Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/02/04 - Agenda Packet
s; Bc nlcn & e;tchiie ATTpldm AT I UAMCC "".S. 'a TMOYAj O PITCMIC ONUCC C IC" February 4, 1987 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUHCILt y� ^a .ee'f.Man, wn) Ios rov ornCC 30A os Urub0. CAUrORM A 91705 Illal OCI�OC)1 Andy Barmakian has asked me to write a letter stating my position with respect to his proposed land use designation change. I previous3y wrote a letter to the Planning Com::ission which may or may not be available to you. In that letter I summarized the feelings of various Etiwanda residents about the proposed change of land use designation. I did not state my own opinions. In my provious letter I stated approximately five conditions precedent to approval. The conditions mentioned in my letter werN those suggested oy the Etiwanda residents with whom I had spoken but I subscribe to them as well. These conditions would have to be oatisfied in order for us to support a 1 nd use designation change as proposed. Assuming the five conditions can be satisfied, there are a number of factors to be weighed in determining what is best for the Etiwanda community, new and old. 1. Which center is likely to have the most severe impact on Etiwanda Avenue? I haven't seen your traffic report but I would be surprised if there is a significant difference between the narmakian and Lyon alternatives. 2. Which center is most likely to be what the citizens want? The City is more likely, In my opinion, to extract the most desirable center from Barmakian. He is local; Lyon is Orange County. He is a General Partner; what one Lyon representative promises may not be delivered by the next representative. He makes the decisions; the local Lyon representative does not. The City hds s track record, in my opinion, of being soft on Lyon (so ad to protect the City's dream of a regional shopping center). 3. Which center is likely to give the most benefit with the least detriment? Lyon's center is at an unsafe location without a substantial rovision of Baseline. Barmakian is ' far more likely to hold ownership of his center. Lyon sells `s a 11_ TO THE MEMBERS OP THE CITY COUNCIL REs Andrew Barmakian February 4, 1987 Page Two land to other developers and is more in the business of selling developed property than building and managing it. A local owner is more likely to take better care of his center. 4. What are the alternatives in each case? Lyon would likely build more residential units. Barmakian would likely build a five acre center adjacent to five acres of 4 — 8 dwelling unite to the acre. A five acre center would likely become a blight, especially if the Lyon project is built. If you can keep the Barmakian site from being the first domino for commercial development In Etiwanda, and meet the other conditions in my first letter to the Planning Commission, the balance of factors favors the BarLakian sito. Qi,n;'er; ea n ce, Jr. JB /lal 'SwM .1 1 • J'1� i h I I J tir•• ,1 REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT REAPPORTIONMENT AND REDISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1R CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L•ANAHEIM BOULEVAAD• SUITE 100 -ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA 92805 (714)774.5740•(219)924.16: � •C S ro..r REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT NREAPPORTIONMENT AND REDISTRIVUTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1R The City Council of the City of Rancho Cuu:eongs, California, has provi. ously confirmed assessments in a special assVxsment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", be- Ing Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were Issued to represent the costs for unpaid as- sessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 of said Code, sad special assessment dls. trlct known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 82 -IR Subsequent b the confirmation, certain lots and /or parcels of land upon which thore are unpaid assessments have been aPPONIOned or dlvWeJ, and the undersigned, as Assessment Engineer, has apportioned and seg- regated the unpaid amount of said Installments, all as authorized by Part ■ 10 of the 'Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", apeclFically commencing with Section 8730 thereof, of the Streets and Highwayu Code of the State of ' California. Tl:e undersigned, as Assessment Engineer, does herewith submit the fol- lowing report, setting forth the following: Exhibit A: Listing of segrugatlon and reapportionment of assess - ' rents ASSESSMENT ENGINEER •, ' FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA i Approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga this day of 1988. I o CITY CLERK "o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A - STATE OF CALIFORNIA a r il • v �� i�; 1 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DID, FOLLOWING A PUBLIC HEAR- ING, CONFIRM AND MODIFY THE ASSESSMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN ON THE "- DAY OF } „ . , 1986. ' i CITY CLERK/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, THIS _ DAY OF 198U. SUPERIN NDEN7E TyF-STREETS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, THE DAY OF 1986. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Nay �x...;:��^ • �- .i ..., S.-„ �- '.�zk'.. e h. ` EXHIBIT "A" REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT Parcel Description AMENDED ASSESSMENT Assessment (Assessor's Description) Assessment Rwnalning Number Book /Page /Parcel Amount Unpp.d Amount 2811 229 -261 -38 5129,181.63 $122,003.36 . AMENDED ASSESSMENT Property Description Assessment (Assessor's Description) Assessment Remaining ' ,} Number Book /Page /Pared Amount Unpaid Amount 20R -1 Parcel 1, P.M. No. 9530 $ 80,723.91 S 76,238.31 28R -2 Parcel 2, P M. No. 9530 S 48,457.72 S 45,761.05 TOTAL $129,181.63 $122,003.36* t Indicates the unpaid assessms it remaining against the property after the 1986/87 tax bill has been paid (does not Include delinquencies If any) i , . .ti t I sl I y1 1 I 1' 4 ' SHEET 1 OF x SHEETS AMENDED SHEET t OF S SHEETS DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 82 -1R (REFLMNG) CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COON" Of SAN SERNARDINO STATE OF CAEUORNIA •u � .nw.t. r uuw./ rw r rr wu r tyil.[w'iYLYI i..il M Mt...W.. i I✓YY~ wttlYa..M. r Yn ..T /Yw Jur �...I I,.. yr. • J....YM /MW YI..YI . M Y.4t Y M1. M.�/1 M�'r t /tt�✓ Y I.�r�.r�._t ✓ir {T t4Y✓MYnY Y✓lY q Q t e. 'r ✓ � .Y a� sceu IN fear O pwlUllWIl I.CalMNC \' COMY0"WSW. /IMCtk \J Cl. .......... .W is . K✓ r ¢ i N O F- _y f] F-' _ W N W to y Q o` A f t i i I Ati t:1 rr- 1 > �I \ i i t'y I i_ li ei� .1•r i, . EIS. i 1 1 IS � ''IC • a ° it I }I r F�iis,�fno it ,�� - 1 > �I \ i i t'y I i_ li ei� .1•r i, . EIS. i 2�x •DES- __. ...,,; The Clurman Company, Inc. .7 iW= asy 4, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department Mr. Brad Buller Mr. Otto Rroutil 9340 Baseline Road ti Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 p Dear Messrs. Buller and Rroutil, se, . P M' — RECL•IVED- CnY Of rMICHO C.'CAAOHU rwam.M DfM^.O,Y oil FEJ V i 3/ %1 71819 ;.�il�L =' •= f-�'•N -':5�6 The Clurman Company, Inc. applicant, hereby requests the withdrawal of our application for L.A. and G.P.A. 486 -03B and E.A. and D.D.A. 86 -03 from being processed by the City Council and the planning process before ycur municipality. Res e439�-- you s Donald S. Clurman President The Clurman Company, Inc. DSC /tm Real'Esrate Development ,_, .•, , 433 L.iden Sued, Laguna Bexh, CA 92651 7W494.3707 h- {J n x �l' 1 L� All .j e- i,: - S < t P.C. Has 114 t ltlsaua, Ca+ 91739 Pbaca, (714) 899 -1209 Febeaaq 1, 1987 City of Rancho Caraaw . Re, Mtaat7 Rill ShopPy� Canter D►ar Dsnals, Stisanta they and Sawn iwma Law a slanar Sspartacos to aaeL the Sa hor thq era' Bawl Rtlwida Aw tbi 63�toe1aal o< tyeaa au� is the'satraai. into wesarw 3t•,aLen]e l i dace,". t •° aeib�aee .rarythlK Possible to . .i ..: MAS and. ti TIMI r11�4L u•.lre si 1i allpB u retain tho rnl`.matr�.a`als.,= _frwffu a I" aR- Paoolble,,,,.<SM s� *: . as Itisads Avomw TMediwlovemsg K lfl�` filet snter fris ueatL4, ''S the oensr of itisaaia �wro,' Ao losollr _swA0 7 IM syaPldat:Cosyz at_; , �"• _ " , ti's t6a P�P!sa r' the ' Another saes on R. swujim -dne sister Ye•be4a Piaare In' an aw&&W_ : - llso lsos't�sa ! /2.atls !�at,of itlsaaso.Awpsa, :2h".3ieatUi,. 'as3.d uptj pyrlM•faa• ai fora In a.p cRl' xlth thi '!laal K,tM StiMiWa saaosalty and.nit`li�tar.1 z '' t�•-:r q!i'.!!'!a!!:.NetOo;awolne:n.a; CMffq-0ar�eL ,' ibs,'- ,,abyl°'iyaifos'a „s�i¢bs' ayLoa+a'C..uelty Cbxmb, :uw _' ►111 be lost is ths't!+}wa. K• tlir Sri stl+uta Awsr::h,'. ssariw;awarM q ,� ',•t ✓e_ ✓ }' •� L' r� ,:}'” ` "Mr7 Rul )•a,I.v�.'C Asa a j"i at this �• ' Y ,a -,� �ti:, tiw yaan +l �7- tlia 4 L w 1W lety. T bAw'A aia }ted'i it o a oosaicib fee tllar' b M3�7i "�Mra Ll' • lll;a�',.-Li:'(s''..' ' q'I osoyilabd, 'St tM Atholeplermlut avid rostawttac ektM Qaf � a 1s iPPii�at; +•wrk�>atiw.;' �> a ., �wso +411 !rw ,Mac C $ city Coaaoll r - .t M t a e' d !rt r4, rii6 I Lions Park Community Center 9161 Ease Line load Rancho Cocaaouga, California February 4. 1987 - 7:30 o.s. All item nimitted for the City Cemmcil Age•da met be in meriting. The deadline for aabaittite these items is 3:00 p.m. mm tie Wednesday prior to tie nesting. The City Clerk's Office receives all wtci items. A. C1LL lO AM 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2, toll Call: gram _, luquet _, Stout King _, and Wright _. D. ANNNNNgCN10yYg /pIUWAITOWS 1. Thursday, February S, 1967 - 7:00 p.•. - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMSSION - Lions Park Comity Center, 9161 Save Line load. Y. Wednesday, February 11, 1967 - 7:00 p.n. - PLAHNINC COlOC MON - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Cave Line Road. 4. Tueaeay, February 17, 1917 - 7:00 p.n. - PUBLIC SAFETY COiQi ME - Lions Park Coawivaity Center, 9161 Sue Line load. +. Thursday, February, 19, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. - FARE O ELOPNINT COMISSION - Lions Park Community :enter, 9161 Base Line Road. `t� .1' City Council Agenda -2- C. CONEYS CALIZUR The following Comment Calendar items mew expected to be routine and son -town wersial. they will be acted upoe by the Council at ow time without diaweelos. Any its say be rsoved by a Coomeilmember me somber of the sadience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants. Register No's. 1/21187 and 1/28/87 and Payroll ending 1/22/87 for the total amount of 91,828,276.60. 2. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Ou -Sale General Eating Plate, Barry C's, Barry Chan, 10877 Foothill Boulevard. 3. Approval of improvement agreement and improveneut security for two (2) real property improvement contract and lien agreements for DR 86 -17 located at the northwest corner of Elusmau Avenue and roetbill Boulevard, submitted by Vineyard National Bank. REBMUTIOR NO. e7 -043 A RESCLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAIONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING TWO (2) TEAL PROPERTY INFROVENE11T CONTRACT AND LIEU ACEERMlNTs PEON VINEIAED NATIONAL BANE, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -17 AND AUTEORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEM TO SIGN THE BANE RESMDTIOU NO. 87-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREDNRET AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DSVLOPHENT REVIEW 86 -17 4. Approval to award and execute remaining five (5) moths of Street Sweeping Contract to South Bay Sweeping Compacy, rho has purchased the Street Sweeping Operation from the City's current contractor, Banker Equipment Company. Contract amocut is $8,400 funded by s Tax Fuud. S. Approval to execute Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison for electrical service to City Corporation Yard at 9153 Ninth Street. 6. Approval of the standard contract between the City and San Bernardino County Flood Control District for the funding of Phase I of the Day Creek Improvement Project construction. M �b February 4, 1987 9 11 23 24 25 r 29 31 G` •L� N City Council Agenda GD rebtuary 4. 1987 • 7. Approval to accept a real property and improerment 37 contract and lien agreement and appvovd of Parcel Map 8901 located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Central Avenue, submitted by Rslbert Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -045 43 i A RESOLUTION Or TIE CITY COUNCIL OF SEE CITY Or RANCHO COCAMONCA. CALIFODU, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUIOIR 8901 (TENTATIVE PARCEL W.P 8901) ,i RESOLUTION E0. 87-046 44 A REBOLunoN or TEE CITY COUNCIL or TEE CITY or RAR ®0 COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A i RIAL nOPERTY IMPROTIMT CONTRACT AND LIEN ACREO(ERT FROM RRLIEIS PARa(RgRIP, to& ' PARCEL MAP 8901 AND AVTNORIIISC TEE MAYOR AND - CITY CLERK TO SIGN TEE SAME S. Approval of professional services agreement with 45 - Construction Inspection and AAainistretirm, Civil Engineering (CIA) for the inspection and contract management of the following individual projects: Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Atchison. Topeka and Santa Is Railroad; three traffic signals at various • locations; and the residential street rehabilitation. ` Phase II (Blurry Seal). 9. Approval of professional services agremment between the 63 City of Rancho Cucamonga and Nilson, Inc. - Sheehan and Associates to prepare plans, specifications and ' estimates for the improvement of Amethyst Avenue from 19tb Street to 500' north and portion of 19th Street east and meet of the intersection. Tae dnaign services • will be performed with TUi -S Funds for an amount not to exceed 814.408.00 plus a 10% contingency. 10. Approval of professional services agrea,ent with C.P.S. 77 Consulting Civil Engineers for the preparation of engineering plans, specifications, atd estimates for •• the Dralnale Area VII Storm Drain for A fee of • $55,370.00 and to establish a IOT project contingency fund to be paid for from Systemo Development Feu with reimbursement to follow from the Redevelopment Ageocy. , s 9 .i .�, "l, F �k y =M u Lvd P 6 City Council Agenda -4- February 4, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87-047 93 A RESOLUTID'A OF TIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO HARD AND OTNERNISZ E2CUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NITS G.P.S. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS FOR 721 PREPARATION OF ZEGINEERING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTINAT65 FOR TIE DRAINAGE AREA VII STORM RAIN TOR A FEE OF $55,320.00 10 IE PAID PION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEES AND TO ESTAELISR A 101 PR03ECT CONTINGENCY rUED IN ADDITION TREREID 11. Approval of Revolution Rrputiug authorisation to 94 destroy personnel file@ vhicb are two years or store old. RROLDYION No. 87 -048 98 A RESOLUTION OF T1I CITY COUNCIL OF TIE CITY Or IAMCIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TIN DESTRUCTION OF CITY NCORDI AND DOCOOOTS VOICE ARE 10 LONGER INQODERD AS TIMID$D UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 12. Approval of subscription to Legiteeb Legislative 102 Network prov iding for legislative data base at a cost for installation, subncH -ti d and not to exceed $3,500 for a calendar year. 13. Approval of dues increase for Leagoa of California 104 Cities for fiscal year 1987 -8E. 14. Approval to release real property iuprwsent contract 110 and lien agresent for Parcel Nap $179, located on the nortbwest corner of Cottage and Acacia Streets. EESOUTION 10. 87 -049 113 A RESOLOTI0N OF Tat CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RXZASING A REAL PIOBRRTY IMPROVENIXT CONTRACT AND LIEN ACRED"T FROM EDWARD L. MAYNEN �k y =M u Lvd P 6 z City Council Agenda -5- February 4, 1987 15. Release of bonds and notice of completion- 114 Tract 12772 -1 (located on the Vert aide of Turner at Palo Alto Accept: Maintenance Guarantee good (Street) 4 8.100 Releaaet Faithful Performance goad (street) 981,001 RESOLUTION NO. 67 -050 116 A RESCLUTIOR OF Tit CITY COUNCIL OF IRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCIPTIMG IRE PURLIC IMPROVD2NTS FOR TRACT 12772 -1 AND AUTEONIZING 139 YILIMG Or L NOTICE Or COMPLETION FOR TNI NUNN 16. Approrsl to extend support service agreement with 117 sailed Computer Systm., Inc., for necessary Software upgrades and additions of the recreation maaagement system is the amount of 814,160 to be funded throagb the Recr stiou Service Fund. 17. y;rwal of an enabling resolution creating a Public hafaty Com.lttee. WMXUID TIM JANUARY 21, 1987 iEITING RESOLUTION NO. 87 -051 118 A REi GLUTION Or TEE CITY COCNCM OF III CITY OF RANCHO COCIMMA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A MILD: SAFETY COKKITTIE TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL 18. Approval of proposed asresent vitb Cucamonga School 120 District to @here coat of a crossing guard at corner of Baker and 9th Street. 19. Approval to annex Tract Nov. 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943 123 and 12944 to Landscape Maintenance Disttiet No. 6 (Caryn) as Annexation No. 1 and setting the date of public bearing for March 4, 1967. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -052 129 A [[SOLUTION Of TER CITY COUNCIL OF TEI CITY a;n 07 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Of ., PRELMNAIT APPROVAL Or CITY RNGrAzza'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT R0. 6 A .�•.c .a '� r'w :a.S .:... i r C F' 6 e 1 i Y e City Council Agenda -6- RESOLUTION 20. E7 -053 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TEE /A!REXATION TO LANDSCAPE NAIETENANCE DISTRICT 10. 1, AN ASS&SSMENT DISTRICTS DESIONATM SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. I TO LANDSCAPE MAIETENARCE DISTRICT 10. 6: PURSUANT TO 713 LANDSCAPING AND LICNTING ACT OF 1972 AND OTYRRINC A TIME AND PLACE TOR HEARING OBJECTIONS TRERE70 20. Approval to sense Tract Nos. 13027, 13057, 13055, 13059, and 13060 to Street Lighting Maiutemn:e District No. 3 (Vittoria) as Annexation No. 3 and setting the public bearing for March 4, 1957. RESOLUTION NO. S7 -04 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUECIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Of PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Of CITY XNGINEER'S REPORT TO& ANNEXATION NO, 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION 110. 57 -055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF {ANCRO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO OEDLR 723 ANREEATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAIITENANCE DISTRICT 90. 3 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEIATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGETINC ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE POR HUmn OBJECTIONS Taum 21. Approval to aenee Tract Nos. 12906, 12505, 12939, 12943 and 12944 to Street Lighting Neintenance District No. 5 (Caryn) as Annexation No. 1 and setting the public hearing for March 4, 1957. RESOLUTION H0. 87 -056 A RESOLUTION Or TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OP PRELIRNAXT APPROVAL Of CITY ENGINEPR'S REPORT 705 ANNEXATION 110. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAIDTENAXCE DISTRICT 10. 5 February 4, 1957 130 132 144 145 147 c 154 .e T i City Council Agenda -7- February 4, 1987 ' 0 EEBOLOTION MOJ 87 -057 155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGJGONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING I"S INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. S, AN ASIIESSMINY DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO STREET LIGSTIMO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE 101 HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO _ 22. Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 9649, 10076, 11606 -2 thru 157 -5, 11616, 11793, 11932, 12726, 12727, 12801, 13066, 13117, 13203 and Parcel Map 9916 to Landscape ' Wuteance District No. 1 (City Hide) as Aaaexation Mo. 30 and settiag the date of public bearing for March u, 1987. RESOLUTION 90. 87 -058 187 A RESOLUTION Of TEE CITE COUNCIL Of TEE CITT Of RANCHO COCAMWA. CALIFORNIA, UP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Of CITY ESCINRII'8 REPORT TOR ANNEXATION NO. 30 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 REOLUTION NO. 87 -059 188 A RESOLUTION OP IRE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO :- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ' ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 30 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10. 1; PURSUANT TO TEE } c LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 ARD ' OFFERING A TIME AND PLACS TOR HEARING v OBJECTIONS TRERETO 23. Approval to annex Tract Rom. 13027, 13057, 13058, ISO 13059, 13060, 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943, 12541, DR 85-01 and DR 85 -33 to Street Lighting Matoteoance District No. 1 (City vide) as Annexation No. 18 and setting the date of public besting for March 4, 1987. _ RESOLUTION NO. 87 -060 208 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT , OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, of PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITT EMCINEII'8 ' REPORT TOR ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00. 1 m1 City Council Agenda -8- February 4. 1987 12SOLUTICN NO. 87 -061 A RESOLUTION OF IRE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TNT ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 40. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DRSICRATING SAID kSWEXATION AS ANNRIATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 PURSUANT TO TIE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHT= ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERAG A T1MR AND PLACE FOR RTAR33G OBJECTIONS TNQETO 24. Bet public bearing - February 18. 1907 - rw itoomental Assessment and Development Code Amendment 06 -03 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - The request to mend the parking aection 17.12.030 A -12 of the Development Code. pertaining to parking lot striping standards. The folloviag Ordimamces bare bad public Yoariap at the time of first raadiag. Seemed readicp are expected to be roetive and mast- ceatroversfal. Choy will be acted npw by the Cmemcil at aM time witbast disassiam. The City Clark will read the title. Amy item can be removed for discussion. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMET AND DEVE OWIFT DISTRICT AMEMDNENT 86 -08 - CITT OP BARGEE COCAMOFGA - An application to mend the Development District lap: 209 ORDINANCE NO. 306 (second reading) 211 AN ORDINANCE OF TEE CITY COUNCIL Of TEE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP nom *A" (8-14 DU/AC) TO LOW MEDIUM %M" (4-8 DU,AC) FOR S ACRES TO OFFICE PROFESSIONAL bP" FOR 1.55 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTRMT CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND BATCH AVENUE - APR 201- 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43 AND 201 - 263 -01 THROUGH 25 2. C.OWSIDIRATION Of RtDRGAMILTTOX AND REDIRECTION OF ADVISORY COMN7SSION [MARLING OSDI A j - The City Council Advisory Commission subcommittee will present potential modifications to the Advisory Commission Enabling Ordinance. City Council AHands February 4, 1987 ORDINANCE I0. 307 (ucond reading) AN 0NDI&ANCR CY TIE Cllr Co 213 O7 81ICEO CVCAMMA, CALIFORNIA. � R Tit CLAN I?AA:irr COiMI88ION TO ICY Ill AN ��' AN CAFA.Rtr To 718 CITr COUNCIL AID FLMl1L6 COlMlsaloN �"eY�rlNe !a Se fellenims fter , r� —lam Public e adegrt eeet� raw,' d ►� ,�� aw QsirPealed N public toot=0 1. 81e�aoe o= - I rNaut to uud Easid t o tbs Capral Flu the Land Ulu 215 (4.14 ti /se) to I tree Ildiae 4uity 10.7 acre! at I a lac+ to stl86borboa Caei.erefal for Glen and Iigblaed - the eonbvnt career of 40, 41, 43. IF! 201 - 262 -28, 39, 3I. J6, 37, d�193r Ni-D3 ` Dow elowcut District Ho - I request to uud the for 10.7 acres of lead F from *4 (6-14 door) to 7C! of Hsvu and Iiableaa - looted at tb• aortbrtot corner 40. 41, 43, '� 201- 262 -23. 30, 31, 36, 37, RESOLUTION N0, a1 -062 4 10,LUTIOI Oy THE Clrr COUNCIL Dy 246 XXVlXCWWTAL AtM18C1, CALIFOUrA DRaYI8O SXSU=T AND ANENII(ENT REQDZSrQC 86 -03R, TIN MUNIT OF I N�D�r TO FIR LAND 083 FROI IeDIDx TDIS RANCID X CUCANDNC,l CQ U8E TO NEICI8Cgg0pD8 0l@=C rte' (4-144 VWAC) LAID LOCATED Ar I'll, NOxTWES =0'7 CORNER or IIC %DID AVENUE AVENUE OF 102- 262 -28, 30, 31,3 6, 37. 41. 4 - 4FN , 40, Il, b r I�. City Council Agenda a -10- February 4, 19x7 RESOLUTION NO. 57-063 247 A aL90LOTION Or IRE CITY COUNCIL Or ISE CIII •• OF RANCHO CUCAIWMA, CALIFORNIA, DCNYIMG rBVIROMMmNTAL ASSESSMENT IID16IRIC7 OHILIT A R6 -03. AE CLUMM COMFANT. REQUESTING A CRANE IN TEE ULSTR2CT DESIGNATION ri0N MRDIUN (N) TO NAIGnORROOD CO!OMECIAL (MC) FOR 10.7 ACRES Or LAND LOCATED AT TIE NORTROEST CORNER OF EIGILAND AVENUE AND SAVIN AVMR - APM 201- 262 -25. 30. - 31, 36, 40, 41, 43 2. LNVIIOSNVTY. ANSRRRMNGNT ANp S6 -02A ue ♦ .. d=am 249 �-�s - A regneat to cmead the Land Use Nap of the Cemeral Flu from Low Ned Density Reaidsntitl (MS du /at) to Neighborhood Commercial for approximately five acres of land located at the northwest corner of Seen Line and Itivands - App 227- 111 -24. 25 and 26. 001 IS PICK JANRARY 21, 19V MINTING RESOLUTION M0. 87 -033 275 A RESOLUTION OF TIN CITY COUNCIIL or TEN CITY Or RANCHO CUCANWGA. CALIFORNIA, TOYING GENERAL PLAN AM=MMT 86 -02A, RIQORSTIMC AN ANENONCNT TO THE LAND DHN ILDONT Or TIN IANCIO CUCANOMMA GIVERAL ILAN FOR 9.4 ACRES Or LAND LOCATED ON 721 NORTMWT CORNER or BASE LINE ROAD AND ITIVANDA AVENUE dVIE05NEMIIL A951RS1 AMD NTIiiL 9FEC2rIG PL ■ ANLMOt[ IM 6 -01 ♦ " - d request to amend the 249 LNi(LwaNedium Dcn (q Residential)tooMC (Nei�lboohoo0 Commercial) for 9.4 acres of land to:ated at the northweat Corner of Use Line and Etivuda - AFN 227 - 111 -10. 24, 25 and 26. coRTam FEW JAMUANY 21, 1997 N1RTIp RESOLUTION NO. 17 -034 276 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. DESTIEC RTIVAND► SPECIFIC PLAN AMINUMT 86 -01 SMUMSTING A CBANGE IN TIN ETIVANDA SPECIFIC PLAN DESICNATION FROM CORRNNITY SERVICE TO NR7GNRORHOOD COMMACIAL FOR 9.4 ACRES Or LAND LOCATED 01 INS NOM'1RMNEST CORMEN Or EASE LINE AND EIIUMDA C(tY Council Agenda -11- February 4, 1987 � 3. 111211t: OF Lan.nrrnn G ANLIIDLD aevULM 277 iv i0R FIPFQ. MAF 950 YIT11N 1718 NII2t STlERT ItDOSrgI ` !A!R tC►UtDItC DIIIIICf (12 -1!). RESOLUTION NO. 87-064 278 A RlSOLUTION OF TIN Clrr COUNCIL OF T%X CITr + OF LMCRO CUCANONCA. CALIFORNIA, COtn!)tM AMUORD ASSMAMTS 17 A SPICIAL AUBSSIMT DISTRICT F. 1tt.IC mn&srmn The following items bwa r legal Publication or posting r"Iresemts. 7be Chair will Spam the matins to resolve Public teotlmomy. 1 • AMEeNNNNDI7 1'0 NNltIGIYL CODg COhGlLtvr COINS I ivi 281 i IMDOS7lIAI nogg Onrr.mr►,w - lbdlfiu Cin to a Muni Cipal Code providing that nos- pormitted baulers operating prior to July, 1988 my coati&" to service present accounts only until June 30, 1918; sad that to acre than three full service Commercial and industrial y, collection permits may be active at any one tile. ORDINANCE NO. 291A 282 ;r AN ORDINANCE OF SEE CITr COUNCIL Or THE CIIT OF IM-30 CUCANMA. CALIFORNIA, AOIDDISO C8lF7II 8.19 OF TEN RANCRO COCANONCA NUNICIFAL CODE CONCERNING CONK91CIAL AND p INDUSTRIAL RMSE COLLICTION g:. CIII' ramars•a avow ■arrw , i The following items do not legally rehire any public teetiauny, although the Chair nay open the meetins for Public input. MAYS - Council to consider &sending the Foundation 284 Bylaws to establish a seven member Board of Directors. a 2• Ao( ISSUE - Staff to report 02 preaaut status of the Central Telephone RUN issue impacting tolepboee usage charges in the Rti "ado area. (oral report to be given) , M i`i'. +11 ''1':�i .Ct:�i}... �S".... 4s'.A ?uV• M A r 1 1- r' it . C- iy .y #L i City Council Agenda -12- ■. CORREII. wRIRR I The following Items kwe baai requested by the City Council for discussion. They are net public hearing items, although the Chair wy open the amine fee public input. 1. DO$COWII7tt dtpOINTKINTt TO IRl FI{t M"LOMEFT COMItrION. I. C<�ICl1Ide nm m 9 m 7his is the tic sad plate for the soveral public to addras■ the City Council. J. 1a� 1, how Orly A. lathelet. City Clerk of the city se YaeM Caen~. hereby certify that a true. accurate copy of the focapuing apada wes posted on Joinery ye.' 1947. awenty -no (72) bounce prier to the aratiae per A.D. 1674 at 99204 Raou Live Rood. e February 4. 19$7 i '1 y f 1- f 1- .d°iS$u$uio�iwwuu«.d. g�s:fr�s: -Pi ldfw�y n r $ °u ii r Y wuoa PNwJ «�aPU4we ^ ^Y1... ► >YJ f Y >1> rlJn n«w.MCn S Y 1 CNY> z.INx �T�n 1 z o xr2. �! N i> iN I rJI1 aintin l+ x « = =i riJ rr a1^' J CNri iJ >2l.i s« T n w"i 1 w iee O ^nN �• _�� <£<zrr aQ Ni "�cbcira �M >ew�. �y S<ONO � fNS.m « pJ s =ZJ �.se iM =T'N� iN iojc�i ra�N l r N n xY� a N MgYYYYYY° n � S ' w M Sr Z N f N M 1 R 7 ew: I'..$nzi�ngol 1,:A .a+°! ^GI°..i.°. Nana..N Can! icaln ysTa +MaNN(!an 1 cYC: aeanr s ac .a. J «T « sr1 «�taar« �a ;arb$ �anNnb..Y nNi - e e • o =w oNO�p>e�wo >Zrr Y p ^ n J nn ewniaraoNN ��xr(� i z T NTiOMM�e�SJNTxN Onn9 y« a> it i.. Min <n`e iir ow «ra.c MJ J Jny yyN!,I yfi!c .1 y aN x ^ �i i yn N4NM < VM� na n nn C /� n M Mf' M NM J y =r d N y N yYyU�NYNyY44441Y N4NNN4YU4YU4YNUNNNN4NYN« � f_ NNy yyy NNYNNNN4NY44NNr «rrJ a n000A0000p�/dd d��f dddlllnlllPlrYyydd>Pa _ rOa.JPNnyYne+OJPNd . y4r d: VPfff:rpd:I:rpa� �P 1�• Y• fi p > 1 f nfY�NNOp°S�dptf t". pO Pdp04} jn00f0�p0POOJNV O I p p S j r OOOYOO OOOOC OO nrOSr SnONOOPOOMAO O O O 1° 4 .�Y Ia ley I ` q eFr • �v r l P l B M 1 t "�' - '•fit .✓v9'i ,• , rf dPVPp•. j^♦ rYdJJJ Pd d PJ MddJrd d.fJ 1 r , •, Oy }Y4NL nNys yMy!!w ►pY! ^.IpruryaJM1yVVwwPVMp D 1 r OVY}JpYOpJ drNr.J_VrUYwVn�• }YNw O.rP P.•w YVPdp �f y - y T TwTTOOVOSOV00 � \nCNn/C\nC n 8nr�w 4n nnnwwp irrt .y. ��:.«„ �T.: �Le wnnpr'rG�f\/\sai�9Srr�/n�cc�c _w•=n =� 1` TM1rrr•� rwn sN wy 11 �.<. a3w .r. r r aiNT oP. <wwii :ia ^ :�c�C �'\^'•a 3+^..•ro iiTTi °° i r ` )T JN NN OOrLnN S) Nr0Tn00• i C= �' �rTi)>rM nwM rz iP•r w))Ti 1• R p. r�\ rT� Y��P[Ip OD nw•)a1 Z3�MN••• ^N^ Q ^a^ SN y �f x >YPOZ iyY�lO3CT ^rn ^ai �• 1• pin n TYTnT n �\• i rf rN /\ >11 n�«« °YDMn�Y � f(A\D TiTN)D_�Y Df\^ i r�D^1i0 •Y C n)iT iryn� Y O)> irr••f 1••C rlri�O YC^ }NT /O •C°i• �M NY. 2L�� fAn(9�nY • 9 �NT N•°n NS p.N.N. ~r.MO Sn9 < 9NnL`ir ar S r i rf •••I V °AST ANW � � Te $ � .°•w_ r wlni n .°.a 9e nrr D NT n C It C �\ T w• n 11• r00 • Nn On f•I=' >N D> nn ) y ^Cr t S P-P a N Ns zN n n rnnrn< r\I ��\\ ni 2 }aOr° Y�\w«PLN <x lrwr4 « sa:« z< i��i `�oI.5�.� ^�iPn"'r<rtT <�_3�zz•'n ii.9 annanv.°.� r a°•T\ >irnor � +S��n °i'•s �rR �- rio�r`nn 7iar^r•inonc NY Aiv ^Tn Qa T�vs \' T>YpinweY > r YMS r•••r NN <pr saw s Tai°.ana3wii, r>npi �N•.i >$o Qrrr.N i i-Pi�s Y.N.n narn y(PCS 3NTT:T T yyN' ^w•p � w 2 nn Tr.r VOO tP Oi. ZiN _y<yL r�Y j ±CYn•f S9rrrA •^2)�Rrr Y�Da yr _ _ � 9rY f+•Af^ln 9T nfx ONN T n xP {Nyy r TARrr= Nr _Yr_ r �� Pew -.• i pw.li p o Ty ^T '1• ^rYyN -Rin� NnLS •« cc o °r^ilw c :i xeri- <.rlini T.rw mT ' N« M NN .r•. Yr•3vi�� n nns nn nn N n w �n w nnn.)n � xTr xz z« ni i n n Tz n xi�n � a aA as sD iz n i i a i sari N c 3 JS xx li Tl x ix3 r i M NN MM Nr• N M NNN i UNMNyNNNYNMNVNNyNUYNNNMUN44N NNNNU- -NYNNy VVVVYYVYYYVYVYVVYVVUVVVVVYVVVyW N�Od•. Y• •.r J V YV VurrNNNNYYNMY_rV_rrrV S ypP }Vr}JrlrOdM1 _PVJVyrndM1VPVlYNVn }Y rr. P }YM u W_uo JO M4Y Y P VYNPY ! yrVNr 8 Yr � O }�OUPYpV NY pP VOVp•. nN pN NYdPp4V NVNVM V... pV V�d•IPYpVpPV i001uyynJOOVOp000prra00PdOSOMSPOS� .•S000�00� 1 t'y������ r CCVJJZZZ 3 i w a w l > D° n i e � T y N •�M f' n 0 a \ a_\e4r \itTarro...+..t zr�N�w. Tn.f N \ «YS.wsa..o a..oP rP wl. zrT�..0 =f nyNZZ n w a< >c p.rw . ..OYP T c7a n... TS 2\sa« �y Y! L \T „ZDN2TE ..((4 ryaDTf wTJ O:O M� } YM1 Yr uON±OaO �2T}>N M1.IYJON ST T !.•f. V r azNa"•NraPT «oPO.D zT.. �e T za.yoNY ^Ta Yf1rn �O ST �r�Zr� Or pw� O..Y 2�M OMn wriS VZr3..\i. wViw` =ErOrN � Cr OT O Ow2.E On Iif lrN�f �..nw.Lyyyy NY Y y .l � T^NwT ,4r � N♦ nM1r � G D N O trM Nr y T Y„ <n0 n n r�r nY M On N N NO N 04 nN Na °9 To s z zr sz n n•„. n zT � NY i s i i si z i N N N N MN M N ' NNNYYN4YNYNN�NyyNNNy4y4MN NrJ- NNNNN-- Ny�u�y �ia'.ZYYpeiP +eP.yJVYy�M•uyJ VrCPP�PPCPPPVMPVMPN NroeayPUJYNnoosyP UJYNroapyPUJUNrnaPyP UJu uw ru"J.a aY.`. P.N. Jeai Y.a. n.r.Q`:.Yi rr r oo y.°.0 rJ+ywn .a.a oyii anlVPnOJ YOPPPgSn NaSOPVCrJJP� Opn •.Oan4PP IOgOPOOrnODOOPOn00 .1POOOOOV arVC0000 ou. O.Y Z T a a z n L Y f z i a . a P 1 V e awPawpyua a sapnP aPrpaJ r.nr apyanrarraJa i PrVUpPa.JNPPy pnwOwJIVYOVIS MPJVPny.. ..V MYaPMP..JVNJVnPYryV OP.a.O NyV.1w uONr^.O aYVMVaf VyVNp 'P . Y ;� \ � as>i a.s yi: .ig ?z «2 >� . rr•a n «.. «...... rr \onr wna.TT �YarOTTO im y «Y.oai.�.. n +... w'i wpsa�i s rxzz•�'��� «T w <ayy rrrY iRr.4 n<« . . �TZxzaa yw� «rn zrNa zT „ Yz .aTN� ry wa.w «z r prx Yz s s znoz� i.r ��sT �nwna = Ya ^TTNyvvv� c nT PP O r i.rni o G. p z Tsn�cK v. Vin. i r apTn� i sa> e \ \yw a-a a nTt —U za sg . e e �o =� o�•Y.o Sac Tg nr6 r :�ao� nanzi °n`� x Ya T e flsnongo y ir'i n 0 a \ a_\e4r \itTarro...+..t zr�N�w. Tn.f N \ «YS.wsa..o a..oP rP wl. zrT�..0 =f nyNZZ n w a< >c p.rw . ..OYP T c7a n... TS 2\sa« �y Y! L \T „ZDN2TE ..((4 ryaDTf wTJ O:O M� } YM1 Yr uON±OaO �2T}>N M1.IYJON ST T !.•f. V r azNa"•NraPT «oPO.D zT.. �e T za.yoNY ^Ta Yf1rn �O ST �r�Zr� Or pw� O..Y 2�M OMn wriS VZr3..\i. wViw` =ErOrN � Cr OT O Ow2.E On Iif lrN�f �..nw.Lyyyy NY Y y .l � T^NwT ,4r � N♦ nM1r � G D N O trM Nr y T Y„ <n0 n n r�r nY M On N N NO N 04 nN Na °9 To s z zr sz n n•„. n zT � NY i s i i si z i N N N N MN M N ' NNNYYN4YNYNN�NyyNNNy4y4MN NrJ- NNNNN-- Ny�u�y �ia'.ZYYpeiP +eP.yJVYy�M•uyJ VrCPP�PPCPPPVMPVMPN NroeayPUJYNnoosyP UJYNroapyPUJUNrnaPyP UJu uw ru"J.a aY.`. P.N. Jeai Y.a. n.r.Q`:.Yi rr r oo y.°.0 rJ+ywn .a.a oyii anlVPnOJ YOPPPgSn NaSOPVCrJJP� Opn •.Oan4PP IOgOPOOrnODOOPOn00 .1POOOOOV arVC0000 ou. O.Y Z T a a z n L Y f z i a . a P 1 V it V ♦y� Y' w oarNJ+aJaad a`bi rur +ruuuuY►uduwYNrao v+a +P i NPNy>N./ PlYU� +rp . . >NrrrrbN.l00 Y...OV ....1..P e i r+. YO. IOVSp4rPP >YbMVONrr.\uVObJr.I +JJ \ >�M YyT )f1r <..Ir.lu..y rT•wN NY >FO y'•nm Y }YawM >• IF" >Y>f ' J '-' nl s asa..z>; N.%s>ilrr>aaa r s x.In Tr• aTTm�. V�1 �wni }lSmi� ;.bpP ll'o T.O.• >b�Mw \ + - f� IIS rf O.,MS(n<T.'. rmmmmnnmmmm-•n s i N .� TarT ..1 .Iy it �.lr iil� S m CNQw TNZmmNT zTx \� zrizN>n nnnN a> srrNi�Yav � izF'.zzS r�n - sygz .r.'- C,'- T�Beoib C, esmrz ..os.•rn 'o j'g� .>.r �m ica wo o -0 a i a =n nna rPS�,nm in$ ao e 3 Sr\ _nx C 'ten 000. (r�S ~' H rNMN m_Mwr y< 1 y. n • N N }Nn } 1 C �mnn coos nFmmzar- .noemc'.. Y.. F<f oJa a.r....marF rxv�N arr T »zma xa.. TT..m a s zNr NfiS N yy i+ x n>TPr OO FO >a� ^a<be <Y�YNFSr > S O � N Ri�r r. 4 a 2 O.+ n n2 n >lt nnaOwOMf 9 9a IT � .^•imeanr n.Ir wNT- .slr�r.+waNF o� >oT`�. :T n< nTy�rrTwN r>-a yii <ouxm ev Ny nr r �efrwalN,. #� € :rar >m�<a �a, .a• nr � Y z srNNm b zN T Y �nrwz3ywa' zr� Tr: y. a P OyYZ YN 01K }rr W.rn u O V (a�2 AOm .•n\ a_a>a0 rG P O O C aCti f M PO Oz�� mi C �J }nf ]Fe a I iS i >a 1 rK i 3 T ,Ni•n a < m T r} a N .1 n Nnrnn n4 xrnn Z% Nnnh 4 1 V 1 � �r� on do m��caonr o_ onr N a z nx �z TP zzrzzzxT iin i � is sa a ri s�ei ii��o isz m i mi ii i i+�iiaasms ziN \ � N N NN N MNNMMNN NN � m w+± �NNNNY�± N4NNYYNNNN4MYyUNNNNNyN♦41INUNN4N 1> fly JM JIJJlIJJJJJJ_!SS sS VYYUYy JYN.um pP rPPJYN�Oa.rPVJVMV OJON�N �\mi+u �0a..lw S+ 1� S 1 } I1 PY 4rJVdPTUV._'.P UPMO40YOJwuYr VI4.d MTrNNJ8rPP.I '> '� ..yyYaldJr �lunp +p��r JOYM pP MON.'r PbVPOVrYO�bN! YOOM �' J POyWlONjry�I I .�OO.IOSPSObmVMOn00y0Y0MNpOPOOS ,� tY-- -r v.• � ' 1 n L im k� �4 e' i f � as i.P. s is K OL iz yn a 0 9 n P w e .. n r e s N Y.. 7 an Sy is IN ar 1� .e 1 cin i i mP i ri 1 I ii 1 a z < ii s 1 N i n PN SA s J •♦ Y � In IA r tiP 11 N J 00 r IIAI] Y^ 'J• of 1 /.i a yvYY.0r04NbblOgMJYN�N�OrlJN °YCO «f0 I )` YV«pb N.P CCVppM I�JMNC f� GrYM � °r O! OC I-uOC R ^SOx, ^Ciro rT n�Og i {f 'T'1 >Fr TnT yr ^woin� ;izsmQ a «P I -lea °e avPOOao.z. ^�ia� bo ; ^izsonN\ \sn wwz e =MA;J «nn rm �y « r gav i x e� ^ � All �a�A e s I _ ` M A e L•n T� ^w p Nr T2V° T «° � M 3 trRT 1 R `9.^ -�.'Q iviz� >nOisaw�TCnwrP:aaa�o ;^T ° o« j ai° "azo.z\ Tlwyb 'P «ia. n.- aw�unOpw�x az 7s nl �' S �nAOnM agSS� �TTV \lwC3lOf «C ;gain :Cn O IS kv nn a i n iT I sa za n s ^a x Sn i I L • n si y � 1 MM P3 « aP « N 1 4YU4UNNNYNYw `rrrr _ I ; O ♦JJJ1Jf Jf.J!l�lw++Y4Ni4JN.f4 Uiii -MYi NNU -_ n bVVMVVVVVVVPPPPP�}�. MJPMPP I� = �• OdbYP NlYYr O.pPVPN +NNwU4J 'I JNNg ^.pN VTMf YNwONbrP:�O:bv �n O 'x P�uYO�JO� \O NUpNI VYYJOJT }O ?Jl4PNNr w la � SL' 00�0�0lOOVOp.pNP Y00•pp O YOO 0Np NpO V4� OrOnVA 13 r OORrOSY000SONON OOY000 j^ I Y } �` II Ll \ e 'Y{ alt _ jptyy��}��L✓,'3� v _ • 3 d e rf O°°"a'w i�o'��iuN S'�a °POOaPOYeua ' �. �. or9rwwYNYraPw qi w`.P._ii:,.°.�o rrNpJJ °iV, n,°,s nraouS.a..^. v � 9°, ^9L U••a JYf YJNPVPNVNpraPw iT '• � SA u��ePr J ^•>.naai�z�a g.>.n 4�z^ai8'Yiiiw �'�'ws wwsjw?e �n U = � LP 44P py >Yan�ro �f o >i1� ^nwi ��i�r > 1=Z�2w�w =�GS twit J ,P i -i • Nv^°•<?ons��i.^ai'°i i >Tni 7 ^'•'^ z�s� `a.' - ^ ^«.a ociCR��• °yNi��aa'�`wio.°.�iny w.c , y oyo.n -,�•,. ^,_„» D +��'nrT S w a 2My r�wr Li CaM 1S O • ^C n 7 n� TP il�Y. yO OOii�nw � D n� p P C= (-• me O if90^ i^i °t wVn � r P i Yn D !! ^^r Y a,Nw Or! Ni• n D • DO n } < > MN MCl Tp I_`n„101<i, �Oi�AT >CS PgnJ pO p p ii2 YGOw/� F'i Or•• ^F� <°OtdgOe gww • \.ciOTPyn9�10 >V34Ei�E�,Si i �,. wai Y9^- �1=iinL.•- ° °i��b$r a nn=.i� w isDO.<.nnn �.°.�rz icc> ,gam Mw> �i^ \YiwMN`r^,M nYiP.> °OVA D>w���> PZTYSnY J iv�rnw,An>^,w O o [ .n.�"YTnnN°w °wi iw ^ ^aw,ri,> ow HF � ^N T° cy"� i L... rya N 'rn c.:w .^'.zo rc°� oyM aA NT „• ,� n n nN PP MA= y o r o o^ °a A •' •" ^^ Yunn n.i:nN n i A r ^ 2 TT -T Z,nrTn j r P iaa zzDa azyi y � PN� ^MP i wM � N rr rrrrrrrrr_rrrrr u�uvumai MPPU ^MOVVpV J,�vMVUaf- rr � t` •N•OaPJPP1VYrOawYpVI VNrOapJPP1VMNN4N4LYNNLN ,l NroaPrwPf NNr ,a o n ,^ P 1r J6yfpPaPVNnPYpPi4VVSVA fPUy P,9Y U JrNy T• wOOMV N•�•'•f0 Pn al.rafO0uOP4 ^f Oaw•]OON10Pp �� SN�YNnypPf N onF+• oe,uN• e n•- OpPa00POPrn J SOr400JSO0aNOP j• v _ • 3 d e rf i G� O ♦Y�w0��4P YP4400b PYPNVVYYiwrp �`.N/JJ�YP V"rNYiOr NNr JO,p ° X.,f 04PNN.. zaw�y » » » « « «« j r�iNa`. uf►, �.4.. `'• `, - �sifo?S T'iffJ� a 14 vnr i.»i rY aai.aij iii 7� )�• �zr +oiyn °" : <�Na^i/ >1 y.T Y�N'as red �P J �'nir ==Z : a S «•z'r'.a S' ��zsa -°iin g� r� .r. w`ww ° ».�.b z,°. e��° "N'•�oee b'o i ° ar ^� °W i ivV � y wSi ST n r P Ow. P � b w4 wVUUUN4N4NN44N VV '�O�OVPMl.YN�OdA Vj. a rOi V Y V V _N It P a�!!ONnr ���. +• d 4 15, C •or- �irn _ �aY » a M T M e i ` •a 1 f J . a P o r �f r. A 9 ' . m r <t' :r 'car I S _ 1 COPYa.r....,.._..� A00YCAt M AYANMMK MAr INUM q T. OywY•rl N A67Yte 4fwYr C..YA 1010wei.w ferYCV1. 8010 -_ ^" 7Yr1.f0.eAAwil wcr4�• OwewJwiMrAi.r L "MU W oUMnn m m +n -i�lr Otrral 1701 cm01lrw1 )'lath) oil o«A.. e.fw 7DC lAaAO , fIfQ01 p, A Oee fYW i x#AVM d A"UCAN W wa• 7 la.fw o..e G.N ferr 1 77787/ W 704LLACOOKU 7 w eav i.w].W 7 R 10 l MrJ Wr a.7t7 CY ANllea 0eu1oa 011110 a Yrar N wrr «.. r 0..r I.a7f Iootalll alW. wcro CfeA� 91730 S, hw7 m 701.4 / 077.Ua 'L Ar•+7.r Yr MI ar M+Ne r07nM w K bra A'r«f of W NI Y rl4wrf N • 7[fwfA W AI waYAr.... r.W�rrwYtld.wl wtNM /wireJMAYNeY Y.YyfCwNlut y M VAn 01 IA4/07 r.rr .+��+err�Y r•r.w�� ..� r r.Tl w� r. wM V tee• r W� � V W T � �..e rf r Y.� W��� wry ✓��r�Jl4 wwr�rr �Jr,�ww w�wr�� F �.� ti w a� a ✓•.� � r 1f�. � w✓w r. •V�f .mob V•e r. V.w/�rw��O.� wY��Y.�. � /��Y �/.« M •PPUCATM)N. Rr 777ANM808 n 1An 07 tAlaawA C." N _Y wr..�M ww M ww�1 V w. ..n ..W rYw� � W w �• .W .re �A Y. wI V �✓. r. V r rw. w rV• �tirr Mr Yr•rr�rM���V�f �J.r�.���\ wr.I. �V M _T Yn ��w.r Y.��w rAV.�V�V w��r✓e• Y�Vr��r �rV WVVrMr~ i DJA'J frY7 MLw 7ti Lief /w DfOfnwnl L'r OJO Aw.t ❑1 «YM�N• O 7N.ar7 rr«• ❑ co7n1 wlAln 3111••• %4" 4 , 10877 �(ae�yCN�1N LUIDLP. COOSfi�'rbV lnY-.Tev. W77 fmmia- IFOR'fLTY p G.AOlENTL'� .�owc ; �LL0.srntaL P *w IWIN6 or n �TlG8Y1' l(v:UCTftS�/� NOR1F1: ldtllll!/lfYY Cepean;aie.�OF� ice �Otli{l: +N/ktS4St,IL TA¢L' Ees MOUSTN&L PAee- lL�EST r� J . CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11 STAFF REPORT° r DATE: February 4, 1187- [ TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer a W7 BY: Linda Beek, Giginaering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of hgrovement Agreement and Improvement Security and two (2) Peal Property Improvement Contract and Lein Agreement for DR 86 -17 located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard submitted by Vineyard National Bank. __ -1..._m. 1. i 7.. It is reroeaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting said agreements and security and authorizing the Mayor and City CGerk to sign said agreements. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND OR 86 -17 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 13, 1486, in the General Commercial Development District located at the northeast corner of Klusman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The Developer, vineyard National Bank, is submitting an agreerent and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Perforasnce Bond: $14,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $7,000.00 The developer is also submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for undergrounding of overhead utilities on Klusman Avenue and within the site, and a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for construction of one -half (1/2) the Median Island on Foothill Boulevard. Copies of the agreements and security are available in the City Clerks Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Res. WJ"uboitted, I i 9 Attachments ¢ CITY QF RMCMD CIICAMM Dr*DVMT AGREERMT FOR OR W27 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Vineyard National Bank hereinafter referred to as the Developer. THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City located northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time to which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted E by substantial changes therein. 8158 vineyard Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -1- 4, If the Developer fails 'or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Ron - compliance may result In stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right -of -way improvement work required shall be constructed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other Incidental work oeemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or omissions discovered during construction shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said ,plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Mork done witnin existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall hav, the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified di in completion, AM to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the eveloper and /or his contractor by any y lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement. relocations, or removal of any component of any Irrigation water system in conflict with the required wort to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the watem system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkwny trees as directed by the Comm pity Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terns of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal mount of said Improvement security shall not be less than the aaamt shown: -2- s , t. FAITHM h$PoILWME Type: Principal Amount: $14,000.00 Name and addre,.s of surety: W713 AL ARD LABOR Type: Principal Amount: $7,0D0.00 Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR 10 ACCEFTMCE BY ME CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite t oNld. x 3 Date . -29-m Y Developer gna can `` °Lawn R. swum Bach Date 12..29.86 by Developer gaup Donald N. Castle Printed f Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest y er Approved: Attorney LyYELOPER'S SIi MUM MIST BE WTAIQIID f1 ARD COMPLETED IN 711IFLICATE -3- L„ ;, W r'p = f 7 4 Cllr W AMCM 61d1°1C'gI r Fm r!r! InsJoi 1. t r,...__ ra zft&E IMM Ooes noL i •,n9 no;Zpgg= M iti= 1= �t �slts P *C.C, curb . g. P.C.C. si give Approach Street lights emovl of Removal of p'C.C. :eaoVil Of P-r *n* FEE - 1WO =N CASH _ B= wm,t t0 City Ser"Ardt CoYnt of 46f4ko RICAN Prior to fs�q�tW Revised 3 /84 .y m "Wing sha l - •wi:: iia tita,_�q ■ `�/ . .Y.UY RD Dxe*or 29, IM City Of {YILY 9x20 Baseline, =nor Rancho Oxmmpr CA 91730 WArDWM PEWOAYOi'>1l hrevombls Authority to Pry i08it7 /8668 Garden& At the request and for the &cow* of vinwjjwd.lWtaaL BK*.r rye hereby establish in yaps favm as, Urom able Authority t o. pey .. iW667/9"2 in the stmt at S14,000.00. ... this IIrewcable Authority to Pay is available against yoi.r tight drafts dram on VLeyard li :Soul ]took, ltarbo acuc p, d�, and aocapadod by yos latter certifying that the City cf ttah I Qr=ncga is entitled un3ir its agcrsnt with Vinryard patient Nock, relating to huilding at 9590 Foothill Blvd., llerbo grspoga. Said cortificatiam shall be final and Mding on the right of the City of Famr, o mmoega to so draw. The aocltt available undu this irrevocable Authocity to Pay tW667/8648 will brralnod fray tim to tim to the sabot of pa}emt of yes draft& or upon your' wdttat authority draw heremler and upai yes request, upm recaiviag'fca Fah a letter arttfyiaf the ,taint by Qdch this >riavocable Authority to Pay 1086{7/8618 is to to reduced, and the avooht.that will ba available bersmder after much redrtlm. atis 1mearcmbL Authority to Pry ahPirae m -m Dt-bar 29, 1987, in the United Statue of America. candi Of ULis lft Your drafts dram bear the tone by - J; ty Pry will be duly hmoenc by • , vs upon paesantatlm. Please awe that All drafts bear a reference to � cur Mmcvocable Authority to Pay MM7 /BNB. .. 115@ V*WYAeeAVMK Very truly yours, Pet wbdsnmssr. vim President DOomber 29, 1986 City of awwt* Oxwonp 9320 Baselins, SLdto C (CA60a AND MCEF S) Rancho CuOlUmnA, C71 91701 nWA301AZ AUM32 1Y 1O FAY IM45 -CM46 Gall ®t At the rurmst and for the amoumt Of Vineyard Netiorul Sank, ws ID 15-6�cthi ym t off c 000 &amity to � Sthls Irrevocable Authority to Pq. is aoailauo against yow alabt drafts dralm On Viney =cd Natiorrl Sank, it j - Cslifor .193 sod aO=*Wdad by gOt¢ lettsr OKlSfying that the CCiityaof Pancc ` 0"=194 is mtitlad undar its agresnt with Vineyard m1.N.+..l Ste. xnlatin4 to Building at 9590 rOOtih111 S1W, 1lalhcmo �. Said Certification shall be final and binding On the right of the City of Sancmo Qroaarga to so drat. Ybe smart mailanlo mrdtr this IrreVOC>lile AOthority to pay 608615 - 08616 will be reduced fans tie to Lisa to the extent of payent of Yom drafts or RM yOW written,m0ocity dram bexander and upon yas l`a s`*tr R= retaiviny from YOU A lath certifying the Meant by M&" this Irxamm'hle Aurhx'ty to Pay W6615-06646 is to be re&noed, and the aoaht that will be available harrxdrr after such 7Ms irr"Dcable A"t1 =ty to PW Wires on December 29, 1987, in the United Steles of 7Mmerioe. 93.4. caadih t - that yes drafts edam dram ade� the tame and by us roam preamta`. ton.�Pleeue erwaee to that all drafts boar aa�� raferahca to Our Irrevocable &Wxccity to Pay Is86 45- 06616. VVery tnil Rioyours, BiVr6C O+arl .!&.—v e15O VO4YAND AVENUE . r o. sox m . nV4C"O CUCAMCr4k CAl.7gYM @IM . mtlma.Qmn 17 ■ RECOIDINC REQUESTED BY: and YEN RECORDED KUL To: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA P. 0. Box 807 RANCHO COCA ONfd, CALIFORNIA 91730 REAL PROPERTY IIffAVE ENT CONTRACT AM LIEN ACIEEMW THIS AGREEIENT, made and entered into thisf{ day of 19_Z(— , by and betwen Yiueyard National Banc thereinafter referred to as 'Developer'), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONCA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation thereinafter referred to as 'City`), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for OR 86 -17 development the City requires undergrounding of overhead utilities adjacent to the property to be developed; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City. and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to sucn postponement provided that the Developer enters Into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said Improvements if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that the City r td �y •;rev •,R�•' \ih� 'rY�: r ^ °�"���� 1,U .' +4 :„n�uM 9 shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. NOM, THEREFORE. TW PARTIES MAEE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that he will underground existing overhead utilities along KTusman Avenue on the project side of the street within the project boundary. The developer also agrees that he will underground existing overhead utilities from the west project bounder; to the center of Klimman Avenue within the project site. The undergrounding will be constructed in accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the Lima of the installation. (a) The developer will be eligible to enter into a Aeiabursement Agreement for 112 the actual construction cost on Klusman Avenue only. 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of said improveewnts shall be ' at no expense to the City. 3. In the event the Developer shall fail or refuse to complete the installation of said improvements in a tfaaly manner. City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and cuwlets said improvements and recover all costs of completion lacurred by the City from the S3 1 Developer. I. To s conditfcns this scups the Nhfch of Ag performance �4Y be esPea ant and to $ r: w tha the Deve) of saha Developer he dadr� Clty ;n eaCl«n hp e^ to tens and and •the DavaloPcr g said faQroy sltuat,d does b eaenkCf�, of aro. funds Ca ffprn! nnyey City. to trust, the f the$@ Presents upon default by In a• t0�VIt: Rancho Cpcgpnga, C g descri grant , bargain, Cfp. pf � ArZ4Ct ^linty of San Bernardino. State eb �^'� l S. ! TAfs C0^veYMce i 6. s to trust for the the act d Rowsrof0ra• fr Purposes described stove. And. f ^as to be Developer ros be hall, othaMs °, !t B hinder this ,tyraaaak faithfully Parfprr Pests s and be cons �Yf ^t. all of governed rights and oblfghd Znd treated as^ full forte ary efts Conveyance dqy the Prov! _ ons o► t'�' a o°rtye a n effect and !n the other aDPltpable Ste of the CivflPCrtfus Vith respect real Proper 11 Per the ; to s banal! ' This Agh ��• taf^tng to xortgages on tats Q f Calif, rnia l.nb 1 each of or the helps, �tt shall be bin property. r y; Part f xecutors, ding upon A i Its hereto. adrinfstrator and o hall four* 4' $, slice aura to i s sad. ;a. Assigns or., »!fir" , J111111 L pp�'VVt M M= the 1 Nut: 114 of 30cti to, To ^up south, .'_.11� % llwtl T r ca. daeQihad Y � of tllpa, Fa9e 9, M�o."da at'ell ..� �/ al OxAn _ Li0 at t point on eva.'d Kyw , 54 08, /� Which Is north 6W eat er �, 11ytr S0 heat f 1Poi+w` wAitli nov 51 09 t, 32 321 eataot= thuroa pyo 540 t bp51Cti4ia 3t tA�jp h tr 321 fM [oOthill B�i1w� a. t!M �y the North lion of feat: V,. a saxi, ao U�ancr � OW �! seat/ 250 fast to the point of ba91,yli+y. . Rxocd7i a� �+lY 4 .24 1950 as Dock �to � qty of s n ♦ / Rocords. arosl%d January 19, 1951 in Book 7'04, P ge 5 official • Page 591. 0111ciai Ii �y �1. S. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the tern "Developer" dull be 'mortgagor' and the City shall be tha ' 'mortgagee' as those terms are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mortgages on real pivperty. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to mover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties Mato haw executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. Cm DEVELOPER CITY OF RANCHO CUCARWM. a CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: By: +ven R. Swenbach enn�or u ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM e e Attorney veCity Clerk i fS t a4 PiM1J +i .1 a3 t' "•s 0 RESOLUTION N0. 3 / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO: ` CUCAMiOMGI, I CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TWO (2) A REAL PROPERTY IMPROYENENT CONTRACT AND LIE)I AGREEMENTS FROM VIIIEVARD NATIONAL BANK FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW x6_17 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS. Oevetopatnt Review No. 86-17 located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avcnue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Virwyard National Bank was approved on August 13, 1986; and Wi ERFAS, undergrounding of overhead utilities, and construction of one -half the Median Island on Foothill Boulevard established as prerequis to issuance of building Permit, has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreements by vineyard National Bank. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does AgCalifornia accept said Real Property Improvement Contract directs t7ietCity Ci Clark Clark to record sa�meoln the office Recorder of san Bernardino County, California. a3 t' "•s 0 F ♦ • �y r1 W�rL �'• RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF-THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMMM. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVENNMT MEUNEMT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPNEAT REVIEW NO. 86 -17 WHEREAS, the City `Council of the City of Rancho Cucaawyga, California, has for its consideration an Tmprcvement Agreement executed on + Oecember 29, 1986 by Vineyard National'Bank as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent' to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Klusman'AVenue and Foothill Boulevard; And < WHEREAS, the installation of such Improver -ts, described' in said Improvement with red subject to the tam thereof, is to be-done in development of real property as referred to Planning commission, Development Review No. 86- 17;• and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreuwrnt is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. rr NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California that, said Improvement Agreement 'and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of „ Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. .s ', Y " • ]Y A E`l'i 3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 TO: City Council and City manager FROM: Russell H. maguire. City Engineer BY: Duane Baker. Administrative Aide SUBJECT: Request to award and execute remaining five (5) months of Street Sweeping Contract to.South Bay Sweeping Company, %So has purchased Street Sweeping Operation from the City s current contractor, Hacker Equipment Company. BECONWMTIM: Staff recommends that the City Council award and execute the contract for street sweeping for the remainder of fiscal year 1966 -1987 to South Bay Sweeping Company. BACKGROUM0: Per Council Action of August 21, 1986 the City entered into a Street Sweeping Contract with Maker Equipment Company. Maker Equipment Company informed Staff that it would be eliminating its street sweeping operation and selling it to South Bay Sweeping Company. South Bay Sweeping Company indicated to Staff its desire to continue the Street Sweeping Contract under the original terms and rates which the City entered into with Haaker Equipment Company. Having provided the necessary insurance and credentials. Staff recommends awarding the remainder of the Street Sweeping Contract to Swath Bay Sweeping Company. Respectful tted, R u re City Engineer RM: WJ1 /l a li. CITY MEET s+cutrc >rr 1! 0Y aM�sOSnt. saw •wand bat" ft* clV of Into this 2-44 a`Cftm— "�Aaa� J City 1; • (Mrainaf r ca led tY to P{y. M cOnb'actor t ttr tailed l�inof thiaC��� Paved �1 t>�f�jji tPwnt�fl P+also or the sold ashi6tts entitled strict i Bence sCacitVf lik ammer. h cmolo w as sr The COftstdarstipiM� i oAS• Pr° visions this aeegty�aLl /17 and an�M Jy�y jC i �j "Parie�j thly I for dock SECTION 3- 'aowi � right 6A., PrOyfdsd far r_ _. • PtaYit QOntraCt Is y""the corracj ��Mll On the led__�P. a of1N laTWSS, YEl1Epi, sL+Mt swo'pin #. th0 mount t.he cnsa ya Mrytn s/aCifiade}as Mato Iva aXSCU ad this Contract ATTEST.. XAMCo CKAWW By: or r tY a gT: rh say K Sit Jet„ �tallo �� J Csrtttksts of lisirncs Te, NMN,rw/, Myea1 er«,w, Crpy «M, N,MNwIM,NnNI Fn Iearm Cpr7wW, RMt Rr,NYaNS,IbrMlYle,pA'c•a laid„ nan6ar w6w« rr4WrbMN ,o,rrYNrNdMa"rR„wwaMwRww, dbea abNa,eaeru,roc+mNlt . w «oae : ww,Nr8wIreM ab eaWaq a,wa.. owry, wMtlr4 Miry rre7 «p19aa, a�r.w w 6„uek mm C«MoM Hal«, Nar w Aftm rCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA aMIM, IFMrr+ YlWcrYna„ MYgI�UP.YI�IrY1M�Ma1�' ►r,+Y�r�l 10 b1,aY lYI.tYYM 11.r1Yr1iM.1 �Yl Y�.,YYyW.Y« ��dOM.4MMw... P. 0. HOE 807 /INMIYYMt�..�.' F"bow".,me.,,rworMw..rrrrrYw.w arcwrror 12/24/86 r,.. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA. 91730 LjATINt DUANE AskY, NATIOME MUTUAL INSURWE COMPANY L w,r,s NANONMVE YUVJAL �I�MLCE COMPANY BALKER COSTELLO , TWO i,mw*8W wd„aMYNae, whMa ew. ewe WVW is wMaM rNM+,,,tw awrRI rESCCHEDULE TYPE Of INSUPAKE roLICY MUYIC9 POUCY �GT� roULY InNn of U""M0 T" GENEMLUANUTY DATE DATE OCUNN 11 COVOWW" Fm Q Eo*m Mdd CNwr Nur! PmMY own" f Q UnMrp,YM Hand � faipNae Donmr M�f 4w w Galfce°Ikvia'a' 73 SN 003 240 0002 JP ue�ti 2/15/86 2/u/87 D� 8500, gNa,M Flom 00WOhm" GL f'ww bowy 1@ Od^aMnYw F,m ( A OWN p Na,� 73 RA 003 240 0001 2/13/86 2/15/97 hmpift Da,y, • X00, F7aCESS UA37UiY p Umwr, Poem 73 CU 003 240 0003 2/15/86 2/13/87 == h,000, B 1 ,000, rfNatt OasrM wORREAS COMPENSANON SW,A«y AND 73 WC 003 240 0004 2/15/86 W3187 EM OYEAZ UA4IUIY _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ITS ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS AND EmpLOy7.ES. .SWEEPING. taolr a was .EANCHO. CUCANONCA. ... . rrwrb AllrYw r«i1aTA " aMIM, IFMrr+ YlWcrYna„ MYgI�UP.YI�IrY1M�Ma1�' ►r,+Y�r�l 10 b1,aY lYI.tYYM 11.r1Yr1iM.1 �Yl Y�.,YYyW.Y« ��dOM.4MMw... Ia•: d•i /INMIYYMt�..�.' F"bow".,me.,,rworMw..rrrrrYw.w arcwrror 12/24/86 r,.. ,Ye Vallm AskY, NATIOME MUTUAL INSURWE COMPANY L w,r,s NANONMVE YUVJAL �I�MLCE COMPANY COSTELLO , R RAY SWWINO •ARTESIA BLVD. ITTAR BEACH, CA. 90266 YIN, Y ^, L Y+ yt {� `� GL 29 10 LL'd C r Tb's awwaao.nrm (EtKM a IwK1,IsW60aCrur. sMwLwa WMeet" Ir. r lh prq -doss �,u yw Wp. �• :a Itlwawwr.nacnw 121/26 8� Is Bohm mb W " m Y k.. d.6..Iwabrral4.aK<fI Fleq A' 73 SH 003 260 0002 Esswumw / II>mrl.a.a.I SOUR BAT SYEEPIHO �MSa.sLan.1 Tbuftmw ow.►lrts nal Y• H. SYARIVOOD s�ws.n w 8 wwlaal b M P"nom alsssrq a•" Is 1 M~ACTMRS AND CONTRACTORS L�AEKITY TMOMANCE ADORRINAL RIIUM 10".wa i I..Ma11 4 eapwa 14' 1 Dt 7aunlmM '}}Tr.1UpM�a.asYW/pi.ykwulrwMWSeaur srl ..f•KArIb►.Wry� h*jSS 1. the wAawwalym 0w11YwNlar wyll M.rvl h'wM MYI aIasm.wl y'4 w•wM 0.1[�hl ? w awaapas .rrr'°Mia::rui..wMhuiaO"°n, cam.,,, w.m�c'm..rGa°+s'W..M fit. wham 'TM+wmr'Mr ky �. rtwrwppwsay UWIadY.wy) b CLTT or RANCHO TUCAMONCA ' ITS ELECTED AND APPOINTED OMC1ALS AND EHpLOTEES. a P. 0. Box 807 a RANCHO CL- CA. 91730 :s r d JOBS nm!PINO , RANCHO COCWXGA CL" 12.0173 .M, F f� 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Itagutre, City Engineer BY: Duane A. Baker, Administrative Aida SUBJECT: Regwst by Southern California Edison for a Grant of Easement to electrical service at new City Corporation Yard, 9153 9th Street. RECONWNTIgr: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize and execute the Grant of Easement requested by Southern California Edison for access to their electrical service panel. BACKGROIMID: To insure adequate powr U met the npuirements of the new City Corporation Yard, and to confers with City Industrial Codes and Standards, Staff requested SCE to install an underground_ electrical service transformer on site. SCE MWIrts access to their transform for routine inspection and maintenance purposes. To assure their access SCE requires an easement. For this reason, Staff recamewds granting the easement for SCE. Res c W y Submitted, quire City Engineer RGM:BAB /la i �V'S4 a, r +ffjjl i 1111111" .;1 c ' •aawatlr aaaaastaV N � f�MMa CYIwaY Ll4Y Cryrl MlW rl9larr Y1i W fa�rrrn crwr. "m c+a.e aar plowin IM , Willa. tWl�r fOr , aai 1aOYa tMY tall[ NA aamaarra t1Y� far afa Vr lllal .w w ti�111f1' 0 L1 /oO1i 911 sd_•rr�_` a�ri �u Itatarrlrl [21T -i11Ff ___ or " "T�'� aftY 1NM� elm r aNt, rYatr S. a WIrYIYY(wYatl ►IW nrhlrw/ Y Y'rrW' aaarMl Y 7rt� ). m al�� W�o.1 "w �1 Ir Y YII�Iakilr irlifal,M i1Y�yiM/ a�w i I�sk�r Mine. � a l r��rtr/9wrM wr����!la!�fs.'rMalrfr'). a�kti" Of AM. 311,11, a /alr,uW WYI na IM/rryptlfntrllt� wMait r a rlrrr k/Y �aMfal. a�ofw M tla lVIM M loon. Mr w1Yk a rka M so mo lift, M w r Y W lltaa0a imm r iri. Y /aa a p 1asr,/ r lam i. R� Y M No. YaYr r Yk CNOV. saw 'w" win 11aV�raY Yliri ; t SIW all, It a M is Nm an taW1W Maa am bw r Y14r1 q{,•t C "own aas . , Is IN trlYr/l Ilr r Mar SUW Y foot NM. at.stYWratYl�l t.trll.a lacer shm.. h r of 1141 : wM• ri�yyrr'g r�..1M"Y :lii f.'ri:oi'iai of ran I= a Natrr r 14 M r law 'lt• M ril Milallr. fSf��nll,VWp�la0000aah 11WraM k NM, Ya �Y.IPr Mla Yr1W r hurt Ilr N alit �Slrar. as NYY�V p Ynik Y to; oolt of Oft $41 as as W Y.V�tlyy YYW 111=6 f! Iwlf. 1 ralllaln ad r all tart. alt a r1fa11y11a. r Y i�trriarW •iraM ,.alii .�Y iYl rYr�W a OMMI r'� .i p /I,. I .WiYW. woo Its atrlalrl �a ar al w tall 9w W NM r " w Yt bw IYIt man, al�la as 1 Mtn aia YN Misr a✓ mall cell@ hw arra Y Yk giMr r1 w9 Mt NMaaf M all l� W lanr N YInINaa W Urea aanla rWi /roalr. VW, ar • Il�lr araNtiw r YY :�r� M W M� W brYa tall aYa W r r w% a tar r NIl 1� toss, W %NJ /a}' r 1Y Wtra of Na 9.nal a.wr Yr aYMlar. W Wll "I W avY ==%:% Ya 1Ywa W rtfr M W woman W r Ya. W tr "Muir Y If Wa lNr r I� all lrlatlarN. Law" rla —yd lam i cm IF �CWtl %w- STAN OP UASPMU r. taaln r WNW A W sal rftalal oat. M _l1wVw tales r. a at� RNk k w fr saw Star. �� Mewl gar N r Iw llwr �lY W rN N IaaY�• YI /alrrl Irr la r ,la�larl�)�r/ N W llnra W WI of alnelrrar rr rr rr1/rW sett W 1` .a i J Willa. tWl�r fOr , aai 1aOYa tMY tall[ NA aamaarra t1Y� far afa Vr lllal .w w ti�111f1' 0 L1 /oO1i 911 sd_•rr�_` a�ri �u Itatarrlrl [21T -i11Ff ___ or " "T�'� aftY 1NM� elm r aNt, rYatr S. a WIrYIYY(wYatl ►IW nrhlrw/ Y Y'rrW' aaarMl Y 7rt� ). m al�� W�o.1 "w �1 Ir Y YII�Iakilr irlifal,M i1Y�yiM/ a�w i I�sk�r Mine. � a l r��rtr/9wrM wr����!la!�fs.'rMalrfr'). a�kti" Of AM. 311,11, a /alr,uW WYI na IM/rryptlfntrllt� wMait r a rlrrr k/Y �aMfal. a�ofw M tla lVIM M loon. Mr w1Yk a rka M so mo lift, M w r Y W lltaa0a imm r iri. Y /aa a p 1asr,/ r lam i. R� Y M No. YaYr r Yk CNOV. saw 'w" win 11aV�raY Yliri ; t SIW all, It a M is Nm an taW1W Maa am bw r Y14r1 q{,•t C "own aas . , Is IN trlYr/l Ilr r Mar SUW Y foot NM. at.stYWratYl�l t.trll.a lacer shm.. h r of 1141 : wM• ri�yyrr'g r�..1M"Y :lii f.'ri:oi'iai of ran I= a Natrr r 14 M r law 'lt• M ril Milallr. fSf��nll,VWp�la0000aah 11WraM k NM, Ya �Y.IPr Mla Yr1W r hurt Ilr N alit �Slrar. as NYY�V p Ynik Y to; oolt of Oft $41 as as W Y.V�tlyy YYW 111=6 f! Iwlf. 1 ralllaln ad r all tart. alt a r1fa11y11a. r Y i�trriarW •iraM ,.alii .�Y iYl rYr�W a OMMI r'� .i p /I,. I .WiYW. woo Its atrlalrl �a ar al w tall 9w W NM r " w Yt bw IYIt man, al�la as 1 Mtn aia YN Misr a✓ mall cell@ hw arra Y Yk giMr r1 w9 Mt NMaaf M all l� W lanr N YInINaa W Urea aanla rWi /roalr. VW, ar • Il�lr araNtiw r YY :�r� M W M� W brYa tall aYa W r r w% a tar r NIl 1� toss, W %NJ /a}' r 1Y Wtra of Na 9.nal a.wr Yr aYMlar. W Wll "I W avY ==%:% Ya 1Ywa W rtfr M W woman W r Ya. W tr "Muir Y If Wa lNr r I� all lrlatlarN. Law" rla —yd lam i cm IF �CWtl %w- STAN OP UASPMU r. taaln r WNW A W sal rftalal oat. M _l1wVw tales r. a at� RNk k w fr saw Star. �� Mewl gar N r Iw llwr �lY W rN N IaaY�• YI /alrrl Irr la r ,la�larl�)�r/ N W llnra W WI of alnelrrar rr rr rr1/rW sett W 1` .a i x a r : CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 01 Q58 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer B': Malt Stickney, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the standard contract between the City and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for the funding of Phase I of the DAY Creek Improvement Project construction. RECD MDATION: It Is between the City and that the City the San Bernardino iCounty Flood Control attached trictfor the funding of Phase I of the Day Creek Improvement Project. Background /Analysis Phase I of the Day Creek Improvement Project consists of the construction of a debris dam across DAY Credo at he mouth of Day Canyon and approxtmately one mile of concrete channel to the south. The cost of construction of Phase I will be for an amwwnt not to exceed ten million dollars !f10,000 ,000j with construction for the phase beginning in April Of this year and continuing for a period of one year. The attached contract provides for the City's contribution toward the funding of 'Phase I and the Flood eQntrol District's ob1199at1on to administer that phase of the project. the project will be fuadtd by the Day Craek.Mello Roos Assessment District. The Day Creek ImVrovem1At Project will be constructed in three phases within the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario with the entire project expected to last a period of 3 1/2 years. Respectfu submitted, • w Attachments 4 G. i t VPF75? .. SAN h[IIIIA11D1(p COIMTY FLOOD cowmm DIBTRH:T r•r... "...+ STANDARD CONTRACT D:f Gtul Itl *% ! � ..✓' 1011 WtITi;ICT US! DULY THIS CONTRACT N entered Into In tM I max Control Obtrkt, hersshw called the Dkw;m ww Ctllbrnla by +nd e»ntaan the San Belnwdino Caw, ry Ftoad -- twrrh/rcalled cle. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: e eeldrw swsatwas Srr esmmrweePW@NMMaISr►na�c tle+e � emaMMar, beeeaf'aMria M M@at eeWeae/aaA„ y�,� �/tsW M auwrsawys, eeM, a"ev ow x1mmumm Whereas. District and City are dssirous of vadortaktnS 1arrovament of the overall Day Creek ryseea, which is scheduled to be cOutructad is thr" phases over a three Year period at an estiaatad test of aPProsLately ;AZ aillion; and, Where ". Plans and spactfl ations for phase I construction of the ProJett haws been Completed; and, improvement Whersaa. City, by vir'_us of its Radevelopeaat Alen_ (1tDA) and/or 1411o• Assassewnt District, hu sufficient fume to pay for acid phue I const"etion; IIOSs and, What@". City La villioB to provide to District said funds to pay Y.or phase I construction; and. contracct; t; W District is vtllin& to accept said fonds and adatnister the Construction sew Cues 3�- r "oo" rhar1tora, to I'll" 1. 01A� et.411: to � tually C8read u tolleye. tftp P� rtoq oorela• tar •detatet•r • T. Acc•Dt fr • r `��aatr'uettoo et cthe Contract. Coal `th t y crook lCCIudtng a+tca ruCejca con aceclose t_ �rovyeat Vlltoq u act letty•ce' toelua t• Pay alI ee 3. Ft�e rk4 con k� (:20 „p,0 CVO) l abaft .toms order ad co4d rtth eh• Pral ee ooat t set17atton aaryteae sad utrat ace to •xee ' city a h/Dta rice a`raArlaearahalleve that the 01acp•etion of a a halt: aa�eat. ba f--dad by city Cr k prole taproreacar to, attty end sat forth t'Lo•Rej and to l'*r °a ►!eq eh•~ D'4trtet pt au e oo�nt Drajace erratton Caner `na /er N b� �� tyr acres Day rook ud. tab. trer••yn` . ^"a un� 4*co•e.* 1 crook 31 2 d) App !!Stole rai •y eraeett oolrf alalot laPro si creak fiaa• aPP•r ep�r.Ce�aetod IdakrL oncretee��ra °aaaC4; tawr outaw Round, A.Ater c aham.l J Debris p a o�t4. to o�r• 1 •roo' °raos�tton bpaa does to Jp ” CT fit~ u the 1pa located bidder tet•�Snelan Oe °'ands sad Aa eeaatruett to eh• do It Chat as else, Ga total btd Croak c4sa•l a PSage for Cai tr t+pr l edaC44h ch�• oo a rest bea��phas Z pt�elaCt re pot• pT.k a b• °�'uat pre d and W r of ebe aeCount I •ettKttoo p lace ed p dr a f rC►eded to the Abd•. A c �aaly for beat 48001f' srCr of ae rN Ths l a thI li 4 'ti @halltrp7, amounts o eha aaatblylac ount 84ta�4 vl�t Resaint chadula Pre to ;=,k;• bCeyeea eba COC1tr and d =street �c a Pacltt•d to the Sur. eh• VI �.� au °f ;acl rdaaea y ek * t aaseten, the i��� Y moot to the as wnt rOauired may be aado to allow for ucuoulated interest earnings $ project "counts administered by thn district. All fiords raMsinln9 after payment o/ all phase I cats will revert to the City i ,; d• Dpon 4termtmation of tbu total phase I bid amount, provide to district tan parent (101) Of that amount for deposit in an intfrast hearing conttngeoty aeeowt fo favor of the district at a bank wk!eh is a Comber Of the podesal Reserve. "twat shall be identified amt need expressly for holding phone I Day Crook imprevoment prej "t coutinµ oy funds. A copy of the "mthly "count sta vowtn will be provided to the City. the district shall sea the eontlngmwy fade to smet ixr ' costs renal easM project ttng from contract °haago orders provided the City has exhwsad project foods specified in paragraph 3. The be Wed by the dLtrict to most the City °bligsti Contingency fun" Cal also smwnta !a the u3U41 Ac p:atide ," the y turroneo that uawal eoadttiena prealWo she City free mabtng a pgmeet. All Amdo remaining ups cemclusicm er pheao I will revert to the City. 7 provide any additional short -falls in claims, or other uvfereseon project rslatedcosy. dun to change orders, d provide en -gstng coordination by City staff in nattors dealing with City facilities uyor City natgrs including review e1 ate. Affecting cgs orders elates, �i the lmpravwmt project. �• it is further understood ud agread: 9 pgmwt to contractor shall be snide in accotdawo with the forth is the &ream of 4alemstion repayment prey got f set in the eona agr«..ot end u set forth tvwtieo contract. To Complete payment to contractor. the County will establish an Witional podoral Reserve Account fate which �° monthly contributions are mode ` . y the City' is Acardsuee With the peMral .rt loam advasrms AN set forth to the federal ropyssmt aireamomt. A,eepy e1� t' the monthly sca°eet ■tstammeto will be provided to the City. i4 a� page 3 of 5 11. 30. e� %� of en= for ��t� D truon is lataadod G be � Initial -. all e Day Cresk� roll for sad including the Debris aM imlu Including rslds 2"ift north 'hall M 1M total rch G Provided jointly by the cities of for the overall Pr r -°e USXLWM contribution by the City of LuWj.o Cue:r� Ranch, CuCOOOga. Caste Loci , and uMi� all Cities• caaG uaocLGd with for the overall the zapaynent of Federal (gurerl o! Project Reeled the Cosssml Proceeds from �7 Crook Itello.saea pmt or ssnusy generated frame � Claaatlon) loan shall not Yet enc laareneat'asi A"PuuL met Mo, d4-1 and frog a�Dortion et and City ssrnded -day a2y, lfpd betesan-tha Ca.wty of "t he• 82-171 of gaaebo ♦ ,ubssqu,( Weeneat will into gasast be entered bet1p a the qty of fan of b Federal l�1 to the V,S, �ntC h to Provide tar rsDayaett the d, by Cam the C'esh e�lCCndution, o! the repayment agreyen t accordance rich 7hIA will g with eneral respect fvod 1, adequately Fed, al loan rapgrnt: & the put on tm'alvsmegp adaWaGly handiM. _ and i+4+et °° the County 7%ja aRsamemt +hall be bidjag L successor, said es,l See . °pan all Pardo, berets and yet ebatr lbs City shall bees access to Project e _ finamlal for revive, . f Moe n authorized personnel. � Purpose of +.Muting tlnaneial �' be ohtaLud by re �°�' COP7 of the ceytt.teSoe of lt. free the n trol. alert the data In pass 's but ae latarethan a Pis ric will LOvide a d dat writing seoy u i _ Fege 4 of f 13. 30. e� %� of en= for ��t� D truon is lataadod G be � Initial -. all e Day Cresk� roll for sad including the Debris aM imlu Including rslds 2"ift north 'hall M 1M total rch G Provided jointly by the cities of for the overall Pr r -°e USXLWM contribution by the City of LuWj.o Cue:r� Ranch, CuCOOOga. Caste Loci , and uMi� all Cities• caaG uaocLGd with for the overall the zapaynent of Federal (gurerl o! Project Reeled the Cosssml Proceeds from �7 Crook Itello.saea pmt or ssnusy generated frame � Claaatlon) loan shall not Yet enc laareneat'asi A"PuuL met Mo, d4-1 and frog a�Dortion et and City ssrnded -day a2y, lfpd betesan-tha Ca.wty of "t he• 82-171 of gaaebo ♦ ,ubssqu,( Weeneat will into gasast be entered bet1p a the qty of fan of b Federal l�1 to the V,S, �ntC h to Provide tar rsDayaett the d, by Cam the C'esh e�lCCndution, o! the repayment agreyen t accordance rich 7hIA will g with eneral respect fvod 1, adequately Fed, al loan rapgrnt: & the put on tm'alvsmegp adaWaGly handiM. _ and i+4+et °° the County 7%ja aRsamemt +hall be bidjag L successor, said es,l See . °pan all Pardo, berets and yet ebatr lbs City shall bees access to Project e _ finamlal for revive, . f Moe n authorized personnel. � Purpose of +.Muting tlnaneial �' be ohtaLud by re �°�' COP7 of the ceytt.teSoe of lt. free the n trol. alert the data In pass 's but ae latarethan a Pis ric will LOvide a d dat writing seoy u i _ Fege 4 of f 14 This agreement shall terainate upon completion of the project conettuction and the final Kcoumting. In Viruses Thereoft the parties hereto have caused their respective names to be hereunto subscribed and their respective goals to be hara mto affixed by their respective proper officers thereunto duly authorised. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT rmen, p we.re.e.•we... iee...w Dew BY 0. - ATTESTED: O'er ► Title Setnxay of tM Flmed Control DWuict Ad*m ; .!• Mwwe�M(`7 ewheee�YA11Y�ye,e a.yF. . a�eew M1t�e tW ► a.' j Or• DOW--- 'Y�• elleMMR sea 11IM 'q"r�ti^WewwcAO _ t4t'r S Or ���� 'i" y yes CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1907 TO: city Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ABJECT: Accepting a Real Property and Improvement Contract and Lein Agrement and approval of Parcel Map 8901 located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Central Avenue, Submitted by Kelbert Partnership. ` RECO MDATIOR i > It is recoewended that City Council adapt the attached resolution approving Parcel Kip MI. accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract aai Lein Agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis /Background Parcel Map 8901 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 9, 1985, for the division of 10 acres of land into 2 parcels in the General Comnercial and Industrial Spicific Plan Development District located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Central Avenue. A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lein Agreement has been submitted for - the Median Island on Foothill Boulevard, all other Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permiit issuance. Attachmen•s F ' t Yn.v_ •�h �R.; ��r 1. "�. �. 1 V CITY OF UNCHO CUCAMCNGA Mmrn o DNM()N - Ye m Tzna PAACEI MAP B (f F" RECORDING REWESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 REAL FROFERTY 1100M OT CMTRACT AND LII M AMEBST THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this �?d V` day of sTaNV ae Y _ 19—D—, by and between Ke��tr Tai Da.rTNfr4�.��, (hereinafter referred to as 'Developer"), and the MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'City), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the recordation of Parcel Map 8901, the City requires the construction of missing off -site street improvements Including one -half 112 the median Island adjacent to the property to be developed; and V WHEREAS. the Developer desires to postpone construction of such Improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; cnd WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that t.4e a Developer enters Into this Ap,~t requiring the Developer to construct said Improvements, at no expemse to the City, after demand to do so by tMe City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said 1 1 shalt all have men a I if the Developer falls or neglects to do so and that the City h lien upon the real Property hereinafter describe the DeveloPerl% Performance, and aril, rePayeent due City, d as security for ROW. THEREFORE, THE PAgTSES AGREE: i• The Developer hereby agrees that he will last&,) off - *rovem"ts including one -half 1/2 the median island site street accordance and c on Foothill Boulevard in ompllance with all +PP1le and regulations able ordinances resolutions, rules of the City 1n effect at the time of the installation, Said laproveaents shall be installed LTOn and along Footh.rll goulev' --d, not to exceed beyond the cente,rine of said street or beyond the frontage of the subject Property except as requirad to Provide for adegzJnte drainage aed traffic transiticn Per City Standards, 21 The installation of said i�proveeents shall be coWleted no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to ceraaence lnstallatlon of the Saco, lnstallatlon of said 1ipro+mants shall be It no expense to tre City. 3, in the event the Developer shall fall or refuse to cosptete thtr a lnstallatlon of said 1 _t �rovaabrrtt in a timely armor. City ally at cry time thereafter, upon giving the Developer wrlttea notice of its intention to m do SO. enter upon the Property hereinafter described t faprovements and recover all eocts of c and complete said OeveloPer, Each a�letfon incurred 6y the City from the Parcel created by recordation of said map shall to subject to ' a Prorated amount on a Per aero basis, "( ' 2 r a 4, To re Mh)chf°4 s of this 9 eeWnhe Performance b " nded t end Y the C'ev 9011 0 PsveloPer heu Sy Cfty jr, cto secure the rep 0loper of ani conr nder, the rtyel� letlp.9 sold f e rer°s and situ 4Y to �n to City of v CallfoM In Cf�y Of Ctty' in trust does by these P e4ants upon *fault funds iiads, Po9esJ� !t: that Pho �C�1Sa �+0 follpging drscOnbS grant, bargbY °nd S) l/I sL.cords off Cot 4. r c Hof $an &rnard1redI Property, S• )ills San ftei77ardi �2. retO7�ad o, state of 6, ttor caare}.�ce is is trust for � � C04n'sY. Calttornf�k 34 °/ the acts and - . th0refo"t tt Purposes dtscr respl; be void, other! to be done osvorp, shall fa/ f " above and the rightll be Ca'slder d shot) rp�elaµn. Agre4ent, telly par fo� all of tre agoverned by the p o oblI atlo, the Rod as a sprtf °rce and tlfKts �Mvoy�e and I Cher 4pplfcable statute, In fay PC04 the ith Pft i'khata) roPertyI baneflt o'them)s Mre�nt .ntny to uertgages r0a1 Of Caltl rnfaal+nd be Pr each of tl4 Pcrt f 'Irs, a rcutpr ?� -hall a� siM1n,1 u a� °Party. a5r 9, l'o W'ators, Sue, ai inure to the Y s tgage. the to,* extent 109111 ass Of C T H" ta gagee. °� Calllo+nfe and any other, or* are sob Saortgagor•�bd of N!s Agr 7t ? the stebit0 Pertafningto the Cfvjl Code CItr slia)1 be the of J eOrtga;y on ry the stale of Promty �g .. g. If legal this A action 1s °COaenced to ahrorc e the eft' to recover a/p' sty yhfeh Devei°Per hereunder dny of tie Proylstons or Prevailing Part or t0 foreciose thehe City is entitled to atto Y •shall De antltleJ to atortgage c recovar ftga as shall tl recov the ey1R f1InlEss N11 6e war DY fire Court its eos saOrd Such reasonable F. on the day and Year fir eve ►*ltrtieS hereto have executed this Agri Cur Or C1TT OF CALiFDIWIA a CUCAtphG4 eorpordtfon a ■tnic1Pal By: nn s °y ATTEST. r PRO afar C1 y Clerk a at.� APPROVED TO %blal: reo °tr on orne Oge�t` /.� Y Po oe raea (a) »ao Yer r.L�_. /e AGO i the, * OOe to #o Cut'o I�a.QO�a�ee to, a •a yahr�J•����•G� OW �a too. Aro that ZU )at be tee• ,, Peso re no "r 11114 ree)fher ea /yoalA to e+e / pa'OOar .-, 84n, rlartejr as they ,ar? r +tea 0�_YrOi �tgt`•h�41e01 4 RESOLUTION M0. 77-0t/5' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ArPROVIN6 PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8901 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8901) a Partnership �And Consistingeof Parcel located�atltheubmitted- cornaraof Foothill Boulevard and Central Avenue, being a division of 4-portion of Lot 4 Tract 2202, recorded In Book 34 of Maps, Pages 67 and 67 112; in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, was approved by the Planning Commission Of the City of Rancho Cucasonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6901 is the final sap of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and Y WHEREAS, All 'of the requirements established as prerequisite to r approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been set. Rancho Cucamonga, California. ,lth tEs�id�ParcelhMap Number 8901 be aMethetsaw is hereby approved and the City Engineer 1s authorized to present sale to the + County Recorder to be filed for record. O� s 1. h 13 y '.t6 ��w�'�Ar3 �p 1 RESOLUTION NO. 77-0Yf 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA; CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEU AGREEMENT FROM KELBERT PARTNERSHIP FOR PARCEL MAP 8901 AND AUTHORIZINS THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Nap 8901, located at the northeast ccrner of Foothill Boulevard and Central Avenue, submitted by Kelbert Partnership, was approved on January 21, 1987; and WHEREAS, Installation of Median Island on Foothill Boulevard established as prerequisite to recording of Parcel Nap 8901, has been set by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Kelbert Partnership. NW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ac':ept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sale, end directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 4 r• r .n i� yr t�y'S�:Y4 Zid t 9 d- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 90 p a T0: City Council and City tanager E im° FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael 0. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: tpprove and execute Professional Service Agreement with Construction Inspection and Administration for Civil Engineering (CIA) for the inspection and contract omnagement of the following individual pro$ectF: Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad; Three Traffic Signal at Various Locations; and the Residential Street Rehabilitation, Phase IC (Slurry -&--al). RECOPMEATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with CIA for the inspection and construction owagamant of the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Three Traffic Signals at Various Locations, and the Residential Street Rehabilitation, Phase II (Slurry Seal) authorize the Administrative Services Director to expand $19,611.00 to be funded as follows: $11,225.00 from S.B. 325 and S35,386.00 from Systems De.tlopment. Backgrcund;Aialysis Due to the pace at which these projects proceeded, staff could obtain only one proposal for services necessary. Consruction Inspection and Administration, Civil Engineering submitted proposals for said work. The proposals have been revlewaJ by staff and found to be acceptable. Respectfully submitted, C Attachment 10, r i. 4;19 km P PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEWNT This Agreement is made and entered into this 4th day of _ February 1987_. between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and Construction Inspection and Administration Civil Engineering herein referred to as C.I.A. (hereinafter referred to as ' CONSULTMT'). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professtnnrl services with respect to the preparation of inspection and contract administration of the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Three (3) Traffic Signals at various Locations and the Residential Street Rehabilitation P1aa II (Slurry Seal) - ('Project' hereafter). (ti) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. s (111) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render edvl.;e : +i assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and straf in the preparation of Project. (1v) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is wilting to perform such professional services as hereinafter F defined• $ NON, THEREFORE, it 1s agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as r, follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions* The following definitions shall apply to the•, ; ;•�.; ,r s. 4r.?. following terms, except where the context of this Agrearnt otMnmisi:+•" 'zR�•4•q�Eu";,':r;�a:.Y -.n. tR ...?r, F7-F., / 1° �-. _ �;'r«'af:.77,�{^.�ri2 ■' 0. �. requires: (a) Project: The preparation of insoecttdn and construction administration described in Exhibit 'A' Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to. the preparation of ups, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, ups, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and sll work sessions, public hearings and cther meetings conducted by CITY nth respect to tin project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Servlcas: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Project The date of coTletion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, ups, surveys, Plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANTs at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for const- action is sat forth in Erhl:,it 00' Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the Project in accordance with Exhibit 'A' and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all ups, surveys, reports. Plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as ' docuunts') includinq all supplemental technical do ~ts, as described in Exhibit 'A' to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Erhlblt -2- 1i 7 484• Copies of the Exhibit •A`, CtiY dnuaents shall WY thereafter be in such numbers as are regardln9 said documents and required by uments and C t °rxard W COdLSUL7ANT to said docueentc ONStliTUtT shall coam is thereafter make such revisions documents in such f as are teemed necessary, The form and fn CM shall receive time limits set forth quantities determined Sh revised a wrltten approval to this Section BZ,�b) neCessary by CzTr. DProvat of CtTY, Say be extended upon expense. secure ic) CONSULTANT sbsll, at CONSULTANT, be and hire such CONSIVANi's Oche to comply with the sterns of •U• is the leopini n of Cost And event any such th warrants Persons are retalned b this Agreement. that such In the mega {mad Persons shall y CONSULTANT• CONSULTANT hereby hereunder. M Polly 4ualiffed retained by COMStFLT CONSULTANT further to Perform services except u agrees that to subcontractor shall be 3• CITY wrlLten aDP .val Of Cl'. a rees as follows: for the ia) io Pay CONSULT Derforsynce op � the cost of sort ices a m+xlp sue of t2 61 all staff tis4 and all r1quired hereunder. This including the other direct sun shaTl cover CONSIXT,�' payment of eeyloyees, Consultants Ind indirect costs or tees, to CONSULTANT. and subcontractors the schedule sett CITY. shall be to E forth in Exhibit `C•, made in accordance with accordance wt ib) paments t0 COMS{q T is the invoices submitted p shail such invoices shall be within y CONSULTANT ~� by CtiY to r P., received by CITY. Al? Paid e reasonable t1 • n a monthlY basis, ind f respect to hourly rate, corrges shall a detailed imeExAfter "'d invoices;ara „ 4 Ca Y;f . lie`s lump Sun amounts for individual tasks, r Mk' ` event, however, will said invoices exceed 95f of individucl task totals described in Exhibits 'A' and 'CO. required (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be to PAY to CONSULTANT any s a in excess of 95% of the maxlmsw P+y+ble hereunder prior to receipt Dy CITY of all final d suDPieaYntal teehrticai docwents ocuments• together with all content to CITY +s described herein acceptatle in fors and , Final P"At shall be aide not later than Presentation of final dausents and Acceptance days after fd) Additional services: P nce thereof by CITY. requested P"nts for additional in writing, by CITY, and not included i services set forth in Exhibit ' • n kODe of Services as A hereof. shall be paid on a rei+bursoftnt accordance With the basis in additional fee ashedule sat forth 1n Exhibit ` services shall -I invoiced on C • Charges for CITY wf:hin a a ftnthlY basis and shall be Paid by reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4• CITY a reas to roride (a) In hereto, cation to COMSU YANi: and assistance as set forth in Exhibit 'A' (b) Photographically reproducible c lnforactfon, 1P available, which CCNSOLTAMT opias of maps and other complete the project. considers necessary in order to (c) Such information as is 9eaerally available from CITY files aPPlicabla to the Project. L from other f tai Assistance, if necessary, in obta/nir9 information 9overnmkn agencies and/or CONSULTANT' S ram Drivate parties. However, it shad be ", 4 N P°nsibllity to make all initial gathering of such information. contact with respect to the' :4d -4- S• Owners" of Documents surveys, drawings, Na s All documents, data D , models, studies, CONSULTANT Photographs and reports prepared b pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered Y and, upon PdYment for services the Property of CITY other identified Performed by CONSULTANT. such documents and materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT xey- however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials ms CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or aro alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY' Its staff or authorized agents w(Lhout � specific mitten consent of the ha.-al ss shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agues to hold ha,.less and indemnify the CONSULTANi egalnst all claims and losses including defense costs arising out of dny such alteration muse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This the giving of a wri agreement ,y be terminated by CITY upon } (1S) d s [ten Notice of 7armination` to CONSULTANT at least fifteen iY prior evens this Agreaeato the data of termination specified In said Notice. In the nt is so terminated. CONSULTANr shall be c ? CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as sat forth in Exhibit `Bo!pensated at rata basis with respect to the percentage of . on a pro- date of teralnatlon. In the Project cocgleted as of the no oven[, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more The maxfapa specified in ,aragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT than CITY a, and documents, data ANT shall provide to U' all d Photographs and re whether studies, vmvays. drawings, Naps, modals, ports, in daft or final fora, praPared by p � G i CONSULTANT as of date of termfdation. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Oesignated Representatives: Any and ell notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named ' individials, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Michael O. Lona, Senior Public Works Inspector and Hatch Bedrosian. principal for C.I.A. Any such notices, demands, Invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (i8) hours after deposit thereof in the United States +ail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. S. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a &&contract until all insurance required , of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: ■ (a) Worker's Cammensatfon Insurance: Before beginning e r work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractcrs in carrying out the wort specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California., g.c �- V' In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code ;. Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his p. y �. -6 '4,T , employeas. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I r aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with su';h provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement ". (b) Public Liability and Property Drape: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, to full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claim and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protectionl of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,040.00) for property dsmage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at ail times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ("malpractice ") providing protection of at least $250.000.00 for errors and omissions ('malpractice ") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in u? x responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as .� +, Iv additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the Policies am primary and noncontributing with arty insurance flat may be married by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed ex thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by r certified mall. except cept after shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies Promptly upon receipt of them. or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may 'effect for its mm account insurance not required under this Agri x nt. g• Indemnification. CONSULTANT save harmless CITY shall defend, tnde�rify and Its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees' from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or Property, including the Payment by CoN,ULiANT of any and all legal Costs and attorneys' fees, 1n may sneer arising r:rt of any neglig willful acts or omissions of the CONSUL ent or lntentfonal or TANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not ,felted to, all consequential damages, to LM maximum extent Permitted by law. 10. Ass1°n4nt1: No assignment of this Agrac part or Obligation of nent or of av Performance hereunder shall be made, either 1" *010 or 1n part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. I__Peadent Contractor_: 7 ' CONSULTANT and its employers. M Parties hereto agree that under and agents are independent contractor`s this Agreement and shall not be construed for a ,. employees of CITY. AY purpoie to be 12, 6�vernl��Law: This Agreement shall be governed by an4 ' ME , construed in accor ,rest, 13. dater with the of the State Of California. Attar toted to enforcr , Fees: In the event Party in said legal RY term or Provision of the Aar legal Pr"ceeditg fs and costs P Proceedfng shall be entitl grooment, the prevailing reasonable, from the aPPosing Part. In ed to recover attar an amount determined by the Cot" to be Other agreements, 1�' Entire A reMent: This to Mter r Ord) o ng. br omont to aqy and a)1 the au in Poredet no re fate Y herein. Each Party to this the Psrtfe with respect Preset � by Party ketch is not aaygdf� ogreosknt, s embodied ackn°1YledgeS that valid end bf tInaoent, or Proof nor nding, s• not cotta, herein MY modification of nod in this A aro other If 1t is in wrltfng s) this A greaomnt shall be TNESS fined by all part,@$. g „ssoent shall b@ effective on) !N NI W, Y as of the the Parties he QtY and year first set forth th above: to bavo executed this Agreement CITY DF �� C ATTEST: y u • 4Ya, ev,e y ut eo. @ _ V9T Date: Date: Approved as to form: I l EXHIBIT 'V SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant shall provide and /or maintain Project Administration, Project Inspection, Construction Files, Construction Surveys, As Built Plans and Sails and Materials Testing based on the City's method of project management. The original construction files along with the original and 5 copies of the final report shall be submitted to the City as designated to paragraph 2(b), One (1) each of the 'Weekly Statement of Working Days' and a project progress report shall be submitted to the City on a weekly bassi beginning one week after the date specified In the "Notice to Proceed% Reimbursement for services rendered shall be made every 30 days with final payment being made within 60 days after completion of services designated herein. w •j rp. '.e. SAS � -• t ti :g F EXHIBIT •B• PROJECT SCHECKE The Consultants active Participation 1. tMs project shell begin at the construction meeting and shall end upon final acceptance by the C1ty, Project files P ante of the Final Report City no later than and the final report shall 20 days after final be submitted to the pro be acceptance by the City Council. 1. a IF ♦ qt lv C1i I CONSTB w APPENDIX 'C• cow tic INlrlCTION lTRATiON CIVIL[NOINaaaINO Dsco■ber 24, 1985 Hr. Hiehael Long sanlor Public Works InaPactor city of Rancho Cncaaonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cu'"Onga, CA, 91730 SDSTECPt Proposal for Contract ldainistration/Observation - Construction of Traltic Signals at Tbree Location, Dear xr. Longs r Lnginssnnae to theofTL'aaLflo Sign�l� at�pi� services for 'i the Construction r. sated co■tgf consultants has prepared the attached Locations, C.I.A. arvica■. Proposal of .e■ti- L have .:arsiull 7ra�onaan locations of the Proposed work Plan■, ■Peoial and ■ ecilication■ tect. Th.s Proposal is for qualppiiet Partaining to hae nd all the ratlstactory, co■plation o1 theY control ins"Otion required Ptor Project. Thank you Lor the opportunity to submit this proposal. I h it will seat rith your approval am we ■aY Proceed rlth the control SnsPectlOn. oqu that quality f Very truly yours, xOtch n.n:o PrinClpal C.L.E. xngi=�eeting Consultants i iv 1: + 9587 Arrow Highway. Sun*j • RanchoCL-cam 2197CelliRlscoso • Th"IlandOaks, 91730 • (714) 089,4755 r v • (805) 529.7148 i i L ;i a �+ I WIN 't) OMB a>�Nataw _ { — 92maa UMAM CONS TAU TZ N ZOO paZw(AL/ Contract A �L Pre-17oy � atratio.Vpbaaryatlon Pro act Yaating Ran 4ant 9ar _ of arre sinii aa� total =i is rRs. ja ratt„at'm i o Q.so i du`�+� �alatratSa�ODa i_� Sourly r �atloa Comte - ottiaataatba ara t1 - noratl oJUY, �� quotatioy .. Upon exper In lalrr�arpgiib� tanta vil2 waft 1 f "� bouts 4. Prlora O11 notA� � �Y stat�nator,'- =aarm caapinr tba aatiaat0 or vO4t ! } �ttP ktor,, I ' a ( ^,X 9687 Tai S A� ��Ca�feRlts"aa. n,q oIIUCS�.-- 91730. . Appmlx C0 (con-0 %- 40CONSTRUCTION lHancT10N ANDADMINISMTION CmLaaasaa111Na 1 December 17, 1966 Mr. Michael Long Senior public Works Inspector City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Have Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SDATLCTS proposal for Contract AdMWStration /Observation, Construction Survey, and Xaterial Testing - Improvement of Archibald Avenue Deer Mr. Longs In response to the request for a quotation to provide services for the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Railrrad Crossing north Of sth Street, C.I.A. I ginearing Consultants has prepared the attached proposal of estimated cost for services. I have carefully examined the location of the proposed work and all plans, special provisions and specifications pertaining to the pro- ject. The proposal includes the survey, material toting and qual- ity control inspection required for the satisfactory completion of the project. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. I hope that it will •t with your approval and we may proceed with the survey, material tasting, and quality control inspection. very truly yours, otch sadrosir• , Principal C.I.A. Ltyiniwing Consultants 997 Anow H4hwsy, Suite J • Rancho CucamoN& CA 91730 • (714) 669.4765 2197CaNsRWcoso • ThouwMOaks6CA91362 • (603)628.7146 iy e I CIV1L60a1saaMMa nip 11=3= JLTM= at Atokisoa, Topeka a Santa Fe lailroad Craa0ia9 North of Sth street PP0228A IT22M A. Contract 7uminiatratioif/Obserntion Pra -Job XNting & Project Manager - 40 Lira. 8 $40.00 OfLide t Inspector - 190 8rs. 8 1138.70 l 6.16Q•� Final Report e! 30 Sra. 8 $30.00 =_ 600.29 Total lstisated h &Ltaistratioy0bsa"%tiea Coate. O 1.196.60 f 0 , 9507 Arrow Highway, BuftN J • Rancho Cueam wlr^ CA 91730 • (711) 9694785 2197CaGiRlesapy�0 fiareuWCskkCA91382a(808)529.7118 1 B. Contract Construction survey curb, Gutter, and Street Isproveaauts - Sstlsatel Regltirut >] ]•f00•a� C. Contract Xatarial Toting Unit Cwt t Total 8 1a. C4pL ation Teets 7 Its. Mutiaaa 0ralsitF. Tests i as.y9 =X60.00 4` an 1 La. Certilicatiea Ra pots DaOei 000.00 �,` }Y g r, Total Ra .Material Teat Cbete } }ti.. 1.161.68 Total 2stiaaWWOoptract Proposal Casts � (Total o! Itiii "A, s and C above) /1a.arl.es. ty.. f 0 , 9507 Arrow Highway, BuftN J • Rancho Cueam wlr^ CA 91730 • (711) 9694785 2197CaGiRlesapy�0 fiareuWCskkCA91382a(808)529.7118 1 't) c°"�01m1 rr October 2s . 1986 BMSo�ta zi Cl ty of lto Mor 0oacullne Rcadc &*Drgi otor sUbjactt caso a� CA 91730 street coon xana Dear }�. 14flgt Robabilitat am'snan prop", u for Rind I gas Mont a altt Pbaaa II 'ntial aarvi irq a The aratMad err tthe Cjttr or Pr°vldIn4 00 vi Plans +Ad aDsoit! o cuc�Ono�A !on .'n. a.z.A. and SaaDaotadcationa here bun the aboty tta taa ut^iilooss to COnaylt[ata amen" am the &Ita(s) that aonitor Provl to r rlda t' aP+lida'a ai Q toai"i"ta�ci tY o°ttro�i ad to orr Yaant Lattaati(s� �ticaLi°�L'aylloilitj' and°tt0otiayhr DaT nIt r ai��. and cl X31 1taDort o Mtthe 14iactuDar� to 4uanti ' for cracy�_aulinQ. the x�° ' ax!„ ura for Dat Nua Pay chin am measure for Xo�^ T+aatltiy, r°uval am t r raDlacaaant ho� ud replacement of as P.C.C. " Yial��zai;. * 11catlon curb and gutter. too��4 aatai�r �tas9uiy tonnasd PAltd for td1clyua applied t� 0.10 oot. A.C. A Quay ro, ytain �1ly ��� on steward city of Ranebo Cu caaon4a 2r .' -; a42107C�pY8ulteJ. 1p .. , boo . ? �.- CUM, ADMINISTRAT/ar �' m c [wmwaaawq Xlke ng PrOft,wal tlooho Cuca ftnV Page 2= 29, 1986 traction HS-n. -gamlent contt @ctorP�caaa tatiyata ! �a? as ra4ntrad for Prepare rina l ?Ojt of C°nytru Pyaant of tha Pp UTXCjr cton aw 84410 ins �aMctlon 1Pan6ituraa. i3�o v �thrate 84 r $338 ror this vrolact are the pruoject a a�a Oath Phour roject ur W ClarA p�ut��� ill b be MOrkin9 AaDrov2gad e�raotlon at n tzuct2on Yai Sa ear tollovarat2on�lri C2arltc*r Ties -Kna9ar Pr oject ao Hour lnal AsPort °j 23 Hours j ?23.00 Total Constrt0tion ZnSJL 9'asant or a Cir t ZnapaOtOr 2 ura Totl rnDctlon $ o urs 1 $36.00 $38.00 -Om iar3aprrn san, Very truly yours, I PrinciP2* oaian C.S.A. tnQlnaarng Conaultanta Suit* J . xso • n :1.[60.00 430.00 623.00 --A:QQ $3,360.00 A9 $10,336.00 9• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February t, 1987 9' R TD; City Council and City Mans L977 ger FROM: Russell N. Nagulre, City Engineer 8T; 81ane W. Frandsen. Senior CivfI Engineer SUBJECT: Approval f Professional Services Agrearent between the City of Prepare plan �ppeecand Wiison,andd Estimates Sh {o the Associates to eetseast and rA �19th Street to 5001 North and portion 19th be performed the intersection. The Design Services will 114 40o.00 plus at10% Contingency for an amount to exceed RF =ION' It is recommended that the attached Professional Eitlmatesbfor the CtSY Council for the Preparation of. plans, Service, e f reeeent be a 10> contingency to peeCfundedef r an mount not to exceed D$14 ,108 at and BAdtBl01i1D� the Tf1A -8 Fund. •Plus -- �_AMf1TSI5: Di Janusq• 9. 1987 three �3leperoP+bjec were received by the city Engineering of J&nul to the pro Sal Yis Nilson, Inc. Sheehan i Associates, A suseasry of the three (3) proncsets is hereto attached. Project, The lowost Proposal was snfis Investigation and T11e proposed services rill consist of surrey, and Improvement preparation of plans, speelfleatfons and estimates structural th string and Sapraveaknt of the above - mentioned project. 'la /spe tf PUY submf tted, Rfx: Attachments T �3 A |� |� � ■ � k s | � ! � � / � � 2 .| � ! � - &■ k| i © -� , .!«2! E k |! rl � a! §3 {# !In z � & k : ..� a | k | «■ •� s� %m m m . K ■k ■i § ■,.lI �!■ ■ •• a■ s« @s■ ■� ■■ mm ■■ • ! •&.. m�ƒ K«k - | %as s Big 8 9 ■ ■ |(■ ■9 ■■ ■ 2 ■ ■1 -■ &7\ |` ■ � k s | � ! � � / � � 2 .| � ! � - &■ k| i © -� , .!«2! |! rl All» a! §3 {# !In z ! || : ..� a ■ � k s | � ! � � / � s F R; :r• o. E ,T PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement I$ made and entered into this day of , 19—. betwean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and Nilson, Inc. - Sheehan A Associates (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT'). 2. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal Pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimate (P.S.4 E.) for the Amethyst Avenue Improvement from 19th Street to Soo, north, and portion of 19th Street approximately 630 linear feet east and east of intersection ('Project* hereafter). (11) COMSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (Ili) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and Is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. I. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following tares, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: J (a) Pro ect: The preparation of P.S, i E. for the Improvement Of Amethyst Avenue from 19th Street to SOU' me north, and portion of 19th Street Exhibit approximately 630 linear, feet east and west of the intersection described in "A" Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preoaratlon of maps, surveys. reports, and document oral and to writing, of such plans, maps. surveys, Presentation, both CITY as report and document to required and attendance at any and all work sessions, Public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined In the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional be performed by C cervices as a necessary to ONSOLTANnecessary in order to complete (c) Cempletton o} Proi � the project. ect The date of completion of all phases of the project, Including and ail procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical and attndao reports. meetings. oral presentations acceptance for r by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the Project construction attached hereto. is set forth in Exhibit "11' Project Schedule 2. Col(SULTANT aoreas as =: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project In accordance with Exhibit 'A" and applicable with Federal, state and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the satisfaction of CITY. reasonable (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively a 'documents ") including all supplemental techni s pl document, as described a referred to ' Exhibit "A' to CITY within the time specified in Project scheduled, Exhlblt;° in -2- ■ 'B'. Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit 'A'. CITY nay thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT stall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are dewed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such fore and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maxieas sum of $14,408_00 for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall corer the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including i the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, sMll be made in accordance with the :htdule sat forth in Exhibit 'C'. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C' either with 1 respect to hourly rates or lump sue amounts for individual tasks. In rm a rk event, horever, rill said invoices extend 955 of individual task totals described in Exhibit •A•. U CITY be p hereunder prior to (G) CONSULTANT agrees that. hat. In qulred t pay to CONSULTANT any SUN b event, shall excess of 9Sfi of the maxfew. pikyable receipt by CITY of all final doc'"nU, together With all supplemental technical docuentx, as described content to CITY. Final he acceptable to tone and POmmt shall be arde not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services; Payments for additfmal services requested, in wrftfng, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit 'A• hereof, accordance shall be paid on a rel�+rsaeent basis in grvf the fee schedule at forth in Exhibit -Co. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a Ionthly basis and shall be CITY wfthfn a reasonable time paid by after said invoices are {. CITY a roes te received by CITY. rovide te COIISIKTANT; hereto. (a) InforsitiOn and assistance as set forth in Exhibit 'A• (b) photographically reproducible copies of caps and Other information, if available, Which CONSULTANT consider er s necessary in order e co.plete the Project. to (c) Such inforeatfon as is generally available fro. CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining fnforntfon fro, other 9overneental agancfes and/or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULlANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the ' gathering of such info gz, information. '4- ar : I? t• 4Y i• a r. •Y 5. OMnlrshiL of Documents: All documents, data, studios, surveys, drawings, ups, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon PaYment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other Identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT my desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be At the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and irAmifY the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents, 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written 'Notice of Terminatton' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the data of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be Compensated at CONSULTANT'S applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit 'C', on a pro- rate basis with respect to the percentage of the project coopletM as of the date at termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximal specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, Photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by s,d -5- r CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate -this r= Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written comounicatio.s between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below narxd individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Slane W. Frandsen, in behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and Harold A. Nilson, for and in behalf of Nilson, Inc. - Sheehan A Associates, 143 S. Brea Blvd., Brea, California, ` (714) 990 -0123. Any such notices, demands, invoices and written ;. communications, by mail, shall be deamad to have been received by the V addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid aM properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtainad all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any „ subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and e maintain at all Limas during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Cawnsaton Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' •ompensaton insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California '.abor Code Section 3700, every ampioyer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: 41 em aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to ba insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement ". (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSU.TAMT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,ODO.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ( "malpractice') providing protection of at least $250,000.00 for errors and omissions ('malpractice") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance ° required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in ''w 10 1. responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs $.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' wtice by the insurer to CITY by certified aril. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of thou , or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own .ccount insurance not required under this Agram t. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from 311 liability from toss, damage or injury to oersons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not licited to, all consequential damages, to the maxisin extent permitted by law. 30. Assignment : No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. j 11. independent Contractor: Ths parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors •8• under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. \, 12. Governing Law: This Agreemart shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shalt be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the using party in an amount dmtermtned by the Court to be reasonable. i 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not emhodiad herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreaueat shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is In writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: WILS,:N, INC. - SHE MRW A ASSOCIATES s •_ 6.X. — Date: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMD'AGA Dennis L. SUN. yor ATTEST: e— v1�1. u e , er = • 73 -9- Date: x Approved as to form: .. At y 4, k a: 1. i . ADOEMOUM TO PFESSIONL SERVICES AGRE EMENT NT STREET lEFE�TA N 1T9ETRH S ECTION Addendum P1 Pursuant to the llinrbantsof n $tr Reshallnsl Regulations 9 payment of the Department subject professional Servte, .4s A 9ovarnfn 9re following De made a Part of the above the Group 3 Payment frnta Adminlstrattve Code, Title 8, o� , 1lK Availing M..es UPON Public Mores, M 2. Mork Subject to Prevailin g • su w WOrk at�raditianaField Serve to bar9aln, a�9reMe�eee�nttra aublectrto�ro Y co ac the Mien it is rnU9raI to the s Pnvaf7149 M9e rates in design, P onstructlon, o Constructilon Phase.:`Oleet c nor a en o Oct P • y, `i. Wilson, t..-Sheehan & Assoc. 143 S. Brea Glvd., Brea, CA 82621 . 1714) 99001:3 EXHIBIT •A• AYATHYST AVENUE - 19TH STREET ITEMIZED PRICING SCHEDULE Harold A. Wilson WILSON- SHEEHPN 6 PSSOC. ' HR :dp F P r 1' Civil Engineering — peslgn — Environmental Surveys M`' I 'M1 `. x gf. �� +515'r;3 _ `i• ,�.L`�`5..' t_. s.'i.': i:etrd4r'y f"' h `T? 1 Survey S 1.6;0.00 2) Utility Research and Coordination 340.00 33 Pavement Evaluation and Soils Report 1.650.00 4 Construction Plans (w /striping Alt. I1) 7.660.00 { Striping Alt. /2 plus $483.00 t. S Legal Descriptions 590.00 6 Prepare and Maintain Files 290.00 a, 7 Quantity and Cost Estimate 275.00 8 Prepare Contract Specifications 9 Attend Coordination +610.00 Meetings, Design Review 420.00 p 10 Pre- Construction Conference and Constructior Coordination 420.00 Total with Striping Alt. fl $13,925.00 y° (4 -d -I) Total with Striping Alt. 12 $14,408.00 r (4 -d -II) - Enclosed is our current fee schedule. Payments to be made monthly as work progresses. " M13IT •B- '+ Design Schedule: Two months (calendar) will be required to complete the T preliminary design. Survey and soils investigation work will delay some portions of tho design work. Harold A. Wilson WILSON- SHEEHPN 6 PSSOC. ' HR :dp F P r 1' Civil Engineering — peslgn — Environmental Surveys M`' I 'M1 `. x gf. �� +515'r;3 _ `i• ,�.L`�`5..' t_. s.'i.': i:etrd4r'y f"' h `T? Wllsofl L, - Sheehan &A (714) g90 -0123 ssoc. 143 S area BW era CA 92621 A EXii1= JANUARY 1986 FEE SCHEDULE Junior Draftsman HOURLY I Draftsman Dest $ 24.25 goer, Senior Draftsman 31.50 P'0'5slonal (Design, Field Superv151on,R�w 42'00 Registered Civil Engineer Activity) 4 Consultation , °r Land Surveyor 8.50 Principal or prof 52.50 52'50 Engineer knowledce of consultiner 67.00 Clerical Lftigatfan - Portal to Portal g Clerical 2 -Han 110.00 Surrey party 3-van Survey party 23.25 Each 115.00 Each A Electron tional .Man Beyond a 3 -Han Survey 0 136.00 c Survey Equipment arty, Data 24.00 Collection and Print -out 48.00 Construction Observation Outside 63.00 tout *acts, materials, and at cost plus :5: 42.00 Cur firm other services billed Sacary urves :a'so work on a retainer basis (from the biueprints Z•0 to 3.0 plus direct non - Cost P'. us , d;aftin PPi'es Fixed ium f'xod PaYeent, or' °tc:• salary ccsts (i.e.. ti P suro payment. a[ —DaZ E+M Sury ronniental en - 5 P� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire. "ity Engineer BY: Blane M. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreecent with G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers for the Preparation of Engineering Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the Drainage Area VII Store Drain for a fee of $55,320.00 and to establish a 10% project contingency fund to be paid for from Systems Development Fees with reimbursement to follow from the Redevelopment Agency RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of this report that the Professional Services Agreement for the Preparation of Engineering Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the Drainage Area VII Store Drain be awarded to G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers for a fee of $55,320.00 to be flmded by Systems Development Fees with reimbursement to follow from the Redevelopment Agency's 203 set aside funds for low i moderate income areas. In addition, it is recommended to establish a 10% project contingency fund (55,537 .)0) for the use in extra work or change order to be administered by staff. 11AO(Gf MW /ANALYSIS The Drainage Area VII Store Drain or lower Turner Storm Drain, as it is sometimes called, provides drainage coverage for the Mort.'iTown Park facility, Cucamonga Middle School and the Drainage Area south of Foothill to 8th Street between Archibald and Turner Avenues. Three engineering firms were invited to ropose, including G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers, Derbish, Guerra i Associates, and Madole 8 Associates. The fee proposals amounted to: G.P.S. $55,320.00 Madole A Assoc. $90,572,00 Derbisn, Guerra 8 Assoc. $71,000.00+ (Verbal) The fire of G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers has just completed the preliminary report for the sane drainage system and has distinguished themselves in completing plans for numerous other storm drain projects throughout the Orange, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino County area. R Attachments 77 a t y, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEIEIIT e. This Agreement is made and entered into this, of between the City of Rancho Cucaimenga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and G.P. consulting civil Engineers of Tustin, California (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT-), 2. Recitals. ti) CITY has heretofore Issued its Rai for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional sorvices with respect to the preparation of Enginearine Plans Specifications and Enefnmer s r g stimaiw for the Cons -of the Oraina Area VII Storm Drain (•Pro ect' hereafter). (ii) CONSULTANT has new 5,,Wtted its proposal for the performance of such services. (t1i) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Come"ston, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. follows: NON' THMFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT at 1. Definitions.- The folla►dng definitions shall apply to, thw following terms, except when the context of this Agreement otheMsie requires: 1T _ /ff _t�,.•Y,�;'FF ,•I (a) Pro ect: The preparation of 1) es19n and Richt -Of Ya -of -Nw Enaineerina. s �i. ._.. - --• . - RIsearch and Coordination for the Area YII Storm Drat n described in Exhibit 'A' Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports attendance aiwf dociaerts to CITY as required and at WW all work sessions, Public hearings and other meetings c Services. onductea by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of (b) Services: be Performed Such professional services as art necessary to by CONSULTANT in order to c lere o� the project. (c) C tenon of Pro ect: The date of completion of all Phases the project, including any and all procedures, development Plans, maps, surveys. Plan documents, technical reports, eeetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSU"ANT at Public hearings regarding the p.ojeCL attached he acceptance for by is set forth in Exhibit •a' Project Schedulhereto. 2. CONSULTANT a rees as follows- (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the Project In accordance with Exhibit 'A' and applicable with Federal. State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the re: -• 6 satisfaction of CITY. n v r ' r�}i•drii - "2- (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surreys, reports, Plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "docents*) including all suPPlemantal technical documents, as described in Exhibit W to CITY within the Vol specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit `8'. Copies of the docents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit 'A.. CITY soy thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said docents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said docents as are dosed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities doterminad mcessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT,s sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as easy, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the term$ of this Agreement. in the event any such other Persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shsil be fully qualified to perforn services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written Approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To Pay CONSULTANT a maxiMae sus of _-51320.00 for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover theme cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors,, to' CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'A'. d, j' .3. s (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges sha'.l be detailed in Exhibit V either with respect to hourly rates or lump saw amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Exhibits W. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any saw in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as Y set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C'. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable Mae after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Inforsation and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other Information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to' complete the project. r (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges sha'.l be detailed in Exhibit V either with respect to hourly rates or lump saw amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Exhibits W. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any saw in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as Y set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C'. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable Mae after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Inforsation and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other Information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to' complete the project. I (c) Such information as is generally aviflable from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining Information from other governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, ft shall be CONSULTANT'S responsibility to mike all initial con gathering of such information. tact with respect tt to the S• �ershf of Oa<u•ents: surveys, drawings, y t All documents, data, studies, D , a+odels, Photographs and sports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to Ufa Agreaynt shall be considered the property of CITY and' upon 'Yynt for servfces Perforny by CONSULTANT, such documents and Other Identified materials shall be delivered to CITY DY CONSULTANT. COHSOLTANi mime, howorer, make and retain such copies of said documents and Materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or Any alteration or revision of tha plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY• agrees to hold harmless and indemnify re vision, or use or the CONSULTANT against all mayasy The CtTY claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteratio au u revision, agents• reuse at another site by the CITY , n Its staff or 6• Termination. �• This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon;, the giving of a written 'Notice of reminatloe• to CONSULTANT. at least ftfta�n (1ST days prior to tlm date of � event termination specified in said Notice.! In this Agreement is Sa tarninatW, C , ONSULTANT a tile; Mil be comDenSattd ai •� _S_ .. CON"ITANr's applicable hourly rates as set f ra4 basis with respect to the Parcenta _ date of forth i° Exhibit •g•� � tanain+tion, In no event, ge °f the Protect completed a pro - o"* sDeelfted to however, shall C as Of the CITY any and all Paragraph at, above. CONSUL receive more then Oh 3 CONSUIY,� she Provide to CONSULTANT is of reports, �whether In draft drarfngs, NPs models 9ra hs °f date of or final ' AgrHmmt a termination. f °r*. except for Prepared by cause. C�u'T'� �lY not terminate 7• Notices this notices and Oesf demands . invoices arq written eted Re rasantatfres: hereto shell be addressed CONUnieations i>, MY eed all Individuals fu as set forth in this paragraph twe++l parties PerforsanCe�re' shall be those persons I. the below named Civil En i P+rtfea PrlmaHly reSPO°sfble for near for under this Agremment: thane N, thm the CITY and No Frands for CONSUL Norman K. S fe1Nn Exeeutiva Yfee Senior Any colernlcations, such notices, President b1 Nil, shall De demands, invoices addressee fo deemed and nn'itten r'tY - eight f1d1 hours t0 have been Nfl a /ter de received 6Y the . Postage PrePafd and Posit thereof in the Unfted states d• 7nsurancearoPer1Y addressed as set forth this Altreament CONSULT, shall net above. Company C until facie s Obtained all insurance der under coe"Ce won# der subcontractor, to Ptable to CITY Wired hereunder to C°aaMnco work nor shall i° a Of the subcontractor has a suLeontraet CONSULTAfiT allow IV maintain at ell tfmst Men obtained. COMSULi l all LnsuranCe required of insurance: during the team o/ AXT shall take this Agreement out and `c L1N follovin9 Policies e „ -7- (a) NOrker's Comcensaton Insurance: Before beginnfng work. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certlfiate of insurance as proof that it Ms taken out full workers' coWnsaton insurance for all persons who it mAy employ directly or through subcontractors to carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws the o,' State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the Paymen of compensation to his eployees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shell sign and file with CITY a certification as follows; `I • aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' capensstlon or to undertake self insu'raxe in accordance with the provisions Of that Code, and I will comply with such Provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement. (b) Publte Liability and Property OaeeZ: Throughout tir. term of this Agreement, At CONSULTANT'S $ole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, In full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, brad form, general public liability and Automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for ' personal injury, death, it Property damage arlsing from CONSULTANT'S activities, providing protection of At least One Million Dollars (f1,000,000,00) for bodily Injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (s1,o00,000,00) for property damage, (c) Errors a_ nd_ omissions: CONSULTANT shell ,take out and maintain At all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or t policies ;� „ -7- Of insurance concerning errors and omissions ( "ealpractfce ") Providing Protection of at last S250 ,000,pG_ for errors and omissions (`malpractice') MN respect to loss arising from actions of CGNSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder In behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Ae iroments: All insurance requfred by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies raqufred under Paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, Officers. agents. All policies shall contain language, employees, and to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer wives the right of subrogation against CITY a CITY" elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) nd the policies CITY; and (3) primary and noncontributing MN any insurance that MAY be carried by they cannot be Cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (3G) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified am11. C shall furnish CITY with copies of all such GNSULTANi Nee, or certificate evfdencfn policies Promptly upon receipt of 6 ' 9 the insurance' CGNSULTANT way effect for its own account insurance not rsqufred under Nis Agreement. 9. Indemnification. CGNSIA T save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed ANT shall defend, indemnify and officials, officers, agents employees, from all liability from loss, and damage or injury to Arsons or Property, including the payment by CGuSULTANi of aged and all legal costs and attarnoys' fees, in any apnner arising out of any neg1ISant or intentfo, or a willful acts or orris ;ions of the Co11SULTANT f Agreement t n the performance of•' including. but not limited to, all cons this amximue atMt permitted by law. equertlal damages. to the '�, i I St ` tw .s ,< zz M. 10. Assigment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whcle or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officars and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose t:- be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's' Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party to said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs tram the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entfre Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, boitmw the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Ecch party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not emWdied herein nor any other N agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only d if it 1s in writing signed by all parties. r 1 019341-T LV r a �.. • a a, •, b as of "a end yarfirst s tl, Wrties he ht lda c�tTlix cly, � ,t forth above �e eaecnty th /s Agreement EX4181i •�• 17821 � C, '"t o L Suit, 93 consultin (714) 832 -4 ,107 8 Civil engineers January 91 1987 Mr. Sane S nior Civil Pr4ndsen City of Ranchongineat Coxuunity Devpucamonga 9320 Baseline Aod nt Dspattment Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ralerencej Proposal for Professional Services Ys ems iRate ! plans Pecificatioas S • Al2gn■nttB Storm ha Connection [olignant Drain Channel, Drainage Area Deet Stud Door Blanes VIZ. Crotty G.P.S. proposes to the storm drain sYsGei ids plans, , Conn system Daeranted Peciall tion+ and estimate for nclud caBl2'itihn°ludinn is far Aligns nt 19n prainageYA., includes the 9 laterals Storm necessary storm B- B ' °s show s VZI.• Rancho uca south end drain 1 and B-2 Thia n Bxhiblt Cucamo of the Trailer m upstream Proposal nga' waterthed Ate, VII. Park end of Al! G.P. , as shown on C2tmeot 'Drain will review VII "eaeexisting Na °ter Plan h drainage problem necessat hydrology correctivs °t Devon Street and We 9Y and measures. will stud moody Eaaement Romona Avenue and the local dsscrlpt2ons and ma recommend for negotiatl M school d2 snaps WillTDe prepared for we he City will execution b will coordinate be responsible cons t_ueheothe Deer Crq X211 Procedures is Y for assume Permit entry into Corp P o! engineers Channel, There n°cessar special dasig a� channel. This ptopo,�i accept , not maletyp° of includd• any d Mr. D1ane,N.''lrandiin t = City of Rancho Cucamonga S PLOpesal - Deer Creek Alignment D January 9, 1987 Page 2 Y U i 1 Our fee does not include printing of contract documents for bidding purposes. We will provide plans %nd coordination with the utility companies. Our fee for the above professional service, including design survey and soil report, is $55,320.00 (included is the $2,100 credit for previous research as stated in the study proposal). Should the City select an alignment, other than 'D', we reserve - should right to negotiate a revised fee. Should you have any questions please call me. Since,.ely, r K. Spielma Liecutivf vice Pre NRStlkb �; •.�'L'. °� w °�... Y•tll,•YY�_. � r' q. _ to `� ' •ra •- ' -Yfi 1 i ° ��yLsYq consulting cdvil engineers January 19, 1987 Mr. Slane Frandsen Senior Civil rng near i City of Rancho Cuc Coamunity Develo�nga 9320 Beeline RoP ps,a D+Partment Rancho CU no CA 91730 17821 Z 17th. Strew Salle 293 Tel°. Cillfo -alt 926" (714) 832 -4707 Referancer Addundum to Propor,el for Deer Creak C6 Connection, Drainage Araa VIZ, dated 1 /9%h , Dear Blansr we e review The area will have tort' naQe area and study, Me are a rodifiad for check street flov at 1 Includes the r a are of on of ht two errors in the Psttorns Is approved , b rOdlflcations. Prellrinary Y the City. hydrology based on Oar P'rOPOSal We had anticlpated the vh +teller sethod serve the undeveloped areaeasitY oP Peron Boulevard. Pad a vest of Turner Avenue story drain to Inc, Our Pr*POSal does - and south of ude Plans for Should you have any questions, this s:cension. ` SSncorely, pleas call me, e No men 1r• SPislwn Executive Vice Presiden NXStlkb I NtcvvEO JAN 22 1%7 nn ro 11000) auw»u . t1LNMK lu°LCe EXHIBIT '8' PROJECT SOEDULE 1. Agreements to council ............................... .....February 4, 1987 2. Rotico to Pnxeed............ ....February 5, 1987 ........ ............... 3. Right -of -May Drawings ......................... . ........March 15, 1987 4. 1st Plan Submittal .. ............................... ......April 15, 1987 5. Plans Ready for Pipe Order........... ............ .April 30, 1987 6. Plans, Specifications, A Estimate CoWletlon ..............June 15, 1997 5;Yf + rEa 7s :..r.,v map F t e, k i Y�. 5 ?• t. t t, S i� ,t 1 (• EXHIBIT "C• SCHEDULE OF NOUALY RATES Principal Prof. Enginaer /Licensed Surveyor /Landscape Architect f 76 /hr. Senior Designer /Senior Technician SR /hr. Designer; Technician 4g /hr. Draftsman 13 43 /hr. 1 Man Survey Crew 38 /hr. 2 Man Survey Crew /hr. 3 han Survey Crew 10! /hr. 4 Man Survey Crew 141 /hr. Clerical 173/hr. 22 /hr. t. 4i r, 1 t. RESOLUTION N0, 7 7 - Oy 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CIF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO 'AWARD AND OTHERWISE EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL FFO VtT PAEP� CtlOF ENGINEERING PLANS,CSPECIFICATTIIOONSS AND ESTIMATES FOR THE DRAINAGE AREA VII STORM DRAIN FOR A FEE OF SSS,320.00 TO BE PAID FROM SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEES AND TO ESTABLISH A 109 PROJECT CONTINGENCY Fumo IN ADDITION THERETO Jpp'a&'REAS, the City Council of the City of Rat7che Cucamonga desires to construpctioneOf the Master Plans Storm Draintserving Estimates Area VII the y Rancho Cucamonga, an area bounded by Foothill Boulevard at the north, 8th oast; and Street at the south, Archibald Avenue to the west and Turner Avenue to the y letter inrere WHEREAS. tosa Consulting ttnforiproposalsafrom b� City, ihasasubmittted evidence of qualification and 1s willing to perform such services for a fee. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to accept, award and otherwise execute a Protesslcnal Services Agreement with G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers for the Preparation Of Engineering Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the Drainage Area VII Storm Drain for a fee of $55,320.00 to be paid from Systems Development Fees with a reimbursement to follow from the Redevelopment Agency. IN ADDITION, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish a contingency fund of 109 of the amount of said agreement or $5,532.00 to be used in the event of extra work or change order, to be administered by staff. r .Y Y� .m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 22, 1987 TO: City Council FROM: Mary Kuhn, Personnel Technician SLJBJECT: Destruction of City Documents RECOMMENDATIOM It Is recommended that City Council approve the resolution granting authorization to destroy personnel applications and files which ore two years or more old listed In Exhibit A. Attached for City Councils consideration and approval is a resolution which authorizes destruction of certain City records. MKuls Attachment n+- � me RECORDS Ili�pE'C IOYS FOR "Inn IYL�T dmin. ORY WOSfs�r DPPAR , �= 'stration COCAIiOY Pera`n`fflci FZLE CAS. R0, FACE 80. 1 of 3 Sl[EV CASE RO_~ DRAitPI R0. "Aln IYADATrmary Ruh � SRPLy B0. n/1 -21_e7 L'kLDSI4P DATES 1978 -11 983 9d�M (CO.I=, SERIFS rinr(S) i DPSCRZPIICY p Mlscellor Files F c 1980 81 Budget Flle 507,02 Pe , r Tralning S 05 19 502.05Salorrt e,in.(res, r a11980 Recr�t� f� Account Clerk nifont si ative Aide A Inlstrotive 1 19w Assistant Ptivil E^gInter 198p 1983 As Aswciato Plly tneer 19799 880, 81, 82 Building Irofor 9ulldtng Te 1979, 80,81 83 hnlol 8ustnps Lia Inspfor 1981 1978 City PI 1981 Clerk 7tp str 1981 Nineering T Technician 1979, 80, 82, 83 1983 FO'DESYROCY -Bpft YBpH Y Wrzmrs IOLURttr Junior Plmner Lifeg,grd MointenorKe Worker Park Plan PMOIa fence SWervlsor Polic a Cl. or Pur IhwtWlorw rh Clerk for ng Clerk Recreation Assist Recreation L ant eader Secretary Traffic Analyst DISFOSIIZOR p RPC8 1979 1982 1980, 81, 82, 83 1979 1983 1 1980, 82 1981 1981 1381 IPSO, 83 1979 � I INSTuCTIONS FOR RECORDS INVENTORY WOIUCSR DEPARI}�,K Administration COCATI09 Personnel Ofrice FILL' CAJ' N0. PACE N0. 3 MIX CASE N0. or 3 PREPARED IrInATEN.r OrHIR Y NU 1 INC T (CO.PT. LWSIVr DATES 198= 1 SERIES rIrLE(S) 6 DESCIrmcaf OP COF1!M A Ilcytlons - Administrativea Amounting ssistant 1984 Animal Asaaelate Clr lnaK tv�+er Aueelate 1414 85 P 1 84 Crossing rd 1984 ��P�n9Atidde 1983 1980 F 9hter .84 oim 85 . 85 APPROVED FOR DESOZY C TY ATIOR. 0 101ARRit MIScellon.Wa Worker Mkt Pork Plow. SWIG NrdiaW^'1cea Director rg RQcreatlon As latent Recraatlon lead., S.cn(ary DISPOSITION Or RECOR tD5tD5 DRAWER NO. -- SNEIp N0.- X84 �� , 84 1984 9 , 82, 83 81 1982.84 9 ■ INSTRUcrioN5 FOR RECOROS INVE.YIORY YORRSHEEr DEPARTMENT Administration —�� FILE CAB. N0. . LOCATION Personnel Office —�'� SHELF CASE N0. PACE N0. 2 of 3 ��- OMM PREPARED BY/DATEMary Kuhn /1 -21 -87 VOUM —~� INCLUSIVE DATES 198 Jan. SERIES Tl=(S) i DERarnIOB OF CORrEHTS Personnel A Ilcotians Oral Boards June 1983 RKreatian Assistant, Recreation Leader Ofeguard) June 1980 Secsonal Maintenance Aide August 1980 Accent Clerk Coordinator P anl Building Sr. Civil Engineterr Cwhier/Information Clerk Sr. Pabllc Works Inspector Clerk Typist Sept 1980 Grading Specialist Oct 1380 Assistant Plan Plankg Aldo Engineering Aide Plan Check Coordinator Public Works Inspector FOR DESTRt;M(y .4 BY �t =� 97 ROM"t DRAUU So SHELF NO. Nov i9B4 AerOClate Civil Engineer Sr. Maintenance Worker Street Aide Plan Checw r Operator k Sr. Redewloprnent Analyst Police Clerk Dec 1980 Assaelate Civil Engineer Aswciata Planner Maintenance Worker Jan 1985 Engineering Aide Feb 1985 Assistant Civil Engineer Assistant Park Planer En9lneerin9 Technician DISPOSITION OF RECORDS: .�ree s l almon No. f 7 •Dy $ A 113MVF101 Of III ClTI COUNCIL OF THE CITY or RANCID CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADYBOR1ZING 721 DEITRUCTIOM Of CITY RECORDS AND DMKINTN W;riCR All NO LONGER IEQUIl® AS PROPIDRD UK= COP MENT CODE SECTION 34090 WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records under the charge of the following City Department are no longer required for public or private purposeu PUSORMC. WME", it has been determined that destruction of the above -meutioned materials it neceuar/ to conserve storage apace, an reduce staff time, expense, and confusion in handling, and informing the public; and WHEREAS. Section 34090 of the Coreraant Code of the State of California authorizes the head of a City department to destroy any City records and documents vbich are over tvo years old under his or bar charge, vitbout makleg a copy thereof, after the sue are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, in storage, without making a copy thereof, vhicb are aier tvo years old; and W@EAS, said records have been approved for destructive by the City Attorney. Mow, TIERRORE, Tu CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY Or RARCHO CUCAMONGA DOM RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION la That approval and authorization Is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached bereto and made a part bareof. SECTION Z: That the City Clerk to authorized to allow examination by and donation to the repartment of Special Collection, of the University Research Library, University of California, or other historical society designated by the City Council, any of tbe.records described in Enbibit "A" attached hereto and side a part hereof, except those donned to be confidential. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the esme'sholl be in full force and effect. ' PASSED, APPROSID, and ADOPTID this 4th day of February, 1957. - EIRIBIT "Ae She following records are belay requested for destructions HL,cellaneoes files ��. 1910 -31 Budget File r 507.02 Personnel, Training 1912:- , r r 562.05 Salary /leaefits Proposals 1900 502.05 salary Benefit survey 1901 , ,; Cam. 9� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager �y FROM: Mark R. Lorimer, Adoinistrative dnalyatf "K SORJECT: LECISLATIVS DATA BADS ANCO KINUTIDR Will It is recommended that the City Council approve subscription to LeSitetb allowing for legislative data bare and authorise funds in the mount of 97,500 for a calendar year subscription. After the City Council approved subscription to the Computer Information System legislative data bass, Citylink, staff Vas approached by a competitive legislative data base service, Legitech. After looking more closely at both Legitecb and Citylink, staff recoessends that the City pursue a legislative data base subscription with Legitecb rather than thmugb Citylink. While both services provide legislative bill tracking services at the state level, Legitech will provide the City legislative information for all federal bills as well. Legitecb appears to offer more services and is more user- friendly than is Citylick. Should the City choose Legitech over Citylink, it would sacrifice the opportunity to receive the League's Legislative Bulletin on Friday rather than the following Moaday or Tuesday. The City would also not participate is Citylink's MALI. service, wlicb in concept, allows ccmuunicatiou directly with other cities and the League. Staff has contacted other cities who subscribe to Cit7limt and has learned that none of those cities take advantage of the LMAU services. It appears na if not enough cities subscribe to Citylink at the present time in order to asks a direct city -to -city network a beneficial tool. As gore -and -more cities subscribe to Citylink in the future, the :. earn ice might be a more beneficial legislative data base than Legitech is at the present time. The City is not obligated to Legitech for any specific period of time oad could cancel that service and begin subscribing to Citylink in the event the Citylink earn ice beaemem a sore useful tool. D� IH e a League of Califomia CitieJ 140OKSTREET • SACRAMEwTO.CAM14 • (916)"45790 c°,,.,",aTogc,°,"„ Sacramento, California January 12, 1987 TO Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks in Non - Manager Cities FROM: Jane Baker, Deputy Mayor, San Mateo and president, League of California Cities SUBJECT: League of California Cities' Financial Condition and Proposed Dues increase The League of California Cities' Board of Directors by unanimous vote is proposing a 6% increase in dues which would increase revenues to the League in 1987 by approximately $87,600 or 3.3%. Some examples The proposal would mean a $1 increase for cities of 1 -500 people, an increase of $307 for cities of 50,001 to 60,000 people, and an Increase of $590 for cities of 150,001 to 500,000 people The action of the Board of Directors needs to be confirmed by the League's 13 regional divisions by March 13, 1087. Ratification by a majority of division representing a majority of cities is required. As specified by the League's by -laws, regional divisions not responding within 60 calendar days shall be considered to have ratified the dues Increase. The following memo provides a summary of the League's financial condition, its proposed dues schedule and the line item budget for calendar year 1987 Back round: The League of Csltfernia Cities Is a voluntary association of c t es. am pleased to report that the League continues to have 100% membership and that in 1986 dues represented approximately 55% of the total revenue while 34% was from conferences and institutes, 5 5% from the Annual Exposition and 5 5% from investment income. In the past, it has been the policy of the League to have large periodic dues increases, usually 50% to offset inflation and costs of needed service programs. In 1983 when the membership agreed to a major dues increase, it was the etrong recommendation of city officials that the Leagne make every effort to avoid large periodic dues increases In the future The 1983 amendment to the League Constitution and Bylaws addressed that concern by authorizing the Beards of Directors, by a two - third's vote, to increase dues up to 10% annually. The amendment went on to provide for ratification of any dues increase by the regional divisions within 60 calendar days from the date of submittal by the Board of Directors. The amendment also specified the above noted procedure.1 for ratification. /0V All � : • \. ,\ \ ƒ �. � \� < � . k R mammon No. 97.0 ;$ A RZSMUTION Or TAE CITY COUNCIL Or TEE CITr Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIrORRIA, AUTEORIZIRO TEE M212UCTIOU OP CITY RECORD/ AND DOCOMITS WEICE All 110 LONCEE RIQUIRID AS PROPIDED UNDER COFEMKINT CODE SECTION 34090 WMEAE, it ban been determined teat certcin City records under the charge of the following City Department are no longer required for puldie or private purposee: PLXSC"X WHEREAS, it has been determined that destruction of the &hot e- mentioned materials in necessary to conserve storage space, amt reduce staff time, expense, and conf..siou in handling, and informing the public; and WHEREAS. Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California authorises the head of a City department to destroy any City records and documents which are over two years old under him or her charge, without makice a copy thereof, after the same are no longer required, open the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WREREAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as listed In Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, in storage, without making a copy thereof, which are over two years old; and WHEREAS, amid records here been approved for destruction by the City Attorney. SOU. THEREFORE, TEE CITr COUNCIL Or THE CITT Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA DONE RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That approval and authoritntion is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. DICTION 2: That the City Clerk is authorized to allow examination by and donation to the Department of Special Collections of the University Research Library, University of California, or other historical society designated by the City Ceuncii, any of the records describod in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, ezcept those deemed to be confidential. SECTION 3t That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the sue shall be in full force and effect. PAESfD, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of rabmiry, 1967. ■ 1 t,. EMISIT vAa The following records are being requested for destructions Mlscellauroes Piles 1980 -81 Budget Pile 507.02 Personnel Training 1982 502.05 Salary /Benefits Proposals 198) 502.05 Salary Benefit Survey 1951 Recruirmot sae Account Clerk 1980 Accountant 1980 Administrative Aide 1980 Administrative Analyst 1987 Assistant Civil Engineor 1980 Assistant Planner 1979, 80, 81, 32 Associate Civil Engineer 1979, 80, 83 Associate Planner 1979, 80, 81, 83 building Inspector 1981 Building Ternuiciun 1978 Business Lie Inspector 1981 City Planner 1981 Cler6 Typist 1979, 80, 82, 83 Lngiueerina Technician 1983 Junior Planner 1979 Lifeguard 19e2 Maintenance Worker 1980, 81, 82, 83 Park Maiatence Supervisor 1979 Park Planner IBM Plan Cbecker 1979 Police Clerk 1980 Public Works Inspector 1980, 82 Purchasing Clerk 1981 Recreation Assistant 1981 Recreation Leader 1981 secretary 1980, 83 Traffic Analyst 1919 • ".x..."°rs�i�,A�`i;•.�12c"r'_ star ��'rs`ti +,:�ic .- -- ' �a 1 1110 - ° -° 's. Personnel_ Lol icati pea />teeaaee Administrative Assistant 1984 Accounting 1984, 83 Animal Control 1981 Associate Civil Engineer 1987, 84 Associate Planner 1984 Crsssing Guard 1987 Data Processing 1980, 84 Engineering Aide t984, 85 Firefighter 1984, 85 miscellaneous 1981. 84. 85 maintenance Yorker 1987, 84 management 1984 Park Planner 1983. Public Services Director 1987 putchsslas 1984 Recreation Assistant 1981, 82, 23 Recreation Leader 1981, 82, 83 Secretary 1982. 84 pogrsoueel Applications/Oral Boards June 1923 Recreation Assistance Recreation Leader (Lifeguard) Jane 1984 Seasonal maintenance Aide August 1984 Account Clerk Plan Check Coordinator Building Inspector, 8r. Civil Engineer Caabitr /Informatiou Clerk Sr. Public Works Inspector Clark Typist Sept 1984 Grading Specialist Oct 1984 Assistant Planner Planning Aide Engineering Aide Plan Check Coordinator Public Works Inspector " :v�`.i:*TA.i"q• :1.: +�v; ,ir�v"ak�k.,L: rl °. � _ ..r.g�j'.•� r`l' :s`C'e^ 1 Ea 1981 Associate Civil hgiaeer Sr. Ysist see see Worker Rogiaeeriag Aide Street sweeper Operator Plan Checker Sr. Redevelopment Analyst Police Clerk Dec 1984 Assotiavi Civil Rogiseer Associate Plaaaer Maistesance Worker Jan 1955 bngioeerisg Aide Feb 1985 Assistant Civil Register Assistant Park Plrnoer Engieeering Technician e - ����-� =�•x�� .��,���� log J a i t i ,4 F y„•. G Y vn nTrn AVnvr.. STAFF REPORT 1 a i i DATE: rebruary i. 1967 TO: City Council and City Manager � � TIOMt Mark g. Lorimer, Administrative ArAlystf^^"' SUBJECT: LgO18LATIVE DATA BIBS ,_ a •.r. It is recommended that the City Council approve subscription to Legitech allowing for legislative data base and autboriae funds in the amount of $3,500 for a calendar year subscription. After the City Council approved subscription to the Computer Information System legislative data base, Citylink, staff was approached by a coepetit'_ve legislative data base semi". Legitecb. After looking more closely at both Legitecb and Citylink, staff recommends that the City pursue a legislative data base subscription with Legitech ratbs than through Citylink. While both servitea provide legislative bill tracking services at the state level, Legitech will provide the City legislative information for all federal bills as well. Legitech appears to offer more services and is more aser- friendly than is Citylink. Should the City choose Legitech over Citylink, it would sacrifice the opportuuity to receive the League's Legislative Bulletin on Trider ratber than the following Monday or Tuesday. The City would also not participate in Cit7link's EMAIL service, which in concept, allows communication directly with other cities and the League. Staff has contacted other cities who subscribe to Citylink and has learned that none of those eities take adv¢tage of the MAIL sen ices. It appears as if not enwgb cities subscribe to Citylink at the present time in order to make a direct city -to-city network a beneficial tool. As more -aad -sure cities subscribe to Oit711nk in the future, that service might be u more beneficial legislative data base than Legitech is at the present rise. The City to not obligated to Legitecb for any specific period of tine end could cancel that service and begin subscribing to Citylink in the event the Citylink service becomes a more awful tool. Legislative Alta lies ' Page 2 Mroary 4, 176 She City already has appropriate computer - equipment, modem and acceuories necessary to or coos thi.Legi tack systm. Logitech vill install, the system and train a limited umber of our employees at a cost of approximately 81,000. She snewl sahecriptiom rate for the le .-ialativ service is 12;500. Vitb Lae City's coat and ceuera for legislative activlCine, Logitich could provid- as excellent telecemmaniations network pev -4ding the mex$s to address legislativ matters more efficiently gad effectively. - Should you here any questions or comments regarding Lejitech, please feel free to contact so at your convenience. luL /dja F 03 W •P r a 0 League of Califomia Cities 4 140OKSTRE -ET • SACRAMEM7.CA95ei4 • (9161444 5m _ N no +i°o Sacramento, California January 12, 1987 T0. Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks in iron- Manager Cities FROM: Jane Baker, Deputy Mayor, San Mateo and President, League of California Cities SUBJECT: League of California Cities' Financial Condition and Proposed Dues Increase The League of California Citte ;' Board of Directors by unanimous vote is proposing a 6% increase to dues which would increase revenues to th, League In 1987 by approximately $87,600 or 3.3%. Some examples: The proposal would mean a $1 increase for cities of ; -Soo people, an increase of $307 for cities of 50,001 to 60,000 people, and an increase of 55990 for cities of 150,001 to 500,000 people. The action of the Board of Directors needs to be confirmed by the Ls4?ue's )3 rentanal divisions by March 13, 1987. Ratification by a majority of drvislon revesentsng a majority of cities 1s required. As specified by the League's by Haws, x406990 dfaisloss not responding within 60 calend ;r days shall be zo attler L bare r>r.ifted the dues Increase The faaowrng a® yrovides a susaury of tse leaque's financial contrition, its :rrop=;ed cruet =%edulE and the line item budget for calendar year 1967. Back`, nd: Tara t"gue of W sfornia Cities is a voluntary association of fates. I ax IcACV1 to rwear't that the League continues to have 100% mes:tershlp atc0 that :tr Vqb dws reprasentsd aaproximately ;5% of the total revenue while 34% was fr= ceaferrncas, and institutes, 5.5% from the Annual Exposition and 5.5% frees investsent Imam. In the past, it has been the prialcv of the League to have large peri,.Jic dues increases, usually 50% to offset inflation and costs of needed service programs gg In 1983 when th• Tembership. agreed to a major Cues lntra4se, it was s to avoid large recommendation increases in the future.l4Tkae1983eamen,mentftot f the League Constitution and ByT,us addressed that conoer,i by authorizing the j4 Boards of Directors, by a two - third's vote, to Increase dues up to 10% ! annually- The amemdment went on to provide for ratification of :.ny dues Increase by the regional divisions within 60 calendar days from the date of scrIncreas by the Board of ratification. The amend_mnt also specified Cho above n ;ted procedure for eatifitatlon. rD =} . Z� z_ •'i I n Current Financial Condition: As cit +es gradually move into higher population categor es, eague revenuei Ku dues typically increase by approximately 2% per year. At the stem time Leigtie expanses to cover increased costs and an expanding service yrcgram are increasing on an average cf nearly ICX per year. Attached is the line item buaget for the League of California Citias, Including the ISC6 propdsad budget, estimated actual expenses for the calendar year and the proposed 1981 bt:dget. At the end of 1986 the Leag%" f financial condition is goad. Lower than expected expenses, along with greater at.sndan,v at League conferences and in,titutes, has permittad the League id re- est•blirh its prudent reserve and at the same time continue to move furward with a sound service program and a strong legislative advocacy "p_rogram. During the past two years the League also has been implementing a major data processing /office Automation effort that will perm'+ the Leaggue to enhance Its legislative, cembership and legal services to the membership. Proposal: The League Board ,f Directors, as authorized by the League's Constitution and Bylaws, is proposing a 6ii dues increase, which will result in approximately S87,600 in new revenue for calwar year 1987. This dues increase represents a modest 3.3% increase in general purpose revenue for the League. Wille total city rt:�erues are increasing at an average rate of over 12% per year according to the latest figures available !roe the State Controller, the League will continua to maintain its service program and build upon that very successful program whit' this small dues increasu. Action " Requested: You are urged to F• lately revsew the enclosed oaterlals. ou god u have Questions regarding the propostd,buCget, you are encouraged to contact members of the Board c! Directors or Executive Director Don 8enninghoven in the Sacramento office of the League. You also are encouraged to express your feelings regarding the dues increase to your respective League division dh107 pool J� ,F .11 •:7 .a: .',g H 4� LCAGOC Of CALtT0es1A CITICS STATSM[!T Of RW [BUt i [1 /tb DI TOA[! b tlmac.4 fropomsd 'sv9'U[ 1496 budget I... bed 1967 Buda., Da.. 1 1,621.166. 1.460,000 81.560,489. Con[ a test Asst. 711,150. 900.100. 932.GS0, lot .... t 115.000 145.000. 120.000, A ... at cant Cahlbtts 112,000. 143.000. 170,000. RISC t. Coat. -0. -0. .0. APprap Prior Year -0- .0. -0. TOTAL A[y[[IICS t 1.401.9 t. 1.649,100. 91,615,119. TSpewalTomes Par.... el 81.063.078 1.062,000. 511198.930. 6....... to Lafayette We Angeles Aetlr. /G.oup In. :.S.100. 232,000. 173.150 ter security 68,300. 66,250. 74,100. Astiru..t 114.000. 114.000. 120.000. Hospital $9.500. $1.500. $9.600. *&.ability 1.930. 1.400 3,100. Dental 12.950. 12,850. 15,950 z....I 4 C.psnse SOo.000. 100,000. 110,000. a.., .... to 87,730. Los A.9elee 12.250. *.at 30.000. 14,575. 16,130 Los a.q.lea 15,390. 11,275. M.sht.gton 4.410. 3.600. postage 34.900. 30,000. $1.000. Sacr.eaoto Los Angelo Tel.pbcea bap 34.000. 48.000. 56,000. Bar..... to ' Los Aeg41.m offt.. Supplies 4 Sep 31,100. $1,500. S8.300. 2 ....... to 51.730. toe Angeles 1.750. 99.1p• M.t.e A9rC...as 41.600 35,000. 33,0o0 Board Meetl.g Cap. t0.G00. 40.000. 301000. *... A Meab ... blys 67.610. $6.000. 60.030. A aLC 49.140 40.400 46,100. S. Otbtr 15.410 9,200. 13,200. I.ao 6 I ... r.... 19,010. 34 500. 15.100. A .... I Cos[ a test. 132.300. 130.000. 446.600. Legislative Advocacy 20.000. 31.100. 28.600 Llbr.ry 12,700. 12.700 14.000. spec &ol S.S.tr.. 45,!00 41,300. 82,000. A. 909, Divisions 4.000. 1,800. 7.000. b 6eaorrb a Infor4.0D0. 2,300 3.000 C COY. [.pease 25.000. 21,000 30.000 D other services 12,S00 11.100 20.000 cl..e sal Projects $0.300. 15.170• 32,000. A staff D... 1. 20.000. 4,000. 10.000 0. I.t.rm0/Consa1.19,000. 21,670. 20.000. C Salary survey 6.000. 4.350. 51000. 0 [e.qa Rid.,, 6.500. 4,300. 6,000 Annual Cont. [ehlblta 72.350. 12.200. 43.000. Ml.Callaneous a Cont. 26,456. 6.730. 10.000 Capital Improvements 48.000. 14,300. 71.401. A Autos 21.000. 21.000. 21.000. 8. ether 27,000. 11,300. 50,401 TOTAL [SP5iDITURZS S 1.402,914. / 2,399,64S. $2,743.653. / -1- t� 3 rl V a :UZ�wy s G 8• s a 3 G t' 3k 9 N V a 0 w b .o :, G• c v 0 a J N O N L fl 1/ N u e n N N N m N v C+ N Ci f/ Vr P n N C n m n m N e n n N 0 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Bylaws amendment adopted October 1983-by the Annual Conference General Assembly ARTICLE I% - DUES Section 1 Dues _ - The Annual dues for Member Cities, and the annual service charge f+•• Reggistered Cities of the League, on and after January 1, 1986, sha' is follnws: 1986 Increase Proposed 1987 For cities having a population of: 1 to 500 . . .. . . . $ 23 $ 1 S 24 ,. 501 to 600 . . . . . . . 59 4 63 601 to 700 . . . . . . . . 118 7 125 701 to 800 . . . . . . . 130 8 138 801 to 900 . . . . 154 9 163 901 to 1,000 . . . 189 11 200 • 1,001 to 1,250 . . . . . . 296 18 314 1,251 to 1,500 . . . . . . . . 361 22 389 1,501 to 1,750 . . . . . . . . 437 26 463 1,751 to 2,000 . . . . . 519 31 550 2,001 to 2,250 . . . . . . . . S55 33 588 ' 2,251 to 2,500 . . . .. . . . 614 37 651 2,501 to 2,750 . . . .. . . . 650 39 689 2,751 to 3,000 . . . . . . . . 708 42 750 3,001 to 4,000 . . . . 791 47 838 4,001 to 5,000 943 57 1,000 5,001 to 7 500 1,227 74 1,301 7,501 to 10,000 . . . . 1,416 85 1,501 10,001 to 15,000 . . . . . . . . 1,711 103 1,814 15,001 to 20,000 . . . . . . . 1,971 118 2,089 20,001 tc 25,000 . . . . . . 2,467 148 2,615 25,001 to 30,000 . . . . . . . 2,962 178 3,140 - 30,001 to 40,000 . . . . . . . 3,646 219 3,865 - 40,001 to 50.000 . . . . . . . . 4,436 266 4,702 50,001 to 60,000 . . . . . . . 5,109 307 5,416 60,001 to 70,000 . . . . . . . . 5,616 337 5,953 ° -- 3/0,001 to 80,000 . . . . . . 5,899 354 6,253 80,001 to 90,000 . . . . 6,289 377 6,666 • 90,001 to 100,000 6,890 413 7,303 100,031 to 125,000 . . . 7,858 471 8,329 tl• 125,001 to 150,000 . . . . . . . . 8,648 519 9,167 150,001 to 200,000 . . . . . . . . 9,828 590 10,418 i 200,001 to 500,000 . . . . . . . 491* 30* S23* ,t over 500,000 . . . . . 456* 27* 483• . 1A *per each 0,000 population ' !� In no event shall the annual dues or sei, ce charge for any city exceed a :wz total amount of 550,000. No city's dues shall increase rare than $5,000 per-, y year. yr For the purpose of this section, the population of each city shall be the, ,r,... population determined by the State Controller to making the most recent v allocation to cities pursuant to the Vehicle Licensa Fee Law. =: / ti i- 4 • h Section 2 Increase in Dues. As may be warranted the Board of Directors by a two - thirds' 2/3) vote may increase the dues schedule after notice and justification to the cities, as provided in Section 1 up to t°° -n percent (10X) annually. Section 3. Ratification by Regional Divisions. Any dues increase passed by the Board of Directors as provided for in Section 2 above shall be submitted to the regicnal divisions for ratification. Ratification by a majority of the regional divisions representing a majority of the member cities constitutes approval of the dues increase. Regional divisions must respond to the submittal of the dues increase within 60 calendar days from the date of submittal by the Board of Directors. Revional divisions not responding within 60 calendar days shall be considered as having ratified the dues increase dh107.pool 1. 1. • V .. . - . ri. A:d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ;,°+. k DATE: February 4, 1987 61 tb i� T0: City Council and City Manager Lvr, e- i, FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer 4 BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ` SUBJECT: Release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Parcel Map 8179, located on the northwest corner of Cottage and Acacia Street RELON@IDATIOI: Y, It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk shall cause a Release of Lien to record. L Background /Analysis _ On June 21, 1984, the City Council entered into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to guarantee the construction of the alley adjacent to Parcel Map 8179. The requirements of the agreement have been met by the acceptance on January 21, 1987, by City Council, of an Improvement Agreement and Security to qua; antee the construction of improvements required by Development Review 86-08. Respects submitted, z a 1: S v R .L . Attachments a �s � •z er 4^z3 .. ..1 ., RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND ? WHEN R- °CORDED NAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCANO M P. 0. BOX 807 j WIND CUCA NOiidi, t'ALIFOMIA 91730 i WFICE OF RELEASE OF LIFA Let r.otice be given that the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby release 9 its hen which it had caused to be recorded to the laid hereinafter more fully described, said lien having been placed thereon by the recording of a contract between the City of Rancho Curamonga and Edward L. Mayhew dated June 21, 1984, and recorded ,uly 11, 1984, as Document No. 84- 163631 Recorded in Official t Records, San Bernardino County, State of California. 3 ' Thc descript!on of the land is as follows: Parcel and 2 of Parcel Map 8179 as recorded in Cook 88 Pages 38/39 of Parcel Maps, records of San Bernardino County, Cali'ornia (AR1 209- 192 -13 thru 18) CITY OF RMCMO CO MGA, CALIFON TA, a aunicipal corporation BY: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor STATE OF CALIFORMIA 1 as s COUNTY OF SO 1E1WJtDINO ) on �9 before me, the undo— inner c i , Notary ublin' and for said F State, personally appeared Dennis L. Stout, i' personally known trxecedhe ininrumentas Mayor an behalf } of said municipal corporation, therein namedpor, avJ, acknowledged to ne that such munlcipal coration ; executed the odme. e- AIlAF55 my hand and official seu ^� Y+ Notary Public In and for said State all .F,� Y RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO + CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM EDWARD L. MAYHEM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 84 -176 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract anu Lien Agreement from Edward L. Mayhew ;and WHEREAS, said Rsal Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on July 11, 1984, as Document No. 84- 163632;and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk•ihall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County. Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. t { a a� ;-4! a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOPMDATION: The required %treat improvements for Tract 12772 -1 have been completed in on acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $8,100.00 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $61.,^0.00 Background /Analysis Tract 12772 -1 - located on the West side of Turner at Palo Alto. DEVELOPER: M Z S Residential Develoraent, Inc. 2950 Airway Avenue, Suice 8 -1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Respectfully ResDectfully submitted, Attachments I "?.y4 -.•, NNMAYCIFCOWANYOF WORTH AMEA" PHILADSLFMIA,PVNNBVLV /MIA - ENO. K0152231 -A ?4A MANCEPOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Tint" MORRIS d SEARLES tw4inaRer called dw PrinckW, and INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a PrnriNmia, Campaatlon, with primjpa offkaa at MBaddphla, hnnsyl W%k hnlnafoer a1Md tlu Stmty, rs An* bwrW onto CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOKk Inthefullandluaatmof EIGHT THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($8,100) Iawhtl money of the 1Nleed Star of Amwka6 to be pW to tM mW 09LIGEE ram whkh payment WWI wW hwy to be weds, w bind owaafyr, oWh9kr, eaeaYre, "W"1610110% maaeton NOW M V4 kdndy and aovrally, f4wty by theme pass to Sated with our sealswd dazed this 13th dnyof January 1987 WHERCAS, the above bounded Prktclpal cored Into a caeraa MW tM .19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDK -A dated March 7, 1985 for IMPROVPffNTS AT TRACT 012772 -1 HOW, THEREFORE, dte G rAldw of Mb obllpdm N euth that N *4 abaw bwrAW frhrlpY"nerdy wfdawt cat to the fald CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA any defects which may deedcp "na a Pried at ene YW W Row alto deal Of aeradetlan ads raptor of IM work paAomwd tmdr faW aasart lsrovlded arh dshatt ase eatsemd by eleMedr er kdrMr waferWt ar uorkwrsddp, then tltN obllpdon shut be voW; oll — It shall M sed ram6 M NU ietea sad enact. In WITNESS WHEREOF. tlto laid hkKW ads SaeIY Nov ehly eeaM OW dda baW under Pal tM dry ads yar fbat above wkwL Ranl NO S 8 SEARL / INSURANCECOWANYOPHORTMAMEyRI G — . BY_�tL .�td•rr�– r��.C. Harriet em, Ditran Assreer sr l�s - tom.` os , 'j z RESOLUTION NO. Q 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12772 -1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12772 -1 have been :ompleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed,- certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. sr e. rV .l 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF DEPORT Date: February 4, 1967 To: City council and city Manager From: Hill Holley, Community Servlcas Directo Subject: Approval to extend support; service agreement with United Computer Systems, Inc., for necessary computer upgrades and additions to the recreation management system. Recommendation: It is racmimended that the support service agreement be approved with United Computer for necessary upgrades of and additions to the computerized recreation management system in the amount of $14,160 to be funded through the Recreation Service Fund. Background: In this years Council approved program of services, it was approved to upgrade the existing computer system for handling client registration from a Lingle user system, which had been in place for five years, to one of multi -user capability. This has bean So% accomplished at this point. It remains only to finish the upgrade and additions to the software for the project to be fully implemented. Cpmment: This system of computerized registration has made our recreation progrem one of the most cost efficient services of St's kind anywhere, allowing as to effectively service more clients with fewer associated personnel costs than our counterparts. It is a good program which we are very proud of. If you have any questions or would like to stop by and see it, plasma feel free to give me u call. Thank you. BH: ks h +t x" z� a osl • , MMUTION NO. 87 -~ A RESOLUTION OF TEL CITY COUNCIL Or Tax CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A PUBLIC SAFETY COMaTTEx TO ACT 15 AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuc nooga, California, does hereby as follows: SECTION 1. Create a Public Safety Committee. Bole of Public Safety Committee SECTION T. The Rancho Cucamonga Public Safety Committee shall act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on community safety otters, such ant a. Study the Savarmental relationship between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Foothill Fire Protection District. b. Study the law enforcement needs vithia the e nity. c. Study the City of Rancho Cueamouga's disaster preparedness plan. d. Study of sueb other public safety issues as deemed appropriate by the City Council. Public Safety Committee Ktmbershin SECTION 3. The Public Safety Committee shall consist of a total of five (S) members. The mayor shall submit to the City Council the name of any person proposed for appointment to the Public Safety Committee sad upon such appointment by the City Council the name of the appointed umber shall be recorded in tae minutes of the City Council meeting. SECTION 4. The five ambers of the Public Safety Committee shall serve until such time as the purpose of the Public Safety Committee has been fulfilled. If a vacancy shall occur, it shall be filled in the above mentioned manner. f" ,Removal of N SECTION S. Members of the Public Safety Committee serve at the j pleasure of the City Council, cra may be removed at any regularly scheduled City Council meeting upon three (3) working days' prior written notice to the umber. Rmovers shall be by a majority vote of the entire City Council. Re¢u l•r Nret {naa SECTION 6. Rugular meetings of the Public Safety Committee shall be established by Resolution of the Public Safety Committee, open to the public ".h and adhered to all applicable open meetinS lame. /J? Page 2 Offiers r SECYIOM 7. She Public Stfety Cosaittee shall have a chairperson appointed by the Mayor to ;reside at all meetings of the Public Safety Cownittea, and a vice- ebairperson eeleeteJ by the Comittee to preside in the absence of the chairperson. If neceasary, a secretary to the Public Safety Comittee @ball be designated by the City Manager. SOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeougs hereby creates a Public Safety Coaittee to study and review public safety utters within the City of Rancho Cacwonga. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOP'T'ED this * day of *, 19*. AYES: HORS: ABBOT; Donnie L. Stoat, Mayor ATTESTS Beverly A. Autbelet, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. ADUSLIT, CITY CLINE of the City of Rancho CucaHOega, ,. California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed., approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lancho Cocawoega, K California, at a regular (special, adjourned) Heating of said City Council, hold on the * day of *, 19**. %I a : Raecuted this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucaeouga, California. E1• Beverly A. Autbelet, City Clerk ■ r or�i u t f DATE T0: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT February 4, 1981 Mayor and Members of City Council Lauren M. Wsssermans City Manager i It is recommended that City Council approve an Agreement with Cucamonga School District to share costs for a crossing guard at 9th and Baker during periods of school operations. gackarmmd In a letter dated January 22, 1981, the Cucamonga School District requested that a crossing guard be located at 9th and Baker. They base agreed to share the coat of the crossing guard with the City, which is consisted with agreements with other school districts within the City limits. Attached for the City Council's review is an Agreement letter which establishes the terms upon which the City will provide a crossing guard at the above - mentioned location. If you have any questiono or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully submitted, Y, ,a i Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager LMW /kep /J 'F wR ✓ C��S I r Jo.. i Cornuo. E0.U. aw....wn Cucamonga S.,hool District BOARD or Taurt{[s 8776 Archibald Avenue r NNM aRuovuw Rancho Cucamonga. California 91738 -4693 uxsoon s Telephone (714) 937.8942 owm oWQA WRAIK WuVU W January 22, 1987 NlLV1"CON Lauren Wasserman, City (Wager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 i Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -0807 Dear Mr. Wasserman: The Cucamonga School District requests a crossing guard for the corner of Baker and 9th Street and will be more than glad to share the cost of the crossing guard with the city. My understanding is that the district would have responsibility for half of the salary of the crossing guard. Please have your accounts payable department bill the district at our business address and we will forward a warrant for our share. On behalf of the Bcard of Trustees and the parents of Los Amigos School, please accept our thank you for providing this valuable service. Sincerely, 41,9 A j�f ?oh n F. Castello, Ed.D. erintendent 6 , CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONOA bw om. sst WT. R.". C.Wx,017".(714)er1•ItJI M -^ Tabruary 4, 1966 �x Dwh L Stet j r� tLM L e.G.w D Llbana K emea P=ku I w41% Board of Directors ld'rrSIAS Cucamonga School District c4 w,a,,,,,, 8776 Archibald Aven¢a ..�e.Lo Cu canon a, California 91730 ^ BE: i_g0,4pigC COLLD A2 92Z A11D BARBR Dear V rs: signatures •.4�. •ice =� `:.- _ Dated: I This letter is to constitute an agreement establishing the terse upon which the City of Rancho Cucamonga will provide a crossing guard at tLe above - referenced location daring periods of school operations. • The City will provide the guard as needed for periods of time determined by the San Bernardino Sheriff's Office (Rancho Cucamonga ^ substation). The City will pay the guard an hourly salary not to exceed $6.20 per hour. The guard will provide service "tit this • letter agreement is tarminated by either party upon 30 dap written antics. Zither party may do so at its sole discretica. Dpo¢ the conclusion of any school (fiscal) year, July 1 through June 30 during which this agreement is in effect, the City will t provide a statement to the District for one -balf tits payments made by the City to the crossing guard provided hereunder. That statement ! shall be payable by you to the City within 30 dap from the date of the statement. please date an', s:ya the copy of this letter provided to you, thereby entering into this letter agreement and return the copy to our City Clerk, Beverly Inthelet. ;t Very truly yours, i4 ' Dennis L. Stout '• Mayor MS /kep The above agreavent is approved and entered into by the Cucamonga School District. signatures •.4�. •ice =� `:.- _ Dated: I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT t; 8 • DATE: February 4, 1987 v ? M: City Council and City Manager tvn FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy !costa, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943 6 (Caryn) and 12944 to Landscape Maintenance District he. as Annexation No. 1 and setting the date of public hearing for Man .h 4, 1967 RECOMMENDATION s It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 1 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6. Analysis /Background Actachcd for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943, and 12944 to Landr oe Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn) for Annexation No. 1 and set" the public hearing date for March 4, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the t• Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. e: Respet u ubmitted, t ` i :dlw n Attachments b h+ L A. 7 l„ x - STS-' ' w. r.i�• �',Ts V .!. ■ 1 MARLBOROUGH DEVELOMWiT MWOitAZE C October 3, 1985 ^f; E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAUUHG.1 ENGINEERING D:YtSU!1 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9310 Baseline, Unit C P. O. Box 807 Ranchc Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attentiont Engineering Department. Res Street Light Maintenance District Gentlexens As the proposed developers of Tracts 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943, and 129{{, this is to authorize you to annex the above - captioned tracts into your Street Light Maintenance District and into the local Land- scape Maintenance District at such time as the tracts are recorded. Very truly yours, MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 8 Pea N. D rn • Piesident /sl /C)4l t i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn) ANNEXATIOI NO. 1 for Tracts 12936, 12930, 12939, 12943 and 12944 t SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No.6. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943 and 12944 as well as on •he lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shorn on the recorded Hap as roadway right - of-way or easements 'to ba granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specification4 The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the'subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagramp for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The-plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development Is hereby made a pare of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs ' No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by develonirs. Based on historical data, ' contract analysts and devaloped work standards, it is estimated, that maintenance costs for assessment purposes rmla equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. `E T! (including Annexation No. 1 comprised of 771,110 square feet of landscaped i " area) is shown below: ,• M Vt Rim-. t t Total Annual Maintenance Cost YTD f.30 x 771,110 square feet $231,330 Per Lot Annual Assessment '4231 3 f317.41 Per Lot Monthly Assessment 53141 (36.45 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagri . Is attached to this report and labeled •Exhibit A', by this reference the gram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION e. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is ;i��f''•S lY i.� a. :�5; .- �!+i.��xa' ...die aP �.YaJ i" 1 The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to,be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. i- 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and y determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. ,g Y4 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. .. 1 r S. Every in June, the City Council „ *✓ year conducts a public., hearing. , and w}; approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3 - *.! kfw, ;i��f''•S lY i.� a. :�5; .- �!+i.��xa' ...die aP �.YaJ i" 1 Properties and lapreiments to be included- within Annexation No. 1 to., Landscape Maintenance District No. 6: -T MAINTAINED AREA Tpa,OT R STREET TUKP uwoueu curtw Sa 12936 48 12938 56 Perimeter 12939 34 and Loop 70,000 300,000 12943 47 Streets 12944 58 �' 7D;L06 3�;40tf • t` -th ... I I I. I , .- I Y RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC*MGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELININARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, on February 4, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to age and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Llllhting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City. Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, Ala, report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report-and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report 1s sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City =—nc'1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses odd —work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in std ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, froo said work and of the incidental e)Wnse•, thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for—i epurposes of all subsequent proceediigs, and pursuant to the proposed district. tA. RN I - v -RESOLUTION NO. 0 7 �OS3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AH ASSESSMEiIT DISTRICT: DESIiNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PUP.SUINT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO HOW, THEREFORE HE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lightirg Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrl ttjM I convenience�re and TE is tM maintenance district in the City of operation of those parkways and greenbelt purposes by dead or ru boundaries of the proposed saints hereof. Said maintenance and opera any sprinkler system, trees, grX lighting, structures, and walls in e That the public interest and i of this City Council to form a Cucamonga for the maintenance and is thereon dedicated for common ubdivision tract nap within the Hstrict described in Section 2 ludes the cost and supervision of uttings, landscaping, ornamental n with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of York: The foregoing described work is to be located w n roadway r 9 -o -way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and "are particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled *Annexation No. 1 to Landscape Maintenan_e District No. 6•. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the dontempla e}`wol In the op n on of said y Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, tnd which district is described as follows: All that certain territe Cucamonga included with liras shown upon that car'' 1 to Landscape Maint heretofore approved by thi by Resolution No. *, in lines the extent of the the proposed assessment d file in the office of the t=__`A ., of the City of Rancho the exterior boundary 'Map of Annexation No- ice District No. 60 ty Council of said City sting by said boundary •ritory included within let and which map is on :y Clerk of said City. t SECTION 4. Resort bf Engineer: The City Council of said City by ' Resolution no. W has approved report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, ` assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 1, Landscape 1: Maintenance District No. 6' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. t ' SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at- a -same time and in same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on March 77-193r at' t r o 56 p.m. in the City Council_ Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all Persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said f district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of i Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the sax, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equailzed assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then sucn protest must cont'in or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsc in and L7 htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propo�Fall one an carr rou in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and + Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice + shall be maU pursuan to Section 51951 of vernxn Code. The Mayor t shall sign this Resolutioa and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 1D days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in TheDatl Re rt a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of-59.75 , a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 7 1 I DATE: TO: FRCM: BY: SUBJECT: RECOIBOIDRTION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT February 4, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide . ,t Approval to Annex Tract- Nos. 13027, 13057, 13058, 13059 and 13060 to Street Lighting Maintenance Otstrict No. (victoria) as Annexation No. 3 and setting the date of public hearing for March 4, 1967. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 3 and setting the date of public hearing regarding .the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Gaintenance District No. 3 . Analysts /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 13027. 13057, 13058, 13059, and 13060 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 3 and setting the public hearing date for March 4, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Respectfully submitted, AkSt_�_�_ Attachments i.; i WILL A,-vI LYON"�a Facfr 8540 ARCHISALD, SUItE B. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91770 • 1714) 980.2244 May 6, 1936 Lloyd Hubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape 6 Lighting Maintenance Districts 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Ranrho CuLamnga, California 91730 Subjecra Tract 13027 Dear Lloyd, T6LS is to request annexation to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance D cts far subject tract. Ford Manager SF /lmb /33 L t' REAL ESTATE OEVELOtM NT J. r /33 L t' REAL ESTATE OEVELOtM NT J. ✓�i WILLLh m LYOIN' col F) iriv 85AD ARCHIRAID. SUaf S. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 • (714) 980-224A July ti, 1986 Lloyd Hubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subjectt Tract 13057 Dear Lloyd, This letter is to request anneaatlon to the Landscape + d Lighting Maintenance Districts. R pa�e[ully, �� T . ave�rd Project Manager SP t lob 139 ` REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT e.'t; r'..it,'�itTb• 1 i':::.. c_i: ^.7:•. ,•1 t 2 ..tiy R N3.LU�bf LYONaiis� 8540 ARCHIBALD. SUITE 6, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 • 1714) 980-2244 July 22, 1986 Lloyd Hubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancno Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject, Tract 13058 Dear Lloyd, This letter is to request annexation to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts. Be e�` Q� c, �ff /u�1, l' y JcCavan Ford ` Project Manager STiImb _ /35, �r 3, 't x REAL ESTATE 69VELOPMFNT N _'m , t 3.1' may'. Ji�i�VILLTA,II LYON�ae�fax�r 8540 ARCHIBALD. SUITE B. RANCHO CUCA.W 4. CA 91730 • 17141 980.2244 July 2, 1986 Lloyd Rubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730 Subjecel Tr. 13059 Dear Lloyd, This is to request annasation to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts for subject tract. I Re ee tfully,� • en Pord� Project Manager SP,Imb /13Y REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT I r :Y a 9R, i i e Y.. # ./Ni WILLL+�bY LYON"a>4rrly 8.510 ARCHIBALD. SURE B. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91770 • 1714) 980 -22AA July 2, 1986 Lloyd Hubbs City of Rancho Cut &ao age 9720 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucanongs, California 91770 Subject, Tr. 17060 Dear Lloyd, This is to request anneaatlon to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts for subject tract. fle ac veful�,l/y,.l '� /y /y /� /,// en Po / ed Project Manager SP, Imb 137 Z t . - '� REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT a ° r CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria) Annexation No. 3 For Tracts 13027, 13057, 13058, 13059 and 13060 SECTION 1. Authartt !t TLis report is in compliance with to requirements of Article 4, Chapter I Division 15 Of Lighting Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Act of SECTION 2. Deneral Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit W Into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has alle lots dwithin tsaid Street tracts list well be maintained n the lots will directly abuttinguthe street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with t airspace ownership benefit e only, same ap ar lot- SECTION a dwelling unit shall be considered SECTION 3. ans and Specifications The plans sod specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans are as stipulated Of approval for hede development anlights asapprovedbyte City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of to street lighting the individual development is herebytmade a stramet lighting to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Dtailed Include: mthetrepair. activities or street all or lighting y district part of any Improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. T4 , r a ' SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. Ail improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (including Annexation No. 3 comprised of 2035 units and 6 9500E street lights, and 703 5000E lights, is shown below: y 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lps Lapp Size* YTT0 L 9500L 6 0 $10.16 5800L 504 199 $8.93 *Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Leaps Rate No's Total 6 X $10.16 X 12 $ 731.52 703 X $8.93 % 12 75 333.48 0,06i.du 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost $76,06500• $37.38 /year /unit —o.o n s n U151MUL $37.38 divided by 12 • $3.11 /mo. /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 •, Annexation No. 3 . These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future developeercc shall be annexed to the E Et w. District, r �.a ;. y.. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of N,eliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2, Pity Council adopts Resolution of Intention to, annex a District and sets yuolic hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public` hearing, considers all testimony and .r determines to fors a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Fay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. d • R w /6 ra1X. .... -. ✓i + ..iii- v�- ."`.ef; . _ _ ' t, `':i4'r..^:k °.EY_ih.'W �C•i'r EXHIBIT •A• Properties and improvements to be 'Included within Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 3: n PROJECT D/U sm TR 13027 157 50 TR 13057 147 35 TR 13058 203 43 TR 13059 137 46 TR 13060 86 I25 a b • .at,.ty�. �4 y'{{-" disi ?'4.`._1-.. • ; °�.. >�V��k:.; ".,,.'i9F ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING 'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO.3 p �, LffrATZ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRACT NO. 1302 �� NW OF UN BSRNARDINO r? O! CALIFORNIA - T - E' I!!! ITV n l�l J Y. t RESOLUTION No. 8 7 '�11 A RESOLUTION OF 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR MNEXATIONI NO.M3Y TOFSSTTRREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, on Febvar 4, 1987 the City Council of the City of Raxho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to sake and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and said City the writingg sre called for Pursuant � lto said Act,Cwhichlreport has been presented to this Council for consideration, and WHEREAS, said City Couscil has duly ca,iidered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and ivory part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of—s -d —work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in sa!d report be, and each of then are hereby, preliminarily + approved and confirmed. SECTION 2• That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment confirmed. District are hereby preliminarily approved and ; land in saETd� sessmenthDistri proposed t rooporrttionstote upon stimated benefit to be i received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incuental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily rQproved and confirmed. l SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for —Tic purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the Proposed district, ;P u^ RESOLUTION NO. ? ]•psY A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, an Februar 4, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act :• of 1972; and ` WHEREAS, the City Engineer has +dada and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and + WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each aid every part ther -of, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE K IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o7sald —work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, + contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr SW—in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are her—y preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in safU sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for-TFe—purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. '3 Nil ai RESOLUTION NO. g 7 - ps5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORRIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION, TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Desert Lion of York: That the public interest and canvenlence requ re an sse n en -on of this City Council to forty a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w n roadway r�w;y enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance Dlstrtct,NO. 30. KCTION 3. Descri Eton of Assessment District: That the contemplated win the op n on o sa y nc s o more than local or ordinary public heneflt, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines sham upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 36 maps is on file to the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of En sneer: The City Council of. said City by ResolutionrWas iipproved the repori of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled wEngineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance + District No. 30 is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and i extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. 1 .n k� F� R4 4 SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected—!F-TFe--s&w--fTne AnU sane: manner as County taxes 'are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that an March at to hour of pm Tn—TFe City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all parsons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carr,ed out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in whirl each signer thereof 1s interested, sufficient to Identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the haring, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTIM 7. Landsca 1n and L1 htin Act of 1972: All the work hersin propose sTiall a carr ed through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be I"-d pursuan to Section 61961 of verrwn Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily RR2rt a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. `� .e ■ ?r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 61 I "a TO: City Council and City Manager um FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943, and 12944 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn) as Annexation No. 1 and setting the date of public hearing for March 4, 1987. 1 RECOMIBIDATION ` It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 1 ano setting the date of cr regarding City's Intention e desribed t acts t StreetLightingMaintena eDistr ct No 5 (Caryn). Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval Is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943 and 12944 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 for Annexation No. 1 and setting the public herring date for March 4, 1987. Also attached for Council considr•jtion is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Res f submitted, s RHM. Attachments PV. qiy` ;yam RN ai4�i�4fi'�,iS'. r:av,_ a_...k.`t4•T.i!xF'. ✓ - ��s: , r r 1 C� t.1nD IV MMLDONOUSN DEVELD1%NENT OONPORAU C t 1 V pt :y - October 3, 1985 '�r.l L CITY Of RANCHO CUCAuu.4c, EWAKERING Omspin City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline, Unit C P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Attention: Engineering Department. Re: Street Light Maintenance District Gentlemen As the proposed developers of Tracts 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943, and 12944, this is to authorise you, to annex the above - captioned tracts into your,Street Light Maintenance District and into the local Land- scape Maintenance District at such time as the tracts are recorded. Very truly yours, MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPIINT CORPORATION B Patil N. Byrn * President /sl Apr •, _• - . PAW EAST. SURE 1550 LAS ANGELES r, r.� y e i r• e i CITT OF RANCHO CUC.'VMG4 Engineer's Report ft* Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 Annexation no. 1 for Tracts 12936, 12938, 12939. 1294', and 12944 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1. Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit •A• into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. S. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessre:its established by the district are: The furnishing of services and jaterials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of coidominiusa with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION I. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of ap ;roval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subiect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagras for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed nalntenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacewent of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. t: SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be- incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on av2ilable data, c, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (including Annexation No. 1 comprised of 410 units and 129 -580OL street lights,and 0 -9500L street lights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps Lamps ' Lamp Size* YTO Annexed Rate 5800L 81 48 58.93 9500L 0 0 $10.16 +High Pressure Sodium Vapor Laws Rate Mo's Total 129 X $8.93 X 12 $13,823.64 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - $13,923.64 • $29.41 /year /unit No. of s In srci 410 - $29.41 divided by 12 - S2.45 /mo. /unit ;r Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. r SECTION 5. Assessme:t Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 •, Annexation No. 1. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each ; unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. r. h ^. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to A r,: District. ��c A 4 SECTION 7. Order A. 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's f Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all test' ny and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every yaar in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the irAlvidual assessments. �} t If EXHIBIT 'A• 's ;yY Properties and iaprovementi to be included within Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 5 PROJECT PIK 5800L Tract 12936 48 9 Tract 12938 56 U a Tract 129'9 34 7 Tract 1ZS43 47 10 Tract 19944 If 'a .fi. y ;o E RESOLUTION N0. g 7 DJ v A RESOLUTIONN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 WHEREAS, on February 4, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as ,*quired by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has s:de and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and vHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report ano each and every part thereof, and finds tha,, each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requtr+_s or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate af the itemized costs and expenses oo said — work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc—MR —in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said -( esaent District in proportion to the estimated, benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said repert shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for iFe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. , u` a,!�:.a Q}p RESOLUTION NO. ?7 -OV A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CUI FORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUAAT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOM, THEREFURE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Mork: That the public interest and convenience r an u e n en on of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Mork: The foregoing described work 1s to be located wTEhinroadway r— i9i:%o enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. I to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 50. SECTION 3. Desert Lion of Assessment District: That the contempla eE � Grin the ap n on o sa y Louncil, is or more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lints showy upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 51 maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of En ineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution NTo �Fas approve repor of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 50 is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be Collected at the same time and in the sane manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file n report annually with the City Council of said City and said Couun'c'ill will annually conduct a hearing upon /` ' _ + n � said report at their first regular meting to dune, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. 'Time and Place of Waring. Notice is hereby given that on March 'T; Mllat. the how of-i `pe in the City Council Chambers at 9161 t. Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said. work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description'bf the property in which each signer' thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be dellvnred to the City Clark of said City prior to the ti: set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections 'will be considered. If the signer of any protest Is not sham upon the last equalized assessment roll of San lernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest mutt contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. ' Lamdsc in and L1 tin Act of 1972: All the work herein propose ss all a care rou n pui name of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Lahwsc!pfng and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Higkaays Code or the State of California. SECTICd 8. PLblicatlon of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be P-0 pursuanitSecf %n o ermw Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attezt to the seem, and the City Clerk shall cause the saw to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily !"2 t a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ar o' 1o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. r C "v, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 b( `tj�f' T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Magulra, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide W&IECT: Approval to Annex fact Nos. 9649, 10016, 11606 -2 thru -5, 11626, 11793, 11932, 12726, 12727, 12801, 13066, 15117, 13203 and Parcel Map No. 9916 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (City -wide) as Annexation No. 30 and setting the date of public hearing for March 4, 1987 RELO WNDATION it is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. �D and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Analysts /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's Intent to annex Tract Nos. 9649, 10076, 11606 -2 thru -5, 11626, 11793, 11932, 12726, 12727, 12601, 13066, 13117, 13203 and Parcel Map No. 9916 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation No. 30 and setting the public hearing date for March 4, 1987. Also attached for Council < consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of 'the 4 Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Respedl;w.t, submitted, s ` Attachments /15 e s•. n. 1� August 6, 1986 Linda Beek, Engineering Technician City of Rancho Cucamonga 9370 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tract Number 9649/39 Lots Alta Loma, California Dear Linda: We hereby request that the above referenced tract be included in the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District the City of Rancho Cucamonga. for Should you have any questions, to contact me. please do not hesitate very truly yours, �PENNNILL COMPANY ,.S.S'c S�.ti �'•.� Williarl E. Garwin President WEG:dnh 18 /P T7m PUNUML COKPARY. R./IWl wwd CammrtcW Dr ; S95 The C1ry D"M Sand Flom. r"V, CWfomIY 92698 (7 14) 97B ew - r ^ -`� ": i March 12, 1986 1 RECEIVED LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT unv OF ROM CUCAUONCA tKINEER-MG DARSIUN City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -0807 Re: Tract #10076 Country Manor II 19 Single Family Homes Gentlemen: Please he advised that Lightner Development 8 Contracting wishes to Join the Landscape and Lighting District for the tract referenced above. Sincerely, LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT GEORGE li GHTN GHL /sg ' 7B0 NO.snauWf4.��, Eluc.ZOa. U04ntiCKb��01�06 .(71aJBap.�m171erIS� t� WEST END INVESTMENTS, LTD., A CALIFORNIH•LIMIIED PARTNENSHIP 8634 Varnelian Avenue _ Rancho Cucamonga, California JI1O1 (714) 987 -6328 FEBRUARY 15, 1986 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REi Landscape /Lighting Maintenance District, Tract 11606 -29 11606 -3, 11606 -4, awJ 11E06 -5. Gentlemen( West End Investments, LtD., requests that you allow Tract 11606 -2, 11606 -3, 11606 -4, 11606 X located 1/4 East of Haven on Victoria, to Join the Landscape /Lignting Maintenance Districts. Sincerely Yours, WEST END INVESTMENTS, LTD., ' A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PART RSHIP BY C. DOUGLAS 0 RGEN GQ:ERAL PA- 41—R RECEuVEp FEB 14 1996 ph Of Mme, EliguaEURg t af"�'I t i' V 1� 1• O W- P , Ghiof`� ' s ktr Of PAIICHO CUCA409O% fh01NFERINO p;y��7 November 8, 1985 - Engineering D3partment Attentions Linda Desk P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tract No.11626 Dear No. Beaks This is to rapast that Tract No.11626 join the Landscape and Lighting Naintance District in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Sincerely; DyjiW48 M. Mots, Preside 5316 E. Cahpman Avenue #100 Oran a CA 92669 U (714) 997 -9560 JNMthm traP.0 .t w Fi �R y_•{ l .< f '!ski -, ..• /�/ '•�,�:�° W.�.: PENNFIELD DEVELOPMENT, INC. 170 East 17th Street, Suite 110 Costa Mesa, California 926EI (714) 643 -3366 + February 14, L986 l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 Basellne Road, Suite C ^' Post Office Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 s n' RE, L4ndsc4pe /Llghtin2 Maintenance District for Tract 11793 t 6, Gentlemen) P. Pennfield Homes - Alta Loma, a Joint Venture requssss the you allow Tract No. 11753, located on the mast side of Veuthyst between Highland and Lemon Avenues, Join the ` Landscape /Lighting MAintenaC6 Districts. Y sincerely Yours, ' PENNFIELD HOMES - ALTA LOMA, • a Joint Venture .; By its Managing Ventures PEENF DEVELOPMENT, INC. a C• if n!a Cor tion C By, _ /AMES L. GOLFOS. PFJLSIDENT "r c 9 •Sl_ \ ctplrlssea • eA.�wrne«rra • ratveh.pen "aWSo.0mCaqMFwL Swm 2w MMogd Bar, CmHtortgm HR68 (!u)e06OOW January 23, 1986 City Of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, G1 91730 Attn: Linda Beek Reference: Tract No. 11932 Gentlemen: Please to advised that Tract No. 11932 desires to loin the Landscape/ Lighting Maintenance District. Very Trull Teurp, [C I. X... Inc. / /� '� .a. �& . Carl T. Kobbins, Jr. President CK /dae r a` c t r m i MEN 4 • October 9, 1985 City of Btacho Cucamonga Caemmity Development Departernt P. C. Do: 907 Rancho Cttcanonga, CA 91730 Attantiont Unda Be 8Ht Tract No. 12716 CO. 1:r,p OiY OF Pa. , LIICIM(�e4 � y,�DONO,I Ccntlement On behalf of otr e11 +nt, A-M Caepaay, we hereby n'goest peaLeait'o to join. the City -Nude Street Lighting and Maintenance District for the above referanced Tract. Ve��!✓^ Peter Nostrand PNtaj cc, A -M Company 2956 AIRWAY AVENUF. I1-2 s COSTA MEEK CA 92626 (711) 966-M - <�F �`ra , t'u BOYER ENGINEERING CO.' a •" CITY 03 R.;nfio CUCAi0:IG1 Eh ^a9EERdt+ O:Yi$ayl August 2, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community De.•elopment Department P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91710 Attention* Linda Bank Re* Tract NO. 12727 Gentlemen: Gn Behalf of our client. A -11 Company, ve hereby request permission to join the City -Wide Street Lighting and Maintenance District for the above referenced Tract. very truly yours,, y Dave Gillette DO*aj cc* A -M Company ' 2930 AMWAY AVENtM 5-2 + CC WA MESA, CA 92626 • (714) 966-M hja'SY � �- - r s4'i•. - 1' rf.: 3� '+a. .t. .)1 :J�iRY3 {: /LNa.:�P L t"1iL^ .i.} .J_.- i• RS � f A 4eq '•Sj; A1�9` .Y February, 20, 1986 r a• ii City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject: Request to join Landscape / Lighting District for Tract 12801 PEASE 3 Gentlemen: The Deer Creek Company hereby remiests that the 31 lots within Tract 12801 be annexed into the Landecape /Lighting Maintenance District. • rt is our understanding that there is no fee or charge for •' such annexation and that we will be responsible for one year maintenance on perimeter landscaping. Please notify our office of any action with regard to this request. cincerely,�' Michael D. Vairin Director of Administration and Planning MDV /jP M r 1E DEER CREEK COMPA*N*Y, ' POSI OMCE W',C4R8 A17A LOMA.CAi.1RAN1A191701 •:ris:..ti LY•'S�.'•tnAz .i e�'��: one „�i•r3„S�. n.ai ;r �n a ry HILL WILLIAMS COMPANY r.. SS:U L S=a A:u LaM m RW .� Suer211 -Anxt. CaLlenu92W-, d W 42NAN G_ . G i= February 1B, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 "C" Baseline Road Rancho Cucumonga, CaliforDi■ 91701 Rat Tract 13066 Landscape and Li•ghtilr Districts Honorable " +.y Council: Pursuant to the condition* of approral for Tract 13066, Hill- Vtllius Da Val opaent Corpora- tion does hereby inform the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga of the intent to join landscape and lirhting districts on behalf of our Tract Ho, 13066 (located on the South side of 19th Scres• betveen Amethyst Street and Clusman Street ). If there are any questions or comments, please call. Very truly yours, RILL- WILLIAMS DBRLOPRBRT CORP. Richard H Centel, P.C. Engineering Project manager RC :mlb /(p A3 DWIGUL F. FRENCH, INC. 712 N. Diamond Bar Boulevard - (714) 594.2943 Diamond Bar, California 91765 - (2131912.5321 :1 ;- n ±, p February 11, 1988 wo OF RMNCNO CICANONCA _ L?!t INEERING DMI,?- A Mr. Lloyd Hobbs v City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 r Attention: Varian Vartaninas Subject, Le_ndsea Maintpnwce District 1t Fhase I of Tract 12873) P if8mes; c. Dear M. Hubbs: In behalf of Paragon Homes, Inc., request is hereby made for annexation of 'hose landscaped areas within Tract Number 13117, bordering Haven Avenue and Banyan 'treat, Into th,, appropriate landscepe/Ilghting maintenance district. The landscape and Irrigation plans for the areas to be maintained are In their thlN chock and are expreted to be approved In the very near future. Very truly yours, c. Al Ve'.asquez AV:jn cc: Brien Catalde Paragon Homes n ±, p r' w r In�,lterte�a� 6wt��eM . ' d"o of .g rcreo,mon eor /.hers �IwIrIM Intl telly de.a mu 102 minw uu. monooam Jur.t 9, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Ste. C Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Attn: Linda Beek, Engineering Division Re: ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS /TRACT 1320/3 Dear Ms. Beek, We would like to request that the subject Tract 13202 be annexed to existing Landscape and Street Lighting Districts that may exist to service this property. Should you have any questions, plecao do not heatitato to contact me at (714 370 -0200. Thank you for your assistance. Yo a Gary r Planning /De ROBERTSON HOMES /SOUTHERN a division of CATWIL CORPORATION GM /cs .e ty' JJc - 'Te Y :m n Wald /Pink %Cripps Crockett Realtors 7101 W. Manchester Ave. LA, CAL 90045 July 2, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga Enginaerinq Dept. 9320 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, Calif 91730 Re:Parcel Map 9916 This is a request to join the city Wide landscape Distzlct in connection vith Tentative Parcel Map 9916. Thank yyou,�� 0J Werner Wald Frank Fink 76 Joiii tine al Irene Helen Fink t� CITY CP RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 30 for Tracts 9649, 10076, 11606 -2 thru -5, 11626, 11793, 11932, 12726, 12727, 12801, 13066, 13117, 13203 and Parcel Map 9916 SECTION 1. Authority for Revert This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Descriotian This City Coanctl has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District N0.1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have An effect upon Ali lots Ytthln Tract Nos. 1469, 10076, 11606 -2 thru -5, 11626, 11793, 11932, 12726, 12727, 12601, 13066, 13117, 17203 and Parcoi NAP 9916 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped Areas to be maintained In the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -ray or easements to bn granted to the city of Rancho Cucamonga. f SECTION 3. glans and Syecificattons The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and :s approved by the city Engine -ring Divitlon. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans r and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is 1 hereby made a part of this report to the sass extent as if said plans .nd y. specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway taproveaent construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Kaintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 30 comprised of 722,221.00 square feet of landscaped area) is shown below: y /7/ 4 V Total Anrual Maintenance Cost YTD $.30 % 722,221 square feet $216,666.30 Per Lot Annual Assessment S2'06t f lUQY 66.300 $28.07 MR Per Lot Monthly Assessment $28.07 $2.34 =— Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial cr colle"or streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district bu. will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and lateled "Exhibit A', by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION S. Assessment improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots wish n the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to is recovered throuWfi assessments as required by the Landscape aad Lighting /.ct of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approvel of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and eeterm4nes to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Ray, the City Engine6r files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing "and. approves, or modifies and app.^ovcs the individual assessments. a. Properties ana improvements -to be Included within Mnaxatton No. 30 to 's Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: �- NAINIAINED AREA DEVELOPEMIXT L .__ 9649 39 Wilsor. 0 6,672 10076 19 Hermosa 0 1,524 11606 -2 :1606-3 Trail 0 0 225 '•6UG -4 2n Trail 0 Soo 6-5 .06 Trail { 11626 N2 0 0 ' 11793 47 0 11932 10 Haven Avenue 0 2,360 12726 33 0 0 12727 27 0 0 a 12801 98 cdnyan/Haven 0 5,125 13066 27 19th St. 0 5,450 2r 13117 302 Haven 0 0 11,55 41,976 ., Oak-an 13203 (224) 6.5 0 0 v Condos) rr % PM 9916 2 Haven 0 1,360 -- ;z i rl.! IVA .e M15� 7� a.ri y � tr�..ii /7y 4 ' F�py i;• CITY OF RANCHO C�] + N�(�(�A 71tACT N0. 9649 ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINM MAP N �® ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM k LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 30 ` EXIt 161T "A" •��• •° 011 • • i •O • • art •A • • • � w8 • •0 • 81 v .o- A y A + O /7y 4 ' F�py i;• CITY OF RANCHO C�] + N�(�(�A 71tACT N0. 9649 ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINM MAP N �® 1 I l I' i r M �M 6 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. S ANNEXATION NO. 30 E X H I B I T W % � i Y• .Nr .s. wir � t I Y fin! 6 VI�V fYV p�w� n.•.� . /� , O � 1 I •, I�I.Y 1] 10 • • , i 14 is is n is l^w trawl wiw Pw� (raw Q c.+-t / 7� :[ rY OF P JINCHO CUCANK ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP AIuCT No. 10076 N \\ ,, r, , ,, 1 1 r, C .1 . . _1 I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 �mll mlar 1 N0. IIII _ m m i - L I ftt ��Y er • _a lo Yid IDY I ` YY - iV aaY • r • i �� I I i pOHL" MAD" - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAb1pNCA Tiucr' 80. 11793 Zt ENGINEERING DIVISION T 6 � VICINITY MAP � /7g lv {{ 4 !Y.1 Y. f1A 0�f: G k a ASSESSMEW DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3O EXHIBIT "A" i 1•f FRcfa1Y m" ri / 0 010 0 0 nICITY OF RANCHO CLCANK t3 ENGINEERING DlVI51ON r? TRACT N0. 11932 , a t ri / 0 010 0 0 nICITY OF RANCHO CLCANK t3 ENGINEERING DlVI51ON r? TRACT N0. 11932 , a f ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE .MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION N0, 30 E X H 1l IT "A" ` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA TI ENGINEERING DIVISION ' T VICINITY MAP 1Ol� lv 7=176� ... F ✓ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE - MAINTENMNCE DISTRICT NO. 1. ANNEXATION NO. 30 E X H 1! 1 T "A" ■ HOcs .1 -- •- V t' .L � TL - - �i .- ;f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP /$/ Vr. T 1V ■ HOcs .1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3O E X H 10IT "A" I , .fir t, a •ice.. .�.� br... �,.e e._.. �,.a �:..... m .� V � i rrn .L Jj7 _ i 'cis cs r; CITY OF RANCHO CUCANK7NCA rnACT Ho:_ "xeoi ENGINEERING DIVISION `' ; VICINITY MAP i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LAND:CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NC. 3D EXX 1 1 T "A" IN CITY OF RANCHO CUCANION � ENGINEERING DIVISION EF C VICINITY MAP /83 I A N utt 'tsnt, 0 r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. .t ANNEXATION N0. 30 14 • Y CO LEK .F sac= .Fl ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP lgy TRA, Cyr s1rE NaaaaaWO ki TV�rT `Yfl 1I11D ti I i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 30 E X M I E I T "A" TRAC�L NO. 12040 . .104 /01 -03 Gs C ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMFNC C f; ENGINEERING DIVISION �8S VICINITY MAP /S$ � 07 LAS LOrI am.e 9'I r r e TRACT, NO:'13203 r'a 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. .I. ANNEXATION NO. AO E X 1D IT "A" Iwr.l wl dYA.l w T4'IbNQ. (� Y, �1 I/.2tIL 2 + p 9111 AC ILA h I 21 22 u ` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARCEL HAP ENGINEERING DIVISION w T Y VICINITY MAP �gW l� RESOLUTION NO. 97-05T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ARNEXATION NO. 30 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on February A, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required bj, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has aede and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, .aid City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, -nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ranclio Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1; That the Engineer's Ertimate of the Itemized costs and expenses o7 s-id —work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of there are hereby, preliminarily ' approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and de-0-in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land to sa sessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, res^ectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's s Report for purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 77-05/9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 30 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIFE AND PLACE FOR HEARING 0BJECTICI:S THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri Lion of Ko -k: That the public interest and convenience requ re an i s e Intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated 'for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract sap within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described to Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation, includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w t n r adwyy riyhiTay and landscaping easements of Landscapb Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 30 to Landscape Maintenance District No. • 1•, `- SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: ..That the contempla elwor , in the opinion of Sala 411Y Louncil, 15 Or more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the- •apense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district 1s ausessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Aanexation No. 30 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1• heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. •, indicating by said boundary E lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on 1 file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. .'i r ,r SECTION i. Report of�En Engineer: The C4ty Cot ,cil of said City by -." Resolution No. as appro - -vie the reporf of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 30, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected afi>c same me an n same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin : Notice is hereby given that on March W7-198T at the hour of p.m. n the City Council Glaabers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucannga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should rot be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clark of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protust is not shown upon the lest equalized ossessoent roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Ld nin a r ti Act of 1972: All the work herein proposc �iall in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be—a-&W pusuan to Section 61951 of vernmen Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the data s•t for the hearing, at least once to The Oaiill Re ort a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of am to a f�nia, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C,1cwAa STAFF REPORT ff " o � 0ATE: February 4, 1987 > um TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 13027, 13057, 13058, 13059, 13060 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943, and 12944, DR 85-01, and DR 9 -33 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (City -wide) as Mnexation No. 18 and setting the date of public hearing for March 4, 1987. RECOMP00ATIOM It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Mnexation No. 18 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 13027, 13057, 13058, 13059, 13060, 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943, and 12944, DR 85 -01, and DR 85 -33, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation No. 18 and setting the public hearing date for March 4, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the $ Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. RespecIful4ir suWtted, Attachments v x F ✓ : � r � _ _ rn: _..qr c.. Sanfoyj � ✓i%WILLIA.�I LYON�vm�ian�r 8540 ARCHIBALD, SUITE B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91770 • 1714) 980-2244 May 6, 1986 Lloyd Hobbs City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Districts 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subjecti Tract 13027 Dear Lloyd, This is to request annexation to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance D cts for subject tract. ReApmkfully. Ford Manager SF /lmb i S W. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT �" ;��,h%Y i•''yvi.. t��. 't+.`''i s � s2:i` r'_.- .,L"..i*��jt`�,„Zd' 9ti i .%.% \V1T..LIA11i LYON�vr�fas�. . 8540 ARCiIBALD, SLUE 8, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 1714) 980.2244 _ July 21, 1986 Lloyd Rubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject, Tract 13057 Deer Lloyd, This letter is to request annexation to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts. , 9 - [fully, even Ford Project Manager SF,lmb iZv wv 4EAI lSTAT! DEVELOPMENT �;�; r�:.%„��,,i i .r } "B, -1 f+Fia'•.in'.4 . / / A .50"WILLIAM LYON's�an�r 8540 ARCHIBALD, SURE B. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 • 171A1 980.2244 July 22, 1986 Lloyd Hobbs City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject: Tract 13058 Dear Lloyd, This letter is to request annasation to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts. Reccttf✓'ulll'y, Project Manager SPtlmb 1 '' REAL ES,AT! DEVELOPMENT i1.-W-Dt HI!^ J '.d`�L�ci'�..!•`.)'/:i'i'y -�,; ACi': _iJ,v _.:z J -A ?'aN f ' it F: ,G 6 WILLIAM LYO r �TGImwax�r ' 8540 ARCHIBAID. SUITE B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 • 17141 980-2244 r 'w 3 July 2, 1986 s � Lloyd Hobbs • City of Rancho Cucamonga , 9720 Baseline Road, Suite C , Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 L` �! Subjects Tr. 13039 ` Dear Lloyd, r� This is to request annexation to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance ' Districts for subject tract. , Re ec[ fully, M 6� {! a en Pord . Project Manager _ l�e. SPslmb - kCi - - -' ','-,REAL lSTAT! DEVELOPMENT �y � sr 'v 1 `H "' t,4. •x.: •._ Yi;t?dy`5',:y3 .Y:: 'T-sYff �.iiy� \�'.r� +��.rti�tA:4 .i" .'i SLIHD +a ! UNVILLIAcM LYON m�%isjr , 8340 ARCHIBALD. SUITE 8, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 • (714) 980.2244 .i, s; ,• July 2, 1986 Lloyd Hobbs .� City of Rancho Cucomongs 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C ' Y , Rancho Cucimonga, California 91730 y'. ;e Subjects Tr. 13060 3' 'a' ., Dear Lloyd, •, This is to request annexation to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts for subject tract. Reonfully, an Pord Project Manager F'x ' F M' l • tY;. C Yv ri� y �y)�_r ;` },�'�'yr +•. s • ',.T,j,� , / REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ..lW "Y ����W .liFYi•��SA 5: �� \� °fit W��t.. i'}YYIG�!�(y -!v. ..) �t -] Iti4 t MARLBOROUGH OEVEIBAINFJVT CORPORA .. F NJ g_. October 3, 1985 CITY OF WICNO CUCAUUNGA ENGINEERING DIYISIUn City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline, Unit C L P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 U . .Attentions Engineering Department. ` Re: Street Light Maintenance District b ,, °• Gentlemen: ' An the proposed developers of Tracts 12936, 12938, 12939, 12943, and 119441 this is to authorize you t to annex the above - captioned tracts into your Street S Light Maintenance District and into the local'Land- „• scope Maintenance District at such time as the tracts are recorded. F; Very truly yours. MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION �� V ,.. B� Pahl N. B rn ,ca President F•' xN; w f•L ' !: /sl s, •t t. •r Y! x q?.: S + ' CNE&AI? RY PLAZA. 2039 CENTURY PARK EAST. SUffE1&W LOS ANGELES. CAUFORNIA 9000? (213)951 -3t71* 4 "7y1' i. ii•; :=_" L t�si. e'•rt•f';.T! °: .. .. ;�• A r', teat+ ?f E if 7- July 2. 1986 S City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 'C' Basel.ne Road Rancho Cucamonga. CA. 91701 r Attn: Linda Beek Re: Rudolph Heodrickson Seniors Project 6618 Amethyst St. .s ' We are hereby requesting permission to join the Rancho Cucamonga �. Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District. May thanks for your assistance. Sincerely, T VELOPMENT CORP.. J ia�r/iilllle M. ArrE «. ' General Manager ..,ss MMA:sf ,Y 9-eFM-Lf- NLANAVF- ,':,RANCHOCUCANIO GA.CALIFORVL1J1730 . (714)965.1 rj` `�•"'t' ; «.. y" °.,':..y CRY OF RANCho CRCandtfr'I IVNEERING wont, ?f E if 7- July 2. 1986 S City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 'C' Basel.ne Road Rancho Cucamonga. CA. 91701 r Attn: Linda Beek Re: Rudolph Heodrickson Seniors Project 6618 Amethyst St. .s ' We are hereby requesting permission to join the Rancho Cucamonga �. Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District. May thanks for your assistance. Sincerely, T VELOPMENT CORP.. J ia�r/iilllle M. ArrE «. ' General Manager ..,ss MMA:sf ,Y 9-eFM-Lf- NLANAVF- ,':,RANCHOCUCANIO GA.CALIFORVL1J1730 . (714)965.1 'R a M The UARMAKIAN May 7, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering: Linda Beek 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Lomita Court Apartments at 9600 Lomita Court Dear Linda: Please accept this letter as our request to join the landscape lighting district to the City of Rancho Cucuamonga. Please call me at 989 -5533 if I can be of any assistance. SinLerely, THE BARMAKIIAAN�COMPANY Bruce Barmakian Vice President BB /jbl 9375ARCHIRALU AVENUE SUITE101 • RANCHOCUCANIONGA . CAUFCANIA917M 714W.0427 i'm '-�iDeveloprnent -� - Brbkerag4;;` -s: Property management Architecture Engine rmq , ;uL I a!` •��ixTrt��:R?t.1�2i.Z•:i� ?� ti- ��7i`�`.. °?=:.iS��i / 1. :� , a�w'r:.y'�i•:y H` t S r• r; i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineers Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation "no. 18 for Tracts Mos. 13027, 13057, 13058, 13059, 13060, 12936, 12938 12939, 12943, 12944 and DR 85 -01 and OR 8543. SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit W Into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and mattrials for th1 ordinary and usual maintenance, ope•ating and servicing of street light improvements on artert: and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance ,is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be dIvideJ on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and apaclflcations for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference 'Is hereby oade to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the Individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the samx: extent is if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. �f sa:y �c �k� it I•xw..' it.'S ''�r T.:�.• -_ .. i. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No.18 comprised of 12,124 units and 398 -95001. street lights, 280- 9500L street lights and 12 -27, 500L street lights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and LierCy: Lamps Lamps Lamp Size* YTD Annexed Rate 9500L 392 4 $10.16 5800L 280 0 $8.93 27.5001. 10 2 $15.31 ^_ *Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps Rate No's Totai 396 X $10.16 X 12 $48,28D.32 280 X 5 8.93 X 12 • 30,004.80 12 $15.31 X 12 2M 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost • $80 439.76 56.63 /year /un1! No. of Units in OIstT =c $lz lz4.OU $6.63 divided by 12 • $ .55 /mo. /unit s Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained to Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment 0iagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 •, Annexation No. 18. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. 4: Gov P• t 1T. .t SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is sore than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of ,- assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. a i; It is proposed that sli future development shall be annexed to the District. ` SECTION 7. Order of Events r 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's y , Report. -- 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, .considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. i i, t: �/ t r Yf F i Y s I k} ,2 EXHIBIT W Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: � T ID47 0 i Arterial PROJECT 9 9500L DR 85 -01 1 168 apts 0 .5 0 0 OR 85-33 7 72 apts • .5 0 0 TR 13027 1 157 4 4 2 TR 13057 1 147 0 0 TR 13058 2 203 0 0 TR 13059 1 137 0 0 TR 13060 6 66 0 0 TR 12936 4 48 0 0 TR 12938 5 56 D D ;R 12939 3 34 0 0 TR 12943 4 47 0 0 TR 12944 5 58 = =0 0 i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAUCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 18 EXHIliT "All w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JA � � COUNTY OF SAN BnNARDERO IW I SPATZ OF CALIlMA .P03 1-1 1-1 1 .1 " I " , , u ■ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 18 EXHIBIT V1 r CIW OF IMCH0 CUC"ONGA DR e5-01 OOUNT! 0111 BAN BsYNASDIIiO —T] ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING .MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 18 EXHIBIT "A" CPP7 0! XMC80 CUUMOMA t COUN17 01 SAN E NATE 01 CALIIOUIIA A DR 65-33 r RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE UITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTkICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on February 4, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each 1 and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should.be modified to any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses osaid —work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of then are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: last the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descrrT50 —in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said-M—essment District to proportion to the estimated benefit to he received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for--flipurposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. IV V RESOLUTION NO. g 7 •0C, I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING NAINTEIANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of Cie Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Uork: That the public interest and convenience requiro and it is the intention of thls city Council to fom a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance aid operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related fac'littes in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w—TiFTnroadway igliio� enumerated in the report of tho City Engineer and more particularly described on amps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1% SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the conteapla war , n the op n on o see y aunt s IF more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which dittrict is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Naintmance District No. 1• maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution NE—i"eas approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report 1s hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessma)t shall be collected a{ i e sun me a n sane manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report mnually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon a„ S. ■ 9K said reportlat their first regular meting in* Jura, at whlch -tie assessmentsf g for the next fiscal year will De determined. SECTI* S. Time area Place of Hearing: Notice is he given- that-on March 4, 1987, at the hour of 7 :30 psi in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of- Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to, the Mora: cr extent of, the assessaent district, may appear and show cause why said work- should not be, d-ne or carried out or why said district should not be formed in atmordan-.e with this Resolution of Intention. Protests gut be in writing and oast contain a description, of tree_, proper;v in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify" the swat, and must bs dellvercd to the City Clerk of said City prior `.o the tine set for' the hearing, and no other protests or, objections will- be considereil. If the.signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessaent roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property descr44ed in the protests, then such protest cost contain or be accompnleJ by written evidence that such signer 1sAhe owner of-the property so describud. SECTION 7: Landscaping and Lightinq Act of 1972: At the work herein pr55Fs -e - shall Se pow ed-through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated -the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION S. Publication of Resolution or intention: Published notice shall be gir-i pursuniio�ec oiT n�I46 o we iiavarrnk Code. , The Maw shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the wawa, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the bedriny, at least once in The DaiillyR_mort� a newspaper of genera, circulation published in the City ofd of i —mirnia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. : 1�% i��*�il�t,1. xRk,Y'�/: V �Y ORDINANCE NO. 306 AN ORDINANCE 07 IRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MMOPMT DISTRICT MAP 710M MEDIUM 'M" (6-14 TO OYl /ICE) OFESIIODALO 701 5 POP- FOR 6.2 ACRYA, OMCB/PEOFE SIONAL POP" FOR 1.55 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON TEE NORTRNIST CORNER OF HICILAND AVESOE AND HAVER AVEROL - APR 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43, AND 201 - 263 -01 TRtWCH 25. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds+ and deterainss the foliwing: , • .. - A. This City Council has held a public hearing in the time and uoner prescribed by lav and duly board and considered said recommendation. E. That Development District Amendment No. 84-031 is consistent vitb the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This Development District Amendment No. 64-038 mill have no significant smrironmental impact as provided to the Negative Declaratlon tiled herein. SSCT108 Zt The foliwing described real property is hereby reclasvified in the manner stated, and the Development District Nap is hereby amended accordingly. A. Assessor's parcel Nwbers 201- 262 -23, 31, 41, 43, portion of 30, and 201 -263 -01 through 25 approximately 5 acres in site -hall be changed from Medina Density M" (8-14 do /ac) Residential to Lose itedium Residential "LM" (4-8 du /ac). R. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201 - 262 -36 and 37, approximately 1.55 acres in size shall be changed from Medium Dendty IA" (8-14 du/ac) Pesidential to Office /pro£essioual 'W ". C. The porticos of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 262 -30, 31, and 40 south. of the fntmre re- aligmment of Higbland Avenue and north of the future freway rigbt- of-vay, approximately 6.2 acres in size *ball be changed from Medium Density Ste (6-14 do /ac) to Office/Frofessiowl. u0Pe. r j1d•+F n' 9 ereS, � • ,l•• ( t f r • • an e. ,SPCTION 9: The Wayne. oball sign thin Ordietnee and the City Clock a �i *ball cause the seen to be peblisted vitbin fifteen (15) dell after its Passage- at least net in The Lily aspect, a newspaper of general circulation publisted• in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cueamougs, California. x PASSED, APPROIED, and ADDPT1D this day of , 1987. ATaS: eon: ABSENT: Deeain L. Stout, Kolar ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk I, BEVERLT A. ADTRRLRT, CITY MUK of the Cit-, of Rancho Cuceeoega. California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance vas introduced at a regular s:eeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cueaaooga bold on the 21st day of January, 1957, and was fivally passed at a regular meeting of the City •1 COu ^CBI of the City ^f Rancho Cucaronta held on the a day of e, 19". S Executed this A, day of e, E9t* at Rancho Cawsep, California. v Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk •r +eF rl' �• „��1 T 1A.4 !3: • ':.:.,a �:, +.._'Jr :!]i ?u%ixld+a.�'N L ORDINANCE 10. 307 AN ORDINANCS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCEO CUCAMONGA. CA%IEOANIA, CREASING AN ADVISORY COI0Q3SION TO ACT III AN ADVISORS CAPACITY TO TEN CITY COOpCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION The Ci Cy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Repealing of Ordinance 294. SECTION 2: There is and &ball remain in the city Sweetmeat an Advisory Commiasion. SECTION 3: The Ramcho Cucamonga Advisory Commission shall act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and Planning Commission on c nity issues and other such Advisory matters as may be delegated to it by the City CsvucII, or brwght to its attemtiem by any cit -Rem of the City. The purpose of the Advisory Commission Is to enhance communication between citizens and the City Council, increase involvement of the counnity in decision making and advance citizen issues. The Advisory Commission is encouraged to adopt a formal procedure for community interaction. SECTION 4: The Advisory Comaissim shall consist of a total of nine (9) members with one (1) appointed from each of the three (3) geographic areas, designated by zip code in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, measly Alta Loma (91701), Cuwouga (91730), and Etiwanda (91739), and six (6) appointed at large. NmSers of the Advisory Commission shall be residents of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be appointed by the City Council. A subcommittee of the City Council shall submit to the City Council the name of any person proposed for appointment to the Advisory Commission and upon such appointment by the City Council, the none of the appointee shall be recorded in the minutes of the City Council meeting. SECTION S: The time (9) members of the Advisory Commission shall each serve two (2) year terms. Either five (S) or four (4) members of the Advisory Commission shall be considered annually by the City Council as set forth below. In the year which five (3) Advisory Commission members are considered, then the three (3) members designated from the geographic areas shall be considered along with two (2) at largo members. In the converse year, the four (4) ambers shall be at large appointments. In any case, a member @ball continue in office until hit /her respective successor is appointed as set forth balm unless sooner removed as provided in this Ordinance. If a vacancy shall occur, other than by expiration of the ten of office, it shall be filled by appointment of the City Council for the remainder of the unexpired ten. All regularly expiring terms shall terminate on December tbirty -first of each year. A ) 4, I ■ 1!- al of Nemberg• r SECTION 6: Members of the Advisory Commission sera at tk@ Pleasure of tke City Caemeil, and may be removed at any regularly scheduled City Council meeting, open three (3) working days' prior written notice to the member. Removal shall be by majority vote of the entire City Council. � C � Nothing in tEis section shall be construed to limit thejexpressioms of Advisory Commission members sue and except the guidelines established by the Advisory Commission. ` SECTION 7: Regular meetings of the Advisory Commission @ball be established by Resolution of the Advisory Commiaiou. Offic.re SECTION St the Advisory Commission shall select a chairperson to preside at all meetings of the Advisory Commission, and a vice-cbsirper@on to preside in the absence of the chairperson. The Seera:ary to tbe Advisory Commission sMll be designated by the City Manager. Joint Subcommittee Neetiae SECTION 9: City Council Subcommittee and Advisory Commission Subcommittee (chair and vice- chair) joint meetings shall be held quarterly on the first Tuesday of each calendar quarter which is not a legal holiday. In the event this is a holiday, the setting will take place on the text regular working day. Special meetings may be called as needed by either subcommittee. The joint quarterly subcommittee meetings shall be for the purpose of establishing an Advisory Commission work program and review of matters studied by the Advisory Commission. Additionally, the City Cesxil me PI@naing Commission may designate mark program asigmm n is at anytime met withstanding the regmlarlp scbebled gsartetly meetings. 3SC7101 10i The Mayor shall sign •his Ordinance and the City Clerk @hall cause tLe am* to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dailw Report, a twopaper of general circulation published to the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1997. r 6y� Iy. �W tj3 L� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENt'IRONMENTAL .ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -038 = d - e request to amen an use e eaenT t of � General Plan from Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units /acre) to Neighborhood Commercial for 10.7 acres of land, ic:ated at the northwest corner of Haven and Highland - APH: 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43. ERVIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT /Wk F - CLURMAN COMPANY - A request to amend the eve up�ent str ct p ram 'M" (6 -4 dwelling units /acre) to "NC' for 10.7 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Haven and Highland - APN: 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43. I. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City mane •the requested General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment. If the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolutions of Denial would be appropriate. II. Bactar V. On November 5, 1986 the City Council reviewed a request -6y the Clurmar Company to change the subject properties from Helium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. Denial of this request was recommended by the Planning Commission. The City Council felt that a Neighborhood Commercial land use would not be advisable for the entire northwest corner of Haven and Higghland Avenues and directed staff to initiate a new amendment (GPA 86 -04A and BOA 86 -08) to allow a nix of residential and office uses. III. Action: The City's new amendments were recommended for approval by tie PTanning Commission. At the City Council meeting of January 21, 1987, Council concurred and approved the General Plan Amendment 86 -04A and Development District Amendment 86 -08, changing the land use to Low - Medium Residential and _Pfice uses. As the City amendments have been approved, action on the Clurman request for Neighborhood Commercial should be completed with Resolutions of Denial. •' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 86 -03B b DDA 86 -03 - CLURMAN COMPANY February 4, 1987 Page 2 r Brad gullir .' City Planr.er BB:AN:vc Attachments: Plarning Commission Staff Report of September 24, 1986 Planning Commission Minutes of September 24, 1986 Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 86 -147 b 86 -148 Exhibit "Am - Market-Demand Study Proposed Resolutions n WW�pp u 1 a r . �i4..� N I 1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 5 ��i • .� September 24, 19x6 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-038 - wa,enw { M' - w request to amend the Land We Moment o General Plan from Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) to Neighborhood Commercial for 10.7 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Haven and Highland - APN 201- 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43. ENVIIHNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT rcqquues amend the p Mom (8 -14 dM /ac) to 'NC' for 10.7 acres of s land, located at the northwest corner of Haven and Highland - APN 201- 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43. I. ABSTRACT: A General Plan Amendment and Development District )Wn Firm is requested to change the present Medium Residential designation (4 -14 du /ac) to Neighborhood Casercial for a 10.7 acre property loath at the nortiayst corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue. The applications have been lade by the Clurman Company in anticipation of the development of a neighborhood shopping9 center on the site. At this meeting, the Planning Commission should make a determination on the proposed General Plan and Development District changes. Staff r- commends approval of the request in part. II PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: General Plan Amendment to change the subject properties Medium Residential to Neighborhood and a Development District Amendment to change the subject ?roperties from Medium ('M') to Neighborhood Commercial ('NC'). B. Location: Northwest corner of Haven and Highland Avenues. C. Parcel Size: 10.7 acres (gross). D. Existing Zoning: Medium (•N') Residential. ITEM J �Ll ;t PLAMING COMMISStON'r 'FF ROMT GPA 86-038 4 DOA Wt.., - CLURAW COMPANY September 24, 1966 Page 2 rp E. Existfnqq Land Use: Single family hones with the majority of pfproperty vaunt. - F. Surraundiny land Use and Zaniny:" •" oA rEF g a Tonl1jr cone niui% In the Media ('M) District; vacant land in Oe Neighborhood Commercial ('NI:') District. South - Vacant in the Low PL') District. East - Shopping center (under construction) in the Neighborhood Commercial ('NV') District. w Nest -- Single :ally development in the Low ('L') District. G. General Plan Designations: project site =xt 31r747S du/ac). North - Medina (4-14 oulac) and Heighborhora Commercial: -' South - Proposed freeway. East - Neighborhood Commercial. Nest - Low (2 -4 du /ac). H. Site Characteristics: The subject site is predominaltly vacant w r grasses as the primary vegetation. Topography is generally flat and slopes slightly from north to south. III. ANALYSIS: In review of the application, staff has found three or aspects which are important to the consideration of the land use question. These issois are as follows: A. Re- alignment of Highland Avenue. As a result ofJuture Route ju reeway eve oilmen , y and Avenue is to be re- aligned northeasterly through the site. This action wall result In ',% major dtvlsian of thin site into three separate parcels of approximately 1.55, 1.76 and 3.90 acres (see Exhibit '8'). Appropriateness of trot commercial or multi -family land use_ i•% designations should tike into account the resultant parcel " size, shape and locations. Parcel 1, the 3.9 acre portion will be bordered on three sides by major roadways (Haven, Highland and a freeway on- ramp). itself living Such an arrangement does not lend to a apt]" environment in a residential development. — I " Parcel 2, 1.76 acres, will back up to an existing single family tract to the west and the existing condominium project to the north, and has a 560 foot frontage on the future Highlani Avenue. This site will have a triangular shape and rill be set, 2 back from Haven Avenue by approximately 300 feet. { J PLANNING COMMISSION S* F REPORT GPA 86 -038 R O0A 96 -03 - CLURMMN COMPANY September 24, 1986 Page 3 9 Parcel 3, 1.55 acres, will front on Haven Avenue with a 200 foot depth, bordered on the south by a re- aligned Highland Avenue, single family condominium to the west and a vacant commercial parcel to the north. The applicant has submitted a conceptual site plan (see Exhibit 'B') to show the possibilities of cmurcial ::velopment on all three parcels. The plan is only for information purposes and no has been made ibyistaff.ca(It is noted that 1the�Haven Avenue building setback is incorrectly indicated at 30 feet; 45 fat is required), Further, the applicant has stated that the driveway from the southerly parcel onto Haven is very i ortant to the success of the project. The City Traffic Section has indicated that a driveway so close to the future freeway on- ramp is unacceptable from a traffic control and safety In review of the potential General Plan Amendmsnt, the viability of the comearcial use of each site should be considered as a part of its location and relationship to adjacent land uses (existing or planned). B. The Need for Additional Commercial Land: At staff's request, the app can s pupa ono an ecm c analysis of the land use change to help determine if additional commercial land is warranted for that part of the community. The conclusions from the study are attached with this report which indicate the following; 1. 'There is a substantial market gap for retail development in the City of Rancho Cucaemga has a whole and in the primary trade area for Highland -Haven commercial project, in particular.' Staff generally concurs with the statement. This statement, however, does not address the issue of vacant commercially toned land already in the City and Mat would the market be for commercial projects if they were all to be developed. The economic analysis of the for fts future needs. The amount of commercial development has not yet caught up with the needs of the community but there Is an adequate of commercially zoned N, land to met those needs. As for the needs of the immediate area concerned, only the eleven acre (117,588 square fc of building space) shopping center on the + east side° "f Haven is available to provide retail ; commercial Pvice. The site in question could provide for e J4 for any shot. fall not provided in the new shopping :, area. (� PLANNING COMMISSION f 7 REPORT GPA 86-038 i WA 86.0, - CLURMNi COMPANY September 24, 1586 Page 4 2. 'Based upon these market gaps Tor retail products, the optimal retail outlets for the Highland•Haven commercial project have been identified based upon I location and competitiveness in tM marketplace. Additionally, these retail products can be absorbed in a reasonable time _ period of some two to three years.' 3. 'The potential of the Foothill Freeway lends itself to promoting the viability of commercial development. Staff concurs with this assumption.' ' Staff concurs that certain features -of the site do warrant serious consideration of at least a portion of the site for commercial use as evidenced in the economic study. C. Relationship to General Plan Policies: The General Plan praTdes Tor commercial a uses, one being the Ne'.ghborhood Commercial Designation. This land use type 'include shopping centers and convenience commercial clusters that provide essenttal retail golAs and services to the residents or _ occupants in the 1mrediato vicinity.' 1. Neighborhood Shopping Centers. These centers shall be pro— Tdeed- to meet tYW �e WVT and service needs of a '• cluster of neighborhoods with a total population of roughly 10,000 residents. The primary use within the neighborhood shopping centers shall be a major supermarket and total leasabla 4 rea ranging from 30,000 to 300,000 spare feet. The following provisions shall guide the development of such center. a. The center shall be approximately 5 to 15 acres in size. b. No more than two centers shall be developed at each designated intersection. c. The center shall permit the following tenants:, eating and drinking establishments; food and beverage retail sales, general personal services, repair services for commonplace household appliances;- and retail sales. Administrative and professional offices, medial services, and financial, inshrance" and real estate services may be permitted. - .y ` d. The center shall be located at street intersections of at least collector size or at the intersection of __�,� two major local streets.' '�A ....22 •��,, PLAkNING COMMISSION !' 'FF REPORT GPA 86-038 A DOA 86-6.. - CLURMAN COMPANY September 24, 1986 Page 5 it Bevel opeeds to that a sett fNeighborhood aW oriCommercial of a the Center provisions outlined above as evidenced by Its location and potential commercial needs of the immediate area. Conclusions: The parcel adjacent to the freeway (Parcel 1) is a very difficult site to develop successfully for residential uses, and a commercial land use may can be be an resolved pthrough tmitigation tat� project dlevel. Staff, however, has the following concerns regarding the remaining portions of the site: 1. The re- alignment of Highland Avenue will cause fragmentation of the site acreVesection the (Parcel development abuttsaresidentialodevel center. development On two sides. Its buildable portion fronts on a collector street (Highland) and is approximately 400 feet from Haven Avenue. These conditions raise land use questions as to the appropriateness of this parcel for commercial purposes. 2. The northerly most section (1.55 acre, Parcel 3) is separated from the main parcel fronting on Haven and therefore may not easily tie In with the majority of a commercial development. If however, thn northerly portion was integrated in a development with the vacant Darcel further north, then a larger, more viable, development could be possible. It may be appropriate to study the land use issue of this section of the site in conjunction with the land use to the north. Staff has prepared three preliminary land use alternatives which include the properties to the north. A study of the possibilities (Exhibits Cl, C2, and C3) should be separate from this application and staff would therefore recommend tnat consideration be given to leaving the 1.55 acre portion under the existing Medium Density Designation with the provision that the site be studied with the northerly parcels in the next General Plan Amendment Y. ENYIROMffNT—AL A ssH MT: The Initial Study has been completed and staff as rev ewe nr ronmental Checklist, Part I1 of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed Amendment and District change. It is anticipated that the issue of vehicular access can be successfully mitigated at the project level. VI. FACTS FOR FINUINGS: Should the Commission upon examination of the General plan Amellament and Development District Amendment, decide that the change would promote the land use gals and purposes of the General Plan and would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the following findings are necessary for approval: 0 �/ 4, t PL6ING CONNISSIO GPA 86 -038 & DDA 8 September 24, 1986 Page 6 7 REPORT - CLURMAN COMPANY A. The Amendments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; B. The Amendments do promote the gals of the Lane Use Element; and C. The Amendments would be materially injurious or detrimentcl to adjacent properties. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The 171- ail -R oF— newspaper, the property po,ted, and notices sent to atTT proper owners within 3DO feet of the project site. Staff has reviewed a letter of general opposition to the proposed change from The Garden Apartments Homesowners Association (attached). In the letter, the association suggests that Office uses would be a preferred alternative to Neighborhood Commercial uses. VIII. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommendations are noted below: o Parcel 1: Approve Amendments from Medium Residential to acres) Neighborhood Commercial. o Parcel 2: Retain existing Medium Residential designations T17.76 acres) o Parcel 3: Retain existing Medium Residential designation at this acres) point, and provide staff with direction for possible consideration during the next General Plan cycle. If the Commission concurs with this recommendation, adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council of the Gemral Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment and issuance of a Negative Ceclaratlen would be appropriate. Re tfully s fitted, B Bul er City Planar OK:AN:ko Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Viciiity Land Use Mop Exhibit 'B' - Development Site Plan Exhibit 'C' - General Plan Land Use Alternatives Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment em y RESOLUrION NO. 86-147 A ` A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C"ISSION OF Th'E CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN 86 -038. THE CLURMAN COMPANY. REQUESTING U1 Nli 41WT 10 THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GERMAL PLAN FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIOENTIAL (4 -14 OU /ACi TO MEIGHIWAOD COMMERCIAL FOR 10.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE MORTIKST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND MAVEN AVENUE - APN 201 - 263 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43 WHEREAS, the Planning Coaeeission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comaents on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. P.6 -038. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning COW33ion cannot make the following'findTF A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use tv Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or ., detrimental to the adiacent properties. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Coeaission does hereby recommend dental of General Plan Amendment No.86 -038. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1486. P INS COMMISS&OFTKCITY CHO CUCAMORGA BY• en n s ATTEST• —_. — �^ Fin'" t' i= '�- �a".ti+4L�a�,'•'�A:'.h+:nt.1_ ��:. :.a. � -• �flhT�i ; t r• , ' ��P .e— •,l ^ls�.k 4ti C;�iSe' n- rif,�` r:J. F: =� r'' e - i wr Y q�... r„Ji`.S ��F)�L"� PLANNING COMISSION R 'LUTION NO. GPA 86 -038 - DENIAL - •...URMAM September 24, 1986 Page 2 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify Viat toe foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and &Jopted by the P14nning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a re9u /ar meating.of the Planning Cammi•sion held on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOME .: mil:'!`; : _- .,4`"F -1�� • i ,�y ��aPYE• 4 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -148 A RESOLUTION IF Tic RANCHO CUCANONGA PumimG coNNIS5I0N RECONEWING DENIAL OF OEYELOPIENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 86-03 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM (M) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (WC) FOR 10.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST COHNEX OF HIGHLAIA AVENUE AND HAM AVENUE - APR 201- 262 -20, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43 WHEREAS, on the 17th d►y of duly, 1906 an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1906, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65654 of the California Goverment Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission cannot make the following frn-din9i: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terra of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby recommen s n a e Development District Amandeent 06-03. APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1%6. P V ONISSION IF THE CITY OF R.WCH 1 CUCNMOHW a- BY: A/M� s PLANNING COMMISSION ",';MUTION NO. DOA 86 -03 - DENIAL - .UM - Septenber•24, 1986 Page 2 „ �s } I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of +r Rancho Cucamonga, do hareby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by thePlannini ng Comission of the , City of Rancho Cucawnga, at a regular meting of tM Planng Comission held. on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, HCNIEL, DARKER, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE , 1 ,7 r i. �9 c M. r A ■ S GENERAL PLAN MAP DESI,NA7IONS DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP C17f or ITEM - RANI Cxo CUCAINIONGA -nTLI PLANNING DIVISION LCIII V• V No lm i 4 c I BY , u y i I S Low -.400 R-15. MED. RE3. 4 -Q O(/Y /AG. Q -Af OuJ�AlRE I I 1 � , !J/iYGtP FAN. A7E3. LEMON AVE \ Low 5. O lags i I 2.4 Ca /AG. � - . A. L/, zw caw. . TR 9402. ORANGE Y/K. p VAC. (COATHCRCA4L) MB 155 I OEV.O/ f• NC /41.44 u o' THE CAROCN APTS W*. a ff _ MA11B /BI 62 ./,f /✓(tly GRIST AprS. CUY/T pEV.O/3f. VAL� i R S M OfY•dfT FI 4 3 AT BSs � - 'N ` • +• • 5 B,T.ECS SITE- SOMERSET HEO..PEf. 4 -14 ue 175 _ W "CARES. Otl S FE.e Ad. I /4 }47T•I — T. W 4 -/4 aUS /iie NC/GN8OA'N0 0 � RLANT [LtaIMlRLNL W C / m W VA(j1VT' a � or_ OE . O/ST. H' i LTA LOMA � LLI:as� ivC _ HIGHLAND AVE. 1 (5900T C 1 o MEAL N`3. \GRiJV6 `` LOaV R65• f- _4 !� VA6AA/TJ /RC. \ 1 VAC. 1 OEV. O /sT. L' M•p/57 VACANT L/ . INC" AV SNI'L[e g F /GY I i x". N -- c MB I32/; 90.92 'a m SITE PLAN GENERAL PCRIv LAND U36 CITY Or rm�'6Ietp.4 f&-o33. ARA W-o3 ' 4 RA\CHO CUGC NMO \'GA T=. PLANNING DIVOON ECHIMTI_!SG�LD tl I €t€ �f � � Y t � 'Y ��I t fn gSqgggg$�� tl I €t€ �f J � ! ice• ,wK i CITY Or �'., .er y ;.. Ai\CHO CUCAQMO \GA .' Tn e R in A U�4y PUNNING (� �K� `, nT ��(/' �+ �tff� ll..l�{VIV��V LJI`T(���.Y E`II�{p.ri�$V, D s � � Y t � 'Y J � ! ice• ,wK i CITY Or �'., .er y ;.. Ai\CHO CUCAQMO \GA .' Tn e R in A U�4y PUNNING (� �K� `, nT ��(/' �+ �tff� ll..l�{VIV��V LJI`T(���.Y E`II�{p.ri�$V, D s . U40 eu Ltw✓ A.rwv 6µ.A. el"m µalts `i+rv.r,jr Sruor Ajru far iAwo ast caorAyveA"AfS AJ" soar I �xisG'n, I M •j ■ /.Starer I■ ■ • -■s r . I A � •r / r �.. (Fusurf %iri /M(IY ,P,YN;•.,.,R'ir} .—� i1 rVi1jNLANO �YI.Mt.Y T �IfrN a�a-d q�,yroirCl ■ I Wisri•iAAi.¢r "A' d w3eii v h1lf v'C r vo ,4,Vf^W _ 2a9 .r_ .' TVWS ,5*7-Alov 14".4 I A.✓.44ALfA"r .,w 'CAMP am ' A.an MW A".ftCOrr e r erw.wsrc uc e,4"•c•vri 'CAAI.VA"AT, ai &rWs „a( �f Ls•+e.✓ aww,Yso >• .Ns�vsr,:.�ic rosu.+sas -+I PA rV IC&AA r11DAOV~/ Ai I AWL ~JW C* �A 49W C.AL .v.tc4r4a is &r /esAa: �k Accrat:u.►r�.� u...ci.t�u�rs arowr /AV.A f&JYVJCdr 07041,OAL4e' i1A.✓.dkc41i.++swrr ti erees. I �I ol &rA llOvr Ci� c ..AND UJ6.4zZieOW. Ikle -' Ltw✓ Ar�■.wr eawM i IAf fA tit u■aouuuaoouuw■ iv.✓At+�lw[tsraN c.tw/O &AVA'W TW49 a mte AWtY1 •NJ 11AVArAl CCA4AIAIS exladin, '. M �i' I ,«......v.�.,inw.re ■ ■ .. ,..Gtnv...« cwAoy4rc ■ ' /brrdr.MC A+A vAcocc AMWA. �JS iscsuct.st+ )" L7r s[K I ' aaer+ci epa. �t %7wir .�t���• I I J.�/ A. Jraa7r�wr ljs,i,�wrsc i /5✓,� C.a[.w. �' ff�../.Q�esvo�Arsrvr 3.70 ■cpe I I G�rstt. t , c� 'A . AIL i� i1NTRODUCTION iBackground The owners of the property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Highland and Haven Avenues are planning a commercial idevelopment for their property. Since the property's current land -use designation is for high- d *naity residential, according to Rancho iCucamonga's General Plan, the property owners are requesting a general iplan change for their property to a commercial land -use. Specifically, the parcel or property originally consisted of a total of sose 10.5 iacres. However, due to the proposed Foothill Freeway, a frontage road s• will traverse the property, eo its size has been reduced to some 8 iusable acres. The properties surrounding the subject parcel have a ivariety of lend -uses: There is a community shopping center to the *eat of the subject site that is being developed presently; however, its .,L acreage was reduced by five acres due to Foothill Freeway. To the west and north of the Site are *xlating high - density residential projects, Lsuch as apartments and condominiums. Accordingly, there is also Some r- L neighborhood oommeraisl to the north of the site. Finally, most of the other undeveloped property In the general vicinity of the site has j L residential land -use designations. The proposed project is hereafter referred to as the Highland -Haven Commercial Project. x,LFor additional Information on the location of the Highland -Haven ,. Commeroial Project and its surrounding land -uses, refer to Map A. i4 a�;/ tmnsrr *� ■ k;f Credentials and Qualifications of Empire Economics r To comply with the requirements of the Planning Department, the 1 property ownars are having an economic feasibility study of their proposed commercial development conduoted by Empire Economic, a firm specializing in performing such studies. Empire Economics has conducted market demand studies for residential, commercial cod industrial projects located throughout Southern California and San j Bernardino County, in general, as well as the city of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 in particular. Some of the studies that Espird Economics has conducted I recently include Chino Hills, the Ontario International Airport, and the Tri -City Corporate Center. Additionally, Empire Economics has also conducted Market Demand Studies for Rancho Cucamonga's Mortgage Revenue t Bond Programs. Consequently, Empire Economics will utilize its Iknowledge of the economic conditions in the Rancho Cucamonga area to assess the viability of the proposed Highland -Haven Commercial Project. Components of the Market Demand Study LThe Market Demand Study ocaduoted by Empire Economics utilizes a f forecasting - simulation economic - commercial model to analyze the market I., demand and supply conditions for the retail commercial projects within the relevant market and trade areas. The model integrates basical:y two kinds of information: general eeanomio /financial cenoepts underlying real estate development; and specific demographic and I economic factors affecting the designated market areas. Specifically, �YL the primary components of the forecasting - simulation economic commercial model are as follows: Page 2 r yN of 6' t - a r r �Y s P •L r1'Lx: I. The Existing and Expected Population Growth in the Market and Trade Areas Demographic, Employment and Construction Activity: Recent Trends and Patterns Populatton Forecasts for the Market Region Population and Household Forecasts for the Trade Areas II. The Potential Demand for Retail Products in the Trade Areas Gross Purchasing Power in the Trade Areas Potential Purchasing ?over for Various Retail Products Potential Leasable Space and Retail Outlets for the Various Retail Products III. Market Supply Conditions for Commercial Retail Establishments Recent Retail Sales Activity Comparable Commercial Projects in the Prime Trade Area Competitiveness and Capture Rates for the Highland -Haven Commercial Project IV. The Optimal Product Types and their Absorption Rates for the Highland -Haven Commercial Project Potential Market Gaps for Retail Outlets Optimal Product Types for the Candidate Project Conclusions Thus, the market demand study systematically proceeds from the general demographic, economic and financial market conditions to the optimal product types for the subject site and their expected absorption achadules. , Major Assumptions and Qualifications The Market Absorption Study was conducted within the context of various assumptions and qualifications; accordingly, these are nova- " presented. = Page 3 r 4 1. Ecocosio Conditions The population and retail. forecasts are based upon the most probabls intermediate and long term econr 'i and financial market conditions for the Highland -Haven Commercial Project. Accordingly, the projections represent the underlying economic - financial conditions over the typical business /real estate cycles. Such projections are appropriate for projects such as commercial retail establishments, since they represent long -term commitments, ' 2. Preduction of the Commercial Products IThe property owners /developers for the Highland -Haven Commercial Project are expected to produce the optimal commercial products ` for the candidate parcel with appropriate characteristics and competitive rents so that the commercial products required to Y I satisfy the demand projections are available in a timely manner. The assumption reflects the responsiveness of the developers /builders to the expected market conditions. 'L Thus, the conclusions of this i. Lassumptions and qualifications L study are subject to the above Market and Trade Areas LBased upon a consideration of the demographic and economic market r. factors that will influence the success of the proposed commercial .'•� project, the ,following market and trade areas have been delineated: t Market Areas The relevant market areas are as follows: =° Page 4 ' ' s Los Angeles Metropolitan Area: This encompaasea the Southern .•' 1 California economy, includipg Loa Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, .'�. Riverside, San Diego, and Ventura counties. Whila most of the u demographic, economic, and construction activity was originally ( concentrated in Loa Angeles County, there h.s been a substantial _ spillover of such activity to the other eointies, such as San Bernardino County, during the past decade. e• t p t San Bernardino County: This includes all of the various cities N .t and communities within its boundaries. Regional Markets: San Bernardino County is partitioned into various regions, according to their particular demographic and 4 economic characteristics, as follows: IWest Region: Rancho Cucamonga, Montclair, Chino, t � Upland and Ontario East Region: Fontana, Rialto, Colton, Loma Linda San Bernardino, Grand terrace, Redlands, Highlands, and Yucaipa +. Desert Region: Hesperia, victorville, AU_lanto and Barstow For adlltional information on the boundaries of the market areas, refer L( to Map B. Trade Areas The trade areas represent the households that are expectad ,o use the 3 retail establishments at the commercial site. There are three trade L f 1•U areas to consider: primary, secondary and tertaary. The: spenifio w � +.0 boundaries cf these are based upon the amount of time repuired••tor,,' $. ` households to travel from their naidenwa to the subJeot. site; � Page 5 ��'�' =i �Fi`fe .L`: -' .�'4.. r�tt 4'' „t •`a' •.�a1�F , ti'ft`n aeditionally, the loo .ions of competing, commert.al centers are also taken into consideration. These trade areas are first defined i according to the distance faotor alone; then, refinements are made later, based upon the locations of competing retail centers. F Primary Trade Area: This includes the households that are Su the j immediate vioinity of the aubjact site, and so they will regard 1 the retail outlets on the subject parcel as their primary shopping Y ± opportunity !„r the products that it offers. Geographically, this 1 includes moat of Census Tract /20. Secondary Trade Area: This encompasses the households that will consider shopping at the retail outlets located on the s:eject 1 site but they will also have several other competitive sites to choose from as well. This area covers the entire city of Rancho �I Cucamonga. •r, .e Tertiary Trade Area: This covers all of the households that may , come into contact with the retail outlets on the candidate parcel, and so they may shop there from time to time. From a geographical 3' perspective, this area covers the city of Rancho Cucamonga as well as its environs. , I For information on the specific boundaries of the various trade areas. L refer to Map C. gl c :•' Pago 6 » r _. tL Note I' 'r To facilitate your review of the study, the tables, charts, exhibits, graphs and maps eelevant to each section have been placed at f the end of that section. Statistics used in the text have been rounded off ti make the study more readable. For precise information, refer to the appropriate tables. r _. tL y_ �7 r v • Page 7 0 f y_ �7 r v • Page 7 0 1'I I i il,� ill 1111, •.•. �'� ;I.1 I'I'1'1'1 I' �1'I � +.� I •11 111 `J• yam. C'' Yi'I'I'I'I'I'1 �'�', Ij 1�I�I ; ;••�.,. .; L ....... ... ... y,1 V III .•1 1 1 1 :::::::•:••••. y 11�lllllll Il1l I'1l.l 111 .,. •., ....:........ is � �a,lllll I111111�1111111111i i iiJ ::: 1 , iEi::• „ �. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 aryl •� �+I U a 111111 T . 11111111111111 •.•• I'I I I I 1 I' •'� 1'1'1'1'1'1' I'1'1' 1.1111 4 X11111 11111 11111111: X 1 1 1 1.1.1'1'1'1'1'11 11111 1 1 1 1 I l' 111 111'1' r ■ ■■ ::: ■■■. :::: • '�■ 1�1�1�1�1� ::: . '• ii ".i S%• ........ .... ................. 1 I'I'I'I' ..........:......... ..Ji ......... .. .... III 1 I ..................... ♦y ::: : ::: OU 1• 1 ' 'I 1 a� � C 't:r•.: � I'�' 11. S f.� V I 111.11 �•:.• J . J 11111111 •.... -. 23 � W i M L L :L L .L 3 SECTION Iv THE OPTIMAL PRODUCT TYPES FOR THE HIGHLAND -HAVEN COMMERCIAL PRnJECT AND THEIR ABSORPTION RATES The study now combines the results of the above analysis of the potential and the actual retail sales for the various trade areas alone with the competitiveness of the Hi4hland -Fivan Commercial Project to determine the optimal product types for the site as well as their expected absorption schedule. Potential Market Gave for Retail Outlets A comparison of the potential retail sales and the actual retail sales results in a determination of the market saps for commerclnl retail eutleto in the city of Rancho Cucaeonga. This provides an overview •a to what types of retail outlets are presently most needed An the city: Ratio: 1985 Potential Actual Actual/ S21e3 Sales Potential - - ---- --- - - - - -- ailliona - -- Apparel ................. $18.71 $6.72 35.94% General Merchandise..... $57.02 $10.84 19.01% Drug Stores ............. $9.99 $3.68 36.62% Food Stores ............. 430.10 $43.93 145.93% Liquor Stores ........... $4,64 $3.57 76.99% Eating and Drinking..... $40.35 $28.34 70.24% Home Furnishings........ $18.90 $2.53 13.38% Building Materials...... $27.66 $16.73 60.47% Automotive .............. $93.69 $24.80 26.47% speciality., ............ $43.59 $14.35 32.941 Other ................... $175.42 $97.0)0 54.37% Total .................... $523.08 $253.21 48.41% I i�� R'r. - d' So, for the city as a whole, the actual level of retail Sales amounts to some 49% of its potential level. Consequently, most of the retail n products in Rancho Cucamonga have substanLial market gaps, based upon a comparison of their potential versus theit• actual retail sales. The market gaps that exist presently could increase substantially : during the next five yearn, due to the city's expected population Igrowth. For instance, a comparison of the potential retail sales for - 1990 as compared to the actual level of retail sales for 1985 reveals Ithe following: I Ratio: 1990 Potential Actual Actual/ Sales Sales Potential • I -� millions _-- �_____-_ Apparel ................. $27.96 $6.72 24.05% General Merchandise..... 985.21 $10.84 12.725 Drug stores ............. $1402 $3.68 24.64% > Food Stores ............. $44.95 $43.93 97.65% Liquor Stores........... $6.93 $3.57 51.52% I Eating and Drinking..... $60.29 $28.34 47.00% Home Furnishings........ $28.24 $2.53 8.96% Building Materials...... $41,34 $16.71 40.47% Automotive .............. $140.00 $24.80 17.71% Speciality .............. $65.14 $14.36 22.04% �• Other ................... $266.61 $97.00 36.38% ' L Total .................... $781.63 $253.21 32.40% LSo, for Rancho Cucamonga as a whole, the actual level of retail sales would amount to only 32% Of its potential sales, if there were no Lretail establishments built during the next five years. Thus, the Lretail products in Rancho Cucamonga have even greater market gaps, based upon a comparison of their potential 1990 sales to their actual retail sales for 1985. Consequently, the amount of new commercial development during the next two years must be sufficient to accomplish *ry L two objectives: First, to fill the market gaps that existed me of 1985. Seeondly, to meet the additional demand for retail products by the Page 27 L Y r 1 L rL 1. IL 5 population growth during the 1985 -90 time period. For additional information on the retail market gaps, refer to Table 20 and Graph 20. Optimal Product Types for the Highland -Haven Commercial Project The optimal product types for Highland -Haven Commercial Project can now be identified. Specifically, this is accomplished using the following algorithm. First, the retail product types for which there is presently a market gap are identified. Second, for each of these, the competitiveness of Highland -Haven Commercial Project is considered. So, a retail outlet is considered to be optimal if it fulfills both of these criteria. Minimum Criteria.. Apparel ................. General Marchand130..... Drug Stores ............. Toca Stores .......... ... Liquor Stores........... Eating and Drinking..... Home Furnishings........ Bu3ldiMS Materials...... Autcmotive..ji.. ...... .. Speciality ........... .. Other ................... City Competitive Optimal Need Site Products -- - - -"- TS- .00S -- - ---- 5 - --- - - - - -- Yea No No Yes No No Yea p0 No No Yea No No Yea No Tea Yes Yes\ Yea Yes Yea US Yes Yea Yea Yee yes Yes Yes Yea Yes Yes Yes Therefore, the subject site is suitable for the product types that are designated *yes* For additional information on the specific retail outlets for each of the above categories, rarer to Chart A. _, ��� Page 28 • �: v v C s' Abeorpt n Time for the Optimal M, 11 Outlata ? i= The absorptina of the optimal product types for the Highland -Haven Commercial Project is expected to occur in a timely manner since the selection of these product types fulfilled two key deslgnation:Firat, there are substantial market gaps for these product types in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Secondly, the Highland -Haven Commercial Project ' has a site which is competitive with other comparable Bites. Thus, it is reasonable that the optimal products could be absorbed during the next two -three years. I Conclusions e I Therefore, Empire Economics, based upon a comprehensive analysis of the market demand and supply aonditions for commercial retail Outlets in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, along with the locational and other ° attributes of the candidate parcel, has concluded that the Highland -Haven Commercial Project is appropri,to for commercial development. The primary factors underlying this conclusion arc as follows: v • There is presently a substantial market gap for retail development in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, as a whole, and in the Primary . I Trade Area for Highland -Haven Commercial Project, in particular. 4- This market gap is expected to increase substantially, especially f I in the Primary Trade Area, as its population grows at a rapid rate during the 1985 -90 time period. Thus, commercial davelopment in Lthe city of Rancho Cucamonga muab grow at a very fast rate to,, ? ;•, approach or attain an equilibrium condition by 1990. ��c� Page 29 i v It s. I 3 6, I s � Ia i i I I n .. I t 3 k. r L tF L a Based upon these market gaps for retail products, the optimal retail outlets for Highland -Haven Commerc!.al Project have been identified, based upon its location and competitivenss in the market place. Additionally, these retail products can be absorbed within a reasonable time period of some two -three yearn. I The proposed Foothill Frcaway will have several significant Impact* upon Highland -Haven Commercial Project. First, the project will be adjacent to the freeway, and there will be an off -ramp at Haven Avenue, which is, of course, next to the site. Secondly, a community shopping canter that is directly across Haven Avenue has had its acreage reduced substantially, due to the route of the Foothill Freeway. Consequently, the demand for commercial establishments that would have been devwloped on that property will shift to the subject site, due to its proximity. e Finally, as a result of the proposed route for the Foothill Freeway, the subject property has been split into two sections, and a major thoroughfare now traverses the parcel. Consequently, from a public safety perspective, it appears that a commercial development would be more appropriate than a residential project, due to the expected traffic conditions, - Joseph T. Jancxyk Evans, Ph.D. J� � � �� i_.�33��•NY'�yyW� •... �, / rage 30 �A�:.Rht —'�'i S.. �•: 3kT- 'fvra�L �. e�.l��Ma: eC ._ u'.S; °ttt��i d _j II l l rl. l 3. t. U I k l- I � f r3 � !i a � a i I i I Vie: r ,,,;z: • =:, = ix� A'� = -i- mix- .:ri- �x-� - -- cis•- ��- �__x__�- t EEf iE56E= EEf !lFEEEbg�_EE3iE =EEft1!<Etaec�ar f' e fEEEEE£ aEEf1SEEfi *iEEEEEf5EE5EEiftFea_ ;af; c; �tsscas; a�aaess :n�ii : *_as�ss�x :acixsocA =aixr;iagc :aai :xgr�gcca assxiacascA� -x�- s iisici: AisrisiAnd sag _AfiACaiiittwc =�ASar�si�c taaa: =lass ; :�a4sassssscRaaas�aggss{cqi�ccs sisii Elsa xccsis _- II = =��g_saac�aaagiigaags� axaas asa& s gigc84ajsasqe :ss_sesae;a =qas := saiidgi=si» ais =-_,gc mass isiiii�ii_pzi_:.iaa IS 1111ill Atli r 4 l i t I {k DRAFT EXCERPT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-038 - CLURMAN - A Density Residential (4-14 du /ac) to Neighborhood Commercial for 10.7 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Haven and Highland - APN 201- 262-28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43. ENYIROIPIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AIENOIENT 86.03 - repas Development s r p rem 'NC' for 10.7 acres of land, located at the northwst corner of Haven and Highland - APN 201- 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 3), 40, 42, 43. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Jim Wood, 6615 E. Pacific Cast Highway, Suite 215, Long Beach, California, gave an overview of the repast. He advised that the applicant had met with the Garden Apartment Homeowners' Association. In an effort to mitigate their concerns, be suggested parcel 2 be left as commercial with some type of restricted use. He additionally outlined mitigation measures Mich could be taken on their proposed site plan and indicated a willingness to work with the City. Commissioner Barker stated that tha applicant appears to be atterpting to condition mitigation measures on design elamentf as part of the land use c4ange and asked counsel's direction. Ralph Hanson. Deputy City Attorney, advised that this application 1s for land use approval Ind there could be no conditioning of a particular design at the General Plan stage. Comissioner Wiflal asked If the applicant would be willing to consider an Office Professional designation for parcel 2. Mr. Wood indicated that be would be willing to consider such a designation. Craig Justice, 6330 Haven Avenue, representing the Garden Apartment Homeowners' Association, staged that the quality of the apartments is not consistent with commercial development. He stated a concern with comearcial development on parcel one primly due to the view Mich would be presented to the apartment owners who face that parcel. He concurred with staff's recommendation that parcel 2 remain Medium Residential, and suggested that percel 3 be carefully analyzed and be designated Office Professional or remain residential. He additionally stated a concern for tb 'viability of this center due to the proximity of the Lucky shopping chntar currently under construction. He pointed out that the proposed intersection of Alta Loma ,g RESOLUTION NO.? 7 -Q (,;L q 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO x CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DENYING ENVIROKENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AIENDMENi W. 86 -03B, THE CLURNAN COMPANY REQUESTING AN AlEIDMEM., TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL RANCHO OU/AC)GENERAL O EIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 10.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE - AFN 102- 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43. Y WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public bearing on September 24, 1986 to consider all comments cn the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86 -038; and WHEREAS, the City Council Held a duly advertised public hearing at consider all cawents on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86 -03B; Section I- T12 Rancho Cucamonga City Ccuncil cannot make the following Tidn ing: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. NOM, TEEREFERE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby denies General Plan Amendment No. 86 -038. a' A 6 .ti ri v _ v • lYS'`•hMt + RESOLUTION NO. 7 -0(03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,•,OEMYING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 86 -03, THE CLUtMAN COMPANY, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM (M) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) FOR 10.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT-THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLtJO AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE - APN 201 - 262 -28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43. WHEREAS, on the 11th day of July, 1986 an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Planning Commission hel-' a lily advertised public hearing pursuant to Sectiop 65854 of the California government Code; cnd WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Development District Amendment No. 86 -03; SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council cannot make the following Mdirgs: 1. That the .abject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed, district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment no: the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby denies Development District Amendment No. 86 -03. -.y ILUU�.;;rr �7jr %.�._a M-�.� �.•i 4�a, '. x,_.- �w� '- .7..JP9�`,�i e'���', f } A"IOAVIT OF PUKICATIOH STATE OF CALIFORWIA u COU"YN OF SAN BERNARDINO f Maurine D. Pagan do bereby certify that I am the Legal Advertising ckrk of THE DAILY REPORT, a daily newspaper of general circidatkn, publimbod In the Ci ty of Ontario, County and State afor.Yald and the ttits attached adynitu rent cf Notice of Public Hearing City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga aast published In said newspeper One t 1 f time to wit: January 22. 1987 I certify under penally of perjury that the forgpoft Is Uue alai correct 3 're] at Ontario. Caltfarnia thin is n d day of Janua.,, 1 r w tlw- s / I DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 1. nn n • Mnv^ Mtn ♦ irnwta A STAFF REPORT February 4, 1987 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner Cynthia Kinser, Assistant Planner F.ENERAL PLAN AIB?NDIENT 86 -02A - BAAMAKIAN - A REQUEST TO WW`TFX'VW USE MAP OF IHE FROM LOW- MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS /ACPE) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR APPROXIMATELY 5 ACRES OF LAID. LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE - APN: 227- 111 -24. 25, AND 26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN 7Y0 EAT--BS'QI— 0004MITY SERVICE) AND IN (LOW - INDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO WC (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) FOR 9.4 ACRES OF LIVID LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND ETIWANOA AVENUE - APH: 227- 111-10, 24, 25, AND 26. I. RECOMMENDATION Staff recooends that the City Council affirm the findings of the Planning Cnmis +ion and recommends denial of the General Plan and Ettwanda Specific P':n Amendments. If the City Cnuncil concurs, adoption of the attacned Resolution of Denial would be approptldte. I1. BACKER04ND: At the July 16, 1986 City Council mating, an application was considered for a General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plcn Amendment for a 9.4 acre site located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda and Baseline. The Planning C."I vion had recommended denial of them proposed action at its MV 28, 1966 meeting. At the City Council meeting, the applications wen continued at the request of the applicant pending the completion of a traffic study on the proposed project. In the later part of 1986, a traffic study was completed by a City - appointed traffic consultant which analyzed the potential effects of the proposed land use change. d'7 % CITY MNCIL STAFF REPORT. GENERAL PLAN AIiENDNENT 86 -02A ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN 1WENDIENT 86 -01 Page 2 This report will focus on the findings of the traffic report and implications to the initial analysis of the proposal. Other issues which the Planning Commission believes are very significant in their recommendation such as land use cempatibility, Ettwands Specific lanning Commission Report conformance, , etc. 28. a are contained In the attached III. TRAFFIC STWY ANALYSIS The Traffic Report was prepared to assess the tapact of ci:anging the subject site to Neighborhood Commercial as compared with other logical land use alternatives. Tile alternatives included studied the relationship of a nearby existing neighbor commercial site in Victoria with the site requested for change. The report analyzed four (4) land use configurations es follows: ALTERNATIVE ONE provides for tSe Barvakian Site (Site I) to to a combination of residential ,and community oriented commercial - shopping area. The victoria Site (Site 2) is provided as a neighborhord commercial shopping center (existing land use designations). ALTERNATIVE TNO proviaos for the Barmakian Site to be a neighborhood commerclai shopping center (as requested). The Victoria Site is to be used as residential development. ALTERNATIVE THREE provides for both the 9armakian Site (as requested) and the Victoria Site to be used as neighborhood cemercial shopping centers. ALTERNATIVE FOUR provides for the Barsekfan Site to be residential development. ite victoria Site is to be developed into a netghborhaw commercial shopping center. Each of the four alternatives were tested in the traffic model analysis process in order to determine the impact of each alternativv and the traffic impact of each Site within each alternative. The resulting alternatives cover all combinations of land use which could reasonably occur. In particular the traffic impact analysis examined the effect of the alternate Sand uses on the streets and intersections adjacent to the commercial sites, the driveways into :.1e sites and at selected intersections elsewhere in Etiwanda. f. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -02A Ef1NANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -01 Page 3 Each of the alternatives was tested within improved transportation network and each alternative developed more traffic than the network capacity at level of service of 'C' or better. The one condition which is consistent in all of the alternatives is the retention of Etiwanda Avenue as a two lane facility. This is in accord with the currently approved planning for the area. The conclusions of the traffic consultant are as follows: 'From the traffic standpoint, there is no clear cut alternative that is greatly superior to all the others, except that Alternative One (existing plans) provides better traffic service an Etiwanda Avenue at the site driveway and at the Baseline Road intersection. The comparison of the service levels are provided in Table 1, in the enclosed report.' According to the City Traffic Engineer, the report shows that retaining the existing planned land uses provides the best service on Etitmnda Avenue at site driveways and at the Ettwanda /Baseline intersection. It is evident that an increase in the intensity of use at the earmmktan site will decrease levels of service at the Ettwnda /Baseline intersection fret 'C' to 'D' (see attached Table 2) and will have a significant effect on Etiwanda Avenue immediately north of Baseline. While that is understood that Etiwanda Avenue vAll require additional lanes immediately at the intersection with Baseline, in any case, the proposed development would require such widening of Etiwanda to be carried farther north. These results represent conditions at build -out of the victoria and Etiwanda Plans. Immediate effects of commercial developee t site would be ouch reduced. An Executive Summary of the traffic stcdy Is included with a table •level of service interpretation' which describes the conwitions of operation for various levels of service. III. CONCLUSIONS At its meting of May 28, 1986, the Planning Commiscioo concluded r • that the request represented a significant departure from the " intent of the Ettwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan as evidenced by: ■ V,r, CITY COON L STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN ANE MD(T 86 -02A ETIVANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AIENOIENT 86 -01 Page 4 y F' 6S� Y, w a. An inconsistency of the proposed land use change with the goals of the Specific Plan, and b. A concern that additional traffic generation would result from increased commercial intensity, and C. That the proposed shopping center would be within a quarter mile of a planned shopping center- site within the Victoria Planned Corm unity. Staff believes the study confirms the Planning Commission traffic concerns for the project and reinforces their findings of inconsistency with the General Plan a.d Etlwnda Specific Plan. Staff recommends dental, horever, if the City Council wishes to approve the application as submitted, staff would like Council direction repardinyy its wisW on the Victoria Neighborhood Commercial Site. If the Barmakian amendment Is approved should the victoria Site remain Commercial or should staff initiate a general plan study to lunge its land use designation? ResD ctfully ted l /Bra Bu 1 City Planner BB:AN:te Attachments: Execitive Summary of the Etiwnda Area Traffic Study, Alternative Analysis Figure 2 of Etiwanda Traffic Study Tables 1 and 2 of Etlwanda Traffic Study Plannlny Commission Staff Report of May 28, 1986 Resolutions of Dental Planning Commission Resolution 86 -68 Planning Commission Resolution 86 -69 City Council Report of July 2, 1986 i .a a, n a� ,• rr'rnn ®Y'�L 106 LAr7 THIRD SMUT . MU 7140944217 . LAN e9aNM01NO, CAUFOxNIA 92410 November 22. 1986 CIVIL INGINLLAINe , SURVIVING City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Mr. Paul Rougeou RI: Etiwanda Traffic Traffic Engineer Study Contract Dear Sr. Rougeau: The enclosed report presents the results of the recently completed analyses for the Etiwanda Area. The following parts of this letter provide an Executive Summary of the results of theme analyses. EIICUTIVI SUMMARY Each of the alternatives was tested with an improved transportation network, and each alternative developed more traffic than the network capacity at level of service "C" or better. The one condition which in consistent in all of the alternatives is the retention of Itiwanda Avenue as a two -lace facility. This in in accord with the currently ■pproved planning for the area. From the traffic standpoint, there is no clear cut alternative that is greatly superior to all the others, except that Alternative One (existing plans) provides batter traffic service on Itiwanda Avenue at the site driveway and at the Baseline Road intersection. The comparisons of the service levels ere provided in Table 1, in the enclosed report. The two prevailing conditions in each alternative are: 1) the section of Itiwanda Avenue serving Site One and 2) the section of Victoria Park Lane serving Site Two and further north. In each alternative, the restricted width of Rtiwanda Avenue (2 -lanes) is inadequate for the projected traffic, with additional capacity required (see Table 1) to provide an acceptable level of traffic service. The daily traffic on Victoria Park Lane is high in each alternative (see report Tigures 3, 4, B, and 6) due to the proposed commercial area to the south. With Alternatives One and Three, the left turn capacity is inadequate (sea report Table 1) with the proposed cross- section of Victoria Park Lana. The Dark -lika entrance north from Baseline should be re- examined in order to develop the additional capacity. D6_3 6 a`. ZIZCUTIYZ SUMMARY November 22, 1988 Page Two oce caution in evaluating the study results must be pointed out. The comparisons in report Table 1 must be carefully observed. As previously cited and footnoted in report Table 1, some of the service levels indicate failure of the capacity measure for left turne. Consequently, it may be desirable to plan for special street sections in this area to accoasodate the projected traffic. Please advise us if there are any questions or if we can be of further service to the City. Siare/ ` rJely,,� n Clyde SweetA. 1.,T.1. Manager - Transportation Division Raclosure � a J- IM a 1 r S.� Figure 2 1 I ANALYSIS INTERSECTION LOCATIONS 1 ;-1 1 .1 �1 =�l r_ r•�x .�I �.4 L( ! WI wacm4c mror sms `.r. � wruaen"& SS TABLE 1 ALTBRNlTIYE ANALYSIS RESULTS INURSECTION ALTERNATIVE STA TWO THREE YOUR L41_ig la: v%s tai 103 Vic -Its Etiwrnda Avenue and Victoria C .75 C .77 D .81 C Avenue (3) .73 East Avenue and Victoria Avenue D .81 D .83 D .84 C .80 [3) Victoria Park Lane and Site 2 (Mimay a D 88 C .78 D .88 C .78 v,darla Park Law) (2) (2) Etiwanda Avenue and Sire 1 (Edwauda lflmayl D .86 E .97 E .98 B .95 (2l (2) (2) (2) Victoria Pv k Lane and Baseline Road D .82 0 .61 D .83 D .82 (3) Etiwaada Avenue and Baseline Bond C .70 C .80 D .82 D .81 ' (3) Site 2 and Baseline Road (lesellee kinen) A .68 A .54 A .66 A .68 Site 1 and Baseline Road (lesellu Irinnl) A <.51 A <.54 A C.54 A <.64 n3 `n < a v/c ratio is less than 0.54. [1J a See Table 2 for level of service explanation. [2) a Capacity of left turn is exceeded and an additional turn lave is needed but cannot be provided. - [3) a Initial study intersection. _7_ a5z- :1 rq) . 1 ,. TAILS 2 LLVYL 0? 322VICE INURPRITATION Averlp Vehicle Volume to Level of Pally ctoeclt9 Urylet Dauristlm SSx91ds) Ratio A Frn Floe. Yo ampr"cY Flue Is folly 00.0.01 0.00.0.59 Utilized by traffic Ind w vehicle wits h+alr them w red Ind!ut!oa. Issil- offic"t 611113. 1 Stable OWltita. As occasional eaprllth 05.1-15 DA".69 ehau Is folly utilised. May drivers lesie to fall suembet restri0td of Wm platlsl3 of vehlcles. Ild"I dellys. C $4610 OWILk". aJmr Wto %d r`1ue i.! 1 -25 1.70-0.79 oay bocttw fully otillt .. dent driv= - fall seuehat restrictd. kcptehly delays. Awmil" attle. Drivers y here 75.1-10 0.I01.19 to wit tka9hw0 "w rd 319"1 Ildicatill. lows de "IG bit dissipate �f rapidly, mltbeat ucessial delays. i E 0mstehla *Wallis. Volues at " mw 10.1 -S41 0.90.0.99 capacity. VA!cln may *all thrwAk samal sionll cycles. Leal 11rw1 iorm urstrlea from Intersection. Mpiffcut •F delays. F Fercd Flat. Awaleseab Jawd condltins. 60.1 or "t latirseatlon west" beta capacity viO vaster applicable it lot "Isles. 0"fues w block arstrois imterslcti0as. Elcessin delays. TJ x'w sl^ !1VSL1 'Ni91wy C"IClti Naw11.' Ni9Yw1 MuYCY turd. Sp1u111 Papaya M. II, VaehlMtom, I.C., M. '11eh141 Capacity Raul' SWIM bpwt 709, TreasWbtton Nesmd lard, "t"tom, D.C.. Armt. 1915. ��feY rq) . 1 ,. ;a. W` D i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 28, 1g86 TO: Chaiman and Members of the claming Commission FROM: Brad Biller, City Planner BY. Lisa Yiningcr, Assistant Planner Wn SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAY AMENDMENT 86 -02A BAR WCIAN - A request to amend the Land Use Map of the enera an from Low Medium Density Residential (4-8 du /ac) to Neighborhood Commercial for approximately five acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda - APN: 227 - 111 -24, 25, and 26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWINDA SPECIFIC PLAN ARENUMLAT ae-01 - 9AI MIAR - A request to amend the Et1wanda i c an ram S (Community Service) and LN (Low Medium Density Residential) to MC (Neighborhood me Comrcial) for 9.4 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda - APN: 227- 111 -10, 24, 25, and 26. I. ABSTRACT: The General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan aW moment are requested from Low Medium Density Residential /Community Service to Neighborhood Commercial for a 9.4 acre site located on the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda Avenua. The applicant has stated that it is his intent to develop a neighborhood shopping center. At this meeting, after public input, the Commission will determine if any additional environmental analyyssis will be required or make a determination regarding the a^eideent. I1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has rp;iested a General Plan Amendment Etiwanda Specific Piao Amendment for a 9.4 acre site located on the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda: Under the current Cenral Plan, approximately half of the site•is Lw- Madium Density Residential with the remainder Neighborhood Commercial. Under the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP), the site is designated Community Services with the two small lots in the northeast corner designtmd as Low Medium Density Residential (sea Exhibits W and 064). V a� �J j., =•a� � � s a� 9 t�z g It J ui 3 � \ - _ Y r ---111 A�-i h \ e a 8 '1\• S Z 1 } l7 I, ,. • P sr 2 o Ly A� SZ 5 k �r PLANNING COMMIS, JM STAFF REPORT GPA 86 -OZA and ESPA 86-01 May 28, 1986 Page 2 The Community Services designation in the Etiwanda Plan was created to provide opportunities for limited or specialized low impact commercial and quasi - commercial services in a residential setting, with commercial development not to exceed 40,000 square feet. Site development requires a Conditional Use Permit and master plan, with conditionally approved uses listed as community uses (schools, parks, cnurches, etc.), Low tedium Density Residential and limited Commercial. The request under consideration is for: 1. An amendmot of the General Plan to expan! the Neighborhood CommerI&I designation to the entire site; and 2. An amendment of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to eliminate the Community Services and Low Medium designation and designate the entire site as Neighborhood Commercial. III. GENERAL PLAN /ETIVANOA SPECIFIC PLAN ANENtWKT ANILYSIS: In order to eve u! e this application. it Tnecessary to consider the background of the project site, the Etiwanda Specific Plan adoption process, and consistency with the policies of the ESP and General Plan. A. Background: Prior to the adoption of the Etiwanda Specific Plan in I!M13, numerous hearings were held to receive public input on the content of the plan. The Etiwanda Specific Plan was developed to provide more detailed and site specific guidelines for future development of Etiwanda with the goal of preserving the character of the area, while requiring new development to Incorporate the architectural character consistent with the emwmtty. The Specific Plan provides detailed Implementation measures to order to carry the goals and policies of the General Plan. The Froject site was identified through the public hosing process as particularly sensitive from i planning perspective due to its location on Etiwanda Avenue. The Community Service designation was conceived for this site in order to provide a ^leans for site specific controls. The propeviy owner (who is oIso the applicant for this project) initiated the original proposal. His stated intent at the time the Etiwanda Specific Plan was prepared was to develop a small commercial project, possibly with a specialty market and - other limited kY office /cu'aaerclal space. The remaining portion of the site PLANNING COMMIS. JN STAFF REPORT GPA 86 -02A and ESPA 86.01 May 28, 1986 Page 3 would be developed with Low Medium density residential. The design of this mixed use project was to reinforce the character of Etiwanda by: a) Providing a community focal point b3 Reinforcing a sense of community, C Reinforcing Etiwanda's heritage. The designation of Community Services was approved by the Planning Commission with this express intent and with very specific limitations on the scope of permitted commercial uses. As a practical result of the ESP process, the Genercl Plan was amended prior to final adoption of the ESP. Since no Community Services land use district existed in the General Plan, the closest designations were deemed to be the Low - Medium Residential and NC districts. However, since it is the specific plan whii.h is the implementation vehicle for site development, the stringent Community Service district requirements should receira extensive review In this process. The applicant has requested a General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment in order to develop the entire 9.4 acre site as a shopping center of approximately 94,000 square feet, incorporating 3 supermarket, drug store, tenant spaces, and free standing office, fast food and gas station structures (see Exhibit •C', Site Plan). The applicant has submitted a letter of justification (attached, Exhibit 000) stating that the existing Low Medium Density residential Jesignatlon is less acceptable to area residents than a change from Community Service to Neighborhood Comm3rcial. Staff has not as yet received any comments from the Etiwanda community regarding this issue. B. Land Use C at�1b1114�: The project is bounded on the north west yb the Victoria Planned Coawunity. The areas adjacent to the site are designated as Low Density Residential. Across Ltiwanda Avenue to the east and south across Base Line Road, the designation under the Etiwanda Specific Plan is Low Medium Density Residential. The ESP and General Plan state that the City should encourage oppartunitles to mix different, but compatible, land uses while organizing land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent uses. While the proposed commercial use would not create severe incompatibilities with adjacent single- family , PLANNING COMMISSION .rAFF REPORT GPA 86 -02A and ESPA 86 -01 May 28, 1986 _ Page 4 residential development, the Impact of the expanded commercial area would undoubtedly be more significant than with the existing designation to which a small commercial center would be buffered from the Victoria Development by ring of Low Medium Density residences. The intensity of the proposed land use 1s less compatible with adjacent uses than the existing designation. C. C0- 111;t! cy with Adopted 6aais and Obdectives: The Etiwanda Speciic Plan object ves or caoerc a ve opment can be summarized as an effort to rrevent commercial activity and associated traffic from patting community character, particularly in the core urea on Etiwanda and Victoria Avenues, while providing necessary commercial ep;c:tunities to area residents. The Community Services Dt;trict was established as a residential district which also allows limited or specialized Iw impact commercial services. Neighborhood Coseercial is defined as 'provided to meet the retail and service needs of a cluster of neighborhoods, with a total leasable area from 30,000 to 100,G3O square feat•. The plan notes that neighborhood commercial centers should be located no closer than one mile from one another and should not meourage vehicular traffic in established residential areas or on Etiwanda Avenue. The nearest neighborhood commercial designation to the project site is located approximately one - quarter mile west on Bas3 Line Road in the Victoria Planned Community, Approval of this request would allow two comparable commercial centers within a quarter mile of each other. Another objective of the ESP relates to community identity. One of the main reasons why the plan was developed was to provide a means to preserve the unique characteristics of the area, including the rural environefnt and cultural /historical links to the past. The project site has been desig -isted as f• particularly sensitive to these concerns due to its critical location In the heart of Etiwanda. Development of any project requires special landscape and design treatments of a scale which blends with the surrounding community. The epplica,it has submitted a conceptual site plan and elevations of the review at understanding of the applicants proposal. Nhil elevations indicate an intent on the architect's p employ a style appropriate to the area, the scale structure, particularly the supermarket at 60+ fat appears to be somewhat disproportlonatu with its surroui PLANNING COMMIS JN STAFF REPORT ' GPA 86-C2A and ESPA 86 -01 ` _ May 28, 1986 Page 5 D. Conclusions., The proposed land use change represents a significant departure from the existing land use designation of Community Services, in terns of land use compatibility and consistency with goals and objectives of the ESP and General Plan. In general, the application appears inappropriate for the following reasons: 1. The proposed land use does not meet the intent of the _ Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding limitations on the type of cooercial uses and associated traffic on Etiwanda Avenue, .vxI particularly, rf the project site. 2. The proposed neighborhood commercial center will be located too close to a neighborhood center already designuted on the General Plan and Victoria Community Plan as one quarter mile west of the project site. 3. Land uses would be less 'compatible with adjacent properties if the land use change were approved, Since,the development intensity of the site would be sibstantlally greater. 4. The conceptual site plan and elevations do not svet the intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding' architectual and design elements, especially relating to scale and pedestrian orientation. Based cn the considerations listed above, the General Plan /Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendsent application as subattted does not prcvide a cdequate justification for aw,ding the Etiwands Specific Plan and Genera' Plan. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: The Initial Study prepared by staff Identifies ve areas of concern for potential environmental impact. They are: land use and planning consiAerations; circulation; cultural resources; health, safety and nuisance factors; and aesthetics, as discussed below: A. Land Use snd Plarnln Constderatton: The project area is curren y designated as mum enmity Residential and Neighborhood Commercial under the General Plan, and zoned Community Services under the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Planned land uses surrounding this site are residential io nature. A ;,a` change from residential and limited office /commercial to + neighborhood commercial raoresents a significant land use impact upon the area. - Yes PLANNING COMMIS. JII STAFF REPORT GPA 86-02A and ESPA 86-01 Ray 28, 1986 Page 6 B. Circulation: The site is located at the intersection of Base Line and EEiwanda Avenue. The City Traffic E gtneer has reviewed the proposed land use change and i sted that additional information will be required of the ;,,licant to fully evaluate traffic impacts generated by the project. C. Cultural Resources: Development of the sltc as a 9 acre conw rc a con er could impact cultural resources in two ways. A direct impact could be the disturbance or elimination of the rack curbs on Etiwanda Avenue. Indirectly, the project could impact the adjacent Chaffey -Garcia House and Ettwanda Congregational Church with additional traffic and noise. D. Health Safet z and Nuisance Factors: Development of the site as a neighborhood cow•erc a center could create an increase and potential noise levels and light and glare. E. Aesthetics: The portion of this project site along Etiwanda Avenue lies in the Etlwands Avenue Overlay District. The intent of this district is to protect and enhance the visual and historical charcter of Ettranda Avenue. The proposed project could represent a conflict with the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Analysis* Staff feels that additional information on the five areas Tested above may be necessary prior to final consideration of the General Plan Amendment. If the Comission so desires, the applicant may be required to submit supplemental information such as traffic and noise studies in order to provide mare Information on potential impacts tend proposed mitigation measures prior to further consideration of the amendments. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the Hera n dment and Etivanda Specific Plan Amendment, decide that the change from Low - Medium Density Residential and Community Services to Heighborhood Commercial would promote the land use goals and policies of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan and would not be materially detrimental to the adjacent properties, or would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings necessary on approval. A. The amendment does not conflict with the land use policies of;)� the General Plan and Etlwanda Specific Plan, and S. The amendment does promote goals of the end use element, and ' C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. ., +' PLANNING CONMISSIOh .rAFF PEPGRT V ' GPA 86 -02A and ESPA 86 -01 may 28, 1986 Page 7 r VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing teen in fTio 0 l Rem�e rt newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within = feet of the boundary of the proposed protect. In addition, a 4 foot by a foot supplemental notification sign has bean erected on site. VII. RECONMENDATION: Based on the above analysis, the Commission has sever— Taltarnatives regarding the General Plan Mmdeent /Etlwanda Specific Plan am dm- t application. The alternatives are: Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner 88:LW:cv 1. Deny the amendmmts with no further study. ; 2. Request the applicant to submit additional environmental Exhibit •B• -Land Use Designations information tuber in the form of detailed studies or a focused environmental impact rep]rt with a scope to be " determined by the Commission at this mating. s 3. Approve the amendment as submitted. This would require the issuance of a Negative Declaration. 6 Resolution recommending Approval Staff recowendation is for denial of this application. Should the Commission wish to act upon the request tonight, a Resolution recommending denial of the General Plan Amendment to the City recommending Resolution of Denial Council and a Resolution denying the Etiwanda Specific Plan a ? Amendment, and Resolutions recommending approval of the General �• Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Amendment, and issuance of a + Negative Declaration are attached. ' Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner 88:LW:cv Attachments: Exhibit •A• - Vicinity Nap ; Exhibit •B• -Land Use Designations Exhibit •C• - Site Plan Exhibit •D• - Letter of Justification z Initial Study - Part II Resolution recommending Approval 4; Resolution recomending Approval Resolution Denial s recommending Resolution of Denial r "� Si �• ".1,. cJIQ 'tl �I r!° . RAN o Ci.LCA ONL GA K ANIVM DR%ION m 1 , ViG�+� t-rtivl+► �, MUM, _9 :rg aen• OZ A, aco 7 f Ise BARMAKLAN March 14, 1981' Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Ste. C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Attention: Planning Staff Gentlemen: C I an writing this letter to justify the reasons for an amendment to the General Plan adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This zone change request is being made because of concerns that residents of the Etiwanda area have regarding our corner. Mr. Banks has contacted ■e about the partmants that we had scheduled to build on the proptrty adjacent to our shopping center corner at Etiwanda and Baseline. It is his feeling and those of the Etiwanda residents that a larger commercial designation at that corner would be acceptable to the residents of the Etiwanda area providing the apartments can be eliminated. The Etiwanda Group has several concerns. First, they would like to be sure that we have only specific approval for the specific development that we are proposing and we giv• them an oppportunity to comment and approve our proposed project before the planning commission approves it. Secondly, the center would aesthetically conform to the requireoents of the Etiwanda Specific Plan in ?vary way, particularly with regard to Its rural appearance. Third, the center must be the first on Baseline west of the one proposed at Haven. This exten4s to Fontana. They want the center to be successful so that it will remain clean and safe. If our center 1s not first, they fear that Victoria or Fontana will steal our vitality. EXHIBIT "D" 9375ARCHIGALDAVENUE • SU'rE 101 . RANCHOCUCAMONGA . CALIFORNIA 91730 Development • Brokerage . Property ma,agement . Architecture �31 9, Planning Department Staff March 14, 1486 ` page 2 Fourth, they are expecting us to take reasonable steps, by lease provisions or selectivity or other accpetabla means, to see that. neither the canter nor any part of it becomes a :'hang -out' for any particular group. The stores will be run by reputable- ftrms, to well lit, have wide &isles, be well maintained and otherwise, 'lie rood citizens of the community. T Fifth the center will be other wise committed to preserving the rural atmosphere of Ettwanda in all respects,- including keeping the vast ■ajority of traffic on Baseline and off Ettwanda Avenue which is to remain unchanged with its rock curbs and gutters " restored. I believe that the concerns of the Ettwanda Group are ,justification enough for the shopping center that'we would like to' construct at the northwest corner of Etiwaada and Baseline. tie ' believe that if we meet the requirements of the Ettwanda Groulr, we • will have a very fine center and one that is custom built. Sincerely, C aN inc NAICI CO AMY Andrew Barmakian President °i AB:s■ �'d.e. =�S:R s�� °•, .'.'� +- :iY... :. a.'i..:e. 1.ti ?k�s.7'�'a 1� RESOLUTION NO. 86-69 1. t' A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DESIGNATION FROM ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT COIMMNITY SERVICES TO j, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 9.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AND BASE LINE ROAD - APR: 227- 111 -10, 24, 25, 26. WHEREAS, on the 1st day of Key, 1986, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of May. 1986, the Planning Commission hold a w duly advertised publid hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California ± Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission cannot make the follc -ing TTT05-93: a 1. That the subject property is suitable for the ,uses permitted in the proposed district in terror. of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Callfornta Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends dental on the 28th day of KAY, 1966, No. 86-01. 2. The Planning Coemnisslon hereby recommends that the City Council deny No. 86-01. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Pesolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. . "t a?6 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. °L AN G MISSION 0 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMcYJGk p I, Brad Buller. Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cartsslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution-was duly, and !., regglarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comedssion of -the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commitssion held on the 28th day of Nay, 1986, by the following rote -to -wit: r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPLL, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER f NOES: COMMISSI'11ERS: NONE v M' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT 1, N r� e bRESOLUTION NO. 86-68 P- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF �1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86 -02A. N9EREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Ammndaent No. 86 -02A. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission cannot make the r following Tindings 4 A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. 8. The Amendment promotes gals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. e' NOV. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend denial of General Plan Amendment No.- 86-02A to the City Council. ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLA�I THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIONGA i AI IESI' '�S�C':Y —"�-� ra �u er, piny Satre a� I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of n Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hold on the 28th day of May, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, REINEL ?= NOES: COMISSIONERS: NONE ? ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT yY'f. Y..J? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C-51 DATE: July 2, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BT: Lisa Vintager, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: EVYIROMIEUTAL ASSESSMENT AND GEMERN. PLAN AMENDMENT WOW IAM A request to SUM the nera an from Low Madium Densitya Tesideattil (4488 du /ac) to Neighborhood Coasm"Jal for approximately five acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Ettwanda - APM: 227- 111 -24, 25, and 26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSIENT AND ETIWIDA SPECIFIC PLAN �Wl a Wl — NUUMIM — A request TO &Mad trot LZIWSMU 4PWITIC Plan r—= (CommwHty Service) and LM (Low Medium Density Residential) to NC (Neighborhood Commercial) for 9.4 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Etlwanda - APN: 227- 111 -10, 24, 25, and 26. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant requested a General Plan Amendment and Eiiw 2ppdrccific Plan Amrnd eat from Low Medium Density Restdential/Cemminity Service to Neighborhood Commercial for a 9.4 acre site in order to develop a 94,000 square foot neighborhood shopping center on eis northwest corner of lase Line and Etiwenda Avenue. The attached Planning Commission report pprovides more detailed information regarding this item. The Commission is recommending denial of this request. I). PLANING COMMISSION ACTION: The mt)or issues considered by the ann ng omm ss on a May 28, 1986 meeting ware consistency with tM General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan goals and policies, and land use compatibility. The Planning Commission determined that the proposed land use changgee would be inconsistent with the gals of the Etivanda Speciffc Plan which limits commercial activity and additional traffic generated by commercial uses on Etiwerda Avenue. The proposed neighborhood shopping center would be located within one quarter of a mile of the neighborhood center to be located on Base Line Road in the victoria Planned Community. The Etiwanda Specific Plan states that neighborhood commercial centers should be located no closer than one mile of one another. 2773 N -i r b `I `CITY CDL%T STAFeREPORI + July 2, 19M GPA 96-OZA and ESPA 86 -01 - Barmaktan Page 2 The Commission also stated, that the proposed change to Neighborhood Commercial would he less compatible with- surrounding residential land uses than the existing Low Wdiun Residential /Come+nity Services designation. In conclusion, the Commission felt that the request represented a significant departure from the intent of the Etiwanda Spacific Plan and the General Plan. III. RECOIeENDATI011: e The Planning Commission recommends denial of the Mm t and Etiwanda, Specific Plan Amendment. If the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial would be rewind. d - .l Re ct fully it e Brad Buller City Planner ' 68:LW:dak Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of May 28, 1966 Resolution of Dental of General Plan Aeendment Resolution of Dental of Etiwonda Specific Plan Amendment i J4 �af ^t 7 Y ; O / r b `I RESM 9TION NO. 8 7 -033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL FLAY AyEMIeNT NO. 86 -OZA, REQUESTING AN AMEIDMER4 TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERA"— PLAN FOR 9.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST COMA OF BASELINE ROM AND ETIWANDA AVENUE. WHEREAS, that PTruining Comaission held a duly advertised public hearing on May 28, 1986 to consider ill commemts on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86 -02A; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a dul>> ldvertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Pit Amendmcnt No. 86 -OZA; SECTION 1: Tho Rancho Cucamonga Cit Council cannot make the following Tf A. The Amendment does not conflict with Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of tho Land U. Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby denies General Plan Amendment No. 86 -02A. �11—qt a-77,j = i I r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWAIDA SPECIFIC PUN AWMMENT NO. 86 -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ETIWAIDA SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COWUNITY SERVICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 9.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND ETINAIDA. WHEREAS, on the 14th day of March, 1986, an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the P,Bth'day of Nay, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Goverment Code; WHEREAS, the City Council held a duiy advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Etlwanda Specific Plan Ame •sent No. 86- 01; SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council cannot make the following Tin n- g 1. That the subject property 1s suituble for the uses permitted to the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use to the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change rculd not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed di %trict change is in conformance with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Calfornia Goverment Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies an the Etlwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 86 -01 on the 4th day of February, 1981. 9 A A I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT u DATE: February 4, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinatcr SUBJECT: Ayproval of Rasolution Conflrainc Amended Assessments for Parcel Map 9530 within The Sixth Etreet industrial Park Refundin District (82 -IR), RV,OwMSCDATION• Staff recommends that Council approve the rosolution confirming the amended assessments at the close of the public hearing. EVALUATION: The Street and Highway Code Part 10, Section 8730 thru Section 8734 under Division of Land and Bond provides procedures for the apportionment of assessmento necessitated by the division of land. The attached resolution confirms the amended assessments following the close of the public hearing The Public Hearing Notice has boa. published twice in a local newspspsr a3 specified is The Streets and Highway Code Part 10, Section 8730 thru Section 8934. R`essppectffuul'ly Submitted, .RObe�r�t A. /10 Assistan ity manager RAR:JBF:kma S \ / 077 S� it .1 RESOLUTION UO,% -CCs RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO'JN ^IL OF THE CITY 07 RANCHO CJCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESSM3NTS TH A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, has previously confirmed assessments In a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "MunlcIpal Improvement Act of 19'3" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Cods of the State of California, and bonds .sere issued to represent the corts for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the •Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 of said Code, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -iR (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District") and, NHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and /or parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assessments have boon apportioned or divided, and this legislative body did receive a Reapportionment Report and proposed amended assessment and did set a public hearing on the amended aasesement, all as authorized pursuant to the provisions of Part 10 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 19180; and. WHEM S, at this time all notices have been given as required by law; all persons interested in the original assessment, or in the lands affected thereby, or 'n the bonds secured thereby, did, at the time of the public hearing, hear and datermiue all,objections to the division of the assessments, and, this legislative body Is now desirous to proceed to confirm the amended assessmento. MOH, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS; SECTION 1 Tnat the above recitals are all true and correct. � SECTION 2 That the :.mended assessment contained In the 'Reapportionment Report" Is hereby approved and �, confirmed by thle legislative body. D 7F fwd 4 Y Y h , i i r. 0. 4 � 7 f 4.� l� 1 f �I r a♦ '�i � fi M1 a SRCTI0H 3. The City Clerk shall, immedlately upon adoption of this Resolution, cause the following: _ A. Pile a copy of the amended assessment, as , confirmed, with the County Auditor, who shall annually thereafter enter upon the assessment roll the installments coming due on each component part of the uriginal parcel opposite a descriytion of tho,,; respective parcels so ateessed. ' H. The amount charged for fees and costs as shown on the amended assessment as to each parcel shall be entered upon the assessment _ roll and shall be collected along with the first Installment of the amended assessment. C. All amounto collected for fees and'costs of ' the reapportionment shall be deposited In •: the ^General Fund of the City.",.- D. The amended assessment roll and diagram shall imedlately,be recorded.1n,the Office of the Superintendent of:Streets. Z. A copy of the amended assessment diagram shall Immediately be filed in the Offiee of the County Recorder, and said amended diagram shall crone referenco the original aasesoment diagram for the Assessment _ District. Said mended diagram shall -' contain the informtlon as set forth In Section 8734 of the Streets and Highwaya Code. �I r a♦ '�i � fi M1 a AFFIDAVIT OF PUKICATIWI STATE OF CALIFORNIA u COUNTY OF SAN H :RNARDW Maurine D. Paran .do hereby mWy that I uut Um legal Advertising 4-k of THE D y ,1.ewspaper of geeeral dretladon. putill wd * at ,a Coutay and State atomald WA h.1t the oftheb d +dmidesmett a _Resotctlon No. ST -11 ._ for City of Rancho Cucamonca Y _ _ r w.v published In said twwepaper Two Q) t loes r. to wit. January 33 and 22. 19117 certify under penalty of pxjury that the ttaegAM Is tme and +Y c2rreel d at Ontario, California this _ 22nd _dayof JFP.YArx,19A:L. ie �F Y wfjjiJ f�i �i�4y {fa } ff. I t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DA.31 9ebruary 4, 1987 TOr Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager rROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: AMEMDrnIT TO MUNICIPAL CODS CORCERRIRC CQNWCTAL An IND0STRIAL RRfUSR COLLRCTION Lmmmmnoff It is recommended that City COUncil approve first resdinn of Ordinance Mo. 2911, and set second reading for March 4, 1987. .i1s}Q17g{ Pu.snant to direction received from the City Council, the City Attorney has prepared the attached ordinance which modifies the municipal code relating to commercial and iudastvia! refuse collectica. The modifications to the municipal code provide that nou- permitted comsercial and industrial refuse banlecs operating prior to July, 1106 by continue to service their present accounts only until June 30, 19881 and that so more than three tall - service commercial and iadostriol refuse collection permits nay be active at any one time If you have any questions or concerns r tgavding this mattnr, feel free to contact .e. R�esLp /peeecctfully submitted. -' iob,rt� cio Assist& City Manager RARJtep I j N ORDINANCE NO. _�;Lu A AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 8.19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTION. The Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: Bootie n 1: Section 8.19.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended to read as follows: "s.ig.o4o. pis = use collection IRO establishment gf collection fees. The Council hereby does determine that the disposal and /or collection of refuse, trash, rubbish or other solid waste is a service to be performed in the City in acco dance with the provisions of this chapter. The City may from time to time issue permits to those parties meeting the criteria of this Chapter 8.19 and such other standards as may be established by resolution of the City Council regarding the collection of refuel, rubbish and other forms of solid waste from commercial and industrial establish- ments, provided that no more than three such permits may be exercised or outstanding simultaneously. so long as any such permit remains in force, collection of material provided for herein may be made only in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof. Such fees and charges for such collection, removal and disposal services shall be those which the Council may from time to time here- after approve by resolution. No person shall engage in the business of collecting, removing or disposing of any refuse, trash, rubbish or other solid waste within the City from any commercial or industrial establishment nor transport the same over any public streets or rights -of- way, unless a permit to do so has been obtained from the Council and such person complies with the provisions of this chapter and any other regulations which have been adopted pursuant to this chapter." section 1: Subsection 8.19.2708 hereby is added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "B. Notwithstanding any contrary provision set forth in this Chapter 8.19, any person who was providing commercial or industrial refuse collection services to customers within City as of the effective date of City's Ordinance No. 291 may continue to service any or all of `T MAZEMd- V , flS j' 1 j ordinance No. Page 2 tk �i those customers for a period of two years commencing with that effective date." section 1: The Mayor shall sign this Orditunicm and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Dally Report, a r newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of 1987. Denn s L. Stout, Mayor 7 I, BEVERLY A. AOTHRLET, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do heraby certify that the foregoing ordinance the City Council of the was introduced at a regular meeting of City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 1987, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day of 1987, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: r ` •� "+ ATTEST: r} Beverly A. Authelet, City clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga t E; t r :ni 2 d43 � C)TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 4, 1957 T0: City Council and City Nonager TBUN: Nark B. Lorimer, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: ANEEDNEBTS TD CWMITT TMDATTOB BYLAWS BCOItlODITIOY ' It to recommended that the City Council mend the Bylaws of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation to provide for a amen umber Board of Directors and for appropriate tens of office. i Background At the request of the City Council, staff has prepared r aendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Bylaws pertaining o the number of directors. This amendment new establishes a seven ember board of directors rather than a membership of five. In addition, the provision establfabinb the teas of office for the lint amen ambers elected :o the Board has been amended accordingly. The actual mendments to Article V, Section 1 and Section 3 are as follows (Amendments are to bold): Article V Board of Directors Section 1. Smcber of Directors. C The Board of Directors shall consist of fiv,&" scum (7) voting ambers. Section 3. Selection and Tea of Office. The Board of Directors shall be comprised of Five- W-•eves (7) scubers elected by a aajority vote of the fell City Council. Each Board amber shall serve for a tea of four years; except for the first Sire..0)- moves (7) ambers elected to the Board of Directors, of which e►saa..411 four (4) ambers shall sane teas cf four years each and tows -4Z)- tbree (3) ambers shall serve two years each. Teas of office for all ambers shall M doteraised b7 a raw" drum. 0+'6 T R Amendments to Community Foundation Bylaws , Pate t February, ♦. 1987 In the event the City Conseil mends the Bylaws as recommended, staff will schedule a first mastlug of the Comity Foundation for porpoess of introducing the Board of Directors and officially treating the Fosodttiou. A copy of tle entice Fouadation Bylaws as attached for your rafeteaee. dbould you have any Questions or coamments cesardisg this amendment, please do not hesitate to contact at at your convenience. 87d. /dJa Attached t(+ 543 6• a` 1 ♦ � -_ tip 1_ 1_ 4� 4- BYLAWS OFD• THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ARTICLE I Name The name of this corporation shall be The Rancho Cucamonga community Foundation. ARTICLE II Principal office The principal office of this corporation for transaction of business is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino, California, at 9720 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. The Board of Directors has full power and authority to change the principal office of this corporation from one location to another in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ARTICLE III Purpose The purposes of The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation are to lesson the burdena of government and to promote and support the cultural, recreational and human services needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ARTICLE IV Membership This corporation shall have no members other than the persons constituting its Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall, under any statute or rule of law, be the members of this corporation and shall have all the rights and powers members would otherwise have. j ARTICLE V Board of Directors Section 1. Number of Directors. The Board of Directors shall cons st o! five 5) vot ng mem ere. Section 2. Powers of Directors. Subject to the provision of the cnfitornia Nonprofit Corporat on Law and any limitations in the y Articles of Incorporation and these Bylaws, the business and .e affairs of this corporation shall be managed, and all corporate t powers shall be exercised by or under the direction of the Board t of Director*- -I- .IV The Board of Directors may delegate the performance of any duties or the exercise of any powers, to such officers or agents as may from time to time, by resolution be designated. Section 3. Selection and Term of Office. The Board of Directors s al • eompr —iced of-ilv (5) m•m�ero •Seated by a majority vote of the full City Council. Each board m +mbar shall serve for a term of four yearsi except for the first five members elected to the Board of Directors, of which three members shall serve terms of four years each and two members shall serve terms of two years each. Section 4. Vacancies. A vacancy in any Director position because of removal, death, resignation, expiration of term or otherwise, shall be filled by a three- fifths (3/5) vote of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council. Any person ealected to fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors shall hold office for the unexpired term of his or her predecessor in office, subject to the power of removal contained herein. Section S. voting. Each member of the Board of Directors shall ava one vote. Thera shall be no proxy voting permitted for the transaction of any of the business of this corporation. section G. Annual Meeting. There shall be an annual meeting of the Board of— rectors on the third Monday in January each year. Section 7. Meetings. Meetings of the Board of Directors for any purpose or purposes shall be called at any time by the chair- person. The chairperson shall be required to call a meeting upon the joint request of any member of the Board. All meetings of the Board of Diractors shall be governed by Robert'■ Rules of order, including such revisions thereof an may from time to time be published, except insofar es such rules are inconsistent with these Bylaws, with the Articles of Incorporation, or with applicable law. Section 8. Place of Meetings. Meetings of the Board of Drreetore—shall- Se—ho7a at any pfice within this State which has been designated from time to time by resolution of the Board or by written consent of all members of the board. In the absence of such designation, meetings shall be held at the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. Section 9. Notice of meetings. (a) Written notice of every regular meeting shall be given to each Director at least seven (7) days before each meeting. Notice may be delivered personally or by mail to the lant known address of the addresses and, it mailed, is complete upon mailing. Written notice of any meeting shall also be given pursuant to this subsection to any person who requests such notice in writing. 7`: r; -p- C;�g7 (b) An agenda listing the matters to be considered at each meeting shall be given to each Director, and to any person so requesting, at least maven (7) days before the netting. (c) Netvithetanding anytl ng in U.s section to the contrary, the chairperson may call an emergency meeting of the Board without giving the normal notice if such a meeting is necessary to discuss any unforeseen em•rSincy condition. Hi emergency condi- tion for the purpose of this subsection is any condition that, if not addressed by the Board promptly, may result in a detriment to this corporation or to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Notice of any emergency meeting may be delivered personally, telephone or mailed, and shall be received at least twenty -four (24) hours before the time of such meeting. _ Section lo. open Meeetiin s. All meetings of the Board shall be open and p—bu 1 of , and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting of the Board, provided, however, that the Board may hold closed sessions during any meeting to consider those matters that may lawfully be considered in such sessions under Chapter 9 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title S of the Government Code, commencing with Section 54950. Section 11. Quorum. A majority of the total number of voting J rectors ■hail constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at every meeting. Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the Directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be regarded as tba act of the Board of Directors. Section 12. Removal of Directors_ Directors of this co:por- gor�on may bi remove3-Yt any tiai without cause by the vote of three (1) Directors, subject to the approval by a three- fifths (1/5) vote of the City Council. This section is not subject to amendment, change or alteration in any of its olauses or provi- sions without the consent of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council. Sect'on 11. Compensation. The Directors of the corporation •�i be nTlowid and paid _kheir actual and necessary expenses inc..rred in attending the meetings of the Board and such other amounts as may be fixed from time to tins by the vote of a majority of the Board. ARTICLE VI Offi. ire Section 1. officers. The officers of this corporation shall be a�rpirson —vc cchairperson, and secretary- treasurer. Section Z. Election. The Board of Directors shall elect all of�era o! tWIs corporation for terms of one year, or until their successors are elected and qualified. The annual election -1- . AI 4, shall be hold on the third Monday in January. All officers shall be drawn from the Board membership. Section 7. Chairperson. Subject to the control of the Board of D retors, • c • rperson shall preside at all meetings of the Board, and shall have such other powers and duties as may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors. The chairperson shall have a vote on all matters. Section 1. Vice Cho i • •rson. In the absencr or disability of the c airperson, t v ce chairperson shall perform all the duties of the chairperson. The vice chairperson shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors. Section S. Secretary-Treasurer. The secretary - treasurer shall ass st the cha rperson in the }reparation of the agendas for the meetings, shall keep a full and complete record of the pro- ceedings of all meetings of the Board of Directors, shall keep the seal of this corporation and affix the same to such papers and instruments as may be required in the regular course of business, shall provide such notices as may be necessary and proper, shall rupervisa the keeping of the books of this corpora- tion and shall discharge such other duties as pertain to the office or as prescribed by the 9oard of Directors. The secretary- treasurer shall be the chief financial officer of this corporation and, if ■o requ_rcd by the Board of Directors, shall give a bond for the faithful discharge of his or her duties in such sum and with such surety as the Board of Directors shall deem appropriate. The secretary- treasurer shall submit an annual report to the Board on or about the first Monday in October of inch year. In case of the absence on disability of the sec- retary- treasurer, or his or her refusal or neglect to act, such notices may be provided by the chairperson, or by the chairperson or by any person thereunto authorised by the chairperson or by the vice chairperson, or by the Board of Directors. ARTICLE VII Defense and Indemnification This corporation shall defend any Director who is a party or is *hreatened to be made a party to any proceeding, ottar than an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that such Director is or was an agent of this corporation, and will indemnify any such Director against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and any other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection w_th such proceedingB if such Director acted in good faith and in a manner such Director reasonably believed to be in the beat interest of this corporation and, in the case of a criminal proceeding, if such Director had not reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful. -4- D O 4J ARTICLE VIII Conflict of Interest No member of the board of Directors shall be financially interested in any contract or other transaction entered into by the Board of Directors, and any contract or transaction entered into in violation of this is void. No Director may utilise information obtained by reason of Board nesbaerahip for personal gain, and the Board of Directors may recover any such gain realired. Amendment ARTICLE fBylaws Thew Bylaws may be amended at any regular meeting of the Board of Directors by a majority vote of the total voting membership of the Board of Directors, providing that the aaendment has been submitted in writing at the previous regular meeting. CERTIFICATE a SECRETARY- TREASURER I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty o! perjury. 1. That I am the duly elected and acting Secretary - Treasurer of The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation, a California corporation; and 2. That the constitutes the BylawsgofnsaidlCorporationias duly adopted at meeting of the Board of Directors theroof duly hold on the day of 1986. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name on this day of , 1986. Sacretary-zroasurer ki 7 TA -S- .