerk of the Board is notified. The minters generally serve a four -year term. Thank you for your interest and if there are any queations, please call me at your convenience. Very truly yours, Director MON:JKK:bIm Enclosure on noted cc: Jack X. Kruse D AILNFV I &,A at B Vna. •uw.we U,M1Cp JON71 JOTkiA l�n n9.v NRBARA CRAM AIOADAN , T,Ad D:.Uicl t r r,'- AmnMl.er.ttw CAL MtEIWAOI S¢e 0I.1Mt GUS JAMES 690CPO1 dare, Dtsyla intk \Nrk. Aat'CY AOSEAT NAMMOL. 0 nnt+.'t >f 1 ZONE 1 ADVISORY COMiITTEE OCCUPATION AND RESIDENCE ADDRESS BUSIIrfS9 ADDRESS AFFILIATION 7 VACANT Ar^_: (last appointment Scpv. Met 2 from Pontana area) i Appt: Exp: P 2. Cnwles �. Euquot,II 7944 OM7 Ared: 3ancho Cuca. Cuca=iga 91730 Scpv. Diet 2 9371 -08566 Appt: 02/25/80 Sep: 01/31/87 3. Alvin J. Musser 1721 N. Wilson Ave Areas: Roland Upland 91786 Dist. -2630 982 Appt: 2/29/76 Exp: 01%31/87 4. VACMT Area: Scpv. Diet. 4 Appt: Ecp: 5. Blake Jchwnn Area: Uclnnd 1485 110. 2nd St. Supv. Diet. 2 Uclemd, CA 91786 Appt: 02 -25-80 oii: -1570 Sep: 01 -31-S/ 6. VACANT Area: Supv. Diet. 4 Appt: r Exp: 7. Harold M. Hayes 4574 Orchard St. + Area. Montclair Montclair, CA 91763 Supv Di.%t. 4 626 -5894 i, PPt : `S ,._ &p: 01/31/90 Mail to: Council= City of Rancho Cuca. P.O. Box 8M Bencho Cua7monga 91730 983 -1851 Mail to: Investors Realty 434 No. 2nd Avenue Service Upland, CA 91786 982 -8801 Barstow Develop. Corp. P.O. Box 1947 Barstow, CA 92311 619 - 2563531 Set. 211 Hetircl Meyo,, Montclair I I i Zons 1 Advisory Coomitt.a Pegs 2 1 R1 b. Lloyd A Micha -1, 6320 Haven Ave Chairman Alta Loma 91701 Area: Panr3lo Cure 987-0207 Supv. Dist. 2 Appt: 07/16/7:' Exp: 01/31/e7 1 OOCUPARIQH I D) DUSINN51 a'.D ?E9° APPLGIATIUI 1•:ail to: Cucamonga County 9641 San Earnardino Rd. Water District Rancho Cuca=zm 91730 987 -2591 RE 10 /Pc i:.t�S�h.�n+l.• w. fig Ew Contractor 1 9. Manuel Lira 809 R. Turner Avenue Area: Ontario Ontario, CA 9!761 Supv. Dist. 4 987-2868 Appt: 4114/86 Exp: 1/31/90 10. Dallas Richins 1206 Haren Ct Area: Upland Upland 91786 Supv Diet. 2 (114) 581 -5439 Appt: 04/11/83 Exp: 01/31i87 11. Janes C. Prost Mail to: 3931 W. 1%wple Ave. Arne: At lar 12996 Victoria Avenue Room 1 -203 /ga Dist. -1127 ��9 2032 -4022 Apppp4: 1C/26/81 839 Exp: 01/31/90 RE 10 /Pc i:.t�S�h.�n+l.• w. fig Ew Contractor 1