The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/01/06 - Agenda Packet - carnelianGARY MITCHELL & ASSOCIATES LAND PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING 9370 BASELINE BURP 203 , RANCHO CUCAYONOA, CA 91701 • PHONE (7141 989990! January 6. 1988 �= City of Rancho Cucamonga 1, P.O. Box 807 7 a Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 1. ATTN: BEVERLY AUTHELET {Y CITY CLERK _ REe 1WO WEEK CONTINUANCE OF APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION RELATING TO UTILITY " UNDERGROUNDING FOR CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS Honorable Mayor and City Council Membersi On oehalf of our Client, California Finished Metals, we are hereby requesting a tao week continuance of an Appeal of the Planning Commission's determination to require the undergrounding of existing utility lines along the south side of Seventh Street We request that the continuance be from the date above. GM/ra Thank you for your attention to this matter. Truly yours, GARY ITCHELL & ASL.•"IATES At Gary ltchel*��p�� Pr's ent I w I '1 i 3 ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFO RMATiDN TO ITEM C -IS Of COUNCIL AGEND (ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR NE INPRCYEMENT OF Ban_ AND OMS PARKS) i Funding for "a Increased scope of services for the Beryl /Lions Pari tennis court improvements shell be from the Park Development Fund. Adequate funding is available under thif 'rust fund from non - designated revenues received to date this year. The folltw'-. account numbers and expenditures wilt be applied. Lions Park 20 -4532 -0006 $ 6,652.44 Beryl Park 20- 4532 -8007 $11,826.56 Upon authorization by City Council, Community Services will execute Change Onier No. 1 to Recreation Systems, Inc. for a sum not to exceed $18,479.00. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free 'A contact me. Respectfully submitted, Assistant City Manager RAR:DL /d,la cc: Administrative Services Department - Finance City Council Agenda January 6 1988 PAGE — 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is S:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. UJ.L TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Roll Call: Brown �, Buquet , Stout Wr King and ght _. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of S -Year Service Award: Councilmember Jeffrey King 2. Presentation of 10 -Year Service Awards: Rex Whitney, Maintenance Crew Supervisor Beverly Authelet, City Clerk, Records Management Coordinator James C. Frost, City Treasurer 1 CONSENT CALENDAR (he following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will he acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Item may be removed by a Councllmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 12/16/87, 12/23/87, 1 and 12/30/87 and Payroll ending 12/24/87 for the total amount of $1,637,9I9.02. 'L. Approval to receive and file current Investment 13 Schedule as of December 22, 1987. 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Ceer and 21 Wine, Stop N Go Markets, National Convenience Stores Incorporated, Southwest Corner of Haven Ave. and Lemon. 4. Alcoholic Beverage application for Off Sale General, The 23 I Voris Companies, Inc. 877E 19th Street. (fvE% +A ♦ w PAGE City Council Anendaa ._ 25 S. Alcoholic for ofr Sale 8939 F000thill OF RANCHO CUCAMDHGA, CALIFORNIA ALTERHXTE VE ON THE OF Blvd. 27 6. Approval to mwlify lease for rental of City property at by dropping the 111 N. Grove, Upland, California. restriction of no children over, three years of age authorize the 31 9. property and allowed I0. sign the new lthe 28 Approval to declare as surplus and authorize 7. three stallonsty B. 1Director,i9& atalternate erepresentative�onstthe 29 Finance California Municipal Insurance Board of Director: of the Authority. 30 il. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -001 A RESOLUTION OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DESIGNATING AN OF RANCHO CUCAMDHGA, CALIFORNIA ALTERHXTE VE ON THE OF DIRECTORS REOFESTHEACALIFOR IA NOIRCiPAL INSURANCE WITHORITY placement vehicle from Antprovalrnmental 31 9. Service Fund. I0. o execute Contract Order 3 to C Associates for Design 32 87 20a 87-20 for Greek Administration Services Z r the follOWIst,PrO3 Alta 19th Street Improvements. District and the Arrcw Route Bridge Loma Assessment eeeach of dbudgetedl Widening (bein� D idC from) then funds fo respective project. 34 il. Professional Approval to prepare title -1 ithoUn United itle company litigation guarantees, escrow services, etc.. to reports, for 19th Street Improvement from Nest City Limits 612,750.00 to be StreSt. The maximuentfFund� funded from 35 12. Approval to purchase a Hi- Ranger Hodel 5H -55 from Nest a, as the;mountoof 535,987 -000rn sole sourcetvendorPffor `mot t •1` a° City rouncil Agondd JanuprX 6. 198R PAGE — 13. Concept approval to modify the conditions of approval of 36 Tentative Tract 12671 to include the construction of a traffl. signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, direction to the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing for the purpose of considering such modification at their January 27, 1988 meeting and approval to allow the crediting of the costs of the traffic signal incurred by the developer against System Development. RESOLUTION Y0. 88 -002 42 A RESOIUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRfCT1NG THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AT THEIR JANUARY 27. 1988 MEETING, FOR THE PURPOSE OF MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF TERTA71VE TRACT 12671 TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTIOR OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE 14. Authorize the appropriation of $20,732.84 from the 43 Federal Aid Urban Funds, (FAU) account number 24 -4637- 8068, for the final payment for the Archibald Avenue Trunk Sewer and Street Constrvction project to T.A. Rivard. Incorporated. 15. Approval to authorize the expenditure of $18,479.00 from 44 the Park Development Funds for increased drainage and hardcourt facility design work at Beryl and Lion Parks by Recreation Systems, Inc. 16. Approval of authorization to expend $38,864.64, plus 45 $12.65 per day interest from November 30. 1987 from account number 22 -4637 -8:24, to reimburse Lewis Homes for Base Line Road improvements adjacent to City Park site per park site purchase agreement from Systems Fund. 17. Approval to authorize the advertising of Cie "Notice 46 Inviting Bids' for the Arrow Route Street Improvement Project, Phase 1, located between Archibald Avenue and Turner Avenue. a� City Council Agenda kouaa 6. 1939 PAGE — a RESOLUTION NO. 88 -003 47 A RESOLUTION OF THE C17Y COU!!CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ". IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BiDS 18. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice 52 Inviting Bids" for the Base L!ne Road Widening Improvement Project, from Archibald Avenue to Hellman Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -004 53 A RESOLUTION OF TUE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE *BASE LINE ROAD WIDENING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS 19. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for: Tract 12316 -1 - located on the south side of Base Line 57 Roam east of Haven Avenue west of Beer Creek Flood Channel. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $45,830.00 20. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for: OR 86 -07 - located on the northeast corner of Haven 58 Avenue and 6th Street. Faithful Performance Band (Street) $10,600 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -005 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86 -07 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 4 � i .a City Council Agenda PAGE! ted on the northwest corner of Foothill rOF 60 Klusean Avenue. Performance Band (Street) $14,000 61 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -006 IP F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY r' ICHGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC I,.AMOVEMENTS FOR OR 86 -17 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 62 12952, located east of Haven Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel and south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Glenfed Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -007 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12952 21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extention for Tract 64 12952 (Storm Drain), located east of Haven Avenue, west of Jeer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Glenfed Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -008 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING E EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENTN SECURITY FORT TRACT 12952 DRAIN) ?3. Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public 66 Improvement and Dedication (CO 88 -02) between Wayne and Erma Dennis and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9540 Roberds Court, located on the north side of Base Line road between Archibald and Amethyst. E ,� r w�d•f City Council Agenda Januery 6. 180 PAGE - 67 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -009 A RESJLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM WAYNE AND ERMA DENNIS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 24. Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public 68 Improvement and Dedication (CO 88 -03) between James and Stella Harrell and the City of Ranrho CucamOngn for Street Frontage Improvements at 9840 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Arcl ibald and Turner. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -010 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JAPES AND STELLA HARRELL. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAMS 25. Approval o' Agreement for Installation of Public. 72 Improvement and Dedication (CO 88 -04) between Martin and Marie Lozano, Miguel Ruiz and Rose Marie Briseno and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9850 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner. 73 RESOLUTION NO. 08 -011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM MARTIN AND MARIE LOZANO. MIGUEL RUIZ AND ROSE MARIE BRISENO, AND AUTHORIZING 11 4AYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 26. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 74 Security for MDR 86 -24 located on the east side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Russel. Stanley West, Incorporated. ;r ,., ,,•1 City Council Agenda January 6. 1988 PAGE: a — Z. 7 , RESOLUTION NO. 89 -012 75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREFIIENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86-24 ;7. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 77 Security for DR 87 -21 located on the south side of Sixth Street, between kchibald Avenue and Lucas Rancho Road, submitted by The Baraakian Group. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -013 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -21 28. Set public hea ring for February 3. 1988 - Approve; to 80 Annex Tract Nos. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13445, Parcel Mdp 10611, OR 87 -21, DR 87 -15 and OR 87 -09 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 35. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -014 81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU14CIL OF THI: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 35 TO STREET LIGHT111G MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -015 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DIS,RICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION ND. 35 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Agenda .A nUn" 6. IAAA PAGE 29. Set public hearing for February 3, 1988 - Approvar to 96 Annex Tract Ms. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13444 and 13J45 (Victoria) to Street Lighting Maintenance district No. 3 as Amnexation No. 7. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -016 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMIIL4RY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 t RESOLUTION NO. 88 -017 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAPCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 30. Set public hearing for February 3, 1988 - Approval to 109 Annex Parcel Map 10617, OR 87 -21, OR 87 -15 and OR 87 -09 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance Distr!ct Ito. 6 as Annexation No. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -018 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 �.� City Council Agenda January 6, 1988 PAOe _ 9 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -019 119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT .0 THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 /UIO OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECT15HS THERETO 31. Set public hearing for February 3, 1988 - Approval to 121 Annex Parcel Map 10617, OR 87 -21, OR 87 -15, 02 87 -09 and MDR 86 -24 (Industrial /Cenmercial) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation ?to. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 88120 122 A RESOLUTION OF 'GIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 2F PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION 00. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -021 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOHGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISFRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENARCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO 7HE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING ODJECTIO.AS THERETO D_CORSEMT ORDINAPCES The following Ordinances have had p'iblic hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any itea can be removed for discussion. ti� PAGE city Council 1, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ENOMEN7 O6 - —CITY RAr.CH6 CUCAMON� - praposa to amend le Victoria Camm'Unity Pan Text to require a Conditional Use permit for certain coa=nity facilities as specified i nt PlaLnesmnlnitY Facility sectis of the Victoria Comminity ORDINANCE NO. 332 (second reading; 134 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COMITY AMENDMENT 87 -03, 70 MODIFY TAE COMNUNIf/ PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES AS SPECIFIED IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARDS AND COMMUNITY FACILITY SECTIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEA4I111GS The public lhearlingsias er required by lawYTheuchalr' will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. OMERING THE WORK IN COHNELTION MITII_ A. ANNEXATION N0. 41 FOR OR R5 -06 PCL. 3 OF PM 8345 140 �AVEN�VENUE LEND RT PESN ENO Np CE DISTR LT N0� OF RESOLUTION NO. 88 -022 141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WORK IIIICONNECTIONAWITH IANNEXATION�NO- 41 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 80. 1 AND ACCEPTIF..S ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 3 OF PARCEL MAP 8345) 8S- 06 146 B. ANNEXATION N0. 11 FOR OR 86 -39 NORTHWEST COAXER OF TH TREET AND HELY.S VENU N00.TR COMMERCIAL O - D C P IIiTEN CE DISTRICT N0. 3. S♦ inLE r A4 MA y City Council Agenda - Januar 6 1988 11 RESOLUTIOd NO. 88 -023 147 A RESOLUTION OF T;1E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA.9CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDEPING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 110, 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 86 -39 C. ANNEXATION NO. 24 FOR TRACT N0. 13444 DR OS -06 AND 153 R r 9 R LOCATIONS THR OG UT TH C Y TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAALL DISTRICT NO. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -024 154 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOhGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 34 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13444, DR 85 -06 AND DR 86-39 I it is recommended that this issue be continued to January 20, 1988. 0. ANNEXATION NO. 7 FOR OR 86 -39 NORTHWEST CORNER OF 163 9TH STREET AND HELMS AVEMU-rONDUSTRIAL/COXMERCIAL 0 STREET LIGHTING MAINTEMANCL D1 TR CT NU. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -025 164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 4R0 j ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 86 -39 It is recommended that this issue be continued to January 20, 1988. 2. APPROV AL OF RESOLUTION CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESS"ENTS 170 FUN PARCEL MAP 10643 AND PAXUL MAP 10009 WITHIN THE SIXTH STREET NDU RI PUK REFUND DISTRICT 182- R . PAGE City Council Agenda) - i�06, RESOLUTION 110. $8.026 171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82- IR FOR PARCEL NAP 10543 AND PARCEL MAP 10008 3. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESSMENTS 173 OR R CTITMMAPP 13118 WITHIN THE STORM DRAIN CHANNEL ASSESSMENT DISTR RESOLUTION NO. 88 -027 174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86- 2 FOR TRACT NAP 13118 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-27- 176 CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS - Appeal of the Plann.ng Commissions decision requiring undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along 7th Street for a proposed warehouse addition in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the southeast corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street (APN 209 - 262 -13). 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIGhAL USE PERMIT 87- 183 05 - APPEAL - CROSS AND CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH - ppedl of the Planning Coamtssion s decision approv ng a 4900 square foot sanctuary building and a 2300 square foot office and classroom building; and operation of an extended day nursery and preschool on 5 acres of land in the very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etfwanda Specific Plan, located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 227- 061 -03. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN 211 AMENDMENT 87-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA amendment to provide procedures for requesting modification of rail service development standards and to authorize woe 'um wholesale storage and distribution• as a permitted use in Subarea 13 bounded by the I -15 Freeway on the east, Bufralo Avenue on the west, approximately 280' south of 8th Street on the north end approximately 1,335' north of 4th Street on the south. i�06, PAGE City Council Agenda January 6. 1988 13 ORDINANCE NO. 333 (fir :t reading) 219 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -02 ADDING SECTION G.6 TO PART III AND INCLUDING `MEDIUM WAREHOUSING STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION• AS A PERMITTED USE IN PART V. SUBAREA 13 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (ISP) 7. TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 87 -04 - WESTERN 221 PROPERTIES - A request to modify the land use esignations fro L, Office Park (OP), Community Commercial (CC) and Commercial (C) to Community Commercial within the Terra Vista Planned COmmunity, located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APH. 1077- 421 -05. 06, and 13. ORDINANCE NO. 334 (first reading) 235 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIT" COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY ANENUIENT 87 -04 TO MODIFY THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM OFFICE PARK (OP), COMMERCIAL (C) AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO OFFICE PARK (OP) AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) INVOLVING A 71 ACRE PARCEL WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND SPRUCE AVENUE - APN 1077- 421 -5. 6 AND 13 F. PUBLIC HEARIFGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive mrblic testimony. 1. EMINENT OGMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT -OFYAY FOR 245 THE BASE LINE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN CHtBA 0 AVENUE AND HEt.LM RVEMUE - at the property located at 49 Roberds Court PN 202 - 161 -09) for the construction of street improvements across the Bast Line Road frontage of said property. (Nearing continued from December 16, 1987.) r PAGE City Council Agenda — January 6 1988 14 RESOLUTION NO. 07-690 246 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPEkTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF NG 2. BASE LINE VIDENI PROJECT BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND HAVEN 249 VENUES - Pub is ar ng of protests regarding Order to construct Public Improvements at 9549 Robe rds Court in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Improvements along Base Line frcntage of property). (Hearing continued from December I6, 1987.) RESOLUTION NO. 87.691 252 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 9549 ROBERDS COURT (APH 202- 161 -09) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHVAYS, SECTIONS 5870 THROUGH 5880. MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTEr 27 OF THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The followinq items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. (Redevelopment Agency will Reconvene) 1. POLICY DIRECTION AND AIITHORIZA71ON rOR THE CITY TO 258 PERFORM MAINTENANCE REPAIRS HE NORTH 510E OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ETWEEN LHIB D AND D R THE UNIQUE CONDITION OF THIS SCCT ON OF FOOTHILL. (Redevelopment Agency Adjourns) r City Council Agenda January PAG3 ' - H. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They a-e not public hearing Items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. Haven Median Report - Buquet. 260 2. Discussion of tree replacement program - Stout. 3. Appointment of persons to Gardiner N. Spring Aud!torium 262 Committee - Stout. I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to Identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. K. ADJOURNMENT I. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 31, 1087, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Line Road. lPJJOFPN M• YPP p! }O Y0, 0 y!! F P y N PPYN •PPYN11�1.. Y � Nr rlp S.IV IylJpOGJ��Sj.Ip MYNIYY Y,p M V Pei'< <� > > <ilrwtaQY^ « >S�r°'71fi ^Sin yf €7R�c� Qn sfa. ` il}NTS Pr�N �n Dew • BMT_M � y 111 a 000< ^T ^�aR ii'sT•. >=MT Ta >y i � a T ppw yTTP�Q T ►ys _�f Op SM N1 Lx � w P p .neeC<G �.VXIl r.•sGGO sSs ff�ur•1 3 r111TT O_ A ) y �lPw F�P^VFnO(t i��4 �111Tr•1 T H.° T r Q orMTw Tr T.. fff111111..IT TN r ^/� n N S P Ni7N T� Di SG T i <DyA L ilrll �.°nyby aw �^ i i:Pr i a i «112 w< Or tl V nT L n ynTWIT =MT n xxxQ Y O F Nr "asp _ I at". . w o <w s Paa n.^ es7 Y A T e n i :1 z�yTe.+wy►y PNrrwr ♦ lrTrr T n n ^ca °CxNZltnwNnCiRi1 i�C » + s Q D A fNrrNYyf NrNw AM >wPn P '•� aii Pa»i r'" «r .iN °i tirr sGP T'I a °as GcTCyowi..w CC nr N: Tr� ��'PI i4 .>- .° -••JYi +tea B ^�T. rl°sTlTxnirexotNlwDln•a ^.°Is of il°1�,..w •i f vwa ww ° ai a. •'aw +o Tea ors AV.* y1N 1� _ yyf Ot Y //��i QF FaiZT AwNT�On >yiw i wny Na a fnNrrgw �ES.E: SB i a w Ig Ly NAyO V V`Si rGl i 500 T T x N NNvoN woi>we � eN4eTe y as « 0 0 VVTN Ny x°y iOrTy _ N rq eM�z. m.zlwr ei<. °1°»n r�wT O1lriS S° wx, n m -11 or? Y ADir A >a MDO LA A 1� D a Or!•.wD VVL� y N± pyn =NG r MNJGa_PwuVMwG Hlxi.° InZT Pw0'S�w i A sYT'1 .r.MS y ^.x. � __GNPar ovy� 1 1 N 1 1 1 NY. 4YM444NNYNM4YN4yy4M4 NNMMNYrrw S8� E° 88888888888 w88888E888888E3e��Vvg= VVYVVYyy 4NNNN NNNrrrrr J +PJpMOO� PIYYU O' PO YPP lYNrOePVlPJY4`:�.••M•p•V: <Ip• _Y Y! y y r4.N NOY z%%%5 ONYVN Y y src-YaluLPJUrpvYr �n PPyu YYS }o J OPrOV Op OrO ppPOY°PP Ma'yy IVNPOV J JPOJV °VOJY YpVYyVO�}OO�y iVYVOV L O V W O rP olvu w 1� ill° • '�ri1J'1��•�� SI N I V ' w 1 b i 1 i ti S IT �n a F 0 e yr 9 A i ` A D > � r 1 Em- OrwYUwr• /YMr NMYN (J I /OOY NJmyy %NFrYyO JJNwww•pVFlSFMwy yOpYwMY�P•• / NrJYw«MMiMN••JYV Y yNt aC lilyyrjS i n sRUPEE �a .ii• / I y �l•t�< iy�!NOr I Tf C� YSSriONwy�FTM�YN :.co yQr� +n e Y enr 13nr G' SLI ao$8$i8P*ovilTas�r+ +im Pr � ► Tai �ri� P Ymori rNrTTrPT NzT auo t+f..$`° vr�E�i:ET'TYwre eg '•li�o�nsi � T n N� Orr Y.•Y •f AN i iN i••r iNr m � �i a..' «TNT rn•n n••S rN m >P O N PPPPl^i OS «1 �nC yC}P r0�«iiR i w Y N Oww.°yT OL += iEfiPr n C N ng .° O MrY.. YcN �N• OM I -TiMOa PNTyN }UaT fi YY•<O••.• 1i "�n�/r•,.iw�g�aT]9/i.�< i ^i�nee�ysTNN P/ gn a NT +: siei�i Rio +• �yNN x.YiY .° se T z c5 Nnzny °7I •T.i(�s�3 s�'n �n.- ;•N. �.°.. °1L .P.zs i P 11)(� rTaN i n•nNY C MTNny�nnnnn TT O= Nennn° Q•r �' •T•P. /e Peo i or ° • ..ro N o • •° • VO peee Evi n rYrY� i C our N a$J.na -IN ps �vAp. J /O � O Nr i ONrr� u• s /iw NNN y UO N •NT T Y nNNN yNNNNN4NNNNNMNMYNN4NNNNNNNN44MNYN4NNNNNNM 8$88$�8858�88$88$�8s$A�gB °s �N�g8k�Sw8S�$�8 :wi.° «rg <OyN « +vr.. «oa °w yorFJy�orr oowYa :�..y N.+•oJSY► rF _NY tiYU MN y•• ywJ yy plpMN •MMYY P•.Y V Y MYY ✓ yNMYpM......... .1.... OYJY�ry$•OJ�NOfP yNNyyJUU �OMOJN4MMYywJMYOJOOVJNO�•O NYUPOY }90 OV$ O +.MpVO«pNJPi4lJOVOONONO ►YNOUwOY ' / 4 ♦ " T_y Y it M S i Q 1 n 8 g P 1 O s° n � N r I C 1 1 w 8 T 4 '�wwr `u +POrwNrrP yP�`oPOrYi `or Pr i w• -,( +YreapMNII a.«Flay Sri uuPrPPrJ_w `1 w f. 'r YNNYM^ lVp�P 4M ♦Y�rYMf pNYP P �M i rV r�•Cr�}eI /IQ •nNNNTS YsPUneVO LwwF y v n iiQ i � •a�lggg Yr nnR�'iT»C A(30g Ar(w� �� e.(�y f� TVn P�r >f Nr•! r� � r A }Z'wCC}1 /w CL ncy i^i}<, }^�O.r'ip nrl nii Y.V.•�.}i 1 /OPx•TA �Mn nC rI TYMy T M >y >�Oiy )O =�Or� Y A rry YPP /N� V N� ay iJY 1.1 N2 MVNhV 1 Y_O fMf TO iw �iA Vq a.01 w num A jAN N w Afl iU .• N AO i • O••N !SY r T M• S n O (tea •' O � i n O wr;,sod. Nn�TMwNl a T.s ��' ^rinwo ••Qaw ^wnC <>^�. § ;S F-.': .1 «NPrPnN rM {�N•.,r Nn Y :• nnnNNa N:enn «nN..n onNY°N•nn.°.n N n` s�an� ae�lran Sneo Neaieo+o« �oae .ner � •iN rTwVY aVrrr aaV M V y «T�ror wa>Sx ruse TYZ�uYZ � u «a z aaao,°oe w.°a sa e� nos +s N,e a aiaN o n rrs.l. =PSa err r rl'n �. x -F `ir Sro. ylGrrnT �.°. ryrF r F « «MwN Fy9Z.1'. r'.'•° °.� .xi.° N S' « O��i�`= OwF •ONi�O.°•.O. ^OV= «OOOnO0000ON8O CN8RNRSSR408-84-- $NppON N4yNNyMNrrVrrrVrrMOYOppO 000ppYrrr+ril ++��ya oKP VpVJV4rOrIVPP lV4rOrrVMM�YNrOrIVPMJVNrOrIV ro P i °•• M f P VP 4 O VNNPr MNIVY PVIVN�M(I PrI Pr PJ M yVYrpV.............r... ......Vr.(rYYr JVSJJ VYYJ pOVO aV yPylfPPpO IJPVVYPJiIrrPNPVraV +OPYr rOVO°M OOOPPVOVVPYOPMVjfPPOVOON .JIO +VPYVOOVVO f O 9 r 0 n O 1 i w a + a n y V 1 }y- - r - . +'• 9. is - =t 1 YY y4YlMVlyyP PV ryl� ►Nl�/a IOJMINVO!lllOO �.' 68MOOJV °yNNL J ►OOOJN r! 4JVYY1VY1 Y00' NV YJP��lMOlIFlFNlVN M.�L Lyy�YOMMOrIMrSPJIr 7T 4P: a 0.. `� .PO nP I ng f0 MC�M r „A �Gspa �� Zxftow JuA nw M Tpn ENn DA [lw M1�� t1MNrtEANM° 0r4N CE OrOJrEY y rS TurrP�lM Ay A DD oa OA E . ;F f0 ^+TaVPVe `PY a W Y wY y ;T P• NY .an .a. w.�. NVN yN r °r °sr wYw44NNwyyNM4NNN1�NwNYwwNNNNN � � ° 000000��e0000eoo�oo�e��o00� M��F�MO'��Fy� °YPwIYNr O.IP YPMI VNr Oa O.P YYYYYYVN �� P O t 7t 9 f � r LNLY rVYrP Pr J r Y ON ►Y �r4Y Y 1� PP PYUYYPP NPU OVNNNMYrPYyy .OV M ►lNP OVPI yYVJ OPMOYYPNyAVY�VVyV�/YYV lYNOrvaNPVYJNY �j l N /VOOaJVOIiUp VlOMYOYOYVOlOOiOMSOP►VOVONVO /Y 4 — t s t a x 7T 4P: a 0.. `� .PO nP I ng f0 MC�M r „A �Gspa �� Zxftow JuA nw M Tpn ENn DA [lw M1�� t1MNrtEANM° 0r4N CE OrOJrEY y rS TurrP�lM Ay A DD oa OA E . ;F f0 ^+TaVPVe `PY a W Y wY y ;T P• NY .an .a. w.�. NVN yN r °r °sr wYw44NNwyyNM4NNN1�NwNYwwNNNNN � � ° 000000��e0000eoo�oo�e��o00� M��F�MO'��Fy� °YPwIYNr O.IP YPMI VNr Oa O.P YYYYYYVN �� P O t 7t 9 f � r LNLY rVYrP Pr J r Y ON ►Y �r4Y Y 1� PP PYUYYPP NPU OVNNNMYrPYyy .OV M ►lNP OVPI yYVJ OPMOYYPNyAVY�VVyV�/YYV lYNOrvaNPVYJNY �j l N /VOOaJVOIiUp VlOMYOYOYVOlOOiOMSOP►VOVONVO /Y 4 — rM PPOJyNlPww44i ai ourrwwrywwx.�a aPaMrYPYP4y ys isg e,n l�►Z «i Z;Zl r?AnZlM wl Y YwVUY ...=ZZ 0 . h �• +r rid n s n r KrN � nv n i tinn �N r a i I E n C 1 K � t N Y YwVUY ...=ZZ 0 . h �• +r tt°Y•JL I i r a i I E e6 r• Z. w5:"ovT'r,n„°.CrnYSMPP < nS �r yF `I'w/i rS 8Ii I6w Iy TP1NM0 .Zw! } T \ran M..`TVf <i �'r Y i Fn9Fa O OT y �T O �rrirwr .5C :�3ww3F f: i 3 It9nInFrIA„nrrr +�T r'n .T•r �nrt i. �c cs °N�r/n"m r'� 1•..�p� errNN :r in°n a..axz o twrn.�t N N,z,Ty ayypp riyr orwTT y ^�� ac yyY rn KP. 01'^..n 0 }O tOnn y ti NaNN NP Zrxn» , aL} N 0O p 2 �N < VInww �a a +: ei• tve npLnK ` T J rON l P T €a" TN Z 1 A N�VaOTZ NN w'sN' 1 V" I11 NKO T't•'NYr I °O n Znr$ µn ia�;n T ,4�M Z nCi j• TOO �i a� yN N tYyr Cn r n � nTnn r"Fn e'n r:n NnnnnnnnnaMln HS a I`-rP aNas is P a Tn ;amavaiesovr pN a S M J"•m MN •M M TT�wnTwnnOw r i S AN tMNpVxiM MMw 10/. O 1 CryO 1 N NNNNNNNNNNNNNI.y Y 4NNNNNNYNMNNNMNNM I( OOp0000000000p000= ^,0�0000`O�O�O��(•.� y NNNNNNrrrrrrrrrrr r r r I i N�yNMOaaaaaa•I +aaPPPPPOOppp�rrYyyryyyN paPrPMlyNrOaVrPVlYNrOaPrPP +y.V r00 IP v aY ra T o ...e.....p : ssrur +f os +v +......•..�..... > VpV YON+ ON pNP +•y VONNYV + +pPa .p r.pY NN pPfpN:r Iy P V VpVMOYYPp.Vi/OMY MIO pyYOYpOPMyMMrVYpgOV1LP i• _ 5 i i� �' V4VOr MPP�VOVJVOP MMVPOVwV P •w.l � I- a�y VPNPryPpM \YNpNMOrYPr OPMVp VP •MlNPVO YMfrJO Y pVYYVp rOwNIPJO Y j ly Y P N y 1 y'. n�C��LIM1M1M1P:oroa» S>s 1. D la.arAN i >w...- L n � i IT y` f�LtM ^af1SeI1<>la Sce �o . ° <TM1 °olio. M1p ^Pg � nA <N'•M1>nmT\AI 3> a o0 or.ITao <a n- ::O; m. r n w i oznaai zT zr >TaTf� 1" Isl ..0 O.2i •2..v Tyye PCrwaoaw CSSL>�•T Y � = z � y w H »I�AaC. Oa T11k O SPD T . _� r NONS�n rV w1r $wnNac Pn.°aT + z N a � � T: >TV y.N.Nmi�i� p} »STr �.>.1 Mr.$TyTae V°AlwlTTi m >< m > cn v1Ai•n N Esc a y>swo>Aa .S. T.S.A a�iTNi.•< n�nTaos� �IM1 iOUwwOTTr= rawaeTto >M y2 ]. aV Ts"[.nOa OC »_Vwr "1191 O^9�1P >y2Mp ^�,Jr'is VP e o O ° ;.. 7. ' arr >9 >TOCPinOaS s' N r Cp 2 M1 M1 ; V YiTN20QV =0TNTwNapT T�N�Tr O � m � T 2 1 }�, M1Tr aTN T C y �o� zrrT S-1 � NSi4 m STTr za >Nr aiw % .+ � a C iN �1 >yT2•C•.•O >OS � 1� �✓, p POtOOAlST1 y p- N y 33UH F T I w in 1pp YVC r.•O Iw 000 S • • }T•>il �A fw .n• SO sa w�iaag � "'e InM a�sq w � : : u: i °r 6 D V nZI�M .Si < m O p • C V(� nw2 ~!10 `Y w A <V(fOH S Nr1'1 T� RI O 2 1.1 A / 1 IY. YSmryaTw n �T wfIT 0 a if i N2YTN 9 �� a TSIIray N ~ O 1 D a D2 v _T O D D A 1 n. P ay N O w wT °yY Y N Pr N VwF •i3O ... < } ✓ N y m M MV M1 �P N VNP {\ 1 O - 1 y NyNwy0000000000000000000000000000ppO000M 1 1 1 �� fl �MNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNMNNYNpNNNCNUNNNrMr >w }Yy.N.�jPVPgJ: •.Y pfyyrOOPV N- ;;33095p02•M.°.yPSVV iIt 1°. 1 > VPOSONPONMNlYpyp�.py� OPJOyI NOPOn..10 C0 GG ♦ N�WOOOPO O N 4 pPp .Nj ;j Y yrO��000y0iNOYNOPOPr p OOVpOOPy ,p NI p y p O �� O } L 1 TS N-..I N S P y Y _Nn =.. .. s> a u NP ^w o.�au z �� nr rrir °TT �r0 (�� ns O N O Mr Srrn ••IJP n nnS N n >a nOAn nrA n nA nnn fl0` Cnlnn ? PM_r y~ T O a71 .OP TT rAi. mT � =r2 TDST TTT Tr WONT 1 j DD A Ca ay D a P ATa D1 aDa yy^ V �a ? ••rP” Or°n r n 9 T M N N 1 NyNNNNyy4NNyNyNNNNNNNN44NN4NNNN4N4NNN4NN IL ° N° NNOOOOOOOOOOOOy000yO (IONN00000000000000 1> Y r YYUN.INYUN NIV 4II NNNN±N+NMNNNNN a 222 PPPPPPPPPPNMPMMPPPMNJJJ +f +YYYV 1 O pP +YNVOdNyPN +VNV4dO..P Pf PNr O.pP r�MJYyrO -0PrP 1� C 1L > Y ?f S NMr Nrr r J r .I d..r YI� P$' N N S dOO�Or -0HdOrdYp PPP O.P. •�ONrPOrVNNWP JPVOOfPOrd �`. N °auNaP +rr 'OONONPf OpNf Y000dpuOO .IO..IfMO -0OJJ +OOJrOMONO I~ d00.' OD4JOOr +NOMrV000PN +OVV.100dP0000PC 000 1 4 •_ - 3 7 �< d�i �( P. Yr MM�V�4llp4yfNf arsr�VMNMOI OIPNrO�pP lrVOrPVVOyJPVYdrNp rrZZ�D.�r Y.N.M P�MrUf pr +MMNP pOYwOMPMP 1> N IK Y ri aw }rwMN292 >pTnnw w..N t.o>n rnM fOfO Yo =�'ya}fil=l�.Si flrrPrlP �S"Fe6�PpO nn } }YrY A. rTN 3s:i +�TwON >C��CI°`E CnL Of'I ?p r T1>_n_DT N ppTy A PN SIA>P SN M� OrrNpiiOlw T �Srpn�rw��NArrr 1 j 030SC >�Y flrrr> D CnM .tti �1 I� r Iiii. NnnNr O P rpmA (� J ppY ? }w_ y OnCR Mrp9i M NTr P � qY PO IN' } >rY i•°[ n n n rA1}iN niZ' �°' � >f^ i VaOi>AnNxoCi8 T0 r > 1 T r°°. M r ."nP > ..A>w n.I2 n«oeiw s i :i «V - 2} rn L9 ? s a aNza o ? .- OIF i PD i vz- n „ i ngTn Nz n a n ^Ow N QS TS N-..I N S P y Y _Nn =.. .. s> a u NP ^w o.�au z �� nr rrir °TT �r0 (�� ns O N O Mr Srrn ••IJP n nnS N n >a nOAn nrA n nA nnn fl0` Cnlnn ? PM_r y~ T O a71 .OP TT rAi. mT � =r2 TDST TTT Tr WONT 1 j DD A Ca ay D a P ATa D1 aDa yy^ V �a ? ••rP” Or°n r n 9 T M N N 1 NyNNNNyy4NNyNyNNNNNNNN44NN4NNNN4N4NNN4NN IL ° N° NNOOOOOOOOOOOOy000yO (IONN00000000000000 1> Y r YYUN.INYUN NIV 4II NNNN±N+NMNNNNN a 222 PPPPPPPPPPNMPMMPPPMNJJJ +f +YYYV 1 O pP +YNVOdNyPN +VNV4dO..P Pf PNr O.pP r�MJYyrO -0PrP 1� C 1L > Y ?f S NMr Nrr r J r .I d..r YI� P$' N N S dOO�Or -0HdOrdYp PPP O.P. •�ONrPOrVNNWP JPVOOfPOrd �`. N °auNaP +rr 'OONONPf OpNf Y000dpuOO .IO..IfMO -0OJJ +OOJrOMONO I~ d00.' OD4JOOr +NOMrV000PN +OVV.100dP0000PC 000 1 4 •_ - 3 7 �< d�i �( li�YtiYYY�1.V.y iJyY MV CIO MwPi VNMVMiVNVNiS P�IM1 M1.1J 1 N NJH YSrM�, aO. IP�PNN IPPNO�POPVVVYMiPMV ►NNMOPF_Ii�Y pV N OF rP.4w ' 1 TTMMT Nt+.�OMNOTNNM>N9lF;e�YTa�gaTgYq 00 ZTt.i IT' �.^. . rp Fl - .PaNw.. 1.1 Zfiw LOy1 pDm3 �ZgpmTT 1 y0N222wT�mi _00 a pnyZOr N .�>Tmmm AnmMnnNiNpmmm2 yN.wTN�s mTN9T� NDNN> M 1 N OMwy N...(wD a PPTON> OZZZ i !TO 09 T• Ny iOw 11 r PM` r_imr T P Z }Om ..(( OiM PmmY9>� n1'•Clylm nwP 1FS NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNN4NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN T Op In PPPF�C9T1�SaPCZ 9NOF ^p rC mTtpnnp�TpYN nP r.��STOpSTOO:IP� >TTO waT>M � T rNYa nYNV N�O C f SY L °9r °a "IS NOOOOAPYy -Ni 00000000 11�� t Y.°s «osY yN�i >o a£n zM JPPI VIyVOiO�.pNlyMVOiP�.P NIVN�OiPYP PlyNV0i0M o T t%-" 444 �s is i12$ Y Z 1 foie �w 1 n r 1 ZZ '� •n e K n i .0..0..0. r oeo ^o N « 1 rP M N IA T a n +su«Cw °m svuiPrrP.riaawvv vi ni��wlN.�a «�wa o�r -Niv NNiw n- roa r>« nnno «onNP ii�ey��N4 m � > .-ONO N nprr nnnnn n O-.�un y;i MQN =Y O HVD SP •S •� M �L9 s to ZVo !' s v i e 1 a N 1 N r 1 b « ; Y PAD.> -�J AYPA A 0 A(1N Ar MTN P 9 pV N OF rP.4w ' 1 Yr YY r n O�fCN n4 '� d • 1 y s Mww NVNw N q Mfay N N0 ; f NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNN4NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 1 G^� rVyVrVyyVyVrVVVriioeee07iaaaaao IL 11p fl "IS NOOOOAPYy -Ni 00000000 11�� JPPI VIyVOiO�.pNlyMVOiP�.P NIVN�OiPYP PlyNV0i0M ;� Z 1 n 1 � rP M N IA T +su«Cw °m svuiPrrP.riaawvv vi ni��wlN.�a «�wa o�r -Niv NNiw ;il o..P rorrory Nyw Punru Moao� ;� Y a'o=. 'ne stirN.rPNPONOggaoN rrb NNgeNONa SIii �o$arloor 1 a JO O.YlyNly�lf NypVYN 1 M �� 1. .IIM jJrylIONJVYYy 1•T • }��- yy PYpMJyYVPPMd TAN . .IJY i C D NTD++iVTnp�yyN +yy >D/r•�My % \aaf ylwNy rll � ".0 Dr9y�mrlN pin Til 1 ^x pp� Crq�TT >.C�TDy�9L 1 y �i1NxTr NTD�VS TANNM a x^9TMM �iNN ; w .•r1 DND f� O D 1 N v O i C 1 n 1 ry yS OTn (�C mTCw Cw ayT[r[��A V•yy�� 9CXTOY- SL >9�O4wf� �y >yNy vNiDVT >T a +q�• >s nuNeNr a saawz�Nron +yxDSNv eTrn e.. T yrir<» eszNZrz y- 1 - zn��Nrx�NyTyny � 1 wAq TT NS�yNgnwVi- a is .iy M n�M N N 1 r � r C60 T fl xN I a II T I11 S 2 1 „ A N = cSO �W00000000000000o IY Y ��YYNwYUYUUUUUU is s NNNwwwNrr a o :uNro�p +PgJUwroao ,q � > c Ic eu oNO P m NOpSrYplppO Y�.NgM qpq pN S J M wpOOi �irOSpSPOOMO �y r ■ i 1 yPVJ.P bpP�plM}pYNYPP�YYPyPrPPp I} ` NdrNVYaprNVPOOdPP «OPOayOaVPNVVOJ•A rNii 1> w�nra Yi�nN2a�iraS�zz�«wr rrr 1m ,Y � KT> a n >r NA ES y� MYNQcnEmwwo��e >o2(a}'o_op�po °0 ►mss i gMA aO4 w2 p °.pfSr9OOSC^ I:4 »r Zf�m S nNF4yw>} i-I:no Ct na.2..z. °Tb �eri$2 }�� ° >Ar Tani : r f^ pv. (�L ONY »SmY ESTm An0 OP 1 > 111 °rOS �OM A••ry paFri /{n NPCY O \YSY }}^{ 2( S IIICn OOpSTZN OmrNTfn HxpA t O O r�yMm> MV ��r TD P9NCr NT M1 a Or n f}v OM1 = �Irlyn CS M• n^ •� N �n S p N=AD Ir Of 2 n N < rlOiN PSO of N ON SA q pp T A rr T^• p Q>9 niT pZ • r �P � Ei Lr PNt ns t n n i ICi1r S�fSNTy gCM1N mnS T': 1°il`i.N.Tn7:2�� >O<! O ^p ^pPm TITiI °w ^T^Z ;OM aCj SE'w!•nmN FYTVrNaw pm pm� Oynn !y R'TTa�m[}y1''rf ^.O °O }r��2� ~rNpTOTY ^MNy d r MDG mlll y ^ } >rr9 a 1 N>.(O 9m YJ Nf Y Vr IS neYyE/a�yy yT YYS OIV rCC rTSnm9 ��.1 C w0}>ryOry TOOyOM2Yr YO zz 8 rTas M�T�v ;yly Y �yOd'g /2�T _ ru•NiT YTT rINYf T� y+O1TY Is i f� y TIANTmVMrP yrCNN } _ �r �L VI<} n C 9i C•^i npr TCCw yZ nN N m i q0 Zr O•I yTf � N r > 111 hl nn n nnY IN.. n.«. IN..N•1 nn n n � Oy ° yOa r y O•°r rr °° as s as �' iS S:^ mml 12.1 I « A zz AP a a wN N MN N NN � p N NNNNNNNNVNNNMMwNNNNNNMNVNNyNN4NNNNNVNN 'S ��V��Op00y 000000 000000000000000000000° IT. P PPP ►pyPPp�' MgMVVVVVVVVVVVUyV VI�VV yV 1a9 NIVNrOdp Yp M.>VNrpabYP p }yyrpap�IP M��N•vi0 ± =: =M I• I ° p p} Pa « PPaYMPOJN8lJMarOlOeypdYYby.NpNJ ,gat I* IF ISOVO« «pvPPaNOy = rl.YpdaOMJyN04p *pypP 00 {NIPSOwy p.QppO PPOO IY PM♦.pyN000PP000 G O !O Iw Oi� �O jw �N(iSS Ows.YaMYy Oy2 nY C eiA YnnNO n2N 1T Y> het yw44 -➢ ' py DNS _y 4nCT T� 1.1M mwa. y } T O< N�awlT a Q y w OrG m R\\�Ti PG ^Ir N TR mlTw pQWd M4MPy.J O1Nwy.d4YpVyOyb ybyb«MU..N P-w1Y rYOYpYYOIMPb 1 N�•�, �t'e . NOWPpMIYyy.PiM JypNNJO�pYPdVMNPYMJPW� }yO�DWyy Iy 1 IK ItiJ Ff Ag90 \9999700 O Lt TrL rnLNNT.)TOyyTmnYp �Imi1 6 NS� syoo < n+rm� m tcn nrnahtii. =r szslz...r+o w'1° I'.°.r .SiY �oo ii 1 y C�s>NT- sy.. ela NTrmw TTymn Y am�T9ma °iiF >�K or�nrz"'Fri- •)i.ae Fp NIw DN p j w , mONy wl...yS1Mjn9Yf�y ZZnNYnYT9 >a� r>C ben �w OI aNZ FmnFy j[�O NT M.{ n T2� '>'I»• 1 « . y /�C O 7NnN Q 4 C S`nON..1 C(�yn N >OA r f�MR PZr Y<mOf9 1205 n�6mw i'ZO 1 O >N» CAC pO N1i. +n T4 p.c DSnn.TwR n1nn EPn i 1 71 2-l�9y T» Cn1 j° RI. N'a +wRCY�y�MnmwmiyOf�1°ji. P NIYNrOd S.iP YMOdb.IP .IYy WIU.. »�db -IP MJV4wOJOyP N Sa nmT O 1 J ei .'IN O AS::Nye ern G5�".j. csN F +w+i r��IOVr Y.N.v yMJPYi N..w irirrdNOgpOOpPltlJ F .a..°. a° .^.S j )co Nee. » rynv aiN� von ^ 8 ^� � a 11 m olw9saNjwi 9«NN7TA2)m n QNd «yNnl.a« o`) 6��m: 1 1 ymryrr� oowmmr o4gTY o o>mo JT 7wwncmw ri �. P{T �ma �:azwmN�.� mw. zTT =��iT yr it »w.+i p zp yzw N =a9< < e Dz «Cy ioo�MAa �sb � � \�°a 9cwusiw� rj� 1 IN ly 'j^ =^ TN 111nr ny Y� S' Iw Oi� �O jw �N(iSS Ows.YaMYy Oy2 nY C eiA YnnNO n2N 1T Y> het -�C°A YMYS SOT y °1rn � �° yNwIm YO r py DNS _y 4nCT T� 1.1M mwa. y } T O< N�awlT a Q y w OrG m R\\�Ti PG ^Ir N TR mlTw .2.. Inw N mp ��pp Z2 NZ Ma ICMAa�Mw OT aN s PIJ LOm � as y m NNNNNYYNNNw NNNNNYYYNNNNNNYNNYNNNYNYYNN 00_ OOOOApOOLn00000.I000�00000000000000000000 NNN I r�H ��UI�GMjy�00JdJJddJddVbyVbObbObbPy P NIYNrOd S.iP YMOdb.IP .IYy WIU.. »�db -IP MJV4wOJOyP � Y J ei +w+i r��IOVr Y.N.v yMJPYi N..w irirrdNOgpOOpPltlJ pp� vYrnOYgNr .N.NMwN.w r4.>i IN. J.N pbpM_ _d J'.'NMW_ q_ Orw. Y_ MPJ.iNpPPp BooPd..oybJ.ioo P co Nau+lo - - - i�'I oiwarMggg <uw �oog +P JOP$o$8:o8uorSo . dq NJOB n C ^n bY S S > Y T a m i + N i 4 4 -p^r Y A' e!' j 'JT PoaN Nse.= /a�:/_/r�yuyyY+:sYPU ViO r i /i ,�� '� •�' IrP r�pY NPVrrrPPPrrrYOPPSVPY MiPVYNOVNMPMPOOI P�YVrrNVNMN ✓P 9 1y'O� r °� ' i TT ;IM ;� ;LMCCrrrrNNNMNM} NNNM �� O ��^�yDNruuaiT�WE�gy_°e1y( °�1rarsn � , • Oft. ��S T� Y NaC^OOrA��/nTY�YCTAyai r NI O]e >p.. xff11>l r2Sii>O�f/O ST {/M ,!fit ZET >ON NOT �r>T / i /wi.� wwrn> r is wNir..r..r. Tlfi tsc AYw >i'r« oizaaeoai$�µsTa i a `y'"i r'io �$T >r «zn 1p ywyyTynar i O Sialii '+y �.y y�.yYYY NTwTT fV Mf y C>NnnN NP aT yp ^ j /Vn O Op/IN.1 Y� _O OA 1 .i 7^ r f1 �NVNww 00 N i yiii� r k v a r > 70n Visas 1 "v �l sfs «« v w��« zia�Py♦ sPw >« «/nino8o n/s o r��s �.>.ouw°iaz ia�� z rr�zG zrn r..yr }o r//1 �.f s..r i • fVr 1YC�YinrY1� «PV rN Y xYZI�rMN > 4rrTDNrO« YYY ♦MNP it PO rsNNSP ONn «r <rw \a >.iTC��.n IP ! 1 i' ' OrDaAT IS Y.wryNC� ;Nr� y a Pry ser •i c «YYiiY c TnTya °owii�n� P /^ / .7Q�wn _ V.Pr T iZ P. 1i/ ri w OTN 'A> 9 yTOM r <Pr w `e « N N S Nw^ i ac pw C A4 O a ry'C' < O wM N M NO f119 N1'IA MA Ea..P r!a i }J x n z U z asses ss a P TV T 4U M�.M44YMMNMNNNYMN NUNNN N4 °Y.iDiiii oo�io ooQiiiii li �C1 ♦slls ii i i £ j IVMr SHIP rPPNVNY 0.p6 rPP�lYi/NrOiPr 1�a 1� i 1{ O > NN ; Y PV Pr M Yr N 1A f N P low p yy yyyy VOVP./OPP.ONiPOPPSjPIPdPONNOr NMNPp `A T 2 p p I. ✓ POy00JP.00./NP 1I y Ir , OOOVOOPOPP JOrOOP if p FC I` {� r } 1 ■ � � | | 22 |■ � ■ a9| qR %_ � _| ,.... / ' \ | itl Y.-� x jFE= | HH51 q | | =am a � { . _ � |its ! ■| , ��f ! g &�� ■�| i!` ■� |; § |;; §§ ;; ;§ |'§ - � \i | . ; § ;mp r � °� .� S9dF��EH�T .�O�O�G7L��S�9�03tS7�.�79 �n4i��i9�orfiic� P.3• p�(� Q //��{{j�jjj �]]ij� jai pp= qqi■ p gqqg Q a ppp `pp �s � : � � y .',`.nE q��a �fi ii1 ��C��g1��A��Q �;��I�:A ■ ^R; �q � '.Y. aBEF!Qgga �_� apa�g�e E a p BE'F a MAX) OPIP �MEaI'ia�aii #gi# aisia a ssfsassssfsstsfssarfassfsfssssss ssesessss as �v go >3lsa fssii' aa__' siiiaaiiiii� # # # #iipal3a�ilp'eiiia #i'sa` if" not ssssfs :sf _sfasffsss 228 $e� sassssssssssftssssssssa ss r►�r+rr:�r +r rr Hyr�r�� /rte +r rrrr rrrrr +rr +r r a, 19 �E31236i§ iiSl�'. s'' sbili 6.[0$�ilfiiii�iiiS1�! §6�l�i�i�i I gavial 99 gig I BigiiiiiiaaF6a:i6&66a $ ias'a ~ p$ - r rr -airs rrgr rrrirrrrrrrrtrr rr t =_ aaSUE § ails agig igayt < =u'isafiet�sa6ssash §eaa4sa oa ss #saifii #p'sp #_'ataiiL # # #s# #si_ # a#fg#wait aaa1 E22# iaa###z # # gg#E E # # ssssa sipsisknpep#p3p sweat ssssassaf s9e88_3 # s#:sssrg ta ##s :i? ai s a iafifi5ggifiSE6f8aCa£Bot4'e ifi4q= a'aCasca:c @33Be4�a as t4 w; =a I H NI ITO�� i# sa' sasiaa.{ #raiaiiasaa'srsiaapassi � a�aaissi'rsY� �� p9 x saasisisisiisiaasisisiiasssss r sssssssisi S p s' aag� fiiaiis�sas #giai3aaaais£iapsaaB asaa's's'sisli p. a■ sisssisss�sisysiaiiasiisiasasis y ssssssasais rrrrr rrrrr rrrrrnrrr rrrr rrrrr rr� §iilII� lEt639ti7 §9iY3in�il+t59iEllY!< 1999713 §n!§ S� r. rr��rrnr. r- rr��r�rr.r rr�r r rrrrr +rrry^ Y glossal e5191 931 swag 9 91 1 a §99 vii; as . 'Ma 33 =g333G49'BG��rta��'ka 3 3 rbo §n§ D� �Eiaiaisasipaaiiaaaaisiaaaaaai ?E aiaatiaa_'sitii sssasasasssssssssssssssassssss s ssss :sssxss SSSri �S i ii �9 a MIN S� s � 'c �s6c595�L8c8r9a3 =_ES$siiaa8s9& o 283U.Y59ti:t!f 11 .. 1 IS A �cE�5aEG6 s.. a sc..s i ■g5�a�s�i6ii� i�� i� ss �r OR Will 111P IMP E gs eag s€ gg gg E'c = &= aggg g ggg Sa' 9g .`� q �iisiai} sis3pipi2api =giaaisa_'s_'sa�a�_'si2ai�ai ��: # # #t3 # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##3283 #t#za 9 y ssssssssss asssasassssassasssasssssssssaassss �2siise5' ss'' sa�asplippip2�aatiaiaaaa _3_'s5iii� =_'s5�• � 3 #22 # ## 222 #3 #22 #i2 # # #23 #333133333333 #3333D2 -r �, aC�: a s: ssassssasssssssassssssssssssnsssssssssssss rrrrrrrr -r r�rr�rrr PPrrYf �r ±rrrrr��rF�r:� g 995999916 flag Ise 3f6'a32e3 ai33iC19933gili U 9999 Egg 51335ggia9 f6692 a @:ia' :-iE6gig 99_ a� 6 5ir'.3am91 963= .aif EEEne33f032 3i- E 39g36 ai p ' sS' aa'' afias3Gisiaflp' ssaaip ; "spas�a5iaiajs ;2a'asa�52 2 1 1111131 #13 #11 #131333313 #3i 313133# #2321 #33v�r a a ss=$ ssssssssssssassssssasssss ==ssa=akasssas:s P R Nail iiiliI s• c £ asaEaca54C6��!! &:48H8p�E�sEE5co8sSE'syidaSiaa. i�° _. i E7 F 0 s 9 y g 3 MIN T y'Y ✓. 'y6 All '�1l 9 1 RUN III I if a t caai as i$si a asa a s p aa a asn a sssa 9 ass a s Q 6 �tf�I 912 9 1 3 a as rrr r r 'r` a s IS a 3aaa tl31 9 s e� .. Sr r rrr r a t $aas: E ji �jsEs a apt i!3 1 I s n a asnn'pnss a ass n a 2 C as ��i33� as sa■ U siii III d E E 1438 9 Vail 5 3!8 a_ �a a} a rf s L 7, � s a a PER M �a $ va _ an !o� 5 ■ a� A i 7e 3 . | | � | 4 §$N�e��s� |��e� @�■ � | | [ |q��N�| \ ■ ■�� ■ | | ■ ■ | |�� | |� || ' ■� |' :sz x | to 9 a t | | q | � \� , | a . . | . ' 2 x \ 1§ / � ( ]3� \ ■ \ �J • , | |� ■: : §� .■ \ | / »\ � � Fljo | -� «ƒ � \ / rpre !; \© # & | | 2 | if | § ! a f = i t 140 c Py.._- A7NKJIpr1 80f Ai00001K fiVlikM OCW62tu r AkM.k irr..r C...a 8A! 8IDLL80ID0 lMu.. =16 M t. trrtw a ttcwsku A..W p U...Aw . •4 Ort ...' !m L trOnC.af.pin Ap61.1 •A• L.� 34" Conn rA11n TO � ❑brw.6lnM ��. Ob.. �....— .....1..yr N.. s KWA Of AM110AraM Or. Nn,... COMWIMCt f70ixf 27WWAM 1 TMW OF TZMd4CnnKM re M Im ORIOMt ! 100.00 20 At00AL M 28.00 CT d0 a r4...18.t.r am f 00 1LLEM! 1I.mM.0l.+w -Niw .4 ft" T""l z6p .j o! C. A..r rn. /, n702 - d.•L•.r�Y —tlnr n. MrCLL 2 Cuerr86. Ck. !1770 Al! 1201-2624A6 - !Cwt �� 7 fAV llTaAl M MAt 8 ue.o0 ,� ..� r r �. rr..... ,... w .. +�.• r.... r .+............Y.... •Y ..w e w r r r ... �.� � .•• .� ..4 1�•I a .• .��• ..tl..• �� . r •n.•Y..rr r Y.... M .4 ..• wl.w•• . M .. ..w ..r...rr r... r.r.r ...w. r.r.Y.r ...r. +...r .........w w .,. w rr.. r r . rr r..r..r� Y r. .. r ...�•.�.•...:�r.�.�.. w • ..`� .. w r .+.. w ..+.... ...n. s.•...r. rr.r. rrr.r r....r r... rr�.��r.r .r... v. it a Mu wn r . 6r0u -- . A"LxAnon w 7[ANsmot li STAR OF CIJd00.A C..r ♦ -_D..— . +. �... ....... r.r .r.. r..r.. ...Yr w.r. Y.... ...r ..rte ..�.•J.•..Yw•.`r.Yw, {w.. •.Ia ./..../.�. ..I.rY ±w +..•r..•�•M.�w.W ... u••r.r.rr....�rrr. ........Y r.......Y . r�•. w...�r..w�.. r....w .. �r.r r.r. r..n. �..�... ..w..w.�..ro- M NO M,0. SA. M Lt., M Drpnlv.t 0. 0.4 A..W p U...Aw . •4 0 ra.o.rf+.. Conn rA11n � ❑brw.6lnM ��. Ob.. �....— .....1..yr N.. o� VfgC"T N LEMc v AVE. VA CAAJ7— Val e-AA/T STOP -H -GO MARKETS NATIONAL CONVENIENCE STORES INC. Located: Haven Avenue 145 feat south of Lemon Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA Propwrty la currently Zoned: NEIGHBORHOOD COHNERCIAL Zoning of adjacent property is: North: Neighborhocd Commercial and Medium Density Residential South: Of Lice Professional East: Neighborhood Commercial West: Low Density Residential AeN 201- 262 -046 By: R. Alcorn 12/30/87 Y., VAGA"J 1 1 a; w Z _' i A Owrr d AWb ft iwo frd lm brd.w no" rw i Mwgy OF M1ut WM ant Lou Au Itltl M •Mrr UL 24" p n.r..a.. � x tltm a UANLW CKy M ... ,. ,.. rwwr .. r for wN w • ,iw.l p-dW"Pfi tl lib+ Y ''O�NYpIYrrY t_.... w.+..rtMrY�nWwIrdIYr,W wr..rrrr.•r dM•..—dy Nsb•. r...w C.rY .•6 11 7111/ a C4plM IrI Y �+• !rlra CA L+.L �w � b.Y +r.. �.tlr r✓vrr,errtlrr.r..rrrrrr. ..t.Vr.r Yr. rrrh+,.•...r.. yrlr... `rti.. .ryr'�...- •� r w �� w r rte.: �� .w.' ' tlrrrrrir.rr: u r =./�%• .r lrr tl..r....w 'r w.,..tltlw.r� -.r "...`..r. r � LY.•...w.1rlr.r rrr.. n.�.,,11 r.... r..ww...r..r I. w r wrr rrn. r. w ....0 M r.r r...r . r ,�..� r'+y •yr it • �' AMINCAT M t'. MANPWAW Is Lilli a CAUPOW. •r .r. r r., r � .r. +..r. �. tlr.....w r w ltl ,w l r r� .......r. w r r.. ,�.. r . r Y"r.r�'w' rrr y .r1 . r r rrr.r.r ..r...y a r r ...•. rr w • .�.. V .w,14 r . •.w ... r .rr. r• i,v1 w II � I r ,y��, w IrI. y.�r`r r....tl .. ..r•,I...•....r...lr.r r.rwrr- w.r..... Ir.r .. r .r r rr... �11r w.w 1 r. �.r�, Y 1.�•tl�rr •r,.r Yrlw.,rl Wtl r•r.r tl .. Y.YrM rniY ...._�.. +�,.r++�rr ter. gNiy C•Y DI No wawx br flb L/rt iwLlrr• Vr o* ro. LEI s. NYa" ❑ 4wN..� l .r N, •� • Yr 23 -- - - rt � 1 �T� W ...._�.. +�,.r++�rr ter. gNiy C•Y DI No wawx br flb L/rt iwLlrr• Vr o* ro. LEI s. NYa" ❑ 4wN..� l .r N, •� • Yr 23 -- - - z c w z a V F710 - F'S 730 I MIt 8790 87Sz w '3 dw o• 8785E 197N STREET N THE VOHS GROCERY CO. Located: 8778 19th St. Rancho Cucamonga cA Property is currently Zoned: - NEIGHDORHOOD CONHERCIAL Zoning of adjacent property: North: Preevay RSyht -ef -Way (Vacant) South: Neighborhood Commercial w� East: Nedium -High Residential West: Neighborhood Commercial APH 201- 221 -45 Hy: R. Alcori 12/30/87 �,•; ou S 8790 87Sz w '3 dw o• 8785E 197N STREET N THE VOHS GROCERY CO. Located: 8778 19th St. Rancho Cucamonga cA Property is currently Zoned: - NEIGHDORHOOD CONHERCIAL Zoning of adjacent property: North: Preevay RSyht -ef -Way (Vacant) South: Neighborhood Commercial w� East: Nedium -High Residential West: Neighborhood Commercial APH 201- 221 -45 Hy: R. Alcori 12/30/87 �,•; ou S IRI Y.&, .__. •Cwl "Als -- 3an ",m,,dtno Oft S1L6 CC/SML 3 HAMM at AWXwm ro 3939 renal! •wd. A 1 iirt.oc ii rcr IL vanpCUfCO1a v+r w •��r�..� r..wr�.V `�. �".r r�.V...~i.~. ♦rnpMryy+Irti r.r rrrrrwr Ia .l.L(atR 144 1m1 .�N 1a.tiU. cmlo—. a rwb 11 Stan p G410Ma APPUCAiMiM Sly r[4MA40SS, f.1'w Son M[ns[alro 12-14-67 ` .r... .�".r"...:'.".�•w.r..�r +4. �� rte.. �..�•r- .......... rr.. r�r�r.y w..rw •..an�.rr+r r.�._..�r.r a 1�.1n wO..arp w r ry cw w+r SAM Mrrly 4y r. Ill rr V. 0.4 L7 r�,s.rrww _ aE, F L ._ --I - - - -wl�- . _ •�k . -- 0 T LU Z } FooTHILL BLVD. �Q�1.LL 89 19 �UDA. 895,5, V1q6Ar4 -r IN OUT RED BILL LIQUOR Located: 8939 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Property is currently Zoned: FOOTHILL SPECIFIC PLAN Subarea #2- Community Commercial Zoning of adjacent property is: North: Y.S.P. Opecill Commercial South: P.S.P. Medium High Residential East: F.S.P. Community Commercial West: P.S.P. Community Commercial APH 208 - 192 -07 By: R. Alcorn 12/30/87 a(o w - 'f tea'•''*! .y 3w :•� �4 1 C t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 �1 'aw TO: City Council and City Manager I1 1�'65 FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF LEASE FOR RENTAL OF CFTY PROPERTY AY 111 M. GROVE. W1MU.-7MFWIK- The City Council approve modification of the current lease agreement by dropping the restriction of no children over three years of age allowed to reside on the property and authorize the Mayor to sign the new lease. BACKGROUND: The City currently leases, on a month -to -month basis, the house located on City property at 111 M. Grove, Upland, California, to City employee Ernest Ruiz. The original lease does not allow childran over the age of three years to reside in the house. The reason for the restriction of no children over the age of three was to protect the City from general liability exposure. Wfth all the vehicle traffic and the tools, equipment and chemicals stored to the maintenance yard, if a small child were able to walk into the maintenance yard there could be a serious accident. Since the new maintenance yard has been built, the majority of activity relating to maintenance functions has shifted to the new maintenance yard. There is still some vehicle traffic at the old maintenance yard, however, tats Is mostly limited to refueling of City vehicles. Ernest Ruiz has contacted me regarding the restriction of 'no children over threo', as he has a daughter who will be three in February 1988. He has asked for a determination by the City on whether he should plan to move or whether the restriction can be lifted due to the new maintenance facility Seing completed. Since the activity at the old maintenance yard is very low and the tools, equipment and chemicals have been moved to the new maintenance yard, staff feels the restriction regarding no children over the age of three can be lifted. If the City Council agrees, Mr. Ruiz will be asked to execute a new lease dropping the restriction and heavily cautioned about proper supervision of the child so she 1s not allowed to play in the old maintenance yard area. 17m- Jim Hart Administrative Services Director Z7 t- ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Jenuary 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: SURPLUS PROPERTY RECONEIOATION• City Council declare as surplus pr > >erty and authorize the sale of three. (3) Nang workstations. BACKGROUND: The conversion of the Finance Division accounting system has begun with the arrival of three (3) IBM PC's. No longer needed for the finance application are three (3) Mang workstations. Staff has been advised that the resale value or these workstations is quite good when sold fndividual.y rather than as a systemwide unit. Identifying numbers are as follows: Tag Humber Model Number Serial Number 203 2336 7350 213 2336 8246 259 2336 7371 Respectfully submitted. Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:ES:cv s STAFF REPORT V DATE: January 6, 1500 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEMBER ON THE CALIFORNIA MWICIPAL ZIOMWL MWITTtlBYOS Er DIPMUTOPM RECOMENDATIOM: City Council adopt the attached Resolution naming Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director, as alternate representative on the Board of Directors, of the California Municipal Insurance Authority. -" BACKGROUND: In May, 1986, the City became a member of the California Municipal Insurance Authority (CHIA) for general liability coverage. I was appointed as the representative or. the CHIA Board of Directors to represent the City. The CHIA has had difficulty obtaining a Quorum to conduct Board business as many cities appointed elected officials as the Board member. Since the meetings are held in Sacramento during the normal work day hours, it 1s difficult for many City Council members to attend the meetings. As a result, the CHIA has asked each member city to designate an alternate member with the authority to act in the stead of the appointed Board member. Respectfully submitted, Jim Hart ,Haartt Administrative Services Director JH:cv aR +t RESOLUTION NO. 58-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DESIGNATING AN ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OF THE CALIFORNIA M)NICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga ,coined the California Municipal Insurance Authority ithe 'Authority`), for the purpose of obtaining coverage in the Liability Progrim of the Joint Powers Authority; and t ?» WHEREAS, Jim [fart, Administrative Services Director, was designated "r as the City's representative an the Authority Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, the Authority has requested an alternate representative an the Board of Directors be appointed to act in the stead of Jim Hart in his absence. > M. THFREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: SECTI011 l: That this City appoint Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance D ref car, as the alternate representative on the Board of Directors, for the Authority, with full power to act in the stead of Jim Hart. • ` nri L, e, �.&Y. TV s t 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i W" ; DATE: January 6, 198e TO: City Council and City Manager FRDM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director _ BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director f SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF CITY VEHICLE Approve Intergovernmental Service Fund as funding source for replacement "df unit 101. BACKCROUHD: In wavember, 1987, Council was made aware of the necessity to rotate unit 101 to the Disaster Preparedness Coordinator. Staff received approval to proceed with the rotation and replacement of Unit 101, and at this time is requesting Council approval of the IGS Fund as the funding source for replacement. Suffiuient funds are available in the IGS Fund as Unit 101 was scheduled for replacment during this fiscal year. Respectfully submitted. Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:ES:cv �i ,, 2 IT Approve Intergovernmental Service Fund as funding source for replacement "df unit 101. BACKCROUHD: In wavember, 1987, Council was made aware of the necessity to rotate unit 101 to the Disaster Preparedness Coordinator. Staff received approval to proceed with the rotation and replacement of Unit 101, and at this time is requesting Council approval of the IGS Fund as the funding source for replacement. Suffiuient funds are available in the IGS Fund as Unit 101 was scheduled for replacment during this fiscal year. Respectfully submitted. Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:ES:cv �i ,, 2 C , y.- z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT Date: January 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Slane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: Execute Contract Change Order No. 3 to C.O. t87 -20 for Don Greek and Associates for Design Administration Services for the following projects: 19th Street Improvements, Zircon to Ametlott, the Alta Loma Assessment District and the Arrow Route Bridge Widening (Cucamonga Creek) for an additional fea of $9,000.00 being paid from the funds budgeted for eac: respective project. Execute Contract Change Order No. 3 to C,.O. 487 -20 for Design Administration Services for the following projects: 19th Street Improvements - Zircon to Amethyst, tqs Alta Lome Assessment District and fla Arrow Route Bridge Widening ( Cucamonga Creek) The change order covers the continued Design Administrative Services for the Nineteenth Street Improvement Projects, In particular 19th Street from Zircon to Amethyst for an additional expenditure of $2,000 from the Systems Development Fund. An improvement project has now been identified to continue storm drain Improvements within the Alta Loma Assessment Districts and additional expenditure of $2,000 to prepare the R est for Proposals for a new storm drain project from tM Alta Loma Basin to Hermosa Avenue located north of Hillside Road immediately south of The Woods development. Fund shall be expended from the Assessment District. The final item of the change order 1s for the development of the project scheme and preparation of field review and funding applications for the widening of the Arrow Route Bridge at the Cucamonga Creek located west of Vineyard Avenue on Arrow Route. This work shall be funded in the amount of $5,000 from the Systems Fund. Respec l submitted, si c V. , _ . RHH:BWF:pam Attachment 3;L. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Design Administrative Sorviees er .. 12 -7 -e7 Date: TO: Don Greek c Ass,ciates, 2428 N. Grand Ave., Sto. L. Santa Ana, CA 92701 Engineer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. Further services on the following list of projects n Contract price In Contract 1. 19th Street $2,000.00 2. Alta Tom Aaseeemant District 3. Arrow Banta Bridge 2,000.00 5,000.00 TOTAL. $9,000.00 JUblikiCATION Continue workings of the Alta tom Asaesamont District and 19th Street project. Add a new preject for preparation of predesign studies for widening of Arrow Route Bridge at Cucamonga Creek want of Vineyard Avenue The a9ount of the Contract will be (RecwAded) (Increased) by the sua of: Nine Thousand and no /100 rollars ($g,00u.00 The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Fifty Four Thousand and no /loo Dollars (s 54,0 The Contract period provided for completion will be (Increasad) (Decreased) (Unchanged) N/A Days This document will become supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: ? usse gra —urt , ty .nq neer a a Accepted: �O tz�4�87 ng i,ee, __ ate ,i? ?roved: yor, ty o anc o ucamonga ate s oyo e a used as record of any changes-5--5-e--5-rT!-;ina1 engineering jr2izent dated: March 4, 1987 -3$ C.O. e7 -20 r f , �Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r , STAFF REPORT °e'�iy Date: January 6, 1987 x To: City Council and City manager x 'a From: Russell H. Ms9uire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakosht, Associate Civ11 Engineer Subject: Execution of Professional Services Agreement with United Title CoWany to prepare title sports, litigation guarantees, escrow set -ices, etc., for 19th Street Improvement from West City Limits to Jasper Street. The maximum fee is $12,750.00 to be funded from Systems Development Fund. P.ECOmmfItDATIOr: p It is hereby recommended to execute a Professional Services Agreement with United Title CoWaq to prepare title reports, litigation guarantees, escrow services, etc., for 19th Street improvement from West City Limits to Jasper Street. The maximum fee is $12,750.00. MKGROM ANALYSIS• On November 18, 1987, the City Council approved the Award and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Jeffreys and Associates for the Right -of -Nay Services for the Improvement of 19th Street frog West City Limits to Jasper Street. The maximmsm fee was 522,500.00, plus title reports, title, litigation guarantees, escrow services, etc. To provide for such title workings it is proposed to engage United Title Company for the preparation of title re ports, litigation guarantees, escrow services, etc. A maximum cost at $850 00 for each of the 1S parcels involved, of this, $300 is for title reports and $250 for escrow fees. The remainder for litigation guarantees and title insurance. 7 Resp suhmitted, am Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA �cw STAFF REPORT , DATE: January 6, 1988 S TO: City Council and City Manager 19" FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF TREE. MAItirMWE EOOIPIF]R. PERSOA EL PLATFORM. i?1 Ai:7r2LI —T if)IPP The City Council authorize the purchase of the Hi- Ranger model 511 -55 Personnel Platform from Nest Coast Utility Equipment Co., of Fontana, California, in the I amount of $35,987.00. BACKGROUIBI: The current budget includes funis to purchase two trucks to perform tree maintenance functions. One of tht necessary trucks is an aerial truck. This truck consists of two major parts: a 'bucket` and a truck chassis. In researching the availability of a personnel platform or 'bucket' for the aerial truck, it appears one unit that meets the City's needs is fs3ediately available from West Coast Utility Equipment Company located in Fontana, California. West Coast Utility Equipment Company is the sole supplier of the Ili- Ranger model 511-55 bucket personnel piatfa-m in California and is willing to sell the bucket to the City. Since there is a demand for this type of bucket, and the normal lag time for recalpt of this bucket is six -to -nine months, stiff feels it is in the City's best interest to purchase the bucket directly from West Coast Utility Equipment Company without going through the normal time consuming request for proposal (RFP) process. If the normal RFP process was followed and the available bucket was sold to someone else, the tree maintenance prog•am could not begin until late in Fiscal Year 1988/89, due to the lag time in receiving the bucket. Based on the six -to -nine month lag time for normal delivery of a bucket, the current availability of a bucket and the need to start the tree maintenance program as soon as possible. staff is requesting City Council support of purchasing the Iii - Ranger model CH -55 personnel platform from West Coast Utility Equipment Company as a sole source supplier, and waiving the RFP process for the bucket purchase only. The chassis required for the aerial lift is readily available fro* several sources and an RFP will be developed and advertised for competitive bids. Respegtfully su,Vtted, Services 3S I CITY OF RANCHO C!JCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer .�QQ BY: Paul Rougem, Senior Civil Engieaerog SUBJECT: Concept approval to modify the conditions of approval of Tract 12671 to include the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, direction to the Planning Caaission to hold a public hearing for the ppu ose of considering such modification at their January 27, 1988, meeting and approval to allow the rediting of the costs of the traffic signal incurred by the developer against System Development Fees RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the. the City Council approve the attached resolution Qroviding for the inclusion of construction of a traffic signal at Base ine Road and Milliken Avenue in the conditions of approval of Tract 12671 and directing the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing for that purpose. It is also recommended that the cost of the signal be offset by credits against tt developers System Development Fees. Background/Analysis of Road and Milliken Avenue, which not be prudent to open the four is installed. A signal projecl in the budget pro osed for 198 the Engineering 8ivlsion to i closed until that signal was in in the final stage of e Road and Terra vista :ersection of Base Line no south leg. It would section unless a signal 6ion was to be included id it was the intent of g of the intersection 1. is now the desire of the developer to open the intersection prior to the earliest date that the city project could be completed in March, 1989. In order to obtain the signal earlier than that, it must be built as a part of the completion of the intersection, thus must be a part of the requirements set forth in the conditions• of approval of the Tract 12671 which is to complete Milliken Avenue at Base Line Road. A copy of the present conditions of approval affecting Milliken Avenue are atte.hed for your information.. 36 r a Even though this - signal would become a requti Tract 12611; the,sfgnal,,ls, included- in the, improvements and ws to be_proposed_,'"the °1S a Pro�lect budgeted- from'the System Or_.,lops& staff s recommendation that• the,'developer,be Avenue at an early date-, by congtructing the Signal in conjunction rlth the'street'i rev the signal be offset by credits against Mr d Fees. Respectfoly, submitted, r2 P Attachments: Resolution Letters map x a? of the deveiopment.of ar prrogram of capital. year', budget as I:' It 1s, therefore, Cted to open Milliken Line- Milliken _Traffic and that the cost of s r. I 1 n CCSR n Janwry 6, 1988 ' Page 2 Even though this - signal would become a requti Tract 12611; the,sfgnal,,ls, included- in the, improvements and ws to be_proposed_,'"the °1S a Pro�lect budgeted- from'the System Or_.,lops& staff s recommendation that• the,'developer,be Avenue at an early date-, by congtructing the Signal in conjunction rlth the'street'i rev the signal be offset by credits against Mr d Fees. Respectfoly, submitted, r2 P Attachments: Resolution Letters map x a? of the deveiopment.of ar prrogram of capital. year', budget as I:' It 1s, therefore, Cted to open Milliken Line- Milliken _Traffic and that the cost of s r. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA l o n O r V pp��qjjr 1 AN a r r r; c �s • PLANNING COMMISSION Ri4,:dTI0N N0. - - - ..�.r�.: > >• --- ;fin ='y TENTATIVE TRACT 12671 LEWIS HOMES t August 13, 1986 Page 4 13. The interface between single family lots and the interim school site, specifically Lots A. B, and C, shalt be provided with a temporary landscape and irrigation system. The selected design treatment shall be detailed 1n the landscape /irrigation plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. ative Trar.t: 1. Milliken Avenue shall be constructed from Mountain View Drive to Base Line Road as follows with thr first phase of development. A. Full improvements for the west roadbed, B. Full median with landscaping, C. A minimum IS -foot wide pavement for the east roadbed, and 0. Sidewalk, street lights, and landscape not required 2. Terra Vista Parkway shall be constructed from Tract 12365 to Milliken as follows with the first phase of development (except for portions alraady constructed): A. Full improvements for the south roadbed, B. Full median with landscape, ".. A miniaw 18 -foot wide pavement for the north roadbed, and D. Sidwalk, street lights, and landscape not required beyond tract boundary. 3. Mountain View Drive shalt be constructed from Tract 12365 to Milliken Avenue as follows with the first phase of development: A. Full improvements for the north side of the street, and B. A minimum 26 feet of pavement for the roadbed. i 4. Drainage control devices such as paved ditches, A.C. berms, or curves along the streets shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer. *(�� CrI T OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 16, 1987 Mr. John Helcher C.P. Project Director Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 UPlnd. CA 91765 '"Oman W W7./ Q[ CaWW4n/q nl/14/4�11/I Subject: Traffic Signal - Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road Dear John: Per our , subject traffic discussion pGivent normal installation the subject signal would he operational around March of 1989. I understand that this does not meet with your needs nd we would not want that intersection ope:•atillg as a four way until that signal was operational. As an alternate, we would be willing to go to City Council in January for a mid -year budget amendment which would add the subject signal to this year's budge:. However, it would still not be operational until around August of 1988. Again, I understand that this presents scheduling problems for you. would wo ld agreritherefore to the iresp nsibility to designit ndaconstruct theisubJject signal based on all direct costs being credited against systems fees from Your projects, we would go to the City Council in January for their approval. This would allow you to have the signal operaticnal within five months of that approval and would appear to best fit your schedule, Please let me know your position as soon as possible so that we can prepare the necessary doments and reports. very truly yours, CO"'XITY DEVE PMEMT DEPARTMENT ENGIMEE V SI r Rus agui City Engin R14i:sd CC: Paul Raugeau V.w. CwwY-n1w. DebaaA N. ln.e Ynrq Klry 41. v..y.. Drnnn LSmro cWt,L owpa II lrprle/la! Wn/w IawroM Wulm o S; s i 75PRA *'IM Docomber 18, 1987 .0 •.�a "y'r pT •T Li Eoglnabring Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 3ase Llue Road Rancho Cucamonga, Cq 91730 .attention, Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer t SubJecto Traffic 91gna1 -- Milliken Avenue and Bose Line Road Dea, Russo Lewis Homes agree% to bay for the design and construction of thw subJect signal, with the understandinq that all direct costs err credited against our sy%tims fees obligations. Please lwt ne anpw what steps we need to take oe.t to keep this p-•n1e,.t muvlrq. ilncei el,. t_ewfg N7ME5 CF CALIFfIRNIA /on• a. 'V elcner •1Ce °."Ider.tip ;a.ect De.eloomoit lwM 1. 1c • i 1 -3,... 1156N labunlan Ave RD So, 870 UPQrld. CA 91 i68 IIN1965-0971 I// .ad +.f. v l�cr. � 1 19A7 C11'1 � 71µ;,1W CUGYU:r:� (NWMit4lriG OlV.it4µ aw_a RESOLUTION NO. V-002✓ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLA:GiING COMMISSION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARINB AT'ITS JANUARY +27,4988, METING, fOR THE PURPOSE OF WDIFYINC THE CONDITIONS OF D APPROVAL OF TRACT-12671 TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION -OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL-AT T'.IE INTERSECTION OF BAST LINE ROAD AND MILLiKEN AVENUE ' WHEREAS, the developer of Tract 12671 desires to complete the intersection of Killiken Avenue and Base Line Road and open It to traffic as early as possible; and WMEAS, a traffic signal must be operating at tA, intersection before the additional leg can be opened to traffic. NON, THEREFORE,the City Council of the Ci1;Y of Rancho Cucamonga_, California, does resolve as follows: - SECTION 1 The Planning C0me13si0n shall hold a public hearing at its January 27, 1988 meeting for the purpose of modify;ng the Conditions of Approval of Tract 12671 to include construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and Millikcn Avenue. SECTION 2 That, subject to Planning Commission approval of She modification to the Conditirns of Approval of Tract 12671, all costs for design and construction and other expenses as approved by the City Engineer, shall be credited against the developers System Jevelo;ment Fees. yz I DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 6, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steven Allen, Junior Civil Engineer Authorize the appropriation of $20,732.84 from the Federal Aid Urban funds, (FAU) account number 24- 4637 -8068, for the final payment for the Archibald Avenue Trunk Sewer and Street Construction project to T.A. Rivard, Inc. RECOMPODATIOM: It is recommended that City Council approve the aFpropriation of $20,732.84 from the FAU Fund, account number 24-4637-8068, for the final payment for the Archibald Avenue Trunk Sewer and Street Construction reject to the project's contractor, T.A. Rivard. Background /Analysis The Archibald Avenue Trunk Sever and Street Co Federal Aid Urban (FAU) program and is subject Highway Administration (FW%) and Caltrans. `a to the local govrrmeents. A joint Caltrc r audit has determined that an additional contractor. The contract provides that up 1 acceptance of the project, adjustments to the fl if necessary due to clerical errors. The proje through the FAU Fund; therefore, this aiditfona be made from that same Fund. Rasp f submitted, J4 S13 project was a by the Federal City Staff review and ),732.84 1s due the one year after final 1 payment will be made was originally funded appropriation needs to y :ru RECOMY.L M&T 0 That the city Council allthariza the expenditure 0' additional funds in the amount cf $10,675.00, from the Park Development Fund for the increased scope of services to bo accomplished at Beryl and Lions Parks. A&QnMQ=: On November 5, 1986, City Council authorized the award of the contract to Recreation Systems, Incorporated, for the design of tennis courts and related improvements at Beryl and Liono Parks. Since that time, the Se:upe of Services to be provided et those two facilities has been increased to includes 1) a Mardcourt Facility at Lions Park, 2) Subs 'jriace Araa Drainage at both facilities and, 3) a Master planned Storm Drain System at Beryl Park as wail as co ,)rdination of the storm drain system with Nnst Beryl Park (also currently under design). The additional cost for these services would be $18,679 00, increasing the original contract amount to $36,579.00. This increased cost is still in keeping with the 6% of construction cost estimated for design services and is below the other competitive design bids originally raceived. IT.e Park Development fund will be reimbursed by the Engineering Division in Fiscal Year 1988 -89, for those costs incurred relating to the design and construction of the Master Plan Storm Drain System for Beryl Park. RMcE -bs yY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S` "F REPORT c c � , � z Date: January 6, 1988 s •� 1477 To: City Council and City Manager I From: Karen Mc0uira- Emery, Associate Park Planner-,j�.�' �. Subject: Approval of Additional Funding for the 1 Improvement of Beryl and Lions Parks , RECOMY.L M&T 0 That the city Council allthariza the expenditure 0' additional funds in the amount cf $10,675.00, from the Park Development Fund for the increased scope of services to bo accomplished at Beryl and Lions Parks. A&QnMQ=: On November 5, 1986, City Council authorized the award of the contract to Recreation Systems, Incorporated, for the design of tennis courts and related improvements at Beryl and Liono Parks. Since that time, the Se:upe of Services to be provided et those two facilities has been increased to includes 1) a Mardcourt Facility at Lions Park, 2) Subs 'jriace Araa Drainage at both facilities and, 3) a Master planned Storm Drain System at Beryl Park as wail as co ,)rdination of the storm drain system with Nnst Beryl Park (also currently under design). The additional cost for these services would be $18,679 00, increasing the original contract amount to $36,579.00. This increased cost is still in keeping with the 6% of construction cost estimated for design services and is below the other competitive design bids originally raceived. IT.e Park Development fund will be reimbursed by the Engineering Division in Fiscal Year 1988 -89, for those costs incurred relating to the design and construction of the Master Plan Storm Drain System for Beryl Park. RMcE -bs yY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA + 5 STAFF REPORT BATE: .;anuary 6, 1988 ,Js TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City - Engineer BY: Duane Baker, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Reimbursement of- Base Line Road Costs Adjacent to the ' Future Rancho Cucamonga Central Park Site - RECOWINDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the expenditure of $38,884.64 plus $12.65 per day frog November 30, 1987, to the 6WW reimbursement from the Systems Development Fund, account 22- 4637 -8124. This reimbursement will be for street improvements Installed by Lewis Homes adjacent to the future park site in accordance with the agreement signed by the City and Lewis Homes. Background /Analysis When the City negotiated the purchase of the Central Park site with Lewis Hocv:s, one of the provisions cove -ea the improvement of Base Line Road. The provision states that if Lewis Homes develops Base Line Road at its e:,vnse before tie park site is developed, then the City will reimburse Lewis Home: for their share of the expense as parcels of the park site are released to the City. ResD submitted, RHM:OB:sd r Yr i f c i Sys y i CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAbiONGA ii ti STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Mott -e Inviting Bids' for the Arrow Route Street Improvement Project, Phase I located between Archibald and Turner Avenues RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Arrow Route Street Improvw -nt Project, Phase I, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the •Notice inviting Bids." Bacsground /Analysis The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by Don Greek and Associates, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer The Engineer's estimate for construction is ;317,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for January 11th and 18th, 1988, with the bid opening at 2:00 P.M. on Friday, January 22, 1988. Respectf submitted, C RHM:SA:sd y� RESOLUTION NO. $$ -003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLAAS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE 1", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLEPX TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Ranchn Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. by the WCityofFRRannchoECucamonga Vbe andtareehereby approved fasathenplanssandd specifications for "Arrow Route Street Improvements, Phase 10. BF IT er directac to advertise OasEr h equiredbyClaw for rthe srece pt oftssealed bids or proposals for doing the wcrk specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS- Pursuant to a San Bernardino CountyolCalifornia,1edirecting thisenotice, NOTICE oISuHEREBYa� GIVEN :hat the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 22nd day of January, 1988, sealed bids or Proposals for the "Arrow Route street Improvements, Phase I" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. City BofsRancho Cucamonga, aCal ifornia ,dmarked,thBiduforsConstruction of Arrow Route Street Improvements, Phase I". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing per a wages for Director of theDepartment oflIndustrialv Relations rof the Stater of a California t/7 a� '' RESOLUTION PAGE 2 Is repaired to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per dies wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per them rages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at this ,lob site. The Contractor shalt forfeit as penalty to the City of Randno Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars (55.00) for each laborer, workman, -or mechanic eaployad for each caiendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hdreinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor undo him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regilations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1/77.6 of the Labor Code concerning the emoloyment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under hiu. Section 1777.5, as mended, rewires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to fivs except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an averagd of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or D. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can shoo that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or Ya J RESDLVIa PAGE 3 D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his cunt acts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen In any apprentiaable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. ' The Contractor and subcontractor under him shad comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work far all workmen Mloyed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2. Part 7 Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code Of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed In the execution of the contract, 'ay him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work rewired by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal ash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (109) of the amount of <_aid bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said ash cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Y9 RESOLUTION PAGE 4 If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The mount of the bond to be given to sense a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract pprice thereof, and an additional bond in an amount evual to fifty percent (50Y) of the contract price for said work shall be given'to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work ,ir labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between his and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will b3 considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class 'A• License (General Enginee^ing X Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law a (California %siness and Professions Code, Section 7000 et, seq.) and rules �^ and reggulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is dwarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucax,.,s on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to t;he City cf Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00, said f35.00 is nonrefundable. r Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. t� The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Station 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). SO a; RESOLUTION G; PAGE S the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. y order of tira Cotncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 19 r, PASSED ktl) ADOPTED by the Council tof the California, this day of City of Rancho Cucamonga, I9 Mayor ATTEST: City W �1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VN STAFF REPORT ARRt - - DATE: January 6, 1988 adt TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Junior Civil Engineer-q SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting9 Bids' for the Baseline Road Widening Improvement Project, free Archibald to Hellman. WCONOWTION: It is recommended that Ci;Y Council approve plans and specifications for the Baseline Road Widening Improvennt ")roiect, free Archibald to Hellman and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids.' Background /Analytls The subject project plans and sp.xlfications have been completed by Linville Civil -igineers, Inc., reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $247,000.00. Legal advertis ng is scheduled for January 11 and Janua y 18, 1988, with the bid opening at 10:00 am, Friday, January 22, 1988. Rasp aLbmitted, I cc: Purchasing JZ RESOLUTION NO. $8'064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUQ;MXGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BASELINE ROAD WIDENING", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, It Is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. HOV., T=HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and speifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for •Baseline Road Widenin0". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise at required by lair for the receipt of sealed-bids cr proposals for doing M work specified in the aforesaid plans and spsehfieations, which said advertisement shall be substantially it; the followinp words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS* Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GI YEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of10:00 o'clock a.m. on the 22nd day of January 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Baseline Road Widening" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read imsedfately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "Baseline Road Widening ". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice Is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less then the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per them wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are an file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any Interested party on request. The Contractong Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be pos.ed at the ,lob site. S3 The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollare ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herainbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Cade. In accordance ulth tlxr provisions of Section 1711.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be erployed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeshl program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The eertllcate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journxymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 esys prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 5y Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the a execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall Comply with and be governed b 2 artP7. Chapter Is having cle do witheworkingChou hours as set forth in Division Y the laws of the as mended. Late of California The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, t" ^b_five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic he e!oyuponia execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under which said la the work hereinbefore mentioned, for -each calendar day during mars than eight (b)'h°Urs in violattionaofcs id required or Permitted to labor to execute Contract r agrees � usay travel and subsistence pay to each workman Payments are defined in the ep licableceolUctive bargaininglagre sistercE in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. agreements filed checkheobib bidder's must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check equal to at least tendpercentl(lo; of Me of Rancho Cucamon a for anramount that the bidder will enter into the propoeed oontractstf ;bin as a guarantee to him. and k. event of failure to enter into such contract said wctesha Cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the Property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City a? Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest lowOf bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the est Ran ho Cucamonga to ifea ifference between the low bid and the second The any, shall ba returned to the lowest bidder. contractaffornsaidwork shallbbegonenhundreduper faithful of �ece of the price thereof, and an additional bond to an amount equal to •tf (5c) of the contract price for said work 'n be given to secure the of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the pertormw�epofcthe work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or u payment done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be 'required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance coverin his employees u on ,q kind Rancho nCucamongaafor hohC�tructionrOf sad wrrk.An him nd the said City to be of not beenrIssued bylthe be City of Rancho considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has ty of Rancho Cucamonga, Contractor) in accordance alth the provisions afithesCont Generals Engineering (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract 1s awarded, et. seq.) and rules The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and sPecnfications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the office of the SS' r, City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of-" the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City.of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of S35.00, said $3S.00 1s nonrefundabia, Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonrelmbursable payment of $15.00 to cover the r}1 cost of mailing charges and overhead. i The successful bidder will be required to enter Into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, - upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and aapense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Reecho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. _ By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of , 19 ✓- PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of 19 ATTEST: L City e 6( VVYor a. 4ZS t vf; l ,J IN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1963 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec� SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12316 -1 RECOM RATION: It is recamaended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /P.nclysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Lewis Heroes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $95,830 Respectf^ submitted, :sd 69 - - — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1968 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: eve N. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect a SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The required street improvements for OR 86 -07 have been completed in an acceptable canner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Band in the amount of $10,600.00. BACKGROUND /AMAUSIS OR 86 -07 - located at the North East Corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street Release: DEVELOPER: Arical Properties 2900 Bristol St. -Blvd. D- Suite 104 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $10,600.00 58 r v.l Win' V, • uW '4: t :W RESOLUTION N0. Sg- O05. C RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF RANCHO )RJR DRN86' CALIFORNIA C0M'LETION FORRTTHE WO�RIZIMg THE FILIN6W AID OTICE w been completed �' constructfen of public fop the satisfaction of the City Enyjneeeer;�andr DR NHEREA$ 86 -07 have the work coeplete.a No -lee of Completion is required to be f11ed,• certifying NDN- the Ci 9i THEREFORE du- be it resolved, that the work is the County Engineer is authorized Lo sign and file a Motive of C Recorder of San It olno County, hereby accepted and opl etlon• w(th- It I 1( CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -' STAFF REPORT t*4 04TE: January 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Rus3e11 N. Maguire, CitY Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Ir:spacto SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion. RECp6E OTION: The required street iaptovecents for OR 86 -17 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council Accept- said . andraut�horze the CitY Clerk to release the Faithful NPerfarsan a BaMf1D the amount of $14,000.00. BACKGROUND /ANALYSTS 86 -11 located at the Kl usawn Avenue North Mist Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Kl DEVELOPER: Vineyard National Bank 9590 Footh411 Boulevard Rancho Cuc Tonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $14,000.00 Respectful ubmitted, mrWS :sm 60 i �to�i m �t NESOLOTION N0. F8•00(a A RESOLUf70M OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF' FOR pg�5: �IFORNIA. ACCEpT7N6 THE PUELIC IM y 17 AND E W0F IIING THE FILING OF NOTICE W, COMPLETION FOR OA NOAK A M07iCE OF' been eoapjek�• the construction of Fuhllc f royeaents W1E satisfaction of the C1ty ¢ny /near; and DR 86_17 have the cHEWAS a Notfce of Completion 1s requfred to be filed, certifyin the City NON' THEREFORE,' Da it 9 the Cob' Fnyfneer is authorized Laosig xa end Yrk Is pted and County Recoroer of•San Bernardino County, Lice ofrCom letf 0°Pletfon with 5 C, ,x x rA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12952, located east of Haven Avenue, wrest of Deer Creek Channel and south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Glenfed Development RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agr.ment extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Ioprovecant Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tract 12952 were approved by the City Council on December 18, 1986, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: 5950,000 Labor and Material Bond: $475,000 The developer, Glenfed Development, is requesting approval' of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe tied, R Attachments 6.2, _j _ i'•i t A dCSOLUTI NO. SS >007 r EXTdA ANNO <t� ygENENT PR MG 1NP �E CITY OF ION CaliPor NNIREAS, t SELy1RlTy FORYTiiRAEii gr'NF57 executedfq� has forhit4ity Councf I29S2 dopro vm*nt Of 4rY 6r 19ons1deratfo, the City of Creek ct., thareinubllc ri9tt_af. Gienfed Inprovement A 0 Cucoya Channei, sou:,of lit gene rally ocatacedt to>�ent as9devejot Extnnslon real Taprry WHEREAS lit rally gvenue. t of Nawrn Avenuerty, Spec -for th con;un Ilan with�ntandtutWon of suc . oast of Deer Y the develo Jett to the h faCrov In S.Ianfed by - said aVrOve a Of said Trarms thereof andsatoribe One 1 Id o said laCrov flood and sufflearent 2• be Rancho Cuc�on a EREFOREeemenYEntanslloono ement Securon i secured and said Imp'Ov ent' Califor BE- IT RESO , hieh fs ldent the Cf authorrizetdSecurl;Y b3' that said 6Y ggthe city Identified w of Rancho Cucy nga iQ �thee� le �nt Et greement i do nxd t e for est theretobehatf of 1s 1 f $' Ir I -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAa. STAFF REPORT DATE; January 6, 1968 TO: City Council and City manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect !: SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12952 Channel, located east of Highland Haven Avenue, submitted dofbyeeGlenfed Development RECD MBATION It is accepting ctthe subject aagreeme titextensionl andosecurit aandcauthorizing ithe Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACr.GROUND of the publi Agreement - ovemen s for Tract 12952 (Storm Crain) weretapprovedrbytthe City Council on Jecenber 18, 1985, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $209,000 Labor and Material Bond: $104,500 requesting approval of a 12 -month Copies of the Improvement Agreement s Office. The developer, Glenfed Development, is extension on said Extension are available t e agreement. aClerk, Respe u mltted, RHM:SM :s Attachments ,: .3 F RESOLUTION NO. TV -00$ r ; A RESOLUTION OF TNt CITY COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO , CUCAMMGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT N . EXTENSION, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TPACT 12952-(5'fORM DRAIN) V WHEREAS, the Citiy Council -of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on January 5, 1988, by Glenfed Development as developer, for the i Improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally,located east of Maven Avenue, west of Deer c, Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terns thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12952 (Storm Drain); and_ _ -• , WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ra 1T�.� 7 : STAFF REPORT r Date: January 6, 1988 �) To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvements and Dedication between Mayne and Erma Dennis. and the City 09 Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontag,r side of Base Line RoadRbeetween Archibald a ddAmithyst north RECD NE1DATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Wayne and Erma Dennis and the City of Rarcho Cucamorgd. BW,KGROUND /ANALYSIS• The attached subject Agreement between the City 'r: Wayne ad Errm Otnnis provides for street lmprovernts which incluA, c r, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and street pC k nU along the Bennis Base Line Road Frontage. Wayne am Erin Bel , sve agreed to grunt to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of Base Line Road in return for the construction of said improvements. Of Special Note: The Improvements to be constructed are minimal in natu,e and are to be considered temporary. They will have be be removed and rebuilt to full Boulevard Standards including meandering Kilks and street landscaping. Such wort: will remain the owners responsibility and are conditioned to occur upon development of the property. The dedication being made by the Dennis' is only partial, leaving an additiorAl piece to be dedicated at the time of develop =nt. T -fe agreement is sufficient fcr this project. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjuction with the City's Base Line Road Widening frw Archibald Avenue to Turner Avenue. 4:pRes 1 mi tted, a Attachment 10� :QL` ± • •:F��ib:i: Fr'l�'�°2�:.ri�:.' -arc it;;;,Y ,rr v _.. vru; ^ >:'.�::Ys :•c!.:.�s- 1e 4'A+dl . n,n •'�i- •if•', i yin +,. j:;��- RESOLUTION NO. 88 -009 ` A RESOLUTION OF THE -:ITY COUNCIL OF THE .CITY OF RANCP4.CUCANDMI1t CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIi% AN AGREEMENT FOR :.INSTALLATION'. OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT' AND DEDICATION FROM WAYNE AND RMA DENNIS, AND AU'rHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, the City Cleric of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirecents for construction of frontage imrovements in conjunction with the Base Line Road Widening; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, dr .e approach, sidewalk, c� street lights and street,povements located at 9540 Hot -ds Court, to be made part of the Base line Road Widening; and WHEREAS. Wayne and Erma Dennis have agree {, U daticata Right -of Way as reimbursement to the,City far said improveaene• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that tR xil:of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept. sale , Qat Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to'sign same, and w,acts the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. i„ 'i'•CC� 679 xk` — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 6, 1g88 To: City Council and C1ty Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John !. Baron, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of Agreement for Installation Improvement and Dedication between James of Public Stella Harrell and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ani for Street Frontage oImprovements rrooww Route between Arrow h bala'ana Turneon th% north side REC —DM: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution Dedication between James and Stella He Public Improvement and Cucamonga, and the Imp Y of Rancho 8At7(C —IS' The attached subject Agreement between the City and James Harrell provides for street improvements which include curbs sidewalks, dlrwe approaches, street lights and street av and Stella Harrell Arrow Routs Fronts gutters, grant to the City a Road►gge. Ease�mesntand Stella Harrell hass agreed too lmproveaeat of Arrow Rou to allow for Improvements. to 1n return for the constructiono of9 and said Said street improvements will be constructed in conduction with the City's Arrow Route Phase I Street Improvement Project Avenue to Turner Avenue. from Res f Archibald submitted, RHM:JLM:paai Attachment W O Y� E WIW NUITE - DWE I CL7 Cl Aaatls LAN+ sort MOD"m+u&to aV of Aaorho am oea ro. Bo: tnT A°tno0. G WINO etAte Uael TNr taMNfa elapaeRyy� —� FASEW' PoA A VALUAC p0 SmaATION. m .W of ohkh k newt kni{iywd. and STELLA NApMtr � OAAMITS) to LAS Coy of RM'M CLmeonle. • MookW Co potaWoa, r PASEMMU for fo. oavapl tfpoo OUt taealo AO WAY Pt'APOSES 48forals. Duelead a ftawrd tao Plop" Is tnoCNp of1Aetho C..Ap Convey O "MtoafNao. Sivsof TM South 10 feet of that ppoortion of the Southeast puarpr of the Sa.Lapft quarter o/ Ou Warfel WQuarter of Secti0 It. Twmshfo 1 South, Aanye 7 West, San mss q ar Base and Nerldlan, 1n the Eaupe„ of San Bernard m, State of C41 San etcord)ny to 6oremaand Survey, described as fa lore: Beyfnnfny 40 fast North, 770 feet West ofQUthe Southeast confer of the Southeast Quarter o/ the Southreet Quarter of the Norprt�uG Nf hvr; of said sectfom, said point of oeytnnfny feet thmm' South 115 feet f to 1 l • thence North IaS /cat tMrce, West 60 cote, East 60 /eat to the point of Myfnnlny, yy, 'bv a p;ly yy ',a w•HNa•W CayM11 1 r- ... w. ,fatt`!a A CtitpW!t, qt•! - NcQOruocmfelf, �ttiAla _Nd04rLa90eMaR.� T e �= tuiS - DWZMAL AicXHGWLADDYpat f /'//rt. L . f Button h k Dn uu 1 uu! dot of County of M uodaNpnod Nottrf tiak. a «w.wty oppaA,ap 1Z 93 p�1yn~10M laapmma tF' `,teM Mao ofwwfwm Manta ' ppoew•Yal anew •jf' f •- a AoMINi,+COSTA S'�' i N,w,ra•cG M•buTreLMSacI!p dypMVU1 ` 1 tuOanaM tolM N a+ed and ff 'KU:al t—. yy, 'bv a p;ly yy ',a w•HNa•W CayM11 1 r- ... w. ,fatt`!a A CtitpW!t, qt•! - NcQOruocmfelf, �ttiAla _Nd04rLa90eMaR.� T e �= tuiS g�.uas 1'rGG I r I st �2 S oa fx 3 0 a Post. I19F 4 GI SW j4 M Nwi i T.19a R.7Wi .6.6.1" `x EXH181T 8 U X . -� a °r swx ar Nwy+ I g�.uas 1'rGG I r I st �2 S oa fx 3 0 a Post. I19F 4 GI SW j4 M Nwi i T.19a R.7Wi .6.6.1" `x EXH181T 8 U X . -� a °r swx ar Nwy+ RESOLUTION N0. a8 -010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COI'kU OF THE CITY OF FOR �NS7 pNCAL ORNIA, •+ Er'IMG AN ASREEMENT DEDICATION FROM JAMES AND MPROYEMENT µO AUTHMIZING THE HAYGJ AND QUA TO IS�t,!f¢Lik AND establish requirement or construction Of of Pront�age improvaeentsmfnga o Conjunction with the Arrow Route phase I Street age I prove ent$ in and street lights and � street pavements of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, Part of the Arrow Route pha binSt loc Improvement edat ProowRoute, . to be Bade of -My as refatu"ursEAS, James and Stella Harrell have agreed to d • YY A` the City for said inprovewnts, ed•cate Right - to of Rancho�Cuca THEREFORE. BE I7 RESOLVED, that the Ctty Council of the Clerk toer record alr in thee'City Clerk does sme, and directs the , the Office of the C the Bernardino County, California. County Recorder of San Bernardino 'a t• ON — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t STAFF REPORT ' Data: January 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager AN Frou: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer By John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineered Subject: Approval of Agreement for Installation of public Niguel �Ruiz and Rose Martob8rtlsenoMardlthe City Of Ranch Cucamonga for Street Frontage Ieprovements at 9850 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner mc�OMlE) Wlol . It is recommended that city Council adopt the attached Resolution Depraving the Agreement for Installation of public Improvexnt and Dedication between Martin and Marie Lozano, Briseno and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Miguel Ruiz and Rose Marie 6Afd( YSIS- The attached subject Agreement between the City and Martin and Mane Lozano, Miguel Rutz and Rose Marie Driseno provides for street Improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, dirve approaches, street lights and Mari pavements along the Lozano Arrow Route Frontage. Martin and Marie Lozano, Niguel Rutz and Rose Marie Briseno have agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widenfng and improvement of Arrow Route in said improvements. return for the construction of Said street loute Phase me se will be constructed in ronjuction with the Avenue to Turner Avenue. City s Arrow Route I Street Improvement Pro, xt from Archibald Respec f submitted, R .pam Attactm*nt 7a- RESOLUTION N0. SS-011 FANCA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HO INSTALLATION CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT DEDICATION FROM MARTIN AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND AND ROSE MARIE BRISENO, AND IE LOZANO, MIGUEL RUIZ AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR establish requirements' or construction othe CitagefRancho Cucamonga to conjunction with the Arrow Route phase I Street Improvement Project; and street lights and stre'ee Pavements entsnlocatcurb. tgutte .drive approach, sidewalk, 9850 part of the Arrow Route phase I Street Improvement project; and to be made - Brlseno have agreeed to' dedicateaRigghht�ofLYZano' Miguel Rutz and Rosa Marie said improvements. W as reimbursement to the C1 b for City of Rancho Cucamonga, CaliforniaREd�oes accept said ImprovecentlAgre meant, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the Agreement Clerk to record sane in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino City County, California. 6 I: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r001hr-. January 6, 1988 ` TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for MDR 86 -24 located on the east side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Russell Stanley'West Incorporated RECONEgDATION It is receenended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND MDR 86 -24 located on the east side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of Fourth Street, in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District, was approved by the Planning Department on November 29, 1986. The Developer, Russell Stanley West Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the followirg amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $6,000 Labor and Material Bond: $3,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. Respect$ ly submitted, R . Attachments 7y JYy3 ��rL?g .t�1IfN�_�; , -•�� _- _, 'ti d,`�- t1�ty- ��Y��1it�)`. e � s RESOLUTION N0: SS-0 %;L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMaT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -24 California ,{Ehassforhits icy nsideration anaImprroovement Agreement executed on December 7, 1587, by Russell Stanley West Incorporated as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of Fourth Street; and tgree t f such ir described said ImprovemenAemnt andsubject to the terath thereof, istobedone in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Department, Minor Development Review No, 86 -24; and' WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. Rancho Cucamonga, Califernia,TthatOsad Improvement Agreementfandesaidy of Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement an behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. f + Y i x �1 ! CITY OF RANC"O CUCAMONGA SNoaera rmwom roo ROOF rnx MDR B6 -24 777 ZZBUR,k 1 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA It STAFF REPORT, DATE: January 6, 1988 wuc�y TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Enginec-ing Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 87 -21 located on the south side of Sixth Street, between Archibald Avenue and Lucas Ranch Road, submitted by The Ba - nakian Group RECGMEIIDATIOR It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND DR 87 -21 located on the south side of Sixth Street, between Archibald Avenue and Lucas Ranch Road, in the General Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 24, 1987. The Developer, The Barmakian Group, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $100,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 50,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. Respe Zsubmitted, R . Attachments 't. 77 RESOLUTION N0. 58-OIZ A RESOLUTION OF,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORRIA,•APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 4ND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. D7 -21 WHEREAS, roeutngnexeCal iforna afftscnsideration an ImpvmeAre�euted on December 3, 1987, by The Barmaktan Group as developer, for the toprovement of public right- of -MAy adjacent to the real property specifically described_ therein, and generally locatod on the south side of Sixth Street, between Archibald Avonue and Lucas Ranch Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements , described 1n said Improvement Areement and subject to the terms thereof, is to described done in Commission, De gyvelopmcentvRevieewno. 87-21, rand Property as referred to planning•_ good and sufficient ImprImprovement nt Security. r.ecurpq and by Improvement Agreement. ROW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of tlo City of Rancho Cu Improvement c monga, California, that said Improvement r Agreement and said hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement ondb halfhcfMtlerCity of is Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 1 l5 ct-I S141" STREEr cr= _ �R B7 -21 CITY OF ""C$0 CUCAMOlV(;A E[1aII,r.a NZVW6N LV � d-4. n W Tnts R87 - -21 ' •! 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM'ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 13440 13441, 13442, 13445, Parce' Map 10„17, DR 87 -21, DR 87 -13 and OR 87 -09 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 35 and setting the date of public hearing for February 3, 1988 RECOINEIIDATION It is recomrended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Cie Engineer's R.00rt for Annexation No. 35 and setting the dxte of p'•olic hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the (hove descriLed tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's Intent to annex Tract Nos. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13445, Parcel Map 10617 DR 87 -21, DR 87 -15 and OR 87 -09 (various locations throughout the Cityl to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation 35 and setting the public hearing date for February 3. 1988. Also attached for Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the subject annexation. Respect f s 6 itted, V RMM:JI Attachments V! p, I RESOLUTION NO. TT-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAI CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 35 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on January 6, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dlrectnd tire City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of salt City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has barn presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report -is sufficient, and that said report, nor arpr part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, 1NEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the Itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses 1, connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc— rimed -in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land ,ithin said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said- sJ�sment District to proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for�rposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance Dist -ict No. 1 Annexation No. 35 for Tract Nos. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13445, Parcel Map 10617, OR 87 -21, OR 87 -15 and P�R 87 -09 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abuttinp the street lights. :fork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on ma?or stree.s (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by Che City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact 1-3cation of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for .treet lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a Part or this report to the some extent as if said plans and specifics sere attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illuminati -)n of the subject area. ' 4 Y SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No, of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamm Size* YTD No. 35 Total 5800L 444 0 444 9500L 477 8 485 16,DDOL 16 0 16 22,000L 3 1 4 27.500L 6 0 6 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Lamp Size Lamps Rate No's 5800L 444 X S 8.93 X 12 9500L 485 X 210.16 X 12 16,000L 16 X 212.08 X 12 22,000L 4 X 213.84 X 12 27,500 6 X 215.31 X 12 Total Annual Maint. Cost 2. Total Assessment Units: vTO Assess Units before this annexation - Assessment Units this annex per page 4 - Total Assessment Units Total Annual Maint. Cost • 5 47,579.04 • 59,131.20 2,319.36 • 664.32 • 2.939.52 2112,633.44 15,190 677 15,867 �. s J 3. Cost per Assessment.:nit: Total Annual Maintenance Cart • $113 633.44 £7.10 /year /unit a. o n s, n sir'i —CT 43a7— ]"" Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. ' - SECTION S. Assessment Diagram !1 �) r Copies of the proposed A:sessiaent Diagrams are attached to :his {' report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance Disw in No. 10, Annexatiep 11o. 35.' These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6, Ascessment A Improvements for the District are found to be of general be,:aflt to ;� '• all units nithin the District and that assessment shall be equ:,l °or each +• unit. phew. uWts are based on acreage, assessment wilt be 2 units per-•_ ? net acre. y SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City ? Engineer's Peport. H 2. City Council adopts R -isolution of Irtention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3, city Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to fora a District or abardon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report wit's the City Council. 3. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public. hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r �Y. W . f Y - 11Yr r n.S�J EXHIBIT 'A' v c iqf Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. i ` 35 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1:! Assess. No. of Lamps to be Annexed Project Acreage 'iL— •56G0r"9OC t [one 1 TR 13440 - -- 111 - -- - -- --- --- - - TR 13441 - -- 115 - -- - -- -° --- --- TR 13442 --- 152 -- --- -° --- °- TR 13445 - -- 215 --- --- --- --- --- Lone 2 PM 10617 16.93 34 -•• --- °- --- °- OR 87 -21 6.25 12 - -• 2 - - - -- --- OR 87 -15 1.64 3 - --- -- °' OR 87 -D9 17.40 35 3 1 _- 677 . f Y - 11Yr r n.S�J I 4' U Y Y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 35' ,s. Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONOA 34-}0 „ COUNTY OF BAN BFRNARDINO 8: STATE OF CAWORMA T im 1� 9 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION H0.35 Crff OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COU'ffff OF SAN 13MWMWENO STATE OF CALIFORM t 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 35' sro; Y^ CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN P%aNARDIN0 ,3 A' STATE 01 CAWPORNIA A T X- S r r; �9 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 35' q lrt j , C SCHOOL too 4% ow PARK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAUONOA COUNTY OF SAN B MMMINO STATE OF CAL ORNIA - N C 't I I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 35' CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO `76 + STATE OF CALVIORNIA T l� i I -1; 0 7 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No.Z A101EUTION NO. 35' u u CPPY OF RANCHO CIlCA3toNGA coum of am nmmw No STATE OF cAWFORNIA - N n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.Z ANNEXATION NO. 35' i ,s�gl-'4wY I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN DSRNARDINO MAM OF CAlVOR11IA N nn �" I i •1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.Z ANNEXATION NO. 35' t Y 1 CIT° 08 RANCHO CUCAI[ONaA A .I COUNTY U$ eAri HERNARDIIiO E. r' C ` ii STATE OF CALIFOR IA T 6 I �1J — i'm RESOLUTION NO. HS -OAS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. AN ASSESSMENT UISTMICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION4 AS ANNE7(ATICN NO. 35 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION I. Descri flan of Work: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e n en ion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection wlth said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wTiffn roadway r g -o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 35 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the cantemplate3 worF, lnifo op n on o said y aunt , is o' more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is as,essed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is describea as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain *Map of Annexation No 35 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. IN maps is on file in the office of th_ City Clerk of said City. SECT1911 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution N�Fas approve a repeat of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ?Y ■� RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTIQV S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be rollect at a an same -Ei� d'fn -M same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Eneincer shall file a report annually with the City ' Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. any objections to the work or extent and show cause why said work should district should not be formed in acc Intention. Protests must be in,writ property in which each signer therae the same, and most be delivered to t time set for the hearing, and no oth considered. If the signer of any pr assessment roll of San Bernardino Co described in the protests, then such written evidence that such signer is herein prcpos sal a one an carried 3 the legislature of the State of Callfornl Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 o the State of California. Notice is hereby given that the City Council Chambers at any and all perscns having essment district, may appear or carried out or why said h this Resolution of " t contain a description of the ty Clerk of said City prior to the otests it objections will be 1s not shown upon the last equalized as the owner of the property est most contain or be accompanied by owner of the property so described. tin Act of 1972: All the work through in pursumKe of an act of a designated the Landscaping and f the Streets and Highways Code of SECTION S. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be madeursuan to section 61961 o-FTFe-Uo-v-e—r=-P—nE7bde. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the saw, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the dace set for the hearing, at least once in The Oa11 Re oEt, a newspaper of general circulation published to the City of On Tar o, a ornle, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. a is CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer { BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Enginsering Aide - = SUBJECT: 13445v (W.c orta) to Street Lighting Maintenance 13444 District No. 3 Annexation 30 1 .988 d setting the date of public hearing f February - RECOMELDATIOR epprovtng theme Engineer's Report for Annexation NO 7aandcsettingsthetdate of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. Ana Tysis/Backoround Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13444 and 13445 andcsettingt' het public thearingMdatee for cFebruary c3 �1988.asAlsoeattached fcr Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the subject annexatiog. Respectful submitted, RtW:J ' Attachments % .' .'4 RESOLUTION NO. TY-01Q, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUIICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOKGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR AK4EXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAInTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, on January 4, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file iith the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk -of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds Oat each and-every part of said report is sufficIen?, and that said report, ..or any part thereof, requires or should be mcdtfied in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses U-s—a d work and of the incidental expenses 4n connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram sho•'ng the Assessment District referred to and de_sc_rT6e_FTn said report, the bounaariei of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Oistrict are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sand Kssssment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTICR 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for —ilia purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the Proposed district. 77 CITY OF RANCHO CtIDOONGA Enginetr's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria) Annexation No. 7 for Tract Nos. 134x0, 13441, 13442, 13444 and 13445 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highw ys Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifi;ations The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. i sY e SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City: Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. _ Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units to Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 3-ii' shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and °.nerav Cost: *High bressure Sodium Vapor Total No. of 2,414 Assessment Units this annex Lamps Lamp Size Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 7 Total 5800L 870 188 1,058 9500L 82 - -. 82 16,0001. - -- -•' --. 22,000L - -- .•-- -.. 27.500L - -- -.- - -. *High bressure Sodium Vapor 2. Total Assessment units: YTD Assess Units Total annexation • 2,414 Assessment Units this annex Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Assessment pate 3,183 Ho's Maint. Cost 58DOL 1,058 X f 8.93 X 12 $113,375.28 95DOL e2 X $10.16 X 12 9,997.44 16,000L - -- X $12.08 X 12 0 22,0001. - -- X $13.84 X 12 • 0 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X 12 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost $123,372.72 2. Total Assessment units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 2,414 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 769 Total Assessment Units 3,183 3, Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 512372 538.75 /year /unit No. o Units n District , Assessment shall apply to each lat or parcel as explained in Section 6. a SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled °Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 30, Annexation No. 7. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per. net t' acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report, - 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all tastimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Erlineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Ca....I1 conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. I 0 v Zone 1 Zone 2 =,u YFF 0 ti r EXHIBIT "A" Pro erties and, improvements to be included within Annexation No. 7 to �treet Lighting Maintenance District 3: ,Assess. No. of L s to be Annexed IEW Project Acreage ' UnttL• TR 13440 .._ TR 13441 - -- 115 28 TR 13442 -__ 152 48 ___ _ -_ _._ TR 13444 - -_ 176 23 .» --- - -- TR 13445 -__ 215 58 TOTAL 769 168 1 7 w ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.9 ANNExATION NO. 7 CITY OF PANC$O CUCAMON}A t. _. • Cony OF BAN BMARDINO A STATE OF CALMRNIA im .F yt ��, 1G��' r I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. 7 � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e: , a COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A t, ±� S'T'ATE OF CALIFORNIA — T a. �� 1'� It" it i i E' RESOLUTION NO. '97 -017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAiD ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tton of Work: That the public interest and convenience req�e an t s e n ention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Mork: The foregoing described work is to be located wifFTn roadway r g -o -w;y enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 30. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment Distri,.. ,.iat the contempla%o wort, to rne opinion of said ty ouncTT; is of mrre than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby mares the expense of the sAid work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, ano which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lints shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3' maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of En ineor: The City Council of said City by Resolution N —K.-Tias approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •Ergineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. ?• is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report 1s hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. )07 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 w SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time an , n e same manner as County taxes are ' collected. The City Engineer, shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and.said Council will annually conduct- a hearing upon said report at their first.regular..geeting in dune, at which tire assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that ,r on February—J.—M, `iflne nour of pm n�the�City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Lino, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having e5 any objections to tie work-or extent of,the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolutlbn'bf — ° Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a,description of the property to which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Cierk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered, if the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the, property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by y }. written evidence that such signer 1s the owner of the property so described. ?; SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972:' Ail the work herein propo6all be Jone and carried roug n pur<uance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of tho State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution. of Intention: Published notice shall be ma—de pursuan o ec on o e overnmen ode. The mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City (Jerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Datl Re urt, a newspaper of general circulation published ',n the City of On it o, a ornla, and :irculated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, /o a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6. 19BB "an"ger T0: City Council and City City Er,9lnenr PROM: Russel N. Maguire, JuC1 Acosta, Jr. Engineering.Aide 87 -15 and BY: ex Parcel " 106L7, ut the City) DR to Street Approval to Ann heat the at SUBJECT: OR 87 -09 (various loceDistl'throuo 3. 1988 Lighting tithe tecof public thearing for Annexation No. and setting_ RECggENDATIOM adopt the attached resolutions'. setting Council setting Mo. nded tl.at City Annexation Intention to annex the above It is reche the City' apprpy {ng the En9lneer's Report for 1 nce District No. 6. of Dublin hearing regarding described tracts to Street Ltghtln9 the City's olutions declaring Anal sis Back round DR 87_15 and OR 87 -09 Leunctl approval 0617 arDBr 87 Street Lighting Maintenance Attached for City data for intent to annex Parcel hout the City) the public hearin4 Also attached for Council consideration are (various locations throu9 District No. 61as Annexation Batac V 1 of the Engineer's Reports for the rebouary % preliminary PP subjectiannexation Respe f y submitted• C r RHM- -J Attachments 1 109 - RESOLUTION N0. TS-01T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. MIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, on February 3, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City C1_rk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified to any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses to connection therewith, contained in said repart be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desccr beT—fn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon tho subdivisions of land in sTd—Ks—ses'sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report sha'.1 stand as the City Engineer s Report for t— imposes of all subsequent proceecings, and pursuant to the proposed district. Bo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 7 Annexation No. 8 for Parcel Map 10617, DR 87 -21, DR 87 -15 and OR 87 -09 Z C: SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and 111ghwt ide, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 197 SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect on all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on maior streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting district Alt3s Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated In the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street, lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the tubject area. 't SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on ectual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. I - Zone 2 is comprised of all Industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: Lamp Size* No. of Lamps Lamps Annex YTD No. 8 New Loop Total Total Annual SBDOL 9500L 16,ODOL 22,000L 42 - - 2 '-' 42 2 27.5001 _._ - -- .__ *Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation 262 Assessment Units this annex per page 1 84 Total Assessment Units 346 k .1 Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800L 42 X S 8.93 X 12 $4,500.72 9500L 2 X $10.16 X 12 234.84 16,000L - -- X $12.08 X 32 0 22,000L - -- X 513.84 X 12 0 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X 12 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost $4,744,56 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation 262 Assessment Units this annex per page 1 84 Total Assessment Units 346 k .1 �r�.y K'�:fy ��yf fM jy'y�y(se_3 � �t,t��" � Y'iY .W' • _ , i- y'^' "fz �Y`��G.S�{ �� -" -..� C 3. Cost per Assessment Untt: ' ost Sja4.5E S13.71/year/unit TaA un a i Ya in nt antr c ec No. o LS Assessment shall appiy to each lot or yarcel as explained in Section 6. Y SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram, Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to 'this t, report and labeled "Street lighting tiaintenance Dtstrlct'NO. 6•, the text Annexation No. 8. These,diagrams are hereby incorporated within tS? of this report. y SECTIO61 6. Assessment r Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each e unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per.--- _ net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and r determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Ncy, the City Engineer• files a report with the City Council. 5. Every yeas in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, o: modifies and approves the individual assessments. H EXHIBIT "A• " Properties and improvements to be included within P.nnexition No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: °b Assets. No. Of L s to In Annexed • ice' ; Pro ect Am_cge — Unit —• _ _ �• C �, Zone 1 a. :� PH 10517 16.93 34 - -- - -- - -- - -- --- OR 87 -21 6.25 12 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- OR 87 -15 1.64 3 — - -- - -- - -- - -- OR 81 -00 17_40 35 42.22 04 F> ., By ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. B ,r° " CITY OF BANCRO-CUCAMONGA COUldG'I•Y 'QF SA.Y BERNARDINO S i STATE OF, CALIFORNL2 hel ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b AFRAMTION NO.0 U e_, LJ � = FF.-.-- � V-9 L Y P i� NO U 1 lJ) ! 'S lZ L; L - 4rr........ Z p I ..a........+... �R ILI F:alm'l - , Ffll L1111 n sY �Y CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONGA :' . , • ' COUNTY OF BAN BEBNARDINO STATE OF CALEFORNIA T lei ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO. B CITY OF RANCHO CTICAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA �m ;r YI w `t ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM! STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO.6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONGA Coum OF SAN BERNAR uiO STATE OF CAI.IFORNU — T m -� - l� RESOLUTION N0. $8'0 1 q A RESOLUTION OF rdE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT N0. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1072, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience regTre an s e intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district it the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing aescribed work is to be located w t n _roadwW-r-fg-FF`5f-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more oarticularty described on maps which are on file In the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6°. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contempla a wor , In-the opinion o sald City CouncTT7 is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain *Map of Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Va. 6• maps is on file to the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. � nrt of En ineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. • i-ias approve a report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment :ones, titled "Engine er's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. 1s on file to the office of the City Clerk )f said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. 119 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION S. Collection of Asseasmsmo ents: The assessment shall be of tF scollected sm a:anner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6, Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that ' on February, TM. a re hour o pm n the City Council Chambers at 9151 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucammongr., any and all persons having any objection- to the work or extent of the assessment district; may 'appear and show cause why said Mark should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be former in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be In writing and must contain a description of the tpeiht i hei t esi t dtte hesam, and musbe delveredtotheCityClerkof aid Cityprioroth time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shorn upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County a; the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accocpanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all oe done and carried roug in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma —ae pursuant o ect on o o e overroaen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at laast once to The Daily Reppor�t a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a fornla, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. / .2o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January S. 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Parcel Map 10617, DR A7 -21, DR 87 -15, OR 87 -09 and MOR,86 -24 (Industrial /Comaercial) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 12 and setting the date of public hearing for February 3, 1988 R_LOM ENDVION V It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 12 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. AnalysisJBackground Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Parcel Map 10617, OR 87 -21, DR 87 -15, OR 87 -09 and MDR 86 -24 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 12 and setting the public hearing date for February 3, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration 1s a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Oivision. Respectfu ly submitted, RMri: w Attachments RESOLUTION Y.O. $8-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 12 to LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, on January 6, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to male and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912: and WHENLAS, the City Engineer has wads and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS. said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is, sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, squires or should be modified in any respect. R M, THEREFCRE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o?s-a-Mwork and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of thee are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram snowing the Assessment District referred �. to and des—crT9-eTTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saTFNs essment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from s -id work and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report forTFe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. l�2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ANNEXATION 80. 12 For Parrel Map 1u617, OR 87 -21. DR 87 -15, DR 87 -09 and MDR 86 -24 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments Into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown'on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated In the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. 8ased on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.33) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the proiect boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer s Report for the formation of the District. -r ,.e w SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone I and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Y�. rw ..1, c I ,E Y r7 .gym; i :vim �d Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of,landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer-Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th street from west to'east City limit; Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, tram 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to tochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some pmrkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard ovn;lay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 1 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing District Total estimated maintenance cost $2,070 Assessment units 8 r Total cost - assessment unit fu- year and month $2,070 - $258.75 /year or $21.56 /mo. /lot Zone 2 Existing Annexation New District No. 12 Total Total estimated annual -- maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,518.93 51.76 380,576.69 Total cost t assessment unit for year and month 930 • $ 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled •Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. 1 o+ �� - - ;1w.sY, ixt Properties and inpromeents -to be included within Annexation No. 12 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE MDR 86-24 9.54 OR 87 -09 17.40 OR 87 -15 1.64 DR 87 -21. 6.25 PA 10617 16_93 4th Street 51.76 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION NO. 1 e e or• •. n , �i i� -w Area Sa.-n. Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 e e or• •. n , �i i� -w ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION NO. / 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4vKMA ENGINEERING DIVISION T inn VICINITY MAP fl`�If MI) 1 ■: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. 12 Una � 1 Y.nn 1 U I •l Y H D '^"KF 1 l '/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIv(( .gu i C ENGINEERING DIVISION im VICINITY MAP 51 tE U U LJ � �•-�1• L Ww. V•W.r•� I �I 4A♦ 4.. `. I,�j n N <Y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE KAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA z� ENGINEERING DIVISION C �m - VICINITY MAP N 1 1 y r 6 i lTE t � 1 < I . I F w 11' I 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA z� ENGINEERING DIVISION C �m - VICINITY MAP N tl. 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 3 ANNEXATION N0, 12 l f T�, _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAr jl 01--3 ENGINEERING DIVISI6N '' VICINITY MAP N f` ��• y�'S i s �n 1; ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..3 ANNEXATION NO. 12 pp_ VWt e ' o° YJY .RY 1 "'• L MDR TT OF RANCHO CUCA,NIONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION l � VICINITY MAP �. 3 3P ®y Da 87-2z pY' w 4 J JZv�rFnl 'oY ® � p w,p 4 TT OF RANCHO CUCA,NIONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION l � VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 0:2 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO.NGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNE%ATICN TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT HO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Oescri Lion of WOE convenience requ re an s e n en maintenance district in the City of Ran operation of thoss parkways and factlii greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded boundaries of the proposed maintenance hereof. Said maintenance and operation any sartnkler system, trees, grass, pla lighting, structures, and walls in conn That the public interest and of this City Council to form a Cucamonga for the maintenance and thereon dedicated for common ivlsion tract map within the rict described to Section 2 ludes the cost and supervision o.' g;, landscaping. ornamental SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be '• -ated WTI Tn r`oadway r gg -o -wAy and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District Ng. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and mora particularly described on maps whicn are on file rn the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3•. SECTION 3. Descrt tlon of Assessment District: That the contempia ef3 wT In a op n ono sa i y Council. is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho w Cucmaga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. ;, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment dfstrlct and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. RESOLUTION PAGE 2 Res Ofutlon SECTION no. : Re ort of En lneer; The City Council of said City by ort indicates the a cunt of theeproposedpassessment engineer of work which report no. 12 Landscape MalnteRefe a ce 0LtHCd 3; ORDINANCE No 33�. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMNITY ANENONENT 87-D3, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO P.EpUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITY F91LITIES AS SPECIFIED IN THE COMMERCIAL SiANDARDS AND COMMUNITY FACILITY SECTIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain as SECTION 1: The City Couo it hereby finds and determines the following; A. That the Plarning Commission of the City of Rancho + Cucamonga, following a ppublic hearing held in the X ' time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the r' Community Plan text amendment hereinafter described, "e and this City Council has held a public hearing in rs, the time and canner prescribed by lap and duly heard and considared said recommendation. B. That this Community Plan text amendment 1s consistent with the General Plan of the City of « Rancho Cucamonga. ' C. That this Community Plan text amendment 1s i consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The Community Plan text of the Victoria Planned Community is hereby amen n to read as follows: e .e J•> 13y i:' 4!. ?}lam a• 1 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. YCPA 87 -03 v, December 16, 1987 Page 2 A. CONWRCIAL STANDARDS 2. Regional Center a. The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: (1) Retail businesses, including, but not limited to: o department stores o drug stores o jewelry stores o book stores o record stores o hi- fidelity equipment sales o clothing stores o musical in :trument sales o shoe stores o candy stores ^ o photography equipment sales (2) Service businesses, including, but not limited to: o watch and jewelry repair o beauty parlors o travel agencies o locksmiths o banks and financial institutions o movie theaters (3) Administrative and professional offices (4) Commercial recreation (5) Restaurants (6) Nurseries and garden supply stores, provided that fertilizer of anr�yy type shall be sold end stored in packaged form 2y. (7) Public Utility offices (8) Wholesale business offices with sales on the premises, but not to include general storage (9) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses as permitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordieance. (10) Permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241, r - +, `f•7 Y' CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. �Q- YCPA 87 -03 December 16, 1907 _ Page 3 > F b. Uses pomitted subiect to specific approval of Conditional Use Permit: y(1) Animal care facilities, not including kennels v (2) Parking lots and parking buildings (3) Automobile service stations cnd car washes a (4) Automobile sales and service (5) Electric distribution switch stations (6) Commuuicalion euHipment buildings (7) Public utility booster stations (8) Commercial recreation " (9) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses as specifically provided for by the use peWt an4 the zoning ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucaas.nga. (10) Conditionally permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241. { t CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No.-'- YCFA 87 -03 December 16, 1987, Page 4 P v` 3. Regional Related Lend Uses a. The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: (1) Retail business, including but not limited to: o department stores o furniture stares o automobile sales 0 pet stores 0 motorcycle sales and service e home improvement, center C hardware stores o grocery stores 0 clothing stores o meat markets or delicatessens (2) Service business, including but not limited to: o banks, financial institutions o automobile repair c blueprinting and photostatint o cleaning and pressing business o laundries o locksmiths o mortuaries o mechanical auto wash o plumbing supply 0 movie theaters o photographic supplies or studios o equipment rental (3) Administrative and pnfessional offices (4) Restaurants (6) Ctmmercial (6) Automobile service facilities (7) Nurseries and garden supply stores, provided that fertilizer of any type be stored and sold in packaged form only (8) Public utility offices <_ ,• 139 n .. Y fi1H' )j r 1 da.. � CITY 'COUNCIL Op0IN4N:E WO., YCPA 67 -03 December 16, 1937 Page 5 .f (9) Hotels and motels (10) Self= service laundry and self - service dry cleaning facilities (11) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses as permitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance (12) Permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241. c. Uses permitted subject to a Conditional Use Permit: (1) Animal care facilities (2) Public utility booster stations (3) Parking lots and parking buildings (4) Public utility exchange and substations (5) Public buildings (6) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses as specifically provided for by the use permit (7) Conditional permitted Cmmunity Facilities listed on Page 241. Isa .d = rK•a i ,.b r �y CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE MO> VCPA 67 -03 1 Decc-abet 16, 1987 Page 6 — • �� s t39 y O. COMMUNITY FACILITIES a« The Community Facilities section of the Victoria Community Plan is fiC, established to provide for community support uses and those sy additional uses which are found to be compatible with the basic ,. permitted uses by the Sit& Plan Review Process procedure. 1. Uses Permitted - The following uses shall be permitted within Residential and Commercial Land Use areas in Victoria: ' a. Small Family Day Care in the home, providing care for six (6) or less persons. my b. Public Park and Playground y;- c. Genoral Open Space uses. ` d. Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above as provided for in the Rancho }. Cucamonga Development Code. rm 2. Conditionally Permitted Uses - The following uses shall be ` permitted within Residential or Commercial Land Use areas in Victoria subject to the Conditional Use Permit process: P a. Church s b. Club, lodge, fraternity and sorority c. Convalescent center d. Public facility e. Large Family Day Dare in the home, providing care for 7 -12 persons. ` f. Child Care centers g. Fire and police station h. Outdoor recreation I. Schools, private and parochial J• Utility or service facility t39 STAFF REPORY DATE: January 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 41 FOR OR 85 -06 (PCL. 3 OF PM 8345) LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECOMMEAOATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 41 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 41 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for OR 85 -06 (pcl. 3 of PM 8345) located on the north side of Arrow Route, west of Haven Avenue. The developer of the subject project has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 81 -648. Respec Ily submitted. RHM:JA:dlw Attachments /W1 4 J-1 ��" RESOLUTION NO. S8- 012 .. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0, 41 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 85 -06 (PCL. 3 OF PARCEL MAP 8345) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of December, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -649 to order the therein describes work in connection with Annexation No. 41 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -649 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the ddoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file to the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to ail persons owning real p °operty proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolut,:" of Intention No. 87 -649, according to the nags and addresses of such owners a; the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed to the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file to the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It 1s hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga t at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described 1n said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -649, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is e�reby finally approved; and SECTION 3• Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment n e ngineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin untMaMe� 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 7 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 41 for OR 85 -06 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No.l. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within OR 85 -06 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, It is estimated that maintenance costs for assessr. nt purposes will equal thirty ($.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Including Annexation No. 41 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No. 41 Total Landscape Area 920,152 0 920,152 No. of 0. U. 9,279 124 9,403 1, Per Lot Annual Assessment 920 152 x 5.30 $29.35 — j'"9 -, JOa . � f♦ Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation Involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION S. Assessment Oiacram A copy of the proposed assessment, diagram is attached to this report and labeled ,;Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram 1s hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment lotslwithinntthesDistrict andtthat ssesosmenttshaliobegequallforneach unit.l Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the._ number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 10T2. SECTION 7. Drder of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of r.lty Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers ail testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, tie City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5 Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. a:` d • � -V r. t -42 Properties and laprovements to be included within Annexation No. 41 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: MAINTAINED AREA A55E55. - MbINJD COVER PROJECT UNITS STREET Sit• ice_♦: -' DR 85 -06 pcl 3, PM 8345) 248 0 .5) 124 - -- .._ - -- 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LAN ')SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. -}I 51T� fta l" CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA w a• t 1 \\ ENGINEERING DIVISION w T VICINITY MAP lv �m y MITE 8TH STREET W 2 6 � Q Z D J Q m U C 6 SAN BERNARDIN FREEWAY 51T� fta l" CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA w a• t 1 \\ ENGINEERING DIVISION w T VICINITY MAP lv �m y CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.NIONGA STAFF REPORT ` s . � r DATE: January 6, 1g88 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORr, IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 11 FOR DUS NORTHWEST LO P14ATE�(INTRIAL /COf IA) TO LANDSCAPE NO. 3 RECOMMEADATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance Di.trict No. 3 R w t Avenue (Industrial/ Commercial). developer of the subject project has been notified of the public hearing Ity mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's keport tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87 -650. WR s bmitted, Est 2V / RHM :JA:diw Attachments z. i `, y RESOLUTION No. Se- O']3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE NAINTEHAMCE DISTR' -T NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR .a, 86 -39 2nd day of Dec5ember, 1987Cadopt the oRancho ntention No 87-651 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 11 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. e7 -651 law, shy by theaAlffidavit ofd Publication mof said Resolution of required by on file in the office of the City Clerk; and Resolution of�Intention, headed °Noticehof Imytovement•f was duly and said posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereuf, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property Proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -651, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears n the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and Council havin WHEREAS, said oral and documentary, concerning the proce:ding vidence concernin derived therefrom andisail CityhCouncilmhaving nowkacquired 3ur1 diiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -651, be done and made; and SECT'„d 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer si e— i�reFy finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessmen n e nginear's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unt a ter 0 percent of said tracts have been occupied. -2 x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape 14ainterance District No. 3 Annexation No. 11 For DR B6 -39 SECTION 1. Authorit_ Y foraoort 1, Division 15tofsthe Streets andwHinghwaysrequirements Cde. ate of California Chapter (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. Dereral� Descron velopments into Landscape This City Council has elected to annex all new de Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All ers maintained the annexed r on the recordelandscaped map asroadwayrigyt of -way oreasemestobe grantedto the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Spocifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated ingtheeconditionslof approval for the development and as approved by he City Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and SECTION 4. Estimates Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will estimated) square per year. ctual ostedata. are Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October S. 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. R Zone 2 1s comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east-City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median Islands on other major divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Including Annexation ND. 11 is as follows. Zone 1 S Total estimated maintenance cost r Assessment units 51 total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Assessment units, acres Total cost ♦ assessment Existing District $2,070 a S2- '_070 525- 8.75 /year or S2_ 1.56/mo. Existing Annexation New District No. 11 Total 0 0 0 380,517.93 1.0 380,518.93 unit for year and month 0 xxS. • 5 0 /year 0 /mo. Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Olaaram labeled 'Exhibit A •,obysthissreferencedtherdiagra Ischereby incorporatedad within the text of this report. „ r ' na•,fr r' SECTION 6. Assessaient r• lots hwiithinmthesDistrict Andtthat Assesosmentshallobef�equellfor each'"g reel ., for Zone 1 and shall be equal-to the next acreage for each'lot- or "parcal in Zone 2. ykv' ?i The City Council will hold a public heart— in June, to detersdne the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incur"" by the City during the �k pprovfous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required _ by the Landscape and Liahtine Art of 11372_ SECTION 7, order of Events ' I. C1 Council adc is Resolution of Preliminary U P ry Approval of City Engineer's t. Report. %3 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex r. Of strict and sets public hearing date. a fxt 3. City Council conducts public hP.aring, considers all testimony and ~ determines to Annex to the Ofstrict or abandon the proceedings. t 4. Every ry Year in Kay, the City Engineer files a report with, the City Councii. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. i 4� (i (f Properties and Inprovewnts to be included within Annexation No,11 tr (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE OR 86-39 1.0 (pcl 2, PM 8060) IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION NO. 1 Blr .m �d �a Area Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 Blr .m �d �a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. II ARROW HIGHWAY ?4&-SL MM pe.e FARM sp 2 W a y Z � � o h s LOUIS M c.4Nrs R k ��, No Dt a <' °a 1�¢s .. ;a UfL• +o,C+ "t+fo did Qfs vyflor I aw 6 • Elfr�.1LY y, 9th Street \C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w , \` [)R R6 -39 M ENGINEERING DIVISION w T nn VICINITY MAP 1� C ,� I CITY OF RANCHO CUCABI014GA STAFF REPORT R d -t2 s LJ ♦� ,t 3. DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONAECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 34 FOR TRACT NO. 13444, OR 85 -06 AND DR 66-39 (VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECOMMENDATION: - It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 34 to Street Lighting M•'- lance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. EACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work In connection with Annexation No. 34 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract `NO: 13444, OR 85 -06 and DR 86 -39 (various locations throughout the City). The developer of the subject developments has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively, approved' by Resolution No. 37 -652. Respectf y submitted, RHM: Attachments r RESOLUTION NO. $S -OZy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 34 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13444, OR 85 -06 and DR 86-39 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of December, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -653 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 34 to_ Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -653 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement% was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -653, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Nailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It 1s hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -653, be done aid made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's a —kpot are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CuCANOPGA t for Street Lig Ling Maintenance District No. 1 Tract No. 13444, OR 85 -06 and OR 86 -39 SECTION I. Authors v for Report This oof the Streets and Hequiresments of Article 4, Calffornia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General De� Street This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Lighting Maintenance aa City lAlhas de ermin dtha hereetlghtsto be'slntined ilhave aneffect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights, Nock to be provided far with the district are: assessments established by the The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street ]I ht sttrrerets)assshownnonrthe LlghtingtmDiistrict AltasaMapcwhichtis consldaredtof general benefitrto all Oveemeninmainteiance is areas cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Sp_ eon iii_ ca�ti�ns The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are roved ppas stipulated in the Engineering Divisional Referenceeislheerreeby madeatoathe subjectttract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement,. providing for the illumination of the subject area. is8 d SECTION 4. Estimated Casts No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single femtly, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional < projects throughout the city. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, cowerclal and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerm• Cost: *High Pressure Sodium vapor No. of Lamp Size Total Lamps Rate Ho's Lamps 5800L 444 X S 8.93 X Lamps Annex New Lap Lamp Size* YTD No 34 Total 56COL 444 - -- 444 9500L 477 - -- 477 16,000L 1 - -- 16 22,000L 3 - -- 3 27.SODL 6 YTO Assess 6 *High Pressure Sodium vapor Lamp Size Total Lamps Rate Ho's Total Annual Maint. Cost 5800L 444 X S 8.93 X 12 • S 47,579.04 9500L 477 X $10.16 X 12 58,155.84 16.ODOL 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,000L 3 X $13.84 X 12 498.24 27,500 6 X $15.31 X 12 _2,939.52 Total Annual Haint. Cost $111,492.00 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 14,888 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 302 Total Assessment Units 15,190 r ,r 3. Cost er Assessaent Unit• iotat Mnuel Metntenanee Cost o, o n s n s rc N -01 $7,34 • /Year /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot er parcel as explained In 5 SECTION S. Asse nt Dfa ram Section 5, MnerCopies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are at vitfon N beled •Street Lighting Hafntenance 01str1ct No. I• text of 34• These diagra are lathed td this this report, hereby incorporated SECTION 6, within the Assessment unity VIMfs for the District are found unit. When u� {u are ard asses be of eneral benefit to net acre. sment shall be equal for each 9 , assessment w111 be 2 units per SECTION 7, Order of I• City i Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Engineers Report 2. Ci Approval of City sets Council adopts Resolution Of Intention Public hearing date, to annex a District and 3• Cite Council tocro ucns0iublicthearing, considers all testf determines 4• Ever abandon the Proceedings. and Council. in NAy, t City Engineer files a 6 approves, are�n June report Kith the City d the City conducts a ublic hearin g and modifies an approves the individual p assessments. /.;I 1 EVISIT W Properties and I rovemnts to be included within Annexation No. 34 to Street L19hting Haintenance District 1: S Project Assess. No. of La z to be Annexed _ )_ Amaae unit Zone 1 TR 13444 176 _._ ___ DR 85 -06 (248 9 .5) 124 - "- ~" (ppel 3 of "- - -- __ _ PN 8345) Zone 2 r ' DR 86 -39 1.0 2 " "" °- " "" " (Pcl 2 of PM 8060) 302 _ i Y ■ +ate ASSESSMENT.- DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.:L AMEXATION NO. 24 517 CITY OF RANCHO cLrA agcA A �R A5 06 j ENGINEERING IC NITY MAP w T slum STN STREET W t 4 3 S u sew EERRSROi tR r 517 CITY OF RANCHO cLrA agcA A �R A5 06 j ENGINEERING IC NITY MAP w T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 34' ARROW HIGHWAY ?*&." MM OW&O PARtft fp RIrOIN QM.•O.M• � V 'L Douro M ��tNFf NBt Rob N.« No DR VR&rO.C4 ",71f. 7.d 9rj aaaff 9th Street t " CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONCA ENGINEERING DIVISION t�m VICINITY MAP 11 e W Q _W Il a i� e_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jdnior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 FOR DR 86-39, NORTHWEST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND HELMS AVENUE DISTRICT TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ISTRI RECOMMENDATION: It is recocnended that City Council approve :ha attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance district No. 6 and 'approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUNO /ANALYSIS Attached for City Councii approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for DR 86 -39, northwest corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue notifiedi of Ctheepublic hearing by email f the The attached eproject e oliaton also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87 -654. Respect mitten ^ RHM:JAA:dlw Attachments /63 N ■ v� 9' -A 1 to i RESOLUTION NO. H 7- OZ S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 86 -39 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did an the 2nd day of December, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -655 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -655 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of ImprovemenN, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by -law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, afte- the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -655, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concernins the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public Interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -655, be done and made; and SECT104 2: Th- Report filed by the Ecgincer Is hereby finally approved; a—nr— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e— pure hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trot —cls We been occupied. �6Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance Oistr• , No. 6 Annexation No. 7 for DR 86 -39 a SECTION 1. Authority for Report s, This report is in compliance with the requirements of Ar "cl. 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Hi hwaeyys Code, State of v California (Landscaping and Li Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description .b This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots uithin said deveicpmants as woli as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prrpared by the developers. Th6 plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for strett lighting improvement on the Individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any imp•ovement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement , construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, s actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 has been demarcated into �c two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each-dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: *High pressure Sodium Vapor Total Lamp Size Lamps Rate 5800L 42 X $ 8.93 X 9500E 2 X $10.16 X 16,OOOL - -- X $12.08 X 22,OOOL - -- x $13.84 X 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X Total Annual Maint. Cost 2. Total Assessment Units: Total Annual No. of Maint. Cost 12 $4,500.72 Lamps 243.04 Lamm Size* Lamps YTO Annex No. 7 New Lamp Total 12 0 SBD0L 41 1 42 9500L 2 --- 2 16,OOOL 22,000E 27.500L --- --- .._ *High pressure Sodium Vapor Total Lamp Size Lamps Rate 5800L 42 X $ 8.93 X 9500E 2 X $10.16 X 16,OOOL - -- X $12.08 X 22,OOOL - -- x $13.84 X 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X Total Annual Maint. Cost 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation - Assessment Units this annex per page 4 Total Assessment Units $4,744.56 260 7a !-v .c z Total Annual Po's Maint. Cost 12 $4,500.72 12 243.04 12 0 12 0 12 0 YTD Assess Units before this annexation - Assessment Units this annex per page 4 Total Assessment Units $4,744.56 260 7a !-v .c z ' i 262 �^�axr • _ ..- , ;•.,_a+L:..�+,e __ ... - �" ; r- n �o `any -ac-- n 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: - Total Anmjal Msintenance Cost S4 744.56 518.10 /yeer /unit No. o. o n s n s r c aTb2— Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the +proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Naintenance District No.'60, Annexation No. 7. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. !' SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units-per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events e' 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r 0 F SI EXHIBIT `A' Propartfes and improvements to be included within Annexation Mo. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Assess. No. of LaQs_to be Annexed Pro ect Acreage Unit 5e011�95DOL ms Zie,uum Z1,50UL Zone 1 M', Zone 2 OR 86 -39 1.0 2 1 (pcl 2 of PM 8060) mew .. i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 17 ARROW HIGHWAY PACJI AAM fb•• }nacre fz hogs" t x V x iou�e M [AlNfl No De ♦a ` Rf• N,« Un�•O. C� antes 7�d 4fa• wi N� 9th Street 'a _W CITY OF RANCHO CUCPA'ONGA DR Rb 39 j7 ENGINEERING DIVISION w T L ti��tn6� VICINITY MAP lv 1 DATE: TO, PROM, BY, SUBJECT, STAFF REPORT January 6, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager Jerry B. Pulwood, Resource Center Coordinator Staff recommends that City Council approve the Resolution confirming the amended assessments at the clasp of the public hearing EVALUATIONS The Street and Highway Code Part 10, Section 8730 through Section 8734 under Division of Land and Bond provides procedures for the apportionment of assessments necessitated by the division of land. The attached Resolution confirms the amended assessments following the close of the public hearing The Public Hearing Notice has been published twice in a local newspaper as speciCied in the Streets and Highway Code Part 10, Section 8730 through Section 8934 Respectfully submitted, Ro�tA R1 o. Assistant C ty Manager RAR:JBP,sgr Attachment: Resolution Confirming Amended Assessments Reapportionment and Redistribution of Assessmento /%0 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1R FOR PARCEL MA-1 10543 AND PARCEL MAP 10008. WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously confirmed assessments in a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of said code, said special assessment_ district known and designated as,ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 82 -IR (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessmsnt District") and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and /or percale of land upon which there are unpaid assessments have been apportioned or divided, and this legislative body did receive a Reapportionment Report and proposed amended assessment and did set a public hearing on the amended assessment, all as authorized pursuant to the provisions of Part 10 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915"1 and, WHEREAS, at this time all notices have been given an required toy laws all persons interested in the original assessment, or in the lands affected thereby, or in tho bonds secured thereby, did at the time of the public hearing, hear and determine all objections to the division of the assessments, and, this legislative body is now desirous to proceed to confirm the amended assessments NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWSs SECTION i That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 That the amended assessment contained in the "Reapportionment Report" is hereby approved and confirmed by this legislative body SECTIO;i 3 The City Clerk shall, immediately upon adoptlon of this Resolution, cause the followings , A. File a copy of the Amended Assessment Report, as confirmed, with the County Auditor, who shall annually thereafter enter upon the assessment roll the installments coming due on each component part of the original parcel opposite a description of the respective parcels no assessed �7/ wVy,..y —s 4 •sr �' � `ye J�T ,VJ�v4 °' C' CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ' _ PM 10547 6 PM 10008 January 6, 1988 Pago 2 ,�. 1. a _ aid ° B. The amount charged for fees and costs as shown on the amended assessment as to each, ac parcel shall be entered upon the assessment 'n ode roll and shall be collected along -with the ate, first Installment of the amended assessment. C All amounts collected for fees and costs of s the reapportionment shall be deposited in the General Fund of the City. - - r% D. The amended assessment roll and diagram shall immediately be recorded in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets. E A cupy of the amended assessment diagram shall immediately be filed in the Office -of -- the County Recorder, and said amended diagram shall cross reference the original assessment diagram for the Assessment District. Said amended diagram shall contain the information as set forth in Section 8734 of the Streets and Highways Code. =' i R *av sp. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January °d, 1988 Emu TO, Mayor and Mombers of the City Council ; PROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator SUBJECT: Asnroval of Resolution Confirming Amended Aseesemcnts for Tract Mao 13118 within the•Storm Drain Channel Assasnment District 186 -21 RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that City Council approve the Resolution confirming the amended assessments at the close of the public hearing EVALUATION, The Street and Highway Code Part 10, Section 8730 through 'action 8731 under Division of Land and Bond provides procedures for the apportionmeut of assessments necessitated Ly the division of land Tho attached Resolution confirms the amended assessments following tho close of the public hearing. The Public Hearing Notice has been published twice in a local newspaper as specified in the Streets and Highway Code Part 10, Section 8730 through Section 8934. R`Z�bev�t t[ully submitted, f�. o As sistay Manager RAR:JBF:sgr Attachment: Resolution Confirming Amended Assessments Reapportionment and Redistribution of Assessments 1 ?3 s 9 - RESOLUTION NO 9?-0;17 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND = CONFPIRMINO AMENDED ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSM3NT DISTRICT' 86 -2 FOR TiACT MAP 13118 WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANC17 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has,previously; confirmed assessments in a special assesnment district pureuant-to'tho 6rlis-and provieioris of the ' 'Municipal Improvement Act of 19130, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Coda %if the.State•of California, and Fonds were issued to,represint the costs for , unpaid -aosossments pursuant to the,tersis and provisicns oflthe -Improvement Bond Act - of 19150, being'Division 10 of said code; said special assessment district know and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86 -2 (hereinafter referred to as the -Assessment District') and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and /or parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assl,ssmanta have been apportioned-or_ dividod, and this legislative bcdy did receive a Reapportionment Report and proposed amended assessment and did oat a public hearing on the amended assessment, all as authorized pursuant to the provisions of Part 10 of the - Improvement Bond Act of 1915.1 and, WHEREAS, at this time all notices have been given as required by laws all persons interested in the original assessment, or in the lands affected thereby, or in the bonds secured thereby, did at the time of the public hearing, hear and determine all objections to the division of the assessments, and, this legislative body is now desirous to proceed to confirm the amended assessments NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS, SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 That the amendod asressment contained in the -Reapportionment Report' is hereby approved and confirmed by this legislative body. SECTION 3 The City Clark shall, immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, cause the following, A File a copy of the Amended Assessment Report, as confirmed, with the County Auditor, who shall annually thereafter enter ion the assessment roll the installments coming due on each component part of the original parcel opposite a description of the respective parcels so assessed nq 1� ■ z�v -'A 14�� jr CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION TRACT MAP 13118 W, January 6,'1988 Z. Page 2 i i B. The amount charged for fees and costs as shown an the amended asnessment,,az tojeach parcel shall be antered.upon,ths:'aisessment tii roll and shall be c;llectod:long,'With,,,th9 first installment o tSa amended assessment. i;' ,All amounts collected foi fees and costs of the i sippoitiioniient:"stiall"be dep6sited in the.- General Fund of the City C. D The imerid;d assessment roll and.d1agram shall immediately be recorded In the,Office of the Superintendent of Streets. E A copy of the amended assessment diagram shall immediately be filed In the Office of the County Recorder, and said amended diagram shall cross reference the -original assessment diagram for the Assessment District. Said amended diagram shall contain the information as not forth in Section 8734 of the Streets and Highways Code. I-)S* t 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ; STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 ! . TO: City Cour. ^11 and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofs, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Developmnt Review 86 -27 - a orn a n s s- Appeal OT ZM ann ng Commission's decision requ ring undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along 7th Street for a proposed warehouse addition In the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the southeast corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street (APM 209- 262 -13) Staff reco®ends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision and deny the Appeal of undergrounding overhead utilities along 7th Street. 11. BACKGROUND: The project consists of a 13,700 square foot warehouse addition as shown on Exhibit "8' (Site Plan). The project was conditionally approved by the City Planner on September 23, 1987. The Conditions of Approval included the requi. nt for undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities on the project side of both 7th Street and Center Avenue as shown on Exhibit 'C'. On November 25, 1987, the Developer appealed to the Planning Commission the Conditions of Approval requiring the undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities along both 7th Street and Center Avenue. The Planning Commission did delete the requirement for undergrounding of utilities along Center Avenue, but upheld the requirement to underground the existing overhead utilities along 7th Street (Exhibit 'D'). The Developer's letter req,jestingg the deleSici of the requirement to underground the overheat utilitio• c`on, 7t Street is attached as Exhibit "E'. 0(o F CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT _ OR 86 -27 - California Finished Metals Jancary 6, 1998 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS: The Developer feels the cost of undergroundfng the utilities along the project side of 7th Street is 'out of scale' with the cost of the proposed expansion. The initial cost 'of undergrounding the utilities,along 7th Street will be wholly the responsibility of the Developer. However, the Developer will be entitled to one -half reimburscnont of the cost -of undergrounding upon future development on the north side of 7th Street. Staff does not know the cost of the proposed on -site improvements; however, the current vndergroundtng po tey does not specifically exempt projects based on the cost of undergrounding versus the cost _ .. of the proposed project. The recent decision by the Planning Commission to delete the undergroundfng of overhead utilities along Center Avenue did reduce the total cost to approximately 24f of the original cost. In addition, this figure will be reduced to less than 129 upon reimbursement from future development on the north side of 7th Street. IV. CONCLUSION: The undergrounding requirement is consistent with current policy. In addition, the Planning Commission did relieve the Developer of a rather large portion of the initial undergroundfng oblf9etion. Therefore, staff feels the requirement to underground utilities along 7th Street is apprupriuto and reasonable. Raspeetf submitted, w el RAM: Attachments: Vicinity Ma (Exhibit 'A') Site Plan (Exhibit 08') Existing Overhead Utilities (Exhibit 'C) P.C. Minutes November 25, 1987 (Exhibit 'D') Developer's Letter (Exhibit 'E') Conditions of Approval 177 ' -a .:r ray;, 7rH STREET i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDUMMMO DZVMON V nna- S /TE PLAN " M �1 K e tj �: I 1 _ WS 1JE4/ ADD), 1 ED i ^T_. 1 1 1 1 1; �� _ifs . •f. . 1 �• 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDUMMMO DZVMON V nna- S /TE PLAN " M �1 K v Q eta ci a .v� c Irm—tA 3 Ak Sx T y � U V a .v� c Irm—tA pv:/c/J/ s/7 U Y 1$0 :i -x,• 8 V w V i U�•p� .g i, 3 Ak Sx pv:/c/J/ s/7 U Y 1$0 :i -x,• 8 V w V i U�•p� .g i, S L S H. APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -27 - CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS - appeal or 0 ons o prove rcqu r ng u ergrou ng of utilities along 7th Street and Center Avenw for the develornt of a warehouse addition in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the southwest corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209462 -13. Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Chairman McNial opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Mitchell, representing California Finished Metals, 9330 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, reviewed the reasons for their request for exemption of the requirement of the undergrounding of utilities. Mr. Mitchell referenced that this was an expansion to an existing building, the economic costs, and also the surrounding land uses. Mr. G. Hemonower, General Manager of California Finished Metals, stated he was not against undergrounding utilities, but feels discrimination in the requirement for undergrounding in this project. Undergrounding the' utilities would double the cost of the project. r ;FZ4FT CJrl Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea addressed the aesthetic concerns on the truck loading area and expressed her concern about dropping the requirement for the undergrounding of utilities in this case. Commissioner Blakesiey felt that the undergrounding costs seam to be out of proportion with the nature of the modification to the building. Commissioner Emerick expressed the Compromising position of undergrounding on Seventh Street but not on Center Street would seem appropriate. Chairman McN1el stated that in Design Review one of the problems was this was a metal addition and there is a policy in the City regarding metal buildings. Sinco this was an upgrade to the building, this metal building was accepted. With respect to undergrounding, a compromise might be made. Chairman McN1ei questioned Engineering if there was development on Center Street. Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, that approximately 3/4 is developed or, the west side. Commissioner Chitiea moved deleting Condition 18, the .quirement of undergrounding utilities on Center Avenue, Commissioner Dlakesley seconded the motion. Motion caeried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY November 25, 1987 * * ` + • • Planning Commission Meeting )lit EXHIBIT woe OARY M/TC HELi ; ASSOCIATES CN `O FLANNINO . ENOINEERINO C►n' D RtNC110 CUCANp • . AD 110 ACA ,� ea'<uNr, I4N�NO nl DEC 041987 a. cA i W mw nor DecembeC �, 1987 P-0 Y 9 f Rancho Cu camonva Rancho �oamon", CA 9170, AMj 1�� re Cr. A HEI;� �j(��.un RE: APP,wAL K CALIWO TOI(jTzt z7 CONNIS3 PORN, UTILI?y ION g Honor obis A FINISHED RXTALS "4DIIpGLIORON are h HaYOr and City Council Nembers� On behalf of deterereby requs our client calif ilItynaltiltOn tote 9; AA APPea)aoff�rnla Finished the Upgrade entheFinl*hod Netthe Bout un° de pofdlnp0 tNetaalcnNSa POra on Bout a cu omm! ha Qinaliy con true�edf Its In been requ f Seventh StreetQ call City) � an iln� Prior to aI facil Y the City tz Part i of no sare�nja� !none mtl ungscaPlnp, !a°orporatloo Jc was i bul ltlln a minor C °f structural decor the ° its Pana411 roof me bulldinp aelev screen ex utillty fj! Ia that �therno bin their teX a�JPment)atlone, aCon°mI !IS antler s aCOndm dary, latlnQ . as a al pond^!ltonisiofde °v0°ttlsugh Call oral the °c scale! jlh Finished are Owtff of ta,ret�o ndlnC mpaelq� �+hichohiv3' r�lyi Withd Notale the oneltlar the en Ire he eiffect oof i t I °n�fortedl by tthe expansion Utility Proprsln0 the aPPllcant L17T OF a 4 Na CHO CMAMONGA '� � 4 (} � D & DltVG�pp�A$S N�OIP P�R'L v k x7 , r t ,s r is C STAFF REPORT cn Y Q 2 u em DATE: January 6. 1988 TO: Mayor ano Members of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroutil. Deputy City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBIECT: ENVIROWEMYAL ASSES9IEMT AND CONDITIONAL USE PEEPRMIT- 7 -OS ann ng oms ss on s c son approv ng o b900 square - foot sanctuary building adno a 2300 square an, extended day classroom bu riding; Residential preschool dess5than 2 dwelling unitseper acre) Low of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APR: 227-061 -03 1. pffAls "11ON: Uphold the Planning Commission approval of an ono se Permit 87 -06 with conditions as approved by the Commission. Dp II. BACKGROUND' oor Condltionatt Use Permit 87-05 PianTheg PP® canto ^is specifically appealing two conditions of approval• Planning and Engineers g o ^Condition No. 3 gregarding the use completl n ofleVista Street with a temporary cul -de -sac. III. ANALYSIS: A. Peannl a Divtssamy a dotttonema erlalrn shall f be submittedemfor Planning Division approval prior to issuance of budding permits." The applicant is proposing a wood shake roof. Through the processing of the project, staff believed that the use of wood shake roofing was in compliance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Design Review Committee felt that since specific "shake.... in h for Etiwanda (Page 5 -43) that se architectural roofings the churchwereinscompliance well ith as all proposed for 113 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT _ "• RE: CUP 87 -05 - APPEAL January 6, 1988 Page 2 e However, the Planning Commission, at the meeting of November 25, 1987, was concerned about approving any project that would be contrary to their current policy which requires concrete or g clay tile roofing for any new projects in residential areas. Therefore, this project was approved by the Commission after they determined that the structure, even though it is within the area of the Etimndd Plan, would not be exempt from the 3 tile roof policy. B. En ineerir Condition No. 3: Vista Street. abutting the east• property line or re project site shall be completed with a temporary cul -de -sac, 18 fort radius within the existing street width, designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is current City policy to extend temporary `dead -end' stub streets upon future development or finish the stub streets with• a turn around (cul -de -sac). The installation of a cul -de -sac serves the following purposes: 1. It allows traffic to turn around without pulling into private driveways or caking several nanuvers within the public street. 2. It allows City street sweepers, which require a 15' radius, to sweep the total curb length eliminating debris build up in corners. 3. It provides a finished aesthetically pleasing appearance to the and of the street. t 'A' shows to turn around, but is somewlal Darkways. Alternative 8 is less pies but will accommodate a street tw( beyond the existing curbs into the i the least disruptive to existing accommodate street sweepers. The states the following reasons for not at the end of Vista Street: s that have been used to ity. Alternative A 1s ,rgest radius for vehicles disruptive to adjacm!t rable for vehicle turning, !per and doas not extend rrkway. Alternative C is p2rkwaysi but does not Developers appeal latter constructing a curved curb 1. A circular turnaround would be inconsistent with recent decisions in that exact neighborhood. 2. The residents on the street aro opposed to the circular turnaround because- rt) it eliminates good curb side parking, and tb) it would cause an undesired traffic impact. )'a4 0 f ro j;. i; CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 87 -05 - APPEft January 6, 1908 Page 3 The Developer end one of the NI sta Street residents presented these reasons to the Planning Commission who decided that Alternative B was most appropriate. Staff's response to the Developer's reasons for not constructing a codified cul-de-sac: 1. Inconsistent with Neighborhood: The Developer is reTerring —to a Planning Tssion dec'sion made on October 8, 1986, relating to the Mormon Church proiect located approximately 350 feet to the south of this proiect. The Commission allvaed Alternative C because of the overwhelming resistance of the residents to a circular finish to tug street. 2.a. Parking Restrictions: Alternative B, as required, will ave limitea impact upon parking because only 18' of the street frontage will be taken up with the turn around. 2.b ":ko Attachment,: esired Tic paen ct: on Staff has found that in e cases a Fes Im s some streets are under ppeerception that the curve will invite itional traffic to use their street to turn und. The 18' radius, used in Alternative B, is small to allow convenient turning of cost icles except compact cars and street ,weepers; retort, staff feels that very few additional icles will use the street. ted, 11 plicant's Letter of Appeal Planning Commission Staff Report of November 25, 1987 Planning Commission Minutes of November 25, 1987 Exhibit 0 - Temporary Cul -De -Sac Designs I 85' Crass a r C'rauln ;01eA�' r l9ECE1GE,0 f=4- Lutheran Church m OF RANCHO CUCAMOhCA X�,%Ayl ADMINISTRATION 1r)at6) —. Cif RanC%10 CUCaMonga DEC 041987 Richard A Nelson, Pastor December 4, 1987 CITY OF Rancho Cucamonga P.Q. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJRCI': OOKDITISMAL = POIRT 87 -05 - CROSS 8 CWM To Whoa It May Concern, t� The above project was approved at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission meeting of November 25. 1987. Although,as of today, we have received no copy of the resolution, we wish to appeal two amendments to the original resolution that were made at that meeting. Having no numbers or pages to refer to from approved resolution, please allow us to relate to these two items by name. Our first condition that we want to appeal regards the change of our 'roofing material from a heavy, Grade A. wood shake to a c:ncreta or the to "simulate" a shake look. It should be noted that the wood shake, as submitted, does meet all demands of code, and has the highest possible burn rating. Both the Design Review Committee and the city staff (including Fire Dept.) approved of our use of this material. Architecturally, we feel the use of anything less natural will definitely take away from the integrity of "Barn" style. We feel .. nave complied .ith the spirit and letter of the Etivands Specific Plan, and we make reference to the following sections in this Specific Plan: Page 5-40, item .202..." traditional, rather than contemporary" "rustic, rather they polished" Page 5-43, item .702c... "rustic, informal" .103 ........ shall be consistent with design theme." Page 5-45, see the picturee 8 item .802, regarding "Barn Style" Page 5-47, paragraph 4 d item 5.52 regarding meeting "fire protection standards". Our second appeal regards the ruling that we would construct a "modified culdesac" at the rear of our property line at Vista St. Not only is it Inconsistent with recent decisions in that exact neighborhood 8 building projects, the neighbors are strongly opposed to doing this. A curved culdesac eliminates good curbside parking for those neighbors and spells "a turn - &round for traffic " -- &a it will be the only such culdesac in that neighborhood. We agree that the residents should not experience this undesired Impact on their neighborhood 8 traffic. We would prefer to land- scape the area immediately seen from the end of Vista along our block wall and leave the street the way its been fcr over 22 years) Thankyou for giving these appeals your consideration, and we await word on when we should appear for the hearing. ' Sincerely..4 Rev. Richard A. Nelson, Pastor 977919th Street o Stator Bros. Center- 191h It Archibald a RancroCucamonpa.CA91701 a (714)9894991 1810 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 26, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Neier, Associate Planner - - -itr - - s ' �• re SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIOIIA USE PERMIT 87 -05 square TOOr Sanctuary u ing and a 2,300 square foot office and classroom building; and operate an extended day nursery and preschool on 5 acres of land to the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 6723 Ettwanda Avenue - APN 227 - 061 -03. I PROJECT AMD SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, conceptual gradin ,Tan, concep ut&Mandscape plan, building elevations, preschoo, activities and issuance of a Negative Declaration for development of the Cross and Crown Lutheran Church. B. Surrounding Land Use and 2ontn North - r n nn ree ouseF Plan acility. Etiwarda Specific South - Existing Single Family Residential with horse corrals; Ettwanda Specific Plan Esst - Existing Single Family Residential; Ettwanda Specific Plan Nest - vacant Land; Ettwanda Specific Plan C General Plan Designations: ro ecSite - very LOW Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Lew Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) 181) ITEM N PLANNING COMIISSI% STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -05 - CROSS a CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The curre.R use of the site is citrus grove. Ana &Tu —raf ground slopes north to south at an approximate 3 percent grade. There are four pale trees along Etiwanda Avenue frontage which are protected as historical landsarks. there are Eucalyptus windrows along the north, east and south boundaries (the row along the south boundary is off - site). E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Ratio Required Provided Church 1 per each 4 200 seats 50 68 fixed seats provided Preschool 1 for each Approximtely 35 68 staff member 100 children, Plus 15 staff 1 per each 5 children II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The applicants are proposing to develop the front MU TF8t of the S acre parcel. The present development includes a church sanctuary with additional classrooms and offices in a detached structure. Besides normal church activities, they also plan on operating a daily preschool facility. Initially, the preschool will be established for approximately 30 children. If the program 1s successful, they could receive State approval for approximately 100 children. Ample parting 1s provided for such activities. All other aspects of the preschool facility Must meet State standards and regulations. The applicants have provided . list of all proposed activities (see Exhibit `F'). The site is within the boundaries of the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. As such, special landscape and setback standards have been applied to this project. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Emerick, 1015;0y, o emn reviewed this project on November 5, 1987. The Committee found the project to be consistent with the goals of the Etlwanda Specific Plan and recommended approval subject to the following conditions which have been included in the attached Resolution: 188 . t PLANING COMISSI STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -05 - CROSS a CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page 3 1. The Committee recommended that Vista Street be improved with a modified cul -de -sac. However, the Committee recognized that the issue Say need discussion by the full Commission based upon any public input received at the hearing. The applicant's would also like to construct a block wall across the end of vista Street to prevent on -site vandalism and duping. 2. The rArimeter block wall should be constructed at the north and south property lines to the point where Phase I development ends. Any future development of this site would require expansion of the periveter block wall, 3. All windows of each building should be multi- paned. 4. The wood shingle roofing should be treated with a fire retardant substance. 5. The applicant should submit for Planning Division approval samples of roof material, siding and rock. Also, the applicant should prepare a test panel o4 the rock veneer for review by the Planning Division to verify quality of rock material and workmanship. C. Technical Roview Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and oetermined.. cn&v i w - the recommended conditions of approval, the project is cors•stent with all applicable standards an4 ordinances. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp e e by e ampp can . Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is censistent with the Etlwanda pee c an an a General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, building design, together with recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 'a 1$4 t PLANNING C- OWISSIa STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -05 - CROSS A CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH ' November 25, 1927 Page 4 Iv. CORRLSPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a e art newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a ji prope 'owners within 300 feet of the project'site. '. Y. RECCIMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ..- appr ve o dTiTonal Use Permit 87 -US, subject to all conditions of approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. c - ;�" /Res fully'ub it 3 le Planner BB:DH:te Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Site Utilization Map Exhibit 'B' - Site Plan Exhibit 'C' - Landscape Plan Exhibit 'D' - Building Elevations Exhibit 'E' - Building Elevations ` Exhibit 'F' - ,Statemerit of Activities Resolution of Approval with Conditions 190 L ...r... w.. I L , L 1 1 r . R7 'A ii CITY OF emu, 87 -,oS RANUD CUCAMONGA mju, Uhli l ri ANNQ,K3 DRISKV EXHIFYTr, scAm t 1 +• r—tl r_i ri I i l •�- yr✓ • Y i r5 r J-7 s:x.:ss CITY OF rrEnrl �ecLA F37 - -05 RAIVCI i0 CLY'AiICjNa- �A TM.E, _5tie�i! I'LANNM Dlt'ISI^^ ExHurr _B__— scnLE, 1 rr =�. A �7• I I f�- - .�Y� +-, Y I i+li+ +• --•+r I rn +• r—tl r_i ri I i l •�- yr✓ • Y i r5 r J-7 s:x.:ss CITY OF rrEnrl �ecLA F37 - -05 RAIVCI i0 CLY'AiICjNa- �A TM.E, _5tie�i! I'LANNM Dlt'ISI^^ ExHurr _B__— scnLE, 1 Pr ps rteIt "'�*►' l .r. ( �0e ""' � �f � ••f�i�v.w.t ten+ � yrry.•wanF h•w�t+4+ V NOKTH CITY OF fiE \I' 4•�i� 0JrV R.'.\CHO CUCAMO\GA TnU, AW-- PI A%;N "I(i DINT)KI\ EXHINT'_ ✓r SCALE 193 iy Pr ps rteIt "'�*►' l .r. ( �0e ""' � �f � ••f�i�v.w.t ten+ � yrry.•wanF h•w�t+4+ V NOKTH CITY OF fiE \I' 4•�i� 0JrV R.'.\CHO CUCAMO\GA TnU, AW-- PI A%;N "I(i DINT)KI\ EXHINT'_ ✓r SCALE 193 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMA PLANNING DIVU)N M'AtTH MEM, 45MF B7-42 rIrLE 6U %�4�nq' Ol el��l f %CY! E%HIM*- -P SCALE, I `14 ' -1 I !4: ■. V 1 CITY OF rm\ll eV.497 s!-O! RANCHO CUCANIONUA TM E, 0, w� /IV PLANNM CNVL'F^\ Fx-mrr, - -- SCALE--- �. 19C l 2 Cross ant. Crown a, rrM � 5 activities 11 1 Lutheran_ Church stntmmt rsoei d by city on 5/7187. t - of Rancho Cucamonga Richard A Nelson, Pastor + �i 7° REOwnn PROJECT: CUP 87-05 "Proposed Iatheran Church: sanctuary, mati-purpose apace, Office and Education buildings, and parking lots at 6723 Etivaoda Avenue." - ; SIATOM OF ACTIVITIES x I. The proposed activities and uses for this facility include the following hens: 1. Worship Services 2. Sunday School 3. Nursery Care 4. Education, to include daily pre - school g extended care 5. Bible Study Classes 6. Fallowshly events 7. Management seetings 8. Choir rehearsals 9. Junior Sigh g Senior High Youth groups 10. Church etaff/Oaily business 11. Community events, meetings. A services II. Proposed hours of operation are as follows: Sunday: 8:00as to 9:00pa Monday: 7:30es to 9:00pa Tuesday: 7s30nm to 9:00ps Wednesday: 7:30® to 9:00pa Thursday: 7:30aa to 9:00pa Friday: 7:30as to 9:00pm Saturday: 9:OOsa to Noon III. Number of members: Existing ... 165 baptized (55 family unite) 5 year projection... 400 baptized (130 family unite) IV. There is no proposed fubae use of the remaining grove other than as appears an the plans submitted. Any future development, planned and unplanned, will be consistent with current zoning. Sincerely, CROSS and CROWN U711O'U CHURCH , of Rancho Cucamonga �xhibi t f (W 1 q4 Rev. Richard A. Nelms, RESOLUTION NO. 87 -209 A. Recitals. (t) Cross and Crown Lutheran Church has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -OS as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as •the application% (11) On the 25th of November, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing an the application and concluded said hearing on that dote. (111) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8 Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above. referenced public hearing on Hoveebor 25, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 6723 Ettwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 331.18 feet and lot depth of 662.70 feet and is presently improved with rock curb which must be restored per the Ettwanda Specific Plan; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a garden /greenhouse facility, the property to the south of that site consists of rural single family residences, the property to the east is existing single family residential, and the property to the west is vacant parcels. 19? PLANNING COINISS. RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87 -05 - CROSS A CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refarenced public hearing and upon the specific findingc of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and General Plan the objectives of the Development Code, area the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use together with the conditions applicable t�eroto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applivable Specific Plan Development Code 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project his been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division (1) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed at the north and south property lines to the point when Phase I development ends. Any future development of the site will require extension of the perimeter block wall. (2) All windows of each building shall be multi- paned. (3) The roofing material must be tile. A sample of the material shall be submitted for Planning Division approval prior to issuance of building permits. (4) The applicant shall submit for Planning Division approval samples of siding and rock prior to issuance of building permits. Also, the applicant shall prepare a test panel of the rock veneer for review by the Planning Dlvlsi000 during const- "on to verify quality of rock material and wor1um (o 197 r PLANNING COMIISS: RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87 -05 - CRCSS i CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page 3 Enoineerino Division (1) The existing curb and Titter on Etiwanda Avenue shall be removed and replaced per City Standard for Cobble Curb and Gutter (No, 307)• (2) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Ettwanda Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off site north of thA project's north boundary to tlx: first pole off site south of tho project's south boundary, , prior to public Improvemant acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Ile developer way request a reimbursement agreement to recover from future development (redevelopeent) as it -,ccurs on the opposite side of the street. '3) Vista Street abutting the cast proparty line of the project site shall be completed with a temporary cul -de -sac, 16 foot radius Kithin the exletiAg street width, designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCHIEL, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 199 a��sD�spr_e [ ;': E rill Titia�5d8=�d ? 3 if ��YSs : 5 C N% ac ll f;� 1��t9 & - ' fly➢ I s�D lei lull � " `i3a = ya si1=L _dj ; s R.i 11 tljl11a.1%81 Will Ix{ SIX 113 =a---Y31 fC�;SQ �Z li'C�D li �_� y l ==i� pp ;6f F �i s °° Eci3 j di�1a i d "a li sii s1E�� -D. a • +� en's Eli =rats a _ + rl I� s2F saa 3Y -sus g - a 1, a 3 = � ,za% y in d hii111 i I its I UP so M S Y s s s s a ,Ii e. a v § � aoo '4 y� -Sal 1 ;`s ei V "n's l;sr3s s10 1 t$ s Al V s ii-- °I ! �t3 i its= dI all a�3 'y 31ao aaa 2111 iaa� tir � i of it l iaD 2 = a ; raf Aii_ Y 5 i s as t pal za 11 - I i aFBs aS I 3 =nje 1` F e*ai =yp p s z t as VE21 la . l gilts Sin rj it JD1 riE SasY _� n� s° ; 3. �a -� �Y� 3lea�a_� i"'3FiSt ss '' a 15 E. ra j�a�Y � 5a Qs �}; 15 a. y! ; as 1a=. a.`i. cl�rj.! J= 5 * -3a; °y ii�i� r as "�3it I �il5Esi853 it �ia?�[ d_�i H z ai I � N ss_ a ]' ;tls USA!, a ;nY• Yia4y 1 :a3 its 3 U-361 �� f? ! !a3?c r ! as 7 s�.� _ °S iaaz 3'r =t MIT !�..aY 1 3a� ^5ss 6 3! s °.s -s i �sa aY�?? a �'sa '3'' sF is a 18 -Ti -s 3' a. _° j ° ssa !ii ='`i s� X8.13 t no 1 �� 1.fa ap 3521 Sij :F'j 3:- €A 3 =ads ! alsa slr 1raSi elY fiycirs i�s'a�i k is ' a Y a' ? j a: -°. x pb1 �` _ lsr ~z ' ai; �s ps al s- f� s� �s .3�i ai8 �:.a =.iUi All 2c :ssrir��l6_' AMR Al ai9} a d \' aoI � I I \ )d � ) 'ƒy /f � •�)� f | |!� j f� All if ! ! _ \ �;r. R - �| ° r ]a l �g � | j |�■ 2a ! # . ! f \ |.- t < /N| P� � ©:` fill ! | CIA 1114 4 |i ;- �)� | r |t /4| �!§ d T:. � \ j Or �� | g a lh| t � �� . : ■� �qA TL 3.1 q p | , j P�sf 9 !h 24 ft Pis \ N � a @ ®r j 2\ j 9 ass sp ipasi #I r i ai 3 Yiai ar iJ i9 aa1F €- 8� Sigt N 11 FgtB a- g Sig ati s Fd'j s ° t 31lil3 is I' s !c l VI I- a yi = e�a:;i ilia "e = _� jj=11 y i 3a °j:�I_; € a� !� se 1 � e'�5i s 1 %jj3 s ~ G =p 3 �95 a3�S3� al €it aRIZ aHa1 a !jio RUA I ids A c 5 � _ aj i 1� " ^l slas 3% ea is All a ajfi 3I� Is 3,2 521= 3'� ;ss 1. = S die 1 -3 a !1•� sal IN AGE- tai T: s ;je3 -3 I< 5'3r �ip a! i� 33l��tsf : a� a: a ti s =Ye ! a � F .4 -a li in i; i1i1 a. — FLaa `= _ a |is] �� / 2`. ` �P | a /!3 1 # fi ....It1 3 | -f . . :!!! |_ :! IRE �w |� �2 �- ! |!! ®` ! � • i 811 !A I is % ! A , e� q . . :� .e q | | 152 h ! |1 XP� St i ` | 9 i | z ! f- \. | , .nu /�| !|1 �' �� » `• ' !� f| # | �s b1. � ! �% 11%1 �� |� t� • ! » , , . • , 4 a. ■� §! d q g : ; |E | @ . ! #;a. � ■ | t l |�! |» « � � \f #L k,!;!a: \s �/ E is � L1 a f ■ | �' R :3 l»- %a z ;- q 2 l & g ; a | q q § !I ! \ | /,g < t : . , i . . �I 3g, i! ?a y i s za r' � !- 73a zaib7 i as y�z �173 3 � �� a� '15 �3! Tp ifp s1 is a{ '° 5�� II r _' l3f i wj ` 1i As AN R, j 9 3 3 W 7s- at °� 92 � L• y 7 - Y q _ J. j js i is i -F; `sa_a 9 ��r P si' .1 u \ /@ a � ■ d ' # :| q � # �| q G� � s| �f �| © �t ,� £■ j \ $ gill ®. 14 a. . | .| ■ as f k ƒ 4 | § �� •r.7 � ! - � -» ~7 ||9 || �£ % # �2 r' 4 �� 3 ! q • f77� / |!1§��d! g § � #£ &_ :3�He $b |A -�6 d \ ■2 A; , \ j j j a &6 I ■ DRAFT FOR :NSCUSSiON PURPOSES ONLY N. ENVIRONMENTAL A3-IL "MR6 .uw w..,.........� _ - - -- roposa u a , square o0 sent uary u: ng and a 2, OU square foot office and classroom building. and operate an extended day nursery and proshcool on 5 ae.res of land in the Very Low Resiiential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiw.nda Specific Plan, located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APH: 227 -Ob. 03. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Coemissioner Chitiea questioned why the wood shingle roofing is allowed. wo Debra Meier, shingle roofingAssociate is ispecifically referred to ini theeEttwanda iSpecific Plan Nith Lhgt in mind, Design Review agreed to the wood shingle roofing in this project. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, clarified that wood shingle roofing is one of the materials encouraged by the Etiwanda Specific Plan in keeping with the rustic, rural characteristics of Etiwanda. Cnairman McNiel opened the public hearing. William Runyan, designer, stated the applicant concurs with most of the conditions of the staff report. The applicant did question the possibility of the cul -de -sac and after polling the neighbors of this project, they would not be supportive of cul- de- sating off the street at this time. The applicant proposes to construct a masonry block w4ll on the property line from corner to corner on the east corner. Planning Commission Meeting - 10 - November 25, 1987 P09 Commissi er Chitiea moved to refer this project to the Design Review Commissioner Ererfck seconded the motion. Notion carried by Ccamittee, the followi x AYES: CITIEA, ENERICK, 6LAKECLEY, NCNIEL Xate NOES: CE ABSENT: CLSTOY Commissione continue Item N to the January 13 1988 carried by meeting, commissioner Chitiea econded the lotion. Notion the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, C IEA, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY \ a -- carried N. ENVIRONMENTAL A3-IL "MR6 .uw w..,.........� _ - - -- roposa u a , square o0 sent uary u: ng and a 2, OU square foot office and classroom building. and operate an extended day nursery and proshcool on 5 ae.res of land in the Very Low Resiiential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiw.nda Specific Plan, located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APH: 227 -Ob. 03. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Coemissioner Chitiea questioned why the wood shingle roofing is allowed. wo Debra Meier, shingle roofingAssociate is ispecifically referred to ini theeEttwanda iSpecific Plan Nith Lhgt in mind, Design Review agreed to the wood shingle roofing in this project. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, clarified that wood shingle roofing is one of the materials encouraged by the Etiwanda Specific Plan in keeping with the rustic, rural characteristics of Etiwanda. Cnairman McNiel opened the public hearing. William Runyan, designer, stated the applicant concurs with most of the conditions of the staff report. The applicant did question the possibility of the cul -de -sac and after polling the neighbors of this project, they would not be supportive of cul- de- sating off the street at this time. The applicant proposes to construct a masonry block w4ll on the property line from corner to corner on the east corner. Planning Commission Meeting - 10 - November 25, 1987 P09 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Reverend Richard Nelson, Pastor of the Cross 8 Crown Lutheran Church, stated his concern about vista Street and the cul -de -sac. They would not like to incur the expense. Mr. David Long, 13201 vista Street, Etiwanda, stated he does not like the cul -de -sac. He would like to do what was done on the other two streets tnJ the block srntahe would get a petition the support of neighbors he cul- de -sac and supporting the block wall. Russell encroachments onto annyone�seproprtys asnd does not expand the right-of- way. . The 18 foot radius is fit into the roadway. Mr. applicant g developing property r but intend to maintain the back portion 1/3 s agrove Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea stated a standard block wall has a very unfinished appearance and is not as aesthetically pleasing. Ms. Chitiea stated that even a modified cul -de -sac makes the better turnarounds. commissioner Cni exnr�ssed concern about ld notdsupport f and unless it Was fullyffresprink ed she would thewood shingle but rather prefer tile. Commissioner Blakesley stated his concern about the windrow bounding on both like to Sides see Of properties ire eretardant p opartleshusede roofing. and not expose the windrow to this possibility. Commissioner Blakesley concurs with Commissioner Chitiea regarding the modified cul -de -sac. Commissioner Emerick questioned the designer's justification with the wood shingle roof and the public safety issue of using fire retardant wood shake as opposed to tile. Chairman McMiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Runyan, designer, stated that fire retardant authentic wood shingles are available and does not see from a building and safety view that as long as they are UL rated, there shouldn't be a problem. The fire areafis�venonisite fire hydrants.iltFurthermore, thew Etiwanda shingles pecific Plan does specifically address the use of wood shingles as a roofing material. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that a treated wood shingle would never meet the same standards as a concrete tile or clay tile, but it does, as the architect stated, meet the minimum Building Safety standards for fire protection. This would be precedent setting on any future site. Planning Commission Meeting - 11 - November 25, 1987 RO 7 • DRAFT i, FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Runyan stated the building has been designed to meet the goal of Etiwanda Avenue. ! aestheticseof therarea And tsInca woodoshake isrspecifiedlin upgrade plan, the t would support the project. Oomissioner Emerick concurs with tte prior comsents on the cul -de -sac. Chairman McNiel stated he supports the modified cul -de -sac. Chairman McNiel feels e shake single, Is Inc nsistentwiththecrrntt the roof policy sofn i the Commission. it Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Pastor Nelson questioned whether the modified cul -de -sac eliminated the block wall. Chairman McNiel stated that the curb Is rounded off, there may be landscaping and partially walked. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, modified the wording in Condition 3, pago N -13, under EnginearinT to read • .project site to be completed with a minimal cu - e -sac 8 foot radius within ttie existing street width, designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.' Coatmissioner Chitiea moved to approve the resolution as modified with the wood shingle changed to concrete tile and the modified cul -de -sac. Chairman McHiel seconded the motion. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY * , . • • -- carried 0. E oNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13742 - AC AND C reSidentlat su v son and des1`§—n rev ew of a o r,-, 3ivisicn on 4.49 acres of land within the Low Density Residential ntrtct dwelling units per acre), located on the south side oP w Route +/- 550 feet west of Sierra Madre - APN: 207 - 342 -12. Assoc ted with the project is a Tree Removal Permit. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, sented the staff report. Comissioner Blakesley questioned if ut111ties are in the backyard of the existing property and the ones to built. Debra Meier stated yes. Planning Commission Meeting - 12 - \ November 25, 1987 }I •A j 9 L Y C Y � U U � U W � C M l q J W Y F N O 4 of q " c 21b Y.e W L i Y 6 ~ H n N � 0 Q 1 J � U W N Z o U A U. q O V U'` el J S. i r`✓ 1� S Y� e0 Y GO �n — _ _ _ _ _ V q A � yD jxr+ 13, C i, 4 �s 9 'j�; ei wJ 6 q — — — q q P~ S QQm y N TT O + U L L � b OI U Y Nv j 9 L Y C Y � U U � U W � C M l q J W Y F N O 4 of q " c 21b Y.e W L i Y 6 ~ H n N � 0 Q 1 J � U W N Z o U A U. q O V U'` el i~ z is e+ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 t TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL. AS3ESWWT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN amen en to pFovi a procedures or requesting mo cation of rail service development standards and to authorize 'medium wholesale storage and distribution' as a permitted use in Subarea 13 bounded by the I -15 Freeway on the east, Buffalo Avenue on the west, approximately 280' south of 8th Street on the north end approximately 1,335' north of 4th Street on the south. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City ounc approval of a Negative Declaration and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 87 -02, II. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: In September of 1986 the City Council adopted ex ens ve amen nts to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) as recrnmended by the Planning Commission. As developers and staff have worked over a year with the new plan additional fine tuning has been suggested. On November 25, 1987 the Planning Commission considered staff recommended modifications. The recommended modifications would accomplish the following: a Authorize 'medium wholesale storagb and distribution' as a permitted use in Subarea 13. Subarea 13 is a General Industrial District and this use classification is permitted in all other General Industrial Districts in the ISP area. b. Provide a procedure by which property owners and developers can request modification to the rail service standards. Currently the Code does not contain such a procedure and the Planning Commission and staf7 believes it is appropriate to provide an avenue for developers to request relief from these standards under certain hardship situations. Detailed analysis of each issue is contained in the attached Planning Commission report of November 25, 1987. au Y nrq� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 87 -02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga January 6, 1987 Page 2 I11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES94ENT: The Planning Commission concludes that e pro pose aaKn n s would not create significant adverse envtroraental impacts and recommends recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration. i IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This itau has been advertised as a public hearing In s a y e2ort. newspaper. Re a "Y i itt , City Pu no2r BO: AN:vc Attachoents: Planning Commission Resolution C7 -205 Planning Commission Report, November 25, 1987 Planning Commission Mleates, November 25, 1987 Draft Ordinance of Approval 6- F. t RESOLUTION M. 87 -205 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOWENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -02 ADDING SECTION G.6 TO PART III AND INCLUDING "KEDIUM WAREHOUSING STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION' AS A PERMITTED USE IN PART V, SUBAREA 13 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of November, 1987 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds it necessary to clarify and revise the Industrial Area Specific Plan regulations pertaining to rail service standards and " mediva warehousing storage and distribution uses. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamongr Planning Commission has made the followingTindings. 1. That the amendment is warranted to permit an appeal process to the rail serve Development Standards and authorize "medium warehouse storage and distribution" uses in Subarea 13 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and 2. That the proposed ISP amendment would not have significant impact on the environment; and 3. That the proposed ISP amendment is in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse impact on the enviroment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on November 25, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved: 1. The pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Goverment Code, that to Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of November, 1987 Industrial Area Specific Man Amendment 87 -02 amending Part III, Section G.6 and Part IV, Subarea 13 as follows: A. Part III, Section G.6 shall be added to read as follows: "The above referenced rail service development standards may be .mended or deleted on a site -by -site basis during the Development /Design Review Process. The following must be determined by the Planning Commission. in order to authorize any modification of the rail service standard; 1. .�1i a a . i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. ISPA 87 -02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga November 25, 1987 Page 2 1 (a) That installation of a lead or spur track cannot be accomplished We to physical constraints on or adjacent to the project site; and (b) Other existing or potential rail service properties will not be negatively affected in their' ability to rccorwodate rail service activity as a result of modifications to the standards.' B. Part IV, Subarea 13 shall be emended to 1nclude''medium kholesale, storage and distribution• under permitted uses. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Development District Amenimnt 87 -02. 3. That a certiflad copy of this Resolution and relatediaterial hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannin Commission held on the 25th day of November, 15`x7, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CH M EA, SLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY X14 yx CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 25, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND IWDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN amendment o pmvidv procedures Tor reques ng mo ication of rail service development standards and to authorize 'medium wholesale storage and distribution• as a permitted use in Subarea 13 bounded by the I -15 Freeway on the east, Buffalo Avenue on the west, approximately 280' south of 8th Street on the north end approximately 1,335' north o 4th Street on the south. —f, - - I. ABSTRACT: The P13nning Commission will hold a public hearing to consf'der the environmental assessment and approval of revisions to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP). This report summarizes the revisions which are proposed and recommends their approval II. BACKGROUND AND DISC US SIJN: In September of 1986 the City Council a op a extensive ame n nts to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) as recommended by the Planning Commission. As developerc and staff have worked over a year with the new plan additional fine tuning has been suggested. This report identifies and provides recommended modification to two items of concern. Firstly, it has been noted that the 'medium wholesale storage and distribution' uses are authorized as permitted uses to all General Industrial Districts except one, Subarea 13. This subarea is located between the I -15 Freeway and Buffalo /6th Street and just north and south of 7th Street. Recent staff review of the subarea did not provide reasons for the deletion of this use in Subarea 13 and we therefore recommend its addition as a permitted use. It should also be noted that this matter first came to our attention through an inquiry by a developer. The second issue relates to the rail service standards. The current standards mandate rail service development of all properties adjacent to planned or existing lead and spur lines. This requirement was adopted to ensure that those properties which have the greatest rail service potential are not lost to that use by development which does not make accommodations for the rail service potential. ITEM p a)s k 7. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 87 -02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga November 25, 1987 Page 2 Staff strongly supports this policy but as a result of developer concerns it was noted that there is no avenue to request relief from the standards. Thdrefore staff has drafted a procedure by which property cwners and developers can request modification to the standards. The new provisions would require review by the Planning Commission and mandatory findings for approval which are designed to allow for deviation from the standards in hardship situations only. The following new section would be added to the ISP, Part III as Section G.6: 'The abov- referenced rail service development standards may be amended or deleted on a site -by -site basis during the Developmert/Design Review process. The following must be determined by the Planning Camaission In order to authorize any modification of the rail service standards: a. That installation of a lead or spur track cannot be- accomplished due to physical constraints on or adjacent to the project site; and b. Other existing or potential rail service properties will not be negatively affected in tWr ability to accommodate rail service activity as a result of modifications to the standards.$ III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has compl.tted Parts I and II of e Lnvironmental che—cMst and concluded ttie proposed amendments would not create significant adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a y eport newspaper. V RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission e op e e a tached Resolution recommending approval of the proposed amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. R ctfu ed, 1 City tanner 0B:AN:vc Attachments: Draft Resolution of Approval I to N .L i oc DRAFT MRPOSES ONLY, Mr. Stephen Ford, representing the William Lyon Company, referenced Section all aoolicttions "after' December�1d11987 instead Peral of applicable to Mr. Carawn Angelo 12774 Basil Street, questioned the Conditional Use for Vicuna as he was concerned that this was for all the areas of Rancho Cucamonga and \plic Victoria. Brad Buller, City Ptated there was a question whether Terra I to also needed ended. Terra Ytsta already requires a Conditional Use Permschools. Mr. Angelo questione lic building 1s defined. Chaiman McNiel closbli heari ng. Brad Buller, City Plarifi a that we are not defining a public bulldin but a comacilit and it does include a daycare y facility. y " Commissioner Chlttea roved to Blakesley seconded the motion. No r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONFRS: TOLSTOY Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND and to authorize 'medlum wnolesaie sro permitted use in S.barea 13 bounded east, Buffalo Avenue on the west, appr Street on the north end approximately 1 the south. resolution, Commissioner by the following vote: MERICK, MCNIEL -- carried lstribution' as a l5 Freeway on the 280' south of 8th I of 4th Street on Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea moved the approv0 of the resolution, Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Meeting - 14 - ��7 November 2S, 1987 ,.:,. H DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY r r r r r r - tarried R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -10 - - reaues aee ava nnOn ac P for and S. - APN: west of Baker Avenue - N: Chris Nestman, Associate Plann , Chairman McNiel opened the public Chairman Natal closed the public Commissioner Chitiea moved tc ap Commissioner glakesley seconded following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIiIEA, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY r r r r r r T. units per : units per Subarea 1, *ova Avenue n "4uaac w amenu z inuuszrlal Pee 1 to 1ncluda 4.31 acres of land rove Avenue, north of 8th Street and 207- 541 -60 and 207 - 251 -12. presented the staff report. M h ring. prove Item R and Item S as submitted, the m Lion. Motion carried by the OLAKES! E El1ERICK, NCNIEI carried On on 20.2 acres of land in the Very Low. Residential Oistria than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the nor st cc Hillside Road and Sapphire Street - APN: 1061 -121- 1,02,2 Associated with this development is Tree Removal rmit requesting the removal of 5 mature trees. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. M modified Condition 5 on pale T -30 to read "....shall be required Community Equestrian Trail . Chairman McNiel questioned if the cul -de -sac was compatible with Lane and an improvement over what is now existing. -A 'lots (less mr of d 03. 87 -81 Planning Commission Meeting 21- is - November 25, 1987 ORDIOXE NO. -M AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COCNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -02 ADDING SECTION G.6 TO PART III AND INCLUDING 'MEDIUM WAREHOUSING STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION' AS A PERMITTED USE IN PART V. SUBAREA 13 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (ASP) WHEREAS, on the 25th day of November, 1987 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recommended to the City Council adoption of modification to the City's industrial development standards to clarify and revise the Industrial Area Specific Plan regulations pertaining to rail service standards and 'medium warehousing storage and distribution' uses. WHEREAS, an the 6th day of January, 1988, the City Council held a duly advertised publir. hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. findings: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has made the following 1. That the amendment is warranted to provide consistency In the General Industrial Districts by eermitting 'Medium Warehousing Storage and Distribution uses in Subarea 13 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and 2. That the Amendment will provide procedures to request modification of rail service requirements of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and 3. That the proposed ISP amendment would not have significant impact on the environment; and 4. That the proposed ISP amendment is in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found that this protect wTr not create a significant adverse impact an the environment and aporoves issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 6, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved: 1. The pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 6th day of January, 1988 Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 87- 02 amending Part III, Section G.6 and Part IV, Subarea 13 as follows: a19 - b, t env ;,• j.r ' r >age 2 ,- rr A. Dart III, swtion 6.6 shall be added to read as 3 follows: ^lie above refbeenamended or de eted Revle PreCess to standards the pevelopak the planning basis during dust beIdeterldned by - modification of fie following to authorize any C'aaission in order the rail sery ice standard: track cannot d or (al That instaished due to Physicalsconstraints on or be accoap site; and agjatent to the project (b) ether existing or potential atively affect, d in prop, will not be ^date rail service their ability result Ofe activity as a result of modifications to thb standards." subarea 13 shall be a' dad to er include permitted 8, d;clesales storage and distribution under uses. /1-Ir ��O i 1' i F CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1987 TO: Mayor and Meabe's of the City Council rROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Asso-iate Planner SUBJECT: WIROWEATAL ASSESSMENT AND TERPA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMEN mrl B7 -U - NEST , regues iO�fy life- ann usea gna ons Ti i-Offffce Park (OP), Commnity Commercial =, and Commercial (C) to Community Commercial (CC) and Office Park (OP) involving a 71 acre parcel within the Terra Vista Planned Coammunity located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APR 1077- 421 -05, 06, and 13. 1. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission ono staff recommend that 'W: i—C"ty Council approve Terra Vista Planned Community MenWent 87 -04. II. BACKGROUtID: The purpose of the revision to isle land use esaT—atTons for this parcel is to accommodate development of the Terra Vista Town Center project which was appproved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 1987. The site, bounded by Town Center Drive, Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue, is currently designated by three areas - Community Commercial (CC), Commercial (C) and Office Park (OP). The current proposal for the Town Center project differs slightly for the original conceptions in the Terra Vista Colammity Plan. The designation of Commercial (C) will be deleted from this parcel and the office Park (OP) des'gnation is being relocated from the central portion of the site to the northern portion of the Ate. The amendment is completely le t aile in the Planning Commission staff report and attached Brad D Ter City Tanner' B86N: to Attachments: Planning Comission Staff Report of December 9, 1987 City Council Ordinance Amonding the Terra Vista Cownunity Plan .Q41 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 9, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meter, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY PJMRLamllt 01 -U1 - Wt51tM rRUrtRT1tS - A r!gmIeft to =011y e land use es gna ons ram ce Park (OP), Community Commercial (CC) and Caawerctal (C) to Community Commercial (CC) and Office Park (OP) involving a 71 acre parcel within the Terra Vista Planned Comemlty located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue - AM 1077- 421 -05, 06, and 13. I. ABSTRACT: The developer is- requastfn�g for recomaadatfon of approval —for Issuance of the Negative Declaration and approval of the Comunity Plan Amendment to change the zoning designations for a parcel located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The purpose of the revision to the land use - sig�aiTons for this parcel is to accommodate development of the Terra vista Town Center project. The site, bounded by Town Center Drive, Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue is currently designated Community Commercial (CC1 for the western portion of the site, Office Part (OP) through the aid portion of the site and Commercial (C) for the easterly portion of tho site. The proposed reconfiguring of the land use designations would designate the proposed design center office cosplelt•near Haven and Town Center as Office Park (OP, while the entire remaining portion of the site would be designated Community Commercial (CC). The amendment is completely detailed in the attdched exhibits. The original concept for Town Center used a much smaller, portion of the site for the Community Comercial activities. The original concept envisioned fewer department store tenants than the four major tenants proposed at this time. The conceptual community comercial and home center plan designated approximately half the site as Community Commercial concentrated at the Haven Avenue - Foothill Boulevard intersection. A specific area to serve as a home center was designated on a small portion of the site near Foothill and Spruce. The commercial center and home center were divided by an office park and entertainment center. ;t23L ITEM R PLANNING COMMISSIO1 :AFF REPORT TVPCA 87 -01 - WESTERN PROPERTIES December 9, 1987 Page 2 The proposed plan as submitted as combined the commercial center/home center to a single larger commercial activity mall while positioning the office park and entertainment area at the north end of the site nearer Town Center Drive. 8. Compat1b111ty with P. otning Land Use: As the intent of the uses onPi" i no c ange3 out orgy been shifted, the overall issue of compatibility with adjoining land uses has not bee disturbed. The two parcels north of Town Center Drive between Haven Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, and between Terra Vista_ Parkway and Elm Street are Office Park zones and will be adjacent to the design center /office park portion of the Town Center project. The parcel north of -own Center Drive between Elm Street and Spruce Avenue 1s designated High Density Residential. The location of High Density adjacent to the Community Commercial zone will allow convenient access to residents for shopping and entertainment. Mitigation measures have been included in the Town Center plan to decrease any potential noise levels that would effect a residential project. C. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed Part I o e Initial u . Has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to consider approval of the moo ca on, a onning Commission must first find that this amendment is Consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan and the General Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a y sport newspaper, the property posted, and notices were senTio aTT property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve ffie request through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. ReWle ed, BrCi BB:ON:te Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - Revised Text and Land Use Plan Corresponding to Changes in Requested Land Use Designation X23 5;. M M > H m � <v IM n z >i n ^z cN z •" 10 jm 3 z S i JPCti' fiEM V _ }.TnU, Rev 1S6tl' Tcxt =t zk 5 = z QN g O > v C 0 A Z M M > H m � <v IM n z >i n ^z cN z •" 10 jm 3 z S i JPCti' fiEM V _ }.TnU, Rev 1S6tl' Tcxt =t zk t \ v y»r5 'Tmb\ _.. 225' ■ Pig �n } &� Q , s<| ! z 3 -20$ � . \■w ■ -.• $o 2 5C2l7J / ■(� I | {7 � ox CL �! 7 2« % JCL r 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Ge' eS > 0 0 0 0 0 57-4 4 y q 4 p 4 g_o 3 q o tyy i N t • Q 7r7 N (f 9 n 1"•�1 _ Z; y ICe l wg ` R ° na '� N R Q w Ir R elo 3 n n e g y r 3 a 'g o ey a op aq oy 0q 0q 0y oCa X3 3 3 to CIS n3 �E 3 � e • n�$ `VI EN y N �e ON R b a ag ;g � � ^ � •! O � em� nom 7 'C 7( }•o pO n pS C »C 1.i N �tA O 8 r� Mn (1 RQ 7 en duel S o n M 9 e N a C N e?� i e m �9 n � � a 77i a d y e n c 88 = n a RFd11 TVfY y b'% G9 n » n ° TIJU, EXHIHM 2 y., s' f, W O�:YWEi ^��.� Y•-l;u�is1^�IWi. ©t1�L1�Y 1 I- w � O f� M O�:YWEi ^��.� Y•-l;u�is1^�IWi. ©t1�L1�Y I- C O�:YWEi ^��.� Y•-l;u�is1^�IWi. ©t1�L1�Y I- n7EM, TpVPGh' 9%C3 _.. _ AW) c S n'¢1O•o+ raga ' ^, e ff e u ° u k n r` 03 �� n gg -1 a S SS o1� <P �,9�dyNY n n.�.. n r N N N n W. ;� N• N 7 ci ;;z yq 33 n n10 nn 67'Rgg '•u 7••C .�6P ,eS »far g N 6n P6� �g� A _rs 6.N U 6�•OwW 6 gin aalt8�in74�w�_g;an ago,n �ti no 7 nC jn a and Aaa °�Rno�13 89ma_n � DW;�issaR9X rg$4�,o•< >m7 �76 ad4� A• OigS, m �a nF 7 C o N^ T N O o 0 y M ,MOO n4 7 a —c u a7a<6o —bT r> W. oa�n <7n$ g7e8»s6 Nn r n 7 o r n C= e a QQ maim <4 o�Qq�go.o m+'yagG ,fwomu �M $ 2�r 13i .< Q8 na n 7 p n n ao''u .r• �o� i0n n ^7i' dnaf�.N i s n�n e�• -•y, n� �'-� P.�m^ ePi? iy�m1% �m> NT q�Ge�w" ^d2! 2 —�nF lcPavmnww_Tr "4 d m b =,aW gN =W 7 7'3NN.r<7w ;^ g Bann 7 n »n �Npnm -; FCm <O.3 w$m� =Gw ap ,m N 21'� ;Cw$ >n dw,'^O0 3n9_g ^6O C.'r�j Qj' Sfl _= yao on <? ro 3u'^�• cc0Sy =;; an A �'o O W =aaaon y�y°a »G�a <�i a�= yS <oaEn d <* n�rnCls (�N° or'. nn7 +mom j =0U*3 " = -d AO 7 9 n mE, _ -.__ ^z8, N1 71�17�^7 A p I CS -(- PG0.6 pa= m cri; 'J T �CCC¢�S7 n �17f ]SO { Sw ap+GR je '� 1• w Ip � � > 01 1 1 n C p? s.y r =s 3 "C +01 erl� e•ra • n p YNy1 . F NIP aPbWON1% �.ViV�j MI b X11 VN0600 401P0 N r V b b P r N + O P P O N O N + N W N N N W W N O W N N N P P �OmJW 1 O N W r W O . p rml / ✓ YI//T ,'-7-c3 rrIU, rerxc YiL>a 4OLe % Xcmrnai y EXHIBM SCALEI .;1 7 O ,DISC C MP w k Q C N O b cr a s w N O Q b P N N 0 0 O O m r N1 71�17�^7 A p I CS -(- PG0.6 pa= m cri; 'J T �CCC¢�S7 n �17f ]SO { Sw ap+GR je '� 1• w Ip � � > 01 1 1 n C p? s.y r =s 3 "C +01 erl� e•ra • n p YNy1 . F NIP aPbWON1% �.ViV�j MI b X11 VN0600 401P0 N r V b b P r N + O P P O N O N + N W N N N W W N O W N N N P P �OmJW 1 O N W r W O . p rml / ✓ YI//T ,'-7-c3 rrIU, rerxc YiL>a 4OLe % Xcmrnai y EXHIBM SCALEI .;1 7 ,R S =S n =Y, w ial�a' r0 p qC m O = M f =i U3 O 1 vm p w 3 d =a z w _ + n�n O 6 cr CY T N A { n 4y� R� C MP w k ,R S =S n =Y, w ial�a' r0 p qC m O = M f =i U3 O 1 vm p w 3 d =a z w _ + n�n O 6 cr CY T N A { n 4y� R� c vu 3 Saaaunn_u _4 C. aN x <l'1 � ��g *x3G Q L� e� O ii "A JIM o al IN 1I CIE Tt' nfill gcs s� c a��,d7 YSi 'Q�s��rSO ^.xl °'»a'_? N 0.a +Q• Y Jt<N a x x t 99 _ N• fw�aQ <_�..� LLry�� C Ol ��w�,� ��a�i •0.• � ��Y7r8•�a1 �9 �� _ M � `f a^ i �NiA ^� g de 1S 211 10 o 1, "C V 7`Z dwnA -fi<�w -,z A$T a g„ 3 <_ c S 7 Ynu iAn� =�� w7Nq m MMwYn a�GSG1c a� �� AO cgs—, M 1 M � Jt•O * � jp� a a A O�wN1C S <" 6�6AV , Q•w A �w a7�n �at� �gMIS, w 7 a a C 7 y a C a b a cr Ic '4C rrEm, :y TrrlE EXHIBrrs SCALES rr, o a o R? �`9 o n S�l�2n- is�^oSi e��C MAmys tAn 2O _fm7Q_�}]�{ggqqa_a C qNJ �f °-'. � p a��—^.g�`apz�3Rxi�0o�1n,oDiJ� C a� 3C- 9 ^� sdN C.1Q�p�7N�04 a_ '. M p��9Nw Y1 "G G'�Y1 QNaN,yJ= do Y N w "s & r S C � s sFo ;;0 , ^s c MFZ 0 7 a O N 6 n C N L O N N cn g' m ^ x1r� o N ^C IpX ^Nb 6 G� C 0 n v G ap] p N � n N CL MEM, TTi1El BXHIBrri SCAIEg g3 �a AMCg��o�m-� 2 z >s ?gym »n°s.-'�aca ^Sa° p ` ,gym d O ^ b. p j p O 1 CL O 6 ton " , N 9 a � C O , A N O � a x H = a ^ a a31 $..- "B 4 Ee o N � S S: • • � � C � � � • � r YYY ; Y Ile s le nTm, rvF'G.� 57-03 w« TM E, :� EXHlDR+ SCALE, ■ RESOLUTION NO. 87 -209 J 's A RESOLUTION Of THE RANCHO CUCMMNGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOiMElDI1N'i,.APPROVAL OF MAA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AAENCIME1T. TO'MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM COMMUNITY CpMERCIAL, OFFICE PARK AND COM"IAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE PARK FOR A PARCEL OF LAND MOUNDED BY HAVER AVENUE, TOM COW DRIVE. SPRUCE AVENUE AND FOOT 'LL BOULEVARD - APR 1077- 421 -05, 06, AND 13 rdEREAS, on the 9th day of December, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following n�T: 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban commity within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growtn management policies of the City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, immprovement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services rogmired by development with the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Ccmmission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on December 9, 1987. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Caxission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Planned Community 4mendment 87 -04 as described in Exhibit OP. ass PLANNING COMIISSI6 " "EI TYPCA 87-04"- NESTERII I Deesebtr 9, 1997 Page Y APMOYED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMIS51O1 OF THE CITY OF RAYCHO COCAMIGA AYES: NOES: ABSENT: of the City of on was duly and mission.of the _ Commission held" COMIISSIDNERS2 TOLSTOY, CHMEA, BLAKESLEY. EKERICK, MCNIEL COMISSIONERS: NONE CO NISSIONERS: NONE 6T `a n m �� •, Y ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCF. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R:NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA PLANNED .v COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 87 -04 TO MODIFY THE LAND USE r DESIGNATIONS FROM OFFICE PARK (OP), COMt°.RCIAL (C) AND COMITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO.OFFICE.PARK (OF) AND w cy COMMUNITY CMKRCIAL (CC)(IAVDLYING A 71 ACRE PARCEL NITHIN THE TERRA VISTAlPLANNED COMMUNIiY•LOCATED ON THE ?( co NORTH SIDE OF FOOTIOILL BOULEVARD BETNEEN HAVEN-AVENUE AND 2 SPRUCE AVENUE - APH 1077- 421 -5, 6 AND 13 '• The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain as follows; SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the ;• following: A. That the Planning Commlssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the tine and manner prescribed by•Taw, recommends the _ +� Commaunity Flan text awndnent'hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in S the tine and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this Community Plan text amendmant is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The Community Plan text of the Terra Vista Planned Community Ts bere6y amended to read as follows: �� •, Y ' / rn Wo I a, � End ( - k� � |\ > �ASIB LION !&!-Z 5 E 2 ƒE @; l nd }¢!,Ec 9=70 35 M � f\� $i ■ £|§�£I .� ./ � \� ILI [ ( C 0 a 0 0 0 0 c,c > 0, , c {\ f� TM , - 20 3 � §�k -U z \ / CA f 7 7. > Q | E - I �ƒ2 ƒ { } E | ƒ| , 22� k� ( !�E }E CT ®�2 f {r cr 7(§ }¢} c m J }+ (I k% E) . 06 � 7 ng 7( | §{ '0! 2 - wo 8 E §{ � §� !� \ ¥ tE 06 $ !§ ¢k k f � ƒ e � ) � | ; &a , r$ $ gtoo ®® lilt G• 089 - -- - -- - - - .. ; ,4 - og -s n F O$MB 07 iffn Z Rrnr0'w °a 2'J G'�Na9'ng �1 ,,_' N0J oCl 1 nn ,R NnA <M;r a a' N 1_O,wba N 1nt n O . 120 � �ww ^1^L°N00°'m 1l 10 n o�l� i. N ii' � N! -n 1� N a' -Z a W a n r� O O , Q 1 •� C, N» N N v � q�Sn��7 Win; �e•ac R, a�'^�; a�y f4 ' y 4 NN p�1!$$ J lG.�$j • 7 on , O. O X O F O 3 N3 N' n w n • v 00Ofl J�?u 5��1pan;lp N nn J� g J•"�F7 '320329 7 <oi£wE a gN��vpgp�Na °3 <Qg 36nne`a= aol10 FFS:"6a.- al -°,E3 oRi��3?7 4 Jo •i m = b 'o a s x' �N�Fgagg,�w n no6�N�d1 =N 9 C J ~ d d IJaq °� », °. m _ 0 n is :Z n tai 1�ME;- a c c n o an N `^ ; G ^- y�D 7��ap rNqq AND <ab6bj,9N n, n < Q a s O <, d0 qq.IcO A >9nn 12 �6n I5 FL 0aV a 110 N n —pn N a-1—a o p we'd i's 550-0 '6g48,7ornq -+ cr iS -s o ala ; n o S4o'0 <0 I NtN Jwt([f� (� 90-1 0 000M.3 5R$ ow -C ,. "91117^ ^-5177• - nu CO na '—MIM Ngq ° uo'J? �_n p J N p Q nR4° z 3 _ 64NbOmJdma �d!Jn -non =A J �7wl�C m 1F�ip n. jQ N= q 7 O. J p N N m C g a N on d a 3 a n. 0p�nNNx "n �m ONMR a'w $^O��ny.J �li1b CJw� , 0 A 7S7 -1 �679°104iA7,[ =�d sic 1 0 0 O.a07 .7 40 m O r z 0 N j: n+� I W I O O m a to ry- A ' S i�szozn ^ xt � xxR.z�S ei -G -- a m caaa�'s� my .a3 m CCU -• ;C Aa°aYx �' Y,- -�� > C Ji Z 0>71 SSSQQ]]] ' X " -Z ..M a° O n 'qq I j O � r b W I O O m a to ry- A ' S i�szozn ^ xt � xxR.z�S ei -G -- a m caaa�'s� my .a3 m CCU -• ;C Aa°aYx �' Y,- -�� > C Ji Z 0>71 SSSQQ]]] ' X " -Z ..M i �aG A A r Y+ J N P P P P b W P a ai uu Y>0 2 • NPPO nN p, G- N R Oo oar mm C JbbP �N �7 �N n > Y 'co rs C p( G rNr coz G�G�GGQ�G�GQ11111IIIIINVW � "•G �� 1 O •1 =W r +NW y�l N N N OJ W NOJW =a a' �NNPP �C MN/ +W mb i um� N rj o a. n N d � b r P N} LbV+ N b r 0 j pPIVNO i �aG A A r Y+ J N P P P P b W P a ai uu Y>0 2 • NPPO nN p, G- N R Oo oar mm C JbbP �N �7 �N n > Y 'co rs C p( G rNr coz G�G�GGQ�G�GQ11111IIIIINVW � "•G �� 1 O •1 =W r +NW y�l N N N OJ W NOJW =a a' �NNPP �C MN/ +W mb i um� N rj o a. -T -.. ia.4l �fl` .` �_.tli`�.� _ - _t:..' -- ;x' ✓ „.�Y' 4!!S -a,• � ri,= r- + ,nee --.: `iY •r:d' � .r: ._ FNy`� ,?::.":,.�..:. �,a Y.f.} •'.CY? u�4Y�lu • r •}`�qj .a 4...y i . ccri3 Sm -NY 't, A'om --f nTma N<C1 A' ' p °N , _ 7., �Q. .A N 0.< P c O., < 1 P At�`L fy' .ei .. � �- o <9'P+ N_,"�nej o;0' •n,,,'4 fJ N,�M •a 7C. �a..p ldnn —,RQ A to ,� m r 4+ ^�j,P, .4 n”` ° W ':�:_ •�,Ni, , •,. 7A p'.`.�'x s,j,r,.:;u N A �9 0 » CA 7 �_ ",7 m ^" n �.p O n "7yv'4s'.".•i sb�• -; p� IO NN 10 ? CL < � O.0 'c m p S�m 01 La T . ;a Iu4o3m o •0c ! n•C m�4u 7 o•= '74',','1 d+ A 180 O�c� �p..r... •ta N- 3r cif <9'q' , 'ti'`�3 3y 3 n =2 —K no +7•N•�ArnVn g�'A, ^Si'� •7p n "''yi 03 nits R, 7 , b,Wy c ?Np n1�..�,'.. a- =�e•. °S'�Qy1 t. w ?�aK:- - �:: A' a aYU ". -ac--t �3 °mii d�A<n��'ne uo,— �Yc+`an ya ¢�• � _ 6. _ ti Q c l •,_�•.. _ mr n - •C wa _ ° C l0 p w N "a 6 C N r a^ S J) y N�'Ccmpp N x]O Gf ^P9�° a ° R y 3 " S 1 0 — � $ w • A C � ' 7 P a c p s 1 O F '. -0 i7 7 CIO pm o^ , So' ZG0 03 (]y m ^(S�� I N�C•�'P -� .. p V�`C r�•a0 =, �` 7• e T �< e P.w , b g �N b b' <s' g m OwriNl�` .��. o °ns�• bnic.� Q n bap ° ? P m e7 7 r °x+..� q1q sip �C,�S„ S(1 w TS7 m m$'ID 1t 7i °`G Aa7° y1 >e m 7 0trI c r �3 �aN °g ^Pew s P cJ$ A wm A•^,"u a;A1 H n m 5 ° 7' •MINE, — m 3 N t0 n7Rd —a Pn 7?saa6N I .,, G wt5 -S �X T7 pAC m wsn two. b m. po N n�• =O 4 c. VMS y 6�ae9 a 0 I N W f�ai� 7' J f l.:ri s SI ! \ } f {ƒEkƒ("E� IEIp- ƒ7wo ` � ---- - ■ -j -- a :,- - -. ;�. E`�.a7`'a; 'KI)a -�f� ■`E, �,�,§ CIE ;.a2 ■- �•E,; ;, ;� ;�£. | »� »a -� k | -7■ I■�!� a -! Co. to £ a ■I\i f �a -E! ■E ; � CL 0 0 2 - ' k� °° E ! } 2 �E!( 502 0 m CL \ ° . \ƒ !� Ea \ i Ln CL � § k \ ( " M> C � } ƒ[� %)& §a-a 04 0, 513 !! !ƒK § ,|E , �_Aa !$ !I 2k E■ E! ] ¢ f \ . -4 \ to s ! £ \ 3 E UO § ! � E �M(%O �C< EF | �( ; } ��\ ) CL E a of ( . � } ( � � \� «2 rn ƒ \k � &!$ ! ■ ƒ - - `' ., �» !a§ ' 4 �■ 2 / �\ 06 g. - . cr ¢ § f |§ !/ ■�. ,; R a }/ 0 $ f f \$ E£� | - ! . � @ E . ._ _ . % k� s 4 l' Vr a rz CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell 11. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Blanc N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer $& SUBJECT: Public Hearing continued from December 16, 1987, Eminent Domain action to acquire public right -of -way for the Base Line Road Widening Project between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue at the property located at 9549 Roberds Court (APR 202 -161 -09) for the construction of street improvements across the Base Line Road frontage of said property RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing stiff to proceed with condemnation of right -of -way for the construction of street improvements on Base Line Road across the properties located at 9549 Roberds Court (APR 202- 161 -09) in the City of Rancho Cuamonga. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS This Eminent Domain action to acquire public right -of -way for the Base Line Road Widening Street Improvement Project.* The projects limits are from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue. The property owners of the parcel in question, APR 202 - 161 -D9 have been offered the exchange of right -of -way for improvements. As of this date, negotiations to acquire such right -of -way continue without execution of a right -of -way exchange or purchase agreement. Although negotiations continue, it is felt necessary at this time to enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such right -of -way for the proposed Base Line Road Widening Street Improvements. This is done to avoid further delays in constructing the Improvements currently on hold due to lack of right -of -way. Res ubmi�tted�p R . :pam Q4S RESOLUTION 90. 4 -1-49() A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE • "Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND - ::iSSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOUGA AND M4U(ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the design, construction and street widening project for Base Line Road. Based upon the study conducted, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible alignment for the proposed street widening will require the acquisition of a right -of -way across a portion of a residentially zoned parcel, more particularly described herein; (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owners of recara to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuations; (iii) Pursuant to California Government Coda Section 40404, a City may acquire private property by condcmenation when it is necessary for extending and widening streets, as well as for the construction of drains, sewers and acqueducts; (iv) On December 16, 1987, this Council held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to the torus of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution_ NON, THEREFORE, is is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recital•„ Part A, of L11s Reso - of n. SECTIOW 2: That portion of the property which is required for a right -of -way or s ore drain and street widening purposes is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached berate as Exhibit 'A' and incorporated herein by this reference. Q4(. �r A _ Resolution January 5, 1980 ?age 2 , SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this C S ouncil ur ng above - referenced public hearing, including written staff - reports, Me City Council specifically finds as follows: ` a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; M` a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; yr b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution is necessary for the proposed project; And, d. An effer of fair market value has been evade to the owners of x said real property pursuant to the terms of California Covenment Code Section 7267.2. M:. MMON 3: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the proper escribed in Section 2, above, by proceedingn in eminent domain. The City Attorney is oroered and directed to bring an action in the Sueprior Court of the State of California for the Country of San Bernardino, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners an9 claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning and acquiring a i4ght -of -way fo• street purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as shy be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the Clay to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of ayor R •xr f 1t i sit sand" of Let 6, Van 1. Cmtomp moved Ntzlabp, le the Clry at Lec" "X M"S. AS far Illtt Mcedse to 1t, 6. at Itba, hm M. St, Iwnw" CO" McaNt dosolMe M '2 fellm: Crwrelo at a Plot a ts, Orb Ilse of Ws, LIM tad 163 Mt tin of tM tatsot m of Let It - tarb 100.64 fit, trm or loft, a tea SMb if" of lauft Cwt u emtae to tm Clary of SM tor"'O" by hot two Itlma•T 11. W1, to Sat 4", tan Its, , Official tocar4: theme gift a1Mn an SmtO tin of "to tans Ca . lmm fft% mn or I"$ at la tilt If" of the Matti, b mats of .� Lab t on 6, tloct t of said teammate Ombted As miattal Waco Smb use" t" tut PM M u4 at It [airy I, gib I" it" of at" LIM ands Comet total Ilan an trb it" of use LIM tae 160.91 Mt. MM r lou at the mitt of Iplmlo. 14 eaarMt ar to emu b animate moo. tattoos. dH" annachas, nt'"t seen. [tint signal stmt paments. tat "crab, lifter". cartel MI pally Me all atMf, stational, tMrwlth. Sae .wile[, stilt CotfwO b •StwdmA Crnrvs,• far b! City of tame WcsaCt 1174 CMt1a alb tonlatea bra"" lap. 111 elan am mmtrcba .altos talmt b etla ate mralt y sea toletorl" Cltist. of the C~t1 Otel"Mit; 0epartent for tb elf, at teal, Cxaomm. all irca aattom still caret, tttealabll apse oucdnt of •Ona, to Cattermv an. If at AMwead Mb/o 0 da" tmmafm. an VC, Collator auto M sea seeriandeat of stab stall Intl aWl col tnc"M b M an W the met tmmf Nall be o ill open W irafertl. ♦OO(D mw — mar u.®a 16 T3- -- -e —: eta tas— --- �-t+�- E%N161i IAe . i t, w mr,.a. nn n STAFF REPORT DATC: January 6. 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, Ctty,Engineer BY: Slane M. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer Wil SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Order to Construct.Public lmPrarements at 9549 Roberds Court .n the City of Rancho Cucamenga in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (improvements along Baee Line frontage of property) Hearing continued from December 16, 1987. It is recomended that 0iy Council adopt the attached Resolution ord3ring the Cil;- Engineer. xting as Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with the installation of improvaments at APN 202- 161 -09, if such Improvements have not been installed 60 drys after December 16, 1987, in accordance wicn Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of )vii and order the formation of an assessment district described as: APB 202 - 161 -09 Tnat land situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: TRat portion of Lot 6, Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of Rancho Cur!,eongi, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps, Page 46, San Bernardino County Records as described as follows: Commencing at a point of the North line of Use Line Goad 165 feet East of the Southwest corner of Lot 6; thence North 300.84 feet, more or less, to the South line of Roberds Court as deeded to the County of San Bernardino by deeJ recorded February 13. 1931, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; thence East along the South line of said Roberds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to the East line of the west:rly 10 xres of Lots 5 ano 6. Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence South along the East line of said Lot 6; being also the North line of Base Line Road; thence Nett along the North line of Base Line Road 160.P3 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. .N9 CCSR JANUARY 6, 1988 PAGE 2 Background /Analysis On December 1, 1987, the attached 'Notice of Public Hearing and Order to Construct' was posted In front of the property located at 9549 Roberds Court, identified by APH 202- 161 -09. This Notice was posted in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and orders the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, base pavements, street pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other incidentals therewith. The property owners are instructed, that they are given sixty (60; days, from thw day of Resolution adoption (Dececber 16 1987) to construct said improvements. After 60 days is up, the City Engineer, acting as the Superintermlent of Streets, will cause the improvements to be constructed and the property owner will be assessed for all the costs. The costs will be paid by the formation -of an assessment for all the costs. The costs will be paid by the formation of an assessment district which will include APH 202- 161 -096 and are described as follows: APH 202 -16 -09 That land situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: Th at portion of Lot 6, Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Association, In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Yaps, Page 46, San Bernardino County Records described as follows: Commoncing at a point on the North line of Base Line Road 165 feet East of the Siuthwast corner of Lot 6; thence North 300.84 feet, more of less, to the South line of Roberds Court as deeded to the County of San Bernardino by deed recorded February 13, 193:, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; thence East along the Scuth Ifne of said Roberds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to she East line of the westerly 10 acres of Lots 5 and 6. Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence South along the East line of said Let 6; beingy also the North line of Base Line Road, thence Nest along the 4orth lioe of Base Line Road 160.93 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. Upon hearing protests or objections, if any, at the public hearing, Council is requested to make a ruling and directive to staff regarding protests and direct the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Street, to proceed with said improvcments, if such have not been �sb CCSR JANUARY 6, 1988 PAGE 3 constructed within sixty (60) days, and to further order the formation of an assessment district which will include the before mentioned parcels to pnay for said improvements. Respe fu submitted, c RHN: Attachments Ire 3S/ 4 ' Flu L' s y RESOLUTION N0. '91 -6 q l - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWGA ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC ' IMPROVEMENTS AT 9549 RDDERDS COURT, APN 202- 161 -09 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 THRU 5880 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 WHEREAS, on December 1, 1987, the City Engineer acting under the authority of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga had posted at the subject location a Formal Notice to Construct Public Improvements. WHEREAS, on this date December 16, 19e7, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucarwnga has met to hear all protests or objections from any interested parties to .the Order to Construct; and upon hearing all objections, resolves in the common interest of- public health, safety and welfare for the City of Rancho Cucamongya that public improvement be -- made at 9549 Roberds Corrt and hereby resolves and otherwise issues an 'order to Construct street frontage improvements consisting- of perking lane pavements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parkway gradinyys, drive approaches and street lights and all incidentals thereto in conformance to the 'Standard Drawings' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1984 Edition with supplements through 1987, with all plans and construction work being subject to review and permrit by the Engineering Division of the Comunity Developement Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All work shall cormence within sixty (60) days of the execution of this resolution and if not comenced or provision made therefore to the satisfaction of this City Council, the City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, shill cause such construction to be wade, and in pursuance to the statutes of the California Codes for Street 8 Highways shall proceed with actiuns to assess the costs therefore as tax lien upon that real property described as: APN 202 - 161 -09 That land situated in the State of Califor*.ta. County of San Bernardino i and described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, Block d, Cucamonga Homestead Association, 4n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps, Page 46, San Bernardino County Records described as follows: � 253 - t i RESOLUTION PAGE 2 Commencing at a point of the Southwest corm to the South line'of.l Bernardino by.deed re Official Records; thei 160.93 feet; sore'or'. and 6. Block 8 of sal along the East line'o Road; thence West'al0 . more or less to the P rth line of 6; thence N urt es. deed ruin 13r,1. sold'Lot 6;'being_also�• the, North line'of Base nt of, beginning: " .Yi��y "A v(t�sla k Line Road 165 feet East DOM feet, sore.or` less, i the County, of-,San <: n Book',699;Page 185; ^• �T, ne of said Roberds_Court_, r starly 10racres�of -Lots S. lotion ; _thence South �7f, 1 a North Tina of-Base-Line iee'Road 160.93 - feet;' :r =t EEEEEg -. W I.". -of L;t2a. Silo I. 0, +Aiacladwi to Ow City of KmW Dxsawqv; sz-,pw plot rwu*d I. 46. SEE, sormartim cmaty sacs" dast,ibm a. towel 48,41; a point do the Marts Ilm of 11CAAN Lift Ra4d Ill ENE USE at the SMWwat il.. or Lit IS7 tamed 10,10,300./4 Mt. *mr,v1"s.0 is"the soith" itm -,at, loamEr", Cowt -n,. di'm's th; comri'ti-sam, lwmmm by to;* in. Ofmcfaflocardif t" Call too Fart'l - Ime of Lad inilrly 10 sca of LM f" aft -6 a of Hid mo",Assoctiiii4 taftd, I, Lot scatm III tat 6; t�ai-alftjm vft��Ita* of Ik" Lift E, &I 11w of am Lfm WE IAQ.03 dot, ft it at Ming. To.. �-trm. - t 0; to-,moom, Ed camommt OWES. restart. Mi aff"acki. - pa,ftea Is. tratfoi: cloul-I fti iroamoul U-4 all otaor'locidutals thoftAth, ong M East Load 'the"Ce un ao,awl — w tor pol $a,* swtfmp Emil coatowm Ed -SU"Lrd lkmmw too, 00 city of back 0ocasafto, ME 141tift .10 tiftlaftats ChIMP LM. All Plus OW coes-Erattift wwtfPp SWKt U Wft aad-paal% by th, DOMWEI DIVIOw of t1a, Coftwelty k"IeWat Daptremort fro t%e CIT, of All swu wortiod, "I commot, tommact,17 spon simactment of •Cr*f W C;tSOK 1 904 If Mt c ld Wtildo 10 ftj UNMAttar, the city bonier ar".9 a too woorfataMUt of I"u toall cm sash c"Ast"Ecti. to w daft ME the "It tb~ shall be a It" Wm Its promm, 0 ee (D ILk Q O -r. -,Ea 4 �t e� : ly NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND ORPER TO CONSTRUCT .m Pursuant to Sections 5875 of the California Code for Streets and Highways entitled 'Duty to Construct': 'The owners of lots or portions of lots fronting on any public ,4 street or place when that street or place has been improved by the construction of sidewalks or curbs for a total frontage of more then 1 fifty percent (50%) on one side of such street or place in any block, or whore a petition signed by the owners of more than sixty percent (60%) of ' the front footage of any part of an unimproved portion or portions of a } block has been filed with the City Clerk muazting the installation of t such improvements in front of said part, or whenever the legislative body of the City upon its pin motion; orders the installation of such improvements to front of said part, shall have the duty of constructing or causing construction of sidewalks or curbs in front of their properties upon notice so to do by the superintendent of strests'. On December 16, 1987, the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the legislative body for the City, will meet to adopt a Resolution ordering the construction of curbs, gutters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, street pavemants, base pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other inci.;entals involved therewith. Notice to Constrict Pursuant to Section 5876 of the California Codas for Streets and Highways, the City Engineer for the City of kancho fuctmonga under the direction of the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucano.:ga hereby notifies all parties holding legal pnssession of that property located at 9549 Roberds Court, more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel No 202- 161 -09 being described as follows: That land situated in the State of California, County cf San Bernardino, and is described as follows: wS: That portion of Lot 6, Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Naps. Page 46, San Bernardino County Records described as follows: r Commencing at a point on the North line of Base Line Road 165 feet East s of Ma Southwest comer o7 Lot 6; therco North 300.84 feet, more or lass, to the South line or Roberds Court as deader to the County of San Bernardino by dead Recorted Febre3ry 13, 1931, ir. Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; thence Eeat along the South line of said Roberds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to the Cost line of the westerly 10 acres of 4 Lots 5 and 6, Block 6 of said Cucamonga Homestead Assoaatlon; thence 4i South along the East line of said Lot 6; being also the North line of Base Line Road; thence Nest along tba North line of Base Line Road 160.93 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. To construct or to cause to construct curbs, gLitters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, street pavements, base payments, grading, clearing and grubbing and nil other im:identals therewith Such workings shall conform to 'Stand..a Drawings' for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1984 Edition with supplements through 1987. All plans and construction workings subject to review and permit by the Engineering Division of the Community Development Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All such workings shall commence immediately upon enactment of 'Order to Construct and. if not commenced within 60 days thereafter, the City Engineer acting as the superintendent of streets shall cause such construction to be dove and the cost thereof shall be a lien upon the property. Q6 ca. Notice of Public Hearing .f Pursuant to Section 5878.1 of the California Codes for Streets and Highways, you are hereby notified of a public hearing to be hold at ae" the Lions Park Community Center, by the City Council for the City Codhcil s of Rancho Cucamonga, to bear and pass upon protests or objections to this a ? Notice to Construct. Such meeting will begin at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on the 16th day of Deceeber, 1987. The 'Lions Park Community Ceriter;•is listed at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho- Cucamonga, California' The decisions of the City Council on all protests and objections shall be final and conclusive. Anyone having any questions or concerns on this issue is encouraged to contact the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Division, , f= Design Section, at 989 -1852 or visit the office at 9330 Base Line Road, Suite 203, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Celifornla. Anyone wishing to torment on this issue is encouraged to attend the public hearing. s� �S� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Duane Baker, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Authorization for City to Proceed with Major Maintenance in the Project Area on the North Side of Foothill Boulevard from Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue IECONVICATION: City Council adopt a policy to perform maintenance in the Cal7eans right -of -way along the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue because of the advanced deterioration which has occurred at this location. Funding for the maintenance activity is to come from the Redevelopment Agency through a budget reallocation not to exceed $20,000. (See Agency funding report) Background /Analysis The City has received numerous complaints from Citizens about the condition of the curb, gutter and parking lane along the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue. Based oa the contacts with these citizens, the City attempted to get CalTrans to perform a maintenance project in this area. CalTrans has been unresponsive to the City's requests. This location is unique in the City due to the advanced deterioration which has taken place already. It is the City's general policy not to perform maintenance work in CalTrans right -of -way but the unique situation which exists at the above location may call for an exception to the general policy. If City Council authorizes this maintenance work, the City will move to expedite the process as quickly as possible. Detailed plans for the project are in the process of being prepared in anticipation of submitting them to CalTrans whether the City does the work or CalTrans 1s persuaded to do the work. Once the plans are finished they will be submitted to CalTrans for approvals and the necessary permits to work in their right -of -way. The estimated time for obtaining permits from CalTrans is approximately 6 to 8 weeks and the City will do everything possible to expedite this procedure. Once the permits have been obtained, the City's maintenance ;?ST A-- L. t., CCSR JANUARY 6, 1988 PAGE 2 contractor will be scheduled d: do the work: Once,sArk Is scheduled. it --r weeks to complete dependingion'wedther; will take ApproximatOlY two If council approves the above work,.-staff will iml;liately,;begin the -' procedures to start this -job and it is anticipated that "the -entire project can be completed by mid April 1988. Res a f It"" aud' su 'S I nrmar nn n • vnrtn nrrn • vn•rn • 9TAFF REPORT a. S DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire• City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJEcr: Status of "Traffic Control" for Haven Avenue Medians, Phases 1 and II RECONMEMTIDM: None (information only) Background /Analysis Since the start of construction, staff has been reviewing traffic control set by the Contractors on these projects on a daily basis. In the beginning, the Contractors placed traffic control devices in accordance with accepted standards governing traffic control through cr.-:truction zones. However, because of a constant level of traffic problems, the Contractors were directed to sandblast interfering pavement markings, paint new lines at proposed locations and incraase and supplement existing traffic control devices. Because these steps have had little effect on traffic patterns or driver habits, staff has directed the contractor to further supplement existing traffic control. By the time City Council and City Managar reads this report the following items will have been in place for several weeks: 1. The Contractors have been directed to place a 4" wide painted yellow line with reflective glass beads at the. existing inside edge of pavement adjacent to the median area; and 2. The Contractors have been directed to place "breakaway" reflective paddles adjacent to the pavement edge along the median area as a supplement to the painted line; and 3. The Contractors have been directed to place "A" frame barricades with flashes at eacn proposed island nose. i M 11 1 CCSR JARWRY 6, 1988 PAGE 2 Because these directives fall well beyond standard requirements, it is considered extra work for which the contractor west br compensated. It is estimated that said work will cost 58,000 ppfiar,,fiase or $16,000 total. Based on this, a contract change nrder has been approved for both phases which will be funded from the approved project contingency. Additionally, the sheriff has increased thair visiblfty and is citing violator, as necessary. Res bmitted f :i a 1, d .n� .4 j ♦ a� ...r p .M The Mono ble Dennis Stout Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga C/o City Heil Building 9320 BAse Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mayor Stout: e5PPINGAuditorium 'The Largest Auditorium In San Bernardino County" December 21, 1987 a' Ct Uh tkty- QI� ql°L�^ ,, f" �S CpA The Gardiner W. Spring Auditorium, located on the Chaffey High School campus, is the largest and finect- equipped facility in the San Bernardino County in which to present cultural and entertainment activities for Wes_ End citizens. To date, more than $685,000 has been raised for building restoration. This money was obtained through the cooperation and interest of area business and industrial firms, foundations, and individual West End citizens. Monies are still being collected to help complete the restoration projects by February 1988. For details regarding completed restoration projects as well as the list of items yet to be replaced, please read the enclosed brochure. Although the Chaffey Joint Union High School District is willing to maintain the auditorium and will wholeheartedly support a management group, they are not in a position to manage and operate this Performing Arts facility to its fullest use. In preparation for long range planning, several community meetings have been held during the past six months with invitations extended to more than 250 business and cultural leaders. Enthusiasm and interest was expressed by this group and the initial steps were taken to establish a non - profit organization to carry on the work of operating and managing the auditorium -- -thus, on November 179 the birth of the GARDINER SPRING SOCIETY FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS... (see attached minutes of that community meeting). We are writing to each Mayor and City Council memb r within the five cities of tae West End and are respectfully requesting two persons be appointed from each city to serve as membe-s of the twenty -one person Board of Directors (see atta:hed material). These two individuals will serve as liaisons to your city and will keep the council abreast of the operations pertaining to the auditorium. Because of their leadership role in this exciting project, you will undoubtely wish to appoint two individuals with a known interest in the performing arts. Enclosed is a list of names of persons who have recently expressed enthusiasm and Lt.pport for the establishment of an ongoing program of cultural and recreational events to be held in the Gardiner Spring Auditorium ---- undoubteldly, there are others In your city who would willingly serve in this capacity. Gardiner IV. Spring Auditorium • 211 W. Sth Street • Ontario, California 91762 aroma N i� Gardiner W. Sprirg'Auditorium. PaEe 2 December 21, 1587 _ r We hope 1 -ou will be able to submit the names, addresses and telephone numbers of your two appointments by Monday, February 15, 1988. These names should be .submitted to the following: . The Gardiner Spring Society for the Perfarming_Arts c/o Sue Sundell, Assistant to the Superintendent 211 west Fifth Street. Ontario, CA 91T62 A formation meeting of the board of directors will be called early in March 198. We know you are well informed about the Gardiner Spring Auditorium and the potential It offer+ the communities of the West End. However, if additional information is needed regarding this request, please feel tree ,to call one of the following: Margaret Stewart (714) 982 -T546, Eleanor Schulze (714) 985 -2198 or Sue Sundell (714) 988 -8511. Sincerely,••_ Marwar�.t�` Chairman, Ad Hoc Marketing Committee kew enc I .?fo3 i RESOLUTION 110. ag-ct u vow Q.tdt dl . c A RESOLUT ti6OF T E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA DETERMINING THAT RECONSTRUCTION OF PORTIONS OF FOOTIIILL OULEVARD ARE OF BENEFIT TO RANCHO REDEVELOP14EIlT ., PROJECT AREA AND DETERMINING OTHER HATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO , RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the 'Agency) proposes to utilize tax Increment funds to reccnstruct the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Ramona (the 'Project'); and, WHEREAS, said Project is located within the Agency's Rancho Redevelopment project area; and WHEREAS, there is no reasonable means of fi ancing the Project other S,r than by the use of tax increment funds. Cu.Q "t9.,Anx.du..��I/ ae.,_v�Jla. DETERMINED of NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS At ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Project Is hereby determined to be of benefit to the project area gt and that there is no reasonable means of financing the Project other+ than through the use of Redevelopment tax Increment. 2. The Project is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. 3. The determination set forth in Section I hereof are final and conclusive. 4. This Resolution �+shall take effect from and after its adoption. PASSE QPTE N January 6, 1.80, by the following vot CITY COUN L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AYES: NOES: :a4 v7 `l.1 A, i CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA MEMORANDiUM � y DATE: nuary 6, 1988 TO: Mayur, Members of the City Council and Lity Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO ITEM C -15 OF COUNCIL AGENDA L�ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE iMPROYEMENT OF BERYL ... .. �. IGKS PR Funding for the increased scope of services for the Beryl /Lions Park tennis court improvements shall be from the Park Development Fund. Adequate funding is ' available under this trust fund from non- designated revenues received to date this year. The following account numbers and expenditures will be applied. ' Lions Park 20- 4532 -8006 $ 6,652.44 Beryl Park 20- 4532 -8007 $11,826.56 Upon authorization by City Council, Community Services will execute Change Order No. 1 to Recreation Systems, Inc. for a sum not to exceed $18,479.00. If you heve any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Re;ppctfully submitted, Robert A. zo Assistant City Manager RAR:DL /dja cc: Administrative Services Department - Finance l