Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/08/03 - Agenda PacketPA4E d city Council Agenda August 3, 1988 1 In ��j'+, All its" submitted for the City Comaeil Agenda most be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5100 ' p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all arch items. �F , A. CALL TO Oxw { 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Y3ag. 2. Roll Call: Steve Buquat , Stout .Ir I Being _, and WrigCt _. AMUNCgliNY6/YR63BNTATIOKS NHS' 3o icoma submitted. C. CONSIST CALENDAR 1 The following Consent Calander items are =peered to be �• routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without diseussio0. Aar item may be removed by a Comeilmember or member of the audience for discu8e100. 1. Approval of Minutest June 15, 1985 June 28, 1988 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 7/20/88 and 7/27/88, 1 and Payroll ending 7/21188 for the total amount of 01,05 1,393.24. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule 12 as of July 3f, 1988. 4. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Otf -Sale Beer -- -21 6 Wine, Arrow Plaza Market, Peter S. DeJoger, 9755 Arrow Highva7, #B. 5. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Off -Sale 23 General, Poothill Liquors, Bun Dong b Jung Wan Kim, 8161 W. Foothill Boulevard. 6. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Off -Sale Beer 25 6 dine, The Lunch Stop, Chong 6 Hoag Beim, 9631 Business p Center Dr., Suite G. � Y r g , City Cwncil Agenda yA' 3+ August: 3, 1988 PAGE 2 , i r 7. Approval to authorize the advertising of the lotito 27 Inviting Bids", for the Via Carillo Drive Ltprovemeat Project, from Avenida Vejar to Bast of Cierre Hadra Av-jus to be funded from Grants C.D.B.O. Ancouat No. 28- 4833 -8704. RES OLUT10N NO. 88-478 28 A NHSOLUTIOH, OP !J6 CITY COUNCIL Or To CITY OF RAFC7.0 COCAY.ORGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLM;S AND 'SPECIFICATIONS PON THE CONSTRUCTION, OP`VL1 CARILLO DRIVE INPROVd16NY PROJECT pBON-MMA MAR TO ' LAST OF SUXRk HAD29 LVENUS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY =RC TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 8. Approval to authorize the advertising of tba "Notice 32 Inviting Side" for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue Improvement Project to b3 fuuded from TDA /Article $- Account No. 12 -4637 -8824. RESOLUTTOH NO. 88-479 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF &ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LICHTING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVIRMZ -, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVEUTISS TO RECEIVE BIDS 9. Approval to award the Archibald Avenue Widening 37 Improvement Project between Highland Avenue to Lemon Avenue to Bob Britton Company, Incorporated, for the amount of 8124,925.15 to be funded from Systems Developmane Fund, Account No. 22 -4637 -8755. 10. Approval to accept and execute a Real Property 39 Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 88 -120) from Beverly Pishbeck, and release of Same from Jaws A. and Bevorly Fishback for a single family residence, located on the north side of Victoria Street, east of East Avenue. PAGE Avlil��-,Izwwo City Council Agenda August 3, 1988 3 '•a o q RESOLUTION N0. 88-480 40L, A RESOLDTION, OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACLWTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT: FROM BEVERLY FISUBACE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY C' TO SIGN THE SAM - 18CLUTION NO. 88-481 41 A RESOLUTIOU OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JAMES A. AND BEVERLY FISMBACE 11. Approval to execute an amendment to an Improvement 43 Agreement and Dedication (OD 88 -121) with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Clark H. Booaan and Marjorie C. Bowen for the Amethyst Avenue Reconstruction at 19th Street, to clarify future street improvement requirements for Nineteenth Street along the Beason's property frontage. RESOLUTION NO. 88-482 44 A RESOLUTION OF TO CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOUGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH CLARK N. BOESEN AND MARJORIE C. BOESEN FOR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FOR AMETHYST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT NINETEENTH STREET 12 Approval to execute an amendment to an Improvemeat 45 Agreement and Dedication (OD 88 -122) with the City of - - Reecho Cucamonga and William H. Lane and Janet W. Lana for the Amethyst Avenue Reconstruction at 19th 8areet, ' to clarify future •treat improvement requiramenta for Nineteenth Street along the Lane's property frontage. P o q `ter City Council Agenda August 3, 1988 PACE 4 a r RESOLUTION NO. 88-483 46 A RESOLUTION 07 TIM CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM H. LANE AND JANET W. LANE FOR INSTALLATION 07 IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FOR AMETHYST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT NINETEENTH STREET 13. Approval to execute Agreements for Engineering Services 47 for Hop and Plan Checking with C 0 Engineering On S8- 123)1 Darbisb, Guerra rrd Associates (00 88 -1201 and Don Greek and Associate@ (CO 88 -125), for VY 1988 -89. 14. Approval to execute contract (CO 80 -126) for computer 48 maintenance for Apple computer hardware with Computerland of Upland in the amcunt of $6,652 to be funded from ccutract services Account No. 33. 4130.6028. 15. Approval to execute ieprov� ;meat agreement and Security 50 for construction. of Henyoo 1(ay, Park •s recorded on Tract Map 13442 and Vintage Park as recorded on Tract Map 13445. RESOLUTION NO. 88-484 54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 701 EENYON XkY PAGE TRACT 13342 AND VINTAGE PARE TRACT 13445 16. Approval to accept the Traffic Signals and Safety 55 Lighting at Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a notice of completion and approve the final _ contract amaunt of $78,000. RESOLUTION NO. 88-485 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORIMIA, ACCEPTING 1M PUSLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT HAVEN AVENUE AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Agenda QiO' A.'s•�° August 3, 1988 PAGE rrf •: °r S a 17. Approval to accept the Btivacda Cobblestone Curbs 57 Improvemut Project as complete, release bonds and authorise the City Engineer to file a notice of completion and approve the final contract amount of $56,491.84. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -486 s 58 , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE i i CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOHCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH13 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE y BTIWANDA COBBLESTONE CURBS IHPROVSMENr c, PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 186 Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and 59 II for the proposed Etivanda Area I and 7.I Street Rehabilitation and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLUTION NO. 88-487 60 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL 07 THE CITY Of RAUCEO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCZ OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ETINANDA AREA I AND II STREET REHABILITATION 19. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and 7E II for the proposed Via Carrillo Street Improvements from Avenida Vejar to Sierra Madre Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLUTION NO. 88-488 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM ONGA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL. EEEHPTION FOR THE PROPOSED VIA CARRILLO STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM AVENIDA VEJAR TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUE 20. Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds and file a notice of completion fort DR 86 -12 located on the south aide of Arrow eiehvay. 85 east of Hadrone Avenue PACE City Council Agenda y9a,� August 3, 1988 6 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $446,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -489 86 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL Or IRS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86 -12 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR 86 , located on the north side of Jersev Boulevard 87 east of Utica Avenue Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 11,500 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -490 88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVRHZUM FOR DR 86 -38 AND AUT'dORIZING INS FILING OF A NOTICE OP ^WLETION FOR THE WORE Parcel Nap 9829 located on the northwest corner of 89 Spruce and Elm Avenues Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 88,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88-491 90 A RESOLUTION Or THd CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOi PARCEL MAP 9829 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR 06 -15 located on the south side of Asonn Street 91 betveen Red Oak Street and Utica Avenue Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 11,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88-492 92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COURICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86 -15 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE HORS i PAGE �•. F�7 /S City Council Agenda �. o y �° August 3, 1988 7 �F! Tract 10277 located on the north side of Almond Street 93 east of Cereal an Avenue oF•F�, Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 8 25,056 a:. Aeceptt 4 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 9 2,505 0 RESOLUTION NO. 88-493 94 f A RESOLUTION OP TaE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT$ FOR TRACT 10271 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF ;, A NOTICC OF COMPLETION YOH THE WORK 21. Approval to accept improvements, release of Maintenance 95 c Guarantee Bond for Tract 12740 located on the south side of Arrow Highway vest of Center Avenue. Releasat i Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 8 20,500 22. Approval to seek Request for Proposal to develop the 96 design development phase of the Central Park conceptual design approved by Council on September 3, 1987. 23. Approval to purchase the real property defined as the 105 easterly 155.0 feet of Assessor Parcel No. 0208 -011 -28, 7389 Lion Street, Dsecho Cucamonga, California, for the sun of 925,000 from Mark and Kathleen Johnson. 24. Set public hearing for September 71 1988, for a - 107 Environmental Assessment Review for the proposed modification of the Foothill Boulevard- Interstate 15 Interchange. RESOLUTION NO. 88-494 108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WACHO CUCAMONGA, CA7 IFORNLA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC NEARING DATE Of WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1988 FOR THE PROPOSED INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION ENVIROMIENTA1. ASSSSSHEM REVIEW i a r i Y r. r.. a' i Wl ,i n x PACE '7 August 3, 1988 A/1-01W7 C£Cy Council Agenda + 8 D. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances bava bad public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be .outina and uon- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. ♦ny item can be removed for di#euseion. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AIENDHENT 88 -06 PREZONE - TEUMCB MELCHER - A request to preaone a 96 acre portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for prenoning purposes) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Stiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - AYH 225 -071 -65. ORDINANCE NO 364 (second reading) 110 AN ORDLWANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1'H.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVrNG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DSVELOPPBNT DISTRICT AMENDMENT, DDA 88- 06, ShQUBSTING TO AMEND TAE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT HAP FOR THE PURPOSE OF PEE20NING TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PEA. ACRE) FOR 96 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 1113 NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETLNANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT aCREEan BE- 01- TERRANCE MELC.ER - A request 1 approve a Development Agreeaant for development and annexation of a 96 acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for anuexation purpose#) located At the northwest corner of Stivanda Avenue and 24th Street - APH 225 -071 - 65. ORDINANCE NO. 365 (second reading) 112 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 88-01 - TZRRAHCE HSLCHER, FOR ANNEXATION AND DEVSLOPHENr OF A 96 ACRE PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREA LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWWA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET PAGE, .t� City Council Agenda '0 'v a August 5, 1988 9 'r E. ADVERTISED PUELIC NEARISC9 The following items have been advertised and /or posted as public hearings an required by law. The chair will open the meeting to receive public tawtimomy. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL 039 PCRMIT 87- 119 41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT - An appeal of the Planing Cosmissi� decision denying the development of a ecbool district fscilit7 consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot trsosportsciou- ittonincd building o0 5.25 acres of land in the low residential district (2-4 dwelling units per sere), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APH 202- 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three mature trees. (Continued from 7/20/88 meeting). 2. n'VIRONI ML INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCR 152 OF A NEGATIVE BECLAHASION FOR TnE 19TH STRESS IWWVSMENTB FROM WEST CITY LI1QT8 TO JASPER STREET. RESOLUTION NO. 88-495 153 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL. OF TM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A I.iiCATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET INPROVElENT3 FROM WEST CITY LIMITS TO JASPER PTREET 3. ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE 168 OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION YOH THE 19TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO CASTILLA AVENUE. RESOLUTION N0. 88-495 169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIB.OSM[BNTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PR( JSED 19TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO CASTILLA AVENUE 'r PAGE $Ji . r City Council Agenda August 3, 1988 m 10 4. APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 185 REVIEW 68 -03 - SMITH - Appeal of the Planning Cosmission decision requiring 1) in -lieu fees for r:tility uudergrcunding, and 2) off -site street inpravements fnr the development of a 20 unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land in the MedLw High Roaidential District (14 -24 dvelling units per acre), located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue cud Main Street - APE 207- 251 -22. 5. AN AMENDMENT TO THE VESTING TENTATIVE NAP SECTION OF TEE 225 CITY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE THE REGULATION OF NON- BESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS. ORDINANCE NO. 280 -A (first reading) 235 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO e- -'KONCL, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTICI: .49.030 (A) AND 16.49.040 (A) 07 ..,d RANCHO CUCADHGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROCESSING CF VERTING TENTATIVE MAPS 6. ORDERING THE WORK IN ODHNZCTION WITH: A. ANNEXATION NO. 31 FOR TRACT NO. 13318, LOCATED ON 236 THE 99UTHEAST CORNER 01 HERMOSA AVENUE AND MANZANITA DRIVE. TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2. RESOLUTION NO. CB-497 237 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITS ANNEZATICH N0. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ALD ACCEPTING - TS8 FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13318 B. ANNEXATION No. 47 FOR TRACT NO. 13318. PARCEL MAP 243 10941 CUP 87 -19 CUP 87.42 D( 87-41 AND DR 87 -52 VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGH T tCE CITY 't0 STREET I LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. urv6e. a PAGE; City Council Agenda Al r, August 3, 1988 ti s ' RESOLUTION NO. u 198 244 ' A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORE, IN CONNECTION W27H ANNOTATION NO. 4'9 TO STREET LIGHTING Mk7HTEHAHCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER!& REPORT FOR TRACT 1:D, 13318, PARCEL NAP,'10941, CUP 87 -19, CUP 87-12, DR 87-41, JAD DR 87 -52 C. ANNOTATION NO. 13 FOR PARCEL IMP 10941 DR 87 -52 25f, AND COP 87 -19 INDUSTRIAL COmm3RCIAL TO STREET LILLTING VAINTENANCP. DISTRICT NO. 6. RESOLUTION HO.88- 499 256 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 04 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALVORHIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXAT.ON NO. 1E TO STRUT LIGHTUG SNINTENUCI D1STXICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL NAP 10941, DR 87 -52 A" CUP 87 -19 U. ANNEXATION N0. _32 FOR PARCEL NAP 10941 DR 86 -08 263 I DR 87 -52 AND CUP 87 -19 INDUSTRIAL COMHERCIAI. TO LANDSCAPE HAIHTEYANCE OISTRICT NO. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -500 264 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANHEIATI. N 110. 22 TO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCH DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAI, ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL -- _ HAP 10941, DR 86-08, DR 87 -52 AND CUP 87- 19 E. AY- VEXATION NO. 49 FOR TRACT NO. 13318, LOCATED ON 273 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND NANZANITA DRIVE. TO LANDSCAPE YA1N`MHANCE_ DISTRICT NO. 1. urv6e. a �r N 4 � e is PAGE •`ri: �a city Council Agenda August 3, 1988 12 �t '- RESOLUTION NO. 88 -501 274 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDRRING TES HORS IN CONNECTION i1ITH ANNEXATION NO. 49 TO LANDSCAPE HAINTEUXCS DISTRICT MO. 1 AND ACCLITING THE FINAL ENGIMR'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13318 F. PUBLIC HKARIDL9 The following it=& have no legal publication or posting requireaents. The Chair will open the nesting to rxceive public testiaony. 1. CONSIDERATION THAT PARSING BE PROHIBITED ON PORTION$ OF 279 ALTA CUESTA AND VALLE VISTA TO COMPLY WITH RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INBURANCE AUTHORITY AND THE RESULTS OF THE RED HILL NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PERMIT PARKING ONLY DISTRICT FOR THE 282 ALTA LOMA RICH SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD. ORDINANCE NO. 39-C (first reading) 284 AN gRDINANCE OF To CITY CI -dCIL OF THE CIT • OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.50 TO TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHNENr OF PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM8Nr AND ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 8"l •- 291 - TERRANCE HELCHER - A request to approve an annexation agreement for development and annexation of a 96 acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the northwest corner of Etivanda Avenue mad 24th Street - APd 226 -071 -65. �r N 4 � e is PAGE City Council Atanda August 3, 1988 11 0 v� f 1 RESOLLTION NO. 88 -502 294 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY r.OUNCIL OF Tim CITY 08 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPWfING AN ANNEYATIOR ACDEEABNT FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ANNBZATIOH Of A 96 ACRE PORTIOA OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ONINL:ORrORATED AREA LOCAYED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNEA OF ETIVANDA AVENUE AND 24TH ST4EBT C CITY IWLAm'B m" RRPORTS The following items do not legally require any public tastimuny, although the Chair may open the seating for public input. 1. DISCUSSIO!I OF OVOR CONSENT AND INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC 300 PTESERVATIOW, 2. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE C.P. IS NDOSB. 5702 RAT 312 AMETHYST AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A AISTOeIC ENDNARB APN 1062 -071 -08. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -503 323 A AILSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE C.P. LEDIG HOU116 LACATED AT 5702 AMETHYST AVENUE AS A LWPHABR 3. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 7165 BTIWANDA AVENUE- 325 A7H 227- L31 -27, Continued from Juna L5, 1988 meting) RESOLUTION NO. 88-436 - -347 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE PISHL HOUSE, LOCATED AT 7165 ZTIWAHDA AVENUE, RA.4CUO CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LAHDMARR 4. UPDATE ON THE TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE - Staff will 349 bn preseoting a zapnrt on the status of future aeendments to the Tree Yreservation Ordinance. (Oontinw,d from July 20, 1988 nceting) 0 v� f 1 +fyE IIti ' PAGE ,e d City Council Agenda August 3, 1988 14 , 5. CONSIDERATION OF COUNTY COUNSHL'S OFFICE DEFENDING X51 LAWSUITS WHICH ANUS REQUESTING TAX REFUNDS FOR GTE SPRINT, ETC. V. COIINTY OF ALAlEDA. ST AL.i SOUTHFRN PACIFIC PIPE LINER, INC. V. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, ETC., BY AL.; AND, SAN DISCO PIPELINE COMPANY V. BOARD Of EQUALIZATION. HTC., ST AL. 6. DISCUSSION OF WOR. -SHOP DATE WITH TUB CHAXBHR OF 00! -MRCS 355 TO DISMSS SIGN LE MAN= C. COUNGM gQirass The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair smy opta the seating for public input. 1. SELECTIC ' OF ADVISOFY COMIESION HE M9R DUE TO VACANCY CREATT 0_BY RESIGNATION OF HOB TM AS, 2. RECYCLING UPDATE (BROWN). 356 I. I ATMIC&TION OF ITEMS pot KS= MEETING This is the time to- City Council to identify $- items they wish to dfacuss at thu neat ,,eating. These tt will not be I 1 discussed at Lhis seating, only identify + the neat 1 meeting. J. CONROMICATIONS FROM TES PUBLIC This is the tine and place rev the general public to address tha City Council. State law prohibits the City Co. cLl from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council my receive testimony and sat thu setter for - - a eubs"uent seating. Comsents are to be limited to five minutes per individual. M. ADJOUREMRCNr I, Beverly A. Autholet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 29, 1988, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Line Road. +fyE IIti , r Jima 15, 19RS, QTY OP RANCHO WCAIDNCA QTY ODUNCIL MnMTES iBr Regular NeetinR A. - CAII. TO ORDBE A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on R Wednesday, June 15, 1988, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Boss Line Road, Rancho Cucamongs. California. Too Keating was called to order at 7:30 k- p.m. by Major Dennis L. Stout. ye 3 3• Pteoent were Couneilmemberat Deborah N. Bt n, Charles J. Buquat I1. Jeffrey Ring, Pamela J. Wright. sad Mayor Dennis L. rout. '1 Also prevent were: City Manager, Lauren M. .4assatmanh Amaistant City Manager, Robert Rizzot Legal Counsel, James MArka.ny (At, ri *r;;, Beverly A. Authelett Community Development Director, Jack Lr 't -r neater, Brad Buller; City - Engineer, Russell Naguiret Community "actor, Joseph Scbultz; j, Resource Center Coordinator, Jerry Pulwcod; -TUvo Services Director, James Hart; Administrative Intern, Mane 00';Ij _ .:.:oputy City Clark. Debbie Adore. s e a * * * E. ANN0UMcEK9M /PAESEMTArioRs B1. Mayor Stout announced that the City of Rancho Cucamonga ban been selected by tbo Inland Expire Section of the American Planning Association to receive an award for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. It was also announced that City Manager Lauren Wasserman has bean selected for this year's Distinguished Leadership and Plasm 19 award. Both of those P :esentations will be made Thursday night. Jima lo. 1988. B2. Announcement of the 1988 Bicentennial Poster Contest winnars was made by Mayor Stout and Couneilmmber Brown. * * * * a C. WNSIM CALMMkR C1. Approval of Minutes: Key 25. 1988 Litt' Council Minutes June 15. 1989 Page 2 C2. Approval of Warrants, Register Note. 6/1/88 and 6/8/88 and Payroll ending 5/26/88 for the total amount of $1.832.785.34. C3. Approval to authorise the advertising of the "NOtica Inviting Bide" for the Area II Hellman Storn Drain Improvement Project, frog Hunts vista to Soothe= Pacific Railroad to be funded iron Drainage Fund. Account No. 23- 4637 -8763. POLIM FROM AGERDA RESOLUTION ).J. 88 -379 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAIONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PLANb AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "AREA II HELLMAN STORM DRAIN FROM M)NTE V: @TA TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC RA31ROAD ". FUNDED FROM DRAINAGE FOND. IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C4. Approval to change accoint nunber fron ED 325/TDA Fund Account No. 12- 4637 -8605 to Pedestrian Grant$ /Article 3 Account No. 16- 4637 -8717 for the Archibald Avanua SidwalVa. Phase II. C5. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 11997. located on the soutLeast corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street, submitted by Nordic Development. RESOLUTION NJ. 88 -380 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRE@ffiNT ERTENSIL11 AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11997 C6. Approval to execute Improvment Agreement Extension for Tract 13117. located on the east aide of flaxen Avenue, south of Banyan Street, oubmitted by Paragon Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -381 A RESOLUTIONi OF THP .CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY Op RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APFROV= IMPROVEMENT AGRPSMm EITENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 131-17 C7. Approval to execute a contract (CO 88 -080) for consultant services to BSI Consultants. Incorporated, in the mount of $73.120 for production of a Citywide Traffic Control Device Inventory, to be funded from Goa Tax Fund Account No. 09 -4637 -8780. C8. Approval to execute an agreceent (CO 88 -081) for the Inatal:ation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Gilbert D. Wells and Barbara J. Nell" and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Inproveaents at 6357 N. Archibald Avenue, located on the east aide of Archibald Avenue between Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue, for the Archibald Avenue Widening Project. City Council Minutes Joao 15, 1988 Page 3 RESOLUTION No. 88 -382 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCOONGA. CALIFORNLA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND CHDICATION FROM GILSERT D. WILLS AND BARBARA J, WELLS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MEEK TO SIGN ®. Approval to award and execute a Professional Strvicca Agreement (01 88-082) with Land /Plan /Design Group to perform Landscape Inventories, master Beautification Plans for Milliken Avenue Hadian Islands and Parkways: 6th Street Median Islands and Milliken Avenue Underpass Schematic Alternates for a iee not to exceed $45,839 to be paid from the Beautification Pond, Account No. 21- 4647 -8718. An additional 10% contingency allmancn to be established for use under the approval of the City Engineer. CIO. Approval to execute a contract (00 88 -083) for design services relating to the updating of the City's Standard Plane and Development Spacificatione to J. P. Davidson and Associates. Incorporated, fez the mount of $27,075 to be funded frm Development Management Contract Services, Account No. 01- 4638 -6028. Cll. Approval to ward and execute Professional Services Agreement (CD 88 -085) with Golden Coast Environmental Services, Incorporated. Irvine, California, for Preparation of a Citywido street tree inventory and computerized tree managment program in the mount of $85,000 plus a IGZ contingency for a total appropriation of $93,500 to be funded from Beautification Fund Account No. 21- 4647 -8778. PULLED FOR DISCDSSIGN C12. Approval to ward and execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 88 -086) with Meyer and Associates, Laguna Nilia, California, the City Parke Facilities Ratro-Pit Improvement Project, includes athletic oquipmant storage buildings, trash dumpater enclosures, drive approaches, concrete paving, minor grading for drainage, fence repair, minor elope drainage, concrete owstripa, and tree planters, in the mount of $20,500 plus a 10% contingency for a total appropriation of $22,550 to be funded from the Parks Capital Improvement Account No. 01- 4647 -7043. C33. Approval to ward and exacute a Professional Serviced Agreement (OD 88 -084) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ASL Consulting Engineers for the preparation of design plane, contract dpecificationa and engineer's estimate on the Churcb-Hemom Storm Drain within Master Plan Watershad Area VI frm approximately 360 foot north of 19th Street to the Church Street Basin. The not- to-exceed fee of $79.435 plus 10% contingency will be funded from Drainage Fees, Account No. 23- 4637 -8761. C14. Approval to accept improvements. release bonda and file a Notice s Completion for 5010 Hellman Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $3,300 Ciry Council Hinutea a J-- 5. 15, 18 page 4 5 :r ,- RESOLUTION N0. E8-383 V� A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY CUUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO cumNONCA. mlrow.A. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEM8NT8 FOR 5810 HELLMAN AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A ,g NOTICE OF tDtO? MON FOR THE WORR $: C15. Approval to release bonds for Tract 9400, located on the north side of Banyan Street east of Beryl Street. N' N Raleasat Faithful Petformance Bond (Street) $25,000 Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 2,500 if Mo. Approval to release cash deposit for the follwingt y Rill Williams Development corporation $ 628 Subdivision Sign for Tract 13066 M 6 S Residential Development $ 628 Z Subdi Dion Sign for Tract 12772 Lewis Development Cmpany $500 and $ 2,500 r Subdivision Sign and Sales Office for Tract 12364 -1 t Lewis Development Coopaq 8 2,500 Sales Trailer for Tract 9504 C17. Approval to authorize tho levy of an assessment surcharge for the expenses incurred in the collection of assessments in the Alta Loma Chw,el District (84 -2), the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District (821R), the Rancho Cucamonga Drains.gr District (86 -2). PULLED FOR DISCUSSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-384 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOUGA. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZINO THE LEVY OF AN .. ASSESSMENT SUR0LIRCE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE CULLECfION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMMT DISTRICTS CIS. Approval of all 1987 -88 budgetary adjustments for the Central, Capital Projecte, Special Reserve Funds. and Agency Funds. C19. Approval to authorize a correction be made to a Previous action with respect to the accounr number charged for the Lion Street project to the Capital Rusawe Fund, Acecunt No. 25 -4285 -7043. 0 'A City Council Minutes June 15. 1988, Page 5 C20. Approval to one the Rancho Cueemouga Neighborhood Canter an interim location of Eeergancy Operations Center (E.O.C.). POLLED FOR A BA779 PRESENTATION C21. Approval to establish reir r, sent from proceeds of financing in connection With acquisition of 2 —d, design and constmetion of facilities relating to the 99 acre Central Fa. 14ZLED FOR FURTHER DISCUOSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-385 A RESOLUTION OF THE CLTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 07 RANCHO COCAIONGA. CALIFORNIA. PRO71DING TPAT PAYMENTS BE MADE BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND AND THIS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF' FACILITIES RELATING TO THE 99 ACRE CENTRAL PARR PROJECT ARE TO BE MADE IN ANTICIPATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A PLANI3D LEASE PINANCn&; WITH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT 1N8RETO C22. Set public bearing for July 20, 1988 - Approval to Casco" Tract Nos, 12402. 12365. 12672, and 12673 Work Program Areas (Tema Vista Planned Comaunity) from Landscape Maintenance District No, 4, RESOLUTION NO. 88-386 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COGIDNGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DEANNETATION OF WORK PROGRAM AREAS OF TRACT NOS. 12402. 17365. 12672 AND 12673 FROM LANDSCAPE HAINT@UNCE DISTRICT N0. 4 C23. Set public hearing for July 20, 1988 - Approval to Armes Pereal NAP 9504, located at the northeast comer of Base Lice Road, and Haven Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation No. B. RESCLU'CION NO. 88 -387 '- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO _ CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY EN)TNEBR'8 REPORT FOR CATION NO. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. a RIaCLUIION NO. 88 -388 A RES(i,UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAE0I11A, CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXA71ON TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIBTRICT 110. 4 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT! DESIGNATING SAID ANNErATION AS City Council minutes June 15. 1988 Pass 6 „t ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MSTRICr NO. 4 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS IHERETC C24. Sat public hearing for July 20. 1988 - Approval to Annex DR 87 -41. located vest of Utica Avenue. south of Arrm Highway and CDP 87 -42, located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue. to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 21. RESOLUTION N0. 88-389 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITI OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 21 TO LANDSCAPE NAINTBimce DISTRICT N0. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88-390 A RLSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG . CALIFORNIA. MCLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MKINTEHANM DISTRICT N0. 3 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 21 TO LANDSCAPE MAL'NT6NANCS DISTRICT NO. 3 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 025. Sat public hearing for July 20. 1988 - Approval to Anne= DR 87 -41. located vest of Utica Avenue, south of Arrow Highway and CUP 87 -42. located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue. to Street Lighting Yainteoanco District No. 6 as Annexation No, 17. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -391 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO O ri 110NGA. CALIFORNIA. OF FRPLININARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEERIS REPORT FOR ANNEXATION M0. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICI NO S RESOLUTION NO. 88-392 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING NAINTENAHM DISIPICT 110. 63 PURSUANT TO SHE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFBRING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERAID MOTION: Moved by Wright. seconded by Ring to approve the Conant Oalandar with the exception of Iteas C3. MI. C17. C20 and C21. Notion carried unanimously. 5 -0. City Council Minutes June 15,- 1988 Page 7 RRaf1r Discussion of Item C11. Approval to award and execute Professional Sarvicar Agreement (CO 88 -085) with Golden Coast Enviremsntal Services. Incorporated, Irvine, California, for preparation of a City -wide street tree inventor, and computerized tree management program in the mount of $35,000 plus a 10% contingency for a total appropriation of $93,500 to be funded from Saautification fund Account No. 21 -4647 -3778. Councilmmber Wright asked if the $93.500 figure also included maintenance. y She also asked about the other proposal by Fred Roth. Rues Maguire. City Engineer, explained how the tree maintenance program would work. Dave Blevins, Maiutonance Superintendent, stated that Golden Coast is tho only practical company who could do this work; that if Fred Roth had bean awarded this bid, staff would have had to assict his in a big way. Be said that staff did not receive a direct quate from Mr. Roth. Councilmeabor King felt an inventory of this nature vas very important to < City. Councilmmber Buquet felt that it van money veil - spent. Mayor Stout naked if this could be worked into the Mtintenance Districts. Jerry Fulvood, Resource Center Coordinator, said that was a possibility. Mel or Stout felt that this was a vary worthwhile program. Councilmmber Wright asked further quentiono on how the Maintenance System would work. Dave Blovinc. Maintenance Superintendent, vent into more detail ou the tree maintenance program. MOTIONS Moved by Ring, seconded by Stout to approve the item to be paid lion - reimbursmen• funds. Motion carried 3 -2 (Wright /Brown no) . 111RfR Discussion of Item C17. Approval to authorize the levy of an assessment surcharge for the expenses incurred in the collection of eesessmente in the Alta Inca Ctmrel District (84 -2). the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District (821R), the Rancho Cucamonga Drainage District (86 -2). RESOLUTION NO. 88-384 A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCURGE FOR THE MENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICIS sy city Council Minutes June 15, 1988 Page 8 Mayor Stout asked if this bas been levied in the past. Jerry Fullwood. Resource Center Coordinator, stated that it ban bean. Be also gave more information on the Assseaeen. Program, Couneilember Wright asked further questions on the Districts. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquot to approve Resolution 88 -384. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. RRRRRf Discussion of Itm C20. Approval to use the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Canter an interim location of Emergency Operations Canter (E.O.C.) Duren Wassorman. City Manager, asked that tuis item be pulled so that Marti Ringins, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator, could make a verbal presentation on this Marti Higgine, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator, presented her report. MOTION: Moved by Wright, socondad by Brown to approve the we of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Canter as tba interim lo,:etion of the Emergency Operations Center. Notion carried unanimously. 5 -0. RRRl1R Discussion of Item C21. Approval to establish reimbursement item proceeds of financing in connection with acquisition of land, design and construction of facilities relating to the 99 acra Central Park. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -385 A RESOLUTION OF SHE QTY COUNCIL OF TUB CITY OF RANCHO LUCIMONGA. CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING THAT PAYMENTS BE MADE BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH 7HE ACZUInITION OF LAND AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES RELATING TO THE 99 ACRE CENTRAL PARK PROJECT ARE TO BE MADE IN ANTICIPATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A - - PLANNED LEASE FINANCING WITH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND D+RECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, gave a brief report on how this would work. Councilmmber Wright asked if there needs to be a public hearing for a C.O.P. Jim Markman. City Attorney, stated yes. Counciimember Wright vented to make aura that this didn't tie the City to a C. 0. P. s n I City Council Minutes June 15, 1988 Page 9 MOTION: Moved by Stout. seconded by Fang to approve Resolution 88 -385. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. r' y • a a a a a D. CONSENT ORDINANCES City Clerk Authelet read the titles of Consent Ordinance Numbers 35i 356, 3529 353, 354, 357 and 355. Dl. UBVELUPMEMr - A requact to amend the Development District Map from Lw•Nedium L4-8 dwell ng unite per acre) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) attached with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) to the base district for 5 05 acres of land. located on the south side of Base Line Road. vest of Archibald Avenue - APH 208 - 031 -18. 19. ORDINANCE NO. 351 (second tending) AN ORDINANCE OF THE OITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A REgUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP. DIA 87 -05. FROM LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 WELLING UNITE .'SR ACRE) TO HIGH RESIDENTIAL (24-30 WELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ATTACKED WITH CBS SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD) FOR A 5.05 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD. WEST OF ARC 33ALD AVENUE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. AND MARE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 87 -02 - IMURSE DEVELOPMENT - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Monroe Development for the purpose of providing o Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.20.040 of the Development Code, Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment mite to be located on the south aide of Base Line Road, vent of Archibald Avenue - APH 208- 03118, 19. ORDINANCE NO. 356 (second reading) - - AN ORDINANC: OF TAR CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 87 -02 SENIOR CITIZENS' HOUSING" CONCERNING THAT WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. IN SHE QTY OF AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA aND imva51P iu - A request to amana too uevotopment matrlcte nap from Lon- MOdiam Residential (4-8 dwelling unite par acre) to Office Profusaimal for 1.69 acres of land. located on the vest Ride of Archibald Avenue, eout'.i of Baca Line Road - APH 208- 031 -17. 54. 55. 56 and 57. City Council Minutes .Tune 15. 1988 Page 10 ORDINANCE NO. 352 (second reading) ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ° cawmo GA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A R14UEST TO AMEND THE S, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NAP, DDA 87 -06. FROM LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 ENELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL FOR A 1.69 ACRE PARCEL LOOATED ON IRE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. SOUTH OF BASS LINE ROAD. RANCHO COCAMNGA. CALIFORNIA. AND MARE FINDINGS IN SUPIORT THEREOF { • * f f f f D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMSNP AND DIM.OPHRN nT.TT T AVawnwe#I. D7- b.-- u Tzx - A request to emend the Development Districts Nap frm Offi"/Profesaioml (OP) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) for approximately 3.45 acres of land. looted on the soutbweot onraer of Base Line Road and Hellaten Avenue - APN 208 - 202 -13. 14. 0.RDINANCE NO. 353 (ascoad reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAIONGA. CALIFORNIA. AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DIS1TlCr MAP FROM OFFTCB /PROFESSIONAL (OP) TO NEIGHBORHDOD COMMERCIAL (NC) FOR 3.59 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE - APN 203- 202 -13. 14 1 f f 1 1 f D3. ENVIROtOENfAL ASSB&SMENr. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DBVELOpHFjn DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -03 - WBIHIIX PROPERTIES - A development agreement and request to amend the Devalopnent District Me from -OP" (Olfice /Profeaoi000l) to eNL- (Neighborhood Commercial) with 3.58 acres of land locatud at the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 151 -33. ORDINANCE NO. 354 (second reading) - - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAIDNCA. CALIFORNIA. AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL (OP) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) FOR 3.58 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT AND ARCHIBALD AVENGE - APN 202- 151 -33 ORDINANCE NO. 357 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAFDNIA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 87 -03 CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND . f city Council minutes Joan 15. 1988 pa3e 11 t LOMIITA COURT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA" AND AUTHORIZIHLS THE MAYOR TO EMCUTE THE SAM ON BEHALF OF o� THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA * * a * * * D4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMant nnu vnvaa.uc.wn. (PREZONE ) - PULSAR DEVELOPMENT - A roqueat to prezona a portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated arm (for anuarstion purpose@) to Law Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located earth of Highland Avenue. south of Summit Avenue extension, east of Doer (reek utility corridor, and vect of the County/City boundary - APH 225 - 161 -19. 32, 33, 34. 35, 36, 37, 38, 49. 53, 55. and 61. ORDINANCE N0. 355 (earned reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE QTY COUNCIL OP SEE QTY OF RANCHO OUCAMONGA, CALIFOIUIIA. AMENDING (rRB.SONE) THE DEVELOpMENT DISTRICT MAP TO SEE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF LOW R UIDENfIAL TO THE PROPERTIES LOCA72D NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE. SOUTH OF SUMMIT AVgNUS EKTZNSIGN. EAST or THE DAY CREEK UTILITY OORRIDOR. AND WEST OF THE OOUNTY /CITY BOUNDARY - AFN 225-161 -19, 32. 33. 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55. AND 61 MOTIONS Moved by Ring, seconded by Brown to waive full reading of these ordinances. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Couneilmember Wright pulled Ordinance Nunbern 351, 356 and 352 for discussion. She again stated that she felt that the traffic situation frm Base Line into the project would be very dangerous. MOTIONS mowed by King, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinances 351, 356. and 353. Notion carried, 4 -1 (Wright no). MOTIONS Moved by Ping, seconded by Buquot to approwo Ordinance Nunbers 352, 354, 357 and 355. Motion carried unanimously. 5 -0. _ * * * a x a B. ADVERTISED PUBLIC BEARINGS E1. ENVIRONKUUAL ASbbbbnbna ,u.0 a.... ....�..- -..... .__.. -._.._ __ __ -__ RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Various moodmenta to tho Sign Ordinance regarding neon a gee and window signs. Staff report presented by Dan Colman. Senior Planner. Mayor Stout ougg.sted that there ba a joint meeting between the Chamber and the City prior to approving this acv ordinance. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressiag Council wool M city Council Minutes ` June 15, 1988 Page 12 i s Lowell Games, 8772 pivarro Street. Rancho cucamonga, also President of the 'Ry member of Concerto, who stated that he supported the idea of the workshop as suggested by Mayor Stout. There being no further public response. Mayor Stout cloned the public hearing. Mayor Stout suggested that a meeting be scheduled in July, on a Saturday, to discuss this ordinance, and hopefully it could be approved at the second meeting in August. Mayor Stout also suggested that the Chamber of Ccamerce contact the merchants on the proposed ordinance. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, said that staff would try to schedule the meeting during the lest week of July. ORDINANCE NO. 358 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE Op THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMUA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88-01. AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO HOUTTY REGULATIONS FOR NEON MD WINDOW SIGNS AND ADDING PROVISION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY SPONSORED SPECIAL EVENTS MOTION: Mowed by Buquet, seconded by Wright to caatinue the item to Aiguot 17, 1988. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. * * * * * * E2. wnainuccuun - a request vo scene rue :Lane um atemenr or cum uoverai raan trm -odium Residential (8-14 duelling units per acra) to Lou- Hadium Residential (4-8 duelling unite par acre) on approximately 15 acres of land, located north of Highland Avenue, mouth of Lemon Avenue extension, and vent of Doer Creek Channel - APN Portions of 207- 271 -34 and 41, and 201 - 271 -42. Staff report prasonted by Larry Heuderson, Senior Planner. '• Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. Addressing Council was: Gary Andres, Andres Construction Cmpary, representing Acacia Construction Company, who explained why they were requesting the down moving. There being no further response, Mayor Stout closed the public bearing. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -393 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, rALIFORNIM APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 88 -02A, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW- NEDIUM RESIDENTIAL City Council Minutes _ June 15, 1988 Page 13 FOR A.-PROXIMATELY 15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE EXTENSION, AND WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL, RANCHO CNCAMONCA. CALIFORNIA - ANN PORTIONS OF 201 - 271 -34 AND 41 (SEE EXHIBIT "A") AND 201- 271 -42, AND MAPS FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTIONS Moved by Buquet, seconded by Ring to approve Revolution No. 88-393. Motion carried unanimounly. 5 -0. wnanuoiaun - n request to ozone cna uavatopnvnr utatrict Deaignation or Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Lw Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling mite per ae -e) on approximately 15 acres, located at the north aide of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue extausion and vast of Doer Ltaak Channel - APH Portions of 201 - 271 -34 and 41, and 201 - 271 -42. City Clark Authelot read the title of Ordinance 359. ORDINANCE NO. 359 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CNCAMNCA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AM8N04MT 88 -01 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW- MCdDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF LMN AVENUE EXTENSION, AND WEST OF TBE DEER CREEL CHANNEL, RANCHO CICAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, - APN PORTIONS OF 201 - 271 -34 AND 4) (SEE EXHIBIT "A ") AND APIN 201- 271 -42 MOTIONS Moved by Ring, aocondad by Wright to waive fall reading and eat second reading of Ordinance No. 359 for July 6, 1988. Motion =tried unanimously, 5 -0. f a s a a a E3. CONSIDERATION TO VACATE VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR DRIVEWAYS ON THE WEST- - Mayor Stout opened the public bearing. Addressing Council want Clark Levis, 856 Borkaly Street. Ontario, who urged the Council to approve this resolution. Tbare being no further response. Mayor Stout closed the public bearing. Councilmenbor Buquet asked if thin item had been properly noticed. Russ Miguire, rAty Engineer, stated yea. 1 w Y ■ City Council minutes June 15. 1988 Page 14 a •L RESOLUTION NO. 88-394 A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY OOUNCIL 07 IRE CITY OF RANCHO CDCkHONCA. COUNT OF SAN EERHAHDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DBCLARINC ITS INTENTION TO VACATE VETICILAR ACCESS RIGHTS r F FOR TWO DRIVEWAYS ON JASPER STRIST AND AN EMERGENCY ' VEHICLE ACCESS ON LOMITA AVENUE MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Ring to approve Resolution Eo. 88-394. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. seae *s UL ENVIRONHENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODs AMENDROSNT Eg-U4 - ,w,,.no ww•aLavn - nu mae,�.ua r u.a ...uu.... ., w •• - ••••_ ••••• ad tion of Section 17.10.050-0 of the davalopeent Code pertaining to the parking and storage of vehicles on private property in the Residential, Costercial and Industrial Districts. St -ff report presented by Richard Alcorn, Code Warrantor Supervisor. Mayor Stout asked if thin would apply to trailers in the Industrial Specific Plan area. Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Superrieor, stated yea. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no public reponse. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. City ClerN Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 360. ORDINANCE NO. 360 (firet reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 1,177 OF RANCHO CICAMUGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IEVELO7MEWT CODE AMENDMENT 88 -04, AMENDING SUBSECTION 17.08.070 -C AND 17.12.030 -8. AhD ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 17.10.050 -0 TO THE LEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO THE PARKING AND STORAGE OF VEiIOL - ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL, CON6aC1A' /O.M "7 AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS MOTION: Moved by Euquat, seconded by King to waive full reading and set second teadiug of Ordinance No. 360 for July 6 1988 . Notion carried unanimouol,. 5 -0. • a f e a a LAr Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There bait& no response, Mayor Stout closed the •,ublic hearing. ■ ,e City Council Minutes 'a• June 15, 1988 Page 15 RESOLUTION NO. 08 -395 A RESOLUTION or THE CITI 009NCIL OF 'MIR CITY OF RANCHO caCANDNCA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT TYJR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE A23NOAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS 11 M. IN THE PARR AND REC+EATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 85 PD HOTIONt Mowed by Brown, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 88 -395. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquat no). f R a a f A f A� "( Mayor Stout called a roman at 8:45 p.m. City Council reconvened at 9ri0 p.m. 3 with all members of the Council present. a a w a a w s E6A. ENVIRONhIWAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENrHEWY 88-02 C-_ CITY- OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - sa caendmeot to the Lsnd Dea E1®snt for the following parcels vithin the Victoria Community Plan area: from Low -Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Low (2-4 dwelling units par acre) APN 227 - 411 -751 front Medium (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Madium (4-8 dwelling uatts per ' acre) Aft? 227- 091 -9. 26, 49, 501 from Medium (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Medium -high (14-24 dwelling units per acre) AIN 227- 091 -18 through 22, 25. 431 frm Medium (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low- Medium (AO3 dwelling units per acre) APN 227 - 111 -2, 33, 38; mad frm Naighborbood Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 &ailing units per acre) - APN 227- 171 -19. Staff Report presented by Debra Maier. Associate Planner. Mayor Stout asked if the site where the winery is van going to be encouraged as residential development. Debra War. Associate Planner, stated that the vinery, as far as she understood, van going to be desigLated an historical landmark. Councilmember Brown asked about the down zoning at the Laken Project. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that there vas down zoning at the Lakta Project, but felt that they did intend to maintain some high density. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Vito DeVito Francisco. P.O. Bow 591, Ontario, who cis here to talk about the property on Highland Avenue and Rochester A.cnw. He stated that thty did not want to be involved or made a part of the Victoria Planned Community. He wanted to be deleted frm the action taken tonight. Re thought these parcels stould be dealt with as they develop. There bang no furtber public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. A I City Council Minutes June 15, 1988 Page 16 Councilmmber Brown caked what a person would have to do to comply wit the Victoria Planned Community that might not be in another plan. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that there is nothing out cf the ordinary that the Victoria Planned Community has that other developments have. Councilmmber Wright asked about the contents of the Victoria Plan. Brad Buller, City Planner, said it in the ease as the Development 0 Ia. except it is the Victoria Flan. He also stated that master plena are eat ishad to be used an guidelines. Councilmmber King did not feel that someone should have to be made to join a plan if they did not want to. Councilmmber Buquet said he did rot see an urgency to do anything tonight. He felt an appropriate zone charge should occur at a time w%en I is appropriate to change the tom. He also felt that all the parcels where Vista would be an increase in density should be deleted from thin concept. Brad Buller, City Planner, added that the school district's property doom comply with the v'ctoria Plan muditionc. Councilmmber King said he bad no problem in approving this if the City got written okay to do the annexations. RESOLUTION hO. 88-396 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY WUNCI.L OF THE QTY OF RANCHO WCJDNGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CCNERAL PLAN AM2hdMO2NT NO. 88 -O2C AMENDING THE LAND US.°. ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FOR PARCELS WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: FROM LOW - MEDIUM: (4-8 WELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW (2 -4 DWELLINGS UNITS PER ACRE) APN 227 - 411 -751 FROM MEDIUM (8-14 WPLLIAC; UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOR- MEDIUM (4-8 WELLING UNITS PER ACRE) APN 227 - 091 -9, 26. 49. 50N FROM MEDIUM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUN -HIGH (14-24 WELLING "UITS P'SR ACRE) AEN 227- 091 -18 THROUGH 22, 25. 43: FRIA MEDIUM (8-14 WELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LW- MSUiUN (4-8 DUELING UNITS PER ACRE) APN 227 - 111 -1. 33. 381 AND FROM NEIGHBORHOOD C7M1ERCO:AL TO MEDIUM xY.SID &VTIAL (8-14 WELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AFN 227- 171 -19 MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Ring to approve Resolution No. 88 -396. Motion carried 4-1 (Buquat so). P.6B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVEI.OFMMff DISTRICT AOJIDM Nr 88- -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to changc Development Dlstrlet designations as they currently exist to Victoria Planned Community (V.P.C.) for eleven areas City Council Minutes June 15, 1988 Page 17 vithin the Victoria Planned Community - APH 227 -011 -8 thru 111 227- 091 -4. 45. 561 227- 411- 751 227- 091 -9, 26, 49, 501 227- 091 -18 thru 22, 25, 43; 227 - 111 -1. 33, 38; 227- 171 -191 227- 161 -30. 24, 25 and 227- 111 -27, 30 end 227 - 171 -211 227- 211 -7. 26. 391 229-021 -581 227- 211 -3, 30 P.6C. ENVIRONMENTAL AS935SHM AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 88-02 - CITY OF RANCRO - C CAMINGA - An amendment to annex eleven areas into the Victoria Flmned qty-- APH 227 - 011 -8 tbru 111 227 -091 -4, 45, 46; 227- 411 -75; 227- 091 -9, 26, 49. 50; 227 -091 -18 thru 22. 25. 431 227- 111 -1. 33. 38; 227- 171 -19; 227 - 161 -10. 24, 25 and 227 - 111 -27. 30 and 227- 171 -21; 227 - 211 -7, 28, 39 ;229- 021 -58; 227 - 211 -3. 30. City Clerk Authelet read the titles of Ordinsnu Numbers 361 and 362. ORDINANCE NO. 361 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMEN= NO. 88-02, A REQUEST TO CHANCE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS AS THEY CURRENTLY MST. TO VICTORIA PLANNED CONMUNITY (VPC) FOR SEVEN AREAS 917HIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AREA - APH 227 -011 -08 THROUGH 111 227 -091 -04, 45, 56; 427- 411 -75; 227 - 091 -09. 26. 49. 50. 227- 091 -18 THROUGH 22. 25. 43; 227- 111 -01. 33. 38; 227 - 171 -19; 227- 161-10. 24. 251 227- 111 -27. 30; 277- 17a -21; 227- 21, -07. 28. 391 229- 021 -58; AND 227- 211 -03. 30 ORDINANCE NO. 362 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AFMDffi;T 88-02, AN JUMUffi7T TO ANH= ELEVEN (11) AREAS WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY AREA TO EEB VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - APH 227 - 011 -08 TRRCOCH 11; 227- 019 -04, 45. 46; 227- 411 -751 227 - 091 -09, 76, 49, 50; 227- 091 -18 THROUGH 22, 25, 43; 227- 111 -01, 33. 38; - - 227- 171 - 091 -19; 227- 161 -30. 2`. 251 227- 111 -27. 30; 227 - 171 -211 227- 211 -7. 28, 39; 229-021 -58: AND 227- 211 -3. 30 MOTION: Moved by Icing, seconded by Wright to valve full reading of Ordinance Numbers 361 and 362. Notion carried uncnimovsly, 5 -0. MOTTONI Moved by Ring, seconded by Wright to set second reading of Ordinance No. 361 for July 6. 1988 meeting. Motion carried 4-1 (Buguot no). MDTIONI Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to set second reading of Ordinance No. 362 for July 6. 1988 meeting. Motion carri..d 3 -2 (Ring. Euquet no). R R R R R R City Council Minutes June 15. 1988 Page 18 (NOTEt Items E7 and E8 were discussed jointly.) �s Staff report for Items E7 and EB van presented by Nike Olivier. Senior Civil Engineer. Puss Maguire. City Engineer. stated that they are only dealing with one property at this point. because the owners of Parcel No. 202 - 111 -16 have signed. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no public response. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. RESOLUTION 170. 88-397 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 0CAMONPA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING 'THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONTEMN PORTIONS OF CBRTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCOO COW33NGA AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 88-398 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON".,A. CALIFORNIA. ORLERM THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT$ AT 6705 AMSPHIST STREET. APB NO. 202- 111 -06 IN ACCORmxm W7TR THE CALIFORNIA COPES FOR - STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 TRRU 5880 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT 4,CT OF 1191 MOTIONt Moved by Buquet. aceonded by Sing to approve Resolution Numbers 88-397 and 88-398 " corrected. Motion carriad unanimously. 5 -0. a e a a a a E9. ORDERING THE WORE. IN CONNECTION WITEt Staf! report presented by Lauren Wasearman. City Manager. Mayor Ltout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no public response. Mayor Stout closed the public bearing. A. B. L'9 City Council HHuutea June 15. 1988 Page 19 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -399 A RPSCUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 731E CITY OF RANCHO COCM NGA. CALIFORNIA. OHEER= THE WORK IN CONNECTION WIDE ANln=TIOH NO. 29 -0 LANDSCAPE HAINTEANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT 13425 G, RESOLUTION N0. 88-400 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF INR QTY OF RANCHO COCAHONOA. CALIF04N7A. ORDERING THE WORK IN CDMTECTIOH WITH ANNEXATION N0. 47 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND ICCEPTING THE FINAL INGINFER'S REPORT FOR TRACT 13544 RESOLUTION NO. 80-401 5 RESOLUTION OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCO COCAMOW-A, CALIFORNIA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WI7H ANNEXATION Nn. 45 TO STREET LIGHTING HAINTENANM DISTRICT NO. I AND ACCRETING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13644. PARCEL HAP 9504, M 86-32 (LOT 5. TRACT 12176). AND COP 87 -04 D. ANNEXATION W. 20 FOR CUP 87 -04. DR 86-32 (LOT 5. TRACT 12176. (INDOSTRI�pH4ffiRCIALj. -TO LANDSCw.FB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ND. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -402 A RESCUTMN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHDNGA. CALIFORNIA. ORDERING ME WORK IN CONNECTION WI7R ANNEXATION 140. 20 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE PENAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR CUP 87 -04. DR 86-32. (LOT 5. TRACT IT176) E. ANNEXATION NO. 16 FOR CUP 87 -04. DR 86-32 (LOT 5, TRACT 12176). (INDOSTRIAV—oomBRi&=. TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6. L City Council Minutes ' June 15. 1988 Page 20 RESOLUTION NO. 88-403 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCIMDNGA. CALIFORN/y ORDERING THE WORE IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 16 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL MINEER'S REPORT FOR CUP 87 -04, D.4 86 -32 (LOT 5, TRACT 12176) P. A10I=TION NO.- 8 --FOR - PARCEL - RESOLUTION NO. 88-404 A R$iOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUOM MA, CALIPORNIA. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WIT[{ ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND ACCEPTING NAP 9504 NOTIONS Moved by Ring, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution Numbers 88-399 through 88-404. Motion carried unanimously. 5 -0. a a a e a a E10. PROPOSED PISCAL YEAR 1988 -89 BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Staff report by Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vas: Diane Nillims. 7251 Amethyst, Rancho Cucamony, who wanted to thank the City for the $26.000.00 donation to the library in order to keep it open on Sundays. As for as the typewriter i#aue, she felt it In the responsibility of the County and not the Friends of the Library to get this resolved. There being no further public response. Mayor Stoat closed tba public hearing_. ACTION: Final adoption of the budget with appropriate Resolution# will be presented to the City Council at the meeting of June 28. 1988. No itma submitted. a a a e a a F. PUBLIC HEARINGS a a a e a a a M1. I City Council Minutes June 15. 1988 Page 21 C. CHIT MANAGX.IS STAFF REPORTS G1. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION or 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE - AFN 202 -061 =_12. Staff report presented by Arleca Bo , Associate Planner. RESOLUTION NO. 88-405 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CICAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE LORD HOUSE, LOCATED AT 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUChNONCA. A3 A HISTORIC LANDMARK - APH 202 -061 -12 HDTIONs Moved by Brown, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 88 -405. Motion carried unanimously. 5 -0. • • * a a e C2. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 7165 STIHANIA AVENUE - AFN 227- 131 -23. Steff report by Arlene Banks. Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addrosoing Council vas: Robert Flocker, moor of the property located at 7165 Etivanda Avenue, stated he felt that since the house was in the middle of the property. that it could not be developed very easily. He felt that it should be preserved, but did not rant the house loft in the middle of the property. He suggested that it be moved across the street to another location. Jim Frost. City Treasurer. acid he felt the boom should stay where it is. Councilmember Ring asked if the City had tba right to tell someone that they want to mete their property an historic landmark. Alice Flocker, owner of the property located at 7165 Etivanda Avenue, felt that as property owner, they should have some my in what in going to happen with the property. She did not feel that it should be made "an- historic landmark. Jim Markman. City Attorney. stated that he would like to review the Historic Landmark Ordinance, since there was coma objection to this. before any decisiou in made. He will report back to the Council at the next meeting. Coueilmember Brown suggested that the Historic preservation Conmieaion or the Planning staff establish a list of the moot significant sites to be designated am historic landmarka. Brad Buller. City Planners said this is what basically ham been done. Mayor Stout stated that be would like to see parcel diagrams and store incentive in making the siteu Historic Landmarks. city Council minutes June 15, 1988 Page 22 There being no further public response. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. RESOLUTION N0. 88-406 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 'F 5d' '-I OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, HOUSE. iAri -tr At 7165 ETIWAHDA AVENUE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Ring to continue 'his item to July 6. 1988. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. (Refer r Section J for more information.) G3. HISTORIC POINT OF INTERE ST OESICNATION OF THE SEDGE BOG AT DAY CANYON - APH 225 - 051 -15. 16. Staft report presented by Arlene Backs. Aesociate Plansor. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Jim Delores, of Chaffey College, rho felt that this was vorthvile to save. There being no further public response. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. RESCLUTION NO. 88-407 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ODONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORFIA, APPROVING ''E SEDGE BOG ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE LOCATED AT DAY CANYON, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AS A POINT 02 HISTORIC INTEREST MOTION: Moved by Buquat, aeconded by Wright to approve Revolution No. 88 -407. Motion carried unanimously. 5 -0. a R f R f# G4. HISTORIC POINT OF IM MST DESIGNATION OF THE SCHOWALTER ROCC PILE. Staff report bF Arlene eaM. As.oc F.Fe Planner. RESCLUTION NO. 88-408 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMwA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST eJs TO DESIGNATE SRS SITE OF THB SCHOWALTER ROCK PILE LOCATED BETWEEN VISTA GROVE AND WILSON. 6.0 FEET EAST OF HERMOSA. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AS POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST aJe MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brovu to approve Revolution No, 88 -408. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. # R a R f f i City Council Hinuten June 15. 1988 Page 23 G5. RAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD- D8TSR1Qt11TI0N OF 17@ DRIVEWAY REALIGNMENT FOR COP 88-12 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENY OONFANI - A statI request for ` City Council direction concernin the real E gament of a driveway onto Haver. �u Avenue from the Torre Vista Town Center Sb.7pping Canter, located between ) Foothill Bouleveru and Town Canter Drive. AP7 1077 - 421 -05. staff report presented by Paul Fougnau. Senior Civil Engineer. i Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. Addresainf, Council vast Ralph DeNarco, of the Lewis Company. stated that they would Battle for the band to the north at 10 degrees with a 15 foot off -met and a preatat straight drive, wd target about the median. There being no further pcblic response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. ! Councilmember Buquet stated that be would be against the median break and any cbengas to the drive that goes any further north than what is already approved. He stated that he didn't have any problem with going to the south, but to the north be did have a problem with that. i, Mayor Stout stated that be also agreed. ACTIONt Resolution to coma back at nest meeting with the drive to be no furtber north than what is already approved. } a a } a a H. COUNCIL BUSINESS No items submitted. } a a } s a I. IEERTMCATION OF ITEMS FOR IUMT laarrINC I1. Couacilmember Ring suggested that the City consider having a celebrity u Grand Marshal for the Founder's Day Parade in order to increase the attendance. " Lauren Wasserman. City Manager, stated that he vould investigate thin ponniblity. a } } a } } J. COWAUNDCATIONS FROM TIM PUBLIC At this point of 'be meeting, Mr. Flanker, who is tLe owner of the property of 7165 Etivanda Avarua (refer back to Item G2), asked if thin itam could be changed to come back at the August 3, 1988 meeting. Council concurred with this request. s e a} It a g, C • r ., city Council Ninuca$ Jose 15. 1988 A Page 24 Z.- - ADJOUMMM MTSONI Noved by King, seconded by Wright to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 11126 p.m. to the Jose 28. 1988 Budget Meeting. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Adams Deputy City Clerk .d M Pew L 'n 1 June 28, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned mating of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Tuesday, June 28, 1988, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Hasa Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting vas called to order at 6103 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Couacilmemberst Deborah N. Brova, Charles J. Buquet II (arrived for Executive Session at 6130 p.n.), Jeffre7 Ring, Panel, J. Wright (arrived at 6:05 p.m.), and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren N. Wasserman; RDA Analyst, Leann Paunt., City Engineer, Russell Magrire; City Planner, Brad Buller; Administrative Services Director, James Hart; Comrmity Services Director, Joseph Schultz; Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau( Senior Administrative Assistant, Nark R. Lorimer; Administrative Intern, Diane O'Hull and Deputy City Clerk, Debbie Adam. e • i * s a B. CONSENT CALENDAR 51. Approval of contract for library services with the County of San Borcardino for fiscal year IS87 -88. B2. Approval to authorize the continuation of the annual loan from the City to the Redevelopment Agency. B3. Approval of amendment to Reimbursement Agrtcmnt established betveen the Redevelopment Agency and the City regarding neighborhood conservation program. 84. Approval to appoint Jim Hart to serve as repreaeatative on the Board of Directors of California Municipal Insurance Authority. City Council minutes .Y`. June 26, 1988 _ Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPOINT A DRLECATS TO THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MEMBER ENTITIES OF THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY BS. Approval to confirm the action of the City Council hearing of Jane 13, 1988, regarding a median island break and a request for a driveway resl)gnmant along Haven Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard for CUP 88 -12 -Levis Devo topment Compnoy. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -410 A RESOLUTION OF TEX CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING NO MEDIAN ISLAMD BREAK AND DENYING THE REQUEST FOR THE DRIVEWAY HEALIGHMSUr ALONG MAVEN AVEHM FOR CUP 88 -12 LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST OOHMER OF FOMILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENU3 END MATING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 86. Approval to adopt fiscal year 1988/89 budgetl Article RIIB appropriations limit; 1988/89 salary schedule. RESOLUTION N0. 88-411 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP Tim CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING INS CITY'S BUDGET (GAS TAE, AND OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE FUNDS, AND ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 RESOLUTION NO. 88-412 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE IIIS OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE _ CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -413 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF IRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 07 -327A AND ADJUSTING SALARY RANGES AND BENEFITS FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO.VCA t, City Council Minutes June 28, 1488 Page 3 r ' MOTIONS Moved by Brown, seconded by King to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Buquet and Wright absent). a eerier C. CITY McM&CKR'S STAPP RHPOKTS Cl. report a; (Councilmember Wright arrived at this point in the .eating at 6103 p.m.). r Couecilmember King wskad what Mr. Qoasalvas weld do if he had several cities that disagreed on an issuej and how would he represent the City of Rancho Cucamanga on this type of an issue. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, stated this would have to be coordinated with all of the cities involved. Jim Prose, City Treasurer, addressed the Council, stating that be was in favor of this agreement with Jot Gonsalves. Councilmevber Brown asked if Ms. Gonsalves would be able to give an opinion on certain bills •faile in Sacramento on beha:f of the City. Lnur:'a Wsssarrun, City Manger, stated yes. Councibmember grow asked if Mr. Cossalvca would go to Sacramento and speak n behalf of the City. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, stated yes. Councilaerber Wright asked if it wos Id be Joe Gonsalves, himself, rr would someone else be the person to represent the City. Laurin Wasserman, City Manager, stated we would have Joe Cassalves and his son, Anthony, represent, us and added that he did feel very comfortable with big son doing this. Mayor Stout asked if this company could also represent a redevelopment agency. Lauren Wasserman, C.ty Manager, stated he would have to check into this. Councilme.ber Wright asked what other cities war, using these advocates. City Council minute i ' Jane 26, 1988 Page 4 Lauren Wasserman, City :!anger, stated Victorville, big Beer Lek^- Calm Springs and other cities. MOTIONS Moved by Xing,, seconded by Brown to approve the egreemevt. Councilmember Wright felt as a Citizen it was not necessary, but as a councilmember, it should be done to help the City of Rancho Cucamonga. dayor Stout added that he did not bave any problem with the concept, but felt th¢t it should be shared with the Redevelopment Agency. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 14right no, Buquet absent). # # A A # # D. COMRO)RICLTIM FROM THE PUBLIC There were no communications from the public A # A f # # R. ADJODIIACMf MOTIONS Moved by Ring, seconded by Stout to adjourn. Notion carried unanimously 4 -0-1 (Buquet absent). Hosting adjourned at 6121 p:m. to Bxen.utive Session pursuant to California government code section 54956.8 to consider the sale, lease, purchase or exchange of property identified as Base Line 'and Rochester, Milliken and Arrow, Banyan sad Milliken. Approveds �.n Respectfully submitteJ, Debbie Adams Deputy City Clark 1. w nl, C; v`lrvrt7 7 -27 -08 LIST OF WARRANT] PAYEE x" 656 TARGET FPECIALTT PRODUCTS !! 1707 MRS. ADAMS u 101 CALIFORNIA STATE .�_ 3617 MR. OR MRS. WILSON 214 SAN BERN CO SOLID NASTE MGMENT 667 VISA Cs 514 A S L CONSULTING ENGINEERS - 775 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY 1644 DEJAVU NA16 L NAILS •� 1686 EMPIRE CAMERA v • 993 NACIENOA LANDSCAPE INC. 495 HYDRO -SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC 842 PJUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 759 JAMES SCH90EDER 1829 CARLOS SILVA 617 VISA 634 I C M A 744 GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS 70 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER 56 CALIFORNIA STATE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 1 ITEM OESCR WARRO NARR.AMT. •P CNECKO OVERLAP CK DATE 4/17 -GALL HITCH $01 SPRAYER 233814 CHECK GATED 612f 2 - 24668 88 - OVERPAYMENT 24669• i.lf CHECK OA40 746TO - 24704 . 6/39- VEHICLE CODE BOOKS 24735• -66.11 24706 - REFUND CLASS 07165 25169 75110• -JO.!S TICKET 00370569 26171 - 25293 26294• -51.00 25795 - 26770 VISA ACCI 04620 -0065- L UTMER ITEMS 25)71• 2,035.49 25172 26333 SERVICE FgSN 7123 1N FL• !/15/66 25374 26115• - 7,115.70 25376 - 26349 REF DMV 075101 25150. - 2,096.62 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 01074616/ 75776• 25377 - 2l 707 '173.20 CANON 20377 - 169.55 PROGRESS ESTIMATES 08 25369 - 25400 26401• - 91,347.46 INSTALLATION L OTHER I25402 - 25409 TENS 25410• - 688.00 26411 - 25437 VARICUS PARTS C OTHER ITEMS 21478• - 535.66 25419 - 25476 GAL OUP ON JUNE BILL - 111 N. GAME 254774 -71.91 25475 2S4T9 25480- REFUND CLASS 09014, R L OTHER ITENS 25481• - 100.00 _ VISA ACCT 64520 -0038- C OTHER ITEMS 25511 409.89 DEFERRED COIP 1/21/58 25512• 447.46 DIFFERED COMP 7/21/58 GOLF TOURNAMENT 255/4 4. 4,40.00 7551 90.D3 USER USE FUEL TAM 111/87 - 6110188 265160 3,721.13 25517 t i 1 1 -21 -68 LIST OF VAARANTS PAYEE III 2 A -AABLE LOCK C KEY DUPLI lass EDITH ADAMSON REF 1890 ALLIANCE PARTNERS DEPOf 1656 ALLIEC INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT DVERP 11 ALTA :IRE EDUIPPENT CO. DRY 92a ANFAITFCH DELIV 990 APPLE COMPUTER INC. LASE 26 ASS OCIAIEO ENGINEER, RIGHT 402 AUTO RESTORATORS WINDS 1657 ANDREW BARMAKIAN - KIND RANCH DEPOSE 1107 EDYTHE BARNETT( D ALLO 11x1 BARTON OEVELOPPENT CO. DCOOSI 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE KARCWARE WASHER 1861 KEVIN BATTLE DEPOSE 1858 DON BANTER REFUND 47 BELL C HOWELL 1 SPA 1060 MR. GRIFFITH $RENT RE IMBU 1859 PAUL M. BREWSTER EOUCAT 1203 BURKE C ASSOCIATES, INC. LOTUS 1697 C C A N INNOVATION GROUP ANNUAL 1692 C T K INC. DEPOSI 846 CALIFORNIA STATE 22 -04- 69 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE PAINT 69 CNAFFEY JOINT UNION NIGH SCHOOL PHONE 1864 CINDY CHANCE REFUND 489 CHEVRON U S A INC. ACCT 0 950 CHATS BUILOIN6 PRODUCTS, INC. SEC L 1865 CITY AND STATE 26 ISS 914 CLAREMONT CAMERA RECORD 949 KAREN CLARK INSTRU 752 COCHRAN C NICHOLS. INC. ENGSNE 1963 COLAVIN DAY CREEK OVERPA 1047 COMMENIIY OEVELOPPENT SVCS, INC. SLOG 1 1076 COMPUIERLANO NR TON 862 COPY LINE CORP. RENTAL 87 CUCAMONGA PRINTING GREY P 158 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE LABOR 1644 OEJAVU HAIR C NAILS OVERPA LOT DETCO MAKE B 619 DICKIES SIANOARO IKOUST61AL UNIFG 1204 DINEEN TRUCKING INC GUMP F FANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 2 Y DISCO NARKS WARR.AHT. CATE KEY 25516 106.00 REFUND CLASS 09960 AEC. 055111 26519 20.00 !I REFUND, RE EMIT 02588 25520 1,000.00 AYMENT OF BUS LTC. 012542 25521 1.81 CHIN EXTINGUISHER 25522 45.00 ERY /REMOVAL FOR A 6620 25523 169.74 PNNITER It TONER C OTHER ITEMS 26524 195.66 OF NAY PLAN DESIGN C DRAFTING 26525 4,202.00 NIELO C OTHER ITF.PS 25526 626.74 7 REFUND OF PCRMIT 1997 25521 1,000.00 HONG C N GRAGG C OTHER ITEMS 25526 6,640.08 T REFUND ON PERMIT 42844 26529 1,000.00 S - CREDIT RETU C OTHER STEPS 25530 19.13 T REFUND OF PERMIT 02634 25531 1,000.00 9S /ALIVE RIC $2726 29532 16.00 CE7ASTER R/P SERVICE 2553) 370.00 RSEMENT FOR TOWING ERROR 259)4 93 00 ZONAL REIMBURSEMENT 26535 66.10 1 -2 -3 INTERFACE MOGULS 25536 195.00 PEPBERSHIP 9/1156- 6/31/89 25537 3,500.00 T REFUND ON PERMIT 03079 20536 250.00 00 DIV 4 ENV H[N:IM CODE UPDA 29539 12.00 SUPER VEHICLES C 2THER IIEPS 25940 620.78 LINE TO POOL /SUMMER SHIN PROD 25541 65.00 CUSS 01121, REC $5361/62 25542 24.00 7920150025 25543 58.66 DCKSEI. Of ADBOLT, DUPNY LEVER 25544 445.20 USE 25545 IS.03 DATA BACK 2 25546 255.55 CTOR 459, CLASS 7050/30/32131 20547 ._ 399.70 REBUlLD C OTHER ITEMS 29546 11,288.45 YMENT OF PLAN CHECK FEES 25549 22.50 NSPCCTOR SERVICES FUN JUNE as 25550 960.00 ENS FOR APPLE LASER 25661 209 ee COPIER 25552 219.69 A RCHMENT C OTHER ITEMS 25553 169.97 C OTHER ITEFS 25554 517.25 YMENT OF BUS LIC 010746 25SS6 138.01 ADDIS 26556 93.2a Fd5 C TONE LS 25557 294.55 EES C GTHiR ITEMS 25558 852.00 J R m 7 -27 -68 LIST OA VARRANTS PAYEE 1891 OYWFIC EXCURSIONS 521 EASTMAN, l%C 459 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE 173 BILL ESPINOZA LIRE SERVICE 124 FENCE CRAFT PC UPLAND, INC. 331 AtR $T INTFPSTAIE, BAN, TRUSTEE 476 JAY FIT I GERALO 116 FONTANA PAVING, INC. 1929 CONNIE FORTUNA 137 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 1036 STEVE GILLILAND 1679 GLENFEO DEVELOPMENT 1195 GOFWA TEXTRON 1866 GRAND TERRACE PHOTO 1023 DON GREEK C ASSOCIATES 1700 GREGG ELECTRIC 1867 DON HAMILTON 958 HARII HtCGIMS 161 S.M. HOYT IUMBEA CO. NONE CENTER 493 HYDRO -SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC 1677 IDEAS UNLIMITED 912 INDOOR CONFOR' CUNTROL, INC. 1869 J C J MASONRY 1868 OOWLC JACOBS 612 C N JAESCHKE, INC 115 JOBS AVAILABLE 18TO JASMINE FANG 1706 KELLY PAPER 1871 KIMGOON HALL W JEHOVAH$ WITNESS 1873 KNOX 1895 HAROLD KRIS71ANSDM 1612 EARLE RRUGGEL 193 LAIRD CCNSTRUCTIDM CO 195 LANCE SOLL C LUMONARD 367 LEAGUE OF CALI; CITIES 197 LEAGUE Of CALIFORNIA CITIES 1674 CATHERINE LCOGERWOOD 1881 LEROY NICKS 1667 LINPRO CALIFORN :A INC. 200 LOS ANGELES TIMES 1666 LOTUS SUBiCRIPTION DEPT. D RANCHO WCAPONGA PAGE 3 SEEM DESCR WARR6 WARR.AME. DEPOSIT - IOUR BUS FOR CANDIDATES 25551 50.03 PENS POST IT PAD. ER C OTHER ITEMS 25560 2.013.75 AFC ENFD MANAGER 25561 681.94 TIRE REPAIR C OTHER ITEMS 25562 50.60 6' TENSION BARS C OTHER ITEFS 25563 71.40 NCCT 8X19477 -1 JULY PAYMENT 25564 2,621.97 BALANCE PC PMNT FOR DJ ON T /30/BB 25545 15.00 TICKET 13491 C OTHER ITEFS 25566 171.72 REFUND CLASS 69014, RFC 65556) 21567 20.00 BILLING FOR a23-?T22 C OTHER ITEMS 25569 1,251 36 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 75569 IOS.41 DEPOSIT REFUND ON PERMITS 2119/2892 25570 1,200.00 INSTALLATION 25571 68&.07 PRINTS FROM SLIDES 25572 95.00 UPOATE HYDROLOGY C AE C OTHER ITEFS 25573 9,19& 50 DEPOSIT REFUND ON PERMIT 43105 25574 2,000.00 FEIMBIIR - QUAL -FIEU FPPL CCRT EAAM 2B575 40.00 DISASTER SVGS IN IKE 90•S SEMINAR 25516 17.00 WATER CONN. ADAPTER C OTHER ITEFS 25577 120.91 VALCON CK 1 LYE, PVC $CH. NOZZLE, 25978 209.&& 1 YEAR SU6.ZRIPTION 25519 117.03 CHANGED FILTERS ON 17 A/C UNITS 25560 240.00 OVERPAYAENT Of BUS. LIC. 48010 25561 46.40 REFUND CLASS 87121, REC 665371 25502 12.02 BACKLAPPING CMFSUND, C OTHER ITEMS M83 1,420.75 AD FOR AMINO SUPER C PROGRAPHER 26584 79.80 REFUND CLASS 61122. SEC 856054 25585 12.00 2 CASES OF PAPER FDA ^SILVER FOK" 25566 84.27 DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 82747 25567 4,650.00 OR /PIN PUNCH 47 -5132" C 3/1611 TIP 2558& 6.26 TUlf104 REIMBURSEMENT- PUBLIC WORLS 25589 50.:3 DEPOSIT REFUNO PEkl IT 3114 25590 250.00 R'MOVE /REPLACE CURB, C OTHER tTEPS 25591 12.510.00 SECOND INTERIM CONTAC OTHER ITEMS 25592 E,947.00 CPNFENENCE C OTHER ITEMS 25593 1.495.00 REGISTRATIO14 ON RETRE C OTHER ITEMS 21694 $84.88 OLFUND 55/ALIVE HKC 82116 25595 B.CO MILEAGE TO AQUATICS PROGRAM 25596 7 42 OVERPW PLAN CK 03TIO ON ENO FEES 25597 25.46 ACCT 069606C5G1S - FROM 6127 - 8/22 25598 22.20 3 FR SUBSCRIPT IO LOTUS - J. HARRIS 25599 40.00 F is M 4 a 7 -27 -68 LIST OF WARRANIS A"CHO CUCAMONGA PACE 4 PAYEE /TEH OESCR MARY MAPP.APT. 1676 LAURA MANNING REFUND CLASS 9031/32, REC 5,60119 25600 40.00 76 HARKMAM ANCZYNSRI CtAIHANTI LEONORA RIV C OTHER ITEMS 25601 15,105.00 1677 CARLA FC 004ILL REFUND CLASS *9410, REC 4$6050 23502 70.00 26 NC KAUGHAN, ROBERT , P.E PLAN CHECK FOR 6/1287 TO 6110/61 25602 120.00 1668 MICHAEL'S PHOTO FRAMES 25601 80.36 121) IOOERN IRAIGAIIOd TAAIISFEP, GOOF PLUGS C OTHER 1IEMS 25605 112. -4 1676 PAT HOORE REFUND CUSS 09033174 AEC 51441/42 25606 40.00 642 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL TWO REPAIR PJLIY GASKET CASE, 0 C OTHER ITEMS 2E607 407.10 1141 CHEARICE NULLCFAV COMPUIEF IMTLRN 26606 370.00 1162 N 8 S / LOWRY COtV FACILITIES GIST 456.1 25609 136.71 lae4 N R P A PACIFIC AEGICN OFFICE 4 REGIST TO at PACIF SO /MIST MA TNT 25610 1,900.00 1206 NAT'L BUSINESSWOMEN'S LEADERSHIP PtGISTRFT:ON FDA P. PACHON 6 /lS /68 25611 $9.00 1678 NATIONAL INF09PATIPN DATA CENTER 2 VOLUME SET, NA 7L SIP CCOE C P.O. 25612 32.95 1680 SETSUKO HICOLOPOULDS REFUND CLASS 99930, REC .56243 25613 20.00 1679 OCMRLO NORRIS REFUND CLASS 47700, REC 455356/67 25614 24.00 120$ 0 A S FLEET SPECIALISTS DUPLICATE KEY MACHINE C OT41A ITEMS 25615 1,79C.16 61 ON -CALL PAGING SERVICES C OTHER ITEMS 25616 1,415.60 1882 THE ONE HOUR PHOTO COPY SLIKES 25617 24.12 911 ONIAPIO INDUSTRIAL rEb. CLINIC NIKE NOMADS C O1MEM ITEMS 25616 1,.41.00 235 OWEN ELECTRIC SVC CALL TO CK SPRINK C OTHER ITEMS 25619 936.00 1863 AUORiY OMENS REFUND CLASS 07120, REC 055421 25620 12.00 54)9 PACIFIC COMMERLIAL 9POKERAGE AUGUST R.NTAL 25621 75.00 336 PACIFIC ECUIP. IRRIGATION INC. CHAIN, CONN LINK 25622 16.54 229 PACIFIC PRODUCTS, INC 0 PING GRISWOLD C OTHER 17EK5 25623 466.24 1t7 PADGETI /THOMPSGN REGISTRATION - TAKE CHARGE AS'IST 25624 12$.00 1665 AL PAL417O REFUND CLASS 67300, REC. 0562361217 25625 6 00 706 PARK AVENUE OEPOSITIDN SERVICE CLAIM: VICTOF /WILMA SARIGN 041T KS 25626 216 2S seas PATSCNECK OEVELOPRENT CEPOSIT REFUND PERFIT 62650 25627 1,000.00 1667 EARLINE PAULS04 REFUND CLASS 09532. AEC. 456027 25628 20.00 1101 A.F. PAULUS INC. DEPOSIT PEFUNO ON PE EMIT 03118 25629 POD.00 311 PICONE PLUhAIKG COPPORATIGM REPAIR MAIN WATER SUPPLY 25610 223.39 1869 PREFEARED SYSTEMS _ OVERPAYMENT OF OUR LIC. 010215 25631 10.80 1200 PREMISYS, INC. KEY SERVICE LA60R 25632 ash 91 1586 PRENTICE HALL 1 YP TUBSC Pi PTION BI- MEEKLY 26631 115.61 65 PRUDENTIAL OVLPALL SUPPLY MAT 46 STARBURST C OTHER ITEMS 24639 69.98 1669 SUSAN E. RAMIREZ TULTtDr. C BOOK R1irSURSEMENT 26639 54.95 TO RANCHU CUCAMONGA CHAMBER JULY PAYMENT 11636 11 000.00 1891 RANCHO OEVELOPERS DEPOSIT REFUND ON PERMIT 43131 25637 250.00 233 RAPID CA:A, INC PURCHASE ORDER 01504, C OTHER ITEMS 25633 1,515.06 1676 Cl TT OF REDONDO BEACH CCAC STATE IEG:SLATIVE CONN KID 25639 15.00 1000 A.H. REITER DEVELOP /ENT CO. AUGUST RENT 2564U 22,020.00 M 4 a 'r 7 -27 -88 LIST OF WARRANTS PAYEE 112 RITZ CAKE M CENTERS 276 RIVERS ICE BLUEPRINT 1103 LYLE ROBERT N RUSSELL 1592 SAN BERM CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST, t 1105 SEAL FURNITURE C SYSTEMS INC. 1612 SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL 1673 SECUDIA PACIFIC SYSTEMS CORP. 1704 GLENN IHEERAN 363 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRIC 622 KAREN SILMANEK 1819 CARLOS SILVA 217 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON E0. 311 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 317 SRUTMERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOISON CO. 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 3:3 SOUTHERN CALIFO"IA CO. 719 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS EDISON 122 SPARXLETTS ?SO SPECIALTY TYPEWGITER SERVICE 323 STANDARD BRANDS PAINT 1611 JANEll STEVENSON 1210 SVMXIST GRAPHICS C PRlh71HG �J \` 1602 THE SNIX SHOP 683 TEDDY TIPS, INC. 592 LATRY TISDALE 223 JOE TORREZ 1031 IROXEII 1675 ESTHER TURNER 350 U. S POSTIASTER 489 CITY OF UPLAND UPLAND 1616 VAN 7ECM SAF17YLINI 667 VISA 1661 LIEN VO 652 JOHN CARL WARNECKE C ASSOCIATES 578 CARL WARREN C CO 213 MAXIE, 6LEEN -LINE ARP 756 hELOING INDDf TRIAL L 700E SUPPI 1152 NEST EMD TMCI . ...r- ., ..- RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 5 -ITEM DESCR MARRA MRR ANT •-_••_•-_•----•--------------------------------- PHOTOFINISHING OTHER ITEMS 25641 646.45 REIMBURSE ENINTS, SET C DINER ITEFS 25642 REIMBURSEMENT REFUND FOR URBAN FORESTRY CL 2664) 69.17 OC POf li REFUND ON PERMIT &)113 15644 90.00 FINAL PNNi - RED Mlll BA$1N 250.03 PLAN C DESIGN 2!645 134,263.34 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 25646 934,92 CITT NDMINATIOM PAPER - ENGLISH 25641 105.00 DEPOSIT REFUND ON PERMIT 43164 25648 9.97 SET LIGHT STANDARD AT WELL STAT 46 25649 6!0 250.00 REIMBURSE FOR ACCT CIASS C 80065 20651 1,918.00 CERTIFICATION EXAM FOR RfMAS INSP. 25652 93.66 6057 CARNELIAN C OT MER ITEFS 25653 BO.OD 9370 ROW -RAVE 201 C OTHER I1EKf 25654 8,676.55 34 ARROW-RAVEN TGl C OTHER ITEMS 256!! 1,371.46 74 NELIMAN -4TH SPR C OTHER ITEMS 29656 59.607.79 t OTHER 112ELIGHTBBILLINE 9330 BASELINE 10209 256!8 650.76 9791 ARROW AT 62.00 35659 9320 BASELINE RIG UNI C OTHER ITEMS 25660 182.77 CONTRACT SVC, WBEELWRITERS, ETC. 356.92 25661 MASKING TAPE, PAVER B C OTHER ITEMS 25661 888.00 FEFUBD CLASS 49433, AEC 654201 26663 112.28 O""OPIENT CODE MANUALS 25665 20.00 MASK 983.73 25663 509 DEP. FOR BUTIDHS -A FO RIB W{. 25665 46.50 SUMMER lMf TFUC LOP 430, CLASS 7190 2!667 2,162.50 CONTRACT SERVICES C MILEAGE 25668 500.00 DVIRRFAD PROJECTOR PORTABLE /TRIPLET 25669 1,17).74 PEIM6UASE /PMOTJ DEVELOPING - GRAPEV 25670 421.52 POSTAGE FOR FALL 86 GRAPEVINE 25671 3,000. 0 111 N GROVE A`R. BALANCE DUE 25672 BORING JIG RE47AL 25673 71.94 SAFITYLINE LITE VEST, MEO L (FO 25675 15.96 ACCT 44820 -0058 -8140- CDC L III 's 25674 98.56 REFUND CLASS 47)00, RFC X55748 25675 1,418.44 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 1455 6/]0/86 25677 12.00 MWEL ALEJANDRO SANE C OTHER ITEMS 2!678 421.27 SOFT PLUS TISSUE C OTHER ITEFS 2$679 611.17 SOLO, CUTTER BIAGES C OTHER ITEMS 2!680 667.96 SE NO •A- NiD- TO•EAMF PROGRAM 75681 238.97 1,460.09 t 09 I AT T-27-66 LIST OF WAKANIS RANCHO CUCANGRGA PAGE 6 PAYEE ttEk CESCA WARRO WAAR.AhT. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 94 O.F. UDLFINBARGLA. INC. TOP SOIL 35682 190.00 $99 WOOLWORTH-HGOLCO WATER WAND 25683 11.6& 509 XEROX CORPORATION FULL SVC MAINE ON U0 C OTHER ITEMS 2 371 0 DEPOSIT REFUND ON PERMIT $]lit 2161 1,092.36 : 5 250.00 27 JON YOUNG 56 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE VARIOUS MEDICAL /FIRST AID SUPPLIES 25686 252.76 TOW CHECKS 273026.60 f l = �.1 e' 1 7 -10 -08 1157 Of WARRANTS �pV' RMCKO CUCMONGA PAGE 1 PAYEE ITEM DESCR 4ARR4 4ARR.0% . ---- --- -- ---------------- - - - - -- as 714 GREAT WESTIRH SAVINGS CK DATED 6/10 - •OECHECONP OVERLAP ' 1155 LC.X.1, pit RFME NT CORPORATION CA DATE 6/10 - OEFF WNP FOR C:3 /86 GNP 24716• 14346A 7 522 NATIONAL GRAPHIC SUPPLY INDS) 131? CK DATED 6/29/66 - pN070 TAPE /BOARD - 24413 24616• 426.16`7 1636 MR. OR MRS. WALKER 34817 REFUND C16f5 67165 - 25160 76.97 u' 76161• -20.25 LT" 165) 2552 DEEP CFEEX CAR WASH CALIFORNIA STATIDNARS '5162 REMOVE SPRAY ON VENICLF - 1RXfA - 26326 25327- 100.00 LS: 1654 TELE QUESTIONS C ANSWERS THREE RING BINDERS ANNUAL RE TA 3NER FOR PNONF 253264 69.4b 632 RONDA SULIIVAN ANA17515 PE T7Y CASH - TpAVEL /M C OTHER ITEMS 25329• 360.00 Y,: 25330• 433 16 79731 Y 10 1932 A C R TIRE SERVICE A A R F /55 RC SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 25)32 26333 S' 1130 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING A RS S L CONSULTING ENGINEE 36 $A CITIZENS 25331 31637 63 2CO.00 E 1901 AARON BROTHERS ART MARTS SERVICE FROM 3- THROUGH GOlO 8 25335 3.115.50 1095 STEVEN ALIEN 1/2 % 112CON1 FRAMES CONTRACT SERVICES - 20 69.59 1617 ALPHA BETA HAS NATF AMEL04S 25337 430.40 990 519 AP RTIE COMPUTER. ]N C. TER, INC. ART AFADER MAC IS ROD W /EXTND KYBRWHAR D DISK/ 25338 3S))q 30.00 1,911.20 " \ 1 1116 1E83 ASL NPAOON RIES AUSTI 10 MRS SOFT BALI SUMMER INSTRUCTOR 410, CLASS 7603 2530 57U ' 60.00 " v 3B) -FOUST AUSTIN-f OUST ASSOL IAIEf. INC TWO ROLL DISPENSER [ OTHER I7ENS SERVICES 25342 262 15 101 13 AUTO BASELINE ORATORS AL S BASELINE TRUE RIGHT (TENS 25343 25341 47 VALVE HARDWARE of C HOWELL WOOD SCREW CAST[ R /CL07HE SLIME 25345 5 268.65 266.60 16.76 ; $55 ING BENEFIFID RENEWAL SERVICE AGREE C OTHER ITEM SUMMER INSTRUCTOR 472501 CLASS 25316 1.397.00 Isis VICTORIA VICTORIA I. BEST 7250 REFUND CLASS 9331 ICM21SiINE) 25347 270.17 253 313 BILL C WAG'S INC BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY TOWING SERVICE 25318 25349 10.00 65.00 B77 BDPAFR ELATE FPFISE51 Inc. REF OMV 4 36101 PROGRESS ESTIMATE 43 /ARC 2535 0 1191 1366 THOMAS CKOWN BRUNSWICK CEEB CREEK ENTRY MONO SUhMER INSTR. 471, CLASS T450/60 75761 25752 30/2611 551 LANES BURK1 LLOYD SUMMER TNST ROCTOR 473 25)57 168.30 911.72 362 BU PK1 fOff AhN SUMMER INSTR. 42. CLASS TI10 -7501 SUMMER 25354 21091.37 1730 MARIANNA BYER 3NSTFD4903 43 CLASS 8110 -70 LIND AEG.F CIDER 25365 1.096.92 1648 108 C.E.P.O. C.1 .1. EVGINEE WING W90)3 AEC 483426/71 PEG. fFf /OF 681E AOAnS -89 NMTR CONE. 25356 •5357 10.00 15.00 1199 CPNf UIiA NTS CAIIf ORNIA RUNIC [PAL INS UPANCE VICTORIA /TERRA VISTA. ETC. PETRO PFF XIUX ADJUST 16758 C DEPOSIT PRIM 25359 231'663.00 f l D NNN � 7-20 -00 L151 OF WFN.INTS RANCHO COCA MOMGA PAGE 3 �� 4 PAYEE ITEh DESCR ... ............. y_ ---- '• ----- •25360 rt.9r 111 14 CHICK'S SPORTING 00005 INC CITY RENTALS T- SHIFTS SPECIAL PRONG y -- -- ---- - .k. 752 COCHRAN C NICHOLS, INC. BALANCE DUE ON INVOIC C OTHER ITEFS MUD FLAP 2f )61 354.89 202.45, 681 1607 COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES CONSUMER DEPORTS HAND MELD RADIGS /CHAR C OTHER ITEMS 25362 25)67 1,70721 `x 1641 EFREM COY WCONTRACT 12 ISSUES EMPLOYEE 9 HAS - 7/9 25764 183.00 "A' 4 02 1840 N B COVET INC IN• CAME CNIS 4LFR MAINTENANCE LABOR OT 25365 24766 47.92 •- 4. 05 CIKAMON DA CO MATER DIfT HAVEN EMPLOYEE 7/4 25367 60.00 19.52 954 GAYLE CUTHBEFTSON I E HAVEN N JERSEY BLVD C OTHER ITEFS SUMMER INSTR 483, CLASS 7130IT301.02 23366 482.61 941 CUxY'S AUTO SUPPLY STORE DAYCO AELT 25169 117.85 239 1606 D C K CONCRETE CO 0 E M x CORPORATION TICKET NUMBER 65151 C OTHER ITEMS 25370 26111 b74 999.06 x 345 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 2640152/2686 4 iTRES 25372 3,000.00 ?: NT GAY- iCREEK INC. C OTNCF• ITEMS JA PNT /REFILL GRID 25173 1,511.54 •• 1805 1844 DEER CREEK CC FNAIT OEJAVU HAIR C NAILS DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT H 2949 25774 25775 17.70 1762 JAMES OENSON MILEAGE OF BUS. IIC. 610746 26376 1,000.00 157.20 1410 877 ERIC DOROTHY KICK ERIC DICK 7 /4ECON 1/4 CONTRACT EMPLOYEE-13 HFS. 25177 29370 S5.70 BAS OICTAPNOME SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 53 112 MNS 25319 63.44 280.60 1617 NICK OEEOE FICN DICTA MITE PORTABLE /TRANSCRIBER 25360 57.]1 Imo,, 1215 1112 TOM OIETL REFUND CLASS t 7)12 SUMMER INSTRUCTOR 822, CLASS 1410 25761 10.00 v J 346 DISPLAY AMERICA DNORAK, GAYLE Nf OSTEA'S DICTIONARY 25)02 25783 1583.40 59,00 523 EASTMAN, INC SUMMER INSTRUCTOR 014 CLASS 7600/02 25384 702.90 459 EGGHEAD SOFT" BE DATA BINDER NUMBER M C OTHER ITEMS CRICPET GRA;w 25384 1,457.79 '196 1686 PATRICIA ELMORE EMPIRE CAMERA C OTHER STEPS SUMMER INSTR. 873, CLASS 8012/14/16 29386 29387 660.72 1834 MIKE FARPER CANON CONTRACT SNP. 10 HAS /PLAYOFD 25388 861.]0 169.95 486 1644 LONTE FELBERG FIANCES INC. 28 HAS INSTRUCTOR 25389 !05.44 306.92 124 JOAN FLORID OVERPAYMENT BUSHIliC010617180/01 SUMMER INSTRUCTOR 25)91__ 66.10 1052 333 FRANKLIN G 947 CLASS 7170 -71 BINDER /LINED PAGES /hEETIhO AGENDA 25792 114.74 1137 SULTINGTf P S CONSULTING CIVIL ENGENEEPS TON] GAF TEA /T ENOTNEERING SERVICES FOR MAY BB 25791 74394 ITT GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 24 MRS 2,459.00 129 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES BILLING FOR 944.3617 C 0TNE0. ITS PS MONITOR FOR 26795 2,415.44 1011 DON GREEK C ASSOCIATES PC CNTR, IBM CABLE SET 5ANYON ST DESIGN 25397 111.39 Olt 1024 GRACE GRO OFY ROBERT GUERRA ADMI C OTHER ITEMS IUMER INSTRUCTOM U, CLASS 07210 253983 25399 4,366.19 REFUND CLASS 0 7]x0 28400 198.00 6.00 D NNN y •x'11., - ,KYlat -,, :w:_#;a<'�ti'.�.'X,'�.fi Jv�'F�e 25402 366.40 APAYNENT OF BUS LTC 612453 25403 - CN ADVANCE FOR CHIA MEETING 25404 7 -20 -AB LIST OF WARRANTS y , i PAYEE TRACT EMPLOYEE :2 112 NCS {.. ------------------- •------------ - - - - -' 25407 67.50 IN CLASS 97',10 P1C 666430 TM 993 HACIENDA LANDSCAPE INC. ' 1197 JULIE NAFPEA _ ,1646 HARRY'S FIRE DETAILING 26411 A98 JIM HART 3 820 EDWARD C. HEARD PND 25413 1539 KRISTEN HERCHIMAGEOSR .'e 1126 HARRY HILOE6RAN0 25415 1921 DIANA HOBBS 25416 926 DENISE NUTT .t 495 HYDRO -SCAPE PRODUCTS. INC 25418 697 , I.C.B.O. +' 709 ALBERT IGE 25420 912 INDOOR COMFORT CONTROL INC. 26421 167 INTERNATIONAL CONF BLOZ OFFICIAL 26422 697 DIANE JOHNSON 26423 1832 STEVE JONES 25424 3618 KATHLEEN KELLY 25428 1386 KERN EQUIPMENT 25426 910 WILLIAM KING 16427 25426 1849 THE KPOK COMPANY 25429 Sit KOZLOVICH DEBBIE 23430 1272 L C '. TGUAS 25431 1643 LA \OZ 25432 193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 25433 849 LAHSON PRODUCTS, INC. 23,34 293 ANNE LESCRINIER 254!6 540 LOGUE, SALLY 25436 1606 C C T CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES 25437 936 TAN PAC DONALD 26438 1837 MARENA RAMIREZ 25439 76 MARKMAN C ARCZTNSKI 26440 230 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 25441 1125 MC GAREC MACHINE 865 WANDA MC GUIRE 689 JASON PETER 602 PAT MEYER 418 RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES 642 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG. FEPAIA 1143 CHEARICE PULLGRAV $61 WILLIAM MUSSER 230 N 5 I'S THE 04FICE PLACE '1 }i'i'i °i�'.' L4•V a " ... _ RANCHO CVCAPONGA PAC£ 3 ITEM OESCR WARRO WARR.AMT. GRESS ESTIMATE 96/ C OTHER ITEMS 25401 93.743.46 AIR INSTRUCTOR 912 CLASS 1090/91 25402 366.40 APAYNENT OF BUS LTC 612453 25403 6.60 CN ADVANCE FOR CHIA MEETING 25404 514.00 AIR INSTRUCTOR 615 CLASS 7420 -30 25405 240.00 TRACT EMPLOYEE :2 112 NCS Z6406 61.00 NDURSF,KENT -4LAN REVIEW /FIAE DEFT 25407 67.50 IN CLASS 97',10 P1C 666430 25400 30.00 UND CLASS 6 413 21,409 20.00 TALLATIOH - C OTHER ITEMS 25AIO 666.430 ISTRATIRN OF ICCO -ASK 26411 240.00 PER Ik'iRUC.OR BSA. CLASS 0t302 26412 44.66 /ICE AC UNIT SHER1 C'OTMER ITEMS 25413 113.91 750091VIOI0TAPE /UBC 26414 109.14 4ER INSTRUCTOR PAT CLASS 97440 25415 99.00 (BALL SCOMEKEEPER 6 MRS 25416 30.00 JAG CLASS ♦ 7460 21417 30.00 10 SW1tCH /FLAP /LABOR 25418 396.11 ?UTER SERVICE 9 FgIURS 24419 450.00 IT DUTY SURFACE MO!NTEO 91200 -11 25420 164.42 IER-INSTRUCT OR 06, LLASS 7310 -12 26421 $06.65 GNIGNTER LAUOMLIN C OTHER ITEMS 26422 1.510.50 OUS DISPLAY ADS 26423 194.40 IVE C REPLACE CUC5 C OTHER ITEMS 25424 8.649.00 1T. SUPPLIES ASD PARTS 25428 300.94 .ER INSTRUCTOR 9t CLASS 97220/1 ER INSTR 06.CLAC} 25426 211.80 6090.02 C IO (PAYMENT BUSINE23 LICENSE 16427 25426 439.31 5.96 IER INSTR 950 CUSS 97160 C 7103 25429 1.081.07 TRACT EtFLOYEE 6 MRS 23430 39.04 IMANT: AAYMONO C. P 25431 - '64.00 III KE 25432 37.02 '.NLESS BACKFLOW CASKE7Si LABOR 25433 f63.50 'BALL SCOREKEEPER MRS 23,34 30.00 {PACT EMPLOYEE 714 OTHER ITEMS 254!6 113.50 'BALL SCOREKEEPER 24 NPS 25436 120.00 'ACTION TkSTING 25437 341.50 .Y /GASKET LASE /OIL C OTHER ITEMS 26438 536.65 'UTER INTERN PAYPENT 25439 370.00 '.ER INSTRUCTOR 012 CLASS 67330 26440 126.22 TFDR /PRTR.OAISYWMEEL 25441 43.00 m -- 7 -20 -68 LIST OF WARRANTS PAYEE ------------------------------------------- ITEM OESCR ---------- 1162 N B S / LOWRY 522 NATIONAL GRAPHIC SUPPLY 1VG51 COMM FACILITII 1671 NATIONAL SOLID WASTES MANACKENT 1712 CONFHPECIST. NONRIS- FEPKE, IhC, CONTRACT En ►LI 1842 STAN NUBDSHI AMETHYST AT /7 770 MICXELF OLIVER WINDROW ELEA 8 627 OLYMPIC STUDIOS, INC. SUMMER INSTR. 232 MITRANS SUMMER IhSIFUC 1625 CITY OF 04TARIO BUS PASSES C I 911 1652 ONTARIO INDUSTRIAL WED. CLINIC HELEN WESWAC LUNCH 0", EMPLOYMENT 1e23 OTTENS P I R A REFUND CLASS R 468 PAC TEL MEMBERSHIP FOR 229 PACIFIC PRODUCTS, INC. BILL FOR 00404' 658 PAS GRAPHICS SOLEhOI0 21 V 1 60 P06DENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY WAX STICK WPPSI 1804 DAVID PURCELL MAT 46 STARBURS 251 R C R AUTOMOTIVE OVERPAYMENT PES 251 R C R AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR DRIVERS 1118 PARCO CONSULTANTS SAFETY INSPECTI 1836 RUCT RAMIREZ 19TH fT ACOUISI 1811 MARX KAYO CONTRACT EtP10Y 1847 -\ REDLANDS PLUMBING SOFTBALL SCOREK 3611 RENT A PONY /LINOA MENARY OVERPAYMENT OF d 112 RITZ CAPERA CENTERS PONY' RIDE D RFD 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 600 SPEED fI N 343 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO 6LACKLINE PRINTI 1835 SCOTT ROeInSON PROGRESS PA MEN' 1933 CATHY RUBIN CONTRACT ENPLOYI 1822 SAINT PIERRE MECKWEAR AEFL490 CLASS NT: 1201 SAP alms KA N 51 Oh OVE flPA7 NENi BVS1 1615 5101 SW IDS DESIGN AWARDS 469 KAREN SCAFUTO SOFTBALL SCORIAE 621 ELIZABETH SCHMIDT SUMMER INSTR 021 789 JAMES SCHROEDER SUMMER INSTR 633 1814 SHARON SCHULZ 3AL DUE ON JUhE 1877 OTC. OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE REFUND 955 DIANE $MINICAN PROCESSCAPPLiCAT 1629 CARLOS SILVA SUMMER INSTR 1658 PAULA SM IIItE RfFUND ClAif 690. 90 RFFUNO CLASS 6 it RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 4 ------ -__ - -_ WAAR6_- MAMANT. IfT 666 -1, 587 -011 25142 172.16 1 1/2', "AT 60A FD 26443 J6.97 e5OMr 0 O'NEAL 24444 610.00 6.S MRS. . 25443 33.77 COVERAUEHI2 'IRS MS 75417 9,006.96 CLASS 7D2S-e 013 25446 66.00 64 CLASS 1000/373 26449 1,147.46 CA ROS 1,609.76 36450 AN C OTHER ITEMS 25131 35.00 LS 31.50 `6452 3 25153 20.00 HART 75454 6.00 1 25456 65.00 C OTHER ITEMS 26456 219.07 26437 615.02 C OTHER ITEMS 2f4S6 44.63 R 06 -6956 69.98 36459 U C OTHER IICKS 75460 6.00 MI C OTHER ITEMS 26461 3,255.16 -Z OTHER ITEMS 25462 6,132.94 Has . 7f 461 61796 e7 R 16 MRS. 26464 39.04 LIC 412069 25465 90.OD L COMM PARK 7,4 25466 69.10 75467 615.00 fU C DINER ITEMS 23166 33.77 ' 2 75469 167.96 1/3 254711 24,927.44 REC 6M52552 19 25471 66.12 lI C6MSE 25472 ° 1.00 75477,_ 31.49 31.5 MRS 25474 1,036.75 ASS GO,; 6021 25478 166'38 ff 6001 -6017 25476 726 65 - 111 h DROVE 2A477 356.40 36476 71.94 FOR NOTARY ITC. 25479 13.00 SS 7011[ TI75 25480 36.60 R C OIMER ITEMS 25451 170.60 100.00 25182 24.00 Fi 1 j ;vS `.� ..' \`.%�1 i'i+"�ei%_•ii Y �'+tlY.-T.•Aa .' -.D: 1 7 -20 -88 LIST OF WARRANTS PAYEE ----------------------------------------------------- ITEM J - 1194 EVELYN SMITH - SUMMER INSIRUi 1135 LAURA SMITH SUMMER 14STRUI 3 17 $GUINEAN CALIFOXNIA EDISON CO. 9161 BASELINE 319 SOUTCERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BILLING FOR 9. 532 SPANGNOLA, SAN SUMMER INSIR I 1519 DEBORAH SPENCER - REFUAO CLASS 1 1931 SALLY STANKE PLASTIC CANVA: 1510 SUPER SEER COFPORATION PROTECTOR VEN1 376 SURVEYORS SERVICE ING. TAPE LUI 1066 DAVID 7AUSSIO C ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING ! FII 1521 JAN 7ERVET REFUND CLASS F 613 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE OVEFPAYNENT F1 1045 TRI COUNTY OFFICIALS FOR 471 TRICO TROUBLESHOOT 1 972 U S SPFINT 981 -6499 540 UNITED COMPUTER SYSTEMS HARDWARE C $OF 391 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE PROGRESS ESTIN 1660 VANSER GRAPHICS CORP PAYROLL CHECKS 667 VISA ACCT 04520-OOP 1661 LIEN VO REFUND CLASS 7 175 CARL WARREN C CO RICHARD P "IA EPUBLISHING NCOC ORP TO COMET 117 07 WEST 1649 GAILE NIEFENOA SPRING PIAND R �• 21 2 WI ll01N ASSOCIATES PAYOF FOR PFOP 572 JOANNE HITTER SUMMER INS7RUC 1810 DAVID WOHLGENUIH REFUND CLASS 9 509 XEFOX CORPORATION NEWER USAGE 1115 L1405 2BINDEN REFUND Cult a 471 063 RANCHO CUCAPDNOA PAGE S _ IAARIN WARR.AMI. . LASS - 0004 -06 26163 222.76 LASS 07605 25404 173.65 OTHER ITEMS 25465 1,306.94 NE 25456 14.63 17321 C 7321 25467 269.26 . 965153 26406 15.00 JOGET YEAR 26469 4,25 16T/KIT 25490 466.00 VS C HOLDER 26491 120.97 YSULTING SVC 25197 270.00 61116/63129 25493 40.00 •06 25494 173.06 6116 C 30 26495 2,601.00 )TOR RADIO S 25496 11.66 25197 11.97 20196 10,952.40 25499 14,171.65 25500 640.12 25501 96.01 25502 21.00 26103 742.35 25501 616.79 26505 22.70 25306 30.00 25107 SnD.00 265D8 415.10 26609 12.00 25510 2,613.62 25511 36.00 TOTAL CHECKS 616,6l5.j6 k ,e N 0 I to Mllam roil $1, tlM IWN WIN rim MI[I[II IaAa a? II RM it MR w1oM Mr 1 I11.IN.N I ul.aLn I tMlllt twt lots forgot MNrn .NIMII dl rn-t Mw" Mvednot N IR9 r 1 1, M twlrtlll Ott Imllant ;dlA WIN IMttt 1. INI. a qr d MM I f I..t.t IdIM M nOldlt It 1411W. IIONM N ltl W WdfdlM Z�PI FOIM Mlrlr.t. 14 I.I.t 119�N 4rr4 tta paipt NIfiam ddibS tN fla IIN1111/ It wl MI alai MIININ npOltpn. NR mm�w nn M 1tgoM trur<a n - I ti "s a { MIRI —Tim Is111MiM- nxul O WIN MR n, w w IMtlnml mar Milan "I MiMln mn I m 4rt111MiM N Mlldl - Iwt ...............11I.M1.11LN n.n m 111 1.N1 1. 60 W11141n N MNtlt - I I L .............1 %SI1.T.n 11.4 In IO 1.111 ?.In INd Ittl1 Nrnttwt fwh ...............1 LN 1 i 1.7111 7.1111 Non tttntOF ..........................t LIM"33 ».M 111 11 7.191 1.10 rNed Mgoti 1. - tMla ..............1 6,11I.171.M n.I) NI 111 7.439 7.w Ft jt Illrt Ittw - 14.1 .............I LIN.M1.n 1,71 M 11 6,711 LMI IIr11Mt Nt1O I trltln ...................I I.M.M.M I.n /.In 1.711 11.110 LNI MI Inttm Mtltldr.11 ................I 1.1N.w.101 LM %111 LI11 LIN LIN MNllltron Mrltln- IloWth ......... 1 1111.01.0 1.0 ILOm %III n.M7 21.1111 nil tM s w 1111110. ..............1 47.N1.ind1 I".0411 111 nl .W1 1.Mn uml IndNlitlnllM Ntst4 ..................I Rl.ln.1/ I.IM 1.110 4t IrINN I.,M11 tdttlditnl 1ul MM gol IMmlml....... I...........1 a.rR.11LM IWN WIN rim MI[I[II IaAa a? II RM it MR w1oM Mr 1 I11.IN.N I ul.aLn I tMlllt twt lots forgot MNrn .NIMII dl rn-t Mw" Mvednot N IR9 r 1 1, M twlrtlll Ott Imllant ;dlA WIN IMttt 1. INI. a qr d MM I f I..t.t IdIM M nOldlt It 1411W. IIONM N ltl W WdfdlM Z�PI FOIM Mlrlr.t. 14 I.I.t 119�N 4rr4 tta paipt NIfiam ddibS tN fla IIN1111/ It wl MI alai MIININ npOltpn. NR mm�w nn M 1tgoM trur<a n - I ti "s a { •ivnnr, nn "s Joe aum n MIMI, m Mis - J2111, tin MrtnMR PPMM nun -m- stal" on Lab? IfaII1 Ism ant Ib MIN pNit WX an W Ia Nn 0 NI f +,y Iu101utJ M WWI - IIN 0131 6114,1.1 m Wind 91,00.11 .91.M." . 13.010 :.W 1.W I.m whin Y I MIN Mt s u aNts "in 10106111 1010.1.0 10,0610 /.ail 1.M I.m wr✓a Zi will m r l 4IM M 10^0 111,01.0 IN,M is LDi s.D I.m 961ST "In Wa7M W maim 91,M.N ".Mo 91,11." I.M /.W 9.113 1011111 0361 MI1NN sm JI4IM I0,M.1 Ia,M.M IM,MI.M mn I.la I.al Junin a1M m 61114 Initial 111,01.10 iM.M.N 11,01.0 I.= 9.M 9.m wn111 Mn m M L o out" 111,41.01 IN.M." 10I.ML11, LI% Lm LIa NIIIIM Mm "sN m III" la,m.a In,m.n IWIL73 LW LM LM "Own man Ni M NUIU Wasm M^41 M^41 DI,IN. /l L01 Lan Lot comm „i 1011 MN N 1N11u IIllun 7 ",113.11 911,113.0 111,11/." a.an LM LM ill" NJI m N mtu JInIM NI.III.0 21,111.4 711,117.41 LM LW 1.041 Mill" Om WIIII WIMP MM 12114,11 ".w." ".Ma 91,10.0 LW LW Lill M112111 4^ Nan Matm11 mim 1.6 WHIN IN.M.M W.M." 100,W.0 LIII 1.611 1.117 Mm /0 Win WIL"Nu IV" 91.W.0 T..M.N 91,01.44 Lin LM Lill 11!0/0 ' 0171 bin MIit,m Milli" I1,m.0 IMrM." I1,M.N Lan ..DI :.an W11111 Moll tin Mil I ILA & I I1.040." MINIX 100,01.1 1,01 1.01 1.11 "MIN 0141 till IaMR Ma waim Ia,M.1 iM,M.N 1a.W.0 I.W I.W /.1n "Min ' 0111 =m wll/M 1010M." 10.01.00 10.04'.0 I.W I'm Mal wllll/ "I ttl in 1111 IJIIm W.M.M W,M." W.M.N 1.01 /.W ).m lv/ MW 1140 WIW m w.lm 111.M." la,M.a Ia,M." I.m t.m Lnl Im1m "JI MMtt wxln NM w1uM 11,11.0 IN,M.M I0,40.O O.ID ILIn 161111 CPIl91 "III Ilnt MIW N 1 a It wim IM.M.O 14,01.0 Ia,M.N I.w I.W • m "m mum lo'/mui I.N maim 111,111.% N1,117." Nl,1a." Lou LM 1 w MMI mltnnta WIM Ilium 4,1",104.0 1,111,11.11 1,1 ",W.N /.W 14151 I, will Nn1 p i mimvw m 13/11111 10.0.0 IMrW.11 Im,W.N ?.an I.W l.ltt IIUM" 110 wifm I4' w 13111,11 111101.0 116111.11 IN•M.O 1.20 CIA 1.01 WII091 Nno 1161051111.0 Nlilm 13,11.0 91,11.0 N.M." 1.11 1.01 1.10 "Ilya aa" 1111141 -milm MM MnM IN.M.a 1 ",M.p M.Mn.N ).W 1.50 LW 61 ,210 IOitl u n4N M b 1101 t0. wMm ".M." ".w." 91,40.1 LM L01 1.111 WW" 0611 tim" I"IIN I am 09114,11 91,11.1 ".M." ",01.0 LW &W Lill Wlun Aunt CAIN I041t9 MIi wn1A 11,011.11 IN.M.N 10.00." I.m I.m 1.313 NM/11 MIII I'lim IIM Q utIIW 42111111,11 1N,W.0 111,11.11 11.m." I,IM 1101 I.M 61mm "m MIIML M N uln. amm IM,W." 111,00.0 I0,O4" LM LM 1.111 12MIN Nn1 mmatimm 11111111 IN.M.4 10,11.0 1101M.N 1.114 1.700 1.11 MIIMN Man m" "Mtn 100,01.0 W.M.1 100,01.01 I.m LM I.W "MIN "1n IOO1t 111m 11M w14m I",01.0 IN,M.4 116101.0 1.11 Can Mal 11.'11191 OW 11111 1[ WIN 1M 1 mJ IImM IY,01.M 1M.01.0 111,11.0 mn l.ln 1.n, 111 " /N NAI KilA una11 IOU 19111/17 11,01." 11,01.11 1110.01.14, LW LM Lill "it" 114 MIT Nn MM Mull I ",11.11 I0.01." 101.11.0 Lan 1.131 t.fa unnN MID n1N[In MM 011lull "'on." N,M.M ",M." ).11 l.W I."? alum 110. 1111111110 Will ",M.M ",W.O 99.01.0 1.01 LM LID 01111191 Mtn 140110111111141mal loom IN,01.0 IN,M.M I1,M.p I.W I.W IAn u11J11 "an W 11101113 4:,111 M Iuim :4,00.0 IN.M." 11,01." 7.10 1.10 1.1" OaDm mail 4N1M1111L Wull 91,01.1 ".W.M M,M.11 LW 1.•11 LIII O118m N•11 Ulm ILU11M Iu1JM tN,M." IN,M." 111,11.0 I.M 9.M I.m w14A $111711911 nn M nttl anus. ". t 4 ks� amour IPl�W4t I/W31 nn a wox Qfl14)<1 N 7 IL"Ix" at 2@ I W11L1 • R.[IR"1 A2 1, IM n1m4II O4t0 -221- 9094444 022 Mn [ai IM NA 01042 ILW 106 M I15 Mx 10 ai Mxlum W MIT - m MIR 0011 tmrm IQ W mora111/14111 M.M.N IN,Nta 110,900.99 1.00 LIN In0 a1141M 17 Ienr 2 MUI[ ■PL Wa I2/laN tW 11111 W ni'vocN I<r.M,N ULM," 7.175 ?.In 7.224 12241410 111 Ml} wrmu wo IIW IImm Timm ",M,N aLm" ".M.0 In.M.N ".40.10 LIN Lw Clio Jimmy wt NW 07"WIn wimm 111N1a IY.M.N 122.00.60 IN,M.N LIN I.M I.M Wn." IN.M.N 7.122 7,[22 7.00 Il 24 lera "I L1. ro1I "n11a 11 /Ym ",M,II 22.00.94 /IN" ",M.N ? -M I.ne 1,110 n"wn NI Hi NLf Mil I It K A WORM a. }/Y IN,M.N IN.M.N IN,NCY CIN I.IIe Lw NMM m KM IIWIB atimrm 41117M nl7ela ","0,w IN,M.O 19.00.94 IY.M.Y ",00." 7.221 I.M 7.111 Onim no am 122110 mm m Willa 00.01.011 In100,00 I01,40.00 I.M I.M 7,W 12mms NLQM N Lw 7.00 7.40 Wilm III Mll NN aim timita 7109422, ",M.N ".M." ",M.N Lin Lm 1."I Rally; w w Nm Warm Full wa Willa nln UN IYIIm Willa ".M." ".ma ".NLN I,nl 1.221 1.in Illlrm no will 11101110 [all wW a /22410 Iw,NLN ",M." :N,w,n 100,10.10 I.w 7,110 /.0,V /11/1111 20 ".NCY 11.00 N 7.751 7.01 7.131 a'11M M mmLl M am 14,104,07.10 11.n0,11t10 I11111.wL10 I.w 7.111 127 Imnlua 7 Mir 11 L 94111 9414 M%w {NIB BRM111I xw 011118117 "P.M." IN.M.Y IM.{Y.N 7.00 1.00 1.00 el111111 I[ 004 419011[ IIYWU 1 I [ 94111/11 smal ".M." HIM" ".M.N 22.00.90 ".00.08 LM LM Lill Y 17M 22.00.94 LIN Cal 1.10 ILYM III Mal 1ex901 rmn NI l Im t1161n "'ma M,M.Y ".M.w LM 3.00 Lill IMM Its a taw "to M -III Mm I1" aM7e ",00." 19,40 N 19.40.0 LIA I In LIN noun 111 win Ill wlim 1 LM 11>lpII1W11L M10m ".M." ",KIM ".M.0 LM CHO Lan 1211700 111 Mw tYwi011L 11111 /r allim 99,00.0 ".M.Y 99,00 0 ",M." ",M,w I-M4 1.751 LW Willa 11 0022 Miami «al [Nis Rain, "CON.a mow" ".40.60 Lm Lm 1.01 Ilnlm 40.00.10 I.tw 1.00 1.11 In I'm as milt Hill (3111111 tin an Lml4 Ulm 012Ulr 199.00.94 I01100." IN.M." LIL 1.00 ?.241 amen it, 211 Nlw watIMIN m wim UMM Wn/4 ",M." ".N0," ",Mn ",M.n ",24.0 IIn Lin 0.7p limits In Him S"lalt wla W"M ",M." ",M." ",M." LIN 1.20 Cl0 IYnm ".40,00 24 9411 CWf it L 1119422 ",40.w ".00." 1.00 Crop 1.02 10,1100 11,40 90 LIN L00 Litt an1M 211 M" any WI14 mm 1 L1a [4122 wm a2wlb 110.00.94 I".M.n tn,M.M 1.110 1.110 1.1131 Mum w1 I wit m maw W mll g. 11 / "m ",Jim ".00,90 ULM." 19.00.0 "LUS N ",M.n LM Love CM, Italia Ia,M.90 Ill M0 logo" 1 i L e1m,N 99.0 .0 ",00,11 1.00 1.00 1.00 07111M ".00.10 Lln LIn L "1 Whin 20 000 Nm rll4nl raw wile 11ILC14 w1B I IN 12,14M I21w11 7w.M.N 10.1110 1N.M." I.C10 Lou 1.110 1211X90 In In M4 rant MM14 w1a alum 19,M." ",M.N 91.00.0 ".M a 99.01.90 LIn LIM LIa a /1IM "-WI" In Mir ram 112(311 WIB 11,101111 ",M,n ".M." Lou 1,00 Lill alum ",M." Cm CAN LIn Willa 111 0074 Mil 7161 nxw wry 2161 LNL wall wW IImn7 111141" [N.M. N IY,M." 10.00.00 1 M CH, Laa IInaN lit 1" 0 "May U"M Iw [N.M." 10010010 100.00.0 1.00 1.14) IOU 11,11/11 10 0243 IsCte 11 ll'" "U"J ".a "Ho"" 0 I,2a-eMel.a i.w i.W t,y nnnT m NIII Walls (fax 60m111 IM.M.N 100.40 Y IY,M N 7.41 l.w ten "MM 24 "n+nm ill. s 4194 r,rtNU " r varam HKOW RoO nun p iLVT�19 Illinois K11u1 - IMMTR as U, im F0191tK Ulm -III- Will" "Al SIR nor FO"ni IrIK aR U. W "R RyI %,000.00 : ".WIN miniam F OMIT - I I l 140,0400 40,140.11 .� 01111 W Inn INTO 1 TCV "mat r`7 am KIIIK wm "am 114,01.40 III.MI.M 001 Hit KF= w1O 40161119 ".10.40 ".01.40 44141 mt KVM IMO alma a MIII wit "CIFIC OF W fit" "'W" "'N." MIN IMat40 Fn LK Oita? 141,01.0 I04.M.N Mm "191011[ $ i t nmm %.01.00 ".nl." any "7l® FMW 1 tMi ntam {, Wirt la/ will M R[Iln 17111m - 00111 1 AM MM I n" 0114" ' 1040 o 01'01 \ Iw Harm ".wa "lmoty Nlty Ini. (Y O"IIO 1 lW Ill" ".M." ".M." MI% IIX1!>1311CIE mm "lMr0 100."1." 1M.M0." 41111 0HIn /IIllK WIN 011" ".MLN ".M." NOT Win w1O 1 TOO ILYLa M.W." ".MO." IW K t- 111101 aim "mill .N,WO.n 140.M." 4110 IKIFI2 mat wim QI:1lM in ^" m.ucts Hour Wl I"IW wall W warm 140,111.40 1.I2 1.1% 7.111 ty1N119 Milt Fly midi 0lt'./ Wlim I00.NO.N T.M I.m t.pl 17431" IM.w.o la.M.a m nr1O1i: 4112048 \out f Min RVASIV 610V 0wim Wm TV" FIRST nm 1111 /m Mm Iw40 wim 1 TIN nnvu 4031 w mW IMO "may Mtn I[IMTR FUCK 111 loyalty Wit fart "111 f 1l "nit" will 001900 tM W 1 W Omar 0ITA Kw wlm m 171W11 111 ttol" F1X1. m 11111111 "m MW Mir. wiW WMm MITI KIIMI{T wlW&m W191a Will vP TKtFm 0110 Italy" Wlrl :RlIM I I l "npM 0004 I11nILi 4110100 Warm 40191 0001101 n1IW \ Tat "Nn1 MITI NCl 1"IV \ LM "IN low Oita TK is wlW 144743 owl ala RK1 IMIW .11440 wit %nMFtKAItL 1312110 "1A K9nK wlm 6 tm fulw IamU M 1RLiW IKl 4EKl IMiTK19 Sinn. 4CM lltn RIMV IWT m %,000.00 : ".WIN ".N1.0 T.MI 7.M 1.m pl0m 140,0400 40,140.11 4a.IN.41 1.1% /.1% 7.101 almm 7".717.19 7N,nt.A 70,:11.11 I.m /.w 7.01 Mmm %1,119.\/ IN'"L" 7rt.mm 1.W I.m 7.01 W" "'W'm 9P.W.0 ".MLM II.m ILIA Hart MDIIn 114,01.40 III.MI.M IN.ML" t.w I.m T.W IUI9n TV MIN ".W.0 ".NI." LIN L%1 1.01 "191140 ".10.40 ".01.40 99,00.00 LIU LM LW HAIAI 10.00.40 w,IM.a 10,01." 7.91 /.III 1.19 amA1 IM,M1.M 1 ".01.40 w.M .00 1.50 1.01 L01 Will" INIM." m.01." I0.10.0 7.100 1.140 1.1" "min "'W" "'N." ".ML40 LT9 L"1 LIN WWN in,w 0 IN.ML" IN.IN.a LIN 1.101 1ml WITm 141,01.0 I04.M.N IM.m." 1.1" 1.101 7.1" Mir" 10.01.0 104.00401 1".01.0 1.704 1.740 t.w umm %.01.00 ".nl." "'W." ?.W 7.91 T.W Oliver ",N0." ",w.a ".IM.1l I.m 7.01 1.191 Ilnlrn 10.00.00 IN.04" Ia.li1." 7.01 1.10 1.01 "l11/n 1M.w.0 10,101.0 10,111.14 LIU LIM LTA WIIm ".0441 ".MO." 99.01.01 LIN LW Lill 07171111 ".101.40 ",000.0 99.01.00 LIU 1 191 Ln1 WMm I"'N0.0 ALM.0 IN.MI." 7.70 I.n1 1.01 illala ",M." ".01.0 ",IM." Lm LIM 1.411 121111M ".wa "lmoty ".00.00 LIU Lm LW "mm 140.00.01 1",101.04 10.0.4 LM LM Lill llmm ".M." ".M." "'Mm 1.7" T.w 1.01 "mm 11!,004." 1"."1.0 iM.m.0 mu 1.190 7.191 Timm 100."1." 1M.M0." I40.MI.M LIN LIN Lm nnim ",401." "'W A ".040.40 1.419 LIM CIA Way" ".MLN ".M." ",MO." LIN LIM 1.711 IU"la 10.00.00 IM.MI." 30,N1." 7.01 1.100 1.101 117119 M.W." ".MO." ",IM.* 1.113 LIM L411 121043 ".000.0 ".1".04 99.041.01 Lin Lin LIU Not" .N,WO.n 140.M." IM.101." 1.90 I.W Lin 19In119 ",M." "'W.0 ",000.0 1.0 I."0 T."1 "two in ^" m.ucts IM.M .0 1.111 7.7% 1.191 "mm IM,w.M lectmo M 140,111.40 1.I2 1.1% 7.111 ty1N119 0.000.0 ".w." ".000.0 0.10 7.10 Mir Wam 100,00.0 140.00.40 I00.NO.N T.M I.m t.pl 17431" IM.w.o la.M.a 111.10.40 LIU I.51 I.m MI00m LI70d31." 11I2I.M." I.IILm.II 7.167 7.175 1110,40.00 1.w.41La Mm.mo 1.111 Lm 1.111 s In 1 p f' UA p YN tll'lllal.. _ _ w °-• .,33.'1....• "rz�• -� - ..(01540 1pn0.a 5[0115. 10110191 n- 7 - •� At it, IRA I0w1111 PJKKX Alm ^III— YNIR AIR - WI I� MR m 1061010 OMat Rim UII AN w MR 11 MI 11IYIIIM 11fq flft b. 4 1®m W.W p "rte R nut 401 aMM a1-ma 50+00.00 14411110 1.711 Lill LIM Oalm 1 ' m Itp p 1M" U pul MIY YMU Harm rO,m,n 22.40." 217,70.0 1.271 1.011 7. In W1941 n 's Knl "it Ita LI. anlm Wllm 4110141 81."190 1,0O,a1.a 1.00,00.0 4107.0 ).}10 1,739 Lus awn 1 10101 1011910 MMR Itl%1IN to.mof L90LaS" 10.m" Lao Lm Il/a wilm N 144.70.90 Lill Lill Ln1 0585), (4 9001 ill" rp1 Am R aXl al" ml any" 111,00.0 1,101,901,00 lu 111,90106 1.773 LIN LAO wams pin Mlle 7361 Lt. 51/7141 1nd44.0 I1m.0a.11 977310.01 Lln Lul L9A 0130 if I 0011 100110 Lt, 117041 amm 01110 1,140.900.91 90,11111 7.110 7.w I.w INOm a NNI >vI IMf U amm 117.04.11 1100,00.90 10,361.11 Lm LIN Lm nmm X I }311.00,90 1,w,m.90 7,117,00.90 1311 1.511 1.111 1101141 in ti L'/nlLLl W 111x61) 1,10,044.33 0.1m.000.01 LIa./44.A ).lA 1211 9 nl[14 itl ums . ®4 411. link FM mill OHO 1410141 4901 1,00,900." 1.X1.901.00 I,XL00.00 1.00 t.m ?.in Oalm lq Ifa11y 114 LIM IR 010 RXIK R 1190" Wam 111A.1mo 1.010.41.90 07.44." 1.900 LIO LIU vmm Z$1 r Mill m141O{m= 114150 61111m 1.01,00.00 1.00.90111 3.140.00.0 1.00100.90 03141.90 1,00 7.w ].100 IilZ$m 111 't; "no nRUL Mn 505 541 1111141 1.50.00.0 I.W,MI.a 1.70.1 1.773 1.274 1.}73 "MAN 20 1.X0,00.90 1.110 1011 ).730 1555541 I. W Y}T,y •� �\ Wm41 M 054161% 1,11I.IZ$.01 1.001,190,0 LRLHL, i.al 1.312 111 t. raft ,IQR) Itm - 1111001 C.= HIM )0161 ]ai mlil� 370141 am 1.00,00.90 I�00�00.10 L00�00,N 7.000 LIN 1,00 a111T 1 nlall rum mn 114 anv90 90111 40,03.0 7M.00O.a 40,90.0 I.Itt L7u 1100 Wiun ]90 T� 1117111 rail41559lil 041/3 mil 10101.11 w,m.N 171,711.81 L41 1.10 Lm 1:1441M In Soma sm mn mo 11mm 900) m,A9.a HS.W.N 'U'ULY 4.734 1730 L5M Wwn 111 MUK in mill M "15'10 11147 tE U Pat roll W SIMI, 10.14.11 1.40,10.01 ra mu 110 Lrll LIN 1111210 III 4710 11111 MY IIT71r 11.441.71 w.SN'" III�Oa,R WISH'" 111,01.71 :.III L41I 1110 011141 710 ,1 ef7n 03141104101 YS 111E LMO 001141 mom.22 01090.0 '4300,90 1,311 ),m 1,41 11134111 I4 311,171,22 Lm 4.111 LIN Islam e 09.11 R1U4 an 01 a4. 017110 01390.01 in."Im In 181.50.00 Lm Lw LtM 90Tm 22 camlo W 14161% L4;I,W.n 4'X1,00.N 121,01.0 6.714 Lu) If ' v 1111!1 Iaplilll y 0549 ION1 MM O1m alitn o0N1 6I1"41M two 15015111 100.14.29 ".W." 0,110.34 LIM LU$ I.W fluff 4.,# '! Hill III"" r® 11,4341 1 }Tar '445'•2 ]A�T.O W,]n.n 1500 1,01 1.731 101011 Lpt 9041 IIMJn t� 00541 Oa4U a 42,419.71 442,117.19 1.00 L331 Liu 12041 4,41 5V."Ln X110.22 410.7190 LS0 Lut La, NIII11 L901 1`1113141 W M1aI1 11/0,30.90 1.0.T.10 I.44110.11 1.11 3.542 5.73] r � UIU Ia14u wiliml5M +t 400 u#L la:in 5031 I)Tm 1,111,0 2,4 1,W.MLN 1,00.117.11 LIZ$ 1.111 Lm 81TI11 1.114 � 11IYIIIM 11fq flft b. 4 1 v Palo —n— "Matti an MMp ItIDm M:[ wP ra rLLR Mmn 7tR w[ W to MY n.. kncm mm unto • TIMM � 0 am PM17 OW room m,Maa 1,nr,oa.M W.Mm IDIM m"I fiat won. .,Mt mr tntm m r awMt 1 P,P1,m.a 21177,733417 P.aldit•11 7.an 7.1731 m anrnts Tttr tr Mao acwm _ c - %m1 IvIUGIII Yvxl Ilim winglfi1g got ot w AR MID l IM t 0f qM q"x MR r IIIQIIm IZ:� Iglq —m-• MIDI" Mil MR vRi'" Iqi vam man wit MR w _ iU Mq q MI M,IC.q I.M /.ftl cm v q,ilj,llstl j- y Itmi1R1 tl[�iK WM tlLPgS/ n• 1 IIw IMtraw 1 R{n '� YS%t1UI K1MII fl 111[ A . 0 "TY• � -2 - s`ri c } ,, t • -•�i 1; rn - Jill It. flat n1n IIO lb MWA wsro1Ntin pn - wit ■valll p0ITIMI' 1 {K1R i "'' rmlutum w tuatr - MK Optl MM w min 1.1M a/N.>y nmw wn1 1,pI,30Lo r „T min min 0M111 1.130 pl1i111 ridw•N wlrin.w d m w 01st 11n w lwltu 1.441 w” 00171 Iw: w Ynlu 40t1 SIM Il/1Vf1 11111111 In,1w.n IO,rN.N will MK OF AMIM LOU vil1IN 1111,11 111,117.0 tw,IN.N NMI 1awmn 1, un1f11 211,1n.It Mn1 IMp1tIK mn NM 1.300 Iilllru 10.00.0 04311 41t KMJM Win 1.111 00111111 11:00.10.0 Min W m nt10w1 m LM 07111M Iw,I01.0 ;f 00111 111-ma nzm 11w 1.130 pllom Iw,pO,M Hui Ki0u01n FMINS m 1.111 $110M 100 ^0 43% 0.L p IW WI1n I.J30 I1IMlp 11,101.11 MNI 1011 K IM 1011 /.M0 7117,11 Ip,001.M 04113 1K11 K IM W 1.111 11/11/11 "'W.M 1pmn W twin Nun 3"00,m" 1,130,111.10 11,111,131.11 `Q nunum w ewln • 111 44011 t90[Inpl / I l 1.101 p1u111 MINIM 1111"11 I7,nl,lw.p 11111 C MpnM t 1 l LOU MM .1,lw.N 0,0/.11 ". "113 411 Klrul Ulm 1.000 :I 11111111 111".0 01111 41r NIIUI Won Ilnr 1.111 Nlilm NI[ W41 K min 44113 I.MI IrlI1111 .tl,p1.00 Oln Win w wulu 004A LIM plt`JY 111,3001.11 wllllw. MCI m out tunm WIGS Nw 1.0 Lin O1M10 n,w1.w Will IIR41I1 41:: 1IMM 11111111 N,p0.0 w,w1.0 pin I.4 m1w1ln WIM /.171 0110411 11,W.w 4ntn W 11111 1K1ip 14,130.0 1,111,10.0 1 II1,111.111 IOUI 441K11MMMM 111131 11111 IOGL KR1 IOwI t1w 1.111 R:1tl1011M1a1 1.00,000.13 1,440,111.10 1,111,110.11 mulw11Mn KJwp pip W w 1011u 1.130 1.01 W.w KIISIF 1Y11Qr I.131,wI.w ),•Al,ip.11 1r1,N1.0 W:n 1I11MQ1 Opp NK K rim N 1.111 11111111 MINIM am, I,M.111, 11 111,11r.01 t' 0 r 1 3 1 -. 0',4 - i.•,'e -_,_ -�- 'rart'N"u •_N -•J J `! - t `�_ ►nil nxrtm Mllnnn7n{ l•`- ^,} -,y RI r; nA A, MI ,Af I y aR IMI11Q11 Itp{ ' "all MR "' ,' v P in, N NIaIOYI Im= , 00111 10'1 N TNa u 7.m-., n/11a1 n7paA a' MIA m w m G 1.m "it" m.two ` 0:1111{ M (Air 7V 1p t,7N.i1La N1.A:.A 1.1C.41.A W lnrtl I1R1 IAiA - ®R I(IIMIXI M11Q1 1,111,I7LM -� 11111.17LM i, ` Imlt 19m lS -11=0 11110:34 k1.416, 1,111,:11.12 %100 nC11lm,Dm Im 1.102 111"m In,141.17 4,007,N /.n NOTICE {can punln mILUN Nino, imion 4 me MA Alm ammu 1•NI _ NOT ililiM WAI lAt 11111.11 MIT uam 11110' I.M 1171, lips I19 O.w W low Map /.N it aunt L7n,111.1I j-�OnTIII 11Ml ma WIIIAMIIN pIMW MIM;,, I.IIIWN I.III.LLII II511110 6a7Rila1 1:p MmIx ORTS". 711,000.0 7G.00L00 was allow Mop, IA,NI.W.A 1,1m,m.n 11,011,113.4 II,In,117.15 r 1 3 1 t l� JUL 13 YINCAIpM iM MCOIm11C I ft &ICNMM I. VW . If Ah k& bwn 0 C." Iroi t,o.d C sm t VINGAM O Ir,r.u6ntle .rw�.Nr�..r.�• IY rJryW rwbr.I'1rN trr. h,iJ.f.Mr I -n m) a LICZ4109 A! N0. C!!-s" mm c W" A dW Orr 724" Al�.d «�« S. 5164 Q Myl YQ I C00I 3615 u i MAMIpJ p MnKAMN rrp a .N f /bw Drr CnUm. F*t A. i IA" OF IIA14.SCIM)16p 1719 t Ae9u.1 C?l u l 4raY Iw[ JIAL 11i[ 1 la.r'.. M brw. -N.rir rd E.wr 97SS R 10 Nuem CI$Y6µ , ITNI 917" S= tOfx t a • n. IN.s.0. ...r n.rr.rr. 11. [rl.be • •rIS• ww.r r rr f r 19 r re wwN.w .wl M M 1.....a Pr M Y. «yG[..a It A(pC - W IM .n1 r.^.i« .e•i.1.d Y .wW Cneewl I.r•... A Iw. M �,. p.t4.fre. M . i...r.. red _ M1l rr lrAM.1.1.r«.....ryrN.r6..ldrl .rlY Mr rw,w NMAb1JY M.«.O. CrrN A.l It 1IAII OF CANOIHA Crrry M .ter • r ru.w ..+� �. r r.w...r.r.. r..ri . 11r.w+. r...... ...w .n ... r r �. .`+. �. r.w.w -.. r..r�•.- rrrrr�rr ...r.rr.. An..wa✓rr....w..v �...r �.rn . ✓w+..�.. .�. r`r..`•rr .mew � rr .... +u r .r✓ .rr.. n.l r .. r........�..wF....r..........w r .mow.. w ..r ..... w...r. w �r a.. r rr..re..w �. r .r.✓... r .......w.. r ..... re F ...r.. r«.. w r An11C FU I4 Ii11f' INNZA. .F.K S... w n�� AMIICATION BY 7RANSMOR It SIAII OF IAtwO �r..r .r...✓.......r..�..r.•..rwr.... n,r.rr......... �rr +.. r... r.w 1 ..w ..Y w ww.. F r Ywr en 4 r ..•Y .Y..... ✓�•. �.✓ w � ..F . ✓wF r Fnw. M . e.. �i. .✓.. w ..�✓ .�✓. wY n.w r. �F r., .�... r Y. w .w. r ...I✓ wMf.e w '_/..M1 .e....e. ✓ wr�.✓.✓v../�r w.✓e. rru.. ✓.✓.. r..F. r.w✓e r •...�F...r w. f.M!'N W�,r Mlwe T1J. fir! i «fArprlw.N U «Q.h A"' ❑ t.twd.de�4 Q Nf w.n . —cam A m .w+x 01p'.61rN_... ;REV- ROCCTE -4 �f REST�l�AN7 IMP SE1) ONE:_Sro Mt♦ntcA�/ �if11L; ARROW PLAZA MARKET , 9755 Arrow Route / 18 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Currently Zoned: ` General Certmericial Zoning of Adjacent Properties ,- North; Nedium Residential South: General Comnericial /Existing School East : Civic Community /Low Residential Hest : General Insustrial Sub -area 03 I.A.S.P. APN# 209- 041 -51 by Torrez, Joe 19 JULY 1988 M ul ' JOGP3175! Mr41✓- b�...rr A/P{"MOO ION A10p1011C UVWAGI SACOMM TO Oyer r AkAdk Im.y. C..1 Srar..CA.9lIP S- Al 2. 1. TTIIO) Ov'.I[000n ti Iq.T OFF Sus ClpA[. And -dr k 210" n.rw p�L.lfew GOCfMICAI - -� O00[ 6.y i II"" OF APRXW 1 lP.vl.Owe UA, On DOM 6 .Tap um _ 1 n"m OF MAlq/COM(21 T IX TTA tle.e III 1 . - ' 0161 w. I.r.tn111 b1W. Cky vp C-6 ca� 91730 h"nT =I s L..ilp._rifw 21 -171909 +• c F -- � ve[ w M .I I.'\ M M tl.Pw -r M li AA/ wl q... (.1 MAN w� rrpr .yM./ M w�. 9e.M Ir..tw..t0 M...1 h pNfulrr M . iow, rJ 11 STAR d CA2P0O0A Cwr[M 9/11 n - .r. = rrr.r rr rr r1 rr ..A r/ .. • r �- y .Mr. =�.r Y r W err w r r.r... �.M�. W. r r rrV -✓•` r 'iY+ r -�M Y �YYw w .r. i rrrr r.n.r.-r \r�rrM ..r M.Ir.r./.ryr rrrr.r�. .w r r.r.�urr.r r,.. r.rr..�rr ,- ,r•,+•ny. 1 .. w.. .. r . r I4 A ] mul IGII M![[ r I APPNtAT1ON BY TRMSM02 11 PAR p [uuoolu Cw N bll�dl eltn Ow + /5in ..w wr r ...............r r.•.....r.......rr r..... ��� ... r .r.., . r ..� -...r . r �.. I.,•r r.. r � I-•rr. r......... aw .rr.1 r r. r nrr rr r r .ra m .. r r+..+..rwr \ ..rr r ..ar .ten w .+.. w ��. � w r rr. r. r \rr ...... r r +r...•r r rr.rA .rlrYrrrrM rww�le ww .rrr .r.+rrwr.. +IrYr rw..M r...�rirr- W =X:7.rn.. r rr.r.w....r T.r. r w \� r .'.•.. hV. Y..I�. r Ds Nd PM1Oe Prir T64 LMl fw Wpelvd Vr OrP O CO.RS .IArtfD +•yu FOOTHILL LIQUORS ,IP' 8161 Foothill Bird. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Currently Zcned: General Commerical Zoning of Adjacent Properties: North; Commerical South; Commerical /Office East Commerical West Commerical APNO 207 - 113 -11 by Torrez, Joe 19 JULY 1988 in a !Y I),- torLMARCN MW AICCMONC fr p7rrrl of Ak i k 9. C. W 1"I b."ee, d da[wedlm Sr,arr. C. L MIS ..w.rr... w..rr n...tw+f•.d S..+r.ffAa lr fredn.i.ds41... t. TTR(s) co 11CtfOUf1 1Yl n0. Oft LY AtQt t "In AfydM rdtr Fc 240" en.... o.t. I..u. C QCf11 FS'a OloOS/f1.CAl COOL 1615 �.. W — Z nAwdm OF Afnr.ANrIA .4 nrr ed.e.. orr C.bnt Y rbr.I .31d L TTKM a NANUCTIOt % M TTIe TY .e. s u.rw to e. tYr..I a —P - �aJys:. 1 It.x.Wtr.er.ad f..N %fl feniN.s center Do. dt.. O O/ W DI C.d. G wry TOM S 1. "? tr4- r S r T N rd' 3Y- 3!1142 Cti 1 ? t�� F Meal Adds • d 60rrl4.. f� l V. Il. M..r M.at n.le.d N.IrWfT 14n... I.. w.binM .•TMMVrw.•. NMA4.lrt f.•.•..• CsrY b r I.fvl.AUr N Ae D..r.••r.t ..F ND. inw.wMAtt/ Y . S.1. t. if STAR W CAO1pttM CwnN N _`c ^S_MfMIIIIO¢...__ -0.�.. • T'7_aA w..... r...... w.. .r..ra..r..r....... +�......n... r... rr...... rr.�.. ....r. w.. .UC . / t I SICM Y{Q r. AHIICATION my TWdSMOA M STAR CO WI-ZnA C+.Nr +— .- 3u.�ua.s •�_ dw_.1/.1 - -- .'�:.s.�..r�w.�..r�.wwMi... r....w w..r..r r. .. ..w. �. w..... De Na Wa. Mar TW U." P. DrprtwrN UK O+f An.t6h C f.tttd.d..dt., C nd"Ir1 °'OrA Conn MAJtW C rrr., 4rYi•Iw.! .,.N Odlt♦w .arit..���. •.r r. r. tlV t • kFO • !Z.na� E E 6u—m s; cahmm D m__1 H= a THE LUNCH SHOP 9631 Business Center Drive, Ste. G Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Currently Zoned: General Industrial, Sub -area 3 I.A.S.P. Z;ming of Adjacent Propee -les; North: Office Professional /Residential iledium South: General Industrial East : General Cocmerical /existing Schools /Medium Residential West : General Industrial APNI 209- 021 -38 by Torrez. Joe 19 JULY 1983 I• yF r fi- ca b r- v c M — CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT'' DATE: August 3, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer SUGIECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the Via Carrillo Drive Improvement Project, from Avenida Vejar to East of Sierra Madre Avenue to be funded from Grants C.D.B.G: Account No. 28- 4133 -8704 RECOMEHOATION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Via Carrillo Drive Improvement Project from Avenida Vejar to east of Sierra Madre and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids ". BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by ir.- house design, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $175,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 9, 1988 and Ruqu st 16, 1988, with the bid opening on Tuesday, August 23, 19825, at 2:30 P.N. Respectf bmitted, RHN:4L:jh / Attachment i { RESOLUTION N0. 8 D' 147 S- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "VIA CARRILLO DRIVE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT', FROM AVENIDA VEJAR TO EAST OF SIERRA MAORE AVENUE, IN SiID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain i3provements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and s;ecifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby cpprove' as the plans and specifications for 'VIA CARRILLr. rAUVE IIPWWEMXT PWJEC.°. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 1s hereby authorized and dhr -cted to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, wnlch said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices o: the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:30 o'clock P.N. on the 23rd day of August 1988 sailed bids or proposals for the 'VIA CARILLO DIIYVE- 1MPR0YE)ENf- PI®,IECTt in said City. Bids wili be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the _ City of Rancho Cucamonga, C "lifornia, marked, 'Bid for Construction of 'VIA CARRILLO DRIVE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of at similar character in the lw.elity in which the public work is performed, aid not less than the general prevailing rate of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the D9 Diraetor of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such pyrevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City 61erk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, s Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,cob site. The Contractor shall 7orfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars (325.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day nr portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s paid less than the general prevailing r' rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. 'n accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 z of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing trado4man in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When tho trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or C. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. T iS M The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeyman in any apyrenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the pubic works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777,5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wago schedules, and other requ,resrents �y be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officto the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) ho,!rs of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of tills contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Cade of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic remployed in the executio;, of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under im" any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer woi #man, or mechanic is required or pemitted to labor more than eight (81 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labe Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ton percent (10s) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash. cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract: to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (10D%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent 330 t (50s) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment Of clams for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any,iwrk or labor of any kind done thereon, and the °Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between his and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal fora has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor Contractor) in accordance ncewith the sProvisions nof then Contractor' License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et, seq.) and rules awarded. nd regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the tine time this contract is a specificationssof to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on f11ei1nsthe Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road. Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, w111 be furnished uppon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 530.00 said 130.00 is nonrefundable. Uppon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed Men said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of SiS.00 to cover the cost of seflfng charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirement; of 8tction 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractors request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to rete9t Any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 31 DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: n,mv no n A Ain an rl rr A MnNr A STAFF REPORT August 3, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer Authorize the advertising of the °Notice Inviting Bids' for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue Improvement Project, to be funded from TDA/Article 8 Account No. 12.4637 -8824 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue Improvement Project, to be funded from TDA/Article 8 Account No. 12- 4637 -8824 and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the Notice Inviting Bids °. BACKGROUND/AMALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have brm completed by Austin Foust Associates, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $83,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 9th and August 16th with the bid opening at 2:00 P.M. on August 26, 1988. Res p submitted, �� RHH:JL:jh _ Attachment F w RESOLUTION N0. 8O — y 7 q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain i q)rovements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamong be and are hrreby approved as the plans and specifications for 'Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 1s hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS- Pursuant to a Resolution of Council Of San Bernardino County, California,adirecting thisenotice, NOTICE IS Cucamon GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamongga . on or before the hour of 2 :00 o'clock P.M. on the 26th day of August 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue' in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made or, a form prnvided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, 'Bid for Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing Direttorpof the Department rk. In that the State ofaCalifornia wo is required to and has Prevailing such general prevailing rates of per diem office such of then City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 BaselLine Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. 2 CucamongContractor iveadolldrse(S25aoo ) efor ea h to the laborer,, workman,wor mechanic employed for each Calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, wages heereinbe mechanic is forsanyaworkedoneeunder theiattached contract, by him or by arty subcontractor under him, in violatfon of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California appprentfceshfp Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed to the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or arty subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprentfceable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the hhppublic works project and certificcaateiof approval. Tawieertificaterw111nalsoatftrade for ao of apprentices to journeymen that will ba used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship comet ^.tee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or D. When the 'umber of apprentices in training in the area excea•is a ratio of one to five, or C When the trade can show chat it 1s rep +acing a; lei :: 11,,,0 of its P—�Oerrhl,l tr, o:.g% apprenticeihlp traii,ir; on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he empioys registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less - than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs If he employs registered apprentices or journeymen to any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public wo% site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprentfceshfp standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 3y .r Eight labor constitute a tthhesContractoraand any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articie 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (81 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If bidder,ttheCammoount of the contract to the next by tthe City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the lase bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The cont actafornsaid work shallobe onevhundred percentf(100s)lofetthe contract the price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (505) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for tho performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor) tin accordance e with thesprovisionsn0f thenContractor's rLicense Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and 3S Yny: lit specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the Plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00, said $35.00 is nonrefundable. UVVon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accomppanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of S15.00 t^ cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the fequirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractors request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 3rd day of August, 1908. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 3rd day of August, 1980. ATTEST: er ADVERTISE ON August 9th August 16th or r ,Y i F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a. STAFF REPORT � DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager WX FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Jnel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Archibald Avenue Widening Improvement Project between Highland Avenue to Lemon Avenue to Bob' Britton Company, Inc:, for the amount of $124,925.15, to be funded from Systems Development Fund, Account Nn. 22- 4637 -8755 RFLOMMIDAITIOM: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Archibald Avenue Widening Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Bob Britton Company Int., for the amount of $124,925.15. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bid: were solicited, received and opened on July 22, 1988, for the subject project. Bob Britton Company Inc., is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid asount of $124,925.15 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $168,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Res f tted, Attachmen cc: Purc _ 3� PROJECT ARCHIBALD AYEMUE NIOENINS LOCATION: HI179.W MAR: m LEHOM AY'EIRIE F ' Bob Brttto0. Inc. '. SLOMY• rg TOTAL"SM OF BID ($I 5121.925.15 G� CITY OF BARCHO CIGNIOM6A SWW.Y OF PROPOSALS OPLNED EMGIREM'S ESTIMATE: S16e.00o.00 CONTRACT July 22. 1946 Laird Cost, 6 -1 Enterprises JEi. Conair. Yana Corp, CGH Canstr. $132.155.97 $179.151.42 $148.066.65 $1 49.670.00 $157.807.01 CIO �ir'�kv �nlr•:a':Y.` 4�J]l NYC a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, C4ty Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Real Pro porty Lprovement Contract and Lien Agreement from Beverly Fishback and release of sass from James A. and Beverly Fishback for a single family residence, located on the north side of Victoria street, east of East Avenue RECOMIEMBATION: It acceptingcomhendsubjecct Real i Property11Iaapdrovesent attached Contr resolutions Agreement and releasing the previously accepted Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing same to record. Background /Ana', s At 0, dune 15, 1983, council meeting, the City accepted a Real Property I,,,ovement Contract and Lien Agreement for improvements adjacent to Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 7852. The correct parcel was Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 7852. The attached resolutions accept the lien on Parcel 2 and release the lien previously placed on Parcel 3 AB. Resl s bmitted, — Attachment 37 r .ti a, s i RESOLUTION NO. d A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM BEVERLY FISHBACK AND AUTHORIZING a THE MAYOR A.YD CITY CLERK TO SIGN rdE SAME Ordinance No.58,onhFebruary 21c11979,tto establisharEqufCrementangtoradopted construction of public 1provarents in Conlunctfon with building pemit issuance; and NHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter sid8dewalk and pavement ParceliMap 7852 has prerequisite by Issuance Into auiRealnProperty Improvement Contract of Contract and Lien Agreement by Beverly Fishback. Rancho Cucamon��a0ifornialdoess accepttsaid Council of improvement Contract of Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County I Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. i� at RESOLUTION N0. £j'� - Ll $ ' CUC I CALIFORNEIAI q�WNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO .j `t IMPRUDENT AND LIEliING A REAL PROPERTY AND BEVERLY FISNBACK AGREEMENT FROK JAt7E5 A 1' e Resolution o.88j.t City Council Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Agreement from Janes Accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien and Beverly Fishback; and WHEREAS. was recorded offic all Prdierly Improvement Contract and Lien A November 22, I983. as Records No. 83 ty. Californla�eoevent X75552; and required. "EREAS' said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer NON, THEREFORE eeerebylel�eysaid Real p City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga d and Lien Agreement and that the C1ty Clerk shall cause Release wnt Contract recorded in the office oP the the reau v I Californian Recorder of San Bernardino County, Y/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , r� V-- 7l� yy r v•rt• N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT oat--: August 3, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer w: Subject: A oroval of an Amendment to an Improvement Agreexnt with Marjorie C.fBoesen of Cucamonga th Am thyst Clarke enue Reconstruction at 19th Street, to clarify future street improvement requirements for Nineteenth Street along the Boesen's property frontage. REci c"TIOM: It is recommended Uiat City Council approve an Amendment to an Boeseneandt MarjorrienC. 8oesen for the Amethyst AvenuenReconstruction at 19th Street, to cla -lfy future street improvement requirements for Nineteenth Street along the Ooesen s property frontage. BACKGROIRD /AMALTSIS- On July 6, 1988, an Agreement for Installation of Improvement and brdication was duly approved by the City Council and recorded in the Records Office of San Bernardino County for the subject project. To guarantee the City future opportunity to modify the present design and protect the present owners, an Amendment to the Aggreement was prepared. The Amendment provides that the City will not lspose or levy future street improvement requirements, so long as the present owner owns sold real property, and does not materially alter the current use of said property, cr, until the Agreement my be further amended, by both parties. Respect s fitted, / �// HHk:JL :pea Attachment Y 3 t Y C RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY`OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•APPROVING THE AMENWNT•TO AGREEMENT-WITH CLARKE H. BOESEN AND MARJORIE C. BOESEN FOR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FOR AMETHYST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT NINETEENTH STREET Cucamonga Agreement for Inssttaallation of PublicCouncil ImprovRements and DDeedicationaperoCOd88 the -097 on July 6, 1988; and Marjorie C. BoesenEhave aya reed to amend t Agreement for thesreason of clarifying the future improvement requirements related to the Boesen's frontage; City of RanchoNCucamong ,OUlifornia,Rdoes�approvetthe AmendAnt tolAgreement of Installation of Improvemert Agreement and Dedication, and directs the city Clerk to record swe in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino, California. i� M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT``` Date: August 3, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subiect: Approval of an Amendment to an Improvement Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and William 11. Lane and Janet W. Lane for the Amethyst Avenue Reconstruction at 19th Street, to clarify future street improvement requirements for Nineteenth Street along the Lane's property frontage. RECBM 0MTIOW: It is recommended that City Council approve an Amendment to an Improvement Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and William H. Lane and Janet W. Lane for the Amethyst Avenue Reconstruction at 19 %` Street, to clarify future street improvement requirements for Nineteen. Street along the Lane's property frontage. BADUOI 1D /AWALYSIS• On Dedication6.was9duly an approve by the City Council and rem ded in the Records Office of San Bernardino County for the subject pro,4,ect. To guarantee the City future opportunity to modify the present design and protect the present owners, an Amendment to he Agreement was Prepared. The Amendment provides that the City will not impose or lei, future street improvement requirements, so long as the present owner owns said real property, and does not materially alter the current use of the property, or, until the Agreement may be further amended, by both parties. Res tfu submitted, r / RNM:J Attachment /� RESOLUTION NO. 0 b -q- ;3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM H. LANE AND JANET W. LANE FOR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVMMT AND DEDICATION FOR AMETHYST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT NINETEENTH STREET e WHEREAS, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga had approved the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvements and Dedication per Co 88 -097 on July 6, 1988; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and William H. lane and Janet W. Lane have agreed to amend the subject Agreement for the reason of clarifying the future improvement requirbeents related to the Lane's frontage; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamong, California, does approve the Amendment to Agreement of Installation of Imoprovment Agreement and Dedication, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino, California. M __ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval and execution of Agreements for Engineering Services for Map and Plan Checking with C G Engineering, Derhish, Guerra and Associates, end Don Creek and Associates for FY 1988 -89 RECOMMENDATION: It is recomended that the City Council approve the subject contracts with C G Engineering, Derbish, Guerra, and Associates and Don ;reek and Associates and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Staff has received and reviewed Contracts for Engineering Services for Hap and Plan Checking for FY 198849 from the following three consulting firms: Oerbish, Guerra and Associates of Rancho Cucamonga C G Engineering of San Bernardino Don Greek and Associates of Orange The maximum charge for plan checking to reflects the actual cost of providing the services. It is proposed to utilize all plan checkers to the same extent to provide timely and high quality plan checking at all times. Copies of the Contracts are available in the office of the City Clerk. Respectfu submitted, dB-d1w Y— Attachment /7 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF' REPORT ' a\ tVa:.. A 0.47E August 3, 1888 TCt Mayor and Members of the City Council is FRCM Jerry S. Fuiwood, Director of Resource Services BY, Thomas Smibula, Data Processing Coordinator SUBJECT, Aoomvni to examlte mnfM& Mr Amt. mme,nn. t.�,d,,.,,.....,.o.,........._ ...,,. REDONMENM Staff recommends that City Council approve the execution of the replacement contract with Computedand of Upland for Apple computer maintenance In the total amount of $6,652. EACKGW. ND-' The computer maintenance contract from Computedand of Redlands was approved by City Council on July 20, 1888. However, Computodand of Redlands made significant changes In management and staff due to a reorganization which will nut allow them to provide the maintenance at the contract price of $5;334. Therefore, Computodand of Upland as the second I.aost bidder at $6,052 can provide the necessary service. Currently the Apple computers at the City are not under any maintenance agreement and this can prove vory costly if a computer wore to malfunction. Respectfully submitted, J Al. /rry Director of Resource Services JBF:TSzgr Attachment 7o a r—r. C !ti 3 PRICE 6 MAC US W /40 MOB H.D. & COLOR MONITOR $692.00 EA. 3 LASERWP,ITER H NTS $512.00 EA. I LASERWRnER PLUS $512.00 EA. I MACNTOSH SE H.D. 20 $352.00 EA. TOTAL: $6652.00 Dear Sandy, These prices include on -site repair of the above listed computers and parts replacement at no cost. The average response time is twelve hour: from the time we receive your call. Except that parts not be available the units will be repaired on location. I believe that you will find our service excellent because of the fact that we have two full time service technicians both with outstanding credendals. Thank you for the chance to quote you on your service needs and I look forward to doing business with you in the future. Sincerely, �Q/r'✓r!Cit �� Darren Enscoe Senior Systems Consultant i Y 9y f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: August 3, 1988 Tot Mayor, city council and city Manager From: Joe Schultz, community Services manager By: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator Subject: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Security for Construction of Kenyon Park as Recorded on Tract Map 13442 and Vintage Park as Recorded on Tract Hap 13445 It is recommended that the city Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement and security documents. Located within the vineyard section of the Victoria Plan community Development are two neighborhood parks shown on Exhibit A. They were conditioned to be constructed as part of the Planned Community as approved by city Resolution 81- 37. The conceptual plan for these parkaf Exhibit B, Kenyon Way Park and Exhibit C, Vintage Park, were conceptual approved by city council on October 7, 1987. The developer, William Lyon Company has formulated a set of Plans and Specifications for the project that meets City approval. The developer is now submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the improvements. The amount for each park is: Faithful Performance Bond: $560,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $280,080.00 _ Copies of the Agreement and Security are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, Joe Schultz Community Services manager JS:DL:tp Enclosure - Resolution Exhibit A - Victoria Vineyards North Davolo Exhibit B - Kenyon Way Park Conceptual Plan Exhibit C - Vintage Perk Conceptual Plan i KE rtr tl'� PAILC• u`C•1 {Cbt,'" t - -.._ . • - - ---•- --- - ,A �yq 1 j° � i ` ` 1 \4 1 i : �-- ?E`�'�sr'i.° .cd' �%Ii.YO�v'+....�'h'.f+w�*— ,°`-'.`�q'^Q.�•" -'� u y` Y r.:..,,ri' c•5 �'Y ^�M�St!>".� _ �� ` '�_� 4 i �J� PF'NxI l; EXHIBIT A ■ 39.x� ENYON WAY PARK LANNING AREA N0. A ®PLIA A IN��'.E1ARD S .. TII WILLIA;11'�. L-70N COIIII ?�1N �Q��� /K.�- NO��i*c c�o+ttrt�nm cowl EXHIBIT B .y . 'C J yY 3 I V1119 1 AUL FAKK PLANNING AREA NO. XII A%ICTORIA ATIN NTARDS NORTH fps TII11 ILL7�NLYON COM] ANY 11 Io EXHIMT C +H ""'t 15L ii I nn.+ccI[XM ..... ^.��' —.. - - unfit ., RESOLUTION NO.nQ� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVDMEHT AGREEENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR KENYON WAY PARK TRACT 13442 AND VINTAGY. PARK TRACT 13445. California, n has fors its Council d of Can Improvement Agreement executed on., 1988, by The William Lyon Company an developer, for the improvement of Kenyon Way and Vintage Parke specifically described therein, and generally located in the Vineyards Development of the Victoria Plan co ®unity; and said Ism movement installation of such improvements, doscribad in P Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done to accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement in secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which in identified in said Improvement Agreement. City Of Rancho Cucamonga, Calif rni% the that tsaid�Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hareby approved and :he Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement on behalf Of the City of Rancho Cuczmonga, and the City Clark to attest thereto. 5/ CITY OF RANCHO CCCAIIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1980 , TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Accept the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenut and Civic Center Drive Improvement Project as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of fom�letion" and approve the rinal contract amount of $78,000. RECO PUNTIOM: It is Safety Ligh�tinge at HaveneAvenue CandiCivice accept Center Traffic Signal and Project as complete. authorize the City Engineer to file a ''Notice of Completion ", and authorize the release of the Faithful Perforownce Bond in the amount of $70,762.00 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of 57,800.00 fir one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $3,895.37 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $3S,381.00, 35 days after the recordatio $7 n of said notice if claims have been recei S78,G00.00. ved. Also, approve the final contract amount of Backgruund /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. order final for d tionalm conduit fand�In.ter ally includes inated minor street change e signs. The original amount approved by Council was $70,762.00, and the revised amount to be approved By Council is $78,000.00. 4 sD submitted. :sd cc: Purchasing S6 M�, • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OFoTHE,CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, 'ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEWXTS FCR TRAFFIC SIGNAL-AND SAFE-( LIGHTING AT HAYEH,AVENuE AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AW AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COWLETION FOR THE WORK - WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tj afffc Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive have b completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and c I eted WHEREAS, a Notice of CoWletion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be It resolved. that the work Is ;Wreby accepted and the City Engineer Is allthorfzed to sign and file Notice a of Coapletton with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. W Y �1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT BATE: August 3, 1988 T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer w' Accept the Etiwanda Cobblestone Curbs Improvement Project as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion' and approve the final contract amount of $56,491.84. RECONOWTIOM: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Etiwanda Cobblestone Curbs Improvement Project as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion', and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $28,238.50 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of $5,649.18 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $26,238.50 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $14,119.25, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $56,491.84. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is $56,491.84 which includes 1 change order to be appproved by council for reconstruction of on -site improvements. The original amount approved by Council was $28,238.50 and the revised amount to be approved by Council is $56,491.84. Respectfully submitted, n Attachment 57 M RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF'THE.CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS• FCR THE ETIWANDA C08BLESTOME CURBS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETIOR FOR THE WOPX -,i WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Etiwasda 5 Cobblestone Curbs Improvement Protect has been completed to the satisfaction of the City ingineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. V I` Date: To: From: By: Subject: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 3, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Ken Fung, Assistant Civil Engineer Approval of the Environwntal Initial Study, Parts I and II for the pproposed Etiwanda Area I and II Street Rehabilitation and adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor RECDSMwTiDH- It 1s hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution aceepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Etivanda Area I and II Street Rehabilitation and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKGRDHND /AMId.TSIS: This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Etiwanda Area I and II Street Rehabilitation. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above - mentioned improvements. Said project entails the rehabilitation and repair of local streets. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project x111 not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Res ec f V u suboltted, RH .pages Attachment 4 - 59 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF �t RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE- ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EMOTION FOR THE PROPOSED INNADA AREA S. I AND II STREET REHABILITATION reviewed all available inputiccooncerning thetproposed Etfwanda has Street Rehabilitation; and and WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; WHEREAS, an Environmental Assess " nt Initial Study has been- Prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. i N0', THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION Council of Rancho af 9 grlap proves the EnvironvKssiesmetInialStudy and issuance oaCateoc Exemption for the proposed Ettwanda Area I and II Street Rehabilitation. Exemption pursua-W -E 2: Clerk is directed it file a of �0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PART I 6ENEM For All protects reQuirtng environmental nviar, this torn must be completed the and sutmltttd to tha r)avelopment Reytar Coawlttue through the department where pro Planning Ofvtsslonlstaff w111 made. Upon receipt of thfs application, the enOf three gene to Planning Caslsafon.PaThe P1ann/ngaCaraalsslantudy and will-make one viroment�lt t p1 ct and a tiegattve Oetlaratlon will baeefl no Si niffcant The project Report have a significant envlronmentr,l 1a4aet and an Envlromrental Shine Report Will be prepared, or (3) M additional tnfornavir report Should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date F1 Project Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone City of Rancho Cucamonca 9320 Base nine ra o171A Name. Address, Telephone of Concerning this Profeet: e Location of Assessor's Parce} No.: List other pern ss ufng necessary from local, regional, such permits: state and federal agencies and the agency lss (P r r14 `i 11011cr VESCRIPT"N Proposed use or proposed project :y,,,� slum seal " Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, If any: ROUE Describe the envfromantal settfn of the pro act site including information an topography, —501"1"1 a y, pints (trees), land antarals an historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding y cultural, sheertpptlon of any existing structures and their use Properties, and the Shlet3J:t��R� ", r ", r•," ,ti r.ru r (Attach necessary N— �'�t�hlch eprya saStAnnM 1 it le n ni It h1 to a gets are knmm to on er naa. tha rnaA rn h habiltta tad Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental fmpact wu k a" MILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO I. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? 3. Create a substantial change in demand far municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? S. Remove any existing trees? Now many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fl amables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: 10. If the project Involves the . Construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page CERTIFIC11TI0M: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date:�� Signature Title Assistant Civil Enoineer _ 1p 3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION :'' The following information should be provided to tha City of Rancho Cucamonga e Planning Division In order to' aid the school district to assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. developers are required to secure letters from the school district for aeeonmodating the x increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: ;_ PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TO_ TAL k 1. Number of single family units: u. 2. Number of multiple family units: ,r 3. Date proposed to -- ,, begin construction: 4. Earliest date of -- Occupancy: Model/ 4 Ind / of Tentative 5. Bedrooms price Rama ■i o: 1 V a c r" c MAN; a CITY 07 JLMCHO 0C.1-1tw A PART 12 - INITIAL Sn'OY ENPIRONHENIAL mrcr IST DATE: APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cuctmonca FILI:7C DATE: LOC NMSERs PROJECT: _ Ettwanda Araa t and IT c rp }-Rehab111tatton PROJECT LOCATION: EtlNanda_Area i and II I. MMIRMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all ^Fes" and ^maybe^ answers are required on attached shat ti) . 65 YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and 0t010av- Will the proposal have significant rasulcs in: A. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? -_ b. Disruptions, displaasents, compaction or burial of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? �— x d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? a• Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? " f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? A- S. Expopure of people or property to geologic hazard such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase In the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hvdrology. Will the proposal have signifit.it results in: 65 a. Change In the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number Of any species of plants? _ x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare r or endangered species of plants? _ x 6 6 : Ms �* ,�_. A. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing screams, rivers, or ephemeral atrau channels? b. &ansas in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water Y runoff? x - "' c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood i V, waters? y9 d. Change in the amount of surface water in any s body of water? x z e. Discharge Into surface waters, or any 'S alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? S. Change in the quantity of groundvaters, either through direct additions or with - ,� dravals, or through lnterferancs with an aquifer? Quality? ;.; Quantity? h. She reduction In the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? x r I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding of seiches? _ x tI 1. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results ins s a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? _ x Stationary sources? x b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? x c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movament, moisture or temperature? 4. Since Flora. _ W111 the proposal have significant results In: a. Change In the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number Of any species of plants? _ x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare r or endangered species of plants? _ x 6 6 : 62 't YES WY1_ no c. Introduction if new or disruptive Species of =o plants into an area? F+ d. Reductioh in the Potential for agricultural Production? ?` Fauna. Will the propossl'have significant results In: a. Change in the characteristics of species, +. including divarsiey, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? F b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animaLs1 t' t. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or moveesnt of amisals? _ �- X d. Deterioration or raseval of existing fish or ✓ wildlife habitat? X S- Paaulation. Vill the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ X b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a damand for additional housing? _ -_ x 6. Soclo- Lconooit Factors. Will the proposal have siinitieesc results int A. Change is local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including sconoeic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? 1 b. Will project costs be equitably distributed aamng project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax Payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the Proposal have signiticanc raeulca in? a A subecantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? _ X b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plant of any governaantal oncittes? — X_ c. An l=Pacc upon the qulaity or quantity of axiscing tonsu =ptiva or non - consumptive recreational oppoccunicies? x 62 �j n� .tAYlE •%J -, -• �, 8- iransbortation. Will the proposal have significant ti results ins a. Caneration of substantial additional vehicular obvementS x _ b. Effects on existing screen, or danand for nev street construction? „. c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new, parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing crane porca- p: tion system? •- Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or affects on present and y potential voter- horse, rail, mass transit or air traffic? s. Incrusts in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X tv i 9. Cultural Resources. Vill the proposal have significant results lot • a. A disturbance to the integrity of arcYsaologtcsl, Dalsoncological, and /or historical resources? _ X 10. Heair,. Safety, and ttuissnte IIactors. Will the proposal have signl.flesne zuulu ins a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ _r X c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances Sn the avant of an accident? _ J_ d. M increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenle _ organisms or the exposure of people to such organises? _- a. Increase in existing noise levels? X f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? - - i z. The creation of obleccionabla odors? h• M increase in light or glare? 4 w r' r_ YES "A_�3S %0 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results ins A. Do ebitruction or degradation of any scenln vise+ or view? — b. She creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridorb? 12. Utilities and 7ublie Setvlee�, Will the proposal have a signs ivae need for new a;aceeu, or alterations to the fo?lovlcsi a. Electric paver? _ - -- x b. Nstdral or packaged gut C. Comunleaticas Mtsaa? d. Water supply? . e. Wastewater facilities? 1. Flood control siructcremt S. Solid waste faeilitles, — h. Fire protection? I. Police protection? — X �. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facllitiest 1. Maintenance of public facilities, Including roads and Mod control facilities? s. Other governmental services, - 13. Pne"M and Scarce Resources. es. Will the prop0sal have -A ignificant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? 1 b. Substantial increaue in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An lacrease or perpetuation of the consumption of non- renowable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? r_ t, �4 a. Substantial depletion of any coorenswable or scarce natural resour"? 14. Ntnd• tor, rindines of Slani lic��nte. a. Does tbs project have the potential to degrade the gwality of the aevironsent, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species . Ccause a fish or wildlife- popu3aclon to drop self sustaining_ lsvels, threaten to eliminate a p1inC•or anidal�eassur4iy, rvduce�. the number or._restrict- tt,a aadanEend),pr_inc or an sangs'of a rare or Laal or "Imitate important ex""Iss of the major rarlods of California history or prehistory? b• Does the project have the poeent"I to achieve short -tera, co the disadvantage , environment of long -coral onvir"taa short-tcal 10418? (A sherm Impact on the environment is one whie4 occurs in a relatively brief, definitive parloo of time while lang- tat7 impacts will endure wall Into the future). C. Dols the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerahle? (Cumulatively considerable means that the locrasantal effaets ar an Individual project ore considerable wham viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). ._ X d. Does the project have aavlronmen:al alfacts which will cause substantial adverse affects on "'r-an beings, althor directl^ or Indirectly? II. DISC:SSIDN or I EVALVATTO, o of the above ququestions pl a discussion of(propased ml At1v4 tfra answers to ) 76 fff� PAS~ °tY3'' "�O• I Ky ry uyFp 7c I ._ X d. Does the project have aavlronmen:al alfacts which will cause substantial adverse affects on "'r-an beings, althor directl^ or Indirectly? II. DISC:SSIDN or I EVALVATTO, o of the above ququestions pl a discussion of(propased ml At1v4 tfra answers to ) 76 fff� III. DCTE.y�2NAT20N - - On the basis of this Initial evaluation: OI land the proposed project COULD NOS have a, ai`n!Llcanc effect Oft the envlranme. and a CATEGORICAL EXFVTIIM will be prepared. 2 find that although the proposed project could have a Significant effect an the environment, than viii not be a eianifleane ifican Sa ehls cave because the Itltaaclon an ur a described on an, attached sheet have been added to the project. A NECATriE DECI.IRATSON WWII, BE ?WARID. I find the proposed project NAY have a aljnifleaat eLLeee on the envlrcyot, and an LNVINO.'VWT WALT UPORT is required. Date % z�9 k 7t/ Hry/ Acura c as< {«an P1v. i�oineer Title a a r •— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 3, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval Of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts i and II for the proposed Via Carrillo Street Improvements from Avenida Vejar to Sierra Madre Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor RECOIMEWTIOM: It 1s hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and appproving the Environmental .nitial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Via Carrillo Street Improvements from Avenida Vejar to Sierra Madre Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Qaality Act. BACKGROW /AMALTSIS• This report presents an Environmental Asses swent Initial Study for the proposed Via Carrillo Street Improvements from Avenida Vejer to Sierra Madre Avenue. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Stata Guidelines, the attached document his been prepared to permit construction of the above - mentioned improvements. Said improvements generally entail the sidewalk installments, wheelchair ramps and driveway approaches and street lights. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the euvlrenment and therefore . recommend that these lmprovenents be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respe tf s bmitted, �Ac R ` Attachment - 7a- RESOLUTION NO. D 8 - C f qg A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROYING THE= ENYIRD)MUTAL'INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED VIA CARRILLO STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM AVENIDA VEdAR TO SICRRA MADRE AVENUEE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Via Carrillo Street Improvements; and and WHEREAS, said Improvements require an Environmental Assessment; WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as ascended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tho City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The City Council of the Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the rn—vTr—o-nin—enTal Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Via Carrillo Street Improvements. Exemption Section t e Clerk is of 73 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PART I 6EMMAL For all pprojects requlring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Otve)opment Review C=tee through the department where "On Planning O1vfslonistaff is made. Upon receipt of this aDDltcattan, the recommend Bete to Planning Ccrmffsslon .PaThelPlanntog9eCamnission twill make one en three determinations: (1) The project wfll have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The Impact will have a significant environmental tagect and an Environmental meld be suptedlby the An or giving furtheriinformlation concerning the Proposed Project. pli Date Project Title: yin Carrillo Street Improvements APPlicanNS Name, Address, Telephone: C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga corms ni v 0 r n 1n erin Division 9320 Base Line Rd. �p_Tb07 Rancho Cucamonga 4Y 9 u -u00 Name, Address, Telephone of Pe ^son To Be Contacted Concern lno th is D.e e...�. Location of Assessors Parcel. and List other, Permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies agency issuing such permits ,e PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project .•_Paverant rehabilitation sidewalks curb and quit t t t /gh+ t it I1 ti t Acreage of project area and square foot:,ge of existing and proposed buildings, if any:_y�f„eeA pyj + �(m+iely 1.7 a[rec Th r a e :lctind or proposed buiidinds Describe the environmental settin of the pro ect site including information On topography, so st Y. p ants (trees), land animals, any cultural, description oofsee�tnye ez1sC1ns, truetureso an their use roparties, and the sheets): g (attach necessary Th. c+ + h f Via ra ille ,nder rnnsideration is - primarily residential Tho "rain is relatively flat with a penile slope The unpaved shoulder a lot 'f addles. ECUs_ aa11e, trope driveways ware nut aligned aln rh street some nortionc -' the walls were found --4n inside the City right-of-way property P Y rM n r 5ldevalks were provided. Is the project part of a actio larger project, one of a series of cumulative ns, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental tmpae4 Ny`olect stands alone €e. V L�. 'P. m MILL THIS PROJECT- YES NO 1. Create a substantial change In ground contours? a° 2. Create a subitantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? X �' 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal t services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? �. 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? 4 _ x _ Explanation Of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: H/a 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project:__ _ H/p 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attachad exhibits present the data and information required for this initial -evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submi•:ted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date:, 7 — /xf -88 Signaturee� Title a . rt it F 01nPPr 7L ti ■, RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division to order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to kcomvdate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single �— family units: 2. Number of multiple -- family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model/ and 0 of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Prtc�nge 7% i CITY OF IANCHO CC A%!ONCA - PART II - INITIAL STCDY - w EHVIROM=AL CHEcrLIST DATE- ^ APPLICASTs rir a p �, rho r ra as y FILfiiC DATE: LD'. NUMBERS PROJECT:_ Via Carrillo PROJECT LOCATION:_ From Avenida Velar to Sierra Hadre I. NEZROMMNIAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and ^saybe^ ansysrs are required on attached Shasta). Y =S MAYBE NO 1. S0113 and Caoloev. Will the proposal have slgniacanc results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in aeologLC relationships? b. Disruptions, displacmancs, coapeetion or JI burial of the soil? _ x c. Change 13 topography or ground surfaca — contour Intervals? x d. The destruction, covering or =dification Of say unique _ geologic or physical features? e• Any potential Increase in wind or vacer eroaloa of soils, aftscclng either an or off site condiconst f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? S. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase In the race of extraction and /or use of any t:ineral resource? 2. Hvdroloa V -� v. 111 the proposal have significant x--. results in: - e7 /v i a• Changes in currents, or the SS kOf course of dirge ci flowing strums, rivers, or ephe_eral Channels! screen AM - b' +rases in absorption rata, drains or the race and amount of runoff: satiate vaceeacterns, ' c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood vacate! �— d* change in the amount Y .�y of surface water in any body of water! t •kt e. Ufa charge into surface waters, or a alteration of �— surface vatfr owlityty f• Alteration of groundwater characteristics! S. Change in the quantity of grou either through diraccadditionsdorcvith- drawals, or through interference aquifer! with am Quality! Quantity! h The reduction in the amount of vise available for vsupplies? Public water I- Exposure of people or property related hazards x— such as flooding oraseiches7 7. Air, lualicv. Will the proposal have significant results In: �— a. Constant or periodic air e218210ms from mobile or indirect sources! Stationary sources! b. Deterioration of Interference atheeatcaimnqualit x with applitand/or air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting -- L air movement, moisture or temperature! 4• Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results a• Change in the characteristics of species, includLng diversity, dlacrlbucion, or number If any species of plants! b• Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants! 7�7 r. YES `13 =_3_ s0 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of Plants Soto an area? d. Reductioh in the pocancial for agricultural pioducclon? _ x Fauna. W111 the propasal' have significant results Sni +; a. Change in the eharacceristics of species, including divarsity, distribution, or nvebers of any species of aniaala? S b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare � x " or endangered species of anlnals? .. Introduction of new or disnrycive species of ac.. animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movesent of aaiculst d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? x 3. Pcoulation. Will the Proposal have significant results Sni a. Will the proposal altar the location, distri- bucion, denalty, diversity, or growth race of the h=an population of an araat x b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housLag? _ x 6. Sotto- Economic Factor-. Will the proposal have significant results eat s. Change in IOCal or regional socio- ecanooic characteristics, including eccnoeic or co®ercial diversity, tat race, and property values? b. Will project coats be equitably distributed al ong Project beneficiaries, I.e., buyers, - tax Payers or project users? x 7. Land Use and Planning Consideraelens. Will the Proposal have signs Scant results ant a. A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies. or adopced plans of any govar=ancal encities? — c. M inpacc upon the qulatty or quantity of x- existing ccnstcpcLve or non - con ,,umpcive recreational opportunities? a '3d _ U =S PAY3E T;"YY 8. Tranao =len. W111 she proposal have significant resULta Inc a• Generation of substantial additional vehicular mevament? b. Effects an existing streets, or demand far new street construction? ' C. Effects oa "faring parking facilities, or demand for -A t new parking? ' d. Substantial lapaet upon eslating transports. clan &yoga=? — x a• Alterations to present yaeceras of elreula- ?ion � or Movemesc of yample and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects oa present and _ x -- potential water- borne, rail. Mass transit or air traffic? ' t' Increases In traffic hazards to motor vehicles, s bitytllsts or pedestrians? x 9. Cultural Resource_. Will the proposal hava algniticamt results in: j a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological. paleontological, and /or historical resources? 30. Wealth. Safaev and Wuisane• paetora. Will the r proposal have sigclticamc results tat a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hearth hazard? x b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? n. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous subataaaa in the event of as accident? _ d. An increase in the number of Sodividuaia or species of vector or pathenogenlc _ organtsms or the exposure of people to such organism? ,L. a. Inerass• in exlacing noise levela? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? _ � x 9, The creation of objectlt u',:e odors? _,— h. An increase in light or; are? _. x— U a' YES 111y3r No 11. Aestheties. WL11 the proposal have clgnificane results in: w '? a. The obstruction or degradation Of any scenic j. :r vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthacitally offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated i, or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal i have a significant need for new systa", or ;r alcarations to the following: a. Electric power? X b. Natural or packaged gam? x c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? x g. Solid waste facilities? _ x h. Fire protection? 1. Police protection? _ X J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational forIlities? x 1. Naintaaesee of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? _ L s. Other governmental services? _ i I]. Cnarev and Scarce Msoure to Will the propoesl have a1gnSLiunc results in: a Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _ -JL b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing 4 sources of energy? _ _- c. An increase in the demand far development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renwable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? x II. e• Substaatlal depletion of • so +carts mcu: al re2ouree7 °Y nonrenewable or 1<, lGnda to Ftndln e of SS atftcance, a• Dou the Project he reduce h. of cAe envlronnanene2al habitat at . subscanclalade cavas '`fish or vildlifeah or vild11fe op. I... eliminate tau if Bustalaini lava Population to d to the aumbera plan[ or a °l.aiseoehreacen ro p LPartantdesaAplas of �1 of rare ucs G1lforala history or 7 ehlatory?orloda of b. sho_ the project Bede the po [inclai to + x ^ace eavtra Ladvanta thieve • rarzontal goals? (A sbori_ of long -term, tale!, Pat,nlctvc period Occurs ime Ira w° relatively m SO 131 endure Well Into 110 long_ c• Does the Project the future). Individually have impacts which -� considerrlil�ced, but cWalatively means Chet the IncumulativelY considerable individual project +aenCal effects of an in eonosetlon With late effects table when d and Probable future projects). at Past project,, d* rich will rcawi substantial effects —� AWaa bein t+atlal adverse sifecta L +. either directly or Saditoto _ DISC:•SSIon of the above goes cl `Op w'Ri d �DA7I0 Qf (Pra•oaef affirmative + co Wsaon P anav taclon meaaurae). _ S3 - h -lit . Do the basis of this initial evaluations I find the proposed andjact 'XV1.3 d0T have a significance• feat. ' effect 7 on the envimr =snc, CA7i�YtP.f^�L FXE)d'''lUH -ill be 9 9 I find that a though the proposed project could have a significant Elaffect on the saviracasoc. there will not be a significant eEfaec in this case b0ausa the mitigatioo, caesuras described an an ac cached sheet have been added to the project. A NECATR'E, DECLAUTIC -4 V=-SE,PA.SPA=- anvirlasnc proposed and an Vmjp.OcC,= LMPACTaRE?08T +UacaQuirsdc on the 7 Date -7^ �� —g8 Sigcscure Agqnria t f1 11 F 4naar ' Title P r mm, , CITY OF RANCHO CUCA111ONGA -STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Etgineer BY: Steve M. 0f'.liland, Public Works InspecutE510EFS SUBJECT. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion J L. ,.]..Tljit. p Tne required street improvements for OR 86-12 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it Is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of_Completion and authoriae the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $446,000. Background /Analysis OR 86 -12 - located on the south side of Arrow Highway, east of Hadrane Avenue DEVELOPER: Arrow Apartrent Associates 9701 Wilshire Boulevard /840 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $446,000 Respectf.rlly submitted, :SMG: ' - Attachment 1 4 •y . A K I'm j MEN r 0 t �y w� �E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CULAIMU, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROMIENfS FOR DR 86-12 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF .: COMPLETION FOR THE V WHEREAS, the construction of public i2provements for DR 86-12 have I been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and _ WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. is V ll b ,r. a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 T0: Ciy Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect�� SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECDMME WTIDM: The required street improvements for DR 86 -38 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $11,500. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS DR 86 -38 - located on the north side of Jersey Boulevard east of Utica Avenue. DEVELOPER: Barton Development 10621 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $11,500 Respec f ;WItted. i RIgi:SMG: w Attachment RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO - CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86 -38 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for OR 66 -38 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and 4 the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager � 5w, FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto�lG SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The repuired street improvements for Parcel Map 9829 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said loprovements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f88,G00. Background /Analysis Parcel Map 9829 - located on the northwest corner of Spruce and Elm Avenues DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $80,000 RespectfuHl,%submitted, RHM: Attachment p / 0f �e RESOLUTION N0. 89 - t C' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY >7UNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP'9829 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Nap 9829 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ra v� Y1 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAA1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 �1- TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H.,Maguire, City Engineer 4V: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Harks Inspect.�<' SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion REC0PMEATIOM: The required street improvements for DR 86 -15 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvementS, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 511,000. Background /Analysis DR 86 -15 - located south side of Aspen Street between Red Oak Street and Utica Avenue. DEVELOPER: Alliance Partners 337 North Vineyard Avenue #400 Ontario, CA 91764 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $11,000 Respect f submitted, it �s '$�IM�jdllsA� Attachment 9� ti• �r �4 t• � t T RESOLUTION NO. 8 a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFrRANCHO ` CU:AJQNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROYEMENTS KR DR 86 -15 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILIhc OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 86 -15 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and = WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. " NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. a; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 10277 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $2,505, authorize the City Cngineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $25,056. Background /Analysis Tract 10277 - located on the north side of Almond street, east of Carnelian Avenue DEVELOPER: King Ranch Estates 8560 Vineyard Avenue /510 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $2,505 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $25,056 — - Resp t y subiftted, RHM: Attachment q3 r ♦i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ' CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROYEIM(TS r FOR TRACT 10277 ANO.AUTNORIZVIG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 10277 have _r been completed to the'aatisfaction of the City Engineer. and WHEREAS, a Kotice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work couplete. NOW. THEREFORE, be it rasolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Record!r of San Bernardino County. z r t n r Nil � — CiTY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA STAFF REPORT ^ "' DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manger FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectea4G SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12740 located on the south side of Arrow Highway west of Center Avenue RE&IP MDATION: It is recommended that the' City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Deer Creek Parnters 145 West Main Street Tustin, CA 92680 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $20,500 MRes , su witted, RHM:SMG:dlw - 9s F i r E r s 5 t. Recommendation• It is recommended that City Council authorize the Community Services Department to seek request for proposals to formulate the Design Development Phase of the Central Park conceptual design approved by City Council on September 3, 1988. Additionally, that Council select one member to participate in the consultant selection process. Backaroundt, The development of the City Council approved conceptual plan for Central Park, will require two further phases of design study in order to establish documents for construction of the project. They are, the Design Development Phass and Construction Document Development. The current years City Budget allocates funding to begin the next phase? Design Development. Attached for Council review, is a proposal to seek professional consultant services for the Design Development phase. The proposal is refine into three sections for the purpose of ascertaining the following information: Section A: conrultant opaliti a'lo,1g Overall background of the firm and their ability to manage a project of this size Section B: Design and Concept Philosophy The firms understanding of the design process and the development approach they will bring to the project. section C: Services to be Rendered A detailed scope of services an to the methodology the firm will use to develop and complete the project to the Cities satisfaction. - 9� 2 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 7, 1988 O i TO: City Council and City manager From: Joe Schultz, Community services manager By: Dave Leonard, Park Projects coordinator Subject: Central Park Request for Proposal for Design Development services Recommendation• It is recommended that City Council authorize the Community Services Department to seek request for proposals to formulate the Design Development Phase of the Central Park conceptual design approved by City Council on September 3, 1988. Additionally, that Council select one member to participate in the consultant selection process. Backaroundt, The development of the City Council approved conceptual plan for Central Park, will require two further phases of design study in order to establish documents for construction of the project. They are, the Design Development Phass and Construction Document Development. The current years City Budget allocates funding to begin the next phase? Design Development. Attached for Council review, is a proposal to seek professional consultant services for the Design Development phase. The proposal is refine into three sections for the purpose of ascertaining the following information: Section A: conrultant opaliti a'lo,1g Overall background of the firm and their ability to manage a project of this size Section B: Design and Concept Philosophy The firms understanding of the design process and the development approach they will bring to the project. section C: Services to be Rendered A detailed scope of services an to the methodology the firm will use to develop and complete the project to the Cities satisfaction. - 9� 2 Page Two Request for Proposal -�� IIpon completion of the Design Development Phase, the City 7, will be provided with documents consisting of detailed 1 written text and drawings that will fix and describe she size 5 and character of thelentiie project including but not limited to architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical '• systems, materials, landscape, water features and all other elements as may be appropriate. '.'.' The selection process for the p prospective design development consultant Lira Sc reccsmended'by staff to include e one member' each from the Park and Recreation Commission, the Planning S' w Commission and City Council, the Assistant City Manager. Community Services Manager, Park Projects Coordinator and AsseciaLe Park Planner. The review and selection - process will take 4r approximately eight to ten week and should Council ' authorize the request for proposal, the recommendation of approval of a firm will be on the October City Council Agenda. JS: DLitp I 97 Rancho Cucamonga central Park Request for Proposal Design Development Phase The following information must be provided by all firms_ submitting proposals. Proposals will only be accepted on white, 8 1/2 x 11 paper, type written and bound in the upper left hand corner. Ton coplos of proposal sections A, H, and c shall be provided under plain cover titles ?nn�.ho Cucamonga Central Pa: 00" 6 , followed by proposal firms name, addrsee, phone number nd a co ntact person. A second 8 1/2 x 11 cover shall include section D and shall be title; Rancho Cucamonga Central Park: c e u e followed by proposn1 lirms name. One copy only, will be requ red of the fee schedule. - 98 i Section A Coneu?�anG o�eiification s t omen!• 1. List or name the followings A. Legal name of firms Specify if the company is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, association or other. S. List the discipline and role the firm will provide to the project. I - C. Address of firm (including address of bone office if 4'S different from office where project team will be 11' located), and a telephone number. t. n D. Provide resumes for all principals and key individuals y who will work on the project. Resumes should summarize the Professional experience of each person, present y responsibilities, and a description of their prior experience. E. Describe your organizational structure and managerial approach, delineating lines o[ responsibility. G 2. Who do you propose as Project Manager for thin Project? List experience on projects of similar types and sizes. Will your Project Manager have the authority to commit your firm for decisions relating to this project? What relationship will "r exist between your Project Designer and Project Manager? ,r J. Who do you propose as Project Designer /Planner for this Project? List exparience on projects of similar types and sizes for which that person was directly responsible. d. What role and degree of involvement will the principal(s) of your firm and your consultants have in this projectl' Designate principal(s) and corresponding role(s). 4 G A` 5. Please list the number of personnel /disciplines that will be used for this projects DISCIPLnM: Registered Support Personnel Personnel 6. Should your proposal utilize speciality consultants, state at what level the firm will be involved and the relationship thu firm will have in developing the plan. v 7. List your firm's recent experience in the design of other projects you fool are related in nature and Identify who the project managers and designers were. State any projects your firm has complatod for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the key personnel who worked on the project. S! Section B Donlan and concept Philosophy ] 1. Describe your firm's philosophy toward the role of the architect vs. the role of the City during the project, and .� what is your perspective on City /Architect interface? Discuss the mechanics of your working relationship with the City staff, elected officials and community representatives during the design and construction phase of the project. 2. Please outline briefly the design process to be utilized by your firm in dsvaloping facilities for Central Park. 3. The new central Park will provide a strong identity and image for Rancho Cucamonga. What type of architectural theme, style, language, or vocabulary would your firm promote for the Omni Center complex? Sports Center? Whore would you gain your design inspiration? 4. Name two Park projects of equal size and scope designod by firms other than yours which you admire, or from which yo• have gained substantial design inspiration. Why are these significant? s. Discuss your design philosophy /process and its relationship to park and facilities management, energy, water conservation, and long term maintenance. 6. State how you will develop this project to be sensitive to the surrounding community. section C Your proposal shall provide a detailed scope of work outlining in a clear and logical format, the necessary tasks envisioned to Complete the Design Development Phase. A. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Proposals shall be submitted under two covers: The first shall include ten (10) copies of the proposal sections A, B, and C requirements. It shall be clearly identified as "Proposal" The second shall require one sealed copy clearly labeled "Pas schedule ". B. MANDATORY PRE- SUM41TTAL CONFERENCE 1. Questions concerning the proposal shall only be received by written inquiry prior to 5:00 p.m. Priday, September 2, 1988 addressed to: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Request for Proposal, Central Park on Friday, September 9, 1988 a meeting will convene at 1:00 p.m. in the Forum Room of the city's Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Phone number 980 -3165. The purpose of the meeting will be to answer all questions received. C. PROPOSED WORK 1. Programming /space Planning /Site Analysis In order that this effort represent a comprehensive analysis of the City's needs, the Consultant shall got only utilize the preliminary space needs identified by the City, but also meat with City officials including the City Manager, department heads and staff, appointed and elected officials, community groups and other.i, as necessary, thereby verifying space needs, adjacency, access, location requirements, etc. The Consultant shall review data generated by these meetings with the City's designated representatives in order to develop the overall framework of criteria for Design Development. Schematic Design Based upon direction of the existing city approved Master conceptual plan and out come of the Programming Phase, the Consultant shall develop the requirements of _ boa • 103 the project in written and graphic fora and eball confirm such requirements with the city represantatives, - appointed and elected officials and others as necessary. •:% 3. Design Development consultant shall develop specifics of the elements of S each park component based on the approved Schematic �1± rk Design and incorporating the recommendations of the 4 City. The final product shall have been reviewed and �•" approved as to form, by various governing agencies, to ' include but not limited to, the City's Park and Recreation Commission, Planning commission, and City Council. • a, General Conditions ' a. Each phase of the work shall be bid on a lump sum or not to exceed amount. '• - b. City will furnish soils testa Y , topographical survey, traffic surveys, and plan check or processing fees. C. city will provide environmental documentation as Y•. required by CEQA. d. City considers it important that the successful • Consultant be located near the project site in order to facilitate coordination. Respondents are encouraged to indicate their proximity to the ? project location. City expects this office • location to remain constant for the duration of the project and shall not pay for travel, subsistence. telephone, and other expenses. e. All firms involved will be required to show proof of public liability and property damage coverage- and errors and omissions coverage. • 103 11 section D Pee Schedule The devslo ent of the Central Park site is envisioned as a single project with three major phases. The city requires each Consultant to brerkdown their fees and time frame by completing the following spaces. This worksheet must be returned in a separate envelope as specified. 1. `;i. *+L11T yEp. HOAR WEERS A. PROGRAMMING SPACE PLANNING r B. SCHEMATIC DESIGN- ', CIVIC CENTER C. DESIGN �. DEVELOPMENT 2. ,consultant Pee schedule A. Provide a schedule of hourly billing rates for each firm submitting under this proposal. Rates provided shall be valid through the duration of the project. jd� s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t STAFF REPORT �_ Datet August 3, 1988 To: Mayor, Mm* ra of City Council Lauren Wasserman, City Manager From: Joe Schultz, community Services Manager BY: Dave Leonard, Part. Projects Coordinator Re: Purchase of Property Adjacent to the Cities Lions Park Facility it is recommended that City council accept the offer of a Grant Dead for the easterly 155.0 feet of Assessor Parcel 10208- 011 -26, 7389 Lions Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California from Mark and Kathleen C. Johnson and authorize the City Engineer to certify the conveying and recordation of the deed and the Finance Manager to issue a check in the sum of $25,000.00 for the purchase. The resident of 7389 Lion Street, Rancho Cucamonga, Mr. Hark Johnson approached the City in December of 1987 about the cities interest in purchasing the easterly 155.0 by 65 feet portion of his property (see Exhibit A). The land borders on the southern property line of the Cities Lions Park Facility. city Staff commissioned a preliminary title report and appraisal of the property. Eased on the information, Mr. Johnson offered to sell the land for $25,000.00. City council at the April 6, 1988 meeting gave direction to Staff ' to proceed with the purchase based on that sum. The real property is currently in escrow with Ticor Title. To complete the transaction, City Council must accept the offer and authorize the issuance of a check in the amount of $25,000.00 to be funded from account number 20- 6532 -8808. t' r•'� ,�� It rpyCrC :iJCI, .�„_ 2OZ �Svq..� 2 ZQG L_23 Ig �4 ' t_ iZ_ � t avEAVE rl L 30 { .I y 4 © I 14 i i Uon'iuk -: FEP , °C° •. 9 ° t —Ano oHUN 1q I Ayle- Alm1w. elk a ut Alm tiffs Shorn in Adel EXHIBIT A ,OL O r�i it / 17 U.SKw AkSS#W"3 airs Scok 2CS Pcge CI Scn 3Lm°r:im County I CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 3, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Englnc,er Subject: The setting of a Public Hearing Date of September 7, 1988 for an Environmental Assessment Review for the proposed modification of the Foothill Boulevard - Interstate 15 Interchange RECOMMEIOATION• ommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution Ating of a Public Hearing on the City Council's next meeting iedntsday. September 7, 1988, for the proposed Interchange on Environmental Assessment Review and that it direct the City submit an Environmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to Report by Thursday. August 25, 1988 for a one -time publication August 28, 1988, ten calendar days prior to said public to pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) BACKGRWW /ANALYSIS: This report presents the Engineering Staff's request to set a Public Hearing date for the above subject Environmental Assessment Review. Said Assessment Review is in conformarce with CEQA requirements and shall render an environmental evaluation of the City's proposed Interchange Modification. Respectf X submitted, i RHN:PAR:pcm Attachment a •, ,4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF t RANCHO CUCAMONGA. APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING OATE•OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1988 FOR THE PROPOSED INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the City's Engineering % Staff to proceed with formal designs for the Modification of the Foothill Boulevard - Interstate 15 Interchange; and WHEREAS, said proposed improvement requires an Environmental Assessment; and WiiEREAS, an Environmental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucmoonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves an se s a public hearing date of Wednesday, September 7, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. to be held at the Lions Park Com,'J ty Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California for the proposed interchange modification Environmental Assessment Review; and Section 2: The City Clerk is directed to submit the attached City of Rancho u� nga Environmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to the Da11y Report by Thursday. August 28, 1988 for a one -time publication on Sunday. August 28, 1988, ten calendar days prior to said public hearing date 3' pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE A complete environmental assessment has been prepared for the following project. The City Council will be considering this assessment, staff's recommendation, and public input, at their meeting of September 7, 1988 prior to making a final environmental determination. Following is a brief description and location of the project(s) and staff's recommendation on the project to be considered. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE DECL0ATION FOR THE PROPOSED INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION - CITY OF RANCID CUCAMONGA _ The modification generally entails the construction of a new rasp within the existing interchange between Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard, traffic sfgnaI, and widening of existing roadways within the interchange. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is reconimended that Citpy. Council approve the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed interchange modification. A copy of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Eng9ineering Division Office located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite 'B', Rancho Cucamon a, Callfornfa. Written comments should be addressed to the Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91130, or phoned at (714) 989 -1862. In addition, concerns can be addressed to the City Council publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. and shall take place at Llons Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. PUBLISH: �a9 ORDINANCE Y.O. 964 AN ORD_NANCB OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF IRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROvING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT. DIIA 88 -06. RPgUESTING TD AMEND THE M VMOPlENT DISTRICT NAP FOR YBE PURPOSE OP PRgZOHING TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWHLLIM UNITE FEW ACRE) FOR 96 LCRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWA M AVENUE AND 24TH STREST.�.RAN= The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, dean ordain as folloaat A. Recitolat (i) Terrance Nelcher has filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 88-06 as dese•.ibed to the title of thin Ordinancey.. Hereinafter in this Ordinance the subject Development District amendment is referred to as *the application*. (it) On the 22 of June. 1988, the Planning Cmmiaclon of the City of Rancho Cucamongs bold a duly noticed public beating on the application. concluded said heating an that date, and recommended adoption of the application. (fit) On the 13th of July. 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public bearing concerning the application. concluded acid 'nearing on that data, and duly beard add considered the Planning Commission recooeendation. B. Ordinance. NON. THERFIDNE, IT IS HEREBY POUND. DETERMINED AND ORDAINED BY ME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMflNGA AS FOLIAWS: ' 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts met forth in the Reritalc. Part A. of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing, including written and orel staff reports. this Council specifically finds as follrwst (a) The application 'ins to 96 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Brigand& Avenoo and 24th Street and is presently undeveloped land in the =incorporated area of San Bernardino County. Said property is within the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of influence and is designated by the General Plan as Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). �/v 1. Ordinance Na 364•t page 2 't,a! •e r, (b) the property to the north of the snbjectisitr is designated.. .y Residential. County of Ban•Bernardino. (up to 2 dwelling mite Vi acre) 'and is' mdevelopedt the property to the vast is designated utility eugent.,,County,of Fen Bernardino and Is vacentl the property, to the east is designated Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) and is mdevelopedt and the property to the south is within the City of Rancho amcamonga, designated Btivanda Specific plan and le undeveloped. 3. Bawd upoo the substantial evidence promoted to this Council during the above - referenced meatiug and upon the specific lindinge of facts net forth in paragraph 1 and.2 above, this Council hereby finds and' concludes as followat (a) that the 96 acre property is suitable for a =ester planned - residential development and is eompatible with the existing Cenetal plan designation for the land one in the surrounding areal and (b) That the proposed development designation will not have a eignif aunt Impact on the environment: and i CO that the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Man designation of Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). 4. this wuneil hereby finds and certifies that the Development District Amendment has teen reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Bnvirntmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the finding, and conclusion oat forth in paragraph It 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Development District A=fadaent 58-06 on the 13th day of July. 1988. E ORDINANCE NO. 365 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITE GOMM OF RANCHO COCANONGm. CALIFOBFIA. APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMW AND S+ BI4: DEVELOPMENT AGRLNP NO. 88-01 - TERRANCE ® MELQ7BR, FOR ANNBIATION AND DEVELOPMENT OP A 96 ACRE PORTION OF SAN BRANARDINO COUNTS UNINCORPORATED AREA LOCATED AT THE NOR7HMT MAKER OF BTFWANDA AVhh'UB AND 2411I STREET A. Recitals. (1) California Goverment Code Section 65864 new provides, in pertinent part, as follwat wTUe Legislature finds and declare@ tbatt (a) The lack of cortainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the coat of housing and other dwelopment@ to the consumer. and discourage invastment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make mazimum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. (b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning. and reduce the economic costs of development." (it) California Goverment Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, an follovem "Any city..., may enter into a development agreement with any person having a legal or egaiteb2e interest in real property for the development of cueb property as provided in tbie article...." (iii) California Government Cede Section 65865.2 provides as follovat "A development agrament shall specify the duration of the agreement. tbo permitted urea of the property. the density of intensity of um..." (iv) Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "1", and incorporated berein by this reference, to a proposed Development Agreement concerning, that property located at the northwest corner of Etivanda Avenue and 24th Street, Hereinafter in thin Ordinance, that agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "1" is referred to so wtbe Development Agreement." Ordinance No. 365 Page 2 (v) On June 22. 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Ranebo, Cucamonga bold a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement and concluded said bearing on that date. (vi) On July 13. 1988. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public bearing concerning the Development Agreement. concluded said beating an that date. and an that date consid, red the Planning Comiasion recommendation. (vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinanca have occmrred. E. Ordinance. NOW. 7RMMRE. IRS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.MNCA. CALIFORNIA. DOES ORDAIN AS POLLOWSt 1. In all respects as set forth in Recitals. Part A of this Ordinance. 2. Is conjunction with the Development Agreement. an Initial Study and preliminary 2"Iromental Assessment has been prepared. in conformity with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970: and thin Council bas determined that this application cosld not hwe a significant adverse effect on tba environment. hereby adopts a finding of no aignifirart impact and foams a Negative Declaration. 3. Thi3 Council specifically finds tbatt (a) The 96 acre property is suitable for a mantel planned residential development and io compatible with the existing General Plac designation for the land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the Development Agreement will not have a significant impact on the emiroment; and (c) That the Development Agreement is in conformance with the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per - acre). 4 The City Council hereby approves and ordains the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit wle. I(3 Ordinance No. 365 Page 4 MMIBIT "1' RECORDING REQDESTRD BY AND WREN RECORDED NAIL TO: Beverly A. Autbelet City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamongc. California 91730 DRVELOPMNT AGRMMIZT OONCBP.NING MT PROPERTY GRNERALLY LOCATED AT ME NORTHURST COME OF ETICANDA AVENUE AND 241E STREET THIS AGREENBNr is made and entered into as of the thirt7—firot day following final adoption of the .,rdinance approving it ( hetinafter, the "Effective Date') by and between the CITY OF RAN ®0 COCAMNOA, a mumicipal corporation ('City" hereinafter) and DORIS DAY. PRANK DE VOL and GRACE DR VOL (hereinafter collectively referred to as 'Developer'). V I T N g g g E T NS A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 65864 provides as 1071mst "The Legislature !Inds and declares tbatt "(a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of hocaing and other development to the consumer. and diaceurag" investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. "(b) Anscrance to the applicant fir a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies. rules dad regolaticns, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning. and reduce the economic costa of development." (ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides in pertinent part as follmat -Any city, . . may enter into a development agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such proparty as provided in thin article. . . ." Ordinance No. 365 r Page 5 a (iii) California GwermwnL Code Section 35865.2 provides as follows: wA development agreement shall specify the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the douaity or intensity of use, the maximan height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for resonation or dad I.tion of land for public purposes. The development agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary action, provided that such conditions, terns, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions shall not Prevent development of the land for the urea and to the density or intensity of development get forth in the agreement. The agreement may provide that construction shall be commenced within a specified time and that the project or any phase thereof be completed within a specified time.• (iv) Developer owns fee title in and to tbet real property consisting of approximately 96 screw generally located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County now proposed for annexation to City. Said proparty is legally described do Exhibit A attached hereto and hereinafter is referred to as "the Site.- (v) City's general plan designation for the Site is low density residential (no to four units per acre). Developer and City desire to provide through this Development Agreement specific development criteria to be applicable to the Site upon its annexation to t.ity which will provide for maximum efficient utilization of the Site in accordance with sound planning principles. (vi) This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the provisions of Article 2.5 of Chapter 4. Title 7 of the California Government Code commencing with Section 65864 thereof. B. Agreement. NOW, 7NEREFORE, the portion hereto agree an follows: 1. The parties hereby agree that City's zoning and prezoning designation for the Site hereby is domed to be law residential (L) subject to the specific terms and prwigions hereof which shall supersede conflicting standards and requirements of the low residential (L) district so long as this agreement to in •ull force and effect. The duration of thin Development Agreement shall be ieven (7) years following the Effective Date, that in. upon the expiration of tfe seven (7) year period coanencing immediately after the Effective Date, if Developer has not then Performed construction work on the Site or any portion or Portions thereof pasuant to a building permit or Permits iscued by City. the Site or any such portion or portions thereof shall then be domed to be zoned low residential (L) and the development of the Site then and thereafter shall be governed accordingly by the then current Provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance as to L zoning or the than applicable specific plan and /or zoning category succeeding thereto. For the foregoing purpose. construction work shall not include preparation of Plana, engineering work or grading. IS ordinance No. 365 Page 5 2. The following development standards and conditions theeprwBovern the development of the Site during the ten hereof, subject of paragraph 1 bereimbov" A. City shall allow the Site to be developed to a density of up to three (3) dwelling units per acre. calculated in accordance with City'■ method of calculationapply specified soy evitbie the 'escandizde oti the tlow Date. Daoelopet may residential W sons. B. {flan mud if requested by Developer free time to time. City shall use its best effort• to initiate and process to completion proceedings pursuant to the Nello-Raos Community Facilities Act of 1982. the Municipal Improvement Act of 1911, the Meaicipl Imprevment Act of 1913. the any and all Bond Act of 1915. the Lendecapirg and Lighting u Act eooduit2financi 8 for 6e of other available proceedings to provide for p construction of public imptovmanta required ad a condition to development of the Site or any portion or portions thereof. C. In lien of that dleertiraquiredndduecstod the T%idential Developer $ball M City's development of the Site. Said park fees eball be talealatod in accordance with standards in effect at the time any such fsaidare arkfeesand shallOwing. be py8ble residential development within any final tract, park occupancy of otesidenal occupancy rleases utilities for for I lot contained within a final tract wben City D. Subject to subparagraphs 2.8 and F hereinbelow. Developer chap pay any and all City fees required as a result of development of the Site, or any portion or portions thereof, at ratan current parthe fees. psystms on intending, but nbuildingtpermit fees. plane check feessand drainage tees. development teas, R. Developer may request and City shall extend to Developer credit against - equired drainage fees only to the extent of Developer's direct construction mate incurred in constructing permanent 24tb Street Heater Storm Drain drainage facilities by yfCity as a condition of developing the site or any portion or portions - V. Developer may request and City shall extend to Developer credit against required systoms development fees only to the extent of Developer's ilies (iiee,c facilities construction sized incurred outside of oversized he Site) which are not located within the inLedevelopment g the Developer shall be entitle signals are required by thin entitled to credit against required systems development fees to the "tent above the Developer's fair share. Further. if City requires the improvement of thavSits, venue between 24thhStreet and nitsednto Davinteri attect secesa to no /r6 Ordinance No. 365 Page 7 C. Developer shall cannot to the creation of an assessment district or districts to provide for the constrcction and maintenance of any and all lighting and landscaping within public rights -of -way within the Site or abutting the Site pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 or, if applicable. Developer shall consent to an anaezation or annexations of the Site or any portion or portions thereof to an existing assessment district formulated under mid Act for that purpose. R. If required by City am a condition of development of the Site or any portion or portions tacreof. Developer shall consent to the application of tb* Hello-Roos PacUities Act of 1982 thereto to construct and maintain facilities and /or to purchase and maintain equipment reasonably necessary to provide fire protection services to the Site or the applicable portion or portions thereof. I. If required by City as a condition of dovelopxent of the Site or any portion or portions thereof. Developer shall consent to the application of the PAllo-Roos Facilities Act of 1982 thereto, or Developer contribution of equivalent fonds, to construct regional drainage facilities. 4. Except as expressly modified herein, all substantive and procedural requirements and provisions contained in City's ordinances, specific plans, rules and regriations, including, but not limited to, its Development Code, as amended, building code, electrical code, fire code and plumbing code shall apply to the development of the Site pursuact to ttie Development Agreement. Further, any toms or pbraceo contained ber*in for which that* are definitions provided in City's mid Development Code aball b* deemed to be utilized in accordance with ttose definitions. 5. In accordance with California Government Code Section 65868.5, a certified copy of this Agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, immediately upon this Agreement becoming effective. 6. The parties further agree as follorsm A. Except as expressly get forth in this Agreement, no representations of any kind or character have been made to one another by 'any - of the parties hereto or by any of the parties' agents, representatives. associates or attorneys with respect to each subject to which thin Agreement relatea. B. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to each subject to which it relates. C. This Agreement can only be amended in vriting, which writing must first be executed by all of the parties bereto. D. No provision of this Agreement may be waived, except in vriting, which writing must be executed by all of the parties bereto. ordinance No. 365 Page 8 m• .�` B. The parties hereto each agree that they shall e:eente and deliver to the other. upon request so to do, any and m doc reasonable and necessary to accomplish or evince the agreements ts wntai ntained in or contmplated by tbia Agreement. ^' p. In the event that any party should default in one or sore of ' its obligations provided in or contmplated by this Agreement. the defaulting party shall pay to the other all expenses incurred in ce¢neiion rith efforts to enforce much obligation. including reasonable ottornsyso ten. whether or not suit be co eviced. G. This Agreement, all other documents and agreements provided in or contemplated btrtby. and all rights and obligations arising therefrom shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their i respective btiro, representatives, successors and assigns. IN AI1Ng98 TiH8RE0p. the parties bne executed and eni%•red Into this Agtement as of the effective date of the ordinance approving thin Agreement. QT'S OF RANCHO CUCAMMA Dated% - - - - mayor Bated% By - City Clerk I/ R, 1 1 — CITY OF. RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT BATE: August 3, 1980 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES94M aun rnunrrr n s r son aeRYIng the development of a school facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot stion office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse and a 15,600 square foot transportation/maintenance on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east !ryl street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202 - 041 -01 Associated with the development is a Tree Removal questing the removal of three (3) nature trees. I from July 20, 1988) Cn July 20, 1988, the City Council continued the public hearing for two weeks. The City Council also requested that staff send notices to adjacent property owners regarding this matter. As of this report, notices have been mailed. Attached for your review are the previous staff reports. Res fully tted Br d er City P nner 88:54 :ko Attachments: July 20, 1988 Staff Report January 20, 1988 Staff Report { r: r s 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Voters of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -41 - appeal ot the Plan n ng ammiss on s aecision cenying the development of a school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation/maintenance buildtno on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - 202- 041 -01 and 41. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three (3) mature trees. (Continued from I. RECOMMENDATION: While the applicant has indicated that they will request an adaftional continuance, staff recomends that the City Council not grant any further continuance and address whether the land use is appropriate for this location. Ii. BACKGROUND: This is an appeal originally scheduled for the City ounc on January 20, 1988. Prior to the meeting, the applicant requested a 90 -day continuance in order to explore alternatives to the Beryl site. As a result, the City Council continued the item to April 20, 1988. On April 20, 1988, the applicant again requested that the public hearing be continued for an additional 90 days. At that time, the Council expressed some reservations, but did agree to a continuance to July 20, 1988. Since that time, staff has been in contact with the applicant to determine if there is any new information pertinent to the application. The applicant has indicated that informal conversations Lave occurred with the property owner of the "Bennett Lot' adjacent to the city hall facilities on Base Line Road. No firm details or commitments have been reached at this point. The applicant has not indicated that other sites have been explored. - �aa RE: C July 2 Page 2 II1. ANALYSIS: As noted on the attached City Council report of January i ZD; I?1W the Planning Commission denied the Conditional Use Permit based on ncompatabilIties of the land use and of the design of the warehouse end administration buildings. It is Important to note that the applicant is going through th.s public hearing process because the School District facility is in administration office and warehouse location. Should the School District decide to locate a school at this site, the facility would be exempt from the City's review process. P As noted in the recommendation, staff is suggesting that the City Council discuss whether the proposed land use, particularly the warehouse /maintenance use, is approprfate for this predominantly residential location. If the Council determines that the land use is acceptable, th^ Council should send the item back to the Planning CppaI misslon to resolve design issues. If t`he Council feels / thai the /iArtd use proposed is not acceptable for this area,- then i "the Scho Istria would have direction to Pursue alternate sites. BraUd Buu r fie' City m nner 8D:SM:ko Attachments:Exhibit 'A` - January 20, 1988 City Council Staff Report a I. nrmv nc a Arartun M W Antnx6A -. A.v.. STAFF REPORT �'8 r 0 p U 2 DATE: January 20, 1988 ' I� TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council IRON: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -41 - ALTA LUKA SCHOOL OTgArCT— An appea o o Hann rg umn ss on s decision eny ng the development of a school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation/ maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202 - 001 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three (3) mature trees. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of on ono se Permit 87 -41. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background, On December 9, 1987, the Planning Commission con uc e a public hearing to consider all elements of the proposed school district facility. At that time, several area residents, including homeowners to the east and a representative of the church to the north, expressed their opposition to the proposal. In addition, a petition with approximately 65 names of surrounding residents was submitted in opposition to the proposal. After considering all aspects.- of the project, the Planning Commission determined that the land use and architecture were not appropriate for -this location. B. Land Use: In examining the project based on the uses proposed, IFF—Planning Commission stated that the school district facility was not appropriate in the residential area for the following reasons: 1. The facility would include industrial type uses such as machine and wood shops, a paint booth, and bus maintenance area that are not permitted in a residential zone under other circumstances. d',;L CITY COuNCIL•STAFP ..;PORT CUP 87 -41 - Alta Loma School District January 20, 1988 Page 2 f 2. The vehicle maintenance facility, together with the i machine and wood shops would generate excessive noise and vibration in the area. 3. The paint booth would generate unwarranted odors and potential hazardous contamination by airborne particulants. 4. The facility would increase heavy vehicle traffic (trucks and buses) on nearby streets which would normally be limited to residential traffic, thereby contributing to excessive noise and vibration. 5. The proposal will create excessive light and glare which will adversely Impact the adjacent areas. C. Building Architecture: The Planning Commission also felt that Me— arc ec ure proposed was not appropriate for this location. The warehouse is designed using a prefabricated metal building which is not compatible with the residential character of the area. Within the Industrial Specific Plan area, metal buildings are only permitted within the Heavy Industrial Designations. The Planning Commission also felt that the design of the administration building, while better than the warehouse building, was not compatible with the residential area because the 225' width is out of scale with the area. D. Expansion: The Planning Commission expressed concern that if ei7i Proporal was approved at this location that the 5 acre Parcel located to the south (also owned by Alta Loma School District) might be the likely location of an expansion of this use and /or of the storage of the bus fleet which is presently stored at Chaffey College. This would further compound the adverse impacts on adjacent properties and properties in the vicinity. Ale ully s1tt d, e nner 88:SM:vc Attachments: Letter of Appeal Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Comission Resolution of Denial / 2-3 JIM A. MARQUEZ December 17, 1987 Miss Beverly Autholet City Clark City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Basaline Rd., Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91703 CITY 0 RANCHO C VF MONGA ADMINISTRA110N DEC 181981 Im 7101904111p11121014016 Of< pdAdOl(o,� i 1 G• ref Appeal Planning Commission Decision denying Conditional Use Application *public Facility Dee° Dear Miss Autholett This Office has been authorized the Planning commissiondecisiondenying Conditional Una Permit Application no. Cup No. 87 -41 a request of the Alta Loma School District to establish a public facilities use on the property located on the east side of Beryl Street south of 19th street - "Mt 202- 061 -01 F 42 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The applicants contend by this filing that the planning commission arrored in evaluating the public facilities use as_ being inconsistent with the zoning ordinance and genral plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Further, the school district finds that planning commission denial results in hardships which joopardizs the delivery of educational facilities contrary to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Please find attached a check in the amount of $126.00 from the Alta Loma school District. I i I 1 t , , - ' 1 1 1 4 I'll i l l t o 1a l.hh i:9 i1 .`�V,•L1.1', t Hs. Debra Beverly Authelet December 17, 1987 Page g Should the :ity have any further quastions or desire y additional information pertaining to this appeal please to contact this office. Leel irde verrytiruly yours, D A. /)er inoipa Planning consultant JAM+dbo.079 cc: Alta Loma School District Hr. Floyd Stork carmichael- :Comp, architects /J5 am OIJEI TO IM1.i111e/e n>1 Mr VM•N![ MRfarl s Rl elpl Nnmbw i 47902 LMOIIAI - s lib a� vpa. •r.s4i �L C1I]TCNM7 COIL ' _ S J (714) 939.1851 L C�' S4P'•1 s£' CITY OF rSANC110 CUCAMONGA i'ost 011ice iio� 9U7 Q•17O C Onm Line (load i 8milo cm9llldtsp. CA ".1vn4! 9173() yy __ 0"ils K19 M'�Tlp pHpr}p OIINOI Y' %I14 � {IT IYOW I\ \Ir lllln 0.)bl>Tn — InAlirxO illwlif - _� —.� �• Iyg1,11W wi!\ciF maelna 1i"wliini:ilisy ' -- tlSlt)iN IIZ(J1 %.1 iliW illl ' �( niln rwe - -- — iw'lwLcwu ri��iji a:yl me �" irgrylir'::Iblifi ( •; (• 3/�_�� 7'( +t' OIJEI TO IM1.i111e/e n>1 Mr VM•N![ MRfarl s Rl elpl Nnmbw i 47902 LMOIIAI - s lib a� am Mr, frank Giommulva, 800 North Haven Avenue. Suite 450, Ontario, Manager for Wells Fargo Bank handling this piece of property held ur4& the Tolstoy Construct, stated clarification of the improvements the Community Trail. Barrye Hanson stated all improvements are required to caplated Defore recordation of a parcel map unless bonded for, ii; project could substitute for the bonding in this case. Russ Mlaguire. City "cngtnear, stated the 1 on Parcel 1 at the same Lire as the stree I$ putting the street improvements in and Commissioner Chttiea stated it was the in to make this a requirement. Russ Maguire stated this is a contr Council and the landowner. This i defined project. At this time, ulc agreement of the property ern. ,...a the interpretation the City can extend would include the g across both Parcels developer will be frontages of Parcel the grading on Hill physical trail. Chairman MCNiei J raoing efflRrainas 1 anjMV When Y obli d to com 1 2. The C bu t t not the the public hearing. P r nts are going in Mis go in. The City nclude the trail. of the Trails Committee agreement between the City 19 contract budgeted and a ;e City Council action and 'he City has agreed within Dents and the project that ng so that Hillside Street ry for the Community trail it occurs on Parcel 2, the improvements across both take on the obligation of on of building the actual I moved to approve the project as modified, eY seconded the motion. Motion carried by the AYESi:r COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY. EMERICK, MCNIEL NO COMMISSIONERS: NONE / ENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE kBSTAIN: COMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -- carried L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -41 - ALTA ail cons s ng df a e10.5000 psquare footscadministration building, a 18,170 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation, /maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), Planning Commission Minutas -13- December 9, 1987 ■ 4 i t I Y Y 4 Y, located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202 - 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of four 1 4 ) mature trees. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Blakesley questioned the height of the warehouse. Mr. Murphy responded 18 feet in height. Commissioner Tolstoy requested clarification of the distance from the south boundary line of the school property to the proposed development. property to the proposed development. Mr. Murphy responded 330 feet. Commissioner Tolstoy asked whether staff has seen a proposal for the vacant property south of the proposed site. Mr. Murp10l stated no, but indicated that it is currently General Planned and zoned Residential, therefore he would anticipate that it would be developed as residential single family. Chairman 14:Niel opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim Marquez, 1334 Parkview Avenue, Manhattan Beach, representing the Alta Loma ;'chool District, stated they agree and concur with the staff report. Mr Marquez presented the background of the school district and the purchase of this property. Commissioner Chitiea questioned the size of the undeveloped parcel below the proposed site. Mr. Marquez responded 5.2 acres, the same size of the proposed project. Commissioner Blakesley questioned what size of parcel would the school district look for in developing an elementary school. Mr Marqu_z responded anywhere from five to seven acres. Ms. Rose Cayler, 9090 Hamilton, Rancho Cucamonga, representing the majority of the residents, namely on Hamilton, Zircon, and Opal neighboring the proposed site, stated her concerns regarding the traffic, noise, the decrease of property value, parking, and having a metal building in a residential neighborhood. Ms. Cayler stated the land should be developed as residential. Commissioner Emerick questioned Ms. Cayler how she felt if this site were to be developed as an elementary school. Ms. Cayler stated she felt the neighbors would like to see this developed as residential. Planning Commission Minutes -14- December 9, 1987 - la � 1 �K V S 7' 'a i r Mr. Mark Vogelsang, 9071 Hamilton, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the issues of traffic congestion, noise, and feels this could attract vandalism. He felt a school would be more suitable in tho area rather than the proposed warehouse and workshops. Mr. Vogelsang would prefer to see the area remain residential. Mr. Richard Feurstain, 9582 Golden, Alta Loma, stated that warehnuses, maintenance operations, and equipment yards do not belong to a residential neighborhood. He felt that the Planing Commission would not approve this unattractive of a building even In an industrial development. He agreed with the traffic congestion and the aesthetics Of the proposed project. Pastor Mike Johnson, En Agape Christian Fellowship Church, agreed with the concerns of the traffic congestion and felt that a metal building should not be allowed in a residential ana. Mr. Jim Marquez, representing the Alta Lome School District, addressed the residents' concerns and expressed how they felt they have mitigated the traffic, security, vandalism, and street width concerns. He felt these issues and been adequately addressed and resolved. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Chairman WNW stated this proposal is significantly ccunter to what Planning Commission trying M t land use and standpoint. Chairma cN el continued sting though he understands the school districts position, to allow this project in a residential project makes no sense at all. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with Chairman McNiel on the land use Issue, the circulation, and aesthetic problems. The Planning Commission wou not consider this type of project anywhere else in the City, except ld perhaps In the heavy industrial area. Commissioner Chitiea stated that 19th Street is already heavily impacted and does not find the proposed solution workable. The warehouse, aesthetically, is a severe problem. The architecture alone is another whnle issue and this project has significant problems. Commissioner Chitiea stated a lad swap or exchange might be pursued in order for the school district to relocate to an area in the City that would be more appropriate to in meeting both the needs of the School District and the City. Coro'-%toner Blakesley agreed with the concerns of the citizens and with the ssioners and addressed other issues regarding lighting and the use and storage of various hazardous waste materials that will occur at the warehouse and maintenance shops. Commissioner Blakesley stated he could not find that the project contributed anything positive to the neighborhood or the City. planning Commission Minutos -Is- lay December 9, 1987 i y a Commissioner Tolstoy concurred with the previous comoents of the other Commissioners stating the issue is primarily land use and can't really be solved solely through design and suggested the district look at other areas within the City to relocate. Commissioner Emerick stated in Design Review they only looked at design and not lard use. The Design Review Committee felt the heavy landscaping pro Sal to camouflage the warehouse building is not the Ideal limitst n�budgetne CommSchool oer with neighbors' concerns and other Commissioners' comments. Commissioner Chittea moved to direct staff to prepare a resolution of dental. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE +• *► :► -- carried Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this item would be continued to the January 13, 1988 meeting, to be brought back as a Consent Calendar item with a Resolution of Dental. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he did not feel the bootleg buildings were appropriate in this residential area and would like to see them removed. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Commission could direct staff to proceed to work through Code Enforcement to remove the buildings. The Commission directed staff to proceed with Code Enforcement. 'a Rl AMU TAKIANU ar -16 - BON - A request to e an apar n u ng rom one story to two feet of adjoining single family residences for a partmeut project on 1.16 acres of land to the :tial District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), ses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Hain Street - Scott Murphy. Associate Planner, the staff report. Atilt Chairman MCNiel opened the public hearing. Mr Peter Bon, applicant, 1610 Nest Holt, Pomona, rem variance allmeasementbandddedicateditomtheeCitytnaNr. Bonepresented baekg d in the project. Planning Commission Minutes -16- December 9, 1987 _ � 30 u Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMI(GA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 9, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner �j �'G� �•** i�iy 19n SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -41 e eve opmen u a sc qo administration offices a 16,075 squares foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation/ maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land In the Lvw Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202 - 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the re=val of 3 mature trees. 1. PROJECT ND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, phasing plan, concep ua gra nq plan, conceptual landscape plan, elevations for the administration and warehouse buildings, Tree Removal Permit, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundfn Land Use and Zon1n South - Vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dweelling units per acre) ) East - Singgle family residential under construction; Low Nest - Singllenfamily2resid residential andivacant; Low Residential (2 -4 duelling units per acre) C. General plan Des1 nations: e_f Northc - Low Residentialn(2 ial -4 dwelli glunitsu sacre)acre) per (2 -4 East - Low Residential dwelling units per acre) Kest - Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Low- Medfum Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 131 ITEM L a `A PLANNING COMMISSIO TAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LUNA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The northwest portion of the site is resen y prove w asphalt paving, a 'bootlegaed' portable ulidtng, and several pportable storage receptacles. fie remainder of the site is vacant with an average slope of roughly 2.5% from northwest to southeast. There is an existing concrete flood control channel within a City easement that cuts diagonally through the northeast corner of the site. The site also contains several eucalyptus trees - two in the southwest corner along Beryl and others along the eastern side of the project area. E. Parking Calculations: Type Square Parking Number Sces of Spaces of of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Phase 1 - Office 1,321 1/250 5 10 Warehouse 14,754 1/1000 7151/ 125 Phase 2 - Office 10,500 Warehouse 16,075 1/11000 16 28 17 7I Phase 3 - Office 10,500 1/250 42 43 Warehouse 31,675 1/1000 32 32 Bus 13 74' 'M F. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code condltlonally . _ perm s pu c aciTftTes /utilities within the Low Residential District. Because there are no classrooms proposed, the project egulatins therefore, requires the C nditionaleUse Permit. and II ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a school facility consisting atn916,075 asquare square sare foot building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation /maintenance building. The development of the facility will be handled in three phases. The initial phase will consist of the construction of the warehouse building, a parking and loading 3c3- PLANNING COINISSIO TAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LUmA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 3 area, the driveways out to Beryl, and. a spray booth.. The warehouse will accommodate a machine and carpentry shop, bus maintenance area, and temporary office facilities. Immediately following the construction of the warehouse building, Phase 2 will commence with the development of the administration office, the completion of the parking lot, and the removal of the offices fray, the warehouse building. With the completion of Phase 2, all 1 rovements will be completed on the western two- thirds of the site. At this point in time, Phase 3, the transportation / wintenance building 1s purely conceptual. There are no imedlate plans to construct this building. The applicant does feel, however, that there may be a need for this building in the future if the school district was to unify with another district. As a result, the applicant has provided the use as part of the overall master plan for the site. The building elevation and floor plans have not been reviewed and would have to be approved prior to construction. B. Land Use: The Development Code established a list of uses that po e- a y have greater impacts on adjoining properties or properties ir, the vicinity, Because of these potential impacts, a Conditional Use Permit is required. Such is the case with the school district facility. In considering the re quest, the Planning Commission may want to consider the following points, both pro and con, in determining whether the proposed use is appropriate for this location: Pro 1. The facility would not be located directly adjacent to any single family residences. There Is a church located to the north. The flood control channel provides a physical barrier between the facility and the homes to the east. The vacant residentially zoned property to the south 1s owned by the School District and there are no plans to sell the land at this time. The warehousing and maintenance facilities are separated by several hundred feet and screened by the administration building from the homes across Beryl Street. 2. Bus and truck traffic will access the site from 19th Street (365 feet to the north) thereby eliminating additional heavy traffic down Beryl Street. Truck deliveries are estimated by the School District at two ner week. /33 PLANNING COMMISSIO. rAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9,'1987 Page 4 3. The closest structure, the church, typically operates at hours opposite those of the School District. The District operates 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday !hru Friday while the church's peak hours are on Sunday. 4. The warehouse building is setback approximately 212 feet back from Beryl, 60 feet from the north perimeter, and 96 feet from the ^outh perimeter in an attempt to minimize the impact on surrounding properties. Con I. The School District facility is reposing several uses that may not be appropriate within a residential area. The warehousing, machine and carpentry shops, paint booth and bus maintenance are uses more typically found within the industrial area of the City. The administrative office use is generally located within commercial, office or industrial locations. 2. The facility will increase heavy vehicle traffic (1.e. buses, trucks) over what would normally be expected with residential development of the site. 3. If the School District did decide to sell off the property to the south, residential units might be located directly adjacent to the warehouse facility. 4. The warehouse building is a pre- engineered metal structure lacking in architectural treatment. Metal buildings are normally only allowed in the heavy industrial area. C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee ° iamaxeshey, err c , or_ man) reviewed the proposal on November 19, 1987. At that time, the Committee felt that the structures Proposed were not appropriate for the following reasons: 1. Administration Building - The long (1225 feet), linear design of the building was not compatible with the residential area. alternative manner Thee utiLinorsf - ;U' d haped)stonminimize the linear appearance. In addition, the building should incorporate two story elements to provide some vertical elements in the building design to further minimize the linear features. The Committee also recommended greater relief on the Beryl Street elevation. /3�1 PLANNING COMIISSIO; rAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 5 2. Warehouse Building - The metal siding and roofing proposed were inappropriate within a residential area. The building should be redesigned to incorporate elements compatible with the residential area and to tie in with the administration building. Also, alternatives should be explored to try and minimize the height of the warehouse building to reduce its impact from the surrounding areas. 3. A decorative Klock wall should be provided around the pertweter of the site to screen the warehouse /service area. 4. The driveways located at the north and south ends of the administration building should be reduced to 30 feet in width and additional landscaping should be provided at the ends of the building. S. Additional tree wells and landscape fingers should be incorporated into the design of the parking area. A median strip between the parking stalls may be used instead of the tree wells. 6. Dense landscape buffer should be provided along the north and south boundaries. 7. A five foot landscape setback should be provided along the east boundary. 8. Perimeter block walls should be constructed within the Phase 2 area and permanent irrigation and landscaping should be installed with the Beryl Street right -of -way if the administration building construction has not cocmenced by the time Phase 1 is completed. The School District stated that budget restrictions, imposed by the state, have dictated the design of the project, in particular the metal warehouse. As a result of these concerns, the Design Review Committee did not recommend approva . Subsequently, the applicant submitted revised plans for further discussion. The administration building elevations and floor plan had been modified to provide greater movement of the building, particularly along Beryl. The warehouse building, however, was still being proposed with a metal shell. The Design Review Committee (Emertck, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the plans on December 3, 1987 and recommended approval of the design subject to the following conditions: PLANNING COMNISSIO1 ;AFF REPORT CUa 87 -41 - ALTA LONA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 6 I. Extensive landscaping should be provided around the perimeter to screen the warehouse building. 2. The roll -up door on the north side of the warehouse haildin9 should be deleted. 3. The spray booth should be located further to the east. Note: The revised plans were not available to be included with the staff report. They will be available prior to the Planning Commission meeting. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed e p ec on ovember 17, 1987 for compliance with City Standards. Based on this review, the Committee felt that the project could be approved subject to the addition of several conditions. Some of the conditions include: 1. Twenty -six foot drive aisles should be provided throughout the project to allow access for emergency vehicles. 2. The security gates should be equipped with knox boxes to permit emergency entry to the site. 3. The existing utilities an the project side of Beryl Street should be undergrounded. 4. Bus and truck access to the site should only be permitted down from 19th Street (rather than up from Base Line). E. Tree Removal: Associated with the development, a Tree Removal erm s necessary for the removal of three trees in order to construct the improvements on site. The two eucalyptus trees at the southwest corner of the project will be removed in order to install the entry driveway and one eucalyptus tree along the '- east boundary will be removed when the transportation/ maintenance building (Phase 3) is constructed. In keeping with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, the removal of these trees will require replacement planting with the largest nursery- grown stock available as determined by the Planning Commission or City Planner. F. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental ec s , s a as en toed several areas that may impact properties in the area. These items, which were outlined in the Land Use section, include the industrial type uses associated with the facility and the increased bus and truck traffic. With the exception of the paint booth, most of the industrial type uses, machine shop, car Tent 65hh and bus maintenance, are contained with the wareh8use rybUM79g thereoy /3� PLANNING COMMISSIOL ;AFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALLTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT 6•; December 9, 1987 R Page 7 reducing noise (assuming doors /windows are closed). Nevertheless, adverse noise impacts could be generated. The ! paint booth could be located at the east portion of the site rather than the northern portion to provide a greater separation. The increase in bus and truck traffic can be Street. By doing so. the the buses access nd trucks site a minimal 7 impact on Beryl by traveling the 350 feet rather than the 0,500 feet down to Base Line Road. The automobile traffic generated will be insignificant when viewing the present and ultimate volume of Beryl Street. The metal building and proposed land use would create an unattractive site incompatible with the residential neighborhood. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approvetne pr c , e facts to support the following findings must be made. A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the District in which the site is located. B. That the ro posed use tgether with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper an public hearing noti:es were sent t a(T properties within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission con uc a pu c hearing to receive all input and testimony on the prop,sal. If, after receiving all input, the Planning Commission feels that the design and land use proposed is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code and the Planning Co®issfon determines that the use will not have any significant environmental impacts. staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of approval. RespgmtfulI u tted, ere uller CitylPlanner l /,37 yj- ... ... . /iyj•..t �,I 1i .. .. . -. .M.iA..- *-4_. 4 'n PLANNING COM ISSIOA ',AFF REPORT ;�• CUP 87-41; A•TA LONA SCHOOL DISTRICT r; December 9, 1987 Page 8 i, ,a. BB:SH:vc j i Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization t Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C- - Phasing Plan Exhibit 'D" - ConcePtual Grading "E- N Exhibit - Building Elevations. s Exhibit 'F' - Tree Removal Plan r. x 4' J, _ /38 e, s f. lw P-0 � Q�6. LMl ® *w wKt CITY OF RANCHO CUC-kNI01GA PLA\ \I.\C D!\'LSUD : -2m o j�. o up OM mm mm r-� M VTI I ITEM: el B7 y/ TITLE S11 rav bn EXHIBIT- SCALL �L3 YT �+- i a" CITY OF RANCHO ,NGA Pl VNNI.NG Dl\,IS M TITLE: L ?.��✓ EXHIPJr: sLaLL. 1 ((0 xR G x CIT4' OF RANCFD CUC- kMO,VGA PLANNING D %, SM rrEm, - Guf y/ _ rrri.z`.:.�s-e Z EXHIBIT Z S( -AL6: /V/ a . . -Yl • t• 1L • 0�1V CITY (T RX\ -jD CUCkMaNrA PLA.NNI.'VG DIX'LS)Q\ rm\lt > MLE, t9 Tr EXHIBIT, L' 2 SC:.\LL CIT RA NCNO PIA-1k INC aC6C .tilO\GA mew �gy�— E \HINIT,- f 413 z a CITY OF RA,NC,HO CUCkkja r PLANNING DI`'6ION U2 TITI.F., rre ,/ EtHIHIT —SG4LL /YZ RESOLUTION NO. 80 -01 A RESOLUTION OY TEL PLANNING CONMIOSION OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING THE ISSUANCE OP A CONDITIONAL Val PERMIT, NO. 57 -11, To DEVILOF A SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITY CONSISTING OF AN ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, WAREBOUSB BUILDING AND TRANSPORTATION/ MAINTENANCE BUILDING ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON TEE EAST SIDE OF BERYL STREET, SODTN OF NIHLTEINTH STREET, RANCIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAHINO PIHDZNGB IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recital a. ( Alta requesting the issuanc� fc o aConditional Use permit, NO. 87 --41, to approve the development of a School district facility as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request shall be referred to as the "Application." Du , epio commission of City (ii) anchoCcamongaconduct da duly ntie dpulic hearing on the Application and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Rocitals, Part A, of this Resolution. the 2. Based upon the substantial evidence prosented to comission above-referenced public with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: acres Of The ResidentialaDistricttlocateds on the east side of Beryl Street, south of Nineteenth Street: / T Resolution No. 88.01 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site Se located within a Low Residential District and is currently developed with a church facility. The property to the south of the subject site is owned by the Applicant Alta Loma school District, is located within a Low Residential District and is currently vacant. The property to the east of the subject site is located within a Low Residential District and is currently being developed with single family residences presently under construction. The property to the west of the subject site is within a Low Residential District and is currently develcped with single family residences and certain vacant property; C. the construction of a�schoolidistrictafacilityuconsisting of law 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, including machine and carpentry shops and a spray -paint booth, a 15,600 square foot transportation/ maintenance building and related parking and storage areas. School district facilities are permitted within the Low Residential District with the approval of a conditional use permit; d. The Application as contemplated would contradict the goals a and objectives of both the General Plan and Development code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would promote a detrimental condition to the persona and properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject site, for the reasons as follows: Development Code to ellov The thepestablishment of schoolldistrictd facilities within Low Residential Districts pursuant to a conditional use permit contemplates the development of passive and low intensive facilities such as classroom sites and administrative offices The Application as contemplated conflicts with such goals and policies and is incompatible with the surrounding land uses by the requested inclusion of the more intensive industrial uses such as the transportation /maintenance building, the machine and carpentry shop and the spray paint booth; (ii) The inconsistent and incoupat bleAwithctheolow intensitya related and church facility uses immediately surrounding the subject site and would be materially detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of those persons in the immediate vicinity of the subject site in the following rospects: (1) the operation of the vehicle 1 7 T Resolution No. 88 -01 Page 3 maintenance facility, together with the machine and carpentry shop, would generate excessive noise and vibration in the area; (2) the spray paint booth would generate both unwarranted odors and potential hazardous contamination by airborne spray paint particulantst (3) necessary security lighting to protect the proposed facility would result in excessive nighttime glaro to the surrounding residential uses; and (4) evidence produced at the public hearing demonstrated that the adverse effects identified herein could not be successfully mitigated by the inclusion of development conditions; increase heavy vehi ) cle traffic from truckssand nbusesaondthosed nearby streets which are normally limited to residential traffic, thus contributing to excessive vehicle noise and vibration and a dangerous and confusing traffic circulation pattern in the immediate vicinity of the subject cite, the detrimental effects of which cannot be successfully mitigated; administrative office andTwarehouse building are aesthetically incompatible with the single family residential uses and church facility surrounding the subject site. The administration building presents a long, massive and linear design residential, which in thetimmedia a the cinity. The warehouse building is a pre - engineered metal structure which would only be allowed, if at all, in the heavy industrial areas of the city; (v) Substantial public testimony in Opposition to the Application was presented at the public hearing by existing residents in the immediate vicinity of the subject site (both by oral testimony and signed petitions), and such " public opposition and the detrimental effects identified herein will cumulatively increase due to the tact that the immediate vicinity is continuing to develop with single family residences and the site immediately t, the south o! the proposed development (owned by the Applicant Alta Loma School District) cannot be developed as a classroom school facility, thus requiring the development of further single family residences or the expansion of the proposed uses onto such site. Based 3. on e substantial this commission duringtheabov d e- referenced December 9, 19870 hearing and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in Resolution No. 88 -01 Page 4 paragraphs 1 and 3, above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes an follovs: a. The Application as proposed is not in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Development code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; b. The Application as proposed will be detrimental to tha public health, safety or welfare and will be materially injurious to properties and improvements in the immndiets vicinity; and C. The evidence presented to this Commission has identified substantial potential adverse effects associated with the request Specified in the Application. 4. Based p in paragrapha 1, 2and3,1 above, thisaca conclusions ommissionherebyadenies� the Application. S. The Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By commission IofBtthhee BityEoi Rancho Cucamonga,odotherebyncertify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, Passed and adopted by the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1988, by the following vote, to wit: 4 ti r 4 Resolution No. 88 -01 Prge 5 AYES: COMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, CNITIEA, DLAKESLEY, CNIT:EA. MCNIELa HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE .� ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE S \1]] \PCR- SOL \RC 6.2.1\ 5 S1 V — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 3, 1988 ` To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer By: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and It and issuance of a Negative 'Declaration for the 19LN Street Improvements from Nest City Limits to Jasper Street. RECONN3 ATION: It 1s hereby recommended :that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and svproving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposea 19th Street Improvements and issuance of a Negative Occlaration therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. 8lVgf0101/il /AMALYS i S. This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed 19th Street Improvements. In conformance with the California Environmental Qudlity Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above mentioned ioprovments. Said improvements generally entail street rehsbilitatlon and drainage improvements. It 1s the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant effect on the environment and therefore recrnmend issuance of a Negative Declaration. ResaectWy submitted, JR* Attachment d l5 dL Ry, t w�jv RESOLUTION NO. '7C6 A RESOLUTION CF %THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY..OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDYtAND = ISSUANCE OF A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR' THE PROFOSED 19TH STREET. IMPROVEMENTS FROM NEST CITY LIMITS TO JASPER STREET WHEREAS, 'the 19th Street Improvements as a Public Agency Project shall be subject •o amply 'with the California Environmental_ Quality Act necessary to protect, rehabilitate and enhance the environmental quality of the State; an! „ WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been. prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality act, as amended; and r WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration all the available inputs and has reviewed same concerning the proposed 19th Street Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The Cfty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves a nv r—o=cntal Assessment Initial study and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed 19th Street Improvements. Section. 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Determine oni7 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. - /S 3 EN MONNIENML REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PART I GENSM For all projects requiring enviromental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Cmmittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, tha Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study-and make recommendations to Planning Comafsslon. The PlennSngg ComntssiOn will hake one of three determtnottans: (1) The project vt11 have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Derlaration will be fiied, `2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Enviromental should bes uppliedlby th6rtppincant giving further information oncerningpthe proposed project. Date Filed• Project Title: naytn strwt Lw- ments (ftv0 westerly City ...... _�_ — _ Applicant's Name, Address, Tslephone: city of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineoring _ 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho C=5mmGa, CA 91730 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Benny K=R)nah4. m ........ _ Location Of Project: S� Exhibit `A• (Page 1 —JA) Assessor's Parcel- No.! N/A List otner pe:mits necessary from local, regional, 'state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: 5• Y evn. at i 1 't, a g :r iN Y j wu o \X L a --IDS NDn tSEDJ FRWII g i !, s �a•*�sa�ew �� r�e.� ��• s i i 1 igrIL W n s•awu� 0 IT IW" t F nxn �� � b T u � 11MQ1L ,••ta• R 1 t1i• —1 .BASE LINE,.. 4 Q�•� � � � � wrLLY � dui 1. ��� ��'• �1 �.L1�. 19 TH STREET NPROVEMENT t 1 -1A /5S M PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: widening of existing etzcet s+:ctien 19th Street iron waterly city limit to Jaspar Street. Ac -eage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, If any: NA Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information On topography, soil stability, pants (trees), land Animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the descri7MCA of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets):_ EM==cd .rzoinet wL oamcoce roar ttn waterly city limit cX Rancho _ - Qr=Mnz rJ rrmti_„+.ly to Jason Street. Fr wiid rity limit to eaoohi ±a $t12at. Lilo terralll alOpaH epvtharlvf is ir.low-Icf>ad and ennelate m,inly of native Cheparrel M= Sawhirm to Jn=r Street, tbo 22o1?rztias on each side of 19th Street - dog- Generm1,l,y r°^iflrnti.l is nn"m _ cilat hnfaNn.v =M= to OnOe apd the city of Upland E,11„ .long ton mmncsgd r rth curb 11m from the westerly city limits to 175 font rot of $nnnhir $trect- Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environm- tal impact NO 1 -2 /:5—r r//_ ;'a MILL THIS PROJECT: 1. Create a substantial change to ground contours? '. 2. Create a subitantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? M YES No X X X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designatiens7 _ 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 18 X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flasmables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 1. The south sido parkway will bo raised from 01 to 3' to provide for a.h..e park,ay qt- mtr ,.. �_ to 1-m 01212y t IPA in rF 4.-ty ;-4—,l to 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily:_ yy 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project:, 9. Estimate the amount of grading cutting and filling) reguJSedfor this project, in cubic ards:y=c removed and replaced 6 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. N/A CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this' Initial evatuat'an to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning 0ivision. Date Signature &O-y.- Title Protect Ft�rtao3r % BSI CCLbTa.TANiS, INC. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following in formation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division In order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Develop:r and Tentative Tract Ho.: N/A Specific Locatio" of Project: r EMS PHASE I PHAS'c 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single i family units: 2. Number of multiple �- family units: 4 3. Date proposed to j_ begin construction: 4. Earliest date of _ occupancy: Wdelf and / of Tentative ' S. Bedrooers Price Rarme z r EMS CM OF 1ANCE0 CM IIMNGA PART II - INITIAL STUDr z AP: LICA.`ir: City of Fenno Clr»�. n a = F=G LATE: L00 NUHDER: PROJECT: 19th str.- t».,...,,...,..,,' PROJECT LCCATION:jjCn, Wyt City :.g jj. I. ENVT CMaNTAL l2VACrS fErylanatiaa of all "Yes" and "maybe" amsaars are required an attached shears). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Ceolon. A111 the proposal bava ' significant results in: a. Unstable ground cnadicipas or in changes in geologic relationships? _ a b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction K burial of the soil? x C- Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? x _ d. The destruction, coverin; or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? - x - e. Any Pocantial increase in wind or vater aroaion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? x f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? x g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ` x h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? x 2. NvdrniOgY, pi11 the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or pariedic air emissions from mobil. AM .10 or Indirect sources? X j a. Changes In turraots, or the course of direction - .+,. of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral acroam w air quality standards? c}u:malst X Alteration of local of regional clizatic b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or the rate and amouac of surface water X 4. ii..ta runoff? Sa: a. Change in the Characteristics of species, c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood facluding diversity, distribution, or :umber i were"? X b. Reduction of the sabers of any unique, rare or endangered speclan ,r d. Change in the anoumc of surface wacae In any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water qualttyt X f. Altaration of grounduacer charaeceriszics? X r i• Change in the quantity of irevaduacers, either through direct additions or with - drawals. or through'Intarfarenee with w r aquifer? Quality? Quantity? _ x b. The reduction In tTe amount of eater other- wise availsble for public water cupplies? _ x I. Exposure of p-mple or Property, to water related hazards such a. flooding or aeiehes? _ A 3. Air DoIIity, will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or pariedic air emissions from mobil. or Indirect sources? X Stationary sources? _ X b. Datarioratina of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the Attainment of applicable air quality standards? x c. Alteration of local of regional clizatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? X 4. ii..ta Flora, will the proposal have significant results Sa: a. Change in the Characteristics of species, facluding diversity, distribution, or :umber of any species of plants? X b. Reduction of the sabers of any unique, rare or endangered speclan of plants? `_ b. Will the proposal affect existing housiag, or create a damard for additional hawing? 6. Soeio-Eeonenle rectors, Vill the proposal have aignifieane ramlca IA: A. Change In local or rvglonsl soeio- eeomvoie characteristics, Including ecomoaic or wvmercial divetatty, tax rate, and property values? X b. Wf11 project costs be,equltably distributed smog project beneficiaries, I.e., buyers, - - tax pryers or project users? X_ 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Vill the proposal have algnlfieaat results lni a. A uubstantlal alteration of the present or planned land wu of an at"? X_ b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies. or adopted plans of any govcrnnentcl entities? X c. An Impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive X reereatlnnal .. +.� -... -, .e..+ YES "AY6E W ' C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants Into an areal X ` d. Reduecfom In the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal lave significant xasults In: a. Change In the rharacteristin of spatin, including diversity, distribution, or number, of any species of anfaals7 X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endauganrd species of X c. Introductlun of new or disruptive speeias of ��• ^•'• Into an area, cr result in a harrier ' to the z1gratica or uovemeac of animals? X d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or vildlifa habitat? X 3. povvlatioe. Vill the ptapoaal have elgalfieaaL results I..;: A- Will the proposal altar the locatfan, distri- bu:ion, density, diversity, or growth rata of th.a hucum population of an areal X b. Will the proposal affect existing housiag, or create a damard for additional hawing? 6. Soeio-Eeonenle rectors, Vill the proposal have aignifieane ramlca IA: A. Change In local or rvglonsl soeio- eeomvoie characteristics, Including ecomoaic or wvmercial divetatty, tax rate, and property values? X b. Wf11 project costs be,equltably distributed smog project beneficiaries, I.e., buyers, - - tax pryers or project users? X_ 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Vill the proposal have algnlfieaat results lni a. A uubstantlal alteration of the present or planned land wu of an at"? X_ b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies. or adopted plans of any govcrnnentcl entities? X c. An Impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive X reereatlnnal .. +.� -... -, .e..+ Page . A- A disturbance to the integrity of archsaological, palecatulogical, and /or historical resources? IL 10. Health. Safes and Nuisance Factors: V111 the Proposal have signific:at resins in: a. raestica of any health hatard uL potential baalth hatardl 2L b. YES MAYYSE YO S. T=n"ort&t1=. Will the proposal have cign111tane results inr I' a. Cmeratiou of substantial additional vehicular A risk of explosion or release of hazardous movement? X b. Effaces on existing strests, or demand for !� nev street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or 'A d. demand for nev parking? X { d. Subseaacial impact upon existing cransporta- i ticu systean? e X -- — e. Alterations -to present patterns of clrcula- tion or savemt of People andlor goods? <, i f. Alterations to or effacte an present and X potrutfal weer - borne, rail, seas transit or air traffic? X f. X I- Iocreeses In traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyuliscs or pedratrlam? ..X. 9. Cultur�ge30urces. Ai11 the proposal have g. aignificaut results In- X A- A disturbance to the integrity of archsaological, palecatulogical, and /or historical resources? IL 10. Health. Safes and Nuisance Factors: V111 the Proposal have signific:at resins in: a. raestica of any health hatard uL potential baalth hatardl 2L b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? e. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous '- subs -.antes in the event of an accident? X d. An increeso Sm the comber o: individuals ar species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organises? —_ X e. Increase In existing noise levels? X f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? -- X g. The crertion of objectionable odors? _ X b. An increase in light or glare? X �S :IA�HE \O - 11. Aesthsties. Will the proposal have significant results in: a.• the obstruction or de;,radatiou of any scenic ? vista or vitvt Y b. ?ha creation of sm aeathatically offensive site? e. A cnnfLict with the objective of designated ., or potential scenic eorrldors? ._7C r; 12- Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal ve a significant need for new systsee, or alterations to the followings a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged N? C. Ceemumieatiom systems? d. Yatar supply? % ^, G. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? _. _x X. Solid warts facilities? .--� ..X b. Fire protection? - X I- Police protection? J. Schools? —� .]C k. Parks or other recruticnal Lseilitfes? 1. Y.aiatessucs of public facilities, ai incluns roads AM flood Control facilities? m. Other governmental serviccst - - —� X- D. Enemy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have algnifieant results in: a. Use of substantial Cr excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial Increase in demand upon existing saute" of energy? X- C. An increase im the demand for development of mew sources of energy? d. An increasa or perpotuaeion of the consuoption of non - renewable form of energy, whim feasible renewable sources of- energy are available? X_ a page 6 TES MAYSE MO - a. Substaulal deplatlan of any nocrenwable or scarce natural resource? X 14. Mandatory pindinas of SienifIcance. a. Does the project Lava the potential to degrade _ the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habicat of fish or wildlife speclea, _ Cause a fish or wildlife population to drop _ below sell s-iseataint 1weL. threaten to eliminate a plant or anL:al cammicj•, reduce ' the number or reacrlcc the Tanta of a rasa or endangered plant or ayf -., or,ellain +te important arampin of the major periods of California history or prahlstory? b. Does the project have the potential to aehiwe short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, envirocmantal tools? (A aharc -term Impact on the envircomamt is one which sccurs In a relatively brief. definitive period of time while long- ' term impacts viii endure well Into the future). X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually United, but cuc=lacivoly cowidarabla? (CuMU14tively considerable moans that the iucroental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed Sn connection with the affects of past projects. and probable future projacts). d. Does the project have ecvlrooxntal effects which will cause substantial adverse affects cry h-aan beings. either directly or Indirectly? II. DISCDSSI� ON GE EM rL0M RTAL EVALUATION the above questions plow aryl dlaeusalon ot(proposad•eicigaclon measurea)co - 1�Jv ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS _ t Soils L Geoloa„S. I.e. change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? The south side of the street site low with respect to the street as the curb and gutter is installed and the parkways graded. A new parkway from 0s to 31 above the existing ground will be created. The raised parkway will need to be sloped back onto the Private frontage requiring elope easement or temporary construction access. housing? e confined to poi nd regraded ty, atcomm( he installation of demand is tad. Existing hone ad to ire an additional strip a roadway widening. Access w ns as at driveways are rai the nnw a improvements. a.g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? No now hazards are created. Where pedestrians currently must use the unimproved roadway shoulder, a new paved and lighted sidewalk and parkway will be provided with a curb and planter strip to separate pedestrians from the vehicular roadway. _ Nealth safety nd NULMM e P Fore 10.h.Any increases in light or glare? New street lights will be installed where none before have existed. These will be aimed at the roadway surface and Will light what has Heretofore been a poorly lighted street. S Er . l�til ides end +t,li ssrvi ea 12.a-Electric power. p .: Along the south sides of 19th Street between Sapphire and Jasper, an estimtted - six power poles villa need, to be relocated to clear the installation of the sidewalk through - this reach of ,the project. Relocations will need to occur either through %franchise obligation, by the utility to apany, or by reimbursement, in the event that "Prior rights" are z' held by the utility,ccmpany. , 12.d.water Supply. ' Along the south side of 19t� Street between Sapphire and Jasper, water setere, vats- valves and at least one fire ' hydrant will need to be relocated to accommodate the raising of the parkway and sidewalk and curb installations. It is also noted that a row of existing irrigation stand pipes serving agricultural proportiec exists within the Public right- of-vay and will be required to be replaced outside of this public right- of -vay. 1616 III. DEMDF` (AiMf - -. on the basis of this Waal avelu+eien: aI find the proposed project Ca= Nor have a :,Iplficanc ,flee: eo the eaviroaesac, and" IM"T E DECL.UAn= will be prepared. ClC find that although the propead project could have a a16nificast tact ea the auviron ant. there will It be a sICcUlmec affect in this cane bemuse the aititatiou •easuras described on an ectstbed shout haw, been added to the project. A NEGATIVE Dv. rARAnCN NRL DE MPAXM. QI find the proposed project MAY have a sigaifieanc effect on the snvit'»vent, and as ENVIE m= �AcrREpoti is sequlred. Date 6 -2z_$Q —L( ""i SicnaNra ennnf h N it f 1 TS W s / � 7 i- :■ .}i 6j — CITY TAFF ftT�PORT cA &'tD Date: August 3, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russzll H. Maguire, City Engineer Senior Civil Enginter BY: Mike OLivler, subject: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study parts I and lI and issuance Hermosa nucita CartillatAven for 19th Street Improvements RE �_ recnmended that the City Council adopt the attached It 1s hereby roving the Envirumentat initial study parts Resolution accepting and app rovements and issuance of a I and II for the proposed 19th street Imp Notice ofgDetermt Determination pursue t to the direct the Environmental Quality aAct' PSIS: for the This reyyort presents an Environmental Assessment a wit attached document has Evlonmental quality tY Act and State � In the ttac the California been prepared to permit construction of the above mentioned lmpro sew ling Said improvements generally entail the Widening of streets, curbs and gutters, drai:age improvements, etc. It is the singineeriI* -,f ft'inf this na a that beta se mitigation eessures have been added W the Ft P1 t and therefore recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration. Resp y� tented, _ Rpii :R�a Attachment .o6 RESOLUTION NO. 7 o -qqp A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUXIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STP.EET IMMOVEMENTS FROM HERMOSA AVENUE. TO CARTILLA.AVENUE shall be subject.tohcoamply withethemCallfornnla Environmental9QualitProject act necessary to protect, rehabilitate and anhance the environmental quality of ' the State; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality act, as amended; and consideration all the available inputs the City for proposed 19th Street Improvements. NON, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: approves Section nv City Assessment Initial CStudyfandnIssuancemof a Negative Declaration for the proposed 19th Street Improvements. Section 2: The City Clerk 1s directed to file a Notice of # Determina oion pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Brief Descaaton of Project: 19th Street Improvements - The project starts at Hermosa Avenue and continues easterly to Cartilla Avenue. 2. Name and Address of A licant. City of Rancho Cucamonga x P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 3 19 0. the City of Rai eho Cucamonga has determined thatttheQabove project x will not have a significant effect upon the environment. M Envlronawntnl tepact Report will not be required. 4. Mir;.tes of such decision and the Initial Study prepared by the Cit• ,f Rancho Cucasonga are on file in the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. S. This Negative Declaration is subject to the irplementation of mitigating measures (if any) as listed on the attachments. Dated August 3. 1988 enn s L. stout _ ( 76 Kayo ' Tl e . T. r KWIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION I MOLL 5°ir MY -• PART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this and zubmitted to the Development Review Co®ittx throu the project application is made. Upon receipt of Planning Uivirioa staff will prepare Part II of the recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning C of three determinations: (1) The project will environmental impact and a Negative Declaration wil project will have a significant environmental impaci Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additio should be supplied by the applicant giving further inf proposed project. Date Filed:— Project Title 1m must be the deorrt Ion, the and make make one no .siggnnificant filet, 12) Tqe an Ltronmental dormation report M cancerning the FM Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone:_ city of nmr_ho CL rmcia Eno . 11711 11711 tla._, ...- .v_� a_ _ Naze. Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project:_ Ft. "Jra)wshi m o tar r. Enmineer I71C1 989 -1862, ext. 320 Location of Project__ sea exhibit .Aa (Paw 1 -lAl -- Assessor's Parcel. Na.: . N/A List other permits necessary from local, regional, -state and federal agencies and the agancy issuing such permits: celtraa Aomr •, I -I / 7 EXHIE3rr EKWII 19 ni STP&Fr WROVBW-W 1-1A 7cvr- 5 e- PRO.1Ecr DESC pnoi Prdposed use or proposed project: Widening of existing street section. 19th Street fran Hermosa Avenue to Cartilla Avenue. Acreage of peject area and square footage of existing and propnsed buildings. Describe the environmental sett�inj of the project site including information on topography, so stab y, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets):_ 713 Promsed ocoject consists of widening the existing street section of . th Street where acolicable to loin and match existing ultimatc street it ents. 113 land adjacent to proposed improvement slopes graduaU, towards the south, midis o?nerallv residential An egg ranch Ord small citrus grove exlsto con the north side of 19th Street east of Mayberry Avenue. MY--re is a raw of - mtr�lvottn trees nn the south aide end three walnut trees on the north sides of 14th Strx t that will le r4ntM.d to fEC414 ate the proposed construction hams removed will he repla-ed at a two for one ratio Is the project part of a larger project, one of A series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact 1-2/ 73 i HILL THIS PROJECT• YES NO I. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a subitancial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? X 3. Create a substantial change In daaand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create rhargeS in the existing Zoning or General _ Plan designations? _ x S. Remove any existing trees? Now many? 551 X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flawables or ekplosives? Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 'Rees ra oved will 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily:_ Hip 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards:_ !4f[erinls x�aro�,ed etd seo� rty50 evl 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, -_caplets the form on the next page. It /A CERTIFICATIDI: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this' initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fact-_, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Dater /O7 Si9nature_4&,,� Title rI`= 8Sl CONSLLTAHTs, nc. 1 -3/ 2 (/i IH S RESIDFNTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following informatior. should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Mme of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: N/A Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Node.* and t o: Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range 1-6 f 2/ a 1 i CM DP MAMHD CUC&MUGA PART II - natiAL STUDT Y.44IRGiOMML CHECKLIST DATE: APPLIMIrr' City of Rnndn 09MMnam rnmc DAZE: t= 3@9ER. - PRDJECrs 19th Street nWovenent PSDJLCT 10CATIDH:- Fzan 113t .73 M Cstt411e A L� I. EWIR0 2:rAL nQkCrS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached shuts). TES MAnE RD 1. Soils and Geoloev. Will the proposal have Aigniticant results in: A. Unstable groundecnditioas or in changes in geologic ralationshipst b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the Anil? c. Change in topography or ground surfaca contour intervals? X — d. The desrtuetion, covering or cadification -- _ Of any unique geologic or physical features? �- a. Any Potential increase in wind or water eicn of soils, affecting either on or off szorite conditons? _ f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? �— N g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or*rimilar hazards? X ^ h. An increase in the rate of =traction and /or use of any mineral resource? --x 2. Rvdroloev. Will the proposal have significant results in: ray', 4 '1 is a• Change In the characteristics of Species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any spectra of plants? x b Reduction of the au^�ers of any unique, tare -- _ or endangered spec lea of plants? x l77 ,ri I YES M_tYBE to a. Changes in curremta, or the course of direction Of flowing etreans, rivers, or ephemeral area" ehansela? b• Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and sno=t of surfaca water rumff? . x C, Alterations to the course or flow of flood =nears? x d. Change in the amount of surface water In _ any body of water? e• Discharge Into iutfata waters, or any alteration of surface water gvalltyT 7L f, Alteration of groundwater charaeteristicz? X- 9, Change in the quantity of grorndvaters, either through direct additions or vith- drawals, or through Interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? x h. The raduction in the ■Mount of water other- visa available for public water supplies? g i, Exposure of people or property to wares related hazards such a3 floading or seiches? X_ �. Alz Ouallty, trill the proposal have significant results in= a• Constant or periodic air emissions from tmbile or indirect sources? x Stationary sources? X— b• Daterlorstion of amblenc air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? x C, Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? — —X- 4. si cca flora, Will the proposal have sign" comic results Is: a• Change In the characteristics of Species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any spectra of plants? x b Reduction of the au^�ers of any unique, tare -- _ or endangered spec lea of plants? x l77 ,ri I e R YES w�tYg4 �p c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an arse? _ X d. !eduction in the potential for agricultural production? races. Will the proposal'have significant results In: a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of aadmals? — _- b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of sai=ls? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals Into an area, or result in a barrier to the nitration or mvememt of anlnals? �_ Y d. Deterioration or •resoval of dating fish or wildlife babicat? _ X 3. Poonlation. Will the proposal have significant results in: A. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an areal _ X b. Will the proposal affeot existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? — X 6. Soelo-Eeononte 7aeeora. Will the proposal have significant results in: A- Change In local or regional socio- economic characteristics. Sa.luding economic or fal diversity, tax rate, and property "loss? X Is. Will project costs be equitably distributed -- • among project beneficiaries, I.e., buyers, " tax payers or project users? X 7. Land Use and Plannlne Considerations. Will the proposal have elgnifieaut results In? a. A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? -_ b. A conflict with any deetgoations, objectives, Policies. or adopted plans of any tovertmental entities? X c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive X e R it ,I 7■ rS Mane ao a. ?ranseorcatioe. Will the proposal have significant results ing A. Caneration of substantial additional vehicular tl sovesent? X b. Effects an existing srreees, or demand for -- new street CGOatrettion? X ° C. Effects an existing parking facilities, -- — or demand for new parking? X a,.• d. Substantial Impact upon existing traaaporta- tien — syscaan? X i e. Alterations to prasest patterns of circula- — — '�` "On Or savessac Of people and /or goods? X f. AltoraciOes Co or effects no present and potential water -borne, rail, mass transit or air traffie? X + .— g. Increase: in traffic hazards to eater vehicles, ` bicyclists or pedestrian? X 9. Cultural gesources. Will the proposal have — significant rsanin in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological. Paleontological, and /or. historical resources? X 10. gealth. 'afen. and 8uiranee !actors; il Wa the propaaai hsva significant results Sat a. Creation of any haa1W hazard or potential health hazard? X b. Exposure of people to potestial health hazards? X_ C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? -the d. An increase in camber of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic Organisms or the exposure of people to such organlxag? a. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Expo aura of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? to The creation of objectionable odors? X_ h. An increase in light or glare? X it ,I 7■ r� wAAe so 31. Anthetics. Win the proposal have eigmificant results In A. The obstruction or degradation of aSy scenic vista or view? X b. The creation of an asachatically offeas Y4 , site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or pocancial scenic corridors? 12. Ucilitirs sad Public Services. 4211 the proposal have a slgmi£icant need for new Systems, or alteration to the following3 A. Electric power? X b. Natural or parkagsd gear X C. CoomuroirAtion systase? -- X d. Water supply? X a. Wastewater facilities? X f. Flood control structures? —_ X g. Solid waste facilities? X b. Fire protection? - X I. Police protection? -- X �. Schools? X k. Parks or other recreational faclUc ft? r X 1. l9lntensr;ea nf poblie facilities, including _' roads at.d flood control lacillties? _ X m. Other governmental services? —_ • 17• Euerry and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have Significant results Sr: _ __ ..X.- a• Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing _ -- Sources of energy? e. Am Increase in the demand for development of new acute" Of energy? iL d. An increase or perpetuation of the ran:umption of non- reutwable forms of energy. when feasible renewable sources of&energy are available? X _ go r YES MAYBE N0 A. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? X C" 16. Xandatory Fiudinta of Bisaifican -e. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade •.ry the quality of the eavironment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife apecisa, Cease a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to elixiaata A plant or animal rouavairy, reduce Mu the number or restrict the range of a rare or Y'1 aadangered plant or animal or eliminate �i Importanc Maples of the major periods oZ qY California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potnWl to achieve shore -tare, to the disadvantaga of lom% -term, savirannastal goals? (A short -term impact on the as environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long - •, term impacts will endure well into the future). X C, Does the project have i=Pacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (C=ulativalY tonaidurable meaaa that the incremental effects of as individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with the affects of put projects, and probable future projects). X d. Dona the project have eavironmaatal affects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X II. DISCOSB X OF DMnOMI —"TAL ZVA1DAYfON (i.e., of sf£irnative answers to the above questions plus A discusaicn of Proposed • mitigation measures). Ap co ately fifty five eAsdng trees will be remrved during the street widening process. It is the City of Cucaucngs'a directive that said tress win be replaced at a two f= cne ratio. z% �'Ik� ENVIRONHERTAL MACTS i.c. Change in topography or ground surface contours intervals? The south right -of -way lies below the street grade Leaning as the new parkway Sa constructed that a o to 4- high embankmOnt is created. This will croat the need for a new embankment fill and driveway transitions. HvdrolpME 2.b. Changes in absorbticn rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? 3 c. Alternatives to the course or flow of flood waters? Currently drainags along the south side of 19th street flows to the southerly lying properties. will beacontainedoand transmitted curbs and additional street flow Hanover an and Drainage. The increase in additio al street flows to these two streets Would seem Insignificant. Soho - v.... -, paw 6.a Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? A strip of frontage Will need to be acquired from each of the fronting properties either by purchase or by voluntary dedication. Thereafter, frontage amenities will be completed. The lose of property is compansable. The addition of street amenities is usually considered value adding to the existing properties. b will the project coats be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e. buyers, tax payers or project users? Systems Development Funds already collected from developments having occurred in this community, will be used No direct costa to any single party is noted. The expense of these funde seems consistent with the purpose for which those funds were collected. s.d. substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? •' Jj, - 9.0. Alternatives to.present patterns of People and or:goods3 : of circulation of aovement 19th Street is ,currently designated as a State Highway and carries comideiable traffic. Portions of the 'street such as the noted project reach exists 'as a -two lane rurel street linking sections of 4; -lano streets through the city. The Project in an o! itself will not ganerate traffic'yat the removal of this subst�nderd link of 2 -lane highway may attract additional usage. Such usage will continue to ralleling Poothil. increase until the complotion of the pa y just north of the project area. HQalth Safety and w+ +� 10.h-An increase in light and glare. The project will include the construction of missing street lighting through the length of the project. This ua is viewed as supplying minimal safety or convenience lighting for the street and are being aimed at the street surface. /83 rs .. _.._ +y.. i` :�N_ � d; oA "r, -1, w• .�,. ..�<. � � _ .�i ��.. =yFrw R;s�,44;1 i III. DETEI EMT10, f .. On the baals -Ot,this lultial avaluation� On the �iprtoo�p1oms� project 000LD AO'f have a slinificaat affect . and a =ATM D 103 vLU be prepared. Dtffa� On thatLa thnn`h the proposed Project could have a alsnil2canc in Chia ease eavlromear, there viii not be a stra"leane effect 6ahaysa the added on swsures described on an attached sheet have been added to the Project. A MAME DECIAEAylOg V= EE YEEYABED. QI find the Proposed project mAy have a si`nifiraoe affect oo the aavSzment. and am EMRO'DD'-R PMh= EEYOET Sa or affec Data A, /. ESanacure late T 11 Fne1n r Titia DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 1 -- CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 3, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - SNITH - fees for utilfty nundsrgroendingeCand n (2)qu offitte street Improvements for the development of a 20 unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APR 207 - 251 -22 I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomwends that C1V Council sustain the Planning Commission's action and approval of DR 88 -03. II. BACKGROUND: On June 22, 1988, the Planning Commission unanimously approved DR 88 -03. As a part of the approval, conditions consistent with City Standards and policy were imposed. The applicant is appealing three (3) Engineering requirements as listed in his letter of appeal attached. The conditions pertain to: 1 Off -site dedications and street improvements (Condition No. 1); 2. Utility undergrounding fees (Condition No. 6); and 3. Sidewalk construction (part of Condition No. 1). includedi Itemf (3)a ie iiatemo (1); he t hePreanfonrie 9 itemst ( )wand (it ltlbe discussed together. III. ANALYSIS: A. Engineering Condition No. 1 - Street Improvements: 'The construct cllin e necessary right-of-way fuwidthImprovemen for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site �OJ I CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OR 88 -03 - Smith August 3, 1988 Page 2 4 northerly to the existing dedicated portion of Sierra Madre Avenue prior to issuance of building permits. Sidewalks shall be constructed along the west side and shall cover the entire parkway from S the block wall to the curb. The developer is eligible for reimbursement for the cost of construction of the ofr -site improvements upon development or redevelopment of the adjacent 'Prorated The ated onA net t e acreage basis (m nus street dedication) for the benefited properties." The portion. of Sierra Madre to be improved is shown on Exhibit 'C'. Staff feels the construction a..d dedication of the off -site Improvements are necessary and appropriate for the following reasons: 1. To provide an adequate continuous public street access constructed to City Standards to the project which allows for e City Maintenance to assure the quality of the roadway along its entire length. This is the main access street for the proposed development. 2. To provide a finished aesthestic appearance to the street leading to the project. 3. To contain drainage flowing southerly from the existing portion of Sierra Madre within the public right -of -way. 4 The west side of Sierra Madre is adjacent to the existing apartment complex. Therefore, the 5 feet of sidewalk to cover the entire area between the wall and the curb is needed for maintenance and pedestrian purposes. If the sidewalk is not constructed with to street improvements, weeds and debris will become a problem in the parkway area. 5. The Developer is eligible for reimbursement upon the future development /redevelopment of the off -site property fronting Sierra Madre Avenue. The area is zoned Medium High Residential 14 -24 DU/AC. Therefore, development or redevelopment of the property is expected. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OR 88 -03 - Smith August 3, 1988 Page 3 The Developer did not stato In his appeal letter the reasons for his Objection to this requirement. However, in previous conversations with staff and at the Planning Commission meeting, he was primarily concerned with the Improvements and the acquisition of dedications for the portion fronting the most northerly 2 parcels (Nos. 19 and 20 on the exhibit). He has stated that this portion is currently paved. Also, the properties are currently developed with single family residences and not likely to redevelop In the near future. Therefore, he is not likely to be reimbursed for the improvements costs. The Planning Commission felt that the off -site improvements were necessary, but was somewhat syzpathetic to the Developer not being reimbursed In a timely manner. The use of System Fees to assist the Developer was suggested; however, this would not be an appropriate use of System Fees. System Fees are to be used for improv-ment of streets, bridges, etc. that provide a major city-wide benefit. Tilts portion of Sierra Madre will only benefit four properties and primarily the proposed development. Also, at the Planning Commission meeting, the Developer did ask for clarification of the sidewalk construction limits (No. 3 in his appeal letter). The condition as shown in his letter was deleted and the references to sidewalks included in Condition 1. Sidewalk was retained on the west side of the street and limited to the length of street to be constructed (from the site north to the existing alley). In addition, the requirement to construct sidewalk on the east side of the street was deferred until the development /redevelopment of the adjacent properties. B. Engineering Condition No. 6 - Utility Undergrounding Fee: "An 1n -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad cocounlcation lines) within the A.T. d S.F. Railroad easement shall be paid to the City ftior to the Issuance of building permits. The fee shall be half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project site.' This requirement 1s consistent with standard Planning Commission Policy. The issue was discussed by the Planning Commission. and it was determined that there were no particularly unusual circumstances as;oclated with this development to warrant a waiver of the policy provisions. Yr z CITY COUkCIL STAFF REPORT OR 88 -03 - Smith' August 3, 1988 Page 4 The fee rill be approximately $3,150 ($2,715 per acre) which is a very minor amount compared to many other projects within the City. Respect' fitted, e �- .BK:s Attachments: 1) Appeal Letter 2) Exhibit 'A': Location Map 3) Exhibit 100: Site Plan 4) Exhibit `C': Off -Sfte Improvements 4) Planning Commission StAff Report 3 Minutes h� ' i v 0 M P A `J Y — 1 June 23, 1988 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline Road, Suite 8 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Attention: Planning Department RE: EMRObMNTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - SMITH - Tha development of a 20 unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land in the Madium -High Residential District (14 -24 duelling units per acre), located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APN: 207- 251 -22. To Whom It May Concern: This letter is an appeal for the above referenced project from the Planning Commission meeting of June 22, 1988. The items for appeal are as follows: Engineering Division (1) The developer shall obtain the necessary right -of. way and construct full width improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site northerly to the existing portion of Sierra Madre Avenue prior to issuance of building permits. The developer is - - all for reimbursement for the cost of construction of the off -site improvements upon development or redevelopment fo the adjacent property. The amount of the reimbursement will be prorated on a net acreage basis (minus street dedication) for the benefited Drenertt.._ RECEIVED JUN 24 1988 -xv OF RANOMO Co .1 (1) ENCIMLERIMC DIVISION /� 9 ARCHIECnAAL PLANNING& DES*ar, M7i.atCrseyp AK.91R At ... RiJL•in n r�,r..�. �...... •• ■ + a t •. x; (2) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undorgrounding of the existing overhead utilities k. (railroad communication lines) within the A.T. & 'c S.P. Railroad easement shall be paid to Chn City fS` prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project site. (3) Sidewalk shall be constructed for the entire length of Sierra Hadre Avenue. The oast side shall be 6 feet curb adjacent. The west side shall g be 6} feet in width to cover the entire parkway area extending from the existing wall to the curb. We appreciate pp your time and cooperation as we look forward to meeting + with the City Council at the earliest possible time. Sincerely, A. E. SMITH COMPANY Alan E Smith (2) qd a'+ew¢tnt+ntpaN;r*aoesr"G CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DDwMO,% (g/ N ITEM: DR 8B -03 APPEAL TITLE SITE UTILIMITION CITY OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA ��-) 8 , =D nm& g R 88 -0�EA L TrrL& SITE PLAN ,, 8 u w lO 2 C I:. -+ u Q ` 17 13 z .a© a 0 A'WN ve coil 3.06 AC 14 fr 77; yv A ' $�'-- - MAIN ate, � Ols I ©se 1 Ora I as R— - R. i A.-- T - LEGEN D ® EXISTING PAVEMENT 0 REQUIRED OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS rV CITY OF ITP.H: DR 88 -03 N APPS L RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trrm oif -SITE TMPRWEMENTSy ENGINEERING DIVISION. 1� 3 Ennrr. s:r 0� i 1 r Levy, Rancho Cucamonga resident, questioned 1f seur ,late facility, q this would be a maxlyn Nr. Pinkerton advis t the facility would house limates. He furthar state this fecilit to maximum level security specifications. esigned to meet maximum 'here were no further publ ants. Nr, Krouttl ed the Co ®tssion's comments and advised tha f would inclu LammfSSlon'S concerns relative to lighting, landswpin rld ng material in the list of concerns to the County. PUBLIC HEARINGS E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - SMITH - The eve.opment o e 0 t tm un aparent comp ex on acres o an in the Nedfum -High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling volts per acre), located 2'2. t the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APN: 207 -251- Otto Krautil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Plan Smith, applicant, asked that the requirement for a spa /Jacuzzi be eliminated. He felt that the site was too small to provi'e this featare. He Pointed out that Planning condition 3(d) Called for a decorative block wall and stated that his understanding at the Design Review Committee was that a wrought iron fence could be used along the north pI•operty line to minimize graffiti. Mr. Smith objected to the condition requiring installation of curb and gutter along Sierra Madre in front of the three Parcels not owned by this development, as well as street improvements to the entire street. He additionally objected to installing sidewalks the entire length of Sierra Madre He also objected to the required in -lieu fee for undergrounding overhead utilities wlthia the railroad easement. He pointed out that-the lines are loo feet from his site, and felt the responsibility to underground should be that of the railroad. Mr. Smith asked for clarification of Standard Condition N 2 and asked if the intent was to relocate existing utilities only on his site. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman McNiel asked the Engineering Division to respond to Mr. Smith's comments Planning Commission Minutes / -3. June 22, 1988 F a: t A" Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, clarified that Standard Condition N 2 would pertain to utilities on site. In response to the sidewalk Issue, Mr Hanson suggested that Engineering condition 7 be eliminated and that Engineering condition 1 he modified to clarify that sidewalks would be constructed along the west side of Sierra Madre and be required to cover the entire parkway from the block wall to the curb. He advised that the in -lieu fee for utility undergrounding was a standard Planning Commission policy regarding properties abutting the railroad. He advised that staff had required Sierra Madre to be improved to assure the street was brought up to current City standards and to provide a more aesthetic look to the roadway. He pointed out that after the necessary testing, it may be possible for the developer to do less than total reconstruction. He further advised that the condition provides for reimbursement upon redevelopment of the adjacent parcels. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated that the Development Code requires projects of this type to provide recreational amenities. Based on this requirement, the Design Review Committee felt that some type of active recreational amenities should be added. Commissioner Chitiea further clarified that even though this was a small project, the Committee felt that it should provide some recreational amenities. Therefore, the Committee determined that a spa /jacuzzi would be more in scale with this parV ular project. Commissioner Tolsto statec re would prefer to allow the developer some flexibility in determining what type of recreational amenities to add to the project. His preference would be to have the developer work with staff on this issue and bring the results back to the Design Review Committee on a Consent Calendar basis. Commissioner Chitiea advised that the Design Review Committee had suggested that the developer provide an alternative, however he chose not to provide one. On the issue of the block wall, Commissioner Chitiea stated that the color of the block should be compatible. She concurred that the use of wrought iron with decorative block pilasters along the north property line was discussed at Design Review, and suggested that this option be added to Planning condition 3d. Commissioner Tolstoy addressed the street improvement issue and concurred with staff that Sierra Madre should be brought to City standards. However, because of the length of the street and the fact that a prrtion of the street has been paved as a private access way, although in need of repair, he felt that the City should provide save assistance with the street lmprovemen:. He did not think it likely that the developer would be reimbursed from the adjacent Parcels, since he coisidered redevelopment of those parcels unlikely. He suggested the use of systems fees. Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 22, 19e' Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, advised that the Inning Commission could not commit City reimbursement for the street repair, uvt could recommend that action to the City Council. William Silva, Deputy City Engineer, advised that the State Subdivision Map Act, which regulates systems fees, stipulates that systems fees are to be used on major arterials. Since Sierra Madre is a local street, it would not qualify for the use c• systems fees. Commissioner Emerick supported Coaaimsioner Tolstoy on the street Improvement Issue. He supported the Commission policy of the in -lieu fee for utility undergrounding within the railroad easement. He concurred with the requirement for a spa /Jacuzzi and felt it was important for a project of this size to provide a feeling of community. Commissioner Slakesley was not a particular proponent of spas and felt the developer should be given flexibility to provide an alternative to the recreational amenity requirement. He concurred that Sierra Madre should be fully improved and brought to City standards. He supported City assistance with the street improvements If it is available; however, the street should be fully improved whether or not that means exists. Commissioner Chitiea concurred that Sierra Madre should be fully improved. She considered the in -lieu fee for utility undergrounding appropriate and consistent with Planning Commission policy. She supported the vequiremert for the spa /Jacuzzi and pointed out it would take less space and would not cause the aesthetic impact of a volleyball court or hardscape type of recreational amen'ty. She did not consider the fees to be unusual for this type of project and stated that the applicant has the appeal process available to him should he wish to appeal to the City Council. Chairman McHiel stated the street improvements are necess,ey to hring Sierra Madre up to current code. Relative to reimbursement, he felt it would be more appropriate to leave the condition as written. The applicant would then have the option to appeal the item before the City Council. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Emerick, to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Development Review 83 -03 with modifications to regaire to spa /Jacuzzi location, size and design to fie. reviewed by the Design Review Committee; modification to Planning Condition 3d allowing the option of a wrought iron fence with decorative block pilasters along the north property line; modification to Engineering condition 1 to add 'dedicated" to the existing portion of Sierra Madre and inclusion of the requirement for a sidewalk to be constructed along the west side of Sierra Madre which will cover the entire parkway from the block wall to the curb; and, deletion of Engineering condition 7. Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission H1n,ites -5- June 22, 1988 ^ -r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMERICX, BLAkESLEY, CHITIEA, KCNIIEL NOES: COKMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -26 - MODIFICATION - OAS - The request to sodi a condition o approve regarding rec pro Cal access for an ,,.pr .d ecialty shopping center located at the northeast corner of Fo ill Bo evard and Vineyard Avenue - APH: 208- 101 -10, 11. Brad Belle City Planner, presented the staff report. , Chairman McNie opened the public hearing. There were no co nts, therefore the public heart was closed. Motion: Moved by Ch tea, seconded by Blakesley, to ap co the modification to Conditional Use Pe t 87 -26. Motion carried by th following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: C4ITZGLAKESLEY. ILK, MCNIEL, TOLSTO Y NOES: COMMISSIONERS: N ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS NONE - carried G. MODIFICATION NO. I TO CONDITI 12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - four major retai, buildingC totaling 335, square feet, adjoining mall shops totaling 132,228 square feet, nine atellite retail buildings totaling 42,500 squapir feet, two satellite floe buildings totaling 25,b22 square feet four restaurant pads, an a 30,000 square foot theater. Concep 1 approval for a design c.n consisting of ten buildings total 19S,E60 square feat. All on 71 as of land in the Community C rcial District of the Terra Vista nned Community, locateo at a northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foot IlBoulevard.-_ /Mel 21 -0 5, 06 and 13. ociate Planner, presented the staff report. opened the public hearing. resenting Western Propertias, gave an overview of t Planning Commission Minutes -6- % June 22, 1988 i. :f 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 22, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EWZRO94ENTAL ASSESSNUT AJD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - e eve opmen o a un apar[men coq ex on 7 08 —acres or land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), located At the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APH: 207 - 251 -22. I. PRWECT AND SI!L DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re ested: Approval of Site Plan, Conceptual Grading an, u n9 elevations, and issuance of a Neative Declaration. g B- Protect Density: 18.52 dwelling units per acre. C. aur� - singe Fam y s en fai; Medium -High Residential South - A.T.23 �11Ra11road and units nrVacant; Medlua -High Residential (114 -24 dwelling units per acre) East - Sinlyy1le Family Residential; Low Residential (2 -4 West - Nil tltFaamilit� eve acre) Y its per Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Desf nations: ro ec - a ' um 9 Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per North - Medium-Hlgh Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and East - Low Residential ial(2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium -Hfgh Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) PLAnNING commissI0N STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82-03 - SRI IN June 22, 19d8 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant vith an average soy: ofZ percent from northwest to southeast. There is an existing 10 foot wide water easement along the east project boundary and a 15 foot wide sewer easement along the south project boundary. In addition, a 15 foot storm drain easement is being required along the south boundary for a future faster Plan storm drain pipe. F. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Ratio Required Provided Two Bedroom 1.8 spaces 36 36 Apartzent (20) per unit (1 covered) (20) (20) visitor 0.25 space per unit 5 5 Total 41 41 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 20 two - bedroom un"Es— 808 square feet in area. The units are located within two -story structures on the western half of the site. The eastern half of the site is comprised of one -story garage structures and open parking. The Development Code requires that structures within 100 feet of single family residentially zoned property be limited to one story in height, thus the location of the residential units on the western half of the property. Access to the site will be provided from Sierra Madre Avenue extended down from the north to provide a cul -de•- sac within the project boundary. Miin Street, located to the east, will be designed to provide emergency access only and the existing street will be redesigned to provide a codified cul- de -sac. 8. Desi n Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Emerick, recommended that the evwd the proposal on MAy 5, 1989 and project be redesigned to address the following concerns: 1. Buildings •A' and 'B" should be shifted to the north to allow tree planting between the buildings and the storm drain easement along the south boundary. m F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8843 - SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 3 2. The sidewalk between Building 'B' and the garage should be relocated within the storm drain essement extending down from the cul -de -sac in order to provide tree planting along the edges of the easement. 3. The common oppen space between Buildings 'B' and 'C' should be redesigned to locate the arbor adjacent to the tot lot and to provide more usable open space. 4. The rear elevations of the buildings should be redesigned to create more breaks /interest, similar to the front elevations. S. The garage elevations (front and rear) should be redesigned to break up the building mass. - 6. Patio fencing should be redesigned to create a more open feel. The applicant subsequently submitted revised plans which were reviewed by the Design Review Comittee (Chttiea, Kroutil) on MAY 19, 1988. The Ccemittee felt that addietonal revisions should be incorporated into the plans to address the following concerns: 1. Relief should be provided to the garage to the form of a hip roof to tie to with the buildings and create more interest. 2. Additional artation should be provided in the roof element along the rear elevation of the buildings. 3. A spa and /or wading pool should be provided. On June 2, 1988, the applicant again provided revised plans for Deslyyn Review Co®ittee review. The Committee (Chitlea Esrerfck Kroutil) reviewed the revts ans an reco®en e a rove o e ro ec su ec e o I Owing con ons; I. A spa /jucuzzi should be provided. 2. The roof 'eyebrows' on the rear elevation of the garage should be enlarged to be more in scale with the building Or should be deleted. �W I 9 PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 4 w v C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the proposal on major concern of the Committee centered around the dedicated access from Sierra Madre Avenue. Currently, there is an access easewlt provided from the current terminus of Sierra Madre to the north extending down into the site. The Technical Revler Committee J, asked the developer to obtain the necessary right -of -way and to construct the improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the f project site northerly to the existing portion of Sierra Madre Avenue. This has been added as a condition of approval. D. Envlroomental Assessment: The applicant has completed Part I o e n a u Staff has completed Part II and determined that the proposed development will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. If the Planning Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. V III. FACTS FOri FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General an an ve opment Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and Site Plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a Re ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a proper owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve eve opment Review 88 -03 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions, and issue a Negative Declaration. s ally su tted Bra Bu City 7 ner BB:SM:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Ma Exhibit "B" - Site Plan P Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "0" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions aa/ �1 r / 'U I f� jilt \ rk LJ ` EIQ�Xy1 W t CITIF ()F RANCHO CI:C-k.�iO PL.k\ \I\C DW SM O 0 V VI 1HTI ITEM, TITI.F.: EXHIMT: 5(ALL boa I 1 i i � a 1 t If ;`l :{ j J suyn � t L c[j f a �. � f : �I� � •y tl %. i' I � - - .M -• . �_. . NTII CITY OF RANCHO cUC-k.Nip\G,.� ►TENS PL-,\\I\G DIN -ISM TITLE: � EXHIBITS O 5LhL - 3 i a S CITI' of RANCHO CUCk.NIO.NX;A PLA \ \i\G DI\'LSM \� lltTl ITE.NI. tie Ttrt.F• QxCEar 6.�ddsE, F\ IRIT,-- _SCALL 4; R f 1. yW d 'a a� CITY OF RAXHO ib CUCAMONGA PLA\NI.N(; p(�ISCN Sy i MIS -� -� TM.Ef �7'LG•fC Fi - -- CITY OF RANCHO CL'G1.Njo PLANNING DI1'LSM rrENb Gae/3�Q� TM-E- F- XHIBIT, D- 2— �---'- 4 CITY OF RA.\,CHO CUCA.NI0NUA RAN.Nl.\c DIVMM TM.e, Mil s E�CHIBIT d' 3 ALL, S i 3� 3 -a fl e RESOLUTION N0. 88 -117 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW M0. 88 -03, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 20 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. LOCATED AT THE TERMINUSES OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND HAIN STREET APM: 207- 251 -22 A. Recitals. (I) Alan Smith has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 88 -03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request Is referred to as 'the application'. ` ( Of RanchoCuc t f amon5aconductedameeting B L p on thtapplicationn and iconcluded said meeting on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 1. 8. Resolution. Planning HOW, THEREFORE, it Is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Co= SSIOA of the City of Ran -.ho Cucamonga as follows: set forthlin thelRe italalis. Part A eof thislResolutionnarettrueaand correctacts during the abe ea referenced meetingaoneJunen22,p1988. inclutts oral staff reports, this Commis ston h ding rrlen and ereby specifically finds as follows: terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and MainpStreetvand isp presently located acant; and for residentialbuses. The pr property toethernorthaand eastwIsvdevelopednwith single family residences. The property to the west is developed with a condominium project. The property to the south is designated and developed with railroad tracks operated by A.T. 5 S.F.; and complies withltall minimum redevelopment Standards of the Cucamonga; fof approval, Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) The development of 20 apartments on 1.08 acres of land is consistent with the Medium -High Residential land use 08 acres o la the Development Code and the General Plan, ao8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 80. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, Ig88 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the set forth in paragraph specific findings of facts concludes as fe110M4: 1 and 2 above, this Comeission hereby finds and (a) That the proposed project 1s consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use 1s in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the of purposes a d the district in which the site is a. (c) That the proposed use is to compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the Public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements In the vicinity. been 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has pualityvActeof 1970 and,rfurthe ., thisnCmmdissioo hereby Issu snarM gative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below nd in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning o_ Division (1) A spa /Jacuzzi shall be provided. The location, thee Design Review Committee prior o the issuance of building permits. (2) The roof -eyebrows' on the rear elevation of the garage shall be enlarged to be more in scale with the building or shall be eliminated. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (3) The following items shall be incorporated Into the final landscape plans which are subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits: - ao� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. DEVELOPMENT REVIra 3S -03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 3 (a) Accent treatment shall be provided at the entry off Sierra Madre Avenue. (b) Extensive landscaping shall be provided along the site boundaries, particularly the north and east boundaries. (c) A sample of the texturized pavement material shall be submitted. (d) A decorative block wall shall ba provided along the south property lines. A wrought iron fence with decorative block pilasters 0 a decorative block wall shall be required along the north property line. In addition, the existing walls on the east and west shall be upgraded to provide a decorative treatment, such as stucco with a (e) The limits of any easements and their restrictions on landscaping Shall be clearly delineated on the plans. (a; A final acoustical analysis shall be provided to address potential noise impacts from the A.T. 6 S.F. Railroad and any necessary mitigation for exterior and Interior noise levels. The analysis shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Planner or!or to the issuance of building permits. Engineers_ no`ision (1) The developer shall obtain the necessary right -of- way and construct full width improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site northerly to the existing dedicated portion of Sierra Madre Avenue s f hall be constructed the west and shall coder the entire parkkay from the block wall to the curb. The developer is eligible !or reimbursement for the cost of construction of the off -site improvements upon development or redevelopment of the adjacent property. The amount of the reimbursement will be prorated on a net acreage (minus street dedication) for the benefited Properties. �-� U t PLANNING CMXMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - ALAN SMITH W June 22, 1388 Page 4 (2) Storm drain facilities shall be constructed and in easement provided to convey flows from Sierra Madre Avenue through the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (3) A 15 foot easement for the future master planned storm drain shall be dedicated along the south Property tine of the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (4) The storm drain easements shall be accessible by City vehicles. Landscaping within the easements shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (5) An easement over the internal driv-s aisles shall be provided to the maintenance y ensure Cit vehicles to the City Cestorm r drain easements. (6) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad communication lines) within the A.T. 8 S.F. Railroad easement shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project site. (3) Main Street abutting the east property line shall be completed with a modified turn are`ind (18 foot radius) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. _ . APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. _ PLANNI:Z1, SSIONf�OF THE CITY OF WHO CUCAMONGA BY: _' 1 )— _ _-i 1 1) .`'�°„ °�_r`.:s LL. "r,�4'v {RV,'t+i.� - - - � -' ".4•1'�°r4•' --fi _ _- - _�,,, ^yiS�'� %��ti• - °�'4:°£ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 - Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the`fOregaing Resolution was duly and CityloflRanc oreCueaanng, at passed. anduadopted of the Planning Coamiss enfheld 0n the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE a/a 0 AAI1KOI O MoodlR SgjVDA W STAOLW Cool11feS SOUItI: A} A17l1 CAN t/ /�� SOCA1104: I". toad CMs•N ray calltfr of e1MM1. "FliuAm UWL CM ACT TOL K"IK 01 sIS1011 rag CMKIAW, YITO 1OC nUMISG Cow TIOIIS1 A. It./ Slits Y 1. =81 shall eyim. gains ".tweed y W musty caeuslm. It WIL to Maq.lr�tj Brits fm W yu Nne 4a gat csruCN yportl. Ooso101seot/Walp b. /e Wll b KCgiltbd par u AIira.11 of TnGtlr Tract b. la puled ttajKt to W arynnl of d. Tools gpasel Wll tar With W *Mlcut we WII ooKef gold a naafe of aWssmU r If W oogalmst youtle wmt, yos f. prow to e/pem1 aed rOCretle It w flrl 'W. r par to lure" N b11Ny OeratG. odso r 1tMMsom ay It .thin, dittos artlmcttir he all OINCted Sc000sl Outricu WII b t.lslttee W good Ilalarbrat of caraltl bwlyest ed1O stattl mt '40 to I A"I facilities an r will b cyylo of aaYeYtly so is tom raW y not pojKt. S0 Uttw r cwtltlutlr em b.e WOO flame by too School 0ut'lct Would AlmttyS� Ittl) tys Mr to the IIYI aft Armal ldrW use of W tJ1l./tlu m1 w InwKe of pMtt la ue use or all anw m1YKU1 pajKU. -1- ✓t. in G vFZK('r xo- -494!rl3 Kthtlmlw.r So v n11110 ,{ tanl M, btM llllitlla Yttal aKautr {dw1 _ Stu .. ,.0 ,q. 1. 74 tIG WII b Omloted G arcfr6atf Nth W YI/aM llu pm os IIG G fb IIr is im. fb cWllltlrt feGlm bnu. M oomlms K11�1 MII<gtlYf. Mr G 4 M N as pyKt i1G r Wll b uyldtod t. WCrKN gg C tll YNItfm K ctl.pcl wtlslKllr of co, City, Ilse . �_• IIrIS" CIG yylmKraasdssf W Lall /ly clnttlYC G[C.p.flly 111 W Ittess'01r111 A Wll W Wa1tul Ir moth M 4 61 U Mr b Inure N W lrle IWflla. 1 All ou most. pNty IIYC. IY/CCye W In1Ntum Ilul, W fl r of a, p�aalC t4II M CmN1YW M CYCIatYry Mr G O,rm,k K, MINaO G loth a Stymy posit. tm r .j the case N • ma 1st�i01111. alw' ow G IIYI Y/ aa/.e .1 G rltfeser cures font. aprarN us Wt samftCN. �t• Alp &I of this n'nt 'mil mt r1Y caC011wo NU all tK11Y6 of a 11MCl�t1 CMI. all 'tor awllctlil city ONlafrn, W Millet Strait GV I �� K 1mC man G Ufoct at W t1Y of �6. This Ir{11tft W11 "to a wissr prcnt N of /anal. bssly aWr rats. IC Mlidn. A/Ia1Y111U %,11 sl ac /Kanli6 —G Ilse W.tly rsfa by "nut Mrs's Inn, SSrmra�ttt W "dim fo Imlt At me ite of cmuKtum of Ib CIUKt- A dml t ollceYt w sath Wll b atlmN y ue Mer Ia Saga K WIINy pNU. �.• A runty &-Site aI1 tlY "All W srelltw for n.i& W •6141 bent giant ee 0111uw Orl,r " to. y INI ead NI t W 1 W/ 1 "Icale a /1e, II1rlballs, loans, M rl,w of nIY•41M. W n rot t0 alnetaly •flat Wart peprttel. 1. 11 ro cNtnllaN V•n m"talta W Peestwe, all Vat, site wlt M Ir fries son. n I"IrIM'1 Mies N •11 eal"Ialas "I41rl ar ear I. 'NY mNUClels) an nplrtd yea suit Y eala4 y a { Ir[ iiurrr `rte ca oln calla N•v YaVottlM MW'yyWt is oil, 01Oslas. Laal1Y MIT So n am I by W IIWI" �f. All pane Pear[" otlllt,,,,Q cal col a•a as VWf erors 'MIT Y uraat cat of P,,11c al& of W w" ea1141" •m W "spet•ly Wslae, lay�aaesW M• r caatwllY oI CYtea" r carry rlla. 10. Street Mart .If N ea.lerl •M ohrae4 ► W C14 Ft~. la Kcrraa Nn W •r/ta1 Strrt Ilrty h1I INf 4 ApMYal W oo"neslir " ae s l lrrt Ahe. Zoo. All Wllll"q wren A" I"olaal wits "All Y IlastltlN la floor W coastal, n"nr, locl"I" Propr Illrlwtt ". 1 :. tar.ply� M patr flows sryiemlr Tnnc sun Y �"ronalW +4114 o9orrs"t" V•Ill PIP too, Us M M tt trim rajaill rin A a ' lbalsl trail at, leafy W Say'Mini, 4 Zia= Nn Litj F/ eryrtlrlY ball ttu4rA MYINa, suit as fWItW for mfr W 1, a //Nraogal " W gWINNOrlrlus plc to o/rorl YI "tsraSon of 460 laa"y faclas &AM M• cave Ono uVwit"4Ml11, fimt tope " is. Il. W Co.araos, CWl.lal W Ant ictt "t 1CCY'al'ball wt Peolleil the lMeP"fN of 0"1" "twit, o"M miss re"Iterats far a• talsl.l&law "Its ".Mine aetift Y!`ry• 1a/I LIIA YWIC NtWt W aea "ties of gpallaO " boards a/ Said i i AYO�r'a association (ar're&"u "KYY. If. W Cantaoua CWltlaa W watrlcllYa ICCY'al W Articles of IKaryoratiw of W allowaers wsoclatl" are oWKt to W •OPraul or W pall" W CaPltaro" Oi.lsl "t W W city Atterary, Ott Yalt W mar•" CYtorreMt Na the flool My or Prlr to ISIwK• of WIIIt" pelts, AIWW Kent first. A record" COPY Sul) be Presided " W tit,. DRQIECT kp. AW e".r l$. All prtr rleulW j • AM IulauPl" WII M Otewtaetlr the ut•clatls r •trr taut .rpralwa u Finagled Sol Pr "f •f rbtauae WII M an a,C.l " ae P"Ntoat W s"IneriN Olrlalan pir to laws or tolla.0 �/• aMCeaaless loo s as .t rot 11.11[4 to -=1llw oil ' em _ am sa(e IKI i Itl4,tela •Mitts, Wt" cat WON In o11a 1� lilfWrl`IM• 11n1 1 Ns I— •ruf •n rWaM. Gnn. a.IP» "decade Ilan. 17. rlw sans anam u Mali Y Witat" far W pnpfe et •[[tatty Wt •W lot r Motif o� Salt suit baea W r �IIM. The W.ses tat r "Its fr one " 1 $.far terra nttrlctlsa f "ta"ne4 ea Y ca.u1W la a aal.ntlr at W taDCirflow rin suit "raorrl Itaerreetll Mire`~ snag low of W total we w laws " ,Wt, Ytaeal N wun ", elesClrn. Il.ttrts YI S` anew `Selecti Ncgt far Writ Nm W tail" MJK4. onan, u &Hops{ car s•ctls 11.0a04A. C. &fill" only, Mos to, got far ` fr••1 14`"111 ! al Systole M fp�hut'" -f. `a rule two or $1. All tappings VIMa`uaraMallM.`WSet at iong All he me "I., W7 taps+ Salsa oau Ilttroaire Wrryy trtt n an vvtlr.l" 1•c1aW 1 Noll.al"t comity W fill, mY. Walla Yell W PNw to lueste y &Ille1/1st W 041, " m1eM W aytrarN N Pa Nos. A. ISOW csoor.t" Npteaes W fl.tres .te rc IM a" facie}r'W law this poJece u Ir1.4 sea al." P loft" to, ref" carrell" s,are ,u a. Wall, a limes. +tee "it" atlas. am. S. &till" wits wit ""atteottw ola fin teuNat "terl'1 W dit c estnla east meal. —l. All care Mtlll•ss W aa.ttary Ar111s" wit bare W tin ads n" es"Ittr IKI" W stmt a"on, on Ialllawl Saw trio oearl f dm no one till" r lute", , Men "J" tferarate. "J " re.lr •" '"MIT 11 W City Posner plr IS Islam, at " 1141" Pintos. C. WAY" ryrytl. "n, Ilan Jell W subolitea u W eastern as a. P�u10u111s W &1 "1" Official Mr"fasaas N Wllal" " -2- 411 fn "Hit mfl" "Cartel milt po ide .arlatlon 1. <alr, nlCIM"' W onnt"lrt Stilt. A Cometils s.5-" nil h Svbu11114 u W ymonM y W Ildelng Ol.lsla ptde 4 IsterKa of btlNy /nwu. 7. 411 ml afrn,waaft". locladsf off Conditioners. wit b a«alt «ball/ Iotepot". Ylolam (rng .tar W from LLjSMt 0twtin W ttens M W .battered as y lw 5-114149 Dlalslas, (mulls Will b W I l YcIKiN Y Os11Ny IISn.9 w Pink. c oral[" "r A[cns (IMlun tq dNalis "bltN 41plagal t. 411 moral"" lot IWSnr4 ulsoft owl) bly a Mill" plslY dlonlus r p sad Wit Ceetals Y 1Ir "It aQK"t "poly Stall 11Ki "ly Carol, 2. 1n"11f14 moda1111" Slow/laa KMS Dlmltln alto WII h pn.lded nrnma"t W smloprat " non"t gnallup rin son [pros one mmtt"al em. ]. All moAi"" $Ilse$, allln, bloats, W nits mill b sirlfN pr cly .",darn. �A, All wilt mill be pmiW %to ata[tic pop bar apa"n if "anal It InS Clam 10 I"' " Yon Ira Nara of SIAS "la. S. TM Ce fttt, motions 844 setdctim, WII restrict W s "n1. .I mnatla"i leelctn a nos site "Ins mil an W plKif e scone of transportation far W o.ar soy p fbit pasty " latrtr circulation aWn onr Lee to deslpted nttr moral"" �(c/�� area&. r f. \ Any Inrltl gain WIl b uMett14 is W as A.tt by W /u"1"" Division ate S"ntll fin District bide b 1. et bitting is"Of ls. 7nlaMlll Is dr"ll od lowamo W /ni "lion #1 ". IKIWIy Slap plontul. mill So twituo far mlm eK NIMal y w floating 0111SIM pride 4 4 IssoeKe of building polls w par L SIMI ay optimal I. W u" of a Costa 'et a ifeltlaa. 3. (&Ill" trees Shlf bl "films At of pnlDle. A fm 0re.al molt, tKladl.0 a detailed plan of @.left" trial SAerfng their Smut 1«tl". Un W toga mill be ublt "4 to sad •r.14 y roe III "I5- DIrI IIa pride u agreatl M W I•1'gh tee41on ►In. sold I "a Mall toe Into Kcaeet w onfes14 Saadi". Jet unit an to h "filled. trial" aetarf, W Jean m. amt alit be plast14 Icon ryla[eaut of momw tms. ,tea. stmt tm.. ca bfr eon Is colt" tiro r lunr. wTl h Installed VIA"" I. S[[ry «e .lY 44 t of cly t danao C«aaaaP W n,ll'M IuW t stmt. ~ `easrg �' " lourlr I'M" w p' on "Urlor �. A nations so ]I I arm for o"', Kn, S�PfICS the fellply stns, N 11 ei—~d d "tote sprat «e LO ��r IPter,,�t. If Nllr,W a yyNjr�o,Aw. 57 Yd F ✓i. A Wslr N &Is of w trite plant" onto[. w dtaf slKbee an . f/ Itl Pis r larger, fond «t mill h iln'irN fari Ins, treat "Ali h Uul14 t a flu or aas Is -Plln , .r' , I "Also lulls, Yf11[Int n Yak s0 Percent CC W Owty Am at ulor son n Ame t fl. 7. Tmt mitt h N.M Y ems at Nl it u, all «rot " W CI strecto m at a n" a( eel tm fee Ill llwr feet of wild Mlt W FAIIC dalnre. so �t. All slw Issas " e «m of Ilan Isl last 1. 'artful 4dght W of 2:1 r "tor "we Wit h Ia.ivieves W ImptK /r enllon mtrol W situ their y ," n I fund: w IS -Mlle r tarter site O ono ISO W sq. it. 01 sign am. M 1-Plln r PaIe4 uasr. to WRlao, s10µ ft. of It", area. W tryrite vrttul blight W of f2l r drat 1, Intros of eight IOI feet to "rgreaW a", WII auo "gods roe 4 sin ud nrJtl� h fl "tN la Ili ilntm n nitro aKi.�n stye Ilan. 31soe Il.tlyae"Im A) WI s «tiro mill 1 «Iw a ""rant Irtlmotl. stair "M In "1114 y Ye Y[ela "r "Ion u s. All Uwe slitting W Irritation mitt h contingent,! n1aY1W to a halo W tadrly CWlll. y W drlelon, blot ea W"IWf Mft It mold W otee114 y w wlr. Mr Y nlnSly decsf.4 In name "Ils, n I4uKtlr mill h [ssdetes y W states"" 011tU" u Yung" that It Is la PtfSbKCM Consul'". �10. All I&-&0"4 Amt full h "Isulato Is a fal1Y W Yrl[Iso condition. fm Ira vasgn, Van. W gnarls. I" Front tan lassrtgfy It rCWIM W WII 101140, It • a1Nr, a" Is -Salton sin Iran, ton 46411. slit tut Intake sow" C1,e1, W a "mat Inlmotlee s "lee to " latuiled by W ae.Naper plo' to street orn"Kl, No nrfraat Wll h to addition u rryWr14 ! zIf. Ike Steel Stairs, SI0aW1G "all e leeflleaN 1IA W ►arlWO Wits, IW(cy1K Na W atte)Kt G tp "l y W 2 I am 'MIT e l ir IW1cMy l IfieW N (w NfY 111.19144. (I stw Mfn w G r".IrN by IJ. $Will IaNGp restwel pas K saNal ", Ill. /al rail. apafa tte ton. rlWrl" s11ss11S Wth 1irlNr4t nasal /IN lla4c 1 ceeepl aY q y, Is nat/M a1A" 14 Wler AM M1v cMUnNlw .t$119". SW At tpclo 1 tptim N.I I. f° M Irriptlas ), traa/et Gl wait Stilt Spot". 11101/11 militcap, eto. IS. IAMNCIOtee a I. /ptlr losses "Oa1M "M fattllN r Wllc ri•t "I* "? r W "'Nater tl rat GKt IreA WII M casGOAawll Y/GGIMI y W Iteetpw rtlt Kc"W y W City a1 ""04 bG W lwtic"a saletw"a11SSGict. Z1/. All "taut" Will W)1 M peellN een yCyltl. trlalat. Sort 1. The NIP Ie11GIN r W N SjtNA itas Irt Set ammd win bit f/lrafal All SIN Provided fw a a dealt oil) Mill M Mtlpel 11 castafksce on W sip 0"1A * W Wl" "Ml" "wits Afp)Icatiw W yN�K� U W /lal.1 Oi Wea, INGIGba/M/aq at "$• �1re Kiw 4 /IIMI" Olrlet fN WtrnMIM eW &Want r1W to sc at I1a1111" f "Ou. J. OIrKWP Icerat oplil tall M per16/ fw MKs PM, K Iq rtmet. cwblcl0 eV tewMrN IS syilas�a/wW /I ee/s11w S Isa ics falMAj t• Olrtojro I A"fr e<!H t. Irrt—, sKclafa l Access WTI M "law to aaerdwe win 100"111 rin ?"full" 011tict SGMArb. Z= si1"Ir el Is feet w14 at all tuall �Nly cwSSttnctlr IeAbar.1m, win rasnlll flee MOM raytr U. ZJ. Iriw G IGSaACt of 11011,11189 Malt IW Calwtt1c11 castawctlw, "Id'aact "All M ttlwlttsl G W ma"l"l fin Otltrict Net traprarl meter SWly Iw Stn MtKlla IS e1411M11, peal" 10rtetlw of npilrel It" /ralK/lw yttm. -4- ea PROJECT MO, '/J3 Z4. The applic"t WaeptG 'M WII ca AJI W I.S. last" Sartln b atfrelee W slealalwat "ll t,'1 4 eels Man. "" fwlll rnl0atlal ea"ut llptly,p0'Ir u1G arnnc ttli tre /w was Was IN rat ,sICI1(c/a1IN N "h Ila 1AArle Cecfap 1Nnelariat Arta Pftjftt pwJice�t IN"linafn rtrlieaGSeoyc Aalenlalee.l Mats r "la ne A acr. s/=1 of W anlewnt 0", y �f. Wtr a teWr hies Nall M IatipN ra caata " Ta wit a'I" arnt of W CE f Least/ W4r Olttrict ("', lwnfll Sln 011trict W tee Sacs ul Ntc"n OwcaGat at be CaaaV a/ Ses Ms--mi tt ; (.qatrly w1l Alalal WII w "k Le "ly fM carries SolluA w em11NN "ttas far W IohNN vow w W w11stM WI w 1. 1.1st10, soup e1lan61 (allilln Nall M rsn6s, filled ant cape( " cwol, .la W titfore prl0, Cede. W asifore w11e10, case. Za. Iadmpraad " -lla .tiletln an to M IaaW an sae r w1141M plant italttN far wllelat Pirelli Npllutla. 7 I,raalap of W IrJnt rovany Wll M to accoobsat tit, Ye IYlfare Yfiet0, Code. c ty [radial stoofinel an led radial pKticn. The flal rNap 080 "all M to so"tatal antenna .$to us "Frond essential prNiN pi". Zia. A into cowl "all a "Wed by • 41oI1fI84 William It"n, by W Suit of Cdlltano " prf" add "Pit, 7. I", denlWasot is )wnso .lain W "11 mesl6A catnl sarN"Ieel a sell Iftlaaa.-t ft "Wk to rerlred. II"" costxt loo "road'" Coa17 Copt, of taitwe at (711) M7 -rill (w pral pr MR . insiders, t1�W 7s,of forest Sul) a m�"t1N Pia W entM rWN pwMt. a. A - al0,lal repast Gall M respond by • Wa Iltled O"four ar natOffit atl S"tW at W tlr of Mpllut:a far rail'" pia _ZS. Me flaal radial 0"S Wl) M capletn W airmen roar u lstwoocA N sallmop pwetu. A. As a sestsle: sad'nala. W /611"10, npllressoll Wll be "a a. sent, WII M post" W " trea.at ona-d" p.ara ni" n ' casplstla of all W.ttu YaWvs facilities onnary far V/ L etarl" all las Neeelt, u W utltfwtir of W belief" w IuriA K prior o recordett- of w eW W rim a W vrNUp p..eu. s. ApprWista "sa"ots, far saapfe e'spul of walap voter Wt an contacted Wt@ r Geer A,cest parcels, an to" kllsvoted W recorded to W tads /atieo of W wlTlll" W safety 011111" rim to Isr" a of a7 rntoA add wfiAlap pinto, c. la -sits w""p /wre ts. "itstar, far ssolarlat w pntectlop W saelrlded propru". an o" 1 "ta11N prim to Iss "act of billet" pelts far castnctla spa W parsol Wt my be reject o, w c"utwes Is dees "p liar aterl". l"afN or Mato a pntl null" to nick a wilily pnft Is "pasted. 5- os PROJECT NU. L_X L pal "1 radial Ilan far nd parcel an a M saellted to ae ss11M.A w rsafety 11.1lir far affront prim " laws" N C Neely asi 6.1 N p�la. Ina a7 e r a lac.aual m a. All alp Wt a awns of fin ISI feet a . 'C" m'yn W c esl l ruts sip WII w Ieeas wts ntln �raslls met cplotlr o/ pNl0, w sea cam alt"Wil" awe/ of 1.61" caolnl Wll M t�IelN Le W "tlsfwll6. of W ""l0, official rolart W (IV Itarr, Inlptla Wll M pm10N a al l "" tM pad W "little rout, Ir a pried N { arYa pr""tta. CKIVIERIM 111111c, [. wAS "tla W lalntm access 1. MlutlWS WII w "de by fl"1 "p of m Inmiar t".t r101'. t "my itpp ate all nsp "soeots n swe m s " Ye att. "p, N Ca�.IV IdW1WM Trail rl Pts -of.ml W lwal raiser 1p" rl" )nil mandate. ZL "slant- still be au of W 1611.10, cl/�d -eF.ml r Ye folle.ly streets Immorm frustrate sonars se . taut fast" Leal fast a Leal feet r aal last ei 1 Irmmasle otter of Mlatlr for fast doe Halm, *.,oast WII M ask far all frl"le almleTp —WIM. _(• �� , It" rNln will a espial W Cie, Sts"sras A" access bell w kalalld a W city far as 1611.10, str-Let 6. reciprocal acns "swots a" "Ialnsoce areewaa nsml0, we" Le all parcels W Jal.t "Weence of all cotter reran mins or prttN ame shall w ""low y "a-, or 17 dreel "A "all " rKrlN caarr"t .'a W up or row su " Incs of wildly pea. Wan "up Is "Hind. _7, Prince 4m"p "Iaats Im cros4ot oral "p still w restored W WII be klloaated or milted W W Elul ap. Za. All Ylstl-6 feurutt 111-6 slate (Ctore rlPAt -sf.ey are U be ""'beast or to h MIIw IN a W POP W City toopunr•s _ S. Inwsls far suswlas fsr tillC em WII h Ydfuted h Ms City Men shoals, e"saw tlns� pleeh srysny. L. Street Irre,sMst, t. Crltr t t.11 street Igroeruls'"ledleg, bat M. lleltq ts, <er► led feat". A.C. "sales. aanit, a1'tee a/IraWS. Ponwl trees W street liots r all IYwlw wife st'"U. S. A slstrr of lA-( "t NY "neat wigle A e0.fat adf wlUted light- -f-ed/ LuII h sastmud Fr all balf.Wtln ttmu. Z1 Controct of fall "IM I+rmreeu lacl"tm lit Set lultee an SIR(Ll AAII[ 411141 K aueU A.C. • WlA it". t1wTS OIOUt 1= nil. [IS: W lacledee labuPl "d �Ini"tlr a setwlls (c) L.A. S lit" a (&, ai MIM I Ils.tles itcl 0111 h Pm/M fw the Iua u rriq. nrferal w �. Irlw U era Itteg "Mores to W Paslic rlfhtrf.wy. Im pall be Pale sod " asc'"Chimet "fell Wll h oaulaod (m W f iy t"famr'o Otto". to Witloe U Ay ester "nits "I fed. ✓S. Stmt IMF re.aut Plat owl"IM "novas Wes W street LIT Ss Pnbar" y a Register" Cliff Invader W oPpsred y oa Cly te0lrfr full be rfplred (w all PMllc ctmis prior to usrLa A is tacreaclrest bereft. Flail Plat W profiles SUIT sM Ili lacatva of All "It"" utility facllfwA wigla tau rfbdt .rey. A A sfpnU "few/ aod/w rata IaW ad Irrf "tlm PI" W City Steadier*, SUIT be provided sAjKt To u("wul of W City t -6Iwr for PRITJFCT NIP. $rill LYII be Hated yt AS IfrLwl .Mira to W Yteit at raM6lic !Zw ��rI U street fears wr°huN nyYllae N first. tflYI Itq w of ItsenU of hell 1-6 Nnl�. M,QL4n~rpxwn - L Strait antis "all bbd Nvjr" qr Clt� lu'"re far of MILLto Streets er fr Lee w w yK..a H w City WfYLr. 1. an Sul I, cr t etas p(�d a a. plat. st atts w Ylen, of fill Inteor•s Ofllcf,epleir W,lr I it full h rU lw Ira �n. 4411 stmt l new "felts eeplrn. City Ent t�Oe�to WII h InUllq U th utlst¢tla of W Patient strtpl". Mnleg, frame W stmt. "PI-I shall h 'null" Pw Lu replrrru of Lu City Traffic /plmr. ✓E. Ealstl-6 city mh Npetri ncrtlrettlr WII rwu Powree Traffic at all sloes e1q +71twTo dou" bl amereni.s, f A stmt afYee "nit my h eeptn/. A uu fep It Melt AS /spinet to CMr W felt of pYlqeb W psfy, Mlq WII h ely Pew" As srrPlftla of Lu Cast ectl" to W utlslKtla n Us 17. Wine" MI% be pmlM Aotwr p►ifc SlYwlu .s. a -1141 -IC. bnnvaW aalYp new, Wn Yt troll uMSnL. p4n Idestls tan Lull be Usulted U city Sut4gA. If. falll bereft will be eep(cq Ira Calif. for aq lent eIYU W -6 pt-ef -wit It Of-fiea Mod now Crt 1 L•. The oglfmt will h =,to,@ far Lrsaectlr of all ..Site *of"" facilities replrM y W Miulq Official A IUr ntim drafts will be reCefNe at the folloa-6 IKn ses: �L IM twat Iw Portion tMmfl Is locales sluls u flow MMq lw therefore, need "etsetlr moil full h pmiow as 'miff" by a Water" CI.11 Ealluff W "Proved y Ys City Eegiwr. tea. A tau" Was) W/r now Pr.UC41ee wll will h replrq to Protect th strettem by 41mtl-6 Meet novel, to Stmt'. K U e $safe Oa U. V �• 4epprraU protitlat shall M -oft ter t<tge}two W tlVecat et so,fa <e 441us0 nitrly on Pnprtp Ire aVawt Nr4. i. The falloolap stnellsl shall M onjou, 4 eye w4r nrry 1pa( stnrtti n«Irly a toe►14t1a N "III Cwn halplls, rrnlal M�prIw�<yersa nibs street sew_- -Mrs /1094 an < N "=, Nor Iae1t(apes trU tt7 W .w11N b1rMF{ at�pnparan 2!5• i final tratnaM stq. WII M santw U W tytnao, polo, to gponal of me Final 1�Y1�e r ottomans or Alldi s Mutts, WChanr ecren flnt. All 48T." (rllltln WII M IalUllN at "Ind by 00 city Cglnar. ~ wIUUIIts Ito�I�V Fined [Ntnl ils4 /tt It ropint (r wort stilly unitn U NN paml IKINIy wl4rf uwyl yttaN veto,, pet. NKMC pnao,. 4101"". W tale TV 411 Cube ""Ned' U ecto,4nae Cult" W "Ill V SUMer4. 4tnn4 � WII M pries"" as nplrN. _• M 4nloorr WII M mpaNNe for W nlocatl4 N aptly will [tin It Necessary. I. 4rsa1 Cyw1 r400s ace tepee is .� I. A panes ty Wll na nto,tN polo, 4 font pwsa IWId{la U poeenl twtlm of wtretytlM paMll. S. M Ia111Ay palliator Imem,,at p,,.W an n ?I W to M rW $no W lawuape arfot04NCe etitrl<4 J. prior U ma"' tim, a Wtlto of bwtlna U fan aw" joie Uatsagt W tlgNllg OlstrRtt Shall No /1194 NU the Cott Carol Iha ey Nee y Cott IamlrN U Platoon r H ttN Cull be oerat by W denlepor. 1. a, ei pwtlr 4 JOIN UI MAIN IOW L&MKW Nblrsaect mitrbt Cull N 11114 with W Oft Crll air to ae►reeat N Ile Final IUD r =0 of oollity p0relts, iHShenr non rent. 5. let $@"rate etlttly ppaarcels C44fned wltelo Ue project Ueutrin toll 4 Iyallf t l4 sat" on panel Mir 4 W sttwte of eels alaC penitt. -7- PROJECT N0.9• �i. M he fr a — e ipprnal of W Flu Ib( M wit load net*, to "Cam tint, fin M w[e of 411<h y its, aINMU - =+. Ytln of LWtIN 4 ten Nye lab W IIpIIM t4 ltNUglyy thetrltt WII u /1194 rU W CIV C-11 poor 4 n<oreetlN rf W w r IlNaecr of twlltly (amts. selt4nr ',en /lnt. ■. Nuuuaa 1. pnr14 4paraU AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING WIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEV 88 -03 - SMITH 3�J34 Notices Mailed - See attached Signed: [�•h,�a �� (ir l,n Date: (RETURN TO ENGINEERING DIVISION AFTER SIGNING y ,IMaiI Clerk for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby swear that on �. , iu 7 r aDDroximately � /� u o'clock ��1., I% �, at ..1�� (a.m. or p.m.). I deposited in the Cucamonga Branch of the United States Post Offi a located at 9607 '- Center Drive, a letter addressed to and regarding: Susiress NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 3. 1988 WIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEV 88 -03 - SMITH 3�J34 Notices Mailed - See attached Signed: [�•h,�a �� (ir l,n Date: (RETURN TO ENGINEERING DIVISION AFTER SIGNING y NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL The Rancho Cucamonga City Council will be holding public hearings at 7 ;30 p.m. `C on August 3, 1988 at the Lion's Park Community Building located at 9161 Base " Line Rnad, Rancho Cucamonga, California, to consider the fallowing described project(s): ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANb DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - SMITH - Appeal of the ann ng am ss on ec s On requ r ng n- eu ees for utility undergrounding and (2) off -site street improvements for the development of a 20 unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APR 207 - 251 -22 Anyone having concerns or questions on any of the above items are welcome to contact the City Engineering Division at (714) 989 -1862 or visit the offices located at 9340 Base Line Road, Unit 8. Also, anyone objecting to or in favor of the above, may appear in person at the above - described meeting or may submit their concerns in writing to the Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to said meeting. Jute 22, 1988 Date Published Rancho Cucamonga City Council m 01084112- 22 020'^ - ':° MOTA JESUS AND N. ..44a9 30 CO. 020754142 1 i' +. 1958 EL DORADO AVE. ONTARIO. CA RAYGOZA JOSE H. 235 AZURE CT. HEHPHIS, ROY E & KATFfY z; 91764 UPLAND, A 91786 8356 RAIN ..T, 01084112? CUCAMONCA, A 91730 a 24 020724401 6 29 32 0207541441; i 1853 EL DO PETER 1857 EL DORADO ONTARIO. A 91764 MARTINEZ, NARY E. P.O. 80% 34] SHEONARINE, HARRY C. UPLAND. A 91766 195 N. EUCLID AVE. A UPLAND, 91786 ` 010841135 Y5 i PIA CATHERINE 1404 EIGHTH ST. 020754146 ' ?� ONTA -RIO, A 91764 KRAUSS, GENE A. 8351 CHAFFEE ST. •• 010841120 33 020725132 CUCAMDNGA, CA 91730 MARSHALL. SAMUEL L. ATCHISON TOPEKA AND 35 020754102 •• �.; EL DORADO AVE. ONTARIO, RIO. A 91764 SANTA FE RR 1170 H. THIRD ST. PANG- DOUGLAS S K T S 8804 SAN 8ERlL►RDINO, A 92410 ED AN ST. A 81730 010841122 23 020754101 7 DAN9 PRONG 020754104 '? 1859 EL DORADO AVE. ONTARIO. A 91764 SMITH, STEVEN C. 8748 EDHIH LACASELLA, MARIE C. F RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A 91730 8824 EDNIN CUCAMONGA. A 91730 010841.33 27 020754103 PIA, CATHERINE 9 020754106 1 ' 1404 EIGHTH STREET ONTARIO. A 91764 AYLOR. RUTH A TR. 3976 AYLOR DR. BURTON, ALLEN C. GULF DREEZE, PL 32561 ST. ' 010841136 26 020754105 91730 PIA , PHIL J. 11 020754108 1 ONTARIO, A R AVE. SECRETARY /HOUSINGGURBAN D. 34 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA RYLZ. JACK R. 9176 SANTA ANA, CA 92712 8339 MAIN ST. CUCAMONGA, 027724301 31 020754101 CA 91730 MALACARA. STEPHEN G. 13 020754110 1 8795 VINMAR AVE. CUCAMONGA, A 91730 HEBERLING. DALE V. 8329 MAIN ST. ALVARADO AN V. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA91730 8357 MAIN ST. CUCA'4ONA. 02 724402 28 020754109 CA 91730 MARTINET., RALPH M. 15 020754143 1 8787 SIERRA MADR.E AVE. CUCAHOHA, CA 91730 BRAZIER. THOMAS L. 8349 MAIN ST. AN.SN VARDHAN, SUlERMAL M. CUCAMONCA. A 91730 3303 AVE. LA VERNE, 4 CA 91750 020754145 VOGEL, DAVID W. "- CUCAMONCA. CA 91730 =s 020725119 HARTINE2, MARY E. Cr_ P.O. BOX 347 Ir UPLAND, CA 91786 020725122 "R A. E. SMITH �F_ 8632 ARCHIBALD, #201 .t CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 020723137 S 020725137 9820 RANCHO VE 8500 WILSI 211 BEVERLY H: 6 020753110 20 02075414 VOC DAVID W. CU C1 CNGA. CA 91730 4 020723 19 MARTINE . MARY E. P.O. 80 343 UPLAND, 91786 1 020725122 A. P, SHT RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE 8500 WILSHIRE BLVD, W -s BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90 F 020753110 LEBOEUF, GERALD J, a 8790 EDWIN ST. CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 ,'' 020723120 MARTINEZ, GEORGE A, 8809 SIERRA MADRE AVE CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 020725123 "'WRIGHT, MARVIN L. ° 9232 MALACHITE ST. 'CUCAMONGA- CA 91730 '020753109 POWERS, DENNIS J, 8780 EDWIN ST. CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Z, 20 020754145 VOGEL, DAVID N. 8341 CHAFFEE CUWONGA, CA 91730 4 020``725119 HARQZ, =MARY E. UP BOX 347 UP D. CA 91786 1 0207 5122 S 02072 VILLAGE �BLVD ..#820 8500H CA 90211 BEVER 6 U207S: ..oavnuY, GE J, CUCAMONCAN CT.9 730 3 020725120 2 020725173 WRIGHT, MARVIN L. 9232 MALACHITE ST. CUCAMONGA- CA 91730 34 020753109 POWERS, DENNIS J. 8780 EDWIN ST. CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 1 ,��0.3 3 tM 7 [BALI), 6201 CA 91730 tDR VILLAGE [IRE BLVD„ #820 ZLS, CA 90211 LD J. 91730 �ALJLMZZ, GEORGE A. 8809 SI MADRE AVE. CUCAHONCA, CA 91730 2 020725123 R IN L. 9232 kLAMCH E ST. CUCAMONGA, 91730 34 020753109 _ POWERS, DENNIS J. 8780 EDWIN ST.', CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 91 r' ti• PUBLIC HCARING NOTICES CITY COUNCIL - 8 -3-88 ENV ASSESS & DR 88 -03 SMITH 34 NOTICES HAILED 7 -22 -86 ,C4J r f x r a t i } a i 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCADiONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: AN AMEIAVENT TO THE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP SECTION OF THE CITY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE THE REGULATION OF NON- RESIDENTIAL SUBOIVIS(ONS RFLOM EIUATION: Staff recommends that the City Council introduce the attached ordinance (first reading) governing the regulation of non - residential subdivisions. BACKGROUND: The City adopted its vesting tentative map ordinance (No. 280, copy attached) for residential subdivisions on November 20, 1985, to be in effect by January 1, 1986, as required by State law. State law now requires that Developers be allowed to file a vesting tentative map for non - residential subdivisions. Therefore, staff has prepared the attached ordinance which will amend the existing ordinance to govern the processing of non - residential to addition to residential subdivisions. The Planning Comission reviewed the proposed ordinance on June 8, 1988, and recommended its approval. DISCUSSION: Briefly, a vesting tentative map gives a subdivider the right to develop a subdivision in accordance with the City regulations in effect at thd- time that the vesting tentative map was approved and no new or changed requirements can be lip osed by the City during the approval period. In addition, that same right extends for one year after recordation of tie final map. As stated, this ordinance modification merely changes those sections of the previous ordinance that referred to residential subdivisions only to include non - residential subdivisions. a�?-s CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AUGUST 3. 1988 PAGE 2 Tha existing ordinance essentially restated the required State law. - Where the City was given options, the most restrictive option was chosen. A ..sting of those options referenced to by ordinance section - number is as follows: 16.49.060 (b) All discretionary items shall be filed with the vesting tentative map versus at a later date as allowed R by the State law. 16.49.080 The vesting tentative map initial approval shall expire in two years, versus the three -year option allowed by State Law. 16.49.090 (d) (1) The vested rights shall remain for a period of 12 months after the final map is approved versus 24 months allowed by State law. In addition to the ordinance, attached for your reference 1; a list of comnon questions and related answers relating to vesting tentative naps that was developed by the League of California Cities. t Attachments: Proposed Ordinance Existing Ordinance League of California Cities' questions and Answers _ a-a6 i I A O d at0INANCt to. Tao Al O"BRNCt Or In CITr ConCIL or rim cm Or amcto COW M®cA, CALIFORNIA. AOOttc CRAFTQ 16.49 TO In apa0A gt00 On INNCI. TITLL 16 Ot Slt WCW COCANp11OA Mn ICIPAL COtt. 712TAn&2 TO rgTlbo IEI'SSTpt 494!$ rociorft M CITT COncti at I6 City Or WCID Cat' MA POp ORDAM AS dL^IIOE1t iltls 16 et the 4 "ho Casemate mulclp l Code in har.hy Anedod to add a ow Cha►car 4f, is ho road- 1s voNe sad figure,, AS fallout %b&bfmLlb.ts °3AGt10ilt 16.4[.010 Cltatloe sad Authority. 16.47.0:0 farpoos wed intent. 16.49.070 Application of Chapter. 13.49.040 Detlaitiosa. 16.49.050 CeaUteacy with City rgatatlou. 14 49-0&0 filled 4ed PuCaaaiq. 16.49.070 you. 16.49.010 ftP/r"tam. 16.49.090 $!$bts [ranted as aProval at cap, 16 .49.100 I "oatntenq wltb teoiss • CeNltloul approval, 16.49.110 Application Lee col with torrent policies. •tt _elO. rt f . This chapter A reacted pereu4oe to the 4etholty traocN by Chapter 4.0 (eta "iq with $"ties 46496.11 at the Calltorsla Ges"asyu CC44 (beratea is reforrld to a the Cretin[ Testative Nap statute). 449 nay be cited as 494 'vas[!q tentative up ordlu "4.' •1a_49.ete. tr.... It is eha establish pef th o! Tooting uutn to Prec04oes as otbat7 for the lglwatetln of the tutlt Tootative NAP (unto. kept a ethynt10 ore lath la tby ""laic" of thin chapter, the Provisions of this se►dlvietoe atelunae eY411 apply to the vesting tentative cap erdlawe. •(a) This chatty a hall apply •oily to anidrettd ewi7oiaaet[. $Yeyerer • Provision of the $ebdlvtaioa Nap Act, as i +larseN aN uprlaasesM y the oredlelrioa ordlauce. Cellists Cho tlllng at a tutative up o tlatatbs P•rcot asp to a residential decal eprst. a vesting test"ivo �► my lAateed b• !1104 to "review* alto the Provisions beryls. •(Y) if . aDeideo dens set uAk the rights tosfured y thin apply. the etDawlse applicable Provisions et e a embdivisice ardia "s shall apply. •16. U1A—J rlAju" & . residue! 1 )n404elUaaed. as defined is Lbe asbehlsst t etdluw6av4" whichrit thereof Cn processed is record"" with the Provlalrel of this chapter. •(b) 6npe a q "1 /fealty tat teeth is this eYqur ail ldlo[tteot !a tee asYeivlsios ordlaws mill be a #at teeth hereto. ExtsT/NG OR DIN 'fNCE - aa� Ordinance b. SW Casa 1 •IF.N.ele. raa.Lee" .tee .,.� .., ......., and @hall be subdivided 4ed developed personae to a vartlas tentative t for s,4 purpose which is locooelatwa nick the taaral plan Of GLy applics, a specific Plan or community plan and which is not permitted by the dNtlopuat code or other applicable Ptovisioss of this code. .M.40.9Fe. riling ae1 grmLaasift. A vesting tentative up @ball be tiled to tke saw fare del bevm the came contests. accoapanflae data and Saporta and @bell be procouod in the soon darer a set forth in the Subdivision ordinance for a secretive u► aoapt as hereinafter Provided, "(el At the ties a wasting tentative wp is tiled it @ball huge Printed cugicaual7 as its two the wards 'westing tentative u►.' RU &lwlraaemee with, or pals, u, !be ties a vesting tentative up to tiled, a Subdivider skull supply newfound applicatinu for all discretionary one entitlements necessary for the prejnct, inalut&$, bee sot limited to. use permits, 4evelepwat /demigs cwLvs, ewndesOts to the general Plat or del "Plleable IPealfia plas or comity plus, dew choose#, awndwate to the developwst cede$ eta., together with all coatings iatormatica awasury to pieces@, as applicable, a negative declaration or draft enircounul Impact comt perduat to the tear of the California fnlroutntal Qulity Act. "(c) A Subdivider say asbade a coolant applitatios few a build!&$ Pecsit at the ties of filing as Provided is this dentinal ►owner, suer to circoutaaes Abell such Permit, if Leaned. &rest voting aig]en a specified in this chapter. "LLALem. Iona. Upon tiling a vesting tentative up, the Subdivider shell pay the tune resulted by that resolution of the city council for the tilt&$ the processing of a tentative up. "IA.Ae.eme_ aebaNw. The approval er aditiout approval of a Toni&$ tentative up shall give tre (1) Tag" :rat the date of Lt$ edoptlon by reenlutias. gntaales@ of a wasting tentative up S hall be subject to theme Procedure& to the subdivision ordinance applicable to tke atsnlos of tentative ups. "ILa.eee. a,g ►,a gwaeaa w er..w I d w "(a) She approval or coaditloul approval of a vesting nnation up @bell coaster a Totted right to protean a final eq W prxead with development is substantial eeeglLmme with the ordinances. Policies, cad stardado described In Ccvernwat Coda satin 66473.1. "gather. it 6acties 664744 of the Covmraa@nt Code to eptaled. tie approval at cnnditiout approval of a voting tentative up &ball Goof., a Tested right to prat@0 a final wP d Proceed with dovelowat is substantial congllance aitb the 1404 wee 414Lesdnas. Policies. Ied standards is affect a the rime the vesting tentative up to approved ate conditionally approved. NO WotwLthstarALng subdivisios (el. a -Irait. approval. atemalos, or 4stlel.s4at my be ands cosditieut up desied if app of the 'allowing are deterdaed, "(1) A failure to do a would Plane the residents of a subdivision at the Immediate community, or both, is a Condition d4egernc4 to their basics or enfety, or both. `(1) The eeeditien eon denial is rgairmc, is safer to ca&ply with state or todor l tw. ma 014042c. r,. 190 rata 3 "(a) Ths rights reterrd to to this Oecalo, %.It acteaO ealT Lt, a.4 at the tlY, a final On to teprw.d for chat Pr.j"t. loch rights ratnTst to Owego . boll mpire it O final r► l0 wet apPewed PrI.r to the expdrattoa of cbe v sting tentative r/ ol Prwiaed to loltloa 16.499.010. "(a) it the final map is approved. these rights shpt rani• .*"tad ` fw the [ollsiq Periods of times ND can initial time period of MOLT. (11) ..the tAeae ewerOl 1143 YP OsO tseoNN en vriwa Oblate of • Project ewarad by a algle k""at teat"I" map, this Initial time period Ohgl hgls for each p ►u@ w %4 the first 991 in that Photo 14 rseorded. automatically 'M The Initial time Period lot forth la (4) (1) t*atl be by day time need f" KYtesiq • somplOto n►lLcatica fn a $radial P.raLt n fw design or an%1tYMr41 rwiw. If each prseeastng Yreds 30 days, from the data • complete application is filed. "(3) • subdivider may */pit to the Clay Conan! fora Co"4Or attention at cry time befne the Idt101 site PeTid ut forth !a (O fl) Capitol. 0(4) U the eubdlwlder submits c complete ap►lit*tlos for "Lldleg paroit during the period$ of elm OPmeltL" Dubs atio4 (d) Yard' th• rig►te taloned to 4tW etat eonit utll the api4tioo et teat Nrslt. n Oay ate4les at that permit. "1d.699.t00_ T. .t t e z -t "(a) %lea.eer a sebdLTldn Isla a v4stlul t4tsclvs met ter a @ubdivlsl.s what* Latecded dwaleNOst is l4atedat "t with the dwalapmeat code Is aletenae at that time, that lttoaalataaq shall he anted as the Mo. The City "Cat dap rash a voting tentative met n apPrwe Lt codlticed as ebe subdivider. or bit at In !!sits". eetednlng the necessary change Sa the dwOlo►Ynt cdd to 11121221* the In.sa/tteory. if the change is the dws"Mat coda U 46"'att- the •PPTwed " aaditto4117 apnoeed Tasting testa:LTe map @hall sowit)e0. tlag duties 16.41.090(4, coafer tbt east 04 rig ►t is presets a final a • od Magi with the dwelopmeat is aubstacial eompllnY• with the ehage with,)* ebasse is the imeloprat code Old the map. as apKwad. "(h1 The risbts aoafnrot by this @"tied shall he for the time Periods oat forth is ledtlon 16.49.090(U. "3 .bat 10. _ 4netJU`t 1 f / ► derv! "d4myq aay /rwlafer of Olt ehgea[• • KPN[ry wan et hla or ter designed .� lick s. amO14 er rods de for ed is viiah dapart crow the ot*lg.•004a pollclte, esd ttadatd@ eaarl ►d (a !Kate" 16.49.090(4 and to the a god local gemei4 may trot t►@so ayKWale " 144 that patoits to the state t ►at the dap•rmr4 Oat atthnlaod eadev applicable tea. 19CIU a Tie Provisions of Chapter 49 of Title It 0%011 beta" operative at of lgaury 1. 1936. =32fet i The Clay Commit uslarad flat, 4b"td •p #Twist". saetlo•, Per draPe, T"ttxa of wt* of this ndla * ►n rederad or declared lwlILd by gay final evert gatlee to a comet of towat "t InLedtatied. me by read.. of aw pre"tl.e lnglalaeioa. et* vat""' prwlstsa4 @ettteoe. par "rap►d' •rtemete. 46, .aria of this sNl "eta "alt remain Sa toll force ad offset. ate? i 3 age 41 "ro. 510 fxrrar a. tDa Mayor aktll ttfo this adlatua e" the City Cleik than stare tee u*a se La "". vitbla fitt4eo ill) days after its ease e at teat out la >y ed_ t_�t -•.. s aresN9ot of 114""1 sirt.4tioi 9Ml/ehed is the City of Datarle, Cal/fosata. aN air "14144 is tae Clay of 11e*sbu N "rat.: G1llo"le. TASSEL. JIMMIED, a" ADOryco this 10th day of raoasher. 1785. AT[!, Willis. 11gtot, Mass. Dahl. 11!7 tope, foe* Wells rose set ATrLTt '� [*.arty Asth4let. city peak Ir IIWMY A. AUMIT. CITt CLR of the City of laube Cocsmege. Cdlforal4, do haaby "rtlfy that the tarp*(" adLtauo vas istr*duesd at a regular marine of the Csemit of the city of loathe Caeamegs hold os the 6th the Cfsuil ol�f Cityr*1#loerho Cecaao "a holldoan %bar loth daysOftNovember. 1983. boosted this list day of reosab*r. 1fU at 11auko Cacam "a. Ca11f *L6i4. be eAh�leq C k T"o iJP^ ^,' ^•j •};^.ape! li 8 CC..":t AT ZST" s Lpe 8 b Cld pnn;Po eraJi.�a, Ccaw. U f_ r f' °;q r ;pia League Of California Cities ;IOGi6 Ol7 ® 7cnm M 14OKSr Sam s:a+. te+q.usm i � 11 1 1 i ■ C161t� ,y tf , a .18.4•oeialMn oP(nff ro1•d1ia ' IMPLEMENTATION INFORMATION ON SB THE 1660 (Montoya) "VESTP` RIGHTS" BILL, Chap. 1113, 1f6: Statutes FeSruary !967 Senate BIII 1660 thtenhva).Chapttr 1117 of, the bi0 7� subdivision 9 , ane p, call et active taro Statutes, was enacted D " wbdlv9tan map, ealtct a ' 1+ 1966. The bill creates a Y the Legislature develnpar that he or "vesting tentativs map," whit ppr form of tentative approval. she will be ebb to Preeead wly development In accord+ tuarantees a This paper addresses dance with that I references are to me tlsc most common questions of local officials Sections 66424.7, "423, $643 (a Govvr^ment Code unless otherwise noted. SS 1660. All through 66496.6. ' 66432' 65432,6 and 66467.1, and adds Seetiont 1TWTV—mends and 66096.1 I• UESTIONt TO WHAT KINDS OF DEVELOPMENTS DOES MPPLY? ANSTER, Resldentla! develop,,,, ar! 6609..7). �_ THE "VESTING TENTATIVE Y (Government Code �, T� 2. UESTIOo comply THAT is la MUST WE COMPLY WITH THIS NEW LAW? ANSWERt You must comply wly t_ law h bIW. 1, IY36, but you may do so sooner 6609E.3 and uncoditied Sec, 10 01 the DUD. —mac. 7. OUESTiONt WHAT IS A "VESTING TENTATIVE MAP," AND DOES ONE OF THESE MAF1T&jR1ANV DIFFERENT FROM AN ORDINARY TENTATIVE HAP? ANSWER: A "ItsLna tentative map" la basically ttN same as an or thecity o the state law requires Is that When cne o, these •vesting" maps Is tiled with the city a tees, dlnuf tentative map. —onjy "vestint tentative lisp+ (Sesp K42t 1 and nspi ,sly printed on It% face the words 4. UESTIONt HOW DOES THIS BILL AFFECT CITIES' AND COUNT ES' POWERS TO Or denla �U[DlVIS1ONS? ANSWER! Not at all, up to the time the m y or dented W7at KK 0111 Umhs s''* agility to r}ynSo coMittons after sAat point. 4 ap approved M OUEST(ONt DO THE CHANGES MADE BY SB 1660 AFFECT ORDINARY (] M S i ASR'ER! No. It is an alternative S7 proc— educe, TENTATIVE 6. UESTIONe IS THERE ANY DIFFERENCE IN THE PROCESSING OF AN RY TENTATIVE MAPS? ANSWER, That design Government Cede Section 66411, whin depends Your local ordinances. THESE and improvement °! subdivisions in of I d0" mt ametd, vests control of the as amended by the bill, provides yet "v tou^cils end boards of supervisors same as tentative maps as haiOtherwise sting tentative w Sec- 66432, Provided D taps are to be processed the 7• UESTIONt Y state law or local ordinance. 9 DEV PRIOR TO APPROVING A -VESTING" THAN W O SUPPLY THC CITY WITH MORE DETAILS ON AN WE REQUIRE A E DO ON AN ORDINARY MAP? ANSWER: A DEVELOPMENT requires er p°rmits Yes+ It your local ordinance so II �� 7. OUESTIONt `'HAT DETAILS MIGHT 1 CONSIDER REQUIRING THE DEVELOPER TO confeSUABLY 1 gll TO APPROY, L OP A "VESTING" MAP? ANSWER, Became the rights rred by t b process last for a Ien7�Y period of Ume, ano because sWsequmt "MI MS of Cheat be ssin consistent with the map as approved, you may wish to than tlmul Drith a' so that most or all discretion simultaneously with m a discretionary approvals occur beforemof develo ap Provll• Consequently, You may wbh to consider requiring the ;. per to supply with tht map information that your dry or county needs to determine the Impact of the project on your City or county over a period of years, such ast - height, size, and location of buildings sewer, water, stcrm drain and road details - Information on the uses to which the bulldhlgs will be put - detailed gradlr plans geological a- floodControlInformation •� - architectural plan, any other studies your city has normally deferred to the building permit stage. + 9. QUESTION: R'IfEN SHOULD DESIGN REVIEW OCCUR FOR A "VESTING" MAP PRNSWERt You ma wish to with or prior toto ieview of the map. Your city �d�pr�lgn ravlew alr,sultaneously In which this and other dlscretlonary approvaSs occwry should probably review the order are ` approved, the Crall approvals t Processed with, or for tom goo tjytrvek�thuf m pnj� Project are known, , the ma 10. QUESTION: WHAT RIGHTS DOES THIS BILL GIVE A DEVELOPER THAT THE once the �isEjt-DOES NOT HAVE UNDER CURRENT LAW? ANSWERt Under the bill, eve pm "t in s b map Is approved, the developer may generaU development Iti substantial compliance with the or y Proceed with effect at rite time the developer tiled a complete dinatices, policies' and standards In with the city health or Safety. at (b) vial :state rror federal law kdevelopment Gom�d (a) endanger public 66497.11 66498.6), Secs. 66474.2, I I - QUESTION: IF THE CITY OR COUNTY APPROVED A vyING" MAP, IN WHAT CIR`�t4 �TICES CAN THE COUNTY OR CITY DENY A FINAL MAP OR A BUILDING PERMIT? ANSWER: Only then it arrest do so to protect public health or safety o: to comply with state or tsderal law (Sect K493.1, 66497.6). 12. ttUEST10Nt CAN A CITY OR COUNTY DENY APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE 'VESWERt Pr Probably SOLELY ON THE GROUND THAT THE MAP IS A "VESTING" MAP? ANStVERt Probably not. P IS 11• UESTION: HOW LONG DOES THE "yESTING" CONTINUE ONCE THE TENTATIVE Pus one to three Dyeusiw �es Ung+ rights last until a final Map is recorded, ordinances, extensions, atilt processlnife of fix building permit. Dept D Y during which morator are g tittle, this means 3.)/= to 10 cant(Ilugs any time schedules: In effect or Iawsuita are Pending), based an the following 26 ��� A) All tentative maps, Including "vesting- maps last from two to six local ordinames and extensions (See, 66s32.6h plus years, depending on b) depending on local ordinances, the developer has either one or two yeah after the final map Ii recorded to appiy for a building permit, and the county of city may extend I that for one more year to a total of three years, (Sec, 116032.6(8))1 and ee eus c) if the developer has filed a complete application for a building permit, the right continues through the life of the building permit (usually six month), Plus any extenrions I Me sty erm on the bulldimg permit, plus processing Ume for architectural review or trading permits, If the time fa ptoc 116032.110aI. nE those permits exceeds 70 days (S.c. I 10, UESTIONt WHAT HAPPENS iF A DEVELOPER LETS ONE OF THESE TIME 5. PER O RE? ANSWERt The developer is then treated the same t. were in ordinary applicant ttrout the rights given by the "vestin map (L It 64 or she r p (Sea 6c09:.!). 13. 2UESTIONt HOW DO THE TIME PERIODS DESCRIBED iN QUESTION 13 APPLY TO PHA3 DEVELOPMENTS? ANSWERt The Units periods that run after a tUW map Is recorded commence an each p sits a �ruN the final ma f� that P phase is recorded (Sec, !! li. QQUESTIONt SECTION 6609:.3 PROVIDES THAT A COUNCIL OR BOARD OF SUPE)iVISOR3' MAY CONDITIONALLY APPROVE A "VESTING" MAP THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH LOCAL ZONING, AND MAKE THE MAP APPROVAL i CURRENT PTRACInCES?EANSWER GArobablyRra at all. OW DOES THIS AFFECT F OUR rezoning tThis Provision was inserted to accommodate those jwisdletloitsMAP on a later 17. UESTIONt OUR CITY rOUNCIL OR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HAS DELEGATED APP MAPS TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION (OR SUBDIVISION REVIEW ORDINANCES M BOARD OF OR COUNCIL ISBILL REQUIRE US TO CCHANT PROCEDURE? ANSWERt No' But since you may be using a different procedure to Process "vnt(n8" maps, you MAY wish to consider whether Use not delegate approval of "vesting• maps council os board wishes to a� 18. UESTIONs HOW DOES THIS LAW RELATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NLAW? A Wits This bill was conceived as an altetnative to development agreements, suetlon to deny) applications Because concts cons act, local develo endaswill , unlike a development agreement, a vesting map is not referandable, 19-49U ESTIONt CAN WE REQUIRE A DEVELOPER TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AG EVEN AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF A "VESTING" MAP? ANSWERt Probably not. 20. (?UEST (ON: WE HAVE HAD TO CHANGE OUR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO CO PLY WI H CHANGES IN STATE OR FEDERAL LAW. 1111' WE HAVE TO DO THIS able to require redesign, or you may need to stop the project (Secs 6649E.1(e), and 6609E.6(b)), _ 27 �-,33 a1 21. UESTONt THIS IS A STATE-MANDATED COST. HOW DO ME PAY FOR IT? ANS s New See. 66498.t, and u,KOdilied 3se. 11 0! the Dill fpeeltlealiy authorise acv er one coundea n Msrp developers who life ^vptint" maps an amount sufficient to and to work cost Of either ancej $0 � may wish to determine Uuu costs, first several bender who apply for "vesting- r local builder asaoclatlan x with the Ps. 23. QUESTIONs TXTITMOI OR SHE FILES A CERTAIN TIME DEVELOPER'S Rl( _ HOW DO WE DET: �I i -A •.....,vn u I-onPLr.TE. HOW It dos noti but you may need to fer a `votng map.• '19f, x R A BUILDING PERMIT VITM N A MAP IS APPROVED, AND `THE kT PERMIT It aFVJr "COMPLETE -? ANSWERt State law does not unaUON FOR A BUILDING PERMIT j5 count, what Is requiredT g- MIding permit to be complete. You terry wish 10 review t Ust th City's or county's current building permit application requ ma and prepare a Hat of requirementt, to be wd for reference by teeth your staff and by applicanta. 24. UESTONt SECTIONS 66491.2 and 66498.0 AUTHORIZE A DEVELOPER TO APPLY FOR N NOMENT TO A "VESTING" MAP BEFORE THE "VESTING. RIGHTS EXPIRE, AND AUTHORIZE A LOCAL AGENCY TO GRANT OR DENY THOSE CHANCES. WHAT CONDITIONS MAY WE ATTACH TO SUCH AN APPLICATION? ANSWERt You may wish to ov►a loWMatandard$ and praedires for precoatng such appleeattons, perhaps distinguishing shin PA$tantlal and specifying whether such changes lengthen or do net ! Insubstantial Chsatges, and lengthen the vesting period. 27. UE.STI�ON: THE FEES CIE CHARGE DEVELOPERS CHANGE Fp BOttt IN N URE AND AMOUNT. CAN WE APPROVE THE MA WILL ALLOW US TO CHANGE THE FEES IN EFFECT AT THE PERMIT IS ISSUED, RATHER THAN SHEN THE MAP IS APPROVE Contain a With regard to the oon that the amount tof the fee is to be det� m� al stage. ns building far public health or safety reaso or to comply with state or 6S498.1(c) and 66491.6). 28 M TIME TO TIME, IN A WAY THAT ME A BUILewe the except (Secs. Y. ORDINANCE NO. a 0Lr - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TdE CITY - OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING SECTIONS 16,49.010(x) AND 16.49.040(x) OF THE RANCHO - CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROCESSING OF vESTING TENTATIVE MAPS. ." THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FoLL40WSi r. Cucamonga Municipal Codacisohetaby'amandad to rand�ln words and figures, as follows; z= Map Act, as(implleemented andrsupplasantad the by the subdivision ordinance, requires the filing of a tentative map or tentative parcel map, a vesting tentative map may instead be filed in accordance with the provisions herein." Section 2s Section 16.49.040(x) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal figures, as follows: m Coda Se hereby aended to read, in words and "(a) A 'vesting tentative map* shall mean a sental or non-residential subdivision, map' s defined ie theisubdivision ordinance, and which is thereafter processed in accordance with tho Provisions of this chapter." A&Gli B 2; The City Clark shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cans • the same to be Published within fifteen (15) days after its adoption at least once in The Daily glport, a newspaper of general circulation Published in the City of Ontario, and circulated in the Citp--of, Rancho Cucamonga. � 1988. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of _ Kayar PROPOSE'Q 0R011V111VCE, 1 a3_5 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT August 3, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide I ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 31 FOR TRACT NO. 13318, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND MWANITA DRIVE, TO STREET LIGHTING MAIHTENANNCE DISTRICT NO. 2 RECOIIENOATION: It is recomended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 31 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No 31 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for Tract No. 13318, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita Drive. The developer of the subject tract has been notified of the public hearing by sail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 89440. Res ubmltted, r -- RA4. Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 9S - L( q 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FIRAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13318 6tn day t* Juully. 1988,CadoptoitsiResolutioniof Intention Ro. 88 -a1 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 31 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -441 was duly and legally published in the tine, fors and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Inprovemento, was duly and legally posted in the time, fora, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Cleric; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the, adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real pro perty proposed to be assessed for the Improvements described to said Resoluttor, of Intention No. 88 -441, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucm—m-ga'-fhat the public interest aQ convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -441, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved, a— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's eport are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts fiave been occupied. CITY Of RANChO CUCAMONGA ' Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Amexation No. 31 for Tract No. 13318 x SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is to compliance with the requirements of Article 4, T Chapter 1, Division IS of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Ughting Act of 1972). A SECTION 2. General DestriDtion This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3, plans and Specifications The plans end specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the condit.ons of approval for the development and as approved by the City - Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement on the individual development is hereby made s part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and sueciflcs were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include. the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. _ a3� W SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment Purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is comprised of street light improvements on local streets for residential ^improvements throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional landeinsindustrial. commercial andhinstitutonalma eastderives theesame benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. Tl.e estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District Po. 2 is shown below: I. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTO No 31 Total 5800L 1,432 7 9500L 4 0 1,434 4 *Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lam slim L_ amps Rate MO'S ,saint. Cost 5800L 1,439 X S 8.93 X 12 :154,2%13.24 9500L 4 X $10.16 X 12 487.68 Total Annual Maint. Cost $154,690.92 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation v 5,194 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 16 Total Assessment Units 51210 s 3. Cost Per Assessment Unit: total Annual Maintenance Cost 5170.92 529.69 /year /unit o.o n s .n arc Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. 4' d SECTION S. _Assessment Diagram S Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 20, Annexation No. 31. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the , text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment z• ' all unnivwwiithin the Districtrand thatfassessment shallnbeaequale to its for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will to 2 units per net acre. T SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. U 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and r sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4 CouEvery in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hedring and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assesrments. �Yv " C: 1 ti EXHIBIT 'Am Properties and improvements to be 31 included within Annexation No. to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Project Assnn_ ess. Acreage N No. of Lam s to be Annexed TR 13318 - -- 16 r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. 31 X,-- . • , r . . • ^ . . t I r y � � •4 r .lrm .r f, • r t. r'!t. a re is u u t. •� � rT r. i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A COUNTY OF 8AN BmARDINO - BTATS OF CALIFORNIA -ate l� 9 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 3, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Aaguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 47 FOR TRACT NO. 13318, PARCEL MAP 10941, CUP 87 -19, CUP 87 -42. DR 87-41 AND DR 87 -52 (VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUCAOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT HO. 1 RECMUNTION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 47 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council appproval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation ilo. 47 to Street Lighting P ai a anCUP District No. 1 for Tract No. 13318, Parcel Map 10941, Clt OR 87-41 and OR 81 -52 (various locations tnroughou,� the City). The developers of the subject projects have been 00tifie-1 of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -442. Respe u suboltted��a •J . Attachments 1 RESOLUTION NO. n- el FE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 47 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 MD ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13318, PARCEL MAP 10941, CUP 87 -19, CUP 87 -42, DR 87-41 AND OR 87 -52 WHEREAS, the C1tv Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of July, 1988, at -,,t its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -443 to order the therein described work in connection Ath Annexation No. 47 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -443 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -443, according to tha names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or a< known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, fore, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, Ora, and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga-That the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -443, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a�— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engfneerrs-19—po-rFlare hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trace ave been occupied. _ a �y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 TR 13318, FM Annexation CUP 87- 19.rCUP 87 -42, DR 87-41 and OR 87 -52 SECTION 1. Authority for Report Chapter s1,YDivisioni15 of then Streets and Higghways C de, State of 4, California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Descrfvtion Street lLightingoMaintenance D1 trit No. 1.alTheeCityeVCouncilihasne determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordf nary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas to the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications 2e specifications f have been prepared the dvelopers .The plansand street igntrasstipulatdne conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of lighting improvement on the and aadeea part of this report to the sane extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenancb activities an the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. .>ys M1 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs i No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. F Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, ,a condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in 0 this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. i Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and Institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerey Cost: *Nigh Pressure Sodium Yapor Lamm Size Total Lamps Rate No. of Total Annual Maint. Cost 5800L 461 X S 8.93 X Lamps • S 49,400.76 95DOL 16,000L Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YM Noe 47 Total 5800L 460 1 461 9500L 529 6 525 16,0001. 16 0 16 22,000L 4 0 4 27.500E 7 0 7 *Nigh Pressure Sodium Yapor Lamm Size Total Lamps Rate ri.)s Total Annual Maint. Cost 5800L 461 X S 8.93 X 12 • S 49,400.76 95DOL 16,000L 535 X $10.16 X 16 X $12.08 X 12 12 • 65,227.20 • 2,319.36 22,000L 4 X $13.84 X 12 664.32 27,500 7 X $15.31 X 12 3.123.24 Total Annual Maint. Cost $120,734.88 2. Total Assessment Units: YM Assess Units before this annexation • 17,160 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 205 Total Assessment Units 17,365 f Y 3. Cost oar Asses —ent Unit: Total Annual Na,ntenanca Cost a 512 .66 • 56.95 /year /unit o n s c o. 0, Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram 7 Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance Dtstrlct No. 16, Annexation No. 47. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Ergtneer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the lndfviautl assessments. x 1 t , ti EXHIBIT 'A' 1 Properties and improve vents to be included within Annexation No. 47 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: = Assess. No. of Lamps to be Annexed -Unfi— -27 Project Acreage 5ED61- 95WLI6�C- 2TOWL' SOOC Zone I TR13318 - -- 16 1 - -- - -- - -- - -- Z cs' �r„'Zane 2 CUP 87 -19 3.87 7.74 - -- - -- - -•- - -- :�.' CUP 87 -42 2.27 4.54 - -- OR 87-41 1.28 2.56 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 1 DR 87 -52 88.00 176.00 - -- 6 - -- - - - -- '' Pit 10941 1 Pcl 1 1.62 3.24 - -- -- - -- - -- - -- s' pcl 2 1.85 3.70 - -- pcl 3 3.82 7.64 TOTAL 102.71 205.42 1 6 - -- - -- -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 47 -F- i� ClTy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF 8AN RIRNARDINO �m N._ I I ASSESSMENT DIA>;RAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No.1 ANNEXATION NO. 47 �1 1 rc�?v -$FZ;=,%Vl6TA, Mt lrj6Tc4vR q cp ware¢ x CITY Of amCHo CUCAMOxaA Y^ WUN'P1' OF SAN BEgpA$DIItO ��6 a &TAU OP CALMUM '� T s ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 47 D %'S°'m•'^ CITY OI s, Y. RANC80 CUCAf[ONl3A . '� � COtINSY' OH 8AN HaRNARDINO CAI.II�OA 1�T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. $7 CITY Oa BA.VCHO CUCAbt0KGA .'¢,!�• = Cnmm Gip 8M MNA}RDENO :s STATE OF CAL17ORNIA A 4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 AVEXATION NO. 47 K K 4 x �.S r� ri r S,s:° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w DBR7 -5 COUNTY OF BAN :BUNARDINO `\ 3 &FATZ OF CAImwu T - -- - a, IiIJ� I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 47 i CITY OF RANCHO CUC"ONOA e COUM OF BAN EWARBINO STATE OF CALIPORNIA — N V�> w 1. `s STAFF REPORT V �' F DATE: August 3, 1988 t "� TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WO@C IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEKATION NO. 18 FOR PARCEL NAP 10941, OR 87 -52 AND CUP 87 -19 (INDUSTRIAL. /COMMERCIAL) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 It is recomanded that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for Parcel Map 10941, OR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /COmmercial). The developers of the subject projects have been notified of the Public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution Ho. 88 -444. Respectful ubmitted, :JA:dlw Attachments � ss 1 :m RESOLUTION N0. $ O - -! 9 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10941, DR 87 -52 AND CUP 87 -19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6TH day of July, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-445 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -445 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, fors, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention, were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -445, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City 6f Rancho Cucaagnga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -445, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved, a—nT— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer s pure hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. _ as.� CITY of RANCHO CUCOOGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. Annexation No. 18 for PM 10941, DR 87 -52 and CUP 87_19 SECTION 1. Authority far Depart This report Is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Higghwa s Code, State of Crlifornia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as veil as on the lots directly abutti.; one street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lightlny District Alias Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the str of lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacdnent of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination or the subject area. •,A��y, 4 A /S j. i. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs -• No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement 1 construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment Purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. `Street Improvements onaiocalstreets District street all Industrial,icoommercial and institutional protects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land In industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Is shown below: r 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No 18 Total 5800L 47 11 58 9500L 5 0 5 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate NO'S Maint. Cost 5BOOL 58 X f 8.93 X 12 $6,215,28 9500L 5 X $10,16 X 12 609,60 Total Annual Maint. Cost $6,824,88 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation.. 460 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 198 Total Assessment Units 658 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost $6 824 88 510,37 /year /unit No, 07 n s In Distr c Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. y �Sg n a Af .`'n ,c- t.%�`I:.:r'�[2i�.ki��y�J`r vi.Gr1'',,/�' .: .��;', _ _ -� - m�cw{4 +• z G:' t:.�i ' rti4� SECTION S. Assessment- Oiaoram Copies of the'Proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this "Street report and labeled Lighting Maintenance District No. 61 '77: Annexation No. 18. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the ` text of this report. .,4 SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to ail units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based an acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. �Si , #4i EXHIBIT W Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 18 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Project Acreage PM 10941 7,29 DR 87 -52 88.00 CUP 87 -19 3.87 99.16 s= Assess. No, of Lamps to be Annexed MR— THdO_L j5 L --666D1 -3iL 14.58 3 ___ ___ ___ 176.00 --- ___ ___ --- 7.74 8 198.32 11 ___ ___ r�. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO. 18 S,�i• Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA - — ,. PM I(�g4-I COUNTY OF SAN BEBNmmmo 1 STATE- OF CALIlORNIA 1+r= � ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION NO. IS S.siSd crrY Ot RANCHO CUCAMONGA :. _; • COUNTY OF SAN BEBNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. /P .si w CITY QY RANCHO CUCA IONOA COUNTY OF &4X UWAWIXO n e: 9TATS OF CALIFO1tNIA l,�J „ T t. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 3, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 22 FOR PM 10941, OR 86 -08, OR 87 -52 AND CUP 87 -19 (INDUSTRIAL/ COM4ERCIAL) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT W. 3 RECONEIMBATTOW: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Bo. 22 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /AHALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the :Ark in connection with Annexation No. 22 to Landscape Maintenance District Ho. 3 for PH 10941, DR 86 -08, DR 67 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /Commercial). The developers of the subject projects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -446. Respectf submitted, RI94�dA:s Attachments I RESOLUTION N0. $ 8 - SDa A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PN 10941, OR 86 -08, OR 87 -52 AND CUP 87 -19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of July, 1968, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -447 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 22 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -447 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk. and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headad "Notice of Improvement°, was duly and legally posted in the time, fors, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -447, according to the names and addresses of surw owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerw of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Nailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council heving now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of" annexationaton9the Distrrictpandithenor eringnofcthe work Ceand gsaid sCity Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -447, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer sihereny finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin untTT Fife- r 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance nistrict No. 3 Annexation No. 22 for rM 10941. DR 86 -08, OR 8752 and CUP 87_19 SECTION 1. Authority for P ^Dort This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cdllfornia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. Gcneral Description Tl,is City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho C:icamonga. SECTION 3, Plans .md Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approral for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for pirkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based on historical data, contra % anal -sis and developed . work standards, it is estimated that maintenance cost- 'Jr ens^_ssment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) cents per square foot per year. Tixse costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cast data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention. basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the Project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. &S s 1 ■ Zone 2 is camprised'uf all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District .p All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net Icre basis, for the maintenance of landscaped median islands an Haven - Avenue from 4th Street to'Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard an Ha Street from west to easy City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from ster Avenue to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and soma parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay are,,. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 inclu Annexation No. 22 1s as follows. ding Zone 1 Total estimated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft Assessment units, acres Total cost • assessment unit for ea Existing District $2 070 8 $2_200770 • 5258.75 /year or 521.56/mo. /lot Existing Annexation New District No. 22 Total 0 D 1 380,643 100 380,743 y r and month M�x • S 0 /year 0 /mo./acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enuaeratad in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessme_ nt_ pi�o` A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. X6(0 l ny1 it t B1� 01I SECTION 6. Assessment 1;1 Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all �i lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel At, for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for euh lot or parcel in Zone 2. • The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as req-jired e by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. •_ SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of In`eation to Annex to District mid sets r public hearing date. ±� 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to'the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files r. rtport with tin City Council.' 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hea•Ing and approves, or modifies snd approves the individual assessments. a S Properties and 1ngrovements to be Included within Annexation No. 22 (Zane 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3; PROPERTIES PROW m ACREAGE --u5 Pcl 1 1.85 pci 2 3'29 pcl 3 1,29 OR 86 -08 1.0 OR 87 -52 �'0 (pcl 1, PM 6658) CUP 87 -19 3,87 100„ 16 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEAATION N0. 1 Haven Avenue Foothill Boulevard Milliken Avenue 4th Street Rochester Avenue 6th Street u � Area Sa —Tt.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 5 .�1 .i r< t ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. =1 ANNEXATION N0. .2a 6Y �M CITY OF RANCHO CIrPu'1I0NGA PM 10 9 y��"S ENGINEERING DIVISION ' T ` m VICINITY N1AP Il \III nn 1 i n� 0 i� 0 r I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. -4 ANNEXATION N0, as I k""r �j L 111 S1T� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOi`GA p QRBb-08 — �; ENGINEERING DIVISION cl n1 n VICINITY MAP ,_ t •. r. r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LAA'DSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO.,AA 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCArVIONGA ^ b� j? ENGINEERING DIVISION N VICINITY MAP s 0 z 3 W II I I� d d ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ANNEXATION NO. 22 r+cn. w a- �R1�s.v15tA <:a�jlSjci�CW a' F•�UICt(o G�voNCr. t%^ �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,VvIONGA � � s ENGINEERING DIVISION A Nnn ' VICINITY MAP ay K m., STAFF REPORT � 4 S� DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire. City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH AuNLKATIOk 40. 49 FOR TRACT No. 13318, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND MUQANITA DRIVE, TO LtHDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECOMMENDATION: It is recoaaaended that City Council appprove the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Mnexation No. 49 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 49 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Po. 13318, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita Drive. The developer of the subject tract has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -448. Respect PUI tted, r" — Attachments I D 73 RESOLUTION NO. O � �% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 49 TO OIL ENNER'EEOR�INO. ACCEPTI G THE FINAL ENG NEESRPFORIRACT NO. 13318 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga did an the the tthereinJ described,workpiniconnectioniwithfAnnexation No. 49 ttoo9Landscape Maintenance District Ho. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -449 was duly and legally published in the tine, fora and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication if said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and Pesolution of Intent on, headedp "Nott "Notice Iproveement', was passage andflegally posted in tLe time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of Me City Clerk; mod Resolution Hof Intention were adulyimoaailedrito allopersonsfowning realoprope ty proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -449, according to or names and addresses of such owners as ofeRanchoaCucamonga. which said mailin mmaailedd in the time, form,Cand manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. Rancho Cucamonga Thatlthespubiicyinterestdand onvenienceurequiresttheCi� of_ annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -449, be done end made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessmen% fn iTie-Ingineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until Rfe—r 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 7�/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 49 for Tracts 13318 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description MaintenancetDistrictino. 1. ThedCity Councillhaswdeterminedothat theLareasato be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 13318 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications - o The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or develnpment plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the sane extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.301 cents per' square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 49 is as follows: Existing Annex New District Ile. 49 Total Landscape Area 123,064.60 7,400 130,464.60 No. of D U. 9,921 16 9,937 7S 4 Per Lot Annual Assessment i t r 130,4.60 x S .30 • $39 $391 393 � $39.41 , . $S.00 315, W X 0 f Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated In Section 6 and the ti attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation i involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated ? for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assesuments shall be reduced. r w SECTION S. Assessment Diagram S labeled 'ExhibiteA% bysthissr eferencedtherdiagrantischereby inco poratedad within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment lots within thesDistrict andtthat to be equaliforneach unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the Previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments s required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer -s Repart. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report Witt. the City Council. S. Every year to June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. p Properties and iaprovenents to be Included within Annexation No. 49 to Landscape . Maintenance District No. 1: TRACT L -- MAINTAINED AREA STREET 'Salt. 13318 1E Hermosa Avenue (to 7.400 12 Manzanita to Rasberry) Manzanita Drive 20 Kernwood Court 31 W r .5 4 I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION NO. 49 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,-vIONGA �s ENGINEERING DIVISION C^ VICINITY MAP N rm •9 t b CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,-vIONGA �s ENGINEERING DIVISION C^ VICINITY MAP N rm — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 3, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8y: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Subject: Proposed Parking Restrictions on Alta Cuesta and Valle Vista RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that parking be prohibited on portions of Alta Cuesta and Valle Vista to eomply with recommendations by the California Munfcipal Insurance Authority and the results of the Red Hill Neighborhood Traffic Study. MCK0t0W /AWYSIS This proposal is being made to alleviate the Alta Cuesta width problem identified in the liability safety audit for the CaL'fornia Municippal Insurance Authority, and to alleviate the Valle Vista width problom identified in the Red Hill Neighborhood Traffic Study. The safety audit noted that Alta Cuesta is too narrow to accommodate parking on both sides and still allow adequate lane widths for two -way traffic. The audit recommended complete removal of parking or conversion of Alta Cuesta into a one -way street. Complete parking prohibition would pose an unreasonable hardship on this residential area and making the street one -wry would transfer an intolerably high traffic volume on parallel local streets. In seeking a more reasonabla solution, staff has determined that selective removal of parking on one side of Alta Cuesta only, would permit safe two -waj traffic flow. There are short portions where parking will be prohibited on both sides due to physical conditions which make parking very undesireable. The parking prohibition is changed frov one side to the other to equally distribute the impact. On Valle Vista, due to very narrow widths on a portion where a centerline is needed, some parking Prohibition is also proposed. There should be very little impact to residents by this restriction. Two neighborhood meetings have been held where residents gave input affecting :nis recommendation. Attached are maps showing the proposed no parking anytime' zones and centerline changes. Respec ly submitted, Attac nt 7? Date: To: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA6IONGA STAFF REPORT July 13, 1988 Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer M44% By: Chuck Mackey, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Permit Parking Only District for the Alta Loma High School K?ighborho,)d RF.COM EWTIOk: A request for Council concurrence to bring a Resolution forming Parking District A as modified from a neighborhood meeting feedback and further analysis or other directior. bACK6R0 W /AMALTSIS• At the May 4, 1988 meeting of the City Council, a resolution for the formation of a Permit Parking Only District around Alta Loma High School was considered. Before proceeding further, the Council directed staff to meet with the residents who would need parking permits to park on their residential streets. On June 29, 1988 a neighborhood meeting was held for those residents who would be impacted by the proposed parking restrictions. These residents were notified by mail and the riling included a citizen input sheet which could be mailed back or brought to the meeting. Approximately 460 notices were mailed. Approximately 60 citizens attended the meeting and identified intrusive parking by students as a definite problem. Other sources of intrusive parking were also identified from citizen input: 1) the ball field at the north end of the high school generates lots of usage by young adults. Their parked vehicles line LaVine Street, Cielito Street end Opal Street on weekends during daytime and weekdays until nighttime, 2) The Red Hill Park ball fields generate intrusive parking into the residential areas to the east of the park and is especially bad during weekends. It should be noted that their streets were not targeted as having a high school intrusive parking problem, however one resident did attend and forcefully made his point about the parking intrusion. Twenty -five citizen input forms were mailed to us and nine were received at the meeting. A petition favoring installation of the permit parking also was received at the meeting and contained twenty names. a�a Crty Council Staff Report Re: Permit Parking District A August 3, 1908 Page 2 A show of hands at the meeting showed the audience equally split on the issue. Analysis of the input sheets and petition shows 57 in favor and 16 showing some fors of opposition inlcuding five who went to be excluded, two who want modification to the proposal, four who totally oppose a parking district, and five who believe our intent 1s to issue parking permits to the students. Citizens feel frustrated over student parking, rude student behavior, speeding traffic on the residential street system, adequate pedestrian safety, especially for young children and lack of enforcement of the existing two hour parking limit on some streets in the urea. Many at the meeting expressed that daily parking enforcement will be necessary to make the restriction function. Several requests for 3 -way stop control at Opal end LaYine were expressed. This request has been analyzed and a 3 -way s'cop is warranted at this time. A work order has been issued for a 3 -way stop control Installation. Modification of Initial Proposal: The cumber of streets to have the arking rem r c ons sea attached sap) should be reduced. It is elieved that a high percentage of the residents living on these streets perceive the parking intrusive as a problem and desire a parking district to alleviate the problem. If the intrusive parking relocates to a nearby street, the residents on the newly impacted street may submit a petition to the City Engineer indicating that 75% are in favor of extending the restrictions to their street. Two sets of restrictions are proposed for the parking district: 1) East and West of the school which is not affected by weekend ball field Parking would ofdthe school which "School affected byAbothtstudent and ball field parking, the restriction should be 'Daily 6 A.M. to 8 P.M.' Comitaent of daily, on -going parking enforcement will be necessary to make the parking district function. Staff requests concurrance by City Council to proceed with this district and restrictions as modified and to bring back a resolution to that affect or directive to pproceed otnerwlse. Additionally, since the parking intrusion caused by the Red Hill Park ball field use has just been identified and has not had any data collected or analysis made, Council direction of whether to further analyze the problem Is requested. Resp 4YIttel', Attachment 0 R3 -r+ ORDINANCE No. .5'9 - C. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDING CHAPTER 10.50 TO TITLE 10 OF TF.E RANCHO CUCAMONGA HONK =PAL CODE TO PrOVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMIT PARKING DIETRICTG THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: t% section l: Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 10.50, to be read, in words and figures, as follows: _ Chapters, th©nfollowing Qt- ermsfshallohave theufollowingis meanings: _ "A. "Enineer- City of Rancho Cucamonga orehis orehertdesignee. of the B s established by reclutionrofn the icity Council swherein a Parking restrictions apply to all vehicles except vehicles which have been issued a parking permit pursuant to this Chapter and vehicles exempted by Section 10.50.100. 1 "Chanter 14.54 "EerMi Par;SAg DistriCta nSectiena• 10.50.010 Definitions. 10.50.020 Designation of permit parking districts; Findings. 10.50.030 Minimum size. 10.50.040 Petitions. 10.50.050 Signs. 10 50.060 Exemption for permit holders. ' 10.50.070 Issuance of permits. 10.50.080 Guest parking permits. 10.50.090 Display of permits. 10.50.100 Exempt vehicles. 10.50.110 Authority of engineer. 10.50.120 Permit Fees. 10.50.170 Dissolution of permit parking district. 10.50.140 Penal provisions. Chapters, th©nfollowing Qt- ermsfshallohave theufollowingis meanings: _ "A. "Enineer- City of Rancho Cucamonga orehis orehertdesignee. of the B s established by reclutionrofn the icity Council swherein a Parking restrictions apply to all vehicles except vehicles which have been issued a parking permit pursuant to this Chapter and vehicles exempted by Section 10.50.100. 1 "�-. - ...tar`... ' -. ` i•J ��;. r s "y."C.= .c -. "C. "Resident" a dwelling unit located withinaasPermitsParkinglDistrict. intending to• visit eatresidentain aePermiti Parking g or District. "Section districts; d�•'•�• Desionation pt pmt �g Permit Parking DDistrictsabyireaol tlon.Maynestablish resolution shall designate the boundaries of the Permit Parking District and shall specify the nature of the parking limitations which apply within the district to operators of vehicles other than vehicles which have been issued a permit pursuant to this Chapter, or which are exempted from this Chapter pursuant to Section 10.50.100. Every such resolution shall be based on the findings as follows: "A. commuter vehicles, defined as those vehicles operated by persons whose destinations are to non - residential areas or uses, do or may substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use by residents; "H. The interference by commuter vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals; "C. That the commuter vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution or devaluation of real property in such proposed district; "0. That se%,n.; -fives parcant (75%) of the residents within the pr ,ad district desire, agree or request permit parking privileges (unless established by City Council action in absence of a petition); _ "E. no unreasonable dislaceme commuter vehiclesawill result into surroundingnt of residential areas; "P. That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is feasible or practical. "section x• •434• dinimp size. Permit Parking Districts shall contain at least four (4) blacks or at least one (1) mile curb frontage. petitiootthencitySCouncil kvlitl2aa- " the establishing ofaa Permit Parking District. Any such petition shall designate the boundaries of the proposed district and shall be signed by at least seventy -five percent (754) of the residents within the proposed district, such a petition shall be filed with the Engineer who shall prepare a report to the City council on the proposed district, including the Engineer's recommendation- regarding the establishment thereof. The Engineer shall forward his report together with the petition to tha City Council. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the city Ccuncil to establish a Permit Parking District in the absence of such a petition. "Section 1Q.SQ.D_ Q. Slone. Upon the establishment of a Permit Parking District, the Engineer shall cause appropriate signs to be erected in the district, indica`.ing thereon the parking limitation applicable to the district and the exemption therefrom of vehicles with permits. The regulations pertaining to any permit Parking District shall not apply until �'qns or markings giving adequate notice thereof have ba. , placed. "Section 12.5.0•,M. Exempt &D L4= permit The parking limitations imposed within a Permit Parking District pursuant to this Chapter shall not apply to vehicles for which a parking permit pertaining to that district has been issued and displayed in the manner prescribed in Section 10.50.090. No such permit shall reserve any particular parking place within the district to the holder of the permit. Each such permit shall be valid only for the Permit Parking district for which it is issued. "Section 14•SQ•QZ4• I=anca 3S eamila. Applications for permits to park within a Permit Parking District may be made by any resident within such district. Such applications shall be filed with the Engineer. Unless otherwise prescribed by the resolution establishing the district, not more than three (3) permits (exclusive of guest parking permits) shall be issued to residents of any single dwelling unit. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Engineer may appeal such decision to the City Manager, whose decision on the matter shall be final. "Section 22.52.M. Guest marking Permits. Unless otherwise prescribed in the resolution establishing a Permit Parking District, each resident holding a parking permit shall be entitled to receive guest parking permit 3 forms from the Engineer. Such resident, unless modified by resolution, may issue a guest parking uermit to any guest of such resident by noting such resident's name and address on the form, dating and signing the form and identifying the vehicle for which the permit is issued by license number on the form. Each such guest permit parking permit shall be valid until 12:00 noon of the day following the date of issuance. Any vehicle for which a guest parking permit has been issued shall be exempt from the parking limitations while parked 300 Poet or closer of residence being visited within the district during the period for which it is valid, provided such permit is displayed in the manner prescribed in Section 10.5o.o9o. "Section 14,�j,�s, Diaolav Si permits• "A. A parking permit issued pursuant to this Chapter (other than a guest parking pormit) shall be Permanently affixed to the lower driver side of the inside of the rear window of the vehicle for which it was issued. "H. Guest parking permits shall 6e displayed Pace up on the driver front dashboard oP the vehicle for which it was issued. "Section 14.5-.4.=. Exeunt vehicles. _. ci les• The following vehicles are exempt from the parking restrictions applicable to any Permit Parking District: utility, dellverypand� ervicenvehiclesfbeing usedtinnthe course of business. "B. Vehicles owned or operated by any governmental agency, or contractor of a governmental agency, being used in the course of business. "C. Emergency, life support and health care ' vehicles being used in the course of business. Z=i2ns4t2uAh bls�gne T. The Engineer toest lhlesan procedures and to produce signs, forms and other materials necessary or appropriate to implement the provisions of this Chapter. "Section i4.5-4•izs• Pstmit ES_fls. The City Council may, by resolution, establish fees for permit applications undor this Chapter. "Section 14.54.114. Dissolution 21 PgMalt marking districts. The city Council may, by resolution, torminate and dissolve any previously established Permit Parking District. "Section 14.54.145• Penal 2=X1alena. "A. Unless exempted by the provisions of this Article, no person &hall stand or park a motor vehicle in any Permit Parking District in violation of arty parking restrictions established pursuant to this Chapter. "B. No person shall falsely represent himself or herself as eligible for a parking permit or furnish false information to the Engineer or his representatives in an application for a parking permit. "C. No erson who has Permit shall thereafter allow the usenthereof bypanyinq other person. "D. No person shall copy, produce, treats or use any facsimile or counterfeit parking permit. the provisions Ofythis an declared by Punishable by a fine not to exceed that set by the current uniform county -wide bail schedule established pursuant to the terms of the California Vehicle Code." clause �4II 2: If any section, subsection, sentenco, held to Portion of of any decision or legislationsshallonotraffectPtheeValidityto [nt such remaining portions of this ordinance. The City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that Is would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irre.l- Live of the fact that- any one portionsibesdeclaredtinval !lenunconstitutional or preempted. seaa City Clerk certify Pa iof this ordinance and shallcusethe same t beubli hedwithn fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in 1hg Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. r • k CCfY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: Mayor and'Meebers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ANNE%ATION AGREEMENT 88-01 16a t MWo" ( — A request to approve an - annexa on agreement or evelopment and annexation of a 96 acre Rortlon of San Bernardino County unincorporated area ocated at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 226- 071 -65. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution approving an annexation agreerent for development and annexation of a 96 acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area. (The annexation agreement is attached to the Resolution.) II. BACKGROLrw0: On June 1, 1988, the City Council approved a aso u on of Intent to annex this property in the unincorporated area of the County which borders the City along 24th Street. Subsequently, the City sent an application for annexation of this property to the Local Agency Formation Commission ( LAFCO) for processing. LAFCO has scheduled the hearing on the annexation for September 21, 1988. On July 20, 1988, the City Council approved a Development District Amendment to prezone the subject property for Lot, Density Residential Development (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in accord.- with the City General Plan Designation for the an„ On that date, the Council also approved a Development Agreement. An Environmental Assessment was completed for the Development District Amendment and the Development Agreement and a Negative Declaration 364 and 365 was issued. The second reading of Ordinances approving the prezone and Development Agreement is also on this agenda under Consent Ordinances. Action on the second readings of Ordinances 364 and 365 should be taken after the Council has taken action on the Annexation Agreement. �9/ .;L'`.21; j"* 4- -� —C IW *60U k I U .F V TERRANCEtHELCHER;7-98-01' August 3,t21988;-� t P 2 age Mi 0, 117. C04CLUSION: .Approval' oV. the - attached Resolution-a roving the annexe on agriement1will-cosplete the roval s mfedff to 'proceed' K with the inaexation-and development of &P subject property within the City. Rasp ally ittedl� s 8 d le City anner Attachment: Exhibit 11* Location Map Resolution Approving Annexation Agreement (includes Annexation Agreement) v P O } M SPHERE PLANNING AREA 1/1101111 City Limits •�, Unincorporated Area Within City tlphoro of Intluorra• CITY OF R AMHO CLCA.Wi CA PLANNING DIVISION IMt, 8MIV rATICA/ 88-D( TITL& !- O GA l (D aJ 4 A T> HI s _1_ SCALE- — �_ Y r. T Ar • RESOLUTION, 110. $ ' S Oa- A resolution of the City Council of the,City* of. Rencho Cucawnga; Californid approving an annexation agreement for development and annexation of a 96 acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street. WHEREAS, The owners have requested annexation to the City; and WHEREAS, The subject property is located within the established Sphere of Influence of the City, and is contiguous to current City limits; and WHEREAS. The annexation of the property will represent,a logical extension of the City's boundaries and urban services, and WHEREAS, On June 1 1988, the City Council reviewed the proposed annexation and passed a resolution of intent to annex the subject property to the City and directed staff to file an application for Change of Organization (annexation) with the Local Agency Formation Comission; and MHEREAS, On July 20, 1988, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing and approved pre- zoning for the subject property for tow density residential use (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and issued a Negative Declaration of effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, On July 20, 1988, the City Council h41d a duly noticed public hearing, approved a Development Agreement between the applicant and the City for 4evelopment of the subject property, and issued a Negative Declaration of effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, On August 3, 1988, the City Council held a public hearing to review the attached Annexation Agreement and determined that the annexation of the property to the City would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City in that development of the property could be in conformance w;th the City's General Plan and Development Code. WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California desires to support a Change of Orgdnization (Annexation) in accordance with• — Goverruxnt Code Section 56195 for the above described rroperty. _ NOW, ,HEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve, determine, and order that the attached Annexation Agreement, (which is EXHIBIT A to this resolution, and is by this 'eference incorporated herein as though fully set forth) be approved and entered into as of this 3rd day of August, 1988. t 3 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND, WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: Beverly A. Authelat City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 This ANt=ATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered int0 to be F RANCHO on 1963, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO C(JCAMOxGA, a mOn c p� "corporation of the State of California ( "City"), and DORIS DAY, FRANK DE VOL and GRACE DE VOL (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner "). A. $lpusjQ. i the f Sn Bernardino ytain the unincorporated area Oa County, consisting of approximately 96 acres, generally located at the described in Exhibit E "A "a d herc oand hereinafteroreferred to ularly "the Property." (ii) Owner desires to annex the Property to the City if Agreementoattached hereto,as Exhibitt "B° ("the Development Agreement" hereinafter). ( the Devclopment Property (III) thetcityewould benbonoficialntoaCity andtie concurrently providing assurances tc, Owner of Owner's permission to develop the Property by entering into the Development Agreement. B. Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows: �)-9.s 3" Initiation Gl prareedlM&- Subject to Paragrnph 2 below, City shill initiate and diliger,, ly pursue to comppletion proceedings for annexation of the propperty to the city in as expeditious a manner as possible and in accordance with the provisions of the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sections 56000, At M., the "Cortese -Knox Act "), and all other applicable laws. city has previously or concurrently herewith adopted a Resolution of Application to Annex and promptly shall submit tho proposal for annexation of the Property to the City to the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Bernardino County ( "LAFCO"), city agrees to Comply with all reasonable and normal conditions and requests for additional Information and .aente imposed by LAFCO in connection with the annexation oposal. City agrees to negotiate in good faith with the county _ San Bernardino ( "county ") as to the real property tax exchange between the city and the County to the end that such exchange is +greed upon at the earliest possible time. Attar LAFCO has made its order of determinations with respect to the annexation proposal and, provided that City has approved the Development AgreomeM: as provided in Paragraph 2 below, city shall complete the annexation proceedings. It is the intent of Owner and city that thin annexation proposal approved by LAFCO authorize t.ne city to proceed with the annexation without notice and hearing and without election. In that regard, Owner agrees to consent to the annexation and, further, Owner shall forthwith suspend its activities and processes related to obtaining land use entitlements for the site or any portion or portions thereof from the County of San Bernardino. 2. completion s1 Annexation pL4445QSC,.,iB. Notwithstanding the provisions Of Paragraph 1 above, City shall not adopt a resolution ordering the annexation of the Property to the city, nor authorize the Clerk of the City to transmit a certified copy of such resolution pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Act to the Executive Officer of LAFCD until City's city Council approves the Development Agreement. 3- Eny1ro mentzl Raview. In connection with approval of the Development Agreement, city shall undertake all necessary sary and appropriate review and evaluation of the potential environmental impacts thereof and the development of the Property in accordance therewith on a timely basis and in conformity with All legal requirements, and shall be the "lead agency" for pu"POses of the California Environmental quality Act. 4• NOtices. Any notice to either party shall be in writing by delivering pailitn n orbyendinthe smebyregiteredor certifiedm,reur receipt requested, or Express Mail, with postage prepaid, to the �Q � party's mailing address. The respective mailing addresses of the parties are, until changed as hereinafter provided, the following: City: city of Rancho Cucamonga 9220 Base Line Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Attn: Larry Henderson, Senior P1aMOr Owners Terrance P. Nelcher P.O. Box 8166 Universal City, California 91618 Either party may change its mailing address at any tins by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided herein at least tan (10) days prior to the date such clangs is affected. All notices under this Agreement shall be deemed given, received, made or communicated on the date personal delivery is affected or, if mailed, on the delivery date or attempted delivery date shown on the return receipt. S. Attorneve' Peen. If legal action is brought by either party against the other for breach of this Agreement, or to compel performance under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an &ward of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. 6. Heaation p= Partnership. The ggartiaa specifically acknowledge that development of the Property is a private development, that neither party is acting as the aga:at of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. None of the terms or provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between or among the parties in the businesses of Developer, the affairs of City, or otherwise, nor shall it cause them to be considered joint venturers or members_ of any joint enterprise. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create any third party beneficiary rights in any Person who is not a party, unless otherwise provided. 7. soverabllity. Invalidation of an of the provisions contained in this Agreement, or a! the application thereof to any Parson, by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions hereof or the application thereof to any other Person or circumstance and the same shall remain in full force and effect, unless enforcement of this a.C/ 2 Agreement as so invalidated Would be unreasoneblelor grossl y A inaquitabla under all the circumstances or Would fruetrata the purposes of this Agreement: _} S. FxbJ L*i•__All Exhibits to Which reference is nude horain are deemed incorporated Into this Agreement in their "V. ` entirety by reference;therato. 9• =XX kQrGGs*nt. This Wrlttun Agri;mant� and ,the Exhibits hereto contain- all'the representations;and�thi!antire agreement betwsn, the- parties -with =rexpect to tha- subject flatter hereof. �} - Except as,otherwiiie- apecified -ln thia Agresment;,any; prior correspondence ;�memorandt;'agreemants, Warranties or .< representations are eupirseded in total by -,this Agreement and Exhibits hereto, and)auch memoranda. , 4 20. Cons tZ11 A 21 Aare JH Mt-- The provisions cf'-this Agrs eament and the be Exhibit hereto shall construed as a whole according to their common meaninq ant not strictly for or-against ' any party and connistont -wLth the provisions'horazf, in order to achieve the objectives and purpose of the parties hereunder. The captions preceding the text: of each article, ■sction,;subsartion and the Table of Contents hereof ore included only for - convenience of reference and shall be disregarded in the construction and interpretation of this Agreement. Wherever required by the context, t.`.e singular shall include the plural and vice versa, and the masculine gander shall include the feminine or neuter genaers, or vice versa. - ' 11. Furtha A==AaM: Cotenant Each party covenants, on behalf of itself and its •' successor&, heirs and assigns, to tale all actions and do all things and to execute, With acknowledgment or a'firAavit if required,,any and all documents and writings that. may be nacessary or proper to achieve the purposes and objectives of this Agreement. 12. Governing yU, This Agreement, and the rights and. obligations of the parties, shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of ("iltfornia. 13. CoUaterma s. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall ba deemed an original, but all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one instrument. -1 The partioe have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CrLY OF RANCHO CDCAVONGA, a municipal ccrp,�ration of the S2ato of California By Ita Karor By Its City Clark APPROVED AS TO FORK: BY__ Its City Attorney S 11-71 Dor .e Day Frank De Vol Grace De Vol ,i e, t a T` LEGAL DESCRIPTION - TRACT 13527 PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF EFIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO). PREPARED JUNE 16. 19UB THE PARCEL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: t The Southeast one- quarter of the Southwest one - quarter and the South one -half of the Southeast onu- quarter of Section 20. Townshlp 1 North. Range 6 West San Bernardino Meridian in the County of San Bernardino, State of California according to the official plat thereof. Except therefrom the Westerly 150 feet of the Southeast one- quarter of the Southwest one - quarter of said section 20 Also ey -pt therefrom that portion conveyed to the Southern Surplus Realty Company described as follows; That portion of the Southeast one- quarter of the Southwest one - quarter and that portion of the South one -half of the Southeast one quarter, all Section 20, Townohip 1 North. Range 6 West. San Bernardino Base and Meridian, lying Northwesterly and Westerly of a line and its Southerly prolongation which Is parallel with and distant 100 00 feet Southeasterly and Easterly, meanured at right angles from the following described surveyed reference line: Conanencing at the point of Intersection of the East line of said Section 20 and a line parallel with and distant 13U 00 feet Northerly. measured at right angles from the Ilortheriy line of said Southeast one - quarter of Section 20, .a •I port being South 0 70'32• West 2510.50 feet, measured ai ig snid East line from a found two £2) Inch County So veyor s Monument at the Northeast corner of paid Section :D, said point also being North 0 00132' East 2770.50 feet. ^asured along said Ea9t line from a found one (1) Inch ounty Surveyor s Monument at the Southeaut corner of said _ ectlono thence North no 27101 West, along said parallel line a distance of 1147 74 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BE3INIIING: thence South 44 44 00' West 3604.72 feet to a i point that Is North 0 15'39 Wcst 125 00 feet from the South line o sa,d Section U. 1 -inq measured alono the Northerly Mr_7 )1 17 - Legal Description Tract 13527 Page 2 i prolongation of a line paraliel with and distant 230.00 feet Easterly, measured at right angles from the Easterly line of e West one -half of the northwest one - quarter of Section 29, Township 1 North; Range 6 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridians thence South 0.15139' East along said prolongation a distance of 125.00 feet to a`point In said South, line of Section 20, said point being North 09 241150 West 1090.76 feet, measured along said South line from a found 1 1/2 Inch County Surveyor's Monument at the South one - quarter corner of said Section 20, Bald point also being South 89 241150 East 1550.80 feet measured along said South line from a found 1 1/2 Inch County Surveyor's Monument at the Southwest corner of said Section 20. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion lying within the Westerly 150 feet of the southeast one - quarter of the Southwest one - quarter of said Section 20. Also except therfrae that portion condemned to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District described as follows; thor • portions within' Southerly 50 feet of said Section 20. Approximate Area 91.83 Acres. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council F.n.OM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: OWNER CONSENT AND INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC_PRESERYATION I. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council discuss the Moen ves and give direction to the Historic Preservation CoWssion. The Commission, to turn, will explore these incentives further and came back to the Council with specific recommendations. 11. Background• The City Council has requested staff to summarize information about existing arA potential incentives for designation of landmarks. The purpose of incentives is to encourage owners to support designation and overcome owner objections. III. Owner Objections: Owners who oppose designation typically object to the provision that exterior changes must be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission. Owners art concerned that they will have to spend additional time and money on changes to their property and that the Commission and the Council may at some time refuse to grant them an alteration permit. Most are not aware of how existing incentives can be of benefit to them. Some argue that landmark designation takes away their property rights. From the city's perspective, landmark designation assists in the retention and restoration of a rare and valuable community resource. As time goes by, the percentage of structures from Rancho Cucamonga's early years diminishes. There are onir too or three hundred pre-world War II structures not severely remodeled or deteriorated, a small number in this city which is rapidly approaching the 100,000 population mark. Protection of these buildings and sites is similar to requirements for deep setbacks, limited lot coverage, heavy landscaping, and use of first rate building materials. They all contribute 0 the creation of a city that is a pleasing, interesting, livable place. L CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION August 3, 1988 Page 2 Owner consent is not required rmr has it been a legal issue since the U.S. Supreme Court's 197u Mcision involving New York City's Grand Central Terminal, Penn Central Transportation Co. V. New York CI. The case confirmed that protection of landmarks is an entirely permissable governmental goal, that a landmark designation' program is an appropriate way to achieve this goal, that application of a landmarks ordinance does not effect a taking of property as long as an owner is able to obtain a reasonable return on investment, that the preservation of landaarks benefits all residents, both economically and by improving the quality of life in the city as a whole. However, in Rancho Cucamonga, where most historic and architectural resources are not concentrated in districts but are scattered, where rapid development threatens to destroy the few surviving remnants of the past, and where the value of historic P reservation may not yet be recognized, it is important to provide a variety of incentives designed to appeal to a brad spectrum of owners. Without positive action to counterbalance the destructive power of time, ignorance, and narrow vision, Rancho Cucamonga's reminders of earlier days will be lost along with the enrichment that these places bring to the lives of citizens now and in the futire. Iv. ixisting Incentives: Rancho Cucamonga already offers several good preservation incentives A. Adaptive Reuse: Section 17.08.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga eve oilmen a offers a powerful incentive for designation. It allows within residential districts the conversion and "adaptive reuse" of homes that nave been designated as landmarks. Many potential landmarks are on major streets and lend themselves to adaptive reuse. Non - residential uses such- as offices, bed and breakfast inns, boutiques, studios and the like are permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. Other residential properties do not enjoy this opportunity. B. Additional Housin Unit: The Etiwanda Specific Plan identifies moo a e s or c s ructures and excludes such structures from density calculaticns in proposed resid'ntial developments of one acre or core. The developnr is permitted the appropriate density and the "notable" structure is allowed to be an additional housing unit. ,3a/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION August 3, 3988 Page 3 C. Allowances for Nonconformities: Notable structures that are legal noncon orm ng uses and structures are considered conforming for lot size, setbacks, etc., in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Thus, an owner who wants to use a historic building for a business but whose building is not set back the required number of feet is not forced to tear down the building to meet the code. D. Historical Building Code: The stake mandated Historical Pulls ng a re re qu m lexibility in the application of building code requirements for landmarks. The Building Inspector makes a determination regarding the safety of the systems in questions, i.e., plumbing, electrical, structural, etc., and does not impose the standards of the current Uniform Building Code if the existing system is safe or can be made safe. The Historical Building Code can save a landmark owner a considerable amount of money. E. Federal Programs: Federal incentives for preservation and rehabilitationn of structures on the National Register of Historic Places include eligibility for Community Development Block Grant assistance and eligibility for ZO percent Income Tax Credits for certified rehabilitation of depreciable properties such as industrial, commercial, office, or rental residential structures. The Thomas Winery project may be eligible for these credits. In addition, income tax deductions are allowed for facade easements granted to a qualified organization (such as a city). Publicizing these incentives, publishing educational material about the City's history, cultural background, and architecture, and working with the coaraunity to help people understrnd that da ;ignation does not mean that property is 'frozen' could help create a better atmosphere for designation of landmarks. New fncentives would help even more. One note of caution: Thd complexities areJ time involved in adopting and carrying nut incentives should not be underestimated. V. Incentives Used in Other Cities: The following is a list of additional ncen rem use n o er California cities. Many are suggestions from the State Office of Historic Preservation and the California Preservation Foundation. They are classified here into five categories: A.) Money saving incentives; B.) Regulatory incentives that translate into greater flexibility in the use of landmark property; C.) Provision of services to owners of landmarks: D.) Awards, celebrations, and recognition; and E.) Loans 3oa- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION August 3, 1988 - Page 4 and grants. Each of these is briefly discussed below. Staff will Provide more information on incentives that the Council is interested in. A. Money- saving incentives. 1.) Waivin of Fees: Waiving of fees for development of Property arou. d a landmark or for Conditional Use Permits, inspection fees, etc., can be an effective way to communicate the City's cooperative spirit and save the owner money. Redland's orainance contains this provision. 2.) Mills Act and Conservation Easements: One incentive w c e ce s us can lower property taxes is the Mills Act, a device which enables a landmark owner to enter into a 10 -year preservation contract with the City or the Commission. It has been used in Palo Alto, Coronado, and Berkeley. The contract provides for the preservation of the property. It remains in force when the property is sold. The assessment is lowered to reflect the restrictions on the property. The state also enables a conservation easement to be donated in perpetuity to a qualified organization with an agreement that the owner maintain the historic property and make no changes without the authorization of the owner of the easement. Property taxes reflect the restrictions on the property, as in the case of the Milts Act. National Register properties can consider the worth of the easement a charitable donation under Federal tax laws. B. Regulatory Incentives. 1.) Non - conforming Use Expansion: One suggested code change Ts to condi ono y perm expansion of landmarks that- -are non - conforming uses if findings are made that the expansion would not adversely affect nearby property and would be helpful in maintaining the landmark A landmark single family house in a multiple family district, for example, could then be allowed to have an addition built on. 2.) Additional Housin Unit: A provision could be added to e Development CoGe-which would allow a landmark home to be a bonus unit in a proposed residential development. The Etiwanda Specific Plan contains this incentive. The perception that the addition of a unit is undesirable is counterbalanced by the fact that J CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT - INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION a August 3, 1988 Page 5 .r historical structures iccorporated into a new site plan can provide a high level of architectural interest and encourage site specific design instead of use of off- the -shelf plans. 3.) Another provision in the Etiwanda Specific Plan that could be included in the Development Code is the one that permits nonconformities to be considered conforming. This would allow adaptive reuse of residences that are, for example, too close to the, property line. 4.) Flexible Parking Requirements: Another suggested V,egulation c ange is f eT�UMty in determining the required number of parking spaces for uses in landmark buildings. Sometimes a specific use can be shown to need fewer parking spaces than the code requires. Amending the code to allow fewer spaces for landmarks when it can be justified could be a useful incentive. 5.) Demolition /Alteration Reviow Ordinance: Enacting an ordinance for rer ew o proper es on the list of surveyed buildings and other structures over 50 years old before demolition or exterior alteration would remove a disincentive for landmark designation, because landmarks would not be singled out. Several cities use this method. 6.) Transfer of DeVelopev:nt Rights: Large cities such as n rant sco ave use the TDR concept to allow more intense uses on "receiver" parcels in exchange for preservation of a historic property which is a - donor" parcel. C. Provision of Services to Owners of Landmarks. 1.) -Design Services: Some cities employ Ior contract with a pro es—f a rehabilitation architect or designer who offers design advice or even draws plans for landeark owners who are rehabilitating their property. 2.) Service - oriented Prograw: City staff can be advocates' oi—r Tan mar owners an run interference' at City Hall; give them priority when they come in with an application; be ready to listen or to offer assistance in whatever is rcquired, from locating skilled contractors to doing a National Register application. UNCIL :STAFF REPORT YES FOR;HISTORIC PRESERVATION 3, 1988 As such services increase, however, other work program items w1uld have to decrease. 3.) ' Morksho s and Classes: Cities have sponsored emons ra lons of ren0flitation skills, giver, classes in historical research, worked with local schools and colleges td create classes in rehabilitation techniques. and have 1oi(Aned actual rehabilitation of property,with teaching of these skills. Landmark owners could attend without charge. D. Awards, Celebrations, and Recognition. The City already ncognf its design award program, program administered by Some titles hold annual landmark owners. The S Interest in the city's environment for preservat have contributed to the resources through volunti excellent workmanship, to E. Loans and Grants excellence in rehabilitatfan with in the future may want a %eparate Historic Preservation Coaatssion. ers or cocktail parties to honor icentennial Celebration will. add :ory and help create a positive Recognition of individuals who ;ervatiOn of the city's historic work or advocacy or consistently : some examples, would also help. One of the best ways to encourage owners to support tesignatfon of their property as a landmark 1s to mako loo- inL,rest loans a grants available. Funds are sometices put in a revolving account; they can be used to lower the interest rate of loans offered by a local bank; there are a variety of ways to administer funds. The question is, where does the coney ccae t'rom7 A few sources (other than the general fund) that are u.sed in other Califorufa communities are listed below. 1.1 CommunfI Oevelo ent Block Grant Funds: Community V eve oilmen oc ran u s arealready—used in Rancho Cucamonga to provide rehabilitation grants and low interest loans for income qualified people. Redlands is undertaking a program to provide lower than market interest loans for people above the moderate income level who live in lower income target areas. 2.) Bed Taxes: Communities with numerous motels and hotels av a rae markeo a portion of their bed taxes for historic preservation and ruvlded a steady source of income for rehabilitation, facade improvements, and neighborhood revitalization programs. There are few such facilities - 3� CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION August 3, 1988 Page . At present in Rancho Cucamonga, but this is a source that the City might consider in the future. 3.) Park Bond Funds: In June of 1988. California voters passe F5pos on 70, a bond act that will provide funds for parklands, wilderness areas, and historic preservation. The funds are not yet available. They are to be used for rehabilitstiou for publicly owned or controlled property. City ownership of a facade easement is a sufficient propm -ty interest to qualify an important, Ilationai Register eligible, privately owned building for these rehabilitation funds which are awarded on a competitive basis. This source would likely be useful for only one project, it at all, but should be kept on file as a source for a building of major importance. 4.) Redevelopment Fords: In some_ cities, redevelopment funs are use or istorlc preservation. Spe -ial loan programs have been ^,et up to improve historic properties, and funds have been provided to move buildings, conduct studies, and implement plans that integrate historic buildinas into new developments. They also Cave been used to rovide new sites on which to move historic buildings that cannot remain on their original lots. 5.) Narks Historical Rehabilitation Act: Local governments can issue x -exeep revenue bonds to finance rchabilitation of landmarks. This has be,.n rarely used in California, apparently because of a $10,000,000 limit on capital expenditures, not enough to justify tie time and money involved to issuing bonds. Santa Ana, Sacramento, San Diego and Pasadena have used this Act. 6.) City Portion of Property Tax: Pasadena allocates to 'a - Or preserve on un a sum from its general fund that is equal to the City portion of property tax paid by •historic treasures.• Owners may apply for grants from these funds. VI. Recent Historic Preservation Co ®fission Action: The Historic r�erva on omo ss on s a so interested in exploring a variety of incentives. The Coadission hopes that with more incentives in place along with an outreach program more owners will be interested In designation of their property. In the meantime, the Commission has put on v (DM y F CITY COUNCIL STAFF, REPORT INCENTIVES FOR MISTORIC PRESERVATION August 3, 1988 z Page 8 hold Its program of three new designations per month from the list of surveyed properties. Evaluation of property that comes to its attention from current planning Is continuing. Res lly s itted, Br Bu r� City nne 88:AB:mlg cc: Historic Preservation Commission Jack Lam Larry Henderson Attachment: Pasadona Incentives Resolution i 3a � z� t. f :i 'M ..a.. r r' RESOLUTION NO. 5566 May 27, 1986 Introduced by Director William E. Thomson A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASADENA ESTABLISHING POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTAT OF INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION WHEREAS, preservation and appropriate rehabilitation of historic buildings in the City is of positive benefit to t .he residents of the City of Pasadena and supports the economic development of the City; and . WHEREAS, to further this goal and carry out the purposes of Chapter 2.46 of the Pasadena Municipal Code, policies shall be developed and implementation procedures prepared as incentives for the preservation and appropriate rehabilitation of cultural resources in the City as stated hereafter; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the City of Pasadena that: 1. All work receiving the benefit of these incen- tives, whenever a discretionary decision is required, shall be required to conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. _ 365 i; L 2. All applications and work receiving the benefit Of these incentives, whenever subject to a discretionary decision by the Planning Commission or other City commission, committee, hearing officer or other City officer, shall additionally be reviewed and be subject to the approval of the Cultural Heritage Cccaisdi :;n, 3. State Historical Building Code. The California State Historical Building Coda (Title 24, Part 8, California Administrative Code) s \all be applied to alterations to Pasadena historic treasures, landmarks, structures in land- mark districts and structurer of merit. 4. Architectural Services. The City shall retain an architect to provide architectural services for appro- priate alteration and rehabilitation of historic structures. The Cultural Heritage Commission shall determine priorities and allocations of survlce. The Gertz Court land lease funds, to1311ng $870.00 per month, shall be allocated to this purpose, plus additional funds as practicable. 5. waiving of Fees. The City shall waive fees for rehabilitation or restoration work on Pasadena historic treasures, subject to review by the Cultural Heritage Commission. The fees to be waived include building and electrical permit fees, plan check fees, design review fees and construction tax where applicable. 6. Fire Safe Poof Ordinance. Upon recommendation by the Cultural Heritage Commission, fees for compliance Y e a v � _3_ 316 with the Fire Safe Roof Ordinance shall ba waived for - 7� Pasadena historic treasurea when the historic character of i.� the building is preserved. fl`q 7. Development Rights Transfer. The Planning Department, Planning Comission and Cultural Heritage Commission shall propose a development rights transfer 6 - program to support preservation of Pasadena historic, treasures. F` 8. Property Tax Program. The City shall allocate l s a sum equal to the City portion of L•he property tax paid by a' Pasadena historic treasures to a special fund to support P preservation and rehabilitation of Pasadena historic treasures. City property tax monies regeived from chose structures shall be placed in a grant fund for rehabilita- tion and maintenance of designated treasures. Owners may apply for grant monies for specific projects. Projects will be reviewed and monies allocated by the Cultural Heritage Commission. 9. Recognition for Participation. In order to recognize the participation of owners of historic properties, the following activities shall be undertaken for Pasadena - - historic treasures. a A special historic treasure placue will be provided by the City for the structure. b. The City will host a- periodic :special event or reception to honor treasure owners. _3_ 316 �y'.•r; c. Special emphasis will be given In a landmark rj and treasure tour brochure. 10. Additional incentives may be adopted by the ?g' Board as appropriate. i 11. The recommerdatiohe contained heroin are hereby ' referred to the City Manager and City Attorney for required 4, referral to advisory bodies and developmont of procedures, tM� .ci ordinances, resolutions and environmental documents as •`= necessary and appropriate to carry out the policies stated herein. None of the said ••policies shall be considered as final until such necessary implementation measur)a as are legally required are completed and duly adopted. Adopted by the following votes Ayesi Directors Bogaard, Cole, Glickman, Heckman, Hughston, Thomson, C.•owley Noes: None `® '. f.. .. .. 1.. •�r.•7.4'�'i WEI.4 iT 4T. t: ,: ,+v .t7'.f •.: •7•w '. �.y ., :v�r'i; 1 J ";9C, ED U •0 f:qm 'N ?C71L49f �i. le�'E +• +9•wr JAL:ir i -' 31/ n � M c. ess ;P i I. Recommendation: Staff recommends. that the City Council designate ihe-9-P-10119 House, $702 Amethyst Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, a landmark. II. Back round: The Ledig House was recommended for landmark es gna on by Um Historic Preservation Commission and reviewed by the City Council in April of 1986. Designation was tabled, although the historic and architectural value of the house was not in Question. In December of 1987 the Historic Preservation Commission sent a "rorandum to the Council stressing their desire that this house be moved (and not demolished) and then designated for local landmark status. However, the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance does not permit a material change to be made to a prospective landmark until a decision has been made by the Council. (2.24.100H) The house was built in 1898 by Gerhardt (known as G.P.) L ®dig who was the first member of the prominent Ledig family to settle to - what was then called samosa. The family grew citrus on several ranches in the area; G.P. was the road foreman, making dirt tracks Passable. He also served as clerk of the School Board from 1903 - )913. His house is a simple Victorian style structure enlarged by later owners in a way that did not detract from its integrity. Designation was tabled because the city was considering purchasing the property which stands in the future Wilson Avenue right -of- way. The house has since been purchased by the City. 3 Pe_ I CITY OF MNCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BT: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TDESIGNATE THE G.P. LEDIG HOUSE 5702 I. Recommendation: Staff recommends. that the City Council designate ihe-9-P-10119 House, $702 Amethyst Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, a landmark. II. Back round: The Ledig House was recommended for landmark es gna on by Um Historic Preservation Commission and reviewed by the City Council in April of 1986. Designation was tabled, although the historic and architectural value of the house was not in Question. In December of 1987 the Historic Preservation Commission sent a "rorandum to the Council stressing their desire that this house be moved (and not demolished) and then designated for local landmark status. However, the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance does not permit a material change to be made to a prospective landmark until a decision has been made by the Council. (2.24.100H) The house was built in 1898 by Gerhardt (known as G.P.) L ®dig who was the first member of the prominent Ledig family to settle to - what was then called samosa. The family grew citrus on several ranches in the area; G.P. was the road foreman, making dirt tracks Passable. He also served as clerk of the School Board from 1903 - )913. His house is a simple Victorian style structure enlarged by later owners in a way that did not detract from its integrity. Designation was tabled because the city was considering purchasing the property which stands in the future Wilson Avenue right -of- way. The house has since been purchased by the City. 3 Pe_ I CITY,6ObNC1L STAFF NEPORT LEDIG HOUSE August 3, 1988 Page 2 Consideration was given to having it moved to a proposed Historic Homes Park at Chaffey College and a room used to house the Community- Foundation, but the proposal fell through and the park apparently will not materialize. Plans are to offer the house for sale with t9e condition that it be moved to a lot wit, , the City and the original lot be restored. The City will be accepting bids in the near future. III. Alternatives: The Council can do c,e of three things. It can deny es gna on, although the house was found to meet the criteria for designation In the ordinsnca; it can designate the house a Point of Historic Interest which would mean that the historic value of the house is recognized but the Historic Preservation Commission would not be empowered to review and comment upon changes to the house; 0 it can designate the house a landmark and a landmark alteration permit can be brought to the Commission for the move and placement oa a new site. tv. Conclusion: Staff recmaends the City Council adopt the enclose.1 eso u on designating the G.P. Ledig House, 5702 Amethyst Avenue, a landmark because it meets the criteria in the ordlntnce and because designation will enable the Historic Preservation Commission, which fully understands the need , for the house to be moved, to participate in the preservation of this house at another site. Designation will also enable the owner to use the Historical Building Code Res idly B r City P1 ner BB:AU :mlg Attachments: Resolution Staff Reports Location Map cc: Historic Preservation Comission Mike Oilver, Sr. Civil Engineer 313 { CITY OF RANCHO CUCASI(ONGA MEMORANDUM Dates December 9, 1967 To: Hayor and City Council Prom: Historic Preservation commission By: Paula Pachon, Administrative Assistant Subject: Historical Sienificance of the Ledig House .k •r The commission wishes to reaffirm their belief of the historical significance of the Ledig House located at 5702 Amethyst, Rancho Cucamonga, Califcrnia 91701 (Assossnr's Parcel Number 1062- 071 -06) and their desire for this structure to be moved to a location within the city limits end then designated for city Historical Landmark status. As you aro aware, the Lediq house is an 80- year -old, two story, Victorian style house which retains its original atone Porch and exterior. In addition, nearly all of the windows, doors, and hardware Olt the houses, as well as, the sand finish on the walls and ceilings are original. Historically, this house is one of five naaes built by the Ledig family just before the turn of the century. The Ledig House has been determined by Commission to be both historically and architecturally significant to the city of Rancho Cucamonga and has met the criteria eatablishad to quality for city Historical Landmark designation. With the recant purchase of this property by the City for future right -of -way for Wilson Avenue, the Commission would like to stress their desire that this house he moved and then designated for local landmark status. cc: Historic Preservation commission Brad Buller, City Planner QWy Henderson, Senior Planner - 3ry r - Vaar Vr nruva.nV VvVtuuVlvVn MEMORANDUM _- - Date: November 24, 1987 -FJ To: Beverly 11issen, Assistant Planner Flam: Paula Pachon, Administrative Assistant Subject: Preliminary Report on the Historical /Cultural Significance of the Ledig House Located at 5702 Amethyst, Rancho Cucamonga In response to your memorand= received on November 19th, outlined below is a preliminary report on the historical /cultural significance of the Ledig House located at 5702 Amethyst, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 (Assessor's Parcel Number 106:- 071 -08). The Ledig Nouns i•s an 88- year -old, two story, Victorian style house which retains its original stone porch and exterior. Two additions to the bouse were constructed during the mid - 1900's and 194019. These additions, however, did not appear to affect the integrity of the structure. Nearly all of the windows, doors and hardware on the house, as wall ail, the sand finish on the walls and ceilings are original. Historically, this house is one of five homes built by the Ledig family just before the turn of the century wher Alta Loma was still known as Iamosa. The Ledig's wore cons -dared a prominent local family in the citrus industry. As outlined above the Ledig House has boon considered both historically /culturally and architecturally significant and has been determined by the Historic Preservation Commis9lon to meet the criteria established to qualify far City Historic Landmark designation. As you may be aware, the Cammisaion made a recommendation to this effort to City Council at their April, 1986 meeting. At that tine Council tahled the ^ommission's request that the house be designated a local .Landmark. From reviewing the Commission's file an this structure, it appears that Council's action centered on tLa proposed westerly extension of Wilson Avenue and not the house's historic value. At. the October 21st, 1987 City Council meeting, Council unanimously approved, I believe, the purchase of the house and land located at the above referenced address for future right: -of- way for Wilson Avenue. � l� i Beverly Nissen November 24, 1987 Page 2 e Thu Historic preserlatlon Commission has been informed of your request. for information concerning the historical /cultural significance of this structure and will be discussing this itan at their next regular meeting, Dacember 3, 1987. Should additional information become a7allable, as a i result of the Commission's discussion of this s forwarded tem, I will make sure that it i to your attention. Zf hope that be fob's r`- .iminary report will be helpful to you. contact a °ny further assistance please tasl free to me extension 420. cc: Historic Preservation commission Brad Huller, city Planner 4, J�W y,r . i� 7 CA V., ir Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN STAFF REPORT 1 0 Dates April 14, im is City Council arw City Xanssaer Freer Bill- Holley, Community S,"jc,, Director uS, Subjccts Historic Preservation commission Recommendation Eta Regarding the Ledig House, 5702 Anthys,:. Agenda Item 7-B The Historic preservation Commission in --acce nding that Council designate the LediS Houser 5702 Amethyst Street, a Ci— HifltOzic Lardmark. The I Commission has reviewed the bistoric significance of the house and ,has determined that it meats the criteria eatablisbed to qualify !or such designation. As additional informations the house is located directly in the pith of the Proposed westerly extension Of Wilson Avenue. Should the I-auso be declared A HimtoriC Landmark, the Cost Of relocating the house at such time that wileun Is extended would, Woes: likely, be expected to be borne by the City. PW- KS oYeO p 1'.tso S fi�Btl °¢ 'tS CAt' NEOSejT, sso'S4T S� "O Lt °int c.° �QttQ e,G¢ °L��,� �SSGOTto° on9•' t Sn9 O¢ ,•iic�Kt i 'C ¢i ce° ae °e cS2S M� p,Te,�Og¢s,.cpO o gsn� Lc 4`i °o �Soot` °1 e M e• d` 4 g'IORi° FO ° yfS1 °Scy °te Y.p° Sop spL 4 at SS9 TSOt'GSOS of °pG°dp4 a ° °�e•c``cpi 1 e� S9 GS'n S °dpeper° c °t�iaL4�Dt!° °t a �.a oterY ° a cpa 4. 0S `re aepc ` °•e ° t° $ pL cr c t 1.1 ones °sa° oa at ec ° °i`dii on raScY' of '0' ar^S eta" en° %a -vc a .t- to � rS eopmS of crK. cr° °ScY o¢ce ^ea'N e ' c ei9 Jd° SiD Sap pi° �i of rrb °`Pisa N Eaj° ray a �¢°S `�° a V1,66 ,c iS4s. °�iSa y °. cY Oop"cy1 aiq N ps j.00 ot `kec Ve•ci9�aeiSnn ° NHS NS °e i� °ce ° °S� rY cr° c cr °tos a ppsJ °tts•eaiS pvo �o DSO Dap °S n Jo 12 pSOto 0° cesoSe pf � eA easpe° G,ycY vvo N ca ai SS as as asi u�i sS 6 Spop°� "A° ii t 8SS¢V > >toipSe, tS4aaoe icsate ipa crie i 1 X90 et i a ° AS S recd "'OA p4a, °op et1re° pesos eap °i4 of Sepero cp 't c y90 is L 0p a coi cS T9 10011- -AY SS4se'`i'j° G sic t OmiK•¢T55�, �� 3ettic'� Xy °q d.4 � AtCS QiK A '1stet. n e oei1Y T• T S° RESCLUTIONINO. R6— dti, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE- lr � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALZFORNIAy: •�„� RECOGRZZING THE LEDIG HOMESTEAD, LOCATED 4 AT 5702 AMETHYST STREZ':, AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CM OF RANCHO • „1�.0 CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS - y „ A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARE. :($ „ro WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cnit(oznia, y has adopted Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho CucazCage, Municipal Coda ra Lting to historic preservations and ll% WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation CcamiDalon has :? investigated the historic eignifieenre of the Lediq Homentead and has hold '(� public hearings Concerning this Site in accordance With Chapter 2.24 of the _ Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historic preservation, and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Comiasion hae found ­ the Ledig Homestead �o be a significant historic featurn of the City, and tbereby i =w� recommends it for designation as a City Historic Landmark. e y NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of ' Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follws, 1 The City Council finds and determines that the Ledig Homestead, located at 5702 Amethyst, has met the criteria established for designation us a City Historic Landmark, and thftrefore, and with the racoamendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, danignates this Site as a City Historic _ Landmark. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. Anss r NOES, ABSEATI ATTEST, ee,erly A. Authelot, City Clerx 3/&' u Jeffrey King, Mayor .�.w yYY'_i. �yfy °MR .a e' i.. Si�Y•AFiTx�.7<`'�t.)','vi �,.. � {.e���wu'�V'.:�Yq �:CC -.J`vai.J��n^%W:�yI. !i. L) .z Cityiof.8anobo Qicam^nyar` � }•,;.+ �'i Ali.- yy PIICatlon for HIST0RIC - ` Y �'• FOIST -OF INTERESTIDE HISTORIC FOIST- OF INTEREST DESIGNATION ° +r a, r Histor3a Landmark Historic Point of Interest IDENTIPICATIOE I. Contemn Race: 3. Historic H8a1e, if known tee_ f_ a Ho.p Lind 5 3. Street or Rural Addromet_ %7n7 enetn..e et Cftyi_ nit. ,nee Z1Dt 917(11 Conntyt S. eernodino Assessor-* parcel No. 1062- Djy-gp__ ZpGas 91701 Legal Descriptions Parcel I - map 4433 - book AO Psoe 67 4. present Owner, if knowat J.N. Chaste Address: 3702 Amethyst CSty,Alta Loea Zipt 91701 Ownership Sat public private D. present Dag ter(rste Re•tdeane Original Hset_ same Other put names un known ntherye• DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the present h eical a oarance of the alto or structure amt describe any a or a terat mow run Its original condition t_f_atn vt t f ,n r-9fdance wl ogicInnt stonp north and exterior Rear kitchen expanded and bath added by Col. Herr In Nor 19A7. Orlalnal front room typenoed noorg,. 1933 All Windows/doors and hardware are orieinel /taw exceotlom n.f o(nal sand fln)ch wells and Collin G3 7 Location sketch sap (draw a label 8. Approxlmuto property size, site and surrounding atreets, Lot BSZa (10 feet) roads, and Prominent IaAdmarks)t Frontage. e9+ Depth 7n•. or approx. aureaga B Conditions (check one) a. Excellent_ b. food_Z a. Fair__ d. Deterlorated_� e. No longer In_oxfatence_ 30. Is the features a. Altered?_ k b. Unaltered? X 3702 Asetnys 11. Surroundiagat (check =re than ' one if accessary) A. Open land , b Renidentlal It a. Scattered buildfoge__ r d. Densely built -up_ 1 Kitchen /bath -I9A7. % 2 Front Room Extonsion *, 1933 (approx ) 3. ariptnsl Name 12. Throats to Sitet � r a.': Rose known_ b. Private development �• pmectyt_ C Zosing__ , • d. Public Works Protest_ e. Vaddall I. Other ;j„ GGLn shows street t,tr 13. Dates of enclosed yhotograph(a )per. 1985 [n or house, 1 T+ NOTE: The followiCE (Items 1{ -18) are for structures only, r- ?•- le Primary exterior building material& a. stone_ b. Brick c Stucco_ d. Adobe -_ e. Vood X f. Other, 18. Is the Structure& a On its original site? yes b. Moved? C. Unknown?_ 18. Year of Initial Construction: 1199 (elu ted) This Data Se& a. Factual b. Estimated X 17 Architeat (if known )I_Lnd1V- 18. Rullder (it known )s Ledld (assumed) 19. Related Featured a Bard__ b. Carriage house c Outhouse d. Sbed(a) e. Formal Oardea(s) f Windmill g. Watertover /taukkouse It. Other I. None SIGNIFICANCE • 20. Briefly state hietarical amd /cr architectural importance (loclude dater, events, and persons associated with the site when known): _apparently one of � 112.ei built Or the • edin family - e the turn of the century Later sold (date not obtained) to Col _ Harr who resided here until the late 60's as beat I can tell. Thess dates could be wrong by a small margin. Sold to Dal %tonebreker until Nov 1983 when sold to Jill 6 Htchael Choate 21 Mats tbcM of the historic resource: (Check only one): a Architecture b. Arts I Leisure C Economic /Iodustrlal d. Government a Exploration /Settlement x f. Military__ -- - g. Religion b. Social /Education 22 Sours aa& List books, documents, surveys, pperaonal Sute"tews, and tbetr detest San Bernadine County B 15d! o De t "The Alta Loma Book" 23. Date farm prepared Feb 6. 1986 By (name):Jfll a ulrna.l imps&. Addresat3]o7 jisub..t 9t City:Alt. :o..a ZIP191701 Phonet(714) 980 -2321 - _ ._ Organization: owner 3 ao 1 ;r 5 as Looking jezmix View Page_ of Page_ LJH3 MANZANITA I CITY OF R,3a CUCVvIONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMUISSION rMlf THE _G P• L r�16- }}ouse EXHIBFT, ALE, 3c)a r t RESOLUTION NO. $ O - 47)R A RESOLUTION ( •Tf COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO DIGO ON4TIVNTMEOLEHOUSE LOCATED AT S702THYSAEENUEAS AIAHM M advertisedHpubblic hearingttotconsidervallocacCntssonnthesphroposed Landmark Designation and issued Resolution No. iQ- recommending to this City Council that said Landmark Designation be approve3.,('.11 WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. C. Neighborhood and Geog•aphic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community. (Ord. 70 S9, 1979). a NOW. THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: Parcel SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor er - 071 -08. SECTION II: The proposed landmark meets the following criteria establishe n ap er 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Caltural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, style, and way of life. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but 's now rare. 3. The propose( landmark was connected with an important local personality, B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials arc beautiful or unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geog•aphic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community. (Ord. 70 S9, 1979). a I CITY_ COUNCIL' RESOLUTION N0:' - .. - �xYNtom ^# RE: , HLO OF-THE.LEDIG HOUSE' - i4,«',j3 August 3 1988'1 -.s Pnge 2 SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEpA (Article 19, Sect on SECTION IV: Based on the'umstantial evidence received and reviewed by J this ouuncl`Fand based on t.'e findings set forth above, NON, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council , does hereby approve designation of the G.P. Ledig House as a landmark. w 11�--r z. i i • `F .. .<•.a1ih.L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner By: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A Pro osal to Designate The Fisher House 7165 Etiwanda venue, nc o ucamonga, as a an r . I. Recommendation: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends .na a ouncil designate the Fisher House a landmark because it has both historical and architectural value and meets the criteria established in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. In addition, the historical survey team's findings were that the house has State and National Register potential. II. Background; A. Current status: This item was continued from the meeting of June IS, 1988. The owner and his family object to designation of this property because they do not wish to be encumbered with the designation if they desire to remove the house and offer the land for sale. The Historic Preservation Commission finds that the house not only meets the criteria in the ordinance, but is a particularly important structure. They expressed the opinion that if the house must be moved, that it be moved to a more suitable spot on the site or at least remain close to its current location. If the house is designated a landmark, the moving or demolition• - - would be subject to review and approval by the Commission. The owners do not wish to undergo this review. B. Incentives: The City Council requested that staff look into the matter of incentives that the City can offer to owners to make landmark designation more attractive. The general topic of incentives is discussed to a separate staff report. Incentives available to help preserve the Fisher House incluae the provisions for 'notable structures' in the Etiwonda Specific Plan that enable nonconformities to be treated as conforming; the exclusion of these notable structures in residential density calculations which allows the structure to -305- 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT THE FISHER HOUSE August 3, ISM Page 2 be an extra unit; the conversion of houses to non - residential uses with a Conditional Use Permit, and entitlement, if it is a landmark, to use the Historical Building Code. If the house is qualified for listing on the National Register and were to be used as a rental or office or other depreciable use, and were to undergo substantial, certified rehabilitation, it could quality for a tax credit equal to 20 percent of rehabilitation costs. C. Site Plans: The City Council also requested to look at a site plan that shows the house in relationship to tte site. Attached to th!3 Staff Report are alternative layouts developed by staff. Two schemes assuage a single family restdential development, the other two assume a mixed use development with the Fisher House being adaptively reused. One of each leaves the house as it sits and the other shows the i:ouse located elsewhere on the site. There appears to be several ways to develop this property that would include preservation of the Fisher House. III. Alternatives: The City Council's alternatives are: 1.) to accept the Historic Preservation Commiss*ion's recommendation and designate the Fisher House a landmark; 2 ) to deny the designation even though it meets the criteria in the ordinance; 3.) to designate the Fisher House as a point of historic interest which recognizes the historical value of the house but does not require Historic Preservation Commission review of changes; 4 ) to continue the item. Iv. Additional Rationale for Designation: A. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that designation of landmarks benefits all citizens and improves the quality of life, and that designation is legitimate as long as an owner is able to make a reasonable return on his investment. Designation of the Fisher House would not prevent use of the property or reasonable return on investment; it would help protect the house from inappropriate alterations and make it eligible to use the Historical Building Code. 3a� : ••� v'..A�:r:1��5'�+�: ='y V= nikF?+ry"tcY"'++-r .. ',YI��'r�Y °r'i.�..Tr '°- i�sYiy: t`�,`u; CITY COUNCIL''STAFF•REPORT THE FISHER. HOUSE •1" ' 'August 3, 1988 Pago -3 ' B. development at a proposed shopping center and condominium Its way through the planning process, ss, the Bvaluefof thisaland may be increasing and the likelihood of development in the near future would be greater. Keeping the heritage of the Etiwanda area' of Rancho Cucamonga alive depends on retention of as much of the original htstorical fabric as possible and on using the historic buildings as a touchstone for near development. Without inclusion of authentic, original buildings in the development of Etiwanda, the turn- of -the- century theme will bx artificial arul not in keeping with the goals and policies of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Designation of the Fisher House will help to keep the character of this unique coawnity. C. The Etiwands Specific Plan calls for the protection and enhancement of the visual. and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and its surroundings. Designation of the Fisher House is consistent with this purpose. V. Action Requested: Staff requests that the City Council accept the recowae" rraat oi-n of the Historic Preservation Commission and designate the Fisher House as a landmark. lly c er Cne r BB:AB :mlg Attachments: Staff Reports Resolution - Alternative Site Plans a ry�' 4 ^f �R 'S',*3; Clri OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASKED Kouse KTIWA"A RiN.W41 SUMN ROUSE 71116 m O Y O c"unc" CHAFF&T - CIAPICIA HOUIC "Im. nust BASELINE ROAD —1 F- m I CONCEWTUAL DRAWINGS .1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,; FISMIM HOUSE ITIWANVA PAILWAT %7AYW0 0007a 7110 1 ROAD F9- W CONCIMAL CaAWWas O at a"WAROA CONORRUATIONAk CHURCH FI.SH.. ..... ER HOUSE CHAFFIV • OARCU HOUSE ROAD F9- W CONCIMAL CaAWWas Nown E:l ITSWAkDA CCHURKQAMXAL CHUACH CHAFF9Vl QGARCU kOUIR CI CITY OF'RANCHOMCAMQNGM� F - -txt ETIMWA"A NP;LWAT OTAMN SOMMERS MAGELINK ROAD ---1 F- 3,36 '1 E MIMALCRAWROS Z. J1 I Q7di4if13 iw "OUSE 7119 E3 O LM BASELINE ROAD CITY OF RANCHO (;UUAMVV%iA--' .9"WANDA, 6 JULWAT $TAM* Ron A CONCEPTUAL DRAWA104 ;R-MIT�-m--mm --------- A EJ "IWANDA CONGRIGAMMAL • CHURCN C,Wny - "Ilel& "Oust O LM BASELINE ROAD CITY OF RANCHO (;UUAMVV%iA--' .9"WANDA, 6 JULWAT $TAM* Ron A CONCEPTUAL DRAWA104 ;R-MIT�-m--mm --------- A LQ VIAFFET - GARCM 110VIR CITY OF RANCHO CUM romm HUM KTIWAMA MAWWAT STLZIOX -rLL BASELINE ROAD --1 I fi Aw I CONCKMALtRAWYNIS I -'- I Routs Ti in R"WANVA CONG119"IMMAL, CHURCH LQ VIAFFET - GARCM 110VIR CITY OF RANCHO CUM romm HUM KTIWAMA MAWWAT STLZIOX -rLL BASELINE ROAD --1 I fi Aw I CONCKMALtRAWYNIS I -'- I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO, Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner ABJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE FISHER HOUSE, 7165 ETINANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AS A LANDKARK I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends at a uncil designate 7165 Ettwanda Avenue a landmark. II. BACKGROUND: This house, located across Ettwanda Avenue from the a aY- rc1a House, is a queen Anne Victorian -style structure built 1n IB92. Fran 1907 to 1930 the switchboard of The Home Telephone Company, a mutual cooperative company owned by Etiwanda citizens, was located in this house and operated by Mrs. Florence Ftsher and her daughter, Nellie. The house is significant because Of its architecture, its age, and its historical role in the development of Etiwanda. The property is located in the and the Etiwanda Avenue Owe Specific Plan area. The Plan help foster preservation of "no converted to various co®ere Conditional Use Permit on thi addition, the Plan also permit "bonus" for residential develo Thes" structures are not inclu not iedree the number of new & vmvnity Services Overlay District kY District within the Etiwanda rovides substantial incentives to ble" structures; e.g., they may be and professional uses with a Portion of Etiwanda Avenue. To notable structures to serve as a ents on lots of 1 acre or more. d in density calculations and do lings Permitted. Mr. Robert Flocker, owner of this house as well as several adjacent lots, is opposed to designation. Mr. Flocker is planning to sell the house and have it relocated possibly outside the City. Although landmark status would not necessarily prevent removal, the Historic Preservation Commission would review relocation plans. tlr. Flocker does not wish to be sub .4ect to such review. He does not want to demolish the house, but he does want to clear the land and sell it for development. He has expressed his opposition in writing as well as orally fa copy of applicable correspondence is attached for reference). 333 t, a, aDVQ,; 111CRlOy. Me 5310n re1L =41, .V nou important enough sb.wsrrant designation. They thought it,shc kept near other i�portant historic structures in :tiwanda.•, Reber Ifocse must be,moyed, they would prefer that it be rel close to its current location. kesp filly suD ted r Bul r City nner BB:AB.vc X33 � 'i { i AYES: CCN1fISSIONERS: COOP ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT floes: COkNISS7rurme• nur ASSENT: CODERS: S .Aft HASKVITZ -- carried •• *e *** D. HISTORICC LANDMARK DESIGHATtnu Or 7165 ETINANDA AVENUE PwtCHO UlWanda Avenue, a Historic Landma kk - 227-131-23. o -fio' Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public he4 ;ing. Robert expressed his Flocker Opposition to the designation1.onuCopiese Ofihisr written objections were distributed to the Comission. Commissioner Banks stated that one of Mr. Flocker's main concerns is that the landmark status would prevent moving, which is not the case. She stated he would have to come before the Commission with an Alteration Permit. She stated that the house is of great significance, that across the street from the house are two landmarks and there are two more to the north and that it is a great advantage to the City to have so many landmarks close together. She stated that if the owner decides to move it that it will stay close by and maybe the property could be converted to commercial use. Lary Henderson„ Senior Planner, questioned if Mr. Flocker was planning tc 9:11 the property and the structure. Mr. Flocker stated that not at this time. ale stated he feels the house Is in the mlhile of the four acres and in the way of being able to 'evelop the property. He stated that he has ben, trying to sill tho house for some time and has had two offers. Larry Henderson questioned if the two offers had expressed any idea as to what purpose or location. Mr. Flocker stated that it was for residential use and they had desired keeping it to Etiwands. Larry Henderson questioned If the structure was designated, would it bring a better selling price Mr Flocker stated that he did not see hew it would, but would place more restrictions on the property. He stated that it should be up to the property owner to have their property or structure designated. HPC MINUTES -4- 3 3 :5-- MAY S, 1983 f} 1.1Y�• Y P M' h i da Larry Henderson explained the procedure for designation and moving the structure. i Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Banks stated that she felt the economic value as a commercial use would be great if it was to remain at the site. Commissioner Arner moved to recommend to City Council the approval of the Historic Landmark Designation of 7165 Etiwanda Avenue. Commissioner Banks seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, HASKYITZ -- carried r r + + } r E. HISTORIC LANDMARK JESIGNATIOI OF 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE RANCHO es e man venue, arHistorlc oandma R a APil:e 202-061-12. � Arlene Banks presented the staff re ort. Chairman Schmidt opened the ppu 1c hearing. Hearing none, Chairman S,haidt closed the public hear in . Commissioner ei111n9s verified a slgnlficance of the house. Commissioner Billings coved recommend to City Council the approval of Historic Landmark Designati of 6797 Hellman Avenue, excluding the out buildings. Commissioner ner seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following v te: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BILLIRGS, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, SCHMIDT NOES, COMM13SI0NE NONE ABSENT: C"ISSIONE STAMM. RMYITZ -- carried } f + * f } 7 HPC NINUrS -5- 334 MAY S. 1988 f A 0 f' t. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May S. 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Sinks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 7165 ETIHAfDA AYRNE RAIIClfO C'EMOW propose o designate e Fisher use, TE wa-lvenue, a Historic Landmark - APH: 227 - 131 -23. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: That the Historic Preservation Commission recommend o the City Council adoption of a Resolution designating the Fisher House, 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, a Historic Landmark. B. Location: The house is on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, nor -o norUF—oT Base Line Road, south of the Pacific Electric tracks and across the street from the Chaffey -Garcia House. C. Site Land Uses - Zoning - General Plan Designation: The site C. Is an unoccupied, boarded up. sVn_9Te_­faWTy­r—e­sTdence. The zoning is determined by the Ettwanda Specific Plan. It 1s in the Lox - Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). The General Plan also designates It as Low - Medium Density. The Ettwanda Specific Plan includes the property in the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District and the Coamunity Service Overlay District. - conrno - Plan Map and also on the General Plan Map. It is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District and the Commuanity Service Overlay District. South - Vacant (with a new chain -link fence); Designated Low - Hedium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) on the Etiwanda Specific Plan and on the General Plan. East - Vacant; Same designation as above. The property to the east is not within the Etiwanda Avonua Overlay District or the Cosmunity Service Overlay District. 3 37 HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 7165 ETIWAROA AVE. May 5, 1988 Page 2 Hest - The site is directly across the street from the Chaffey -Garcia House which is on land designated `L`, Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Planned Community Specific Plan. However, the Chaffey Garcia House is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District and the Community Service Overlay District. E. Overt Districts Within the Etiwanda S ectfic Plan: The s er lol.use is w n e van a venue er ay lstrtct and the Community Service Overlay District. 1. The Etiwanda Specific Plan contains provisions tailored to the Etiwanda area. These provisions replace City- wide regulations. They were adopted to take into account Etiwanda's special character, while allowing a reasonable level of development. Throughout the Plan, there are references to historical features such as period architecture, windbreaks and tree lined streets, and rock curbs. The Plan encourages historic preservation. 2. The purpose of the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District is to protect and enhance the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and its Immediate surroundings. Minimum setbacks are 25 feet with a 30 foot average setback. Structures facing Etiwanda Avenue must be at least 25 feet apart. Styles are encouraged to be traditional and field stone used as major design element. A single family appearance is to be maintained and landscaping is to be consistent with the streetscape theme contained in the Plan. 3. The Community Service Overlay District was formed to provide opportunities for limited or specialized, lw- imoact commercial and quasi- comercial services. Its purposes are to provide a focal point in the heart of the community that reinforces a sense of comunity identity and to encourage perpe3aation of features that are tied to Etiwanda's heritage. 44th a Conditional Use Permit and provisions that assure no adverse impacts and enhancement of the visual and historical character of Etiwanda, professional offices, restaurants, beauty shops, farmers' markets and similar uses could be permitted, as well as schools, churches, community buildings and the like. 339 HPC STAFF REPORT ? RE: 7165 ETIWANDA AVE. May S. 1988 t Page 3 4 n F. Description: The Historic Resources Inventory farm describes r as fol owe;as Spindle -work Queen Anne. The description reads 'An irregular shaped single story structure of wood construction with combination of hipped and front and side gables. Roof has composite shingles. Eaves are enclosed. Gable ends have shingle treatment and detailed verge boards. Siding is flush boards. An integral porch is located on the front with lattice work frieze suspended under porch ceiling, turned porch supports and spindle -work it the balustrade. Porches are of wood. There are similar porches located at the rear of the structure on both the north and south sides. Foundation material is wcod. Doors and windows are unknown, due to being boarded. The structure is located on a large, vacant lot of 10 acres. A barn of similar structure was located at the rear of this structure, however, it has collapsed. There are two large trees located to the front of the house, between the dirt driveways. A row of trees lines the street in front of this structure. - The large trees in front of the house appear to be Magnolias, and a tall Washington Fan Palo stands closer to the street. Silk oaks line the edge of the property near the stone curbs. II. ANALYSIS• A. Back round - General: This house was selected from the list if po an a an arcs dentified in the 1987 survey. B. Reasons for Designation: This house 1s significant because of Its age an s c ran -era Queen Anne architecture. It is estimated to have been built to 1895. Etiwanda The First 100 Years gives an 1892 date. It is also $ gn can ecause was the location of the switchboard for the Home Telephone Company whicn was organized in June of 1507 and arced by the people of Etiwanda. The switchboard was staffed by Mrs. Florence Fisher and her daughter Nellie. The switchboard was moved and mechanized in 1930. C. Issues• This house is unoccupied and boarded up. Designation ceu perhaps help along the process of rehabilitation and reoccupuation. The City's Development Code allows landmark residences to be used for non - residential purposes with a Conditional Use Permit, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan also 337 HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 7165 ETINANDA AVE. Hay S. 1988 Page 4 • -i 777 hroever. for alternative uses. Funds for rehabilitation, however, are scarc e. If the building is eligible for the National Register of If Places and 1f it were to be converted substantial cawuercial use or rental residential use and needs Income tax credit ifora� eon. the reit might atio^alify for a 20; evaoableil {or that future California Bond fundsTcouldIs also has an interestrotne (such asca local easement). n age cy hand, rehabilitation for owner - occupancy could take place as Owns or development on in the area increases. Respectful rehabilitation that is in harmony with the Victorian architecture of the house would help set the tone for this stretch of Etiwanda Avenue, The rehabilitation of the Cr this devaln 9 use thIsaareaoin accord with thervisionueemp diedtinnthe Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Fisher house is worthy of recognition as a landmark and should be encouraged to follow to the steps of the ChaffpJ Garcia House and be reclaimed. D. Environmental Assessment; Designation of a landmark 1s exempt irom� requ remen s title 19. Section 15308), iII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Criteria selected from the Ordinance that are app ca e o e Sher House are as follows: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1• The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period and style, Z' The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which Is now rare. 3, The Proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4' The Proposed landmark business. is connected with a (historic) 8• Historical Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1 The overall effect of landmark 1s beautiful, the design of the proposed C• Neighborhood and Geographic Setting 1• The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 3 �d t k; :r 'Y sA�+ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 7165 ETINANDA AVE. May S. 1988 Page 5 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the ce munity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e �a_ y e°orrtt newspaper and notices have been sent to the owner and comers within 300 feet. A message was left on the owner's answering tape informing him of the upcoming hearing. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Mma ss on recommend to the City Council that they adopt a Resolution designating the Fisher House a landmark because it meets the criteria established in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Such designation is also in conformity with policies of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Respectfully 'subQaltted, x� 0 "„evvf'°"„ Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:ko Attachments 3 7! `- I r•m rnRr _ w AM C i 4 � j Notable Structures II 6858 (Address) ♦ Chaffey/Garcla House • to be relocated mss. 10OT+a+am aa7^ Foothill blvd. S.P. F`Shor 4ous,, J tFtia f igu�e NOTABLE 5 -43 ' STRUCTURES VIC)" 1 t Cucamonga - v M Ot9IGRATLOR Or INTER= ]MIGRATION p r s'tt= gistoric Lantanrk —X— Historic Point of incest t < =ton IM"IFICATICN 1. Cots•on,Rwt � 9. i glRCtle gar, if bowel r/fbr woufa or 1lorton -wlsMr Nouse k `y' J. Street or Rural Addrsset_7165 Etftwnda Avenue Clty1_Bincho fucaitnaa five 91739 Coestyi Stn Bernardino •• seseewr'a Parcel No. 277 - 1]1.73 'foset Etlr- Sp. Ple tip , Legal Descriptions_Etfraada relenv Lends Lot If BIk K t 4. Present Omer, if boo t__Ralert _ ftoc:ar AdlreNl 6it6 Toou I•' Cityl atechn 2 manna Pipe' 91701 Ownership Set nblio ° "'• t, t Pr3rat—i = - O. Proust Uses original DNt LNIO Family Residence .- Other put uess SIn910 Paef1Y Residence S. privily describe the present phyaleel aeeearaace of taw site or stroete -e and describe may Lyon alter: ou ton its o *igioal e0ndltloat S. State Hlstorte RI es lnrtntory form) This Sot dlwo k Quinn Anne rlttorlan Muse his a comp ea Ppi MS r urns n mi and a lattice frlele and wood board std) a It s boarded up. 7. Location Sketch sap (draw A label Site and surrounding struts, roads, and prom ent Iu4earks)t 3 X13 S. Approximate property meet Lot Rise (in feet) Trootage Depth or approx. acresga p. Conditions (t:heck cow) A. Excellent -•b. Good_ e. Tafri-.d. Deteriorated e. No longer In existence 10. Is the features a. Altmrad_ )_ Is. Unaltered? Annnnn (y 31. Surmundingu (check core th 04e if necessary) a. open land A b. Residential I r C. Scattered buildings__; d. Densely built -up__ e. Commercial s f Industrial 9 Other__'Q 19. Threats to 91bt ' a. None had" __ b. Private developeeut 1 0. Zoafng— d. Public Works Praleot__ e. yloda.aaa I t. Other 13. Bates Of taolased photograph(&) 19a7 and 19&T ••� NMI The following (ltaty It -ls) are for utruoturfs only. it. primary eat"101' building materials a atone_, b. arfck� kh {1 a. stucco _ d. Adobe_ e, Wood x I. Other 19. Is the Structures a. on its original of s x b. Movedit a. Unseat'? ! 19• year of Initial Coast gallons 1995 ` YLis tAU lu a. Factual b. Ltinated . ` 17. Architect (11 Waote), IS, guilder (if known), 19. Related Features$ a. Sara b. Caring. house a. Outhouse d. abed(.) e. yorm'1 Gardaa(s) I. Windmill— g• tntertOWdr /talkhouu _ h. Other._trcn I. None 91GNrrreatrcF 20. Briefly state historical cad /or orahitecturnl lmportatae (include date,, mots, and peranns associated with time site when known, )t JSea State Fore) I'm Teltuhont COmanY Switchboard located ham frog _ 1907 to 1930. Switchboard sue run by Florence Fisher and her daughter, Relile. Zl. Naio theme of the blatorlo resources xidSRty[7aaigt7arss01t a. Arcbitecture__L— b. Artr ► Leisure o. Eeodomlc /Sadustrial x d. Governmeat e. Esploratioo /9ettlemeat t. Nllitary 9. Religion b, Social /Education ZZ. Sourcva I Llet baoke. documents, surveys. and their detest State ktatortc Re V t • t �on, oa 1 Interviews, Etl d _TM rt.S —fit o0 yam. 29. Data tares prepared xartl. 1998 BY (nams)s Arlan, Bants Address, Cityt Zips —Z PAneet Organization, y� _('tlY Or Rancho C •wne! -�,. r Swu of Oaabrms . The Ramwal Ao Siff. No. 17 In ' oT DEPARTMENT OF -ARKS AND RECREATION HA95_HAER_Lcc_SHLNo_NRStatua_ UTM. A 11- 451870- 3776775 C HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY I D 0 IDENTIFICATION Fisher House 1 Common name. Z. Historic name: Fisher House 3. Street or rural address: 7165 Etiwanda Avenue Ciro Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. Zip 91739 County San Bernardino a Perot number: 0227 - 131 -23 S. Present Owner: pokert f F1oCker Aejrau: 6226 Tooaz City Rancho Cucamonga. _Calif, Zip 91701 Owriarthip in Public Private E B. Present Use: RncidAnce Originalusa: Residence DESCRIPTION 7a. ArDjtKruraatyle: Spindlework Queen Anne 71b. 8nefly desuibe Ne PreuntphYsrWIPpNrancf of the use or struaun aM descnbo any major sturations from iu original condition: An irregular shaped single story structure of wood construction with combination of hipped and front and side gables Roof has composite shingles Eaves are enclosed Gable ends have shingle treatment and detailed verge boards Siding is flush boards An integral porch is located on the front with latice work frieze suspended under porch ceiling, turned porch supports and spindle - work in the balustrade Porches are of woud There are similar porches located at the rear of the structure on both the north and south sides Foundation material is wood Doors and windows are unknown, due to being toarded The structure is located on a large, vacant lot of 10 zcres A barn of similar structure was located at the rear of this structure, however, it has collapsed There are two large trees located to the front of the house, between the dirt driveways A row of trees lines the street in front of this structure Curb in this area is original stone. CPR 5231Rev. 111851 8. Conumcd ,da Eaumated Fermat- 9 Architect - Unknown 10. Bwidsr Unkncwn 11. APProK•propemy wag lin lead Frontage-- Depth— or appnna auuve 10 12 Oate(s) of enclosed PhotograRbis) July 1987 v w n r 13. Ccnditlan: excellent ._Good__ Fat, _ 041adaratad % Na longer In aurco¢s� N. Altcndons: _Removal of surroundinn ra ove: boarding of structure iB. Swrourwingt: (Chvk man thin one if necn uy) Open j nd X $aarcuad 6.flduga,�0anuy eulltvp _ RnidanNd X IrWwtrlal x Carmnrdal__ONer: 16 ThnaNtaute: Nana krwwn�hiraudmlotnarht,,,X_ Zonln l__ Vandelisrrt__ Public Works project Odor: 17. It the ctructura: On its Mteinal site ? .may Morel UnknawnT 16 Relate faah.rer: W k SIGNIFICANCE 1& Briefly state historical cad /or artnitecogo knpornnca Nndude date, events, and persons 9=date with the eltoj Location of the switchboard for the Home Telephone Co, a put stock co, owned by the people of Etiwanda and orgainzed on 612/07. The Switchboard was ewommaneda by Frs. Florence Fisher and her daughter Nellie. The switchboard was moved and mechanized in 1930. 20. Main Name of the nismrk rooum: (If more than one 6 cracked. number In order of Ur.portanae.) Architecture Arta la Lelwn Ecunomk/IndusMel �Eaplontkwh/Settlrrharht Govanmam Military Religion SodellEducaUon Locations] sketch map Idn wrtoundiny strets, roes, I v cad label sits and and prominent landmarksj: T.F. 1%NPpT NORTH T„ �IyMk7bA 21. Sources (List books, documnp, nwwrs h.rsanel Imerwrwe � and wait date). v A field Guide to American Hoses', �r•SBL,J L^� Virginia and Lee McAlester 22. Date fa m prepared September 29. 1907 By(narne) Lynn rerr Organization ' Address- City ap Phone: 3 116 RESOLDTICH h0. 88-406 A RESI2, A. OP IRA CITE 0Dum L OP THE CITE OP RANCHO DUSZ AA, CALIYORNIA. APFRCvIN3 TO DESICHATE SR WISHER S A LOCATED AT 7165 ETIWjM APELUE. RANCHO GGlOfCA, AS A RISTORIC LAND.yAgR cdvertised� � the Hlatoric Preeetvatlon C°amieoion, bad held Landmark and Public hearing to consider all mmmenta on the a duly Issued Resolution 1b. 88-07 PrOP°aed Historic Historic P�REASP the City Gcancii has received and revieved all is Cmsmisalon regarding said Historic Lsndma pat from the S8C a 1, The rk llaeignaticn. hereby cakes the followin �ncbo C1C°0O °g° Historic Preaesoation e findings, Commission A. Hiatorical and Cultural Significance, 1• histori�eed Period and I. particularly representative of an petiod end style. 2. The proposed landmark is an essmple of a type of building which Is now rare. B. C. 3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4, no proposed landmark is connected with a (historic) business. Historical Architectural and Engineering Significance, 1• The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark I. beantiful. Ikigbborbood and Geographic Setting, 1• The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighlorhood. 2' The proposed landmark in its location represents established and familiar visual feu tote location the e It" SECTION 2, Designation o! • landmark is ezwpt from ocnunity. Section. 15308 CE<!A (Article 19, u t3y� ' Esao:ution•EO.,e8 -;06 Page 2 y• NOR, IBERRMOR. BE IT RESOLVED that tLe Rancho Cuc mrmga City Council does berebp approve 3e limber Rome u a 9istotie Landmark. i Y Y r -'v .'4 yK A tiiH� I 11 IN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner MECT: TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE UPDATE I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review the propose cy revisions to the Tree Preservation Ordinance to allow stafpo f to prepare a formal Ordinance amendment. II. DISCUSSION: In response to Council discussion an May 18, 1988, 57f- prepared a summary of the varicus policies as they could be applied to revisions to the current Tree Preservation Ordinance. The areas of concern expressed by the Council are discussed below, including the present Ordinance requirement and proposed revisions to the Ordinance. A. Existing Blue Cum Windrows in New Development Projects: Current Polic : In new development projects, existing windrows are exam ne with regard to health and general location with respect to project design. Whenever appropriate and feasible, the trees are preserved. In the case of disease or conflict with public improvements or other site design constraints, they are replaced with Spotted Gum Eucalyptus to re- establish the windrow grid pattern in more appropriate locations elsewhere in the project. Proposed Policy: All Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees should be ._ rep ace w potted Gums or other species, unless they can be protected within a public right- of -rwy or other public easement. The replacement pattern should re- establish the original windrow grid pattern. This policy would allow replacement of the Blue Gum Eucalyptus in most new development projects. The replacement would occur in the mos: appropriate locations on and off -site, but the replacement specie: is far more suited to a residential environment without U.e messy characteristics of the older Blue Gums. Under certain circumstances, the Blue Gum could be preserved within areas of public right -of -way (such as Community Trails) if it was determined that such preservation would be a benefit to the area and the condition of the trees would warrant preservation. 3W CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: TREE PREMYATION ORD. UPDATE July 20, 1988 Page 2 B. Removal of Blue Guns Within Private Yard Areas: Current Po1I%: In exifting development, tree removal is aetenmir Daseed an condition of the trees in question and the effect of the removal on the area, with emphasis on preservation. Pro osed Polic Give greater flexibility to tree removal would include lot size, character of thed neighborhood Considerations ability to relocate /replace trees elsewhere on the lot. Replacement of t7:0 Blue Gums with more appropriate trees would be encouraged where feasible. The Proposed change in Policy would provide additional considerations when reviewing tree removal within a private Yard area. Tie intent of the revision would be to allow greater flexibility to homeowners in utilizing the areas where windrows have been preserved or itplaced. A Tree Removal Permit would still be required. C. Preservin Blue Gums in Ke Areas: Council may want to T er an op ono prc ery ng ex s ing Blue Gums 1n limited specified locations to continue an established street tree pattern. This policy 1s being used in the Etlwanda Specific Plan area along Etiwanda Avenue, Victoria and other limited locations. Examples of such key areas elsewhere include Archibald near Hillside and Monte Vista near accurately ll k and de defined within the areas co determined heformalaamendmentto the Tree Preservation Ordinance. D. Preservation of Other Herlta a irees: All other heritage actively u ng a m, camore, Pine and others, are y preserved in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Staff recommends that policies with regard to preservation of these other heritage trees not be amended. III. SUMNARY: The intent of this report is to summmarize discussion from VFEWY 16, 1988 City Council meeting, prior to preparing a formal emendnerov to the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Staff would encourage jeny further discussions that could clarify, or add to the Pal es currently under consideration. Rdspe 0cf 3JY su tted, Brad BullersiC, City Planner BB:DM:ko - 3sa -00 O-/ JwN[[ L NAR RNwM wNOR(M V. ARC tiN {RI Rw1 IN D MANION D CRA10 IOt NARINJ JO O[I {L[R NONttR ome CWM CCN}[R CIRCm P o eaI to so t P1A GlI10RNIR ofoii •IOte na•oeol IuvNONt (rI float z: eel• ]ell MEMORANDUM TO: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk /M1 FROM: Andrew V. Arczynski, Assistant City Attorney DATED: July 20, 1988 RE: GTE Sprint, etc. v. County of Alameda, at al. Alameda County Superior Ceurt No. 639382 -3 This correspondence respect to the abovo- c w s aptionedmatter. As You will o recall, in Past years, the City had an obligation to provide notice to the County that it had baen served with lawsuits requesting tax refunds and, specifically, to request the County Counsel's Office to defend such matters. Effective January 1, 1988, the law now provides that the County is to be served with the lawsuits and is presumed to act on behalf of the cities for which it collected taxes. The City may, pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 5148, "opt out" of the litigation insofar as representation by the County Counsel's Office. Stated otherwise, the City does have the choice, in accordance with the provisions of California Revenue and Taxation Code, of defending itself in the litigation as opposed to having the matter defended by the County Counsel's Office on the City's behalf. Our sis of that the city's anal evellof involvementainntheates matter would militate against the City retaining its own counsel to defend the matter. Accordingly, we recommend that the City Council, by minute action, direct your office to correspond with the County Counsel's office evidencing the City of Rancho Cucamonga's intent to continue the representation of the County Counsel's Office in the above - referenced matters. O C course, aliforniaRevenueandnTaxation accordance Cede, representation provisions of thehe City's interests by the Cot•.nty will require that tho City pay its pro -rata share of the costs and expenses of litigation, including attorneys fees. However, based upon the large number „ Memorandum to: Beverly Authelat July 20, 1988 - Page Two Of entities in the County (virtually all) appearing in the y matter, it would appear that the City's exposure to such •' expanses would be particularly'as compared to having ,y independent counsel reprosent the City. For all of the for reasons, we recommend the City Council permit the County CnUnsel's office to defend the matter on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Pleaeo provide the City counoil a copy of this memorandum for its next City Council meeting in order that it may take a position on the matter. AVA:pmm L \173 \MEMOAUTH \R.C. 15E I JJMC1 LMFRMMNI •N= V RRC[TN[RI RAIPM O MAN \ON O C..IO [OR MIRTMA JO O[I \I[R ael� MUM\CR ONC CHIC C[NTtR CIRCIC P O \OR i0 [O OR [n. UUPORNIA 6[[t[•10 \O put seo•oeol T[I[PM OMt MEMORANDUM TO: Beverly Autholot, City clerk a*(__ FROM: Andrew V. Arczynski, Assistant City Attorney DATED: July 25, 1988 RE: Southern Pacific F.JM Lines. Inc. y,_ Board 41 E:rualization. etc.. £C Wl , Los Angeles Superior Court No. C 688 460 and $aD Diego Pipeline gq, y, Bpgrd 21 $c]allzation. etc.. gS Al],, Loa Angeles Superior Court No. C 688 463 This correspondence will serve as our report with respect to the above - captioned matter. As you will recall, in past years, the City had an obligation to provide notice to the County that it had been nerved with lawsuits requesting tax refunds and, specifically, to request the County Counsel's Office to defend such matters. Effective January 1, 1988, the law now provides that the County is to be servnd with the lawsuits and is presumed to act on behalf of the cities for which it collected taxes. The City may, pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation code Section 5148, "opt outR of the litigation insofar as representation by the County Counsel's Office. Stated otherwise, the city does have the choice, in accordance with the provisions of California Revenue and Taxation Code, of defending itself in the litigation as opposed to having the matter defended by the County Counsel's Office on the City's behalf. Our analysis of the State law in this area indicates that the City's relatively low level of involvement in the matter would mil.tate against the City retaining its own counsel to defend the matter. Accordingly, we recommend that the City Council, by minute action, direct your office to correspond with the County Counsel's Office evidencing the City of Rancho Cucamonga's intent to continue the representation of the County Counsel's office in the above - referenced matters. 3s3 ^- _ may' y`Y�. err • *,`1_v° �. ._ __ � � . - • - •_(•w, :e "r_ Ss� Memorandum to: Beverly Authelet July 25, 1988 ' Page Two Of courso,'in accordance with the provisions of the _,`� Ca).i,ovaia Revenue and Taxation Code,. representation of the - Cftp•b intereste'by the County will require that the City pay- a- i'.a pro -rata share'of the costs and expenses of'litigation, I including attorneys fcos. However, based upon the large number "•n of entities in the State (virtually all) appearing in the i matter, it would appear that the City(s exposure to such .' expenses would be particularly as compared to having independent counsel represent the City. For all of the foregoing reasons, we recommend the City Council permit the County Counsol•s Office to defend the matter on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. .g Please provide the City Council a copy of this memorandum for its next City Council meeting in order that it may take a position on the matter. AVA:pmm L \133 \HH340AUTH \R.C. 15H �L yH• Sa ti a.5/ -ca 'Nv- -k' -! kNd ht q. onga,P,.' �D alzn-'3 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE July 21, 1988 Mr Lauren Wasserman City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Laurent In reference to the July 26 sign ordinance meeting, the chamber at the present time is completing a survey of our members regarding the effects of the proposed ordinance changes on their businesses. We had "peered an August date for the meeting and'for that reason•we.have not completed our preparation We understand that this vas the only time that all of the council vould be able to attend due to prior vacation schedules. Pox this r1paagia-we over the scheduled Item be carried to tb first act in September and suggest a meeting date in the later Ku-g-uvr --------- Thank you for your Consideration in this matter. Sincerely, He e roe, Pr Ji t President J1 h . ..... Be Chamber of CD=ercc . . I cc, Mayor Dennis Stout Brad Buller 8280 UTICA AVENUE, SUITE 180 • RANCHO CUCAMON A, CAI IFORNIA91730 • 7141987-1012 C AV Pz -A6 ;.d.,, CITY OF RANCIIO CUMIONGA ' , MEMORANDUM Mom, DATE: July 28, 1988 '•tot City Council VWXt Pecs Wright and Deborah N. Erow Councilmembers SUBJECI% RECYCLING SDECoNNITTEE UPDATE The folloving is a brief outlius of the current projects the Recycling Subcommitter is vorking oa. I. West End Solid Waste Alternatives Coalition (WESWAC) - meets second Thursday of each month - Legislative Coordination Subcommittas a. Proposed Styrofoam Ordinance b. Tracking Legislation - Recycling Subcommittee a. Western Waste Industries coordinated a tour of their Station, and E1 Sobrante Landfill, Torrance Transfer July 25, 1988. Redondo Beach Buy Back Center on S has sahadulad b. amtour of their facilitiesoont August 8, 1988 The National Solid Wastes management Association (NSWH&) c. has scheduled their conference for September 7-9, 1988 and vill be held In Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Solid Waste Advisory Council Y.eets fourth Wedner,day of each month - - Recycling Subcommittee e. Landfill Crisis. - Sludge Subcommittee a. Water issues. L 5� m rc �;,^:bRi�-yk "rA'y:i :. C: a'- '.���,�s.��:e Y�.�... ... -_ •¢'d.`v� -' sr,.64.'9 -a .... Y'-a= ..�. July 28, 1488 ' Recycling Subcomittes Hpdatps �. al Page Two 3. "In Housa" Recycling ;Projec to, "t — White Paper Recycling — PIA Council — School Districts — City /County Coordination of Teacher's Recycling Cuide — Rotary Breakfast Club - Commercial /Industrial Recycling Issues — Proposed Pilot Weekly Recycling Days — Coordinate with Haulers — Library Display of Environmental Issues — Includes Recycling Isa,es (Coordinated vith County of San Bernardino — Ongoing) Erlalzfflz- Alta-::Loma School -Dis OM,* lea 370 Afta Loma ,C&MmU9170I 7141/967-076i 93SO-Flasellne Road ftst uzoAUAhsa V WWAO� Utabllad USS CITY Or PAM1CRO C ODIAINISTRI -FION hMTehaA oem fi August 2, 1988 AUG 021988 W•� Hamm I . ftOaVWrXTAMW" 9r it8t9i -t t.. XM A mn Mr. Lauren Wasserman f City Manager 'i City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Alta Loma, CA 91701 Dear Lauren, The Alta Loma School District does not ham suffent capital funds to develop our district off Ice facilities Intended for the unused school site on Beryl Avenue. Therefore, I am withdrawing our request for the Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 87-41 which would allow the district to davolop, these ' facilities on the 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District, located on the cast side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202-041-01 and 42. ncerely, John E. McMurtry Superintendent JEM/cdm ovm.wunrn .. ts 6226 Topaz Alta Loma, CA 91701 August 3, 1988 Rancho Cucamonga City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Proposed historic landmark designation of 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. APH /227- 131 -23 Dear Council .Members- This letter is to update and letter of Ju,:_ 15, 1988. I would like to y0 on record again as being opposed to the designaVon of the Fisher house, (7165 Etiwanda Avenue), as anhistoric landmark for the following reasons: 1 The house is in the way of properly developing the 4.1 acres. The zoning on the property is LH residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). The land also falls within the community service overlay district. The house is clearly.nat compatible with the above uses. 2. The house is to very poor condition and would require extensive renovation costing well over $100,000.00. It is certainly not an appropriate use of the city's power to make a private property owner bear that kind of financial loss. 3. I do not want the possible moving or demolition of my ht..ae subiect to review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission I would be placed at the mercy of people who obviously have no concern with the wishes or desires of the property owner 4 To my knowledge, not a single member of the Historic Preservation Commission or anyone connected with the city has contributed one dime to the purchase or upkeep of and p pro perty, yet they want to control its future develoant. Hy family has owned this oroperty for over 30 years and certainly nave the right to develop it to its highest and best use. 5. I don't believe it is right for the city to designate a home an historic landmark if the property owner objects. I feel that this would be a misuse of the city's power. It should be my decision as to whether I restore, move, or demolish ma own home. If you take this right away, then what rights do i have left, other that paying taxes on the property year after year? 6 As far as I know, not a single member of the Historic Preservation Commission lives in a home that is designated an historic landmark, even though at least 1 member resides in a house that would qualify. �a rf� ` 1� �y E p'YJ o 1 Its indlvidaai? "who spoke after me at the June ISth council aneting said that he lives;;n a hoari omWctoria Street which wouldlqualify as an historic'landmark , bu': that he did not want'his. home designated as such-because of,the restrictions that designation would impose. Then he proceede'd'to demand that -the Fisher home b`e made an historic landaarl add that he wanted,the Flocker's to keep and restoreat at its p -went location. Apparently, some pco'ple are unwilling- - to subJecw themselves to the 'same- restrictlons',.they, are. trying to impose on; ether;." 3 If the city wishos -to preserve the Fisher home, I am more thaw willing to donate the stricture, providing, that -is is moved from gib% proper •* at the F city's expense within a- reasonable amount of time. The rjome covid be moved directly across the street between the Garcia house and 'the ESAwanda church or possibly to Chaffey College and the proposed historic' park. If the city wishes to recognize the historic signifiicance of the Fisher home, then I world sueport the designation of the home as an historic point of interest—T.utea o an historic landmark; Finally, I reget that circumstances force me to make the following statement: I hereby reserve all rights under the law to any legal recourse n., iary ` as a result of actions taken by the city council, it's representatives or persons advising these individuals. Nothing in this letter shall be construed as at waiver of any of my rights to take legal action for full recovery of any losses I incure. Sincerely, Robert C. Flocker cc: Eric S. Jacobson, Esq. - Z3; ,�1