Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/07/06 - Agenda PacketASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. -2 ANNIEXATION NO. 4& I ri Z z ft R I ff IJ I N i3 ft a l l 10 L i• i IS Al mmvaj4s r3 E 20 = ?/9� If Z Y CITY OF RANCHO CIJCA]LONOA I.SZ _ � Y COUNTY OF BAN E MARDINO �• i BTATS OF CAL17ORNIA T I i it ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. *1 ANNEXATION NO. 4& 1 1 a I W 1.J N 4 I 3 a E] LIN= Iskupl 11 Twl. 40001.E ww� AM ATO K YIIfTA1 a W «7 L Ol RANCHO CUCA][ON(3A TY O? SAN MNARDINO TATH OF CALIFORNIA W� tm ' n rEE N 2 e I1� ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM F REET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 4& °"� CITY OF RA2fCH0 CUC/tiI a s`ij COUNTY OE SAN BERN.ARDINO STATE as CALiF'O RNIA b - N d�i^3 ^.n i • RESOLUTION NO. Z� L�'53 yh• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION • N0. 30 TO STREET LIGHTING MkINTE2ANCE DISTRICT N0, 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongyr did on the " 1st day of June, 1988, adopt its Resolution of intention No. 68 -S68 to order the therein described work 1n connection with Annexation No. 30 to Street the then Maintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -358 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by film shown b the Affidavit of Publifcation of said itsolutlon of Intention on and VEREAS, afte• the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said postedtinnthe time ,�tforn,nmanner,llocation,Iand number•aswrequiredaby law,las appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file 1n the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices )f the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -358, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the sane appears on the last mailin8 or as known to the City Clerk of the City mannercas recaularedabylawl, asiappearssfrom the 9, nofileaIn the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council 1 hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No 88 -358, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; anv- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's elf porTare hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent y of said tracts ave been occupied. +iF w tT.5 CITY OF PJWCHO CUCAMON9A Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Naf;itenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 30 for Tract Nos. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 and 13742 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and High s Code. State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 . SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council his determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altos Nap which is on fill with the City Enqineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City — Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 1 , SECTIOA 4. Estimated Costs �+ No costs will b' incurred for street lighting imroveaent •• conctrvl�tton, All -proveeents w4ll be ce,atr.,, ed ry Ipveiopen aasari on avail.uie cats, it is estieateo t•,!s. maintenance cos CS for aasossrea. 'k• purposes will be as Indic ted below, bese costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is coWrlsed of street light improvements on incal streets for residential improvements throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for tha operation of the District. The estimated total cost for Lighting 14intenance District No. 2 is shown below: r 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No, of Laps Lamp Size* Lamps Annex New Larp No 30 Total 580CL 1,358 74 1,432 9500L 4 0 4 *High Pressure Sodium vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lasos Rmte Ho's Maint. Cost 5800L 1,432 X S 8.93 X 12 • $153,453.12 9500L 4 X $10.16 X 12 487.68 Total Annual Maint. Cost • 2153,940.60 2. Total Assessment Units: TIC Assess Units before this annexation • 5,024 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 140 Total Assessment Units 5,164 3. Cost per Assessment Uni•. Total Annual Maintenance Cost SI53�940,80 529,81 /year /unit o. o n s n s c Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. �µ,s ...ya _ -- ._ v.v.._ u:.:0f ^•,�h.:;t:J'e,4r."�''i5s \`. :✓,.. " Y'.� w �.. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams a.-e attached to this report and labeled 'Street LiChting Maintenance District No. 2', Annexation No. 30. These diagrams are hereby incorporated,irithin the text of this report. T- SECTION 6. Assessment ' Improveaents for the District are found to be of general benefit to ,y; all units -within the District and that assessamnt shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage. assessment will be'2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year to May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. i •r .. jn � 8 �A EXHIBIT 'A' Properties•and iwpaverents to be included within Annexation No. 30 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: " f Y Assess. No, of Lanos to be Annexed �S Project Acreage - n-ff— Tw_06[ __ _, nL TR 12650 35 18 - -- .__ _._ ._. r' TR 12650 -4 6 22 it TR 13715 5 - -- - -- -__ _._ __- ii ° TR 13697 47 29 - -_ __- TR 13742 17 5 TOTAL 140 74 - -- ___ - -- _._ r p 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. 30 25 26 V 26 29 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 � 30 " 9 6 7 1 6 1 5 31 �+ 11 15 14 13 12 11 10 0 32 4 3 33 I• s I 11 r6 3 :! 34 � z 34 35 1 �r 3E HILLSIDE ROAD ' CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAYONf3A TR 12(050 COUNTY OF BAN MMNARDINO .; SIMS OF CALVORN'IA - N-- )I ,a J ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM <` STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2. ANNEXATION NO. 30 I ❑ i F1 �- I.c1;41:'i1 ;21••1 4 � :f, 1 •• I , 31 32 .. 26 29 30 3 23 24 25 26 27 33 �� £ i. s 34 , 17 16 15 14 : I 35 22 21 20 19 16 1 35 3 FY = 12 /\ 1 W \2 3 - 4 -- 5 6 LLSIDE ROAD `gy=m CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA tER 12 s`' COUNTY OF SAN HERNARDINO } ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREE'' LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 ANNEXATION NO. 30 iI ,.L.- I "of 1105 I "I fa 10Ix I lobs I ,VI„ I -sJ.rs II .. So SE 2T /+ 3 17 10 s =I i ,�C%�. Y Cr1-Y 01 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 131n97 I COUNTY OF SAN URNARDINO ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6 i N I STREET ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. 30 1 1 1 2 1 - 2 LEWM FWAW#Ni Im 4000" AKAT3 K MWOM Qtr WV S,�pi ; - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA rR COUNTY OF BAN BESNARDINO STATZ 0! CAUMMt A N4i y tN Ir 4 3 N 1 - 2 LEWM FWAW#Ni Im 4000" AKAT3 K MWOM Qtr WV S,�pi ; - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA rR COUNTY OF BAN BESNARDINO STATZ 0! CAUMMt A N4i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING A T IS NC DISTRICT NO. 2 NO' 30 a5AW%m aff OT RANCRO CUCA7LONGA S°j COUNTY 01 SM BESIi.A nAo fff.4TI 01? 0 R 1 `1 j�� 3 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, city Engineer BT: William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer �S 4M SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT FOR CLARIFICATION OF DRAINAGE FEES anN N - amen en o uosec on a Rancho ucamonga Municipal Cede pertaining to the application of storm drainage fees to properties annexed to the Victoria Specific Plan RECOMMEMOATION: Staff recommends that the City Council introduce an Ordinance (first reading) which will clarify the intent of the Municipal Code to collect drainage fees from properties outside the boundaries of the original Victoria Specific Plan as these areas are annexed within the planned communities for the purpose of development design regulation. BACKGROUND: The sections of the Municipal Code which provide fo^ the collection of storm drainage make relief Victoria Specific Plan. This relief was provided in recognition that in lieu of storm drainage fee collections, the facilities within these planned communities would be constructed with development at the developers expense. The city has recently initiated action to annex property to the Victoria Specific Plan primarily for the purpose of management and review of racilitiestneededito accomodate theseesmalleerr areas wilicbeec nstr ctedaas facili ies,1ethetstanda : d drainagenf eand shouldabeapaid much thesna:me s�nthe land were not a part of the planned community area. Therefore, an Ordinance is recommended for first reading which will add a sentence to Subsection 13.08.0408 to clarify that property annexed within a specific planned comrunity, is required to pay a storm drainage fee in a manner similar to other standard property developments. Respec y so ltted, r Attachment .a3S� i i• �r• E ORDINANCE NO. 3 (, 3 AN CUCAMONGA. ORDINANCE CALIFORNIA, AMENDINGLSUBSECTEIONT13 08.0408 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO STORK DRAINAZE FEES lf- R 8 I -4y -THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMINGAgS FOLLOWS: �_ SSectan .SY - -ubsec'tion Lo,08,0100 is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, es o laws: Vista planned CNomm nitysareasborcthe9AssestsmenttDistrictrareas. AllaPlanned local drainage facilities within the assessment district areas have boon facilities constructed. withintheVictoria. However, l o arynand Terra Vi a c staPl annedcioaamunities shall be constructed with development, at the developers expense. The City Engineer shall, in the exercise of his discretion, determine whtcb facilities are to be constructed with a particular development as'a condition of such development. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any property annexed within the Victoria. Caryn or Terra vista planned comnities after, the effective date of chapter drain annexed property pprrior to Such annexation and in effect at the time of development. Ordinance Santisnll cause the Sam t shall publisfhedtwithin fifteen (15) days this least yeo Daily n aReo,rtalifoornia, nand ci general culated in the City of Rancho Cutanonga, California. %H E CITY C. o N c-fc, o f TEt E L'iTy of .ZPrjjc.l+-o cvCAM0,VhA b 6S o f--DA/Pd A s' -Pa //o w s; � ORDINANCE NU- 3 ,P 3 CCU OCARj�OGA,CCALIFCCRNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTION 13 OF 18-0403 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMM4GA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAIRING TO STORM DRAINAGE FEES IT IS FOLLOMSY ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS Section 1. Subsection 13.08.0408 is hereby amended to read, in words and figures as 0 lows: •8•. No fees shall be charged within the Victoria, Caren and Terra Vista planned Community No les areas or the Assessment District areas. Ali planned to lieu of storm drain fee collections, local drainage facilities within the assessment district areas have been completely constructed. However, ecomm The City facilities within the Victoria, Careen' et Teerrrdeveloper's e*1 nse. Th es shall be constructed with develops ent as a condition of such Engineer shall, 1n the exercise ti his discret do within o such the are to be constructed with a particular development development. Notwithstanding the foregoing. any P D Victoria, Caryn or Terra Storm drainefee in entamounttequaletofthe local o this chapter shall Dan drainage area fee applicable to such annexed property prior to such annexation and in effect at the time of development. Section 2. The Cd,Kktohbe publishedtwithinpfifteen (15) a newspaper circulated Ordinance awn cause Cl., t`o o l _R o, alifarnia, after its passage at least once in The Dail Re_�nrt, circulation published within the C1 y �i C in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californla. cr. 7 :t �A N 1T8: July 6, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT )t City Council and City Manager 10MS Beverly A. Authelet, City Clark .4,,r tt Debra J. Adaom, Deputy City Clark IBJECrt CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS FOIL TNS NovsHSEIL 8 1988 ELECTION I .th the nomination period for the Movember 8, 1988 election comsemaing July 18, 88 through August 12, MISS, it is recommended that the City Couacil adopt a .solution calling for the Municipal Election to be held November 8, 1988, for e positions of Mayor, two (2) Council seats, City Clerk and City Trecsurer. Past years, va have established a filing fee to cover costs for the ocessing of a candidate's nomination papers. It is recommended that Couuci16 opt a Resolution establishing and cocfirmingt 8200.00 tiling Tac for the processing of theme nomination papers. The Registrar has established a fan of 6320.00 to cover costs for a candidate's statement to be placed on the ballot. If a candidate vishes to have his /her statement translated into Spanish, the cost vould be an additional 6320.00 plus 625.00 translation fee. you have any questions or cosmants, please do not hesitate to contact me, i/d j e :ached a34 n RESOLUTION No. aa9 / I A ABSOLUTION Or 781 CI7T OOOUCIL O* ^E CITY Or RANCHO CUCAHOMCA. MLIPORNIA. CALTSNO ART OIVIHO NOTICE Or GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE Hh LD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, 782 BYE DAY Or NOVEMBER. 198E POE ME ELECTION Or CERTM 0771MI13 Or ME CITr AS ATAUIRRD BY THE PRO71SIONS Or THE LAWS OR SEE STATIC Or CALIFORNIA RE LATIIM To czNnAL IAW LIT7ES. AND CON30LXDATIM SAID ELECTION WITH 3TATOiIDE GENERAL RLECTION'1O EE EELD'ON'SAID: DATE SIVERLM. -, under the prO,1mC ns,_ of the lass relating to Coastal I" Cities in the State of California, a general municipal election shall be held on Tuesday. Nnvembei 0. 1988 for the election of Municipal Officarst NOW TRERERORE. 783 CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA. CALIFORNIA NOW RESOLVE, DECLARE. DETMU ME AND ORDER AN lOLLOWSt SECTION It That paromat to the requirrents of the lm of the State of California relating to General Lae Cities witbin. said State. there Shall be. and there to hereby called and ordered, held in the City of Rancho Cacamonga. County of Ban Bernardino. State of California. on Tuesday.' the 8th day of November. 1988 a General Municipal. Election of the qualified electors of Said City for the purpose of electing a Mayor of the City of Rancho Cecoonga for fall term of two yeah; two members of the City Council for the fall ten of four years; a City Mark for A fall form of four years; and a City Treasurer for a full tea of four years. SECTION 21 The City of RancLo Cucamonga shall reipbures said County for tarot"• performed when the work to completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill. SECTION 3t The City Clerk of the City of Rancho OuceaOaga is directed to forward without delay to said Hoard of Supervisors and to said Pogistrar of Voters. each a "trifled copy of this Resolution. 'f RESOLUTION NO. 88— vet'JC 5 A RESOLUTION OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OE RANCHO COWONGA. CALIFORNIA. ADOPTINO RDGU;ATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR'ULECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATS AND THE OUSTS OF THE CANDIDATES STA:BMONT FOR THE GENERAL MONICIs..AL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN TEE CITY ON TUESDAY. N07MER 8TH. 1988 WHEREAS, Sectioa 10012 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by ark candidate for a municipal election, including coats of the candidates statement; NW. OHEREFORE. ME CITE COUNCIL OF MI CITr OF RANCHO WCAMNGA. CALIFORNIA. DOLS HEREBY RESOLVE. DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWSt SECTION It Cmersl Provisions, That pursuant to Section 10012 of the Elections Coda of the Stets of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the Coastal Municipal Election to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 8tb. 1988, may prepare a caadidatets statement an an appropriate form provided by the City Clark. Such statement may include the owns, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief descriptian of no more than 200 words of the candidate's education sod qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. Such statement sh -11 not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activit, In partisan political organisations. Such statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed. Such statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until St00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period. SECTION 21 Spanish Lonauaae. A candidate may elect to have said candidate statement translated into Spanish at an additional coat of $320.00 plus a 825.00 translators fee. SECTION 31 Additional Materials, No candidate will be permitted to Include additional materials in the sample ballot package. SECTION 6w payment. The City Mark marinates the total cost of printing, handling, translating. and mailing the candidate's statements filed pursuant to the Elections Code at $320.00 and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance bin or her pro rata share as a condition of having big or her statement included in the voter's pamphlet. Tho City Clerk shall bill each candidate for any coat in excess of the deposit and shall refund within 30 days of the election any unused portion of the deposit. 4✓ V Resolution No., 88-t.e Page 2 s�- �n�;xo Pi1inR Pee, 3it� anco with Section Election C the State of omla, Ci Coanei that •• tandidate datemine of 00 to cover Pal office ohall at t� o! filivg, pay a pas of processing naainstio -Pere. SRCTrON rep 6: Thst tL•e qty Berk ohall pcoeido each candidate or the uodidataT• representative a copy of this Resolution at the tine nominating petitions are issued, 88CrION 7t That ell prevpons tesclntions estahlidhing council policy on payment for candidates statCtemts ace repealed. BRCTTON '81 That thls Renolvtinn -shall apply only to the election to be Geld on November 8th, 1988 and shall than he repealed. n, _ X39 m :I -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: INQUIRY REGARDING ACCESS POLICY FOR HILLSIDE ROAD RECCHMEMORTICM: It is recaanended that City Council not approve the drive. approach at the location shown on the plan submitted with Application for Construction Permit, 8372 Hillside Road. Background /Analysis As stated in Mrs. Raoiroz's letter dated June 24, iMa, an application for the proposed approach was received in mid -May. The permit issuing inspector made a field review and determined that the proposed approach may not be permitted. The existing residence fronts on Hillside Road and has a Hillside Road address; however, the garage faces the local street, Via Serena, and the existing drive approach and access are on Via Serena, The Tract Map was checked to determine if access rights were dedicated on Hillside Road which they were not, The Tract Map was recorded October 16, 1975, prior to incorporation, Mrs. Ramirez was then advised of staff's findings and also advised of City policy regarding the limiting of access to collector and major streets. Mrs. Ramirez, being somewhat persistent as mentioned to he _ letter, wanted to proceed with her plans, r It has always been staff's policy to attempt to find a solution to a resident's request as opposed to a simple denial. As in this case, this often requires additional research, time and discussion, During this attempt, Mrs. Ramirez was advised that if an approach on Hillside Road were approved, it would be necessary to remove the existing approach and driveway (referred to in her letter as 'the existing Thismwouldtresultiilnea single Primary11accessronaHillslder iMrs. Ramirez �y� CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ACCESS POLICY - HILLSIDE ROAD JULY 6, 1988 PAGE 2 did not want to eliminate the existing access and referenced another residence (5487 Sard Street northeast corner of Sard Street and Hillside Road, one block to the east of subject property) where the existing garage was converted and tta drive was not removed. After careful consideration, it was determined that permitting the prop3sed access under the above conditions, although it would be in conformance with City policy, may be viewed as circumventing City policy. Mrs. Ramirez was then advised of this. At that time, Mrs. Ramirez asked if it would be possible to use the existing approach on Hillside (approach adjacent to an existing equestrian easement). After additional researdr, Mrs. Ramirez was advised that use of the existing approach was not limited, that the 12' equestrian easement shown on her plan was actually a 15' equestrian easement and the entire easement was on her property. Also that, although use of the approach is not limited, it would be necessary to check with the Planning Division to determine if the proposed use of the easement would be compatible with the intended use of that easement. Planning staff determined that the proposed use would not be consistent with the City's Development Code which "discourages motor vehicle access" except for service vehicles such as horse trailers, veterinary, horsesmith and hay deliveries (Resolution 81 -93). Also, the Develo ent Code trail standards do not allow for impervious materials to e p ace Tn the equestrian easement which is required by the Development Code between the drive approach and garage. Mrs. Ramirez then requested meetings with the City Engineer and the City Planner where the above restrictions were again discussed and Mrs. Ramirez was advised that In spite of staff's efforts to arrive at a solution it was apparent that the application for the approach would have to be denied. Also, alternatives were discussed at that time, such as adding the playroom where the garage is proposed. Mrs. Ramirez preferred not to alter the proposed plan. Staff had not received a request for the various codes supporting staff's decisions. Copies of codes are available upon request. Pursuant to the California Streets and Highway Code, the City Engineer has the authority to enforce City policy with respect to limiting eccess to public rights -of -way. That code basically states that access can be denied if an olternate access is available that may be considered as safer. This does not imply that all accesses on collectors or larger streets are unsafe or that the proposed approach on Hillside Road is unsafe. In addition to the policy to limit access on collector and major streets, the proposed approach was shown to be located directly adjacent to the existing equestrian approach which resulted in an approach exceeding City Standards and a possible conflict of use between the two approaches. City Standards attempt to maintain a minimum of one car length (20' of CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ACCESS POLICY - HILL"IDE ROAD JULY 6, 19811 s. PAGE 3 vertical curb) between approaches nn collector and larger streets. This minimum increases with respect to use (commercial, industrial, etc.) and street size. Mrs. Ramirez has submitted a revised plan reflecting the minimum 20' between approaches to be Included with h'er letter and considered by City Council. If City Council finds that this revised plan is acceptable, staff recommends that City Council enforce staff's determination that the existing approach and drive be removed if the approach on Hillside Road is approved. t. Respe ful Itted, RHM. :sd ' Attachment I.: _ ava- 0� CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mrs. Cheryl L. Ramires 8362 Hillside goad Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mrs. eamireal rorc om.. eo. w, a.na.a.oe.,v. uw..w ano, mo waitu June 24, 1988 We have received your latter requesting to be placed on the July 6 Council Agenda to rppeal a staff decision. The suttter will be scheduled for the City Council to review at that tina. City Council smeta at 7+30 p.m. at Lion's Park Community Building, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. I am very sorry you have encountered so many difficulties, and triad to find out what rules were applicable to your proposed home addition. Unfortunately, because we are located in sward buildings, in our temporary facilities, it is often difficult to coordinate a unified response to questions. with the addition of our new City Hall, which is now under construction, I think many of these problems will not occur. Based on my experience in Rancho Cucamoaga, I think t is important for you to be aware that, although sow hones do nor have access to Hillside Road', —the access was granted prior to the City's incorporation in Hwesber of 1977.. To my knowledge, the City has consistently maintained a policy of not permitting access to collector streets sine& the City incorporated. I'm sure our Engineering Staff will have nose exact information at the meeting on July 6th. Again, I apologize for the inconveniences you may have suffered. We try vary hard to provide excellent service to our citizens. Unfortunately, sometimes for reasons beyond our control, we simply are unable to coordinate a unified, prompt response to citizen inquiries. X413 OebanhN Rmwn DenwL Smut Minty ring tn,w..,,. 0!ldn 1. 8.q." 11 Pameh 1. Wright Ilalfn M. Weewrmun Nra. Cheryl Raeirea June 24, 1988 page Two, If you have any questions, or would like a Copy of our staff report when it bas been prepared, please contact the City Clarks office. Wa aspect that the report will be available, if you wish a espy of it, on Tuesday, July S, 1988. LNWijl• cc: Brad Buller Russell Naznire City Clark 88 -398 Since lyy,, re6 N. Yaaa aifla� City Manger Zit ... .F- RCt•��:�L.11 Et'4 \'�-• `�4ni. r�Z ln. gwl,�,t,.., s3ba ta.i \s,af ��\ '9vEM OF ,Qf, idol CITY ADMINISTPCUCOPICItCA , JU14 241988 4. = 7�S19titFlul�'I�i�I@L' l,�y�S$ lt. U, u.t.L.•:.C.. CF` 1�a,.o�•.;.:. �.L�- c- c\..t..,°,,,c•c1, t��d, L�.C��._v...>.s� �,�.\. •.c� c— kk- ��c�i• \Iwu�v c.. tom- ,,,.t 4 t I �-• ll� !\k- -t i((vGU- -1.-31 , {{�C�:JV] V..v'r.L' lk _ t.�A-# I. L��t CTC �� \Vi- � 1f���:.W�• \.t• \.� i\C•C` \,•mil. \� C . K c5. Ltd, �\c .� 1�. •-� c,..>: � �ts��. l�u'���(,r -.\ z C\C1 Z r cr C C\ i1 Ci).\Y c A f IP 1 \T���1`l'Y.-1- �•,`�'\�1 ITC -7.. `�V_.`.1 ii\V`A.Y\ C..lt G- w s.K 1 `lam c� c >L Gzcn, s C' t s7 .�S/ -�1 7 R ''•.0 Cam. •�-y` �v..� cXv �3�.`.•.�� � i]TJ,U.�C.r.r��LY� '1'�v. \kt��l` �' it i�.�.•�.z_. `l�, -o..L c,,.�9..,� , o_ .�oS� •, S.� - -�o-�. \lam � �..o..n.: a..si. w,� s�..,t_�. r s �s� Zr,, � Ir 1 b ��--•� �1 \`u t�,,�.c_kr.. v,.-� via- c- �...ti —l`�.� �1W �kIIA%..� �j.iK. LC /cQa. /V C.H,tKYt .i `•'�I HNV KC ' r << J ejL �W �,I�,.�, .y aye sys <r �>�Ib/ :ouNtr ar ear :FARTMENT OF-AGRICULTURV... A.yw • w a«waw:uaulsoiia vuiao•:ma ���� o Iao wm r: a:6) ,u June 14, 1988 f �r S. City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Be= 807 Ranoho Cucamonga, CA 91730 c V: Dear Sir, eb t d; A review of our renords indicate that on July 30, 1b88, the city's appointment of Pamela Wright to the Soil Erosion and Duet 1. Prevention Commission will expire. The term of the appointment .,y was for three years as provided by Sa.,tion 810.0136 of the San =� Bernardino Code. 1, If the city still wishes to have ruprasentatiun on this panel, an appointment should be mode as soon as possible, and the name ehoula be submitted to the Agricultural Commissioner's office. If you have any questions, please fael free to contact our office at (714) 387 -2106. Sincerely, ROGER L BIRDSALL Agricultural CC000mml�ss4loo}ller BY; ALLAH SMITH Agrlcult,,ral Biologist RLD AS:krb ..n R'R•,. rM•S Al6•Rt A R M /y%IIIN.rr.W .;�-q 9 S..4.0 6vpr.Am. .VAIN JOYNOI FM, anA 3A SAM :RAM NIOROAN TN4 o1WU Gil MALWMN 0•RM0uns1 Ou6 JAMta 911401'e6 Fw COVk( A N \V. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA t 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 4 1st and 3rd Wednesdays —1:30 p.m. z? July 6, 1988 • Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road L. Rancho Cucamonga yb•�a i City Councilmembers 9 Dennis L. Stout, Mere. Pamela J. Wright, Merw P-rm ' Deborah N. Brown, cemmeam abee Charles J. Buquet, coverva rmerr Jetrrey King, cmue(wm Lauren M. Wasserman, cfp Mam ie• James Markman, crooAaemo Severly A. Authelet, c+o cr,.a 0 11 Gty Office. 989.1851 Um Pat 980 -3115 ,o city Council Agenda July 61 1986 PACE Alt items submittaA for the City Cemeil Agada met be is ' writing. The deadline for mmbnitting these item to 5100 P.M. oe the 9e4seadey prior to tke meeting, The City Clark's Office receives all ame► item. • A. CUI TO OMIL 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. loll Call Brown , Bu0uat __r stout __ King —., and Wright B. Arwacros.f.n.sBR . rA2xa.g 1. Presentation of commendation for Robert A. Rixso, Assistant City Manager. 2. Announcement of the 1988 Bicentennial Photography Contest winners. 3. Presentation of a proclamation racognisning July as Park and Recreation Month. 4. Presentation of proclamations to Richard Shore and Xsrl Cox recognising tLeir efforts tovards emergency preparedness. C. CONSM CALXNL%R The following Consent Calendar item are expected to be routine and now-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at oes time without discussion. Any item may H removed by a Coumcilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutems May 180 1988 ' 2. Approval of Warracts, Register Mos. 6/15/88, 6/22/88, 1 and 6/29/88, and Payroll ending 6/23/88 for the total amount of 88,052,491.60. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule 10 as of June 27, 1988. 9 f City Council Agenda PAGE y July 6; 1966 2 4. Alcobelic Beverage Application- for On Sale Sear A wins 19 Eating place, China Star RastsuranOp Ara 6 Johnson Yang, 9638 Base Line Road. S. Approval of the appropriation of $40,000 frog Reserves 21 to account nonbbr 01 -4285 -6028 for the paysent of the City's portion of the County Library Renovation. 6. Approval to afopt the declaratim of trust of the ICIL 1 22 lettraeest treat. I RESOLUTION NO. SS-414 23 A UslY HPIDO OF TR - Cm COUNCIL op THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCANONCA, C►LIFOMU, ADOPTING TIC MCLARATION Of TRUST OF I$ INTIAN TIONAL CITY NA1LaMRNr ASSDCIAYION MIP.RNRHI TRUST 7. Approval to appoint officers and agents to accept deeds 24 on behalf of the City (Supereadist Resolution No. 82- 83). RESOLUTION NO. 88-415 25 A RESOLUTI019 OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA. APPOINTINO OFFICRIS AND ACghTS TO ACCIPT DBRDS ON BEHALF OP THE CITY (SUPHRCEDING RESOLUTION NO. 82 -83) S. Approval to summarily vacate an unused City Eusergency 26 Access Eueacnt, located between Haven Avenue and Dakota Avenue, south of Victoria Street. RESOLUTION NO. 68-416 27 A RESOLUTION OF INS CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOECA, CALIFORNIA, SU)MRILY ORDHRIHG THE VACATION OF A CITY HNBRCBNCY ACCESS EASENENr 9. Approval of Parcel Nap 10941 located on the vest side of 38 Lucas Ranch toed, north of Fourth Streets subsitted by Tumor Development. S City Council Agenda July 6, 1988 .bn RESOLUTION 10. 88-417 i I 31 A RESOLUTION O1 TER CITY COOSCP. OP TEE CITY OF RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PAICIL NAP NUMREI 10941 (TENTATIVE PAECRL NO No. 10941) 10. ApprOad of map, execution of Improvement Agreement and 33 Improvement 'Security for Tract Z 18, located on the southeast corner of Rermoea Avenue and Nansanita Drive, admitted by Mayflower- Sayoun, a California Coveral Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 96-418 34 A RESOLUTION OF TRE CITY COUNCIL OF TRE CITY OF EAAC10 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT blown, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13318 11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and 36 Improvement Security for CUP 87 -19 (Phase I) located on the meat aide of Jasper Street, between Lomita Drive and Sierra Vista Street, submitted by Sierra Vista Baptist Church. RESOLUTION MO. 88-419 37 A RESOLUTION Of TSE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCEO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 701 COP 87 -19 (PEASE I) 12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and 39 Improvement Security for DR 87 -529 located at 112434 -- - Fourth Street submitted by Pic "A" Save Distribution Center. RESOLUTION NO. 88-420 40 A RESOLUTION OP TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DE11E1,011MENT REVIEW MO. 87 -52 i a i4+ice' �aa.iNy•�. CK.,y" y +,a rACM x' City Council Agenda �? Z* ♦ o : July 6, 1988 q a 14. Approval to execute Improvement,Agreament and 42 Z Improvement Security for 6:M Hellas* Avenue, subtitled by Laolo Vats. , -, Hf RESOLUTION- N0. 88-421 43 A RESOLUTION OF IQ CITY COUNCIL OF THE ' yyy..+ --- CITY Of RANCHO CuCANONCA, CALrryoUlk, - APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGUEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 6809 RELLMAN f YL/ AVENUE 14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and 45 ?M' Improvement deeurity for Tract 13715, located war of Sapphire Street on the northeast corner of Exeter Court and Jannet Strut, submitted by Walton Management Services, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 88-422 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE i8 CITY OF RANCHO COCANOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMEHT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13715 15. Approval to execute 7mprovemaut Agreement Extension for 48 =_ DR 85 -32, located on the north side of Civic Center �= Drive, east of Utica Avenue, submitted by Forecast s Corporation. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -423 Qy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGIEENENr EEIRMSICN AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 85 -32 16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 50 Tract 10246, located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenee, submitted by Luther Alkbeaeb. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -424 51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPRMMVT ACIENMENT EETENSION ' AND IMPROVEENr SECURITY PON, TRACT 10246 _ Pf r_ Ail - .. ' city council Agenda /Ilw -, July 6, 1988 PAGE 3 Lf 17. Approval, to Clject'all bide-as warespourivo to the � C y for the' *it* lode :rm Z,.:val sad Rapl actabet is lrac➢'.11934p 1.(atsd wet- af-Vibtoria Para; Lens sad uith.of the Soutttm Pacific Railroad in the- Victoria Planned Caimunityp and authorise resdvsrtising of the project to be fundad from Landscape Naieteeanes District No. 2 - Account No. 41 -4130 -8769 with a loan from Beautification Funds.. PESOLLYiof SO. 88 -423, 536. , A RNSOLUTIOf OF TU CITY C00CII. Of TSE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA,- CALTFORNL, APPROVING PLANS AID SPECIFICATIONS FOR INS "WRITS ALDER TEES REMOVAL AID WLACKONTe IN TRACT 11934, LOCA'IND WEST of VICTORIA PARE LANK AND ROM OF THE SOUTURN PACIFIC RAILROAD IN TR VICTORIA PLANING COMMUNITY, IN SAID CITY AND AUT ORIZING AND DIRECTING I= CITY CIXRE TO ADVERTISE TO SMITE BIDS 18. Approval to reject all bide as submitted for the Tryon 54 Street Sidewalks, located war of Archibald Avenue, as , wareapomsive to the needs of the City and authorise readvertLeing of the project to Us funded from Pedestrian Crants /Article 3 - Accent go. 16 -4637 -8717. RESOLUTION NO. 88-426 55A - A RESOLUTION OF TIE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRYON STREET SIDEWALIS, WEST OF ARCHISALD AVRNUt", IN SAID CITY AND AUI &UrNG AND DIRECTING THE CITY CURB TO ADVERTISE TO RECBIVE BIDS .. _ 19. Approval to authorize the advertising of "Notice 56 Inviting Bids" for the Archibald Avon" Widening Project I betwen Highland Avenue and Lenora Avenue to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8736. PACE V; D City Council Assn" 'Y4 53r July 6, 1986 6 ,5 x•~ RESOLUTION NO. 88 -427 57 ' Syt• A RESOLUTION or, Ta CITY COUNCIL OF Ta j �+':� • CITY OF RANCID CUCANONCIA, CALIFORNIA, Cli APPROVING PLANS An SPECIFICATIONS_ pot s> TER "ARCHIBALD AVENUE WIDENING PIOJECr ", IN SAID -CITY AND ADTIOIIZINC AND DIRECTING TVZ'CrrY CLARE TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE ME 20. Approval to 'authorise the advertising of "Notice 61 - Inviting lids" for the Cometrnetion of Grove Avsuuo at " 8th Ctrest and Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fa ' Railroad Crossing Improvement Project, to be funJad from ` • System Development Food, Account No. 22- 4637 -8751 PAU ^ ' Section 203, Account No. 17-46374776, and TDA, Article a ' 8, Account No. 12- 4637 -8783 and TDA, Article 8 - Account No. 12 -46374763. ' RESOLUTION 90. 88-428 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM '• CITY OF UNC20 CUCIMONC:A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND 'SPECIFICATIONS 101 1°!81 CONSTRUCTION OF GRM' AVENUE AT EYE „ STREET AND ATCHISON, SOFEEA A10 TIM BANTA - FE RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENT a PROJECT ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AM DIRECTING THE CITY CLIRK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 21. Approval to award the Sapphire Trails Landscaping and 66 Reconstruction Improvement Project located mouth of Banyan Street, to Joe Hall Construction Company, tncorporated for the amount of $81,596 to be funded from Beautification Fund, Account No. 21^4647 -8723. 22. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -089) for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project at Highland Avenue and Milliken Aveaue, warded to Hovey Electric, Incorporated, for tho amount of $90,000 081,332 plus NOS contingency) to be funded from TDA Article 8 Fund - Account No. 12 -4637 -8708. r r _t i� _ City Council Agenda /141/10 July 6, 1989 RAGE' "V �! 7 -- ` 23. Approval to execute contract (CO 99-090)_ for the 69 ArchibaL! Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II Improvement Project from Foothill loulevard to 6th Strut awarded to 1 -1 Enterprises Corporation for the amount of $37,650.50 to be funded from Pedestrian Crants Article 3, Account No. 16- 4637 -4716. 24. Approval to a:ecuts contract (OD 68 -091) for the Slurry 70 Sul Program, Phase II, FY 87/86 Improvement Project a awarded to Pavement' Coating Company for the amount of 473,100 (866,384.66 plus 101 ecatiaSency) to he funded from SS 300 funds - Account Wa. 15- 4637 -9050. 25. Approval to extent& contract (CO 85 -092) for the 71 Hillside Road Store Drain and Street Improvement Project from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue awarded to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated for the amount of 4475,600 (44321360.90 plus 101 contingency) to be funded from System Development fund, Account No. 22- 4637- 8748 sad City -vide Drainage fund Account No. 23- 4637 -8802. 26. Approval to "acute contract (CO 38 -093) for the Lion 72 9Lreat Improvement Project located between AtchisoA. Topeka and Santa To Railroad and Eintb Street, awarded to J.E.O. Construction Company, Incorporated for the amount of $57,000 (451,747.10 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve Fund, Account No. 25- 4265 -8804. 27. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -094) for the Traffic 73 Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project at Highland Avenue and Etivsnds Avenue, awarded to Sway Electric, Incorporated, for the amount of $102p6D0 093,255 plus 101 contingency) to be funded from TDL Article 8 fwd - Account Ho. 12- 4637 -8707. 28. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -095) for the 74 Construction of Klintenance facility Improvement Prmjaat at Red Hill Community Park awarded to lopark Enterprises, Incorporated, for the amount of 41529900 0139,000 plus 101 contingency) to be funded from Capital Improvement Facilities, TY 81/88 - Account No. 01 -4647 -7043 (FY 87/88). 446�7�1`e City Cnuneil Agenda July 6, 1988 PAGE _. 8 29. Approval_ to execr.te contract (CO 88-096) for the - 75 Stiwada Storm DrUs, Line 2 -1, phase I, Improvement Project located wet of I -15, north of Victoria strut from the Vietorii Basin to north of Highland Avenw 'sod future Route 30 7raway, awarded to Albert Y. Davies, Incorporated, for -the amount of $651,100 ($597,330 plus 101 contingency) to be funded from Drainage Fund - Accouut No. 19- 4637-6154. 30. Approval to execute - Agreement (CO 88 -097) for 76 Installation oC public Improvement and Dedication between Clarke N. loepn and Marjorie C. losses and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for 3treat Frontage Improvement• along 9529 19th Street, located on the south side of 19th Street between Archibald Avon" and Amethyst Street. RESOLUTION NO. SB-429 77 A 1R80LOFION Of TM CITY COUNCIL OF TES CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCeTINC AM ACREgKST FOR INSTALLATION OF PUPLIC IMlIM MINT AND DEDICATION SIGN CLM H. SORSIN AM MA1.IORR C. SORSIM, AND AUTHORIZING INF. MAYOR A31D CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAM 31. Lppproval to execute contract change order No. 5 (CO 81- 78 20) for A professional Services Agreement with Don Creek and Associates to continue design administration for the Alta Loma Assessment District 84 -2. It is recommended to expand their contract by $10,000 to bring their contract total to $29,152. 32. Appproval to exeeuta contract change order No. 3 (00 87- 80 20) for a professional Services Agreement with D,m Creek and Associates to continue design administration - for Banyso Street Rxtenrion. It is reco"ouded to expand their contract by $5,000 to bring their contract total to $18,799,50. 33. Approval to accept improvauents, release bonds and the a Notice of Completion fort Tract 13062, located on the nortb side of 19th Street. 82 between Amethvst and Archibald Avenua. i A i♦ PAGE '1 ,r City Council Agenda July 6, 1988 9 Releases Faithful Perforaumce lend (Street) 8261,000 Accept: Naintananee Guaraatee Bond (Street) 8 16,100 RESOLUTION NO. 38-430 83 A RESOLUTION OF TUC CITY COUNCIL. Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TIM PUBLIC INCROVRIRNIE FOR TRACT \O- 13062 AND AUTIOIIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF ODMFL:TIOY FOR THE WORK DB 86 -14. located on the east side of Haven Avenue. 84 south of Civic Canter Drive. Faithful Parforzanee Bond (Street) 8 2,500 RESOLUTION NO. 88-431 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCZPTIFG ThE PUBLIC IWROVENENTS FOR DR 86 -14 AND AUTHORIZING THE VILIMO OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 12670 -1 thru -4 Icestad south side of Bsee Line 86 Road Fetvnen 9Srure and H 'liken Avenuaa. Releases Faithful Perforursce land (Street) 8829,953 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 8 92,995 RESOLUTION NO. 88-432 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVZM3NT8 FOR TRACT NO$. 12670 -1 THRU -4 AND AUTHORIZING TRe FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORE A i♦ City Council A /ends July 6; i933 PAGE':.". °•� 10 Tercel• lfu BK2. located oe Terra Vista Parkway east of 88 Rerate . Aweoe. Fafthfel Performaee load (Street) $ $2,000 RMOLVTYOV NO. 3B°433 89 A BIBOLUTION OF In CITY Commit. of In CITY Ol lANClO COCIMMA, AIFOSNI, ACCQSINCTO PUBLIC - IQROVXMBNTI FOR PARCIL NAP 8842 ABO ADT101I2INC Tu FILING O'1 A NOTION OF COMPIATION TOIL YR MONK Trott 11577. located eo the wet aide of Re as Avenue 90 a ut of Klee Lino Road. Releases Faithful Parforau:nce Bond (Street) $ 49,000 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4,900 RESOLUTION M0. 13-434 91 A E3SOLUrION OF TEE CITY CODICIL OF I= CITY OF RANCIO COCAMONCA, CALIFOIXIA, ACCVTWG THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TPAGT 11S77 AND AUTUORIZING TIM FILING or A 00TICS Of COMPLXTIOI FOX 7R MOIL Tract 12833._located on the vouthwat cosn•r of ii'-o -ia 92 -or Lana and south of Victoria 9indrove Loon Releaaet Faithful Perforaauce Bond (Street) $649,360 Acceptt Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 64,936 PAGE City council Agenda July 6, 1988 11 RESOLUTION NO. 88-435 I 93 I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or TBE CITY OF "CEO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AC(=PT7Nc TEE PUBLIC Ig1OVININTS FOR T'LCT 12833 AND AVMLIZINC THE FILING or 4 A NOYTCi :V OUWLgTION Vol In AORIL Tweet Noe 10102 ' 1080-1 -2-3-4 n d lo"abd a0 the ' " ^•` -eEat career of Nouataio Viev Drive and Eprud lvneye. Fttuaet A,�e��t . Faithful rarforeance Maintanance Guarantee Tract fond (6traet? _ Fond (BCTeat) 10802 0201,500 020,150 10802 -1 0605,400 060,540 10802 -2 0253,000 025,300 10802 -3 0 77,000 0 7,700 10802 -4 0123,000 012,300 10802 -5 0184,000 018,400 10802 -6 0276,000 027,600 95 RBSOLDIION N0. 88-436 A "SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF LRCYO CUCAMOMC►, GALTFON"IA, ACCjFTIMG THN PUBLIC IMPROVZMEXTS FOIL TILACT MOB. 10802, 10802 -11 10802 -2, 10802 -3, 1090E-0, 10802 -5-, AND 10802 -61 AND AUTNORIZTMC THE FILING OF A NOTICE Or COMPLETION FOIL INS wool 34. Guaranteat Bond ofor iTracta No to 12672, located KBinteneace 96 on the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce - Avenue. Maintenance Guaraotee Bond (Street) 0 4,159 35. Approval for funding frog fund 20 (park development 47 funds) to proceed in cooperation with Engineering, to A I I acquire land (LPN 209-041 -11) isaediataly adjacent and + asst of Rancho Cacaeonge Neighborhood Center for future parking Sot a,ryanaioo. PAGE:,`' City Council Agenda July 60' 1986 12° 36. Approval of a partial release of the Improvement 113 Security.;lor Tract 12870 pertaining to the Victoria I $in and the Etivanda Store Drain, located on the north side of Righlead Avenue, between gtivande and East Avenue@, submitted by AAN Iavaed,eats, a California General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -437 114 A RESOLUTION Or To CIYr COUNCIL OF :Rs CITY Of RANCHO CUCANOHCA, fALI70uIA, APPROVING A PARTIAL RRLEAOE OF THE IMPROVEMENT OECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 (VICTORIA BASTE AMD ETINANDA STOAX DUIH) 37. Approval of $44,D00 to purchase and install radio 115 equipment for the Emergency Operations Center from Motorola Corporation based on the San Bernardino County radio equipment bid contract. 38. Sat public bearing for August 3, 1988 - ENVUONNNNTAL 118 ASSESSayr AND DEVELOPNNNr REVIEW 88 -03 •- SXM - Appeal of the Planiag Commission decision requiring (1) in- lieu fees for utility und@rgroundial and (2) off -site street improvements for the development of a 20 unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium, High Lsidential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), located at the terminuaas of Sierra Madre Avenue and Wo Street - APE 207 - 251 -22. 39. Sat public hearing for August 3, 1968 - Approval of the 121 19th Street Improvements (vest City limits to Jaspor avenue) Environmental Assessment Review. i RESOLUTION NO. SS-438 122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 07 TIM "• - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETIIEC A PUBLIC UZARIMC RAYS ON VEDWESDAY, Al CUST 3, 1980 FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW 40. Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - Approve: of the 124 19tb Street Improvements (Hermosa to Cartilla) Environmental Assessment Review. -, 0 PAGr:� City Coual'16,21988 13.`.A�' 125 NuoLUTION N0. 88^439 A 113OLUTION Ci THS CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY or NANCIo CUCANOICA, CALIX01NiA, PUBLIC BEAMING ArpN MQ AND UTTING a 1936 FOR THE !ROlOt�D�1g9T1Y STRUT ENPINON1aITTIL ASUSSWIT !VIEW 41. Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - Approval to at 127 o(n ermosa and xeaunit to to Street Lighting He District No. 2 se Anaexatioa 1o. 31. 128 tESOLUT2011 N0. 88-440 CITTYY olmWCHO CUCWVGi, CALIFOORNIA,Or Or APPROVAL or NO. T REEPORT OIL A 3 TO STRIT LIGMING MAINTSK"m DISTRICT 10. 2 134 1E Vrl goLor ro. 88-441 A RESOLUTION OF TU CITY COUNCIL Or TUB CITY OP SANGHO CUCAXOVGA, CALIFORNIA, THE DECLARING ITS INTgNTION TO ORDER To STREET LIGHTING 1►INTIMANCE ANNETATIOM DISTRICT 140. 2, AN ASSSBSMSMT DISTRICTS DESIONATINC SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNIZATIGN NO. 31 To STRUT O DISTRICT NO- 2{ICPURSUl11TIN THE LANUSCAPING AND LICHT13G Acl OF 1972 ALLY 0!lBRiBG A The AND PLACE FOR, HEAPING CSJECTIONS THERETO 42. Set public hearing for August 30 1988 - Approval to 13318, Parcol Yip 10941, CUP 87 -19, COP 135 _ Annex Tract 1o. 8742, DR 86 -06, PR 87-41, end DR 67 -52 (various Lighting locations throushout the City) to Street Y.aintenacce District No. 1 as Acoexation No. 47. 136 R6SOLIRION N0. 88-442 A RESOLUTION 07 TIE CITY COUNCIL Or TBE CITT OF RANCHO CUCANWGA, CALIFORNIA. OF Y TRE T so. 4To SR �� 7 REPORT Ar anox LIGHTING IUTIMMAMCX DISTRICT NO. 1 0 ` City Council Agenda era, bar July 6, 1988 PAGE - fi 14 RESOLUTION 30. 88-443 148 A RESOLUTICH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING X&TMTSHANCB DISTRICT 10. 1, AD ASSESSNLNT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS- ANNEXATION LI N0. 47 TO STRGHTING MAINTENANCE ESS DISTRICT 10. IN PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT Of 1972 AHD OFFERING A TIM AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THIRETO 43. Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - Approval to 150 Annex Parcel Nap 10941, DR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 - (Industrial /COwmerciol) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as "-vexation No. 18. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -444 151 A RESOLUTION Of THE Cllr COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S V:PONT FOE AEIREATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING NAIMRANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 86-445 159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O7 THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORD39 THE AMMXATION TO STREET LIGHTING M►INNIEN/mCA DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMET DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING NLIINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE - L41D9CAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AHD PUCE FOR RUBINO OBJECTIONS THERETO 44. Set public burins for August 31 1988 - Approval to 161 Annex Parcel Hap 10941, DR 86-08, DR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /Commercial) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 an Annexation No. 22. oY .t mss: 8 +(yiN� .T 4 sus lS L r'. •'•<'.� PAGE City Council ABenda - i= July 6, 1988 15 "4 ' RESOLUTION NO. 88-446 162 A RESOLUTION Or TIM CITY muri. Or THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANWCk, CALIFORNIA, OF .X° PRELININART APPROVAL Or CITY ENCDOLER'S '- REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 22 TO LUtD3GPE j; M4IMUNCR DTSTRICr NO. 3 ZXSOLUTI= NO. 68-447 170 ;. A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL Or TSE 'r CITY Or .RANCHO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DECIAUwa ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TER ;4 ANNEXATION To LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE "ye DISTRICT N0. 3, W ASSSSSM Nr DISTRICTS • DSSICNATINC SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MATRTREAXCE DIRTRICY ` NO. 31 PURSUANT TO TQ IANNCAPIN0 AND LICRCING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFXRINO A TIME ANC PLACE FOR TNARLNG OSJRCI'TomS THSaXTo 45. Set public hearinz for AuSuut 3, 1958 - Approval to 172 { Amex Tract Noe. 13318, located on th6 southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Nannaaita Drive, to Landscape ; Maintenance District No. 1 as Annuation No. 49. a RESOLUTIOK NO. 88.448 173 A RESOLUTION Or TEN CITY COUNCIL OF TIE r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CaLIroUU, OF PRXLINLIIURY APPROVILL or CITY XNCINAIR•S _ EXPORT FOIL ANNEXATION NO. 49 TO LANDSCAPE NA=UXC9 DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88-449 178 A RESOLUTXCR Or THE CM COUNCIL or THE -• - CITY Or E:XC`O CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTSNTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPR MAIIITRNANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSSSSNENf DISTRICrt DUTCHATING SAID ANNEJTION AS ANNEXATION NO. 49 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCR DISTRICT N0. 18 PURSUANT TO THE LAIDSCAPIHG AND LIGHTING ACT Or 1972 AND CrnRI1I0 A TIM ' AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THRRNTO 3 ^fit x ,x 11 r ti' - VW PAGE City Council Agenda July 6, 1988 16 AN ORDINAMLR OP ffi CITY COUfCIL OF THE I CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Ap!&WINC DRVRLOPWWr DISTRICT AMRMDWWr 88 -01 =QMTIMC TO AMBMD TIM DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MRDIM RXSIDRNTIAL TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDMNI'LAL POI 15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED MOM OF HICRIAMD AVRMUC, SODTD OT LRMUN AVRIIUR EXrzHSIOM, AND WEST OF THE DEER CRSet CHANNEL, RANCHO CUCAMONGA' CALIFORNIA, - APR PORTIONS Of - 201- 271 -34 AIM 41 (SEE EXHIBIT "A ") AND APS 201 - 271-42 2. RMVIROMlLNTAL A56R88MSM AND DEVRLOPYM CODE AMRl7DI�M 88 -04 - CITI OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to section 17.08.u70 -C, 17.12 -030 -a, and the addition of Section 17.10 -050-0 of the Development Coda pertaining to the parkint and storage of vehicles on privute property in the Residential, Comeareial and Industrial Districts. 46. Set public bearing for August 31 1983 - An ordinance to 180 y m end the vesting tentative mep section of the City I T on subdivision ordinance to include the regulati o£ a nonresidential subdivisions. 1 the The following Odinarces yava bad pablic beardwaelate M Reseed an ogee time of first reading. resliags roatiaa and nsm- ewtrevarsial. T1rF' will M acted wpm by the Cowacil at was time without discassiou. The City Clerk I&- will read the title. Any item can be removed for discession. ENVIRONNSNTAL ASBXSSMEMT AND DXVNLOPMRNT DISTRICT 2 - ACACIA OOIISISDCfI011 - A ragwst to Designation of Medium eased the Davalopment District (8 -14 dwelling units par acre) to Low- Modiva Residential Residential (4 -6 dwelling units per acrd) on approximately 15 acres, located at the north ddo of and Higblsnd Avenue, south of Lesson Avanw extension Channel - APM Portions of 201 - 271 -34 rest of Doer Creek and 41, and 201- 271 -42. `r ONDIMAMCB NO. 359 (second reading) 181 AN ORDINAMLR OP ffi CITY COUfCIL OF THE I CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Ap!&WINC DRVRLOPWWr DISTRICT AMRMDWWr 88 -01 =QMTIMC TO AMBMD TIM DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MRDIM RXSIDRNTIAL TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDMNI'LAL POI 15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED MOM OF HICRIAMD AVRMUC, SODTD OT LRMUN AVRIIUR EXrzHSIOM, AND WEST OF THE DEER CRSet CHANNEL, RANCHO CUCAMONGA' CALIFORNIA, - APR PORTIONS Of - 201- 271 -34 AIM 41 (SEE EXHIBIT "A ") AND APS 201 - 271-42 2. RMVIROMlLNTAL A56R88MSM AND DEVRLOPYM CODE AMRl7DI�M 88 -04 - CITI OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to section 17.08.u70 -C, 17.12 -030 -a, and the addition of Section 17.10 -050-0 of the Development Coda pertaining to the parkint and storage of vehicles on privute property in the Residential, Comeareial and Industrial Districts. 4- 4/0 City Council Agenda July 6, 1988 PAGE 17' ORDINANCE NO. 360 (second reeding) 182 AN ORDINANCE Or TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CLLIFMUM, APPROVING DEVELOPMBET CODE ARERDKNT 88- 04, AWNDING SUBSECTION 17.08.070 -C AND 17.12.030 -5, AND ADDING A -NEV SUBSECTION 17.10 -050-0 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO THS PAjR3NG AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES OM PRIVATE PROPRRTy WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL /OFFICE AND INDOBTRIAL DISTRICTS 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSSSSMER AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 85-02 - CIYT OF LNCHO CuCAMOECA - An sasaderat to change Dsveloy snt District desigutions as they currently exist to Victoria Planned Comity (V.P.C.) for sloven arcs within the Victoria Planned Community - APN 227 -011-8 thru 111 227 -091-4, 45, 561 227-411 -751 227 -091-9, 26, 49, 501 -227 - 091 -18 thru 22, 25, 431 227- 111 -1, 33, 381 227 - 171 -191 227•- 161 -10, 24, 25 and 227- 111 -27, 30 end 227- 171 -211 227 - 211 -7, 28, 391 229 -021 -58; 227 - 211 -3, 30 ORDINANCE NO. 361 (second reading) 187 AN ORDINANCE Or TEE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIrOCNIA, APPROVING MRLOPNffR DISTRICT AIENDlLR NO. 88 -02, A REQUEST TO CHARGE DEVELOPKR DISTRICT DlSICNATIOMB AS TEST CURRENTLY EXIST, TO VICTORIA PLANNED COmMUXrrY (9Pc) FOR ELEVEN AREAS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COWUNITY AREA - APR 227 -011 -08 TRIO= Ill 227 - 091 -04, 45, 56; 227 - 411 -751 227 -091 -09, 26, 49, 50; 227- 091 -18 THROUGH 22, 25, 431 227 -111- •- - 01, 33, 38; 227 - 171 -19; 227 - 161 -30, 24, 25; 227- 111 -27, 30; 227 - 171 -21; 227 -211- 07, 28, 39; 229 -021 -581 AND 227 - 211 -03, 30 s%°+1, ee r H� PACE .: City Council Agenda July 6-, 19TH 18 i^ Gny 4. MRVIRONNENIAL ASSESEWNT AND VICTOR7► ptAUMED COMA MTT AMENDMENT 88 -02 - CIYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to annex sleFam •read into the Victoria Planned Community - APN, 227 -011-08 through 11; 227 -091 - 04, 45, 56; 227 - 411 -75; 227 - 091 -09, 26, 49, 501 227 -091- 18 through 22, 25, 43; 227- 111 -01, 33, 38; 227- 171 -191 227 - 161 -10, 24, 251 227 - 111 -27, 301 227 - 171 -21; 227 -211- 07, 28, 391 229 -021 -581 add 227- 211 -03, 30. ORDINANCE 160. 362 (ucood reading) 188 AN ORDINANCE OF TMs CITY COUNCIL OF t>a CITY OP, RANCHO CUCAMOMCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMON /TY AMENDMENT' 88 -02, AN AKNRSNT TO ANNEX ELEVEN (11) ANEAE WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMUNITY AREA TO THE VICTORIA PLANKED COMMUNITY - APR 227 -011 -08 TROUGH 11; 227 -091 -04, 45, 561 227- 411 -75; 227 -091 - 09, 26, 49, 50; 227- 091 -18 THROUGH 22, 25, 43; 227- 111 -01i 33, 361 227 - 171 -191 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25; 227 - 111 -27, 301.227- 171 -211 227- 211 -07, 28, 39; 229 -021 -59; AND 227- 211 -03, 30 R. ADPEQIEED PRLIC 1ARDOE The following items hawa been advertised and /or postal u public Iwringe as required by Ian. The chair will open the mating to receiva public testlaeq. 1. RESIDENTIAL AND COlOERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL RHUSS RATE Igg REVIEW - City Council rill consider a potential rate adjustment for refuse rates for the City of Ranebo Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 88-450 ~ 198 A 29SOLUTION 07 TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING MAXIMUM RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMOERCIA /INDUSTRTAL &RIME COLLECTING WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUO "CA _ a J i^ Gny / PAGE '=? • °� City Council Agenda y° r July 6, 1988 19 2. ORDERING TER WOKK IN CONNECTION SRTNt A. ANNEXATION NO. 48 FOR TRACT N09. 12650 12650-0 13715. 13697 AND 13742 IT 13715. LOCATIONS 203 THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIBTRILR N0. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 88- 451 204 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITT OF RANCHO CVCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 48 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE PILL ENGINaR'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12650, 12650-4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 B. ANNEXATION SM. 46 AND 30 FOR TRACT NOS. 12650, 213 12650 4. 13715. 13697 AND 13742 VARIOUS LOCATIONS THEOUCUOUT TPI CITT TO STRUT LIGHTING X&INTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 2. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -452 214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE YORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 46 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10. 1 AND ACCEPTING TEE FINAL ENGINEER'S EXPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12650, 12650-4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -453 224 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE --+ - CITT Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANHNXATION NO. 30 TC STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING TEE FINAL ENGINEXE'8 EXPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 A - k s i 4, ;f } v. y. }ry.. t= 7•. tv r f f t i pS� PAGE �..,t• City Council Apoda - y.� ° July 6, 1988 20 V. lIYLIC ARAlINC3 rho following items here ■o la[al publication or posting requirements. the Chair will open the •ae[i■R to ratairo public teati.oay. 1. NOHICIPAL BODE AMEND}SNI 10t CLAlIrICATION O1 DEAIIUCE 234 FEES SELATIVE TO ANYETArIOMS r0 VICTOIIA rLANt[D tAMNDNLxY - An ared•ant ol,Suhaaction 13.C8.04,O3 of the Rancho Cvea•o ■Ea Municipal Coda pas caininE to the application of atoll drainage ina to properties amazed to the Victoria Specific Plan ORDINANCE 90. 363 (first reading) 235 AN ORDINANCE or ros CITY cauNCn o/ Tel CITY Or RANCHO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AN►EDINC aOEaECTION 13.O9.040E or THE RANCHO CUCA$ORCA NUEICITAL COD[ PERTAINING r0 BTOW D7AIRAQ nt8 C. CTrt WNAQI'! ariYl NIOIrR The folloriat items do not legally require ■,p pahlie testimony, ■ltherlh the Qaiz my opts the ■»•ti■E for public input. 1. CONSIDEV.rION Or 1GrTE1S 10[ THt_AOVEIOEt S. 1988 236 ELECTION. vsoLtnloN No. e8-454 237 A usoLOxIDN or THE cm croDeicn or xaa CITY O1 RANCHO COCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND c1rIND Norlcc or clnRAS. MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO lE HELD IN SAID -- - cLM oN xDasDA:, THE axu DAY or rovaMalA, 1988, PO1 rHE ELECTION OF CE ITAIN O1lICEES 01 THE CITY AS 3EQOIlED DY TEE PTl)r28ION9 Or 1'EE IAMB Of THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO CENEIAL LAY CITIES, AND C0880LIDATINC SAID ELECTION WITH BrAIIY1D[ GENERAL ELECTION TO EE HELD ON SAID DATE .S a• PAGE' - y�'•yD} city Council Agenda .� V " July 6, 1988 21 - '; ii i' t17tOLITIOM M0. 86-455 238 p A IEECLDTICN 0! NNE CTf7f COOECIL OF THE CAT! N UNCHO CUCANONCA, CALIIOIHLi, ADOerzNC'NUS�DLATIOre FOR CANDTCAlEB FOR �r EL:C.IYE Ofl2ar PE2LIMUC TO 1KTEEIAL9 SORNITTED TO THE iLtCTOlATE AMD THl! COSTS O) TNR CANDIDATZS STATEIRNT rot THH MURAL WKICIPAL Nixon M TO It HELD IN THE CAT! OE TUESDAY, MMMStl 8, 1988 r 2. YMODI81 "CAEDIMC ACC939 POLICY rot MLLSIM LOAD- 240 - Consideration of sesidaat request to provide for access t private property from Hillside goad. N. COUMM SuRnml s' The following items have Mee requested by tie city i'eennil for discussion. They era met public Marius items, althe.& :X the chair sty open the Meeting for pablic import. ' 1. DISC088ION OF PEOCS88 TO PILL VACANCY ON THE PUBLIC e. BA)E1'Y CONRSSIOM. 2. DI9CU96IO1 Of APPOINTMENT TO THE SOIL EROSION AND DUST 249 P18VEITIOM CDNSQS. —M. t ' I. IDHMrMckyx0H or nme rot arr mily7NC This is the time for City Council to identify tM items they wish to discuss at the mast mettirQ. Theo itens will not be discussed at this Nestle&, only identified for the naot meeting. J. ODWeAr UTim F&M TR PUBLIC •. - This is the time and Flace for the gemeral Public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing say 'scut not Previously included on the Agenda. The City C "Moil may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comeents are to be limited to five sioutea per individual. i n ,i s M� r > PAGC City Council Aland& July 6" 1968 . -22 L AN0071�fS I, Beverly A. Authelat, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing Benda was posted on July 1, 1988, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9120 -C Base Line load. �t i :a x �l.'t - May i8. 1988 CITE of RAM'80 COGM WA CITr tIODB/CM MrAUT17/ mar Msatins A✓ CM To 0113mt A regular meeting of the City Ceaacil of the City of Rancho Caraaonga met on Wednesday. May 18, 1988, in the Lima$ Park Caearity Dentar. 9161 gw Line Road, Rancho Caramongs. California. She meeting wait called to order at 7231 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L." Stout. Present were Couscilamebstst Deborah M. Drown. Charles J. Dugout II. Jafftq Ring, Pmsela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stoat. Alm present were$ City Mamager. Lear" M. Masseaessi regal Coannl, James Marlmani Assistant City Manager, Robert Bisset City Clark, Beverly A. Autheleti Community Dsvelopsemt Director. Jack' Lan; City Planner. grad Ballots City Engineer. Russell Maguires Cmom ity Services Manager. Joe Schultat Senior Administrative Assistant. Mark A. Lorimeri mad Deputy City Clark, Debbie Admit. A A f f A A v D. A�B�O/17WYRo7110� c mom cubmitted. f A A a e A G 00111011117 tliAMI&g C1. Approval of Minutest April 6, 1988 NRy 4, 1988 (Wright absent) C2. Approval of Warrants. Register lots. 5/4/88 and 5/11/88, and Paiia -ir ending 4/28/8s for the total meant of $2,429.396.32. C3. Approval of Professional Services Agreement (CO 89-063) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and CPS Consulting Civil Engineers for the preparation of an Econasic Study as well as Design Plans. Contract Specifications and - Engineer's Estimates on the Cucamonga Creek Storm Drain raprovmesta, lhaaa I + Y 1 City Ceuacil Ninitee may 18, 1988 Page 2 starting from the Cummongm Creek Channel to approximately 1.300 feet east thereof. The not to exceed fee of $32.070 will be funded by the Drainage Food. Account to. 23-4637 -8763. CA. Approval of an agreement (CO 88-064) for Inutallation of Public Improvement and Dedication between William and Janet Law and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9517 Nineteenth Street, located on the south side of Nineteenth Street between Archibald Avenue and Amethyst Street. for the Amethyst Street at Nineteenth Strut Project. RRTOLUTIOA 110. 88-291 A azzownON or TEE QTY C70U1im OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CHGIND7GA. mipoRNIA. ACCEPTBIG AN Ansam NT pox INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INHROVID2NT AND DEDICATION PROF {BELL&[ AND JANET LA". AND AU7HORIZIHO TEE NNTOR AND C7TT MIRK TO SIGN SAM C5. Approval to accept a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (00 p8 -065) from Valerian A. and Ilirabeth J. Leier for a siugle family resident, located on the most aide of Scott Lane, north of Palo Alto Street (APN 1077 -071 -12) . RESOLUTION 110. 88 -292 A RESOLUTION Or TEE C.-Ty COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAND}GA, CALIVOL11A. ACCEPTING A IIAL PROPER" IIQROVIMNT CONTRACT AND LIIH AGRUMVP FROM VALERrXN A. AND ELIZAER'Ei J. LAIR AND AUTHORIZING RE NATOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAM C6. Approval and axecution of Change Order No. 3 (OD 87 -21) for Professional Servicev Agreement with Norris- Repke. Incorporated, to perfam design administration services for various projects. It is recommended to expand their contract by $21,000 for toe Amethyst at 19th Street, Hallman Storm Drain. AD 82 -1 and Church- Eerwou Store Drain projects, to ping their contract total to $86.474.75 to be paid from project funds indicated on said change order. _ C7. Approval to ward the traffic signal and safety lighting at Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue Improvement Project to Hovey Electric, Incorporated. for the mount of $81,332, to be funded from TDA Article S funds, Account No. 12 -4637 -8708. C8. Approval to ward the traffic signal and safety lighting at Highland Avenue and Etivonda Avenue Improvement Project to Hovey Electric, Incorporated, for the mount of $93.255, to be funded with TTA Article 8 foods. Account No. 12 -4637 -8707. C9. Approval to summarily vacate an unused portion of the Drainage Eaaement along the east side of Center Avenue, south of Church Street. -v - r RESOLUTION NO. 89-293 City Council minutes May 16. 1986 Page 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIT COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNIT OF SAM BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFURNIA. SUMMARILY ORDERING 783 VACATION OF A FORTION OE A DRAINAGE EASEMENT. LOCATED ON TIE EAST SIDE Of CENTER AVENUE. SOUTH OF CHARON STREET CIO. Approval of Parcel Mop 10737 located between Arran Route and Jersey Boulevard, and between Utica and Vincent Avanues, submitted by Arrow Rancho Cucamonga Limited. RESOLUTION NO. 88-2M A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10277 CTMM71VR PARCEL HAP MO. 10257) Cil. Approval of an indenture (CO 86-066) between the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction and maintenance of a 486 atom drain facility located in Southern pacific Transportation rigbt- of-way in the easterly side of Haven Awnr north of Valencia Avenue. PESOLUTION NO. 88 -295 A RESOLUTION Op THE CITY COUNCIL or ?BE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORMIA. APPROVING AN I =NMR3 MZ WggM THE CITY AHD THE SOOTBERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STORM DRAIN FACILITIES NITMIR THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OP- -NAY IN CONJUNCTION W1M THE DSVXLO?NW OP PARCEL MAP 9504 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORMIR OF HAVEN AVENUE AND EASE LINE go" C12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and LVravoment Security for DR 86-32, located on the northwest corner of Civic Canter Drive located on the northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Red Oak Street. submitted by CGidey Theodorou. RESOLUTION MO. 88 -2% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMIROPEPENT AOREMNT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86-32 C13. Approval of map, execution of Improvement Agte snt and Improvement Security for Tract 13644. located on the southeast earner of Hernosa Avenae and Vista Grove Street. submitted by Woodridge Estates Limited. RESOLUTION 10. 86 -297 City Council Mizarea *7 le. 1988 Page 4 A RESOLUTION or rat CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIICA. CALIFORNIA. APPNOPIM IMMORAW AGRIIMEM'. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. AND FINAL 1RP Or TRACT N0. 13644 C14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12772, located on Ramona Avon" between Ease Line Road and Cb=cb Street. submitted by M S 8 Development. RESOLUTION M. 88 -298 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM MGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPRONEMENr SECURITY ?DR TRACT 12772 C15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 85-06. located on the north vide of Arrow Highway, rut of Haven Avenue, submitted by Lincoln Property Compaq. RESOLUTION MD. 88-299 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPR09YMIW AGREEMENT MMMION AND IMPROVEMENT SEWRITr PDX DR 85-06 C16. Approval to autbc_fxe the advertising of the aHotice Inviting Bids* for the Victoria Wait* Alder Replacement within Tract 11934 to be funded by Victoria Landscape Maintenance District MAm. 2 - Account No. 41 -4130 -8769 with a loan from Beautification Food*. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -300 A Risow -rON Or THE QTY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDAGA. CALIFORNIA. AMOVING PANS AND SPRCIFICATIONS FOR eVICrom NRITa ALDER REPLARMENTe. IN MID CITY AND ADTRORIZM AND DIRECrI}C THE CITY CLM TO ADVERTISE To RECEIVE BIDS C17. Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bidaw-fbr- the Tryon Street Sidewalk Project, Tryon Street and Jadeite Avenue Nest of Archibald Avenue Improvement Project to be funded with TUA Pedestrian Grants. Article 3. Account No. 16-4637 -6717. RESOLUTION NO. 68 -301 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 07UNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PANS AND SPECIFICATICRS FOR TUX TRYON STREET SIDRNALE PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZrHo AND DIRXCTTN. YEE CITY MIRE To ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS City Council NLote■ may 38. 19" Page 5 F Ms. Approval to release Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement �+ for Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 6544, located on the northeast corner of Sixth Street and Utica Avon=. submitted by The Second RC Group, a Limited Partnership. PEOLUTION NO. 88-302 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY ITOOHCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUG1NflNGA. CALIFORNIA, IMUSIM A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AOREE)ENIT FROM PARCEL 3 OF y PARCEL MAP 6544 �) C19. Approval of a partial release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and y;A Lien Aatee,m"t releasing Lot 2 of Parcel Map 8901, located on the east side of °- Center Avence, north of Foothill Boulevard. submitted by Eelbert. a Partnership. i � - RESOLUTION NO. 89-307 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or ?"CHO corAMNGA, IFILIPOREYA. HELUTASITIG A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEE711 COMTCACT AND LIRA AGREEMENT FROM 1312RRT. A - HARMISHIP y C20. Approval to accept improvements, roles" Maintenenp Guarantee Bond for - Tract 10047, located on the south side of Hillside Mad. east of Archibald Avenw. l� Wnteasnce Guarantee Bond (Street) 8 34.700 C21. Approval to accept improvements. release bonds and file a notice of completion for the Haven Avenue and 4th Street Traffic Signal Improvem"t Project, and approve the final contract smovat of 8118.426.85. RESOLUTION NO. 88-304 A RESOLUTION OF 761 CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY Or RANCHO - WCAM7NOA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING 'DIE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR RAVEH AVENUE AND 47R STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND AUTHORIZING. THE FILING Or A NOTICE OF COY.PLITION FOR THE WORK C22. Approval to accept improvements, raise" bonds and file a notice of completion fors DR 86-20 - located on the corthetat corner of 6th Street and Rochester Avenw Poithful Performance Bond (Street) 8 48,000 � ��r..f Iy "r�i /��I\T.'^�Ff��i� } {.��.. {any �P? � • � .. ... � \4' 1 'i ..• +��g�� City Council Ninvtea May 16. 1969 late 6 MO.UTION 340. 88-305 }I A RESOLUTION O7 78E QT! COONCII. OI 'IRE CITY OI 9A71C80 'IRI INPROfiNRlC18 c i ,. COCAIONNA• GLIIORIIIA. LCC6PTIN. lOSL2C 1 FOR DR 66-20 AND AUMORIZIN 3 TRI PILING OF A NOTICE OF c!,•_ COMPLETION NOR TRI MORE i ° +'.• DR 85-15 - located on the northeast turner of Ewen ATODUG and Acacia �a Street 4 .M Faithful perfonaance Sand (Street) 8 14.000 %7 RESOLUTION ED. 66-306 A RESOLUTION OF ME CITr COUNCIL OF TIRE CITY OF PANCHO WCANONCA. C&LIPORNTA. ACCEPTM 'IRE VUDLIC IKMWQRM?8 ?` FOR DR 85-45 AND MWORIZLING 701 FILING OF A NOTICE OF i COMPLETION TOR 588 MORE TRACT 12650 -2 - located on the east aide of Nnen Avenue. north of } Ail Ma; Wad o„ ;. Releases Faithful perforaance land (Street) 8267.000 Acceptt Mainteasnca Guarantee Bond ( Street) $ 26.700 RESOLUTION W. 88 -307 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWMCIL Or THE CITY Op RANCHO CUCIMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROFIMENTS FOR TRACT 1265D-2 AND AUTHORIZING ME FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK TRACT 12830 - located on the vest side of Beryl Street. south of 19th Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 9739.222 Acteptt Maintenance Guarantee Bond (street) $ 73.925 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -308 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 791 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA. CALIPURNIA. ACMPr1 G THE PUBLIC IMPROpO[NTS City Council Minutes may id. 1988 felt 7 FOR TRACT 12830 AND AUTHORIZING THE TILING OF A NOTICE 01 COMPLETION ROR TOTE WOR'< C23. Approval to destroy records from the Administration. Engineering and Planning Departments. RESOLUTION M. 88-309 A RESOLUTION OF 791 CITY COUNCIL OF 7RE QTY OF RANCHO CUCANDNGA. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING 79Z DEB:EUCTION Or CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER RNIUIREU AS PROVIDED UNDER G09ERMWT CODE SECTION 34090 RESOLUTION ND. 88-310 A RESOLUTION OT TIDE CITr COUNCIL Or 78Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDNGA. CALIFORM. AUTHORIZING 799 DKSMCTION Or CITY RECORDS AID DOCUMENTS WHICH HAVE BEEN NICROTiLN9D AND ARE NO LONGER MOIRTD AS IROTIM UNDER CO► MOW CODE SECTION 34090 C24. Set public hearing for June 15. 1988 - Adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to coadman portions of four real estate properties (APR 202 - 061 -15. 202 - 111 -06, 202 - 111 -17. 202- 111 -16) in the city of Rancho Catamougo. located along the mouth aide of 19th Strut. east and most of Amethyst Avenue intersection for the purpose of providing right -cfwsy for ultisaa street improvements. CZ. Set public bearing for June 15. 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract No. 13644. located on the *act aide of Hermosa Area" and the south side of Vista Grove Strut. to Strcvt Lighting Maiutennace District No. 2 as Annexation No. 29. RESOLUTION W. 68 -311 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OT 7EE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMI A. CALIFORNIA. 07 PRELXKrMRV APPROVAL OR CZTr ENGINHCA'3 REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 29 2O STREET LIGHTING IiA1NTENANOG DISTRICT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 88-312 73G7.UTION 09 TINE CITE COUNCIL OF 791 CITY OF RA11CHO - 'rAIONGA, CALIFORNIA. DECLARING IT'S INTENTION TO ORDER .3 MMTZATION 70 STREET LIGHTING mrwrnoac DISTRICT NO. 2. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRTCTt DESIGNATING SAID AIORXATICN AS ANWATION NO. 79 TO STREET LIGHTING PAIN",VL1NCS DISTRICT NO. 23 PURSUANT TO IRS LANDSCAPING AND IIOHTIW ACT OT 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERZ7O City council Meates' ' Hey it, 1988 Page a C26. Set public Dearing for June 15. 1988 - Approval to Aaae: Tract No. 13644. located on the east side of lemon Avenue and the south aide of Vista Grove Strut, to Landscape Maintenance District No. I as Anaexation No. 47. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -313 A RESOLUTION Or 78E CITY OOCNCI. of Tax CITY 07 RANCHO WGNDROI. CWTORNIA. OF PMIXMUY APPROVAL Of CITY ENGINEER'S RETORT TOR ANNEXATION NO. 47 TO LANDSCAPE MINTRMNCR DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION MD. W314 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP FA14020 caCANDNGA, CALIFORNIA. D9CLARIMi ITS INTENTION TO ORDER 79Z Ui1 MTION TO LAXWCAYE MIIREMNCI DISTRICT 110. 1. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS WBICNATIIA SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 47 TO LANDSCAPE 1MINTEMNCE DISTRICT N0. 11 PURSUANT 10 THE LANDSCAPING AMD LIORTIIG ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIM AND PLACE 301 NEARING OBJECTIONS 7RRRET0 C27. Set public hearing for Joan 15. 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract No. 13644. Parul Nap 9504. DR 86 -32 (Lot 5. Tract 12176), and CUP 87-04 (various locations throughout the City), to Street Lighting Maintenaace Distxict No. 1 as Annexation No. 45. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -315 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUMM OF THE CITY O7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALI ORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY MGINEERSS REPOZT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 45 TO STREET LIGHTING YA M'IDIAN(X DISTRICT NO. I RESOLUTION MD. 88-316 A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CICAIDNGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION 70 ORDER THE A NEYATIOF TO STREET LIGHTING MINIMA= DISTRICT NO. 1. AN ASSESSH M DISTRICTS DESIGMTINO SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 43 10 STREET LIGHTING M1:NIMANCE DISTRICT IG. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDOCAPTNO AND LIGHTING ALT or 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND FLACK FOR HEARIM OBJECTIONS 'THERETO C.B. Set public bearing for June 15, 1988 - Approval to Annex CUP 87 -04. DR 36 -32 (Lot 5, Tract 12176), (Industrial /Cawnarcial), to Landscape Nsinteunce Dfetrict Ho. 3 as Mmexation No. 20. RESOLUTION M0. 88 -317 City Council minutes Nay 18. 1988 Page 9 A RESOLUTION Or SHE =Tr COUNCIL OF :HS CITY Or RANCHO WaNDNOA. CALIFORNIA, or PRELIM ENARY APPROVAL OF CITT =r0311'S EXPORT FOR ANNEXATION K0. 20 TO LANDSCAPE rArnr NNCK DISTRICT 300. 3 RESOLUTION M. 88-318 A RESOLUTION Or THE GETS COUNCIL Or THE MIT Or RANCHO CACANDNCA. CALIFORNIA. NSCXARING ITS INTENTIOK TO ORDER THE AWNMTION TO LAMCAPE MI►2KlENANCX DISTRICT N0. 3. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTN DRSIGNNTING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANEXATION NO. 20 TO LAMMCCAM MAINTENANCE DISTRICT K0. 31 PURSUAKT TO THE LANDSCAMNO AND LIGNTDC ACT OF 1972 AND OINK= A TIME AND /SACS FOR HlAl17C OBJECTIONS 7HnRTO C29. Set public hearing for June 15. 1988 - Approval to Annex LOP 87 -04. OR 86 -32 (Lot 5. Tract 12176). (Industrial /C mmorcial). to Street Ligh.tint Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 16. RESOLUTION W. 88-319 A RESOLUTION OF TEX CITY COUNCIL OF 7EE CITY OF RANCHO WCANONCA, CALLIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY 13CIKER'S REPORT TOR ANNEXATION NO. 16 TO STREET LIGHTED., YAIN7ENtNR DISTRICT NO. 6 RPSOLUYEON No. 85 -320 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DKCLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER 7HE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTNANCE DISTRICT NO. 6. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTN DISIGNNTIM. SAID ANNEXATION AS ANEXXATION NO. 16 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6: PU250ANf TO 76X LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS 7HE1ETO "• C30. Set public bearing for June 15. 1988 - Approval to Anne: Parcel Map No. 9504, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation No. S. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -321 A IPSCLUTION OF TAX CITT CONNCA. Or TER CITr OF RAN ®0 CUCANDKCA. CU.IFORNIA. OF MZLINLMRY APPROVAL OF GETS ENCIVIER'X ERFURT FOR AKMEXATION 30. 8 TO STREET LIGS7W WNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 City Ceercil Ninrt:r May is. 196 Page 30 5 RESOL PTON 110. 88-322 A REVOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL or 79E CITY OR RARCRO CECANOMGA. CALIFORNIA. DMCLARAG M INTENTION TO ORDER 718E ANLVXATIOE TO STREET LIGRTTNG NATIMOUCE DISTRICT N0. 4. AN ABSEEBMER DIXTRICTN DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS AMIQATION NO. 8 TO STREET LI.GRTING MAIITRUM DISTRICT NO. 4i PURSUANT TO THE IANDSCAPING ARM LIGNTING ACT Or 1972 AND OPITRING A TIME AND PLACE Pn2 n8. ?RING CMCTIONS 7zERXYO NDTIONS Roved by Ring. "waded by Eaquet to approve the Convent Calendar. Notion carried unaniawvly 5-0. • e a e D. O0iOr oED11A1QE City Clerk Autbelet read the titles of Ordinance Noe. 345. 346. and 347. Dl. ENVI:RONMEN= ASMIBSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ODDS AMENDMENT 83 -03 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCANGMW - An amendment to Chapter 17.08 of the Development Cede modifying certain development regulations for Le Media and Media ORDINANCE NO. 345 (@woad reading) AN ORDINANCE Or TEL CITT COUNCIL Or THE CITY Or RANCHO CUM OHGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING DKMOPMENf COM AMENDMENT NO. 88 -03. AMENDING SECTION 17.08.040 PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS POR THE LOW- MBDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT regulations for L Ikdia and Nadia ORDINANCE NO. 346 (aewcd reading) AN ORDINANCE Or ins CITY ODONCC. Or THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCANONGA. CALIPORNIA. ADOPTING TERM VISTA OONDGNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02 TO MODIFY THE LOW MDIUN AND KEDIUN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS regulations for Low- Nediam and Media ORDINANCE N0. 347 (second reading) City Council Minutes 1 18, 19" Page 11 S ' AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUh= 01 '?RE CITY OF RANCHO ' Y CUGMDN'A. CALIPDXMA. ADOPT'II16 VICTORIA DDMCMTY PLAN ^� AMNDiIM 88 -03. 10 MODIFY THE LOW - MDIUM AND MEDIUM uL RESIDENTIAL My OPHERf STANDARDS r MDTLONt Moved by Wright. aecaaied b7 Sing to approve Ordinance No. 343, 946 and 347. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. a s f ► f D2. ADDITION 10 OWPIER 30.50 TO THE NONICIPAL ODDS E9TASLIDII116 Ai11110RIT! AMID PROCROORE TO PORN;& PA'=NG DISTRICTS. A RU-0 UNION TO FORM PEOQT PARKING DISTRICT A ARGUED NNE ALTA TANK HIM SCHOOL TO ELIMINATE THE EMNCEOAWMNT OF 9>t1ICULAR HARKING INCIDEIIAL TO THE RICH SCHOOL. Jam"a Nervam, City Attorney. polled tlilz Item M that dotMr nit of this Ordimame could he wLittmd for W >st netting. ORDINANCE NO. 348 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE 01 THE CITY CAONCIL OF THE QTY 01 RANCHO CUCANONGA. CALIFORNIA. ADDING A%nC2.E 30.50 TO TITLE 30 OF THE RANCHO CnGMDMOA NONICIHS CODE TO PRO►IM PDX THE ESTARLIBHNW Or PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS r a f f i a t. ADVErn G POSLIO N1jRr g Hl. APPEAL OF PLAMONIRO ODNHISSION ACTION APPROVING TIM EXTENSION POR TENRATIVE TRACT MO. 12332 - CRISTIANO - A custom lot residential subdivision of 151 lots on approximately 85 acres of land in tht Very Low Residential District (ltss than two dwelling units per aura), located on the east side of Haves Avenue north of the Hillside Drainage Channel (Deer Canyon Drive) - AFN 201 - 121 -24. (Continued from May 4, 1988) Staff report presented by Barry* Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer. Councilmesber Wright wanted to clarify bar role in this appeal she had filed. ' She stated that a group of residents had stopped her at tbt Manning Commission meeting where this itam was discussed, and statad they had concerns about this proloct. She felt it was bar duty to help these people, so sba filed the appeal. She stated she did not rdalire all of the traffic would be dumping Into Doer Creek until the staff report came out. She stated bar main reason for the appeal was for safety reasons. Mayor Stout opened the public hearing stating that the Council should eithtr deny the appeal or grant an extension. The public hearing was now opened for those who were in favor of this appeal. Addreasing the Council werei G P ysJ - •� C. a .a .at ` _ City C*aaCi1. Miaatii 0- - Pate 12 r goh Solanior. Cristiane Capavy. who stated ke felt that tke project cents all the City requitaneare and Stood with the staff tipott. - Vic Choirk, who lives in this general even. indicated that* were four margoacy exits. Be said tbay Could nc Set a legal caaanJat , for anotgsaay access. public hearing wan now opened for those p*ople who oppenod this project. Addressing the Council veto$ Mel Chmbsrn. president of the Deer Creek Hatornor'a Association, stated be felt this plan was at the ospeast of the Deer Crook Renovators, which only would help taw other developwat. Hs felt the City Council should deny the appeal. Mark lop. president of Hem View Rstatto Hmtmmr'e Association, stated he felt if there was a sistuka in the tract soap, that it should M Corrected because the proklan would not go "By. He felt there should be a circulation stay der an the 42 lots and 51 lots. He did feel that the rergency "it was the questiaa to be derided tcnigkt. He did not feel Council bad enough infatuation in front of than to asks a decision at this tias. pbillip Morafshon, owner of the property between Door Crook Chann.:1 and Doer Crook Devolopuest, stated he would like to set the bridge go east of the Deer Creek Channel rather than the Hillside Channel. Milt Madol*. 1620 R. 6th, Santa Ana, said they are not opposing the tract but are questioning the access. He felt that the Door Crook Channel should be bridged for access. Bruce Ann Hahn. 5067 Granada Court, was concerned about the anount of traffic on Seven and vantod to know where Milliken would be going It the future and could there be scat kind of "it to Milliken. She stated she did not know why the 53 lots were going dean into Door Crook Development. Sandy Stickler. 5219 Valiudo, questioned bow the antr oncy access would be handled. Russell Maguireo City Hnginoero stated that only police, fire* and mergenry vehiel*s would bass keys to the locked access. Countilamber Ring aak*d what the ties limit was on the "tension. Janes Markman, City Attorney. stated it was not vary clove at this ties in meeting the deadline. Mayor 6tt,t closed the public hearing. City Council Minutes May lt. It" Page 15 Couneilnunbet Ling stated to did not feel comfortable with the emergency access to the north. He rid he did feel uncomfortable with the circulation of the area because it was saadwiched btweem two channels. We felt the City Council should look at the circulation a little more. Councilmembr Wright stated she agreed with what Mr. Chambers had said abut hurting one project to help another. She felt that maybe a bridge over the Deer Creek Channel onto Milliken was the answer. Councilmmebr Brown stated eke ran concerned abut the flood control and was *eked what were the chances of Milliken hooking up towards the north to this area. Russell )Yguira. City Rngineer. said they do not "pact Milliken to go above Wilma. Councilmember grown felt that an access was needed but not for the purpose of diverting traffic from Hagen. Councilmamber Soquet wasn't sure that the sate bins blockaded wan the asseerg because if that mete true. Coomaorgm reason problems would be resolved at the present time. He did not feel the Doer Crook Development should be impacted to the mouth. Re felt all of these Issues should be worked out before ground is broken on the proposed tract. Mayor Stout stated that there are two issues to think about tonight. one is the time extension of the project. which includes 130 lots. and what do we do In the future on the 95 late. He said there is the issue of permanent access in the future and the issue of emergency access for this particular tentative tract map. He felt the traffic issue for the 42 lots and the 55 lots should be resolved before these projects are allowed to develop. He also stated that he knew the county was concerned about this issue boing resolved before the land is developed also. Re stated he agreed on the design ismus. Re else felt before the development of this tract begins. the homeowner's associations be involved in the establishment of the guidelines to be sure that* is compatibility between these areas. He stated he did not feel there should be more traffic going tbrough Deer Creek. Councilmomber ping again stated the circulation needs to be looks, at and said he would vote no ■geinst the aatenaion. NOTIONS Moved by Wright. seconded by Brown to deny the appeal, approve the tine extension based on the planning Commission findings in the Planning Commission Resolution. Notion carried 4-1 (Ling voted no). Jim Markman. City Attorney. stated that what we need to a motion to modify the approval ro require the receipt of an emergency access. and the developer most agree to it. city coeatil "Letts Noy la. 1966 Wags 14 1 The dneloper stated he does net hart a probla in r6. as with the om the or on the emergency seeeaa. an stated that as fat as as an mo tea the line to the bridN, which was along with project easterly Ptopemgss, the r,old be 109171 tool aplete it. alternative rt o city staft and the tuaty in order the support is wore of a caaitweat fra the Stan stated that what they ,ad atat'd he ahead ageee co Neor net Wina happy to do this• No developer other "" justien. it it it is wade a d this. The dneloper ",a that be soul seconded by Drown to add tedeuanaaniimously 500 and to MOTIONt Noved by Wright. }eious Motion. Notion tarsi pr, this a part of the 4t eeti¢a reconvened at 9114 P•w• } }f }}i So at 92 P.M. the M Nayor Stout called aVIC, with 911 CouncilweL Wrs }f}ff} E2. BNNIDONOIENTAL AASESGtOSNt wow Davelo ant - 3.45 }t to send the P for appro:faately i C, CARTER L" boebo0d Corwereial (aC: goad and 901'x— of Dasa L19 5) Scaly report 0Tt1d protuaicnal (OP) to NAlgk located on the may 4. octal of land, 206- 202 -19. 14• (Continued TLa Avon" - Ara Alan 201-13. Associate Planner. presented Sy p(aN AI�NONOUTt 8g-OIA - JAMS Z- . Caw' Land Use Nap fra "Office" to �plgp}pOO,TAi, ASSR99NEAT locate on the Halt to "end the C1¢aral 345 - APN 205-202 -12, 14. CARTER - A r� COMMIT for opproLiaatel7 3.45 acres o! land, "Nelgbborbood Caw d and Nellasn Aven3a southwe9t turns- of q�s1955io Rua (Continued fees Nay questions of atatf regarding this Liss. 'fie City Council asked as n7 4 Addressing the Council Neyor Stout opened the 6eetlnB for public bearing• weret who stated they area. Join N9nnarino. L1PCementing Jae, CaLLOL, 1a this Patrice" area. Be 2 eonMetcid Would work well so they mould go on with the naiSbborbood Coon Cil to grant the appeal rented the City design process. Council had. u Mr. Carter stated be would answer any 0.nestions the City N ao farther response. the public hearing was closed. f Theru Ming 1 Conncilsssber iiright did not tell 8 wised one was in order at that • te• City Council Minutes ,aN MYy 18. 1981 Page 15 RESOLUTION N0. 88-092 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OP Mr. CITY OF RANCHO CICL)OICA. CALIFORNIA. DINNING A MURS'. TO AlENO THE RFELOFPENr DISTRICTS MME. DDI 87 -11. FROM OMCR /PROFESSIONAL TO NRIOOOREOOD O'AfRCIAL FOR A 3.45 ACR1 PIAICAL LOOLTRO ON 7711 SC MMUT CORNER Or SASE LINE ROAD AND HILLMAN AFIDUE. RANCHO COCAMONUA, CALIFORNIA. AND MANS FINDIlG6 IN SUPPORT THERIOT - APH 209- 202 -13. 14. RESOLUTION 310. 88-093 A RESOLUTION OP THE CPT! Comm OF 771E CITY OF Raw CUCAMONGA. CALIPORNIA. DUKTINO A REQMT TO AWND 'DIE LAND US1 NAP OF 771E GE]OPAL PLAIN. CIA $"IA. PROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.45 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOOTIREST CORNER OF BASS LINE ROAD AND HII.IMMN AT11101. SANf10 CICANOIGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MANS rINDIIGB ' IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APM 208 - 202 -13. 14. MOTIONt Moved by Ring, seconded by 3rown to sustain the appeal and bring a resolution back at the seat meeting. Approved 4-1 (Wright voting no). Resolution 88-092 and 88 -093 were not approved. Mmees Marloan, City Attorney, said an Ordinance would probably cote back along with a resolution. a a a e a e Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. There being no respotide; the public bearing was closed. RESOLUTION 110. 88 -327 A RESOLUTION OF TEE QTR COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPR09IN3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A MEUATIV1 DECLARATION FOR IRE PROPOSED ETINANDA STORM DRAIN. PHASE I. ENVIRONMENTAIL ASSESSMENT 1RIEN MOTIONt Meted by Suquet, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution 88 -323. r Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. I t TT f t, ,T City Council Minutes may 18. 1988 Page 16 • a a * a * 84. LalawrlRRr — A request to mesa too w USTal nan Lana wN sap true LA J tela• Residential (4-d dwelling milts per acre) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) for 5.03 acres of land, located on the south side of IIm a Lim Road, east of Archibald Aveaae - APNt 206-031 -18. 19. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Stout opened the setting for public hearing. Addressing the Council worst Pet* Pltaspi. Architect of the project, who &sve details about the project and how it is designed. He did not feel traffic was a problem at this particular location. He did, however. hors a problem with the ogresseat on page 3. ites 3, which tefors to the effective date of the project. He ` felt they needed note time in order to get the eacrw closed, but that they would go ahead and enter into the sgteiraeat. Another area of concern was on page 9, item 23, which was regarling the 30 day enforcement clause. He felt they needed 60 days. His last area of concern was regarding 81 -02A, the secondary agrewaent, vbich is a three -party agrement. Be felt that ire a lending standpaint this would be almost Impossible to tie both projects together. Hr. Pitaeai introduced Ater Horse. Drvelopar of the Societe Project, who stated they are not asking for the project designation to change after 20 years has passed. No also reiterated many of the things Hr. Pitassi had stated that they felt were problans. Hr. Markman. City Attorney, stated he &&read with Hr. Pitassi in tbat ha felt it wasn't necessary for 30 days to acquire title. He stated the Council should go ahead and keep the 30 day cr able period. He stated he urged the Council to retain be 30 year restriction. He stated that on the 75-SOS low to moderate iccone. -a felt that this was strictly a Council policy decision to make. As far as tying the two projects together. be felt that was how the applicant had originally wanted the itam to to considered. As the senior project is completed, a certificate of occupancy would be issued for that project. It didn't seen that if both projects were not completed within three years, thai' the conditions bad not been net in the agreement. Brad Buller. City Planner. *toted that the Planning Cesmiasion bad wanted the office project to be completed concurrently or before the senior project. Bob Dutton, also associated with the project. Bore more clarity regarding the two projects being considered together. There being no farther reopen". the public hearing was closed. Cauncilamber Wright asked what could happen if the senior project failed. i. c' ,3 i City Council Minutes May 10. 1986 Page 17 Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated ones king of a new *grestant would be brought before the City Council at that time. The City Council concurred that they did not have a problem with the corzdpt of this project. Councflmember Wright amid abe had problems with the left turns into the project from Ease Line. She also wanted Design Review, to consider the view situation to the west of the project. Pete Pftssst, Architect for the project, said the Design Review process has already talon place. Brad Buller, City Planner, amid that based on the Planning Commis*ion's denial of the general plan emeudment, they denied the design twelve and that is why this appeal is being filed. Mr. Buller further stated that if the Council agrees with this project. he felt it should be referred back to the Planning Commission on the design issuam they have not yet resolved, which is the covered parking, open space, and any additional design Sasses that may be raised. It was agreed by the City Council that$ 1) The tan of the development agreement should be for 20 years. 2) Market rate versus Taylor. The Council concurred that 50% is reasonable. Jim Markman. City Attorney. stated that the last sentence in paragraph 3 should be deleted it= that agreement, and 3) Enforcement clause — 30 days was *&read upon. Councilmember Wright asked what would happen if the office project did not build. where would the senior project drain. Brad Buller, City Planner, said the senior project could not build unless they tied into another project. Mayor Stout felt this item needed to be referred back to the Pl*nniog Commission to get sore of the details wor'wd out. He did feel there needed to be covered parkin&, and he did feel the left tun issue from Ease Line into this project needed to be addressed end the issw of neighborhood compatibility - needs to be addressed. its also felt that the landscaping isaus needs to be addrescd. Mayor Stout did not feel they needed to have the same standards as sp■rtm*nts have. Councilamber Wright disagreed with what Mayor Stout had amid regarding having the same standards so apartments. She felt they should have the same standards that apartments bwee. Councilmmber Wright again reitorated bar concerns about the left turn from Base Line into the project. Russell Maguire. City Engineer. did not feel this was a hazard and did oat feel the project would bwea gotten as fat as it bad if it were. City Council Minutes Nay 18. 1985 rage Is RESOLUTION NO. 88-324 A RESOLUTION Or THR CITT COUNCIL OE INN CITE 03 RANOEO OUCANOEDA. CALIFORNIA. NSNIIIG GFANIAL Ii.AN AMMUNT 80. 87-046 REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THC LAND USE SIUMM OF THE RANCHO COCAIONOA GENERAL FLAN FROM LOW - MEDIUM RESIDEh1TAL (4-8 DRIM&IM UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH RESIDENTIAL (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRI) FOR A SIHIOR HOUSING PROJECT ON 5.05 ACRES OY LAND LOCATim ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EASE LINE ROAD. WEST OF ARCBIBaLD AVENUE. RANCHO CICANONGA. CALIFORNIA 4-8 dvelling unite per acre) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) attached with the Senior Housing Overlay Distri:t GOOD) to the base district for 5.05 scree of land, located on the south aide of Be" Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue - ArHt 208- 031 -18. 19. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -325 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITI OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIPGRAIA. DENYING DEVSOPMRNT DISTRICT ANENDIENr :O. 87 -05 INQUFSTING AN AM KMM 70 ENE DEVS.OrIENP DISTRICT NAP FROM LOW- NEDIUM RFSIDEN = (4-8 MMLrwG UNITS PER AC1E) TO HIM RISIDENTIAL (24 -30 DWELLING UNI7S PER ACID) ATTACHED WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD) FOR 5.05 ACRE HARCIL LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DABS LINE ROAD. WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, RANCHO OUCANO)GA. CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT AGREE76M 87 -02 - LAUXSE DEVELOPMENT - A Development Agreement between the Cry of Rancho Cucamonga and Hocrsa Development for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.20.040 of the Development Code. Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment units to be located on the south side of Dame Line Road, vest of Archbald Avenue - APUt 208- 03118. 19. _ DEVEIOPMRr AGREEMENT 87 -02A - MODISH DEVELOPMENT - A three -party Development Agreement bitumen the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Hoarse Development and West Rod Investments for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 17.20.040 of the Development Code. Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment units and office medical complex to be located on the mouth side of Due Line Road, vest of Archibald Avenue - APH 208-031 -18. 19. senior apt:tmaats on 4.85 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 Melling units per acre), located on the south side of Base Line Road. City Council Minutes may 18. 1988 Page 19 vest of Archibald Ayes" - APMs 208 - 031 -18, 19. Associated with the project is Tree Removal bait 88 -14. nFfv— uA me raaaalag 6 111111'1 0011 -10, daeyfag the development of 01 nquarc foot medial office building o, 1.7 acres of lead in the Low-iMdiv Residential District (4-8 deellisg waits per acre). located on the west side of Archibald Avence. mouth of Rase Line Road - AMe 208031 -17. 34. 55. 56 and 57. Aaseciatad with the project is Tree Removal Pewit 88 -14. Lo Madiue Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) to Office for 1.69 acre, of land, located on the west aide of Archibald Avenue, mouth of Bane Line - APNs 208-031 -17. 54. 55. 56 and 57. RESOLUTION NO. 88-326 A RESOLUTION Of 783 CITT COUNCIL OF THE C;TT OP RANGED CICAWIOA., CALIFORNIA. DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMBNDMEINT N0. 87 -04H RA)0ESTIM3 AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DUE ELEMENT Of THE RANCHO CIGAIOIDA CEMRAL PLAN FROM LOW- MEDIUM GESIDENfIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS MR ACRE) TO OFFICE POR A 1.69 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE VEST HIDE Of ARCHIBALD AVENUE. SOULS OF BABE LINE ROAD. AANCiO C GLMOMGA. CALIFORNIA swn awvesrtmste - A request to -,end the Davwlopment Districts Map it= Lo Medita Residential (4-8 dwelling "its per acre) to Of ties Professional for 1.69 acres of land, located on the went aide of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APH: 208-031 -17. 54. 55. 56 and 57. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -327 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITr ODUM2. OP 789 GITY OP RANCHO COCAIDM7A. CALIFORNIA. DENTING A REQUEST TO AMEND THR DEVC.OPM3NT DISTRICT MAP, NO. DDA 87-06 MON LOW- MEDIUM RESIDEN17AL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS MR ACRE) TO OFFICE /MOMSSIOAL FOR A 1.69 ACRE FAE(XL LOCATED ON THE WL9T SIDE Or ARCHIBALD AVELSDI. SOUTH OF EASE LINE ROAD, RAN%110 CUCAM NGA. CALIFORNIA M rIONS Moved by Euquet, seconded by Ring to prepare the following documents for action at the nest City Council nesting. Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 87 -040, m, otdinance effecting Development District Amendment 87 -05. an ordinance approving Development Agreement 87 -02, no action was takes on Development Agreement 87 -02A, preparation of a resolution approving General Pion Amendment 87 -04H, prepare resolution approving Development District City Council Minutes i' May 18. 1988 Page 20 f Amendment 87-06, a referral of the senior project, which is Development Revlon 87 -33. back to the planning Ctmtaisoion for development review@ design revise, on those focused iaaeaa, and a resolution approving Development Review 87 -340 which is the West Rod Investment projects. Notion rzarried 4-1 (Wrigbt voting no). Rf *1ff Item C1 was discussed at this point of the ms*ting. Refer to the reg.i.ar order oI the agenda for disnasion. Mayor Stout called a reaaa at 11t40 p.m. The seating reconvened at 11150 p.m. ' with all Couneilasbore present. HN }* f * * R f f ES. ENVIRONMENTAL ASBLSSMOR AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ANUMOMKMR' 8"S - ARNNNSON - A request to rend the Development District Map from "FC" (Flood Control• to "LM" (Low- Medlut Residential, 4 -8 duelling units per act*) for a 1.06 acre parcel, located north of Highland Aveaun, neat of Milliken Avenue - APHt portion of 201271 -55. Staff report presentsd by Scott Murphy, Associate Plannor. Mayor Stout opened the mooting for public Input. There being no response, the meeting continued. City Mork Authelet read the Title of Ordinance 349. ORDINANCE NO. 349 (first reading) „ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN(MO CUCAMNGA. CALIPORNIAr APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88-05. REQUESTING A ORAMCE IN 709 DRYULOPWWT DISTRICT DRSI,GMTION PROM "FC" (FLOOD OOMR)P.) TO "LM" (LOW - MEDIUM kUIDRNFlAL) FOR A 1.06 ACRE PARCI L LOCATED NORTH OF HICRLAND AVENUE, WRST OF MILLIKEN AVEME - APNt A _ PORTION Or 201- 271 -55 MCTIONI Moved by King, seconded by Eugnet to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance 349 for .lints 1, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. * a * * • a E6. CRDERINC THE WORK IN ODNNSC710M WI7H1 Staff report presented by Lauren M. Wassa•tean, City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. There being no response, the public bearing was closed. U; CLtF Comcil Nlestes may 18. 1988 Pop 31 RESOLUTION NO. 88-328 A EEBa.OTION OF THE cm COUNM OF TEE CITY OF MICRO COCANONGA. CALIFORNIA. ORDERIM 7RE WORE IN OONRCFION WITR ANNQATION NO. 4S TD IANOEGFE NAINI MOUCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACOtYTINN IRE FIML yDIIIEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT 13425 IMOLUTIONN N0. 88-329 ON F tas CITY OF COCANDICA.=IF0EnA.. ORDERING 7NE WORE IN MMUCTI0N WITH ANNSATION No. 42 TO STREET LIGETIIEN NAI1T187MNQ DISTRICT E0. 1 AND ACCEPIIMN 'IDE FIIMT. ENOINEEE'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13425 EESW.NETION no. 88 -330 A RESOLUTION SO COF THNIA�EDRRINi TBEF WORT,OIN WIORCIION WITE ANNSDATION N0. 27 TO STREET LICHTINO WMnV"CE DISTRICT N0. 2 AND ACCBPTI u 'NHS FINAL mAINEEE'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13425 RL90LDTION N0. 88 -331 „_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT CoONCIL OF THE FITT OF MICRO COGNDIGA. CALIFORNIA' ORDERIRO THE WORE IN CORRECTION {..YN ANWATION NOB. TO STREET LIGHTING' NNINTENANOE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ERCINEER'S REPORT FOR DR b6-43 RESOLUTION W. 88 -332 cALIPORNOf IRS ORDERIN' THSF WORK IN CONNECTION WPDI ANNMTION N0. 15 TO STREET LIGHTING NMIRTERANCE City Council Miaates,. may 18. 1988 Page 22 DISTRICT NO. 6 AID ACCSPrI1C 7HE 7111AL RROINmIB REPORT fOR DR 86-43 D. AMAKIATION 10s 19 NOR DR V. LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORMMER OF STE STREET ANO DA33M AVENUE, TO LAPPS PR Minusmassax DIE77HICT MD. 3. RESOLUTION MTD. 88-333 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7RE CITY OP RANCHO C1CNDMA. CRLIEOREIA. ORDERrW 7RE WORE Ill CNNECTION WITH AWCUTIOI M. 19 70 LANDSCAPE MIJIRMICE DISTRICT MO. 3 AND ACCSMTIID 701 FIML 11OINC1R'S RETORT POR M 86-43 MOTION: Mosed by Esguet, seconded by Irmo to approve Resolution Mos. 88-328. 88 -329. 85 -330. 88 -331. 88-312. and 88 -333. lotion carried unanimously 5-0. To TRiSO ZINUU f N 71. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearina. Theta being no response. public bearing vas closed. RESOLUTION NO. 88-334 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMCNUA. CALITORM. MDDIDYINO POLICIES PRRTATI MPI TO .z THE METHODOLOGY OF ASSISSKW WITHIN TERRA VISTA'S c LANDSCAPY MArKrZNAHIE DISTRICT MOTION: Moved by Buquet. seconded by Wright to approve Resolution Mao. 8D -334. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. * * • n • a d F2. CONSIDERATION OF BSTABLISHMZNT OF SPEED LIMITS - Recommendation to establish speed limits on Victoria Street from Haven Avenue to Mendocino place. Baker Avenue from 8th Street to Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive from Foothill Boulevard to Alta Coast* Drive. Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau. Senior Civil Engineer. City Clerk Autbelet read Title of Ordin -nce Mo. 350. ORDINANCE N0. 350 (first reading) ;c' ■ 1 City Council Nisuta ' May 18. 1933 page 23 AN ORDIUMCK or Tax CITY C OUNCZL 07 THE CITY Or RANC210 WCAMICA. OILIMORNIA. ANSNDING SECTION 10.20.020 Or TNN RANCHO CUCKM) IA CITY COOK RNGARDI.T., PRIM DLCIE SfEBD LIMA! UPON CURTAIN CITY BTRnYs Mayor Stout opened the sooting for public hearing. There being no texponsa. public bearing was closed. NOTION: Noted by ring. "waded by Baguet. to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 350 and set "mad reading for .Tone 1. 1938. lotion carricd unanimously 5 -0. 'x aaaaaa i2 O: CTS! M MER's Carr =lam Gl. CONSIDERATION Or RBQUIST BY CITRUS LITTLE LIAWI C:ouocilaw:ber Buquet questioned the lights going off at 10:00 p.m. and that no inning could start after 9145 p.m. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Lave Bonham. Little League Administrator and a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. who stated that the - urfevs for both the Little League and Senior Leagues usually go beyond the 10100 p.m. time limit. Bob Stallings. 7333 Vineyard Avenue. said he would like the curfew for the lights to stay on beyond the 10:00 p.m. time limit. Rocky Reynolds stated it to very difficult sometimes for an inning to get over between 9t45 and 10145 p.a. Re felt the tine limit should be "tended. William Johnson. a resident on Vineyard Avenue. wanted the curfew, to stay at 10100 p.m. Counciluember Buqur: suggested that possibly the time limit be met at 10t30 P. a. Councilmmber Ring felt we should do everything we m1Qd to encourage theme genes. He had no objection to extending the light policy to whatever time In needed. Councilmember Brown felt it was a good idea for tboso league saes to be in Rancho Cucamonga. She said she would agree to not starting a new inning after 10:30 p.m. City aamcil Winston May Is. I9e8 page 24 auncilaeaber Bogaet suggest 1Ot30 p.m. curfew for the Little Gages and 1It00 P.M. for the Seniors. auncilaaeber Wright mid obe had a problem with extending the curfew beyond 10100 p.m. Notet A letter was received by Mr. 4 Mrs. William J. Johnson. They wanted to make it part of the record stating that they were against the Sights being left on after 10700 p.m. NITIOWt Moved by Brown, seconded by Ting for we now inaiuge to start after 10130 p.m. for the little League. and me new innings to start otter 11100 p.m. for the Senior League. lotion carried unanimously 5 -0. f f f f f f G2. AND i4a MOTIONS Moved by Bugwt. amcoaded by Ring to approve the policy. Motion "tried unanimously 5 -0. f f f f f t report RESOLUTION M. e5 -335 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF TBe CITY OF RAN ®0 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAR FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 MOTION: loved by Buguats seconded by Ring to approve Resolution lo. 88 -335. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. f f f f f t G4. CONSIDERATION TO UTILIZE CONDEIOMTION TO OE'TAIN Opp -SIT. RIGHTS -OP-W! FOR T3MTATIFH TRACT NO. 13805 ^ LEWIS P.OMILS - A request fat direction concerning the use of possible condennatiol. proceedings to obtain off -eite street rights- of-way associated vith the development of a proposed tentative tract located at the southwest turner of East Avenue and Summit Avenue (Arm 225- 181-4. 6. 7. 8 and 451 225- 201 -28). Staff report presented by Darryl Hanson. Senior Civil Engineer. MOTION: Moved by Eicg, seconded by Brown that it may be necessary for eminent comain at a later date. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. fr,L}t r City Cauneil Wastes May is. 19" Page 25 f ~ A as a A aR t G5. TRRE PannVATION ORDINANCE UPDATE. (Cautioned to Jame I. 19M) t•� N. oMwu EENIINEN °R Y% Brad Buller. City Plummer. made the statement that this particular request is already in our code books. R2. CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE 11COMNENMTIOW T'O TTLL VACANCY ON PARK L RECREATION COPOWSION. Councilmombor Ring suggested that Nark Whitehead he recommended to the Park and Recreation Conmissiom. IDTIOMI Moved by Ring. seconded by Wright to appoint lark Whitehead to the Park and Recreation Cmuission. lotion =tried unanimously 5 -0. A e a f } } N3. CITY COUNCIL SUB0OMMMIT11M RECOMMENDATION TO PILL VACANCY OR PUBLIC SAY61Y OOMMIISTON. Councilmembor Wright suggested that Pate Amodt be appointed to the Public Safety Commission. MDTIONi coved by Buqueto seconded by Ring to appoint Pate Amodt to the Public Safety Commission. lotion tarried unanimously 5-0. f a a a} f I. IDERYMCITION OE rY WE NEXT Numm None submitted. F } a R f f f J. COM MOLTIONS MR aE Puma .° JI. Nelson Start. 6006 Cluseman. ranted to know what the statue vu on getting the new typewriter for the Rancho Cucamonga Library. ' g'i,: "..''. �iA• " "3`'''�' "'"'%d- '�.�.: ,e .�..Y J_. ._ w °.r,. ..7y¢ .'F *v_C,r t._.:� :.y*5 City Caatfl_Niuwos.,, .4.,f,.J'• _ ;z,i,: :F�. +. lay lg; 1pgg patio 16 Law" M. Wssft y . City. Nu Ssr, said be will contact the county *boot this'.: immediately. J2. Csuncilmsuber IIstunt suggested st,thi■ point of the meeting, that the City of DWcho Caecaosga got-involved with the Cea*ty operation for their- Child ' Disaster preparedness meeting. _- t* t a t a k Albl�!• NOTIONS Moved by Ring. unneeded by I,mn Va adjourn to Nseeutive session to disease amployea rtrdstiouw: Nation carried uaamiaaualy 5-0. She noting adjourned at 12t40 a.a. - Uspectfully sabmittod. Debbie Adsaa Deputy City Clark 'w Appcoeedf t C k lo i r -': �/ pl[C6/ HRL GSM" ., C OTHER ITEMS, :E'TRANSV L OIMER2440 1MEMTAL /1UY'OUT tin / 60.COPIE- GSM C OTHER ITEMS' I CLASS /`6200 kYPENT BUSINESS LICENSE kCT•.SERVICIT SYSTEM RED HILL 7-4-66 A IMM /AHf RICAN A C OTHER ITEMS 2ARes OINNkR S 9 C OTHER ITf MS 26.5 HOURS M 4/70/66 R /MIH3E /RENIHISH iR MASS C WHIP. ITEMS SONS THROUGHOUT PARK FEES O C OTMIR ITEMS FE ES OR 6i26R Nf ELEC title SAFETY FACILITI R 1102 RC NEIGHBORHOOD CENTEP 410 OF JULY EMTEMIAlHRLR. Rcv n..a REFUND CLACS 6 7142 REFUND CLASS R 1104 REFUND IN LIEU FEE ell C OTHER ITEM! GAMINE' ' ' r( pNA RA.ANT. 171.0) - 145.73 104.56 4)8.55 �j.. .y t ♦r aiti S -.a 632 RDNOASUUtSw 2 %: 291' R L•R AUIONOTIVF 5 F2 —i Y,YI- t p ; 63I ROMOA SAA,L 3VA.Y _• ! ��.>•+ 1746• - V ESTHER E ' 1796 ACCURATE PATTER" CD I016 STEVEN ALLEN ,1519 AIiA IOMA MUSIC %f.,, _ 401 1759 _- AMERICAN EXPRESS AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIITION v Y u 1763 AMERICAN RED CROSS ' 1225 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL EMS. f11 ART ANA004 ` 26 ASSOCIATED ENOIKEERS ' 402 AUTO MISIORATORS .T• 1722 6 N I ROCKS 181 5 S I CONSULTANTS INC. VlfA COALITION • 1766 1177 GALDY RALLOOMT TUNE 1725 BANK Of AMEREG y2Y 1761 ME 6ARMKIAX COM ►ANY 1107 EDYTHE SAWIlE 1764 BARTON DEVELOPMENT CUPPANY y1021 BERRY COMSTRUCTICM. INC- A INGRID /LAIR l BIT BOPARK ENTERPRISES INC. BRAMOMAN AISOC, INC 254 1744 MICHAEL LINDA BROWN J 644 BUDGET PLUMBING C RODIER 1741 JAXELLE BURCH ' 1692 MIKE BUSTER - 1640 GLTF. CHEMICAL GISPOSAL 1761 CAN BALL 1741 JUDY CARMICHAELAE53 1745 MRS CARRASG 1771 CNAAFEY PLAZA 489 CHEVRON t' S A. INC �/ pl[C6/ HRL GSM" ., C OTHER ITEMS, :E'TRANSV L OIMER2440 1MEMTAL /1UY'OUT tin / 60.COPIE- GSM C OTHER ITEMS' I CLASS /`6200 kYPENT BUSINESS LICENSE kCT•.SERVICIT SYSTEM RED HILL 7-4-66 A IMM /AHf RICAN A C OTHER ITEMS 2ARes OINNkR S 9 C OTHER ITf MS 26.5 HOURS M 4/70/66 R /MIH3E /RENIHISH iR MASS C WHIP. ITEMS SONS THROUGHOUT PARK FEES O C OTMIR ITEMS FE ES OR 6i26R Nf ELEC title SAFETY FACILITI R 1102 RC NEIGHBORHOOD CENTEP 410 OF JULY EMTEMIAlHRLR. Rcv n..a REFUND CLACS 6 7142 REFUND CLASS R 1104 REFUND IN LIEU FEE ell C OTHER ITEM! GAMINE' ' ' r( pNA RA.ANT. 171.0) - 145.73 104.56 4)8.55 M 1655 74 1721 752 110 65 67 941 219 1209 $94 1696 116 1762 107 107 1716 260 1777 617 1106 1717 1747 e 611 N 1693 CHIWO ?1111 INSOMNCE C CITY AND STATE CITY RENTALS ALBERT NEALE CLAM COCHRAN C MIC14CLS INC. , COMPUTtK SERVICE 10, CUCAMONGA 00 MATER DIST CUCAN03GA FAINTING CUZY'S AUTO SU►PLY,STOPE 0 C K CONCRETE CO '• X.G. DANIEL$ COMPANY DATACOM SWICE COMPANY OAVIS DEVELOPMENT DE AMONG CONSTRUCTION JADES DENSON BEARISH GUERIA C ASSOC. 0170 CHRIS DIAZ DAVID DICK DOTTIE DICK ERIC DICK DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION JOSEPH OUPOMD NICK SARIN EASTMAN, INC THE ECONOMICS PRESS. INC. 1172 ENERCOM► INC. K7 1699 1729 FIELDSTONE COMPANY AMANDO FIGUERDA • 1175 FINE ARTISTS ENTERTAI 1763 FISCHER PLUMING AND 1765 FRECKLES C COMPANY 06 JERRY 6. FULNOOD 1174 FUN TIME THEATRICS 733 C P S CONSULTING CIVI ' 364 TONI GARCIA 117 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 1765 GENERAL TELEPHONE 1604 VASILE OIULEA •• 1761 GLEMF(D DEVELOPPENT L743 MARDI GOLDSTEIN 0 HEATING ._w -.C'r -sue - "aYj' Yf iw'�t •= RAMCNOQICAM IM3A'iP IF 2 v •i. . r....3;.t : ITfP. oES CII � _ �''NAPAi- AAF A.APT. - ANY! .1i -46ST -6606 ." 'ti{70 '+, sr•1100 :00 .SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 24621 15.00 „ROIUR C OTHER ITEMS 24522- S52.S3 ' NIlEA/E NEINSIA151mNT • 21,521 36.00 TAI 11 100 BLADE - 2024 ,.. 34.17 •-'T' CABINETS) TESTED C OTHER ITEMS 24926 4.62x.00 S ?TO N ARCHIBALD PRY % 2452 6 55.66 ►TANNINS CMHISSIDN H C OTHEA ITEMS 24527 292.96 SIGNAL'fLASHEA C OTHER ITEM 24525 119.71 CEMENT 24529 319.06 AROY ' ' 24530 315.01 SERVICE 6 /1/U TO 5111169 24631 1.134.00 REFIMO'IM LIEU ELEC FEES DR 67 -01 24332 91164.61 PROGRESS PAYMENT MO. 1 ETINANDA COS 24033 6.141.63 MILEAGE AFIIMURSFIRNT /NEST NOON lOC 24514 61.20 PLAN CMICK-SERVICES THROUGH 4 -29 -91 24535 40.129.00 DESK PLATE 2036 A.30 ACFVFD CLASS R 714:. 24631 21.50 SOFTBALL STAFF 2 HOURS 24516 10.00 LABBAGE PATCH PICNIC 5 HOURS 24559 23.00 SOFTBALL STAFF 43 HOURS 24540 226.76 PPOSRESS FAYNENT M 2 AREA VII STORM 21ftl 111.200.40 REFUND CLASS 0 7325: 2042 12 00 REFUND CAASS 0 9313 25543 20.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 24544 201.26 SUBSCRIPTION -2 COPIES OF 12 ISSUES 24545 2$.63 MICRO 3 RVAC SIZING 24546 262.39 REFUND IN LIEU FEES IN 13057 245? 12.623.96 PEFUNO TENNIS 0 1700 24546 20.25 4TH OF JULY CW..2RT "REFJR4W)I" 2049 100.00 OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24550 20.70 CLOWNS FOR 6 HMS 4tH OF JULY 68 24561 150.00 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT FOR 5/12 "TO 24562 .10].00 CLOWNS 4TH OF JULY RE C OTHER ITF NS 24561 600.60 ENGINEERS ENGINEERING SERVICES/ MAY 63 SOFTBALL STAFF 17 HOURS 714 - 944 -1673 C OTHER ITEMS REFUND IN LIEU CIFC FEES OR 06 -3T MILEAGE lit"UASEMENT REFUND IM LIEU ELEC FEES TA 13425 REFUND CLASS P ?141 20S4 7.261.00 24555 60.00 24556 566.62 24557 1.950.00 24555 27.90 24559 22.210.00 24560 20.00 L` A/ r 6 -22 -18 LIST OF WANNANTS,.f. PAYEE 1023 DOW GREEK C ASSOCIATES - 1023 DON GREEK C ASSOCIATES 1746 ALISON MALPORD 1776 HAMMES PROPERTY 1777 HAVEN INVESTORS I 1766 HIGHLAND OXFORD LID PARTNERSHIP 616 THE HIGHSMITH CO.. INC. 1056 HIOVEY ELECTRIC INC. 161 S.N. Way LU6alR CO. HONE CENTER 1775 ANN HUNSBERGER ETS AND ASSOCIATES 1156 CNF JOHNSON 3774 STEVL JOHNSON 1742 PATTY KELSEY 649 LANSON PRODUCTS, INC. 367 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 1466 LINCOLN PROPERTY 1372 LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE 1720 WILLIAM LYGN COMPANY IT61 M C N INTERNATIONAL. INC. 1740 JENNIFER NARIKELUE 76 MARKMAN C ARCZYNSKI 28 HHC KAUME WIN 008FRT . P.E. 1124 LOFIRAIMF MJASTERS 8a9 JASON PETER 602 PAT MITER 651 MEFSR, CHUCK 1739 MAT MILLED 1726 PAS. MILLER 1738 SHEILA MITCHELL 1089 MOORE ELECTRIC CONTRACTING 1750 TINNY MORRIS 1143 CNEANICE tULLGRAV 1127 MAGDA HURTEZ 230 N 9 I•S THE OFFICE PLACE 615 M 8 S /LOWRY 922 NATIONAL GRAPHIC SUPPLY ING$) 712 NORPIS- PEPKE. INC. 1757 WORTH ORANGE COAST PA /NTINO 1010 NORTMIDOO REPROGRAPH IC SERVICE 309 0 C a REPROGRAPHICS. INC Y RANCHO CUCAi0NOi PAGE'.3...� ITEM OESCR WARNO 400.0% PEVI SE ENASEf I ADO I C OTHER ITEMS 24561 19.411.90 AEC VINEYARD C 600TNT L OTHER 17f0f 24563 - 1.T 47.30 AEPOS WEST R PO11 14561 76,00 DE►OSIT_REFUND PERMIT 3926 - 24564 1.000.00 OEFOSITINELIEU PERMIT 0 3919 24566 1.000.00 REECHO IM LIEU PETS TO 13275 (LLC 24566 12. 1a2.U0 ITEMS FKEL SERIES LOCATOR N C OTHER IT ENS 24567 160.54 PR00HESS PAY"NT NO. 7.5 SPRUCE 1:! 34566 1.170.55 OOMfLIMi S1ICAS /SPOOL OF STRING - 24SN 11.01 14 DAYS DISABILITY . 24570 553.14 19TH SIR.' IRPROVERENI NCPHOSA /CARTI-24511 12.826.00 CARLOS C CMMLIES /PTOS AND SEMINARS 24512 32.91 SOFTBALL STAFF S NOUNS 24ST3 25.00 REFUND CLASS • 16CO 24574 :7.00 ASSONTEO VEHICLE PAINT. SUPPLIES 24575 182.47 PICISI04TION P. NFIGNT•JULV 20 -22 24576 145.00 REFUND IN LIEU ELEC F'JES DR 85 -06 24577 18.252.00 SUPPLIES 24576 3:3.51 REFUND IM LIEU FEES T C OTHER ITEP.S 24579 17.6!9.33 BUTIUMS/CALENOAR /BOOR 24560 205.44 AIFUNA WLSS 0 7172 246al 2.25 CLAIPAMT3 VINCENT.SC C OTHER ITEPS 24582 406.60 PLAN 04ECK 5 -1 TO 1 -31 -84 2456) 1.000.00 REFUND CLASS • 7025 24684 15.07 SOFTBALL STAFF 7 HOURS 24565 36.73 SO$T&ALL STAFF 26 HOURS 24586 130.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 6 HOURS 24587 10.00 REFUND CLASS A 7330 24568 15.00 REFUND CLASS R 7101 34589 19.00 OVENPAYRiOT NOODSHOP 24590 1.00 PROGRESS PAYMENT NO. C OTHER ITEMS 24591 11.301.60 REFUND CLASS 6 80L3 24542 36.00 CONUTER INTERN PAYTrNT 24593 '2 %.00 REFUND CLASS • 7601 24594 30.00 WORK STATIONS C OTHER ITEMS 24595 - •1.144.00 ENGIWEINING AND PLANN C OTHER ITEMS 245% 5.667.46 PRINT FOAM 24597 162.18 CUCAMONGA STORM OPAIN C OTHER 172M3 24698 3.222.06 OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24699 12.72 WORK ORDER C OTHER ITfPS 24600 40.00 BLUEPRINTING COSTS C OTHER ITEMS 24601 526.91 r -. Z-V7, L 'ii"4 A r 6- 22 IST ce OVA -se 'I wa RANCHO CWCAMfta;s4i61,'i 5, 4 e PAYEE ITER'DESCA lkwoftcw. ---------- 1695 DAN Q-WGILL DEPOSIT WUNO PI&MIT'a 3059 24602 Y•250.00 1767 OASIS ENTERTAINPENT D.J.- 12-4 ►.M. 4TH OF JULY-Ai' 24601 350.00 I&Si OttVAS PLUMBING COMPANY' INC. OVERPAYMENT $LOS-FINNIT AT638-76" 2%04 14.Qu 2 32 ONNITFAMS WS PASSES C 10 CARDS 24605 e.00 410 ONTARIO DAILY P9P1)RT I2,N*MTM RENEWAL•` C OTHER ITEMS 2460f I44.00 659 ONTARIO SAVINGS C LOU CWE ESCROW ON CITY YARD 24607% 542.05 4- 1139 HENRY PADILLA $Of BASS. SUFS 6 HOURS 2%07 33.00 IW PHOENIX DESIGN ENGINEERING a OvC TAY.✓' —dINESS LICENSE 2% 01 23.00 1749 POMONA VALLEY g,k.B.S SQUI-S',ANCERS 11-12 00 4IN OF JULY, -24610 • 100.00 1200 PKINISYS INC. I KA MA I /FLUSH JACKIMISC.,►ARTS 2%lt W .01 1725 PRINT, CE HALL INC. gust I Is LETTER HANDBOOK 24412 47.77 iY 1686 C. L. PRUITT a(?* REFUND Pimply a 2011 24413 3,000.03 9" ►URKISS.ROSE ASSOCIATES PREP, aTION OF CONSIR C OTHER ITEMS 24411 1,118.10 1163 CUALITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY JKFU16 IN LIEU FEES CUP 97-01 24615 5.663.97 261 R C R AUTOWIVE SERVICE 0 221, -- 21616 514.92 P. P. 1036 0 GODU►, INC. STREET THEE REMOVAL C C OTHER ITU4 21617 1,510.96 9*0 SANJON&DIS16PA"HIREZ ADVANCE NORKSHOP 4-29 C 26 24618 100.00 396 RANCHO GLASS MIRRORS REPLACE WINDOW LIONS COMM. CENTER 24619 266.00 C. 1110 Mo. NAITO SOFTBALL STAFF 22,MOURS 24620 115.60 1760 RICHOWICS CORPORATION WIN PROGRAM EQUIPMENT C SUPPLIES 24621 16440 1686 THE RESENTS OF U.C. LEAFLETS 24622 66.78 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT I LUELtME POINTS/ITAPL C OTHER ITEMS 24623 106.77 343 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO PROGRESS PAYNEMU001tj 2 24624 33.795.0 1735 EVELYN WARN R REFUND CLASS & 7512' 24625 15.03 1782 RUSSEL STANLEY MST INC. FEFUND IN LIEU Pigs NOR 66-24 2,166,67 8,185.31 1693 ?I S c MOUSE CLEANING SERVICE OVERPAYMENT OF BUSINESS LICENSE 24627 6.96 071 SAM BERN CO OFFICE OF mMGMmT SVC TELEPROCESSING SERVICES FOR MAY 09 24628 211.00 1490 COUNTY OF SAN REMANDING REPORT OF GRANT EXPENDITURES/0EIMOU 24629 10,607.66 V I&IS jam SANTOS $OFTIALI STAFF $1.5 HOURS 24630 263.47 1729 PATRICIA SMEASUY KNITTERS FOR KIDS REFUND 24631 11.00 1110 SMART C FINAL EGGS F FOR 47H OF JULY I I 24632 400.00 36 IS& SKIDERLE TkIZLS,CANDY RE C PsA ION MISC. EXPE C OTHER ITEMS 2433 136.71 tool THOMAS M. SHIMULA 111hBURSEPENT MPUG CONFERENCE 24631 -2i.62 1662 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOISCN Co. 7369 HAVEN SIC BASELINE, R.C. 24635 96.00 317 SOUTHERN CALIFOPWA EDISON CO. 31 SASELtME-MARINE ME I OTHER ITEMS 24634 117 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOISnM CO. LIONTIMS DISTRICT RU. C 07HER ITEMS 24437 24,073.29 319 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS04 CO. 1211 HAVEN C ASH THAT C OTHER ITEMS 24,638 8,290.00 323 STANDARD BRANDS PAINT CANOPY 24639 $2.95 336 SURVEYORS SERVICE FILSON ORANGE VEST - 42 24640 89.2 613 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE LT LIKE ADJUSTMENT C OTHER ITEMS 2%4t 2,400.00 223 JOE TORREZ CONTRACT SERVICES C MILEAGE 24642 2,490 40 t'. ` 1763" �fi1MR 'TYRMlR' + §inr`•t�{.ti(rl`., 1621 UPLAND I AM f6Pl.000,' V - 391 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE r.f' SELF 1444 CHOCK WTNTER fTW1A0f r^ i e SSIC + 417 L.A. N CONSTRUCT AffEt 'INC. 1696 JOAN C RL WAMICTIEN CASSOC1:'.• ^•''-. 442 CARL MARL N C CO11E-L A1fK1... 216 CARL WARREN L IME C•' f - 217 HA %]I. 1lINDUSLIMA COMP ?69 VOLOIME ILLETT AL C 7002 fIXPI 1746' SHANK E. WElEMiiM• ' K1 fMARON E. WILLIAMS ILLIAA 1165 DALMY MILltA13lOAKOTA COHSOTf - 692 RONDA SULLIVAN + a 4. RANCHO 'CYCAiONa• ". IT(F, Dfft %'.� MARRiY'-iASSI:AeT:, KOOAMi FILM +'2414) ".. n°,P:•il.•__ f406REY$IN SOlTK011 CNAASER /fERV 24444 291.12 ESTIMATE W0 ,* A :,24446., 195.167.71 RIRVMQP M.LIEU:E{9C,PIIf,CUd 11-26 24646 ,_ 7.471.00 - S6RAM60.7AA1_LUO1Tmmsw, KR•/IC1f',FARCF'1 EC FEES AIR "2 M .24146 711.00 CHIT CTUO&LU EIEC Plff ROUGH TXIO3;q 74649, 1.711.00 SERVICECIIMAl �3ERVIGEf THROUGH RS 24650 677.01 SERVICES C OTHER 1TSKS 24441 992.54 SOLO %IA - 24157 135.65 A 1 21 P.M SERVICL.CAAR6f 24657 144.66 AMC ECR 1 -7 R.N. SERVICES 4744: CfLIEMATIOM 24654 _ Iss.00 SECRETARIAL SERVIGET - -'241S6 .165.00 1UNF[6N12MJ [ %FIE1T10Nf 10-6 R.F. 24136, 400.00 7 - 47112 PETTY CASH y C OTHER fR ITE lTFtf 49177• - 171.01 7T'Ai. TOTAL CHECKS 060.765.14 r •= :r 1 ss.1,,,�� �,,CCr� • t I PAYEE LIST Of .4NRRANTf - - RANCHO CUCANONSA FACE.I it*" 1672 SIXTH STREET INDUSTRIAL PARA 7 ABLETADNICS 664 ACE LOGO C KEY , 14 ACTION TRAVEL�AOENCY 6S4 ACE LOCK C KEY 7 AQ "RONICS 14 AC:.GN TRAVEL AGENCY 1492 SAN BEEN CO FLOOD CONTROL GIST. TO RAY.CHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER 332 RONDA SULLIVAN 1680 t.B.P. INC INC. ASSOC, INC M EfLR .. L W WARM � �WAFR.AMT. - I- CHICJU OVERLAP I 1636 A C S - OVER/AYMFNT 6U. 5 LIe PO C -10 -69 - 2 7 ABLE? 14 ACTIO ' PIN KALf 1FfNL/I1000 PLASTIC / P029/21 2 1167 ALL-C 17 KEYS /PO 6 -25 -68 C OTHER ITEMS M 26 ASSOC AIRFARE TO SACRAMCNTO NAST PC 0 -26 2 763 AUSTI b\ 21 RC K 17 KEYS /PD 6q5 -86 C OTHER ITEMS 2 te/ 0 S I ' 163L BAKER AIRTIME TO SACAAMENTO WAFT PD 5 -23 2 33 BASEL 24014 - 2 963 BEAR DAY CRIER CONSTP, PHASE I 2 1646 CATHY OWNER FOR JIM FROST 2 1052 ANN B PETIT CASH C OTHEO ITEMS 2 254 NICHA BUY OUT COPIER SK 01264A6 C 2014642 2 1677 JACK ' Me BUILD 057 C 00 lee C.I.A ?ND CAST IRON COVER 2 1169 CAL -S SARTON 2373 CABLE C OTHER ITEMS 2 4.6 CALIFI ADDITIONAL AIR FARE- SACRAMEN10 2 902 CALIF TENPOPJRY FENCE BERYL PARK 2 1644 STATE NEVIS TO 6RA6 PLAN ► C OTHER 17EMS 2 1616 ARTHU INC INC. ASSOC, INC M EfLR .. L W WARM � �WAFR.AMT. - I- CHICJU OVERLAP I I - OVER/AYMFNT 6U. 5 LIe PO C -10 -69 - 2 21463. 4 4 -11.54 ' PIN KALf 1FfNL/I1000 PLASTIC / P029/21 2 23909. : :' 17 KEYS /PO 6 -25 -68 C OTHER ITEMS M MID. - -27.83 AIRFARE TO SACRAMCNTO NAST PC 0 -26 2 23911. - - 216.00 23112 - 2 24010 17 KEYS /PD 6q5 -86 C OTHER ITEMS 2 2401.1. . .. 27,65 PIN MALE/FERL /NDOO PLASTIC/PC 5 -21 2 240121 2 24.25 AIRTIME TO SACAAMENTO WAFT PD 5 -23 2 24093. 2 253.00 24014 - 2 24140 DAY CRIER CONSTP, PHASE I 2 24141• 4 411,000.00 OWNER FOR JIM FROST 2 24312. 3 30.00 PETIT CASH C OTHEO ITEMS 2 24341. 2 276.07 BUY OUT COPIER SK 01264A6 C 2014642 2 24344. 3 3,076.00 24311 24346 24117 ?ND CAST IRON COVER 2 24346 1 12.21 SARTON 2373 CABLE C OTHER ITEMS 2 21319 4 41.11 ADDITIONAL AIR FARE- SACRAMEN10 2 24350 1 11.50 TENPOPJRY FENCE BERYL PARK 2 24151 5 5:9.00 NEVIS TO 6RA6 PLAN ► C OTHER 17EMS 2 24352 1 12,682.17 HIGHLAND /ARCNIBALO APRCL 1 -30, 116E 2 24353 1 1,360.00 HUNIUGTON M000/LENf /A L' OTHER HENS 2 24394 4 475.93 LABOR CMAPOES /SUPERVI C OTHER ITEMS 2 24361 5 5,366.92 TRAINING VIDEO$ 2 24366 1 125.00 SINGLE SIDED BEY C OTHER ITEMS 2 24357 3 35.11 NET 30 L OTHER ITEMS 2 24356 4 493.16 REIPBURSEMENT FOR WORK BOOTS 2 24369 4 47.S1 CRAFT ERPEhSES /MAT C P401 OF JUNE 2 24360 3 35.92 PROFESSIONAL FEESIDSA C OTHER ITEMS 2 24461 6 6,158.10 MIRUASEMENT FOR SAFETY NOES SHOES 2 24762 - -S0 - DIRECTORY OF LICENSED CONTRACTORS 4 -00. I CONDITIONING MAINTEMANCE /2 FILTERS 363 _ 97.29 CONSULTANTS OVERTIME INSPECTION 74365 384.00 SERPUOA C OWN ITEMS 24566 942.00 PRODUCTS INC REG CEMENT C OTHER ITEMS 24367 27.40 SIGNALS AND LIGHTING C DINER ITEMS 24568 11,564.65 OEPARTPENT IONFOR OR NA6NING DIMES CES GROVE C 8 24369 16,500.00 TUITION REIROURSE6ENT 24370 25.00 a:? - s +� O J v 6 -10 -88 LIST OF WARRANTS PAYEE 1447 CHAFFEY CGPAUNITY COLLEGE 717 CHtCK'S $POP -ING GOODS INC 74 CITY RENTALS 357 COCA -COLA OF LOS ANGELES 130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO AS CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 65 CUCAKONOA CD WATER DIST 6T CUCAMONGA PRINTlkO 1641 CALLY CURTIS CO 92 DAILY REPORT 264 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC 1674 DATA BASED AOVISOR $79 BE LE W1 CATKIN C COPPANY IT67 JAMES DINSDN 107 OETCO 929 OEN -PAR SALES SERVICE .79 DICKIES STANDARD INDUSTRIAL 946 E S 0 COMPANY 023 EASTMAN IRC 124 FENCE CAAFi OF UPLAND INC. 1022 FERRY -MOPS[ SEED COMPANY 125 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS. CO. 371 FIRST INTERSTATE, BEAR TRUSTEE 1642 JOHN W. FRANCIS 137 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 1628 GREATER LOS ANGELES CHAPTER 1023 DON GREEK C ASSOCIATES 1673 MORI GUERRA 997 HACIENDA LANDSCAPE INC. 1626 HOER7IG IRON WORKS 1214 ROSEMAN 1627 I.C.S.O. LOS ANGELES BASIN CREPT 912 INDOOR COMFORT CONTROL, INC. 909 INLAND ME BEAT ION BOARD 1679 INSTITUTE OF TRAASPORTATION ING. 1628 K -CART 179 RAISER PERMEATE 1669 KEEN BUILDING SPECIALTIES 1786 AS AN ECUIPMENT 910 WILLIAM KIND 1643 LA F C0 ITEM DESCR RANCH? CUCAPDNOA PAGE 2 WARR6 WARR.AMT. US. GYM FLCOR /WOMEN'S LOGREF /CUSIOD 24371 328.00 GUARD SUITS /T SHIRT /SCREEN 24372 136.73 TRACTOR /SKIPLOADER/DItSEL FUEL 24373 566.56 RENT fan 6166 24374 17.00 SERVICE MAN /SERVICE 7 C OTHER ITEMS 24375 3,762.46 BEAR GULC4 PARA ON AR C OTHER ITEMS 24376 2,967.49 BIN $1 C DEER CREEK L C DINER ;TENS 24377 124.99 0 10 WINODW ENVELOPES C OTHER ITEMS 24376 1.406.36 VIDEOS 24379 72.33 ADS I OTHER STEMS 24380 3,976.26 MULTI 6MM TR.ANSPAFENCY 24381 14.64 12 ISSUE SUBSCRIPTION 24362 23.05 SALARIES /FETAIMAOE 25383 9,098.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT LOCK UP PROD 24^184 63.36 8 ROSETTES 24385 19.69 RANGE /ZVLIMDER /IRIPOO C OTHER ITEMS 24366 8,939.17 UNIFORMS /TOWELS /HATS 24387 192.S6 ASIDE P259 MYERS 24358 2.C6T.00 DISKETTE PANEL C OTHER ITEMS 24389 111.44 54S /CARRIAGE BOLTS 24390 36.92 CRASS SEED Z4391 1,049.40 OVERPAYMENT 06 -2 APM 101- 271 -T4 24392 2,302.09 JUNE INSURANCE 24393 7,754.07 CITY FOUMDAtION -APRIL 1 -MAY 31,1965 24394 1,125.00 714.980 -900? C GTVER STAKE 24395 7,776.31 VMS VIDEO CASSETTES 24396 662.00 PROFESS104AL SERVICES C OTHER ITEMS 24397 3,903.76 WOOD CUT -OUTS TC_ DAY CAMP 24398 $5.20 PROGRESS PAYMENT MD. OTHER ITEMS 24399 61,307.35 OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24400 9.?S 861 -BFJ 24401 29.80 ICBO SEMINAR PAUL TAYLOR 24402 20.00 9340 BASELINE /REPLACE BLOWER 24403 - 168.00 SENIOR SHARED MOUSING C OTHER ITEMS 24404 4,970.02 TRAFFIC PUBLICATIONS 24405 214.50 FRAMES FOR DESIGN AWARD RESOLUTIONS 24406 136.16 JUNE INSURANCE 24407 9,231.10 OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICiMSE 24400 30.11 CABLE ASSY /LABOR 24409 201.29 S 1/2 HOURS COMPUTER SERVICES 24410 425.00 ANNEXATION APPLICAIIUN FEE 24411 1,290.00 k 7 Ttii L { -15 lift OF HARRAMIf L "+ ITEM OESCR :. PAYEE .. .. jS3•` - -------- �. 1670 LAM0CAPE UMSSRUCTOCS'K"'-%' 1621 ROMMIE AND TINA LEE 1231 1646 LE6t -TECH LOCAL AGENCY FORPATION 200 LOS ANGELES TIMES ,art_ 161E MACNOPLO 17i 1661 MAGIC LAMP 16 "AR"AN C ARCZYP3 MI 4S0 MARSHALL C MCMN =GN1 10HING,INC. 1126 NC GAAEC MACHINE ' 1676 MARY MOSPC III ^ 1143 - CHEARICf MULLGRAV *. 1617 1663 MARY NADERI NATIONAL CAREER AORRSHOPS if Ill MORRIS- RE ►AE, INC. 301 0 C S REPROGRAPHICS, the 701 0 C S AEPRO6RAPHICS, .0 EDAILYAREPURT INC 410 1224 ONTARIO ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SVC, INC. 23S "m ELECTRIC [ lb" 1631 ►. I.P.A. PACIFIC COAST NURSERYPAN PAGAZIN 664 PACIFIC COMMERCIAL SPORERAGE 221 RAC {FIG PRODUCTS lK. 16 ARNS INC. 6 PRIMEECOnPU1ERN OVId All SUPPLY 1 66 1 219 PRUDENTIAL 1612 LAURASJ. psn"SCIATEI 231 R C R AUTOMOTIVE $S P A A 1116 RAPCO CONSULTANTS AMSER 624 PAUL'NS TIREMSERRVICE 1631 THE 0, Flo NORSE COM °AMT 1000 A.N. OEITER DEVELOPMENT CO. 1165 RICHAROSON AUTO BODY, INC 112 FITZ CAMERA CENTERS 216 RIVERSIDE OLUtPRINT 61 R06INSON FERTILIZER CO RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 3 NARAB- FIARR.ANT. I 66-01 E L O1NfR ITEMS MID /APRIL 66 I C OTHER ITEMS 1 L OTHER li[nS v C OTHER ITEMS k THE FRICE OF1 F C OTHER IT.HS DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION f O SHOPtTfnf 24442 SERVICE TRANS SERVICES RENDIREO /LAN OTHER 111" 24{47 APRI1 10 10 MAT 17, 1966 24441 JUNE 66 7.4446 TIRE REPAIR /SC PT DVf9PAY1ENT BUSINESS LICENSE =44411 NNE O6 RENT 60CT HORR SHERIFFS UNIT 4619.11 24449 0 13 SP (MS-768) 24450 in 21220 ION CUT TOM ESLENO C OTHER ITEMS 24452 I- A�1 •10-66 LIST Of'11A1 PAYEE .._ on S C L M CONPA E FRI{MT ' NCO. INC ' i6f� IX C. 1664 - IRA STERLING COiifE ffRVl t - 776 SURVEYORS SERVICE 7237 SYSTEMATIC IRRIGAIION CONTROLS 1071 TND %ELL it q72 U S SPRINT 1654 DAL] WAL %ER RAILROAD TIES ;f 416 CARL 6A6SIM C CO 21] W %If PLfEM-LINE CORP 411 Mf ST %1Rli SN1N0 CO 1656 WESTERN GOVETWIENTAL PESEAPCN 1166 WESTSIOt SEPVICES 406 JAMES i. WILLIAMS 96L SHARON E. WILLIAMS 50I THE COSPORA Il ON 7Ti TEE MEDICAL SERVICE 672 FOMOA SULLIVAN 6 FF pEfCR PETTY CAT" i{4 Ni �E"S ; VEX W/0 C �C IGHIS�975 AVE I YST ON U X �� AUTO "PEA 2 -4 -L ES RC C OTHER LIENS 7.0 C OTHER LIENS INVOICE IEp/ASST PLANNER 1 /NERIIAGE WAS ES S 24464 - C OTHER ITEMS TOTAL CNECNS 1 s. •, PAGE e'S' r Y.,fN •�. HARM. ANT. 5`I5,80.g9 20.00. _ '160 -364.60, ";. 670.00 1,)16.11 15.07 19.14 ' ]9.46 4,112.46 427:67 1,444.67 1.900.00 700.00 ]60.00 1,976.92 16].79 — 17.1.01 ill,gsl.gq MANI omi, WUNVAW It S�Wt I I L ............. WOMM --30 143, Im b�t F� ....... ;.: ... 1 1, � ....... ..... ....... .�m a ......... I^ w Im I'm pgoVal ftm, 1� • k� .......... I M in LIN LM M 6" Mtl L" 6,IV Lm LM LM MH W. Lil %Iu 1, M LIN LI" %Vol. �Iu. • kmrm .......... s L41 It," I. 26M 11.1011 . ............ 1 ".111.36142 Mm m m I.HK I.M ...................T W,MI.tI CIO cm W I.U&S a, lid, IdWltl" IllittmWUPPOPM ..................I ".W,%Ln I 1311311 It" MIT XI MM I 1 i.Ot, t%l tit. 1"t WIVOIll 10OCt. SO Mtrl PaW h 111 W . 1, mi.01, U% o,tiOW Idicy WItH ►rt 3, IW. f Olt 0 Olt : .unt pah, 1. "diAlf I. IM 11., holm. 0 the Imid111trA1. M"Mbwtt. "o 41. Owdit, 0 rl rt rM.. wtiww 0t 111 *m MR 11IS11�I 111o1a Klan - m - slain IM Ian IaM art tat fm lax salt "ITO met 111 MI MN "1I IAm1a1U a MMti - M 10% •WMlla {3431111 ".IM.M ",M.N ",01.00 I.W I.M I.E6 Ioi11111 IN MM aawud alma IN,M." I1"I.M.10 IM,NLN I.W I.M I,M amm in Mx MIT O1B[ 1100 100,00.4 I00.a1.M {11110.11 I.M l.M I'M 6oiN/" nl W" M amr Wilts N.M,M p.00LN ".M4M /.M /.W I.ID x111111 24 "IN Ila a W r 1611100 1101"1.4 I141M.N IM.M.N I.M I.11 7.01 Willa I IM Ila a maam tnxlll 110M4M IN,M.N IN.110.M t.ln Mb 1.721 171" III Nla W MIIW Wines 111.003411 IN.M.M I00.M.N Cm I.736 I.1711 13111,11 M MIE Isa M114 W14M IM.W" IN.M.M 111.10.0 LIN LI51 LID sWls II x001 I wwn wWE 00.x411 .^x,17411 M.x411 I.M LM cm WING I MM ssva M11N11 71.003411 N."oll DAMN LM LM LW "al4/11 I NM UaWMllalla nilm ".M." ".M.N ".NLM LM I.1M 6.114 WILN = NMI 1x1100 ps a N mom 19.00.4 F,M.M . 41.41.00 LIN LIN LIx nM /N Ill am maR im WIIA III,IM.M 100,00." 1N,N4N LIN Lm LM allow IM Mal 11n Alt t U Into/ 1",43411 IM.M•M MOM 1.4% 1.0111 - 191 "MIS M Wa 11"W m 114}1100 IM.Mp 100.M." IM,M.N I.MI I.M Lea toiWS 1M Mn twm Wilts 111.M." IM,W.N IN.M.M t.M /.M I.4" 1oi11a1111 w MII /`1x341 Mix 1161 "NIM I0.001.M Ip.IM.M 110,MI.N I.M /.U4, /.M 1111100 n Ian [ ill WMI M,M4N M,M.M M,M.M I.M 1.00 /.El Rims IM I" C Wn1111a 11111111 IM,W.M 1",M.N 100.00400 1.110 1.14 I.M ,,lip II1 14111 Kali earn Ma 112117116 I00,M." IM.M.N IM,MI.M ILIA ILIb IL200 WIM IN will fire qua a I Met 11114'11 IM.M.M M."m 10,101.1 9.01111 /.:N "in toilets M MW IslMl llfnaslM Wlns I".In.E 311,117.E M.M.E LW LM LIM • x "I vI sufun lull 616 0111111 M,M.N III.F6.M IN.Mo 1.M Low LIM we" at Mitt MITMMMN Wilts 1141,40.0 I4111M.0 IN,M.M I.M 9.234 1.24 WINS 100 00111 gimg"W1atimm lull F.NLN ",A1.N ".141.00 LW LM 1.111 131011" 111 IaM M1mat 1161 "IIM ".IN.M ".W." ",M." /.M I.M I.911 ",1" N MM W-AM alial lla 11174'11 100,001." in.p4M {,[00.10 I.M I.M 1.00 IY7Up IN "I UMm mu I m "111111 19,100." K,M.10 ".43400 LM LM 1.111 631111/1 M 0031 IIniuuwap m q/nM 100,4400 IM,M.N 111"W" 1.271 9.2% 9.111111 "Mall al "1n "{hill Ila a wilts xM1Y I/I,M.M IN.M.M IN,M.M 9.7% I.N/ 1.M mim f" knl alimmMmtr. IML" 1W.p4" 10,00.0 100.01.00 LW LM 1.111 RaIM In 6109 1MN altlt L1a wit," III.p1.M IN,M.M 110.01.10 1.16 1.111 I.M "1" W Ne" me I= "hill Ia.M.M 1W.M.0 IM,W.M 1.IM LM LM "9111 a Min KIIIC set"lla lull1M 14,00400 IM.W.M 10.0064 LIN l.W 9.123 I111Up at MNl F[nit "In Ila 1 tat IINI/a IM,M." III,M.N 1".10.00 1.03 7.110 1.141 Wilts IM 11" "11114!" 6m 11111111 IM.M.M IM.M.M 100,01.00 LW LM Lill "11161 M 041 "in sn WIN "11/11 1p.M.K 10,01." IN~ 1.M LIN LW IINIfM 111 "M ■m Un as 61,11M ",M.M ".M." 191M." 1.00 1.M 1."1 "Ilk" nl "IM aMS m Ioi11M ".M." ".1040 ".M.p I.M I.M I.Ib 13411111 101 Nln faAVN few anal loillM IM,W.M IN.M.p 100,00.00 1.00 1.30 1.1n "toil M am 111Ilmill olim a 11111400 60.".00 Ip.M.M 104.111.4 7.1" 7.10 1.1" 111}4101 no 4114 Is as sisal m $I/WM IM.M.M II/,M.M 161,10400 I.M LOP Lill I1WM 11 "M Con Ill as In)n[ ",M.N K.NL" ",60.01 LM LM LII9 "111/19 411 Mn aim 4 l m Wells 1",01.4 IM,M.N M.M." I.M 1.200 I.33 Qnup 210 Wn mill M a 1X11011 W14M 111,00.0 110,04.0 IN,M.M 9.14" 1.M I.Ib 19111/" p 4/7111111 IIt /O "/.,t lE1M11131 In- 3 tM , aN p, IW Y=iM twlttmi U/o now t® 01U mI I= atim VIM —IU— "min "n MEI "li 14% tw W pn n at %fN- y+Iy. v- � Iy 1 K mnrom N O IT . /KI r, a, Wn IYNI ORION all NN cling I".w.N W,w.N ip."I.M LID ?.in I.DO 1211" In 111.^ m•IIttM mum along ImUI1, W a" M.1." " ^0 110,"1.10 M,w.N IM,NN i.M t.M I.= p119ng 09,014.00 LW LW LOU IIMM 71 711 •iii 01111 wiK )mat 11R 131!1010 IM,M1,01 I10,M1,N I01.9N.N 74« I.I* T.W gimm, 711 - MM Kpliml w piling IILMI.M 1N.W.N WOOL." I.W I.W 1.017 N /Nfl/ ID 14.4 NUT M R m NN 11,11M IM,101.N 101,w.N 110,116" t.W I.W t.ng away NDI nmm wM Yf UMW I10,IMN ng.w.M w.w." 7.w 7.W ).W IaMM In d• rI MMO mro1w m III" %ILM N; 1".W." IM,M." 1.10 7.34111, Lm gut" "MN11I 2% wit RIPEN PIN AU OtM M.W." ".Mot, 09, w." LID Lin LMI IN fan WADI filing UpM ".w.M M.W." M.MLM 1.M T.M 1.142 pmm In 1' "M midi Mtl/IR Uling w.N1.N 1,1.10 110.041,01 ).M /.M T.M 43.uM in •• �< fail Ins" mtn m pm/N 09,ON.N ".M." ".W.M I.M T.M /.DI ILMT al :..I wwu w a I.iM,w.n 9,D9.n1.N i'Sn't 7.01 LM I.w at miromwPmt ttt In "M NW NMINro11OIt Mt WHIN =M IMIm "it" 1".101." 09.10LN W.w.N ".W." IN,w." i.W LM LIII Will" I.,W.N LW 1,w 1.111 WIIT O In 'g 01111 p1NKU at tit 9ulull n.M." ".M." 09.W." /.710 1,1 WIUM 710 iron II mm M,w.N M.W.N Lill ",141.0 LW LW LIII 71 1 wevel 40 WtNim wing LID clam WWO M N" win I117UnO i W1411 m am" ".W." D,W.p T %M.M n,w.N LM LIN till LIII Nip 1111111111111861, W1ult ".M." 09.1." M,W.N LIN Mi" LM LM 1.01 IS r is two t i l D111M M.M 09,1.19 ",W." 09.1." 1051 I.ir1 Lm fin" O „ - WD wo utI7NUI lO[Nl WIN IMUU m Ni,W.N .0 NIpU.N 1.011.10 1.14 /.M LW SUI" In In WII < JIIR Writl 110.M.0 IN.W." ani IN,W.N M 1.70 U M \W N1D t u w Ul IITM 10,1.0 N,W.O 09,1.11.13 I.W 9.111 il/mN L LUS It IM Mw prolix US WiNI WD1M 09,61410 09.W.N I,W 1.711 I.p1 t7TM MO MIn IlI11N9LL Ywm IunM MIN04 M,W.M ".W.N M.w.p M.w." I'm LION Lw wwT w Mil aQ7tOt t 1 t 9I11711) 09.1.10 09,M1,M ",W." LW Lw LIII M9u011 I wM ultl iwm t l tlllull w.1." w.W N w.w." /.D. I.M T.m again n �- fan UPTON wa MR IITM M.M1,N ".W.M n.M1.N LM L= LW IITM LI MIS PIN p KUtCliRn. 42111,11 IM.w.N 1011.19 110.w.0 I.W /.w I.NT 421WM DO 01111 tD tN'tt N1 M.W.N ".w.M M.001.16 Lin 947 LMI WUM D7 'I "ID IMliti.r kmm 12111M t",w.N I",W.M IM,W.M I.W /.1 9.111 lulu" 111 s "M fI m WlmiWIN nngm "'Ni ",w." M,KM LID Lm 9.22 lmlll IU cord llm tLW11 1"1 m 02114110 "'M." P.w." LW LW LIII I✓WM DI •S Nap tint N1U11 Wlm Iran? 09.w." M.M9W^411 "'Moo LW 101 I/M 71MM ail MM lml nm Wlm 161,11111 IN.W." IN,W.M LW LOU 9.161 IIMng ISO Wh Vital KY mm LOOK 111110" IN,OW." IM,W.01 IM.W.N 1.N/ I.1 I.pl IIIIUM IN Ming Mital Nnm t tla 1m,p 09.1.0 09,W.N %1."1,01 LM LIW I m 10mng « ; MIS Il01l1a WOOD pDuU 1.w.m.i1 I.w,W.N i^mw 1.1 1.0111.m 114210" 119 NI91 KIN«I IUIm M/1L11 I00,1.1 IM.W.N w.w.M I.W /.W 1.%1 MnOng M y MITI Yt elm Swm l SON! 021/11 09.1." M.W." M.W." •.1 I.W I.M alum IN NI« ant Nim Wlm ama? .11.1." W,1." W.M .0 I.W 1.W T.+1 I1Mng n /L 1 «mna _nn OF Wu 421/1"1 " 1 WOW `•NOT `. : , - r�l .'i .� •. �'v, UIlT -M�- M1alU1 111{ - L1B 110 Nl i'01. -y 11q wIM Mae la11 Mn 114 W MT M OI 1 • 4Nnn. nn P %no IMIILSI ID i IMIP14K/ M O111I • 1 { t .. '�(: `: , • +` ,� �• 4011 our lU0 WM NnIM I,W,.4.m.Nom I,IN,40.% LIM 1.00 S.M 011110 Mn mi 114011 /MM MII" M1M." •' W,M.N M,M.M LIN Lin 7.1" WIU" met O mw INIM 'W11M WaP.T 1p,717.N 7M,nL4 7.664 1.407.141 omm MIM IU1 Otr 7MM WIYII- L1.Mro :M.RLN M rm, L", I'm LUS WOM MIS out MPM MUM PMM ti ".40.0 ",W.% n.M•" M.M ILM ILI" WOM MIN AIM IOI WiM 4R1IM IILM.N IN.W." I%.NLN.7ue; /.W im1 WIPP Mil W1MM11L WM1111 T.T4.M ".MW ",M." !."'6640 Lill NNIM NMI IINJIWM{IW 111➢/al 19.00.0 ",40.0 19•40* LIM LIM LIU IIMM Mtn iM%MMI111t0 "reveal IM.M.11 IN.W." iM.soceet 40.S.M 7.M "IWal M" � InWM 1 LM WIIM IM.NLO IM.M." IN.M." LIN L1M LM WIU" TIII MOM" W1M 111" /1mM✓ �IM.M,% I%,W.M IN,NI.N 7.1" I.IN /.IN WUm NNt roams Mew 1 NM fuwu ",M." ".1"A ",W.0 LW LMLIN Oil[" MIL 1"14/14 I0140 110,111" 10,1166% 1." 1.0 I I.II "at MIN NI N tRRi IllMM IM.%4.0 IN ^" IM,I0.0 LIN SAN MIS Iallllly MNI MII "IMNI{lW 17/IY% M,M.M IM,W.M 1110,14060 7.111 7.10 /.MI IPWN Mn M11111�IM WM11 MMM ",M.% ",40.11 11,40." 7.111 1.54 /.W allll" MIU MP %40%1 WM II,1 ill 19,40.0 ",40.0 19,114414 Lai 7.40 L"I /NIm MMI 1661"1411 WOW IM WIIM 1%,066" I0,01.0 I0,01.114 1.10 I.W LAN W1 /m %M me mm OWN" P117111 IN~ IN,W.N IN,40,0 I.In LIM LIiL WIII% M" M m WIM m I1MISI "'MO ".W." ".40.% L,M Lin LIM "110,11 win Few WM 166111 Wllm ".W.M ".Mn ".M.M LIM LIM LIU WNll1 04113 I imimt 11111111 :N.M." W.M." I140.00.11 7.661 LIN LIU IIIIU11 Man IIWIW tiro IPIUP ",M66M ".M." 19,40.0 LIT Lin LOSS IVI4M MM b a mm "MISS ",M." N,M.M ",al.% 1.n/ LIM L143 "mw 010 M<Rm11n16t II11W IM,N4.0 IN,M.M 10.40." I.W 1.40 Lill 1111:/11 MT MITIWII{L "I" ".W.M "'WO 19,1%.14 /.W L" /.W MMm Met MM11M WMI I lW IV" IN,M,M N4.W.0 meoLm LMo LIN Sall unim WT 11"401"1; N11W11 IO,M.N 111.40.% IM."LN 6640 LM 1. "I llSlm Mnl 1401111 IUUL W IIr11M ".40.0 ".M." "."440 LW Len LIM 111UO NMI M My. WM UNIM 4141." ".M.M 11,01.0 LM IM Lill 1710" "140 1111101 WIM/IlM anew 1@#.144." IN.W.M I0,M440 1.M 7.40 4110 11,71M me UMIM Mira MOM I711IM ",M." ",M.M ",W.M Lan Lin LM I71W11 040 uKnu NRM 1 LM IPIIM I0.M.14 W.M.O IM,M." LIN /.M LW "r17,11 MII I 11nM11all 1413" ".MI.M ",p1.0 19.1;1.0 I'm LIM LIM Willis MP N]n WIN I LM P la 114114660K I0,M.0 110,01.0 1.7% LIM tall 111771" 4913? mnj m fML WI01 4;iM IM,"L" W,M." M.11L% ).11 1.00 I.nl WOm "141 MN MUM WI" UIPm ",W." N,MLM 11,11.14 1.100 7.10 7.119 WW" MP LL OJiIn MI" PIP" ".M." ",M.M "AN.0 LIM LIM 1.01 IR"m "l/ "UM MML 11 t Unl/11 1%.M." I",M.M 1M.W.00 LIU 1.40 1."1 41,21 "IM "MIL WM I UK 0117111 I ",W.M IN,IR.M 1111"140 1.2% LIM 1.P1 IUUm Palm 144 RMMI L%M.M.P 11MO.W.0 11.110."1." I= 7.91 L4i mIn IUO11b1 foot :10l 114Il1O11 Mi flal 66"1.146614 LM.M." ],40."1.% 7.111 1.10 1.111 1 • 4Nnn. nn P %no IMIILSI ID i r "•' a " . .•- -I VY; "s` ''.)l 117 ay i- r.. - : 110101 ' pA I` Ndt ;j'._ ...• M - 1{ '?� t•�: ` IHIU IN n1— -owl" �. .. +J•i'.. YR wl. tYi ItR IlR Yfl YYR fl1( YI( IN w MR II Yt - - .K' '�� y; Mkt 000 ®tom It R111OLOL lot M 1 fm Y -' 1LNA c 11,7R,H I,w,w.N' In M,1LI/1.111 &fl1 &M ulOA It �., NA Mw IIIY IIIN WNA A,m.)1'I•M•M.Y M.M.M WIL11 LIU &117 LM, IYNA 23 'w 1,M 1.11 ' •+ 111 W Lt. /LmR M161S 1 m I0,N •; I,w,MLN ,NIX f.IN 1230001 42 150.112350 &Nl 23111 LM IYIMOL- M my N YRY1 m Mu W Y A ,501,5023" 1R,IIL61 I,M.M.N -, w,MLll &m l.w Lw NIFA M r' 11 M.161N; I,M,w.N I.M.NLN m.IN.11 L11 1.111 1907 1001 Q Nw IW 1L1. _A.' M,IO.N LIN ).w 1.00 IwIA 111 h 00501 IW 100461 WWR 7.117,w.N 7140.1,46 11111.0.0 1,11 I'M 1. M IlNh - 011161 w 10181 1.M.w.0 1,w,NLa' 11 1,w ' LIN 1.60 123(1[;%LL iow - cm,, R OLIN NM 1[111 IN mN YYt unim nmk 114 IN IR "W'sm,N I,w,M,N I.M.M,N 1.w ),m 7.w mom m s MM i1IfY11 R1Y{ 008 m K HI71A 1,N1.IaN 1,11,10.00 1•{11.50 i.w LIN &m 11710050 m NW RYLL R tw m H /IYII I'M.M &N I.w,w.M 1.1.001.50 231.501,50 )11,001.50 1.10 1.01 ).w H /.2350 )y 1611 ROt M W na W1111 7.7N,w.OL I,M,w,N 161.150," LIN 1.01 ].m Mr23r11 M 1,)00.00,00 1.10 /,MI ).w WIII17 I,w "Tilts w MUM 1,161,123.0 Lw.w,N I'M,"" /.507 7.00 12301 YR1film • N �[\ Nm 1 MIT IwYt Iw mil m Nor MUM 1,1,1.00 LM.w,M 1.00,00.00 LIN LM ).M Mom 37 `\ 1N17M ROLL UPS nail MO 8"m 41 I411,T ,Y WALM NN/.T1,0 &an 6.m Nil? 1(8.14 IM 0011 YRI HAA 136.501.0 IH,III.M L1H IQIl11Y11 M 1� 100,501.50 LM &111 Lw H /10011 7p Nw RIOT Ir nail MO ILHA 191.50).1 M.W.16 %$.ULU i um Ina OLA 1(RMtWIlmm 11230 m.M•H 105,40,11 Lw 23111 I'm N>a mE FUFW Yf 111111 IRMI w•701.OL M,w,N 18.442.42 1.IR /.m 1.IH H01A 11 usmm I.w 1.10 Lw 5011 1711, i lfCl IYR 881616 1[1LLL YM1 501110 wr/A 11.10,11 w -OL* 11 /1050 IN M,IILO Lm a -%, LM 111141 IM 70.501.16 MIT,, W.50LN ,231 I.w LC/ II10A L Now" w union /,00.11238 I,M.M,Y 1.00,111.91 6.01 LII1 wroR 11na 1[00011[{ li] Owl )NCI NN Rum 1[I1iN 171IIA {IMtYMIw 141,11150 N.IN.11 64./11,11.001 LlII LOT Wolin /,150 MN $1,61) 1101111/0 42RIA M,M.N 141.501.8 1,501.23 Lw 1.1:1 401 WILII I,m 0007 10000501 500101 4,111.11 07,123.1 00,11191 442.901.16 Lw LIU LW 11I1IA I,IN 1I,IMM 112.17116 LIN V.W 1.N, 50101/11 LIII "Tilts w N7M U 1.m.Y1.R 1,501,50].11 1.01,100.14 I.RI LNI 4111 100 4142 00'10110110 Owl 7.11 NLLt 1501823 0011 flwry "111.761.50 LM,M.N 1,913.112.11 1.123 LIM LIN 110011 1,171 NRI /IM an 1 Uxi, mg ,, 16• 4 Y III, W - I - Wt- 7N - NK M3 al w WA to ml elrwullsif x111 W. ff mom ^21 LM cm ava"m a I ip -: {-ice "7 nim 'nYYl7M IrOYiI 111LMfI1W. IA1 OMtlllll I OWN MI- Y NNIn M 1IIMMW • �" •MK( -: -. 1 ??� 1 mintnRt s 1e17n - lM Np1IlY M11AI i,U1 AaY . 700 f 7.7p. 76,00,11 II.IN.M '-x a wit f 1810 SWO MMM 1,123.123.17 ow r LM LM :76,000 ' IM,11' A . 7 MM Wo mom" LM W" YA7LN - Mn f4r�tl MIY IIY 1 171 pl23M Ip,M.M . u- L Mll mIO4 Y/M I/n ill LM „ 7M71M IN,M.M xxSS 1fTU 611 uM 111I7n 71000.00 I,/II.7KU IA»,m.M Ntt . .. - u7vingrlewll -nt NIMf IR7NI ndu,M.n M Iw[YIOIi LM Mlllll F,M.M R 0011 IMt Wti /M11s LM 6111100 5N.W ft � MlM Wi Nfw 001111 LM MIYp M,711.M ,1001 MYFM N1Al ..M N/I1M w.w.p MY mi ■11611 Ipwt 7.700 11/ILN W.ni v MR w111M mm 1.700 M00RI - "in M%TN WM 11 W 7.231 W" to."" 109mnt wl wu lur7 yll,rn.n I,u7dn.n n�M,m.n v :f1i lql 7Q1 MUTAp11YIM qmf Imm. 7.M.4LM MM VIII MV mi ti 1.117 1,00,000.00 WIMP IUQI W.1M111 MIN m r mim 1.1N 1,d,117.p I,/II.M.F In.M.71 M0I ®twu WwM IIIIRI 1 0,1,00.11 7,001,111.0 1 I 14 00111 11111111 WmY ItMA. 1,00,111.00 N231 w Ann mIw11Y LM W717Y I,M,Mu IA rum MR711=1 11723 gIMY WIU7 1,L1,IaM N7n nRIR 700 Will MY[ 1.00 WIIM 1,700,00.,1 I.lU,la00 rum 76R111>M NOW Wu1pI a, 7.W.M11 Nip nRN1 YY IM 1M 7.00 1,182,11 64.611.23 1 �' J�ia "-a��� -i(�- dw w�r�r arr/Ird ddF -J2 .. ti.�yr- o- ;.�,`r YF�d pii�'..r�1a :R1��1. �_= a[a�nr: � x t �'• .,, • �..a��R'LF•Jlly"S1. _ � � x �.1- .�y'" :` �'`?c., "3' � , � - 7y ^� i' . :. .. _� _ i•?F '$:��J�;.��y -y r1. Yt. i �I �• .43T•'.;.x�r. �,%':tt - .. �_ dr .r. - . • LSS��iLwJ:'. '��, . '. ..�1.'i'k.'�r�,•tr[Ilw.'r;N1Tlp • � �} r. '}Y4llMifttl ,� _ _ 1'`AV' ._ g�y, nR N47♦ 1 110 :i�iwr �;i' NKr w I,ynn r n:..1' d, •� IaNa � • . ¢R _ �Et 00 Now 1WIe 'n: ° ••]� InWO M1rd `1.1�ri.N .- 1, r i f" NM Y ■110 Kira' +' IIIH "WIN r10,, r }x. LIN' 1rM1.M •: , r INN tilrn~ is LM w loom � uM Nth _ I.N 1rN7 w ' Ir1rrN1.N { SUL MUMS amwUlm Ki-mm Nltrni I.IwrwLN ' 'i' _ LIIL1n.11 1®11er KWIKf • wcrn r • lnlw3m N NI,M.M M,W.N MR] Knows M t 1 nr111rr1.13 1r19r111'r Irin,Lin Nrwlmn S 1 b w,fflde . .WTrw tee 1 1. T1iflM d II[il m , t ti IIQ"" fwre Ul.MM fr• r.rl.. Vt116 G G1�a �aL {� 1., Y•Y•w•rw 4 4RM HYL [ [Tlf{,ffp •. -S. •: :` AII� -'f .i. Y.MN : L MAN* or motic"w" { :� 7` iAN. AM'f JwwA A OrrwW �. ttwlYw d TAMM OW lmmm m I IR Y YG` iY Tit• Cr m 1N. Il1W ""IAM 1 tfrr ;u. r.I.v r raAt f fuW.0 A CH O.qT Iw. S+A•W4.iedlYw 'Y+ S4 ...Ir�J.Iw•_a IA laarwo •".wrYrwW�r r a M M {TAR OW CAUFOt _ C." {•��JI.� 0.. Uif/N - i r•.+•w..rorw..+Yw......r.•w . rr. r... iu u•Yw.r�..rwY W..+. r.....`= i5 •r w w .rr .wr+•. �+ •• Y rYY rwrrY'Y• rrYY • r Y rwr•r r r w, m Y r ti r w ... IWY r/Ywr a r•r w .a• ••.rI rl .w a W .• w Y Mr.r ti. _Y Yw a 0 u n• •Y• •Y r w rf.•• � . wr.Y r• W Yw . Y� IY� Y Y Wwr• . •wr•N ri.. Y Y �A� .. Y r.YY •� M Y rwrY Y w' •V r M •ww•r rY•tr r wr�1 •.w Y � �\ w .MI w Yom. w Y •w r Y 4� w �� .Y+. Y � wr r/• iw wv 4 wWa w Y r •W w wM• Yvn i V a Y Yr�•.. r•• . wrY • wra.. •. W ••Y• w wrt.. u wJ..w W rw.. w n.J.w Y •� w •..Y rwYY. � w r.Y_ M .•s w• wY.. w Y...w.Y Y•,w• •Y• !� Il AWWUGM f1G11RM Af7CKAnm 1Y nmuwm Ix STATI d CAUS C.••b r_►ai.xW[wu AY•^ r— or._i/SL•, r. .... ...+. w a•.. w....r ... +.•Y...a. rY...r.�W ... •u r Y r rr.. r....+.. wr w r r........� •r.1 w w I•w1 �wwMW\ M rYY1 Y a• Y riw.+ r r W� 1A Y r ••W an wwYY• w •..•rr.' 1 wry w ► wY• /mow Y•. /�• w Ww. � •• w Wr•. a•• wwr 1.w. r r.n w wMwr y.•nw•a Ywr.14Y..r, IYY wY�In Ww•W rYr�•rw.YM �Y YNY�w. Yr.Y•W � r Y.�Y •.••a •w a• 4 �• YY I•.wy w W r .• •rMr M•Y•r Y Y Y• ��.. w I• . � • i M•a Y . ••r W .•w. w Y.w�w . w Y_I . YM• W .•Y. w •w4+r •w Y Y Yw. r1•� .w 1• Mr Y Y �. V w tr.,. a r rOy Ywr1 M Y Y.•w/. II IMWlOOM..ra If. Tr.vrtlr Uni+wf0 1414rY. Mwirfi .1 / j � 0.Nr wd1W F6. rfl, Wlf.DsW.r.rr U. orW AnsJM d {�.•M.Ma. a/f Y/af Conn MAAWO —... .1 / j � 0.Nr wd1W F6. rfl, Wlf.DsW.r.rr U. orW AnsJM d {�.•M.Ma. a/f Y/af Conn MAAWO —... Ma aa J- , 7— PSTM A Il, J tA' yi CHINA STAR RESTAURANT V] E •.4 9638 BASE LINE ROAD k Property Presently Zoned: Neighborhood Commercial > of Adjacent Property: V� Medium -Nigh Residential and Office ' •'v �i Low - Medium Residential and Neighborhood Commercial � Neighborhood Commerical r, Hest: Commercial Office APR: 202- 161 -40 k By: S. Ramirez q 11` FFDERRI. ,s w B4SELAJE R1 CHINA STAR RESTAURANT 9638 BASE LINE ROAD k Property Presently Zoned: Neighborhood Commercial Zoning of Adjacent Property: North: Medium -Nigh Residential and Office South: East: Low - Medium Residential and Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Commerical r, Hest: Commercial Office APR: 202- 161 -40 k By: S. Ramirez 11` dvtr� e _ ;y°•dar- a.1�vE- _tl.2' i.00.:�M vim`..:` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT v DATE: July S. 1988 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager SUBJECT: COO Tv LIBRA" ROMATIOM RESQNEIOATICN: Approve the appropriation of $40,000 from Reserves to account number 01 -4285- 6028, for the payment of the City's portion of the County Library renovation. BACKGROUND. During fiscal year 1987/88, the County committed to the renovation of the library located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. That renovation is raw complete and although the City committed to assisting in the cost of renovation, an appropriation from Reserves is required. This transfer fr.la reserves is requested so that it can be allocated to the 1987/88 fiscal year and affect June 1988 business. Pespectfully submitted, 471- *64"4c Eliza Stoddard Finance Manager ES:cm r *.Ks K Y. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: ADOtTIOM OF RESOLUTIDM AD MNQ THE DECLARATION OF TRUST OF �IIE O��f RECD MENDATIOM: The City Council adopt the attached resolution adopting the declaration of trust of the IOR Retirement Trust. BACKGROUND: The City has atlow.d employees to place their Deferred Compensation funds in either the ICMA program or the Great Nestern,Savings program. In 1987, the ICHA changed it's governing board structure to allow for the creation of a trust to allow better control by participating agencies. Very simply, the participating agencies elect the members of the trust and the trust helps determina policies for the handling of the Deferred Compensation funds. The attached resolution is the City of Rancho Cucamonga's statement of membership in the trust. By adopting the resolution, the City will be able to participate in the elections and policy development for the ICMA retirement program. Resppeecctfully, submitted, Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:cm 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI• OF RAKCHO:tiCUCANOKGA, CALIFORNIA.- ADOPTING THE DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE INTERKATIONAI. CITY KANAGENERT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT TRUST. WHEREAS, the Employer has employeas'rendering valuable services; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a deferred compensation,plan for such employees serves the Int2rests of the Eaplo)Fer by enatling�lt to provide reasonable retirement security for Its employees, by providing increased flexibility in his personnel management system, and by assisting* in the attraction and retention of competent personnel; and WHEREAS, the Employer desires that the investment of funds held under its deferred compensation Plan be administered by the ICKA Retirement Corporation, and that such funds be held by the ICVA Retirement Trust, a trust established by public employers for the collective investment of,funds fold under their deferred compensation plans and money purchase retirement pl.;ns. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Administrative Services Director, shall be the coordinator for this program and shall receive necessary reports, notices, etc., from the ICnA Retirement Corporation or the ICKA Retirement Trust, and shall cast, on behalf of the Weyer, any required votes under the program. Administrative duties to carry out the plan may be assigned to the appropriate departments. t� a• r' e; i• t: I 0 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6. 1988 f City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of a Resolution appointing Officers and Agents to accept Deeds on Behalf of the City (Superseding Resolution Ho. 82 -83) RECOMMENDATION: It is recoamended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution appointing officers and agents to accept deeds on behalf of the City. Background /Analysts Resolution No. 82 -83 appointed the City Clerk, the Deputy City Clerk, the City Engineer and the Senior Civil Engineer to act as officers and agents on behalf of the City. In 1982 we had one Senior Civil Engineer; our staff has Increased to four (4) Senior Civil Engineers and a Deputy Vity Engineer. The attached Resolution will appoint the Deputy City Engineer as an officer and agent and delete the Senior Civil Engineer from the same. ResAW" ted, < R : Attac hment N aM1 `WSJ. RESOLUTION N0. �jg'V16 R A RESOLUTION OF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO ACCEPT DEEDS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY (SUPERCEOING c RESOLUTION NO. 87 -83) L. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAtICHO CUCAMONGA DOES RE:OLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Government Code Section 27281 provides that: 1. Deeds or Grants conveying any interest in or easement upon real estate to a political corporation or governmental agency for public purposes shall not be accepted for retardation without the consent of the grantee evidenced by its certificate or resolution of acceptance attached to or printed on the deed or grant; and 2. A political corporation or governmental agency, by a general resolution, may authorize an officer or agent to accept and consent to such deeds or grants; and WHEREAS, for the benefits to be derived through expeditious processing of deeds or grants obtained by the City, it is de'.rmined desirable to authorize officers, and in his absence, an agent to accept and consent to certain deeds or grants obtained. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to Government Code Section 27281, that the following offices and agents: The City Clerk and the Deputy City Clerk The City Engineer and the Deputy City Engineer are authorized to accept and consent to deeds and grants to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Grantis deeds and grants including Offers of Dedication - — - 2. Deeds and grants previously approved for purchase by official action of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. U DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Walter C. Stickney, Associate civil Engineer Summary Vacation of an unused City Emergency Access Easement, located between Haven Avenue and Dakota Avenue, south of Victoria Street RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the varation of a City emergency access easement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to record sine. Background /Analysis The City has received a request from a property owner on Dakota A Aue, located east of Haven Avenue and south of Victoria Street, to vacate an unused emergency access easement. The easement was dedicated to the City in 1980 by the developer to be used as a secondary access from the tract to Haven Avenue during the various phases of the project. Upon completion of the development including the construction of a concrete block wall along Haven Avenue, the emergency access easement became no longer needed In addition to no longer usable. The owner of the property which this easement crosses has requested that the easement now be vacated. Section 8333 of the Streets and Highways Code states that local agencies may suanarily vacate (by resolution) Public Service Easements if the easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated for five consecutive years immediately preceding the proposed vacation. - The above mentioned easement was accepted by the City in 1980 and meets the summary vacation provisions of the Streets and Highways code. R4ly bmltted, RHM':WCS• Attachment ..�..�,. v ,J ;: ..`fti ✓`�^ -tee' ':� _ ° a: ;i:: 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO " CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A CITY EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT y WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1; Section 8333, of the Streets and - Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized k`: to summarily vacate a City emergency access easement herein more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found from all the evidence submitted that said emergency access easement, dedicated over five years ago has not been %. used tar its intended purpose. i.k NOM, THEREFORE, BE 17 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby makes its order vacating said emergency access easement as shown on Hap V -082 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described r in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit •A•, and by jar reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date this resolution is y recorded, —s—a —emergency access easement no longer constitutes a public service easement. t SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution— to�ecorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 0 ,I EXHIBIT W THE SOUTHERLY 20.00 FEET OF LOT 24, TRACT 9454, AS SHOWN CN A NAP RECORDED IN BOOK 146, PAGES 34 THROU34 36 INCLUSIVE OF HAP BOOKS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. c 0 0 VIGNYIY MAP '12000'CRI N m' °•S- �p 25 ;, x 26 EKISTI •NBA 6 ^fit .� &% o rot 14 Yb Yr 8 , ksl QyQ 26 �lu.' 4GCy�5$ � i 0 ml I it C i NA94 ' OE ry' V i 1 00 r,' b J I J o p 0 12618' I ::l. g �t JG 22 Nr tr r Q Ni I Ir l }„ SP 5917E1V l/ 4 .p V O NA942r20- G3EA1E0J EtJT � Z to ;s 1 fi6i EME/./T p WATCR LWE m is 78 h 0 j m Lit t' NU o •N U a 4 m r ' ! NAg4 20a i (~ ' N VIGNYIY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s ENGINEERING DIVMON % E7CiIIB1'p; � d N '12000'CRI N m' °•S- �p 25 ;, x 26 •NBA 6 .� rot 14 It Yr 8 , QyQ 26 23 ft v � i 0 ml I it C i NA94 ' OE ry' V i 1 00 �Q W I J o p 12618' I 8 27 S JG 22 Nr tr Ni I 5917E1V l/ NA942r20- G3EA1E0J EtJT s'goawaLK fi6i EME/./T p WATCR LWE m 28 0 _ml 21 R; I NU o •N 4 ! NAg4 20a 1 (~ O 123 oo ��mo 20 }_ Ip �� 2g n' .mc 20 NI � a•e654u C• c ml tl NI G I I /� "3' — T•19 G2 r . 574 r --033 _ hA94:20 � `.1 ioD 39 NE9'�2't 2'W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s ENGINEERING DIVMON % E7CiIIB1'p; � d N — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT A DATE: July 6, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 10941, located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Turner Development Company RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 10941 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis;Background Parcel Map 10941 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 23, 1987, for the division of 7.29 acres of land into 3 parcels in the General Industrial Development District, located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of Foui2h Street. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. Retpec y S/ ltted, !/ R . Attachments 36 aaag , 31 'TX RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION .THE CITY 'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF- RANCHO CUCAMONGA'. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10941 (TENTATIVE PARCEL:-MAP NO. 10941) I C 1 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number. 10941, submitted by Turner Development Corporation and consisting--of 3 parcels. located.on the north side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of Fourth Street, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of'Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Munber 10941 Is the final map of the division of land approved as shun on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirement, established as prerequisite to approval of ttvi final map by the City Council of said City have'now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City f Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 10941 be and same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 31 PSV 'J FIFTH STREET i x� c i k a �• F rF - iF--av 3 n I 11 ,� le II it I el O'. 11 i s II W II i 11 •� � � a II 11 J m II -IM —:L�t I IJ , Q I 1 aae u r� V FOURTH STREET CITY OF rrEK: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1rrM- PARCEL HAP 10941 ENGDJEF.MG DriMON E —4 -S Ye STUFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 <� TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13318, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita Drive, submitted by Mayflower - 8ayoun, a California General Partnership RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13318, accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tract 13318, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita Drive, in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 1986, for the division of 5 acres into 18 lots. The Developer, Mayflower - Sayoun, a California General Partnership, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improveiaents in the following amounts: Fay' ful Performance Bond: $231.800 Labor and Material Bond: $115.900 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementsry school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. Respg y s bmitted, Attachments 33 RESOLUTION NO. 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF •RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13318 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13318, consisting of 18 lots, submitted by Mayflower - Bayoun, a California General Partnership, Subdivider, located on tiie southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita' Drive , has been submitted to the City, of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance 0th the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meat the require ants established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map c,fering for dedicatiow for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFOR!, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of tr., y of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Hap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 3Y rr � •.� LL ♦i I.fP'� "1 , u .� • .r urr rr r IY� .rte `: �• .a8'� �" / i1 i .•`A ' r,i r,v1" ... I Nq fW/" l { t v.n.o. _ �J�Jtt • • `� to 11 !t C I 13 14 ID Ic • 17 Is �l I I • w1 7 1 i�r.� rr`� •"� , � �..e• CITY OF rrBM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ T(IACT 13318 _ ENGINEERING DrMON ERgIgl; DATE: TO FROM: BY. SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Techntclan a CUPr val of Improvement Agreement {Phase I ted and Improvement Security for Street,-19 between Lomita located or. st side sto submitted by Sierra Vista Oa of Jasper Baptist Church Street, RECCNEMDATION the City the subject agrethe enCity Council adopt resolution It 15 in ty Clerk to sign said a security and authorizing the ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND agreement. M�'or and CUP 81_19, located on the wost side of Jas and Sierra Vista Street, in the Low Residential Deveto approved by the Planning Co°gissfon on July Street, between Lonna Drive The Developer, Sierra Vista Baptist 22, 1981, ^t DiBtrict, was security to guarantee the Constructionuofh' 1s suWttin following amounts: the off -site improvements agreement and mprovements In the Letter Of Credit Faithful Perfornance Band: $20,460 Copies of LaSor "J " t,rfal Bond: $10,T00 Office. the agreement and security are avaliable in the City Clerl's_ Letters of approval have been received from school districts and Cucamonga County Water DistrlcL school the high ar- c elementary mentary Y �ubmftted, e � Attachments 3.6 .3 5LIM RESOLUTION NO. �S " q I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 87 -19 (PHASE 1) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, i= California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on ?' May 24, 1988, by Sierra Vista Church'as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the ;real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Jasper Street, between Lomita Or1ve and Sierra Vista Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said coonnjuncction with thetdeveloppme development reaalproperty,assreferred to in Commission, CUP 87 -19; and good and suffAlC entaImproveemment Security which secured and said by Improvement Agreement. NOV. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City_ Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 3 7 BASE LINE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A tl A' l e 1 •11 - 3g r V N� ME 7TI7 _, Eua 87-19 y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager a FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: goproyal of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 87 -52, located at 12434 Fourth Street, submitted by Pic 'N' Save Distribution Center IECOMMEIWTION It is recommended that the City Council adapt the atta:hed resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND DR 87 -52, located at 12434 Fourth Street, in the General and Heavy Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 1987 The Developer, Pic 'N' Save Distribution Center, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $210 000 Labor and Material Bond: $105,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Mater District. Resp f y ub ttted, G� :Ld:sd Attachments - 35 I RESOLUTION N0. 8S,490 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -52 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on June 10, 1988, by Pic IN, Save Distribution Center as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 12434 Fourth Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, 04 87 -52; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and stIfficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvemient Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. q6 Y J+ 't i _ p I lIIII' •' W I o i 111 I; I NORTH rr b PIC'N'SAVE BUILDING ADDITION 12434 FOURTH STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARCEL ONE PARCEL MAP 6668 ROOK 64 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY /\ NV �, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: f ` � 2187-52 fii Y ENGIIVEEMG DAWON EXBM". 3� DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r. STAFF REPORT July 6, 1996 a City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 6809 Hellman Avenue, submitted by Laszlo Vass RECOMODATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND 6809 Hellman Avenue, is a single family residence located on the east side of Hellman, south of 19th Street. The Developer, Laszlo Vass, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site Improvements in the following amounts: Savings Certificate Faithful Performance Bond: $6,200 Labor and Material Bond: $3,100 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respec u d, RHM:L h Attachments RESOLUTION NO. SS-Y{ ./ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 6609 HELLM4N AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed an May 26, 1988, by Laszlo Vass as developer, for the improvement of public right-of- way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 6809 Hellman Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Installation of such Improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thareof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by goad and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. s. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is �..` hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of ^ Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. I I _ Y3 I J L t L — . -9m lal�y arae[r -e�. to to ffK I lYC fL i W i i I 1 t 6809 ,., ©,,, V 34 fir, e fyKN �� I O i 1 1 ♦�fl !ti 'Y• 57• I 1 _ IN� Crry OF rra:- RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trr=. 6809 NELUTAN AVENUE WGINEMING DIMON EXM31 ;_ .ti c r. _. -. .. fii: °•t-ui('.;Y;- yryy'aa. -i n. �.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA t•�+_ STAFF REPORT r K: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: �. SUBJECr: c r. _. -. .. fii: °•t-ui('.;Y;- yryy'aa. -i n. �.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA t•�+_ STAFF REPORT July 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Seek, Engineering Technician Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13715, located west of Sapphire Street on the northeast corner of Exeter Court and Jennet Street, submitted by Walton Management Services, Incorporated RECOMME1DATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement, Background /Analysis Tract 13715, located west of Sapphire Street on the northeast corner of Exeter Court and -Innnett Street, was approved by the City Council on June 1, 1988. The Developer, Walton Management Services, Incorporated, is submitting an additional agreoment and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvement along Jennet Street in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond 519,000 Labor and Material Bond: S 9,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe submitted,, RHM: Attachment Y 1 0 RESOLUTION N0. p D `aO� v •" , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPR07EMENT�SECURITY FOR TRACT 13715 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on June 1, 1988, by Walton Management Services, Incorporated, as developer, for the improvement of ppublic, right -ef -way adjacent to the real property' specifically desoribedtherein,. and generally located west of Sapphire Street r on the northeast corner of Exeter Court and Jennet Street; And - WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said 7- Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to:be "done in - conjunction with the dev'elopment,of said real property as ref6red to Planning Commission, Tract 13715; and' WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said - Improvement Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, BE_IT.RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement, Agreement and said Improvement Security be And the same are hereby`approvcd and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement- oo,behalf'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City' Clerk to attest thereto. ` zlj-\- (40 w s x JENNET STREET 1 1 2 CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGMEE ENG DrngiON 7% TRACT hb. 13715 ^am= of Rmsom JENNEr ._-STREET nwL. Trra: TRACT 13715 Elm r V N M+ ` • 5 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA { •.4 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell i!. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect!�5 SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 85 -32, located on the north side of Civic Center Drina, east of Utica Avenue, submitted by Forecast Corporation RECIODO 110Wa It is recommended that the City Councii adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and . provement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DR 85 -32 were approved by the City Council on April 3, 1986, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $8,500 Labor and Material Bond: $4,250 The developer, Forecast Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Rep tf y submitted, RHIhiMGssj Attachments ' i ''v�xy3,.Ai,ji'' '`a' }iL� %.rv�' ss._•._ r,... . _. [� "- - }.J; O, W'1 :st, �A' U' =':1i .1.Y :'- `.'.I' - .4� .r•.j ,:.pia- .:r...- A��l'�� +' � - •�-r i1 ti'-�( s3 {� . s RESOLLITIOM,NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORVIA, APPROVING IYPROVENENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IYPROVEIENT SECURITY FOR DR 85 -32 WHEREAS, the aanIoprovemet AreemenExtension r, executed on July 6, 1988, by Forecast Corporation 'as developer,.for the i improvement of public right -of -ray adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side o7 Civic Center =, Drive, east of Utica Avenue; and - z WHEREAS, tie installation of such faproves~•nts, described in ssid' conjunction wggthtlentbject to the terms thereof, is to be done in N t development of said DA 85 -32; and WEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension' is secured, and Iby good and sufficient improvement Security, which is identltied in said Improvement Agreement Extension. _ NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said herebymauthorriizedStto sign saidnlmprorta nt +A hrtewent Extensionand eha�of is the City of Rancho Cucanonga, and the City Clerk to attest theretu. CITY OF RANCHO CU:,AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Haquire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Oiliiltnd, Public Works inspectev__!y_:�i, SU&1ECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extens'an for Tract 10246, located on the south+rest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue, submitted by Luther Alkhase9 RECOIIEJIDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Background /Analysis Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the constructioa of the off -site improvements for Tract 10245 were approved by the City Council on May 21, 1987, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: 1118,000 Labor and Material Bond: 1 59,000 The deteloper, Luther Alkhaseh, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp f '4!. ubmitted, Y ,ad Attachment x "r:'3 <T;:s..t`✓'�s' :ply.:,. r.�,w`:,i ,mk•. �.t+ �`.ri .�,(ct1 fi:�r49�..=� ..,i;'-, .'+'.. w�:' - Wf:. >: ,iC:� :�: � "• i'Mr.t"+•� 01 ZI ;,i�'a .)tom v RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION'OF THE"CITY'COUNCIL OF „THE CITY OF�RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORMIA,'APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ,AGREEMENT EXTENSION, AND IMPRovEMENT,SECURITY FOR TRACT; 10246 WHEREAS, the City Council Of•City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its considerationtan= lmprovement'Agrexment Extension executed on right6ofl�ay.adjacenteto thearealapropertypspeciflCel yidescrlbeditheretn,iand anderally located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue; Installation of such Viereo ,sis described conjunction with the development of said Tract 10246; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 15 hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ao� Y`• t y'. y 1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAb10NGA STAFF REPORT se- �t July 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector Rejection of all bids as nonresponsive to the needs of the City for the White Alder Tree Removal and Rep Jac eavmts in Tract 11934, located vest of victoria Park Lane an n U, of the Southern Pacific Railroad in the victoria d Plannor ed Community, and authorize readvertising of the project. To be funded from Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Account No. 41- 4130 -8769 with a loan from Beautification Funds. RECOPI EIDATION: It is recommended that City Council reject bids for subject project as being nonre3ponsive to the needs of the City and authorize staff to reseek bids for this project. Background /Analysis Per previous Council action, bids ware received and opened on June 3, 1988. The sole bidder's, Bopark Enterprises, bid of $104,100.00 greatly exceeded the Engineer's estimate of $25,000.00. Plans and specifications have been returned to the Landscape Architect for review and /or revision as necessari. Radvertising is scheduled for July 19 and July 26 with bids being opened at 10:30 A.M. on July 29. Respect ubmitted, m Attachment d �= CITY OF RAW= V)CA0 GA nw SIMWIT OF PROPOSALS OPENED ENGINEER' • ESTIMATE: 120,000.00 PROJECT Mite Alder Tree Renal and Replacement for Tract 11931 }� LOCATION: Tract 11931 BOPAPA ENTERPRISES SNNw1T: w TOTAL SUN OF BID (S) r W 104100.010 GATE: June 3. 1980 CONTRACT NO.: 0 A t A- RESOLUTION No. g8 -y015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE •WHITE ALDER TREE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 11934•, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE y. CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "White Alder Tree Removal and Replacements in Tract 11934" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 1s hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEAL ED_BIDS OR PRNIOSALS• Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10:30 o'clock A.N. on the 29th day of July 1980, sealed bids or proposals for the •White Alder Trees Removal and Replacement for Tract No. 119340 in said City. Bids will be opened and Publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form providea for the purpose, addressed to the-- - City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, •Bid for Construction of White Alder Trees Removal and Replacement for Tract No. 119344. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing per them the Department oflIndustrialvRelationsrof the State of is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem office such Clerk pprofathenCity 9320 Base rates of Rancho Cucamonga, file Line Road, S,5A RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,lob site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho 1 Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such - laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. F, Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the e Contractor or any subcontractor under him. v' Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship comnittee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the admin'stration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. 656 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. i The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho 3;• Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic r- employed III the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under f him, u• of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which arer workmaa, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more It (8S hours in violation of said Labor Code. Con L. -.tor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount wf said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the _ City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second Y lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The rmount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials ar supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. C_ • �} �. •:.=Y"`y��i.`�- `.,$``'.=.i.F�'y .yi- �� +-y, �5l • ",� +r�..r+` - R'r 'c`:t .:. �.a��i�U:'ti � RESOLUTION NO. ° PAGE 4 `L No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a'proposal form has not been issued by the Ctty.of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shill possess a Cliss "A" License (General Engineering;.' Contractor) in accordance with'ths' provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Gusiness'and Professions Code, Section 7000 et, seq.)sand rules and regulations adopted pursuanE thereto at the Lima time this contract is awarded. - The work is to be done in accordance'with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho.Cucraonga on file to the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 ease'Lino.Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. .Copies of the plans and specifications; available at the office of the City Enginder,: , will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and'payment of $30.00, said $30.00 is rom'efundable. Uppoon written request by,the bidder, copies of the plans and specificati will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreiebursable payment of $15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractbr, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities to lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of 19 sab ` i CITY OF RANCHO CUC.01ONGA STAFF REPORT, DATE: July 6, 1988 M lZ T0: City Council and City Manager C FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Michael 0. Long, Senior Public Nurks Inspector SUBJECT: Rejection of bids for the Tryon Street Sidewalk Project west of Archibald /.venue for being nonresponsive to the needs of the City and request permission to reseek bids for this project to be funded from Pedestrian Grants / Art 3 Account No. 16- 4637 -8717 RECOMMMATION: It is recommended that City Council approve rejection of bids for the Tryon Street Sidewalk Project, west of Archibald Avenue, and authorize staff to reseek bids. Background /Analysis Per previous Council action bids were received and opened on June 3, 1988. One bid proposal was received, from Bopark Enterprises, in the amount of $54,851.25. The Engineer's estimate was $43,847.00. At the time action is taken on this matter, a review of plans and specification will have been completed. Legal advertising has been scheduled for July 19 and July 26 with bids to be opened on July 29 at 10:00 A.N. Respec f fitted, We Attachment 1 1 .i, a i. t� CITY OF RNI o VXAV0N8A a SLMMAT OF M POSALS OM]IED.• * ENGINEER'S ESTDMTE: $17.647.00 r. MIQIECT TITW SIDM%LU {EST OF AMI MD AWK DATE: June 7. 1986 IOCATIQB: COMIAACT NO.. EApleeer's Est. )open EAterprlses r' SY81MT• TOTAL 3181 OF O56 (S) 4747.00 54651.25 Cl : 14 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.RANCHO ? CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE •TRYON STREET SIDEWALKS PROJECT-, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City' of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. ,V NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Construction of Tryon Street Sidewalks Project *. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans end specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS- Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of P.anclo Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.N. on the 29th day of July 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the •Construction of Tryon Street Sidewalks Proiect' in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Svite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, •Bid for Construction of Tryon Street Sidewalks Project". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality to which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per them wages are on file in the 55�. RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 2 office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested Party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Random Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such s laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached r contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the " provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code 4 as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as wended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor apprenticeship aptradesmen comittee nearestntheesite of occupation Public woks project and joint which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also oix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used to the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shat, not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent to the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or totally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the acmir ,tretion of apprenticeship programs if he employs registe••d apprent es or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other ,ntractors on the public works site are mating such contributions. 55� RESOLUTION hp, PAGE 3 requirThee ments and subcontractor under Of 777.5 and 1777.8 In the all comply with the Information relative to a gaPComplyt of apprentices. ether requirements may be obtelnedifceshl wage schedules, and afficfo the Main Of of A rent the eship ector op from the Division of Apprentfceshiprenticeshl Industrial Relations, P Standardspandaits branchoOfficesorn,a, or Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a workmen employed in the execution of this contract subcontractor under him shall cam legal days work for all State of California havin ply with and be and tie Contractor and any 2, Part ), Chapter 1 9 to do with working hours by the laws of the is amended. Article 3 of the Labor Code of forth In Division The Contractor shall forfeit the State of Criif -Ma Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars as a) ferr"4ctolabercit employed in the execution of the P a y oworkman. ano him' upon any of the work heroinbcontract, b hi ubcontr Which said laborer Y Aim or any subcontractor more than eight s workman• or mechanic is ' for each calendar Under g (e hours 1n violation oP required or day during said labor CadPermitted to labor, to execute Contractor agrees to pay travel and Payments are required by this contract sass Ptly to each workman in eccordareede defined In the applicable collectivesch travel needed Letor Code Section 1773.8, and suens file The bidder must submit With his bargaining agreements file) equal �toratl least sten bond payable to Pro is cash Cashier's s a eck, certified that the bidder Parcent (10X) of the y °f Rancho Cucamonga for to him, and in event enter Into the proposed contractsifdthed as a amount cash,er,s event failure to enter same is awarded City of Rancho Cucamongeed check, or bondishallubecocontract said cash, If the City Property Of the cityer0 tom, y of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract City or Rancho unt of the lowest bidder's contract lowest bid Cucamonga to the difference between the to the next lowest . and the surplus, if security shall be applied he the Y. stall be returned towthe dloowwesthbidder. ` contractafor °said work bshall beecniven to hundred Price thereof, and an additional bond secure n faithful performance of the (5�) of the contract percent (100X) of the contract Of claims far any for said work shall amount equal to ffft work contracted to aterialsbor su shall be given to Performance Cone done thereon pplles furnished for the performance ofaent work thatdAebcarriesactmr compensation be or egW�ed to furnishraof an work to be done under t whit atfon insurance covering Plo y kind said City of Rancho Cucamonga which ma g his em for thence him �dst�on S5�- DR W 'J R E SOLUTIOWN0.1 PAGE Z` V No'proposall Wil14;a�c3nsiderid.from a Contractor whom a propo a not been Issued bY,the City,,pf Rancho, Cucamonga. C ontractor,shall P6ssi$_S­a Class 'Aft-License (G&3eral Engineering-, Contractor)'in;acc6idance-with'the.',or6viitons of the Contractor',S'License Law (California Business and, Profess ions '!�-Code.�eSect Ion 7000 at. and regulations adopted -pu sugnt thereto at'�the time seq.) and,,rules Ir time this awarded. t S,contractis The work Is to he done In accordance with the profjles,:pTans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucawngh on.file in the Office of, the City Clerk at 9323 Base Line'Road, Rancho'Cucamongal,^ Callfornlaf- Copie's of the plans and sPeclflCattons.` available at,the Office 'of the City 'Engineer, will be furnished upon applicition"to t1le City -of Rancho Cucimonga and ,Payment, of $30.00, said $30.00 is -nonreftMdable. - Upon written reque'st by the bidder, copies "of`the plan . s and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment.1stipulated'above together with an additional nonraimbursable payment of $15.00'to,covc+ the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter Into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga., In accordance with the requirements of,Sect.lon 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in tha Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (pei1ot-mance'retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the , and ali bids. right to reject any By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California'. Dated this _ day of V I DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6. 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire. City Engineer Gideon V. Agra, Jr. Civil Engineer Authorize the advertising of 'Notice Inviting Bid's for the Archibald Avenue Widening Project between Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue to be funded fras Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22 -1637 -8755 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the plans and specifications for Archibald Avenue Widening Project and adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids'. Background /Analysis The Subject project plans and specifications have been completed, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's Estimate for construction is $168,000.00. Legal advertising will be scheduled for July 12, 1988, and July 19, 19814, with the bid opening at 2:00 PM July 22, 1988. Respect$ y submitted, RAHtf lttcrsent / cc: Purchasing a S,� °e ti RESOLUTION N0. U U r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'ARCHIBALD AVEiIUE WIDENING PROJECT', IN SAID CITY AND S, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. a WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. s NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Archibald Avenue Widening Project ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially to the following words and figures, to wit: °NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2.00 o'clock P.M. on the 22nd day of July 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Archibald Avenue Widening Project" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730• Bids must be made on a torn provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "Archibald Avenue Widening Project'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor 1s required to pay not less then the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per di a wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in ..ae office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 930 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job siitte. r. �/ The Contractor shall forfeit, as Penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeabte occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. 4hen the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. when the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less - than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or, journeymen in any apprenticea,le trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the puhlic works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him snall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. _ Sa' f. i, j Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all i' workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any if subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California i as aoended. "'• The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic a employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under ,• him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during )� which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (81 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed s% in accordance with Labor Cow" eaetion 1773.8. The b1djer must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Ranchn rnramonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (JOS) of try: amwzt of said bid as a - uarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awardea to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the awunt of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (10D%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (SD$) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any wo-k or labor of any kind done therron, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between hie and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class 'A' License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et, seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded 5/ i specifications atsOfthe'Ctty'of Rancho accordance Cucamo gs on fileiinsthelofficenof the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon appiicstion'to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment Of $25.00, said.$25.00 is nonrefundable. Uppoon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accoomapqaanied by payment stipulated above_ together with an additional nonreirbursable payment of $15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. _ The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon th'r Contractors request and at the Contractor's sole'cost and expense,, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retontion). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. r p; order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 6th day of July, 1998. h PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of tM_ City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ ddy of 1g I' ATTEST: er ADVERTISE OR or 66 v rc CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joal Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the •Notice Inviting Bids• for the Construction a Grove Avenue at 8th Street and Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project, to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8751 F.A.U. Section 203, Account No. 17- 4637 -8776 and TDA. Article 8, Account No. 12- 4637 -8783 RECOMIEIIDRTION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Construction of Grove Avenue at 8th Street and Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project, to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8751 F.A.U. Section 203, Account No. 17- 4637 -8776 and TDA, Article B. Account No. 12- 4637 -8783 and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the °Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by L.A. Wainscott and Associates, Incorporated, reWexed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction 1s $169,365.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for July 12, 1988, and July 19, 1988, with the bid opening at 2:00 P.H., Wednesday, August 3, 1988. Respe fu submitted, RHM'd . Attachment w -ST RESOLUTION N0. )�`'(L - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'CONSTRUCTION OF GROVE AVENUE AT 8TH STREET AND ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND THE SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING INPROVDIENT PROJECT' IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specification, presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the pins and specifications for 'Construction of Grove Avenue at 8th Street and Atchison. Topeka and the Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution cf the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 3rd day of August 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Construction of Grove Avenue at 8th SLreet and Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project' in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read irtmediately in the office of the -- - City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Grove Avenue at Bch Street and Atchison. Topeka and the Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the - �a RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Bass Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the fob site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as enalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.004 for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention 1s directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship cannittee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprentice:hip program to that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to ,journeymen to such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or _ B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered a prentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor 1s _qulred to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprentiiceship programs if he employs registered 0 ern ConseacsorsuonenenpuslicywoRsestteeareema�sng suc�iucon €rtoucr{ons. if 63 RESOLLTION NO. PAGE 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.6 and 17.7.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and otirr re ;,Areaents may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex ifficio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division o7 Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall c stitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mec)anir employed In the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (81 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined dain the hode�Section 1 e collective bargaining agreements filed n The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second -- - lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50% of given fatheent work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor w4ll also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. r Vn A ♦ ; C ft RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rmumcho Cucamonga. Contractor shall Possess a Class •A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, - Section 7000 et. seq.)-and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in'accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho,Cucamaonga on file in the - Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road; Rancho Cucamonga, California.' Copies of the plans and specifications- available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 said $35.00 is nonrefundable. Uppon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional renreimbursable payment of $15.00 to cover the cost of mailing che"es and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca ifornia, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 1988. 'I DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S: FF REPORT July 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Works Inspector Award the Sapphire Trails Landscaping and Reconstruction improvement Project located South of Banyan Street, to Joe Hale Construction Cmpany, Incorporated for the amount of $81,596.00 to be funded from Beautification Fund, Account Nos. 21.- 4647 -8723 RECOMMUDATI0N: It is recommended that City Council award the Sapphire Trail Relandscaping and Reconstruction Project to Joe Hale Construction, low bidder, with a low bid of $61.596.00 to be funded from the Beautification Fund, Account Nos. 21- 4647 -8723. It is also recommended that Council authorize transfer of funds from Beautification Fund, Account No. 21- 4647 -8845 to make up the difference between the original expenditure authorization and project expenditures. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS ^er previous council actions, bids were rejected and permission was granted to seek new bids. Four bids were received with the tow bid, 581,596.00, still exceeding the engineer's estimate of $52,000. However, as this is the second attempt in seeking proposals, staff feels rejecting all bids and seeking new proposals, will result in proposals of similar amounts. ARespectfu y u bmitted, Attachment cc: Purchasing 0 . a- ;yv�y-';�.v- •�'= "u'_'ti °. - •r'n4�4.`= ..i}'�?; - ,' -.:t%_ _i?- ;+*�.:: �.- •`ci- +l#i� "v "��'eT„5...-.e }Lt.'�yf ... 'V S ,.} �,..'1 '"r <: .F,.i 7 ;,�•�yn �t.$`.a,;!:r "3 {' .: ,' Ctrl WP RANLIq COCA,0r;A._. re, F" 51PRNM OF /IpO1N$'OIEUFD ENSINEER'SEMMAEL.552,000.00.r' PROJECT SAPPHIRE TRAIL tA%CA►iMU AND PECWLCEMIOM -. DATE: - June 27, 1208 LOCATION: CONTRACT OD.: JOE HALE BOPARA ENTER. BRUCE PAYING BOWIM COYST. SUM M: TOTAL AJN CF 010 (i) 01.100.00 9!,233.60 115,02!.00 I17,E07.00 TOTAL SM OF ALTEAKATE (it 496.00 BOOM MOO 560.00 6RAN0 tma CS) 81.5%.00 99.233.6* 115,717.00 E18.375.00 Error In calculatten on tAS Part Of 00park Enterprises V r N - 'r e- i "-•��4Gny'tl �1�` ',;a .-_ _ .�- vr.+,. .ay<.• a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA -MA." STAFF REPORT ,r:�cMl DATE: July 6, 1988 � TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Bf: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project at Highland Avenue and Mi liken Avenue awarded to Honey Electric, Incorporated, for the amount of $90,000.00 ($81,332.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from TM Article 8 Fund - Account No. 12- 4637 -8708 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $90 000.00, ($81,332.00 plus l0% contingency) to be funded from TDA Article A Fund - Account No. ;2-4637-8708. Background /Analysis On June 1, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Hovey Electric, Incorporated. Staff has received from Hovey Electric, Incorporated, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be comolete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Resp 1 matted, RHM:JL:jh 4 cc: PurchaYi g - Gg v n •ye r.!+, sy6,iY.'- `'.'.+1 it`".`Y„�it Fir,`. "�✓ ..� ...: ¢w.ys:_v; t _,�.� ��:, . _ k Y � CITY OF RADICHO CUCAMONGA r' r STAFF REPORT A•i . t DATE: July 6,-1988 L;i C TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II Improvement PrWect, located from Foothill Boulevard to f 6th Street, awarded to 8 -1 Cnterprises Corporation for the amount of'337,650.50 to be funded from Pedestrian Grant-c Article 3, Account No. 16 -4637 -8716 ; RECOMME110ATION: It is recmmended that City Council authorfze the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase _ II Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $37,650.50 to be funded from Pedestrian Grants Articl3 3, Account No. 16- 4637 -9716. Background /Analysis On June 1, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to B -1 Enterprise Corporation. Staff has received from 8 -1 Enterprise Corporation executcd contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found tham to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. A y Su ttted, cc: Purchasing i; t, DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: ' a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT . July 6," 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Joel Lazo,-Jr.'Civil Engineer Execute contract for the Slurry Seal Program, Phase II, F.Y: ;81 /8VImproven<ent Project awarded to Pavement Coating Company for the amount: of $73,100.00 ($66,384,'66 plus 10% contingency) to*be funded from SB 300 Funds - Account No. 15- 4637 -8050 5. RECO1MOKTION: t ¢ It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Slurry Seal Program, Phase II, F.Y. 87 -88 Improvement Project; and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $73,100.00, ($66,384.66 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from SS ?DO Funds, Account No. 15- 4637 -8050. rm 'n Background /Analysis On June 1, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Pavement Coating Company. Staff has received from Pavement Coating Company, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respec 1 5 ted, i d RHH!JL: cc: PurchaAng ..q i RECWlFNDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to . execute the contract documents for the Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services > Director to expend $475,600.00 ($432,360.80 plus 10% contingency) to be C- funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8748 and ` City -wide Drainage Fund, Account No. 23- 4637 -8802. '4 5 ie Background /Analysis ' i On June 1, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated. Staff has received from Laird Construction Company, Incorporated, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and r it accordance with the contract proposal. Res D ly tted, :JL:s cc: Purchasing r — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "' 1 STAFF REPORT' DATE: July 6,•1988 TO: City Council and City Manager - 3 FRON: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer r BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer r3 SUBJECT: Execute .Contract for the Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project, located from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue, awarded to Laird Construction Company, Incorpo.ated, for the amount of $475,600.00 ($432,360,80 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8748 and City -wide Drainage Fund, Account No. 23- 4637 -8802 RECWlFNDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to . execute the contract documents for the Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services > Director to expend $475,600.00 ($432,360.80 plus 10% contingency) to be C- funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8748 and ` City -wide Drainage Fund, Account No. 23- 4637 -8802. '4 5 ie Background /Analysis ' i On June 1, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated. Staff has received from Laird Construction Company, Incorporated, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and r it accordance with the contract proposal. Res D ly tted, :JL:s cc: Purchasing r T DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OP RANCHO QUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT R, July 6,•1988 City Council and City Manager Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer Execute contract for the Lion Street Improvement Project, located between Atchison,-.1opeka_ and Santa Fe Rallroadi and Ninth :Street,- 'awarded� to J.E.G.' Construction; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 ICJ( TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Jcel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SJJBJECT: Execute contract for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project at Highland Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue awarded to Hovey Electric, Incorporated, for the amount of $102,600 ($93,255.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from TDA Article 8 Funds' - Account ho. 12 -4637 -8707 RECONIEiIORTION: q -, It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services r; Director to expend $102.600.00, ($93,255.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from IDA Article 8 Fund - Account No. 12 -4637 -8707. 3• Background /Analysis On June 1, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project Sy Hovey Electric, incorporated. Staff has received from Hovey Electric, Incorporated, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Resp Witted. �— RHM:J y//t, cc: Purchasing �'_ 73 1 �m s. n�- c -= CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July-6,1988 1'Y TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Construction of Maintenance Facility Improvement Project at Ped Hill Coavaunity ,Park awarded.,to Bopark Enterprises. Incorporated, for the amount of 5152,900.00 ($139,000:00 plus IOS_ contingency) to.be funded from Capital Improvement Facilities, Account No. 01- 4647 -7043 (FY 87/88) RECOM ENIXTIOH: It is recocmended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Construction of Maintenance Facility Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $152,900.00, ($139,000.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Capital Improvement Facilities, Account Ho. 01- 4647 -7043 (FY 87/881. BALKGRDUND /ANALYSIS On June 1, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Bopark Enterprises, Incorporated. Staff has received from Bopark Enterprise„ Incorporated, eKccutrl contract documents bonds and insurance documents; reviewed then and f d them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Re Al submits a, C"/ A, YY R R . ,V HM: J� cc: Purchasing �Y 0 i . m— L E¢ a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT r>, DATE: July 6, 1988 , T0: City Council Lid City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT, Execute contract for the Etiwanda Storm Drain Line 2 -1. Phase I Improvement Project, located west of 1- 5, north of Victoria Street from the Victoria Basin to north of Highland Avenuo and future Route 30 Fr =eway, awarded to Albert N. Dav;es, Incorporated, for the amount of 5657 Drainage Fund 10% contingency) to be funded,. RECOMEP.BATIOR: it. is recommended contract h tdocumenouncil theoEttwanda Storm Drain, i Liner2 -1• Phase I Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services SW funded from Drainage Fund �AOCCOUnt9No.31 637u8154. contingency) to be Director to Background /Analysis On June 1. 1,,ba' City Council awarded the subject project to Albert W. incorporated. Staff has received contract documents. bonds and insurance udacuments; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposer. Res a tnitted. cc: Purchasing i _~Y4'4 3Y - 'vy�yl9Fyi j JrEY, �- ..9 1 y iV.r. .e _�br •�� r. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution .0 approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and r Dedication between Clarke H. Boesen and Marjorie C. Boesen. BACKGRDUID /AN&YSiS: ' The attached subject Agreement between th. City and Clarke H. Boesen and Marjorie C. Boesen provides for the construction of street Improvemants which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approach, street light and street pavements along the Soesen's 19th Street frontage. Mr, and Mrs. Doesen have agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of 19th Street in return for the construction of said improvements, rather than receive monetary compensation for the land dedicated and pay for the street improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Amethyst Street at 19th Street Improvement Project. Respectfully submitted, RHM :J m Attachment W — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhlONOA STAFF REPORT Date: July 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager R3 From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: _ John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer- Subject: Approval of Agreement, for Installation of—'Public Improvement for ,. Dedication,'between Clark.:'',-H. Baesen, and Marjorie C. Boesen and:, the, City of�Raneho.CucAmenga`.for Street Frontage Improvements along 9529 Nineteenth Street, located on 'the mouth side of 19th Street between Archibald Avenue and-Amethyst Street. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution .0 approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and r Dedication between Clarke H. Boesen and Marjorie C. Boesen. BACKGRDUID /AN&YSiS: ' The attached subject Agreement between th. City and Clarke H. Boesen and Marjorie C. Boesen provides for the construction of street Improvemants which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approach, street light and street pavements along the Soesen's 19th Street frontage. Mr, and Mrs. Doesen have agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of 19th Street in return for the construction of said improvements, rather than receive monetary compensation for the land dedicated and pay for the street improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Amethyst Street at 19th Street Improvement Project. Respectfully submitted, RHM :J m Attachment W d .c :'rt;. _:.;: ...•�.3t.v�'fr�'= ��a±^�'�n°�i�� `- ;y��:rr._,: .,- -- -.... - °y7 ?__- ��%o-Miswn`--_ „ice ^fin - ''9 tiro .J RESOLUTIO-N N0. A RESOLUTI4'bFA4 CITY•'COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF RANCHO-CUCANUGA, CALIFORNIA,-ACCCPTING AN, AGREEMENT FOR'INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM CLARKE H: BOESEN A9D MARIORIE C. BOESEN;--AND,'AUTHORIZING,THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME established requirtients the constructto Of-the City off Rancho Cucamonga has conjunction with the Amethyst Street and Nineteenth Street Project; and street lights andRstreetnppsavewntsnlocatedbaiongt9529d19th Street Moshe made part of the Amet?Wst and 19th',Streets Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, Clarke H. Boesen and Marjorie C. Boesen have voluntarily agreed to dedicate deficient street Right -of -Nay along 19th Street at 9529 Nineteenth Stroet..c City of RanchoNCucasar .W�ACalifornia,EdoesEaccept said of the authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sax, and directs the City Clerk to record sax in the Oflice of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. z F S 11 77 I 5 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORTy`:` _ Date: July 6, 1988 vk)t To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: He,.ry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 5 (C.O. 87- 20) for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Greek and Associates to continue design administration for the Alta Loma Assessment District 84 -2. It is recommended to expand their contract by $10,000.00 to bring their contract total to $29,752.00. It is hereby recommended to execute Change Order No. 5 with Don Greek and Associates for continuing design administration for the Alta Loma - Assessment District 84-2. BACKGROUND /ARALYSIS- The firm of Don Greek and Associates was engaged to perform predesign studies for four projects, including 19th Street - all four phases, Alta Loma Assessment District, Banyan Street Bridge Extension, I -15 /Route 60. It is now found necessary to expand their contract to cover the additional workings encountered. The Change Order is for the amount of $10,000.00 to bring the Alta Loma Assessment District contract to $29,752.00 to be paid from the various project funds. Respectf4py—obmitted, RHM_ Attachment /O I ENGINEERING SEhYICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER TOATRACiFO r er o,. S CONTRACT ADIMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 8A -2 r. (ALTA LOMA STORM DRAIN CHANNEL) —aim— T0: En-9 neer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for i engineering services. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARD CONTINUING ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES _I RISE in Contract Price In Contract Price 10,000.00 TOTAL 10,000.00 JUS11riCATIOU ' INTERIM ENGINEERING STAFF ASSISTANCE TO COMPLETE BUDGETED PROJECTS The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sum of: TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS Dollars (S 10.000 The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: rwrwry u,Y THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY TWO Dollars (S 29.752.nn The Contract period provided for completion will be (Increased) (Decreased) (Unchanged) _ Days This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Raquestzd: x� �y�y us e r :ay_ rt rt9 ne ate .1cce,t2d. 6 -I 88 Engineer _4 5 at 'e approved: Mayor, City or anc o Luc3monga uate iiis information will e ustd as record of any changes to a ori—qFna-1 engineering,,, oir+ =-ant dated: M ! _ - w -. � ��N '_i�: h:�:`s;:rr'�ati :� -7 ° .'i _ _ f.i4.`•'�- "" _,y�y.:� Iy:,�: r 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I (Ile Date: July 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 3'(C.O. 87- 20) for a Professional Services Agreement with Don--Greek and associates to continue design administration for Banyan Street Extension. It is recoaaaended to expand their contract by $5,000.00 to bring their contract total to $18,799.50. It is hereby recommended to execute Contract Change Order No. 3 with Don Greek and Associates for continuing design administration for Banyan Street Extension. The firm of Don Greek and Associates was engaged to perform predesign studies for four projects, including 19th Street - all four phases, Alta Loma Assessment District, Banyan Street Bridge Extension, I -15 /Route 80. It is now found necessary to expand their contract to cover the additional workings encountered. The Change Order is for the amount of r $5,000.00 to bring the Banyan Street Extension contract to $18,799.50 to be paid from the various project funds. r` Respect pbmitted, R . Attachment r'c C �f Jtt F lffi..ry: y. w x 8 SEWCES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR BANTAM ST. EXTENSION AND REALIGNMENT PROJECT. 1820 TO: DON TR °FR "j ASSOCIATES Engineer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement fot engineering services. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AND CONTINUINC: ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES in Contract Price TOTAL. In Contract Price $5000 00 $5000.00 JUb[Ir I INTERIM ENGINEERING STAFF ASSISTANCE TO COMPLETE BUDGETED PROJECTS The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sum of- FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS Dollars (S 5000.00 r Tqe Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be:Eighteen Thousand even Hundred Hinety Nine and 50/100 Dollars (S 18,799.50 The Contract period provided for completion will be (Increased)(Decreased) (Unchanged) Days This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will appl. hereto. Requested ,^, uss t r gutr y ngtneer ate V ^^ I 6 -16 -88 — Engineer V Date :p ?roved. ? / �Tiayo ity of Rancho o ucamonga Oatri a US intonation will fie used as record of any changes t0 the original eng neenr P;r: =_-ant dated: 3, it -d 7_ 60 8L2.0 ME jo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 NW-0- TO: City Council and City Manager WX FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gillilrsa, Public Works Inspecton2sii:7-s- SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completions RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13062 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $26,100, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the arsount of 1261,000. Background /Analysis Tract 13062 - located on the north side of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archibald Avenues. DEVELOPER: Lincoln Property Company 17011 Beach Boulevard 11400 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 126,100 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 1261,000 ` Respec f submitted, RNM: i Attachment G � 0 x ti 1` xeSOLUTlO4 NO. A RES6LUTION OF THE'CJ1w'Y'COU*CIL OF THE CITY DF"a4CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORM14. ACEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13062 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING DF,A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR 11HE WORK WHEREAS. the construrtion of public Improvements for 'rract 13062 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and W.EREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work comolete. NOV. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the,work is hereby accepted and the City Enginger is authorized to sigi and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /1'7� 3�3 7 — I - — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT''/° v DATE: July 6,.1988 yam' TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectq�t SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion xr RECO910 0ATIOM: b' The required street improvements for OR 86 -14 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said ?' andrauthorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful HPerforman a Bond In the amcunt of $2,500.00. r Background /Analysis rr OR 86 -14 - located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Civic i1 Center Drive Y• DEVELOPER: Haven Investors I a 10670 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91710 Y t Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $2,500.00 Resp f submitted, C, RNFF:SFM - - -- Attachment 8y 'yd ;■ ;0 P ME , jmmm RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 86 -14 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOW WHEREAS, the construction of public I rOvemnts for DR 86-14 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS. a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work Is hereby acceptei and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the county Recorder of San Bernardino County. ME , jmmm �c a Y� V� s -+ y c: a i — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto.7 SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECONWROATIOM: The required street improvements for Tract Nos. 12670 -1, 12670 -2, 12670 -:t and 12670 -4 have been completed ih an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $82,995, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $829,953. Background /Analysis Tracts 12670 -1, 12670 -2, 12670 -3 and 12670 -4 - located on the south side of Base Line Road, between Spruce and Milliken Avenue^ DEVELOPER: Lewis Hanes of California P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 82,995 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $829,953 Respectful 'submitted, /• SMG: s" Attachment SG a t :nom -�..,� k��.r,'�'4z:`.-; =.�„ -• �<. RESOLUTION NO. S8, V,3a -- , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 12670 -1, 12670.2, 12670.3 AND 12670 -4 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 12670 -1, 126700 -2, construction 12670 -4 haveibeen improvements to theasatisfaction of the City Engineer; and - WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. the City EngineerrRis�authorizedrto sign that the work is a Notice ofrCbompletionawi with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /I,- lt� �r .. — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT" DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Cicy Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec a SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street iRProvements for Parcel Map 8842 have been completed acceptable u riitn haCle mn accept Improvements, authorize the City Engineer notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bona ;n the amount of $02,000. Backgrund /Analv.is Parcel Map 8F42 - located on Terra Vista Parkway, east of Spruce Avenue DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes of California P.O. Box 807 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $82,000 YSMG-u submitted, sd Attachment D RESOLUTION NO. 2 %-�53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROYENENTS ` FOR PARCEL MAP 8842 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK r WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 8842 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and ;'.• WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work conplete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with >, the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. A L �l a^I l t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ., yaI ', STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 as, T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector?_ SUBJECI: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECD MLATIOM: The required street improvements for Tract 11577 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $4,900, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $49,000 Background /Analysis Tract 11577 _ located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Base Line Road DEVELOPER: Lane and Associates 902 W. 9th Street Upland, CA 91786.4542 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 54,900 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 549,000 Respect submitted, RHM: :ad Attachment - 9d 4 1. M j 1 s w 7 RESOLUTION No. 88 -454 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlgNGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IKPROVE14ENTS FOR TRACT 11577 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 11577 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. _ 9/ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect C--p Release of Bands and Notice of Completion RE DA ION: The required street improvements for Tract 12833 have bees an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Counc Improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in $64,936, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performan amount of 1649,360. Background /Analysis Tract 12833 - located on the southwest corner of victoria Park Lane and South Victoria Windrows Loop Accept: DEVELOPED: The William Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue, Suite 9 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $64,936 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $649,360 4Respe "17y s ubmitted, Attachment - �a I r E,. RESOLUTION N0. g� -�f3s k. A RESOLUTIMI OF :THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO °• CUCAMONGA, CALIFORHIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS �+ FOR TRACT 12833 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF ir`• COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public ioproveients for Tract 12833 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and tt WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, 'hat the :ark is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. �;1 k' — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspegtor� SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATIoN: =r a The required street improvements for Tract Nos. 10802, 10802_1, 10802 -2, !0802 -3, 10802 -4, 10802_5 and 10802_6 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it 1s reccmrended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds. Background /Analysis Track Nos. 10802, 10802 -1, 10802 -2, 10802 -3, 10602 -4, 10802 -5 and 10802 -C - located on the southeast corner of Mountain View Drive and Spruce Avenue DEVELOPER: Lewis Hexes 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Release: Accept: Resp 1p ryitted, RKK. Attachment 4?y f Faithful Performance Maintenance Guarantee Tract Bond (Street) Bond (Street) 10802 6 620, 10802 -1 605,400 60,540 - - 10802 -2 253,000 25,300 10002 -3 77,000 7,700 10802 -4 123,000 12,300 10802.5 184,000 18,400 10802 -6 276,000 27 600 Resp 1p ryitted, RKK. Attachment 4?y f .�� RESOLUTIOY N0. $ g' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO S, CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENT.S FOR TRACT NOS. 10802, 10802 -1, 10302 -2, 10802 -3, 10802 -4, 10802 -5 AND 10802 -6 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING ?' OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK h,. WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract Nos. 10802, 10802 -1, 10802 -2, 10802 -3, 10802 -4, 10802 -5 and 10802 -6 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and sr WHERE, A Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFa S, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Berna•dino County. r lit 9s YF n i nam + DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhtONGAkr,� STAFF REPORT ` July 6, 1988 t ,HM City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve H. G111iland, Public Works Inspetto - Releese of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12 located on the scuthwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue REC31MMITIOW: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects to materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Western Properties Post Office Box 670 Upland, California 91766 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) SA759 Respee )y submitted, G � RFbhSyR'`i -- c f i m� Dates To: Proms By: Subject: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1988 Mayor, Members of City Council and Cityonager Joe Schultz, Community Services ManagerF- Dave Leonard, park Project Coordinator Addition of Land to the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center The Park and Recreation Commizsion recommends that city Council authorize the entire purchase of Paresl AM 209-C41- 17 immediately adjacent and northeast of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center. Surplus land not required :jy the Engineering Departmon_ for the Arrow Route and :apina Strout widening, will be funded by the Park Development Fund 20 with the land to be used for future n,cpansion of the Neighborhood Center parking area. The cities Engineering Department is coordinating with a private consultant to acquire missing right -of -way on Arrow Routa }+etween Arcbibrld Avenue and Hermosa Street. Completion of the project will ultimately develop Arrow Route to full design street width. One of the propertiee needed for the widening is adjacent to the cities Neighborhood Center (Exhibit A). The Parcel (APN 209- 041 -17) is configured rectangularly 35 feet wide by 200 feet deep and contains two single family hemes. Tho consultant proposed two alternatives to acquire the land (Exhibit B). First, purchase of only the 60x85 foot portion of the property roquirod for the street widening. The estimtte coat to purchase the land and relocate the affect single family residence was set at $42,000.00 or $8.23 per square foot. The second alternative, would be to acquire the entire parcel and surplus the excess property. The coat utilizing this approach is estimated to bu $106,500.00 or $6.26 per square foot. .. rr Addition of Land to 3cNc July 6, 1988 Page Two The Park and Recreation Commission at their Juno 16, 1988 meeting reviewed the second option offered by the consultant. " Raced on the need for additional parking at the Neighborhood - Center and tho opportunity-to acquire the property at this tint, which would probably_ not be available in the future, the Commission recommends City co=ol authorize the total Purchase of parcel APN 209 - 041 -17. The estimated cost for the property surplus to the Engineering Dapartments needs is ' u8tizated at $64,500.00. Monies are available from the Park Devalopment Pund account number 20- 4532 -8808 to fund this Purchase. JS:DL:bs _ 9F t rr %i it ;y= r 4�� r� Ld r �• _• 29 - �•Qlinw .I i t I 208 U C 1 \ ° PROPOSED ADDITION L' A _FL,VE °T 2 jNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER -.. AG �. �•� aZ : EXHIBIT A CITY OF P.ASCHO CCCA.NIO \GA — 'VE lNI ORA1vD UlI Date: March 31, 1988 To: Bob Rizzo, Assistant Citj Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Subject: Arrow Route Widening, phase II froo-Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Street (Neighborhood Center) The Engineering Design staff is presently working with a real estate ac ;u.sftion consultant from Long Beach, John Cutler, Inc , for obtaining missirg rights -of -way on the subject project. One such parcel is acknowledged as the Wooten parcel. This parcel is adjacent and ic- -adiately east of the Neighborhood Center an Arrow Route at Medrone. The appraisal for the Aooten parcel provided too (2) scenarios; one a Staff hasealsod requested John Cutier,itnca -to be for the either- the negotiation process. If the entire parcel 1s a •take" we will have two (2) tenants to deal with and two (2) houses. As you will note on the attached appraisal summary, once dedication 1s made for Arrow Route and Alpine Street, the remainder could be incorporated into the Neighborhood Center as discussed, or be sold as a developable residential lot. RMM:JLM:pam I k t�L.eeL e, It F,; r 5-o + 0,14 �ioti i Qe�oc4`16h 6-ea{-f, c�ga!od t�z)4e�iu�s��o, Ee�ou,�rva l( t r 7 I � - EXHIBIT 13 C Soc M' Land PART MAIZE DESCRIPTION .i The following legal description of the part to be taken was prodded by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The north 60 feet of the -west 65 feet of the ::arth 200' feet of the west 1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Sectior 11, Township 1 south. Range 7 west. San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to 'Map of Cucamonga Lands, as •oer plat recorded in Book 4 of 'Maps, Page 9, records of said County. The total area of the part tare is estimated to be 5,100 square feet. 1. consists of an area in the shape of a square that is 60' x 85' with 85 feet of frontage on Arrow Route (see 13hoto and map an opposite page). Improvements The part to be taken, as descrbed above, will extend =60 feet south from the present northerly property lice. The Residence No. 1 N set back =47 feet from the northerly property line putting it partially within the part to be taken. Because it will be taken, all other improvements related to Residence No. 1 will also lie taken. Residence No. 2 and We attached carport do not fall within tte take area and therefore will not be included here. Residence No. 1 is a 2 bedroom, 1 full bath home with hallway, kitchen, dining area, living and utility room, 120 square foot basement with 21 square foot outside entrance; a 1 car attached parking slab, 121 square foot pa tially covered patio; 26 square foot front porch; 175 linear feet of 4' high chain link fencing with 4' wide gets; and same parts of uther 6' high chain link fencing (more thoroughly described on page 19 of this report. Vegetation within the take area includes (12) 15 gallon Yuccas, (10) 5 gallon _ rose bushes, (1) large Beavertail cactus, (1) 5 gallon holly bush, (2) 1 gallon and (1) 5 gallon wax leaf scrubs, (3) 15 gallon trees, (1) 5 gallon Olive tree, (4) large miscellaneous succulents and 3,200 square feet of grass area. 03.87.318 33 !o� r � - s N Y PART TAIM VALUATION' Land i- Value of t):a part taken is estimated by the pro rata value of the land as given in the Cost Approach to Value. Part Take (5,100 square feet Q S 2.20 per sT.:are foot) . 511 220.00, say 511,150.00. Impr+avements Cost\ew Contributory Item Doecrinflon rose Denrocintion Vnl[1A 1 Residence No 1: 864 sq.R. w/ $ 43,00.00 2 bedrooms, l full bathroom Less 50% S 21,600.00 a Front Porch S 100.00 a 26 square foot concrete slab Less 2540 $ 75.00 Is. Basement -120 square feet $ 2,500.00 with 21 sq R outside entrance Less 25% S 1,875.00 c. Patio -120 square foot $ 250.00 partially covered concrete slab Less 2590 $ 157.50 d. Parking/Storage Slab -279 $ 400.00 square feet, cai crete Less 25% $ 300.00 2. Partial Driveway - 374 square $ 375.00 feet, asphalt Less 5040 $ 187.50 S. Fencing a) _163 linear feet, 4' high S SMOG chain link plus 2 gates Less 40% S 525.00 b) .'—..0 linear feet of 6' $ 500.00 high chain link Less 4045 $ 160.00 03- 37318 - 34 Y• PART TAI-M VALUATION' Improvements (Continued) Severance Damages The highest and best use of the subject is residential. The part taken does not effecc a change in that use. Access and utility remain the same. The remaining value of the subject property is not, in our opinion, diminished by the part taken. Therefore, we do not consider there to be any severance damages to the subject property. Special Benefits The proposed street improvement provides no apparent added value to the subject property It is a benefit to the neighborhood as a whole and not specific to the subject Therefore, we do not feel there are any special benefits relative to the subject property. 0387.318 35 _ /�3 CostXew Contributory Item TYccrintinn Tpee Danr — ition Value S. Landscaping (12)15 gallon Yuccas S °00.00 (10) 5 gallon rose bushes 350.00 (1) large Beavertail Cactus 25.00 (1) 5 gallon Rally bush 25.00 (2) 1 gallon wax leaf shrubs 30.03 (1) 5 gallon wax leaf shrub 25.00 (3) 15 gallon trees 225.00 (1) 5 gallon Olive tree 25.00 (4) large succulents 100.00 3,200 square feet of grass S 800.M Replacement Cost New r S 1505.00 Total Value of Imp- ovements: $ 2'7,435.00 $ 27,500.00 (R) Total Land S 11,250.00 Improvements 27M0,04 Total S 38,750.00 Severance Damages The highest and best use of the subject is residential. The part taken does not effecc a change in that use. Access and utility remain the same. The remaining value of the subject property is not, in our opinion, diminished by the part taken. Therefore, we do not consider there to be any severance damages to the subject property. Special Benefits The proposed street improvement provides no apparent added value to the subject property It is a benefit to the neighborhood as a whole and not specific to the subject Therefore, we do not feel there are any special benefits relative to the subject property. 0387.318 35 _ /�3 PART MAIM VALUATIO; I 03.87 -318 36 16 � S+ Srim ax —y of Fstimated VaIues as of September 1, ISM Valuo of property in before condition: $ 100,000.00 ,. Les: +slue of the proposed taking: Value of remainder as part of the whole: S S 38,750.00 61,250.00 Value of remainder in the after condition: S 6150.00 {° Severance Damages: S 0.00 Special Benefits: S 0.00 Total Just Compensation Value of the Part Taken: $38,,50.00 0 Severance Damages: S 0.00 Special Benefits: S W10 Total: S 38;+50.00 03.87 -318 36 16 � LiTRODUCTION SUNDIARY OF SALMNT DATA, d Vesting* Albert D. and Eileen E. Wootten Location 9807 Arrow Route, approximately 665 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the south side of Arrow Route, Cucamonga, San Bernardino Co., Calif. 13 Assessor Parcel \o.: 209-0:1.17 s~' : Legal Description See Title Report in Addenda C r; Area of Ownership: .39 more or less aces (17,000 square feet) StreetAccess: Access is by paved road Topography. Level Y. Improvements 2 older homes on one lot with chain link and woad fencing r Zoning The property is zoned L - Low density residential, 2 - 4 dwelling units per hcre Present Use: Residential Highest& Best Use: Single family residential r Summary of Estimated Values as of September 1,19$;: Value of property in before condition: $ 100,000.00 Less value of the proposed taking S 38,750.00 Value of remainder as Value of remainder in part of the whole: $ 61,250.00 the after condition $ 61,250.00 Severance Damages: S 0.00 -- Special Benefits: S 0.00 Total Just Compensation: Value of the Part Taken: $ 38,750.00 Severance Damages: $ 0.00 Special Benefits: S 0.00 Total• S 331, 0.00 03- 67318 5 r iNIAMMT DATA APPROACH c P �:� . is located at 294 North 10th Al¢nd and approaamately 2e1/2 miles i Street and Washington Boulevard in UP v residences on one lot One west of to subjecL a Bungalow with rock P pillars, the other one being a is a t�•p f small wood sided home. The total living space is approximately the r, which is a 6,957-19 square feet, they are 50 • 60 Years old and in Average Condition. There " ert sold on January 26,1987.1987• far S92,000.00. appears W be two one car wood garages on the props square foot lot The prop S residential with a minimum .3 The zoning is R \1.2.0 which is multi•faniily lot sire of 2.000 square feetper dwelling After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property based on Sale Adjusents were made for size of subject, location and construction No. 3 is: $ 103,000.00 G 4 is located at 421 North 10th Avenue on they of Upland and was�ington Boulevard and lOt Street in the City : appro-dmately 2.1/2 miles west of the style residence with tilelmof and residences on one lot one being a SP 1 car garage and to other beia ace is 1.600 square feet they are 35 composition 55 shingle roof. The total living p sold on December 27 1966 for $76 700.00• The foot is R'm to yeas old and in fair condition. The lot size is 7,194.75 square feet let property whits is multifamily residential with a 7.600 square foot minim size. based on Sale No. 4 Adjustments were made for time, size of subject and location. After adjustments. the estimated value of the subject property is $ 961000.Oc Sales Summ2^ «'ith adjustments, the sales data indicate a range e value for the subject of 596.000.00 to $104.000.00. After considering the Pertinent data available to ge the neat¢ er cal estate. the final aestimate the value of to subject p our roperty neral based on the Market Data Appi ^ch is: 102,000.00 r 03. 87.318 24 / r` M. 03- 87.318 COSTAPPROACS SL; ZURY Land (17,000 Square Feet) S 37,500.00 Improvements g g3nnnnn TotalValue: S 100,500.00 t 29 �/t ° ( D / r �t i s� ALPME STREET Z - -�_ Y PROPERTY DESCPJPnoN SCIMIATIC 3'f 4 SCALE j{` Q C.enC�Le :.J sU.mwt 2 Ltgt1 V a> I. ResidenceNo.l --- 'k IIParldngSlab r ` 2. Residence No. 2 Mtch n ��0 ea�y 2b. Carport Asphalt Drive 3. Dining LMol HR Area Rues BR 1 3 setsuk .3 03- 87.318 ARROW ROUTE y V �• D COJrC,;PPROACH The InCOme ApPmach is based on the ownership. Fair rental income less Of arrive value. net income This net Taco typical expenses xpenses is de of prope tY , me is then ca is deterazned to PitaIized into an Indication A scuds was made in the general to the subject that are cur eat! , area of rented ject for similar far recent sales of 3 loaned ore sub Approach) t Properties similar to A search Properties mul "Plies fromtthe are p' being rented is the subject (see \IarLet Data However, % n I eL. tt,e did not find order t derive a an figures do have the rents from the gross rent minimum of the- assumption that subject prop ble to the sufije IO,b his investment, estar wouldpw ty I these on esemeat,aa inv Ii we have ascertained eat to receive a Gross Income (Annual) the following: ) J Kant Expenses (Annual) $ 10,500.00 Taxes Insurance $ r 350.00 Stater 250.00 Total Estimated Net Income $ 1,100.006 (Annual) $ Capitalization Bate a 10% 9,400.00 Estimated Value of the or: Subject - Estimated n Net Iacomo /Capitalization Rate — I0, ' $94,000.00 03-87 .318 30. 09 ,4. it VALUATION CORRELATION Estimated market value indicated by the: Market Data Approach $ 102,000.00 Cost Approac`. Land S 37500.00 Improvements S 63,000.00 S 100,500.00 Income Apprcach $ 94,000.00 While all three approaches to value were considered, the Cost and Market Approaches were given tht mast weight. This was due, in part, to the lack of data available for use in the Income Approach to value. The Cost Approach was considered more useful because the property to be acquired does not require a full take. The underlying land value and (1) single family residential unit will retain its utility after the part take. After s considering that the pertinent x :mat d valueaof the subject property is: opinion ONE HL.'DRED THOJSAXD DOLLARS ($ 100,000.00) 03.57315 31 t i PART TAKE PIiOTOGRAPH AND PLAT MAP rl� iiRROI✓ Ifourr //Vtr eiNe o� NCB GF N!✓'/r C/ ��✓iS� I! 8: 67--f i PJ 0 0 9 8 G S V N I J V 03.87.3] 8 82 .. .. aC'�a �•MI °.. I I A P,�RT TAIM VALUATION rt Summary o(Estimated Values'as of September 3,1957: Value of property in Defore cond-iticru $ 100.000.00 Less value of the ymposed taking- S 38,750.00 Value of remander'as part of thewl.r,*,e: S 61,250.00 Value of remainder in the after cundidon: S 6I.250.00 Severance Damages: S 0.00 Special Be- S 0.00 Total Just Compensation: fi Value of the ?art Taken: $3S,750.00 Severance Damages: S 0.00 Special Bent. 5 -fits: S 000 Total: $SS,750.00 I a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CAT': July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell 11. Maquire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of a partial release of the Improvement Security for Tract 12870 pertaining to the Victoria Basin and the E_.wanda Storm Drain, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, between Etiwanda and East Avenues, submitted by AAH Investments, A California General Partnership It i- n eamended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution rele, ing that portion of the Improvement security for Tract 12870 pertaining to the Etiwanda Storm Drain accepted at the April 6, 1988, Council meeting and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said resolution. Background /Analysis .he Developer, AAM Investments, A California General Partnership, submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of a portion of the Etiwanda Storm Drain and the Victoria Basin. The City Council has awarded a Contract for the construction of the Etiwanda Storm Drain, a capital improvement project. The Developer is requesting the release of that portion of the bond amount that applies to the storm drain as follows: ORIGINAL BOND Faithful Performance $822,000 Labor and Material 5411,000 ResDep s u mi tied, AUK, .sd Attachment 03 REDUCTION REMAINDER $602,000 5220,000- $301,000 $110,000 1 i nC _�•�., ice., ��' �' °� RESOLUTION N0. gg -/ YN3 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PARTIAL RELEASE OF THE IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 (VICTORIA BASIN AND ETIWANOA. STORM DRAIN) V'} WHEREAS, the developer, AAM Investments, A California General Partnership, of Tract 12870 submitted an agreement and security for construction of the Victoria Basin and the Etiwanda Storm Drain and the City Council accepted said agreement and security on April 6, 1988; and S'f WHEREAS, the City has awarded a contract for the construction of the Etivanda Storm Drain; and r, WHEREAS, said security guaranteeing the construction of the Etiwanda Storm Drain is no longer required by the City; and THEREFORE, the developer is requesting the release of the surety pertaining to the Etiwanda Storm Drain only, as follows: ORIGINAL BOND REDUCTION REMAINDER Faithful Performance $822,000 $602,000 $220,000 Labor and Material $411,000 $301,000 $110,000 t NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by iho City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said bond amounts are hereby reduced by the above- entioned amounts and the City Clerk is authorized to send a copy of Z this resolution to the surety company. Y' n Z e{ a fl rly+v C,�.,e •I..a p. t�t,'r Y Sa'; fi�'A` :.Msr,+ � " E =i w..Gr a;: -•� , ski �'. 2"`�y''. �•V.'�V:+'" ,`,+(•* ' CITY OF RANCHO CUQ61ONGA s STAFF REPORT t DATE: June 30, 1988 TO: City Council PROM: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager BY: Marti Biggins, Emergency Preparedness Coordinators, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been given the oppoirtunity to purchase radios for the Emergency Operations Center based on the San Bernardino County Bid Contract a88BP100KA with Motorola. I., believe using this method would be to our advantage. Council approval would allow,Rancho Cucamonga to purchase these radios at a cost approximately ao% under the price 'of Other vendors. Also, valuable time would be saved in addressing the city's vulnerability, by establishing this communication center at our E 0 C These radios are a budgeted and approved :tam in the Disaster Preparedness Budget. Therefore, it is recommended that the Council approve the purchase of the radio equipment for the Emergency Operations Center, not to exceed 86 4,000, under the San Bernardino County Bid SBBBP100KA with Motorola. Attachments /5S t -. ,•,A ,y M Y OCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMERGENCY OPBRATIORS CENTER RADIO SYSTEM PROPOSAL Ys. Marti Higgins Emergency Operations Coordinator 9330 Basel ino �� Ranch Cucamonga, CA 7 Doer Mortis Per your request, and based upon our several meatinge and conversations, both with you and with Captain Shore, the tollowing proposal is submitted. The prices herein are based uppon the Count9y of San Bernardino Bid y Contract RB5BFSOONAy. The pricing is to be Lreatod as PROPRIETARY and a secure divulged only to Board and Cammitteo members as required to i The s of meat necessary to provide four (44q) Fire frequencies, four <d) Sheriff /Law frequencies one (1) CitYRfre u Ccntiand o e (1)BCCVD fro gqvency consists of tha Motorola ME StaEiani. One of these has a matering chasis for maintenance and a troubleshooting. The same chaois may be moved to the other three bases, oo it was not doomed necessary to tpurchaso one for these. Each of the Base Stations is to bo equipped wi(.h m Batteryv Charger and Emergency reverting ppaver with alarm. The City will Zurnis the batterie §, per our discussion. The Motorola T -1600 Remote Control Consoles (four) are to be supplied, as well as additional headset Jacks at Lhe OPS Boopard for the Your base wlthicocbinationa locking /nondlockin3 puohrtattnl %r switch- style Tho equipment required to provide full sixteen (10) channel eommuaications for the other six agencies involved consists of thowith Motorola MaxTrac Mobile, 45 Vatt, aKorator selectable Bonn radio, k microthane and mounting tray. This will allow them to be used in intermittent duty n plicatione and aormit contact with numerous agencies in and arround the City. Pricing includdpes seven (7) of these ppunito although only six (6) are required. This fang redundarndino. the complete Operrtions Center a case of the of It is further understood that Sinclair Products will furnish all Antennae Antenna Mounts, and RF Feedline required on a separate quote The City is to install the Antenna Haunts per our location specs CO)LSERCO, the Motorola Service :ihaP Sacableee. linessiandiantennas at optimize all radios, remote coat -olo, 9153 Ninth St., ppRancho Cucamonga. y and 7iooskrtoywacartcCiwork1ng w thryouitty eapthaoioelolnn6ibntTj ourte, ]oint eYSorte resulting n a rulYY of iicioat Hmarge¢cy pore one Center The cost of providing, installing and optimizing this system ise EQUIPMENT -- ---$35,196 30 6NS, /OFPTT TAX __ -S 6,250 00 SYSTEM TOTAL 5437F53-U6 An Actual Eyuipment breakdown, and all equipment specifications are sessiondtoiexplainatheaequ ipmentoaam requirements. Please foalafreerto call me /1 Spa er)ely, /('7(' 17; /J��/'�CZCJ ordon L. Ay s Account Exacetive Government Markets Division 5700 Division STH 105 G R(714)s781. 7600 92906 rY O r MOTOROLA EQUIPMENT LIST QTY MODEL DESCRIPTION UNIT 3 EXT 3 1 C73KSBIIQO MSR2000 CONTINUOUS DUTY HASH STATION $5823.05 $5823.05 50-100 WATT, T4 —R4 VITH3 Q C -149 INTRRCOH/METHR NO C -28 EMERGENCY REVERTING CHARGER V /ALARM 1 C73XSB3196 XSR2000 CONTINUOUS DUTY HASH STATION $5720.00 35720.00 50 -100 WATT PL TONE TR —R4 VITHe L -28 EMBRF.ENCY RHORTING CHARGER V /ALARM C -276 TX PL DIFFERENT THAN RX PL 2 C73KSB3196 XSR2000 CONTINUOUS DUTY HASH STATION $4784.50 39569.00 00 -100 WATT PL TONE TR —R4 VITHs C -28 EMERGENCY REVfiRTIRO CHARGER V /ALARM C -276 TX PL DIFFERBNT THAN RX PL C -503 OMIT THREE TRANSMIT XTALS C -523 OMIT THREE RECEIVE XTALS 7 D43MJADA5 —K MAXTRAC 300 MOBILE 16 FREQUENCY SELECTABLE SCAT. 3 985.15 $6896.05 45 WATT, OPERATOR H -665 CONTROL STATION OPERATION. 117VAC /60 RZ POWER SUPPLY. DESK MICROPHONE BASE TRAY. ADAPTER B- 705OMITMANTENNA 2 T1505 —Y. REMOTE CONTROL CONSOLE VITHt $1734.25 33468.50 L -66 4 PRH%RNCY OPERATION L -59 LOTL (FCC REOUIRSKENT) L -49 SPEAKER MUTH <H.S. OPERATION) 2 T1805 —M CONSOLE V&9T) 31309.85 32629.70 yEMg9ELCCONTROL L -49 SPEAKER MUTE (H.S. OPERATION) 4 STARSET SUPRA HEADSET TO OPERATE 3 275.00 31100.00 BASH STATIONS 1 COMSERCO INSTALLATION —TO INCLVDHi �...... �.�n� •n�nnn� vnnsre PZ ��— •iv •1 a —. CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1988 MOUC TO: City council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - ppea o ann ng ama ss on c s on requiring (1) in -lieu fees for utility undergrounding and 20 off-site complex ni1.08racre ofelapnd inothe Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per Main,, locatedAamt.t2 7termi2uses of Sierra Madre Avenue and RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be set for a public hearing on the August 3, 1988 City Council aCenda. BAG4GROL'ND /ANALYSIS Development Review 88 -03 was approved by the planning Commission on June 22, 1988. This action has been appealed to the City Council, and as such requires that a public hearing be set. To allow for hearing should be scheduledm for inthe f regular City hCo nciln9meeti l ng Of August 3, 1988. ARespectf y u ted, Attachment j =� r S• d . d t� !v J :5 r- e e i e C P AE_SJdldel _ T �•O M P A N Y June 23, 1988 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline Road, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Attention: Planning Department RE: ENVIRONMEIMAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - SMITH - -he development of a 20 unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue ana Main Street - APN: 207 - 251 -22. To Whom It May Concern: This letter is an appeal for the above referenced project from the Planning Commission meeting of Juna 22, 1988. The items for appeal are as follows: En�ineerinR Division (1) The developer shall obtain the necessary right -of- way and construct full width improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site northerly to the existing portion of Sierra Madre Avenue prior to issuance of building permits. The developer is eligible for reimbursement for the cost of construction of the off -site improvements upon development cr redevelopmeat fo the adjacent property. The amount of the reimbursement will be prorated on a net acreage basis (minus street dedication) for the benefited properties. RECEIVED JUN 24 1988 cur OF RAN01b' dt * (1) CNCIN(CRI,YO DIY1:10N ARCHaCkSK PLAM"G a DEAGNWG la97 ASK +i4O4'.[. SJR AI Y. RANDOCLCAMOW �C"11p y.'^p1f,Cly.1211 � :ti'r ..,'.L. .-_ O . -M ._P. A .N (2) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future S urdergrounding of the existin overhead utilities (railroad communication lines) within the A.T. & ^Y S.F. Railroad easement chall be pail to the City prior to t%e issuance of building permits. The fee shall be half the City adopted unit amount times the 'length of the project'aite. ; (3) Sidewalk shall be constructed for the entire length of Sierra Madre Avenue. The east aide shall be 6 feet curb adjacent The west side shall be 6k feet in width to coves the entire parkway area extending from the existing wall to the curb. We appreciate your time and cooperation as we look forward to meeting with the City Council at the earliest possible time. Sincerely. A. E. S.II= CCOOMP�ANY.�,{. Alan E. Smith (2) f QC) =' ARCHaECUM RANNWG a DES*NWG i� 6OnARCHI&DA'4.3012Ct MMbGQRJAWfiAGOt1.1D (7uJA1FiN1 i. �. pisi p _ "M�i Nt�� • � — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAblONGA : 5 STAFF REPORT Date: July 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: an Environme of a ntal tal A Public ssment iReviewDate for the spropo ed 19th . Street Improvements from West City Limits to Jasper Street RECOMMDATIDR• It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution for the setting of a Public Hearing on the City Council's next meeting date of Wednesday, August 3, 1988, for the 19th, Street Environmental Assessment Review and that it direct the city Clerk to submit an Environmental Assessment i for advertisement Daily ThursdayyJuly, 21, 1988 fora onetimepublicatioon Sunday, 1988, ten calendar days prior to said public hearing date pursuant to the California Environmental quality Act (CEQA) requirement,. BACKBRDUID /AKALYSIS• This report presents the Engineering Staff's request to set a Public Hearing date for the above subject Environmental Assessment Review. Said Assessment Review is in conformance with CEQA requirements and shall render an environmental evaluation of the City's proposed 19th Street Improvements. Respec 9 tted, RHM: Attachment ai t RESOLUTION N0. St' 7 3 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,'APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1988 FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the City's Engineering Staff and Associated Engineers to proceed with formal designs for the- Improvement of 19th Street from West City Limits to Jasper Street; and WHEREAS, said proposed improvement requires an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESCLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves sets a public hearing date of Wednesday. August 3, 1988 at 7:30 D.m. to be held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho C:-.amonga, California for the Etiwanda Storm Drain Environmental Assessment Review; and Section 2: The City Clerk is directed to submit the attached City of Rancho ucamonga Environmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to the Daily Report by Thursday, July 21, 1988 for a one -time publication on Sunday, July 24, 1988, ten calendar days prior to said public hearing date pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. -� i. 4 i s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE o`n: e ii Complete environmental assessments have been prepared for the following prolects(s). The City Council will be considering these assessments, staff's < recommendation, and public input, -at their meeting of August 3, 1988 prior to making a final environmental determination. Following is a brief description and location of the project(s) and staff's as r recmendation on the project(s) to be considered. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The project which baglns near the westerly limit of the City and continues easterly to Jasper Street consists in general of widening the street to four (4) lanes, installation of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lights and minor restoration of landscape affected. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the Environmental Assessment and t+- Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed 19th Street Improvements. A copy of the Environme:ital Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho ' Cucamonga Engineering Division Office located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite •B•, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Written co mtnts should be addressed to the Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, or phoned at (714) 939 -1862. In addition concerns can be addressed to the City Council publicly-,t the meeting time previously mentdoned. The meeting will begin at 7 :30 p.m. and shall take Place at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. s :' PUBLISH: �r Y. I — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAItIONGA r STAFF REPORT ' Date: July 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the setting cf a Public Hearing Date of August 3, 1988 for the 19th Street (Hermosa to Cartilla) Environmental Assessment Review RECtOMORTIOM: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution for the setting of a Public Hearing on the City Council's next meeting date of Wednesday, August 3, 1188, for the 19th Street Environmental Assessment Review and that it direct the City Clerk to submit an Environmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to the Daily Rcport by Thursday, July 21, 1988 for a one-time publication on Sunday. July 24, 1988, ten calendar days prior to said public hearing date pursuant to the California Environmental quality Act (CEQA) requirements. BACKGROUND /AMALTSIS' This report presents the Engineering Staff's request to set a Public Hearing date for the above subject Environmental Assessment Review. Said Assessment Review is ir. conformance with CEQA requirements and shall render an environmental evaluation of the City's proposed 19th Street Improvement. Respe u ubmi ted, RHM: Attachment q 9 RESOLUTION N0. 98 -113`f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY:OF y RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING AND SETTIRG A PUBLIC HEAAING DOTE OF- WEMESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1988 FOR THE PROPOSED-19TH STREET ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEM WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the City,s Engineering Staff and Associated Engineers to proceed with formal designs for the Improvement of 19th Street from Hermosa Avenue to CartillA Avenue; and WHEREAS, said proposed improvement requires an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the California EnvirN-4ntal Quality Act, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section l: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves an se s a public hearing date of Wednesday, August 3, 1988 at ?:30 p.m, to be held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California for the Etiwanda Storm Drain Environmental Assessment Review; and Section 2: The City Clerk is directed to submit the attached City of Rancho � u ga Environmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to the Daily Report by Thursday, July 21, 1988 for a one -time publication on Sunday, July 24, 1988, ten calendar days prior to said public hearing date pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Art (CEQA) requirements. all CITY OF RANCHO QJCAMGA E"VIRONiFATAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE Complete environmental asses'"ents have been Prepared for the following proj2c 's). The City Council will be considering thest: assessments. staff's on, 4 recommendati nd public input, at theirineeting of August 3. 1988 prior to making a final environmental deterainaticn. Following Is a brief description and location of the project(s) and staff's recommendation an the project(s) to be Considered. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE OULARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET IMPROVEMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- the proposed project begins at Hermosa Avenue and continues easterly to Cartilla Avenue. It consists of widening the existing street section to its ultimate right-of-way (4 1 anes), installation of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lights and minor restoration of landscape affected. STAFF RECOMMENDATION- • It is eSnttrael d ssimepssromvenemt issuancre e com ma E nNegative t COeclarationlforptlu :aproposedil9th m eAt eas from Hermosa Avenue to Cartilla Avenue. A copy of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division office located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite 0 80, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Written comments should be addressed to t a he Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, or phoned at (714) 989-1852. In addition, concerns can be addressed to the City Council publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned. The meeting will begin at 7:30 and p.m. shall take place at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. PUBLISH: it ra- I' g a STAFF REPORT V� DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 13318, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita Drive, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation No. 31 and setting the date of public hearing for August 3. 1988 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 31 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 13318, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita Drive, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as AnnexWon 31 and setting the public hearing date for August 3, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subject annexation Is on file in the Engineering Division. Respect submitted, RHM: :s Attachments �-7 ,t,,. RESOLUTION No. 4�g U . qqU A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHDNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 Cucamonga directed theuCity.Enginneerht CmakeCouncil file with the City Rancho Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and s said City NaEreportthe writing9asecalled forepursuant towsaidtAct, whichereport has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor a:iy part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That Eineer's expenses or —lair work and ofethe Incldentalte expenses ineconnectionctherewith. contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc—r—fFeRr7n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report 1s hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. Report forEMe— purposes aofs report all subsequentlproc edings,handipursuanteto'the proposed district. } CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District do. .. Annexation No. 31 for Tract No. 13318 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 1S of thr, Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has e'ected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: T e furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light Improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTIO.4 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City._ Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the sane extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. i f, SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No casts will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These casts are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is comprised of street light improvements on local streets for - residential improvements' throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment uiit for the Operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional protects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the sane` benefit as two assessment- units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No 31 Total 5BOOL 1,432 7 1,439 9500L 4 0 4 *Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamp Size Total Lamps Rate NO'S Total Annual Maint. Cost SBOOL 1,439 X S 8.93 X 12 $154,203.24 9500L 4 X $10.16 X 12 487.68 Total Annual Maint. Cost $154,690.92 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 5,194 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 16 Total Assessment Units 5.210 _ /3a Y 1 PE 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Amval Maintenance Cost - $154 690.92 529.69 /year /unit Io.-6T n s n s r c cI0— v: Assessment shti11 apply to each lot or parcel as explained to Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram , Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this u report and labeled `Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 20, Annexation No. 31. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the }, text of this report. 0 SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When unit. are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. i SECTION 7. Orde.T of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers ail testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every y?ar in May, the City Engineer Rtes a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and ,PProves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. a� ?I EXHIBIT "A" {�+ Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 31 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: - Assess. No, of Lam s to h�e Annexed Project Acreage �— 3MM- 9'S00Lz6 ODD�2T00D[ I '.i TR 13318 - -- 16 7 - -- ___ _ -- -_- 1 t: i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2- ANNEXATION NO. 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF BAN BBRNARDINO BTATR OF CAL17ORNIA - �,iT C, ,3 1`\ ,m I 4. i s RESOLUTION NO. % -W/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, A.N ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATiNG SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N3. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OWCTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and convenience regTe an 1TIFF'5- a Eion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation i includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wTEhTroadway rigFt--o-f -way enrnerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file to the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 31 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 20. SECTION 3. Descri tion of Assessment District: That the contempla ei�cT in t e op n on o sa y council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district 1s described as follows: All tot =wt a,n territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain `Map of Annexation No. 31 to 'treet Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Re ort of En sneer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * as approve t e repor of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 20 is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and For the extent of the work. v+_. s •• viA RESOLUTION N0. ' f PAGE 2 r. SECTION S. Collection o` Assessments: The assessment shall be collected of f� samo t ak an n e scree manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City 9;.. Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon . said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determ,ned. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearincs Notice is hereby given that Ss on August�,i9H$; at t a our o pm in -the City Council Chambers at 9161 "= Base Line, in the City uf-Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any abjactiens to the work or extent of the assessment district, mqy appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said c district snould not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the ' property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clark of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be y. considered. If thi signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests. then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. d SECTION 7. Landscapinq and Liqhting Act of 1972: All the work -Hall -. herein Propose3 be done am carried-tnrough in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and L Lighting Act of 1972, being Oivlslon 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. k SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention. Published notice 5 shall be made pursuant to Section o t e verrmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and ,' the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date ' set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar a, a rornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, .:.ai a 't CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Paguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide =Z 4M SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract 13318, Parcel Map 10941, CUP 87 -19, CUP 87 -42, DR 86 -08, OR 87 -41 and OR 87 -52 (various Maintenance District No. lIas Annexation Not L 47 and setting the date of public hearing for August 3, 1988 RECMMD1TIDx: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 47 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. Background /Analysis Attached for rity Council approval 1s a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract 13318, Parcel Map 10941, CUP 87 -19, CUP 87 -42 OR 86 -08, OR 87 -41 and DR 87 -52 (various locations throughout the CityS to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation 47 and setting the public hearing date for August 3, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respectfu submitted, JH: Attachment RESOLUTION NO. $ g - LN3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 47 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on July 6, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said Cit a report in writing as requtr-d by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and n WHEREAS said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part titereaf, and finds that each and every part of said report is ?' sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 3� Rancho Cucamonga as follows: kSECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily 1 approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and describedin said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Mssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for LF purposes of all suD,equent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. .. rj� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 47 for TR 13318, PM 10941, CUP 87 -19, CUP 87 -42, DR 87 -08, DR 87 -41 and DR 87 -52 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light Improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas In the District and cist snall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in thg conditions of approval for the development and as apF•oved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract-map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual developmeit is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activ4ties on the street lighting district Include: the repair, remoial or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 137 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements Kill be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it 1s estimated that maintenance costs for assessaent purposes will be as i•dica:ed below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zaces. Zon't 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single fsmily. multi- family, condomini:mms and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling enit in this zoae wil` be assessed as one asses -,.cnt unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 1. shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and fnerav Cost: *High Pressure Sodium icpor Total No, of Lamps Lrp Size Lams Lamps Imnex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 47 Total 5800L 460 1 461 9500L 529 6 535 16,00OL 16 0 16 2-9,0001. 4 0 4 27,SOOL 7 0 7 *High Pressure Sodium icpor 2. Total Assessment Antis: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 17,160 Assessment Units this annex per tsge 4 • 207_ Total Assessment Units 17,367 .W 4� Total Total Annual Lrp Size Lams Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800L 461 X S 8.93 X 12 S 49,400.76 9500L 535 X 510.16 X 12 65,227.20 16,0001. 16 X $12.08 X '2 2,319.36 22,000L 4 X $13.84 X 12 664.32 27,500 7 X $15.31 X 12 • 3,123.24 Total Annual Haint. Cost • $120,734.e8 2. Total Assessment Antis: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 17,160 Assessment Units this annex per tsge 4 • 207_ Total Assessment Units 17,367 .W 4� 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - $120 73 1 . 56.95 /year /unit - No. o n s n s r.c , Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1•, Annexation No. 47. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the r` text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment :c Improvenents for the District are found to be of general benzflt to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each j unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution or Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year to June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 8 i 139 ri EXHIBIT 'A' Properties and improvements to be Included within'Annexation Ho. 47 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1; Assess. Ro. of L s to be Annexed Pra ect Acreage �oii TR13318 - -- 16 1 - -- - -- - -- - -- t� Zone 2 — :<. Y CUP 87 -19 3,87 7.74 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- CUP 87 -42 2.27 4.54 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- �,`,�, OR 86 -08 1.00 2.00 --- _ -_ - -- _ -- _ -_ DR 87 -41 1.28 2.56 - -- - -- - -- ___ ___ . OR 87 -52 88.00 176.0^ - -- 6 - -- - -- - -- ° PM 10941 pCi 1 1.62 3.24 - -- - -- _ -- - -- - -- „ pcl 2 1.85 3.70 - -- - -- -.- - -- - -- pcl 3 3.82 7.64 TOTAL 103.71 207.42 1 6 - -- - -- -_- I Vo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SM BZRNARDINO ` : STATB Of CALIFORNIA T y y� ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 47 14,1p , 1 5 h •tea 1 . ^ r'j 1. 11 Il Il 11 11 11 I) is • � r 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SM BZRNARDINO ` : STATB Of CALIFORNIA T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DICTRICT NO.1 I ANNEXATION NO. 47 s f Y 1] t Y CITY OF RANCHO CU CAXONOA Q��Qg41 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA - T im 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION W 47 �:id CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA � T C (1 y R7-l4 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 47 5, CIXY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A cj' p " • � COUNTY OF SAN BEBNARDINO STATE OF CALVORMA T V. �l i _ - •�._.- _ ,_ -.may �__ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 47 �mm win _ , �■� III " CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN DRBNARDDIO STATE OF CALIFORNIA N Y m ��i !- J 11 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 47 as I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONIGA DFLF��-'tl COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDDIO ..__, �; G STATE OF CAU 1v ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXAmoN No. 47 i lY 17E I Al _ Hill C q 6 I < ' I• i �' W I a r qsb • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF BAN RIMNARDINO pR 87-z!U ..,_� _. STATE OF CALIFORNIA T 1V RESOLUTION NO. 49 � ' VP 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 47 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrl tlon of Work: That the public Interest and convenience regTe an s e n en ion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost Ind supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w *iF�dway r g t -o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 47 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10. SECTION 3. Descri lion ..7 Assessment District: That the contemplateowor, ,, in t e op n ono sa ty Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 47 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1' maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of En sneer: The City Council of said City by Resolution Ro. * Fas approv�eport of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. /N b RESOLUTION NO. - PAGE 2 SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at'iaae ae an n same manner as County taxes are' collected. The City Engineer'shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing Notice is hereby'g on August- 3Z.j8; a tven that City at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the`assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed to accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and he other protests or objections will be - ti considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION :. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: Ail the work e herein propose s ali be done an carr a through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Wig Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. £S SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pu�suan o ec on a overnmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and �s the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the d -te set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, C Tiro—rnta, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. o.. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT July 6. 1988 (f City Council and City Manager dN8 Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide Approval to Annex PM 10941, DR 86 -08, OR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /Commercial) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation Ho. 18 and setting the date of public hearing for August 3, 1988 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 18 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. Background /Analysis Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex PM 10941, OR 86 -08, DR 87 -52 and CLIP 87 -19 (Industrial /Commerclal) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation 18 and setting the public hearing date for August 3, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving annexation approval etters from h the EndevelopersRerequesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respecig rim submitted, eJA' Attachment i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT July 6. 1988 (f City Council and City Manager dN8 Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide Approval to Annex PM 10941, DR 86 -08, OR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /Commercial) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation Ho. 18 and setting the date of public hearing for August 3, 1988 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 18 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. Background /Analysis Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex PM 10941, OR 86 -08, DR 87 -52 and CLIP 87 -19 (Industrial /Commerclal) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation 18 and setting the public hearing date for August 3, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving annexation approval etters from h the EndevelopersRerequesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respecig rim submitted, eJA' Attachment i RESOLUTION NO. $ 8 Uy� -- ,9' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY , ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET ° LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, on July 6, 1908, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 197); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report to writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, +aid City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report it sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therWth, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and describedTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in std sn sessment District in proportion to the estimated berefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby ` preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for —t9'1— purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 4— CITY OF RANCHO CUfAMONGA In Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. Annexation No. 18 for PM 10941, DR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 SECTION 1. Authority for Report liance with the d This 1,eDivisioni15cofpthe Streets d Highway�seCode, Statecof 4, California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. a SECTION 2. General Description r This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the ilstrict are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light District A1tass local withn9the the CityhEnglreer. all areasninmthet considered of benassessedeontatper unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for th, development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual developoent is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement, providing 'or the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. all improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 is comprised of street light improvements On local streets for all industrial, commercial and Institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 1s shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 18 Total 5800L 47 11 58 9500L 5 0 5 *High Pressure Sodium vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate MWS Maint. Cost 5800L 58 X 3 8.93 X 12 • $6,215.28 9500L 5 X $10.16 X 12 609.60 Total Annual Maint. Cost $6,824.88 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 460 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 198 Total Assessment Units 658 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost S6,824 ' 88 510.37 /year /unit Na. o n ti in strict Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as exptain:d to Section 6. .,:vv -X •• ': 3'. "� �.Yo .�..��{",Y� \-Yi:.'3'l J=` .... � ,-Y= •" -Y: _ :t�..r•. viii �:� .14:7�� 1. eyy •'� -A SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and laboled 'Street 11 Lighting Maintenance District No. 64 ' Annexation No. 18. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6, Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each " ?. unit, When units are based on acreage, assessment will be Z units per ';; net acre. V SECTION 1. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Ever) year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and app eves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. er EXHIBIT 'A• Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Assess. No. of Lams to be Annexed Pro ect Acreage —p�ii— 1 L �_,_ PH 10941 7.29 14.58 3 -.- . -- i; OR 87 -52 88.00 176.00 --. -.- --- --- --- CUP 87 -19 3_87 7.74 8 99.16 198.32 11 _ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO. 18 W < w 9 < T W = 2 < pA Si.. W Z a u k CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �: as COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO j' STkYB OF CALIFORNIA N y= '� If" I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM = STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION NO. 18 �91MJr1f i47 0 A IL 1 / •// f/ Auo,O I aw n IIr- r Ae r 9 I 11 I � �,V CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � DR6��_ I . _ COUNT'I OF am MNARDD!10 WATE OF CAI.MRN[A :+x T, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. & ANNEXATION NO. IS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVONOA t, COUNTY OF SAN BERNAXIDIN0 A ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA �T y im i O F; W f P RESOLUTION NO. Q b - qi%'s ? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTIOI TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTERANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ' AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE ,t FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Coce of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrl ,ion of Mork: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e n en on of this City Council to form a maintenance district to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation Includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w N'ithTn roadwey r�fif of-Nay enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 60. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District; That the contemplated d work, in the opinion of said y aunt , is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain °Map of Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6° maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. T-Fas approved the report of the engineer of work which report Indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled `Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 60 is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. i59 RESOLHTIOH H0. PAGE 2 SECTION 5.- Coilectlon of Assessments; The s ;etsment shall be collected af- fFeiame me an n e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file`a report annually with th? City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. li SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin : Notice is hereby given that on August�HB; at-M— Four o e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City'of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work'should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed In accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered.to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bern ardiio County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the miner of the property so'descrlbed. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein Proposed s all a one an carr a roug n pursuance of an act of the Legislature of the State of California designrted the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan o ec on a overrmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days berore the date set for the hearing, at least once in The De-Dail, Re rt, a newspaper of general circulatrrvF published 1n the City of On ar o, a ornia, nd circulated In the City cat Rancho Cucamonga, California. I c 5 ,�� .0 -189• � - (1 v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Juuy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex PM 10941, OR 86 -08, Or 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /Coar,ercial) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 22 and setting the date of public hearing for August 3. 1938 RECOMMENDATION It is recomoended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 22 and setting the date eP public heartng regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex PM 10941, OR 86 -08, OR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /ComaerctalI to landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 22 and setting the public hearing Jate for August 3, 1988. Also attacked for Council consideration is a resolution giving praliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. �i Attachments /G/ �V4 ' a'. 1 4•i4� RESOLUTION NO. B'8' 111f- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 22 TO LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, en.10%, 0, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed t::: engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in wr.ting as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORc BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of tha itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses to connection therewith, contain -d to said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECT104 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and des-FM 3 n said report, the bouJaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECT1On 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land to safd-Kssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby -- preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for iFe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. ' I� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 V. Annexation No. 22 for y PM 10941, OR 86 -08, OR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report 1s in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way ur easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped iaproveaent on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if slid plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed. - work standards, it % estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) c_nts per square foot pen year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District ilo. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Lone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district wa, formed in October 5, 1983, fur the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated In the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. _ %3 h Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this Distric. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven 4 Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some parkway_ within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 22 is as follows. Zone I Existing District Total estimated maintenance cost $2,070 Assessment units 8 4 Total cost - assessment unit for year and month S2,070 5258.75 /year or 521.56 /mw. /lot Zone 2 Existing Annexation New District No. 22 Total Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,643 100 380,743 Total cost f assessment unit for year and month 0 x 5.30 • S 0 /yea• 0 /,Tc. /acre Assessment shall apply to ea,h lot as enumerated in Section F and the - attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Di. agree A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attach:d to this report and labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. S ' C= SECTION 6. Assessment Improvenents for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel `+ for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each let or parcel in Zone 2. '-' 1; The City actual assessments ibased lupon dthe pactual hcosts 9incurred by thetCitynduring the ) previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Laudscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's J Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to Oist•ict and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Fngineer files a report with the City Council.' S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r .j 3+, 7,7-rj7� T1- Properties and inpro, 1 emenis to be included within Anne. No. 22 (Zone 2) to Landscape 141 ntenance District No. 3: till PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE WOM pet 1 1.85 pcl 2 3.82 p),l 3 7.29 DR 86-08 1.0 DR 87-52 68.0 (pel 1. PH 6658) CUP 87-19 3.87 100-16 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANIHEXATION NO. I Area Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 hilliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 r yr i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.9 ANNEXATION NO. AA CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA ;j ENGINEERING DIVISION a 50 �> VICINITY MAP I N-It rm 0 c, 0 f � I 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. ,2,;L .w sr tw 19 o r I S1Tr A lr CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,NIONGA °jam jZ ENGINEERING DIVISION nn ' VICINITY MAP A lr t s v ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. ate. ITO' b a Ti i ry I I = i 11 If1 --rNI 4 NORTH L C', tin, CITY OF RANCHO CUC0 V1ONGA ^ ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP n 0 W r i >1 a 1� a ASSESSMENT _ DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION N0. Aa v��,^ ` i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONOA COUNTY OF &%N BERNARDINO STATE 07 CAL17ORNIA T 1� �PF57 -f4 ` ry 0. x RESOLUTION NO. S 0 , Y Yq A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THL ANNEXATION i0 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING O&iECTIONs THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisicns a the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highway_ Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of M convenience requ re ands iSre'Tnfe maintenance district in the City of Ran operation of those parkways and fact greenbelt purposes by deed or recorde boundaries of the proposed maintenant hereof. Said maintenance and operation any sprinkler system, trees, grass, lighting, structures, and walls in tonne, That the public interest and 1 of this City Council to form a Cucamonga for the maintenance and as thereon dedicated for common ubdi rsion tract map within the istrict described in Section 2 ludes the cost and supervision of intings, landscaping, ornamental r with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located TcFiio —road►ay igFf cf_"way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled `Annexation No. 22 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3•. SECTION 3. Descri lion of Assessment District: That the contempla a war , n the op n on nc s o o se, y ou more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district 1s assessed— _ to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary IInes shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 22 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3• heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *' indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. l -2a a F� SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Res014tIono.7_F&s approved report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 22, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3• is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the sosessments and for the extent of the work. 1 SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: t.., assessment shall be s collected—aE--UW-saw me an n same manne- as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City i Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin : Notice is hereby given that i on AugustT19B6-at Me our o n che City Council Chambers at 9161 r. Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessw_nt district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the _ property in which each signer Phereof is interested, sufficient to identify r the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to thn time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be r+ considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized Y assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property des- ibed in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propose�sFall a ne u cam a in punlaance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be —m-He p—ursua-nt-to—i-e-ctTo-n-Tri6rot the Goverment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the data - set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n r o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. r -7� CITY OF RANCHO CUCANtONOA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1988 �� TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 13318, located on the southeast corner of 6ermosa Avenue and Manzanita Drive, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation ND. 49 and setting the date of public hearing for August 3, 1988 LIiTi�I-- 10-- It is recoaaeanded that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 49 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Landscape Maintenance District Mo. 1. Analysis /Back rg ound Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 13318, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Vlanzanits Drive to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation No. 49 -and setting the public hearing date for August 3, 1988 Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subject annexation is on file in the Engineering Division. RespectJAW, b fitted, : I Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 'ES -qV e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 49 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I WHEREAS, on July 6, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said At. which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly con.$idered said report and each r and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, ontained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily pproved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and des—c-rIE-eTTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saTd-I esment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fa-f a —purposes of all subsequent procelydings, and pursuant to the proposed district. /73 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 49 for Tracts 13318 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General DescriDtien This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 13318 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shmm on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Raicho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated In the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. Tim plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specificaticns were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will - be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation wo. 49 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No. 49 Total Landscape Area 123,064.60 7,400 130,464.60 No. of 0. U. 9,921 16 9,937 _ l�1 S a Per Lot Annual Assessment 130,464,60 x S .30 $391,393.80 63 x $5.00 MM70M $3B -9,937 $39.41 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 acid the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation Involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated fnr inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A °, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in nay, the City Engineer files ° - ^_port with the City Council. 5 Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. N Properties and improvements to be Included within Annexation No. 49 to Landscape ,. Maintenance District No. 1: MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U 3TRM TUR GROLIND COVER TREES _ g_Tf- 13318 16 Hermosa Avenue (to 7,400 12 Manzanita to Rasberry) Manzanita Drive 20 Kernwood Court 31 —7 d60 SS 7 / -7k ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 4.9 I ♦ i a e f � � ` f f 't •� d . fs L- r9 f. • t�lf. • ff ,f f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G ENGINEERING DIVISION j VICINITY NIAP nn A N ri F it , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G ENGINEERING DIVISION j VICINITY NIAP nn A N ri F RESOLUTION NO. q g,qq A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAL;FORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 49 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1912 RID OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cccamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 1S of the Streets and Highways Code of the St:ce of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenfence require and Tt is thin%nflon of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliitet thereon dedicated for common green`elt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of eny sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls 1n connection with sa+: p; ^kways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located JUMn midway r gy -o -way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation No. 49 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1'. SECTION 3. Descrt Lion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wo , in—We—opinion o said unc , Is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certat Cucamonga fnclu lines shown uoa IInes'the extent ofIthe t the proposed assessment d file in the office of the 173 the City of Rancho exterior boundary 'Nap of Annexation No. strict No. 1' y Council of said City 9 by said boundary cry included within ct and which map is on Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of safd City by Resolutionlas approved the report of the engineer of work which report Indicates the awunt of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engfneer's Report, Annexation No. 49, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" 1s on file 1n the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessma.its and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of •isessmnts: The assessment shall be collected at the saaein i—saw runner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shah file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council wilt annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on August T rO athour of 7:Jo pa in the Cfty Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all parson: having ark), objections to the wort or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried ou . or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writingtt and must contain a description of t4 property in which each s1yg..er thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered'to the City Clerk of said City prior to the _ time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest 1s not shorn upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner 'of the property described in the protests, then such Protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Lands' in and L1 httn Act of 1972: All the work herein propose sal a one an Carr a roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be aareursuant to section Mtl of the Government Code. The Meyor s1,411 sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk suall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date' - set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report. a newspaper of- general circulation published in the City of OnTar of California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 6 ■r I DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCADIONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer An amendment to the Vesting Tentative Nap section of the City Subdivision Ordinance to include the regulation of non - residential subdivisions RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoaw-nds hat this item be set for a public hearing for first reading on the August 3, 1988 City Council agenda. BACKGROUND The City adopted its vesting tentative map ordinance for residential subdivisions on November 20, 1985, to be in effect by January 1, 1986, as required by State law. State law now requires that Developers be allowed to file a vesting tentative map for non - residential subdivisions. Therefore, staff has prepared an ordinanre which will amend the existing ordinance to govern the processing of non - residential in addition to residential subdivisions. Resp ul y Omitted, :dlw r a�, l Y I i (KID I MARC E ND.�C J / NG DEVM.OPNENL DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88- 01,CRF.gUEST 4G,XCHANGENIN THE OISTRICr DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDETTTIAL -TD Low- NEDILM RESIDENTIAL LOCATED NORTH OF HIGH M AVENUE, SOU1H OF LEMON AVENUE EXTENSION, AND NEST of DEER CREEK CHANNEL.; RRNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA; APR: PORTIONS OF 201- 271 -34 AND 41 (SEE EXHIBIT °A'), AND 201 - 27142 gg of Rancho Cucamonga held a5duly8advertised pub licc hearing npur0antCto Section 65854 of the California Government Cod and recorreended to tha,,= City Council adoption of a change in the district designatiol from Medlin Residential to Lw- Medium Residential. WHEREAS, On June 15, 1988, the City Council hold a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 6.5864 of the California Government Code. findings: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Council has made the following I. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terns of recess, size, and compatibility with existing land use In the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed District change would not have significant impacts on the enviro:ment nor the surrjunding properties; and 3. That the proposed amendment is in conformance wI0 the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and a i 1988. Pproves ssuance of A Negative Declaration on June 15, - 9OW, THEREFORE, me LT RESOL -vim: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 15th day of June, 1988, Development District Amendment 88-01 changing the District designation from Medium Residential to Low- Medium Residential for those properties located north of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue extension, and west of Deer Creek Channel. ,F) II i' c :y ORDINANCE NO. AM MUMICE OF-TIE CITY CO MOIL OF BE CITY or IAKM'. CUtVMMOA, NMING SIMSECTION 11.08.010 -C Ale 17:12.050_ B, AN MUM A NEW SUBSECTION 17.10.06" TO TNE•OANCNO CUCA MCA'MMICIPAL COK PERTAININC`TO YEIIICL! PAmIK MITHIN i N RESIKKITAL, COMEMCIAL/OFFIM AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS. A. Recitals. Ii) on ma:t 085' 1988, the Plannln99 Cometssien of the City of Rancho Cucamonga con c a'�i+ly noticed public Baring with respect to the foilowiny proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (hereinafter referred to as the 'Development Code") reyardin regulations for vehicle parking within residential, comerclai and lndustrtal districts of the City. hetting, tilelPlanning Commission Adoptodlits es u o&-o-'88 jjICl, thereby recommending that this Council adopt the proposed Development Cdddda�- aoendments as set forth in this Ordinance. (111) On ��v 9 �� , 1988, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga con c`�uMM- A udUty noNad public hearing with respect to the proposed Davelopment Code amendments as set forth here in and said hearing vas concluded prior M the adoption of this Ordinance. (1v) All 10941 prerequlslted prior to cne adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. drdfna.�ce. THE CITY CDUt;.^.IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHDA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That all of the facts set forth In the Recitals, Part A. of this Dr n3i ante are true and correct. Rancho Cucamonga isbherebynamendedOto read,tIn words aandnfigures,fas follewws: C. YehICle Parkin . The parking of vehicles in all residential s r e s s 4 a subiect to the following provisions. 1. The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.12 of the Development Code; 2 carport orrothershall requiredworhauthorized enclosed off- streetepayed parking area; 1 �a u r; 9, Fags 2 3. All- parking areas within public view from the street, right -of -ray, or adjacent properties shall be paved wpuila material. eyintaMad to atusaabli ndition fraeho* putlales and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and /or dust, without accumulation of loose material or other.. deterioration; 4. Vehicles may be parked or stored in the`side or rear yard' provided that such area is screened from vlme from the street, public right- of-way and adjacent properties by a fence wall, or equ'wa)ent screening materiel at least five (5) feet 1n height; )� - 5. Vehicle parking within side and roar yard areas shall be ' limfttd to five percent (5S) of th3 total 'lot area or five hundred (500) square feet, whichever is greater, unless constructad pursuant to an approved Minor 0evelupemnt',Heview; 6. Except as provided in Subsactfon 9 herein, vehicles parked within public view in required or authorized parking areas within the front yard, cornrr side yard or side yard abutting a street shall be parked it left standing for temporary periods of Lima not to exceed five (5) consecutive days; 7. 'vehicles' as used 1r. this section shall include, but not ' be limited to, commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi - trailers, motorcycles, mopeds, campers , ershells, boats or other large portable recreatioc nal and commercial equipment; and, 8. NO Commercial vehicle which exceeds a gross weight of one and one -half (l and 1/2) tons, or exceeds a width of eighty (80) inches or exceeds a height of seven (7) feet - or exceeds a length of tMenty -five 25) feet; no specialized work related vehicle (e.g. towtrock, stakebid trucks, etc,) and no specialized work related portable equipment (e.g. cement mixers, trailers, etc.); shall be parked on aqy portion of a residential lot unless: il) it 13 actively involved in making pick -ups and deliveries; (2) in connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a service to, or on, the property where .Y, the vahfele 1s parked, while actively involved to such ; _• activity; or (3) in conformance with the conditions of r approval for a valid HM OCcup:tion Permit as'provfded in 5 tf 17 ac on 0.,060 of the Oeveiopesnt Ccda; �r r, 9 Ordinance Mo. r - Page 3 g. Mo prlyi!". weight of m width of at! (7) feet or and no trail front or no n- lhecceedss and e half (and1 /2)tons exceeds a fity (80) inches, or exceeds a hetpghht of seven exceeds a length of twenty -five (2S) feet; or, semi- trailer, boat or portable e� larparked a innrd,corn s de yard orsid yd abutting s: (1) it is not a coemarcial vehicle.and (2C) temporary , (pertad to involved n loading activity; and 2(3) it is parked in - Ith any other applicable City ordinance; 10. Violation of any provision o punishable as an infraction. f this subsection shall be SECTION 3: Subsection 17.12.030 -I+(8) of the Development Code of the City of Rant o ucaannga is hereby amended to .read, in words and figures, as follows: 8- HIV secondary paved driveway or extension of the primary drivoW shall not be used for parking unless: (1) it connects the primary driveway access to a second access Point rcular driveway) withrecontinuoustpave mment(width not exceeding teolve (12) feet; (21 it is an extension of the primary driveway, toward the nearest side or rear yard area; or (3) is constructed Pirsuant to on approved Minor Development Review. SECTION 4: Subsection 17.10,050 -0 is hereby added to the Development follow of Rancho Cucamonga to be read, in words and figures, as 0. Vehicle Parkin . The parking of vehicles in &I, coamerc a o ce and Industrial districts shall be subject to the following provisions: 1 facllities shalliconform to thheaprovisionspofkChapter 17.12 of the Oevalopment Code and any applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; 2. Vehicle parking shall be within buildings, garages or other required or authorized off -street paved parking facilities. 3. All parking facilities within public view from the street, public right -of -ray or adjacent property shall be paved with a permanent paving material. Such area shoji i a Ordfnancf No. Page 4 a be maintained in a useable condition free of potholes and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and /or dust, without accumulatfcn of loose material or other t deterioration; 4. No vehicle shall be parked for the purpose of displaying such vehicle for sale or other commercial activity, including, but not limited to, lease, hire, advertising, etc. unless such vehicle is parked by, or with the written permission of, a business on the property which is permitted, licensed and approved to display vehicles for such purposes; 5. No vehicle shall be parked for the purpose of repair or aaintenaece un1SSS: (1) such work is performaO an vehicles owned or operated by the on -site business within an enclosed building or yard area screened from view from the street, public right -of -way aq)acent properties and required access; ff rc ss; or(2)in cOrdUct i s L fon withacu rrent on-sits business permitted to perform repair or maintenance of vehicles and colt' during established business hours; 6. No vehicle which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative or from which an essential or legally required operating part is moved or missing shall be parked within public view from the stmt, public right - of -w;Y, adjacent properties or required off -street parking facilities with public access; 7. No cae•ercial vehicle exceeding a gross weight of one and one -half (1 and 1/2) tons, or exceedfny a width of eighty (80) inches, or a trailer or semi - trailer shall be parked within a commercial /office district unless: (1) it is screened from public view from the street public right - invo�ednlnaediktngtplekMupsiand deliveries; or oractively in connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a service to, or on, the property where the vehicle Is parked, while actively involved in such activity; 8. 'Yehleles' as used in this section shall include, bat not be limited to, commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, sent- trSilars, motor yclss, mopeds, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational or commercial equipment; 9- Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an infraction. c4g-gg" SELTIgr 5: The Cftj•toursc�fl decli section. SrOs'thst,,shOuld4&VjrovIs on . paragraph; santencCor. word of this ordinance te renderad-or'd- ft"la'red'w invalid by a.-jy:ffn&l courtlactionjn 4 court ot.coqqpetmat��Vrisdictfom, -or. by reason of any pr@cmptjv#,lQgjsl&tjo", the Amsaining rovjsiofls;.wtions.,k- paragraphs, sontences;-•and words•of,this 6rdfn&nc*_s9&ll.,jvmin in f and effect. 'I I.-J 1:_- '. ." Lforce SECTION'f: , lli'6iiy;Ovrk:ihali 6artify to tWpassaie'of viii Ordinarl-ce and SWET—Cause the sum, I to,bcpublish@d**ithIm ffftagn (1 )-Fdays :&fter; its, passage at least one j n'-The'Daily Report 4-newspaptr of. general circulation-, published in the Cfty-of arlo, C�ImaOrnfa; and circulated•in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 2_� t i ORDINANCE NO. AN OROIMANCE•OF %THE RANCIID CUC410ki CITY COUNCIL^ APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AME"ENT No, W02 A REQUEST'TO CHANGE'DEVELOPMENT'DISINICT DESIGNATIONS AS 110 CURRENTLY EXIST, TO VICTORIA PLAMMED COMMUNITY (VPC) FOR ELEVEN ARFAS'NIININ THE-VICTORIA PLANNED _ COMMUNITY The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: following: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and deterrinas the A. That the Planning Commission of the City of, Rancho Cucasonga, following a public,hearing held in the " time and manner`prascribed by law, rncommemis the rezoning of,the prnperty harotnrfter described, and this city,Council M% held a public hearing'.in tl,e time and nanntr prescribed'by law and duly heard and considered said recom3ndatton. 8. That this rezoning-ta consistent with the iieneral Plan of the City o! Penchi; Cucamonga. C. That this rezoning is eonsiatant with the objectives of the DevtlopmeM' code of t:hu city of Rancho Cucamonga. 0. That this rezoning will have no signMcant environmental impact as provided in the Migative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following &scribed real property is hereby rezoned in the wanner siated, and the Developmtnt District Nap is hereby amended as indicated on Exhibit 'A'. lg %�' i N r -, a a1i�(a i1� f a v fr ^F - •'J l.. ! V.P.C. GA T'•a .! f� CARYN rrF ODf9' M -oZ PLANNED -\I• TITLE. e2O? r P.",, 3MMUNITY EXHIBMA_ Highland Avenue now oc 100 a`i o' 00 RC`3 Y.P. r` 'oothill Boulevard Op FC 1CRC 1MMUNITY •� VICTORIA P NNED Ei P JSPRR V.P.C. K V.P.C. Hider Avenue u a u 1 . oc 100 a`i o' Y.P. ' q►q </ 'oothill Boulevard Op •� r NEW DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP DEPICTING THE OUT Q 00 PARCELS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY c 00 O o food N_ORTI- wo OKDINANCE.00. M-;ONDIWAMCErMs TW� RANCHO s ORYCITf--, CoUMC IL'eApdPflk� - ,� V*, YliTo�RIA cmcmlTy,.PLA,M�ANENMWT.WU2.,*"AN ANEWIMENT.To ANNEX CERTAI U4UT,PAKCELSAWITHIW?THEj - VICTORIA,CMMNITY AREA'TO THE - VICTORIA; PLANED COMMUNITY= --APM:?"227-011-8 -THROM ll-,,'227-091-4,,45,'L.46;,Z!7-411-75; 227491-9. 26, 49,:50; 221491--18 through 22 „25;;43; 227-111-1. 33,,,38; 227-171-19,' 227-161-10, 24. MAND 227-111-27.',30.•AMO 227-171-21; 227-211-7.L-28;'39;.'229-021-56-. 227-211103,<; '7 30. as follows: The City Council Of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga; California. ,oas ordain SECTION 1: The Cii Cour-11 hereby-finds'and•deteraines the following: A. That the ' Planniiq Commission of the CIO of 'Rancho' Cucamonga, fol lowf ng'a' public hearing hold ln,the,'tiam and'un6arzprescribed by law, recnlmmnds the razonfing of the property +hervinafter. -described and this CityjCouncil has helUa, public hearing in the timil,and ' minner mnd prescribed by law and duly heard and considered s&Wl recolmation�. 8. That this Community Plan_amendaent is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucawngs.- C. That this Co' 'pity Plan amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the Ci*, of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This Community Plan amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2. The Community Plan of the Victoria Planned Community is hereby--a-se-nde-ras indicated on Exhibits 'Am, Wand *C.0 yl dr" � x: � :, �v � ^pfd - - _ .^+-• . , .y.w ,...,.7�,�....c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT "ls ..,Y - A . C +. f LL 1 ZZ DATEt June 28, 1988 TO: City Council Members and City Hsna3er FROH-. Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Hangar `s SUBJSCTS REFUSE HATE REVIEW RF.COHO:NDATIOH It is recommended the City Council approve the attached Resolution adjusting the mmeinum residential rate for refuse collection from 67.95 to 48.85 per math and a corresponding adjustment of 11% in commercial rates for basic refuse service effective August 1, 1988. Backzround The three tasidential haulers in Reecho Cucamonga are requesting the City authorize a 80.90 (11.31) edjustment in basic refuse service. Thic adjustment is necessitated by a 22.7% increase in the County's tipping fees. The tipping Fen factor is outside be control of the refuse haulers. This proposed rato adjustment is requested to take affect August 1, 1988 and is the only rtgular rate review allowed for this yaar. In reviewing the quested rate adjustment, the following areas will be investigated; dump tee costs and Consumer Price Index. Each of theme will take a major role in providing inforittiom on the proposed rate adjustment. Dump Fee Costa Ban Bernardino County at the Neat Valley Solid Waste Landfill site (Hillhteen) has been experiencing large increases in operating and maintenance costa due to shrinking landfill capacity, increasing coats for closures, sad emulating concerns regarding the environment. Theme expanses and preparation for the future have resulted in the landfill fee being rained 22.7% effective July 20, 1988. The new fee per ton deposited will be 410.55; an increase from 48.60 per ton. This 41.95 increase reprasents a direct coat of 40.41 each nanLh par residential nit. The formula for this ie to followst W7 DATEt June 28, 1988 TO: City Council Members and City Hsna3er FROH-. Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Hangar `s SUBJSCTS REFUSE HATE REVIEW RF.COHO:NDATIOH It is recommended the City Council approve the attached Resolution adjusting the mmeinum residential rate for refuse collection from 67.95 to 48.85 per math and a corresponding adjustment of 11% in commercial rates for basic refuse service effective August 1, 1988. Backzround The three tasidential haulers in Reecho Cucamonga are requesting the City authorize a 80.90 (11.31) edjustment in basic refuse service. Thic adjustment is necessitated by a 22.7% increase in the County's tipping fees. The tipping Fen factor is outside be control of the refuse haulers. This proposed rato adjustment is requested to take affect August 1, 1988 and is the only rtgular rate review allowed for this yaar. In reviewing the quested rate adjustment, the following areas will be investigated; dump tee costs and Consumer Price Index. Each of theme will take a major role in providing inforittiom on the proposed rate adjustment. Dump Fee Costa Ban Bernardino County at the Neat Valley Solid Waste Landfill site (Hillhteen) has been experiencing large increases in operating and maintenance costa due to shrinking landfill capacity, increasing coats for closures, sad emulating concerns regarding the environment. Theme expanses and preparation for the future have resulted in the landfill fee being rained 22.7% effective July 20, 1988. The new fee per ton deposited will be 410.55; an increase from 48.60 per ton. This 41.95 increase reprasents a direct coat of 40.41 each nanLh par residential nit. The formula for this ie to followst i, •_A L f� Refuse gate Review Page 2 y" June 28, 1968 1. Each residential unit in an average generates two receptacles full of refuse weekly. 2. Each receptacle contains approzirately 48 pounds of refuse (96 pounds per week). 3. 96 pounds per week Z 52 wake u 4,992 (5,000 pounds). 4. 5,000 pounds - 2.5 tons. S. 2.5 tons Z $1.95 par ton increase - $4.88. 6. $4.88 per year divided by 12 months - $0.41 per month. This $0.41 should be considered a pass through cost. Moreover, the City Council should be aware that $10.55 per ton is a low fee for an urban area. As the landfill site amaze capacity and alternative methods of disposal are developed, tte costs will risa. A cost of $15.00 to $20.00 per ton within the next three ynars is very probable. Consumer Price Index The Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles /Long Beach metropolitan area (all urban coosumers) for the period goverbar, 1986 (index 333.8) through May, 1988 (360.4) was an increase of 8.02. If the 41 taut dump fee increase is viewed as a direct pass through cost to each residential wit, then in essence the refuse haulers are requesting a $0.49 adjustment. This represents a 6.12 increaao — 65% of the CPI for the pest 18 months. A full CPI increase would be $.64, or a tetal adjustment of $1.05 ($0.41 dump fee and $0.64 CPI). Other West Valley City Refuse Rites It is very difficult to utilize a comparison of other cities' refuse rates to determine equitability. The major comparative factor Rancho Cucamonga has vfih the other cities in the West Talley area is that our refuse is deposited -at the Milliken dump site along with Ontario, Upland, Chino ad Montclair. The Los Angeles cities to Our war and tb,. San Bernardino cr..es to our most utilize other landfill sites. From that point, a comparison may be made of the three other West Valley cities that utilize contractual refuse collection services (Chino, Upland and Montclair). These cities have three factors in common which Rancho Cucamonga does not. These factors are: ?.3'#;'�tij�= x-=',• : 1'c ;!lit; `Y :'t';s;.�;�'.�iy@;," a i ^ - ...y 's'i; Yy w' Refuse Rate Ravi" lz' page 3 $3y June 28, 1988 c S A. Mandatory service - Upland, Chino and Montclair all id have mandatc.y refura'collection service= Rancho Cucamage does wet. Approximately 2 -5Z of Rancho tai Cucamonga residents do not ha6e refuse service., It ar in estimated half of these residents dispose of their K" refuse in a lawful canner. The other half are utilizing t" roan other method to dispote of their refuse (combining their refuse with aeighbora, dropping their refuse off at a commercial center without permiosion, of "i dumping their refuse in an open field). This unlawful disposal of refuse causes an adverse impact on the rates for those who d£ep000 of their refuse in a lawful manner. B. City billing - Upland, Chino and Montclair bill their residents directly for refuse service (included on resident's cater bill). In Rancho Cueamonga each battler d; bills hia cuotoaera directly. The cost of accounting, s printiog, postage and processing; boa a direct impact on the rates. C. City absorbs oon- paymut - Upland, Chino and Montclair pay the bawler for pickap even if the resident does not pay for refuse service. In Reecho Cuumouga, if the resident does not pay for the service, the hauler absorbs the loss. The current monthly rate and "best guess" potential adjustment for the other Vest valley Cities utilizing contractual refuse hauling services are as follovss Current Rate proposed Adjustment Chino $7.21 $CPI + dump fee Montclair $8.39 $CPI + dump fee Upland $8.85 $CPI + ducp fee Rancho Cucawng• $7.95 $0.49 CPI + $0.41 dump fee (Total $0.90 adjusrmeut) The proposed increases stated above are "bast guess" projections and do not reflect any City Coanril actions as of this point in time. - �9l J 'i 4� Mir Refuse Sate Review - •a �`• Page 4 7une.28, 1988; Refuse service Received k Hach complaint the 'City receives from a resident concerning refuse service' in' •,� legged. The City bas received four (4) in the past siehteeu -(18) months. It', should be noted that mach week', the haulers pick up approximately 17,000- " „• residential units which 4"tes to approximately 1,315,800 duricf'this period. # With the four complaints and tbe- number of services, the projected probability - of a resident calling Citj Hall with a complaint regarding refuse service is 1 in 328,950. i F� $8 $8 $4 $ -- 1980 1981 1982 1t3Ei;J i1014 lou� =Residential Rates EJ Dump Fee 1988X Adjustment With Full C.P.I. R RESIDENTIAL Dollars _. $10 $10 REFUSE RITES 1 �. I F� $8 $8 $4 $ -- 1980 1981 1982 1t3Ei;J i1014 lou� =Residential Rates EJ Dump Fee 1988X Adjustment With Full C.P.I. r $12 Dollars $10 $8 $8 $4 $2 $0 DUMP FEE INCREASE 1984 1985 1987 1988 =Increases DUMP FEE INCREASE A. EACH RESIDENTIAL UNIT ON AN AVERAGE GENERATES TWO RECEPTACLES FULL OF REFUSE WEEKLY. S. EACH RECEPTACLE CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 48 POUNDS OF REFUSE (96 POUNDS PER WEEK). C. 96 POUNDS PER WEEK X 62 WEEKS ■ 4,992 (6,000 POUNDS). F D. 6,000 POUNDS ■ 2.6 TONS E. 2.6 TONS x $1.96 PER TON INCREASE W $4.88 F. $4.88 PER YEAR DIVIDED BY 12 MONTHS in $.41 PER MONTH RESIDENTIAL REFUSE RATES Dollars $10 r' M M $4 $2 $0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1986 1988 1987 1988 ® Residentlai Rates 0 Proposed Adjustment j1'14'- f3..�, � Y�;yY1G r- ;ro*. �M:9wr;•':w"'; 'eS 4 ",_. t` 3P � ': ta.» ..+.. ._. .t ^.Y: . .'), ti_.a�1v. k. � r.], W+6.:? : i`y`� ?..: Y -3`,Rn � �..'..•r`r'il'v >. - .. _- .. h WEST: VAL»LE ,i ,;CfTY REFUSE RATES %3 Currint, PmMad Adlustmsnt CHINO =7.21 GPI +DUMP FEE MONTCLAIR $8.99 CPI + DUMP FEE UPLAND =8.86 CPI + DUMP FEE RANCHO CUCAMONGA $7.95 =.49 CPI #$.41 DUMP FEE - &90 ADJUSTMENT s J 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -#6'6) , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MCAMIOA. CALIFORNIA. 8E'1'SIM3 )VMMON RATES FOR RESrUERTIAL an OOM)ERmwrNWSTR AL REIUSE WLLBCfIH1 WI7R2R In CITY OF RANCHO COrAMOCA WHEREAS, the Citj, Council of the City of Rancho Cueamonga recognises that effective July 20. 1988 the County of San Bernardino will substantially Increase the tonnage fees for refuse deposited at the Milliken Landfill site b7 22.75) and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that sine* January 1. 1987, the last adjustment in rates for residential refuse collection, there have been substantial increases in general operating expenses and employee rages by the permit refuse baulera within the City of Rancho Cucamonga{ and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cutamonga'bas determined that it is uecesesry for the efficient operation and mansgaaent.of the residential refuse collection service within Rancho Cucamonga that the maslasn ratoo be adjusted. NOW. 7HEREICRS. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the rates listed below become effective August 1. 19881 SECTION It Caarnes for Service - Residential. A. Basic Individual Residential Unit rate utilizing curb service and individual payment. 1. Maximum monthly rate $8.85 per service. 2. Maxima: monthly rate differential for service north of Banyan Crreat $.70 per otvice. 3. Maximus monthly rate for senior citizen $6.90. ` a. Senior citizen shall be anyone sixty-rro (62) years old. hoed of household, and have a request with permittee. B. Multiple Residential Unit rate utilising curb service and group payment. 1. Maximus monthly rate shall be $8.85 for the first unit and $7.85 for each unit thereafter. l6 Resolution No. 68-+ee ll✓ Page 2 t' `c 2. Maximum monthly rate differential for service north of Banyan $.70 per unit. C. Multiple Residential Unit rate utilizing three (3) cubic yard refuse containers. 1. Maximum monthly rate shall be as follows in respect to frequency of service. a. One service weekly $ 52.50 b. Two service■ weekly $ 81.00 C. Three services weekly $109.50 d. tour gamiest weekly $138.00 ,. e. Five services weekly $166.50 f. Six services weekly $195.00 D. Temporary carviee (lace than thirty (30) days ). 1. Three (3) cable yard containers. a. Maximum rate of $42.50 for anon (7) days at location. b. Maximum rate of $26.00 for each additional service (drop). 2. Roll off container up to maximum forty (40) cubic yards. a. Mazimm rate of $171.00 per service (dump). however. container shall be serviced (dumped) at least once every savan (7) days. SECTION 2: Charges for Service - Comorcial /Industrial. A. Commercial and Industrial rate utilizing one and one half (1 -1 /2) cubic yard refuse containers: 1. Mazimm monthly rate shall be as follows in respect to frequency of service. I • / fir" � / V Umcompacted Compacted s. One service weekly S 43.50 $ 65.00 b. Two servi too weekly $ 63.50 $ 95.00 C. Three services weekly S 83.50 $125.00 Monthly rates in respect to frequency shall not be leas than 85% of the stated ma:imm rate. I • / fir" � / V Resolution No. 88,sss ; Page 3 8. Commercial and industrial rate utilising two (2) cubic yard refuse containers: 1. Maximum month:y rata shall be as follows in reapect to frequency of service. un- coapacted Cmpacteb a. Out service weekly $ 48.50 $ 72.75 b. Two services weekly $ 73.50 $110.50 C. Three services weekly $ 98.50 $148.25 Monthly rates in respect to frequency shall noc be leas than 855 of the stated aerinm service. C. Commercial and Industrial rate utilizing three (3) cubic yard refuse containers: 1. Mnimm monthly rate shall be as follows in respect to frequency of service. _ `66 Do-- coxpacted Ca'pacted a. One service weekly $ 58.00 $ 67.00 b. Two services weekly $ 89.25 $134.OD c. Three services weekly $120.50 $209.00 d. Four services weekly $151.75 $256.00 e. Five services weekly $183.00 8303.00 f. Six services weekly $214.25 $350.00 Monthly rates in respect to frequency shall not be lees than 85% of the stated maximum rate. D. Commercial and Industrial rate utilizing four (4) cubic yard refuae containerst 1. Maximum monthly rate shall be as fellows in respect to frequSncy of a rvice. Oo- compacted Cemp.cted a. One service weakly $ 68.00 $102.00 b. Two services weekly $107.00 $160.50 C. Three services weekly $146.00 $219.00 d. Four services weekly $185.00 $277.50 e. Five services weekly $224.00 $336.00 f. Six services weekly $263.00 $394.50 Monthly rates in respect to frequency shall not be leas than 855 of the stated maximum rate. _ `66 Resolution W. 88-eee Pose 4 R. Commercial and Industrial rate utilizing at. (6) containers[ cubic yard refuse 1. Maxiaw monthly rate shall be as follows in respect to frequency of service. 0 - compactod Compacted a. Caw service weekly $ 80.50 $121.00 b. Two services weekly $135.00 $202.50 C. Three services weekly $189.50 $284.00 d. your services weekly $244.00 $365.50 e. Five services weakly $298.50 $447.00 f. Biz services weekly $353.00 $528.50 Monthly rates in respect to frequency the stated maximum rate. shall not ba long than 852 of F. Food handling and food processing as defined by Chapter 8.18 (counter- balanced lid), utilising three (3) cubic yard containerst k 1. Maximum monthly rates shall be as follows in respect to fregconey _ of service. r On- compacted Compacted s Two services weakly $102.00 $134.00 b. Three aervices weekly $133.00 $181.00 C. Four services weekly $164.00 $228.00 d. Five sarvicea weekly $195.00 $275.00 e. Six services 'tat"" $226.60 $322.00 Moothly rates in respect to frequancy shall not be loss than 852 the stated maximum rates. of G. Roll off container up to meximom forty (40) ethic yards. On- compacted Compacted a. Per service (domp) $184.00 $276.00 Container aball be serviced (dusped) at least four (4) times month. per Rate iu respect to frequency shall not L, less than 852 of the meaim= rates. stated 0 E f Rzaalution r Page-.% H. Towporary, service -(Iiss than thirty (30) days). 1. Three (i) cubic yard containers. a. Maximus, rate of $42.50 for "von (7) days at location. N=iam rate of $26.00 for each additional service (dmp). Rate In respect to frequency shall not be less than 85% of the stated, %o:xism rate. 2. Roll off container up to x&xixm forty (40) cubic yards. a. Maxi" ,to of ' $104.00 per service (doop). however. container a6all 'be serviced (dmpad) at least once every w"ci.(7) days. Rate, in respect to froquancy,sball not be less than 85Z of the stated Maxiem rates. I -W , Ei .1 �ii1 "i �Pv%.ei �Va. • "\ � " :lA,aN 4�s.� e +fan .1`. C e.r ✓:r wtµ }s: 4i�' - _ � �.,ry_ Y:R'y:;� nrmar �.n n ,.r...r............. TO: City Council and.City Manager FROM: Russell H. Haguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 48 FOR TRACT NOS. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 and 13742 (VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WLMKNDATI04: It is recommended that City Council approve the attaLtted �esolutfon ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 48 to Lanuicapa Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work connection w'th Annexation No. 48 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Nos 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 and 13742 (various locations throughout the City). The developers of the subject tracts have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -359. Respectfu submitted, ,,�nmt:7—� RHM:J Attachments i 1 i I'r L C7 k f '� STAFF REPORT r DATE: J July 6, 1988 WLMKNDATI04: It is recommended that City Council approve the attaLtted �esolutfon ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 48 to Lanuicapa Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work connection w'th Annexation No. 48 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Nos 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 and 13742 (various locations throughout the City). The developers of the subject tracts have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -359. Respectfu submitted, ,,�nmt:7—� RHM:J Attachments i 1 i I'r L C7 k f '� RESOLUTION NO. S 8 -116-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEKATION NO. 48 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 WHEREAS, tie City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 1st day of June, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -360 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 48 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -360 was duly and legally published in the time, fore and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -360, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as reawired by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and SNSRCAS. ;ai,i City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to b^ derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cu-ca—mo-n-9-A-1hat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -360, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is- ere y finally approved; aid SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessmenY-Tn—f6e7En9ineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until -60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 2oel SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report 1s in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description T64s City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No.l. The City Council has determined that the areas to be odintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 and 13742 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. glans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the lands aped areas. The plans and spacifiations for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estirted Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constricted by developers. based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 includir.g Annexation No. 48 is as follows: Existing Annex New District O Total Landscape Area 1,190,966 39,660 123,064.60 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMM" 140 X� s 0� Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 :• Annexation No. 48 for Q, Tract Nos. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 11697 and 13742 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report 1s in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description T64s City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No.l. The City Council has determined that the areas to be odintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 and 13742 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. glans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the lands aped areas. The plans and spacifiations for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estirted Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constricted by developers. based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 includir.g Annexation No. 48 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No. 48 Total Landscape Area 1,190,966 39,660 123,064.60 No. of D. U. 9,781 140 9,921 s 0� i F Per Let Annual Assessment 123,064.60 x $.30 - $369,193.80 $369 328.80 - S37.23 27 x 5.00 135.00 — 9:921 -- Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assess"nt diagram. Where the development covered by this annuation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners asmfation, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION S. ASSessa!t Dlaoram A coey of the eropposed assessaent diagram is attached to this report and labeled Exhibit A , by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporate' within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment lotslwwiithinthesDistrict District found unit.l Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or paresl shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or pai s:. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1977 SECTION 7. Order of Evenca 1 City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Asprovai of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolu- + of intention to kinex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts ub c hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4 Every year in May, th• ^fV Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a ublic hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the irodividuai assessments. A Properties and flPrivtients 0 be Included within Annexati Landscape Maintenance Distr ct No. 1: On No. 48' to,,, TRACT MU MINTAINED ACA 'T 29L 12650 35 12650-4 36 13715 5 Trail - 4.980 13697 47 Vista Grove St. Trail 22,000 Haven Ave. Trail 7,600 Haven Ave. 5,100 Haven Ave. 27 13742 17 140 ... 39.680 27 x. I! . a •y� ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.,Z ANNEXATION NO. 4E 25 26 27 28 29 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 30 9 B 7 i 6 5 31 i16 15 14 13 12 11 10 4 32 • =�- 33 F I ,s 1251 rt I rl I r.8 2 •is:, � HILLSIDE ROAD ;•�i � 1.- CITY OF RANCHO CLICAhIONCA Y: i ENGINEERING DIVISION Ell 6 '' 19" VICINITY NIAP N � F i r I' ,M i .. i .. G50 i "Y i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.-% ANNEXATION NO. Qa , .. 1 H I.ILLSIOE ROAD E 1 ;S �E�C flq� ;.� CITY OF RANCHO MrA,%IOIY.3A 3 ENGINEERING DIVISION l r VICINITY MAP nn � y ,i. r l m 4i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM r. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0,.j ANNEXATION NO. qD Lee" Wmm� AMATO W WAMIUM W WT ctc CITY OF RANCHO .J s ENGINEERING DIVISION cl 6 VICINITY AIAP nn I I 2 � uwft N I I l ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.-% ANNEXATION NO. Qs t I i l s { `I I {�a l 2 fI fT M405 If 0 014, 10 7! JI os !s swig 3 /O SN fT f a /3 /Q el t1 t9 J: J r0 2 25 re ? 33 2 Z � B /9Y rQ � lT Y30 1 § e C It CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA nR 1369y it ,i ENGINEERING DIVISION irn VICINITY MAP .. ti nn ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE � DISTRICT N0.1 CY OF RANCHO CUC:A4vIONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY NIAP i I t f • 9 , _1 + J t' r Y 1 DATE: TJ: FROM: PY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CIJCANiONGA STAFF REPORT y > July 6, 1968: Ciy Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ORDERING THE'NORX IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NOS. 46;AND 30 FOR -TRACT NOS. 12650, 126504, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 (VARIVUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE•CITY) TO STREET-, LIGHTING MAINTENANCE'DISTRICT NOS 1 AND 2 PECOM EROATION: It is reoosaended that City Council approve the attaeiied resolutions —dering the Lignti. Naintenance DistrlctoNOS.�lRand 2tirespectivety�dand approving the Engineer's Reports. BACKGROUND /ANALYCIS Attac!iad for "ity Council approval are resolutions ordering the work in connection pith Annexation Nos. 46 and 30 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tbiet Nos. 12650, 1265n 4j j5715, 13697 and 13742 (various 1004tidas throughout the C1tt,,j. `The developers of the subject tracts have be" notified of the public hearing by mail. �Ae attached resolutions 414 ap Sh prove e Engimoer's Reports Wtativell approved by Resoiuti•,n Nos. 88-3$5 and 88 -357. Respect' 3 it: 1, i :JA :sjm Attackeents Z)/3 s .j• c i RESOLUTION NO. O 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 46 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT !NOS. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 1st day of June, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -356 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 46 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -356 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on ' file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed `Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -356, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Nailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the neces,ity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cu-caim-R-95­5 at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No 88 -356, be done and made; and SECTION 2. The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; an SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e1 port -are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tra—M -Have been occupied. �y ,Iv Ivy .n CITY DP RANCHO CUCANONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 atio No. 46 r Tract Nos. 12650. e12650 -4. 13715,13697 and 13742 SECTION 1. Authority for Report Chapter s1,YDivisionf15cOfpthenStreets a the nd HfohwUseCode. Ststecof 4, Californfa (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description Street LightingoMaintenance Distrit o.1e1.alThe n CityvCouncilthasne determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Nap which is on file with the Ciy Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by conditions of the developers. The plans and street lights are aaps stipulated in the Engineering Divisional Reference islheereeby madeatoathe subject the map pr development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specificatfons for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. d-/J SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs wail be incurred for street lighting Improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it ti estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on rajor streets for residential improvements (stnale family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout t6 City. Each dwelling unit In this zone will be assessed as one assess+eM unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional Ir rOects throughout the City. It has been determined tl that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and instltuticna areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. m. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost- No. of r Laps Lamps Annex Lamm Size* TTO No. 46 New L Total ' SBOOL 460 0 460 95COL 524 516 16,000L 16 0 22,000L 4 0 4 27,500L 17 0 17 •High Pressure Sodium vapor -otal Lam Size Lagos Rate No's Total Annual Maint. Cost- - - SBOOL 460 X $ 6.93 X 12 S 49,293.60 9500L 529 X $10.16 X 12 64,495.68 16,000L 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,0001. 4 X $13.84 X 12 664.32 27,5DO 17 X $15.31 X 12 3.123.24 Total Annual Maint. Cost $119,896.20 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 17,020 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 140 Total Assessment Units 17,160 air s :k 0 3. Cost oor Assessment Unit: Total Annual Naintenance Cost $119 .20 • f6.99 /year /unit r '� o. a s n str c 1V Assessment ohall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram i Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are -attached to this report and labeled Street lighting Maintenance District No. 10, y Annexation No. 46. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. a. SECTION 6. Assessaent Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to All units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. then units are based on acreage, assessment will 'd 2 units per net acre. ;> SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City ,. Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to enn:x a District and sets public hearing date. ' 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June the City Council conducts a Rublfc hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the indfvsL!!. _ •eeseents. i E E EXHIBIT 'A' Properties and - improvements to be included within Annexation No. 46 to Street Li3hting Mdntenance District 1: ' Pro ect Acreage Zone 1 TR 12650 TR 12650 -4 TR 13715 TR 13697 TR 13742 TOTAL Zone 2 " l :J Assess. No. of La z to be Annexed z8 -Unif— 3J2- dOD�Lb i:TTDDC 1 t 35 36 5 47 17 140 -- 3 - -- 2 — -n. ��i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I ANNEXATION NO. 44, CTPY OF RANCHO CUCA[ON COUNTY OF SAN BZRNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Im ■ min 1 i 26 I27 26 29 _ 17 I t 6 19 20 2' 22 23 24 25 � 30 . •tt 0 7. 6 5 I s 3. 9 101` 15 14 13 t2 32 16 �.._/� ` _�� Ii• I .`. is 4 33 ` 3 34 / 2 " ce 35 '• t 1 3[ HILLSIDE ROAD CTPY OF RANCHO CUCA[ON COUNTY OF SAN BZRNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Im ■ min 1 i , ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ` AN EXATIoN NO. 4& I u i H 1 •' i F. � b I t I ;cal ;4 I :•S I :� 1' � � 31 32 29 30 3 23 24 25 26 27 2B 33 i� n 34 17 1B i5 14 1 3B 22 21 20 19 10 13 35 9 10 — 12 1 B /11 4 _� \5 6 HILLSIDE ROAD cm OF RANCHO CUCAl ollaA A I� s s, COtyy OF BAN BERNARDWO STATE OF CAL17ORNIA N Im i�