The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/09/07 - Agenda Packet.s FTM __ �r'E�r h.''rri':dr ^yF "r :,+}•• � Y-i`E..i K. CITY COUNCIL A G E N D+ A CrkY QF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS Ist and 3rd Wednesday, — 7.30 P.m. Septeaber 7, 1988 i Lions Part Co:nmr'nity Center I 9161 Base Line Road Ranchc Cucamonga City Councilmcmbers I Dennis L Stout. var., Pamcla J Wnght, v-m Pr re- Deborah N. Brawn. Charles J Buquct. Jeffrey King. Lauren !vl Wn,crman. c i va..n. Jnmes 'Aad.man. cc. cR...,. B•scny A Authelet. e,., erd City Omer. 989 -1851 Lions Pak: 980.3145 r i k i 'v n 5 J �e City Council Agenda y. September 7, 1988 PAGE` =' 1 } All items submitted for the City Council Agenda met Se in writing. She deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p. A. on the Ysdnesday prior to the meeting. The City Clark's Office roceives all such Items. A- CAM SO OnMIL 1. Pledge of Allogiaace w Flag. 2. Roll Call: Brown _, Buquet , Stout King _, And Wright ' 0. Am100gCRM81frS/P1898RSAYI0R9 1. Presentation of ten year service pin to Jerry Crant, Building Officiall Karen Matcham, Recreation Supervisor{ and Jim Schroeder, Building Inspector Supervisor. C. 0099RMr CALKMOAR The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine and non- oatrovermial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Coaoeilmember or member o1 the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: August 3, 1988 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/17/88, 8/14/88, 1 and 8/31/88, ano Payroll ending 8/14188 and 8/20188 for the total amount of $18967,060.956 3. Approval to receive and file current Iavestrent Schedule 16 as of 8/31/88. 4. Alcoholic 0average Application for On -Sale Cenral 24 Rating Place, Pepper's Mexican Cantiva, MBA Services, Inc., 9740 19th Street. 5. Approval to adopt the Cann Appropriation Limit 26 Resclution as recomputed by the audit firm of Lance, Sell 6 Lunghard from the base year 1978 -79 to the present. yn City Council Agenda a'vrr t September 7, 1908 PAGE ♦i 2 y RESOLUTION 00. 68 -519 27 A RESOLUTION. OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGi CALIFORNIA, BE- ESTABLISHING THE BASS YEAR APPROPRIATION LIMIT AND EVERY FISCAL YEAR THEREAFTER, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE ZIIIB OF THE CALIFORRL NTE CONSTITUTION 6. Approval of fin. 87-88 budgetary adjustments. 29 7. Approval of. budgetary adjustments for the Community 33 Development Block Grcut Program, General and Special Revenue Funds for Fiscal Year 1988 -89. S. Approval of tuition reimbursemaot of $900 per fiscal 35 year. 9. Approval of the acquisition of Engineering /Public 36 Works /Maintenance Equipment and Vehicles Cor fiscal year 1988 -89. 10. Approval to confirm John Mannerino for the appointment 39 to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board of Directors. 11. Approval to order the annexation of certain territory to 40 a special asintenance district for Parcel Nap 112229 Tract No. 13722 and Tract No. 13825. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -520 47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR PARCEL NAP 11222 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -521 50 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THd ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT NO. 13722 A/AWY, City Council Agenda September 7, 1988 PACE 3 f; RESOLUTION NO. 88 -522 .53 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ON RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEEATIOR OF CERTAIN TERRITORY To A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT HO. 13825 12. Approval to reaffirm a City Council and Planning 56 Commission decision made on August 17, 1988, of an appeal for a proposed subdivision of 18.28 acres of land into 4 par:als located 'between 7th and 8th Streets east of Uellmgn Avenue - APN 209 - 171 -58 - Environmental Aasessment and Tentative Parcel Nap 10981 - Golden Nest Equity. RESOLUTION NO. 68 -523 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP HUMBER 10981, TO SUBDIVIDE 18.28 A^.RES INTO 4 PARCELS IN TUB GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPHINT DISTRICT, SUUARSA NO. 3, LOCATED BETWEEN 7TH AND EYE STREET, EAST Of MIKAN AVENUE - APR 209- 171-58 13. Api :oval to release Agreement for Postponement of 65 Covenants, Conditions and Restriction for Tract 13443, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -524 66 A RESOLUTION OF INS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF CCWS FOR TRACT 13443 14. Approval to award the "Coustruetion of Traffic Signals 68 and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Highland Avenue and Arebibald Avenue Improvement Project" to Hovey Electric, Inc., for the amount of 465,260.00 to be funded from TDA /Article 8 - Account No. 12 -4637 -8824. ? City Council Agenda ///I- r • r� September 7, 1988 PAGE : }y 4� 15. Approval to award.-=the City Corporation Yard Project 71 Phase I, Bdaa Bid "A" including Alternate 4 deduction to Lucky Construction Com,any for the amount of $2,098,000, to be funded frcn Capital Rcesrve - Account No. 25 -0285 -7043. 16. Approval to award the Tryon Street Sidevalka, west of 74 Archibald Improvement Project including Alternate "A "s seat aids of Jadeite to B -1 Enterprise Corporation, for the !—uat of $27,101.76, to be funded from Pedestrian Crants /Article 3 - Account No. 16- 4637 -8717. 17. Approval to award the Via Carrillo Drive Improvement 76 Project from Avenida Vejar to east of Sierra Madre Avenue to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $1751114,71 to be funded from Crants C.D.B.C. - Account No. 28-4333 -8704. 18. Approval to award the Hallman Avenue Storm Drain 78 Improvement Project from Monte Vista Street to the Southern Pacific Railroad and the Cucamonga Storms Drain to Steve Bubalo Construction Company for the amount of $1,188,225.25 to be funded from Drainage Facilities Fund - Account No. 23 -4637 -8763. 19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for al Tract 13342, located on the northeast corner of Harmosa Avaaue and 19th Street, submitted by First Nationwide Network Mortgage. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -525 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13342 20. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and 83 Improvement Security and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintemnce District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 13271, located at the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Levis Development Coy my. j City Council Agenda a9,P3 September 7, 1988 PAGE :r 5 RESOLUT ?ON NO. 88 -526 84 A RESOLUT10H OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY -OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMOENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13271 RESOLUTION 110. 88 -527 85 A RESOL.11OH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACY 13271 21. Approval of Nap, execution of Improvement Agreement and 88 Improvement Security, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Do. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 12969, located at Arrow Route and Edwin Street, submitted by Nagop and Vegia Xevor Yasedjian. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -528 89 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROV1WWr SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 110. :2969 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -529 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE - - DISTRICT FOR TRACT 12969 22 Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and 93 Improvement Security, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 13541, located north of fled gill Country Club Drive, east of Valle Vista, on Sierra Vista Drive, submitted by Allmark Incorporated. ro s: City 1 Agenda S ptember7, 1988 af'm a d PA E ;V 6 ' RESOLUTION NO. 88 -530 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • OF RANCHO CUCAI:ONCA, CALIFORNIA! APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13541 RESOLUTION 80. 88 -531 95 A RESOLDTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF02NIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13541 23. Approval to accept improvements, release bonds sad file a notice of complstiou fort Parcel Mao 9666 - located on the northeast corner of 99 Moonstone Avenue and Hillside Road Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 9 13,000 jRESOLUT104 NO. 88 -532 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9646 ANO AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A dOTICZ OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 12914 - located on the northeast corner of 100 Archibald Avenue and Highland Avcoue Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $326,000 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Hand (Street) $ 32,600 not t; City Council Agenda OFm•b•�;? °, September 7, 1988 PAGE v 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -533 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE POSLIC IMPROFEHZ TS FOR TRACT 12914 AND AUrdORIZ1t70 THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 24. Approval to release cash deposits in the total amount of 102 $5,000 to Kaufman 6 Broad of Southern California, Inc. for Model Nome Sales Trailers for Tracts 12937 -1 and 12935. 25. Approval to execute contract (00 88 -121) for the Grove 103 Avenue at Stb Street and Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project awarded to Vance Corporation for the amount of $183,626.00 plus IOT contingency ($202,000.00) to be funder from Syaten Development Fund, Account No. 22 -4637 -8751{ P.A.U. Section 31 Account No. 17- 4637 -8776) and TDA Article 3- Account No. 12- 4637 -8783. 26. Approval Co axec_te Agreemect for i"tallation of Public 104 Improvement and Dedication (00 88 -122) between Arnold C. Fabling, Jr. and Cleo J. Fabling, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 7539 Carrell" Street, located on the east side of Carnalian Street batveaa Vivero Street and Baca Line Road, for the Carnelian Beautification Project. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -534 105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FOR ARNOLD C. FEELING JR. AND CLEO J. - - FEHLINO, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGH SANG 27, Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract 106 and Lien Agreement :CO 88 -142) and ordering the manexation to Landscape Maintenance Distrirt No. 3 for DR 86-46, located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Michael Pats and Gary H. Braaksna. PAGE City Council Agenda yy? _ 9e }tember 7, 1988 8 � 'e RESOLUTION NO. 88 -535 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCYPTINO A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CORMCT;AND LIEN ACRXTHEMT FROM MICHAEL UATZ AND CART-H. ERAWXt AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOT AND CITY CLRRK,TO SIGN THE SAME RESOLUTION NO. 88 -536 108 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CRY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OIDERING TES ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR DR 86-46 28. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract 111 and Lien Aareeoent (00 88 -143) from Donald L. Mahoney for a single family residence, located on the vast side of Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Road. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -537 112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A RE" PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIES AGRUMENT FROM DONALD L. MAHONEY AND AUTHORISIM:G THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 29. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice 114 Inviting Bids" for the City-wide Concrete Repair Annual Maintenance Contract to be funded from Engineering /Maintenance Cont.%a- Services - Account No. 01- 4647 -6028. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -538 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DF RANCHO CUCAROhCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CITY -NID3 CO4CRM EVAIR CONTRACT", IN SAID CITY AND ADTdORIZINC AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO AMRTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS r, � 'e r� r� City Council Agenda September 7. 1928 PACE . 9 ,lU Y' i 30. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice 120 Inviting Bids ",', for, the Laadscare ;laintenaoce District No. 2- (Victoria) and'�Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista); Landscape and Irrigation Worn naacc Contract to be fu6jed from Landoape Maintenance District No. 2, Account No. 41- 4130 -6028 and Landscape - Maintananee District No. 4 - Account No. 43 -4130 -6028. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -539 121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF,RANCHO CUC MONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR , THE - LANDSCAPE NAINIEUANCE,DISTRICr NO. 2 ASD 7.APDSCAPE ;MIHTENANCE DISTRICT B0. 4; LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION NAINT3RANCE CONTRACT" IN SAID CITY AND AVTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY X TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 31. Approval to authorise the advertising of the "Notice 126 Inviting Bids" for tue Haven Nodian Islands and San Bernardino County Flood Control; (various locations) Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract to be funded from Ent Loser ing/Naintenance Contract Service Account No. 01- 46474028 (flocd control) and Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 4G- 4130 -6028, 46 -4130 -6028, and 43- 4130 -6028 Maven Medians). kCSOLUTION NO. 88.340 127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOHCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN MEDIAN ISLANDS AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M T I • - PAGE T -xdii' 4#0 City Council Agenda September 7, 1988 101- v` 326 Approval to authorize the adverc.ui.•,g of the "Notice 132 Inviting Bids'• for the Central Fond Parkways (various t locatioos)1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. (various( location, City- vide), Landscape Maintenance Distrirt'•No. 3'•(Hysop), and Landscape Maintenance District No.- 5, (26th and Hemoaa)i Landscape sad a, Irrigat Lou - Naintenenco Contract, to be funded from Engineering /Maintenance Contract Service Account No. 01- 4647 -6028 (General Food Parkvaya), Landscape Maintenance District No. 1'Account No. 40- 4130 -6028, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Account No. 42 -4130 -6028 and Landscape Iaintenance District NP. S - Account No. 44- 4130 -3028. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -:41 133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO -.UCAHOHCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND OPECIFICATIOHS FOR THE "G':UMPAL FOND PAMY,VAYS, LANDSCAPE MNINIXW%7' DIST2ICr 110. 1, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 60. 3 AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 0. 51 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT ", IN SAID =1 AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 33. Set public Learing for October 5, 1988 - Approval to 138 annex lots 4 through 12 inclusive of Tract 8563, located on *ante Vista Court east of Eastvood Avenue and west of Hat ussa \venuo, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. RESOLUTIOH M0. 88 -542 140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE CITY E.JINEER'8 REPORT FOR ANNEXATION OF LOTS a THEODOR 12 :HCLUSIVE OF TRACT 8583 TO i LAHOSCA9E MAINTENANCE JISTRICT NO. 1 t T I • ' PAGE City Council Agenda September 79 1988 I lI RESOLUTION NO. 88 -543 145 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE F CITY OF ]LANCED CUCAMONGA, CAWL)ANIA, � DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE i ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE Ml.lHrEHANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIM AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 34. Sat public hearing for October 5, 1988 - Approval to 147 annex Tracts 8369, 8805 and 8806 (Rochester Tracts), located on the east stde of Rochester Avenue betveen Base Line goad and Foothill Boulevard, to Landscape Maintenance DiatrinL No. 1. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -544 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO I RESOLUTION NO. 88 -545 154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DE"kRINC ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANh..XATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, MI ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIM3 AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 35. Set public hearing for October 5, 1988 - Mcdificatioo to 156 Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract 13367 - Quintessence Davrlopment Company - Appeal of the Planning Comission decision requiring the payvent of in -lieu fees for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Belleau, Avenuu and Amethyst Avenue for a subdivision of 6.87 acres of land into 19 single family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dvelling units per acre), located vast of the intersection of Amethyst Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 201 - 711 -01, 02, 03. PAGE Tyr Cit y Council Agenda 4444v� ? September 7, 1988 12 "ce v �." D. COIISENT ORDINANCES ur z Sy. The ,.:allowing Ordinancei,•have had public hearings at the. r .r i time o! first reading. `' 8ceaod readings are expected to be d rantiaa.&ad ma- controversial. They will be acted upon by 1[, xy the Council shone time without dietuesion. The City Clerk .j• will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. k 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSIG[Hr AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMSNDYSNT t `^ 88 -06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Title q5 179 Chapter 17108, of the Rancho- C•ucamouga Municipal Code establishing minisum required sizes for =Iti- ;� family dwellings. '.' ORDINANCE NO. 366 (second reading) 158 )" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE �. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ). AMXHDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08, OF THE " RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE " ESTABLISHING MINIMUM REQUMSO SIZES FOR �+ M4T.TI- FAMILY D=-1 ISCS 2. BNVIRORMRNTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PU1Y AMENDIIENY 88 -01: SUBAREAS 2 AND 3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan, erpanding the boundaries of Subarea 3 (General Industrial) to include portions of the area on the south aide of Arrow Routs, between Hellman and Vineyard, currently located in 8ubrrea 2 (General Industrial). Modification of permitted and conditionally permitted uses may also be considered. ORDINANCS N0. 367 (second reading) 160 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CXNCIL OF THS - - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01 EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF SUBAREA 3 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) 0 INCLUDE PORTIONS OF THE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARRON ROUTE, BETWEEN HELLMAN AND VINEYARD, CURRENTLY LOCATED IN SUBARLk 2 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) �a t City Council Agenda �,dbp�3 September 7, 1988 PAGE 13 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03 - C1rY OF RANCW CUCAWAYCA - A request to amend Figure 5 -18 of the Etivanda Specific Plan pertaining to Community Traits. ORDIFANCS NO. 368 (ceaoud reeding) 165 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIHC ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03, AMENDING VICURE 5-18 PSRTAINIMG TO CON70WITY TRAILS 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND STINAHOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMUDMENr 88 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA"GA - A request to anand the Etivanda Specific Plan to establish a consistent wall design and sotbatk for East Avenue. ORDINANCE NO. 369 (second reading) 168 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COONCIL Of :HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88-02, A RZQUEST TO ESTABLISH A CONSISTENT WALL DESIGN AND SETBACL FOR EAST AVENUE S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANW. 7^ IC rW7 AMENDMENT 88 -01 - FIRST CITY PEOPERTI CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA - A request to &=a, Etivanda Specific Fie n (1) to widen Cherry Avenue from the intersect%on of 24th Street (Sum.it Avenue) to Interstate 15 from a Collector Street to a Secondary ArtariwlE and to designate as special design streets the stove portion of Cherry Avenue, en. the Loop R-ad; and (2) to amend the trails map to relocate a portion of the equestrian trail to the north side of 24th Street - (Summit Avenue) and to delete a portica along 24th Street between Cherry Avenue to the Eastern Boundary of the City sod to extend the bicycle trail on the south side of 24th Street from Zest Avenue to thn tateru boundary of the City. III 1 i PACs; �. ^ City Council Agenda ^•+ mo,jy- _ 8opteaber 7,.1988 14�,, .1 f; t k ORDIMANCE•NO. 370 (second reading) 172 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE C17Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY-Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPEOVING EvvIomNTAL' ASSESSMENT AND BTIWAHDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT $"I,T0 WIDEN CHERRY AVENUE FUN 24T9 STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) TO INTERSTATE 15 FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A SECONDARY ARTERIAL AND TO DESIGNATE AS SPECIAL DESIGN STREETS THE ABOVE POLTION OF CHERRY AVZHUE, AS WELL AS 24TH STU "T PrM=V THE LOOP ROAD AND CHERRY AVEN .' CND THE LOOP ROAD (EXHIBITS 1 AND Y;1 AND TO AMEND THE TRAILS MAP TO .':ILOCAT26 A PCRTIOH OF THE BQUSSTPIAH Ir"M TO THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET (B TWIT A954k1E) AND TO MZTTS A PORTION ALCM ' 'RN S`UEET BETWEEN -,C ERRY AVENUE ANL ERH BOUNDARY OF THE CITY AND) 118 BICYCLE TTI.IIL ON TIM SOUTH 6). L4SU STREET PRIM EAST AVENUE TO '= 4"TERN BOUNDARY 01' THE CITY (EXHIBIT 3) A. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND SECTION 5.04.150 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSIWRSS LICENSES BRINGING PENALTITSINTO CDNBORMANCR WITH STATE LAW. ORDINANCE NO. 21-C (second reading) 178 AN ORDIgAHCC OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5.06.150 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LICENSE.91 LATE PAY1ZNT PENALTIES 7. CONSIDZRATION OF FORMATION OF RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARXING - ONLY DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY - Adding Chapter 10.50 to _ Title 10 of the Rancho Cueamonga Municipal Code to provide for the establishment o(' permit parking districts as designated by City Council. (Continued from August 31 1988 meeting) .1 f; t k -' f City Council Agenda September 7, 1988 PAGE" " }t '1 15 % ORDINANCE 110. 39-C (second reading) 179 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.50 TO TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESIABLISHKBNT OF PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS R. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have bean advertised and /or posted as public hearings u required by 1". The chair will open the wasting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO AUTHORIZE AN AIBHDMBNT TO THE CONTRACT 183 (CU 188 ) BETNi �H THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AAn THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE WLIPORNiA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RRTIRENHNT SYSTEM PER9 TO PROVIDE THE THIRD LEVEL OF SURVIVORS BENEFIT COVERAGE. ORDINANCE NO. 372 (first reading) 187 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CBOT.) GRANTEE 188 PERFORMANCE REPORT. 1987-88 FISCAL YEAR - Review of the use of Block Grant funds including the status of funded prolectc and achievemaat of local and federal goals. - RESOLUTION NO. 88 -566 202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CONNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOhnA, APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOC[ GRANT PROGRAM CIANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT, 1987 -68 FISCAL YEAR I ��f<v!"�J�i... y � .,• t�4� �.yYy)Y'.�'.�ai+Y��' - ^�J:?.'t(�'��rj ' r-� f city Council Agenda September PAGE n 71 1988 16 r 3. COHNONITY DEPELOPNRN! BLOCK GRANT - REPROCRAMMING OF 203 $40.000 IA UNE7IP NDSD FUNDS FRON Ids 1986 -87 AND 1987 -88 Ti 8I8CAL Y8AR3 TO TBe BEHON BOULEVARD eTRHET IMPROVEMENT ,r` ;�• 9 PROJECT. ..ti RESOLUTION N0. 88 -547 205 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE F „ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, i REPROGRAMMING AVAILABLE CONHONITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO N.M STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO FER07 BOULEVARD ` BETNEE9 ARCHIBALD AND R'Wj=A (TURNER) AVENM is 4. ENVIEOMMENTAL AGSE98NP.NT FOR TIES }RN)IFICATION OF THE 207 YOO'AI DOULEVARD - INTERSTATE 15 INTERGIAUCJS - It is vecermended that a Negative Declaration be approved on the 14818 of the ewironmental assenmeat prepared for the proposed interchange modiHcntion. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -54e 214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIPONNEMTAL ASSRBSMENT AND ISSUANCE OF A NSGITIVE DECLARATION FOR TM PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE I- 11/700THILL BOULEVARD INTEHCMAtICE 5. EM VrRONMCNfAL AS9RSSME,TT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BS -15 :15 DESIGN COOPERATIVE - An appeal of a planing Commission decision to deny Development Review 88 -15, the development of a 1,700 square foot restaurant on .38 acres of land within the Office /Professional District, located at the nortbwcat corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APH 208 - 811 -58. VARIANCE 87 -06 - US9IGN COOPERATIVE - An appeal of a 215 Planning Co ®isel0n decision to deny Varihnce 87 -06, a request for reduction in the average landscape and building setback for a 1,700 square foot restaurant on .38 acres of land within the Offica /Professional District, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APH 208 - 811 -58. c .ti `�: , .w;1"X:; a'Lr`•:`e �'ui.� f�.;R,t; - - �:y.)':ry �Ot: rL !; 4" '. :F PAGE = =ti• rye City council Ageoda 7, 1985 *� 17T. S eptevbar fThe PUBLIC 6EARIHCS OOP folloviog ite bavo no legal publication or posting requirements. Tre Chair vill open the veeting to receive ' public testimony. 1. CONSIDSRATION Of HEARING AND PASSING UPON OFIJB(TION9 OR 238 _.y C) PROTESTS. IF ANY. WHICH NAY .TIE RAISED BY 1.AY PROPERTY OWSERS O@ OTHER INTERESTED P/.SSONS REC-MMING THE NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION THAT WERE POSTED AUGUST 23, 105. ON THE PROPERTIES FRONTING 19TH STREET BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE ' AND GRTLLU AVENIB. IN THE CITY OF RANCHO COCA!!ONGA IN ACCORDANCE WITH (RAFTER 27 OP TH6 IMPROVEIOENT Acr OF 1911. ' V RESOLUTION N0. 88 -549 242 b. i• A RE.gOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE i' CITY L�Y RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 0-LIF0RN A, '➢ ORDERIN2 THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AN THE PROPERTIES FRONTING :$ 19TH STREET Brr=N HERMOSA AVENUE AND CARTILU AVENUA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA Cf-=S FOR STREETS AND HIGUI!AY8 SECTION 5970 THEO 5880 MORE COMMOHLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 j 1. CONSIDERATION TO MODIFY CHAPTER 10.56 OF THE CITY CODE 247 TO ALLOW THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUCK ROUTES AND RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS. AS DESCRIBED IN THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE. ORDINANCE N0. 373 (first reading) 248 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIDE CIT:! OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CWTSR 10.56 OF TITLC 10 OF rZ RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COOED TO FROVIDE FOR THE DESIGNATION OF TRUCE 'A0UTE8, RESTRICTED TRUCE ROUTES, COMMERCIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER VEHICLES PROHIBITED IRON USING CERTAIN CITY STREETS, AND DESIGNATION OF TERMINAL ACCESS ROUTES FOR EXTRA -LARGE TRUCES Ll v City Council Agenda ,PAGIii, 1r September 7, 1988 18 (¢ C. CITY HBHAcER'B STAFF REPORTS 2, -. The following irams do not legally require any public testimay, although the Cb-ir say open the meeting for public input. 1. RRCONSIDSRATION OF Phi 03XII DRIVE APPROACH AT 8362 253 EILLSIDX ROAD SUBMITTED BY MRS. CHERL RAMIREE. (Originally heard on July 61 1988 2. CONSIDERATION TO CREATE A TASK. FORCE TO ASSESS LONG TERM 254 SPORTS FACILITIES NEEDS. 3. A PROPOSAL TO DEBIGNZE THE THOMAS NOUSE. 7980 VINEYARD 256 AVENUE, AS A LANDMARK - A small bungalow built mad owned by 4be Thomo Family on a site proposed for an office buildirg. (Continued from, August 17, 1988 mating) RESOLUTION NO. 88- 516 276 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE, 7980 VINEYARD AVSHUS AS A LANDMARK 4. ANNEXATION 88 -04 - A11 SON DEVELOPMENTS. INC. - A 278 request to approve a atatemat of intention to amaz a 54 acre portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the southwest corner of Etiwands Avema and 25th Street - AFN 225- 082 -01. 274 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -550 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFCdNIA, DHCLABIMG INTENT To PFRSUE A (MANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESIING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CONgISSIO9 TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION Of PROPERTY GEHERALLS LOCATED AT THE SOUTE.7HST COR.NSR OF ETINANDA AVENUE AND 25TH STREET ` City Council Agenda September 7, 198 os :k4• e Tom_ PAGE ` 8 19 ti 5, TAR REVENUEAXCHANCE FOR ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS: v 297 A. ANNEIATION 88-01- - PULSAR DEVELOPMENT - A request to approve the Tax Revenue Exobaage for annexation proceedings iLAFC 2503) between the County of San Bernardino, and the City of Reecho Cucamonga for approxixataly 51.47 acres of land located nortb of , Highland Avenua, soutb of Summit Avenue extension, east of Dear Creek utility corridor, and wear of the County /City boundary - APN 225- 161 -19p 32 -38, 49, 53, 55, and 61., RESOLUJI'IOM 110. 88 -551 301 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA., DETERMINING TAE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN 'AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING FROM TEE JURISDICTIONAL CHANCE DESCRIBED BY LAFC NU. 2503 B. ANNEXATION 88 -02 - TERANCE WLCHER - A request to 297 approve the Tax Revenue Exchange for annexation proceedings (LAFC 2504) between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately 96 acres c land located at the northwest corner of Etivanda Avenue and 24th Street - APR 226 -071 -05. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -552 304 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T4E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE EXCHAK. D BETWEEN AND _ AMONG THE COUNTY Or SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL CHANCE DESCRIBED BY LAFC NO. 2504 ti t PAGE p City Council Agenda September 7, 1988 20 C. ANNEXATI2H 188 -03 - CARYN COtO'ANIt ETIVANDA 297 HIGHLANDS - ♦ request to approve the Tax Revenue Exchange for annexation proceedings (LAFC 2505) between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamoapa for approximately 303 a,res of land located at thw northeast corner of 24th Street (Summit Avenue) and Yardman Bullock Road - APR 226- 082-16, 24 -27. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -553 307 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, aETEBNINING THE,AMOUNT 'OF PROPERTY TAE REVENUES IO BE EXCHANGED BETUMEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CU^.AMONGA RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE DESCRIBED BY IAFC NO. 2505 B. COUNCIL EOSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They arm not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR HSB MEETING This is the tiro for City Council to identify the item they wish to discuss at the next mating. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next J. COMMUNNICATIONS FROM TER PUBLIC This is the tine and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue net previously included on the Agenda. The City Conceit may receive testimay and set the matter for a subsequent mating. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. PAGE", City Council Agenda V 8optember 7, 1988 21 S. ABTOBFMNf . Authelet. City Clert of the Cicy of Faacho reby certify that a true, accurate copy of the nda "a posted on Septed'aar 2, 1988, seventy -tvo rior to the meatimg per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base r X '. t August 3, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL Nuu1E8 Secular Nearing I 1. CALL TO ORDII i { A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, August 3, 1988, in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 game Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmemberst Deborah H. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey King, Panels J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present caret Assistant City Manager, Jack Len; City Clark, Beverly A. Authelat; Deputy City Attorney, Andrew Areaynski; City Planner, Brad Buller; Sr. Planner, Larry Henderson; Assoeitte Planner, Arlene Ba:.}.s; Deputy City Engineer, Bill Silva; Sr. Civil Hnginaer, Barry& Hanson; St. Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau; Sr. Civil Engineer, Mike Olivierl Associate Civil Engineer, Chuck Mackey. No items submitted. ** * * ** B. ANMOUtCffNK=/_'119XNTATIM * * * * * * C. CONSENT CALRNDAl C1. Approval of Minutest June 15, 1988, and June 28, 1988. C2. Approval of Warrants, Regivter Nos. 7/20/88 and 7/27/88, and Payroll ending 1/21/88 for the total amount of $1,054,393.24. C3. Approval to receive and file currant Investment Schedule as of July 31, 1988. C4. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Off -Sale Beer 6 Wine, Arrow Plaza Market, Peter S. Delager, 9755 Arrow Highway, $B. CS. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Off -Sale Ceceral, Foothill Liquors, Eno Dong 6 Jung Wan Kim, 8161 W. Foothill Boulevard. C6. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Off -Salo Baer 6 Wine, The Lunch Stop, Chong 6 Kong Kim, 9631 Business Center Dr., Suite C. .tt City Coun August 3, Page 2 C7. Approv" to authorizo the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Via Carzllo Drive Ispcaviceent Project, from Avenida Vejar to East of Sierra Madre Avenue to be funded fro: Create C.D.B.C. Account No. 28 -4833 -8704. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -478 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF VIA CARILLO DRIVE IMPROVSHSHT PROJECT FROM AVENIDA VEJAR TO EAST OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE IN a SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C8. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue Improvement Project to be funded from TUA /Article 8 - Account No. 12 -4637- 8624. RESOLUTION NO. 88-479 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING ANS DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIAS C9. Approval to award the Archibald Avenue Widening Improvement Project between Highland Avenue to Lemoo Avenue to Bob Britton Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $124,925.15 to be funded from Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22 -4637 -8755. C10. Approval to accept and ezau,te a Real Property Improvement Contrast and Lien Agreaa t (CO 88 -120) from Beverly Fishback, and release of same from James A. and Beverly Fisbback for a single family residence, located im the north side of Victoria Streat, east of East Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 88-480 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CON rZACT AND LISH AGREEMENT FROM BEVERLY FISHBACE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AIID CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SA1E RESOU7TION NO. 88-481 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMEMI! CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JAMBS A. AND BEVERLY FISHBACE City Council August Page 3 Cll. Approval to execute on saenimant to an Improvement Agreement and Dedication 00 88 -121) with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Clark H. Reason and Marjorie C. Beason for the Amethyst Avenue Reconstruction at 19th Street, to clarify future street improvement requirements for Nineteenth Street along the Eoosen's property frontage. RESOLUTION NO. 88-482 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH CLARK H. BOSSES AND MARIORIE C. "EVEN FOR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FOR AMETHYST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT NMTHENTH STREET C12. Approval to execute an amendment to an Improvement Agreement and Dedication (00 88 -122) with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and William H. Leon and Janet W. Leon 'or the Amethyst Avonua Reconstruction at 19th Street, to clarify future street improvement requirements for Nineteenth Street along the Lane's property frontage. RSSOLUrIOH N0. 88-483 A RE30LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM H. LANE AND JANET W. LANE FOR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FOR AMETHYST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT NINETEENTH STREET C13. Approval to execute, Agreements for Engineering Services for Map and Plan Checking with C O Engineering (CO 88 -123)= Derbiah, Guerra and Associates (CO 88 -124)1 and Don Creek and Associates (00 88 -125), for FY 1988 -89. C14. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -125) for computer maintenance for Apple computer hardware with Computerland of Upland in the amount of $6e 52 to be funded from contract services Account No. 33 -4130 -6028. CIS. Approval to execute improvement agreement and Security for construction of Kenyon Way park as recorded on Tract Map 13442 and Vintage Park a■ recorded on Tract Nap 13445. - RESOLUTION N0. 88-484 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND I&°ROVg}ggy SECURITY FOR KENYON WAY PARK TRACT 13342 AND VINTACR PARK TRACT 13445 C16. Approval to accept the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive as complete, , _ease bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file • notice of completion and approve the final contract amount of $78,000. e City Couneil',Ntnutes 4' tip, iv „e August 5, 198.4 Page 4 RESOLUTION N0. 8"85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT HAVEN AVENUE AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NOR[ C17. Approval to accept the Etivanda Cobblestone Curbs Improveaen: Project as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a notice of completion and approve the final contract aeouat of $56,491.84. ;i RESOLUTION N0. 88-686 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO x CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR THE STINANDA COBBLESTONE CURBS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AITLRORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C18. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parb I and TL for the •r Proposed Etivanda Area I and II Street Rehabilitation and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. A RESOLUTION N0. 88187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OP RANCHO CUMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TUB BICJTROb';PNTAL INITIAL STUDGAY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ETINANDA AREA I AMD II STREET REHABILITATION C19. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Via Carrillo Street Improvements from Avenida Vejsr to Sierra Madre Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLUTION NO. 88-488 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' "PROVING THE ENVIRONMPNTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED VIA CARRILLO STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM AVENIDA VEJAR TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUE C20. Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds and file a notice of completion ion DH 86 -12 located on the south slde of Arrov Miahvav seat of Hadrone Avenue Faithful Performance Bond ( Street) $446,000 City Council Ninutea }re .- August 3, 1988 P.&O S � •X RESOLUTION NO. 88-489 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL 07 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86 -12 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR 86 -38 located on the north side of Jersey Boulevard east of Utica Avows Faithful Perfarmance Bond (Street) $ 11,500 r ABSOLUTION 110. 88-690 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPR0VEM3NTS FOR DR 86 -38 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILTHG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORR Parcel Nan 9829 located on the morthwest corner of Spruce and Elm Avenues Faithful Performance Send (Streat) $ 88,000 x RESOLUTION NO. 88-491 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9829 AND AUTHORIZING MUi PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE YORK S DR 86 -15 located an ehe south aide of Aspen Street between Red Oak Street end Utica Avenue Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 0 11,000 RESOLUTION N0. 88-492 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC I:0'ROVZMCHTS FOR DR 86 -15 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NOAR Tract 10277 located on tht north side of Almond Street east of Carnelian Avenue Releaaet Faithful Performance Band (Strait) $ 25,056 Accopu Maintenance Cuarantea Bond (Street) $ 2,505 ` � ?"•"imL"- k Y^ City Council Miuu Re's August 3, 1988 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 58 -093 A RESOLUTION OF 198 CITY COUNCIL OF TUC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 10277 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C21. Approval to accept improvements, ralwaaa of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12740 located on the south side of Arrow Highway vast of VActcr Avanur Release[ Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 20,500 C22. Approval to seek Request for Proposal to develop the deeigo davaloPmdnt phase of the Centre` Park conceptucl design approved by Council on September 3, 1987. C23. Approval to purchase the real Property defined as the easterly 155.0 feet of Assessor Parcel Ho. 0208-011 -28, 7389 Lion Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the sum of 925,000 from Mark and Kathlecn Johnson. C24. Set public hearing for September 7, 1988, for an Environmental Assessment Review for the proposed modification of the Foothill Boulevard - Interstate 13 Interchange. RESOLUTION N0. 68-494 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC Z. HM1ING DATE OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1988 FOR THE PROPOSED INTERCHANGE MODIFIGATIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ' REVIEW i MOTION1 Moved by Buquat, seconded by King to approve the Concert Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. e a ► s e a r. CONSENT oRDINAxas a • The Consent Ordinances we.v coar;lered after Public Hearing Item F3, a although the minutes rawi .d AlanJa order. City Clara. Authelet read the titles of Ordinance Noe. 364 and 365. D1. RNVIROUM (TAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -06 (PMIEZOHE)- TER1AtiCE MELCIER - A request to prezone t 96 acre por Cioo of the San Bernardino County uniucorporated area (for prezonimg purposes) to' Lev Density Rea.dential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located a- the northwest coiner of 8 tivando Avenue and 24th Street - APR 225 -071 -65. '• City council Ni¢utan' - August 3, 1988 Page 7 ORDINANCE NO 364 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCSO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZNV120HHWM ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMEND?ZMT, DDA 88 -06, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NAP FOR THE PURPOSE Or PREZONING TO LOW DENSITY RaiDBNTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 96 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF STIW11DA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET - A request to approve a Dsvelopmemt Agceewnt for development and annexation of a 96 acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for annexation purposes) located at the eorthwat corner of Etivanda Avenue and 24th Street - ArN 225 -071 -65. ORDINANCE NO. 365 (second reading) All ORDINANCE OF INS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EC. 88 -01 - TERRANCE MELCHER, FOR ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A 96 ACRE PORTION OF SAM BERNARDINO COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREA LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET MOTION' Moved by Ling, necondtd by Wright to wive full reading and adopt said Ordinance dot. 364 and 365. Motion carried 4.4-1 (ABfENTt Buquat - Councilman Buquat had stepped out of the room.) •►a eta E. ADVERTISED POP.LIC HEARINGS 91. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITLONAL USS PEBMT 87-41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A¢ appeal of the Plaaning Co ®iasio¢ s decision denying the development of a school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot transportation- maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the low residential district (2-4 duelling uuits_par acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, mouth of 19th Street - APH 202- 041-01 and 42. Associated vith the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three mature trees. (Continued from 7/20/88 meeting). A letter had bean received froo the Alta Lams School District dated Aurust 2, 1988 stating that because of insulficient capital funds to develop the district office facilities, they requested the item be vithdrawn. ACTIONt Council concurred. C[ty'Couaeils August 3, 1988 Page 8 * * =tams E2 and E3 were handled together + E2. ENVIRONMENTAL THITTAL BTMY PAQi r A E3. -cart report was presented by Hike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engioeor. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no rasponce, .he public hearing was closed. i RESOLUTION N0. 88-495 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C014-011, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO j CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMgMTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS FEOH VEST CITY LIMITS TO JASPER STRERT RESOLUTION N0. 88 -1,96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUHCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIROV"JNTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEw33ICE DECLARATION POE THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET IMPROVE)ENTS PROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO CARTILLA AVENUE NOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquat to approve Resolution No. 80-495 and 88-496, and grant the issuance of negative declarations for the projects. Motioa carried unanimevsly 5 -0. E4. APPEAL OP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - SHITH- Appeal of the Planning Commission decision requiring 1) in -lieu fees for utility undergrounding, and 2) off -site street improvements for the developwot of a 20 unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land in the NedLum -High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), located at tbn terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Mein Street - APH 207 - 251 -22. Staff report presented Sy Earrye Hanson, Sr. Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the mating for public hearing. Addreocang Council wags Alan Smith, 8682 Archibald, stated that the improvements were not the only issue, but obtaining dedications, which could be very expensive, was also r r• hp: i I City Council Minutes August J, 1988 Page 9 an issue. Kagarding the In lieu fate, be stated that their property, was north of the railroad tracts and wonder what the impact would be and the neeusity of putting those lines undargrouad, since it was so close the Ontario H=a. 'here being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Mayor Stout asked if we had the list of those who were notified, and if it included the property owners to the east. Brad Buller, City Planner, responded he had the list end forwarded the list to Mayor Stout. Councilman King asked the developer if he was willing to bring the casement up to City standards. Mr. Smith responded no, not for parcels 19 and 20, since it would be rather expensive. Councilwoman Wright expressed that she did not feel wa should approve a development without having the dedication. Councilman King expressed concern that it might not be brought up to City standards. Mayor Stout concurred with Councilman King, stating that without the dedication we did dot have any rights on this. Councilman Buquet expressed that he bad mom reservations about the dedication since it was Only a can acre parcel. Councilwuran Brown stated that we are trying to upgrade this area and falt it would be a mistake not to take advantage of this. Mayor Stout further expressed that if you were going to put 20 units on as acre, then there would be an impact 01 the street. The dedication would be accessary sined the City would have to take care of the streets to make sure they were safe. Regarding the utility undergroundiog' Councilman Buquet felt that ve should waive the undergrounding requiremnt■ and that we should obtain right -of -ways for the project. Councilwoman Wright expressed that we should obtain the undergrounding. M02IONt Moved by King, seconded by Wright to deny the appeal. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. Cit;Counoil Minutes '• �� -� August 3, 1988 Paga 10 Andrew Arcayaski, City Attorney, stated there would be a Rasolution which would cow back at the peat mating. a a a a ES. report presented by Darryo Hanaoo, Dr. Civil Enginear. Mayor Stout opened the "sting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hnaring was closed. ,ity Clerk Authelet read t I title of Ordinance No. 280 -A. ORDINANCE NO. 280 -A (first reading) !.H ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI"GA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECT IONS 16.49.030 (A) AND 16.49.040 (A) Of THE RANCHO CUCAMOIiGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PtOCESSING OF VESTING TENTATIVE NAPS MDTIONt ]loved bE Vright, seconded by Stout, to waive full reading of the Ordinance and to set second reading for August 17, 1928. Motion carried uasnivously 5-0. ♦ t b t U. ORDERING THE WM IN CONd8CTIcH VlTlit Staff report presented by Jack Lam, Assistea[ City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the wat_01 for rublic heatioa. Thare being no response, the public hearing was closed. A. ANNEXATION N0. 11 FOR TRACE NO. 13119_ LWAEsn nw nv cmnvv.e .• E. RE9OLUTION N0. 88-49, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE .,LTY OF ILANCHC CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERUG IHE VORR IN CCHNECTION VITR ANNEXATION NO. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING H&INTEILANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACE NO. 13318 i5 i`- 1y^ t• City council Minutes` vd t' August 3, 1986 Paga 11 Ili RESOLUTION N0. 88-498 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TIM WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANTEXATION NO. 47 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND AGGCPTINO THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT 1�q NO. 13318, PARCEL MAP 10941, COP 87 -19, COP 87.42, OR 87-41, AND DR 87 -52 C. ANNEXATION NO. 18 FOR PARCEL NAP 10941 DR 87 -32 AND CUP 87 39 INDUSTRIAL CONIHPL'TALI T_e_ STREET LIGWr.nn_ v RESOLUTION NO.88 -499 A RESOLUTION OF TEL CITY COUNCIL OF INS CITY OF RANCHO CUCA3WNGA� CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT K. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENCINESI'8 REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10941, DR 87 -52 AND CUP 87 -19 D. ANNEXATION 90. 22 FOR PARLSL NAP 10941. DR 86 -08. DR 87 -52 AND CUP STR:Q LOl WRCIALJ: TO LANOSCIPH MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 3. e at RE Dtrrrtes zvs. HH -see '4 A HBSOI•UtICN 02 INS CITY CCUNCLL OF Ta CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, ULIFOi!IlA, ORDEOI9na IRE WORK IN COHDECrION WITN ANNEXA'LL'OX F%. 22 SO LANDSCAP3 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MO. 3 AND AC(73 MC :HE FIRM. ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL NAP 10941, OE 86 -08, DR 07 -52 An CUP 87 -19 E. Amm-rroN NO_ Ae rnA vu.nT ve .e..e --- -.. -._ RESOLUTION 50. 88 -303 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERIHC TUC WOGS IN CONNHCTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 49 TO LANDSCAPE NALMMANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL KUGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13318 NOTIONS Moved by Ring, seconded by Buquat to approve Kesolutioa Nor. 88-497, 88 -498, 88 -099, 88 -500 and 88 -501. Motioa carried un"imausly 5-0. • +srre 0 J City CouncilHimi[ai'��' %"�� =� o^ August 3, 1988 Page 12 F. PUBLIC HKABIHCS Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addraosiag Council morel Joe Warren, 7874 Alta Cuesta, expressed opposition to Cha "no parking ". Jerry Mulnex, 7386 Alta Coastal asked if the Lot" of parking in the park had been resolved. Mayor Stout responded that thars has not boon any formalised plan for the park. Josh Warren, 7893 Alta Cuesta, stated that at the original discussion the concern was exprsased about the safety and speed of the traffic. He felt the City should Look at instilling something like opted bumps to reduce the speodp rather than the parking problems. Peggy Aquilar, 7670 Alta Coasts, felt that this would result in making this more of a through -way, and more dangerous to the residents. Tho "no parking" would present more problems than solutions. Bob Shockly, 7422 Alta Cuests, also expressed there should be something done to control the speed of the traffic. There being no further tampons# from the public, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Councilman Buquet expressed concern about the CHIA report because this was not part of a comprehensive City site survoy. Instead it was a tumult of a drive - through and felt this was just a small thing in the overall problem in the City. He felt this should be held off until after the alignment problem at Had Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill vas resolved because this had an impact on the traffic cutting through. Councilwoman Brown felt this premature and that a more comprehensive package should be done. Councilwoman Wright expressed that thcre should be a reduction in the traffic volume and speed as a wholep then we should look at the parking problem. Mayor Stout felt that the street should not be a through - traffic street. Just reducing the traffic would not eliminate the problems= it would reduce the problems because you are reducing the traffic., but would not reduce the problems. He felt the area should be looked at as a whole. I.' �y City Council Hinutei August 3, 1988 Page 13 ACTIONI City Council requested the following, 1. Look at increase of consistent law enforcement. 2. Look at vehicle code violatious. 3. Rasp City Council informed regarding the Red Hill Country Club Drive /Foothill Boulevard connection. rrsrrr Mayor Stout called a recess at 9tlo p.m. The matting reconvened at 9135 p.m. with all Council members present. rrrrer rte• ;4 P2. COMSIOERATION OF PE09T PARKING ONLY DISTRICT FOR THE ALTA LOMA NICH SCROOL N3IGHBORHOOD. Staff report presented by Chuck Mlackty, Assoela[a Civil Engineer. i Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vast George Caderia, 7363 Carnet, expressed con:arm that in the future fees might be charged for parking parmlts. Us also wanted to be sure they could have a petition of 15% of the block sad could be removed from the district. There being no further public response, Key" Stout closed the public hearing. Councilman Buquat expressed that he did or want to sea Section 10,50.120, Permit Pees, included in tha Ordinance. Councilwoman Brow expressed that Section 10.50.080 Guest Parking Permits wee too combats=,. Councilman Buquat suggested that a sub- co®Lttae of the City Council meat together to work on this Ordinance and other related issues. ORDINANCE 00. 39-C (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.50 TO TITLE 10 OP THE RANCHO CUCANONGA HOIICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS ACTIONS Sub - committee was formed consisting of Councilman Buquat and Councilman King. NOTIONS Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to co.:tiuue the item for 2 "eke. Notion Carried unanimously 5 -0. 'a City Ceuueil Nimitei :. August 3, 1988 Page 14 i` P3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 88 -01 - YERBI1/C8 MBLfHEfl t - A request to approve at annexation agreement for devolopmnt and amaxation of a 96 acre portion of San Barrtrdino County unincorporated area located at the northwest corner of Etivanda Avenue and 24th Street - 4 ^9 216. 071-65. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Senior Planner.` Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Therm being SA raspouse, the Y public hearing was closed. 4i RESOLUTION NO. 88 -502 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY (=MCIL OF THE CITY OF UNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ANNEXATION AGREEMANr FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ANNEXATION OF A 96 ACRE PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY UNINCORtORATED AREA LOCATED AT THE ` NORTHWEST CORNSR OF ETIWAHDA AVENUE AND 2418 STREET Councilwoman Brown stated for the record that she felt this was in violation of the Etivanda Specific Plan and disagreed with the way it "a being done. But, it was a matter of getting this done by City standards instead of the County's so she would go along with it. MOTIONS Moved by Xing, seconded by Wright to approve the Annexation Agreement 88 -01. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (ABSENTS Suquat - Councilman Buquat had stepped out of the room). • e Consent Ordinances Nos. 364 and 365 were considered and approved at • + this point in the agenda. The minutes were loft in the original Agenda Order - nee Items D1 and D2. fee a e i C. CITE MAx=&,S STAFF REPORTS G1. DISCUSSION OF OWKER CONSENT AND INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION. Staff report presented by Arleta Banks, Associate Planer. ACTIONS Afcar considerable discussion, City Council con4urred in approving t) a incentives that did not have any budgetary impacts, and to coma back for those incentives which have a financial impact. a a a a G2. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE G.P. LEDIG HOUSE 5702 AMETHYST AVENUE RANCHO CUCALSONCA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK APN 1062 -071 -08. Staff report Presented by City cc until Minutes 4ugust 3, 1988 Pegs 15 RESOLUTION NJ. 88 -303 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THX CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , APPROVING DESIGM&YION OF 18DIG HOUSE LOCATED AS 5702 AMETHYST AVENUE AS A UnyAlK NOTIONS Moved by Buquot, Notion carried unantsnuely 5 -0. ."tondo wn (, by Bro to approve Resolution 88 -503. { •+, s a C3. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESICHAiICN OF THE FISHER HOUSE 7163 HSI S- APN 227 - 131 -23, by Arlene Enka A's Coot iniad from Juoa 13 1968U AVENUE - r oeiata P]a¢¢er, r aieating Staff report presorted zz5t Mayor Stout opened the nesting for p.tblic coament. Addressing Council was, ;? Robert Plocker, owner of the , y the house. house expressed ha did not want to lope.. o 'f RESOLUTION N0. 88-406 g A 8H80LUTION OF SHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO HOUSE, CALIFORNIA T 716 , APPROVING DESIGNATION OF SHE PI6HER r ICATED AT 7165 SYIVA"DA AVE=, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LANWfARg a MOTIONS Moved by King, seconded by Wright to continue Resolution No. 88-406 to the seconded meeting in 8ept4ober it order to Siva A ",bar of the Cit and staff time to sit down with Mr. Plocker to see if the resolved so the house might Council gbt ba preserved. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. could be Councilman Kitt. "a appointed to work with )it. Plockar and staff. Mayor Stout oparad the meae Masi 'Al Again for public co®ent. Addressing Council Pamela King, 8730 King Ranch Road, expressed her concerns to Council. •accts Mayor Stout called a recess at 12800 midnight, The meeting was reconvened At I2t15 a.m, with all members of Council present. ttNM t t t G4, UPDATE Ob THE TREE PRPSE8VA7ION ORD will be report on the status of future amendments uto �cLa T =aefpresnriatfon Ordinance. r City.Council Minutes ' August 3, 1986 Page 16 (Continued from July 20, 1988 meeting) Staff report presented by Brad Butler, City Planner. After considerable discussion, Council took the following actions ' ACTIONS Council directed staff to obtain coats for the maintenance of eucalyptus trees on both private and public property. rrrr ACTIONS Council concurred to forward said lawsuits to the County Counsel for defame. rwwwl G6. DISCUSSION OF WORKSHOP DATE WITH THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO DISCUSS SIGN ORDINANCE. ACTION: Council set date of August 31, 1988 at 3530 p.m. Planning Departmeot responsible for the dinner. r r r r r r B. COUNCIL BUSINESS Hl. SELECTION OF ADVISORY COMMISSION_ MEMBER DOH TO VACANCY CREATED BY RESIGNATION OF BOB THOMAS. ACTION: Council concurred to let the vacancy rur until December when it was time for reappointmuts. r r r r 112. RECYCLING UPDATE (BROWN). Councilwomn Brown presented an update, and stated that in 2 weeks Council would be considering an Ordinance. Is r r r H3. Councilwoman Wright stated that based upon the embarrassment that the Council has had to undergo because of the historic preservation issues regarding sour houses being designated and no_, houses wanting "hands off ", she felt it 1 .q. > ;4::.L( - City Conseil Minutes h` August 30 1988 Page 17 would be appropriate if the Mayor would send a letter to the Historic Preservations Commission mentioning the Prost and Banks houses for inclusion on the dockets. e e r e e e I. IDMITICATI0W Or ITEM FOR YYII NMTL40 i There were none submitted. i reee +a J. OOINWCATIOW3 FROM THE PUBLIC 1. Diane Williams suggested that the original community survwys be bound and placed in the Rancho Cueamonga Library. Councilwoman Brew responied that the survoy wee paid for by Cal Poly and would be placed in the State Library. Diane Williams then requested if perhaps a copy could be obtained and , placed in the Rancho Cucamonga Library. \ 2. Emmett Posey, 8326 Orchard, Rancho Cucamonga 91701, addreased Council regarding the water prearure above Banyan. He suggested that a moratorium be placed on future construction north of Banyan and vest of Carnelian until Cucamonga County Water District increased the water pressure. Councilwoman Wright requested that a report come back at the next meeting on this with some options. • e e e Y. ADJOORMMBtR' There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk Approved: • ,1 , r� 3 7 i 1 O O n O O 'Y M'r NOOPOP Ne000000waOPwO00n0« w t ^ O N O O Nd OJ P NNdN 01.000NNf• t N.r < n � YntlSOOOP `ooSoaNar -o�awN ryI+NOYI'o 1 i 1 o i w •Oj'1 d ^ +11N rw w r i• � dOPOPOMwNNYPOwryn�OJnOP(al .�: t�rif Y•Pf lOf '�NIiIYNan O yii• NnM00PPNN N/SIN tl Sw N Np /IO NII p ONNNOpi NMpW L yj ~p ~NNNNNNN NIJN IV IJYNNI fVryNSrySSSrySryanSSnSNryN NIV NI'I Y P Q!L tWW N O 7n a o + «rnl�tli ` LWWWUW 2 � 6Y OOtlin�Ordn P1•• wYr UO NIn wlVw wwi Ol ln"IMM n W . <wtloN3nrNwnwryw •+� 22a sea "Jsns:a .J2ISNONZ zNi i : �eSWZ- � °�i3rzi: +N:z =mss ° 3nnl z ae� /000 0 000WenW � c � o 0 0 oNlNil`�e ez Y nW o SN N Y Y Y Y ".tow OYYn YYY '�Qi `Y` Y YI�Yyu � Y 6 0.. U 4 N Yr �(O U N 1 [i It VW 1 V� O F .J( � OtJ{iW OJ yLICVF � WOwO (t <� 1 •1 0 Y w I J „23V�WQ Nn 0Lp6 NIfYL�Ni OFVY « <N > I Y \ � S N OOyZ d�iN w 9FN 6yIn GL'{��On \a >N OI n > Q W qW6 \N N Or < OiSNLO tl 6J MI �l N � N O ON Y 6W �W12il0 YNfLeKJJnaYZ2.O Wn y Nry00 FOV ` V YOn.V YWP I" fJ L }�(rpWwONNt OI n < 0 = OSIW . O N <O7J W� <VOniO `•V ZOWN NLL WS Of • }= JO O 2� 4W UuV n>IY< 6WW�4Y WiwMW � <i�W 00r M¢tw uJ eyN = =N��WWYPSN U V n 0 L V 6 <L�OOGN >Ni6UN2YQVn ^n�i'61Zn6i 2 � O W i O 1 O S W n< 5ii 6 OLN Q < ` 3r ` 6 6 ti Y W Mf�6W 4W6�j Wn�i�J 3 V IrC SfUYi6S «« «Yt <00n�1JW00Y< I^ }1 p JOS�Oa O"wAMPaaNPwO�^nPNnN j C �law0 N.In ry�ry�Na Ow Ni'N 0 V 1 O N Y N 000PP0 ^Ills IIdPSwNS wN0 jww N 1 w w r a 0 I .......l�l....ngoowNNerrywonn rorvNOOeplpnPpp • o .... paorvoo ro9M1n^ . oowo9rFOOpwFOwN°+.00pP SPO paN+o N <1 Y°'0.27/°YI'1P�•P•'°f <O•F4f Nr M.°�NnIOV O°•I/�N w1•Nn/°.• II 4 1 q �i o°$ o° o°° oo °o °o °FOOOFOiouogop °OO °po °o °o °PO P� °pO PPpo �� /°/$$ °ry �N n °ryn/°4 N�I°y rv��M1nn° n�•°./° i•°rnnsrvn °ry•°/NN�•°'/ry$�°/rv�l°Y 1°r n�n9n°/n2 aryM1 u � uW .L.. uii : t+ilu iai Lea W ti � W FF F ys� .W •.FFZy u�.^. �°u ^ i Yiyiw ea W.F. 6 1 QQ ^F Q Q{ Q WQ6VW <Q6♦ QN S SQW OOQ / Q ti!O r f F •t• r�•i. O r '� ••POZ'•wW o= p co0>n u_oo° of o °uo YUrr Y VWi YOUYYYY UY/ Y ^ZYZFYV¢U 1 6 FwJJ u_Ji rV� ¢V < P¢iZi 2 NJ< JY fr W N ttll <JWLWN p =N°W •Y\ ry• 12 b� VO Y 9 S O 4 `p`Y I 21" W >FOO ryF Q Ww < VVUWiM OM1 ��Y JO p�CNVrC�Q / 92u F<JUW � 6W N NN °QL 6 1yM O_iN fW Ui oWUWj2QO0¢Or �° 00 RO¢o{OJ =Q60 4wYtiuY < SYO <O ¢J i < ^�Jr,'n ^ail Jio °ia�oY 33W rNW I:i °NWOQi t <jWtWP ^N Q� ^zV6r N<JQ bONZNn ��YS«r W •Y"'r �EaQ • «N�f <S••Y {iU•O••y WS�Y ^V¢GS°<OQ•i•Z ^<N> oE- Z2�u�.••W°�°�Wi`�s °iu °OWh °i °`iau.^. ^.i i.'.'1.`. •'ii�siW uWwu rl Q<yY VN�> �O�tw (N�O¢3YOiGQYF•¢npNLtir��OFpF i \.�FOwW V pN 7 N W N � W YY J •p. >w�. y V W t! VN N_ O N_ •Zi 6 •Vi O • •1'• WNMN4V •W nti6 � MQ pp <� 2 JY �_ • p JJ < �6y •VnF W� 2•^•Iw N<V wOyN <••JJ �2a V WS�W•ZiU <LUF QWWWZpQ J2 LS�U�N y <r p•Fi•J OpFpty60 6NW�0N O FOO.V0_QQSIQSJ O 1 6JW0 •<•w1<Ll '/NTS <v «OWr�•pa02 YMVOr. C6YGOrpp 1 p <W OuIW Y�F SnYi00Zt <�N trO V {9Z N <W�fNwV N 1 Q p�J •ZOOS ^IVVpON yN1p SW OYN SQJ OWCY•+JJJQiP(< V1NJ2 >• Lsw3' ^6JYSY2•Fn G ° / {OYW UuuW ^�(yJSOj� •J<f<�3 <WQr�J <Z•J•wr {VO� 0 W� 09,pY.;33Y3YYVY V'J (t /�yOpU 1 <•IO WOOpWW9LWYWWWp F NI •• <1 +OrOFOFrNC00lIO PFI wNNNrLryFFplN/INn9N 9.pFN9 W � O••OOV°nOryn.p°••O n01190rPNN+1°Onw A/ONOFNFFwO tlN O / '�w9V••Pwrw lFNwrvw P w NFw9.pF tiNyF ^V +w��N E i i eaon000WervaPP- .onorygeaeooeg^noeooeNennoe ip�pnal�000nnn Pl -oeoo ennoo} ao�ooNONPO �� n �1 NWny �aanianne yl+°•.°•e tiannrym. •°n eoian�n �.w.�eh. °n ��nn ar, .1 r r r Nn °nw w t 1 p01 POOOOOOOdOp�rwwrw rrrinnrvNnnrynrvNnnnnnnnnn•Pi 6 1 Owrrr rrrr rrM wrr..r •.r r..rr w.lr rwrrrrr rwMrrrrr fl an rynrymaaemaaamaaamaaaam m. amaamaaaaaaaaaaa Y .1 ry NNNrynrvnrvNnryNNM1NrvnrvM1nM1M1NM1nryNNNrvM1NI \rvnN 6 1 _ 6 _ NJI" QI"WS >O6 p•Jp� Q_d' J6 S Nu¢.OU6_4.¢i. WO S .mi�6N2 ~ SU Nd <J F"S.Vn2 ^F .i>. J• > O � eW.eiWp001� NOO< Ouw EW O p 00 p 1 V p Y�ysUVUe U Y U <OW UJSV MVryMY U 1 a U 6l <C W`< Tf_1 6p2a2[p mr a LL 6r a¢n JMwir P.pi .2i.p Y VU.SQw V'i�j¢Y¢¢r RJ P.LUP 1 J6pQ NQ }V ^`� O\ JNN�C!C JN66WOW.`I¢¢ �> '� OyNW n y ¢\i��toerW\WWOi %e SNp Vy.. O.• �W <QYYWWp20 VI rOPWQ <p2LyVM ^ewrW�Ql[ SyZFrLl�26 d ^O pYQYQ SII WJrdd NI 6V6 VEW wu' OW_^. W 1� \ %J 6 Zr ^�-�• WSrM�VV.M 1L�UtiW O; rNU <80W wf ^pw0Y0 \LOL {< `wf " WJ L >Oe6� W +Z6uNV p dWylfOtZeCeJYJJQ "Q..W} W OJdp¢ <pY6e¢r0 VOW< NZ ¢i6•Ci�OJ> OJZ y pV 06 N >f ^WENid 61t > <O ^du. <rurOZJW c�°no�u »^. o1WC 1¢.IS i�°. >o°e�.N.a ou c�i�i7u °s iuis•°1 „°. i„°.1°n ".io sib ,si u r a u r i u s • s .2. Q Zr 6 L`V W 6`r W O>Op uuYaWZ O � ZuROV --JJ S Q '• C�utS2��•Q.S WJwW r >Ww OQQ L60 <_S.Ji JZJi d�tQQ> P \\ p r >WV >NJ r ie<^ V Sb. < ZVUTSZYO.Zi4NW Y pr<WWd• YOt `V V6r J <J USa240i TW>WVWU ZW <uL N yl_WJ ¢ tYrh a `O 62�f JMfJLrN «aSL 6.+J :z; { eyQ VOiLN 1< S J •. N6 QtQJ LU� ¢V1Np %> O d�V >VdWdQSSZeN."w'2'. �.Zi 7 JJJ52LtLLt }16 pAVCN ^ j n^MrPennaerrl"aOher lM Ne w..a aN wwra•INNOOPryr.V nl�r P PpOeNNNnaPNrwm rw wl�n rrNFyeNmOmfrNw e 1 �nr.mV .rirNwrywH ^•YirmwwP w.Niwmr�Mnw wr..0 eO�e �ww 3 rA o» ooemooenmrmm�oarmneanreeenaNO »ory ♦eonown 000pom000woa000Fr�oFnanm0000nwrnoNr .�aoeon ♦ i•1 ��00ppNOprmOpOOddwdPnON < dNfVdN ».IM nPpFPPOOJ tl „I♦Vry O�' IOryn» O0rv00 'OOrPWndnaNNmnd�ryren�:0 ^ » »ry 1 OOOMN PO NNn Nd =n »d» Or u ¢ 1 21 < 1 V O O 1 ° »r ♦ ♦♦r----------- aaana!°�r 000ddJddOdhFwwlr. velar FIP.O 61 yr N w .� r »» »»r N »NN »» »» 1 M1ld'�NryNryNNryryryN N,d'IN NNNIO'�•NMNM1NnryNaNMryryNNNM1 NfdY IdYryN V i T;TTT z =Wa=°¢ =c ii o WW %e ¢ V 1 < w\ t 2 1 yW = �Myti M NM`wSwN MN ry wY N^ tt m i xzxFZ �c�F�i�ai �rzii��aFi °n zz zr YW .°.z° i ooaoe o »°°.- oFOON�ooi rFOO oo Is J`i � WOUY YY YiU gU YUr YYNryryOYU Y� 1 y�o ¢ ¢ J t VrF ¢� NW6NM L N NY a< ioVi � < W• 2 <2N < O >N NQwYF N°iQ L W003 ° G O °6xw JtFJY rF�WO» JO� mWS QI oNw Wii 0°Y F'°rIWY�¢GOy,N WN7 N°¢ Y ¢ N �Ni 20 r�cF �ri1Nmo °o �z¢�z �$Fiaff sN �.>u -�'zi6 NI o.J.ii. N UFi n iUVwo�W`zadQ�+a�ri NOYs�ys J°V6WNwxiZ °u .Vnz OI L <6WYN <W IfOOr. �2 JJ <,u WQW ryiw W y F oONNO � VjrWQM2'FN N W\ <6N tJNOa YI n VC O�NF LW UU ONaJt°NZr»i0¢�=J <Y<V ¢ 2 F •�FV6iF e <°SNj }OWOf4W6 �4 px O <NYrNW WON• 0 ° ON mOM oizi �uLJW�WOW Q� cWZS }e g-m NW aF J � aJ�.FFJ of xoiro %W. -NU <Q u»PWOn°QJnW s i w�W$ auN4mW» oNO <ou♦i'W4 <NJN¢NpmamWPxN <+.-�N OZ.. u u T y.F L z i Fs osJ J i � i Zx ° u s 4r °N.JS�o oBa zzz 2 i M YN Vt<JYJNW�W S Q G »W¢OWN >20 iO LWr ¢6t Q N ^¢V LQVN `»PNS <NF�[ WaW�id Y oo¢ 592°n x N" m MNzNO4�°p =J oY< N.W M4. C OV <iW¢xJSGZN S EYi S0 OU a Vi2NN999 . V NL W°}O �° p. . 60N�J }JCJVV > N <S O <N Yt 4KC< NN20O Oy} Y 104ZNUN p°¢¢4VN} WW MO .� %O SUn<O¢FW= 2 <60LJ¢QV %�SN¢SWOOa0m2N < 1iuWWSiU ,l WV<U `uui 2 aF=°Wame o W� ioeaoao�4saisisa s �a�ea¢�ciia¢sl°cNNNNNN�FNN F YI < wP »ONFdNNOOPFnwNnwaPOdrOOryOnrydN N OanO»rn�M1O 6; nOrOndnnndnNnnNFNNJ »N.yry �ryPCO »F rON^nr »NPn O rynNWn M1y ♦nN�+ »NNN yNP N'Or »ry�» NW�A dF { 0 1 Orr _fONeUlp000aOr!!00 aw_ O •1 lfaOwOpUOn0000nOPryww OaNa Q tl • phOMJAO nnQpa�NalnryOwlMn {; fNOn^wwVaa NO aPaONOnra� 21 N O Qj VQ-- OVQ- YN -PNf ^�y��000000 ti nnl+�n aa•o aiaaaaaaaaaaa�vaaa V 21 NNNM1IINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 3 t Z 1 wYwM , r L�2 V•r1Z Lwl Y 554 `YQGB 4 1 z:zz sa Nui Sr ZW F 0000 2 i 6Na ooi ooF i uuuu W s o1W sus u 1 y {ems > •Li•t N� 2�Y ` •Jib 1 >O i N t LRtz F \O M4 iF.L. i•YaoQ Q•Y.• arum {uN ¢•u .. O[4 {INLLOY O W•'•Oh_ �`6O Jy �•'• WL O OY� QI Ff>2 0Ji NI � n ��SJ¢6F N�JLL N .{Mr %yrV 1 �Q M•J J�WW% OOONlZ06.2y >QW1 W_J OI `JNNSNr•V••QU {LLU�YnWfpQ2JOW {•Q� uiil •JN t06eN 2LY Y•W��w2006QUi {QLLFp7i •rnl u OwO SGLL.WX2{W.OV6t•Wna{ 1 6PnPP�Qy O•iiiN <CQ {•[LL NrY06S¢M 1 1 ss> SSY G OOY N 1 p 1 uOiWU { { ^ LLY tti ¢ 6 w F YZO� 4 1 di J Y_ WOYNYi O 6Q 1 SLOG L r WVJWV•• r u1� 1 W••'{•.LL'•.LL {i `i ti �60w YYJ.Si�JtW2 2 1 WU {UN¢W06NN� � •u O.2'••W -�SOV O 1 6 Y rHFLL }r•SiN¢JYY[�1W 6¢•{i•t M�¢i 4sL< 6L� Os'J w i N222Yf QW�>IYN Y NW WN WSQ %NO J ; F »> {OL >W J�WLLYNNJQMJNNw4r 0o f{LNNN•LLi••�i•JUN w1>.IZ- NI¢.soi�iiiiiiie� si nnnpNwpooaaro_nnonel - +NPnP eal awy_nnNnl- nyalnrryryPwryon! •-nnnn r.- annraoaPQrn rnnNr I s a a.b a oxeao ^o�oap:aaeazoo�oxaosna�oa� i� r ze i •^ n °na oY O'a a ..�naa ��n en �•=1un Nn.Ni'In n.'. ,gym ' t„ •,� � mgmn S'n'.ry.� « « ^.°•N �aln n +rfP anoPaa $.'. aWi P Nn P•'•O�mwN ' ii 2 1 ry j` ' •1 Nano '^y ny� .p��y0.•NnfmanmPOwNn +manOPOwNn z 1 eooeo� ryn•.•nnnnnNnNnnnN..M1nN ++ +r 61 ONryryry NryNNryNryNryryNM1ryryryryNNM1NNnNNNNryNryNM1 4_1 aaaaaaa.pOaa0f 0aaadaaaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaaa0a ' , 1 NhNNryNNNNNNM1 hryNNNryNNNNryhNNM1NNM1NNhhNNNNN p � L„ w.•NLi E'w W j^'Y'� : W W+°•�`e ^u YL: y : jwO •r... Q »� .r.•F° �Wti ry� .. r�0`�OM pG ry Wr nl F w p ` Q ; 66• L W6 WN ^6Q Q • `2W `CW`C QyyQ 26N ^N.wW_ U4 {Yrf ON WOr p•�FS F<WNM1O ¢u p s ^a or�eo oa7 Fdp�zp�e oJN<NNO LQ 1 yY ` YY ° WODU`6 YY°Y «U NS SJ Om GO Ou f 6 LNO ONLWp H4 N6 .V Y••wYl tnW M ` =FESJOWVii •ENM1n?ORF 1 l ••w6 W �pN Y K6WW .W2 UQ r¢N¢ i•¢NpCCLy{ W ^ JWW yJ°S1tN LN Y•>'•°0y2 y0.O p a 00S rZ •WV �yai�V 6 < \�7 LOKW \QZG Y�UVSJJ M� ° 6C< °f RW6 {R•�62F�6W N.Wn2 \2<Er¢66i {°� of W slid F••Y. . Nn� .":wos° °r•°.N"�¢o•to°sn�nMnWV�a i 0°_< •� <w OSr6W yWy�p r Nu°V RN6°w6{_n —60= NZU< Wi nn F¢www W V^ tV¢ Q6w <N`0V0°¢J6 6¢QO O ^i ' aWZ mite °meoauN >zo „nan: s.z. •"m°lz`��2 zs *'3.S.o � > � w {pOWL�WJp MY 4 °z °¢p`S �JWpW ° ooh ..msaJ000apNNNnmJWQ iac2N�..L NNNL¢tz i o z Np Ell; < it i U YN rN <wN w Yt 2 � M�° L N° rOL d2 .WL..jLUwn IWNV QUi n { ° � r W i N ay <zu••�N.`. �iaWa•Y..�w F.z. ,¢u'.'e <WaLi O 1 � N¢W �lUOJJG <L ppS ppSWOL =�� 0=� °[�WF.O{1 n fmN T_f nPN nPnNrydnfmdNPwOnf mm�a ^Nna'.N 0 1 .• .afa.. ^P..nNP+f +.nin NrfaiP Y'•NnNayNbm nidN Q r 1• Y' f sQ s 3 z « i u 'u V_ a ^ OOOONNg1ONP00pOgaN00000 _fONOONOM »OOr6f OPq OOgO�'�OrfgOfSPONa40gOePO�OtiOmG p «yia��nN «�P.r °q °m �,PnwlPn�r�P±I�F mnNePwOOot N r r rgaFOPOnMrdry�,r„ryY000 «M «la'1 «'P nO n MM1nnnnM1 nn.... As _¢ nZ n� au �zeryi NW^ nV0 ¢ O Y Ni Jr¢WOV60t Y�, N�MW Y ^WJ 60¢'� ¢ LLVirn rU .LZ4`zW3¢�c �Ka NNC< ¢W �Q __ + @�WOWWrrNN r-w ' ^W: 2 �Qi i,°- JlN J,y 6wJ¢�6n2iM o SO N >MWYpY W VanNOOjiV ao.rrdaWO. Qay'o' E2:,Q- s�o^m QW ~M�cJBe�� =e6€ �s OLLJS ,s JO z yzWq i�i�n.i¢a »i�r z �yio�rz„rW- �<eiao,r�.on °s obi yn, .o1.N�i� g�ry�ZO_<00CNLN0L�_n W W VW_ y Z Z V 2 Yr r0 2 r2ir rye yW N •�_ V LL ppN �Z 1<yJ r �uqi NV fV)'J V�y W M1oC tr W4 Z r <_Z��000N J �W JZ 9 Oy0 in ZON iNO !OQ NQ V 4 u� VVW ¢ • W<W Cpr<rN0< Q N Wry, S zV�QQj z6¢1 FG``iz rUOO _sOj ,Vi.,�nCl <T¢rU'J l 46JYJVYOJM OYS�LL r,yi NWn i_ yONJ_ �aNYWWOeJ F<0 SWO W Y<r6NWMW6J'`•SMJ W r SfC.I <QWrQ 0 q «nW_ J 0 W4 ¢SfOQJ � OW O }]• uoW >z� as z¢y< zrmr Wu = <-. u�>J` a LLY�mao V2<_00 O S <cc<�iWf{ ¢W NNeOaO�"tOViyJ SrrZn rCWY O<Opmt•O 6QWW <� O «sJN •un ¢nziaNWWruoxzo _ }_LLrYLNONOU�"'rOWiYUyWLLdpNp y�60�R'JJ <O ICOO¢J � « O_1<VY<p W Y000VOlO V'f2 ZN <YVYYVVYO']OOrOLWWWLLLL m p' il�OPdOgON,]e�NI NlNPPNairyP�mOglNNnINI ,N", PIOa Q ' PNi�pw Pryr�,q �ngq�lN�r Nfr w,0i _'•'wwrwnryNOwwr_ I 4 < 6 6 t_ < u z P 4 a � 2 Y @I N 1 ri 00l NONPyOwmI0y00NgOn0 <OMh000PNrNnai000SNFn OrNF'f wNNNpOON POhrPar��dPdnIPNNOn a ryM1w =Nl mYe�nnPNS�O.V r^1PNWNn tlmNnFNtl ^NnS NOIaO Y.rwNFI O rnrhP NwNq w0 rN NN r N rww aFmPOwnnlNahmPOrNnINeFm o»��N'a�myorNn la rymm.OPPP��P .... 00000005 N noaaoaa�: oaa.a <aaaaaaaeiaaaaaaaaaa<a <a<a.oa NnNnnnnnnnnnnnnnNrvryNNnM1nnnrvNnNryrvrvnnnnnM1n ! N @N NN W• S O. Sw� ry�� M JL LL W W V hN 6FNWW � <WOWW V � NO rC OhF OFi j =nFr < Ud Qy QOO n N@ 2^ yVf = fP N00 Om OpuW=W5 WVZ: 0j00 m dV <� J .�1hC <YVY VY VI SnitwrY :NCO d i 6m.Jij YNP dOU �ZIN -�h OWQm O m� WiFV �Z VOm WOwWOf ^N 6JORIYXW� yuu11 F Z.Si� 66Vhy�u�Wh @f�ii660Wyy Nr6 ��W @ @4¢JLOU@i �ppMi�6YYi11Wi JCJNULOJ Wul6pQ�S¢O� U06J6CaJa 6mvNOOWUQiHUJtR� Nt�f ON.r.VR SN <NFONwNJ>. Y Q Y w V y V yN n � 2 p W uNi V n •• 'u W y e n " �-" tea � W ¢.N :WWO�a ¢W�� f U y QOyOrmm m WO ^ j y t.w Wi J nn > O B : >fN ! >�� OHJWY7< >r9m �<aNZ<' aP �p 8 <�WYO UOOV.VnlNSg 21h[r0 !> ONr r S=N <N y¢000 <nti sZw rVFW2 OV1t_000!JN M <FWOWVO 3 lN6wOZZ {iX OJOIJN �t CL O 6NrwJMl�J6@ J JQ O jj�N Q XJ Qr WrON J @W<J . tjSit mom Yak 'WJmmFF{ OFF L22't rOrOt ZO fWZW00 OW<Sw «R T °'Smi�r <rrwrun¢JXJXXJJJ <JJ r.�uJ�mYS:zazrusod YI <1 �n�^ON nNO <FNFNFPm rnnrnPOOdPmrf nrFOPNOONFr 4� aOerlpFFpmN lrlhpnPF�FNFNONIaNnamFpFryw m ' dy�NwFyprPyw d.Nlr rw ^r wNPNFP.Fi .Fiw�wNrnw FirwFNP fNy V' YM f, Y• 4 ti ♦ i p < f ¢ ¢ ` 3 g 4 u V2 2 z a i 0 J t t Q ° 1 o °na °Se °n�°v °o °o SaS °aoS °oa °o n PeSaePSNO+v JSS °wa °o an °Wean . ren « °rP- n. °vninPNneg °O°s g g: O°vn na e_ n aP avonnn v aiin rrvrrvr aNnn r n rrr rp r r� N n n an°oo- inn <Nar- aoo..nnJNan°o o..nn <r anJ OO�nnJna nnnnnnnn��nnnn <r.tr r.r +P��NN^nNNN�NNN��a�aa� JJaJdJJJJaJJJJJJJYJaJJ <JJ <�Oa JOapJJJaaJJtJ N NMNNM1NnNNNNnNNNnNNNnNnNM1nNM1NNNNM1NM1NnNnNM1 L.Wi�C - N nl YLN wW W°PW � �°M -� t0" 0 C CG J6 FOMY J it-, f0 <w u<i6� r w wrON 00 Qj� ww Wzrv'i` ztx zM xxu Ny N no°°NN FzxLZN Wow �MU oaa a; «°omi�o .rue rz u ^u u uu v u° uou tuu u uuuu -a.2 M N ° - Nr L w F OaSZY SS �2Y r nII1 Q Q •¢� ¢ N 7{�6II6zPOwNzP n a J n u ¢ N wz« VU 1.7W O° •WoK¢W WWO W 36l N.Ol 2 O\ 0 O O W <¢xW ` J VS w 0 OJQROGO<wPY a` =sr� =�- rQ4«aeiWIIwII<s :QNf6�SWU2<4 G6<V�LQ¢d`tr rO� Ww0l6 -N 6°,° fu¢i F<• yn-°i WV�utiw ¢M�wZ�-°i� <`s QNWLW OW••�� p~nVyN if"J «WwNw O r ZW pp �Sr VW`�SVO »LUni 1+N 2uny • <OQV Q 6wVWR6WVSjZII - arf -�o3¢W - v<. %x- •.zaa�"WU °. �`iwososNeG�m i�- iaoNaiisisa•<P. -W.ao� "o?U�i.¢.i u°.�N »HMO °N.°+z <1'+aim� t 00 0� Nuu3u¢ V 2 L uef¢ o i � We000i u Q•° �N WWv 05Q�YW. -aF iN.- .W.. -ir3 Weue eao�z ryir uu zi .4uezN�i.°- "p�'ia <a.°.W¢ a �Ni °u�u�¢..a it uu�isut �J °�2 °LW� -f <Z sU�J » «: °V il- w1¢i1W WNwMYNM�C�VZL�RfI _r_rpWN p S�VQ ¢ WW <W_WWW W_i pWwr QOO20<V UWJe2WQtZ � V nor V Z • «WOZ �y < sO' ZV)V<� °OVwZZ6��°V'Z n >VVVre�ixrx <Z <�JOS0000• �666L6'f6 CQ6¢Q¢ZN <QSNNNOY OCNWJNNNNNNN ONr laynNnPrJOOnrODNaN°ONPayrNNryf °JI.r«nPN yM1�arNOrpn^00 rnPJryPawfNON P1-P nPrr «yrN 1 r r ry »N »r yayrM1 »MN n'f �MJ »P= ' »r�nNnnnM o! i oe oeeoo e9 snow o p00 9 00a0 . . . NPPSOOP. ... Oryn w1>P rnYr a N y1 ONOO^weNM YOOanOnP n�faOaaP �1 nYn wOP�nnn•vGN wNNwf+•. /p n/PIMnr n ° 61 Nn N r ry N N r G tl n w ZI n < 1 Z fj heperNnf NawOPOrNnlNawepON 2 QI �nnwnnnnnnnnwnn�on°n.°n°nnP+.° zur 3 S 1 •aINNf NNNryNNnM1NMN•alrynNM1N ryIaVNn u I •ac Ji a �} WNry a � � N e�•a`.¢ ¢ w�E ^W 7 <JY nN W •NiJZ O I��NZ I �NNP w�0 OVe� nOenOS .f <O P�2ry UN fW OPwW 1 aV1 _ UNYY LY Wp ONww�Y 1 _ Y <e O <L IJWJSw2 1 nJ•Ly tJtW }N6 Lw <Y <I`•rw 1 PrVItiW6pxWOw�2�WWSP6 }SpP civuil1 1 NS x6¢•V• °i•}aW O W 61 f_nw2 nL�WT;2 }ip6 °wTpp OpWN }C V9P N 1 i• y �G�LLti•Zw •¢u Q•i }y FiJN <UOW6wYONY <� <YNwO 1 V_ w V I < Y 1 V r O 1 2w r< 2 < Nu 3.°. z iii ssu i J {Wut { z 1 ¢ 6 2 V 1 WN¢2 WJ¢ NWw2 W y JW¢ 1 NLN °°N`c JOON Z•'l••Z< 1L�uYwp ° 1 w <F {7Cn .1w N «_u •N+ 1 WW ~F�6 >¢tiw¢W °W6W Ou WSft {j > <WLBNLWOVrNJyZMNN ¢N�¢ ° 1 •iL••wn <WZrr °�F z« <rrr� oW ti <• noonoNnNanwaYNaYwwnPnoYnp msl rvnaoYrrPONnoNaaaaoapNwwwo nro. -•-r a++n NOS- on.- nwaareYr -on al 1 • � o a °o °o o.°•..°n a.N. °o.°r.°r1° -ano oo°uworyol: onaoa� °o Itl•o °o°OO.°. « i i a h „� -nIn ^er.: rrin•+•:n onl=�n orh «nnoo mo ono «r ^vhaan�--n ao NPaoogn N S QI , PryM1 a fry ...f Vh N VnNV is r I a z° •I oP of «nnYr in ePO «nnfNtlhoso- rynrNahaPO «nnrN S QI •°i °.°V M1Ih'InnnnAnn�nr��a �.°i�ifrrrf Vf rY.'f YYrrYif U`1 aOOaaaa a'A aaaaJJaatlaatlaaaaaJaaaaaOJJtlJaaa 31 M1NNNM1hNNhnNNNNryryryryryNNNhNryhNNNnryryNNNNryNNN 1 1 1 FN `N )Q 1 P O W WW Y 22 N Z V 1 p �rM1 hr h W Yw J:! =i Y W W 15!-5 Q .".° •°SQnV¢ wW� C wZ O > °V ZY O PO I YZ Y U YYZY Y wwWMYw6Y OY¢ j «O Ui«2U JdE^Q it YN � fry Ww 1 • hm°2•.V i.°iV �NNr.r HpLLU �� n WWi sW z.. »N.o�W oz mYMW�whn JzW Qi w ° '•io °Q i.Y. ¢ Wqz. o.«i.p •ZiYOZ1�aWSGN O ° eoao a1 IQW °Y•i < °iNJ - N`�WI- f- N °a1- ..°..Wi `•rh..or u.�. nv t��o N WW ZS <iMLO= >NWrS`NNOOWW WI O V h 2VMhw0 WVtWh >�iOh2NU.- .SN6Yf 1y.Pghwy J <VY.p<r „.<.W•.WPQ6<Q Y Qf•N RK ... p V V60«Nyp pNp NU2i 6 « 6 �O.°•yi1 WSLNW¢wS.wh wl W .Si�CVO�� OJW >�ppjjn00- 6»N <t•.nWWSS I s C {VOL�O <LJV�ONVZP6NOiLZN000J 1 Y N «o V r Q w V O « ^ Y zz z °oz . 3z o si o z aN -o Y of a U.. t-” .�. .Y. r.N..N. i°c z..z. s •'W^ z v via N.Y.. i W ^•. VQ V_JW rf. V <SQaYtV NZi6 =W N jy z v o iiu oWfivBiwvew °vuz-- ¢.zuo 9•zim.°. oUg O M J > ZW pI{•N y1 <6 W� O«� r.<.. w_l_m V3 sN J¢ °<L OWiJ6•V••Yn .Y.VY6Wp� m¢OW {yyM�rij O <W <SZW S O >Npp6 p[ �joWWWNUwNNfZC�O «JJJfML, O jrNJJw LZ iN {WJOO•j 1<Z CO 6 V 6i <4W tN < {t « { <mOmmmNmmVY�YVVYYV nPnatlYnM1 h..hnnmhPmPma- p pl n � NYarnn „PhN PM1OnhPM1nM1POhrytl�nm «tlYM1O 1 •. m •. = naP ^.mi w.OiPPwnY .hi Pw•Oi °.mi P m ma 1 n n w II 19 :i 1 'F k e'. w 1 OOOnOnmYYNOnPOmpn°m OOrwNfOOnO OPOnNN0000 0000aanNrnoo +nnoann�ooprn00000�omonnr0000 w 1 SNO.�pf.�ryOf OraP��n O�FiON�ry.rNO ^IOSOONNnaNtNPO < r�rmnParyM1a wryaPwNan n ONmnFap +^YP 1 O .•OYO of .• YN °OPFnnn aQ � +N r N N .• ^ N nN 1{ a 3 z si anmPOrnnYN al- mPOwnn +N al- ePOwryn +NanpPOrnnYNa NNNNnnNnnaaaaaaa L vN Ni Mni inir +iiaf rf rii�ir++fY +YYYYYr.iY +fY IL ti� fan+ - ----aryaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaoaaaaaaaaaa 31 NNM1nNFrynFnrynNNhM1NnryNNNryFryryMNFNNN Y I y= I mLiWC YI'pN � W i W yO uLLiVWw YSI `Y 1 •. .w'I< %w< rw O ww w < �amwW �w w oo. ° z u «¢II'a<�waw 1 Jodod�ci weWNwa`v s oo°I o s= "ooJ Co. `o ¢YYUY•<iYUINiI °IN,IU ° °uu °. uu'WU ol`u °uu° u f 6 °N� �1°I-NCO Y O N <6wY' CwW1p6P V 1 W 6dF O i p ZOS <M1 iNd Nl..r u o aNZW a WnWN i x Ild^ ¢WSry3 N od¢NW� nw f� I.W N N2 J f P $ o u W Q i< % JLnw VOJS• YLLJY rylNpwn¢ry w W OF ¢ I a O} nJ IC 6 4 J {♦F �Y .I nNL •Q OtW y QiY S x a6 <O JJJ6 i Y O QW Q aW s rm <mw uaw aN oursuj J ult�ss� <s I` vaQ uW } {wNiWUU ILLS ILI.i IS.ars�vl�:. °rvl¢ -iQO1Y I°a >i¢iisWU.Y.Jw �Iw.¢zw J.`.WSwjcz 61NLII.°.W 1 oui�a4 i�= QO6s�Iti•W+sii�dse�I��III'�z'S a ss °i �.�is °a ausi.�i"�� w i Jm LJii.u. a`i %W < »i °u i,il$IOII�iI' aubiiw >oY'ILL irQ -us57 alo- �J..4..I'I� u ¢ u u d z izi2 z yyIIQ¢V O Q¢r r QJ Syy Y ••YV pa O p3W"IW .SiVpNV 3YN VO0wYV tN13¢i10¢S V LL � g33r�sS.ii��Y O rOSaOw GIa.U.N <Q °4 Q l WO 00¢rN0 S `UV¢6n•¢YOO<J r4%6 W6 O OaYVVCQJN. OM Y L O F�Sf < {YI°n0¢OONS .............. VJ <6 pL QO d_U_d_OSYW OVN _ Ct 1. {W6wd .�< >YVt M I V {4L >SWO W2 LLJYw�NOfJ ¢WpwfONwO� 1 20000 00�2¢W WO <{ < � i'32 SaY¢ 040NGG ii 4' J <. NY Wf }OyWn°i SW °Iyo WUwV¢w =z NWWYWwO w ¢duxJ 1 YVUVUdLL }F•Q Waw�•..VN` 02WOL2W¢WU`V JL06Y1 UYLVYVVOS nO{ mO�OOI ¢iIOWWLI�WLLLLLLO�U1102Z2N22wuw }1 41 P'nnNwPPrt ar ^NFwnPnn°n +paNOY1•N nrnr°wNPFNN >1 mppmnryn +nly aOrnnnNVM1FPwONOnYINPI•N aPPPp a 1 O^ w ° ^O ^= w ^OaNNMnI .• =w j�nr =wjPa rr �mOP 14 r I I 1�I tloroa oo iNnnooennProoronoonooporoPrrrvetlrvo F PorOronorvaoatlnonnnootlo�PO foonotloFPrN°nFa� nryS�nG•N „+� „.•F OOPO�OdOCOONOMPOPhfrOrFP P�h <1 NrOCCN r.'OPrvnPryFr OfPnnn�nYnaaPannNn t O Q j NN-• r ll < 1 Z° 1 OPO.•rynf naFaP pp••N nfOaFOPOrNnrNaFOPOrrynrndF ¢1 �YdrYrYih hl .hh000000009tlpPPpPppppp00000000 s 1 rrrr rf rf rrrrrrrrffrrfrrarNNPNNNnN 1 NN• dVryNnNNNM1M1NNryNM1ryryM1ryNM1ryrynryNM1 •aVryNNNNNrvM1NNNn V 1 •� s 1 0 � uW •W� i•L•••`.1 ° a i i ♦ a, •• > hw a w uww Q° oQ ¢ P^ e.Q••g °•¢ •'i• iQ E = z Fan ¢ Ea 000 E W ` � °dW�Fi�Fo 0 4z � z4 Wyii of o nP �o °•+ ar -o w Y a oo ` WuJ •4^u o un�{{`w'o\ ru aiui uNa °uNiw °a o °o •` -i uu o 1 620iNW OYrCLL�� JfV 4 <uWtyJW EO WnOIOY O i M•Zi=yY wuii6f Ra � O E JP•Ein Zn �460-. <LLµ�6i �JN IO° O U °aia iV NN �NQ••Qa 1 U622 *02CLF �4° \N SNy�Zd`ah46�Y26 <YO•°'•02 O 3 W 1 1 zwWwhJLLW :e.•B.. Wrodam.°. iz ieSddWCZ ` }aJ LNOL c•a.NCa•<••Y 4Nficw WS OV ° %.L•O F�E60µ_IF4¢hY0Y0�f }fF YFZOJ6�•f[NOQ4 1 KNQUuII < SWWOM4 fZX wi {L «L•i. r_FFw «u6 U1..'y•..N 1 �an60 J6Y 16 WNµ ••O <WFJJ Wi4r4 Opi iP mWN _ i •- LWF4VJ oWµ4W06 OW��wOWO LI � QZ N ¢µF2• Vw}OiW O Z u aWr .e i�cLLN� �W``•`- -.°.a Ei•ztes 6WN•. 4a26µ2 <•- L4hLiLLii4a0l� 10 �iWWWw ahrWahWNO0¢J naoeea <w <WWraoz eo ziNNNQrFNZOOPNtlJO4uou -. J•,•N S3cJL¢¢o4uu�`s r{-• } u0• Y < 4 N O zu W< WS OSF W w.. y in > z J sa � <0ti�6 6 Sur • r QQ� S 6W O° Wu ^•V.•F rNJ 0 yLON V - WV •� r:Wezo�i aici N No oa S NrY <6 `aµ O a• ^L V:VOi66 JN�LSMOr.Z -80 SCO __ NY�•OµWO YO iwWN 60•'.SaE 6� <OUwWY l NL t o O WWO Y0F 6t6 O¢nUw4h � 40LNa F__W•• 1. �� O <uWWWMWOJJVe4�6 \NJ4 1 �Z V ! F 2aLLLFL }J�Ot <FZ 6M� }< �S °�i•W� WO \JNr��whW10 a <Zif6JO= 0W= W6y�0 „EM `• S j v o•n¢O Y �JOLM E<- <i vF i LL + Z 1 F.i.FF «�za••i }t uz. •'•1lu cQ• {z FuWr`j•• - 0< u °4Q Uw W I ('Y•[Y`J JaJJJ.•LLL��•ii•�L;p ZVLyZ20pOn6ai66n YI n <1 tl OrPFOrnryrPNOONFwd fFOOPnnndFOdC.•O hPF• -O.•O 41 �OppOFN r••P OOFrOn�p NOhhrrtlry00wfOrr...•O nprywOrrO O 1 .OiP .Oi = =r r.Ni »Ptlry =dr .Oii Ow0a0yw�.0iw ySNPNrh�nd � f L t C< t r o J V ° ■ J aeooeoeoao orb.. ...o.. ..............oaoeooF hOOPOa00FF0 PFOOPFf PpFM1OnafNOnOaONe00r♦ •P rvYONOrN�y�h nPC w�ONnaOnOF V�IiOr.pp +ry OlV�Nr•PO FPPOrF ^^VYVF ^OfP «wn N»OVaPwP ^PN GG PVryrvN ry •. T N OFP« P a « n a NP •• n w PO ^NnfPaFPPOwNnVpaFOPOrN nfMaFppO »nnVNaFP � „•.••wrwwwr•.r nNNnnM1NNnnnnnnnnnnnwlVf VfVVVff NNNPMpnNNNNNNNpNNppNNNpNNNpNNN I'°•M1M1F nI'VNM1M1N nI°'In NM1NnNHNNNNM1I'aINNNryNNNnNNNryNNNN s 1 1 NM 1 00 Cwt X004 N -F W_00-OOM •.q OQ NS rF 1 UY QOWOYYN - �L YyYVYW PY SY 4V 0°L i W �c`ers at s "N¢8 » F -�Fai Fw <usu 1 2 MV uW U' ozW Ln yP f .-s'�W <uJJN p Wri • »LF ¢¢ Ot >y PWj�j VUY <p11¢uuNJ� f VI V NviW�WNy2��¢6��ppi2'¢�¢VW °OM° OVgZeNJV»•W 3 F,. <W sW'"23�..po�� > :'O..y.�Ylo.°•` .S : <��3ob O� G SSr�WWV W i JWOLYWN >W F6 t°J Wi WiNVJOOi�NN�¢W. •s- 9aJ »¢czJx¢�.IFaWQ Woo nu QO Yy<OfJJ »WT OV ^WWV ¢yy 6FQOi »a¢O < }Q6 SO 6M ¢<pNP CVSV< V6Y-J• -1 N` � W rJ�w ^` <��yyaYVP1�1��1rP °NLiQCVw`F�JJ {M{ ��...rr W�Yw 1 VLLw LFwRWPQZP >•OwM LMMOPranrLr�p��VUY3sN �•Wn6 •• 1 1 pppp 1 y ¢ W YVVVVV» V f Zy = L S Mp00000 O r6 -¢� C » � WWwWWWO C<j uxi Q Y¢LVJZ 0 uN.Vi 6 W �LL�ru°WwNaaZV ^ u°i L W »° J Vhf ° `_ Y061 O »» N « <l «ttWV -•UJry•Li WWCWJ O ' <NF�°_O¢ •6< U� YVYYVVVO N 11 >0 O _ }__ _ OWOH»NQJ 4J �e t¢� e» �� e¢9 Q¢ &Q9S Q3 txc e¢ zurWWWWWWWyJ< oc�o •�a oWo .N• i z cx aaWWWP Ns sxxzxszP>¢us. -WO W °W °O NUQ >FWW 2�2 F�FFFFrFw OF <° YNUFNF S9W,: VVYSSJVW9 •J'J00 J SOYHYW W•+ GGW (i z <°W..SO�oeonao'b9WWWNOQ¢ yL.. 0 ¢ R�L ,Q¢QN »NN,L »rN »NN » »N »NNF -FF,nF 7'9�J9Y W� 1” i r PaYn °.P.00 °oNFONO.N.00.°. °o °n Fi F.,N.,°. °«aosofa �nnwnn °Pines ° � � r��ayNw«$y NNn �"JNnnnnnnn^nNwPPOOn Nf NypNf i4 ■ •i 1 nVOPar•• yl oaonnNr a •1 r u a 1 < n 6 f 1 w Z 1 r u i o a ro•.. non � Naa i; <a.aeeaa 3 S NNnNMNN u f( O � ii WC \L V i .� i a sarca 1 2 Z ::: I• 1 w o � c ooJo � u uuuu a a< 1 V J < 6N 1 uJio° JuW`Nwz ci W i � z YOYV tt2 1 °N %Wf.2ir i 1 JWVw6 <� 4 WW� JJM 3 K OOu O iSJ J.2iSV VY 1 Wf NS 1 JSwOJ 1 JZ %f JJW O j >if �SN <� NwNnVO.. e °1 non °nPn a 15 AM � | ! � |,| !"!!4!a!! \66 I■ / ■| .| ��!!� - _- ! ;! ;! | | ! � /J1 '_ ;CI COSa�C ^_"a ^aAR�R r `SL=== SCRrd_= $GSFfS= RASC= as..LA e `eI gal Ee_E °!a!E °EeRe°_ e e EEC £E gs�s�s -�9 =� • aa._.ss_z_3i�4si._ aaB_s0.s.3.c sc3?ccc2d.s !9I 03�9pSE$l s3io��¢ sAx $ir7959?'S$3= 'SS.B$!+fi= 3£npCe .J.. JJJJJ33Ji3i1JJ d.:iJJ.:.:Jd:iiJJiJiJiiidJJw� i3 3iT$!? iS0$$$$ 3EBd7S$ 3 $RSE?$$$S$$$$3$k$8$$C?$d$l3Ed3E ��I3if�49�v$ i033t? �3$$ $$i0fi9$$�3ii$$$$AE$�A$9$iSQ$x5$ ^^ ��- rJJJJJ13J. 13JJiJJJJ ...:J +iiJJJiJiJAi1:Jr�1 b caas asst= sasssssassssssr :sasassassssxsassaasa 9. ### #t#### fill # # # # # ## � it8csaio�i�eafff #ia�siasii£dieei£d8s£d£i�Ef�e� a! saaasaaeRSCa* srssa :assscassaasassaaasasssas :a # ## # # #I # # #� #3 # ## ### #_ �! s£ af£ zso�_ RCZCS :ps :ga #isgaieaisliassszzz�cSes btl� ssasssse= sasasssssaassara :sssaassssasssassssz sasss £i6i:�i£�Si�i£�sE£siiisi�ssa das £sia�si£s es- :a• ° g e$ as s as a c^ = c= �_: 3aia ica: 33a33Eoc��s '33s3;sSaR3s @3s�a #33� Mfg �!J� P #b r�n ryb QQ yn ■e ■e q?8i�P3 y� ■e te3S�V- _:Q� #G °l� {a 5 Raiff 1�{L?�# Ci bY�9S13��1aa1SSS .R-..-- ..L -.H90L �b{�iI Y =exVtSEW Q113S� � I j iiZZ29 a 9 Y 5i iii b C | �- !�! }| | _!| §. , !� f |, § || | | | |IU || 9g@e9ge5� .l•.,.- ,.�,.��,!!l• -. =��e 2a52S2Jy5g2g§ gq�gqqqq\ 2��ffq�#ff|q|q |\ k ggqqQ 1Ai37igq q ..1.,�,1•..1�.�.,�! -�- --- `.�1.• =.• � |q |ggqqqq\ 1..,,..•- •!l••.• ! 22#|gq&2gq| ,,._••,.•l,.••• - -�! !1!02 ' | :''�, ■! ■ ��2 ;,`�■!! ■ | ■ |�!� ; ■`B||!�� | | ||�i§ �! |�] ; | |!| |! | ; | ■! i§ | ��`• �� / oil / /q, ��2��h2 | | ■; ;! || | !•;!!.�-� §■ ! .! |�� ■ |!�� | | | | ;le = - =!!! „ re � \ | |2 | | | | | | |! |!! |! | ■ | | | | | |! I% | | ! 4 y b I ' =9 d3�eaig�a�?3d333 &cddc'3 == �ccd$5Rr3caii- -a33kx =- •• �s d��aaa�F�aE�EaisEcsc�zsElsE ;� ° as is E ##EEPEE - 131 !L_ a, i8' s�39:= ?aEi9 'c3? ?33 =33 §cczx- aE99aT0cc'sd _g _. didEl ttlAddiEd is _?idt?F5gx3ESi.Fid25kl &FESdxEEd 5 F :- 3iAfE t�: iddd=, t8?3Edi�gp3E?�� {gdDgdl9kESRg0i,18 =Ed -a 22l r.l E23i22ii2Yfiiiiiii2iii3!2 iYEEiiE82S a itt 2 �i iE�r�ila ca's isle£ {s diaidsscas£scdixci =iisi£ c � !� Y� saao_sa: sass sasssEas :: :sassaszsassasssa :a x a a [ I## ?# iti➢ # #3FIIfill ## #E # #d#####1#i #g # # # ## # # S S YI =f�S?ttc tat?= teta'i_E ettECitieeLSYtLttietei ? # eke/ �a,9 -I aEErx!iSEEi!lisE2EaEa SSaii aY2aE82iEYlSaS3 A E 3 # # # # # ##>i # #B #I #t# 3( # n trg r�i Esecseedda liceiedtEisdt eEc [�ci =22saa s ! v c as E�az�=aIICaaE�3 c�83EEi�?' -d i?��a`== ec''== xt.�ss _ � ir��ir3r =c:: 3c.x2z�asc= cxx.rcr�rc3sd.33. 3 Mai ISM tl tl 1 tl- 3g3tl- tl g tlatl Al Z tl5S5ly tlG5 -y 3g-- 6-E -5- S-111- ig :i_631- - �3g@@= g�3B_33�g253_�S:tlg j3 -i i � EG:Iwr g p b� d•�-�-8g-�-& 3 R �!�geo � c- _e � 2%1g Y S2�.3�7 _sPtl3.e E' ■p C' ebpy7v�YHis, e d OIg N G O g r 3 # g cYc tl g 19 � r e Bp'' sss�' siisisLSas- " :isss�iss6s'sissi£sas�is #s a i, F Y G Y= eq e Qa E!EERp EE��S aY i3c�i3 �5::�3 cc3�aifl == 3zi3 : a =41 iii -i.: iii�lii�J iii p s =YLS =s c ssssss x s:aR�nzsa s ggag - e z CI 3 #di�� 't �i�4�d @ lia�ii332 c =r3S ? c ?P ? ? ?= t IAVF g i! 35- 3=_BSaH ? 2?33 i j sasas: i s :asaz s sssaaasss s —SR7 = s i 91 taliii II iiiM ! tI ?ii #iii II 4414 ;i IIii333 3 i�it�� i 33z:3?33i3 E izd2 S 3 3 =CttG -i t iiiiE8 S L:aRFRYBR i LQia R R E n ? #; if3i d ii�iii r. tEaYSE?i3 E ?.33� ?e' 33[3839 35 °3?R &3R i £ivi i - $ gapsaa magsa� egscipgca g ^ga £ : i i 9 i:a_S 8a:¢u s: :3 3�s. ? ie =r :st : _ . ihlia gIQfiff999 c 9 gg c�c ign H�163 �d lS88� u B j yybi¢Ql i� �p as pgy$Q�9�i�yia�ia g ii999iSj��G4�y� is MA L^ A_ 9isiss$ :3a i3s ao ppv i� 3 w �Qy S ■ E � / �| § ! ' \ 2 !\ ■i � ; : � || Ek 7 ' ! . .; at � t| || . I ;| | | k ) | @3 » !| «£& �•; ; � ■ . ;- � n f\2F /� a E i 6i }} , �s■ \� A= ;i9m |e „ ||i |||� ||i | || | . ! !..••! `!- '! ■ § ° § §!!l.., - !!!•M ! : °!. . - . - -- _ - !! ||�| | ` ,__!| |` | ...!! ) ; ; ; |§o |Awls 1f9§ | | |2| | ! | |! |��l, ;; Z ; ; |� ■ � | | || | ■�� ■ ■| | §| . ; §| , Psisa |;I|| } | ;| | | | |! | |; | §| | | | § |■ , ! | � ; �� • ■ | | t. \ \� / \ .{ { � ; ■ ■ ■ | | )!i all , !!! � . JlMi .� fill !. ' ■ | ! | |, § *Doi ||||§ ■ | || | | hiff! ! | | |2 ! | ] | ■ ,� � | | ■ � | | | ■ f 2 3' 0 i -- .�_4VN T•1 wry" "-r l° -- .\ •�. - LAVAS 2219Ea S'.E .rw.- JAM1aa w1[aMOIK rn w- R lc o w6 :: •� r.a.6.rR.Ci[ .l : rw T ~°!r' •PC wY t, tmu ar'r.... ! lOIroO9t r�4.+Y,.rF .a�y G.y,6 !� O.3 41MrA1 I I+t ND.•,. .=.�rr. ~' 4tlnq flee ^. � A— br��lwrr CODE 36:3 rwN - 3. tlArA3TO Or A1nxoam die/ . 3 A Auyicn FIC. 4rS6wr w./r S.A. 704 Q _ 6 .TO. 1 imta W RAmma" q r.^I M�FyF.NMw. N �. Ak+tde QIwYYM iw '.!�.. �SY,\` _.Yw ,ww Y •.. =.•. � .� .mow w •....... rY �Y i.r.. 4 .w. .. ....nrw..F \tl � IuFt ryrwMr.wrw�.rY..F..r ♦iY r.Yw. ti4.w tir+Wrrr..rr IMIICt.YlON RY ri4HStIROR — tl STATE O CN1IOrtu twrry .+ ..r. r..... - ....ti�....�..�. �.......�. �.. �..�.. r «......� .µms........... .1 . r. K �w`i. N r. M t 4 . F wl�.� . Yw. _� r✓~ � . �Y whrr vwFr ......� •.ter. L. ....r. yi. r, I �: 1w.Yrn w�w.d fs.w - GM>:•c.er w.r Oe NAT WNrr biro rMr 3Aw, FM AeTWtyY, UM�•. 3 Rr j Yrwq C r�wr rwn nYi, r WWI M- LJ I E I ic! a5 v PEPPEFr3 Loom* 9740 uth 3L Runfn OAUMr4k-Gk pmoi* lo,wrw" 70)sd NEIGHOM ODWMEKM ii0&tW, P-" w- 14m U.'Msdm~ RmWK" 1444 OL?S/AO SOU09 Mwan Raidentid 4-U DUSIAO Ent MKRC.H416h ftWOKAW 14-24 WVAO vent 10MA APN 202-4I-0 BY: &Raitraz 4-e-M LJ I E I ic! a5 v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT _ A5. DATE: August 29, 1988 TO: Cicy Council and City Manager FROM: Eliza�dth Stoddard, Finance Manager SUBJECT: GANN APPRMIATION-LINIT MISION RECONIENDATION- City Counci` adopt the Gann Appropriation Limit Resolution as recomputed by the audit firm of Lance, Soil E Lunghard from the base year 1978 -79 to the present. GACKGROUNO With the beginning of the 1988 -89 fiscal year, Staff contacted the City's audit firm and directed an analysis be completed to insure the City's base year (1978 -79) appropriation limit was calculated as specified by the legislation. The resulting Resolution will re- establish the correct amount as the baso year and henceforth require each subsequent year be re- established. Respectfully submitted, A4.1-"A- ElizaiWth Stoddard Finance Manager ES:cp Q /n A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. "CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING THE BASE YEAR APPROPRIATION LIMIT AND EVERY FISCAL YEAR THEREAFTER, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION. WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the otate of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of government for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in said Article XIIIB; and WHEREAS, the Finance Manager directed an analysis be completed to Insure the City's base year (1978 -79) was calculated pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Californ ia State Constitution; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, AND DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, that it is determined the base year for purposes of determining Article XIIIB requires re- establishment and each subsequent year be re- established as follows: BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS: TOTAL Total of all appropriations Encumbrancev Reserves) (audit report) 5422,841 Remove items not subject: Less apprp• not subject to limit (1,777,682) Less Ron- Proceeds of taxes (1,062,340) Less deht service appropriations 0 Add Excess User Fees 403.675 APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT to LIMITATION - BASE YEAR (1978 -79) 3,777,483 Computation of 1979 -80 Limit: :PI Increase 10.17% 384,170 Change in population +9.94% 413.668 1979 -CO Appropriation Limit 4,575,321 Computation of 1980 -81 Limit: Per capita Increase 12.11% 554,071 Change to population +lE 70% 651.433 1980 -81 Appropriations Limit 5.780,826 21 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS: TOTAL Computation of 1981 -82 Limit: Per capita Increase 9.12% 527,211 Change in population +4,93% 310,986 1981 -82 Appropriations Limit Computation of 1982 -83 Limit: CPI Lncrease 6,79% 449,432 Change in population +4,29 303,237 1982 -83 Appropriation Limit Computation of 1983 -84 Limit: Per capita Increase 2.35% 173,235 Chanqe in population +2.00% 150,899 1983-84 Appropriation Limit Computation of 1984 -85 Limit: CPI Increase 4.74% 364,782 Change in population +3,01% 242,624 1984 -85 Appropriation Limit Computation of 1985 -86 Limit: CPI Increase 3,74% 310,541 Change in population +6,20% 534,054 1985 -86 Appropriation Limit Computation of 1986 -87 Limit: CPI Increase 2.30% 210,400 Change in population +12,43% 1.163,227 1986 -87 Appropriation Limit Computation of 1987 -88 Limit: CPI Increase 3.04% 319,852 Change in population +9,00% 975,717 198748 Appropriation Limit Computation of 1988 -89 Limit: CPI Increase 3.93% 464,409 Change in population 17,67% 2,170,129 1988 -89 Appropriation Limit a� 6,619,023 7,371,692 7,695,825 8,303,231 9,147,826 10,521,453 11,817,023 14,451,561 ` Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT +'.. DATE: Septemtce: ", 1988 t' TO: City Council and L.'ity Manager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager ' '�• SUBJECT: FINAL 198748 BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS RECOYIUENDATION: I :. "*„� Approve all final 198748 budgetary adjustments for the Special Revenue, Capital F. Project and Debt Service Funds. BACKGROUND: As part of the fiscal year -end close process, certain final adjustments are needed to account for accruals that were not anticipated, but booked as part of the year -end closure. These accruals are necessary to properly account for activity that occarred In the 198748 fiscal year, so as not to burden the resources of the 198849 fiscal year. These final adjustments are Included and will effect the June 30, 1988, financial statements. Respectfully submitted, ! �, 4L4� Elizabeth Stoddard Finance Manager ES:cm aq , ._ ;, 500001 +� APPROPRIATIOnS si •p ;. Increase Decrease '- Gas Tax 2107 094fa7 p ��- Regular Payroll 80,000 rt 1200 Overtime Payroll -10,000 8702 Local Street Rehab 55,000 a 8703 Local Street Rehab 50,000 " e 09 -4991 9000 Transfers Out 195.000 ' u Net effect on appropriations 0 ". Gas Tax 2106 114637 w 93 Vehicle Mint. 6 Operations 126,000 8112 Hillside Reconstruction 4,900 ;t. 8113 Turner Avenue 6,900 8617 Baseline Road Widening 8,200 8104 Residential Street Reconstruct. 49 000 Net effect on appropriations , t Land lhtntenance 038 Medians 46 -4130 8021 Water Utilities 300 Net effect on appropriations 300 Light District /2 Residential 56 -4130 8022 Electric Utilities 1 100 Net effect on appropriations , Wight District 03 Victoria 57 -4130 802r— Electric Utilities 4 000 Met effect on appropriations ,000 Light District /4 Terra Vista 58 -4130 DOl l— Assessment Administration 4,000 Net effect on appropriations _ 4,000 Benefits contingent 73 -4265 2050 — Employee Benefits 220 000 Net effect on appropriations 220:000 i{ T APPROPRIATIONS Increase Decrease " Benefits Contingent 73- 4265 ^' - T030 Employee Benefits 220 000 Net effect on appropriations 0, OM �t AD 84 -2 Alta Ines Channel 'r.. 80 -4637 a ° Mir— Contract Services 10 000 Net - f'tect on appropriations 16:085 AD 82 -1 6th St, Industrial Area 83 -4637 "^ w TOO— Contract Services 3 COO Net effort on appropriations , tdz ' AD 84 -1 Redemption Fund 87 -4637 9� Payments to Trustee 2 200 000 Net effect on appropriations 2:200' ,000 j; r PD-85 Heritage Improveaent 88 -4532 6028 Contrdc: Services 30 000 , Net effect on appropriations 30 PD-85 Redemption :und 90 -4532 3 0� 0 Maintenance 5 Operations _ 1 500 K-,t effect on appropriations , AD 82 -1R Reserve Fund ' 94 -4991 9000 Transfers Out 6,000 _ Net effect on appropriations 6,000 AD 86 -2 Redemption Fund 96 -4637 3900 Maintenance 8 Operations 2.121 Net effect on appropriations 2,306 3j w N I 3z INNIS Y :Y ESTINAITD REVENUES _ • •:f; Increase �� in st 11 -3900 Interest Earnings 5110 State bas Tic 2106 . 65,000 7 Lien Re Pt7!egts 35. °0° 11399[ 0o,i 91 Transfers In 195 000 Net effect on tstfm3ted Revenue ,000 '.j e 3z E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager SUBJECT: 1988/89 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS RECOMMENDATION: s� i'{lr r nn 5� i �1 Y Approve budgetary adjustments for the Community Development Block Grant Program, General and Special Revenue Funds for Fiscal Year 1988189. BACKGROUND: As the budget document moves through the process of initial preparation to preliminary review and to final budget adoption, numerous changes and revisions need to be made within individual departmental budgets to accommodate the wishes of the Council. As the budget moved through the process for the 1988 -89 fiscal year, several changes that should have been made were not incorporated into the final budget document. These attached appropriation amendments reflect what were part of the preliminary budget, but not carried forward to the final budget adoption. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Stoddard Finance Manager ES:cm Attachment 33 s n• C APPROPRIATIONS ESTIMATED REVENUE I .' 34 Increase Decrease increase Decrease . °V GENERAL FUND 3 01 -4125 EmergencY Preparedness 3 500 Capital Expenditures 3, 0 ;r Met effect on apProprtatlons t COOG �— 28 -4333 Administration 343 8193 Senior Shared Housing 6,300 24,171 ar 8811 Sierra Madre /Placlda 17 528 8812 Avenida Velar Met effect on appropriations 0 , fi BEAUTIFICATION 21 -3901 � 60 000 fi0 i Net effect ontappropriations CAPITAL _RESERVE 25 -4285 Tom- Capital Improve. - Bidgs 125 000 YL 00 Met effect on appropriations c LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 41 -4130 60,000 3ffr— Loan Repayment 60 000 8769 Victoria - White Alder Net effect on appropriations I .' 34 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 30, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: TUITION REIPMURSEMEq RECOINERDATIOM- The City Council approve a reimbursement of $900 per fiscal year. BACKGROUND: In June 19e8, the City Council implemented a tuition reimbursement program as part of the labor negotiations process. At the time the program was implemented, there was a total reimbursable amount of $450 per fiscal year. The policy establishes that the City will reimburse employees based on the average cost of units taken at the local state universities. The staff has conducted a survey of the cost for 6 -units or less at the local state universities for the school year 1983 -89 (September 1958 through June 1989). The survey reflects the following fees: Cal Poly Pomona Cal State Fullerton Cal State San Bernardino Cal State Los Angeles $189.50 per quarter $338.00 per semester $255.00 per quarter $211.00 per quarter Annualized, the semester /quarter costs average $660 for 2 semesters or 3 quarters. Additionally, parking, lab fees, books and other miscellaneous costs can total approximately $200 fcr 2 semesters or 3 quarters. This brings the average total to $860 for the 2 se,,_sters or 3 quarters. To allow for minor variations, we are asking for an additional $40 and rounding the total reimbursable figure to $900 per fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:cm J� , C- -4, ,S N t' i s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECTS Acquisition of Engineering/Public Works /Maintenance Equipment and Vehicles for Fiscal Year 1988 -89 RECOMMENDATION: Submitted to Council for Informational Purposes. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The 1988 -89 Program of Service includes A significant investment in Capital Expenditures for equipment and vehicles needed to execute Engineering /Public Works /Maintenance Programs. Dae to the very lengthy process in acquiring new equipment and vehicles, Engineering and Purchasing are working closely to prepare and advertise for bids. Although no further Council action is necessary al this time, we have listed, for informational purpnaes, the equipment and vehicles we expect to seek bid proposals on in early Augusts ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIO:i 01- 4637 -7045 Replace and upgrade #210 with a 7 Passenger Mini 6 ICS Van 01- 4637 -7045 Replace and upgrade #211 with 4x4 Utility L IGS Vehicle CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 01 -4641 -7045 New utility vehicle 01-4641 -7044 Phone Patch Radio (for Pub. Wks. Eng.) 01 -4641 -7045 2 -Way radio (for new utility vehicle) 3� Staff Report Page 2 TRAPPIC MANAGEMENT CIS Replace #230 with Mini Van 01- 4639 -7045 Racks and Special Equipment for Van MAINTENANCE 01 -4647 -7044 Four 2 -way radios (for existing equipment) 01- 4647 -7044 Materials spreader (for grounds group) 01 -4647 -3900 Slit seeder (for grounds group) 01- 4647 -7044 Sod cutter (for grounds group) 01- 4647-7044 Irrigation Remotes /Moisture Sensors for Red Hill, Heritage, Lions and Beryl Parke 01- 4647 -7044 Meyers irrigation and electrical pedestal 01- 4647 -7044 2 -Way Radio Repeater 01- 4647 -7044 Two phone patch radios (for Maintenance Superintundent and Maintenance Supervisors) 01- 4647 -7044 Ice Machine 01- 4647 -7044 paint mixer (for sign and paint ci •) u1- 464' - .,,4 Mlscvllsneou: Moes, sacoles, hydraulic 1„ppe,., otc. (for Tree Crew) 01 -4647 -7044 Miscellaneous mouses, edgers, etc. (for grounds group), 01- 4647 -7044 Hand held 2 -way radio (for new Crew Supervisor) 01- 4647 -7044 Mechanics tools, shop tools, engine analyzer (for vehicle maintenance group). 01- 4647 -7045 Tractor w /grader and radio (for grounds and trails groups) 01 -4647 -7045 Three Park Utility Vehicles for Red Hill and Heritage Parks 3'7 o� a RL/AP@qbml tted, RRM: US: la 0 Staff Report c Page 3 01 -4647 -7045 Vacuum Truck ? IGS Replace 1645 - Backhoe 01 -4647 -7045 IGS Replace and upgrade #612 - 3/4 ton pick -up with a 1 ton flatbed 01 -4647 -7045 Utility van (for facilities group) 01- 4647 -7045 3/4 ton pick -up w /spray rig (for trails and Chem. app. group) 01 -4647 -7045 3/4 ton pick -up w /dump body (for crew supervisor) 01- 4647 -7045 Riding mower w /trailer (for mowing group) 01- 4647 -7045 72- 4225 -7045 Rini Van trade with RDA to serve as loaner (Equipment 4 Vehicles Program) 40% General Fund and 60t IGS 11- 4637 -7045 STREET SWEEPER (5 YEAR LEASE PURCEASP.) RL/AP@qbml tted, RRM: US: la 0 • •.• l'� `•[yv�`r uxL MEMORANDUM apple .Y�II1 4:1 LITB3 August 18, 1988 TOt Mayor and City Council 1 FROM: Mark B. Lorimar• Sr. Administrative Assistant //uuA- SUBJRCrm COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SBLRCUON OF NEW BOARD MBNBRR RSCONOBROATION It is reco ®ended that the City Council appoint John Homerino to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board of Directors as recommended by maanimous decision of the Directors. INFORMATION At its meeting of August 16, 1988, the Community Foundation Board of Directors approved the selection of John Mannerim to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Ralph Lev +s. The Board of Directors finds that John Memoriam is a resident of Ramho Cucamonga and that he mould be an outstanding asset to the Community Foundation. As the Council is aware, John has been an extremely active member of thu community for many years, most notably serving to a member of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce. Us has served ac a highly respected attorney in his community for many years. The Board of Directors rerpectfully recommends the selection of John Memerino to the Community Foundation at ynur upcoming September 7, 1988 regularly scheduled meeting. MRLm jIs cc: Lauren Wasserman 88 -580 .3 q w .F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGAk STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy A. Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Ordering the Annexation of Certain Territory to a Special Maintenance District for Parcel Map 11222, Tract No. 13722 and Tract No. 13825 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt he attached resolutions ordering the annexation of Parcel Map 11222, Tt ict 13722 and Tract 13825 to the appropriate landscape and lighting a:aint nonce districts. Background /Analysis Attached are the Coasent and Waiver to An fixation forms signed by the developers for the subject projects. This to,m enables the City to annex property w existing maintenance districts Ciro all the property owners have granted their consent to such an ann xition without conducting a public hearing or posting. This form of s •,exation is Permitted by the Streets and Highways Code. Also included is the Certificate if ;efficiency executed by the City Engineer. In addition, are the resoi,.tions to be adopted by the Council to finalize the annexatio,% Resp y ubmitted, R6:JAA:3j Attachment A t. .y (ENG)` CONSENT AND WIPER TO ANNEXATION FOR pAgm. MAp 11222 (OR aZ -s3,) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO.YGA, CALIFORNIA, has previnusly formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the "Act "), being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, special maintenance district known and designated As Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred as the "Maintenance District"); and, WHEREAS, the provisions of Article II of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the legislative body to order the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District; and, WHEREAS, the legislative body may, pursuant to said provisions of the Act, order the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report" as would otherwise be required by the provisions of the A,:t if all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be an•iexed have given written consent to the proposed annexation; and. WHEREAS, the undersigned, the owners of al; property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District, acknowledge that pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the undersigned would be entitled to notice and hearing and the preparation of an Engineer's "Report" pertaining to the annexation of the property owned by the undersigned to the Maintenance District. The undersigned, however, acknowledge that they are aware of the Proposed annexation to the Maintenance District of the property owned by the undersigned, and waive any and all right which the undersigned may now have to notice and hearing or the filing of an Engineer's "Report" pertaining to the annexation of the undersigneds' property to the Maintenance District. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby declared by the undersigneJ property owners as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the undersi wed, constituting the owners of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and further constituting all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance Dist ^ict, hereby consent to the VVposed annexation of Laid property to the Maintanance Disj�1 lthout notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer' 1' p •t" pertaining to such annexation I DATED June 21, 1988 41 Partner STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RUSSELL H. MAGUIRE, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the duly appointed CITY ENGINEER of tho lVX UqS:, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIGA, fjj�: CALIFORNIA. ,bl,� That on the 9• day of A t 1988, i reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexa on pertaining to annexation of certain Property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City 3+ Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and lqy examination -evealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by •`_ owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be anr:..ed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 3 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED thisl hday of August 1988, at ch ucamonga, California. N N CITY OF RAli D-COCgMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF • CONSENT AND WAIVER TD ANNEYATICH FDR 117 PARcEI, !UP 11222 DEi 87.33) To LANDSUI►E�T-lld: �• 3 STREET LIGHTING NAINTEMNCE DISTRICT AND STREET LIGHTING IAINTEv= DISTRICT NIi -,T STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RUSSELL H. MAGUIRE, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the duly appointed CITY ENGINEER of tho lVX UqS:, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIGA, fjj�: CALIFORNIA. ,bl,� That on the 9• day of A t 1988, i reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexa on pertaining to annexation of certain Property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City 3+ Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and lqy examination -evealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by •`_ owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be anr:..ed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 3 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED thisl hday of August 1988, at ch ucamonga, California. N N CITY OF RAli D-COCgMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 Cali 5 S 1 I - CONSENT AND Mum TO ANNEXATION FOR TRACT NO. 13722 y- (r,NGi WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL Of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMGA, CALIF yr has Previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the ter�as�of the `Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972• (the . "Act "), suing to the 15, part 2 Of the Streets and Highways Code of the State Of California, special ,maintenance district known and designated as Landsca a Maintenance District No, 2 , Street Lighting Maintenance District No, and Strout Lighting Main eenance District No. 3 (hereinafter referra3T as the •Mainte,,ance District•); and, H4EREAS, the provisions of Article It of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the legislative body to order the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District; and, WHEREAS, the legislative body may, pursuant to said provisions of the Act, order the annexation Of territory to the Maintenance District without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's " Repert" As would otherwise be required by the provisions of the Act if all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed have given written consent to the proposAd annexation; and. WHEREAS, the undersigned, the owners of all property within the te Proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District, acknowledge that pursuan rritory t to the provisions of the Act, the undersigned would bit entitled to notice and hearing and the preparation of an Engineer's 'Report, pertaining to the annexation of the property owned by the undersigned to the Maintenance District. The undersigned, however, acknowledge that thty are aware of the proposed annexation to the Maintenance District of the property awned by the undersigned, and waive any and all right which the undersigned my now have to notice and hearing or the filing of An Engineer's •Report• pertaining to the annexation of the undersigneds' property to the Maintenance District. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby declared by the undersigned property owners as follows: SECTION 1, That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2, That the undersigned described 1n Exhibit Constituting the aers Of the property A Owners hereto and incorporated herein by this raference and further constituting all cl the property within tM territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District, hereby consent to the proposed annexation of said Property to the Maintenance Distric thout ice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Re ore• p n to such annexation. DATED: C �I CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF CONSENT AND WAIVER To ANNEXATION FOR 7RAr- NO,, 13722 TO IANOSCAP 2 STPiET LIGHTING'MAINTEMANCE DISTRICT NOT" AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0r- STATT OF CALIFORNIA COUNIf OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA RUSSELL H. MAGUIRE. the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the duly appointed CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 19th day of Atxmt 1988. I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annex�Ton pertaining to the annexation of certain property to Via Maintenance District, n copy of which is on file to the Office of the City Clerk, That I caused saic Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealA that said Consent and Waive:• to Annexation has been signed by the ownerf of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 19th day of Auguat , 1988, gl2mon"" CaCITY pMGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA a. c eaa!� @Tr i 4 Y Ann xCon n UK) CONSENT AND WAIVER TO AMEYATION FOR TRACT 19825 WHEREAS, the CITY COUMCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMuA, CALIFORNIA, has previously apngoan dLightingaAct maintenance (thet'Ac` pursuant Di the Lanes of the ), 6ting Division 15, part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, speatai maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. I , Street Lighting Maintenance District Ma. I and Street Lighting Main ei: narce District No. 2 (hereinafter referred% as the 'Maintenance District"); and, WHEREAS, the provisions of Article iI of Chapter 2 of the AcE authorize the legislative body to order th- annexation of territory to the Maintenance District; and, WHEREAS, the legislative body may, pursuant to said provisions of the Act, order the annexation of territory to the Maintenance Distric. without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's •Report• as would otherwise be required by the provisions of the Act If a1T of the amen of property within the territory proposed to be annexed have given written consent to the propoced annexation; and, WHEREAS, the undersigned, the owners of all property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District, acknowledge that pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the undersigned would be entitled to notits and hearing and the preparation of an Engineer's •Report• pertaining to the annexation of the property owned by the undersigned to the Maintenance District. The undersigned, however, scknowledge thrt they are aware of the proposed annexation to the Maintenance District of the property owned by the undersigned, and waive any and all right which the undersigned Play now have to notice and hearing or the filing of an Engineer's *Report* Pertaining to the annexation of the undersigneds' property to the Maintenance Distrtct. NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby declared by the undersigned property owners as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the undersigned, constituting the amen of the property described in Exhibit •A• attached hereto and incorporated herr.tn_ by this reference and further constituting all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District, hereby ^onsent to the propostd annexation of said property to the Maintenance District without notice and tmartng or filing of an Engineers "Report" pertaining to such annexation. DATED: July 28, 1988 �4 PROPERTY ct n,.o war I Vice President S a ' _Iil/ rol Ga[laahe>. I Asst. Secretary 0 ;s _,, �, -.m.. __,y�p;;.fwd'44c _- •^�"'i.i{:I+iis'".. ,- .. ., ��;�i?�.r� -.ib� :. Ny CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF CONSENT AND WAIVER TO AMEYATION FOR rg. 1 s25 TO LANDSGP ' I II 6. 1 AN STRE E7�LI6HTIN6 +It1INTENANClOIDISTRICT Kr- . 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAM DERNPADINO CITY OF RANCHO cuCAMONGA � it RUSSELL H. KkGUIRE, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows; y ' That I an the duly appointed CITY EHG!NEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. f, CALIFORNIA. J That on the g day of A t 1988, I revizwed n Consent and Waiver to Annex& on pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Cr That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexatior to be examined and my er-mination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been i s'gned by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meet% the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. E%ECUTEO this 19th day of Auguat 1998, at C nga, California, R n M CI GA STATE OF CALIFORNIA r • o 1 y :Y'��r,'a,.eyt:. 4r•;s�av ��.v_.� .er_, - -_ „ <r ;•� -.c: —... .-;c -. r �. f�,F+ ZC` RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO NCOt�E CTCEPT NTERRITOT CALIFORNIA. SPEIIALWINTANNEEDISTRICT FOR PARCEL MAP 11222 l California, hEaas Previously formedta sppecialCmaintenancehdistrictnpursu ant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Stroets.and Highways Code of the State of-California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No, b (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance District'); and 'LandscapiWHEREAS. a ighting Actiof 1972" authorize theaannexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the Citiy'Courcil is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and to be annexeddpto all 07 District have filedhwith thee ily Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report ". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCWONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative boo hereby or :Lrs the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A' and the work program lreas as described in Exhibit "B' attached hereto to the Maintenance Di.trict. including SE�h —T M 3of That assesfuture saents, puildbegappl icable1tothenterrltory ct, - annexed hereunder. 47 aj kK .l r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM t LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. a STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6 I � 1 , •IdPnpw nDmmlmbnJinilgnmlpmn nl flnllaaY d r � l.•n 1 • R.IR' /. Jl1n0111G.nmlli -ilL OYIpIWlyli . r II 111 I I i�..I- �• � weaa �wel wa• PARCEL 6 CPP! OF RWCRO CUCAMOMA n „ � COUNTY OF dAN H>vINA1 .o =: STATN OF CAWOBNi/► EXHIBIT *38 PROJECT ME PARCEL NAP 11222 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE 28.5 ACRES, No. OF ASSESS. UNIT 57 UNITS STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. 1 8 --- --- 6 2 -- --- - - 2 8 -- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf District No. Street Name 3 JAA:9/7/88 Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. r 11 F i Iwr L`: .. � ;'li:'!,i';fr2�V iYkk�/�.'1.�y�5�,�`.,_', -r',- - _., .,�yP.. _ v.ri'� :raJ �r��•;j`a'.lu�'[y'i•�� RESOLUTION No. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF RANCHO CJCANONGA CALIFORNIA,LORDERING THE A•WEJUTIOA OF - CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT NO. 13722 WIIEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lightingy Act of 1972', being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Straet Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (hereinafter referrEd to as the 'Maintenance District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19720•authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Otstrlct;'and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report'. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described in Exhibit '8' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the Tevy of all assesseents, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 0 h EXHIBIT "A' ` ASSESSMENT DIApGgRAfMC N STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCECDISi RIOT NO.o AND 3 Crff 01 RANCHO CUCAMONGA • \� COUNTY OF SAN BWARDINO .a STA'I'R 01 CAI.II�ORNIJ► MAISIT '6' i PROJECT NAME TRACT 13722 _ NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE 120 LOTS, NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT 120 UNITS STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No, oft 3 to be Annexed District No. 3 39 ___ ___ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf District No. Street Name 2 ___ JAA:9 /7/88 r Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. ,'t 3S �,�Y. tom_ v, ; ��.y_w.w �. =•;4;.'W - . f RESOLUTION No. OF RANCHO A RESOLUTION OF THE-CITY COUNCIL HE AANNE)(ATION OFF CUCWNGA, CALIFORNIA ORDERING THE CERTAIN TERRITORY To A SPECIAL MAINTENANC E DISTRICT FOR TRACT WHEREAS. the City Council of the.Ci V of Rancho Cucamonga- ursuant to California, has Previously forecd a special anti ^te197 0 dbei�9 Division 15, of the 'LaneseaPing and Lighting Mt of 1972' the arms a Code Of the Stets of Callfornle, said part 2 of the Streets end V. Street Li hting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street L19hting n _ °�SLr {cL maintenance district known and dosig0 °tad as Landscape Mal ^tenon Maintenance District No, Z (hereinafter referrtd is as the iaintenance District'): and 2 of thO dditional WHEREAS. the Provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 authorize the annexation of a territory to the Maintenance District and iD1EREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous ttachedehereto and rnceedings to annex the property describud On Exhibit and proposed incorporated `erein by this referenced W the My w> thin the territory NHERFAS, all 0f the owners District t property proposed annexation without notice and hearing or to be annexed to the Matntt ^ante 0lstrict have filed with the City Clerk their filing Of an Engineer s -Report ". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOMS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true orders correct. annexation SECTION 2: '.net this legislative body Hereby Of the proper -Y as shown in Exhibit A and the work program areas as described ie Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Nstntena^ceDistrict. t District, SECTION 3: Th at all future Proceedings of the Ma including a levy all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 53 W ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 fFfCL a 41 G, b I I O T142 ua. re t �� IAOU n - a0 /•I • 11 y �' `1 • .p/ y cm OF J"cRO CUC/1M0IiOA s ue= COLTY �r os am zaexASnalo BTATI OF CAI.ilORMA i b EXHIIIT"38 PR�IECT NAME TRACT 13825 NO.-OF D.U. OR ACREAGE 6 LOTS, NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT 6 UNITS STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Laws to be Annexed Olstrfct NO. WOOL VWUL lb'� i!Z,UUU 1 — --- --- --- - -- 2 --- --- --- • LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf District No. Street Mme o%A:9/7/88 Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: SePia;ber.4;,I988 TO: City Counol'and.City;Manaqer j, FROM: Russell, H: Maguire, City'Engineer BY: Barryo. P R. Hanson, Senior 4--ill Engineer SUBJECT: F)iVIWPKMTAL ASSESSMiMT,,A90 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10981 5utttal of a Resolu ti on co�fl r* n' a Ii Iry, 2-ouncii 'aec'lsfori^ made on August 17 19&8 for an appeal" of Planning Commission conditions for a proposed subdivision of 18.28 acres of land Into 4 parcels located between ;7th and 0th streets east of Hellman Avenue - APN: 209-271-58 RECOMMENDATION: Staff reLomends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. Background/Analysfs On August 17. 1988, the City Council heard the applicant's appeal of four (4) conditions of approval. The attached Resolution reflects the Council's decision to deny the appeal of all four conditions. Res s edL. IL RHM ed ed A7ttachwjmen ,50 S� t I I '6, RESOLUTION NO. 88 -124 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAWOM COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.\NONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N�IMBER 10981 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap Number 10981, submitted by Golden West Equity, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 4 parcels, the real Vroperty situated in iho City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 209- 171 -58, located between 7th and 8th Streets, East of Helimaa Avenue; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1938, the Planning Commission held a My advertised public hearing for the above - described nap. ROW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED PS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the rep is consistent with the Gemiral Plan. 2, That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4 That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects an abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been revile—w-eTlEnT considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Nap No. 10981 is hereby approved subject attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: I Improvement of 8th Street shall be as follows: a. Full width improvements including the lnndscaping on the north side across the entire length of the parcels fronting 8th Street, shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer upon development of parcel 1, 2 or 3. Exhibit "A" e• i� 2. 3. 4. 1 b. Parkway improvements on the south side shall be constructed on a parcel, by parcel basis upon development of each parcel.•t , c. An improvement certificate 'shall be placed upon the final map for items a and b aoove. •- Existing Overhead Utilities a. 8th Street The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication) on the project side of 8th Street shall be underground from the first pole off -site east of the east parcel sap boundary to the first pole off -stto west of the west parcel, nap boundary upon development of Parcel 1, 2 or 3. An improvement certificate shall be placed 'or the final map noting the above. The developer may request a reisbursoment apraement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for andergrounding from future., development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the north side of the, b. On -site Electrical - Existing overhead utilities located within a Southern California Edison easement extendina through parcels 1, 2 and 3 shall be undergrounded free the first pole oft' -site east of the east Parcel Map boundary to the first pole off -site vest of the west Parcel Map boundary upon developent of parcel 1. 2' or 3. An igprovemint certificate shall be- placed on the final map noting the above c. Railroad lines- An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead Railroad Communication lines located within the railroad right- of-way to the north shall be paid to the city upon development of each Parcel. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the entire project frontage. A separate parkway landscape and irrigation plan per City Standards shall be provided subject to approval of the City Engineer for he north side of 8th Street. This landscaped parkway is required to be annexed into the landscape maintenance district. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided as follows: a. Between Parcels 1 and 2 on 8th Street, b. From the proposed drive approach on Parcel 3 on 8th Street to the property to the east, c. From the existinq drive approach on the property to the west on 7th Street to Parcel No. 4, and ama , I d. From;,the easterly drive approach',on 7th Street locgt'ed an 4 Parcel-,Wo; 4 to thj,propor.V to the east. i. PrIor*t0'iIs*5uAnce of,building permits, providete drainago.sildi to -vor f As -.cap&CitY to serve 'the prt;�osed develo yn'-� treti--h Mister Plan StOm DraWLIWU 7thn'4@ss&r 5hall &t-if eligible *_Ifn;� lle� as approved by the MY Engineer ^3nd Mall be or standard-moster plan facility cost reimbursement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS'DAY OF im. PUA41MG ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ..- .. A 1._n I 1, Brad Buller, Deouty Seceetary of the planning Commission of tjw City of Rancho Cucamonga, d6 hereby certify that the foregoing regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by t,,- p,,,RIs0lutI0,-' WAS duly and 'ntr Cue nf"q Commission of the City of Rancho got at a regular meeting of the PlaWIM9 Commission hold on the 22nd day of June, 1989. by ' the following rote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: EMERICK. SLAKESLEY, CMITIEA, MCMIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSE47: C"ISSIONERS: NONE fA Can M wa CW-,,M fCt'�WI emInm K g1y1�( In Inelastic ?am NV OL JAW / lase Ileas e4[Iq w W lleras q A11resAl. I. Ca"Ch Me WII y.AM as All ytrw %treat . as.f.p W ell assails" etlrr" r at4 4 tee trutlr y. _J,G' S. Chasteness ' strealty r4 « W r ,L +lam«) Ir the asset tat a 4141 het all �� --•�� Q Mtse fat as Meat fat r l' 1tWWtArayat/ IW rqW slll M rAalrq Pay, Catty t. All ratI1tt q seAlMlsr IApvet W spas WII be MWtq a hllrsl I. Rectal tetaA I'.rrM W 4sht [vent u 411 Ials W blet 4sV s[e ta�rrlt Aswsh1 am. bless r "*an Arty WII Nrr[A q All etl.� W 041, y rA[v4C Mwrtit eta as sir WI by C.C.Y.[ _ 1. Natty Osturelasskah" bW s1Ush fetes rlMt.f.a ea y resh4s.rt1. Ise WStr r W a" W City Me1asp•t l- fell4.tl /a 11ASaU Ia 1alelk at WII y Mk t d a W CI" Assn U—UI Yta11r UraeM pluM "Arty. h $rwe Mnateata 1• la t�l�ll [trot ap[nas14 W1gW. bet eat t411N Isrlssl say, �rWhat Ito 's ca"I, kta/[r ;I'M". t. A ease. q M -fps sl4 NrAata slash A I0.f4t seats INIaUt 11119.." ,It be matrketq fat. all half. satW ttratt. frstltl[t W ftllrttl YUtty lasnnasnit IatNlry but ast assess let II a Tra I a r V ✓ INttfl ([) If sC s.An ttAtasU, It shelf be nvnitassr w am Mlr IstW " (141 t.satkalttl W InlgtM r as1.r. (C) L.A.* ti Mre�st) q /r (/A-I W /aI W II y poop fq W Ilrs u wtN. safe 1. fw'WII M MN -0 M[f[[4.1 M al MIk rlpl- ary.). /see Ile C111 CgIr+4 office. WItkW 1U Mu,t[14r PAnitt rt41rN. A. "a", 'aaaa ls, Pars Ishii 6. Ira.rN 1t [ Ary late, Call, as As "MIN as ty Illy I'1t.ra pier 1[ rCnmd qt pelt. C• rtWl.[1sIW bbl C —dt-M. W hear, Walsall. pay la IM 4111 ilia U M"1&7 rive r elAa alMas Mlk (� 1. In I'll q[gllslo rtrrt .re tf [ btllk rrlfel slat, W CIt, lay tslts,,.. � [IU MutM[tsay ease .[p ra by l4 7. Serves IIPt llsalwt, a aal a. W a be aarane y W be s [ Withal, 1AleAe CeY.rl W ty alll r4rpes1l tenki. WII M r 4ta.un rata as 1• WIeM W Inlplk. Ilea[ Wit by orltlN M yaj wwel lt. pl—ast 01[ItW pw y the Itl.uu� to. fray.M.tM 6s1ASp /IM Wlt asl web ah.ab, 44nlbsU 6sW WII b shIbIIN b ices" fasnJSNt. 11. A r."ll Will y realrN sea's 1y fro GBar f41 M 1 sl y esh riot -ef. ce r. ;j! lit d! ■ � ��t - | & - t` a; � hit A | t| , ■ /�• #r. � | � ! N | � k a 1 6 % & § � f-�! ! � � it ' ! -■ �| | �f ; \ ■ § � ` � | � � # � t a k � ,- � � gl 16 lit i ■ f M N u i 0 RESOLUTION N0, g $ - 5a3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, NUMBER 10981, TO SUBDIVIDE 18.28 ACRES INTO 4 PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA NO. 3, LOCATED BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH STREETS EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE - APN: 209 - 171 -51; A. RECITALS (1) Bruce McDonald, an behalf of Golden West Equity ProGerties, Inc., has filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map 10981 described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereof. r, In this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Yap request is referred to as 'the Tentative Parcel Hap'. (ii) On June 22, 1908, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the Tentative Parcel Kip, and fallowing the conclusion of said hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 88 -124 thereby approving the Tentative Parcel Map. MO The applicant has filed a timely appeal of the approval represented in said Resolution No. 88 -124 on the basis of four (4) Conditions contained in said Resulution. The Conditions appealed are described as follows: a. The requirement to construct 8th Street full width (Special Condition I.e.). b. The requirement to underi,rounding the existing overhead utilities on the south side of 8th Street (Special Condition 2.a.). c. The requirement to pay an 1r. -lieu fee for the future undergrounding of railroad communication lines (Special Condition 2.c.). d. The requirement to provide a landscaping elan for the north parkway of 8th Street (Special Condition a.) (1v) On August 17, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the appeal of the Tentative Parcel Map and, on said date, concluded the public hea -ing. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. MM I CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO Tentative Parcel Nap 1OS81 September 7, 1988 !` Page 2 8, AESOLUTIOH NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of kancho Cucamonga as follows: 1, This Council hereby specifically finds Liat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct, 2, This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in coomoppliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and concurs Wth the issuance of the mitigated negative Declaration issued on June 22, 1988. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced August 17, 1988, heirinty including written staff reports, the minutes of the above - referenced June 22, 1988, Planning Commission meeting and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -124 this council specifically finds as follows: a. The Tentative Parcel Nap applies to property located between 7th and 8th Streets east of Heilman Avenue in the General Industrial Development District, Subarea No. 3; b, The Development District and the development status of the surrounding property is as follows: North - A.T.BS,F. Railroad main line East - General Industrial - vacant South - Low (2 -4 DU's AC) Residential - Developed West - General Industrial - Existing Industrial Building c. The Tentative Parcel Nap contemplates the subdivision of 18,28 acres into four (4) parcels; d. The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution No._ 88 -124 including the conditions appealed by the applicant remain to be appropriate and necessary to the subdivision of the property; and e. The Development as specified will not contradict the goals or objectives oi' the General Plan or Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and would not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. M CITY COUNCIL MrSOLUTION N0. Tentative Paro!l Nap 10981 September 7, 1988 Page 3 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Tentative Parcal Nap is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; b. the design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel }sap is consistent with the General Plan and Development Coda of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; C. The subject site is physically suitable for the type of subdivision proposed; d. The design of the proposed subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; e. The subdivision is not likely to cause serious health problems; and f. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with arty easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed development. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the Tentative Par.el Map subject to all of the Conditions set forth in Planning Comission Resolution No. 88 -124 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit 'A'). 6. The Council hereby provides notice to Bruce McDonald of Golden West Equity Properties, Inc. that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by the Resolution must be sought is overned by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Bruce McDonald at his address as per City re-ords. I MEN 1 A. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT h DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager _z P FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Release of Agreement for Postponement of CCAR's for Tract 13443, located at the southeast corner of Millken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane RECO 6MWTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Revocation, Release, Satisfaction end Caneelation of saideagnreayent and tolcauseauthorizing to rec mayor and City Clerk to sign Background /Analysis On October 1, 1987, the City Council entered into an agreement for the postponement of CCAR's for Tract 13443. Said agreement ar3s recorded on November 20, 1987, document No. 874131e6, Official Records of San Bernardino Counter, California. CCAR's have been approved by the City Attorney for Victoria Vineyard Seven the buyer of Tract 13443, and recorded on July 21, 1988, document No. 9- 238028, Official Records of San Bernardino County, California. The recording of the CCBR's meets all conditions of the Agreement recorded on November 20, 1987. WB- Attachment ubmltted, lDv t � Y`v RESOLUTION NO. 8 S Sa V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWA. CALIFORNIA; RELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEIENT OF APPROVAL OF CCBR'S FOR TRACT 13443 WHEREAS, to meet the requirements, as a prerequisite to appproval of building permits for Tract 13443, the- subdivider of said tract, The William Lyon Company, entered into an Agreement for Postponement of CCIR's. and WHEREAS, said requirements have been met by the recordation of CCBR's, document No. 884 238028 recorded in San Bernardino County, California, and the current devetopar, Victoria Vineyard Seven, submitted a Revocation, Release, Satisfaction a..id Cancelation of Agreement for approval and execution by said City. NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said agreement ba and the same approved and the Neyor is authorized to execute saw on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. / E rx /J4< CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (� 1 ENGINEERING DIVISION NO SCALE CA'V N rrm. TITLB: T.-. 134q -3 �•u• ME CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT Oate: September 7, 1908 To: City Council and City Manager From•.: Russell H. Hagaire, City Engineer Py: C. Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer Subject: Award the 'Construction "of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the, Intersection of Highland Avenue and Archibald Avenue.`4aprovement Project' to Hovey Electric, Inc., for the amount of $65,260.00 to be funded from TDA/Art. 8, Account'Ho. 12- 4637 -8825. RECORM ,rIOR: It is recomsmended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Highland Avenue and Archibald Avenue Improvement Project to the lowest, responsible bidder, Hovey Electric, Inc., for the amount of $65,260.00 811LCCROIMD /ARALISIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on August 26, 1988 for the subject project. Hovey Electric, Inc., is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $65,260.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was 583,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be completa and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Resp ful uhmitted, RHM Attachment r ■{ � ! � ■ ' ;] 3 k t � 2® � . § k© © ® §22® |§ | § $ §- b i ■ § # ■ m � e a § &f ƒ 2 . � §■: � @ ® ■ � ■ |k � k B§■\ � 2�\ � § :\ ■| e ■ k§ q S �■f §�§ � R2|■) / IS I !f ; § � 2 �! ■ § § §a | a 3 s i' f — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Award the City Corporation Yard Project Phase I, Base Bid 'A' including Alternate 4 deduction to Lucky Construction Company for the amount of $2,098,000.00, to be funded from Capital Reserve, Account No. 25 -4285 -7043 RECOHN"TIOM: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for City Corporation Yard, Phase I. Base Bid 'A' including Alternate 4 deduction to the lowest responsible bidder, Lucky Construction Company for the amount of $2,098,000.10. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on August 23, 1988 for the subject project. Lucky Construction Company is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $2,098,000.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $1,900,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complote and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. The total funds allocated for all aspects of this project in the adopted 88 -89 fiscal budget are 2.2 million. In order to construct +ha major facilities and pursuant to Item B of the proposal it is recommended that only Base Bid 'A' contract be awarded including Alt. 4 deduct. The purpose of Alts. 2, 3 and 4 was to give the City the flexibility to construct at least the msln facilities within budget. Alt. 1 cannot be deducted due to the City being squired to eliminate the City's existing tank farm (Grove Yard). Alt. 2 and 3 would eliminate all covered equipment parking Equipment requiring covered parking is now stored in the vehicle maintenance area which will not be possible when the II le CITY CITY COUNCILtSTAFF,:REPORT';. CITY CORPORATION•YARD- } g PETEMBER 7;' 1988 maintenance facilitiei'aro completed under this contract. Although,Alt. •; g, 2 and 3 were included'as - last resovt deducts, it. 1s not recommended that they be considered in_ the.' award. Certain 'equipment; such__fas 'park ' ' maintenance trucks equipped, with' hand tools, edpers,!mo►ers,^eti , -.ridfng 1> mowers, generators; etc. would deteriorate such faster, if, -left exposed to harsh weather conditions' such!as• +rain. Alt. 5 was /jAncluded'in the T Droposal to allow the City. to "compare the bidders price of, equipment'uith l the City's vendors 'price of equipment— There appears. to' be no r significant savings :and the', equipment" will need to be rchased;'in" any T" case in order to accomplish the Ci 's objective. Alt.-' was included`so that the cost of ms:ovingg the. tanks at Grove Yard could be evaluated. i Therefore, it is recommended that Alts.,5 and 6 will not be considered in M; the award. Alt. 4-appears-to be the only deduct that can be utilized.to reduce cost without ,significantly effecting the project. Not only'can Alt. 4 be accomplished at a later date at considerable savings, it is not an integral part of the landscape and entry improvements 's approved by the Design Review Comsittee. *; Respec u� d, �Y OV RNN• w At a cc: Purchasing t 1 W v r R ° 8 ° p o 0 o m a °o °. °• Cl �: CI p " n CI o p CI N P H . p p O U W M pl til h •�.• ,�., •• N wl V N fn N M M M o g n "8, 0 0 S pp qoq YNgf o o 111fff m N O N 4 m O N O N In •• Ii>i 10 r N O n O p 1.1 m Q p m u N ti I1 N H fV IPG S 1y�1 Op S 8 p N U O •t i i 1� U 10 N P p p N c N jSF$`ji N N N m �! N N N M M M N M M M M N o s s sp a s s s s o g s s g p O O O O O 6 O a S(O�S O pOp S c O O L O O 6 O OO b IIi m H w in N nN.l ti N N •.I INq N H m A •J 8� M Yl N M M q Y M M N N N M M M it 9 L Y y C N V C o 06 V O y L5 WR Y < t T G L N Q N T J 9 „fin O L Y L L q tpY fi 9 CV 9 Y m N V O hL N Y y y N N N N N Y m L' p> pu qLP qL L� p P 3a NN V < {f 9 Q > O 9 > > O Ny N ' �I N N N N » N N N N N y� yj ■p C 1 3 V M J J J J J J J J r y �� r+ N • In • � 4 E V » Y In V O V N N N N N U y II ^ _ _ _ Y M M • y r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: C. Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Tryon Street Sidewalks, west of Archibald Avenue, Improvement Project including Alternate 'A', east side of Jadeite Avenue, to 8 -1 Enterprise Corporation, for the amount of $27,101.76, to be -funded from Pedestrian Grants / Art. 3, Account No. 16- 46374717 RECOMMIDATIOtl: It 1s recommended that the City Council reject bid submitted by White Construction as nonresponsive and accept all other bids as submitted and award the contract for Tryon Street Sidewalk Improvement Project, including Alternate 'A', east side of Jadeite Avenue and not including Alternate 'B' west side of Jadeite Avenue, to the lowest responsible bidder, B -1 Enterprise Corporation, for the amount of $27,101.76. Background /Analysis Per previous Council action, bids were solic August 12, 1988, for the subject project. B the apparent lowest responsible bidder with (see attached bid summary). The Engineer including Alternates 'A' and 'B'. Staff ha: and found thm to be complete and in accordar except for the bid submitted by White Constri incomplete and nonresponsive. Staff hi background investigation and finds all biddy of the bid documents except as noted. Resp s ltted, - .CJL.sj Attachment cc: PurchLsfn9 // 0 4 and opened on r Corporation is t of $27,101.76 was $37,000.00 1 bids received rid requirements was found to be the required :he requirements- ' g S $• 8 R W R R e VAS s� 8 N e1 R= _ Rj r� o Z� egg .��a. ,.: ., �... �r: �-. �;. �p :.vi?.k'�r��"s,�'_``.i�....... yt -_ r� .'. .. '.�a -.. 1•i:• -,'�. .;^rV '�; ;,'sT."�nkt'� :tir� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - , - STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 = TO: City Council and City Manager . FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr., Civil Engineer •A • s SQJECT: Award tie Via Carrillo Drive Improvement Project from _+ Avenida Vejar to East of Sierra Madre Avenue, for the 'S amount of $175,114.71 to be funded from Grants C.D.B.G. - ? Account No. 28- 4333 -87D4 RECOM WTION: or It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for via Carrillo Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder. Laird construction Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $175,114.71. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on August 23, 1988 for the subject project. Laird Construction Company. Incorporated, is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $175 114.11 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $175,69.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. RespectfutIm submitted, J• Attachment cc: Purchasing i. \ |« ® / §§/ j §§ § �!B \ E |� , § ■ ! � 7 � ; kk§ k q 2 | � § g /kk to 2)! § k) LC )� �k ■ � q] ■ ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H: Magufre, City Engineer BY: C. Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Hellman Avenue Storm Drain Improvement Project from Monte Vista Street to the Southern Pacific Railroad and Cucaw —a Storm Drain to Steve Bubalo Construction Company;' the amount of $1,188,225.25 to be funded from Dralnage'Facllities Fund, Account No. 23- 4637 -8763 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for the Hellman Avenue Storm Drain Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Steve Bubalo Construction Company, for the amount of $1,188,225.25. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened an August 8, 1988 for the subject project. Steve Bubalo Construction Com 'Y' 1s the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $1,188.225.25 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $996,276.00. Staff has reviewed all bids recieved and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, r RHM. L: Attachment cc: Purchasing i t ;'y 8 1 � V i M b � ttN � 4 m 3 t 8 y� Y G fi s a_ p� P Np w W G Y .Cp t � O O b �I '19 s' � .� � k q \ � * ■ § % 9 Al B§2 s / §�§ � � ! { § , k � | §§k e |�2 ) � .� C 0 _ ,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7; 198V, TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maqulre,_City Engineer BY: Steve N. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector c� SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13342, located on the northeast comer 'of Hermosa^ Avenue and 19th Street, submitted by First Nationwide Network-Mortgage RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that, the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13342 were approved by the City Council on July 2, 1987, in the following &.-mounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $476,000 Labor and Material Bond: $238,000 The developer, First Nationwide Network Mortgage, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Reapp ,u sub hied, .sjm Attachments d �'•�•ff;,a';✓yt.Vr_ j�s ,,J�,,Jyyyyyy?r � ,,RESOLUiION N0. gS -P- r 1 9� A RESOLUTION, OFJHE!CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.RAkHO CUCANOMA, CALIFORNIA,' APPROYIN6•IMPROYEMENr,AGREEMENT EXTENSION;AND IMPROVEIENT•SECURITY FOR TRACT-13342, fy. NHEREAS, the City Council' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cdr. California, has for its consideration•an Dip"vement.Agreement Extension executed on September 7; 1968; by _F,irst,Nationwide Network',ibrtgage ar- w+ ' developer, for the improvement of public%right- of -wy adjacent to the real ;tr property specifically described - therein, and generally located on the }r northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue;and 19th Street; and ;k• WHEREAS, the installation of such; improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to�the'terms thereof, is to be done in { conjunction with the developrpnt of said Tract 13342; -and - WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and a accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified x? in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the,City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Ipioveent Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mgvor is hereby authorized to sign said Improveent Agreement Extension on behalf of s the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. MAN wou .e / - a 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Hos. 1 and 4 for Tract 13271, located at the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Company RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13271, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance D.strict No. 4, and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tract 13271, located at /the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue, in the Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 26, 1987, for the division of 8.7 acres into 1 lot. The Developer, Lewis Development Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Milliken Avenue Milliken Avenue Tr 13271 Mt. View- -Base Line Foothill --Mt. View Faithful Performance: $78,500 $153,600 $653,000 Labor and Material: $39,250 f 76,800 $326,500 Monumentation: $ 2,450 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.6R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form, signed by the Developer, is on file in the City Clerk's office. Resp T]y)subpitted, RHM L Attd,iments RESOLUTION NO. S% - S a Y A RESOLUTION OF, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY,OF'ItANC10 CUCAMONGA,- CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, DPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND-FINAL MAP OF TRACT,NO. 13271 WHEREAS, the-,Tentitive Map of Tract No. 13271, consisting of 1 lot, submitted by Lewis Rcroloopp�meent-Company. Subdivider, located at the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway,dnd Milliken Avenue; has been, submitted to the City of Rancho Cucaaangs,by said•Subdivider for approval �by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of She State of California, and in complianse with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirement- established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Nap of said Tract said Subdivider his offered the Improvement Abreement submitted herewith -for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvewnt Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor 1s authorized to execute saw on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and i 2. That said Improvement Security 1s accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. I / RESOLUTION N0. fv . A RESOLUTION OF.THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13271 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting'Act of 19721, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Ce" Of 'the State of California; -said special maintenance district knoan'and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No: 4, Street Lighting Maintenance Ofstrict No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4- (hereinafter referred to as the 'Naintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the uiscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced :o the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written ccasent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECT104 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECT104 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including iFa ee'vy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. r) t 9 EXHIBIT •A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 s'�v y^ C1TT OF RMCRO CUCrAMONOA A d C COUNTY 6'B am MMN�. W o =: W56 WATB Oi CAI�QItMA T EXHIBIT 'B• PROJECT NAME TRACT 13271 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE 128 LOTS, NO. OF ASSESS, UN.T 64 STREET LIGHTING NAINTENAN6E 0I -79ICP `a No. of Law to he Annexed District No. 1 --- 3 4 4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MSTRICT District No. rtreet Nam Turf Sq. ft. Ground Cover --Sq. it. Trees Ea. 4 Base Line Road 1200 2660 10 Terra Vista Pky. 32 Milliken Avenue 14 1200 2660 S6 JAA:9/7 /80 i 4 6 r: v f• a S — CIYI OF RANCHv :.UCAMONGA n r?e STAF F REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Man.rger FROM: Ibissell H. Maguire, Clty Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvevent Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Ofstri,:t No. 1 and Street Lighting Nafntenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 12969, located at Arrow Route and Edwin Street, rubmftted by Hagop and Ye;ita Kovork Yazedjian RECON EImRTION It is recommended that U.e City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 12969, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Distract Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agrevserf. and to cause raid map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 12969, located at Arrow Route and Edwin Street, in the Low Medium Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 1985, for the division of 4.78 acres into 26 lots. The Developers, Hagop and Yegia Kavork Yzedjian, are submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $113,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 56,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonqa County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the Cifv Clerk's office. Respec u�Ty) u ltted, f % R1(N: Cd •JAA: s Atta"cli—men is �' Fr .'� y.]i-. yY✓a!M1:'3'N 1�� -.. - .a '� �'._Y.�'(a�t otiY�yna:� RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREE►ENT, IMPROYEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL W1P OF TRACT NO. 12969 WHEREAS, the Tentative, Nap of Tract No. 12969, consisting of 26 lots, submitted by Hagop and -YegwYazedifan,Subdivider. located on'the south side of Arrow Routa;,east of,Grorc'Avenue, his been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by safd.Subdirlder -for approval by said City as providedlln't:he Subdivision Nap Act of"the -State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS. to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agroement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, HEREBY RESOLYES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to a�test thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and i 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 'J CA v� r RESOLUTION NO. 7 a- 5 a 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COWMCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITOPY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 12969 iMEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has proviously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terns of the 'Undscaping and Lighting Act of 19720, being Division 15, x- Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code-of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Malntenince District No, 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinaftsr referred to as the `Maintenance ;} District•); and i' WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972• autho:ixe the annexation of additional T territory to the Maintenance District; and r_ WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report'. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described In Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, Including ihlevy of all assessments, all be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 1 C) ■ 1 EXHIBIT "A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 r O 1 r t i 1 C O 0 AOnOW noon i I { ;r r Ir iZ t.Pi__� Y^ C1TT OF ItIMCSO CUCAMONOA �" •`�; �_ COUNTY OF SAN BnNA>R W0 b� 3 BTATIe OT CALU"J><NI/► �. N 1� -y•: L?"'iY^iri._K"- ut",f'. t ».. _ ExHiCET 'R' t_ P:MECT NAME TRACT 12969 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE 26 LOTS, k7. OF ASSESS, UNIT 26 UNITS STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT lto.- of Lamps to be Meexdd Dl:trfct No. WC 2 4-, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. St,-oet Nor_ ®' 4M.:9 /7/88 Turf &round Cover So. ft. S0. ft. .v st Trees Ea. a CITE Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguiro, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Ma?, Improvan.nt Agreec+ent and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Nsfntenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 13541, located north of Red Hill Country Clue Drive, east of Valle Vista, on Sierra vista Drive, submitted by Alloork. Incorporated RECO MMIATION It is recoassended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13541, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to landscape Maintenance District go. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Kos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the M.yyor and the City Clerk to sign sa!J agr!ewnt and to cause said map to record. AHALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract !3511, located north of Red H:i1 Country Club Drive, east of Valle Vista, on Sierra Vista Drive, in the Low Residential Dovelopment District, was appr^ved by the planning Comfss:2n on July 8, 1937, for the division. of 4.3 acres Into 12 lots. The Devetioper, Alinark, Incorporated, is suWitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amuunts: Faithful performance Bond. S8I,OD0 Labor and Kat--rfal Bond: $40,500 Copier. of the agreement sod security are available in tira City Cleit's Office. Letters of approval have hoen received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.U.'s have also bre:: approved by the City Attorney. Tha Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Gev_lover is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respec fly -1d't 1:36tted, Att.!cnments �� 1 E° RESOLUTION N0. 0 8 • 630 A RESOLUTION OF TNE.CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF-RANCHO F CUCAMM., CALIFORNIA,`APPROVING IWROYEMENT AGREEMENT, - IMPROVf3ENT.,SECURITY, AND FINAL MVIP OF TRACT NO. 13541 - e WHEREAS, the Tentative May of Tract No. 13541, consisting of 12 lots, submitted by Allmerk Inceayorated, Subdivider, located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive; east'of °Yalle Vista, on Sierra Vista Drfra, has'been suomitted to the City of•Rancho'Cucamonga by said - Subdivider for'approvtl by said City as provided in-the Subdivision•Nap Act- of.the'State of California, and in compliance with the'requireautnts of Ordinance No. 28-of said City; and WHEREAS, to met the requirements established as preriquisite to., approval of the.Final.M&pD ofsaid,Trrt said Subdivider has offered the y Improvement Agreemtnt,'subwitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good -and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for purposes the streets delineated thereon. HON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE OF MHO CJCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Imprrovement Agreement be and the same 1s approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is : uthorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to tone and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offer: for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. q4 in Z _rya P Y _ RESOLUTION NO. 'SCI t A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERIK THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13541 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No, 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and VAEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of on Engineer's 'Report'. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the prope as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Ksintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including LFW-T vy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. q15 F EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMEyT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 { a �CUU axMNa .: •�. ��+;`� ,.,yap 01N< __ 4y\ I wM� o� CTP! OF RAA7CH0 CUCAYONGA ~" COU= O' am BIIItA1wmo 'x S : STATZ OF CALVOWU � N V y-Zj ,;tia 1v�.3% ti DDII /IT 25' i+ PROJECT NAME TRACT 13541 NO. OF D.U. OR ACRZAGE 12 LOTS, 40. OF ASSESS. UNIT 12 UNITS ` STREET LIGHTING MINTEMME 013-YRICT No. of Loos to Oe Aonextd District No. a&WL — S5 F= zz,u 1— ADD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Stmet Raw Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. _ 1 Sierra Vista Drive - -- - -- 21 JAA:9/7/87 1> CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _. STAFF REPORT BATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager �CJ� FROM: Ruitell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Stave M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspcctoe.- -'di_' SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion 7�� RECONOWTION: The required street improvements for Parcel Nap 9646 have been completed in an acceptable manner and -it is recommended that City Council accept said improvem•.nts, -authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $13,000. Background /Analysis Parcel Map 9646 - located at the northeast corner of Moonstone Avenue and Hillside Road DEVELOPER: Or. Irwin Golden 77 East 7th Street Upland, California 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $13,000 *.2 mitted, r Attachment 1 3 i M 1 M 1, x-w-- RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY MRANCHO CUCMONGA,- CALIFORNIA., ACCEPTIWTHE PUBLIC INPROYEMENTS M: FOR PAR KV-19646-AND,WMIZIMQTHE FILING OF NOTICE-WCONPLETION FOR,,THE.WORK "-rik t WHEREAS, the construction `f public: improvements for-Paicel;Map 9646 have been completed to the satisfaction'of't he,Ctty. EngineM.'and WHEREAS, a Notice of Complietio6ls required-to be,f1led,:cek1fying the work complete. t NOW, THEREFORE.,,the.City, Council of the City of Rancho Ctf6&m6;q&AF- hereby resolves that,the work ls'zhereby.accepted.and the CityEnginear-W, authorized to sign and'fiie a Notice' of Completion with W County Recorder of- San Bernardino County., M f. t' I , I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve H. Gilliland, Public Works InspectorzfiRc SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The required street improvements for Tract 12914 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Mintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $32,600, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $326,000. Background /Analysis Tract 12914 - located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue DEVELOPER: First Nationwide Network Mortgage 23277 Ventura Boulevard Woodland Hills, California 91364 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $32,600 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $326,000 Resp fu submitted, RHN.SMfr:., m Attachment 1.00 r ., i AIV RESOLUTION No. 9 - 633 A RESOLUTION OF,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'RANCHO Ct"40KA.— CALIFORNIA; ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVDIENTS FOR TRAM. 12914 :AND: ZTNIORIZIMG. THE FILING.OF-A NOTICE OF, COMPLETION FO;t:'n(E WORK WHEREAS, the construction ' of f public improvements for Tract 12914 have been completed to the satisfxtion .of the City-Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notici'of Completion is re_qufrad to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE,' be it resolved, that,the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer ls,autharized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.-' 101 ;'ass (: �t+ Ti` _ '�'' %:='i -•`.q; tj-e v'. ,. +_ ••;.. - t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement supervisor SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT REC041ENDATION: Mark for the fallowing tracts has been completed and e cos epos s in the total amount of $5,000 is hereby recommended by the Planning Division to be released to Keufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc.: TRACT NO. 12937 -1 12935 Res ally /B Xanee C1 BB•RA:ns AMOUNT OF DEPOSIT PURPOSE $2,500 Model Nome Sales Trailer $2,500 Model Home Sales Trailer tted: F—� ba. z lm tee■ CITY OF RANCHO CUC_1MONGA STAFF REPORT , DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Grove Avenue at 8th Street and Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project awarded to Vance Corporation for the amount of $183,626.00 plus 10: contingency ($202,000.00) to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8751; F.A.U. Section 3, Account No. 17- 4637 -8776; and TDA Article 8, Account No. 12- 4637 -8783 RECMN31 ATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Grove Avenue at 8th Street and Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $202.000.00 ($183,262.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from System Development Fund Account No. 22- 463.8751; F.A.U. Section 3, Account No. I7- 4637 -8776; and TDA Articlo S. Account No. 12- 4637 -8iu3. Background /Analysis On August 17, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Vance Corporation. Staff has received from Vance Corporation, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respectf y ubmltted, Attachment l o� i. Y �[w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 7, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Ioproveaent and Dedication between Arnold C. Fehling, Jr. and Cleo J. Fabling and the City of Rancho Cucamonga -tor Street Frontage Improvements at 7539 Carnelian Street, located on the east side of Carnelian Street between vivero Street and Base Line Road, for the Carnelian Beautification Project. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Arnold C. Fehling, Jr, and Cleo J. Fehling and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGRIMDD/A UYSIS The attached subject Agreement between the City and Arnold C. Fehling, Jr. and Cleo J. Fehling provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approach, 6 foot block wall, landscaping, and street pavements along the Fehling's street frontage. Arnold and Cleo Fehling have agr_ed to grant the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the improvement and beautification of Carnelian Street in return for the construction of said improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Carnelian Street Beautification Project included in the Capital Improvement Progras List for fiscal year 1988 -89. Resp fu iW tted, Attachment i,•q , Yttjt _ Q�j RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE,BITY CWkIL OF THE CITY OF w RANCHO CUCAMOMGA;:CALIFORNIA- ACCEPTING'AN'AGREEMEWT 4" FOR'INSTALLATION•OF,PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FOR;ARNOLD C. FEMING. JR. AND CLEO J. FENLING, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of frontage ;aprovements in conjunction with the Carnelian Street Beautification Project; vnd WHEREAS, Installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, blockwall and street pavements located at 7539 Carnelian Street shall be mado part of the Carnelian Street Beautification Project; and WHEREAS, Arnold C. Fehling. Jr. and Cleo J. Fehling have agreed ?' to dedicate Right -of -Way as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. d NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City °i of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, +uthorizes the Mayer and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. mom+ I oS ■ a t• J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA y?2 . 1 STAFF REPORT 1041 AA. ' DATE: September 7, 1968 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for OR 86-46, located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Michael Patz and Gary H. Braaksma RECd0Ef0ATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement, ordering the annexation to Landscapo Maintenance District No. 3, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND DR 86 -46, located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard, in the Office Professional Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 25, 1987. The Developers, Michael Patz and Gary H. Braaksma, are submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future Foothill Boulevard median island. Copies of the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. 'he Consent and Waiver to Annexation farm signed by the Deveiopers is on file in the City Clerk's office. I pec f y u lttad, :J Attachments 100 k r r a�ts y' i C RESOLUTION NO. u + A RESDLUTION OK HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'RAMCHO CUCAMONGA. ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVENEHT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MICHAEL PATZ AND GARY H. BRAAWSMA AND ALMIORIZIHG THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEi'A'TO SIGN THE SW WHEREAS, the,CIty Council of the City of Rancho Cucemnga, adopted Ordinance No. 68 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and , WHEREAS, installation of one -half the median island on Foothill BoulevarJ established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for DR 86-46 has been ht by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Michael Patz and Gary 11. Braaksaw. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT CESOLVED that tie City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lion Agr ent, authorizes the Mayor and t9e City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. (01 l: L M RESOLUTION N0, � 8 - S3 4o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY 1Th A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR DR 66 -46 WHEREAS, the City Cauncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terns of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19720, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, (hereinaft --r referred to as the ' Maintenance District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the •Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19724 authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time tho City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District Reve filed with the City Clark their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report'. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS cnLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correcc. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including We levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. - 6 EXHIBIT •A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 CM 01 RANCHO CUCA1[ONGA COUWY OF "M MNAn.0 :3 8TA'TZ 01 CAL=nU MAIM W PROJECT NAME DR 86-46 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE .63 ACRES, ND. OF ASSESS. UNIT 1.3 STREET LIGhTING KAINTENAVCE DISTRICT 'r No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. 59MX —MOIL ibtwu — 12.OW — ZT'SUD 1 (Not required to Join) { LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT >. Turf Ground Cover Trees Y District No. Street Naas Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. 3 Foothill Boulevard - -- -_- g r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •r STAFF REPORT , DATE: September 7, 19M T0: City Councll and City Manager FR014: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: M_cepUrrca of a Real Property Improvessent Contract and Lien Agreement from Donald L. Mahoney for a Single Family Residence, located on the crest side of Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Road REMM EiDATIOIt: It is recortended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject ReAI Properwy Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and musing same to be recorded. Background /Analysis The developer of 5520 Crooked Creek Drive, Donald L. Mahoney, requested a building permit for a single family residence. Installation of street improvements is a condition of issuing a building permit. The City does not require said improvements to be built at this time. Therefore, the developer has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construction of the Improvements adjaccnt to his property. A copy of the agreement is available in the City Clerk's office. Respectful ubmitted, RHM:LB:sjm Attachment v. RESOLUTION NO. -5o3 7 'U A RESOLUTION'&�',T-HE`CITY COUNCIV OF'-THE CITY OF RANCHO CLVMWA.,CALIFOANIA;'.ACCEPTING A'REAL PROPERTY IMPRDY01EWT•COXTRACTzAND LIEN AGREEKWT FROM DONALD L.'WJMV AND AVTHDRIZING'THE- MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SI(A THE SAME-, P WHEREAS, 04CiVY Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on Febrwxy 21i'1979, to establish 'reduirements for construction of public fai ro�emtnts in conjunction with building Perot t issuance; and WHEREAS, Installation of curb, gutter, sfdewalk'and pavement established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for 5320•Crooked Creek Drive has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Donald L. Mahoney. NOW, THEREFORE, thei City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves to accept Safe Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the War and the City Clerk to sign sane, and directs the City Clerk to record sama in the Office Of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. u V G �o I 79 CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDMMMG DIMON r.= am- N 113 Tn7&-=aoj Creak Drive RECONiJMTIV %. It is recommended that Cf Council approve the ;pecffications for the City -wide Concrete Pepair Annual Maintenance Contract', and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids'. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The subject contract specifications have been completed and reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for 1988 -89 annual repair is $75,000.00. Legal advertising 1s scheduled for September 9, 1988, and September 16, 1988 wish the bid opening at 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 13th day of Cctober 194, at the City Clerks office. Respec frgl4y'. submitted, Attachment 114 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1968 TO: City Council and City Mmager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevfns, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the •Notice Inviting Bids' for the 'City -wide Concrete Repair Annual Maintenance Contract to be funded from Engineering/Maintenance Contract A Services, Account NO. 01 -M -6028 RECONiJMTIV %. It is recommended that Cf Council approve the ;pecffications for the City -wide Concrete Pepair Annual Maintenance Contract', and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids'. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The subject contract specifications have been completed and reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for 1988 -89 annual repair is $75,000.00. Legal advertising 1s scheduled for September 9, 1988, and September 16, 1988 wish the bid opening at 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 13th day of Cctober 194, at the City Clerks office. Respec frgl4y'. submitted, Attachment 114 RESOLUTION NO. D ' s3 o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNpMGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE •CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR ANNUAL MAINTENANCE CUNTRACT% IN SAID CLEW TOCADVERTISE TO RECEIVEABIDSIRECTING Tf� CITY ' certain Pi improvements 1e then City cf Rancho Cucamang#' ho Cucamonga to repair ucaaanga t WHEREAS, the City at Rancho Cucamonga ias prepared spetificatidns•or the i repair of certain 1Wreveoents. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY a the for 'CiIttywide Concrete Repair and '. Annual Maintenance Contract". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: •NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or befo: ^a the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.X. on the 13th day of October 1988, sealed bids or proposals said for the 'Citywide Concrete Repair Annual Maintenance Contract' in City, Bids will be opened and publicly read Immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Lire Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. aids oust be made on a form provided for the Purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, 08id for Repair Annual Maintenance Contract". A Pre-Bid Conference is scheduled for 9 A.M. October 10, 1988, at the City Corporation Yard Center, 9153 9th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: proposal and specifications. IN 115 100% PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor 1s required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rats of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of industrial Relations of the State of California werequT�nles ofdsa h prevailing g general dleeYaxAges are on dies office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Lix Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested Party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job sitepe. Cucamonga,otwenty fiveadollarsa($25a00)afor each laborerr,, workmn,roor mechanic employed for each calendar day or portitm thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by arty subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Cade as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, end in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the wort. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program In that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen 1n such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certfficate, or B When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C When the trade can show that it Is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or M0 When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship proyrams if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeshipp standards, wage schedules, and otter requirements may be obtained frog the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all subbcontraccttooryunder h� execution of with and tbecgoverned by thealaws ofdthe State of California having to do with working hours as set forth to Division 2. part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic imouitohu fnao any of the work harebetore mentined, for echcalendarday during wn'ch said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (81 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed In accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded' to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest City of o e lowest security RanchoCucamongato thedifferencebetween shall be applied thelowbida d bid and second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The contract amount of the workbshalipbeeonevhundred percentf(100%)lofethe� contract the 0 7 w. price thereof, and'an'additlonal bond in an amount equal to fifty percent,_ (SOZ) of the contract�price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or suPPllas, furnished for,the performance of the WO rk contracted to be -do" by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnisti a' certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A' License (General Engineering Contractor) or a Class "C-8" License (Concrete Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Codes of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $10.00, said $10.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $10.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the city of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance ratention). `I O 5 _5 _ M, and all The bids City of Rancho -Cu(itwji. California. reserves the right to reject BY order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California'. Dated this 7th day of September. 1988. PASSED AND Amino by the-COuncil Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 7th day of September, 1988. Mayor ATTEST: CIV Cle—K- ADVERTISE ON September 9, 1988 September 16. 1988 1kq N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: - September 7, 1988 `'W-yff- TO' City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids' for the 'Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Pictoria) and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista); Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract', to be funded from Landscape taintenance District No. 2 - Account No. 41 -4130 -6028 and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 - Account No. 43 -4130 -6028 RECO 100TION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria) and Landscape Maintenance District No. `4 (Terra Vista); Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract' and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the Notice Inviting Bids'. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject maintenance plans and specifications have been completed and reviowed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria) is $125,000.00; and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista) is $37,936.00. Legal adver:tsing is scheduled for September 13, 1988 and September 20, 1988 with Us bid opening at 2:30 P.M., September 29, 1988. Respectful submitted, :DB: Attachment cc: Purchasing s (ao W RESOLUTION NO. S O 557 CI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUIL OF CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PLANSEANDrr OF RANCHO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4; CITTYY AANDEAUTHORIIZZINGTAND DIRECTIN CTHE CITY CLERK OtD ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga to construct specifications the City construction oncertain prepared mprovements. and HON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY Cucamonga betandaareahereby approvedaasonthepplans andbspecificationsRforh 'Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4; Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County. California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY City NC Clerk in thioffices ofRthehCityrof RancholCu the Office of before the hour of 2:30 o'clock P.M. on the 29 day of September, 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4; Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the - City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. to the City ofsRanchobCucamonga aCalifornia,dmarked,t "Bid fors Construction of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4; Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract ". A Pre-Bid Conference is scheduled for 8:00 A.M. September 26, 1988, at City Corporate Yard, 9153 9th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents. plans, proposals and specifications. l a' PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the „general prevailing rate of per dies wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per dies wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per dies wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by his or by any subcontractor under his, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint a pmnticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be le s than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 perc:nt in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. kaen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. I'? � The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and If other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Incustrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisa, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workman employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said labo -er workman, or mechanic is required or permitte4 to labor more than eight (81 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to exec ute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into tha proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100f) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50t) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any cork or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a j a3 —ysF% rte -ay4. y ..�,ll "-ice i _ .i - -i.�•'s: . - -_ iyw:s�� 'r ". ^.t.s'^"�".'�7� rK certificate that he carries • compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done 'uider 'contract which ma)' be entioed into betweer. his and the.' -. <n said City of Rancho'Cucamonga'for the construction of said work. Re proposal will he- considered from a Contractor' whom a proposal fors has ' not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A' License (Ge —neral Engineering - Contractor) in accordance with the provisions Of the,Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. "seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the tine time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profilas, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga an file in the Office of the City Clerk rt 9321 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif'o'rnia. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $20.00, said $20.00 is nonrefundable. Uppoon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be sailed when said request 1s accoammppa+nied by payment sti►vlated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable.paynent of $15.00 to cover the cast of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of conies withheld (performance retention). ATTEST: C I ty CTe—rk ADVERTISE ON SEPTEMBER 13 SEPTEMBER 20 IAs Mayor - — Fvx Cft The f16chO:Cuc&V10ngA. California, resorves the right to reject a :ofi"r and all bids.. By order of the Cour—il of the City of Rancho Cucamn'9"&, California. Dated this 7 Jay of,Septisber, 1988. FUSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califo its, this 7 day of September, 1988. ATTEST: C I ty CTe—rk ADVERTISE ON SEPTEMBER 13 SEPTEMBER 20 IAs Mayor - — i •. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: HatveniMedian slandstand SanhBenatrdino County Flood Control (various locations) Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract* to be funded from Engineering/Maintenance Contract Se-vice Account No. 01 -4647 -6028 (Flood Coitrol) and Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 01 -4647 -6028, 46 -4130 -6028 and 43- 4130 -6028 (Haven Medians) RECONNOWTION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the 'Haven Median Islands and San Bernardino County Flood Control (various locations) Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids°. BACKGROUND /AhALYSIS The subject maintenance plans and specifications have been coapleted and for n BenrardfnonCoapproved n Flood Control Engineer. The EfornHaven Median, $7,064.00 (General Fund); Landscape Maintenance Distrt.:t No. 30, $12,276.00; and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, $7,064. Pursuant to agreement between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, maintenance cost incurred by the City for the landscaped areas at various locations where flood control channels (Cucamonga Creek, Deer Creek, Demin Channel) cross under City streets are to be reimbursed by the County. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 13, 1988 and September 20, 1988 with the Ad opening at 2:00 P.M. on September 29, 1988, Respectfully /�mitted, �41 , f�. RHM:DB:dlw Attachment cc: Purchasing 0P—Co RESOLUTION NO. 0 D - 5 ` v A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE °HAVEN MEDIAN ISLANDS AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for 'Haven Median Islands and San Bernardino County F1ooO Control Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the afores +_id plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the follewfng words and figures, to wit: ' NDTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clers in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 29 day of September, 1988, sealed bids or Proposals for the ' Havan Median Islands and San Bernardino County Flood Control Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Rase Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, 'Bid for Construction of Haven Median Islands and San Bernardino County Flood Control Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract. A Pre -Bid Conference is scheduled for 8:00 A.M. September 26, 1988, at City Corporate Yard, 9153 9th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: plans, proposal and specifications. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing i a� rate of per diem wages for work which the public work is perfon rate of per diem wages for ho11 Director of the Department of I is required to and has determin wages. Copies of such prevailfi office of the City Clerk of the Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, Cali Party on request. The Contract determinations to be posted at a similar character in the locality to and not less than the general prevailing and overtime work. In that regard, the strial Relations of the State of California s_ch general prevailing rates of per diem rates of per diem wages are on file in the V of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, nia, and are available to any interested Agency also shall cause a copy of such The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars (=25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day cr portion thereof, If such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herelnbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1979, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or ary subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing trad:.^.en in ary apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship t,amtttee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if to employs registered M, aDyrenticea or Journeymen in any apprentfceable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are raking such contributions. The Contractor ind subcontractor ur-i!er him shall comply with the requirements of sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in t %a employment of apprentices. lnformatior relative to apprenticeship standc -ds, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Dinsctor of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Adaini;trator of Apprenticeship ;an Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards acd its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the .ortractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California haeing to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is regained or permitted to labor more than eight (8( hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter, into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of gancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials cr supplles furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. �-I No proposal•will`be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal _,form has -_Pi11 ' not been tssued'by the City,of•Rancho,Cucamon9a. Contractor shall•possess�a Class 'A" License,(General engineering Contractor) in; accordance brith the - provisions of the Contractors License Law (California Business and,Professions Code. Section 7000'et: seq.)vnd.rules and egulations adopted pursuant thereto at'the tin tiw this contractlis away w. The work is to be 'done-in ac specifications of the.City of Re City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Rea the plans and specificattons,.av will be furnished upon applicati of $20.00, said'f20.GO 1s nonref Uppon written request 'by,the i will be mailed when said regwst together with an additional nonn cost of mailing charges and overl with't* profiles, plans, and waonga on flle,fn the Office of the ) Cucamonga, Cali6rnfa: Coples,of It,the- office of „the`City Engineer, r City of Rancho;Cucamonga and payment :opies of the plans and specifications rpanted by payment stlpulatad above, rle payment of $15.00 to cover the The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract a„ satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). t'�)o .b 12 ry The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reJect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; California- Bated this 7 day of septe*er, California, AND ADOPTED of the Council Of the City of Rancho Cuca�on9a, . ATTEST: er ADYERTISE ON n e 1' x t -�I Kayor 1 S s' i 7 1 F� b� i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA q' STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1998 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids' for the 'General Fund Parkways (various locations). Landscape Maintenance District Mo. 1 (various locations City wide), Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Hysop), and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (26th and Hermosa); Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract' to be funded from Engineering/Maintenarce Contract Service Account No. 01 -4647- 6028 (General Fund Parkways). Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Account No. 404130 -6028, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Account No. 42 -4130 -6028 and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Account No 44 -4130 -6028 It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the 'General Fund Parkways (various locations), Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (various locations City wide), Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Hysop), and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (26th and Hermosa); Landscape a..d Irrigation Maintenance Contract' and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids'. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The subject maintenance plans and reviewed by staff and approved by th for the General Fund Parkways is District No. 1, $46,456.00; for (Hyssop). S9DO.D0 and for Landscape Legal advertising is scheduled for Se with the bid opening at the Office 'ity of Rancho Cucamonga on or befor x)tember, 1988. Respectf .jy/iuBmi tted, .�f RHN:OB:s`jm Attachment cc: Purchasing specifications have been completed and e City Engineer. The Engineers estimate 2108,936.00; for Landscape Maintenance Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A Maintenance District No. S. $2 424.00. ptember 13, 1988, and September 26, 1988, of the City Clerk in the offices of the e the hour of 3:00 P.M. on the 29 day of 1 32 RESOLUTION NO. U 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'GENERAL FUND PARKWAYS, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 90.1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND LANDSCA E MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5; LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and : pecifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "General Fund Parkways, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Landscape Maintenance District No 5; Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County California, directing this notice, NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, an or before the hour of 3:00 o'clock P.H. on the 29 day of September 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the 'General Fund Parkways, Landscape Maintenance District Ng. 1, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Landscape Maintenance District No 5; Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read i:msediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids =st be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, 'Bid for Construction of General Fund Parkways, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Landscape Maintenance District No 5; Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract'. ►33 G $e , A Pre -Bid Ci Corporate Y, bidders saY and $Pecifi 9ths5treetedRancho Cucaewnga PC lifornia 91730a14here questions regarding the old Bocusents: plans. Proposal provisions of Calhforn' and 2, the Contractor rate of per dies wages which the public wo'k rate of per dies 143905 isrrequired to and has wages. Copies of sucl SiC f the iuteRchoCutar re uest Th' ce is hereby given that in accordance with the abor Code, Division pgeneral � l to pay lessthe,, the Prevailing r work O f a similar character to the locality in perforwed, and not less. than the general prevailing r holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the t of Industrial Rmlations of the State of California termined such general prevailing rates of par dies evailing rates of per them wages are on file in the of the City Of Rancho are available to3 any interested oad, Aeency also shall cause a copy of such party on q determinations to be posted at the boo sr .c. of Rancho The Contractor shall forfeit as p enalty to the City Cucamonga. t eyed for eachlcalenda Cloy) orrper loft thereaf plf such r I employe, for oxchanic is paid less than war the general under the attached rate of wages ornbyfanY subcant actoOr under h1o,dlnevtolationeoftthehed provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of section 1777.5 oft yeindenthe reg�nded byofChapteal;farn7a DDtorentleeship Council. prorrle with the apprentices say be employed in the prosecution of the worpkke. of t Attention is concerning the e:ployiasiiot ofnapprentices7by the nd 1777.6 Contractor or any subcontractor under hta. renrequire occu ation to apP1Y to the joint Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesaw n in any are pp apprenticenisteromit eenenticeshlD D gram in thatl trade rfor pa jest and which certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices he journeymen that enticcs to journieymen inesuchhwses shall not contract. The ratio of app be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment loyment in the e area of C0fel5 percent in the 90 draysippriorD to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When e tade can show at it i membershiprthrough apprenticeshipst ainingnonaan annual, its basis statewide or locally, or i3+ D. When the Contractor Provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,journeymen The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship pro rams if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen 1n arty apprenticoable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment, of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, rage schedules, and other requireonts mazy be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contactor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the SUM of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (81 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agreas to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed In accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (108) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same 1s awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1005) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done tMrean, and the,Contr'ictor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries cospensattan,lnsurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which mayjbe entered into between hi■ MOM said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. We proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal torn has not been issued by the City.of Rancho Cucamonga. : A— Contractor shall possessva Class "A! License (General Engineering (California ornla Business,and Profeistlonsrov�e, Section e7C000tet �segs)Landnrulesw and regulations adopted pdrsuant, thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be dont in accordance with the profiles, ro ,pplans.i of ^the specifications of the C1ty.of Rancho_ Cucamonga: •- Ctty Clerk at 9326 Base Line,Road ,Rancho_Cucasonga;,California. , �Vi irf the plans and specifications; ova ;latrie•aY tire,offlu of the City, 9 will be furnished'uporr applicatin to the City of RanehW Cuumongatand`plYment„ of $200.00, said s20.00•is nonrefundable. will6ba mailed when b said request isdaccompanied by paymentsstipulatedfabove, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of Sis.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead" 1, , satisfactory to the Cittyyrof Rancho Cucamonga° enter into a contract In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor say, upon the aunthoried securities in lieu hof monies withheld (perfoarmanceretentionjtitute l3(0 The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject arLv' - and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucaacn9a, California. Dated this 7 day of September, 1988., MSSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 7 day of September, 1988. t Y Mayor ATTEST: e ADVERTISE ON SEPTEMBER 13 SEPTEMBER 20 15-7 1 l G: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAA1014GA STAFF REPORT DATE: SepteLber 7, 1988 zcL TO: City Council and City Manager ��C FRON: Puissell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to annex Lots 4 through 12 inclusive of Tract 8583, located on Monte Vista Court, east of Eastwood Avenue and west of Hellman Avenue, to Landscape M41ntenance District No. 1 and setting the date of public hearing for October S. 1988 RECONVIDATION: It 1s recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for annexing Lots 4 through 12 inclusive of Tract 8583 and the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Landscape Maintenance No. 1. Background /Analysis In October, 1987, in response to an appeal by property owners to a staff decision to ellainato a traffic island on Monte Vista Court and an interest by the owners for landscaping in the island, Council directed staff to review the feasibility of constructing landscaping on the traffic island in question. It was determined that for this landscape protect to be constricted, the City's policy of annexing the benefited properties into a landscape maintenance district Should occur. Budget constraints in the 1987 -88 Capital Protects Budget made it Impossible to pursue the landscape protect during that fiscal year. A neighborhood meeting was held on July 26, 1988, with the owners of the lots which would directly benefit from the construction of the landscaping. That meeting addressed the owner's concerns and questions including the City's requirement of those properties benefiting from the proposed landscaping to be annexed into the City -wide landscape maintenance district (Landscape Maintenance District Ho. 1) along with a discussion of possible landscape treatments which could be employed. It was also explained that an annexation of the benefiting lots would include all the to s considered and that while future years assessments cannot be determined at this time, the 1988 -89 fiscal year assessment is approximately $25 per lot per yaar. 131 City Council Staff Report September 7, 1988 Page 2 ra A petition was circulated among the owners affected: Those signing the petition expressed a willingness to join the maintenance district upon construction of the landscaping. Of the 9 parcels affected, owners of 4 f: parcels signed the petition for a 443 response willing to join the district. i A vote of the affected owners is net ,'required for the annexation to occur. The City Council begins the process through a public hearing. The petition determines where' there is` a desire for the owners,to join the maintenance of a landscape project in the island. if annexation of the properties occurs; staff will review the 1988419 Midyear Capital Projects Budget and reprogram the funds necessary to design and construct the project. Adoption of the two - resolutions in question trill declare Council's intent to annex the properties into the maintenance district and establish a date for hearing objections to the annexation. Respec s bmitted, / �`�' RHM:MS: Attachment 131 a RESOLUTION W0. $ $ - s`fa A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE OF TRACT 8583 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, un September 7, 198x, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to sake and file with the City Clerk of said City a report In writlna as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the Ci y Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufffeIent, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in arty respect. NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estivate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and des—Tn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said — Assessment District to proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report 1s hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fo�� puposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. e—�- 140 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. Annexation for Tract 8583 (Lots 4 - 12 inclusive) SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No.l. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 8583 ( Lots 4 - 12 inclusive) as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are sham on the recorded Nap as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditfon3 of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the indiv!dual development is hereby made a part of this re vert to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4 Estimated Casts All isprovezents will be constructed by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysts and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Currently the approximate cost per dwelling unit is $25.00 per year. It is anticipated that such costs will remain the same with this annex clon. Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. 141 IA�?% SECTION S. Assessmet- Diagram ;t A coQy�of theF groppoosed•assessmcnt diagram is attached to_this report and, labeled Exhibit , by.thfs'reference the diagram is hereby incorporated• 1 within the text of thts• report. + 6 "V. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for,the,Ofstrict are :found to be of general benofib to all lots within the Ofstrtct ind.that:assessecht shall be,equal unit.; -for-each Where there is more than one•dwelling'unit per'lotUor parcallof asses .sable land, the assessment for'each'lotLor parcel shall be proportional to the -' number of dwelling units'per'lot-or'parcel. L The City Council will hold a public hearfng in June, to determine the actual cssessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal-year which we to'be recovered through assessments as required y the Landscape and Lighting Art of 1972. SECTI09 7. Order of Events 2 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's = Report. ; 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engireer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. IA�?% t a b i'. Properties and ieprovmnts to be included within Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No: 1: XURTAINED AREA. _ TRACT D/U iDYC —mr- ' 8583 9 Monte Yista Median -- 21,864 2 (Lots 4 -12 Incl.) M 143 .a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. i tO 1— "' () O y �Y) ) 1 J e tl ;J I Pr �• 0 no a L1. a,-mr)10f L+ f I tAi N 1 ppR a 11 ' 11 � (U1�1 n _bN9 M r it ii r �a t' 0 x t.1 1 OO a mot. Ir O Annexation of Lob a thru 12 Inclusive of itaOt 80563 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIOI�CA title, � � $ ENGINEERING DIVISION T k N „n 3 VICINITY MAP page o! gy1 o . y �Y) ) 1 J e tl ;J I Pr �• 0 no a L1. a,-mr)10f L+ f I tAi N 1 ppR a 11 ' 11 � (U1�1 n _bN9 M r it ii r �a t' 0 x t.1 1 OO a mot. Ir O Annexation of Lob a thru 12 Inclusive of itaOt 80563 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIOI�CA title, � � $ ENGINEERING DIVISION T k N „n 3 VICINITY MAP page RESOLUTION N0. 5�J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION To ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 90. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; PURSUANT To THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING 06JECTIOXS THERETO NON, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. convenience requ re maintenance district operation of those pi greenbelt purposes BI boundaries of the pn hereof. Said maintei any sprinkler system, lighting, structures, Mescrt tion of Work: That the i s e n n on of tills In the City of Rancho Cucamong trays and faciliites thereon deed or recorded subdivision tosed maintenance district des ince and operation includes th trees, grass, plantings, land and walls in connection with Interest and auncil to fora a he maintenance and ad for common aP within the in Section 2 and supervision of . ornamental SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wiiTi n�roadway�ggFio and landscaping easerenis of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumarated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation of Lots 4 through 12 inclusive of Tract No. 8583 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 11. SECTION 3. Description of Assesscent District: That the contemplate in oy ,,ono sa ty mono , is of more than local or c-dlnary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to PAY the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that ce�taln territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Nap of Annexation of Lots 4 through 12 inclusivo of Tract No. 8583 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. •, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the Proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. ,+!5 Na M SECTION d, wort o�f En�imer: The City Council of said City by Resolution ITo—IrF,as approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the awunt-of.thelproposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Bigineer's Report, Annexation of Lots 4 through 12 inclusive of Tract No. 85831to Landscape Maintenance District No. I' is on file in the office of the City Clerk,of safd City:., Reference to said report is hereby made for all particwlars'for -the amunt and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the York. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected awe arz me en in saaai manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shalt file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be detemined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing Notice is hereby given that on Octoberr 3; UW. at e�fi ouTi rof T:3o FW.-Tn the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to tiro work or extent of the hssestaunt district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the tie set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the pproperty described in the protests, then such protest must contain or ba acccapanied by written evidence that sech signer is the owner of the property so described. atu mN 1. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein PrOposed shall oe done and carried rougih gpursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California desi noted the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, buing Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be �pursuan ec on o e vernaen ode. The Hayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the saw to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Oniaar oi, C-ali ornta, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1,0140 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � STAFF REPORT AM - DATE: DATE: Septeeber 7, 1988 W60••_ ` TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to annex Tract Nos 8369, 8805 and 8806, located on the east side of Rochester Avenue between Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and setting the date of public hearing for October 5, 1988 RMON30ATICA: It is recoe nded that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Engineer's Report for annexing Tract Nos. 8369, 8805 and 8806 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's Intention to annex the above described tracts to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS In November, 1987, Council, in response to property owner's interest in getting landscaping improvements along the east side of Rochester Avenue, directed staff to review the feasability of such a project. It was determined that for this Landscape project to be constructed, the City's policy of annexing the benefited properties into a landscape maintenance district should occur. Budget constraints in the 1987 -88 Capital Projects Budget made it impossible to pursue the landscape project during that fiscal year. Following adoption of the 1988 -89 Budget, a neighborhood meeting was held on July 27, 1988, with the owners of the three tracts which would directly benefit from the construction of the landscaping. That meeting addressed the owners concerns and questions including the City's requirement of those properties benefiting from the proposed landscaping to be annexed into the City -wide landscape maintenance district (Landscape Maintenance District No. 1) along with a discussion of possible e landscape which xplained that an ann xatiion of thethree benefitn employed. acts would include All lots within those tracts and that while future years assessments cannot be determined at this time, the 1988 -89 fiscal year assessment is approximately $25 per lot per year. 14:07 M, SeptaMer 7, 1999 Page 2 Y Y A Petition was: circulated- among,�the rwners affected.: Those sfgnfng..the petition expressed a11r1111ngness,_to;join the'maintenanco district upon construction of thej4landscaping. "Of,'the 412 parcels affected, owners of 252 parcels signed- tlie'Petition fora 61% response willing to3join the , district. A vote of the affect [ad'owners,is not' required for the annexation to occur. The City Coupcil, begins the -process through a public hearing. The petition detentnls. whether there is' a desire'for tie owners to join the maintenance dislrlct and thereby, support the maintenance' of a landscape project on-,the east 'side of Rochester., If annexation of the properties occurs, sUff.wlll review the 198849'Midyear Capital Projects' Bud et and reprogramil the funds necessary to design and construct the protect. Adoption of the two resolutions in question wilt declare Council's intent to annex the properties into the maintenance district and establish a date for hearing objections to the annexation. Respe 1 s tted, RH(lf5•:d1+� Attachment NO a , 's RESOLUTION N0. 2% _ S VL` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIpNG, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION OF TRACTS 8369, 88D5 AND 8806 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTPICT NO. 1 NIDEREAS, on September 7, 1988, the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses odd ork and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of there are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and des—c-rTFe-4rTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That tho proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saf -J sessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said retort shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for-U purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 1 479 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation for Tracts 8369, 8BO5 and 0806 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, 04vtsion 18 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance Of3trfct No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tracts 8369, 8805 and 8806 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the Individual development is hereby made a part of this re port to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs All improvements will be constructed by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.30) cents per square foot per year. lhese costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Currently the approximate cost per dwelling unit is $25.00 per year. It is anticipated that such costs will remain the samo with this annexation.. Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. 60 .i SECTION S. Assessaront 0lecram A d E of the Qro pysthis assessment referen reference diagram i hereby incorporated�d labeled Exhibit A , b within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where nd, the assessment to eachdlotlorp per assessable comber of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the b previous fiscal and Lighting Act of recovered hrough assessments as required y o ? SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary APprov:i of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. nd 3 detteerminesito Annex toptheiDistrictgor abandon thelproceed ngs. 4 Every year in Hay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the fndlvfduel assessments. 151 169— 6+ :�yt XLL- tyr'Y,�T Properties and iaprovenents to be included with this Annexation to Landscape °- Maintenance District No. 1: - MAINTAINED AREA ;n 8805 99 Rochester Ave. — 12,826 58 rr 8806 122 Rochester Ave. — 15,236 69 8369 191 Rochester Ave. --- 23.760 108 412 - -- 51,821 235 169— 6+ :�yt RESOLUTION NO. " 5 7� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE. MAINTENANCE, DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMW DISTRICT;, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING 08JECTIOrr1 THERETO ' tC NON, THEREFORE the City'Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ^' hereby resolves, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State V of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri Lion of Work: That the public interest and canvenience�—re an s e n nti_, of this City Council to fors a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faci111tes thereon dedicated for cocoon greenbelt purposes y dead or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located OUR yTyit---5T-- ay and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation of Tracts 8369, 8805 and 8806 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 10. SECTION 3, Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, in The opinion o sa Mu—n—=, is of more than local or ordf nary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation of Tracts 8369, 8805 and 8806 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. 154 r� SECTION 4. Apbort of En sneer: The City Council of said City by Resolution of—. a-Fas apprOved the report of the engineer of work which report,., indicates the amount of,tha• proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Pmexation of Tracts 8369, 8805 and 8806 to Landscape Maintenance District No. V. is an file in the cffice of the City Clerk of said City. •Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the emount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. + I - SECTIONS. Ccileetlon of Assessments: The assessment shall be collects a sane me an n scam manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular nesting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Tire and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on October-F71996. ir-19e our o in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to V.e work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or w10� said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and oust be delivered to the City Clerk of said Cfty prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown open the last equalized assessmeA roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or ho accompanied by mitten evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca Ina and Liqhtfnq Act of 1972: All the work herein propo Fall be don& and eery a pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma& —pursuant to section 61961 of the Goverment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Oail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Untar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. e 1� ' , i1 +V.e.4�yrN�4- y.".�e'.'iW:?:�ax � ='a: =- _..{ _ _ _ •.t:` —., •. _ri- +'� ^::i:eyF�vu +:• . , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7i,1988 TO: City Council and City Manger 7ROM: Russell H. Haguire, City Engineer BY: Joe Stafa, Jr., Associate Civfl Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATION To CONDITIONS OF-APPROVAL FOR TENTATIYF TRACT M - - eal. of the rMning, s'i sian decision reduir ng {he pAyeent of in- 1 ieu fees' for future undergrounding of existing ,overhead utilities along Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue -far`& subdivision of 6.87 acres of land, into 19 MnyyI lots in the Low Residential Dlstriet (2 -4 dwellf per acre), located west of the intersection of Avenue and Highland Avenue (APN E01- 711 -01, 02, 03) Staff recommends that this item be set for a public hearing on the October 5, 1988 City Council agenda. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 13367 (H)dlflcation) was approved by the Planning Comfssion on August 10, 1988.' This action has been appealed to the City Council, and as such requires that a public hearing be set. To allow for publication and mailing of Notices of the Hearing, a public hearing should be scheduled for the regular City Council meeting of October a, 1958. Respectf submitted, rmj Attachment 15(o l .4+ etti ;� k t .1-n I _v t8a 3P Al n Augiat 'g, Pil City aZ' Rancho Cu* camong& P.O. Box # 807• i,' Rancho Cucdmonsa.! Ca. 91730 Attn: Comoullity Development Depfrtment PlannLia Division Be: Tract 13367 Md. Kelly Orta: I am in receipt of Your letter dated August 15, 1988 wherein I was informed that the planning commission denied our requoilt for a modification- -to -. the tract map as it- relates to Undergrounding utilities. I have discussed the denial wi t he Property owner and be had requested that we a;;paal this decision to the City Counail it is cur contention that this property owner in treated unfairly by the restrictive interproUtior, of tne guidelines as they are -written and does not give adequate consideration for the unique and restrictive configuration of tile Property Auditionally we have been informed that none of the adjacent developments have Paid these fees and feel that with this in mind our case should be reovaluaned Thank You for your time and cooperation, 2MI PV(DSuI4kMWtCALXb&k92SM?U 6MR&M , ORDINANM NO. 366 AY ORDINANCE OF in QTY muNCIL 01 THE CITY OF RANCHO CRCAMD1ic.A, CALIFORNIA. AMZHDINC TITWI 17, mum 17.08, OP THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL ODDS ESTABLISHING MINIMUM REQUIRED SIZES FOR MLTI- PA14MY DFt7.LINGS WHEREAS. on the 17th day of August, 1988, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Covernment Coda. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga doeu ordain as follwst SECTION 1t The Rancho Cutamooga City Council has found that thin project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 17, 1908. SECTION 2t Section 17.08.040B, Minimum Duelling Unit Size, is amended to read as follwot hA single family duelling less than 1,000 sq. ft. my be authorized when a development exhibits innovative qualities in tract, plot end architectural design through the approval of a Conditional Use Penmit. 'Senior citizen projects are exmpted from this requirement. JTO assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project, the following percentage limitaL one of the total number of units shall apply$ 10 percent for Rfficiency/Studio and 35 percent for One Bedroom or up to 35 percent combined. Subject to a conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or coe- badroom units vben a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balsoca mix of unit sizes and types. I FL L IN M RTH B Minimum Dwelling Unit Sirei Single family attached and deteched dwellings 1.000 sq. ft." regardless of district Multiple family dwal21nga 1 - Efficiency/Studio 5�O sq. ft. regardless of district - One bedroom 650 Sq. ft. ragardless of district - Two bedroom 600 sq. ft. regardless of district - Three or more bedrooms 950 sq, ft, regardless of district hA single family duelling less than 1,000 sq. ft. my be authorized when a development exhibits innovative qualities in tract, plot end architectural design through the approval of a Conditional Use Penmit. 'Senior citizen projects are exmpted from this requirement. JTO assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project, the following percentage limitaL one of the total number of units shall apply$ 10 percent for Rfficiency/Studio and 35 percent for One Bedroom or up to 35 percent combined. Subject to a conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or coe- badroom units vben a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balsoca mix of unit sizes and types. I 0rdinancs No. 366 page 2 SECTION 3t Sectian 17.08.040C, Minimum Dwelling Unit Size, is amended to read u follwat , L LM M MR R Minimum D,ellimg Unit Sizah Single family attached and 1.000 sq. ft.g regardless of district detached dwellings Multiple family duallingoti ft. regardless of disteet - Efficianty /Studio N/R 550 sq. N/R 650 eq. tt. -regardless of district - Ono badrom N/R g00 sq. ft. regardless of.distriet - Two bodrom N/g 950 sq. ft. regardless __ district - Throe or more badromn gA single family dwelling less than 1.000 zq. ft. may bo authorised ,ben a dwolopmout exhibits innovative qualities in tract, plot and azebitcctural design through tbu approval of a Conditional Use permit • h8enior citizen projects are =meted ft= minimum unit sires mrs& or iTo assure that ®roc lutes@ limitations of the total numbereof units project, the following Pe 8 shall apP17t 10 percent toioa Conditional percent for one rmit` othe or up to 35 M authorize a greater ratio oL efficiency or one- bedrom Planning CmsiBeiOP may qualities and n balance mix units when a developmnnt exhibits innovative design of unit sizes and types. SECTION 4z The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall oncaeio ThoaOCily Rnport,ieaonewspaperfoftgeneral 'circulation published gInn the enet City of On[ario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. I 5 ORDINANCE N0. 361 AN ORDDMCS OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPR(RINC INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01 E7L °ANDTHG THE BOONOARMS OF SUBAREA 3 (GENERAL IYMUM 2/L) TO INCLUDE PORTIONS Op THE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTS. BETWEEN HEIJJWN AND VINEYARD. CURRHNIILY LOCATED IN SOBAREA 2 (GENERAL INDuSCRIAL) WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of June, 1988, the Planning Commission initiated the above - described projects and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of July. 1988, the Planning Cmaiseion held a duly advertised public hearing putsuatt to Section 65664 of the California Government Code, and recommended to the City Council approval of this Amendmant. SECTION 13 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has made the following findingsr 1. That the properties identified in Exhibit "A" am part of the Industrial Specific Plan= and 2. That the subject property is suitable for the nstn permitted in the Industrial Specific Plan in terms of access, size, and compatibility with azietitg land use in the surrounding area; and 3. That the proposed subarea boundary will not have significant impact on the arvaromant, cot the surrounding properties; one 4. That the proposed change is in coarormance with the General Plan. SECTION 21 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found that this project will tot create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 17, 1988. SECTION 32 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follatat 1. That pursuant to Section 65050 through 65855 of the California Covernment Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 17th day of August, 1988, Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 88 -01 as outlined in Exhibits "B" and "C". ' (01 t i Ordimmce No. 367 Page 2 SECTION 47 The Mayor ahall sign this Otdiaance and the City Clad @ball cause tha @aae to be published within fifteen W) days after its Passage at least once in The Onily RaDOrt. a newspaper of ganeral circulation published in the City of Ontario, California. and circulated in the City of Nanchn Cucanongs. California. ItoI r I FIG. IV-4 Ordinance No. 36 Page 3 to be inckdsd in subarea 3 ,J m.uuerwn TRARS /ROUrU 120' R.O.W. 0000 Padeemm a•oaawOW, Cre*ks A Chamel• t� IOW R.O.W. 0 • • • ek" o as, or lots R.O.W. 00=1 v � �/ R. SERVICE E:�� .+i-}- d ping tuaD•i ACCO La Aeeots FdMe V I (off EXHIBIT A 0 400' 600, 1600' ITha 96w atm m rM not as emwWy ow"d not IS Me '.. r. Phrcal VMS and W conRprafkne ..0 Oft SaSCYL 4he I p', go of a tft• N an are shown as al"WORImatIon only. n of adh sk" or•r tl'IN ttla CR sai ragmat la. y 0i Y " Ocdiunc• No. 367 RIO. IV -digs 4 Y c subs loRnansaanl :RAILS fROUTIs 120' R.O.W. U O O O POdaebsan 100• R.O.W. 0 0 • 0 sk)clo Se' at Mss R.O.W. ('T/�q Raliaw E Iss tsla Bridge Propped 0 aw,,w * "'u,b cYsaks L cRarotsts m PWk1 SOSeW sk"tocaPa/ Accata potnb kafldg Cow 3 ExNIgEr B c dPOt Soot tecot 'The br fioGwn se v %n pry mt ba uc m of armed nor b the guest nnan and r ima t*4 Ol n df S +TM 080=m r000 ut a m b o an uo atecwn a$ aDWOSYnat �, i �.t%fad A+W neod ttt� ms7 bs edJw•tOd dive #b-4 ss tM Ci y dovefte. Y La I• ;�� <. . app. <arr. +•�� r.. ORDINANCE N0. 368 AN ORDINANCE OF ITIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CICAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AME)M W 88-03, A:ffifmING FIGURE 5 -18 PERTAINING TO COMMUN17T TRAILS WBERP.AS, on the 13tb day of July, 1988, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearing pursant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recommended to the City Council mending Figure 5 -18 of the Etivanda Specific Man pertaining to Community Trails; and WHEREAS, on the 17th day of August. 1998, the City Council bald a duly advertised public hearing to Section 65834 of the California Gweraeent Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council bun made the following findings? 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted within the district in terms of access. size, and compatibility with existing land ones in the surrounding area: and 2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding proportion; and 3. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found that this project vill not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approvos issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 17. 1988. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cueanoaga bereby ordains as follows: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 through 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 17 day of August, 1988. Etivanda Specific Plan Amendment 88-03, amending Figure 5 -18 pertaining to Community Trails as &home on the attached Exhibit eA% 1 l05 n i Ordinance No, 368 �'�'-Z Page 2 1, ,,. SECTION 48 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shale cause the aaae to be published within fifteen (15) days after ins passage at least once in Yhs Daili Resort, a newspaper of general circulation published =; in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho r Cucamonga. California. I 6 EXHIBIT A Ordinance Ho. 368 Page 3 AN ORDINANCE OF 188 CITY COUNCIL 08 THE CITY O1 RANCHO COCAMNGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88-02. A REQUEST 10 ESTABLISH A CONSISTENT CALL DESIGN AND SSTBACB FOR EAST AVENUE MEWS, on the 11th day of Nay. 1988, the Manning Comeiosion held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recommended to the City Council mending the Etivanda Specific Man to establish a consistent wall design and setback for East Avenue; and >'+ WHEREAS. on the 17th day of August, 1988, the City Council bald a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Govarmaat Coda. SECTION l: The Rencho Cucamonga City Council hag made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted within the district In terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed Specific plan Amendment would not have significant impact@ on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed Specific Man Amendment is in conformance with the General Man. SECTION 2: ^she Rancho Cucamonga City Council ban found that this project vill not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 17. 1968. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follwa: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 through 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bereby approves on the 17th day of August. 1988. Btivanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -02, establishing a tonaintent wall design and cotbatk for East Avenue by modifyi.g Figure 5-228 and adding Figure 5 -29A as indicated on the attached Exhibits *Ae and `Be. I (01 r ire jp ORDINANCE N0. 369 AN ORDINANCE OF 188 CITY COUNCIL 08 THE CITY O1 RANCHO COCAMNGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88-02. A REQUEST 10 ESTABLISH A CONSISTENT CALL DESIGN AND SSTBACB FOR EAST AVENUE MEWS, on the 11th day of Nay. 1988, the Manning Comeiosion held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recommended to the City Council mending the Etivanda Specific Man to establish a consistent wall design and setback for East Avenue; and >'+ WHEREAS. on the 17th day of August, 1988, the City Council bald a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Govarmaat Coda. SECTION l: The Rencho Cucamonga City Council hag made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted within the district In terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed Specific plan Amendment would not have significant impact@ on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed Specific Man Amendment is in conformance with the General Man. SECTION 2: ^she Rancho Cucamonga City Council ban found that this project vill not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 17. 1968. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follwa: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 through 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bereby approves on the 17th day of August. 1988. Btivanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -02, establishing a tonaintent wall design and cotbatk for East Avenue by modifyi.g Figure 5-228 and adding Figure 5 -29A as indicated on the attached Exhibits *Ae and `Be. I (01 r Ordinance No. 369 Page 2 SECTION At The Mayor aboll sign this Ordinance and the City Clark aball cause the alas to be publiahed within tifteca (15) dsye`aftar its passage at least once in The Doily Report, a neuapaper of general ctrculatiou published in tha City of omt' rip. celiicmis, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucmouga, California, < -ri- t (09 ■D AST Al WALL •1 EXHIBIT 'A' OrdiwIIGS EAST AVENUE FIG 5-28 J-10 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 1 Ord=auce No. 367 Page 4 Emma 'B' Y cc IL co W N X a a " laaa a W 111 ORDINANCE NO. 370 5 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, does ordain as follower A. Recitals. (i) First City Properties and the City of Rancho Cucamonga have filed an application for Etivanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 88-01 as describ..d in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, tb4 subject Etivanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the applieatioc.a (1!) On the 22nd of June. 1988 tha Planning Cammiarian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the meeting to the 13th day of July. 19881 and (iii) On the 17th of August, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public bearing. concluded said hearing an that date{ and heard and considered the Planning Commission raccmcaadation or apprwalt and (iv) All legal prerequisites to adoption of th!a amendment have occurred. B. Ordinance. NON. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals. Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. M AN ORDINANCE OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAH WA. ±'. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS!@ff AND'1 ETTwA=& BIBCIFIC PLAN Am4Dumner 88-01 TO WIDL4 CHERRY .+, AVENUE FROM 24TH STREET (SOIDIIT AVENUE) TO INTERSTATE 15 FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A hE=MARY ARTERIIL AND TO DESIGNATE AS SPECIAL DESIGN STRQTg THE ABOVE PORTION OF CHERRY AVERUE, AS VELL AS 24TH STREET BETWEEN THE LOOP ih ROAD AHD CHERRY AVENUE AND THE LOOP ROAD (FXHISITS 1 AND 2) t AND TO AHM THE TRAILS NAP TO RELOCATE A PORTION OF IRE EQUESTRIAN TRA11. To THE HORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET (SOlDIIS APENBi AND TO DELETE A PORTION ALONG 24TH STREET BSTNEEN CHERRY AVEUE AND THE EASTERN BOUNAURY OF THE i, CITf AND TO ESTEOI THE BICYCLE TRAIL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STRESY FROM EAST AV$RB TO THE EASTER.`? BOUNDARY OF THB CITY (ETHL9IT 3) 5 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, does ordain as follower A. Recitals. (i) First City Properties and the City of Rancho Cucamonga have filed an application for Etivanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 88-01 as describ..d in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, tb4 subject Etivanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the applieatioc.a (1!) On the 22nd of June. 1988 tha Planning Cammiarian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the meeting to the 13th day of July. 19881 and (iii) On the 17th of August, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public bearing. concluded said hearing an that date{ and heard and considered the Planning Commission raccmcaadation or apprwalt and (iv) All legal prerequisites to adoption of th!a amendment have occurred. B. Ordinance. NON. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals. Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. M Ordiamca No. 370 ' Page 2 2. Sued upon substantial evidence presented to thin Council during the above- referenced meetings, including oral and written staff reports, thin } Council hereby specifically finds as follwas (a) An increase in circulation will occur as it result of the development of the Huntersa Ridge project in the City of Fontana. Therefore. public safety requirements necessitate the widening of the described portion of Merry Avenue from collector street to a secondary arterial= and i• Purthermore, the described portion of Cherry Avenue, as wall as 24th Street (Summit Avenue) between the Loop Road and Cherry Avenue and the Loop Road serve as entryveys into the city, and therefore, need special design treatment under the Special Design Street designation; and (b) Tor safe access and other reasons, portions of the equestrian trail shall be located to the north side of 24th Street between the Loop Road and Cherry Avenue and the equestrian trail between Cherry Avenue and the eastern City licit shall be deleted; mid (e) For safe circulation and ocher reasons, a bicycle trail shall be located on the south aide of 24tb Street from East Avenue to the eastern City limit; and (d) These streets and trails are located adjacent to •,resently undeveloped land and flood control facilities in the northeast coxnor of the City; and (e) The above changes are illustrated in Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 attached to and included in this ordinance by reference; and (f) The application does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the policies and goals of the General Plan and with related development; and (g) The application promotes the policies and goals of the Etivanda Specific Plan. 3. nosed upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above referenced public hearings and upon the specific facts set forth it paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follwas (a) Tho application does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Etivanda Specific Plan; and Plan. (b) The application promotes the goals of the Etivanda Specific (-13 EP W, Ordinance No.'970: iY page 3 ry \ ` r 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the application been revieved and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Qenlity Act of 1970 and adopts a Negative Declaration. i. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 0 2 and 3 above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Outesonga. California, on Y the 17th day of August, 1988, hereby approves gtiwanda Specific plan Anandment 88 -01. 6. The Nayor shall aign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause ca the sue to be published within fifteen (15) days of ter its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cacamongs, California. 4 174 .A LOOP 60MNe 141h mW Ma !!mA m . SSTwSiN LOOP i CHERnr ry�pq�Q}�{ Fitt. 5-35A w2.50L�ii151' z°M�W7t 3. L:1tGtPi' rspr'I_�A�.ru t.w.•e �... CITY OF t 75 PLANNING DIVISION I�otf vCRTH RrUW. IT 10ROMMAICOV370 TrU: TER s��;iuvt EXHIBP_L�_ SC>LE ---6" BETW EN CL TREET 1 -15 Mr. IR_4 a r. CHERRY AVENUE FIGo 5 -36 CITY OF 1-7(o R-ILNlt y� ^L��• n*E%t _ORDf 1APUce -ESP�A 8'f! a/ PLANNING DIViSIOH EXHIBIT, /1z a zB� SCALE, f l� I r -- i i M T O -a- BICYCLE TRAIL EQUESTRIAN TRAIL eFreeway Access t1 -7 SEE ATTACHED LEGEND \MH CITY GF -77 RA2 CHD CL:CANIONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM oRD /- EsnA 88-7/ Trr Fl P ANRAN vAe EYHiErr, g3 v SCALE,. f ORDINANCE NO. 21—C Al ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUr$MGA, CALIFORNIA, ANE10III3 SECTION 5.04.150 OF THE RANCHU CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LICENSES; LATE PAYMENT PENALTIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY or WOW CUCAWNGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLONSs ,9FCTTON Is Section 5.04.150 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby emended to read, In words and figures, as followse w5.04.150 License taxe — Penalties for delinauenefes, Upon the failure to pay any license tax when due. the collector shall add a penalty of fifty percent (501) of such license tax then due and owing thirty (30) days after the due date thereof. For purposes of this section, computation of such thirty (30) days shall include all weekends and holidays except, if the thirtieth day thereof falls on a weekend or holiday, such thirtieth day shall be deemeJ to be the next full business day.w SCION 2e The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared Invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and of fact. SFCftON 31 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after Its passage at least once In ;he natty eeaeri, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Ir7U 3 R ORDINANCE No. 21 -C AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SEE CITY OF RANCHO C]CAMLw,A. CALIFORNIA. AMMINO SECTION 5.04.150 OF SEE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LIC3NSSS{ LATE PAYMENT PENALTIES SRS CITY COUNCIL OF SEE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOUSt SETT 1_t Section 5.04.150 of the Rancho Cucamooga Municipal Coda is hereby am 1, reed, in words and figures, as lollowst "5.04.150 License taxes - Yanaltiea for delioaueaciea. upon the failure to pay avy license iaz rhea due, the collector shall add a penalty of fifty portent (505) of such license tax then due and wing thirty (30) days after the due data thereof. For purposes of this section, computation of such thirty (30) days shall include all weekends and holidays except, if the thirtieth day thereof falls on a weekend or holiday. such thirtieth day shall be deemed to be the next full bosineso day." SECTION 23 The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragrsph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declarad invalid by any final court action in A court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation. the remaining provisions. sections paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance @ball remain in full fore and affect. SECTION 31 The City Clark shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance sod cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Roper . a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. Comm NO. 39 —C AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAIDNGAr CALIFORNIA, ADDING ARTICLE 10.50 TO 111LB 30 OF 't • THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL MDR Sb PROVIDE POP SIB } ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO WCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FMLCVS: SECTION 1: Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code in hereby aneuddd by adding a new Chapter 10.50. to be read. in words and figures. as follwet Chapter 10.50 `Permit Parking Districts" Sections: 10.50.010 Definitions 10.50.020 Designation of permit parking districts; Findings 10.50.030 Minimum size 10.50.040 Petitions 10.50.050 Signs 10.50.060 Exemption for permit holders 10.50.070 Ixgusuce of permits 10.51.080 Guest parking permits 10.30.090 Display of permit• 10.50.100 Exempt vehicles 10.50.110 Authority of Engineer 10.50.120 Dissolution of permit parking district 10.50.130 Penal provisions Section 10.50.010. Definitions. As used in this Chapter. the following tams shall have tht rollwing meanings: A "Eaginest" means the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or his or her designee. B. " Parmit Parking District" means an area established by resolution of the City Council wherein parking restrictions apply to all vehicles except vehicles •'•ich have been issuad a parking permit pursuant to this Chapter and vehicles e. pted by Section 10.50.100. C. "Resident" means a person who lives in a dwelling unit located within a permit Parking District. 1-79 V,;" -s Ordinance Ito. 39-6 Page 2 D. "G"sto ceens any parson visiting or intending to visit a resident in a Permit Parking District. r' Faction 10.50.020. Designation of Permit Parking Distsintss Bindings. The City resolution may establish Permit dariesg Districts by resolution. Aoy such sasolutioa shall designate the boundaries of the Permit i Parking District and shall specify the nature of the parkia8 limitations which apply within the district to operators of vahicleseother then vehicles e d tech have boon issued a permit pursuant to this Chapter, p f; this Chapter pursuant to Section 10.50.100. Peery such resolution shall be based on the findings as follwst 's A. Commuter vehicles, defined as those vehicles operated by M. persons whose destinations are to non - residential on" or "an, do or nay oubstantially, and .egularly interfere with tba use of the sajority of aysilabla parking spaces for use by residents; E. The interference by commuter vehicles occurs at regular and � significant daily or weekly intervals; C. That parking ing vehicles or are the sourcerOfdacraesonable of the proposed penis parking noise, traffic beaarde, environmental pollution or devaluation of real property in such proposed districts D. That seventy -five percent (755) of the residents within the Proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking Privileges (unless established by City Council action in absence of a Patition)s E. That no unreasonable displacement of consumer vehicles will result into sorromdiag residential areas= P. That no alternative solution, other then the establishment of the permit parking district, is feasible or practical. Saction 10.50.030. Hinimna size. Permit Parking Districts shall contain at least four 4 blocu or st least ono (3) mile curb frontage. Section 10.50.040. Petitions. Residents may PecitiOu the City Council for the astsbliahing of a Permit Parking District. Any Ouch petition shall designate the boundaries of the proposed district and shall be signed by at least seventy -five percent (75%) of the residents within the proposed district. Such a petition shall be filod with the Engineer who shall prepare a report to the City Council on the proposed district, including the Eng ineer'a recommendations regarding the catabliabment thereof. The Engineer awl forwd thisareecion shalltbeeconstrued coelimiitttthe authority of Nothing in the City Council to establish a permit Parking District in the absence of such a petition. is I Ordinance No. 39 —C Page S ; .n :v Section 10.50.050. Signs. Upon the astabliebmant of a Parmie Parking r' District, the ¢nginaar shall cause appropriate signs to be erected in the district, indicating thereon the parking limitation applicable to the district and the exemption therefrom of vehicles with pewits. The regulations pertaining to any Pormit Parking District shall not apply until signs or r markings giving adequate notice thereof have been placed. V e w' Suction 10.50.060. $motion for Permit Holders. She parking - ,t S limitations impoaed within a Parmf.t Parklag District pursuant to this Chapter w shall not apply to vebielts for which a parking permit pertaining to that district has been issued and displayed in the manner prescribed in Section 10.50.090. No such permit shall reserve any particular parking place within the district to the holder of the permit. Each such permit shall be valid only for the Permit Parking district for which it is issued. 'S Section 10.50.070. Isauanee of Parfits. Applications for permits to park within a Pewit Parking District may be made by any resident within such district. Such applications @ball be filed with the Engineer. Unless otherwise prescribed by the resolution establishing the district, not more than three (3) permits (exclusive of guest parking permits) shall be issued to residents of any oiagle dwelling unit. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Engineer may appeal such decision to the Ciq Manager, wheat decision on the matter shall be final. Section 10.50.080. Cueet parking Permits. unless otherwise prescribed in tee resolution establisbing a Permit Parking District, arch resident holding a parking permit shall be entitled to receive guest parking permit forms free the Engineer. She use of guest parking permits shall be designated in the resolution establishing the Permit Parking District. Section 10.50.090. Display of Permits. A. A parking permit issued pursuant to this Chapter (otbe then e guest parking permit) shall be permanently affixed to the lower driver side of the inside of the rear window of the vehicle for whisk it was issued. B. Guest parking permits shall be displayed face up on the driver front dashboard of the vehicle for which it van issued. Suction 10.50.100. Exempt web else. The following vehicle■ arm exempt from the parking restrictions applicable to any Permit Parking Districts A. Repair, maintenance, refuse collection, utility, dolivaty and service vehicles being used in the course of business. B. Vehicles Owned or operated by any governmental agency, or contractor of a gwerumautal agency. being used in the course of business. C. Emergency. life support and health care vehicles being used in the course of business. 1061 Ordinance No. 39-C Page 4 Section 10.50.110. AuthoritXoof the Ent{ near. The Roginear is outborised to establish rules and procedures and to produce signs, forms and other materials necessary or appropriate eo implement the provisions of this Chapter. Section 10.50.120. Dienolution of Permit Parking Districts. The City Council ray, by resolution6 terminate and dissolve any previously established Pa=ir Parking District. Section 10.50.130. Penal Provisions. A. Unless "mpted by the provisions of thin Chapter no peraon shall stand or park a motor vehicle in any Permit Parking District in violation of any parking restrictions established pursuant to this Chapter. B. No pence shall falsely represent himself or herself as eligible for a parkfmg penis or furnish false information to the Engineer or his represertatives in an application for a parking permit. C. No person who has bean issued a parking permit @ball thereafter allow the use thereof by any other person. D. No person shall copy, produce, create or use any facsimile or counterfeit parking permit. E. Any act or omission declared unlawful by the provisions of this Chapter is an infraction punishable by a fine not to "coed that net by the current uniform county -vide bail schedule established pursuant to the teems of the California Vehicle Code. "y SECTION 2s If any section, subsecticu. sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ocdinance is for any reason held to be invalid at unconstitutional by the docimion of any court or competent jurisdiction or Preemptive legislation, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section. subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses. phrases, or portions be declared invalid, unconstitutional or prompted. SECTION 3s The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause tie sane to be published within fifteen (15) days after its paoeage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in Lbe City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Crlifornia. V STAFF REPORT q DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: City Council and City K.nager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMERT SYSTEM CONTRACT ANENDMElET RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt an Ordinance authorizing the City of Rancho Cucamonga to amend its contract with the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), to provide the third level of Survivors Benefit Coverage. BACKGROUND: As part of the employee benefit package approved by Council on June 28. 1988, an increase in the 1959 Survivors Benefit program was authorized. The PERS amendment process is a multi -phase process. The first step was adoption of a Resolution of Intention to amend the PERS contract. Council took this action and on August 17, 1988, adopted Resolution number 88 -504, which authorized staff to proceed with the PERS contract amendment process. This documentation wilt be forwarded to PERS. At that time, the PERS Contract Administration Division will prepare the contract amendment and wait until the Ordinance is adopted before concluding the process. The cost to the City is approximately $7,895 for Fiscal Year 1988/89. Respectfully submitted. t, � , Elizabeth Stoddard Finance Manager ES :cm Attached Ordinance 1$3 f ■ 2. Public Agency shall participate In the Public Employers' Retirement System tree and after January 28, 1978 making its employees as hereinafter prcvided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are nct provided for herein and to all amendmants to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contract - Ing agency 1 Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become meaDers of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members) 1 Is. addition to the clacsas of employees excluded from membership by Said Retirement raw, the following classes of employees Shall not become members of said Retirement Systems a. EXCLUDE AL.. SAFETY EMPLOYEES. _n Yl,fl AMEHMM. TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE OOARD Or ADMINISTRATION rV' Or THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL. Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONUA The Board of Administration, Public Employeea' Reticeeent System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of above, public agency: hereinafter referred,to as Public Agency, having entered Into a contract effective January 28, 1978, and witnessed January 26, 1978, and as amended effective September 22, 1980 and November 160 19a1, which provideb for participation of Publle Agency In said System, Board and Public Agency hereby eggs as follower • A. Paragraphs t through 9 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed affective November 16, 1981, and hereby replaced by the following plragraphs numbered 1 through 10 inclusive - 1. All words and terms used herein which art defined In the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided Normal retirement age- shall mean age 60 for local miscellaneous members. 2. Public Agency shall participate In the Public Employers' Retirement System tree and after January 28, 1978 making its employees as hereinafter prcvided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are nct provided for herein and to all amendmants to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contract - Ing agency 1 Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become meaDers of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members) 1 Is. addition to the clacsas of employees excluded from membership by Said Retirement raw, the following classes of employees Shall not become members of said Retirement Systems a. EXCLUDE AL.. SAFETY EMPLOYEES. C O P Y " a e 5. The fraction of final cospansation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined In accordance with Section 21251.13 of said Retirement Law (21 at age 60 full). 6. The following additional provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law, which apply only upon election of a contracting agency, Shall apply to the Public Agency and Its employeast r a. Section 20024.2 (One -Year Final Compensation) b. Section 20930 3 (Military Service credit), as defined In Chapter 7 830, Statutes of 1976. r\ '( Da Sections 21022/21022 1 (Industrial Disability Retirement) for ,a local miscellaneous membecs. i d section 2L399 (Increased Non- Induetrlel Olseb!]!ty Allowance). a, a Sections 21380 - 21387 (1959 Survivor Benefits) Including Section V= 21382.4 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) h f section 20614, statutes 01 1978, (Reduction of Normal Member Contribution Rate) Pros September 22. 1980. through November 15, 1981, the normal local miscellaneous member contribution rate Q shall be 01 4Q 9 Section 20614, Statutes of 1980, (To Prospectively Revoke Section q`. 20(14, Statutes of 19781 7 Pub.1c Agency. In accordance with Government Code Section 20759, stall not be considered an 'employer- for purposes of the Public Employees' Retirement Law Contributions of the public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided In Government Code Section 20759, and such cont:'butlons hereafter sad@ shall be hold by the Board as provided In Government Code Section 20759 e Public Agency shall Contribute to said Retirement System as follows a With respect to local miscellaneous members, the agency shall contribute the following percentages of salaries earned as members of said Retirement System: (1) 6.738 percent until June 30. 2000 on account of the liability for current rervlee benefits. (Subject to annual change ) b Public Agency shall contribute $3 00 per employee on account of the liability for the 1959 Survivor Program provided under Section 21382 4 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change ) In addition, nil Camera and ltabl:ltles of Public Agency and Its employees shall be pooled In a single account, based on teem Insurance totes, for benefielaries of all local miscellaneous members • . _ : , ' - .�..��;�a; - - - - --_ _ - - -- --- - -- -- �� -...._ -><' a -� C O P Y a s s' - °•: '+ ' r-r `+ C. bli SSnounte as Llzad by the Board, payable In one !n- -••c. _ stallmenhwithln 60 days of data of contract to cover the Costs If adwlnletering said System as It affects the employees of Public Agency. not Including the costa of special valuations or of the peclodle investigation and valuations required by law, d A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable In one In- stallment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic lnverilgatlon and valuations required by law. 9 Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subjert to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to-the Public toployees' letlrement Lave and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic Investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. ,IC 10. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shell be '} paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within thirty days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as coy be prescribed by Board regulation. If mote or less than the correct amount of contribution Is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall os made In connection with subsequent remittances. x+ Adjustments on account of errors In contributions required of any �+ employee may be code by direct payments between the employee and the Board N, e. Thin amendtunt shall be offe a on the day of BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIR SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOg R �Va BY aQ` BY ASSISTANT BYOPCUi'IVE OFFICER Preeld lnq O[f lest .3 Ilk", Nltnass onto Attests 2 QO h� Clerq , PERS- CON -707 (AIIENDMENT) (Rev. 6/681 i t r� ORDINANCE ND. L� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING Ali AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BOARD Or ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' ¢ RETIREMENT SYSTEM. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1 That an amendment to the Contract between the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked 'Exhibit A', and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full. SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californ13, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency. SECTION 3 This Ordinar e s 11 take effect 30- after the date of its adoptioL and prior .Ao the xpfratloa of 1 a5�ys from the passage, re of shall be published it least once in the ,Ortfy Report, a ne sspaper of gene 1 circulation, published and circulat4d� 1n the City of Ra o Cucamonga Cat i fornia: and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and - effect. $7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1989 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRAY: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: HIM Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CfAMUN17Y DEVELOPUENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) GRANTEE Review o e use or oc ran un s nc i ng a status of funded Projects and achievement of local and federal goals. i. RECOMENOATION: In accordance with the requirements of the U.S. 11FP_ar5FnE__0_T Mousing and Urban Development (HUD), for CDBG recipients, staff and the ccnsultant, Michael Drandman Associates, Inc. (MA), have prepared a Grantee Performance Report (GPR) for the 1987 -88 CDBG program. Staff recommends approval of the report as required by federal regulation. 11. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the annual GPR is to provide an oPpor n for the City and HUD to evaluate the use of Block Grant funds and the status of programs for which funds were allocated. During fiscal year 1986 -87, expenditures for Block Grant projects showed significant progress. Housing rehabilitation loans and grants were again issued to low and moderate income homeowners throughout the City. Construction was completed on the east side of Turner Avenue. During the year, major steps were taken toward the development of a park in North Town , id the resolution of a drainage problem in the area. The park i e has been acquired on Feron Boulevard across from the interti..rmte stnool. Work has recently been completed to install the sto,z :,.dins necessary to permit development of the park. CDBG funds which were allocated to- the storm drain improvements an the east side of Turner Avenue have been reprogrammed for park construction (See 'Activity Summary' of the grantee performance repor� ) The grantee performance report indica. -s that the required benefit to low and moderate income residents h:c been attained and the goals of fair housing furthered. ITT. PUBLIC REVIEW: No comments have been received during the public _V r: per o , q p UD , aw IY. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends that the 1987 -88 MBG Grantee eP ormanCe— eport be approved and the report and Resolution of Approval submitted to the MJD. Respectfully ullly submitted, Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:MB:te Attachments: Community Development Block Grant Performance Report, 1987 -88 Fiscal Year 1009 is drantee parlormanoe Report as aLi.rrq.rl �� NM GIr IM >•� it ''pf OY�IY rneQn a.r rn 93.0 U10 line Po)E Pambo CYCOOQnga, Callrorala 91770 a)n•IYWa Ca 13 ✓QN FWb FP s Sms" FWn1••Wf.•a n-o ♦ •fA.aT a...w•.. I 011,1 —LOST" s SaMrI�T�/q,lra 1p flYrtOI.I/)1 s 10�NM 1M14 0a1fNN U,u{vf11y 0 {tqusN l.w••_IfYa I�Q 111111 / dM 0•.,rlKwKr•Iwla1 /If q I AgKwfbgl.TflNlft T.q /p TYTya /M1•wfl I QIPKINY PypIfHT .)N w1A W.ap1, H10) MY fMw701bI MAa1 WsI Tw.K.�.1 YP+PKI pPrYN.f w aW ). 7b AfoaT uN canuq¢ • •iMgN^aWMQ+gn•Nw.qler.q ✓Mw.r Ca•unwaY ywb•ww am Orp lL9Wr MQ)Ir T bcrM1 YwLrA ss.wsr.11 Nw1NMV MNM+C A M Ntt�PY Ogf{tw•• N.KI..pW qY Ha, COW •a.Yp •[Ywlf nNl •rq,. yNN M w P%PP• KMI W^ Y}+S N w!r prt.,Pp P a'R'.rPn N qUN Y IIPL P M,1 tPn.IWt/ na,a• N.Yq • /„4ayy.•')p.1T w A M I.MWY Q1.KbH wM{).,ayw, Pq w M)pO'.pq• 4.,•P f, pRMq r N ($IaO rW, PL1b0 M.• M PM. IN P ar„ f}.IKYPI ppQ.M 1•Y14Ypf.,a CI w fP1rw w (t GNKY4 wr b b PMM PuU pryla b.. y Mp•.111 /fpY Way.l 6 r . T IN NN/ N w.fHaN b Wprf w M Q.Wbf Ir(yq all,[b.a; w T bw IN Q�Y1M �•✓a PIr.Q• H• PPyM H • RM N II• •.M.bya w i • •gngf r fN CPTwIM• l,(IM W MOITI p I, Y•OK Iq laypf /1 a• /nNKnon. e ti10HnIH)IU1TPa•a 011K•N PfDro)Mli✓p CMIJiH TNt • n.•rpPlfP)p)p�I,rn.•poe•aw Hw•aw )Yq e r• M01. 1away.• Nw. wQlwbl• IMaa •wn1•.r/PITI.wwep•nuawagfwaw.a c rrern Hwx1 np1 waw,.new M CPw.w.T O,,,NIn•nl Rn bw IW W WaNn Nr Nt aH r4,a ro nee• •.nn•w.Pr M •w•nn r b[Y MYK.q b W^IIYrI a..11m.Ir •coww+•w,w w A.f1 a •s+a•roPi Ma N M Yp p MI TNr,•(p11f ipwlp W W iRpl• f/r. r•wia )r•w,af r )1Y H r w Iw•11 ar•• /.•, K.rFr LWY wGawg111.Nwa•r r✓ ttw1••••Ah 1•M•wra rrrrnMMwr ,awrPfwsrr,rwrlw•ar�wK.wi w...wj'IP,. r+�wwwriwrw:w� a°w'"i•s•Pru'"'^i.wwwi �...�'r11w�r°iss praasray,Nfrw MID•Mi 111Mi i Q /� r uA r•. nQ s Ti am) GRANTER PERFORMANCE REPORT No. 7 a. Assessment of Use of Commualbj Development Block Grant Funds In Relationship to City and National Community Development Objectives The 1987 -88 Community Development Black Grant Program committed the City of Rancho Cucamonga to two new public works projects and two on -going programs. In order to support these projects and programs, the majority of funds received and remaining unexpended from previous years, were budgeted to them. Feron Boulevard Street Imorovements Funds were set aside In 1986-87 to reconstruct the south side of Peron Boulevard adjacent to the proposed North Town Park site. The project was delayed when it was discovered that major drainage Improvements will have to be made prior to park development. However, completion Is expected In 1989. Housing Rehabilitation In 1982 -M the City established an on- going, multi-year Housing Rehabilitation loan program and a Senior Citlzen/Disabled Persons Repair Grant Program. The Housing Rehabilitation Loans Program offers below market Interest rate loons (with Interest written down by the City) to low and moderate Income homeowners for a maximum term of fifteen (15) years. The Senior Cltlzen/D)sabled Persons Repair Grant Program offers a non - repayable grant of up to $1,500 to Individuals or families that meet eligibility and Income requirements The rehabilitation loan program performance was less than expected In 1997 -88, despite newspaper advertisements, newsletter articles, and staff outreach to target groups. The City has, through Its program subcontractor (County of San Beroandlno Office of Economic and Comm"Ity Development) processed a number of applications, but only one home rehabilitation loan was funded. There were 38 emergency repair grants in addition. City Staff will work with County staff to ensure that performance continues to Increase next year. S9- thwest Cucamonga Street Improvements - via Carrillo The Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood is a target area because over half its households are low and moderate Income. By repairing and upgrading public Improvements in the area and offering low Interest loans and grants, the City hopes to encourage private investment In the area and ensure all residents a sate and pleasant living environment With the completion of the major needed public Improvements in the North Town neighborhood (the city's other eligible target area), the city council directed staff to shift the focus of CDBG funded Improvements to Southwest Cucamonga. The selection of projects for funding In 1987 -88 included a process of setting priorities among all ldent fled needed Improvements In the area Via Carrillo was selected as lan Grantee Perlormam!. Report page 2 the first street Improvement Project The work will involve resurfacing the street Of the street and construction Cuca-n•, onga.�in addition street Lgh1110119 ay be tastalled anddistricts ag sewer line Improvements may be coordinated with applicable special needed Design of the Project bas been completed. i Stnatlxanticipates rr, 1988 advertising the b ?d In September, 1988, with construction beginning NorthNnrtb Tam — elOpment Due to difficulties eomPlYlag with HU' maud' S schedules. the nods winch been have been allocated to construction e h= of r/Herl t of development offs °elHhborhood reprogrammed W pay rhood. The total cost of the park on Peron Boulevard In the North Town N G Ic pt• t expected to be over the improvements has been oomPleted and construction is anticipated to begin this Fall' SeniorSenlor Shams senior citizens who The inland Mediation Board operates this Program of poras oB m are to want to continue to live independently Th' two purpeces of the re alone counsel seniors mr their living options and assBt those who cannot live alone ue tins roommates among other active seniors. h Citya altoe summer ot 0 tO Eleven (all) program. The Program has been operational meets the City's goal of provldtng a seniors were counseled and one roommate match was made this year. 1008 of these were low /moderate income. This Pcog decent tome in a suitable living environment for all residents. Administer in 1987 -88 the city budgeted aPProximately 20 percent of its entitlement award for yario s allowable administrative costs, below budget. Fair Housing Services. Again this No. 7 b. The city has not Changed its tprogram n s. Objectives objectives for 1957-88 th end would not change is tthem as to su Final Statement of Community O jectives) were: 987-88 Program (as 1. To eliminate and prevent IUMS eahlle blight eeserving the housing stock for health. safety. and Pttb people of low and moderate Income. k f 'z } h• r S L `r I Grantee Performance Peport Pago 9 ,5 .r �q{ f. 1•�I I iL .,y IL To provide Information and affirmative support for the Pair Housing laws of the State and Federal governments, to support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home to a su:teble living environment III. To pnrvide neighborhood parks zed recreation facilities In low and moderate.tneome neighborhoods in order to support rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for MNumuaity activltles will Improve the Bviog environment In the surrounding low and moderate Income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. IV. To ellminlate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street Improvements In areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority In these improvements is being given to areas whose residents are predominantly ealth and safety hazards, moderate h c Improving the hiving environment. , No. 7 c. No comments were received from the public an any part of the CDBG program during the past year. i � � \� a W |■ !§ ! ! ! r � � . � f ƒ\ !k k2 k .m! -A r ]£� \r H P -,�! �� t � � t � �� |■ !a'j !£ I A S n 6 A!� »# !||- } , \| a 0 0� \ | )! \ )• &§ \ 2 0 0 � 0 , .7 It !£ !2 ! } ! ! ! ! I } !} - It it �- - LC � 1 gill | 2 \ \ \ ) || •2| ;; v. § ; § | | § § \� .5b! % ( ■ !$ = J k �)! ■f $ . , c gig % | ■§ � : � - ° � al ' . ! ; | h�| k ■ ! | ; § !! +» | ® | ® = § F MY of 9andl C a utaYOlp 8- 87-MC- 06.0556 apw•nryYMlgM qr AUaa/YN M•{M+w9 ( 339.9 Maa.a.a•ra•rw•r AYa.�a.• .¢� « 0 /� ( Oaarny . Y.•- ••.s.0 GCaO rM r W r Ir..a• Il.wnr IYW } 698.1 ". 2 aCW4W W]IW R•errq ? 40'bV(tWq ( 611.0 rt WYw. n AuaIV a.�a1 ra.wt •ws• Y i O 6.rYb Irtr Y2q M.r•aorf•msrr ( A �nb9. W br 770.4 41aarOVYAq Uqw MCLgO ( 0 � a•�.OrntYYB.Ynq BrNNrYOyw T•a,[agllryr( /rr Naw {Y[1 a.•rq ( 0 • iw.tMr[rar r.emw bcaR•Brrn4 Prr Ntio>MTb aWr Nrlp } O apw•nryYMlgM qr AUaa/YN M•{M+w9 ( 339.9 I Mr.a9m qnu ( 0 4TYY Iaygr cDOa rYr. n.ua.ea.waawa9 ( 411.0 l rar coax r.wY.an.rbUn evy ta•nbYe,q /abenmaW.[..e Ay ( 1109.4 a tow r..Y utYr.e oa.y nq Mlvp /YM ( 339.0 WYw. n AuaIV a.�a1 ra.wt •ws• Y i 260.9 ( w.rs.aq eaa. c •amw/rrsuuean+•Irewr(Mq[w]aw.wo ( 770.4 rq � o..r a.r� c..n r a' ar r.r.n r..• rant W lG...Y•04w 9✓rl A• N,." tinq 4 • raY cow rrq• [l)Ym E'el. W a a9wY ( 339.9 l lHt NYT'q yr R%.w. aMMMObn COYa )B'.1 u•rrw rlb4M (rnrrr bina a•w.0 [ e Mn 4pyrn• Daclw[ le I.oprw yy14 ekle.ya. 9rr Y.a.•war ( 260.9 np.aen• a.n.en+ro w.r Y•aaY• uron• Fa•an 260.9 �[ n.o.. r lanlo0 ar+•4r Won•n••L M a, Yl.a. y [ ( tines NYb w Y+atl bgrnr •.sn• IwrY.• wtu•ea -•nawb 190 0 b a n.vm T.•rly CawgnCwenYUel rT� t•� A -�. lal IO..MN WNIX bYrFTW riCni Wq[ kOpM[.0, 0 CIIC[Yb V•.yr YY•Q• W I••6 +0 a CrwrmnM4pY .aM[(WatbAgvaanwCYNYIra } 0 C.rn.lYr• I.rV.•YaY a•.r.Cab 4v W YrraN N•rN bran ( R IMCM CarIaYM Nyq b fr W IIpO•tY• Nm• MNY r+..as Y • rwcav M w faq w RI.W [M9A OYr•1• , [•aal NOIIMCV•WYbi A�^ V M. Oront";Orwrnanorr Report ta.fYd a.met wok" - V4 u a�rrr r xr.rr ada�orar �� atY of Aahvw Cuaaonga W7- iC- ObO5S6 + 7`"01.1-^ 6 -lD:lj .. IM! alrael E.8woftm b IM fMrneols nd.YNIWw .a.w d Y ibo.be ` F Not AODlttatle r r aw w a..ad /M 6 TrY 1!b iaba b Y r1MM "kmw AS Imwd owr Not AppltuLlb IM M Tow tarlllrt awMN Nm FMa L 1 Me ■ aw r sa ar�.0 •-,c j1 t train: —L==- -1 UIMOW a w Iw Act4om,% CAMACOOrd tia.M lr. .r.• .�... ar .a.w Not AODlttatle r r aw w a..ad /M 6 TrY 1!b iaba b Y r1MM "kmw AS Imwd owr arry IM M Tow tarlllrt awMN Nm FMa L 1 Me ■ e l I-1 a1IT+1 -= n, y■ f 0 . C, 1' n' •l e I E, 8 = e� �a fix o J I tot$ r _,.< °'A �S !C C � O tot$ r _,.< °'A bb| /� � - - • f, �l�• ; ©, �| . � , � ■ ■ , . � §$ k � ! ! k � ■ a O( � a - § t Ck ! | @ p ? ■ '�5- �flz ) )§ § ml �S u W �Y y 2 a 3 's S i cn• I'M v n � � C "a r a a pp gSgx � ao _3L C G Q ~4 OA NM "sitti =s•,Y 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 i7 g N3M it O 0 Y S ml �S u W �Y y 2 a 3 's S i cn• I'M v n � � C ■ / § !| 7§ - | !![ � k| ¥ r� M !l | |� , \\ \i § 51 § : § � | | ! | | I i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ;5 CUCAMONOA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT, 1987 -88 FISCALt YEAR WHEREAS, in 1987 -88, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California conducted a Community Develupment Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the 1987 -88 Community Development Block Grant program has been discharged according to federal requirements and meats both City and federal program objectives; and WHEREAS, the preparation of a Grantee Performance Report evaluating the programs is required By federal regulations; and _ WHEREAS, the Grantee Performance teport is required to be approved by the City Council prior to subeittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Community Development Block Grant Grantee Performance Report for the 1987418 fiscal year is hereby approved. k , s- r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Councii 91 FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY OEVELOPHENT BLOCK GRANT - REPROGRA J'rNG OF $40Q0 IN I. RECOI#MMATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the a ci atTed re-s'dution authorizing reprogramming of $40,DDO in unexpended 1986 -87 and 1987 -88 CDBG funds from the grant administration account and residential rehabilitation program to the Feron Boulevard street improvement project. II. BACKGROUND: The City Council has previously allocated $50,000 in 1986 -87 WIS;inds for the completion of street improvements on Feron Boulevard in the North Town Neighborhood (Exhibit W). The Engineering Division has begun work an the design of the street improvements and determined that the total cost of the project will be approximately $90,000. Unexpended CDBG funds are available for reprogramming from the 1986 -87 program year as follows: $3,540 from the administration account and $35,328 from residential repair and rehabilitation program. An additional $1,132 is available for reprogramming from the 1987 -88 administration account. The reprogramming would not affect the ability of the city to continue to operate a successful residential rehabilitation program. III. ENYIRONHENTAL REVIEW: Environmental review of the project has been completed, an a environmental review record is on file at the Community Development Department. The proposed project is located in a 100 -year flood plain, but the flood hazard will be eliminated by the Area VII storm drain improvements which are nearing completion. Installation of the curb, gutters, and sidewalks may remove some or all of the mature eucalyptus trees lining the street. If any trees are damaged or removed,• they will be replaced in compliance with adopted city policy. Standard city procedures will also be followed to mitigate potential noise and dust impacts of construction on surrounding areas. Staff recommends a finding of 'no significant impact* under the National Environmentsl Quality Act and filing a mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act. It*. PUBLIC REVIEW: Federal regulations require duly noticed public hearing or all reprogramming decisions. Notice was published on August 26, 1988. A public hearing on the item is required. Respectfully submitted. Larry Henderson � a O 2 Senior Planner J y RESOLUTION NO. �'✓ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REPROGRAMMING AVAILABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO MAKE STREET IMPRDVCNENTS TO FERON BOULEVARD BETWEEN ARCHiBALD AND HEIMOSA (THRNER) t A ENUES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves as follows; Section 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates a Community Development Block Grant Program in compliance with the regulations established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; and (11) $40,000 %,f unexpended block grant funding 1s available for reprograming; and (111) $25,328 was previously allocated to the 1986 -87 residential rehabilitation program; $3,540 was previously allocated to the administration of the 1986 -87 CDBG program; and (1v) $1.132 was previously allocated to the administrative of the 1987 -B8 CDBG program; and (v) An environmental assessment has been prepared with a finding of no significant Impact on the envirorment under the National Environmental Policy kt and a mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act; cnd (v1) The City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing to receive public input on the use of these funds on September 7, 1988. Section 2: Therefore, it 1s hereby resolved by the City Council of the City o nc o Cucamonga, California as follows: (1) This Council determines that improvement of the street, although located in the flood plain, 1s the only reasonable alternative and that all potential adverse impacts of the project have been adequately mitigated; and (ii) Directs staff to file a Notice of Determination of Finding of No Significant Impact for the project under the National Environmental Policy Act; and =.o5 ■ 4'I CITY e6 IL'�STAFF REPORT; "` Reprogrraatng °. September 7,1 1988 Page 2 (111) Directs staff to prepare a mitigated Negative Ceclaratton under the California Environmental quality Act; and • a 1v) This Council approves the reprrgrawing of $38,868 in COBG funds-from the 1985 -87 grant year and $1,132 from the 1987 -88 grant year to-the Feron Boulevard Improvements. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. • E e n :j i z L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 7, 1988 WLW To: Mayor, Members of Cttw Council and City Manager Mk--,C From: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Subject: Approval of the Environmental Assessment for the proposed modification of the Routes 16/66 Interchange and approval of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration therefor It is hereby recommended that the City Council accept public input and, if approoriate, adopt the attached Resolution acceptlnq and approving the er..ironmentai assessment for the proposed modification of the Routes 1 ;/66 Interchange end approval of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Mogative Declaration therefor and direct the City Clerk to tile a Nrtice of Determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Ac`. 8AUCai o /AMM.rs1S• In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached documents have been prepared to permit construction of the above - mentioned improvements. Said improvements generally entail the construction of a new ramp within the existing interchange between Intersta a 1S and Foothill Boulevard, traffic signals and widening of existing roadways within the interchange. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be granted a Negative Declaration. Res s itted, RNN Attachment ao7 w } 13M RESOURCES AGENCY TPYL£ 14 a (p. SUB) Itglnr sit Nw to -610�q C ' Appendix 1 .� ENVIRONMENTAL. CHECKLLST FORM (To be completed by Led Agency) L BACKGROUND. L Name of Proponent rr,v OV uarusxt nrAM7rA 1 Address and Phone Number of Proponent: n nacr•:r.rrm tytsn eeysel n ('llfi� oft9_7i1h7 Pmt. S fate of ChecUM Submitted L Agency ReyuLdn Cbeek1W S Naau of lwporal 0 Swic ble n ENVIRONMEN?ALFMPACTS - (Eap)uulbns c(aC'ya' and'rneybe" answers; an n.wi-dd on attvched sheen) L Fink WIO the proposal result im TES UAW ND N Unstable earth condition; or In change In geok* cub- X structures? — — — h Disruptions, displacements, compaction at oeetcove (rag X of the wilt — — n Charge In topopapiry or proud surface relief itatereet a aadlRotfoN ad any mlga geologic a physical feat t M ?Iasi a:atn erosion dsolk ether x a off thenyloenar — — X L Changes in depdUoe or craton of bath cant or changes In illation, depu ion a erosion whleh may naWy It, channel dos rivesor areasa the bed oftheoc a of guy bay. Inlet or Wet X proput geoiopo Eaposkek landslides. d— landdldee, h eartbpualet m udd{des,groundbtlun rJsi lusanb? I Ale. N7R the propad resale be L Substantial sir asabdow or deterioration of ambleat W qty? — — - - 6 The creation of objectionable cdonr — e. Alteration c(aN movement, moisture or tempentun, or any change to Climate, either lonlly a regionally? S Water. Will the proposal result Im L -angel In evrrentr, a the course, a dUWIOo of rater rrwvemeon in ether marine or fresh water? — — X IL Changes In absorption rates. drainage panernsor the rate X and amount a( surface rater rwwh7 — c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood ratera? — X .. ! d Change In the amount ofsurface water in any wstper body? X �p r 7RTS.E ld RMURCPS AGENCY } 15809 ttto@waw skis& 1 »a (p 9249) YES MAYBE ND '. /�,'! a DYderge bko rarfaos waters, a to my altantlan of so. -faa water quality. tndudLq but not Waked to temp@ntu m X k dbaoved oxygen or tutbidR /? — — L ikehtbua( thadkedicamntad0owofgrotndwdeni — — x {� C. age to lbw quality of ground walsim ekber through s'• direct addkka or withdrawals, w through Interception of an r aquiline by mb or @xcevadon? — �- 6 SubxndW ndYd$m In the amount of water othu.Ye X available for public water :0pp6a — — a '. L Expawo of poop(@ or p�periy to water noted hazards 4- i• such as floodi� or tidal waves? — — t Plant LJfa 1111 the propatal resuh Ye (imp in the &wnay of sp@det or number of any spa ' ales of (including tromms, M X b. Reduction of the nrmrbm of nay uniquw. rue or @adaa e ' gered Veda of PiaDW — — o Inbeduelloa of savor spoeW of plasmas roil as uw of In a barrier to the aosaad npkrA&nsat doe" spec W? d. Redwd$m N acreage of any agricultural cW — -S- — :' S Anlaal LJfa WIN the proposal nwk his vy Of cW "b" t (bink Laud LMA" Iaaledhg MPtYa Rslt amend -. she0h(s, bentYe org mism or tneeb)? — — f _ l 6 Rwdudlon of tin sambsn of any GWRCW. ran w endam prod spacW of arrlmals? — a tatroduailan of new tprcla of ae`' --ail kte as area w X resrdt In a banter to the adyatlms or mw+aaeot of aNmala? — d. Dwtive"atMa to odtfag Rah of w"A lebitat? — Y S. Nolan WIN ow propoal result to X a increases In admit{ now le"k? — 6 Pspove of people to severe now lawk' — — 7. LJght aad Clara Will the proposal produce oar Rght or X glare? — — — S Land the. WlgtbtprapwIre inasobftmWakcmtlan of the present or planned Mud use of an area? I. Naural Reaomcea WAN the proposal result to L Increase In the sae of w of ray natural remam? — — Is Substantial depletsm of any wmmewsble natural m X source? — — itl Rhk of Upset Will the proposal Involve a A rbb of an expktim or the nkae of hnurdous sub Aanon (InclucI4 but not Ilmked to o4 pestkidm ehrmkals or rsdbtion) a the event of an accident or upset eondkian? b. PoWbletater fmncewkhmemergeotyrespmuwpknw X an emergency rvalutiort plan? — — aoq c;AIQ 4 ism RESOURCES AGENCY THE 14 (P SUIO) IRNytwaL"tK1NA ,••. To MA= NO 11. Population WIR the popml alter the location. dldrYas• lion density. or growth rate of the human population o(ao am t '\ — — R It Ho�InL. 6t10 tM propwal affect ealnIng hwaoC or dereand x • (or addpbnal M pg? — — IS Tranportatlon /ClncuLWon. WAR the proposal result hu L Ceoentbn a (wbtanlW addRkrW whkvLr mowmegt X ._ — — 6 Effects on existing puking faclikkt at demand for new % ' parkins? — — • e SubdantW Impact up = witting tramporwices "am? — — X S n o N patterr a( circulation or moe o f p� and /or SO s — R w Alteratken to wterbomr. rall or Wr traft? — — x L Increase In traffic bawds to mote whkkt bkyelku or pedestrians? j IL Public Services WAY the proposal haw an effect upon. or e result In a need for new or altered g4vvernmeaW services in any i of the knowing areas x L Fire protedion? b Police protection? ? e Schoo6? _, — y d Pub or other reewtbaal fadWks? — — R C e, Maintenance of public bcNWea, Including toadd L Other gowrnmeaW wrvkw? — — X 11 Ewa. tWR the proposal result lar L Um of aub*w W amount. of fuel at energy? 6 Substantial lnceasa In demand upon aiming aouacss of energy. or require the dewkpnwm of Rew somosa of energy? It L%ibtkL WUI the ; C, result to a and for oarw qv tams or aubdantW aRerstlons to the follming utWelm L Power or natural gas? $ — h Commmdottbm syaema? — % — e. Water? $ d. Sewer or septle tails? — — X e. Storm water draWp? L Solid wage and disposal? 17. Human Health V43 the proposal renA ta L Creation a( beahh hazard or potentW health hazard (eschuding menW�)? X 6 Exposure of people to potential b"kh hasardr? — — — — 1n. Aesthetkt WW tha ptopoW rMh In the choUWks of an sank vlRa or vkw rewh In Ile utatlan of iestbelica olfemhw sits pento A public vkw? —, c;AIQ I "b" �_ '�•� N` I a Lis LE ie'.• RESOURCES ACENCT f 1S�fq: lri.�ww w eta ».dtamel (p S$LIl) YES MA116 Iq M Asemtiai' NSn tEe pmpoml result in"Impel anon for quality or quar!By of aairleg reareuleoel opportoNN�T W 9C. Cult•und Amwo a WIn tho pmporil result In the alserstloa d or the devtruc. lion of a p vhmoncc or hw••rk urheoioflol Ate? X L Mtn thy'peoameal rr I is adv"'phyrlal or &=&tic effects toa Prehistoric or-' tabbagilk ,structumaro*W Je..D,,oes the p vponl Give & poteYW to'eeame a piyn4al X ..tea. wbtA would aced unique sthisk Cultural vahr? d RU tho proper) strict whilst nf{t{om or vend miss waW the pmasmd loved ana? - X IL MM&IW' FM&p of Slpr6oaace. a. Does Hiepopet "ttl%pot' Wle depadn ties4ey ofthatav4oeratat, reduoetMhsbim fa cr W A& to deep b« W low som staining kwh, tbreuta to of d part or an& noel oonmuaMy, reduce ties, Number or reeedd the rang of a ran me endsalltrad pleat or aNseal me'eAmebaw lotportaal azamplas of the seer per" o(Ca lords history or pmleme — L Dose the poled haw the pateetW to esdlkw ebW N 06 to the dbWvOMW Of bat.rera *rAmmmanlal pek? (A $100d4erm hoped a the asviroaoent Is one wkkh oxn is a nktiwly briK de&w ve peeled of than W" keptem Impacts win escluun well ism the Mum) - _ X but Rea Do temuWM lrwtapew.hkhanMdlvWvanyl!m. y -"- •l?(Apto�eetwayhopedce two or man mpesete reeonrcme .hest the 4eped m each m eourca Y nletivey teaaq but wbere the aged of LW total of those Impacts on tho eavheament h dPAcW .) X d Dome the pmlecd haw en mesew eLreds which win CXma alnuatW adverse effects am huxse bolep efthw d$. redly or tadtre dy? IIL DISCUSSION Or ENVMONKWALBVALUAT[ON IV. DETEAAANATION (To be omnpktod by the Lead.ltracy) aj� i t e� J_ If= RESOURCES AGENCY � g U (J. 324.12) Is.aMw tl Na yu -.�Np On t6 basis of shb bit W en6tbm JP 1 Rnd theproposed projex COULD NOT haw O len thaw a NATIVE DECLARATION will bap effect °p the enr(roe. RM khwsh the Proposed ProJect cook haw a atp is set ef&,t on the eov4 reament. there Will not be a aipd3pnt effect In this use browse the ulk*miou meuures described on an attacW thwt haw he" addW to the PrOWL A NECA• TIVE DECLARATION VALL RE PREPARED. O 1 R d � the poppd Pojc MAY hw • s6W RaENVIRO arb_ psnf ad REPORT 1, Date as For, (NOT@Thbl,only a sugpta)f s, pWAk for initial studies.) uencb'.r. (rea to devy ltsskows fpm.t NOTE: Authority cited: Smiam SIdiM MW 210g7. haic Resource, Coda Rafenses Scctbn 2100041174 Pubbe Resource, Coda HISTORY: I. Nev Appendix Ifiled 10i7%e(fMMthirtMthdaq lbewRer(R gm,,,76, Nall). NOM, Order designmed that eompRanp WAb lhY.ppendix Y authorb,d but not msx� datory before 1-1•77. 4 Amendment Ckd !-L"U; efkfwdt a lhbtkth day lhewsRer (Register 71L Nab). S Aroendmeas dSectbnURkdSi6R t&ctlw thirtieth daylheresRer(Register 2% Na Ice). Appendis J NOTICE OP PREPARATION TQ FROM fRerppssfya Agenty) (Lod At#ery) (Address) ( Addrsr) SUBJECT: Notke of PMPUVJ u d• DnR EnvfroeulrnW Iepw. Report w1R bs Ur Land Ageacy and r@ tl sarhmnaeatd to top report farlbe probed WML9adb ,bw.WowadtokaowtbevlaWtdyoarY�Y agercy i scope oannd content d the nvkuR..W infpsalka W&,, Fans,, to Yew Will aced to uu tha FIB b� V connection with the pn)aN, Yew adaocy aPPM%Ml for the projatt.PnPand byaar aleaey when OOq K yew, or atbr In�•I:s ciicl tau sad the probsbfa eaekoneaeatil tf{aeb aru emW sud erlala A copy d the tnkt.l Study O k O is nct..tth hsa Out to the time Bulks m dated by State Is, your r,apaaae ssunt be asst at the asrheA Pleam wad yaw response Poalble data but sat later than 43 days;l raorl r d tbb l o k b need the na fW ,td Psncn b your at the rkraa shown atom Wa will aprory. Project Tnle: oZ Dat� APPlicaeL If soy: Signature Title ToMphone Refennew C140roi4i AdmWrtralfw Cpk Title It. Saetice, IS=7. ISOti q ISM HISTORY: L New Appendix J (Led jLL7 k a9setiw WiletL dsy t eresher (Regi ses 71l Na 0). l' --a C 1 e II I.B.-C) THE PROPOSED RAMPWAY IMPROVEMENTS WILL - - INCORPORATE HARSHEN FILLS TO ACCOMMODATE BOTH ON _ _ - AND OFF HAKES NORTH AND SOUTH OF ROUTE 66 (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD) OCCURRING ADJACBUT TO THE EXISTING r" FREEWAY FACILITY. THE MAJORITY OF THE, - CONSTRUCTION WILL INCORPORATE INS USE OF A EF COMPACTED FILL OVER MOST OF THE ARE% :)F THE ; PROPOSED RAMP FACILITIES. THE FILLS WILL RANGE yt FROM O -FEET AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE LEVEL OF THE EXISTING FREEWAY ESTIMATED AT 20 • FHST. i{ SLOPED EMBANM}4 EXIS ARE PROPOSED SOUTH OF 4 FOOTHILL. NORTH OF POOTHILL RETAINING WALLS O.l r CRIBBING MAY BE CONSIDERED TO LIMIT THE NEED FOR 1._ RIGHT OF WAY_ACQUISITION. �1 II 4.D) T8E LOOPED ON RAMP PROPOSED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL WILL REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF AND USAGE OF LANDS PREVIOUSLY USED IN AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. THE ACTIVE PRODUCTION OF GRAPE PRODUCTION FOR THE AREA IS WAINING WITH LAND VALUES BEING MORE CONDUCIVE TO RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE ACTUAL PROJECT AREA EXHIBITED LIMITED USE COVERING PREDOMINATELY THE RESIDENCE AND WORM BUILDING AREAS OF INS EXISTING FAAM_LAND. II 7.) THE CIRCULAR LOOP RAMP SOUTH OF FOOTHILL WILL REQUIRE SOME SPOT ILLUMINATION TO LIGHT THE TRAVEL WAY. THE CIRCULAR TURNING MOVEMENT ALSO ALLOWS FOR HEADLIGHT GLARE TO RADIATE OUT PROM THE IMMEDIATE RAMP LOCATION. 8.) AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED THE PROPOSED RAMP FACILITIES WILL OCCUPY LANDS WHICH NAYS HERETOFORE BEEN USED FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL USAGE. THH- IMPACT WILL BE A PERIPHERAL EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING FREEWAY FACILITY. 12.) THE PROPOSED FACILITY HAS THE POTENTIAL OF REWDVXNU ONE OR MORE RURAL RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND SEVERAL STORAGE BUILDINGS. _ 13•) THE PROPOSED FACILITIES ARE NOT CONSIDERED TRAFFIC GENERATING YET ARE PROPOSED FOR THE HANDLING OF ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC GENERATED BY DEVELOPMENT OCCURRING OR PROPOSED ADJACENT TO OR IN THE VICINITY OF THIS PROJECT. 16 A.B.) OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES ARE NOTED TO FALL ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL. IT IS UNCERTAIN IF THE PROPOSED WIDENING OF FOOTHILL OR THE NORTH SIDE ON -RAMP WILL IMPACT THESE OVERHEAD POLES. C2 \N1818 - �t CQ I � RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF-=THE 'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Rj&so CWANDOGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THELEWVIRONMMAL ASSESSMENT AND ISSUANCE OF'A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION Al", OF THE 1-15/FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE WHEREAS, the' City Council of the 0.1ty of RAncho Cucamonga has li reviewed all available Input concerning the proposed interchange modification; and WHEREAS, said Improvements require an Environmental Assessient• .Kr-s a d n N NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cunamonga hereby afproves nvf the e r—oiFuWnassessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Interchange Improvements. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of AI DeterninalTon —pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. CQ I � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 TO: Mayor and Meibers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSNEWT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -15 ew.eM�a.e - An appeal of a Plann ng Omm ss on ec s on to deny-Development Review 88 -15, the development of a 1,700 square foot restaurant on 38 acres of land within the Office/Professional District„ located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APR: 208 -811- 58. VARIANCE 87 -06 - DESIGN COOPERATIVE - An appeal of a Planning Co=Ission decision o eny variance 87 -06, a request for reduction in the average landscape and building setback for a 1,700 square foot restaurant on .38 acres of land within the Office/Professi one' District, located at the northwest corner Of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APR: 208 - 811 -58. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appea o e anning Commission's decision to deny Variance 87 -06 and Development Review 88 -15. 11. BACKGROUND: On July 13, 1988, the Planning Commission voted 4 -0 T 9517 aNs'ent) to deny the applicant's requests for approval of a 1,700 square foot restaurant and Variances for building setbacks and average landscaping setbacks. The lot is a legal (under - sized) non - conforming parcel. Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are both special boulevards and require 45- foot average landscape setbacks. The building setback from Archibald is 45 feet. The attached staff report fully describes the project and related Variances. The Planning Commission decision for denial was based on the extreme na%ure of the Variance request, the general intensity of proposed restaurant uses and related parking needs in relation to this small site and architectural design. Staff was directed to prepare Resolutions of Denial which were adopted by the Planning Commission at the July 27, 1988 meeting (see attached). .;� 15 ,i e ■ RE: 7; 1988 Res fully Br r r City P1 finer M s' 8B:CW:ko a Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Letter ot,APpeal Exhibit 'B' - Planning Comaission Staff Report b Exhibits of July 13, 1988 Exhibit 'C' - Planning Omission Minutes of July 13, 1988 Exhibit 'D' - Resolutions of Denial, July 27, 1988 aI(o y - b 7 • 1 • - e , t a! t •' • - a • . • - • • • • 1 • '. IJuly 20, 1988 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attn: Dan Coleman Dear Dan: �i Re: Golden Ox Burgare Review • 88 -15 and 87-06 I On July 13, 1988 the Planning Commision held our review for the proposal of a 1,700 Sq. ft. restuarant on the cornet of Archibald Avenue 6 Arrow Route Road In your city, and rejected its approval based on their opinion of several items which my client a: ,^. I feel arc span for discussion. Since this lot is of a legal non - conforming status for the zone, we feel that the cooperation from everyone involved Is very important to guarantee a successful and pleasant project, not just for the developer, but for the community as wall. We were very discouraged wita the decision not to entertain even a re-design for the proposal and were further confused as to their suggestion of a office building being submitted, since this very idea was attempted nearly two years ago and rejected. It would appear as if the council would approve no reasonalylc plans fo: developmant.',ond leave the property vacant for ;ear& to o.:ma. This obviously is not the way to come to mutual agreement for a quality development. For this reason w• respectfully request a city council hearing for the appeal of the commissions decision on DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -15 and VARIANCE 87 -06. Sincerely,- i �chael, Laaair cc:tl. Tomas, C. Harietta, File 215 North Son Dimos Re. Son amps, Coffomio 91773 (714) 5996406 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and embers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -IS - e eve opmw n o a ,eq Your restaurant on .38 acres of land within the Office/ Professional District, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APN: 206 811 -S8. VARIANCE 87 -D6 - DESIGN COOPERATIVE - A request to allow a re uc on n e requ re s ree side building setbacks and the average landscape setback for a 1,700 square foot restaurant on 38 acres of land within the Office/ Professional Discrfct, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APR: 208 - 811 -58. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Acttcn Requested: Approval of the site plan, elevations, and condi oti ns, reTew of a Variance request and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundin Land Us! and Zonin r - s en a ; cep rofessional South - Industrial; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3) East - Gas Station; Medium Density Residential (8 -14 Nest - Residential; e ial ;LowDen ity Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Des ro ec i nae tionro s: e - c essional North - Office /Professional South - Industrial Park East - Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site is essentially flat, with no significant v—eg—eUMen, at the intersection of two Special Boulevards which require that buildings be setback at 45 feet - a i� FXN�Itf ITEMS N AND U 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1988 Pige 2 and parking at 30 feet. The lot is a 1 al (under - sized), non- conforming parcel. Single Family Residential exists to the west and north. Street improvements have not been completed in that street widening will occur along Archibald Avenue as part of development. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Restaurant 1,700 1 /100 - 17 17 ti II. VARIANCE: The proposed use is consistent with the zoning district in dhfch it is located. However, the parcel is a legal (under - sized), non -conforming parcel and will not allow the proposed site design without variances. The following table illustrates the extent to which the parcel is non - conforming: Existing R_ equired Lot width 90 200 Lot depth 180 175 Lot size 16,200 40,000 The specific variance requests are for a reduction in the average landscape setback along Arrow Route and the building setback along Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. A. Landsca in : Table 17.10.040 -b of the Development Code repo res a 5' average, not less than 35' feet, setback for street side landscaping along Special Boulevards. The applicant has proposed an average 32.51. At no point is it less than 30'. B. Bu_6' it�dtn_ : Table 17.10.040 -b of the Development Code requires a 4 m -Mimum building setback as measured from the face of curb for Special Boulevards. The applicant has proposed a 32' setback on Arrow Route and 35' from Archbald Avenue curb face. However, with regard to the Arrow setback, the Development Code provides that parcels less than 175 in depth need not provide a setback greater than 20% of the depth of the property. The parcel is 90 feet deep which would require only an 18 foot setback versus 32 feet proposed. Therefore, a variance is not romlf,wn Alm A,. o...,.. a lq No 2. i n PLANNING CONMISSiON STAFF REPORT ` Development Review 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1988 Page 3 C. Factors for Variance Consideration: The purpose and intent of a Variance is to provide tiMbility frcm the strict application of development standards when special circumstances pertaining to the property such as size, shape, topography or location deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by the property in the vicinity and in the same district in consistent with the objectives of tee Development ' Code. In reviewing individual cases for Variance, the following criteria must be considered: 1) Special Circumstances (1) Is the property unique with respect to size, shape, topography, or location? (2) Are there e,iceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or proposed use that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone? 2) Preservation of Property Right (Hardship) (1) Can reasonable use be made of the property without this Variance? (2) Without this Variance is the applicant denied privileges enjoyed by owner of other, properties in the same zone? (3) Is the hardship self - imposed or created by the physical constraints of the site? 3) Damage to Others (1) Will the Variance be detrimental to the public• . health, safety, or welfare? (2) Will the granting of this Variance be a special privilege inconsistent with limitations on other properties in the same zone? III. VARIANCE FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Staff determines that the following acs justify the variance request and the requisite findings: A. Special circumstances do exist in that the Property is unique with respect to size. The site is a legal under -sized non- conforming lot. 1 d�0 No3 PLANNING CCNNISsIDN STAFF REPORT Development Review 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1988 Page 4 B. The hardship is not self- imposed but is created by the physical constraints of the site. In addition to the non- conforming tot width extraordinary setbacks are required for Special Boulevards. C. The granting of a Variance would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Y. DESIGN REVIEW COT: ITME: The Committee (Tolstoy, NCNIel. o eman reviewed a project on June 2, 1988 and made the following recommendations: I. The loading zone should incorporate the trash enclosure and should be screened from public view. 2. A provision shcrld be made for future reciprocal vehicular access and parking between the site and the property to the north. 3. Special landscape treatment should be given to the southeast corner of the site. 4. Dense planting of evergreen trees and other appropriate materials should be provided as a buffer at the west and north property lines. S. Parapet detailing, similar to that used elsewhere on the building, should be provided as a 'cap' for stuccoed areas. 6. The accent lighting fixtures on the west elevation should be of a rust color. 7. Special attention should be given to the outdoor patio area. Canopy trees and handscape details should be reviewed' and receive approval of U:e City Planner. YI TECHNICAL REVIEW CC40 MEE: The Committee reviewed the project on ar ma e e following recommendations: 1. An in -lieu fee be paid in contribution to the future undergroundiaq of the existing overhead utilities on Arrow Route. 2. An in -lieu fee be paid in contribution to the future undergrounding of the exiftirg overhead utilities on Archibald Avenue. 0 Nod s r "t f w fi n z PUNNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1988 - Page 5 3. Relocation of the existing signal pole be completed prior to occupancy. 4. Additional dedication will be required along Archibald Avenue in order to accommodate a right turn lane. Other issues involve the potential for the property directly north. Because of limited access policies on Archibald Avenue the coordinated planning of land stretching from Arrow Route north to Steer -n- Stein is essential. Technical and Design Review Committees have reviewed the project and mode recommendations that future development north of the project site be granted access through to Arrow Route. The access could be achieved through the granting of an easement; however, it would require the removal of 3 parking spaces on the Golden Ox site. In order to recuperate those 3 parkin] spaces it would be rewired of any pvopesal north to reciprocate through the granting of an easement for parking purposes. VII. ENVIROI..6WAL ASSESSMENT: Parts I and II of the Initial Study ave een cap e o significant impacts have been found related to the construction of this project. VIII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The building design and site plan, together with e recemmen ed conditions of approval and the associated granting of the Variance will make the pproject in compliance with the Development Code and other Ppplicable City Standards. Ix CORRESPONDENCE: Variance 87 -06 has been advertised as a public ear ng n e Dail Re ort newspaper and all property owners W411, 300' o e su ac area have been notified In addition, public hearing notices have been posted on the subject property. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive all ,u371c testimony ineluding written and oral staff report, make the re quired findings and approve Variance 87 -06. Should the Commission approve Variance 87 -06 it would be appropriate to appro ve Oeveloyaent Review 88 -IS through adoption of the attached Resolution of approval. Should the Commissio:, not be able to make the findings required to approve Variance P7- 06 staff should be directed to work with the applicant to revise the site plan to comply with all of the Code requirements and /or prepare a Resolution of denial to be brought back at the next Planning Commission hearing. 'Xaa NOS F, 1;VW3 No 4, -1 PLANNING REPORT Devel cPment'Revfew)88-15 Design Cooperative July 13,-1998-,; Page 6 ly subm d ARespe ra City PI ner 08:CW:vc Attachments: Letter of Justification Exhibit "A' - Location/Site Utilization Map Exhibit -'B' - Site Plan Exhibit "C' - Elevatfong Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plans Variance Resolutions of Approval Resolution of Approval with Conditions 1;VW3 No 4, -1 a Ras _ _ `Y...F -. �' af��p� .. � � •_ __ 'L)a..sy '%°+. Dad Bl,+idng Design, Coin ng, Engineering and DroQUg ' "- Residentbol . RP,mocW1rxj ` Indtistnol . Cormwool April 18, 1988 Mr. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Coldem Ot Burgers Northwest corner of Archibald Blvd A Art" Rte. City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. Colemnt Iu reviewing this project, we wind like to bring your attention to the required set -backs proposedfor both Archibald Blvd and Arrow Rte of 45 feat from curb face. Both of these streets front the subject property, which is currently recorded as a 90' x 180' lot reapectfull to abova-eentioned streets. Now, by subtracting these setbacks plus the additional 20' required for builings or 101 as required for parking from the north property line and also deducting the 11' dedication for engineering to constrict a right turn lass along the entire Archibald Blvd frontage, ve are loft with a net buildable at" of 25' x 1251. We would like to point out locating a building on thin sit• with those constraints would not be the problem as much as the fact that It would appear impossible to locate any parking for on -tha -site, with or without a building for it to serve. It is for this reason that we feel the requirements of 45' for both streets to be setback severely prejudices the subject property and request a variance for this project. SiacacoIy,, L. Michael Lafify Principal LNLtcal cc: Pile �A D4 NO 7 215 North Son Di=s Re. Son Dimos, Colifiornio 91773 (714) 599-6206 u U -TFl 91 lizi 91 1 ' • ',{/i.�1}�.1'1 ,11 '1,�'', '11 111 �� L4 `i �°-�.i 1•J.•r��\ ��II �.V V �e� Y � mow. VI wvV �1r Ark �i �I r P� .y 1wIi n�IMXI'3 JAtLVi3 s aF bnwa X0 le 41 L S&Mbaa so K)UM aALLVW3,d00* watsiaLTAN It 4 Ile ILI ME- la '�E�IIAI�S�I�III �jB8BBB888BBBBB111 � - ; 1 fif 1 ' _ ce s, 5 i / k r r f_ a .1} aZ' a s� a .t 5 ;5 f r f f L. IRONlENTAL ASSESSMENT AXJ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-29 - tVERSO1. ,The as expan an ex ; ng o ce use n a eas space o , square f within an existing industrial park in the General Industrial Oistrict (Su ea 11), located at the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and 6th Stre - APH 209411 -17. Otto Krout Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Staff was concerned wl potential parking problems when the business park is fully leased. The re, it was recommended that no further conditional uses be permitted with a parking stwfy documenting that there would be no parking problems. Wee- Chairmn Chltle ened the public hearing. Diane Iverson, 3350 . elby, Ontario, C,tifornia, concurred with the recommendation of staff the conditions of approval. She indicated that a parking study is underny ch will address the concerns expressed by staff. There were no further ccoven therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated wA the parking study is submitted by the applicant the Commission should b cutious in its review since the type of tenants currently less g in the p t are sub3e:t to change, therefore the parking situation cculd change rapidly. Yfce- Chairman Chltlea concurred and fu stated this is not atypical industrial project and would not like to see s concept and design destroyed. Notion: Moved by EmArick, seconded by Tols , to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Condition& se Permit 88 -29. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY, CHITIEA, ESLEY NOES: COf1ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL - carried f * *ff OLD BUSINESS The following related items were heard concurrently. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Alm OEVELOpMEUT REVIEV 88 -15 - DESIGN COOPERATIVE within the Office Professional -- istrict, locoted at the northwest corner of A -row Route and Archibald Avenue - APH 208- 811 -58. June 22, 1988] (Continued from W to it 0#10/1 ef Planning Ceemissica Minutes -17- July 13, 1988 �3U I 0. VARIANCE 87-06. DESIGN COOPERATIVE - A request U allow a reduction In setback-for a 1,700 square foot restaurant on .38 acres of land within the Office Profassfcnai District, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald - Avenue - APN 208 - 811 -58. (Cohtinued frus June 22, 1980) Chris Nestman Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. �b Vice - Chairman Chitiea invited,publie comment. Michael Lansing, repro=eeting the cppl•_cant, felt this was a nice project given the constraints of the site and urged approval by the Commission. There were no other comments. onsidered item t r e r e m e l y ovverbuilt-astaproposed. 1 S h e t s t a t e ed d that even thoughdthe project dPpetetd U meet the afnieumm parking standards. she felt parking was inadequate based on a review of other fast food restaurants and pointed out there is no possibility for O"rflov parking an the site. She stated that a fast food restaurant may not be bast use for this. She was also extremely uncomfortable with the architectural design of the project. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed and further stated that a restaurant use in any project Is very parking intensive. He felt the site was too small U accommodate the amount of parking necessary for a restaurant use. He did not consider a restaurant use as a viable project on this site and felt that another use such as an office use should be considered. He could not =nJrort either the variance or the project. Commissioner EmeHck agreed and stated that the building was Just too close to the street. Commissioner Slakesley concurred. Me stated he liken the courtyard approach but not Nat close U Archibald. Motion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Tolstoy, to direct staff to place Resolutions of denial on the Planning Commission agenda consent calendar of July 27. 1988, lotion carried by the following voto: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSMY, BLAKESLEY, VNITiEA COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL Planning Commission Minutes a31 -28- - carried July 13, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -145 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCMIOHGA PLANNING- CCMISSION DENTING VARIANCE NO. 87-06 TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN AVCRAGE LANDSCAPE AND BUILD'NG SETBACKS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Or ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALO AVENUE IN : THE OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT - APN: 208 - 811 -58 A. Recitals. iY (i) Design Cooperative has filed an application for the approval of Variance No. 87 -06 as described In the title of this Resolution. .� Hereinafter to this Resolution, the subject Variance. request is referred to as -* "the application ". (11) On the 27th of July. 1988, the Planning Co®ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a areting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (fit) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have Occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, TMEFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. his Commission hereby specifically finds that all of th facts set forth in •he Pecitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Coamfssion durfng the ebove- refirsnced meeting on July 27. 1988, including written and oral staff reports, th*.s Commission hereby specfficdlly finds is follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Architald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage width of JO feet and lot depth of 180 feet; and (b) The subject property 1s 16,200 square feet in area; (c; The property to the north of the subject site is a ncn- con'arntng single family residence, the property to the south of that site ceaststs of an industrial park, the property to the east 1s a single faintly rasicential tract, and the property to the west 's a gas station; and - (d) The epplicatfon is associated w'th a development proposal fo• a 1,700 square foot restaurant; and (e) the Variance request is for a 20 foot reetiction in t•e required building .etback and a 7 foot reduction In the average landscace setb.ck w Archibald Avenue. a, n �XHi� r i7 � =- •-. - — - ^ - ._ PLANNIMS'CONNI'SSION, RESDL r, UTION NO. de -15a July Z7, 1988 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Comadssioo hereby finds and concludes that although it has been recognized that there are unusual physical w restraints and extraordina development opment standards uaiqua to this property: y(a) That approval of this Variance would be Y inconsistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code; and (b) That there are exceptional _circumstances applicable to the property that do rot ' generally apply to other properties in the same ,t area; and rit (c) That literal interpretation and enforceeent of toe specified regulation would net deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district; and (d) That considering the extent of the request, the granting of this Variance would constitute a s' grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; and (a) That the granting of this Variance would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to proaerties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Caemissfon hereby denies the apps ;cation. S. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of tnis Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1988. TISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.NONGA J a33 I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commlision of the= City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the ;foregoing Resolution was °daly and . x regularly introduced,, passed ;wand adopted by,the•.PIanning Commission 'of -16- City of Rancho Cucamonga, at'a'regular meeting of the Planning CommissG- heid on the 27th day of July, 1988, by the following - vote -to -wit: AYES: MISSIONERS: CHITIEA,'BLAKESLEY ; NOES: C"ISSIONERS: .- HONE T. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK. TOLSTOY ABSTAIN: COMISSIONERS: NCNIEL a34 J� NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING RANCHO CUCA 0NGA CITY COUNCIL The Rancho Cucamonga City Council will be holding public hearings at 7:30 p.m. on September 7, 1988 at the Lions Park Community Building located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, to consider the following described project(s): the development of a 1,700 square foot land within the Offlce/Professional Oistrict, corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue f- VARIANCE 87 -06 - DESIGN COOPERATIVE - An appeal of a Planning Commission decision to deny ar once - , a request for reduction in the average landscape and building setback for a 1,700 square foot restaurant on .38 acres of land within the Office /Professional District, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APN: 209 - 811 -58. Anyone having concerns or questions on any of the above items are welcome to contact the City Planning Division at (714) 9694861 or visit the offices located at 9340 Base Line Pad, Unit 8. Also, anyme objecting to or in favor of the above, any appear in person at the above - described seating or nay submit their concerns in writing to the Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to said meeting. Au cast 2__g 6,_1988 Rancho Cucamonga City Council a a35 ,4 ..° Golden-Ox, Res UUrint y 9409 Cecilia Street' - Downy, CA 9241 +( Y 4° Mobil Oil Corp. P.O. Box 290 Dallas, TX 75221 8 Batty J. Kopp a 973 Grn 973 ation Carnation ; ^' Costa Mesa, CA 92626 s Grand Properties = C/o Dynamic Investments W P.O. Box 4197 Covina, CA 91723 `- 1: Haria D. 8 Martha E. Romero 9649 Calla Yejar Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Sharon K. Ku 9648 Calla Yejor Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A.H. Reiter Devolopment Co. P.O. Box 7250 Newport Beach, CA 92633 Foodmaker, Inc. P.O. Box 783 San Diego, CA 92112 _ FmPire Partners 9333 Base line Road, Ste. 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 a3� ,,,Q� 1' Aff!"TIT W w1ulw HMIN OICISIon 1. _ Q/'�1 do, _ J sell Clark for the City of Reecho Cucamonga do hereby smr tMt•on a9 _ ts88it approximately ,�,� �]j o"clockt P.lf7 . (s,t, /y,�,1. I deolited In the Cucamonga BreniR'3TpR pR1tN,Sta a located at %07 Business Center ON", a letter addressed to and raardtno v n :: is _• . t 1 O� 3 w � O ,-f CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 7, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Hurakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Public Hearing for the purpose of hearing and passing upon objections or protests, If any; which may be raisad by any property owners or other interested persons regarding the Notices of Construction that were posted August 23, 1988 on the properties frontingg 19th Street between Hermosa Avenue and Cartilla Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911. RECONOOATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with the installation of frontage improvements on 19th Street between Hermosa Avenue and Cartilla Avenue, If such improvements have not been installed 60 days after September 7, 1988, to accordance with Chapter 27 of the improvement Act of 1911 and order the formation of an assessment district for APR Nos. 202- 201 -08, 202- 201 -39, 202 - 201 -40, 202- 201-37, 202 - 201 -27, 202- 201 -35, 202 - 201 -36, 202 - 201-43 and 202- 191 -28. BACR6ROU10 /ARM.TSIS: Since 19th Street between Hermosa and Cartilla Avenues is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, the City cannot follow its normal steps of negotiating a fair and equitable exchange of street Improvements for land cost, as noted in the attached memorandum dated July 29, 1988. Caltrans has stated that this could constitute coercion. Therefore, unfortunately, to satisfy Caltrans on this project, even though we are fully funding it, the City must first post the properties involved and conduct a Public Hearing for assessment proceedings for the 1911 Act (Chapter 27). On August 23, 1988, the attached 'Notices to Censtructfan' were posted in front of the properties located at 6729 Hermosa Avenue (APH No. 202 -201- 08), 10213 - 19th Street (APR No. 202- 201 -39), 10223 - 19th Street (APH No. 202- 201 -40), 10235 - 19th Street (APN No. 202- 201 -31), 10287 - 19th Street (APN No. 202 - 201 -27), 10295 - 19th Street (APN No. 202 -201 -35), 1030; - 19th Street (APR No. 202- 201 -36), 10345 - 19th Street (APR No. 202- 201 -43), and 10304 - 19th Street (APR No. 202- 191 -28). These Notices were posted in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and order the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, base pavements, street pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other Incidentals CCSR September 7, 1988 Page 2 IF A therewith. The Property Owners are Instructed that they are given 60 j days from the date of enactment of the 'Order to construct" to construrt said Improvements. �-Aftar,the_60 days shall expire; the City Engineeri acting as the Suporintendentof Streets, will cause-the impro vements to I be constructed and the-property owners will be assessed for all the colts Introduced wlthii-ttN'correspondfng property. frontages., The-costs will be paid from th9'1'brMMtIOn'0f•An assessment district which will' include the above mentfoned:AMMumbers. Upon hearing prote sts or°objecttons, If a Council 70 at -the public hearing Is requestedito sake a ruling' and d I otests rective to staff- regardin; and make 'directive to�'tho City En?fneer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets, -to peed with the said improvements, If"such have not been constructed by November 7, 19$C\and to further orddr. the formation Of an assessment district which will include the listed parcels to pay for said improvements. Re.-pectfull 1 submit tted. RHM: Attachments: Resolution Memorandum dated July 29. 1998 NONE r z 3 a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: July 29, 1988 To: Kaycr, Members of the City Council kanager From: Russell H. Haguire, City En9inee By: Me Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: R/W Acquisitions in State Highways w When it is required to take R!'A to widen an existing stmt, the City usually follows these steps: 1. Conduct neiphbori:cod meeting. 2. City negotiates a fair and equitable exchange of the street improvements for the land cost based on an evaluation of improvement versus land cost. 3. If negotiations fail, the City proceeds with the following: a. Appraisals b. Notices and Hearing for Condemnation c. Posting and Hearing for assessment proceedings in accardance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911. 4. Negotiations continua parallel with Itaa 3 until resolved oy settlement or legal action. However, when acquiring R/M for a State Route, Caltrans has stated that the above practices constitute coercion and that possibly any contact with a property ouoer before a full offer for the property is made could be considered solicitation. Therefore, unfortunately, to satisfy Caltrans on our projects involving State Routes �eeeh though we fully fund them) we plan to do the following: 1. Appraisals 2. Posting and Hearing for assessment proceedings for 1911 Act (Chapter 27). We will use this hearing to explain to the people the 1911 Act and what is happening without violating any Caltrans guidelines. 3 Conduct neighborhood meeting regarding the project details only. a� W. g•✓ - : e:'�' �i<4� a `,`- '•r�1��= ��i�p'i� iL�' .<' 's..,. :a t �;y. ti, ;'y 4�sy j-pC- h P/N AC ISITIOVS-IN'STATE HIGWAYS t� JULY 29.,1928 c PAGE 2 "• f 4. Make.:'diract . offers to Purchase the neediA R/W for •a rat- aewunti Hopefully,• after the Public Hearing and neighborhood ereting;,. -the Prope11Y .owners tnttiabt a .donation of R/N 'for relief of atsessernt. Celtrans would not construe this to be coercion. S. NegotiationsSOntinut in accordance with Item 4 until resolved by settlraent or legal 'action. Until the hearing, for assessment Proceedings for 'the 1911, Act (Chapter 27) a State Route R/W or negotiation procedures 'because discussion of these wttsrs could be construed by Caltrans to be coercion -or solicitation for a donation of R/N. RM:NO:dlw Cc: Jack Lam, Assistant City Manager -a,41 r e, a F+ RESOLUTION NO. 0 6L/7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OSUNCIL OF THE CITY.,OF RANCHO CUCANMGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF s PUBLIC IMPROYEM OS 04 THE PROPERTIES FRONTING 19TH STREET BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AMO CARTILLA AVENUE, IN i ACCORDHNAANCE WIIH,THE CALIMMIA CODES FOR STREETS AVD HIGYS SECTION 5870 THRU 5880 MORE COMIONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEWNT ACT OF 1911 WHEREIS, on August 23, 1988, the City Engineer acting uider the authority of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga had posted at the subject location a Formal Notice to Construct Public Improvements. on of RanchoHCucamoon;a this has date top hearrall - protests or�objectionsffroom0anyy interested parties to the Order to Construct; and upon hearing all objections, resolves in the common interest c` public health, safety and welfare for the City of Rancho Cuamonga that public improvements be made on the properties fronting 19th Street between Hermosa Avenua and Cartilla Avenue. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest requires an 'Order to Construct' street frontage improvements consisting of parking lane pavements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parkway grading, drive approaches and street lights and all incidentals thereto in conformance to the 'Standard Drawings' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1984 edition with supplements through 1987, with all plans and construction work being subject to review and permit by the Engineering Division of the Comounity Development Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All work shall commence within sixty (60) days of the execution of this resolution and if not comenced or provision made therefore to the satisfaction of this City Council, the City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, shall cause such construction to be made, and in pursuance to the statutes of the California Codes for Street and Highways shall proceed with actions to assess the costs theefore as tax lien upon that real property described as: Those lands situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino end described as follows: M No. 202 -201 -08 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of Parcel 1, Parcel Map No. 9986 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, according to the map thereof, on file in the Office of the County of San Bernardino, State of California lying Northerly of a line 44.00 feet Southerly of and parallel with the following described line: a 4a Resolution No. Page 2 Beginning at the centerline of impi 9986, said centert Northerly of the N of Section 35, Ton along said centerl point on curve leaving cente central a of 2 concave Nc -ly I curve through a ce point of tangency Northeast Quarter; feet. intersection of the centerline of Hermosa Avenue and the ,ovements of 19th Street as shown on said Parcel Map No. ne of improvements being a line parallel with and 3.52 feet °rth Line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast quarter iship I North, Ran" 7 Nest, Stn Bernardino Meridian.; thence Ine of improvements, North 89 56'51' East 315.00 feet to a :oncave Southerly, having a radius of 2000.00 feet; thence ;line of improvements, Easterly along said curve through a °24'14', an arc length of 83.91 feet to a point on a curve laving a radius of a 2000.00 feet, thence Easterly along said ntral angle of 2 24'14', an arc length of 83.91 feet to a with said North Line of the Southiest quarter of the thence along said North line North 89 56'51' East 1345.70 containing 11,692 square feet more or less. APR No. 202 - 201 -39 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of section 35, Township I North, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian lying North of a line 44 feet Southerly of and parallel to the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 35 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, of the following described land: The Nest 134 feet of the following described property: Beginning at a point 3956.7 feet North and 693 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35; thence North 388.8 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2450 square feet more or less. APR No. 202- 201 -40 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quartergr of Section line 44 feet 1S Southerly ofeand parallel to theiNorth Meridian line ofitheNorth Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 35 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, of the following described land: a43 Resolution No. Page 3 Beginning at a point 3956.7 feet North and 693 Yeet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35; thence running east 627 feet; thence South 388.8 feet; thence Nest 627 feet; thence North 388.8 feet to the Point of Beginning. Except the East 359.04 feet thereof. Also excepting the Nest 134 feet. Containing 2535 square feet pore or lass. APN No. 202- 201 -37 ti LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of sectin 35. Township 1 North, Range 7 west, San Bernardino Meridian lying North of a line 44 feet Southerly of and parallel to the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 35 in Yu City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, of the following described land: The East 224.04 feet of that part an of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to govern7ent survey, described as follows: Beginning at a point 3956.7 feet North and 693 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35; thence running East 627 feet; thence South 388.8 feet; thence Nest 627 feet; thence North 388.8 feet to the Point of Beginning. Excepting the East US feet thereof. Containing 4433 square feet more or less. APN No. 202 - 201 -27, 20.2- 201 -35 and 202- 201 -36 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian lying Northerly of a line 44.00 feet Southerly of and parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, of the following described land: Resolution No. Page 4 The East 135 feet of that portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 7 IA•st, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to goverment survey, described as follows: Beginning at a point 3956.70 feet North and 693.00 fast East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35; thence running East 627.00 feet; thence South 388.80 feet, thence Nest 627.00 feet; thence North 380.80 feet to the Point of Beginning. Except therefrom any portion of above described property lying within any streets or highways. Containing 3685 square feet more or less. APN No. 202 - 201-43 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian lying North of a line 44 feet Scutherly of and parallel to the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 35 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, of the following described land: The East 75 feet of the Nest 352 feet of the North 600 feet of the Southeast One Quarter of the Northeast One Quarter of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to the Official Plat of said land filed in the District Land Office July 31, 1884. Containing 825 square feet more or less. APN No. 202 - 191 -28 LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Easterly line of Tract 9472 filed in Book 177 Pages 6 -8 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of San Bernardino County; said point lyinn, 29.82 feet Northe-ly of the Southeast corner of said Tract 9472; thence along said East line, North 0013'34" East (record North 0011'13" East) a4s MY, i •�1 \�V Resolution No. ;^ Page 5 J 220.11 feet; thence leaving '"id, East line, South 06 006137• East 90,65 feet; thence South 89 46'46• East 4.00 feet to it point on a line parallel with and 14.00 feet Easterly- od';said East line, of Tract 9472; thence ,along said parallel line. South 0 13'34'_West 91.15 feet to a point on a curve concave Northeasterly having a radius 8114.00 feet; thence Southerly along said,curve through a central angle of.190 161439, Of an arc length of 37.82 feet to a point 44.00 feet lint the j .y of sad Northeast Quaarterlof Northeast Quarter of Section 3�then e along said parallel line North.8.9 °56'51' Est 54.00 feet; thence leavin9 sold South North 0 °OU)"'Nast 16.00 feet; thence North 89 f hen 56'51• East,6.00 feet; thence South 0 03'09' Us% 16.00 feet to said parallel line; ;thence along said parallel line North 89 56151' East 272.92 feet to the East linesof Quarter South the North st Quarter of West half'Of said Section e3S; thence alontgsaid Easttlt South 0 13134' Nest 12.58 feet; thence leaving said East line, South 8040118' West 371.04 feet to the Point of Reginning. Containing 7220 square feet more or less. i r CM OF RANCHO CUCA2l ONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 7, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8y: Chuck Mackey, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Proposed Truck Route Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: It it recommended that the Truck Route Ordinannc�e which limits truck usage to certain City streets by truck' category a& imposes restrictions on other City streets be adopted. 11ACITROOND /ANALYSIS• The City Attorney has reviewed and revised the proposed Truck Route Ordinance. The California Vehicle Code recognizes several categories of trucks and therefore, so does the ordinance. Truck routes are basically limited to arterial streets and streats in the Industrial area. Commercial truck, tractor and trailer combinations and vehicles exceeding three tons may only be operated on truck routes. The Public Safety Commission has reviewed and concurred with the truck ordinance. A signing plan has not yet been developed, but there will be several signs used: standard 'truck route' signs; No trucks or vehicles over 3 tons' signs; 'terminal access route' signs; '38 foot kingpin length truck only' signs; descriptive truck route ordinance signs at the City limits; and perhaps 'industrial District' signs. A detailed signing plan and implementation my take some time to complete. However, certain problem locations can be promptly acted upon, upon passage of this ordinance. This ordinance is a necessary tool in the City's on -going attempt to manage traffic. P bltted, Attachment 0"?4� r,�jgUG- 1'3— ieByMON 11 :3 T�3;M iiRKMAN O gRC2Y4OKI ' P.`O 2'i �aTiy�j- '�•" ORDIb7117QE NO. 6 "AN ORDINANQH OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY- �. OF RANCMO„CUCAHONOA,`CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CHAPTER 30,.56 OF TITLE SO OF THE RANCHO' *r CUQAHONGA"NUNLCIPAL CODE,- TO PROVIDE FOR THE r DESIGNATION OF UNRESTRICTED TRUCK ROUTED, RESTRICTED TRUCE ROUTES, AND DESIGNATION OF TERMINAL ACCESS ROUTED FOR EXTRA- LAROE.TRUCAD. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AD,POLLONS: gection 1: 'Chapter 10.36 of Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby repealed. A new Chapter 10.56 is hereby added to said Code to road, in words and figures, an,. follows: �i ' °&D3iDS8I 10.'36 c= "TRUCK ROUTFS = RESTRICTIONS "Seotionns . "1A.56.010 Unrestricted truck ;eutea. a 1110.56.020 Restriotod truck -routes. 1110.56.070 Terminal access routes for extra largo trucks. "10.56.040 Ponalties. "10.56.050 Civil romodioo available. 1 "10,56.010 Unrestricted Ir"ck routes. "A. Except as hereinafter provided, or as otherwise provided L law, commercial vehicles and vehicle combinations described in Sections 35400 and 35401 of the California Vahicle Code, or their auccessor provisions, and vehicles which exceed a maximum gross weight of three (3) tons, may be operated only on atrecta designated ao "unrestricted truck routes". Unrestricted truck routes in the city includes "1. All streets within the area dofinad ' by the City Industrial Area Specific Plan as the "Industrial District ". "2. Highland Avenue from Haven Avenue to the east City limits. "3. Base Lino Rood from the west City limits to the oast city limits. AU 4 . % 04. Foothill Boulevard from ttio Vast city limits to the east City limits. US. Arrow Route from Cucamonga Crook to the oast city limits.- 1116. Eighth Street from the vest City limits to Vineyard Avenue. 117. Fourth Street from the Weo' City limits to the oast City limits. 118, e':ove Avenue from Bth Street to Foothill Boulevard. 419. Vineyard Avenue from Bth Street to Foothill Boulevard. 010. Archibald Avonua from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard. 011. Havers Avenue from 4th Street to State Route X30. 1112. Hillikea Avenue from 4th Street to State Route 30. T 1113. Day Creek Boulevard from Rochester Avenue to State Route 30. 1114. Etiwanda Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard. 015. East Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to State Route 15. nB. The provisions of thin section may be onforood when and where the Citv Traffic Engineer has provided signing designating unrestrioted truck routes. 11C. Extra -largo trurka, as defined in Section 10.56.030, may operate only on the routes designated in said section. I'D. ra-options. .' Ill. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the ingress and agrees from a designated unrestricted truck route by vehicles and vehicle combinations described herein onto a City street when necoaoary for the purposo of making pickups or dolivories of goods, warce and merchandiso from or to 2 q UC�13 -BB "M O N'�i 1'S ®, MARKMgN a ARC2YN81G2 �P .'0A/e71�, any building or structure located on s city street, or for the purpose of delivering materials to he used in the aotual.•and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or struoturs upon a city street for which a building pormit has pt:oviously barn obtained. ` "2. The provisions of this section shall j; not apply to a passenger bua'undor the jurisdictior, of the public Utilities Coureission or any public entity, or Fa which is awned by a bus company licensed by the City, or to any vehicle owned by a public utility while necessarily'in use in the construction, installation or repair of any public utility, or to any vehicle owned by 7.: the city, or a City contractor, while necessarily in use in the construction, installation or repair of or on City proporty. "'. The provisions of this section shall not apply ny pity licensed refuse hauling vehicles while ppick. . jp refuse, waote or garbage pursuant to such license.. "jo,56.e20 Rantripted J;rUo routes. "A. section 95401(d) of the California Vehicle Code allows any city, upon finding that certain streets cannot safely sustain thn operation of trailers or eomi- trailore having the maximum kingpin to rearmrst axle distance permitted uDder section 75400 of said Code, to restrict the use of ouch atreets by trailers or semi - trailers having a maximum kingpin distance as determined. certaiu city streets have been determined to be abla to safely accommodate a maximum such distance of thirty -eight (98) fear.. Except as otherwise provided by law, trailers and oomi- trailore having a kingpin to roarmost axle distance in excess of thirty-eight (38) feet are prohibited from using the aforodosoribed streets. The streets described in this sootton shall be known as "restricted truck routes.n Restricted truck routes in the City includes "1. 19th Street from the wont City limit to Haven Avenue. 02. Vineyard Avenao from Foothill Boulevard to Carnelian Street. 111. Carnelian Street from Vineyard Avenue to State Route 30. M FlUC- 13 -Ob.' 'C• -'..', "fir. �iy 4ir•:t�'.�, _ a b< ...I /d' ?.,4`i.: MON 1- Sy -a9'y MPRKMAN O,, L.RC2YN9KI' P. O5i O,T 114. Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to State ROat0 30. "B. The provisions of this section may be enforced when -and'where" the City Traffic Engineer has provided signing designating restricted truck routes. "10.54.030 Terminal access ro..ea 14L extra -Sarno L truoka. "A. Except an oihozwise provided by law, truck - tractors and semi - tractors, and truck - traotors, semi- trailers and trailers, which exceed any of the size limitations set forth in Sections 35400 and 35401 of the California Vehicle Code or their, successor provisions, and which are exempted from such limitations pursuant to section 35401.5(x) of said Coda, utay'bo operated only on streets designated as "terminal access'routes ". Such traotor - trailer combinations may bo operated on terminal access routes only for the purpose of accessing, facilities wheru freight is consolidated to be shipped or whore full load consignments may he off - loaded or at which the vehicle combinations are regularly maintained, stored or manufactured. "City streets designated as torminal access routes &rot "1. All streets within tha Industrial District. 02. Foothill Boulevard from the,wast city limits to the cast City limits. "3. riurth Street form the vast City limits to the anet City limits. 114. Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Route. "B. She provisions of this section may be enforced where the city Traffic Enginoor has provided signing designating terminal access routes." "10.56.040 penalties, r' "It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to violate any provioion or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. Any parson, fir., partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Chapter or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be ''semed 4 U4- 13- BB_�MO N,C 1`x+1 :40 HARKMAN O ARCZYNeKr P.06i07 •. guilty of an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable as follows: "A. A fine not exceeding y112 )iyndred DollarR (2100.00) for a first violation; "B. A fine not exceedingg 2514 HnAd rpd Dollars (,4ZQ,Q.00) fora second violation occurring within one (1) yoar; "10.56.050 Civil remodios Available. "A violation of any Qf the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may bo abated by the City through civil process, by moans of restraining zordor, preliminary or permanent injunction, or In any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisance." Section 21 The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any praomptivo legislation, the remaining provisiona, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SOCtion 2: The city Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinanca and shall cause the same to be published within '.fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in M R4Rprt, a newspaper of genaral circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. "C. A fine not oxcoading Fiya ffiindLtd II4119rn (rS5OO.04) for each additional violation occurring within one (1) year. "Each such person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall,be doomed guilty of a separate offonso for each and every day or any portion thereof during x which any violation of any of the provisions of this is Q Chapter committed; continued or permitted by such p person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be doomed punishable therefore as provided in this Chapter. "The provisions of this Chapter shall not be construed as permitting conduct not proscribed heroin and shall not affect the enforceability of any other applicable provision of law. "10.56.050 Civil remodios Available. "A violation of any Qf the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may bo abated by the City through civil process, by moans of restraining zordor, preliminary or permanent injunction, or In any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisance." Section 21 The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any praomptivo legislation, the remaining provisiona, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SOCtion 2: The city Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinanca and shall cause the same to be published within '.fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in M R4Rprt, a newspaper of genaral circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. R K M A N' Q'� A Fi C'2i V L\131\ORDTRUCK\P-C- . I L, a of VASSE6,AN jMpTED this 1986. _day ycr city,Clark*'.of, the City of 1, A. AUTHEMP, inance that the"forogoing'Ord. Rancho Cucamonga; do hereby vortitV of--the City Council of the van introduced a�,a regular,mesting City of Rancho Cunamongaheld, on the 4 day of —estinq 07-a—e-ary- 1986, and was finilly pics6d'&t, & r69-uraru City of R&ncho•Cucamonga hold on the day of Council of the 1988, by thq,follo4lng veto: AYES: COUNCIL NEHBERS: NOESt COUNCIL MEMBERS:- ABSENT: COUNCIL MEKBERSs ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEILBERS: Y ATTZSTs 51:Ej: Clor of Tie--c-EFF-07— Rancho Cucamonga L\131\ORDTRUCK\P-C- . I L, a �Q�, - � -� 1 X20 ��o -Sl9 �� 5.35� f �///^^ F l�� 9�7,�5� 1� (`��;'' G �� v,��" �'- os @ y \� � �`� a r, �.�f_ .r: - . �?�n.b 7!B..�,,,•Fy< ,:RFi +:'re a�" r._ v,° ,7��4t ;: ..yi,•. �':h.' -,. i'":ert ate' ' 2 ;A$ ORDINANCE NO. 3 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING ARTICLE 10.56 OF TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MJN&CIPAL CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR E DESIGNATION OF TRUCK ROUTES, RESTRICTED TRUCK ROUTES, C RCIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USI CERTAIN CITY STREETS, AND DESIGNATION OF TERMINAL ACCES OUTES FOR EXTRA LARGE TRUCKS Section IN the Rancho Cucm }nga Municipal Code is hereby dmended by rescinding title 10.56. Section. 10.56.010 through 10.56.040 inclusive and adding in its place Article 1..SS are consisting of sections to be numbered 10.56.010 th ugh 10.56.040, 1 rr •hich said Article reads as follows: Article 10.56 Truck Mqutes and Restrictions Replaces Chapter - 10.56 'taffit Restrictions on Certain Highways. New Chapter - 10.56 Truck Routes and Restrictions Section 10.56.010 Truck Routes ty streets or portions thereof, that allow the use of any legal vehicles in he State of Californi4 as set forth in Sections 35400 and 35401 of the Stat of California Vehicle Code,_ exceeding a maximum gross weight of three (3) s shall be known as truck routes and are described as follows: 1. All streets within the area defined by the C ty Industrial Area Specific Plan and to be known as the Industrial Distric 1'or the purposes of this chapter. _, 2. Highland Avenue from Haven Avenue to east City . • ! V4� 3. '3ase Line Road from the rest to east City limits. 4. Foothill Boulevard from the nest to east City limits. S. Arrow Route from Cucamonga Creek to the east City limits. 6. Eighth Street from the rest City limits to Vineyard Avenue. T. Fourth Street from the west to east City limits. 8. Grove Avenue from 8th Street to Foothill Boulevard. 9. Vineyard Avenur, from 8th Street to Foothill Boulevard. 10, Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard 11. Haven Avenue from 4th 3treet to State Route 30. 12. Milliken Avenue from 4th Street to State Route 30. 13. Oey Creek Boulevard from Rochester Avenue to State Route 30. 14. Etiwanda Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard 15. East Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to State Route 15. The City Engineer is authorized and directed to provide signing as necessary to indicate the use of truck routes specified 1r, this section. Section 10.56.020 Restricted Truck Routes. Section 35401(d) of the State of California Vehicle Code Allows any city, upon finding that MR go certain streets cannot, in consideration of public safety, sustain the operation of trailers or semi - trailers of the maximm kingpin to rearmost axle distances permitted under Section 35400 of said Vehicle Code, to establish lesser distances. Certain City streets have been found to require a lesser said distance which is found to be a 38 foot distance measured from the kingpin to the rearmost axle. These City streets, to be known as restricted truck routes, are: (1) 19th Street from the west City limit to Haven Avenue. (2) Vineyard Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Carnelian Street. (3) Carnelian Street from Vineyard Avenue to State Route 30. (4) Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to State Route 30. The City Engineer is authorized and directed to provide signing as necessary to indicate the use of restricted truck rcutes. Section 10.56.030 Commercial and certain other vehicles prohibited from using certain City streets. All City streets, except those named in Sections 10.56.010 and 10.56.020, are streets where commercial vehicles and any other vehicle exceeding three (3) tons are prohibited. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the ingress aV egress from a designated truck route of a commercial vehicle to a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering material to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a passenger bus under the ,Jurisdiction of the public utilities commission, or owned by a bus company licensed by the City, or to any vehicle owned by a public utility while necessarily in use in the construction, Installation or repair of any aso public utility, or any vehicle owned by the City, or City contractor, while necessarily in use in the construction, installation or repair of a City utility or street. The City Engineer may install appropriate signs on the streets ` affected by this section where he deems the signing appropriate. a Section 10.56.040 Designated Terminal Access Routes for F.,e: ^a- Large Trucks City streets or portions thereof, that allow the use of -a combination of vehicles (consisting of a truck- tractor and semi- tractor or of a truck - tractor, semi - trailer and trailer) which, exceeds arty of the size limitations set forth in Sections 35400 and 35401 of the California Yehicle { Code and which 1s exempted from such limitations pursuant to Section 35401.5(a) of said Vehicle Code shall be designated as Terminal Access i Routes. these said vehicles shall use terminal access routes for the purpose of access to or from a facility at which freight is consolidated to be shipped or where full load consignments may be off - loaded or at which the vehicle combinations are regularly maintained, stored or manufactured. The City streets designated ae Terminal Access Routes are: 1. All streets within the Industrial District. 2. Foothill Boulevard from the west to east City limits. 3. Fourth Street from the west to east City limits. 4. Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Route. The City Engineer is authorized and directed to provide signing as necessary to indicate the use as terminal access routes of the streets specified in this section for such use. Q51 i mmai r il„ yy, r1fi `S After the''installation of signing pursuant to this section, no person may operate any coabination of vehicles exceeding any of the size limitations set forth in Sections 35400 and 35401 of the California Vehicle Code on any street in the City of Rancho Cucama ,, _ .ter then streets which are designated as Terminal Access Routes pursuant th•s section. 1 s asp sr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 t T0: City Council and City Manager Ve FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Yorks Engineer SUBJECT: Reconsideration of proposed Drive Approach at 8362 Hillside Road, submitted by Cheryl Ramirez (returned from July 6, 1988) RECO�EIMTION: Reconsideration of drive approach located at 8362 Hillside Road as shown on revised plan submitted with application for Construction Permit. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS At the regular City Council meeting of July 6, 1988, Mrs. Ramirez appealed to the City Council staffs decision not to issue a permit for a drive approach at the subject address as shown on the plan submitted with the application at that time. The motion failed 3 to 2. The resulting action was to have Mrs. Ramirez present new plans and for the item to cone back to the City Council for reconsideration. Mrs. Ramirez and her architect after working with staff has prepared a revised plan for Council reconsideration (see attached). Engineering and Planning staff have reviewed the final revised plan and finds it to address some of the concerns that were brought up at the Council meeting of July 6, 1988. Although, staffs original positions remains unchanged, the revised plan does appear to meet all the necessary criteria as well as can be expected with one exception: The revised plan does not address the removal of the existing drive approach and driveway. However, tha above can be accomplished through the permit issuance process. Therefore, if City Council approves the proposed drive approach ocatioa, staff recommends that the approval be contingent on the following conditions necessary to be consistent with the current Development Code: o Construction Permit for proposed drive approach will necessitate the removal of the existing drive approach and related work. o Building Permit for garage conversion will necessitate the removal of the existing P.C.C. driveway in addition to any other Building Permit requirements. R,sp 11 s bmitted, / n Attachment �� i r� Y i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 6, 1988 TOs City Council and City Manager PEON: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor SUBJECr: THE INCREASED MEND FOR SPORTS FACILITIES • u As the City is increasing in sire and population, the demand for additional sports fields is becoming an irrepressible reality. As part of the update of the Public Facilities Element of the City's Ceneral Plan being recomcended by the Park and Recreation Commission for approval, the Commission is also requesting that the Comunity Services Staff review the "floating designation locatives" specified and research the general areas for potential park sites. In particular, the Park and Recreation Commission is interested in reviewing the Industrial Specific Area for a park site which could house a sports complex, thus partially relieving the increased demand for sporto facilities while not adversely impacting n residential community with noise and glare. I feel this concept deserves the support of the City Council and that now is the time to act due to the rising land costs and .lepletion of available property. Further, I feel that direction should be given to staff to look for land in the following categories: 1. Land potentially available on a long -term lease (i.e., surplus land owned by one of the largo industrial companies). 2. Surplus right- of-way (i.e., land owned by the Flood Control District, railroad, or other public agencies). 3. Any other vacant parcels currently available. Perhaps if we act nom, we can acquire land and continue to provide quality sports programs for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. �r 9. g c. Sports 'facilities , September 6, -1988 Page Two In addition, it is proposed that a specia4 task force of City staff members, - representatives of each 6ports league and school district representatives be =w formed to study long -range needs for sports fields in-our community. It is '. anticipated that the task force report be submitted to the City Council no later than January of 1989. r with the permission of the City Councils I would like to serve as the City Council reprasentativc on the task force, along with another council member and two representatives of the Park and Recreation Commission. uls: j1a 0101.11188 -620 r� a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August '7, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEYARD I. REC@t¢NDATIOA: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends Rancho CucamongaCou a Mlandaark note The Thomas House, 7980 Vineyard, II. BACKGROUND; This site was brought to the Commission's attention in connec on with a proposed office building (DR 88 -11), Its status on the list of designated and potential landmarks !s PLL/PSL /PNL, Potential Local Landmark, Potential State Landmark, and Potential National La:d ► ark. The reason for its significance is its association wf.n the Thomas Vineyards Ninety. It was built in 1926 by H.H. Thomas and sold to L.R. Thomas who owned it until 1941; it then was transferred to William L. Thomas, It is a simple Craftsman - influenced bungalow. When this house was first being considered, there appeared to be a good within possibility that Winery Plazadicogmplexl across moved street slit appears, however, that the cost of rebuilding the rather high foundation, rewiring and making other changes for commercial use is too high to mike moving feasible, according to Rudy Strofnk, Protect Manager for the Thomas Winery Plaza development. The owner, Edward R. Combs, is opposed to designation and to anything that would delay or add costs to his office project. The Commission did not expect that the building would be retained on site; however, the Commission did want to encourage its preservation by encouraging it to be moved. III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: The Historic Preservation om r , Ton '10 - , a sen , recommend designation of tho Thomas House as a landmark. They also included recommended Conditions of Approval In the hopes of encouraging the relocation Of the house: 5 4 'CI7Y_,,A4'C`IL,�STAFF,REP0- A August M 1988 - 17 Ulu ''N Page 2 Th de va Ot l Otr Choonutsre i bbUe t e'mtvwdr. J he movet-aabn • e a Oucat eOqual antd o tthe Cos t Of demolition, or, 2. It the structure cannot be moved, that a demolition permit not be issued until building ernits are ready to be issued and a letter received guaranteeing that financing Gr In addition, the house 'should u has been Secured. 5 Y, documented With measurements, photographs, and further research. The r*&$On for the second recommendation is the experience with the Klusmwn House that was demolished' and no project built-., C 1 ornia vi art e must, e mi I t iTahteesd e c n I I ns a reasonable In that the, demolition' of a historically significant a st c is considered in.envfriw"t&l impact under u ss nvtrc * &I meTnal t QRepot ActPretad and ba statement 0 overriding co nsiderat ons adopted. Therefore, these 'two n could be use d as ,t19 measures fora N dgative D Declaration or the office project. pact Iy ad Bu pact t 89:AB:mlg Attachments: Historic Preservatf n Commission Staff Reports Site Plans Resolution i k a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlone Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE 7980 VINEYARD, THE THOMAS HOUSE, A HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN: 207 - 102 -09 1 ACTION REQUESTED: That the Historic Preservation Commission liana FTHe TFa-as House a Historic Landmark. II. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The site is located near the southwest corner of San Te-r-n-a-rdTho Road and Vineyard; it is north of the Thomas Brothers Winery. D. Site Land Use - Zoning_ - General Plan Designation: The site is a single F-71— mily a� usa. "Iis zon ng is determined by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. It is zoned CC, Community Commercial (includes a wide variety of uses including drug store s, supermarkets, and commercial recreation uses for neighborhood /district level commercial goods and services). It has a Commercial General Plan designation. The site is part of the Foothill - Vineyard Activity Center, in Subarea II. C. Surrounding Land Uses - Zoning - General Plan Designation: North - Single family residential; Zoned MR, Medium Density Residential (8.14 units per acre) in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Designated M, tedium Density Residential (8 -14 units per acre) in the Land Use Plan of the General Plan. South - Large, mostly vacant lot with a residence at the southern edge; Zoned CC, Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan designation is Commercial. East - Across Vineyard the land is currently vacant, but the Thomas Brothers Winery mixed use commercial project has been approved. The land is zoned CC, Community Commercial, Footht i Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan designation is Commercial. ash ( v v r w THE THO June 2, Page 2 West - Multi- family apartment buildings; Zoned CC, Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. ' General Plan designation is Commercial. D. Descri lion: The house is a simple and plain Craftsmen - ratterntails� ,naafrontifaciny horizontal roof,band futlilenge osedt i porch, a river rock foundation and rock porch piers. Square Posts support the porch roof. There are wood frame sash windows and cornerboards. III. ANALYSIS• A. Background - Current: This house is on the list of potential identified s s Pan scheduled for a hearing in 1990. It is identified as being of potential state and national interest. It has come to our attention because of a proposed office development which would probably lead to its reanval. B. Background - Historic: The house was built by N.H. Thomas in 1926 army en so L.R. Thomas, according to the State Historic Resources Inventory form. L.R. Thomas owned it until 1941 when it was transferred to Marie J. Thomas who held it from 1941 to 1942 when it was transferred to William L. Thomas. It is one of several struct,mres around the Thomas Winery built and used by the Thomas family. C. St nifiance: This house has some signifiance because it has no men altered and is an example of a simple Craftsman influenced bungalow. It gains most of its signifiance, however, from the fact that it is associated with one of the builltt historical sites in members Ofethe family asotheyWWilt,upntheir vineyards and their winery businass. 0. CiU Policies: The City's oo,eral policy to preserve sites of historic n erest is applicable to this property. It is shown on the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan map but the Plan does not mention the historic significance of this builJing. E. Issues• There is a question about whether an office complex cow— incorporate a bungalow into its plan. There is also a question about whether future street widening would encroach upon the structure which is already close to the right -of -way. �5 fHOMILS HWSE�' •' .:v;v. '3 1988,' If this;strueture is determined and is.recognized, as_ either a La der tte'Califor such a: strue act and miticat <y r have historic significance Park or a point of Historic a Environmental Quallty,Aet, re would be an adverse ns_would have to "bey proposed ■pact, (or a 'Statement of be ultimately issued which spells out exactly why the adverse impacts cannot be'mitfgated and states the reasons that the project should go forward despite the adverse impacts.) Mitigations could take the form of adaptive reuse or moving. F. Environmental Assessment: Designation of a Historic Landmark Is exempt from requ rements (Article 19, Section 15308). IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The structure meets several criteria of the Historic reserva on Commission Ordinance. A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark 1s particularly representative of an historical style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark vas connected with an important family. 4. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. 8. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, commeunity and city. (Ordinance 70 S9, 1979). IY CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily epor . a as spoken to the owner, Mr. Ed Combs. a (OD og�' NISTORICTALSERVATICK CWAISSION THE THOKASMOUSE7;*,(t June 2;' 1968 i, �' Y 41 Page-4 j Y. ;QGT?n-rATIOW,' Staff recommends that the Historic preTerv&ijon n rtcOMW.6d to the City Council that the Thomas House -be designated a Historic Landmark. Respectfully submitted; OJ. .Henderson — Senior Planner Senior Plawer LH:AB:mg Attachments: Resolutions Site Lneation p(tol 'a, KS ANf gadpaAT,ON HISTORIC RE HA 85 NAER Su No 1130 -. 57 _ SOURCES INVENTORY uTM' A--11-1.4j- �OCIswt No 8 Z�.1T`� —'NR Sutut IDENTIFICATION I• Common nime; Them s H D —�_ 7• wrttone Mm &; Th m H �• strettorrural add",: 7980 Vilne'leard, Avenue C;%�ancho Cucamonfa 0, Of,", numEtr: IIp 91130 0207 - 102 -09 ��CPUnry Sa— r_rirdlno C�- `+• Prtunt Owner• William W, Nix C:ry Ontario Adwtq: 578 W, A,msi ZIP 91762 a Soua re 6. Pr &ant use: r own&Mfp p: Pupil, s idence • -wn.au g DESCRIPTION Orlp(nal nee: resid — 7a. Arrnl[ ence &cn,rtllry, Craftsman Bungalow 7e. BryflY d&fcrree N& pD1&niphYLG /aPPlyncl of [tie pt& w I orlprnil c,'4"jPn: wttun antl tlacnlie anY milOr pGU[IOn1 from its A sin9ingSiofits Rafters narrow ex Posed is wood clR f is front gabie, With Wood in grovoin Rafters are ex construction. lowed Panels sash Front door is multi hung windows located anoeftherWindows are lower structure. With rock base integrated proch is with an u panel Ofsglass and s tractor p peer the ceiling and a wood balustrade with along the front concrete Steps an 9 rectangular wood pillars of the is loco: p extending straight out. Pattern e�tendfng to is IOcered to the rear of the structure with Front porch is Of wood witn Y alon9 foundation. th stied t S wash rock A Small structure, with side A separate YPe roof There i extension standard gable roof, wood garage is located to the rear me mature garage door clapbo„rd siding, double hurl of the 9 windows and ac0 2, a. ConRlucuon chit: esvmated Factual 1926 9 ArcnrtM unknown l0. Budder Thomas I1. Approx. property Ili& (ir. feet) Fronutn I2� D�ptn +Fn or approve. iVNp & -- Ia. Danbl of endoted Photoqupe(II olx- d Y M rondillon: E.cdlant _Good _ Fair % CnInprated _ Ao loop,, in ,shun, d u. alterations: None apparent 1S Sunaurtdtrge: ICn,cic man dean am if necntary OPtn land _ Scattered buildings X Oanuty built-up Residential %IndumW _Commercial Other: I& Threats to tim: None knowm—Pr(rne denlopmnt % 2443Lq_ Vandalism Public Works pro(nt _ other: It Nthectructure: On its orlpfnal dtei x Moved?_ Unknown? i 16 RNaud fsaturn: NIA SIGNIFICANCE t& Bneay now historical nd/w rNhacbsral Importance (induce darn, nnu, and arum astods"d with the dtW This is one of several structures constructed around the Thomas Winery that were built and used by members of the Thomas family and by some of the workers at the Uinery. This particular structure was built in 1926 by H, H. Thomas, and was then sold to L R. Thomas who owned the structure from 1926 until 1941. It was transfered to Marie J. Thomas from 1941 to 1942, and then was transfered to William L. Thomas. 20. Main theme of sue historic resource: (If more than one it chocked. rurnbr In older of Importewa.l Arddtet ire An$ as L,ieun Economic/industrial -LE:plondco/Sentenem GOVernment Military R,Iipton Soda) /Edugtirn 21. Sources (Ust books, documrtts, Rrny%personal lAwMen, and their dates). "A Field Guide to American Houses ' Virginia & Lee McAlester; San Bernardino County Assessor Records; personal inter- view with Ada Cooper, November 1967 22. Oatr fomn Prepand v ben 1987 ev (nama) Lynn ern Orpmiaauan Add,m :_ City ?1P _ -- Phone: socauottas "sun maP (d,ne And label site and surrounding Rneu, roods, and prom)nnt tandmVktl; NORTH Q E. g4 \RAW! fMaS( _ "'_WnAPnwa P' % f:8pycr rrYwsdi Q^ twm." FooRn1L a 3 1 e (03 A _ City of Rancho'Cucamongs ' Application for RISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION SISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION -_L _Historic Landmark Historic Point of Interest IDENTIFICATION I. Common Names Thomas House 7. Historic Name, if known, Thomas House 3. Street or Rural Address,_ 7980 Vineyard Avenue i City, Rancho Cucamonga Zip, 91730 County ,.San Bernardino Assessor'a Parcel No. 201- 102.09 Zones pat. Legal Descrlptiont See File Plan 4. Present Owner, if koowns Fd C—�. Address: 435 N- Contra, City, Upland Zips 91786 Ownership is, public privstT- S. Present Uue, Residence Original Use: Residence Other past uses DESCRIPTION 8. Briefly describe the present h sical aarancl of the site or structure and describe aa)r,mm or s terst onifrom its orlMioal conditions See State torn - A very stmt h , - length recessed porch, river rock foundation and porch piers. anA clapbpard siding. T. Location sketch map (draw a label site and surrounding streats, roads, and prominent landmarks): See State nventory Form a�- _8. Approximate property size: Lot Size (in feet) Frontage 12n Depth. 160 or approx. acreage___ 9. Conditions (check one) a. Encelleat— b. Good o. Fair % d. Deteriorated_ e. No longer in existence_ 10. Is the features a. Altered?_ IS. unaltered? % 11. Surroundings: ( checa more that one if necessary) .. n.n ie"a -j 21. Win these of the historic resources (stock only one)t a. Architecture b. Arts g LelsuTs a. Economic /Industrial f d. Gneernsent e. Exploration /9ettlewnt_+ t. Military S. Religion b. 4ocial /kducation 22. Sources: List books, doeusianta. aureoyN. personal Iatereieas. and :hole defeat 22. Dab form Prepared Nay, 1988 By fname)t Arlene Banks Addrolst Cityt Zlpt__ Phnoe: Orsanitattant City of Rancho CYCaaOnea a (4:1s - `_ . iii: �•' ` ' P � .a;. =J.>; t: i 12. Threat' to Shots L�(, -r = A. Naee Iwow_ b. Priests dorslopmon _-2 _ a ygolAt z �'a3 d. pubiio Works Proledt_ a. 7sadalian t. Other__ 1?1 ^r "' 6t 12. _ Data of enclosed photograph(s) 1987 a lAt(1 The fo11Oe1A( (3temo 14 -19) are for structures only. i\ le. Primary exterior building tutorials A. 9teou- .} d. 9tucdc_ d. Nobs_ o. Wood I f. Other M 19. Is the Sbactures a. On Its original sitat x b. Moved-__ c. Oa%noent Y JR. Year Of Initial COAAt"fttiOn: 1926 This Dote 1st A. Tactual i b. getlsatsd 17. 1"blteot (if %noun):_ i F. 18. Bnl:dcr (if kacna)s H.N. IDaaks f 19. Related features: a. Barg b. Carriage bona „_ � rj• O. ^uthonae d. Shad( s) e. Toms I 0drdon(t1 71 f. Windmill S• Baterto+aT /tankho^ase ;t y h. Other. I. Bose h. .i H SIC4171CANCE F 20. Briefly state historical and /or arcbitoetural 1mPertdnce (Include data, Went(, and persona assoOla qd uttb the site ehea known Ys i 6uilt by and for the Thosas fatly of (honks We ra. stet State Icrentary Por. 21. Win these of the historic resources (stock only one)t a. Architecture b. Arts g LelsuTs a. Economic /Industrial f d. Gneernsent e. Exploration /9ettlewnt_+ t. Military S. Religion b. 4ocial /kducation 22. Sources: List books, doeusianta. aureoyN. personal Iatereieas. and :hole defeat 22. Dab form Prepared Nay, 1988 By fname)t Arlene Banks Addrolst Cityt Zlpt__ Phnoe: Orsanitattant City of Rancho CYCaaOnea a (4:1s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: AA PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEYARD I. BACXGROUND: This item was continued at the June 2, 1988 Historic ooportua n ity t Comission thetirelation hip of the ohou e n tod the proposed Site Plan and to see how the wideninq of Vineyard Avenue would affect the house. Attached is a ropy of the existing site plan, elevations, grading Plan, lanulccape plan, and the proposed site plan. The existing house and ge;aga would J.ave to Le rawaved to execute the plan as shown. Ikcord%.- to Engineering staff, widening of Vineyard Avenue would leave an aaylr, parkway in front. of the house. The proposed office structure is evaa slightly closer to Vineyard. II. UPDATE: The Thomas Winery Plaza across the street from this house iinclluudesaaioadaptiverreu a ofi�exT tiny buildings as welltasmnew construction. The uroJort manager, Rudy Strcink, is considering a number of question; about the cost of moving, the feasibility of renting the space, picking spaces, and other considerations before he can recommend such a move. The owner of the house, Ed Combs, is opposed to anything that could delay building his protect. III. RECOiMIENDATION: Staff still recommends that the Historic reserve ion amnisslon recommend designation of the Thomas House as a landmark because of its association with the Thomas family as explained in the June 2, 1988 staff report. Furthermore, staff recoinends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend to the Planning Ccanission that they condition their approval of the design of the proposed office buildings with one of the following: 1. That the house, and if possible the garage, be moved to a suitable location off the pro perty, such move to be partially funded by the developer (at least S high end cost of demolition). .:>—(.O HPC STAF HISTORIC July 7, Page 2 - THOMAS HOUSE 2. If after- a good faith effc which to move. the structur demolition cannot be issues for the project are ready t is recofved by the City p financing for the project Thous House must be photographs, drawings, and professional historic pre; create au complete a reca building.' Respectfully submitted, there is no place to S). that a permit for until building permits be issued and a lattor Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:te Attachments: Site Utilization Hap Building Elevations and Section Conceptual Grading Plan Conceptual Landscape Plan Site and First Floor Plan er, guaranteeing that been secured. The Y documented with Ither research by a ition codsultant to as possible of the r s ■ a; I 5 i_ Y�YIY �7 m nwe .d �1 011,10 p �V J M / GONE OFFICE BUILDIM Rosa rAmmo m CAUMM 417 MG Cmm AVC. WLM CL a � n n n �I E 1 1 t Pull, . � ) I r� )•W)AI 0111 L i f� s tl tl� 11 COMBS OFFICE BUILDING LLSM CrUmmom c) Wawa 40710. M nY In. WUAL CL FT i f� s tl tl� 11 COMBS OFFICE BUILDING LLSM CrUmmom c) Wawa 40710. M nY In. WUAL CL 3, 4$3 m CmMU P"-Wuj& Cy fi I� u[D.M enoaau VD' .J W M11114A/p », CITY IF RA:. C O Ci;CA,*vKXNCA PLANNING DIVISION NORTH ITEM, TM.Es Thomas iAous_ EXHIBIT- SCALE, s`. x Y Acting Chairman Banks stated that the idea of the Etiwanda Historical Society, but it is re maybe they could design the new barn as a rep barn. She stated that she was concerned over Water District to move the barn. Arlene Banks stated that it was her understan to decide if the kliwanda Historical Society arrangements. Larry Henderson stated that the Water Di ric there was a fire. the pSrn was presented to b She stated that se the siding from the e limit given by the that the 30 to 60 days was interested, not to make the is concerned about liability if Commissioner Arner moved to recaenxn designation of 9370 Etiwanda Avenue, the Etiwanda Grape Products Co., ss a P nt of Historic Interest to the City Council for approval. Cow stone Haskvitz seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following vote AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, HAS?(M, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMISSIGNER : BILLINGS, SCNMIDT -- carried Arlene Banks question if the Commission agreed with staff as to documentation of the uildinq. The Commission 1 1!! 1 4 E A PROPOSAL TD DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE. 7980 VINEYARD. A HISTORIC LMLw un rUlul ur n"iuKiu 3wItwGJI - AYw: 4U/- lUZ -W. Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Acting Chairman Banks questioned if the City Council Resolution would be able to Include the two reco=endations to the planning Coomission. She stated that she wanted the City Council to be aware that the Historic Preservation Commission is aware of owner opposition and is taking mitigating measures. Larry Henderson stated that the City Council would receive ail copies of the previous staff reports and the Historic Preservation Commission's recommendation to Vie Planning Commission. Arlene Banks stated that this i +em would first go before the Planning Commission. HPC MINUTES Md -5- JULY 7, 2988 J �ji f, K A n F r 1,• Acting Chairman Banks re- opened the public hearing. Hearing noone, Acting Chairman Banks closed the public hearing. Commissioner Cooper moved to recommend designation of 7980 Vineyard, the Thomas House, as a Historic Landmark to the and City Ccuncil including staff's two additional recommendations to the Planning Coaaission. Commissioner Starm seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM, ARNER, SAWS, HWVIZ HOES: ABSENT: F. A PROPO! COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, SCHMIDT Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Acting Chairman Banks opened the public ha John Liao, owner of the pro pperty, stated initial review. He stated he 1s still i he worked with the architect to incorp at stated ne will suffer a big toss with esi! will be compensation for his ices. Victor Palos, architect with Inlan Design that it was unfortunate his clfen was not before he purchased the land and submitted stated the density cannot be ma imfzed wit He stated that a better design could be doi will become an &.onomic bards ip trying to existing house. - tarried hey have presented the plan for Won to the designation, but house into the design. He on. He questioned if there architect for this project, stated aware of the possible designation the first site plan for review. He the house left on the property. e without the house. He stated it fncorporrte detailings from the Acting Chairman Bank/units d the public hearing. Larry Henderson stat in response to Mr. L1ao's question, the City has no mechanism for fincompensation to the develcper. Brad Buller, City Plstated that the majority of developments Witt a maximum of 14 dwelli per acre usually get about 10 -11 dwelling units per acre, which 1s as % maximum de•rsity. Acting fhairman At is stated she would iike to see the four units in front of the house be mLve4'for better visibility. HPC MINUTES r75� -6- JULY 7, 2988 era�� ■ol !� Y ,RESOLUTION NO. 8B -516 �1 A RESOLUTION OP THE CIT4 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAFONGA. CAL17FOLNM APPRO7IS1 DESIGNATION OF THE THOMAS ROUSE LOCATED AT 7980 VINEYARD AS A L&MMAR& +r WHEREAS. the Historic Preservation Commission has hold a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark Designation and issued Resolution 11o. 88 -13 recommauding to this City Council that said Landmark Designation be approved. NheREAS, the City Cwnuil has received and reviewed all input from the Historic Pranervation Commission regarding said Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, all .legal prerequisites to the adoption of thin Resolution have occurred. WSJ. THEREFOR?, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby specifically find, determine, and resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel Number 207- 10: -09. SECTION 2: Ths proposed landmark roots the following criteria r established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Coda: A. Hintorital and cultural Signi£iceeces 1. The proposed landmark is particularly repceaentative of an historical style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building whirb was once common but is new rare. 3. The proposed landmark was connected with an important family. _ 4. The proposed landmark is connected with a busimaea or use which was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: The proposed landmark in its location represents an establish and familiar visual feature oI the neighborhood, community and city. (Ordinance 70 W. 1979) I seat Pip 2 CECTI ON 3:- Devignation of a landmark is "mpt frm CEQA (Article 19. Section 13-30-8T—. I I SEMON 41 Based an thu substantial evidence reesived and, rovieved by this Council and based on the findings set forth above. NOW. THEMPOM the City,CouncLl of the City of Rancho Cucsaonga does hereby resolve and approve the designation of The Thomas House an a landmark. ty CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA arq MEMORANDUM r $ Z DATE: September 7, 1988 > 1977 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ANNEYATION 88 -04 - ANMANSON DEVELOPMENTS INC. - A request o appprove a statement or n en on o annex a 54 acre pportion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street - APN: 225 - 082 -01. I. RECOMMENDATION: St• f recommends approval of the attached so a on -Intent to An which authorizes staff to submit an application for annexation and a Plan of Services to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFC). II. BACKGROUND: The attached Resolution of Intent to Annex and aaiUcTied exhibits are for approximately 54 acres of vacant land. This property is located directly north of the Melche,., property which will be considered by the LAFC on September 21, 1988 and is scheduled for City Council confirmition on October 19, 1988. The applicant, Ahmanson De%- iopments, Inc., has also submitted appplications for Development District Amendment (Pre-zone) fcr the subject property. The site is located within the Nest Valley Foothills Community Plan under the County's jurisdiction. The site is currently designated under the County's General Plan for residential land use up to 2 dwelling units per acre, plus up to 255 density bonus. Under the City's General Plar., the site is designated Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). The pre -zone application is for Low Density Residential (2 -4 d.rclling ,nits per acre) in conformance with the City's General Plan desigration. The pre -zone application and development agreement are scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing on October 19, 1988 and for a City Council hearing on November 1.6, 1988. In addition, an annexation agreement will be presented to the City Council with these items. CITt kT1-'tir)WW5 6V -V -Nl! R•- ANWEXATIOM,0&441,--t`, September page 2 Further, the applicant has met with staff prior to submittal, of a Master Planned Development of 131 units on,,52.5, net acres of- Aand X fors densfty-yield.bf 2.5 dwelling.units'per acre.— I— &�pplicint to - the- City and prefers tO annex' proceed through the, Cit S Development Review process, -,and therefore, has not ,'sbbmitted any Glans to the Cvjnty.,, It should be noted that staff has recommended project not exceed 2;25 dwelling units per acre. For a total, of 118 units. 111. COUCLUSION: Ado the attached Resolution of ' --rs—th ptl on of to Fne Wx a first step leading to annexation and development of the suoject property. Respec -501Y subaitt City P1 ri er Flam er 88:HB:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A' Vicinity map Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex with Attachments t 1111111111 C'lir Limits •e�� UnInCOtPOrSted Area Within Clty •l1hOt• of Influence vOEt i'H CITY OF RAINCHO CL,'CAM(A\GA PLANNING DIVISION i TrrLE'- VIG1N1T A M-_ EXHIB7P ° ALE, �-- N ■as EXHIBIT'A' Justification for Proposal and Preeminary Environmental Description Form TO: Local Agency Formation Cammisslon 175 West Fifth Street, Second Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 -0490 For LAFCO Uso nly- INTRODUCTION: The questions In this form are designed to obtain enough data about the proposed project and protect site to allow the Commission and staff to adequately assess the project. By taklno the time m ndlro ..,. —.,w �•* •,�„_ ..,• rwr orolece. YOU may alto Include any additional you beileyo is pertinent. Useadditlonal sheets where necessary. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. NAME OF PROPOSAL: Request for Annexation to the City of _ Rancho Cucamonga 2. APPLICANT- Ahmansnn Developments, Inc. 3. GENERAL LOCATION: A portion of the north half of the southeast 1/4 of Section 20, Township 1 North, Range 6 Nest SlIahm 4. Does the apolication possess 100% written consent of each property owner In the subject territory? YES X NO _ (if YES, attach written authorizations.) S. Indicate the reasons that the proposed action has been requested. To permit subject pr:2erty to be included in proposed Wirth Etiwanda Specific P1,,• ' City of Rancho Cucamonga 6. Would the proposal create a totally or substantially surrounded Island of unincorporated territory? YES NO X If YES, please justify the proposed boundary and attach that justification to this application. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAI. I Total laid area: 54.0 Acres 2. Dwelling units in area: Presently none 3. Approximate population in area: Presently none 4. Indicate the General Plan designation of the affected city (if any): Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre) LAFC 3 z, b 4, r, San Bernardino County Gereraf Plan designation: Res - 2 r 2 dwelling units per acre. S. Describe any special land use concerns expressed In the above plans. Alquist - Priolo special' studies zone. 6. Indicate the existing land use. Vacant What Is'tho proposed land use? Residential - low density, 2 -4 dwelling units per acre. 7. Indicate the existing county toning title and densities permitted. Nest Valley Foothill_ .om'- nity Plan, Planned Unit Development- PUD Zone, 8. Has the area been pro - zoned? YES X NO NiA _ If YES, what is the pre - zoning classification, title, and densities permitted. 'L -zone" concurrent pre -zone application filed - Low Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre)- Ln city sphere of influence 9. Will the proposal require public services from any agency or district which Is currently operating at or near capacity (Including sewer, water, police, fire, or schools)? YES _x NO __ If YES, please explain. Please refer to 'Plan of Services" attached. PLAN I'OR SERVICES Section 56653 of the Government Code requires the submission of a Plan for Services with every proposal Initiated by a resolution of a legislative body. Please attach to this application a narrative description of the following: 1. An enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory. -2- _ti 2. A description of the level and rat,ge of these services. I An Indication of when those serices can be extended to the study area. 4. An Indication of any conditions the local agency will impose or require ii within the study area If Out proposal h approved (for example, the pay- ment of fees, the upgrading of structures, roads, water and sewer facil- lifes, etc.). S. Information with respect to how the services will be financed. NOTE: Sponsors of a proposal initiated by petition may submit their proposal without a Plan for Services. Commission polity, however, requires the affected city or district to nevertheless prepare the Plan prior to staff review of the proposal. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION I. State genera, description of topography. General ly sloping to the south - F southeast at approximately 8 %, with no discernible or substantial drainage courses Site is covered with heavy chapparrat vegetation. 2. Describe any existing Improvements in the site as % of total area Residential tl % Agricultural 0 % Commercial 0 % Vacant 100 q, industrial _ 0 % Other 0 3. Describe the adjacent land uses. Vacant 4. Describe site alterations that will be produced by Improvement projects emaciated with this proposed action. (grading, flow channellzatlon. etc.) None S. Will service extensions accomplished by this proposal Induce growth on this site? YES x NO Adjacent sites? YES NO y_ Unincorporated x Incorporated .3- N f, Y� )y t =� 6. Is this project a part of n larger ptoJect or series of projects? YES NO X If YES, please explain. , NOTICES Please provide the names and addresses of persons who are to be furnished caples of the agenda and staff report and who are to be given mailed notice of hearing. _ NAME Craig Page Ahmanson Developments, Inc. ADDPM 1123 Parkview Drive, Suite 300, Covina, CA 91724 NAME The Keith Companies Don Karpinen ADDRESS 200 eakor Street, costa Mesa, CA 92626 NAME ADDRESS CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In the attached exhibits present the data and Information required for this Initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and !n atlon presented herein are true and correct to the st of y knowledge and belief. , Date: -2'1 5.1-TR k % Sigh �� e �fo d l�n[uLtu¢T Phone: oZ5ll -UCJ(1 C.twJiAQ 1�-Q✓ r�,GP To be enclosed with this form: 1S copies of this Exhibit 'A' with Plan for Services 30 copies of the map 30 copies of the legal description 2 copies of the Voter Location List Pre - toning and environmental review documents (If applicable) 2 copies of the Resolution or Petition of Initiation Filing Fees -4- PLAN FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES (Attachment) The purpose of this attachment is to briefly outline the fact,rs of consideration relative to this annexation request and to briefly expand upon the information presented in the Plan for Municipal Services form. Nor — , L. •. Maximum Possible Service Area. The area proposed for annexation contains approximately 54.0 acres and is located fully within Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere of Influence. As the following information clearly indicates, the area in question is also clearly within the maximum possible service area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area is adjacent to current City Limits on the south, (being 1/4 mile northerly) and represents a logical extension of the city's jurisdiction. Rance of Serviced The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a general law City and is legally authorized as wall as capable of providing the full range of necessary urban services within its boundaries. Currently, a full range of necessary urban services is provided within the City Limits by the City and by several independent districts cooperating with the City. The same level of service provided by the City and its cooperating districts is proposed to be provided in the annexation area. C Projected Future Population Growth. The site is currently designated on the County's west Valley Foothills Community Plan as RES 2 allowing up to two units to the acre. The City's General Plan allows residential densities of 2 to 4 units per acre Type of Development Occurring or Planned. The County of San Bernardino has considered, but not acted on, a development project directly southerly of this site (TT 13527) The subject site proposes 131 dwelling units and it is assumed that the City will continue to work closely with the developers in preparation of development plans, and following annexation, will permit development of the project in substantial conformance with the City approvals, subject to the approval of a Pre -zono Development Agreement and other applicable applications. i sb5/2310031 .._e... E. Prosent and F1�r, _ undeveloped ,nature of the site, current too the n-site service needs aro minimal. The consist primarily fire and police protection. It should be noted that this level of,service will be clearly ina wdequate should, the property develop in accordance with the County approved plans, and extensive urban services would be required prior to development regardless es of whether such development would occur in the C City: ounty of units The development of this site with 1] would require sower and water services, eloctricnit natural yas, telephone, solid waste disposal, police and fire protection, schools, libraries, parks and recreation, and other services normally associated with urban intensity development. As alroaas noted, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its cooperating districts are capable of providing a full range of required services F. Local As ncl s aresently Servino Re Ar area es presently se,�ved by the followings local agencies: chino Bari ,Municipal water District; Foothill Fire r:otok a ,n District; San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department: Southern California Edison Company; Southern California Gas Company; Bell s Department of Transportation and Flood Control; Etiwanda Elementary School District; chaffey Joint Union High school District; County of San Bernardino Libraries. As already noted above, the levol and range of services currently provided by these local agencies is minimal, and only adequate to meet present limited service needs. G So. -fat a d r Interdependence. noted, the silo is contiguous to existinglrcity boundary on the south, and depends for access on existing and planned City circulation network. The eito is closely related to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will depend on the City and its associated districts for the necessary urban services. Residents of the site will also depend on businesses in the City of their commer -'al and economic needs. i. located Alr ErUMI ss' 110 part of the property is Preserves. located within any Williamson Act Agricultural a$(o sb5/2]100]1 r. PINE"MOTMT-UMT.-UNT9 A. Sewer aervice. Due to the undeveloped nature of the site, no sewer services are currently being provided. However, the site lies in the jurisdiction of Cucamonga County Water District for sower collection and the China Basin Municipal Water District for waste treatment disposal and reclamation. Upon annexation by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, both Cucamonga County Water District and Chino Basin Municipal -Water District will continue to be the service providers for the area. B. Water Services. No water services are currently being provided duo to the undeveloped nat..re of the site. However, the site is located within the service boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District, which will continue to be responsible for the provision of water to the site upon annexation. C. Spble Television. Cable service is not currently provided to the area. Upon annexation, cable TV will be provided by private vendors under a City franchise. D. Electricity. Electric service is and will continue to be provided by Southern California Edison upon annexation and development of the site. E Solid Waste. The site is currently not being served. Upon annexation, private vendors will provide both collection and disposal services under a franchise by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. F Streets. With the exception of Etiwanda Avenue along the easterly boundaries of the site, there are not streets or roads currently serving the area. Upon annexation and development of the site, the developer will be responsible for construction of all public streets _n accordance with City approvals. Upon substantial complel. on of the street improvements, the City will assume responsibility for maintenance and street swooping. These costs arc estimated at 5 9247.50 per year. The ongoing cost of street lighting will be absorbed through an annexation to (or formation of) a lighting assessment district sb5/2330031 n G. Flood Control. Currant flood control protection is provided by the San Bernardino County Flood Control-- - District. Upon annexation, regional flood control �• issues affecting the site will continuo to be controlled by the ?lood Control District; local drainage and flood control protection will fall under the jurisdiction of the city. It. Community Day loonen current planning and code enforcement services aro provided by San, Bernardinu County. Upon annexation, the City will assume full responsibility for the servicno at an estimated annual cost of $ 1003.86 . I. Leisure services. No parks and recreation services are currently being provided. Upon annexation and development of the site, the developer will be responsible for paying City park fees. In addition, citywido recreation programs currently run by the City will become available to the now residents of the davelopnd site. Finally, library and museum services, currently provided by San Bernardino County, will remain under the County's 3urisdiction. J. Peii o Pro ion Police protection is currently providnd by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Rancho Cucaconga Cubstation. Upon annexation, the County Sheriff will continue to provide police services for the area K. Fire Prot ion The Fc Fire Protaction District currently provided ! rA and rescue services to the area. Upon annexation, the District will continue to provide the necessary services for the project site. Ito paramedic services are currently provided or plarned. L. Ambulance ervi .+n_ Private vendors currently provide anbulanco services to the site. Upon annexation, these services will continue to be provided by private vendors. N Animal Control. Animal control is currently provided by San Bernardino County. Upon annexation, San Bernardino County will continue to provide animal control services. C Yy sb5/2310031 v • � m • N. ,,iZols••_ -The site IS locatedin the Chaffey ,JOlnt Union 4,- High School District and?, 'tha Etivande Elciaentary, School -District. Upon annexation. and . devitlopment, - the' alto will continua to be served.,' by tho� - Etiwan is ,Elementary - School District (E -e) and Cha1•fey; '-Joint, Union High School District. Preliminary dii6ssion with the Etiwanda School ,- District;. indicate the schools are at or near capacity In the area.','potontial -now school sites `have been identifled,inithe immodiato'nearby area: Tho' School Distiiet does shave the ability to charge: fees in accordance, with SB 2926 and in addition tias%' a _one time special district tax of $1,600 per deielling unit. 2%1 ` sbS /2710031 III. 9UNIAg�( The site is located in the City's Sphere, it is ,A contiguous to the City boundaries on the south, and it represents Limits. a logical extenalon of the current City yt. The City, with assistance of its cooperating r agencies, is authorized and capable of providing the full range of necessary urban services for the site. The annexation area is uninhabited and the City's petition for annexation is supported by loot property owner consent. 2%1 ` sbS /2710031 cI Y H � H T u po U a yr 6 ■ 0 z el u q 4 � H -• q .. y aqo OCmi-ZC - -CMo ° o, t 2 a O 1 Y o a M Y Y F o n N Q qY O M V N 4 i 0 i 0 0 0 � i a i W 4 4 4 N a q qqL C C � M A H L y i Y n y M 9 O CN M y 4 _Mp O C q 6 e H H H H Y 9 i Vi L 1 u V q y q y q A Y O 1 Y o a M Y Y F o n N Q qY O M V N 4 i 0 i 0 0 0 � i a i W 4 4 4 N a q qqL C C � M A H L y i Y n y M 9 O CN M y 4 _Mp O C q 6 16 -(La tj v wz f W Nl C11•J J F 4 °0 {UL q C W C• m 6 V T_ Y V e o - �� $ W c c c °° 8a I w•�ql O r ' \ e v Y L L 0 e q 0 c c q pC Z 4■ < C C U 6 V s 12 Z O p. G .O D Z 2 a P Y O H N Y M A L u I L L u u L V a C.r Ll Yf N A q A Y Y p Y• L L Y L N Y N T> T L O O Y c Y e c c y q Y o 0 O L Y L O O YaJT� ll U C LL 4 pl N 2 2 Y N m Y t O O N 4 u 6 a yv V >y Ili O V �• M p yQ O O O O U .Od T_ Y V e VOTER LOCATION LIST TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COWSSiON 175 WEST FIFTH STREET. SECOND FLOOR SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92415 -0490 FROM: SUBJECT: ADMANSON DEVELOPMENTS, INC. For I.AFC UN only 1123 Parkview Drive, Suite 300 Covana, CA 91721 VOTER INFORMATION FOR PROPOSAL JUSTIFICATION The Voter Location Urt h submitted M compliance with requirements for filing proposals with the Local Agency Formation Commission, San Bernardino County. Pleas furnish the beginning and ending house numbers on Own streets creating the exterior boundaries of the Proporat. 00 not list those streats wholly within the area of proposal. The County Planning Department can aid proponents in obtaining or a dnq hoes numbers to vaunt lots or Parcels in unincorporated areas. Pleas call 383.1303 (parcel numbers are rvvulred). Far city house numbers, pleas contact the respective cities. It the am of proppnl is uninhabited, so sun: it no numbering system is In existence, to state and give any Information that will be helpful in locating registered voters. O[DIGTLO ORNONOIQ'GT[O PRES[NTNWMIRS /ROJECT[ON[w CITY NUNO[Rr TO BE ASSIGNLO INPOIWATION ILIST ALL ADDITIONAL [TRLBTNAJACAVEW9. AUJGN[O 11F AI/UGeLU INFORAATION TO ASSIST LANG, ROAD OR OTHER LOGTINO R[plei[RFO VOT[R!I �,�w [tiy„[ 9y.n,Jwr [nGwe 5 a 1g G Proporty is R = W Vacant s 3 b O € LL 0 6 y� S yt F r � O£ p i ]S a{ O■ [ r W •p V* Os L a ITIlNNN Rw. a/a1 1, VAC LTr- S.C.E. S88r2'r07*E 1135.68' FROM:*P.U.D.• VACANT TO, *• SU13JECT PROPERTY PRE•ZONED L SCALE 1'-400' NORTH <)- Dq,4 AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTSINC. 1 .t' sG1h: "ij -� �'s� w} •� -`_ z,i= y;_.`:- �.�':``�:ia}'- 'fit:.'.;= °�-�:SV`ta , ON- SUBJECT PNOPEIITY�; �3G AIMUMIAMAN gum Am" lummu i.A.: {i,i 1�_ '. °rr'i �a_` ^ ta_ ..._ 'i•r .. a" -.-i '.Ia Z. \.^•{• ^ -� t� ��y!• _ e� _ y5p y ��+ yTlp�y 3 i- • �i' .�3"4 .r. Y��4 ^ -Y ��..- r .1 n, "V t t ;r '71'. "3' -k'f5 ... +-,:1! C3 :; -: Nt..ti: - 'h•sy I�J a �..:. r'r- ^ "r�7,yi:° - r-Y.x p�^g+tl. � :Y .K - RANt:NO,:,CUCAM(OMOA •.J.a;'e'p = "'� 10 F EW- NIII16111 City Llmlis ~tv Unincorporated Area Within City OpRero of InflYOaoo VICINITY MAP J }S? RESOLUTION No. 3 0 - 65 -0 A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF kANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION .40 REQUESTING 7HE LOCAL AGENCY FO.WT10N C"ISSION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANMATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIVAHDA AVEk'U£ AND 25TH STREET i „ RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Oucamorge, California; that WHEREAS, the above described property is located within and consistent with the established Sphere of Influence of the City, and contiguous to current City limits; and t WHEREAS, the territory propased to be annexed 1s vacant and uninhabited, and a description of the boundaries of the territory is set forth In Exhibit '1' attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the annexation of the property will represent a logical extension of the City's boundaries and urban services; and WHEREAS, it is the City's intention to provide the usual and necessary urban services to the area upon annexation, as outlined in the Plan of Services; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the annexation of the property to the City would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the property will provide for development within the City in a manner consistent with the City's General Plan and with related development; and WHEREAS, the City Council as govcrning body of the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to inittate proceedings for a Change of Organization (Annexation) for the subject property pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Local Govzrnment Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council as the governing body of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby adopt, approve, resolve, determine, and orier as follows: SECTION 1: Application and proposal is hereby made to the Local Agency Fob of n Camissior. of the County of San Bernardino for Change of Organization (Annexation) to the City of Rencho Cucamonga of the herein described property as outlined in the Justification form, *Mr.h is exhibit 'A” to this Resolution, and is by this reference incorporated herein as though fully set forth it accordance to tie terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortes"nox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certffieT-c—opy-o-f this Resolution with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino. sbS/2310031 � ot �o 4 , LZC DESCRIPTION !.F ATUMSON DEM*PKMM INC. A portion of the north half 'of the southeast 2/4 of Section- 20, Township I North , �ange 6 Nast, SBK d r ::c ibed as fo: Llcws: _ Beginning at,theleast' 2/4 corner of said Section 201 Thance SOD 00132"W. •along tha east line of said Section 20, a distance of 1320.25'foot; Thenca M89 2510,1■N. -Along the south line of the north 1/2 of_' sild Section'20, a distance 'Of '2426.34 feet; , Thence N.44'38t42"E: ,a:distance of 1836.88 teet.to tho north line of the ZOUthea8t:,1%4"of said,SWAJO-1 20; Thence S.25 27107"E.:- ,Albngltbe north line of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 20, a distance of 1135.68 toot to the Point of Beginning. - Subject site contains an area of 54.0 ± acres. sbS/2310031 � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7,,1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the,Cfty Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Hiki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ANNEXATION 88 -01 - PULSAR DEVELOPMENT - A request to approve the Tax -Revenue Exchange for annexation proceedings (LAFC 2503) between the County of San _ Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately 51.47 acres of land -located north of Highiand Avenue, south of Sumrit Avenue extension, east of Deer Creek utility corridor, and west of the County /City boundary - APR: 225 - 161 -19, 12 -30, 49, 53, 55, and 61. ANNEXATION 88 -02 - TERRANCE MIICHER - A request to approve e lax Revenue c ange or annexation proceedings (LAFC 2504) between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately 96 acres of land located at the northwest co•,ner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 226- 07i -05. ANMATION 88-03 - CARYN COMPANY: ETIKANCA HIGHLANDS - A request to apprcve a ax Revenue c ange or annexation proceedings (LAFC 2505) between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately 303 acres of land located at the northeast corner of 24th Street (Summit Avenue) end Hardman Bullock Road - APR: 226- 082 -16, 24 -27. I. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached . reso u ons approving the Tax Revenue Exchange between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. - 11. BACKGROUND: The Tax Revenue Exchange negotiation 1s part of the annexe tTo n proceedings before the Local Agency Formation Commission for Pulsar Development, Terrance Melcher, and Caryn Company: Etiwanda Highlands (Exhibit "A"). These three annexations are scheduled for public hearing before the Local Agency Formation Canmiss '.on on September 21, 1388. Aporoval of the property tax revenue exchange is a prerequisite of the annexation proceedings. QA I Sr, C1TY�CWNCII. "STRFF:REPORT' _ . Mnexatton-88- 01:= fpulaar_Develo nt Annexation "88 -02 :- ,Terrance Malci�r Mnexation'8843:=" Caryn Company September 7;x1988; a(11% rage c -. - -- ' In 1985, when the City annexed the Caryn Planned Coamunity at Highland and Milliken Avenues, the existing formula for the Tax ' Revem:e Exchange was negotiated at that =time. The negotiated formula basid on "historic share" of taxes` received by the City is descrit -ad'fn the-February ,6, 1985 staff report to City Council, (see attached). Botli•,Revenue _ 'Assessment and Finance, Departments have reviewed the &IIocations,.prepared by the County and have indicated Ps their support for the County fundings. a. For the present annexations the historic share of taxes received by the City are as follows: Ak- a LAFC 2503 = Pulsar - .historical share of 4.98% i` o LAFC 2504 - Melcher'- historical share of 5.15% r, o LAFC 250S - Caryn - historical share of 5.13% Any special assessment district tax; for example, Lighting and f Landscaping or Mello Roos, would not have an effect on the property tax received by the City. Therefore, these would be the actual percentages allocated to City General Fund revenues. II1. CONCLUSION: Adoption of the attached resolutions is required to procee w annexation proceedings for the subject properties. ResD f IY s d Br Bul City ne BB:MB:rc Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Vicinity Map Staff Report of February 6, 1985 Resolution for LAFC No. 2503 with Exhibit 'Al'; Negotiated Tax Exchange Resolution for LAFC No. 2504 with Exhibit 'A2'; Negotiated Tax Exchange Resolution for LAFC No, 2505 with Exhibit 'A3'; Negotiated Tax Exchange, a(11% 9"1 PULSAR 88-02 YELCHER 8"3 ETMANDA HIGHLANDS aqq - �" A., P x. i ee oz > k tNCFD CLG a3 PLANNING EXHIBIT, SGLE< Am-- ::� a: f$ a, f CITY Oh ItANCI I0 CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez. City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CARYN ANNEXATION /TAX REVENUE EXCHANGE As part of the annexation proceedings for the Caryn Planned Community site located north of Highland, east of Milliken, the City and County of San Bernardino are required to reach an agreement on the property tax distribution formula to be effective upon annexation. Under normal circumstances, the County uses a standard formula. Under this formula, upon annexation, the cities receive 50 percent of the tax revenue generated by similar properties located within the City limits. This approach allows the County to retain the other 50 percent, under the premise that development of the site will generate new costs for the County, such as social services, law and Justice costs, library costs, etc. However, because Rancho Cucamonga is a post - Proposition 13 city, tha property tax revenues generated in the City and returned to the City are already quite 19w. approximately 4.94 percent. This would mean that by using the standard formula, the City would only receive approximately two and one -half percent of ali revenues generated on the site upon annexation. Staff felt that in our case the standard 50 percent formula was not equitable to the City and consequently negotiated an agreement with the County of San Bernardino which would allow future property tax transfer at the same rate that is in effect elsewhere within the City limits, i.e , 4.94 percent. This is the best ratio possible under the circumstances. To finalize this agreement, approval of the attached Resolution by the City Council is required. Rick Liam City la RG:OK:Jr ATION: It is recumnx:nded that the attached Resolution, setting F share of property tax revenue generated at 4 94 percent be lly subm ted, RESOLUTION NO. 138 �56k A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE MOUNT OF.PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RJXHO CUCAMONGA RESULTI6G FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE DESCRIBED BY LAFC NO. 2503 S ?CTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamunga hereby finds andreetT:T�nes that: A. Pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, prior to the issuance of a certificate of filing by the Local Agency Formation Commission Executive officer, the governing bodies of all local agencies whose service area or service responsibilities will be altered by a proposed jurisdictional change shall negotiate and determine by resolution the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between and among such agencies. B. Except as provided in Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, in the event that a jurisdictional change would effect the service area or service responsibility of one or more special districts, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino shall, on behalf of the district or districts, negotiate any exchange of property tax revenues. C. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino have determined the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged as a result of the following jurisdictional change: LAFC NO. 2503 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves an o. ors that: A. Th e negotiated exchange of property tax revenues between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino, attached hereto as Exhibit "A1" and incorporated herein by refcrence, resulting from the above - described jurfsdictional change will be based on the City's historic share of 4.985 and is hereby approved and accepted. �i - 'City : of = Rancho Cucamonga - - - ; `1988, -;s B. The annual tax - increment generated in the area subject to the Jurisdictional change and attrib+itable to the local'agencies whose-service are or service responsibilities will be altered by the proposed jurisdictional change shall -be allocated in future years pursuant to'the provisions of Section 98 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby t' directed to cerzify to the passage of this Resolution and to cause a certified copy to be sent to the Fxecutive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino. n I 30;L ■ PAGE IOFI E:01I3I2 AL ANNE%ATIONTOTHE ` .r z CI iyoflanchocuumonga `LAFC t MOS. 2503,2504AND2S: 0afa CITY►ERCENT49X NEXEAARt 'Pc—�� C WLM LAFC25" TRA # - 70008 70007 70007 MV S 1,053,099 112,828 1,735,076 REVENUE 4 10,831 1,128 17,351 CHANGEIN BASE YEAR CHANGE IN BASE YEAR CHANGE IN BASE YEAR FOR USE IN — H40-M FOR USE IN HEBm FOR USE IN IMM TOTAL COUNTY Gonaral Oparationt $ (230) S (26) S (387) S (643) Flood Control flood 2cr,: 6tnary _ (281) _ (30) _ (467) _ (778) Tataltounty: S Sit $ 56 $ 854 $ 1,421 OTHER AFFECTED AGENCIES* CSA n0 S (2) (0) $ (3) S (5) CSA 070 ZONE N (25) (2) 36 (63) Tota) Affected Agencies: (27) (2) (39) (68) TOTAL (533) (58) (893) (1,489) TRANSFER TO CITY S S38 58 893 S 1,489 PAGE IOFI IA!ij: Y z-, "` �. -w: i..^ �'� .'IA+I �1i��17. -., ..- • •r �'1 - i.' "w 2�f w.l: F r.� I AProperty Tax Revenue and Proport, ms by Agency as Estimated by the - T% Auditor - Controllor PerZSB 180, Section 99(b) (1) -(3) pl r ;R ANNEXATION TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LAFCN 2503 a CITY OF ACho CUCAMONGA`S% rovenue In major TRAI 4.98% A Ell 4 TRA h 70008 ( AV 61,OB3,099 TAX REVENUE. s10,B31 _« FY 1988 -89 ESTIMATED CURRENT hY TA% — --- DISTRIBUTION % TAX REVENUE i" _ C'IUNTY -- ----------------------- - - - - -_ - - - - - -- r ...,eral Operations 34.98% 3,789 vFlood Zone N 1 4.54.( 492 Flood Control Admin Library 0.35% 38 2.59 %. 281 t. TOTAL COUNTY ------------------ ---- 4,599 OTHER AFFECTED AGENCIEa --------------- --- - - ---- CSA 70- COUNTY WIDE 0.02% 2 CSA 70 ZN A -WEST END 0.23% 25 FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION 12.77% 1,383 WEST END RES CONS DIST 0.16% 17 CHINO MUNI WTR MID -VLY 1.80% 195 CHINO BAS MUNI WTR IMP C 3.43% 372 10t1l Other Affeetr_ Agencies Ti TAI Prepar+rl Bvt Approved By .0v 1, OOn --------------------- - evvv.vsvvvavvevnvn� many i i Date, Datel EXHIBIT Al. „� , . V i Cr/ 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO - CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, - DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE EXCHINGED BETWEEN AND NiONG THE COUNTY U OF SAN BER_NARDINO AND THi: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIK;A RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE DESCRIBED BY LAFC NO. 2504 ti SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and Ueffie-m-raes that: A. Pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, prior to ttio issuanco of a certificate of filing by the Local Agency, Ft•retation Commission Executive officer, the govern!ng bodies of all local agencies whose service area or service responsibilities will be altereJ by a proposed jurisdictional change shall negotiate and detemine by resolution the amount of prope.,ty tax revenues to be exchanged between and among su0 agencies. B. Except as provided in Section 99.1 0! the Revenue and Taxation Code, in the event that a juMsdfctional change would effect the service area o; service responsibility of one or more special districts, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sat Bernardino shall, on behalf of the district or districts, negotiate any exchange of property tax revenues. C. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino have determined the amount of propert,, tax revenues to be exchanged as a result of the follot,•1ng ,jurisdictional change: LAFC NO. 2504 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga :Iereby resolves an or ors that: A. The negotiated exchange of property tax revenues between the City of Rarcho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino, attached hereto as Exhibit "A24 and incorporated herein by reference, resulting from the above- described jurisdictional change will be based on the City's historic share of 5.15% and is hereby approved and accepted. I '3 ■ F'„ LAFC 25u4 . City of Rancho Cucamonga Page September 7, 1988 B. The annual tax increeent generated in the area subJect to the Jurisdictional change and attributable to the local agencies whose service are or service responsibilities will be altered by the proposed Jurisdictional change shall be allocated in future years pursuant to the provisions of Section 98 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. SECTION 3; The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to certi y to the passage of this Resolution and to cause a'certified copy to be sent to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Comaission of the County of San Bernardino. 305 WIBIT A2 ANNEXATION TO THE CO�[CZ�/X7 City of Rancho Cuamonya LAFCNO$.2503,2504 AND 250S CITY PERCENT IN ANNEXED AREA 4.9% CL�3/aG 25791 Total Affected Agencies: f ?7) ( �) (39) (08) TOTAL (533) (58) (893) (11489) TRANSFERTO CITY f 538 58 893 S 1,489 PAGE 1 OF 1 t� 0 c LAF 2503 LAFC2SO4 LuC2S05 TRA * 70008 70007 70007 MV S 1,083,099 112,828 1,735,076 REVENUE $ 10,831 1,1;:8 77,351 CHANGEIN BASEYEAR CHANGE IN BASEYEAR CHANGEIN FORRU„N FOR USE IN BASEYEAR FOR USE IN 19AL_ !9 89 TOTAL •� COUNTY Ganatrao aatlom S (230) f (26) f (387) Flood f (643) Flood tom Library (281) Total County: S 511 f 56 S 854 f 1,421 OTHER AFFECTED AGENCIES - CsA •70 f (2) (0) f (3) S (5) C5A#70 ZONE (25) (t} 36 (63) Total Affected Agencies: f ?7) ( �) (39) (08) TOTAL (533) (58) (893) (11489) TRANSFERTO CITY f 538 58 893 S 1,489 PAGE 1 OF 1 t� 0 c %vtal Otnsr gffoct ed ggene)sa PraDarad 8y: go4.oYFU Dyt 94) 7214 ------------------------ Dated Date= � --I EXHIBIT p2. �Tk F. h Froper'ty Tax Rwwws and ProPOrtlona by R@vnry as Eatiroated DY tAS F.' t Auditor- Cor2rajjr Per 3D 1802 Sec:i"m 33fD) fl) -f3) n i ' ANNEXATION TO) CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA 45 i LgFCM 3504 ) d RAIKFIC CUCgMONOg2S X rwenus in RaJar TARS 8.1 JF TAA d 7VOU7 AV x1132838.00 TAX REVENUE 712128 < FY 1387 -D8 ESTIMATED CURRE7fT TAX DISTRIOUTION 9 TAX REVENL'� COUNTY -_ -- General OPerationa 36.31% Flood ZOrID x 1 4. SOX 472 SJ Flood Control Aduin 0.36% L1Drary 2.699 4 so TOTAL COUNTY --------------- --- - --- -- 749-3 OTHER AcFECTED AGENCIES ------------------ - --- -- CSR 70 O. 03X 0 O C9A 70 ZONE A O.37x FOOTHILL FIRE PAomcrION 13.16% HCST END RES CONS D79T 0.189 140 CHINO DASI11 NUNS HTR -MV 1. COX CHINO DASIN MUNI HTR -IZC J.SJX 27 40 %vtal Otnsr gffoct ed ggene)sa PraDarad 8y: go4.oYFU Dyt 94) 7214 ------------------------ Dated Date= � --I EXHIBIT p2. RESOLUTION NO.� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY ' OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE DESCRIBED BY LAFC NO. 2505 ;fir' SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby i, finds and ee erm nes that: A. Pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, prior to the issuance of a certificate of filing by the Local Agency Formation Com fission Executive Officer, the governing bodies of all local agen»les whose service area or service responsibilities will be altered by a proposed 965, jurisdictional change shall negotiate and determine by resolution the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between and among such agencies. B. Except as provided in Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, in the event that a jurisdictional change would effect the service area or service responsibility of one or more special districts, the Board of Supervisors of the Canty of San Bernardino shall, on behalf of the district or districts, negotiate any exchange of property tax revenues. C. The City Council of the City of °ocho txn w•••yr a::, the Board of Supervisors or the Counts of Sa•i Bernardino Save determined the wsnt rt ppecoa -, ta< revenues to be vOan,r d as a suit of tha juMCi'ccienai change: LAFC A0. 2505 - rITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO -IL! SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cicvuv va hereby resolves anFFUe—rs that: A. The negotiated exchange of property tax revem,es between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino, attached hereto as Exhibit "A3" and incorporated herein by reference, resulting from the above -described jurisdictional change will be based on the City's historical share of 5.159 and is hereby approved and accepted. 3 °7 , Y CITY•COUNCIL e J LAFC -2505 : CitY'of:,Rancho Cucaeonga , Septeaber 7,,,1980 Y, Page 2 Br 0. The annual tax increment generated in the area" subJect to the Jurisdictional change and attributable to the local, agencies'rAiose service are or service C responsibilities will be altered by the proposed Jurisdictioral change shall be allocated in`future years 'pursuent to the provisions of Section 98 of the Revenue and,'jaxatlon Code., SECTION 3: The 'City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed o cer y to the passage of, this Resolution and to cause'a certified copy to be sent to the Eia^cutive Officer of the Local Agency Formation ' Coamission of the County of San Bernardino. �� D .WpxRlezr "'rt a4'„ '$'mow ,""•.�?�; �• S KC: ANNEXATION'IOTHE city RanchoCucarno of ga t LAFCNOS.23(13,2504AN02SOS CITYPERCENTINANNEXEDAAEA 4.9% l 4 LAFC2503 LA_ FC2504 LAFC250S / Tw r 70008 70007 70007 M V $ 1,083,099 112,828 1,735,076 REVENUE S 10,831 1,128 17,351 ; CHANGE IN CHANGE IN CHANGE IN H BASE YEAR BASE YEAR FOR USER R USES FOR USE IN FOR USE IN 751489 1984f9 TOTAL COUNTY General Operations S (230) $ (26) S (387) Control S S (643) , i Flood Zone Library (281) — 30 (4671 n78) Total County: S 511 S 56 $ 854 $ 1,421 OTHERAFFECTED AGENCIES` CSA 070 f (2) (0) S (3) S (5) CSA 470 ZONE N (25) (2) 36 (63) ( r Total Affected 3 Agencies: (27) (2) (39) (68) TOTAL (538) (58) (893) (1,489) TRANSFER TO CITY $ 538 58 893 S 1.489 PAGE IOFI y BJ� ■ r. Property Te>t Roverm& end Proportttns by Ag&nry oe Gat ]raa ted by tt.o- 'fit ?y AuCS tcr- CerrtroIlsr P&r SD 160, 5&otio 33rb) (11 -tJ) + Ah7'EXATION TOt CITY OF RAM;HO CUCAMONOA Ir' J LAFCe 219 .l RAI.LfO CUCRMONGAtD % revenus in fflbj - TRAI 9.157 7RA P 70007 Y AV 71, 7J9,076. Up TAX RcV_h'1C 917, J91 4 FY 1967 -66 E3TIMATE3 CURT7,.r TAX D19TRIDU77ON % 1'AX' REVENWX COUNTY 6mraroI Odoretaons 36. 57X 63751, F:ec.d Ion& 0 1 4.669 617}if Control Adnin 0, 3B% 62 :brary 2. 69X 457 TOTAL COUIITY a7, 676 y' OTHCR AFFHC7ED AOENCIcJ - - "'- Th CSR 70 A. U2X 3 e�l C3A 70 :014E A k" FOOTHILL FIRE PROTCCTION ]J. 16% p2 d3 36 V tJE'3T END RCS CONY DIRT 0. 1B% 3: CHINO NUNS NTR JIST -MV ! I. 65X J2t CNINO NUIII wrR DS ?T -IIC 3, S4% 614 A2 i - « Ot.ro• Affo ^ted Rgs••caoa nyi �r SJ, 29U � ................ « ......... Dot &l Dot&t EXHIBIT A,J f CITY OF RA-NCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DA September 16, 1988 Tot City Council FROM Lauren H. '2- sserman, City bi SD83ECIt Labor CamEPr.LUE__ On Wednesday %f this weak, we learned from Councilaember Wright that there are still severe problems with the labor cane sits on Arrow Highway near Vineyard. Apparently the problems have been going on for quite so" time( however, it was not brought to our attention. In response to the problem, ve will be meeting with representatives from the Fire District and Sheriff's Department to develop a "plan of attack for solving the problem. We hope to have the matiug before Wednesday night so I will be able to comment on it at that time. As you may be avare, we bad a suit filed against the City and the developers of the site by the Center for Law and poverty. The allagation was that by requesting rencval of the substandard structures, we had eliminated low coat housing from the community. It is my understanding, although I have not confirmed it, that the suit has been dropped and is no longer an issua. In summary, at Wednesday evening's meeting we hope to have a status report on how we err. dealing with the problem, as wall as a schedule on when other projects may be constructed on that site. please contact me if you have any additional questions prior to Wednesday night's meeti.Ag. LHWtjls 1301/88 -665 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 1, 1988 T0: Chairman and !embers of the Planning Commission FROM: ✓Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission BY: Rib Arione Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: THOMAS HOUSE SITE, 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA (OR 88 -11) BACKGROUND: A Purpose: behpurpose nd potheof recommendations to tthe�P Planning the Commisite from ha Thomasrlouse..serAttachedo aam the rH? torie Preservation Commission and City Council Staff reports as well as the Archeological Resource Review from the Archeological Informatior. Center. B. Recomeendation for Landmark Desi nation: The consultant who con c a survey o s r ca resources in 1987 14sted the house as having local, county and state significance. and the indicates that it has potential �National l Register status.LiThe consultants determined that the house is significant because it was built and owned by the ltow.s family, obviously a family of local historical importance. The house was scheduled to be considered for landmark designation at a later date but was taken out of sequence because of the proposal to build an office building on the site. 1n determining historical significance, the Historic Preservation Commission considers the information in the historical survey that staff has developed against criteria listed In the Historic Preservation Ordlnan6e. The house was recommended for landmark status because of the importance of the Thomas family and because there was : possibility that it could be moved orto the site of the Thomas A aza. Landmark status would mean involvement by Historic Preservation Commission in the review of the new site and the rehabilitation of the building C. Recommendations to the Planning Commission re ardln Hovin e u n you now, un er , a e termination ' must e made—that a project under consideration will not have an adverse impact on the environment. the 'environment includes THOMAS HOUSE September 1, 1988 Page 2 historically significant buildings. (CEQA, Appendix 6, Sfgnificant Effects, 'A project wfil normally have a significant effect on the environment If it will:.... (j) disrupt or adversely affect A prehistoric or historic archeological site or a property of historic or cultural significance to a community or ethnic or social group...'; and CEQA, Environmental Checklist, II 20. If a project may have an adverse effect, either an EIR must be prepared which, among other things, considers feasible alternatives, or a mitigated negative declaration is issued which satisfactorily mitigates the adverse Impact. The conditions that a good faith effort be made to move the building and an amount equal to the cost of demolition be contributed toward the moving of the building appeared to be appropriate mitigations. (At the time these conditions were written, there seemed to be a good chance that the house would be moved to the Thomas Plaza). D. Conditions for Demolition Annrny al: The condition about ocumen ng u ng s to be demolished was proposed as a mitigat;on because of the importance -,f the Thomas family to this comrunity. Documentation consists of black and white 35 A photographs of all elevations of the building and the garage, a site plan, and plan view of the house. Th is information is placed in the Historic Preservation Coimission files along with historical information, to be used as a community resource and for future historians. The condition of not demolishing the building until a totter regarding financial ability to undertake the development is presented came from the experience with the Klusman House which was demolished and nothfug developed in its place. The reaction to that unfortunate circumstance was that it should not occur again. The Historic Preservation Coamfssion understands that not everything can be saved, but it at least wants assurance that as much of the City's heritage as possible is kept and that something good is replacing the historical buildings that are lost. Condition Re ardin the Heed to Conduct an Archeolo ical urve pointed out Above, requ rem an env ronmen a ana ys s that includes impacts on archeological sites. Staff had recently learned that the state Archeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum is available to do reviews for CEQA purposes, giving their professional opinion on the need for further archeological work on sites proposed ,r THOMAS HOUSE - ki x A w September 1, 1988 F Page l for development. This project was of two j, -one that stiff sent to the Center as a dsaonetration at no charge.of the services it has to offer. The report indicated, among,- othen,thfngs, that the potential for the presence of archeological, resources in was unknown and therefore a field reconna;csance,survsy'should ek be done and -appropriate mitigation measures should be proposed based 'a on the findings• Therefore, staff proposed ,an archeologleal survey. The report indicated that an = environmental impact review should be prepared,'- but staff thought that a condition prescribing a reconnaissance and follow -up was sufficient. II. CONCLUSION: i In the future, Historic Preservation Commission staff reports and other back -up material will be forwarded to the Planning Commission 11! whenever there are recommendations from the Historic Preservation Commission to the Planning Commission; and the; Historic Pre servation Commission will keep the Planning Commission informed about Its on -going activities. In this way, the Historic Preservation Commission hopes to improve its cocaunication with the Planning Commission. BB:mig cc: City Attorney Historic Preservation Commission Lester Ross, Archeological Information Center Brad Buller Larry Henderson Chris Yestaan City Council Ed Combs Attachments: A: Historic Preservation Commission and City Council - Staff Reports on the Thomas Noise -- 8: Archeological Information Center Report M, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA x ` STAFF REPORT n DATE: August 17, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council t FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlcnb Banks, Associate Planner 7 SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEYARD 1 I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends iffatihe City Council dasignate, The Thomas House, 7989 Vineyard, Rancho Cucamonga, .2 landmark. II. BACKGROUND: This sits was brought to the CoW ssion's attention in canner on with a proposed office buildingy (DR 88 -11). !ts status on the list of designated and potential landmarks is PLL/PSL /PAL, Potential Local Landmark, Potential State Landmark, and Potential National Landmark. The reason for its significance is its association with the Thomas Vineyards Utnery, It was built in 1926 by H.H. Thomas and sold to L.R. Thcaas win owned it until 1941; it then was transferred to William L. Thomas. It is a simple Craftsman- influenced bungalow. When this house was first being considered, there appeared to be a good possibility that the building could be moved onto a site within the Thomas Winery Plaza complex across the street. It appears however, that the cost of rebuilding the rather high foundation, rewiring and making other changes for commercial use is too high to make enving feasible, according to Rudy Stroink, Project Manager for the Thomas Winery Plaza development. The owner, Edward R. Combs, is opposed to designation and to anything that would delay or add costs to his office project. The Commission did not expect that the building would be retaineJ on site; however, the Commission did want to encourage its preservation by encouraging it to be moved. III HISTOR L PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: The Historic Preservation Cass on vo - 0. 2 a sen , recommend designation of :he Thomas House as a landmark. They also included recouended Conditions of Approval in the hopes of encouraging the relocation Of the house: THDMAS�HOBSE...+�- „r,y"� �.w _ ..,. . -• :s c "• Augustl�l7, IgZ3#4py� .G .', Pik I. That tlSe [muse ;be moved to a suitable location, and the developer contrtDute torafd _the move cost ord I loa, r an amount equal to the x, y emo a, . 2. If the structure cannot be moved, that .a demolition permit not be issued until, building ppermits are ready to be issued and a F)t. letter recalved" aranteetng that.'finanefrg has been sc,ureA. In addition, ,the,” house 'should,,be fully documented with measurements, photographs, and furthsr research. fa The reason for the,second recommendation is the experience with the ` conditions House' that k reasan�b',eai�n shad t thz deaolli on of a historical se significant structure is considered an environmental impact under C£QA (California £nvircnaental Quality Act); that Kist be mitigated unless an £nvironeental Impact Report 1s prepared and a statement rp, of overriding considerations adapted• Therefore .-.,these; two ; k _ conditions could be used as mitigation measures for e a wegativo v , Declaration for the office project. {. t 1 ad Bu 7, 83:AB:mlg Attachments: Historic Preservation Caa9lssion Staff Reports ' Site Plans Resolution o - .mw ,J r 1q et. Latho'LVdeein.= "r7tid sY'�$'•'�l; {.. tDDileat4a ter ". -E *:: 121 1glIc C I.o1AlADY tw ea L977tIQh1 C nla4na CowO. Aeaas 710es. slm� ,1. tlatone Aau, It txelat�tr lsee4 ;: h. Street or bnl dddreeae /p, Ytn 1 1 CSt7s 4.!!a tecemnre Styr e11D Cwtrt Sege ter..lelnn i /.uaaw'e Darter b.__lyT -IOt-0t teael tr 1! tMll el. Sett, Level GeaulptMt_]_t. lIle 11� ` 9 STeanT Oe.n. it ba..t:�Sbtr.us alt • r.. <.n " Clt7t Imtue zips +Iles O.•areelp Ls D.hlle Drleatr= a. Mu.T Out O.Ide.t. Original Oue tt la. it Otbt Pont .eau MWE IpTtw a- alletly 4urW the are.... peretta' •a.ea .. .traat.rt, and u.arlhe u7 lij- albra of th. ale. or eo.4tlwt]u ]n4 r t ITr° Lq oNt1u1 1 lewta rKeilee etrta. rl l I tlelee. 7. tetatlw •btu .rl (4e. t ].Del t. Lryt0.Late D.ap•rq elue site Y! •erreeatlag uM4, rot". aw Draai.aet lud.ar .I, tot hire UO tut) troatage tM Depth nD or appear. acm v- g. Caadltlogs (rhut can) .• iraellear— h. GDOd_ Su S44 nn4p term d• pgrlanbd� e. an longer in erluente 10. to the t1.t.res a. Altered ?_t he IlaaltaneT [ 11. hrrraandi.plt (that rnre the one it pueua") a. Open lead D• telldential [ 0. zaattmd-hailategeX d. Deo•e11 Da11t -Opp .. Cement, let [ i �! WtoriO WOtar. � � "Otto Velet,ot tatu.Yllh latarlllG /Ti0. - -, y xll �. I. „*-'"�. r-r;S.K ri rf;-_4•s,+ - P. 'G: +, -_�. -, +.. -'-�c •r �,' -,. •:��.,•- .t -. + -.� i- 'k. •� • � 4t. .. �.� ''7,�.'n }'ALFryr��t Tenn to ells. . r Vw• ,rd •• pat• MaeG.�� 0. Print• "nlophen_L, ,e: •S , zalalf • �T 1J ., 'L'.k, . 0. Rhlle forte ptnJwt� ••p `� . T AdAII t�,I OtMr� qtes of nala” phetetnWfmL.l9t/ r.r ' fOt9r no fellotiq (([tea ibU> an for Atreatons "17, ` lt. Maury Manny h.IltlA9 Material, " _.. a, 1. GASak� C. Stucco d. Adam A. fe" e. Oth•i, Is. 1s the stluatarc, A. Oa Lt. erlsint eitdr t h. acted? a. pak a , Is. I.. at leftist fantructla, HIS This Date n, a, recta., r h. setlrt d IT- Architect (!t kman), r 19. Radian (it bans),_ N.M. Tla.,, e 19• ",clod )ntonn a. Mtn- h, CarAln hadec a. Octlatse_ d. a "(m) A. rental Caracm, !. 11ad111 C. UnrOurnitasno.ao h. ansr 1. lbao pIQII10Af09 20. 9rletlr mn, hlatorietl tedler architecture, lapart.w• (tested. dabs. Gnats, ud hatches hemostat" sits, the Sit, tin haon), lull[ !r .b tar tM Taeect dully of Ttra, rl rd On II t, I t rLr. I 21. Yale tbew of n* historic n.aart.t fawk heir as), 1. AnhltwMn_ k. Arta h L•te.r• C. zcadcalellsdstrial_ d. Gorsrdan! . b dplanttoe tdwtl•rat�� t mliltarf_ 9. A.1l9ihe h. swulte¢....ISO zz. 9wra.e, List hacks, aot.antc. ""ye. "na , Idtenlou, MaA tall eaten zz. tat* ran pmand- her. 1Ml By tetw), w., lint Address* Oitr) ztpl� Phase, Onsa Wttaa,_ city of Ilab Ca,!Onc r �— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2, 1988 TO: Chairs+an and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE 7990 VINEYARD, THE THOMAS HOUSE, A HISTORIC LANDMARK - APR: 207 - 102 -09 I. ACTION RE ESTED: That the Historic Preservation Commission es gna auras House a Historic Landmark. II. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The site is located near the southwest corner of San ar8 narUno Road and vineyard; it is north of the Thomas Brothers Winery. B. Site Land Use - 2on1a - GenereT 21 an Designation: The site 1s a single family Ouse. s zon ng ermined by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. It is zoned CC, Community Commercial (includes a wide variety of uses including drug stores, supermarkets, and commercial recreation uses for neighborhood /district level commercial goods and services). It has a Commercial General Plan designation. The site is part of the Foothill - Vineyard Activity Canter, in Subarea II. C. Surrounding Land Uses - Zoning - General Plan Designation: North - Single family residential; Zoned MR, Medium Density Residential (8 -14 units per acre) In the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Designated M, Medium Density Residential (8-14 units per acre) in the Land Use Plan of the General Plan. South - Large, mostly vacant lot with a residence at the southern edge; Zoned CC Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan designation is Commercial. East - Across vineyard the land is currently vacant, but the Thomas Brothers Winery mixed use cousserciall project has been approved. The land is zoned CC, Comsunity Cosercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan designation is Commmrcial. June 2, ^1998_;" Page 2 Nest - "Mily apartment buildings; Zoned CC, Comwni;y Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan designation is Commercial. D. Descri Lion: The house is a simple and pplain Craftswan- rafter tails�,naafront with facinghorizontal roof. and full length front porch, a river rock foundatiian and rock porch piers. Square Posts support the porch roof. There are wood frame sash windows and corner boards. III. ANALYSIS: A. Background - Current: This house is on the list of potential histor c s s an was scheduled for a hearing in 1990. It is identified as being of potential state and national interest. It has come to our attention because of a proposed office development which would probably lead to its removal. B. Background - Historlc: The house was built by H.H. Thomas in 192D a n so L.R. Thomas, according to the State Historic itu was transferred to Ikrie J. Thomaowned ho Thomas who from 1941 to 1942 when it as transferred to William L. Thomas. It is one of several structures around the Thomas Winery built and used by the Thomas family. C. �Sli�nn"fance: This house has some signifiance because it has nor .been altered and is an example of a stcple Craftsman influencad bungalow. It gains oast of its signifiance, however, from the fact that it is associated with one of the built by and for members of the family asoth yMbuilt.upntheir vineyards and their winery business. D. Cit Policies: The City's general policy to preaerve sites of s r c n rest is applicable to this property. It is shown on the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan map but the Plan does not mention the historic significance of this building. E. Issues: There is A question about whether an office complex couTd' incorporate a bungalow into its plan. There is also a question about whether future street widening would encroach upon the structure which is alrea4y close to the right -of -way. - r - n ..nnrn� ♦vw 4URm1d�lUN ' ':%r �/Fi 4„`��.i+ l `^ Page If this structure is determined to have historic significance and is recognized as either a Landmark or a Point of Historic r Interest, them under the California Environmental Quality Act, demolition : of such a structure would -be an adverse' environmental I have to be Statepient of spells out xictly rConsiderations' h adversebimpacts Issued mitigated and states the reasons that the project should go forward �( despite the adverse impacts.) Mitigations could take the fors of adaptive reuse or moving. F. Enviremmental Assessment: Designation of a Historic landmark s oxsmp rom requ rements (Article 19, Sectlo,r 15308), ;w IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The structure nests several criteria of the s r c reserve an Commission Ordinance. A. Historical and Cultural Sfgnlffcance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once camon but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark was connected with an important family. 4. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare, D. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. The roDosed ladraark in its location represents an estabpisp d and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and city, (Ordinance 70 -S9, 1979). Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the 'Dail spar . as spoken to the owner, Mr, Ed Combs. —� '1; W. s Y. RECOINEHOATION:. Staff recommends that the Historic Preservatton omm s>'isiOn re ;Nimend to the City Council that the Thomas House be designated a Historic Landmark, Respectfull submitted, Osenior-Plan"ner Henderson LII :AB:mg Attachments: Resolutions Site Location r - =s tf Sun 0Cwbrnn— Tnegenl.,A, .ay Str No. 1730 — 57 gE /AgixreNTO //agxa AND RECREATION HAB$___HAEq_Loc_SHLNo._VRStaN1�- UThi• A 11- 46171n_177gt7n HISTORIC: RESOURCES INVENTORY B D IDENTIFICATION 1. Common name Thomas House 2. Historic mme; TheirrAq HnnsP 3. Strest or nnl address. 7980 Vineyard Avenue c;" Ran_ho Cucamonga Z:p 91730 County San Bernardino County a. Parcel numban 0207- 102 -09 5. Present Owner. William W. Nix Addrnr._578 W. Armsley Savare City Ontario Zip 91762 Or.neMip is: Public Pnvata X 6. Present Us@:_ residence original use: residence DESCRIPTION 7a. Artmtecturatrnn: Craftsman Bungalow 7b. Briefly describe tale pnuntPAYpc/f /PPI/pnce of the sit, or smimne and desanbe any motor albntions from its original corWnio l: A single story rectangular structure of wood construction Roof is front gable, with wood shingles. Rafters are exposed Siding is woad clapboard Windows are in groupings of three, of narrow double hung windows located on either side of a fixed double sash Front door is multiple panel with an upper panel of glass and lower panels of wood. An integrated proch is located along the front of the structure, with rock base pillars supporting rectangular wood pillars extending to the ceiling and a wood balustrade with an "X" pattern Front porch is of wood with concrete steps extending straight out Foundation is wash rock A small extension is located to the rear of the structure with shed type roof There is some mature shrubbery along foundation A separate garage is located to the rear of the structure, with side gable roof, wood clapboard siding, double hung windows and standard garage door OPR 523(11". 1 1/05) B. Construction data: 1926 En.mand Factual__ 9. Amhitact unknown lo. Builder H H. Thomas 11. APProx. ProPerty site (in fast) Frontage +20 oaptn___UQ or sppfnx. acreage 12. petals) of enclosed ohotegracnln July 1987 -`I nil•' Condition: Exultant Good fal. Deteriorated No tonpu In aairtma ' (� 14. �- Altuatlort: None apparent 1L SornonAnpa:(Check mote than oru it netaaary Open land % % �efued bulldlega�OuwNbuiit•up�� . Paddemla, IrWUm1Y ,Comm rdY A emu, !� to Thaan to tln: None kmwn— hlrandawlopnent X Zoning_ VwMYipn PublkWorld amim Chhw. bI i 17. Istheatnrcnaa: oniuorkdnYdn) x MoTW? unknown? ' i I& Rallied fame: N/A SIGNIFICAr10E 3 te. Briefly new hbtmkY and /m architettwai imponanu tintlude data, neon, and persona uwgapd Win Ms,l[al This is one of several structures constructed around the Thomas Winery that were built _ and used by members of the Thomas family and by some of the workers at the Winery. '- This particular structure was built in 1926 by H H. Thomas, and was then sold to L. R Thomas who owned the structure from 1926 until 1941. It was transfered to Marie J. Thomas from 1941 to 1942, and then was transfered to William L. Thomas. t h` 21 Main Mime of We hinoric ntomcs: (If moo Man ore is marked. nwnbar in order of knpornntcl Archlutture Ana d Lsl re Emmmk/Indunrial . Ti- ExolmadonrSatCamartt Gow mont Military Religion SPtlY/Edw tiro 21. SOUr S Milt book,, dotwnann, oover4 pwsmul lnory; a and th11r datal. "A Field Guide to American Houses," Virginia b Lee McAlester; San Bernardino County Assessor Records; personal inter- view with Ada Cooper, November 1987. 22. Dan form PreparedNovember 1987 By (mama) Lynn Mern Org,nitauon Addren: City ZIP Photo: Loatknal With map (draw and I" tin and wrmutWing ,vain. roads, and pmminw:t landmark,): [j1RAuts Moasc $Y&Mtr snt.OWN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEfARD AVENUE rRIMXTC I. BACKGROUND: This Item was continued at the June 2, 1988 Historic We—siefrv--afTbn Commission meeting. The Commission wanted an opportunity to consider the relationship of the house to the proposed Site Plan and to see how the widening of Vineyard Avenue would affect the house. Attached Is a copy of the existing site plan, elevations, grading pian, landscape plan, and the proposed site plan. The existing house and garage would have to be removed to execute the plan as shown. According to Engineering staff, widening of Vineyard Avenue would leave an ample parkway in front of the house. The proposed office structure is even slightly closer to Vineyard. II. UPDATE: The Thomas Winery Plaza across the street from this house mays able to incorporate the house in its development which Includes an adaptive reuse of existing buildings as well as new construction. The project manager, Rudy Strolnk, is considering a number of questions about the cost of moving, the feasibility of renting the space, parking spaces, and other considerations before he can recommend such a move. The owner of the house, Ed Combs, is opposed to anything that could delay building his project. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff still recommends that the Historic 7r—es—er—v—aEro—n—Comiss ion recommend designation of the Thomas House as a landmark because of its association with the Thomas family as explained in the June 2, 1988 staff report. Furthermore, staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend to the Planning Commission that they condition their approval of the design of the proposed office buildings with one of the following: 1. That the house, and if possible the garage, be moved to a suitable location off the property, such move to be partially funded by the developer (at 'east. f , high end cost of demolition). ` y„ HPAI� HI JuC 1 �AldiAIIK,= ;THBMAS HOUSE 986'a °, �,r , Page 2 2. If after a.good faith effort there is no place to which to move the structure(s), that a permit for demolition cae issued until bufldiqg ermforr the Project are ready to be issued -1d aletter is received by the City Planner guara..Aeing that financing for the project has been secured. The lhoatas House must be fully documented with photographs, drawings, and further research by a professional historic preservation consultant to create as complete a record as possible h"4 1M.. of the Respectfully submitted, Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:te Attachments: Site Utilization Map Building Elevations and Section Conceptual Grading Plan Conceptual Landscape Plan Site and First Floor Flan Allow MeMOMMAL C5� \KXrrH CITY OF rrEkt, R -VNCHO CILCAMO�GA Tom PLANNING DIVISION use EXHIBrra. SCALE:. is x' Acting Chairman Uanks,stated that the idea of moving the as presented to the Etiwanda Historical Society, but 1t 1s really to stated that maybe they could desfgn'the` new barn as a replica anlGfng from the barn. Sho stated that she was concerned over the t ven by the Mater District to move the barn. -� Arlene Banks stated that it was her understand g that the 30 to 60 days was to decide If the /s7nae da Historical Society s interested, not to make the arrangements. Larry tarry Henderson that the Mater D1 rict is concerned about liability ff K Commissioner Artied to recoaa;en desig"tion of 9370 Etiwanda Avenue, the as of CouncllafarGrape approval. Products s 7nsslene Naskvttziie�caadednt�he Interest the lhe motion was carried by thowing vote AYES- COMMISSIONERS: AYES: A9HER, HASKYITI, ARM, BALKS, COOPER A Nom: CCIERS: HONE ABSENT: COMBILLINGS, SCMIIDT -- carried Arlene B anks questif the Commission agreed with staff as to do umentation of tlding. The Commission con . ` • *gee• E. A P7.aPIM: m nrereu.re ...� . ..............� ____ Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Acting Chairman Banks questioned if the City Council Resolution would be able to include the two recomiendations to the Planning Commission. She stated tl 't she wanted the City Council to be aware that the Historic Preservation Cwmisstan 1s amore of orner apposition and is taking mitigating measures. Larry Henderson stated that the City Council would receive all copies of the previous staff reports and the Historic Preservation Co mission's recommendation to the Planning Commfssioa. Arlene Banks stated that this item would first go before the Planning Commission. HPC MINUTES .S_ JULY 7, 2908 „ 'r Acting Chairman Banks n- opened the public hearing. Nearing noone, Acting Chairman Banks closed the public hearing. Commissioner Cooper moved to recommend designation of 7980 Vineyard, the as ea no taCetl staff's additionalecommndtionst the Plnning Commission. �isst ne Stm secon dad the motion. The motion carried by the following vote; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CDDPER, STAM, ARNER, SAWS, HMvlTZ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, SCHMIDT * *It*** F. Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Acting Chairman Banks opened the public John Liao, owner of the property, stated initial review. He stated ne Is still i he trorked with the architect to incorp i stated he will suffer a bfg loss with e! will be compensation for his loss. Victor Palos, architect with Inlan Dest1 that it was unfortunate his clien was nc before he purchased the land and submitte stated the density cannot be ca imized wN He stated that a better design could be d will become an economic hands ip trying t existing house. -- carried have Presented the plan for n to the designation, but se into the design. He He questioned if there architect for this project, stated aware of the possible designation the first site plan for review. He the house left an the property. e without the house. He stated it incorporate detailings from the Acting Chairman Panks clos d the public hearing. Larry Henderson stated t in response to W. Limo's question, the City ham no mechanism for financ 1 compensation to the developer. Brad Buller, City Pla er, stated that the majority of developments with a maximum of 14 dwelitn units per acre usually get about 10 -11 dwelling units per act,,, which is a out 75S maximum density. Acting Chairman Ba s stated she would like to see the four units in front of the house be move for better visibility. HPC MINUTES -6. JULY 7, 2988 i' t• t, 3 O RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION Or THE THOMAS HOUSE LOCATED AT 7980 VINEYARD AS A LANDMARK WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission hat held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark Designation and issued Resolution No. 88- recommending to this City Cokuv:il that said Landmark Designation be approve WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input from the Historic Preservation Comuission regarding said Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW. THEREFORE, the Ranclko Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I• The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel Nw,1er - 02 -09. SECTION II: The proposed landmark meets the following criteria establishe n e ap r 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cede: A. distorical and cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark was connected with an important family. 4. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an establish and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and city (Ordinance 70 S9, 1979) SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Sect on 7•L`:y x- 4�,i`.J'. 1:.`,�G.• 1ti.:' - .i""r•;. :Svz :�^.9W: s';u` "e, „N` tCITY:,000NCIL9RESOLUTION'° Y August017,'1988- T --lk` n �' Page 2 -• SECTION IY: Based on,the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this Gouncil and based on the findings set forth above, NON. THEREFORE, eE IT-RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucmmonga,City Council door hereby approve designation of The Thomas House as a landmark, r a 1' ..a �3 i t, n qJ t 7c,.. ARCHAEOLOGICAL INFORMATIoN CENTs71 ARCHAEOLOGICAL San Barriatmno Cary Muuum INVENTORY 2024 Orangs Tree Lane ' a RWhnds. CaklorNa 92374 1714) 7924497 FOR THE C ARO(AEMOSICAL RE6OLNLE REVIEW Planning Nusbsrst y p a 'A PLANNING OEPARTIENT Archaeolonical Rssmirces (contact the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission for Information on historic structures) No prehistoric or historical archaeological resources are known to exist within or adjacent to the project area. X Archaeological resources w- wnew.b�Ystt X Within the project area. Adjacent to the project area. aR,srr Ara )I SLeatans 4S ,Y/ ryS ueRtsf �Nfroe,rf M4y No previous surveys for archaeological resources have been conducted of the project area. Previous field surveys for archaeological resources have been conducted aft The entire project area. A portion of the project area. A portion of tho area adjacent to the project area. For purposes of resource inventory, evaluat,t:n of pits significance and evaluation of site integrity, previous reports of archaeological resources within the project area appear to bat Comments, Adequate. Inadequate. Planning Numberst (M E2.1enllal for the+ Pnaenee of Ar�hueloofcel Res.^.uru■ r Based upon available Information. the potential for the presence of arthaeological resources within the project area Ist Law _ Moderate _ High %�. Unknown Commentst listaraa16 ju►eews QJ w 7V& C3.ssv.e .e T.m lr�.a.awr 9tsGtt�121aG1 :relative to CEGA guidelines) u Archaeological resource detersinatlont Negative declaration is recommended. Negative declaration with mitigation measures for archaeological resources Is recommended (see below). An environmental Impact review Is recommended to establish resource significance and Integrity of known resources and /or resources identified from a field survey# and to propose appropriate mitigation measures (sag below). X A field reconnaissancelow -1 for archaeological resources: Is recommended (see Referral List of Archaeological Consultants). Is not recommended. Lt. Prior to Initiation of a field survey, a records check for previously reported archaeological resources and /or cultural reports on file at the San Bernardino County Archaeological information Contort X Is recommended (see Information Center Announcement). Is not recommended, due to the lack of information. The submission of a archaeological resource management report is rectlmenoep tags Guidelines for Cultural Resource Management Reports$ tot _UL. Document the field reconnaissance /ate. W Evaluate resource significance and integrity of known resources and /or resources identified from a field survey. Propose additional investigations if requirods evaluate project Impacts. and propose measures to mitigate potential adverse effects. Comments: . A Late as sa C ter Ctlortl lnator r S x 7 /55 °/d 10w (C � Q �,g �J"'J' � ^'�5' w G� - • I��rfiS t� ..� wt 7 '•"Ilr)•`\4'hu •'a.;'��J-j 7 -• '_.��— �.- ^'a- =.,L._ j•. lS GO •� • ' •ann Ram //v• , A• ♦.6• ,, 7�.7 Ic. 4 .K' /fir •,•'w'' /t ..71 1- \ •�^1 ' • � ongaiVreerp .�5 •Trader .:...;: �....• t •• M.Stprlcal Undm rk) J f# Pat " Na • ' r P • �OOIMILL --- --------aa.. • �� fi • \ e y i.•• { Jo IY73 Jar a i t . • 4 . �• I 1 A�. • • Cucamonga Sch ors. % r r r❑ �Cj '� ,70 •- 'Ra• Tpwers - '- / (KA$K)• '•y" arm •.,.,i �. sr •+', �� -'�'' i". rnth:Dq AdvenUSil ri' , ••' Keh !i• ' � •S �1 FEEDER RECOMMENDED ARCHNEOLOGICAL RE IRCE'SCOPE OF UORG Planning tHumFOR THE DEPARTMENT OF RANCHO CUCAMMM PLANNING DEPART Archival Revlaw X Conduct a records check at the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center. Contact the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission for information an standing historic structures. X Conduct an archival search for information on historical archaeological resources. Pertinent records might Include original General Lana Office plats and surveyors' fieldnotes on file at the County of San Bernardino Office of Surveyor, and property ownership records on file with the County of San Bernardino Assessor and the Bureau of Land Management, Riverside office. Fitld Recornatuar,ee /Burvmv an,A R - e Evaluation %K Conduct a cursory surface examination of the project area to ascertain whether or not archaeological resources may exist. If remains are located, Conduct a complete field survey (see below). Conduct a Complete field survey for prehistoric and historical archaeological resources older than 100 years in age. If resources are encountered, evaluate thts for their significance, and the depth, lateral extent and integrity of cultural remains, as appropr ',ate (see below). For all resources Identified, complete appropriate California Office of Historic Preservation site and isolate retard forms. Prior to the completion of the survey report, submit two copies of completed recortls to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for assignment of appropriate County and State record numbers. These numbers should appear In the final report. K Resources previously reported (and now resources) need to be evaluated for significance, following appropriate state and federal regulations and guidelines. K For significant archaeological resources, probe. core or auger deposits to document their depth, lateral extent and integrity. Archaeological Rall'urc, R -ort x Camelete a final report Of the inveattgations and evaluations performed (following enclosed Guidelines for Cultural Resource Management Reports(. One copy of this report is to be filed with the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center. Center Coordinator Date San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center M. | | � | \�| ! |� � jail !!� | \I ! ;d! jai �� §! : } ! |� . � ■ [. § | ■.-,. ! '; ! ;!� |! § \! q� | /\`! /� §| } j \ §�� \ ! lof Ri to !Ii �* / § §§ d | 21 j. 2 -!- ! ;r 3.1 !,!|, It i \ 9 \ §fA 6 h, ..� =l= |t! ||| a!# %�, } � � ■ | ! ! | ! ! ;d! jai �� §! : } ! |� . � ■ [. § | ■.-,. ! '; ! ;!� |! § \! q� | /\`! /� §| } j \ §�� \ ! lof Ri to !Ii �* / § §§ d | 21 j. 2 -!- ! ;r 3.1 !,!|, It i \ 9 \ §fA 6 h, ..� =l= |t! ||| a!# %�, } � � ■ A i /, I �• , _. . � /l |! �/| ) /!�/ A \!§! �j ■: ,�• QJ| \/. &� �� ~ 2& ■ ;! \�\ - - � \ �\ , � ` �' • � �| ` q §) . �� % O A i /, I �• , _. . � /l |! �/| ) /!�/ A \!§! �j ■: ,�• QJ| \/. &� �� ~ 2& ■ § | � � t, § |\ \ §; | /!! , !ix— R& lji3! § \! - t5 §2�• .S! � its |} i .- f aE, � a . ■U| § | � � t, § |\ \ §; | /!! , !ix— R& lji3! § \! - t5 §2�• .S! 1 CALIFORNIA t' ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY ARCHAEOLOGICAL INFORMATION CENTER Son B&n&dslo County Museum 2024 Orange Thee Lane Redlands- CMWOrnla 02374 (714)702.1407 AtY1GUNCEMQtT - The Center hous0$ historical and archaeological site records; National Register of Historic Places property records; State landmark, structures and points of inte historic rest recordsl isolated artifact and pending site recordst and cultural recource reports for the County of San Bernardino, Additional files includes historic maps, atrial photographic Indexes, and bibl- iographies of historic and scientific works pertaining to the cultural history of the County, The Center is staffed week days, with hours devoted to professional inquiries between StOO -12:00 AM and 1:00 -4i00 PM Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. Fees for record searches Include: Cultural Resource Management[ Searches (by Center staff) 690.00 /hour Self- searches (by qualified $90.00 /first hour and professicnals only) $45.00 /each subsequent hour Planning Review (by Center staff) s 5.00 /request Student and Indentndent Fesearch: Searches (by Center staff) $90.00 /hour Self- searcnas 610.00 /request PhotCCOPytng Charges: $0 23/page (original records may not be remove0 from the Can Overnight Mailiwgst Billed at cost to the Center jr Charged to your FedEx account All requests for searcheo must be made in writing or in person. Telephone requests from recognized professionals and CM agencies can be made to initiate record searches by Center staff, but information will not be mailed until a written request and a signed agreement form are received. Site locations will be released only to professionals who have filed A signed rgreement Of Confidentiality form and who hale prQVtCad a career statement, detailing academic and professional qualifications. Students and avccational archaeologlcts must file a latter from a supervising archaeologist stating the goal of tre:r research, their expected product and the individuals 1r Olved in the research. Far :luthe ro ct tc n ;a comply with State requirements and Center procecures are grounds fil of attest to cultural resource files. For further information, cortact: Lester Ross, Center Coordinator, I ■ FOR: RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL PRE - AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Agenda of: Augdst 17. 1988 Redevelopeent Agenda o.. LOCATION ON AGENDA: (check one) Anncuncnents Consent Calendar Advertised Public Hearings w /afdt � u-1L CJ nance 1st read 2nd read Cont tbn- Advertised u3Tic Hearingi w /ordinance 1st read 2nd read Cont X City IYnager_s —Staff Rapari- City Attorney's Staff Reports Council Business REPORT TITLE: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE 1T�� PERSON GIVING REPORT AT MEETING Arlene Banks SOWARY EXPLANATION: (As it should appear on the public agenda) ATTACHMENTS TO STAFF REPORT X Resolution Ordinance Contract minutes Plan/map _Dther (specfryT Bonds Oral ReprE- RESOLUTION /ORDINANCE TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE, 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE AS A LANDMARK RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Coeraission recommends designation oOFT a TFo—w -rouse as a Landmark. _.i 1 I E A 7 z I , / WMY11l / / I � L1I 7 i 2� E 04 epF F rd j3 III u COMES OFFICE BUILOIA! 1} uaen c9earrcti "WORM 443 r CWMjL nL WU^ tL ro 3 j, i t .L_ 3A , i t M�A1 : IRLYY ofn ,moo Z 1 7 413 R CINMAL Afl, NPLAW Cl I i� 4' J Er- i fi �� I 412 n mica JVL mluq CL t CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY ARCHAEOLOGICAL INFORMATION CENTER San BetnarCkw County Museum 2024 Orange Trap Lane Retlluftls. Cafdorma 92374 (714) 792.1497 ii ' EItut I• }1V P (invited for all reports) — +�ii°i"art title shield he cle led off the tyyffa of )avast) atloo, J'aJKL MM, IKa110i, Craft sod state (41.1, Cultural Iteourca Surny of the IlOefield Novo no be" spent hoptct, leer WIIry tru, 1. aihorii); °r et:fttteeypg'fire �u "teeieu. C. pate (loath and ter! d. Contracting Imtltuilu, agency, or developer fandil� In"Mgatlon. e. Contract mCnr aid fkaralt alexy plrelt "unbar (11 applic III. ll. of I., (required only If a report it large 111410111 to warrant) a. eat a valor sectmns. hitting$ and Appeedlcss, with page oueberl. 1. Litt of fl Or", with page meat. C. List of tallest with pale a0nbart• III• Xan o11 6 a (r bred for all reports, -.enlisting of ore to fire Palo$ intended for the on of neA-pre evaaeva st to he written in clear, teethe language). a. Porpose 111 step of Investigation. i. Constraints intthe Investigat conducted le q.Y gob flnanto$, Ieglsllcst agotatlen, wealhar, landowner oeraisolon, etc.) d. Suety of reseurcol Identified. e, Slgolfltime of resources (related to clitoris of California Cnvlrenu"tal aa11lty Act ICEgA3 AD ePdle C Coed the X1116111 Historic Prtetratlon Act 1WAI 311 CFX d0, a Dualiprahl. I. Potential adverse effects of Project 11 significant resource. q. Re oatnilations. tV, sou Coen ul (required bed&Pfllci0li to I glanljreli tit be relative in the'Cap@ And fill of the FtOJat, a. Coetncttnq tnttltatIon, contract Robot, pewit maker (erpiratlon doll), ether appropriate agency- IcifiC i"foreotlon and federal undies. b. 6fographfcal lefts of Creject are& a acres lest Ilaear projects, length and width of survi areal. c. Description of ccrepoed 7�reject, nature and Wall of Ironed disturbance anticipated, and Or of d. tittr,ftly# ut,tryetf %byl this study was Wtrt;he!; atinga area and . list@ ioi federa law,) Coat o of Irarleus stables, If Inyt that preceded or ruo"uaded the pretest effort. e. Ones el Imo$vious studios, f. York orginitation and list of the active particfpne Ind their duties tststeunts of Ieliflntlo "t to be provided in an Isreadla. If portius of toe study stn revived, lilt Ike reviewers (review letters a It Droaded to an Ippeetlu. hl. Project lout) nitip otoofstfaaqq if )Photocopies of °relevant portlem of appropriate US6S quadrangles clearly doculenting the project boundaries. Indicate the project Pest, qua vault gold sue, Iownh'P /ta"ge and sections eA ea ce7oy. 1. Prepet lfpaa up Consisting of I phMerty of the project location map fee Ablve) Indiullnq erut of potsetlil tnvara rental lepict IAFIII, kotb direct and indirect ispacts wllhln and adj'Co$t to the Ireject area. If desired, Conclude at an apparAlr, cople of pllulag ups used to conduct Ibis ,tidy. V. n. 1.,a111� (rryelrNppfppor all lmntlgatlena, hot to It tape brief for small-scale projects) 1. Brief adeorrl tl s of the iaiarimrlrenooalmefthe gowal liriillrclnlinge� "gltalleb dnlmapm Me say, lot 1, W tit location of culturally Imparo11t resources tut ms cryYloo, drain,, c. grief f U7ietin of curro t IW off il'g., used for agriculture, alai rNlNmtkh ek.l. y, recrmallae, urlar„ m. 11,=: mf tb1 turNt Cemdtlies of the proper within the project are, U.Y., relatively nwdified, partially dlstonN IY e,ntrutin efrcoltural fma n lu, etc.). Vt. C +Istlm_Data d ut.r.ee.. m. -,...- ... _. b. You net r. ....... erence 10 uNUhe nt rut al ,,revlded. far inv investigation wlllmoet nlaW a records search, one C- If OtlnirU)ulerommerat rte ComectN nfmroecn b us tinp" of dominate coesolted areAa brief Onladdresses ftt rawits nocludiotopies Of record "arch" "saluted my any archival institution to so gpledit). VII. UdMI N gg carer... lnplrw for all lonstilatien battle Is kept brief for 11111 -Stall projectsl rgnson aos a nvn hlo`:ef roar emal @,OS and plus prior {a toltUtleneof the 1 " "tigalln) iAS parpeu of tAls stoternt 1" - to em Ids th1 ntUsele bobtail the decsentaltn effortl - to dellel 111 ups of the InnitigatLiq - is Identify N1 methods, tWblpslf sot oncedurN maslnl to oil I trevi ri to ldontlfy someone get eddronn within tell livestlootton. The It H prew love Y fernlatod research dniges are encouraged, a/ long e, they are cwrnat and 114th dlncUY to the project aeaer consideration. C. fart. years in age, etc.). fellow the definition provided by the California Office of dificitins In CM dae,ndi, c t.aa.. u.- .. _____. _ Outline of the methods You than to npl o11 such A ewrfeirihY q,Irilng ao llan0 of suunc# i pofir the reasons for Tour assessment. type. gaontltY, location and probable 'JIII. maN s m for a n. n (rmquired for all invntigitlonsg I,ytA rdalln to the scope and 11cm o 1 eons iqa ten A. Historical "tUft. providing details such as, pAstltotionl and Indiridwlt contutel, naewrcre ales): U.q ,map flln, government publte,tians, etc,), rofenn"s used kite U beferenns Cited bdawh cite the main of institutions and individuals conti. -ted, donating the bks RICO contacts wero • sect (Copies of Orel tsouieshronoelteedltitInate be provided get the Itferencli tiled _ sect!the p If lecattordcoat" and cltes themcoeplmtedtitle,mcartegrophmr or ,aaptoq aglM► with dattolncnctron • Cite appropriate stulrihthat found. overview of the reliant and if Mainly for later dascus11ons of results and recomamedma tons, provide a brief summary If reAnat subject litters. 2 I II. If sgllq strategies wrr created so tan Malt of these starches, then list And dhrnf the research ""tON that we deselopel, IN outline the strategies ceesidpred, relKtN And Accepted. 1. Arthaesloglnl cathgl nrlllag details such ate cap of %array tre$sKt %t dP,&yo n! of firvey perseaeN, else rKordattes techniques, chwlc1l analysed, subsurface tat Wattles and fluidal rotate /N{Itg tetlalloN, etc. IdaNecr11etPew of resefrth Ind uy1151 stratsglsf "Played, Indlesti51 Iw they we lepleweted else, 9eruntigrd /dry{ wre el/eMN. Rapped IKa leg of the was filling In the field, depicted es =9 pl/rogiN. OeecrlptlI tturary of Ue areas fialwd, briefly noting a11t Ind We certain ryKI area erce w! IRpectN 4 [ebtl"nfAl) b the 56801151 strategies "Played, IM wtP51 the Pore Edge of lrwnd rise ►Illty ter the cress IePKled. f mIto 11 w ar,&l v, rprvN frw the project Ilse, lbw descrlbfi •a/' It ws :t Mat w% cell eNr I Ni! re(RIKe tnYR - utN1191 augers and records tire ereatg, and Mat rPe$its HIS tee aterlal and record{ ttarstarill AgrpeNlt# to to provided In In gqlendlp. • If pha rPhs or rusts wealee data esre « setts, then provide prlats fled data either in the all Ill uy IiriaotW n1 reside appro /rlate ntrrtaxi anshersrsite to Ill and Copies of this data at too [M�atltoryl. If S%bsvfece tests Will condorttd, %hit describe this types of tests fyleyell, reTIMACe awberf es$tloed is path fast lecstlol Ind • aPIN l6cattees of w:h test. Parse UIRM Ulta`IfIN (Invited for all larestieaaawa seta roE, rworcas wre prrvliorl'Y regards or istic lattei and baiareteat llocated, Use discuss Ill possible ervlruuNsel And cultural factors that ea Ian biddn or dastroyed the Cassettes. If pastelist historic fits locations tire found an hislarlt lips, ill set legates In the (Meld, t11f pride ptatace IN of relevant Persians of err historic s dPICt151 these panther field. h. ucernap e r o en ca a1orlei 11 al9lte of inrrldWR,iarccealdtaetal Igo, clnalflN I. Nls erlcal nurccei, n ,&llrr le the lealnitlonpprerlded in %Kills 11114 4Nalmttla., standing historical properties alder clan 100 years 10 ego, stlndlsg historical properties elder tAaa 30 ywrs to a�at or staging historical properties yeanler than 30 year in agar IN of It thanal IsportaKe !t. InOitrijI resouurcces 11101.1, 1a14l9r4ic1 arletsuid& ercos), filing, lolhRlog, etc.), and cI. E51101e1151 reseerces 11 Orttvl Aydraollc wrls. rates, tic.). 2. Archawlep(cal resources (6e., pritarlly surface Ind subsurface prapartles) ). ProAIstlric still, hl. Prehistoric /historic $Sill 3. Mae rts011tettrlrilarisearces (e.g., Isolated Artifact scatter$, 156lahe altos or urlrcl etc.) A. It 181sd prNitterlcal reswess Il.e.r Isolatg artificial. S. NO'historical- Heave resources (099., IOWA foods, otlr line#, structural, etc., [. r n of * crept. Prorlee a description oP each resource listed an lMe 'Cultural taourus grew e. • Poi each bitter so ressattes, Collett one copy of the California Historical Resource Inventory fora And Appose to a coefldeatlilaNisterlcal Refearcls A7paNlc. For seth archseologlcll r lourcy cogent% one toFy of t[�I California Archaeological Inventory, ten end a pose ,& a confident l Archaeological Rl""Cli appendlt. Prior to cospirtlon of the roped moat in copies of Each fort to lot Sin lereardlas County Arthafologlcal Inforwtlea For le re0ae %flag S ,&se tr,nef ,&l Authors for pith alto. for 56th Ilobad llstorlcal /77r historical resource teapltt# ono copy of the California Arch a"1091 Isolated Artlfau_ fare Ile append In a confident,,, Ialat•e d......... ........ report. ••.•.•u..neasa only appear In confidential app,,4ICgi, net In !bi iiln IF of !M d, ",q ft n e a r r I r Pterlee o statement Iedrati51 the elgnifluxe of teal Woods' oasup fn a enu 1 ..urce folleelnq the Crites,& far waludtieA ,Played to CF9A AD ,seer K or KNPA 36 CPR 60, Ise appropriate. e n a Is also pr I ategn IY a for original fabric off t&I resournrle ,l9uasuretr,ocrvstdructure n ,&as appraaaease AS[ pl aclglwl fabric dating it Its Initial tons tittles, go &( p( altar appear% vI "turbid, etc.). 3 r ' °,- i'""``2i',�r' �• �•'kJ��Ne F..C+.+.`L,w.`e ._ i,`�� -�,'.3 i.f�a'y!'"G. I. .Fwlutlu N x1w-,L-U— *u u Irg11red for.all lan+tl +Item r m!1 too nuK+,f collwal r �,. rre"arces g p M D It laMlu -hru 11 +'trail.uenlrolepal and historical nuarcm drovidly am at Jac fellniq y lution lbp.11�Ied;lalal; atilt and fadenl "I+tatie■s al state the ntta"le far msa M r It -. v vK , iectA Effects I such al destrectlea, +it+rallea fulatles, de., and Indirect Adverse Effec %, Sick as growth fK!liallN, IKrNIro AWIIG e1q KIIIa 11 f "ndrc" Nialit If A" act area, etc. II. Nae,aN Altlmstl "i it N+.ra: Fffecti fir ...4 for all lar,ttl°aticas r4m la AA en u t arose A Ka to nitmat rtroma11 +. In turlu form,* Iltt ill ArmsaroI its AM IIsarlal retawe" that rosld be adverse]( effected, [etaprlu IMIr al1■IftaKa and Nrcetgr If ml INl furlellatryrltp AM "likes NI adr1r11 - Affect eultbaN 91 a salt of u1 co is of AnKt: 1. For aacA rroAmis It at l0 11 dgalft[nl. vltl a r i itrtly MIR percentage of original Flail cf�ahprI , aM flr,r►Irl a Nvtne effect Is uI I atN, rK11/"d a range If p"ti11e Utlaat a warma llNlatlqq yNC ArlaraKa alts ul - °TUOlutlen M tM Aro1ec[I — Afurab r I I and redallle If -SRI" N 11 of tat rrolectt AK reclittanmaN`uta fK /r`rrNf °( I Or ef`GeI led fltAmecat +M` "I and ties Af rlwarcal a itAta APaarlc Wdautt sr FKKaI ptleul Ae�laty of Alsarlc Itaat 41etN/E1111111 hgntIt IIstrlcts LAnlutIs ($ride pp$pr its r of Misa fun In u pplWlr ateytr a cafldatcal append silt Ill., FIAII AKe,rM,tlt" Irrdred for all Ionsllpetle") a. fI. he to b off Ktlorrnet "T "Al affect, and fwtllr rKaNNAaaOa rtpmired far [Bltm/l Villareal, 2. gets lmplwntatlol if Htlgalln "aslr" as a aNltlal of A$ject Approval, or 1. Arl firirpro`I+NIO °riv r naeirtlilist effects aiiy alenNgresfid to previous section. fill. ANmemn Ireplrk for all rpefIll Mathes should folly ferut gelldion for °infra Anticoltrl fly. pd °e 1+-6 it tied for all reports) 1. criminal cA eultllrpA, r Slar Results f peared by eon. project parueNll c. Repository Agreements (If aye 1. Aevl"ers Cementite elf any) IV. Y,."r,`.,a tlrtx�o�rI trcunti'91" cin w!K�,tlentnro +/nt1i1`iappjiMla aallrinveltigations iyi aaNld Nt 11 lrcicd,d vital* cost" oe rports fir Initial distrlaatlto) a. Historical and Arcn"lalial Anearce utatlon IAA A. Atumce Inventory AKerea • Nis l Anmsrcta nap +nd Ievaltory Feral Xislorlcal Vnama/ Ap • hllforaI XI rta Rouurcat Investor(] Fora • ArNUOla it I ISO -.1 Aas and I.Vista ry Font • Arcaualogic ilIL cgs N Gllforn a ArtharoI iul Sete gn,ntory Fent • Ito[ to or Is Asp a levutory av et Callfote1 11o1i led ktiaet Font C. Nufl+gl Ao/aaIli fora an attached Maples of ucpted forms) T. C11, orals Ntsterlsat ►etoti If Interest fern t. national Register of Nlsterte Rlstrlctelsndurt forts x_ p,w This Planning Commission Resolution is part of'Item ES RESOLUTION NG. 88 -144 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCN4oNGA PLANNING CO'R4ISSION DENYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88 -15, LOCATED AT THE HCRTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ADCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT - APR: 208 - 811 -58 A. Recitals. of Development Review Hoer 68-15 has asfidescribed application for title approval Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as 'the application'. (ii) On the 27th of July, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on July 27, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of 90 feet and lot depth of 180 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a non - conforming Single Family Residence, the property to the south of that site consists of an Industrial Park, the property to the cast is a Single Family Residential tract, and the property to the west is a gas station; and (c) The application has an associated Variance request. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the propos d ,.,,ject is not consistent with the objectis v 'of the General Plan; and OR 88 -15 - Design,_C6operative v , July 27, 1988 Page 2 ., (b) That the proposed use is not in accord with the objective Of� the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site 1; located; and (c) That the,proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; end (d) That the proposal use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. a 5. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the 4 adoption of this Resolution. :i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1988. pimNG C ISSION OF RE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONDA /1 h.. _1 , n I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Reatho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY MDES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE XMIT: COMMISSIONERS: E11RICK, TOLSTOY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS NwHIEL t Septemher 7, 1988 Dear Councilperson, With regards to a historic designation on the property I own at the corner of San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenue.... To the best of my knowledge no one from the City Planning Department or Historical Commission has indicated to me that the structure has any architectural significance whatsoever. Everyone who I have talked with.., and all reports from the City Planning Commission and Historic Preservation meetings indicate that the structure is "modest in means" and has little or no architectural significance or design. The only reason I have been told for making this a tistorical site ...... is strictly because the property was o:,ce owned by the "Thomas'. In the beginning the commission wanted me to donate the building to the City, pay to have it removed from the site and placed on another site. Also, there was some talk about having the building moved across the street to the Thomas Winery Project. The project manager of that development had his construction people look at the building and see if it could be moved. I had a contractor look at the site and both contractors have agreed that the building is not able to be moved at any reasonable cost and is not worth saving. At a previous Planning Commission meeting I believe the minutes will indicate their feelings are the same as mine about saving this building. If you decide to designate this building a Historic Site I have two questions= 1. on what grounds would you designate this building a Historic Site? If it is for the sole reason because it was once owned by the Thomas'. ..does this mean that all properties once owned by the Thomas' in the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be designated as Historical Sitns? 2. If you decide to designate it a Historic Site, what requirements and costs are you asking of me? If the City wishes to take measurements and pictures of the property I do not have any problems with that. At the previous Planning Commission meeting they felt, as I do, if measurements and pictures were being requested to document the property.... that responsibility should be taken over by the Planning i Historic staff, and not be the responsibility of the owner. I have asked Planning staff and the Planning Commissioners what do they want if this site is designated as a Historic Site? To date, no one has been able to give me a straight answer to my question, nor do they have any guidelines to go by. In addition; 1,, �lieve tho Planning Commission minutes will require me to do the following if you dosignate this site as„a ' Historic Sites 1. I Will `have"to produce a " guarantee" to someone (again, no guidelines or. specifiss) that;i am financially capable of securing a construction la8g fot'the development prior to•the issuances of eny'building peimlts being ,issued. I do take exception of having,tc,•supply the city with "guarantees" before I pull a permit, what you do mean by "guarantee"? 2. I will .'gave to conduct a "archeology" study on the property. No one has been able to explain to me•exaatly what will be required. why hasn't anyone else ever in the history of.,Rancho Cucamonga been required to- conduct such a study? I've asked this samo question of staff.... and the only answer I get is that a now commission (policy) Jas beon.established to do this. If this is ` so, why has it taken since 1979 to enforce the ordinance on my particular project? Why have other projects, in the same, area not been required to conduct such a survoy7 I appreciate your consideration regarding this matter. S2rdR. Co mba/,l /•Vr'orw•.rrtt1,y Owner 8010 Vineyard Avenue Rancho Cucamonga n c` ,J. e r � �.�2:•. I _ _. aFJR ��e•rt