Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/03/02 - Agenda Packet.�^ � ' CITY COUNCIL 7* CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS I st and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:30 p.m. Kcrch 2, 1988 Lions Park Crimmunity Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga Dennis L Stout, uayw Pamela J. Wright. maj.,f*-Tm Deborah N. Brown, cvwuw,.f� Charles J. Buquet, ct&.,xbt, Lauren M. Wasserman. ciqmew� Beverly A. Authelet, ctiycwt � ' PAGE" City Council Agenda March 2. 19RA i � All items submitted for, the City Council Agenda most be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. (lead by Girl Scouts) 2. Roll Call: Brown _, BuSuet , Stout King and WrigFt_=_ B. ANNOUNCENERTS /PRESENTATICNS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation proclaiming March 6 - 12 as Girl Scout Week. 2. Presentation of a 10 -Year Service Award to Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager. C. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register No',,. 2/17/68 and 2/24/88 1 and Payroll ending 2/18/88 for the total amount of $844,699.94. 2• Approval to receive and file current Investment 11 Schedule as of February 25, 1988. 3. Approval to solicit appraisals for the future North East 19 Community Park site, a General Plan designation located in the Etiwanda area. 4 Approval to deny the appeal of the Planning Commission's 20 decision for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 13579, Richard Ayoub, and confirm the City Council action of a public hearing held February 17, 1988. i � MEN �// 2 1 /11w/!M/ 1 PAGE - City Council Agenda r......�, a 1606 - 3 I RESOLUTION NO. 88 -097 - 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENTING WITHOUT PREJUDICE TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13579,-, AN APPLICATION TO APPROVE: A MULTI - FAMILY ' RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISED OF NINE UNITS ON .69 ACRES OF LAND IN `THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED OH THE EAST ; SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, 325 FEET OF ,NORTH NINETEENTH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF S. Approval of a proposal to designate the Schoaalter 24 House, located 'at 5495 Hermosa Avenue (northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Hillside Road), as Historic Landmark Designation No. 27 - AFN 201- 101 -04. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -098 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 27 TO DESIGNATE "THE SCHOWALTER HOdSE- LOCATED AT 5495 HERMOSA AVENUE 6. Approval to declare as surplus equipment and authorize 41 sale of vehicles through public auction a 1981 Jeep Cherokee and a 1979 Chevrolet 3/4 ton truck. 7 Approval to accept the Turner Avenue Street 42 Improvements and Area VII Storm Drain Phase I Improvement Project as complete, release bonds, authorize the City Engineer to file a •Notice of Completion", and approve the final contract amount of ' $955,406.44. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $885,165.90 Retention $ 95,593.84 Labor 6 Materials Bond $442,582.95 Accept; 10% Maintenance Bond $ 95,600.00 9 d.' PAGE City Council Agenda March 2 1988 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -099 43 `• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.- CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TURNER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND AREA VII STORM DRAIN, PHASE I AND AUTHORIZING THE :FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK B. Approval to award'the,Arrow Route Reconstruction Phase 44 I Improvement Project located between Turner Avenue and Archibald Avenue to Fontana Paving, Incorporated for the amount of $243,900 to be fundcd from the Systems fund, account number 22- 4637 -8735. 9. Approval to •authorize the advertising of a "Notice 48 Inviting Bids" for the S;urry Seal Program Phase I Fiscal Year 1987 -88 Improvement Project, located In -- - areas 1 thru 9 to be funded from SO 300 Funds, account number 15- 4637 -8050. RESOLUTION NO. 88400 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM, PHASE I, F.Y.,1987 -880, IN SAID CITY- AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 10. Approval to awal' and execute the Professional Services 63 Agreement (CO 88 -026) for the Contract Inspection Services for the Arrow Route Reconstruction Phase I Project to NBS /Lowry, Incorporated, for the amount of $13,700 to be funded from the S� tems Fund, account - number 22- 4637 -8735. 11. Approval to award and execute Professional Services 64 Agreement (CO 88 -027) with J. William Murphy and Associates Consulting Appraisers for an amount not to exceed $25,000.00 to be paid from various project funds for appraisal services. 12 Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 4 (CO 81- 65 20) with Don Greek and Associates to perform additional design reports for Altd Loma Basins, west of Haven Avenue, north of Highland Avenue; to expand their contract by $2,503.00 to bring contract total tc $19,752.00 , :' t `f•+: r' :. +'�'�,�C:r'f�r r,'l,i,,.'�:arsti`- ?C •vc r, .� ..$._ _K, &..t:.:•: >,��"/�,w'E��; -.�'ti ,sue`. La:N�y °y. J 4 City Caunctl Agenda #11 Mirch'2. 1988 4 S� , t 13. Approval of an$amendmont (CO 88 -02) to an Improvement-' 67 Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and; Erma'` - I Dennis for the Base Line Road Widening Project from * Archibald' Avenue to Hellman Avenue, to clarify <future street improvement.requirements for Base Line Road., 14. Approval of the Environmental Assessment Initial Study 78 w and Issuance of•a Negative Declaration for the proposed Base Line' Road Phase I Rehabilitation, Widening, and Storm Drain Improvements from I -15 to Etiwanda Avenue. , ' RESOLUTION NO. 88 -101 91 h A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND Il ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE - PROPOSED BASE LINE ROAD PHASE I d. REHABILITATION, WIDENING, AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM I -15 TO ETIWAROA AVENUE i'- 15. Approval to release cash deposits for: 92 Tract 12914 /Ba rossa Place - to Pannon Design a Development; Inc. Model Home Sates Office $2,500 Monument Sign Permit $ 500 +� Tract 12238 - Citation Builders. 1' Model Home Sales Office $2,500 Tract 12830 - Citation Builders. Subdivision Identification Sign f 628 16. Approval to Quitclaim Lot B, Tract No. 12942, located 93 within the Caryn Planned Coanaunity, to Kaufman and Broad Land Company. RESOLUTION NO. 88302 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAINCHD CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAX BERNARDINO. SiATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE QUIiCLAINED LOT B. TRACT N0. 12942 I- * ... ' ' jf r PAGd � City Council Agenda �� c, ♦aeo.. . p 17. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds, and 98 filing Notices of Completion for: , OR BE-07 - loceted on the northeast corner of 6th Street Gan I�ven Avenue, Faithful Performa.w;e Bond $60,000 (Utility Und ^rgrounding) RESOLUTION NO. eR403 99 A RESOLUTION OF•THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC, IMPROVEMENTS FOR- DR 86 -07 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 18. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement ' Security for for OR 87 -31, located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Turner /Luca: Rancho Road Partners. RESOLUTION N0. 88404 I 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF TH, CIT1 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT `BREEIEN'. DAD IMPP.OVE14ERT SECUTITY FOP OEVELOPM:Ri REVIEW NO. 8; -3: la. Approvtt of Improveme.it Agreem:•,t ano Improvement 103 Security for Elm Avenue from Ourr: Street northeasterly to Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes of California as part of the Terra Vista Planned Coom pity. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -1U5 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY LF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMEMT AGRCEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ELM AVENUE 20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 84- 106 17, located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwa -ida Avenue, submitted by Patscheck - Hackbarth. i I i .i x• P: PAGE City Council Agenda March 2, 1988; RESOLUTION NO. 88406 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 84 -12 21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for'Tract 10035, located on the southeast corner of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Calle Corazon, submitted by Rancho Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 88407 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10035 22. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9192 located in The Caryn Panned Community, submitted by Marlborough Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 88408 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9192, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9192), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 23. Approval of Nap, Improvcment Agreement, and Improvement Security for Tracts 13557. 13559, and 13562 located on the Mnst side of Rochester Avenue, north and south of Vintage Drive, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad. RESOLUTION NO. 88409 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL NAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13557, 13559, AND 13562 107 108 109 110 111 113 115 e. i ,'T' Ff :�w9 A` �r11•;J;�,+�1 �'�iY .'ir.. r�ry _ . -.. -. ... -r�x �r t•.�',T":"'t+� •,`• <�.�i�r4:+':�- 5 Y. r ,- �,{ /� City Council' Agenda �s• c Y. -•:A 7 1fWe •C l f ��a• } 5 1 6 24. Approval to execute; contract (CO 88 -028) for the 117 Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing Pro,lect, located north of :e - Line Road previously awarded to Riverside Construction Company, Incorporated ifor the amount of,$112,456 to be •4 funded from, Federal Section 203,Fund, account number 17- 4637- 8717,tand the Systems Fund; account number 22 -4637- 8750. - 25. Set public•hearing•for April 6, 1988 - Approval -to Annex 118 Or 87 -31, located'north of 4th Street and west of Lucas Ranch Road to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 16. , RESOLUTION NO. 88-110 '119 A RESOLUTION OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF THE' CITY ' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 16 TO LANDSCAPE MAIKrENAYCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88-111 125 A RESOLUTION OF RHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TC ORDER 711E ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE NAINTEKANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNCXATION NO. 16 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 26. Set public hearing for April 6, 1988 - Approval to Annex 127 Tract Nos. 1557, 13562, and 13559 (Caryn) to landscape Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 88412 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION HO, 2 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 4;• ,y •C l f ��a• } 5 1 6 II nw F1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . W�p Y'? pty,Council Agenda, March 2..' 1988 135' RESOLUTION NO. 88413, ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS lyS INTENTION TO ORDER-THE- ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.16, AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT- , DESIGNATING :SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 2 70 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MO. PURSUANT TO TAE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR,HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 137 27. Set public bearing joO April 6. 1988 - APPr0v8I to Pimex DR 87-31, Tr3ct 13557, 13562 and 13559 to Street Lighting Maintenance District NO. I as Annexation He. 39. 138 RESOLUTION ND. $8414 A RESOLUTION OF THL CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY A?PR04AL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION No. 39 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 147 RESOLUTION NO. 88415 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL U* THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA- CALIFORNIA. DE0.ARIV.G ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE AmHE%ATtOH TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO- 1, An ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGHATIhG SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 39 TO STREET LIGHTING WaNTENAHCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT To THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AHD OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS yHERET0 ex 149 98. Set public hearing for Apri14 6. 19BB - Approval to Ann 98. OR 87-31, located north of th Street and west of Lucas Ranch Road, to Street Lighting Maintenance District Me- 6 as Anqexation No. 12. n !t . r. t . r City Council Agenda'. - March 2. 198n o a 0 RESOLUTION NO. 88-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT ' FOR ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO STRCET.LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 88.117 156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER: THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 ' AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 29. Set public hearing for April 6)) 1988 - Approval to Annex 158 Tract 13557, 13562, and 13559 `Caryn) to Street LightinC Maintenance District No. 5 as Annexation No. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -118 159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 88-119 167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCID CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S. AN ASSESSMENT D: >TPICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME KID PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 0 +t 1 PAGE „t • City Council Agenda - r- March 2. 1988 30 _ai r. _„2. +" 30. Set public hearing for April 6, 1938 - Approval to amend 169 ` ! Map Tract No. 10827 -2 lecdted south of Wilson Avenue ° between Haven and Hermosa „venuas, submitted by U.S. Homes, Incorporated. I r'AESOLUTIOY NO. 88420, 170 i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORM IA.' DECLARING ITS ' INTENTION TO APPR3VE AMENDING NAP, TRACT ' 10B27 -2 AND .OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO r D. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be ' ~ routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Counc" _- one tine without discussion. The City Clerk will .ead the title. Any item can be removed for - +scussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPEED LIMIT- , ecommen at on to es tab 1sn a MP an a 0 M H speed limit on Hermosa Avenue betweer, Base Line Road and Sun Valley Drive; a 40 MPH speed limit on Ninth Street between Baker Avenue and Archibald Avenue; and a 50 MPH speed limit on Rochester Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. OPDIRANCE NO. 340 (second reading) 172 All ORDINPACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 3F RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANC!IO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN STREETS 2, LOd5I0ERATION OF AWN ODIFICATION TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 70 - amendment to crease cr mina penalties and adding civil .remedies. ILI F r. _„2. +" PAGE' City Council Agenda % r Marrh'7. 1AAA 11 ORDIfUNCE NO. 70•F (second reading) 175 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.24.210 OF, AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 2.24.220 TO, CHAPTER 2.24 OF THE RANCHO CHCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, THEREBY INCREASING CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND ADD *.NG CIVIL REMEDIES E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following pees have been advertised anufor posted as public hearings as required by law. The chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TEIITATI VE TRACT ^ " 177 13727 CI IC SOUTHWEST C N R NC 0 VAN - ELI 0 L URL11 1-Appeal o the Plnn ning amisslon s eC s on requ ring payment of an in -lieu fee for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Carnelian Street for t proposed residential subdivision located at the southwest corner of Carnelian Street and Highland avenue - APN 201 -214- 11. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN 190 ENJ OMENT 8 -01 - CITY OF R iCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposa to amend tne Victoria Lommun ty Plan text to require a Conditional Use Permit for shopping centers and certain commercial uses. ORDINANCE NO. 341 (first reading) 200 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COM191NITY AMENDMENT 88.1 TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO ntQUIRE A CONDiilONAL USE PERMIT FOR SHOPPING CENTERS AND CERTAIN USES IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARDS SECTION OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAIT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN NEE iJM N 88 -0 1 ' CITY OF RANCHO UL ONG - proposa to amend a TerrI Vista Co=unity Pan text to require a Conditional Use Permit fo.• shopping centers and certain commercial uses. PAGE A City Council Agenda - larch 2, 1488 12 R _ •Y i ,M ORDINANCE NO. 342 (first reading) 206 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT' FOR SHOPPING CENTERS ' AND CERTAIN USES IN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL STAHDAQOS SECTION OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN 3. ENVIRONMENTAL- ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN IF" ST 88- 216 - CITY 0 RANCHO CHO CU ON - A request o amen the rca at on Element of c nerdI Plan for,the Purposes of accomplishing the realignment of Hillside Road to replace the double intersection or Hillside Road-'and Amethyst Avenue with a single intersection at Amethyst Avenue and a reverse curve to future Klusaan Avenue. - RESOLUTION NO. 88 -121 227 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. SE - -01B AMENDING THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN 4. CONSIDERATION OF AKENOING NAP FOR TRACT N0. 13058 - 'L31 UL HOM C R R 10 MICHIGAN CORFU ION - A request to amend t e map or Tract 1305B located SCUth of Highland Avenue, between Fairmont Way and the Deer Creek Channel. RESOLUTION 140. 88-122 232 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING !WENDING HAP OF TRACT NO. 13059 5 ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: A ANNEXATION NO. 10 FOR PARCEL HAP NO. 11236 LOCATED 234 ETWEEN LIWB L TR if AND SPRUCE AVENtig, NO— RTH 07 RED DaK. 10 '< LIGHTING MAINItNPOICE D R CT Nom- i ,M I PAGE City Council Agenda • !I4YCh 2, 1988 13 .0 .f RESOLUTION NO. 88 423 235 A RESOLUTION OF NE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 112 =6 B. ANNEXATION NO. 25 FOR TRACT NO. 13275 LOCATED 1200' 241 EA T�Eri VENU NORTN ID 0 IIH4AFD V . UE 0 TREE LI N thG X NT ANC. DfSTR�CT NO. RESOLUTION 110. 88-124 242 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA:TFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 25 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13275 C. ANNEXATION NO 42 FOR TRACT NO. 13275 LOCATED 248 OF D HA EN NOR DE 01 TL VD Et1UE TO LAND L PE MRINTENRNCE O1 TRICT HO. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 88 425 249 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4DNGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION '4ITH ANNEXATION N0. 42 TO LAND!-CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ' ACCEPTING THE FI',AL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT hO 13275 D. ANNEXATION NO. 14 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 11236 LOCATED 254 BETWEEN LAUREL STREET AND PRUCE ENUE NOR -TH OF ED OAK STREET, T3 LANDSCAPE M N D STR C 0. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -126 255 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCID CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH INNEXATION NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL FAGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 11236 .0 .f 't^ City Council Agenda March 2. 1 98 8 14 E. ANNEXATION N0. 37 FOR TRACT N0. 13215 AND PARCEL 261 M N0. 23 V R OU LO TIONS THROUGHOUT H Cam) TO STREET LIGH ING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 88-127 262 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 110. 37 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL CNGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13275 AND PARCEL NAP NO. 11236 F. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication nr posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION Cc STAFF'S OEhIAL OF APPLICATION FOR 269 PERMIT YO�GN�{ UL OR Y ON N D 0 ILL'a IDE A N NUT OF MURNING CANYON WAY BLAKEL Y RESIUENCE 514 MORNING CANYON WAY. (Continued from February 11 , 2 DISCUSSION OF TELEPHONE SITUATION IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 273 Continued from February , 988 Buquet 3. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING A SCHEDUL!NG POLICY FOR 274 NIGHT LIGHTIO CITY P KS. Ii. COUNCIL BUSINESS ' The fallowing items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They art not public hearing Items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. E `L I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to- identify the items they wish to discuss at the next-meeting. These Items "rill not be discussed at_ this meeting, only identified, for the next meeting. , J. COMMUrICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC " This is the time and place for the general public to address -� the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from ' addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Conncil my receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five mtnutes per individual. K. ADJOURNMENT Meeting to adjourn to March 12, 1988, Clarion Hotel, 8:30 a.m. - 5 :00 p.m., for Goals Workshop. I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 26, 1988, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Line Road. i C Ri 4 P �rt Pl �Y 7jj(W' . xi,. "tic[.' w. �: �.. _ r.• "'�`` PAL r � a `_ 'rye r�r � - city Council Agenda Y + - . March 2, 1988 .''15 _ 1. DISCUSSION OF SCHEOULE.FOR FINALIZATION AND ACCEPTANCE 277 F NEW STREET CONSTRUCTIONS. Ouquet - ' 2. CONSIDERATION OF REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB I ,,282 I, I HIVE. Buquet I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to- identify the items they wish to discuss at the next-meeting. These Items "rill not be discussed at_ this meeting, only identified, for the next meeting. , J. COMMUrICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC " This is the time and place for the general public to address -� the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from ' addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Conncil my receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five mtnutes per individual. K. ADJOURNMENT Meeting to adjourn to March 12, 1988, Clarion Hotel, 8:30 a.m. - 5 :00 p.m., for Goals Workshop. I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 26, 1988, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Line Road. i C Ri 4 P �rt Pl �Y f�Y _�A,'SY°F i'+c�?xha�rt•,:: - --_.:� i'i:r.y2 ivy • .. _ ,_ ., .. - ,r ti+ }i �r T 4S ; e000 o o oo 0 oNOO.•n000N 00 0 0 =0803089 o Par +mN000n nmF ^an °a nnnY•,i(nryoou 1 V 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 .ON '• a•NiN �j a i 1 p F•On + °L �+'"mra.n nn °wP..°.nii$FN.•.ry nN�e <i -o N =29 y,i.., °= Q i .N. �.1: w �ry..N. w � �."'.� - "••.`..`. ". `. gym. N.N N.3 a.m. °..m. N..N..N. � �.N. N. °N.'f..•'.r 2 NNNNNNNNNM1NryNNNnNNNNryNryNryNNNNNNryryNNNNryryN Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 z i J W N .. Sn •••• '•.F. 1 ryQN i� QQ u¢iQ <u¢i j Q x Fi xi iz uFO 1= L Q o Y � i=oQ Q YY pYW Nu u¢NN 1 •` W M1_< •• Y N w L ¢ N S pagO- w W 00 161r 1 \ \ \ umiw WNJWN Q' r n N 1„N .NA N M i YYY 8 FSNi. u0���02 N 1 O O W V p O O Y SF w Yp OS6GF6- ZI S V N °= Y W Y� NVNWF< J < WNSQS•Sn W¢$IW i arpowW �I�ii'u ac�i� v O F J F Y 2 u M J .Nir = V > pp Fw�Wry 1 .O• w • 4 Y w•Oi O =Y� OU »O 1 W O + w w NN O < WN°ryW Y N N� Y aJiY 6VV •^ u - air°. °aN YW zo i •=i ° w N W w w •L• F P •Wi m� F¢mi o N � �SWrrto M •LrF UU <JN <i. -.wr °e i iri W m F i ._. Qo FO °om .. `cu WV iu.M.<i�or o t Y Z u Q V u i zwF Ji Q o�mrQ- °aL2N� i Q i o Q u o x N uw i�i�Q W •� 2 w�•N• <LL '• QW'OS•V(�w�V J 1 ' Q .• Mrjy C Fy S W �NnO < {J 2 Y <F1�6FWWW¢ p W I N V UJV p V Z O aiVYYY °I « { « { «4< h� � F �� =^ M ON P p p O PPpFaN P ryw0 ^N „rypm0 � 1 � N a m e FNNNF y' 1 ry a w ry.Pi .Oi P w w N.Pi w i.Fi w .• P P P i M wq Y �! f ':ZwGZ:v4, 7.Z..9" ... a.. .a4 I.. g9v n. gon M 0 ... ;W..a ns.itz H.- z AM ir ,am I �1-11. sm�. -}"Mmrm. w". AFa Fz� a I Cn Vy�MPgMMPPVNPJgMNwNNNNNVNqMPPNNMNpNPPNM ID ..4� 0. . .......... ...... ............. 7 p ^arrNOaFeNOOOnpnooprar NpPpnNrppod +pnpgY� O^ rrr+ OrnrPapOPOPNpOrrP •- pOONNN000dNpn0 .pa .•i ^�NNip ^000_aN ^Y^dwnPn.•r nPNOY ^OOrrar n Nn rlr�P^ dOprpryPF a^PYNNnrdn_FNOONOn ^M1P a ON hd dNn NPNN ^M1O L < 1 N r! P a r N N 1n ^ p SI p f. f 1 IdF�PmeNnrNdFOPOMNnrN d •.000 ^N nr N'8000.Oi .^i .Nini��a O OOOOVOVOPPOPPPPPPPO00000 $; NNNNM1NM1NNNryNryNNNNN NIiN N CryNM1NNryNNNNNNryNNNNhN j 1 u11 LW .Li• WW 2u VIA v YF�•W.i ? 1 �rF i.Fni J NN MwN WQ•N.V^ .Fi w a i W¢¢R •` ¢Ra �� RtPd,rNUQ« -cl <al.i a RLia. ¢R __ i __ P•WWp uWUQe y ` 2 S Sr =Vx1^ J Z<WN 2 OZPSw O f_ FN•-f ^WNwNn YNdrr � pp NYO ooa i of pp Nnm�^ N `a zrpfpN WWuuu U YYU YV�2YUN i=YSno V Y�oJYOU.Ni ¢C IJ a w 1LJ6 V : OoOUO 6 F02`io rN "iiiNr a�NJRio sWZ� �u �zWU6 +iW� r Q • ] JmLLW pW fib RW¢ 61 �r SLN OUW� � Or OpOJ�6¢ �Y ¢L�YY21 NI OC6N_00 NR PFWN R 00 .NN LL67NNJ__M 74 OOrF� WI 4NN�LLNYw `,2M1_ tY S 4 •f ^�3��VUWLLLW pl J�OV <WV J6WP pJW ¢WONw6VYi QJV „�'i <nYWLr62Y T.S SW000YnK� Y< �Jp_N NO�, 6! RTNw_ YNN6YJptNONW <Y GNM<6aR YO 40 NO <4f_YO<_JW <JZ W_<J 6 6J U m4Nm ON U6JOSN N��[ N PW IS. u� .ii O 6, ` 10_W4¢�iNn< ��lwaw�¢J� ¢ ,pW�aj .ir4�2 ^LLNR ,c4 64WJN <WNNZ :N�O22 n >��✓``� y1N Oi aWUJPWNi�`ip1N¢IJ {2b^2•.ti 2JSV00- •NO <YtNF¢ �YYO¢LY <Or¢y Cp GG CC 1 • W Z N � 6 1 4 N 42 p W_NC. N ; W JV ^rV < .-V 020NU_ JV Sw V o i = Q < • OV Y ll^ Y�Y Wwu jY Oi OMW LOORRV20_Y V ¢ 1 = In T iW YYW ON N16= 6w4 CO uu�.. iazJ us u �iia Ji Puri .J..^ -� wi N.pilt�4wLNw:O0w�YrtwHRyy�oywi�w= rthL�2V�CNJ WY`<iO.4nuVN<Y=iJ �W O.lVN2�V<01Vit1Wi�iYUVYW�VY< N �OLFWw4uli {J <VWFV WJS S.O. OCO OINNYNN O.J 1_ {Yi L SJ UWNSRS=O``WSH • V Wit ZS J ¢VN NNNVJ�S6 Zf 2NNJtl Y¢7W J!TOJFVR ZO iOJO_,O�NYUni m � <,u_wWNpuWwsp <¢J «WW_e � O OWWWWOJ4444UmYYN <ZYZFSNQNN_7U- •1JIJJJJJJY6 ^ Y 1 N <1 FOnnPnn++dNrPlyda aOrNNVnrryra`GNnFrNON! 1 61 ONNnF ^NO ^On ^IPa�J OrNdp OOFN FPanNO ry ; PPNNlF� ^w ^� ^ ^N wn�d »mod ^NPPP� ^d NwP ^..n wnN w 3 ■ s. %t • r 'i��` n�ctu.- .x7 =•'u yy,�:_�•q- 4��rot!a,Fw - I ^. s. ?n�•cc;Fr;.•5. 7{: �+ � tniNNropP u ruPyyruwN as +Pi+ue a �I e�YJ'x.. �' f'� •` YNOOPUUPrrdNyrUNeeymPOpPPOrNOUp Nr<yp ri.M yN,19:+�' •+Y ������ NrJ'1•JNJrPYwOmNO�•LIO NMONwyPy.O JwyiJOyw)PNrPO � 1 >t r _ .µ .y` LyN/�PMNNNNNN a >a' a9T999.Otl99pOn�ixi0aii `Im ~ M' 440 y -. Mm2Z » »1T �• _ _� >aa°rm »> }iD O> >rrm�2f~�m.s `..i }}!(j N>aiFiii nTy C((�xX wCmiti9TOnIx _m SpyPmnAOpm 1 .�t. NN r :°.r lm•ITOyyr N•••�. �2Z0mp2i >NPATwT adK20N YT+>iST . � M ..� 1 >m Ey nTNpO yNMNO >rMrT.• ..S \ipNa >m �_ • �. <••nnrrT2m>rPp 2 1 y' apy, �iMNnPSZZaASm�lyy n �NrNmy aNree >o r `r o ar s �i. r9nn99aN >a�mmnm t � ^ :t, �'�� oNmn=1 nnstlms aly.aN rirnr �� CxDOy >aDrMDm r: 111 s p z� �coov Pi zo � >amm >A- ° oP aooNmmy e i �� i eiw> sv'�ir rnNai „rs tl i 9r wl= yyti >�° m oNZV n�� T9c x•nza zs�i,l • u yT s>.as lrll e'>i �. mmz IS. PSNr9 a �• ma ywyn °O 1DiMrIGrN /)(�� � cC )�= + 2 0a N „m j _ nM oy onzF yM�mr}IN O im N • n< N 1 N > synd _ AT of.°c nl°p. Nn i S o=yr & a y •" a n ylm 1 ur�� � rwre1 m Z .Ca AOOni _j 1.h mSS�nriil>nln sitlinSnlNno mix >:in °�N"I ws i>tlzas °o °�IZ+iaNQn� i • iy{� r0(x �yypYd O•Y>NmT <314OTyOmrr U_w SDDMn'GrrO)� �r yOr m+ O µ r Np 9i s>A 9aJrr'r a �n3a.( re ay iin9 >§� fNi OY1 M a ^nl;.M mTyrPp �.y T> •(K DmPmO'Nmu YNj••.y n�wi y0 TTT a01T 2 C npzmyNN n« Nlr S! m a m n Hzze°mrvi admen iy V02* Z iTli� ��yezn V9 NTT A+Y20 aC9 YC• ° am., � m Y 11 =9'$ n yNf NN INi11m r139 �•Oy TTTN ��x :�" �C DpTT my �r w JrPrP y n •raMnr ST�.N• "hY PPNy i r• r3to ° n rr o�� x z m i r 'a no.y. • zwo i _ nn nnoN nnn � nn nn z n n nz1N.zn nNn i Pyz coy r >° o° > ° ° aFrlN+o ory 1 P` 2ppS AAA a r A T wx•Zn>m wn �u �m0 mm aaCT arp _ aD y p D amSwD piA I a y' yrIC^ 1ti .4y yy Ilpl r 1 y m T � � S a M IZ,. .Pi Iwn .2.1 •Sil a M •ii. M n lil lin ma .',•. Iii1 m N O _ Cn NNNN4NNNNN4NNMNNNNNNN N�INN4MNNNNNNNNNNNy4N Ili (1 PPPM�PPPPPP PPPPPPPbPRPPPPPPPPPPOPPPPPPPPP IA T { yP wf VNrOOPSPP1V440•u00 .ViPJiuNr OOeyOPi VINyrOiOy ; 1 y � > JP J 1> > p�yNOUN �.". rr y"I .rnN ov °yva�oai ww °y �.pi•II..P a ur •".. i PPyf I•J wrf PEMdP rpp MyU INPyVOw•pm NIIU�11Un..........p 1� J 00° OM1( OOPNOPVNOONOPONPUNPOiOYDpu�O�yOry00 1• • Y », .y Y ?tt Y � v ¢ < y ° 3 y` < ■.. °ooin °olog °o �IN- .9...•.00 °o..°+.P+IN - + °o 'ar.o ioPnriyoN :.ni coil: ,pr'N'...'.o- Y..vnoNi ci mion a °On .N.< hNww°.a��Frwro °.P. �.°..wip» qp r ^ of 1 °r oaao`aaa °aaPa °Fi-n nn F1°. r° -rF °pF °000anoY°I .Fi q °Pm ,, SI NhNM1NNryNNNryNryNNNryNNNM1M1NNNhNNNryryN pV T Lu..Giq G W Y _ L 1 zzzo :i is uuu� u .-u uu w s n i�WGi Gd .�i s RAJ x.uW g ¢OWE :FN uu N : ° : c:t+: W�aFVnJ W�1 uzu31's o WWOWO�� •W-o W WF'¢W ilNilr Ni &.n. �.° r 2 iJ 00 { pfY6 Y�¢ryO2AN N`JYVj�OrJ � grNW J'L'L Y N � W N >N Y V OY�YOZ6N ULr.p[F¢YrJ u2i' 14�yY 606YVM �F�ON'"O <jL6 qrY <Of «p�WOt wl 1pJrY t �US���Y JYY.W {WrY R06 W'G� '�1 ^N »��pYJ OrY O.Yy nWgJ�WNYP pp2 pCpFpO Ow�pjPNNY9000LN6�Y6N.GNN j.�P VYSr�i ¢ Y 1 Y G{ r s p 1 =<MNY O p O < prrN n S J O Y 1 m OWWOi ¢ S6 YISL OY VY t 1 N Y'J p < <N OfY pWr �tV !L tJ VL 02r 2< ZS > Q i Y' n000Nr Z { OFVrF �Vrr NWQ¢ 1 i FSYWiJJJnu o° GOO WWQYS N�Wr •¢ <`W" «fl OV UQN Jr2W� YFL Y6.tJ 1 VYY06NW O Z U�NWWirWY �LWr C 'orWYYY _ JOWWW ¢JrJJW . ..F LL� r Nio�a Sd uaW W¢ °ov�Yj. J °'�'1i¢u�J a`Yw � J N JSSNaN JOO <3 rL S>N2324i.0.. sN 222L2SYW OWWWj ��'. WO O G J i GFFrrrr¢ >� S�VM1.F jYFF¢YNZ• yr70'J 770fWYaG YrO rrIW4 NNNy6J <WW a 1 JNON MNONrro� <¢¢zzz NN MNFM�YrFOJr�jSIy/ 42YG.� jOON YI <1 FNNFpPFpNgf pf ar wFffggllO F P'r rFgN"N 1 G. OYFNNN^o1NNNOPNNFM1ryMOFrNFp aw.OP^ N 1 w w wNgN'wrMVOf ��PNFVY.N p =OM J - w s' NI saaei- Niwinia.Nis< YaNYNiwy 7.00 fJMf..N�NPPVfNr�OPYYY_ OP ♦ f �,j M r • � �IJ f 1 nll l.n Onnnnnnnm00 LTm rmMU>iNS >.>ny> TC > > IT P nn +: Yi zzrram >DJ�v�a �+ es :1 > y^ n N PaJP fiK #wy_w Pz Nzvmoo T >_�y >i° .._ r S oC O T^apw T1R= opy�«naNP merF n.°..r.. °s nrpso Ti 11 : >fily onzNZrJNarw� �� P e ti. v �e w �Nr >Myyi Ri Fa°Y JnJ °M3 a 1 n nTM OJL n.+T. QT w0 9A TDTN!_m EL'oz sa tii rw:yN�o r�pz° i L py a^ «� T a c >n a • 1 N � 1 n n P • 1 1 NTT Cm SnmV >wiP N+e POa °J._T9 ° nV ! w 1 „yF_NZp ya PN>orrN }N} VSNmNp +wze�cprN+T _ D J > ° ><o1TJJT >TlllnV�yTMSNT> T!» N Y S>rd2y >A N SaOyJyy >N.+O tTJn yDa >n a QN mnNNTms SO(mN =Mr 9n +rP na rar+ �c� wm iw a+ ►zr SrTT �rro�imrTT+ net e cl zz sl8oe./.+ N zo pa J r T n• i^` zwN ciw nw s+ T8l HE- 8i1 > enz T P 1 n ^A_ Nea Ny a °wr�'^o vycgN ���e "tee 1 N la z• ssNr m z A aA 44 i nnT� a A � TmT3J .TiT N r 1 Aa DNny_ a2 nnn nL n M OT i�M D n OPI r yy. O 000 r i >> a ai. aaa nN a i a er. MM�N� ^IJY UNN�FNNMMNyNNUNNN�NNM4NM�yNNNMU j }S (E YMYJJ��IJJ ~.JMYJJpY~pNp yyrJJJ P > ?PPPPPPPPPPO V.T YN�pyOJPNf Ny.JiOdOYPNJVN�Of mJPM�YN:wq:O: Ip SO N.f....f . NoOP.fgP.O_OPPuPaVPOopp4 J+ °-Vg-g- 00N000ppO V0p0MO P.Op POOeM . OJMVOOP 1f > IY 9/ .1 S J rwq y, 1 �J l ���...fff 1 ON nnPwO 9 9 M1rydOO�rT0w,,ppnO Tn 000rnOPOOnaO nTaaO OnarynphONOOnryNhOaPl Pf afpTaO ry 1 On«^ nOnNOPrynlnryTpOhhONnNPnhnwOrvO +NO OOary•p x fN abrvnwNrN Y�rhNhrwnoo^ }ahryr�none9N�hh y �� n won n aN nr P^ rn r T S ahnPOwNn +nahOpOrrvnrNahnPOrrynrnah OPOwNn +Na FryrvnnnnnnnnnnM +T +r +r +r ++NNNnnnNNNnaaaaaaa Y <1 yrwwh��hw- �rha•- gw•nn�.niwh -wwhww �r-I .h4 rhir NwwhNwhha "h 'J � Z� NNryNrvNrynNNNNryNNryryryryNNNryNNNryNnM1rvNryNNNNnNryN i! t I iWW C y YC a b WY W u- i :aaaQ a Qa a F aQ a i �saaQ Wu .r 1 u0000io ao uI o maoo 0 00< Jooe u oW ZYYyYNY Yyai U �nYY y e� }JaNYyy pO yJ 1 J zOr w p wIz JaJy yi fa�Wpn Qa •iZ•Ub fly Q O W C� L YO"YW... =JN iL OW i b s3 gVg" � o` �" "el<<•WiI Y'3.oyYl usi •yy yfd ri iNOU 5 S'•y.•"Q JOB Nii'l `L ONNGO oa•"ai{{ lia � �y rnr N yyO " rFrV�S O �Q OI 1�=W NJ•Wi• C tN6 JQiJ�- uWaW�O -ep "ly W „WrJ C; wOi h CnW ^U NOI.•h3 ry 5Vgg2WVVOl {�JaW }hNOVf{+ 4W0 aWUS •' i�ol- y3•NU`WlyNl3oSol. :."'Iw g`oFSWI°WC��WI`.•`�:3ic ^1 ^M2 ^N O�N••W VW< 1 Ff YOwW•aa "J ^f �•aiL ea'•/lW+`iMnWOWf Wy1 .+ V) p OOWbn� GNr00hLi�OWlN }WQO<P al- r>iYOnPiNO <VNONONYan I y Y W 4 I > u w ^ ti O N 1 S p O WY O •.•r W OO 0. 1 1 W•Zi`Gn V p U aV •Zn N >r N•VU UWip 6 I fn•pl�n f[ W WhN �O 6 •<nJY lyWW �WV i z.`. ratW3 o A.M <•N•1 N��y -Rl l'1 z«•L-o ole LOr .- y 1 pQJ S h2 }NR J QW yMU09 Wvr2� YuWOW 'la� F�3arOS � >JON6 Wl+ OJ 0 1 {{{�� N <WOiW NOQYN6Wf O` "VIJnV - {OUJi i0 }yh >LL�hJ Z� j1 O ol$O N..J` J b uiW }jiZS {G-Jfy fW N pOaN hN WN fW4y JI�tJ J6 an jYZi YOOyY N Lf;4=: Ow^YOW fa }Nf {hONj C fZ }MW M. JW VhWa ^n }f V �hLJ Sa`�Wh n V�j f C NVJOJLZZWai� WI+YWQyJCLUOVJ W b W; uVVOfC000WW O,ONYVUVbVbtibZOi22NMw wlL.lN wMO 'p N <1 NhNwr. pnNhPNhOPnMnaah "NpnTOVnPOpbwrrnPOMpw � 1 6 OOH+ f+ na�hYrONhrvnn ^nahnMlNaOnn +naannaOhah N ; Pn' f�bPlhrr »raw yyn�hh�MyP�rrweMrPNw� ,l " r :v / ryi+!4 f � '�;.�' S.- `'1i�3'.�'` - \'a 4`�I�;l.,'),' -- • -✓;o .�. - ,� �` -1. -�'r. rsy.iT`µWL'. 'y .�f� -.,`per 1. :�`�"'ss+y�icy,dL3y�.�rtitm�^G�. :,P: `�..i ;s :��'E:ti:•tti,M�Y; _�F +V '�sJUPNd id }1PYPOOJdd JdNdO {JJJ} ' gy`OMV�OV� �Sh' -N_1 ;_'�'lF'tCf - NOMJPMJVV }PV JP��\\MOPlIV PJ }ON 1�ydl \JJVO dJVNM 9 1 T�Y`y POaPVO �VNYYPP11Mp }PdONPJMOSVY9OOMOOJY }OP }i� -T ± -h}� Oay TOTO ' NItN 100. {.N134y1S ULY \ r AA ,T Y' CZ4 !nn «Lsg i1geS: >sLiTm i SP - .•.+''., slrw e!•ra owSie :LN<e zi ia�y .sNg.. .tJ •[IS:: AZ pTrsi> rp -•z �T°INwaii�rminFg yey w_sm 'fwg azg NT iy '� ,•i 'nsOC2 TwTas \w� 1�TNNMMnL9T Nl� n SZpP yQ , -.. ilk ww n <rpso r n amoV PT srinrP• ^T a1h 1 ' LT ON.TN !m 11160wip CS D 1.1f ► n Y>r Lmeg l��1 O DrnT ny VNrw ib 1P YnPOn a l \,) ff yMw VTa££ 1N aZNNTf�iz;!V N lgNyh -{ sP SN$gP. c4� yYnIL -- g I..! -�oJ iiTgi ;op i'NC °ao>`y w'. tX S;gO NNi p yT IIMP Iti O_y T.",('S Z � n O = 10•) S[ nrl0 n� <6r NIaiT Np p A n O = 1 0 0. N i `- ZG 1 - .a 1 � • I 1ZS1� rY1Ww }^L}^ f'S <yy LnL--2 a(1�y�y�s}l y^yy'ym��» oa \\<TSMZD�OZi!\.lTOYN•)TYYYYYM NT10LlNn �y0•lNJwpOl�rN aD aeg s�a�i�+a ilnilmc ! _qq (� 1 K• .a.n T 9r C f 11nn pI/��NNNT N TT • N rr �•Z-IP Dl�Z..T w a M n nNn fl�TnsI�MP^1/ Te rr a oNep�ar o ymYnm LJr 1T .• �new�fi^� f {1•. _ ��Soy sTeDg ia' - , - 0 0 �+ n •�aNOnO i + 6 Dr On 1 lSn O n m q P P P PTDi Y D D TZ D 1 y Cn FV NeN` N�NNyNn�rnr�Hl�r�i�rNM�M4M ^4MNNNN�NNN)/N i ; ±0000000dddOOO~Oq \IbOb OOTOpOOyyy.JI4�IMMyyPPP �a O PP }VY VOd�VPP }V VVCIdOJPNJ VNw OiOYPPIYM VOdPJ 1 2 Cs1 • 1.P m Pu1J.P� }Nd�NlPOPO IYNJVVlNV NMI.�ON'y VO} YNM WN }d {� iPONN d}JY }NO WOO NNMMNNPYGG N }MNV }Pw NNJP40 V T �, V'd WOJO }OJdO N} O C� .11 000 J yd0} d0 i• • ) } JOMGgONOPOddOOPSSSSSiOSOSOS000SOS 00 }S}O S x • s. •� n °m O O1w4.M1 POOn$ °0000 o- .O•NPh°f 0 °$POrwdrvmNOPM1001�mOwM ° s i niNO° On�ryl °il <wnin$°. °Y.ry..M1.d.°.�.°.n $N $a Pm n °n'�ri Y.l l°.i NiPne^li V QI a Q 1 N •• N1n N fp Z t � mPOwryNYNdhOPOwryNYMOwOPONryNYNd }OPOwNI'IIYiM1� O QI OOwwww..-- ••wwNrvhNNNhNNNII .INN N.'I j� Z� NN NNNNNNNM1NNNNryryNNNNNNNNNNNNNNryryNNry N•VNNryN Y 1 N N ¢N_N jN_NNNNNN_N 1 WwW OW O I•Ci CCWSW y \ 1 W NrK w•rnrIr < 1 W WV warnr�W L•~iW F.•wW rwr N WIW� WoI QQaW NWIzI iQ .l .Q ,x Qa¢aQQaQ¢ .° aW� VWH o�'•Y• iW-� l zszz J .z. ooeJQWOJ N omJnre�oaooauo WW JJm i W< uuuNiWUN wauuNiuuuuuuuuu ar Mas X11 r` 4N �y y nJW� r 1 NJUQ e� rN4nN YY`U ~N2 Y n N N ♦N 448 mYYf Jry��N J N� �Nr NM NYIIUiIa �.n N7 . n WN um ¢n."•:zm O z mad W irQW � O °rW-s I F.}i6 SYI.x U O •i2¢ Y< J Irn uJiOZWWUpr u. <•n Qi ooh �d $¢o Nuw o � o Nz LJZY& oopW Ni o WoJe� erm Nza u ai}w¢ <a o }��r zJ sN } W !WN {N�JaJNgo z � w $mi�•NZZ N3 zirm u..yy u NN�zzri OI , fW j' ¢W+WW 6NW6 CJSW6o� P \Y Iyf� •C.�1 iZ ao— oK `rf Y� <eNi iU60 P<QtlU< t {rW y J�J nY`N6^ >JYS Y¢N ` N w 6W¢6Nr I i]L Ow�� <if[J 6W••w SI•QJ }Oy= PwSONSU nS I�NQ¢72 rl ppp e.•pppp((������Q %G¢J `ma`�yy<�myy}}11WQ jWn 1'•+I II<yyO �• 8 UNNU WaOV 2<Wy W'lr OC�'w�6NL<OZr.OSGNS JtL�LP lIY•1P •nwi•NnPMIJ11J6S000f6 i ux� p pp pp pQ I q =•xi V VVVVUVB 2U'L �6 1 Y J SY n"x NNeONNeNV� UG s W! 1N 2 1 1 1 I ; 1 �J Y NJ4 Y<! i • i° J rQ<, a O QY WYNWF¢F u `` y W < i S W Y I¢Z f W welil w wleil.eilW WU Oo 6N {4Y <t< W ^A ti O -M C 4jj L466&96 OJN O rh. o ' G IYn lCiiw •Wi •Yw i•14.• w.Wi •Wi QOJNq. 1 { °!. N• -ai u� svp•M.:o npo J w ol. tZ 1 o ppr �N x2�O S nrLNW JJJtJ `J JSJJ I�Ortl� µ 1 U OUS i {U • ZN 6pvYYUYVUYYUYNpQ CL�J v 1 F{r }6LLJNWW }N OW�6 YW�6 ____ 1'•L Nr 2 I 7 01•!OJ VW WOUOL][tx 6W t6y1W �Sf N w1 {Z tr NOYVY±NNU6YIU 6QQQ� N{6j< O � VSU pOpNVNI�YWrWWWr WJ•y� MWO¢ w ;OW ••6m22 Q6W°OJ JNNN7Y'22 =SFSFSSIC Stl COJ LYVJNWW° :J6 L iS. J OomYr {{2 'J'M >ppm W2is <rWrr<iFO�Jp o'J..... HE—HiNH, NNVNNNNON%NNNNNNN NVeIN NMM I�rtlJ O YI ry {1 OMNNOEddNdPNMryrNOwmddNNN }}hMM1•PYNOON w..INPd N nl PdPN °dNO+•M1Pf M.N•PNdNYNPYNNNNNNNNNPNYNNNPPPN 1 w M ..1 N w w .•w 7 0 1� � k i 'r :sY�....,'i rx e.Ni •aka• r.� = a:Jyy++ ..y:t:3+•, :�.�ky;.r k' :r.iti Cwt ,. _ s ' +?�`r �`v�i° `= :. Jl"j'3,`:Y+555y s �•v,� °�i�+e {� _ .w -•.- LA 9js • q ,nnn nyFbnnn VO I •' ' aaiN =1-i u,.lN ab• {• •"N ' Pad. r�� y a0ua qr VP}OOV VV SY u r ' .� I.INYT�wx �MliilAZ In`' N ,�� 1 feln� A OrTT Mn,Tt 1 N , R TN� TIiYNF i 1 •�• ' VNNMq NVOi,NMN� la O TNIwxTDOODMrG 1 T' fa I Y • V 1r IY O Y O P N Ib F O pVypyl,V VpYpPaMppONPOpV IZ N � Ir }OP�00 M TLp 1 O I .a� i 1 s } � '1 � ANN ; a'•>[Y °wn q ,nnn nyFbnnn VO I •' r•00 ITOOO ° y n nxT nm�pMZ i 1 v C i iaa a� xDLD I t m A N rf•, r (=iv F DP•, h 1 f^ N NN`y- N -NN -N It S VNNMq NVOi,NMN� la O yPPP NrOaO VPP}VNMOa 1� L I Y • V 1r IY O Y O P N Ib F O pVypyl,V VpYpPaMppONPOpV IZ N � Ir }OP�00 O�pN }VSOY tl• � YA �Rw( Flr_',�_ ; °ALIe..Y -e ^9. -}:i• .ff L - .l� I �/� fit TO 17H . ILI Z-3 I c ! I I §| : ; ; ;!l��,I jig / ail mt NJ 42 1 r1l ■ D I �/� fit TO 17H . ILI Z-3 I c ! "dC -V � -�, � �,., ". �" ' M .... .. may' J%s -V 1� � '% Y 't I A all Ig I A as f I I& I I I Is* I I H m •p NA V gir IRE wx IF all lj*y vcj a j:21, Of 3X.S.r a x 8 X's 2 8 as P�!P 9 A 9 9 11 f A Visa 31 r, 91211 X668 ? 91 =a its l6�`!o`�L45�d1E�98�385�l�aaine is rg rii Sri is) usis a Sri i r. ri:. ja a j lip [Fos �11 I Vw R. a ERREURSIVet 0 �SBaiFExR�SRc "_EFpdEd Aa7c8Ba? e a ac3as a as ad ad asagc ass as ;. sasasaaaassas a aasa :asaaaa :assns :ass :ass fffff #fff #f ## # f #ft #f # #ff# #fffff #ff # # ## ;fff fifiifi3 #fiif # :sfsdiff#ifffffaiiiififfksi# Be = E9a0G�R1E3�E Q Q9= �3Rs3£A9 RRRe a -a G g� �a3Ea����gaar � ��;G- �asnnp��g�nfs�En�aaaa�a� g� �a� "- fia���saar q��eAaEe��n�eaaasep��n�a��at saasassasssa: s asassssassssssssssssasssata: gid 51 ;s #i #fs# ;ffff a fffesff #fffff #f #fsiii£fsgfff an aaasssasaas :a s sssassssasassa :s�sssasassass f fff #f # # #ff #l'fQf #I# #ff #1(ffff# � sfiiscifiii 6 4 c asiifiifffiisg:�fs =iiiaspaf# _. 3S�3�gtg 2g as -aggvg �3_agio3 II_f_a eas 9 �Gag��yga�1�gg sgl��� a5 _3� �q3 afill �{ e na 3 t. 3 .c aa6aahsaaaaaaa =8•a�E�9na9s�a �s�, E jpgj�Ba fr R�C�a-,I5iii,1111J€ ", ■� � Nair s a a sCp�j E° �- 3a g26$ age a 5a a 3 22 a1 i i Pii aaaaasca'aaayE i aiisiii' si' s 's- s "s- ss- s- syssssssassassaazn� � „�- .�; - - - -- • -i,��; iii+ �arY+ ip4�i5i�l Fiaa� l�f�5�B6[iiY$ilf5tli�aa6ip¢6H:5 - rrr -� -rr rr. r ��rrtrrr- ;.r`;+, .. r3'F. r -r 'siiii�b3a lag $gag caaaa�3S3EV -3 a' &3Ea6BE JE53-'s aa,�ar�3saUH trpa gja- sii; a5a;' pafiiaagayjii5is8asa_- s$giaa6�y$ ,��� 8 € €€ € € € € € € € € €€ z F838 ssssasassasssez saasessssssssassss, -ss Sax rsss s ���iaaa�a�a�J��ajjr� lg5a� p; a a85e- SagL` Ue85Caa' cL��Ei- ecsi>tfic5= ii�'s3�'agEsScas El k ■ Y 1 •�• If 'E £ - ERRxRa a ii9 8 5 ^qi8 ? 2565 O G JJ�iJ .f i as d� 1111a1 28214 Hall 11 'a a i a y Ei t= i RRiSAa Q iii i fi=RE O fA3 a E F £9 i Faggot � itc$ @ (iCi4 i nHI g S 3EEg3q a 2115 R !i,°_YA 9 ji0i v 5 s 4 �j�g 9A 4! 45 ?F5 a FICE F ?5BE 5 4331 Q H 2 i BSrl 95 E EFFi�E4 F{f MIA 15*1 a d J: J J.: �:.. J_ .: .: JJ r @ ii 1 I #R#RQR a a f i L gyp p; ss i ! iiiii i ilI # iiI�031 fe51 E t f J W if A E RRLE Af Q iif f Ei�R! C f =QS R R 3 3 �¢ !• i! E # X61 # # #.� 4 ## 9 # #s## =14 2 -b I ±# Q$ iffliF i '!i s {YCa$ i -s?j4 n Y R 22 2!S P 82 ■8228 82 E 2 fi 33 282 -c2 3:0 H MN HIN 8 SIR A!III if lk 71 as 8 9 I 1321 6-3 s$� 51f1s4 B gill � hG I = sL l � �52 -. Y II %5 .l �.i INS l�^ ^ o f : _ _ - ■� e # - - J` § •� f $ 4� 44!!§§!4! §! ! ! § ! ■ .. � ■ | | | | |�� | f� ! | | |! ■ || | _..�. ■ | | § ■ ■ | ■ || | || |� |� ■� | , | !, § | | | ■ | || , | | | || ; | | | | | | | ■; | || || | 10 ` , £ ; � ; • | | | � \ , � w f : _ _ - ■� e # - - J` § •� f $ 4� 44!!§§!4! §! ! ! § ! ■ .. � ■ | | | | |�� | f� ! | | |! ■ || | _..�. ■ | | § ■ ■ | ■ || | || |� |� ■� | , | !, § | | | ■ | || , | | | || ; | | | | | | | ■; | || || | 10 ` , £ ; � ; • | | | � \ y'� •+'H .s, y .x` et. ;old,:? .:l�r�'i 1: ' :.. t.•- � .'- iYv`5'P "y K;._n• Sr °e 4�eyr.,� w I '' ,1•f y•1 V9 � � • � Nl \. Mw11 , `� f� ,{((j ■ Ile'�� u ��` f°7 �B >,•..1 "�1�R; � 'YilQE •� �_' YAK 4� ! . . all _ 1 ■y it fr j� ii■ ks r Y • 1 ^� r fP�ya_� it , Y � V fJ. ;a:= • r CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: March 2, 1988 UK To: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager Prom: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager By: Karen McGuire - Emery, Associate Park Planner Subject: The solicitation of appraisals for the General Plan designated North East Community Park. property It is recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission that the City Council authorize the solicitation of appraisals for the North East Community Park site, a General Plan designation, located in the Etivanda area. DACKGRO M: The City is interested in purchasing property in the Etivanda area to fulfill the General Plan floating designation for a Community Park site in this location. Staff has researched the Etivanda a:oa and believes that this property is a good candidate for the future North East Community Park site. Respectfully submitted, 4Re 7� ont�nnger RAR:KMc -E:ba 19 RESOLUTION NO. $ -Q A RESOLUTION OP TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING MITEOUT PREJUDICH TENTATIVE TRACT MO. 12579, AN APPLICATION TO APPROVE A MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT cOMPRISED OF NINE UNITE ON .99 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDYUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OP EELLMAM AVENUE, 225 FEET NORTH of NINETEENTH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) RICHARD AYOUE has filed an application requesting the title of this Resolution Tract No. this Resolution,ithe e subject tentative tract map request shall be referred to as the "Application." (ii) On October Sd, 1987, the Planning Commiasi0n"Bf the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on tho Application. At the request of the applicant, said public hearing was continued from October •24, 1987 to the regular meeting dates of November 10, 1987, November 25, 1957, January 31, 1988 and January 27, 1988. (iii) Following the conclusion of the continued public hearing, on January 27, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. 88 -11, thereby denying the Application without prejudice to refile. (iv) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -11 was timely appealed to this Council. (v) On February 17, 1988, this Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to such appeal and concluded said heari,.g on that date. (vi) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. D. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. ao Ordinance No. Pago 2 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced February 17, 1988 public hearing, including the 37 -page staff report included within the February 17, 1988 agenda, public testimony and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -19, this Council specifically finds as follows: (a) The Application applies to approximately .69 acres of land within the Medium Residential District and located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, ,.orth on Nineteenth Street; (b) The property to the north of the subject site is located within the Medium Residential District and is developed with a driveway and landscaped area for the Alta Woods Townhouse development to the east of the oubjuct site. The properties to the south of the subject site are within a Medium Residential District and contain existing single family residences. The property to the east of the subject site is located within a Medium Residential District and is developed with multi - family townhouse residences. The properties to the west of the Subject site are within a low residential district and are currently developed with single family residences; (c) The Application as contemplated requests the approval of the Subdivision Map, conceptual plot plan, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan and building elevations ^+ for the development; '- (d) The Application as submitted proposes the ';- development of nine dwelling units consisting of 1,791.81 square feet of living area for each unit. The total square footage of the building area on the site (including garages) is 18,966.18 square feet. The net density on the site as contemplated for the site is thirteen dwelling units per acre end, given the overall size or the proposed site, the nine dwelling units requested are the maximum number of units which could be allowed on the property; (e) The Application as contemplated would be contrary to the goals and objectives of both the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and would be detrimental to the existing persons and properties in the ims;ediate vicinity of the subject site for the reasons as follows: (i) The density of the site as proposed is not compatible to the adjacent properties. The Optional Development Standards within the Development Code are provided to 11 Resolution No. Page 3 ;4 allow development at the higher and of the designated density range. Theo& standards are intended to achieve a superior quality and compatibility for developments of such projects. The standards and expectations are above and beyond that which is basically required to ensure transitions and buffers from lower intense residential uses. Tha Application as contemplated has a density of 13.0 dwelling units per acre. The existing multi- family development to the east is at a density of 11.3 :.`welling units per acres with the remaining neighborhood in thi density range of 2 -4 dwelling units per acre. Accordingly, based on- existing development standards and the nature of the surrounding area, the proposed density will not be compatible with existing neighborhood quality. (ii) The project as proposed does not provide a gradual transition from one land use to another. As an- infill - site, this project must reflect the character of the overall neighborhood. The Hellman Avenue neighborhood character is that of low - profile single family residences which is not reflected in the 30 -foot tall by 79 -foot long building located at the Hellman Avenue street frontage. (iii) The project as proposed does not rolato the mass and scale of the building proportionally to the site Giza, street setback and open apace. The 30 -Loot tall x 79 -foot long building is located at the minimum street setback allowed. Larger buildings such as this require more setback area for a balance of scale with the adjacent: single family uses. The landscaped open space on the project site is basically limited to the front setback and the rear 20 feet of the site. The open space does not appear to be an integral part of the project, designed to enhance building design, as well as public views on the site. Many of the landscape planters that are intended to buffer large building walla or adjacent properties are 3 feet or 4 feet in width which may inhibit plan growth. (iv) The architectural character of the projcct an proposed does not promote the expectations of superior quality based on the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Development Code and General Plan. The structure is basically block in form with little variation in roof outline. The height (30 feet) and bulk are not representative of the Hellman Avenue streetacape. (v) The adverse effects of the projcct, as set forth above, could not be successfully mitigated by the inclusion of specific design conditions. as Resolution No. Page 4 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this council during the above referenced February 17, 1988 Public hearing and upon the specific findings of fact Be,; forth in paragraphs 1 and 2, above, thin Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The Application an proposed is not in Dovel Bmont Coda the th, eaCltyroLolRaneho Cueamongaieral Plan and conformenc6 with Of (b) The Application an proposed will be k• detrimental to the pubic hoalth, safety or welfare and will be materially injurious to the properties and improvements in the vicinities: and, (c) Evidenco presented to this Council has identified substantial potential adverse effects of the design and improvements specified in the Application. - 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in pararahs 1, above this Application. l hereby denies, ad 3 S. This Council hereby provides notice to Mr. RICHARD AYOUB that the time within which judicial review of the decision the reresented pro y Resolution visions ofCalifornirCode ofuCivil Procedure governed Section 1094.6. 6. The city Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a cartified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested, to RICHARD AYOUB at the address identified in City records. 1968. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of mayor I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, held on the day of 1988, and was finally passed at a raga ar meeting of t e City CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOnuA ar STAFF REPORT �'0�� +� ., GATE: March 3, 1988 r7n TO: Ha o and MmDers of the City Council FROM: ar Henderson, senior Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 027 - CITY OF RANCHO WRONG Pro ,= e ( e a0n er House T octe 5495 nest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Hillside Road), as a Historic Landmark 027 - APH: 201 - 101 -04. I. RECOMHENDATICN: Staff recommends that the City Council approve s or ca andmark Designation 027 with the adoption of the attached Resolution. II BACKGROUND: The consideration for historic preservation status for eiS s rf uElre located at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue ar,d Hillside Road (addressed as 5495 Hermosa Avenue) came to the attention of the Historic Preservation Commission with the submittal of Tentative Tract 13621. This planned subdivision encompasses the area on which the structure in question is located, and development plans called for its removal. The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed this matter, and directed that City staff initiate proceedings to designate this structure as a Historic Landmark. This item was reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission as a public hearing item at their meeting of February 4, 1988. III HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: Research of the structure In question has Identified it as the 'Schowalter House'. The Schowatter's were an important family in the early settlement of the community that was to become Rancho Cucamonga. In reviewing this project, the Historic Preservation Commission determined that this structure is consistent with the criteria indicated as necessary for Historic Landmark Designation. Their facts for findings are included In the attached staff report marked Exhibit 'A' Therefore, the Historic Preservation Commission has forwarded a Resolution recommending approval of the Schowilter House for Historic Lantpark Designation for action by the City Council. ay . CITY COUklOSTAFF REP64 Histori.- Lan8*&rk,Desijn&t1oq 027 March 3, 1988 V'. Page 2 'rip Rcspectfully submitted. Larry Henderson Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A! Historic Preservation Comi ssJ6, Staf f Report of February 4, 1988 with Resolution No. 88.02 Exhibit "B' -,Applicatton Form for Historic Undzark Designation Res Approval olution of f --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA &rAArq �- STAFF REPORT -' �. DATE: February 4, 1988 " TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preserve` cE� on .CCo�ommi Pion FROM: marry enderson, Senior Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGH41ION No. 27 - CITY OF RANCHO roposal To designate the owe er ouse, a ocl td`at S 95 Hermosa Avenue (northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Hillside Road), as Historic Landmark No. 27 - APR: 201 - 101 -04 PROJECT AND SITE OESCPIPTION: A. Action Requested: The Historic Preservation Commission should recommend {iie City Council that they adopt a Resolution designating the Schowalter House, located at 5495 Hermosa Avenue, as Historic Landmark No. 27 and issue a Negative Declaration. B. Ill ourdtng Land Use and Zoning: Norrn - Yacan an one single family dwelling; Very Low Resident131 (less than ' dwelling units per acre). South - Vacant and chicken ranch, Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). East - Vacant, one (1) single family residence and chicken coops; very Low Residential (lest than 2 dwelling units per acre). Nest - Vacant and one (1) single family residence; Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). C Generar Plan Designations: rmiect site and All Adjacent Properties - Very l.ow Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). D Site Characteristics: The site slopes from northeast to sou was a approx mately 8 %. Three (3) residences and chicken coops currently -jccupy the site. E Related Files: The structure in question is located at the ex reme sou western portion of a 5 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Hillside Road. Nordic Revelopme t has submitted Tentative Tract 13621 to subdivide these 5 acres into six (6) single family lots and one (1) remainder parcel on which these existing hones are located. Tentative Tract 13621 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 13, 1988. HPC STAFF REPORT-_,.'' RE: LANDMARK DESIG. NO. 27 February 4, 1988` , , Page 2 II m ANALYSIS• A. Back round: The developeent plans for ,Tentative Tract 13621 designate-tne structure in question for'demolition. -' This ,issue went before the Historic Preservation Commission-on December 3;' 1987. - At that tire, the Historic ,Preiervati.Dn Commission determined that more research was needed to be capleted on the structure. This item was rescheduled to the JAnuary 7' 1988 Historic Preservation Commission meeting., At their January 7th meeting, the Historic preservation Coaatssion' :reviewed- this item and directed staff to initiate an applicatlon,to designate this structure as a local historic landaurk. B. General: The Historic Preservation Enabling Ordinance lists rew criteria needed to designate a Historic Landaark.' Theso tritaria are included as an attachment (see Exhibit 'C "). In researching The History o4 Alta Lam, California, 1880 -198u by Martha Gainer ae ei—b 41Y was MlC eTr "rmine %nee structure in mmstion, located at the northeast corner: of Hermosa Avenue and Hillside "Road 1s the Schowatter House (p. 79). The Schowalters arrived in California in 1403, and about 1911 purchased 180 acres of land on the corner of, Hermosa and Hillside in what was then known as loamosa. The*Schowalters were an Important family in the early development of Rancho Cucamonga. In comparing the Schowalter House with the designated review criteria needed to designate a Historic Landmark, it is staff's opinion that this structure is consistent with the criteria indicated necessary for Historic Landmark Designation as follows: 1. The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common, but 1s now rare. 2 The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of the historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 3. The proposed Landmark 1s connected with someone renowned, important, or of a local personality. 4. The proposed Landmark is connected with -s business or use which was once common, but is now rare. X7 n„ . 3y •f ti t ra •. . � . -D-' _ - �� f't-7 `r y .::�^ ,Y r - e � - .-. 'b' '�y L rt .`s• r.!': rts -'Yrs HPC STAFF REPORT RE: LANIMMM DESIG. NO: 27 x February 4, 1988 Page 3 C. Environmental Assessment: Staff ' has completed the nv rmmen ec s " and found ,.no significant adverse - environmental dapacts as,& result of this project, " If the: ` Historic Preservation Ccamission- concurs with these findings, then it would be appropriate for the Commission to recommend that the City Council issue a Hegative Declaration., tII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: �In order fo`r, the Historic Preservation House, as a Historic Landmark,nthe Comisslor, must find thaUter 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of the - historical period, type;= style, region or way of life; or 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common; but is now rare; or 3. The Proposed landmark is of greater age then most of its kind; or 4. The proposed landsark was connected with someone renowned, important, or of & local personality; or S. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or, use which was once common, but is now rare; or 6. The architect or builder was important; or 7 The site is the location of an important historic event or building. TV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing In e a y eport newspaper, and the property has been posted. Y RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation — man sl^ oT n reco®end to the City Council that they adopt a Resolution designating the Schowalter House as Historic Landmark No. 27. Respectfully submitted, rad Buller City Planner 8B:BC ko 'i -t r: a$ , -�Zfr - FIEARTI. tC WES-,.' 27 RE: LAN(OM M. .W —M February 4,1988,,.; ;f Page 4 'A4, Attachments: Exhibit - Locatfwliap Exhlbit-!Nll' t SubdfvisonKiy:`,- Exhibit Landmark,Design!"on Review Criteria I Exhiblt -000,- Photos, ofStruct ura, - 8EO:- Exhibit PhoW'6f.SchowI ter Wusc as Identified- --ln'.Thi -1M. Hlst&Y'*of'AIU,L 980 .-i Exhi b Dec-3, Commission minutes - Resolution,Recommendf4wroval tr tC CITY OF RANCHO CL:Csu HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Loma. f1E%b HLD 69-0I _ TMEl _LOCA71 OM MAP EXHIBIT A SCALE. -- 30 1 , `a ""S -.. Y° r(.S" iv%s4; 'r'. u;,: .. v. -. y - ..• . "y r "�Ei -4 fq• �Y%) 7t y` $1NU NeRt smelt ' ' 3. �� i �\ �i. 1 I•� rrl F r a. r __ vIt UWASMARUNrm C 1 T $Mute eute I ' +wa tn�$t Mrl�e �•� Tom. ' I Rt.aNl yluu uH.! ✓`�- NORM I CITY OF R'6N1! _HLD 88 -101 H" RANCHO CUCAj oWA TrrEI SUBD1VI510M MAP *f HISTORIC PRESERVATION EXHIINT- 3SCALE: COMMISSION 3� A 2.24.090 interest which justify the designation and consequent bene- fits to the public which will be derived from its preserva- tion. There shall be a description of the particular features that should be preserved, and the legal description of the landmark site or point of historic interest. B. recommend Tto historic councilathenamen�ding or may ofine a landmark or point of historic interest designation pursuant to the same procedures set forth in this chapter for original designation. " C. Review and designation of "Point of historic inter- est will follow the subsequently outlined Procedures of this ordinance pertinent to landmarks desinnation: 1. The -point of historical interest" designation is merely recognition for historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmarks designations as outlined in subsequent sections Of this chapter. 2. A current register of approved "points of his- torical interest• will be maintained for public use and information. (Ord. 70 -8 91, 1979: Ord. 70 98, 1979). wnen gnaeinq a an r • stor a preservation commission and the city council shall consider the following criteria as a guide in making its determination: A. Historical and Cultural Significance. 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representa- tive of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 2• The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 1. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or local personality. S The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. 6. The architect or builder was important. 7. The site is the location of an important historic event of building. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance. 1. The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual or signif- icant or uniquely effective. de landmark2is beautiful, orf its t s detail andimaterials arnposed beautiful or unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. CITY OF rrENt RA CFD CUC_ .Nn GA Ttn-E= 21A COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION EXHIBIT,C_SCALE. 32, y T , 4` R � t I _ 1 1 � r % and ,rnon. r-r, ,ere Clamed t e v : artd an-' vere y Inc ovt ,%ell -ur .,,el% %Ir ,,h• Niter .trod w 14=: and the •• , n• %ed artier n,•nh in Calun rata The land A.! h' %hen ne hU %er ..•ul, not keep uD na,niem. .i returned to the S,hnuallers Paul r.•"a'en h.,. marnrd Irene E%mann of I pland ,•,d he and hi, %ife and tamtl% %ith his mother and ,Hier, returned live to Southern California n N: hey did not go hack to the odd house In Alta L••ma r•ut lived in I pland on the corner of p,•,vhill Blvd and Second Avenue The% found the ao%e, to Alta Loma in terrible condition the it ", jail not been properh cared for and the cell uas ahi4Mi d•% Paul Schowaher contracted %rah Beck •nil Son, to dig a neu %oil on the property and •1ea :ree, and %Indhreak, %ere planted he sold •en a,«, n+ Louis Harms uhuse wife uas Irene ,,ho %•firer, ,rater Edna Eymann Harms and the Harm, tamd% lived to the old Schoualter house on he .orner n Hermosa and Hillside Louts Harms ,ared for the Schoualter land in Alta Loma for ,ears %hilt he vmietimes helped Harry Ledty too. the Harm, ,hildren attended the Alta Loma S,h.wd and Chalks High School and the family arended the Mennonite Church in I pland The S,houalters o %ned several groves In he 1 pland area and the% uere buss there but Pi i ,,h••,%alter% on Don helped out on the Alta .i o.rrii a at times Then came the 'biv -Celt •t , -t- Oq Schoualter gro %es In Alta -e Schowaller later the Harms house on the north •ISt _orhe• ot - termosa and Hnlsrde as it looks today CIT1' OF RANCHO C1 C-k.%fQ\�;. -k HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 3y Don Schowaller lemming to drive a tractor. The Schowaller family going for a drive. when they lived In Upland. a, Paul Schowaller to his electric car 'i Paula Pachan, Administrative Amaistant, intotm d the commission that me community services the ltsr Ranch r• Dividon has received a request tar infotmtion v concerning the histor cal /cultural significance of the sih9104milyy home lacated at the northeast " corner at !Rillsl s and Msnoes, 3e90 mrsam, t i Rancho Cucamonga- the removal of this hOUSa has been proposed subdivision !n this at at". for • possible Caolaslan Kaaba" stated that this site is huawn se the Shavelrar Ranch. the present caner is Sunshine roods. it res noted Nis prapIrty was previously a thinks, ranch. COamieslon dlecvm&d the significance and historic background of this site. Caulesloner R1111ngs stated that he does wOt feel that is site has historic value, it e N a noted that the only pesalble historic value of the IVMVdrtY vas that it "a site of the Showalter subdirULan. _ The Camismian Nambers esquaatef that this it" be discussed further at their January mstl q. The Coaaleelan rsgoested that the f011oring Stns hear for nett be placed On their January, 19SS agendas Agenda (1) Review of Ordinance 70. i (2) Prioritization of RtstarIc survey list. (3) Continued dismstion at the significance and r historic background Of the Shavalter Rowe. � dOip�@(mSl COmimlonar Arnsr adjeamed ths meting at 9:10 Ad)ourent P.M. n Respectfully Subaitt)d:: do, �CLA7lLaWt-, Res Saiderls, Cesaunity services Department ( ^ ^, NOUH CITY OF rMI: — HL B -nj RANCHO C CA,%vK �'h�ri TnU, 12/-3/97 HPC IvjM11'i c_ HISTORIC PRESERVATION EXHIBfi',_E_SCALE: COMMISSION I M: '44'a i.�-�..y ,. "..•= �;tt�::�i!�`%' =.i�z ei� 'f ^.�:`__' - , ^a `_ - - r"` .i Sw;Y'�s.'- :�i!i'4 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCASSONGa• STAFF REPORT �P C Date: November 73, 1967 To: Historic Preservation'comission From: Paula Pachon, Administrative Assistant • , Subjects Request For Information Concerning tfii� Historical /Cultural significance at -Structure Located at 5193 Hermosa, Rancho cucamonga On November 6, 1937, I received a request from the Planning Division with the C! for information concerning the historical /cultural significance of the single family home located at the northeast corner of Hillside and Hermosa (zags - Hermosa, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701). The raaoval at this house has been proposed by the developer of a possible subdivision in this'-area. Upon reviewing the file ,on this st_- ucture, the only information I could gather is that the owner of record is sunshine Foods and that the house may have bean built in the early 190018. In ad3:.tion, based upon a conversation between Haggi Stassm and myself, it was felt that this may be the Schowter Houma which was once part of a local chickan ranch. This item is being brought to the attention of the commission for their review and response to the Planning Divisions request for information regarding the historical /cultural significance Of this structure and the impact, if any, that the removal Of this struciw^a would have on the Historic Preservation Commissiones efforts to preserve our City's historical resources. 4 Attachment CO., Beverly Nisaan, Assistant planner Brad Buller, City Planner 1 34 i " x.35 rr a ., ITEM A I ��y-t�trs1� ^r;,; t;°"!'t= �..'�r� [t��.:. ���s. ,.a •;�' - ., '.- ' w.;:i .•�J: ."Cia += =:.ik RESOLUTION,MO. 88-02 a i A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF , THE CITY%OF RANCHO CUCAMIONOA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ' APPROVAL 'UF ' HISTORIC 'LANDMARK .DESIGNATION NO. 27 TO DESIGNATE `THE SCHONALTER HOUSE' ;LOCATCD AT, 5495 HcRNOSA AVENUE AS HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 27 WHEREAS,, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic Landmark Designation No. 27. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Cowission hereby makese ieMowing findings: A. The Droposed ,Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common, but is now rare. B. The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of the historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. C. The proposed Landmark is connected with someone renowned, important, or of a local personality. D. The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common, but is now rare. ,S.rCTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption y6�Tie Lf- Council for this Historic Landmark Designation, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT R°_SOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark Designation No. 27 to the City Council. APPROVED AND AI)OPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988. BY: e cen er`7Cii -man AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM 3� I a S. •'•1.6'd City, of loaf f J'utsauaga 11=91C'L1nWI OWIGRATION t(]ST011c,pol!R Dr-IRTIIIST'DESIGNATIO.1 _ a 114 % 9letorto LandauL Ilstorle point of Interest e [D1MrtliclTefWS Y' � 1. '.Caetoa Nevis. SChwalter House :y r . 9. Zlatorla Rmt, If Yapese Sao as abaw ' .1. 3treet cr'EUraa Addreasr S495 Deraesa Avenue 1 5 CSLyeltMho'Cu<droma Zlp 917C1 C,put7sKan Bernaidlim Acoassor's Parael.NO. 701 -101.4 ZOROI& y'lw Aelldontial r i Legal Descriptions por. tot 7 of Schowalter Subdivision 16. los ' e. Preeect Ower. it knows) -Sunshine rends Addreast Bug 9th Street, Rambo Cacuoroq Zips 91730 01,rabiP lot pub116 !sitar* rr S. ProNnt Ool r.51deM. Original UNt nfideML Other Put uaeat_ fast ' "'. - , DESCAIPTIOIC S. Orlefly d*aaribe the praasat h 411 *I a essay • Of the Alts or atruature and dsaerlt* May r or • 11@11411 sea elm its - Original COndIt30nI This is a raftsnat jthlfi ero a house constmet.0 In the 19104 As— the _rcllwnce 91 Mr. 1 Nn. Jacob t. Schwalter and really, no stnrtturt hts not Ja.n visibly altered and still retains 14 original Dhrel.al appearance. 7. Location Sketch mp (draw h label site and a'armuding suresta, roads, and Promloent landmarks): Au6mno-v4aG g. Approximate property sire: Lot Sirs (in tut) rrostage Depth or approt. amreagiT= 9. Coedits•,_, (cheek one) a. ExcellaAtj- b. Good_ G. Pair_ d. Deteriorated e. Ro longer in enistenee 10. le the features a. AlteredT b. Unaltered?' I 11. Surrotiodingt (cheek more the one It neeestary) A. Open land t b. Residential e. Scattered building .% d. Densely built -up_ The site Is Dart of a 5 IC. cartel' 3� approved as TT 11621. -This sutdlvtstor' will create sir half.acre tots far. single family hones, and a 79 &C. 4 remainder parcel on which Ne hlsto[Ie structure 1s totaled, dionq NtA +Gq';. other existing residential strvcture r.+w.ra !(wee at ass N Au6mno-v4aG g. Approximate property sire: Lot Sirs (in tut) rrostage Depth or approt. amreagiT= 9. Coedits•,_, (cheek one) a. ExcellaAtj- b. Good_ G. Pair_ d. Deteriorated e. Ro longer in enistenee 10. le the features a. AlteredT b. Unaltered?' I 11. Surrotiodingt (cheek more the one It neeestary) A. Open land t b. Residential e. Scattered building .% d. Densely built -up_ The site Is Dart of a 5 IC. cartel' 3� approved as TT 11621. -This sutdlvtstor' will create sir half.acre tots far. single family hones, and a 79 &C. 4 remainder parcel on which Ne hlsto[Ie structure 1s totaled, dionq NtA +Gq';. other existing residential strvcture A. irnbltacture b. ,.rte k Leisure o Economic /ladustrial d. Government e. Exploration /Settlement t Military a. Rellaloa h. Social /Education 1 12 SOurcest List books, docucenta, lY lVeya, personal 1pterVlawa, and their datest -The Nlstory or it to List. Cettlornta. 1880 -1980' by N {r(ha Galnel Stoebe(1981} 1. Date form prePared January 26, 198%y (nnae)s Bruce Cook Addresst9720 Baseline Road C1tys Rancho Cucaeonga Upt9t101 phonet 714/989.1861 _ - Ortanlzattont City of Rancho Cumna4a 34 - 17. 'threats is Sites • A. goes 4om_ b. Private development I c. SonIeg_ •?�Y d. Public forks Project_ e. Vandallam_ f. Other_ '•� 13, Dates of enclosed pbotagrarb(s) • r. a _ MMI The fclloste( (Items 14 -19) ate for armatures only. 14. Prisary exterior building materials a. Stow_ b. trick_ • o. 8taeca d.'Adobe a. Wwd_L f. Other' r gal 10. Is the Stmat"s, a. On its original site? yot - b. sieved} o. Unknown? . d. la. Year of Initial Constructions 1911 -1911 • 7V This Data 193 A. Factual b! Retimated I • �_` 17. Architect (it knew )% VIC 10. Builder (if known%, Y/t 19. Related Pastures a. Resa b. Carriap Moss J, C. outhouse d. Shad(s) e. Forsal 0ardea(s) �• f. glsdaill 9. Faterta r /tackhouse _ h. other — 1. Bess t ii-- l_ SIGNIFICANCS <' 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural Importance (include Oates, events, and Persons associated with the site when .novels The structure was the residence of Jamb Scho•,elter and fully fros about ? 1917 -1922. The Schowaltan were in tMetant fully In the early develocsent of Rancho CCcacan9a. They &"Ind In California in 1907, and about 1911 purchased 180 sues of LM tin the corner of NarmosVitiilside to what was than known as tcasnsa. A 21. Win theme of the historic resources (check only ones A. irnbltacture b. ,.rte k Leisure o Economic /ladustrial d. Government e. Exploration /Settlement t Military a. Rellaloa h. Social /Education 1 12 SOurcest List books, docucenta, lY lVeya, personal 1pterVlawa, and their datest -The Nlstory or it to List. Cettlornta. 1880 -1980' by N {r(ha Galnel Stoebe(1981} 1. Date form prePared January 26, 198%y (nnae)s Bruce Cook Addresst9720 Baseline Road C1tys Rancho Cucaeonga Upt9t101 phonet 714/989.1861 _ - Ortanlzattont City of Rancho Cumna4a 34 A -RESOLUTION NO. i O' d 1 , F• J� tip- �O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY.OF RANCHO CUZAK/NGA, -, CALIFORNIA, .-APPROVING HISTORIC.: LANDMARK DESIGNATION -NO.-27 =TD DESIGNATE "THE•SCHOWALTER MOUSE' „ LOCATED AT 5495 HERMOSA AVENUE, AS HISTORIC LMMKARK` L9SIGNATION NO. 27 _ , WHEREAS, the _Historic Preservation Cuemissi6e has held a duly advertised public hearing to 'consider all convents on,the proposed Historic ' Landmark Designation No. 27 and issued Resolution No. 28-02 rector ending to' this City Council that said Historic,Laudmark Designation be approved. C WHEREAS, The City Council has received and reviewed all input fr-= the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said Historic Landsa& Designation. SEMON 1, The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby makes_ the ' following TT—nr nos. A. Th: proposed Landmark is an example of a ty". of bulling which was once carman, but is now rare. B. The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of the histc -Ical period, type, style, region, or way of life. C. The proposed Landmark is connected with someone re nowned, important, or of , local personality. 0 The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common, but is now rare. SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption y6' —fee Cify Council for this 111storie Landmark Designation, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve Historic Landmark Designation No. 27. A - 1 , F• J� tip- �O A iw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATEt March 1968 TOt City Council and City "ger FROMs Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director L BYs Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: SUMUSiQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION: City Council declare a 1981 Jeep Cherokee, and a 1979 Chevrolet 3/4 ton truckpzvlus and authorize sale of vehicles through public auction. BACKGROUND: From time-to-timet the City must dispose of vehicles that become too costly to operate due to a high Incidence of repair. 7be4981 Jeep Cherokee, vehicle Identification number JODI8NN084086, and 1979 Chevrolet 3/4 ton truck, vehicle Identification number CCL2492186005 were scheduled for replacement during the 1986/87 fiscal year. At that time, it was decided to postpone replacement of the vehicle until It no longer seemed a reliable vehicle. It [a now requested these vehicles be declared surplus and authorize sale of the vehicles throligh public auction. Respectfully submitted, �o4ear- Jim IlArt Administrative Services Director J111ev 41 .� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Accept the Turner Avenue Street Improvements and Area VII Storm Drain, Phase I Improvement Project, north of Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe to 1001 north of Arrow Route, as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a •Notice" of Completion• and approve the final contract amount of $955,938.44 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Turner Avenue Street Improvement and Area VII Storm Drain, Phase I Improvement Project as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a •Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bend in the amount of $865,165.90 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of $95,600.00 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $95,593.84 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $442,582.95, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $955,938.44. Background /Analysis The subject proje,t has been couplet and specifications and to the satisi contract amount is $955,938.44 which additional shoring and structural sui lateral for A Future catch basin modification of drainage structure ou approach, construction of an additio chain link fence and gates for an a( 10% contingency allowed). The or 5913,680.00 and the revised amount ap Respectful(lysubmitted, \�•- — RHM:SA: w cc: Purchasing 42. accordance with the approved plans i of the City Engineer. The final ies three minor change order(s) for 'or three houses, construction of a tallation of ornamental railing, construction of an additional drive t of steps and the installation of sal $40,959.35 (which is within the amount approved by Council was by Council is $955,938.44. ;�3 RESOLUTION NO. -099 p p A RESOLUTIONV37HE CITY COUNCIL' OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FUR THE TURNER'AVLIUE!.MEET-.IMPROVEMT--AND AREA VII STORM DRAIN, PHkSE•-I.-AND•AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NO.-ICE OF COKPLETION10R�TH•WORK'. WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for The Turner Avenue Street Improvement andArea VII Storm Drain.,Phase 1, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifyihg the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council rod City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Arrow Route Reconstruction, Phase I Improvement Project, located between Turner Avenue and Archibald Avenue, to Fontana Paving, Incorporated, for the amount of $243,900.00 to be funded from the Systems Fund, account number 22- 4637 -8735 RECCOOORTION: It is recocmended that the City Council accept all bids except the -bid- submitted by Fecit Strata Construction, Incorporated, and award the contract for the Arrow Route Reconstruction, Phase I Improvement Project to the lowest responsive bidder, Fontana Paving, Incorporated, for the amount of $243,900.00 to be funded from the Systems Fund, and reject the Fecit Strata Construction, incorporated, bid as non - responsive. Background /Analysts Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 4, 1988, for the subject project. Fontana Paving, Incorporated, is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of 5243,900.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was S3a0,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements, except the bid submitted by Fecit Strata Construction. Incorporated. The bid submitted by Fecit Strata Construction was found to be incomplete in that required information was not furnished and the total bid amount could not be established. Staff submitted the bid documents to the City Attorney for review and comment. The City Attorney has concurred with staff's finding. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the oid documents. Respectfu ubmitted, G RHM: cc: Purchasing LA LA S. I �z ■ , .- ■| 2e § \ || � §■ © , ® e 2k �� ■e B� §® � B§ )| |® §� �| §� |; �f ■ �� fk | 4(p 49 | � @ .ElB - � / k �| aim § § ;§ | §% �k e �Bt| § 49 a _ r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 klutf TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H..Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer' SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the `Notice Inviting Bids• for the Slurry Seal Program, Phase I, Fiscal Year-198748 Improvement, Prolcct, located in districts, l; through 9 (see attached map) "'and to be funded from SS 300 Funds, acccunt number 15 -x637 -8050 RECON"BATION: It is recommendea that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Slurry Seal Program, Phase I, Fiscal Year 1987.88 Iapro�ament protect and approve the attached resolution 'authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids.* Background /Analysis The subject project plans and specifications have been completed and reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer, The Engineer's estimate for construction is 5128 000.00 Le al advertising is scheduled for March 7, 1988, and March 14, 1988, with Ne hid opening at 2:00 P.M., March 18, 1988. Respectfupy submitted, RHM: Attachments cc: Purchasing Lk L P i RESOLUTION NO. '9'3-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE •SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM, PHASE I, FISCAL YEAR ISa7 -88•, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Slurry Seal Program, Phase I, Fiscal Year 1967 -880. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized aid directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS• Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 18th day of March 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the •Slurry Seal Program, Phase I, Fiscal Year 1987 -884 in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, *Bid for Construction of Slurry Seal Program, Phase I, Fiscal Year 1987 -880. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California Is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,lob site. 4q RESOLUTION PAGE 2 The Contractor shall forfeit, as ppensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollare (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Im accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the Nork. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A When unemployment to the area cf coverage by the Joint apprenticeship comaittee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in tae area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at 'east 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0 When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor 1s required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contrcctors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. F So RESOLUTION PAGE 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth In Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit as a penalty to the City of Rancho - Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars (25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for ea,h calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (81 hours to violation of said Labor Code. ..-.- Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10x) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamang .gds the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest Mauer's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for %aid work shall be one hundred percent (100x) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50x) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carrics compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor wham a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 51 RESOLUTION PAGE 4 Cnntractor shall possess a Class •A• License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law - (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et, seq.),and -ules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans,, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of S35.OU, said $35.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by'-the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipul4ted above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 to`r-yer the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract w satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the Gemral Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Ranch* Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of , 19 ATTEST: Mayor --T yZle ..t i, x #s 1 i Y oAenlu try lJ Xi.• 6 V i YCVNtAIN$ • r.XU uQ /. � nv I im.(O�th1 i y S •� . nctz 66 T u 4A .r +Ire y .° E VICINITY a INDEX MAP �Y= k� r� U L <�j A TA OMA ORIVE S1k Li Y HIGHLAND 4VENUE r W W p W � 7 H W N Q GARDEN ISTREET o = o a 0 q,— W $ Q W m W 2 19 TH STREET LEGEND DISTRICT M®• 1 ® SLURRY SEAL e= �� Y NTS 7ITL _ CITOFRAKMC e. = SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM SITE MAP sy rya a 4 �z LE nl c J E C C LEGEND ff AN STREET S ERSET OR ~ DISTRICT NO.2 r Z a LTA x M A OR v i i nl c J E C C LEGEND "'" STREET I=7 SLURRY SEAL DISTRICT NO.2 ClTYOFRAKXMCLrAMCM NTS SLURRY REAL PROORAM 1987- 04 N 65 TITLE MAP e t;. J BANYAN STREET W C OR Y All � J W f W N � T � F F ¢ Z W N q V N ApRIC o AV•O � O LEMON AVE- E N D N 3 J , oy $ A E J J . O Z ORA E q Z J 0 Q Y F ¢ H Roi F W CQryoD g W °¢ m u p u ALT LOMA DRIVE HIGHLAND AVENUE LEGEND SLURRY SEAL DISTRICT NO.3 CITYOFRANCNo NTS TITLE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM 4 SITE MAP N J DISTRICT NO.4 SLURRY SEAL .�Cic`A�•�� CITYOFRA NTS TITLE SITE MAF �= SLURRY $RAIL PROGRAM 57 J 6 FA �EGENO DISTRICT NO- R L� SLURRY SEAL I CITYOFR#j4=CL PITS TITLE n c I? SLURRY SRAL PROGRAM � S1TE NAE �� !> 1987 0 88 i I I FOOTHILL BOULEVARD f- EGEND ��� SEAL DISTRICT NO- 7 f.� SLURRY SAL CITYOFRANCHO CLICMACNr � TITLE aA SLURRY 29AL PROGRAM SITE MAP; 1997 -80 loo ` Y i \y}I t GITY07RANCHO CLp *NT S SLURRY i<AI PROGRAM SITE MAP ,8 a N �V x i Q O QP Q� W CHURCH STREET r EM OCKIJSTREE LT— EGEND DISTRICT NO* 8 `J SLURRY SEAL CITYOFRANCI�IOCUCAMCO�f,A 'ITS T17LE IvflVfM SITE MAP n ui c� !> SLURRY SEAL FROGRVI ! 1987 - 88 , N r r. t- DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 2, ISBB City Council and City Manager Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer Steven Allen, Junior Civil Engineer Award and execute the Professional. Services Agreement for the contract inspection services for the Arrow Route Reconstruction,'Phase I project to NBS /Lowry, Incorporated, for the amount of 313,700.00 to be funded I'vom the Systems Fund, account number 22- 6637 -8735 RECM04ENDATION: It is recommended that City Council accept the submitted proposal, award and execute the professional services agreement for contract inspection services for the Arrow Route Reconstruction, Phase I project to NBS /Lowry. Incorporated, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 515,100.00 ($13,700.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from the Systems Fund. Background /Analysis Staff has requested, received and reviewed qualifications and proposals submitted by these consultant 'irms: NBS/Lowry $13,700.00 Don Greek b Associates 20,205.00 Staff feels that NBS /Lowry is the best suited to provide the subject services for this project, Staff has received from NBS /Lowry, Incorporated, executed Professional Services Agreements and insurance documents, reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance to the City's requirements. Respectful u ed, R cc: Purchasing 1 3 L 0 i Y' r CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: March 2, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to Award and Execute Professional Services Agreement for Appraisal Services to prepare appraisal reports for street dedication of various properties in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for various street widening projects with J. William Murphy and Associates Consulting Appraisers. RECOKEIORTIOM: Award and execute Professional Services Agreement with J. William Murphy and Associates Consulting Appraiser, for appraisal services for an amount not to exceed 525,000.00 to be pal= from various project funds. BACKWOUWO/AWALTSIS: The firm of J. William Murphy and Associates Consulting Appraisers has contracted with the City to prepare appraisal reports on various public improvement projects over the past few years. It has become expedient to consider a single contract for appraisal services an several projects rather than one for each. All work shall be performed on a not to exceed, case by case basis as appraisals become necessary. The contract amount of 225.000.00 is to be drawn from various project flrnds. Respect submitted,, RHM:dtM:pam Attachment lay �.e =syYVy _ P r. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0XGA STAFF REPORT D te• h 2 1988 '� a Marc , To: City Council and City Manager Frost: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to executa Contract Change Order No. 4''(C.O. 87- 20) for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Greek and Associates to perfom additional design reports for the Alta Loma Basins west of Haven Avenue north of HighlanA Avenue. It 1s recommended to expand their contract by $2,500.00 in bring their contract total to $19,752.00. It is hereby recommended to execute Contract Change Order No. 4 wiUii Dan -- Greek and Associates for additional design report on Alta Loma Basin west of Haven Avenue, north of Highland Avenue. BAG(GROBID/A! W.TSIS: The firm of Doi Greek and Associates was engaged to perform predesign studies for four projects, including 19th Street - all four phases, Alta Lama Assessment District, Banyan Street Bridge Extension, I- 15/Route 50. It is now found necessary to expand their contract to cover the additional workings encountered. The Change Order is for the amount of $2,500.00 to bring the Alta Loma Assessment District contract to $19,752.00 to be paid from the various project funds. Respec y su itted, RHM:{01:pam Attachment F; CITY OF WM W CUCAIONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Order o.: Alta Loam Asses�,.t District (CO 87 -20) 2 -30 -88 TO:Don Greek E Associates 2428 N. Grand Ave. Ste. L. Santa Ana CA 92701 n9 neer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. Additional design reports on the Alta Loma in Contract Price In Contract Price Basin to determine the maximum excavation of the basin and mini" Q could be released to Haven Avenue at 19th Street $2500.00 TOTAL $2500.00 JubliFICATION A need to minimm Q released from Alta Los& Basin to Haven /19th to complete the storm drain design at the intersection of 19th/Haven. The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sum of: Two Thousand Five Hundred and No /100 Dollars ($2500.00 The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Nineteen Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty two and No /100 Dollars ($19,752.00 _ The Contract period provided for completion will be (Incressed)(Decreased) (Unchanged) Work on hourly basil. This document wild become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: Ly ng near Dare Accepted: 1-7 j?*? —Eng neer ate Approved: yor, City of nc o Cucamonga ate This InforMA on will be used as recd o ng agreement dated: November 30, 1987 C.O. 820 or g na en neer Coto — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT A Date: March 2, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of an amcnJement to an Improvement Agreement with the City of Rancho.Cucsmonga and Mayne and Erma Dennfa: for the Base%Cine Road Widening Project from ArchiLald Avmua to Hellman Avenue, to clarify future street improvement requirements for Base Line Road RECDfNEIDATIBW Approval of Amendment to Section 3 of an Improvement Agreement with Y-W& and Erma Dennis to clarify the possible future improvement requirements of Base Line Road with development. i Tie subject Amendment was prepared by the City Attorney to correct Section 3 of the previously approved Improvement Agreement with Wayne and Erna Dennis. The point of concern was a statement that prohibited the City from assessing the property or otherwise requiring further dedication or lmprovemen's al ong9 Base Line Road. The Amendment clarifies that there may and will be further dedications or improverxnts along Base ;t Line Road upon development or substantial building addition to the existing residences. •� Respee e, s 6mttted, d :JLM• Attachment k r hxt_r.=,XT NEWEst Ob AND NWI, M /j}+��!� CrtY OI NAMCIIO CUCaMiM�i6A ��[�n•)j' rosrorncifor mr � e.W Dq sums oa evoera. a lm trot hart +w itA•T SSW L -_ Oli ' W p A6A6CNZNT FOR INSTALLATION Or PUBLIC ''0. IMPROVINKHT AND 0UDICATION 1t + Th1i Agreem7nt 1s made and enter -i into this loth =� arbor day of the eueamomga, a sun eiDalB torpor tleoetherelnafter referred toes `CITr) and Wayne Dennis and aTme Lae panels, buebend and wife, as Joint tenants (barainetter referral to as "OWNRR ") for the .. installation of Certain public improvastats including. but not' lttted to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sldavalke, street lights and street Psvementt along a portion of Base Lime-Rcad In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. -- -• (t) CITY has prepared piano and specifications for, end Presently eontesplatsx the installation of. public inprovements slang Sue Line Road fwm� the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks oat of Hallman Avenue to Archibald Avenue (the "sue Line - rroject` hereinafter in this Agreement) (it) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 103- 161 -09, fronting *long Base Line Road which property is w.thln the limits of the Saes Line Project and described as follower - That portion of Lot 6, Block 6, Cucamonga Homestead Association,' in the City of RancLo Cucamonga, an par Plat recorded In Book 6 of Hope, PaOs 76, San Rornardin> Count/ Records described es follows: -- Commencing at a point an the -.forth lice of Sae Line Road 165 fast Zest of the Southwest corner of Lot, 6: ' chance Worth 100.66 fat, more or less, to the South line of Roberds Court as deedcd to the County of San Bernardino by dead recorded February 13, 1P31 in Book 699, Page 185, official Records: thence Rest along the South line of said Robrds Court, 160.93 feet, more or lees to the fat line Of the Westerly 10 acres of Lots 5 and 6, Block S of said Cucamonga Homestead Aesociatior: thence South along tba Zest line of Said Westerly 30 acres, 300 8e feat, more or loss to the South line of said Lot 6: being also the North line of Bee Line Road= thence West along the North line at Bole Line -Road, 160.93 fat, more or loop to the Point of beginning„ Except therefrom the West 105.5 East of the North 130 feet thereof. Iiii) OWNCR desires to participate in the Rase Line _ Project so an to dedicate necessary Rights -of -Way related to strut frontage improvements along OWNZR•s property on Base Line Road.(6am Exhibits "A" and "B' attached hereto) ( "the Dennis Portion" hereinafter). tat). CITY '1S willing to include the Dennis "+ tOg. CITYCLERK- +t Portion within the Base Line Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows: 1. OWNER shall sign and deliver to CITY the easement deed attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference; CITY warrants that the property described within the deed is comprised of approximately 1610 square feet, the location and ccnfiguration of which is depicted within Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2 CITY is authorized to cause OWNER's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwith upon signing of thin Agreement by the parties thereto and CITY shall furnish copy of the recorded Easement Deed to the OWNER upon recordation. 3. CITY shall include the Dennis Porcion as a part of the construction of the Base Line Project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be constructed or installed thereon at CITY's sole cost and expense in accordance with CITY's plans and specifications as shown on Exhittt "A" CITY represents and warrants to OWNER that CITY will not assess, impose or levy agaimst or otherwise require of OWNER any other or further improvomeat requirement, assessment or contribution of any nature whatsoever relating to the real property described in paragraph A (i!), above, for so long as OWNER owls said real property and does not materially alter the current usq of the real property. 4 OWNER agrees to grant :o CITY, its elected officials, o:ficers, agents, employees and contractors such rights of entry and /or temporary construction ornaments an arb deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause tto completion of the Dennis Portion of the Base Line Project Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY acknowledges that OWNER maintains a garden on a portion of the OWNER's property which adjoin'i the right -of -way area described within Exhib!ta "A" and "B" and that compaction of the garden area will make continued gardening by the OWNER difficult; accordingly. CITY shall instruct its employees and contractors not to drive or park construction equipment of vehicles or o store construction materials on OWNER's remaining property during the course of CITY's installation and /or construction of the improvements described as the "Base Line Project". 5 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6 In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the t *ourt to be reasonable. 7 This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the -2- lag — I .: ..�.`yxc., F •:.; y.. �.qF'a.' y�aya�.�. - - _ d 'p' n.�i?'•- •.:..'b•'�"" 05 benefits of the partiee•hereto and to their respective heirs,' if executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the; context requires or admits. S. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties wih respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed-,this Agreement on tho day and year first above written. CITY PROPERTY OWNER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2 N L ' IA, a municipal r ora ion SY• l-7 -Do rM...u� DEN IS L. STOUT, Mayor WAVE DENNIS ERMA LEE DENNIS 28,verq1ALAU2the1detNC_ity ST: APPROVED AS TO PORN: -Clerk { ITY ATTORIIEY -3 t.�. • _ / .�i _ _ ,ter.. ..,�«. ".:+�"�i E?. fM »f)ffMfrfffMfffff MffMffffffffff #MMflfMfffff fffff lflffffffff. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAIL BERNARDINO ss On i9 •fore me Lhe uneerslgnea Notary Puolic, personal ly appeared JEFFF.-Y K Nu and ::r :nLT A. AUTNELET personally known to me to be the Mayor and City C1•.rk, respe:tively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known :- me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of sate municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SM. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNT ss Y OF SAN BERNARDINO On this the 30th da me, Sharon K. Postuma the uncerslanea Notary Puonc Notary Signature ar of December. 1987 befcre 1 j personally Known to me ( X proved to me an the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to the within inst -tmsn and acknowleged that they executes 1t. WITNESS MY HAND AND Orr S.AL. ••« arrxnusul SHARON K. POSTUMA a NOM ftUc ial,1ar11J M1nowr oft, in san e,mume o„ny My Comm, UP Mar. 24, 1989 Notary 51ghature NOTE: WHEN DO'114EI'r IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PART ACKHOILEDGEENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTNERSHIP ��— J_ - _- RSHIP, TiE A:: Y "fir`•: , r 4 I z 3� �-'- -• G 3 -� V a Now 9 ot Aa O v n 5 e tl 208- /G / -p) r 1 •, lJ S i 2 V NCw _ i _�ldeaaCK pv�i1 r 1 -' .e - Q a __ „,.' !�_ l�•f• � :A'.J -•tom .._• �`' _ -. :.. .. ^'�� %r.YM�?..y,y7 • tc' ` �, � Y]r�,^'AryMY j •203•i61 Oj '•rfa �' ., r� ;�Ls -: -`• i Its "Llni bad fobtrds . - ,r✓ eaooaeeta aaeeaers n ... 'V �0(RaasM talpOdap ` �� i3, alias aaaae�rAATO � 1 Y>~ f' W of Ratphd LU"utalp N •'� P.O. an p7' Rancho Cntamwp, CA 91730 aeAa Aatm alas sops eoa aapottpn t cp EASEMENT FOR A VALL:ABLE CONSmPJUTION. Iaelyt W *kith it hathy ask laigal. VA"t DFepIS AO JW LSE DENNIS CRANTM to shs City C Rambo Cucamonga. a M=kW Cmpoemion, an EASEMOrr tat _ AMOMY PURPOSES _ lo, oraao0 vpoo Lhdt tMa101sal JNOpa /k lbtyyotRauhoCls"mddlae Ccooef of5ee Baaatdloo,Saia of 4 xu. Dammed et Fo7a,.tt _ slat port 1pn elf tot 6. lidch B. Noeee ITS City, a 6 of Amps said City, so per plat recorded In gook 6 of Nthe rage 16, doscrdf of the 46, Records ofnt "way Recorder of sold County IYInp South of the /nllwlnp ducri6ed Iinet ;r. t.'d®tneing +t •point do the North lint of lass Lim Fwd. as sold 11" Is - sho on sold put, 165 fast East of the :outhmest comer of said Lot 67 M "" Forth 9 feet to a line parallel with and 9.00 fast North of sold North Ills and the TAUS POINT Of DSg11011NC1 thence Cast along sold parallel line 117.00 fasts thence Worth 65o felt 11.51 fast to a line parallel VIth and 17.00 feet North of &aid Worth IIns: shah" East 55.97 fast. sore or less, along said last nantloned parallel lint. to.she fast IIM of the Ves"rly lee acres of sold Lot 6 and the tasinus of said line description. Dated O W RRAL ACNNOVYLRDOYRNT ewe of _1 OnWeFy�dera Ice — "long". Jl SS Coun"i ten unbnlghed Notary hhlk ;.ptlteN:t /VDavea D pwWnW Mwnlomt _. _ _ • O plpMmme "pas bole Ol soDNKmri erleen4 jr bb m+ONeatslrndsrnNhMN `•ueacnaod loth: i3, rltNa wuunr.d,awocanowtadpN ens }• - •sieutas lL, YATNWmfhppalb glliWiw,L - M"aa�pMlVla .` Togo se A'CIpWL ACAIOpLt(CTntNT. atwl O11. PaOata ACppdMl i re This Amendment is made and entered Lnto by and between the City of kancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred as the "CITY") and Wayne Dennis and Erma Lee Dennis, husband and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNER"). A. Recitals,, (i) CITY and OWNER have entered into a written agreement entitled "Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication ", dated December 30, 1987, for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights and street pavements along a portion of Hasa Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Harainafter in this document such agreement shall be referred to as the "Agreement." (ii) OWNER owns that certain real property identified as San Bernardino County Assessor0a Parcel Ito. 202- 161 -09, fronting along Base Line Road, which property is legally described within the terms of the Agreement. (iii) CITY and OWNER now desire to amend the Agreement to reflect a modification acceptable to both parties. 1 . .. EiECONDE� AT REQUEST OF 1 .._. AM hWL TO d � CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ •- P.O. Box 807 RANCHO CUCAMOHGA,.CA 91730 AHLNDMZMT TO AaREL'HCMT FOR INSTALLATION o7 PUBLIC I1179OVMC MT An DEDICATIOR This Amendment is made and entered Lnto by and between the City of kancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred as the "CITY") and Wayne Dennis and Erma Lee Dennis, husband and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNER"). A. Recitals,, (i) CITY and OWNER have entered into a written agreement entitled "Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication ", dated December 30, 1987, for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights and street pavements along a portion of Hasa Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Harainafter in this document such agreement shall be referred to as the "Agreement." (ii) OWNER owns that certain real property identified as San Bernardino County Assessor0a Parcel Ito. 202- 161 -09, fronting along Base Line Road, which property is legally described within the terms of the Agreement. (iii) CITY and OWNER now desire to amend the Agreement to reflect a modification acceptable to both parties. 1 e. Aaraesent. NOW, TREREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows: 1. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement shall be amended to read an follows: "7. CITY shall include the Dennis portion-as a part of the construction of the Ease Line project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be constn:eted or installed thereon at CITY'S sole coat and expense in accordance with CITY'S plans and specifications as shown on Exhibit 'A.' CITY represents and warrants to OWNER that CITY will not assess, impose or levy against or otherwise require of OWNER any other or future improvement requirement, assessment or contribution of any nature whataoaver relating to the right -of -way, landscaping, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, street pavement or any other public improvement relating to that portion of Ease Line Road contiguous to the real property described in paragraph A (ii), above, so long as OWNER owns said real property and does not materially alter the current use of the real property." 2. Except as specifically amended and modified hereby, the Agreement and each and every term and provision thereof shall remain in full forco and effect. -? 2 5 v' r n r � ."'i \"4�`m ♦ 4H •'Y'S.iiH: 4 .hG t .41 A, �j M IN WYTNESS WHEREOF, CITE and OWNER have executed and entered into thAs Amendment so of the dates net forth below opposite their ■Sgnatures. Dated: , 1988 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: /- dw - :f , 1988 Dated: 1� ao -A9 , 1988 ATTEST: Beverly A. Authe et, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga S \171 \AGRMTAND \R.C. 12.6 7 q I�D a Municipal Corporation Dennis L. Stout Mayor OWNER s Wayne Dennis ,/ Wayne Donnas OWNER Erma Lee Dann 9 s +.r STATE Or CALIFORNIA .` ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) sa On , 19_, before ms the undersigned Notary Public, personally—appeared RUSSELL H. MAGUIRE personally )mown to me to be the city Engineer of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalr of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS NY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. i Notary S gnaturs S. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) r. y COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) es ,r on this the 21st day, of January, 1988 before me, ar0n os uma the undersigned Notary Publ c personally appeared WAYNE DENNXS and ERMA LEE DENNIS, ( ) personally known to me ( X ) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) are subacribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed it. WITNESS MY NAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.. a Ew�i �M TUp/A ary atUr� S \131 \110TARY \R.C. 12.6 99 .; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: March 2, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager Frog. Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Environmental Assessment Initial Study and Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Base Line Road, Phase i Rehabilitation, Widening and Storm Drain Improvements. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the Enviroreental Assessment Initial Study and issuance o a Negative Declaration for the proposed Base Line Road Phase I Rehabilitation, Widening and Storm Drain Improvements from Route 15 to 300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue. DACKGROWANALYSIS• This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Base Line Road Phase I Rehabilitation, Widening and Storm Drain Improvements project for City Council approval and issuance of a Negative Oeclaration. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached documents have been prepared to permit construction of the above - mentioned improvements. These improvements generally entail the installation of storm drain in Base Line Road from Eti wands Avenue to State Route 15. Street improvements entail the widening of Base Line Road within the limits of the existing right -of -way and as provided by dedication, full widening at Etlwanda Avenue with installation of a signal. It is the Engineering staff's finding that the proposed project is in conformance with the proposed development of Base Line Road as a major arterial street and will rot create a significant adverse impact on the environment and, therefore, recommend that these improvements be classified as a Negative Declaration. Respectf tted, J RHM:JLM• Attachment V)g 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be comp :ed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Planning Divisionis staff will prepare Upon art IIeoftthe InitialpStudytand make recommendations to Pl M1% Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three date- itnations: (1) The project will have ra significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be file!, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Lnvtronmental should Report will be plW by Ox applicant or giving additional Information Concerning the proposed project. Lite Filed: February 5. 1988 Project Title: Baseline Road Storm Drain and Stremt Improvement Applicant's Name. Address, Telephone: City Of Rancho Oucamonga 5320 Baseline Road, Suite C. P. O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, cA 9173D, 0141 9B9 -1851 Name. Address. Telephone of Person To 8e Contacted Concerning this Project: Mr. John L. Martin, Associate Civil Encinaer City of Rancho Cucamonga . game aw above. Location of Project: Baseline Road, approximately 570' vast of Etiwanda Avenue to Ivy Freeway. Asso .or's Parcel- No.- Liat other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: cit or n Rho R d onoa r f ti�3r 1 S PRWECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: widen Baseline .toad to an interim roadway' section of 66' curb to curb with 14' median providing turn pockets at existing and proposed street intersections. Conetruet atom drain system extending from Etivanda Avenue west to the proposed temporary flood control basin Located south of Baseline load and vest of the freeway corridor. Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Project area - 10.3 aces, Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information on topography, so s a y, p ants ;trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach .necessary sheets): Baseline PA, went of the project is fully improved on the north side but has only 13 fast of pavement south of centerline. Blaeldne Ad. on the east aide of the project is 104 feet vide from AC berm to AC berm. Through the project Baseline is Presently betvaen 20 and 30 foot wide. Interstate Rte. 15 crosses over Baseline at the east end. Land use on the south side of Baseline is primarily residential and agricultural. On the north side there is a nursery at the east end and a repair shop just east of Etivandal the remainder is rosidential There are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects to be significantly impacted. Is the project part of a larger project, One of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact No. M . JA; • .. .- .fir ^�y '.e 7. Estimate the a >ount of sewage and solid waste materials this project w111 generate 'ly: wig S. Estimate the nimber of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: N/A 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: Ia. If the project involves the Construction of residential units, cociplete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits prestnt the data and information required for this andtinforrmaticnipresented are true my ability, todtheabesteofamysknnwle genand belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation Uivision. can b e by the Planning ' Gate:3ns /se�il -• Signature K Enginuer r IN - n n MILL THIS PROJECT : I YES NO n = I. Create a substantial change tr ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in dxisting noise of produce vibration or glare? 'X- + 3. Create a substantial :hange in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General } Plan designations? iS. Remove any existing trees? How many? x ;F 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamables or explosives? x Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): Trees meet be removed for attract widening 7. Estimate the a >ount of sewage and solid waste materials this project w111 generate 'ly: wig S. Estimate the nimber of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: N/A 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: Ia. If the project involves the Construction of residential units, cociplete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits prestnt the data and information required for this andtinforrmaticnipresented are true my ability, todtheabesteofamysknnwle genand belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation Uivision. can b e by the Planning ' Gate:3ns /se�il -• Signature K Enginuer r IN IMP n RESTOHDTIAL CCNSTRUCTTON T: The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga i•'• Planning Division in order to aid the schaol district in astessing their P i ability to accxaodate the proposed residential development. 9evelopers are required to secure letters from the schon' district for accommodating the increased number of students pr' ^r, to issuance of building permits Mama of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: rHASE I PHASk 2 PHASE 3 PRASE 4 TOTAL 5 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: a. Earliest date of occupancy: o Model/ and I of Tentative ' S. Bedrooms Price Ranae =Yv ri v M { f arYi _4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONCA PART II - INITIAL SVDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST i ,fy'r4 Cd.� - DATES February 5. 1988 APPLICA\Z: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division ` PILING DATE: LOG NUMBER: PROJECT: Base Line Road Piduning and Storm Drain Construction " ;YV PROJECT LOCATION: B_ ase Line Road between Route 15 and Etiwanda Avenue -+ I. ENVIRON"ITYTAL IM?ACTS }; (EXPlanatlon of all "yes" and "mayhe" answers art required on attached'" cheats). ?r- YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Caoloav, Will the pruposal have +' significant results in: "5 a Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? y s` b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or [� burial of the soil? x c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervalsl x d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physienl features? _ �- x a, Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils. affecting either on or off site condicons? x f Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? x R Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground !allure, or similar hazards? x h. An Increase in the rata of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? x s 2. Mydrela>y, Will the proposal have significant W results in: 8'3 F a: 0 a. Changes in currants, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or epheeeral stream chamels? b. Changes is absorption rata*, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood v--tars? d. Change In the amount.of surface water in any body of water? a. Discharge Into surf are waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? ' 1. Alteration of groundwater charactaristics? g. Change In the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? I. Enposure of people or property to water related harards such as flooding or selchas? 3. Air OualIt'. Will the proposal have significant results Ina a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterloratlon of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional clicatic conditions, affecting air movement, eoisture or temperature? G. Bl_lta Flora. Will the proposal have significant results ine +. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Sy Page. 2 YES MAYBE NO x x x x x x x x x x x µk x X 1 I c. Introduction of new or disruptiva species of Plants into an area? d. Reduction In the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results ini a. Change in the characteristics of species. Including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result In a barrier to rho migration or movement of animals? d. Daterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? S. Pooalatimn. Hill the proposal have significant results ins a. Will the proposal alter the location, dlstrl- bution, donslty, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. SOclo— Economic Factors. WL11 the proposal have significanc results 1ms A- Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, Including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Gill project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7 Land Use and Plannlna Consideracions Will the proposal have significant results in? a A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopced plans of any governmental entities? An impact upon the qulalty or quantity of existing consuaptive or non- connumptive v recreacional opportunicies?$S Page 3- YES 4AYBE %o X X _ x x x x x _ x x x x x ,� J Page 4 ;�. YES YAY9E NO J,. 8. h&nsvorutlon. Will the proposal have significant results ins „ }-: et • a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? ;.•� b. Effects on existing strsets, or demand for x. new strut construction? '• C. Effects -on existing g Parking facilities, or -- demand for now parking? A x — -- — d. Substantial impact upon existing transport&- tins sratems? x e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- vi tion or movement of people and /or goods? _ x f. Alterations to or effects on present and +s Potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or .«•- air traffic? -X _ S' Increases In traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or Pedestrians? _ x 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results ins a. A disturbance to the Integrity of archaeological, Paleontological, and /or historical resources? _ x 30. Health. Safer, and Nuisance Factors. Will the Proposal have signtficant result, tens a Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to Potential health hazards? _ x c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances In the event of an accident? g d. An increase In the number of Individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organiscs? e. Increase in existing noise levels? _ x f Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? — _— x 9 the creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase In light or glare? x t_ s • . y4Page (�� r'3 S i• l YES Y.AYSE tt0_ 11. Aesthetfee. Will the proposal have significant r.fults 1a7 "�• s. She obstruction or degradation of say scenic vista or Mw! •" b. She creation of as aesthetically offensive % ({ site? X c. A conflict with the objective of designated = or potential scenic corridors? r y,17 1s' 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have _ a slgnlficsnc need for nw systems, or alterations to the follwingt a. Electric povar7 x Esc b. Natural or packaged Seat % { C. Comunications systems? " X i{ ' d. Water supply? — x �y+ e. Wastwater facilities? •, f. Flood control structures! _ x X g Solid waste facilities? _ YY h. Fire protection? X �• 1 Police protection? t % ]• Schools? _ _ X k. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ X 1, maintenance of public facilities, including _ roads and floor control facilities? g o. Other governmental servlc.? x a 17 Enerev and Scarce Resource.. Wi11 the proposal have _ significant results in: P Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? X b Substential increase in demand upon existing 4 _ sources of energy? x c An increase in the demand for development of t t new sources of energy? X d. An Increase or perpetuation of the consumption of u, non- renavable fours of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? X s 1m='- '�?:+' -' � '•i. }:a'.�'si]rrY °41�t`� �- ¢. K n .. � - .ey�. v.^nt Page 6 2Fa" YES MAYBE V0, iy a• Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or `.`•"'' ¢ fi, scarce natural resouiceY �Findinas �Wy 14. Mendatory of SSanlfltanca, I)sEr. �• a. Does ;the project -have the potential to degrade - eha quality of the emvirommencq substantially- ;c reduce the habitat of fish ormwtldllfe'spenies," cause,& flshI6r�vildllfe populetion•to drop k below ssif.sustaininj. levels, threiten to aliminati's plant or animal comunity, r e dues the number or restrict the ramie, of "i'rare or 'I •'ter atdangered plantlor'anlflal or- eliminate important examples of the major periods of • ' Oalifornia �hACory or prehistory? .x Ind b. Dose the project have the potentSQ to nachieve f short -tezm, to thi disadvantage of long -teem, -- a anvironmtal goals? (A shdrt -tarn ispacf en the environment is one which occurs in a relatively :•�.�..,_, R , brief, definitive ported of'time vhll& long- •• . . r _ term impacts will endure wall into the future).' x vw c• Does the project have -impacts which are individually , .limited, but cumulatively r eanelderable? (Cumulatively considerable # means that the incremental effects of an ` .,: -. individual project dra' considerable when viewed - 4�' in camnaatlon with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). X r d. Does the project have environmental effects I which will cause substantial adverse affects * on human beinas, either directly or indirectly? x II. DISCUSSION OF MMONlO;ML EVALUATION (i.e., of afflrrative answers to ' the above questions plus a discussi on of proposed mitigation measures). ' g8 Il %' Page 7 .t. III. DETER4INATI04' , On the basis of this initial evaluation: • OI find the proposed project COULD NOT have a Significant effect , en the fnvfronMe Mt. and a NEGATIVE DECLARATIO4 will be prepared: DI Lind that although the proposed project could have s•aigniticont effect on the environment, there will not bf a significant ftPatc In this case because the mitigation Measures 'ducribfd on an 13ECLWd sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION f7fLL, LE-PREPARED. ❑ I Lind the proposed project MAY have a aignifienc effaet fnvirment, and an ENVIRO4.= LYPACT REPORT a on the !s'requffset Date Pebrvary ZS 1980 ! Signature - aseociate Civil Ertaineer Ticlf g� r `5 4f ' City of 'Rancho.Cucamonga Envlornmental Checklist Part II - Initial Study Page 8 a'r r I -1 -e Installation of store drain that outlets at Route 15 mey cause an increase of erosion on the south side of Base Line Road at outlet location an energy dissipater will be installed. I -1 -f Installation of store drain may cause elimination of erosion, at several locations along the south side of Base Line Road. I -2 -b The installation of a store drain and a median island will change the historic sheet now and mky'changa other historic drainage patterns to the down stream properties and streets where outlets presently exist. Energy dissipaters, and temporarily 'llmiting inlets.,w111 mitigate outflows and possible damage to downstream properties. I -2 -e Installation of storm drain and median island will effectively cut off storm flows at Base Line and eliminate cross street flows from north to south at_iocatlons where sheet flows have been a historic pattern. I -8 -e Widening of Base Line to 4 lanes may cause a shift in circulation movements by being more attractive to the commuter and to movers of consumption goods. I -10 -e With expansion of the roadway section from 2 to 4 lanes and the possible change in circulation movements (see 1-8 -e) the possibility of increased noise levels due to possible increased traffic volumes. I -12 -f Na existing flood control facility exists between State Route 15 and Etlwand& Avenue. This project proposes installation of a master planned storm drain between these limits. /sjm 90 RESOLUTION d0. $g^ Io v ' I~r A RESOLUTIOW-0F THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.- CALIFORNIA, APPROVING .THE ENVIRONMENTAL- ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE, M OF A MEGATIVE•DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED BASE LINE ROAD PHASE .I REHABILITATION, WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ranch Cuca*o yn"a has reviewed all available input`concerning the proposed Base Line Road Phase I Rehabilitation, Wldening'and'Storm Drain Improvements; and • WHEREAS, said improvements require Environmental Asseswnt; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial study has been - i prr-urod pursuant to the California Enviromental Quality Act,• as amended. t- NON,- THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED; that the City Council of the Ciy of Rancho Cucamonga'does hereby resolve as follows: hereby approves —t e�nvTrormental Ass Council of Assessment Inital,Studyfand issuance�ofga Negative Declaration for the proposed Base Line Road Phase I Rehabilitation, Widening and Storm Drain Improvements project. SECTION 2. The Determination pursuan the California lo EnvironmentalQuaallitytAct, Notice of _ 9l = r Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SR:ns 7j I jtl -114 4, UA -N- 41 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 4 ri C DATE: 2. 19881 .March I I ' r TO: r and "ers of the City'council W7 k 'd a FR tid,B 'C"Iti"Planner OCT: Susan BY: C Susan Ramirez Code Enforcement officer • SU RELEASE OF-CASH 0 . EPOSITS RECOMMENDATION: Work •for, the.-following tracts has- been completed and cash de T!s are hereby ;recommended by the Planning Division -to be released AMOUNT OF, DEPOSIT PURPOSE PANNOW DESIGN A DEVELOPMENT $2.500.00 4401 'Now Sales Office Tract 1292410&rossa Place 500.00 Monument Si 94 Permit Tract 12924/Barossa Place CITATION BUILDERS $2,600.00 Model Home Sales'Office Tract 12238 $ 628.00 Subdivision Ident. Sign Tract 12830 Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SR:ns .i { — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT`' DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Quitclaiming of Lot 8, Tract No. 12942, located within the Caryn Planned Community to Kaufman and Broad Land Company RECOM 00kTION. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution " ordering quitclaiming of the the subject City property to Kaufman and Broad Of the City, and authorizing the CityeClerketo Quitclaim theePassssagehand adoption of this resolution and to cause a certified copy of same to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the time of recordation of Tract No. 12942, located within the Caryn Planned Community, Lot 8 was dedicated to the City in fee simple. The dedication was made to the City with the intention of its future abandonment by the City to provide access to Pinnacle Peak Court to benefit Lots 9 and 10 of Tentative Tract Mo. 13563, all in compliance with the master plan of the Caryn Planned Community. When of TractcNo. 13563. Public loaccessllfrom incorporated inacle Peakn final ma the Pedestrian green way within Tract No. 13563 will be provided on the final map of said tract. Resp submitted, RHH. Attachments 93 . i. ` x CITY OF PMOID CUCkMo%GA ' OF of RADft Cwwxmp go Meed AA WPAfnd Mor the 1A,, of the St,t@ if Fftf*lowlrs fatttte daug-d "W MP9M IS lbw OW Q(Ramcho Cmmp. C,,my ` x CITY OF PMOID CUCkMo%GA ' 4 r rf i 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being a portion of Lot "B" Tract 12842 recorded in -Map Book 187, Pages 62 through 88 Records of San Bernardino County and more Particularly described an follows: Parcel 1 Beginning at the Southoast corner of said Lot B; thence North 69.44'34" West along the southerly line of said Lut "B", 9.27 feet to a point on the Right -of -Way line of Pinnacle "Poak Court, said point also being the beginning of a non - tangent chive concave to he Northwest having a radius of 47.00 foot and radial_ bearing of North 69 °44'34' West; thence northerly along aaid-__ curve and Right -of -War line 22.74 foot through a central angle of 27.43'12" to a point having a radial bearing of North 87' 27'48" West; thence South 87.27'46" East, 1 66 fact to a point in the easterly line of said Lot "B ", thence South 00.00'66" East, 28.20 feet along said easterly line of Lot B" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 4+ Containing 102 4 square feet more or lees Parcel 2 Y Beginning at the Northoae* Corner of Said Lot "B "; thence South �- 00.00'56" East along the easterly line of said Lot "B ", 46.88 .. feet; thence South 70'32'43" West, 2 58 feet to a paint on the Right -of -Nay line of Pinnacle Peak Court, acid point also being the beginning of a non - tangent curve concave to the southwest having a radius point of 47 00 feet and a radial bearing South 76.32'43" Went; thence northerly along said curve and Right -of- Way line 31 15 fact through a central angle of 3746611$ to a point having a radial bearing of South 40'34'30" West, thence North 40'34'30" East, 27 69 feet to the POINT OF HEMMING. Containing 407 3 square feet more or leas ®` �s E%hlblt 'W' - r I'll e 1 R !---- ----- ----" s pmma0 w ipp i � w al .;'fils � � - _ v e Y' ~ u�la �I z a A .z �rA n H o " J pmma0 w ipp i � w al .;'fils � � - _ v e Y' ~ u�la �I z a A .z �rA I 1> y `y RESMUTIDM N0, gg— 1O•�, A RESOLUTION OF THF.CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU 1141A CALIFORMIA,.COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO DE'QUITCLAIHED LOT,B, TRACT NO. 12942 = WHEREAS, Lot B of Tract No. 12942, as per map recorded in Cook 1187, pages 62 through 66, Inclusive, of the office of County Recorder of San Bernardino County, was dedicated to the City to fee simple for landscape purposes; and WHEREAS, in order to provide attest to the public streets for the - benefit of Lots 9 and 10 within Tentative Tract No. 13563, located within the Caryn Planned Conmunity, said Lot B t: to be qultelaimxed; and WHEREAS, said quitclaimed Lot 8 is to be incorporated in the final map of Tract No. 13563, being subdivided by Kaufmzn and Broad Land Company. a California Corporation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds, from all the evidence subirl tted,__t'RT_L_oF 8 of Tract No. 12942 iv unnecessary for present or future landscape purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order quitclaiming said Lot B, which has been further described in a legal description and a map which are attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and "B8, and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2: The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Corporation quitclaim re—eo on ehalf of the City to seise, release and quitclaim said lot as specified above to Caufman and Broad Land Company, a California Corporation. SECTION 3• The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution—lo -6e recorded in the office of the County Recordei of San Bernardino County, California. I .t11•t.glb SECTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage aad adoption of this reso u on, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. Cl? t�. ♦ ,Y ,, e 1I 4 .f — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto 'ITJ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECO94ENDATION: The required street improvements for DR 86 -07 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful ft formanee 06 -M— in the amount of $60,000 (utility undergrounding). Background /Analysis OR 86 -07 - located on the northeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue DEVELOPER: Arical Properties 2900 Bristol Street, Bldg. D, Suits 104 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $60,000 (utility undergrounding) R RIIM Attachment at 19 9 i o RESOLUTION 6. '9?— 10 3 a A RESOLUTION OF THE,CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEM1.0 -THE PUBLIC 111PROYEMENTS ' FOR OR 86 -07 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COKPLMION FOR`THE WORK •1, WHEREAS, the construction of-public improvements for DR 86 -07 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City.Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice,.of txpletton is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder cf San Bernardino County. iM M -- — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA im STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvecent Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 87 -31, located on the west tide of Lucas Ranch Road, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Turner /Lreas Rancb Road Partners RECOMMEROATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND OR 87 -31, located on the the west side of ,.ucas Ranch Road, north of Fourth Street, in the Industrial Area Specific Plan Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on September 23, 1987. The Developer, Turner /Lucas Ranch Road Partners, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $192,000 Labor and Material Bond: S 96,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Respect 1 //pbmitted, RHM:LB:sd Attachments '. e 0 fa: • 4' • n'']i'n , ( r'0)A a RESOLUTION $$- 10 y •- No. �b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF RANCHO ` CUrAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY•FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -31 :y WHEREAS, the City Council of the.Ctty of,Rancho Cucamonga, - California, has for its consideration an- Improvemient Agreement'-executed on �- February 12, 1988, by Turner/Lucas Ranch'Road Partners as developer,ifor the Improvement of public right -of -way adjacent-to the real property specifically described therein, and generally'located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of Fourth Street; and.' WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described to said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done,dn conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 87 -31; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by —�-•- ` good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said , Improvement Agreement. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonna, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 0 fa: • 4' • n'']i'n , ( r'0)A a ■ �n. �i f —I I I !�Mr CITY OF RANCHO CU'CAMONGA ENGINEEMN(7, DIVISION I o .+- 4 i rrmi: DR 87 -31 N TML. E7®BM. <, W1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �J ^- STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Elm Avenue, from Church Street northeasterly to Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Hanes of California, as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community RECOIMDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached res2lution. accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. AMALYSIS /BACKGROUND Lewis Homes of California, the developer of Terra Vista Planned Community, Is constructing Elm Avenue, from Church Street northeasterly to Spruce Avenue, prior to developing the adjacent property. The Developer is su:W tting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site imp- ovements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 583,600 Labor and Material Band: $26,800 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfu submitted, r RHM:LB:sd Attachments 103 1 , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL uF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. tALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ELM AVENUE WHEREAS, the City - Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration in improvement Agreement executed on February 10, 1988, by Lewis Homes of California a-s developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way generally located on Elm Avenue from Church Street northeasterly to Spruce'Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and - subject to the terms thereof, is to be done prior to development of adjacent real property; and WHEREAS, said Imprcvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of•the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is; hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement•on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. • .t I W � t•— wrv...�T..�� e v G c 'a7 Op X J* 10-6 J 3 M zo 6 O IU1 U •6 R R 0 N t0 � S i .�• W S • 8R ,lea -\ � � 6 u �\ '. l •1 J S _ 1 \� 1 F y 1. J* 10-6 J 3 M zo O IU1 U •6 5 ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire,. City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliiand, Public Works Inspectot:s�— SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 84 -12, locatr•j on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and- Eliwanda Avenue, submitted by Patscheck - Hackbarth RECOMME01TIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached res ution,- accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security tx, guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DR 84 -12 were approved by tM City Council on January 22, 1987, in the following amounts. raithful Performance Bond: $430,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $215,000.00 The developer, Patscheck - Hathbarth, is re questing approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. P.espec iry submitted, v � C :SMG:s Attachments I `•A _ 1+R A kill -,",�-"iESOLUTiON NO: $ 10 A RESOLLIT19M OF-7K'CITYCOU*CIL'10FJHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA,-APPADVING IMPADYEMEUT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IWAOVEWNTiSECURITY FOR DR 84-12 WHEREAS.�the Cfty'4urcilof the City of. Rancho Cucai6nga. California, has for itt-coAsIderation.an l2provement4greemenfExterfilon" excruted on March 2 .1588 'by Patscheik - Rackbarth.-as developer', for the foprovement,of pubIWrI;AtZf:,qf adjacent to the realeproperty, specifically described therein; and generally ocated the northeast -curner'of Arrow Highway and Etivanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of.such Improvements. described In said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the-,develop!wnt of said DR 84-12; and MIEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and ;d- accoapanfed by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is I de6t ff in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement'Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the saw are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. -'ion 11 . r 0 c i, ,r "! r` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA •. STAFF REPORT t+rf DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, -Public Works InspectoC -- Vl� SUBJECT: Approval 'of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10035, located on the southeast corner of fed Hill Country Club Drive and Calle Corazon, submitted by Rancho Associates RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attachad resolution, - accepting the subject agreement extension and security and witNMrizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. AMALYSIS/BA:KGROUIiD Improvemeent Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 10035 were approved by the City Council on March 21, 1985, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $244,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $122,000.00 The developer, Rancho Associates, is requ_sting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement i reement Extension are available In the City Clerk's Office. Respec f m tted, RHM:SMG:sj Attachments ■ a r 1 is ,RESOLUTIOH No. Cl $ — 10 r7 A RESOLUTIdM OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIIYA AND INPROYEMEWT'SECURITY FOR TRACT 10035 YHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension 4 erecuted on March 2, 1988, by Rancho Assoeiates�as developer; for the Improvement of public right=of -way adjacent to the real.property specifically described therein, and; generally located at the - southeast corner of Red Hill Country Club Drive end Calle Corezon; and a WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement A reewnt and subject to the terms_thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the develo;mnt of said Tract 10035; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and,..__,_. accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified - in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THERL. -ORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvecent Security -be and the sane are hereby approved and the Hayor is hereby authorized to sign sold Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cuamongs, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. - CI a Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAA STAFF REPORT ��° a DATE: March 2, 1988 C �1 TO: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and improvement Security for Parcel Map 9192 located in The Caryn Planned Community, submitted by Marlborough Development Company . CEC011ENDATI0N It is recommended U.at the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9192, accepting the subject agreement and security-and authirizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said a ^reement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Parcel Map 9192 located between Banyan Street and Highland Avenue and between Rochester and Milliken Avenues, in the the Caryn Planned Cwmmmity Development District, was approved by thz Planning Commission on May 22, 1985, for the division of 103 acres into 4 parcels. The Developer, Marlborough Development Company is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements In the following amounts: Faithful Performance Street Improvement /Dehris Basin Street Orain/Manholes Landscape/Underground Utilities Block V.alls $1.019,356 674,482 1,443,607 534,555 Labor and Material $509,678 337,241 721,804 267,278 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. Re _ bml4ted, w �D Attachments 110 r RESOLUTION 110. $g' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAW..GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP�KWER 9192, (TENTATIVE, PARCEL MAP NO. 9192), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Hap No. 9192, submitted by Marlborough Development CCoo��any, and "consisting of 4 parcels, located betY.een Banyan Street and Highland Avenue and"between Rochester and Milliken Avenues, was" a ri proved by the Planning COMfaslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Cucanga on May 22, 1965; and _ WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 9192 is the final map of the division of land approved as shorn on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final map by the City Council of said City have now been Yet by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improve int Sxurlty by" Marlborough Development Company as developer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk -to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 9192 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present saw to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ;3 w'S � ✓ � I' ,r ia��4. WANS"MW Pt s 7w s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988; TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJLCT: Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreements and Ivprovement Security for Tracts 13557, 13559 and 13562, located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, north and south of Vintage Drive, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad RECD MODATION ..,� .. It is recmumended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tracts 13557, 13559 and 13562, accepting the subiect agreements and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said maps to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tracts 13557, 13559 and .3562, located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, north and south of Vintage Drive, in the Caryn Planned Coanunity, were approved by the Planning Commission on February 20, 1985, as follows: Acres Lots Tract 13657 7.62 30 Tract 13559 15.92 74 Tract 13562 1•: 14 63 Marborough Development Corporation is submitting agreements and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Tract Faith /Perform Labor /Material No. Bond Bond 13557 $100,500 550,250 13562 165,000 82,500 13559 196,000 98,000 113 aae r K L tf, �•�yY CCSR ;. MARCH 2, 1988- -31 PAGE 2 - Copies of the. agreements and:_security are available in the City Clerk'i a Office. - - - Letters of approval have been received from the'high school and elementary - school districts and Cucamonga County Vater District. Respe -,,submitted, % RHM:LB: , ±t Attachments -- ' d w s N i RESOLW IOM NO. $— 9 ez� A RESOLUTION OFj�THE 'CITY COUMCIL OF THE CITY.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.- CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS IMPROVEMENT SEC11RITY, AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT MOS. -1355% 13559,AMD 13562,, -K - r , WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No.,13557,.c6nsisting of 30 lots, Tentative Mcp of Tract 13562, consisting of 63 lotf?subaitted by Kaufman and Broad, Subdivider, and Tentctive,Map.of Tract 13S59;-.consisting of'- Wlots, submitted by Marborough Development Corporation, Subdivider, located on the west side of Rochaster Avenue,xnorth.and south of Vintage Drive, have been submitted to the City of Rancho.- Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in tha Subdivision Map Act -of the •State of'California, and to corpliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and - r, WHEREAS, to meet tha'reequireaents established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Maps of ;said Tracts„ Marlborough Development Corporation has offered the Improvement Agreements submitted herewith.for approval and - execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Maps offering for dedication for public use the Streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreements be and the same are approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute saw on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That taie Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Maps delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. I{5 - r . «�„ } . Ir I= 0 RECOM EAMTIOM: It is reconaended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing Project, and authorize the Administrative tingecy). to be funded from Federal Sectliol 203(Fund,an5d thepSystems Fund. BACKGROUND /AHALYSIS on February 17, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Riverside Construction Company, incorporated. Staff has r--ceived from Riverside Construction Company, Incorporated executed contract documents, bonds and Insurance documents. them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respectf 1 u tted_, I RHM: c�: Purchasing )II — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORTI t DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager iy FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer a,. BY: Steven Allen, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT. Excute contract r the Imprar ssingProlec located o CrtAv ' Railroad north of Base Line Road,,awarded to Riverside Construction Company, Incorporated for the amount of $112,456.00 to. be 4 I funded from FeAeral Section 203 Fund, account number 17- 4637 -8777, and the Systems Fund, account number 22- 4637 -8750 Ir I= 0 RECOM EAMTIOM: It is reconaended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing Project, and authorize the Administrative tingecy). to be funded from Federal Sectliol 203(Fund,an5d thepSystems Fund. BACKGROUND /AHALYSIS on February 17, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Riverside Construction Company, incorporated. Staff has r--ceived from Riverside Construction Company, Incorporated executed contract documents, bonds and Insurance documents. them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respectf 1 u tted_, I RHM: c�: Purchasing )II i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMEMDATIOK - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA{ V k. STAFF REPORT March 2, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide Approval to Annex OR 87 -31, located north of 4th Street and west of Lucas Ranch Road, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 16 and setting the date of public hearing for April 6, 1988 It Is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutitns approving the Engineer': Report for Annexation. No. 16 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described project to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Analysis /Rackground Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex DR 87 -31, located north of 4th Street and west of Lucas Ranch Road, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 fo- Annexation No. 16 and setting the public hearing date for April 6, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subject annexation is on file in the Engineering Division, Respectfu bmltted, RHM: Attachments Wa s e RESOLUTION NO. 433— 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 16 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRiCT.NO. 3 WHEREAS, on March 2, 1982, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required,by the Landscaping-and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should-be modified to ajy respect. NOW, THEREFORE DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses T'iaid park and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desEFTE07n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of lane In sa ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for— i.�poses of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 119 .. az { .z �s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 16 for OR 87 -31 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Miyhways Code, Statq of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act or 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District me. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ' SECTION 3. Plans and SEeLifications is The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval t' for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and t >, specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be Incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and orlby the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenanre costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be bassi on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been deaarcatid into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 paroils, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October S. 1993, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain withii the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenince costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. 17.0 .j' Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands an Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer- Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 16 is as follows. Zone 1 Total estimated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Assessment units, acres Total cost • assessment Existing District $2,070 $270 - 5258.75 /year or 521.56 /mo. /iot Existing Annexation New District No. 16 Total 0 0 0 380,594 7.31 380,601 unit for year and month MHO -60� - $ 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre Assessment shall apply to exch tot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled •Exhibit A% by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. t -%% 1 IA4-1 SECTION 6. Asse-,sment- Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone I and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or panel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June; to determine' - ihe actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which ari�to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act 'of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Counct, adapts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex tc District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and' determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year In June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 1 3�1 ?z I = 1, W - I EXHIBIT "A" - - _ •S Properties and improvements to he included within Annexation No. 16 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3-. 2 PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE ° OR 87 -31 (lot 7 of TR 7936'1 5.38 (pct 1 of PM 6596) 1_93 7.31 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION No. 1 Haven Avenue Foothill Boulevard Milliken Avenue 4th Street Rochester Avenue 6th Street Area rq—�Ft. 0 0 0 0 0 0 C'o-"�ulr a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE A NEXA7 ON NO. STRICT N0. 3 F' J 1 1 1 OF RANCHO ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. S $ - III A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMEN'r DISTRICT: UESIGNATIHO SAID ANNEXATION AS 3;PURSUAANNTNo. TO THETLANDSCAPING ANDNLTIGGHrING ACT DISTRICT 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division is of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of 1brk: That the public interest and convent entt rquT-e and ff 15 f the intention of this City Council to form q _ maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and facilittes thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operaticn includes the cost and supervision of any sprin;'tr system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. F!CTiON 2. Locaticn of Work: The foregoing described work is to be lorated within roadway r—ig t�-ai• -ray and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 16 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3% SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contempla e wd- ocr, in-TWopinion of said y CddffdT, is of more than local or ordinary •ablic benefit, and the said City Council hereby mekes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district 1s assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain •Map of Annexation No. 16 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3• heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by R-solutlon No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. I.15 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Report of En loser: The City Council of said City by Resolution Wo— {Fas epprove t repo rc of the engineer of work which report Indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 16, Landscape Maintenance District No. 30 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report 1s hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Cnilaction of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same ae an n e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin ; Notice is hereby given that on April 1, I98H� at a wur o . . n ha City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having,_ my objections to the wnrk or extent of the assessment district, may appear and shop cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed to accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca tr, and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propo�s si�ia113e� one an carr ea roug in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication V Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma-& —pursuant to Section 61961 off-EFFUR—er—m—e-nrTode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation published In the City of on ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1 ;L�O — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbiONGA STAFF REPORT r DATE: March 2, 1988 , T0: city Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aida SUBJECT: tApproval andscape Maintenance oDistrict�No35 6 as Annexation No 2 and setting the date of public hearing for April 6, 1988 RECDMQIDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation Po. 2 and setting the, tAte of described lbed tr cts to Landscape Maintenance District Mot 6,arnex theove Anal sis /Background Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution declaring the City's Intent to annex Tract Nos. 13557, 13562 and 13559 (Caryn) to Land:cape Maintennce hearinga date 0for rApril o6, 1988. Annexation attached foand oun 111 consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Rnpurt for annexation. the subject letter subject annexation ison file inthe Engin developer eeringDivisi requesting the Division. Respec y s mi ted, :sd Attachments J r - , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, on March 2. 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucmmnga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk-of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should tie " modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o_i saTcr-w-ork and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained to said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descrflie 7h said report, the boundaries o1 the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in safd- sessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained to said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for Tye purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the Proposed district. a� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 2 for Tract nos. 13557, 13562 and 13559 (Caryn) SECTION 1. Authority for Report u. ., This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California ty (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). �y SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to rave:: all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 6. The City Ccuncil has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 13557, 13562 and 13559 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the ` i' recorded Map as roodwpy right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications t The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the t assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specificatioas were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 Including Annexation No. 2 is as follows: Existing Annea New District No. 2 Total Landscape Area 771,110 118,095 889,205 No, of D. U. 729 167 896 1'1q Per Lot Annual Assessment 889.205 X .38 $2 $24.81 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collt:tor streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. o-. SECTION 5, Assessment Diagram a a A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is tttached to this report -and w labeleo *Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated w within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to"411 lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the C number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during tle previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1 City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to nistrict and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4 Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year In June, the City Council conducts a public hearin3 and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. .e - m 4 °xy R.. •_�P's,J'"gw';'.Se� -x,.._ _ .: - � :•;t_ „1:��' -'�:i lei: EXHIBIT 'A' Properties and lmproreaeits to be included within Annexation No. 2 to ,a Landscape Maintenance District No. 6: MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D U 3iRLET - sq. 13557 30 Perimeter 7,906 27,129 r 13559 74 and Loop 1,382 29,432 13562 63 Streets °2,932 49.314 167 12,220 105,875 9 ■ r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (c ANNEXATION NO.2 5 Z, p u a; K r, F ao 26 Jy /� It i ,• �• n u ,• ,a u • � • 7 , 7 • i - TUB GROUND COVER TURFlEA GROUND COVER 7,908 S.F. 27,179 S.F. ;IDVMAlK �Fd 9,070 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA 36-5 Ic L ENGINEERING DIVISION t{, =",.1% VICINITY MAP N nn l' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION NO.2 = TURF ® GROUND COVER IF &M 1,382 S.F. ,SIDEWALK AREA 19,701 S.F. r tp ` �'I& CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,%v(OVCA A it b2w �B ENGINEERING DIVISION C ,� +ntD c VICINITY MAP N T ` A. a u 1 i2 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. !o ANNEXATION NO. Q M TURF 10 GROUND COVER SIDEWALK MM 1!,510 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANK ENGINEERING DIVISION b"tn6 VICINITY MAP GROUND COYER AM Qtn4 S.F. N r e RESOLUTION NO. '33- 1)3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BS IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, ds follows: SECTION 1. Descri "on of Work: That the public interest and ,,nvenience require an s e n ention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation Includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, a'A walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work; The foregoing described work is to be located wTfgn roadway r g -o -way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file In the office of the City Clerk, entitled °Annexation No. 2 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6•. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contempla a wor , in —ire opinion Or Salo L.11Y LgUnV,11. 13 of more than local cr ordinary public benefit, ano the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work cha•geable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 2 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file to the office of the City Clerk if said City. 135 r, ,I RESILUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Report Of Engneeerr: The City Council of said City by Resolution HO-7r as approval the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 2, Landscape Maintenance District No. 6. 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a -same time and In t9e same manner as County taxes are collected. Tha City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a bearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on April 377989.—At TWnour of in e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, slay appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writin and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Li&%Ing Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all be done and carried — tnroug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 0. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan o ec on o e overnmen ode. The Hayor shall sign. this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the sans, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The 0x11 Re of a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. N(: RESOLUTION n0. T3- !lei A RESOLUTI^i GF 'HE C.TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIgHGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATIOU N0. 39 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on Merch 2, 1988, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed tF ^ity Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report t,, writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; aid WHEREAS, the City Engineer lies made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writiaj as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report aid each and every part therrof, and finds that each and every part of said repport is sufflcient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should-be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESCUED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itacized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them ara hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc—r7B-eTTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said- s�sment District to proportion to the estimated heneflt to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved avid confirmed SECTION 4: That said repot shall stand as the City Engineer's Reprrt fouPposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. +:4 CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 39 for Tracts 13557, 13559, 13562 and DR 87 -31 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the +treet lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly" abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street iightIng improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. {39 a s�. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based an available data, it is estimated that maintenance cnsts for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land fr. industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-is' shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Ener4v Cost: ^Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor No, of Total Lamps Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTO No. 39 Total 5800L 444 0 444 9500L 485 0 485 16,0001. 16 0 16 22.0001. 4 0 4 27 5001. 6 0 6 ^Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate No's Maint. Cost SBOOL 444 X f 8.93 X 12 f 47,579.04 95ML 485 X $10.16 X 12 59,131.20 16,0001. 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,000L 4 X $13.84 X 12 664.32 27,500 6 X $15.31 X 12 2.939.52 Total Annual Maint. Cost $112,633.44 2. Total Assessment Units: Y70 Assess Units before this annexation • 16,063 Assessment Unita this annex per page 4 • 182 Total Assessment Units 16,245 1 Lid) -- w i 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 5112 633.44 36.91 /year /unit No, o Units n str c —161 3— `. Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram '�"• ;opies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this `Street report and labeled Lighting Maintenance District No. 1=, Annexation No. 39. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment r: Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per_, net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events u 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City >' Engineer's Report. a S 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. .p ro iy► 'fw.l .Jj `.Y� � �, lies - '.' iw.'. G."" 'rV.I��/yrK'^., #- i,.i•?."i:MJi �1K `- _ • Y� EXHIBIT "A " c J Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. ti 39 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. No. of Lam s to be Annexed f Project Acreage n—ti- _ _ �_ !one 1 TR 13557 --- 30 --- --- --- - -- --- TR 13559 --- 74 --- --- --- --- - -- TR 13562 - -- 63 - -- - -- ___ .__ . -- Total - -- 167 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Zone 2 �r OR 87 -31 lot 7 of TR 7936 5.38 11 Pcl 1 of PH 6596 1.53 4 Total 7.31 15 -Iq :i �s- x 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 39 = TURF ® GROUND COYER LURE LE& 9,070 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 27,129 S.F. N Lti Al r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. -1 ANNEXATION N0. 39 JU TURF in GROUND COYER TURF AM 4,0.3'1 S.F. SIDEWALK &9m 1a,5W S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 40,314 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A ,. STATE OF CALIPORM �J ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. -1 ANNEXATION NO. 39 a TURI ® GROUND COVER TURF AREA 1,382 S.F. SIDEWALK AREA 13,701 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L COUNTY OF SAN MNAUn;O z; 3 STATE OF CALMRMA G. UVD COVER AREA 29,432 S.F. N ■ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. -1 AWrE.UTICii iii. 39 .r.: IlI: SITG C-) N IM . •OK 0 -1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R 19-1-3 COUNTY OF BAN URNARDINO 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - �m I • W p:yN LYL' SITG C-) N IM . •OK 0 -1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R 19-1-3 COUNTY OF BAN URNARDINO 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - �m RESOLUTION NO. '313 - 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION 80. 39 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrl Lion of Mark: That the public interest and convenience— reFe an s e n en ton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proprsed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wTfKTn roadway r g -o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 39 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Ra. 10. SECTION 3. Descrl Lion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor , in a op I nion of sale uIry Z;5un-c is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, whin: said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundar- tines shown upon that certain •Hap of Annexatiun No. 39 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 31). 1" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. crCTION 4. Report Of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approves a eport of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 7. Landsca in and L1 httn Act of 1972: All the work herein propos3 shall a one an Carr a roug in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and L%hting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan to 5ection 61961 of e verrmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Da/1 Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. '-iiL' RESOLUTION� =.t'% PAGE 2 'x+ SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected ut the sime @5 an n e same manner as County taxes are" collWc . The'City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon' said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on April b; ID$�at our o po ne City Connell Chmabcrs at 9161 Base Line, in the City d' Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the wo• ►-xtent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said w, hould not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be _ considered, If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equal zed assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and L1 httn Act of 1972: All the work herein propos3 shall a one an Carr a roug in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and L%hting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan to 5ection 61961 of e verrmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Da/1 Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. '-iiL' DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT- March 2, 1988 �y City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide Street and west of LucanRanch Road• to Streetr h Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 12 and setting the date of public hearing for April 6, 1988 RECOMMENDATION It is recosendaf that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 12 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's iatention to annex the above described project to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. /ealvsis/Background Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex OR 87 -31, located north of 4th Street and west of Lucas Ranch Road, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 12 and setting the public hearing date for April 6, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subject annexation is on file in the Engineering Division. Resp ly ubmitted, Attachments 1y9 z , <1u .- _ RESOLUTION NO. $ $ Ilia A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R4NCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, on March 2, 19K, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of t said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should °be' modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o s-T aid work and of the incidental expenses to connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. F, SECTION 2: That the dingram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc1B—ed"Tn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land 2� within said Assessment District -ire hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved ono confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for purooses of alt subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. `yam Y ISO " P tik .A "r ti K �J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 12 for OR 87 -31 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highwls Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developxnts in Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly ahutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on rca,jor streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Immrovement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans ano specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenanc, activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. r�i' -:+. :�V'• f:.". ('.Y,f yIFgj. i-0'3' t SECTION 4. Estimated -Costs r No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement 01, construction. All improvements will be constructed by developer's. Based 11 on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessnent Z' purposes will be i indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. h Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is comprised of street • light improvements on local streets for all industrial, commercial and 'IN institutional protects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. e� The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 4 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: a No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp 3 Lamp Size* YTD No. 12 Total 5800E 44 3 47 9500L 2 0 2 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost t 5800L 47 X s 8.93 X 12 $5,036.52 9500L 2 X $10.16 X 12 • 243.84 Total Annual Maint. Cost aC,280.36 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 393 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 15 Total Assessment Units 408 ism • can a, "^ - 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - IS, &3-6 ' - f12.94 /year /unit No. o n � n �E�%T- - Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained ila Section 6. .�`• SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this f "e report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 64, CT+ Annexation No. 12. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. K, SECTION 6. Assessment y, Improvements for the District are found to be of general ben.,fit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment mill be 2 units per net acre. y. SEfil0fl 7. Order cf Eye�ts I City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. ,j 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to amwx a District and r sets public hearing date. — City Courcil conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and r rmines to fo +n a District or abandon the proceedings. 4 Every year in May, the City Cngineer files a report with the City Council. 5 Every year in June, the City Lounctl, conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and opprovc5 u.e individual assessments. IS3 EXHIW •A• Properties and improvements to be Included within Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: . pcl 1 of , PM 6596 1.94 4 y' Total 7.31 15 3 - -- - -- - -- +4y P% 1� :i a 3.- 7 r �'. r j57 tr tea_ ^T- J� ',�I Assess. ho. of L s to be Annexed Pro ect Acreage —Unit— _ DR 87 -31 lot 7 of TR 7936 5.38 11 - -- - -- - -- - -- . pcl 1 of , PM 6596 1.94 4 y' Total 7.31 15 3 - -- - -- - -- +4y P% 1� :i a 3.- 7 r �'. r j57 tr tea_ ^T- J� ',�I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXAT?W NO. ! ?_ J v .MC Ip JOK �J•l• JL - SITE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1� STATE OF CALIFORNIA — N IF •'� ' • � � J1JK /A •. , ■aJ.R . I .e. • • � ,�� f ' 1 • Itl•< YI a W JN.kIr �■.0 LA 4 JN■ SITE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1� STATE OF CALIFORNIA — N IF RESOLUTION NO. '6?'—)17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA rACLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSKAT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 16 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Des�crlp"on of Work: That the public interest and convenience regu rre and is the — intenflon. of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection witn said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work 1s to be loLated wTt�dway g�oT-wen y umerated to the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on naps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 60. SECTION 3. Descri tion of Assessment District: That the contempla e'f d W6`rT —, in a op n on o sa y Louncil. is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon Jistrict, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. ReDOrt of Engfneer: The City Council of said C4ty by Resolution No. Chas approvte tEi r� of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. 15(0 r RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTI0.9 S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected—iff-We—same—tTaRe and In the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council at said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first r:gular.meetine in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be - determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on April T,, T9W, at a our of pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucanonga, anv, and ali persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear ano show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this'Resolutton of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property In delivered signer thereof i le it identify hesm,and mt be t the City Cerkof saidCity priort the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upun the last egial /zed assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accounted by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. ECTION 7. Landscaping and L1 t ng Act of 1972: All the work posed —sFiall a one an Carr a roug FTn pursuance of an act of ature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and at of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Crle of of California. SECTION S. Wication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be R pursuan to ec on o e overnment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Oait Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a ornla, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ?517 i, 's — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA x STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. ' ,kgineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 13557, 13562, and 13559 (Caryn) to Street Lightinn Maintenance District No. 5 as Annexation No. 2 and setting the date of public hearing for April 6, 1988 ` RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adcpt the attached resoluti ns -• approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 2 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. S. Analysts /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 13557, 13562 and 13559 (Caryn) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 as Annexation 2 and setting the rubiic hearing date for April 6, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subject annexation is on file to the Engineering Division. Resp tful baitted, i :JAA• Attachments 159 A r r� RESOLUTION NO. '3 S— I1 $ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 2 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 WHEREAS, on March 2, 1900, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Cierk•of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report 1s sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should-be modified in any respect. NOV. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of .T. Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saTaTszessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 151 vy� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 Annexation No. 2 for Tracts 13557, 13559 and 13562 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is to compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. S. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have ar. effeci upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shorn on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenanca is considered of general benefit to all areas in the Crstrict and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, - emoval or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the Illumination of the suyJect area. VU :rYfA.r y�4 hv_ a i SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicted below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 is comprised of street light improvements on local streets for residential Improvements (single family, multi- family, condoaini,axs and apartments) within the Caryn Planned Community. Each dwelling unit- will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 is sham below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lmmp Size* YTD No. 2 Total 56001. 129 39 168 9500L 0 0 0 Miigh Pressure Sodium Vapor s: Total Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's 5BOOL 168 X $ 8.93 % 12 9500L 0 X $10.16 X 12 Total Annual Maint. Cost 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation Assessment Units this annex per page 4 Total Assessment Units lul Total Annual Maint. Cost 518,002.88 0 $18,002.88 470 167 637 U ar /u ion tex to each ems_ and d y and 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: ^Z, Total Annual Maintenance Cost. • $18,002-88 S2P,.'_E /ye nit. :3 No. a n s n District Y° Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Sect 6. %. r1.. SELT1fd1 S. Assessment 0legraa apses of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this rep( t and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 50, Annexation No. 2. These diagraes are hereby incorporated within the t of this report. ' SECTION 6. Assessment %a improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit ail uni•.s within the District and that assessment shall be equal for unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units p net acre. t, SECTION 7. Order of Events tr 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. r; 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony an determines to fora a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the Cit " Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. �;� F - i EWBIT •A` Properties and Improvements to be Included uIthln Annexation No. 2 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 5: 1(03 ■ Assess. No. of lam s to be Annexed Project Acreage -Unit — 13557 --- 30 8 13559 - -- 74 18 - -- - -- - -- - -- 13562 - -- 63 13 - -- - -- - -- --- T67 3� 1(03 ■ i- f. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.5 ANNEXATION NO. 2 M TURF ® GROUND COVER TURF REA GROUND COVER AREA TAG S.F. 71,129 S.F. SIDEWALK AREA 9,070 S.F. ° w CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A 3 tm COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO +3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - T ,m l� ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5- ^ ANNEXATION NO. 2 M TURF ® GROUND COYER TURF &REA 2,034 S.F. SIDEWALK AREA 18,560 S.F. GROUND COYER AREA 40,314 S.F. m` w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n 1355 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1"7 Nn _. tN i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.5 ANNEXATION NO. 2 TURF GROUND COVER nx AFEA 1,38! S.F. SiDEWALK AREA 13,701 S.F. K. ,, 79,432 S.F. CITY OIL RANCRO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF BAN B)ZRNARDINO • BTATE OF CALU?ORNIA _ N T RESOLUTION NO, '9 8- 1{ 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INUNTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING Wi1NTDL4LNCE DISTRICT 90. 5, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DES16'IATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO STRER LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5; PURSOINT TO THE LANDSCA"ING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Lindsaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highvays Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. D esc That the public interest ayd convenience yr e r Wn kion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and — operation of those street lights the boundaries of tho proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Sa d maintenance an.i operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SEE. ON 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w ti iiTn roadway �T9Fit--o t -way enunerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled *Annexation No. 2 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 50. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District; That the contemplated worK, in the op n on of said ty oonc is of more tka*i local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the - -pence of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is asnessed to pry the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain •Map of Annexation ho. 2 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 50 maps is on file in the ^fflce of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution 110. —*—Was approve a repo of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report to hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments amd for the extent of the work. 161 i r} � f• • j SECTION S. "Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a e same e t man n the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said Cityeand said Council will annually conduct a hearing'upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at *which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of�Hnariin : Notice is hereby given that on April S; heat min the City Council Chambers. at 9161 Base Line, in the Citjy..of'Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work;or extent of the assessment district, mty appear and show cause why said work -should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resoluticn of Intention. Protests must'be in writing and must contain a description of the property to which each signer thereof is, interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any Protest is not shuwn upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the o nir of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer 1s the owner of,the property so described: ` itn and L1 htln Act of 1912: All the work an can a roug in pursuance of an act of of California designated the Landscaping and iivision 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be marsuanir o Section 6061 of EFe-7GFY—e—r=--en—ETode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar.o, a fcrnia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. h CITY OF RANCHO,CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda`Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Setting public hearing for April 6, 1988, - Approval for Amending,•,Map Trwt No. 10827 -2, located south of Nilson Avenue betreen Haven and Hermosa Avenues, submitted by U.S. Homes, Incorporated It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the date for public hearing for approval of Amending Map, Tract 10627 -2 for April 6, 1988. Background /Analysis The 'eveloper. U.S. Homes, Incorporated, filed an ap711cation for Design Revi %. for Tract 10827 -2. On Nay 13, 1987, the Planning Commission app:°o -id said Design Review with a condition for an amended map for adjusting lot lines. The attached resolution sets the data for a public hearing to approve Mending Map, Tract No. 10827 -2 for April 6, 1988. 4 Respec submitted, RHN: s i F: F" •,iiri - _ !'- -syr:..= z_uf"`s, e�'r, �,'-.C•5 -', W:. -e; - - - , -•. - 'is•hG:a°,i.�s:9;,'y"- �v r. RESOLUTION N0. $8-1a0 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAROMOA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE MENDING MAP, TRACT_10827 -2 AND OFFERING A-TIME AND PLACE ' FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO y} WHEREAS, the Amending PAP of,Tract No 10827 -2, consisting of 99 lots, $ submitted by Relco Industries, Incorporated, Subdivider, located south of ;- Wilson Avenue between Hermosa and Haven Avenues, has been submitted to the J City of Rancho Cucamonga b said Subdivider, as provided in the Subdivision - Map Act of the State of City; aliifo California, and in compliance with the requirements of - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of v, Rancho Cucamonga, California, that notice is hereby given thmt on April 6, 1988, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line p� Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga any and all persons having objections to T" the Amend <ng Map of Tract IOW -2 my appear and show cause why said mep+ _ should not record. Protests must-be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. .:F 170 r T Y s c a d Q v Wilmn Avenue i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVLSION 1'71 I u a 3 fir, -r M r Tr Mending Tract 10627 -2 +a Li��: V N� e ORDINANCE NO. 340 AN ORDINANCE OF THE QTY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CICAMWA. CALIFORNIA. SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CICAMONGA CITY CODE. RMARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIHIITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vabicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, wet prima facie speed limits upon any portion of asp street not a state bigtarsy. (ii) The city Traffic Engineer bas conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified In Part E of this Ordinance. (iii) The deteraLmrion■ concerning prise facie speed limits set forth in Part B. balm, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey Identified in Sectim A (11), above. B. Ordieanco NON, THIrMoRE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CHCAHONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLONSt SECTION it Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follmai 10.20.020 Decrease of state low mamfmum @Dead. It in determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state la in greater than is reasonable or sofa under the conditions found to exist upon much streets, and t is declared that the Priem facie speed limit shall be an met forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Declared Prima Facie Nome of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 1. Archibald Avenue - Banyan to North and 50 2. Archibali Avenue - Fourth Street to IU�r+ -� Banyan Street 45 ' �C,P4/V s 3. Arrow, Scare - Baker to Haven 45 4. Banyan Street frm Beryl Street to /, t-( London Avenue 35 I - v i 11 a.. '31 a Ordinate No. 340 Page 2 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 5. Banyan Street - fcm vast City limits to Beryl Street 40 6. Base Line Road - Camalim to Haven 40 7. Base Lino Road - Roman to Haven 45 8. Baca Line Road - West City limits to Carnelian 45 9. Beryl Street - Banyan to and 45 10. Beryl Street - 8001 north of team to Banyan 40 11. Camelian Street - Foothill to and 45 12. Canter Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Church Street 40 13. Church Street - from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40 14. Church Street - Haven to Elm 40 15. Eighth Stree: - Grove to Haven 45 16. Etivanda Avenue - Foothill to Highland 45 17. Grove Avenue - Eighth to Foothill 40 18. Haven Avenue - Highland to Wilson 50 19. Hallman Avenue - Foothill to Alta Lama Dr. 35 20. Nollmaa Avenue - 5001 north of Hanranita to Valley View 40 21. Hellman Avenue - 6th to Foothill 45 22. Homo" Avenue - Base Line Rd. to Wilson Ave. 115 23. Highland Avenue - Amethyst to Archibald 35 24. Highland Avenue - from Archibald Avenue to Homo" Averm 35 25. Highland Avenue - frm Homo" Avenue to 800' vest of Haven 45 26. Hillside Road - from Reach Cate to Amethyst Street 35 27. Lemon Avenue - Archibald Avenue to Haven A.anua 40 28. Lmom Avenue - Jasper St. to Beryl St. 35 29. Ninth Street - Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 30. Rochester Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Baca Line Road 50 31. Sam Bernardino Road - frm Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 35 32. Sapphire Street - Banyan to and 45 33. Sapphire Street - 19th to Lemon 40 34. Spruce Avenue - Elm Avenue to Base Line Rd. 40 35. Terra Vista Parkway - Church to Belpim 40 36. Tumor Avenue - Eighth to Foothill 45 37. Turner Avenue (Homo" Ave.) - Foothill to Base Line Road 45 38. Victoria Avenue - free Etivmda Avenue to Route 15 40 1-73 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Ordinauca No 340 Declared Prims,facia None of Street or Portion Affected SDeed Licit (MPH) Victoria Park Lane 35 Victoria Nindrows Loop (north 6 south) 35 Vivayard Avenue - Church to Base Line Rd. 40 Vinyard Avenue - from 8th Street to foothill Blvd. 45 Nbittram Avenue - Etiwanda to east City Limits 40 Page 3 (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982: Ord. 39 Section 5.1. 1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/92 124 (i) Both a!zty -five (65) milts per hour and fifty -five (55) miles per hour are opeods which an more than are reasonable or sofa; (11) The Liles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are - - speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; (iii) The miles per hoar stated are hereby declared to be the prima facto speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorised and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. SECTION 2 The City Clark shell certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. SECTION 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall canna the same to be published within fifman (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Resort, n newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. Y ; Sa S ° ORDINANCE NO. 70 (P) AN ORDINANCH OF THE CITY CJONCIL OF MIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlONGA. CALUORMA. A!' MIND SECTION 2.24.210 Op. AND AZMHG A NEY SECTION 2.24.220 T0- CHAPTER 2.24 OF THE RANCHO CUUM GA MUNICIPAL CODE. TREEIDT INCREASING CRIMINAL PENALTIES, AND ADDING CIVIL REMEDIES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Section 2.24.210 of Chapter 2.24 of Title 2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is ""dad to read, in words and figures, as zollwal "2.24.210 Penalty for Violation of Chaetor. T Olt shall be unlawful for say person. firm, partner- ship. or corporation to violate any provision or to fall to comply with any of the raquiroments of this Chapter. Any person, firm partnership, or corporation violating soy provision of this Chapter or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be demad guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars, or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and inyrinon- mat. Poch such person. firm, partnership, or corporation shall be domed guilty of a separate offense for tech and every day or any portion thereof during which any viola- tion of any of the provisions of this Chapter is commit- ted, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partner- ship, or corporation, and shall be domed punishable therefor as provided in this Chapter.' SECTION 2. A am Section 2.24.220 is bersby added to Chapter 2.24 of Title 2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Coda to read, in words and figures. as follwat 02.24.220 Civil Remedies Available. "A violation of amp of the provisions of thin Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by masaa of restraining order, pre - liminary or permanent injunction, or in any other matter provided by lam for the abatement of such nuisance." 1-1S i i Ordinance No. 70(P)a,.`;�; _ h. Page 2 : "�� - _ `- ;., «i_g SZCIION 9. The City Council declares that provision. section; pare, graph, sentence or cord of this Ordinance ba, rendered or dazlered invalid by any final court action in'a court of 'competent jnrisdictiou.•or, by,rasson of any preemptive legislation, the raisiding provisions. sections. -. parigraphs. - sentences, and words of this Ordinance -shall remain in full force and effect. .. . 4 SEMON 4. The City, Clerk shall certify to the �psesaje of this Ordinance and shall cause the stun to be published within fifteen 425) days _ after its passage at' least- ones in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario. C►lilorm a.. andIcircalated fn the City of Rancho Cacamenga, California. ' I CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA STAFF REPORT c3 DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FR94: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 THE N C Appeal or the Planning omm ss on s c s on requ r ng payment of an in -lieu fee for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Carnelian Street and Highland Avenue - APS 201- 214 -11 I. RECOMWNIATIOM: Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision and deny the appeal requesting a reduction in the length used to calculate in -lieu fees for the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Carnelian Street. II. BACKGROUND: The project consists of a subdivision of 3.53 acres into 12 single family lots (Exhibit 'B'). It was conditionally approved by the Planning Comissien on January 27, 1988. The Conditions of Approval required the payment of one -half in -lieu fees as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities on the opposite side of Carnelian Street from the center of Highland Avenue to the center of the future Foothill Freeway right -of -way as sham on Exhibit "CO. fie Developer is requesting that the length used to calculate in- lieu fees be reduced by excluding tha portion from his tract south boundary to the center of the future Foothill Freeway right -of- way. His request letter is attached as Exhibit 'D'. lit. ANALYSIS: The developer feels the intent of the Underground Policy applies to the 'typical' City block. He feels that his project being located adjacent to a future freeway is a unique situation; therefore, should not be required to pay in -lieu fees for the portion within the freeway right -of -ray. )1-) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13721 PAGE 2 MARCH 2, 1998 The decision of the Planning Commission was based on Item Sa of Resolution No. 97 -96 (Exhibit "E "). This section states that in- lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property being developed from property line to property line or, in the case of corner properties, to the center of adjacent streets. The (•) after the word "Street" in Section 1 clarifies that all reference: to streets in the resolution also means alleys, railroad or channel rights -of -way, etc., which staff interprets to include freeway rights- of -w;y. The Planning Commission recently approved projects at the northeast corner Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue and also Highland Avenue between Heliman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue with similar requirements. The future cost of undergrounding the overhead utilities within the Foothill Freewsy corridor may be the responsibility of the City. Therefore, whatever in -lieu fees paid through development ,will. lessen the burden to the City in the future. - The in -lieu foe for the future undergrounding of the overhead utilities is approximately $55,692 which amounts to $15,600 per acre or $4641 per unit. However, Southern California Edison is in the process of reducing their fees and the revised amount is estimated at $47,073 which amounts to $13,186 per acre or $3 922 per unit. These costs are not considered excessive co parerj to what has been required of other projects within the City. IV. CONCLUSION; The requirement for payment of me -half in -lieu fees as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities on the opposite side of Carnelian Street from the center of Highland Avenue to the center of the future Foothill Freeway right -of -way is consistent with current policy. Tnerefore, staff feels the requirement for payment of in -lieu fees, as conditioned by the Planning Commission, is appropriate and reasonable. Respectf2p. y submitted, v. � RHM:3 . Attachments: Vicinity Hap (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Tract Nap (Exhibit 080) Existing Overhead Utilities (Exhibit "C") Developers Letter (Exhibit "D") Policy Resolution 87 -96 (Exhibit "E ") Conditions of Approval l ?8 r' I 111a stae CITY OF h h RANCHO CUCAMONGA :A fl IN Di DI = =4 Ro. f, �1 h J m iG rii N rani- TT 137 EI Trrm VICINITY MAP EXMBrr R f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s eI 0Itt. 4V, m NM 1 i 1TZM: TT 13'7 2.'l - TITLE; SITE PLAN ESHIHPI� 4 - -a 4--I I 1-TI LA -; -;"! -� ! BERYL . �-- I l�RRK 12KV ELECrlCAL IN f TELE7MUNlZAT10N PROPOSED FREEWAY j I I I - I �I I }' -"1-- RANLMO ~ VOWS SHOPPING -�- III IL--4 - , I- - --� I ,.. 2. N r- Ty OF PFEIl: il- 13"12'? RANCHO CUCAMONGA T:TLE QVERMIAD mUTI LITI ES ENGINEERING DIVISION EXEMM.. EUGENE H. LOWE February 1, 1968 Antrnur AT uW E6 DoR� City Clerk 532 � City of Rancho Cucamenge _ 9140 Baseline Road (8111) 790-4509 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91710 RE. Planning Commislon Appeal This Is to give notice of appeal from the Planning Commission decision of January 27. 1988. In the matter of agenda item E. Environmental Asreaament and Tentative Tract 11727- Janseena. For the record, on January 21, 1968 1 corresponded with the Community Development Department advising that the owners of the property, The Pacific Southwest Conference of the Evangelical Covenant Church were no longer represented by Mr. Janssens, but by myself or Mr. lames Engwall. I enclosed the $126 fee for this process This Is to appeal only one portion of the Planning Commission's action, that U, that ruling having to do with the mode of computing the assessment to the owner for future underground power line Installation. Under the city's fomula the computation of footage upon which this assessment Is based is the front+," of the property plus extending to the centerline of the future freeway, which distance amounts to approximately 495 fees At $125 per foot this equals $61,875. It is true that this computation Is based on city's ro���gu18110113 In the matter, however, 1 wish to point out that the of1�Ig6L8 was designed to apply to the typical city situation regard :ng location and distances pertaining to city blocks In our case we have the unique altuat!on of the distances of a freeway Involved. It Is our contention that we should pty our fair share of the underground power litres Installation BUT be assessed as to the footage of our property, that is , approximately 215 feet which at $125 per foot equals $ 26,875. The owner of the abutting property. Celtrans, should pay for the other approximate 2801, $15,000, which would be their fair share, since that is the amount of frontage of their property. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. SI ce y. EUG H. LOWE ehl/ cc James Engwall P`. Because of my travel schedule please do NOT schedule the Carl Kobbins appearance before the City Council on February 23 or March 16. _w•i RESOLUTION N0. 87 -96 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CDMISSION OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE iNDERGR0MOING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION 80. 86 -77 WHEREAS, the Planning Commissiou of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 46-77 which was adopted on the 28th day of Hay. ISM and establish the revised policy contained herein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucmonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in ardor to proeoto a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, ThEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments. except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting` poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street*: a. Said lines shall to undergrounded at the divaloper's expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a start length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an fn -lieu fee for the full mount per Section 6. c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one -half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines on the o site side of the street from the o ect: The Developer s a DaY + rello the C11-y-To—r-0—nez.Falf the amount per Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with and be e g a SO that he Dears a total expense equivalent to one-half ttvmd total ncost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4. Pole lines cantainin 66KV or lac r electrical lines: All lines shat'. be un ergroun or n- eu ors Da n actor onto with section 1, 2 or 3, above, except for 66 KY or larger electrical lines. LINi C9&RCIUNWN6 POLICY TUM. 1 rLnLUTICN ` 1%3 EXMnrl4 N E U (J ax 3 1 5. units of Responsibilities: a. In -lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property being developed from property line to property line (the center of adjacent streets for orw properties). b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend to: (1) the first existing pole off -site from the project boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) a now pole erected at a project boundary (across the streat for corner properties), or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a protect boundary, except at a corner. 6. Fee Amount: The amount for in -lieu fees shall equal the length (per 'A—Fron -Mal uses the unit amount as established by the City Council based upon irrfnrmOlon suppliad by the utility caoprnie: and as updated periodically as denied necessary. 7. Exrm tions: The following types of projects shall be exempt from this policy: a. The addition of functional equipment to existing dayslopsents, such as: loading docks, silas, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, Cooling towers, enclosure of in outdoor storage area, parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc. b. Building additions or nee free standing buildings of less than 2S% of the floor area of the existing buildings) on the same assessors parcel, or 5,000 squara feet, whichever is less. c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing develoaments, such as: reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. d. Interior tenant teprovments and non - construction CUPS. e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility easements with a heavy concentration of services to adjacent developments, and the utility lines are 500' or more from the right of way line of a Special Boulevard. g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600, offsite from both the, project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to contribute to future undergrounding. Ali references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel rights -of -way, etc. I$V err. „e APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JIME 1987. PLANNING ISSION OF. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA BT:j� e y ��ia rwn � I, Brad Buller, Deputy Sreretary of the,Pimm"q Comisylon o9 the City of Rancho Cucaeonya, do hereby certify that tho.foregoing Resolution was duly and Cittyylof RnchhooCut.monge, passed, a regular meet ng ofethe Plannin taiiAtion hold on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the following vote= to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEI NOES: COMMISSIONERS: TKSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: R]NE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEf w01i•. 7. o A 4. 3 PLANNINS COMSSION FESOLI/IION 178. 88-14 TT 13727 - JANSSENS January 27, 1988 Page 3 - 2. _Landscaping shell be required between the sidewalk and - the will on" all corner side yards, fie final landscape plans shall ba �= rev&W and approval by the City Planner prior ' to the issuance o'r :bu:lding permits. 3. The driveway on lot 1 shalt take access off of - the street to the south. 4. The driveway on Lot 8 shall take access off of the street to the west. j; S. A sound wsll as required by the acoustical analysts, sha51 be installed along the south track bovndory. The final design of the wall shall be reviewed and approved by the planning Commission prior to tha issuance of building permits. 6. A final acoustical analysis shall be required to identify necessary mitigation measures to reduce the noise levels within the residences below 4S CNEL. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (b) Engineering Division 1- AM fn -lieu fee as contr•butlon to the future undergroundinyy of the existing overhead utilities (teleCe®mfcatfan and rilectrical) on the OP"Ite side of Carnellon Street shall be pald to the City prior to the issuance of bull ding Permits. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount tfaes the length from the center of Highland Avenue to the center of Cal Trans future Foothill Freeway right -of -way. 2. The storm drain pipe shall be designed to carry a capacity of Q100. 3. The catch basins shall be designed with a capacity of 1.5 Q108. 4. A permit will be required from the Hetropoiitan Water District for any work within their rlght- of -May. rmFw. TT 13121 TrUb CONDITION OF RPPRGVAL EXH BM. e 1 i may- • S A773D6i_r of KAMM ? 1'r)2t.Gt: den.✓^ mail clack for the Ci ty of Beaeho Caceaoasa, do korak7 near that oo ; 19 19BP at rPPra=i>teb17 o'clock Vim• (a.u. or E deposited in the Caesongs Breath of the Tlt:tad Dtstae Peet Office best at 9607 'Bwinees M ntar2Drf;j, a letter addressed to a" rgardinl CITY COUNCIL MEETING PA B 730 p.m. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 - THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST CONFERENCE Of THE EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH See Attached 11st for Names and addresses 8it34d: Date: �)r (rato,v to t!dtp•i6 '3 Office after sigaLnt) 1 P4 PUBLIC HEARING 0 its- T-� RAACHD'CUCAMONG; CITY COUNCILI., 30: W The Rancho Cucaiionga.City,'C6undil will be holding public hearings, at p.m. on March 2. 1988 at the'Lionis'-Pirk Communiti 'Sul ldiKgtilocated" at Mft Base- Rancho Cucamonga', CalifornW 91730 to consider thel'followln% Line Road, described project(s):•C', APPEAL OF CONDITIONS 'APPROVAL: FOR TENTATIVE -TRACT 13727 THE PACIFIC ;CHURCH �, APPe 1. or the COVENANT fee afor future P anning Co:nmisslon-s ceCISIM Mull 1119 v undergrounding of exfstingJ loverhead utilities along Carnelian Street - for, a cy proposed residential subdivision located at the southwest - corner of W.Hillan- Street and Highland Avenue - APH 201_214-11 Anyone having _ 4 * concern concern or questions on an v of the above item are welcome to �t ok. r #. r.ni.o fna nivig:m at (7141 989-1962 or visit the offices located at 9340 Base Line Road, Unit B. .klso, anyone objecting to or in favor of the above, may appear in person at the above-described meeting or may submit their concerns in writing to the Engineering Division. City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to said meeting. Febru ? 1938 U �" If TMN Di ex -1 Rancho Cucamonga City Council All, .;— 1. 1062-621-56 I T. & Michelle N Cr,well - F--erald Avenue 'heta$ W & Mirlam A Kendall -41 F--erald Bay 0 Cuc=OngR, CA 91730 Laguna Beach, G. 92651 0. christlue Sutherland 1062-621-64 F--era-ld Street Anthony R. & Sandra Eozonier.Jr. 0 Cuc=Onga, CA, 91730 6476 Holly oak Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 NMI ei Of Record %Irame,& Address --f"FACIfle Southwest cov. Church' 2120 Foothill Blvd., Suite 215 LA Verne, G. 9IT50 ,Representative New 4 Address Carl KabbLus C.T.K. Applicant Inc.. 3333 So. Brea Canyon ,,ad, 0220- 4 Address Diamond Bar. G. 9XT65 S=e 201,-214-io Pacific SGuthllest C". Church 1062-611-53. David A. & Beth I. jqOtO 1062-621-6.5 2120' Foothill Blvd., Suite 215 LaWerm RIT33 Alu Lam Drive Arturo A. & Ruble Rivon 6466 Holly Oak- Drive' 2 G. 9IT50 Alta 14Ma, G. 91T01 U4chO CUMMOngs, CA. 91TC1 201-221-18, 24 & 38 letrOPOUtan Water District 1062-621-36, 19. 20, 27 & 28 ThOM3 W- & 4(irlaz A. lC62-6PI-66 Southern Cal,4fornls kddreas Irot on File Kendall 141 Etarald Bay Laguna Frank M. & Susam-L. L),kel 6491 Jasper Street Beach, G. 92651 CuMmnu , CA. 91T30 .01-221-25 'reater Alta I Loma Invest=ent Co. 1062-6a-29, 30- 31, 32 & 39 Thocas W & Hiriam EUGENE.H LOWS 302 V--Sam Bernardino Road 'cvlc&, ' A. Kendall 141 Enerald Bay Attorney at Law CA 91722 Laguna Beach, G. 92651 532 El Dorado Street Pasadena, CA 91101 !01-221-L2 :ity of Ramcho Cuca="g, 1062-621-40, hi, 42, 43 & 44 'hocas W. 1 Hirialm 4dress Not On File A. Kendall 141 emerald Bay Laguna Beach, G. 92651 '62-611-50 klbert L & F09011ft P D. Orti:t 60 Emerald 1062-621-5L 52, 53, 54 & 55 Thc=3 W. & N�Lrlam A Kendall PH CITY COUNCIL 3-2-88 Street OchO Cucamonga, CA 91730 141 F-hemld Bay Lacuna Beach, G. 92651 .;— 1. 1062-621-56 I T. & Michelle N Cr,well - F--erald Avenue 'heta$ W & Mirlam A Kendall -41 F--erald Bay 0 Cuc=OngR, CA 91730 Laguna Beach, G. 92651 0. christlue Sutherland 1062-621-64 F--era-ld Street Anthony R. & Sandra Eozonier.Jr. 0 Cuc=Onga, CA, 91730 6476 Holly oak Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 NMI C STAFF REPORT cnQc�� DATE: )larch Z, 1988 Members of the City Council TO: Mayor and PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dart Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES9iENT_ VICTORIA COMBIMroPosa — e yto�sain Y an Use Permit for shopping to require a centers and certain Conditional comercial uses. ENVIROt.7SENTAL ASSE59WXT AND TERRA VISTA CMM ITY aPLAN `-.- ane s oe°r'n y do xt to require 'a for shopping centers and certain bondttional Use permit commercial uses. 1 Rou -r agpl ove both Pamendment Commission rough dopt�iondOf the attached Ordinances. II. Ty- C0uncilh nd theePlanningaCommissiron utotrequire Conditional Use permits d Communities. cenThesre within reasons Terra Vista and amendment$Vareeras follows: 1. Allow the Commission /Council to apply conditions of approval regulating security, hours, maintenance, etc. 2 Provide opportunity for broad public review through public hearing process. pp 8. planning Commission to ensure use 15 being loperated ttnnabproper manner. reasonstcis support of the onamendeents �rt and llthe e scope and applicability of the changes. Iq0 - r MR, . CITY 'COUWCi ifAiF. REPORT AXV RE: VCPA 86-01 -3 TVCPA MOV A; _ Karch 2, 1988 Page 2 Unless otherwise ✓ specified in the Ordfn'ancei' by the efty Council,, theta amendments wouldt'requlre,any project for whiCh,3 buildfng,�- permit has not been issued., by." the effective 'date, of the Ordinance' to obtairCrevies�lind.,.app-roial' of,,& Conditional Use Pers; it. The follovfng,lariguage,,or��lialler-lanjuAge could be inserted into the Ordinances to exempt,"ipproijed'projects: SECT�ON-3.�,,T-,hi,,Iii#o,vi,sions NO; this Ordinance shall not t , a pply to Mn any an7- &I V'SOPI icAtJ onWfor -shopping centers. for I wti ch Mea roval, Arid -f 3suanci'of building permits were granted prlor,tb effect1ii•,date,oVthfs Ordinance. �A III. FLANNING COMISSiON• The, Planning Comission' voted unanimously (4- `U:r-graTe—sTe—y-Us—ent)-to'recomend that,the.City Council approve .4 both amendoents;- — Lewfs Mows spoke t - the public herring -in, avista support of the amendment to' the Terra Comunity' Plan. -In order to expedite these amendments as directed by the City Council and Commission, we were unablCL'to provide; you with the approved minutes of the Commission meeting. Nowiver, an excerpt of the unapproved minutes regarding these itm--will be available at the meeting of Ha�ch 2,'1988. Rest Ily ted ra � C city P 1pner -ko Bd :DC:ko Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of Ffibruary 24, 19BB Planning Commission Resolutions Recomendfng Approval Ordinances _f-- M 1 1 6 1 1 L 0 n x\ s + CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: STAFF REPORT° � B DATE: February 24, 1988 :7r, TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Colman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEMT AMD VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAIT proposal to amen a Victoria aamun y an x to require a Conditional Use PerHt for shopping Centers and certain commercial uses. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY proposal to amend the errs s omen Conditional the Permit for shopping ing centersa require and certain commercial uses. I . BACKGROUND: This amendment is the result of a Planning Commission an y ourcil requests to require Conditional Use Permits for shopping centers within Victoria and Terra Vista. The primary purpose is to bring the approval process for shopping centers within the two planned communities into consistency with the Development Coda requirement for a CUP process for shopping centers ++hich applies throughout the rest of the City. II. SCOPE OF AMENDMENT: This amendment would: 1. Require a CUP for shopping centers within the Victoria and Terra Vista Pldnned Communities; and 2. Make minor amendments to certain use regulations to gain internal consistency. IiI ANALYSIS: A. General - Shopping centers within Terra Vista and Victoria are suFSe—cT to the Development Review process. A Conditional Usa Permit was not originally required for shopping centers in the two planned communities because it was felt that the land use compatibility issues could bM adequately addressed through the land use planning of the Cammunity Plans. However, the City Council recently developed conditions of approval to govern the operation of shopping centers and to mitigate environmental iTENS i a s t 4� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT -r VCPA 88 -01 - City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA 8301 - City of Rancho Cucamonga February 24, 1988 - Page 2 effects which are desirable to apply to all shopping centers within the City, The scope and nature of conditions which can be applied under the Conditional use Permit process is much greater than that allowed by ldw under the Development Review PM-cess. 8. ►on Require a CUP1 - There are several reasons why a Cond ono se erl t process is desirable for shopping ` centers: I. Public Review - A CUP has a noticed public hearing as requTFES-3y'—state law. The Development code states it ( best: The Conditional Use Permit process is intended to afford an opportunity for y broad public review and evaluation of these requirements and characteristics, to provide adequate mitigation of any adverse impacts, and to ensure that all site development regulations and Performance standards are provided in compliance with the Development Code. Staff feels that it is appropriate to require a Conditional Use Permit process for protects with the scale and intensity of a shopping center which can significantly impact the surrounding neighborhood. 2. Condltions�LAporoval - The type of conditions that can be p e to a on tional Use Permit, which is a discretionary action with regard to use, is much broader than those which my be applied to a Development Review application. The Planning Commission's discretion on a nevelopment Review application is generally limited to matters of design. During their review of the NuYest shopping center, the City Council established conditions of approval regulating security, hours, maintenance or other characteristics of operation which could not have been imposed on a Development Review application. The Council indicated that these conditions should be applied consistently on ail shopping centers within the City. 3, X erlodf w - The CUP process gives the Planning Coma sslon authority to periodically review, modify or revoke a CUP, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.04.0306. The COWSsion may periodically review any CUP to ensure that it is being operated in a manner consistent conditions au 11a inawhichisnot detrimental to the p health, or 9 a wi+T PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VCPA 88.01 - City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA 88.01 - City of Rancho Cucamonga February 24, 1988 Page 3 which is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. If the CClOfasion finds that the CUP is not being conducted in an Appropriate manner upon conclusion of a public hearing, then the Commission my modify the conditions of approval or revoke the CUP. The former „- Scar's Head was exugle of a CUP which rtr,jired rerfow `a and modfficatior° As A result of problems with the operation of the bar (f.a. - noise, loltsring, fighting, f littering, etc,), IV. APPLICABILITY: The Terra Vista Community clan designatas one c n — su - regional) shopping center and two neighborhood shopping center sites. The Terra Vista Village neighborhood shopping center, located at Haven And Base Line, is under - construction. In addition, Terra Vlsta has several areas along h Foothill Boulevard designated for a mix of commercial, office and residential uses. The Victoria Comnity Plan designates three neighborhood shopping canter sites (called 'Village Cam•ercial') for which no applications have been submitted to date. The Victoria Gardens regional mall is also located within Victoria and is required to obtain a ConOftional Use Permit under the terns of the :` ner Participation Agreement. Surrounding the mall are approximately 200 acres of Regionally Related commercial land. Neither the Terra Vista nor the Victoria Community Plans define a > shopping center; hence, the Dwrelopment Code definition would apply: SHOPPING CENTER: A group of commercial establishments, planned, developed, owned, or managed as a unit, with off- street parking provided on the site. Therefore, the following districts are affected by t.,;, ;r000sed amendment: TERRA VISTA Neighborhood Commercial INC) Commercial (C) Community Commercial (CC) Recreational Commercial (RC) Mixed Use Financial, Restaurants, Residential (MFC) Commercial, Office, Residential (M) Hospitals A Related Facilities, Offices, Comm-!rcial (MHO) R FIAMNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VCPA 80.01 - City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA 88-01 - City of Rancho Cucamonga February 24, 1988 Page 4 VICTORIA Village Com ercial (V) Reg Related ice /CO Regional Center (RC) (RR) This amendment would chang9e the regulations for all of these districts. Unless o•herwise specified in the ordinance, this amendment would require any project for which a building permit has not been issued by the effective data of tho ordinance to obtain review and approval of a Conditional Use Pertat. The following or similar language could be inserted into the ordinance to exempt approved proiects; The provisions of this ordinance shall not apply to any and all applications for shopping centers for which approval "and issuance of building permits were granted prior to tho effective date of this ordinance. V. OTHER MINOR AMENDMENTS: This amendment also proposes to modify the use regu a ors or cer ain uses for internal consistency among the planned communities, as follows: Massage parlors, adult movie theaters and adult bookstores would be prohibited within the planned communities, and The following uses would require a CUP within neighborhood shopping centers: a. Automobile service stations b. Convenience markets c. Fast -food restaurants d. Nine and liquor stores e. Restaurants with entertainment and /or serving of alcoholic beverages RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission COnOUCt a PuoTfC heering, make any necessary modifications to the ordinance, and forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Re fu ted, _� d er City an 88:Dr, :vc Attachcents: Resolutions ;. Ordinances 1 -J= 14s �..ii.aUl• _ t ....... �. `U kF IV, f�v RESOLUTION W. A RESOLUTION OF THE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APMVAL OF VICTORIA' COMM PLAN , AMEWMENT 88.01, TO MODIFY THE COMMMMITY PLAN TEXT TO rti REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SHOPPING CENTERS AND CERTAIN USES, IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARDS SECTION, 3F THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN WHEREAS, on the 24th day of February, 1988, the Planning Cummission held a duly advertised hearing public pursuant to. Section, 65854• of the y California Goverment Cole. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the followln g�din s• " 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a ` comprehensively 9lanned urban a community within the ' deo Arent otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and ` 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plar, and with related development and growth amanagement policies of the City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilties, public ut ;lities, and public services required by development with the District. 2eoticreate Rancho this pro ecf—wT stgnififlcentpadverse effect on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of A Negativr, Declaration on February 24, 1988. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65x55 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Co mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Victoria Planned Community Amendment 88-01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adope Victoria Planned Community Amendment 88.01 to r4odify the Community Plan per the attached Ordinance. r r4 ry � I C 3w ar .i t abw .f`Y+'e' `�i � � '7Y��.',aS,x4`1 ` � •. �8• �L•+i M1YTS.:� PLANNING COMUSSION RE906UTION''N0. ••y ;;;1 YCPA 88-01 = ;C1tyof 'Ranaho'CucMMga, .. 6, _ 5•; FebNary 24'e"1988' Page 2 IIPI'ROYED AND ADO!TED -PHIS 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988. pWINiNG COIf1ISSION OF THE CITY; OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I I ` t n iii BY:�.a r �. Larry 1. McNIS1 . , a rya ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the planning CtM1SSlbn''Of the C1ty'of Rancho Cucawga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was, duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Camission of the City of Rancho Cucanonga; at a regulor mating of the Planntnp Co�atssf`on hold'. on the 24th day of February, 1988, by the fol loving vote-to- t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A � V r.' 0 RESDLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CU'CAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN RFq�UIREE A CONDITIONAL USE PPERMIT F R SHOPP1 CARS AND CERTAIN USES IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARDS SECTION OF THE TERRA VISTA COMITY PLAN held a duly WHEREAS. advertised n the 24th day of February, 1998, the Planning Commission California Goverment CodeD hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the fall owing1 dingsA 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth amanagement policies of the City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facllties, public utilities, and public services required by development with the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro m not create a significant adverse effect on the environment February 24, 1988. . and recommends City Coune1, the issuance of a Negative Declaration on NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 88.01. 2 The Planning Cormrission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 88-01 to modify the Community Plan per the attached Ordinance. . •fit p'tr%�� v:"��".r Y.�•yF' —n - .�Z.�.._.sy ;.,�, -•{:t•;:• .. ... - °7��y. .•5+t�,'�:��1 °�'�',�; PLA MING'C"ISSION 'RESOLUTION "RD. TYCPA 86-Olt- City of Rancho Cucamonga ; February 24;,1900 Psne 2 � 4.1 :fill 1 APPEOVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF FENUARY, 1980. PLANNING CUMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PANC40 CUCAMIONOA BY: l-arryZ"ifcR e , Crialrun ATTEST: Brad 3311er, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission o`..ihe- City.ot Rancho Cucamonga, do'. hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced;' passed, and adopted 'by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of February, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: •i . -, a2 Lbw +: rY•t" ,i. '" _. t .. `ai J.T:EKKh1 "yC -4 i ORDINANCE NO. 3 Lai A4 ORDINANCE OF TNE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLIL4HED" CONMUNtiY N4EN01(E(T 08.01 TO MODIFY THE CQMRRIITY PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE "A CONDITION& USE PERMIT FOR SHOPPING CENTERS AND CERTAIN USES W THE CW&RCIAL STANDARDS SECTION OF THE VICTORIA CONIUMITY PUN " The City Council of the ,inky of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain as 7 follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: i ' A. That We Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, F' following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the Community Plan text aman8eent :' hereinafter described, and " s City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. D. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D This Community Plan text amendment will have no significant envirormrental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The Co®unity Plan text of the Victoria Planned Community, -sFr TTT, Section I, Regulations and Standards For Development, subsectio 'Commercial Standards", commending on Page 235, is hereby auended to read as follows: COMMERCIAL STANDARDS 1 General provisions for lend uses designated as Regional Center, Regional- related Commercial and Village Commercial. a Site Development Standards: (1) Building site coverage: No maximum subject to Development Approval Process. (2) Building site width: 150 foot minimum (3) Building height: 65 feet typical maximum; buildings over 65 feet subject to a Conditional Use Permit. O , CITY CQUNCIL OR lWXE NO. RE: VPCA 68.01 page 2 ' b. Uses not permitted within tho Planned Community: (1) Massage parlors 2) "Adult• Movie Theaters 3) "Adult" Bookstores C. sh Wal Centirs. To ensure that the goals and policies of We w9wral an and COMMI y flan are implemented, a Coeditfoeal Use haft shall be required for shopping tees a.In such a review, the following criteria, shall be (1) The transition from emre sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitfgate commercial activities ke such as loading, lighting, and trash collection; (2) The center has been planned as a group of organized uses and structures; j (3) The center "is designed with one theme with buildings and landscaping consistent in deafer similar architectural style, simflar exterior building meterfals, and a coordinated landscaping theme); A (4) The center mikes provisions for consistent mmintenarce, reciprocal access end reciprocal parking; (6) Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a coaprehensive circulation system; and (6) The development or approval of any portion of a center sull require the develorent of a rerceptual development plan which shall vmsider such things as, but not limited to, circulation, unafon architectural design, drainage /grading, Buffers, phased improvements and landscaping. 2. REGIONAL CENTER a. The following general categories of uses shall bn permitted: (1) Retail businesses, including, but not limited to: o department stores a drug stores o Jewelry stores c nook stores o record stores o hi- fidelity equipment sales - o clothing stores sales o shoe stores I ■ CM COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. RE: VPCA 68.01 Page 3 _ o candy stores o photography equipment sales (2) Service businesses, including, but not limited to: o watch.and Jewelry repair o beauty parlors o travel agencies 0 locksmiths o banks and financial institutions o movie theaters (3) Administrative and professional offices. (4) Commercial recreation. (5) Reetaurants, (6) Nurseries and Cirden supply stores, provided that fertiliser of any type shall be solo and stored in packaged Porn only. (7) Public Utility offices. (8) Aolesale business offices w;th samples on the premises, but not to include general storage. (9) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses as per 'tted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. (10) P"Itted Community Facilities listed on Page 241. b. Uses permitted subject to specific approval of Conditional Use Permit: (1) Animal care facilities, not including kennels. (2) Parkipg lots and parking buildings. (3) Automobile service stations and car washes. (4) Automobile sales and service. (5) Electric distribution switch stations. (6) Communication equipment buildings. (7) Public utility booster stations. (8) Commercial recreation. (9) Accessory structures and uses necessar or customarily ;p, incidental to the above Lies as speciflcal,ly provided r ; t. m 3'WV CITY CDU'NCIL ORDIRMICE. NO RE: VPCA 88-01 Page 4 for by the'use permit and the Toning 9rdinance q the, City of Rancho,Cucamongs. (10) Conditionally permitted Comunity Facilities l'isted, on Page 241. (11) Shopping centers siabject to proOsiorls I"•Sectfcft 1 on Page 235. - 3. REGIONAL RELATED WD USES r4 a. The following" general categoriel of uses shall bv periltted: (1) Petall business, Including, but not limited to- o uepartment stores 0 .1urniture stores 0 automobile stores 0 pet stores 0 motorcycle sales and service 0 home improvement certer 0 hardware stores 0 grocery stores 0 clothing stores 0 meat markets or delicatessens (2) Service business, including, but not limited to: 0 banks, financial Institutions 0 automobile repair 0 blueprinting and photostating 0 cleaning and pressing business o laundries 0 locksmiths 0 mortuaries 0 mechanical auto wash a plumbing supply 0 movie theaters 0 photographic supplies or studios 0 equipment rental (3) Administrative and professional offices. (4) Restaurants. (5) Cmamercial . (6) Automobile service facilities. (7) Nurseries and arden sugplytstores, pro yid?d that fertilizer Iny vt of type e stored and sod n packaged form only. 2c) 3 d. _7 CITY COUN'Ci Cii"INAH cc No., RE: VPCA• 88-01, Page S (8) P61,1;.utility offices. (9) Hotels and motels. (10) Self-service laundry and self-service dry cleaning facilities. (11) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily, incidental to the above uses'as. permitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. (12) Permitttd,Communi;ty Facilities listed on Pags 241. c. Uses permitted subject to a Car Inal Use Permit: (1) AMmal care facilities. (2) Public utility boos ' Ler stations. (3) Parking lots and parking buildings. (4) Public utility exchange and substations. (5) Public buildings. (6) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses as specifically provided for by the use permit. (7) Conditionally pemitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241. (8) Shc7ping Cent*rs scbject to provisions in Section I on Page 235. 4. VILLAGE COWRCIAL a The following general categories of uses sha be permitted: (1) Retail businesses, including but not limited to: o grocery stores 0 seat markets. delicatessens 0 produce markets 0 drug stores 0 dry good Stores 0 hardware sales 0 pet stores 0 clothing stores 0 florist shops -Zoq ti I r' :k CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE W. RE: VFCA 88.01 Page 6 e (2) Service businesses, including but not limited to: o ' banks„ financial institutions o barber shops, beauty parlors o locksmiths ,. o laundry and dry cleaning establishments o self - service laundry and dry cleaning (3) Administrative and professional offices (4) Governmental offices (5) Restaurants'(ettnr than fist food), including incidental svrvinp of Mer and wine but without a cocktail ltwyle, bar, entertainment or dancing. (6) Accissery structures and uses necessary or cus'. -OU[N- incidental to the above as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. b. Uses permitted subject to specific approval of a Conditional Use Permit: (1) Automotive service stations (2) Convenience markets (3) Fast food restaurants (4) Wine and liquor stores (5) Restaurants with entertainment and/or serving of alcoholic beverages (6) Shopping centers subject to provisions in Section 1 on Page 235 (7) Conditionally permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of— n ar o, a ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. QOS 6 , r x r- ' ORDINANCE NO. S 'Z CUUC�INGJw, CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING TERM VISTA COMWNITY . PLAN AMENDMENT 8"1, TO M401FY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT ` r �.4 TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SHOPPING CENTERS AND CERTAIN USES IN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL STANDARDS ( SECTION OF THE TERRA VISTA COMIUNITY PLAN h tot t ows: he City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain as IVA SECTION 1: The -City Council hereby finds and determines the following: v' ;• A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the }` time and manner prescribed by law, recommends that �• Community Plan text amendment hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this Community Plar text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Commmi+v Plan text amendment is consistent with t s Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucmonga. D. This Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The Community Plan text of the Terra Vista Planned (oamun y, Part V, Section 'Office and Commercial Development Standards', commencing on Page V -20, is hereby amended to read as follows: Office and Commercial Development Standards General to All Office and Commercial Areas o Uses not peMtted within the Planned Community: (a) Massage Parlors (b) •Adult' Movie Theaters (c) 'Adult" Bookstores i� 'i M CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE'NO. RE: TVCPA,88.01 ' Page 2 _ { 0 shopping'.Centerx. To ensure that the goals and c pollwie� of OUTmmenaral Ilan and Caarnity Plan are implemented, a•Cond(tional Use Permit shall be required for i oppl centers.,. In such a review, Life following chrt at shall be considered: (a) The transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mittOOaato cammersial activities such as lading, lighting, and trash clillection., (b) no center has been planned as a group of organized wnes and structures; (c) The center is designed with one thams, with buildings and landscaping consistent with design (similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme); (d) The center makes provisions for consistent maintenance, reciprocal access and RCiprocal parking; (e) Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive system; and (f) The development or approval of any portion of a center shall require the development of a conceptual development plim which shall consider such things as, but not limited to, circulation, uniform architectural design, drainage /grading, buffers, phased improvemu and landscaping. Uses Permitted in Areas Designated "CC' The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Retail businesses, such as, but not limited to: Department stores Showroom/catalogue stores Outlet or off -price stores Variety stores Import stores Grocery stores 5 Delicatessens Bakeries and other specialty food stores t Nine and liquor stores Drug stores x Clothing stores 1,1? I I L CITY COUNrIL ORDINANCE NO.". +r RE: TYCPA 88-01- Page 3 Shoe stores Jewelry stores Beak stores Record stores Electronics equipment stores Radio /TV /stereo stores Photo equiaarent s:ores Funliture stores Mallcoverings, stores' Lighting stores Pet stores Hardware stores Sporting goods stores Plant stores Toy stores Gift shops Service businesses, including but not limited to: Travel agencies Beauty parlors and barbers Printers Dry cleaners and laundries Photo and art studios or galleries Locksmiths Administrative and professional offices, including but not limited to: Real estate trokers Insurance agents Optometrists Tax preparation services Legal or accounting offices Medical or dental offices Admiuistrative offices Employment agencies Escrow companies Banks and other financial 1nstltut'ons Eating and Irinking establishments Commercial recreation and entertainment, including but not limited to: Movie theaters Health clubs and spas Sisic or dance studios Facilities for the performing arts Automobile ousinesses limited to the following: v44 =Y,w,FIf•:: *Tip; -_ ... - fNw' �`fl`JS•'.��i Y' +l� 7•+`; CITY COUNCIL' C4IaN KE NO. RE: TVCPA 88-01, Page 4 d Service stations and car washes (CUP) ; Auto parts stores • Auto sales and service businesses affiliated with a department store or sim!lar concern (CUP) sl, Community facilities as specified above Hotels and motels (CUP) Wholesale businesses (CUP) Swopping centers subject to provisions as specified above Accessory structure and uses necessary or customa' incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning CoamissJ•m . ". be consistent with the spirit and intent of this )And doe classificaticn Uses Permitted in Areas Designated 'C" The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Retail businesses, such as, but not limited to: Home improvement centers Furniture stores Carpet and flooring stores Paint and wallcoverings stores Lighting stores Radio /TV /stereo stores Musical Instrument stores Home furnishings and accessorie: stores Showroum /catalogue stores Import stores Outlet cr off -price stores Electronic equipment stores Telephone stores Auto parts stores Nurseries and garden supply stores Plant stores Home appliance stores Plumbing supply stores Service businesses (or sales- and - service businesses), _ including but not limited to: Interior designers r4 Landscape architects w ' - Pool and Gpa installers - Cabinetmakers and other contractors rts;3 M; rayW �f�'. , - ♦ ���uLf.�l�� `,C..� �3+ ?''f 'i:y.« .. ° � frS'�` w�r•.a _.f .aerdt,; �J 'SJ.: �,t T •'`rb��.�'.syti.,,j�'�y2- f� CITY COUNCIL ORDIHANCE'N0 RE: TYCPA 80-01 =t Page 5 _• .5 Locksmiths Home security analysts _ Equipment rental Home appliance repa:men Wholesale businesses dealingg in products related to home decoration, furnishing, or. improvement (CUP) Retail, service, or wholesale businesses other than the above, not related to home decoration, furnishing, or improvement, but not to exceed 25% of total building area and only if approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to a CUP Eating and drinking establishment, (CUP) Banking and other financial institutions (CUP) Automobile service stations (CUP) Community facilities as specified above Shop ing centers subject to provisions as specified above (CUP) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted to Areas Designated 'OP" The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Administrative offices Professional offices, including but not limited to such professions 1s: Accounting Law Insura,:ce Architecture Engineering Medicine Dentistry Real estate ` Financial brokerage : -; Securities brokerage f 'x.10 �; Y ` �= CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0: ` % RE: TYCPA 88.01 " "• Page 6 we -%I Institutional and governmental uses Retail and service businesses serving the needs of office users, including but not limited to: Printers Stationers Secretarial services Commercial recreation facilities compatible with office use, including but not limited to: Health clubs or gyms (CUP) Racquetball courts (CUP) Banks and other financial institutions Eating and drinking establishments Automobile service stations (CUP) Community facilities as specified above Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Commmission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Areas Designated "RC" The following general categories of uses shall be pvmitted: Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities, Including but not limited to: Health clubs, gyms, spas Racquetball clubs Dcnce studios Karate or yoga studios Shimming pools Tennis courts Batting cages (CUP) Trampolines (CUP) Miniature golf (CUP) Video arcades (CUPI Bowling alleys Skating rinks Retail and service businesses oriented to active recreation, including but not limited to: CITY COUNCIL,OADINANCE NO.' V_:. RE: TVCPA 88-01 Jra t Page 7 Bicycle'rental, repair, and sales Skate rental Kite shop £� Sports equipment rental "kv Sportswear sales Sporting goods store Pro shop r Eatinp and drinking establishments, including but not lim ed to: Sidewalk cafes Coffee houses Frozen yogurt or ice cream parlors ' Snack bars or kiosks Specialty retail ar' service businesses, including but " not limited to: +y Art galleries and studios, indoor or outdoor Crafts and hobbies shops ii Flower shops Health food stores Gift shops Public or private facilities for the performing arts, Indoor or outdoor including but not limited to: _ittle theater Amphitheater Outdoor assembly or performing arts area Grocery stores, general, convenience, and /or specialty (CUP) Consinity facilities as specified abova Shopping centers subject to prosisians as specified above (CUP 1 Accessory structures and uses necessary or custosarily incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Areas Designated "NC" c The following general categories of uses shall be :! permitted: �. Retail businesses, including but not limited to:`,' i 11A ill ihip_ G M a CITY COURCII RE: TVCPA Page 8 J+ MEAD. Grocery stores Delicatessens Bakeries and other specialty food star Drug stores Clothing stores Variety stores Hardware stores Plant stores Gift shops Service businesses, including but not limited to: Beauty parlors and barbers Printers Dry cleaners and laundries Travel agencies Locksmiths Administrative and professional offices Restaurants (other than fast food), including incidenUl serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment or %lancing Banks and other financial institutions Commercial recreation facilities, including but not limited to health clubs and studios (CUP) h:tomob'le service stations (CUP) Convenience markets (CUP) Fast -food restaurants (Clip) Wine and 1lquar stores (CUP) Restaurants with eitertalnment and /or serving of alcoholic beverages Community facilities as specified above, including institutional and governmental uses Shopping centers subject to Provisions as specified above (CUP) Arcessory structures end uses necessary or r-istomarily incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Commissio,• to be consistent with the spirit and intent cf this lan3 use classification i W -AM e�• = Y V. V CITY COUNCIi RE: TYCPA Page 9 Z 3+ NANCE N0. —vI V df EE fit! Uses Permitted in Areas Designated 'MFC' The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: su <y Residential uses as permitted in High Density and Medium ` High Density residential areas r Retail businesses K " Restaurants S� Administrative and professional offices ' Service businesses " Institutional and governmental uses `I Autcoobile service stations Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities Comunity facilities as specified above Accessory strictures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Areas Designated 'MHO' The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Residential uses as permitted as High Density and Medium High Density residential uses Hospitals, clinics, and other medical uses Medical offices Other uses accessory or related to the above including but not limited to: Retail businesses Administrative and professional offices Sa vita businesses Restau. ants r Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities Community facilities as specified above —vI V df W 4 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE 110. RE: T1'CPA 88.01 Page 10 Accessory structures 'Ad uses necessary or customarily incidental to the a; ve Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent• of this land use classification •ses Permitted in Areas Designated 4MV The following ^eneral c:Ntegortes of uses shall be permitted Residential uses as permitted in Nigh Density, Kedium Nigh Density, and Medium Density residential uses Administrative and professional offices Automotive sales and service businesses Automotive service stations and car washes Cvmunity facilities as specified above Accessory facilities and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Site Development Standards for Office and Commercial Uses Building site area, site width, and site depth: No miniram subJect to Development Review process. Building site coverage: No maximum:. Building setbacks: As indicated in Table V -5. Parking setbacks: As indicated in Table V -5. Nall setbacks: As indicated to Table V -5. Building height: For areas designated "Ma: 40 feet maximum. For other areas: No maximum. Building separation: As permitted by the Uniform Building Code. i a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date* March 2, 19BB To: City Council and City Manager fF Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rougeau, City Traffic Engineer Subject: Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment U41B - City of Rancho Cucamonga - A request to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the purpose of accomplishing the following chango: The realignment of Hillside Road to replace the double intersection of Hillside Road and Amethyst Avenue with a single intersection at Amethyst Avenue and a reverse curve to future Klusman Avenue. RECOPM BATIOM: It is rticommended that the City Council receive public input rega ^ding this proposal and, if deemed appropriate, approve the amendment to the City General Plan. A Resolution is attached providing for such an approval. BACKGROW /ANALYSIS• At the City Council meeting of December 2, 1987, the Council approved the concept for Hillside Road of and directed staff to prepare a General Plan Circulation Element Amendment. On January 27, 1988, the City Planning Commission approved Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 88 -01B, the Realignment of Hillside Road at Amethyst Avenue. The present traffic volume on Hillside Road east of Amethyst Avenue is 1000 vehicles per day (vpd) and to the west 1650 vpd. Traffic volume on Hillside Road is expected to increase to between 3000 and 5000 vehicles per day. Hillside Road functions as a two lane collector road from the West City Limits to Haven Avenue. It also collects traffic from the residential areas to the north that desire to travel east or west. The land usage is primarily residential along its length and it serves as a route to Heritage Community Park. � Iu CCSR Re: Hillside Road March 2, 1988 Page 2 A standard 4- legged intersection is usually more appropriate for public use in a collector street that is 3.4 miles in length than one that has tee - intersections 255 feet apart. The present condition requires through traffic on Hillside Road to merge with traffic on Amethyst Avenue for that 255 feet. The criteria used for locating the proposed alignment between Amethyst Avenue and proposed Klusman Avenue follows: 1. The City has ppldns to widen Hillside Road from Archibald Avenue to immediately east of the proposed realignment; 2. If the realignment is extended east of proposed Klusman Avenue, very long triangular shaped lots would result; 3. An adequate design speed of 30 MPH for the reverse :urve alignment can be provided; and 4. There 1s no public benefit to extend the realignment, to the east of proposed Klusman Avenue. At the public hearing held by the Planning Commission, several residents stated their disagreement with th+ proposed change and indicated that they favored no change in the Hillside Road alignment. Also, a representative for the proposed development at the northeast corner of Hillside Road and Amethyst Avenue stated strong disagreement with the proposed realignment. The Commission, following the Public Hearing, found the proposed change to Hillside Road to serve the public interest and approved the amendment. Respectf 1 ubmitted, RHM:PAR:pam Attachment Ali i do I�t s� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 27, 1980 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY Paul A. Rougeau, City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 88 -018 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - A request to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the purpose of accomplishing the following change: The realignment of Hillside Road to replace the double intersection of Hillside Road and Amethyst Avenue with a single intersection at Amethyst Avenue and a reverse - curve to future Klusmen Avenue. I. BACKGROUhO: At the City Council meeting of December 2, 1987, the ounc approved the concept for Hillside Road realignment and directed staff to prepare a General Plan Circulation Element Amendment. The proposed Hillside alignment wall provide a design speed of 30 MPH and will eliminate Hillside through traffic from traveling on Amethyst. Construction will occur in the future when the surrounding land is developed. II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed an Environmental Assessment of e proposed amendment and has determined that there will be no significant environmental impacts. Part I of the Initial Study is attached for your review. II1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission receive PUD11C input regarding this proposal and, if deemed appropriate, recommend approval of the amendment to the City Council. A Resolution is attached providing for such a recommendation. Res 1 bmitted, t ussell aguire ngineer RJM:PAR:pam Attachments: Resolution and Environmental Review Application Fxisting Mag of tpe FIrculaticn ��emenj roTose p emen Hillside Road Realignment Map 2 �$ ITEM N i C�.3CAM24, c'0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW � APPLICATION _ - ' INITIAL STUDY - PART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part Il of the initial study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The riroject will have no significant environmental imp,.,t and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: 1 -6 -88 rroject Title: _ General Plan Amendment 80 -018 Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone:_ City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 ' Ranrhn ruramnnna fa 01790 l71d1 00.0 10.69 Name, 'dress, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project:_ Paul A. Rounean. city Traffic Engine". of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 (714) 989-1862 Location of Project: City of Rancho Cucamonga Hillside Road at and east of Amethyst Assessor's Parcet No.: 106I- 551 -01 List other permits necessary from local regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: None 2I9 ��,.. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - Proposed use or proposed project:_ General Plan Amendment to change the allnnn. nt of Hilleide Rnad at and Pact of AmpthSct Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: N/A ti Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information on topography, soil stab y, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, p„ historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary ,{ sheets): N/A - No construction will take place until develoomen't occurs b Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact No construction promo ei at tht r/ p ion of N/lleidn Rnad mill P e ally hp rPplArpd hX an improved 11Dnn.nt � r ■ WILL THIS PROJECT: YES RO si 1. Create a substantial change to ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce 1' vibration or glare? S.- 77 _ s� 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal {•. services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes to the existing Zoning or General >: Plan designations? X _ f n S. Remove any existing trees? How many? 1_ X _ 6. Create the need for use or dlspozal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flacmables or explosives? _ X Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): General Plan Circulation Element chance 1s Proposed. One (1) Eucalyptus tree will be affected by the parkway of the proposed alignment 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily:_. N/A 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: No new trips will be generated by the realignment 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting ane filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: N/A 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the fa(ia on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and informatioi presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: 1 -6 -88 Signature Paul A. Rou au Title City Traffic Engineer 14 .Z Mt: =fix 1 �fy. k'r .. .,may :%,._.i.t• '.fie aY1"�."�j y:o.. rs.� wt.� ✓ ;.:ef... y:a'.. ..."i Pax r � "],,�,t°'�9`y�i•�i` Y P` y3 • .. ` 'Y W -1 RESIDENTIAL'CONSTRUCTION ,.t> r, •' Tho following infovaation should be provided to the City of Rancho.Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district An assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential deveiopment. Developers are der required to secure letters 'from the school district for accommodatinq the Y; increased number of students prior to iss•j4nce of building parmits. k Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: - li' n i ;' PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 P4ASE 4 TOTAL y- 1. Number of single family units: s 2. Number of multiple r family units: 3. Date proposed to Y 1 begin construction: _ 4. Earliest date of occupancy: ' Model# and f of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range RESOLUTION 110. 88-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO HE ADOPTED CIRCULATION EL&ZuT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAI PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City COuncfi has activated the optional General Plan Amendment cycle; and WHEREAS, the planning Comtfssion had held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Pian Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comission doos hereby recowend that the City Council approve the following Amendment to the circulation element of the General Plan. SECTION 1: Figure III -3 shall be amended to reflect the following changes: The double intersection of Hillside Road and Amethyst Street be" -` •- ' eiminiated and replaced by a single intersection and a reverse curve between Amethyst Avenue and proposed Klusman Avenue. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY 3F JANUARY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca=nga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of January, 1988. by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES- COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS- 1 NONE BLAKESLEY i AMDATIT Of ILLUMU 1• f��' "' "' 4 /'I�� . nail clerk for the city of Rancho Cacarocp, do horsy swear that on /7 -- , 1lSpat amoziaately lh-,6 *'clock Q/}?. (a•n. or t.n.), 2 481100site4 in the Cacamoup rraeeh of the United Stab. test Office located at %07 gaaioaoa- Center Deis *, A letter addrnad to and raprdiag CISY COUNCIL MEETING 3-2 -88 B 7:30 p.m. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AV0 GENERAL FLAN AMENDMENT 88 -0;0 • CITY CF NANCI.O CUCAMONGA See Attached list for names and addrestls �- Biped:,����..J Date: (return to 's Office afer, signing) 1 �'' any `.. •°'`` r7A6 AND MAGI EAENS _ DONALD,AND JOYCE DAVENPORT 6u HILLSIDE 5515 AMETHYST STREET ANCHO CUC,MONGA, CA 91701 - RANCHO CU.- ;XlrGA, CA 91T30 RIVERA 6 PRANK MACIAS 'AMETHYST STREET NO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 GERALD AND MILLIE MILLER 5433 AHETNYST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 D AND RSONDA VEST HTLL9IDE ROAD 0 CUCAMONGA. CA 91TO1 L McNEAL 6 LORI SRETL/JLD 0. BOA 560 HIND SPRINGS, CA 92382 AND RUTH SMITH VALLEY VIEW STRM 0 CUCAMIDGA, CA 91730 NOTE RCOTH A ROBERT BOYD 9480 HILLSIDE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 ViY AND SANDRA SPALLINO i23 MALACHITE AVENUE 0CHO CUCAMONGA, 'A 91701 GEORGE BUSKIRK t SYLVIA COLANTO 5535 AIMMST STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 RICNAPD AND SVERI DAmm 9525 DANGER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 ROBERT ANO LI:._IAN• ^.D_'L;, 5505 AMETHYST , RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA •,I1'O1„ IRTERNATIORAL CIT'Y'BANK 780A C Avzn3 BANK OF AMERICA. NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION 615 SOUTH PLOWER STRM, TIN r, L03 ANGELS, CA DUAYRE AND CAROLS BLISS JAMES AND PATRICIA NA)M7 ER 5423 AMETHYST 5507 MAL1CHI E A.'ERUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 LOUIS AND PAMELA VACCARO WALTER P. BOUMAN 55212 MALACHITE AVENUE 5536 MALACHITE ..- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 MICHAEL AND LYNN VAUGHN SANDRA E. SRADERG 9493 VALLEY VIEW STREET 9494 HILLSIDE ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91701 NANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 CAREY AND DENISZ VALLEJO EARL AND LYVONNE NAAS 5553 MALACHITE 12204 GRAYSTONE AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91701 NORWALK, CA 90650 Z$ NOTTINGHAM LTD GEORGE AND MARGARET BRIl9ER 3932 DONNING AVE. 5552 MALACHITE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 RANCHO CUCAMCNOA, CA 9101 ATTN: JIM POWERS SPEIGHT ENGINEERING, INC. PETER BRYAN 8301 E FLORENCE AVE., /318 9466 HILLSIDE DOWNEY, CA. 90240 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91701 P 0 BOX 4644 DOENMEY, CA 90241 Z$ NOTICE OF PUi1LIC HARING RANCHO CUCCVCHGD CITY COUNCIL I The Rancho Cucamonga City Council will be holding public hearings at 7 :30 p.m . m. on March 2, 1988 at the Lion's Park Conity Building located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, to consider the following described project(s): a.n.n6 naJZaancnl MV bmnEML Pu M PMMI 06 -vam - ULIT Ur W #U*IV ru at , on eme' n o't a enara an—ior pose of accomplishing the following change: The realignment of Road to replace the double Intersection of Hillside Road and Amethyst with a single intersection at Amethyst Avenue and a reverse curve Amethyst AYen4e and proposed Klusman Avenue. Anyone having concerns or questions on any of the above i;emm are welcome to contact the City Engineering Division at (714) 98!�.lbot or visit the rffices located at 9340 Use Line Road, Unit B. Also, anyone objecting to or in favor of the above, may arpear in person at the above - described aeeting or may s-.dtmit their concerns in writing to the Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to said meeting. Feb -uar 19 1988 Rancho Cucamonga City Council u s a e I am � +7'�� .�.Z. xiiS��Y'�.'+V:`�.�.r$j'":� ",�;.. ., .�-a ,.. y`�; "� rsp� �.v4Y`e, •- tti''�yl RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.1APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ti NO. 88 -OIB A ENDING'•THE'CIRCULATION ELEMENT-OF THE RANCHO CDCAMONGA -GE10W PLAN WHEREAS, the'City Council 'has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all convents on the proposed,General Plan Amendment No. 88 -OiB, f Section 1: Tne Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby makes the .} followinJTrr11WngsT A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of �- the General Plan. _ B. The AmemZ'aent promotes Goals of the Circulation Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. 1 Section 2: The General Plan Circulation Map shall be amended to stiow' new and rev se s Teets as follows: The double inters c0un ci Hilltidc :old and Amethyst Street be eliminattd and replacdd bf• A single intersection and a reverse curve between Auethyst Avenw and prapated Klusman Avenue. Section 3: A Negetiva %zlaration i% hereby adopted based upon the completion an n ngs of '.*, Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, PC IT RESOLVED, tha: the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve General Pisn Amendment 68 -018. A A , , , , f 0110 =coo k p !!�� f f s =�o0 s 0 2 -.)-9 s..... Is i r — , , , , r- , r , , q� �7 y r i 9 m I " o I � I a N ' I °I m I o � _rt•_zuo MALACHITE I � � I I / I / v� n� A C HIUSMAN AVE. i AMETHYST AVE. A a ° 3p N O % i r O O n a 2 N K y 0 0 y L VN • \ N i O S �I xa r N y�j0 w a o z L a i A m µ t�. i" CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 w TO: City Council and City M,.nager I FRQM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Amending Map, Tract No. '13058, located in the Victoria Planned Cotmwnity, sutwitted by Pulte Home Corporation; a Michigan Corporation RECOMEMDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt th, attached resolution _ approving Amending Map, Tract No. 13058, and auth�,Izing the City C1erY. to cause said map to record. Background /Analysts Tract No. 13058, located south of Highland Avenue, between Fairmont Hay and the Deer Creek Channel, was approved by City Council on August 6, 1986, and recorded on September 5, 1986. Changes in the lot lines, of the map, were approved at Design Review on October 28, 1987. The developer, Pulte Homes Corporation; a Michigan Corporation, is submitting the amended map at this time. Respec s�1}}yy'submitted. � L RHM: : sd 2 3\ Y f iy� 9, .• vii "k� H RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC1;0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING MAP TRACT NO. 13058 WHEREAS, the Amending Map of Tract No. 13058, consisting of 201 lots, submitted by Pulte Home Corporation, a Michigan Corporation, Subdivider, = located south of Highland Avenue between Fairmont May and the Deer Creek - Channel, has been submitted to t ;e City of Rancho Cecamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and - WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated a? thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. a3l-l- �J �' -- �'•�: r:J.^ ate%' �a,�. <.�. -.'. :.[. _ `:*I: �. -X'o.N Tg• .e -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOAr «'� y STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide , SUBJECT: ORDERING THE PARK IN CONNECTICN WITH ANNEXATION NO. -10 FOR PARCEL PAP NO. 11236, LOCATED BETWEEN LAUREL STREET AND SPRUCE AVENUE, NORTH OF RED OAK STREET, TO STREET LIGHTING MAIATENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 4 RECOMMENDATION: - `; It 1s recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution i, ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 10 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Z Attached for Cily Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 10 to Street Lighting Maintenance District V No. 6 for Parcel Map No. 11236, located between Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue, north of Red Oak Street. The developer of the subject project has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution t No. 88 -064. Respect rsgbmitted, RHM:.:sd Attachments ,-,I- : , RESOLUTION NO. g8- J-13 A RESOLUTIOr OF THE CITY CrAINCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG', ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 10 70 STREET LIGHTING IAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 11236 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 3rd day, of February. 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention me. 88 -065 to order the therein described work in connection with Anneyation No. 10 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -065 was dulyy and legally published in the time, form and manner as rer-ired by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resalution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement% was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, -as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file In the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -065, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said codes were duly mailed in the time, form, and canner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamo— ng,. fiat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -065, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by .he Engineer is hereby finally approved; an6- SECIION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e�i poriare hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts Five been occupied. r`>� 23S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annoxation No. 10 for Parcel Map 11236 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon ail lots within said dnvelopments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. _ Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light Improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is an file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and ccst shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specificntions The plans and specifications for street lighting have been p.epared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions oil approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. Tho plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said 71ans and specifics we -e attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. a3(4, -�'t� .���- d;��a` - - - _ . _r. ..._ .,..n•*.v � y9:`�: °.,i 'tea ` _ 1 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will bi incurred for street lighting improvement censtruction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. eased on available date, It is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment L purposes x111 be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street 0ghling Maintenance District No. 6 has bean demarcated into , two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improv.mments on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, conduainivas and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit In this zone wilt be assessud as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land to Industrial, commercial and institutional areas derlvas the same benefit, as two assessment units In Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Street Lighting Maintenance District�No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: .( �J7 No, of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YM No. 10 Total 5800L 44 0 44 9500L 2 0 2 *High vressure Sodivam Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rote Mots Maint. Cost S800L 44 X S 8.93 X 12 • Sa, ?15.04 95ML 2 X $10.16 X 12 243.84 Total Annual Maint. Cost $4,958.88 2 Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 349 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 6 Total Assessment Units 355 .( �J7 fi• i ■•. 3, rest per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost S4.958 88 513.97 /year /unit o. of n s in District " Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6, x SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed'Assessment Diagrams are attached to 0 s report �,d labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 64, Annexation No. W. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the nistrict and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units ,u'e based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per, net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolut'on of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Mty, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year to June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 23$' -a ' _ .-± -�T"•r- y.ti'ti {jy�i`+,J� x:.J. _ .- e._r:+„u,,y r.ry :' - _ e~'�' -: .r' - - _ '.`t�: ^�:� "�%cf.;,'?� 4�} .. _ Vii"= '"r_;°'�•";`<''�S ww w EXHIBIT 'A• 'µ Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No._ 10 to Street Lighting maintenance District 6: Assess. No, of L s to be Annexed Project Acreage -�Onii t Z/ bWL PH 11236 Pei 1 1.20 2.4 - -- - -- -•- - -- - -- Pct 2 1.82 3_6 _ _ _ ! Total 3.02 6.0 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 23ct 4, 41. W, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO. 10 /lavrr C4 0P� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN MNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA - N im MR x Y I �i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIAONGA STAFF REPORT March 2, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ORDERING THE WORK, IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION No. 25 FOR TRACT NO. 13275, LOCATED 1,200' EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTEONCE DISTRICT NO. 2 KCNRlCK11 J IM; -. It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 25 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROLWD /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 25 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for Tract No. 13275, located 1,200' east of Haven Avenue, north side of Highland Avenup. The developer of the subject tract has been notified of the publ'c hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -062 Respectf submitted, 5 RN�S :sd Attachments 2y1 w RESOLUTION NO. gg" I1Lg A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 25 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13275 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did or, the 3rd day of February, 1988, adopt Its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -063 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 25 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -063 was duly and legally published in the Lice, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement•, was duly and legally posted in the time, orm, manner, location, and number as required by law, _as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office bf the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described In said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -063, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contempi. a. work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council ha '^ now acquir .: ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -063, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a� SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracFa—ve been occupied. W9 ;Zq ;I, I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 25 for Tract No. 13275 a- SECTION 1. Authority for Report s; This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets ad Highways Code, State of A California (Landscaping and Lighting „R of 1472). v, SECTION 2. General Description r~ This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect- - p. upon all lots within said developments wel ds on the lots directly abutting the street lights. — x. f Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: C The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagrem for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or r ?placement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 2q a SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting lsyrovement construction. All ixprovements will be constructed by developers.--8aied on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments .rill be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting 4aintenance District No. 2 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements'on mayor streets for residential improvements (single family; multi�faeily; condominirms and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one'sssessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional protects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the sane benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is shown below: — 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 25 Total 5800L 1,261 3 1,264 9500L 4 0 4 +High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Ho's Maint. Cost SROOL 1,264 X f 8.93 X 12 $135,450.24 9500L 4 X $10.16 X 12 487.68 Total Annual Maint. Cost $135,937.92 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units Wore this annexation • 4,651 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 - 145 Total Assessment Units 4,796 r' ,J ;Zyy Vl Z 3, Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost $135 937.92 , $28.34 /year /unit' No. o Units n District — 4.79 +'• Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram :0 Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this ; report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 20, Annexation No. 25. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Irprovements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per..,.. net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention M annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Ever, year in June, the City Council conducts a is hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. i� ays EXHIBIT "A. Properties and improvw-nts to be Included within Annexation,No. 25 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Y' Assess. gs to be Annexed Project Acreage UML LO.LML- ZZ,UUOL 27, lne TR13275 (240 @ .5) 145 3 ... --- --- Total 145 3 --- --- --- Zone 2 ■1-1 1 fvo�+t t ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 ANNEXATION NO. 25 21. CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMON0A \r COUNTY OF 8AN BERNA> RIND ii STA'T'E OF CALIFORNIA N ■ �3. ,r r asolution No. 88 -124 _ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAW Page 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z_ CATION NO. 25 r5A4 CTTy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A � ~' COUNTY OF SAN HERNARDIId0 n ` STATE OF CAl- BORNIA A T 61 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 1 CITY OF RANCHO C0CAhI0NGA STAFF REPORT March 2, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION H0.'42 FOR TRACT NO. 13275, LOCATED 1,200' EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH SIDE OF'HIGHLAMD AVENUE, TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECOOMOATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the' attached resolution- - orderinq the work in connection with, Annexation No. 42 to Landscape Maintenance Uistrict No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 42 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract No. 13275, located 1,200' east of Haven A ^cnue, north side of Highland Avenue. The developer of the subiect tract has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The att, resolution alse approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved -, 4olution Nn. 88.056. Respectfu#ig submitted. 7 :sd Attachments 2yg . V Fes. `[y 1,-'. -{✓! {C RESOLUTION NG. p S ^!:.S - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDNGI ORDERING THE UORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 42 TO LA9DSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND - ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13275 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rcncho Cucamonga did on the 3rd day of February, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -057 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 42 to Landsutpe Naintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -057 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on y file in the office of the City Clerk; and r, WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvemento, was duly aid legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office -of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said osolu *.ion of Intention No. 0&•057, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears an the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as dppears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this procceding and concerning the necessity fcr the contemplated work and the benef!ts to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cup mongaihat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation ti the District and the ordering of the work, and said City council hereby order- that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -057 be done ane made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer s sere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of asses smen n 'a ngineerIs Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments stall not begin untTT af'te� 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. rc' � /ay9 1 CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for _ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 42 for Tract No. 13275 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2, general Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upor all lots within Tract 13275 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. _ SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the devrlopment and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the sane extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All imprstements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost far Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Including Annexation No. 42 is as follows: Existing Annex New District Nn. 42 Total Landscape Area 920,152 0 920,152 No. of 0. U. 9,403 145 9,548 aso 1 Per Lot Annual Assessment 920,152 ,6.30 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion io the maintenance district but will be maintained by- an active homeomers association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION S. Assessr_nt Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled `Exhibit A', by this reference the diagram is hereby Incorporated- within the text of this report. SECTION 6. A ^sessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general 'benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit:" Where there is more than one dw^tling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3 City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Hay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. E} ■ Properties and laprovements_to be Included within Annexation No. 1 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 42: MAINTAINED AREA TRACT ASSESS 3iiiEET - TURF GROUND COVER —�� SAFE. — E. 13475 ( 290 @ .5) 145 __. i�' t <c w'x'4 :n s i■ I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 4Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi*v1ONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION bl +n�5 VICINITY MAP i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w STAFF REPORT K DATE: March 2, 1468 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: R:sselt H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, "Junior Engineering Aide SU3JECT: ORDERING THE,WORK,IN CONNECTION VITN•ANNE%AIICM NO. 14 FOR PARCEL MAP, 11236, LOCATED-BETHEEN LAUREL STREET ANO SPRUCE AVENUE, NORTH OF RED OAK STREET,,TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 r RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution-' ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 14 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS ' Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 14 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Parcel Mdp 11236, located between Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue, north of Red Oak Street. The developer of the subject project has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -058. Respectful) fq6mltted, i - RF44:.IA; sd� Attachments asp i , .m RESOLUTION N0. SS -1 -Alo A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0IGA ORDERING THE WORX IM CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTR:CT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENUINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 11236 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 3rd day of February, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -059 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 14 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -059 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of seld Resolution of Intention, headed •Notice of Improvement•, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described In said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -059, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the Last ma'ling or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in tho office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom end said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed w•-k. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public Interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -059, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resnived that the report filed by the Engineer s ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved 'hat the assessments and method of assessment -in a ngincer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shalt not begin unt a er 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. ass CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 14 For Parcel Map 11236 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is to compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Coca, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Ths City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on _ the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Planr ,nd Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the condition; of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference 1s hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby mach a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median Improvement construction. All improvements will he constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Land .ape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October S. 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin dnd storm drain within the project. This zc,e wilt be assessed on per lot tasis fnr the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stip:'ated in tha Engineer's Report for the formation if the nlstrict as(i Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscapad median islands an Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other mayor oivided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No 14 is as follows. Zone 1 Total estimated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Assessment units, acres Total cost s assessment unit for year and month Existing District $2,070 8 $2070 - 5258.15 /year or $21.56/mo. /lot Existing Annexation New District No. 14 Total 0 0 0 380,573 3.02 380,576 0 x S.30 • S O /year 0 /mo. /acre -- MU,376-- Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel : for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. iQ The City Council rill hold a public hearing in June, to determine the �I actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the- previous fiscal year which•are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events = 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. - r, 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to-the District er abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and _ . — approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. _ -• P ti S�2 a f W+ EXHIBIT 'A' Properties and iaproveaents to be included within Annexation No. 14 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE Parcel Map 11236 pcl 1 1.20 pcl 2 1.82 Total 3.02 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION NO. 1 Area 3• Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 ,t z r 4.1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANMXATION NO. 14 oe� q JA 123fol OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA =0 tl COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD1NO Ns A P-m-u23k STATE OF CALIFORNIA w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAtONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 TO: City council and City Manager " FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING, THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 37 FOR TRACT N0. 13275 AND PARCEL NAP N0. 11236 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RECOMMENDATION' ordering that No. e3Ttto Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Gauncil approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with AnWXAtion No. 37 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No I for the subjectrpro Jncu hav7e been pnotifiedapofothe2publicTheariinglby mail• The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -060. Respect 1y submitted, i A:sd Attachments RESOLUTION N0. $$ — 1;L? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY "AUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PO� "ON SSTTREETNLIOHTING HAINTEHAYCE DISTRICT ANNEXATION OIAND p pEpARCE�THHE FINAL11236 EER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13275 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the orderathe thereinrdescribedawork ins connection ^with l oAnnexationNo. 376toto Street Lighting Maintenanc' District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -OQp wshmmlEyatha Rfftdavtt ofsPublicatiotoaf� said Resolution ofaIntentiond by on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said postedtinnthe time�tform ,,hmanner,Nlocation,Iand number �a wsrequired by law.las posters from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the real proposed to f Intention all Resolutionrof Intention No. 88 -061, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, Form, and manner as required by law. as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file to the WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, concernin9ot a ^ecessitynforntha cent�emplatedtrcorkslidsthe benefitsctodbeg and derived therefrom proposed and said City Council having noa acquired jurisdiction to order SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga mat the public interest and convenience requires the to the hereby annexation thatO the rwork ' as the forthnandfdescr bed�innsaidiResolutionno 1 intention No. 88 -061, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's epor are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trac s ave been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 37 for Tract No. 13275 and Parcel Nap No. 11236 SECTIGN 1. AuthrTtty for Report This report is in compliance witn the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street tights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly" — abutting the street lights. _ Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the 1. district are: 7i The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvemerts on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general oen'ifit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval fir the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. the plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maiitenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. acs 3 V 9 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will he as indicated beloir. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments wilt be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of tha District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional proiects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in Industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units In Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Street Lighting Maintenance District Md. 1 is shown below: 1, S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No, of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 37 Total 5800L 444 0 444 9500L 485 0 485 16,000L 16 0 16 22,000L 4 0 4 27,500L 6 0 6 +High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annlai Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800L 444 X S 8.93 X 12 S 37,579.04 95WL 485 X $10.16 X 12 • 59,131.20 16,ODOL 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,000L 4 X $13.84 X 12 • 664.32 27,500 6 X $15,31 X 12 2,939.52 Total Annual Maint. Cost $112,633.44 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 15,870 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 151 Total Assessment Units 16,021 2cDy 3 + •• • (Y ila"L YY.+'iivv4 ^.�•.� '4iV� •r 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Tots] Annual Maintenance Cost • S112 633.44 57.03 /year /unit, o. o n s n District Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10, Annexation No. 37. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to ail units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. Citv Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to roan a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. f+ !, •�9 r i� 'f ' iinn65 U 4 EXHIBIT "A" ` Properties and Improvements to be included within Annexation No. 37 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1; Project Acreage Zone 1 TR13275 (290 8 .5) Assess. No. of s to be Annexed —UnTi— L _iOUL 145 Zone 2 6, PM 11236 pcl 1 1.20 2.4 pct 2 1_82 3_6 3.02 6.0 Total 151 ."_ :n% r y X4 js ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. J. ANNEXATION NO. 3 7 S/ ~. CPTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ..,_ COUNTY OF BAN BERNARnIN0 L• ti SPATE OF CALEFORNIA v r. ' W v• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3 7 Il.irr, CS U 5 / C,14, f N 1 U vi_ pP� E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi[ONGA P 1 y/ A COUNTY OF SAN BEBNARDINO ..,. e STATE OF CALIFORNIA T Am N CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer 1:114 11 SUBJECT: Review of staffs dental of application for permit to construct drive approach on the southside of Hillside Road, west of Morning Canyon Way, Blakely Residence, 5514 Morning Canyon Way. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council not approve a driva approach for vehicular ingress and egress on the south sids of Hillside Road, west of Morning Canyon Way, adjacent to 5514 Morning Canyon Way. Background /Analysis The homeowner located at 5514 Morning Canyon Way submitted to the Engineering Division an application for a construction permit to construct a drive approach on the south side of Milislde r5Ad ju-t ?St of Morning Canyon Way. After review of th, appli:,rtion o} staff, it ..a, determined that the proposed approach would ue • -i clone to I.• intersection and there is an existing aporom h locater i tha south s4 It v'r:s44- Roa•' at the rear 'at I -.a of 4,, ,ytject property The homeowner, in anticipation of obtaining a permit, constructed a., ar- site driveway that encroa: her on Hillside Ro.rd rignt-of-wa;- I.a homeowner has been directed by staff to remove the existing driveway frua the Hillside public right -of -way. The property owner contends that prior verbal approval was given ay staff Staff members that would have reviewed the proposed d••ive approach with the applicant, do not recall any prior approval. Monte Prescher contacted Mrs. Blakely in December when it was first noticed that a concrete slab had been constructed in the Hillside Right - of -way. Mrs. Blakely was advised that an approach at that location may not be possible, also, that non - vehicular access may be invicated on the recorded Tract map. She advised that the City Engineer, during the Council meeting regarding the block wall, had given verbal approval. ac04 Y O e 2•n1'yai1;:. :�.»;a'u'.4.,5" •jai � .. � .. ... . �- .irc�'4 City Council Staff Rep—t Blakely Residence February 17, 1988 Page 2 _ After some research, Mrs. Blakely was told that 'a drive approach. at, that location would not be Possible, even though access is not restricted on the Tract Map and that the City Enginear 'did not give prior approval. The application was then received and denied. Mr. Blakely contacted the City Engineer and indicated that during discussion in August, 1987 at the counter regarding the block wall, Monte Prescher had verbsily approved the proposed approach. Although Monte Prescher does not- recall -giving verbal approval, it is possible that the rpproach may, have been discussed. However, the applicant.would have been advised to submit an application prior to coaeencing with any work. The driveway located within the Hillside Road right -of -way was constructed without a'permit. The property owner should have obtained a permit Prior to constructing improvements in the right -of -way, w See attached letter advising the property owner that an approach at the proposed location cannot be approved. Respectful) submitted, t i RHMNPL Attachments Y I C(lY OF RANCHO CUCAMOPIDA January 21, 1988 Hr. Carl E. Blakely 5514 Morning Canyon Way Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Y.r. Blakely: rn Gala an 101. ar.em L�a.a.la. acm.la 11710, n141 fIW Ul This letter is to regard to your application of January 12, 1988, for a permit to construct a drive approach on Hillside Road west of Morning Canyon Way. After reviewing the application, a visual inspection was performed at the site. It has been determined that the application cannot be approved for the following reasons: 1. The proposed Chive approach is too close to the intersection of a collector street (Hillside Road). 2. There is exll,ting rear yard access and a drive approach west of the proposed drive approach. In addition, the existing on -site concrete slab encroaches upon City right -of -way. The City rlglt -of -way at that aree on Hillside Road is thirteen feet from the face of the curb. That portion of concrete slab or driveway will have to be removed from the right -of -way within two weeks from receipt of this letter. Understand that if any verbal approvals are given they are tentative until the application is received and a proper review and investigation of the proposed improvement can be conducted. Your application was reviewed by the City Engineer, the Public Works Engineer and other staff members to determine if any tentative approval had been given. To their knowledge, no tentative approval was given. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Monte Prescher Public Works Engineer eve Bland Public Works Inspector SMG:sd c..vvw,� v. Deborah N elvvn Jelhey Kos nrrnn L 5low chahnl eprel ll Pamml Wrlyhl Uwm Al. W."'M a a -7 1 original Poor Qua" X17 sflod tau" Dat & Cart 513kety 5514 Morning Canyon Way Alta Loma, Ca. 91701 Lut 27, Tract 10047 To Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager, Rancho Cucamonga (Re( Jan 21, 1988 merio Drive Approach, Hillside Road) KC City Clerk 511, Again we are requesting to appear before the Rancho Cuca:.ionga City Counc I This time to Beak a variance to construct a driveway apprrach on rilllside road 38' West of Morning Canyon Way A concrete driveway is already In place After our last problem with ebtalning approval for our wail facing .i "1,'de we made sure we r?v-ewea me desired drive access with Monte Prescner Or. Sept 15 ' )87, my rusband and Tom Sanders tour _. 'der) a<-+ed morate P•esc "e- 3bou' the Hi113tde driveway approach a ^: rve C'ty Property conflict After about thirty-five(B)minutes Large Live pri ^(s and plot maps, Mr Prescner assured'ne . y.^ 1^31 we ^... .'oD'P^` ^ jcra,n ^q 3 De^"" µ.M This 11^`11i^• It, ; ^ -eecec to ^ave our ou''der construc' the driveway • - •erne •w,t^ tre t ^ought ;also from `lonte) than 'Ile f,hal driveway °s, ab,^.'ova could DP obtained when the driveway was CVTDie(ed •w— rre too+ a drawing of the propros C access down to City Offices -- r-aj acid —val our request was de•li't) Since then we nave also -e:e'ved a ewer dated Jan 2 i 1988, from the City Engineering --'vision that said that the co'¢'ete slab Dulit to facilitate I-" s'Ce :C'ess has to be remove9 w, I— tW:'weei, s, —> a— we have ^ao a er - P , ^ v,' -. , w ^ ^e ':rr D'Pa °P :oD 71 r 3 C. r: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA „ ? MEMORANDUM DATA February 16, 1988 TO: City Council FROM: Dennis L. Stout Mayor SUBJECT: Telephone Directory /Community Identity I have given a tot of thuught to the recent Council decision to ask the telephone company to recICSSIfy all of the telephone addresses to the directory to Rancho Cucamonga. I believe that this decision was forced upon the Council by erroneous information. There was no necessity to make that decision that night as we were led to bslieve. As a matter of fact, the telephone company is unable to make the change this year. I have also found that, unlike we were told, it is possible to cross reference the community and city numbers by the Information operators. Since this has troubled me for some time and to help me sort this out, I met with Hal Overton of the telephone company. If the Council concurs, we can mitigate the majority of my concerns. I believe that the residents should be given a choice as to how they wish to appear to the directory. This choice should be at no cost to the residents. Mr. Overton agreed that the telephone company could, at their expense, give each resident a choice at no cost as to how their address will be listed. This would be accomplished by sending each phone subscriber a card which they can return if they wish to retain a community listing. The phone company will, at no cost to the resident, honor their request. I believe that rather than force this change an all customers, we should allow democracy to determine the end result. It is my Intention to place this proposal on the City Council Agenda for the first meeting in March. Since community identity is very Important to this City, I have prepared a draft Resolution which I have sent to the Historical Commission to assist in its wording. The essence of the Resolution is to put the City Council on record as recognizing the historical significance of the separate communities. As soon as the Resolution is completed, I will present it to the Council for your consideration. I think the residents should know the Council's position on this issue. DLS:baa - - Y. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1988 � ^MORKS •• +•7 TO: Mayor, Hembera of City council and City Manager FRAM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Kathy Sorenuen, senior Recreation supervisor SUDJECT: Considgration of establishing a scheduling policy for night lighted City parks. (City Council Agenda - March 2, 1988) It is the recommendation of the Park and Recreation commission the current Monday- Friday 10:0o p.m. curfew on night lighted sports fields and sports facilities be continued on a seven day a week basis with a 90 day review. _. 9: tl:•7.1• During the past several years the City has had lighted sports facilities on park land. With the recent opening of Red Hill and w- : -tage Community Parks additional facilities have been 'L,Aed. On January 7, 1987 the City council approved the extension of night lights until lo:oo p.m, with no mention regarding days of the week. After the opening of these twc city parks complaints were received by several departments from nearby residents regarding the brightness of the lights and reasoning on providing these facilities is Rancho Cucamonga. Because of theme complaints, Dill Holley, former Community Services Director, issued a verbal good neighbor practice policy denying the use of lights o:: weekends until such time that requests warranted discussion. Since the issuing of the verbal practice, various departaents have continued to receive complaints but not at the rate received in early fall. Most complaints and inquiries now revolve around why lights are on with no one there: lights that are out of alignment due to the various wind stormsl and obtaining shields to better direct the light. Also during this time, Community Services has turned down several requests for weekend light use. These requests came from local youth sports leagues for tournaments and play - off s, field practice time by youth and adult groups, adult softball organizations for tournaments, and the d -H and Alta Lome Riding Club for horse shows. 27y Hight Light Scheduling Polj.cy March 2, 1980 Paga 2 With the baseball season approaching, the Community Services staff received requests fors Citrus and Alta Loma Little Leagues to ccndurtt gcmes on Saturday evenings. other base ill or anizatLons hav0 requested lights on any available have also reeqquesteci Saturday Aand Sundaydeven 4d liglits clubs o complete horse shows. Notice of these r-egusats were brought before the park ant Recreation Commission at a public hearing on February it,, 1988. Each of thee• organizations had representatives at that hearing. other ligh. using sport groups were also in attendance. At the Commission meeting the following data was issued by staff regarding the currant and proposed requests for field space. Currently there are 661 teams playing in Rancho (` Cucamonga, 357 of these are youth teams and 286 are adult. There are over 10,000 registered participants on these teams. Counting these individuals over seaecnal use of one game and Jone practice n week our total annual usage is over 352,000. However, most youth teams average two practices a week on ` either city 'or school facilities. Currently about 55t of these uses have requested to be under lights. All youth 1e49u02 have reported growth in participation over the last. year. To accommodate this growth leagues have requested weekend lights for games. In 1987 both citrus and Alta Loma Little Leagues held Saturday evening, lighted 5ames. Over the past several years citrus Little League has had lighted Saturday gores at their fields which were located in Vineyard Park (now Red Hill Park). The cityis Adult Softball Program provides participation for s4 teams with a majority of players living in Rancho Cucamonga. This particular program plays on the two softball fields at Refl Hill Community Park. Lights are provided Monday thru Friday evenings with afternoon leagues on Sundays. Community Cervices does not plan on expanding these leagues onto Saturday or Sunday evenings. x'75 Night Lignt scheduling Policy March 2, 1989 Page 7 .., gereral consensus of all the publ c opea'-ars at the Pirk and }screet:on COnxisGion meeting revol•ed nround the feeling that uhe parks were there to be used and be used as much as possiblt to provide oprortunities for participation At the concluelon of the public heartny the Commission recomendad that 'he -urfew remain at 10:00 p m on a seven day a week basis wlth a 90 day review Respectfully aubmlttad, %Robert A 2i0' Aseletah(,C1,% Mannyet RAP KS be ) i' 14 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 2, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Engineering Division Policy - Acceptance of Public Improvements RECOMMENDATION: Approve Engineering Division Policy regarding acceptance of public improvements into the maintained system, bond reductions, utility releases and staging of construction with regard to utility releases. Background /Analysis The attached policy has been in effect for several years although not formally adopted and therefore sriy not be uniformly applied. Sometime ago it was noticed that newly paved streets were being damaged by concrete repairs made after paving, on -site finish grading operatinns, utility repairs, utility lateral installations, etc. At that time two lifts. instituted first alift iwouldwhere be 2/3 pavement mfire] install thickness. nesand eof is larger aggregate and the final lift would be the remaining 1/3 and of a finer aggregate. The final lift would not occur until all on -site grading, improvement repairs and utility repairs were completed. The development on the southeast corner was required to pave in two lifts; however, they raised the manholes to finish grade because of the utility being in service and the developer only wanting to raise them once. Afte; that it wcs determined that that condition was not desirable or acceptable and a policy was implemented to stop the practice. it appears that in some cases the practice is still occurring. Also scmetlme ago, a developer had two tract; where both tracts were to construc• half of t".a same street. It was of public benefit with regard to finish ;induct to place the final pavement lift on the entire street at one time. The developer agreed but requested a bond reduction for the tract that was completed except for the uncapped street. It was recommended to Council and approved. 2-27 Staff Report Engineering Division Policy Karch 2, 1988 Page 2 Since that time developers have been requesting b kinds of reasons. Staff believes the main ranson has reached their bonding capacity. Engineering D policy that a staff recoamendaticn to City Council not be made unless it results in a benefit to the p Respectf submitted, R :sd' Attachments end reductions for all is that the developer ' tvision has adopted the to reduce a bond will , ublic. ;�. - Y- fir— c+yG�.wy �. ` '��.ts •• Y Y � it ` CT � 1 DEVELOPMENT OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENT ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE 1. Acceptance Into the public maintained system A. All improvements must be complete and in compliance with standard specifications, standard drawings, approved plans, corditions of approval, and City policies and acceptable to the City Engineer. 8. When improvements are complete and t' required maintenance bond has been received by the Engineering D' vision, staff will recommend to City Council that the improvements be accepted, notice of completion be filed with County Recorder, performance bonds be released and the maintenance bond be accepted. 2. Reduce performance bond A. The developer at any time during the course of the project when improvements have been completed may approach City Council and request a reduction In the performance bond for remaining improvements to be completed. 8. Staff will not recommend a bond reduction to Council unless it 1s in the public's interest that certain improvements not be completed and all other improvements have been completed and are acceptable. Example: A developer has two adjacent tracts of which one is nearly completed and the other has been started. The tract boundary is the centerline of a dedicated public street to be improved by the developer. Half the street is :o be completed as a condition of one tract and the other half of the utreet is to be completed as a condition of the other tract, the tract that is nearly complete has completed all the improvements and the base paving on the street common to both tracts. All that remains is the final paving on the common street. As previously stated, the other tract is under construction by the same developer. It would be to the public's best interest to final pave the entire common street at one 'ime, therefore staff would recommend a bond reduction to the amount required to complete the final paving on the common street. 3. Occupancy prior to acceptance of public improvements A. The Uniform Building Code has been amended by City Council action to require that the conditions of approval be completed ov bonded for Prior to release of gas and electric utilities. It is understood that it is staff's option to determine when the above conditions have been complied with. Example: A developer of a tract has bonded, as required by the Subdivision Map Act, all off -site improvements which are a condition, a° approval for that tract. Kowever, staff under the provisions of City Code may require all or part of those improvements to be completed prior to release of utilities. The fact that the a�g 12 PAGE 2 s, , improvements are bonded for, as required by the Hap Act, does not necessarily satisfy the City Code requirement. B. Engineering staff may exercise the option of informing the building official that the conditions of City Code, with respect to off -site n improvements, have been complied with. The building official may a; then release utilities if he determines that-all other requirements have been complied with. C. In determining whether or rot utilities should be released, the ' following logic shall be applied: a. If the off -site improvements are not bonded for and there is no other form of approved surety In effect to insure performance, all improvements must be completed prior to Engineering Division approval to release utilities. = b. If the off -site improvements are bonded for or there is_some ' other form of approved surety, then Engineering may approve -, release of utilities provided that: o Public improvements are substantially complete and only clean -up Items remain. o Street name signs have been installed. o Streets are accessible and unobstructed. o Street trees are installed in front of and /or adjacent to the structure(s) where utility releases are requested. c. Items that may remain to be completed: o Final pavement capping and raising of manholes, valves, etc. o Minor P.C.C. repairs ' o Street lights not energized D. Staging of construction a. Prior to base paving, all utilities shall be complete and acceptable except raising of manholes, valves, cleanouts, etc., to finish grade in addition to compaction, grading,' etc. Pursuant to the Standard Specifications, manholes, valves, etc„ shall not be raised to grade prior to paving. However, major concrete vaults may be constructed to finish grade prior to paving. If the serving utility requires that their manholes, valves, etc., be raised to grade prior to release of their utility, then the developer may raise or adjust the facility to existing grade, not finish grade. This will result in the facility being adjusted to grade twice. It is the developer's respcnsibility to weigh the cost of the two adjustments against that of the benefit of receiving utility release. b., Finalr"veroent (capping) shall not occur until ail other on -`sate and oft-siti work, is completed including but not lisilted to: on-site , finish' grading, landscaping, and curb, and iter, sidewalk,. drive -approach and Pavement repairs and* installation of street lights, signs and trees. %; 1. ! r , t: (''` ;ts�i- :y+�.- -�r'rK r_-••trAw _ a �,,.;,,. .,�,. ��= r. ^svu;, s+.�.: �. <r� ACITf OF RANCIIO CJCAMONGA Y _ , .•MEMORANDUM' �_• - DATE: February 19, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council r FROM: Charles J. Buquet II, Councilmember SIBJECT: REALIGNS NT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE On the City Council agenda for March 2, 1989, I have requested the matter of realigning Red Hill Country Club be reconsidered. - If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, feel free to contact me. CJS /dJa cc: Lauren Wasserman Jack Lam Brad Buller ��• L �a