The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/01/20 - Agenda Packet2 4 ffn ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMI ONGA l; � p nrJw D. JfIIrV U CRkbW M. DYW At6n Hb� RWvd)/. Dad PrarL J.P }Idu June 28, 1985 Aetna Life Insurance Company City Place Hartford, Ct SubJect: (2) Industrial Bldgs. 8784 and 8859 Rochester Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Owner: Lincoln Property Co. Ro. 611, A Calif. Limited Partnership 19752 Mac Arthur Blvd 0225 Irvine, Ca 92715 This is to verify that the above referenced building was inspected by this Division and complies with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code for B -2 Occupancy Group. This letter m)y be considered as a Certificate of Occupancy for the above buildings when utilized within the limits of said code. Sincerely, CC+NUNITY DEVE. — CEPARTHENT Building and Sat vision i Beverly 5;- lKi ley Public : « ••s Technician t BAH:kz `P.,4,tad[ 1.8858 Rocheatpr ,/ta7k /mlpiva% oczaloaw NI/ CASILDM ROAD. aulR C • rOe•1.OMCZ BOX l07 • L&NCDO CUCAMONGA. CALWOnMA al7)a , (7111 M411/1 .� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM TM DATSz January 18, 1988 n TJ: City council PROM: Lauren H. Wasserman. City Hamaor ' S1103ECTt FIRB SERVICES FEASIBILITY STUDY — P.ZBCUTM AHKARY 4 The fine of Ralph Andaraen and Associates has reelected a study of alternatives regarding the future delivery of fire aervfcos in Rancho Cucamtmga. The report focuses primarily on legsL issues and alternatives, and does not deal with primcry operational and management issuen since that was not a part of the study criteria. Those issues have been researched by the City Manager's staff and are no.ed at the cone Lusion of this memo. Since thin report is a coeperstiva e:fort between the Foothill Piro Protection District and the Cdty of Rancho Cucamonga, we would like to expresu our thanlu to Fire Chief L. Dennis Michael and the Fite Board for their cooperation. A. ALTKRtATIM Vol PROMING SE1710E.4 There are three feasible alternatives for providing fire protection service: 1. Creation of City Fire r+r'rtmsst. 2. Establish Foothill Fire Protection Dintrict as a subsidiary district in which City Council serves as an ex—of ficin Board of Directora. This would retain the District as it currently exists, except the District would became a legal entity of the City, and the City Council would replace the independent Board of Directors as the governing body. This change any occur either with an election or with the concurra�ce of the Board of Directors and the City Council. 3. Retain the Foothill Fire Protection District an it presently exists. a. PRACTLCAL ODHSIDKRMO? 5 CP ALY'ERK&TI 9 1. The implementation of a subsidiary district would result in no change to the area which is presently served by the District. 2. The creation of a City Fire Department would require the existents of a fire district or contract to provide service to unincorporated areas within the City's sphere. s.. Fire Services Pacnibility Study - Pxecutiva Summary January 18. 1988 S Page 2 C. OPVATICOAL ISSORS With either the creation of a City Fire ikpactment or the formation of a subsidiary fire district, provisions must be made to integrate parsonnal rules, employer- mployse relations' policies, purchasing procedures and related policies. This is not a major issue in our view. The City Council could elect to merely attend all existing policies, practices and rules to a subaidiary district or City Fire Department. D. OPPO' 'TM FOR NM CDHHS YS LCf4L SSRFICRS Both ruatives offer am opportunity for bettor coordination of fire sarviue with other related City services such as plan checking atd building /tire inspection services. The formation of a subsidiary district would eliminate one layer of goverusantal policy - making and place the authority for passaga of all lIcal laws 11th the City Council. B. FIAANCM COBBIUMMORS This is the moot rigaificant aspect of the independent conaultontrs report. Division of assets and deposition of property tax ravens, ahle significant, are determined by the Local Agency Formation Commisaicn. The formula is established by law. :f a City Piro Department is created, negotiations must take place between the City and the rLunty Board of Supervisors (on behalf of the Fire District) to determine appropriate property too allocations. 3. Disposition of Spacial Augmentation Food Revenue is, perhaps, the key factor to be evaluated when studying •lteruativea for fire protection services. The District is currently entitled to consideratirn for an allocation of foods from the Special District Augmentation Fund (SOAP). The fund van created by the legislature in 1978, after the pasesgs of Proposition 13 to provide transitional fading in mchenge for lost property tax revenuea. The SOAP is computed annually by the County Auditor - Controller. The law places very taw restrictions on how the ravanuos may be apportioned by the Board cf 2upervisora to aligib '-e special districts. Atthouah the ellocatien formula is very complex, it is significant to note tbat the Dictrier presently is allocated $1,457,509, an amount of $369,989 in mesas of what the district actually contribute& :o tLa fund. The Board of Superviocre has the discretion to reduce this amount at any time, thus making the District a net donor rather then not recipient of the fund. Thic practice has occurred in yetrr past. Y rise Sorvices Tessibility Study - Fzscutive Sumary January 18. 1988 Page 3 The SDAF is a very tmpredictable source of revenue. Thera is no asntrance that the lwa16 of support in "cons of the amount generated will be continued by the Board of Supervisors. In fact. if a subsidiary district is formed. one could argue that City funds should be aced to replace augmentation funds in excess of guaranteed amounts. Realistically, however, it may be posaiSla to negotiate a gradual phase -out of augmentation funds in order to provide a reasonable period for tranaiticu which would albs time to replete SDAY revrmas. r a legislature, for the past several years has targeted the wpocial District Auysautation Fund for elimination. While this bas not yet been assured, it is sate to assume chat this source of revenue will coutinm to be tenuous. The Fire District could be laced with an immediate 1069 of approximately $400.000 if this legislative effort is asecaasful. It is therefore critical that contingency plans be made for this if it occurs is the future. F. IIYIACRATION OF CM AND DISTRICT MMOtl FIOGROS While retirement pcugraeo for safety and nonssfaty personnel diffar in both mot and hematite, it is anticipated current benefits would coutinua as they presently exist unless changes occur through the meer -and- confer procaes at a later date. The Fire District currently provides major medical coverage for ratireas at no cost. At present, seven former employees receive this benefit at a cost of approzima:ely $16.800 annually. All present and future employees may also be eligible to receive this benefit at some future tine. O. MWM LIABI.LITT FOR VAI=09 Alm SICK LRAVR AOCRRAL Tae Fire District does not presently fund liability for accrued vacation and sick laws. County policy precludes any budgetary carry war for these liabilities. The City partially funds for those liabilities. The consultant has determine! that the unfunded district liability for past years is $479.437. However. becauoe it Is impossible to deta=in& when and order vhat circumstance employees will and employment, it is impossible to determine an actual sooner which should be budgeted for this liability. If a subsidiary district is famed, seem additional funds should be included in annual budgets in order to origin fuzdtng at least a portion of this liability. r , Fire Services Feasibility Study — fkacutive Study • January 18, 1988 5 Pose 9 b....Arr COMM)SIO! 08 CD=LTAxr IMEr 1, The future and the role.of the Spaeiel District AuC.vantation Fund is a major factor to to evaluated in any decision. Factors include not only the prcaant level of support to the Fin District but, more importantly. the ultimate continuation of the SUr. 2. An a subsidiary district, the Pottbill Piro Protection District would continue to races• a property tee tram the County. This guaranteed anavnt of $1,097.520 Pei year is approximately $570,000 long than the District is receiving this current fiscal year. However, there is no assurance that this funding level Trill be approved . the County Board Of Supervisors in future years, regardless of how fits services are provided. The total may be negotiable with the County, however. S. The future of the Spacial District Amgmentstion land in in jeopardy. If the fund is ultimately elfainetad as proposed by the State legislature. e major financial crisis would face the commmity. The issue than in who can most effectively cope with the critical financing imams. R>Q.sTxn 18SURS Thera era numerous other imams which are not a part of the consultant reports. Thasa are identified in the following section. Should the City Council wish more infornucion in any area, the staff is available to provide that data. 1. OPERATIONAL rACTORS The creation of a subsidiary district prwides as opportunity to imprwc the coordlmation between the fire nowise and the Division of Building and Selety and the Planning Division, The City has the capability to provide e,tanrive financial planning and financial support to rho firm aewice if a subsidiary district is farmed. Thera sctivit"A include not only planning for lang rezZe funding, >iut also equipment rgplaement. The fire service wenld be roamed from the direct. political process which cucrantly exists. Tao City Council would memo as the Policy—making board. This would provide or integration of fire ggmicas with other City services. The Fire Chief presently spends a considerable amount of time working with the elected board of the district. The time apent in them fw2tIOO. while exereseiy important, does take clay from the time tivr Fire Chief should be Blending on dapartmantal imams and in providing indermhip for rho employsea of the District. I � rice Services reasibili January 18, 1788 h P: udy - Esacucivs 8uamary Y i Page S 2. PERE2nM6jSSDBS if a retained Indtheirdcurr•nt positoDs,andrsatnetheir current MD would and benefit irtel. Future salary and fringe benefit negotiations will continue ritually. 3. FQDIPNSNf RSPLACSNEIpT Becaue of its policy of budgeting for equipment replacement, the City is capable of providing s. better mason for assuring that major equipment is replaced as required.. The present funding grid accounting policies of •ne District differ from those of the City beceuo .hey do not permit .Preciation of equiposat and the ccerespouding budgeting of reserves for replacement of major equipment. With the spiraling costs for becomes even sore scuco becomes, truck resates and other major fire apparatus. this problem re, 4. PMLLO -RoOS CDHNONITT FACILITIES DISTRICT The Ywllo -Roos Districts which presently ezlots !a Dot jeopardised by cbe formation of a subsidiary district. However, the formation of a separate City fire department will, according to special counsel, jaoPazdire this critical source of funding, S. REDE7MA, ?1LW AGENCY The Redeialopccat Agency of the City presently has an agreement with the rite District to provide tar increment funds cc the District to help the District letter serve the areas within the Redevelopment Agency Project area. The funds are to be approved by the City Council (acting as the Redevalopareut Ageecy Bard of Directors) orders In the following otiosity a. To financa future fire stations and training facilities, b. To finance am equipment needed to serve the project area. e. To finance personnel requir -d to serve the project area. Preaantly, foods are not available to finance additional fire personeal. It is anticipated that if a uubsidiary district in formed. there will be no net loss of funds to the community for firs, rrotecti, services. 6. RLIHINATION OF ELECTED BOARD OF DIRECTORS If a subsidiary district IN formed. the elected fire board would be alimimited and the City Council t oidd becmw the policy -makfug body for the District. Fir* Services Feasibility Study - Csecutive Summery ' January 18. 1988 Page 6 Q7f HAVAMOVO 12CONKAMATICH It is roaday app@dmtt that if the City forms a amhaidicty district the potential loss or Spacial District Avpmentatioa Funding must be carefully evaluated. while, theoretically, am such as $1.00.000 could be "lost", it may be feasible to negotiate with the Canty a gradual phase -out of augmentation funding over a pe -Sod of several years, thus minimising the impact of the potential funding loss. More inportantly, the City Cowan and lira District Board should be concerned with the long rang# funding opportunities for fire protection services. It is our vim that the future of segmentation funding is vary bleak. therefore, it is important in our viw that immediate plans be made to provide financing for the level of fire services which will be required as our community continues to grow. Clearly, the City and the Hadevelopaent Agency are most capable of providing a stable source of funds in the future. City staff in also concerned that equipment replacement nsadn to be planned. Because of the coat of major fire auppression equip.aat it in essential that fund@ be budgeted aaaaally for the eventual replacement of tiro vehicles. the City already ham an equipment replacement program. However, the lira District is unable to adopt a similar programm because of restrictiva County policy. In addition, the Fire District does not have a comprehensive policy for financing tmfunded liabilities ouch as persounal costa for accumulated vacation, sick leave, end the other bonafits paid at time of terria+tion or retirement. The City has a comprehensive program for fmdiug obese financial liabilities ate that a single year's budget Is not severely impacted. To summary, the primary consideration of the F. ro District, as wall am the City Council, should be abut is bast for the cozz pity for future decades. An sspanditurs cf foods at this time may be an "inveatment" in the future which may be necessary iu order to prevtde desirnbla levels of fire protection service to our citisame. Staff is available to assist the (ity Council sad the lire District Board if you would like any issue explored In greater detail. LYHI d1a (A Ralph Andersen 140 E,ve war •aao Waal NWM Gel N.p11.,7 6 Associates s,a,1o1 SHw 230 a,CI,I*1 ,CA 95125 eaaaa TX 75220 191W 929.5573 121417&7097 January 18, 1988 llr. Lauren M Wasserman City Manager 1, City of Rancho Cucamouga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Wasserman: This letter contains the report and analysts of our inquiry into the matter of fire service delivery methods In the City of Rancho Cuca- raonga. To assist you In your use of the report, it is organized Into the six sections listed belay: . Background of the study . Organizational alternatives . Reorganlzaelon procedures associated with the alternatives • Practical considerations of the alternatives • Financial considerations of the alternatives • Conclusions It is also worth pointing out, as will become clear by reading the report, that the areas,of research and analysis dealing with issues of operational and management integration of the fire service into .r the City structure, are not included. These aro areas of inquiry / which, at your direction, City staff are undertaking, and have thus not been part of our assignment. To the best of our knowledge, no assumptions have been relied on In our work which would be incom- patible with the work of your staff. If you prefer to present an Integrated document to your council or the board of the fire district (or others), you may feel free to incorporate our work into a broader report. BACKGROUND Fire protection services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and its entire sphere of influence, are currently provided by the Foothill i :1: , Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Two Fire Protection District. Foothill FPD is an independent special services district created in 1975 to serve an area of approximately 53 square miles, including ell of the incorporated territory of Rancho Cucamonga. The area served outside the City limits is about 20 square miles, and nearly uninhabited at present. In fact 99% of the District's inhabitants live within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For several years, the City Us been considering alternatives to the present arrangement for fire protection sery cas. Thin interest springs both frog the natural inciination of a new city (Rancho Cucamonga itself was only incorporated in 1971) to want to explore how such a major and critical service as fire prota:ciun. can be brought under the Council's policy and oversiglt directior, as well as from a period of rather difficult fiscal conditions following the passage of Proposition 13. The independently- elected Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District, too, recognized the possibility that the residents and bvclnesses of the District might be better served, all things considered, by reorganizing tho District to put it under the policy (and fiscal) auspices of the City Council. Indeed, it was the board of the District that originally proposed to the Local Agency Formation Commission such a 'transfer" to the City. Although that 1981 request was subsequently withdrawn by the District, the issue has remained unsettled. Continuing concern about the fiscal capacity of tho District and the implications that has on Its lerel of service to tam community, have kept the matter under consideration. But that is a double -edged proresition for the City A Cf:rcon- trolled Fire District might well attract heightened public pressure for making other City Fending scurc:es available for fire programs and, with significant public investments of its own to make, particu- larly In streets and parks, such competition for resources may not yet be helpful. Moreover, within the past three years, despite steady growth in the community, the financial position of the Fire 01 strict has changed soe'ewhat. Two events in particular have affectad the District's operating capacity in that time: • It has begun to be a net recipient of Special District Augmentation Fund allocations, rates than a net d—or as it was until Fiscal Year 1983 -84; and • In 1985, the nistrict approved a special tax under the Community FaciiItIes Act of 1982 (Mello - Roos), to provide additional funding for both capital and operating needs. Recently, the City Council appointed a Public Safety Commission to advise the Council on, among other things, the provision of fira protection in the City. the Commission determined that an outside consultant should be retained to offer assistance in placing the Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Three question of organizational alternatives in a factual perspective. Rai ph Andersen 8 Associates has been retained to examine certain elements of that question. Specifically, the City has asked that we: Identify the legal process and implications for iepicmentation of various alternativos to the current service delivery structure Identify the financial implications of such alternatives including consideration of special district augmentation fund revenues and contributions, the cost of integrating District and City compensation plans, the potential for cost savings relative to each service alternative, the steps necessary to establish a subsidiary district, and the provision of service to areas -utside the City but within the current Foothill Fire Protsctir', .lstrict. ALTERNATIVES There are two alternatives to the present structure of an indepen- dent special services district: • City Fire Department • Subsidiary District If the City were to create its own Fire Department, territory of the District within the City would be detatched from the District, a "change of organization• under the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. [Government Code Sec. 56000 at sew; all references are to the Government Code unless otherwise noted] The District, and its Board of Directors, would continue in existence under this alternative, but would only be responsible for fire protection to the area remaining within the District. In the specific case of the Foothill Fire Protection District, its remaining service area after detachment would contain virtually no structures and, therefore. very little base to support a program. In ail likelihood, it woulo gave to contract with another department to provide fire protection. The second alternative is establishment of the Foothill Fire Protection District as a subsidiary district. [Sec. 560781 Subsidiary districts are districts in which a city council is designated as the ex officio board of directors of the district. Accordingly, under this alternative, the Fire District would continue in much the same manner as it currently is, except that the •.x Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Four Council would replace theloind1coe dent Boards of irectors the as Cthe governing body. PROCEDURES Althougn each of the alternative organisation forms Ir distinct, the t procedures Initiate (A) own the Similar. tiate the process, and (by what is involved in the proceedings thc=gives. Because of the similarities in process, there will be sons rodundant descriptions in the following text. This is a msttar of the author's preference 1n style; ; it it per mits the reader to simply refer to a heading in the report, there to find A complete e><olcnatio.: of the process, without having to read other sections for relevant information. As indicated, however, it does lead to some rep :titious language. ALTERNATIVE I-- ESTABLISHMENT OF A CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT Of the state's 445 incorporated cities, more than 260 provide fire protection through city fire departments. It is, clearly, a pre- ferred approach to the provision of iotoi fire service. Whether it is appropriate for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. is a matter for the leaders of the City to determine. The procedure for creating a City Fire Department 1s as follows: Initiation -- Proceedings for creating a City Fire Department ec n ca y, a detachment from the existing District) are initiated by a resolution of either the City Council or the 568001, orObyeatPetitiontsig signed by not lessnthiDistrict ther[Sactlon - Five percent of the registered voters of the City, or - The owners of 5 percent of the assessed value of the land within the City. [Sec. 56755] The resolution or petition is submitted to the exeeutiva officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo), and the request has begun the forr -i process. Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Five Procead��ing�s�- -Tha proceedings consist of a series of hearings an dalf�rotIons before the Local Agency Formation Commis- sion. [Sro. 56825 at seq.' - I`• conflicting proposals are submitted, those exist first be resolved. Conflicts are 'resolved" when the commission assigns reiativa priorities to hearing the various proposals. In the absence of such a priority e- termination, the proposal received first in time by the executive officer has priority. - Within 30 days the executive officer must make a determination that the application is complete and acceptable for filing. An application will be deemed cogflate and acceptable if it contains: -- the initiating resolution or petition -- various descriptive material specified in the law [Sec. 566521. and -- the proper filing fell ha: barn paid. The executive officer thereupon issues a certificate evidencing a valid filing. - A hearing on the proposal is than set to coo nce not later than 90 days from the date of the certificate of filing. Published notice of the hearing must be given in " newspaper of general circulation published in the District not less than 15 days before the hearing date. - The executive officer of LAFCo must then prepare and make available to the affected agencies, a report on the appli- cation, together with his recommendations to the Commission. That report must be completed not less than five days before the scheduled hearing. - Once the hearing begins, it may be continued from time to time, but it oust be completed within 70 days of the original hearing date. - Ina Commission's choices for acting on the application after its hearing, are limited to; (a) unconditional approval; (b) conditional approval; or (c) disapproval. Conditional a provals may be given subject to any of the following fac�ors: Mr. Lauren M. Was:erman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Six -- Payment for the •acquisition, transfer, use or right of use of all or any part of the existing property, real or personal,...' of the District `Sec. 56844(a)] - Transfer or apportionment of liability for outstanding and authorized, but not yet issued, bonds or other contracts or obligations [Section 56844(c)] -- -The continuation of any previously authorized... special tax by a successor local agency.• [Section 56844(t)] -- The approval of the detachment by voter election, either limited to electors within the District as a whole, or just those within the City. In the specific case of the Fo)thili Fire Protection District, that difference would be largely irrele- vant. [Secs. 56843, 568491 - Not later than 35 days following completion of its hearing, the CO mdssfon must adopt a resolution with its findings and determinations. [Sec. 568521 If the action of the Commission is to disapprove the application, no . similar application far substantially the sage territory Tay be filed for a period of one year, unless the Ccmris- .Ion waives that limitation in its disposition rose - lution. [Sec. $6855] If the Commission approves the application, it moves on to a hearing and decision before the Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District. [Sec. 56029(b), 57000(bl] - Within 35 days following the Commission's resolutlo^ approving the proposal, the secretary of the Board of Directors sets the proposal for hearing and publishes notice of the hearing no less than 15, nor more than 50, days after that notice is published. [Sec. 57002] - Once the hearing before the Board of Directors gets under,ay, it rust be concluded not later than 60 Gays frw its commencement. [Sec. 57050] At the hearing, the board will consider both written and oral protests; however, only written protests are used in determining whether. as a matter of law, the proceedings Host be abandoned. Me. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Seven - Within 30 days of compiettng its hearing on th- proposal, the Board of Directors must adopt a resolution waking a t finding regarding the value of wrften protests received, and do one of the following: -- Terminate the proceedings if there has been a majority protest -- Order the change subject to confirmation by the voters in an election if more than 25 percent, but less than 50 percent, of the registered voters or at least 25 percent of the number of owners of land who also own at least 25 percent of the assessed value of land within the territory affected, have filed and not withdrawn written protests, or -- Order the change without election if there have been valid protests from less than 25 percent of the registered voters or less than 25 percent of the number of owners of land owning less than 25 percent of the assessed value of the land in the territory affe .e: by the reorganization. [Section 570751 - If the rzsolutior. of the Board of Directors tills for confirmation by the voters, it must also address all the technical and procedural questions of the election. [Sec. 571001 Unless there is an agreement between the City and the Board of Directors providing otherwise, the costs of the election could be the respcnsibiiity of the Fire District [Sec. 571571 - Customary past - election activities take place, including an Official' canvass of the results and, if the mature is successful, the LAFCO executive officer prepares a certi- ficate of completion with descriptions of the newly - changed district, which is recorded in the official record; of the county, and a boundary description 1s filed with the state board of equalization. (An alternative procedure for the withdrawal of newly - incorporated cities from fire protection districts under Health end Safety Code Sections 13801 at seq., is no larger available in initiated withithis ne yeariof an lrcory incorporation.) must be Mr. Lauren. M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Eight ALTERNATIVE II-- REORGABIZE AS A SUBSIDIARY DISTRICT OF THE CITY If the determination is made that operation of the fire service is best conducted as a separate entity, but under the policy direction and oversight of the City Council, the law provides for reorganizing the present independent district as a dependent district of the t t for such a change 7be of he land area 70% of the registeredvo ers of e District within tie City limits. Sec. 57085(b)] Both of those minimum conditions can apparently be satisfied in the specific case of the Foothill Fire Protection Distrief Ina proceduras for accomplishing the reorganization are as follor : . Initiation -- Proceedings f•r, reorganization as a subsidiary salT -Mcf —are Initiated by a resolution of either the City Council or the Board o: Directors of the Fire Protection D: crict [Section 56800' bi - petition signed by not less than 5 percent of either: - The registered voters or _.. District, or registered voters boundaries of the i Districtin [Sec. 56760] but the specific case of the Foothill Fire Protection Dis- trict, this condition does not exist. The resolutions or petitions are submitted to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission. Proceed in s- -The proceedings consist of a series of hearings an a orations before the Commission. [Sec. 56825 at sew.] - If conflicting proposals are submitted, those oust first be resolved. Conflicts are •resolved' when the Comission assigns relative priorities to hearing the various proposals. In the absence of such a priority determination, the proposal received first to time by the executive officer has priority. - Within 10 days of receiving a proposal to form the subsidiary district. LAFCo must ratify the District which is the subject of the proposed reorganization - Within 35 days after receiving LAFCo notification, the Board of Directors of the District may do either of the following: Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Nina -- Adopt a resolution consenting to the proposal, with or without requesting additional terms and condi- tions -- Adopt a resolution of intention to file an alterna- tive proposal to the subsidiary district proposal. [Sec. 568291 If such a resolution is filed, the District has 70 days in which to submit a completed application for the alternative proposal. If the prescribed time elapses without the filing of the required application, the DisErict is deemed to have consented to the subsidiary district proposal, notwithstanding its original resolution to the coatr r;. if both the resolution of Intention and tho follow - up application for an alternative are tinily filed, all subsequent hearings are conducted so as to con- sider both the original, and the alternative, propo- sals simultaneously. Once the hearing is finished, the Commission has the following policy choices: . Deny both the original and the alternative proposals Approve om proposal and deny the other, or . Approve both the original tad the alterna- tive proposals. Where the Commission takes this action, it must then direct the county board of supervisors to- consider bath pro- posals simultaneously and take any one ;f the Sam three approval or disapproval actions, namely, to approve one or both, or deny both proposals. [Sec. 56831] - Provided the original application to form a subsidiary district is not challenged, a hearing on the proposal is then set. Published notice of the hearing must be given in a newspaper of general circulation published in the Oistrict not less than 15 days before the hearing date. - The executive officer of LAFCo must then prepare and make available to the affected agencies, a report on the appli- cation, together with his recoemendations to the Commission. That report must be completed not less than five days before the scheduled hearing. Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Ten - Once the hearirg begins, it may be continued from time to time, but it must be coapleced within 70 days of the original hearing date. - The Coamission's choices for acting on the application after Its hearing, are limited to; (a) unconditional onYi(b io approval; disapproval. Condit' may b given s SJect to any of a number of facture, among them the following ones: -- Transfer or apportionment of liability for cutstanding and authorized, but not yet issued, Leads or other contracts or obligations [Section 56044(c)] -- 'The continuation of any prvsviously authorized... special tax by a succesaor local agency.• [Section 56844(t)] -- Confirmation of the reorganization by voter election, either limited to electors within the District as a whole, or Just those within the City. In the specific case of the Foothill Ftre Protection District, that difference would be largely irrelevant. - Not later than 35 days following completion of its hearing, the (omission east aJopt a resolution with its findings and determinations. [Seca. 56851 - 568521 If the action of the Commission is to disapprove the applica- tion, no similar application for substantially the sawn territory may be filed for a period *of one year, unless the Commission waives that limitaticn in its disposition resolution. [Sec. 56855] If the Commission approves the proposal, with or without condi tions, in whole or to part, it mores on to the County board of supervisors for a second hearing. [Secs. 57000(b), 56029(d)(4)] - Within 3 5 days following the CONT313sion's resolution approving the proposal, the clerk of the board of supervisors sets the proposal for hearing and publishes notice of the hearing not less than 15, nor more then 60, days after that notice is published. [Sec. 570021 - Once the hearing before the board of supervisors gets i�ox its commencement. LSec�ud57050jt Attthetheari6ng,dthe board will consider both written and oral protests; Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga page Eleven however, only written protests are used in determining whether, as a mutter of law, the proceedings West be abandoned. - Within 30 days of completing Its hearing cn the proposal, the board of supervisors must adopt a resolution making a finding rugarding the value of written protests r&cmved, and do one of the following: -- Terminate the proceedings If thers has been a majority protest -- Order the change subject to confirmation by the voters in an election, or -- Order the change without election if both the City Council and the Board of Directors of the Fire District have adopted resolutions consenting to the establishment of the subsidiary district, unless by valid asignatures flat least 10%eoftthe registered voters of the District has been received, in which case, the board must Call an election on the question. [Sections 57077, 57087, 57087.5] - If the resolution of the board of supervisors calls for confirmation by the voters, It must also address all the technical and procedural questions of the election. [Sec. 57100] - Unless there 1s an agreement between the City and the board of supervisors providing otherwise, the costs of the election would be the subsidiary district's If the election is successful, or the county's if it Is unsuc- cessful. - Customary post- election activities take place, including an official canvass of the results and, If tha measure 1s successful, the LAFCo executive officer prepares a certi- Cate of Completion with descriptions of the newly- changed district, which 1s recorded in the official records of the county, and a boundary description is filed with the state board of equalization. Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Twelve PRACTICAL COSIDERATIONS OF THE ALTERNATIVES Each of the alternative orianl:atien structures has considerations alternative. The econsic. rat on IsfIdentified,attractiveness aobrief discussion of its significance. . Provision of service outside the Cit -- I�lementetion of the su s ary s r c e erne ve wou cause no change to the current arrangement for service outside the City. The district would continue to have this responsibility. The detachment of territory (to create a City Fire Department) would likely result in the creation of a District to name only. That is, it appears likely that the District would not have staff, and only limited assests, and would contract with the City, or some other entity, for fire service In the District. . Political Power- -Under either alternative to the current rue ure, a oard of Directors of the Fire District would have significantly reduced powers. As noted, creation of a City Fire Department would likely mean the District would merely exist to collect property tax revenues with which to Pay a service contract. The subsidiary district alternative would result in the complete elimination of the Board of Directors, replaced by the City Council. . 0 eratlonal tote ration es a Fire De artment - -Toe creation of a y ra epar n wou repo re I a crevt; integration of the fire service into the municipal system, or such things as: Personnel rules - Employer-employee a y s and procurement e licis Budgeting rules and practices In practice, the City Council could extend all those policies, practices and rules to the subsidiary district as well, but it could also elect to twat the district as a self - contained entity with its own operating and managennt environment. Opport.nit for more cohesive local services - -Both a - e o r a r n r n'i]ratea' local service plaaning. While detachment may present certsln management options In the way of organization structures that a subsidiary dlstr might not, e.g., an eventual public Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Thirteen safety department, the more placement of the fire service program under the policy direction of the City Council removes an institutional barrier which should result in more coHsive service delivery capability. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS Among financial considerations, are some which LAFCu would aRke with the particl atlon of the parties, and others which would be matters of local dPscretion. Specific financial considerations of signifi- cance include the following: . Division of Assets- -LAFCo sakes the final determination as to v s on o asssts between City and District. The determina- tion 1s part of the terms and conditions of the change of deFetachment nfromctthe Districtjs (the although t in Fire the Deppartment tha City Health Districtfe$halldnegotiate for 4siix months to that attempt Yo reach a mutually agreeable division. If no agreement is reached, LAFCo makes the detarminaNnn_ u,s usnron or ro ere tax revenue- -The District's property Tax increment s TEs—largest source of operating funds, and is determined through A complex set of formulae deriving current tax allocation from a base year allocation in 1978 -79. If there is an established redevelopment project ere& under the Community Redevelopment Law covering any pert of the Dis- trict's territory, as there is in this care, the annual growth in property value of .a redeveloment area is pledged to the Redovelopment Agency (RDA) for as long as the RDA has outstand- ing banded indebtedness for the project area. The affect of this tax diversion to the Redevelopment Agency, 1s that the District can anticipate only its constitutional inflation adjustment of 2% per year to provide any growth in its prop- erty tax revenue. In the else of the detachment alternative (creation of City tax entitlement) ist the dsubjectifirst for negotiation between the lurisdictionai artles, with the board of srpervlsors negot99ating on behalf of the Fire District, for a period of of cure thin 30 days [S� Lions 99(b)(4), 99(b)(5) of the avenue and Taxation Code The amount of property tax subject to such negotiated exchange between the District and c� Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Fourteen the City is first established by the County Auditor within 45 days of A notice from the executive officer of LAFCo regarding the filing of an application or resolution initiating Reorgani- zation Act proceedings. [Sec. 99(b)(3) Rev. and Tax. Code) At the conclusion of the negotiation for exchange of property tax between the parties, the Board of Directors of the Dis- trict must adopt a resolution determing to exchange some por- tion of its property tax revenues, and the City Council adapt a resolution agreeing to accept the exchange. [Section 99.4 Rev. and Tax. Code] The fire protection district Is prohibited from making any exchange of property tax, however, if the transfer will impair the ability of the district to provide •existing servicts.• Capacity9�Off) the ] posthdetacheente Foothill Fire the Protection District to meat the statutory test. In the case of the other alternative -- formation of a sub- sidiary district -- no exchange of property taxes takes place. The subsidiary district retains the increment of the formerly independent Foothill Fire Protection District. The District's property tax allocation in fiscal year 1986 -87 was anticipated to be approximately $1,8S8,0oo, including both secured and unsecured tax rolls, and H.O.P.T.R. and supplemen- tal rolls. For FY 1987 -88, the County estimates those tax receipts at $2,247.600. EXHIBIT ;--ESTIMATED FISCAL CAPACITY OF-UM IUM--tUOTHILL D Assessabla Total District Estimated Assessed Estimated Land Share Assessed Value Value Portion Tax Increment 26% $2,733,481,347 ¢33,798,359 $39,950 The assumption regarding the Exhibit above is that a negotiated tax exchangt involving a detachment from the Fire Protection (District would be agreed to on a strict tax increment basis (tn at hleastcone r-centt del area. That might ServicecArea 038, no tax increment at all was transferred to the new Mr. Lauren M. lirsserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Fifteen provider agency.) For purposes of this report, however, that sort of tax split is assumed and, on that basis, leads to a forecast that the post- detachwnt Foothill FPO would have $39 950 In property tax receipts, measured in today's dollars. It seems likely that the District could contract with an adjacent fire service for an annual amount net exceeding its revenue. It could, thus, meet the statutory test imposed by Section 99.4(f) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, regarding non- impairment of present services in the remaining area of the District. It seems reasonable to expect that the City would almost have to state Its willingness to serve the District's area, both for reasons of proximity to fire stations, and because the area 1s in the City's sphere of influence. It strikes us as likely, that LAFCo would resist permitting other agencies (with the possible exception of CSA 09) to express any strong interest in serving that area. pCSA /38 has no station in the a�n�allowancee for oneeded tcapltapproach l expenditures atin sthatnegotia- tions accompanying the detachment proceedings. Dis osltlon of S etial District Au eentatlon Fund revenue - -As an Independent Spec-a s r c , e oo ,re rd action District is currently entitled to consideration for an alluca- tion ista creattoniof thetLegislaturetin the iFimmediate after- math of Proposition 13, meant to relieve total anxiety nver the un:ertair:ia; or how essential services would be funded with substantial losses in property tax receipts. Section 98.6 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides for the Fund and describes its allocation to eligible districts. Essentially, districts which levied a property tax for opera - tians at the time of Proposition 13 are considered for an allocation from the Fund. Foothill Fire Protection District meets that requirement. The Fund is generated each year by the action of the County Auditor- Controller in withholding portions of districts' tax increments for distribution by the Board of Supervisors. The law places nearly no restrictions on the excercise of the Board of Supervisors' policy discretion in this distribution. Until fiscal year 1983 -84, the amount of withholding from each district f fu ddin SDAc grew with changing property value in the respec��we alstr�icts. The Lepislature, in one of the more significant subsequent amendments to the original statute, w i, Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Sixteen established the FY 83 -84 amount as the maximum amount for future years' withholdings. E:chibit 2 below traces the Fire District's recent experience with the Fund. As Exhibit 2 indicates, the District's experience with the Fund has been bath advantageous and disadvantageous over the past 8 years. It also shows the first decline in real terms in the current year's allocation. EXHIBIT 2-- Alfr=NTATION FUND 4ITHHOLDINGS l;ND ALLOCATIONS 4 Fiscal Year Geenerated Al oeattd Yartanca 1980 -81 $ 820,419 ; 651,853 $(168,366) 1981 -82 973,443 731,236 (242,519) 1982 -83 1,070,206 884 572 f ) 1983 -84 1,097,520 1,120,823 123,303 1984 -85 1,097,5 ?0 1,152,184 54,664 1985 -86 1,097,520 1,401,920 304,400 1986 -87 1,097,520 1,488,959 391,439 1987 -88 1,097,520 1,467,509 369,989 The presence of Special District Augmentation Fund revenue has been a principal focus of attention in past discussions relating to the reorganization of the District. That seems understandable In view of the early years' experience with the Fund. When the Foothill Fire Protection District flied its aPPilcation for reorganization as a subsidiary district with LAFCo to 1931, it had had what it believed was an unacceptable track record with the Fund, resulting to the "Joss• of substantial program revenues for several years. Indeed, as a subsidiary district, Foothill would have received over $242,000 more to property tax revenue in that year than it did as an independent district. The District's annual allocation from the Special District Augmentation Fund is its second largest source of operating Income, eclipsed only by the property tax increment. Together, the proparty taxes and Special District Augmentation Fun daaCCallocation constitute approximately 95% of annual budget slgnlflcantre butedeel into SDAF allocations alone comprise a finan- cing Exhibit 3 on the declining. portion of the Districts finan- fng page tabulates the contrlbu- 'r• a Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Seventeen tion which Augmentation Fund revenues have mwsde in finincing the District's budgets over the recent past. EYWIBIT 3-- AueffNTATIDN_FUMU REYEhVFS The experience of the Foothill Fire Protection District with the Special District Augmentation Fund points up two important considerations: - The "und is an unpredictable source of revenue to place ve -/ much reliance on. It is little consolation to local district policy makers and managers that the legislative intent concerning the Augmentation Fund was that it should do no more than bridge a fiscal gap at a tumultu- cus ties. Too precise distribution approach saployoc by the Board of Supervisors is left to their discretion, and as development disproportionately affects assessed values around the County, each recipient district may find its allocation going up or down. - The future of the Special District Au9moatation Fund is itself uncertain. After nearly ten years since the Passage of Proposition 13, there are 1.'yislative vorces expressing the view that a decade is long enough for local agency leaders to come to terms with the new fiscal climate. As a subsidiary district, Foothill would be entitled to receive the entire amount withheld annually for the Augmentation ,-Und by the Count Auditor- Controller. in FY 88, that amount would be $1,097,520 (as it would be annually under present low). However, as Exhibit 2 shows, the independent Foothill Fire Protection District will actually receive over $1,457,500 in the current year. Budget Augmentation Fiscal Year Amount Amount Per Cent 1982 -83 $1,882,534 $ 884,572 47% 1983 -84 2,126,260 1,120,823 63% 1984 -65 2,459,737 1,152,164 47% 1985 -86 2,916,184 1,401,920 48% 1986 -87 3,552,163 1,488,955 42% 1987 -88 3,873,000 1.467,509 38% The experience of the Foothill Fire Protection District with the Special District Augmentation Fund points up two important considerations: - The "und is an unpredictable source of revenue to place ve -/ much reliance on. It is little consolation to local district policy makers and managers that the legislative intent concerning the Augmentation Fund was that it should do no more than bridge a fiscal gap at a tumultu- cus ties. Too precise distribution approach saployoc by the Board of Supervisors is left to their discretion, and as development disproportionately affects assessed values around the County, each recipient district may find its allocation going up or down. - The future of the Special District Au9moatation Fund is itself uncertain. After nearly ten years since the Passage of Proposition 13, there are 1.'yislative vorces expressing the view that a decade is long enough for local agency leaders to come to terms with the new fiscal climate. As a subsidiary district, Foothill would be entitled to receive the entire amount withheld annually for the Augmentation ,-Und by the Count Auditor- Controller. in FY 88, that amount would be $1,097,520 (as it would be annually under present low). However, as Exhibit 2 shows, the independent Foothill Fire Protection District will actually receive over $1,457,500 in the current year. Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Pago Eighteen With the other alternative -- detachment to form a City Fire Department -- ue have assumed a straight exchange of the District's tax increments from all affected tax rate areas. Under fiscal year 1987 -88 conditions, that exchange wou�9 increase the City's property tax receipts by $3,185,600._ Because titles are not affected by the Augmentation Fund, the City of Rancho Cucamonga would not receive an SDAF allocation for Its fire service; nor, however, would its property tax increment for fire service be subject to a withholding. . Integration of District and City ension programs--At the specific request o e lty, wa eve exam examined ie matter of Integrating the City and District pension programs. Our exam- ination was not conducted from the standpoint of establishing vesting rights, or of expressing an opinion concerning pension law, but rather of identifying for the City the costs of making the two systems compatible. The District is a member of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), with 48 of its employees covered by the safety employees program (the so- called CHP program), and 7 employees covered under the more limited non - safety program. Safety employees may retire at 50 years of age at 2% of their highest annual salary per year of service, while non - safety may retire at 60 years of age with 2% per year of service. Under either of the two organizational alternatives described In this report, the fire employees would simply continue as at present, unless and until collective bargaining changes those programs. As for a cost to the City, there would be no •cosy on behalf of retirees, since PERS programs are actuarily fixed and, hence, the cost set on a current basis in the form of rates. It should be understood, however, that the safety retirement program i' an expensive program; at present contract rates, the District pays 23.7% of salary for each covered employee, versus 18.5% for miscellaneous, non - safaty employees. Of more significance in tens of 'cost' of retirees to the City, is the District's Meyers - Geddas contract for major medical coverage. Meyers - Geddes is a state program adminis- tered by the Public Employees Retirement SysteA, which entitles retirer to continue to receive medical coverage at no cost. At pre.ant, the District has 7 such foizer employeas alT� she an average increment of 11.8% applied to $2.7 billion value Mr. Lauren N. 4asserstan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Nineteen for which it pays approximately $16,800 erch year. In the extreme, each of the District's current 55 teployees would one day be entitled to the same benefit. Unfvnc'ad lieb111t for accrued vacation and sick leave - -As wMr many agenc es, a re s roc as s or ca y net been concerned with funding its accrued liability for the vacation and sick leaves earacd by its employees. Under its present personnel rules and /or Memoranda of Understanding, the District permits an accrual of up to 552 hours of vacation leave and an unlimited amount of sick leeva, of which some portions may be converted to vacation, and some portion may be paid in cash at retirement or other non - disciplinary separa- tion. Although these liabilities are now expensed and funded on a current year basis, there is an accumulated, unfunded liability for past years, in the amount of $475,437. Because it is not known when, and under what circumstances, employees will separate from the service, the actual amount which this accraal will require in the form of cash payment, can also not be known. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of our examination of thz issues which the City of Rancho Cucamongya asked Ralph Andersen a Associates to undertake, the following findings and observations Pre summarized: . There are two alternative organization structures for the delivery of fire servico besides the independent district: - Detachment from the Foothill Fire Protection District end formation of a City Fire Department - Reorganization of the current independent Foothill Fire Protection District to establish it ds a subsidiary district. There are practical considerations to each alternative, none of which would appear to be very compelling for the outcom There are financial considerations to each alternative which such nthingsrasythe divisionlof assets andtliabilities. andithe exchange of property taxer. Mr. Lauren.M. Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Twenty . The role of the Special District Augmentation Fund appears to continue to be a principal decision criterion. but only in the short -tens: - As a subsidiary district, the Foothill Fire Protection District would receive Its property tax withholding back intact from the County. The amount of the withholding, at least under present law, would be $1,047,520 per year, versus more than $1,157,500 it will actually receive this year. On a purely financial basis, that Is not a very attractive proposition at the moment. However, the Augmentation Fund is an unpredictable long- term revenue source, as the District's own experience over the past eight years illustrates. It Is not incon- ceiv.ble that in taming years, the District might once again become a net donor to the Fund, rather than a net recipient as it has Se-e- -for the past five years. - One should also take into account the uncertain future of the SDAF program itself. In view of the legislative Intent in creating the Augmentation Fund program, we beiieve its eventual repeal should rot be regarded as unlikely. - As a City Fire Department, the program would not be sub- ject to the Augmentation Fund. In place of an Augmenta- tion Fund allocation, the City would have negotiated an exchange of property taxes with the District. While it is impossible to be certain about the amount of that exchange, It could be up to the full amount of the Dis- trict's present increment from tax rate areas lying within the City limits. . In the case of a detachment to form a City Fire Department, It appears that the post- detachmnt Foothill Fire Protection District would have the fiscal capacity to contract for what would essentially be wiidland fire protection in its pared down service area. It seems equally likely that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department would have to be prepared to provide that contract service. Not only would the City Fire Department have the nearest station facilities, but the contract service area is in the sphere of Influence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and would otherwise present LAFCo with a dilemma it might decide to resolve by derying an application for a detachment. mf , '-_` ."i 'ate :J {rF�,ttSd t', ,.�Sd. :�r✓µ..'��`�.u".ci "'.L.�t ��' "..`��.w i Mr. Lauren M. Wassarman City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Twenty One C A t i f i t t i t Ralph Andersen d Associates 1s pleased co have had the opportunity to be of service to the City. If there are othar quosItons of intdrest in connection with this matter, we are available to assist unuar a Technical Services Agreement. dinoerely, Walter K. Munchhalmer Principal Consultant (0312F) H ! PAGE Arwyz��Z)l City Council Agenda January 20, 1988 1 All items oubmitted for the City Council Agenda rust be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. an the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Roil Call: Brown Buquet Stout 3; fµ� , King _, _, and Nr ght _. x• B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESEN ?IQIONS ,r 1. Presentation of a proclamation to Loyd Goolsby and Carlos Silva thanking them for their assistance during the earthquake on October 1, 1987, in the City of i Whittier. ' 2. Presentation of a proclamation to Janis Frost, Elizabeth .,, ��' Gallarini, and Diane Williams for their time and efforts in coordinating the Tenth Year Anniverary Celebration. i C, CiiSEMT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be y routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: November 4, 1987 December 2, 1987 December 16, 1987 January 6, 1988 2. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 1/6/88 and 1/13/88 1 and Payroll ending 1/7/88 for the total amount of $2,846,706.31. 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Or Save General 4 Eating Place, Nappy Valley Restaurant, Michael C. Tan, 7203 Haven Avenue. < PAGE City Council Agenda ' January 20, 1989 2 '+ 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General L1 Eating Place, Sheyly's, Suta$itra Chaloeicheep and Laverna Gilbert, 3038 Haven Avenue, Suite 'E'. 5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Bear and Mine 13 Eating Place, Oriental House, Rasmee Makarabiroeya, 3038 Haven Avenue, IA. 6. Approval to transfer funds in the amount of $1,230 from LS (Overtime) /Con (Maintenance and Oper for (3) Protocol ergo needed to operate the City owned RMS /CAD terminals r authorized in the 1987 -88 Budget. r 7. Approval to aware a contract to John Bolin Maintenance 17 and Janitorial Service for the performance of custodial services effective January 25, 1988, through the balance of this fiscal year for a contract amcunt of (, $4275 /ronth. B. Approval to award and axecute Professional Services to 19 Aareemant (CO 88 -08) with Morris- Repke, Inc., prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates for 19th Street from Zircon to Amethyst, for a fee of $56,100.00 to be paid from the Systems Development Fund. [$ 9. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 6 (CO 85- 24 S 57) for Etiwanda Storm Drains with Associated Engineers for .ork on an hourly basis for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 being funded by the Drainage Fund for the s Etiwanda area. %r 10. Approval to award the Ftiwanda Avenue Cobblestone Curb 26 and Gutter, Phase I, Improvement Project located on the east side of Ettwanda Avenue from victoria Avenue to 263 feet north of Victoria Avenue, and on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue from 10 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing to 280 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad C,ossin5 to DeArmond Construction for the amount of $,d,238.50. •r r •w1 f! V(l `J E r, PAGE City Council Agenda danuary 20. 1988 11. Approval to accept the construction of 'Traffic Signals 28 at Three Locations' Improvement Project, with new t�afflc signals at Base Line Road /Alta Cuesta Drive, Base Line Road /Amethyst Street, and Archibald Avenue /Ninth Street, and with traffic signal controllers installed at Bsse Lina Road /Carnelian Street, Base Line Road /Archibald Avenue, Archibald Avenue /Arrow Route, and Arrnw Reute/Etiwanda Avenue as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion' and approve the final contract amount of $145,795.00. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -029 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CONSTPUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THREE LOCATIONS, LOCATED AT BASE LINE ROAD AT ALTA CUESTA DRIVE, BASE LINE ROAD AT AMETHYST STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT NINTH STREET, AND WITH TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS INSTALLED AT BASE LINE ROAD AT CARNELIAN STREET, BASE LINE ROAD AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT ARROW ROUTE, AND ARROW ROUTE AT ETIWANDA AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE F -ING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 12. Approval of Parcel Map 9180, located south of Ninth 30 Street and west of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Landeo Financial Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -030 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 9180 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 9180) 13. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 33 Security for CUP 87 -07, located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malvern Street, submitted by Quality Development Company. 0 City rci Agenda January 2 20, 1988 j PAGE 4 -- PESOLUTION MO. 80 -031 34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCF.HOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING I1jPPOVEHEMT AGREEID:NT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 87 -07 14. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for: Tract 10076 - located on the south side of Banyan Street 36 etween rchibald Avenue and Pe.mosa Avenue. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $12,85C Tract 11626 - located on the nor0 side of Almond Street 37 west of Beryl Street. Maintenance Guarantee Cash Land (Street) $66.300 Tracts 12319 12319 -1 through �8 - located ca the 38 northwest corner of errs s1 to Parkway and Sprvre Avenue. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $125,038 Tract 1 ?316 -1 - located on the south side of Base Line 39 Road west UT Deer Creek Channel. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Streit) $45,830 15. Approval to accept Improvements, Relp.z of Bonds and Notice of Compintion for: OR 84 -13 - located on the south side of 6th Street, east 40 of ArcWTbald Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $39,230 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -031 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOP. DR 84 -13 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Parcel Na 8902 - located on the southeast corner of 42 Grave venue and San Bernardino Road. J� ,i 0 �4. City Council Agenda AAW January 20, 1988 PAGE °"'- 5 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $74,000 RESOL11TION NO. 88 -033 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 8902 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 16. Set public hearing for February 17, 1988 - Aporoval to 44 Annex DR 87 -OS and CUP 87 -07 (Industrial / Commercial area) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 13. RESOLUTION NO. $8 -034 45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF rRELIMINARY FPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT ifik ANNct%1`10 NO. 13 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE O1STRIC) NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 68 4)35 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUA40GA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT104 tO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTLHANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS AhNF.XATION NO. 13 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISIn1CT NO. 3: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AHD PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 17. Set public hearing for February 17, 1988 - Approval to 54 Annex DR 87 -05 and CUP 87 -07 (Industrial /Commercial area) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I as Annexation No. 36 and to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 9. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -036 55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION ND. :6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. �A A ` L. f • 11 City Council Agenda ti January 20, 1988 PAGE, ; 6 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -037 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 36 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 88 -038 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -039 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING 17S INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING 'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR (NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 0. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. PAGE City Council Agenda tj. January 20, 1 988 7 VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN E DM NT 8 -02 - C Y OF R N 0 C MONG - n enoment to prov a proce urez or requesting dification of rail service development standares and to authorize "medium wholesale storage and distribution" as a permitted usa in Subarea 13 bounded by the I -15 Freeway on the east, Buffalo Avenue on the west, approximately 280' south of 8th Street on the north end approximately 1,335' north of 4th Street on the south and approving issuance of a Negative Declaration. ORDINANCE NO. 333 (second reading) 73 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -02 ADDING SECTION G.6 TO PART III AND INCLUDING "MEDIUM WAREHOUSING STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION" THE INDUSTR ALDAREAS SPECIFIC PLANU(ISP) 13 OF 2. TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 87 -04 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - request to mo y t e land use es gnat ons from Office Park (OP), Community Commercial (CC) and Commercial (C) to Community Commercial within the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077- 421 -05, 06, and 13. ORDINANCE NO. 334 (second reading) 75 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY TERRA VISTA PLANNEDGCOMMUNITYOAMENDMENT08 7 -04 TO MODIFY THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM OFFICE PARK (OP), TO (C) AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO OFFICE PARK (OP) AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) INVOLVING A 71 ACRE PARCEL WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND SPRUCE AVENUE - APN 1077 - 421 -5, 6 AND 13 E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The public lhearingsItems assrequired by law. erThe and/or Chair will en the meeting to receive public testimony. �t~ ti � :• 0 • E PAGE City Council Agenda January 20, 1988 1. ENVIRONMEMTAL ASSESSMENT AND OEV:LOPMENT REVIEW 86 -27- 85 IFORNI FINISH 0 METALS 1'" o t e P ann ng Cass en's decision req ,r,- oodergrounding of existing overhead utiliti:I a' ng 7th Street for a proposed warehouse addition In the Gtneral Industrial District (Subarea 5) located oA the southeast corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street (APN 209- 262 -13). (Continued from January 6, 1988 L+ty C,uacil Meeting.) 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87- 92 L- U - .e appeal of the Planning omm ss on decision conditionally approving the development of an 8.2 acre integrated shopping center consisting of tour (4) retail buildings totaling 87,581 square feat in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APH: 208- 261 -58. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACID CONDITI0% USE PERMIT 87- 202 41 - ITVT 0 it appea o t e P ann ng Commission's decision denying the development of a school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation /maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the eaat side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202 - 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three (3) mature trees. 4. ORDER TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE NON- VEHICULAR ACCESS 235 IGNT UN H O T LL ULEY RD Tw N SPRUCE AND L F. U S. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -040 236 A RESOLUTION OF TIE :ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF THE NON - VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES \_ J 0 C PAGE City Council Agenda Janurry 20, 1988 I 9 h :1 S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSNLNT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 239 AMENDMEN B0 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development District p from Lcw Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Medium High Density Residential to General Industrial, Subarea 1, for 4.31 acres of land, located north of Oth, east of Grove Avenue and west of Dakar Avenue - APN: 207 - 541 -60 and 207- 251 -12. CRGSNANCE NO. 335 (first reading) 255 AN ORDUUNCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UEVELOPNEIT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 87 -10, REOUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIiIHATION FROM MEDIUM -HIGH AND LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207 -541- 60 DAD 207 -2' -12 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN 239 AMENDMENT 87-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - request to am— e�� Yn ustr a pec c Pan to expand Subarea 1 to include 4.31 acres of land generally located east of Grove Avenue, north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN: 207- 541 -60 and 207 - 251 -12. ORDINANCE NO. 336 (first reading) 256 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONE LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207 - 541 -60 AND 207- 251-12 6. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: (continued from January 6. 1908 A. ANNEXATION NO 34 FOR TRACT N0. 13444 OR 85 -06 AND 257 P. RI U L N 6GHDnT H .1 Y TO blKLLT L164TING KqINTENANCE O STR CT NO. 1. h :1 •' __ PAGE it City Council Agenda p January 20, 1988 10 _ 4 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -024 259 A RESULUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 34 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR " TRACT NO. 13444, OR 85 -06 AND OR 86 -39 B. ANNEXATION ND. 7 FOR OR tl6 -39 NORTHWEST CORNER. OF 268 9TH STREET AND HLLM NU INO R L C R AL 0 STREE LIGHTING 1—J(i IHTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6. RESOLUTION 110. 88 -025 270 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 86 -39 r F. PUBLIC HEARINGS ' • The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPEED LIMIT- 276 Recommendation to establish a 35 M speed limit on Leman Avenue between Sapphire Street and Archibald Avenue. ORDINANCE NO. 337 (first reading) 280 A;1 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.20.010 AND 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COnE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 414 r, w t /City Council Agenda PAGE January 20, 1988 11 o 1. REPORT ON HISTORY POLTLIES AHD PROCEDURES OF DUST I 284 N RO NFOR ENT R ULATIONs. - Pursuant to ust control concerns n Terra V sta. H. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requestcd by the City Council for discussion. Tney are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. 1. DISCUSSION OF TREE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM - STOUT. 2. DISCUSSION OF LIGHT POLICY FOR RED HILL PARK - WRIGHT. 287 I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to adiress the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council way receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five Inutes per Individual. K. ADJOURNMENT I, Beverly 4. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 15, 1988, sevcnty -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Line Road. 0 November 4, 1 ^87 City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council Minutes Regular Meetino A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongs met on Wednesday, November 4, 1987, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The reeting was calldd to order at 7:30 p.m, by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Couneilmembers: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet, II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Deputy City Clerk, Debra Adams; Legal Counsel, James Markman; Community Development Director, Jack Lair; Sr. Administrative Assistant, Mark Lorimer; and City Planner, Brad But ar. f f 1 f f f B. ANNOONCENEMTS /PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of proclamation commending William Holley for service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as Community S3rvices Director. B2. Presentation of a proclamation go Gary Schafer for service and leadershlo as a member of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board of Directors. (THIS GAS ROMEO FROM THE AGENDA AT THE REMT.OF 6ART SCHAFER) B3, Mr. Wasserman introduced Larry Henderson as the City's new Sr. Plannzr 84. Hr. Wasserman stated the the Resolution No. for Item CIS should be changed to 87 -610, Item C32 would be removed from the agenda, and Item E4 should be changed to Ordinance No. 330. f r f s s f C. CONSENT C41.ENDAR Cl. Approval of Minutes: August 6, 1987 August 13. 1987 September 8. 1987 September 16, 1987 September 22, 1987 El City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 2 ® V. C2. App -oval of Warrants, Register No's. 10/21/87 and 10/28/87 and Payroll ending 10/14/87 for the total amount of $1,010,271.69. C3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 1987. C4. Approval to authorize appropriation of $82,000 in Fund 12 (SS 325 /Transportation) for a traffic signal on Foothill Boulevard at Turner Avenue. (ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUIISION) C5. Approval to authorize the City of Rancho Cucaninga to capitalize for fixed asset purposes only, those software programs -hich are considered public domain software. C6. Approval to authorize the assignment of an Adult Crossing Guard to the corner of Hermosa and Mignonette (hamilton street) for Deer Canyon School. C7. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12642 located on Milliken and Highland, submitted by Kaufman and Broad. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -582 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12642 C8. Approval of maps, execution of Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Improvement Agreements and Improvement Security for Tracts 13279 and 13443, located in the Victoria Planned Community, submitted by the William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION no. 27.683 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RARCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13279 RESOLUTION NO. 87364 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13443 RESOLUTION NO. 87385 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R/YCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT Wlrll THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF RECORDATION OF APPROVAL IF COVENANTS, City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 3 CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NOS. 13279 AND 13443 C9. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 86 -42, located on the north side of Arrow Route, between White Oak Avenue and Maple Place, submitted by David Leff. RESOLUTION NP. 87 -586 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 86 -42 CIO. Approval to establish an amount required of a devalopment as a contribution in lieu of the construction if Median Islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Arrow Route. RESOLUTION NO. 87-687 A RESOLUTION OF 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND ADOPTING A CONTRIOUT104 AMOUNT PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN FROM ® 4TH STREET TO ARROW ROUIE WITHIN THE CITY IF RANCHO CUCAYONGA C11. Approval to execute an Agreement (CO 87 -170) for Engineering Services for Map and Plan Check with Dan Greek and Associates for FY 1981.88. C12. Approval to award and execute the Professional Services Agreement (CO 87- 179) for the construction surveying and staking for the Haven Avenue Medlai.s, Phase II Improvement Project to Hackett and Kranzer Surveying, Inzorporated for the amount of $15,178.00 to be funded from beautification Funds. C13. Approval of the name West Greenway for the next Developed Neighborhood Park to the Terra Vista Planned Community. C14. Approval to award and execute a Irofessional Services Agreement (CO 87 -181) with Jeffreys and Associates Field Services to prepare Right -of -May Appraisal Acquisition Services for 19th Street from Hermosa to Cartilla Avenue. Such work to be done for a fee not to exceed $18,67a 00, plus projected costs of $3,600.00 for escrow fees, title report, etc., to be funded from Systems Development Fund. CIS. Approval to execute Lien Agreement (CO 87 -182) between Frank A. Klaus and the City of Rancho Cucazonga for Street Frontage Improvements for Mr. Klaus, property, located on Baker Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -610 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, City Council Ainutes 1 November 4, 1987 Page 4 y CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT FROM FRANK A. KLAUS ANO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME C16. Approval to execute Contract Change Order, Number I (CO 87 -142) to the Archibald Avenue Realignment Project, increasing structural cross sections of Archibald and Highland Avenues and increasing the contrart amount by approximately $36,000.00, which will be in addition to the 105 contingency originally budgeted. C17. Approval to execute Contract Change Order, Number 1 (CO 87 -021) for Professinral Services Agreement with Norris - Repke, Inc., to perform design administration services for various projects. C18. Approval to execute a Prcfessional Services Agreement (CO 87 -183) with Purkiss -Rose Associates to perform Landscape Inventories and Master Beautification Plans for Maven Avenue Parkways and Base Line Road Parkways for a fee not to exceed $57,590.00 to be paid from the Oeautification Fund. A 104 contingency to be established to be used under the approval of the City Engineer. C19. Approval to award the Ramona Avenue, Reconstruction Improvement Project between Victoria and 19th Streets to Inland Constructors for the amount of $85,670.60. C20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for CUP 86 -06 (Parcel Map 9670, Parcel 2) located on the northwest corner of Sixth Street and Buffalo Avenue, submitted by Kinsley -Neon Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -588 A RESOLLIT104 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMtMr SECURITY FOR CUP 86 -06 (PARCEL HAP 9670, PARCEL 2) C21. Approval to authorize Mayor to sign and execute all necessary documents to open and close escrow on 5702 Amethyst. C22. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 87 -184) for InstailaLlon of Public Improvement and Dedication between Dorothy A. Reichers and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements at 9635 Base Line Road. RESOLUTION NO. 87389 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CPA IFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM DOROTHY A. REICHERS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME el- e; City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 5 C23. Approval to execute Ggreement (CO 87 -185) for Installation of Public Impro.ement and Dedication between Herman Pempel and Helen N. Pempel and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements at 9505 Base Line Road. RESOLUTION NO. 87350 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM HERMAN REPEL AND HELEN H. REMPEL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME C24. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids- for the Vineyard Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Improvemont Project, from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTIOW NO. 87391 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE °VINEYARD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECr:NG THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C25. Approval to release cash deposit in the amount of $628.00 to Norris Advertising E Design for Subdivision Identification Dign for Vintage Place Development, Tract 12772. C26. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for: Tract 12091 - located at the northeast corner of Gth Street and Grove Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Cash Bond (Street) $102,000 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,200 RESOLUTION NO. 87392 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12922 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK OR 85 -40 - located at 10789 Civic Lenter Drive. E ryf City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 6 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 32,000 RESOLUTION No. 87-593 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 85 -40 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE Of COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CUP 83 -22 - located on the southeast corner of Helms and Hampshire Street Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 3,500 RESOLUTION N0. 87.691 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC!IMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMEMTS FOR CUP 83 AND -22 AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C27. Approval of public cable access consulting services with Telecoamunicatlons Management Corporatlo.r (TMC) (CO 87 -186) in the count of $4,200 in support cf a Coemunit educational management program with Chaffey yCollege. (ITEN PLLED government access FOR DISCUSSION C28. Approval of a Resolution approving the transfer of control over the Scott Cable Cormunications Franchise RESOLUTION NO. 87.695 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OVER THE CITY FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH SCOTT CABLE CONMRiICATIONS, INC Approval t rito appropriation f 4 withir Fund 42 Nandswe 2 Victoria,' for the Ro te to School Directional Plaques Project. C30. Set public hearing for December 2, 1987 - Approval to Annex Hellman Avenue Parkway for Tract Ho. 12238 (Northwest corner of Hellman Avenus and Church Street to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 39. E City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -596 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 39 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -597 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Clif OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TG ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNE O. 1N PURSUANT Tr THE LANDSCAPING rAND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING 09JECTIOIIS THERETO C31. Set public hearing for December 2. 1987 - Approval to Annex OR 86 -42 (Industrial COMMereial) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 9. RESOLUTION NO. 87.698 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCFO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REFORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 9 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION N0. 87.699 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TYE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION f0 ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATI(II1 AS ANNEXATION NO. 9 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT HO. 3; PURSUANT TO TiE LANDSCAPING AND LWiTIN4 ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AHD PLACE FO1 HEARING OBJECTIUIIS THERETO C32. Set public hearing for December 2, 1987 - Approval to Annex Parcel Map 8842 and 7829 (Terra Vista) tr Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 an Annexation No. S. (ITEM DELETED FROM fAENDA) RESOLUTION NO. 87 -600 A RESOLD fION CF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLCA90HGA, CALIFGhNL4, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t City Council Minutes ' November 4, 1987 Page 8 RESOLUTION N0. 87-601 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATIONi N0. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brosm to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 4 and 27. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Discussion of Item 4. Approval to authorize appropriation of 582,000 Avenue. in Fend 12 (SB 325/Transportation) for a traffic signal on Foothill Boulevard at Turner Counctlmember Buquet asked that this Item b: pulled so he could state that 'Na was glad this was happening. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Stout to approve Item 4. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Discussion of Item 27. Approval of public cable access consulting servic6s with Telecommunications Management Corporation (TMC) (CO 87 -186) in the amount of $4,200 in supppoort of a public, educational find government access management program with Chaffey Community College. Counctlmember Wright asked where the funds were coming from for this. Mr. Lorimer, Sr. Administrative Assistant, explained this for Counctlmember Wright. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to approve Item 27. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. • 4 1 f t f 0. CONSENT ORDINANCES Deputy City Clerk Adams read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 325, 326, 328 and 329. 11 sv ix City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 9 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87-02- WILCIAM LYON C N'ANY - A request to change the land use and zoning designations from edium (4-14 dwelling units per acre) and Nedium -High (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) Residential to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for a 24.67 acre parcel within the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Land and Milliken Avenue - APN 202 - 211 -13 and 14. ORDINANCE HO. 325 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -02. REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM MEDIUM (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MEDIUM -HIGH (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 24.67 ACRE PARCEL WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMt7JNITY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LAND AND MILLIKEN AVENUE - APN 202- 211 -13 v.o. n. b. M..R COI o, -O, - "M DEVELOPMLN 5 N - app Cat On LO amen the Oeve opment D str ct Map 00 ontrola�Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acr, Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 65 acres of 1 located on the we3t side of Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenue - APN 271 -55. ORDINANCE NO. 326 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP, ODA 87 -07, POh 'FLOOD CONTROL* AND •MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL- (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR I , 1XIMATELY 63.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER .r MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND ,o.r.E FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 3. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 3 08 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COOF. AND ADDING A N W CH P LR 3 0 FEL ING PU N NG ORDINANCE NO. 328 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING NEW CHAPTER 3.08 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PURCHASING I City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 10 O RESOLUTION NO. 87-602 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITv OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING THOSE PURCHASING POLICY AND AUTHORITY LIMITS PERTAINING TO THE PURCHASING PROCEDURES OF CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE PANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE n Ann nkwac oarvcwrrflN - aNFNnNFNT TD CHAPTER 19.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDINAi," NO. 329 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PnOVIDING FOR FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Nright to approve the Consent Ordinances as read. Motion carried unanlmourly F -q. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded King to AF. ,.ve Resolution No. 87 -602. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. E ADVERTISED PUBLIC _HEARINGS - ine proJecc wca�wua o�� a. ..�.._.� ... -.. -- _.._ _..._ __..__. _. at 6th Street, haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, Base Line Road at Spruce Street, Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue. The proposed improvements consist of the installation of traffic signals and safety lighting. Mayor Stout opened the meeting the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -609 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY 1,IGHTING AT SIX LOCATIONS BEING: HAVEN AVENUE AT JERSEY BOULEVARD, AT 6TH STREET, AND AT CIVIC CENTER DRIVE; CARNELIAN STREET AT VINEYARD AVENUE AND AT RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE; BASE LINE ROAD AT SPRUCE AVENUE City Council Minutes ' November 4, 1987 • Page 11 El i! MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve Resolution Ito. 87 -609. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. • s � s � s 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87 -01 - CITY OF 2APCH0 UC CNGA - An amendment to T t e 1 of the Municipal cod pertaining to the definition of State mandated recycling facilities and the criteria for design, location and operation of such facilities. (Item continued from 10/21/87) Staff report by Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner. Mayor Stout asked if the new shopping centers would have these facilities Incorporated into them. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that this would be planned for in a new parking lot situation. Discussion took place as far as color, venting of these and screening for the facilities. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Stout did not feel every market should have these facilities. Deputy City Clerk Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 327. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -576 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87 -01 ADDING SECTION 17.04.080 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA PERTAINING TO STATE MANDATED RECYCLING CENTERS WITHIN COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE ZONES ORDINANCE NO. 327 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPNIA, ADDING SECTION 17.04.080 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE REVIEW AND ESTABLISHMENT OF RECYCLING FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 327 for November 18, 1987. Resolution No. 87 -576 should also come back at that time for approval. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. I City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 'age 12 7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87 -02 - CITY OF RAN CUCAMONGA - n amen went to t e eve opment Lode at the City orlWnc ucaaon -cam Ordinance 211, to revise Section 17.12.040 pertaining to upgrade of parking allocation standards and to require enclosed garages for all apartment and condominium projects; and, to revise Section 17.08.090 pertaining to upgrade of General Design Guidelines for parking areas in multiple family development; and, to revise Section 17.08.040 pertaining to upgrade of minimum residential unit sl--e. Staff report by Allen Warren, Associate Planner. Councilmember Wright asked the difference in parking spaces for apartments, condos and townhouses. Mr. Warren stated there was no difference. Mayor Stout felt the CUP should be more specific as to what they were looking for and wanted this added to tha Ordinance. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Stout stated that units under 1,000 will not be allowed unless there is exceptional design so that it does not look like it is an easy exception to make. ORDINANCE NO. 211 -A (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING DEVELOPMENT COD: AMENDMENT 87 -02, AMENDING SECTION 17.12.040 PERTAINING TO PARKING ALLOCATION STANDARDS AND CACLOSED GARAGES, SECTION 17.08.090 PERTAINING TO GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PARKING AREAS, AND SECTION 17.08.040 PERTAINING TO MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL UNIT SIZE OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ORDINANCE NO. 211 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by King to - #e full reading of Ordinance No. 211 -A and set second reading for November 16, 1987 with recommended changes. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. This should be placed under advertised public hearings because of changes being made instead of consent ordinances. • s : � e e 11 u s S] r City Council Minctes November 4, 1987 Page 13 8. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Chapter 10.4�of the Rancho ucamonga Mun c pa o e Dy amen 1ng Section 10.44.130 and adding a new Section 10.44.140 authorizing the immobilization and /cr remuval of vehicles from public streets and highways, parking facilities and handicepped parking spaces. Staff report by Richard Alcorn, Cade Enforcement Supervisor. Councllmember Brown asked how serious this problem was. Brad Buller, City Planner stated a survey had not been taken as to how many vehicles this involved, but thE: it would cut down on the amount of time spent to take the necessary action or these situations. Councilmember Buquet added that this would assist the Sheriff's Department. Mr. Wasserman commented that this was ,lust another tool to get these things taken care of faster because they could be taken care of without contacting the Sheriff's Department. Mr. Alcorn was asked approximately how many of these per week he handles. He answered probably 2 per day. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Ray Stumm4n, Lily Court in victoria, who indicated that there had been 1 case where it was taken care of immediately, but reported of mother problem on Snapdragon where it is a real problem. He asked the Council not to take this lightly. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Deputy City Clerk Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 330. ORDI%CC NO. 330 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COURCIL 07 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 10.44 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COOS BY AMENDING SECTION 10.44.130 AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 10.44.140 AUTHORIZING THE IN40BILIZATION AND /OR REMOVAL OF VEHICLES FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, PARKING FACILITIES AND HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES, BY DESIGNATED CITY EMPLOYEES NOTION: Roved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 330 and set second reading for November 18, 1987. Motion carried unanimously s.o. { City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 14 9. ORPSRING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH• A. ANNEXATION NO 5 FOR PARCEL MAP 10884 TO STREET LIGHTING MAIIRERAfiCE OISTR RESOLUTION NO. 87 -603 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAROnGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NP. 5 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10884 B• ANNEXATION N0. 23 FOR TRACT NOS. I3542 -1 13:75 AND 10414 TO STREET GH ING NT HANC 0 TRI I I NO j RESOLUTION NO. 67-604 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 23 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1, 13475 AND 10414 C. RESOLUTION NO. 87.605 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 32LT00ST STREET ORDERING L LIGHTING MAINTENANCECDISTRICTYNO. I AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1, 13475, 13353, 10414 AND P.IRCEL MAP 10884 D. ANNEXATION NO 7 FOR OR 86-21 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Ni RESOLUTION NO. 87 -606 A RESOLUTIOd OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 APD ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 86 -21 ANNEXATION NO. 38 FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1 13475 13353 AND 10414 TO L NOSC PE iNTENANCE DISTRICT H I. 11 u 0 City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 15 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -607 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 38 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOP. TRACT NOS. 13542 -1, 13475, 13353, AND 10414 Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, gave staff report on the above annexations. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the Public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution Nos. 87 -603, 604, 605, 606 and 607. 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted 0 se r,w♦ e G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS G1. UPDATE ON MOBILE HOME RENT STABILIZATION - Progress report as to the development o the Mobiie Home ark ccor and other rent stabilization options. Staff report by Mark Lorimer, Sr. Administrative Assistant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Jack Williams, President of RCMORE and Rancho Cucamonga mobile home resident, gave history of the Accord and how it was established. He also stated the concerns of the mobile home park residents regarding the Accord, i.e., expenses that the mobile home park tenants are being asked to help pay for. Clay Hague, Western Mobile Home Association, stated he was representing the owners In the Accord matter snd stated their position. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Oiscussi0n took place between the Council and Mr. Hague with questions on his viewpoints. City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 16 E Counctlmember Cuquet asked him why no one vas pulling mobile home permits in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. Hague stated that 1) an owner would not want rent stabilization, 2) the land was so high priced, and 3) he had heard that Rancho Cucamonga did not want any more mobile home parks. Counctlmember King made the comment that at the last meeting he sat in on with the owners and residents that he felt the owners were asking for a tittle too much. Counctlmember Wright asked If we could go ahead and adopt Ordinance Ho. 245 and if there was any time limit as to when the second reading on this Ordinance had to be completed. Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated he would have to take a look at it. He felt that time was of the essence and that they should get going on establishing this Ordinance for adoption. Mr. Markman also stated he did not want the new Ordinance to have higher rates than what the owners were proposing. Harry Badum, Alta Laguna Mobile Hors Park, made the statement that If the Accord ran out in December and if the owners raised the rents, it could not be effective for another 60 days, bringing the effective date March 1, . 1988. Mayor stated the following options: 1. Continue negotiating for 2 more weeks 2. Seek the RFP proposal which couldn't .cvad for 2 more weeks anyway because it requires expenditure of funds. 3. Jim Markman, City Attorney, suggested that instead of an RFP, in the same 2 weeks we are continuing to negotiate, look for someone to do the study and bring it back to Council so that if progress was not substantial they could move immediately on it. He indicated he would continue looking at the Ordinances and start updating the legality of these provisions. The City Councii agreed with the above option stated by Mr. Markman. Mayor stout wanted this Item to come back on the November 18, 1987 agenda. * * * * * * `J 0 City Council Minutes November 4, 19P.7 Page 17 G2. TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 TREE REMOVAL - CITATION - Review of proposed tree removal for a residential subdivision of 74 sing a amity lots on 32.6 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwsnda Specific Plan, located on the east side cf East Avenun at Catalpa Street - APN 227 - 071 -07, 11 and 20. Staff report by Scott Murphy, Associate Planner. Coun ilmember Buquet felt something should be done so that this matter does not keep coming up repeatedly. Councilmember Wright felt the development should be made around the trees. Mayor Stout did not feel that these particular tree were worth saving just to keep them in a tract. Couneilmembor Wright stated that the Planning Conmission will tpprove a tract and the landscaping in spite of what the Ordinance says. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this could be brought back at the next meeting with more Information to give an overview, go to the Advisory Commission for review and then back to the City Council with a report. ® Mayor Stout felt 4 healthy trees could be left as according to the Ordinance. Councilmembers Brown and Buquet concurred that 4 healthy trees could be left and that this issue should be addressed once and for all. Councilmember King agreed with Councilmember Wright's suggestion to build the development around them. He couldn't see the point in leaving only 4 tree:. Councilmember Wright wanted to abstain from this issue because s`e felt t,.oc to vote no w:uld mean to leave the trees in the middle of the -fight of way and because she was not originally here when the first trees were originally approved. NOTION: l;,ved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve the tree removal pe--3it a, submitted. Motion carried 4 -0 -0 -1 (Wright abstained). Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:05 p.m. with all members of tl.t Council present. . f a a f a F] i City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 18 G3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES FINANL�II L - PVeeaaT pf squ,tre foot bank built District, located on 1 Drive - APR 208- 622 -36. on 1.5 acres of sout,.aast corner id in the Haven Haven Avenue and IHTRASTATE nga 2,d3 enue Overlay ivic Ceuter Mayor Stout stated this had been a split decision of the Planoing Commission. He felt it looked like apartment parking and was also concerned with the material used on the bottom of the building. Bill Workentine, Costa Use Architect of the building, gave background on the design of it. 03n Richardson, Architect, stated how he felt about the design of the building. Mayor Stout stated his concerns were the material on the bottom and the parking area design. Councilmember King thought it looked fine and that the City Council should not be getcing so picky with regard to the building design. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright that the material on the bottom be changed and that the parking be enclosed tuck- under. The City Planner is to approve the color for the building. Notion carried 4 -1 (King voted no). R R f f f f G4. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE LAND USES FOR 1.85 ACRE SITE 4DJACE�^ TO WINDROWS PARK. Staff report by Brad Buller, City Planner. Discussion took place on the traffic situation as far as weekddy vs. weekend. Mayor Strut opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the Council were: J'm Bailey, William Lyon Company, explained w%y he felt this design should t.e a daycare center. Dee Maloney, Vice President of La Petite Academy, explained why she felt the dtycare center should t.e allowed. She also offered a portion of their property to the City to do with what they wanted. She said she would make their center available fc• Scout meetings or nhatever, but she just wanted to know from the residents what they wanted to use it for as long as it did not interfere with the preschool use. Ms. Maloney also indicated they would like to form a committee of Victoria residents to Inform them of their concerns. City Council Minutes Novemb2r 4, 1987 ® Page 19 Councilmember Wright asked if they would be competitive vith 02 schools win let groups use their facilities for a fee. Ms. Maloney said they are not there to make money on the groups that would use their facility. Mayor Stout asked how hard it would be to bring back an ordinance whicn would require a CUP for these types of uses in the Victoria Planned Community. Mr. Markman stated that was a good idea and that it should be done. Phil Henderson, President of ACTIVE, stated they would like to be more involved in the design making process of the community. Harmon Angelo, Victo ^ia resident, submitted a petition from the Victoria residents asking the William Lyon company and /or the City to conduct a traffic study. He also felt that when they bought their homes they were given Incorrect inforeation as to what was going in at that location. He felt this particular site should be a church. Susan Jeble, Victoria resident, stated she apposed the daycare center. She ip felt the daycare center should go at another site within Victoria. Sandra Kaiser, 12363 Dov -i Tuck Drive, stated she is against the daycare center and felt this site should be turned Into parking for the W'ndrows Park. Doug Lyon, Victoria resident, stated he Is against the daycare center. He also stated he was expecting that particular site to have a church. Andy Solarzano, 12813 Coriander Court, stated he is against the daycare center. Ray Sturman, Victoria resident, felt the daycare center should be In the middle of Victoria. Jim Bailey, William Lyon Company, addressed the issues that were raised by the Victoria residents. Councilmember King did not feel this was a community facility. Councilmember Wright felt it was a commercial operation in the middle of a residential neighborhood. Councilmember Brown felt that traffic was a real problem around the daycare center. She did feel that La Petite was doing what they felt was best. City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 20 ACTION: Staff to immadiately go back and change the Ordinance which would require a CUP on certain uses. La Petite can go ahead with their protect if the change in this Ordinance has not occurred. The City Attorney is to research the Planning Commission minutes to see if this is an actual legal use. Approved 0 -0. H. COUNCIL BUSINESS H1. Discussion of setting workshop dates for Rancho Cucamonga 2000 protect (goals). Councilmember Wright stated she did not want r name on her list of goals. Hr. Wasserman stated that only staff would see them. Mayor Stout said he would like to see a list of all of the goals. ACTION: November 18, 1987 was set for the date of the goals workshop. H2. Mm netie- Levitation Train Terminal - Discussion of a resolution rcyuesting the ounty Boar a Superr sors to adopt a resolution requiring the approval of any affected city prior to the location of a Magnetic - Levitation Train Terminal. RESOLUTION NO. 87-608 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUaERVISORS TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF ANY AFFECTED CITY PRIOR TO THE LOCATION OF A MAGNETIC- LEVITATION TRAIN TERMINAL MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to appror: Resolution No. 87 -608. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FGR NEXT MEETING Councilmember Wright asked why the lights are on at the parks if there are no games taking place, specifically at Red Hill Park. Mr. Wasserman stated he would send a letter to the leagues to take care of this problem. f . f • . R E • City Council Mbmtes Noveruber 4, 1987 Page 21 , J. COWUNiCATIOKS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. K. AOdOURAW MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to adjourn. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. Meeting adjourned at 12:55 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Adams Deputy City Clerk Approved: t t: 'i/ December 2, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meatina A. CALI. TO DRDE A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, December 2, 1987, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:31 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout, Pres�it were Councilmembers: Deborah 11. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman, Assistant City Manager, Robert Rizzo; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; City Attorney, James Markman; City Planner, Brad Buller. City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Administrative Services Director, Jim Hart; Sr. Administrative Assistant, Mark Lorimer; Assessment Revenue Coordinator, Jerry Fulwood. • B. AMMOUICEWEM/PRESENTATIONS St. Councilman Buquet presented a report from the SANDAL meeting held earlier that day. 2 He stated that the S4NBAG beard has be7un efforts to revive Measure A and hopefully place the measure on the November 1988 ballot. SB498 pertains to the creation of a social services transportation advisory council. The legislation becomes effective July 1, 1988 and each commission has been asked to have its advisory council membership appointed prior to February 4, 1988. Regarding the clean air act, he stated Supervisor Jon Mikels had attended a congressional briefing in Washington, D.C. Sponsors of the briefing agreed on a six Point frame work for a re- authorized clean air act to control ozone and carbon monoxide, which included regular reductions, deadlines, more local authority in determining our own prograo, sanctions in failure to meet a deadline of twenty years, and support of control for indirect sources. He also announced the City Selection Committee had selected a representative under the SSISI provisions. The co=ittee had appointed Carole Beswick, the newly elected Mayor to the City of Redlands. Mr. Buquet requested that staff prepare something for Faye Dastrup who had held this position for five years for her services. a a a a w a r IM City Council minutes December 2, 1987 Page 2 C. CONSENT CALENDAR Cl. Approval of Minutes: September 16, 1957 and October 21, 1987. C2. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 11/18/87 and 11/25/87 and Payroll ending 11/12/87 for the total amount of $1,039,561.06. C3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 1987. C4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer 8 Wine Eating Place, China Star, Inc., Lin, Ching -Hsi, 9638 Base Line Road. CS. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer E Wine Eating Place, The City Deli, Bill C. Underwood, 9135 Archibald Ave.. Unit F. C6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Eating Place, E1 Rancho Grande, Freida L. S Richard P. Wilkins, 9893 Highland Avenue. C7. Approval to enter Into an ogreement (CO 87 -197) for Janitartal /custodial services with American Buildirg Maintenance Company for offices located at 9320, 9330, 9340, 9360 ease Line Road; the Neighborhood Center, Lions Park Community Center, Heritage Prrk building, and offices at the Corporate Yard, for a cost of $2,341.08 per month with additional services to be performed at a cost of $8.50 /hr , effective December 1, IS87. Additional services are those that are outside of the normal contract, i.e., painting, plumbing and electrical work. C8. Approval to receive and accept the fiscal year 1986 -87 City Audit as presented by City independent auditors Lance. Sell and Lunghard. C9. Approval of reimbursement agreement (CO 87 -198) between the Alta Loma Channel Capital Ieprovenent Fund and the Reserve Fund in the amount of $65,000. CIO. Approval of reimbursement agreement (CO 87 -199) between the Victoria Landscape District No. 2 and Engineering's Beautification Fund No. 21 in the amount of $300,000. C1I. Approval to seek requests for proposal to select a landscape architectural firm to develop working drawings for the construction of Cucamonga Creekside Pirk. C12. Approval ,f sole source lease purchase of FMC Sweeper from Kern Equipment Co., In the amount of $106,511.15 to be paid in five (5) annual payments of $21,302.23 each. )�J 0 City Council Minutes December 2, 1967 Page 3 C13. Approval and execution of a 3 -Party agreement (CO 87 -199) between the Chaffey Joint Union High School District, The William Lyon Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for certain off -site stregt dedications and improvements for Rancho Cucamonga High School to be located at the northwest corner to Victoria Park 'Lane and Rochester Avenue and authorizing the Mayor to sign the same. C14. Approval of Disaster Preparedness Budget including appropriation of $34,915.00 from unallocated reserves. CIS. Approval to release a portion of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for undergrounding of overhead utilities for Lots 4 and 6 if Parcel Map 10543 locatad at Jersey Boulevard and Red Oak Street, submitted by Arrow Rancho Cucamonga Limited, a California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 07 -634 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA, CALIFORNIA. RELEASING A PORTION OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGRELNEUT FROM ARROW RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LIMITED, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C16. Approval to execute contract (CO 31 -188) for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at Civic Center Drive Improvement Project awarded to Hovey Electric, Inc. for tha amount of $70,762.00 to be funded from TOR, Article 8, funds. C17 Approval to award the bid for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at Sixth Street, Haven Avente at Jersey Boulevard, aid Beseline Road at Spruce Street Improvement Project to Hovey Electric for the amount of $215,901.00 to to funded from TDA, Article 8, funds. CID. Approval to award the bid for th3 Traffic Signals snd Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue and Carnelian Street at Pad Hill Country Club Drive Improvement Project to Moore Electrical Contracting for the amount of $133,777.00 to be funded from TOA, Article 8, funds. C19. Approval to award the bid for the Vineyard Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement Project between Arrow Highway and Foothill Boulevard to Fontana Paving. Incorporated for the amount of $104,892.60 to be funded from Systems Develeyaent fund. C20. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -201) for the Ramona Avenue Reconstruction Improvement Project between Victoria and 19th Streets awarded to Irland Constructors for the amount of $85,670.60 to be funded from Systems Development Funds. H d City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 4 C21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10277, located on north of Almond Street, east of Carnelian Street, submitted by The Barmakien Company. RESOLUTION HO. 87 -635 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMCNT AGREE14CMT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10277 C22. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 to C.O. 86 -131 with W1111Amson and Schmrd for Victoria Basin Drainage Study for an amount not to exceed $6.288.00 to be paid from Drainage Facilities Fund for Etiwanda. C23. Approval of the concept for the proposed alignment for Hillside Road between Amethyst Avenue and Klusman Avenue and direct staff to prepare a General Plan Circulation Eleaent Amendment. Councilman King requested item be removed for discussion. C24. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10210 - Almond Intercert Channel, located on Almond Street at Sapphire Street, submitted by Forecast Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -636 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10210 - ALMOND INTERCEPT CHANNEL C25. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10210, located on Almond Street at Sapphire Street, submitted by Forecast Corporation. RESOLUTI03 NO. 87 -637 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10210 C26. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 87 -22 located on the east side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Messenger Anita Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 87-638 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -22 • is City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 5 C27. Approval of Drainage Acceptance Agreement (CO 87 -202) for Parcel Map 9972 (DR 86 -13) located northerly of Ninth Street, easterly of Vineyard Avenue, submitted by Anthony D. Lucas, Nellie K. Lucas, and First Trust Bank, trustee under the Leon F. Lucas revocable trust agreement. C28. 4proval of Parcel Nap 10902 located at Fairmont Nay and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 87-639 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10902 (7ENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 10902) C29. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 87 -2031 with ASL Consulting Engineers to prepare plans, specifications and estimates for 19th Street and Haven Avenue Intersection, the maximum fee is $15,918.00 plus utility exploration costs, if high pressure gas lines exist and suggestion to do so by utility company. To be funded from Systems Development Fund. C30. Approval of Agreement (CO 87 -204) for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Maurice Mandel and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9480 19th Street, located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -640 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM MAURICE KANOEL, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SiGN SAME C31. Approval of Agreement (CO 87 -205) for Installation of Public improvement end Dedication between Julia P. Marlscal and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvement at 9832 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -641 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JULIA P. nARISCAL, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME liter. City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 6 C32. Approval of Agreement (CO 87 -206) tor Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Shirley A. Jovin and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9892 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner. RESOLUTION 110. 87 -642 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR11I4, ACCEPTING AN ACREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM SHIRLEY A. JOVIN, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME C33. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 86 -39 located on the northwest corner of Helms Avenue and Ninth Street, submitted by Louis M. Barnes. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -643 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -39 C34. Approval of designation of Rancho Cucamonga in local telephone directory. Joanne Johnson from the audience requested Item be removed for discussion. C35. Approval to release bond in the amount of $2,500 fo: conversion of model home office to original garage for Tract No. 12237 -2. C36. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and file a NotlCa of Completion for: Parcel Ma 9896 - located between Milliken Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue and between 4t an 6th Streets. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $155,000 Faithful Performance Bond (Landscape) $140,000 RESOLUTION NO. 87-644 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACEEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL NAP 9896 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Parcel Meo 9687 - located on the North East Corner of Santa Anita Street and 4th Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 72,000.00 Cv E City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Paye 7 RESOLUTION N0. 87-645 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9687 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. CUP 85 -3: - located on west side of Haven Avenue north of Foothill au eve Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $109,000.00 RESOLUTION N0. 87 -646 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 85 -37 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Parcel Map 8815 - located on the west of Beryl Street south of 19th Street and north of Base Line Road Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 7,546.00 i" RESOLUTION NO. 87.647 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 8815 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C37. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for: Tract 11915 - located on the southetst corner of Arrow Route and Turner ven ule'e Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 18,800.00 338PH Set 8345)blocatedroe hefor north January ABrrow RoutelwestaofiHavnBAvenue. to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 41. RESOLUTION N0. 87 -648 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COCIL OF CALIFORNIA. OF RELIMINARYRAPPROVALNOF ICITYFENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 41 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 H ,i r City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 8 e RESOLUTION NO. 87 -649 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING 5410 ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 41 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. It PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C39. Set public hearing for January 6, 1988 - Approval to annex OR 86 -39 nerthwes': corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue (Industrial /Commercial) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -650 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CiTY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENKICE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -651 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO e LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C40. Set public hearing for January 6, 1988 - Approval to anrex Tract No. 13444, DR 85 -06 and OR 86 -39 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 34. RESOLUTION NO. 87-652 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 34 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -653 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION HO. 34 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUAIIT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 87-601 A RESOLUTION OF iME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANGNGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO .1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: :Y DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING y_ OBJECTIONS THERETO x MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 4 and 27. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Dis=sion of Item 4. Approval to authorize appropriation of $82,000 to Fund 12 (SB 325/Transportation) for a traffic signal on Foothill Boulevard at Turner Avenue. Councilmember Buquet asked that this item be pulled so he could state that he was glad this was happening. NOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Stout to approve Item 4. Motion carried enanimously 5 -0. Discussion of item 27. Approval of public cable acc ^ -ss consulting services with Telecommunications Management Corporation (TMC) (CO 87 -186) in the amount of $4,200 in support of a public, educational and government access management program with Chaffey Community College. Councilmember Wright asked where the funds were coming from for this. Mr. Lorimer, Sr. Administrative Assistant, explained this for Councilmember Wright. NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to approve Item 27. Motic.. carried unanimously 5 -0. D. CONSENT ORDINANCES Deputy City Clerk Adams read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 325, 326, 328 and 329. . �t ;t City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 9 1 w,uu,u, uun wrMm - a request to mange the iano use ana zoning uesignations from Me fum 4 -1 dwelling units per acre) and Medium„ -High (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) Residentiai to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for a 24.67 acre parcel within the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Land and Milliken Avenue - APN 202 - 211 -13 and 14. ORDINANCE NO. 325 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -02. REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LANG USE DESIGNATIONS FROM MEDIUM (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MEDIUM -HIGH (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 24.67 ACRE PARCEL WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA. PARK LAND AND MILLIKEN AVENUE - APN 202- 211 -13 E utrt4urntnu ,nu. - en appncanun tu amens tae ueve,o ent u,strict nap Trom Flood ontro an medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 65 acres of land, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenue - APN 201- 271-55. ORDINANCE NO. 326 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CHCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP, DDA 87 -07, FROM "FLOOD CONTROL" AND "MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL• (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 63.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND NAKE FINLINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 3. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 3 08 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND DDING (CHAPTER 3.08 RE NG T PURLH IN ORDINANCE HP 328 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING NEW CHAPTER 3.C8 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PURCHASING r.� City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 10 RESOLUTIOP. NO. 87-602 A RESOLUTION OF THL CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTA3LISHING THUSi PURCHASING POLICY AND AUTHORITY LIMITS PERTAINING TO THE PURCHASING PROCEDURES OF CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HUHI:IPAL CODE 4. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVFMTION - ORDINANCE 110. 329 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL vF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. AMENDING CHAPTER 19.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Nright to approve the Consent Ordinances as read. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. MOTION. Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve Resolution No. 87 -602. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGtI LS D SAFETY LIGHTING SIX LOC TIONS PR JECT - C Y OF RANCHO UL ONGA - The project locations are at Haven Avenue and C vic center Drive, Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, Base Line Road at Spruce Street, Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue. The proposed improvements consist of the installation of traffic signals and safety lighting. Mayor Stout opened the meeting the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -609 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND aAFETY LIGHTING AT SIX LOCATIONS BEING: HAVEN AVENUE AT JERSEY BOULEVARD, AT GIN STREET, AND AT CIVIC CENTER DRIVE; CARNELIAN STREET AT VINEYARD AVENUE AND AT RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE; BASE LINE ROAD AT SPRUCE AVENUE r d City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 11 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve Resolution No. 87 -509. motion carried unanimously 5 -0. t t f i f M 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENUMEN7 8/-ul - UtIr ur RANCHO CUC ONGA - n amendment to T t e o tae un ciga code pertaining to the definition -.f State mandated recycling facilities and the criteria for design, location and operation of such facilities. (Item continued from 10121/87) Staff report by Niki Dratt, Assistant Planner. Mayor Stout asked if the new shopping centers would have these facilities incorporated into them. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that this would be planned for in a new parking lot situation. Discussion took place a:. far as color, venting of these and screening for the facilities. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Stout did not feel every market should have those facilities. Deputy City Clerk A ms read the title of Ordinance No. 327. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -576 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCI'0 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 81 -01 ADDING SECTION 17.04.080 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PERTAINING TO STATE MANDATED RECYCLING CENTERS WITHIN COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE ZONES ORDINANCE NO. 327 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 17.04.080 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE REVIEW AMD ESTABLISHMENT OF RECYCLING FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 327 for November 18, 1987. Resolution No. 87 -576 should also come back at that time for approval. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. S� ;Q t' City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 12 7 Kmunu uuu,V inu - nn w u,su -,- r-- --_- Cucamonga ga OrRnance 211, to revise Section 17.12.040 pertaining to upgrade of parking allocation standards and to require enclosed garages for all apartment and condominium projects; and, to revise Section 17.08.090 pertaining to upgrade of General basign Guidelines for parking areas in multiple family development; and, to revisa Sectl,n 17.08.040 pertalning to upgrade of 4inimum residential unit size. Stall •Pport by Allen Warren, Associate Planner. A Councilmember Wright asked the difference in parking spaces for apartments, condos and townhouses. Mr. Warren stated there was no difference. Mayor Stout felt tha CUP should be more specific as to what they were looking for and wanted this added to the Ordinance, Mayuw Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Stout sated that units under 1,000 will not be allowed unless there is exceptional design so that it does not look like it is an easy exception to make. ORDINANCE NO. 211 -A (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87 -02, AMENDING SECTION 17.12.040 PERTAINING TO PARKING ALLOCATION STANDARDS AND ERCLOSED GAU..GES, SECTION 17.08.090 PERTAINING TO GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PARKING AREAS, AND SECTION 17.08.040 PERTAINING TO MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL UNIT SIZE OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ORDINANCE 110. 211 NOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by King to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 211 -A and set second reading for November 18, 1987 with recommended changes. Motion carried unaiimously 5 -0. This should be placed under advertised public hearings because of changes being made Instead of consent ordinances. .r City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 13 4,, a0 -Ming Section e10.44.130 Chapter nd MUNtotlthe LIGHTING 8o RancholECU0ea man9aChunicFpaAyCOOeLDy 10.44.140 authorizing the immobilization and /or removal of r adding a new Section vehicles from public streets and highways. parking CdefEnforcement Supervisor. Richard Alcorn, ANCHO CUCAMONGA. ks parking spaces. Staff report by ANNEXATION N0. 5 Councilmenber Brorm asked how _ertous this problem was. ip ACCEPTING THE i be Brad Buller, City Planner stated a survey had not been taken as to how many cut down on the amount of time sppent 10414 TO STREET vehicles this involve abut that these silt i AN0 t assist the Sheriff's Department. Councilmember Buquet added that this would to get these things Mr. Wasserman commented that this was ,lust another tool be taken care of without contacting the :pNCHO CUCpMONGA, ANNEXATION NO. taken care of faster because they could M �i. Sheriff's Department. week he handles. 13475T 42 -1, AND �5 Mr. Alcorn was asked approximately how man; of the se per He answered probably 2 per day. 175 13353 10414 AND T Mu I_ STRI I- opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Mayor Stout been I Lily Court in Victoria, who I,telytebuthreported of another Ray Sturman, case where it was taken care of immediately, is real pro blem. He asked the Council not RANCHO CULpNONGA, ANNEXATION N0. problem on Snapdragon where it a IN 1 AND ACCEPTING to take this lightly. -1, 13475, 13353, Hayor Stout closed the public hearing. ENANCE DISTRICT NO 3. Deputy city Clerk Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 330. ORDINANCE NO 330 (first reading) EiiBY T HE I ANNEXATIONHNo. 7 FINAL 44TOFCTHECRANLHOTCUCAMONGAFMUNICtPALULO AMENDIRNANCHAPOF AND ADDING A NEW SOFTVEHIC 4FRON EATING THE AUUTHORIZINGCTHEN IIMMOBILIZAT ON AND /OR REMOVAL ES FACILITIES AND HANDICAPPED 10414 PUBLIC STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, PARKING CITY EMPLOYEES 13353` AND PARKING SPACES, BY DESIGNATED Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance 18, 1987. Motion carried NOTION: 330 and set second reading for November No. unanimously 5 -0. « a « a + 4,, City Council Hinutes November 4, 1987 Page 15 RESOLUTION NO. 87-607 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 38 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 40. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FiNAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1, 13475, 13353, AND 10414 Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, gave staff report on the above annexations. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by King, secondad by Buquet to approve Resolution Nos. 87 -603, 604, 605, 606 and 607. No items submitted F. PUBLIC HEARINGS G. CITY 11ANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS G1. UPDATE ON MOBILE NOME RENT STABILIZATION - Progress report as to the development c t e ob a ome Park Acco� and other rent stabil zation options. staff report by Mark Lorimer, Sr. Administrative Assistant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Jack Williams, President of RCMORE and Rancho Cucamonga riobile home resident, gave history of the Accord and how it was established. He also stated the concerns of the mobile home park residents regarding the Accord, i.e., expenses that the mobile home park tenants are being asked to help pay for. Clay Hague, Western Mobile Home Association, stated he was reprerenting the owners in the Accord matter and stated their position. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Discussion took place between the Council and Mr. Hague with questions on his viewpoints. City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 16 Councilmember Buquet asked him why no one was pulling mobile home permits in the City of Ranch Cucamonga. Mr. Hague stated that 1) an owner would not want rent stabilization, 2) the land was so high priced, and 3) he had heard that Rancho Cucamonga did not want any more mobile home parks. Councilmember King made the comment that at the last meeting he sat in on with the owners and residents that he felt the owners were asking for a little too much. Councilmember Wright asked it we could go ahead and adopt Ordinance Mo. 245 and if there was any time limit as to when the second reading on this Ordinance had to be completed. Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated he would have to take a look at it. He felt that time was of the essence and that they should get going on establishing this Ordinance for adoption. Mr. Markman also stated he did not want the new Ordinance to have higher rates than what the owners were proposing. Harry Badum, Alta Laguna Mobile Home Park, made the statement that if the Accord ran out in December and if the owners raised the rents, it could not be effective for another 60 days, bringing the effective date March 1, 1988. Mayor stated the following options: 1. Continue negotiating for 2 more weeks Seek he PFP proporsl wh'CF coy" ` be app, .fed ror 2 mo -e neu%s n., ey herause it requires ayjr,.diture of funds. 3. Jim Markmtn, City attorney, suggested that instead of an RFP. '.n the sage 2 weeks we are continuing to negotiate, look for someone to do the -trd- and bring it back to Council so that if progress was not substartia, :ha) Lould move immediately on it. He indicated he would continue lo-,king ,t the Ordinances and start updating the legality of these provision,. The City Council agreed with the above option stated by Mr. HarWan. Mayor stout wanted this item to come back on the November 18, 1987 agenda. K V i ff", = i c City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Pace 13 8. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.4 o t e Ranc o Cucamon a Man c a Go e addlny a new Section 10 44.140 authorizing the obiliz tion Section and�/or�r4.130 and vehicles from Public streets and highways spaces. Staff report by Richard A1. parking facilities and Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor. Counctlmember Brown asked how serious this problem was, Srad Buller, City Planner stated a survey had not been taken as to how many, vehicles this involved, but that it would Cut down on the amount of time spent to take the necess >ry action on these situations, Councllmember Buquet added that this would assist the Sheriff,$ Department, Mr. Wasserman commented that this was ,lust another tool to taken care of faster because they could out contacting the Sherlff,s Department, get these things be taken care of with Mr. Alcorn was asked approximately how many of these per week he handles. He answered probably 2 per day, Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing, Addressing Council was: Ray Sturman, Lily Court in Victoria, who Indicated that there had been 1 case where it was taken care of immediately, but reported of another problem on Snapdragon where it is a real problem. He asked the Council not to take this lightly. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing, Deputy City Clerk Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 330. ORDINANCE NO. 330 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUKCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 10.44 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.44.130 AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 10,44.140 PUBL[CISTREETS HEAND HIGIINAYS,OpARK h/G AND/OR CUCAMONGA OVAL F VEHICLES FROM PARKING SPACES, BY DESIGNATED CITY EMPLOYEES AND HANDICAPPED Moo. 330 Moved set seco�ndereadain by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance unanimously S.D. 9 for November 18, 1987. Motion carried City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 14 9. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: A. ANNEXATION NO. 5 FOR PARCEL NAP 10384 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE STR C N . 6. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -603 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10884 8. ANNEXATION NO 23 FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1 13475 AND 10414 TO STREET :GH ING INTENANCE DISTRIC N 2. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -604 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 23 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1, 1 ?47S AND 10414 C. ANNEXATION NO. 32 FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1 13475 13353 10414 AND PARCEL MAP 10884-10 STREET L GHT NG INTEN NCE OI TRI TI T NO- RESOLUTION 110. 87{05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 32 TO STREET LIGHTING IUIINTEHANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1, 13475, 13353, 10414 AND PARCEL MAP 10884 0. ANNEXATION 110. 7 FOR DR 86 -21 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N RESOLUTION NO. 87-606 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR ;T NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 86 -21 E. ANNEXATION 110. 38 FOR TRACT NOS. 1354? -1, 13475. 13353. AND 10414 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 15 ` RESOLUTION NO. 87 -607 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 38 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE rIMAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13542 -1, 13475, 13353, AND 10414 Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, gave staff report on the above annexations. Mayor Stout openeu the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution Nos. 07 -603, 604, 605, 606 and 601. No items submitted f R 1 f R R F. PUBLIC HEARINGS R 1 R e R R G. CITY MAHAGER'S STAFF REPORTS Gl. UPDATE ON t10BILE HOME RENT STABILIZATION - Progress report as to the development o t e Mab a Home Park ccord and other rent stabilization options. Staff report by Mark Lorime -, Sr. Administrative Assistant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Jack Williams, President of RCMOAE and Rancho Cucamonga mobile home resident, gave history of the Accord and how it was established. He also stated the concerns of the mobile home park residents regarding the Accord, i.e., expenses that the mobile home park tenants are being asked to help pay for. Clay Hague, Western Mobile Home Association, stated he was representing the owners in the Accord matter and stated their position. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Discussion took place between the Council and Mr. Hague wltli questions on his viewpoints. City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 16 Councilmember Buquet asked him why no one was pulling mobile home permits in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. Hague stated that 1) an owner would not want rent stabilization, 2) the land was so high priced, and 3) he had heard that Rancho Cucamonga did not want any more mobile home parks. Councilmember KinC made the comment that at the last meeting he sat in on with the owners and residents that he felt the ormers were asking for a little too much. Councilmember Wright asked if we could go ahead and adopt Ordinance No. 245 and if there was any time limit as to when the second reading on this Ordinance had to be completed. Jim Msrkman, City Attorney, stated he would have to take a look at it. He felt that time was of the essence and that they should get going on establishing this Ordinance for adoption. Mr. Markman alco stated he did not want the new Ordinance to have higher rates than what the owners were proposing. Harry Badum, Alta Laguna Mobile Home Park, made the statement that if the Accord ran out in December and if the owners raised the rents, it could not be effective for another 60 days, bringing to effective date March 1, 1988. Mayor stated the following options: 1. Continue negotiating for 2 more weeks 2. Seek the RFP proposal which couldn't be approved for 2 more weeks anyway because it requires expenditure of funds. 3. Jim Markman, City Attorray, suggested that instead of an RFP, in the same 2 weeks we are continuing to negotiate, look for someone to do the study and bring it back to Council so that if progress was not substantial they could move immediately on 1t. He indicated he would continue looking at the Ordinances and start updating the legality of these provisions. The City Cuuncil agreed with the above opticn stated by Mr. Markman. Mayor stout wanted this item to come back on the November 18, 1987 agenda. a a a• a a , 1 d } City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 17 32. TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 TREE REMOVAL - CITATION - Review of proposed tree remove for a r adentio subdivision of s ng a family lots on 32.6 acres of land to the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avonua at Catalpa Street - APN 227- 071 -07, 11 and 20. Staff report by Scott Murphy, Associate Planner. Councilmember Buquet felt something should be done so that this matter does not keep coming up repeatedly. Councilmember Wright felt the development should be made around the trces. Mayor Stout did not feel that these particular tree were worth saving just to keep them in a tract. Councilmember Wright stated that the Planning Commission will approve a tract and the landscaping in spite of what the Ordinance says. Brad Bu „er, City Planner, stated this could be brought back at the next meeting with more information to givo an overview, go to the Advisory Commission for review and then back to the City Council with a report. Mayor Stout felt 4 healthy trees could be left as according to the Ordinance. Councilmembers Brown and Buquet concurred that 4 healthy trees could be left and that this issue should be addressed once and for all. Councilmember King agreed with Councilmember Wright's suggestion to build the development around them. lie couldn't see the point In leaving only 4 trees. Councilmember Wright wanted to abstain from this issue because she felt that to vote no would mean to leave the trees in the middle of the right of way and because she was not originally here when the first trees were originally approved. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve the tree removal permit as submitted. Motion carried 4 -0 -0 -1 (Wright abstained). •**•.*• Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:05 p.m. with all members of the Council present. • • 1 i 0 ! y4a i��y; City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 18 G3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -44 - APPEAL - INTRASTATE FINANCIAL - ppoa of the PT_ an.i ng Comm ss on s ec s an approv ng square foot bank building on 1.5 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive - APN 208 - 622 -36. Mayor Stout stated this had been a split decision of the F.anning Commission. Ne felt it looked like apartment parking and was also concerned with the material used on the bottom of the building. Bill Workentine, Costa Mesa Architect of the building, gyve background on the design of it. Dan Richardson, Architect, stated how he felt about the design of the building. Mayor Stout stated his concerns were the material on the bottom and the parking area design. Councilmember King thought it looked fine and that the City Council should not be getting so picky with regard to the building design. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright that the material on the bottom be changed and that the parking be enclosed tuck - under. The City Planner is to approve the color for the building. Notion carried 4 -1 (King voted no). G4. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE LAND USES FOR 1 85 ACRE SITE ADJACENT TO WINDROWS PARK. Staff report by Brad Buller, City P anner. Discussion took place on the traffic situation as far as weekday vs, weekend. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. A.ddressing the Council were: Jim Bailey, William Lyon Company, explained why h2 felt this design should be a daycare center. Dee Maloney, Vice President of La Petite Academy, explained why she felt the daycare center should be allowed. She also offered a portion of their property to the City to do with what they wanted. She said she would make their center available for Scout meetings or whatever, but she just wanted to know from the residents what the, wanted to use it for as long as it did not interfere with the preschool use. Ms. Maloney also indicated they would like to form a committee of Victoria residents to inform them of their concerns. City Council Minutes November, 4, 1987 Page 19 Councilmember Wright asked if they would be competitive with the schools Who let groups use their facilities for a fee. Ms. Maloney said they are not there to make money on the groups that rould use their facility. Mayor Stout asked how hard it would be to bring back an Ordinance which would require a CUP for these types of uses In the Victoria Planned Community. Mr. Markman stated that was a good idea and that it should be done. Phil Henderson, President of ACTIVE, stated they would like to be more involved in the eesign making process of the community. Harmon Angelo, Victoria resident, submitted a petition from the Victoria residents asking the William Lyon company and /or the City to conduct a traffic study. He also felt that when they bought their homes they were given incorrect information as to what was going to at that location. He felt this particular site should be a church. Susan Jebia, Victoria resident, stated she opposed the daycare center. She felt the daycare center should go at another site within Victoria. Sandra Kaiser, 12363 Dove Tuck Drive, stated she is against the daycare center and felt this site should be turned into parking for the Windrows Park. Doug Lyon, Victoria resident, stated he is against the daycare center. He also stated he was expecting that particular site to have a church. Andy Soiarzano, 12813 Coriander Court, stated he 1s against the daycare center. Rny Sturman, Victoria resident, felt the daycare center should be in the middle of Victoria. Jim Bailey, William Lyon Company, addressed the issues that were raised by the Victoria residents. Councilmember King did not feel this was a community facility. Councilmember Wright felt it was a commercial operation in the middle of a residential neighburhood. Councilmevber Drown felt that traffic was a rerl problem around the daycare center. She did feel teat La Petite was doing what they felt was best. ■ _1 City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 20 e1. ACTION: Staff to immediately go back and change the Ordinance which would S- require a CUP on certain uses. La Petite can go ahead with their protect if the change in this Ordinance has not occurred. The City Attorney is to research the Y Planning Commission minutes to see if this is an actual legal use. Approved #T 5 -0. II. COUNCIL BUSINESS e H1. Discussion of setting workshop dates for Rancho Cucamonga 2000 project (goals). V • Councilmember Wright stated she did not want her name on her list of goals. Mr. Wasserman stated that only staff world see them. Mayor Stout said he would like to see a list of all of the goals. ACTION: November 18, 1987 was set for the date of the goals workshop. r + + « « + H2. Magnetic-Levitation Train Terminal - Discussion of a resolution requesting t' county Board of 5upery sore to a apt a resolution requiring the approval of any affected city prior to the location of a Magnetic - Levitation Train Terminal. RESOLUTION NO. 87-608 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF ANY AFFECTED CITY PRIOR TO THE LOCATION OF A MAGNETIC- LEVITATION TRAIN TERMINAL NATION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 87 -608. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 1. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Councilmember Wright asked why the lights are on at the parks if there are no games tatting place, specifically at Red Hill Pc•k. Mr. Wasserman stated he would send a letter to the leageas Lo take care of this problem. City Council Minutes November 4, 1987 Page 21 J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC P i No cemeunicatien was made from the public. K. ADJOURNWKT ` MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Meeting adjourned at 12:55 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Adams Deputy City Clerk Appi-ved: ti I'- t r Y December 2, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday. December 2, 1987, in the Lions Park. Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:91 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet I1, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Hanagnr, Lauren M. Wasserman, Assistant City Manager, Robert Rizzo; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; City Attorney, James Markman; City Planner, Brad Buller; City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Administrative Services Director, Jim Hart; Sr. Administrative Assistant, Mark Lorimer; Assessment Revenue Coordinator, J 'Y Fulwood. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS B1. Councilman Buquet presented a report from the SANBAG meeting held earlier that day. He stated that the SANBAG board has begun efforts to revive Measure A and hopefully place the measure on the November 1988 ballot. 58498 pertains to the creation of a social services transportation advisory council. The legislation becomes effective July 1, 1988 and each commission has been asked to have its advisory council membership appointed prior to February 4, 1988. Regarding the clean air act, he stated Supervl:or Jon Mikels had attended a congressional briefing in Washington, D.C. Sponsors of the briefing agreed on a six point frame work for a re- authorized clean air act to control ozone and carbon monoxide, which included regular reductions, deadlines, more local authority in determining our own program, sanctions in failure to meet a deadline of twenty years, and support of control for indirect sources. He also announced the City Selection Committee had selected a representative under the 53151 provisions. The committee had appointed Carole Beswick, the newly elected Mayor to the City of Redlands. Mr. Buquet requested that staff prepare something for Faye Dastrup who had held this position for five years for her services. City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 2 C. CONSENT CALENDAR Cl. Approval of Minutes: September 16, 1987 and October 21, 1987. C2. Approval of Warrants, Pegister No's. 11/18/87 and 11/25/87 and Payroll ending 11/12187 for the total amount of $1,039,561.06. C3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 1987. C4. Alcuholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer d Wine Eating Place, China Star, Inc., Lin, Ching -Hsi, 9638 Base Line Road. C5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer d Wine Eating Place, The City Deli, Bill C. Underwood, 9135 Archibald Ave., Unit F. C6. Alcoholic [leverage Application for On Sale General Eating Place, El Rancho Grande, Freide L. 6 Richard P. Wilkins, 9893 Highland Avenue. C7. Approval to enter into an agreement (CO 87 -197) for Janitorial /custodial services with American Building Maintenance Company for offices located at 9320, 9330, 9340, 9360 Base Line Road; the Neighborhood Center, Lions Park Community Center, Heritage Park building, and offices at the Corporate Yard, for a cost of $2,341.08 per month with additional services to be performed at a cost of $8.50 /hr., effective December 1, 1987. Additional services are those that are outside of the normal contract, i.e., painting, plumbing and electrical work. C8. Approval to receive and accept the fiscal year 1986 -87 City Audit as presented by City Independent auditors Lance, Solt and Lunghard. C9. Approval of reimbursement agreement (CO 87 -198) between the Alta Loma Channel Capital Improvement Fund and the Reserve Fund in the amount of $65,000. CIO. Approval of reimbursement agreement (CO 87 -199) between the Victoria Landscape District No. 2 and Engineering's Beautification Fund No. 21 in the amount of $300,000. ClI. Approval to seek requests for proposal to select a landscape architectural firm to develop working drawings for the construction of Cucamonga Creekside Park. C12. Approval of sole source lease purchase of FMC Sweeper from Kern Equipment Co., in the amount of $106,511.15 to be paid in five (5) annual payments of $21,302.23 each. City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 3 .'3 A• roval and execution of a 3 -Party agreem ?nt (CO 87 -199) between the Chafi:y oJint Union High School District, The Wiiliam Lyon Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for certain off -site street dedications and improvements for Rancho Cucamonga High School to be located at tha northwest corner to Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue and authorizing the 14,yor to sign the same. C14. Approval of Disaster Preparedness Budget including appropriation of $34,915.00 from unallocated reserves. CIS. Approval to release a portion of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for undergrounding of overhead utilities for Lots 4 and 5 of Parcel Map 10543 located at Jersey Boulevard and ;ed Oak Street, submitted by Arrow Rancho Cucamonga Limited, a California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -634 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A PORTION OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM ARROW RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LIMITED, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C16. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -188) for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at Civic Center Drive Improvcment Project awarded to Hovey Electric, Inc. for the amount of $70,762.00 to be funded from TDA, Article 8, funds. C17. Approval to award the bid for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at Sixth Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, and Baseline Road at Spruce Street Improvement Project to Hovey Electric for the amount of $215,984.00 to be funded from TDA, Article 8, funds. C18. Approval to award the bid for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue and Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive Improvement Project to Moore Electrical Contracting for the amount of $1339777.00 to be funded from TDA, Article 8, funds. C19. Approval to award the bid for the Vineyard Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement Project between Arrow Highway and Foothill Boulevard to Fontana Paving, Incorporated for the amount of $104,892.60 to be funded from Systems Development fund. C20. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -201) for the Ramona Avenue Reconstruction Improvement Project between Victoria and 19th Streets awarded to Inland Constructors for the amount of $85.670.60 to be funded from Systems Development Funds. I City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 4 Y C21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10277, located on north of Almond Street, east of Carnellan Street, submitted by The Bdmakian Company. RESOLUTION NO. 87.635 A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10277 C22. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 to C.O. 86 -131 with Williamson and Scho!d for Victoria Basin Drainage Study for an amount not to exceed $6,288.00 to be paid from Drainage Facilities Fund for Etiwanda. C23. Approval of the concept for the proposed alignment fai Hillside Road between Amethyst Avenue and Klusman Avenue and direct staff to prepare a General Plan Circulation Element Amendment. Councilman King requested item be removed for discussion. C24. Apprivel of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10210 - Almond Intercept Channel, located on Almond Street at Sapphire Street, submitted by Forecast Corporation. RESOLUTION N0. 87{36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 1RACT 10210 - ALMOND INTERCEPT CHANNEL C25. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10210, located on Almond Street at Sapphire Street, submitted by Forecast Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 87.637 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10210 C26. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 87 -22 located on the east side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Messenger Anita Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 87.638 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRFEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -22 Y City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 5 C27. Approval of Drainage Acceptance Agreement (CO 87 -202) for Parcel Map 9972 (OR 86 -13) located northerly Jr Ninth Street, easterly of Vineyard Avenue, submitted by Anthony D. Lucas, Nellie K. Lucas, and First Trust Bank, trustee under the Leon F. Lucas revocable trust agreement. C28. Approval of Parcel Map 10902 located at Fairmont Way and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 87-639 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10902 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10902) C29. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 87 -203) with ASL Consulting Engineers to prepare plans, specifications and estimates for 19th Street and Haven Avenue Intersection, the maximum fee is $15,918.00 plus utility exploration costs, if high pressure gas Hoes exist and suggestion to do so by utility company. To be funded from Systems Development Fund. C30. Approval of Agreement (CO 87 -2D4) for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Maurice Kandel and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9480 19th Street, located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -640 A RESOLUTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC414OHGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM MAURICE KANDEL, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME C31. Approval of Agreement (CO 87 -205) for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Julia P. Mariscal and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvement at 9832 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -641 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JULIA P. MARISCAL, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE x r City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 6 C32. Approval of Agreement (CO 87 -205) for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication botween Shirley A. Jovtr, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9892 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner. RESOLUTION NO. 67 -642 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A'+ AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROrE%ZNT AND DEDICATION FROM SHIRLEY A. JOVIN, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 03. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 86 -39 located on the northwest corner of Helms Avenue and Ninth St -eet, submitted by Louts M. Barnes. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -643 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, .APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -39 C34. Approval of designation of Rancho Cucamonga in local telephone directory. Joanne Johnson from the audience requested item be removed for discussion. C35. Approval to release bond in the amount of $2,500 for conversion of model home office to original garage for Tract No. 12237 -2. C36 Approval to accept Improvements. Release of Bonds and file a Notice of Completion for: Parcel M'aR 9896 - located between Milliken Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue and between '4Fh-a-R 6th Streets. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $155,000 Faithful Performance Bond (Landscape) $140,000 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -644 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCCL HAP 9896 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Parcel Ma 9�687 - located on the North East Corner of Santa Anita Street an 4td h Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ ;21000.00 City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 87-645 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHL CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9587 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CUP 85 -37 - located on west side of Haven Avenue north of Foothill sou and Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $109,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 87-646 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 85 -37 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Parcel Na 8816 - located on the west of Beryl Street south of 19th Street ER nort of Base Line Road Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 7,546.00 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -647 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 8815 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C37 Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond fo Tract 11915 - located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 18,800.00 C38. Set public hearing for January 6, 1988 - Approval to annex DR 85 -06 (pcl. 3, PM 8345) located on the north side of Arrow Route west of Haven Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 41. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -648 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 41 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 D City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 9:ge 8 RESOLUTION 110. 87-649 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDESSESSMET ANNEXATION CTO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT t10. 1, AM DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS AHHEXATIOtI HE A S LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT 70 THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THFRETO C39. Set public hearing for January S. 1988 - Approval to annex DR 86 -39 Landscape Maintenance thStct Loa 3 as Annexation NO- ln„strial /Coawnrctal) to RESOLUTION 40. 87 -650 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' FORIAHMEXATIO14 NO. 11 TO LRAM SCAPEY ENGINEER'S MAITENANCE DISTRICT NO R3PORT RESOLUTION HO. 87 -651 A RESOLUTION ECLARINGT115 COUNCIL TENTION TO CITY ORDERFTHE RANCHO ANNEXATIBMGTO CALIFORNIA, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRIC DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION HE A S LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSOANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIOBJECTIONS HTING CT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HE 04085 -t publi DRearing (variousrlocettons throughout the xCity)t to Street roval to Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No 34. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -652 A RESOLUTION OF 111E CITY COUNCIL OF RE CITY OF RANCHO CUCASOHGA- CALIFOIA ANNEXATION�MOF 34E STREET FOR RESOLUTION N0. 87 -653 A RESOLUTION OF THE OF CALIFORNIA, ITS COUNCIL H 0 CHO TO DISTRICT 1 DESIGNATING SA DNCANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NOa534THE TO STREET INTENANCE LANDSCAPING LIGHTING LIG TING ACT OFR1972 AND OFFERING ATTIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO g City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 9 C41. Set public hearing for January 6, 1988 - Approval to Annex OR 66 -39 northwest corner or 9th Street and Helms Avenue ( Industrial /Commercial) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 7. RESOL�.ION NO. 87 -654 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STkEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 87-655 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER Ti1F. ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1572 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C42. Set public hearing for January 6, 1988 - Approval of a Resolution passing on reapportionment report for Parcel Map 10008 within the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82 -IR), and giving preliminary approval. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -656 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10008. GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 6, 1988 C43. Set public hearing for January 6. 1988 - Approval of a Resolution passing on reapportionment report for Tract Hap 13118 within the Storm Drain Channel Assessment District (86 -2), and giving preliminary approval. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -657 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT FOR TRACT MAP 13118, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 6, 1988 City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 10 C44. Set public hearing for January 6, 1988 - Approval of a Resolution passing on reapportionment report for Parcel Map 10543 within the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82 -10), and giving preliminary approval. RESOLUTION NO. 87.658 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. PASSING ON REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT FOR PARCEL NAP 10543, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SEirING THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 6, 1988 MOTIGN: Moved by Buquct, seconded by King to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar with Items 23 and 34 removed for discussion. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Discussion of Consent Calendar Item 23. C23. Approval of the concept for the proposed alignment for Hillside Road between Amethyst Avenue and Klusman Avenue and direct staff to prepare a General Plan Circulation Element Amendment. Mr. Wasserman stated this Item was something which Council had requested. Councilman King asked if there had been notification sent to the public. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, stated this wasn't a public hearing. We were only approving this in concept. We would be coming back at a later time for the public hearing and the public would be notified at that time. Councilman King stated he had some concerns. He did not feel there was anything unsafe at this intersection in terms of the ,log. He felt curbs created more problems for the traffic and more accidents. He felt it would be better, in his opinion, to keep the configuration as it now existed. He did not see any need to approve this in concept. Councilman Buquet stated he had supported this study at the time we were trying to make this a safer through street. Ile felt the concept would be a safer circumstance. Councilwoman Wright felt strongly about the issue and that we should proceed. Mayor Stout also felt we should go ahead with the consideration of the general plan amendment. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve Consent Calendar Item 23. Motion carried 4 -1 -0. (King no.) 1 :,:r I City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Pago 11 tknf•s Discussion of Consent Calendar Item 34. C34. Approval of designation of Rancho Cucamonga in local telephone directory. Mr. Wasserman stated the staff report was before Council. Information not available at the time the staff report was written was that If anyone in the future wanted to change back to the community designation, it would cost $15 for an individual and $30 fo• a eorporetion. Councilman Ouquet asked if there would be a way to cross - reference Rancho Cucamonga with the community designation. If not, then we would have the same situation only to reverse. Mayor Stout announced that Council had received two letters in ravor of the change; one from the Chamber of COmm:zrce and one from Jeffery Sceranka. Mayor Stout openad the meeting for those who wished to address the item. Addressing Council were: Joanne Johnson who presented a petition against the change. Diane Williams, 7251 Amethyst, who spoke in favor of the chanrq. Hal Overton, a representative from General Telephone, stated that when the directory is changed to reflect Rancho Cucamonga, there would be no way to respond to questions for the individual community. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquot to approve Consent Calendar Item 34. Motion carried 4 -1 -0. (Wright no). Councilwoman Wright stated she believed it was in the best Interest to have listings under the City name, but she felt that General Telephone was creating a problem when they would not cross - reference. Therefore, she voted no. D. CONSENT ORDINANCES 01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 87 -01 - BCE OFYELO� Review of a Duve opaent greement fora comaer[ a es gn center and LOL consisting of 10 buildings totaling 144,950 square feet located on the Ood side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN 208- 351 -28. City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet, read the title of Ordinance No. 331. City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 12 OROIRA.NCE NO. 331 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPR04ING THE 13CUHENT ENTITLEO 'DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT C014CERNING THAT PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SPRUCE AVENUE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA' AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CIT' CLERK TO EXECUTE THE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA MOTION: loved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to Naive full reading of the Consent Ordinances and to approve the Consent Ordinances. Notion carried 4 -1 -0. (King no.) f f f f f t E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS E1. ORDERING THE WORK IN COHNFCTIOH WITH: A. ANNEXATION NO. 39 FOR WEST 5101 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -659 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 39 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR HELLMAN AVENUE PARKWAY FOR TRACT NO. 12238 B. ANNEXAT1011 N0. 9 70R DR 86-42 LOCATED OH THE NORTH SIDE OF PRROW OUTE BE NHIt- OAK AND PLE DRIVE INDUSTRIAL /LOHMERLI L TO LANDSLAPE MAIMTENA116E DISTRICT N0. 3. Staff report under A. RESOLUTION NO. 87-660 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 9 'r0 LANDSCAPE HAINTEN&ICE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 86 -42 MOTION: Moved by King, secon'cd by Brown to approve Resolution Nos. 87 -659 and 87 -660. Motion carried 4 -0 -1. ( Buquet had left the Council table) i ..r= None Submitted. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS f f f f t f G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS City Council Minutes December 2, 1987 Page 13 G1. RECOAMENDATION RE: OPERATION OF SHERIFF'S STATION Oil 24 HOUR BASIS. Staff report by Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager. .. Also addressing Council was: Captain Eugene Gilmore who presented an alternate plan to the one tnat had been submitted with the agenda packet. The alternate plan called for Transcriber Clerk II's instead of Public Information Clerks. Captain Gilmore stated that a PIC had limited fob responsibilities while a transcriber clerk could do additional duties such as typing reports, etc. 'i Which would be more beneficial to the Sheriff's Department. NOTION: Moved by Buqet, seconded by Brown to approve operating the Sheriff's Station on a 24 -hour basis according to the alternate plan using Transcriber Clerk II's. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. G2. AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY TO PARTILIPATE IN 800 MHz RADIO FREQUENCY FEAS IB [L YSTUDY. Staff report presented by Lauren M. Wasserman, C ty Nanager. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to authorize the participation in the study. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. f f f f# f MOTIOA: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve the reimbursement and consulting agreements. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. # R f f f Cityf Council Minutes December 16, 1981 Page 14 G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS G1. MOBILE HUME RENT STABILIZATION - Consideration of an agreement, the Rancho Cucamonga Mobile Home Par Accord, between the City of Cancho Cucamonga and all mobile home park owners perLaining to rent stabilization in mobile home parks. Staff report by Mark Lorimer, Senior Administrative assistant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Jack Williams, Chairman of RCMORE, encouraged Council to approve the accord. Ile went into details of the process that was used to bring about the compromises from both the park owners and residents for this accord. Bill Schweinfurth, 0lrectur of Operations for the Alta Laguna Mobile Home Park Association, also encouraged approval of the Accord. Therc being no further response frum the public, Mayor Stout closed the public discussion. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve the accord and direct staff to forward It to the owners for signing. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. G2. Lity tngineer. Mr. Maguire presented some slides showing the various Problems along the north side of Foothill Blvd Council directed an inquiry to staff as to when the RDA could become the source of funding for such improvements. Mr. Wasserman stated he didn't know b-it it certainly would be worth looking into. Counciiman Buquet expressed that he felt the feeding sho -ld come from the RDA. Councilwoman Wright asked if Council could get an idea of what the entire project would cost if we decided to do the work ourselves. Councilwoman Brown concurred she would like to see what the problems were and what the cost of the entire area was first, then we could prioritize them. She still, however, had a problem in setting a precedent. r i I December 16, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG'A CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council �f the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, December 16, 1987, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Lire Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The mneting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Dennis 1. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: Decorah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet 1., Jeffrey King, Pamela 1. Wright, ind Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Robert Rizzo; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; City Attorney, James Marloan; Senior Administrative Assistant, Mark Lorimer; Associate Planner, Debra Meier; City Engineer, Russell Maguire; City Planner, Brad Buller. x x x x r x B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS B1. City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; requested item C7 be removed from the consent calendar to come back at a later time. Also on item C33, the dollar amount should be $28,000 instead of the $24,800. x x x x x x C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Approval of Minutes: October 7, 1987 and November 18, 1987. C2. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 12/2/87 and 12/1/87 and Payroll ending 11/25/87 and 12/10/87 for the total amount of $3,457.343.15. C3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Eating Place, New Friend Chinese Restaurant, Michael d Philip Lao, 7890 Haven Avenue, Units 15 and 16. C4. Approval to amend Resident Inspector Conr ^act (CO 87 -133) to increase amount of field order change approval. C5. Approval to authorize staff to approve change order requests (CO 87 -17J) for the Civic Center and Public Safety facility project consistent with the procedures of present public works contracts policy. C6. Approval to authorize the transfer of remaining appropriations from the Special Assessment Districts to the General Fund. City Council Minutes December 16, 1987 Page 2 C7. Approval to designate Brigft Tate, Risk Management Technician, as alternate representative on the board of Directors of toe California Municipal Insurance Authority. (Item removed.) RESOLUT104 NO. 87 -661 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF rHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CESIGNATING AN ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE ON THE DOPJUD OF DIRECTORS, OF THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY C8. Agreement with Southern California Gas Company authorizing Mayor to sign franchise fee agreements on behalf of City. C9. Approval to receive and file letters from Rancho Disposal, Yukon Disposal, and Western Waste requesting annual rate review be deferred until such time as San Bernardino County adjusts the solid waste landfill site fees. CIO. Approval to upgrade Junior Programmer and Programmer /Operator positions within the Management Information Service area to programmer level position and setting the salary range code steps at 387 -437 ($2,387 - $3,063 monthly). Funding will be from account 33- 4130 -1100 (kesource Center Regular Payroll), and will have no impact on 1987 -80 budget allocati m for this activity. C11. Approval to authorize the City of Rancho Cucamonga to Redeem Bonds, Publish and mail Notice of Redemption for Surplus Funds within The Storm Drain Channel (86 -2) for approximately $95,000. C12. Approval of Parcel Map 10617 located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, submitted by BCE Development. RESOLUTION NO. 87662 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10617 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10617) C13 Approval to allocate available fund balance ($147,914) in SB -300 for slurry seal programs. C14. Approval of partial release of a portion of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for lots B. 9, 10, 11 of Parcel Map 6725, located south of Foothill Doulev3rd north of Arrow Highway, between Red Oak Street and Elm Avenue, submitted by BCE Development. City Council Minutes December 16, 1987 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -663 A RESOLUTION OF THE ^Z1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR A PARTIAL RELEASE OF A PORTION OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DOE DEVELOPMENT CIS. Approval of the Envlronmtntal Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Slurry Seal Program 1987 -88 (P4ase I) for various City streets and approval of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION 110. 87 -664 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED SLORRY SEAL PROGRAM 1987 -88 (PHASE I) FOR VARIOUS CITY STREETS C16. Approval of Maps, Agreements for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tracts 13440, 13441, 13442, and 13445 located in the Victoria Planned Community, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 87-665 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF rHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13440, 13441, 13442, AND 13445 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -666 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhuNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENTS WITH THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NOS. 13440, 13441, 13442 AND 13445 C17. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -216) for the Vineyard Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement project located between Arrow Route and Fonthill Boulevard, awarded to Fontana Paving, Incorporated for the amount of $104,892.60 to be funded from Systems Development Fund. C18. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -217) for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue, and Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive Improvement Project, awarded to Moore Electric contracting for the amount of ;133,771.00 to be funded from TOA, Article 8 funds. xY City Council Minutes December 16, 19£7 Page 4 C19. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -218) for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line road at Spruce Street Improvement Project, awarded to Hovey Electric, Incorporated for the amount of $215,984.00 to be funded from TDA, Article 8 funds. C20. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for: i OR 84 -18 - located on the east site of Archibald Avenue, south of 7th Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 73,981 RESOLUTION H0. 87.667 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE P118LIC IMPRUiEMENTS FOR DR 84 -18 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK OR 85 -10 - located between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue south of Gilson 7venue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 60,000 RESOLUTION NO. 87.668 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC I*RDVEMENTS FOR OR 85 -10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK OR 86 -19 - located on the Utica Avenua south of Jersey Boulevard. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $146,000 RESOLUTION NO. 87.569 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 86 -19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR 86 -21 - located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ B4OCO P. 1 I City Council Minutes December 16, 1987 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 87670 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 86 -21 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR 80 -48 - lotatea on the Northeast corner of Utica Avenue and 6th Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 7,500 RESOLUTION NO. 87671 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 84 -48 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CUP 85 -01 - located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 66,000 RESOLUTION NO. 87672 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 85 -01 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 12184 - located on the east side of Beryl Street south of Base Line Road. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $267,300 RESOLUTION NO. 87673 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12184 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C21. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for: Tract 12801 -1 - located on the south side of Banyan Street west of Beryl Street. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 18,800 City Council Minutes December 16, .987 Page 6 Trart 12721 - located en the east side of Vineyard Avenue south of Fonthill goeV�— Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) s 5,100 C2 ?. Approval of lmpruvewnt Agreemert and Improvement Security for MDR 87 -40 located on the east side of Beryl Street between Base Line Road and 19th Street, submitted by Michael Pfannenstiel, RESOLUTION NO. 87 -674 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MIIAR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -40 C2d. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 86 -14 located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Arrow Route and Civic Center Drive, submitted by Havr:n Investors I. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -675 A RESOLUTIUN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -14 C24. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for street improvements on Haven Avenue, between Church Street and Base Line Road, submitted by Lewis Homes of California, a General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 87-676 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD C25. Approval of Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 87 -219) from Brad R. Hastings, for a single family residence, located on the east side of Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Road. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -677 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM BRAD R. HASTINGS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME I City Council Minutes December 16. 1987 Page 7 C26. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 87 -13) with Wilson - Sheenan and Associate• for the additional scope of work for Amethyst Street -19th Street Improvement Project to provide storm drain plans, specifications and estimates :ct Included in the original scope of work. The amount not to exceed $10,124.CO, will oring the contract total to $24,532.00 to be funded from Systems Development Fund. C27. Approvai to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 86 -46) for Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments (construction drawings) with Forma for an additional fee of Five Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars ($5,260.00) being paid from Beautification Funds. C28. Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication (CO 87 -227) between Julia M. Priego and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9824 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turne•. RESOLUTION HO. 87-678 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JULIA M. PRIEGO, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME C29. Approval of a Drainage Acceptance Agreement (CO 87 -220), Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 87 -221) and Improvement Agraement and Improvement Security for DR 87 -09 located on the southw:st corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Schlosser Forge Company and Phillip D.. Elaine M., Jeffrey P. and Jacqueline L. Schlosser and Alpert M. and Roberta J. Holquin. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -679 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM PHILIP D., ELAINE M., JEFFREY P. AND JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER AND ALBERT W. AND ROBERTA J. HOLQUIN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE RESOLUTION NO. 87.680 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT AND AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -09 .r-T City Council Minutes December 16, 1987 Page 8 C30. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 87 -222) with Inland Planning Group, d.b.a. Planning Network, for the Development and Prep..ration of the Technical Update to the Environmental Impact Report for the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The maximum fee is $22,007 to be funded from Community Services /Planning Contract Services fund. C31. Approval of the Professionai Services Agreement (CO 87 -223) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and La Belle - Marvin, Incorporated, for Soils Investigation and Pavement Evaluaticn and Analysis for Haven Avenue between the North and South City Limits and for Fourth Street (westbound lanes only) between the East and Hest City Limits. The not -to- exceed fee of $15,672.07 will be funded by System Development. C32. Approval of the Professional Services , City of Rancho Cucamonga and DeLeuw. Cather a for the preparation of Preliminary Engineer railroad crossing improvements throughou preparation of Public Utilities Commission I Improvement Funding under the Federal Highway for the preparation of design plans, contract estimate for said crossings as outlined on t Services. The not -tn- exceed fee of $109, Development. eem,)nt (CO 87 -224) between the Company, Engineers and Planners 1 Studies for various proposed the City and the associated leations for Railroad Crossing fety Act, Section 203 Funds and !cifications and engineer's cost attached Exhibit 'A', Scope of .00 will be funded by Systems C33. Approval of the Professional Services Agreement (CO 87 -225) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ASL Consulting Engineers for the preparation of design plans, contract specifications and engineer's estimate on the Hellman Avenue Storm Drain from Monte Vista Street to the Cucamonga Creek south of Base Line Road. The not -to- exceed fee of $26,800.00 will be funded from Drainage Fees. C34. Approval to award and execute Professional Service Agreement (CO 87 -226) for the inventory and condition analysis of the City's drainage facilities to Don Greek and Associates, for the amount of $78,000 to be funded from Drainage Funds. C35. Approval to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids' for the Etiwanda Avenue Cobble Curb and Gutter Improvement Project located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue from victoria Avenue to 263 feet north of Victoria Avenue, and on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue from 10 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing to 280 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing. r City Council Minutes December 16, 1987 Page 9 , RESOLUTION NO. 87{81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'ETIWANDA AVENUE COBBLE CURB A4D GUTTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PHASE I', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING, THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C36. Set public hearing for January 20, 1987 - Approval of intent to vacate a portion of the non- vehicular access rights, as dedicated en Poicel Map 6725, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard bzt:een Spruce and Elm Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 87-68? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE NON- VEHICULAR, ACCESS RIGHTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. (Item C7 removed and dollar aqount changed to $28,000 in Item C33.) Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. None submitted. D. CONSENT ORDINANCES E. ,ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN .164ENDMENT 87 -03 - OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Victoria Co®un ty Pan Te require aCon� Conditional Use permit for certain community facil'ties as spec In the Commercial Standards and Community Facility sections of the Vic Community Plan. Staff report by Debra Meter. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Doug Lion, 12477 Ironbar Road, representing ACTIVE. Mr. Lion stated they were in disagreement with the ordinance if it would grandfather La Petite Nursery in. He expressed that they felt the ordinance should be reworded on page 7. It would be in the best interest of the City to obtain a CUP for this project. There being no further response from the public, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. b' City Council Minutes December 16, 1997 Page 10 Councilman Buqu ?t also expressed that he felt this should be under a CUP. Councilwoman Brown stated that even if we went under CUP, we could not get them to do the conres -lens which they had promised. ORDINANCE N0. 332 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AIIENDHENT 87 -03, TO MODIFY THE CONMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES AS SPECIFIED IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARD'S AND COMMUNITY FACILITY SECTIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to delete the grandfather clause, waive full reading of Ordinance No. 33 and and sct second reading for January 6, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. E2 Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing, there being no response the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 87.68: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF NON- VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGhTS ON HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 87 -683 ordering the vacation of a portion of the non - vehicular access rights as dedicated on parcel map 6617. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -04B - WEIRICK PROPERTIES - request to arena t e Lan Use E event o t e Genera P a—i—n from fb7T to Neighborhood Commercial for 3.58 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APH 202- 151 -33. City Council Minutes December 16, 1987 Page 11 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -574 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AMENDMENT NO. 87 -04B REQUESTING A ChANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD CONMERCIAL FOR 3.58 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 202 - 151 -33 i- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -03 - WEIRICN PROPERTIES - A request to amend the Development District map from 'OP" ff ce Professional) to 'NCO (Neighborhood Commerc'al) for 3.58 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APN 202- 151 -33. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -575 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 07 -03, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.58 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 202 - 151 -33 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to continue the item to February 17. 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. •*•k.• E4. ORDERING THE WORK TN CONNECTION WITH: A brief staff report presented by Lauren .Wasserman, t, 1N Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. A. ANNEXATION NO. 40 FOR TRACT NO_ 12873 rnra7Fn AN TNr racT crnr nu RESOLUTION NO. 87 -684 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RARCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO 40 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 12873 City Council Minutes December 16, 1987 Page 12 8. ANNEXATION fi0. 10 FOR OR 87 -22. CUP 85 -37 (PLC 3 OF PM 9487) TO LANDSC PE MA NTEN I D STRICT NO. 3 C. 0. RESOLUTION NP 87-685 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA, CALIFORNIA, ORUF.RING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 40. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 A4D ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -22, AND CUP 85 -37 (PCL 3 OF PM 9487) RESOLUTION NO. 87 -686 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN QINNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 33 TO STREET LIGHTING KAINTENANCE LISTRICT M0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -22, DR 86 -42 CUP 8' °7 (PCL 3 OF PH 9487), TRACT NOS. 12873, 13279 AMC 13443 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -687 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WOR.. IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 24 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 12373 E. ANNEXATION N0. 6 FOR_ TRACT NOS. 13279 AND 13443 (ViCTO ^TA) TO STREET LIGHTING MA INT NANCE DISTRICT NO. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -688 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONHEC110N WITH ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAIKTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13279 AND 0443 F. IUINEXATION N0. 6 FOR OR 87 -22 DR 86 -42 CUP 85 -37 (PCL 3 OF PH 9487) TO STREET LIGH ING NAI NTEN NC D1STR CT N0. 6. r City Council Minutes December 16, 1987 Page 13 RESOLUTION NO. 87-689 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 110. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -22, DR 86 -42, CUP 85 -37 (PC'- 3 OF PM 9487) MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution Nos. 87 -664, 87- 685, 87 -686, 87 -687, 87 -688, 87 -689. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to continue items F1 and F2 to January 6, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. F1. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HLLLKAN AVENUE - at t e property located at 9549 Rober s Court N 202 - 161 -09 for the construction of street Improvements across the Base Line Road frontage of said property. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -690 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CnCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIII REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF r2. BASE LINE WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HELLMAN AVENUE- public hearing for the Durpose of hearing and passing upon objections or protests, if any, which may be raised by any property owner or other Interested party regarding the notice of public hearing and order to construct that was posted on December 1. 1987, at 9549 Roberds Court in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -691 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPRCIEMENTS AT 9549 ROBERDS COURT (APN 202 - 161 -09) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS A40 HIGHWAYS, SECTIONS 5870 THROUGH 5800. MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF THE IMPR%EMENT ACT OF 1911 } } f R R f City Council Minutes December 16, 1907 :age 14 K G_CITf MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS ? G1. MOBILE HONE RENT STABILIZATION - Consideration of an agreement, the RaiichD Cucamonga Mob a Home Park mo ccord, between the City of Rancho Cucanga and all mobile home park owners pertaining to rent stabilization in mobile home parks. Stiff report by Mark Lorimer, Senior Administrative Assistant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Jack Williams, Chairman of RCMORE, encouraged Council to approve the accord. Ile went into details of the process that was used to bring about the compromises from both the park owners and residents for this accord. Bill Schweinfurth, Director of Operations for the Alta Laguna Mobile Home Park Association, also encouraged approval of the Accord. There being no further response from the public, Mayor Stout closed the public discussion. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve the accord and direct staff to forward it to the owners for signing. Moticn carried unanimously 5 -0. G2 REPORT ON PARKING LANE MAINTENANCE ALONG THE tIORTH SIDE OF FOO.HILL BOULEVARD 8ETW EEN ARCHIBALr AY EIIUE D RAHONA AVENUE• ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO KLUSMAN AVENUE: AND KLUS AVENUE TO HELL MAN - Staff report by Russel Magu re, City Engircer. Mr. Maguire presented some slides slowing the various problems along the north side of Foothill Blvd. Council directed an inquiry to staff as to when the RDA could become the source of funding for such improvements. Mr. Wasserwan stated ha didn't know but it certainly would be worth looking Into. Councilman Buquet expressed that he felt the feeding should come from the RDA. Councilwoman Wright asked if Council could get an idea of what the entire project would cost if we decided to do the work ourselves. Councilwoman Brown concurred she would like to see what the problems were and what the cost of the entire area was first, then we could prioritize them. She still, however, had a problem in setting a precedent. f City Council Minutes December 16, 1997 Page 15 Mayor Stout also concurred that we should look into the possibiliti of using RDA funds. ACTION: Council uirected staff to investigate and to bring the item back the second week of January, 1988 far consideration. f f f f f« H. COUNCIL BUSINESS H1. Consideration of appointing a subcommittee to interview and make recommendations on appointments to the Historic Preservation Commission. ACTION: Council appointed Mayor Stout and Councilwoman Wright as the subcommittee. 112. Consideration of reinstating Marketing Public Relations Subcommittee. ACTION: Council appointed Councilwoman Brown and Councilwoman Wright as the subcommittee. I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING I1. Councilman Buquet stated that the contractor for the Haven Avenue Median construction should be contacted regarding some general risk reductions, especially at night and requested that a report �:omo back to Council on this. I2. Mayor Stout asked for a report on how we would replace ari the trees lost in the recent wind storm. None submitted. J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC City Council minutes December 1G, 1987 Page 16 K. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Wright. seconded by Buquet to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk Approved: a IY January 6, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Renular Heetine A, CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of tho City of Rancho Cucamonga met an Wednesday in is Community 9161 BP Line Road. Rancho Cucamonga- The meeting was called to ord at 7 35pm.byMayor Dernis L Stout. Present el e J o ncill and members: Deborah oennis L Brown. , Stouharles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey Markmpresent n c City Clerk, Beverlya %a9Authe'ete AssistanteCity.Manager ,,tRobert,Rizzo. Senior Administrative Assistant, Mark Lorimer; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Brad Buller; City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Building officialtor, Jerry a t; Administrative Services Director, James Hart, Resource Center Coordinator, f • f : f : B AYNOumcEMENTS(PRESENTATIONS 81. Presentation of B2. Presentation of 10 -Year Service Awards: Rex Whitney, Maintenance Crew Supervisor Beverly Authelet, City Clerk, Records Managemant Coordinator James C. Frost, City Treasurer B3. Mr announced resolved and Wasserman h did not need Council this l eveningFMr. IWasserm n also session to tconsider ependingolitlgatlonhregardingu Lincoln ik nchoaAssociates announ versus Cucamonga School District. B4. Mayor Stout requested that Consent Calendar item C6 be removed for discussion. f f f f f p C. CONS Payrollpendingo12 /24/87 for theltotalNamount2of6$1,637 ?919 02, and 12/30/87 and _ C2. Approval to receive and ° :te curre, +t investment Schedule as of December 22. 1987. C3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Baer and Nine, Stop N Go Markets, National Convenience Stores Incurporated, Southwest Corner of Haven Ave. and Lemon. C4. Alcoholic Beverage application for Off Sale General, The Vons Companies, Inc. 877e 19th Street. C5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General, Red Hill Liquor, Gurbachan Singh Sandhu, 8939 Foothill Blvd. CE. Approval to modify lease for rental of City property at 111 N Grove, Upland, California, by dropping the restriction of no children over three years of age allowed to reside on the property and authorize the Mayor to sign the new lease. Mayor Stout requested item be removed for discussion. C7. Approval to declare as surplus property and authorize the sale of three (3) Nang workstations. CO. Approval to designate Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director, as alternate representative on the Board of Directors of the California Municipal Insurance Authority. RESOLUTI(V NO. 88 -001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DESIGNATING AN ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OF THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY C9. Approval to purchase replacement vehicle from Intergovernmental Service Fund. CIO. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 3 to CO 87 -20 for Don Greek and Associates fnr Design Administration Services for the following projects: 19th Street Improvements, Zircon to Amethyst, the Alta Loma Assessment District and the Arrow Route Bridge Widening (Cucamonga Creek; for an additional f,,e of $9,000.00 being paid from the funds budgeted for each respective project. C11. Approval to execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 88 -01) with United Title Company to prepare title reports, litigation guarantees, escrow services, etc., for 19th Street Improvement from West City Limits to Jasper Street. The maximum fee is $12,750.00 to be funded from Systems Development Fund. City Council Minutes January B. 1988 Page 3 C12. Approval to purchase a H1- Ranger Model 5H -55 from West Coast Utility Equipment Co. of Fontana, California, as sole source vendor for the amount of $35,987.00. C13. Concept approval to modify the conditions of approval of Tentative Tract 12671 to include the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, direction to the Planning Commission tc hold a public hearing for the purpose of considering such modification at their January 27, 19a8 meeting and approval to allow the crediting of the costs of the traffic signal incurred by the developer aga'nst System Development. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AT THEIR JANUARY 27, 1988 MEETING, FOR THE PURPOSE OF MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT 12671 TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE C14. Authorize the appropriation of $20,732.84 from the Federal Aid Urban Funds, (FAU) account number 24 -4637 -8068, for the final payment for the Archibald Avenue Trunk Sewer and Street Construction project to T.A. Rivard, Incorporated. C15. Approval to authorize the expenditure of $18,479.00 from the Park Developmcnt Funds for increased drainage and hardcourt facility design work at Beryl and Lion Parks by Recreation Systems, Inc. C16. Approval of authorisation to expend $38,864.64, plus $12.65 per day Interest from November 30, 1987 from account number 22 -4637 -8124, to reimburse Lewis Homes for Base Line Road improvements adjacent to City Park site per park site purchase agreement from Systems Fund. C17. Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids' for the Arrow Route Street Improvement Project, Phase I, located between Archibald Avenue and Turner Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C1B Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the Base Line Road Widening Improvement Project, from Archibald Avenue to Hellman Avenue. City Council Minutes January 6, 1988 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -0D4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ` CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'BASE LINE ROAD WIDENING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING i AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS CIS. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for: Tract 12316 -1 - located on the south side of Base Line Road east of Haven Avenue west of Deer Creek Flood Ch+innel. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $45,830.00 C20. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for: DR 86 -07 - located on the nortneebt cc:a ^r of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $10,600 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 86 -07 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK OR 86 -17 - located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and ki uan—Wvenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $14,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 86 -17 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12952, located east of Haven Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel and south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Glenfed Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12952 City Council Minutes January 8, 1988 Page 5 C22. Apprcval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12952 (Storm Drain), located east of Haven Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Glenfed Development, RESOLUTION NO. 88 -008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT IGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12952 (STORM DRAIN) C23. Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication (CO 88 -02) between Wayne and Erma Dennis and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9540 Roberds Court, located on the north side of Base Line road between Archibald and Amethyst. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM WAYNE AND ERMA DENNIS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME C24. Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication (CO 88 -03) between James and Stella Harrell and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9840 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JAMES AND STELLA HARRELL, AND AUT40RIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME C25. Approval of Agreement for installation of Public Improvement and Dedication (CO 88 -04) between Martin and Marie Lozano, Miguel Ruiz and Rose Marie Briseno and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9850 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM MARTIN AND MARIE LOZANO. MIGUEL RUIZ AND ROSE MARIE BRISENO, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME City Council Minutes January 6, 1988 Page 6 C26. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for MDR 86 -24 located on the east side of Santa Anitd Avenue, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Russe.l Stanley West, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA'ICHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -24 C27. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 87 -21 located on the south side of Sixth Street, between Archibald Avenue and Lucas Rancho Road, submitted by The Barmakian Group. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCY0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -21 C28. Set public hearing for February 3, 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13445, Parcel Map 10617, DR 87 -21, DR 87 -15 and DR 87 -09 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 35. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 35 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 88 -015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO OkJER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 35 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C29. Set public hearing for February 3, 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 13440. 13441. 13442, 13444 and 13445 (Victoria) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 7. City Council Minutes January B. 1980 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -016 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREF'T LIGHT *.NG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 40. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY LOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION .w. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C30. Sct public hearing for 'ebruary 3, 1988 - Approval to Annex Parcel Map 10617, DR 87 -21, OR 87-15 and OR 87 -09 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nu. 6 as Annexation No. S. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PO. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS AHNEXA71011 NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C31. Set public hearing for February 3, 1988 - Approval to Annex Parcel Map 10617, OR 87 -21, DR 87 -15, OR 87 -09 and MDR 86 -24 (Industrial /Commercial) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXAT "d NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 1. City Council Minutes January 6, 1938 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -021 I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO i MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar a excluding item C6. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. a, s Discussion of Consent Calendar Item 6. C6. Approval to modify lease for rental of City property at 111 N. Grove, Upland, California, by dropping the restriction of no children over three years of age allowed to reside on the property and authorize the Mayor to sign the new lease. Mayor Stout asked if there would be a point in time when this rental property ' would be surplused. Mr. Wasserman responded yes, when the new City yard is completed. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by King to approve item C6. Motion carried 4- 1 -0. (Wright no.J D. CONSENT ORDINANCES D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOdGA - A propose to amen the Victoria Pan Text to regu re a Con tonal Use permit for certain community facilities as specified in the Commercial Standards and Community Facility sections of the Victoria Community Plan. City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet, read the title of Ordinance No. 332. i City Council Minutes January 8, 1988 Page 9 E ._ ORDINANCE NO. 332 (second reading) AN OROINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 87 -03. TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE .}„ PERMIT FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES AS SPECIFIED IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARDS AND COMMUNITY FACILITY SECTIONS OF THE ' VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Brown to waive full reading of the Consent Ordinance and to approve the Consent Ordinance. Iw Lion carried unanimously 5 -0. E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS E1. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: Report was presented by the City Manager. Mayor Strut opened the meeting for public hearing, there being no response, the public hearing was closed. a. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -022 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 110. 41 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 85 -06 (PCL. 3 OF PARCEL MAP 8345) MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 88 -022. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. ;s City Council Minutes January 6, 1988 Page 10 RESOLUTION HU. 88 -023 A RESOLffiION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXP.TIOH NO. 11 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 86 -39 MOTION: ,bved by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 88 -023. Motion carr'ed unanimously 5 -0. c. r r f a f R RESOLUTION NO. 88 -02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 34 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13444. OR 85 -06 AND DR 86 -39 MOTION Moved by P.uquet, seconded by Brawn to continue Resolut.z^ No. 88 -024 to January 20, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. f f f f f r d s recommenaea tnat tnit issue RESOLUTION NO. 88 -025 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 86 -39 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to continue Resolution No. 88 -025 to January 20, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. f f f a a a ■ city Council Minutes January 8, 1988 Page 1, ` Mayor being no Stout the publicnhearing was closed. public hearing on items E2 ano ti. ."arc closed RESOLUTION N0. 88 -026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ' CALIFORNIA. ARCELMMAPS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 10008 NOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 88 -026. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. L f 1 f f f E3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -027 A RESOLUTION 0, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING .%MEHOEO ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -2 FOR TRACT MAP 1:113 NOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 88 -027. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. f f f f 1 f METALS - Appeal of the riann,ng ...W.. „. -^ - p>: existing overhead utilities along 7th Street for a proposed warehouse addition to the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the east corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street (APN 209- 262 -13). (Applicant had requested the 4tem to be continued.) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being nc response, the public hearing was closed. NOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to continue the item to January 20, .988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. f f i f f f r l N p r City Council Minutes January 6, 1988 Page 12 E5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COIIDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -OS - APPEAL - CROSS AND t MN LUTHERAN CHURCH - Appea of t e P ann ing Commiss on s oecis on j• approving a 4900 square foot senctuary building and a 2300 square foot office and classroom building; and operation of an extended day nursery and preschool f' on 5 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - .Y< APN: 227- 061 -03. Planning staff report presented by Debra Meier, Associate Planner and the Engineering staff report presented by Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Pat Gearhart, 6862 Eti «.inda Avenue, expressed that there were too many churches already within the same area and that the church's nursery school was really a business and that Council should take this into consideration. Mayor Stout stated he felt uncomfortable discussing this since no one was present from the church. After a call had been made to the church, it was discovered they had not received a notice of the meeting. Mr. Markman, City Attorney, asked Council to continue the item for four weeks in order that the item could be renoticed since the church had not received the necessary notice. ACTION: Council concurred to continue the item to February 3, 1988. f f f f f f E6. 6,,, ur nw,6nu uuow+unun - nn amenoment to proviae proceaures for requesting mod f cat on of ra 1 service development standards and to authorize 'medium wholesale storage and distribution' as a permitted use in Subarea 13 bounded by the 1 -15 Freeway on the east, Buffalo Avenue on the west, approximately 280' south of 8th Street on the north end approximately 1,335' north of 4th Street on the South and approving issuance of a Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Alan Warren, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet, read the title of Ordinance No. 333. City Council Minutes January 8, 1988 Page 13 ORDINANCE NO. 333 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -02 ADDING SECTION G.6 TO PART III AND INCLUDING 'MEDIUM WAREHOUSING STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION' AS A PERMITTED USE IN PART V. SUBAREA 13 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (ISP) MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet, to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 333 and set second reading for January 20, 1983. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. E7. TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 87 -04 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - A request to modify the land use esignations from Office Par (OFT, Coamunity Commercial (CC) and Commercial (C) to Community Commercial within the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APH: 1077- 421 -05, 06, and 13. Staff report presented by Debra Meier, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: John Melchor, representing the applicant. Mr. Neither stated the staff report clearly reflected what they wanted to do' he would be happy to answer any questions. There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet, read the title of Ordinance No. 334. ORDINANCE NO. 334 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 87 -04 TO MODIFY THE LAND USE DESIGNATIOIIS FROM OFFICE PARK (OP), COMMERCIAL (C) AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO OFFICE PARK (OP) AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) INVOLVING A 71 ACRE PARCEL WITHIN THE TER:IA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND SPRUCE AVENUE - APH 1077 - 421 -5, 6 AND 13 MOTION: Moved by Brown, second by King, to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 334 and set second reading for January 20, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5- 0. • f t 4 k City Council Minutes January 6, 1988 Page 14 F. PUBLIC HENRINGS Fl. improvements across the Base Line Road froatage of sal continued from December 16, 1987.) RESOLUTION 110. 87690 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC HEED A.ND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ACTION: Item had been resolved before the Council meeting. tit :t• F2. BASE LINE WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN AP.CHISALD AND HAVEN AVENUES - Public Hearing of protests regarding Order to Construct Public ImprovemenEs at 9549 Roberds Court in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Improvements along Base Line frontage of property). (Hearing continued from December 16, 1987.) RESOLUTION NO. 87691 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 9549 ROBERDS COURT (APN 202 - 161 -09) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORMIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, SECTIONS 5870 THROUGH 5880, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF THE IM^ROVEHEMT ACT OF 1911 ACIION: Item had been resolved before the Council meeting. t t t t t R G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS (Redevelopment Agency Reconvened at 8:00 p.m.) City Council Minutes January B. 1988 Pago 15 Mr. Lam announced that there were two actions necessary. The City Council n rect and the resolution needed to RedevelopaentpAgency had approve nstruct the budgettransfers and the resolution. The list of prioritiesywhl Wright included with tonight''s material�est meeting a stated he felt this was an be assumingCaltransp He did not feel responsibilities. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT RErONSTRUCTION OF PORTIONS OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ARE OF BENE,IT TO RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND DETERMINING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO AGENCY ACTION: MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve the RDA budgget transfers and Resolution No. RA 88 -01. motion carried 4 -1 -0. (Wright no.) (See RDA minutes for Resolution title.) CITY reconstry tt ACTION: MOTION: approveeResolution Nos 88 -07.8. by Hotion carried 4-1-0. (Wright no.) carrtled unanimously 5-0. ,Thecmeeting adjourneda 8 adjourn 5 p RDA meeting. Motion it. COuMCIL BUSINESS H1. Haven Median Report. (Requested by Buquet). Russell Maguire, City Engineer, presented the status report on the Havt� Avenue Median Improvement. ACTION: Council received and filed the report. City Council Minutes January 6, 1988 Page 16 H2. Discussion of tree replacement program. (Requested by Stout). Mayor Stout directed staff to research and bring back a report on rebruary 3, 1988 agenda on the followirg: 1. The number of trees lost as a result of wind damage. 2. How much will it cost to replace them. 3. Establish a replacement process to include reserve funds. 4. Lcok at replacing landscaping from previous storms. R R R R R R H3. Appointment of persons to Gardiner M. Spring Auditorium Committee. (Requostea by Stout) Mayor Stout stated he would like to serve on this committee. ACTION: Council concurred in the appointment of Mayor Stout to the committee and also have the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation appoint someone to serve on the committee. R R R -f R R I. IDENTIFICATION Of ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING 11. Councilwoman Wright requested eiscussion of a light policy for Red Hill Park to be placed on the January 20, 1988 agenda. 12. Mayor Stout requested a report on the County's policy for asset forfeitures In drug related cases tc be placed on the February 3, 1988 agenda. 13. Council requested a report on the dust control problems in Terra Vista be placed on the January 20, 1988 agenda. 14. Councilman 8uquel requested that the Council Contact Fonn be expanded to include all commissioners. Staff responded that they would fallow -up on this request and receive comments from the Council. If there was not an unanimous consent in doing this, the item would come back on a future agenda. f ! R f * f 1 City Council Minutes January 8, 1988 Page 17 J. COMMMICATIOMS FROM THE PUBLIC Addressing Council was: John Melcher, representing the various Lrwis Homes entitles. Mr. Meic:ier advised Council that the company was working on the problems resulting from recent windstorms in Terra Vista. He stated he would be working on Saturday and would be available to meet with residents at that time. Dave Adams, Orangewood Homes in Terra vista, stated they had extrrme dust problems during December, and he did not want to live under those conditions In the future. City Manager, Lauren Wasserman, stated that staff was trying to set up some meetings with Jerry Grant, Building Official, and Mr. Adams to discuss these problems. Mel Less, 7181 Daybreak Place, demonstrated the affect of the windstorm on his mailbox (paint had been sandblasted off one side). John Lavy, Daybreak Place, asked what the City was going to do immediately since Santa Ana winds were predicted for this coming weekend. Mr. Lavy wanted to know who they could contact if this problcd should happen again. Mr. Wasserman stated that people could tail Jerry Grant during the week or Mr. Melcher could provide them with his number. There was soma discussion about who owned the property north of Highland. Mr. Wasserman stated that staff will have to look into who that property owner was. John Ferns, asked why Lewis had been allowed to grzde the land in August, knowing that he would not be building until February. Ruth Harvey, 10749 North View, presented pictures of her home inside and outside of the results of the windstorm. Andre Soto, 7125 Parkside, stated there was about $8,000 worth of damage done to his property. Mr. Armstrong, 10741 North view Drive, emphasized that on Christmas Day their company could not enter by their front door but had to use the back door. City Council Minutes + Ja..uary 6, 1988 Page 18 Mayor Stout stated that Council was sympathetic to the problem and would do everything they could to alleviate problems in the future. 4 t 1 t! k K. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to adjourn to a closed session to discuss pending litigation, Lincoln Rancho Associates vs. Cucamonga School District OCY42863. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 P.M. Approved: Y Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk 1 amt: 9 } �ooNONO aooOeNmNO aI-o +aonol- oe000r +noon +rn • o!1_n ono P000NnononDnNOOamnoProoDar000NNaS r L, q ^n•npn „ +NNNaY +Nryp.• +rOgOPNOdNON OPODNgryde <1 ryNNnndS NaryN+amNM1 +rn o.. h•P�and�nM1O N_PNrP•• a nnoNa s 3; n M1mn n rn N r e ..�nr n •' a < i vi va i .°ri„°.r'Y1°panoPe.,nn•rmal -mDO .•Nn +Na, -ao ..N n+N + „f + + +NN �N�NNNNaa aaa-Y aaarrNl.rr -n NN.- �oommo J 21 0n 0 n + No•nVonNonno0n0n0N000n0Nn0M10N0n00nM100nN00N0 M1 � 1 u ^ y TLL W NzQN _ J ' ISO PNQ <ti�nti ,. •••Yi�L WN q 0P\NN r M �`rMrW drz N �uNw ^ mr •. ^y F Pn M•.M _ rJLL�¢¢6 . q60 W O Ot _ _O V�w WW mS Y ' n Yewn SWU•"000„ qOp R 06 �0 ZZON6•\ip 1 1 Wy <02_ yw{d EQUiiW YUY ^Y^ LL Y�WUlV�t ^Y N <mY'<sm >�• JY�t� O^ .J w w< Np1.J02 O Y 1 NV^ w�7 L,wi. <S0,0 0 �1'ZV \r �( ^U OZ Y� U^ Y� wOKr y1• y, • {SPS O�r LNLL S•wY rOlOy•wpLL <i • 00+ V6N m V Ui QL N3 \L YQ O ��YY000 Q,n,.Q N 4.,p00 O +> 1 oO ,JnYN yUOO .LLi,U2 <LLQ'^"Vr� NWNWm 6NSYVlJn S S W WI YVNNry•W { <r Ln^ ZJJrw�J2 r_WSYJ7YrnN 01 WW ^^ >W SYJ 2p.Vwq:Q\ ^�WFwZiSF LI W < %pL �.LL•O ^OL J9NU C <NVO¢•• Lr t «^NY ^Y6Q� NOi. IQ ¢N.• 1 JSr 0066W JLU 2Pm<6.{ V SVN Y¢r< ' WW�'1{l Y VrV>JOw �,Iy pp¢WOi Y OOWS <r�r,Q. w'; LLWE< EO Qy f�pr LL6•N 91r pWUJOE ^WWLL <CyPLJp2 OOOZV IV YNM16NQNLLL•N••NZ {m�L�! >YNI[,VN iOC,Y.,JA ZMy 1 u .i. U w r M i ' •'LL u� �iwD^..�^ .usizxr b' zrQ� N 1 2 o LLy N ^fir N ; ti ^SOm W ou< a srYN uiwu z¢23W 'z LOwiWN JJJti� MrWY Y> 6 < • NWJtW2 Y Zr,.Lr tl {606 i•-• Q NiWO 1 24ur 0_ pNrO %.•L t L i uF�J 6 V a� .yiwSZO O nL, O < »>�J0L¢002`.UOW¢w 21S.1 i • Y_V .O <Q V 6.iiJ%U"�eQ�•L S uO, Y¢i ,Si ^y6Nr60WOVOJWv j rOrO2WVW6V g 1 ztrwl oY¢NLLU aN. -I.r �i•i m is «...•,- t u< • ^NY wwzY JJ <> oowz � m7s`Y'ar rruo Fez <.w.:J OZWLY LLmOS� <rWWwwVw< OWVLEL L� MONO 1 t3 .O U OrJ WY l< y,<Vw�M <•w6 JYJ QQ4J n, i VV JOSLV�Sy J JLOY<SWtO4 �LL6� 6y <wY< Sr -rz<ru oNyoN 2 M J J < tFN { 6 00 w.YW ••m 4 1 yWYJJQ`J <yrtiW6¢NNNNNSN %�YUr� <J <`JWw p C >VtiYj e Wi rm b•iip uU «« «<�mmgOeemCmyyy <yyVVUVVUVVO< a Y 1 LLt; +iwNONa NOOnnO +arnnnaOr +NI�N• -•O NOq n••h alnp nP+ _ Pda ^N On nn^ .0 rymnnnO +OmONmPrandr0Ogiry.l a0' r ■ P qP YpNPMONOVNYPOP ►JPOPrdnrPOPdjOrJYr Jgpy 1 ONdNYVANgONOMPgNN JPNdNpNpyrNVVYPyyNPNYdNN ly 1 r90SDm 2 r3 T aT�n «wwwww SSyO mOI.T m O o. y er «nn zzzz nowt am�oetis«s i p wy�a sect n�<DpyrooevmT�rnTT ra r.pNnSi 1 zp�1. .. zn illT� m an n3- .NY�MZ i Tac. N. %oeNrYZ «r �w 3t ioN3 LmLm Ty yyiw�m � 1 rNi zs� smNra Da > «oza noz z (f2L Srti ywr Y >y�mC N OOL nTmZNTN p_'t� _ �Sn s_zyni i�tnT Npon T�s�T _n w.Im��S i L Y L n Y T [Zt f n`N Y .piN NOAO IN T) C y m iie nn TN Nizi .. -7.-- n« av°iTn z y ni N -zt a m^ <xrr n Tc �:� iP nN « i N M m 12 9 ON Yr nv a y T S y p ff11 1111 TOy<yIn<In maaSmNlnNQny�ymwNr Y2Y «OV nA VrCn<CT�OOr<Of «din <•3iw 1 r rTntlrYr2iZi••Si mlr >wrowYg2zTZ <O.`I >�lm %DS OYTrlpll naa a>m ;w m SM�OrTmpS %�Oi9 X01 }9r p501N j�=.Z.N TZ CS1K.m1`O� >T� 1 nm >my TOTSYm mOm >2•>OO N:"AO O TTr IT .SimYmYO \Z O YZ r..1001In p • wTTm2w02ZONTt 9. naoi ozeN- .\zmNM Nqe zaYTe > «Ym iN Sr %mN'm J N nA «rZrTyCY <r y IA OZTyT9`V� r Iw pP NS «C NAI'•YTrOwOwmTym O ONr w�OT pnOm70pOm 31+9PT2 2 O 1 n n>2 ^ DTOmVT >FSY > 2` C�M NO S NtPnN GN•.. nmZYT�IT Yi�r !Cr C29 1 DTOT rn[•P \ %9 LrY K T n Ny. O• O > A 'Go OvgOrOONT r2 Er rnw n�nnnn iP ni >n0 n ni On r Y1O nnnn2 nan V_• O. O•�'.� pCm r r O 1 %YY «Z9 yP • °N 01 N�9 .°i •.°i2T . ° iT.°i .°.ndn�asT a ma- � s• a i z a•�aAt pain 1 � u °i a° yolmn nrn j� io w. worm y=y i z o MWN Sm sp. m Y ypp ... m msm 9 « (l N Np .SiIN N NZI. .3n AM� N N yy n I°n °NN°°ONNN°°° NN° NNNN..NNNNNNNN NNN00p0000000J0�0+0�0 ,y > ui.n N a.n.iI NI°n�°n giaMVV PgIVNnOdO YPqJ VNrOdOyPM JVNYOdO�+PIdI��YN.'O20Yp 1� Z 1 y P J Yr n W N NN O ;I j rOPVU.JOpr.°iPJr Pr dPJJOgNOOr r.V•J.ViIV ��JYNdNU li m OOfJ.000 pd Vr dO0S0 p00PJ VfggNYwrp pONNNY� pgnNYd j2 N O000Y 00l NrOPOOV000CVOO JPO}OOnPOOPONyOYNdN IY a iy i h i o'n oo�� °o�P+ow.go < °q °m oonn:p alFVa onoa °Yr -.^. o+°�o$oo ^o ±o� FI py1 PI�NNmPYONON YqN ^PngNPPnP ^YLnNhOFrPNSmNn n ^0°P^� ^nYryO�N ?= PNgPwP M/°�CY °N� =Y OnOmnINV ^O nn� < 6 N ^ p n <U' 1 S 1 OPO ^NnI N.pM NP �YlYf �� „MNgNNr M.F11N ~N.°n NU°�M „qd Q 61 NNNnn nnnnnnnn�Y L y� gggqNqqNqS NnNNq NYC nnS «£RSryrypryHnryryryO°000 0000000000V0°OOOOSO V 3� NNNNNM1nNNnM1NN N.Vn NM1NnNNFNn N r O F o • .L.. Wa�`uW WwF j$.`WW �F .. < .Y-WFW LL 1 KN ioK< K�KK°WiW uW_.LL.W_ o�Wio W V!:U� m 1 ZY� SP V � Z6 SWW W =r 1 o ,° oioo Fm oeW o00 X02 1 U�t V�U� Y YYYUUYUtsYYU ^'Y ^F Z� V6V U 1 f[N J6 Uo J J� Nv .00mC.LLY N N:Nif 24 ON``OS aya uJ U W <LL�� YJF p 0 1 tW.IONW RY �' J• KJ JW <N N 1 t ^� WWym WZN .OtW =N W,Z mF'FyW �F � NVmNrUr• arNi?YL JN2K p icF M.i. Loom�.1 �� y � +ems °>pm Lm.�y Y1VZWiZN �tr.N 2`U0 °tV SU6iW< Ft26r3 6 KF6 ° <a KN9^ JVO 6% OI^.p'Wn�OY'�nWnM1.[J/V UZNWYZJmI V2W 2LL6LOON <rW 1 �Z�•< MNLZ ^pO2W °<LLWVWLN<LN O_SNL OKV} }r %WLrZJ °Nw<470J <W�°uw Y6t.'Y V_ • O 1 O <tt <. i<tOKNMr ^"pr OpR Vii° WW 1 Wm�2mNLL Uf6 ^M1 �� J n �I S.NV�1WO IiOZNJ60�r G�6cr ^; YWZr ^u10 N1. WNJ 6. \YOiQLK�OgnnYGGpNLY ^pVU <0�26 JY 7LLG<JWYrLV < J ¢U Y . LYY Y 1 .°i ti O NNN LrW O 1 O• L pZ O WWW Z � J9w 1 m SJC <rw wiK2 W .<i�� .SL �.p Fi�MW4 M1 U � r .o ps Job oWS a° z��u .N.. Y uo.2.i�lsi osia J rpiOWLN0Nir02y NOU�SNO pp NrJJ �w° Kr<` Wtt OU�N JONOWLW ^6 JSFQNWmiuiZ �V YY�KJitWY�JN�s �WjY N WsWLJ'J6 O< LS°JriSRJ WQ O z`NJ6 .�iV �f V O p iV LLL_SYY • VV U�' «UpN 'LY _ 0'y Y °r YtwLWWr pKLLWOF < ° %< O 1 }vv..ee FNWOLL }yW i'2 N 1 rrrF ZO ZtrWW�o1�ZU6JmONUSZ�Vr M Z7WjS <3Jtip ^� 1 pVFONC�OJ }UJ JJM <YLUuI1FJ JJSNWJ %J UUUOI�VNWrO<FY90F�U`t �O {.IV6r�.�Z }LLZ «j S «W m 1 LL� « <WrN6K�M tWMr <SLLO ° ppppppppYV6KN66NNNNZNNNNNNNrM�r }7Y7rY13 ,. � n ♦nN ^° � ^qaq ^Nnn ^n ^n nn »nil -nN ^n nl- MgtiJnl. 3 Y Y PaNOiNO 1 ' iuOrPPr 10 1 o err ra I> • IK P uN %�NfT I O >Sllnn O >SDn C�719b >NT pAy 1 O OKO =(•2 � _ >a 1 > rY w0•. D n_ _O _ i 1• f 1 N n N 2 I n � TT 7fi A(i0 IT.•n TlS nz•% nmivc T'•. rd" JTCTtyK ny'Da T� wST2� r T w< �• �n aJ C dti } N wC OS Tn Onn ma > r rep o rs :'i uzr r �eT • a mae i m n Tn.• z O n a °vv °w •4•o o0 ; i ilriu�oao ii i GP �i > 1 rJrNNN UIP mm ; � J edPO r Oy 0Y4P0 �r ■ I m 4 < ¢ L j < c � L ¢ V 2 u z f ¢ 8 O i 6 2 p I ° WI O YI <I y O� O O O O P O••OrOOJ 0 a O p e S••S OM1rP i i 1 a 1 ra:n o•• F •+ O ON 1 r ��ra�.norv.: +m «oao� r +pa�nnvnr- }1 -�r-i �.P•P•.°•.°. °n n° �°. ono •�'aSo i. o n rvnnnn 1 1 1 1 a� +on�Pa u 4wPwP P O O 6 W ^rr0�• N n F� iw w i 00 0 t ys�^ J Ze V < W �p <LL • u •2 V W Wow; {Si N W� w {YONU1 S W ZY i >Q 6 Op Y i u Y W6i°CuC J i a t�gY�wU Vu226 W N i u i °i naofs,v < o s z Wo 8 fU J U p Q N Y oW Sl < ti� V J 2 fiNM s w � ¢omsW ^Q i u � x Lu N.Ni i N z y i ueN..siJ ........ eo.eparr..N Ono oo pl- �nomgrN +n000 +00••POOarph } 000PNwgw000 h +Np 00 SPa00awNrgaw °N w•°i •• Nti N.yw rora r ngrNawePONnn+NanmPOwrvgr epa�puemmPPP�M�on�o�ooaoo ry000�000000000 NnrynnnryNnnNnnnNNNnNNNNN Li T cs ww Or0 w Q6 OQN QYW NW Q66 QLt �z wzaeznz rz zxz izz 00 z[. oral'o aou air WU YYQ2KYnp U�VYSVY� YF� L{, J W3Wai 0•r1 WQ > i,i • c oiQi •�tW V wtiN Vn O LO`.10 tQ ° NMV °U>YIp000pmNG W Nii `YJORUiiNN SUOi ylf Y Q W NVSNNOOIWJ NrJ iYtll tWN OJ 26Q ��N O» <NWf pOJV•Zi6t «WQUwJFit ar��`iif[Vr•Li4WxT�3N3i: J O>u °VF��WWiQ <J6VS <N enJeendN..aNb�w:�¢wWW3 e u u � r < " 3 s : u z Ni uNa z w r VOWwp � O prp 2oN V `` ••V y }NOVUVrOV4uNiV1 V•Zi y pW .r LJ••••WJ p. VI<[¢OFW¢Wyy �L W i•Vi YYV¢.i Y U0i= 0W<WN-JtrI�Qi < >0� t�ult �V�UY4yQZ Z ut_�ZN wr��auoa <o °OJflWJaJ oVW iOY�WiNNWOVY< «WWrtWy « � <ttFf0p0000mpp00 +Oq/wV •OiNPOfngYgYryNNSp nlryaM = ^q mr ��y0 �ryPm� F NPPON�P OOVlPP88PPppdrOP OVpPVPnNMPri p•1pp OmMPVVPVMMVPIPJVNVYV�ar VPVJOpppOVYPNpNdJV 00nVOUVdrpVVaOPP L YSfpITOOMnImmTTn.TTTmOO �n�•nnnnnn()()��n nnnrPPP aNSTZPruFmZmm9 a.Fi.m MNNYmr n'°J��i °Drr��Y2pT =r1 r Pial`I.T <m�oci�'irD O.r+i i�4c c��il^n.".�.r.s �mmz�O r�rxa znmi >z>rN}i riN�mn z.�.o Nrra °a� n «rC Oc �yi TnnsNOr e..lm �NKZSn - no }Nrr .<. �in-°iiss�z D iss��.F�.ew T NN.zcno�i orz. -z XNOn n C } r �r n �N O DsyNZaNrr � :eoFmzrrpna <+I>x m�+....na�29o�i szw�a x.°.o xr..'�SO.n `�.r...?. riz r'• »T^ 1 mzaT..�pr�Nazni�i> �mozn>eyNna ys.z io nmm�i °c .^..ianr�mrrzninzy Nr<..m nNZ ron�o�si �..�."r.A..� nNZrrnern nn w s Nm � TPw % z rP' }z�a��igaYrn !xi'iz �M � irrt'o N. x -N^. mom n .° r. s%raa ri �i .m•1'n" a "aw «> 9nnn n x mT POA mnTT T r r 2z nm P Ox x> ODSYyf ax YZ AAD a LnA � N>rr 0 .xn� nn n �n n ao ran y nonzn o Fn n aO �b ° .rn r Y.�i. rNw N Nnw nw .2O a < Q pNN pNM pNNNNVNNNNNp- p-UNp -NNNN pN NpN N pN Np N pNpMN pNp N pN ypy N pN pNN PPP°0•P PiJV�PUV.OIPTPPPPPPP PPPPP °P P.O°�P•°P. °P PppPP PP NJ. YNrOdP�Pi JYNrOiOVPMJVNrOimVPOJVNV O i g N _ J N VNV nV r. - n zsr o OJrYYV OOVP ... . .......... yOPOVNNpMPWJNOJ pN PrYNp OOP0000 °OOVOO�J000rOOPM POPOS000dO00pPV000 i a b b r t N z� n 1 N °eo °o �-�o nl°nn °n °oo oho °oo °o °o nn eon °rn °O:nee .r. °o afn n °onognon ZI YO�^ryF �wO.. nOOwO „OaONmMnaPnannNO ^OOOIOONnnN <1 N ONmFFFnYYp O OPPmPYn••aPwYnNnNOOYwPN ••OfmYPY VI-wP Ow0 JI ^Y••n0 = tl•'IPf ^ ^^ =Y 6 < 1 O •• P .• N •• ^ P N w 31 < i s •i �FmPOrNnrnaFapo ^NnrnaFmoo ^nnrNaFmpe ^nnf na i Q. oo�o$o�uo�o$oo�o00�0088000��+8 otl oa8og8 ao �ouoo Y S� hryNNhryNNNM1NNNhNNNNNNNNNNNryNNNNNNNNNryNNNNry o i W�> Y W aW W Lc g ”' •'^ . z Wry { Q L Q 1 <_266^ aJ u=QQ 2^CQ P6NQ6„O LL 6V Q U QQ ztzzi.2.ni w min F.z-ia ^ �ns i u iY: Wr65`i•J 5< ^Stf<. � e�eeWJ 1 red 5 3 65 i�uu�.< --w °^ u1Q.uu� _wy u••Z3^uouu•iziooi 'u u -2 uu ' SW.•VV •NnJN .•6ry rLJ ` JO w L <•• 6 U N 22 '- x Q •••SU •C�Wt LLO <U< VOUyN ZO •• 6L {N ^ONJ�y ^UdNW WIt N6 <FV �•s F44 � ^wu�aFS ^su 1 "i <2¢WNNNi60\LL61mLLS�ONNrW U•Q•Q {YxNY 1t 1 F1y0 V NW2^ W _ ^QWB�W < <<G•tn S IV QI Nr UWNW06 r.• % < \LL >F LL N OS ^O ^ WW•'.i �oi'�i'••uarr°1iW <li•Q.•i wi¢zli •<••i�LL••h"'•i WQ.. x'WL". Ju o O; F 42ZrYW F <OLLLL <VW <JW<�[W]m Wwr_Q<6N pZ< L Vt iNO «V'Y <•+4 SQF<UVLLwVY " KI960i ^mONJ rl m Sw 060 <Y ppLLW LQ 9•- JQ6W�N O ^ O_ �•ZaN jW�ZWr=O {N n ��xN6LLOFJwiOWMpYW <O•[Q •^6L2 2� n4JLLQwti00 mV 5 lU O�LL« �N6NYCSNLmin)Sr�L'<IS LLW 2 N I UV U < V 2 I z z u it �� i NuW .. •' j O . • W ^V Y � 6 2p6 U U ]U{ <N4 LLY G y0•N VS < •=n O �Y 020WW N4 •O•• J< Q= <2 ' •O_ WV •Ni••Oi WZ uW N m.OiNr.Vi UJ Yp6p V� iV .6 Qs B_ mF i�0 Nym r1 ^u•Z ^`R <NLL uN �V�� u•.O•i0u2•uLLi S � X00 •ALL 'l'-. N`6wVGJJO t•V•r NmO O < ^OVJ 1 Fw Z2 On =•WQiJU<n�Q�_2ZS60wwVJJ�1 JO<LWm ' �JJ FF VJ W.SiQ �OLLWZVG2ULOV OF[.1J }W %N6�mVr «JSO OZQO•. <W 1[ J2atZN.. t<JLQ<- S�'Wn2WWMJ2N VN 2yZ ^ O O W 1 1 ••6 Q2< F N 0••2tt Z .......... O• UJ J KnON J tJJ � N�•2 Z• J m 1L�h2iWS�0QY< i Q O >i wOO N2 »<=Vi< V " 2 p{p<«F =WJ <O6Sy6SOWw6t••6Y •.1• 6O0WO QL 6< ^4`OQL FN •6i 6 •Q >n 1 �1 aaA^ NrnNFmNPPVnfnnanaYmmOnNanmF ^ ^NPNPn ^Na .•NY a^P ma.n nFnrOnYNOFFFN ^f nFN Wnnm ^••Mn a.•n ••••F .• 1 a ^�wPPti� ^m�ntlM1ww�^ NYPNOnyN�Yn^N� �Ny ^N • 1 .7_ H`'v .1 Y' I u diPPYPffPpPJpOT YWWWPNNWIY O YPJJYfOYJPYNJJf NmrPfYON� <NWNWJf WOOYYJNNmOdYWOVVON %1N^ TT =r/��wCCCYY�nMNNNNNNO >�N .>iMy MYwTT OYn> Eempz�n� oaD.aY y.N,lm Nra-N >mTr pnYYpN %r °raaaaa noiGn'o >n��°sl°)n °my nr SS YS�S rN+9 mSq m•IiSTRSS a e mrn�psT�� o °NrN�b z iwngl�'.gnn >n snsow y �T osni ory aTwTr�� > >S Inpc n wny n ez ro nTan vroo >TOq z pzNt'z° ^^ naamnrN N >w Y Oa WiM nn m0 nr! .. aT Ni' N >o ntziTa t^ Y Nrn sz �ooi n r A Z� SNp Y ne n aRD Om rPy 1^w °TTmMT °SIC m �0 OA _ Nmr Y�TM YNI�O ^pOmT rG �)ra NN G 1}r� y }N y O dOwrDa T� R)Ij .Ni m r-m ivnuos am rl <.. n Q.In �n� nnnr"w.r. n snr'nnY o`S� s ooyornw o Y ynes m Fmn ^'O n PrNI�YDii T 000 IRq paD Np a NO >'OaR n and Jn[ N ° rl MMT y=j PZ N MNNNNNyNyNNyyyw�NNNNpNNNpN y000000000pOOO�tf Pf•P pPPPPP Y pYGYYYYYyYYYVV PP TT .p MO�OO yPNIVNVOdOyP MiVNrOdOy M s N N P a VN a y J NNNJgreuNNJVOJNNry NP.W.ppr O OOYOyYP OO pO PfNlIOpdPr.�Y[)pOp N .p WOOOPO OipWfOMSOOVrUdC ONO 6 1 F q W m 1) 0 .m. z ° a O n p r > > e D > T m y J e COPY._ W A.nt Twld 9OR NCOMOUC eeveeese tgM4t1 ,. 0.,..m N AANrh Swa.e. CrrN 1NS...••..CalI.n41e W O.rYrdlm M.y..y.6A..61..e.4. t. n.9OI OF I t —NS931 Fol W SAti CtYiit "TINA /GCS leel Cadltloml irlerl q II6 AN&W.N. 6.. in" 06 a 0.. 1/11/49 O 1e47S] COOS 1611 w `N M. O.n L NAtA V OF A9111CAN= TY, Nlte..l C. i n•TDI W TtAt4wt*Nm m M m6 .w 6 6,000.w 41 AnnYs n. as.N a NwNWw Anti" rn. Mevl t 617110 t La.M M iir•m -Nn•e. wd 5... 9201 Yl.w An Weld C4.c IIA/ 91101 Yn YArnualm 10141 ] 611.00 IL 4A✓ p .a n w101 N M✓ M .Y. ...YN w w Ni.r4..•r N w .wl/w A rN . k— ul b 11 VAII d CUFCO Ca+l N e.. dmAJ91m pm 1[11, u�__. w.o• .r..w.r+r.•....r... ...r r.•.mrY r....... ....r.www.. •r. M Y wIw•Y .n•tiA �. V Y 1w+w wn••. M •.rw1 Y = y .• yW ,n +.� V r w•r= n. �..r a.. twr r nrr ..Y• M v wn •.. � •I Y war •.w nl . w.Yr � •q rY . W ,w••• Y N ••�•• . •w!•... ywY V Y •.Yw..w Y Yww•' L .•... • •w1. •wYr r/Yr. V Vr� ..Y Y w• � V ••••y .• r•rY •1. Yr . Y 4Y � y� n•w•1 w• w Y 1 .nl Y.• I•.YV r Y• . w,M Y .ter •rY•w Y IV wV r 4•w�• •• w n. wY. • ..•.w, w. •.• w w....•..t.. M ✓ti . Yw .1 � I •w1w, n1 M r •�• ••••r••• r, M .•Yw. M •w r •Mw . r lei r w �r rte• V . •.A. l9 APPLW.ATM BY TRANTIROR 11 STAB 09 CAUIOb C.w,.1 Pw r : w �..�...�..�..� +� r.ri w r�r +..rY .r�� .w.+�� n nr• w ww �..�.rr•�• +� �r r ....r. Y...Y r..r ✓•. r r .w•..... w �r..r .. r .w. r� + .. r� ••� I i.Y .w✓. w ••w.� r r tiwi W r w• w..• .M... w .Yw• nW w.. r4 w .wlr w• Y.r+ I • Y.. w W •.+ •••.•. w•• r• r .+n /w � r Yr � .•.. r •w.•. p � V W r r .nrr•w w�w.r•n.•V.I wI...V W.ly+w.•/i.I �r r�W r.••.�r•Y.Mr.•�•h ••M••Y. r Y•+ � r w•YY W. Y r.Y.�. D. Na WW Utkw Tfib U., fa DP iO. ONe A11.S.6 0 ea.4.4 n. m 0 lwWm 9•.... 0. Conn MAUD 1/22186 0Y...A /a0 nr4a..wY., cow •- N9•IIA : ;. a.,•.o 9 •m _, t� d Z W Q S ET ✓A�y RESTAUAA4 r' — Sire DR,.* SYlacC 9`\ Fti �F (�p1L N9 k o MARKET BASELINE ROAD HAPP! VALLEY RESTAURANT Michael C. Tan Located: 7203 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA Property is currently Zoned: TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL Zonirc of adjacent property is: North: T V.P.0 Medium Density Residential South: T.V.P.C. Medium Density Residential East: T.V.P.C. Medium Density Residential Nest: Low Density Residential APN 201 -001 -26/27 By: R. Alcorn 1/14/08 111 /Q 1 CYPYrr rY�.. w,.r....A1rY.Y1,.../r11�.Y MPUCAK " Pft A{D "ar Wfn#M UFN TF Db.1..1: 1101 + L�Sbino s�Yy ' 1. iT1!(t) Or IKOMM OOSALL Oruza" GTIBO PLACL 1907 Co11C1tioua1. Priority 919 � D..Sw.f4A1 Q y 117. S �� t MA" OF A111KJ1MIW .Y.. A.wu Ok Aw O.Y ClLA!^_PtClhl i TMM w KI ASAc"oKD Ati IK. 111E CT 20 ♦ IIUY, r IYr.s S . , 1 lwl.. r►i.� -ILir �1 tyr !Oid DL.m Ave. Suit. Z. cpy w OP C.& G"M KOK li AA/4«I ..r. Ir 7d .� r.1..4.w/ M ....Ar Srr rw r Aw. r Y A.wfA6v r . ter.n rI 11 VAK O/CAIIOb" C Crryt/3W1�^+AM1nn Orw 12 /ln/07 w..rr 4L'*,* rr.rr.rr APi11CAIlOP1 r� 7tANlloIOR IS SYAK W CAI110OLA C" r Dr r. Y 4 YT1 tirY y1.1 YI r.V w wr..Y n..ln �Yw4.. w r Yr. 1b Y b Y.y rY .YYrw Y .+Y tiwlYr �YY �ryrbw.6..r.Y✓. W.w A�wwr Y�rY.�irr.�r.Y. wwYp MM.Mr.Sre.TAi LAr,P.D.It 0.0.4 A..A.+ Q&.dwr L3 P�l O w�+wiD__12L29LfL" _ 13 he 00 y SHSLLy 3 i SHELLY'S Located: 8038 Haven Ave. /E Rancho Cucamonga, C.A. Property is currently Zoned: GENERAL COMMERCIAL VIMPIA ogee wimaRy ceNree Zoning of adjacent property Ss: North: Flood Control /Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 17 South: Industrial Specific Plan /Haven Avenue Overlay District East: Terra Vista Planned Community/ Community Commercial Went: Flood Control /Industrial Specific Plan/ Subarea 17 APN 1077- 661 -03 By: S. Ramirez 1/14/88 FOOTHILL D L V D i w Q Z w I 1 �F.Y�..nV VwY, m4fK ►.lY7 I KVAI Y OF MUC MW J 2 Tmm OF T&Awc ohm r.1gy Y Y Y l.fA..Ar y . s...Y M M.I.+Ir .O M.Mr.rrrF....1.Y S..MY./ 12 STATE Or CAVCM\ Cog Y/ Ilr Sl.....ilr flw Yf -S�ff _. •+.rw..tiw.a�rY.r.w�..r.. .... r.n.m.YY+r.4. YIr..\. +.. �. .\.Jr..M�....w.r.YrFF.q Y..... M..V.Y..Y Y..V... .. `....AO Y. I. ..Nr.... ..9..�Y...... Y.�. rw1 ..1 r.Y..V.Yr.F V..Y .. w.V ...�.Yrw.....w ..YF..Y Y....Y+YrFYry.... W.I Y✓•.... rr.�rYr.r...Y...r.� w Y\✓...rr y. Yr .rY..r..+wY..w.�......wr.F...�. �............Y n. r EMI y It M 51011IKJ.MM R �P.itarut ///Q L IW APPLYAT10ES'ry TL#JdM Oe M STATE a C1JlOe4A CYrf 41 y. F... �.. .r.T...r...�.4...Y...Ww.F.....i 1.1 \YY..r ... �.Y.\.M\..w. Yw. .�.. Y Y ..Y.•r.. YYI\ M �...i. Y \.W .Wr ....Yy 0 ..I Y r.\ r...M.Y. n .wY. QNMwft` O.fsMSS.g PffD.Er1a..1W.O* AMed.& Q b> ja n.M O saes rule —Ia-SM ORIENTAL HOUSE Located: 8038 Haven Ave. /A Rancho Cucamonga, C.A. Property is currently Zoned GENERAL COMMERCIAL VIR6:NIA tAR6 WINERY cawraL Zoning of adjacent property is: North: Flood Control /Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 17 South: Industrial Specific Plan /Haven Avenue Overlay District East: Terra Vista Planned Community/ Community Commercial Nest: Flood Control /industrial Specific Plan/ Subarea 17 APN 1077- 661 -03 By: S. Ramirez 1/10/88 FOOTHILL 0 L V b /y W z w I 1 s. sR FROM Eugene Gilmore, Captain sCommander, Rancho Cucamonga Station : TO asuren We u ... an, City Manager 0cs°ariO'0 i. City of Rancho Cucamonga t 3 . ' SUBJECT REQUEST TO TRANJ7ER FONDS We are requesting a transfer of funds in the amount of $1,230 from Object !4451 -1200 (OVERTIME) to Object #4451 -3900 (MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS). ?' 'fir• The funds will be utilised to pay for the (3) Protocol Converters needed to operate the city owned RMS /CAD terminals authorized in the 1987 -08 Budget. During the budget process, through an oversight, these items were not included. We have been operating to date with converters borrowed from the County of San Bernardino. X"2�. EG /Bz:la �aixr000 �. rn, % Jr • -- - I INTEROFFICE MEMO '• D DATE D December 17, 1987 PHONE �aixr000 �. rn, % Jr INTER- O►FICE MEMO DATE: December 9, 198 PRONE: 387 -3668 ►ROM: Edward O'Brien, anager Sheriff's Communications TO: Gene Gilmore, Captain Rancho Cucamonga Station SUBJECT: Protocol Converters (PAC Blue Boxes) When we installed the new RMS /CAD terminals at Rancho Station that were purchased by the City and to prevent any delays we used protocol converters (blue boxes) that had been purchased by the County. This equipment had been approved for purchased by thn City to support the RMS /CAD terminals but had never been ordered. The "blue boxes" have been on back order thrcugh PRC for monthes. We finally hope to receive the last of the County's outstanding original order of •blue boxes" this week or next. Please obtain a purchase order from the City for replacement of the three (3) protocol convertors blue boxes supplied by the County. The cost is 5410.00 each. When you have secured the purchase order, I will be contact FRC for you to order the equipment. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please do not hesitate to call me at 387 -3668. cc: John Futscher, Captain Sheriff's Communication L. Ray Rzrper, Captain Sheriff's Bureau of Admin. %6 r n' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Joan A. Kruse, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: SELECTION OF JANITORIAL SERVICE. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve John Bolin Maintenance and Janitorial Service for the performance of custodial services effective January 25, 1980 through the balance of this fiscal year for a contract amount of f.27S;ty. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: On December 2, 1987 the City Council approved the selection of American Building Maintenance Company for the performance of janitorial, and related services such as moving paper stock to copier rooms at the City's various locations. American Building Maintenance Company was the low bidder, whose references checked out, and which appeared to amply meet the requirements needed at the City's facilities. American Building Maintenance was provided with specifications to be followed and in two precontract meetings was given a walk through and direction of what needed to be done. The City was given assurances during these meetings that the contractor would perform in such a manner as to exceed the City's expectations for these services. This has not been the case. In the one month of service provided by the contractor, the City was required to report on a daily basis to the contractor those are -3 where service had nct satisfactorily been provided. Over the month of t''9 contract the sane reported drticiencies occurred over and over again The •,ork performance did not get better, and, in fact, got worse and American Builtiny Maintenance was given 15 days notice of contract termination on Friday, January S. In reviewing the inadequacies of this service, it was determined that a good portion of the encountered problems results from insufficient training of personnel and the inability o• City staff to directly reach the people responsible for the job being performed. As a consequence, staff race;,. nds that Lire City bypass the next two low bidders and contract with the John Bolin Maintenance Service. For Council's information, the next lowest bidder's references were unfavorable and the following bidder has the same structure as that of American Building Maintenance. It has proven to be extremely frustrating to 17 January 20, 1988 Janitorial Contract Selection Pago Two deal with a company which then directs the supervisor to contact the crew supervisor and subsequently tho people rasponsibla for doing the Job. In such an mu organization, the comnication of a problem oftentimes takes rver a week before it can be corrected. This results in poor service and requires tbr: staff expend a great deal of time trying to get it corrected. It is because of this that a contract with a more directly responsive service is recoceended. John Bolin Maintenance Service 1s a family -owned business run by husband and wife. Their grown children are also involved in the service and help In the supervision of team for which they are responsible. They have been to business since 1980 and in checking their references have some of the same clients with which they began and who are satisfied with their performance. The City has sufficient funding to cover the additional cost increase because of the budgeted amount required by the fora:r Janitorial service. In checking with the City Attorney, Section 3.08.230 of the recently adopted Purchasing Ordinance permits an exemption from tha bidding procedure for services when the contract does not exceed twice the formal bidding policy limit, which is $20,000.. We would be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding this. Respectfully submitted, Jim Hart Administrative Services Director !S ,r — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager v From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshi, Assocfate Civil Engineer Subject: Award and Execution of Professional Service- Agreement with Norris- Repke. Inc., to prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates for 19th Street from Zircon to Amethyst RECOME DATIOM• Execution of Professional Services Agreement with Norris- Repka, Inc., for preparation of Survey Plans, Specifications and Estimates for 19th Street from Zircon to Amethyst Street, for a fee of $56,400.00 to be paid from the Systems Development Fund. BACKGRO111WAWALTSI S• On December 30, 1987, a panel of professional engineers, including Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer; Jerry Lindqyuist, P.E. of Don Greek and Associates and Blane Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer acting as a non - voting moderator, met to review proposals submitted by seven (7) design firms responding to the City's Request for Proposals for the subjtct project. Prior to this meeting, each of the panelists had received the Scope of Service and Credentials for the seven (7) different design firms, for a careful review. Mr. Lindquist, acting as Project Coordinator for the City, was charged to prepare a detailed evaluation of the proposals pertaining to the meeting of the requirements stated in the Request for Proposal Letter. Mr. Llndquist's Statement of Qualifications is attached for Council review and consideration. The review panel confirmed Mr. Lindqulsts report anending such that the two firms listed as having inadequate insurance had indeed met the insurance limits required. The ranking of the firms by using the various criteria listed ty Mr. Llndqulsts report was as follows: Ranking by Strength of Poposal Associated Fee's Norris -Repko S 56 4G0 W11dan 80,601 /9 4 CCSR January 20, 1988 Page 2 Walnscott 94,891 Robert Bein Willlrm Frost 111,850 ASL 8[,722 Linville 54,830 Ramco 144,500 The firm of Norris -Repke 1s recommended as the design fire for the project both on the strength of the proposal and upon the fee proposed. Respect y submitted, r i R .pm Attachment Don Greek and Assooiates CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS December 28. 1987 C 14Z .9 �! 0 V)4 Clrl OF RANCHO COCA ONaA 9320 Baseline Drive P 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTENTION: Mr. Blano Frandsen SUBJECT: B, °aluation of Proposal for Improvement of 19th Street, Zircon Avenue to Amethyst Street (1817) Dear Bleno, We have reviewed the proposals received for the subject project. Proposals were received from Norris- Repke. Inc., Linville -Civil Engineers /Lend Surveyors, Inc , L. A. Nainscott and Associates, Inc.. RAMOO. ASL Consulting Engineers, Mildan Associates and Robert Bein, NSlllen Frost and Associates. Our evaluation of the proposals received is as follows: SUMMARY EVALUATION CRITERIA NORMS- Rt:!fE LINVILLE L.A. nAINSCOIT Project Teem Adequate Questionable Adequate (Note 2) Experience Adequate Adequate Adequate Subcontractors Herren Sfeche, PE Hills Assoc, Cal -Nest La Belle - Marvin Lawrence Consultents Eisenhart Lawrence Eisenhart Eliot /Mahoney Michael Brandmen Associates Method of Accomplishment Adequate (Note 1) Questionable Adequate (No to 3) Schedule Adequate Questionable Ad equate (Note 4) Insurance Adequate Inadequate Inadequate (Note 5) (Note 6) h 4 2420 N.01UNDAVf., • aURaL • &%NTA ANA.CA,2701 • (YS41m.Om ,.„ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA _ December 28, 1987 Page Two CRITERIA NORRIS -REPKE LINVI= L.A. 4AINSCOTT Rescurce See Fee Not Refa -enced Adequate Requirements SUMMARY EVALUATION COhTINM CRITERIA AAMCO WILDAN A& ROBERT BEIN WILLIAM FROST Project Team Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Experiences Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Subcontractors Johnson -Frank Labello- Marvin Labelle -Mervin Labelle - Marvin and Assoc. Michael Basmaciyan Inc Braadman Darnell, Inc. Wolden Associates Engineering John Cutler and Associated Associates Soils Engineering, Inc. Method of Questionable Adequate Questionable Adequate Accompliahment (Note 6) (Note 7) (Note 8) Schedule Adequate Adequate (Note 9) Adequate Insurance Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Penource S- ;arate See if See Fee See if Req'jiremonts Proposal Submitted Submitted With Fee With rnn rzo7nEs Note 1 Norris- ROpke. Inc shows a very clear understanding of the work required, especially CALTRANS requirements. Note 2 Linvilles proposal dots not provide the address or phone n=ber of the subconsultants. Note LLIvillee Proposal does not demonstrate a clear understanding of all requirements. .?;L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAROMA December 28, 1987 Page Three Note 4 Linvill2s schedule is unclear. A bar chart would ba better. Note 5 Linville has SI.000.00O office liability but only 5250,000 Professional liability. Note 6 Based on their Proposal description of work it in uncertain wethar RANCO is familiar with all ti.e requirements. especially CALTRANS. Note 7 Aildan Asoociates proposal demonstrates a very clear and complete understanding of the requirements. Note 8 ASL'a proposal is over 9/10 resumes and related experience. Their proposal does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirements. Note ASL's proposal refers to an attached schedule. This schedule was not attached to our copy of the report. Fiacommandatiosa Based on the evaluation results, excluding fees, it is recommeded that Nildan Associates or Norris- Ropke. Inc. be selected for the project. Nildan Associates proposal did not indicate whether the resource requirements we submitted with the fee or not. If Nildan Associates did not complete theiro r Proposal by submitted the resource requirements with the fee then it is recommended that Norris- Ropke, Inc. be selected for the project. Very truly yours, DON MR ASSOCIATES Qerald J. LSndqulaC Partner OJL /sl 122887/C25!L -1817 �?3 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Slane M. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 6 for Etiwanda Storm Drain with Associated Engineers for work on an hourly basis for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 being funded by the Drainage Fund for the Etiwanda Area RECONOOATION: It is recommended that City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 6 for Etiwanda Storm Drains with Associated Engineers for work on an hourly basis for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 being funded by the Orainage Fund for the Etiwanda Area. BACKGROUND /TJ&YSIS• The acquisition of right -of -way from the Victoria Basin to a point north of the Foothill Freeway Corridor was recently provided for by purchase from the Thompson family. The purchase also allowed for temporary construction easements adjoining the storm drain right -of -way to be available to the City to allow for construction access for the project up to December 31, 1988. Recent Basin Studies have temporarily limited the discharge to the Victoria Basin via the Etiwanda Storm Drain until basin Improvements can be made at the Victoria Basin. To provide for the construction to occur through the period provided by our construction easements adjoining the first reaches of the storm drain, it is advised to package that portion of the project from the Victoria Basin to a point north of the Foothill Freeway Corridor. To do this requires a repackaging of the project plans, specifications and estimates for a phased construction. This work is proposed to proceed on an hourly basis at a not to exceed amount Of 535,000.00 bringing the contract total to $136,329.00 and is noted to be paid from the Drainage Fund for the Etiwanda Arc+ (Fund 19). Respect y submitted, � G RHN: am Attachment: Contract Change Order No. 6 v?y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHARGE ORDER Etiwanda Storm Drains 1- 1,1- 2,2- 1,2 -2,2 -3 Account No : January 8, 1988 OR T0: Associated Engineers 316 'E' Street Ontario CA 91761 ng neer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. in Contract Price In Contra t Price Package Phase I Project for Construction 1. Revise plans for temporary end of Phase I Construction. 2. Revise Specifications for shortened or amended project. 3. Revise project estimate for shortened project. Work on an hourly basis not to exceed TOTAL: $15,000.00 running requires a phased construction program in lieu of a totel project construction. It is also advised that we proceed wfth this project this calendar year, from Victoria Darin to North of Highland Avenue period for to complete construction prior to December 31, 1988, the which temporary construction easements have been provided. The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) Thousand and no /100 (Increased) by the sum of: Fifteen Dollars (SIS,DOO.00 —�- The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: One Hundred hir Six Thousand Three Hundred Twen Hine and no /100 Dollars (5336.329.00 The Contract period provided for completion will be (Increased) (Dec reasea) (Unchanged) Days This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: - -iusse ague C y ngii�jnee� -- e Accepted: �� a ng neer - -LL-�- ate Approved: au y n agreement dated: June 5, 1985 " C�0wr85 57any cna a.f' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � 4� STAFF REPORT. x DATE: January 20, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil EngineerS� SUBJECT: Award the Etiwanda Avenue Cobbleston: Curb and Gutter, Phase I, Improvement Project located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue from Victoria Avenue to 263 feet north of Victoria Avenue, and on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue from 10 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing to DeAreond Construction for the amount of $28,238.50. PECOMEIOATIOH: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for the Etiwanda Cobblestone Curb and Gutter, Phase I Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, DeArmond Construction for the amount of $28,238.50. BACKGROUND /ARA1.YSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on Thursday, January 7, 1988, for the subject project. DeAnmond Construction is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $28,238.50 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $27,000.00 Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Res;j"11,y submitted, w RNM:SA:jh Attachment cc: Purchasing a6 �} Q a ;§S 2 8 a s �§. §| § ! n § ■ § E§k « B ( ,; m ®w.■ , § � n@ a a m sea ■ a 2 ■�; . - . . � ■ w § § # \ |.3» d ; § / }\ STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Accept the 'Construction of Traffic Signals at Three Locations' improvement project' with new traffic signals at Base Line Road at Alta Cuesta Drive, Base Line Road at Amethyst Street, and Archibald Avenue at Ninth Street, and with traffic signal controllers installed at Base Line Road at Carnelian Street, Base Line Road at Archibald Avenue, Archibald Avenue at Arrow Route, and Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue as complete, release bands and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completioin' and approve the ft^sl contract amount of $145,795.00. RECOMIEIRYITION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Construction of Traffic Signals at Three Locations improvement project as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion', and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $142,586.00 and accept the 103 Maintenance Bond in the amount of $14,580.00 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $7,289.75, and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $71,293.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $145,795.00. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved Fl ens and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is $145,795.00 which includes 3 minor change orders for additional sidewalk ramps, and pole, sign and striping modifications. The original amount approved by Council was $156,844.60. Respectf 1 s bmitted, RHM:SA:jh cc: Purchasing a7 I I RESOLUTION lA, g '3 — Oa A RESOLUTION OF THG CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FCR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THREE LDCATONS, LnCIITEO AT BASE LINE ROAD AT ALTA CUESTA DRIVE, BASE LINE ROAD AT AMETHYST STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT NINTH STREET, AND WITh TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS INSTALLED AT BASE LINE ROAD Al' CARNELIAN STREET, BASE LINE ROAD AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT ARROW ROUTE, AND ARROW ROUTE AT ETIWANDA AYEr.UE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements fcr Construction of Traffic Signals at Three Locations hovo been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion Is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. .?F CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel gap 9180 located south of Ninth Street and Nest of Hellman Avenue submitted by Landco Financial Corporation 1EC014MENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9180 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis/Background Parcel Map 9180 was approved by the Planning ,ommission on February 26, 1986, for the division of 6.47 acres of land into 3 parcels in the General Industrial OtvelcpXent District located south of Ninth Street and west of Hallman f,-enuo. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. Res 11 submitted, RHM:LB:jh �- Attachments 36 ti aiC.� RESOLUTION NO. g? — 0.30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NLMER :180 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 9180) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap Number 9180, submitted by Landco Financial Corporation and consisting of O parcels, 'ncated south of Ninth Street and west of Hellman Avenue, was approved by , a Planning ro®ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 91CO is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Nap; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of tiv: final mop by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Nap Number 9180 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. I--r�- 31 9 >1 sect - vacavr z o I '• , PARCEL 1 PARCF•L 2 PARCEL 3 S +J Al lu. ti J W 1 �CM�• • V CITY OF Nub RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 PARCEL MAP 9180 ENGWEERII G DNMON EXHMM. r. � Y. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 e T0: Ciy Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for CUP 87 -07 located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malvern Street submitted by Qualiy Development Company. RECC*VMTION It is recommended that the Ciy Council edcpt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the Ciy Clerk to sign said agreement. AW.YSIS/BACKGROUHD CUP 87 -07 located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malvern Street, in the General Commercial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 12, 1987. The Developer, Quality Development Company. is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $17,400 Labor and Material Bond: $ 8,700 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the Ciy Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Mater District. Res ft y bmitted, F M:LB:jh Attachments 3.3 .A RESOLUTION NO. VS-03/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND :MPAOVEKNT SECURITY FOR CUP 87 -07 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cu vmonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreew.ot executed on December 12, 1981, by Quality Development Company as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally locate on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malvern Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement nd ubject to the terms thereof, is to be done in m e with development of said real property as referred to Planning Coaeisslon, CUP 07 -07; and WHEREAS, said improvement Agreement is secured and accospanicd by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the sax are heresy approved and tho ' or is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 311 J ARROW ROUTE I ' O cur 8Z-07 ( F,4,. �t a IAO Wt ©/ Ac C�O • un t y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WGUMMMG DIMON ST yM. SAUNA ST N rnx- TM cur 87 -07 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r DATE: January 20. 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector �t!- SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 10076 located on the south side of Bagyon Street, between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. RECONEICATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period his ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: DEVELOPER: Lightner Oevelopeent 390 Worth Euclid Avenue, Suite 202 Upland, CA 91766 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $12,850 N MGy sub mitted, :V lz' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 sc TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector—!9k';;r- SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 11626 located on tha north side of Almond Street, west of Beryl Street RECON JIDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: DEVELOPER: Ramona Savings b Loan 5334 E. Chapman Avenue Orange. CA 92669 Maintenance Guarantee Cash Bond (Street) $66,300.00 Rese::jh ect ly submitted, "V 41:u� a% 1 �r �j ,L s t' E= CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 �CJZ TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Punlic Works Inspectp! SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Band for Tract 12319 and 12319 -1 thru B, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue RECD MMTIOM: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee (ands Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended ano the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $125,038.00 Respe tf y submitted, r kHT-:—SMG:jh CZJ' N 1 4 n I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 no TO: City Council and City Manager �� FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12316.1, located on the south side of Base Line Road west of Deer Creek Channel It is recoamended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remair. free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P. 0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $45,830.^0 Res illy submitted, R131 :SMG:dIw , i 39 i� i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA arq MEMORANDUM '� � r O P 2 January 20, 1988 '> L9r! City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works lnspectQ-4� Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for OR 84 -13 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recuasended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $39,230. Background /Analysis DR 84 -13 - located on the south side of 6th Street east of Archibald Avenue DEVELOPER: The Barmakian Company 8560 vineyard Avenue Suite 510 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $39,230 Respectfu submitted, RHM:SMG:jh ya t RESOLUTION NO (g S -03a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO FOR OR AND ALMROR ZING THE FILING OFCANOCE OF IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETION FOR THE WORK i NHEREAS, the construction of public i roverents for DR 84 -13 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHERF&S, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the ny gineerer o s f San Bernardino sign noand file a Notice of Completion with the Co S// CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion IECOIIENDATION: The required street improvements for Parcel Map 8902 have been completed In an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $74,000. Background /Analysis Parcel Map 8902 - located on the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road DEVELOPER: Berry Construction, Incorporated 1921 E. 11th Street Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $74,000 Res t 1 ubmitted, Y.?- i RESOLUTION 110. 9S — 0433 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TIME PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 8902 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 8902 has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. `/3 r r J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 WX TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex DR 87 -05 and CUP 07 -07 (Industrial /Commercial) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 13 and setting the date of public hearing for February 17, 1988 RECOIMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt this attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 13 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described developments to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex OR 87 -05 and CUP 87 -07 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 13 and setting the public hearing date for February 17, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineers Report for the subluct annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. ResDeSt y ubmttted, RHM:JAA:sd Attachments RESOLUTION NO. (e D - 0 30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 13 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS. on January 20, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEP.EAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses or sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and de—sc-rT5-eTTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, res^gctively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained to said report 1s hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for— f�poses of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 1W at f. e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 13 for OR 87 -05 and CUP 87 -07 SECTION 1. Authority for Report_ This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the arras to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specificaticns The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was farmed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. V ■ Zone 2 Is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4ch Street from west to east city limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some Parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 13 is as follows. Zone 1 Total estimated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Existing District $2,070 8 52,070 • 5258.75 /year or 521.56 /mo. /tot Existing Annexation New District No. 13 Total 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,570.69 1.95 380,573 Total cost f assessment unit for year and month D x 5.3U • 5 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre — JW' 73"' Assessment shall apply to ea;h lot as enumerates in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagran. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled `Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. w -f V. SECTION 6. Assessment 'mprovements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel y for Zone t and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in e Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing to June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the revlous fiscal year wnich are to be recovered through assessments as required Sy the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts puh*,ie hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year to May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the inclvidual assesscents. e>e I Properties and inprovements to be included within Annexation No. 13 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 0: z: IMPROVEMENT ARE4S TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION NO. 1 PROPERTIES rr nk PROJECT ACREAGE v7 DR 07 -OS ,69 CUP 87 -07 1.26 'r. 0 ;. Total 1.95 r. IMPROVEMENT ARE4S TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION NO. 1 7' =,4 = Area S3 -fit v7 Maven Avenue 0 ;. Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Strcat 0 7` s :a� X.t a :UJ a yl�l� 7' =,4 = ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. s ANNEXATION NO. 13 6TH STREET S/ /E H. t M M J ti M M • r r • / r•� 1 u unY I 0p r `, � r a 1 .• . • Y If M1 rY la ryr �VIY •• M f r •[44awYX .�.. ..� � as .1 CITY OF RANCHO C[ICA�VIOI�A ENGINEERING DIVISION 11 \ -11 I•n ' VICINITY MAP page M M M ' IR i b n M I•. M M M 1 u u .• as t a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 13 5 ITE' lar t c ew& ; of Ac q 1 u • Y/l ne Igt7r:ao At! yn _� SALfNA ST. CITY OF RANCHO CUGLV10iiNGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ' T un ' VICINITY MAP 11 \,ll ST page RESOLUTION n0. q O - D 3C-5 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ri CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, : AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION ND. 13 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THEtETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follow:: SECTION 1. Descri ion of Mork: That the public interest and convenience requ re and—ft-11 t e n en ton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located JIM roadway ray ht—and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation No. 13 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3•. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplate? worE in t e op n do or sa ty ounc is of more than total or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makas the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain •Map of Annexation No. 13 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3- heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. •, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. $ Z .y RESOLUTI04 PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution o. as approveo the report of the engineer of work which "..port - indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 13, Landscape Maintenance District No. 30 is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected of LFe same— ITme—a—nUin LWe—same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECT104 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on February I3; I'91W at t e our of I� n the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons havino any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause wh/ said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to 1drntlfy the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections wilt be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the omier of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propose — shall be cone ano ca" lea through n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the Stat_ of California. SECTION S. Publication of kesolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuan to Section 61961 of e Goverment Co4e. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The OaaI Re art, a newspaper of general circulation published to the City of Ontar of , Californla, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. S� -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT °v ` DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex DR 87 -05 and CUP 87 -07 (Industrial /Commercial area) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I as Annexation No. 36 and to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 9 and setting the date of public hearing for February 17, 1988 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Rf,orts for Annexation No. 36 and Annexation No. 9 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described developments to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, respectively. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's lntcnt to annex OR 87 -05 and CUP 87 -07 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 36 and to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 9 and setting the public hearing date for February 17, 1980. Also attached for Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the subject annexations. Respec 1 submitted, RHM :d s ' Attachments ENIJ F k RESOLUTION NO. 4q S " D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ?MCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 36 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. 1 WHEREAS, on January 20, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file w!th the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Lands'.aping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and fired with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report 1s sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1: That expenses of—aia —work and ofethe9incidentaltexpenses to connectionctherewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and de—sc—rTb—eTTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land elthin said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed land in SECTION 3: taDistrict insProportion to then estimated ibenefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby Preliminarily approved and confirmed. Report for EtTpurposesaofsall shall stand as the proceedings, and pursuant to, the Proposed district. M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 36 for DR 87 -05 and CUP 87 -07 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Olvision 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council. has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditl0ns of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4, Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improveuent construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit to this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, Commercial and institutional landeinsindustrial, commercial the city. cal and has institutionalmareas that derives the acre same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District 1 is shown below: 1, S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamp Size* y� s Annex New Lamp No 36 Total 5800L 444 0 444 9500L 485 0 485 16,000E 16 00 146 22,ODOL 4 27,500L 6 0 6 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Haint. Cost 5800L 444 X $ 8.93 X 12 • S 47,579.04 95DOL 485 X $10.16 X 12 59,131.20 16,000L 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,000L 4 X $13.84 X 12 664.32 27,500 6 X $15.31 X 12 2,939.52 Total Annual Maint. Cost $112,633.44 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 15,867 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 3 Total Assessment Units 15,870 y„ Z. 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance 1051 5112 633.44 a 57,10 /year /unit No. o n s n s r c, 15';70 Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in S:ctlon 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Light.ng Maintenance District No. 10, Annexation No. 36. These diagrams are hereby Incorporated within 0e text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3 City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a 1ablic hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individucl assessments. 3 EXHIBIT •A• s� Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 36 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. No. ot. Lam s to bs to be� Anncxed Pro ect Acreage -OnTi- 537 `- 45o0L ii,DOQt— Z£Z1,buuL Zone 1 Zone 2 OR 87 -05 .69 1 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- OUP 87 -07 1.26 2 - -- - -- - -- _ -_ _ -- Total 1.95 3 - -- - -- - -- - -_ ,4 a • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3(0 6th Street 5/TE • �/ tl f r1/f. M1. • i¢i¢i¢jjj rw rY i N j M� • �a w M1. i1 j1 1 • � u/� � • - r �i1IY r y.I !f M IY M1. j .n y iun U v 7 I.r V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA i T YI 7> lv im S ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. S& /�-s,rE —� ARROW XOM s! rOif N3 Q!f' ALPINE ST w s s ..J y/t of SALI&A ST. dos 0 v r2s es ��" CITY OF RANCHO Cuo"ONGA L c COUNTY OF BAN BMNARDINO r t I P f37- irr BTATE OF CALIFORNIA l +� N im RESOLUTION NO. C7 $ — �7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL1FMIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI5iRiCT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 36 TO STREET LIGHTING M4I147ENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, belrg Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as tulte"'ee SECTI.M 1. Des�cri tionn 4ork: That the public interest and convenience regu re an td f si —the inMton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamongr for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operatior includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wTEM roadway r gi t�- of-way enuaerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the C4ty Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 36 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10. SECTION 3. Description of Assessaent Dlttrict: That the contemplated work, in the open of Said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council nereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 36 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION: 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * nas approveo tne report of the engineer of work wh.Lh report Indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is i:ereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a t�Same me and in the save manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting to June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on February a e our o Pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention, mrotests must be 1n writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest mist contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act rf 1972: All the work herein proposes shall a one an Carrico roug nn 5Fsuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California desimnated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division IS of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section o e overmoen ode. Thy mayor shall sign this Resolution and the Citl Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date •ct for the hearing, at least once in The Daily R_epport, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, aiifo—rnia, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 6 3 P— RESOLUTION NO. �75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEILATIDN No. 9 TO STREET LMTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, on January 20, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho 1 Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with tt= :ity Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Councii for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as folloxs: SECTION 1• That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o ssaTcT work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and de`sc—rf6e-dT7n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within saQ Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION !: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sard-Kssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained to said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for t�urposes of all subsequent proceedtnos, and pursuant to the prof ^;ed district. (oY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 9 for OR 87 -05 and CUP 87 -07 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report 1s in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and H1ghw ys Code. State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light tr s on streets) asshownaanrtherLightingLDistrict Altasa Map cwhich tis on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street light:.rq have been prepared by the developers. The plans and :rreet lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approv^d by the City Engineering ordevelopm Division. Reference hereby entplanandtheassessmentdia e diagram for the exactclocation of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to thn sarre extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SCI SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be Incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment Purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will oe based on actual cost data. Street lighting Maintenance District No. 6 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light iMrovements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multifamily, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit far the operation of the District. landZone 2 is comprised of all Industrial, commercial and institutional eInsindustrial, caamerclai has that one thresame benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Ene cost_ No. of Lamps Lam° Size+ Pros Annex New Lamp N0 9 5600E Total 9500L 42 2 44 16,CC -0L 2 22,000L --- 27,500L - -- "° - -- `High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamm Size Total Total Annual Lam s Rate Mors Maint. Cost 95m 44 X S 8.93 X 12 2 X $10.16 X 12 $4,715.04 16,0001. - -- X $12.08 X 12 243.84 22,0001. - -- X $13.84 X 12 0 27'500 --- X $15.31 X 12 O 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost $4,958.68 2. Total Assessment Units: YM Assess Units before this annexation 346 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 . 3 Total Assessment Units 349 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost S4 958.88 S14.20 /year /unit No, o n s n str c —'3+1— " Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diaoran Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 60, Annexation No. 9. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessrent Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year In May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ' Zone 1 Zone 2 maid MINT "A" Properties and improvements to be Included within Annexation tlo. 9 to Street Lighting Maiatenance District 6: Assess, No. of Lacps to be Annexed Project Acreage Tn= 3d00L 9500L 16,00UL — ZZ,OOOC— 'ZT,3dij[ OR 87 -05 ,69 1 -__ ___ ___ _._ CUP 87 -07 1.26 2 7 ___ Total 1.95 3 2 M'. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION NO. q 6th Street �• Y 0 •I• . T 5 ITE M M M IY L M >r � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �> COU,YTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA w T )m � !rn[F• � I I t• •IIY I� • I I I 1 M } M M rw ) •w i w » u li 1 n w 1 IY L M >r � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �> COU,YTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA w T )m � !rn[F• � I I t• •IIY I� • I I I 1 M } i li 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNcmT10N No. 9 �siTE ARROW X0V E I e n 5� ROr. f. e 4 Q�j ALPINE SZ W 6 0 a i`r 1 AC Un J }' :511 1.129Ar l/L of SALlfJA SF. ao• t I/ O a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • •'� COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDINO BT /.TR OF CALIFORNIA 3 m — RESOLUTION N0. $ 0 - 03j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ARNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: UESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTIhG ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AHD PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landsceping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri Lion of Nark: That the public interest am convenience r —fie an t s e ntention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w t=hin roadway rigs enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 60. SECTION 3. Descri tIon of Assessment District: That the contempla ec,'in a oD n on of said y ounc , is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * F'as approvecl the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to salt, report is hereby made for all particulars fer the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. 12/ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collect at a semo c me an n c same manner as county taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which tim assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on February�I7— M, a e our o pr_ in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Basa Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having bny objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should no: be done or carried out or why said district srould not be forced in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work s herein propos all be done and carried ur T6 psuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION S. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Simon o e Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a neospaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, — California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 7.L ORDINANCE 110. 333 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITI OOUNCQ. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIM OMA APPROVING INUCSMrAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AFUDG1s4;NT 87-42 ADDING SZCTION G.6 TO PART III AND INMUDING "1@DIUM WATJ7lOUS1NG STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION" AS A FERMSTTDD USE IN PART V. SUBAREA 13 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (ISP) WHEREAS. on the 25th day of November, 1987 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recommended to the City Council adoption of modification to the City's industrial development standards to clarify and revise the Industrial Area Specific Plan regulations pertaining to rail service standards and "medium warehousing storage and distribution" uses. NRE:iEAS, on the 6th day of January, 1988, the City Council held a duly advertised public bearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Coda. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Gity Council has cede the following fimdings: I. That the amendment In warranted to provide con:ietancy in the General Industrial Districts by permitting "Medium Warehousing Storage and Distribution" uses in Subarea 13 of the Industrial Area Specific Plans and 2. That the Amendment will provide procedures to request modification of rail service requirements of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and 3. That the proposed ISP smendment would not have significant impact on the environment; and 4. That the proposed ISP amendment is in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council bas found that this project will cot create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 6. 1988. NON. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED: The pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California GOV =Out Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 6th day of January. 1988 12.3 Ordinance No. 333 t• rage 2 3 Industrial Area Specific Plan Aaandmamt 8702 amending Part III. Section G.6 and Part IV. Subarea 13 an lywu A- Cart I1I. Faction G.6 ahall be ended to read as follower "The above raferouced rail service development standards aq be amended or deleted on a site- by -aite xoia during the Development /Derign Review process. The follwicq must be determined by the planning Commission in order to authorise any modification of the rail service standard: (a) That installation of a lead or rpur track cannot be accomplished due to physical constraints on or adjacent to tbm project eater and v (b) Other ezistin0 or potential rail service proportion will not be negatively affected in their ability to acemanodate rail service activity ea a r,sult of modifications to the standards." B. Part IV. Subarea 13 shall be amended to include "nedium wholesale. storage and distribution" under permitted uses. 7y Ati I ORDINANCE NO. 334 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAM NGA. CALIFORNaA. ADOPTING TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 87 -04 TO MODIFY TEE LAND DES DESIGNATIONS FROM OPFICL PARR (OP). COMMERCIAL (C) A)-,D COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO OFFICE PARR (OP) AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) Ai70LVING A 71 ACRE PARCEL WITHIN T8R TERM VISTA rLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN NAVE! AVENUE AND SPRUCE AVENUE — AIN 1077- 421 -5. 6 AND 13 The City Council of the City of .Rancho Cucamonga, loan ordain as follovat SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the follouingt A. That the Planning Cocaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. following a public herring held in the time and uanner prescribed br, la, recommends the Community Plan text amendment hereinafter described. and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by Mar and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this Community Plcn tart amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community Plan tart amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, D. This Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2t The Community Plan text of the Terra Vista Planned Community is hereby mended to read as follows: 7-< w W5 < xa r} _� - a oM S c 8 LL xu �} o V)_ w< C H K W ` � u w zm�gl SE �■ � �- !� f |!! 2� I !�!$!t »1 :c5 0 � }� z: E ;LL !g|§ -£2 E § \ |]--- ! �ki.� 0 is b ! °1 9> \� ! � \ m }f ; f` ƒ k no }! p § \} }! !Ik ) ( _ kk ca � } }_ rL� � �� ■ �Z� $k . � e { }` ' f } \) kf .• . .f ; |< ƒ 5 �} `a < ) k z low k2 / _ ( } � / r � f ! � ! ■ ! § } } ƒ 2!7 ƒ ! / e !! ® _ ® • � /) 9 — � ! ® 10 / / } ƒ ) ��U§ / / £ ƒ / 0 / J {s 0 0 . 0 J J!)! , cl®s Vol a � s ■ V ■ 3 � � s � r i w s ; D_ � a rl m aW N C J C R�� y� y9��nn CC 9 °YOO pN�GLCY.N.��OCE °.y. nE y� A V C .. N .. A L L- �'m>.CA „w 0.9 Nno.`V F YNS�`� V � < 4 r+ N '� 7 n's WNEB _Na _ °max E 9 ° $ ,pO> °�Y�A_L Vp7EC_.C- sY >y�'co N'p8 C— V Y D O ~ Ca ` w u C p rN 12 19 16 i pM ��8 nyV` eroa� -�a�p a'. 7C, CVN� «w �roC ��O�6�$ y; gO1 cc � q� C U O'+ y V M r c V y $YON 6 0 A{� rq, Eg'N E LiC^LC Cry Y' p ygH CLZ`o �' °�E�A �9 appN pmm Oro` E C yr!Q-g�rn11 C-CYIDON ~C Y K V Orro �hro V h�� a�irXV «=. Sn Ts '^ �' 4 A 0 L ro N y «- Y I ro 25 q d2i oA °e L >�`op ipSd NA g C` q ro YC N Y V r Vrn�EY ;C�C 'Y vc Yyro -q -�v A A g Y n l ° ~ >` N u Y O e o c ,C.00= W * 2 N"22 O N O r j U mc 0 A ,` 7 c N VrL E..3Nro'" L9 .. L V Y y; M V x fm S 7 C Y< Q O A N O rn N Y l LE SLY Sro NYNCi.(A EE _ > C 6......- z ZuUinS�� ua`°E.A U = - � , . c EEE�EAAV —> u U. Mo L `ye O A N q u L N— N— V C L �� VVIc E YC 7L �j0 g nt �y „�uuN YY A Y N —pp `O..o0 Y ` r p Y l L 6 v U Y Y O N C < N < 7 7` C q yV c w �0 E t>-5 O= fi$ro-00 V Y j � MV ev� CZ C 31NN y 0. uA VL x> <Nt pp«ro Y.rur szs"sc c AYE CL � G yEC9 a- �aE gq CLO CW a Y .C > Y Cz 'u p «� FSgY O Fia VS;Eo «b'�2 O t2 9 5YC Q W N cc w n l,I. wz Egg„ 5� Wdl v O L N. Gj zci• N L a In � M 5 u< POP1 �1� w1 V 1 f f 10 nhf Plf V V n N'O n onw+ wince.. f N O h O b b P bPM�h N O b b NI`1�' N O O O O IV h O N N b P fy'�[ wlNh_n fbwlP ^bb hPf P�Ih VNh I.. O�PN��Ip U U < o <�ci J EE N L y d' H OS G� w _E °a y 2 9 U, z b S. O sAa o L m A Us =�tyL VI O IYi c) a vl a O O O I � b N O C 9 W N u Y V YI Y Y Y Y Y 02 ' 8 w ¢ V) q -y JS W x r L C O I LL <O l J < Yta n` YfY Y� w u��EEE U zooc��f b S. O sAa o L m A Us =�tyL VI O IYi c) a vl a O O O I � b N O C 9 W N .2-3 K "� y- w3J L oL ,tl GQGQ nq E sn =� o u n C■ Oo■ w u C�« C #q Y Sjr V`yLp1L �yyL Oi �' CJCyQ 6V`C{E�''pWp NYyQ� Y np�LY Nd7Yq CygY�O��'�11LQ Uuyq�S xV W6C7 y�(`N >U EsO� SL Nq('OI v. Y m COV CCVc= C=$bN�L'� C L"ANm L09�9 FN�Y.°. 7TC E_ 9 ° W Yppf'Y �1 �1'pw A L L. �Mr >•C d Ln �yrjL C" CC L GG 2:5 �= Im ` L N 00 C ([ &g— x[gAO��pgygst '3� C. >q•Z [Q. x`?pl� $. s�J W NL n`� N� 0 EAEh = tJC°nAsouui9�g2T "g4E 8 onL >y��„ LQ�AJ O� V9" C N.' :3 L Y L =A— L IU W Q Ly NL•�L sC2E Y{.Lhl;vp U.2 SLbasE 6 Y N Y =— L d—« W w u N« 2 V Y — y= Y� N Y Y> b W 9 N— C V N Y «y> A W Y= E W u N N xYx N>.> rr; •s E �$ h9 O > —o C9L °L.. A A CD O_ GL !; 9L @ d z C q,L,N o >f iL — off« W LEaov >u O� oyn Wq C r o gy YG Y w Y «° FLf W CLS W VSppp��, W g u«V C u Y Vb> -0=— a A� Nqy OV A 8« E t N> J Upp E C 8 ��iii111— y N • W> Y Y `.O n D° Y L v I C N y C Y Ly ° LL N Y EY L s `Y yc C ;^ C g s p « —` M ps�LLG s L« tY Eg2ENac «�Mr in °g`� 's�`� «p� BCa�bYE u W C9oy C NO C� LYj Y O Y u —L LL�yHy N�' — >� F L 9 C } C F p, y N 4 u 9 L n.Y. i n— Y E Y CL Y 4u1.0 al GC 1 7p °C.o.0 W- 4c o NECY q`Y� 4J 7 X W M w J3 U IUL) >NYNgL Y f YNUUNWA WL "UE ND k \ � ! �E! 2!2 }J) ! � B � � /k .! a! T ! � ! f ■ \ t Im k � } § ■ ! ! $ I& > lf2f /}2a !£!£ 4 } 3 ! ! !£ J7 $f cc �! ■ Rig |. irc .! J: S § C 0 } k � k ■ / ! / p k k � ! ! kk )) }! ! � �0 � ! � \ |f kk�} lam= }$!LL ■ ; k © � ■ § � �| | ; ■.§ ! �E f ■ |! }} WNW !§ �!; § ! € • k ■f £ kk�{.! ■! !!!� kk E k�J Jkl� § }) ! }/ £ ! ƒ k > k ! § � ! k k) } \! O ! ■ ° ON �o ol ,f; ■■ § . - • , )fk} ) - J ){ k }\ k ! § � ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT A DATE: January 20, ).988 70: City Council and City lianager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 86 -27 California Ftnisnea metals - Appeal or the Planning umm ss on s ec s ton requiring undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along 7th Street for a proposed warehouse addition in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the southeast corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street (APR 209 - 262 -13). Continued from January 6, 1988 City Council Meeting I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision and deny the Appeal of undergrounding overhead utilities along 7th Street. 11. BACKGROUND: The project consists of a 13,700 square foot warehouse addition as shown on Exhibit 08' (Site Plan). The project was conditicnally approved by the City Planner on September 23, 1987. The Conditions of Approval included the requirement for undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities on the project side of both 7th Street and Center Avenue as shown on Exhibit *CO. On November 25, 1987, the Developer appealed to the Planning Commission the Conditions of Approval requiring the undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities along both 7th Street and Center Avenue. The Planning Commission did delete the requirement for undergrounding of utilities along Center Avenue but upheld the requirement to underground the existing overhead utilities along 7th Street (Exhibit •D•). The Developer's _.ter requesting the deletion of the requirement to underground the overhead utilities along 7th Street is attached as Exhibit •E'. M CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 86 -27 - California Finished Metals January 20, 1988 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS: The Developer feels the cost of undergrounding the utilities along the project side of 7th Street is 'out of scale" with the cost of the proposed expansion. The initial cost of undergrounding the utilities along 7th S %reet will be wholly the responsibility of the Developer. However, the Developer will be entitled to one -half reimbursement of the cost of undergrounding upon future development on the north side of 7th Street. Staff does not know the cost of the proposed on -site improvements; however, the current undergrounding policy does not specifically exeayt projects based on the cost of undergrounding versus tive cost of the proposed project. The recent decision by the Planning Commission to delete the undergrounding of overhead utilities along Center Avenue did reduce the total cost to approximately 24% of the original cost. In addition, this figure will be reduced to less than 129 upon reimbursement from future development on the north side of 7th Street. IY. CONCLUSION: The undergrounding requirement is consistent with current policy. In addition, the Planning Commission did relieve the Developer of a rather large portion of the initial undergrounding obligation. Therefore, staff feels the requirement to underground utilities along 7th Street is appropriate and reasonable. RespWfy l3tt ed, Who .ad Attachments: Vicinity Ma (Exhibit "A ") Site Plan (Exhibit "B") Existing Overhead Utilities (Exhibit "C") P.C. Minutes November 25, 1987 (Exhibit 'D ") Developer's Letter (Exhibit "E ") Conditions of Approval Sip II .0 �_ MR/MiNPU: IWO i L�J - 7tn STREET J� rrrrr�rrgrri 1 r., s � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEEMG DIMON if 0 ...8f_ W 1- HPAFtSED NEW A Oi7i r Y TrrLE: S / M ALAN ExHmrl% �rBN i =i Q 4- I 9 U 4 -�c , � O t ✓AS W c 'F � G 8 O a y' U e rb � z � U � V � S ti lV W c 'F � G U O � U v U H. METALS - of utilities along 7th Street and Center Avenue for the development of a warehouta addition in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on tle southwest corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street - APR 209 - 262 -13. Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Chat man WNW opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Mitchell, representing California Finished Metals, 9330 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucarango, reviewed the reasons for their request for exesytion of tie requirement of the undergrounding of utilities. Mr. Mitchell relerenced that this was an expansion to an existing building, the economic costs, and also the surrounding land uses. Mr. G. Hemonower, General Manager of California Finished Metals, stated he was not against undergrounding utilities, but feels discrimination in the requirement for undergrounding in this project. Undargrounding the utilities would double the cost cf the project. r r24FT Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing Commissioner Chitlea addressed the aestnetic cancerns on the truck loading area and expressed her concern about dropping the regrirement for the undergrounding of utilities in this case. Commissioner Blakesley felt that the undergrounding costs seen to be out of proportion with th¢ nature of the modification to the building. Commissioner EmericL expressed the compromising position of undergrounding on Seventh Street but nor on Center Street would seem appropriate. Chairman McNial stated that in Design Review one of the problems was this was a metal addition, and there fo a policy in the City regarding metal buildings. Since this was an upgrade to the building, this metal building was accepted. With respect to undergrounding, a compromise might be made. Chairman Mchiel questioned Engineering if there was development on Center Street. Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, that approximately 3/4 is developed on the west side. Coasissimer Chitiea moved deleting Condition 10, the requirement of undergrounding utilities on Center Avenue, Commissioner Blakesley seconded the action. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, VKRICK, HCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY November 25, 1987 * * * * * * Planning Commission Meeting EXHIBIT wD* f >O GARY MITCHELL i ASSOCIATES R E 0 i I tl" tJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA LAND PLANNING ADMINISTRATION CIVIL ENGINFERG1G DEC 041997 - 1370 OAaELU1C, aURt 743 MNg10 CUCALIONOA, C.A f{At41�a� /ee December 4, 1957 41pR. City of Rancho Cucamonga .Le Ran OQUYJ nchooCucamonga. CA 91701 ATTNI BEVERLY AUTHELET CITY CLERK ' R& APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION RELATING TO UTILITY UNDERMUNDING FOR CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS DR w•,t7 Honorable mayor and City Council Members) On behalf of our Client. California Finished Metals, we are hereby requesting an Appeal of the Planning Cammleslon's determination to require the undergrounding of existing utility lines along the south old& of Seventh Street. California Finished Metals has been required by the City to Upgrade the frontage of Its industrial facility. (which was originally constructed prior to the Incorporation of the City), by Installing new landscaping, a decorative screen wall. and Cincluding screening no u f all root mounted equipment), as elevations, Part of a minor expansion to their existing Industrial building an Its southern boundary. California Finished Metals feels that the economic costs of complying with the utility line undergrcunding are quite out of scale with the economic costs which are budgeted for the completion of the project. And, even thOUCh California Finished Metals is quite willing to satisfactorily comply with all other conditions of approval which have been promulgated by the Planning Commission, this condition for utility undergrounding may have the effect of causing the applicant to reconsider the entire expansion program. Crry OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :4 t 1 )l 9/ PPlat. n it A &. 5,7 $ DEVELOP t 'PEAL Trr cu- �aacaaa: •+Y i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner PY: Nancy Fong, ,ssoclate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITION& USE PERMIT 87 -16 - Nuwcai - inn appeal or the Planning C(raf;sVen -dci5lon con onally a; proving the developcen of an 8.2 acre integrated shopping center consisting of four (4) retail buildings totaling 87,581 square feet in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APR 208461 -58. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of on ono se Permit 87 -16. II. BACXGROUND: The site area has a long history in development props. In October of 1983, the Planning Commission approved a 91,200 square foot shopping center including a supermarket and a Taco Bell fast food restaurant. The Planning Commission, in reviewing the time extension for this Conditional Use Permit in April, 1985, expressed concern that this master planned shopping center did not provide the required pedestrian and plaza amenities consistent with the City policies. The owner /developer at that tine (Lewis Homes) revised the master plan by providing such amenities as continuous pedestrian connections, plaza areas, benches, seating area, kiosk, etc. to address the concerns of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission in August of 1985 reviewed this revised master plan and approved the modification to this Conditional Use Permit including the time extension. Attached for your reference are Exhibits "F" and "G" showing the previously approved and the modified master plan for the shopping center. since then, the City adopted the Foothill Bouleva ^d Interim Policies in October of 1986 while the CUP had expired in April of 1986. Lewis Homes, the previous property owner, sold this site to Nuwest who later had received a preliminary review from the Planning Commission to determine the consistency of their proposed project with the Interim Policies in February, 1987. The project was formally submitted in April, 1987. Exhibit "A" is a chronology of events for this project. Q1� CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - 'JUWEST January 20, 1988 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS: In reviewing the proposed project, the Planning VWrs— on received public testimony from sever,.l residents in the surrounding area and also considered facts and evidence from the written and oral staff reports. The Commission report is attached as Exhibit V. The following section summarizes their considerations. A. Site Constraints: The Planning Commission recognized that ere are several site constraints that affect the design of the site plan. 1. The site has three street frontages, whereas, most shopping centers are lccated at a corner bounded by only two street trontages. Traditionally, the service area is oriented towards the rear of the property and away from the street view which is the case for this project. 2. The site is designated as in a flood zone. Hellman Avenue is historically a water - carrying street where excess surface water had reached the single family residences to the south in the past. This constraint would effect the grading concept for the site and would establish the required pad elevation to ensure that surface water drain3 towards Hellman Avenue. The existing single family homes to the south were graded in such a way that those homes abutting the middle of this project are substantially lower than homes on the east and west sides. The developer would have to take these existing grades into consideration in designing the required buffer zone. 3. The Foothill Specific Plan calls for a median island with predesignated median breaks. One of the goals in the Specific Plan is to deal effectively with the traffic and safety problems along Foothill Boulevard. In doing so, a raised median island will be established and access points will be limited along Foothill Boulevard to maintain the highest level of service for the roadway. Median breaks will occur at the Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue Intersections. Therefore, the project would be restricted to right -turn only access onto Foothill Boulevard. Project access :..uld also be from Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue. The existing driveway for Taco Bell would be eliminated. B. Neighborhood Meetings: A total of four neighborhood meetings were a ese meo ings were held to inform and involve the residents early in the review process. 93 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUNEST January 20, 1968 Page 3 1. July 1987 - At this meeting, the developer presented -5e pro ect to the residents who provided feedback by raising concerns and impacts cn areas of security, safety hazards, noise impact, traffic impact, visual and privacy impacts. Some of the discussions between the developer and the residents involved proposing mitigation measures for the buffer zone which included raising the perimeter block wall to 6 feet, dense landscaping with thorny vines to discourage anyone from climbing over the wall, eliminating one of the most southerly driveways off Helms Avenue to avoid through- traffic, and installing speed bwaps to slow surface traffic. I. Se tember 1987 - At this rating, the developer prese.: e e mitigation eea:ures which have been incorporated into the project, to address the concerns of the residents. Residents at the meeting stated that these mitigation measures were inadequate and would like to see an alternative site plan which eliminated the service drive in the hack. 3. October 1987 - On October 26, 1987, staff conducted an— nT formal— meeting between the residents that abut the site immediately to the south and the developer. The final design and treatment of the buffer zone at the south property boundary was presented to these residents as they are the most impacted by this project. Staff also invited a member of the Sheriff's Department to attend this meeting to answer questions regarding the issue of crime and safety. The residents reviewed the buffer zone treatmnt but did not have any consensus as to its adequacy in meeting their concerns. A detailed description of each meeting is included in the December 9, 1987 Planning Commission staff report. 4. December 1987 - The last neighbonlood meeting was neld on December 4, 1987, just prior to the Planning Commission meeting. The developer presented to the residents the reasons for having chosen the site plan as proposed. The developer stated that other alternative site plans have been considered, however, they weren't chosen because those site plan designs were not feasible for a viable commercial center. Exhibit 'C' is a detailed description of each of the alternative site plans studied by the developer prior to choosing this one. 9y Wk4Y CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUNEST January 20, 1988 Page 4 C. The Identified ^atential Adverse Impacts and the Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following is a summary of each of the potential adverse Impacts and the proposed mitigation measures. A full description of each of the impacts and mitigation measures is included in the December 9, 1987 Planwing Commission staff report. 1. Drainage Impart - The development of this project may expose people or properties to water related hazards such as floodino. Mitigation Measures o Install 19n foot catch basin on Foothill Boulevard. o Seventy -two inch pipe that connects south along Hellman Avenue. Result - Past problem of excess surface water }Todiing the single family residences to the south would be alleviated. Further, the City - scheduled capital improvement projects scheduled for completion within the next few years would further reduce the potential flooding along Hellman Avenue. 2. Traffic Impact - Increased traffic on Foothill au evar ; res dent concerns with traffic along Helms Avenue. Mitigation Measures o Raised median island limited access off Foothill Boulevard. o A traffic signal ultimately will be installed at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Helms Avenue. o 'No truck traffic` signs could be posted along Helms Avenue. o The street is already posted for a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Result - The raised median island with only one access off Foothill Boulevard would be able to move the traffic at an acceptable level. The installation of the 'No Truck Tev Fc' s gns an the traffic signal at the intersection a Footh 11 and Helms would at trucks from using the route of Helms Avenue and Devon Street as a shortcut. K �s CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUNEST January 20, 1988 Page S 3. Noise a Impact - Increased Noise From Surface Activity and Tr3flIc Mitigation Measures o A time limitation of 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. for all surface and delivery activity. o Trash enclosure areas have been oriented away from the south property boundary. o Signs would be posted for 'Employee Parking Only' and also for No Overnight Parking Allowed' in the back service area. o A block wall along the south property boundary shall be designed to attenuate noise. The City's Municipal Code recititres that collection of refuse that is adjacent to a residential district not occur before 6 a.m. Result - The summation of all these mitigation measures would minimize the noise level. 4. Light or Glare Impact Mitigation Measures o Light posts shall not exceed a maximum height of 15 feet measured from the finished grade. o All light fixtures shall have shields to prevent light from shining onto adjacent residences. o All tights shall be of high pressure sodium type (orange color) to reduce glare. Result - Any light or glare would be minimized, yet prov a sufficient light for security purposes. S. Impact - Increase of Crime and Security Mitigation Measure - The developer is proposing to re a pr va a security firm to patrol the site. Other mitigation measures as the installation of the block walls, landscaping, lights, sign posted for 'no overnight parking', parking spaces designated for `employee parking only' and time limitations of service delivery activity, will contribute to alleviating any potential impact. 96 a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONDITIWAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUNEST Jcnuary 20, 1988 Page 6 Result - The summation of all these mitigation measures would decrease the chences of crime. The Planning Commission reviewed all of these mitigation measures and determined that once they have been incorporated into the project, the identified impact would be minimized, rectified, compensated and alleviated. Thus, there would not be a significant impact as a result of this project. Therefore, the planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration for this project. IV. CONCLUSION: Based on the above - mentioned site constraints, the npi uf-Trom the neighboring residents and the mitigation measures proposed, the Planning Commission found that: the proposed project is appropriate for this site; the proposed site plan design is the best alternative given the site constraints; and the mitigation measures offset the impact of development to the surrounding areas. Therefore, the Planning Coe;sslon conditionally approved this project. Copies of the Planning Commission staff report and minutes have been attached for your review. Xel lly s emit ed, e ne r 68:NF:te Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Chronology of Events Exhibit '8' - Appeal Letter from Resident Exhibit 'C' - December 4, 1987 Neighborhood Meeting Presentation Frain the Developer Exhibit 'D' - Draft Minutes of December 9, 1987 Exhibit 'E' - Planning Commission Staff Report of December 9, 1987 97 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM r Date: January 20, 1988 To: Mayor Stout and Members of City Council From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. P.ougeau, Traffic Engineer Subject: Truck Traffic Restriction in the Vicinity of the Foothill Village Shoprping Center (southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Holimun Avanue: Concern has been expressed by the public and members of the Council, that current and future trucks serving tte stores in this shopping area will make use of nearby residential streets. As requested by members of the Council, the following indicates our authority to contr-il this nuisance: Truck Parking Current Municipal Code, Section 10.44, gives authority to the City Traffic Engineer to post any street for parking restrictions, including' truck restrictions. Therefore, the City Council need only designate the streets with which it is concerned and staff can post the appropriate parking restriction. Truck Travel On streets in residential areas such as Helms south of Hampshire and Devon east of Hellman, a truck route ordinance would be needed before imposing restrictions. Once the ordinance is passed and the street Posted. truck traffic could be controlled. Engineering Division is now In the process of preparing a Citywide truck route ordinance and It they are so directed by Council, can accelerate the work and have the ordinance presented to the Council in time to be In effect by the time the proposed project is completed. Res F ly submitted, � RHH :PAR:pam M CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS FOR CUP 87 -16 - NUNEST A proposed shopping center located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue. Date Chronology 2/11/87 Preliminary Review 66-77 -- The Planning Commission reviewed the conceptual plan.The Commission stated that all technical and design issues should be addressed and resolved through the CUP process. 4/2/87 The Design Review Committee reviewed the conceptual plan as requested by the developer. The Committee provided preliminary comments in assisting him to prepare his plans that best meet all City's applicable Code and Policies. 4/29/87 Project formally submitted. 6/30/87; 7/2/87 First Technical and Design Review Committee meetings. Identified major technical and design issues such as drainage, grad!ng concept, circulation /access, architecture, plaza area and pedestrian circulation. Revisions required. 7/6/87 First Neighborhood Meeting. The residents provided feedback by raising concerns on security, safety, noise, trash area, traffic and visual impacts. 8/16/87 Submitted revised plans. 9/15/87; 9/17/81 Second Technical and Design Review Committee meetings. Identified major technical issues as drainage, grading, and meandering sidewalk design at the Foothill /Hellman corner. The Committee stated that all technical issues must be resolved prior to Planning Commission consideration and the applicant should work with surrounding residents in developing acceptablc solutions along the buffer lone. A member from the residents grouped attended this meeting as an observer. 9/16/87 Second Neighborhood Meeting. The residents stated the proposed mitigation measures are inadequate in meeting their concern. They would like to see an alternative site plan. 10/26/87 Third informal Neighborhood Meeting. The final design of buffer zone were presented to residents by the developer. A member from Sherift's Department attended the meeting to answer questions en crime and safety issue. Residents found proposed buffer zone not acceptable. 0 9792 OV14 41ftbir 41 t i J Page 2 Date Chronology 11/2/87 Grading /drainage issues resolved to the satisfaction of the Grading Cowittee. 11/10/87 Planning Commission meeting. A representative of the residents request for continuation so they could all attend the meatlrg. With consent from developer, project was contirvied to 12/9/87. 12/4/87 Fourth Neighborhood Meeting. The developer presented and explained the reasons why they have chosen this site plan design. 12/9/87 The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, received all public input and conditionally approved the project. 12/18/87 Appeal letter received from a representative of the residents. 1/20/88 Appeal scheduled for City Council. 100 A1011VS0 CITY sow RANCHO UCOOt "A DEC 181997 Y d�91>Odlii�d�i9t4r�8 IIOO 'DD: CS1Y ODUNCII.: December 18. 1987 tie the people ggwe the decision of the City Plarming CcotdsSion meeting of December 9. 1987. This appeal is directed cm=d the proposal of the project on the lot at Fcod%= and Hell. The project is item "E' on the agenda of the meeting of the 9th. "==It $E7 -16 proposed by Mutest Developers. afgt -a ,1m CG 1 -0-I % othbir 0 10/ Aldo Capoeci 7 (IC, ) ✓LC-a. ✓na Lr �� /) ICLL4 HIV. :V., City Of 44M� Planning Commission C/o Ns. Nancy Fong City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Foothill village shopping center sac of Foothill Alvd. a 8o11aan Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: As you are aware, we were scheduled to Present our- site plan for planning commission approval on November 11, 1987. At the request of the neighboring homeowners, we asked for a - continuance of this hearing until December 9, 1907, to insure that all of the affected parties have the opportunity to provide their input. Additionally, we are hoping to clear up any misconceptions that the homeowners may have about our proposed development at our meeting with them on December 4, 1987. I would like to review with you briefly the history of our involvement with this site. In April o! 1986 we purchased the property from Levis Homes with the understanding that a site plan (900 the attached Exhibit "A ") had been approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. our indepth market analysis indicated that the beat use for the site was a Promotional center and not the proposed supermarket anchored center that had been approved. As a result of this analysis, we have been working with the city's planning staff to develop the site plan we have submitted for approval. In designing this plan, our objective= have been to: 1. Conform to the stated goals and objectives of the city's plan for the Foothill Corridors 2. Develop a center that would raflact the architectural heritage of Rancho Cucamonga; 3. Provide the much needed shopping facilities for the local residents while complimenting the existing retail trend on Foothill Blvd.; and -eJ64 1 -l6 df►rt� ac• r - -o -BB /o� City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Page 2 December 3, 1987 d. Create a shopping center that is successful for all of the affected parties and to mitigate as many of the externalities as possible. In order to achieve these objectives, we aseambled a design team headed by the Nadel Partnership. They are one of the most respected architects in the industry and h..va won numerous architectural awards. The Nadel Partnership has designed over 700 canters, includinT the one under construction at the northeast coma- of Baseline and Haven. In additional to Nadel, we have contacted Boyer Engineering, Carlson Landscape Architects, Reddin Security and Peter Pitassi of Pitassi i Dalmau, a local architectural firm. With input from all of our team members, we considered numerous site plans before proceeding with the site plan we have submitted for approval. Tho attached Exhibit B is a copy of the letter we distributed to the neighboring homeowners. Included in the letter is an analysis of how we arrived at the site plan we have submitted for approval. Within the constraints of this site plan, We feel that we have mitigated as many of the externalities as possible. We are in agreement with the staff recommendations regarding posting of signs anc. providing a security patrol. We feel that implementing these additional measures will reduce the impact of the center on the neighboring properties to virtually zero. We have enjoyed working with you through the approval process and l,.k forward to our continued association. Sincerely, NU MT CONHERCIAL D LOWNT CORPORATION Vice Attachments 2 CJVBT' /G ��` Cx�e/1G •� c•c•i- Jn -PLa 103 November 12, 1987 Re: Foothill Village Shopping Center SEC of Foothill Blvd. i Hellman Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Neighbor: No are the developers of the above referenced shopping center and we are writing to you to summarize our position on the itcma of concern to the local residents. Many of the residents concerns are with regard to our proposed site plan. We would like to explain how its arrived at the proposed plan and why we feel that It is the beat plan for this sits and the local residents. our initial intent was to develop a community center anchored by a major supermarket. Howeve,, after conducting an indepth narket analysis, we determined that the City of Rancho Cucamonga was in need of a "promotional" center. This type of center has stores that sell their products at a discount, do a lot of advertising and high volumes of sales per square foot. To make this_.tYpe of center work, we determined that it would have to be approximately 9o,000 square fast in cizo with three or four major tenants comprising 75,000 to 50,000 square feet of the center. In developing our site plan we had to work within the general requirements associated witl. a shopping center as well as several constraints specific to this site. The following requirements are essential to a successful shopping center: -Good visibility; -Easy accars; -Good circulation within the center; - Sufficient density of stores to attract shoppers and - Sufficient parking. The constraints specific to this site are: -The elevation problems associated with Hellman being the primary drainage channel for Rancho Cucamonga; -The existing elevation differential between WAMI Cj /o y property and the adjoining homeowners; -The City of Rancho Cucamonga•s dasire to have only one driveway on Foothill and to have the primary entrance to the center on Hallman and -The existing Taco Bell restaurant. To achieve our objective while working within the above constraints, we considered numerous site plans, all of which were variations of Exhibits 1 -4 as attached. Exhibit 1 is representative of our attempts to design n shopping center with two strips of shops paralleling Helms and Hollman. We reviewed numerous variations of thin concept, but there were several inherent flown that could - ^ —trot be overcome. one problem with this concept is that by _ eliminating the shops along the south end of the property, - the central focus of the center is destroyed. This central focus is critical to the success of the center because it attracts the attention of passers my and drove them into the parking lot. It is not until they are actually in the parking area that they tend to notice the shops on the oast and vest of the center. By building all of the shops parallel to Hellman and Helms, all of the shops have visibility to only 601 of the traffic on Foothill Blvd. Because of the depth and slope of the property, those shops or the south end of the strips would be virtually invisible tc traffic on Foothill Blvd. M additional problem with this concept is that in order to get the necessary groan leasable area cn the site the shops would have to rings frc. b01 to 1201 in depth. Retailers prefer 601 deep shops and it is virtually impossible to lease any space the- is deeper than 801. Exhibit 2 is representative of our attempts to design a *U" shaped center with the bzttom of thv "U" facing Foothill Blvd. Tile insurmountable problem with :hia rtorcop, is that only the shops along Foothill Boulevard havz any visibility. Visibility is imperative for a retailer to be successful, so any variation of thin: concept would be doomed to fail. The center would be virtually impossible to lease and the few retailers that :...ula lease space would soon be out of business. Exhibit 3 encompnsses the concept of clustering the shops in the center of the parcel with the parking surrounding them. While this concept is successful for regional malls, 4t han repeatedly proven to be a failure for smaller centers. once again, the insurmountable problem with this concept is that the shops along the rear of the structure would not havo any visibility on Foothill Boulevard. He recently purchased a shopping center that utilized this concept in the City of La Verne. The center was completed in 1983, was never more than 701 occupied and occupancy has steadily dropped to its current rate of 291. �Y#16ff !s� 2 !:7 s, After a tremendous amount of research, cite planning and consultation with the City of Lu Verne, it has become apparent that the only option is to demolish the existing stricture and begin all over. It is certainly not our intent to build a center in Rancho Cucanonga that will need to be torn down in 1993. Exhibit 4 is our proposed site plan and the one that we feel has the greatest potential of being a successful center. In developing this site plan we ware faced with the decision of whether to Guild the chops in the back as close to the roar property line as allowed by the City (within 15 feet, see Exhibit 5) or to create a buffer zone between the shops and the adjoining property. We elected.tQ.create tha buffer zone in an attempt to minimize the impact of the development on the adjoining propertie4. It is this buffer zone which seems to be the major concern of the adjoining residents. It is our firm belief that this site plan is the highest and beat use for this site. Wo are very much aware that any time a new development is undertaken, the effects of the development are felt outside the boundary line of the project itself. Within the constraints of the proposed development, we have taken numerous steps to mitigate the negative impact of this property on the surrounding neighborhood. SECURITY: Security has been of great concern to the adjoining residents. As a result of our many meetings with the homeowners, we have made sovoraY changes `^ Lessen their fears. In order to make the adjoining homes as inaccessible as possible, we have proposed increasing the block wall from Sts original three (3) feet to six (6) feet. We have also proposed landscaping the area between the development and the adjoining properties with "deterrent shrubbery" such as Nettle Plum or Bougainvillea. In addition, we have proposed a lighting layout for the rear area that will provide two foot candles throughout the area, which is twice the amount required by the City. We contracted Mr. Tom Reddin of Security Services, Inc. to study the proposed development. We asked for his opinion of the security risks of the proposed development as well as any recommendations to alleviate any potential problems. A copy of the report is attached as Exhibit 6. The following is a summary of the report: We are taking more security measures than any other development in Rancho Cucamonga. r A, 61ra' 3 /0(Q 2. The adjacent properties will be less accessible than they are at this time. 7. Someone intending to burglarize one of the properties would probably enter from a side street rather than crawl through deterrent shrubbery and scale two six foot walls. that The the buffer nzone rwill sbecome ea haven for youths l gang activity. The security consultant found that it is unlikely that this would be a problem due to the lighting and the accessibility of tho area to police and private patrols. In addition, the consu.tant pointed out that there are numerous places in the immed. ate area that-would be such more conducive to this type of activity. We understand the concerns of the local residents. Therefore, we have taken numerous stops to alleviate any potential problems that could arise from this development and to minimize its impact on the adjoining residences. We firmly believe that our proposed center will be as safe as possible and safer than the situation as it currently exists. An independent security consultant has substantiated our position and at one of our homeowner meetings, Hs. Denise Garland of the Rancho Cucamonga S. riffle Department concurred with the findings of the security consultant. NOISE: The local residents have also voiced their concern about the noise that- wilt be-associated with the proposed development. As with any commercial development, there will be some additional noise generated when the project is operational. However, we feel that the noise level will be minimal and we have taken steps to mitigate its impact on the adjoining residences. The difference in elevation between the properties will effectively insulate the adjoining properties from any noise generated in the proposed shopping center. The vast majority of the noise will pass over the homes of the adjoining houses due to the fact that sound waves tend to travel in a straight line. Additionally, any noise generated in the buffer zone will be deflected and absorbed by the six foot block wall and the mature trees that are to be planted in the landscape area between our site and the adjoining properties. The neighbors have been especially concerned with respect to the noise generated by trash collectors and delivery trucks. We believe that these obstacles can be overcome by proper management of the center. It is our intent to restrict deliveries and the trash collection to the hours of the day that will be the least disruptive to the residents. The residents have a /O? protection In that the city of Rancho Cucamonga has ordinances that restrict these activities. TRAM Because we have elected not to put a supermarket in the center, the problems associated with trash will be significantly reduced. We have provided an adequate number of trash bins to serve the projected tei.ants. Additionally, we are providing trash receptacles for the use of customers. Once again, we want to assure everyone associated with this project that we intend to build a quality project to hold as an investment. In order to protect our investment it is of upmost importance to us to keep the center properly _ maintained and free of debris. TRA)flCi Another matter of concern to the residents is the additional traffic the center will generate. As the Inland Empire in general, and Rancho Cucamonga in particular, continues to grow, traffic will be an ever increasing problem. The only long term solution to this problem is to design the streets , to handle the traffic as efficiently as possible. To help the city achieve this end, Nu West is contributing funds to future street improvements on Foothill Boulevard. The primary concern of residents with regard to traffic flow seems to be the vehicles using Devon and Helms to avoid the traffic light at Foothill and Hellman. We do not feel that our development will contribute to this problem because any traffic proceeding north on Hellman will stay on Hellman and access our center from there. The residents are also concerned that the buffer zone between the building and the pr .party line will become a thoroughfare between Hellman and Helms. With the proposed speed bumps throughout the buffer zone and turf block at the east drive, it is highly unlikely that this will occur. We realize that our center will bring more cars to the area. our studies indicate that 75% to 85% of traffic will come via Foothill and the rest via Hellman. We feel that the contribution we are making for street improvements to Foothill will more than offset any increased traffic the center creates. 1111 4-PLF! Throughout the planning and design process, the drainage issues have been of primary concern to all parties. The existing elevation of Hellman and its use as a primary drainage artery has dictated the finished floor elevations for this project. The residents have expressed concern that �N�BnC� the paving of this site will increase the risk of flooding to the nearby residents. it is true that anytime you pave an area you increase the runoffs however, in this case, the maximum increase that could occur (using a worst case scenario) would be four - tenths of one percent (.It). in reality, the proposed develcpment will actually help the drainage situation by moving the wator off of the pro "rty much faster and moving the rusvaff from the foothills through the area more effloiently. As londoanors in Rancho Cucamonga, we ar-o very concerned about the flooding issue. We have offered to contribute the money we will be spending on "band -aid" flood control measures for this site to a more comprehensive city -wide flood control program. Unfortunately, at _thA* time, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Is not prepared to itpiement such a plan. While we recognize the significance of the problem, we do not feel that we are significantly impacting it with our proposed development. Once again, we would like to reassure everycne involved that it is our intent to build a shopping center that we will be proud to own for the long -term. We feel that the proposed design is the beat possible use for the site and that the measures we have taken to mitigate the externalities will insure that this development will have minimal impact on the adjoining_property owners. nU P. R vice Attachments (6) u, +,a 6 G 0 109 EXMXMXW 1 fi �Tf� /t.L �GyO. SV7z PLW SCvgr=wS C' T Ageif C % i EXMMMXW 2 __{�iffidl ,81.E D sib' PLAN/ SC ANIp A ' Faor*4L V/1-4466 A*#4r..#o Frr-=;: EXHSSST 3 FavrHikG 6L✓a. I I u ii l SVrj' Pl.Al S*qFMa ;5' �rNiLL. ✓iI.r�s �,,, 4n 10 RqX-v#0 CCA"N/yq G/, 10 f 2� Ji � It _ ":I I t II11r 9 1 1 p I I I rr I r iIR i� �� = q •�t�° �, I I I '`III •Ik! I I -- �I -' 1 >. F II I. l ` 1 ren .3 S'. iS•� i. Ki �� iS l'�.sa 1'00""NiM{ �4 w •'' �• IBBPBI wuwn EXHSBIT 5 Fbdr#i" olw. finvrH14,4- vii cA�s A*x- #o //Y C-!3 0 EXHXMX ` 6 AN ASSESSMENT OF SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS FOR FOOTHILL VILLAGE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s. Prepared By. J. A. SULLIVAN, C.P.P. Made Fa. TOM REDDIN SECURITY SERVICES, INC. 3434 West 6th Street, Ste. 200 Lm Angeles, CA 90020 213/305 6116 October 23, 1967 //.e V' b/ J l., 1 I M,, TARLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Purpose and Method or Evaluation . .... .. . . 1 Residential Neighbor Concerns . .... .. 2 Evaluation of Site Prior to Project ... . . ... ... 2 Project Security Considerations ... .. . . . .. 4 Nearby Commercial Developments . . .. . .. . 5 Allsize Storage . . .. . .. .. .. 5 Photographs 1 & 2, Exhibit A .. .. ....... 5 Malachite Center .. .. .. . . . .. 7 F. 9tographs 3 8 4, ExhilAt A . . . . . . 3 Bank of America, at a . ..... .. . ... . . 9 Photographs 5 8 6, Exhibit A .. . . ..... 10 Photographs 7 & 8, Exhibit A . . . . . . . . . . I1 ' Michael "1's" Restaurant 12 Photographs 9 S 10, Exhibit A . . . . 13 Retail Center . . . .... . . .. ... 14 Photographs 11 L 12, Exhibit A . .. . . . .. 15 Pep Boys . . . .. . . . . 16 Photograph 13, Exhibit A 17 Former Cameo Complex 18 Photographs 14 8 15, Exhibit A . . 19 Sunrize Center . . . .. . .. . . . 20 Photographs 16 & 17 . . . . . . . . . . 21 Atbertsores /Builders Emporium . . 12 Photographs 18 S 19, Exhibit A . . 23 Crime Trend Analysis . . . . . .. . .. 24 Conclusions and Opinions . . . .. . .. 25 Recommendations . . . . . ... . . . . .. 27 A.f&af C �5 The Intent of this effort Is tno -fotd: • To offer an opinion whether a• not the Developer has reasonably provided for the security concerns of residential property owners immediately South of the Project site. • To suggest any additional measures that might reasonably be considered to further mitigate the security Issues raised by the residential neighbors. To aid in this study, the Security wraluat r. • Conferred with the Project Managers. • Ide. tined security concerns; of the residential neighbors. • Examined Project site plans. • Examined proposed lighting, fencing and buffering schemes. • Visited, toured and photographed the Project site. • rAwveyed and photrgraphed reasonably similar, nearby .,ommerclsl developments. • Contacted local law enforcements to assess crime trends In the area. j U7 It is oty understanding that the affected property owners have expressed concern regarding two primary security Issues: • That the Intended employee parking area South of the retail stores would also afford readily accessible and concealed vehicle parking for a thief Intent upon burglarizing one of the adjacent residences. • That the same parking area would become a gathering ?lace for local youth gang mambers and other loiterers. ito . • • , i•77#li3•i�l The project site Is approximately 7.9 acres of vacant land South of Foothill Blvd., between Heilman Avenue and Helms Avenue. Immediately adjacent to the South boundary of the veccnt land are eight single family residences each potentially affected to a greater or lesser degree depend - Ing upon Individual lot configuration and relative grade. The residen_es are presently separated from the vacant land by concrete block fencing, none exceeding six feet above residential lot grade. Due to the existing grade conditions of the vacant field, many sections of the fen- cing are wall below six feet on the project side. The existing fence offers little protection for the residential properties from an Intruder or potential thief. The only Illumination along the fence line at the present would be from the resi- dential properties. There Is evidence of frequent pedestrian traffic through tho field, between Hell- fl&N1 C16 «F man Avenue and Nelms Avenue not far from the fence line. There Is evidence of heavy padastrlan and possibly all terrain vehicle (ATV) usaage along the central flood control berm and at other locations within the field. There is also evidence of Illegal trash dumping on the vacant land at or near the fence line. PROJECT SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS S The Developer, In concert with City planners proposes the following: • Construction of a concrete block retaining wall topped by a screen wall to the maximum allowable halght, six feet .F above curb at the South boundary of the employee parking t lot. • This fence is to be located ten feet North of the existing residential property line and fence. • The approximate ten foot buffer zone thus created Is to be landscaped with maUCe trees and shrubs. • This buffer zone is to be further enclosed at either end by suitable fencing to discourage trespass. • The entire South employee parking lot Is to be lighted during all hours of darkness to an Illumination level that will meat or exceed City code requirements and accepted security standards. z ,t- The consultant surveyed newer retail commercial developments within the City along Foothill Boulevard East to Haven Avenue, West to the Upland City limits; along Baseline Road from - amallan Avenue East to Archibald Avenue. The purpose of the survey was to examine methods used to separate and or buffer other nearby commercial /residential developm +nts, and perhaps gain Insight that would enable this Developer to better address the security concerns of Fcothlll Village neighbors. The following comments will s-immarize our observations regarding developments that present somewhat similar conditions. e AIIsIze Staraee. Halms Avenue and Hampshire Street. The separation here is similar In that there is a landscaped buffer zone, however dissimilar from a security perspective due to the nature of the business and the height of the building wall that forms the South barrier. Refer. Photographs 16 Z, Exhibit A S ..I \" Y - - - ' I 4 1 (, Nearby Cc ercllal Developments (cont.) , • Malachite Center. et al. South of Foothill Boulevard from Malachite Avenue East to Archibald Avnnue. All of these commercial properties are sepe- rated from their neighbors I,, the South of an alleyway. The residential properties are se- parated from the alleyway by wood, chainlink or concrete block fencing ranging in height from approximately four to six feet. The fences are the only barrier or buffer from the alleyway. There is off -alley parking behind some but not all businesses. The irregular setbacks of com- erclai buildings abutting the alleyway plus the apparent lack of lightil.g fixtures could provide opportunity for concealment by passerby. erotectlon afforded the residences against tres- pass from the alleyway Is practically non- existent. Refer. Photographs 7 E e, Exhibit A .. 7 >>F I ti './'./ • . s o. tw . y� ■ V-3. FOOTHILL VILLAGE '* Nearby Commerclat Oevetnements (con%.) 4 v gjBk_pJ wm re tea. c. al, Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue, Southeast. The alleyway behind the bank and the next cluster of businesses East Is Improved and separates them from residences to the South. A parking lot behind the bank extends South of the alleyway and abuts a residence fronting on Hamp- shire Avenuo. Separation is by an approximate six foot concrete block wall on the residential property line. No other barrier or buffer exists. Refer: Photographs S 6 S. Exhibit A This alleyway continuing East to Ramona Avenue Is unimproved but does provide separation between an automotive repair business and undeveloped property, and residences to the South. The resi- dential rear yards are enclosed by primarily chainllnk fencing but are otherwise unprotected Refer: Photographs 7 S !, Exhibit A 011181jr6 1j 9 r: PHOTOGRAPHS 5 S 6, BANK OF AMERICA, e[ al 10 r. i AbIl CZ¢ i �r j.: _cam: ir,. �: eer!.. " � •` . C e hllehael -10 Rectal: ant. F.tolhlll Boulevard and Turner Avenue. ' The South boundary of the restaurant parking lot _ Is separated from the adjacent residences by a screen wall atop a concrete block wall at the ra- } sl.:ential property line. Between the stall and the parking lot is a buffer >> zone planted with ground cover, grass and trees. r Neither the buffer zone or I to parking lot Is en- closed. Judging from the number and typo of luminaires In place, the parking lot should be adequately Illuminated. For those residences directly South of he fencing, F protection from trespass would appear accepoable even without a second barrier on the restaurant side of the buffer zone. Refer. Photographs 9 a 10, Exhibit A 12 ,A71 ,r .. ■ si -77 Ail s: E Y 1 & FOOTHILL VILLAGE r'1 Ugarby Commerelal Devdaom•nts_ te°n + -1 a Retail CstYer, Ramons Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, Northeast. This recently completed commercial development abuts an apartment complex to the North. It Is similar to Foothill Village In certain aspects. Thus Is parking to the raw of the retail stores. A driveway from Ramana Avenue accesses this parking area. Again, the number and type or lighting fixtures present should provide Illumina- tion adequate to meet Code requirements. Separation from the residential development is by the rear wait or the apartment garages and the stuccoed walls that connect them. No otter buffering Is provided, nor would any fur- ther appear warranted. Rarer: Photographs it 6 12, Exhibit A lfi61, z8 14 �m A ir PHOTOGRAPHS 11 12, RAMONA RETAIL CENTER Y tA, A I , • P••p Rove. Foothill and Hallman, Northwest. This relatively new automotive parts, accessory and light services store adjoins residential proper- ty to the North. A wide driveway between the building and the North boundary allows travel around the store. There are no marked parking stalls In this area. Boundary separation on the North is by attractive concrete block wall at feast eight feet above the commercial property grade and approximately six feat above the residential grade. No other barrier or buffer 's present nor does any seem warranted. The height of the wall of fords good security for the neighbors. Refer: Photograph 17, Exhibit A C� 16 /3.L t • Farmer Gemco Complex, Foothill Boulevard North, East of Carnelian Avenue. Retail stores on the East side of the property abut a resldence on Estacla Street. Separation is by a concrete block fence approxi- mately six feet above the commercial property grade. While there is not sufficient space between rear of the stores and the fence for auto travel, pedes- trians have easy access from a nearby parking lot. This configuration provides less than ideal protec- tion for the adjacent home. Other residences adjoin the parking lot East of the now closed Cameo building, however, that area Is cross fenced with temporary security fen- cing. Boundary separation of these properties is also by concrete block wall. Refer. photographs 14 S 15, Exhibit A �iureliC2Z is �3S' A A. i FOOTHILL VILLAGE Zhx Co merclal Develoomnntf (cant.) • sunrise Center. Baseline Road and Carnel.an, Soutnwest. The racelving /storaga /parking area South of the main group of retail stores abuts an apartment complex fronting on Carnellan Avenue. Separation is by a low concrem wall varytog In height from one to three ;eat above the commar- cial property grade. The. a Is, therefore, no security protection or buffering provided. Refer. Photographs 16 G 17, Exhibit A of Nor }. 20 PHOTOGRAPHS 16 S 17, SUNRIZE CENTER 21 • AlbertsorWHalid rs Em rium Como ox. Bxwdino Road and Archibald Avenue, Southeast. The employee parking area East of Builders Em- porlum adjoins single family resldences. Separation Is by a concreto block wall sppro::imt- tely sit feet above the commercial property grade. No other separation or attempt at buffering is present. From a setvri:y view, this configuration does not prov!do a high degree of protection as the parking area is somewhat secluded and the barrier Is less than seven feet In height. Refer. Photographs le S 19, Exhibit A Al"If 22 �r i - - ... ,Jt• •:;�•y � �. � 'ice �t . t %+ fir. - • . - ��• 0'. fir. A, tE+ :y. W 3• J i i FOOTNI VI A . CRINE TR ND ANAI Yc',� Crime Prevention OfOcrrs at both the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Station and at the Sherilfs Public Information Office were contacted. Rrquested was Information regarding crime trends and aYouth gang" activity within the City. Alvi they were asked to provide statistical data that would allow area specific comparfsonn of aimLul activity before and after commercial deve- t lopment. As of this writing, only genoral information has been made available. As with most other large law enforcements agencies, the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department gathers and reports activity publicly by Reporting District (RD). These PD'sire made up of Census tracts and at usually too large geographically to assist In th;s type of study. One of the Crime Prevention Officers is attempt- ing to gather the requmted area specific data. If available In time, It will be under separ Ito cover. Generally, they advise the reported crimes are on the fncreaso City wide. This »: trend Is felt to be caused primarily by the rapid population growth In the whofe of the Inla-nd Empire and particularly within the City. Regarding 'Youth gangs^, the officers advise that organized, unwanted gang acti- vity Is not a particular problem in the City. In fact, there is Only one known, identified gang of youths and they conf(ne their activities mainly to a ieighborhood distant from this project site. Again, according to the officers, the City of Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the Sheriff for a high level of taw enforcement service. A level that provides a a ratio of officers to population that Is higher than any of the otter Independent Cities and higher than In the unincorporated portions of the County. `d I• 3 s 0 F r. r • r • - . IGN&I • In the present, undeveloped state, the project site affords no Protection from Intrusion onto the adjacent residential proper ties. • As proposed, the Foothill Village development will enhance security from intrusion for the adjacent residents. • The landscaped, enclosad buffer zone and the lighting scheme planned, more completely address security Issues than any of the shopping areas surveyed. • Adoption of any or all of the recommendations made below should further ameliorate any remaining security concerns of the rnighlors. • The Project's South anployee parking area, configured and lighted as planned should not provide convenient parking for either the day- time or nighttime burglar wishing to steal from one of the affected residence. • More likely he would choose to park on a nearby, perhaps unlighted street or other parking lot and not have to scale two fences to efrect his escape. • The South employee parking lot, again If configured and lighted as planned, should not prove to be an unusually popular gathering place for youth or "Youth gangs-. • There are many other locations within the Clty, some similar in design that must be considered more of an attractive nuisance than this deve- lopment. 2S /y/ Aftf Coq FOOTHILL VILLAGE w Gonclmlons and Oolnlont (cant.) + Beyond those already proposed and the several suggested below, further security measures to protect the neighbors would not seem warranted or practical. Yy t �J 21 1`ih8/1 C 3a_ a, iY lJOYA 9 LOUR While we have stated and do feel that the Developer and the City have adequately addressed security Issues for the affected neighbors, there we several suggestlom that can only Improve project -to- neighbor security. • Consider a vrlance that would allow South fence height to be at least seven feet above the Project grade. From a security view fencing entirely of a block similar to that behind Pep Boys Is preferable to the blocldscreen wall combinatlo • Plant and maintain the entire buffer zone with thorny foliage such as that known as °Nettle Plum', low growing Bo gain ville& or other similar bushes that are difficult to traverse. • Consider employing a private Sec city Service to periodically patrol the complex thus discouraging the loiterer and adding to the well being of merchants, atston:ws and neighbors. 27 IV3 M&T C 3! ��f ratl �i�::LJ..'nv.` Fn; cssa ONLY E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSRENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUYEST The eve opaen o a ' acre integrated s opp ng center cons s ng of 4 retail buildings totaling 87,581 square feet in the Cotmunity Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APR: 208- 261 -58. (Continued from November 10, 1987.) Nancy Fong, Associate Pit ter, presented the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea questioned if there was a detailed landscape plan and also if there was access from the neighbors yard between the six foot wall and tha other side of the wall. Ms. Fong stated there is no connection from the neighbor side to the project. The conceptual landscape plan shows a ten -foot landscape area from the project roperty line to the black wall and in front of the block wall is another five feet of landscaping. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Michael Roy, 350 S. Figueroa Street, #555, Los Angeles, CA , Project Director for NuWest Development, presented the history of the project. Mr. Roy stated this was the first project under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and that the developer has worked conscientiously and diligently with staff to mitts -a any adverse environmental impacts and concurs with the staff report. Mr. Aldo Capocci, 8249 Onyx Court, Rancho Cucamonga, representing the neighborhood coaaittee, stated they are not against the project itself but do oppose the proposed southerly parking lot. Mr. Capocci stated the neighborhood is against the block wall adjacent to the neighborhood, the elevation of the project, the proposed drainage, and the potential garbage problems. He suggested dropping the elevation. He also submitted photographs to the Commission showing problem garbage areas in the City. Another area of concern is the visual line into the yards and houses adjacent to the project. There is dense foliage vhich will create hiding places and potential safety problems for the neighbors. Mr. Capoccl also addressed the problems of noise and graffiti on the buildings and walls which will decrease the property value of homes in his neighborhood. Mr. Capocci also submitted a site plan alternative for Commission review. Ms. Marla Teran, 8248 Onyx Court, Rancho Cucamonga, resident, stated s )e is not opposed to the stropping center either, but is concerned with the problems of the parking lot Mr. Capocci addressed. Ms. Teran ou.ctirned the grading level of the proposed shopping center and felt tha solution should be to table this project until the flooding problem on Hellman is rectified. 006ir P 1RAF -1' DRAFT FOR elm.:, ,,,r., ru Qta-Y Mr. Mitch Cohen, 8220 Onyx Court, Rancho Cucamonga, resident, stated he wants the project but he felt that the neighborhood would be greatly affected by the potential crime. Mr. Cohen stated there is too few sheriffs to properly patrol this center. Ms. Sue Terdn, 8218 Onyx Court, Rancho Cucamcnga, resident, stated she is opposed to the shopping cem_r because of the intended elevation which would visually overpower the entire neighborhood. She suggested the dental or the postpenexnt of tho project. Mr. Larry Vito, 8226 Kiikwood, Rancho Cucamonga, resident, stated he felt some of the grades could be lowered, perhaps one to two feet and still allow drainage and make it more aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood. Mr. Frederick Chan, President of NuNest, stated they have made an honest attempt to recognize the residents' concerns. The developer has tried to analyze and mitigate the residents' comments and reach a reasonable compromise. They have net with the traffic control department, the sheriff's department and have addressed all issues concerned. Mr. Chan stated the residents understood the concerns of security and tkis would be mitigated by appropriate landscaping. It is the developer's Intent to work closely with the City and satisfy the residnnts' corcerns adequately. Commissioner Chitiea questioned Mr. Chan regarding the grade differential below Foothill. Mr. Chan responded it was a an eight foot drop from Foothill to the finished floor on the south side of the project. Commissioner Chitiea also questioned Mr. Chan regarding security. Mr. Chan responded there would be security during the evenings hours determined by the security company. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, stated there is a condition of approval that security be scheduled daily but specific hours had not been stated. Chairman McNiel stated that tho Sheriff's Department would also routinely patrol the site, specifically through the back of the site. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chities questioned Engineering if the pad was dropped one or two feet would it affect the drainage in any way. r✓RAF . Planning Commission Ainutet -2- December 9, 1987 /SAS DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated if it was dropped lover, it would create a uump condition affecting the neighborhood. Commissioner Chit'aa questioned the time frame for additional flood control facilities to be put 1n. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated the upper reach of Hellman from the Southern Pacific railroad north 1s scheduled for design and construction this year. The lower reach, the major program, is budgeted this year for initiation of design and phasing. They anticipate milti -year funding program to get this project through, two to three years 1s fairly optimistic. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that there has been dramatic grade improvements on Hellman and the elimination of the debris has greatly reduced the fl,,oding. Commissioner Tolstoy questioned if the Hellman problem was corrected, would the elevation of this project be any different than it is now. Russ Maguire , City Engineer, stated that it is being controlled at two feet above the curb line on Hellman because of the flow that well exceeds the top of the curb. When through, the design criteria on Hellman will be top of the curb and all will have to be done is to maintain the basic structures above top of the curb which will be affected one to one and a half feet. Commissioner Blakesley stated there is usually conflict when there is a transition between two different land uses and felt the developer has 4aplemented some sensible alternate uses, especially the buffer zone. The developer has agreed to security services, landscape maintenance services, and is open for other reasonable alternatives. Commissioner 81akesley commend the residents' concerns and appreciated their comments. Commissioner Emerick stated that the mitigation shows the developer has met the residents' concerns with good faith. Commissioner Emerick stated the developer has agreed to put in more lighting. Commissioner Tolstoy concurred there is a problem when there is a transition between two different land uses. He felt the best solution has been reached and is quite satisfied with the south elevation. Commissioner Chitiea stated that regular security patrolling would have more impact for the solution of crime. Chairman McHiel felt the grade differential had been mitigated as much as possible. Commissioner Chitiea suggested using the term 'nightly vnrsus 'daily' regarding the security patrol. •:.�c L�1:+•r...:.S.U:�I rl+:wosza Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 9, 1987 iv( DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PUR'i'OSE,; ONLY Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that tho City would nterpret 'daily as rwaning 24 -hour patrol. Commissioner Emerick moved to approve the resolution as modified, Commissioner Chitica seconded the motion: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, PLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: AONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -- carried DRAFT rt♦ FUR, Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 9, 1987 N7 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 9, 1987 G� 1 TO: Chairman and hers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESJIEWT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 e development of an a.2. acre integrated s oii ng center consisting of 4 retail buildings totaling 87,581 square feat in tho Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the coutheast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avem'e - APN 208 - 261 -58. ABSTRACT: At U ;a regular meeting of November 10, 1987, represen Lives of surraunding residents requested that this project be continued due to a time conflict for those concerned residents who could not attend the meeting. With the developer's consent to this request, the Planning Commission continued the protect to this regular meeting. The developer and the residents also agreed to meet one more time on December 4, 1987. The purpose was for the developer to explain and present the reasons why they have chosen this site plan design. The outcome of this neighborhood meeting will be presented to the Planning Commission at this public hearing. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a neighborhood shopping center, oetailed site pan, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - eT, Mouile Home Park, Single Family Homes, Vacant; Mixed Use District South - Single Family Homes; Low Residential District (2 -4 Gelling units per acre) East - Der Weinerschnitzel, Woolworth /Perry's Market Center, Mini - Warehouse; Community Commercial District Nest - Apartments, Single Family Home, Medium -High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), Low Residential District (2 -4 Gelling units per acre) pwir /Y P ITEM ` *, PLANNING COMMISSIO TAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NJHEST December 9, 1987 Page 2 III C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - CamunTtyCommercial North - Mixed Use South - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Community Commercial Nest - Medium -High Density Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. Parking Calculations: Type of Use Retail Fast Food Restaurant (no drive -thru) Restaurant Square Parking Footage Ratio 75,696 1/250 5,145 1/75 5,960 1 /100 Total Number of Spaces Required 303 69 60 432 Number of Spaces Provided 304 69 60 433 E. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with no significant vegetation. slopes gently from north to south at atpthe south sideeofenthe property Mitchkprotectsethe site single family homes from flooding. A Taco Bell restaurant exists at the corner of Helms Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. F. A licable Re ulations: The development of a shorping center is su ec o a on anal Use Permit according to the current Development Code. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project would be the first to be ev3 —Toped under the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan development standards and guidelines. (he proposed site plan clusters four retail buildings in a 'J' shape configuration. The developer has integrated the existing Taco Bell restaurant in his design of the site plan. Pedestrian connections have been provided throughout the site that link buildings and parking areas with sidewalks for promoting convenient and safe pedestrian movement. A major focal point has been provided in front of Building Retail 'C' that includes a tall tower and a large plaza area. Additional plaza areas have been provided between Pad `A' and Shop 010. Major access is provided from Foothill Boulevard, Helms Avenue and Hellman Avenue. Access for service and truck traffic is mainly from the secondary driveways off Helms Avenue and Hellman Avenue. /y9 PLANNING COIMISSIG TAFF REPORT CORDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUHEST December 9, 1987 Page 3 The proposed elevations project a contemporary spanish theme. It include; architectural elements and detail encouraged by the Foothill Specific Plan, such as covered arcades, curvilinear gables, towers with subtle variations in detsiling and design, trellises, plaster cornice, impost molding and accent ceramic tile. Detailing and other architectural elements have been added to the rear elevation of the main building to provide visual relief to the building mass. The same detailing and elements have been added to the rear elevation of those buildings that have Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue street frontages. B. Design Review Cowtttee: The Committee (Blakesley, Chitiea, rou as rev ewo the project on September 17, 1987 and found it to be acceptable, but recommended that all design items and toc) nical issues must be resolved by the applicant through tmrking with staff prior to being reviewed by the Planning Commission. The developer has been working diligently with staff in resolving all the technical issues and addressing those design items reco=ended by the Committee as follows: 1. The pedestrian connection between Shop `3' and Retail 'C' should be further improved to ensure it is safe and convenient for encouraging pedestrian usage. This could be achieved by increasing the vldth of the pedestrian connection to 15 feet and flaring out at the northern end adjacent to the main plaza area. Two free - standing trellises should be provided with additional pedestrian amenities such as benches, free - standing potted plants and adequate lighting for safety purposes. (Raised as shown in Exhibit 'H1'). 2. A similar pedestrian connection with design as mentioned above should be provided between Retail 'A' and Shop 020. (Revised as show in Exhibit 'He). 3. All pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles should be of textured treatment such as interlocking orick pavers, exposed aggregate or a combination of both. (Conditioned). 4. The existing stamped concrete texture pavement in the existing driveway of Helms Avenue should be replaced with textured material consistent with the shopping center. (Condttionedl. /XV PLANNIM COiMISSIO. rAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PEP141T 87 -16 - NUN S- Decenher 9, 1987 Page 4 S. Pedestrian amenities should be provided in front of Pad 'B'. (Conditioned). 6. Random stacking of roof the should be provided. (Conditioned). 7. The applicant should wur° with staff in resolving the design and tece„lcal issues for the stretch of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman Avenue and the first driveway to comply with all applicable City codes. (Revioed as shown in Exhibit 'I' 1'.re developer Wrassed the design issue by providing a meandering sidewalk behind a 5 to 10 foot ride landscape turf area. At such Lima al the catch basin will not be needed, the J foot wide concrete drain inlet could be reverted to and integrated as part of this landscape planter area. Both the City Planner and the City Engineer have reviewed this design and found it to be acceptable). 8. The applicant should work with surrounding residents and staff in developing acceptable solutions along the buffer zone at the south property boundary to mitigate the concerns of noise, view, privacy and security. (This issue rill be further discussed in Sections C and D of the report). 9. A significantly greater amount of trees as well as increased number of box -sized trees should ba planted along Foothill Boulevard because there is a 7 to 8 foot grade difference from the top of the curb to the parking area rend a 2:1 slope with a 3 foot high flood wall. Therefore, 15 gallon size trees, ground cover and shrNu may not be seen if planted within the slope area. (Conditioned). 10. This stretch of Foothill Boulevard should be designed as a suburban parkway where the landscape treatment should be dwinatad by Informal clustering of London Plane trees, California Sycamore and Crepe "le. All the parkway characteristics include rolling turf berms, meandering and undulating sidewalks and hardscape to compliment this informal landscape treatwent. (Conditioned). Isi PLANNING CCMMISiIO TAFF REPORT COWITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUWEST Decerier 9, 1987 Page 5 11. Increase the number of trees and box -sized trees should also be planted along Hellman Avenue to make up the landscaping within the public right - of -way consisting of 12 foot wide sidewalk and a 3 foot high flood wall. Landscape mounds should be provided up to the 3 foot high flat wall. (Conditioned). 12. Within plaza areas, special landscape treatment such as accent trees, specimen size e-aes, and an increased number of trees should be provided. ( Conditioned). 13. Dense landscaping should be provided along the entire south property boundary with trees, and a double row of shrubs, 5 gallon size and planted at 3 feet on center and with the appropriate ground cover. (Conditioned). 14. All walls such as flood walls, retaining walls, screen walls, should be of decorative design consistent with the architectural style. (Conditioned). C. Neighborhood Meetings: 1. A neighborhood meeting was held on July 6, 1987 to introduce this proposed project to the surrounding residents and to obtain feedback from them early in the review process. Nineteen residents were present at the meeting. The following is a summary of their concerns: a. Security and Safety Hazard the residents feel that the 3 foot high wall with the landscaping at the south Property boundary could create security and safety hazard, in that, it may not stop people from jumping over the wall into their side or back yar... b. Noise - Increased noise from crosercial vehicles, autos and from the collection of trash, especially when the trash enclosure areas are abutting at the south property boundary area. c. Trash - The trash enclosure area being in the back could contribute to trash beingg spilled over and could create health hazards such as increasing the amount of rodents and other unwanted animals. PLANNING COIMISSIO TAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERmiT 87 -16 - NUWEST December 9, 1987 Page 6 d. Traffic - At present, vehicles and trucks are using Helms Avenue and Devon Street as thoroughfares to bypass all the traffic signals an Foothill Boulevard. The proposed project would increase the mount of traffic along Helms Avenue. e. visual - The proposed project could block their view to the mountains. f. Privacy - The amount of parking spaces in the back and service drive invade their privacy, in that it could encourage loitering, increase in trim, etc. 2. On September 16, 1987, a second neighborhood meeting was held with 16 residents in attendance. The purpose of this meeting was for the developer to inform the residents of the type of mitigation measures they are proposing to address their concerns. The following are the proposed mitigation measures from the developer: a. Security anP Safety - The developer is proposing to raise the 3 foot high block wall to 6 fret high. Two wrought iron gates that are lockable will be included to allow for vorkers to maintain the 10 foot landscape area. The developer also is proposing to hire a private security fire to patrol the site, especially during the night. b. Noise - The developer stated that the rear parking lot is for employee parking only and that service and commercial vehicles do not involve semi- trucks. Therefore, the noise level generated would have negligible impact. c. Trash - In regards to trash collection, the developer stated that the shopping center does not include supenmr:et where the type of garbage will not be as messy. (Staff notes that new City regulations require self - closing trash dumpsters). PLMMING COMMISSIO, TAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - HUYEST December 9, 1987 Page 7 d. Trcffic - To discourage additional traffic from going south of project along Helms Avenue, the most southerly driveway will be closed. To discourage vehicles from using the service drive in the rear as a thoroughfare, speed bumps will be installed. Parking spaces will be designate! for employee parking only and signs could be posted for 'no overnight parking.' e. Privacy - The proposed six foot high block wall would prevent casual sight invasion of the homeowner's privacy. Further, bougainvillea or similar type of vines will be planted along the entire stretch of the block wall to discourage anyone from climbing over it. With the packing spaces designated for employee parking only, with signs posted for 'no overnight packing' and with adequate lighting, it would discourage people from 'hanging out" in the parking lot. The residents at the meeting reviewed the proposed mitigation measures from the developer and stated that they did not adequately address thel• concerns. The main issue is the service driveway and *be parking spaces, which could create the problem of invasion of privacy, security, noise, crime, etc. The residents feel that the developer should look into other alternatives in site plan design where tho back service driveway could be eliminated (see example in their petition). The residents also stated that the pad elevations for the building should be lowered so as not to obstruct their view of the mountains. 3. On October 26, 1987, staff conducted an informal meeting between the residents that abut the site immediately to tht south ind the developer. The purpose of this meeting was to show the final design and treatment of the buffer zone at the south property boundary. Staff also invited a member of the Sheriff's Department to attend this meeting who could answer questions regarding the issue of crime and safety. The residents reviewed the buffer zone treatment but did not have any consensus as to its adequacy in meeting their concerns. /Sy 7LANNING C"ISSIO' TAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERntT 87 -16 - NUIEST Deccsber 9, 1987 Page 8 D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the rn_VTr_0n5_eFf1r_MeckT s and has determined that the development of the project may have the following potertfal adierse impacts: 1. Drainage - The development of t;•is project may expose people or properties to water related hazards such as flooding. Hellman Avenue 's hlstorieally a water - carrying street. The site is within a flood zone. The project itself will not create any significant additional runoff onto Hellman Avenue. Mitigation Measure - A drainege/hydrology study nos een prov ea that determined mitigation measures to handle the surface rater including the 100 year flood. A 190 foot catch basin will be installed on Foo0ll Boulevard including a 72 inch pipe that connects south along Hellman Avenue, consistent with the City's Master Drainage Plan as shown in Exhibit 'E1 ". The installation of such drainage facilities would alleviate the past problem of excess surface •rater flooding the single family residences to the south. in addition, the City has scheduled two capital improvement projects to be completed within the next few years that would reduce the flooding along Hellman Avenue, as shown in Exhibit "E7." Traffic - The development of this project will n rease vehicular traffic. The residents also raised concerns that this project would add to the traffic along Helms Avenue. At present, vehicles and trucks are using Helms Avenue and D ►van Street as a thoroughfare to avoid signals at Foothill and Archibald and Foottill and Hellman. Mitigetion Measure - Foothill Boulevard, being a major arter-FaTlaffil having a raised median island with no opening, would be able to move the traffic at an acceptable level. In regards to increased traffic on Helms, the City Traffic Engineer stated a traffic signal will be ultimately installed at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Helms Avenue. Further, the City could put up "no truck traffic" signs along Helms Avenue to prevent trucks from using this route as a short cut. The street is already posted for a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. /rs PLANNING COMMISSIO, rAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUWEST December 9, 1987 Page 9 3. Noise - Tha development of this project may rr.crease notse levels for the single family residents to the south in that, the rear service driveway and parking spaces would generrte truck and service /delivery traffic. Mitigation Measure - A time linitation of 7 a.m. t0 P.m. s ou required for all service and delivery activity along the service driveway. All trash enclosure areas have been oriented away from the south property boundary. The parking spaces should be designated for employee parking only. Signs should be posted that indicate "no overnight parking allowed.' The block wall along the south property boundary should be designed to attenuate noise. According to the city's Municipal Code, refuse collection fer shopping centers that are adjacent to residential districts would not occur before 6 a.m.. 4. Light o� - The requirements to light the u ng, sery ce driveway and the parking area in the back could increase the light and Clare to the residences at the south property boundary. Mitigation Measure - All light poles shall not ezcbe a max mum eight of 15 feet measured from the finished grade. Wall mounted light fixtures should not exceed 15 feet from the finished grade of the parking lot in the rear. All light fixtures should hava shields to prevent light from spilling over and should be of high pressure sodium type (orange color). S. Crime /Securit - The residents stated that the eve epsen of this project would attract addit'onal crime at this rear parking area and servicb drive. Mitigation Measure - The developer is proposing Co re a pr va a security firm to patrol the site, together with the installation of block walls, landscaping, lights, signs posted for no overnight parking, parking spaces designated for employee parking only, and time limitations on service /delivery activity, It may decrecse the chances of crime. Based on the above mitigation measures, some of which have been incorporated into the project and the remainder being /56 PLANNING COlMISSIO TAFF REPORT COWITIONAL USE PERmT 87 -16 - NUNLST December 9, 1987 Page 10 added to as conditions of approval, staff has determined that there will not be significant impacts as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. IV. FACTS fOR FINDINGS• This project is consistent with the General an an a oothill Boulevard Specific Plan in that: The design of the project creates community design image that expresses and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cuuawnga; the proposed project facilitates efficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic; and the project maintained the highest possible quality of the environment by balancing the fi?acts of development to the surrounding areas. In eddition, the proposed use, building design, site plan, togother with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and all other applicable provisions of the City's standards. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not cruse significant adverse environmental impacts. Y. CORRESPONDENCE: This item is a continued public hearing. Public ear ng no ces were sent to all prop ^riles within 600 of the project site. In addition, four neighborhood meetings were held y the developer. VI. WOHIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conauc a pu c hearing to consider all input. If the Commission concurs with staff's finding, then Issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Conditional Use Permit 87 -16 would be In order. R r 1eftl .ad, B ler, C a er OB:NF:te Attachments: Letter from Residents Exhibit "A• - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Buffer Zone Cross Sections Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan (3) Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Plaza Design Exhibit "N" - Pedestrian Connection Design Exhibit "I" - Corner 8 Foothill Boulevard Streetscape Design Exhibit "J" - Lighting Plan Exhibit "K" - Elevations Exhibit "L" - Storefront Design Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions /S'9 — RCCEIVE0- ..7Y OF RANCHO CIUCANO IQf. �LVIY4p OnpS'0• M ?i8i9i10�14Li1,21314 In, C +; November 3, 1987 Planning Commission ATT: Chairman 1 We the people petition that the meeting sat forth for November 10, 1987 at 6s00p.m. to discuss the proposed i plan for Hallman Avenue at Foothill Boulevard be con- tinued due to the fact that the people are not able to be present to voice their opinions about the proposed Flan. A meeting scheduled for the evening hours would be more appropriate for everyone. Sincerely, f Aldo Capocei L rry ozzo Larry Williams Iss 0 — 'Z EC Clu3� — r OF ,... r, J cu- August S, 987 AUG 111907 Dear Commissioners, Honrrable Mayor, d council Memborse AM pM 718191101111Li11213141516 On July 6, 1987 a public meeting was held by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division and a developer to discuss t..e proposed shopping center to be located of tha Southeast cornor of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. We the undersigned, after careful examination of the proposed plan, found that many Important Issues were not properly addressed. These Issues - security, nciso, garbage, traffic control, privacy, and land value are among the major concerns tlat wilt have a direct Impact on our community. Security - The proposed plan (Sightllne Print) outlines that a buffer --- -- zone of approximately 19 -20 feet wide at a higher elevation than the existing property barrier wall be Implemented. This buffer zone In Itself compliments r;•Iminal activity. The screening wall approximately 6 feet height does not provide a good deterrent, In that a parking lot sit adjacent. The parking lot provides a nesting place for all kinds of unwarranted activities. The proposed Ilghting also creates a prison effect by Illuminating the houses It would face. Noise - Traffic, both autos and commercial vehicles, will create an - --- unbearable noise level that dca3n1t even exist at this time. The proposed buildings and elevation will create an echoing effect that again adds to the destruction of a quiet residential neighborhood. Garbage - The buffer zone, as wslI as the parking lot, w I I I be a haven ---- for refuse. People, autos, and commercial vehicles will contribute to the polluting of our neighborhood. Refuse collection Is another matter with bins being located In the rear of the buildings and collectors constantly spilling will provide a residence for rodents and other unwanted animals. Traffic Control - Today with Taoo Bell, Wlenerschnitzal, Woolworths, -- ----- and Perryls Market, autos and commercial vehicles are using Helms Avenue and Devon Street as thoroughfares to bypass traffic signals at Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. The proposed plan will create additional traffic to the already overloaded local streets. Furthermore, a new thoroughfare (parking lot) will be created between Hallman Avenue and Helen Avenue, contributing to the overall congestion. Privacy • Privucy Is Invadec by the elevation (Slghtllne Print) of the -- --- -- proposed plan. Again, the homeowner, who Is Immediately adjacent to the parking lot, Is subjected to visual Inspection by the patrons. Re-tall Space - A provision should be Implemented that no 24 hours -- stores be allowed. We propose that additional studies be done on each of the above Issues. Enclosed Is a sampling of wTat can be done to appoo,.a all concerned. We sincerely hope that these Issues co carefully reviewed, and before , ,(1AAf C --- - -` — - - _ -- .LDD it s S _ cY- G7� ^�Q.t�Tko�n M -�.�v. - -- - -- - -• -- -- 8-�55r oati��G C$- 79 (UL �� ' �,'Ca�.v�.c —•- _ — goZS.q z c•i - - -- - Oil CITY OF li.. P AhNIN4 _�_�_7_— _ � 44 R 21�s �� iL°�F'a�.�id •c� ew z5 ;,7�% � �- -- 621/5 ��,�. ✓ /66 IaA-.....Je% i� 34. ''y• ti11L 113 Yy V5 U52- l 26 Oav yV GF- i _ rr I - A,,•�� rim 2/JOf� %Il��i esu l i _ -.7 $ z. / O t)VJc �r�':`�i10;11;12Qi2psrrr�iG �Z%6 t%yy Cf- 7.1 ._ _ _ 5221 on,, C, —_ et /6l I M, M, J'l 0 LL new-% C17Y -rj RG 111987 _T1819-11olu PU F�-_ U- �"ffj /rrz- RAV ""ffam �G 1 1� I� f � c y `� �` M • w w O_ O r � s Y � r s w n G I r Q I 000 z cft IV J P lct, eH i b Fc 1�G' O � w �. U;r ° ;nw : _ c LJ C) f �t c io ZMIC�. au d w �_ q` �` 1-> K+' Si /� �t `•:j a t i ill �3R �0g o h I{ F ��! IOOINL RIB � '1Y A� �� •>ri! �'01M1� 1 1 (oS r' a I 1G 6 I 7 • Ib � it 1 6t 1 _ . r a n� X ;r: � Is 1 i , r I r ' r I ptP1 Ir ! 10'7 lilt - r er ' � t rj • , f 'J \ I A � „i'1= t N 11 : • ;Ir I � 1 • R R SCREEN WALL ON RET WALL EXISTING WALL — EXIST HOUSE EXIST L 6' io• !! .0 = e.o ice_ —JI� U CURB AND 6UTTER SECTION 'As A' SCALE V- ;0' AHD GOITER �y\ SECTION "I -V SCALE 8 1" • 10' r j • ft.F FF =92- f s. I 91 EXIST HOUSE 8 AND GUTTER SECTION "C -C" It SCALE' 1 10' 10. EXIST HOUSE I I eta N Is. 9 C G%ITTER EXIST. 'ec pe- SHE D to\ I a \ SECTION "'e -E" SCALE % I" 4 10" • IO' i S' I � 0 (,CUR& d GUTTER SECTION "f -f" SCALE I I "CIO f I � J• /69 PLANTER CURB mil Tnu. c�Dsr !O FXHII3T —WAU. / I I f 3011 I SECTION g - g" S C A�L E 1" ■ 10' _ 1-� .n , SL.\ SECTION "H -H" SCALE I's 10, 11' 30' NET. WALL ►.F. w 5 w��. 3 334A w�4 SECTION "I•I " r SCALE --I- , 10' NOUH CITY OF rrEm. �1PB1 -16 RANCHO CLUAMONGA Mu. • J PLANNQVG Oi\/L570[V EXHUM SCALE. s !7o F � laa• -- 13 .. n-n YAW; 1" . 10' 2 3.0' OL003 WALL - tl_� 1 . ' C SECTION "L-L " SCALE , 1' . 102. T. Kam' 1%, i SECTION "N'N" SCALE • 1 "•10' CTrr or rrEM- edf 10 -�G RANCHO CLJCAMON(,A Tm.E ' _C�ff - fi27lA PLAWIM DIVLSM EXH[BrT'_J95_SCA1F. s ;- 171 -95 L Z Q 6 J 19th z Q <, J Q:' Qi ul R R IOM IMMU. w w 0 c a cr- w CH RCH RIOH FOOTHILL �I Y S to -Pro) ct 2 t } w j • • • i . s, vOR'i1� MEM, O � i6 ' _rf ati _ri,Hf�r w BASE LIME CH RCH RIOH FOOTHILL S to -Pro) ct 2 t 6th I vOR'i1� MEM, O � i6 ' _rf ati _ri,Hf�r i 12 9 T X 4' 310 X • L It S' ! ,,, F.F. • 7S SO SECTION "P•P" SCALE * 1" • 10' � F.;. a 93.00 SECTION "Q•G1" It SCALE 1" & 10' 293.00 SECTION "R•R" SCALE t I" + 10' 1 I� rrwl L1J��b rm.E� — CifcYr �LT�vy�_ EXHmr- 9G scAu.- /7.3 e MEN a� 7 ;� 1. ►y _ �1 .1 ., , (I �'�• . - mss. � ',{��_ � a ��—!^^"_ �'• _ v any' ��u' ' • c "Nadel .= r C n M ' s � �a 0 0 J 5+[ l /a I F N ♦ M 9 n ] M l7 9' r va • • 1 w � y •� -a 1 v7r� r. r zi � a1 I•• .L.. 3 _ - I G r l Vi t fill q 1 `j1 .w�Fiww� wM r� 1 w � y •� -a 1 v7r� r. 1 1 r zi .L.. 3 _ - I G r l Vi t fill `j1 .w�Fiww� wM r� 1 1 NORTH E__t✓VATION AT (d 'SOUTH= ELF.Viel(Ql PA-0t. A' G1 R 'n� CL CAMON,A r, P PLAN M DWSM EXHIBIT, SCALE, / 181. s_ /. •, .+ . - MY a WEST ELEVATION Y EAST ELEVATION vye•.r.o• SOUTH ELEVATION �u.wsv ait''• -•�: aes` rz?,. drat r i + r c NORTH ELEVATION CITY OF rrEM, �arrti _ �' /6 RANCHO CUCAMaNGA '�jPLANNG DVSa IXHgI, lf do SC:ALE. I83 :-`_ �..;. r� c .; 4 ^r Nadel a `I. n.u., i �.+ N VD *j 11 RESOLUTION NO. 07 -211 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90. 87 -16 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN 8.2 ACRE INTEGRATED SHOPPING CENTER, CONSISTING CIF A RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 87,581 SQUARE FEET LOCATED AT TH: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HELLMAN AVENUE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - APN 208 - 261 -58 A. Recitals. (1) Mast has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Pera:it No. 87 -16 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is raferred to as 'the application'. (11) On the 10th of November. 1987, the Planning Commission of ti%a City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a dull; noticed public hearing on the application and continued this project to the December 9, 1987 regular meeting at the request of the residents and with consent of the applicant. (i11) On the 9th of December, 1987, the Planning Comedssion of the C'ty Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing. occurred. (10 All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, determined and rc:olved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission here4l specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 10, 1987, Including written and oral staff repots, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue with a street frontage of 1,535 feet and lot depth of 612 feet and is presently vacant. (b) The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a motel, mobile home park , the pro arty to the south of that site is single family homes, the property to +.he east is developed with retail commercial shops, and the property to the west 1s apartments. ME PLANNING C"ISSIC .ESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PENNIT 87 -16 - NUVEST December 9, iP87 Page 2 (c) The propose: project complies with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in that: The site plan design and architectural style enhance the unique character end identity Rancho of Ran Cucamonga; and, the site plan design is integrating the existing Taco Ball restaurant and eliminating the existing driveway off Foothill Boulevard; and *acilltates efficient and safe vehicular traffic along Foothill Boulevard. (d) The identified potential adverse environmental impacts have been addressed with mitigation measures being added to the project and added as conditions of approval to ensure this project would not result in a decrease in environmental quality. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That die proposed use 1s in accord with the General P%n, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) that the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been revieved and considered in compliance kith the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated heroin by this reference. Planning Division: (1) The pedestrian connection between Shop Or and Retail •C• and between Retail 'A' and Shop 02' shall have additional pedestrian amenities such as benches, free - standing potted plants and adequate lighting for safety purposes. The building elevations along these two pedestrian connections shall have recessed window areas rather than popped -out window areas. Detailed )89 PLANNING C"ISSI tESOLUTION NO. COWITIONAL USE PEXHIT 87 -16 - NUNEST December 9, 1987 Page 3 design shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (2) All pedestrian pathways and across circulation aisles shall be of textured treatment such as interlocktnpp brick pavers, exposed aggregate or a combination of both. Samples shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. (3) The existing stamped concrete textured pavement in the existing driveway off Helms Avenue shall be replaced with textured material consistent with the shopping center. (4) Pedestrian amenities shall be provided in front of Pad 'B'. (5) Random stacking of roof tilt shall be provided. (6) A significantly greater amount of trees, as well as increased number of box sized trees, shall be planted along Foothill Boulevard. (7) The corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue and along Foothill Boulevard shall have special landscape treatment consistent with the suburban parkway design guI del 1nes of the Foothill Boulevard Speelfie Plan. The parkway characteristics shall include lnfornal clustering of London Plane trees, California Sycamore and Crape Wrtle, rolling turf berms, undulating sidewalks and handscape to compliment this informal landscape treatment. Detailed design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building peratts. (8) M increased number of trees and box sized trees shall be planted along Hellman Avenue to make up the landscaping along the public right - of -way consisting of a 12 foot wide sidewalk and a 3 foot high flat wall. A landscape mound should be provided up to the 3 foot high flood wall. (9) Within plaza areas, special landscape vreatments such as accent trees, specimen size trees and increased number of trees shall be provided. I 90 PLANNING COo1ISsi. IESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PEWiIT 87 -16 - NUNEST December 9, 1987 Page 4 (10) Dense landscaping shall be provided along the entire south property boundary in front of the six foot high block wall with trees, shrubs and appropriate ground cover. In addition, bouganvillea vines or another type of vine that will grow along this entire stretch of block wall shall be planted to discourage graffiti and discourage people from climbing over. (11) All walls such as flood walls, retaining walls, screening walls shall be of decorative design consistent with the architectural style. (12) Dense landscaping should be provided within the 10 foot landscape area along the entire south property boundary with evergreen trees, shrubs and appropriate ground cover. (13) All service and delivery activity along the rear service driveway shall occur between the time of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. (14) fie developer shall provide serarity personnel to patrol the site daily and at ail tines. Documentation shall be submitted to the Planning Division and kept an file. (15) The block wall and landscaping along the south property boundary shall be designed to attenuate noise. An acoustical study shall be submitted to verify noise attenuation for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (16) Signs shall be conveniently posted along this rear service driveway and parking area for 'no overnight parking", and 'employee parking only. (17) All light pale fixtures shall not exceed the height of 15 feet measured from the finished grade. Nall Munted lights for the rear elevation shall not exceed 15 feet measured from the finished grade of the parking lot. All lighting fixtures shall have shielding mechanisms to prevent light and glare into the southerly properties. (18) A uniform hardscape and street furniture treatment including trash receptacles, free- standing potted plants, bike racks, and light bollards, etc., shall be utilized for the shopping cent'r� land shall be designed to be PLANNING COK41SSI RESOLUTION 110. CONDITIONAL USE PLAIT 87 -16 - NUN£ST December 9, 1987 Page 5 compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs -hall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (19) The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved site plan which includes architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping and grading on file with the Planning Oivision, the conditions contained herein and Development Code regulations. Engineering Division (1) Flood protection measures and necessary easements shall be provided as described Jr. the preliminary flood report and as may be required by final flood report to include, but not limited to, a catch basin and store drain system, flood walls and rolled drivewrys. (2) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) an the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage extending to the first pole south of the project (all poles along the project frontages shall be removed) prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development and /or redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. (3) 'NO parking any tire :ones shall be provided along Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ,. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 L PLANNING COMMISS• "I RESOLUTION W. CONDITIONAL USE . AT 87• : - NUNEST December 9, 1987 Page 6 I, Brad culler, Mputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho ly Int ga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was'duly and regularly Introduced, Passed, and adopted by the Planning Cooissfon of the City of Rancho Cucaenllga, at a regular metro of the Planet?y Commission held on the 10th day Of NOYaWar, 1987, by the following rate -to -wit: AYES: CONMISSIOPiRS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, aLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: C(J MISSIf,4m: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONF 143 : ■ � l & / ■| �- l 91 � | .� �| | k�� !� t � � ■ | | | # !� • ,p _ TL |' _ | Ja i\ � j § ■ { | f � ■ �,. �� • | � . § f is , ■ `| ! |, ) !� t 11 if | , t ■!� | !194 j § ■ { | I p�- |q�i |� r� �J |�| !� ■ n1| N k ,ea , | U ZX | t \ q ! 9 � { | � � � § I | , �!\■,,. I i I 2 /E 9 J §5 a | 42 �> �f � �. ! ,!. : | ( f �p lip -4 R R |! |4 @- � w� !� �f .� k �\ ., \� EAi .F h' � tit | �ƒ \( � � � fR \E lit! � � a �a � � ! § � � r \� it � ! a '.Lai I It |� S � 4� _ |G ■�_ - ¥ a | � � �■� |4 /f s: | f ex � ' & | ! \\! Ali � � | ■�2! ' ;� | !� rill §� ! �\ [ cat \/ �q s § ■ � / 2 , -:. -•!! #_ % ! A@ Qa r 1.1i s - tt| � - : | � I U || m� \ � f I 22 | � � | . I lit L, I :fwd 9■ 1 • : : A 4 | I f: -- | %§ / \| Mg ; |�f . ! k ■TL :2 ! ■ -d! #` !p -� ' � a� � &� � ƒ� |r a |! - ! �=��! |' / f% ' ! �y q | | ' ills if | -.is! it . l — | »� ■E, | | ■� � 0 ) I i 2 , VISM iz � � � # Q |£| . Eby! j ■ |� |j j � j 777 P•, �i� - � s fit! [ El=ai :�. at r at t �r =F! •• v ra. tt CHI I \ %I =\ t S i s Ii! er_-n • Eir i� Jai ?t��32 i] 1 P- �Ss E tlr�l .s r� P e �7a _ �It f �,3 dE . r1'> f si =E ): U-11 pull ' w rill r3Si- ' Y & Wtv. a _ 33c Eti3 s�t 4t '� .Rr =� ._tr t_ -� i t Sts sad ��` "fit ;:�• ' �t 1sg ds : E!s! fill rt ra Sp� 7 ^ i is :: c3t 191 n H , 9 f q | ' Nli ! � � %/� l��, � � � : ! ' �,• q 9 |! |.... «•• � /f6 �� 5bgk �,I! ■ #| . '- �!! §'�, �_�._ �! h• ! |r 2S k, | ■2 . / £� Lill !ic \r= LA a� ) : Z ! ® • .ni 2 -- % �f lit fill § | | IT a tdv 'a Npl `2 |fA Ili � : f! , #! § - . . / | ■ R� 1 : =s ; ■ = £ t f £31 -A lit I �� | ©]��'•q �l�e,J! ■��, � � #�■ q� /��! \. /�� |� ��! }� 4N j ) !9 . Ir � ' \vFt: R- ti Icl it Ift j 3T. ?E}pj Q f9 g s f iE i iE g I S r fE i Mfg a t art ~ gg i f 3 � ; ft 0 itI £ it &c e I I I s I<< IF IF Ell ii E i t �� cte e Q i^ p a � R0. s SS -& E I�Q ^- qqt •Sa S S S {_ sS �° .� �`x i3 � sTi� s � R! of � ii _ �s �'_ i aq ;gg = 3 sE EQS aj t IIQ� 1 PAR cE E aag E i S Et'a 3 g a g3'it F t 11, P F, SS (i i !• �s 1c1q I_ at. ' Ra c� tF iz ij £i ,a g� �1 c� F5 �c -s i5 I J ul LL- .. * uia. MM of nwoawoi ��4p ue d� w�1°�°'®iwacm m'i°om• nni�j� tl Site Plan 11 CITY Or RANCHO CLTCAMO \'GA PLAiVNNU DIVLSICN ::too rrEM. *� V l ♦nRTli �N 0 F i Li �I �i F 9 n a A3wlmd_,.. •• i Cl'f t Or RANCHO CUCAM014GA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: Mayer and Members of the City Council L FROM: E'rad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES94ENT riM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -41 e y g t of a schog ® ss on s ec s on ve o district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation/ maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202- 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three (3) mature trees. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of on one se Permit 87 -41. II ANALYSIS: A. Back round: On December 9, 1987, the planning Co ®isston con uc e a public hearing to consider all elements of the proposed school district facility. At that time, several area residents, includinj homeowners to the east and a representative of the church to the nortn, expressed their opposition to the proposal. In addittcn, a petition with approximately 65 names of surrounding residents was submitted in opposition to the proposal. Alter considering all aspects of the project, the Planning Commission determined that the land use and architecture were not appropriate for this location. B. Land Use: In examining the project based on the uses proposed, e anning Commission stated that the school district facility was not appropriate in the residential area for the following reasons: 1. The facility would include industrial type uses such az machine and wood shops, a paint booth, and bus maintenance 3)rc4 that are not permitted in a residential zone under other circumstances. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - Alta Loma School District January 20, 1988 Page 2 2. The vehicle maintenance facility, together with the machine and wood shops would generate excessive noise and vibration in the area. 3. fie paint booth would generate unwarranted odors and potential hazardous contamination by airborne particulants. 4. The facility would increase heavy vehicle traffic (trucks and buses) on nearby streets which would normally be Molted to residential traffic, thereby contributing to excessive noise and vibration. S. The proposal will create excessive light and glare which w111 adversely impact the adjacent areas. C. Building Architecture: The Planning Commission also felt that loca e arc ec ure proposed w{s not appropriate for this metalibuildl gewhichhisen using a therresidential character of the area. Within the Industrial Specific Plan area, metal buildings are only permitted within the Heavy Industrial Designations. The Planning Commission also felt that the design of the administration building, while better warehouse building. was is compatible w1in scale wiith the area. D. g pansion: The Planning Commission expressed concern that if �Fe proposal was approved at this location that the 5 acre parcel located to the south (also owned by Alta Loma School District) might be the likely location of an expansion of this use and /or of the storage of the bus fleet which is presently stored at Chaffey College. This would further compound the adverse impacts on adjacent properties and properties In the vicinity. 'oj fully 5 load, i e / "'tf anner r;8: SM: vc Attachments: Letter of Appeal Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Resolution of Denial acs JIM A. M N9QLJEZ December 17, 1987 Miss Beverly Authelet �= City Clark City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Bacalitle Rd., Suits C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91703 CITY 0 FRAANCF O 1U MONCA ADMINISTRAT ION DEC 181987 Im TA911hUI211AS19A8 A Ox P&LIMai; i G• rat Appeal Planning Commission Decision denying Conditional Use Application "Public Facility Use" Dear Hiss Authelett This office has bean authorized to file an appeal to the planning commission decision denying conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP No. 87 -41 a request of the Alta Loma School District to establish a public facilities use on the property located on the east side of Beryl Street south of 19th Street - APNt 202- 041 -01 6 42 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The applicants contend by this filing that the planning commission errored in evaluating the public facilities use as being Inconsistent with the zoning ordinance and general plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Further, the school district finds that planning commission denial results in hardships which Jeopardize the delivery of educational facilities contrary to the health, safety and general welfare of th•j community. Please find attached a check in the amount of $126.00 from the Alta Loss School District. I 1 0 1'V: ' i ni 111 t't I:1I I'll I II I ,A (4 1r,h r•1 i1 '•Vr�1•P Ms. Debra Beverly Authelat December 17, 1987 Page 2 Should the city have any further questions or desire additional information pertaining to this appeal please feel free to contact this office. \ 7nry truly ours, s ?" inali pleennina Consultant r J JAM:dba.072 cc: Alta Loma school District Mr. Floyd stork Carmichael -Ramp, Architects �.n eea curmi<a•, co.. z;;;- -- CIfY Of nANCI10 CUCAMONGA POM 0111" Box 807 Rancho Cuter w #ga.IC.,IIfmnia 917;0 M.. N ^9 �wYlfa iuRitil xme nJaJiie.ir iJ.i erne — i�ridri:i[4iFUe RK4101 Number TOTgL 47902 wM 6 (71C) 989.1851 L. DRAFT Fos n!S"5e1cti FURFOFES ONLY LDMA—S:FMUC—M3TR= - - - - - -- - -..._ -- - -m'. w -7{ - MIA ac cons s ng of a 10.M square footscadmlnistration building, A 18,170 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square toot transportatio! /maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in VI- Low Residential District (2 -4 rniling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryi Street, south of 19th Street - Removal Permit0requesting tteocremo Val ��Ofhfaour (4)ematu�re ettrees,Tree Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Blakesley questioned the height of the warehouse. Mr. Murphy responded 18 feet in height. Commissioner Tolstoy requested clarification of the distance tram the south boundary line of the school p!vperty to the proposed development. property to the propose9 development. Mr. Murphy responded 330 feet. Commissioner Tolstoy asked wtether staff has seen a proposal for the vacant property south of the proposed site. Mr. Murphy stated no, but indicated that it is currently General Planned and zoned Residential, tha,eforr hr, would anticipate that it would be developed as residential single family. Chairman McHiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim Marquez, 1334 Parkview Avenue, Manha »tan Beach, rwpresenting the Alta Loma School District, stated they agree and concur with the staff report. Mr. Marquez presented the background of the school district and the purchase of this property. Commissioner Chitiea questioned the size of the undeveloped parcel below the proposed site. Hr. Marquez responded 5.2 acres, the same size of the proposed project. Commissioner Blakesley questioned what size of parcel would the school district lock for in developing an elementary school. Mr. Marquez responded anywhere frua five to seven acres. i1! ?AFT ao? 11RAr- T Ms. Rose Cayler, 9090 Hamilton, Re cR Cucamonga, representing the majority of the residents, namely on Hamilton. Zircon, and Opal neighboring the proposed site, stated her concerns egarding the traffic, noise, for decrease of property value, parking, and having a metal building in a residential neighborhood. Ms. Cayler stated the land should be developed as residential. Commissioner Emerick questioned Cayler how she felt if this site were to be developed as an eleeantary school. Ms. Cayler stated she felt the neighbors would like to see this developed as residential. Mr. Mark Vogelsang, 9071 Hamilton, Rancho Cucemonga, addressed the issues of traffic congestion, noise, and feels this could attract vandalism. He felt a school would be more suitable In the area rather than the proposed warehouse and workshops. Mr. Vogelsang would prefer to see the area remain residential. Mr. Richard Feurstein, 9982 Golden, Alta Loa, stated that warehouses, maintenance operations, and equipment yards do not belong in a residential neighborhood. He felt thst the Planning Commission would not apprtve this unattractive of a building even in an industrial development. He agreed with the traffic congestion and the aesthetics of the proposed project. Pastor Mike Johnsen, En Agape Cn-istian Fellowship Church, agreed with the concerns of the traffic rchgestion and felt that a metal building should not be allowed in a residential area. Mr. Jim Marquez, representing the Alta Loma School District, addressed the residents' concerns and expressed how they felt they have mitigated the traffic, security, vandalism, and street width concerns. lie felt these issues and been adequately addressed and resolved. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Chairman McNiel stated this proposal is significantly counter to what the Planning Commission is trying to accomplish from a lareJ r:se and 'esign standpoint. Chairman WNiel continudd stating though he understands the school district's position, to allow this project in a residential project makes no sense at all. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with Chairman McNiel on tho land use issue, the circulation, and aesthetic problems. The Planning Commission would not consider this type of project anywhere else in the City, except perhaps in the heavy industrial area. Commissioner Chitiea stated that 19th Street is already heavily impacted and does not find the proposed solution workable. The warehouse, aesthetically, is a severe problem. The architecture alone is another whole issue and this project has significant problems. Commissioner Chitiea stated a land swap or Planning Commission Minutvs -2- December 9, 1987 aOa' DRAFT FOR Discusi3.Lld 1'.- %`�r�:: C.: '. "1:.:_•f to relocate in tohangs miintthe City pursued t would befmore the to in meeting both the needs of the School District and the City. care of TJ,etr needs. witthh e Cthe Commissionersealndaddressed other issuesnregardingelightingaand use and storage of vartvus hazardous waste matertuls that ted he nanc the not find and pro Jectocontributeidsanythingakpositive es stated he neighborhood or the City• lli comments other currLd rlanduand can't really Commissioner Ttnceissuei prnaY CoissionerSta9th be Solved vi so the through relocate sug9eated the district look at other looked at design Coeoissioner Emerick stated in Design Review w Committee felt tsho heavy and not land use- camouflage the warehouse building landscaDtn9 Propo 1dea1 solution but the onlyyy one the school Dlstrtct could propose with etghboris cimi s and oth t.Coaalscommissioner slonerso coame ts. agreed witht he Commissioner Chitl moved to direct staff to p a resoion of repare denial. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the w3tton. Notion clutarried by m the following vote: BLIKESIEY, F7tEpICK, NCNIEL AYES: COIM:SSIONE;G: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Jrnuary113,.19BBtymaeting r' to brousjht item k ar.uadConsent Calendar item with a Resolution of Oenial. Comaissionir Tolstoy stated he did not fuel the bootleg buildings were approDrlaU• 1n this residential area and Irould like to see thtm removed. Brad Belle wore City hrough Code En arctha Cot isremove the buildings staff to Toe Commis:,ion direeted staff to proceed with Cede Enforcement. 1 plcaning Coumisstal','�.in,lra -3- X04 December 9, 1997 CT?'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C%_ri STAFF REPORT , a DATE: December 9, 1987 is TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comoissien FROM: Brid Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -41 e eve opmen a a sc o0 _r c raff ity cons s ng of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, anti a 15,600 square foot transportation/ raintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the cast side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APR: 202 - 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of 3 mature trees. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, phasing plan, c_nce�rad(ng plan, conceptual landscape plan, elevations for the administration and warehouse buildings, Tree Removal permit, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and 2onin or - tnur&; Eow Re57�Miai (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Low ROM &Atial (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residential under construction; Low Residential (2 -4 duelling units per acre) Nest - Single family residential and vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations: project site - I.ow es en.ial (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low P.ecidontial (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Lou Aesidential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Ernst - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwe11`ng units per acre) ITEM L Z10 PLANNING COMIISSIO TAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LUNA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 2 II D. Site Characteristics: The northwest portion of the site is pprrsens y mprove w asphalt paving, a "bootlegged' portable building, and several pportable storage receptacles. The remainder of the site 1s vacant with an average slope of roughly 2.5% from northwest to southeast. There is an existing concrete flood control channel within s City easement that cuts diagonally through the northeast corner of the site. The site also contains several eucalyptus trees - two in the southwest corner along Beryl and others along the eastern side of the project area. E. Parking Calculations: Phase 3 - office 10,500 1/250 42 43 Warehouse 31,675 1/1000 32 32 Bus 13 73 W F. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code conditionally Pemirs pu Ticc facilities /utilities within the Low Residential District. Because there are no classrooms pro7osed, the project is not exempt from the City's review process and regulation. therefore, requires a Conditional Usi Pe.*mit. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a school MMMZ facility consisting of a 10,500 skvrare foot administration building, a 16,075 square Sint warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation /maintenance building. The development of the facility will be handled in three phases. The inivIal phase will consist of the construction of the warehouse building, a parking and loading a/i Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Phase 1 - Office 1,321 1/250 5 10 Warehouse 14,754 1/1000 15 15 '20' 3S Phase 2 - Office 10,500 1/250 42 43 Warehouse 16,075 1/1000 16 28 3S 737 Phase 3 - office 10,500 1/250 42 43 Warehouse 31,675 1/1000 32 32 Bus 13 73 W F. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code conditionally Pemirs pu Ticc facilities /utilities within the Low Residential District. Because there are no classrooms pro7osed, the project is not exempt from the City's review process and regulation. therefore, requires a Conditional Usi Pe.*mit. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a school MMMZ facility consisting of a 10,500 skvrare foot administration building, a 16,075 square Sint warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation /maintenance building. The development of the facility will be handled in three phases. The inivIal phase will consist of the construction of the warehouse building, a parking and loading a/i PLANNING COWISsIO TAFF REPORT CUP 87-41 LTA LbnA SCMAOL DISTRICT December g, Page 3 area, the driveways out to Beryl, and a spray booth. The warehouse will accommodate a machine and carpentry shop, bus maintenance area, and temporary office facilities. IamediatelY following the construction de the t Of the building, Phase 2 x111 coeaence with ee development tt�e nr' Ye i Of the offices from the werehousepbuild ing.tlet d the completion of Phase 2r all i rovements will be comp on the western two - thirds of ea iJ�ieetransportation /maintenance At this point in time. Phase 3, owns to building is purely conceptual- pre cantndoes mmfeele plans construct this building. h that there may be a nead for this bulldinS to the future if e school district was to untf�o with °tthe� use dastriart of the result, the applicant has D g fl`rrallPmaster a' °v�annotr been srevlexedeand lwculde have to and approved prior to construction. B. Land Use: fie Development Code established a list of uses tiesor po en a Y have greater impacts BOMnauseloofinihesep potential properties in the vicinity. S red , Suct 1s the impacts, a Cfnditiona1 Use Permit is requ the case with the school district fecilitY want to consider the request, the Planning Commission aunt following Points. both pro and con, in determining whether the proposed use is apProPn ate for this location: Pro I The singletfamlly reside noesaaTherelis alehu ch located physical north barrier betweenflood thecontrol facilityaandlthprovides e homes to the east. The vacant residenti&IIY zoned property to the south is owned by the school District and there are The anplans aaintenance facilities are sepp°roc ed Dy warehousing hundred feet and screened by the administration building from the homes across Beryl Street. Street (365 feet to the north) thereby eliminating 2. Bus and truck traffic will access the site from ti additional heavy traffic down the Beryl District at two deliveries are estimated by per week. 21.1' PLANNING COMMISSIO. rAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 4 3. The closest structure, the church, typically operates at hours opposite those of the School District. The District operates 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday while the church's peak hours are on Sunday 4. The warehouse building is setback approximately 212 feet back from Beryl, 60 feet from the north perimeter, and 96 feet from the south perimeter in an attempt to minimize the impact on surrounding properties. Con 1. The School District facility is proposing several uses that may not be appropriate within a residential area. The warehousing, machine and carpentry shops, paint booth and bus maintenance are uses more typically found within the industrial area of the City. The administrative office use is generally located within coamercial, office or industrial locations. 2. The facility will increase heavy vehicle traffic (i.e. buses, trucks) over what would normally be expected with residential development of the site. 3. If the School District did decide to sell off the property to the south, residential units might be located directly adjacent to the warehouse facility. 4. The warehouse building is a pre - engineered metal structure lacking in architectural treatment. Metal buildings are normally only allowed in the heavy industrial area. C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee a es ey, er , C'oleman) reviewed the proposal on November 19, 1987. At thdt time, the Committee felt that the structures proposed were not appropriate for the following reasons: 1. Administration. Building - The long ( *225 feet), linear design of the building was not compatible with the residential area. The building should be redesignbd in an alter-mtive manner (i.e. 'L' or V - shaped) to minimize the linear appearance. In addition, the building should incorporate two story elements to provide some vertical elements in the building design to further minimize the linear features. The Committee also recommended greater relief on the Beryl Street elevation. ai3 PLANNING COIC/ISSIOI IAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LOmA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1907 Page 5 2. Warehouse Building - The metal siding and roofing proposed were inappropriate within a residential area. The building should be redesigned to incorporate elements compatible with the residential area and to tie in with the administration building. Also, alternatives should be explored to try and minimize the height of the warehouse building to reduce its impact from the surrounding areas. 3. A decorative block wall should be provided around_ the perimeter of the site to screen the warehouse /service area. 4. The driveways located at the north and south ends of the administration building should be reduced to 30 feet in width and additional landscaping sho::id be provided at the ends of the building. S. Additional tree wells and landscape fingers should be incorporated into the design of the parking area. A median strip between the parking stalls may be used instead of the tree wells. 6. Dense landscape buffer should be provided along the north and south boundaries. 7. A five foot landscape setback should be provided along the east boundary. 8. Perimeter block walls should be constructed withii the Phase 2 area and permanent irrigation and landscaping should be installed with the Beryl Street right -of -way if the administration building construction has not commenced by the time Phase 1 is completed. The School District stated that budget restrictions, imposed by the state, have dictated the design of the project, in particular the metal warehouse. As a result of these concerns, the Design Review Committee did not recommeno approval. Subsequently, the applicant submitted revised plans for further discussion. The administration building elevations and flo,r plan had been modified to provide greater movement of the building, particularly along Beryl. The warehouse building, however, was still being proposed with a metal shell. The Design Review Committee (Emerick, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the plans on December 3, 1987 and recommended approval of the design subject to the following conditions: aw PLANNING COMiISSIO1 :AFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LUNA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Paga 6 1. Extensive landscaping should be provided around the perimeter to screen he warehouse building. 2. The roll -up door on he north side of the warehouse building should be deleted. 3. The spray booth should be locatad further to the east. he staffe report . Theyswill be o available prior btoihe Planning Commission me Ling. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee rev ewe project on ovmber 17, 1987 for compliance with City Committee to the addition of several conditions. Some of he conditions include: 1 foot drive aisls should be a cess for emergency roughout vehiclesh 2. The security gates should be equipped with knox boxes to permit emergency entry to he site. 3. The existing utilities on the project side of Beryl Street should be undergrounded. 4. and Street (rather from Base be Line). lted down from E. Tree Removal: Associated with he development, a Tree Removal em- s -ecessary for the removal of three trees in order to construct the improvments on site. The two eucalyptus trees at the southwest corner of he project will be removed in order to install the entry driveway and one eucalyptus tree along the east boundary will be removed when he transportation/ maintenance building (Phase 3) is constructed. In keeping with the Tree Preservation ordinance, the removal of these trees will require replacement planting with the largest nursery- grown stock available as determined by the Planning Commission or City Planner. F. Environmental Assessment: In completing he Environmental Checklist, Ste f has identified several areas that may impact properties in he area. These items, which were outlined in he Land Use section, include he industrial type uses associated wih he facility and he increased bus and trick traffic. With the exception of he paintt beeh,most of the industrial type cusbudtnaeecmtacere otaiewh the6rehrre gthry �1S PLANNING COKiISSIOL -*AFF WORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LONA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 7 reducing noise (assuming doors /windows are closed). Nevertheless, adverse noise impacts could be generated. 71re paint booth could be located at the east portion of the site rather than the northern portion to provide a greater separation. The increase in bus and truck traffic can be mitigated by limiting the access to the site from 19th Street. By doing so, the buses and trucks will have a minimal impact on Beryl by traveling the 350 feet rather than the 3,500 feet down to Base Line Road. The automobile traffic generated ollumeBof nBeryI Street. The metal building and ultimate proposed land use would crease an unattractive site incompatible with the residential neighborhood. in Ill. FACTS FOR eFINDINGS ; facts tcesupport the Planning findings gs must be made: A. objecttiivesrofostheuse Development accord Coda ,�and� the purposes Plan, the District in which the site is located. 8. That the wiltniot with theepublicthealth,psafety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. proposed the Development compplies with each of the appl provisions icable IV. CORRESPONDENCE: item has advertised ntDa o o a ProDer es new�p�puDlic hearingnoticeswere sent within 300 feet of the project site. V. co gQiENaATpI�ONI hearing to recommends reeceive all tinput and ntestimonny on the proposal. If, after receiving all input, the Planning Commission feels that the design and land use proposed is consistent with the Manning Commission General detervinesa thatdthe Development Code ot have any significante environmental impacts, staff should be directed t. prepare a/6 PLANNING C"ISSIOA'. AFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LOHA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 8 BB:SH:vc Attachments: Exhibit -A- - Site Utilization Exhibit -B- - Site Plan Exhibit -C- - Phasing Plan Exhibit -D- - Conceptual Grading Exhibit -E- - Building Elevations Exhibit -F- - Tree Removal Plan -Z17 I' n I O O lCu7 N.nro4.td M&wub W G .aw.w. wynvi�r r.+vv � O / rygr r Q LeGWD ® aW yut �LML CITY OF RANCHO CL;C-�.NION GA �l8 U I.,., t -. rrE\l, CaP 87_y/ TITLE: Si li� /rzp on E\HIPJT- A SLgLL. r_ V '`K)RTI I CITY OF RANCM CUC- kMO�GA PLA.NNM. DIVES ;2i9 ITEM, TITLE, EXHIRIT. �° SCALL• Qz CITY OF RANG -10 CUCAMO.N;GA FLANNI \G q \'LSIO(r' m_%a Ai- Trruc 1*5-e Z EN: HIBIT-__G / SC_.XLL._ .2 .7A r y >yry� y • >I. � %l.lvyYt•G y II • '�yl,�f.�, �n� ifli !! 'JYSIrat��i CITY OF RANCHO CG'C -kNnNGA PLA -NNING M ISION X21 rrL%ly alp 61 ✓1/ TITLES Z*9de EXHIBIT- C Z SCALL. CITY OF RANCHO CLE-kMO.INGA PLANNING DiVL4M Zzz Mai, CuP117- s// TITLE, E\HIHIT, O SI;ALE. Uz CrTy of RANCHO CUCA,Mo PLA.\NENC, pp`IS „FN _ zv'o8r- �i TM.E lee oy_ls,� EXHIBIT, CITY (T RANCW CUC- :,Njo� PLANNM D(\'ISM .?;25 rrE\n i 4// _ TITLE: rCC e'✓nOM�/ E.\HIRM -L _ SCAL REEOLUTIOs NO. 88.01 A R230LUTION 01 TEE PLANfRNG COSD(ZSSION 01 TED CITY 01 RANCHO CUCRKONGA DENYING TEE ISSDANCM 01 A CONDITIONAL USE PBGMIT, NO. 57 -41, TO DA9BLOP A sCHOOL DISTRICT FAL'ILITY CONSISTING OF AN ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, NARBEOUSB BDILDING AND TRANSPORTATION/ MAINTENANCE BUILDING ON PROPERTY NITEIN TEE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON TEE EAST 62DB OF BERYL STREET, SOUTH 01 MINBTEENTB STREET, RANCHO CUcsxoWA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IA 1PORT TURBO/. A. Recitals. District has filed an appion Alta ma requOst)ng(the issuance ofcaoConditional Use Permit, No. 87-41, to approve the development of a school district facility as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request shall be referred to as the "Application." ) On the City ofiRanchoDCucamonga� conduct ticed Commission dipublic of hearing on the Application and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iii) All legal prerequicites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. the Planning Covmissionoduring het above-referenced ppublicad to hearing, including written and Oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: acres of land The ResidentialaDistricttlocatedS on the east side of Beryl Street, south of Nineteenth Street; .3(p Resolution No. Page 2 b. Ths p• :opsrty to the north of the subject site is located within a Low Residential District and is currently developed with a church facility. The property to the south of the subject site is owned by the Applicant Alta Loma School District, is located within a Low Residential District and is currently vacant. The property to the east of the subject site is located within a Low Re.0dential District and is currently being developed with single family residences presently under construction. The property to the west of the subject site is within a Low Residential District and is currently developed with single family residences and certain vacant property; C. The Application has been submitted to allow the construction of a. school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, including machina and carpentry shops and a spray -paint booth, e. 15,600 square foot transportation/ maintenance buildint and related park..ng and storage areas. School district facilities are permitted within the Low Residential District with the approval of a conditional use permit; d. The Application as contemplated would contradict the goals and objectives of both the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would promote a detrimental condition to tl;e persons and properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject: 1ite, for the reasons as followu: Development Code to allow thepestablvehmenttof schoolldistrictd facilities within Low Residentlal Districts pursuant to a conditional uan permit contemplates the dsys.opment of passive and low intensive facilities such as classroom sites and administrative offices. The Application as contemplated conflicts with such goals and policies and is incompatible with the surrounding land uses by the ;squashed inelus:on of the more intensive industrial uses such as the transportation /maintenance building, the machine and carpent.rI shop and the spray paint booth; (ii) The Application as contemplated would be Inconsistent and incompatible rith the low intensity residential and church facility uses lmmedLately surrounding the subject site and would be materially detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of those parsons in the immediate vicinity of the subject site in the following respects: (1) the oporation of the vehicle �2� Resolution No, Page 3 maintenance facility, together with the machine and carpentry shop, would generate excessive noise and vibration in the area; M tie spray paint booth would generate both unwarranted odors and potential hazardous contanination by airborne spray paint partieulanta; (3) necessary security lighting to protect the proposed facility would result in excessive nighttime glare to the surrounding residential uses; and (4) evidcnce produced at the public hearing demonstrated that tho adverse effects Identified herein could not be successfully mitigated by the inclusion of development conditions; increase heavy vehicle)trafficpfrom truces andnbusueaondt hued nearby Btreetm which are normally limited to residential traffic, thus contributing to excessive vehicle noise and vibration and a dangerous and confusing traffic circulation pattern in the immediate vicinity of the subject site, the detrimental effects Of which cannot be successfully mitigated; administrative office andTwareh useebuilding are aesthetically . incompatible with the single family residential uses and church facility surrounding the subject Bite. The adtinietration building presents along, massive and linear design (approximately edntial single familyhdwellings tincompatible t immediate vicinity. The warehouse building is a pre - engineered metal structure which would only be allowed, if at all, in the heavy industrial areas of the city; opposition to the 1lpplicat bstantial public testimony in by existing residents in the immediate vicinity of t elsubgecting site (both by oral testimony and signed petitions), and such public opposition and the detrimental effecta identified herein will cumulatively increase due to the fact that the immediate vicinity is continuing to develop with single family residences and the Bite immediately to the south of the proposed development de eloped s the Alta requiring lreqtthu development of further single family residences or the expansion of the proposed uses onto such site. 3. this Commission Hduring nthe eab substantial e- referenced dDecembers9,�t1987o hearing and upon the specific findings of fact sot forth in 3 Resolution No. Page 4 paragraphs 1. and 2, above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes an follows: a. The Application as prop--mad in not in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; b. The Application as proposed will be detrimental to the public health, satwty or welfare and will be materially injurious to proportion and improvemonts in the immediatt vicinity; and C. The evidence presented to 'this Commission tae identified substantial potential adverse effects associated with the request specified in the Application. 4. Based upon the findings and aanclusiois sat forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, above, this Commission hereby denies the Application. S. The Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 1988. pLANNING OMMIS1SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA tar / cN s , Chairmen By: a puty Secretaryy 1, BRAD BITLLER, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted by the Planning Coamission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coamission hold on the 13th day of January, 1988, by the following vote, to wit: 4 r- 1.19 ri, a 14 Irt 1'r I:, Resolution No. Pnge 3 AYES: COMlI'SISIONERS: TOLSTOY, CHITIEA, BLAXESLEY, CHMEA. MCNIEL ' NOES: COMIISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMIIBSIONERS: NONE S \133 \PCRESOL \RC 6.2.1\ g .7 30 RESPONSE TO HEARING BY RANCH) cuamoiiGA PLANNING COMMISSION - December 9, 1987 SUBJECT: Development of a school district facility (warehouse, transportation/ .? maintenance buildings) located on the cast side of Beryl Street; south of 19th Street APP: 20204101 and 42. Balanced growth is important to the city of Rancho Cucamonga. In keep- ing with this philosophy, it seems unsuitable to consider development of the above facility in a solely residential area. With the exception of a church, this area is now and continuing to be developed as a residential, bearoom community. A school district facility ` (warehouse, transpor ion /maintenance buildings) which is going to generate noise, air pollution and traffic congestion needs to be located in a comm- ercial or industrial area. Beryl and 19th are already highly impacted traffic corridors and more busses, trucks and automobiles would only congest them Y more. At the present time foot traffic on Beryl is imperiled enough as stu- dents walk north to Alta Loma Jr. High and south to Alta Loma ft High. The residents of Hamilton, Zircon, Opal, Amber Court, Vineyard, Beryl Streets and the surrounding area, as well as the Hamilton Ranch complex, object t*) this development on this site. As concerned citizens for a better Rancho Cuca,-anga, we ask that the Planning Commission seek alternative sites for this type o` project. ?31 1 Firm /iK 896.1 f�am /fai... z,,•nwa 67 12, urno J Q,uv . 6721 &, cam poi * PAc- (073/ 214es vAn /yma vA#1�4 67P 'ZrRco �? .3 ?, 99 d� * 4 675/ Zrcrs'( /� cJ s�nvgo lm c2,.,•i. r,,.4- 9110 Gt °Jl% � /rveyr��. 47.� ja mieC,4 9qn C km w2p • & �j ,. 6 7`� C . �x /. -1;2 P q/ /(079d i% a J 46U zl f ` -c0. `o'i6YY%o- CUA c�/ otz c'rt'�r7 `l -101 �yWOA.1MN�� cA 9i,ol AL&Fg ( 61So 6Q u„r�a 0,74 AL7',* 1nu+lf @/} ? /?a/ .4 � 676Y ajml.4c, Cap a -& Zorw , ca 91761 L�CC�ti i� S X33 ±y. di'Jf.cui.• ; jEr.�.�i� -e.i. 'io a i t4:+�.,.�. -✓ - Tiln�`?�lts �i. ��t9.�L.. 9o.9G F�at�.•. Q.c,. .?j7z m Q o� �(itrtr4 ,.6! Co, 9 a O/ Ala m�� A • L qp6 /A � µ -1- t)gmi(-toAu St r} L +� � C7ftLLc 5 oY 4 AAMi LTOAJ ST ,9 L If ?r/,A ��iro �� asarsrawlt�w 8177 9ao6 ��u S+�s2 �..•/i6v Jf ,74-ft4, C..W 3 0 F3 o xxn ryy «� Cuq w )d #-&a.. !a93o 23=/ ,I 8 It I• T t, DA. L; TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 20, 1988 City Council and City Manager im Russell H. Maguire, City Enginear Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Order to Vacate a Portion of the Non Vehicular Access Rights on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, Between Spruce And Elm Avenues RECOMUDATION: It is ordering recommended vacationtof a po�tonuoflnon -v attached resolution dedicated on Parcel Map 6725. Background /Analysis At its December 16, 1987, meeting, the City Council declared its intention to vacate a portion of the non - vehicular access rights as dedicated on Parcel Map 6725, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues. Parcel Map 10617 wp7as approved byp the Planning Commission on November 10, 1987. ariVacatlon roach was of the subject accessserights will allow accesscto Parcels 2 and 3. Notices have been posted at the site and the public hearing date was published in the newspaper. When vacated, that portion of non - vehicular access will revert back to adjacent properties. ResAfu bmitted, RHM -235 RESOLUTION No. 8 8 - 0 Y,-) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMfONGA, COUNTY OF SAX BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTICM OF THE NON- VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES Council Of HERE ACit yyofeRanchooCucamonga6declaredeitsnintennttiion toy vacate ahe portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the i hour of 7:30 p.m, on January 20, 1g88, In the Lions Park ,.ommunity Center Building, located at 91G1 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time ` and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and cWHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. follows: BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as ! i 1 SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that a porticn of-fFe non - vehicular access rights on Foothill Boulevard is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No.V -075 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit •A•, and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and excep ons, any, for existing utilities on record. to be recorCe l "n3theTofficerofsthelCounty RecorderiOf Sany Bernardino eCounty, California. SECTION 4: The Clerk shalt certify to the passage and adoption of this reso utl%n, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. 236- Q= oa �� U � O x U i:.arr.r ��rwtwH„i EXHIBIT -A^ DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT REFERENCE: PARCEL MAP 10617 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA REQUEST FOR VACATION OF 35 FEET OF NON— VEHICULAR ACCESS (PER PM 6725. PMB 67/4 -7) ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 66) BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BEING THE MID -POINT OF THE 35 FOOT VACATION, DISTANT 986.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SPRUCE AVENUE. MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF JAY LINE AND ITS PROLONGATION, FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SPRUCE AVENUE. "r-, tau 12502 * A/ 3 -3r -y L k CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRDM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Nastman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYIROHMENTAL ASSESSMENT iui0 n -.v - w r, ur . 6nw umm m A - A request xo �id the Vevelopment s r c map rom Low Density identi6l (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Medium -High sity Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to ustrial Specific Plan, General Industrial, Subarea 1, 4.31 acres of land located north of 8th Street, east Grova Avenue and west of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-541 - and 207- 251 -12. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN 'M al- - - A request to pet .c an o expand Subarea 1 to amend lude 4.31 acres of land generally located east of Grove Avenue, north of Sth Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN: 207 - 541 -60 and 207- 251 -12. I. RECOMMUTATiON: The Planning Commission recommends approval of evDTpmeni 'DT-strict Amendment 87 -10 and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 87 -03. II. BACKGROUND: Staff reviewed the proposal and recommended approval to the P1 anning Commission. The reasons for the favorable recommendation were as follows: A. Current Development Standards would restrict the developable aria for each parcel to less than 17 feet thereby unreasonably restricting the property for development. B. Because of the existing surrounding land uses the sites are not acceptable for residential development. C. The Development District Amendment and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment would bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan. 239 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ODA 87 -10 - City of Rancho Cucaagnga ISPA 87 -03 City of Rancho cucuonga Page °2 20, 1988 Distrt Planning dme�fand Industrial Specific Plano Amend Amendment atotteir November 25, 1907 public hearing meeting. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Planning Commission issued a Negative ec arm on ase upon s atf findings. IY. CDRRESPONDENCE: This item has been n e a advertised as a public hearing e ort newspaper and notices sent to all property owners w n eet or the project site. 4Respully s to BB:CN :vc Attachments: Exhibit 'A' -November 25, 1937 Planning C�i;;sion Staff Report and Exhibits Exhibit •O• Exhibit 'O• _ Resolution No. 87 -206 Resolu Ordinance for ODA 87-10n No. 01 -201 ordinance for ISP 87 -03 ayo I? CITY OF RW..CHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Noverber 25, 198': TO: Chairman and Meakers of the Planning Co®lssicn FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chr% Nestman, Assistant Flcnner FIA1 SUBJECT: ENVIROiMTAL 1T AS� -ssm 6^ AND DEYELOPYB.NT DISTRICT axn a ere oumen s r c reques o Reslduntia1 (2 -4 dwelling units per acre andLMedium -High Density Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) ti irdustrfal Specific Plan, General Industrial, Subarea 1, for 4.31 acres of land, located north of 8th Street, east of Grove Avenue and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207 -541 -60 and 207 - 251 -12. ENYIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN maeva.trc A request to nc � include 4.31 acres of land generally located east of Grove Avenue, north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207- 541 -60 and 207- 251 -12. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: North side of 8th Street, between Grove and Baker. B. Site Area: 4.31 acres (gross) total. Parcel A - 2.00 acres Parcel B - 2.31 acres C. Existing Zoning: Parcel A - Medium -H1gh Residential (MH, 14-24 dwelling units per acre) Parcel B - Low Residential (L, 2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. Existing Land Use: Eoth parcels are currently vacant. .7 4l ITEMS R,S lb - - PLANNING COMMISSIC ;rAFF REPORT DDA 87 -10 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ISPA 87 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 25, 1987 Page 2 E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Nor - s ng par n s and Single Family Homes, Madium- High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and Loa Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single Family Residential; R -1 (Ontario) East - vacant; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 1 Nest - vacant; M-2 (Ontario) F. General Plan Dcnraa t ionn s strial eg Torect e - North - Medium -High and Low Residential South - R -1 (Ontario) East - General industrial West - N -2 (Ontario) G. Site Characteristics: The subject site is vacant with no vege on, ere s a 2 -3 foot grade separation between the site and Bth Street. A railroad main line runs along the north property boundary east and west. Thare are existing apartments and single family residences on properties adjacent to the north as well as on the south side of 8th Street. Properties east and west are undeveloped. II. ANALYSIS: A. Site Oevelopability: The possibility of develo ing either parcel un�err a existing zoning districts 1°s limited. Imposing residential development standards (i.e. setbacks and requiring additional dedication for 8th Street improvements) would only allow an approximate 15 foot area for home construction under th3 'Low' designation and the -MH- designation. Refer to the table below: Parcel A Parcel B .MH- -L- Average lot depth 75 ft. 75 ft. Additional street dedication -14 ft. -14 ft. Parking adjustment +12 ft. +12 ft. Front yard setback -45 ft. -37 ft. Rear yard setback -15 ft. -20 ft. Buildable area 13 16 24Y P1,AiiXING COMCIiYIOF RANCHO CUCk1DNGA DDA 87-10; CITY OF RANCHO C'JCA'OMGA ISPA 8arD Novest. 25, 1987 page 3 The Property to the north is developed spar en and single ftmlly homes. B. Surroundoin Land Use: ro orties and these developments 1s the w the subject D D is h s1ce1 separating and Santa Fe Railroad line. the northerly Atchison Topeka a attempt ro ernes. barrier would oh isrto any project on these two developed residential p across 8th Street, The properties to the south. with single family homes which back on to 8th Street wt a six foot block wall running adJacen to not sidewalk deslg° 4 entire length of 8th Avenuo• This type sites north and south of encourage interaction between the two 8th Street. vacant, and are zoned for t industrial buildings were approved for The DfODertlos east and zest are Carnatsslon in Nay, 1987. industrial usesite iby the Planning built Physical the easterly of ertstln9 an residential Therefore. because tles, Y x111 be an island'. project built on Parcel surrounding A' . proper staff interpretation has been Duth bparoels, General Plan A^ can be re gar ^��1° General Plan ahte,led an the land use map as Although it is not specif1ca11Y a logical pro Losslon General Industrial District, Therefore. the proposed continued for all properties south of the railroad tracks to the xastern boundary o4 the City• endment Industrial Development District the zoning p�aend«Rnt w 0 d bring lot size General Plan• the minimum Half-acre Lot Size Both parcels confer* to rester. arcels are 2e�itied or within the LoQ� Lament for the General Industrial District. t sites are arequirearmalotbodepth is not sP feet is parcel width ilnedr feet of Parcels have approximately 1.250 industrial Specific Pla ^• ° minimum required. Both p be 8th Street frontage. ant D /strict change Rail Service Should the Dev;s ion, rail service would be the planning Comm industrial rece�n ee Sy the general Provisions of the which would required it would nbge Specific Plan. However, because of h�o et�estwlth buitdl is be requireftoldevelop these prop tracroject which s virtually impossible rejects which that would accomodete rail service. fie P Street do not approved on the east S d °tarthore east n 8thre tr are already {fically rovlde for rail service spec 2`43 PLANNING COMMISSIC AAFF REPORT DDA 87 -10 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ISPA 87 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November ZS, 1987 Page 4 III. ENYIRO11M AL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Initial Study rn ewe rev e tnvironmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of thn Proposed amendment and district changes. It is anticipated that any issue of vehicular impacts may be successfully mitigated at the project level. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Shoulc the Commission upon examination of the eve opmen s r ct Amendment and Industrial specific Plan Amendmmnt decide that changes would promote the land use goals and purpose* of the General Plan, it would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the following findings are necessary for approval: A. The amendments do not conflict with the land use policies of the General Plan; and S. The amendments do promote the goals of the Land Use Elements; and C. The amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. V. CORRESPONDENCE: this item has been advertised as a public hearing in the a e ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a proper y owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Medium -High Residential parce do ow esidentfal parcel be changed to Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 1, and that the Industrial Specific Plan be modified to reflect the addition of these two parcels within Subarea 1. If the Commission concurs with this recommendation, adoption of the attached Resolutions recommending approval to the City Council of the DCVI:iopMent District Amendment and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Mull ed, ad 8 , C anner RB:CH :te Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Location Map Exhibit '8' - Parcel Identification Exhibit 'C' - Land Use and Zoning Exhibit 'D' - Western ISP Boundary Resolutions of Approval .74y cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA K.ANNWG D1VEM NO ;?yS - -- Wza:s';I CITY CF NORM RAP.LHO CLr AMONGA mgt, AB7-VD pA 87 0 BANNING DIVDUN Tnui IQ��t171F/Carrn E?CHIBfis_j�p SCALE,J&�� - . • .. ! ra. , •.. F r.� � .' `' ,r. .. �.. .,. i��'�'i- .4?"f. .r:a% 1. - RESOLUTION N0. 87 -206 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMIISSION APPROVING OEVELOPNENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 87 -10, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FRON MEDIUM -HIGH MD LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTi OF 8TH STREET EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AMD WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APR 207 - 541 -60 AND 207 - 251 -12 A. Recitals. Development The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for pment District Change No. 87 -10 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Change request is referred to as "the application% Rancho Cuciamonganconduccttead a5duly8noti cedppublic8heaaringsonnthe pplication and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) Ali legal prerequisites have occurred. to the 86op4lon of this Resolution B. Resolution. - NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning CommfssiOn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: set forthlin theeiRecitalis z Part A.ebOf Specifically s Resolution narettrueaand correctacts during the 2. above- referenced anearingnon presented to 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this CcMission hereby specifically finds as follows: Street and west of Baker Ave uetwithaapstreet frpontage of located pproximate y 2,500 feet and lot depth of approximately 80 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The adjacent property to the north of the subject site is a railroad line, the property to the south of that site consists of single family homes, the properties to the east and west are vacant. (c) The property's dimensions are in compliance with the lot size requirements of the Industrial Specific Plan; and render the property un eveloptble, and lines for residential districts aY9 PLANNING CO MISSIL. RESOLUTION NO. DDA 87 -10 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIMONGA November 25, 1987 Page 2 develo (a) The properties are suitable for general industrial paent given the physical characteristics of the property and adjoining land uses; and general plan deslgnatThe property is not in conformance with its reciprocal 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, ani compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed district change would have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and _ (c) That the propposed district change 1s in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby find! and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends lssuanco of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of November, 1987, Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 87 -03. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Development District Amendment No. 87 -03. (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adooted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to She City Council. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. DSO PLANNING COWISSIO, .IESOLUTION N0. ODA 87 -10 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 25, 1987 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI'Y OF RANCNn r:r� w Rancho Cucuuonr� DePuty Secretary of the Planning Co�misslon of the City of regularly introduced herby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and City of Rancho Cuca n Passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the on the 25th day of NOY". at a regular Watiny of the Planning Cwmisston held 1987. by the following vote- to-wft: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY a$/ ■ RESOLUTION NO. 87 -207 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CCMNISSION APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONE LOCATED NORTH OF 8711 STREET EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND NEST OF BARER AVENUE - APR 207- 541 -60 AND 207- 251 -12 A. Recitals. (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 87 -03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter to this Resolution, the subject Industrial Specific Plan Amendment requdst is referred to as 'the application'. (11) 0n November 25, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (111) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Caeission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth In the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on November 25, 1987, including written and oral staff reports together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue with a street frontage of approximately 2,500 feet and lot depth of approximately 80 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The adjacent property to the north of the subject site is a railroad line, the property to the south of that site consists of single family homes, the properties to the east and west are vacant. (c) The property's dimensions are in compliance with the lot size requirements of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) Setbacks from property lines for residential districts render the property undevelopable; and PLANNING CO:MISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 87 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA November 25, 1987 Page 2 (e) The properties are suitable for general industrial development given the physical characteristics of the property and adjoining land uses; and (f) The property is not in conformance with its reciprocal general plan designation. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 abovo, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terns of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed district change would have signffi cant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered to c liance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Californfa Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of November, 1987, Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 87 -03. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 87 -03. (e) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the edoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOUITION NO. ISPA 87 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA November Z5, 1987 s Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary a: the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetiny of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, SLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY :?Sy ORDINANCE NO. 3.35 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -10, REQUCSTINB A CHANGE 19 THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM -HIGH AND LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF 81H STREET, EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND NEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN: 207 - 641 -60 AND 207 -251- 12 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of November, 1987, the Planning Coeoission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recomended to the City Council adoption or a change in the district designation from Medium -High and Low Residentiai to Industrial Specific Plan. WHEREAS, on the 20th day of January, 1988, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hag made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed District Chango would not have significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed Olstriet Change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamnga City Council has found that this project 01`1- -nor-create a significant adverse impact nn the environment and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 20, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65750 to 65855 of the California Goveriment Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamnga hereby approves on the 20th day of January, 1988, Developeknt District Amendment 87 -10 changing the district designation from Medium -High and Low Residential to Industrial Specific Plan for those properties located north of 8th Street, east of Grove Avenue, west of Baker Avenue and south of an existing Santa Fe Railroad line. .P 5,:S* a z ORDINANCE NO. -33{ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNONGA APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AIiENDIIEHY 87 -03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUDAREA 1, LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET, EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND NEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN: 207 - 541 -60 AND 207- 251 -12 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of November, 1987, the Planning Casnissfon held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recommended to the City Council adoption of a an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan requesting an addition to Subarea 1, located north of 8th Street, east of Grove Avenue and west of Baker Avenue. WHEREAS, on the 20th day of January, 1988, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. findings: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has made the following 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the oroposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed Amendment would not have significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found that this project wTTT n= create a sigh flcant adverse trpact on the environment and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 20, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 55850 to 65855 of the California Goverrvient Code, that the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 20th day of January, 1988 Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 87 -03, adding those properties located north of 8th Street, cast of Grove, west of Baker Avenue and south of the Santa Fe Railroad line to Subarea 1 of the Industrial Specific Plan. r 1 .i5(o 4. R Lx:efi i CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 34 FOR TRACT NO. 13444, DR 85 -06 AND OR 86 -39 (VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 IECOMMENDATIUM: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 34 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolufior ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 34 to Street Lighting Maintenance District NoNo. 1 for Tract No. 13444, uR 85 -06 and OR 66 -39 (various locations . the City). The developer of the subject developments has been notified of the public hearing by Dail. The attecnc4 resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively appined by Resolution No. 97 -652. ResD dTly submitted, RHM:JA:dlw Attachments .2S7 1 ) J .y s •i:,J i CITY JF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Councl and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 6Y: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE HCRK IN COMIECTIO:i N1TH ANNEXATION 00. 34 FOR TRACT NO, 134,V, DR 85 -06 AND DR 86 -39 (VARIOUS L0'ATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTL,AMCE DISTRICT M0. 1 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City CounciT approve the attached resolution Grdering the work in connectian with Annexation No. '4 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer'. .eport. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in Connection with 5nnexatlon No. 34 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract No. 13444, DR 85 -06 and DR 86 -39 (various locations throughout the City), (he developer of the subject developments has been notifled of the public hearing by mail The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87 -652. Respectf y submitted, RHM: Attachments .?S 9' RESOLUTION N0. 1V _Dv / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 34 TO STREET LIGHTING 14AINTEMCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13444, OR 85 -05 and DR 86 -39 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of December, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -653 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 34 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of intention No. 87 -653 was duly and legally published in the time, form and canner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption there:+f, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of kvrovement ", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, tanner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, noticta of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the Improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -653, according to the names and addresses of such owners a; the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed to the timre, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Maiiing on file to the orrice or the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1• It 1s hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -653, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracisiiave been occupied. zq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Tract No. 13444, DR 85 -06 and DR 86 -39 SECTION 1. Authority for ReoerL This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1. Division 15 of California h Streets (Landscaping andLight ngAct of 1912). Code, State of SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined ets withian said developments a tes well as an the lots aid will have adierectl upon ll lo y abutting the street lights. York to be provided for with the assessments established bf the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light stp ets) assshownaonrthe Lighting DistrictdAltasaMapcwhii htis on file with the City Engineer. Iogrovement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specffications for street lighting have been prepared by the and street stipulated in he the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby :made to the subject tract cep or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. Tl.e plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plates and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair. removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement,. providing for the illumination of the subject area. .'j SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assesseents will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvments (single family, multi- family, condominf as and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional landeIn ind strial, commercial andhinstitutionalmareas derives the some benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. i is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamp Size* Lamps YTD Annex No 34 New Lacp Total 5800L --- 444 9500L 477 - -- 477 16,000L 16 - -- 16 22,000L 3 - -- 3 27,500L 6 6 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamp Size Total Laws Rate Mo's Total Annual Maint. Cost 5800L 9500L 444 477 X $ 8.93 X x 12 S 47,579.04 16,000L 16 $10.16 X $12.08 X X 12 12 58,155.84 2,319.36 22,000L 3 X $13.84 x 12 498.24 27,500 6 X $15.31 X 12 2,939.52 Total Annual Maint. Cost 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation Assessment Units this annex per page 4 Total Assessment Units `i'i P(o $111,492.00 14,888 302 15,190 L 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost o. o n n s ct $111,1 4992 , ;7.34 /year /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained to Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Mafntenance District No. 1', Annexation No. 34. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assess®ents. a01- COUNT 'A' 4, Properties and improvements to be lnclue,d within Annexation No. 34 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: 1 ,. Assess. No. of La s to be Annexed ° Project Acreage Unit i Zone i TR 13444 - -- 176 --- --- --- - -- --- OR 85-06 (248 i .5) 124 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- (PM1 o 834 Zone 2 OppRcc86 -39 1.0 2 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 2 of (PM18060) _ 302 - - w 41. Div STREET LIGHTING SS AINTE14A CER DISTRICT N0.1 ANKYATION NO. 24 5/TE CITY of RANCHO cLrAm IV A A "AS.O(. •�� ENGINEERING DIMS- - VICINITY t;+AP N ��S STM srun i 9� i !AM MIWR Y71 Y 5/TE CITY of RANCHO cLrAm IV A A "AS.O(. •�� ENGINEERING DIMS- - VICINITY t;+AP N ��S ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, ANNEXATION NO. 34 ?46 & MM N.Y. PARCH sZ a A...f.. gu�•ei,. i . V V Lou�a M ..tNfs isac R.. N D �� No e V144.o.c4 ""IG 7..f 9IS vi.,/ 7ICV WA LV 9TH'STREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1f0Id(�A w COU'VTY OF SAN BEBNARDINO ,\ STATE OF CALIFORNIA --- 7 XT W a 3 W 'L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONKICTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 FOR OR 8649, NORTHWEST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND HELMS AVENUE (INDUSTRIAL /CO►lERCIAL) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RECOMMENDATION: It is recoomended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGRDUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the *ark in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for DR 86 -39, northwest corner of 9th Street and Helga Avenue (Industrial /Coasaercial). The developer of the subject project has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineers Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87 -654. Respe f submitted, , RHM:JAA:diw Attachments .? I. S. 3 i x -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 FOR DR 85 -39, NORTHWEST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND HELMS AVENUE (INDUSTRIAL /COMMERCIAL) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RECOMMENDATI01i: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for OR 86 -39, northwest corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue (Industrial /Commercial). The developer of the subject project has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87 -654. Respect ' submitted, r RAM:JAA:dlw Attachments .( �t Z. RESOLUTIM N0. g Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING VE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION No. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 86 -39 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of December, 1987, adopt i;s Resolution of Intention No. 87 -655 to orde- the ther -In described work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -655 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed •notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and nuaber as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of th^ City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -655, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Falling on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering -' the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth, and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -655, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; an-r— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's eft are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trace Faive been occupied. ? 7o Cir, OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Englnr^r's Report for Street Lighting • 'ntenance District No. 6 A'. :ton No. 7 for DR 66 -39 SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report 1s in compliance with tha requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new 4valopments Into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furatshing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on mayor streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as sham on the Lighting District Altas Nap which 1s on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas to the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, ramoval or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. r - SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement : construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it +s estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes wilt be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements an major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout thn City. It has been determined that one acre of land in Industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Fneray Cost: No, of Lamps Lamps annex New Lamp Lamm Size* YTO No 7 Total 5800E 41 1 42 9500L 2 -.- 2 16,COOL --- --- --- 22,00O .-- ___ - -- 27.SOOL L *Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamp.•. Rate Ma's Maint. Cost 5800L 42 X S 8.93 X 12 $4,500.72 9500L 2 X $10.16 X 12 • 243.84 16,0001. - -- X $12.03 X 12 0 22,0001. - -- X $13.84 X 12 0 27.500 - -- X $15.31 X 12 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost $4,744.56 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 260 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 2 Total Assessment Units 262 ry .; .< X7.1 3. Cost per Assessment unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost $4,744 ,56 =18.10 /year /unit o.a n ts in Oistr c Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 60, Annexation No. 7. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment all uniitsvwwiitthhin the Districtrand found to be of shallnbeaequalefor each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council z6opts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines !o form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. :v g `,,, 213 EXHIBIT •A' PP ertles and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Nalntenance District 6: Assess. No. of L s to be Annexed Project Acreage Unit __ . Zone 1 Zone 2 OR 86 -39 1.0 2 1 - -- . -- . -- ... (;Cl 2 of N 8060) d ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 7 PAA /L Mht c 6- PARCA sp W A.ttit. 2 ".e1,. 'a vV Y H = J LOUIS M so` y� _W O 1406 Ib. N-LL No flt UtLAMQ, C• 711/ 9tl- Z- ar 9TH STREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A COUNTY OF 8AN i3 STATE OF CAuw=A - N b. h it77 °� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Subject: Recommendation to establish a 35 MPH speed limit on Lemon Avenue between Sapphire Street and Archibald Avenue RECOMMMOATIOB• It is recommended that Section 10.20.010 and Section 10. ?0.020 of the Municipal Code be amended to provide for a speed limit of J5 MPH on Lemon Avenue between Sapphire Street and Archibald Avenue. BACKGROUPWARALYSIS• In response to public concern about speeding on Lemon Avenue, applicable State and City law was reviewed and it was determined that, under Section 40801 -40905 of the California Vehicle Code, the speed limit must be established according to a traffic survey as specified by the California Department of Transportation, if radar speed enforcement is to be used. Further, on the portion between Jasper Street and Beryl Street, a limit set by such a survey is necessary for any form of enforcement. A survey as requiree Above has been conducted on Lemon Avenue. The survey involved the determination of the prevailing speed of existing traffic by the use of radar, an analysis of the recent accident history and a search for any conditions not apparent to drivers which would require a reduced speed. The results of this survey are summarized in the attached table. After review of these results, it was found that prevAiling (85 percentile) speeds vary from 39 to 45 MPH, the safety record of the street is well within expected levels and there are no unusual conditions not apparent to drivers. .276 , �a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LEMON AVENUE SPEED LIMIT JANUARY 20, 1988 y , PAGE 2 r. CONCLUSION• It is recoarnended thas a speed limit be established that nould be considered reasonable by most of the drivers on the street and still provide for enforcement which will be effective against speeders. A 35 MPH limit would fit these needs and, as was experienced on Hillside Road, may resu t in a lowering of the orevailing speed on the street. Respectf ly submitted, f RNM:PAR:pam Attachment: Speed Survey 1 1 Soli v 1't D-78 e z r B b Ell �¢p�n d° -n 'den 5 n� r p"? rpi RUE ep �h ie r e i e g a a i i E Cqb r aaa d�6 fig Jip if ago §_ A11 RAI .8. a �zc 37: 833i X79 ORDINANCE NO. e33 % f7Mrob Iajy AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CNINCIL--OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. CTION ]0.20.010 AND SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO cuc&v4NGA CITY CODE. REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREET., A. Recitals City Council may, by Ordinance, set prima ofcie speed 2limitsruponeany that ortion of arty street not a state highwayy. ifhaiTraffic Eiihu nCaga and traffic survy. o certain streetswthin the City of Ranchoucmon which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part 8, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. Ordinance NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.20.010 hereby Is amendcl to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.010 In, reasin2 state seed limit in certain zones. It is determined by CTU-Co—u—ncl, resolution and upon a as s o an eng neering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law upon the following streets is less than is necessary for safe operation of vehicles thereon by reason of the designation and sign posting of the streets as through highways and (or) by reason of widely spaced intersections, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be set forth In this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice thereof_ Name of Street or Portion Affected Declared Facie Speed Li itima (MPH) 1. Amethyst Street - Oaseline to and 35 Q -;v CCSR Ordinance January 20, 1988 Page 2 2. Arrow Route - Grove to Baker 45 3. Beryl Street - Base Line to 800' 4. north of Leann Avenue 40 Hellman Ave. - AltP. Loma Drive to 500' north of Manzanita Drive 35 S. 6• Lemon Ave. - Beryl St. to Archibald Ave. 35 7• Lemon Ave. - Sapphire St, to Jasper St. Ninth Street - Grove to Baker 35 35 8. Ramona Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to 19th St. 35 9. Sapphire Street - Lemon to Banyan 40 10. Vineyard Avenue - Carnelian to Church 40 (Ord. 169 S1(part), 1982: Ord. 399 S1, 1980: Ord. 49 S5.0, 1978) (f) The twenty -five (25) miles per hour speed does not facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic. which are most (it) The opiate tosfacilitaateathe orderly facie and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof. (111) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets. (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state low maximum seed. it 15 determined by ounc rese u on an upon a as s a a eengineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon su:h streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hererof: - CCSR Ordinance January 20. 1988 Page 3 a 8a. aW Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 1. Archibald Avenue - Banyan to North end 50 2. Archibald Avenue - Fourth Street to Banyan Street 45 3. Arrow Route - Baker to Haven 45 4. Banyan Street from Beryl Street to London Avenue 3S S. Banyan Street - from west City limits to Beryl Street 40 6. Base Line Road - Carnelian to Haven 40 7. Base Line Rord - Hermosa to Haven 45 S. Base Line Road - Nest City limits to Camel tan 45 9. Beryl Street - Banyan to end 45 10. Beryl Street - 800' north of Lemon to Banyan 40 11. Carnelian Street - Foothill to end 45 12. Center Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Church Street 40 13. Church Street - from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40 14. Church Street - Haven to Elm 40 15. Eighth Street - Grove to Haven 45 16. Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill to Highland 45 17. Grove Avenue - Eighth to Foothill 40 18. Haven Avenue - Highland to Nilson 50 19. Hellman Avenue - Foothill to Alta Loma Dr. 35 20. Hellman Avenue - 500' north of Manzanita to Valley View 21. Hellman Avenue - 6th to Foothill 45 22. Highland Avenue - Amethyst to Archibald 35 23. Highland Avenue - from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue 35 24. Highland Avenue - fmm Hermosa Avenue to 800' west of Haven 45 25. Hillside Road - from Ranch Gate to Amethyst Street 35 26. Lemon Avenue - Archibald Avei.ue to Haven Avenue 40 a 8a. aW CM Ordinance January 20, 1988 Page 4 ,y 27. Lemon Avenue - Jasper St. to Beryl St. 35 =, 28. San Bernardino Road - from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 35 i 19. Sapphire Street - Banyan to end 45 30. Sapphire Street - 19th to Lemon 40 31. Spruce Avenue - Elm Avenue to Base Line Rd. 40 32. Terra Vista Parkway - Church to Belpine 40 33. Turner Avenue - Eighth to Foothill 45 c 34. Turner Avenue (Hermosa Ave.) - Foothill to Base Line Road 45 35. Victoria Avenue - from Etlwanda Avenue ` to Route 15 40 ;. 36. Victoria Park Lane 35 ' 3' Victoria Windrows 0op (north d south) 35 38. Vineyard Avenue - Church to Base Line Rd. 40 ' 39. Vineyard Avenue - from 8th Street to Foothill Blvd. 45 40. Whlttram Avenue - Etiwanda to east City Limits 40 (Ord. 169 Section 1 (part), 1982: Ord. 39 Section 5.1, 1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty -five (65) miles per hour and fifty -five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are mars than are reasonable or safe; (41) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most approppriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; (111) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on sail streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer 1s hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit leclared herein. X83 CITY Or. RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 91 Slid' TO: Mayor and Members of City Council, and City Manager to a'ROMt Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJFCTt r"TST CONTROL PROBLEMS - HORTHVIEW DRIVE IN TERRA VISTA Ck 141UNITY BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: At the City Council meeting of January 8, the City Council requested a report from staff regarding dust control problems along Northvlew Drive In the Terra Vista planned development, as related to two recent dust storms —one In mid- December, the other on the day before Christmas. A summary of our Investigation of the alto and research of Owl flies follows: The properties In question are eleven (11) contiguous lots thct were 'left over" from development of two subdivisions. The lots are located nortaerly of Baseline, east of Haven and immediately south of the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of -way. (See exhiblt.) City records I:.Jicate that during the Initial construction of the developments, the lots were utilized as a temporary retention basin to provide run -off protection for down- stream properties. The basin was constructed as part of the original grading permit for the tracts and under a dust control permit from the County which covered a number of subdivisions. When a storm drain was Installed and the basin was no longer necessary, Lewis Homes removed the basin embankment and regraded the lots, apparently under the assumption that because It was part of the original graded area, no supplementary permit was necessary. This was apparently correct Insofar as the County permit was concerned, but was not true In regard to the original City grading permit which had expired. When Lewis }tomes was notified of that circumstance, a supplementary permit was obtained. The combined lots, having been developed In accordance with all prior approvals, were considered as ready for construction, but still subject to dust control measures required by the county permit. After the first December storm, Building and Safety Division was contacted by one of the homeowners affected and subsequently contacted Lewis Homes, advising them of the occurrence and reminding them of their responsibilities under their permit and of the need for taking precautionary measures. Lewis Homes reportedlf reached conclusions as to means of resolving the problems, and prepared correspondence to the affected parties In that regard. However, we aro Informed that there was a decay In mailing of the correspondence and the second storm hit before the Information reached the property owners. 2?q r�l City Council Meeting DUST CONTROL PROBLEMS January 20, 1888 Page 2 The Bundling and Safety Division has since met with Mr. Allan Smith representing tiv- Agrlcultural Commissioners Office, the agency primarily responsible for enforcement of dust control policies within the City. We have requested them to stringently monitor the exposed area in the vlclydty of the problem. They Indicated thev would Investigate and contact those Involved. Building and Safety Division subsequently met with several of the affected property owners to more thoroughly understand their concerns. We also contacted Lewis Homes representatives urging their resolution of the problems. In response, they acknowledged their failure to fulfill their responsibilities under the County permit- They have since met with the homeowners and, at last report, see taking steps to resolve the Incurred damages to the satisfaction of the owners In the meantime the Division has ordered Lewis Homes to Install an operative water - sprinkler system at the site as an additional precaution. The system Is now operational. Also, Lewis Homes has begun construction of a masonry wall along the railroad right-of- way which provides additional protection from dust and sand. North of the Terra Vista properties and the rallrosd, there are two additional vacant properties that have recently been graded by Grupe Development- One is to be utilized for continuation of a project currently underway north of Victoria Avenue, the other as a temporary drainageway for the northerly construction and for Installation of a storm drain under an Assessment District. Because of Its northeasterly orientation from the Terra Vista properties and windrowed soft in evidence along the railroad r[ghbof -way, we have asked the county io pursue compliance from Grupe Development to assure that their responsibilities under their dust control permit are achieved. Additionally, Building cad Safety has reiterated to Grupe their responsibilities under the County permit and of the concerns of the affected property owners Finally, the Dlv!sion has notified Grupe to restore the area where the storm drain has been Installed and provide dust mitigation measures on that property. Respectfully yssubmitted, Building Official JRGlkep Q195 M Z w Z el BASELINE ROAD as(i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 20, 1988 01 To: Mnyor, Members of City Council, and City Manager From: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Hanauer By: Kathy Sorensen, Senior Recreation Supervicor Subject: Night Lighted sports Fields and Facilities in Red Hill Community Park. It is current practice of Community services staff to provide lighted facilities from dusk through lo:00p.m. at all city lighted fields and facilities including Rea Hill Community Park. These lights are obtained by written request on a Facilities Reservat on form. City staff turns the lights on and off at the requested times and dates except at Beryl Park. AYSO has exclusive use of Beryl and has keys to turn on and off those lights. If the light request goes until lo, on a a ., then the lights era turned off by an automatic timer. If the request is for prior to 10:OOp.m.I then they are turned off manually at the prescribed time. Below is a light survey of surrounding cities and how they handle sports field lighting: LIGHT POLICIES OF SURROUNDING CITIES January 1988 CITY IiQ1i�g1:FD ON 'rrum tT Lights out _ Ontario Staff Permit 11:00P.m. Digital Tiner for long use periods like the same hour requests over a extended period of time (i.e. AYSO) Fontana Issues Key to group At groups Discression ($10 deposit) 10:00p.m. Upland Staff By permit 30 :30p.m. Chino Staff By permit 11:00p.m. LaVerno Staff By permit 10:00p.m. Pomona Staff By permit 20toop.m. n :r January 20, 1988 Page 2 CITY HA TURNED 01 r.r .HT H LIGHTS CHEDULE p(Ij_ Corona Staff By permit 10:30p.m. Riverside Staff San Bernardino Staff 6 Rey check out Rancho Cucalonga Staff Beryl only AYSO By permit 10:OOp.m. By permit and by groups Discression as long as no other group uses that field during tho season. 10:00p.m. By permit 10:O0p.1. Com:unity Services staff and the Park Maintenance staff have received some concerns regarding the lights. They fall into these areas: late use of lights, lights on and no one's there, brightness, miss directed lights, not enough lighted fields, effi.cient turn on of lights, weekend use of lights. Below is a sho:.-t description of these concerns. Use of lights until io:oop.m. was approved by action of the City Council on January 7, 1987. Recently the city installed automatic, digital timers on all these clocks which turns off the lights at 10:0op.m. sharp. - Lights are on and no onus there. Sometimes groups are late or just do not show up. However, they have requested us to have the facility available. During rainy weather the lights may or may not be on. Community Services staff is currently working cooperatively with Maintenance staff to develop a Rain -Out Policy which we have boon testing successfully for the past two munths. - Park Planning is in the process of obtaining shields and working with the lighting contractor to better direct the light onto the fields versus the surrounding area. However, when lights are being used to create a daylight environment, lights will be seen for a distance regardless of shields. - During the recent wind storms several of the lights were blown out of alignment. Park Planning ie currently working with the lighting contractor on realignment of the-:o lights. - Uommunity Services staff has turned dove: several rs ^.o ettx for weekend light use. These have b,a•n evenly rpilt between youth and adult organizatio!,c. A "su light" we,:kend practice , is in uae at thin time. 'it, Pik and Recreation commission will he addressing this issue r`. their January 21, 1988 meeting. If you desire any additional information regardi:,g this matter, please contact me. Thank you. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20. 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager MOM: Russell H. Maguire. City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: City Wide Tree Maintenance BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS This report is presented as an overview of the City trey 13intenance Programs and policies relating to basic grounds ano landscape maintenance apart from developer or capital project. As we examine City tree programs, It is importait to note that fiscal year 1987 -88 marks a significant transition period with regard to management of the City's tree inventory. In past years, our tree maintenance programs concentrated largely on preserving our historical Windrow Eucalyptus and basic safety related maintenance of street and park trees. With the second half of fiscal yeas 1987 -88, we begin the first phase of a multi -year implementation or a comprehensiUe tree management program. The implementation of our expanded tree program mans that some of our Past policies and procedures will be changed ano improved. Therefore, we will attempt to contrast the old programs and policies with the changes to be 1mp,emented this year. In addition, we will discuss the proposed implementation phasing of the prograo throuSh fiscal year 1990 -91. Within the parameters of grounds and landscape maintenance, there are six basic categories into which City trees may be grouped. These six groups are: parks, parkways, medians, facility, grounds, trails and paseos, and special areas. maintenance within our rparks uis funded by the general fund opr a landscape maintenance assessment district. Maintenance within all City park, is performed by City crews. The annual maintenance work program provides for basic tree maintenance and tree replacenent within the City parks. Relative t� the other groups, our parks tree inventcry is, in general, a small percentage and most of the trees are quite young. CCSR CITY WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE JANUARY 20, 1988 PAGE 2 In contrast, by far the largest number of City trees is within the Parkways. All City parkway trees are broken down into four subgroups and the type and frequency of routine tree maintenance and /or replacement has differed depending uponi the specific subgroup. These subgroups are classified as follows: landscape maintenance assessment aistrict parkways, special parkways (i.e. Carnelian Avenue from Vineyard Avenue to Banyan Street), general City parkways /residential, and general City parkways /commercial - industrial. There are six landscape maintenance assessment districts within the City. District i1 - General City District /2 - Victoria Windrows Planned Community District /3 - Comm ercial - Industrial District 04 - Terra Vista Planned Community District /5 - Tot Lot (26th Street and Turner Avenue) District i6 - Caryn Planned Community When the City Council accepts for maintenance an improved parkway within one of these district, routine maintenance is taken over by one of the City's landscape maintenance contractors. All parkway trees within those parkways are then scheduled for routine maintenance including replacement if destroyed or seriously damaged. Special parkways are also maintained by one of the City's landscape maintenance contractors. Routine tree maintenance and tree replacement are also scheduled and performed under the scope of services provided by the contractor. General City parkways within from landscape maintenance as have attached a copy of the I 17. 1987, which described the the City trees within resid maintenance of Eucalyptur Wi serviced when a maintenance dead or diseased. This is us made by a citizen and almost tree maintenance contractor. lential areas are handled differently mt district and special parkways. We !ring Division Uudget Memo dated April mode of operation for maintenance of general City parkways. Except for residential parkway trees had been ,isor determines theta were dangerous, in response to a service order request s requires removal of the tree by our CCSR CITY WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE JANUARY 20, 1988 PAGE 3 Replacement of general City parkway trees within residential areas had been carried out on a limited scale. In these residential areas, the Maintenance Section offered to provide a resident with a replacement uree if their parkway tree was lost due to storm or necessary removal. The Maintenance Section would deliver a new fifteen gallon tree, tree stakes, tree ties, planting instructions and technical Advice if the resident was wili1ng to plant the new tree within the parkway. The exception would be if a City maintenance project or capital project required removal of a tree, then the tree wou% be replaced within the scope of work for the project. The fourth suo- category is general City parkways within commercial and Industrial areas. In the past, installation, maintenance and replacement of parkway trees in these areas had been totally the responsibility of the abutting property owner within the scope of the conditions of approval for each specific project. Leaving this last sub - category of parkway trees, the third general group is trees within median islands. Currently, depending upon location, all maintenance of landscaped median islands is funded by the general fund or a landscape maintenance assessment district. Routine tree maintenance and /or replacement is handled by one of the City's landscape maintenance contractors. Facility grounds, Group four, i.e. the Lion Center and Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, are maintained by City crews. Routine tree maintenance and /or replacement are scheduled within the work program. Group five, trails and paseos, fails within landscape maintenance assessment districts with a few exceptions. Routine tree maintenance and /or replacement on trails and paseos within these districts is handled by one of the City's landscape maintenance contractors. Those trails and paseos that are not in assessment districts are maintained by the City Maintenance Crews and tree maintenance and replacement is part of the work program. The last of the six basic categories is "special areas". This category includes components such as flood control areas and Eucalyptus windows. Tree maintenance in certain flood control areas is currently performed by one of the City's landscape maintenance contractors under a cooperative agreement with San Bernardino County. The administrative and direct costs for these maintenance functions are reimbursed by the County. CCSR CITY WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE JANUARY 20, 1988 PAGE 4 In regard to the Eucalyptus window areas, these are on a five -year tree maintenance program cycle. This cycle provides for a specific schedule of trimming and /or removal as necessary. The fwiding for this maintenance function is from the general fund and the services are provided by our tree maintenance contractor. As we review our policies and procedures regarding our management of Rancho Cucamonga's urban forest, this seems an appropriate place to review some of the more innovative aspects of what we do. Because of the nature of dealing with specimen trees, we generally do not budget any special line items to import large trees into our streets or parks inventory. However, we have been quite successful last year and this year, as well, in identifying select trees within the limits of capital projects, which normally would be sold or destroyed, and saving and locating them. Last year for example, approximately forty -six large Poplar trees were saved from the Victoria Park Lane Improvement Project and transplanted into Church Street Park. This year, to date, over forty Jacaranda trees were transplanted from the median island in Haven Avenue to Heritage Park as part of the Haven Median Project. In addition, seven large (30' average height) palm trees were transplanted from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Park as part of the Ramona Avenue Improvement Project. Also, as other specimen trees become available through projects, we will continue to enhance our City parks and streets wherever possible. With past history and policy behind us, the following is a breakdown of tree loss damage suffered during the windstorms of December 1987. Our analysis includes estimates of cost to replace lost trees, remaining sources of funding, fund balances and estimates of completion. 1. Victoria Planned Community, Victoria Groves Park and Windrows Park, all within Landscape Maintenance Assessment District /2, lost a total of one hundred and ninety -four (194) trees. The total landscape maintenance budget for contract services within District 02 is $108,850. Of this, $16,327 1s budgeted for routine tree maintenance and /or replacement. The remaining contract services balance as of November 30, 1987, was $65,752. Our current estimate to replace lost trees within District i2 is $12,300. The Maintenance Section is currently receiving bid proposals fmr replacement trees to be j 'Ad by CCSR CITY WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE JANUARY 20, 1988 PAGE 5 one of our landscape maintenance cnntractors. We estimate that replanting within these areas should be complete within six to eight weeks. However, it should be noted that current monthly expenditures for routine landscape maintenance contract services 1s exceeding $8,000. By protecting this average through June 30, 1988, and combining the cost of tree replacements, we could quite possibly end up with a deficit in this district of nearly $7,000 by the end of the fiscal year, and we will be working closely with Revenue Assessment regarding funding and in monitoring of this district. 2. Terra Vista Planned Community, Coyote Canyon Par. and Spruce Park, all within Landscape Maintenance Assessment District f4, were the hardest hit and lost a total of two hundred ninety -seven (297) trees. The total Landscape Maintenance Budget for contract services within District 44 is $35,986.00. Of this, $5,400.00 was budgeted for tree maintenance and /or replacement. Our current estimate to replace the lost trees in District E4 is $19,000.00. We are working with Revenue Assessment to find ways to fund the $13,600.01) deficit. If funding is not available this year, we will be replanting what can be funded this fiscal year which would be approximately eighty -five (85) trees. The balance of tta tree replacements would then be installed in fiscal year 1988 -89. 3. City parkways and median islands within general City wide Landscape Maintenance District /1, lost sixty seven (67) trees. The total Landscape Maintenance S,idget for contract services within District /1 is $31,000.00, of this, 54,600.00 is budgeted for routine tree maintenance and /or replacerent. Our current estimate to replace the trees lost within District /4 is 54,200.00. The Maintenance Section is currently receiving bid proposals for replacement trees which will be replanted by one of our landscape maintenance contractors. We estimate that these replantings can be completed within eight to ten weeks. 4. General Fund City parks and parkways, Red Hill and Heritage Parks and the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center lost a total of one hundred eighty -four (184) trees. The Maintenance Section's annual work program budget for routine tree maintenance and /or replacement is $20.000.00. The Balance remaining as of November 30th was $18,000.00. Our current estimate to replace these lost trees is $11.700. The Maintenance Section is currently receiving bid proposals for replacement trees which will be planted by a combination of contract servlces and City crews within an estimated eight to ten weeks. CCSR CITY WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE JANUARY 20, 1988 PAGE 6 S. The final general areas sustaining tree losses were the Landscaped County Flood Control Areas. A total of nineteen (19) trees were lost in these areas. The Estimate for replacement of trees within these areas 1s $1,200.00. These trees will be replaced by one of our landscape maintenance contractors within an estimated eight to ten weeks. All costs incurred in performing this work will be reimbursed to the City through the cooperative agreement with San Bernardino County. The following is a chart welch details the loss and replacement statistics discussed above. District No.1 District No. 2 District No. 4 City Wid- County General City. Victoria Terra Vista General Fund Flood Control No. of Trees lost 67 191 297 181 19 Caitract Services Budget S 31,000 S'mam $35,996 WA WA Nov. 30 Balm $24,721 $ 65,752 $26,413 s18,000 WA Tree Paint. Budget 4,600 $16,327 $ 5,400 $ 20.000 N/A Estimate Tree Repla»�t azt 4,200 S 12,300 $19.000 S 11,700 $ 1,200 Projected Contrart Services tlav hue 30 $ 15,000 $103,400 123,000 WA WA Surplus cr Defteit + 11,810 -7,030 -6,000 + 6,300 i Estimate replanting cmpletlon 3.2246 3.1-88 3.14)3 3-Va 3.22 -M Total No. of Trees lost 761 Total Estimate Reply m 3tt Cost 548,400 CCSR CITY WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE JANUARY 20, 1988 PAGE 7 Also please note that the Engineering Division is currently Completing Its mid -year review of all its operations and capital budgets. It is part of that review that all budget items be considered, and we will be addressing the possible deficit Problems in Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 2 b 4 as well as general needs and contingencies for the balance of this fiscal year for all the items discussed previously. Finally and in closing with the storm debris cleared up and replanting procedures underway, the Maintenance Section is beginning implementation of the budgeted improvements to our tree management programs. This fiscal year, the initial three man crew and equipment will begin to Perform safety related quick response tree maintenance. This function is historically the most costly to contrast out, due to high hourly rates chzryed by contractors for emergency call out. Also, our in -house response time will be much shorter than contract services and will therefore help limit the City's exposure in hazard situations. In addition, this crew will ba tsking over response to all tree related service order requested. Our Goal is to respond more quickly to Citizen requests for tree service as we implement a more pro - active tree maintenance program. The Maintenance Section currently receives eight to ten tree related service order aquests per day. We also plan to take over maintenance of all City parkway trees including commercial and industrial areas and to begin servicing the backlog of service order requests. However, obviously three men cannot begin to effectively manage a City wide tree 1nve,itory estimated at fifty thousand (50,000) trees. As this crew begins the basic program , we will also implement a pilot program to inventory approximately one third of the City's trees. A comprehensive City wide tree inventory and computerized tree management program is essential if we are to manage our urban forest effectively. We have budgeted enough to begin the pror.ess this year. However, if our mid -year budget reviews show funds availeale, we will attempt to complete the City wide inventory this fiscal yesr and thereby gaining a head start on Fiscal Year 1988 -89. Hopefully, Fiscal Year 1988 -89 will see the implementation of a computerized city wide tree management program. Our other mayor goals will be to add supplemental men and equipment and contract services to continue to expand our services to meet demand and to begin replanting of the backlog of lost City trees through the City. a� CM CITY WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE JANUARY 20, 1988 PACE 8 Fiscal Year 1989 -90 should finalize our overall program growth to fill out needed men and equipment and contract services. This wilt provide the needed resources to conduct full City wide maintenance of our City tree inventory. In addition, we hope to complete the replanting of the backlog of lost City trees and begin reforesting of the City by planting trees in parkways which never had trees before. As Fiscal Year 1990 -91 rolls around, we expect to be in full swing with our on -going City tree programs. tes c y tted, n