Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/01/21 - Agenda PacketI at_ ,pC QTY OF s / C inNIM+y �QyJCy�i��7M�CW/, rpe' �p l,i..'ll l {yl��.s��lJlJltll.'1L C Z A MNDA UU > 1777 0 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Rase Line Road Rancho Commonga, California ,7jooary 21. 1987 - 7:30 0 All items submitted for tie City Cemscil Agmsdn nut be is mriting. She deadline for submitting tkese items is 5:00 P.m. am the Wednesday Prior to the meeting. The City C1ervs Office receives all each items. A. CAW •Ml ORDQ 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2 Roll Call: grown _, Ruyuet , Stout Ring _, and Nrlg6__t _. R. AR10IUMYM/PavmavavIMS Monday, February 2, 1987 - 7:00 p.m. - 1'0IM NESTING WITS SUPERVISOR MIMS TO DISCUSS JAIL ISSUE - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Ease Line goad. Thursday, January 22, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. - ADVISOR! COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Use Line Road. i' ' � 6 I N Y Y.' City Coumtil Agenda -2- Ca CON /YT r,MMI The follemiq Comsat Cnladar idr are expected to be stile aM mercomtraerdal. • Selr will be acted xpa by the Comacil at seem time Witboot disauaia. Any item may be removed by a Coacilmember to xember of the adieu for discausia. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 1/7/87 and 1/14/87 and Payroll ending 1/8187 for the total anount of 91,977,839.67. 2. Approval to receive and file correct Investment Scbedule as of December 31, 1986. 3. Approval to Release an Agreement for Postponement of CCQ's for Tract 13022. RUMUTION NO. 87 -012 A ttgoLuTION or TWg CITY conch. or TNt CITY Or RANCID CDCANDICA: CALIFORNIA, MISSING AN Ar1111 nT FOR POSTPONF1071T OF APPROVAL Or CCQ'8 FOR TRACI 13022 4. Approval of Improvement Agreement mad Improvement , Security for Tract 11833 looted at the northeast corner of 19th Street -ad Lemnos. Anise, and release Improvement Agreseat and Security approved by�Coumcil on October 16, 1985, submitted by toy Z. Daly Construction Corporation. I r Ri90LUTION 00. 37 -013 A ISSOLDTION OF TIN CITY COUNCIL OF 711 CITY Or RANCRO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPLOTMMT ACLLOOOT AND IMPROTMOVIT SICOLITY FOR TRACT 11853 AND RLLLIK TNI IMROVDMT AGUZKZKT AND SDCORITY AMOVID OCTOSU 6, 1985 5. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and teal Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for OR 86 -08 located on the northwest corner of Cottage and Aracia Streets, submitted by Mabloo Sampson. January 21, 1987 1 8 19 25 > a:. '+ r 26 i r .P s 38 39 :d if s i .Y r • .y„l�tr1 l` A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY , OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING , IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND ' IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12650 -1 � 4� City Council Agenda ' , -3- - 'January 21, 1987 r RESOLUTION NO. 87 -014 - .. • .. . -. = 52 " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of SHE CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA. CALIFOERIA. APPROVING' IMPROVEMENT AGRBCENT AND IMPROVEMENT , SECURITY FOR DE►MLOPMAT RIVIEN 86 -08 InCLUTION 10. 87 -015 - 53 A RESOLUTION Or TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT _ Or RANCBO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A - REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT nOM MARLW SAMPSW. FOR DR 86 -08 AND A97HORIEDIG TER MAYOR AND CITY CLEER TO ., SIGN TEE SAME 6. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 54 Security for Parcel Map 8902 (DR 85••23) located at the _ southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Ban lernardino•,, Road, submitted by Berry Construction Incorporated. - RESOLUTION NO., 87 -016 68 • A ABSOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL Or TER CITY OF RAACRO CUCAMOSCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING .• IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCIL MAP 8902 (DR - ; 85 -23) 7. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvrent 69 Security for DR 84-12 located at the northeast corner _ of Arran NI&Way and Stivanda Benue, submitted by - Patscheck /Rackbarth Development Ccapany. - ' RESOLUTION 10. 87 -017 -` 1 78 A R&SULDT:oN OF TER CITY COUNCIL OP'TAS CITY OF RANCMD CUCAMMA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING . -- IMPROVAOINT AGREEMENT AND INPROVRMENT RICURITY FOR DR 54-12 . S. Approval of Improvement Extension ,Agreement for Tract ' _ 79 " 12650 -1 located on the east side of Even Avenue, north of Hillside Road, submitted by The Deer Creek Company. RESOLUTION 20. 57 -018 83 ` A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY , OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING , IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND ' IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12650 -1 � 4� City Council Agenda -A- January 21, 1987 9. Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement for Tracts 84 12590 -2 and 12319 (Fridges) located in Terra Vista Planned Community, submitted by Levis Homes of California. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -019 91 A R13MOTION Or TEE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO)rAIA, AYPROVIIIO TMROVE MINT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IM GVZMIDT SFDURITY r0R III= 12590 -2 AND 12319 (RIDGES) 10. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and 92 Lien Agreement from Joe and Laurie Met: for 7900 Sierra Tiara UPS 207 -082 -30) RESOLUTION 90. 87 -020 99 A RESOLUTION Or TEE CITY COUNCIL Of TER CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACUEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEENT RCM JON AND LAURIE DIRTY. FOR 7908 SIEW VISTA AND AOTIORIZINO nD MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN TEE SAME 11. Approval of Real Property Inprovemeut Contract and Lien 100 Agreement and Parcel Map 10366 located on 9tb Street, east of Saunas Avesue, submitted by Starting Kinceld. RESOLUTION 90. M7 -021 102 A RtlO TION Or III CITY COUNCIL Or TRI CITY OF RAICRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 90. 10366 (TENTATIVE PARCEL 10366) RESOLUTION NO. 87-022 103 A RESOLUTIONI OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF ISE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A AEA. PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONaACT AND LIEN ACREDWT FROM STERLING KINCAID, FOR PARCI L I OF PARCEL MAP 10366 AND ADTSOKIZINO TEE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN TDE SAME 12. Approval of Contract for the Archibald Avenue 104 improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa re Railroad Crossing, north of liabth Street,, to Bruce Paving Company for the amount of :79,551.00 to be funded by Systems Development. c, '• , Men :; fir,+ S� r r "T1ir+.�4v�±.x City Council AEeuda -S- 13. Release of bonds and file notice of completion: January 21, 1987 6% 83_10 146 Release: Certificate of Deposit (Street) 033,630.00 RESOLUTION 90. 87-023 148 A RESOLUTION OT TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMROTWITS FOR IN 83 -10 AND AUTIORIEING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR 'DIE NORR Tract 12305 149 Release: Maintemnce Guarantee Bond (Street) $2,400.00 Tract 10047 150 Accept: Maintenance Gnarontee Eond (Street) 034,700.00 Release: Faitbful Performance Bond (Street) 0347,000.00 RESOLUTIONi 10. 81 -024 155 A RESOLUTION OF TIE CITT COUNCIL OF TEE CITY ' OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING 719 PUBLIC IMYROFDOMTS FOR TRACT 10047 AND AUTHORIZING 71X FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMMON FOR W WORK Tract 9540 _. 156 L Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 02,100.00 Tract 10762 ' '' J Release: Maiatemoce Guarantee Bond 08,225.00 1 i � • b . A t. t i, r s L r� �S r3 City Council Agenda -6- January 21, 1987 _ 14. Approval of a Partial Release of Real 7r.Lperty 158 Iuproventur Contract and Lien Agreement, submitted by SCE Development, Incorporated for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 9955. RESOLUTION 10. 67 -025 164 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMI A, CALIFORNIA, OP A PARTIAL RR45ASE OP A IM PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AMD IMROpEENNT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL NAP 9955 15. Approval to accept improvements into the Maintained 165 Street System, release Bonds and authorise the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion for the Improvement of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks from Foothill Boulevard to Baseline Road. RESOLUTION NO. 67 -026 167 A RESOLUTION OF TER CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANC10 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIIO III PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT$ POR ARCRINALD AVENUE SIDEWALKS, AND AMTSORIEIMO ?BE MINC OF A Bonn Or COMRETI01 FOR THE AEC! 16. Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public 168 Improvements and Dedication between' Task of America National Trust A, Swings Assoeiationi Trustae of,tlie Vera Tolstoy Trust and Conservator of the Andrey Tolstoy Estate and the City,of Rancho, Cucamonga for Street Prostate at-9686 Rillaide Road. L ISSOLMON NO. 67 -027 175 A RESOLUTION OF TRS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RYC10 COCA =A, CALIFORNIA, ACCITIMIC Y AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION PROM TR1 BYE Or AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST t SAVINGS ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE OF TIE VELA IOLSTOY TRUST YD CONSERVATOR OF TIE YESY TOLSTOT ESTATE AND ADTIORIEINC THE MAYOR AND CITY CLIURK TO SICK SAME " r s ti City Council Agenda's,, 17. Approval of Amendment to Lien Agreement dated May 8, i 1986, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 'j Paul F. and Cheryl A. McMichael to increase the 1- construction coat by an amount not to exceed 84140.00 for the purpose of constructing a variable height -d retaining wall. ' RESOLUTION NO. 87-028 ' A RESOLUTIOM OF TEN CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY - OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN ` MUMMY TO LIR ACREWRT DATED MAY S. 1986, BY AND BETWEEN PAUL F. AND GERBIL A. t- NC MICSIRL AND TER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOPCA AND AOTRORI2ING IIE MAYOR AND CITY CLSRB TO SIGN SAID 18. Approval to award the Contract for Construction of Traffic Signals at three locations, more specifically the intersection of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue; Amethyst Street and Baseline Road, and Alta Guests and Baseline load to the lowest respooaible bidder Paxin 4 . Electric of Lancaster, California, in the &.want of 8142,586.00 to be funded from Systems Development. O 19. Approval of sale of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue Property (APN 229-261 -64) by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Ter.adeu Corporation of Redondo Beachs California for an amount of 878,000.00. 2 20. Approval to purchase Tele►laion /P:deo monitor and stand F• in an amount not to exceed 8800.00. Equipment to be ' used for information resource, training and community - presentation purposes. 21. Approval of Insurance Certificate Requirement for Public 7orb and Building Pesmits. 22. Approval of Resolution modifying Planning Coaission Action - Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract ' �i 10349 - Walton. � 1FSQ.PfION NO. 67-029 A� A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF TEB CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING ILANN1iiC COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 86 -170 ' CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 10349 END TEN DESIGN REVIEW TRRSOF o ":li: �r•�ii `. Ef .i��A�r•:D' x`R, �.h i. f. / January 21, 19V •tai 176 I80 181 i r .i .e 183 185 186 187 188 s. ..r .Vi !�< City Council Agenda ismuA 21 1967 '- ' j .�v i 23. Approval of emcudnest to 'Exhibit A of Refmburseseat 189 Agreement pertaining to Dousing Bet Aside Funds. • 24. Approval to commeace atcdent istsrs progrem to assist 193 with Geographic Isforastiee System set-up and mappial; this activity is feuded throagb the contract service in the applicable assessment districts and will _ account tot exceed 02500.00. 25. Approval of professional Services Agreement Amendment 194 between the City and VL Systems, Inc., to modify std • provide time extension of mappfmt contract. 26. Set public bearing - February 16, 1967 - Approval of 198 intention to annex Tract Nos. 10627, 10627 -1. 10627 -2 and 10827 -3 as Aawutioa No. 29 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. InOLUTION 10. 87 -030 201 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY or RMCRO CCCAMMA, CALIFORNIA. or PRELII(IMARY AMOVAL or CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR MNEUTION 10. 29 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 " RESOLDrIOM N0. 87 -031 206 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or &ARCED CUCAMONf A, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS IMTERTION TO OEM INS ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTQMCE DISTRICT NO. 11 M ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID MNELTIOg AS M11EATION 10. 29 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10. li PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGRTMG ACT Of 1972 AND OrMING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING " OBJECTIONS TRERIM ' D. Ca6ENr_ORDTWCES i. '!tie following Ordisamces tine bad public Yeuiep At the time of first reading. Seemed remdispllre expected to be �r rwtimo "A aaw- ewtrwarsial. Ttiey urn H the Cewacil at see tier witbemt disceumiem. The City Clerk •'i, will read the title. Any item cam be removed for 3' discwssiem. x'tS_ RO IIEMS SURRITTED r /;,. City Council Alea4 -9- January 21, 1987 Y,• •.�: I. 4NFR1au FOLIC If4lDC0 TM following itaM been bean advertised sad /ar posted u .; public bssrings as rgefred by Iw. The: Cbsir will *pan •'4;; tbs mstlsg to receive public testlsaq. -; 1. Ep"LOQIA:TAL AESESgMEST AND OOESAL PLAN AM 201 208 ;y ES -044 - CITY Op RANCID COCAMONCA - An application to "end the land use elesest of the General Plan u r follows: a. (Parcels a.l and a.2) - Ties acres of land, 250 feet to 660 feet rest and 200 feet to 585 feet north of the northwest corner of Ines and 81Sklaed Avenues, API :t. 201 - 262 -28, portion of 30, 201- 262 -31, 41, 43, 201 -262 -01 through 25 fres Medina Residential (8-14 dwellings /acre) to Law Medics Residential (4-8 dwelling Units per acre); and b. (?steel b) 1.55 acres of lead on Maces Avenue 665 i feet north of Highland Avenue, AN 201- 262 -36, 37, fros t Medina Residential (8-14 dwelling units /acre to Office; i and c. (Parcel c) 3.90 acres of land at the northwest corner cf F•wen Avenue and ■igblaud Avenue, south of ,i{;• rr the future realigaeat of ligLland Avenue, APO portions h� of 201- 262 -30, 31, and 40 fret Medics Residential (8.14 Melling units /acre) to Office. RRSCLOTICH 10. 87 -032 228 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITT COUNCIL Of THE CITY +t� OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDKENT 86 -04A, AMENDING 'IIR LAND USE ELIMENT OF THE HIMCRO CUCAMDNCA CRNESIL ELAN TICK MIDIUM IOSITY RESIDATL6L (8-14 DU /AC) TO OFFICE FOR 3.9 ACRES, OPTICS + FOR 1.55 ACRES, AN3 LOU- MIDIUM FOR 5 ACRES OF Ij LAND LOLATED AT THE MOR'IEVEST CORIZZ Of HIGHLAND AVENUE AND HAVES AVENUE - A" 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43 AND 201 -263-01 THROUGH 25 s s ry�jf , YkY j11y + ll, r City Couccil Agenda -10- January 21, 1987 UVIRO0NENTAL ANSEaSNEOT --AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AWWWT 66-08 - CITT OF RAOCNO CUCAMONGA - An application to soaod the Development District Map as follows a. (Pastel a.1 and ad) Pine acres of land, 260 feet to 660 feet vest sad 280 feet to 505 feet north of the northwest corer of Nwea and Nigblaed hawse, APW 201 - 262 -28, portion of 30, 201 - 262 -31, 41, 43 201- 262 -01 through 25 frw *A" ( Nadlr, 0-14 dwelling units /acre) to 'bP" (Office /Professioel)I and b. (Parcel b) for 1.55 acres of load on Knees Avenue 665 feat worth of Kighland heave, APO 201- 262 -36, 37, ften %a (Nadir, 0-14 dwelling units /acre) to "OP" (Off ice/Prof easional)= and e. (Parcel c) 6.2 acres of land at the northwest corner of Moves heue and ■igbland Averse, month of the future realiganaat of lighlaad Ancona, APK portions of 201 - 262 -30, 31 and 40 fraa 9N" (Medic, 8-14 dwelling units /acre) to "Dr" (Office /professional). ORDINANCE 10. 306 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE Or THE CITY COUNCIL Or TIM Cllr Of RANCID CUCAMCOCA. CALIFORNIA, ANINDINC TEE DEVXOPNmT DISTRICT NAP PEAK MEDIUM alts (8-14 DU /AC) 'UJ LOW N 1DION 'W, (4-8 DO /AC) FOR 5 ACRLt';,0 OFFICE ptonaSIOWAL`' bp" roll 6.2 ACRES, OFFICE PROMSIONAL MOP" FOR 1.55 ACRES Or LAND LOCATED 0O TEE NORTKWEST CORNER Or RICLAND AVHffUC AND ,RAVEN AVENUE - APW 201 - 262 -28,'' 30, 31, 36, 37; 401 41; 43, AND 201- 263 -01 TNROOCR 25 2. AUIEOWINTAL ASSESSNOT AND GIVI AL PLAN AM0OKOT 86 -02A - LENAEIAN - A request to eased the Land Use Map of the Ceersl Plan frw Low Kedir Density Residential (4-8 du /se) to Neighborhood Coneercial for approaiaately live acres of land located at the northwest corner of Same Line and E[ivands - ArN 227- 111 -24, 25 and 26. 1 a 4 229 a 231 i •r r mat -. <• .�� l.., �� ,. I City Council Agenda -11- `January 21; 1917 i F krBOLUTION 10. 37 -033 257 A RESOLUTION Of TER CITY COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING V C ®ESL LAN ANONDMOIT 86 -02A, ESQOESTING M AMESONEST TO 711 LAND 1131 ELEMENT OF TER >F• RANCEO CUCAMONGA GLNERAL PLAd FOR 9.4 ACRES e OF LAND LOCATED 0E IRS EORTEYEST COEER OF U RATLINE ROAD AND ETIVMD► AVENUE N. c. NVIRORMENI& ASSES9NOT MD ETIYANOA SPECIFIC FLAN •rr AMENDMENT 36 -01 - RAl11AEIAN - A request to auend the Etivanda Specific Plan from CS (Coamumity Service) and IN (Low Nadia■ Density Residential) to 1C (Neighbothood Commercial) for 9.4 acres of land located at the cortbvest corner of Rase Line and Etivanda - APN 227 - 111 -10, 24, 25 and 26. RESOLUTION NO. 97 -034 258 s. A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF TER CITY i OF RANCID CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING w. ETIIMDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMm16mT 86 -01 REQUESTING A CEMCE IN INS ETIEAND► SPECIPTC PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY SERVICE TO .*, HEIGUOESOOD COMMEDC7AL POOL 9.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON TEE NORTENSST CORNER OF EASE LIME Y. AND ETINANDA 3. CONBIDEtATION OP REORGANIZATION AND REDIRECTION OF ADVISORY COMMISSION ESAILTIC ORDINANCE - The City T { Council Advisory Commission subconeittee vlll present C potential modifications to the Advisory Cooission Enabling Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 307 (first reading) 260 .= AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RMCRO CUCAMONGA. CAL IFORDIA, CREASING AN ADVISORY COMMISSION TO ACT IN M ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION 4. NON- IIC1.119I7E COKMTICIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REFUSE 262 COLLECTION PERMIT - Consideration of scatter of issuing ks a non-exclusive cownercial and industrial refuse collection penit pursuant to Section 66757 of the .,� California Goverment Code and Chapter 8.18 of the Uyr Reecho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Permit applicant: Rasta Rauling. r mat -. <• .�� l.., �� ,. I City Council Agenda -12- Janoary 21. 1967 �. FNtLIC aL[71CS Time fellwing itTr iwe r legal pahlieatims er posting rapirwwus. Tw [fair will op m the .eating to raceiva pahlia twtiarq. No TTIMS SUBMITTED ' H Q. C MANACa S SYAEr EIIOIit F The fellwiag item de set legally rgaira amy pahlic testimsq, altlwgh tie Chair way opea tM meeting for s, pehlie ignt. ` 1. APPROVAL or RBSOIMOPS FOR ANIUSNDT DISTRICT $6 -2 - 2E6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAIRAGE ANEESSNENT DISTRICT - Consideration of Amendment and changing designation of r As seaeest District 56 -01 to Asseeeeat District 56 -02 and setting of public hearing. RESOLUTION E0. E7-035 296 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITI COUNCIL Or TIE CITY al;c Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AIOIIDIRO ASSISROUT PROCEEDINGS (ASSESSMFAR DISTRICT "k NO. E6 -2) i 'Z RESOLUTION N0. 87 -036 295 A RISMUTIOE Or THE CITY COUNCIL Or TLS CITY y„ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING EIECUTIOE OF ACQUISITION AND FINANCING 1 AGREVOUIIS (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 56 -2) EESOLOTIOR E0. E7 -037 297 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY or RANCHO CUCAMGNCA, CALIFORNIA. MAKING DETE1"MOSS THAT CONMUCTION or IMPROVMWTS SY CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNERS HAS 'y`..• BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED ( ASSESSMENT '6 DISTRICT NO. E6 -2) 4 S�. 4 �Ai. 9y �•'h :A�FJAv r'tiaTi 1L'��<:1 G. {C eY�wAF. I H C City C .... il AEenL —13— RESOLUTION 90. S7 -038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY p, OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING RESOLUTION 07 INTENTION 30. 86 -93; DSMAKINC "• INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONS12OCTION AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN IMEROVEMmTH SOCETEER S. WITH APPURTENANCES IN A PROPOSED ASSESOmT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO ONE 1NEICIPAL i IMPR3VMmT ACT OF 1913"; MC LANINf. THE IMPROVEMESTH TO BE OF NONE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY IMNEFIT; DNSCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EIPRNSES TIMINDP; AMD PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE Of BONDS t RESOLUTION NO. 87 -039 i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of TEE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMM'A, CALIFORNIA, PASSING AND t GIVING FRLININARY APPROVAL TO THE REPORT OF ' THE MfCINEER Of WORK AND APPOINTING A DLT'E, TINE AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC REARING (ASDESAMINT r' DISTRICT NO. 86 -2) n' RREO.DTION 00. 87 -040 i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANDDCA, CALIFORNIA, REFINANCING PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND CALLING FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS (ANSESSMmMT DISTRICT NO. 86 -2) 't RESOLUTION NO. 87 -041 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OT RANCHO COCAMMONPA, CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING NEGOYIATIONS FOR SALE OP SONDE TO HE INUtOED TO REPRESENT UNPAID ASSESSMENTS UPON LANDO IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (ASSISSMT LISTHICT NO. 86 -2) RESOLUTION 10. 87 -042 A RESOLUTION OT THE CITY COUNCIL OE THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, MAKING `i DESIGNATIONS AND APPOISTMTS TO FULFILL RUP0313MITUS AND PERFORM DUTIES FOR " 3�SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS J&nwr7 21, 1987 299 308 e 5 a� 311 ^ 313 a 313 • �r t a+'tij Csl - City Council Agenda -14- January 21, 1957 2. RONTRS tIDCt SPSCI ►IC MAY - CITT or PONTANA - City 322 Council review of land use alternatives for the Hooters Ridge Specific Plan on 567.6 acres of land within the City of Pontaea, located on the north side of Susuit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek, west of Devote Freeway. i 3. COMSIDRLTICt Or APMUL Of ACRINKUT SSCDRIMC 380 '- PIRFOMANCL OF CONDITIONS OF DNPS.OPNRT - RTRIOR Of CINWA SDILDIRG (TI)GUTA DARK CRYR PmJSCT). a- 'J i. COSSQtlIa lgliR/ ' Thu following itunu Ms bom re"ted by me of the City's Csmissises. They are not cwsidersd public bossing itson, althowo the Chair my "on the sooting for public Input. NO ITA18 SDS1(ITTID 1. COMIL MINSIS r :r The following itso have bow requested by the City Council i for discssaim. They are net public Loring iter, altkmgb the Chair any epee the iaietfag for public input. ' «- 1. CONSIDSRATIon Or ClzknpO �••POO.IC SAPgTT COKWITTgg TO 381 Sg DISCDSSID AT TRg CITY 000NC7L RSRING OP JANOART 21. 1957. (Comium RoR 01/07/87 RRTING) 2. lg00g5T TOR • JQYNT MggTINC ' gglVgR TR' SCIM 383 r DISTRICTS IN T1I CITY OF RANCHO CDCANONGA YD TIE CITY 'A COUNCIL J. CoommicAT1on PR011 TO PNNLIC - Thin is the tine and place for the &mwal public to address the City Couacil. ,: r City Cewscil Agenda, 'V 1, Bwwly b 6thelet, City Clerk of tie City of Reach* Cocaaaap, hereby onrtiiy that a tme, asarate copy of the pd 2arepios as ran Poste/ w Jarsp `16, 1907, sweaty-tow (72), hwro Poior to tie aretiq Poe A.D. 2674 at 9120-C Use Line led. e " -r 21, 1907 .. .w a a A 1 0 1 a •1 Y S OVdZ q. O dOS1Yf O1•f �•YrPS•r�nNS�rOnwn ^ <� P q YqO. O �rNN•n. P.ypwNn•pNnl.w •fPMnddN .1 ^� °Y n <rrnn�w^rFiawn�nnnvn ^iii i� u . . 11 n Pni•PJ�N.<nf Md^ O..N Of • <MIPOwnnr. O ►FwNn? i N....nnfffff...�75 ^ w Q fr OJOO • --------------- O RO Rd-O O YO 00 4� ��R�RR - n7CRkRR J u 1 1 1 O 1 N NN NN � 6 Y 1 {^ r w n•w •.w ww w 2 Q r i R6 .Qyi 6yQiZ b N � WQO ZS Z 1 Y � J O 00 iW+ SOOOUO 1 u n` J J JY �� uJYYYY 1 •N �O( W �yZ n NUJ. V6r11•fi j QQ 1 P JwJti^ ,`p' nV..W UW_iW NI>L .ia wJC w Ni N; O L.17`Z LL `� pJ .`i Mi�`CaLYL •`y^•^}J 2 J 3 i�LL..o Yn : n;�Nif�N ►r�Hw< i «�.i. i <i.'c W i i � °zL rP W ¢s.`iiiis� °Ni`i<�i.°•"' s.Y.��.�sd � zWZ W a <WSUI: WLLLLLSSiur.^n�u..z a�^ •"1i N O OWf �` O {OJWyyO �Wr >y i)jt p)))i Kn � > OCIYj i OL.)VUOQGp� 2 >V3VAn >w.�•.=LLWrA t 1 N^ 1 N S SSh a< u V � Fop a U ^ W ^ VUS{ ♦_1 2_OJOO ` J <W j ` 6 YVJ M VOWQ <� y W S 6_2 Q SdY2ON > W WN N Wy 1 J C WiY J ` <W•. •) OLSSU- R.W..0 �RO6 p Y. NMCOYNrNOrw QwwQNYrW <UVZ JO _J ^Na W VVV <V <.....WWw ^AW V p 1y<JV 6 O as s i � .SO l2W S�iWw2. {{iLLyYV4JLYWOVO. _ >VO W S~IQ iOr <�YNIOi ..pO4i�� _ 2 <J J 1 J •hvw� J �WOa+iii l <r� rV NjNJ.7O {`O{` ii O {JJrtrn.Jt�iV6���ZwVUU 1 .Q.p6pY <NJrp <�VJW .•G • wl J OS.`.2� S A— zu.=iy u�YUVSU�Yp M h. al + r >^nO r^M�dMPnhOnnOdf •OnM1Anr6VgNP .1. L� ^ fe '.. nddPr inP.yinPdLnhv ^°.wnR.n 1 ■ :rl Y i�- `k s woaoowloo n�ae ow �w if �rpfo99 we +o9ioa FI M1anwrywNJSIONOSOnS MNIS wOwOwwSOOSaNU14nNN wwPwgO0iNi0 ^ � ryNOOnrdO rw.< +ate bwlwn .� wwiweibNnibiB � bi 0 lrarrM1w Yl -o..R� fro+ wbNNwNwnwJ'an ryr9ry O = ww r9wA i <� r r n ww N w r vY Nwr 9 r w < yppy S E SS SL R URR UM RM ERXSn SRFryryryryrySSA�SNM1M1 VM1N �ww�rrrwwwwwwwwwrwwrwwwwrw wwwwwrw ww www u 1 N 2 1 W L W W uii W uii W wN wN nM auo o J ov Je J e$�w. o ao no � YYg Y uU « �.Y YYS�Y O U uY u`u iiw> QWWN JaW62Y fr M VW ^MwNYUw {; w O�j frOJrr .rQy N p ^ ^ Z< t <O_JNW W NN:NJ�J 6iMw p2Y< SQFZ" YOJw NFJNw O.W <r.w OI .Li��4QS WNCwn S ywZ yWj p <Z <J WZNZ<WWF6 L. � y`u �uusiW.Q.IW �OpF9WW „�: `u oN �.°.iJW2 »s WI We,.r NQ JJ.QwwNweQ<•oe3 W: �n"'eN..N. c.<. `u :Nil<n w� T�ZrWWWNJVUYp W { :W.rW pQZQisWQWrQQ rF. SZWrOYWYrQi�� SJwQ t1 W6WWWUUWry4Wy 1 >SY4 S�NW.SWZLLJVYMWw O1. wYWwOwVW.StCpF2nwQ oWWJi QQW>WOaWrWt >ozJ.p >Ww`zWQpQW<Yn` 3 1 4> QpF. JaOrw> 0 ,.000NQjOPi.LUOLLL'+3pJ6QLVwLOY N J F t 6 r 1 Q uFi N Q�Fr O. V . UU V J N r j WW W Uy N V2f� y tip{i 2 i ZS i W�MNJOJW W ,1 U �J {W • �p� 1 J< O QWWppWr W'J Wt i ^ 2 >V2 � NVi 6 6 {F >rrL iQOir O M VOid6 � V�UWO efWQ {OY 6rr �� - �1JNNV F UN� Z< YYNpJ„ � .WN.w 7W C 1 `LVr4i22WJVA000WY�Z •J OS �W �. JU>iY2� 20 Ofr O<Q2rOrr„ NppWrwurwUWYN� S •OirJNOC• {N� � pWWrUO LFwrNWp it pU ii y Up 1 Y1. WQO � 6rWW {tNZ tr 2 <N p•NUO 6.Y <J �^ r 1 Q QYNUSCOYQrwW4 V <r JO C iy jW U_JL `�J •. 1 >NVO <rj�u�QJJJJ9W.YdQJVU V�YO.f�2 SJQYY�\ J 1 JjWy rZMWUWWWV tWWr 6WZOrUYJW. rwZ 1 r N{`N VVVVWYi.YLi�CLY.O`Yw0 {rr WQiYw2 1 <WWr Qt<V r•2•C wWwWW yy <W <O = ` ir0p .1W � OOOa�OWWWWW Y UUZ2� IVJJOJLiWjiP•LF pp n wl tl NNPNO9wnPJ dFNNPrnJPNMn dlldNlNrnrnr9NUr n � YI PnwMwUnM1bV$ �y riM1bwNn <PNdNrrPbrw�. w.; of T1.+ 1 NNM1bN J1.Y `•�N Nnr JJ rfndrn9wrnn •`JV t e i ;r i' 7 l� a { nI ►I'100SwPwS »rS ilAS.n «n P.. SN ►'wlwN ► n <1 iS'Iw- P.N -SS i'"w P1(r ►M.OIA.. ifO'1 «�.Y.iw '«f a!! hI1 Ur iN.PNiP ii^ ni1'I II 21 n- » » » -I---- ^ice V t zWLZ iWL W WtW W Y s a ! aaat aat a taa a Lz: i uiipnu o ^co o `puiN v 1 i 1 YYYY S YYY Y YYYL Y I T[ W F y Y < 1 - Ua Tn-WJ WJL W^ SI U �ip Y ^ Y LS tiSLLS iY.Y <W�u �t i NWN V2Lrp4Or1 .XS N6�J�VrW SLPCVN W 1 Y rairyNINI.Ni01)Ww UtFYVYTY f -M1�N ao�aNfaaiaWUaoyN. pip��ra..i i�rz -rcn ?58�N4i3.wNNVhYCr1wV�',NNLY1Na 1 Y s uo uu (+ cz .p .p V_ ^= V ac .Yrc ioo .pr.I.oiNi s i i s TNNiY Cf.W^ a s -6 fNLV UY< {at }WV ZZ.LJ^ t VV i1Ly NUp tr1 6JyN^^ fY U^ ^� < �.<'r. JVJL.Lit t.f•V a� ^nr. uai ac JY� L.`yy``'oa °W �[�uV.a .11 4V it J0 .N < ^wf cp I t ^p o.� u ^� .^N. N YWru ^ -u�aW WWOY zz.-We 0 o.i ai .'iri`aii6..frMl�(NlWrNN�Nr°nN Vprt.. »YalI.W.. WI <1 ON wI.N w «i iaf ^N tnYnV i ^O^OII P.. .. •1 »NN- !!- «iP'Igwl IP1««'r .IwfM1p« 1 a 3 I I V i'• s' 6, Y y � u ¢ as u o Qa t :a } s ■$i, J O + 00 .• O OS +Y +a94SYY OV n UO NKNOPOJOU O UJ + • OrYP +ny.Y +d nrap <p y�alr_YVd� P ♦.•p OY V +NhYwNO O PYM1ryr n .p PN +mow a0.•n .•nn r • • h nP -rp� �1• n nOp'�•rr- fiPO•eirnOO�Nn +Yar V Purn ++++++rYYYYaYNYYYaaaaaaaaJanr^ oti•ioouryp -------------- .. .. — - - N.....n. n w.n..• � w w:: w.N..N. w.n. w.n. w.n..N. w.n. w.h..N..NinM1.h. -.N..N..n. w N w.N..h. o Yin ai+aa z i a Y v rn.•M1 •^`• Q r6^ U Q ^6r G 6 J L U Z lJ O U ZU O i1 ry ¢0�3: Qr �.� W¢ �i •`eoo z ao � Y Z wI •� MU Z W�NZJ W•YnyWN 1 V PV d V Di.V2QJUZWy6 i•¢[4V U < O OuV } ^YpWJ >ppu iFM a < W � O ^J r CW y V s u - ¢ ¢ s.<. Nzp iu Z7 2t. 2uW N<U JS _ VV •p+aSa W <4N YV� V �< I <N �r �•[<�Ww� pa¢ L O J< Ni r.7 ^rV SJ> J V OJ U ¢ QWSNNJrWQJWWW W J U VJ L p2WNJ 6 • J •}i• Y to U T p •<Ji ¢WO_rTQYS SJ i J ^ <SNwZNaNaZNn�l •¢�• i 3i � Hsu «rrW"dW «J a OWV =NNWO >oYwN« r N Nh Y n +�+ ^fin +rVPa ^YN +a P ^ V^ M • hP JrN 6 it rrmWrn J•n1r+ dPr a o t - / J V3 V NO J= ^ N u�! < Z :Y ro PJ o NN YrQN ^i JOWWrJWW VV�iYrV �C OJQ <WO< �W<J3 u6iuJ u¢uu i Ls V u V J }N O L6M UN�J 4 Z� }W Nrr u W:3SN :< O < »W4aJi0 � <U�JJ <LO <raas<s <-• SnnP�Par_ rr� riW�r r i r r (t. \t, a N 1 W d s ¢ i .l u M � V ¢ • V i V 4 s 'a i ¢1 I d j)Y�V^ 41 L9�rT�� ^lIp � °e1Y- n °o+°. °4o °°vo ug onY�no.° -mow °o nga� °4u�no.M1i�o °n no�°.rn�n •••• ANON ^Yhr.'Pnn.�o NOONfwVF40.�V.P^O «^�o�^� Y�VPNn ^O^ wO n./Y..r Ynwryww 4NYw n N Y P P 4 •. .. J w N n n N11. FrVl OrNnoI�WY�OP lilPPPPlPOOUOO4U00�•°. •«••Ni^ M1-- NM1N -NryhNN YNNM1hNNNhNNNNNNryryNNhhhNNNFNNNNhNhNM1hhM1 s i t :zzz c z z Q izsz z z uz zp c W u uone v 0 7$ ii tt3 y y y yyyy y y wy :;� ^ ii pQa °" uui - .Q.- Nn12NW�VN r NNMp O SNVNO " N W••'• N.0 -•'iV - r.JiQEIt�� \J<JJt« V <.. OJ .(.J. uNas`a�JppiJZ.rcNpuy ° °. a... «.....NU u¢ - °�u °`E�NUrYWah°Y «Q Pry °4°JN4�.y+��..°u JW jr0`S� y .N•.6nV i N \••2rWYNQ23i WZi t yyyr� FuJJJ4�pyOyyEQNWQ�J�Q Jr.y Jw W.+JJ ���yWW�4W2u •QijtNnl6WruWOUr- �N.Yi1 .OiI Wyy WPWWQw1U1Uu yF•J Wr EJr64J�¢ V¢- Vw.�2•Or¢QEWEVrJ6J¢bP¢pp¢¢w9¢¢ Vu U Y VC • i � V VZ lW \J OQN W � G OF 6u1. . ° a Y S.PiQ>VO Q n iV Wu •ViN .V• 'y .U•+ biz S OOQ OQ < U uON«QZ< ZWw pNyNM JJ�QL yWJV•. nU V.IiW Z >OEOI•.Y W•.r NN Wao° au zl _ °Wr NIaWZQ .aWrolz rQ .yr.:szW.,W �wrrWS r� 2: 1.3 u pw sWWW¢.�zzW uo «.Wl . W i 4l z zJ4W. °F JWr zz.u��sWr u W >W.r¢zz «I. J �`iu�W\rQ >ir>°>.l2 zp J•�> z4[f4WWWyrN V'• NVyUVpVVyVJUVyY1VWWW52 W =�QSVSuJ 1U O.. J.• nrN «YM« «'� {^VMNyV VYnF�o�lf ••n OOV Onf IVY�ryPM1V�Y F 4rYnf .1 YInOP nJrrrr�rnrr Vn Y V ry I z M a_ r.0'IO YUMOPg09 OUOOOngOVNO00 UOOd Y9991aO �I.. •� ..00 n C. Ivry ywa00I�aOJrNOJUyNI�P .�J4PJaNNrOYraN }arOOr n7n .- rrrnPrwrw.Yr�,o,N 1 i� U •I l4arOM0 wN nrN .•I.q VwNnrl.JrrPOwNn•fNaw rPOwNnr iI I- YNM1M1NNN «N- NNM1NnNry NN------ NNNryhryM1NM1N ,°r= . rrNNN- N.N•Nw.Ni..w.N•.Ni.NiN w. Nipry.•..Nirvi.M1.�www.rvwwwwwww.Ni .Ni w.M1iw wNw.Ni li`i V I Q W wz a W V < h c c i ii i1s.IQi Q Y I N i < VV VSZUPI Z IL ,p O ✓. t J _OOJIIO Q JM1 • y N V N NUVMJ 4 NNN p O � ry T.Ti V < < > W�V W L O W ....Q ..I �W r� Q JJn. .-IN UOWr Q V V W.N•. 21 r LLY aVW _ Y MryNy ^ Or VrUSN�Nr OOt O=NNN6 UI <QOY 4NN�Nf 3 NN N Lf MrrO UWr.. {YN� UVYNV=QVVrV�VUVOW�VyV� VLLNrQO1QULW0002 < LI TaOwW ►} .+} W Q..rr 00 00 <OY00..0 JO <OYaO «¢7L {gWf064S1JVr �Ij.{Q ss<rOW jS Nn��j }jju- < >'SJ -JW yaaJ ^r•O.tn�a�40LJtif {WW .. F..W <WSWrn a>W..Q WYVUJ <NN WV OrrW6n6Jn.[U y.ia¢u¢..a Q dW..ry iT.°.c nubi:b SWwJ4< QQJi¢i 6.Y wSV Q..QVrdr < d u u Tr sr u fu i Nz I Yi Jr Or w O 6 VS U �2 ar N i iu �� `u2• s �i � FJ zo Wi Q ; z N p� .i.LL SOY 3 MWY..<iu Oiii W 36 Qli 62 `1 .� Q rJ .] V < < ..00¢WVJ V I II��UJ6QWVUw rWJ� } N <u6iN YiVL W.2.S <¢ Z}< JJF VVS«.Y Q NjryJ •',�� o Zd..iWZOO.+Q UO OY US <rWUy6 q N •>V Qf{ wJSW zJ ....WW M O i dN arNN z }dur w-r � ao z" zN► .. <r¢QQ 1� a° :r x E i z :r¢ s Sind » <z <WWF.d � WsNZrd i�rdrQ.. �[fz WZ�T< < zru}dnWUSS yLL y'� VJVOJ�i .IJtYJ O W2 ZYi�a wSiM< <r2201�O��QU¢rVQ¢uN } I }•uI al aJNL"PIrnYrd.. M1JTY. 14�p }2T 2 nnPnNNryr r V g .w.N<Nw }aOwN J VaL Jwya owrPrnonwT raM1rnwrnrraw rwrwrrv�r ,�i � ?: A >'i'°•a1.71:b�� +. r; a ft ;•,. Mp 4" •kT. -t 4..: � :�^ I r' V I I .•I •y0000^n00 ^OOP400YOON000a VV Oa O.]ONV000OhY•p VONJNOyNV .� •.1 • P PIN..Niw � a1 -- VYw� }�Pr w.YiwN -nhrGy r. 1 S a V 1 OwlianwyPlV � i wnnvN ^QPO ^N n.fNa ^OP aaWaaa�aaan ¢I ^ ^.. 1. ^I.N nn ryNNNryNNnNryNN my--- • l�ly.Niww -------- w NN.NiN.y �rin ^�^.niw ^�.I ' 1 .Ni - r Y 1 M s, Js YN•�u u ar Nu u 1 i Wir.I y .io u oun � IN.0 �i as ❑far Q ua 1I St �t NNN w ^T ^NNwNN • ^ON�QNO� N t.wNN pNw O_NFpNN ..Id ..GWaa ^tarp JaJN S j{y=z VVJV it {O.NIINYVLVY�QVViy5 yu2z 4paiT�i �Q6JLL¢PNQyy� OYLLVLr S G 1 y .0 V^ SQ O uW 1 1 U N t7 V �S �Q 1 O ¢•^� NN9V w N�'J ¢JUii �.Q _ � �i y{•r' a ¢ p aw Iy.y 1 ¢� {O�OriC�StatMWNO�Wi2 -I-ILL Oi SUO}•'^ ^YN }WWJWWYJi` VWN } <tL U CWNNYUrwO FNi 1 t ^GG Nwyw ^I{lN QauJ ^ ^F{ : YQ`4z 4' ^� I QNWaW Q{}I.,}JSJM¢JJ�t = {W)[t QU "41°IIi IR JAI• _ � Yap }3Y � +T•��w1- ^JJQ�Q <i¢Q I �•W I rN �,�1 w:{' {iMNInNJ ^�L�NYIpOYMTIt�Yi � �q" V I:p ►;� I.aaJiM}Y V ^N P'•P•VOnr..t nNPn01.0 nONnrPN }h YV.0 PPVNn..r }NaM1.-OhOY '-III ,Iy 1 nr Yr.f 1. nl. Yal.'awnaNN} 1' -'� .y I/ il,Y01'i•'yA<�•i•�t1 •.1 '•r�'i'l' ���hV (wV ILy.O.i^.'el %.` {rl1!•i.`.� ji�.�f X'lRlf :Jt IYII. !n!- wwTL _! r' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM -..,. BATE: January 21, 1987 1977 TO: Mayor and KWers of the City Council FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director /Deputy City Treasurer ' SUBJECT: Receive and pile - City of Rancho Cucamonga lwtstment Schedule Status Report as of December 31, 1986. ' f CITY Op WISIMSST SCSEDULS IAM COCAKKA RSFOST STATUS _ PURCRASE MATURITY INTEREST INSTITUTION VAT9_ _g M— APOONT u :R _ _t bank of America 03 -19-86 01 -02 -57 300,000 0.06875 Security pacific Satiinal 10 -16 -86 01 -12 -87 500,001 U.05250 Bank of America 07 -15-86 01 -12 -87 100,000 0.06175 Bank of Southern California 07 -17 -86 01 -13 -87 100,000 0.07000 Foothill Independent Bank 12 -22 -86 01 -21 -87 349,157 0.05050 Security Federal Swings 02 -28-86 01 -26 -87 100,000 0.09500 Merit Sav inga Bank 03 -03 -86 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.08500 Royal Oak Sav inga 6 Loan 03 -03 -86 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.08175 Upland Naticoal Bank 01 -27 -86 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.08500 Equitec 01 -27 -86 01 -27 -87 100,000 0.08800 Capital Bank 01 -29-86 01 -29-87 100,000 0.09250 ' Z, Pal S i+ w' f t F;. :. =Yn �r.µy.YY�r19.' ir' .` u e= . _ r _ • a. r r.� r�TJi� Iweablest Status Report Fate 2 - - �. „ 70RCLLlE MATURITY IIIEIIii FAIR MW.St IKR7m 1 DATIC_ DATT AMOUNT RATS_ tILOE ' Mitsubiald - Loa Angeles 12 -15-86 01 -30-87 1,000,000 0.06300 RCountry S.ninds lank 01 -31 -86 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09500 100,000 So. Calif. Savings 6 Loan 01 -31 -66 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09150 100,000 United Misrabi Ant 12 -05 -86 02 -03 -87 100,000 0.06300 _ _ Eel -Air Savings 6 Loan 02 -04-86 02 -04-87 100,000 0.09250 Westport Sn iota lank 02 -05-36 02 -05-87 100,000 0.08750 c• racily Savings 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 02 -06 -37 100,003 0.08750 California Federal 07 -16 -36 02 -09-87 1.00,000 0.06400 y Rancho lank 02 -13 -66 02 -13 -67 100,000 0.09000 Golden Pacific Swings 02 -14-86 02 -17 -87 100,000 0.06750 Gold liver Savings 6 Loan 02 -14-86 02 -16-87 105,000 0.08750 Secure Savings 6 Loan 02 -19-96 02 -19-67 103',000 0.09000 Gibraltar Savings 6 Less 02 -14-35 02 -20-57 100.000 0.10250 100,000 ` Del Av Savings 6 Loan 06 -26 -66 02 -23 -87 100,000 0.07250 Coast 3wings 6 Loan 08 -21 -86 02 -23 -87 100,000 0.07000 r South Say Swings 6 Loan 02 -25-86 02 -2547 100,000 0.08750 • Mt. Whitney Swings 6 Loan 02 -25-86 02 -25-87 100,000 0.08750 Guaranty Swings 6 Loan 02 -25-06 02 -25-87 100,000 0.08700 Century City Savings 6 Loan 02 -26 -86 02 -26 -37 100,000 0.08750 Mercantile lank 02 -26-86 03 -02 -87 100,000 0.08500 100,000 First 8avinta 6 Loan 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 100,000 0.09000 ' Aouthvest lank 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 500,000 0.01850 5 University Swings 03 -03 -86 03 -04-87 100,000 0.06750 Guardian Savings 6 Loan 09-03 -66 03 -04-87 100,000 0.06400 :4 hentu"d Swings 6 Loan 03 -04-86 03 -04-67 100,000 0.087;0 r �} t. • r r4- y. r> Investment Status Report Page 3 Commercial Pacific Savings 03 -04-86 Onion Federal Saviuga 03 -04-86 La Jolla Village Sank 03 -04-86 Manhattan Sank Savings 03 -05-86 Guardian Federal Savings 03 -05-86 Western Family Sank 03 -06 -86 Westco Savings Sank 03 -11 -86 Alvarado Sank 03 -12 -56 Valley National Sank 03 -12 -86 Bank of America 03 -13 -86 Sun Savings 6 Loan 03 -16-66 San Diequito National Sank 03 -15-86 California Security Bank 03 -21 -86 Wilahire Center Bank 03 -24-86 Huntington National Bank 03 -25-86 Atlantic Financial $"Inge 03 -25-86 Merchant s Bank 03 -25-86 Consolidated Savings 03 -26 -86 Lincoln American Savings 03 -26 -86 City Thrift 6 Loan 03 -26 -86 Saratoga See toga A Loan 03 -26 -85 United American Bank 03 -26 -86 Golden Pacific Bank 04 -03 -b6 Bank of America 10 -17 -86 MATURITY IMTERRST DATL AHOUWT _ RATS 03 -04-67 03 -04-87 03 -04-67 03 -05-87 03 -05 -87 03 -06 -57 03 -11 -57 03 -12 -67 03 -12 -67 03 -13 -67 03 -18-67 03 -18-87 03 -23 -87 03 -24-67 03 -25-57 03 -25-67 03 -25-87 03 -26 -87 03 -26 -57 03 -26 -87 03 -26 -87 03 -26 -67 0/ -03 -87 04-15 -87 /0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,0,10 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 17.000 100,0CA 530.000 0.08625 0.08500 0.08500 0.08750 0.08500 0.08375 0.08750 0.08250 0.08100 0.07125 0.08750 0.08250 0.08250 0.08125 0.082.1 0.08375 0.08250 0.08250 0.08150 0.09250 0.08250 0.08000 0.08000 0.05500 e FAIR WRIT � TALUS 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 .. .V e �bL Investment Status Report Pate 4 INVESIXINT PURCRASE —"M— MATURITY DATE_ AMOUNT IRTIREST LTE Matsui Manufacturers lank 12 -05-86 04 -16 -87 100,000 0.05650 Newport - Balboa S 6 L 10 -20-96 04 -20-87 100,000 0.06350 Palm Springs Swings Bank 10 -20-96 04 -20-87 100,000 0.06000 Chino Valley Bank 10 -201-86 04 -20-87 100,000 0.05500 Butterfield S 6 L 04-22 -86 04 -22 -8: 99,000 0.08000 Irvine City S 6 L 10 -24-86 04 -22 -97 100,000 0.06375 Deauv isle Sav rots Bank 04 -22 -86 04 -22 -87 100,000 0.07075 Mutual S 6 L Assoc. 04 -24-86 04 -23 -87 100,000 0.07000 Mercury Savings 6 Loan 04 -24-96 04 -24-87 100,000 0.07250 Malaga Savings 6 Loan 01,24 -16 04 -24-87 100,000 0.07375 Adobe Swings 6 Loan 04 -24.96 04 -24-87 100,000 0.07900 Investor's Thrift 6 Loan 04-24-86 04-24-87 100,000 0.08100 Capitol Bank of Calif. 04-28 -86 04-28 -87 100,000 0.07250 Golden Coin Swings 6 Loan 04 -29-86 04-29 -81 100,000 0.07500 Wilshire Swings 6 Loan 05 -09-86 05 -11 -87 100,000 0.07750 Manila Bank of Calif. 05 -12 -86 05 -12 -97 100,000 0.07500 Western Federal 9 6 L 05 -14-86 05 -14-97 100,000 0.07875 Sank of San Francisco 05 -19-96 05 -14-87 100,000 0.07350 Bank of America I1 -19-86 05 -18-87 1,000,000 0.05750 La Cumbre Swings Bank 10 -20 -66 05 -18-87 100,000 0.06000 Paramount Swings 6 Loan 05 -16 -86 05 -18.87 95,000 0.08000 Antelope Valley 9 6 L 05 -16 -86 05 -18.97 100,000 0.07750 Stockton Swings 6 1.020 05 -16 -96 0S -18-87 100,000 0.07500 Encino Swings 6 Loan 04-20 -86 05 -20-e7 100,000 0.07750 FAIR MAIEZT :x VALUE t• , Cy •p. Mass , f Y i s I Investment Status Report Ut Pate 5 ei rURCRASE HATURITT IRTERIST PAIR H6RRET'. 'mS' IPUITHflT UTS_ -j7' MOUNT A_ V6t.0E Southwest Savings 6 Loan 05 -20 -66 05 -20-97 100,000 0.07800 Tracy Savings 4 Loan 05 -21 -86 05 -21 -97 100,000 0.07500 Columbia Savings 6 Loan 05 -22 -96 05 -22 -97 100,000 0.07450 Republic Federal Savings 05 -22 -86 05 -22 -87 100,000 0.07500 Coadnity 'Thrift 6 Loan 05 -23 -86 05 -23 -87 100,000 0.07600 Tahoe Swings i Loan 05-23 -86 05-23-3I 98,000 0.07800 Highland Savings 6 Loan 05 -23 -86 05 -26 -87 100,000 0.07750 � i Brookside Savings 4 Loan 05 -28-86 05 -28-87 100,000 0.07900 Vest Coast Swings 6 Loan 05 -25-86 05 -28-87 100,000 0.07500 Equitable Swinge 6 Loan 06 -02 -86 06 -02 -67 100,000 0.08000 Sierra Thrift 6 Loan 06 -02 -86 06 -02 -87 100,000 0.08050 Southwest Sw:,to 4 Loan 06 -20-86 06 -02 -87 100,000 0.07750 City Swings 6 Loan 06 -03 -86 06 -03 -87 100,000 0.07500 Life Swings 6 Loan 06-04 -86 06 -04-87 100,000 0.07750 Sterling Bank 06 -04-86 06 -04-97 100,000 0.07500 Imperial Thrift 4 Loan 06 -05-96 05 -03 -87 100,000 0.07600 Ventura City Nat'l Bank 06 -06 -86 06 -08.07 100,000 O.C7750 Sterling Sw ings 4 Loan 06-06 -86 06 -05-87 100,000 0.07500 Rome Thrift 4 Loan 06 -09-86 06 -09-87 100,000 0.07750 Gulden Security G6 -16 -86 06 -16 -87 100,000 0.07500 Santa Barbara S 4 L 06 -17 -66 06 -17 -97 100,000 0.08050 ` .F Fidelity Swings 06 -17 -96 06 -15-87 100,000 0.07850 n= Foothill Independent Bank 12 -18-86 06 -15-97 772,894 Treasury _ -, L, Till •1 A `:•��,� '• =; .,4� lank of San Rnon 06 -19-86 06 -19-97 109,000 0.07500 :�' '+. ° 4.. °:�.}'�fT•k,�: li'i��y,9y1•.:r��ii�:+. rid •'fN LOSS c I� Investment Statue Report Page 6 PURCIASP MATURITY JlIIf� _DATI— AMOUNT 5 Y.• tiff INTEREST FAIR KARAT RATS_ VALUS National Dank of Calif 06 -20-86 06 -22 -87 100,000 0.07700 Charter Savings 6 Loan 06 -20 -86 06 -22 -87 100,000 0.07850 American Commerce Nat'l 06 -23 -86 06 -23 -87 100,000 0.07625 Executive Savings 6 Loan 06 -23 -96 06 -23 -87 100,000 0.07875 Imperiat Savings 06 -30-86 06 -30-87 100,000 0.07500 American Interstate Saviogs 07 -02 -96 07 -02 -37 100,000 0 08000 First Deposit Savings Dank 07 -03 -96 07 -03 -87 100,000 0.07800 Havthorne Savings 6 Loan 07 -07 -96 07 -07 -67 100,000 0.08000 Investment Savings 6 Loan 07 -07 -86 07 -07 -87 100,000 0.07375 U.S. Community Sao Logs Bank 07 -07 -86 07 -07 -97 100,000 0.07500 Westlake Thrift 6 Loan 07 -07 -96 07-07 -87 100,000 0.08500 Wasaiugton Savings 6 Loan 06 -16 -86 07 -16 -87 100,000 0.08250 Statewide Thrift g Loan 06 -16 -86 07 -16 -97 100,000 0.07750 Commercial Center Dank 07 -18-86 01 -20-87 100,000 0.06400 Amador Valley Sav, logs 6 Loan 07 -18-86 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.072500 First Commercial Dank 07 -21 -66 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07250 First Sierra Bank 07 -21 -86 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07600 Perpetual Savings 6 Loan 07 -21 -96 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07500 Sierra Federal Soviets 07 -1686 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07500 Pioneer Savings 6 Loan 07 -18-36 07 -21 -97 99,000 0.07500 Viking Saw Lugs 6 Loan 07 -21 -86 07 -21 -87 100,000 0.07625 Rome Savings of America 07 -21 -86 07 -21 -97 100,000 0.07300 Bay View Federal S i L 07 -22 -96 07 -22 -87 10,000 0.07500 Great Western 9 i L 07 -19-86 07 -21-97 400,000 0.65000 . t a „Yak.- .*s «•M. _ .tt;r � ". ":r... t� Investment Status Report - -'. . >f Pap 7 , rlhW' _ FORCKASE MATURITY INTEREST FAIR MARKET, Inumax VALUE V Cabrillo Savings Rank 07 -24-86 07 -28-97 100,000 0.07250 a • Lab Savings 6 Loam 07 -29-96 07 -29-97 100,000 0.07550 r, � Caysaau Bant 07 -30-86 07 -70-51 100,000 0.07250 i Empire -California S 6 L 07-30 -66 07 -30-57 100,000 0.09000 `t Pacific Regency Rank 07 -31 -86 07 -31 -97 100,000 0.07250 ti >' Global Swings Dank 09-06 -86 09 -04-97 100,000 0.07600 Inland Savings 6 Loan 08-04 -86 09 -06-97 100,000 0.07625 a Plaza Savings 6 Loan 08 -11 -86 09 -11 -87 100,000 0.07600 Glendale Federal 06 -25-86 08-25 -87 100,000 0.06450 Convey Savings 6 Loan 08-26 -66 08-26 -87 100,000 0.06625 s First Security On legs Rank 04-05 -86 09-08-a7 48,000 0.07375 Liberty Savings 6 Loan 02 -13 -96 09 -14-87 100,000 0.09250 4� Peninsula Sr fogs 03 -20-96 09 -16 -87 100,000 0.09000 100,000 Torrance Savings v.3 -20-96 09 -16 -97 100,000 0.08500 100,000 ;*- Iioulebold look 0 }19-85 09-21 -87 100,000 0.07000 Osui Bank 09 -19-86 09 -21 -87 109,000 0.06100 lank of America 09 -22 -86 09 -22 -87 100,000 0.05975 • lank of America 09 -23 -96 09-23 -87 100,000 0.05925 r~ �i Valley Federal S 6 L 09 -23 -86 09.23 -87 500,000 0.06700 E. Western Financial Sav into 1C -06 -96 10 -06 -87 100,000 0.06750 4 j. Bank of Beverly Hill. 10-14-86 10 -14-87 100,000 0.06400 v?- lank of Whittier 10 -21 -96 10 -16 -87 100,000 0.06500 - 'rR y, Vista Savings Raak 10-17-96 10-19-97 100.000 0.06750 Western Empire S 6 L 10-20 -86 10 -20-87 99,000 0.07000 lel R: N� t'AFT�: i� T' -'i �.A s S J •d.Y.'Y � .:i: t.1 _`?rtwJe[ r r s L Investment Status Report Page 6 Q"Y� rit�i PURCRASE KATURIT! _an_ _PATE _ ANOUN k' INTUIST FAIR KARAT 'K9 10 -20 -87 100,000 0.06750 *, Long Beacb Savings 6 Loan 10 -20 -86 11 -09-87 Capital lederal S 6 L 11 -07 -86 11 -13 -87 San Clemente Swings 6 Loan 11 -0' -86 11 -17 -67 500,000 0.05150 ' Bank of Nevport 11 -14-86 11 -21 -87 Bank of America 11 -17 -96 12 -29-87 Pomona First red 8 6 L 11 -19-96 12 -29-87 Commerce Swings 11 -26 -86 01 -28-88 First red. Swings Bank 0.09750 02 -01 -88 of California 11 -26 -96 02 -04-88 riwucial $wiogo 6 Loan 12 -04.86 03 -05-89 Bank of America 12-1086 03 -07 -88 Eacoodido Swings i Loan 06 -16 -86 03 -07 -88 California federal S 6 L 12 -15-96 03 -07 -88 Bassoon Swings 6 Loan 12 -15-86 United Bank 12 -22 -86 Community Dank 12 -29-86 Vineyard National Bank 12 -29-96 Eastern Swings 6 Loan 01 -29-96 q; Cal America Swings 01 -31 -86 Camino Real swings 08-09 -36 American West Bank 03 -03-86 International Sw lags Bank 03 -05-86 J 4 Bidden Valley National Bank 03 -05-66 Pan American Owings Bask 03 -05-86 k' INTUIST FAIR KARAT 'K9 10 -20 -87 100,000 0.06750 11 -09-87 100,000 0.06750 ' 11 -09-87 100,000 0.06875 11 -13 -87 100,000 0.06350 11 -17 -67 500,000 0.05150 11 -19-87 100,000 6.0 -12.0 Variable Rate 11 -21 -87 99,000 0.06500 ' 11 -17 -87 100,000 0.06500 12 -04-87 100,000 0.06800 12 -10-97 500,000 0.05650 12 -14-87 100,000 0.08000 12 -15-f7 400,000 0.06050 12 -15 -87 100,000 0.06200 12 -22 -87 100,000 0.0573 12 -29-87 500,000 0.06150 12 -29-87 100,000 0.06250 01 -28-88 100,000 0.09750 02 -01 -88 100,000 0.09600 02 -04-88 100,000 0.09000 03 -05-89 100,000 0.08750 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.09750 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.08750 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.087X` 300,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 .00.000~ 100.000 > Q.�YUn.�. . �i➢,`. • .4 v. J•� ._Y4�a'Y�HS..- +'�y'f 9 �`] Investment Status [ sport X44 lags 9 fc. �., !0lGlAl[ MA19[I1T S1281[9i FAIR NADTII' IDF[SIMENT am A[ ._IM VALUI '�'• t. Lincoln Savings 6 Loan 03 -06 -86 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.08800 100,000 Los Angeles Federal Sayings 03 -11 -86 G3-10-88 100,000 0.09000 100,000 _ Hamilton Savings tank 03 -26 -86 03 -2848 100,000 0.08500 100,000 Universal Savings lank 03 -27 -86 03 -28-88 100,000 0.08500 100,000 �`. Dean Witter Reynolds 04-18 -85 05 -15-88 97,181 Treasury 120.586 a loads2 _ Commerce Dank of San Luis Obispo 06 -19-86 06 -20-88 100,000 0.08000 100,000 ,V San .lose National Dank 07 -06-86 07 -07 -88 100,000 0.08000 100,000 I `•- Valle to Ora lank 07 -16 -86 07 -15-88 300,000 0.07600 100,000 g Sri - Valley National Dank 07 -18-86 07 -38-88 100.000 0.07500 100.000 Delta Savings 6 Loaa 08 -08-86 08 -08-88 100,000 0.07500 100,000 Y Sunrise Dank 03 -14-86 09 -14-86 100.000 0.08750 100.000 Gatevay Savings 6 Loan 03 -2546 09 -25-88 100,000 0.08375 100,000 First Global Savings Dank 11 -14-86 11 -14-88 100.000 0.06500 100,000 Dank of Westminster 12 -05-86 12 -O"S 100.000 0.07125 100.000 i i� Pacific Onion task 6 crust 12 -04-86 12 -03-88 100.000 0.07125 100.000 S Great Pacific Savings 02 -03 -86 02 -03 -89 100,000 0.09750 100.000 's Desert Community lank 02 -13 -86 02 -13 -89 100,000 0.09875 100,000 National Dank of Catalina 02 -27 -86 02 -27 -89 100,000 O.C9500 100,000 North Coast Savings 03 -03 -66 03 -03 -89 100,000 0.09250 100,000 Continental Sav logs 03 -055-86 03 -07 -89 100,000 0.09250 100.000 Independence Savings 03 -05 -86 03 -07 -89 100,000 0.09150 100,000 • Heritage Oaks lank 03 -11 -86 033-10 -89 100,000 0.09000 - '100;000 .., it tic Weataide See ings 6 Loan 03 -11 -86 03 -10-89 100,000 0.09000 100,000 `:rrC ,. NZ 5-W Mr ,i •.r A• :�•- � ��Y�'%�.EY� Investment Status Report A Page 10 d' PURCHASE MATURITr ._ UL- . DATS_ AMOUNT IIITECBST PAIR, MAJ=T RAT[ VALOR Rmer.ate Savings 4 Loan 03 -11 -86 03 -10-89 100,000 0.09000 Buis" Valley Bank 03 -12 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09000 Coast Bank 03 -13 -86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09059 Regency Bank 03 -14-86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.05750 Pacific Business Bank 03 -14-86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.08750 Sacramento First National 03 -14-86 03 -13 -89 100,000 0.09250 !r Novato National Bank 03 -19-86 03 -15-89 100,000 0.09500 Bank of Del Mar 03 -17 -86 03 -16 -99 100,000 0.08750 Bay Area Bonk 03 -17 -86 03 -16 -89 100,000 0.09000 First American Bank 03 -18-86 03 -17 -89 100,000 0.0975L City Commerce Bank 03 -21 -96 03 -20-89 100,000 0.08750 bank of Commerce 03 -25-86 03 -25-89 100,000 0.09000 Constitution on Inge 03 -25-86 03 -2849 99,000 0.09250 Pacific Coast Sae Inge 08 -08-86 03 -30-89 100,000 0.07000 ` Valley Commercial Bank 03 -12 -86 09-0849 100,000 0.09250 Stockdale Savings 6 Loan 03 -19-89 09 -15-89 100,000 0.09250 - Mission Valley Bank 03 -26 -86 09 -22 -89 100,000 0.09000 Homestead Savings 6 Loan 10 -09-96 :0 -09-89 100,000 0.07100 Malibu Savings 6 Loan 12 -05-86 12 -04-89 100,000 0.07500 Goverment Nat'l Mortgage 05 -22 -86 3 -15 -2001 99,903 0.08500 Goverment Nat'l Mortgage 07 -22 -86 5-15 -2001 737,241 0.'x8500 SBA CID Loan Pool CTFS 07 -25-86 7 -25 -2011 997,268 0.00750 r Local Agency Invest Fund 10 -19-86 As Needed 2,256,000 0.07430 *F. Local Agency Invest Fund 10 -19-86 As Needed 2,750,000 0.07430 Baak of America 07 -11 -86 'Passbook Mj•UL 0.05000 k Lr 't oo r`' Sub Totalt 9,165,463 5. Yr; j7 ..t ?tln � +,V; ?;,?'uJ�.ti :'v . i .�'.l _ ., t�i4�: %•. , 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,073 738,494 1,096,995 ;w iiE;q 4+� rye` � ..... .'.•_ , .. �� : YL.� � s ^ v c�.,..; y6 "aijU Investment Status Report' +• ?ate 11 , .•' •,y pDRCWASd MATUNITT MERESI TAIRMARRDT 5 r IR98STNOIT DATA DAn AMOUNT VALUE _ E 1 ro-6s j Great Vestern Savings 12 -04-96 01 -05-87 3,438,067 0.06100 Sub Totals 3,439,067 Great western $swings 11 -02 -86 01 -05-87 4,100,000 0.06150 Western financial 30 -06 -86 10-06 -87 100,000 0.06750 $ ✓ Western Empire 10 -20-86 10 -20-87 99,000 0.07000 .� Century Saints A Loan 02 -26 -86 02 -26 -87 100.000 0.09730 � Y }, An of 12 -31 -86 Grand 'total: 47,528,762 k t ^ +, *1 Treasury Dille are purchased at a price belor their maturity value. they `'. are quotrd and traded on the basis of yield to maturit7. s2 The approximate interest earned on this Investment will be $34,000.00. ". *3 Securities which are backed by pools of twern•!nC insured or tuaranteed "0 mortgages. Rote 4: All investments are Certificates of Deposit unless otherwise noted above. rm r 1� t i-t ti ^ �� �p,k� '..�P +s..)+ 'ice• ' ��.�_� �� • ,�,. -�.^ +���j %JA( .ir iy y¢�'l `hwv'*`irR'�� yl'..R�a' S ."`` iR;t�i�. . _ - 1'A� rv2 • R ^k�1 a� 1 rx;'�V.. w .s.' :rp "��•7a^"Y �•'i ; r., Ri: e"k$� CITY OF ILANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 Uj $$ I_ TO: City Council and City Manager 1�.— FRCM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Release of Agraements for Postpormsent of CCLR's for Tract 13022 It is recoaaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Revocation, Release, Satisfaction and Cancelation of Agreement for Tract 13022 Lots 1 thru 181 and Tract 13022 Lot 182 thru 275 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreerents and to cause same to record Background /Analysis On June 18, 1986, the City Council entered into an agreement for the postponement of MR's for Tract 13022, said agreement was recorded on July 1, 1986, document No. 86- 173122, Official Records of San Bern&. -lino County California. CCLR's hove been approved by the City Attorney for Harmington Mmes and Pulte Have Corporation the buyers of Tract 13022, consisting of 275 lots. The CCLR's were recorded as follows: 1. Lots 1 through 181 owned by Marmington Hares recordel In San Bernardino County, California, on November 7, 1986, Document No. 86- 332043. 2. Lots 182 through 275 owned by Pulte Home Corporation recorded in San Bernardino County, California, on October 16, 1986, rocucent No. 86- 303609. The recording of the CCLR's meets all conditions of sha Agreement recorded on July 1, 1986. N B: 1 1 submitted, /9 i i n RECORDED REQUESTED By MO WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: a City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga REVOCATION, RELEASE, SATISFACTION AND CANCELLATION OF AGREEINENT THIS REVOCATION, REI7ASE, SATISFACTION AVID CANCELLATION Of AGREENONT Is entered into this day of 19 p and is to be effective that date, regardless of tXi ,qta of axec—Moo hereof, and is by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as •City) and Pulte Now Corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as •Developer•). WHEREAS, City and Developer entered into an agreement dated June 13, 1966, recorded as document No. 66- 173422 on July 1, 1966, Official Records of San Bernardino County, California (*Agreement'), which was to provide assurance to the City that no building permit for a work of improvement would be issued and no permanent utility hookups could be made therefor on the Project constructed on Tract 13022 until the set of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (•CCLR's•) acceptable to the City had been reviewed and recorded; and WHEREAS, Developer is the owner and developer of the Project described in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, a set of CC&R's for the work of improvement on Tract 13022 has been reviewed and approved by the City and by the California Department of Real Estate and was recorded on October 16, 1966, as Document No. 86- 303609, Official Records of San Bernardino County, California; and WHEREAS, the Agreement provides in paragraph 3 thereof that once CCIA's are approved by the Department of Real Estate and are satisfactory to and approved by City and have been recorded, City and Developer or its successor in interest shall execute and record a document declaring that the conditions have been satisfied and that the Agreement is null, void, cancelled, satisfied and of no further force and effect; and WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to the Agreement or its cancellation have been met; Pulte Now Corporation Attn: Robert Smith 1301 Dove Street Suite 810 Newport Beach, Cat 9:627 �t NW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. That certain Agreement dated Jane 13, 1916, recorded 'as document No. C6- 173422 on July 1, 1966. Official Records of San /ernardlgo County, California, is hereby ra shall be henceforth null, void, cancelled, released and of no further force and effect and City hereby declares that all of the conditions hereof have been satisfied by Developer. 2. he CFM's for the Project constructed on Tract 13022 will and have replaced the Ayr"wt in Its entirety. era WHEREFORE, this AS ooamnt 1s executed the day and year first above '•. written. " DEVELOPER CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONOA ri �? PULTE HOME CORPO ION IY: BY: Or Of the City o Rancho Cucamonga, IY ATTEST: �+ V of construciton city Flom of or Rancho Cucamonga t STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. CO(MTY of SAN IERIIAADINO On 1O, before me, the undersigned, a Notar,/ Public In ard% said oun and State, personally appeared and proved to me on the basis of satlsfac R i viCWWe�'o be persons who executed this instrument as NWr and City Mork, respectively, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed it. 2, WITNESS q hand and official seal. Y Notary c 3 j•Y " try.? ��{,?dT &AA �ti.�'. ._ � •� A lw X M95 RECORDED REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETUNM TO: City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga REVOCATION, RELEASE, SATISFACTION AND CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT THIS REVOCATION, RELEASE, SATISFACTION AND CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 19, and is to be effective that date, regardless of triato of exec —u—MA hereof, and is by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as •City") and Warmington Pacific I, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Developer "). WHEREAS, City and Developer entered into an agreement dated June 13, 1936, recorded as document No. 86- 173422 on July 1, 1986, Official Records of San, Bernardino County, California ( "Agreement "). which was to provide assurance to the City that no building permit for a work of improvement would be issued and no permanent utility hookups could be made therefor on the Project constructed on Tract No. 13022 until the set of Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions ("CCU's") acceptable to the City had been reviewed and recorded; and WHEREAS. Developer is the owner and developer of the Project Lascribed in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, a set of CUR's for the work of Improvement on Tract 13022 has been reviewed and approved by the City and by the California Department of Real Estate, end was recorded on November 7, 1986, as Document No. 86- 332013, Official Records of San Bernardino County, California; and WHEREAS, the Agreement provi0as in paragraph 3 thereof that once MR 's are approved by the Department of Real Estate and are satisfacto;,y to and approved by City and have been recorded, City and Developer or its successor in tntermst shall execute airJ record a document declaring that the conditions have been satisfied and that the Agreewnt is null, void, cancelled, satisfied and of no further force and effect; and WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to the Agreement or its cancellation have bean met; Warmingtcn Homes Attn: Scott Harris 3090 Pullman Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 1 23 V. d Z NON, THERLFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. That certain Agreewt dated June 13, 1986, rvorded as document No. 86- 173122 on July 1, 1986, Official Records-of San Bernardino, County, California, is hereby and shall be henceforth null, void, cancelled, released and of no further force and effect and City hereby declares that all'of the conditions hereof have been satisfied by Developer. 2. The CUR's for the Project nd , constructed on Tract 13022 will a have replrced the Agreement in its entirety. written. whtAEFDRE, this Agreeeent is executed the day and year first above DEVELOPER CITY OF RANCHO COCAMBNBA BY�V BY: w1131aai Sion ice Presi ant or o e y o Rancho Cucamonga BY: 41 rA ATTEST: Tillo,xny F. pogan; 3 r ice PResident Glty Clark of 0 Rancho Cucamonga STATE OF CALIFORNIA + as. C011MTY OF SAN Bf1MARDIN0 1 On 1986, before me. the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for Said County and State, personally appeared and proied to = on the basis of satisfactory ev ce o be a persons executed this instrument as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public �2 ra i IN f trjt�' Y RESOLUTION NO. 87 -0va. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEWAT FOR POSTPONEMENT .a OF APPROVAL OF CCIR'S FOR TRACT 13022 MEREAS, to meet the requirwnts, as a prerequisite to approval of building permits for Tract 13022, the subdivider of said tract, The William Lyon Company, entered into an Agreement for Postponement of CC&R's, WHEREAS, said requirements have been met: by the,, recordation of CCIR's, documents No.'s 66- 332013 and 86- 303609 recorded in San Bernardino County, California and the current developers, Warrington Homes and Pulte Home Corporation, have each submitted a Revocation, Release, Satisfaction and Cancelation of Agreement for approval and execution by said City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California as follows: 1. That said agreements be and the same are approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf.of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. a•9•lT"i to � ` >,..1Y�iLL' 1J`giat. �' sia t A w. filkill -4 I.; An Improvement Agreement and letters of credit were approved by CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Council on October 16, 1985, for Tract 11853. STAFF REPORT # The letters of credit have expired and the Developer, Roy f Construction Corporation, is submitting a new agreement and security to K guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following GGt x - DATE: January 21, 1987 Z_ Faithful Performance Bond: $42,500 TO: City Council and City Manager ism Labor and Material Bond: $21,300 FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer C BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician a: SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Office. Tract 11853 located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and ' Ramona Avenue, and release of Improvement Agreement and Security approved by Council on October 16, 1905, submitted by Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation RECO MOATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security, releasing the agreement and security approved on October 16, 1985, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement . ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND E An Improvement Agreement and letters of credit were approved by the City ;1 Council on October 16, 1985, for Tract 11853. The letters of credit have expired and the Developer, Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation, is submitting a new agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $42,500 Labor and Material Bond: $21,300 ' Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerks's Office. +! Respectf submitted, ! }, Attachments " JY� L E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDFEE MG DIVL910N 1 �` N:. - I :r.'LU' TRACT NAP 11857 �a FJMB . �. a TES �•L Yw �5 f �• clTr OF RA11cNO alfaliorcA IMPRO H1El1T ATREBOT FOR TRACT 11!53 KNOW ALL MIX BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Roy E. Daly, Construction Corporation hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract 11853; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Ramona Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 6 hereof within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. ♦. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions surety by tthelf�llcostMand expense thereupon incurred. cover from the S. The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said "_.. development in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Z; Cucamonga County Water District. 9330 Use Line Road Ste 206 1 Rancho Cuca"a CA 91730 �9 9y. ' 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer c and the owner of such water systea. 7. Improvements required to be constructed shall cocforru to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, M to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements are tabulated on the Construction and lend Estimate, hercby incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the Improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construction of sny transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and ? prcoer surface drainage. Errors or omissions discovered during constructin shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover tll cost and expense s incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lemful means. 11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedication of the streets and easements in said subidivlsion, up to the 0opletion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said City Counci , give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said street or easement and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the completion of all improvements, herein incorporated on Page 7 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to prottrt the public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be mods. 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading and etearup has -teen .A completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordarte with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. 1t r0r 2 ; The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees pl-nted iu good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for, one year after planting, whichrier is-later. 13. The Developer is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City ordiances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed thereunder until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no Improvtotnt security provided hereinwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall -not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with U°e required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor. to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been aceepted, and this agreement and the improvement ° securit therefor has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be to a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A 5 id or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. B. To secure laborers and mutsrialmen: Y, 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.2. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit_ with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor wf+ose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, it no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and bend Estimate - contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as procedure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. 3 30 •r. i jY D. The required bonds and the principal emiounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreemant. 16. The Developer warraits that the improvements described in this agreement shall be from' from defects in materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the improvements found to be defective within; one (1) year following the data on which the i provemants are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the, City. The. Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or 3290.00, whlchaver 1s greater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obligations as described in this paragraph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the DmvelepaF to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have bun accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvemeit security, described .n this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Mae Act and any applicable City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the -work or from operations under this agreemer', whether such operations be by himself ez by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability and roperty damage insurance shall list the City as additonal insured cnd directly protect the City, its officers, agents and eeplVeas, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all incur ice policies issued hereunder shall so state. The minimum emounts of such it irance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less than 3500,000 for each person aid $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, aid property damest liability limits of not less than 3250.000 for each accident or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $500,000 for claims which MAY arise from the operations of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided. O. Automobile liability insurance performance of this a7rec.ent limits of not less than $500,000 ' each accidatt or occurrence, and not less than 3250.00D for aW aggregate of not less than 3500, tions of the Developer or his provided for herein. 4 31 ill vehicles used in the bodily iniury liability. person and $1,000,000 for 1~ liability limits of : or occurrence, with an may arise from the-opera- in performing tte,Frork 4 . 7rN • +�)t}`Eh7yi? - Y` � - - t � r•9 �i �i:: •�,,Vej 16. That before, the execution of this agrement, the Developer shall_ file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering-the , specified Insurance. Each such ;rwrtificate shall o «r an orders et- t bsiif tteaioeeCy uchcerticate �befon the expiration of hiry(30)�aftr the City shall have received notification by registered nail from the insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, Lad of intent tc corply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the •following described am iaprovent security, and has a.fixed his signature hereto: 5 z. ,i icy •' Yy r r)iti . 1. a 4t z Type: Principal Mount: 542,500. .- Name and address of surety: BAIMA INSURANCE COMPANY, 3349 Michelson Dr,, Irvine, CA 92715 ' WTERIAL Ai1D LAIM PAYNUIT Type: Principal Mount: $21,300 Now and address of surety: BAWA-INSURANCE COMPANY. 3349 Michelson Drive, Irvine. CA 92715 CASH DEPOSIT NONileiTATION i Type: Cash (Rec. 31301, 10 -4-85 Principal Amount: S 1,450 Name and address oP surety: TO BE POSTED M149 TD ACCEFIWE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties harato have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their morW Date r +- jtt/AFL_ by —.Developer bignature Leo Oats by Developer Signature Printed Accepted: City of darcho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Approved: City Attorney DEYEIDMIS SINAWIE NUST BE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE 1-r , 33 £� # ski:;: •r_';n: BOND NO. NAA 029373 . " PREMIUM: $918.00 G• CITY OF PAKHO =%VAWA FA17WUL PE "WACE MO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of i California, and Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation (hereinafter designated as "principal•) have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install end complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 198 and identified as project Tract 11853 is hereby referred o and ma a P&A— ereof; and. WHEREAS, said principal is required under the tens of said agreement to , furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of anc o camonga (hereinafter called •City "). in the penal sum of forty -two thousand flue hundred Dollars (542,500) lawful money of the United States for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourse3ves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, ,jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. r The condition of this obligation is such that if the above banded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide F„ and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof mode as therein provided, on his ^.r their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner .herein specified and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall Indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby arA i•r addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be Irtluded costs and reasonable expenses and fees, includiny reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any ,ludpent rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the wo&. to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the saw! shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and It does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this instrement has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on DECEMBER 12 . 1986 ROY E. DALY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION BALBOA LNSURANCE C0MPANY v oiler rim— y y. J ghee nay re °BARBARA TNIII PLEASE ATTACH PWR OF AT IMEY TO ALL NONDS SIGNATURES MKT BE NOTARIZED 7 MIST 8E C0MPLEM III TRIPLICATE in FSECUIED 14 TRIPLICATE '1 BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY JN9 WCHELM OWL MVML CAUFORK"V]71 }1101 GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY Ka0wA11AleahyY1tuPmcet; Thr9ALSOA INSURANCECOMPANY. AcaporWmdwlywsa ditdanaeelewpundaw urtaw Stew a Cahfemia, Cod hn(e3 ao IxWW otna, k twine. Grasp Counry, Cahforela, don by cow p"ernu make. cauumw and appain: R L THIEL and BARBARA THIEL a Santa Ana ad Suuo( Q11fornla W use and larfW Altmcy(sN6FacL weh full porn ad avbnity hereby c dvrvdk W ewer. plea, and sued, w eartmtr, achnwWp and de0rer 22 000 000 -ANY AND ALL BONDS Compwy Caduhdrldw CemgnytMCeHuhsyandawCameaing u couchbmd1wmttfmdid WeP )% weedrhbwn tW prww>f Said ----I — and dWy awstedb.. Secntaly,.. . ratifJiadada.fuminS all thew said Attaoey(s}— - aaaydokwprtmltti Said 'le fr Ranlre< thu w P"eldtet. uy via-Pteldest. my Sem Lary r any A uuteos Scernary shl) be and It hc"b rested with fWl powr 1Wfaw-hWilr s omrlaon altabuprnpuuAttam,( o} Io-Faquleprcuaadanfradmwhal fathcCampaey wbJCna 'Is Warm 92M asd be capma sal i Staw of Cakwda Coumy aonsye Waling rurmleatutwCaepurysWW+ty UP." w Compasy as If slpd by the Per Oa" 9111 darof "umed the wkhfn iawmmu u acknowledged to Im thas the owpmuloa cuamed a. v Loa= sYl�gm.Am a. tam wcNlhntpretMawWsiptdbyhs VIrw PPPatA.nt days nrrainher A.D.192B_ BALSOA INSURANCE COMPANY H. R. Huckaay _, a Retry pu" pereoaaty appeared Petaawp wowa M ma to be w Psuoa who ca Whettedw arpormi m 01MIA awe" W F, �� Y. . Robbins Naary Pobac Lwanderlwad Secretary or BatboaImurm eccmF+ y. wrCbyaNy thewabreW ImIsciyba114trwedopencopyatke Oripal Power ofAummy loved by uld Caapury, and do boob Mohr ar* t►u W said Power of AuwW Y mill is bee, ad CBect. Aid Idow "b0awra,rtlhy that the CeltdScWoaa07a M.m o(Allormy6alpW and u&WbyfanieiMrMr W bwrabrlyaw fdksiegroolrka bkWAd by der bordaDiacmn aw BaRoatewnacs C= yat a modeddfy cWodad hold as W41h aMoro 197:, W twJ saw "tunics W as wee Nuadaa or tepnW: .s "RESOLVED.t►mw stprmaaw Secretary rpyAwWr Secretary ad a Cwpwmim rdw ralaCapws"mayw W" 01001441yfaa,im(Iatoayanifamto aPo►raMmneyatW Corpurseim ud lW sub primed faaWMsfpatrs sad oil &W W,B!w MA Sld'ay wpm O(s Cappdos" cr' Nado mywd adwualaWd Comalay.rtcrw. califlvYa, 16(s 12Eb day of mWf .19 8tl Westw Mary h-_.. 3S' alk BOND NO. NAA 029373 _41` PREMIM INCLUDED IN PERFORMANCE BM CITY OF PJMM CUCALDAGA LAIM AID MTERIALM IOND WHEREAS, the City Council 'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation (hereinafter designated as 'principal•) have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to, Install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated A 198_ and Identified as protect Tract 11853 Is hereby referred o en made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, under the tarts of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient Igyment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is msde in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Pan. 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NON, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, ara held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material an and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to to the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure In the sum of twenty -om thousand three hundred Dollars ($21,300), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amcunts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said suety will pay the saw in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expanses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims andar Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082 of Part t of Divison 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of `.imm, alteration or addition to the tares of said agreement or the specifica0ms accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on nrrrwary 17 " 198_ ROY E. DALY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION BALBOA INSURA MOCAlPANT (Developer) h�IA,R �ILI (Surety) (Signature) 1A many -,n- act BARBARA THM PLEASE ATTACH MM OF ATTMEY TO ALL D6ID5 SIOUTIMES MUST E W MIZED MIST E CNIPLETED 131 TRIPLICATE EXECUTED IN TRIPLICATE BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY no MK LNN amm aVWL cALlmm"011111eoa GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KaowAllbfm by TMsefiytaslt TharBALSOA INSUItANCECOMPANY. scorpmtiondulyatanisd endsJstintudatheAwscfthe Slate of CaOfmia, and luring Its principal office Y term, Orarya Canary. CYforak don by theta prc a to ode, oonsiurte sad aypnnt R. L. THIEL and BARBARA THIEL of Santa Ana wA State o(_ Califorrl!e lu we and lawful Attolsey(shWFact waft full power and authority heat' wdcffed in Its sae. plea, nd se4 to easaru, aclmrledte and debar $2.000.000 - ANY AND ALL BONDS lefeAaol" thatthe President nay Vita- PreJdcat."y SteretaryasoyAtJttant %canaryshall bi and Is hembyresedwbhfuil power ad aothariry w aypo(at soy inns a man suitable persms u A ucnwy(s)- W Fa a w rspeseat ad as far and en be half of the Cmpmy wb1 w w the following P -iskec "fn Wbam IPhow Ban" Ins Ipt aepaayl has caused these prams w be shoed by W _Ylrw FReJA.ne ad hs eotpanta wJ w be b 1 `" day d n...meue A.D. 19.1 _ State ofcaWarda Caumy 0(Oratlte Oathb Sth day.( BALBOA INSUPANCE COMPANY sy � a�� K. R. Huckahay necuud the within iutas ¢ as ackewledMd to m that W m7mt as eum"d it is R l ROMBIB tRe Ai arye.a nP.a�at tar .intbyeu acae befmme —. a notary public, penose0y aPpcard . penally kltowa w ale w be 1N pen who a behalf of the ewpwulm thmis sand tad P. O. Robbins Notary PuWie Ltkausdrsw- Sevauryof Babes iseureaa catepssy, bmb7cutifythatbe Yore and hapiyO lfJL trite aw correct gory arthe Oti jssl Paver of Attotsey iuud by sW Compsay, aed do hereby huther mtW that Lbe Bald Power ofAs,asey Y sill la bares ssd effect. And Ida MmbyA Wres*" theCsWicadwor "I~c(AtawnlaSIPWmadwJMyfaainile mega seal by the wtba4yoOM awingruc Alm sdepud by us Boardo(DY.een of be Swas I.sue..ncoxgwyuamwdntadyeaWd mWheata Rr 24,hetMartin 1972, ad Am uW nsobrdns has sin bees, amm4ad a mpeand: "RF30LVED.thattMsiBSew ofWSwretaryaseyAssfataarSserstarya (tW Capaodae.adlMlsal o(Cw►orNks.raayMafud aPArNyf aMf4wssyanl6creb ■Pwera(Attorrya(thbCapamtbit W WttacbPrsnedfaalartMsigsalarr/MeW WBLa•aW .. W Wsdisg Was, 16h Cor}w•aLLas," 61 .Nem rysly bad W 1M seal of seW CmW. N Irvin, CalVad%Ws t« w 3 � sarw.ry A i E A d a 6r RESOLUTIM NO. 87 -613 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMCII OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREE1OT AND IMPCOVENDIT SECURITY FOR TRI" 11853 Mn RELEASING THE INPMEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY APPROVED OCTOBER 16,4985 44FREAS, the City Cdu -cil of the City of Rancho Cucawton, Califon, a. has f ,)r its consideration on Improvement Agreement executed t',n December 19, 1986, by Roy E. Daly Constrection Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right- of-way adjacent, to the real property specifically described'therein, and ganorally located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and Ramona Avenue; and L'HEREAS this agreement and 3tcurity replaces the Impruvement Agreement and Improvement Security approved by City Council on October 16, 1985, and WHEREAS, the installation of Bach I provement3, described in sold taprovement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjenction witn the development of said real property Es referred to Punning Commission. Tract 11053; and WHEREAS, said improvement Agreement 13 secured and accomjQiled by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said idpry:ement Agreement. :IOW, THEREFORE. 6E IT RESOLVLO by the City Council di the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calitiornia, that said Iaproiement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and ttie -same are Luray approved and the kiyor Is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agrr. nt on behalf t.f the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attatt thereto, end the City Cler; is hereby authorized to reioase the Improve3"t Agreement and Improvement Security approved on October 16, 1985. t, �t r N O T~ 'i RECOMMI110RTIM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting said agreements and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements. AMALYSIS /BACKf.ROUND DR 86-08 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 28, 1986, in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District located on the northwest corner of Cottage and Acacia Street. The Developer, Mahlon Sampson, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performanco Bond: $22,000 v Labor and Material Bond: $11,000 The Developer is submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreemeat for undergrounding of overhead utilities in the alley on the west side of his protect. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's + Office. A letter of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. Respectf submitted, J L Attachments r, CITY OF RANCHO C(JCAMONGA ri STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 r T0: City Council and City Manager it e` r FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer can BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for �. DR 86 -08 located on the northwest corner of Cottage and Acacia Stre:ts, submitted by Mahlon Sampson RECOMMI110RTIM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting said agreements and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements. AMALYSIS /BACKf.ROUND DR 86-08 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 28, 1986, in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District located on the northwest corner of Cottage and Acacia Street. The Developer, Mahlon Sampson, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performanco Bond: $22,000 v Labor and Material Bond: $11,000 The Developer is submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreemeat for undergrounding of overhead utilities in the alley on the west side of his protect. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's + Office. A letter of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. Respectf submitted, J L Attachments r, i a t: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGI ammG nivmm 1 � kV y , N PTEM: TITLE: oa 86 -o8 yy EXHURT: 11'1lM •M�. it ,I S N PTEM: TITLE: oa 86 -o8 yy EXHURT: s CITE OF RNIM CUCANM IMPfiDRMT AIMEEMENT FOR 1 OR RLN KNOW ALL HEM RT THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Mahlon Sampson hereinafter referred to as the Developer. THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City located on the northwest corner of Cottage and Acacia Streets; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all Improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 moths from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the first anniversary data of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to caplets the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, mad including) a statement of circumstances of necessity for o additional time. In contideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improinent security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. if the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right ar, any tin to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful vans, anu thereupon to recover tram said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. c. Merit Electric Incorporated P. 0. Box 2090 Upland, CA 91766 y� 4J P- � 2 {' J ry .r l / l z S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the OecOer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the - developer shall conduct such work to full compliance rein. Non- compllae result in stopping with the regulations contained, the ro any „ of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right- af-way 'Improvement work required shall be constricted in T. conformance with approved improvement 'plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Draings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or ether incidental work dammed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or omaissions discovered during construc- tion shall be corseted upon the direction of'ths City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications :hall M covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7, Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the ity shall have the right to complete any and all work In the event of unjustified delay to completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8, The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of my component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responslblo for removal of all loose =k and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trams as directed by - the Community Development Director. y, 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee compls:ion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the 'f ' approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: i3 P- � 2 {' J ry .r FA17NM FERFDNNUCE Type: Principal Mount: $22,000 Nan and address of surety: IRiBUL M LABOF Type: ►- `atipa Mount: $11,000 Nam and address of surety: Tp BE POST® PRiOR TO h1=7ANCE BY TIBI CITY s IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures. Developer Date17E�GM,BE.t�r��9t by 74l �'gntalu&c ;?h.,'��Dweloper a nFN M. SAOPSON Accepted: ( City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: . Mayor Attest: City f Approved• City Attorney BEFEi.OPU'S SIUATBRES M1W BE MYiMID:D AM COMPUTER IN TRIPLICATE 3 e. �;_.! - " ':.w.- v,•,ri:';� i9.- �•.wtL4 _:ry'. N'�' f °` ; .I Ilk. CITY OF BRIM CWAUM Gi y. deammm D1VISION t . WCii 11Q16r PWIT FEE SCIIEWU For Improvement: DR 86-01 Cott /Acacia Date: Decemoer 22 1986 Computed by: t File Reference: City Drawing o. p NOTE: laws set l w iorPwsmmt writing Permit deposits f QUANTITY UNIT ITEM PRICE A "T 765 L.F. P.C.C. curb - 84 C.F. 244 gutter 6.00 4 Sf0.00:._ �2 1Zt S.F. 40 P.C.C. sidewalk 1.75 12>�' S.F. Drive approach 2.50 —255 — Z2G11Q ` C.Y. Street excavation 1.50 -9 �JU.3u - 170— S.F. Preparation of wAgrade 0.15 — 74W.W 9j970— S.F. A.C. (3• thick) 0.557 30 L.F. 2 x 4" rodw*od header 1.75 �3G T EA. Street signs 200.00 — --- 7W. >Q a— EA. P.Hlectors and posts 35.00 L.F. Sawcut 2.00 �eD:iR1 S18 855.00 EMOINEEi1N6 INSPECTION FEE 11J00.00 SUB TOTAL *RESTORATION /OELINEATION CASH CONTINGENCY COSTS (I 00 _ice DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) FAITHFUL PERFO0PMCE BOND (100%) MONDMIATATION SURETY (CASH) N/A LABOR MO HATERIAL BOND ($01) *Pursuant to City of Rancho do Phinkipal Cade, Title 1, p�� 1.OB, adapting Sr Bernardino County Cob Titles, Chapters 1 -B; a cob restoration/do depsit shall be mode prior to issuance of am Engineering Caeetre -Vem Matt. Revised 3/84 a`Y e1Y •C.feY E =VrF-n IN TRIPLICATE >\ Y u nW, u.t "r CITY LV AMCIIO Clr`.AM.WA , PRD4CN7 $1,100.00' FAITHFUL FERFOWACE 8000 J) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Stata of ' California, and Mahlon Lampson (hereinafter designated as *principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated ptblic improteamnts, which said 09 - nt, dated _ . 198 . and identified as project OR 86-08 is hereby rtforrod to a part hereof; and, , - WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NW, THEREFORE, we the principal and AMWESR SURErr INSURANCE COMPANY as surety, are held and ftrmly bound unto y of anc o ocamo & (hereinafter called •City), -in the penal sun of twenty -two thousand Dollars (522,000) lawful money of the United States, for ths'payment of which sun well; and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our Min, successors, executors and administrators, ,iointl> and severally, firmly by these presents. , The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its hairs, executors, administrators, successors cr assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well Kid truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and pravisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the m ner therein specified, and in all F respects according tr their true Intent and meaning, and shall inden ify and save harmless City, it fficers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation small biome null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain In full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included, costs and reasonable., expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any juigment rendered. men The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terns of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accoepnying the seem shall in anywise affect itx obligations on this bond, and It does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of ties, alteration or addition to the term of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. this instrument has been duly executed by #a -, principal and surety above named, on December 30 , 196 KAHLQW D 9AMPSON a MAUREEN N SAMPSON AHNfST SUREM IRSURANCL'COKPANY MW aper ) (Surety) _ —�1 one un — (Attorney- ac Mar3]ya Q. C llmla• „ PLEASE ATTACK TOYER OF ATTORNEY TO aLL 80106 SIMAYURES KIST ZE NOTARIZED MIST RE C0VU7ED iR TRIPLICATE G MnW IN TRIPLICATE CITY LAW � UAL no WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Mahlon Sampson •(hereinafter designated as •principal•) have entered into an agreswaent whereby principal agrees to install and complete tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 191 Lad identified as project DR WO1 is r y re err to a PaWT woof; and WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance or the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rands Cocamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 111 (commencing with Section 3062) of Part ♦ of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOM, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material an and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the $r of eleven thousand Dollars (1111,000), for materials furnished or labor :lwreon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unerploymmt Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the sea* in ei amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this band will pay in addition to the fact mount thereof, cuts and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, L: erred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fix,'d by tM court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included In the judpment ther;in rendersd. I+. is hereby expressly stipulated a.•d agreed that•this band shall iiare to the benefit of any and all persons, eo."anles and corporations entitled to the claims under Title 111 (commencing with C•ction 3002 )of Part i of Divison 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the conditicn of this band he fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force end effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no Mang°, extension of time, r alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications ccoepsnying thr safe shall in any mannr affect its obligations on this band, and it does hereby waive notice of any such Mange, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrumeot has been duly executed ba the principal and surety above named, an DECZKM 30 , 1916 ' NANLON SAYPSON a NAURffi N SAMPSON N&= SURi.T2 INSI WaN CMANI (Developer) (Surety) (Signature) Mir t 01(,) ��lte�i aict) ` r. .:a PLEASE ATTACK FaM OF AT1C1110 70 ALL IONS r �° SIMRTIRIES NIST t IOTMIZED =e w . ,,. ORW M CO PLE1EA III TNIPLICATE r/G r ^c�2:i_: may. •�t`�S �'°,' � ., f. x ?3:f* %$" -�' +2 MNw.rr wr.a ERMM111d00rIY1'fworl wrrr • awywueaares rrrr n..�.. rar aw 'd wd 'r" ` n �! AMWWT WAwIY WNWA OlOOWMIY- '. -' b [nit.l[wl auwasra aanacuraw.timrrrau�. wan —. � -¢ O.N io br AWN wO.1� b Lr�rdlrtl MY��.. 7!/Il Mrrn ' w Fran O. Cdr` rtl WrarYNNa1wY`Y WN4ad�Ilra ralY1Y a11N1arOrM► .v `�- aY1� CaWCMartlrwr�w rwlw.WtwN rdrWw'IrdNwaMlydNwwrYYMN Maarr\ tl r.rra rww W awaw NrawaNMOrarwwrrwirrwrL W KN W NlraawM �� raw NbrwrYNwrdwarrr�wWNUYr +pal[NdWN+Y N`rYwrwddlirwlNNM1d - +�� � W rl.rrw Yr YrwI.4 M N w.`raarw Mra d YgO.drrrawaM __ + � Ask artlw Yrwrr FY.aN .IHbrN rrrwr " �tlr.�wr .. p�nacuaow.a. taumvtw areuat —. .,�. � . l w oaawrrra �� w.ra a w �ww1 MMYII rRIR.Yai pWaMP, i CaMww riwr+i!?� MIIInCQlWNNbwrr WaaaYN N. rrarwaw +rrananM4rWwwlMwarar.`wa.r`., w- Nlr N N ONUeaa N N ►alM N w aaarrl w w Ilwa+l.. d w MW r w.rw tl M w w hw rr. 4- p YwAw. Ya4 Flrp � • -. sle+.E4Y:di.�'1�' '� _ - • 1 is �� •' .. �_ ' , _3� 7a,•_ +• ?t61=Ji P.O. u. 4W ` < w�� — M6 CA 91366, F _ / M16704-1111 - 1 X)W Ali$MM Ir1'i11[l1�N10tIL •COIYMIIKN YN WYNr rla�w1011alaar. �1aw - + erwr W rrw wrrN atlr q M w rMa arar. r a ., AR AND ALL Sun w r ry MMIra arwa�ra MwM +rNa ` laarwrtlw.r`r` � -. rrr r.4rM+i w m nwrMa w ' '- wMNrYrN ^! S • Mp rwN � � �ww MNw.rr wr.a ERMM111d00rIY1'fworl wrrr • awywueaares rrrr n..�.. rar aw 'd wd 'r" ` n �! AMWWT WAwIY WNWA OlOOWMIY- '. -' b [nit.l[wl auwasra aanacuraw.timrrrau�. wan —. � -¢ O.N io br AWN wO.1� b Lr�rdlrtl MY��.. 7!/Il Mrrn ' w Fran O. Cdr` rtl WrarYNNa1wY`Y WN4ad�Ilra ralY1Y a11N1arOrM► .v `�- aY1� CaWCMartlrwr�w rwlw.WtwN rdrWw'IrdNwaMlydNwwrYYMN Maarr\ tl r.rra rww W awaw NrawaNMOrarwwrrwirrwrL W KN W NlraawM �� raw NbrwrYNwrdwarrr�wWNUYr +pal[NdWN+Y N`rYwrwddlirwlNNM1d - +�� � W rl.rrw Yr YrwI.4 M N w.`raarw Mra d YgO.drrrawaM __ + � Ask artlw Yrwrr FY.aN .IHbrN rrrwr " �tlr.�wr .. p�nacuaow.a. taumvtw areuat —. .,�. � . l w oaawrrra �� w.ra a w �ww1 MMYII rRIR.Yai pWaMP, i CaMww riwr+i!?� MIIInCQlWNNbwrr WaaaYN N. rrarwaw +rrananM4rWwwlMwarar.`wa.r`., w- Nlr N N ONUeaa N N ►alM N w aaarrl w w Ilwa+l.. d w MW r w.rw tl M w w hw rr. 4- p YwAw. Ya4 Flrp � • -. sle+.E4Y:di.�'1�' '� _ - • 1 is �� •' .. �_ ' , _3� 7a,•_ +• ?t61=Ji lYa • REC=M6 DVJEySSTED „: 'Y WREN RECWU,_w dam, {L TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CIICANeC U ' P. 0. Box 807 RANCHO CUCAiONGA. CALIFOtONIA 91730 IKAL PMM7T VVOOr T CONTRACT MO LIiBI AMEMT THIS AOREEMENT. made and entered into this 31 ST day Of DECEMBER _ 19E6J by and between Mahlon Sampson (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CtCANMGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as •City), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for OR 86-00 develoixeent the City requires undergrounding of overhand utilities adjacent to the property to be developed as required by Planning Commission Resolution No. 86-77; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements until a later data, as determined by the City; and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponwnt provided that the Developer enters into this Agreoment requiring the Developer to construct said unde-•grounding, at no expanse tJ the City, after demand to do to by the City, r% which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said i) undergraundibg if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that the City Cr; =: Merit Electric Inc # P 0 Box 2090 ' ; -,• +rt!} Uplar-d CA 91786 rx shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City, i NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that he will underground (1/2) one -half the overhead utilities along the alley located on the west side of the project in accordance and ccopliance with all applicable ordinances i r resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to cemnence installation of the same. Ip::allation of said improvements shall be + at no expenso to the City. J. In the event the Developer shall fail or refuse to complete the installation of said improvements in a timxly manner, City may at any Live +' thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the ` • Developer. t , r 4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and " conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City'of any funds :{ which may be expanded by City in completing said improvements upon default by 3;L the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described real property`' U. .lh 'J,r ^.i1'" .11°i�..�'. l �'.`�,R`'• w, . 1 .'sv.:."��`4:'� -`: X-Ai," sitated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San 8arnardino, State of L^ California, to -wit: Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8179 S. This conveyance is In trust for the purposes described above. 6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance r- I shall be void, otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a eortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State cf California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereU. 8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term 'Developer' shall be 'mortgagor' and the City shall be the 'script"* as those torus are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and arty other statute pertaining ;. Artgages on real property. • t r�Lr� 't 'i• °S vy � Hri� wry a �,'�i_✓k.(i'4G�� i�"at�x't rs_n�:�`n?�:'�;.- ,�:m..� .- ,. ., , :,�.,,.f:,�S�,t.•.' e3T2.ct� z 9. If legal action is cownced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to MOW any sum which the City Is entitled to recover from Y the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover Its costs and such reasonable attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. { CM DEVELOPER CITY OF RANCW CDCAMON&, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: Dennis L. S57u Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FOAM } ewCitty Clerk a r+�eY S a y�. �t A [1 4� 1 J a RESOLUTION NO. 91- 01V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 36 -08 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on December 30, 1986, by Mahlon Sampson as developer, for the' improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Cottage and Acacia Streets; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvenonts, described •in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 86-08; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R. 4, 1 6 �Y r. is s• re. i• kt � Jr. RESOLUTION NO. 87 —O"S t RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAYCHO CUCAIONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPRCVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MAHLON SAMPSON, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -08 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Development Review No. 86 -08, located on the northwest corner of Acacia and Cottage Streets, submitted by Mahlon Sampson was approved on May 28, 1986; and WHEREAS, Undergrounding of overhead utilities, established as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit, has been met by entry into a Real Property !mproveaent Contract and Lien Agreement by Mahlon Sampson. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Imprcveaent Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. r Fl. r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �,° +. C > DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager rsrr FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 8902 (DR 85 -23) located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road, suhmitted by Berry Construction Incorporated. RECOPMORTIa It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting said agreemeert and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /9ACKGROUNO Parcel Map 8902 was approved by the City Council on April 2, 1986, for the division of 3.15 acres into 2 parcels in the Office /Professional Development District located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. The Developer, Berry Construction Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: SB9,000.00 Labor and Material Band: $44.500.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. t Respec fA34y submitted, �T Attachments ' S. � S f 4SV`k PEEWEE �� .,��C�.>(Y.X:�f.NK•`ti. �`ts�lrii`IG:. >.'6,r � ".:ui!. .� .. .Lhi: '•'r`,y'rih•�}:��•y�'�( n 1 i r ti f: r Jr SSA � I O i 4•I / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BNGDdEERIIdG DIVISION SS r I� f� �p ;l i `3 t t Gam` F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT • FOR PARCEL MAP 8902 XNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, to conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and negulatlons of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr- ed to as the City, by and between said City and a -rry +mtr mtlen. Ineo nonrated hereinafter referred to as tho Deve>oper. THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City located on the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road ; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements fer the purpose of securing said approval. ROW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at deve:oper's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In considera- tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adJustsents thereto when warranted by substantial cha:.ges therein. . r 1921 u Ilth ST Upland CA 91786 1 a' S6 zLL. ? 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any tree to cause said provisions to be completed by any law= ful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or s, his Surety the full cost and expense incurred In so doing, S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Bevel- '.• oper from the ofOice of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -cf -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Mon - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided, 6. Public right -of -way improvement work required shall be constructed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or on Issions discovered during construc- tion shall be corrected upon the dirertion of the City inginear. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Mork done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the s Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 1 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any component of any irriggation water system in conflict with the required work to the satls' action of �1. the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. c 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of #^ all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 30. The Developer shah plant and maintain parkway 4 trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The prin- c1pal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: 4 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE ,••""� Type: Principal Amount: $74,000.00 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Principal Amount: $37,000.00 { Name and address of surety: z CASH DEPOSIT MDOUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: $ 1,300.00 Name and address of surety: TO •E POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these Presents to be duly executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures. + Date //C by i'Y1 a.a.a_ tJ sia.cy Developer •�--- i —"Printed is Date by , Developer amore R r n ,) Accepted: Ci`y of Rancho Cucamonga, California j A Municipal Corporation % By: w Mayor 4 F_ Attest: y er Approved: City Attorney • . rYl DEYELO►ERDS SIBNATBRES MUST bE NOTARIZED r•`' ANR COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE R ;< ' 3 `.•'yo1�{'jt :( ,, Lei �4f f. aY r + ' .. ^, ..'10.1 t N'3E,.'a;4 `ti >' +t}� ,, ea x•v>. « -�7;'_ r, =ks: 6 t 11 t WAATITY UNIT IT[A PAI[[ AVOJTT ' - CUT Of Am(3tD COCAan" -- ENGUILERIIG DIVISION - - EMAOPL191EIIT plimtT FEE SCIIEOIILE fee leprovexat• 6.00 Date: Fl le Re i Create: . �.aa tasuu 0 /:....., .�. Cltf n= Oraslnq Tara ,; ' +• ' -- - -- P.C.C. curb only NOTE: Does not Include current fee r= J Kiting peralt or paraamt do, ,osl is 11 t WAATITY UNIT IT[A PAI[[ AVOJTT A.C. or p 1300 tons) 27.00 P.C.C. curb - IZ• C.f 24• gutter 7.25 _ L.F. F.C.C. cu'!; - A• C.f 24• gutter 6.00 S.F L.F. P.C.C. curb only 5.50 J L.F A.C. Gera 4,50 i LIM- S.F. P P.C.C. sl4valt 1.15 EA. ��aaen� S.F. S.F. Delve 40proacn e• 2,50 .�� bJut: eater valves to grade - P.:C, oast gutter (Inc. curb) 1.40 - p C.T. Street eacav4tion 1,550 �- '� C.T. 'CM7- SF laterite ma antatnt P 1.50 ' S.F rep+ratlan of su redo Crufeed 199. base per Inch thick) 0.15 0.07 .300 TON A.C. or p 1300 tons) 27.00 iCn A.C. 900 to 1300 tors) MOD TON 1.1 TON A.C. 500 to 9W tons) GS.W S.F A.C. unoor $00 tons) 60.00 n .M S.F A.C. 13' talc) Patch A.C. (trench) 0.55 1.75 1.75 21525_ S.F. P tblck P.C. overlay y EA. Adjust tower eaMOlo to grape 2SO.W •xn EA. AdJust serer clam W[ to grade 150.00 _ [A. bJut: eater valves to grade 75.00 -- - r_ EA. , Street llgn[s 1000,00 L.F. e BaKlcad. (Int[ntt. SSW sin) 1.00 L.F 2 s• reared beaear 1.75 S.F ReeKal of A.C. pareaant 0.33 --W- L.F. Reaoval of P.C.C. curb J,30 L.F RMv%l Of A.C. berg 1.00 -W-- __ EA. FA. Street signs Reflectors and posts 200.00 MOO L.F. Concrete blocs wall MOO S.F. Retaining call 10.00 �- TON Ag9ngsta base C.T. Concrete structures 425,00 L.F. 18• RCP OW 0) 29.00 L.F. 21. 1CP 1500 0) - 35.00 L.F. 10• RCP 2000 0 49.00 L.F. 48• RCP 1200 0) 78.00 St. Catch basin Y • a' 2000.00 EA. Catch baste w 1 8' EA. Catch basin Y • 22' aSOp,Op EA. _ Local depression a' - EA. Local dopMtslpn 12' - 1000.00 EA. '%Mtlan structure 5000,00 - -- EA. Outlet structure, Std 1508 1500.00 EA. outlet structure, $to P507 500,00 _ EA. Guard ports 40.00 em LF Used (wad) MOO �tmet 'I4atwall 2.00 �- EA. (48• wing) 4000.00 - r - L.F Reomod holder 2.75 ZTO6- S.F. Landsciphp fl Irrigation 2J5' _ i2.2ia L.F. Roll curb CP.C.C.) MINEERtNO-INSPECTIG7 FEE A TOT7L +\ TOUnCY. e2ESTOIIATICNOELINEAitCR 7. �$3-.4�55.00 -' ,•.. CASH -M COI COSYY - OEPOSI IAEfuNBABLE Oa RKCATICA SIRETY FAITNFOL PERE 09JWICE ICASN) 51,300.00 - BO[9 ( LABOR AND PATUTAL 8070 (S0IOC.) Ce laTitl Cue a 1l +1 Cote, Title I, Uaptte 1.00, eM; tl Seca` Mnea.HlM CeettY [eft Titles, puptert 1.5, a u :A ratoretlon y 1.5 OORQ Prior to tsSw+ece /dellaeatlen Of AN fnRineerlq Coustrectlan ►eMlt. deMSIt.W1i 1:, •; iE.3.•�-n.,,�i K`;;.. Spa ?d.n`..R:. .S,'W r - - yj,tii' r•rr .ribr. if'Wi c/ NHUUS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cues*"&. State of California, and BERRY CONSTRUMOR INC. Z ainafter design i�u sI. 0c pa Eve en er n o an agrwecn r y principal ayraas to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agram t, dated NOVEMBER 13 1996 and identified as project Parcel 140 8902 is reit�ire errea zo am lame a part hereof; and, CITY OF NNW COCAIN" FAIiWK Rll►ONN M M 07601210 PAESCN S 666.00 WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and THE ANERICAn INsumcE CMTANY as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the city Of anu:o Cucamonga (hereinafter called •City), in the penal sum of 22vjfltZ;f2Vr thousand, Dollars iawfui money S o aisles, or a payment Arch sum we cur., ru y to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors end adalnistrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obliyatia principal, his or its heirs, executors shall to all things stand to and abide the covenants, conditions and provi alteration thereof made as therein prt and performed at the time and In th respects according to their true rote save harmless City, its officers, agen then this obligation shall becgma nut remain in full force and effect. is such that if the above bounded administrators, successors or assigns, y, and well and truly keep and perform ons in the said agreement and any Ided, on his or their part, to be kept manner therein specified, and to all and meaning, and shall indemnify and and employees, as therein stipulated, and void; otherwise, it shall be and As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall to included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City to successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the tares of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or tin specifications ace Anying the sees shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, andeft does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the tmrk or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, an NOVEMBER 13, , 196 6 BERRY CONSTRUCTION INC. (Developer) tbignature) PLEASE ATTACH M ANERICAt. 0SORANCE COMPANY OF ATTORIV 10 ALL 80N0S ., wv�, R w�u.•c. sue .w,r u.w,c r _ 3/17/86 � , I THE iMER1CAN DWALANCE COMPANY • KNOW ALL Mpl RY ==PRlllNM This THE AMRRICAN DIBURAMM COMPANY. a CwPwwW yy wpaabd W erUy seen the ' law of the Sae, of Nm Huey. W earba IN yrwlpM a1ee Is Im Chy W Cmq d Er Incises. CYFww. eat We. a d W sPPei.wt. W sees 41 ass Is sweat owe. ttwwvc W MPNaI EIERNARD NAFTEL, FRED E. SMITH and JAMES P. JEFFOPDS Jointly or BBrarelly Revs WYotuf AnwcHe Fan. sXbftl psnWatnMttY balfby edmrlb Mrwe. PlaeWNW,wawlw. wel.MarftyeeM 4 aw say W w beats. . waPbaatet Be fwt Mrs sagas I,*, W w W the Cwptatfaa OWN Maly W w w tar ewe r E weh beds wle swd by w PledBew. mw well or ewpentf and dw Cwperataa W NY RmNE by RwwwY. MIT" II() w w - i r w re NIB mmwSNwrm l my M in Oe PrtrNt. Tbit putt d away b Ir.J psawa w Aniek VIII. SecGw M W 71 of Br4rs d THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY aw M feel Ows W rr"L ^AddavUL A/piswsl WAawalpAadwfatverY. WA/auspbnlwe WApawaaapLgdhwes W WRYAAPawaawe. Sww M, A"Worrf. TM CtaRor of De MW of DRww ;1Be PrawaL toy YRrJrrYut a say aba pw mt aawelwt by dw loud of DMaarae* OW 4 Met Of D&KWM IMF w My VMhisMuL no. Rea teat to ear. OPW Res" Arlan Satwarin W Avatwye4w?m r eelnewt W w W W Be beWl of At Cwpundn W Aawa w rW+ 49 Pwtrs W rM appwn'ea few W w b"of lm Celpwuim Battles SI. Avikaft The A,&Ieky By Each RmWta ArW - Smith. Amwy%4gaL W Abwu Yal be Be pm Is the lutnwrt e•Itndap tMe eppawa m4 W wy"appeiwpNal W Y away Hued Ibeee I an Be mdeJ st eery, teat by the DeW tt D mm w by Baypawe eayeeadw We Pak ypWwt.' Tbn of owes M tfrN W mw se6t W By w mbs," d at fe" M+W We NMN y Be Mat d D. d THE AMERICAN INSL'R U COMPANY r s amW My ere W bdl w Y MO iY M feSawM. Nw. W W/ RewYiw W as beat aateaMt w rryeew: -RESOLVED. chu w d say Yae•htiWm. AWttaa StQVWY. W Rrwer Atahuat Swwwy d dit O10wwba. W w NO d Ibis Caprawa atey M aDad w Nwd west p.er d uta•ay. r rY mwaw d rY pw +d atoewY, w r r! anicae rtweii tbnns. bt fan+rlt. W say peon of UNMY. al%mmanoa d my pnwe d nurwy. Be cm&w warty such fanJNe WWfff a IK"* No SLAB h Vale W Natty We w Corprwba IN WITNESS WHEREOF. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY late oats Ibm prtaau to M tiBwt b ea Vwfdeniteat. WWawpmetetultpbe Bnwwuh.dutt 24th Mead OCtobar 19 83 ,^y1 THE �AMERICA' .4�INSURLA14(C�E'CCOMMP,A�N,Y •1 Wee R/ STATEOFCALTFOR.WL j CRY VNDCOLTTVOFSAY FRANCISCO /)a IN WITNESS WHEREOF.IYre Weswwt rY WU W aIBW ry atitW sees. w YY W yarMrA W aben srivw. OFFKTAL SEAL WIMY SYA/Ei IL am Fc&,C�,lmtx,kqmNw.II."lw I B y SIa" IEITPICAR STATEOFCAIJIM%ft 13a C try A'®COt \Tea0►SAN ERANNLY) L tw esdvsbW. RNteN AM" &VM217 of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. • NEW JERSEY Cwpaat4a. 00 HEREBY CER• TIFY that w fwgalap rd ura W POWER OF ATTORNEY eeaWa in fw wra ere W w Mr Ie•oed: W fmbnwe Wt MNr VIII. Sat• Iba MW 11 ofIee Byb+aofW CorpowlW,s dwRtwlurat of to MW NDrenay. M fenb in to PriseAllwX7, we sr is gum SqW WSaw At t4 CbywlCowy@ISM Ftwlwa. Deal w 13th &Yet NOVEMBER 46 ANwaaanry . �Mp11•TMStl - - yup IT • THE AMERICAN INSUP_1NC8 ,COMPANY tom•' �. �2 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND �q PraM $" 135. 01) r•' To M aearA�d b aW 6a yal d lad No 7407210 mkrard THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAY.ONGA, STATE OF CALYEORNT4 HEREBY UNDERSTOOD BOND IS INCREASED BY $15,000.CO FROM $74,000.00 to $$89.000.00 41 ca�.a rm .'� FOR ALL INCIDENTAL WORK NECESSARY FOR REVISIONS TO DRAWINGS 1017, CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AT THE is SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SAN SERNARDIHO ROAD AND GROVE AVENUE. J a i= 6. DECEMBER U. 1986 � a T►Y r1ArYdf.aflnsdawed a1aNltlrsryaG4dln aL armb"Yawi THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 35 M+ y 1 J P. JHFYORDS c�V ATTORNEY -IN -FACT i T�fi 11a�.e1M'. .l� "�1f?�'...`c.a.y� _.:��'?4?:. ^:'r .la:,_> . _ ! 1 . r .ttc�c.'a�,rt.r�x• r `na A10QiECAN tNRlRANCE COMPANY yes resoles M+: Parer � at INSURANCE *.r CC�1" a:.1.1Y...'cW++R�. W' e'. .� BEJMJARD WIFTELa FRED E. SMITH and JAMES P. JEFFCRDS Jointly or savdrally bsvwwAWW AOrrN ►w.MditA POA1fW oYaway a.wY 0660 r OOodn Y W ttwdkJa Dore. PYnWrM.roY,YS.1w.wees.4lPeW .�'. Idrof rPWY1aor. looa/OSWw/Modes wtlaea W +er wrwr'r� a+ v r Say awl to vat rsum w ri 9owth bbw ww "pod yftA / —.w W with �OiMmpm*eY1l of Mr rds=X Dewy Y waa.ad PYIPtot Y Atdt VHI.l rdoe )• W )I of ariw oI THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ves is fY Iafw W w. `Aeddt YDL AA/PMr,a "AtiwOPAasfroYrrPriL todAargi.M W A/wrr taowlletihwlr oMMW AOPoIPatr• hales X A/wdrwL Pat CkPsw = 20 Resod st DaotlolC des huMseL on YiwdPmbdwt w tor odes Press sedrrad M ow cord W LL DOwrvdA pies "des Resod of DbKMm M he MM w or YY.twdAwt sop, Roes des w daao. OPP11M Iotidrl AwIftm Sw ON W AuwwvN 4stx w toMOSSr W w lee W ft kWf M des CirrwWa W Apw w ~ YwA Yfoes11 W rM MPrrr Nr W r b"441 shgowdse. for es )1. Au"do TY AMYM) et wd RoMM AYYYr EYNr, At woop4 �fYL W Ap11 YY M Y PfworElod w dm bwvw%t "Mwaly ** 1M Joma W rP oat "pi.rr W Y aodof4 ETNA ow* no w I,"ked Y oq Yes H do Roatd M Dkwra w h DoT gOwoeswmos• w w MGM oath yPeYrM." ABM poI INSURANCE COMPANY W mw WA" W M OA W. -..*P of 0. J=Mn4Yr adgNd ►rY Dow of Dinars N THE COMPANY M • aesnkw OMIT rWd W wM es df )Id T of Ielwrlot. MIO. W wM RnoMNe W eM w:o SWAM" w tgowO: 'REDOLVED. des dA 'rpwm of wT Vko•hnWt L Aukato StafMn. W UsIdtr AHWW SneorY of dN CoeprYLo. wd rte wH of t►is Ce iftsaybeasuderrim wotrw, r 'ttv MOifw W'wo— I.Mcm4ribu- j 'f YI r YNSWp'xo�ie >OfocwafN�iN `WIIM nbd W b"m wpm dr Copwatw. M WITNESS WHEREOF. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY W crud OAY PnuoN M at OOW b) Ns VimPnsiMr. Wwm'sum am 0INbN malTW ti 24th Pelf October it RS _ n THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY STATEOFCALRORNIA. 1 CRYA 0Co ttryor"MFlumum ` Ott" 24th day of October N 83 MwtmpmDoaR7nw Richard Williams q r )ttna. Ne k Y y r rdl s.sn. des deoolt W uP• dq 4 YZ9d-hn4ot of THE AMERICAN IN)URANCE COV PA%Y. thf Cw- 67nies dntaO" L rQ.YU CUC the ion wunAr: tot Y kr s tM rl H uld Corp tm; Wt tM"Oftud w tM YM Isury .Net /wllfYrprlYw: tut Y tY MofflW ►7 order w uA aesY "DinnonNaW CwPwuM aM dot M ty,d w esrtwwo y wf wen. L4WITNESSWHEREOF.1Ynbt way WWoRWmyo ikWttr.rAdoTW7ewwnieivalon%AUM .a�rESWNSrat OFFICIAL �{p iria1E�TMRrNu (CAINNORM /O '" cvo 4w 4pY Mw' 17, MN CERTIPKATZ ETATEOFCALQ'ORMA. 1 Cm JVWCO1L7NRYaS4NFRAN000O 1. W 6"MIS d. RnWM AttluoY SNrwry of THE AMERICAN INSURA7.Y'E COMPANY, a NEW JERSEY Cwpndoe. DO HEREIT CER• TIFY thm tw twnoi s W atrW POWER OF ATTORNEY IerAt In fY fore W W W wes nn,"; W fanwtrwa that Ankh YIIL See tiM load HtwI7Lnoltw CorPratlee.W the Reratge of IM IM4 of Dirngn. w fad M the Pa St Almm.wea morn. rva WU *dM Imck7aM Cowry DIUR rnwiuo. Dad the 11th day DECEMBER H 86 V. :�. 63 CITT IiF 1= = LAW TAW Ale IHRTERGIAIIIi tiliiHO P 1407210 WHEREAS, the City Council of the city f Rancho Cucemoega, state of California, and Sauer CONSTRUCTION INC. (Mrelnatter designated as 'K FIC III en n o em agreemen y principal Waits to Install and LORI certain designated wblic improvements, which said agreement, dated NOryJO)aR 13 SM 6 and identified as project _Parcel sae 902 15 1111 refeirred to and mae'a part Mreof; and W"WAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the rformemce of the work, to file a good and sufficient Payment effereenceois with wode in T1t1eof Rancho CuCy 1& Section the claims ai Tart Lich Division J o the Civil code of the State of California. of are held firmly bbound intprincipal the ity o Rancho Cuc� as a corporate Ill con aunty, subcontractors, labortrs, material men and other Persons all contractors, performance o the aforesaid a persons employed 1n the greeaentd rthrred to in the aforesaid Code of Civ11 Procedure in the sue o iMr usand dollars and o0 /100 ants Dollars (S37 000.00), for aweterta s urns or aaor thereon aRy�cin�ar for amounts 2W un r the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the saw in on amount not exceeding the &I herainabeve set forth, and also in use suit 1s brought upon this band will pay in addition to the face +moult thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneyiis fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be warded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included to the Judgment therein rendered. It 1s hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure tv the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file the lCivil Code tsulas tog etagright ofcactionDto� then orttheir assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The alteration roryadditiontto theet terms offesaid that no agreement ors extension of accompanying the awe shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEP.EOP, this Instruvent has been duly executed 8 ti the j principal and surety above named, on NOYMER 13, 1 BMULY CONSTP.uCrIOH INC. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY (Dave ] RV aty ure �� orne y a , JAMES P. JEPFO S i• PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTOItl1EY To ALL SM SIVATURES MiST K 111TARIZED MST E COMPLETED IN 71IPLICATE �5 3/I7/86 r �R1�i 71tMliMICAWWRMANINCiOb ?ANY wAUF�HwT�leoonalTrTHR 1Nwularitw�ANr ..b�dwr�w.dwa.lwyaker � Aan W r Rlar of w.1...7. w yW.YY k �Y r CTV r M Ye W aaaak. Maalkral W fleaf.r.rwwy bar l.nrar laak.iawliaae�id U1IMARD NIFTELe FRED E. WITH and JAMES P. JEFFMS Jointly or severally + knee Wla.hl Aer OK .ib fAv• wA knSf wdmd Ykaaow. PYw"done. waafowe.eaal. wk".kdw"d 04 - a" ad as bwwl. 7M1/YrwewerfwMerylYw lararaw reM ....w.................. rr�drMadrf rnMyyflbrWwraare era" nr MYra wYrrnRaJkr. raM oilArwalraw a4 aft [wTwdM W d�"wrwwd y k kawrr. kaay waYtka ri AIIwrKIIYIrt r7 /a Y r Merfw. F � trwu7rSrau"laaoa"1w Aaeba Ynll.SwOoMW71 MR rk.aWTHE AMERICAN MIMMCECOW ►ANY w YM Al"MAXWwwfWAar14Asobosw eNa , wdAawPW4l n=dAlwnrww t4WAewrwMMwAop a+• Saadw SA A1NY1arl The CSbaa" M r a.ed of DYrawa, r ►awlfrL w Yk.fwaMaa: w aq obw paws awWkd y r Bard of akaaawrr fYkrr W r Eaad W DkwlwA r fwYr w aq YYMIwMw/ now. Dew air r eke. a1fMw Rdara Aaokral Sunwin W Aaawp*4W r mrP W as AN W M bAW of r Cw1Mdn W Ae+ w ooeaw ked lawew W mde alewaaaar ke r" IAalfalrfr/wdm %Wm 71. As"*. Tk Aa W ft N sub ROWN AmblMl SoNaawlea, Aewwwea haa. W APW aW be r FaeerI Y r ia"ww wMaft OA gPoY"MC W w7 FA a1PaYlrew Was eelawy /arM r"by raj k ""It" r my bw by r Sawd of Dkw w H 7rTiME��rEfa wompr•ww w�alom""Awvswwrl" ka�.y ANRl11CAN INSSU wRANCE COMPANY & a r LliYC My Nr�k1i "tike 7M i7 WW" MMyar WA of Us W bm aw.dw ww/ea, : alb Owparkr. W r Uhl of Ae M rl Z=1=01= k A w+a k M WITNESS WHEREOF. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY W aaeW bew pra7ra Y be yr l y Ra Vs f rokal. W kwFwwWwk►NmuaMsN bb 24th da7N October 11 83 _ THE AAM „ERRICAANNINSURANCE 'COMPANY STATEOFCALfrOR. \lA. CITY ANDCOLKWOFSANTM.YLTICO J` 1.4 WfTNESS11T1EREOF.I"k.mwM orykdWdad my olkW” IM k7W raw kxk MI abw .%dam OFFKTAL REAL Yr CeWliae 4aer Mw. 17. HM CERTIFICATE STATLOFCAIJIM4M j CTTY&4DCCKN"OtSANMA4CNW 1 1. ba adny�V, Rallm Ank w SN ry N THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY a NEW JERSEY Cwvwalbe. DO HERESY CER• TIFY r1 be fona(olal W anabd POWER OF AT70RHEY ar k%Y h0 fwn W kl eel fete aneld; ad fonAnrwa IMI Ankk YIII. Sen 11ew M W 11 wbe e7Ynef W CsrpruiM, W bt Rtwlwbe of be Soud o /Okeneal. M IoM Y Ikfa.aa of Anweq,ua w Y fan. TyW WNOWU1kCy odfaarywSu ►aaeakw DaW be 13th day*( NOVEMBER It WU MMI4TAS11 � {' .7• CO J ' xt !,+i •rte: ..:., :r .. J __ ___ . „Y, �''1! TILE AMERICAN INSURANCE CWANY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA LABOR AND NATERIAUIXN BOND mm To be 60 MW is Ra111 Rd Me 7607210 d b.a THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE MIT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. STATE OF CALITORNIA HEREBY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED R f. a�n,/aAt BOND IS INCREASED BY $7,300.00 FROM $37,000.00 TO $46,500.00 FOR-ALL INCIDENTAL NOR[ NECESSARY FOR REVISIONS TO DRAWINGS 1017, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AT THE SOUTH EAST OMER OF SAN BERNABDINO ROAD AND GROVE AVENUE. Tlu.Wa YMau "mad DECEMBER U. 1986 .adwA tlMa WdAM In to ai.A.d bo A THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 � 7AffiS F. RD ATTORNEY -IN -TACT 1 ��e.u.<., fie' ,,.�,t2z•� •�' � ;Sa ± i4� �• 1 .a:* TIEAMMICANTNSMANCECOMPANY AD' iA ALL MO/ W TRICK FIItlRxlM WA THE AMERICAN DraLMANCE COMPANY. A CwFwrr M�r/YW w..Yiy rM ye n.0 d w slew w No. im". W b ft r 11drled 04 Y w City W Core/ d sr In.err. CW W eWe, ~AOed W 0eP0hwd. W der by wr ww.n row. 0worw W e1Pr /OKW MRFTIL, FRED E. SMITH Red JAMES P. AFFORDS Jointly or severally M rw W Y.Id Anwwllr Iwo whe he po. and mapky ae.y rrdrM Yfr wr. elrrwewr.rrstgw. rd.rW.lideeW daMe rl W r MMO. twoPrrO w otlrr w,a1e elhPirr Y w err. rend .........��...- .......,... f Wrww �wriwdwyi rAdl/Wrwrr me EustRng;adA woerrd ftem"a .rder.o IN *9P ewddr. Cxeeero WCAy reed 4 r swwrr7. rr.�7 nr/YI W r.r.:R r rr w rr�rpr/+►.a.n r Y w Ir.ru. Tfu /wee Ig wuy Y was" Irrrr a AMCY VRI. SH484 M W 11 d Orb-%d THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY w Y W /ww W era �Aed6 VDL AMOYeare WAOdwR►A1WretwrY4 WArrrpYJlr WAdwrwrpNLddlSww W MwAlerrwa 7we0o M. AM.Mrc Tk CMReor d M Rwd Of Deere4 Of ►rrldrR4 of vlr11wllr w re sd r vv 1 rd.wYd M do srW d Oww lk W11"r Of w Rrrd of Drww. w Pewldlr w w VY►Pm Mme. M. Ire der r dr..wdr R1rYr ArMrt SwrstN W AvwwpJ►he r tgwut W Ar W W m WbWt of w Cremft W Apr r reel bed 110400 W SIM eeerwnr Ye W wa a b"41da CwFrrfr. Ere010. M. appow •• The ad my d ew► RrdMr ed A a Swnrlir, Aerrraby aw be "Ad N y d s r et+ard Y w Y w by ` ..Nerd tldr wF0Y0rw. W w wr rF►.Yrr W r Wtwy "W OrA7 0r/ w erodd r r7 des b de Mrd d DYewO w q w P7�rwo r0r7.rwwlNxry wNM eywWd we W awl.^ /1st To* AAMEEICAN 11W"S ASS COM7 YY Y i rye 1MWM1Ay' 0 Md W MY w he 7M i7 IOPrw�IM/yW wl�eiw4W�w w Mi .wrMd w "Plow: - RESOLVED.1101 w Wrwe d w VW.hriw. Arirr lrrnv7. W EnKr MdOrr Swrnw7 d W0 CrP+Ye. W w ud of M carp"w or .w.r i.. aw,eid~r.0 T. ft t w s rr lr►ir ndwi0crwlt 0wrrw0 w l rFolui., A aiw N IN WITNESS wHEREOf. THE AMERICAN IMUW#CE COMPANY W rwd ww "wests r be deed b) Its VXnPweideu. W b ewPeww w►0Mrrlo dnrd 9Y ZAtA kl l October 19 113 THE AMERICA% INSURANCE COMPANY ETA TEOFCALIFOlv1A. a CRY AvD COLTRY OF Xv FRA'bL0 4v KTTNESY K11ERtOF.1 YwRtnro M wllyd W rlW gMeldwale V7 W 7rllrer Rne Jwr.rl: OFFICIA ILLGtJ�6t4T DDTIIr PWK fA�pM aw d reel~" Air lwrn rr [w1.iw tw0w Ilw. n, trM CRATHKATE STATCOFCALRORMA. 1 a CRYA`WCOL\TYOFSANrRANCMCO 7 L W rdrddW, RNMrr AstNUM torten d lti[ AMERICAN DfSURANCI COMPANY.. NEW JERSEY CweweW. DO MIREIY CER• Ify Tdmia od 311*l *like g, .I. dOeCwPeEro. W w Radwirfeef tww Mud of OkKw4 e:i WI G�i /1~ dMUrw.wl ooe. Ankle .1145rt Vlwdudmf duweRTWCwuTdSu ►1rd0r Owedw 11th day of DECEMBER . 86 . l�N RrMUAwrw Wnv7 1 ERm1•TA•Eal �Yrr 6' RESOLUTION N0. 21-61b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU.AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 8902 (OR 85 -23). WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on December 16, 1986, by Berry Construction Incorporated as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property _specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of San 8ernardino Road and Grove Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done 'v conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planniq Commission, Parcel Map 8902 (DR 85 -23); and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified In said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that ,31d Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Secu. ;ty be and the sane are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY, Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 84 -12 located at the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Etlwanda Avenue submitted by Patscheck /Hackbarth Development Company. RECOMMENDATIOR It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution , accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND DR 84-12 was approved by the Planning Commission on April 24, 1985, in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District located at the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Etlwanda Avenue. The Developer, Patscheck /Hackbarth Development Company is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $430,000.00 Labor and Material Band: $215,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. ResD submitted, R . Attachments G9 0 A .y '•5 L .Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGMERING DIVISION 07o C:V- N CITY OF RA MM CNCNOM IilRO ONINT ABRMOT FOR OR 8442 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamongs, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafterfjd to as the City, by and between said City and Patscheck / Hackbarbh hereinafter referred to as the developer. THAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City located Northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Etivanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent 44 prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follons: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developers expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2. This cgreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the invement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful weans, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 640 North Tustin Avenue Ste 103 Santa Me, CA 92105 _ A K 'J/ ' S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance k with the regulations contained therein. Non - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. ' 6. Public right -of -way improvement work required shall be constructed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and aa' Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall L" include any transitions and/or other incidental work dammed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or omissions discovered during construc- tion shall be corrected upon the direction of the City, Engineer. Revised work Gee to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. n 7. Mork done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the evert of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. B. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any component of any irrigation water systez in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the t water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Coamnity Development Director. d 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to U guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: h 1 L_ Nom' w� Y to s. rA eu FA17 FUL PERFORMANCE Street Improvement■ Type: Storm drain Improvements Principal Mount: $830,000 Name and address of surety:. Developers Insurance Co. 333 Wilshire Ave. Anaheim,Ca. 92801 MBNTERIAL AND LANK Type: Street Improvements Principal Mount: $215,000 Storm drain Improvements Nam and address of surety: sane TO 8E POSTED PRIOR TD ACCEtrMNCE By THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their t1 to Date 11/24/86 by Developer Signature 1yyM: nd R. Patscheck Date 11/2 <�6 DY Developer gna ure a W0Ff Rark = n Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation 8y: Mayor Attest: City er Approved: City AtForney DEVELOTFR'S SIGNATURES MUST OE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETE) IN TRIPLICATE 7.a w1! 4 For I Date: F1 It 2,571 61_ - 3'357.4 - 6 Y.906- CITY OF WKNO QK'AUM "MI)IR.Nf 1IMSlq ENCROACI M MMT FEE SCNWU ROTE: Oses not iaclode CM. an fee for writing parvidt or P 4 deposits L.F. F.C.C. curb - 8• C.F. 240 gutter L.F. A.C. ben S.F. 40 P.C.C. sidewalk S.F. 8• P.C.L. cross gutter (inc. curb) C.Y. Imported aabankeent TON A.C. (over 1300 tons) EA. Adjust water valvas to grade S.F. Resoval of A.L. paveeent L.F. Rowel of P.C.C. curb LS PAMVAi of Channel Wingwalis EA. Street sign EA. Relocate Traffic Signal EA. Reflectors and posts TON. to base L.F. { ' R P 1200 p L.F. 3Y RCP 2000 0 L.F. 21• RC► 1500 0 L.F. 360 RM 2000 D L.F. 420 RCP 1200 0 EA. Catch basin W • 28' EA. Catch basin W • 7' EA. Catch basin W • 214 EA. Local depression 41 EA. Junction structure Std 510 EA Naehole A (Hodiffed) EA Partial Reconstruct Driveways S.F. Grouted Rip Rap L.F. Sawcut C.Y. Wingwall C.Y. Rect. Channel 4 -51, W -10' EA. Side Drain Cann. To Channel LS Intersection Etiwanda Ave, and Arrow Rte. Drainage Improvewnt G.00 4.50 1.75 3.40 1.50 27.00 75.00 0.35 3.30 200.00 10,000.00 35.00 7.00 72.00 35.00 49.00 62.00 5000.00 2500.00 4200.00 500.00 5000.00 1500.00 1500.00 200.00 2.50 2.00 200.00 270.90 300.00 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE SUB TOTAL *R DEPOSIT II /EFUIDABLE)IOI CASH CONTTINGENCENFOSTS 100%. (100%) MONUNENTATION SURETY (CASH) LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (50R) Kwrtu"t a City of AMM dcaeonga Municipal Code, Title I, Maapter 1.00, a knWro" C uNtr CNe Titles, Chapters 1 -0, a cash restoration /dattaestien do be =do prier to isWAWA of an Eegi"Wing Caastroction FaMt. _. I v 5.000.00 Bond No: 9398775 Premium: $6,880.00 CITY OF RANCiID CUCAMONGA FAITHFUL PERFOUME BOND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Patscheek /Hackbarth ( (hereinafter designated as 'principal ") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated November 24 198_6, and identified as project DR 84 -12 fT TeRrAy —re err o and maaF a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we as surety, are held (hereinafter called "C thousand Dollars (5430, of which sum well an successors, executors these presents. co. sue of four hundred and the United States, for the , we bind ourselves, our jointly and severally, ft The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, adainlstrators, successors or assigns, snall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions to the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided; on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the w;ner therein specified and in ail respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees. as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City to successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications acc anying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and�t does hereby waive notice of any sueh change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on November 24 , 1986 . DEVELOPERS INSURANCE CCe4ANY k Me vesper very 7 333 Wilshire Ave., Anaheim, G 92801 9 a ur r"M C. �Mr ornoy- n- ac ATTACH POWER OF ATTOIMEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED NITS. BE COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE 3�� S Dond No: 9398775 •`'i3 Premium: iml in pmlhmmim CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYAWA LABOR AND VATERIAlA9N 100 WHEREAS, the City Council of the C y f Rancho Cucamonga, Mats of California, and Patscheck /Nackbarth(f / (hereinafter designated as "principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated November 24 198 6 and identified as project DR 84-12 is r y ref o an ma a parrF4reof; and WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of two hundred fifteen thousand Dollars ($215,000), for materials furnished or labor thereor of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same to an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees. Including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the ,judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure co the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3382) of Part 4 of Divison 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suet brought upon this bond. Siould the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such charge, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on November 24 , 1986 Pdtschock /Hackbarth DEVELOPERS 77LMME COMPANY i ei� a j 333 WSlahire Ave.,urAen umf CA 92801 I{ gn David L. Emden arney -in- ac PLEASE ATTACH KUM OF ATTORNEY 70 ALL 110MnS SIOIATURES MUST E NOTARIZED MIST RE COLLETED IN TRIPLICATE t "'DEVELOPERSINSVRANCE COMPANY P.O. !ox 3343. An&MM OLUL 9M3 ZXPMTTON OATD Llw b.if, IM KNOW ALL MEN rrTMFS[PUS :Yf3:nunrvu.a SWOLV/RCOW► ,Aarwmeoa Cv0'.v�wf Nom!menrk Ya dOo S dtlYadawkgr ll r CMI« la Oo Cb a Arokm CKfar dmk ty ®lr. ner¢e.uf.pwxt Arvid C. Banter r ar W hdY Av«rNrf+Fn, w.o4 vw md.of rkly (« W M b %, YW r mmT. of W d lao0o «mYOraui Y r.rm m r.mAa fIS'�CA]o m oq Yr/o aWatuf b m.adar m 4 oWw ud m lwf Mr wrfmvm ft.". f ©' of u rk vs ur r Ymb lab 4" b rk Prmdm. rW wl W -wand dOO vFVrI.O u d* mmr by Its Lcmmf. MnfT r.*%, ur c.L a tY m d Avmsf(O:mFn MNmmpuma ib p+e dAruvf br W ma Odf dWmtmOrr) p laYp a kmmb. 0d'r lm ab4 pc lY W. m wp \aMNa M40ww's Im04 GdrW' boWL W b a. Mmn b koodk W Tbk I~ d. .YnmM pm w Ardrfr ry. Lalam 11 Ad ifd 9,b c(MYZLOrKU VOWRANU COMPWf Nopd MW&k"4q d floor► HA W rw Y bFlww W oba Abb1Y. AIMWda1AWr4dtat�lAWwfw !LtiArocmfii ma/.prru.mpfTlFncmu1144 Appanem LiaoTr okr dbe Fad.rk lyd.mrl o4 MlmrodY,' Lmrfr Trw«r)y),Im.a et�p�t col Fwrafml«b.rbYd «W murrrMrl +famdmm. h a/akrtilW r+Fmmirav♦r u9bFa.ul Mark W . d W mgmrla brims Mob. oobrlrinra rrrmaamA erMd «o7 «Yer��rilYrrim cork rya bmmY W kT dr Mm. ^r«m+.mYa««Sibu «yrrlmwkblFw rtmo�FFirr W.. '. J �iir tx Aq Mori, avml+L muOiv..�e �1 rw a vifmm.Ml+r 4 \r rw bwd rbr k wiC W I +fr w rk ti «- I10110L• Tkrrw mM mbo mFammY pdormFwrr brrmmri 1 it hatwY rr..frm..L 1 PwdYtagrVlwkrr«i k.Ylo«PkwlrCYbmY L Tlrl \wrnkarrk�lYw.blkrYYkwlrl,rrmm M Y'ITNM Y'ImIUP. OAO.OrM OMTLU6= C'OMAK Y lm«rlWdrWYrdOmh«,IM .. xAT[OFCALUMMA �•• '. COOMTOrtOr ANOQII KIM.. .W aw. Fa►f mroQ auT rmornr:r aYm ti rldrk k sil d w k Lmsrf, W k mForpr d u k MMAfICx COWANT r ldf ama4bAdwf ar kY mm YP�oC r k 3rw W d d r frC dCmrr dr e«lmuwmd bu LSpm/afWaArkla ofls.4 um�3j�aTd �+T' .u�. Tkmr x. Trs Jt.m CY� • 09MOPUSOBOFAMCLCONPANT.111f WArMICITImYIerrPifFm / du woaMwal.f rrlwFaaYp^MrriL MM*u llmrrmL 77 I RESOLUTION NO. 81-0/1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFOPNI4, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on November 24, 1986, by Patschsck /Hackbarth Development Company as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred t' Planning Comaission, Development Review No. 84 -12; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the May is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of y Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. i. w y RECOMMENDATION It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting said extension agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Background Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tract 12650 -1 were approved by the City Council on October 2, 1985, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $571,000.00 Labor tnd Material Bond: $285,500.00 The develooer, The Deer Creek Company, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the improvement Extension Agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. r' Respectfully submitted, �• R 0•i , Q Attachments D `J •s I � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �. 1977 DATE: January 21, 1987 1 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement for Tract 12650 -1 located on the East side of Haven Avenue, North of Hillside Road, submitted by The Deer Creek Company. y RECOMMENDATION It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting said extension agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Background Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tract 12650 -1 were approved by the City Council on October 2, 1985, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $571,000.00 Labor tnd Material Bond: $285,500.00 The develooer, The Deer Creek Company, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the improvement Extension Agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. r' Respectfully submitted, �• R 0•i , Q Attachments D `J •s I � CITY OF rruL. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TATLA TRACT 12650 -1 „• g o N = I.: . rt. i� CITYM RUM CIICA MA DIROMEPEN1 EnIMSION AGREUENT FOR Tract No. 12650 -1 YJM ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement 1s made and entered into, in conformance with the Prov',sions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between the said City, hereinafter refemd to as the City, and �� peer Creek Company referred to as the Develo per . YITIESSETM: THAT, pa WHEREAS said Uvelo.• entered into an lmprovemmit agreement with the City as a requisite to Issue ce of buildings permits, and WHOM. said Develipow desires aJ-1 extension of Lime to complete the terms of the said improre�. dgreement. NOW THEREFORE, it is. hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as fol lows: 1. The completion date of the terms of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period cf 12 months from the date of City Council approval of said agreament. 9 2. t Fa 61 of bhe i-j 4. All other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreamwmt shall remain the same. As evidence of understanding the Provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with sm. the Developer has submitted the below described improvement a security, and has affixed his signature hereto: 1r rT � 3/17/86 T. FAIT1FUL PEl1FORHANCE 80NO Description: 8571,000.00 Additional Princip�l Aimount: None Surety: Developer Insurance Co. Same as or g nal_ Address: P.O. Box 3343 Anaheim, CA 92803 MATERIAL AID LAIOR OW DescriptioD: $286,000.00 Additional Principal Amunt: Surety: Same Same as original None Address: Same CASH DEPOSIT NONIMITATION IOND Additional Cash Deposit: None -- Same MAINiENRom WARA = IOID Principal Mount: Included in To be posted prior to acceptance of the project by the City. above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMp11GA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation THE DEER CREEK COMPANY, A General 0y: By: GRIGSBY DEVELOPMENT, INC., Dennis L. Stout, Mayor - -1' enera L Partner Attest: Qua c a airin, very u a , y a Vice resident. STATEOFCNJPOF M I 0 I CCVNTYOF SAN DERNABDINO 6S I{ On 11,,h 30th y,.d DECEMBER 1986 p,µm�, h wdwwwz .a Nary PlticbWtr (� aaldStr.pwwaaaYappwad MCHAEL D. VAIRIN paradlWjbawnb nK orpatlbmaonh bW d bfa,ctryaMS91Pm bbahpwa9n Mb waordh Wit bwlwrf rh VICE fleekhm rd pwwrybw bmaarpdrPO bMWhbwdX§W&CM +r ON brhPwq ft*ardhW1h1W---a rh Swaaary a GRIGSBY nM7DPNEtrr TNT. ft dp,r,yw, ba aroubdh Wi,hwnwonbaaad YBB OPPa raPPr CnNpANY h PwP 00 nwsWpmrlwcrdh Ad ftw WaanwraPdbma wx pwV m,pwaav! word h amnr r u,d, Pwnw W aal WNESSMh warffidd" NTTIIESSIlylatb W da'J,rl Y'ONVOTARYSW.ONBTAW lipOFFICIAL am RUTH E. SHIELDS Hwi N • CA1nr,aa _MnMOrY OIPK[ nl Yp Caeeidn Epiiw Od9Mrno 19. IM 7• RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CONINCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12650 -1 J WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rm-cho Cucmwga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on December 30, 1986, by The Lrer Creek Company as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way. adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally 'located or the east side of Hiven Avenue, north of Hillside; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreemmnt and 'subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the developmeent of said Tract 12650 -1; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured end accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. ' h NW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreemeent and •aid Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Extension R3reemeent on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. y i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreements for Tract 12590.2 (Bridge) and Tract 12319 (Bridge) located in Terra Vista Planned Community, submitted by Lewis Homes of California. RELOM IWTION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject extension agreements and securities and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of two bridges over Deer Creek Chann_1 in conjunction with development of Tracts 12590 -2 and 12319 were approved by the City Council on October 2, 1985, in the following amounts. r y TRACT 12590 -2 TRACT 12319 Faithful Perforaance Bond: $25,500 $28,500 Labor and Material Bond: 5 12,500 $1 4,250 The developer, Lewis Homes of California, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreements. Copies of the Improvement Extension Agreements are available in the City Clerk's Office. }, Respect submitted, •;; RFM:LB: ' Attachments 4, kf WN f: • :, E ry Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lr INGnMMG DmHON a�V 11ML. 7TIJ& TRACT 12590 f I. f+ 9 1 t CITY OF RANCHO CUCt 14ONGA ZNGINCMING DIMON e 86 y yy . yy M, a4 t � ✓' V n N TRACT HAP 12319 ,, E7�BI1: ,..•:s, ,. -1 CITi' OF RANCHO CUCNIUMCA IMPROVEMENT UTERsION AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 12319 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE e' KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESFNTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between the said • City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Lrwis Hormes of California referred to as the Developer. WIT1iESSETII: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an Improvement agreement with the City as a requisite to issuance of buildings permits, and WHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the tern of the said improvement agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The completion date of the tern of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period of 12 months from the date of City Council approval of said agreement. 2. inere+se —t vemrnt seturtttes to reflect current , shall D• furntshe .1Dat:oveeent costs ap*roved v arm,,.,..,. �sf_ ay�aament and shall be 3' feFth- oa_tke —a ;_- pFiec3N3— amovets-- tlmereaf-- art_set 4. All All other terms and conditions of the sat remain the same, d improvement agreement shall As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to c"eply with same, the Developer has submitted the below described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: a 3/17/86 V .. ya'H` Ja:..:.iYt`•t }iu.:i FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Description: Bond No. 915226 Additional Principal Amount. Surety: Developers Insurance Company Address: 333 Wilshire Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 MATEIIIAL AND LAION BONG Description: Additional Principal Amount: Surety: Address: CASH DEPOSIT MOW"OffATION I= Additional Cash Deposit: WIMIANCE GUARANTEE IOND Principal Amount: To be posted prior to acceptance of the project by the City. fJ 'f1'ft►fffMffffMt►ffaaMfftfaff fMffffMffffefltffff CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation LEKIS ROPES OF tW. OP.NIA, a eneral par rstfio By t Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Authorized Ag nt Attest: very A. Authelet, City Clir STATE pG'r°"""cAA)IT�Ynyrl/Ind {r ee,rryYrrYrprwer erw 1 ON OnYrrr r rrMle w v�r Yr,rYa rK .r...ryr r r r awr erw w e,re wri r f,yA.er Yw � .www OFFICIAL SPAL PAe9A.FA J BOOZE • 40tt OUR < -C4woq I toy l ic60 ta'MR My R Was OCT A l^ v 88 4. •. (niYfwa Y,etlM,IrtrYrM IepF.xtAgmt ' CITY OF RANCHO CDCANDRU ". 11fN011ETElff EXTENSIOM AGREEMENT FOR e TRACT 12590 -2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agrevaant is Made and entered into, In conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a Municipal corporation, by and between the said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Lewis Hones of California referred to as the Daveloper. 11174 SSETH: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an improvement agreement with the a City as a requisite to issuance of buildings permits, and WHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of Lima to complete the terms of the said taprovament agraament. NNOf11�owTHEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as 1. The caMplotion date of the tarns of titit said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period of 12 months from the date of City Council { approval of said agreement. f ibrtlr�.ehee�, 4. All other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreement shall remain the same. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to cacply with soar, the Developer has submitted the below described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: 3/17/86 ;3", -.s5'P �a.,lr�i= 4'S^�h. �i's•+�. �,.- `ih ?: :':y. �; :, �,:,SS i�s4r�.Y6+�'14.• fV a 1 4' 1v FAITHFUL PERFCRMANCE BOND Description: Bond No. 915228 Additional Principal Amount: Surety: Develocers Insurance Company Address: 333 Wilshire Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 MATERIAL AND LAW BOND Description: Additional Principal Amount: Surety: Address: =1 GGGiIT ;CUPWATION GOOD Additional Cash Deposit: INIWTERANCE QIVLWrEE BOND Principal Amount: To bs posted prior to acceptance of the project by the City. ffflffHff/HIMtfHHHfHM'f1'f fffffff►fMHf►MfHfHfffffMHHf fHffHffH CITY OF kANCHO CUCAMONCA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation LEVIS HOMES OF C#tTNPJIIA, a/gene`ral partne sh By. Deis L. Stout, Mayor AMmr Se gent nn Attest: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk � ►.. S i N I i,/ rr.w.rrr,la�af ryY,111Y, YraM .waYY.Kaw� «Uf)�S arfryrlwYw/YawwfaL��i x�.��Jd �� �� fMw rillrrf,lYMfa„1 ,W //N aY PNMW" w rwra aY rr Yrw,fa ra — a�lViwapaYrwYYrfrrr/rr�f YtMr wrM.Yrwafy w.ra.Ynr,r.nrr OFFICIAL SEAL 19-- BALI' ARA J oocle Limccr. wuc . uav�aa.� � arena armrr ' 90 °' t j.. PER riAi''q _ _ - RESOLUTION 80. $7'oJ9 , J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPKVIN6 IMPROVEMENT EXTENSiON i AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SF.IJRITY FOR TRACTS 12590 -2 AND 12319 (BRIDGES) c, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on December 22, 1986, oy Lewis Homes of California as developer, for the construction of two bridges over Deer Creek Channel specifically described therein, and generally locateu in Terra Vista Planned Comeunity; and 4 WHIREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms therrof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tracts 12590 -2 end 12319; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California., that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the scan aim hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorizOi to sign said Improvement Extension Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto, t j.. PER �L I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �— STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 (JL"? Mn TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lein Agreement from Jon and Laurie Dietz for 7908 Sierra Vista (AN 207- 082 -30) RECOMMENDATION: It is recomwended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lein Agreement and causing the same to record. Background /Analysis The City does not require the installation of off -site improvements established as prerequisite to issuance of a building permit at 7908 Sierra Vista to be improved at this time. The developers, Jon and Laurie Dietz, are submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lein Agreement for the future construction of the iprovements on Sierra Vista. Respectf submitted, RIM: Attachments I 9a J, ■3 e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINKMI NG DIVISION 93 Z i N ME TrrI- 7908 SIERRA VISTA EXtuaI'A; ,� RECORDDIC REQUESTED BT: Md �y. WHIM RECORDED MAIL TO: < CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 REAL PROPERTY MOVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGRIEE ENT s � THIS AGREEMENT, rxde and entered into Lhis 26th day of December, 1986, by and between Jon and Laurie Dietz ( h2rein3fter referred to as •Developer"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONfJI, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as •City °), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a ge.eral condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for 7908 Sierra Vista development the City requires the construction of missing off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt concrete pavement, drive approach, street lights and street trees adjacent to the property to be de,teloped; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such Yimprovements until a later date, as determined by the City; and r WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct saia wl• improvements, at no expense to Me City, after demar.1 to do so by the City, , ., which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said f; improvements if the Developer falls or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. NOM, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt concrete pavement, drive approach, street lights and street, trees in accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the Installation. Said ioprovements shall be installed upon and along 7908 Sierra vista, not to exceed the centerline of said street or beyond the frontage of the subject property except as required to provide for adequate drainage and traffic transition per City Standards. 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of said improvements shall be at no expense to .he City. 3. In the event the Developer shall fail or refuse to complete the installation of said improvements in a tLmely manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said r improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the } h � a.. Developer. 2 91� - A l e A. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and i 1 t conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds a which may be expended by City in completing said improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described real property situated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit: Tract 2386. Lot 72 S. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes described above. 6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. 8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term •Developer• shall be •mortgagor• and the City shall be the 'mortgagee" as those terms are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and 'any other statute pertaining to mortgages on real property. r{ gyp. .., 3 y�;, ?Tg 9. If legal action is coma-iced to enforce any of the provisions of V, this Agreeeent, to recover any sum'which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created hereby, than the A prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable 4 attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. r !_y IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreeaent r 4� 7 ' on the day and year first above written. J Cm DEVELOPER t CITY OF RANCH) CUCAMONGA, CALIFOM IA, a municipal corporation By: y Dennis L. StouE �J Mayor s: ATTEST: APPROVED AS To FORM Beverly A. Authelet y Attorney City Clerk 41 q S y\ T 1 v M 1 N 1. 49 ".a. r: Yli w� fat4fMMHMftalMMft1lMfM1fNH k , STATE OF CALIFORNIA COl 3 ss R1TY OF SAN BER11NtDINO) On 19 before me the undersigned No ary c, persona y appear and BEVERLY A. AUTHELET personally known to me , to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMU(SA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to we that such municipal corporaticn executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUN zs TY OF SAN OERNAAOINO me, the Notary Signature On this the 26th day, of Dec�bmr before 9*491" si ftg. - ( 7) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowleged that th2v execu e . WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFS AC-ML ^ ocva KAL CROLYN SHA N K ry g a ure gyUc A 4 Xw lout � ws iz 2 NOTE: WHEN DOLUNAT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARINERSIIIP. THE ABOVE ACKNULEDUMT IS ROT ACCEPTABLE. A CBNNPORATION /PARTIIERSHIP ACOIdILEDBBeIT TSUMM.—MT E COLLETED IN TRIPLICATE. S i iY S 9 'v i �f� _ �. "+ : = {c yi♦ t�Y•'�.1:1a.N"L Y.`'f` y .w' a.. yv.'.''JY•�rA�: RESOLUTION h_. t?-6-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'RMCHO CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IWMEiMONT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JON AND LAURIE DIETZ. 7906 SIERRA VISTA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYO - AVD CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SANE WHEREAS, Installation of off -site improvements established as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit for 7900 Sierra -Vista (APH 207- 062 -30), has been met by entry into a Real Property improvement Contract and Lien Agreeeent by Jon and Laurie Dietz. NOW, THEREFCRE, K IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreaient, authorises the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sane, and directs the City Clark to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. California. �A� 99 - c Rw a rR .l �Y X h A A r3� i x i 3�t 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUC"ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lein Agreement and Parcel Map 10366 located on Ninth Street, east of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Sterling Kincaid RECOOMDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutlont approving Parcel Nap 10366 and the Real Property Improvement Contact and Lein Agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysts /Background Parcel Map 10366 was approved by the Planning Cr mission on December 10, 1986, for the division of 4.50 acres of land into 3 parcels in the General Industrial Development District located on Ninth Street, east of Hellman Avenue. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. The developer is submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lein Agreement for undergrmunding of overhead utilities on the North side of Ninth Street. RespectLu)Jy, submitted, Attachments -J f } •_ � u... C i1 ql 5 lJpfl I •� ICI /•WN�1Ms fi r111v AAMM d MfllL / +? "Al oilf /A itlC C � y kp .•vswe ... a b Nn raf --y T' MflN A T.T. E CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PARCEL MAP 10366 gc - ENGDMEUNG DIVISION EXHIBIT. t J!rt, - • i Sy •, ;?� : n +e'. • i r, j, - r•y_t'; tai i RESOLUTION NO. 97 -e'2j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 0"" GA CALIFORNIA, APPROVINR PARCEL MAP NMER 10366 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10366) a MHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap Number 10366 submitted by Sterling Kincaid and consisting of 3 parcels, located on Ninth Street, east of Hellman i Avenue was approved by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho wi Cucamonga; and { WHEREAS, Parcel Nap Nutw 10366 is the final nap of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Nap; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been ant. NOW, THFREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Nap Number 10366 be and the samh is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. sy;r .•�r�� Lf .s X�'�.,;•� .: f�. a,"Y' =.. �y� y: >: Y"_ `,: is �:` :}' _, _ .. - • `L:.." _ �� `°fir::, = -::�i RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY :•�i e IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEU AGREEMENT FROM STERLING { KINCAID FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL NAP 10366 AND AITHONIZING ` THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 10366 located on Ninth Streat,east of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Sterling Kincaid was approved by Planning Commission on December 10, 1986; and r WHEREAS, Undergrounding of overhead utilities established as prerequisite to recordation of Parcel Map 10366 has been met by entry..into a Real Property LTrovement Contract and Lien Agreement by Sterling Kincaid. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign 7 rae, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. i -• µyy, �y eMa"i:i`f.€a.�..�'.::?• ,.a'r _`."'9Tyii` kl! : +4 4' ::?!• :�4a _ - v;r ii?t�Y��''?i"`4 °J 3 4. 1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: ,�•rr: "t,,- -:: +" _. ,jai.- — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT m January 21, 1987 ' City Council and City Manager to Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Michael D. long, Senior Public Works Inspector Approval of Contract for the Archibald Avenue improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing, north of Eighth Street, to Bruce Paving Company for the amount of $19,551.00 to be funded from Systems Development RECDIBB31OAn0n: It is recommended that City Council authorize execution of the contract documents for the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Atrhtson, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad crossing, north of Eighth Street by the Mayor at City Clerk and authorize the AdAinistrative Services Director to expend $79,551.00 (512,319.DO plus 109 contingency) to be funded from Systems Development Background /Analysts On December 17, 1986, City Council awarded said protect to Bruce Pavif., Company. Staff has received oxecuted contract documents, reviewed then and found them !o be complete; herewith, submitted for approval and execution are the contract documents for ".hr 4provemmmt of Archibald Avenue at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ra..road crossing, north of Eighth Street. Respectfully submitted, M Attachments b i. a l w�Ptii !% en �`• „4,`°,. +.. - /Gen/ e , 'f'a�• 1 A Y CITY OF P -kNCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I SPECIAL NPROVISIONS NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS 'PROP'OSAL AND CONTRACT for the IMPROVEMENT of ARCklIBALD AVENUE at ATCHISON TOPEKA S STA FE RAILROAD CROSSING NORTH OF 8TH STREET BIDS OPEN: NOVEMBER 70,, 1986 Monts Pnseh r ' Roud*nt Engineer � ENGINEERING DIVISION t �•eF-. .r_ *= ,�.. � to6 _+?fi -�.Fa iii �I n+ A e SMUL FMISIOM WME TO CWT% 'MS FllO wx Iii OINTAACT GOOSEM Fa THE DS+WWW OF AAt USW AVM AT 71E ATOUM. TWW ASST SMTA FE MILAOAA Oman mm or m smw um CJIW Em r „d tl M` t• a d 4 •. i n STANDARD CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE INVITING ISIS ... ............................A -1 TRICTIONTO IIME RS .............................I AGeneral ................... .. ............1.1 Examination of Plans, Specifications, and Site of Work ........................... 9 -1 C Disqualification of Bidders and Proposas.... 1.1 0 Award and Execution of Contract ..............9 -2 Workers Componsatia" Execution of Contract Liquidated Damages E Signature of Contractor ......................8 -3 Corporation Partnership Joint ventnra —;' Individual FBid Bo nd ......... ............................8 -4 GAddendums ........ ............................1 -4 N Estimate of Quantities .......................1.4 1 List of Subcontract ors ....................... 1.4 J Competency of Bidders ........................8 -1 K Return of Prupotal and guarantee .............1.5 L City Iusiness License ........................9 -S P ROPOSAL............. ..............................0 thru E Schedule of Unit Cast and Lump Sum Amounts..i.. .0 -1 thru 3 Bidder Agrosien t .... ............................D -1 Bidder Information .. ............................[ -1 Subcontractors ...... ............................E -2 Certiftcatiee of Non- Discrimination .............E -3 Non - Collusion Affidavit .........................[ -4 BidBond ............ ............................E -S CONTRACT............. ..............................F d G Agreement ............ .......................... F -1 thru 9 Faithful Performance %an ......... .............G -1 1 2 Labor end Materials Bond ........................0.3 A 4 T� Yorkers Compensation Insurance Certificate ...... ............................0 -S c' +e i Table of Clitests (Continued) GENERALCMITIMS .... .............................CC Soctfon 1 SpeN fication and Deft"Ittons ......... CC 1 6 2 1.01 Geeeral ..02 Intent 1.03 Definitions Section 2 Scape and Ceetrel of the York........ GC 2 6 3 2.01 Contract Cocuagnts 2.02 Errors or Discrepancies 2.03 Defective and Unaethortted Mork 2.04 Dismissal of Unsatisfactory Employees 2.05 Termination of Unsatisfactory Subcontractors 2.06 Surveying Section 3 Changes in Work ......................GC 3 Section 4 Centres at isst""ls .................GC 3.3 4 4.01 General 4.02 Testin 4.03 plant inspection Sacttee 5 Utilities ............................GC 4 5.01 General 5.02 Location 5.03 Protection Section 6 Praeecution. Progress ani Accept.: -p� of York ......................:.....GC 4 thru 7 6.01 Gent ;l• 6.02 Construction Schedule 6.03 workday 6.04 Temporary Suspoyston of Vert 6.05 Termination for broach 6.06 Time of Completion and Liquidated Damages 6.07 final Clean -up 6.06 final Inspection 6.09 Notice of Completion 6.10 Maintenance and Guarantee 1Y '* QQ � P Table of Contents (cautioned) Section 7 Responsibilities of the contractor ....... .............................CC 7 thru 16 7.01 Complicate with Lars and Regulations 7.0g Msn- Discrieination 743 Payrolls of Contractors ani SubcrotracOrs 7.04 oaymeat'of Capleyaes 7.05 Was* UoderpaweNts Nod Adjustments 7.011 Permits and Licenses 7.07 Patents 7.04 Sanittry Provisions 7.05 Persenal Liability 7.10 Contractor's Responsibility far Sark 7.11 Notice and Service Thereof 7.12 Uarranty of Title 7.11 Provision: for Emergencies 1 14 Insurance 7.15 The Contractor's Represent2tive 7.16 Patlic Cenvenioace, and Safety Section O. giant .. ..................I.......00 is Section T. Y.383erao24t and Payment- ........... SC If A 17 9.01 4oneral 9.02 Partial and Final Psymant 9.03 Mork Performed Nithoet Otrect Payments 9.04 Ratehtion of Imperfect Fork SPECIAL C041ITIONS .... .............................SP Section 10 Special Provisions ........... ......oP 1 chru 6 10.01 scold k" ceatrol of Marc 10.02 Utilities 10.07 Railroad 10.04 Public Convenience and Safety 10.0E Clearing and Grubbing 10.06 lemevals 10.07 Cold Plans Reaevat lO.LC Adjust Water Velves to Gradr 10.0! Crashed Ageregate b,:se 10.10 Asphalt Cengreta Pavement 10.11 Cancrote Curbs, Ualks, Otttors, Aaups, Retainin��77 Curbs siul Delvowif Approaehes f 10.12 pattern Stamped C010:4d concrete 10.13 Pain: Traffic Stripes, Pzvoment Markings 4�a"rCover Adjustennt 10.14 of Manhole frame "ad Sets to Grade ■ APPENDIX STANDARD DRAWINGS Curb Only 8• C.F Rancho Cuca:onga .... 301 Curb f Gutter t' C.F. W/24' Gutter Rancho Cutamongo .... 303 Drive Approach A, Sidewalk Residential Ranch* Cucamonga... 305 Sidewalk i Ramp Rancho Cucamonga.... 330 Ste ndard Pavement Markin Ranch* Cucamonga.... 407 Manhole Frame t Cover Adlustehnt Rancho Cucamonga.... 512 Gate Valve C.C.W.D . .............4 Pavement Markers and Traffic CalTrans .......... A20 -A Lin IS Typical Details CalTrans .......... A20 -8 Typical tans Closure CalTrans......Fig. 1-5 Typical Clestn of Half Roadway CalTrans......Fig. S -e Typical Lane C�azure with Reversible Control CalTrans.....Fig. 5 -7 Flagging Preeedwres CalTrans ..... :Fig. 5 -12 Flagging E4wf►ment CalTrans ...... Fig. 5 -13 Control of Traffic ThroUo- York Zom s 5 -07 Construction Permit Rancho Cucamonga Temporary Stroot,Clesure Rancho Cucamonga I 1. C- Spti�-+ ADDCUDUN 10. 1 THE 1NPROVEFW OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILRNS CROSSING NORTH OF STMT STREET Pursuant to Section w., ADOWJM, of the 'Instruction to Bidders% the following additions, deletions and/or corrections shall be ode a part of the above protect plans, speciflcatiais and contrcct documents: 1. The bidder's attention is diroctod M the 'Notice Inviting Sail Rids or Proposals', first paragraph, Page A -1, and all references ode thereto, beginning with '...an or before the hour of 2:30 P.N. o'clock an the November 20, IM .... 0 Mich shall be corrected 'to read •....am or befen the door of 2:30 FX em the Zed day of Oeeem1 1916... 1. 2. The bidder's attention is directed to the 'Schedule of Un14 Cost and Leap Sin Aaouuts' of the Proposal, Page C -3, MTcT-snai: oe Waee m rncTuai ire foTlWW`1 bid item. ITEN ESTIMATED DESCRIPTIOU UNIT PRICE TOTAL ND OGAKTITr (UNIT -MICE IN WORDS) (FIGURES) (FIGURES) 1t•• L.S. A.T. A S.F. R.R. CO. Insurance Coverage Require- ment at a Lump'Sum Price of $ S 3. The bidder's attention 1s directed to 'Section 1D- SPECIAL PROVISIONS% Page SP-0, Mich shall be aoended to include the following: 10-15 A.T. L S.F. R.R. COMPANY INS UKE REQUIROENT The Contractor shall rat commence work under this contract until he has obtained all insurme required hereunder to a ca &W or coeponles acceptable to the Atchison, Topeka and Sahta Fe Railway Company to cover the following A.T. A S.F. R.R. Co. insurance requirements: (See attached A.T. 8 S.F. P.R. Co. foes) a) 51,000,000.00 Public Liability b) $1,000,000.00 Property 0mage c) $1.000,000.00 Railroad Protection Policy written in tv A.T. & S.F. R.R. Co.'s name. M t The lump sur .+ -iee bid for the A.T. i S.F. R.R. Caggy Insurance Requtreeatnt shall be : considered full coopensatlon for obtaining and maintaining said insurance coverages as specified by the A.T. i S.F. R.R. Co. &nd no additional conpensatton will be made therefor. The following corrected pages of the Contract Docue>!nt are enclosed herewith for the use and convenience of the bidder: Page A -1, C -3, SP-8 and the A.T. S.F. R.R. C er�lsl. r 10nowlidgesent ace p of mi r ,h i� x i F•+'4, �� r, l: ,h i� x ' ° ^ , ` � rWk ' 7K UNFAVOW W ANOUMU AVM ' ` ` ^ ^� ^� NOTICE UNITING SEALED /IDS OR PROPOSALS Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clark in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:30 p.m. o'clock on the November 20, 1986, sealed bids or proposals for Archibald Avenue Improvements at the A.T. R S.F. Railroad Crossing .forth of 6th Street in said City. Bids rill be opened and publicly read Immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addrousad to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, 'Bid for Construction of fschlbald Avenue Improvements at the A.T. f S.F. Railroad Crossing north of Sth Stmt". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the pprovisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rata of per diem wages for holiday end overtime work. In that regard, the of the Dopertment of Industrial Relations of the State of per diem wages.rn Copies of such prevailing rtes of W dill wages prevailing pp file In asthe office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Awn y alllf shall taus a copy of such determination, to be posted at the ,lob site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars (1125.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for ' each calendar day or portion thereat, if such laborer, workman, or macbanic 1s paid less than the general prevailing rate of-.waps herelobefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, b1 him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. in accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, an9 in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Coda concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.3, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcona•actor employing ommittee ninstptheisitelof the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship p am in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of a prenttces to Journeyman that will be used in the ,ferformance of the contract. TM redo of apprentices to journeyman 1n such cases shall not A -1 r '• be less thin one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, oP S. When the metier of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ration of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1130 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an Annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. Whin the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than ono apprentice to eight journeymama. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs If he employs registered apprentices or journeyman in any apprentic"ble trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shalt comply with the requf a" is of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprsntices. Informatlon relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requtr oft nts may be obtained from the of rector of Industrial Relations, ex- afffcfo the Administrator of Apprenticeship, Sam-Fraecisco, California, or from the Division of i Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 't Eight (6) hours of labor shall constitute A legal day's work for all workman employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California a_ amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor u.Ner him, upon any of the work hereinufore mentioned, far each calendar day during Mich said laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s required or pifmitted to labor more than eight (6) hours in violation of said Labor code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistanco payments ara ti defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Section Labor Code Section 1773.6. "r The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, Cashier's Check certified check, a, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rambo Cucamonga for sn,amount pual to at t least ten percent (IQS) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will r enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, A-2 11r s cashier's check, certif led check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1005) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (SOS) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any arterials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be dcne by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be dare under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucmw.gs for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor wham a proposal fora has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class 'A' Llcanse (General Engineerin Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000, et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the yrofiles, plans, and specifications Of the City of Rancho Cucamen9a on file in the office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Co�fes of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of R xhe Cucamonga and payawnt of $10.00, said $10.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $S.00 to cover the cost of riling charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordence with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as sat forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's rpwst and at the Contractors so {* Cost am,l expanse, substitute authorised securities in lieu of mates withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject ariy and all bids. By order of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this Sth day of November, 1956. PUBLISH GATES: November 11, and 17, 1956 , A -3 F �' � r ' r INSTAKTI06 TO BIDDERS A. MEMMM. Proposals under these SP"Iffcstfons shalt be submitted on the blank fora furnished herewith, Yhmr presented, they must be completely made out in i the Mnnar and fore indfcsW therein, showing the proposed prfgs clearly and legibly in both words and numerals, and must be vroperly signed by i the bidder, wrose address, telephone number and Calffornla Contractor's license number must also be shame. The City Council reserves the right to reject any bid if all of the above information is not furnished. _ Each proposal 50 Submitted shall be presented under sealed cover; and must be filed prior to the Liam, and at the Place •designated in the Notice Inviting Bids. All proposals submitted as heroin cben prescribed will be publlcty opened and read at the time and 1ndlcated place therefor in the Notice Inviting gds. S. DM Ile -1 Of MM. lgIFICATIONS. AID SITE OF WK Tie plans and speciffcattft to Mich the p eal fora refer are ee file and open to lnspectiom in the office of the City Engineer. " % Bidders ■cat satisfy themselves by personal examination of the location of the proposed wart and by such other means at they my, to w prefer as the actual conditions and re0freamate of the .ark, and shell not at any time after aWrission of the bid dispute, complain, or e assert that there was any wift-Merstending In regard to the nature or amemnt of work to be done. C. OII"M,IFIcMal W sum AN PM PKU "r@ than proposal for the am walk from any individual, firm O , ➢. ofperatiom, or UM-fation under the am or different mama w111 not be accepted; and raososebl* grounds for bOlfevfllf that any bidder is interested in mere than one propoeat for the work will be cause for rejecting all proposals in which :cash bidder 1s interested. ^; Proposals in which the prices are obviously unbalanced, and those which are incomplete or chow ayy alteration of form, or contain any additions or r conditional or alternate bids that are not called for or otherwise bi8dee r has � aftted il bw nJKtted. an which the signature at the �' � r astmVem, to Bidders (continued) o. AitMO AN EllEMOe OF CON111ACT Acceptance or Rejection: The right is reserved to reject any and all proposals or to accept the propesal ONOW best for the City. The City Council shall be and is Cityer"Y and Inuascertinngglwthat f� athee to �ttycy it will~takeecinto consideration the business fntWty financial resources, facilities for performing the wort and experience IR similar operations of the various bidders. Award of Contract: The award of the contract, if it be awarded, will be to the lowest award, responsible bidder. The if made, will be made as exradltiously. as possible after the opening of the proposals. In no use w1 Min award be Dada until All necessary investigations are ride into the resptusibility of the bidder to ohm it is proposed to award the contract. Bonds: The Contractor shall furnish A geed and sufficient surety bond issued by a surety compaAy authorised ptee rcdew business in the State of Califcrnfa in t.4 the faithful performance peerfor a ey tMSContrec)terr of all CA0ewiWNto,mstipwulations and apreem'onts contained in said contract; in aMitie,t, the Contractor sill furnish a Le aM Msterfals bed in a sW ppww1 to fifty percent (SOS) of the contract price, as repired by the provisions of Chapter III of Division Y of Title I of the Callforr.ia Cewrm wt Code. Workers Compensation: Colors ccrosnefnf any work wader the contract, the successful bf"r emst file with the said Engineer a certificate by on Insurance carrier authorised under the laws of the State to insure employers against liability for ea�psnsatfon umier the 'Worker's Compensation insurance and Safe Act', seat that such bidder has taken out for the term for which the contract es to run, compensation insurance covering his full liability fo compensation under said Act for any person injured while performing and or labor necessary to carry out the provisions of this contract, agreement to iwoediately notify said Mill edr if said r:'.fey should lapse or be cancelled. in tM event that such policy Shaine became Inoperdtive at any time before the coopletion of the wort, all work shall cease iasedlatsly until A new policy is obtained and any ties so lost shall not entitle Contractor to any extension of time. B -z ii P Instruction to Bidders (continued) Execution of Contract: The contract shall be signed by the sttcessful bidder and returned together with the other required documents, within fifteen (15) days after the bidder has received notice that the contract has been awarded, unless extended by said City Council in writing. No proposal shall bo'considered binding upon the city until the execution of tine contract. Failure to execute a contract and file accepttble documents as provided herein within fifteen (15) days from receipt of notice of award shall be Just cause for the Annulment of the award and forfeiture of the proposal guaranty, not As a penalty but as liquidated damages. Award may then be made to the next lowest responsible bidder or the work my be re- advertised or nay be eonstructad by day labor as the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may decide. Liquidated Damages: Attention is directed to the provisions of Section 6.06, Time and Completion and Liquidated Damages of the General Conditions. The contractor shall Pkr-LG the City of Rancho Cucamonga the sum of Two Hundred Fifty (5250.07) Dollars per day for each and every calendar day's delay in finishing the work in excess of the contract Lima prescribed in the Contract Proposal. Progress paymants made after the scheduled completion date shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages. E. Sri1A7M W c01f1RAC10R Corporation• The signature mast comtein the not of the corporation, mast be signed by the President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal Mgt be affixed, - Dther persons may sign for the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution of the corporate board of directors so authorizing them to do so, is v., file in the City Clerk's office. I" partnership: The nags of all persons comprising the partnership or co- partnership mast be stated. The bid must be signed by all partners comprisinngy the partnership unless proof in the fors of a certified copy of a artMate of partnership acknowledging the signer to be a general partner authorized to sign the contract on behalf of the partnership is presented to the city Clerk, in which Case the general partner ma;i.sign. 8-3 N 017 ii 119 Instruction to Bidders (continued) Joint Venture, Bid submitted as a joint venture must so state and be •signed by each joint venturer. Individual• Bids subaltted by a individual must be signed by the bidder, unless a general PYAr of attorney, not eon than 60 drys old, is on file in the City Clerk's office, in which case the attonKy in fact may sign for the individual. The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious business name. In addition, when a fictitious neays is used it must be so Indicated in the signature. F. 210 No Bid must be acccmpanled by cash, cashier's check, certified check, or surety bond in an Amount not less than (Io) percent of the total amount of bid. Cheeks and bond shall be made payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. G. ABOEMOM _ The correction of any discrepancies in or omission from the drawings, specifications or other contract datum nts or any interpretation thereof Miring the bidding period will be made only by written addendum. A copy of each such addVAN will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving A set of these docuunts, and shall be made a part of the contract. A signed COPY of the addendum shall be retuned to the City prior to bid bidnirejection Ap otheainterp� ion Failure do so of such t, will will not be considered bindlnm. X. ESMTD Qt2d) T= The quantities gives in the proposal and contract tone an approximate, being gluon as a basis for the comparison of bids Only, and the City does will eerrMppVA therewith, tbutireserves the that the Inc actual rea�tdecrase the ammi: of any class or portion of the work, or to omit any portion of the work, as may be dammed advisable or necessary by the Engineer. I. LIST OF SMCO MACTM rho Contractor she11 perform with his owe organisation aed with workmen under his immediate supervision, work of a vain not less the SOB of the total value of all work. ambraced in the contract. With the proposal the Contractor shall list (a) the name and address of each subcontractor who will perform work included in the contract, and (b) the portion of wrk which will be done by each subcontractor. 2 -{ R '1Y r% IL1 9 . %`� Instruction to Kidders (continued) J. COMPEfi11CY OF BIOOR The bidder shall be licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9, Division '1 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California to do tht type of work contemplated in the contract and shall be skilled and re larly engaged in the general class or type of work called for,under this contract. To assist in the determination of Competency, the Contractor shall complete the attached 'Bidder Information' form. , K. BETDMi IF PKOPOBM. AS GWRO E The cash, check or bond of a bidder to whom the contract has been awarded will be returned to hie after all of the acts, for the perfoemence of which said security is required, have been fully performed. The cash, checks or bonds of the remaining qualified bidders will be returned when the bidder to whom the contract has been awarded has properly executed and returned all of the required Contract Documents. Cash, checks or bid bonds of other bidders will be returned when their proposals are rejected or in any event at the expiration of forty -five (45) days from the date of opening bids. L. CITY WS WM LICENE Municipal Ordinances require the issuance of a City Business License as a condition precedent to being engaged as a Contractor within the City. s 11z - I,.,eca;s axe •. .: .. }'ji^ ,, e"pV� 1 Ot, er.� . ^C'_ s.5•e��i. t'R4} f _. ,•�? Sri{ t' e' s.: �d' S' 3r. s} rr}tirl�•s?1T`,'= "/%`.'i•1.`S.. aG'.e:.:.' :.1_ .. _,. *'l.'.az�3 #�'?T _'',Iir"_l i mma.-. P10POSAL SOMME OF UNIT COST AM LUMP Sill MKK1M MCNIIALD AVENUE. INFROYpENT AT A.T. 6 S.F. RAILROAD CR065INS 0/0 6111 STREET TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF RAWC.40 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA: The undersigned bidder declares that he has carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that he has examined the plans, special provisions and specifications, and read the accompanying instruction to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with the Plans, Special Provisions and Specifications, in the tier ano manner therein prescribed for the unit cost and lump sue amounts set forth in the schedule on the following Proposal. Item Estimated Description Unit Price Total No. Quantity (Unit Price in Words) (In Figures)(In Figures) 1 L. S. Clearing and Grubbing at a lump sum price of no n,rnr +.r - fs /S� L77G3L3� 2 4 Each Adjust Water Valve to Grade at <><y S , ao f Do, 00 per each 3 462 Tons AICWte Baia at TN f do : iv, 600 per " CFUCE PAVING CG. INC,_ , 313 W. Garden? 2Nd. Gerdene CA. 902:2 .• C_3 :iii q%.Ttr- M i� v IN R0p0SAL SCIEDULE OF WIT COST AM LUr SUM ANDIRRS ARCR1. tD AYEROE IW20VOEM AT A.T. i S.F. RAILROAD CROSSING N/0 #IN STREET 4 505 Tons As halt Concrete at _ �i 3'n/1 ��t5 f 5� d0 Sao ro 5 56 L.F. Construct P.C.C. Curb Only per Std No. 301 at h-i• r1A /iar+c n na&,PrS. f T, 00 S </•60 pTr near oc , 6 350 L.F. Construct O.C.C. Curb and Gutter per Std. No. 303 at- P /flCr4r ran/ /ors f Iloo S 3,; g5c7.00 per n�Tiear—` 7 132 S.F. Construct 8' P.C.C. Drive 305 (modified) a Std. Mo. rr6tj J= n /rl/rCr25 i , nrd .v� (rti�t S L/ T per square oc 8 1542 S.F. Construct P.C.C. Sidewalks and Whealchair Reaps per City Stds- app i'l1)n da //o roc CLna nn CArAfy 0 s nTV. e)D per square toot 9 160 L.F. Construct P.C.C. Retaining Curb per detail at ' --�-�-� i mod / _ f O S / 6$D.nA,, per near foot, UCE PAYING CO. INC, ' 313 W. Gardena blvd. ' - G.:rdena,•CA. 90248 - - (212 3+ . 6 ;4 •USC wr AA '�'t�,L.... • ,. ' .t2, !�:•. -• _ e?.- Lam' ^.e !_?'' *, PROPOSAL e J SME LE OF OBIT C05T AM LMP SM! AMD6fTi ARCStW AMEJwR DONW MIT AT A.T. A S.F. ROUND CMIN NA M STREET 10 104 S.F. Construct Patterned Steeped Colored Concrete Median Pavement per Plan Detail at 41 9 S a�.00 S per�� 11 L.S. Traffic Str:ptag, Signing and Pavement Markers at a Svi of 17 975 S.F. Cold Plan Removal of A.C. Pa unt at c �— 5�4 S A9 g;9:5. G}) "re -1461. per sqa 13 2 EA Adjust Sorer MaMole to Grade per City Standard No. 512 ri O(L,L_ ss �nnD.Gb w ec 14 L.S. A.T. 6 S.F. R.R. Co. Insurance Coverage Re- qulraent at a Lrp Sme of /d/ll N�lud ih/.rSrt TOTAL 3181 OF RIO S"ty O > ds4/Ic� :E61-"- haILWn7,1 Aft /%i V!>farFA� 65 -a 114 /7n O F./V S 7a. ' /Q, oo .t BRUCE PAVINOTM. S-. 313 W. Gerd" SKI& Gardens. ClOvemovis q, C -3 (213) 321.34!5 S•l1SCK 432674 e J PROPOSAL BIDDER AMOM The undersigned also agrees as follows: FIRST: Within 1S calendar days from the receipt of the Notice of Award of Contract, to execute the contract, and to furnish to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Two (2) satisfactory bonds in the amounts specified in the Notice Inviting Bids guaranteeing the faithful performance of the work and payment of bills. SECOND: To begin work within 10 calendar days afte, the data specified in the Notice to Proceed and to prosecute said work in such a manner as to complete it within Twenty (20) working days attar such specified date. Accompanying this proposal is cash, a cashier's check, or a certified check of a bidders bond for not less than ten percent of the total amount of the bid payable to the City which is to be forfeited, as liquidated damages, if, in the event the contractor does not execute the contract and furnish satisfactory bonds under the conditions and within the time specified to this Vroposal, otherwise said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond is to be returned to the undersigned. Within 15 calendar days after paward of the contract the City will return the bidders bond accempanyirnyt such held until not considered In =king tin the ecuted� other Theyy will rthen°be returned to the respective bidders whose proposals they accompany. BIDDER: 2[gZEr 40sms BRUCE PAVING CO. INC, SSVF..T" moms 313 W. Gardena BML suN OF ruoamu o:uan OF US AatBG OFF!r -AL SEAL IpRB'da DAVI5 •arum wma: • CA,X RMA can No= calm 1 M �•..wan mum a. is tw WWWO mm mom to w9i berme tam Y aw Y M as pas m am amamm me Ulm WOOK ■ b" M IM Ca"ofi s Wow M" W ml+ewmyd w awe mat wi Oewwlma mwMM IM wlri kmkoot Iwowt In Ib 44M w a rmddwa d as board It trmmn. WtWM my ant W AM and it signature U Vff' -m.., ...... .... .n ,.0 v, ww w,yw •Hw, w member of a partnership, a Power of Attorney mutt be on file with the City me prior ^.ton or City Counsel bid opening. otherwise the bid will be subject to ' Y, 0 -1 �F gas Is W to aN Shwa wwa a fmmyarp maL10 — ionic to r to he - tw WWWO mm mom to w9i berme tam Y aw Y M as pas m am amamm me Ulm WOOK ■ b" M IM Ca"ofi s Wow M" W ml+ewmyd w awe mat wi Oewwlma mwMM IM wlri kmkoot Iwowt In Ib 44M w a rmddwa d as board It trmmn. WtWM my ant W AM and it signature U Vff' -m.., ...... .... .n ,.0 v, ww w,yw •Hw, w member of a partnership, a Power of Attorney mutt be on file with the City me prior ^.ton or City Counsel bid opening. otherwise the bid will be subject to ' Y, 0 -1 �F gas PROPOSAL Person who inspected site of the proposed work for your f�� Nam: Data of Ins ' 1 6 Inspection: / S. NOTE: If requested by Ci , tM Dldder shall fumish a notarized financial statearnt, refereeees, and other lnforrtiai, sufficiently G comprehensive to persrlt a appraisal of his current financial condition.. x kp = E.1 9 BIDDER INFORMATION V The bidder shalt furnish the following infonation. Additional sheets may be attached if necessary. i BIRIGE PAVM3 CO. 1K IWE OF FIRM: 313 W. Gardena Blvd. 6" Type of Fin: Corporatlan (21 Partnership HSC# �U#hi 43267I-- c Business Address r 313 W. Gardena Bad. ;) Place of Business 1213) 321.3455 Place of Residence y Telephone: Contractor's license: State: Llcinse No.� Naas aM t1t as of all members of the fin: S "r Number of years as a contractor in construction work of this type- b —z Three projects of this type recently completed: Contract Amount Type of Project Date Completed Owner's Nave d Address. Person who inspected site of the proposed work for your f�� Nam: Data of Ins ' 1 6 Inspection: / S. NOTE: If requested by Ci , tM Dldder shall fumish a notarized financial statearnt, refereeees, and other lnforrtiai, sufficiently G comprehensive to persrlt a appraisal of his current financial condition.. x kp = E.1 9 F, CONTRACTOR'S Q0AI�IFICATI0N STATEMENT The City of Signal Hill The undersigned certifies that (ho) (big lira) has successfully and properly completed jobs of like mature, magnitude, comparable difficulty, and scope as specified in these Construction Drawings. Five (3) of the soot recent contracts completed by our firm are below, 1. 2. 3 YJ k:• ✓v Title 11MOV! Dated his _ day of J •' F -10 ••. r. K t' .g Y � 6 Y - ►RO►OSAL CERTIFICATION OF NON- OISCRININATION BY CONTRACTORS As suppliers of goods or services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the fire listed bolow certifies that it does not discriminate in its employment with regard to age /lmndicap, race, color, Nligion, sex or national origin, that it Is in compliance with all federal, state and local directives and executive orders regarding non- discridna'cion in employment; and that it agrees to demonstrate positively and ag3ressively the priinciple of equal opportunity in employment. We agree specifically: 1. To establish or observe employment policies which affirmatively promote opportunities for minority persons at all jab levels. 2. To communicate this policy to all persons concerned, including all company employees, o*Wde recruiting services, especially those serving minority cominities, and to the dnority communities at large. 3. To take affiroative steps U hire minority employees within the firm. BRUCE PAVING Co. INC, FIRM 111 W. rwd-°.. ati TITLE OF PER al�5i611�6 J� / /-- • G— nC92 L 7 Mt Please i 0e 4o my additional information available regarding equal opportunity employment programs now in affect within your firm. ;M E -3 ..L ion p ^p1•y���s PROPOSAL SUBCONTRACTORS In compliance with the provisions of the Government Code Section 4104, the undersigned bidder herewith sets forth the name and location of the place of business of each sub - contractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the general Contractor in or about the construction of the work or improvement in an amount in excess of one -half of one percent (1 /2f) of the general contractor's total bid, and the portion of the work which will be done by each sub- contractor as follows: Place of Business Description of Subcontractor's Rama (Address A Phone) Work Y»'p /-in laanks� 8592 h 14- E -2 X- Y, P 1 0 P 0 S A L NON- COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (This affidavit shall be executed by all bidders at the time of bid opening. Failure to complete the form Nay cunstitute the bidder being judged non responsive and having his bid rejected.) To the City of Rancho Cucamonga: The undersigned bidder is submitting a bid for performing the following wort by contract, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That the undersigned bidder has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in arty collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of from competitivebidding in Onnection with such contract. IK 313 W. Gardena Blvd. ARCHiBALD AVDIUE Gardena, CA. 90248 r (213) 321.3355 s -USCd 43267 STAR OF N UMM, ApLORIR,RAr-fw,. F a x,., AAb01 Fw as-r aw E -4 130 t �e ,ru zl. ` COUPM OF LOS AXW i L2 /,p ON _?1Az�iar. Mn* ll tai w4 a N Ir/ ie 4 ae0 W aN 9* 1 1; *WW MW to me to le loom p ei6 M kwm to me OFFICIAL SEAL to M ft Talw+ IORBJE DAMS ' & CayxMSa IYat aawaW re w&h YeerSat, Lana to r M IF 1Y Infr ate . 743M Roram rugs • eAVaaNA los ANGERS COUNTY OK" N w in irbeaeat a b" d TM f�aa� WaL aaa4 W aduewW 014 to me od Nd cr; i BRIC" tom wla�a�a irerral M� Y b bAw w a Sb e>� warn AUG 71. is , MWOM rI Rom bode(drrhn a1TIf3i aZlrl aFl oRrW awL ' .A�. •olAr n a.:zn. ApLORIR,RAr-fw,. F a x,., AAb01 Fw as-r aw E -4 130 t �e ,ru zl. KNOW ALL MEN Bf THESE PRESENTS: That the following agraexnt is made and entered Into, in triplicate, as of the date executed by tle City Clerk and the Nayor, by and between hereinafter referred to as the. " an y o Cucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY". WHEREAS. yJrsuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bids or Prorosals, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the data spacifiea in said notice; and VIEREAt, City did accept the bid of Contractor r and YIEIi! -AS, Cfty has authorized the City Clerk and "r to enter into a written contract with Contractor for furnishing labor, equipment, and material for the construction of Archibald Avenue Imgrnveeents at the A.T. 1 S.F. Railroad Crossing north of 8th Street. BOY, TIEREFORE. in consideration of the mutual covenants heroin contained, it is agreed: 1. GE1ERk. WE OF WMK: Contractor shall furnish all necessary Tabor, tocls, uTioT, appance%, and equipment for and do the work for the Archibald Avenue IVrovaments —at the A.T. A S.F. Crossing rorth of 8th Street. Said work to be performed in accordance with specifications and standards on file in the office of She City Engineer and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the instruction of the City Engineer. 2. iNCORPMTED DDCUEYTS TO BE CONSIDERED C(MLh3E11TARY: The aforesaid specific owns are ncorpora n n re RK-4 —D RTO and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if all of said documents were set forth in full heroin. Said docuisents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together with this written agreement, shall constitute the contract between the parties. This contract is Intended to rWrl a complete and finished piece of work area anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the lam and lawful governmental "lotions shall be performed by the Contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistarAy exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT• A. (10) working The undersigned date of Iagrees e of award of the the contra t orinuto" n notice by City after the 10 working days, and to complete his portion of the § work within Twenty (20) working days from the date specified in the N3tice to F V <^'�`.. n+"�•af <a,^iax*'+, .:r "a.. e. , .. v� ..�, e. _ . "'ti. s' Proceed.' The bidder agrees'furtrer to the assessment of liquidated damages to the amount of Two Hundred Fifty 15250.00) Dollars for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration M the completion date.' City - may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages. ., 4. 14UMMCE the Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until he - blamed all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence went on his subcontract "until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The Contractor shall taka out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance: _ a. Compensation Insurance: Before beginn4,,g work, the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a eertificAte of insurance as proof that he has taken out full compensatidn insurance for all ,4rzons or careying wtthe io ordance wort specified het rein. acu with the laws the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during UQ period covered by this contract. In eccordure with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his aployees. Contractor, prior to moveneing work, shall sign and file with the City a certification as follows: 's mm aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Lode which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake s.alf insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this • contract.' b. For all operation of the Contractor or my subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following Mmime• limits and coverage: (1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (2) PaDlic Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. (3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each arson; $1,000,000 each accident. (4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each ateid.nt; $500,000 aggregate. i F -2 • .'� "u ' r y .. .a (5) Automobile - Bodily Injury ;x70,000 each person; 51,000,000 each accident. (6) Automobile - property flange $250,000 each accident. e. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b, shall: (1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is qualified to do business in the State of Ca lfornia; (2) Ban as additional insured the City of Rancho Cucamenga, its elected officials, officers, agenu and employees, and my other parties specified in the bid documu to be so included; , (3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that ra insurancs held or owned by the designated additional insureds shall be call(A upon to cover a loss under said policy; (4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: 'It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be cancelled nor the meount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days—after receipt by City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter.' (5) Otherwise he in form satisfactory to City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsawt which: (1) enititiesaspecified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional inwreds in the policy of insurance provided for in 'paragraph b. by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of Contractor or any subenetrutor in performing the wort provided for herein; (�) shall not notice cthecreo altered without thirty to City by registere' nil. a. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the contract present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or present a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insureds and other provisions required herein. !33 ,5. PREVAILING PLATE: Notice is hereby gyiven that in accordance with the 1 svl 2 f-raI''i ar-Mia Labor Code, Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, 1' . required to pay not loss than the general vailirg rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character to the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less then the general prevailing rate of per'diam wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determimed such general prevailing rates of per dice wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per dim wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Rose Line, Suite C, Rancho Cwtamenga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shell forfeit, as penalty to City, twenty -five dollars (:25.00) for each laborer, werkw, Or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workmen, or mechanic 1s paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section 177. 5 or r code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. 1, Attention is directed to the Provisions In Section 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code cauerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenttceible occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apppprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate Of approval. The certificate well also fix the ratio o' apprentices tj journeymen that will be used in the Performance of the contract. The ratio of 3 apprentices to journeymen 1n such cases shall not be less than am to five a. when unemployment In the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an &virago of i5 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or b. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it 1s replacing at least 1/30 of its mem4ershlpp through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statedde or locally, or F-4 ' d. when the Contractor provides evidence that he employs a registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice tr eight iourmymen. The Contractor is rWred to wake contributions to funds established for the administration of appreetf:eshfp program if he employs registered appprentices or journeyaen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if otMr contractors on the public works site are "king such contributions. The Contractor &Q Subcontractor under him shall Comply with the re am is of Sections 1777.6 and 1777.6 in the "Joyaemt of apprentices. 7. LEGAL HMMS OF WORK: Eight (6) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's ro or a ro employed in the execution of this contract, and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him sMit comply with and be hhoourss Set forth in Division 2, kirt 7f Chapter , Article 3 to do of the with Code of the State of California as me do . The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to City. twenty -five dollars ($26.00) for each laborer, workmen, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upat any of the work herefnbefore rntioned, for each Mender day during which said laborer workman, or rchanlc !s r*"fred or permitted to labor mare thin eight (wi hours in violation of said Labor Code. S. TRAVEL AND S06SISTME PAY: Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay *W wo to execute the work r*Wfrad by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code section 1773.5. g. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and its elected offtc a s, o cers, ogee and employeee shall not be answerable or accountable in any nnner for any loss or der that or any Part or for rY other M g the cork eapleyed 1n W' of the materials or other things used or perferefng the work; or for fn,)ury or damge to any person or persons, either wori�en, employees of the Contractor or his subcontractors or whatsoevercarising out ofgortin ccoonnection with the ppeerfforruncfrom the worse The Contractor shall be responsible for any demge or injury to any person or Property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever, except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employees, servants, or independent contractors wM are directly responsible to City during tM Progress of the work or at any tin before its eaPletfon and final acceptance. F -5 1.3-10 n'e�+ The Contracto r rill tndaMfy City and fU elected officials, Officer , 4f1enac ion employees against and viii hold and saw that d Officials- from any and or11liabilitieslthit' Y be to arsons or ProPa , obligations, u1s be Asserted or clalued �� penalties. cor*ctfOon, political the work, Operati n. other pon0^• tout, entity, connactton with the wok, operation, or xtlorvltte t� arising out of or in a�U, aeplbrias, subcontractors, or lnrftaes vvrorided fern the haraContractor, his not then is concurrent Wstw or attire n+9ligence on the Part of City, fU elected officials, officers, '"RU and eePloyMs, but eaclWing such actions, or liabilities property, Penatiti", obiftNtions, or its ampleti s. serfroe y soli ny� i'�ene: or rtttrul adteondret or city. 1U emplayMS, servanU. Or t Penden responsible to City, and in eaaw.c :t,...�_kcontractors who are dfractiv a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed 1n coneactten with any of said claim. duh'.ges, penalties, ob1lflMions or tfAdiftios an! will pay all Poste and "W"s, {acludfng attorney's fees fncurrW in cawnactfon tharorlth. b. The Contractor will promptly aey 1udPeent radared a sfnst the Contractor of City. ar its elected officials, officers, a9"ts or SIVICY as, covering such ctites, dem es, panaltlas, obifgati*" and liabilities arising out of or in eonnaetfon with such work. operations, or activities of the Contractor hereunder. , and :ha Contractor• agraas to saw and hold the same hannlus tl�srefrwr c. In the event city, without fault, is aada a party to any action heor proceeding filed or Prosecuted 404 Mgt the Contractor far �. or other aetlWttn of oche ContraeW�r herNnwith axfh xM. wnContractmoms ags to pay to City any and all costs and ses incurred by City�in such actlor. or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys teas. Contract as shall bye cwnsfderedtoneaisaontracUr under and by virtue of the until disposition hss been trade of such a�ctiCity Maca� toned+ y City Aforesaid. �p 10. 110N- DISCRINI1MTIp1: No discrimination shall be rude in the ryrtg�of suthpopo�rn� � Public �, c ors because for public hooks rl, color, yythls Section 1s subject to all the penaitlas imposed for a violation of Dfrislon 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 1735 of said Code. 11. CO —ft—,T 1hiiCE AND PAT1Ef1T: City shall Pay to the Contractor for furnishing r r + a forth in accordance rlth Contractorr s odaUdwe,k a unit prices set � Proposal Norniber 20, 1986. F -6 ,. 13e It. ATTORNEYS FM: In the fvfnt that any action or proceeding is brought bye pa enforce a ef ny Um or provision of this Agreent, incurred Prevailing thereto. ever its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs IN VIINM UMMM, the parttos hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed with all the fmrlittes required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California Contractor's License No. r�, P Z/4 12,-11 /oats 'v BY: City GIOR- .� Contrgaencctoyr's Susiness_phene Zd C?r3� rreeached at any tl�erhtch can 9�/ 332 r - , F -7 137 �bE -,�. '..•'e.'- • N.i - �� •pr 'rte ' . BOND PREMIUM BASED ON C O N T R A C T F BOND N0: 1.696. 3 FINAL CONTRACT PRICE � PREMIUM: $1,696 r� y pA7TM1OME 1� EXECUTED IN QUADRUPLICATE ° RNp1 ALL 10 RT TM[SE pRfg>fts• THAT BRUCE PAVING CO. as principal, and AMWEST SURETY e. as surety, are hold and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in the Just and full noent of S SEYftfTY_lyO THOUSAND THR H NO/ 100 -^ D -------- - °-_. -fS )2.319.00---- ° --) Payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, exe.-utors, administrators. successors and assigns, Jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, Given under our hands and sealed with our seal th1s 3DB(_ day of DECEMBER Ifs, The eondi"On of the foregoing obiigatton is such that, MUM, the above -nnmd principal is about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal aV acs to construct Archibald Avenue Improvements At the A.T. d S.P. Railroad Crossing north of Sth Street in accordance with the AGREENEyT dated DECEMBER 17. 1986 which said contract is hereby referred to and Mtn a part hereof to the sore extent a: if the Sw were herein spaeifiully set forth; NMI TMOVORE, if the said principal shall well and truly do and perform all things agreed by the principal in said contract to be done and performed, then this obligation is to be void; otherwfae it will rm afn in full force and Affect; PRO'V'IDED, that for value received the undersigned stfPulate and agree that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract, or agreement, Or of arty feature or item or itw of performence required - /38 CONTRACT FAITNFNL PERFORMANCE gONO ' therein or thereunder shall in any Mnnor affect the obltgatfons a. ' undorsfpwd wder this bond; and that surety does x -. M►++o' wire settee o 1 ammamt, Ifmitattea of time for bringing ng mg aetlan on this bond by the chard*, .eatenttcn of Liar, alteration or addttton to said contr agreement and of any feature or tfmo of Performenco required the vthereunder. WITNESS our hands this 30TH day of DECEMBER . 1986. BRUCE PAVING CO. JJOf x v Title Tit] Z Ajl�—m p frt — Partners 1p t./Corporatton _ Other, explain 'SIYMTINES OF CONINAC1pR MT RE AOMMLMU KFORE A WIART pML1C. ATTACN IM"OpR1ATE AGt1004,11MO NT FOAMS (loplOf , pART{1 COA =Tim. M.) LAMEST SURETY COMPANY BYs — M. CATHARINE ROOF ATTORNEY -IN -FACT I x� }� A" wW UNtETM msuw+ce co. 43" WM efri N94 1863 (818) 7"1111 POWM OF ATTOIINET - fwoW Au Mtn er tN)ae H[stxn4 Tt1 .r.a)M.rn..wrra toww), A CJisgb)Awlraf..afox - ', l Clhfy 11ot1 • Yllbr W rb HH WIAf�MMYf aF IYI IN ! w YMrF b W tl MMII YH Oatl«� MtiY.. b Iw,M W Hbblt WYFiWM ttlRwfMw)f•MYe�d)Y Wedbw)bT). YAW bHNfw P«tlttl� ` rdw4wwrYlrr ,fiMMa✓eM6Ye�1~YFWrIYH YbYYtl MYdfMIrt HFN4e,d bw YHmabtl),atll w.avYYrl lOtl WWa dab Mr.ew NFtluM)r HfawlbR4ebYH11 Ade. R brat) Y N Ief... r Anwr awMrt /r W yy� ppryR HbeaYd•'MYAYbrldN)IYtlw F,rr, W«W FHhbe,Fr Hbb.YpbW,lab YYYYF MRY1Ct OO�ANI Y. «rYq Yw WI A Dctlae It IY1 a101)m FY H rrrtl.l e M r� Y wN.or ae H M WWYYYtlMYrKw.�YIYI�wftlwbeOYF.)MY tlTt«�jHw - FY�M1MMwI �Wb.bdtlaWtl WMM)WI bwtr.NFFe WYYHWYHOery.gbywS tlMbbMNY,YW Wab.MrewwMwG.MiY1 b1MeMbwbbbMtlr•Y YYHI w'vr1 lY.tl b FYI Ie✓p tlb+✓p brymgan)frptl tlll«ftl arbww f raYlvduba.a Irl �wNweMwe7fhl.YW rsrYW r.YOr. rY l.nd.gFMw ItrtYel+)FHYp]ew)b MMwwlMeYwvIe WYM tlw,r.•«YdWrYFy W Yrtl n) W b rtliaN F. M wawW esYfwry spat r ✓lMH bYYIV_lW W Y.blr. W wpOd4F W epwrbewMge FtlaMwY.YN Yp1eFrY/¢rF H Ow a.ady 4W FHtlnOey bwYrMbnd/w.en) • F1Y�tibM YWHTYwYMYNWKYIV WHrIYH!«RMHI woum ��Y�VHmfsew bY.a,wd/beaa .w, Ga�«1rM)nlrge� W«e.gbb.W Wab.tl)Yf.Mi �� IbdHYH I«tl WabO pM�1/ryy W blMpt+Yrwor.Afwm WflfnrMWCftMwYrlfu.YwOfbbwrY.Yb H`tl Fbrtlra4 ffW.Wb4p.y MebbMrtW aM <W fY d!r— AorY ,ten AMWUT SUAM OIWOA(CL COMNINY - Y •.•r Cfs..C� ��� .ly -J N+•s ow..F+w trAn n u+pana� cauYr a1 wt Afrwua - b 0.W f,f Wa `,tlI Aa.f�tewtllMMr)H��Ipetla n.,.° RYer0. cow, - w bNMi«rbbHHwaW W ✓b.rAWQf Nlftf))WAMlCl1 COLL 11YI.4VMrYMb.tlYCHrHFW✓Mlw HIYO HdaMM.aH ~YY�h YIHIHfMH WCr.twpHdryd!'..AwW1wHIN Yp'��� N.NFH W Yl'p.M b H W Fbq. OR N W WIrOYYM W Td4`YYYb wGafOlw/. Ml✓fb0 F HrwnaH dwrlwMe.aWtlq)rpd� • v . .er e.w b j•y a.aarwua..�mubnawumnu_Y CUMMAT[ ,rtancur —e�YH "b"°�'aH...urtam wprwct wrrrn..cw.d dn..nen oo «r. H, H ►e..w M M hPIM rmrfYC Iwea AfFw, de.H r,iead wNf a )bn �«atl W bd «. �MWH14W��pa .rHNYya h.tp.M4gYHMNp/✓ i Nbw) wifO. Fb�d�j����/J ��yl/ y )gvOWwyr�ldll�/Y {��frM.,Ad,A /beFp //J � �,IQQ Y" S 1_ r a CONTRACT BOND NO: 1099553 PREMIUM: INCLUDED ISSUED IN QUADRUPLICATE, LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND "4 K KNOW ALL IE11 BY TNM pKSENTS: THAT BRUCE PAYING CO. _ as principal, and AMWEST SURETY COlEANY 10 as surety, are hold and finely f• bound unto the City of Rancho Cucommga, a municipal corporation, in the just and full mount of '! THIETY SIX TH0USA1jD ON° A=gED pltTV utHp1w0 sn /inn 036.1s .50) wordf ) for the payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Give under our hinds and sealed with our seals this 30THday of DECEMBER. 19 86. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, NIERERS, the above -named principal is about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct Archibald Avenue Improveunts at the A.T. A S.F. Railroad Crossing north of eth Street in eccoreAnce with the AGREEMENT dated DECEMBER 17. 19_g__• as provided in said contract, which said contract is hereby referred to and wade a part hereof to the same extent a$ if the same were herein specifically set forth; NDN, TIE>fEE W, if the said principal or princip.l's subcontractors fail to pay for any materials, provisions, supplies or Wp..Mnt used in, upon, for or About the perforeance of said work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemploymant Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the surety will pay for the seine in an amount not exceed the sum hereinabove specified, and in ase suit is brought G -3 C 0 1 T A A C T hr:e0n LABOR ANO IIATERIALS 0000 • e reasonable attorney's fee to be uond shall be Vold and of no effect; fixed by the Court MWIOD. that . Otlarxfse this addition to ��t' lrer� ^t,extension of time. alteritfan� or said contract PerforMARCO r*Wlred therein met' reawro or lyytteme Of obifyation Of the rerMrsfOn.d metfe reunder shall In ber►by w1Ve notice of such menn.r affect the On this bond by the Cf fi t' i�tation bond; and the grog does Slid contract 0r agreement �• Chan" extension of time. t1aM for bringing action anti or +ro fsawn x t Iteration or addition to re"Ired herein or the This bond shall fnaar. to or items °f tx+rforsance Claims under Section 3101 the beWit of any and all of the Civil Code of Pers.ws entitled t0 file rOug give a right Of action w the State Of brouOht upon this bond, such Persons nr their bsf California, and nT" Or lands this 30TH assign, in any suit BRUCE PAYING CO. �r �CE�'� —� It 85 e y �lndlvf Al Corporation ` Partnership Other, explain AITACR A "TIE Ar�y�..I�RtS.T� I�E AC>Dp�D ETC. 1, 00*E OlOrF FWM IINfyIWOL, PA TMM3 f+I�IC, Rim �>SMIp. COWMATICM, AMHEST SURETY CCNpmy BY M. CATHARINE s-� ROOF ATTORNEY -IN -FACT /`A AMW[5T SURM tNKNIANCE CO. 4 - _ - _ P.O. iea {f00 _'' - WYd4YW }NL, CA 71565 18181 700.1111 .. i POWER OF ATTOFXlY KNOW ALL NEK ry TYM PF&A 17. T•rr N•le'Y MNIAw cbr•rr,A m•- •tob•w•nd re..a.w.a. a•rar. w beer r CWWLM 11•M q n. w hat •blr.•lrb••lt Nv Y ••,rr w r••e,K1 r w e. MY a r ew•q. Yrl, r •.rw w •.rw w •ns w w a r er,a+•r .br•r• � • w p rMla re•l. wrw•,h prwa,w a Y. rvw ee•p• , , lob h r lblr• wecl q Mps w b bq IIKlOi M[rylllMyrtf lOrlMl rne., w Y M r •r• N qp Y1rMVV•4 YKM p Wq - •nll•t• w •rNInYY W YYn•YTnlrgrwrbwge•Irwr rw.ar Wti rwbwn•Nrby. Iwl a r••eblq, rsa w w h Y bne w rhec • Mkfi6ree�ilr<11'V•. NIIKY{Yf gelRYUgIK•R'1 COVYb Tr MrlrN•nr•rh rrYe W rwr lrawrrrwrrweriprarpw •gr••t•wvrlllr r w ••rY N wbeYNYKYR YAYfITlrYI•bG QOY••b! r • wvvV r.1l,rr• w 011rbr 11 pJ• K /JC�tywlYbYYY V YabnaYpy Ym/�ngv�u,wgfbbbsrquaoKUeral M rwq •rgq•w•r v yrY rq lrNbrlb u gppe s r•t! Y w •nen,np carry r ter* Mr••lllbMlrwq•ralNr pr•r'Ipr:a•wewrwll4 rwNweegv.b•rtl• rbar•Ibl•wwMllpb�ab•M arYrN P.aNpvA Mna.M���� MOIViD 11KRIIIK /rY M wLL rprlalV rr�. rr,q v olbYr Y4r4• rJt M W w rrl•p qr ree•rw 0. NrrrrbAre,wrwvn.MNlOpp wr14M W rrgl •w r1•e,YgelYb b ' nlr. r curl rrwlrT s. ' A qb NrY YIwIe�Y.ra/MgveYpr,luwaar�vwMVI bNU/,wm.YYYW w wu• M. w r rlbr••rq •wry arrmY Yr•R•arl r •.bt r rMwrYM � ~wrY•a•eerq RYgrwr•P••'pM•bhrrrtgrA,r•Yw ni•ro•1 r•rw q NYYarr,bl boil rr. a^M'I b W,gr•Tr Yon Rl1gYm MIIUIwI r •yerr• N bn re,eple N•cr ww.YNr larglMrNrp b) pew•Y • ql Mw N Yr,s. r lwYlrM rno1. W,p9u0 en w•Mp\ w Ywvl N ul Ow,O. cam rrrnmYerrnrauvlbrr N•• riwarNA ,••nKwb,r,rwp . lw raawq•el0lril• ' rww wlr,q w lm q wrp,•..M N•aq MbIIKW Ma[Kml,YrpT rYfIP•NWMC•COMIKIM•tYrN ra•••prbb M.yb••/q Fe•l•M 4RwbtsYp gbur•lNe••WCw lr qN •Y1�� AYWM W 8[TY 8/WAAM COWANY •vna CAWQP cam ain •narus_Y rrp 10 q.N •erb n41�•wobryvrpelr•p• a•n0.Mrr» w tirin6 �� brhpw bbwhan, s.• n Waller . a14111IOT a1RlTl gfillly'[Lq• ••KI,GY1IOpr•Me •.sal•r.esp wler,rr.w Mbf qU rtiw,eylKrr•O•Y•Nw wea we.pbr •rI tern r •wPeel qYp w •l r w1 M � n w ebs•n M r evenlar •4•u6 w M r w uam p r eee+eweveM YruYar YYMSI wwb W o,pC• aawerlgwr••tl eaq, aM1Srf wngrya4q w •Wpba bw Yb •berr,rp r rYw•l a r Ynq N rnnre a YO WYeyn wY Y Oiv�ly YtCrYlr• Mw r•r1�Y1••w 6 •11t10001PIfI r rrelnr r.rgrl�.r.wnr n•ancurww•,wgnalm uylu�_p , CV"VXATI • w w.sb.la _ rrw•,. a r •rroT wKtlr.uuKrlq emb•rr. • fireir• mrerrvt 00 agtry aKro.bK r lrgw w ga1VU r.r N •rprnpmu.or ti lrq w •n b ru,,naq. w rren• .,r. car w rYbsb a r sµ•q a r Y.nal ca w KwrW r r •YO awrpn •r b,A Y w Krr N ulrner Knew llrgr I/ Y�7,•b�3®a•rNsL'C�1/ 'r`t •� •w.e'aY MTV. ;DR='S COWENSATI03 INSIMANCE CERTIFICATE rr The Contractor shall eaeeute'the follaiing fore as required by the California ` Labor Code, Sections I660 and,lgil: M? i am Gwen of the " "isions of Section 3100 of the Labor Code whicli requires every employer to be insured against liability for worker's cospeasatton or to '.omdertake self- insurance in accordance with the provistons of tkt code, and I will comply with such provisions before comataN" the pW*rm eee of the work of this contract. IRWEMING CO. .NO, 313 W. Gardena Owd. Gardena. CA. 90248 Date: 71 4,6 (213) 321.3455 Attest: / NY: e This is to Certify that r 0 NtMYranDe s.ao r iNt bLrlf L�11 �NIt1. MR�t1.ptM� I Bruce PAY, VieA . *d"4 Laty.ra ,.. q a 1L�IB-E LTY ou of L °' 90I48 IMub MUTjJA� r IV Ts'R OF QK:t GIRT. EO., C,4n '•Lw••p�+Lw« q�"rw. MVR�iRS' EOIrC'1'M:AMFR we, A" Utw S Of IL ABILITY CGMPENSt TION 4 -1 -87 uwa U* Wtowr,�uam� COY 8 bC2- 162 - 01347 }14 A°01r °+'ar AV ACOD(W "Worot. a ACCrsvl W f10011r &W itow u B m�wN oanl $500.000 K''R0.a 'q... RDOar 1'{MrRr pgFA eszv BODILY y ❑,s,"O�L��ow� NIURY 7 500,0 $ 1 VROPERTY Krses '5 O ua D'4MA E Igss.suncsK°M"At AGQWGAa s Aot 9) cmM LGI- 162 - 015473 -16 BODILY AND WVr ® Sr 3 . rROrEy�GE s Ua oA Aa Damara 500.000 AGGaGA V 4 -1 -87 = r Usbroll. �i'1 61-013473-17 s � offs L Ale to Exaar+ s L-104 LlsbslitP 4-1 -87 LSIr162- °ROC s Nat ACC. O1S47 }18 $2.000 aGCga�q,q '000 Llmlt $23.000 Ret@ztlon 1OCArc.ASi a o+ar cross.. JOBI ARCHIBALpnD AVD *oo ........._ _ AYINf1E tac.....,... _ NO ;AtAREp TO: YS Mona OE�ura UTA[R Tw�AppN T TIRMaUr 4 .1DD rj Ky �� r = MrMAigN OR R MION�N� BUN AC AND sY{ ��L8�'W1'Q1D, p1BpIC OP CITY OF BANCBO aencs CIS Box 807O CU�BCA , ��� IN In Bm 1 AND � DIM p, ,,roan~ AIIlSt OP BARCBO CUCANjR ,�O D0C01@R lb BB a0 - i INGIggdxH0 t CA 91730 L PBBSCRLB 12/29 '�^'araa• /86 3.rM q,nnyq � AMC. CA L a sr{ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f DATE: January 21, :987 T0: City Council and City Manager tsn FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Ins �. Pector SUBJECT: Release of BONIs and Notice of Completion BE OAT.. acceptaabuleesannareanid�itrissemrcc fofor nRdBthat city Council ina d an fapro utho s, authorize the City Engines to file a Notice of Coaplett!n and authorize the City clerk to release the Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $33.630.00. i Background /Analysis OR 83-10 located on the south •ast corner of 8th and Rochester DEVELOPER: Julius and Charlene Vfana 11881 8th Street Ra;„.-no Cucamonga CA 91730 Release: E` Certificate of Deposit (Street) f33,630,00 Respec fully submitted, 5 y� *M .CP -dlw tail. -; •� ,,, , v;fi 'i RECORDING REQUESTED 8Y: CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RM IICIi r-40 CUCAGA P. 0. Box 007 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF C0NPLETI011 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate to the is: hereinafter described real property, the nature Of which interest or estate OR MID 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner 1s: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHGfGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. o. sox 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, 3. On the 21st day of January, 1987, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: OR 83.10 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of fmprovement as a whole was: Julius and Charlene Viana 5. z' Rancho Cucamonga,rCounty oftSan referred to Bernardino, alifornfa, situated isndcserfbed as follows: c South east corner of 8th and Rochester _r r CITY Of RANCHO QCA40NGA,' M+� municipal eorpuration Ow 1 ntr; ,'a Y.•;� a usse gu re /c/7 City Enginaar °Fp fir? '"' ±i`S?.��.4 ti ti �jyA• 14.a..•IA�:�'.. _e:_,h...ii �. „ ' . � �i- ..i�ti, t L1 T" h Y RESOLUTION N0. $7 —Od? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO a G• CAtIFORYIA, ACCEPTING THE iUBLIC I FOR E 8R FOR AND AUTiIORIIING THE FILING OF COMPLETION FOR THE >fOR1C OTICE I F A NOTICE OF been NHEREAS caePleted to the satisfaction f the City Engineer! s for O7 83 -10 have the work c��' a Notice of Coeplettan is reVufred to complete. be filed, . certifying the City Ergineerr is AU�thorizc to isfa' that work 1s herep the County Recorder of Sm tkrnardino and file a Notfca of Cy accepted and County'. oepletton with •�4 JJ'JX r r S,r t j 1 >' CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 €I b}n lz M: City Council and City Manager �— " FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Guarantee Band RECMNDMBATICN The required one year maintcnance period has ended and the street improvements that C a ree from defects in materials and rorknanshio, it is C recommended ity Council release the Maintenance Guarantee fond in the auount of $2,400.00. Analysis /Background Tract 12305 - located on Hellman North of 19th Street DEVELOPER: Charles Roy Construction, Inc. 3401 -A. E. Chapw Orange, CA 92668 ') Release: +; Nafntenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $2,400,00 s Res p t 0.1y, ' RMM:CB:Jh � 9( ';.rut r srfr•r 1 -� /y/ ' A , w Y a a' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 10047 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recowended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $34,700.00 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $347,000.00. Background /Analysis Tract 10047 - located South side M Hillside, East of Archibald 0EV11DPER: The Pennhill Company 595 The City Drive Accept: Cran2e, CA 92658 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $34,700.00 Faithful Performance Bah (Street) $347,000.00 Respectfully submitted, RHM: Attachments RECORDING REQUESTED BY; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucanam9a, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY 0' RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tract 10047 2. The full nw and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 93MC Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 21 day of January 1987 there was completed on the hereinafter describcd real property the work of improveoant sat forth in the contract documents for: Tract 10047 4. The name of the original ccntractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: The Pannh111 Company S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucmmonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as ` follows: South side of Hillside, East of Archibald - 1.- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiONFA, ay•" municipal corporation, Owners °- Date -aa Passe H. ea u re tt City Engtnr ! *s ffi =i;�'a »� #'.�.4tcyA ,✓,� •' /S/ ' •1 seYrr.; C`r'i'+crri_�,'^yEt.:, ..?iai•.. "°'i n..f''„�1= i':` -'-,,. : y... , -, Z.Y MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and THE PENNHILL COMPANY. LTD (hereinafter designated as 'Print pa arc ,entere n an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete lerUin designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated December 5th , 19 86 , and Identified as project Tract 10047 ocate to oaa, ifornT is hereby re erre to an aide a part hereof; an WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. Section 16, guaranteeing all improvements free of all defects for a period of (1) one year after acceptance of by the City. NOW. THEREFORE, we the principal and firmly bound ant ucaanga as surety, are held and (hereinafter celled 'City), in the penal sum of ._. �.w��undred Dollars (f34 700 ) lawful money of the united States, for of wnicn sum well anb truly to be slide, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bonded principal. his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein specified, and in all respects according to their true Intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees. Incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreements ortto the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompa,tytng the same shall in anywise effect its obligations an this bond, and it does hereby waive nntice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN HITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the ' principal and surety above named on December Sth , 1986 DEVELOPER THE 'n TLL COMPANY LTD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST / Name By: P.O. Box 81063. San Diego, CA 92138 _ /d/dje CORDON C. HILL. ATTORNEY IN PACT _ . STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ` COUNTY OP CALIFORNIA ea. On December 5, 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Thomas E. Tucker, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis Of satisfactory evidence) to be the Vice President of The Penn - hill Company, Ltd., a California corporation, the corporation that executed the within instrument, known to NO to be the person ' who executed the within instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that ouch corporation oxecuted the withi instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. v 11 Stetrr 1h [ / OeFICIAL SEAL otary • o DAr MOLNN 00 • MOTArf Vu6tC. GlY0RN1A CWWA Ww"M eh ena NOW fM 3% 1W v. c• . y STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sao Botnerdino � COUNTY OF m Dn 0,4 5th dry of December In the yer 1986_. `fen me. LM -. w.daral�ne Motery d IL�.8111 tM iun et'CaliNrW. W"nWY ePeeaW Cot on , ••1•••,•1e••e•1•••e• PWW"Y ku b M (w Mown to M ee ale hwh of Mh/eaMy DFTICIAI, BrAi. S e1{iiw) to M tM Mnan "M OxOMW dw wltwn 101"sMet r AMney IRLES L BATTIN = ln'F"t Oe WWI et the CwrowaMr thwele nnW end eeoaeMeepe p me ry rAe the the Cw'xeeen eaeeuW it. s�W eAMYI+{i" KV40A ea CoLwrr - awn tmew W hand and en Metwy sea this 5th &y N December •ehw U" U, Ins A.D. 19 16_. " /2AJ LN L . ; n•un aarr ���� • .< 'INSURANCE COMPANY OF TtM �]J�� NOM[ OFFIOL SAN DIEGO. CAUFOA/pA WEST Caftrwd coq b under V bwa of IM ey 34 EofF PRESEN73 POWER OF gnpRNE1, conahtuta andaopolnta C "MIS and wont• Company of IS, wlhw Md lawful AUO� jgan.r.n. with �Y GORDON C pf In tn• ury out sin D1Mo Calif y, y� �m and t4sung v`no`a'leda• and de M' and et. +nd aothaN _ In it, 4011 Power the I.,nt I Oianted and h t4lw. �K��"W " "has wrlttwm abill U� PN� and $t ed. to •aKUt•. Of adoptadp lI anaN py, 1977. wN1Ht mju of Ih• Inhlran a, a0a1M by bcdMb halun tll • f. copy, L'-0 RaW luDOn has apt baUt •mwgpa •f If 'JN West Under by m allthanty of the fW •KIndW and of Mprn U• f�wlao and hdd M a, 9 It �ylof on `bACSO f ED, That IAe president ar Saw ,,ne 1. a tnu, th the C. a� MLYED, The Find Atta ,OY4aml4 President Of A ta^•yporwr to ucut• Ok t,, �µ.rK to raMMant. at any tlm.• 9lwn tup landbe It au commltW Sera ry.. ahLl ba 1 ban" Up" the CompaM ma ahl 0, Mme a/ 1N WITH tw CorVanyYIf�k@• and any SUCH bom ag ndw lbowfo /th!COeVany WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 a1/!aW by IM ftlldwlt and "slid lMl "a0did by w pYHd by l6"ltdh naa/ , Company of the W d Malted by the orbs ollkwa thh jTZy DAY or SEptplgnt 19� to w herawto afRap and tnee /'manb to INSURANCE COAIMW THE dPlNai WEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUMTYOFUMOIEGO SSa MalOw� On thh171N DAY OF SMIZMMR San 0-90. dWy to fly kno tfu pip and owll�,'n"�bW �'• a W lift Puck of U Caun a0k•Qkn nand hat hhf pNUNlra- and bW at by ," ,dap and Of he q Mt*d Ith• pncpCC C M a� OF THE WEST, ana tha Said Cw"tlw� wan office wva Wy�fbp No.at. sff.aihoi u la o/np, of and he b�aU�on to Ifni Na 1� [REOP. 1 Mra t.,gmto t•t my hand W wised my Official Seat. at U4 qb of S" ttM 1"d h• auf�ty no ch, h�T`SW Oplo. the day and year �`�y�6W7/W1C.Gl[OIW ���/ ha+aalw.a.f4hab TE O A ' P CALIF yNyl Wl'A l IIM NAfwk COUNTYOFSAN IA DIEGO I..$, 1. Iw Un Cal 3 ^. O NAw NRNIRY p/• �� S•oWpWSSavefluY o Md cW��M CM'. h N f t t euOt. do hw•by prUfy tact N• ;`ti, fIW Scf! dayof DdcdatpM "ftM86�� „ andaftaCLandhaanot been nvo4e(µf ER •p•. V. DIN na,7aa r tary, and aftk d the l�poraM Sbe of the CmPeal k'' �,, • ION F ? LEE I aINE Uj i 4, JI RESOLUTION NO. g 7 ° Da/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROYENfNTS FOR TRACTIOD47 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CONPLETION FOR THE WORT( WHEREAS. the Canstruction of public iaprov"Onts for Tract 10047 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAT, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE. be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Cooletion With the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. .i Y_ M ,i• yti�1t ^m14Y� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Ley DATE: January 21, 1987 8 TO: City Council and City Manager ism FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector Su9JECT: Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond C i• 4 � RECOMENVATIOM 1� The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, it is s reconmaended that City Council release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in w• the amount of $2,100.07. y Analysis /Background r Tract 9540 - Located Turquoise and Jennet DEVELOPER: The Over Creak Company P. 0. Bo 488 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 z Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $2,100.00 a r Respe ty, . r RHM:CB:dlw , u R t1.+ `2 n-�w 'A 1'b��iu ln•�: �„y 5�,,: M �F ii:��.1 °'r+'�. ±` <t�2��` t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4 1+ STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond BECONfd1DATI011 The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain fret from defects in materials and workmanship, it is recommended that City Council release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $8,225.00. Analysis /Background Tract 10762 - Located west side of Baker south of Foothill Boulevard DEVELOPER: Acacia Construction Incorporated 201 Laguna Road, Suite'100 Fullerton, CA 92635 Release: Maintenance Guar as Bond (Street) $8,225.00 Respe ly, RHM:CB:dlw , 'd. I A. 'S�h.,',�de_��- Sr';'"f' fi"�Y •?.�},q;fd:��^�'a t� ,ac."_. ,4; "`��'���H•,% I x J .S •_ l�. x , :t f.� r c i S i yr .pw.a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 €I Ail T0: City Council and City Manager mn FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beak, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Appr^val of a Partial Release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, submitted by BCE Development, Incorporated, for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 9955 RECOMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving a Partial Release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing Gho same to record. Background /Malysis On August 6, 1961, the City entered into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of the median island on Foothill Boulev This soreement was recorded on Septaeiber 10, 1931, as Document No. B1- 201600, in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California. BCE Development, Incorporated, the owner, has sold Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 9955 to the United States Postal Service. The Postal Service has requested the Lion be removed as a condition of the sale. BCE Development, Incorporated has paid an in -lieu fee of $7,359.65 for Parcel 1 of Parcel Hap 9955's share of the Improvements for the Foothill median island. The Partial Release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement releases only that portion of the Lien that pertains to Parcel 1 of Parcel Hap 9955. RespectfuA submitted, RHM: w Attachments yit�rv�•: �Ta[F�Ir<'�ii•�%x� �i.'.`it'.'t �- ,, f y:- —�_7at a r �� V N l ,� CITY OF rrEw: C RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARCEL RAP 9955 " i�.11a� h V sA s" ZNGINEERING DIVISION \ ,4r3�1 Y CIVIC CE1!i DRIVF; �•_— �" •-• p,�f a : {. `w�:.� %sCi i . m ji 1 �j:i;i w 5 iF .is.fl • � � • � � I i i P y NUl11Y IUAiII 't h ' It r �� V N l ,� CITY OF rrEw: • RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARCEL RAP 9955 " i�.11a� h V sA s" ZNGINEERING DIVISION Mum ",}. ,4r3�1 Y .0y�• -.:_ d 5;�/ter it l ;PRyZ4�,�th.�S i Pr r'o h.,. p u�hl �.. +. `Fx3 "i;t`.:. �". _.i .P: `i >• _ r _. ...a?i �.:-J •-• p,�f a : {. `w�:.� %sCi I RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND ) WHEN RECORDED RETURN TOs ) ) Daniel K. Winton, Esq. ) Paone, Genovese, Callahan ) McBolm i Winton ) P.O. Box 7760 ) Newport Beach, CA 92658 -7760 ) space ADOVe ror xecoraer�s PARTIAL RELEASE OP REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT This Partial Release is effective January _, 1987, is between SCE Development. Inc., as successor in interost by name only to Daon Corporation, a Delaware corporation ('Developer•) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califo .is, a municipal corporation (•City'), and is made on the basis of the following facts, A. On August 6, 1981, Developer and City entered into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, which was recorded on September 10, 1981, as Document No. 91- 2016u0 in the Official Records of San Bernardino, California (the 'Contract•), obligating Developer to construct certain improvements on Foothill Boulevard within the City at no expense to the City. H. Developer has entered into escrow to sell Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 9955 as per map recorded in Book __, Parcel Maps, Pages _ and _, Records of San Bernardino County ('Parcel 10) to the United States Postal Service (the 'Postal Service"). C. The Postal Service has requested that the Parcel 1 be released from the lion of the Contract, and the City is agreeable - 011387 1 sm3lcc N. LK �dO V .y ,X f ^C -I - s t' to this request since the Developer has - posted adequate bonds securing its pirforstaace urdir the Contract. NON, THEREENOR6, the parties agree: 1. Parcel 1 is released from the lien imposed by ehe Contract ao of the effective date of this Release. 2. Except for releasing Parcel 1 from the lien of the Contract, neither the real property, nor any portion of or interest in that real property (all as more fully described in the Contract), shall be deemed released from the lien imposed by the Contract. •DEVELOPER' BCE Development, Inc., a Delaware corporation B �. Jacc Iff Cor an, Vice President, Commercial /Industrial Bv: Name: t,O Title: The Cify`of Rancho Cucemon�r, a By: Name: Title: ast: 6 •Y 011387 2 i alminiefpal co ACA A, CALIFORNIA rporatton BT: ns , ou, aYor ATTEST: ever y u e City Clerk e APPROVED AS TO FOFM Y orney 011387 x /43 sm3lto _ 1+, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ` ef. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) •` On January 13, 1987 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Pc n an or said State, personally appeared Jack N. Carrigan, perconally known to as or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as the Vice President Commercial /Industrial, and N. Gordon MacRenzis , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of set: s actory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as Lire Senior Vice President Y, of the Corporation that executed the within nstrument an g acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. • N� ?�� n WITNESS my hand and oLtxcial seal. ��•��uw�� Y (�?�. 1U ILt�LI.tJ r �orC M+IOI S. MORRIS y Notary vuoLlc f me w Carol S. Nor-is (SEAL) .wa.•.�,� 'w o'4tt twf ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. i COUNTY OF ) On ' before me, the undersigned, a Notary P c n an or said State, personally appeared , personally known to me or provo me on the basis or satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as the , and , personally known to me or pr—o-v-eZ to me on the basis o sat s actory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as the of the Corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to as that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public (SEAL) 011387 3 sm3lcc /63 a i 4 RESOLUTION NO. Tf% ��{ �• ^ ` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO r CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF A PARTIAL RELEASE' OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROYENENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MP 9955 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucavonga adopted Resolution No. 81 -115 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Dion Corporation; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of Sin Bernardino County, California, on September 10, 1981, as Document No. 81- 201600; and WHEREAS, BC' Development, Incorporated, successor in interest by name only to Dion Corporation, a Delaware Corporation his partially completed the requirements of the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release Parcel 1 of Parcel Nep 9955 from said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clark shall cause said Partial Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the rounty Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. Y t A r y n' r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: January 21, 1987 61 105 i T0: City Council and City Manager On FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Accept improvements into the maintained street system, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion* for the Improvement of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks from Foothill Boulevard to Baseline Road RECOVIMTION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Improvement of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks into the maintained street system, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance in the amount of $199,717.50, release project retention and Labor and Materials Bond if no claims have been filed; and approve the final contract amount of $220,382.59 35 days after the recordation of the Notice of Completion. Background /Analysis The Improvement of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final construction cost of the project was $220 382.59. The amount, for construction, originally authorized was $199,71f.50. The additional cost was due to nine (9) minor change orders required to complete the project as intended. Some of the more significant changes were the replacement of unknown, unsuitable grade encountered during construction; the raising of a retaining wall adjacent to Central School to control erosion and the revision of the rock face pilasters that could not be constructed per plan. Tho additional cost is within the normal 10% contingency allowed. Respectfu ubmitted, t RNM: w , Attachments _ n RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETIOR NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TWAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Improvement of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, Account / 12 -4637 -8179 2. The full new and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 21st day of January, 1987, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Improvement of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road 4. The new of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Hubbs Equipment and Construction S. The real property referred to herein 1s situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: t Improvement of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line , Road i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a +' municipal corporation, Owner �? ','� + e age re City Engineer :t• ,c.. ;;." /L6 RESOLUTION N0. 47'ad(& A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO i' CUCANO*GA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE I PROYEMEHT' OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE SIDEWIXS FROM FOOTHILL BOULEYAPO TO BASELINE ROAD AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Improvements of ArLhibald Avenue Sidewalks from Foothill Boulevard to Baseline Road have L been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is requ4•ed to be filed, certifying y: the work complete. .> NOW, THEREFORE, be It resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and A the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. i 1, 0 ;p , .. /417 .[ f %.'r ey_ ri v Z" cl 'I,! 2 w Z e - _ - _ -W t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT "Po DATE: January 21, 1987 Of OOD t977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer. SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Association between Bank of America National T'ast 0 Savings Association as Trustee of the Vera Tolstoy Trust and Conservator of the Andrey Tolstoy Estate and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage at 9686 Hillside Road RECOMMENDATION. It Is recommended City ic eteadee approving Agreement for InstallionofPubll Improvemnnpdlcatioewen the Bank of America National Trust b Savings Association as Trustee of the Vera Tolstoy Trust end Conservator of the Andrey Tolstoy Estate and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACRgoU D A% YSIS, The attached Agreexnt between the City and the Bank of Aearlca National Trust tL Savings Association provides for ystreet improvements which include curbs, hetVera Tolstoybst tee fronttngtyilisldi Road. drTTNnBa street Ica Nationsi Trust i Savings Association as Trustee for the Vera Tolstoy Estate and Conservator of the Andrey Tolstoy Estate has agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of Hillside Road in return for the construction of improvements. The street Capital Improvement Projectlifor the Reconstruction conjunction nd Widening OfhHillside Road from Archibald Avenue to Malachite Avenue. Re sp submitted, %PI:C 1:k� o Attachments I >3 J h L AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION Cr- PUBLIC IMPROVEMW AND DEDICATION This !.F event it made and entered into this .��_ day of %� 0 " 198X by and between it,* City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation l (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and The Bank of America as Trustee of the Vera Tolstoy Trust and the Bank of America as Conservator of the Andrey Tolstoy Estate (hereinafter referred to as ' OWNER`) for the installation of k' certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, s p drive approaches, street lights, store drain and street pavements along a portion of Hillside Road In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (1) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently contemplates the installation of public improvements along Hillside Road from Archibald Avenue to Malachite Avenue (the 'Hillside Road Project' hereinafter in this Agreement). (• (ii) OWNER owns that certain real property identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 1061 - 561 -03, fronting along Hillside Road, which property is within ite limits of the Hillside Road Project, and is described j' as follows in the First and Final Account and Report recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California on December 13, 1983, Oncument No. 83- 292995: From Hillside Road on the South, to fifteen (15) feet beyond t the Eucalyptus tree vind -break to the Worth. From Archibald ti Avenue on the East, to an area approximately one hundred and ii, twenty -fire (125) feet to the West of the westarly -most part ;w of the family home, more or less. In addition, all existing ' IF access roads, driveways, and/or paths to the home shall be a part of said parcel. -I- /C 9 77i. r (if 1) OWO dedicate nke right.... Participate in the Hillside Its pro wU' related to street rata Road Protect as as to wrb at 9696 Hillside Road ("the iolsto Is w111i 9e f9Pror n9 to include the 7olst0 Y Portf � Frei aiante along Y POrtf on naftarl. CITY upon tanee and conditions he on within the Hillside Road ihlE► Mfnafyr sat forth, protect !. EFORE. ft fs reed 0 �R0 y d two" CITY and Okla as follow WWI? execute tachedrperetond related P<rwses in f oasaneet in favor of CITY fos: u Eshfbtt •A•. and Content street 2. ldentteal to that CITY fs a9tW�rf _ led t0 pose ' fortpwith upon eseeutfon Of this Agreeeynt, s gNd of Fasten! !TY shall foci recorded 01 the Hfilsf �a the TOistOY PortfM as 4 Road Prt;,{ect and shall cause installed a Part of life eonstructioe at CITY'S role a sueh Public tapror�ts to be swciffcatigns xPense, in �refor. tceordence agents 4. �R agrees grant �� CITY'S Plans and to ConstructfanlaaMa�anq COnuactors�Such rights of ofricfals. officers. Cause the c of as are ltd necessary by antry and/cr t ry S, lotion t tiN Tolstoy Portion, Y CITY s Cib' FnSinear to Shall De the 6awa of the State Of California. by and construed 1rt In the event accordance with or provision of legal PrOcaedfng 1s instituted Shall this Agreeeent. the pravaflfn be entitled to enforce any term vet r attorneys, fees and said legal Pro"aedfng an +eOOnt deter*fned b cos Court to be reasonable. roe° other party in >r .2- "� ! %d 8 7. This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties hereon end to their respective hairs, executors, adeinistrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or arleits. 8. This Agreaent supersedes any and all other agrane"ts, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subJec2 utter hereof. Each pare' to this Agreement acknowledges that ra representation by +RV ParU' which is not embodied herein nor any other agremar:t, statement or proedse not contained to this Agreement shall y modification of this lyraaent shell y be effective only 1t is in rrltin be vrlid or bindings. An signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agraaent on the day and year first above wr'T:•.a. CITY CITY of RANLlq NC,t cucAMio PROPERTY OR OVER CALIFORNIA a pa corporation awniel 1 MW W AMERICA AS TRUSTEE OF THE VERA TM.S7 y TRUST By: Z LM OF AMERICA AS C0kMVAT0It OF THE ANDfry TOLSTOY ESTATE ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FOAR: every . u e e , e rney _3. /%/ 9686 111111tda Arad. Rambo Cucu"a nK'ONana neanot{• R G9s of Rancho cuwomp ■IWIp°°aKe TO Chy of Rancho cunmmea P.O. an 107 Rancho CKMOD .CA 91710 ma mansaaslT L3"iMn000mn OK — GPAW DM FOR YAWADU COINU)nAT10k renipt of w" b he eh7111Aaeela4a4 Bank of aMH T t of th r T l Tg T t and ` Bank of Aarlea u r • of U. Audrey T I U r ORAlflp) b tb city it X-Oho c"a —we. a Meadow Corporation. that eaPbb feel Wnto 1, to ear City of R-01119 CM—OMM County of Men RrtreYs, Stab or CoditaNl., Daebed m ftn m, That portion of the Morthunst Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Frectionel Section 220 Tmsblp I North, Range 7 West. San Bernardino Meridian, according to Goverment Surrey described as follows- All that portion of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22 lying southerly of a It" 33.00 feet northerly$ matured at right angles, Iron the folloming dacrlbed Ilms Begirnt[y at a point o the easterly IIm of Tract No. 9569 As shorn on plot recorded In Book 119 of Maps. Pages a through 10, records of said County, t distant South 012S•S01 tbst, 7.00 feet Iron the Morhteast corner of raid Tract No. 9$691 Thence South 89.39'001 East a distance of 671.91 fast to a 1 tech Iran pipe, tagpa RE 7344, slid point being the south sixteenth corner of said Section 22 and the centerline Interaction of Hillside Road and Arrhlbaid Anoue is sham on said '1 Map of Tract 9569. �)] EXCEPT THEREFROM any portion lying Within dedicated public reds. ' SEE EXHIBIT A amt of 1"711. Matbnel Treat a golea. feelaeteo a tor,gtt�"k•.. (•�t[. rr.ateaat Tnii °feG•➢Clet Dial , taaMMruL ACKNOWLROOYNNT - InaY Glaraaaa. er. h.prtr apt. Office, STATE Of CALIMMIA •. • tun. "gala i CUM OF ATUUM is IN w t" Ibs 7T;atr And Aim— Brea -Td. Is )rams rraidtaferil..d Wn/arat .. Matery ►NStr l�lap/a M flares, doll I�ildn tanl irK ct.aau as c tB)amN ated the e t ... rata ( '• w+ Wr , mw aeNl eh* a _ lasted eaKUta/ the fare/slag lost Bat , ! b gun lM IclmWlNdN to ! that attch Iuectatl�irecuW the IttantatlM therale Mae. a"d "a. , hITNESS b Bon and /ffldd anal. ' ti: t (` r f :'•:e1 Nola 11ibar t t' S vA%I. County aNd Stab afernald. 6 r 1• 4 /'73 4*41op.r .11r tv ► hl •��I w L] 014W A Aw Q, 10 w �.' Af 77 ///Xik W. .- 1 SS \ � �i :' � u ,•r �l � o • C" lVi\� \'i,\O� � �� • iggt �` `y, 'may' «^]•:Y�� M T e'r • �� J-•Li �M .ai•Yri Jam, A�rrirry.Otiia>res a• /'73 i _ p I r•r•,.c. �i� p M S Ate` Asu E M Zfi r �H �....♦ , M n1,..t /tlC yf.0.1.tr 0 z-PrvP", ee.bvent s� � l� ■.. uy.,p p 9 o OA 7r� ..?j ■ AYGY /8910 'fg M � ■ Y � � ■ � i RO��►�+f+' Ltedr'es� n y�i. J,t«�r.F,� � • 17V _�• S RESOLUTION NO. 87�Da7 M A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CtUMAGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR 1 INSTALLATION OF PUNIC INPROVEIENT AND DEDICATION FROM THE WK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST 6 SAYINGS ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE OF TiE VERA TOLSTOY TRUST AND CONSERVATOR OF THE ANDREY TOLSTOY ESTATE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEPX TO SIGN SAME fi? WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish conjunction nigh the Improvement ofconstruction lside Road Project; andproranents in a aYIEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drivs approaches. •treat lights, storm drain and street pavements at 9666 Hillside Road to be mode part of the Improvement of Hillside Road Project; and WHEREAS, the lank of America National Trust A Savings Association as I. hsstodic Vera tf Conservator f the � o r Estate has dedicate right-of-way to the Citsai s improvements. I, NON, THEREFORE, lE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, a authorizes the Mayor and the City Clark to sign same, and directs the City Clark to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 1?:r S k :y Y �s 4 I ti :i f� r' M STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council ani City Clerk FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer -ti. r l.�i im SUBJECT: Approve. of Amendment to Lien Agreement dated May 8, 1986, by and between the City of Bai:ho Cucamonga and Paul F. McMichael and Cheryl A. McMichael to increase the construction cost by an amount not to exceed $4140.00 for the purpose of constructing a variable height retaining call. RECOMMENATIOr: it is recomemded that City Couch adopt the attached Resolution approving the Amendment to Lien Av "ment entered into the 8th day of May, 1986, by and between Paul F. and Cheryl A. McMichael and the City of RancW Cucamonga to increase the amount of construction costs by an amount not to exceed $4140.00 for the purpose of a brick vemer retaining wall. BACRROB70 /Ai�YSIS• The attached Amendment to Lien Agreement betwmen the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Paul F. and Cheryl A. Mdlichael provides for the amount of construction costs to be increased by $4140.00 for the purpose of constructing a 86 linear foot variable height, brick vamer retaining wall across the front of McMichaeI's property located at 9142 Loon Avenue. Said improvement will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the Reconstruction of Loon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. RespectfulU submitted, � t R Attachments /7t- su .r January 7, 1907 To the City of Rancho Cucamonga Job bid for Paul "Ickael, Lemon Street, Alta Lose: 92 linear foot retaining wall, maximm Might 2 feet out of 6 x a x 16 block, north side to be color - coated to match house and south side to be veneered, '> with used brick. Also, chow and remove existing brick columns and replace maximum 4 foot high x 20 inches. Also, veneer mailbox ail with a total price of $4140.00 Vallance A Luna Masonry Construction Lic. /499659 8,r /%% •.i .'4 , / -1 -S7 T77 -& C. ,/ 0- & OL LIZ .N. VALLANCE MASONRY CONSTRUCTION -1 war& r n+nMO�avn /7P �'f »es9 AMEiVW TO LIEN AGREEMENT The Lien Agreement made and entered into this 8th k of MAY, 19", by and betraen the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Paul F. McMicMel and Cheryl A. "fcMel is hereby amended this Incrust the cost of construction b of —'—' 1986 to Purpose of addi ,, y an mm�t rwt to ezcaed S1110.00, for the ny a re able Might, brick veneer retaining wall along the front of the Mdi:chsel property. loatcd at 9742 Lean Avenue to the :1ty of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY City orni,�a°unifamci� corporation BY: Senn s ou . ayor Approved as to form: lf"ever y u e e C�-- ._rvY -- r, . f'r i -°_°ci.:.`.f :'r aS1il'ti ;•v.` r 5'_y?p� 4 RESOLUTION NO. g'7 A, RESOLUTION OF THE- CITY CMNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ' CUCAlWW. ACCEPTING AN AMENDMENT TO LIEN AGREEMENT DATED MAT a. 1906, BY AND 9ETIE6N PAUL F. AND CHERYL A. MC Ml0KL AND THE CITY OF PNCHO COCJMDMGA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MIRK 70 SIGN SAME , 8 M NIEAEA:, the idsUllation of a variable Might retaining w11 rith` brick vaneer located at 9742 Leon Avenue, to be Made Part of the Limon Avenw Reconstruction Project;, and I WHEREAS, Paul and Cheryl ,MtMlchae7 have submitted an Am Want to their Lien AS mm t is raisburiwent to the City for said improvements. NOM, THEREFORE 9£ IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of amon Rancho Cucga, Cali {ornia, does accept said Amendment to Lien Agreement authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sr--, and directs the City Clark to record sane in the office of the County Be. der of San geraardino County, California. ,z Apo a A I B1 3' :r I •E I . — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r STAFF REPORT, 2�Y DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council and Cfty Manager tmn FROM: Russell 11. Maguire, City Engineer By: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Yorks Inspector SUBJECT: Award the Contract for Construction of Traffic Signals at Three locations, more cPeeiffeally the intersections -of Mirth Street and Archibald Avenue; Amethyst Street and Baseline Road, and Alta West& and Baseline Road to the lowest responsible bidder Paxin Electric of Lancaster, California in the amount of 5142,58640 to be funded from Systems Development RECOV19 11TI011: It is recomrended that City :ouncii award the Construction of Traffic Signals at Three locations to the lowest responsible bidder, Paxin Electric for the lowest bid of $142,586.00 to be funded from System Development. Background/Analysis On December 3, 1987, City Council approved plans and specifications for said project and authorized staff to seek bids. Bids were opened on January 8, 1987 and found to be acceptable. (Ste attached bid summary) Respectful ubmittad, FM• w Attachment 0 a ,1 m! a a a e a a m � K � ) 2 � « ■ ■ f ; ! §; m e e e ! e « e a e k K ! . ■ . ■ � � @ �■ . , ` m s■ e a e a m■ k � � ■ ■ § ) ) [ $ k § |■ $ T 2 2 | | 2 7 k !2 \ a m e e a e e ■� ■ @ § ■ ■ « ■ a !| § ■ £ 3 f 'K ` §■ s e@ e s e a a s � 7 e ■ ■ ■ ■ f ■ § 2 � )■ 2■ - 2 ] . ) J J f J � ■ � � � ! ! q k } } 'Pa _!�® 2� b i �,e % !�!!�lS��� r R i ■ -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 T0: City Council end City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUSJECT: Sale of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue Property (APR 229- 261 -64) by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to Terraden Corporation of Redondo Beach, California for an .count of $78,000.00 Ro recommendation or action pursuant to this report. Escrow on the above- awntiawd property closed Friday, January 9, 1986. A check in the mount of $77,106.00 was received and delivered to Finance Director to be deposited into Assessment District 82 -1 account. The property, located on 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga was sold to Terraden Corporation for an mount of $78,000.00. Fees incurred by the City from the sale of the property include a title insurance policy for $512.00 and an escrow fee of $3D0.00. A final escrow accounting report is attached. Respee ul submitted, EH�� Attachments /d3 t T0: City Council end City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUSJECT: Sale of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue Property (APR 229- 261 -64) by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to Terraden Corporation of Redondo Beach, California for an .count of $78,000.00 Ro recommendation or action pursuant to this report. Escrow on the above- awntiawd property closed Friday, January 9, 1986. A check in the mount of $77,106.00 was received and delivered to Finance Director to be deposited into Assessment District 82 -1 account. The property, located on 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga was sold to Terraden Corporation for an mount of $78,000.00. Fees incurred by the City from the sale of the property include a title insurance policy for $512.00 and an escrow fee of $3D0.00. A final escrow accounting report is attached. Respee ul submitted, EH�� Attachments /d3 �II7' "b pytg �twhuxct Cp 31 cuy,f�4'om+r°n aLixo piimcx� nits as -�e /8V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM i DATE: January 21, 1987 TOt City Council and City Hanger i PICK Mark I. Lorimer, Administrative Analyst ;I,/ t• SUDJECTt Purchase of Video Monitor for Comomnity Center a IECOMMEHDATI06 It is recommended that the City Council authorise the pmrehase of (1) t_ television /video monitor and (1) stand at a cost not to exceed 8800.00, and further authorise the transfer of funds from the Administration Contract Services Account (01 -4t22 -6028) to the Administration Capital Equipment Account (01- 4122 - 7044). }A"CIOUDD The television /video monitor is proposed for Lions Park Community Center in order for the City Council, staff and general public to better access information at that location. This equipment would also be used to provide training information during seminars. Presently, ows video ".miter is housed within the Administration Department for stutter purposes. Hwever, increasing usage demand and the concern for damaging the equipment as it is transferred from City Hall to the community center warrants the purchase of additional equipment. Should you wish additional information retarding the purchase of this v equipment, please contact me at your convenience. /al CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA STAFF REPORT Y r _• DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council sad City 1l111ger 1181= Jim ncrt, Administrative Services Director j SUBJECT: jj[8QRA= Cv1TT ►ICAR glOOIIV(ZNT FOR PUBLIC - - S AID SOILD_ I�fC Ustlin The City Attorney be directed by the City Conseil to establish an Ordinance establishing Insurance Certificate lgairemeeta at the levels of +; $150,000 property and personal injury for encroaehsent permits and building permits for work relating to curb eats, getters and other minor work; $500,000 proporty and personal lajmry for work resulting In cuts in or crossing sidewalks, and 81 aillioa for work resulting is cola into the istreet. 6 t lac eroundt Assembly Bill 4526 we adopted by the State Legislature and added as Section 55080 of the Coeernmest Code. This mew law specifies p that when a city requires Certificates of Insurance from individuals 7 performing work in the public right -of -way, that this requirement be established by City Ordinance. The City currently has a policy of 3 requiring Certificates Ordinance. cat Ins"muce, however# the requirement was never 3 established by Ordinance. Staff feels it is necuaary to cootimie requiring Certificates of Insurance to protect the City's Interest. The limits established in the recommendation are the minimum Iimits we feel are necessary to protect the D City. 2 t geapeetfall /y/ssuubbmitted. "3 Jim Bart g'. Administrative Services Dlrettor Inter ,A O STAFF REPORT OATS: January f rY 21, 198) OL TO: Mayor and Ha FROM: rbert of the city Council Brad Buller, City planner BY: Scott Murphy- Assistant planner S18JECi: ENYIT TENTATIVE TRACT 10 flow ds s on requ r Pea o am 319 easeeent on the testa 15 foot 1OC11 eng at ss Bin- 121-01, 02, 031 1062 -011ae Of Lot 14 and�strfan trail • 0 -. 1062 - 161 -01. 1043- 1' RECOWNDATION: eso u on a kung the rewfreriou of arfe tang approval is the frail on the rest side of Lots 14 and f of Tentative eWattrfan local II gACX4; Tract 10319. puo c erin 0n r receive inp• 1986, thee, Council conducted a f by Naito" Construction aM testf condition a' 1'"Y by the Plamtn Y dating to ee appeal The local equestrian applicant was dppeali trail tivd Tract trail Cthettorefssion qutrfn ng a ns rot necessar sfde 'f Lots 149 nd15 foot the condition Yin this Counctt stated that 15 of was deleted f partftular instance. the equestrian r0r the planning Coanlssfon Resol tiont- it fully iar nner Bb :SM:sgr 0 RESOLUTION N0. p%'04-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNOOLSA. CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING PLANNIMG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 86-170 CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10349 AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No 10349, hereinafter "Map* submitted by Walton Construction, applicant, for tha purpose of subdividing tee real property situated in the City of Rancho eucmonga. County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 57 lots on 33.2 acres of land located on the West side of Sapphire Street, south of Jam.:: Street, APM 1043- 121 -01, 02, 03, 1062 - 011 -02, 03, and 1062 - 161 -01, came before the City Council for public hearing and action on December 17, 1985; and WHEREAS, the Planning Comettssion has recoemmended toproval of the of subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission and the Engineering and Planning Divisions, reports and has considered other evidence presented At the public hearing. f, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City if Rancho Cucamonga, California, does modify Planning CoaMssion Resulution No. 86-170 to delete condition no. 18 that reads: 18- A fifteen (15) foot local "Strtan easement shall be provloed along the westerly boundary of Lots 14 and 15. J n� 44 Y... T, A Y y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATEt January 21, 198T TO: Mayor and Members of City Council PROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Coomunity Development Director Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst _,CT: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT "A" OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITT AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AOENCT FOR USE OF THE HOUSING SET ASIDE FUNDS Recommendation: Amend Exhibit "A" of the Reimbursement Agreement between the City and the Agency, dated June 18, 1986, to include the Baker /Arrov storm drain project. This is consistent with the staff recommendation made to the Redevelopment Agency. Background: In fiscal year 1906/87 a subcommittee of the Agency was appointed to study various pr- -rams for use of the restricted Housing Set Aside Funds. The subcommittee determined that a major use of the Housing Fund could be that of a neighborhood conservation program. Because of the many State restrictions for use of the Housing Funda, a Housing Study was prepared to verily that specific neighborhood conservation programs were of benefit to Qualified residential areas. The Study identified a total of 13 projects tttaling over 04. million for development by the Agency. It is the anticipation of the Agency to sell a tax allocation bond issue which will provide the funds to develop the neighborhood conservation programs. Until such time as the Agency is able to d., a bond issue, the program will be supported annually by the tax increment allocated to the Housing Fund. Because the program may span a number o, years, the Agency also filed a validation suit which fixes the findings of the Housing Study so that the projects that benefit Qualifying neighborhoods can be developed even if economic markets change in the future. In orJer for the program expenses to be considered debt of the Agency, a Reimbursement Agreement between the Agency and the City was approvad on June 18, 1986. This Agreement authorized, the Housing Funds to be used to carry out the program on a pay -as- you -go basis. Included as part of the Agreement was Exhibit W which describes the first two projects targeted by the Fund. These projests consisted of the Lover Turner storm drain, which includes the - development of a never line on Humboldt Avenue, and the Turner/Heraosa storm drain. �r �r ti,7;'� �Y• 4f z' City Staf° Ueport AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT- WHOUSINO SET ASIDE PONDS , January 21, 19ST _ ? m. Page 2 - Analysis: At the present time the Lower Turner storm drain project is not anticipated to begin construction until March 1988 due to comtraints of derign. In order to effectively continue with the neighborhood consepyatlon , �., program staff is proposing that the R1.6 million originally pledged IA this _ project be r¢- programmed to mother qualifying project. In reviewing the ` qualifying projects the Baker -Arrow storm drain appears to be the aost•71able • alternative since it is of comparable cost and can begin construction in this fiscal year. _ This substitution will not cause any delay to the development of the •, Lower - , Turner project. The Lower Turner project, since It will not. be ,ready for development until fiscal year 198T/88, will to funded from next fiscal,yearta anticipated tax increment revenues allocated to the Housing Fund. Staff has estimated that there will be auffioicnt revenues to complete the Lower Turner and Baker /Arrow storm drains as wall as contribute a substantial portion of the cost of the Turner/Beraosa storm drain. He y submitted, ,cot ¢ok Lam, , Comp unity Development Director JL /LD /kap attachment: Amended Exhibit •A• Location Maps for Exhibit "A• Projects 3 T:. .. l" r ,1, ,��{��j�„-���ti :' _fir fit• y�• q - Ij%� �a'T+1�.'"v�! ::tieS�!_'.{Y�:�S y;'t's.%'':,s Y,il. }'�r t• ..:�•'R. '- RE114BURSEMENT AGREEMENT Between the Rancho Cucamonga Redovelops:.t Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga EXHIBIT sAe Capital Improvement Projects: I. Turner Avenue/Hermosa Avenue Stores Drain generally located as follows: beginning at Poothill Boulevard go north on Turner Avenue, crossing Baseline Road and ending Just north of 19th Street at the existing Alts Loma Channel. I 2. Lower Turner Avenue Drainage System generally located us follows: beginning at Doer Creok east of Turner Avenue and north of Eth Street follow Humboldt Avenue to Turner rvenue, So north on Turner Avenue P to Peron Street, go west on Peron to Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, 6o north through the school to Ramona Avenue then north on Ramona Avenue until it intersects with Arrest Route. This Drainage System work could also include the installation of a newer line and connection on Humboldt Avenue in the vicinity of Turner Avenue. 3. Baker /Arrow Drainage System; generally located as follows: beginning on the south side of Poothill x`R+ 41 c'. s Boulevard at Baker Avenue and extending south to Arro w Highgy, then east a �y, to the existing Cucamonga Creek channel (west of Vineyard Avenue). W� �,y'�, • is =��"� >L� "! # ",i3'e'w.6+�•L,t�Y:y �:r {d�. -s�. _ r�L.�.. a-:.. i�.;:;}e�GyY�S l.i I I H i I ww t PROJECT 43 im =NM ZE FIIEEW V VA „ .Al • -,��'. ., �1"�it^tb3y..w��:::2!'x'. 93' ?. +i• ^{.;t�•.f:: iN�V'�•.2._�s.�N..a... c.. .�d •�. fir::. 3:t ia`�Ap 0 ,y rT V nT. V eNrvn rrTreMMMA STAFF REPORT DATE January 21, 1987 TO: city Council and City Manager PROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B Pulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval to Commence Student Intern Prooram to Aselst with Geographic Information Beaten Setup and Mapping, This Activity is Funded Through The Contract Service Account in the Applicable Assessment Districts and Will Not Exceed 82.600. It is recommended that city Council approve the Implementation of a student intern program to assist with Geographic Information System setup and mapping with a limit not to exceed $2,600. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: During fiscal year 1986/87 it coot the Assessment Districts $68,244 to have consultants and the County of San Bornardino prepare and place the assemmment spreads on the tax toll. Staff can computerize Rancho Cucamonga's Assessment Districts by placing them on the Geographic Information System This will require the assistance of college students on a part time basis because of the magnitude of the work load The estimated cost for this project is $2,600; It should save the Assessment Districts over 870,000 In fiscal year 1987/88 and $360,000 over the next five years. Reespeecttfully Submitted, pA zzo Assistant City Manager RAR:JBP:kmm /93 �/ M is R f r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 15, 1087 TOs City Council and City Manager PROM: Jim Martin, Plan Check Coordinator SUBJECTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AOREMIENT AMENDMENT BETWEE.Y THE CITY AND VL SYSTEMS, INC. RECOZIENDATION: Staff recommends the attached amendment to Professional Services Agreement #0085 -88 be approved by the City Council. The attached document represents amendmants to the ahove referenced Professional Services Agreement, made necessary due to changes In emphasis from production of maps to development of data that can be used with the recently acquired Geographic Information System. Additionally, the Increase of development activity and unanticipated delays In acqulation of necessary data has altered the timetable for completion. These amendments have no effect on the overall contract price. The attached agreement has been prepared under the supervision of the City Attorney and Is forwarded to the City Council for consideration. JM:11 /9S/ r j AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amendment to Professional Services Agreement is made and entered Into as t of the 21st day of January, 1987, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and VL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). That Professional Services Agreement by and between CITY and CONSULTANT dated June 27, 1985 ( "the Agreement" hereinefterl hereby is amended In the following respects and, except as so amended, the Agreement and each and every term and provision therein contained shall remain in full face and effect. 1. CONSULTANT atoll update all maps delivered to CONSULTANT from CITY files recorded from January 15, 1985 to, and Including, April 15,1986 at the rate of :x.50 per parcel. In addition to the completion of the original project as defined within the original "Scope of Work" and as revived within this amendment, CONSULTANT will be responsible for input of reference data for date layer 80 as It relates to maps recorded from January 15, 1985, to and Including April 15, 1986. Further, the CONSULTANT need only Input data from reference documents reeiaved from the CITY, for data layers 14,15, and 17. Payment for updating Is to be paid within 30 days of CITY receipt of an Itemized invoice from the CONSULTANT. 2. CITY shall provide to CONSULTANT on or before February 20, 1987, ah referenced documents avallable from CTfY files necessary for data input by CONSULTANT. Any remotning documents, excluding these relating to layers 8, 14, 15 and 17 as noted In 91 above, required to complete said data Input not received at CONSULTANTS offices on or before the above - referenced date shall be ceeured by nM through the efforts of CONSULTANT. The costs for such data acquisition billed to CONSULTANT by the County of San Bernardino or by any other source shall be reimbursed by CITY within thirty (30) days of receipt of an itemized bill reflecting thew .7 costs, All such billings must be received by CITY no later than July 17, 1987 to be - ++ f reimbursable pursuant to this paragraph. � �7 � �Jiz321���w.: a .. -_ _ L•• � nu`'�j- ��.lfi3�. t 3. In lieu of supplying mylar plats to CITY as indicated In the original Scope of Work provided for In the Agreement, CONSULTANT will furnish verification plots, on vellum, reflecting caere -Lions and updates for all sections. Those verification plots will be s4l.mitted to CITY in the same format as check plots currently recelved. Additionally, those ve iflcatton plots will depict all data layers, Including layers 12,13,14, 15, and 17. Data layers 14, 15, and 17 may, at CONSULTANTS option, be plotted at a scale not smeller then one inch equals 1,000 feet. The new verification plots showing t cor • ections for all data layers except layers 11, 14, 15 and 17 may be Umited In area to a minimum of U18 section so long as all corrections indicated are shown on said verification plots. All verification plots for all sections located within CITY'S boundaries east of Haven Avenue are to be submitted to CITY no later then April 17, 1987. The balance of the verification plots, including areas outside the CITY'S boundaries as depicted In the origins. agreement are to be received by CITY no later then October 2,1987. 4. CONSULTANT shall provide an Interim data tape reflecting updates and i� corrections of all data layers for all sections within the CITY boundary east of Haven � Avenue no later than May 92, 1987. A final data tape reflecting the balance of the f project will be submitted to CITY no later thin November 0, 1987. 5. CITY stall be provided ten (10) waking days to review the balance of check plots and all verification plots submitted to CITY by CONSULTANT subsequent to the i date of this Amendment. All such plots are to be hand delivered or provided to CITY by a mail delivery service The ten-day period of time shall commence to run upon hid r delivery to CITY or delivery of any such plot to the mall sautes. Likewise, CITY shell } hand deliver or provide corrective plots to CONSULTANT by a mail service. The i conclusion of the ten -day period provided for In this paragraph 5 stall be calculated upon j C CITY either hand delivering any such plot to CONSULTANT or providing any such plot to -'S a mail service. Deliveries sent via the U.S. Post Office shall be certified. /9G "3+ 2. J » =•a ACyW; Ii"t.�i:`:Y��. ice. YfYj .. - e.�r1�.�� .. s .._ .. .: tAt LTI•IIY�i t, i• b Y' ty Y,.. All plot" are to be returned to CONSULTANT with Additionally, with the a: caption correction marked in red b( plots depleting ' comments and "ectiOCa are to be c date layers 11, 14, IS and 17, sU CITY cawlidated Onto One return Plot. CONSULTANT may conidsr check or having been verification Plots for Individual sections as within said tart - approved by CITY if not received back with correcti day Period on. by CONSULTANT a. Subeectlon C-2 (d) and C-2 (f) stated In the Agreement are hereby amended So that the amount Payable by CITY to CONSULTANT reduced to the amount of 501488.00 pursuant to Section C-2 (d) Shall be final verification plot referred to above thirty (20) days following delivery of the CONSULTANT the Mount payable by ,;ppy Pursuant to subsection C-2 (f) of the Agreement shall be increased to to 17,452.00 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered Into this Amendment to Professional Services Agreement as of the 213t day of January, 1937. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By blayor By City Clerk VL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED By. BY 9. � •r CITY OF RANCHO CUC k?AONGA STAFF REPORT � R n o DATE: January 21, 1987 � � T0: City Council and City Manager Fyn FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy !costa, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 10827, 10827 -1, 10827 -2 and 10827 -3 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 29 and setting the date of public hearing for February 19, 1987 RECD MDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation 29 and setting the date of Public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to L.•idscape Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's fi,tent to annex Tract Nos. 10827, 10827_1, 10827 -2 and 10827.3 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation No. 29 and setting the public hearing date for February 18, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Respectf , subaitted, At:acheents IN .a RELCC : r N a U 9 T R f E 9 15757 W'01" 8110- S�o U670 woe e4 38.3836 f2 +3: ; sae 3 3<ae B0 X" :. APril 4, 1986 i City of Rancho Cucamonga DtPartaent of Public Works 9320C Semolina Rod Rancho Cucamonga, Calif 91730 Rat Tract No. ~-Tract No. 10827 -2, ad Tract No. 10827 -3 Centlemant You art hereby respectfully rtqueatd to annex the above- reftrancd tracts - to the City's tandacape N+intenanct DSstrict. Your unUrmtending and cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated. f, very truly yours, RELCO rNDOS"=eS t Direct w` t PJNtlrh t 4 Y 4, .: S. .:s% Q{i; � P°'} S;( %��Y+�!�g,�y'F *?���r •C}' A�' Jr�::i' '. 3 � �'4- � RELCO N 7 U S T R, S S 6757 W,anma B.aa. S,.2e c870 l.os t..962a Cal 90038 3838 121 J) 938.3488 December 19, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works 9320-0 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 REt Tract 108271 Greetings: You are hereby respectfully repussted to annex the above - referenced tract to the Clty b Landscape Maintenance District. Your understanding and cooperation in this mattar will be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, `RREELLLCf-On ^INDUSTRIES �7 Peter Novak Director of gavel., At PN/kf t � j1.a LY. ll Yr 1 O Y1 +•e•ifi..lw _ Js'rr4411��.: _.. '_2..r. vaa :.:y: .,. P Y . .e C.F. -t ;1 Val �. 11yWR':ki n'4^• a a J RESOLUTION N0. "-0-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY CUE P" ' REPORT FOR ANNEXATION No. 29 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on January 21, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clark of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, Which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucasonga as follows: expenses SECTION ilrprk and of tteIne dentalsexpensesfin connection thereuith,E contained in said report be, and each of them ara hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That thy diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr to said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment a;wn the subdivisions of land in sait7lssssment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for fFe proposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district f 0?0/ 'S C CITY OF RANCHO CuCA40NGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION NC, 29 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Nos. 10827, 10627-1, . 2 and 10827.3 SECTION 1. Authorit_�y fo`�ort This report is in Compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State (Landscaping and Lighting Art of 1972). of California SECTION 2. General Descrl flan This City Council has elected to annex all raw subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District Nn. 1. The City Council has determinEd that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 10827, 10827 -1 10827_2 and 30821 -3 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to tho City of Rancho Cu(.amonga. SECTION 3. 91ans and Sneciflcatlons The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. is hereby fordtheo actslocation ofytheplandscap areas The Plans and specifications for landscaped isprovmiaent on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent d•, if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECT'ON 4. Estimated Costs No casts will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that square foot Per year aThesemcosts arresestimated equal actual( assessments per be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape i (includng Annexation No. 29 coeprised of 653,9 Maintenance District No. 1 area) d shown below: 90 square feet of landscaped i. �c fatal Annual Nalntenance Cost YTD $.30 X 653,990 square feet $26,754.00 Per Lot Annual Assessment $206 754 '333� $31.09 Annexation Per lot Monthly Assessment i4pf31.09 $2.59 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached ascessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation Involves frontage along arterial or Collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Dlaoram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram 1s attached to this report and labeled •Exhibit AN, by this reference the diagram 1s hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable number of dwelling units peralot parceor shall be proportional to the The City actual assessments cbased 1ponothe actuallcosts rIncurred by the to Citytdrduring the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets Public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public 4earig, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. S. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in Juno, the City Council conducts a public hearing and i - approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. tK a0 'Yxxt : .. Y' n� t +'.�-r�� r ,, r 1:1..x•: yz:r.r� %,,,a .�_ , > �:{3�• � :- ', .. , A'oYerties ., ,y j, vr.:: ,.may -.t __ •�`•: • •w t' •CAF•. ; 1 r Lidscipe M+fntM and n 1reveee�rfeto Included within An nexation n to NU MINTANM AREA • 10827_1 321 10827 -2 N!YM Avtnue 10827.3 7,600 38, 728 t rya u RESOLUTION NO. Q7 — 03 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 29 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TUNE AND PLACE FOR HEARING ONJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE RE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tlon of Mork: That the public interest and convenience�re a s e litention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described In Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in Connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of ibrk: The foregoing described work is to be located wiTEF1nroadway r— fight way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on Baps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation No. 29 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1'. SECTION 3. Descrl Lion of Assessment District: That the conteaplatewor .--in the opinion or said y council. is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain •Map of Annexation No. 29 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 14 heretofore approved by the City Council of said City N* ^esolution No. *, indicating by said boundary �O6 lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which cap Is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 1. ` Report of Engin�ne_r: The City Council of said City by Resolutions No. F has approved i�rc r of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 29 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1' is on file !n the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected aii e�same tae n same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City ud said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on February—IDS7, a a our a n ie City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property In which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest 1s not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propos -ed- all be done a cn3 err ,rough inn pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be eade pursuan to Section 61961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Re ort a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of cur o, California, and circulated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. .107 _ y_. E T • eta �+J� -. nmmr na n • vn,fn n - -STAFF REPORT.o 8 OATS: January 21, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council On FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT--AND GENERAL'PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -04A - 4111 K R/VR.TI WYTITW. - M, Gy1,1165"V11 W .,. NR a ev .use a en •o neraI Plan a0follows: a. (Preis' a.1 and a.2) - Five acres of land, 260 feet to 660;feet west and'280•feet to 585 feet'north of the northwest corner of Haven and Highland Avenues,'APN 201- 262 -28, portion of 30, 201- 262 -31, 41,,43, 201- 262-01 through 25 from Cedium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), and; b. ( Parcel b) - 1.55 acres of land on Haven Avenue 665 feet north of Ntghland Avenue, APN 201- 262 -36, 37, from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units /acre) to either Office or Low MEd(um Residential (4 -8 dwelling units /acre), and; c. (Parcel c) - 3.90 acres of land at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue, south of the -future realignment of Highland Avenuo, APN portions Residential esidential (8 -1426 dwellingl� f units /acre) to either Neighborhood Commercial or Office. a. (Parcel a.l and a.2) - Five acres of.sland, 260 feet to 660 feet west and 280 feet to 585 'feet north of the northwest corner of Haven and Highland Avenues, APR 201- 262 -28, portion of 30, 201- 262 -31, 41, 43, 201 - units /acre)Wgto 25 from m (Low-Medium, edd 4 -84 dwelliM units /acre), and; b. (Parcel b) - For 1.55 acres of land on Haven Avenue 665 feet north of Highland Avenue, APR 201 - 262 - 36,-37, from 9P (Medium, 8 -14 dwelling units /acre) to either "OP" (Office /Professional) or •LM• (Low - Medlum), and; c. (Parcel c) - 6.2 acres of land at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue, south of .the future realignment of Highland Avenue, APR portions of 201 - 262 -30 31 and 40 from •M+ (Medium, 8 -14 dwe ?1i units /acres to either •NC" (Neighborhood Commercial) - or •OP• (Office /Professional), r _ A 1 a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT , January 21, 1987 EPA 86 -04A - City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Comaission recoerends that the City mane approve the General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment as follows and indicated on Exhibit 1: a. Parcel a.1 and a.2 (a total of 5 acres): Approve General `- Plan and Development District amendments from Medium, Residential to Low-Medium Residential. b. Parcel °.b (1.55 acre' S): • Approve General Plan and Development- District amendments from Medium Residential to office. c. Parcel 'c '(3.90 acres): 'General Plan and Development District amendments from Medium Residential to Office. , If the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval -and Draft Ordinance would be appropriate. , II. BACKGROUIO AND ANALYSIS:. On November 15, 1986 the City Council rev%ke a reques y e Clurman Company to change the subject properties from Medium Residential to Neighborhood Commercial Denial was recommended by the Planning Commission. The City' ° Council felt that while a Neighborhood commercial Land Use would not be advisable for the entire, northwest corner of Haven and Highland Avenues, alternative land uses might be more appropriate - than the existing Medium Residential. As a result, the Cicy Council directed that a new amendment be initiated for Planning Commission consideration of specific land use configurations contained in this report which. The Clurmum applications which were continued until review of the new amendments was completed are - rescheduled for review at the February 3rd City council meeting. III. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission`at its meeting of ece er 10, 1986 held a public hearing to consider the proposed General Plan and Development District changes. The Commission found that certain portions of the site which abut Haven Avenue and the future freeway right -of -way are not appropriate for residential use and should therefore have an office land use designation. Further, the Planning Commission determined that the westerly portion of the site and the adjacent condominium project should be reduced in density to Low Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) in - order for future developments to be* compatible with the adjacent Single Family neighborhoods. The Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report are attached for your review. CITT'COU MC, it' SiAFF-REPORT January 21, 1987 GPA 86 -04A -'City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Respectfully submitted, - Brad Buller C Attachments: Planning Comelssion Staff Report of December 10, 1986 Planning Comm ission Minutes of December 10, 1986 Planning Commission Resolution No. 86- 183, 86 -184 Correspondence to Planning Commission Draft Resolution and Ordinance r• z�> f•I.�I /LY (OJd !L) VAC14Nr nVAC4AV ,W,VA,JW,yoio (NCA�w�/dIMe EX /sTU� �vaa.yL�JGG�ts !'I'�FOtcwm� � i A�f /CB I wxom4 "W; 7b I i f � L"/.,o/60 /t/,W CI.N)�� ,Neeatuv 70 J W,fO /" (.u) To OfFI" 1 .O/Om v ezl r" ,v�S�.V/A.rt!aa0 C�W.f/�•1'CUL C.tJC) /YJrtIrE oze4 . 4e 1119 -V44AW /1leWaf �t/otry Recommended Land Use Changes 1 EXHIBIT t M• ,y9x r 1 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT' DATE: Deceabor 10, 1986 �. TO: Chainrn and Masi of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Yerren, Associate PUnrer SXJECT: 1 ASSELWE AID GEREPAL•'PLAO AKRPW W0M- �1�11PSl1G81d - M application to amend the Tn use element of the General Plan +s follows: a. (tercels a.1 and a.2) - Five acres'of land, 260 feet to 660 feet rest and 280 feet to 585 feet north of the northwest corner. of Haven end Highland Avausi, -APO 201 - 262 -28, portion of 30, 201-262-31,,41, 43,•201- 262-01 through 25 from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) to Law MMedim Baidestial (4 -8- dwelling units per acre), and; b. ( Parcal b) 1.55 acres of,land on Haven Avenue 665 feet north of Highland Avenue, APO 201- 262 -36, 37, from M+dty' Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) to ., either Office or Law Mathes Residential (4 -8 dwelling units /acre), and; c. (Parcel W 3.90 acres of land at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue, south of the future realignment of Highland Avenue, APO portions of 201- 262 -30, 31, and 40 from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /scre)•to either)MeigbbeiMod Caaaeerctsl or Office. ERYIR r- RT - CITY CF RNKWI CUCAIbmiA - M application to amend the Developwnt District Map as follows: a. (Parcel a.1 and a.2) Five acres of land, 260 feet to 6jO feet west end 280 feet to 585 feet north of the northwest corner of Haven and Highland Avenues, APO 201 - 262 -28, portion of 30, 201- 262 -31, 41, 43, 201- 262-01 through 25 from *W (Medium, 8-14, dwelling , units /acre) to •LW (Low-Medium, 4 -8 dwelling - units /acre), and; b. (Parcel b) For 1.55 acres of land on Haven Avenue 665 feet north of Highland Avenue, APH 201- 262 -36, 37, from OW (Medium, 8-14 dwelling units /acre) to either 'OP' (Office/Professional) or *LW (Lw•Madium),;and; c. (Parcel e) 6.2 acres of land at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue, south of the r, /,f ITEH N .. ' .: r y; i MINK COMMISSION �VF REPORT 86 -M AND WA & d6 mber 10, 1966 N2 c. (Parcel c) 6.2 acres of land at the northwest corner of haven Avenue and Highland Avon", south of the future realf se"t of Highland Avenue, API 9.14 dwelling of 201- 262 -30 31 and 40 from -W (IMdlue, 6-14 duelling units /acre{ to either W (Neighborhood Commercial) or 'W (Off lce/Profestional). Please refer to the exhibits for clarification. I. ABSTRACT: A 6*wral Plan I t and Development District 7eenien-E' is requested to ctwnge• for separate parcels from the present Medium Residential designation (6-14 dwelling units 'per acre) to Neighborhood Comm ial, Office and /or Lw4b4f a (4-6 dwelling units per acre), for selected sections of'12.7 acres of property located at t.1e northwest corner of (even and Highland Avenues. This is a City initiated application in response to a City Council request. At this meeting, the Planning Commission should make a detarrtnation on the proposed General Plan and Development Din rfct changes. Staff analysis will canter on the General Plan An AWnt 4nd any recommendations on the General Plan will also apply A the similar Development District categories'. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: 71TT4 r of Haven and Highland Avenues. B. Site Area: 12.7 acres (gross) total. Parcel a.I • 1.76 acres Parcel 2.2 • 3.20 acres Parcel b • 1.55 acres Parcel c • 6.20 acres C. Existing Zoning: Medium ('H') Residential D. Eclstln Land Use: Stngle family hoses and detached res m a con o• 110TH IM with the majority of the property vacant. E. Surroundi�ng�Land Usa and Zoning: 11- orE��n an n i3hbortood Commercial ('HC') District. South - Vacant in the Low ('L') District. East - Shopyying center (under construction) in the Nelghbarhood Commercial ('NC') District. West - Single family development in the Low ('L') District. ,v -z a —VF 1 PLOMING COMMISSION REPORT GPA 86 -04A AND DOA L JS i. December 10, 1986 Page 3 F. General Plan Desi moans: dultcl.- T+rtcE3 e - um North - Neighborhood Commercial. South - Proposed freeway. East - Neighborhood Commercial. , Nest - Lew (2 -4 du/&c).. G. Site Characteristics: iM 'subject site is predominantly vacant rtM primary vegetation. Topography is =41111y4 flat an' slopes slightly from north to south. The - condominium project at the northeast corner is heavily planted with mature sucalyptus,trees.,. I1I. ANALYSIS: Backgro_un�d: This application is a result of City Council review of en,raT —PTan Amendment 86 -038. In response to a Planet - Commission recommendation for denial of the above mmntioned requests for this site, the City Council requested that the Planning Commission consider a modification of the original application. Instead of retaining the entire site for residential purposes, City Council requested that the Commission consider the. following: •- Parcel a.1 of the site be considered for Law - Medium Residential, and; Parcel b be considered for either Office or Low - Medium Residential, and; Parcel c be considered for either Neighborhood Commercial or Office. Major issues which were important to the review of GPA 86 -038 and DOA 86 -03 are essentially the same for this application with a fen variations. These issues are as follows: A. Rc%li9nment of Highland Avenue: As a' result of future KOULO 33 oevelopment, Highra—R37venue is to be realigned northeasterly through the site. This actual result in a major division of the vacant portions of the site into three separate parcels of appproximately 1.55, 1.76 and 3.90 acres (See Exhibit W . The Commission should take into account the resultant parcels size, shape, access and location. a y /J -3 G a' MEN pLA MIMG CommisStOM '-%FF REPORT GPA 86 -04A AM OOA 8. J8 December 10, 1986 page 4 8. Parcel a.1.- 1.76 acres will back uu1pp to an existing condominium pirq�ectfttoo�lthe north. and has sa 560 foiottfrdetage Onn the future Highlappnead Avenue. This site will have a - triapproai shalt' 300 feet. set back from Haven Avenue Parcel b, 1.55 acres, will front on Haven Avenue pith a 200 foot depth, bordered an the side by a realigned west andhlAVacant C Single oama eial Parcel to the north This location my not lend itself to a quality residential site unless combiW with the condominium Protect to the west. This potential seems very unlikely office uses may offer the best alternative from a land use' relationship standpoint. Parcel c, the 3.90 acre portion will be bordered on three sides by NaJor roadways (Haven, Highland, and a freeway on- ramp). Such an arrengeoant dues not lond itself to an opti" living e-Atr - en...in a`t.tf woould parcel a.2, in the northwesterly corner of the application site, is Presently developed as a residential Condominium, at a density 1res lied use existtying 8 -14 dwelling gg family renotion. It is sidential residential development and Y vaunt coymaercial property to the north. In a review of each parcel, the viability of com•ercial or offiai use as ooposed to multiple family uses should be consia'ered. Heed for additional commercial land: At taff's request, alp can or prepared economic analysts of the land use change to help determine if additional commercial land is warranted for studypappea appeared too community. ndictee that The conclusions services could be viable in the immediate area. 1 6 l's PPA 86LAWW1N0Q C0WlSSION —VF MT G-OM t1 Awo MA & Je oecetler 10, 19e6 Page C. Celationshi to General Plan: The General Plan defines f� s lneludes�hrhtppp designation as a and use commercial close te pruvidenassen�t/als retail goodt and vicinity.* te the restdenta or ttcupanU in the iftudfae vicinity.• The office designation is described Is 'Integrated coeglaxes shall be encouraged to provide areas where Ofla this �dlsuW ouseffuetesgroan be located. The intent Proliferation of inat ry is to prevent the C=ord &l use is permitted al isolated offices. category include administrative lnanthe office use Offices; business and support services. financial, insurance, and real estate services; supportive semurei.* uses such as a restaurant; and aedfcal services. Since this site is adjacent U a portion of haven AV"" which 13 commercialized (Lucky's Center, gas station), an office development 1n would not M this Immediate area 1n conflict with the General Plan provisions, and could provide support mad ancillary services. The Low- iledlum (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) designation Zero hlotcline. duPletypical nd other gcerUle conditfonsfaeito 4 -6 townhouse ;yoe units. This Category appropriate within the Low density areas ry encad bbe greater housing diversity without changing the single tally character of the surrounding character. The Potential for the parcels, a.i and b to be dove in constraints of tyhe parceltst slcndb cnfj�Ud by the a maximum designation, site a.1 would be giistteds to At a meal. of 14 units and Parcel b te 12 units. Cancl� }mss; Pastel a.l which &butts a single fully development in the condominium project appears approprlaU for a continued esi r )deistal designation.• Since the condominium project (Sit, appropriate d°"loped LO Lit• density standards 1t would be utPer eCre. This would farm apn acceptable Va sit o�nlzora' IV -,6' Ale. ljm.. PLANNING COMISSION ^ AFF RMT .` GPA 86 -OM AND DOA E. 08 ;- December 10, 1986 Page 6 to the single family 'L' (2-4 dwelling uniU per acre) district to the 'West. - Parcel a.2 fronting on the condominium projact is situated as a potential land use buffer, along Norm. Avenue. This site presents sow difficulty in residential development due to its small MR. shallow depth and limited residential appeal 'by being off a major arterial. At the existing W dansity'11 units could be developed, and only -12 units if the?'l11' designation 1s applied. Sinn garden office, complexes are generally accepted as suitable transition• uses between more prereraoie at tnss ioce mm m an tm on. IT tna ria�g IA•leSl' concurs with this office alternative, it would'be appropriate to note any development measures desired to mitigate potential impacts to the condominium project (i.e. substantial building setbacks, and /or limitation of second story windows facing , west, etc. to protect the resident's privacy). Parcel c is the one area, from staff's view, which should not be retained In a residential designation from a land use relationsAip, either neighborhood commercial or office would be appropriate. concerns about traffic and access issues adjacent to the future freeway may 'tip the scales' in favor of an office use. IV. ENVtR0NHEKTAL ASS°3SNENT: The initial study has been completed by staff and revi@m in the environmental check list, Part 2 of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed amendment and district changes. It is anticipated that the issue of vehicular access adjacent to the freeway right- of-way can be successfully mitigated at the project level. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the C:mistssion upon examination of the General Plan slant and Gr,elopm nt District Amendment dente that changes would promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan and would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts as Usted under the environmental asseesment, the following findings are necessary for approval: ?A 0 -0�OM r8 RE►GRi Oecaeber 10. 1 W B` Page 7 A' The ees of the a not Conflict NLh the trod use Policies o} the General 8• The amen Plan; and eleeenbpd is do prppte the go' of the land use C. The stae not be 110terfally YI. detrfsaennteowjento tAe a4l+cenproperties. injurious or a1 1C P- ro �n ThIs n ��ersp advertised as A Public haarin YII. REC 300 fat of • and notices sent to T SUff recow Project site. andel a. (a total 1end+tfons are noted below: Derell and a.2 of S acres): p Low- Iledium Residential. iee"dmta frq MM1�rove es 4entta plan Parcel Dawndfets fr acres) Nyfowv@ General plan and peent to District Parcel c (3, to Office. Develop"nt Districts: Can approval oI, General Plan office. ree Medlin Residential two attachedo�oluti concurs N resolutions th this 0ea'"dation General Plan aaenysn ofeending . royal to . adoption of cit, xe of a negatlw declaratioel�t Del roprladentil Of Respectfully suteri �' and �. grad 1 ,p City Planner BB:Al(: to Attachexntse Exhibit *Am Rlsolutfe .- - Yicinit� Edmd Use s� 4 VACA.Vr S we ,W- V11ea,Fh'0ao v�c�,vr I (NC�W� /At C l /.ciytE EXisr/� ctz�aoywruys I.IrEOicw �o � iA.N /LY I j Off /CE cK� SbN / //f/{, C'E.t/TCd OVA lela?VrLICj CEO /U�a/ (�i/) 7b IlQtl>�I6 I Low ; La/✓,uso /�,+, (L.W) � � .vE.�.V�O,rpDOo G� \..�'�tlf✓ o- 1 �,I�INc� /rj.VSorif�o00 � � ru >u,�E F..•cE�u�� , .Ciy.vr c+s' ldAY ' - Proposed Land Use Changes A)- EXHIBIT p� 14 . � IT• li,! Y I - Mull -Ell 1V 1, 1 to: LSI LM Chaney College MO LMT h FC M CITY or GENERAL PLAN MAP DESIGNATION - RAI CHO CUCAMO.\GA >TCLb G. era RPl4n D D a 8 08 �Mi11KC DI\ILSIQY 7TItglGeneral Plan S DeVelO Pment DiftriCt4 E\HIIY[1 n SCALD ,u -9 ;a0 i� ;15 ,. RESOLUTION N0. 86 183 A RESOLUTION OF TAE PLANNING C AANC OjpISSION OF THE CITY OF GEN lq CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REcoWNDING APPROVAL OF EARL PLAN AMENDMENT No. 86 -04A. MENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT _OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM 11EDIUN DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (8.14 OU /AC) TO OFFICE FOR 3.9 ACRES, OFFICE FOR 1.55 ACRES, AND LOW - MEDIUM FOR 5 ACRES OF LMID " LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE - APR 201- 262 -28, 30, 31, 36i 37, 40, 41, 43, AND 201- 263 -01 THR00GH 25, WHEREAS, The Planning Ccemisslon has held a duly advertised- public 86 -OIA. hearing to consider all coe.ents on the proposed General plan Amendment No. followin SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Coe�tsstan herby nukes the -Tin g �7gg=; A. the Amendment does' not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, 8. Tlement. he Amendment ,promotes goals of the Land -Use E ' C. The Amendment would'not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. follows; SECTION 20_ 'The General Plan Land Use Map shall be amended as A. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 262 -23, 31, 41, 43, 3 201-263-01 eapProximately 5acres in sizesh be changed from ' Medium Density (8 -14 du /ac) Residential to Low - Medium Residential (4-8 du /ac) 8. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201 - 262 -36 and 37, approximately 1.55 acres in size shall be changed from Medium Density (8-14 du/ac) Residential to Office. C. The portions of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201 -262- 30, 31, and 40 south of the future realignment of HfShland Avenue and north of the future freeway right -of -way, approximately 3.9 acres in size shall du/ac) to Office. be changed frw Medium Density - Residential (4-14 � December 10, C19" Cr TNCNO CUCANONOA Page Z adoption 1 Council Negative t Dec, rem Plan hereby rK�ended for based the capletion and findings ofor the initial Study, ��t. Wde upon Planning Cam' isston os hereby R��d that the It Cucmm Aeendeent No. the City Council. approval of Boners, plan APPROVED , -. LANK mlwfi ADOPTED TNIS 10TH DAY OF DECEIrER, 1986. Tl1E CITY W RANCND MAMMA on th, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ComrSSIGNERS: _ ..n luffaTng rotato -fit w Ctr'MISSr0AFR5: WITIEA, TOLSTOY, BARKER, NCNIEL NONE CO MISSICNERS; NONE RESOLUTION NO. 86-184 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 86 -08 REQUESTING A CHANCE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM (N) TO OFFICE /PROFESSIO A (OP) FOR 6.2 ACRES, OFFICE/ PROFESSIONAL (OP) FOR 1.55 ACRES, LOW- MEDIUM (IN) 4 -8 DU/AC FOR S ACHES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE - APN 201- 262 -26, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43, AND 201 - 263.01 THROUGH 25. WHEREAS, on the 19th day of November, 1966 an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on tha,10th day of December, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the follow —i g- Ff— nWngs: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terra of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding propertifs; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Development District Map shall be amended as follows: Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 262 -28, 31, 41, 43, portion of 30, and 201 - 263-01 through 25, 260 feet to 660 feet west and 280 feet to 585 feet north of the northwest corner of Haven and Highland Avenues shall be changed from Medium (N) District to Low - Medium (LM) District. Assessor's Parcel Number 201 - 262 -36, 37, 1.55 acres of land fronting on Haven Avenue, 665 feet north of Highland Avenue shall be changed from Medium (N) District to Office /Professional (OP) District. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DOA 86 -08 - CITY Cr WCHO CUCANONGII , December 10, 1986 Page 2 C. The portions of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 262 -30, 31; 40, 43 south of the future realignment of Highland Avenue and north of the existing alignment of Highland Avenue, approximately 6.2 acres in size 'hall be changed from Medium (N) District to Office /Professional (OP) District. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Ccm.issicn has found that this pro eo will not create a significant adverse _impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on December 10, 1986. NON, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 658SS of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 10th day of December, 1986, District Change No. 86 -08. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt District Change No. 86 -08. 3. That a Certified Copy of the Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commisslon shill be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. PLANNI f jQMI� fdFO ' HE CITY OF RAMCHO CULAWNGA " BY: C 5 v a ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of'the Planning Sammission of the City of ' Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December, 1966, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY. CHITIEA, BARKER. HCNIEL LADES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE } ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE `•' gay.`; 4 1 N. EXVIROAHENTAL ASSESSMENT MD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-04A - CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMDK�i - An application to amend tne land use element of e enema an as olluws: a. (Parcels a.1 and a.2) - Five acres of land, 260 feet to 660 feet west and 280 feet to 585 feet north of the northwest corner of Haven and Highland Avenues, APN 201- 262 -28, portion of 30, 201- 262-31, 41, 43, 201- 262 -01 through 25 from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units /acre) to Law Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), and; b. (Pawl b) 1.55 acres of land an Haven Avenue 6b5 feet north of Highland Avenue, APN 201- 262 -36, 37, from Hedium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units /acre) to either Office or Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units /acre), and; c (Parcel C) 3.90 acres of land at the nort,west corner of Haven Avenue Ana Hignland Avenue, south of the uture realignment of Highland Avenue, APH portions of 201 - 162 -30, 31, and 40 from Medium Residential 18-14 dwelling units /acrel to either Neigxboriwod Commercial or office. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMEWOMO:NT 86-00 - CITY analication to amend tne Develoacent District d a. (Parcel a.1 and a.2) Five acres of land, 260 feet to coo feet west and 280 feet to 585 feet nortn of the northwest corner of Haven and Highland Avenues, APN 201- 262 -28, portion of 30, 201- 262-31, 41, 43, 201 - 262 -01 through 25 from *or (Medium, B-14 dwelling units /acre) to -LK- (Low - Medium, 4 -8 dwelling units /acre), and; n. (Parcel o) For 1.55 acres of land on Haven Avenue beb feet north of Hiynlano Avenue, APN 201 - 262 -36, 37, fray wM' tKedium, B-14 dwelling units /acre) to eitner OW (Office /Professiona)) or *LW (Low- Medium). and; C. (Parcel c) b.2 acres of land at the northwest corner of Maven Avenue and Highland Avenue, soutn of toe future realignment of Highland Avenue, APH portions of 2U1- 262 -3U, 31 and 40 from 'Ir medium, 8-14 dwelling units /acre) to either 'TIC' (Neignoorhooa Convercial) or *OP' (Office /Professional). Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that the Planning Comvission had been presented witn letters from Boo Young - b342 Haven Avenue, S. Craig Justice - 6330 Haven Avenue, and beurae Goblin - od44 Maven Avenue, expressing their opinons on the item before toe Comvission. Commissioner uHtlea was concerned with access to this Project, if parcels d.l ana a.2 were cowineu Aitn access limited limited to Hiltoldna Avenue, site asked %,tat staff's recommendation would be. Planning Co®ission Minutes -8- December 10, 198b , .2 ztS `1 Paul Rougeau, City Traffic Traffic Engineer, agreed that combined access would be the best properties iiP one cout��� snplkliighland then immediately inside the Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Don Clurnan, representing the Clurman Company, gave an overview of his proposal to develop the site. He concurred with the recommendations for Low Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) on Parcel a -1 and Office Professional on Parcel B. Re requested Neighborhood Commercial for Parcel C and advised that he would be acceptable to pot having access onto Haven Avenue, with access onto the future Highland alignment. Craig Justice, 6330 Haven Avenue, concurred that parcels A -1 and A -2 be designated Low Medium. He stated that the Garden Apartment Homeowners would prefer to see Parcel B remain Low Medium; however, were not adamant on that point and could see that Office Professional could be consistent with their development. He supported staff's recommendation of Office Professional for Parcel C. George Godlin, 6344 Haven Avenue, opposed the Neighborhood Commercial designation and supported Mr. Justice's recommendations. He stated concerns with the amount of commercial property currently developing in the City. He suggested that the property to the south could possibly be purchased by the City for park purposes. Floyd Allen, 6402 -A Haven, suggested that the plot plan for the Garden Apartments be provided for the Commission when they deliberate development on the adjacent land. Phyllis Allen, 6402 -A Haven, expressed concern with the Neighborhood Commercial designation for Parcel C. She supported the recommendations of Mr. Justice. Larry Bliss, 6634 Carnelian, supported Neighborhood Commercial for Parcel C. He felt that mitigation measures could be taken to buffer commercial uses from the apartments. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner ;tNiei concurred with staff's recomeendatton that parcels 3-1 and a.2 be designated Low Medium, and also concur with Office Professional desigantions for the other two parcels. Commissioner Chittea agreed and further stated that Office Professional on Parcel C would be less intensive and more compatible with the project across the street. She had traffic concerns and felt the impacts would be less intensive with that designation. She additionally supported Office Professional on Parcel B as well due to corstraints on the existing residential use. She felt that sufficient Neighborhood Commercial property was bring provided for the area with the cow .3rcial project across the street. Planning Commission Minutes -9- December 10, 1986 i p Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the Garden apartments are one of the unique ` Uesisationsu for perce�A- l which endnA� to be Protected. He supported Low Medium C. 9 2, and Office Professional for Parcels B and i Chairman Barker stated that on Parcel 8 it would be difficult to Put housing which was compatible with the existing development and felt that anything that is developed there has to be sensitive to what has become a special Aldeawyy, He felt Office would be the better alternative if handled sensitively. He supported Low Medium for Parcel " with the understanding there has to oni bttity. He felt Office was the compromise position a good deal of con for Parcel C due to c compatibility and traffic concerns. be given a greats Stated Oftconside consideration Point Of develops" shieldelitseneeds to the Garden Apartments, NO also felt thai Parcel C has to have an exceptional design in order to be compatible with the surrounding area. Additionally, he concurred that no accesses should be allowed On Haven. Motion: Moved by Chftiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Resolution recommending approval of = Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 86 -04A to the City Council with the recommendation that Parcels 4.1 and a.2 be designated LLow Mdium. and Parcels Parc 8 and C designated Office following vote: Professional. Notion carried by the AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BARKER, MCNIEL HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ' Motion: - tarried Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Chitiea, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and recommend adoption of Environmental Assessment and recommendation District at Parc Amendment . and a 2 be designated Low !Medical, ands arcels 8 and C Office Professional, Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE , - carried A, 8:45 p•1% _ Planning CO@Wssion Recessed 9 :00 p.m. _ Planning Commission Reconvened i Planning Ccavnissfon Minutes -10. December 10, 1986, W " 1. EEL 6i—vIv c RESOLUTION No. 9-7 —0 3 J.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY (Lc RANCHO PLAN DMENT NOO86.04A. MENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DU /AC) TO OFFICE FOR 3.9 ACRES, OFFICE FOR 1.55 ACRES, AND LOW - MEDIUM FOR 5 ACRES OF IAtD LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE - APN 201- 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43, AND 201- 263 -01 THROUGH 25. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised' public hearing on December 10, 1986 to consider all comments and hereby recommends approval of proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86 -04A. WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all commonts of the proposed General Plan. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby "as the following Tfndings A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. r B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. follows; SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Use Nap shall be amended as A. Assessor's Persil Numbers 201- 262 -23, 31, 41, 43, portion of 30, and 201- 263 -01 through 25 MediumiDensity5(8 14 du /ac)iResidentiale to Lowe- ladium Residential (4 -9 du /ac). B. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201 - 262 -36 and 37, approximately 1.55 acres in size shall be changed from Medium Density (8 -14 du /ac) Residential to ti Office. .I C. The portions of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 262 -30, 31, and 40 south of the future re- alignment of Highland Avenue and north of the future freeway ;t right -of -way, approximately 3.9 acres In size shall ba changed from medium Density Residential (4-14 u- du /ac) to Office. tJ r 1 ORDINANCE No. 30% AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA iFORNIA, _ AMENDING THF. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM MEDIUM •M• (8 -14 CU /AC) TO LOW MEDIUM •LN• (4 -8 OU /AC) FOR 5 ACRES, TO OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL •OP•. FOR 6.2 ACRES, OFFICE /PROFESSIONAi. ' •OP- FOR 1.55 ACRES' OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CC.LR OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE - APN 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43, AND 201- 263 -01 TI+ROUGN 25. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California„ does ordain as follows: _ SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. This City Council has hold a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That Development District Amendment No. 84 -O3E is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancno Cucamonga. C. This Development District Amendment No. 84 -038 will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby reclassifie3_ F aanner stated, and the Development District Map is hereby amended accurdingly. ' A. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 262 -23, 31, 41, 43, portion of 30, and 201- 263 -01 through 25 approximately 5 acres in size shall be ci.anged from Medium Density •M• (8 -14 du /ac) Residential to Low. Medium Residential •LM• (4 -8 du/ac). B. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 262 -36 and 37, approximately 1.55 acres in size shall be changed from Medium Density •M• (8-14 du /ac) Residential to Office/Professional *OP". C. The portions of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 262 -30, 31, and 40 south of the future re- alignment of Highland Avsnue and north of the future freeway r4ght -of -way, approximately 6.2 acres in size shali be changed from Medium Density •N• (8 -14 du /ac) to Office /Professional •OP•. r Y 1` '• ,t V Sy , AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO`'e7 I Maurine D. Paton f, do hereby certify that I am the Legal Advertising clerk of THE DAILY REPORT, a daily newspaper of general circulatica, published hi the City of Ontario, County and Stath aforesaid and that the attyched advertimmmt of Notice of Public Nearing City Council 9 -� City of Rancho Cucamonga _ was published in raid newspaper one (1) time +a , i to wit: January 9, 1987 Y + I certify under penalty pf perjury that the foregoing is true and CORCCL , lSigna Dated at Ontario, Californla this 9th day of 'v January 87 ,19_. J 1�4 MY jMr..a�wWarL.Y: Y. v �Yr,I!la 1, r. btwibfti .rM.O„WYT{� /JIl1F IYYi Ma Geese .Yl Iy N GY.I,OYWT W Gwrr. MY M,Yrn, • rrww a,Yrrnr IsN..• . rwM wrrq r ors e"IrT*Y ICV Yruco0 G � ,t* w ♦L'i LY]WM VhM,e�! ObirrtT 4rAl� all,rrl al Yf Y1 Iw �'� • i brV W. MY,r r w/Wlirr�Y'> V� N,r w r r rrr.rr .- - YD 'rte twrna YN r•• h 'I�,11MG IVMrrI-M �y il+r. OF IMIrNFrr,,,wYy \�"�f +fy1, r Mrr rwr N ,rrr}.Ra.• •,� -Wr.wV wrs i} rarw.rrrl -+x �. pa A a r! r rrrr r.w w r�qi c - r�rrrrrrrwr 3 LA r �- ��.; i'µ I:y .r:�.,}r+3e :+-�' t =' r•, ., a3C) gip- 4,+yy��et.��tye �)•1 a. q- [ '�i'khi�i -! l���h ?7a+M��e�ciaiirl "'1.<?�����'• �r al• `.i*"��r r.a: :...r u�' �' a Y , i e, 1. E I DATE: TO: FROM: B7: SUBJECT: 111,1,1 � D . 1T/.}} / 11, . ,,/.../. I STAFF REPORT r 1. j�ii January 21, 1987 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner Cynthia Kinser, Assistant Planner GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -0211 - BAWKI /N - A REQUEST TO AFLAD THE LAW USE Mr FROM LOW- MEDIUM DCHSITY RESIDENTIAL (C-8 DWELLING UNITS /ACRE) TO NEIGHBORHOOD CCNMERCIAL FOR APPROXIMATELY 5 ACRES OF LAiD. LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND ETIWAMDA AVENUE - APN: 227- 111 -24, 25, AND 26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LTlW= 5FLURG FLU FROM CS (COWUNITY SERVICE) AND LM (LOW- MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO NC (NEISHBOR1000 COMMERCIAL) FOR 9.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND ETINAMDA AVENUE - APH: 227- 111-10, 24, 25, AND 26. I. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council affirm the t:ndings of the Planning Commission and recommends dental of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendments. If the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial would be appropriate. II. BACKGROUND: At the Jul! of 16, 1986 City Cou a General Plan An a 9.4 acre site 1 Baseline. The PL proposed action at meeting. the app a meeting, an application was lent and Etiwan(U Specific Plan *d at the northwest corner of rig Commission had recommended May 28, 1986 meeting. At the aims were continued at the completion of a traffic study later part of 1966, a traffic Inted traffic consultant which the proposed land use change. .23/ J T t R. a. A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN AEM*W Wl MA ETIVAIDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMEIMiT E6 -01 January 21, 1987 Page 2 This report rill focus on the findings of the traffic report and Implications to the initial analysis of the proposal. Other issues which tha Planning CcWsston telieves are very significant In their recommenlation such as land use compatibility, Etiwnda Specific Plan conformmace, etc. are contained in the attached Planning Commission Report of May 28, 1986. III. TRAFFIC STUDY ANALYSIS The Traffic Report wes'prepared to assess the impact of changing the subject site to Nefihborhood Commercial as compared with other logical land use altvmitivvs. The alternatives included studied the niationshly of a rwarby existing neighbor cemmereiwl site in Victoria with the site requested for change. The report analyzed far (4) land use configurations as follows: ALTERNATIVE ONE provides for the 8armakfan Site (Site 1) 'a be a combination of residential and community oriented commercial- shopping area. The Victoria Site (Site 2) is provided as a neighborhood commercial shopping center (existing land use designations). ALTERNATIVE TVO provides for the ltrmakfan Site to be a neigWirhood eomme e1a1 shopping center (as requested). The Victoria Site is to be used as residential development. ALTERNATIVE TWEE provides for both the Barmakian Site (as requested) and the Victoria Site to be used as neighborhood commercial shopping centers. ALTERNATIVE FOUR provides for the 8armakfan Site to be residential development. The Victoria Site is to be developed into a neighborhood commercial shopping center. Each of the four alternattves were tested in the traffic model analysts process to order to determine the impact of each alternative and the traffic impact of each Site within each alternative. The resulting alternatives cover all combinations of land use which could reasonably occur. In particular the traffic impact analysis examined the effect of the alternate Band uses on the streets and - intersections adjacent to the commercial sites, the driveways into the sites and at selected intersections elsewhere in Ettwanda. W .t M CITY MAICiI STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN APDOWMT 96 -02A -° ETIMAIDA SPECIFIC PLAN AM OM MT 86 -01 January 21, 19117 Page 3 III. CONCLUSIONS At its meeting of llhy 28. 1986, the Planning Commission concluded that the req -•est represented a significant departure from the intaint of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan as, evidenced by: 'R 33 Each of the alternatives was tested within improved transportation network and each alternative developed more traffic than the network capacity at level of service of 'C' or better. The we condition which is consistent in all of the alternatives is the retention of Etiwande Avenue as a two lane facility. This is in accord with the currently approved planning for the area. The conclusions of the traffic consultant are as follows: 'From the traffic standpoint, Gvre is no clear cut alternative that is greatly superior to all the others, except that Alternative One (existing plans) provides better traffic service on Ettwenda Avenue at the site driveway end at the Baseline Road intersection. The comparisons of tha service levels are provided in Table 1, in the enclosed report.' According to the City 'Traffic Engineer, the report shows that retaining the existing planned land uses provides the best ` service on Etiwanda Avenue at site driveways and at the Etiwanda/Baseline intersection. It is evident that an increase in the intensity of use at the Barmakian site will decrease levels of service at the Etiwanda/Baseline intersection from 'C' to '0' (see attached Table 2) and will have a significant effect on Ettwanda Avenue immediately north of Baseline. Nhiie that is understood that Etiwanda Avenue will require additional lanes immediately at the intersection with Baseline, in any case, the proposed development would require such widening of Ettwanda to be carried farther north. These results represent conditions at build -oat of the Victoria and Etiwanda Plans. Immediate 7 effects of commercial development site wauld be much reduced. y �( An Exerative Summary of the traffic study is included with a table 'level of service interpretation' which describes the i, conditions of operation for various levels of service. III. CONCLUSIONS At its meeting of llhy 28. 1986, the Planning Commission concluded that the req -•est represented a significant departure from the intaint of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan as, evidenced by: 'R 33 ■ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT" GENERAL PLAN NEOWNT 66 -02A ETIVADA SPECIFIC PLAN NVA ENT 86 -01 January 21, 1967 Page 4 F�1 A. An inconsistency of the proposed land use ted change with the gals of the Specific Plan, and 41e b. A concern that additional traffic generation would result from increased commercial x intensity, and L C. That the proposed shopping center would be within a Quarter mile of a planned shopping center site within the victoria Planned 88:AN:te Comounity. ` Attachments: Executive Summary of the Etiwands Area Traffic Study, Staff believes the study confirms the Planning Coaission traffic { concerns for the of Pl inconsistency with the General n and Etlwande Specific Plans Figure 2 of Etiwanda Traffic Study s Staff recosends denial, however, if the City Council wishes to approve the application as submitted, staff would like Council Planning Comsission Staff Report of May 28, 1966 direction regardingy its wishes on the ylctorta Neighborhood Commercial Site. - If the Qarmakian aeeniimnt is approved, should the Victoria Site remain Comearcial or should staff initiate a Planning Commission Resolutfon 86 -68 general plan study to change its land use designation? S 4�. bra, til tfuly ted 41e l y lanar 88:AN:te Attachments: Executive Summary of the Etiwands Area Traffic Study, Alternative Analysis Figure 2 of Etiwanda Traffic Study Tables 1 and 2 of Etiwanda Traffic Study Planning Comsission Staff Report of May 28, 1966 Resolutions of Dental Planning Commission Resolutfon 86 -68 4"t Planning Cosission Resolution 86 -64 City Council Report of July 2, 186 .13r1 t S 4�. bra, til He EAST THIRD STREET , MSA 71404MI? • SAM etaMAMO1M0. CAUFOaMU•2410 _ November 22, 1988 CIVIL .we,sua,we, SURVIVING , City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Mr. Paul Eougeau II: Itiwanda Traffic Traffic Engineer Study Contract Dear Mr. Boolean: The enclosed report presents the results of tho recently completed analyses for the Itiwanda Area. The following parts of this letter provide as Executive Summary of the results of these analyses. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Each of the alternatives was tested with an improved transportation network, and each alternative developed more traffic than the network capacity at level of service "C" or better. The one condition which is consistent in all of the alternatives is the retention of Itiwanda Avenue as a two -lane facility. This is in accord with the currently approved planning for the area. from the traffic standpoint, there is no clear cut • lternative that is greatly superior to all the others, except that Alternative One (existing place) provides better traffic service an Itiwanda Avenue at the site driveway and •t the Baseline Road intersection. The comparisons of the service levels are provided in Table 1, in the enclosed report. The two prevailing conditions in each alternative are: 1) the section of Itiwanda Avenue serving Site One and 2) the auction of Victoria Park Lane serving Site Two and further north. In each alternative. the restricted width of Itiwanda Avenue (2 -lanes) is inadequate for the projected traffic, with additional capacity required (see Table 1) to provide an acceptable level of traffic service. The daily traffic on Victoria Park Lane is high in each alternative (see report figures 39 4, B. and 8) due to the proposed commercial area to the south. With Alternatives One and Three, the left turn capacity In inadequate (see report Table 1) with the proposed cross - section of victoria Park Lane. The park -like entrance north from Baseline should be re- examined in order to develop the additional capacity. .7 3.r /A N na •TM45 `r� x \` ♦ J� _ n m 4 c [X[CUTST[ !DlM,IRT -- MoveOber 22,° 1[g[ - rasa Two _ 000 caution. out. iho ce�n avaluatiia report study result• suet be obaervad, Pariseaa pert Sable 1 Pointed Table 1, eons at the cited mad footnoted lit report capacity .the service level• indicate failure of the ,a daairbe0toaura for left turns, Conse9watl t the to acobl, mt� to for special street ■actions r, it 0431 be Pro acted traffic. is this are. Pleas advise us it tbsrm are Oar 9watioo■ or of further service to the City. � if we can be Sincerelyy�,,pp n ,j Clyde Manager — Trmmapor„7rtatioa Division L" Enclosure • :r n. M Fluum 2 ANALYSIS INTERSECTION LOCATIONS EEW sftck"c anoar NMEMC710" All it t- TABLE 1 ALTIRNATIVZ ANALYSIS 11SOLTS INTINSICTION to ALTERNATIVE 4ri ZKO- We its Vic Los TIRZI Vic toi POUR Vic Itiwanda Avenue I and Victoria C .75 C .77 D .81 C .73 Avenue [3] last Avenue and Victoria Avenue D .81 D .83 D .04 C .80 (31 Victoria Park Lane and Site 2 Od-w as D 88 C .78 D 88 C .78 Victoria hrl Law) [2] (2) Stiwanda Avenue and Site 1 (Lliwndc Irirrwr) D .86 Z .97 1 .90 1 .95 . [zj [2] [z] [2j Victoria Park Lane and Baseline Road D .82 D .81 D .83 D .82 [31 Itiwanda Avenue and Baseline Road C .79 C .80 D .82 D .81 [3] Site 2 and Baseline Road (laseliw klmwr) A .56 A .64 A .56 A .58 Site I and Baseline Road (lwiln erinwd A <.54 A <.54 A <.54 A <.64 < • v/c ratio is less then 0.54. (1] See table 2 for level of service explanation. 121 • Capacity of left turn is exceeded and an additional turn lane is needed but cannot be provided. 131 • Initial study intersection. _7_ 4 YF Ff. SABLI 2 LIVIL Of INIVICI Ill IBM: 'NIOUT Parity ewal; slow Mauch lard. SFecl.l Merl M. 17. Wshl&$tr. I.C., 1115. 'tllkay Comity Mast' Spacl11 latest 209, Trauo►rtatlr Amuck laud, 9lablaotr. I.C.. Must. ISIS. Avenw %hicle Values to Level of Delay capacity Lail! bISCielSn (Sa &)_ talfe A Free Floe. As *waacl plane it filly 00.0-05 0.110-0.59 utilized by traffic ow &$ vablcle lilts Ira tkr &$e red isdlcetir. W11- elf5crt 6141e. 1 Stable swell". M occoslrel uwvacl 05.1.15 0.68-0.69 AM 11 folly utilised. _try delvers s&$fe to fail "ambut restricted udtkb platers of vehicle. Wlwl delays. C stable small". Mier a wwi abuse 15.1 -23 0.70-0.79 uay Dens fella otillad. Dust *Iwss fail swaket restricted. Acceptable delays. 1 Aopretli&$ suitable. fivers say 0ee 29.1.10 0.80-0.19 I# alt Wedere flow we red slq al Wlcatlr, sums develop bit dissipate rapidlr, ultleot escecslve delays. I: Quotable smruti&$. false" at r am 60.1 -61 0.9J-0.99 county. shicles w suit tMrlil ufrul tltal cycle. 11M open fees opltrer If" hwouctlr. 511slflcrt delays. F Frced Flea. see is )owed crditial. 60.1 of sot Fltrtetie swat" WON capacity rick treater applicable 109 slurs. safes &$y black *firm&$ latersectirs. FSClnlve delays. IBM: 'NIOUT Parity ewal; slow Mauch lard. SFecl.l Merl M. 17. Wshl&$tr. I.C., 1115. 'tllkay Comity Mast' Spacl11 latest 209, Trauo►rtatlr Amuck laud, 9lablaotr. I.C.. Must. ISIS. II. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REFORT DATE: May 28, 1986 TO: Chill and peebers FROM: of the Planning Comfsslon Of Buller, City Planner BY: Lfse Minfnger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYIROIMEMTAL AiSSESST AM rpues t N t1AL PLAN AMNDWitT 86.02A a g r u /a) to w Ne rh Median Density Restdmtfal (4-8 acres of land, located a rhaieno for approxlnately five Line and Etiwanda - APM: 227.111- 24rthhwwast corner of ease . and 26. ERYIRO.MOTAL ASSESSMENT _ AND ETZM&VK SPECIFIC PLAN 4aftes IL r c an ran S routes to aenrr O"sity Residentfl) to Service) and LM ow Corne-cfai) for 9.4 (Community corner of Base Line and of land located at (Neighborhood 25. and 26, +nd Etlwanda . APM: 22j 1 .10. 24, 111 -10, 24, ABSTRACT: the General Plan Asenyamt and EtlwaMa Specific Plan AZT Res l/ are reVuestad Medfw acre site located to to 981ghborhLood Comwrctal forDeNns9 4 Ettwenda Avenue. The northwest corner of Base I iM to develw a nefghporhoodshca^t has stated that it is his intent Public input, tthhee Co+elsstar°�i irg cmttr. At this naetin envfrormeantal analys1s will yaw'il detanlna 1f any addletonal after ra9ardfng the eeenseent. e4ufnd or nake a y additional s. " wan a 5 e +Pplleant has requested a General Plan located on the northwestpec'fic Plan Mmdrmt for a 9.4 the current General Plan Mr of Base Line and Etiwandm�reLybte Mediae s1U der theenti it approximately �e ham t dera MeigAborhood Conseercial. designated Cosnunfty Services writhe Plan (ESP), the site Is Exhihtts �A"Ir designated as Low Medium Density g11 ilotti j (sN and a ). A r/o t� J ,AJ 40 f 1 I Jim QWG _rte wr —.—�_� n•� _— y v I ti'nr ,• S �Gv'Ea _L i?i -::Pn' •.d�;� +' ,��.tr.K.i.. ^3;�ti�, ri� II ,��:. :z- I ,AJ 40 f 1 I Jim QWG _rte wr —.—�_� n•� _— y v I ti'nr ,• S �Gv'Ea _L i?i -::Pn' •.d�;� +' ,��.tr.K.i.. ^3;�ti�, ri� II ,��:. :z- { t PLANNING COMMIS. JN STAFF REPORT ' GFA 86-02A and ESPA 86-01 MAY 28, 1986 Page 2 The Community Services designation in the Etiwanda Plan was created to provide opportunities for lietd or specialized low impact commercial and quasi - commercial services in a residential setting, with commercial development not to exceed 40,000 square feet. Site development requires a Conditional Use Permit and ' master plan, with conditionally approved uses listed as community uses (schools, parks, churches, etc.), Low. Medium Density Residential and limited Commercial. The request under consideration is for: 1. M amendment of the Generai Plan to expand the Neighborhood Commercial designation to the entire site; and 2. M amendment of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to eliminate the Community Services and Lou Kedium designation and designate the entire site as Neighborhood Commercial. Iii. GENERAL PLAN /ET.IIIANGA_SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: In order to evaluate this application, it is necessary to consider the background of the project site, the Etiwanda Specific Plan adoption process, and consistency with the policies of the ESP and General Plan. A. Backroundd: Prior to the adoption of the Ettuanda Specific Plan In 1963, numerous hearings were held to receive public Input on the content of the plan. The Etiwanda Specific Plan was developed to provide more detailed and site specific guidelines for future development of Etiwanda with the goal of preserving the character of the area, white requiring new development to incorporate the architectural character consistent with the community. The Specific Plan provides detailed implementation measures to order to carry the goals and policies of the Ganeral Plan. The project site was identified through the public hearing process as particularly sensitive from a planning perspective due to its location on Etlwanda Avenue. The Community Service designation was conceived for this site in order to provide a means for site specific controls. The property owner (who is also the applicant for this project) initiatd the original proposal. His stated intent at the time the Etiwanda Specific Plan was prepared was to develop a small commercial project, possibly with a specialty market and other limited office /commercial space. The re ainirg portion of the site, 1 11 AY 5 'e PLANNING COMMIS. JN STAFF REPORT GPA e642A and ESPA 86 -01 May 28, 1986 Page 3 91 would be developed with Low Medium density residential. The design of this mixed usa project was to reinforce the character of Etiwanda by: a Providing a community focal point b) Reinforcing a sense of community, C ) Rei:iforcing Etiwanda's heritage. The designation of Community Services was approved by the Planning Commission with this express Intent and with very specific limitations on the scope of permitted commercial uses. As a practical result of the ESP process, the General Plan was mended prior to final adoption of the ESP. Since no Community Services land uss district existed in the General Plan, the closest designations were deemed to be the Low - Medium Residential and NC districts. However, since It is the specific plan which is the Implementation vehicle for sits development, the stringent Community Service district requirments should receive extensive review in this process. The applicant has requested a General Plan Amerdment ono Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment in order to develop the entire 9.4 acre site as a shopping center of approximately 94,000 square feet, Incorporating a supermarket, drug store, tenant spaces, and free standing office, fast food and gas station structures (see Exhibit •C°, Site Plan. The applicant has submitted a letter of justification (attached, Exhibit 000), stating that the existing Low Medium Density .residential designation is less acceptable to area residents than a change from Community Service to Neighborhood Commercial.- Staff has not as yet received any comments from the Etiwanda community regarding this issue. B. Land Use Compatibility: Tha`pioject is bounded en the north arm westt y t-6 he 4iciorla Planned Comunity. The areas adjacent to the site are designated as Low Density Residential. Across Etiwanda Avenue to the east and south across Base Line Road, the designation under the Etiwanda Specific Plan is Low Medium Density Residential. The CSP and General Plan state that the City should encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible, land uses adjacent uses. While the proposed commercial use would not create severe incompatibilities with adjacent single - family ■ t PLANNING MW. lsSIOh .rAFF REPORT GPA 86 -02A and ESPA 86 -01 ' may 28, 1986 Page 0 residential undoubtedly the fapact of the expanded commercial area would undoubtedly be more sllgnfficant than With the be tf ^ruaiotM ^Vletorfa Devetopmentcbyl Center would Nedlrw Density residences. The Intensity, of the Proposed land use 1s less Compatible with adjacent uses than rO existing destgnation. C• Consistent with Ad led Goalz and Ob eetives: The Etlwarda ec c an o ect ves or cc,mserc a ere opment can be associated traffic atraf i�f�>rLwcu prevent cammrctal activity and Particularly In the core areeaction�g Ett� ^� � and Victoria VeaUe residents Providing necessary coaerctal opportunities to established as a Ceau^itY Services District was residential district which also allows limited or specialized low tercial services. Neighborhood Canercial is pact coeaae dofined as "Provided to greet tM retail and service needs of a 1 total leasable area from 30, c uster of nelghbonc�ods, with Dian rates that from Coommlercja Square diersf should d SautM CO closer than one mile tram one another and shout, not encourage vehicular traffic in establlshtd resldentla' areas or on Ettwanda Avenue. The nearest nresldtrhoa comsercial designation to the project site a boated approximately one- quarter mile west on Base Line Road to tM Victoria Planned Coemuntty. Approval of this request would allow two comparable commercial centers within a quarter mile of each other. 1&t &S to collownity identity. meet —­-,�vriszics or the cultural/histori al site has been designated as oncerns due to its critical Development of any project !sign treatments of a scale community. The applicant Plan and er_vations of the apps *s to a e c IV. PLANNING cOM CPA 86 28, 1986 IS M STAFF REPORT MAY -029 and ESPA 86.01 Page 5 0. conclusions: The pr osed Change represents of n cant deparWre from the lexist ng land use designation consistencity Services, to tern of land use coose deal and Plan, Y with goals and objectives of the ESP and the follaeig+ner +l, the application appears to O'Mral ng reasons: Wroprfate for 1 The So land use revs not seat the intent of the Of commercial uses and ga "g limitations on the type Avenue, and particularly a' trcffic on Y. of zhe project site. Etiwanda 2, The Proposed neighborhood commercial center will designated too close r. a neighborhood center already to as one quarter mite vast lOflthe prdovtctoria Community Plan 3• Land P ject site. uses mould be less compatible with adjacent Properties if the isnd use change were approved, since the dreater. intensity of the site Neuld be substantially greater. 6. The cancp Watlte Pl intent an and elevations do architectual and Etiwanda Specific Ply t •'meet the sole and PedestrfMsIl" elements. especially rela[fng ito Based on the pecificyplantons listed above, ilia Plan /Etiwanda S does not Provide a ad Aiee" t application as submitted er Etiwande Specific Plan aqua justification for amending the ENYIROMF.NTAL General Plan• ANALYSIS: The Initial Study Pr army by start i+ePeet. es Th w areas lanA °uzern for ppotential start circulation• tY are: and V�ianntn environmental factors; and a esthetics,rasodlscussed bei., safe °mslderattons; A. ty and nuisance d .. Ave PLANNING COMMIS. A STAFF REPORT GPA 86 -02A and ESPA 86.01 flay 28, 1986 - Page 6 B. Circulatlen: The site is located at the intersection of Base Line a-U-Ftiwands Avenue. The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposed land use change and stated that additional information will be required of the applicant to fully evaluate traffic impacts generated by the project. , C. Cultural Resources: . Development of the site as a 9 acre comeerccould impact cultural resources In two ways. A direct impact could be the disturbance or elimination of the rock curbs on Etiwanda Avenue. Indirectly, the project could impact the adjacent Chaffey -Garcia House and Etiwanda Congregational Church with additional traffic and noise. D. Health Safet and Nuisance Factors: Development of the site as a ne g or oo commarc—fTie� could create an Increase and potential noise levels and light and glare. E. Aesthetics: The portion of this project site along Etiwanda venuA a lies in the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District. The intent of this district 1s to protect and enhance the visual and historical cwrcter of Etiwanda Avenue. The proposed project could represent a conflict with the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Mail 1 Staff feels that additional information on the five area listed above soy fie necessary prior to final consideration of the General Plan Amendment. If the Coamtssion so desires, the applicant my be required to submit supplartal information such as traffic and noise studies in order to provide sore information on potential impacts and proposed attigation measures prior to further consideration of the amendments. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Comeuission, upon examination of the Gemral ri-an—Wendisent and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment, decide that the change from Low-Medium Density Residential and Co munity Services to Neighborhood Commercial would proante the land use goals and policies of the General Plan and Ettwanda Specific Plan and would not be materially detrimental to the adjacent properties, or would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings necessary on approval. A. The amendment does not conflict with the land use polictos of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan. and B. The amendment does promote goals of the land use element, and C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. - i SPA Bi- -% 29,1986 ° ESPA GJ _01 REPORr page 7 - Vt. rtWw POROEaCE: This It rVel em ee has D �tIft-t rs M ont nMeet ar t�nad eetIc s Me Public hearin rty Addition proposed? VII. RE °° sign has Dee; erected foot DYws arY of the t So vaa MDirt0lt: Based on site. foot supplemental eroa Ives oe the aDory .the Sped /te Plan aeer4emnt feithe analysis �C 1. General Pl oeetssio� has �Y the aaengaents with the Alternatives are: rands z' Ra7uest no further study. ry: focused eitthherfeent to suboft additional deteralned by tthe Cast 1N4act� of detailed 4"ylrortwrotal 3. Mprore �fWon at µasort v1a dies or4 issuance Of 4- ft"do"t ass meeting , to Stall RVative lkcls�ltted. This mould r the CoeA'asfe�etfon 1s for require the �t nd 4 Resolut the Genera vpuests tonightti - - Should Plan Aaen� O'u anus r ioa�endiha EtA w&ldaa s to the City Regattva Declaration er A�achpedfffc approval of�iflic Pan Respectfully and issuance of General Y suDeftted Brad Puller city Planner BB :ty :cv Attaclvaents: Exhibit • . Exhibit .� _ and Use Desf Exhibit aD. : S1te Plan 9nations initial Stud Letiq o} Justification Resolutf Y ' Part tt Resolutfon� rea °'sanding RPProvai Proval Resoluita e{c nding endin9 Dan1e1 1 Benfal 0 c ' �f i C 9 CITY OF rr��u -0 8� • c�z ,y RAND -D CUCAMONGA 7TrL.C, ftANNM DIVLS[gV 4�niurr,_Asc�u, .A 1119 i 4f 1 IV h fit A aaob.a M M —221 .. March 14, 1986 Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Ste. C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Attention: Planning Staff Gentlemen: I am writing this letter to ,justify the reasons for an amendment to the General Plan adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This :one change request is being made because of concerns that residents of the Etiwanda area have regarding our corner. Mr. 1024:s has contacted me about the apartments that we had stheduled to build on the property adjacent to Our shopping center corner At Etiwanda and Baseline. It is his feeling and those of the L—iramda rooldents that a larger commercial designation at that currier watuld be acceptable to the residents of the Etiwanda area providfa; no spertauong can be eliminated. The Etfwandt Group ins =eaartZ cOneerea. First, 1hay would like to be sure Met we have car %pecilic approval for the specific tdevelopme= :hat are are prspmslrig and we give them an op ortunity to comment amd WlrrOwe our proposed pry ect before the planning commission aapa0vM it. Secondly, the canter would 4est9lLtnCa19 conform to the requirements of the Etiwenda SPecrPlt pin in every way, Particularly with regard to its rural aspayrance. must ontana. 7heySwent the tenter to be successful so that it will remain clean and safe. If our cRffter is not ffirst:, they fear that Vfetmria or Fontana will steal our rttality. e E%HIRIT •0" e37aAgQaeAtpAVENUE QE lot rty CALIFORNIA :i Deve1OPrnent . Brokerage Property me a Ornnt Arehl:Oe:ure - EnginGeri ng ASO Planning Department Staff t March 14, 1986 Page 2 Fourth, they are expecting us to take reasonable steps, by lease Provisions or selectivity or ether accPetable means, to Fee that neither the center' nor any Part of it becomes a 'hang -out• for any wall lit, have The by repudaotherwise, be good citizens of the community. be Fifth, the center will be other wise committed to preserving the rural atmosphere u7 Etlwanda in all respects, including keeping the vast oaJorlty of ^traffic on Bascllne and Off Etiwands Avenue which is tO remain unchanged with its rock curbs and gutters restored. I believe that the concerns of the Etiwande Group are ,lustiffcation enough for the shopping center that t•.e would like to construct at the nerthwest corner of Etiwanda and Baseline, ye believe that if we meet the requirements of the Etiwanda Group, we }4' wilt have • very fine center and one that is tou built. Sincerely, KAKI CO AMY Y � Andrew Barmakian i President AB:sm , x+4:\ , r;-, r.:. — .t: .Z.r/ Tg ' •.'e • t^ . we-K V.J. t�^,ti AI•F.^�F `J %�,5 Aff. m: � tY RESOLUTION ND. 86-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CWANO N3A PLANNING COIMi5SI0M RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ETiNANOA SPECIFIC PLAN ANENDMEM N0. 86-01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DESIGNATION FROM ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AWNONENT C"WITY SERVICES TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 9.4 ACRES OF LAW LOCATED a THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIN )a AM BASE LINE ROAD - APN: 227- 111 -10, 24, 25, 26. accepted WHEREAS, On the Ist day p Pr0.oKf 1986, an application was filed and 1t; and duly advertised e ' 'O the each g of Nay, to I"G. S the flanning COMISSfon hold a Goverment Cede. p�altd hearing pursuant to SKtton 65864 of the California SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning COmafsaion cannot make the followingSECTIiOngs; I. That the subicct property IS suitable for tht uses Permitted in tie proposed district in terms of Kcess, size, and Compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the Proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General flan. NON. THEREFORE, BE IT RESDLYEO: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to MS of cm Comelssion of the City of Ranchothat Cucamongalhereby recomends denial on the 28th day of May, 1986, No. 86-01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recomends that the City Council deny He. 86-01. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the planning Comefssion shall be forwarded to the City Council. .2S3 S r; 'M Y'. APPROVED ANDD ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANK ISSION OtUTHE CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA r ' 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coaaaission of the City of d Rancho Cucamnga, do hamby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coesalssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at 4 regular nee -ing of the Planning C%nission held on the 28th day of May. 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CONNISSIONERS: REHPEL, NCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER " HOES: COMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STDJT T- RESOLUTION NO. 86-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-02A. WHEREAS, the Planning Caaission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86 -02A. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission cannot make the following n ngs: A. TM Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies Of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. Tim Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT REALVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cooission does hereby recommend denial of General Plan Amendment Mo..86-O2A to the City Council. ADOPTED THIS 207H DAY OF MAY, 1966. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the follooing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May, 1986, by the following rote' -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER. REIPEL ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE p ;- ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT OATS: TO: F": or: SLJECT: I. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 2, 1996 "syor and "cabers of U* City council Brad duller, City Planner r� C G 8 hvn ' Lisa Mi11149er, Assistant Planner UVZ4Q WrAL ASSES ,mere ,� from 9u ao"ERAL ILAN acre to Neighbor a an ozA acres of land, I hood CoMMarcfaje ofq +Resi�ntiil f4-8 ENYIA and EtiMade - APN: 22) 1jt 2/ a °r"r tal five 69QM 4 Assaee,�..- _ and T6. lechne applicant _ K� t, Immunity° rvtc��s"t afr�ai Lo Plan Ame M nd eat , shopping caner prt develop a 94-000 brh00d Cose� ia"I at W detailed MMe dtn�f cr creation - corner a ai sioe ease Line and r od II. P 9 dental of this request. thfa iteo, The Crovides Mare LAiM119 COPMISSJON oeMMfasion is The W1th the &nera) iCTION. y Z8, 9B6 issues considore4 D ss on poliefe and land uses" and EtiWand, awin Y tile op4atfbility, Sawing consistency The planning C Shan99ee mould o�fssion deGnMtned that the traeffic Plan which abed tent With t goals Pro traffic generated b posed land case Proposed Y CC MMIrcfal Uses M octivt o the Etfvanda quarter of a Ofrhaod shoppin uses on old Base Lira Rad�fe tlh� yt to �➢hborhoodd center i0CAteed within yN Specific Plan Stat,s within one located no closer th,�one " Iftho"d = nity, on •f a of MIS] centerse Etignda one another. should be �b "TY Comm STAFF RE►d11 GF9 86-0ZA and ESfA 86 -01 _ Barsa:1M The Cowssfon also stated that the 114d � t�he�eslstfWatfblo withs�urroundi Ralghborhood than a to requests dntpnat d In Concllusio t�faa Resin ial /Ca�nftl Etiwanda �t1 to Plan and 1� ae�rdpa tur lreeistM Intent of the III. RE Plan. TI iM planning Cowlsslon rec theerft chant and Etlranda AW ffc Alan oanial y Council Concurs °�^ds dental of the would be rs"frod. adoption of the attached Reessoluut�fcn of Re ctfully 1t If L Brad Buller City planner 88:IAy;dak Attacheents: Pla" CMAISSISIO" Staff Reyort of NU' 2e 1"6 Resolutfon of oanfal of EtLwandaplan Aaand:Mc SPaclfle Plan Awdeant w .2 r6 , 1 4 � r V, RESOLUTION NO. $01'039 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA. DENYING REQUESTING AN ;MOMENT THE LAM USE EbGi OF THE RANCHO CUCM0WA GENERAL FLAN FOR 9.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED 01,THE NORIN EST CORNER OF RAS INE WM AND ETiVANDA AVENUE. Hwtarf WHEREAS. the Plannlng Cae•isfion held i duly advertised .public n9 on My 26. Im-to-consider all coasts an the Prapeaed Generic Plan Amendment No. K-OZA; aed _ WXKAS, the MY Council held a MY advertised public hearing to consider all coewnts an the proposed General Plan Amndmnt No. 8&02A; SECTION 1• The Rancho Cucamm" City Council cannot mks the following TTn�inor. A. The Amendment does not confltw with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. N. The Amndmt promotes goals of the Lend Use Elamnt. C. The Amodlrnt would not be mttrfallY incurious or detrtmntal to the adjacent properties. MOW. THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby denies General Plan Aamndmnt No. 96 -02A. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st dey of January, 1907. aA sT r C� vr�r�y. � •'r YrSly i. F ■iv I :; RESoI.UTIoii No. 97-63V 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C%KIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIr". CALLIFOHHIA, UNYING ETINAMA SPECIFIC PLAN AIEI M N0. * -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC, PLAN NEIGIiORHOOO COMMERCIAL TFOR 9.4 ACRES SOOF ILAID LLOOCAITED ON T!K WORTIRES1 CORNER OF PASE LINE AID ETIMM. aces filed and aacccepteed on the abovio- described 1986, an application WHEREAS. on ttie 28th project; 9@6 and Comissian held a duly advertised of hearin pu uamino Section 658% of the G:1forMa Govfrmmt Code; pursuant to NEREAZ the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all caataents on the proposed Etivanda Specific Plan Amdaent No. 86_ 0% SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council c3nm. t make the following TTn n3i-gr 1. That the subject property 1s suitable for the uses peroftted in the proposed district in tents of access, size, and capatibili with existing rind use in the surromding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant imoact on the anvirommit nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conforwaoce with the Genaral Plan. NOW, TKAEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Sertion 65850 to 65855 of the Calfernia Government Code, that the City Council of the City of P.ancho Cue a hereby denfas an the Ettwanda Specific Plan Ame &, No. 86-01 on the 21st dru of January, 1987. .y •i 4r WY �ryY }�L L^J 1.`Y,�•�.i�.�t';GV�115+i f._YU' _ _ _ -- t J� i STATE OF C4LDO AfflDAvor pp ill RNJ; Pp CATIQp - -= COUNrVOPSAWBERIVARDINO as p 1. Naurine D _ th Pagan ,,, <n.A�wy e "Paper of gendyertlsing clerk of . do he y4� Cauntyand StateyREPORTYthatl erla esal . don Dub D cerUt aforesa,; and that y a In Lye Cit�y}' of a clan •� Yom~ of RaLlef of PeD:fe d fO of ontnent wYw•rF,a+i'4<.,i w�.. t City Cou RearinY City of Rancho •n. m°o ~•JA.F. CUC7Oonaa WWSPuhllshedY+.<w in seld Per One anvn'c"w:�;�'^w.err •11 time nc�+w •�' ��F yrMM Ito Wit: FT January 9. 1987 ,FAFCR ���Fp 4�4 roc�Y under Penalty t MIM,Y•YI y YWYi•y1•ALJ1.�y- t the foregoing ta t an d Nor Dated ywa .. Yy�N ,lam :,�,*•�..�.~, �+ Dated at Ontarlo. Callfo fS/ ••uy thiy �th gnat .pr.F�j y�F 4U ' �Y d3y Of A,,,Ar4Y.. y i s SO? ORDINANCE NO. e AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CRRATNG AN ADVISORY COMMISSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION The City Council of the City of Rancho Cuwonga, California, does orlain as follms: SECTION 1: Repealing of Ordinance 294. SECTION 2: There is and shall remain in the city goverment an Advisory Commission. •. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission shall act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and Planning Commission on community issues and other such Advisory matters as may be delegated. The purpose of the Advisory Cevission is to enhance communication between citizens and the City Council, increase involvement of the community in decision making and advance citizen issues. The Advisory Commission is encouraged to adopt a formal procedure for camnity interaction. Advisory Commission Membership SECTION 4: The Advisory Commission @ball consist of a total of nine (9) ambers mith one (1) appointed from each of the three (3) geographic areas, designated by zip code in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, namely Alta Loma (91701), Cucasougs (91730), and Etivanda (91739), and six (6) appointed ac large. Membrrs of the Advisory Commission @ball be residents of Rancho Cucamonga ant shall be appointed by the City Council. A subcommittee of the City Council stall submit to the City Council the name of any pe:404 proposed for appointment to tae Advisory Commission and upon such appointment by the City Council, the name of the appointee shall be recorded in the minutes of the City Council meeting. SECTION 5: The nine (9) members of the Advisory Commission shall each serve two (2) year terns. Either five (5) or four (4) ambers of the Advisory Commission shall be considered annually by the City Council as set forth below. In the year which five (5) Advisory Commission umbers are considered, then the three (3) umbers designated from the geographic areas shall be considered along with two (2) at large ambers. In the converse year, the four (4) ambers shall be at large appointments. In any case, a amber &ball continue in office until his /her respective successor is appointed an set forth below unless sooner removed as provided in this Ordinance. If a vacancy shall occur6 other than by expiration of the term of office, it shall be filled by appointment of the City Council for the rmaiader of the unexpired term. All regularly expiring terms shall teeminate on December thirty —first of each year. .260 Removal of Members SECTION d: Nembers of the Advisory Commission way be removed at any regularly scheduled City Council meeting, upon three (3) working days' prior written =ties to the amber. Removal shall be by majority vote of the entire ` City Council. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the expressions t of Advisory Commission ambers save and except the guidelines established by the Advisory Commission. Rerular Neetiaxs SECTION 7i Regular meetings of the Advisory Commission shall be L established by Resolution of the Advisory Commission. Officer! SECTION 8: The Advisory Commission @ball select a chairperson to preside at all meetings of the Advisory Commission, and a vice- cbairpersoo to preside in the absence of the chairperson. Joint Subcommittee Neetioto Y SECTION 9: City Council Subcommittee and Advisory Commission Subcommittee (,hair and vice cbair) joint meetings shall be bald quarterly on k the first Tuesday of each "lender quarter which is not a legal holiday. In the event this is a holiday, the meeting will take place on the next regular working day. Special meetings nay be called as needed by either subcommittee. fi 4• The joint quarterly subcommittee meetings shall be for the purpose of establishing an Advisory Commission work program and review of matters studied by the Advisory Commission. SECTION 10: The Mayor shall situ this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its pange at least once in The Daily Report, a cewapaper of general circulation published ' in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1987. a V' cone. xi \k q C� 1A4 HY : ... .. •, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA sr STAFF REPORT o a n DATE: January 15, 1987 y t TO: City Manager Ism City Council Members o FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manger c SUBJECT: ISSUING NON - EXCLUSIVE COMMERICIAL AND INDUSTRIAL 3, REFUSE COLLECTION PERMIT: APPLICANT ROSTA HAULING RECOMMENDATION The City Coumll review the Staff Report ad = onsider all input relative •o issuing a non- exeluslve commercial and Industrial refuse collection permit - to Rosta Hauli':g. Background As the City Council may recall In June 1986, Chapter 8.18 was added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code which established criteria for the City to Iss•x permits for commerical and Industrial refuse collection services. This Lhapter of 1M Municipal Code set the framework to ensure all refuse collection would be conducted In a safe, sanitary, and orderly manner. The necessity for such an additim to the Municipal Code was twofold. _ First, Rancho Cucamonga was operating wrier the County Code approved in 1974 and adopted by reference by the City In 1978. Since then, the County has revised the Code to meet current Industry standards for the collection and disposal of refuse. Second, the County Code was developed ' to meet the wide variety of refuse collection and disposal needs within the entire county, taking into ecccunt the terrain and climate difference throughout the area. Rancho Cuconorgo's Ordinance was developed to address the specific needs and requirements of our community. a V' cone. xi \k q C� 1A4 i In July 1986, the City Council issued three non- exclusive commerical and and Western Waste. collection pion Its M Yukon Disposal, Rancho Disposal, obtain o permit. They have subrrn(ttedt mho t laf the nesstarted the process to twoIted to complete the cppllcatfon procedure except for following two ited t a• General Liability insurance - $5 million, each ocaurance( $10 million umbrella Rosto Hauling has a $1 million s y and fxc submitted to the City o letter from "an insurance polic ogency stating, that when the City offers them a txrmFf, they will Provide the additional $9 million In coverage, far a premium of $27,000 arvxually. (See attached) b, Performance 9ard of $100,000 Rosto hiaullr9r has ro type performance bond in effect at this time, however they hove submitted a letter from an Insurance underwriting Information � and Process of securing the necessary also will be obtained if the City o to Issue the bond. This permit. (See attached) In the case of the three nan"xcluslve commerical and industrlol refuse collec cttio Permits Issued in July 1986, each of the companies had all of the Insu and issuing the bonding requirements fuffllled when the Council considered n51 permits. Respectfully Submitted, Maier Amist RAR:shs s au 'aY'.i .7 G3 N I .i .Y N,Yp . yi•t�tyiY1� 1 r�J�s rSr< 71�STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4' COUNTYOFSANBERNARDIfrO ss 1, Hour!" D. Pagan am the Legal Adv do hereby certify that I newspaper of en circulation, clerk of THE DAILY REPORT, a daily County and State aforesaid W Published in the City of Ontario, VW that the attached advertisement of Notice of Public Nearing City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga waa Published in said newspaper one (1) tiro s r to wit. Jonuory 9. 1907 a' I certify under penalty of periury that the foregoing Is J correct, B B true and (8191 ure) Dated at Ontario, California this 91th day of r January 19 87 C' 1 l ,�s:Si:ni P.'�:F.i�iYh'S;F� •a�'ii+r 1t� }�f{? .J_ R�i� 4M M" .x s 4 ° Rosta Hauling P.O. BOX 922 Upland, Ca. 91785 (714) 981 -5041 0., BOX8807ho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 wov. 13, 1986 Attention Mr, Lauren Wasserman - City .yanAyac honorable Mayor and members of the City Council, refs (e to neek an agreement and no E'Jr tea .011ectioc and disposal of ceEuse Within n-aXCL�4sive permit the City of Rancho CucOmMercial and industrial a Jeneing athetnereh located at, 14122 Ouandn Ave . Ponta., !e eerv(r. P (husband, are;, since 1977.baen As P rovidedocefuee ?collection Rands Hauling, 1 h4va also surrounding commues for thedieposal In the -it. daldy area during Gh013ddt twentyvt cae Peaty, •Ind ,cal t ave F four yeaee. i „Ear �'[atn 44(ch,4ts fol voed Foele1j the owing cafusa re..,lr toll collection permiLpPlication of a "Attacheunte• 1) Insurance J) Parformanci 'l ,nd ) Truck tilt 4) County of San 3ern4rdino PQroit inEon "it� on* hpleaney lluestione or need additional contract as at (714) 98 5041. 5041. 3Acerely, ✓� C. NOS'CA HAULIr•73 t4 ` - , m Rosta Hauling P 0. Box 922 Upland, Ca. 91785 (714) 981 -5041 Ar Cd.4C f r i 1) 1NSURA.9CC J.P. Jaeinsti Co. 554 a. Foothill Blvd. 4uite 119 Son OLAM, C4. 91773 (714) 599 -1293 $1,000,000 Liability lay A. '44in 4 Cown4ny ?a41 '149ncta3 Ave. SL Segundo, Ca. 90245 (213) 322 -6LLO $9,000,000 Liability (pending) •3ay 4 1 "L9 will n4ccy all coverage ae of April 1987. T( • ' eG i S Y•'yTL t �V .K c�'�.�r .�:.: 1:.+'.+� - .•r-.".'•'.ir d?_ �f� _. _.. _...�._s:o:.(fi;:a"t),• �'l' .= a F 89 pan "`uY December S A '13y r' t� ' 1906 Ros to Upland, 80 f 22 °) Ca 917OS Re: [fmltlla Ins 0 $9,0p0 000 n e ea r flfzabet . Th AS Ne YOy for h dtsc If mIt$ ambrella ones °= us to Sa feco wljl b e5la cY hfn telepd °op sery When Po11Cy ytiier and an0�a)a°'oun'tWe ahs to your contrthe Cf Ch 0Pfeabove Prem! ef$5 abl00o comer verfftct. gI� of Ran rs $1,03 econdm of $2i0, 0 Off Y- th Is Pleas f °r You, f fnsura cl Mlth °79a0 fp0 f °'11m1ts. stingls p e f e, the erS ease sery cea to Bfv and We det f lsjof th cf Y Vary Truly yours to you' a us a calf 1p Mefmredlately process W1b%�_ . 6e °pral Nan 9 °erster� iii I WAR /bvf can be of any 7 JAS ;NBjp nc•. ry. $54 F. CO., 1*-- F�T11IL� ifY COMPANY 530 t " (8188)81{ 9 SAe ECO /7 _"1.14)SWI29. aN EIIKtII f .uY1 art° V..UAO. ROSTA in E.ppaa 1i OI TAra dr.Ter a r m ❑ Nwn12 /7 19 86 to .ID DEnr P. AAULING CCI Ox bplrY•° agMO CoregOr n OescopOw.I °0 D011h a the aan.e name° OROSTA BOX 92 UPLAND• CA 91785 83 INT at IV �— 72 ERNATZONAL r0°ahY — 66 HC Tm..na= a 75 WHITE =P"IY IU �� CwM•oarpvlie'corma P 4nRPl ln•manar 0.0 E P w• Y Tma. /lnsuranc, A Sc"ow" "'m tl t °r0°ilsupprraNwa CQTWrne" FOrm L a'roauc"'C.m 00Y.r890I0'arms umlq or Ll•oultY — Y _ Otrtar- Contractual °late. Oorrau na aw", lrtryry s °CA OaunMer Apprppr NO° PaaPQC'tY Oebw) - r S S °m.ertYO•m• °•'ac -u in Y trn f ti S 6POay Inlury SOe S q j � •nm.y i .odr.i� C 4 PI..FIY Oamaga f -_� li r-� CgmOmp F5 j- Is `0 a�`piLfwp�n ♦�1j10tea a S �N °p ON AUT PROP DEDUCTIB °rra.nal m)u.Y S ERT, s 100 9 vm ca °ary na 0 ON 93 � Umlh •tnui D Yln)uryl &uP r or 11 Y ERNATIONgL BomYIn)ury IEacn Ac-mrnn ' E �- A. caa�apKnal = �� Om r YI . specilp p2 RE i f °iwhtY Oama; ° ._ THEE T WITH $SOO ED 4OPKEPS COUP r ENSATION _ ECIAL Sblutory pN 83 Sway m)u S Pr °tarty 0sm `ONO ?ION Ge um°a ;a Comomeo S/OTNEp COYERAOES °acilY atpn Oelo+rl S 1000000 EuPLOYEPS LrABllify f r19uo•-0•tssw u wr+- �INTERNATIONALIONAL ID i�24TD32259 aweo .��M!1.R1NA DEL 9REY� CAD9029994R4EgI CORp;.,.._" W"x� _� �/ V x 1 -M1 i AS f c ' Rostn 8eullnq 0.0. Sot 922 ;a ;'0Laa9, Ca. 91785 (714) 981 -5041 ti r• A'CPACH,L• +QC3 2) PBRPORB.IHCB soso Am+est Buret y Insurance Co. a P.O. Box 1767 Colton, Ca. 92324 -0891 �. (714) 370 -2240 4 :,• 5100,000 Performance Bond yr e`Y J } t, 1 k n ZIP AA Iff .'f�j } ✓: s` t {iY� a; pZ �i 9�,� rw�'�yfy,,7. S 3r� a � �pVts •1S b RJ ST yJ� %p3,yc 8 >1 P' } . CITI CP RAN= CCCANomaA RB: A"m EAULM 3. TO WKN IT XAT coo=: WE ARE IN RE^ ` O) AN ABPLIM= n= RO@L1 RAUL= XW PA BMW nWIM BI TNN C= Or RAMMO COCAMONOA, IN M AIW72�Ot $100 � .000.00. i a WE ARE n 'IHY PROMS 01 SxMK G M KUE& R2 GMp I]�g- MATION AN LL D COATE3ML TO TW= Ws ROM . ONCE OUR &Z"n ROO OF MXRWUTM RAVE HNNN -MNT AND MM IS II FLOE VE i90p118 mrr�r��r ° oc , iiILL 8[ II TBZ FOBITLOi TO 7B9GE ffi BORB. GINCER=. ,z YJU+�.Co �.� MICHAQI AN'38WI v BRANCH MANAGER + S%f pai S� r� Rosta Hauling p 0. Box 922 upland, Ca. 91785 (714) 981 -5041 3) Truck list ATTACHMNTS 1 1983 International Roll -off I.D. # 24TO11259ECB10340 1 1978 GMC Roll -off I.O. # 'rCE6anS71568 1 1966 GMC Roll -off I.O. # T.4770OA018296 1 1975 4hlte ?r:)ntloader Trick I.D. # 1AGPCVr834867 I +.. �l i jai • � I xnv,�}[� j =.'4c.. • 9 .y�r�y�•Cy itua r � j�j <a^.�rf� , y�y.Z �%� tY`]:AI11i41Y3.�.:'�t`! %w�'• YY'.°4iJ� 1'V..y.'• �.'• -r e� J .y S' `3 n F" f � •`i i• v Aosta Hauling P.O. Box 922 Upland, Ca. 91785 (714) 981 -5041 n a �C A:TACHmS:SPS 4) County of San 3ern4rdtno Permit # 8605310027 N AGREEMENT AND NUN - EXCLUSIVE PERMIT FOR THE COLLECTION AND D CC „sIF &OMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REFUSE WITHIN THE CITY OF LI RANCHO THIS AGREEMENT AND PERMIT 1s made and entered into as of the Twenty First corporation (hereinafteer referred to as Rancho Haauling, t municipal (hereinafter referred to as 'Penittee'). NITNESSETH in consideration of their covenants, and the tens and conditl¢ns hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. PermltteeabyiOccupants oconsideration the arse hereinafter described,�aandrunder peral(ty of the bonds conditioned as set forth to the Specifications (Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and by this reference made a pp+art hereof) hereby agrees to Mon all the work set forth and described in and In the manner prescribed in the Specifications. 2. The partial hereto understand and agree that this written Agreement, the aforesaid Specificapptaiions, each and every provision of Chapter 8.18 of the Rancho OthhergCitynOrd(nanC**,, as nd resollutions as 54114 sane hereafter amended hereafter amended, and Permittee's performance bond shall constitute a contract bone” the parties. Should it be ascertained that any Inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents other than City ordinances and this written Agreement, the provisions of this written Agreement shall control. 3. Any word or phrase used herein defined in Chapter 8.18 of City's Code shall be construed in accordance with that definition. 4. So long as this Permit and Agreement remains in effect, Permlttee shall have the non - exclusive right and privilege to Collect commercial and Industrial refuse as stated in Section 8.18.230 of City's Municipal Code. S. Neither the acceptance by City or its representatives of the payment or money, nor any payment for, or acceptance of, the whole or any part of the work by City or its representatives, shall operate as a waiver of any portion of this Agreement or of any power herein reserved to City or any damages herein provided; neither shall any waiver of any breach of this Agreement be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. 6. Penittee shall keep itself filly Wormed of existing and future state and federal laws, rules and regulations and City ordinances, regulations, rules and orders 11 any manner affecting 'those engaged and employed in that works and rkof oallaporde s oreldecreesnof any aofeofficiaals having jurisdiction or au.norlty over the same, and shall, at all times, observe and comply with and cause any and all persons employed by Penittee or under Persittee to observe and comply with all such laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders and decrees. Instsv — -1- _,._. ;t -12.2 coini ocedmon Janauary 21�, Vk? and shilf c01i4Mi njo; iris' in lave 21e 1993 provided that said tern shall automatically be extended for successive six year periods unless either party hereto serves a Notice of Nonrenewal on the other party at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the term, hereof or of any six (6) year extension of that ten. 8. Permittee shall receive from proprietors of commercial and industrial establishments as full CNWIation fcr the performance of this ,Agreement, the rates specified in Exhibit 48,' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and as the same are adjusted from Limn to time by resolution Of the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 8.18 of City's Municipal Code. 9. In the event that circumstances beyond the control of Permlttee impose or generate increased costs in the performance of this Agreement. Permittee may apply to City Council 1n accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 8.18 of gmicipal Code to determine if an adjustment in compensation Is warranted to avoid undue financial hardship on Permittee, and material impairment of ►ermlttee's ability to provide the level and quality of service herein specified. Permlttee agrees to furnish all such accounts and records as are needed In the ,judgment of City Council to substantiate ary requests for Increased rates to customers. The dectston of City Council shall be final. 10. permitted understands and agrees that it shall keep full and complete books, records and accounts of all financial transactions with respect to this Agreement. Such books, records and accounts shall be maintained in accordance with accepted accounting principles and shall be maintained in such fashion so as to provide a detailed financial analysis with respect to Permittee's opera- tions hereunder. All such books, records and accounts shall be maintained for J minima of five (5) years from and after the end of the fiscal year in which any such books, rarords and accounts are created. Parmittee understands and agrees that City, by and through Its designated representatives, may inspect any such books, records and accounts during Perntttee's normal business hours at Permittee's offices and, further, that City, at its cost, and in its sole discretion, may cause an audit of any books, records and /or accounts main- tained or prepared by Permfttes pursuant to this Agreement. Permittee further agrees to provide City copies of any such books, records and /or accounts or Permit the copying thereof by City. Tie parties agree that Parmittee is not required to maintain an accounting system or books, records or accounts for its operations hereunder separate and apart from its other operations. 11. All complaints regarding service by Perwittee, whether received by Permfttee or City, shall be resolved in accordance with the Specifications. 12. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is violated by Permittee, City W. at its election, terminate the Agreement or take over and complete the Agreement for Permittee by serving written notice upon Permittee of its intention to terminate or complete such Agreement, and unless, within therAgre3eement, upon the exot such shall aceaseaand terminate or City shall take over its completion, as stated in said notice. YS n In t. e� ��Y As to violations of the provisions_of this Agreement which cannot be remedied or corrected within,thlrty (30) days, said Agreement at election of City, shall cease and tared net* Or CitY shalt take over ES completion upon .the giving of written notice.- If Parmittee should be adjudge, bankrupt or should make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors or a receiver should be appointed on the account of insolvency of Permitte, or if. Permittee should persistently and repeatedly refuse or should fail to supply enough properly skilled workers or proper materials or equipment for the collection and disposal of refuse from City, as herein provided, in a good and workmanlike manner, or fail to make prompt payment for materials, equipment or labor or persistently disregard laws,- ordinances, or the instructions of City or its duly authorized representatives, ^or otherwlse,be in substantial violation of any provision of the Agreement documents, then City may, without prejudice to any other right or remedy, and after giving Parmittee written notice, terminate or take over completion of said Agreement. r• i It is understood aM agree that, should Permittee fail to furnish labor, materials and equipment to do and perform all the work and labor provided for herein, in the manner,set forth, and in a good and workmanlike manner, Permittem shall, in addition to any other provisions presented in � Agreement documents, be liable to City for all losses or damages that latter may suffer on account thereof, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees. 13. Any notice required or permitted hereunder shall be made by depositing the sow in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, as follows or to such other address supplied by an* party to the other pursuant to this paragraph 13: Permittes: Rost& hauling P.O. Box 922 Upland, CA 91785 City: City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 14. Wherever in the Specifications the term •City Manager' appears, the sane shall be deemed to refer to the City Manager or his /her duly authori •d representative. 15. Wherever in this contract, including the Specifications, or any other document constituting a part hereof or furnished pursuant hareto, Permittee indemnifies City, such indemnification shall in all instances apply in favor of City's elected officials, officers, agents and employees and shall apply to all of said indemnities. Ini Ini -3- 16. It is understood and agreed that Fermittee shall make Al of the Vickups and perform 11 f the s rvice e 1 td f it under the provisions of this permit, contract an 8 franchise. I� S furt4r agreed that in return for such franchise, Penittee shall resit to Cityy quarterly a percentage of its gross revenues generated Mreunder. 17. This Agreement and the rights hereunder may not be assigned by the Penittee except with the express prior written consent of City, whether any such purported assigrwnt be voluntary or by operation of law. 18. Mnittee agrees to advise City in writing at the tin any negotiations are undertaken between Permlttee and its employees relating to wages and benffts and Permittee shall report the status of said negotiations from time to Lima including any pending strike, lock out, walk out, boycott or other labor dispute. 19. Full and complete financial data and Permittee's proposal for any rate increase shall be submitted to City at least sixty (60) days prior to the requested date of adjustment of any such rate. 20. Penittee shall, at Penittee's sole cost and expense, obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the ten of this Agreement full cagensation insurance for all persons who may be employed by Penittee in carrying out the work specified in the Agreement. Such compensation insurance shall be in accordance with the requirements of the State of California relating to workers' compensation. Permittee shall furnish to City a copy of the policy or certificate evidencing such policy. 21. Throughout the ten of this Agienot, at Permittee's sole cost and expense. Permit** shall keep or cause to be kept in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of City and Pmrittee, comprehensive broad fore general public liability insurance against clitas and liaibility for personal injury, death or property damage arising from Permittee's operations hereunder, with a combined single limit providing protection of at least Five Million Dollars (55,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person, or for any one accident or occurrence and for property damage and at least Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000.00) aggregate for bodily injury or death and for property damage. Such insurance shall be carried only in companies licensed to do business in the State of policies shall contain language, to tin extent obtain& (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation ag City's elected officials, officers, employees. agent! (2) the policy^s are primary and noncontributing with be carried by City, and (3) they cannot be cancellec except upon forty -five (45) days' prior written notice in the event of any such cancellation or material ch insurance, then this Agreement shall terminate and be effect. Permittes agrees to furnish City copies of all upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing thm further agrees that all such policies shall name City, officers, agents and amployees as additional insureds, for its own account insurance not required under this A Init. 9< Ini -4- .2'7( , and representatives, any insurance that may or materially changed by the Insurer to City. Inge in such policy of of no further force and such policies promptly insurance. Penitee its elected officials, Penittee may effect 22. PerEittee agrees that City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees shall,not_be answerable or accountable in any umer_for any loss or damage that- -my' occur during Penittee's Ope WOns under this Agreement, or for injury or darrage to any person or persons, either woviant teployees of PhNttee or its subcontractors or the public, or for damage t0 property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the or i�ry eto ofany perbr +errant. property, resultiinnggb f responsible s ooperat�ions hereunder, except the sale nglip"a or wilfull misconduct of City, its elected officials, offices, agents and e+10yees, hvsrittes agrees that it will indemnify and hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents ad employees free and harmless from all claims, actions, dmegei,to, persons or property. Penalties, obligations, or liabilities that my be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of or in correction with perflttm,s e►erattons hereunder or the activities- of Penaittee, its agents, a +loyees, sub. contractors or invitees provided for herein whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City, but excluding such actions, claim, daneges to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or AMY] misconduct of City, its elected Officials, officers, agents and employees and in connection therewith, Peroittee agrees as follows: a. Permittee will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any said claim, damages, panaltiee obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees incurred in connection therewith; b. Permittee will promptly pay any judgment rendered against Pereittee or City covering such claim, damges, penalties, obligations and liabilities arising out of or in connection with this Agreement and Permittee agrees to save and hold City harmless therefrom; and c. In the event City, without fault, is mde a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Permittee for, damages or other claim arising out of or in cOmcectiOn with Permittm's operations hereunder, Pereittee agrees to pay to City any and all costs and expenses incurred by City in such action or proceeding together with City's reasonable attorney's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to oe executed as of the date set forth above. In Init. .2%% a APPROVED AS TO FOAM: CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONGA, A Municipal Corporation BY or Date: f ATTEST: city wark e. Rasta liguling a. /K7 6/President Date president EXHIBIT •A` SPECIFICATIONS I. DEFINITION OF TERMS For the purpcses of these Specifications any word or phrase used herein defined in Chapter 8.18 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code shall be construed in accordance with that definition. II. NOW TO BE DONE A. Work to be done under this Agreement shall include furnishing of all labor, meterial and equipment nocessary for, and the collection of, all refuse from industrial and commercial establishments within the non - exclusive service area of Pernittee according to these Specifications, and the disposal of such refuse in the nearest available dm or transfer station as directed by the City. B. Per*ittee shall collect refuse at least once per week from each commercial and industrial establishment which subscribes to that service. Food processing operations shall be serviced at least twice a weak. C. Pereitee shall render services at all tins in accordance with Chapter 8.18 of the City's Municipal Code and all ordinances of City as they now or my hereafter exist. D. Permittee shall not be required to collect refuse unless it has been placed in containers pursuant to said Chapter 8.18. E. Should Pernittee fail to collect and dispose of refuse set out or placed for collections, as herein provided, at tins required, after notification by City and reasonable tin, City may collect and dispose of same and Permittee shall be liable for the expense incurred, including City's reasonable overhead costs of 30%. III. STANDARDS FOR COLLECTIONS A. Permittee shall so conduct its operations so as to offer the least possible obstruction and inconvenience to public traffic or disruption to the peace or quiet of the area within which collections are effected. In accordance therewith, collections of refuse shall not be wade between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. D. Perwittee shall maintain all trucks and equipment used within City in good mechanical condition and the same shall be clean and uniformly painted and rvnbered. All trucks and equipment shall have painted thereon, or affixed theret,), in letters and numerals at least six (6) inches in height, the new and telephone number of Pereittee, which name and telephone shall be clearly visible at all times. Each vehicle utilized by Parmittee shall be P;. Init. in it 4- '_ � 99 identified by numerals at -least six (6) inches in height in a 1oC tion or locatfrs cat such veh to be s eeifled by City. A l�st sha+ing mac viol* a so L�ffad she1P1 be supplfed to City and maintained in a current posture. All trucks and *Quip- mant used in the performance of the Agreement shall be subject to inspection by City and, upon notice given by City, Pe mittae salt make the equipment available for inspection. If City finds that any truck or equipment being used by Permittee is not in sattsfactory condition then the truck or equipment r*qulring correction of defects shell not.bi. used by Persittee n the performance of the until corrected to the reasonable satisfaction All truck bodies used by Contractor shall be constructed in accordance with Section 8.17.220A of City's Mmicipal Code. Each piece of equipment used Sy Permittee shall carry at all times a brow and shovel to be used for the immediate removal of &My spilled material. C. Eight (8) hours of labor shell constitute a legal day's work for en all workm employed in the execution of this contract and Permittee and any subcontractors under Persitt** shall comply v^fth and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in the Labor Code of the State of Callfernia, as the seem may be amended from time to time. O. No container shall be placed to a public street or right -of -way by Permute!. E. All spilled material shall be Immediately removed by Permittm. • F. Permitue shall dispose of all collected refuse at permittee's expense, at an authorized point of deposit as directed by the City. G. Permittee shall supply Its employees with uniforms of a type approved by the City Manager. H. In the event of an epidemic, war, riot, insurrection or other natural or man -made disaster, Parmittee shall make available all of its employees, vehicles, equipment and facilities to City as required by the City Manager. V. COMPLAINT SERVICE A. Permittee shall maintain a telephone service with a local exchange area telephone number tar the purpose of handling complaints or emergency service calls. The said telephone service shall be operated between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of each day during which collections are made hereunder. (Section 8.18.240 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code). 3 I n I t. Ini •y B. Complaints received by Permittee shall be recorded in a log estaplished f that purpose and shall specify the date and tin of the coapla,"it and the substance thereof. The disposition of the complaint and the date of disposition shall be recorded and'a- " copy of said log shall be provided to City monthly. C. Permittae shall have available, during the hours while Permittn's telephone service is in operation, an emergency service vehicle to attend to cosplaints or emergency calls. 0. Permittee shall visit City offices at such tines as City_ shall " designate for the purpose of discussing any matters relating to, or any complaints which nay be involved with, the performance of the Agreement. Parmittee shall report back -as directed an any- action taken with reference to subject otter so discussed. Coordination of such check -in meetings to be arranged by City. E. Pendttee shall own or lease and maintain at its expense all equipment r necoiiar? to perform f 1 Its duties a; provided for under the g equipment for office to field equipment coaommcation. F. Every effort will be ode to provide a good quality of complaint service and follow -up in the community. VI. PERFCBIIANCE BOND Permittee shall, upon the execution of the Agreement, execute and file with City, a corporate surety bond in favor of City in the penal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), conditioned upon the faithful performance of said Agreement, which said bond shall be furnished and kept in full force and effect for the complete term of the Agreement. , VII. SUPERVISION A. performance of each of the provisions of the Agreement shall be under the direction of City Manager designated representatives or his designee and the work hereunder shall be done in a thorough and workmanlike manner under the direction, and to tho satisfaction, of the City Manager or his designee. B. The City Manager or designee shall have the right to review any and all advertising and notice regarding industrial and commercial refuse collection by the Pernittee prior to publication or distribution of such materials. The Permittee is not to publish or distribute any advertising and notice materials without the prior approval of the City Manager. Said prior approval shall be at least fifteen (15) days prior to proposed distribution. ` In1t. Init(7 -g- Init %5� In1t -30- • � �d1 VII:. PAYMENTS AND FRANCHISE FEES ; A. All commercial and ind' atrial accounts shall be directly billed by Permitted. B. The records of Permittee in this regard shall be available at reasonable times for the inspection of City. C. During the first one hundred sixth days of the ten of the Agreement (January 21, 1947 through June 30, 1987 inclusive) Permitt" shall pay to City an amount equal to five percent (5s1 �. of Penittde's gross revenues collected hereunder. During the ? - second and third years of the tam of the Agreement (July 1 1937 thro ugh June 30, M9. inclusive), Permitted shall pay to City an amoun£ equal to seven and one -half percent (7 1 /21) of Permittee's gross rivenues "collected hereunder. During the remainder of the ten of this Agreement. including any extensions • thereof, Penittee shall par to City an amount equal to ten percent (101) of permitted t grass revenues collected here- under. All such payments durin the tam reof shall be made to rm City within thirty (30) days o� the conclusion of each calendar quarter during the tam hereof, including any extension thereof. Upon the expiration of any such thirty (30) day period, a delinquent assessment of twenty -five percent (25s) per month shall be levied against the unpaid balance. All remittances by t Permitted shall be accompanied by a report setting forth the basis and calculations used for computing the amount due. IX. FEES AND GRATUITIES Except as provided by the Agreement. Pdrdttee shall not. nor shall Permittee permit any agent, employee or subcontractor employed by it to request, solicit, demand or accept, either directly or indirectly, any compensation or gratuity for the collection of refuse. X. SUBCONTRACTORS Permitted shall not assign, transfer, or subcontract this Agreement, or any part thereof, without first obtaining the written consent of City. XI. WAIVERS No acquiescence, failure or neglect of either City or Permlttn to insist an strict performance of any or all of the terms of the ,. Agreement or of these Specifications shall be considered as or y constitute a waiver of any ten or condition of the Agreawt or any • performance required thereunder, or any remedy, damage or other liability arising out of such refusal, neglect or liability arising out of such refusal, neglect or inability to perform at any tip. Init %5� In1t -30- • � �d1 XII. LAMS AND REGULATIONS A. lo" ttee shall :amply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations ngj sdiction applying to woorkido" Or all to be do" under the oorrdfn�anas of City of the Coun Conform SanBer�nardinodand of athe cities through which refuse collected may be hauled or wherein refuse my be deposited. g- Permute@ shall exonerate, indsenify and hold Mrml@st Cfty and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, from and against and shall assume full responsibility for payment of all eoetribOr SUatry aannd d or Federal, State and local taxes or Social Securfty,-IIncome Tax Laws an�rk�lCo pennsationraLaws with respect to ►@rvAttM's employees engaged to the performance of the Agreement. XIII. CNAKES City Amy At any time by a written order direct that changes or extras be made In the work, specifications and schedules relating to the Agreement. If ORy such changes Cause an increase or decrease in the cost of, or the tine required for performance of the Agreement, an equitable adjustment shall be rde in the Agreement price or schedule, and the or strishi modified wiwith vrocedure$ established n Chapter 8.1a of he Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. � hp () dys js t tapbri+erted within thirty the under e of receipt Clause Of the notification of changes. However, nothing in this paragrapn shall excuse Pereittae from proceeding with the Agreement as changed. XIV. UNINTERRUPTED SERVICE Persfttae shall mmko all necessary arrangements to provide uninterrupted service to their industrial arst commercial accounts throughout the period of the Agreement. XV. INTERPRETATION OF DOCUMENTS In the event of any uncertainty, conflict or ambiguity in the term of the Agme reent this@ Specifications or of any ordinance of the City regardding paRormmnce under theAg reemmnt, the City Manager shall have the right to make an interpretation and such interpretation shall be final. Penitt" Agnes to adhere to and comply with any such interpretation of the City Manager. Init. , In1 -1l- re: roJ EXHIBIT 8 r Establishing charges for the "follo�ring services and procedures: refuse collection, truck inspection• -feces in .permit processing, fees. These charges n „ for services aM procedures are established herewith by the City Council at the Lire said permit is granted. ` I. ESTABLISHING CHARGES FOR SERVICE ti ?, A. Commercial and Industrial establishment rate utilizing three w cubic yard refuse containers: IN 1. Wximm monthly, rate, shall be as follows in respect to frequency of service a. One service weekly $52.00, b. Two services weekly $80.00 c. Three services weekly" $108.00 d. Four services weekly $136.00 e. Five services weekly $164.00 f. Six services weekly $192.00 . Monthly rates in "'respect to frequency shall not be less than eighty -five percent (e5$) of the stated raximm rate. 2. Food handling and food proeesslnea yy establisheents as defined by Chapter 8.18 (coter- balanced 11d). Monthly rates shall be as follows in respect to frequency of service. a. Two services weekly $92.00 b. Three services weekly $120.00 c. Four services weekly $148.00 d. Five services weekly $176.00 e. Six services weekly $204.00 Monthly rats in respect to frequency shall not be less than q' eighty -five percent (85%) of the stattd raxiesm rates. B. Roll off container up to weximm forty (40) cubic yards. 1. Mexiesm rate of $165.00 per service (dump), however container shall be serviced (dumped) at least four ties per, month. s Rate in respect to frequency shall not be less than, etghtU -five percent (85$) of the stated arximm rates. C. Temporary service (less than thirty days) 1. Three (3) cubic yard containers t`5 " a., NerImm rate of $38.00 for seven (7) days at location C ; b. Maxvwm rate of $23.00 for each additional service NAIL Rey t;` ,l t, Init. Int -13- eso a- r V -. w a rsr iTaili2W.t 3 � a�J Rate in respect to fragwncy shall not be less than eighty -five percent (851) of.the'stated maximum rates. 2. Roll off container up'to maxim forty (40) cubic yards. a. rAxio- rata 'of $165.00 per service (dump), however container shall be serviced (dumped) at least axe every seven:(7),days. ' Rate in respect to fregwncy shall not be less than eighty -fire percent (86%) of the stated maximum rates. II. REFUSE COLLECTION TRUCK INSPECTION FEES A. Pursuant to 8.18.230 of the Rancho Cucaenngs Municipal Code each refuse truck shall be inspected annually and authorized for service. 1. Annual fee for each authorized refuse muck in service shall be $SO.CO 2. In the event a refuse truck is found not to have been inspected and authorized, then it shall be immediately removed from service end a $500.00 fee be paid t0 the City. B. This fee shall be reviewed an an annual basis. III. RATE ADJUSTMENT A. The charges for service established herein may be reviewed once annually comwncing in January 1986 by the City Council. B. All revisions in charges levied by a permfttea must be submitted to the City Council for review and action and must be approved by resolution of the City Council following a public hearing upon at least ten (10) days' written notice to the permittee. IV. PERMIT PROCESSING FEE A. Processing fee (non - refundable) for industrial and coal arcial refuse collection permit and renewal of permit shall be $2.000.00. B. This fee shall be reviewed on an annual basis. Init. Int -13- eso a- r V -. w a rsr iTaili2W.t 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 4 j DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager + FROM: Robert A Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Resolutions for Proposed Assessment District 86 -2 and Setting The Public Hearinu. RECOMMENDATION• It Is recommended that City Council consid,r the formation F of the proposed Assessment District 86 -2 as petitioned by 1 property owners on April 2, 1986. y BACKGROUND: On April 2, 1986, staff presented to City Council a request from numerous developers to form a Drainage Assessment �,• District east of Haven Avenue north of the Southern Pacific �Y Railroad extending to Banyan Avenue south of Chaffey College. ti Included In the request were petitions from over sixty percent of the property owners. Additionally, Dwight French, the District Assessment Engineer, indicated that the maximum protest would not exceed seven percent of the property owners Several resolutions were adopted Initiating the formation process; they are as follows: 1) Selection of and agreements with the following Consultant Team: a) Assessment Engineer: Dwight P. French, Inc. b) Bond Counsel: Naza -ek, Harper, roDkins and M�edrlln c) Bond Underwriters: Stone and Youngberg r 2) Resolution Adopting the Proposed Boundaries r� 3) Resolution Accepting Petitions and Waiving the Preparation of a Debt Report Page 2 of 3 S4) Resolution Declaring Intention to Order the Construction of Certain Improvements and f, Ordering Preparation of Preliminary Engineer's t, Report a ANALYSIS• The land Incorporated in the proposed district is experiencing active development which may be compromised if cooperative installation of drainage cannot be accomplished The area landowners have attempted for several years to accomplish this project on their own; however, they believe an assessment district would best solve their problems. On December 6, 1986, a workshop was held to answer, question RAR:JBP:kmm w._ Attachments .72-7 and provide information to land owners. One person did express an inability to pay assessment if proposed district ' is approved. A copy of this citizen's letter is attached with a list of those in attendance The amount to be paid for acquisitions, work and ' improvements Is $2,948,460 with $2,737,167 balance to assessment. The assessment amount applicable to Barclay's property may be in jeopardy because of financial inviability of the property owner. If the assessments were to become delinquent the City may be required to Initiate foreclosure proceedings. This would increase the administration, time 4 and cost for this district after its formation. Therefore, staff must qu.tlify its recommendation of approval of the proposed district. Additionally, staff desires to use the 4 firm of Pieldman, Rolapp and Associates as Pinanclal ' Advisors. A copy of the agreement is enclosed for your review. It City Council approves the attached resolutions, a public hearing will be held at 7:30 p.m on March 4, 1987 at the Lions Community Center, 9161 Baseline P.nad. :a F A list of the resolutions and their purposes Is attached for your review. Respectfully Su fitted, i ert A. Assistant ty Manager RAR:JBP:kmm w._ Attachments .72-7 ■ L Page 3 of 3 J' eso ution Amending Assessment Proceedings: Amendment to proce3dings to change designation to Assessment District -No. 86 -2 and appointing new Superintendent of Street.s Resolution Authorizing Execution of Agreements for '•• "' " Acauislt.ton and Financlro: Formal authorization for the City to enter into agreements with certain developers whereby the developers will construct a portion of the Improvements and be reimbursed from bond proceeds. Resolution Regarding Construction of Improvements by Developers: Determination that substantial portion of Improvements to be acquired have been constructed by Developers. Resolution Amending Resolution of Intention_ Amendment to Resolution of Intention No. 06 -93 declaring intention to order construction and acquisition of Improvements and making other determinatiors. Preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report and setting the date, time and place for the public hearing. Resolution Referencing Wage Scale and Calling for Hide: Formal authorization to receive bide on the Improvements to be constructed. Resolution Authorizing Negotiations for Sale of Bonds: Formal authorization for the City staff to negotiate the sale of bonds with the Underwriter to fund the improvements to perform as the Financial Consultant. a , w ATTENDANCE AT LIONS PARK DECEMBER 6, 1986 MEETING FOR PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -z Landowners /Reoreaentativee of Landowners: Greg Brayman, Oxford Develcpment Dwight French, Dwight French and Associates Kenneth Green, Glenfed Development Corporation Brian Catalda, Paragon Homes Inc. Lawrence Bliss, Highland -Haven Association Sophie Morin, Property owner - Highland and Haven Avenue Steven Ford, The William Lyon Company Mary L Murdock, Diversified Shopping Centers Cal Queyrel, Anacal Engineering Company City of Rancho Cucamonga Staff+ Jerry H. Pulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator Bonnie Cabrinha, Assessment Revenue Assistant Larry Rolapp, Pieldman, Rolapp and Associates John Doyle, Stone and Youngberg Eugene A. Nazarek, Nazarek, Harper, Hopkins and McParlin Shintu Bose, Senior Civil Engineer �� ti �. - �� j ;•� � 'V �w � •; i "� � �� �� ' 1 1, 1 � :'. ' mil. s�y ;` •�.,, ,.:�;,.� •- pia ' • :3 * -�� �_? ''o �4:'x `..a;,ic+�- +"3''-�"S -L .ti o" � • i' `, r.�x �� is ' '. - �...- 1:ri'S'��"5`�gxs� ��'G�°'S'•.•`. `fax :+.:V'td:i��+�i - .:.�.'ci;nei• -��re -3 -iir:. - � - t. 910 � r 9 3�r- .�.� Rf' ae.' �, �• S, is ,���".'�a� {v;.- yi+'v'3,�,'�•�: c� �.1t1 .{`a "..' � "� i .., . y >�i sev�£�q�x [VOIY[ �. I.,J�LU• O[OI.Ot M. Y[IMUM• v rY1oYO..' crwnm MM, 61 WAZAREX a XCIPART" • w11vi.1 YO•M nY.OYt+. C'YW.NY 8301 I 111 STORM SUMS [[[ IaVDM C[LI:' IEVIT& Ytl /a • UYI T81-8494 '['[GONG a., ""I" January 13, 1967 city of Rancho Cucamonga 9330 Baseline, suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Attnt Jerry Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator Re: Opinion on property in Bankruptcy Assessment District No. 66 -2 Dear Nr. rulwood: Ht R n0111T, W L.M[ w"[ lea Lw 0[MUIn114 Cu✓OOnu tM08 AW 8MY00 In accordance with your request, this office has evaluated the effect of the assessment proceedings upon one of the parcels of ywperty in Assessment District No. 66 -2 (the "Subject Property) which has been included in proceedings before the baNavptcy court. To the best of our 'Mowledys, the liana upon the subject Property by private individ;uls or corporations rather than liens imposed by state or federal agencies, except for property taxes. It is the opinion of this office that the imposition of an ►` assessment lien under Assessment District No. 66-2 will take priority over all existing lions imposed by private persons Or corporations (the "Private Liens"); however, the assessment xlien will be on parity with any State or federal tax.liens. �''T Furthermore, if the semi- annual installments on the assessment ` lien are not paid, a judicial foreclosure action by the city will eliminate all of the pre - existing Private Liens. - _ i It is the recommendation of this office that the city favorably consider inclusion of the Subject Property in the •= Assessment District, with the understanding that a future tte�r judicial foreclosure may be necessary to either eliminate .x` pre - existing Private Liens or to compel payment of the �xr assessment lien. Very truly yours, �. 14¢ s A. Naaarsk EAX:mdh cos Dwight French t John Doyle ' f 1W :�:r', uw anrcu er ' City of Rancho Cucamonga January 13, 1987 Page Two i It is the recommendation of this office that the city favorably consider inclusion of the Subject Property in the •= Assessment District, with the understanding that a future tte�r judicial foreclosure may be necessary to either eliminate .x` pre - existing Private Liens or to compel payment of the �xr assessment lien. Very truly yours, �. 14¢ s A. Naaarsk EAX:mdh cos Dwight French t John Doyle ' f RESOLUTION NO. ?? — 03? REOOIATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN B=TARDIHO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ANLNCING ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HO. e6 -2) WHEREAS, the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City ") is considering the formation of an assessment district, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 (commencing with Section 10000) of the Streets ar—A Highways code, for certain public work and improvements and acquisitions, if necessary, generally described as follows: The construction and acquisition of drainage improvements including appurtenances and appurtenant work, acquisition interests in real property, if necessary, and incidental expenses in connection therewith (the *improvements"); and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the assessment proceedings heretofore taken: NOW, THEREFORE, the city council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The land to be specially assessed for the Improvement shall be included within an assessment district designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -2 t (the "Assessment District ") and all prior proceedings shall be amended to reflect the aforementioned designation of the Assessment District. SECTION 3. The person appointed to assume the responsibilities and perforce the duties of Superintendent of Streets for the Assessment District shall be RUSSEL MAGUIRE (the "Superintendent of Streets "). a9y . RESOLUTION no, 97 -o3(- RESOLUTION or THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ACQUISITION AND FINANCING AGREEMENTS . (��SS DISTRICT NO. 56 -2) ., WHEREAS, the City council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga (the "city ") is considering the formation of an assessment district, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvoaent Act of 1910 ", being Division 18 (commencing with Section 10000) of the Struts and Highways Coda, for certain public work and improvements and acquisitions, if necessary, generally described as follows: The construction and acquisition of drainage improvements including appurtenances and appurtenant work, acquisition of interests in real property, if necessary, and incidental expenses in connection therewith (the "Improvements ") t and WHEREAS, the City council has received a Petition signed by owners of assessable property within the Assessment District requesting construction and/or financing and acquisition of Improvements and waiving proceedings and limitations under Division t of the Streets and Highways Codet f WHEREAS, the City council has received and reviewed several agreements entitled "Agreement for Acquisition and Financing" for a portion of the Laprovements, pursuant to Section 66 467 of the Government Code: NOW, THEREFORE, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucemonga does hereby RESOLVE, DETEMUM,AND ORDER as follovs: ^.� SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. W SECTION Z. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes execution of the agreements specified as follows: (a) Agreement for Acquisition and Financing, Assessment District No. 86 -2 (Agreement No. 1) }. between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Glenfed Develapaent Corporation. W �9r k L b S Y I (b) Agreement for Acquisition and Financing, Assessment District No. 06 -2 (Agreement No. 2) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Lan :en Development, Inc. (c) Agreement for Acquisition and Financing, Assessment District No. 06 -2 (Agreement No. 3) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Diversified Investments IIl. (d) Agreement for Acquisition and Financing, Assessment District No. 06 -2 (Agreement No. 4) botveen the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Paragon Nomes, Inc. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the remaining Improvements shat be constructed by the City from proceeds from the sale of bondis and proceeds received during the cash collection period. SECTION a. The foregoing agraemeatn shall be filed with the transcript of these proceedings and shall be open to public inspection. SECTION s. This resolution ahall tale effect upon adoption. U S' �.'. i"_'' fe*-= i'i^n.°...�- � "�';�•:.'f.:� �S:` iati�4�e14"�:., -�. _ .,t � _ w�*!ti:tiu� ai°i:A+ RESOLUTION No. Q% -03'7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ,., OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MAIGNG DETERMINATIONS THAT CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS BY CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNERS HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED r (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -2) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "city ") is considering the formation of an ? assessment district, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 (commencing with section l0000) of the Streets and Highways Code, for certain public work and • improvements and acquisitions, if necessary, generally described as followst The construction and acquisition of drainage improvements including appurtenances and appurtenant work, acquisition of interests in real property, if necessary, and incidental expenses in connection therewith (the "improvements ")s and WHEREAC, the City Council has received a Petitioa signed by owners of assessable property within the Assessmcnt District requesting constriction and /or financing and ac qu isition of Improvements and waiving proceedings and imitations under Division a of the Streets and Highways Codes WHEREAS, the City council has authorised execution of several agreements entitled "Agraement for Acquisition and t Pinancing" for a portion of the Improvements, pursuant to z. Section 66162 of the Government Code: L+ N, �aRO council � the City o Cucamonga d sby THEREFORE, the follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. fyy SECTION 2. The City Council fLnds and determines: NNE- (a) That the property owners have substantially ,s completed construction of a portion of the Improvements, pursuant to the Agreements for Acquisition and Financings and P. ya t` S i r C t t f, (b) That the Resolution of Intention may be amended to provide for the acquisition of the improvements constructed by the proper owners, pursuant to the Agreements for Acqu sit on and Financing. SPCTIoN 3. The foregoing findings and determinations are based upon a Cortiflcato of the Engineer of Work an Oil* in these proceedings. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clark I, BEVERLY ADTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that •he foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said city Council held on the _ day of , 1987. Executed this ,_, day of , 1987 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clark o- RESOLUTION NO. 87 -03a RESOLUTION OF THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 86 -93; DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER SIM CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHE^ - WITH APPORTF]IANCES IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT .t DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 191301 DECLARING THE IMPROVEMENTS TO RE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY BENBFITI E DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO HE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BL.gDS (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 1986 -2) ' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "city ") is considering the formation of an assessment district, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1:13 ", being Division 12 (commencing With Section 10000) of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for certain public works and improvements and acquisitions (the Y "Improvements "); and t x WHEREAS, the City has heretofore adoptad Resolution of Intention No. 86 -93 declaring its intention to order construction of the Improvemantal and WHEREAS, the construction of portions of the Improvements have been substantially completed by certain property owners under Agreements for Acquisition and Financing authorised by the City, pursuant to Section 66 462 of the Goverruent Code) and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to amend Resolution of Intention No. 86 -93 in order for the City to declare its intention to order construction of the unconstructed portion of the Improvements and to order acquisition of the constructed portion of the Improvements, declare the Improvements to be of n T i A e« I more than local or ordinary benefit, describe the lands to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of the Improvements, provide for the issuance of bonds and make other determinations: NOW, TNZREZORE, the city Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE, DECLARE AND ORDER as fnllows: nvor.AnATION OF INTMUION SECTION 1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the intention of the City, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", to order construction and acquisition of the Improvements in a special assessment district known and designated as ]19SE58.MM DISTRICT N0. 1986 -2 (the "Assessment District "). DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVPNENT_3 RECTION 2. (a) The Improvements are generally described as follows: The construction and acquisition of drein- age iuprovanents 'together with appurten- ances and appurtenant work, acquisition of interests in real property, if necessary, and incidental expenses in connection therewith The Improvements shall be located in certain public streets and rights -of -way in the Assessment District. For f rthor particulars, referents 1s hereby teade to a Map of the Assessment District previously adopted. (b) The struts, rights -cf -way and easements shall be shown upon the plane herein referred to and to be _ filed with these proceedings. r O 30/ ■ e ' ;, All of the Improvements stall be in the particular locations, of the forms, sizes, dimensions and materiels, and at the lines, grades and elevations as f, 77't, shown and delineated upon the plans, profiles and i.• �;.�. specifications to be prepared therefor. (d) The description of the improvements and the termini S therecf contained in this Rsrolution are general in nature. The Improvements do not necessarily extend for the full length of the description thereof. The plans and profiles of the Improvements contained in the Engineers Report she!.. be controlling as to the correct and detailed description thereof. (a) Whenever any public way is herein referred to as i! running between two public ways, or from or to any f public way, the intersections of the public ways are At included to the extent that Improvements to be done yr therein are shovr, on the plans. (f) Notice is hereby given of the fact that in many cases the Improvesents will bring the finished grade to a grade different from that formerly existing and, to that extent, the grades are hereby changed and the y` Improvements will be done to the changed grades. nESCPSPTION Or ASStSSNLNT DISTRICT SECTION I. The Improvements are of direct benefit to the p and land vtthin the As•iesement District and the City properties p za hereby makes the costs and expenses of the Improvements. ` 30/ ■ e ' ;, chargeable upon the Assessment District which is hereby daclared to be the Assessment District benefited by the Improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of the Imprcv, cents. The Assessment District is described as follows All that territory in the Assessment District included within the exterior boundary lines shown on the Nap exhibiting the property benefited by and to be assessed to pay the costo and expenses of the Improvements in the An ssaant District, which Nap is titled and identified as "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSA6IAT DISTRICT NO. e6 -2" and which map was heretofore approved and is on file with the transcript of these proceedings, EXCEPTING from the area shown within and delineated upon the Nap, the area Of all public streets, public avenues, pudic lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, and all easements and rights -of -way therein contained belonging to the public. For all particulars as to the boundaries of the Assessment District, refer- ence is hereby made to the Nap and for a complete description of the Assessment District, the Nap on file shall govern. SECTION d. The proposed Improvements are hereby referred to the Engineer of work who is directed to prepare and file a written report (the "Report") which shall contain: (a) Plans and specifications of the Improvements; (b) An estimate of the cost of the Improvements, including the incidental expenses in connection therewith; (c) A diagram showing the Assessment District and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective 5 $o� ■ I subdivisions of land within the Assessment District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intcnticn (the "Diagram "). Each sub- ;. division shall be given a separate number upon the Diagramt _ (d) An assessment of the total amount of the assessable r-+ costs and expenses of the Improvaments upon the several subdivisions of land in proportion to the ` estimated benofits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from the Improvements (the wAssesssant "). The Assessment shall refer to the subdivisions upon the Diagram by the respective numbers thereof! and (a) A description of the Improvements and acquisition of Interests in real property, where necessary. When any portion or percentage of the cost and expenses of the Improvements is to be paid from sources other than b_ assessments, the amount of such portion or percentage shall first be doducted from the total estimated costs and expenses of the Improvements and the Assessment shall include only the remainder of the estimated costs and expenses. BONDS SECTION 5. Notice is hereby given that serial bonds (the M G "Bondaw) to represent unpaid assessments, and bearing interest )ti at the rate of not to exceed the current legal maximum rate of PIZ i� 124 per annum, will be issued pursuant to the "improvement Bond M �• Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 (co>sencing with Section 8500) of the Streets and Highways code of the State of California. ■ f � r' rl :v s The last installment of tho Bonds shall matey a maximum of and not to exceed nineteen (19) years from the second day of September next aucceeding twelve (17) months from their date. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the Streets and Highways Code, which provides an alternative procedure for the advance payment of assessments and the calling the Bonds, shall apply. The principal amount of the Bonds maturing each year shall be other than an amount equal to an even annual proportion of the aggragate principal of the Bonds, and the amount of principal maturing in each year, plus the amount of interest payable in that year, will be an amount that is approximately equal each year, except for an adjustment in the first years assessment. BOND REOENPTION SECTION 6. The City Council elects that the Bonds, upon redamption prior to maturity, shall provide a premium of five percent (5i) on the unmatured principal and that language shall be added to the redemption clause in the bond fora to require the property owner to pay the premium in order to discharge the obligation of the lion prior to maturity. SPECIAL FOND SECTION 7. The City council astablisbas a spacial fund designated IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -1 into which moneys may be transferred, at any time to expedite the ` construction or acquisition of the Improvements. The moneys are Soy a loan and shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the gals of the i Bonds an authorized by law. BECTION e. If any excess shall be realized from the assess- sent, it shall be used, in such amounts as the city council any r'd determine, for one or more of tho following purposes: '• (a) Transfer to the general fund, provided that the amount of any such transfer shall not exceed the lesser of x One Thousand Dollara ($1,000.00) or five percent (St) of the total amount expanded from the Improvement Fund; (b) As a credit upon the assessment and any supplemental assessment as provided in Section 10427.11 or (c) For the maintenance of the Improvements. c KNUNIC PAL I"ROVEMM ACT OP 1913" SECTION 9. Except as otherwise provided for the issuance of the Bonds, all of the Improvements shall be made, acquired and ordered pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 19130. PROPERTY .- PUBLIC SECTION 10. All public property in the use and performance of a public function shall be omitted from assessment in these ' proceedings unless expressly provided and listed herein. ACQUISITION i- SECTZgv 11. The public interest, convenience and necessity �, \• � require: ., i; •,":,,', (a) mat certain land, rights-of-way or easements be a, R� acquired in order to allow the Improvements for this rr �` �•• Assessment District to be accomplished: and (b) That the portion of the Improvements constructed by property owners undeL Agreements Y. ...qulzAtion and Financing be acquired. For a general description of the location and extent of the easements or land to be acquired and the Improvements to be ;k acquired, reference is hereby made to maps on file with the transcript of these proceedings. ,4 GRAPES t" &ECTZON IZ. Notice is hereby given that the grade to which the Improvements shall be done is to be shown on the plans and profiles therefor, which grade may vary from the existing grades. The Improvements shall be done to the grades as indicated on the plans and specifications, to which reference is .. made for a description of the grade at which the Improvements shall be done. Any objections or protests to the proposed grade �w shall be made at the public hearing to be conducted under these proceedings. , , r V' V-•' :9 SECTION 11. The city Council determines that it is in the public interest and more economical to do certain work on private property to eliminate any disparity in level or size between the Improvements and private property and to add the actual cost of such work to the Assessment of the property to which such work was Bonet provided that no work of this nature shall be performed L' until and unless the written consent of the owner of property is r first obtained. SO4 w �. PRIVATE CONTRACT SECTION la. Notice is hereby given that the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners to take the contract for the construction of the Improvements and that, as authorized by law, no notice of award of contract shall be published. PROCEEDII;GS TITODIRIES SECTION 15. All inquiries for any and all information relating to these proceedings, including information relating to protest procedures, should be directed to: Jerry Fulwood, luuzamant Revenue Coordinator city of Rancho Cucamonga 9161 baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (714) 989 -1651 SECTION 16. adoption. EFFECTIVE DATE This resolution shall be affective upon its '%1 G3 r yni RESOLUTION No. Q7 -o37 RESOLUTION OF TUB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN ZZRNARDIHO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PASSING AND GIVING PRILI)QNARY APPROVAL TO TIM RIPORT OF THE IOiGINEIR OF WORE AND APPOINTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC NEARING (A98LS8MENT DISTRICT NO, 86 -2) i WHEREAS, the City Council of the city of Rancho y Cucamonga (the "City ") is considering the formation of an assessment district, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 (comsancing with Section 10000) of 3' the Streets and Highways Code, for certain public work and improvements and acquisitions, if necessary, generally described as followsn The construction and acquisition of drainage improvements including appurtenances and appurtenant work, acquisition interests in real property, if necessary, and incidental expenses in connection therewith (the "Improvesents ")L and WHEREAS, the land to be specially assessed for the i Improvements shall be included within an assessment district designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -2 (the "Assessment District"); and " WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 10201 and 10201 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Engineer of Work has prepared and presented a report (the "Engineer's Report"): NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: s` SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The El.ginesr's Report is hereby preliminarily approved and adopted as follows: (a) The plans and specifications for the Improvements to be made and acquired, contained in the Engineer's Report, are hereby oraliminarily approved and adoptedt t• T ` X ,3o P •: 7F - (b) The estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of thi Improvements, contained in the Engineer's Report, is hereby preliminarily approved and adopted. (c) The diagram shoving the Assasorent District described in the Resolution of Intantion and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective }, subdivisions of land within the Assessment District, as the same existed at the time of the - passage of the Resolution of Intention, such of which subdivisions having bean given a separate • number upon the diagram, as contained in the Engineer's Report, Is hereby preliminarily approved and adopted; - (d) The proposed assessments upon the several subdivisions of land in the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from the Improvements, as contained in the Engineer's Report, are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted; and (a) The maps and descriptions of the interests in real property and Improvements to be acquired, as contained in the Eng mar's Report, are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted. SECTION 3. The Engineer's Report shall stand for the + purpose ose of all subsequent tio bseque proceedings undertaken pursuant to e. n r gyCTION 1. The City Council hereby appoints the date, time and place for the public hearing as follows: 7:20 P.H. Councill Lhambers March 4, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 92670 (the "Public Hearing ") and provides that any interested person may object to the proposed Improvements, the extent of the Assessment District, or the proposed asseasment by filing a written protest with the city Clark at or before the time sat for the hearing. Such protest must contain a description of the property in which each signor thereof is interested sufficient to identify the same and, if the signers are not shown on the lest equalized assessment roll as the owners of such property, must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signers are the owners of such property. $a9 UCTIOx s. The City Clark is hereby diractel to cause notice of the Public Hearing and the passage of the Resolution of _ Intention and this Resolution to be posted on all open streets- within the Imseuaent District, not more than 300 feat apart on each street so posted, but not lass than three (3) in all, in the time, fora cad sanner proscribed in Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code. g=ION S. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of the Public Hearing and of the passage of the Resolution of intention amd this Resolution to be given by publication, pursuant orm rnd Section in the Division Government f�the Street time, Highways Code. sycTICN 7. The city Clark is hereby directed to cause mailed notice of the Public Hearing and the adoption of the Resolution of Intention and the filing of the Lnginser's Report to be given to all persons owning real property proposed to be •amassed, whose names and addresses apyear on the last equalised assesseont roll for County tames or �• known to the City Clerk and to all other parsons, in the time, fora and manner prescribed in Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code. g1=10 A. The City Clem is hereby directed to cause a copy of the proposed boundary sap to be filed in the Office of the county Recorder within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of the Rasolution, in the form proscribed in Division 4.5 of the Streets and Highways Coda. SECTION 2. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption. =tiff Vii%; FEBOLUTION N0. -12--0910 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, X1FKRXMCXNG PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND CALLING FOR CONSTRUCTION AIDS (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -2) WHEREAS, the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City ") is considering the formation of an assessment district, pursuant to the "Nunioipal Improvement Act of 19176, being Division 12 (commencing with Section 10000) of the Streets and Highways Code, for certain public works and improvements and acquisitions, if necessary, generally dascriba.i as follows: The construction and acquisition of drainage improvements including appurtanances and appurtenant work, acquisition of interests in ), real property, if necessary, and incidental expenses in connection therewith (the "7mprovsment. °)t WHEREAS, the lands to be specially assessed for the Improvements shall be included within an assessment district designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -2 (the "Assessment tstrict ")t WHEREAS, 't is the intention of the City to call for sealed proposals or bids for the Improvements to be constructed in the Assessment Districts WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine the prevailing rate of wages for the various classifications of workers required in the construction and installation of the Improvements: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as followst NCCB. t, �1 SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. =� yi pp •'; E SECTION ]. it is hereby determined and ascertained that the general prevailing rate of per dian wages in the locality in which said work described is to be performed in the Tatter of the construction of the Imprcvemw:tits in the Assecemant District, under the "Municipal improvement Act of 1913 ", for each craft or type of worker or mechanic needed to execute the contract, and also the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work for each craft or type of worker or mechanic, is in accordance with the schedule obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of California, and reference l0 hereby made to copies thereof on file with the transcript of these proceedings, which schedule is available to any interested party upon request. Further, a copy thereof shall be posted at each job site during the course of construction. SECTION 3. The proposals or bids shall be publically opened and examined and the results of the bidding shall be reported to the City Council at the next regular meeting after the opening of the bids. SECTION 4. The toss and conditions for bidding on the improvements for the Assessment District are set forth in full in the specifications and Contract Documents as previously approved by the City. Leferenco is hereby made to the notice hereby approved and identified as follows: A:oTICt INVITING SEBIED BIDS (CONSTRUCTION) ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -3 For all particulars as to Adding, the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids (construction) above re :'erenced and approved by the city shall govern and all terms and :onditiouz for bidding shall be subject to the "Local Aguncy public Construction Act ", being Division Z (commencing with Section 20480) of the public Contract code. gf,CTION 5. It is hereby determined that in the event the contractor, contractingwners included, does not complete the work within the time limit specified in the contract or within the time limit as the City shall authorize, the contractor or contracting owners, as the case may 'is, shall pay as liquidated damages the amount or amounts as rot forth in the specifications for the Improvomants, which amounts are incorporated herein by reference. 1't is impractical to , determine the actual damage which will be sustained by reason of such delay, but the stated amount is a reasonable amount for liquidated damages and is not being imposed as a penalty. U&TION 6. This resolution shall take effect upon ' adoption. t .•. iJ: y.a RESOLUTION NO. 9 ?--OVI RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CXTY or RANCHO CU"CAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE SALE Or BONDS TO BE ISSUED TO r.EPRESENT UNPAID ASSESSMENTS UPON LANDS IM A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (ASSTOS}¢NT DISTRICT. NO, _86 -Z) AHERz s, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City "), has previously adopted its Resolution of Intention pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1919 ", being Division 17 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction and acquisition of certain works of improvement in a special assessment district designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 66 -2 the ( "Assessment District ")R WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that serial bonds shall be issued to finance the costs and expenses of the Improvements and proceedings, pursuant to the "improvement Bend Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 (commencing with Section 8500) of the Streets and Highways Code (the "Bonds "): NOW, THIREPORE, the city Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga doss hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORIMR as follows: SECTZcll. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION z. The City Council hereby authorizes the City staff to negotiate the terms and conditions for the sale of Bonds to be issued to represent unpaid assessments on land r., in the Assessment District with STONE 6 YOUNGBERG (the "Underwriter ") and to present a recommendation concerning such sale for approval by the city council. gXcTIox d. city staff is authorised and directed to prepare and provide information about the City and the Assessment District to the Underwriter for the purpose of securing a proposal for them Sala of Bonds. 3/S r.;.. r• `• BaLTION a. The interest rata on bonds shall not exccod the current legal naximxof twelve percent (114) per annum and the bonds shall be subje(rt to-all of the terms and prcvisiona - set forth in the "Imprcrrsmant bond act of 1915• and the is R ^solution of Intention for theme proceedings. STCTIQN S. The City Council shall adopt a Resolution Determining Unpaid Assessments and authorizing Issuance of bonds ''t`,• rior to the final delivery of•bonds to the Underwriter, and the i• issuance and sale of bonds shall be subject to the terns and provisions of such resolution. `Il''• BECTIQN a. The City council will provide, at no §a expense to the Underwriter, the unqualified legal opinion of ,,• - NAZAREa A NCiARLIN, Attorneys at Law, attasting to the validity of the proceedings and the snforesabi?.ity of the bonds. BRCTION T. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption. 1907. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , � r' AYES: NOES: Y ;F. ABSENT: 9ennli F,. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: i Beverly A. Authelet, City Clark I, BEVERLY AUTNELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wee n 61 duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the n(; City of Raacho Cucemonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Cou..Cil held on the _ day of , 1987. Yy„ Sxecuted this _ day of , 1987 at Rancho ki Cucamonga, California. s 0 u 3�y city clerk_`; !Y` RES0LUTI06 No. 87- oq,;- RESOLUTION Of TEE CITY CODRCIL OP TSE CITY O1 RANCSO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, NAMG DESIC'IATIONS AND APPOINMWTS TO ZULFILL RESPON9IAMITIE3 AND PERFORM DUTIES FOR SPECIAL ASSISIKENT PROCERDIEGS (ASSESSMENT D113 119T NOiQ6_ -22 r . s VEEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the 'City ") is considering the Formation of an assessment diatriet, pursuant to the % Municipal Improvement Act of 1917 ", being Divislon 12 of the Streets and 4 Righvays Code, for certain public works and improsments and acquisition■, if accessary, generally described as follows: The construction and installation of drainage improvements including appurtenances and appurteeaut work, acquisitioo, if necessary, and incidental expenses in connection therewith i t (the "Improvmentoe); ARCREAS, the lands to be specially assessed for the laprwmenta shall be included within an assessment district designated as �t ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -2 (the "Assessment District"): WHEREAS, the City desires to sske designations and appoietments to Y responsibilities and perform duties incic -•c to the aaaearbent proceedings. in the time. fora and aaanwr required by Im: NOW, THEREyORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE, DSTEREISE AND ORDER as follows: itSECTION The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The person appointed to assume the responsibilities and perfam the duties of Superintendent o£ Streets for the Assessment District ;,• shall be RUSSELL MAGUIRE (the "Superintendent of Streets "). i RC N : The Office of the Superintendent of Streets is beret) =� designated as the place for recordation of the assessment roll and diagram which shall be kept as a permanent record of the Assessment District. 3 /.f t , e' t tg• 1• a .l ■ SECTION 4t She Pinw cial'Consultant to be designated shall be . PIELMAE. ROLAPP A ASSOCIATES PASSED, APPROVED, ind ADOPTED this 21st day of January, 1987. AYES: ROES1 ARSEMTr Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Autbelet, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. ADTKLET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho CerLOnga, California, do hereby certify that the fccegoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reecho Cecaeonµ, California, at a regular nee tint of said City Council held on the list day of January, 1987. Executed this 22ad day of Janoary, 1987 at Rancho Cuneaaga, California. Severly A. Autbelet, City Clerk 314 Y - Fieldmau, Rolapp do Associates MieCV& MMZ" CONMATMO September I3, 1986 a c, City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 C Banliae Road P.O. Boa 807 P,' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Attu. Jerry Fulwood r Re: Financial Consultant Services + Assessment District No. 86.1 `.. ' Deer Mr. Fulwood: Pursuant to your request. Fieldmaa, Rolapp R Associates Is pleased to submit this letter Agrecsent to the. City of Reach* Caamonp (the ' Agcecy') for municipal ? fiaaaclal aanitaat services to be performed in coejaaetloa with the financ!ag of q the proposed improvement$ for Arnssmeat District Nor. 116.1 (the 'Assmoust District'), We radentoad titer the project involves storm dnla Improvements aid _ appurtenances (tke 'Projeet9 within the Assessment District: that anessmeat C proceedings will be conducted la,aceordasce with the Municteal isprovemnt$ Act of 1913 sad the Issuance of Monde representing unpaid summers will be in accordance with the Improvement Mood Act of 1913 (the 'Boodso). I e We have extensive experience in handling the aforsnssaSloaed method of financing. We offer to snot you in a financial advisory capacity by vtilWsg and raking r- available to you the research, statistical and consultant stdf of our or esiratias to such extent u may be necessary red helpful. Mr. Lawrence O. Rolapp will be directly responsible for providing flucelal consultant nrvlen to you. Our services an be divided Cato three pluses. The first phase would be concerned with the financial planning and all other necessary annlyset, public meetings, workshops, conferences sad Parings required up to and Including tht confirmation of necessitate. The second phase would be concerned will fun4►iag financial consultant services to be performed is conjunction with tke marketing of the Bonds representing unpaid assessments. Phew three would involve any financial advice relative to the administration of the Bonds subsequent :o their Issuance. `jam We agree to provide financial consultant services in connection with any and all Agency financing requirements a they pertain to the Project. { _ • Boas Ma stous" Cud" vrb%Batt• am faelrr. Cniltesala agora • 8714 7sa•ml - '�,�'��.•. r ant 11, x, will We ty� � perform lH foibwL/ addideul services in toaJanctloa with the y` marketing of loads pursue! to the 1913/13 Improvement Acts. r. L Mz1kA LL.Lal.1{e" Faralsh the Alancy, with Informatica coaceralaa Current municipal load market eosditioas and make recommeadatieu as to the technical details of the fluncial, including maturity eckedak% funds, covesants, redemption festurm, and other details whck w111, In oar opleloa, make the proposed Meaning most acceptable to prospective purchasers and, therefore, marketable at the lowest possible lateral rate. IL lYtuLattil�y(a, At the direction of the Aaeecy, we will et'ot:atc a Shia of the t" • coetemplated Bends. i; r mset:vu MMOIAL CCNYATAM -1. r AS 12 L rm i,•lurrr 5wree. We will confer,wltil your Staff, Bond Counsel aad Consulting Engiscern for the purpose of nuking a prelimiaavy Survey of the Project and to amlst In the formulation of a Coordinated plan to finance the Project ii. AtbWu» el r Y4 ar•ell•w/Wrk. _ We will attend any meetings concerning the Project wSen deemed -- 'r neemar- and, Is addition, be available to meet with the affected PfWrq o`:ner(s) to explain Ike effects of say proposed financial. ry We will be available for consultation mad advice satil such time as the - loads lured to finance the Project have been sold. IV Wr s tan, nod fd •w We will be available to conduct and!or participate !a work sessions and seminars which may be held to discuss the Project and methods of public financing. •, v. htlte x r . Wit will atlesa all paNk hnsriags ws)ulrsd by the Drovicka: of the Waskipal latprovemast Act of 1913 and Mail participate is sae► bt • hearings to the csteat deemso aseemary. r ant 11, x, will We ty� � perform lH foibwL/ addideul services in toaJanctloa with the y` marketing of loads pursue! to the 1913/13 Improvement Acts. r. L Mz1kA LL.Lal.1{e" Faralsh the Alancy, with Informatica coaceralaa Current municipal load market eosditioas and make recommeadatieu as to the technical details of the fluncial, including maturity eckedak% funds, covesants, redemption festurm, and other details whck w111, In oar opleloa, make the proposed Meaning most acceptable to prospective purchasers and, therefore, marketable at the lowest possible lateral rate. IL lYtuLattil�y(a, At the direction of the Aaeecy, we will et'ot:atc a Shia of the t" • coetemplated Bends. i; r mset:vu MMOIAL CCNYATAM A. Assist the Agency in segotiatlag the sale of the contemplated Scads to the underwriter selected by the Agency and make appropriate recommeadatioa to the Agency. , B.• Review the fineclal aspects of all dscitmeats relating to the marketing of the proposed bade Including any Underwriter Disclosure Document. If a due dltigeace meeting is held, wa will participate is sack'due dillgeace meeting and assist you In the examlatloa of pertiseat fhaneiat data. IIL We will compute closing figures, including accrued Interest. and assist In Ike coerdisatioa of even of the closing. IV. Tabs of Deht Serrigg. After the Scads have been delivered, we will prepare and furnish the Ageaey a Table of Debt Service which will set forth actual semiannual and annual payments of principal and interest due on the loads VIL PraeJ.re ►seed_ After the loads have bees delivered we will prepare and furnish a Procedure &Usual to be used as a guide to service and administer the Bonds P IASlt Ills We will be available for consultation and advise to the Agency to assist Agency Staff in the administration of the District and the servicing of the i;onds f6iS For all services to be rendered under Phase I and Phase II resulting In the ale of Bonds hereunder, the Agency will pay as seven thousand five hundrel dollars ($7,300) for each series of Bonds. It is expressly understood that fees for services rendered are eoatingeat upon the sale and delivery of Bonds. Fees for services rendered under Phase Iii will be billed at our standard hourly rates to effect at the time such services are provided. (See Schedule •A•, attached hereto, for schedule of current hourly rates) In the event the Project is abandoned prior to the completion of financing, the Agency agrees to pay use a fee equal to the reasonable value of services rendered from the date of this Agreement to the dote of abandonment, not to exceed $3,000. Reasonable value for our services $hall be determined by using our current hourly rates In effect at the time of such abandonment, plus reimbursement for usual and customary out-or-packet expanses. Attachtl hereto Is Schedule 'A• of our hourly fate$ in effect as of the date of this Agreement taaaCVAL F&A4=L C40t"TAM9 1/9 Y. r S t L PAYMENT Payment for all cervices rendered and ekpensa Incurred pursuant to Phase I and Phase li of this Agreement shall be paid within forty-five (13) days following the award of the contemplated loads to a boat fide purchaser, is the event of absedoass"t or the Project. abaadoanaat fees shell be due sad payable Immediately aftet sock tbandoameat. Fees based on ht,crly rata shall be due and payable monthly. In= This Agreement shall - remain In felt fora and effect until the flaanchg contemplated herein has been completed or the Project Is abesdoned, whichever first omum It is expressly understood that this Aarecatesd does not latene to aad is not under t y circumstances to be construed as requiring us to perform any services which ..castltute the practice of law, we are employed Ian as expert fiasoeial advisory capacity only. If the fcrgolag Agreetaeat Is satisfactory to you, please take appropriate action to authorize Its acceptaaa by siplag and returaieg the duplicate copy hereof. � Respectfully subaillted.' FIELDMAN, ROLAPP A ASSOCIATES tQwreace O. olapp LOR:gc Attachment • ACCIEPTA14CI Executed on behalf of the _ 193_. or.. Title: Date: tUMMALFRANC1ALCONSM NAS this _ day of ■ SCHIDULR eA• SCHROULR OF FRIS RFFICTIVI JANUARY 1. 19M Pd.eiulr of the Fir 5125.00 For Hour TerY.lr[1 ALIT ... 61.00 Per Hoar Secretarial Sl.ff $23.00 Per Hour Wf"ALF#W C1AL CONSLLTANM .3.X/ 1 t1 „ D u 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 21, 1987 TO: MAyor and i4mbers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HUMTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY OF FDMTARA - City council rev w o use a rna ves or Minters Ridge Specific Plan on 567.6 acres of land within 0,2 City of Fontana, located on the north side of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek, west of Devore Freeway. I. RECOMMEIRIATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council review the attached information an the Hunters Ridge Specific Plan, end the Planning Commision recommendations an the protect. Staff should then be directed to prepare an appropriate response to the City of Fontana- II. BACKGR019D° The Hunters Ridge property (previously referred to as the Hunt Club) was formerly in the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence north of Etiwenda. It was annexed to the CSty of Fontana in 1985• However, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has an opportunity to comment on the Specific Plan as provided for in a settlement a cement with Fontana. The 4grJfaent resulted from litigation filed by the City upon action by 'AFCO removing the property from the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence and annexing it into the City of Fontana. The settlement agreement betwer. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana establishes that: A. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana acknowledge that the ewer of the 570 acres in the annexation area has by a separate agreement with Rancho Cucamonga agreed that the annexation area shall be developed at a density of rA more than an average of four units per gross acre. I OV CITY CD A. wtKMS r January c Page 2 B. Both the Cities of Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga we&vally r• III. PUNNING C"ISSIDN REVIEW AND CCMENTS: �r At its regular meeting of January 14. 1987, the Planning Coaisaion reviewed the three land use alternatives and offered the following comments and concerns for the City Council to consider: A. None of the three land use alternatives is acceptable. B. The alternatives are not 'qquualitatively different and therefore do not reflect the intent of the agreement i between the two cities. Nit s:. r, s 'C ' agree to permit development at densities no nigh.r than 5 those established by the present West Foothill Crrunity �r Plan. L C. The City of Fontana shall require pkvent of school •- impact fees and any other, fees which may be identified as necessary mitigation in the EIR or Specific Man. ' B. The two cities agree to cooperate in encouraging a r regional park west of the site in the area of the San Sevalne Creek. E. Three land use alternatives shall be presented to the City of Rancho Cucrmongs City Council and their comments will be given 'serious consideration• by the City of Fontana. F. The intent is that these three lard use Alternativas will be 'qualltativaly' different. G. Following the selection of one of the land use alternatives, the City of Fontana shall prepare and complete a Specific Plan and its Environment Impact Report. H. Fontana shall 'solicit and seriously consider% the i concerns of Rancho Cucamonga in preparation of a complete specific plan for the 'annexation area' and an Environmental Impact Report. .f III. PUNNING C"ISSIDN REVIEW AND CCMENTS: �r At its regular meeting of January 14. 1987, the Planning Coaisaion reviewed the three land use alternatives and offered the following comments and concerns for the City Council to consider: A. None of the three land use alternatives is acceptable. B. The alternatives are not 'qquualitatively different and therefore do not reflect the intent of the agreement i between the two cities. Nit s:. r, s 'C ' A CITY COUNCIL STHFF REPORT ' HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN January 21, 1987 Page 3 C. None of the three alternatives is consistent with the land use directives of the West Valley Foothills Plan. For example, the plan calls for a level of development that is an extension of adjoinin3 comm•nities and also directs new development to be compatible with the character of adjacent communities. The three land use 2 - alternatives submitted do not reflect these land . use guidelines. D. Improvement costs directly related to the project, but i within Rancho Cucamonga, must 'be provided by the devoloper and /or the City of Fontana. Major items include: Improvement of Cherry Aved:e to a major arterial between the project entrance and I -15, improvement of Summit Avemne and Duncan Canyon Road from the western boundary of the project site to th* future freeway intersection east of the site, and flood control iaorovcments at Summit Avenue and to the south resulting from realignment of the HaAer- Crawford Channel. E._ In addition to the above issues, the City of Fontana should consider and respond to tho City's specific concerns over the latest alternatives of the proposed Specific Plan. Major concerns regarding the,latest alternatives are as follows: 1. The overall density of each alternative is high given site 'constraints and rural character of the area in spite of our previous comments on the adverse impact of the development density on the adjoining property. 2. The intensity of apartawmts, townhouses, commercial development (in Alternatives Ora and Two) and smell lot homes in the southern one -third of the property would not be " compatible with the half -acre lots south of ' the project site in Roncho Cucamonga. It would also establish an undesirable image and precedent for future development on the surrounding properties. ' + � CITY COW "*TIFF REPORT f NWMU Rim. ,PECIFIC PLAN January 21, 1907 Page 4 3. 'Estate' lots,- parks and schools and low density single -fatly lots are preferable in the southern one -third of the property to provide a better land use and density transition to the half -acre lots south of Smelt Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. 4. The Specific Plan s. ould be consistent with the County and local plans and yrogras for the area, such as the Nest valley. Foothill - Casmlties Plan, Etivanda Specific Plan, West Valley Foothills Community Plan Equestrian Trail Systa, and Foothill Hazard Protective Overlay District. S. Proposed street standards for major internal arterial and collector roads are inalnedpau M and whiff am should dequat�im handle design standards projected traffic for the area. 6. Cherry Avenue should be upgraded to major arterial standards between the project entrance and I -15. 7. Suamlt Avenue and Duncan Canyon Road should be upgraded from the western boundary of the x project to the future freeway intersection i east of :he project site. A study for' the improvement of these roads should be made available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for review. S. The Specific Plan should review and evaluate the West Valley Foothill Commities Plan proposal for an east -west collector road aligned with Coyote Canyon Road and the ,1 planned Duncan Canyon access to I -15 in relation to the project. 9. Circulation issues generated by the project should be studied to conjunction with nearby i. projects, particularly the developeent imeedtately vest of San S•avalna wash. CITY CODICIL STAFF REPORT f HURTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN g January 21, 1967 Page 5 10. The City of Fontana should coordinate with the County to develop a =star circulation plan for the area. The project should be related to the =star plan. 11. The County Flood Control District should thoroughly evaluate the proposal and the Hawker- Crawford Channel should be concrete lined to the project boundary. 3 y ' 12. The project desiggnn should consider site constraints and limitations presented by natural hazards such as slope stability, flooding, seismic conditions, wind turbulance, and wild land fire. 13. Preservation and sensitivity to existing natural features, land fora, and historic , features on the site should be considered, particularly in regard to grading and preservation of -=bUre vegetation such as " Eucalyptus trees. 14. Equestrian traits should be located adjacent to San Sevaine wash connecting Summit Avenue to the northern utility corridor:, v' 15. Maintenance provisions must be provided for landscaping and trails along the perimeter of the proj -t, particularly on Summit Avenue. ' 16. As part of the EIR process, in addition to the City of Fontana's preferred alternative, two more land use alternatives with substantially lower densities should be provided for consideration. The density distribution should consider the natural constraints of the site, surrounding land uses cnd the I -15 Freeway. The EIR must also conWer the growth - inducing impacts of M! proposal. 17. Recau,e of the quality of the natural x environment and constraints of the topography, should any residential development he planned ::. for the upper one -third of the property? In this context the following concerns need to be " addresssed: .n :a t .P M�l Y 4 r r. i' i' a P t L a _ y; CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HWTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN January 21, 1961 Page 6 o Adequacy of the upper cul -de -sac road for public safety. o Excessive grading which appears to be necessary to accomodate the proposed land u1e. o Impact of grading on San Sevaine Creek and its environs. o The loss of a unique opporbmity for public open space. o Significance for wildlife habitat. o Relationship to the Raticnal Forest. o Difference between 'Scenic Open Space' and 'Development Easement' designations. 16. The proposed Sand use alternatives lack sensitivity �o natural features, such as topography, natural drainage system, wildlife habitat and vegetation. 19. The Specific Plan should provide ups show the project in the context of surrounding lend uses. F. Alternative Two, with incorporation of the following changes, and /or concerns, is the least onercus of the three: 1. Reduce the overall density in the southern one -third of the property to the level acre compatible with the rural character of the surrounding area. 2. Provide a lost density residential area and additional open space along Summit Avenue to serve as a transition and buffer between the proposed development and the Very Low Residential designation south of Summit Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. ■ CITY CGWCIL STAFF`REPORT, HURTERS RIDGE SPEOFIC PLAN January 21, 1987 Page 7 1 3. Eliminate apartments along the I -15 Freeway. 4 Provide adequate equestrian facilities and improvements in and or adjacent to the upper utility easement. The facilities should be an integral part of the regional trail- systam.. S. Provide adequate edge treatment frith open space and landscape setback along Sear, Sevaine Nash. A trail along this edge would also be appropriate. 6. An east -west route across San Sevaine Wish and the Foothills CCooamuunity Plan, Is notdcsirablo11eY C. The City should be yival an opportunity to review and ccmemt on the Envtrommntal impact Report for tho Hunters Ridge Specific Plan in accordance with the annexation settlement agnwmment between Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. For your information, reprosentatiYes from the City of Fontana and the consultant fire preparing the document, The Planning Center, will be available at the noting to provfde a presentation of the plan and respond to &M questions. tied. rte Attachmwnte: Planning Commission Staff Report - January 14, 1987 Hunters Ridge Specific Plah Executive Swory 1 J r=i J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA� STAFF REPORT DATE: January 14. 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, city Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRINTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PUW - CITY OF FONTAMA - Planning omm ss an rcv ew o an use a rna ves or the Hunters Ridge Specific Plan on 567.6 acres of land with t4 City of Fontana, located m the north side of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek, west of Devore Freeway. I. ABSTRACT: The City of Faitana is in the process of preparing a Specific Plan for Fainters Ridge (Hunt Club Property) annexed in 1985. The consultant selected to prepare the auxvment, the Planning Center. will present the latest three land use alternatives to the City Council on January 21. 1987. Prior to this date, the Planning Commission is requested to review and comment on the project. The Commission should focus their review of the alternatives on the impact of Hunters Ridgerspecific Plan Executive a to Rancho Summary iscattached A copy II. BACKGROUND: A. Previous '+aview This thetCity Council referred land use alternatives were reviewed by the Commission. Following the review, the Commission indicated none of the three alternatives was acceptablo. At that tiara, the teF u stated dtis le alternatives would be empletelyreved after further research and analysis. After a delay requested by the City of Fontana, the Planning Commission reviewed the second set of thiee alternatives on February 26, 1986. Againr theictw- stated that all three alternatives were unacceptable. Now a third set of the Use Hunters Altern ts iv has beensubmitted 9 Specific to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for review. 3� 9 ITEM R W i PUMIMIHS COIMISSIOH STAFF REPORT hLnters Ridge Specific Plan 14, 1987 January Page 2 5. Project Him The (previously Clu) foorrmerlyin the aancho Cucamonga Sphere of Hunt was Influence north of Etivande. It was annexed to the City of Fontana in; 1985. Haever, the City of Rancho <- Cucamonga has an ortunity -to comment or, the Specific- ' Plan as provided f in a settlement 4916001 with or Fontana, The agreement resulted from litigation filed by i the City upon action by LAFCO reaoving the property from the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence and amiexing it _ into the City of Fontana. tv The settlement agreement beeen Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana establishes that: 1: Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana acknowledge that the owner of the.•570 acres in the annexation area has, by a saparaie agreement with Rancho Cucammga agreed that the annexation area shall be developed at a density of no more than an average of four units per gross acre. 2. both the Cities of Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga eitually agree to permit development at densities no higher than those established by the present Mast Foothill Community Plan. 3. The City of Fontana shall require payment _ of school impact fees and any other fees which may be identified as necessary mitigation in the EIR or Specific Plan. 4. The two cities agree to cooperate Li encouraging a regional park west of the site in the area of the San Savaine Creek. S. three land use alternatives shall be presented to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council and their comments will be given 'serious consideration' by the City of Fontana. 4 t1A1 m co1NISSIOi STAFF REPMT Hunters Ridge Specific Plan January 14, 1587 Page 3 t 6. The intent is that these three land use e alternatives will be `Qualitatively' different. 7. Following the selection of one of the land use shallalprepare and complete ii n aspecificPPla Fontana its Enviro meet Impact Report. 8. Fontana shall 'solicit and seriously consider' the concerns of Rancho Cucamonga In preparation of a complete specific plan for the annexation area and an Envirarmtal Iapact Report. III. PREVIOUS CON ffS' The Planning CeNIMisfien's Courcnts on the land use alternatives previously presented can be summarized as follows: A. Hone of the alternatives presented were acceptable. B. The overall density is high given site constraints and the rural character of the area. C. The intensity of multi- faotily units along I -15 Aid commercial development will establish an undesirable precedent for future development on surrounding property and along I -15. D. Natural features of the site will be significantly altered by the plan. E. Equestrian trails should be located adjacent to San Sevaine wash. F. Improvement costs directly related to the project, but within Rancho Cucamonga. must be provided by the developer and /or the City of Fontana. G. Alternatives with larger lots along the southern boundary of the project and no commercial facilities, are least objectionable. r, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION NORTH ITEM: HUNTERS RIDGE S►ECI►IC PLAN TITLE: ►NOJECT LOCATION EXHIBIT: " SCALE: 331 PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT ° Hunters Ridge Specific Plan January 14, 1967 Page 4 i IV. SITE LOCATION AND CONSTRAINTS i' The subject prop" is a 567.6 acre north -south oriented parcel located an tlx north side of Summit Avenue, east of San Seva1M S. Creek, vest of Devore Freeway. (See Exhibit Al A number of physical constraints affect the development design of ;{ the property. A. The upper one -third of the property is a canyon in the foothills. B. The lower two - thirds of the property is a moderately K sloped alluvial fan. i p C. San Sewlne Creek and flood Plain bounds the property on the test. i D. The Hawker- Crawford flood control channel traverses the lower one -third of the property. E. Two electric utility easements divide the property into thirds. F and fault parallels the State of California utili Studies Zone which addresses seismic issues. G. The San Bernardino National Forest bounds the property to the north. H The I -lE Freeway &butts the south -west corner of the property. Y. AFFECTED LAW USE PLANS AND PROGRAMS: t In addition to the physical constraints, several local and county lend use plans and /or programs affect the development design of the property. They are: A. Meet Valley Foothills Pi&n z - The San Bernardino County Nest Valley Foothills Plan cells for the level of development in the Vest Valley "oothills area to be an extension of adJotning coemnitfes. New development slwuld be compatible with the character of the adjacent comsunitles. • 333 R"-'pt, THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY t W Y Mai Hunters Ridge OIiific srAFF Plan PORT January 14, 198 Page 5 B. Etiwnda SWIM Plan The City of Rancho CucaSmomoncrqa bounds the Property On the low ddensity single-family i residential use (1-2 dw111ngg units per acre) within the City Equestrian Overlay District. C. West Valley Foothills Equestrian Trail System The project site is within the area designated for the West for Foothills tegatedd regional west Nail ditwric. which west valley Foothills Community Plan shows two trails to crossing Ranchproperty. cca nga Equestrian OverlayaZone to the vast. D. Foothill Hazard Protection Overlay District About the upper two- thirds of the property is within the County Footh ll Hazards Protection overlay District which provides fire protection standards and regulations. anticipated Physical i u 'plans wi11eddre s d in deta1nthe Environmental la Impact Report they also influence design of the development, particularly tea density. VI. DESCRIPTION AND %MySIS OF LATEST THREE LARD USE ALTERNATIVES: The following paragraphs are a summary description and nalysis of the current land use alternatives. As used below, gross density is ofratt osits (51.6maceres),deIncluding non - residential aareas, streets, utility e_a�se�ments, flood control lands and other open residentiiera easTRA dinghstreets butdeexcluding units non- residential uses and open space. 33s ti`f It I �° '� .`.s�� G ti+L�sl1 Lc'SWIlV/rilll U V 15 NORTH CITYOF ITEM: HUNTERS MIDGE IP[slllc r41111 L, RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: �. PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: • SCALE: 1 y r� 334 ' Ir • '� k " >`p 7 . � .1` i �•y' .• .'.. J 10 l \'�f I• lfi• ... Y;Y t1 .{�T. '• .�•t�,'A 1S'M1�• "i\v" 'or ••YI• }.. L /. „w• ���. 1 • 11.1 .,.'t' I,M1O.1W •�'�� .f W1y .. °I \/ • 5. �-S �. Y>� .< } .�• Y.M. T,. {• / f,(�Y' •i�M'.F r'v�(WX> 5�f'] � •1 W wl u � .. I:�. :..t i Vii• 1. r' ��l.w'i Jr �.. f+` �� •i: )�' .h �• _ f .. OwW ..•,•. a• w a• f., \" rte, � �f lW NY�NWIW �• •, •„ 1•i �; ` � raw • .- i µZ;H It I �° '� .`.s�� G ti+L�sl1 Lc'SWIlV/rilll U V 15 NORTH CITYOF ITEM: HUNTERS MIDGE IP[slllc r41111 L, RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: �. PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: • SCALE: 1 y r� 334 ' PLAWINC COIMISSION STAFF REPORT Hunters Ridge Specific Plan January 14, 1987 Page 6 A. Alternative One (See Exhibit B) t=: Alternative One calls for creation of three from north to south separated by utility eas_ie -its. In general, this alternative is based on the concept of graduation of density from the most intense in the lower one -third of the property (commercial, multi- family and small lot single - family) to the last 1nLa,ae (estate lots and open spaces) in the upper one -third of the property. Beest This alternative proposes 2,179 units on 436 acres with an averapo density of about 5.0 units per acre. The gross density is about 3.84 units par acre. It has the second most dwelling units and Ito highest percentage of omiti -fmmily dwelling units (34.75) among the three alternatives proposed. Circulation: Access would be limited to one primary en ry v a rry Avenue and a secondary access on Duncan Canyon Road at the southeast corner of the site. This 1s the only alternative which calls for relocation of the Haater- Crawford flood control channel to the eastern boundary of the property. Ceacerms: The major disadvantage of this alternative relates to land use transition and circulation. The commercial use, apartments and townhouses at the south- west corner of the site along the Summit Avenue and San Sevaine wash would be incompatible with half -acre lots south of Suaseit Avenue. Also, it would create land use transition problem: to the possible open space amenity along San Sevalne Creek. According to the City Traffic Engineer, the circulation plan 1s inadequate because only one major exit 1s provided via Cherry Avenue. This plan would funnel almost all the project traffic into Rancho Cucamonga. According to the Foothills Ward Protection Overlay District requirement for two major access points, the circulation 1s inadequate for fire protection because It allows no through traffic. 339 r;,. r ALTERNATIVE 2 NORTH CITYOF ITEM: BUNTERS "1021 SPECIFIC PLAN RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:_ PLANNING DIVISION EXIIIBIT: c SCALE: A ?3? w! $owwn.0 WJPLAt Farm . . • � ' nuurur m, ...... sp. •�w.R'Y YI, r . ..,.. (a '• ' 1 ! d ALTERNATIVE 2 NORTH CITYOF ITEM: BUNTERS "1021 SPECIFIC PLAN RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:_ PLANNING DIVISION EXIIIBIT: c SCALE: A ?3? a: 4+ w �f 7 a . Y• t= Hunters January Page 7 !. Altaroative Two (See Exhibit C) Cwcart: Alternative Two is based on the Commify Con coK . The Proposed; loop road encloses a school, two Parks. toadquse$ and rdium- density detached hews. The Commercial site is "located at the first Wor internal intersection adjaCMt to Park /coawnity center.. Dwi This alternative calls for 2,121 units on 42( acres TM th am gross dens ty isi bout about units' upnert x� it has the lowest dwelling units and second highest, Percentage of sulti- fasily dwelling units (29.1 %) amrng the three alternatives Proposed. Circulation: Three points of access are proposed Witt, w Tn rough access via Cherry Avenue on the south through to Coyote Canyon ,load on the east of ten, Property. A secondary access is on Dtrncan Canyon Road to the southeast portion of the property. According to tho City Traffic Engineer, this alternative has the best internal circulation plan among the three alternatives. C s use sitytransition probl,ais a� c�rcial use,, townhouses and aFartwnts in the southern one -third of well as =411 6,000 square footlllots, ewnd' be incompatible with half -acre lots south of Swann. The apertstnts along the 1 -15 Freewsp would create an undesirable iaege for the runt claracter of the &roe. This alternative would set a Prect'dent for future land use and adversely affect the rural living enviromant of the area. 339 y`;r 1 i Cq, •a • L /y. •' wl pt'FII/wJUI.� el .ti if•.t A' • �1. 1 _ 1 \�•j �l �1• •\ 1 1, ••14 ,A • S �wr i Plm4w Mo.w. �w r»» qMl I /, ,; ✓ .'J•.',': :F '; 1 Ao 4SlllSlnlllVL 1U U1%� NORTH CITY OF ITEM HUNTERS 111009 SPECIFIC PLAN ,;RA3,CH0 CUCAMONGA TITLE: ' ,, ,PI:AA. xWNG DIVISION EXHIBIT: u SCALE:_. �;�� . . r. ••><Ir'!VG!ID •�wKllellpT; ��»,' {. AAl1 ,1 '. AL1 ,. j �,' rAi Y• •....wr.rh� 'S . �• '•4 1prw M •�y� w u.wam• »r EZI Al.• Plm4w Mo.w. �w r»» qMl I /, ,; ✓ .'J•.',': :F '; 1 Ao 4SlllSlnlllVL 1U U1%� NORTH CITY OF ITEM HUNTERS 111009 SPECIFIC PLAN ,;RA3,CH0 CUCAMONGA TITLE: ' ,, ,PI:AA. xWNG DIVISION EXHIBIT: u SCALE:_. �;�� . . r. -- f..'um 'TAF�FM MRT Hunters R1dga 5teciffe . ';• "' Page nuar 14:.19!, C. Three Alternative — (5ce fixhiDft W t• Like' an of tare One, Alternatfre Three also Ut s ova erection of three the! c�enteMesewnts. The schwl'p^rkh��ls located at aL Unlike the.,othe�bn�jternativedThr% proposes comercial site. no AeMSftr•• Alternatfvo Three proposes 2.232 units on 429 acres Nth an - average density of about 5,2 units per It F Ms The gross density Is ebout 3.93 units par acre. Most duailing units ar,d the highn.t density Perce The three alternattres, However, it has the lohest Percentage of mltf- fanfly units M.6%), Oircelatfee: The circulation pattern of Alternative ree oInts r to that Of Alternative Tbo, It Proposes three points of access in the sere areas a Altenative Tho• According to the Proposed loop roads wouldCcause Traffic ern Pe lrrs. •° CeAOeTMS' Ins dfsadvantsge of this alternative is the orzra city, The overaTt dens gghh rural character rf the area. Lfk fAlternatire�Two the 15t Free of 2P&rbents and shall lot units along the I- preeedentt for futv re dereifsh an Undesirable 110090 and opernt on surrounding property. ,a The positivr eleeent under this alternative is that no ccererctal site is proposed. t - T ..il • cy � � a3i AN REPORT YII. StvattlT W FIMINGS AM C �i OWERRS Fat LATEST THREE LA)p USE A• R? Wa1f4� t1arodce Pattern h �ersefativTh�ar, t qualltatfvelY different all similar in land use y 1. Land ty - =s In general the alternative land �s� patterns of all three nedecrease of danvfv fro southth to norcept of tg Ii bq lyIs , into brae segeents or of land use Patti for t�Ac ��e�n as tS found andthDp� situ i d Iaw den :i Identical. found in U� sou 0°e- hlyd 1n �)10 LSrae alt=rnatives. ° C0°°erefal si4 to thorn °"° -third includes family towMousesli�atlVes tkie rnd Two. fatly hones are located along it lot sfnyle_ alto attwesr5 Freeway in all thh OF ue 2. Dens1 y In density and unit cnun;, alternatfves are alruni identical. L1e three 2,232, The 9unit count 3 rant 3.93 gross Per ?. ?32, ranges frao ?,121 per 3. Cir`u-- -.l�o�cance t Plan to It Lo cfrculatlon concept plan, Altoraattves alterna ivas Tee are very stellar• zite.a All aprte°P)a' yoln a Dalnts of access prfaa All three al4rnativre9h the Protect additl�onajnrculatton ff �+saft Avenue, for VIII, following.) cu+cerrts, see Seen on 3 Y•1 PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT Hunters Ridge Specific Plan January 14, 1987 Page 10 B. Comparison to Alternatives Previously Reviewed The currant three alternatives are very similar to the previous reviewed that the density has I creased asa isslan except follows: October 1985 1705 - 2141 dwelling units February 1986 1930 - 2076 dwelling units Current 2121 - 2232 dwelling units in spite of previous cam ants by the Planning Commission that the density is too high given site constraints and the rural character of the area, Cie proposed density of the current alternatives has lncressed. C. Level and Character of Development None of the three alternatives is consistent with the land use directive of the Pest valley Foothill Plan. For that is an of adjoining communities and also direects new development to be compatible with the character of adjacent communities. The three land use alternatives submitted do not reflect these land use guidelines. VIII. CIRCULATION CONCERNS Although circulation issues will be addressed in detail at the Environmental Review phase, circulation also affects project design and jensities at the alternative selection stage. A traffic study prepared by Nilidan Associates indicates that 75% to 83% of the project traffic will travel south on Cherry Avenue through Rancho Cucamonga. Although future access to the I -15 Freeway is planned at the Coyote Canyon /Duncan Canyon Road intersection, Cherry Avenue is the only access to the freeway now. Although according to plans, Summit Avenue /24th Street will be improved to arterial status in the future, Highland Avenue is the nearest east -west travel route at this time. Therefore, it is likely that most of the project traffic will use the Cherry Avenue route, necessitating off -site improvements for Cherry Avenue in conjunction with development of the Hunters Ridge project. This and other concerns are summarized below: A. According to the preliminary traffic study for the project, Cherry Avenue will need to be improved, at a minimum, to secondary arterial standards between the racoeomiends Cherry to be upgradoda t i i majjorf arterial.. r , t, 35/3 r 3 i . _r OMISSION STAFF REPORT Hunters January Page 11 O. Additional off -site improvements will be necessary on Snit Avenue god Duncan Canyon Road from the western intterseecction last of the project site. future freeway C. Construction of off -site street improvements in Rancho Cucamonga, dir -ctly related to the Hunters Ridge project is a primary concern and should be a part of the pQect. D. Circulation issues need to be studied in conjunction with nearby projects, particularly the potential development immediately west of San Sevaine wish. E. east -was t ycol lector�iradCommunities for with Coyote Canyon Road and the planned Duncan Canyon access to I -15. This be reviewed specific Plana has fa relation iled to address this issue. F. Internal street design criteria used by the Hunters Ridge project is inadequate. Specifically, the travel lanes for major arterial road: (24 feet pavement each way) and collector roads (24 feat pavement two -ray, curb ae a emi�fr projected traffic according to our City Tafffiic Engineer. IX. DRAINAGE CONCERNS Engineering staff alternatives v concluded th?reject is a d ainagecac ptwhich is wre r less iar for all the three alternatives. TM proposal will iryact Coii drainage vap Flood mostly Or strict should thoroughly the proposal. As a par. o iw C Improvement ppl D paredbythe County, a debrisdam isproposedaat the nhof San Sevaine Canyon which may have some impact on the northerly area of the project. The —CitY of Fontana and /or the developer should work with the Flood Control District to address this issue. 3yy X. E. P""LANNWING COMISSZO N STAFF REPORT Ridge Januar 14 07ectflc Plan Page 12 lgef Crawford Cho ja is concerned eh the treatment of for Alternative) Shand PrOPOsed to be kept in a natunl�satate charnel for Alternative d rein i 1 1nsntanc�s li Impact On the dMM tnam 9ned unimproved City area, due to erost reach of the channel s, t wfll have an debris deposttfon. on of the channel bottom and the rses the will thus be Adversely Future lmprovaaaMt of this downst resulting be concrete lined through to Staff suggests that reach a Projart boundary. Chan PROPOSED RESPONSE TO 1HE CITY OF !"TANA Staff has prepared the concerning cp the land usefollowing response to the City of Fontana SPacffic plan; rnatives for the Wnters Ridge A' Uoew of the three land use alternatives 1s acceptable. R � alternatives an rat 'tqualitatively different- between t do not reflect thhee intent of the a bet�o �a two cities. and 9reement C. Rand of the Lira alternatives is consistent with land us" directives of the West Valley Foothillhs Plan. For exaople, th Plan Calls for a level of development that is extension of adjoining comatibles and also directs new development to 6e compatible w� th the character o/ adjacent be emminfro le ree land use alto do not reflect these land use 9ufdelfe�stives submitted 0. �iitthinemRen costs'directly related to the Project, but derel Ra O Cuc&xM%4- most be pU' Pro by the iaprov irterfaeir etw`rovmO t of Cherry A"A. Major fi arterial between the VroJectry Avenue to a Wor ement of rit Avenue andentranoe and I -15, from the western boundary of Duncan Canyon Road control freeway intersection east the ite to the resulting from alit Samdit Avenue and to the South Channel. gnment of the Hawker - CrawPnrd In addition to the above PoM O ff, the City of Fontana Should consider he concerns over the latest alternatives af�he Proposed SPaclflc Plan. 3yr Mont" 41* $$'ON SiAFF Pag13 14, A6� ffie ►la "T S. 6. 10 foNlilovs.r e °nee'^s regarding the 1 L overall A- latst alternatfves are as f giv of site of each chap ious eonstrafnts t tiro is and the previous nttsdensityy Adverse o �apact our 2. The fntansi djoining coNwrcfai b of *Par �� man ��1°iPtie^rrootppee- sAin L LowMous� the Mt the Naif rK voald no;hetn be and could also St blfsh Mncho south f ,R Rd P Zt Properties. deY�sf for rutu 3. a oMnLeo Es n ge density sIn is t Tots the ide tare * -fW'ly lots aschools and lov trans iti a better lyd of the P able in the t Avenue in hncho� re lo dad W #aSf V 4. The the C-0eeMe PI 94. the ana4sand local plan po�unitf as the and roar Mth Most Vaal Plan. Etiv nst Vail, Foot for iz EWestrfa aryal ostblls �ifie P)an, Proteetfve overlay Nee - andFa+unflty Pla Ardttertfa str oljtsnderds for stands should or for art internal Proleet tr is for be to the esl arterial e Avenue should entrance a Standards ad �twi am mio Project ■ K MIRO COIMISSIGM STAFF REPORT Hunters Ridge Specific Plan January 14, 1987 Page 14 7. Suit Avenue and Duncan Canyon Road should d' be upgraded iron the western boundary i,f the project to the future freeway intersection east of the project site. A study for the improvement of these roads should be made available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for review. S. The Specific Plan should review and evaluate the West Valley Foothill Comannities Plan proposal 'for an east -west collector road ` aligned with Coyote Canyon Road and the o planned Duncan Canyon access to I -15 in relation to the project. 9. Circulation issues generated by the project should be studied in conjunction with nearby particularly o de vjelc immediately west San Sevaine wash. 10. The City of Fontana should coordinate with the County to develop a master circulation for e project should be lat to wester p 11. The County Floo@ Control District should thoroughly evaluate the Proposal and the n Hawker-Crawford Channel should be concrete lined to the project boundary. ' 12. The project design should consider site 1 constraints and limitations presented by natural hazards such as slope stability, flooding, seismic conditions, wind ` turbulence, and wild land fire. 13. Preservation dnd sensitivity tO existing natural features, land forms, and historic features on the site should be considered, particularly in regard to grading and preservation of mature vegetation such as Eucalyptus trees. 14. Equestrian trails should be located adjacent to San Sevaine wash connecting Summit Avenue rx to the northern utility corridor. PLAMMIN CCMi1ISSI8M'•STAPF REPORT Hinters Ridge Specific Plan January 14,•19677 Page 15 Y ;a 15. Maintenance provisions must be provided for landscaping and trails along the perimeter Of the project, particularly on Suomdt Avenue. d' F. The City should be given an oppertunity to review and comment on the D.vI Mew tal fgact Report for the Hunters Ridge Specific Plan in accordance with the N annexation settlement agreement between Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. XI. RECOPPOWTIC 1 •, The Planning CreaHssion should review the proposed alternatives as they relate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the proposed response and rotor it to the City Council by minute - action for their review on January 21, 1987. 4Resully s <ttt"d er City P1 nner 88:RT:te Attachments: Hunters Ridge Specific Plan Executive Summary y M !3- UBM 16 ww am �w HUMIrEpto 22 23 .......... S ........... Lis Lu co lvc_ Rot~ I -27 - ----- Ga-g'M&% 26 it N [PGE SP ECIFAIC PLAN .......... . A VECU'Tlyk! OF ':--^L GILFILLAN a rt tz, i Ma l CITY or roWANA RoNTERS RIDGE SPECIPIC PLAN EXECUTIVE SoNNARr October 27, 1906 TOE PLANNING CENTER 240 Newport Canter Drive Suits 215 Newport Beach, CA 92660 e4 1 q� L l f rJ c 8 S� i .i` a i ti i i 1 a n PXECgTIVE SUMMARY TABLE Of CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. PROJECT SETTING 2 III. OWNERSHIP 2 I.,. BACKGROUND 2 V. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 Exhibit: Regional 3 VI. KEY ISSUES 4 VII. COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ALTERNATIVES 6 A. Roads Exhibits Primary Project Entry 7 Exhibits Elevation of Primary Project Entry 8 Exhibits Major Arterial P.oad /Divided 9 Exhibits Cherry avenue Plan /Lineal Parkway 10 Exhibits Chorry Avenue Plan /Cul- de-Sac Access to Parkway 11 Exhibits Collector Road 12 Exhibits Loca) Road 13 B. Community Structure and Facilities Exhibits Community Facilities Plan 14 Exhibit: Equestrian Facility and Interpretive Park is o Park Requirements 16 C. Flood Control Exhibits Hawker Crawford Channel Section 17 Exhibits San Sevaine Nash Edge Treatment/ ' Equestrian Easement 18 VIII. ALTERNATIVE SITE UTILIZATION CONCEPTS 19 A. Alternative 1 19 Exhibit 21 B. Alternative 2 22 Exhibit 24 C. Alternative 3 24 Exhibit 27 IX. EVALUATION OF ALTERWATIVES 28 ' 3S/ ■ s rMrROCOMi.0 TAIs Cxe ` Planni °olive SuMnar the � lasfon in Kakis been' Prepared revt into unto 9 °sSPeci a de os C to ai•i�t. tote +Rid utlllsatlo n +s2ec th otfScIs by Lac Clcylot X10 iflcrtl alte�CeThePlan° one tun the clrculatton Patto n �ePt v112•ia�° PDolnt�ent cApie��lve° to areas C edweloAiinbe lPrc �ar�tusec�.ln °rom *rolelia� oP useacand natives to Ya ant lionson c an ncho Cucaeo °led •c thre7 ° follovihe Yelattonahie aelactlnq �At,thadpiiinn!! vorksholn t frstoa+Wonerwlelte i nth t rec h th the P Prefer np Coyii+ t th real cM�antirerrad Alto tiv ternativa for he Ci y olo��nda- ° tO the Citp ounclr to Present The +election o a Of a final writ t _PrKe 1 to obtain Dro�eaelo t Dhaa 0aet Preferred MBb a•terna'CV Pte eftou n of Ph Onetvo- e: +Ares!, thescu Paratlo 1. teak° of thi°PPhe+i 1 by tha ner elves awe result effort tr ro the Task T.tak hbi k They Brat oducts dw 1 DdeinaleM1 cm our Task oreas b'pentatchpReport urt P al Rame e Sary The second Port c Integrated on anal 1ticndovtllolnthl° Preferred !nt market atudyn�nidr � ilf LD et and design Prop • On Pact report (EIR), and lanretln d - - e I II. PROJECT LOCATION Tha Hunters Ridge site is located three miles vast of Lytle Creek at the base of the lover slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains in the northwestern corner of the City of Fontana. Summit Avenue and O. S. Interstate Highway 15 (Devore Free- way) form the southern property boundary, and San Sevaine Creek runs along the western boundary. To the east the -- property adjoins cultivated fields and the Rich Basin, and to the north the property merges with the San Bernardino National Forest. The site is adjacent to other regional jurisdictions including the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the south and the County of San Bernardino to the vast. The proposed Foothill Freeway will lie south of the property adjacent to Highland Avenue. Its relationship to the region is depicted or. the Regional Location Exhibit. III. OWNERSHIP n First City Properties owns the property (570 acres). IV. BACKGROUND The project site (also known as Annexation Area No. 114), in accordance with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) settlement agreement between the City of Fontana and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, was annexed into the City of Fontana in 1985. As part of the settlement agreenent the residential dwelling yield for the property was established at a density of no more than HL-Att'The maximum dwelling unit count was c- a cu a i as 'folrowat 570 acres x 4 d.u. /ac. yield. To achieve this a General Plan Anandment s rs ,u red. As a condition of this agreement the City of Fonta�la agreed to prepare a Specific Plan and E1R for this property. V. ERIGTING CONDITIONS Y The property is vacant with the exception of the old Hunt Club and one homesite located just north of the easement co Southern California Edison Company for transmission lines. Significant features of the site include the San Sevaine Canyon and Creek$ Bullock Canyon and Creeks and the ruins of the old San Sevaine house, winery and watering pond. An expanse of the San Gabriel Mountains alluvial fan is quite distinct topographically, while the Alquist- Priolp Specific Studios Zone passes through the upper portion of the site along the Cucamonga Fault. 2 .. .. . -1 1 -1 -. - VI.- MY ISSUES Several key issues have been identified below as important considerations in the planning and design of the site. All of these issues have bun evaluated in a preliminary manner by the consultant team. More detailed analysis will occur for the selected 'Preferred alternatives- during the Phase Two procsss sa market and fiscal impacts are refined, design guidelines are developed, and an EIR is prepared. 1• Flood Control - Ths Hawker Crawford Channel traverses the site re the east from north to south, and the San Sivaine Creek and its levee border the property to the west ovidin mayor drainages Yrae the mountein. reg one study by Sills Minn and As tin As sociates evaluated in be incorporated as part of this specific plan. 2. Utility Easements - Two mayor electrical tranmixsion lines, operated by SCE and the Department of Water and Power traverse the site. Their relationship to development is addressed in the alternatives. 3. Historic Sites - The ruins or the San Sraine house and winery, and a house built In 1918 exist on the property today. A cultural and palecntological. resource survey has been undertaken to evaluate theme sites and they, have been addnssad in the alternatives. 4. Equestrian Facility - A regional equestrian /hiking trail is identified in the We3C Valley Foothills Community the western additl on, an equestrian L cilityfOnhthe roper In ty service this trail is addressed in the alternatives, to S. Estate Lots - The location, size and number of large residential estate lOt3 overlooking the city has been addressed In the alternatives. 5. Market - Regional and local market trends have been 'evaluated to Insure that the land u3e mix and market orientation of the plan 18 supportable. Since Hunters Ridge Is outside the Redevelopment Area a totally documented market study was not required. Upon Planning Commisslcn's selection of a preferred alternative the market report will be refined along with a final fiscal impact report. 7. Seismic Caults - The Cucamonga fault zone passaj through the upper portion of the property. The faults are Primarily in the utility easements and residential uses are setback from this area in all alternatives. 4 t =, M--" r S• The preliminary traffic impacts of the on erry Avenue and the Devote (I -15) Freeway haveobeen altern ive further nsnrlysiss will tbe undertakenreintthe EIR. 9• �arery• The preliminary infrastructure needs of t e project have been analyzed and will be refined as Part of the Specific Plan process in Phase Two for the preferred alternative. In addition a Data identification and Obligation■ Inventory will be cunducted to identify who is to do what, at what cost, when and to what standards. 10. 4W The three alternative development ncepts have boon prepared to offer alternative choices in community idontity and character. 11. Land Uses - The type of land uses, their location, relationship and intensity are addressed in the three alternative concepts. �� tG e � 'µ i VII. COMMGN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ALTEPHATIM All three alternatives have certain common land use and design characteristics. These common characteristics/as- sumptions are present to some degree In all alternatives and may be described ant A• ROADS (See Exhibits) • Primary project entry Off Summit Avenue • Major arterial road, divideds 110' R.O.N. • Collector Street: 64' R.O.N. • Local Streets 60' R.O.N. H. COMMUNITY FACILITIES (See Exhibits) o An •Equestrian Facility and Interpretative Park- to link together the following elements (See Exhibit) 1. An equestrian facility (corrals, horse trailer parking, group picnic area and restroons) 2. The historic San Sevaine house, winery and reservoir 3. The 191E house (re).)catsd to above upper easement) 4. An Interpretative trail tour connecting the San Sevaine house, winery and reservoir to the upper 1918 bouts Interpretive displays /exhlbits and the cquestrlan facility. 5. An equestrian /hiking trail linkage to the regional trail o A lineal parkway within the major arterial right of way /scenic treatment o Scenic open space to the north (39.4 ac.) over 201 slope 0 20' landscape setback along Summit Avenue 0 30" landscape setback along Devote Freeway o One elementary school (10 acres) C. FLOOD CONTROL (See Exhibits) o Westerly levee and San Savalne Neslt Edge Treatment (location to be determined by Flood Control study) 0 801 R.O.W. Hawker - Crawford flood control channel (determined by Flood Control Study) D. DWELLING UNITS (See Alternatives) 0 32 Estate lots to the north (minimum) 0 Maximum dwelling unit yield must be below 2280 d.u. Exhibits have been prepared to illustrate these common characteristics in the fallowing pages. 3s2 <5"v =i�Nti Y4. 7AVjAVV3HO 0 W $Q � rW QOQ i �t a. W r s d v ■ IACK ■ 3.r, 3 ol . sc° J a O a .a r A D Q O J Q r W H a O a 0 W 6� WpO U< N Hl �r�C) 0 '< O ; t) a< 3 u�i U$ t yp S i , 5o6$ C <Y< O� JCL X G � W ypyp�� %I.. L �c�i � Y �0 � 0 g 0 ua o �+F I.. ' tt a e w z W _ > W U W O h U ?g?g w a 0 d m V L•, V J!r 1; io z° Ple y0 2 Co } F-' al J' a; o, a; 3j 3i am CD LUz <z yZLU 0 Z < J 12 C Q cc cc O U W J O U ' b r,M1 + y^ ( • { o � } � 2 z 3 § r- \ / W \ . CL � J Q V - $ 7 ■ \ ©�z�y ƒ . z- ;, , 3roy . /A t i� `• +° � :etel !� ` t(% I: t •�nnt.� d i +iWr�„l��A � f ��i ,p. •fir`.` 'wv��� Lr� + {3 t•a• �,. \•• l�rr .),t.y'L�♦ slyp:�� Mii� +� �I4 \pI w.•' +•> \!.7 .i , .1 _ ..:� ����CCCC[ vt %f���% "�.�1 \+•4:�A ;AJy�,�%:�\'1 i „r � i .. :. •:� 7•.ry ��• YYj �•. �TIy °��y1�� t Ile FACLM J 11 •,1� •��\�� A.S' .. •, •\ + %•`. •j /11111' •'�; aw wFi�wlyl:A „ •, - rww y dL .wwrr.��..rrw. •• 'L •ir:r+ t.. s _ �.rwrrrrr.rr pT �• \•• f•: ' e� ��,,..+bEllML'.•.:>}: r.rrrwrr.ur..w \L r•r�.�. r. +rr�. • •tilyl i � SSA ADA%CWrmi•rp..00lr+y...err f .• 1 ulrlr •�' i I _ r�r r:u IIIOCAte YMiRY UMW ', 1 % 1' I 1'6 •r YwrrrM1r6rwrr�• ''� •�.�\ :• \I',• � rlr r•rwrr�rl0•IViwi )Si.. '.J C pti• •...rr.rrr •� ' t.� _ rywwur r.r...wr t.. •C •^'� �7��C �� �V ,•.. ,yl: • , _Y • •rr•" Yrw•�.r \r Wrrrll HUNTERS I A sPECM PL" PREPARED BY THE t" ' RLX CITY OF FCW" 14 3Gt 1 rf, NOME ON PARK RI()UIRIMINTS% All three alternatives propose park land that Satisfies the miunimm park requirement for each alternative. These figures era prepared to compare alternatives and will be finalized upon selection of a preferred alternative. A. FORMULA The requirements for Park Open Space by the City of Fontana are derived from City Ordinance 832. The formula to be used is a0 follows% o Single family detached% 3.0 ac. (2.96 people x d.u.$) No, people - o Multi family attached% 3.0 so. (1.60 Dsople x d.u.$) I 60P LO B. APPLIED TO ALTERNATIVES ALT. I ALT. 2 ALT. 3 s. F. Units 1421 1501 1705 M. P. Units 758 620 527 Total • ng Unitas 2179 2121 2232 o Park required (by formula) 16.25 ac. 16.3 ac. 17.67 ac. C. PARR 1.CREAOE PROVIDED C i ALT. 1 ALT. 2 ALT. 3 a. Park 8.0 10.1 8.8 b. Equestrian facility/ Interpretive Park 9.0 9.0 9.0 c. Lineal Parkway /110' R.O.N. Parkway Credit 1.5 2.1 2.7 'r A. Improved Easement (501 credit) 0 11.0 0 TMU POTENTIAL PAM CREDIT u 33.5 20.50 TOTAL PARK REQUIREMENT 16.25 16.3 17.67 tr OVER (UNDER) REQUIREMENT 2.25+ 19.2+ 2.83+ 4� ' `1? 4 ■i VP � � @� � \ � � � @� � \ � BY . i , '01 . ...... I I uj ut 2's n. ne 2 I t a V VIII. ALTERNATIVE SITE UTILISATION CONCEPTS ALTERNATIVE. 1 Plan Peaturem • Public easements unimprovadN utilized to separate alto Into thirds and create three neighbonccods • Hawker - Crawford Channel relocated to eastern boundary to provide contiguous developable land in lower Portion of site. • Short ■a or arterial, no through traffic c into • te. Cherry and Sumit Avenues, limits • At terminus of arterial a spatial open environment made with school and park • Loop roacs off of major arterial to create inward sense of neighborhood • Highest density to southwest corner of site • Medium density to middle and east of site (78200 a.f. +) • Low density to top and north (large estate lots) • Most estate lout 71 d.u. • Highest percentage of multi - family dwelling units - 34.7% (7SO d.u.) • Lowest percentage of single family dwelling units 6S.3% (1421 d.u.) 0 83% attached units are townhouses 0 661 detached units ara on lots of 7200 S.C. or larger o Smallest lot to 6000 S.C. o 16% detachae "nits are on lots of 10,000 S.C. or larger 0 S1 detached units are 1.0 acre plus o Second most dwelling unite, 2179 d.u. C i • ALTERNATIVE 1 - DWELLING LOT SINGLE FAMILY ' GLOSS Dan. _Lot Type Acre % DU /AC D.V. t D.U. Al 1.0 + ac. 126.4 22.2 1.0 71 3.3 ' A2 10,000 -1.0 ac. 43.0 7.6 3.5 150 6.9" B1 7,200 -9,999 144.4 25.3 5.0 723 33.2 B2 6,000 -7,199 79.5 14.0 6.0 477 21.9 ti x Subtotals ec. --- MULTI FAMILY Cl Tovnhomss 24.9 4.4 16.0 398 18.21 C2 Apartments 18.0 3.2 20.0 360 16.51 Su tote s sc. 7.61 - - -- TOTAL DWELLING UNITS 2179 D.O. PARE AND OPEN SPACE • Park 8.0 • Lineal Parkuay 1.5 ' • Public Easement 54.5 t' Improved Easement 0 $conic Open Space 39.4 • Equestrian/ Interpretive Park 9.0 Landscape Setback --- Development (49.1) Easement Subtotal: sc• V • Park credit (assumes equestrian facility (8.0 ac.) and historic site (1.0 ac.)) OTHER School 10.0 Commercial 4.0 Major Arterial Road 7.8 .• su cote t ac. 3.3% - t�+ .r- TOTAL ACRES 570.7 ac. 100.01 ''. 'a ar -+• ,3•. Rey ..... Gars ,. �• i'n`��1„• .t lot- ��i�x'•4�e'?F • r _ Irn,•i•'d ..�f `)��"i:1T�P1 Y - 0 isI '^' tj••e`I w�•t tI�J�••�`•I iy•M f.r ; , �•�D IyY 1 P x»I Wn. Vie». aw mud S. t t • ;•t t I. t ;� •:t Y �. t{ .. 1a�.� Ff V {\ i r•�. 4 i.v' •., til '.� •'•r •y Iv ...u..w •IIt ;• .t.ra : i� ,y.1.J ..�.ti yS!•I�,t�t° p . Y. ..• •r» r.1.: Ir Y• •�.1�• ••k •olJ4 : .. r. •V'�' S• j•� =�i� (• �'Zr"A p xr .». rs•u.w r1 ul IM I r. L. . �.. S4dd Iv »II c N .Iwrw t •. f •IaCYMM•'A� 1y.•� IL•u . r �r 11.1 p II YI {Y \IIY 1» r� A SPECIFIC PLAN F�JNT�RS • ��•� RIDGE I,PREPAREDBYTHE crry OF FONTANA �- T 2l _ 3rJ�- 1: 1• t • !• l .. 1a�.� Ff V {\ i r•�. 4 i.v' •., til '.� •'•r •y Iv ...u..w •IIt ;• .t.ra : i� ,y.1.J ..�.ti yS!•I�,t�t° p . Y. ..• •r» r.1.: Ir Y• •�.1�• ••k •olJ4 : .. r. •V'�' S• j•� =�i� (• �'Zr"A p xr .». rs•u.w r1 ul IM I r. L. . �.. S4dd Iv »II c N .Iwrw t •. f •IaCYMM•'A� 1y.•� IL•u . r �r 11.1 p II YI {Y \IIY 1» r� A SPECIFIC PLAN F�JNT�RS • ��•� RIDGE I,PREPAREDBYTHE crry OF FONTANA �- T 2l _ 3rJ�- 1: a ALTMMTIV6 Y - Plan Features ' o Major arterial serves as community link to Duncan Canyon Road through project 0 Loop road off major arterial encloses school, two ' parks, townhouses and detached nomos to create o community core Community core links lower and middle third, and o public easement _ 11 School and adjacent park placed on public easement in`,, -, middle of site to add improvod open space to school .. ` and connect to trail systems Commercial ■iti at first major Intersection adjacent . >= o to park to create community center " o Major green spaces, a goal along North Fontana s .. roadways, are provided first at entry, then at pa *k at ' the first major intersection, then as an improved green public easement next to park and school grounds, of and finally a landscaped entry at northwestern edge o the project. Loop road keeps local traf9ic off major arterial o Jogging trall and bike path circles the community core and connects to surrounding land uses. for interior - o Minimizes amount of grading necessary lots and roads by siting them parallel to existing o grade more often. Lowest density to western and northern portions of _ •� o site Moderate density to southern and eastern portions 'of r% o 0ite Highest donsity in center or along freeway to - - o southeast Attached units are 29.11 of total (620 d.u.) . 0 62.91 of attached units (390 of 6201 are townhouses - - and will be don igned to city sale standards o 211 of detached units are 10,000 s.f. lots or large: o 701 of detached units are on 7,200 a.F. lots or larger o Smillest lots are 6,000 s.f. (gross) o Lowest dwelling unit yields 2121 d.u. " a • Park Credit (assumes equestrian facility (8.0 ac.) and historic site (1.0 ac.)) OTHER School 10.4 1.8 Commercial 4.6 .8 Major Arterial Road (110' Row) 12.2 2.1 ' Subtotals ac TOTAL 568.9 ac 1001 23 . 1 ^� C .. r. ALTERNATIVE 2 i� DWELLING LOT SINGLE FAMILY Gross Lot Gross Den. Lot Type Range Acre 1 DU /AC D.U. 1 D.U. r' Al Lot 1.0 + ac 87.1 15.3 1.0 32 1.5 A2 Lot 10,000 -1.0 ac 80.1 14.1 3.5 280 13.2 B1 Lot 7,200 -9,999 147.8 26.1 5.0 739 35.0 1 82 Lot 6,000 -7,199 75.1 13.1 6.0 450 21.2 ' Subtotals 390.1 ac. 68.6t - -- 1501 d.u. 70.9% MULTIPLE FAMILY Cl Lot T.H. 24.4 4.3 15.0 390 18.4 C2 Lot Apart. 11.5 2.1 20.0 230 10.7 ey su tote s 35.9 ac. 6.4% - -- .u. TOTAL DNELLING UAITS 2121 D.O. PARR AND OPEN SPACE ' Park 10.1 1.8 • Lineal Parkway 2.4 .4 Public Easement 26.8 4.7 ' Improved Easement 28.0 5.0 (501 Park Credit 14.0 ac.) Scenic Open Space 39.4 6.9 • Equestrian/Inter- pretive Park 9.0 1.6 w Landscape Setback Development Easement (49.1) u tote s 115.7 ac • Park Credit (assumes equestrian facility (8.0 ac.) and historic site (1.0 ac.)) OTHER School 10.4 1.8 Commercial 4.6 .8 Major Arterial Road (110' Row) 12.2 2.1 ' Subtotals ac TOTAL 568.9 ac 1001 23 . 1 ^� r S M UVAM WAAH. P r ci • � •t jd •.r 1 S r . ,I DGE 1•: /S ..v ••• • d � wY�ufnw S M UVAM WAAH. P r ci • � •t jd •.r 1 S r . ,I DGE •�1 i i . G=dLiLLL�,ll1SlIV4i1� :RS • A SPECIFIC PLAN �ay jPAEPARED BY THE _— �C17Y OF FON- /ANI •4_ 24 34r Q«r r:IwTY.Vlr.rl ••• • d � wY�ufnw �•/ .al .r' .Iti /4i NM �. Y M %�• .Z ry,�,..t Nr w lu Nrlr •�1 i i . G=dLiLLL�,ll1SlIV4i1� :RS • A SPECIFIC PLAN �ay jPAEPARED BY THE _— �C17Y OF FON- /ANI •4_ 24 34r Q«r r:IwTY.Vlr.rl 1 Y a3 i `Y H'll M 4,: 26 +���C'•��r•6�!t"�� t:j�',,� ) y,' /, .- ,' .��L •) %4 r''Ke,�- j�.+"- .'ti�+,,��� } ti' V=; Rit`.l'k���kJ:ii6C`�l���F�'.•.. �.. �E�Y �i /: �r' ..+i t:=a :.`iu;.'.)�`4: Y• r � ~• ALTERN)1?1VN 3 in Plan Features o Major arterial serves as community link through ' project to Juncan Canyon Road o Public easements unimprovedl used to separate neighborhoods o Loop roads off arterial mad to create internal neighborhood for each third of site o Park, or school and park sited at center of �.� neighborhood on major arterial o No commercial site '•;' o Moderate grading .t' o Low density in middle /west and top portiono of site pp o Moderate density in lower and middle east and central portions of site i o High density is in eastern boundary in lower and } middle thirds of site o Lowest percentage of attached units - 23.61 (527 d.u.) o 561 attached units are townhouses o Highest percentage of detached units - 76.41 (1705 •i d.u.) o Smallest lotar 5,000 s.f. (gross) o 70% detached unite (1190) are 6,000 s.f. or larger o 301 detached units are 7,200 s.f. or larger o 151 detached units are 10,000 s.f. or lat9er o 21 detached units are 1.0 acre or larger i o Highest d.u. yields 2232 d.u. f_ 1 Y a3 i `Y H'll M 4,: 26 +���C'•��r•6�!t"�� t:j�',,� ) y,' /, .- ,' .��L •) %4 r''Ke,�- j�.+"- .'ti�+,,��� } ti' V=; Rit`.l'k���kJ:ii6C`�l���F�'.•.. �.. �E�Y �i /: �r' ..+i t:=a :.`iu;.'.)�`4: ■ ALTERNATIVE 3 DWELLING VAT SINGLE FAMILY Gross Lot Gross Den. Lot Type Range Acres 1 DU /AC D.U. 1 D. U. Al Lot 1.0 f ac 27.1 15.4 1.0 32 1.4 A2 Let 10,000 -1.0 ac 64 11 3.5 224 10.2 B1 Lot 71200 -9,999 77.8 13.7 S.0 389 17.4 82 Lot 6,000 -7,199 90.8 16 6.0 545 24.4 B3 Lot 5,000 -5,099 79.3 14 6.5 515 23 u tote [ 399.0 ac. 70M - -- 1703 d.u. 76.4% MULTIPLE FAMILY C1 Lot T.H. 18.3 3.2 16.0 293 13.1 C2 Lot Apart. 11.1 2.0 20.0 234 10.5 Subtotal[ 30.0 ac. 5.2% - - -- 527 d.u. 23.6% TOTAL 2,232 D.D. PARE AND OPEN SPACE • park 8.8 1.7 • Lineal Parkway 2.7 0.4 Public Easement 54.8 9.6 Improved Easement 0 Scenic Open Space, 39.4 6.9 • Equestrian/ Interpretive Park 9.0 1.6 Landscape setback Development Easement (49.1) u tote s ac • Park credit (assumes equestrian facility (8.0 ac.) and historic site (1.0 ac.)) OTHER School 10.0 1.8 Commercial Major Arterial Road (110, Row) 13.7 2.4 Subtotal: ac 4.2 % - TOTAL 567.4 ac 100 1 z so[ A' ! 9 i Y 1, mi •r• at • . , HUNTERS II�' ear Iaao er n I� rlrh R �cmr of FaNraw► � ,.` �� z 3�P P; • �•b •' .5./ .,: � h wires {• w.iW!W!b Mitt}Ml MPM r•r •' •.J`y •• •. •a,1� �" .l• � �� , • •lay ��•1.'S O r•a1 S • t 1a.0 r ::.V rrlry 4'j as .':) • ; nL' i•iw •.y i � •r• at • . , HUNTERS II�' ear Iaao er n I� rlrh R �cmr of FaNraw► � ,.` �� z 3�P P; IX. MLOATIOM OF ALTLRMATIVLB In reviewing the three alternat.ves there are some differences that became clear. However, from an economic viewpoint all alternatives are believed to be feasible. From a market viewpoint all alternatives are considered viable. The market information indicates there is a strong demand for residential and some neighborhood commercial uses. The main difference between the use• is.�eho roduct mix and placement within the project. a• the most lar a lots, multi - family units a Avenu• and the project's southr. very. ternative �Mha■ the � on the � and places high density in the middle or along the to the east. Alternative 3 has In density on the ws and has the smallest lots of the three alternatives. From a traffic viewpoint, haslternat because it similar to A erne Decause U does allow through traffic, and neighborhood circulation. Alternative 2 also has a greater impact because it has a From a — =0 standpoint. alternatives 1 and 3 are intornally oriented neighborhood concepts. and Alternative 2 is a community core concept. Although all alternatives vtir provide Quality residential environments, Alternative MOMS& 1 at providing its new neighborhoods a viable community structure (community core) and identity within the City of Fontana. 97.27 `9 3'79 ajy ■ _ C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM f1° �'• o DATE: January 21, 1987 W" TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Brad Buller, City Planne y C SUBJECT: EDMRDS THEATER M1: Staff met with representatives of Tower Partners and Edwards Theater to discuss the status of the remaining items to be completed prior to release of the Temporary Occupancy for the theater building. Staff was infomed at this meeting that all incompleted items except for the architecture reveal should be completed prior to January 21, 1987. The applicant may be submitting an agreement for consideration by the City that will provide insurance that the remaining incompleted items will be completed in a timely manner. Should the applicant submit an agreement, staff will make an oral presentation and recommendation to the City Council at the meeting S w- S BB:Jr CC: Lauren Wasserman Jack Lam Jerry Grant �x ic• 1i u, p Y �.YE�!R�' +`�P4�y"��e :.. ,o e_p .,'i +7A <z .. n.1l+,i+:n`. ♦ :f. 4 k E y u K a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DAIS: January 21, 1987 TD: Members of City Council FROM: Dennis L. Stoat, Mayor SUBJECT: PUBLIC SAPETT COMMITTEE "i5 iiii There are several public safety issues that are continually being brought to my attention by the business community and our residents, which require a response. The issues are as follows: 1. The governmental end day - today working relationship between the City and the Fire District from the public's viewpoint. 2. Whether or not the City intends, or should make future plans to form its own police department. (I have not heard any dissatisfaction, nor have I any myself with the Sheriff's contract. However, we should be able to say that we have examined the facts and our decision is baled on a comprehensive study by experts in various fields.) 3. Questions regarding the City's current and future -Ian* for dealing with natural disasters such as earthquakes, fire, flood, etc. The fact that these topics reactor dots not necessarily mean that any changes are needed. It would be helpful, however, to have a group of qualified people review the area described above and make any recomaendationa that seem appropriate. I have carefully ezvined the qualifications of the type of individual needed to professionally examine these isauea. Based on this analysis and with Council's concurrence, I recommend that the following persons serve on tLe Public Safety Committee. Each person is uniquely qualified in an area which would be invaluable to assessing, evaluating and making recommendations regarding the topics I have Listed. Each listed person has indicated to me a willingness to serve. They are: Clyde Boyd - Deputy District Attorney, I" Enforcement - Military background in Disaster Preparedness (Chairmnu). Bill Alexander - President, Foothill Fire District - Fireman. David Barker - Chairman, Planning Co ®ission - Governmental Personnel Administrator. Bob Dutton - President, Chamber of Commerce - Business Cowanity. Jim Hart - City Finance Director YUSLIC IAnTT conams January 21, 1987 Page 2 RECOMMM)ATION That a Public Safety Comittte be appointed to examine the above three issues and report to the City Council and that the above individuals constitute maid committee. ELS/kep 0 � 0 , M " . 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMOR.ANDLTM 1 DATE: January 12, 1951 SOS Mayor and Members of City Council RCM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City W*vsger SUBJECT: MEBTIHC WITH SCHOOL DISTRICTS You may recall, some reeks ago it was suggested that we attempt to are +age a joint meeting between the City Council and all other School District boards of Trustees. Shun far, it appears that the majority of the school districts favor Thursday, Tabroary 19 as the beat date for the joint meeting. This item will appear on the next City Council agenda for the City Council to determine whether February 19 is in fact the date you wish to meet with the other acbuol districts. If so, we will then follow-up with imitations from the Mayor to the various school board members and superintendents. LMW /kep 3 .l: �<