HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/10/19 - Agenda PacketY
J
r
CI'T'Y
COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:30 p.m.
October 19, 1988
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamon8a
City Councilmembers
Dennis L. Stout, srarY•
Pamela J. Wright, m- o•PoT-
Deborah N Brown, co.,ran.�+sr•
Charles J. Buquet, aoul/munbr•
Jeffrey King, co..rn.•.e..
Lauren M. Wasserman, crrt .sre +ou•
James Markman, Gy Anw Y
Beverly A. Authelet, cily er.•e
City Mr.. 989.1851
Dons Put 980.3145
�y4
�.Y
. S{
,
City Council Agenda
d' e'�4�3, October 19, 1988
PAGE '
1
All items submitted for the City Cowaeil Agenda rut be in
writing. The, deadline for submitting th4ise items is 5:00
p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City
Clark's O -face receives all such items.
A. CAIJ. TO ORDP.R
1. Pledge of Allegiance to Ptac.
2. Roll Call: Brown ,_, Buqu4t _�, Stout __,
Ring _, and Wright ^.
A. AitOUC1.HRM/P114111fATIOiS
1. Presentation of ten year pins to Dennis L. Stout, Mayor,
and Charles J. Buquet, Councilman.
2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Mark Lorimar for big
hard work and service while employed by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
C. CONSIST CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and mn- coutrwarsial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one Liam without dincusai Any item may be
removed by a Coutwilmember or umber of the audioace for
discussion.
1. Approval of Warrants, Register Mos. 10/5/88 and
1
10112/88, and Payroll ending 9/29/88 for the total
amount of $114110252.37.
2. Approval to authorize the assignment of an adult
10
crossing guard to the corner Church Street and Center
Street for Dona Merced Elementary School.
3. Approval to authorize tb3 assignment of an adult
12
crossing guard to the corner of Hermosa Avenue and Peron
Boulevard for Cucamonga Elementary School.
4 Approval to annex a portion of the San Bernardino County
14
unincorporated area located north of Highland Avenue,
south of tFe logical extensim to Summit Avenue, east of
the Day Creek utility corridor, and vest of the
County /City boundary - APM 225- 161 -19, 329 33, 349 35,
36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, and 61.
PAGE
City Council Agenda
//A,/�n- Cetober 19, 1988 2
d
RESOLUTION NO. 88-611
16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ANNESATION 88-01, ORDERING
TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS THE AREA
GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND
AVENU3, SOUTH OF THE LOGICAL EXTENSION TO
SMUT AVENUR, EAST OF THE DAY CREEK
UTILITY CORRIDOR, ANr WEST OF THE
COUNTY /CITY BOUNDARY, ANNEXED TO THE CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MARE FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
5. Approval to purctsee a John Dear Model 510
25
Backboe /Loader from Whitney Machinery, Ins. of
Riversido, :n the amount of $64,525.38 to be funded by
I.C.S. Account 72 -4W -7045.
6. Approval to reclassify the Resource Service Department's
27
Senior Office Assistant to Administrative Analyst, to be
funded from Account No. 33 -4130 -1100.
7. Approval to award the "Street Light Inventory° project
28
to BSI Consultants, Inc. in thu amouit of $14,780
0131436 plus LOT contingency) to be funded as follows:
Lighting District it - 55,4130 -6028 $4,172.00
Lighting District /2 - 56,4130 -6026 $4,565.60
Lighting District }3 - 57 -4130 -6028 $3,910.40
Lighting District 14 - 58.4130 -6028 $1,788.80
Lighting District i5 - 59 -4130 -6028 $ 343.10
S. Approval of the encumbrances from FY 87/88 and
30
Appropriate the foods to the account as outlined in the
1
report.
9. Approval to authorize an appropriation from the
37
available fond balance of the Central and ICS Funds for
the purchase of a 1987 Ford Tempo CL from the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
10 Approval to avard the vehicle purchase to Dieterich
38
International TrucV Sales, Inc. of Colton in the amount
of $29,773.36 for the purchase of one 1400 Metro Van II
to be funded from account camber 01- 4647 -7045 and I.C.S.
d
1
s
City Council Agenda
October 19, :988
PAGE
11. Approval to award the vehicle purchase to Enterprise
41 :
Chevrolet of Upland in the amount of $66,454.80 for the
purchase of oue,Utility Mini -Van, one 7 rassenger Mini-
Van, me Coepact 4 Wheal Drive Utility Vehicle, one
Compact 2 Wheel Drive Vehicle, and one itid -Sire Extended
Cap Pick -up to be funded from various accounts.
12. Approval to award the vehicle purchase to Colley Auto
44
Cara, Inc. of Glendora in the amount of $38,163.18 for
the purchase of 2 3/4 ton Pick-ups with modifications to
be funded from account numbers 01- 4647 -7045 and
13. Approval to execute Contract Change Order: No. 5 (CO 87-
47
20) for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Creek
and Associates to continue design administration and
review of plans vitb specifications for the following
projects& 19th Street Nest City Limits for $18,000
(Account No. 22- 4637. 3743), Sernosa /Csrtilla for $16,000
(Account No. 22- 4637 - 8744), $17,000 for Zircon /Amotbyst
(Account No. 22 -4637- 8746), $2,000 for Banyan Street
Extension (Account No. 22- 4637 - 8739), and $8,000 for
Arrow Bridge Widening (Account No. 22- 4637 - 8738). She
total amount of this Change Order is $68,000 to bring
the contract total to $113,000 to be paid from the
Systems Development Funds.
14. Approval to execute Reimbursement and Service Agreesents
48
(CO 98 -170) for the Proposed Assessment District 89 -1
(Lewis Names) to be funded from Account No. 70- 276-483.
15. Approval to execute Professional Services Agreement (00
65
85 -171) with J.P. Davidson for the Master Plan
Beautification Study for Seven Avenue and Base Line
Road, to be funded by Beautification Funds in the amount
of $42,000 as follwss $16,000 from Account No. 21-
4647 -8047 (Base Line Road), and $26,000 from Account No.
21 -4667 -8724 ( Seven Avenue.
16 Approval to execute contract (00 85 -172) for the City
66
Corporation Yard Phase I, Base Bid "A" including
Alternate 4 deduction project, located at 9153 Ninth
Street, awarded to Lucky Construction Company for the
amount of $2,200,000 ($2,098,000 plus 5Z contingency) to
be funded from Capital Reserve, Account No. 25 -4285-
7043
i,
01M city rAUncil A October 19, 1988
PAGE .„
4 +
de
Yy
A
17. Approval to execute contract (OD 88 -173) for the Ninth
67 {
Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project between
Vineyard Avenue and Baker Avewe awarded to Gentry
e%
Brothers, Inc._ for the amount of $120,330 ($109,388.65
plus 101 contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax Fund
Account No. 09 -4637- 8815.
'
18. Approval of an Agreement (GO 88 -174) with the County of
68 {'
San Bernardino for need abatement services.
19. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -175) for the design
76 +
of the Red Hill Park Lake and Amphitheater Drainage
Improvements to Linville ZivLl Engineer /Land Surveyors,
'
Ioc. for the amount of $16,200 ($14,800 plus , 103
contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve fund
Account No. 25 -4265 -7043.
'
20. Approval to execute an Agreement for Postponement of
77
Recordation of Declaration of Restrictions (CO 88 -176)
for Tract 13271, located on the northwest corner of
Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue, submitted by
Levis Development Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-612
78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AN AGES MEET FOR POSTPONEMENT'
OF RECORDATION OF DECLARATION OF
RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT 13271
21. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and
80
Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Parcel Map No.
113410 located on the southeast corner of Church Street
and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Levis Development
Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-613
81
A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11341,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NUMBER 11341),
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
'S
1.
FF-
ji�r
r('
i�
F
E,
PAGE r
City Council Agenda
October 19, 1988 5
RESOLUTION NO. 88-614
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOLYIA,
ORDERIHO THE ANNEXATION OF Cg RTAIH
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE
DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREHT LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR
PARCEL MAP 11314
82
i
22. Approval of Hayst execution of improvement Agreements
88
(t}
and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
;t1
Maintetaaee District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tracts 13748,
tLt.
13857 and 13858, imated at the southeast corner of
t*
Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by M. J.
Brock and Sons.
RESOLUTION 110. 88-615
87
ti
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUIDICII. OF TSB
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFCRNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREEIIENTS.
IIUROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL NAPS OF
TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858
RESOLUTION N0. 88-616
88
A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL 07 THE
CITY CP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT MOS.
13748, 13857 AND 13858
23. Approval of Nap, execution of Inproremant Agreement,
9i
Improvement Securitys and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. I sad 2 for Tract 13728,
located on the northeast cornnr of Sapphire Street and
Hillside Road, submitted by Hillside /Sapphire Venture.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-617
92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCI.MONCA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL NAP OP
TRACT N0. 13728
ly
a
1110-4-1-101
, P
City Council Agenda
October 19� 1988 I 6 6
4
s♦
RESOLUTION NO. 88-618
'93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILL, Of THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORhLk,
ORDERING THE ANFEI:ATION 07 CERTAIN
TERRITORT TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT ENO. 1 AdD SIREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MOO. 1 AND 2 FOR
TRACT 13728
24. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and
99
Imprc7ement Security, and Ordering the Anucaation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Boo. 1 and 4 for Parcel Map 9897,
located on the southeast corner of Church Street and
Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by Levis Development
Company.
RESOLUTION NO. e8-619
98
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTEN
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9897,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 110. 9897),
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 88-620
99
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1'HB
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPI MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR
PARCRL MAP 9897
25. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
102
Tract 13353, located on the northwest corner of 19th
Street and Archibald Avenue, submitted by ALH Limited
Partners.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-621
103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13353
4
s♦
', October 19, 1988
AI „ City Council Agenda
PACE
7
26. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
104
Tract 13542 -1, located on the south side of Nilson
Avenue at Caniatel Avenue, submitted by Grigsby
Development.
RE80LUTIOM NO. 88-622
105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGE KENT EXTENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13542-
1
27. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
106
Tract 13542 -2 Stem Drain, located on the south side of
Nilson Avenue at Canistal Avenue, submitted by Grigsby
Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-623
107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COCNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACFEENENT EXTENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY YOH TRACT 13542-
2 STORM DRAIN
28. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
108
Tract 10414, located on Ridgeviev Avenue north of
Hillside Road, submitted by Greg Lundeen.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-624
109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION
AND IMPROVEIE.TT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10414
29. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
110
Tract 13057, located on the south side of Uighlcud
Avenue betveeo Fairmont Avenue and Deer Creek, submitted
by Fieldstone Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-625
111
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRSMOSHT EXTENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13057
S FI
i♦
"s �•I
PAGE °i�, -',F
' dry; City Council Agenda
AX /010/V
October 19, „988 8
.°
r r
t
Yc
ryY
W
1
Y,
a'
i;
30. Approval to axe: uta Improvement Agreement Extension for 112
Tracts 13022 8eatq 13022 West, 13022 Major Streets,
located on thu vent Bide of Milliken Avagra between
lairmont Avenue and Victoria Perk Lane, submitted by
Willi" Lyon Company.
R890LVI70H N0. 88-626 113
A RESOLUTION of THE cm COUNCIL or THE
CITY OF RANCHO COCANONCA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING INPPDVBNBHS dC8861f8HT B7.T8HSIOtl
AND IltPHOVBNBNI SECURITY ➢OH T8dCI9 13022
HAS3'a 13022 Y83Ti 13022 MAJOR SY8BBT9
31. Approval to execute Improvama¢t Agreement and 114
Improvame¢t Sonority for Parcel Nap 9350 located on the
gvrtboaet corner of Haaa Lice Road and Milliken Aveauer
submitted by The William Lyon Company.
HB90LDTION N0. 88-627 115
A @HSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 3H8
CITY Of RANCHO COCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA,
dPP80➢IHC THE INPHOYBJSNT dC88LNE8T AND
I:4HOVHNBNI SECURITY FOR PARCEL NAP 9350
32. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and 116
Improvemngc Security for Tract 102101 located on the
north aide of Almond Avenue, east of Sapphire Street,
submitted by Nordic Development Company, a General
Partner of Skyline I, Limited and Release of Improvamnnt
Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by City
Council on September 4, 19859 submitted by ➢orcast
Mortgage Company.
88SOLUTION tl0. 88-628 117
A 88SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL or THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCd, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING INP80VSNHNT dCHH8N8NT, AHD
I!4'gOVHMHNI SECURITY FOR TRACT 10210 AND
RELEASING THE INPBDV6N8HT ACBH8N8NI AND
SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACC8kT3D
33. Acrroval to release Faithful Performance Bond and accept 119
•educed bond to replace original for Tract 12642, 12935- '
44 major otreets, located on the ¢eat aide of Milliken
Avenue north of Highland Avenues submitted by Kaufman
and Broad.
t
s
City Council Agenda
October 19, 1988
34. Approval of Ispzrvements, - eleaae of bonds and file a
notice of completion fort
Tract 12621, located on the south side of Arrow Highvnv:
between madronn Avenue and Batter Avemie
Releaeet
Faithful Performance Bond (Strout) 9169,000
ACCeptt
maintenance Guarantee Bond ( Straet) $ 16,900
Rgsolm,j0N N0. 88-629
A RESOLUTION Or INS CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTL90 TBd PUBLIC IMPROVZMEHTB FOR
TRACT 12621 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF
A NOTICE OF tONPIXTION FOR TIM WORK
Dg 81 -01, bested on the nortbeaat corner of Arrow
BtRhwar sad Maple Plece
FaitLful Performance Bond (Street) 9 22,000
RESOLUTION NO. 88430
A RESOLUTION OF TO CITY COUNCIL OF I"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING 1'88 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR
87 -01 ANT) AUTHORIZING THE FIITHG OF A
NOTIm OF COMPLETION FOR TER WORK
7740 Haet Avenue
Faithful Performance Bond (Streit) $ 9,500
RESOLUTION NO. 88-631
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN A,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
7740 EAST AVENIUS AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COICLET104 FOR THE
WORK
PAGE
9
120
121
122
123
124
125
r`"'
PAGE„ 'r�
AA p City Council Agenda
October 19, 1988 10 r!,:
35. Approval to accept inprovanents, release Heintenance
Guarantee Bond fort
Tract 12922, located on the north side of Highland
-
126
Avenue. cut of Haven Avenue
Haintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,000
Tract 11625, heated on Una northwest comer of 19th
127
Street and Deraau Aveaue
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 42,530
Tract 9619, located on the northwest corner of r raaliea
:28
Street and Jasoer Street
Maintenance Cuarantaa Don-1 (Street) $ 81,350
:6. Approval to establish the 5uperviaory /Profee atonal
129
classification of Administrative Aida at the salary
range of $1,888 - 82,423 per mouth (Step 340 - 390).
37. Approval to upgrade Sheriff's Sergeant to
130
Lieutenant /Traffic.
38. Approval to upgrade station clerk position to clerk for
132
records supervisor.
39. Approval to expend funds for citizen patrol vehicle for
Sheriff's Department in thu amount of $6,000.
133
40. Approve. of Proposed Intention to Construct the Jersey
134
Boulevard Storm Drain betveen Utica Street and Red Oak
Avenue vithin Assessment District 52 -1 and the calling
for bids for said storm drain construction.
RESOLUTION NO. E8 -637
136
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA,
CALIFOR9IA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
ORDER CERTAIN CHANCES AND MODIFICATIONS
IN THE YORK IH A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT AND SETTMG PUBLIC HEARING
City Council Agenda
Do tot, 19, 1988 11
- RESOLUTION NO. 88-633
A RESOLUTION OF TEE fZTY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RA11CHO CUCA..XONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REFERENCING PREVAILING' MACE SCALE AND
DIRECTING CALL FOR CONST911CTION SIDS
41. Set public hearing for Novas er 16, 1988 - AN AIKAL OF
TER COSDITIONS OV'APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13138 -
138
140
RCDINe COMPANY - An appeal of five S eo¢ditio¢s of
approval pertaininU to utility undorgreunding, street
dedications and improvements, emergency =case and storm
drain facilities required by the Planning Cossissiw for
a residential subdivision of 18 jingle fully lots on
52.88 acres of land in the Ver; Low Residential District
of Sapphire Street, south of Almond Street (APH 1061-
091-03).
D. CtXSX Tf ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have bad public bearings at the
tine of first reading. Decond readings are expected to be
routine and non- controvelvial. They will be aetai upon, by
thA Council at one time rlthout discussion. The City Clerk
will read the title. Any item can be reamed for
discussion.
1. No items submitted.
E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following item have boon advertised and /or posted u
public hearings as required by law. The chair will open the
meeting to receive public teatimoay.
1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESAME11T AND BICH OROINANCE AMEND)MUr
141
88 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA - Various =rdments to
tia Sign Ordinanco regarding neon signs and window
signs. Continued frog September 21, 19886 Request that
item Le continued to November 2p 1988.
i+
PAGE N,~ vV•
City Ccuocil Agenda L
October 19, 1988 12
ORDINANCE N0. 358 (Pint reading) 142 ;
AN CkDINANCB or THE CITY COUNCIL OF YHE
y r`. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,, CALIFORNIA f
APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88.01,
AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO COCAN3NGA r
µ MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR
NEON AND WINDOW SIGNS AND ADDING
PROVISION FOR TEMPOFARY SIGHS FOR CITY
LPOHsom mc.tAL EVENTS
s
2. CMRAL PLAN AHLYDMEWT 88 -039 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A 149
�� request to anend two sites of the Last Use Wp of the
General Plan, located on the mouth side of Highland Road
at Milliken Avenue on 9.3 acres to the west. of ;Mliken
1 , and 12.9 acre& to the east of Millilen. The r,yuest
T proposes the switching of Medium Residential to
u Neighborhood Comereial between the tro rites - APE 227-
' 011 -22 and 202 - 211 -48. WITHDRAW RY APPELLANT
3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMSNr AND VICTORIA COMKUWLTY PLAN 149
AMENDNENr 88 -02 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to
w mend two sites of the Victoria Comunity Plan Land Use
il Map, located on the south side of Highland Road at
Milliken Avenue on 9.3 acres to the vast of Milliken and
12.9 sera* to the east of Milliken. The request
proposes redecing the Medinm -High Residential
designation (14 -24 dwelling units per sere) to a Nedium
Residential designation (8 -14 dwelling units per acre)
and switching the designation of the two sites to
m
Neighborhood Coercial on the southeast corner and
Madras Residential on rle scuthirost corner - APN 227-
011-22 and 202 - 211 -48. tr=RAW11 BY APPELLATE
4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CEjMRAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88- 150
UNITBi -V A request to amad the General Plan Laud
use Nap from ory Lou Density Pasidential (1 -2 dwelling
units per acre) to General Comnreia7 for 57.5+ acres of
land located south of 24th Struet between Cherry Avenue
and the I -15 Preewny. The Cic.• Council will considur
Other appropriate General Plan land use categories
(Neighborhood Commercial, and Office) - APH 226 - 121 -089
11, 12 and 226 - 112 -03.
•r City Council Agenda
. 5�.•3 , October 19, 1988
...
PAGE ;^;
=�
13
RESOLTION NO. 88-634
172
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCM OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG., CALIFORNIA,
REOOMHENDINO APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN
AiMNUXW 88 -03C, TO AMEND T3E GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE NAP IWA VFRY LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
TO CZHERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 57.5* ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN
CHERRY AVENUE AND THE I -15 FREEWAY,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MARE
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH 226-
121-08, 11, AND 12
5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN
150
AMENDMENT NO. 88 -05 - UNITGZ - A requsss to amend the
(
Etivande Specific Plan Map from "VL" (Very Low density
residential, 1 -2 dwelling units per acre) to "CC"
(General Comsercial) for 57.5E acres of land located
south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -15
Freeway; and Erna "PC" (Freeway Comarcial) to "CC"
(General Commercial) for 6.5 acres of land at the
westerly conjunction of Cherry Avenue and the I -15
Freeway. The City Council will consider other
appropriate Etivands Specific Plan land use categories
(Neighborhood Commercial, Convenience Commercial,
Freevay- Related Commercial, Office /Professional) - APN
226- 121 -08, 11, 12, and 226- 112 -03.
ORDINANCE N0. 376 (first zeading)
174
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C'fY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ETTVANDA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 88 -05, AMENDING THE ETIWAHDA
SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM "VL"
(VERY LOW) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1 -2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO "CC" (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) FOR 57.5• ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET
BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND INS I -15
FREEWAY{ AND FROM "PC" (FREEWAY
COMLRCIAL) TO "GC" (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
i I
FOR 6.5 ACRES Of LAND AT TIM WESTERLY
COHJUNNTION OF CHEkpY AVENUE AND TIM I -15
FREEWAY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOENIA-
APN 226- 121 -08, 11, 12, ANJ 726 -112 -03
a es
4J:
k`.
City Council Agenda
PAOF..k 'ri+
i;
y�%.
a October 19, 1988
14
�'
33r•.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES6mn AND GENERA. PLAN ANENDMBNT 88-
-176
l,r6.
038 - QUINTESSENCE D VELOPMBNT - RELATED FILE1
<
V1
TENLITIVE-TRACY 13359 - A zoquest to aamnd the Land Use
Map of the General Plan from Park to Very Low
for
Residential (less than 2 dvelliog usits per acre)
east aide of Sapphire Street,
3.85 acrd located on the
- AIN 1061 - 691
South of Hillside Road
i
r�
RESOLUTION N0. 88-635
191
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWHGLORHIA OF TEE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr r
�
APPHOVIEO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03B
TO CRANCG THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM
PARE TO VERY LOX RESIDENTIAL (2 DN6Ll.ING
UNITS PER ACRE) ON 3.85 ACRES ON TEN EAST
BIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET, BOOTH OF
HILLSIDE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAHONCA,
CALIF02NIA AND HALING FINDINGS l4 SUPPORT
THEREOF
7. CONNON-TY '9' ELOPMBNr BLOCK GRANT HOUSING ASSISTANCE
housing
193
PLAN FOR 1989 -1991 - Identify Lng need for
Raaeho Cucamonga as required
assistance in Lou City of
S. Department of Rousing and Urban
by the U.
Developmaat.
i
RESOLUTION MO. 88-636
212
A RgSOLUTIOM Of THE CITY GOUMCII. OP TIM
II
CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR
TH9, 1989 -1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM
S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Be- 11-
213
MATLOCK AND Aga - An appeal of conditions of
approval foc a 6,385 square foot two -story office
land on the southwest coiner of
building on .40 &urea of
^incyard Avemla and 8an Bernardino Road in a Co®unity
Co.�&rcial District within the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan - APN 207 -102 -09
k
r •
.w.�,sk: .. agdl... - ��.a��,'.iw:- >c >(•it'�i:•. =t! YYiw
FY PAGE
City Council Agenda
0 tabor 19, 1988 IS
r O 4
v
' �, Y. YDaLIC HSARING;i
The following item have nn legal pablication or posting
4 requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive
i public testimony.
;L•
,y31 1. No items submitted.
x.'
G. CITY ll1 LOWS STAFF RHPORIS
The following iter:a do not legally require any public
testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for
public input.
e 1. CITY -WIDE SMOKING ORDINANCE - Recommendation from the
Advisory Commission to eons der an Ordinance permitting
smoking in certain facilities and areas in the City.
Continued from August 17, 1988- Request that item be
coatinuej to November 16, 1988.
y 2. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE HELLMAM AVENGE ROCALYPTUS [:l
' WINDROW AS A POIti'I OH DISTOBIC INTEREST -The eiat" It
Preservation Commission had recommended point of
+! interest designation for the eucalyptus trees on the
vest side of Hellman Avenue between Base Line and Is
Ronda.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-637 287
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE HELLMAN
AVENGE WINDROW LOCATED NORTH OF BASE
LINE, SOUTH OF LA ROHM, AS A POINT OH
HISTORIC INTEREST
], STATUS 2RT ON T8E TBOMAS ROUSE, 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE 288
The Historic Preaarvation Comic sion reconsidered its
recommendations to designate the Thomas House as a
landmark and voted not to recommend designation.
4. NORTHEAST PTIWANDA COMMUNITY PAP.R PROJECT YINANCB7G- 315
Consideration to designate the City proceed with the
sale of Certificate of Participation to reimburse the
general fund or other available moneys for the
acquisition of land relating to the Northeast Community
Park Project. g
j
PAGE
City Council Agenda
October 19, 1988 16
01,11-all
.r M.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-638
319
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
PROVIDING THAT PAYMENTS MADE BY THE CITY
IN CCNRECTION SRTH THE ACQUISITION OF
LAND RELATING TO THE NORTHEAST ETIWANDA
COMMUNITY PARR PROJECT ARE TO BE MADE IN
ANTICIPATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE
PROCEEDS OF A PLANNED LEASE FINANCING
WITH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO BE
ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING CERTAIU ACTIONS WITH
RESPECT THERETO
5. COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY RESIDENTS RECARDING :NSTALLATION
OT FENCE FOR BRIDLE TRAIL ON SAPPHIRE.
6. APPOINTMENTS FOR TASK FORCE TO REVIEW PAR[ AND
320
RECREATION FACILITIRS — Appointment of one councilmember
and designation of Mayor to servo on task force to
review park and recreation facilities.
B. COUNCIL BV3M3S
The following items have been requested by the City Council
for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although
the Cb.lr may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT rROposITION 85. (Buquet)
323
I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXTMRS`TIEG
This is the time for City Conceit to identify the items they
wish to discuss at the next toasting. These items will not be
discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next
meeting.
J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State In prohibits the City Council from
addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for
a subsaqueat meetiag. Castanets ale to be limited to five
minutes per individual.
01,11-all
.r M.
PAGE
City Council Agenda
October 19, 1988 17
Sig
K. AWOURKHM
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of gaucho
Cucamonga# hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda we posted on October 14, 1988, seventy -tw
(72) hours prior to the s sting per A.B. 2674 at 9720 -C Base
Line goad.
Sig
1
s:
�4.
:r
1�
e
N FNF +opo npNnaar rarNdnonrnnn�+Na
irN °E nFr Nwo nnrvr n N
u a i I i r
6
ZI
< 1
• Z it Nal NaFOPOrNnYN4FOPOwrvn INaFOPOrNnaNdFOPO
6_ .rviF�rvNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnf Y!!!frlIYNMNNNNOanNa
< 1 P NNM1NNNrvNNNNNNM1NNNNNrvNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
t) I NM1ryrvNrvNNM1NNM1NNNNNM1NNrvNNNM1NNNNNNyM1�NM1M1NryNNN
"JO' 1 Pn�i.��FL2ti Z x�S r L �LJ ZPSL �Y f
6PPVF�^°. L ^SF W F WM W`WU n6 W
<:n60w ^< O ..✓ .n p. W.^+M< r wM NW
i QoNYN.QUO� ° x °n °2W r QiiQ...Q..o NQi- WQr.°.iz 2
1 ) W SrG P� +^ N FJ F GrZNS2FOVU O
.. 1 O� 1"O •FPr J NNWQ V
oYW i o +o i o ooF2lior wo rai Q<
i tia i uiF � o ruQOU ` u�uu`QMUUUUUUryo �r
i.�.. QJ° t J °..s Q �riiJpJ Jy¢W U°QQOM
iI O I OU U O A Yi N� �w0<WN <Ot OiFo °
I O 002 J.w ¢jF 'J6nWYOn 6
°Q °.N...°n isx °�rq .zl °�'�i'[W wiYw
QI NP26JZ OW_p <ZO < J O� OF Qr V
� � � \N W6 W w 2 WMi� �t 1�ZJWf <NNVLL.t
P �r ZJwZ YI"O IN •'Q «Q N
:Wr �WNeLL a �.e QJJerm
°� �°. °ooxo Q uLf z ° NFU Vjos >Y WuYLLZOJe
Li M '� NW�.W rNO iaWW YueNWOOOlY .n xNWy¢
r ., .N+ozir osa ¢ °a�ooiiJ��r�zJ°d z�Yn� »u.a G�
N N zNJU O° $W+.N ~ae <�J. S +NrWNLL¢WWw oY
L �( Yrt000 %nSw\ <pOVWnpw 7tW <ZrW J^
U y UVJL6Y... OP.+L NQF <NLL +V VC OV.[Z W <64'iO r�N
R
3
2 :
w i u z a
y N� 191 uNII1 N rYUY
K O r Q 62 N2 Zu°i� 29
J u� W " eiWUS °j�N ¢NO-
t O N NW ZW NH <SN< W 7w N^ S VN
6 N Z<JrN O Wiu
mWW .tN UY ^° Z 2°O Y O.tFF Z S
Y_U �,xr
L < JL< OOS��[[6 °O YVFLL ^W «tOWI" UWJQO
ZOLNV N<uMV
N I � ZiQQW W VrJrJ= SS °J�Y.ZiWYZWYSJ 3�.0
�< OFZ SOrW2¢ ° <r6J
J I .� ti SN <L.ViV6 OCNJWr! �^FNNrULL <O Yy� 6M
O J St Q< UUOE JQN.J .Wp7W Z'JO °
q s < <JSQaQ �i t «i « < « «« <mmooWmNNNm�sm
° 61 F N q Nq0 +0 N + ^FY ^FPnnPdnaPNOrFnTVII rOq
O r OOnraPP aFrNwNF..N YaNOnral�Y YF
w I r w w.di .°.. Oin�.ai .aiN.l aw F.NiP PN O iw.aiw wwwO.Yidiw
I r
J
r
Z
■'..
N
u
N h
u •c
6 <_
Y
z •
O a
M1
pV
S
V
a
a
Vi
N"" gpNOOONOOOepao °°e°n..grop°p�OM1�eoerv000
OM1OFOONh0000000°OOONM1..q O00F000p OOONOOV
OONNM1nNnOON FNNO ppppNN ^yO�pOgNPOPNw� ^nwNON
ry�IOr�ngNyr�wwgOpPOM1Nn I_ Pq._arNryO NI..P II
NN M M1 wO P M1n w
+NgINOhOPO +N qY O.pN pp Nryq.f N.phOpO +M1gYN pFOPOw
«O ¢ <O C.p .p P.hFFFhFFhhS000000000PPPp ppp ppPTO
fIN. NrhM1IM1. Fr�rrrr�FNNNNM1NM1NNNNM1M1NrvNNM1NNryN
NM1NryNNryryryryryM1ryryNM1NNNNNNryWryNNNNNNNWMrvNNNNryry
60 M r Z _N_ y.F _U N
6S Y\ 2 uLi OW WW WN < ¢ W
YYO �Y v�Oh uu �w r.hiWWM1 ..w I Fry h
»F .7 WJr Y q
a¢ ¢QY �[ ^¢iri 6 +aa0¢JOO VFQ ryn a
osioQN ��iha°oaW °WWJW« Y°Y1saWZ F wi
o j S o°N+ z2 SzNZ >�a°WWWZ °N
WF°IW-- W- �. <hNN•� ^.- pJ. -..•.. unJJVhYd IN• N
eh < n zr.W N i' . °Oi .wNOr000 °.+J a�JJUOQOi "'� o
i JOheN uuuuYU ouiouuuuJJ >PJJ yJrvytyY' MJ u
< +O Y.
�tt O ^.. OON W'G ON °..aN Jn.OMV6 � V
i'hyW >h <h 'JN� .qi .Niw .Y JQOT�.ILL'yYJ NN °Zw V.°iN W °N W
O Vt06SN • ii>♦O OY `p OJOyJJtN Si�F..y
�`n `liaaa.°...S.aNCNNN�os °W" Ni"iJ�.°Yr« a ;p o i
N uQaW J ONN <WFtJQ 1 J <J �'\'YNZyhNN JI..UW U_
O Q N OY JJQtNULhrJ°S JN' i `JJhWaOt
CI JW .`i «NVQV <VUV W Y�SwY _NV NNO N VYZ>. S>
WVQI Oy000 r.Zj1yY60w tWWahZY Vi _NO
Mir Oh�ehW2 32N�¢WO,1 .Li.26.V.�SY�40WY >22"ttQG6<
LrLU2rOeh�O >OJJOW SO YUSOVS aJ O�i606Z
°c oY iy.si.°.oL..oY.0 LLQO io oo�¢aa� °z <no��.a..ir YY.i ii
o" 1aY> syN <�aQaasucYysMrai� ^�s +nNOLLeaaob �' <1.
iYL
t}
c
1r
y
t<[ rY.[ r^ Y <N O Oh 6WVW O
Y Wf>]QS �JLQGrp.N,l r.rN� OOQJY'W JtiQ `Zp,U VO2N¢� Y
SWrV <h..Q NJJJ..i¢VOw < y W<¢pNW�
°SWUi <Vy =Ur« WNO`Jr< Wy� W SN1\W
O ft? ^�W wr VLZNW___ <tJtWOrV OtIYJ aN2 OwJ
. Su22< YY< Y. Y_W O_w_t Yy� 2 tYi.
Y¢'J S_O 6oO.L6wJ SVYUu11 h�NOw <LGWWWJJI YO
° p OOV� < }V I[W�er <NJO O °uLYZ.2 J�6 yJLL
J ZWVUwtJ J<JJ1.Z°.JUa °< }ZY pLp��N2H Ja >VYh tWS°OWLL6
YVUUVVUNVVQYRNJOyUVyVVNVOi000WiWwM�LrLL Y'17
}1
° <1 �nn..O hPNPnYONOFPNlp..q F.L MNNPNOnNnO°ry..np p.pp
61 NynNOPOn Cnnnglf.y Ol OnINOhOOnON ^hggNnNOq
r
it
`Y
• t
g
°neoion000a000nao
°m+o. °onoPS °o oo�gro� ^• ?!
.i nor ;
gNNNONNOhO
•• • dnnwFPd
pl
n µ n w N= Nn000mOdwndNNOnONNNwOOnn
M1•Ohn M1 Owwn
1 1 NI nwIM1NnNNOwrNw
N
„ryNnwNtwNNnnwNNM1NnhO! w n
Nn ry
6 <1
ti N Iq.OhOPOwNnlgdhmP Ol1enn nlNd�nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
tq� O 61 OOOOO�ngAAAwM1MhM1hrM1l"M1M1f M1hh1�I -w I�1�F•�MhhM1hl�I�h
i � fl ryryNNnHNNNNNNNNNNnNNNnNNNNNNnNnnnnnNNNNNNN
} � ;
W� Ww N I•
\V wU�
WWI .1.•W16¢
Y 1 W W N •waw wN
M1WSIUd6Wq
`S
1 r u f 06U p
` N Plwd 6¢O¢V
a V•¢.1� rvYW^ T ^•
izs n ySn�
1 'y<•ZhNJM •Y«f • YLIp J O•hl•OJ
<S6
.O .O ZJ
OJO JfnVY• t_O 6ZlnOOlLO< ry•�
YW V JMOMFYUWYV •Q�p M.h.••Vi•JVV6i
JVU•.0 �
�•nLaeJ�o¢ a �h < <a N io�o°i•�N�r°-
W
Ni
O 6N�NOr iY N .6 yy11 �¢
Y�M1 m •Y L•y� W OOwWO
`Y �nWO
n±J OPNNJ6 ON WW ¢< !: P6V 00-> »Y ¢•^
YSao•. �'os�i ury <g »Mry¢
iN:
i YamNaWal >.
qi <J NO<
1 O •M1i•6 Z:P W: � }•Vw JI+•a0 C•Z�¢y
1 JwwO
t0��
MI INOhNUNINOV. S •p0° OOWSL= J61Y6J��OJ1
V.6
SO•t WJ OY V Y Y6U•M °N
al ° «`WJ a <JJJ o a.-W >aN
roai
UO�SYUWVOpf'2
� ^ym. ->L a.•g oM'aa `r.. <izma>
Y � O <Y606•w6W 1 <W pt =r < =w?NOW�<
� « <tJOi <Y Zj0
Vp Ji¢6 ��++ S¢S 1n• ZON�NO
diJO¢aaW¢ LLuN > <2�� °$.. �ur��¢.1 �.a. °p M a.-°..��O�a
<sM1W z
&•2.•..a.
wi sa�JW¢ppW W
uJPmaaW�o���Qiao��+o >u ¢•W-on �.°.i�noaovmo¢Naa »»
W � W
V Z O
y V Y Q
1 O
• _ n
1
2 C O •[
�
1 F• t f[ <
Y •= i � ¢ Q s Z J
U JL 1 {YW W N W.-SW ^• `
VOONI"N U hU Y_ YYC�u�h «_u1
¢' •• SWWN =N
6 1 YL � 52162! O Y�i •Y{L 1~JPJNw ¢
pWOtJlpt
JWr loRW 7W SNO .O i•<+•W+F �LW<t>- J<a
f i ^ <JJV YNGW ¢O �o- fCwpWiN_ O CwLW <
LL
O oa'�rW «VhYU
°i �JU¢12
uVJ{h6W JOI"6 O_O_OZ <O •J'•vWmL6
duQ «mWLJSJ<
« O ZJ CVSFtryUVO
QQJN O• -WWS YL +U6VWQ0
« p< JOZ<6I`L •2 O`CU <W tSJ6K�NwJ��W Sww
VYWWU�
_
J YO
uaoJ•W[SS I�Nf( ww •>Ln�>Si1��Yf¢[SyJI�•Oi•¢JOJJf
VM1VVOVVVaZ
Y WI
N W� M1mdlNwmnwllwgMNP wN7dINnPhrymPln d'PhddNO
nlVwhmN .NnPnwhww..h0lfwhNm
•' d
° q^jmryryNl NM1PNdNndd »m
d •. N N» y.Nidi w.a..N. w nd. .°..<..d. •' .d. .°..°..d•
.o. i .. .N..°..d. u1- .d.'Cmd..•.d. .N.
3
1
a P
•• roSOaO pr OOrrONOr0000PrySSryOryOnNgSODn�rypOi �O
r �i r w�.° I. a^ na�0/ n1�f�wPwPggr '�•°J•.°. °n::��nngiSe lP..°..°�.°n •`nPdg nln•1 °e n'Jnl
1 rr Nr,< F arD nn
s i r P, N o J e n o�Nn
< 1
a
s °�� �• + +� +il°na nnrr °nnw°N Dp Oa aaa ra a.°o as Pa n °I.w ^reaFeP
s ti w^ i�' �n�lnnnnnnnnnnnnwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn�nnn�n °n n°
VJ i� NnnnVw,n nnnryNnn niln nnh�nl`l •`ry ryil nl`'M1n nryl`lnnnnnnnnn
gVg 1
Q r -3�° •
Q
N
O
ri
WW� o
Ji
J Jt`
° s
1 1 W O •Li
N R
iwiO`n •`+
oD °1LU�rz
V a°V
nnNPnJ
W W� F W W W Lisst3hi
R ° WY °ww
.• 6nH`YN ^Oe O ' F ryr\ IWfF
P Y ONNN `2 ^ °•
W nQ +W ►eiie�au W.°. °L %�u_si n °F�Q.W WW_.is..W
F ° aSJPN ^ J e N
O Nt0�1 Ofry Pn n °t¢D� NFO 0 00
0
►t
ut •^ •W .W ° � of o0"oo oo
u �uuWU FWa �{uWU� Fu o
g
�uu uuueuu
o sPQFCWSZ�aT�z�Fn a N'6� <W$ ►
°i t'F NO���'oWU °eyzu° Xe of :W w
W R
az�rFrrW Don�:�O .�! -°•N.a -nn•¢
mo tYYSlIts�°P tt.zN ° Ntztp ° zuo.N-
��ONQMSWONWOnN1n� 90�S �NSN rS �W JOiy
Oj°<<VI. N••Q tNO tNNN %eNR
2Wf6► jr <J Win <r< ufW °
yW OV °VN >QVUFrU L`Ya WOZyuy� OM1W2W
� ^WOW02 <rOSLQO�r�`yuF�O pZp UWU� ^1
�CruWiV WStNt-WS YYII 1
[Vw•R p6 VII O ILUpW ¢.Lry 1V 002 ►66QYLQV°lVGO
1 ¢ _
< 6
6
W y w
<l W p L a• < 6 6 2
W NU
» u ►zD s y u
i iWiY Nn'• .1. N.°, .1. of ° a u 9'i Wb8.°...1_
< Y�SNJ2�^ N• <4 rS�J r j* V26
2 •°1¢ ��JOW�?L WJ< s¢F° o F <Ni °.`.mW ^'•u J=
oW < of <RW ^$Ni g bo�sQ _
¢>LN uu11 UONWJr
O T6<YL¢¢ OVUW {y�N¢� W¢NS^YWNO¢JOOwNQ¢
•°zWWJW gzWJ >z Iz. F8u °< F °iN�rF ° °1`n.<. >jWZSo
� i izW <•°. �iwru <sri•oJON LWFI�►J<zW�F F «D3
� � °lursu �F <_Qaz •N• °J <°.uarFW ►viui° zDW ��.
e �O`'�UOODSf OUi••<iO
000
w <¢L6 6 °O f46
1[v6UVY <ILN >N`SCOVVIM C�
FV6Li¢ � O «y < 4
y; LOLVLF1010¢ r61t6 j66¢61C¢QOI
1 <TI FrNPN°dN NnM1NrPNwnedPYadOJPFreaaPNNJ rnOONd
°1 OrNrM1FYrFNnr wr
� 1 �eaFPry ^er ^'nN`y ^nr•°••°•wP <.Nin wwa.Nl �w lNanNid1 ^N
r V _
f � V
d
i
t
i
1s
9
0
1
■
r °D.°io ao.°noaon °o rawni.o� °o ocli Rio °o
° � i aon�r° vnshirr° ma °gfn8a;.�� °gg°NnT11A..°.�p;.8 a
•1 ryNfN rP P OPf M1ON a _
6 tl
JI f O
1
1
Z •1 fPahOPOrNnf OahOpOwNnf OOFO Or��
O �1 OgOOOO PPPPPP^hPOO+00�40D�
< jl NryNNNf NNNNNNNNNNNIhY NNff NNNryryry VNNry
y N
° 1 Y L L OML�tLO MY N NW Y
V 1 i °FtiFHp Oh <YF r12r 2
2 ^ �..rNf2Vrwwu MpZr OY°jOtrw V
¢ c °u a Os a.1.P- �acsaaQat .eir r,Q.1 gr�or °a u�.a. i
i p � �zi.gi.uuxiszJ W:MFO =rwri of o
1 'Jq ° O r Y000er iOr �2< L O
1 �� J JWU WLWYYJVO Yt. •01 YNUNNUYnMJ
0% OfO=iQUV O JQi6UQY�WaJ W
1 uurD �c" <e.: �a z a �tiugW rYils °e �'YW
i N�l[rzn
> Z L\NN 6 °C AN� <�NhJV
LJ rNYWWN� SN D 2 O<
1 VW }WJ�ip�Or J ryV°_r�W{ ^J� ttyy
61 yNl° <uwN N.QiNWW J °N Oy NMtlW
NI N64 ZY _NMwf O JNWN6rVNVVj<
OI N�O IMj� JJ ^J Yj fm0 �Q
OWr gOWWJ }y SW6J � <t\J
V O»N�YVr WS LV Z VhO7VSW
ul ¢�WNrW<OOQ<Yi�q�W<gt\°s1 wO�p<OV�O
rl .LU J�.}i.�Vw »Y��OOVOJLLmz.= 9x°00^
° °W�„yy J ° <Wisi
^OO aONr6QVNPPnhrYOQt\h06�gVQJJ6
V u
pp p 2
1 =� r =YVV VtI M
1 W Z
1 2 C V OOON,O� Y
L W6Z tQ
L LgOpOOV< V
O V 3 O
°LAC a Yf <f «RO ML V2 .l�L
Z ^ ^ ^O N at1 ssN0
1 SQYW < Q6Q6Q�6 S Yt N6W Qq
s 1 aN ooggqooWahu v a Qrr
06N�C� 06rjWWUrWWY2<Oi06YV< W.Zn<
g00¢`N�Wiuii ^ ^ ^� ouuo u Q
zzz 9'"iai'r"yz3yzuD `j y 3'"uh�N� u�q
0 1 �gWZOOSQ
QQQWW <WN - WIZ2QQ�QLNr Sy }u
1 WW .. i gWWWWWWU W DDZ O<oiQiWW
.N. mmio oN <NFZ�FSFJO n zaW z
J _ FZ_<_O_t Qr Wh J ^NZNr6
S QW'J » >99W %N7WUy1
O `�N 3r0VrgS000pOU ^ <6t a6r t'J yy112W
M VINJWrNNNNNNNOLO ^hOe�L6jS,t
N �1 rrNrOarNrnhhhhOaOnq Nf Nf Pn N'f aP
1 hn^n_a r..0000..rrrrgN.paaa00pO i.^a0
w 1 N .awrw.ai�ynnAnnhyw��w +yff =hyP
J
1
L 1
\
� 5
eo ogoapo «pooaPPOnoo°oaa0000eoo°hao°w°pry
1 OPO OPPnOOMh000nPOPO0U00POOpO000m0 °000.10a
�a ^wftom— 8ryhMhVVOOnPnOYap +Ohnp n. Y�rh
r hNOarw p f °an ^y'nr „ah0 Oy�PnI°VU
i rr roi;
Y
z ei in��^ yprrynrrahrPernnrrahgPOr «nrwahesorrvnr
n «nNnry«nnnnnnnnnnYrrr +Y +rrrrrara
n s ¢� it + ri�rrr +Y+ + +Y rr+rrrY ++ +YrrYVrrrrrrrr+
V { hhhrhhhrhhhMhhhhhhhhMhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhrh
U ZI NNNN «NnhN NryNNN «N «NNNNNNNNNNNNry «NNNNNNNNNry
u ' N
Q 66Qt°ip S ¢�O � Q06 ¢ W6n¢¢
i .S.• 2 FYW �rJO \Y¢N 6UYZ Y= Sr °rN
c c coo z oily« WQWSJO go 00
f PF Y YUY�U <UUYOOIOONL�06h u¢i S"FfY�YY
rOhQW iarw NipW {` ar6
a'tl � p iJM ¢ �QWr hM {\ 60 py W<pr
P¢ NW O UU 6 \QY Oa O {�W Q 6 J
° yy f T.¢WLOJ 6 �¢SV
1 °�W Vp``r� <3.°i i[�lQNW�Wh6 yN�
OS "V <f .°q_q wOp�00�ytl r.O Clr>jwiw° W1tY {�
61 r° � °wl PW errOwNhrYa .{r ��YV�dY
< n N�^n,W WJas¢WeyW ¢r <srr
opri> LuuWOSW ¢
n.En i.+u "1 9�^.inW {rte prWi ¢rN`�¢WCO � �oiEi.e
uu <m< Nharjrmu <nFiu .°. J.<.iw.<- x>zv °.< -�Wa�J Or=
O r rN uW�nLNZ r�WGJr >�u °.¢.SZ�N�FGGr.Uiti 2 >N<En6U0
6vu63 j TOp Or�mCJiU'V"a�O 000ffiJS�Wt °OHP�Ow %WVQ6
62 H-
NYUVrNr >hnOCr h..u4W >Uhr
°
> <• � S” Z�V
6 N UmN { i { WWI
z r Ti�W .tl. uu> W YW Zy°.i a °WN :S rIii
LN¢rGNIVm'E'W ¢ >¢{ y ^ {,1LCiN�'nK p°i 00
2 TWrQr QW4WJQ u1 V< O YYY
O 1 J � 4rVr JW NJ2 <Y.W U.� pLL {O{ WSIL S�'U Y��Vtr<N� t
N q :VC >OWJ.. °`:fi jW�y06J6NN w_WZNL YYr: MY13�3t<i
N 1 �'Z < ^yIOYSUUUw"ly °6¢ °uOW� Q °0° °f I6Q ;000
<VV GJW..wtlWGWWNYy� Nm {` Ntlwr <JJ {ZihOi >uu
O 1 < < {a { «Na <t <mgNeOpgOOmYYYNSUN IV YY°VSYU
N }1
r <1 Ti+ r'+ hannNaPnn .n +na +�nNhOwOaPa +eraOwnNa
QI NOPhNPrynnP +Pnhn NO°vIP PP «aahFnO q°
r 1 °.hihi 'V a.... w.°iP r. w w.h1 °'_.aiw °�'wrwnlw nni raa°
l
� ■
4
i-
Y
P
s;
ie
n
6 t_
K
i f
O 6
yL 6
J
V
a
t r
m +na +OPaFaoneoowo°Nnaoone NnFnnooerono-
p�npnpnrwpryoryreoPOOnnwoonoSr .�NFro naao�oao
..O NN•I p.fnePNwM1O1�pnON pf nnyy�� �n dwnwnNnrOannp
fP+FO of aP�N wr ..nrynOfP +FnO�NOrPnp� Nl.ninn+
.. ry F
't M fN nan No an..Nwn Nn Or
n +ww O a r P ryr
N nn
nYViNpN V+aia.d °�Y'MFFFhF�nFFOppipppCCpPPPPPP
FFFFhFFrFFFFrhFwFMFFFFFFFFFFFFhFwFFFFF
NN\h1NNMhNNMNhNNNNNNryNNNNNNNryhNNNNNNNNNryhNNN
Y pU lir.°i L!
O
r�w.Fnro NM >� nN
oeoao�W oe�� oo z
Y UJYNQ YYp JY � OYWV
a of uW
�NKry Yw �� 1. oFF..r"s
1 =6P W ` lNwWr OJY
NJLI JL a �
5 +5S °d T 1 .0 Z�
Hi �sWn ��isQ >F UZ, KwQO W12Y�zNN
VGxP p jF. i Y O..WLSOO<
OI to mCVNV KKWrN K.�.. QVWVl!Ny
u; FQWr •OSxR� <.°i „r�Z6.wi�nV.°i0
N�NW�{{uNuII �y V nJ
SV WUIiOJ�nF KV �QiMYJpG�n «LL
P >6rr)C6 j�6�OrO�pNO�� >.Si6
¢ V Q
i r W H
Z 2 N
J . K
�z a
00 yL• G n< 6K V.>.Vr 410
WWO V•OJ2U �VV oY2 SV
Q .•tyVWK ) .ZiN OVLr O �< U � V...OiW r°.2
j1 ^�N6 w V ' i_OWN Nu � SJwO Q1 O
WJNU V.. ¢.[S <nLN.SfN xFL 6� li� �
Y\�o�as Sti Y+ GF »JrW.oa Yuo zdiW�'ioiW °w` ��°-. K�o
uNr F LxLL <N K o mru o¢ s i �t�a¢ aN•.
° uaKi3 p2 •-zW3 .c S s11'o� °Sd`�'n�. WsoW tQ 2>iu ur.W �W o64
1 LSSVjOO�ZNwV J`Ui` YJ OQVW «JYSK_ONKVZKSOY I[VJ
� 000 tWN tali „w WI'•f• <V22�2f.J �YO7WFW _L 6
S l�1(W <MWL 3. i i[ KK
J 1 <K J=NWrrJ OVLY2��6 `RQ}`pS W.ViW> JS yO UONr¢� OF�O
O WI U� 000 O WbWVYW.W �OV0V1U 00WliJ °S „S...Si .2..iilt�Z L.K/
�1
� Ki NFpnONF.Inwenf aVn6PnhnPnan wprnfN +nn a.pNFnN
e OI OmpnnaF rryNPpryrywNnO Pf ry.pO OnONaPnnOOpmO OPn
1 ryn r'nnM ^rwMnry�Ji�yO= y/� /w /fy rrf OPw�wwnrni Fir
nl
`r!
F °
P
y
�
7
N
1
i oaooeefgnP ^ryo °n.°.i •...... So °r rw °o °rn °o °oo °o NP n °o°
FI OFOOYOP
ry l w arn°i •N.pwO'^PONp nr P NFFOOYryOMpOyaOFOONOPFVd
W a; fry <OrNf Oily NO wf natnPf.f NOa UYf CC NON
6 QI r <On II <IINn aNNY .. phw O
rP
s
u i
O b;pfYPOrNnf OaFYPOwN 11VNaFOPOrN Of NaFOPOrNryfba
Pn ny°1 °.°lMOnR�Orwr „wwwwr..M1 NNNNry hNNNn^Innnnn
�l<I nFFN�FFnFFFFfyFFwrFnrwwFM1wF� .N•y rrytinrAFr
!1 NNNNryNNNNNryryryNryNNNNNNNNNryNNM1NNNNNNryNNNryryN
V 1
1 �
2` � r¢F Q`f yi. ry0..¢ '• r y0w�w w ON Yf
6 1 QYO 6QUNW °
' FwN J Jn2
i °rw ua
ulo
i uNU uWiWi.. :u °Y
irlWt y�3 °$N
i .N.1°onFU OU.�g�o
Li z�yzuz y
aoWa °o.2.
ul a.+ti JZyoN�¢
NI <Sr<¢6•. SOy �
oo�oN °YY N°iu <s WWZ
�NV �ryOU°i� i�i
¢ <tL6P¢V¢N¢r M�
w¢ ¢ Y ¢oWQ ini 2
�.-r r inwi nn$ d..
zoso N oi'r. `° ya< disc
�u u o ury. °u uar 'IJn
J�J Na3. Q�8 °m
3 °
^° . .25. ..P
.” ...�
VO °00
N <WWJac IsmuI oyur
JNJ .O.°.N r NiF2Z
s
V Z 6 • V
y ` 20 •^
N i 30L > Yr
V_ •Wi �' •Ni F V W y y
N r ) �2 Fr pyXJ MN 4N N O
° z
WS¢�<[S°
<Oj.[•PiuJ 1 tt ^YU••{{U t •y�i NY9J aJJ
VV Vtt <Q_y � Ot°YWV°JC..d20 yrJJYJ
O Jy O�jp UV Z4¢V Q� »y2..66 °6VSNF¢S¢ L1Wy F2d
F 20 WJJ „NN2W� L¢w<.jy <•Var >SyV1Nf¢ ONWF6YtpOH¢o Yu
N
V
u2 >6plCON QY i�<V iJ2<Ohf >S¢YW�WyjIOU�aQ<WCWr
O WI YJrOi J2yyZZtty -<jH t�tt�Z=�ZZON000¢°66JV6¢6y°
1 aaaWr J °¢¢
<1 OPFPYO rN of r.p ONONaNnFnFdryOPO ^OO N.f PFFhPON00
O 6 FVOOrrrrrnFFy�ryNNffNPFrrr dFNNgwNnOnd
1 n0fnw0�r.Fi r•Fi wwwF°..r'^.dwFO °Vww N.N•.O NFF�yFry.�h
LK�
i
Y i
<
4
< e
S
Y 6
yJ s
u
3
Q
L
Q
T
<
O �
noleoNaFeaPregoe $ ea FnnNOareoeerearye000Ho 0
PNN OOOf IIO ^fp0 OO NnNnOONpOPONryNNNPNF O
Pp.•ON rOPNPOONr nPrYn00 •OF hy�w OnOry! •
aalOhrNOOP�NryNHYHi FOO^a OHNM1 ^.wN nNNnn4 M
of rNrFn yPN w rNP N ••Or F.•n P
r � r ar f ry r O
N
FO•P Y�NnYNaFOpOrrynlNa }OPOrNn lNaFOP U.YNnIN
NN�Nf YYVYT INnNNNnnnNnJaaaaaaaaaFFFFFF
ONnnnMnnnnNNNNNnNNnNI •NnNnNNNNnnnN
FhFFFFFFFFhFhFFFFFhhwFFFhFFh F•.F FF
NryNNNNryryNryNNNNNryNNNM1M1YNNM1NN ryNNNNryNNM1ry.Yry
i j W� 2 YO.N�.LLLO
W ^ L WOWWWWO
•Fi b G j wwZ< •F.•9 H•riri rhi�n
QZ N u¢iQ HO^ QYQQ¢Q ^o
it .cN� xz oa zryxzz r-yN
oN u. i�W ooW�o o ^`e coa.<
u c uu�nn u uuu u.rYu
< � Wait wiva a� �a
g W NuwB asuhWi•°- I.Y^z• � a�
„C5•'1N a <4W: yyL,11NF .r-oH
yFiJ fFF2LN0! i1��O�VO
WuNi3 �.0•iC-NQW .1'WN
�•r o.4 ego°.• azJ��i.ei J°•.°•zus
<xO V•.r ¢iUV••6 iL P•nilQyyU >�U
OFNr•.•6 JQ O O�OWCQ <W
2N62JWJ<JtNVWY <O «xMgg
o su'1'W U�2L".J.0 uazNxannno5
�: }YNNL26NOWN <Nf PNTLW
<OPW.y�LW Qy0 <J<NhPa
cJr�anayN L" -•x <bV VYNaFO yt7
Sy i V
W J
O N YL _t i O y
li WO QF J
Q ow u2 � 1 za
i o aFnr
NV „O SWJ 4W
IfWL¢4
N2 610.•. OV ^N
00 ¢ O <OW
Z Y�=f=6W ^W YW4yL_
V WWr•.• }�6 %ti .
iWCLNOUO4tFyZ^
ox }PtlzQW. 'G
<uJ <ePe `Wpp4 �xppx <
•2•i��NW660XN6ZM
V 4tib06u2•i O� < %rV
4 VVVU V
i222 ¢
L V S •N.••N.• V . N
N < y O O�WON • TUO C.6
t y V W O U
W V O r r6 .¢61A T62J< 6 1••LI Yu2.O
i 26 Vi >} OW J4 uO.4VNJUU2i0 r iJ Ln
��N2 .� e.NtltlN. `<.<21 :WMQ e,;LitlW�6�m¢
'NO O + <J4 <VV j„ •V YVVOMn• N rJIL 1�NW
iL 60WVJ Y JS aN•S.• ]'�rJVC4W
O . O <S ii'¢ �1JW • <LL ONF
hV •�4OTNMCN4�� �C{ ��J fOSQJ �Lj ¢iVOF
• 2= t O <hN V�� _ <ZO >ZOL ¢I]y �J OW
� �tl``¢� O`LW¢JWO3ONNJ� FF� OX <NFUN N1Y XWN
O•L �OU61 L66NW�N�62N��•Oi•NSNNW�YI'J ��JJO��XNY
1 NPO yOna�aOrrrhyOhFFhFOaYlf.O NNNnOrOM^ Or
a�r� FNnOOhrydrrrrPNlnPFrN•"NO..pp SOY
1 rrP•Ni•I NP�Mn�Nn� ^ ^NnnnnydN ^n MNPANINlyN�N'/M
I
1
�'� •J if
_F oat',.
Te:
iFrom:
By:
Subject:
��'��.i:ti�: r_-• :.r@�rinr�,x� „- rio.16�; _= -'�:: :_,;,C,�rt.,..�,�E =,
—' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT-
.
0ctcber LQ, 1980
Clty Counnil and City Manager
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
Jarvis T. 3arris, Associaia Civil Engineer
Authlrizdtion for the assignment of an Arl:lt Crossing Guard
to Vie corner of Chu •h Street and Center Street fcr Dana
Merced Elementary School.
REC&DEIOATICY•
It is recommended that an Adult Crossing Guard be assigned to the school
crossing at the intersection of Church Street and Center Street, servipg
Dona Merced Elementary School.
O,1CK6ROlACl1AYALYSIS•,
Traffic Engineering staff has cotTleted a review of the intersection of
Church Street and Center Street at the request of•Mrs. Karen Spjut, 10167
Ashford Street. Mrs. Spjut's cl:ildreo attend Dona Merced Elementary
School and have experienced difficulty in crossing Church Street at
Center Street.
The results of the review brought to our attention that 48 students cross
Church Street in conflict with 344 veh:eles during the afternoon hour and
75 students cross against 385 cars in the morning.
The Adult Crossing Guard guidelines in use in the City are met, thus
plAcement of a Crossing Guard at this location is justified.
Resp ^ i ugmitted,
RHM:JTH:pam
cc: Mr. Clyde Boyd, Chairman
Public Safety Co®ission
Attachment
?w �
ADULT CROSSING GUARD NEED EVALUATION
Location Cu „v,.y d C¢ti'rEo
Distance from crosswalk to school_ 900'
Distance .c nearest signal or st 'zP siEn_
Width of utreet at crosswalk_ AA'
Date of Pedestrian counts Q.IS pp
1. School crossing at uncontrolled location.
HN0. OF CHILDREN VEHICLE
CROSSING(MINa20) VOLUME
75 3A5
344
CRITICAL
VOLUME
160
2Lo
Crossing guard Justified for 2 hours? �no_
2. School crossing at traffic signal location.
HOUR I NO. OF CHILDREN I TURNING MOVEMENTS CRITICAL
CROSSING(MIN -40) THROUGH CROSSWALK VOLUME
300
300
`-- 300
Crossing guard Justified for 2 houh es,_,
Y s7 ,no_
3. S�mcu, crossing controlled by stop signs.
HOUR NO. OF CHILDREN VEHICLE VOLUME CRITICAL
CROSSING(MIN�40) ON 4 -LPNE STREET VOLUME
S00
Crossing guard Justified for 2 hours? yes_,no_,
CALC. BY
DATE
3
Date:
To:
From:
By:
Subject:
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAfONGA
STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1988
City Council and City Manager
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
James T. Harris, Associate Civil Engineer
;S M�
Authorization for the assignment of an Adult Crossing Guard
to the corner of Hermosa Avenue and Feron Boulevard for
Cucamonga Elementary School.
RE00101 OATIOM:
It is recommended that an Adult Crossing Guard be assigned to the school
crossing at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Feron Boulevard,
serving Cucamonga Elementary School.
lACC9R0UD /Al W.1'SIS,
Traffic Engineering staff has completed a review of the Hermosa
Avenue /Feron Boulevard intersection ..s requested by Dr. John F. Costello
who is Superintendent of Cucamonga School District. The items reviewed
included vehicle and pedestrian counts and observations of crossing
patterns.
The results of the review brought to our attention that 29 students cross
at Feron Boulevard in conflict with 372 vehicles during the afternoon
hour and 35 students cross against SID cars in the morning. Students
must total more than 20 and vehicles more than 375 for the Adult Crossinq
Guard guidelines in use in the City to be met. The vehicle volume for
the afternoon was three short of the critical volume, howler, tta
morning volumes are notably higher than required volumes. These facts
and numbers were presented to the Public Safety Co mission at their
meeting of October 4, 1988 and they unanimously approved staff's
recommendation to assign an Adult Crossing Guard to the crosswalk.
Resp ubmitted, �.
— — t
RHM:JTH:pam
Attachment
is
ADULT CROSSING GUARD NEED EVALUATION
'.Location I- iFRM�S4 � F'E_a'+ti
Distance
from crosswalk to school
2r)ne2 -
�Distance
to nearest signal or stop sign
35
—
'£Width of
street at crosswalk
29
372
Ze
Date of
pedestrian counts 9 i3
8B
—
1.
School crossing at uncontrolled location.
i
r
2.
HOUR
N0. OF CHILDREN
CROSSING(MIN-c0)
VEHICLE
VOLUME
CRITICAL
VOLUME
7.Psa.
8:15em
35
510
375
2 3f�
29
372
375
300
Crossing guard Justified for 2 hours? yes_,no X_
�..�.,.,� .......e�.,., at traffic signal location.
HOUR
ti NO. OF CHILOaFN
CROSSING(MIN -40)
TURNING MOVEMENTS
THROUGH CROSSWALK
CRITICAL
VOLUME
300
300
300
Crossing guard justified for 2 hours? yes_1no.
3. School crossing controlled by stop signs.
HOUR
NO. OF CHILDREN
CROSSING(MIN =40)
VEHICLE VOLUME
ON 4 -LANE STREET
CRITICAL
VOLUME
Soo
500
500
n
Crossing guard justified for 2 hours? yes_ino_
CALL. BY � „ � 0• /
DATE (Q�b /
/-3 �;
�k
C
S�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dino Putrfno, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ANNEKATION 88-01 - PULSAR DEVELOPMENT - A request to annex
a por on o e n ernar no county unincorporated area
located north of Highland Avenue, south of the logical
extension to Summit Avenue, east of the Day Creek utility
corridor, and west of the County /City boundary - APX:
225- 761 -19, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55 and 61.
I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the
oca ency Formation Cammission (LAFCO) Resolution No. 2166,
appointing the City of Rancho Cucamonga as the conducting authority
to the area described in the title of this report as Annexation 88-
01 through the adoption of the attached resolution.
II. BACKGROUND: The entire site is located in the City of Rancho
uc1 amonga's sphere of influence and is fully contiguous to the
existing City boundaries on the south and east. Annexation of the
site represents a logical extension of the current City limits as
well as its services. The City, with assistance of its cooperating
agencies, is authorized and capable of providing the full range of
the necessary urban services for the site. Finally, the proposed
annexation area is uninhabited, and the annexation is supported by
100 percent property owner consent.
Annexation 88-01
Chronology
February 10, 1988 Annexation 88-01 application
submitted to the City
April 27, 1988 Planning Commission recommending
pre -zone to the City Council
June 1, 1988 City Council adopts Resolution of
Intent to Annex
CITY COUNCIL °STAFF'REPORT
ANNEXATION 88-01 --PULSAR
October 19, 1988 -
Page 2
Annexation 88-01
Chronology
September 7, 1988
City Council adopts Resolution 88-
551 approving Tax Revenue Exchange
bttween the County of San
Bernardino and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga
September 12, 1988
The Board of Supervisors of the
County of San Bernardino approved
the exchange of property tax
revenue.
September 21, 1988
Local Agency Formation Commission
adopts Resolution No, 2166
approving LAFCO 2503, appointing to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducting at'thority, authorized to
proceed. ,
The Coun'il's final action prior to LAFCO's Certificate of
Completion is to order the annexation of the subject described
territory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga through approval of the
attached Resolution.
RQe, lly s tted,
BCer
BB:OP:mlg
:r
e
w�
rr.
r;
?
e RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ANNEXATION 88 -01,
ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS THE AREA GENERALLY
LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE LOGICAL
EXTENSION TO SUMMIT AVENUE, EAST OF THE DEER CREEK
UTILITY CORRIDOR, AND HEST OF THE COUNTY /CITY BOUNDARY,
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKE
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
(i) The Local Agency Formation Commission of San Bernardino County
has reviewed the proposed annexation and on September 21, 1988, adopted
Resolution No. 2166, approving the above - described annexation and authorizing
the City to order the same.
(ii) The territory described in the title of this Resolution is
located within and consistent with the established Sphere of Influence of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and is contiguous to current City limits.
(iii) The annexation of said territory represents a logical
extension of the City's boundaries and urban services.
fiv) The City Council has determined that the annexation of the
property to the City would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City,
in that the property will provide for development, within the District, in a
manner consistent with the City's General Plan and with related development.
(v) Regular County assessment roles are to be used for tax
purposes.
NO Subject property will be taxed for existing bonded indebtedness
or existing contractual obligations with the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(vii) The subject property will be regulated in accordance with the
Low Residential Development Code standards, in addition to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Laws and Ordinances.
(viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred
B RESOLUTION.
NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part °A', of this Resolution are true and
correct.
_CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
ANNEXATION 88 -01' `
October 19, 1988
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1988
m
e
2.
The conducting authority for this proceeding shall be the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
to
3.
The boundaries are approved as set forth in Exhibit 'A'
attached.
AW
4.
The following distinctive short form designation shall be used
i;
throughout this proceeding: LAFCO 2503.
.+
S.
is to proceed wi otut notice, hearing or
herebypgranted
Approval
6.
Included in the City's resolution depicting final action shall
be the detactaent of County Service Area 70 without split of
assests or liabilities.
,tr
7.
Upon effective date of the annexation the territory shall be
withdrawn from County Service Area (CSAS 70.
r;
�
8.
The date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion shall be
'y
the effective date of this annexation.
='
Based upon
the findings and conclusions set forth in this Resolution, this
Council hereby resolved that pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act (Government Code Section 56000), the Territory described in
u
Exhibit 'A' annexed, and directs the City Clerk to transmit a certified copy
'
of this resolution to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission
of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1988
m
e
r
I , e -1-
LEGAL DESCRIPTINON
OF LAND TO BE ANNMCED
TO THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
EXHIBIT "All
Beginning at the intersection of the Southerly line of
the North 40 feet of the Southwest one quarter of Section
29, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Base
and Mardian, according to the official,plat thereof, with
the Easterly line of said Southwest one quarter, thence
Southerly along the Easterly line of said Southwest one
quarter to the Southerly line of said'southweat one quarter;
thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the Easterly
line of the West half of the West half of the East half
of said Southwest one quarter; thence Northerly along
said last mentioned Easterly line to the Northerly line
of the South half of the South half of said Southwest
one quarter; thence Easterly along said Northerly line
to the Westerly line of the East half of the East half of
the said Southwest one quarter; thence Northerly along
said Westerly line to the Southerly line of the Northeast
one quarter of the Southwest one quarter of the Northeast
one quarter of the said Southwest one quarter of Section
29; thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the
Easterly line of the West 330 feet of the East one half
of the said Southwest one quarter of Section 29; thence
Northerly along said last mentioned Easterly line to the
first mentioned Southerly line; thence Easterly along
said first mentioned Southerly line to the Point if
Beginning
jb
r
I
Y�
i
i
1
v l a iu L
east Lint or W"T
e5o petrO•
oP*�'+44 eFC.s�
0117TH Line Op He y4
orawl/44
aorlt a
OF
efYy4 yec.
:Jw 1 /'r
T. J N,
WeST Unt 0 t'ilL
oppt It or 4V4
1011TH Lute Or 941. or
oft OF 4wY4 L1 -�
wYt
or
HOlSTH L1Ht 0
511 y4 500. Z,!;
`ORTH
4
Julau
91'E`a LS i
SEC,.2J
R, S W i
"UT� Line or sNY4
om
/9
U
O
�1
SUMMIT AVE.
a
3
s
3 7vaLE� p.,lgp'
m
AVE.
0
1
L
t
LOCItSAGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
tee FlM sleet, bcmM
tun
. (See 0•a twnWlnq G aieleOlaO, pt•) mR4saa
v
C:
•'
PROPOSAL Rot LAM 2501
HzUUD1O WMI SMMWM ( 21, 1988
t
j
RCSOIATICM NO. 2166
A RRSOLO2I01 OF TsR WCAL A ANCf r0,MMCM CM=SSIOM OF not C001rPY OF
SAY "B"HaRDIIID Mat2MO bedBRIMMUyi01 OM LaFCO 2501
and a av
taec canon • e a Fu • (area generally locat t amen
oL ca extern ens o S t Highland Avenues
along the Clty4
northern boundary).
On notlm of Ctalaiaoer Rragoess, duly «<aodeMd bb�y Connissimer
Grant, am carried, the Local Agency ForRatiaO
aim adopts the
follwing rasolutims
WHEULAS, " Application the
of ben led vwith the fsncctive Officer ofry
this Local Agency rcrmstim Commissim in
accordux o with the Sei��0 j,sReorganization ficr eSi Code
Section at. Beg, And Exacv Officer beesamned said
determining and certifying his tbs .tr said cfilings aare wificient, and,
wlIDtRA4, at the times and in the form and Sumer provided by law,
said Sxegutiva Officer has given notice of hearing
Public by this
[emission upon said application, and,
in-
formation Prepardd Executive ort includheingrhisereecco ®andaliansnthereon.
said filings and report and related fnfOrastlon having been presented
to and considered by this Cnm issionl and,
WHXICIe the public bearing by this Commission was held upon the
date and At the time and piece specified in
said notice of public
hearing and in order or orders continuing such haaringl and,
wIUKRRAS, At such bearing, this Commission heard and received all
oral end written protests, the Commission considered all plans and
propose6 changes of organisation and reorganization, cbjeCtiOns and
evidence which were made, presented, or filed, it received evidence as
to whether the territory is inhabited or uninhabited, Improved or
unimproved, and all Persons
prevent were given an opportunity to hear
and be heard in respect to any matter relating to said application, in
evidence presented at the hearing,
Commls�on of the CCounty of San does ha detemiinnee,ion
hereby
resolve, order, and find as follows,
D4fBR)Rl1ASICNS,
SZMCH 1 The Executive
copies Of this iresolution elu the bmmanneer provieeedcby to
Section 56851 of the government Code.
SRCTICM 2. The proposal is approved sUbiagt to the terms and
conditions bereinafter speclfieds
CORDISIOwS,
condle e o two I-' The conducting authority for thin proceeding
shall t City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1 t)i)
r
RRSOLVIION No. 1166
ZXh b "aa }fi t, ve
The boundaries are apProd as set forth in
signet on s 1T 2"AadThm do-
throughout tOhlisssProocceledingt°CWCD 1501.
notice, ear A°• 'a4 Approval is hereby granted to proceed without
g or a ettion with 1006 landowner consent.
Coot 1 �ro S Included in the City'♦ resolution depicting
final act oa shaZS bi the detachment of County Service Area 70 without
split of assets or liabilities.
1e2 �oj, 6 She date of issuance of the Certificate of
CO'n'let on s 11 %e effective date of this annexation.
SIMOt 3. She conducting authority, L norebv directed to initiate
appropriate proceedings !a cORPllance with this resolutlon and State
law (Govt. Code Section 57000 through 57051).
SRCTION 6. The conducting authority shall not Make any changes in the
boundaries hereby approved nor shall it impose any new conditions or
modify any conditions hereby Samosa: unless and until it recelvos the
approval of the Local Agency formation Commission for such changes,
Section modifications, or conditions, pursuant to the Procedures prescribed in
Section 568_7 of the OovernmsnC Code.
afL=CM 5. Upon cocmlatlon of its pro..ed
aings, the conducting
authority if directed to adopt its own resolution Getting forth its
action relating to the proposal considered and forward the required
formation cCC®issicA"Rise (Govt.ofC de resolution ction 57075 Nrouugha57179).
SSCrrCK S. Upon receAPt of the resolution of the conducting authority
and filed. d said aetSoa,
and !Sla the Certificate of Completion shall be prepared
SZMOK 7. Approval by the local Agency formation Comoission indicates
4PPrcvsl of this proposal by the conducting authority would Accomplish
maxlauapclants Of succeorganization s nimum disruption Of servvicettoathe
[unctions of other local agencies in the area.
SRCTICN B. PPMrNqS. The following findings ere noted In conformance
with Commission policyl
1. The subject 51 5 acres is legally uninhabited. She County
Assessor has determined the assessed value of land to be 2995,903.
The site is within the sphere of influence of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
1. The proposal has not been advertised as permitted by law with 100%
landowner consent.
3 The San Bernardino County General Plu designations and the City
of Rancho Cueaeon0a General Plan designations are generally
consistent, allowing apPrcxfmately 3.5 /DU per net acre. Both
County zoning and City pre - zoning are consistent
6 The City Of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted the environmental
assessment of thin proposal through Its pro- zoning process end has
filed a llegative Declaration which indicates that approval of this
annexation will have a non- signifScaat effa= on the environment.
LAFCO certifies it has reviewed and conslderid the City's
environmental assessment LAFCO Instructs its Clerk to file a
NOtic8 of Determination within five days.
5. Local Agency currently serving the site are listed in the file.
County Service Area 70 and its Improvement zone shall be detached
upon 4nnla3tiOn of the territory. None of the other agenciaa will
be affected by this proposal.
1 _°) /
i
XUTICN NO. 1166
fi. The Citl "B,Plan for -lsinicipol Sorviws Indicates that the City is
able to prcvida,a -full. array of their municipal Bervlcas upon
annsratlon= a� /or'dawlolaent. Water service will continua to be
provided b• the, Cucamonga County water District. Fire protection
services "0111 continue to be provldod by the LOothll) rise
Protoctlom District.- y- r•-
f
7. This innaration will- bemaflt,tha proposal al,'s yp making available
mle)Pal evel "micas a 0111 benefit the City by allowing -the
deunvslopaant nd to occur at City standards.
a. This proposal iid'its anticipated effects do not conflict with
adopted Comission-policies.
9. All notices requfrea or law haw been given. No Protest has been
reealvod.
10. Maps and le7al dasoriptlona moat state standards.,"
11. The City'and County have negotiated the transfer oL ad valorem
texas as required by this Dropnsal. Copies of the resolutions
the San BBernardino County Bond of SSuuppeirvisorss Rancho are on file in the
LArCO office outlining the exchange of revenues.
Tons ACTIdt A"WIm AND) ADOW= by the Local Agemey 1]rfatiom
COssmesioe of tbe'Cewmt7 of man Bernardino by the following "tot
AMISs CCOVA DCK=s Balker, wiling, Riordan, Nragness,
eartolotti, Grant, Taylor
MOY9t CONCE OVEMS Mons'
ABSMMI CCORSSIOMBRir Now
ABSnUt OONIMMo171st Mlkels (Volker voting in his atead)
a a a s a a a a a a a s a a a a a
S1'ATZ Or CALL A )
Condo W QR10
r Or S 2zmok183•
I, JJ'J= M. 31000T, Lxecutive OfL1Cnr of the Local Agency
rormation Comission of the Cuuntr Of Sam Ssrnardino, California, do
hereby certify this record tc be a full, true, and correct copy of the
action taken by said comalssioa by vote of the m mbsra present as the
same appears in the official Minutes of Bald Ccmissioa at Its regular
mooting Of September 11, 1933.
DATtmt September 26, 19aa
� �tivm Officer
3 ��
VA-1
' . • yi
v
;r
r
S
A
02503
Exhibit t ' LEGAL �; LEGAL DE,SCRIPTINON
OF LANG TO BE ANNEXED
TO,TRE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Beginning at the' intersection of the Southerly line`of
�- the North 40 feet'.of.the Southwest one quarter of Section
29, Township 1 North, Range 6 West; San Bernardino Base
and Verdian, according to the official Plat thereof, "with M
'• the Easterly line of said Southwest one quarter, thence
Southerly along the Easterly line of said Southwest one
quarter to the Southerly line of said Southwest one quarter;
thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the Easterly
line of the West half of the West half of the East half
Of said Southwest one quarter; thence Northerly along
said last mentioned Easterly line to the Northerly line
of the South half of the South half of said Southwest
one quarter; thence Easterly along said Northerly line
to the Westerly line of the East half of the East half of
the said Southwest ono quarter; thence Northerly along
paid Westerly line to the Southerly line of the Northeast
one quarter of the Southwest one quarter of the Northeast
one quarter of the said Southwest one quarter of Section
29; thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the
Easterly line of the West 330 feet of the East one half
of the said Southwest one quarter of Section 29; thence
Northerly along said last mentioned Easterly line to the
first mentioned Southerly line; thence Easterly along
said first mentioned Southerly line to the Point of
Beginning.
.� .3
l'
3
s
i.
J
VlbY
_lfl'�11- y��
sullyeKt une {� r�yecst
tall —,
�Ityy�e�w
� 1Nf{:5.
Sins J/4
T. J No
NK
of
1 .1 E4ibit 11D 71
SLIKW T .E.
( ;S '
S�C.29 8 #
Div, e
d
3 fo�w r.kyr
u
*row
♦r `v)
'I -6•f0
T F RA CHO =GA m.
NNEXATION PAP
0 lusift 1 {IM•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA sY
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988 WR
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell'N. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Patrick Price, Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Approvsi to Purchase a John Deere Model S10C Backhoa/Loader
trw Whitney Machinery, Inc. of Riverside, CA, in the
amount of $64,525.38 to be funded by I.G.S. Account No. 72-
4225 -7045
REC0INVATION:
It Johns Deere eMModeld 51100 tooeWh1Ueey Machineryrof0Riverside.a CA, as the
lowest responsible bidder, for the amount of $64,525.38. Th' Purchase to
be funded from I.G.S. Account No. 724225 -7045.
Background /Analysis
At 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday. October S. 1988, bids for the purchase of one
(1) Rubber Tired Wheel Loader/Backhoe were opened in the City Purchasing
Office. Bid; were submitted by Case Power 8 Equipment of Riverside, CA,
Glenn B. Dor.,ing Inc. of Ontario, CA; Whitney Machinery of Riverside, CA;
and Turners Inc. of Ontario, CA. Submittals by Glenn B. Doming Inc. and
Turners Inc. had altered bid specifications as to available horsepower
and criti*cal axle weight capacity. In that these bids are non- responsive
with regard to their inability to provide the minimum requirements in
accordance with the bid specifications, they should be rejected.
The bid received free Whitney Machinery, Inc. is in compliance by meeting
or exceeding the C11}yy specifications on these performance and safety
I tems. After consulting with Finance, it is recommended that a two -year
lease /purchase plan be implemented to acquire this equipment.
Resp Why submitted
R}M:PP•
-Xi'tachment
aw
G
,
�' - { - °ia
; - -` .,�,✓
far �. _rr
�r'�
nZ
L
:-k
October
5,'1988
?,
One (1) Rubber Tired
Wheel Loader Backhoe
>y'
Glenn B. Dorning, Inc.
$49,798.80
-
.d744 E. Holt Blvd.
;Ontario, Ca. 91761
,
'Turners, Inc.
$51,347.46
'5072 Mission Blvd. •.
,Ontario, Ca. 91762
Whitney Mfchinery, Inc.
$64,525.38
P.O. Box 1069
Riverside, Ca 92502
Case Power 6 Equipment
$68,000.00
929 West La Canena Drive
Riverside, Cs 92501
' rl.�
u
i4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT ANA
DATE: October 19, 1988 A-
M Mayor and Members of the City Coundl
FROM Jerry S. FuMoo 1, Director of Resource Services
Sl1d1ECT: Apemyal of rectaacllintlen of Resource Servine Departmnnre Senior nm o
(Alul[V :9nt to AdminLtratWe AneWd ro M �mda.: from -A •nt Nr as •M
Approval of reclassification of Resource Service Department's Senior Office Assistant to
Admintatrattve Analyst to be funded from Account No. 33. 4130-1100.
ANBL)=-
The Rssourco Sorv!ce Departmenbra Senior Otfioe Asststanra lob desedption has grown Into an
AdministratIve Analyst position. Her current responsibilities Includes:
/ Maintenance Contract Administration
2 Equipment, Malertats, and Suppfios Acquisition
3. Computer Maintenance and TMning Administration
4 Statistical Reports
5. Depdremants Budget AAWnfatration
e. Projoct Tracking and Management
Desktop Publishing Administration
B. Data Entry Administration
9 Coordinating projects, tasks and assignments among respective divisions wihin
the Resource Service Department.
Over the next two months she will be assuming even more rosponsib!!lues. Sandy is a real asset
10 the City and to the Resource Service Department.
Sufficient funding Is available In Account No. 33. 4130.1100 for this reclassification.
Respectfully submitted,
Worry ruh�vood'y /�WV+�C�
Dlroctx of Resource Services
JBF:sgr
d
DATE: October 10, Igoe
T01
FROM:
BI's
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jerry B pulwood, Director Of Resource Services
James T Harris, Associate Civil Engineer
RECOMIe[ViDATION,
It is reccamonded that a contract for consultant services for the production of a
city -vide Street Light Inventory be awarded to BSI Consultants, Inc , In the
Amount of $11,780.00 ($13,136 00 plus 101 contingency) to be funded from Lighting
District 81 - 55- 1130 -6028 $1,172 001 Lighting Dls slct 82 - 56 -1130 -6028
91,565 601 Lighting District 83 - 57 -1130 -6028 : ,310 101 Lighting District 81-
58 -1130 -6028 $1,788 80 and Lighting District 85 - 59- 1130 -6028 $313 20
BACAO MID /ANALYSIS
The City Council, at !tea meeting on Jun. 15, 1988, ex.cuted a contract with 85I
Consultants, Inc to provide a city -wide Traffic Control Device Inventory
(1CDII, This Inventory, when completed, will provide the City with A list of the
number, Condition and location of traffic control devices in the City. The
Along to be included are signs, stripes, pavement legends and curb markings
Along with the 1nvantory, a computer and software are to be provided such that
these devices can be monitored, maintained and managed to keep costs and risks to
a minimum and service :0 a maximum.
Not Included with the TCDI wan an
dazired A Inventory of street lights that is alto
conduct A Street eLight yInventoryti BS Consultants,
pro, Inc , su. witted a proposal to
and condition of all street lightesend saLetyrllghtOBAI will pr videCthe location
lights are those lights on wand or Concrete poles and safety lights yerasthose
lights on traffic signal poles In addition to locatlCn and condltlo0, are type
of pole, Size and type of each Illuminating source, non- ot,ndard head ter meet Arm
directions, underground circuits and pcle numbers will be provided to defiae each
street or safety light
D-81
CITY
CDUMCW- STAFF
REPOM��e ;T
BSI CONSULTANTS; INC
October 19,,1988
Page Two
L
BSI will provide the InfcT=tJon,tc the City In- two farms. On City furnished I 06:II,
scale property Ili* maps, BSI will -plot or otherwise Indicate each lightjccaticn°
and will assign a unique Identif Ication number. This number, wLli'tL&.'tCgatber
the cap plotting and the "second, feild,of inf aimtion. BSj? will 'notw.,the I spscif Ica_
of each light an field data sheets.-keyed to-each sup and uni(juo Identification Z
number. These field' data sheets , 'will-be Input iito the PC' c6mputee'databasa, ,
developed as part of tha-,JCDI for later transfer to the•City-'s Prike mini
computer system.
BSI's fee estimate of $13,436.00 seems reasonable for the amount of work
envisioned for a Street Light Inventory In Rancho Cucamonga. They adequately
addressed all issues and requirements of the City showing excellent knowledge and
grasp of the project as they did on their TCDI proposal.,
With the above In mind, hot'% Traffic LiginearLng and Resource Services staff
recommend awarding the work to B_-1 Consultants, Inc., for the amount of
$13.436 00 Plus 101 Contingencies for a total or $14,780.00 to be funded from the
following:
Lighting Dist 81 55-4130-6028 $ 4,172.00
Lighting Dist. 12 56-4130-6028 4,565 60
Lighting Dist 93 57-4130-6028 3,910 40
Lighting Dist. 14 58-4130-6020 1,788 so
Lighting Dist 15 59-4130-6028 343.20
TI-4,780 Do
Respectfully submitted,
Jg , _XU�
Vie-ry B pulwood
Director of Resource Services
JBP,JTH:Jpm
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t ''A
ST_4.FF`REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: 1987/M ENCUNIRANCES
RECD N MDATION:
Council approve the encumbrances from FY 87 -88 and appropriate the funds to
the account as outlined in the report.
BACKGROUND:
During Fiscal Year 1987 -88 (FY 87 -88), -projects were str ced and funds
encumbered to pay for services. At cbe close of FY 87 -88, Invoices and some
services were still outstanding, therefore, the encumbered funds need to be
carried forward and appropriated to the account as detailed on the attached
Encumbrance Detail Report.
Respectfully submitted,
t
Elizabe h Stoddard
Finance Manager
ES:cm
1
k
:i
I
0
31
CARRYOVER
PURCHASE ORDER
-
OLD P.0'S
CARRYOVER BALAKE
'
6130/38
AS Of JUKE 30, 1%8
� ,Account
Ru!ber
OutstaWng P.O. Anonnt
Y'w
01- 4110 -3900
272.48
01- 4124 -1901
783.81
01- 4124 -3900
677.46
�
_
01- 4124 -6028
174.00
01 -4125 -3900
1,343.28
01- 4125 -6028
355.47
01- 4125 -7044
3,000.00
i`
r
01- 4126 -6028
01
2,074.97
-4151 -3900
798.29
01- 4151 -6028
5.025.00
:✓-'
01 -4152 -6028
806.76
,.'
01- 4245 -3900
1,934.23
01- 4245 -6028
18,141.53
01- 4245 -7044
2,558.40
01 -4285 -6028
38,129.49
01- 4313 -3900
753.66
01 -4313 -6028
502.60
01- 4313 -7044
352.34
01- 4333 -3900
3,051.22
01- 4333 -6028
11,373.85
01- 4333 -7044
131.12
01- 4333 -7045
1,749.00
01- 4373 -3900
3,790.30
01- 4373 -3931
1,603.94
01- 4373 -6028
16,107.80
01- 4451 -3900
4,515.16
01- 4451 -3931
4,182.60
01- 4451 -6028
7,769.64
01- 4532 -3900
744.12
O1 -4532 -7044
4,795.03
01- 4637 -3900
1,835.75
01- 4637 -3931
4,444.65
01- 4637 -6028
3,350.39
01- 4638 -3900
3,686.20
01- 4638 -6028
121,298.54
01- 4640 -3900
180.00
01- 4641 -3900
635.58
01- 4641 -6028
50,856.00
01- 4641 -7044
147.00
01- 4647 -3900
17,630.68
01- 4647 -3931
30,900.76
01- 4647 -6027
500.00
01- 4647 -6028
65,418.32
01 -4647 -7043
181,614.19
01- 4647 -7044
34,783.4.4
01- 4647 -7045
35,987.00
31
3a
PURCHASE ORDER
CARRYOVFR BALANCE
AS OF .BRIE 30, 1938
Outstandfna P.O. Apo
70,000,00
171,677.80
246.50
246.50
80,432.00
243.00
42,580.57
25,336.10
6,857.07
73.00
32,012.16
27,848.00
41,415.50
4,391.55
7,624.84
11,946.04
102,580.00
89,458.00
21,575.27
14,478.95
35,393.04
2,197.39
171,840.31
1,783.32
44,419.05
658,088.80
36.375.00
City Council Staff Report
'.:
October 19, 1988
Page 02
CARRYOVER
OLD P.0'S
,,.
6/30,'58
Account Rater
. +o
- r
Gas�T 2106 21075
'x
- 3 ,x09 46 7 6028
09- 4637 -8701
+ w
09- 4637 -8702
09- 4637 -8703
09- 4637 -8780
F
l
Gas Tax 2106
11- 4637 -6028
. +,
11- 4637 -8104
t-
11- 4637 -8113
11 -4637 -8617
SB 325 TDA Ford
- 3 -
12- 4637 -8201
12- 4637 -8605
12- 4637 -8606
12- 4637 -8634
12- 4637 -8706
12- 4637 -8707
12- 4637 -8708
12- 4637 -8709
12- 4637 -8710
12- 4637 -8773
ReereA 3 Serrfces
3 -4 3- W
SB 300
7574r37 -8050
Ped stsir G�rants /Article 3
1b 4637 -8717
FAU Sec. 203
i'7- 6537--8"T
Fac.tivnnda
Orafnabe /E
19-495 WR —
19- 4637 -8766
3a
PURCHASE ORDER
CARRYOVFR BALANCE
AS OF .BRIE 30, 1938
Outstandfna P.O. Apo
70,000,00
171,677.80
246.50
246.50
80,432.00
243.00
42,580.57
25,336.10
6,857.07
73.00
32,012.16
27,848.00
41,415.50
4,391.55
7,624.84
11,946.04
102,580.00
89,458.00
21,575.27
14,478.95
35,393.04
2,197.39
171,840.31
1,783.32
44,419.05
658,088.80
36.375.00
city Council Staf
October 19, 1988
Page t3
CARRYOVER
OLD ►.0'S .-
6/30/88
Account Mber
Beautification
'11- 4641 -d046
21- 4647 -8047
21- 4647 -8135
21- 4647 -8138
21- 4647 -8624
21 -4647 -8718
21- 4647 -8719
21 -4647 -8720
21- 4647 -8723
21- 4647 -8724
S teas Development
2- i aa'1r -8m
22 -4637 -8607
224637 -8608
22- 4637 -8612
22- 4637 -8618
22- 4637 -8625
22- 4637 -8629
22 -4637 -8726
22- 4637 -8727
22- 4637 -8729
22- 4637 -8730
22 -4637 8731
22- 4637 -8732
22- 4637 -8733
22- 4637 -8734
22- 4637 -8735
22- 4637 -8736
23
PURCHASE ORDER
CARFYOVER,BALANCE
AS OF JUNE 30, 1986
Outstandlne P.O. Aawnt
224.00
11,209.25
16,489.75
224.00
224.00
•7783.12
10,266.12
224.00
224.00
1804.88
57.89
23,433.77
4,321.62
516,990.25
2,123.46
50,423.00
25,108.59
1,260.00
245.76
6,364.20
7
115
10
6
.00
.01
.30
.46
.00
:l
o',
0
,r
,r
d�
In P
_,
i
City Council Staff Report
s
October 19, 1988
Page f4
°-
CARKYWi3t
OLD PATS
PURCHASE ORDER
CARRYOVER 8NANCE
6130188
AS OF ,BRIE 30„1988
'
Aceount Raaaber
Outstanding P.O. Awmt
S st�stM DeveloplEnt cent,
-4b37 -8738—
22- 4637 -8739
810.00
6,770.75
22- 4637 -8740
1,386.59
22- 4637 -8741
1,000.00
22- 4637 -8742
107,146.80
22- 4637 -8743
18,997.88
22- 4637 -8744
13,750.00
22- 4637 -8745
127,927.33
22- 4637 -8746
12,666.50
22- 4637 -8747
151,8g04.5g02
22- 4637 -8748
22 -4637- 8760
166.g10:g2
7 76 00
22- 4637 -8752
13,829.54
22 -4637 -8763
47,630.00
22 -4637 -8755
5,830.00
22- 4637 -8756
10,038.00
22- 4637 -0759
13,666.75
22- 4637 -8760
3,996.27
22- 4637 -8801
1,550.00
Oraina a ieilities
23- 4637 -8155
24,494.00
655.79
23- 4637 -0626
1,750.47
23- 4637 -0761
6,974.50
23- 4637 -8762
207,994.30
23- 4637 -8763
56,940.96
23- 4537 -8765
180.00
23- 4637 -8766
305,062.94
23- 4637 -8802
308,933.68
Capital Reserve
25-4285-7043
25- 4285 -8804
3845,525.42
61,767.00
Grant s C08C
233 -8185
17,649.32
28- 4333 -8187
852.31
28- 4333 -8189
45,C11.12
28- 4333 -8704
2,860.00
i
-
:,�'=
MY Council Staff Report
M
October 19, 1988 -
r a'
Page 05
CARRYOVER
ORDER
SOL -
D
CARRCHASE
6/30/66
AS OF JLWE 30, 1966
��
kcornt RaaBer
atscandfna P,O. JVount
�ve a AsOS t
i"
33 -4130 -6028
16,776 11
33- 4130 -7044
3,778.90
°._
r:
Lam lYfnt /1 General City
{�
-r.
130 -6029
40- 4130 -8767
5,694.11
54756,18
IN �1't��ria
f
41- 4130 -6028
62;125,28
EBnd IYtnt 1 3 Rvssoo
32-4 30-602 — 8
165.50
land !lafnt /4 Terra vista
5,353.00
1
43- 4130 -6028
7,401.00
r
Land �afnt. 15 lot lot
k
�f30P- ac2--
447.77
16S
7'4225 3930
53,657.35
AD 88-1 rove nt
-I
0a_
40,461.11
Alta laaa
-43 7 -6028
1,142.75
V AD
82 -1 6th Street Industrial
- - 02
8,757.47
AD 84 Day CV0"liello
Bb_ 63 - O2i T8 —
4,006,452.61
AD 84 -1 Debt Service
- 3 -3 00
500.00
PD-85 Ilerfta e i roveaent
- 3 - 02
264,916.25
PURCILtSE ORDER ,
CARR10vF1t RAUtRCE
AS OF- JWff-r 30, 1966
I
. Q�LSta_d{ pi nL
949,402.72 ,
57,883.47
ME
aT
e �'f
oatobee 19, 1968
L
Page /6•
CdRRTO►ER
.R
r.0's
6/30/6E
P045 Red N111- 1
e
228 -M7•m,.
AD B6 -2 1 re�e t
�4a3i'a—Z.
PURCILtSE ORDER ,
CARR10vF1t RAUtRCE
AS OF- JWff-r 30, 1966
I
. Q�LSta_d{ pi nL
949,402.72 ,
57,883.47
ME
aT
e �'f
CITY Or RANCHO C UCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Ki
:uo
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and city manager
FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance manager ,-
SUBJECT; 1908 -89 BUDGETARY NIEKNW
RECOMMOATION•
Approve and authorize an appropriation from the available °.+nd balance of the
General and IDS Funds for the purchase rf a 1987 Ford Tempo GL from the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
BACKGRnOND:
AS part of the 1988 -89 departmental budget submission, an item was omitted
from the budgetary process. The City wiches to purchase the 1987 Ford Tempo
GL from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
The selling price of the Ford is 412,000. Funding requested is 40% from the
General Fund ($4,800) to be appropriated to acccttnt number 01- 4637 -7045 and
60% from the IGS Fund ($7,200) to be appropriated to account number 72 -4225-
7045.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Stoddard
Finance Manager
ES:cm
. 27 x
w�l■i�
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1938
TO: City Councl'. and City Manager
FROM: Russell N, Magutre, City Engineer
BY: Patrick Price, Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Recomaondation for award of vehicle purchase to Dieterich
InterrALional Truck Sales, Inc. of Colton, CA. in the
Ia1 to -he funded7from Account no.001464� one 4 "a land Metro
RECO PEMDATI0N:
14MsMetroo 11 dVanufsrtom 0 eterrich International TTruck Sales. Inc. (of
Colton, CA, as the lowast responsible bidder, for the amount of
$29,773.36. This purchase to be funded from Account No. 014647 -7045 and
I.G.S.
Background /Analysis
At 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday. September 27, 1988, bid proposals for the
purchase of nine vehi:les were received and opened in the office of the
. The os hisois�doe e of biddi g an any or all of the vehicles listed. lth bid
package were:
One One (1) each 7tPcssengeriNinl -Van
Cne (1) each 8 Passenger Club Van
One (I each Utility Natro Van
One 1 each Compact Utility Vehicle, Four -Wheel Drive
One (1) each Compact Utility Vehicle, Two -Wheal Drive
Two (2) each 3/4 Ten Pickup Truck with Modifications
One (1) each Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup Truck
The bid package instructions included notice that the City would select
received ed by bids as nternationaluTruckdSales. each
lqy Auto Cars, and
Enterprise Chevrolet.
- � r
V
d
i
IL
�9
Award of Vehicle Purchase
`s
Ofeterich International Truck Sales
October 19, 1988
Page 2
Dieterich Intereatfenal, presented a primary bid per specifications of
$33,510.52 for a Metro - Yang -of, the current productioa.'year .•, As -ap
_
alternative bid, they presented an option of a new unit 6in'_`stack, for
y,
$29,773.36, also fn- c*liance,wfth all specifications _ othar- than,cf the
f
current production year.:: Jhe'sum; total lbudgeted.Is fo a' purchase ofAhe
vehicle and equipping: the ,interior .a %:required for" the,�facilities
°a s
maintenance group. - , The savings -,on the vehicle purchase "will offset the
price increases of .the equipment to be added to this vehicle—
Therefore, the lowest responsible, bidder would be Dieterich International
Truck Sales whose proposal meets or exceeds all specifications as set
forth by the City.
Respectfu l�_pbmitted,
Rki:FP :la
Attachment
�9
;,One Utility ►Ifni -Van
J:"`
p�One 7 Passenger Hinl -Van
8 Passenger Club Van
;,One Utility Diesel
#y Metro Van
One Compact Utility
r 10, 4- Ilheel Drive Vehicle.
;One Compact Utility
2 -111jeei Drive Vehicle
�s
Twn 3/4 Ton Diesel Pickups
With Ibdiricationst
One Ilid -Slur Extended Cab
Pickup Truck
Y
VEHICLE 010 SUIOIARV
Septrmber'29, 1988
Ole Are lrir ►n�rrnA I Iona 1. C01.1" Ant0 Cnrt
h uc laics nc.
$13,552.70
$15,041.93
$11,002.43
$29,773.36
7—
Ln Ldr.prJsn UirvraL
$12,766.67
$14,281.23
$17,825.63
$15,63,62.03 $11,673.41
$14,285.09 $13,092.67
$19,4101.59 racl,
$12,390.82 $11,64U.RU
ti
i
m
j
r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 198e Aiti LL
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Patrick Price, Equipeent and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Reco®ondation for Award of Vehicle Purchase to Enterprise
Chevrolet of Upland, CA, in the amount of $66.454.80 for
the purchase of one (1) Utility Hint -Van, one (1) 7
Passenger Mini -Van, one (1) Compact 4 -Wheel Drive Uti11l�yy
Vehicle, one (1) Compact 2 -Wheel Drive Vehicle and one (1)
Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup to be funded from various
accounts.
RECOIKIOATIOM:
It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of: one (1)
Utility Mini -Van, ove (1) 7 Passenger Mfn1 -Van, one (1) Compact Utility
4 -Wheel Drive Vehicle, one (1) Compact Utility 2 -Wheel Drive Vehicle and
one (1) Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup Truck from Enterprise Chevrolet of
Upland, CA, as the lowest responsible bidder, for the amount of
$66,454.80. Vehicle funding as follows:
Vehicle
Util 1`59UFT-Van
7 Passenger Mini -Van
Compact 4 -Wheel Drive Utility
Compact 2 -Wheel Drive Utility
Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup
Background /Analysis
Account Number
01- 4637 -7045 d IGS
01- 4637 -7045 6 IGS
01- 4641 -7045
01- 4333 -7045
At 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 27, 1988, bid proposals for the
purchase of nine vehicles were received and opened in the office of the
City Clerk. The proposals were presented to the vendors with the option
of bidding any or all of the vehicles listed. Listed in the bid package
were:
One (1) each Utility Mini -Van
One (1) each 7 Passenger Mini -Van
One (1) each 8 Passenger Club Van
One (1) each Utility Metro Van
1
'--N: _. :r:� �y�.�.t.s{,�= x.•a.a�
.l 1" 'tiY`.rrfr! dr _ ttvt."i m
fwd of Yehic`ieftrd'se-
Enterprfse 'Chevrolet ,
.`r October 19 `lgb,.%
-Page 2
$' One (1) each Compact utility- Yehfcie, Four -Wheal Drive
one (1) each'Coalatet utfiity_Yehlcle, Two'Wheel Drive
- Two (2) each"3 /< Ten Diasei-rfckup Truck wfth Nodlffcations
One (1) eich,'.tffd- SizejExtended,Cab Pickup Truck
- The bid paekagt +instructions included notice that '10 City uocld select
from the 4ubmltted, bids es individual bids r er each unit. C11ds were
receivid by Dieterich International Truck Sales; Colley Auto Cers, and
Enterprise Chevrolet; _ --
onterpriso Chevrolet submitted bids fer's1x of the specified vehicles.
0! ttose, Enterprise Chevrolet is. the lowest responsible bidder of' five
units, mee^: ng or.exceedfny, all speciflcatfens as set forth by the Cay.
r _
Rospectfil TyAsubaitted,
d d
Attach2ent
I
L
y�-
•R�
3
, A
my
• - `- 1111CLE 010 SU1ltthnt
� Srt,l.rmhnr 7.9, 19011 -
Y'iYrLir.lr. -
Metl•rhh Intrumtlnnnl Cnl try MLLn curt 'i.nlrr prlsn'; e.hry
buck Sales nc.
1-One Utility tltnl -Yan 917,552.70•- 512,766,67
R• '
One 7 Passenger tilnl -Yan 515,041.93 $14,281.23
FOne 0 Passenger Club Yen
$17,002.43 S17,925.C3
;Our 11tlllty Diesel
iletro Van 529,773.36
C"
One Compact Uttlify
4- Ilherl Urlvr VOhlr•I0
Wimp U3
511,671.41 `
IUne Compact Utility
2 -11heel Drive Vehicle
514,205 U9
$U ,1)" h'
lnn 114 Inn Ulosel Plcknps
NI10 til4tfirItlo„sl
iIQ 'fin l.,a Parb
Une I114 -5170 rsleudeA Cal,
Pickup I;ucY
1;7,390.02
SII,rmu.nU
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA=NGA
STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1988
City Council and City Manager
Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer
Patrick Price, Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor
Recomwndation for award of vehicle purchase tc
Cars. Inc. of Glendora. CA, in the amount of $3
toebe�fuunded from Account Mos. 01 ?4647-7045 and
RECONEIMTICY:
It is recoaoended that the Citr ouncfl award the pure
pickups po modifications Colley Cars lowest res^ bidder. or the amount of
purchase of the two pickup trucks to be funded from
4647 -7045 and I.G.S.
Background /Analysis
At 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday. September 27, 1988
purcbase of nine vephicles worm opened in the i
any or allsof the vehclestlisted.� Listed oin th
One (1) each 7LPasengeriMint-Van
One (1) each 8 Passenger Club Van
One (1) each Utility Metro Van
Otte (1) each Compact Utility vehicle, Four-Wheel Drive
One (1) each Compact Utility Vehicle, Two -Wheel Drive
Two 2) each 3/4 Ton Pickup Truck with Modifications
One (1) each Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup Truck
The bid package instructions included notice that the City would select
received by submitted Dieterichid International individual each
Co])ey Auto Lars, and
Enterprise Chevrolet.
,r
■
Award of Vehicle Purchase
Colley Auto Cars, Inc.z
October 19, 1988
Pape 2
Colley Auto Cars presented the only responsive bid for the two codified
diesel 3/4 tan pickup - trucks and the 8 Passenger Club Van. Therefore,
y, this vendor is the lowest responsible - bidder of these units whose
proposal meets or exceeds all specifications as set forth by the City.
It should be noted that the purchase of the 8 Passenger Club Van was
approved in the 1988 -89 RDA Budget Account 10- 51700.
Respectful ly,.aubmitted,
cc: Jack Lan. ACM/CDD
Linda Daniels, Redev. Coordinator
r
,
Y,
m
3
7J
``�c
J
,13
� .` 1� _. �!Y "i
.y'.4�_M.CL,�?S f _••
" _S -�
.t.� .`Jy9 y_ #�
z,
VEHICLE DID SUlU1NtY
,:
rrplrmbFr 29,
1990
a
J�1tir.Ir
UI41•rlrD =tn`r iontlonnI
ILuck Sales Inc
Lolley PortngGit's
lmLr•prlsr LM•vtnt;i
4 +y
Joe Utility flint -Van
$13,552.70
$12,766_.67
e 7 Passenger Rinl -Van
9
$I5,041.93
$14,281.23
'Me 0 Passenger Club Van
$17,0112.43
$17,825.1..
'se Utility Diesel
I!etro Van
$29,773.36
'"e Compact I I t I I i ty
4- 11heel Ulhtr Vnllirle
$IS,662 Ili
$11,671.41
nc Cnmpact Utility
.'2 -Uheel Drive Vehicle
r'•
arm 1/4 Inn Ulesel Pickups
fwtth Ilndiflcatlonsl
nc Rid -Sl7r Fxtel, led Cab
;Pickup hock
$11,285.og $17,"(17.64
Sir, "111.49 rarb
$12,190.112 $11,64U,00
r�
_C\
.Ji
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9 STAFF REPORT
Date: October 19, 1988
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
By: Henry Murakoshl, Asucfste Civil Engineer
Subject: App royal to execute Contract Change Order No. 5 (C.O. 87-
201 for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Greek
and Associates to continue design administration and review
of plans and specifications for the following projects:
19th Street West City Limits for $18,000 (Account No. 22-
4637- 8743), Hermosa /Cartilla for $16,000 (Account No. 29-
4637 8744), $17.000 for Zircon /Amethyst (Account No. 22_
DO to bring the
the Systems Deve
RECCIRENDATION:
It is recomended to execute Contract
and Associates for continuing design
projects: 19th Street Nest
Zircon /Amethyst, 19th /Haven, Bartyan S
Widening.
BACXGROUND /ANALYSIS•
The firm of Don Greek and Associates
studios, project administration and
for (our projects on 19th Street, Al to
Street Bridge Extension, I -15 /Route 66
It is r.ow necessary to expand their
wori:ings encountered: $43,000 for con
$15,000 for scope changes to incur
driteways oa the 19th Street projects;
snd $2,000 for Banyan Street Extensio
iota.' amount of $68,000 to bring the
paid .'row tha Systems Development Fund.
Res iy mltted,
RHN :pam
to
Change Order No. 5 with Don Greek
adminsftration for the following
City Limfts, Hermosa /Cartilla,
treet Extension and Arrow Bridge
was engaged to perform predeslgn
re view of plans and specifications
Loma Assessment District, Banyan
and Arrow Route Bridge Widening.
contract to cover the additional
tinuing the 19th Street projects;
de striping, signing, ramps and
$8,000 for Arrow Bridge W1dening
n. The Change Order is for the
contract total to $130,000 to be
a
,4
,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
October 19, 1988
TO:
Mayor and Members
of the City
Council
FROM:
Jerry B. Fulwood,
Director of
Resource Services
SUBJECT:
Approval- for Reimbursement and Service Agreements
for the Proposed
Assessment
District 89 -1 ILewie
Homes).
RECONdMENDATION: '
Staff recommends that City Council approve the Reimbursement
and Service Agreements in the amount 'of $5,000.00 for.the
proposed Assessment District 89 -1 (Lewis Homes).
BACKGROUND:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received a request from
Lewis Homes to analyze Uie possibility of forming an
assessment district. They are willing to advance funding for
the initial evaluation and feasibility reviews. Lewis Homes
in the future, shall be entitled to a reimbursement
Hawever, if no district is formed, then no reimbursement
shell occur
The approval of the attached Reimbursement and Service
Agreements will allow the advance funding and feasibility
study to commence
The following Service and Reimbursement Agreements are
attached for your review:
1 NOS Lowry ( Assessment Engineer)
2 Lewis Homeb Reimbursement Agreement
;arly ectfulsubmit ed,
B F ulwood
Director of Resource Services
JBF:]m
Attachments
fa
it.
0
CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September'~76, 1988
John Goodman
Lewis Homes Management Corp.
P.O. BOX 670
Upland, CA 91786
REI TERRA VISTA
Dear John Goodman:
Ia Oam Iv q1, ea se 6� OprW 917A DIO f UJJ
The purpose of this letter is to provide an agreement between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Lewis Homes Management Corp.
-Lewis Homes" for the provision by the City through NBS /Lowry
of certain consultant services to be provided on a time and
material basis pertaining to the study of the feasibility of
financing certain public improvements required for the Terra
Vista development through the establishment of either an
assessment district or covmunity facilities district
The City agrees that it shall enter into a separate agreement
with NBS /Lowry to engage NBS /Lowry to conduct certain
feasibility studies on n time and materials basis part:lning
t� the financing of the public improvements for Terra Vista.
Lewis Homes agrees to deposit with the City the amount of
$5,000.00 as an advance to pay for such consultant services
Lewis Homes additionally agrees to forward such additional
monies as may be requested by the City to pay for consultant
services provided by NHS /Lowry in excess of the initial
deposit In the event that inadequate funds are on deposit
with the City to continue the consulting services, all such
services shall be terminated until a deposit is received
adequate to pay for such services.
In the event that either an assessment district or a
community facilities district is formed and bonds %re issued
to finance public improvements for Terra Vista, Levis Homes
shall be entitled to a reimbursement from the bond proceeds
of any monies expended under this Agreement In the event
that no such district is formed or no such bonds are issued,
Lewic Homes shall not bo entitled to reimbursement for any
funds expended pursuant tr this Agreement) provided, however.
the City shall return to Lewis Homes any funds deposited
hereunder and not previously expended or required for the
payment of consultant services provided under this Agreement.
C —
Mw D.bmb N. &m Jdap K&4 av V,
Dmeh LSw Chem J. DAW11 y9 P.1sLWWd La M.Wee,mm
-
Y.'rs -a1� +' � `rS .Y• �..Y r -� map. a.",".. ��k34'.y <'4rY`_i.: �. - e- m�Ire?ee{•.!ef� -1« :. I @S' +S'�.v�'M1'?VT^a'9i. Y'v�iX
paitymay_;terminate this Agreement- at-, anjr- tuns byt
yYry gii'ngr3 %day prior written notice to the
yotherparty.
This le�cbOnititntas the- entire "Agr�emset betveapi the
r
.-
"
city 6f'X4cho.Cueamonga and Levis Homes pertaining'_'to ; tibsf
provision ° -bf' "•consulting services for such!>'Zeasibilitp-
•
studies. '
This Agreement shall become affective When accepted by Levis
Homes by executing and returning tho original of this letter
to the undersigned.
CITY or RAHcHo cuchm m
THIS AGREEMENT IS ACCEPTED BY LEWIS HGMZS.
LEWIS HOMES WAMAdOAvvr Gott
Bye
Dat Y 9- .20-81
887- 011.003
PROFESSIONAL SLRVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this
dry of , 1988, between the City of Rancho
C. amonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to
as •CITY ") and NBS /Lowry, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as
'CONSULTANT-).
A. Recitals.
(1) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform
profossional services necessary to render advice
and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission,
City Council and staff in the preliminary study of
public financing for public improvements in
connection with the proposed Terra Vista project
(•Project• hereafer).
(ii) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to
perform such services and is willing to perform
such professional services as hereinafter defined.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and
CONSULTANT as follows:
B. Agreement.
I. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply
to thu following terms, except where the context of
this Agreement other'•ise requirese
(a) Pry ect: The preliminary study of public
financing of public improvements for the Terra
Vista project, described In Exhibit W, Lcope of
Services hereto, including, but not limited to, the
-1 15/
r7
preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and
'documents, the presentation, both oral and in
writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and
'documents to CITY as required and attendance at any
and all work sessions, public hearings and other
meetings condseted by CITY with respect to the
project as outlined in the Scope of Services.
(b) Services, Such professional services as are
necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to
complete the project, as described in Exhibit "A ".
(c) Completion of Protect: The data of completion
Of all phases of the project, including any and all
procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan
documents, technical reports, meetings, oral
presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at
public hearings regarding the Project is set forth
in Exhibit "8", Project Schedule, attached hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and
corap73te the project in accordance with Exhibit "A'
an' applicable with Federal, State and CITY
statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines,
ali to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. -
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps,
surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter
collactivoly referred to as "documents ") including
all supplemental tochnical documents, as described
in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the tine specified in
Project Schedule, Exhibit "B". Copies of the
documents shall be in such numbers as are required
by Exhibit "A ". CT_TY may thereafter review and
forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said
-2-
�a
documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such
1,17
ravinions
to said
documents as
are deemed
necessary.
CITY shall
receive revised
documents in
'
such form
and in
the quantities
determined
necessary
by CITY.
The tame limits set for
k
pure-ant to this Section s2. (b) may
be extended
s
upon a written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost
and expenbe, secure and hire such other persons as
may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to
comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the
event any such other persons are retained by
CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such
persons shall be fully qualified to perform
services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further
agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by
CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval
of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows%
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $5,000 for
the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum
shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct
and indirect coats or fees, including the work of employees,
consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to
CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the
schedule set forth in Exhibit "CO.
(b) payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY
in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a
monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within 30
calendar days after said invoices are received by CITY. All
charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C• either with respect
to hourly ratee or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In
no event, however, will said invoices exceed 95♦ of
-3- 3
'S
individual tack totals described in Exhibit "C ', except as
Provided in subparagraph (c) immediately following.
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event,' .hall
CITY ba required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum ir, excess of
95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by
CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental
technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form
and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later
than 60 days after presentation of final documents and
acceptance thereof by CITY.
H (d) Additional services: Payments for additional
services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in
the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof,
w shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the
C' fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "D ". Charges for
additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly Lr.&Ja and
J
shall be paid by CITY within 30 calendar days a.ter said
invoices are received by CITY.
4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in
Exhibit "A" hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps
and other information, if available, whirh CONSULTANT
considers necessary in order to complete the project.
(c) Such Information as is generally available
from CITY files applicable to the project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining
information from other governmental agencies and /or private
_4_
5 ( •2i
r
}! parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to
.a make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such
}
information.
a
S•
5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and
reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement
shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment
for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and
i, other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by
4 CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such
;I copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may
desire.
Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except
at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the
plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized
agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT
shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to
hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all
damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising
out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at
another site by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents.
6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by
CITY upon the giving of a written •Notice of Termination" to
CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of
termination specified in said Notice. In tho event this
Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated
at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as se-t forth in
Exhibit "D", on a pro -rata basis with respect to the
percentage of the project completed as of the date of
termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive
more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (it), above.
CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and
reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by
-5- �
F CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not
it
terminate this Agreement except for cause.
t
{a
7. Notices and Designated Representatives Any and
all notices, demands, invoices and written communications
between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in
this Paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore,
shall be those persons primarily responsible for the
performance by the parties under this Agreemont:
CONSULTANT
Richard A. Busermann,
Vice President
NBS /Lowry,
P 0. Box 8121
San Bernardino, CA 92412
(714) 988 -1401
CITY
Jerry Pulwood,
Director of Resource Services
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P O Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
17141 989 -1851
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written
communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been
received by the addressee forty -eight 1481 hours after
deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid
and properly addressed as not forth abovo.
8 Insurance, CONSULTANT shall neither commence work
under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance
required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to
CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence
work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the
subcontractor has been obtained CONSULTANT shall take out
and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement
the following policies of insurances
(a) worker's Compensation Insurances Before
beginning work, CONSULTANT rhall furnish to CITY a
certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full
workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may
-6-/
v'.Z!
�A
�4�
s
J
employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the
work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the
State of California.
In accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall
secure the payment of compensation to his employees.
CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with
CITY a certification as follows:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700
of the Labor Code which require every employe-* to be insured
against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake
self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that
Code, and I will comply with ouch provisions before
commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement ".
(b) Public Liability and Property Damage:
Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole
coat and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept,
in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and
CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public
liability and automobile insurance against claims and
liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage
arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of
at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily
injury or death to anyone person or for any one accident or
occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00)
for property damage.
(c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take
out and maintain at all times during the life of this
Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning
errors and omissions ("malpractice ") providing protection of
at least $1,500,000 for errors and omissions ( "malpractice")
with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT
performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY.
_7_
57
0
s (d) General Insurance Requirementst All insurance
required by express, provision of this Agreement shall be
carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to
do business in the State of California and policies required
Zunder paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional
Lnaurede CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees,
and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the
' extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer,
�7
insured and all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation
a against CITY and CITY 'e elected officials, officers,
employees, and agents; (2) the policies ar-t primary and
ps noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by
CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed
except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY
by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies
of all such liciee
po promptly upon receipt of them, or
certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect
for its own account insurance not required under this
Agreement.
9. Indemnifications CONSULTANT shall defend,
indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed
officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability
from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including
the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal coats and
attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent
or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT
in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not
limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent
permitted by law.
10. Assignments No assignment of this Agreement or of
any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be
made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the
prior written consent of CITY.
-S-
SK
M
�3' ,r p • ���� °wiYw: �'FY C'v '� A "d..✓- .`�ii�4u:�e -�` ^,k° r -y : r+' i.4' "•.
11. Indif ple dnt Contractors The parties hereto agree
that CQX`MiNT,: and, °it■ employers, officers and agents ;are
- .
independent coatracfoa under this Agreement and'ahall'lrlo aot be
eonstrued-for any purpose to ba employees of CITY.
L
12. Ciwernina Law: This Agreement shall be governed, by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California.
13. Attornav'e Pees: In t`:e event any legal proeeedtng
is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the
Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding
shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from
the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be
reasonable.
:• 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any
and all other ag•.•eements, either oral or in writing, between
the parties with reapect to the subject matter herein. Each
party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation
by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other
agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this
Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of
this Agreement shall 'be effective only if it is in writing
4
signed by all parties.
-9-
,
e
IN WITNSBS WBEREOP, the parties hereto have executed
this Agreesnt as of the day and year first set forth above:
C/ONSSOLTANTt NBS /I.OWRY
VICE PRESIDENT Date
CITY OF RAN, °O CUCAMONGA
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Date
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
-10-
00
EXHIBIT •A•
SCOPE OF SERVICES
#,
0
Meet with proponents and City staff as required.
kr,t
0
Coordinate with financial consultant, tax rate
rv�
consultant, underwriter, bond counsel, Foothill Fire
17�
Protection District and City staff as required.
a
,r
0
Identify public improvements to be considered for
e�
funding by Mello -Roos Community Facility District and /or
Assessment District financing.
';
0
Estimate areas of benefit for the various probable
_
public improvements to be financed.
0
Estimate total amount to be financed.
0
Describe feasible methods of determining and levying
special taxes and /or assessments.
iry
iln
e �
EXHIBIT 'Bo
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The work described in Exhibit •A• shall be completed within
90 calendar drys unless extended by mutual agreement. o!
12 6C;)L
EXHIBIT •C`
'SCHEDULE OP ESTIMATED FEES
Basic Services - services shall be billed monthly on a time
end materials basis ilk accordance with Exhibit •D•, not to
exceed $51000.
Additional Services - Reimbursement at hourly rates per
Exhibit 'D'.
-13- (
i'
� 71
i
t
i
Z
}
• EXHIBIT "D"
/����
76.00
ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
76.00
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BUIJNG RATES
. . . . . .
A Effective, July 1, 1988
62.70
ORIRt
31.00
tI
31.00
Senior Principal Consultant
47.00
princi consultant . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11015!.•000 0
pal . .
Senior Principal tn410aet . . . . . . . .
72.00
.
Principal engineer . . . . . • . • . . . . . •
76.00
Assistant, engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
71.00
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7enior in r .
64.00
77.00
r . . .t
eaglaeer . . . . . . . .
Ccgltlesr . .
42 00
Assa . . . . .
Assistant tistant [agianc ...
4A .S0
PLAMNIft0
76.00
Principal Planner, . • . . • • • . • • . • . . . • •
72.00
Assistant Principal Planner . . . . . . . .
61.00
Senior Planner . . . . . . . . . . . . .
71.00
Planaet
Pluer�
tn
47.00
Assoclate
Resistant Planner . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44.70
OtSION Ado DsAPTm
93.00
Senior Designer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •
!1.00
Designer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$3.00
Senior Orator . . . . . . . . . . . .
17.00
Drafter II . . . . • . . . . . . • . .
11.00
Drafter O • . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . • . .
11.00
Delineator . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . .
taglneetinq Aide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26.00
r2tft)e
CONSTLOCTICN )WAOtitm
76.00
Principal engineer . .
76.00
senior Ilaaideat engineer . . . . . • . e • .
. . . . . .
Senlor ?an' act sepreeentative•
62.70
Resident Cngineet
31.00
Project Representative . . . . . .
31.00
Associate Proleot Saprotent+tive . . . . . . .
47.00
Senior Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.60't'DLtect Salary
Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.60 s Direct Salary
SoPVtyI140
71.00
Principal Surveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
62.00
Assistant Principal Surveyor . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
Supervising Suzvvyoc
37.30
Survey Crew with tflaipaent
2. io•: Diiwe 7alary
Travel Time - (when in excess of eight hours
wrk time per dry( . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
1.40 z Direct Salary
32AV1CLS AND ZXP&43ZSs
Computer. Central Processing Unit (CPO) . . . . .
. . . . . 1SC /Second
COMect Time, pat Maur . . . .
10.00
Ielatin9 • • • • •
1.50/100 - •roes
Statage (1000 characters)• . . . . . .
. . . . . 450/Month
Minlaum
25.00
Computer Analyst
71 00
Progtamur
3].00
42.00
Technician
11.00
.•searcher /PCOC6asgr . . . . .
SoCrttery
. . . . . .
33.00
executive and Administrative . . . .
. . . . . .
0oca entry . .
• .
31.00
21.00
Secretary/Clark
Coat
Li -house Reproduction . . . . . . . .
24C /M11e
Milsage . . . . . . .
•
Cost
subsistence .
Other expenses - ln;ludlnq 6pecial Consultants
136
and Purchased Services through Suhcourtacts . .
. . . . . Cost •
6101p vtee tnctude ave sad, mdoo Mf. Ipeal fvnrt/ etc. that
btmnq lutes ere subject to
inrmf0 nU y"' Ow to U.1,, IOMeenfl and help (nQeares•
A lot@ pevmcnf PINAMCC CNAACf WN be Walled to env woad belence.
• /ter tM
ca-~91b q thirty tfat My'
sees of the angmaynrmce at the ee�•ew} .n Mretl nb u4-N oY lw•
&too 1 /� -(7L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Date: October 19, 1968
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer
Subject: Approve and execute Professional Services Agreement with
J.F. Davidson for the Master Plan Beautification Study for
Haven Avenue and Base Line Road, to be funded by
Beautification Funds it the total amount of $42,000 as
$16,000
Real) and $26,000 f ,000 ffrromcAccount oNo. 2144647- 8724s(Haven
Avenue).
RECOMMEMPATToM:
Approve and execute Professional Services Agreement with S.F. Davidson
for the Master Plan Beautification Study for Haven Avenue and Base Line
Road, to be funded by Beautification Funds in the total amount of $42,000
as follows: $16,000 from Account No. 21- 4647 -8047 (Base Line Road? .nd
526,000 from Account No. 21 -4647 -8724 (Haven Avenue).
BACKGROUW /AYALYSIS•
The Engineering Staff has recently terminated the contract with an
architectural fine for failure to perform, who were working an 2 of 6 of
the Master Plan Beautification Studies presently in process of design,
namely Haven Avenue Parkways and Base Line Road Parkways.
The fine of J.F. Davidson, Inc. have been assisting staff for the last 6
months on review of the 6 ongoing studies and have prepared some 'fast
track" designs for the City as were needed. After negotiations
concerning time schedules for completion of the studies and finished
product documents, it was determined that the firm of J.F. Davidson, Inc.
could provide a "fast track' product in conformance with the City's
guidelines. The completed study for Haven Parkways should be ready for
final approval in 10 weeks and for Base Line Road Parkways in 14 weeks,
from date of the Notice to Proceed.
The attached agreements are the result of the stated negotiations and are
submitted for approval and execution.
Respec Y) s mitted,
RHM:JLH:pam
�5—
01
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAASONGA
STAFF, REPORT
,c
DATE:
October 19, 1988
TO:
City Council, and City Manager
FROM:
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY:
Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer '
SUBJECT:
Execute contract for the City Corporation Yard, Phase I,
base Bid 'A' including alternate
4 deduction Improvement
Project located at 9153 Ninth
Street awarded to Lucky
Construction Coxpany for the
mount of S2,20L%000
($2,098,C00 plus 55 contingency)
to be funded from Capital
Reserve, Account No. 25 -4205 -7043.
RECOINEwATIoN:
It is recommended that City Ceunctl authorize the Mayor and City Clerk "to
execute Improvement Project LBdocuments e d 'A' Including ater Corporation deductioonn3eand
authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $2,200,000,
($2.098,000 plus 5% contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve,
Account No. 24- 4285 -7043.
Background /Analysis
On Septezber 7, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Lucky
Construction Company. Staff has received from Lucky Construction,
revviieved executed found contract documents. o pletesanddin insurance ce withnthe
contract proposal.
WRespe 119) subm�itte�d,�
cc: Purchasing
tifk e
i
b
1
0
RECOM "TIOM:
It is -.=commended that City Council authorize the mayor and City Clerk to
execute the contract documents for the Ninth Street Rehabilitation
Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director
to expend 2120,330.00, ($109,388.65 plus 10% contingency) to be funded
from Gas Tax Account No. 09- 4637 -8815.
Background /Analysis
On September 21, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Gentry
Brothers, Inc. Staff hcs received from Gentry Brothers, Inc., executed
contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and
found them to he complete and in accordance with the contract proposal.
Respect�l . su9mtd,
RHm:J 'j
OF RANCHO CUCAI,IONGAt' -?+
9ry
Y
' STAFF REPORT
ii•
:V.
u
l�
!
V
r,
DATE:
October 19. ,988
TO:
city Council and City manager
r
;RON:
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY:
Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
Execute contract for the Ninth Street Rehabilitation
Improveaent Project between Vineyard Avenue and Baker
Avenue awarded to Gentry Brothers, Inc. for the aaount of
No. 0354637L8815nq ) to be funded
from Gas Tax(Fund,Account plus
RECOM "TIOM:
It is -.=commended that City Council authorize the mayor and City Clerk to
execute the contract documents for the Ninth Street Rehabilitation
Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director
to expend 2120,330.00, ($109,388.65 plus 10% contingency) to be funded
from Gas Tax Account No. 09- 4637 -8815.
Background /Analysis
On September 21, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Gentry
Brothers, Inc. Staff hcs received from Gentry Brothers, Inc., executed
contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and
found them to he complete and in accordance with the contract proposal.
Respect�l . su9mtd,
RHm:J 'j
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Richard L. Alcorn
SUBJECT: RENEIiAL OF THE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
I. R -- reEi�aTIOoN.Cont act Servl�cesdwith the county ofCouncil San Bernardino
to provide weed abatement programs and the removal of non-
combustible junk and salvage material for a period of five (5)
years.
II.
BACKGROU: The City of Rancho
County Department �of Agriculture nttocprovide fire
haza�d weed agreement wilt be ccooncludedias of Decpember 31, five 1988. yyears. This
This cortract service is currently administrated by the Planning the
Division, , Code by nCity office.
staff, havelaconsistently� received
immediate attention. This responsiveness has been assisted by a
cooperative working relationship between City staff and the County
Hazard Abatement Officers.
Routine abatement of weeds, tumbleweeds and combustible debris on
property within the City is achieved through two (2) yearly
programs. Beginning in April and August of each fear, the Hazard
Abatement Officer surveys all properties to determine if hazardous
conditions exist. Subsequently, notices are sent to property
owners requesting abatement. If removal of weeds and other
combustibles does not occur, the County contracts with outside
firms to provide clean -up and abatement.
III. ANALYSIS: The new Agreement is essentially the same as for the
prey ous five (5) year period. The total cost for the prograv
shall not exceed $12,50 per year. The actual sum will be based a.�
the total indirect program costs, less any surplus fees
owner and, s necessary. assessedato� that property ts aelien pheld
by the County.
P O
■
L%
Renewal ofiAgreement-witb County
of San Bernardino; for -Weed- Abatement Services
Ocfuber 19; 1988-1 = fit= ;6 - -��
l3y,• Page 2 • -.,W„ ° : >1 �, "�:'�
This new agreement does differ from the previous one by the
addition of abatement authority for non - combustible junk and y
salvage. This change will allow the County td °include removal of
wa non - combustible, materials which impede the 'effective abatement of
�• fire hazards within the City. In addition, once the City adopts a
!Y`. Nuisance Abatement Ordinance, conditions which have been processed
i for abatement action by the City can'be referred to the County for
F,• completion through this Agreement. The County will use their
k regular abatement Procedure to obtain bids, assign a Contract,
carry costs initially, and then assess the property to recover
costs.
t, This additional provision is not anticipated to increase program
o-. costs. The County will utilize this provision only in conjunction
with Fire Hazard Abatement which Is, normally performed, unless the
City directs them to abate a Nton -Fire Hazard Nuisance.
r Iv. CONCLUSION: The existing agreement and weed abatement program have
ve
pron a an effective means of mitigating fire hazards on
' vacant and developing property within the City at a nominal cost.
,t. The program has been used as + resource by the Code Enforcement
staff in resolving violations. The addition of provisions f -jr non-
combustible items will give the program even greater value.
Until such time as the quantity of vacant and developing properties
diminishes, the County Need Abatement Program is a cost effective
end comprehensive way to deal with fire hazards and nuisances
present in Rancho Cucamonga.
Ale 11 1t s ner
BB:RA:ns
Attachments: Previous Agreement - Contract CO -83 -30
New Agreement
. -,.. � � -- .rte" .,, _:.. +:ems } �'"• "-
AGnta}1eRS
2 �-
e ) THIS AGnCV1Z1AT, is node and entered into this .Trt4
a day of and is by and between r-uunty
5 Of San Bernardino, a Aolitical subdivision of the State of
6 California, hereinafter referred to as COUtiTY, and the City of
7 Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred
a to 29 RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
9 NITItP.9H¢TH t
10 wN¢R¢Ae, COUNTY is currently csrryiiq Out a weed
11 abatement program under t-he authority of San Bernardino County
12 Code Section 37.031 at seq., and this program In being Conducted
11 in the County service Area No. 701 imvrcvemsnt Zone A, by the
IA County Agricultural COtmLASIOner, and
15 t1HBReAB, RANCHO CUCA110NOA is situated nsar to said
pis 16 County Service Area No. 70 and is presented with wood abatement
.a�S
17 tasks similar to those at COUNTY, and is empowered to carry out
tie is woad abatement programs, and
•c��„� 19 IOICR¢AS, each of the parties to this agroemen- desires
20 I that a unified, Joint program be put in °°oration to beat
.1'1 a 21 proosea utth wood abatement In the territories oi each of these
Z2 parties,
21 HON, 7HCRCFOPt, it is agreed and covanantid by the
24 unlarsignad public entities e/ follwet
2S 1. The County Agricultural Commissioner shall conduct
26 an Jonas- weed abatement Pro
grsm in the territorial linits of
27 the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to provisions o! tP�i
70 Gan Bernardino ouney , an rules, and ragulatione, and
29 condltlona agreed to by COUNTY and RANCHO CUCAMONGA toj its
10 territory. The conditions shal be as follows,
11 a. COUNTY wi11 not be responsible for cl_ea4ing
At tvt 32 cased/ along roadsides or alleys within the city boundaries of
7: •g2
37 RANCHO GA coreann This service will be ne -0 Y R -NOO
71 CUCAMONGA osreonnel,
35 b. PAW110 CUCAMONGA-nwned property will be
16 treated as private property and billed separately•lrtae this
-1. 70 - —
3
I
1 agreement.
2 a. The sbatsnart service lee will be based on
] t'fe fatal indirect grogram coat• los Any surplus fees over the
1 dirsc! croOtr df abatement,
S 2. In cnnsideration for the oarformanco of paragraph
6 1 above, oertaining to territory at RANCHO CUCAHnNCA, RANCHO
B Flva Hundred 7 CUCAH an shall pay to COUNTY a sum not to exceed Waive Thousand
ted Dol l:. re I41+ 500 00) or v
s. The actual sum wi•11
9 be determined by the Agricultural Commissioner pursuant to the
10 computation as Proved by paragraph 1 a., b., and C. above, who
11 will than p:uvide the City of Rancho CucaMGnga with said computati
22 along with the reggeA-t_fot.paymOnt_ thereof. '_ RANCHO CUCAMONCA
13 shall then Send "payment eo the Agr�turral Canai_eo!_oner.
II The F!vment shall be In two portions.
15 The first portion ahall
be dug and pall 'within the brat al;t months of eat cantroat
pC' 16 Year, and Shall be In the Amount of one -halt of the maximum
17 am mentioned in lhSs paragraph. My balance due or adjustment
.�.. la at the and of the contract year shall be paid at Se end of the
S m: 19 wntract year. -- - - P— -
Z�`1'. 20 3. T)lif agreement shall remain in Lull farce and
'a 21 Offset from year to year, unless terminated, for a Period of
2i f.ve (5) yearn. It may be terminated by either party hereto
23 upon written notice delivered prior to January 1, of any year.
21 HOCK• to COUNTY Shall be to the Clark of the Board at
25 Supervisors. Notica to RANCHO CUCANONGA shall be to the City
26 Clerk, City Of Rancho Cunamon;a.
27 1. COUNTY shall submit to RANCHO CUCAMONGA
28 than January 1, of each . not Ater
a
29 this agreement, which May be,In the amount sot 012•SOO.00l per
? for
30 year.or higher. It no new sun L so
Jl oravlow eery Coiling by COUNTY the
Y v Ceiling sum shall be applicable for the On24inq
,AClvk 32 year, RANCHO CUCIUIONC* shall have sixty days in which to rejsct
,2 -29 -0233 such new sum and terminate this agreement. Otherwise, this
71 I.graement shall be in feel. force and Offset With the designated
�5 ceiling sum applicable. However, as always, thO
36 . . . . actual sum for
-2. 7/
1
I
r
1
r
i
1
1
will W determined by the Agricultural Commissioner as
1 e
each ys•r w
3 s
stated In P
P•r +9r•ph 2 •vows.
� 3
3 A
ATTZs.r1 I
I COVK:'Y Or tAN BLRNARDINCI
4 A
AIMIM- DIBNA40ON, Clerk Of Q O
the nunrd o
O
L S
S
6 By iYtN
4. 7
" ATTPSTI
10 CITY CLERK „
11
r 13 P .�
+• 1)
't.. 16 "PRown A6 To ''ORR
iy f� 16 Date$
17 AtAN R. t4 M5
+ County Counesl
Tits 16
zr4� if BY
's[ii 10
6Y 31
31
23
24
33
36
37
30
29
30
31
PA.IvR )2
rV -83 33
36
3S
36
. ,. C: • rilh,.
Board of supervisors JUN 06 M3
CITY Or RARC110 CUCAI•7NGA
^ "Appme D'Am To n7a..
Petal
City AttorneY. City of A90CM
Cuc monge
7�)-
a
1
i
i Q
t �s
81a
�j
A G R A R N F I N T
3 THIS AGREEMENT, 18 made and entered Into this day
4 Of 1488, and is by and between COUNTY Op
5 SAN BERNARDINO, a political subdivision of the State of Callfor-
6 nia, hereinafter referred to as -COUNTY., and the CITY OF RANCHO
7 CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
S 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA ".
9
10 WITNESSETHr
it
12 WHEREAS, COUNTY is currently carrying out a weed abate -
13 ment Program under the authority of San Bernardino County Code S
14 23.031 et seq., and this program Is being conducted in the County
15 Service Area No. 70, Improvement Zone A, by the County AgsICUl-
16 tural Commissioner, and
17 WHEREAS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA in situated near to said
t8 County Service Area No. 70 and Is presented with weed abatement
19 tasks similar to those of COUNTY, and is empowered to carry out
20 weed abatement programs, and also might have within its incorpor-
21 ated territory some private property P Y upon which there may be
22 accumulated non - combustible junk and salvage material in illegal
23 open storage, and,
24 WHEREAS, each of the parties to this Agreement desires
25 that a unified, joint program be put In operation to best proceed
26 with weed abatement in the territories of each of these parties,
27 and In the RANCHO CUCAMONGA incorporated territory, the occasion -
28 al abatement by removal of illegal open storage of non- combust-
29 able junk and salvage,
30 NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed and covenanted by the
31 undersigned public entities as followse
32 1. The County Agricultural Commissioner shall conduct
33 an annual weed abatement program, and abatement of illegal non -
54 combustible junk and salvage in open Storage, as determined
35 necessary by both of these contracting parties, in the territor-
36 Sal limits of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, pursuant to provi-
,�,.,.,., -73
Y
s
a8 s
I
1 sions of the San Bernardino County Code, and rules, and regula-
2 tions, and conditions agreed to by COUNTY and RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3 for its territory. The conditions shall be as follows:
4 a. COUNTY will not be responsible for cleaning
5 weeds along roadsides or alleys within the city
6 boundaries of RANCHO CUCAMONGA. This service will
7 be performed by RANCHO CUCAMONGA personnel.
8 b. RANCHO CUCAMONGA -owned property will be treated
9 as private property and billed separately from this
10 Agreement.
11 c. The abatement service fees will be based on the
12 total indirect program costs less any surplus fees
13 over the direct costs of abatement.
14 2. In consideration for the performance of paragraph 1
IS above, pertaining to territory of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RANCHO CUCA-
16 MONGA shall pay to COUNTY a sum not to exceed Twelve Thousand
17 Rive Hundred Dollars ($12,500) per year. The actual sum will be
18 determined by the Argicultural Commissioner pursuant to the com-
19 putation as provided by paragraphs 1 a., b., and c., above, who
20 I will then provide the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA with said computa-
21 tions along with the request for payment thereof. RANCHO CUCA-
22 MONGA shall then send such payment to the Agricultural Commis -
23 1 stoner. The payment shall be In two (2) portions. The first
24 portion shall be due and paid within the first six (6) months of
25 each contract year, and shall be in the amount of one -half (1/2)
26 of the maximum sum mentioned in this paragraph. Any balance due
27 or adjustment at the end of the contract year shall be
paid at
28
the end of the contract year.
29 3. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
30 from year to year, unless terminated, for a period of five (5)
31 years. It may be terminated by either party hereto upon written
32 notice delivered prior to January 1 of any year. Notice to
33 COUNTY shall be to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Notice
34 to RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall be to the City Clerk, CITY OF RANCHO
35 CUCAMONGA.
36 4. COUNTY shall submit to RANCHO CUCAMONGA# not later
uummi...rull 7 2 I .:
tt
Y
all
11J
°u
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2S
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
tp
than January 1 of each year, a proposed new sum as a ceiling for
this Agreement, which may be in the amoung of Twelve Thousand
Five Hundred Dollars (S12,S00) per year, or higher. IfIno nei,
sum is so proposed by COUNTY, the previous year's coiling sun'
shall be applicable for the ensuing year. RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall
have sixty (60) days in which to reject such new sum and termi-
nate this Agreement. Otherwise, this Agreement shall be in full
force and effect with the designated ceiling sum applicable.
However, as always, the actual sum for each year will be deter-
mined by the Agricultural Commissioner as stated In paragraph 2,
above.
DATED:
ATTEST:
MARTHA M. SCUDDER, Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors
By:
Deputy
DATED:
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALAN K. MARKS
County Counsel
By:
PA L A. GRUBE, JR
Deputy County Cou sel
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By
JOHN JOYNER, Cha rman
Board of Supervisors
By:
_ 7� -3-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
y:
41
.:
' - -'E .��1� ye=y s_':,C; � 1 ti" r_ ;.`•�tt :'w 71`J
CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA '
STAFF REPORT
October 19; 1968
City Council and City Xanager
FFROX:
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
Dave 8levins, Xaintenance Superintendent
Execute contract for Design of the Red Hill Park Lake and
Amphitheater
DSurveyors,
ers/Land Inc. for the amount Linville
(514,800 10%
plus a contingency) to be funded from Capital
Reserve fund Account No. 254285 -7043
RECCMIEt MTI0H: ty ed the I Is Agreement w�ithndLinville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors foridesign oficRed
Hill Park Lake and AWhitheater drainage improvements and authorize the
Xyyor and City Clerk to execute said agreement. Project to be funded
from Capital Reserve Fund, Account :lo. 254285 -7043.
BAW3P7UND /ANALYSIS
Previous Council action awarded the design of the above reference project
to Linville Civil Engfneers/Land Surveyors of Rancho Cucamonga. The
contract documents are submitted to Council at this time for approval and
execution.
Rasp t submitted,
J
RHH:D8:Ia
Attachment
.t
•1 .
a
f
?;;gym'. r � �� -n,�•y ;+n. �'{
CITY OF RANCHO rUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer
BT: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of an Agreement for Postponement of Recordation
of Declaration of Restrictions for Tract 13271, located o�
the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken
Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Company
REC09OWT10M
It is recommended that City Council adopt Vhe attached resolution
approving the subject agreement for Tract 13271 and authorizing the City
Clerk to cause same to record.
Analysis/Background
Tract 13271, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and
Milliken Avenue, was approved by the City Council on September 7,
1988. The developer, Lewis Development Company, is submitting an
Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Declara on of Restrictions
until occupancy.
Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clark's office.
Respec 71 O tted, `
i `{
RIIM:LB.
Attachments
M ,
74?
RESOLUTION NO.
V.
A RESOLIffION OF THE-,CITY,COI,'NCIL OF-THE CITY OF RANCHO
Ali
CUCAMONGA., CALIFORNIA, APPROVIRG AM AGREEME0 FOR
POSTPONEMENT OF RECORDATION OF DECLARATION OF
RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT 13271
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements, as a prorejuisite to approval of
building permits for Tract 13271, the Lewis
subdivider of said tract,
Development Company, has submitted an Agreement for Postponement of
Recordation of Restrictions; and
WHEREAS, said agreeKnt wets the requirement of the Plann;ng
Comfssfon conditions and a declaration of restrictions will be recorded prior
to obtaining occupancy.
NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLVMXGA,
CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESCLVES as follows:
1. That said agreement be and the saw is approved and
the Mayor Is authorized to execute saw on behalf of
said City and the City Clark is authorized to attest
thereto and and cause same to be recorded upon said
execution.
74?
ti
i,
V
e
a
a
BASF "HE ROAD
rY � ®Q
"reRRA Vu7'A "Axw"
C �V
CITE' OF rML.
RANCHO CUCAIIONGA Mn rR ,sz„
ENGMEMMG DrMON EXEM31D
7F
CITY OF RANCHO CMAMONGA
STAFF REPORT"
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
and Street Liyhttng Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Parcel
MoD 11341, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and
Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Co.
RECGIENMTIOY
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
orderinggtherannexMation13to , Landscappe Maintena cecDlst ctmNo. 4dand Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the
City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record.
ANALYSIS/BACKGRUUNO
Parcel Map 11341, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and
Milliken Avenue, in the Mospftal Development District, was approved by the
Planning Commission or. March 9, 1988, for the division of 11.61 acres into 1
parcel.
The Developer, Lewis Development Co., is submitting an agreement and security
to guarantee the construction of the off -site 4pprovements in the following
amounts:
Traffic Signal Master Planned Church Street
Foothill and Storm Drain Milliken to
Milliken Line 6 Orchard
Faithful Performance $110,000.00 $180,000.00 $302,000.00
Labor and Material $ 55,000.00 $ 90.000.00 $151,000.00
Monumentation S 2,450.00 N/A N/A
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's
Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County
Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation fore signed by the
Oeveloper is on file in the Cfty Clerk's office.
Respec J.d13q submitted,
/YY i
RH4
Ltr
Attachmiu
86
Y'
:$mss` ' }�'�Y`��- f.� ° x=•K� i wi`"r.v -. til, -: �''' -•�y�i �:��
U '�C+
F
p V
RESOLUTION NO.
'
A RESOLUTION OF,THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
ye
CUCANGNOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUIB:R 11341,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL'•W' NO. 11341), - IlPROYEMEW: AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY'
,
WHEREAS, Tentative ,Parcel Map No: `11341, s6mitted by Lewis`'
Development Co., and consisting „of L- parcel, located on the southeast corner
9
of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, being'# division of a portion-of, Parcels
1 and 2 of Parcel Nap 7267 per. map 'recorded'in Book 78, pages 43 and 44 of ,
Parcel Maps in the office of the COUntj- Recorder or San Bernard;ro County,
State of California, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City -of,'
Rancho Cucamonga on March 9, 1988; and ,
WHEREAS. Parcel vep No. 11341 is the final map of the division of
lan,i approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map;and
WHEREAS, all of 'the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the'City Council of said City have now been met
by entry into an Improvement Agreement Ouarantted by acceptable Improvement
Security by Lewis a velopment Co. as developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BT IT RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security
submitted ly said &velope° be and the same are hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereoy authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement
on behalf of th3 City of ancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest; and
that said Parcel Map No. 11341 be and the saw is hereby approved aM the C1,-
Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be Ailed for
record.
U '�C+
F
,-o
RESOLUTION N0. 7 8 �I q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAW)GA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING T4E ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 4 FOR PARCEL NAP 11341
WHEREAS, the City"Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously finned a special maintenance district pursuant to
the art 2 of °the`Streetsdand HighwaysLCgde`iof the Statelof Califgrnta.ssaidl5,
special maintenance districts known and designated as Landscape Mhintenance
Maintenance Districct No.i4h(heereinaifterareferried to`as °the 'Matntenanceighttng
District'); and
WHEREAS, gtghe provisions of Article 2 of Ctapter 2 of the
terrttorying and
ane MalntengnAct of District; and orize the annexation of additional
WHEREAS, at this time the City COU-1cil is desirous to take attached
proceedings
ncorporated herein xby`�this refer`rencedrtoethe Maintenance District, end `0 and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
,,p be annexed to the Maintenance Of strict have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's 'Report'.
NOW. THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are ail true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
described inrExhibitOB attached Exhibit
hereto and
to the Maintenance mDistrict.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including 198 lery of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
ASSESSMENT ir DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
•.I
S.�is�W Y CITY Of RANCHO CUCA1[ONGA w
COUNTY Ot 8AN BWARDWO
=: STATII OF CAI.U�ORNIA
IT - --
-
S.�is�W Y CITY Of RANCHO CUCA1[ONGA w
COUNTY Ot 8AN BWARDWO
=: STATII OF CAI.U�ORNIA
IT - --
v
EXHIBIT 08'
PROJECT NAME PARCEL MAP 11341
NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 1 pcl: 11.61 acres NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 23 units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of La s to be Annexed
10,UU0 22,000
District No.
1 - -- 10 10 ___
4
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
District No.
4
Turf
Street Name Sq. ft.
Milliken Avenue Median
Church Street Median
Parkways
Ground Cover Trees
Se, ft. Ea.
7,115
5,395
69
e'
•:7
,- �rM
i
y
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreements and improvement
Security and Ordering the Annezatirn to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 2 for Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13850, located at the
southwest corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue,
submitted by M. J. Brock and Sons
RECON OMTIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
app?*oving Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, accepting the subject agreements
ana security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.
1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said cups
to record.
ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND
Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, located at the southwest corner of Banyan
Street and Milliken Avenue, in the Low Medium Development District, were
approved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 1987, for the division
of 65 acres into 232 lots.
The Developer, M. J. Brock and Sons, is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the
following amounts:
STORM DRAIN
TR 13748 TP 13748 TR 13857 TR 13858
Faithful Performance Bond: $1,665,000 $106,000 $ 94,000 $ 98,000
Labor and Material Bond: $ 832,000 S 53,000 S 47,000 $ 49,000
Monumentation N/A S 7,550 S 5,900 $ 5,450
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's
Office.
Staff Report
October 19 1988
Tracts 13748, 13857 6 13858
Pa,e 2
Letters of approval 'ave been received Water District' C C.&R.'sehwnalao
schoolppdistricts and .ucamon9a County Consent and Waiver to Annexation
form signd by by the City Developer tis on silo in the City Clerk's office. roved
ResyestfollY spbmttted,.
FM:LB:dAA:lso
Attachments
RESOLUTION N0, p 9 - 015—
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREFIENTS
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13711;,
13851 AND 13858
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13718, consistlny of 232
lots, submitted by M. J. Brock and Sons, Subdivider, located at the southwest
corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, has been submitted to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for appproval by said City as provided in
the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the
require ments of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS. to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the
Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said
City, together with good and sufficient Iaroveaent Security, and submits for
approval said Final Nap offering for dedication for street and highway
purposes the streets delineated thereon.
NON. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWA,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute sane on
behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to
attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to fury and content
thereof by the City Attorney; and
3. Thot the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf
of said City.
57
RESOLUTION MO.
(_ a
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO a
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPEAIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT FOR TRACT MOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
ereviously forced a special maintenance district pursuant to the teras of the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19720, being Division 15, Part 2 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance
district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District
No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance Dlstrfct'); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to
annex the pro perty described on Exhibit 'A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory propposed to be
annexed to the Maintenance Dtstrict have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineers "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the
pDroper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in
Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
incEuTl gibe evy oflalitassessments. shall bth plicablecto ttherterritory
annexed hereunder.
EMIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
Banyan SI
Lots 5861
Lot A, Tra<
Lot A. Lot 32
Lot 33, Tract
interior Street 1......,.
klAken Ave Parkway:
Wken Ave Median
Banyan Sl Parkway
Lot A. lots 32 6 33 Trod 13748•
Lot A. Traci 13857•
Lcts9.11 TmcI I3857-
Lots 58 61, Tract 13858:
'POA' Y^ CIW OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
c COUNTY OF ux BERNARDIN0
STATE Of CALITORNIA
V,
N
Ave. Parkway
1, Tract 13857
Ave. Median
Tract
I89
19920 s 1.
24,089 s t..�
24,224 s 1.
as
•
13.292 sl.
as
8,443 s 1.
14.66811.
134
1 S.14 &L
1.320 s 1.
10.42411.
85
2.760x1.
11.133af
101
'POA' Y^ CIW OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
c COUNTY OF ux BERNARDIN0
STATE Of CALITORNIA
V,
N
Ave. Parkway
1, Tract 13857
Ave. Median
Tract
E)MIBIT 'B'
PROJECT NAME TRACTS 13748, 13857 AND 13858
NO. OF O.U. OR ACREAGE: 232 NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 232
STREET LIGHTING K41KTEMKE DISTRICT
No.
of
to be Annexed
4
District No.
ti
J_
1 --- 15
---
- --
1
2 90 - --
-•-
- --
--
a
-
a•
4
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Turf
Ground Cover
Trees
District No. Street Name
Sq. ft.
So. ft.
Ea.
1 Milliken Ave. PkW.
19,920
24,089
89
Milliken Ave. Median
12,000
12,224
85
Banyan St. Pkwy.
---
13,292
85
Lot A, Lots 32 -33,
Tract 13748
6,443
14,668
134
Lot A Tract 13857
- --
1,524
..
Lots 9 -11, Tract 13657
1,320
10,424
85
Lots 58-61, Tract 13858
2,760
11,133
101
Interior Streets
-
—_
523
Total
47;m
-7rW
1
A
7
5�
x4.,.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
and Street Lighting t Maintenance Dist ictn;osanleands2rfor Tract
13728, located on the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and
Hillside Road, submitted by Hillside /Sapphire Venture
tECON 30ATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
theroannexation to 7L Landscape Mainttenan Maintenance subject
District Hoot iand
and Street Lightinordering
Clerketonsign said agreement and to �cau a saldomaapito recorMdtyor and the City
AHALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Tract 13728, located on the northwest corner of Sapphire Street and Hillside
Planning Co ®tssicn own NcvsetbPrt25, 1987,oforntheidivision of 20 acresdlntots4
lots.
The Developer, Hillside /Sapphire Venture, 1s submitting n agreement and to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the
following anounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $713,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $356,000.00
itonmmtentation: S 4,100.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary
school districts and Cucamonga County Mater District. C.C. d R.'s have also
been appproved by the City Attorney. The Consent and ,Waiver to Annexatla; form
signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk a office.
Resyei y submitted,
�%, I _
RH(J LB:,IAA� --�
�r r
Attachments
9�
I
j�.
s
a
■
the
RESOLUTION NO.
3
_ Yrr
A RESOLUTION , OF•THE- CITY,COUMCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,
CUCAMONGA` CALIFORNIA; = APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREElENT,
IIPROVENEWSECURITY.- AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT M0. -13728
.t,,
• LiH
the - Tentative Map of Tract No. 13728;' consisting of: 34tlots,
lstde /Sapphfre venture, Subdivider„ located atlthe,narthwast
re Street and Hillside,Road has been'submftted to the'City of
by'soid Subdivider for apppproval by said City as providedain
Map Act'of the•State'ofrCaiifornia, and in compliance with°the
Ordinance No. 28xof said City; and G,
to awetr•thC *uirerents established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Hipp of•atid Tract said Subdfvider has offered the,
Improvement Agremntr submitted herawfth- for`approval and execution "by safd
City, together with good and sufficient improvement Security, and submits for
approval said Firral Hap offering for dedfcation•for street and highM
purposes the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, T1ERL -ORE, THE CITY COUNCIL 0'r THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: ,
1. lhat said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mwyor is authorized to execute sass
on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to approval as to fort and
content thereof by the City Attorney; and
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on
behalf of said City.
K,
.y
G�
i
1
V
RESOLUTION N0, b 8 — � 1 8
A R7.SOLUTIOW OF Th'E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHOIM,A, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITOFY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI'7RICT NOS. 1 AND 2
FOR TRACT 13720
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously fetid a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terns of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance districts Known and destgnaled as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District'); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
' Landscoping and Lighting &t of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional
territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and
Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of properly within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District hsve filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice ani hearing cr
filing of an Engineer's 'Report'.
HOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the abo s recitals are all true and correct.
SECTICH 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
of the proper es shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as
described to Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3. Thdt all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including ihRTvy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
q3
ASSESSMHNTIt DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
CITY OF &WHO CUCAVONOA A
COUNTY OF SAN B1rit2iA1tDWo
N
�, STATE 01 CAtVORNSA
`
mae1T •e•
PROJECT NAME TRACT 13728
NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 34 lots N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 34 units
STREET LIGHTING K41NTENANCE DISTRICT
District No. No. of I.— to be Annexed
1
2 8 --_ --- ---
i
L4NDSCAPE MAINTEKWE DISTRICT
Ofstrfct No. Street Nave Turf Ground Cover Trees
So. ft. Sa. ft. Ea.
I Sapphire Street
5,150 27
i
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
A= `F
MMI
October 19, 1988
City Council and City Manager
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Parcel
Map 9897, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and
Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by Lewis Development Co.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving Parcel Map 9897, accepting the subject agreement and security,
ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the
City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record.
ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND
Parcel Map 9897, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra
Vista Parka~], in the Planned Community Office Park Development District, was
approved by the Planning Commission on December 10, 1986, for the division of
14.93 acres into 1 parcel.
The Developer, Lewis Development Co., is submitting an agreement and security
to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following
amounts:
. m�i ITI
LOCATION PERFORW%K E LABOR A MATERIAL
Elm Ave. Nest (Town Center
S 90,000
$ 45,000
Dr. to Church St.)
Tom Center Dr. (Haven Ave.
274,000
137,000
to Spruce Ave.)
Terra Vista Pkwy Nest
103,000
51,500
(Tom Center Dr. to Church St.)
MPSO Line 1 -3
144,000
72,000
Terra Vista Tc%m Center
to Terra Vista Business Park
Church St. (Terra Vista Pkwy.
407,600
7.03,800
Nest to Elm Ave.)
91,
- e.Y'i �.H� ±�f` -�.w. fib^:• �.tn. - °:u
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT,t:
PM 9897 Lewis Development Co.
October 19, 1988
Page Two
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval, has been received froo the County Water Oistrict.__C:C. 8
R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to
Annexation farm signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respq¢kfgfi9� submitted,
R161: Ldy
Attachments
r
?Y
q7
tee- r
. i
F
�i
RESOLUTION NO. $ 8 - &' 9
A RESOLUTION OF iNE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROYING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9897,
(TENTATIVE FARCEL NAP NO. 9897), INPROVFIENT AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
NHFREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 9897, s
Development Co., and consisting of 1 parcel, locat
of Church Street and Terra vista Parkway, being a
Lot 1, as shown on Tract Number 2202, in the City
of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map
Maps, pages 67 and 67 1/2, to the offica of the Co
Bernardino County and that section 1. Township 1 S
Bernardino Meridian, as shown on Cucamonga Fruit L,
as per Map Recorded in book 4 of Maps, Page 9, in
Recorder said County, was approved by the Planning
Rancho Cucamonga on December 10, 1986; and
by Lewis
southeast corner
of a portion of
Cucamongs, County
In Book 34 of
rder of San
ge 7 Nest San
ny's subdivision,
e of the County
on of the City of
MnEREAS, Parcel Nap No. 98-7 is the final map of the division of land
approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Nap; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map
offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon.
NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the saw is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on
behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to
attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Secuetty is accepted as good and
sufftcient, subject to approval as to torn and content
thereof by the City Attorney; and
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating samo be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute thf certificate thereon on behalf
of said City.
�'4-r
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION OF'THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ,''CALIFORNIA;.ORDERING THE AINiEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MD. 4 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AMID 4 FOR
PARCEL MAP 9897'
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; California, has
Qreviously foremd a special Ju fntenance district pursuant-to . the terms -of the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19728; being Oivision IS, Part 2 of,the
Streets and Highways Code of the -State of California, said special mafntenance
district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District
No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the •Maintenance 0lstrtct }); and -
WV,EREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and
Lig9hting Act of 1972• authorize the annexation of additional territory to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to
annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and Incorporated
herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be
annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of ar. Engineer's 'Report'.
NON, THEREFGAE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtONGA HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the
properTy -as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described in
Exhibit 08' attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,- -
1nc u ng a levy of all assessments, shall bo applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
i
- 99
BXFIIBIS 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
«sue
1 k6
�m
CM Ot ROCHO CUCkWOMOA
COUNTY Ol► BB,N MNARDINO
N
E)DIIBIT 830
PROJECT NAME PARCEL VIP 9897
NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 1 pcl: 14.93 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 30 units
No. of Le s to be Annexed
District No.
14 •18 1
-'-
h.
1
4
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Turf Ground Cover Trees
District No. Street Nave Sq. ft. S4. ft. Ea.
4 136
n
t
WL
ma§ ,
r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONG/t.
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto-�—
VBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract
13353, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and
Archibald Avenue, submitted by ALM Limited Partners
RECOM MATIOM
It is reccmmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract 13353 were approved by
the City Council on October 8, 1987, in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: $296,000
Labor and Material Bond: $148,000
The developer, ALH Limited Partners, is requesting approval of a 12 -month
extension on safd improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement
Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Resppeect submitted,
RHM•SMG :sd
Attachments
l0--)-
'ice
- ill 7
„- `- RESOLUTION No. — �p
wiv
,M
A RESOLUTION OF THE'CITY- COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCFMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVENENT-AGREEMENT
EMNSION AND IMPROVD ENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13353
WHEREAS, the City Couril'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,.`
execuUd on October 19, i988, by•ALH Limited Partners as' developer; for the
improvement of public right -of =way adjacent to the real property, specifically'
described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of 19th
Street and Archibald Avenue:,and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agremnt and subject -to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 13353; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agrement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and
said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby'approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
/o3
i
b
`i
y.
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City llinageo
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13542 -1,
located on the south side of Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue,
submitteO by Grigsby Development
MMOMPEMBATIOW
It is recommended that the City Council idopt the attached resolu'cion,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGRDUWD
off the�off- siteeiprovnementtssroforr Tract 13542 -1wer* approved by�sthacCity
Council on September 17, 1987, in the following amounts.
Street Hfilside Storm Drain
Faithful Performance Bond: $866,000.07 $437,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $433,000.00 $218,500.00
The developer, Grigsby Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respe tfuu submitted,
RHM'SMG:,i
Attachments
ley
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT im
MMOMPEMBATIOW
It is recommended that the City Council idopt the attached resolu'cion,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGRDUWD
off the�off- siteeiprovnementtssroforr Tract 13542 -1wer* approved by�sthacCity
Council on September 17, 1987, in the following amounts.
Street Hfilside Storm Drain
Faithful Performance Bond: $866,000.07 $437,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $433,000.00 $218,500.00
The developer, Grigsby Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respe tfuu submitted,
RHM'SMG:,i
Attachments
ley
r,{ !} ._•: - '°�„' -„'cc �.y..c^*. + -t i.. _ <_ ;.,4s w:#vd�- c..,.i: •' �.c..�ki
' NESOLURION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C04NCIVOF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA;' CALIFORNIA ;•APPROVING'IMPROVEMEIIT AGREEMENT
OMNSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13542 -1 V_
NNEREAS, the City Council of,,the City oCRancho;Cucamonga. a
California, has for,its consfdaratfon an Improvement Agree wt Extension; s'
executed on October;19;11988; by Grigsby' Development 'as- developer;.for -the
Improvement of public.rtght- of -wqy :adjacent to the real "property;speciftcally
described therein, and generally located on the south side of Nilsmi Avenue at
Canistel Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 13542 -1; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extenston and
said 119 rovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
�-r
=.S
/OS }'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "
STAFF REPORTT _
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectc`42_T
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13542 -2
Storm Drain, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue at
Cantstel Avenue, submitted by Grigsby Development
RECOMMEWOATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
AWALTSIS/BACKGROUNO
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the off -site improvements for Tract 13542 -2 Storm Drain, were approved by
the City Council on September 17, 1987, in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: $131,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: f 65,500.00
The developer, Grigsby Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Resi bmitted,
RNM.N$1G�
Attachments
A
RESOLUTION No. 93 0-3
A REML6011 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMIDVGA,- CALIFORNIA, APPROVING,INPRoVDW AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13542-2
STORM DRAIN
WHEREAS. the City Council of the,City of,Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for ift 'onsfderatfon an Improvement Agreement Extension,
executed on October I- 1988.- by Grfgsby-Developwnt.as�developer.',for thil
improvement of public r1ght-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the south side of Wilson Avenue at
Canfstel Avnue; and
WHEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done In
cOnJuXtfon with the development of said Tract 13542-2 Storm Drain; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension Is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of
Rancho Cucamonga. California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and
said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
mo
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk w attest thereto.
W:
M".
-- C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT'
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manger
FROM: Russell H. Xaguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec
SUNECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract
10414, locxted on Ridgeview Avanue north of Hillside Road,
submitted by Greg Lundeen
RECOONDDAT`ON
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Moyer Ind City Clerk.to sign said agreement.
AHALYSISIBAC.:GROUHO
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract M414 were approved by
the City Council an September 17, 1968, in the folluwing amounts.
Faithful performance Wnd: $322,500
Labor and Material Bond: 5161,250
The developer, Greg Lundeen, is requesting approval of a 12 -month
extension on said Improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement
Agreement E:taasian ale available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfrgsubmltt:d,
h
RHM: .s.� }�
Attachments
■
i fi�Tr
n
a' RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHORGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEw.dT AGkEENENr
EXTENSION AND 1WROYEIENT SECURITY FOR 'rAACT 10413
1
." WHEREAS, the City Council of the MY of Rancho-Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
t executed on October 19, 1988, by Greg Lundeem as developer, for the
improvement of public right- of -%MY. adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally - located on Ridgeview Avenue, north of
F Hillside Road; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement aNd'subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
;y conjunction with the development of said Tract 10414; and
<< WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and
acccspanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
w in said Improvemnt Agreement Extension.
Rancho Cuccaammonga. Callifornia, thatOsaid Improvement Agrreeeeme not fExtension and
said improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Hoar is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
Ike City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
l
Y
3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ip
DATE: October 19, 1988 STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13057,
located on the south side of Highland Avenue betwe.n Fairmont
Avenue and Deer Creek, submitted Dy Fieldstone Company
RECQlE"TION
It is accepting t�subjectaagreeme City
extension) andosecurity attached
s dcautho resolution, ithe
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security tc guarantee the construction
of the oft -site improvments for Tract 13057 were approved by the City Council
on October 8, 1987, in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: $460,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $230,000.00
The Nveloper, Fieldstone Cowpagy, is requesting approval of a 12 -month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respe PtY submitted,
RHl�G:jmb 1�
Attachments
//o
J I
RESOLUTION No,
A RES06JTIoN 'OF i1'1k'CIT_Y,' COUNCIL OF-THE CM,cF,RANCHO
CUCAMOm1A$ CALIFORNIA.•APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENS11 IN AND, IMPROVEMENT- SECURITY FOR T -7
AACT.1302
_P
WHEREAS." the citV' Coi6cM of-im'City "f
California. has.for its, Q -,Rancho Cucamonga,-�
Consideration an loprovement.Agre*mnt,Exte�----,;
executed on C�6 nsfon,,
=ber'19,-'Igffi; by-Fieldstone Company- as developer,_for�the,
improvement of publJc,rfqht_of_w&y'&djAcent�to , 'ealzpropeHighland
the �jiffcally
described therein and general IY-locat4d'on the Souith'side-of
between Fairmont and DeWCreek:
f6enue, and _�.Avenue
WHEREAS, the Installation of such 'improvements, desckbedln' said
Improvement Agreement and'subject to th&-terms
thereof, Is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 130S7; and
WHEREAS. said Improvement Agreement Extension Is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement
Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and
said Improvement Security be and the Sam are hereby approved and the Mayor Is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamw.ga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
L__ r-
i
t
t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Yorks Inspectorz
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 13022
East, 13022 Hest, 13022 Major Stress, located on the west side
of Milliken Avenue between Fairmont Avenue and Victoria Park
Lane, submitted by William Lyon roepbny
� , 73 7- --
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City clerk to sign said agreement.
AHALYSIS/BACKGRDUWD
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the off -site improvements for Tracts 13022 East, 13022 West, 13022 Major
Streets were approved by the City Council on June 19, 1986, in the following
amounts.
13022
13022 East 13022 West Major Streets
Faithful Performance Bond: $606,000.00 $420,000.00 $1,296,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $303,000.00 $210,000.00 $ 648,000.00
The developer, William Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 12 -month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Cierk's Office.
Respec ull- "ubmitted,
RHN:SIIG:- ----r
Attachments
RSOLUTION R0.
A RESOLUTION OF -,7hE CIMCOUNCiL OF THE CITY,OF RANCHO
N
CUCAN ".'CALIFORNIA,-APPROYIh6 1WROVDEKr AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IIPROYDIM SECURITY FOR TRACTS 13022 FAST,
13022 NEST,;13022 MAJOR STREETS
WHEREAS, the- Ci•ty,Council' of tha•C1ty,of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has far 1ts'constderatton an"laprovement „Agreement Extension
executed or, October 19,-19M;-by by Nflllaw Lyon- Capagy,as developer;_for the
iwprdvewnt of public right= of- way'adjacent -to- the ;real property specifically
described therein, and generally located,on. the we3t stde.of- Milliken- Avenue
between Fairmont Avenue and Yfetcria Park,, Cane; and Y
*MREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done to
conjunction with the development of said Tracts 13022 East, 13022 Nest, 13022
Major Streets; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreeaart Extension 1s securod and
accompanied by good and sufficient-Improvement Security, which 1s identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreemont Extension and
said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hertby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
113
N
a
r�
0
iTY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1908
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Inprovement Agreement and Improvement -tmrlty for
Parcel Map 9350, located on the northeast come- of Base Line
Road and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The W11;1r Lyon Company
RECOHNENDATI06
It is recommended that ttti City Council adopt the attached resolutions
accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and
the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS /BACKGROOMD
Parcel Map 9350, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and
Milliken Avenue, was approved by the City Council on April 16, 1988.
The Developer, The William Lyon Company, is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of off -site ift)rovements, required an
the Improvement Certificate of the subject rap, in the following amounts:
Street
Storm Drain Storm Drain Improvements
Infrastructure Base Lire Infrastructure
Faithful Performance Bond: $502,515.00 $616,155.00 $385,131.00
.abor and Material Bond: $251,2sa.00 $308,078.00 6:42,566.00.
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's
Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water
District.
Respecjf07y submitted,
Attachments
s
RESOLUTION NO. <R S — G 2 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVENENT
AGREEIENT AND IMPP.OVElENT SECURITY,FOR PARCEL MAP 9350
WHEREAS, Parcel Nap No. 9350, submitteA by The William Lyon Company,
was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho C.,,C& oga on March 15,
1980; and
WHEREAS, to meet the repuirements,established on thefIwprovement
Certificate of the final map of said City, have now been met by entry into an
Improvement Agreement'Quarantmed by acceptable Improvement Security by The
Lyon Company as developer.
NOW, THEREFORE „BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorised to sign said Improvement Agreement
on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest.
F}}
T-
1°
z
K
a
CITY OF RANCHO CI1CA3tONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988 MJG
TO: City Council and City Mansger
FROM: Russell II. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, for
Tract 10210, located on the north side of Almond Avenue, west of
Sapphire Street, submitted by Nordic Development Company, a
General Partner of Skyline I, Ltd. and release of Improvement
Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by City Council an
September 4, 1985, submitted by Forecast Mortgage Company
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and
the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to release the agreement and
security accepted by City Council on September 4, 1985.
ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND
Tract 10210, located on the north side of Almond Avenue, west of Sapphire
Street, was approved by the City Council on September 4, 1985.
The Developer, Nordic Development Company a General Partner of Skyline I,
Ltd., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construc' on of
the off -site improvements in the following amounts:
Tract 10210
Faithful Performance Bond: $557,700.00
Labor and Material Bond: $278,850.00
The above mentioned security replaces the security
September 4, 1985, from Forecast iortpage. C
security are available In the City Clerk s Office.
Respectfuliy submitted,
RNMtLB•JAA:Jddr"
Attachments
Almond Interce t
anne
$587,400.00
$293,700.00
accepted by City Council on
opies of the agreement and
it
RESOLUTION NO. s p 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. 'APPROVING INPRDYEMENT AGREEMENT,
ANO,INPROYEIENT SECURiTY'FOR- TRACT`NOj 10210 AND
RELEASING THE- IMPROYE)ENT AGREEMENT ik SECURITY
PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED
LL• WHEREAS, Tract No., 10210. located on the north side oP_Alswnd Avenue,
west of Sapphire Street was upproved by City Council on September4, 1985; and
ie _ t
WHEREAS, Nordic Development Company, a General Partner of Skyllrie'I,
Ltd.. has offered the Iaprovement.Agreemant submitted herewith for approval
and execution by said
City.,together with
good fficlent Improvement Securt
Security. I mp rovement ,Agreemnt.and,Improvement
Security. replaces
Improvement Agreeawnt and Improvement Security accepted at the City Council
i' meeting of September 4. 1985.
t- ,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDNOA,
* HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
*' 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the some 1s
approved and the Nyyor is authortzed to execute same
on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to approval as to fora and
content thereof by the City Attorney; and
i 3. That the Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security accepted at the City Council meeting of
September 4, 1985 is hereby released.
r,
/17 x •.x'
��.:�•_
� ` -'y "i�..i �-". .° yx.:;?'r:'?:'
'` -
-' :`�'r -- :jar
Q
0
J J '
•t t,, �I
a
- ICO
vP
• �� i ,.
'�
• �• +• � fit$ S
_`�
i �''��•d i l�� • �
tai lS /
^,
i
i• i
��•t
-
•
P t wl1.� n• { i
x [
o \u0
�Na
o
rAPP"l FEE
_
STREET
ZDe
.i
Y
r;
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA r, "- 5
STAFF REPORT -• V
DATE: October 19, 1988 zW-7G
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Release Faithful Performance Bond and accept reduced bond to
replace original for Tract 12642, 12935 -44 Major Streets, located
on the east side of Milliken Avnue north of Highland Avenue,
submitted by Kaufman and Broad
RECONNEWATIOM
It 1: recommended that City Council release the Faithful Performance Bond in
the amount of $2,076,000.00 and accept a bond to replace it in the amount of
$207,600.00 for Tract 12642, 12935 -44 Major Streets.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
The required street improvements for Tract 12642, 12935 -44 major streets have
been completed. However, the green belt areas, which are bonted separately,
are not acceptable at this Liss. Reconstruction of some of the drsfns may be
necessrry, which will affect the completed Improvements. Therefore, It 1s
recommended that City Council not accept the improvements at this time, accept
a new bond in the amount of $207,600.00 and release the original bond in the
Faaithful of PerforrmanceO Bond andceitedsufficient the boto col er many effect
improvementts
disturbed until the improvements are accepted by Council.
Developer: Kaufman and Broad
11601 Wilshire Blvd., 11th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90325
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $2,076,000.00
Accept: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 207,600.00
Respec utlylsubmftted,
RffM:SMG:
fro
■
w : e. - ..'_J; °.�;pt,,.. ±:- ±y� >:.ki - :-mow a..... _ - . -. -� -y w= -• y _
CITY OF R ANCHO CUCAMONGA �+
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988 &-&
TO: City Council and City Manager WN
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto --
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
RECOMMENDATION:
The required street improvements for Tract 12621 have been completed in
an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said
ta9roveaants accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of
316,900, aut�ertze the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
authorize to City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the
amount of $169,000.
Background /Analysts
Tract 12621 - located on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Madrone
Avenue and Baker Avenue
DEVELOPER: Macleod Development
2 North Lakb Avenue, Suite 670
Pasadena, CA 91101
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 3 16,900
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $169,000
Respectful ubmltted,
R)DI:SMGtsd-
Attachment
ini
�n
r
RESOLUTION 110.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
FOR TRACT 12621F�IAA�R ZING THEEFILINGCOF A NOOrCE OF
COMPLETION FOR ME WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12621 have
been co. -nleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
hereby resolves,i that the work is herebylacceptedCanndd the Rancho
ity Engineer Is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
t
RECOMMENDATION:
The required street imprcwcmants for OR 8I -01 have been completed in an
accept -ble manner, and it is recommended that City Council ,accept said
improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance bond in
the amount of $22,000.
Background /Analysis
OR 81 -01 - located on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Maple
Place
DEVELOPER: Davis Development
1400 Bristol Street North
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $22,000
Reesspectf submitted,
J
RHM.
Attachment
i as
L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
October 19, 1980
TO:
City Courr.fl and City Manage
FROM:
Russell P. Maguire, City Engineer
BT:
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecle
SUBJECT:
Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
RECOMMENDATION:
The required street imprcwcmants for OR 8I -01 have been completed in an
accept -ble manner, and it is recommended that City Council ,accept said
improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance bond in
the amount of $22,000.
Background /Analysis
OR 81 -01 - located on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Maple
Place
DEVELOPER: Davis Development
1400 Bristol Street North
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $22,000
Reesspectf submitted,
J
RHM.
Attachment
i as
L
- `�•� rv•
4 _ �� a —♦�i �'Y'YrR. .Y.-.i .
.j
,...t' --�..y- .�:R.�Itj,-3.: ;nrpt,.�S �i,.•- � .. r, ijy. •"
CIS
RESOLUTION NO.
47-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO'
THE PUBLIC IMPROYEKEHTS
+ + %'
CUCAMDNGA, ACCEPTING
CALIFORNIA.
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
?�
FOR DR 81 =01 +AND
COMPLETION FOR-ME'NORK
r DR 87 -01 have
of thelCitymEngineer; and
been completed to the satisfaction
xNEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
No", THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
accepted and,the City Engineer is
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby
file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
authorized to sign and
San Bernardino County.,
/ a-3
M
1. 1
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $9,590.00
ResPecttfuulllY submitted,
Attachment
C
J i'K
•: l.t }
X .gyp
i i
S'
K":
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
'
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
T0: City Council and City tanager
FROM: Russeil,H. Maguire, City Engineer
BV: Steve N. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
�•
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
h�
Y.
RECONEIDATSOM:
1,
•
The required street improvements for 7740 East Avenue have
been completed
said improveeents, authorizeicthe Cirecommended
to file
accept
y
Completion and authorize the City ClerL to release
Performance Bond in the amount of $9,500.00.
an3 tl
the Faithful
Y
Background /Analysis
7740 East Avenue
DEVELOPER: Wayland Gillespie
17131 Gale Avenue
Industry, CA 91745
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $9,590.00
ResPecttfuulllY submitted,
Attachment
C
J i'K
•: l.t }
Ail ^:rKl'a: tt _ .�• ,. . i...,.,�.y_
Q� 1
RESOLUTION N0. D (4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFVRANCHO
P CUCfXNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR 7740 EAST AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
J
WHEREAS the construction of public improvements for 7740 East Avenue
w: have been comp i to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREA- Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
F,
N NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaoongm,
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
a authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
r
0
w'
a
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
PROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto
SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12922 located on the
north side of Highland Avenuo east of Haven Avenue
REC0M EWTION:
It iL recomended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to
release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds.
3ackground /Analysis
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street
improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship,
Release:
Developer: LBI Development
123 North Post Oak Lane, 1400
Houston, TX 77024
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $10,000.00
Resppeectf 11 baitted,
RFM:SlIG:,imb�—
/a!a
a
I
cuc�.MC�cn
c�z SfT IV bR'T
19.1998na9er \
If TO M tobs Pte' aStYlCcuncil enuire�fitY En9MOrks 1nsReo 62 -5 locates at the
.101 Stever m f1i intennn 5t5 Street end xe se Pveoue to
so t er of he rAv Cierk
50R3EG1 north" council eutorise
WOW t1 the Ci a SO4s a �! street
�coow- taeno ce Gunrente a s ease wocK.nSI"
is ! W er%Q4 ia1s a
1 geck9roundlPn°1Ye yeyee defeats in struction OomPenY
�quirea in f 6 IDO p *jenue. 1091130
the �vewents Pal o Cuc� e.
its OEyELOPER' Q03'5ct�ie n9
�! 9ona t5trletl 542.530.E
please. µeiateoence Warn°
sub°itte a.
VLg
sReotfui)d n
a?
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: kjssell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works lnspectmE T
SUBJECT, Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 9619 located at the
northwest corner of Carnelian Street and Jasper Street
RECCNKMTIOII:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to
release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds.
Background/Analysis
The required one year maintenance eriod has ended and the street
improvements remaj- Oree from defects fn materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER: Plaza Builders
3187 A Airway
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $81,350.00
Respectfpy submitted,
'p
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
C .�a i�+
ia
ss
'ts
DATBt October 10, 1988
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager
809JBCft Administration Department geora atica
It is recommended that the City Council authorize tba City Manager to establish
the classification of Administrative Aide at a salary range of $1,888 - $2,423
(steps 340 -390).
Information
dark Lorimar's resignation leaves the City Manager's office vith yet another
opportunity for reorganization. After Mark leaves, the City Manager's support
staff vill include an Administrative Assistant, an Advinis trative Analyst and an
admimistrative Intern. Since both Duane Baker and Diaae O'Neal have been
working in the City Manager's office for only three months, it vould not be
appropriate to promote either into the Senior Administrative Assistant's
position. gather, I find it more appropriate to continue Duane and Diane in
their present positions sad recruit sa additional full -time Administrative
person in a staff support role.
I am recommending that the City Council authorize an Administrative Aide
position which vould be considered the first step in the City's professional
administrative track. A new Administrative Aide would attend to basic details
such as providing support in legislative activities, responding to citizen
complaints, and research and drafting reports on a variety of projects and
issues. In addition, the Administrative Aide vould be assigned as support
staff to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation.
14
�a
.,
7
r
I.
4
r
r'
w
a,
r;
Administrative Department Reorganization
October 10, 1988
Page Two
The oalsry range for the Administrative Aide would be set at $1,808 — $2,423,
15% below that of the Administrative Analyst and 302 below that of the
Administrative Assistant. The administrative series would be set as follwas
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Analyst
Administrative Aide
Minimum
Step
$2,547 (400)
2,193 (370)
1,888 (340)
Control Maximum
Point Step
$3,109 (440) $3,268 (450)
2,677 (410) 2,814 (420)
2,305 (380) 2,423 (390)
Like both the Administrative Assistant and Administrative Analyst., the Aide
would be classified as a Supervisory /Professicoal employee and be entitled to
added management benefits (up to 40 hours management leave, $5,000 additional
life insursoce, 2% referred compensation.
With the City Council's concurrence, I would like to re +tructure the City
Manager's office staff and assign the following task& to the Administrative
Assistant, Administrative Analyst and Administrative Aide.
Responsibilities of Administrative Assistant
a Prioritise mail and coordincto lettcra of response for Mayor and City
Council.
• Act as primary staff to the Public Safety Commission (prepare agendas and
coordinate Commission business).
a Respond to City Council and Commission requests for service.
• Coordinate a resolution to the Labor Camp Issue.
• Administa. the City's Animal Contra Services Contract and handle related
services as necessary.
+ Coordinate the reorganization of the City's subsidiary fire district.
• Administer the City's Fireworks Ordinance and coordinate fireworks sales
activities.
• Coordinate specific employee training programs.
• Monitor the City's contract with County Sheriff.
• Coordinate the preparation of the City's Coals and Objectives and Value
Statement.
• Monitor the City's Administration Department budget.
• Prepare proclamations and coordinate presentation of the City Council.
a Prepare articles and information for the "Grapevine" and other information
materials.
• Provide staff support to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Ywndation on a
limited, as needed basis.
Responsibilities for Administrative Analyst
Provide primary staff support to the Advisory Commission (prepare agenda&
and coordinate Commission business).
/ ,)9,q-
Administrative Department Reorganisation
October 10, 1988
Page Torea
* Administer all cable televiaion franchise agreements.
* Administer all refuse collection franchise agreements and coordinate refuse
activities.
* Coordinate recycling activities.
* Admmieister the City's Mobile Rome Park Accord Agreement and coor.'inete all
mobile home activities.
* Coordinate the N*- Smoking Ordinaace.
* Coordinate activities perteining to the Community Survey.
* Coo rdinato public access television activities.
* Coordinate the City's semi - annual Clean Swap Programs.
* Provide support to the City's Sesquicentennial Celebration.
* Coordinate preparations to Student Government Day.
* Provide staff support to Omnitrans.
* Provide staff support to SANSAG
* Provide staff support to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation an a
limited, as needed basis.
Resnonaib.lities for Administrative Aide
* Provide staff support to City's legislative activities and prepare
correspondence.
* Provide staff support tc a variety of special projects.
* Provide staff support to the Rancho Cucamnnga Community Foundation.
The tbree- tiered administrative structure will allow for flexibility and future
growth of responsibility for our staff. The young team will have a great
opportunity to learn and grow within the department. 1 will also have the
option to alter job tasks appropriately among the three positions.
The Administrative Aide job description is attached for your reference.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact me.
I.HNt j is
attacbment
0509.02/88 -115
2
/D96 %.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMA
AD41MISTRATIVE AIDE
DEFINITION
This is a full .tick entry level professional administrative staff position
j assisting in the preparation of reports, special analyses and the support of
ongoing programs.
lt- Under general supervision, the administrative aide is responsible for
*l ' providing assistance in carrying out special projects, supervising or
coordinating specific assigned,-projects and programs and attending to
ad;ainistrat vs details. Work includes a wide variety of tasks designed to
y; relieve higher level management staff of details pertaining' to specific
% t,dp may also responsibility valopmentimple entation and evaationof city progras Works reviewed
by observation, conference and analysis of reports.
.L.
SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED
Receives supervision from hir r level management staff.
No supervision exercised.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES - Duties may include, but are not limited to, the
0 ow ng:
Develops, implements and evaluates specific programs as assigned.
Confers with staff concerning operational problems and issues requiring
procedural or policy review.
Conducts research, procedural and administrative work or studies; prepares
reports containing proposed or recommended solutions or courses of action.
Represents management staff at meetings as necessary.
Performs related work as assigned.
QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
Principles and practices of organization review and analysis, and public
administration.
Research techniques, sources and availability of information, and woods
of report presentation.
/29C-1
i
Rancho Cucamonga'
r�
44'
Adeleistrati ve' Ai de =
Abiltb to
i'
Design, gn, conduct, and analyze research findings.
Communicate effectively, both orally and in writing,
p
Establish and, maintain effective workiop relationships with other
employees and the public.
i
}
Implement and follow through on tasks relating to assigned
t�;
projects.
Experience and Education
Any combination equivalent to experience and education that could likely
t
provide the required knowledge and abilities would be qualifying. A
typical way to obtain the knowlwdge and
abilities would be:
Experience
r
One year of increasingly responsible adninistrative experience to
local
goverment.
Education:
v
a
Bachelor's degree in Public or Business Adolnistration or related
field.
i
4''
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 12, 29ES
TO: LAUREN WASSERMAN, CITY MANAGER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONrIA
FROM: EUGENE GILMORE, CAPTAIN
RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF`S STATION
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR POSITION UPGRADE TRAFFIC SERGEANT To
TRAFFIC LIEUTENANT
The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station would like to
upgrade the Traffic Sergeant -a positiop to that of a
Traffic Lieutenant.
The cost for this upgrade for the remainder of fiscal year
88/89, assuming the position was filled Nov�amber let, would
be $5,450.69. Additionally, the Lieutenant, if approved,
would be equipped with an unmarked Sheriff's vehicle, cost
for tho unit would be $2,786 for the remainder of this
fiscal year. The total cost of a Lieutenant with a unit
for the remainder of this fiscal year is $8,236.69.
A top step Lieutenant receiving 8% Post Incentive salary
and benefits costs $77,320 for a full year. Top step
Sergeant with the 8% Post Incentive salary and benefits
costs $67,976.
RECOMnegDATION
The Traffic Division of the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's
Station, currently consists of two Sergeants, one Senior
Deputy investigator, seven Deputy II's assigned to traffic
Tara, and four Deputy 11's assigned to motorcycle patrol.
The proposal is to upgrade one of the Traffic Sergeant
pooitlons t0 that of Traffic Lieutenant.
In 1986 the Traffic Division of the Rancho Cucamonga
Station wrote 12,060 traffic citations. In 1987, that same
division wrote 17,432 citations. During the first nine
months of 1988, the Traffic Division has already written
15,463 citations. Thic is only one indicator of the
increased workload being placed on the division. in
addition to citations, the Traffic Division is increasingly
being called on to perform special enforcement in problem
traffic areas of the city. As the city continues to grow,
it is anticipated that the number of these areas will
increase.
130
'4
r.�
M'.
Page Two t�
October 11,11988_ _
UPGRADE POSrTION /SLRGLANT- LIEUTENANT
It is felt that the,addition of a Traffic Lieutenan` will
enable the Traffic „Diviaidh.to more_aidequately.planRtraffic
enforcement strategles_ and manage traffic enforcement
efforts. •+ -
Staff feels that"the_ addition of a Traffic Lieutenant will
allow for full ti” 'ianagament, efforts on the part of the
Traffic Lieutenant ,:n4 allow_tha Sergeant to devote more
time to functional 'supervision of traffic personnel.
Submi d for your consideration.
c sla
a
4 car
�i
� .ate
M
r
' y*
b
�c
9
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANO?ICA
MEMORANDUM
DATE$ October 12, 1988
TO: LlUIREN gASBERRhN, CITY MANAGER �
CITY OP A4NCH0 CUCAEONOA
PROM EUGMM OIWiORE, CAPTAIN
RANCRO CUCANONr,A SHERIFF'S STATION
SUBJECTS REQUEST FUR POSITION UpGRADE
The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station would like to
propose that in the Records Division or.e Station Clark
Position be upgraded to a Clerk IV /euperviaor. Cost of
*.hie upgrade for' fiscal year 88189 would be $879.x)0, this
iucludee ralary and all benefits. I
RECORRP,NpATION
The Records Division of the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs
Station currently consists of 9 clerical personnel. At the
current time these personnel are rupervised by the
Administrative Sergeant. The Administrative Sergeant's
duties are surh that he can not provide full time
supervision to the clerical staff.
Station Clerk poe3ti t+;r
Cr „die : $ o the
on to a Clerk i'• ,.porvisor would allow
for functional supervision of the it, I Records Division
or. a full time basis. A top step t, IVs salary and
benefits equate to $29,074 per yes , cop step aryand
Clerk'a salary and benefits equate -o $27,7s6 per year,
total coat of this upgrade for a Eull fiscal year would be
$1,318.OS.
Strff feels that the benefits of having a full time
.upurviser in the Records Di"Gion, justify this position
upgrade.
submitted for your consido ration.
/3a
M
W5%A ti2�lJ.r
a t yCi� .c , rr :e r CITY OF RANC1i0 C[JCAMONGA
EM ANb
UM
a
DATE: October 12, vd -*
TO: a ;i._.. rT -' - -
LAURENjMl18SERMANr' CITY 7V -NAGER r .
C1, OJ IMNCBO CU, CITY `
PROMt EUGENE GILMORE, CAPTAIN nY
RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEERIFrts STATION
SUBJECTt REQUEST FOR CITIZEN PATROL VEEICrE -
The Rancho Cucamonga Citiren•datro7
donations,towerds the purchase of received $5,000 in
$1,000 waa donated b citizen-,Patrol vehicle.
Lewie
Building Associationy 8omee .n8 $4,000 by'the -
Estimated cost_ of a nee vehicle fir the rtt"s Patrol
appromimately $11,000. This est4,,19 to dasednon an 1989is ¢ "s
Ford Tempo, and is a,fleet price ,
the cit d request that
for theycitisen,stpa : iolitional y fund this vehicle
SubVed your cLnsidoration. ra t/ t E
,.,. 33
X
s
i�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Date: October 19, 1988 �
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Russell H. Mag.:ire, City Engineer
By: Richard R. Cote, Associate Civil Engineer
Subject: Proposed Intention to Construct the Jersey Boulevard
Storm Drain between Utica Street and Red Oak Avenue
within Assessment District 32 -1 and the calling for bids
for said storm drain construction.
RECMiJMTION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolutions
for A) Proposed Intention to Construct tie Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain
and B) The Calling for Bids for Construction of said Jersey Boulevard
Storm Drain, between Utica Street and Red Oak Avenue within Assessment
District 82 -1.
BACKGROUND /MALYSIS•
This report presents the Engineering Staff's intent and recommendation
for connstructinn of additional storm drain facilities within Assessment
District (AD) 82 -1, to be funded from remaining assessment revenue. AD
82 -1 is bordered by the following approximate boundaries: Arrow Route on
the north, Deer Creek Channel on the west, Fourth Street on the south 'and
Rochester Avenue on the east. The proposed storm drain facilities will
sLpplemrent and provide consistency with the now existing originally
master CpTanned facilities. Said caster planned facilities were designed
for Q100 year flows to be contained within the right -of -way end X25 year
flows to be carried in storm drains.
The first additional facility to be addressed is tha Jersey Boulevard
Storm Drain between Utica Street and Red Oak Avenue. It is proposed to
construct a 39' storm drain in Jersey Boulevard in order to mitigate
potential Q100 year flows which are presently projected to flow beyond
the right -of -way. This stretch of Jersey Boulevard has fully developeo
adjacent properties. The proposed storm drain will interconnect an
active storm drain pipe and inlet facilities at Jersey Boulevard and
Utica Street with a presently existing inactive storm drain pipe and
inlet facilities at Jersey Boulevard and Red Oak Avenue.
��7
M' %'. . <K: ».I,�tc'C hY t es�,n�a _ �. '➢,9 -v.- iP "x'_�
s
CCSR
October r19 1988evard Storm Drain
Page 2
Approval of the above mentioned Resolutions are administrative activities
required to implement expenditures of the remaining AD 82 -1 revenues for
the proposed construction'of the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain.
Respec submitted,
6: :pam
Attachment
:v
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has
previously initiated proceedings and not a public hearing pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the -Municipal Improvement Act of 1913', being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for a assessment district
designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) (hereinafter
referred to as the -Asses sment District-)I and,
WHEREAS, at this time it appears to thin legislative body that certain changes and
modifications are necessary, and that, purnuant to the provisions of Section 10353
of said Streets and Highways Coda, it Is necessary that this legislative boJy adopt
a Resolution briefly describing the proposed changes and giving notice of a Lima and
place for a public hearing where parsons may appear and show cause why said changes
should not be ordered) anal,
•'• WHEREAS, no as samente will be increased by reason of the proposed changes and
wficiatlons.
NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS rOLLOWSI
SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct
SECTION 2 That the public Interest, convenience and necessity requires, and it is
the intention of this legislative body, to order cortain changes and
modifications in the proceedings and the works of imprcvamont for this
Assessment District described as follower
The construction and installation of additional storm drain facilities
and appurtenances to serve all proportion within the boundaries of the
special Assessment District.
SECTION 3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1908, AT
THE HOUR OF 7130 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING IHE LIONS PARR COMMUNITY CENTER IACATED AT 9161
BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR
HEARING ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND
MODIFICATIONS AS PROPOSED TO BE MADE BY IHIS RESOLUTION. ANY INTERESTED
PERSON MAY APPEAR BEFOR3 THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID
CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION ANY OBJECTIONS MUST BE IN WRITINO AND
PILED WITH THE ClT! CLERK By ANY INTERESTED PERSON AT ANY TIME NOT LATEP
THAN Tt= "'we +aT FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.
.6st'1N The City Clark is hereby directed to certify to tr)e adoption of this
Resolution and cause a copy to be published ants, n999(( Iaso than tin (10)
days prior to the Bete sot for the Public Haar. Said pub). cation
shall be in the DAILY REPORT, a newspaper selgnatodCQgr legal C
publications under these pioceedinga
IIWVI -L_7ti
W
-RESOLUTION NO.
S {-
RESOLVTIOft O[ -THE CITY COUNCIL Ol THE
,,.
CISY Ol AIWCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER
CERSAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN
i
THE WORE IN A SPECIAL ASSESS(ENT
F
.
DISTRICT AND 66TTIN0 PUBLIC HEAitING
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has
previously initiated proceedings and not a public hearing pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the -Municipal Improvement Act of 1913', being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for a assessment district
designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) (hereinafter
referred to as the -Asses sment District-)I and,
WHEREAS, at this time it appears to thin legislative body that certain changes and
modifications are necessary, and that, purnuant to the provisions of Section 10353
of said Streets and Highways Coda, it Is necessary that this legislative boJy adopt
a Resolution briefly describing the proposed changes and giving notice of a Lima and
place for a public hearing where parsons may appear and show cause why said changes
should not be ordered) anal,
•'• WHEREAS, no as samente will be increased by reason of the proposed changes and
wficiatlons.
NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS rOLLOWSI
SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct
SECTION 2 That the public Interest, convenience and necessity requires, and it is
the intention of this legislative body, to order cortain changes and
modifications in the proceedings and the works of imprcvamont for this
Assessment District described as follower
The construction and installation of additional storm drain facilities
and appurtenances to serve all proportion within the boundaries of the
special Assessment District.
SECTION 3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1908, AT
THE HOUR OF 7130 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING IHE LIONS PARR COMMUNITY CENTER IACATED AT 9161
BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR
HEARING ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND
MODIFICATIONS AS PROPOSED TO BE MADE BY IHIS RESOLUTION. ANY INTERESTED
PERSON MAY APPEAR BEFOR3 THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID
CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION ANY OBJECTIONS MUST BE IN WRITINO AND
PILED WITH THE ClT! CLERK By ANY INTERESTED PERSON AT ANY TIME NOT LATEP
THAN Tt= "'we +aT FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.
.6st'1N The City Clark is hereby directed to certify to tr)e adoption of this
Resolution and cause a copy to be published ants, n999(( Iaso than tin (10)
days prior to the Bete sot for the Public Haar. Said pub). cation
shall be in the DAILY REPORT, a newspaper selgnatodCQgr legal C
publications under these pioceedinga
IIWVI -L_7ti
W
N,wa
SECTION 5. Said Changes' and modifications do not propose any increase !n �'•=
aaaeeementi in the Aasessnent District.
SECTION 6. Theo* cAnr:goo and'modiflcatione ere hereby ordered'pursuant to the provi- "
alone Of Chapter 4.S of 'Division 13 of the Streets and Highways ,Ccde,of
the State of CallfO"La. the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•.
SECTION 7 Any changes made pursuant f r d Chapter Nall not release or discharge
the sureties under any »n•tv as required under this Division, if
applicable�n',` + -
"APPROVED endO�PTED tYh .l f , 1988.
ATTEST,
CITY CLERK
CI
-MTATV _. _._..
MAYOR
--C=c.��RA.4CHO CUCAMONGA
cAa ratty_._.,,
)37 ::.
RESOLUTION NO.
5 -0
RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY,OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REPEAENCINO PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND
]DIRECTING CALL FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS
L WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has hereto-
fore instituted proceedings for changes and modifications to the works of Improve-
ment antler the provisions of the -Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•, :/sing Division
32 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the Construction
of certain public worka of improvement in a spacial asaessmont district known and
designated as ASSEsSHENT DISTRICT NO. 92 -1
referred to as the (STN STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) (hereinafter
"Aaesaamsnt District•(; and,
i
WHEREAS, at this time there have been submitted for final review the plans and specl-
flcationa for the changes and modifications to the works of Improvement for the
Assessment District; and,
WHEREAS, it in the intention of the legislative body to also call for sealed
Proposals or bids for the dolr.g of said chang*s and co2iflcations to the work and
Improvements in said Assessment Dlstrlet; and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine the pray.Lling rat* of rages for the various
classifications of workman required in the performance of said work.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS pOLLOWSr
SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2 That the plans and spec.fications _or the changes and modifications to
the works of improvement in the Assessment District are hereby approved
and authorized for bidding
SECTION 3 That it Is hereby determined and ascertained that the general proveLling
rate of per diem wages in the locality in which said work described is to
be performed in the matter of the construction of certain public works of
Improv oeent, together with appurtenances, in the Assessment District,
under the provisions of the *Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•, being
Division 12 of the Streets and Hl�uw&ye Code of the State r CallCOrrla,
for each craft or type of work and m,,a or mechanic needed to execute the
contract, also the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and over-
time work of each Craft or type of workmen or mechanic, is in accordance
with the schedule obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State
of California, and reference is hereby made to copies thereof on file
with the transcript of theme proceedings, which said copies are available
to any interacted party upon request Further a Copy shall be posted ct
each job site during the course of construction.
SECTION 4 That the proposals or bids shall be opened and examined At a public
(eating so called; and said results of the bidding shall be reported at
the next regular meeting of this legislative
the bide body otter the opening of
138
•.15.
` -3
t
I SECTION S. That theMt�imi and eonditions for bidding on the works of �leprov'am�ot� foil
_
this AswsamenY,Dietriet ere as eat forth in full in the B1d�Documente+an'
the epecifleationa`aa previously_apProved. ;Reference is hsreby!maEe ;to
aaid.eid Document: heretofore approved; and, idenllfiad "ae.TNOfICE'INVIMNQ
SEALED PROPOSALS, ASSESSMENT D36SAIcf NO. 92
_1 ,
AREA) - BID NO. 2'. For all PD- tirulars an' Co bidding _-.the Notice
Inviting 80aled Proposals &Love referenced and all incorporate C documents -
end laws, including but not limited 'to the 'Municipal Improvement Act of
1933•, shall control.
SECTION 6. That it is Asreby determined that in the event the contractor, contract-
ing Owners Included, dose not complete the work within the time limit
specified in the contract or within the time limit as shall be autho-
riaed, the contractor or contracting Owners, as the caw may be, shall
Pay as liquidated damages the amount or amounts as set forth in the speci-
fications for the project, said amounts herein referenced and so incor-
porated. That it is impractical to determine the actual damage which
will be sustained by reason of ouch delay, bat that the stated mum is a
reasonable amount for said liquidated damage: and is not being imposed as
a penalty.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
MAYOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
�Tr
1988.
V
�"}-:Y +:L. P,-`' 4 `Y��.{;Y�^4'W• -'r- - 'A"
,TY..Y. .n� -... ..�a..e✓+l =ro
*+^; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �r
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1998
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
4 BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer
C' SUBJECT: SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 16 1988 - AN APPEAL OF THE
- appeal o ve con tons o appreva
andtinfng to utility undergrounding, street dedications
and improvements, emergenCy access and store drain
facilities required by the Planning Commission for a
residential subdivision of 18 single family lots on 12.88
acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2
dwelling units per acre), located west of Sapphire Street,
is
south of Almond Street (APN 1061- 091 -03)
C
xW
'- REC(V@131DATIOM:
Staff recommends that this item be set for a public hearing on the
November 16, 1988 City Council agenda.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract 13738 was approved by the Planning Commission on
September 14, 1988. This action has been appealed to the City Council
and as such requires that a public hearing be set.
To alive for publication and mailing of Notices of the Hearing, a public
hearing should be scheduled for the regular City Council meeting of
November 16, 1988.
Respectf submitted,
Attachment
i
11
me
r
"CIT_ Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Z
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ,
s
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
i
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner $
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88- '
Various amendments -ilia
Sign r nonce raga ng neon stgn,i and windrn signs. (To
be continued to November 2, 1988)
1. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be continued to
IZ—vea—er-WrU allow the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors
additional time to review the revised language.
It. BACKGROUND: As directed by City Council at, the August 31st
workshop, staff has met with Chamber of Commerce representatives to
develop revised language that addresses both the Council's and the
Chamber's concerns. Based upon staff's discussion with the
Chamber, a revised draft amendment to the sign Ordinance was
prepared and forwarded to the Chamber.
Staff and the Chamber are requesting a continuance for additional
time to review the revisions being forwarded to the City Council.
Attached for your information is a copy of the latest draft as
presented to the Chamber.
Attachment
.. r
111
t
-C? La. =Ssr' ONLY
ORDINANCE 110. 3,58
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
88 -010 AMENDINGFTITLLE.14POF THE RANCHO ORDINANCE CAMONGAAHElII1MEHT
MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR ICON AM NINDON
SIGNS ANP ADDING PROVISION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY
SPONSORED SPECIAL EVENTS
follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
SECTION 1: Section 14.08.030 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as
follows, n7 —w0rZs and graphics:
including a en re area
of not more than eight strai
the extreme limits of the wr
together with any material o
of the display or used to dl
structure against which it i.
framework or bracing that is
case of a bIo- sided, multi -s'
computed as including the ma:
any ground position at one t
Area of sign" shall be computed by
a single, continuous, rectilinear perfmnter
lines, or a circle or an ellipse, enclosing
g, representation, emblem, or other display,
or forming an integral part of the background
entiate the sign from the backdrop of
aced, but not including any supporting
arly incidental to the display itself. In the
or three dimensional sign, the area shall be
a sin;la display surface which is visible from
WDIYIDUIL.I.L'1'rna qaN plCalf7) 10st AM
c*&u � FerEav"
DMMMAL LLTM 9M
L
Detarmining Sign Areas
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0.
RE: SIGN ORD. AMEND. 88 -01
Page 2
�.
fO110ws: SECTION 2: Section 14.08.380 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as
14.08.030 Window sign. "Window slon" means a sign painted, attached,
glued, or o erM se a xe a window or located within three feet of the
interior side of the window or otherwise easily visf4le from the exterior of
l� the building.
follows: SECTION 3: Section 14.20.070 of Chapter 14.20 Is amended to read as
siggn mater4820 n7excerTrimm m of —srg{ �S Neon as a
following provisions:
V A. Permitted only in the more intense commercial zones:
r
Caamnfty Commercial
Regional Related Commercial
Regional Commercial
• B. Exposed tubing Is prohibited. Neon tubing shall be
fully enclosed in a metal frame and covered with
plexiglass.
C. Wtthid shopping centers, neon signs clay be allowed
only as part of a Uniform Sign Progra:o.
D. Such signs shall be limited to business identification
only, and may include graphic symbols.
follows: SECTION 4: Section 14.20.071 is added to Chapter 14.20 to read as
14.20.071 Neon s1 ns - interior. Neon tubing may be permitted as a
sign material or n er or w n cw ST, ns subject to the following provisions:
A. Permitted In commercial zones only.
B. No more than two neon window signs shall be permitted
per business.
C. Generic name messages shall not exceed two square
feet. A combination of graphic symbols and generic
names may be used; however, the total combined sign
area shall not exceed four ;quare feet.
D. Names shall be limited to generic messages, such as
OPEN or PIZZA . No product advertising or business
identification is allowed except in the form of a
graphic symbol.
`j3
•n
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0.
RE: SIGN ORD. AMEND. 88-01
Page 3
follows; SECTION 5: Subsection Q is added to Section 14.16.010 to read as
Q. Teaporary window signs shall be permitted for any business in a
commercial zone, and for commercial type uses in industrial or
office zones when approved as part of a Uniform Sign Program,
subject to the following criteria:
1. Limited to temporary messages such as sales. No
business identification is permitted.
2. Maximum sign area shall be up to 30 percent of the
wtndow area, not to exceed 150 square feet.
3. The placement of the sign shall be located on the
first floor only on multi -story buildings, and
shall not exceed 20 feet in height above finished
grade an one -story buildings.
4. No temporary window sign shall be displayed
continuously for more than 30 days.
S. Paper signs which advertise "weekly specials ", and
similar signs which are rotated on a regular
basis, shall have a fastening device for a more
Permanent Took. Window signs affixed with tape
are discouraged.
follows: SECTION 6: Section 14.08.215 is added to Chapter 14.08 to read as
14.08.215 Neon sign. "Neon sign" means arty glass tube lighting in
which a gas and p osp ors are used in combination to create a colored sign.
follows: SECTION 7: Section 14.20.000 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as
14.20.080 Permitted si ns - Residentfal Zones. The following signs
may be perm e n e res en a zones su ec o e provisions listed:
(Chart remains unchanged)
follows: SECTION 8: Section 14.20.100 of Chapter 14.2u is amended to read as
following ls gnslmwyP5e pte1'xmd se nsn- Cormercirc andanfftoce c s_eslsubject to
the provisions listed:
(see revfbed chart attached)
Y
Clrf
AE:
Page 4
.F
SECTION 9: Section 14.20.110 of Chapter 14.20 is: amended to read as
follows:
14.20.110 Pernftted si ns - Industrial Zones. The,folloring signs
may he pem n e r us r a zones su ec a provisions listed:
(Chart remains unchanged)
SECTION io: Section 14:24.090 is adf" i to Chapter 14.24 to read as
'follows:
14.24.090 Sign .color. Sign colors should he compatible with the
building arch ec re. Within shopping centers, sign color should compliment
the color scheme for the center: The use of garish or ilourescent colors is
considered inappropriate.
SECTION 11: This Council finds that this amendeent will not
adversely a ec a environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
R
y
ors
34
w
a
ti
rY
' :s rd :'h.mce.�s. .ry�wy..�•.
• :a
r4
�;i' �•s E� sj. Pis ��b9sYt�'�14ff 1HpY� • $93 l9 p�.
i@ds ors I ��: 2 ga ;f a �9 89;a Ill.'s
oil
Y 3 1 E 9 Sill
39�, Y
lit 12,1 �eg1 Aga
s a a a a a a
�y55 ya��
a
s
a 'a as s
a 9�i y7
lB�iAL 8 ilia] 8 8
■S
�8 alai
E z fin
e� 9' $$�� � l t • a a
Sill tilt anti
8� s
a
IIjIlid
_ a
�t
L• I
9
ilia) 1 '. 1
e$
sill gill
g � yp j
B $a B aa�l
Ii M11
ega
ao °e� $ sr $••2 �$8 3
edi$d
ja
a r
i
i
I
a
as
fit
Ilk
�Ga Y
i lij
a$ ds ] �
li
a F g
f 8S
sl9
T
J
/(-� 9
` 'k.1
. .h?a ° i'F �• r.5. i'U�.L p'1.r'. _ n fur � _ � _ � •,
6& wffjjj�51 MUM �60�xlp
r�
JAMES F. BAILEY
mawnwnncurt -
October 13, 1988 r
Vx
b
Mr. Jack Lam i
�t-:
Community DeVelOPment Director 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
'-
,
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Ia.
Rat General Plan Amendment No. 88 -04 .
Dear Jack: ;
Please consider this letter as our formal request
to withdraw the
1
w
above- mentioned General Plan Ame d-
n
went and rccompanying Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88 -07
1+� Vorl, truly yours, v
S:
LYON COMPANY
i
James P. Bailey
JBB:nc
cc: Mr. John Potter
Hughes Investn,,enta
109
E3.70AK*Ax dAarn rnnagy Ceaf 94730 (7V) M2244
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIAONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Lctober 19, 1988
TO: City Council and amity Manager
FR(N: Brad BNler, City Planner
BY: Al,n Warren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENEM PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88-
03C - Ihzitex: A request to anz )nd the General Plan Land Use
Map from Very Low density residential (1 -2 du /acre) to
General Comaercial for 57,5+ acres of land located south of
24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway.
fhe City Council will eoosider other appropriate General
Plan land use categories (Neighborhood Comeercial, and
Office). AP!'s 226- 121 -08, 11, 12, and 225 - 112 -03.
II.
L ASSESSMENT AND ETI'd=A SPECIFIC PLAN
), 88 -05 - Unitex: A request to amend the
:cific Plan Map from "VL" (Very Low density
1 -2 du /acre) to "GC" (General Com erclal for
of land located south of 24th Street between
e and the I -15 Freeway; and from "FC" (Freeway
to "GC" (General Comarcial) for 6.5 acres of
westerly conjunction of Cherry Avenue and the
Y. The City Council will consider other
Etivanda Specific Plan land use categories
1 Comeercial, Convenience Comercial, Freeway -
wmercial, OFfice /Professional). APN's
L1, 12, and 226- 112 -03.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City
Dune approve General Flan Amendment 88 -03C and Ettwanda Specific
Plan Amendment 88 -05. Further, the Planning Commission determined
that no significant environmentcl impaLts would result from
implementing the land use changes and the Commission recommends
that the City Council grant a negative declaration for the
application,
DISCUSSION: At its September 28, 1988 meeting, the Planning
amm ss on reviewed the subject applicatlors requesting land use
changes for 63+ acres of land bordered ey Cherry Avenue, 24th
Street and the I -13 Freeway. During their review, the Planning
Conwissioners concurred with staff's analysis as detailed in the
Planning Commission report of September 28, 1988. Significant
issues which resulted in the recommendation included the following:
l-5D
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA 88-03C - ,UNITE)(
October 19, 1988
Page 2
A. The bordering of the .site by two arterial roads and the
freeway does not make the site conducive to a single family
neighborhood due to concerns over noise and air quality.
B. The surrounding characteristic which make the site undesirable
for residential use alternatively offer good commercial
development" opportunities fie., exposure to high traffic
roads?.
C. The ability of the site to satisfy existing General Plan and
Etiwanda Specific Plan goals and objectives for commercial
development.
For an to -depth analysis and additional information, plesse refer
to the attached Planning Commission report and minutes of September
28, 1988.
III. FM.TS FOR FINDINGS: Based upon the conclusions listed in the
attached Plann ng oemission staff report of September 28th and
Planning Commission Resol�ttors No. 88-191 and W. 88 -192, the City
Counc•i can make the Wlvoing findings regarding this application:
,110 Po.'r',Y Is suitable for the uses permitted in the
droµ:sA lard designation and district in terms of access, as
4evemined by the Engineering Section analysis of the traffic
stuttt oral proposed area roadway improvements; size, as
rufIectad by smaller area requirements for potential
altenlstive cm=rciai designations; and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area ds evidenced by
general 1Rck of development and compatibility with bordering
arterial roads and freeway; and,
2. TRe pmposcd amendments would not have significant impacts on
the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by
the conclusions and findings of the Initial Environmental
Study; and,
3. The proposed amendments :re in conformance with the GP and ESP
as evidenced by the ability of the proposed land use
designations to satisfy the commercial policies and objectives
of the GP and ESP.
4. That a Master Plan designation is needrd to ensuna the proper
coordination of a phased development of the site.
1sl
; UNITD(i
3 Page 3
p N
F- IV. CORRESPONDENCE:" 'This item has been advertised as a public hearing h
In e a Re or' newspaper, and notices sent to all property
ormers w n; met of the project site.
iV* V. ACTION: If the ,City Council concurs with the recou.mendation of the
ann ng Comission. for approval of General Plan Amendment 88-03C
and Ettwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88-05, the adoption of -the i
S{y attached City Council Resolution and Ordinance would be
appropriate. t
' Res ull t£
i✓
t
q�
Bra er -
q' City P nner -
d
BB:AN:sd
i` Attachments: Planning Commission Report, September 28, 1988
r Planning Cn mfssfon Minutes, September 28, 1988
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 88491 and 88 -192
City Council Resolution and Ordinance
i'
C117 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �,
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 28, 1988
TO: Chairman and Heabers of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMEROKENT N0.
reques o amen a nera an n
use p , from cry Low Density Residential (1- 21dwelling
units per acre) to General Commercial for 57.5+ acres of
land located south -of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue
and the I -15 Freeway. The Planning Commission will
consider other approppriate General land use categories
(Nei hborhood Commercial and Office) - APR: 226- 121 -08,
un.iu - A request ro ameno the
wanaa Residential e l -2 dwelling unitsmmper acre) to •GC'w (General
Commercial) for 67.5+ acres of land located south of 24th
Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway; and
from "FC" (Freeway Commercial) to "GC" (General
Cumercial) for 6.5 acres of land at the westerly Junction
of Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway. The Planning
(:ommission will consider the other appropriate Etiwanda
Specific Plan land usa categories (Neighborhood
Commercial, Convenience Commercial, Freeway - Related
Cometcial. Office /Professional) - APN: 226 - 121 -08, 11,
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Undeveloped; Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan designation
R -1 4500 (City of Fontana).
South - I -15 Freeway.
East - I -15 Freeway.
West - Undeveloped; Flood Control Corridor; Etiwanda
Specific Plan Designation Open Space (OP).
153 ITEM H,1
PLANNING CO MISSION -lAFF REPORT
GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX
September 28, 1988
Page 2
B. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Very Low Residential (less .hai -..elliog units
per acre) and Commercial.
North - very Low Residential (less than 2 daelling units pe•
acre) (Rancho Cucamonga General Plan).
South - Freeway.
East - Freeway.
West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor.
C. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant and the
land slopes gre ua y to the southwest at about 4%. Portions
of the site are currently cultivated with vineyards. The
Hawker Crawford Channel, partially improved, tr.•verses the site
carrying storm water free the north to San Sevaine Spreading
Basins. Surrounding land uses are primarily vacant grass
lands. To the west exists the San Sevaina Spreading Basins
which are used for store water detention and ground water
recharge. The property to the north 1s in the City of Fontana
and it is zoned for residential use and a housing project
(Hunter's Ridge) has recently been approved.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study,
an case e e e Environmental Checklist, Part II of the
Initial Study, and has found no significant adverse environmental
impacts to occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment
88 -03C and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -05.
III. LAND USE ANALYSIS:
Back round: The existing General Plan (GP) Land Use Designation
R ec s a City's policies to limit residential density in the
Etiwanda and foothill areas. During the development of the
Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) areas of special significance were
reviewed and land use decisions were specifically determined. All
other areas generally received the Very Low (VL) Designation. No
analysis was made on this specific site and therefore VL was
determined appropriate due to the above - mentioned policy.
Discussicn: Analysts of the request shall revolve around the
0 ow ng ssues:
A Appropriateness of the exlstin YL desi nation - The site is a
triangular area o an oun e y arm
er aT roads (24th Street
and Cherry), Flood Control Spreading Grounds (San Sevaine
Wash), and the I -15 Freeway. With the noise and air pollution
from the freeway and traffic an Cherry and 24th, the site does
not lend itself to creating a quiet rural atmosphere desired
for a 1/2 acre single family residential subdivision •ne
appropriateness of the existing land use and other more intense
/54
DAMNIPLANNING CC.AIISSION AF} REPORT
NG
88-03C - UNITEX
September 28, 1988
Page 3
residential uses in close proximity to the freeway should
therefore be questioned. Partial reduction of the residential
designation cn the site is questionable due to the narrowness
of the site hetw¢en the freeway and Cherry Avenue. Deletion of
residential uses residentialasttri� along C� frontage would result
B. Need and viabil.. of commercial uses in the area - The
foes on the potential fo- rccrcfal derelo a area which
site. The study conclusions indleate the folevelopment on the
1. The site has excellent locatfonal characteristics
because of its freeway access and visibility, its scale
(property), and its relative immunity from potentially
competitive developments planned to the north of the
site.
2. Pro9ection scenarios identify a window of opportunity in
1994 for the 0volopment of a 120,000 square foot
neighborhood shupping center anchored by a supermarket
and drug store or variety/hoa* improvement store.
3• An analysis of the potential of a more ambitious
community -scale center (up to SO acres) indicates that
there will be adequate untapped demand to support such a
center.
4• Projected absorption potential for garden office space
(two -story with a density of about 17,000 square
feet / acrel to the near term is likely to be fairly
minimal at one or two acres per year.
S• A shortfall of 900,000 square feet of retail /service
categories can be expected within a four mile trade area
radius around the site at the horizon population level.
C. Confmre..nr. ..r.w
use category characterfzed by a broader range aofause
activities than any other Commercial designation. It includes
local commercial, community shopping /office complexes, and
commercial uses surrounding the regional center. Further, the
GP states that in relation to the local commercial type, future
concentrations activities eactivities organl ed nine linear
strip commercial fashion.
eonfiguratl The site In its triangular
On next to the freeway and bordared by arterial
roads provides easy opportunity tr concentrate commercial
activity. commercial
/5S
PLANNING COMiISSION .AFF REPORT
GPA 88 -03C - UNITE)(
September 28, 1988
Page 4
D.
The ESP provides the following objectives for Commercial
Services:
Sec. 3.52.100 - Prevent future commercial areas
and associated traffic from adversely impacting
the character of the community.
sx2 Prevent u lripaaociated traffic from adversely commercial the
established core, including Etiwanda, and victoria
Avenues.
Sec. 3.52.300 - Provide future shopping and other
coa.rercial facilities to adequately serve Etiwanda
residents' every day needs with minimum disruption
of the quality of the residential environment.
Sec. 3.52.400 - Where appropriate and feasible
without undue Jisruftion of residential areas,
provide the commerc ial facilities to serve the
Community as a whole.
The location of the site on the periphery of the Etiwanda
community is ideal to satisfy the above objectives.
geometrics around the site will accoasodate� a. Caamerclal
designation for the site. This determination is the result of
review of the applicant — submitted traffic study and the
recently completed design work for the designation of Cherry
Avenue as a major arterial street to accommodate the ltrnter's
Ridge development in Fontana. The access control for a
commercial development will be provided by the addition of
landscaped median islands in 24th Street, the Loop Road and
Cherry Avenue.
Recognizing that a major part of
concerns relate to motor vehicle em1
provided an analysis based on the
Etiwanda Specific Plan Environmental
traffic study indicates that there wil
for the totail proposed project area
This 1s the result of significantly hi
than the recent traffic analysis
conclusion i!; that since the trips
reduced, air quality 1s not signiflcan
EIR was provided and therefore the on
this area.
/J
the area's air quality
,sions, the applicant has
raffle forecasts of the
impact Report (EIR). The
I be fewer combined trips
than listed in the EIR.
lher estimates in the EIR
has identified. The
for the area have been
:ly changed from when the
11nal EIR 1s adequate for
PLANNING COWISSION :AFF REPORT
GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX
September 28, 1988
Page 5
E. Consideration of alternative land uses - Other potential
commercially related des gna ons fin-Muile—the following:
1. GP - Neighborhood Commercial
ESP - Neighborhood Commerciai; Freeway- Related Services;
Convenience Commercial
These categories include shopping centers and convenience
commercial clusters that provide essential retail goods and
services to residents or occupants in the immediate area.
The ESP farther defines the Neighborhood Commercial as meeting
the needs of neighborhoods with a total population of 8,000 to
10,000 residents and that the primary use within the center
should be a supemarket ranging from 30,000 to 100,000 square
feet. Additional recoemerdations include that the site should
be easily accessible by bicycle or foot, neighborhood centers
should be not closer than one mile of another, and their
location should not encourage vehicular traffic in established
residential areas or on Etiwanda Avenue. Freeway- Related
Services designation is intended to serve both local and
through traffic residents. A typical fec';ity would include a
service station, fast food and other. businesses which desire
freeway erposure within a neighborhood center. This site wrild
be able to satisfy the location criteria, for both uses, but at
64 acres only a portion of the site should be considered for
neighborhood commercial activities.
Convenience Commercial establishments are small, localized
retail and /or service businesses Vlat provide goods and
merchandise to the immediate surrounding land uses.
Convenience facilities primary function is to provide a
convenient place to buy groceries, but eating and drinking
establishments, food and beverage sales, limited personal,
medical, and retail sales may also be included. Sites should
be about 2 -3 acres in size and within convenient walking
distance or bike ride from the intended users. Again, due to
the large size of the site, only a portion of the properties in
question should be alternatively considered for this
designation.
2. GP - Office
ESP - Offices
The GP and ESP discourage the proliferation of individual
isolated offices. Instead, these designations encourage
development clusters where office uses and support commercial
services can be loceted. The freeway access and sizable area
make the site an acceptable office site from a land use
perspective. The limited office demand in the area, however,
would raise viability concerns fcr this site now and in the
foreseeable future. /��
C
PLIINNING`cdmrsSloW':,,AFF REPORT
GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX :
September 28, 1988
Page 6
IV
V
3. ESP.- Master Plan
The ESP allows for the establishsent,of Master Plan areas.
Because of the size of the site and the economic _analysts
indicating development potential at various, times in the
future, staff believes it would be appropriate to consider a
master plan designation. This would result in the requirement
of an approved master plan, with a phasing program, prior to
any development taking place.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based upon the conclusions listed e above, staff
eves a snning ,Coasaission can make the following findings
regarding this'application.
,.
1. The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed
land designation,and district in terms of access, as determined
by the Engineering Section's analysis of the traffic study and
Proposed area roadway improvements; size, as reflected by
smaller area requirements for potential alternative commercial
designations; and compatibility with existing land use in the
surrounding area as evidenced by general lack of development
ann compatibility with bordering arterial roads and freeway;
2. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on
the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by
the conclusions and findings of the Initial Environmental
Study; and
3. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the GP and ESP
as evidenced by the ability of the proposed land use
designations to satisfy the commercial policies and objectives
of the GP and ESP; and
4. That a Master Plan designation 1s needed to ensure the proper
coordination of a phased development of the site.
CORRESPOM)ENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
n The a Re rt newspaper, the property posted, and notices
sec o a proper owners within 300 feet of the project site.
e's
�f
r(
i
7
n
PLANNING COMMISSION -
GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX
Septrbor 28, 1988
Page 7
VI. RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that the Planning Commission
recammen o the City Council the approval of General Plan
Amendment No. 88 -03C and Ettwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 88 -05
with a Master Plan designation by the adoption of the attached
draft Resolutions.
Re c idly b tt
e
d Bu r
C1 nner
BB:AN:ko
atta0cents: Exhibit "A' - General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan
Location Maps
Exhibit "B' - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Development District (ESP) Amendment Map
Exhihit 'D' - Nunter's ifdge Plan
Draft Resolution EPA 88-03C
Draft Resolution ESPA 80-05
a
VL ESPA 88-05
VL 1r VL 11 VL
OS ,' / t 11 CITY OP ECNTANX
M 41
illill"N.MM14
H �o ylf=Km
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: GPA 88.03C & ESPA 88.05
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: OA*
�SCALE:�
CITY OF MWANA
MODOMAL
VWWLOW.vM
Lom4uckmjvppcg
M CommumAL
Am PACLHkN
xm E)Wfm KWOLS
om lFmx
HLLSW Magma"
LOW w,mw
LD*M§Dnm "�w
= Commummy comkoraw
=3 WK060PNOW COWA
804r,=.
ffim'��
am vwx
Cmp mcmms-*��
M F820"COWAMAL
C= CWrXTWALWY
=1 FWW ComTy4uuTLwf Com
cmp WW WW"
Cr
— 9PWA •CLUVAPm
M "m �=�
0 UUMPLAMPOMMOD
VL ESPA 88-05
VL 1r VL 11 VL
OS ,' / t 11 CITY OP ECNTANX
M 41
illill"N.MM14
H �o ylf=Km
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: GPA 88.03C & ESPA 88.05
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: OA*
�SCALE:�
T.
- r_ * . . I , .1 .
.�, °,LIeIHx3 NOISIAIQ JNINNvad
80 88 rdS3 9 �£0 88 Vd3 •'A ZI �'ON()IVDl1J OHDKVH
30 A llo
•„ • I I gyS yqy 7}N gNU NQQynny ss QSPD yy ss
OVM�iSYLFNMI�L�YNVPV�PObSJtl
I I 50bSOYk '38�4.1"�i7a99LPYCMi2:�G0 :::viii
II > G YJ 4 .CVLYeYC64P9L
�;e��2�t�sar
±� \y I " N�Syyr,[ s,s[( �(��yyBCyL" yG,E��8iyy�8.�gFqs�ppb'�i °u�myynyy$� C
'�� II SH�ONP PONYy S�S�`LPPM- �UINtlS � Q
m
I m
{. I
0
I 3
s� II ♦ z
I ♦ ��r
�� ♦ / 33
H
i r ♦ ♦ � >c C7
D
R1
I® °
+� m
z
ob 5a `�
I -
I
i±
e;
Land l!%
Z �
NORTE;
GPA 88 -03C a ESPA 88.05 =`
CITY i OF ITEM:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:_ Hunter's RVdgo plan
PLANNING DIVISION ��3 EXHIBIT: '°' SCALE:
v
. J
-- K
,
I)I
• OF 011
A;7 is
.
.�.
Q M•300W 24
Sa.O
AN 7tA11
l
y"'4• �
l0000
= 116 -10000 it
1.6
A`AG
_ A✓�-
f
taaa►Al�ravoolTUL
Q 111 -7100 177
7"
\\ .• ��
M
sK1/ i
_
1
Q 1/d00o 710
139.9
\ v��
. 4 ..3r/ 1
•� Q 111 -4100 431
71.a
QWINE- ]1000"Im*10use 320
37.1
NOW WARTUD " 230
10.8
a
911rTOTAL 24121
359.3
Mt.oeO
COMMOCIAL
� a]aw0toaocouAMMAL
e.6
w
c
M I
_
°
PARK
50.1
u we i4 1
T
Q lOm1TAM 60100t
toA
•
410
a
oral tot
Immo
` Q m
xt.s
1
aiM
J
Q pr m
117A
"AC
5519 oaf r
77.9
jo
If
Q �
�prsaT 1
1t1{.TOTAL
Ttr7u
x084
2167.6
ILI
��
MW
�ati0
• ��
b �
MIN41 Yli NfA 0AT1
.4.0
lAC brie °
3t4r0f- .0.o0.,.sT
ALA AC- 16TAPtt
3.5 01 1r m
Hunter's
Ridge
A arccllc PLAN IQfpMMIRD FOR M U7Y a FOH7ANA waa +w °°'•'1O'
Z �
NORTE;
GPA 88 -03C a ESPA 88.05 =`
CITY i OF ITEM:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:_ Hunter's RVdgo plan
PLANNING DIVISION ��3 EXHIBIT: '°' SCALE:
!, Chairmn McNfel stated he felt that a park was definitely needed in that
area. He requested that correspondence with Community Services be made
- Indicating the Pltnnfng Cosission's support for a park in that area.
{„ Mr. Buller stated staff would Send a memo to Community Services.
' Commissicner Chitlea stated this was particularly important at this time
because there were few available retaining parcels of land in that area.
Motion: Moved by Chftfea, seconded by Blakesley, to adopt the Resolution
recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment
88 -038. Notion carried by the following vote:
' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHIiIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
r
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ROME
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK - carried
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN'; AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88 -03C - UWITEK -
rtques to amen o rl'' an an se
Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) to General Coommercialafor e57.5+
acres of land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the
General re and Use Th will
and Officer- prAPN:
226 - 121 -08, 11, 12 and 226- 112 -03.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSwI awn mrtu,A ^, •
UNITEx - A regaea am! wan a --- ^v. oo -ua
ow ensity Residential, 1 -2 dwelling units per acre) W '6 • (General
Commercial) for 57.5+ acres of tad located south of 24th Street between
Cherry Avenue and the 1 -15 Freeway; and from "FC' (Freeway Commercial) to
"GC" (General Commercial) for 6.5 acres of land at the westerly junction
consider thevother appropriate Ettwa daSpe^ -lfic Plan land use icategories
(Neighborhood Commercial, Convenience Commercial, Freeway- Related
Commercial, Office /Professional) - APH: 226 - 121 -08, 11, 12 and 226 -112-
03.
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman HCHIel opened the public hearing.
Dirk Johnston, 2402 Michelson, Irvine, representing Unitex, stated they agreed
with the staff report.
As there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission Minutes
-4-
September 28, 1988
■
i
x
Commissionar Blakesley stated the site was more appropriate for office/
commercial development than for residential. He felt General Commercial sites
arterialsn,9he stated thisiparcel area. Because of the
access and he Proximity would major
good buffer for the freeway.
Commissioner Tolstoy recommended they approve the action because freeway
exposure and the triangular configuration made it a poor residential site. He
also felt the nearby market area would support such a center. He suggested
the Commission should push for a master plan, and felt there were several uses
available for the property, such as Neighborhood Commercial with freeway -
related services and Office /Professional buildings. He also pointed out that
the applicant should be sensitive to signaga needs for the center.
Commissioner Chitiea agreed that a master plan was essential for the location
because of the freeway exposure and felt the property was a gateway to the
City. She stated the applicant needed .to be sensitive to the aesthetics and
insure high standards from the beginning.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Specific Plan could be very specific and
indicate architectural style and criteria, and if that was desired it could be
brought back as a separate amendment. He recommended it be placed on a future
agenda of the Design Review Committee in order to establish parameters for
development of the center.
Commissioner Chitiea stated she felt the item needed to be workshopped at some
point.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated circulation needed to be addressed.
Chairman Mc Niel reopened the public hearing.
Mr. Johnston stated they would be happy to work with the City to design a
quality project to meet the standards of the City. He pointed out the
developer• agreed it was a gateway project for north Etlwanda and said the
properrj was a long -term project, not 'for -sale' property.
As there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Buller stated he felt the Commission could approve the two amendmrunts as
written and have staff prepare a future amendment to establish the guidelines
discussed
Motion. Moved by Blakesley, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolutions
Amendment no. 88-03C and of the EtiwandanSpecifictplan Assessment
t No. 88- 05ra1Motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT.
COMMISSIONERS:
Planning Commission Minutes
BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NONE
E14ERICK - carried
-5- September 28, 1988
l�
RESOLUTION N0. 88 -191
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCA40NGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03C. TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN FROM VERY DAND USE UNITS PER ACRE) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL OR 5715♦
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY
AVENUE AND THE I -15 FREEWAY, RANCHO CUCAtONGA, CALIFORNIA
AND MACE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 226 - 121 -08,
11, AND 12.
A. Recitals.
(1) Unitex for approval of General hPlan ikxn8aent application asedescribed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan
Amenboent is referred to as "the application`.
Rancho Cucamonga conducted ea r duly noticed publicnhearinngg onsthe application,of
(iii) All legal Prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
l iitaisitiltnta the tacts set forth in theRecls,Part hereby o specifically Resoluionare true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - refere rl meeting on September 28, 1988, including written
and oral staff reports, .ht Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
land, basicallyaa narrow triangularnconfiyiuration. located on a side
of of 24th Street, between Cherry Avenue and the J -15 Freeway and is presently
" ndeveloped, Said property is currently designated as Very Low Residential
VL "; and
designated Very Low •VL "a(RanchorCuc mongaeGeneral Plan) hand subject site is
The property to the west is designated Flood control/Utility Corridor and is
undeveloped. The property to the east and south is designated Freeway and it
developed with J -15 Freeway.
/ 0 1
RESOLUTION N0. 88 -191
UNITEX - GPA 88-03C
Page
September 28, 1988
(c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the
district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
(d) This amaenaent does promote the goals and objectives of
the Land Use Elements; and
detrimental to(the adjacent properties and would not have a sllgniflcant injurious
on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative
Declaration be issued.
during the 3. above ereferencted meetingtand upon nthepspecific findings Commission
set forth in aragrsph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) The: 'he oroposed project is suitable for the
us(* perm tted in th• Imposed district in
teens of ccess, sire, and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area; and
(b) That the proposed amendment would not have
significant Impacts on the environment nor the
surrounding properties; and
(c) That the proposed amendment is in conforman:e
with the General Plan.
4. This been reviewed and considered incoglia�neawithetthhef Cali California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance
Of a Negative Declaration.
S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above; this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section
65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of
September, 1988, General Plan Amendment No. 88 -03C.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
l �o
RESOLUTION�Bn_ an_,o,� _ - 4.
UNIMA, - 'UPA'aa -WC- .
September 28, 1988
Page 3
APPROYEO AND ADOPTEO'T11IS 28111 OAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Cucaawnga. do hereby Secretary that the Planning i Resolution on Cress odu y Rancho
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission held
on the 28th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY. CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK
11 (0g
&._
ti
t
.ry
A
RESOLUTION N0. 88 -192
�^ A� LLM155I09 OF THE CITY OF
CALIFORNIA, RECOFMENOIND APPROVAL OF
'� UU DMENT1P88 -05, �To AMEND THE
(1 -2 DWELLING UNITS P ACRE) omGN
FOR 57.5+ ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH
EIUEEN CHERRY- AVENUE AND THC- I -15
'FC' (FREEWAY COMMERCIAL) TO 'GC'
1 FOR 6.5 ACRES OF LAND AT THE
IN OF CHERRY' AVENUE AND THE I -16
A"O r C2ALfiFORNI B AND WX AND 2265
A. Recitals.
r•
(1) Unitex has filed on application on behalf of INM Ccrporatfon
for Etiwanda Specific Plan Aeenoment No. 88_05 as described in the titre of
this Resolution. Hereinafter In this Resolution, the subject Etfwanda
Specific Plan Awndaent is referred to as 'the application'.
' (if) On September 28, 1988, the Planning Commissfon of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
have occurred All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
B. Resolution.
ROM. THEREFORE, it 1s hereby found, deter"fnad and resolved by the
Planning Ccamissfon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
set forthlin theiRecitaals, Part Aeof finds
correeciacts
2. Based upon substantial e, 'rote presented to this Coomissfon
during the above - referenced meeting on S�Plember M. 1988, including written
and oral staff reports, thppis Commission N•.sreby specifically finds as follows:
basically a narrow triangularcconfiguration ,tlocatedxonn acres of of 24R Street, between Cher Ave Avenue and
and the I5 Freeway; and at the easterly
conjunction of Cher presently
undeve1aped. Said properties are Currently ldesignated as and Is (V w
Residents and 'FC" (Freeway COMbercial); and
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -192
UNITEX - ESPA 88-05
September 28, 1988
Page 2
designated Hunter's Rid Property to the north of the subject site is
g e Specific Plan, R -1 4500 (City of Fontana) and is
undeveloped. The property to the west is designated °OP° (Open Space) and is
undeveloped flood control area. The pproperty to the east and south is
designated Freeway and is developed as I -15 Freeway.
(c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) and will provide for developert,
within the district, in a manner consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan
and with related development; and
(d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of
the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
detrimental to (the adjacent propeerrties would d would not have aisignificant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative
Declaration be issued.
3. Based un the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above -referpoenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is suitable for the
uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area; and
(h) That the proposed amendment would not have
significant Impdcts on the environment nor the
surrounding properties; and
(c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance
with the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
(d) That a Master Plan Designation is needed to
ensure the proper coordination of a phased
development of the site.
4. This been reviewed and considered in rcompliancea with ethefCalifornia Environmental
Quality pct of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
1. 2 and 53 above. this Commission n9hereby resolves inthattpursuantntoaSecticn
65850 to 65855 of the California Government Cade, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of
September 1988, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 88 -05 and with the
incorporation of a Master Plan Designation.
%D
r_
J[
UNITEX'- 'ESPA:.8&05 ' ? �'
September 28 „1988
Page 3 - • ,A -
' tt
6. The Secretary
of this Resolution. to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
APPROYEU AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1998.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA }
BY
1?4l MC
Cucamo 9a, do hereby Secretary the theinfareogmmotng i Resolutlan City duly and nc
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coanw s d of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regnia aKetiy of the Planning Casts ion held
on the 28th day of September, 1988 the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY,CNITIEA, HCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EHERICK
K
RESOLUTION No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
PLANK AMENDMENT 88 -03IC. TO MENNDMTHEGGEENNEERAL PLAN LAND
NAP FROM VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 57.5+ ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND
THE I -15 FREEWAY, RANCHO CUCAMORGA, CALIFORNIA AND MAKE
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 226- 121 -08, 11, AND
12.
_+ A. Recitals.
G•
(i) Unitex has filed an application on behalf of INTER Corporation
for approval of General Plan Amendment No. 88-03C as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan
,3 Amendment is referred to as 'the application -.
Rancho Cucamonga�co ducttedea dulylnotic de public Planning gisonothefapplication,
�
and following the conclusion of said publid hearing adopted Resolution No. 88-
191 recommending to this City Council that said application be approved and
that Negative Declaration be certified.
Cucamonga hold a On no ticed9public hearing and Council of concluded said hearing Rancho
to its adoption of this Resolution. 9 prior
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
^ity Council of the City of Rancho ppCucamonga as follows:
1. This forth in the Recitals�,nParthA. of thisiResolution arettrue and correctfacts set
reviewed land onsideedtlinheCecepliance and etheflCalifornla�Environmental a
Quality Act of 1970 (and, further, this Council hereby issues a Uegative
Declaration)
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above - referenced meeting on October 19, 1988, including written and oral
staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to approximately 57.5
acres of land, basically a narrow triangular
configuration, located on the south side of
Ual I" - Urn C0 W6
�• ✓�
October 19, 1988-
.,:
Page 2" :\
-N
'24th Street, between Cherry Avenue and the I -1S
'
Freeway ;and is presently undeveloped,,, Said °
-• property is currently designated as Very Low
i. Residential "YL "; and , x
(b) That the proposed project is suitable for Ure
uses.-perTitted ,in the proposed district in
9
terns of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area,' and
•- (c) That the proposed amendment wnuld not have
-
significant.impacts on the environment nor the
surrounding properties; and
(d) That the proposed amendment is in conformance
with the General Plan.
4. The City.Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves
the application.
S. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988.
� 73
c' i
s
ORDINANCE 1;0. / i
CITY COUNCIL 'ORRDINANCE,NO.,
ESPA 88-05
October 19, 1988
Page 2
2. The proposed district change would not have significant
adverse impacts on the environment nor_the surrounding
properties; and
3. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan. -
4. A Mwster Plan - designation is needed to ensure the proper
coordination or a phased,development of the site.
Section 4: The City Council
aoves desi nation ifrom 'VL"c(VeryPlow)t0a
acre) to 'GC' (General Commercial)'
acres of land hated south of.24th
Freeway; and from 'FC' (Freeway, Coe
a Master Plan designation for 6.5 a
Cherry Avenue and the 1 -15 Freeway,
'ity of Rancho Cucamonga hereby'
IB-05 cha
nging the District ,
31dential (1- 2•dwellinn units per
caster Plan designation for 57.5+
between Cherry Avenue and the I -15
to -VGC' (General Commercial) with
land at the westerly coUunction of
Cucamonga. California.
section
and s hall cause the same toCber published ewithin fifteens( 5)o days iafter iits
ee
passage at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation
publisheG in the City of r o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988.
75
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1980
TO: itiyor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-038
Wrequest to amend tne Land Use
p of nera lan from 'Park" to 'Very Low'
Re_idential (less than two dwelling units per acre) on 3.85
acres located on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of
Hillside Road - APH: 1061- 691 -11.
I. RLC NDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City
ounc approve General Plan Amendmenx 88 -038. In addition, the
Planning Comissior determined that no significant environmental
impacts would result fi'= implementing the land use changes and the
Planning Comission recommends that the City Council grant a
Negative Declaration for the application.
II. BACKGROUND: General Plan Amendment 88 -038, was hoard and
recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on September 28,
1988. This Amendment is in actualit,� a land use interpretation/
determination. According to the City s General Plan, future Parks
are a fleeting designation, allowing for the proper identification
of a location at the time of City acquisition. This alloas the City
the freedom to negotiate a physically suitable location at a
reasonable cost.
In this particular case the Planning Commission concurred with both
Planning and Community Services Department Staffs' determination
that the subject site is not adequate from an access and site
configuration stand point.
The Planning Commission recommended that the park designation would
not be removed but repositioned to the Intersection of Sapphire
Street and Hillside Road. ThiA lccatiot would identify the need for
a park in this general area (one mile radius of its designated
location). When land becomes available and is acquired, the
designation will be shifted to be site - specific.
III. FACT FOR FINDINGS: Based upon the conclusions listed in the
attached ann ng Comission Staff Report of September 28th and
Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -190, the City Council can make
the following findings regarding this application:
CITY "CWNCO' -1 FP R
GPA 88 -038 - ,QUIUM
October'19,` 1988
'Page 2
1'<
1. Th e, property., is, suitable for its integded use in terms of
access and.ciroulation onto existing streets:
2. The propostCAmendmeet woutd'not have arty adverse enviromental
impacts on.nd-to.the- surrounding area.,
3. The 'Tproposedg.Amendment is consistent with the goal and
objectives. of the-.Geeeral Plae. .
IY. ACTION: If the City`Council Concurs with the recommendation_ of the
FTan�og Commission for.approval of tbw reneral'P1an'Amendment 88-
03B, the adoption of tho'attiched Rev on would be appropriate.
Re tfull i d,
ad 1 er
C1 tan
BB:JG:jmb
Attachments: Planning Commission Report, September 28, 1988
Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1988
Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -190
Exhibit A -1
City Council Resolution
177
r..
2
1
s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 28, 1988
TO: Planning Coimsission /City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONRENTAL'ASSESSMERT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-038
- ?ENT A request to —am-0— etTTino'
se p Or rhe Ganeril Plan from park to Very Lou
Residential (less than two units per acre) for 3.85 acres
located on the cast side of Sapphire Street, south of
Hillside Road - APR: 1061591 -11.
RELATED FILE: TENTATIVE TRACT 13359
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Existfr.g Sing8le Fmily Residential, zoned for Very
Low Residential, (2 dwelling units per acre)
South - Existing Single Family Residential, zoned for Very
Low Residential, (2 dwelling units par acre)
East - Existing School, Storl Elementary School, zones for
Very Lev Residential, (2 dwelling units per acre
Nest - Existing Single Family Residential, zoned for Vsry
Low Residential, (2 dwelling units per atre)
B. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Park designation, subject to the footnote -
indicated at the bottom of the Land Use
Map.
Morth - Very Low Residential, (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
South . Very Low Residential, (less than 2 dwelling units per
act*)
East - Existing School
Nest - Very Low Residential, (less than 2 duelling units par
acre)
C. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant, however,
It is adjacent o the Stork Elementary School on the east
side. Surrounding the reet of the site to Single Faintly
/78
G
"ITY COURCIL STAFF REPORT
9gGPA 88 -03° - QUITESSENCE DEVELOPMENT
Pagee2 er 28, 1988
Residential. The frontage and access to the site is on
Sapphire Street. The lot Is a flag cto the site
with n
fro ntage on Sapphire Street of 40 feet. In addition, the site
has an approved Tract Map 13359.
II. ENVIROW401TAL ASSESSMENT:
Staff has completed the Initial Study and reviewed the
Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has
found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a
result of the proposed General Plan Amendment 88 -038:
anticipated that any issue of vehicular traffic impacts m It is
t be
successfully mitigated at the development project level.
III. STAFF ANALYSIS:
The requested amendment will change the sita's designation from
Park' to 'Very Low Residential.• The park's designation location
is subject to change according to a footrcte illustrated below the
Land Use Plan Map, of the General Plan. The footnote as shown on
the General Plan Map indicates. 'The sites shown may not be
currently owned nor is the location site specific. The depiction
Of a site is an indication of a projected future need that may be
adjusted over time as the City and the School District develop.'
Furthermore, Lhe Coamunity Services Department acknowledged in 1981
to Arlan Walton, former owner of the site, see Exhibit C, that the
City is not interested in the subject location for a pork. In
addition, the' City is currently not Interested in the site for a
Park because of its s0•11 size (3.85 acres) and limited access to
the site.
In conclusion, the Park will remain a float'ng designation because
I park is needed in the general area of the subject site. If the
,amendment is approved, ;taff will reposition th,2 designation at the
intersection of Sapphfre Street and Hillside Road on the General
Plan's Land Use MoD• Th is will provide for a park site 1n the
general area without designating a specific site for its to in on
IV. FACTS F0 =�5,
General Plan Amendment 88 -038 will not be detrimental to the
adjacent properties or cause signiffcant adverse environmental
Impacts. Should the Pianning Commission determine that the
amendment would promote the land use goals and purpose of the
General Plan, the following ffndingc may le made for approval:
A. The subject property is found to be suitable for the intended
land use of the amendment.
121
CITY COUACIL�STAFF REPORT
GPA'88- 030% = QUITESSENCE DEVELOPMENT
Sentember 28, 1988
Page 3
B. The intended land use is found to be compatible with the
surrounding areas' in terms of access, vehicular /pedestrian w
ctrculat�ion and intensity.
C. Ito proposed amendment will not have any- adverse enviromental
impacts that can-not be mitigated.
0. The amendment shall be in conformance with the goals and
objective of the'Gentral Plan. s
Y. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
n e a lie ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices
sent to a proper owners wi',hin 300 feet of the project site.
vI. RECOMENDAT10N: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
adopt e�fched Resolution recommending approval of General Plan
Amendment 88-038 to the City council and issue a Relative
Declaration, thereby allowing the designation to change from Park`
to very Low Residential.
Raspectfuily submitted,
; Brad Bu ler
City Planner
} BB:JG:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit W - General Plan Map
Exhibit '8" - Site Map
Exhibit °C" - Letter
Resolution
m
( ge)
Figure III -1
LAND USE PLAN
RESIDENTIAL
O
VERY LOW <2 DU1JnC
O
LOW 2.4 aru4e
O
LOW- PAEDIUM 4.8mrsmc
=
MEDIUM a -u DV./Ac
®
MED)UM -HIGH 14.24 Dirac
HIGH 24.30UWAC
®
MASTER PLAN REOUIRED
COMMERCIAL /OFFICE
COMMERCIAL
O
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
O
NEWBORHOOD COMM.
•w
REGIONAL COWERCIAL
E
OFFICE
INDUSTRIAL
t-� INDUSTRIAL PARK
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
00 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
OPEN SPACE
O HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL
= OPEN SPACE
C� FLOOD CONTROL/ UTILITY COI
"-� SPECIAL BOULEVARD
PUBLIC FACILITIES
eNJ EXISTING SCHOOLS
FrFftl PROPOSED SCHOOLS'
L=f PARKS'(ExsTm PAw s"owN *P')
O CIVIC/COMMUNITY
CATY OF FANCHO CUCAMONGA
GENERAL PLAN
<► ^.,, -,
IN....r�.rr...q �.. r....'r... �r M...u.. i.r w�
a. v�.r•..�� .r...rrrr..�r..-U.w 1�M1lP,ll
CITY i O
RA' CIS CLCAMOWA.
PLA.•Y>ti1NC DWEM
ITEM, GPA 88 -038 QUINTESSENCE
TITLE, GENERAL PLAN MAP
EXHIBIT, _A— SCALE+._
/S/
W 9.
CITY OF rrEM, GPA 88 -OPB DUINTESSENCE
IZA.NCI CI AIMONGA TITLE, SITE MAP
PLrWNlNG D[VLSfQN
EXHIBIT, - @__SCALE. NONE
Y.
� � C
O}
U >
W"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• / m ramp 0.3.bhr
-A:Oa U. S,Idre Iwb.Umd'
1u„C.lr . 1nbW,l,At.be
June 17, 1901
>` Arlan Helton
5675 Sapphire
pM- Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Dear Hr. Halton:
This letter is sent confirming discussions between yourself and
this writer regarding potential location of a park upon your property
at and adjacent to 5675 Sapphire in Rancho Cucamonga.
While the General Plan shows an indication of a park upon your
" property, this is merely symbolic of locating it in that `general"
+. area. Upon $Pacific site analysis of your property when considering
factors of: access, surrounding and directly adjacent land uses; and,
mitigation to any adverse impacts possibly created by the introduction.
of a park, It is felt that the use of your land f ^r a neighborhood park
is untenable.
We appreciate your generous cooperation and offer to help the City
in this undertaking of providing more park land for its residents, how-
ever, we are not considering the purchase of your property tcward that
end.
Again, thank you for your consideration.
Car Ially,
H i11am - Hol ey, �ireZto
Community Se ices 0laa• , n
WLH:nm
EXl81T C
/ E3
'hFT0FFJCERO',:1o7+ RA. NCIIOCUCA }(ONGA.CALIFORNiA91730 • (714)989.1851_
7
DESIGN R qt.- TRACT- 13442•- BAril00D- DEVELOPMENT - The design review of
n9 a eva ohs an detailed s p an or tots of 'a previous
` proved tract map consisting of 152 single family lots on 14.8 acra of
1 d to the Law Medium Density- Resldentlal.Distrlct (4-4 dwelting� nits
per c within- the'Ylctoria Planned Cosunity located ' at- the northwest
corn of Victoria Park Lane aW Kenyon Nay - APN: 227 -541 -58 to'67. 227-
551-46 60; 227 - 581 -1 to 37., 59 to 76; 227 - 591 -23, 24. .'
Y �
B. ENVIRORK AL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -28 - DAMON DECROW - The
_ deveiopment1tof a 49 �o sp a ng squares ee on acres
in the Park District (Subarea 7), located yEst of White Oak and
at the terminus,of Spruce Avenue - APR: 208- 351 -78 49.
C. TIME EXTENSION AR PARCEL NAP 8578 - SANTA FE/DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A
v s3ii ion of lif acres of a into Parue ,ss within e n uaw mpact
Heavy Irvlustrial Ards
(Subarea 9) locatedron the south side of Arrow
Router -as:t and west- of\ illiken Avenue - ON: 229 - 111 -23.
D. ENVIROMAENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT DEVIEW 88-25- LENNON ARCHITECTS -
1 ee 4tvalopment of an office, woutActuring. and ware ouse building
totaling 29,860 square feet`on 1.S A6res of land in the General Industrial
District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the
south 0de'of Sharon Circle eailr'0f Hermosa Avenue - APR: 209 - 261 -23.
E. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CONDiTIOMAL USE PERMIT 88-33 - BARTON DEVELOPMENT
e request or a Master on o�a�T Use eerrm a ow a cc na on
of specific office and wholesale uses within the Jersey Business Park,
located north of Jersey Boulevard and, st of Red Oak Avenue - APH: 209-
142-19, 20, 21. \
F. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CONDITION& USES PERMIT 88 -28 - PERRY - The
eve oilmen o a 5,915 square toot re ng on 0:52 acres of land
wiLhtn ad existing shcpping center in the Co ppity Commercial District of
the FoothilySpecifie Plan, located on the sodtinwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard nd Malachite Avenue - APN: 206- 261 -20\
Bret Horn Assistant Planner, reported that two cond tans had been added
to Item firing that fencing- design be approved by f4 City Planner and
tot. -1; adjustments for lots 1, 2 and 3 be completed p to issuance -of
buil g permits. He stated the developer had been informed o the changes.
M ion: Moved by Blakesley, seconded by Chitiea, carried 4 -0 -1, t dopt Item
"
as amaode and Itew3-through F on the Consent Calendar. -- —
I e f f f t
PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERA PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03B - QUINTESSENCE
DEYECOPREAT —A request o amen an us—T a map of enera aim
Park ro very Low Residential (less than two units per acr_) for 3.85 acres
located on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road -
` APN: 1061 - 691 -11.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 28, 1988
/ 87
Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chltiea asked for clarification of the floating park designation.
Brad Buller. City Planner, stated that where the City does not own property
but a park is desired, the General Plan identifies this desire by a floating
park designation. The proposal tonight would locate the symbol for the
floating park designation at the intersection of Sapphire Street and Hillside
Road. Although they were not currently pursuing parkland acquisition in this
immediate area, the Coamunity Services Department had indicated they would
like to retain t floating designation for that area of the City.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearinq.
Jim Kibbie, 5707 Turk Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he was concerned that
once the land designation was lost as park land, it would be gone forever. He
also expressed concerns with the drainage.
Joe Qainn. Quintessence Development, agreed with the staff report. He stated
they felt the parcel had limited access and that it was not suited for a
park. He felt that within a one -mile radius there were parcels better -suited
for a park.
Debbi Eggleston, 6844 Nevada Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she was concerned
that if the park designation was moved to a corner, eventually the City would
be out of land with no park having been built.
As there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Chairman McNiel stated he felt that although there were not very many
remaining suitable park sites in that area, this particular site was also not
suitable because of limited street access.
Coamissioner Chitiea stated the subject tract of land was land - locked with the
exception of one street. She felt the park should have more visibility for
safety purposes and for attracting use. She felt the City should try to
locate and negotiate for a larger piece of land.
Chairman McNiel asked if Comunity Services had a sense of priority fir a park
in the general area.
Mr. Buller indicated there was interest in obtaining a park In the area, but
the recent focus was on looking for parks to the northeastern quadrant of the
City where there were currently no parks.
Commissioner Blakesley agreed the subject site was not suitable for a park.
He supported the floating designation because he felt a park was needed in the
general vicinity.
Comissioner Tolstoy sated the physical constraints of the property dictated
It be used for other than a park. He also stated he folt the drainage
question had been adequately addressed at a previous hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 28, 1988
=e
area. He requested that corre pc�pnce ritha Comwdefinitely nt ervicees De that
indicating the Planning Commission s support for a park in'that area.
Mr. Buller stated staff would send a memo to Community Services.
Coommissio er woretfaw tatedblhis was particularly important at this time
parcels of land in that area.
Notion: loved by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesiey, to adopt the Resolution
recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment
88 -038. Notion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: KONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK
-carried
I.
awe111ng units per acre to General Covercl�Ytore57 6y
ac S^ot land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the
I -I5 •FFreeway. The planning Commission will consider other appropriate
GeneraF�Land Use categories (Neighborhood Commercial
226 - 121 -08, 11, 12 and 226 - 112 -oa_ , and Office) - APN:
' the other ann�nn.l.i. i
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report,
Chairman MCNiel opened the public hearing.
Oirk Johnston, 2402 Michelson, Irvine, representing Unitex, stared they agreed
with the staff report.
As Ll:y� were no further comments, the public hearing was closed, t
Planning Commission Minutes -4- ,
September 28, 1988
E
RESOLUTION NO. 88_190
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOIMENDING APPROVAL OF
THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8&038 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FROM PAID( TO VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (2 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) ON 3.85 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF
SAPPHIRE STREET, SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA NO MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
Plan Amendment Notn 88- 038aas vdescribedhin fthed tain t le pofcathis Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred
to as 'the application'.
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a my noticed hpublicnhearin®onsthe application.
(fill (fill All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred,
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
set forthlin etRecitals, Part A, of specifically Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon sub:antial evidence presented to this Comeission
during the above- refer_nced public hearing on September 28, 1988, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Coamisston hereby specifically finds as follows:
land, basicallyaa flag configuration, applies ated eastpsidelofLSapphire, south of
Hillside Road and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated
as Park, however, subject to footnote at bottom of Land Use Map of General
Plan, and
designated Very bLow Resident ale(less to than e2 dwelling g of the units per jacre) and is
vacant. The property to the west is designated Very -Low Residential (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre) and is developed Single Family Residential.
The property to the east is designated School and is an existing school
site. The property to the south is designated Very-Low Residential (less than
2 dwelling units per acre) and is developed Single Family iomes.
g7
PLANNING COYIISS. RESOLUTION No. 88 -190
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-038
Page 2
(c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will nut provide for development, within the
district, in a manner consistent with the General Plrn and with related
development; and
(d) This amendent promotes- the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
(e) Tits amendment would not - be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and wa:ld not have a significant impact
on the envionment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative
Oeclara•'ran be issued.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set fo•a in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the subject property is suitable for the
uses permitted to the Proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area; and
(b) That the proposed amendment would not have
significant impacts on the environment nur the
surrounding properties; and
(c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance
with the General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, recommends Certification of a Negative leclaration to
the City Council.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section
65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 28th day of September,
1988, General Plan Amendment No. 88 -03B.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
l ��
m:
PLANNING�COM ,'ly:s'��*:;`:9��Y�,,.k�K <• �- �°- ,=h. . �,.'pya ".; -- •= ��'�s��.i
ISSIr , RESOLUTION N0.
GENERAL PLAN ANEk1 -'-NT 88-03B 86'190 y
Pago 3 :wti
r:
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMTER', 1988.
PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMM
rar
is r
V D �
ra u r ocr a '
I, Brad Busier, Secretary`-Of- the Planning Caaaaission of the City ofi Rancho
Cucaaan�a, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was, duly and
City of Rancho Cucamonga Sat A` regularPieetinyy ofetheaPlannfngCgCfssfOnonfhthe
on the 28th day of Sep.eeber 1988, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONEPS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NORE
AB3EAi: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK
h.
1
CITY OF
RANUIO CUCANKYNCA
PLANNING IXVLSM
Ige)
rfyl, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88.035
PROPOSEU GENERACTI-A-9-
'j rr,Ei LAND USE DESIGNATION
EXHIBrr, A•! SCALE.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 — lD
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
G. CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
c 88 -038 TO CHANGE THE LARD USE DESIGNATION FROM PARK TO
VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON 3.85
ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET, SOUTH OF
w HILLSIDE N
SUP THERECFC�, CALIFORNIA AND MAKING
A. Recitals.
a
z (i) Quintessence Development has filed an application for General
Plan Amendment No. 88 -03B as described in the title of this Resolution.
i Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred
t, to as "the application'.
(ii) On September :9, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and issued Resolution No. 88 -190 recommending to this City Council that said
application be approved and that a Negative Declaration be issued.
SJ (iii) On October 19, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho
S, Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior
to its adoption of this Resolution.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this R•asolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certified that project has been
reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 (and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative
Declaration).
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above - referenced public hearing on October 19, 1980, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to approximately 3.85 acres of
land, basically a flag configuration, located on the east side of Sapphire,
south of Hillside Road and is presently vacant. Said property is currently
designated as Park; and
�ql
r
1
x
9
CITY COIINCIRESOLUTI011 NOJ88
GEWERAL PLAIT ANEIOIiEIfT 8&038
October 19, 1988
Page 2
(b) That the subject property 1s suitable for the uses
permitted in the Proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use In the surrounding area; and
(c) That the proposed amendment would rot haro significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding Properties; and
General Plan. (d) That the' proposed amerdment is in conform r,:e with the
4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves
the application.
S. The City Clerk shall certify to'`the adoption of this Resolatlon.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of October, 1988
-k
,r
•1'
t
11 M
i
a,.
r
i
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO : Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Mik1 Bratt, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELMMENT BLOCK GRANT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
FOR 1989 -1991 - To identify need for housing assistance in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Devolopment
I. RECOHNENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached
eso u on approving the Housing Assistance Plan for 1989 -1991.
I1. BACKGROUND: Federal regulations require all jurisdictions to
prepare a detailed Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) once every throe
years to evaluate and coordinate the various housing programs and
policies operated by the jurisdiction to ensure their
effectiveness.
The last HAP covered the 1985 - 1988 period. The attached HAP
addresses the 1989 to 1991 period, lie plan meets all of the
requirements of the federal regulations regarding format and
content.
The information in the HAP has been coordinated with the update of
the City's housing element of the General Plan, and with the update
of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment by the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAB).
'II PUBLIC REVIEW: Federal regulations require a duly noticed public
ear n9 a ore adopting the HAP, in order to ensure that City
residents have the opportunity to suggest changes to the proposed
Programs and goals. Notice was published on October 7, 1988.
Re 11Y boy eed (/ �
Br er
City P nner
BB:MB:mlg
/3
I
CITY COUNCIL ST /fF REPORT
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
October 19,1988
Page 2
Attachments Housing Assictance Plan 1989 -1991
Resolution Approving the Housing Assistance Plan for 1989-
1991
)q4
PAOMI
TENURE
rYPE
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN j„
s.
T
TO: 9 -30 -91 H
4A
10 OIJ9InSI ❑Rnld°n ❑Ammdmmt lSMUNtl Y /AYNwn/W Ol/rswq l
lD�ul
PART 1 - HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS
TABLE I - HOUSING STOCK CONDITIONS
STANOARDUNITS S
SUBSTANDARD UNITS S
SUBSTANDARD UNITS SUITABLE FOR REHAB
o=UIIBO O
VACANT O
OCCITS V
VACANT V
OCNFIBO YNIT• V
VACANT
Told L
LeHtr lnmrlw
UNITS U
UNITS U
UNITS U
UHIi• U
UNITS
w• e
e _
_— _
_•— -
- -E —_ —_ -
--d--
TABLE 11 - RENTAL SUBSIDY NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
AMLL F
ELDERLY SMALLP
Y f LAROFPANRY f— TOTAL
PART H THREE YEAR GOAL
TABLE I - UNITS TO BE ASSISTED
EHAOILITATION NEW CONVER]ION tO ISMIE
wllI I>O lR•19 C0113TflUCT10N FE,
(UNITS I - - -T IWflOVtMENTS
(UNITS EXPECTED TO ASSIST LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS)
0 0 75
-i- I nD- o I I' -- b -- -
TABLE II - LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO RECEIVE RENTAL SUBSIDIES
ELDERLY SHALL FAMILY LARGE PANTY TOTAL
A 10 W Al
-130 -_ 25 175 14 T um
TABLE 111 - GOALS FOR HUD RESOURCES: SUBJECT TO LOCAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
ELDERLY SMALL FAMILY 'LARGEFAMILY TOTAL
I IU —W —
HOUSING TYPE PREFERENC_E!M•Ahlun NMnDrr of Units tAM w_p/ b AmpttY//
NEW EXISTING
+ if tA•pplfc•nt wish" tOlW w SUn NrwdnSAPmcPPEopmdt w+tAln /tt Arnt6ctim -
-_ PART III - GENERAL LOCATION
7
it
zo l
j§!!|
`
|
.
(
7 k
3Em
i2
� §I
d
3 :1
�
}5i£ \�
�!r
) k0�
•
.m
7
it
rr
v
•NOTE (Fuctnote to Table II ,_line 19, and Table III, line 21.)
The goal for HUD assisted housing show: only 20 units for the elderly consistent with
the proport[tm of needs end,avallable'fundL This goal Is too small to allow fora
feasible senior citizen project. 'A goal large enough to accommodate a feasible - a
development, In order to maintain propor(lonality by family type, would necessitate
1. total goals which are extremely unrealistic both In relation to need and to available
resources. Therefore, If an assisted elderly housing development Is proposed for an ' "`
appropriate area of the city ' that Is accessible to public transportationtshops and
services), the City of Ranch Cucamonga will consider amending Its HAP to
accommodate the project and will at that time request a waiver of proportionality
requirements based on reasonable level of effort and past performance.
JOU/01g04•Narr 1 /q
V /
-Y4 ✓ f n.r„��tr
Z
t.
R
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION OF HOUSING ASSISTANCB NEEDS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1989-91 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN '
L DEFINITION OF SUBSTANDARD
!' Units are considered to be substandard If they do not meet the requirements of the
housing quality standards of the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program.
n
B. DEFINITION OF UNITS SUITABLE FOR REHABILITATION
Housing units are generally considered suitable for rehabilitation If they are
structurally sound and the cost of rehabilitation will not exceed the lower of the
following measurer.
• 80 percent of replacement cost of the unit/structure.
• 80 percent of the market value after rehabilitation.
An exception may be made In the rase of local historic landmarks.
EL ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS (Le,
THOSE EARNING LESS THAN 80 PERCENT OF THE RIVERSIDE-SAN
BERNARDINO AREA MEDIAN INCOb1E) EXPECTED TO RESIDE IN
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
The estimates for the number of additional lower Income households expected to
reside (ETR) In Rancho Cucamonga by 1991 are derived from the Regional Housing
Needs Assessment (RHNA) prepared by the Southern California Association of
Governments. Since the RHNA covers the 5 -year period from 1989 to 1994, the
distribution for the HAP was prepared by HUD, Economic and Market Analysis
Division (EMAD) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
IV- ASSOM ENT OF THE IMPACT OF CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS
Although there was some conversion of rental housing to condominiums prior to 1983,
there has been no Interest In conversion In recent years. Rather, there has been a
revival of construction of apartments. Rancho Cucamonga's condominium ordinance
limits conversions to no more than one -half the number of rental units added to the
!OB /01804 -Narr - 2 /(�P
0
housing stock within the preceding year. No displacement Is expected as a result of
conversions during the 1086 to 1951 HAP period.
V. 111314ORrrY HOIE@iOLD NEWS
Estimates of minority housing needs were updated based on Information provided by
Jerry Nakano of HUD, EMAD. Displacement Is not expected to be a problem over
the next 3 years because the city avolds displacing residents and there Is enough
vacant hand that private developers do not need to redevelop and remove existing
units.
A. Black
• 1.
Lower Income households In substandard housing: 12 owners, 2 renters.
2.
Lower Income households requiring rental subsidies: 2 elderly, 16 small
family, and 4 large family.
3.
Lower Income households to be displaced. none.
,. B. pr OHKta
1.
F
Lower Income households In substandard housing: 74 owners, 14 renters.
2.
Lower Income households requiring rental assistance: 21 elderly,
221 small family, 55 large family.
3.
Lower Income households to be displaced: none.
C. Native American
1.
Lower Income households In substandard housing: 4 owners, I renter.
2.
Lower income households requiring rental subsidies: 1 elderly, 1S small
family, 4 large family.
3.
Lower Income households to be displaced: none.
D. Asinn or PaWIe islander
1. lower Income households In substandard housing: 10 owners, 2 renters.
2. Lower Income households requiring rental subsidies. 1 elderly, 14 small
family, 4 large family.
3. Lower Income households to be displaced: none.
IJOE /01804 -inner 3
r(
t
;I
M
z�
M
E. Total MIMdtT Hoaxholds
1. Lower Income minority households in substandard housing: 100 owners,
10 renters.
2. Lower Income minority households requiring rental subsidies: 25 elderly,
266 small family, 67 large family.
3. No lower Income minority households are expected to be displaced.
VL HANDICAPPED HOUSING NFr
Estimates of households with disabled members In need of housing assistance are
based on the 1980 census and -data provieed by HUD, EMAD.
0 1980 disabled households: 1,341 households (8.9 percent).
0 1988 disabled households: 2,656 households (8.9 percent).
Low and moderate Income (less than 80 percent of median) handicapped households
requirbig rental assistance:
0 8 elderly.
0 46 one - person, nonelderly households.
0 149 small families.
0 37 large families.
Special needs Handicapped households need housing units with access ramps and
wider doorways, assist bars bt the bathrooms, lower cabinets, elevators (In two or
more story buildings) and special lighting and safety features (In the case of the blind
and deaf).
VIL SINGLE PARENT HOUSEHOLDS
Estimates of the number of single parent households needing assistance are based on
the 1980 census data.
1080 Percent 1988 Total single parent housenolds
1,055 6.8 2,029
Female headed 823 5.3 1,583
1C8/01804 -Narr
s
4 Daa
db�
Lower income single parent households 323 30.9 627
Pamalo headed
1 269 28.6 538
y : Needing rental wariMwnre 126 36.0 243
iu7T Female headed ,0: 31.1 195
Special Housing Ne-ds: Single parents wltii dependent children need housing which Is
le
,K. =• af'Irdable and located close-to day rare centers, schools; and parks and recreation
facilities. The 1960 census Indicated that a disproportionate number of the
households headed by single women live below the poverty level, and are paylni more
a4 than 30 percent of their Incomes for housing. ,
4 VIII. OTHER SPECIAL HOLGWG NEEDS OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME
.'• 1fOUSEMLDS
i
There are no other special housing needs for loiv end moderate Income households in
Rancho Cucamonga.
K
1M: METHODOLOGY
r
.', An explanation of the methodology used to derive the figures on the HAP Ls on flle In
the Planning Division.
0;
�z.
4.Y y
h
i,
X
i
J
JOW0180E -Narr 5 !'
COMMUNCIT DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRA?IT
NARRA7NB rOR 3-YEAR AND 1 -YRAR GOALS
1989 -1991 ROUSING ASSLSrANCB PLAN
CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMCNGA
L DITOLACBhniNN
No standard units are expected to be demolished or toner Income households
relocated as a result of direct federal, state, or local actions.
A.
5
I. Rancho Cucamonga§ condomkilum conversion ordinance limits
i conversions to no more than half the number of rental units added to the
i. housing stock within the recedl
D ng year, And requires that all converted
units ul ut current code requirements. No conversions are expected over
the next 3 years.
IL
2. The City will design all public facility projects (street wideniags, norm
drainage Improvements, etc.) to avoid displacing any households. ,40
houses will be removed unless affordable replacement housing Is
available.
3. No CDDG funds will be used for projects which will displace low Income
residents.
1 Rancho Cucamongas condominium conversion. ordinance limits
coaverslors to no Moro than half the number of rental units added to the
housng stock within the preceding year, and requires that all converted
units meet current code requirements. No '.nversions are expected over
the next 3 years.
JOB /01804 -Nary 6
2. The city will design all put•llc facility pr0Jccts (street wldentnIM storm
drainage Improvements, etc.) to avoid displacing any households No
.. houses will be removed unless affordable replacement huuoing is
available.
3. No CDNG funds will be used for projects which will displace moderate
Incoole residents.
8. A FORDS LH PDESRRVH OR FXPAND TAH AVAILABILITY OF
Aa PORDADLH HOCbD�`t,`
A.
1. The city wBl continue to support the Section 8 scattered site new
construction program for households coming less than SO percent of the
r regional median Income to produce units affordable to them.
2. The city will continue to enforce Its condominium convarslon ordinance
(described above).
3. Although in rem (tax foreclosure) proceedings are very uncommon In
Rancho Cucamonga, the city will invcntigate the possibility of Increasing
the supply of affordable housing using Property acquired In that way, and
establish a system to handle such propertles, should they become
available.
4. State law requires cities to offer Incentives (including public
Improvements or density bonuies) to any protect with at least 10 percent
of the units affordable to low income households. The developer commits
to develop a percentage of units at prices or rents• affordable to lower
Income households, In exchange for city Incentives.
S.
Twenty percent cf tax Increment funds from the city`s redevelopment
Projects will be used to assist low and modernte Income housing
development as neceSsary and as funds become available. Funds are
currently committed to other p %ects, but will be available In the future.
JOB/01804 -Narr
ao.3
Y:
1
A
1. The city will continue to participate In the funding of revenue bonds for
tie construction of rental housing where 20 percent of the units are set
aside for households earning less than 80 percent of the regional median
Income at rents affordable to them.
2. The city will conMue to enforce its condominium conversion ordinance
(described above).
3. Although In ram (tax foreclosure) proceedings are very uncommon In
Rancho CucamDW, the city Will investigate the possibility Of Increasing
the supply of affordable ho,tsing using property acquired In that way and
establish a system to handle such propertle% should they become
available.
4. State law requires cities to offer Incentives (Including public
improvements m density bonuses) to any project with at least 25 percent
the units affordable to low and moderate Income households. several or
the Planned communities In Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments for
the development of affordable housing In the text of the approvea or
proposed community plan. The developer commits to develop a
percentage of emits at prices or rents affordable to moderate Income
households, in e:rchange for city Incentives.
5. Twenty percent of tax Increment funds from the city s redevelopment
Projects will to used to assist low and moderate Income housing
development m. necessary and as funds become available. Funds are
currently committed to other projects, but will be available in the future.
8. The city will amtinue to offer density bonuses and parking reductions to
senior citizen housing projects In which at least 25 percent of the units
are reserved for lower Income households at rents they can afford.
300 /01804 -Nar
R DDy
M ACTIONS THE CrrY WILL TAKE TO IMPLEmorr ris ONE AND THREE
YEAR COALS
A. Movbmae Revenue Boa&f2! ner2
San Bernardino County Economic and Community Development Department (by
cooperation agreement) and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency sell
mortgage bonds to provide below market rate mortgage financing for first -time
homebulers. Most users will not be low or moderate Income that Is, coming less
than 80 percent of the regional median. Issues funding an estimated 1,500 mortgages
were sold between 1980 and 1986. The goal will be realized, therefore, subject only
to market condltloas and the developer's ability to develop and sell the homes.
B. Multiple- Pamlly Revenue Boods (Reubs�
By cooperation agreement with the County of Son Bernardino, rental projects In
y; Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted to lower Income
households at affordable rents may be funded with county multiple- famlly rental
revenue bonds. According to the San Bernardino County Department of Economic
and Community Development, some 385 units have been funded but not yet built.
However, market conditions and developer performance will dictate whether the
units committed are completed.
C. CDBG RehabWtatkuo loess
Through a contract with the County of Sao Bernardino. the city offers low Interest
and deterred rehabilitation loans to lower Income homeowners citywide.
Approximately 6 units per year or 18 units will be brought up to standard through this
Program. and the Senior Emergency Repair Grant program described below.
Rental rehabilitation loans are given only to structures with four or fewer units
where the owner or the tenants are lower Income. Rents after rehabilitation must be
affordable. Up to five units will be brought up to standard through this program.
JOB /01804 -Narr 9 �/ls
D. Seaton BmMMT Rcaas Groats
Through a contract with San Bernardino County, the city offers emergency repair
services to low and moderate (less than 80 percent of the regional median Income).
Approximately 25 units per year, or 75 units In total will be assisted through this
program.
S. Section a Bxtstlmr (or Successor Proeram)
The city has entered a cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the
y County of San Bernardino to administer the Section 8 existing and housing voucher
' programs. The goals reflect the reduced funding for this preg:am and the fact that
x rents In the city are often higher than fair market rents However, there Is a good
potential of using Section 8 existing In the density bonus affordable housing to be
produced as a part of the large planned developments under construction In the city,
r
as well as In the projects using the senior housing overlay district or the rental
_h rehabilitation loan program.
F. Article XXXIV Referendum Authority
The voters of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a referendum allowing public
ownership or financing of low rent housing pursuant to Article XXXN of the State
Constitution. This enables use of public housing and various multiple- tamlly
financing programs. There are currently 11 units of scattered site public housing in
the city.
The city has entered Into a cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the
County of San Bernardino for use of the public housing program. No funding Is
anticipated for this program In the first housing assistance plan year. However,
agreements are In place should funding become available.
G. Affordable Homan Incentives
State law requires cities to offer Incentives (Including public Improvements or
density !anuses) to any project with at least 10 percent affordable to low Income or
25 percent of the units affordable to moderate Income households. Several of the
7013/01804 -Narr 10 Do(
Planned omunitles In Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments for the
developw •• affordable housing In the text of the approved or proposed
community plan. The developer commits to develop a Percentage of units at prices
or rents affordable to lower income households, In exchange for city Incentives
H. Redevelopment
Twenty percent of tax increment funds from the city's redevelopment projects will
be used to assist low Income housing development as necessary and as funds become
available. These funds are currently committed to other Projects but will become
available In the future.
i�
L Senior ffott5lax Overlay Dlttrict
The city of Rancho Cucamonga has created an overlay zone for senior citizen
housing projects which gives the developer higher densities and reduced parking
requirements In exchange for reserving a portion of the units for low and moderate
Income seniors at affordable rents.
N. EXPECTED A4PEDfAffi•fIS AND PLANNED REA1EDfE5
A. Problem: High Land Costs Increase the Cast of Hoesiag In Rancho
Coramante _.
Remedy: The city will continue to offer a variety of programs which taken together
can •esult In affordable housing:
1. Density bonuses and the senior housing overlay dish lct.
2. Revenue bond financing.
3. Public funding of Infrastructure Improvements (streets, storm drains,
water and sewer lines) to support new development
B. Emblem: Reduced Federal Funding for Hnusimt Promms and Protect!;
Remedy: The city will use 20 percent of the tax Increment funds generated by Its
redevelopment projects to Increase the supply of affordable housing, after current
commitments of those fund; are met.
JOB /01804 -Nary 11 �d�
Y. ASSURANCE THAT- AT LEAST 60 PERCENT OF THE UNITS
REHABILITATED_ wrTH CDW FUNDS WILL BFNurr LOW AND
MODERATE INCONS HOUSEHOLDS
All applicants for below - market Interest rate (BMIR) loans, deferred loans, or
emergency repair grants are required to submit evidence that their Income meets
ellgiblUty requirements. This information Is checked by program administrators at
San Beraardlno County Economic and Community Development Department and by
the bank which processes the loans. All homeowners mus: earn Uss then 80 percent
of the regional medlan In order to participate In the program.
B. Rent�ledUnits
The city's rental rehabilitation loan program Is designed to ensure that the majority
of the units rehabilitated are affordable to and rented by lower Income households.
If the property owner Is applying becsuse he or she Is lower Income, he or she Is
required to submit evidence of Income. The owner is also asked to submit annually a
copy of all leases or rental agreements (to verify rents charged) and a signed
certif ication of Income from each tenant. The city will periodically conduct Its own
surveys to assure that Income Information Is accurate and rents are affordable.
VL GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR ASSISTED HOUSING
Please see the attached map.
JOB/01804-Nary 12 D06
,
$r
F F
s
� o•
O
a g
f�7111111
z
� J1
e�
W i doe
N ii g
II o11
F
J
Q
r��
N %-
o
(0 =
U =
a
�.
co
m
is
�T
N I~ch
(�i T
o�
C
ago
UcaE
c
U
U
316 i
�m
0 (-
AM HODOLOQCAL NOTES
190.1991
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PV.N
CITY OF RANC1iO Ct1CANONGA
PART 1: HOUSIf4G AS WANCR NEED6
TABLE I - 40 SING STOCK COmmoNs
This labia addresses the conr•Itlon of the cx"tin housing stock. The Information was
updated to 1988 using State Department of Finance estimates for January 1, 1988,
Plus new construction through September 30, 1988. The Proportion owner- occupled,
renter- occupled units and vacant units were taken from the 1980 census and applied
to the October 1, 1988 :stim8tes. The number of Substandard units Is the some as
the previous HAP, since the residential market is so strong that It Is unlikely that
any more units have become substandard.
TABLE B - RENTAL NEEDS OP LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
This table Includes both existing needs and the needs expected to result from lower
income households moving to Rancho Cucamonga- Jerry Nakano, an economist In the
Los Angeles P.UD Office, provided the estimates for these existing needs shown on
linen 8, 9, 10 and 11. Future needs, or those lower Income households RTR In
Rancho ^.ucamonge, and shown In line 11 are based on the figures contained la the
RHNA developer: by the SCAC.
No residential units are expected to be demolished as a result of federal, state, or
local protects within Rancho Cucamonga over the next 3 years. Therefore, line -12
shows zeros.
PART D: THREE -YEAR GOA L
TABLE f - UNITS TO BE ASSISTED
Column L - Rehabilitation Of Substandard units. This goal was based on the past
Performance of the rehabilitation loan program and emergency repair grants which
bring the unit Into compliance with Section 8 Housing quality Standards. A 5 -unit
JOB/01804 -Nair - 13 j (�
a. goal for rehabilitation of reutal units Is Included In recogn)tlon/hape that the new
rental rah bWtatlea program operated by the San Bernardino County Wth Rancho
Cucamonga, also, CDBC funds will be used by property o-Mers. This is a )Onserva-
tive goal which we should be able to meet. Since all participants must be sower
100001o, the figures for lines 15 and More the same as those for lines 17 and lh
I
Colman M - New Construction. The 9031s of this column reflect the revenue -bond
funded projects which have been approved and for which financing Is available. Since
the tax law has changed, there are not likely to be any more of these units. The
figure represents projects for which funding has been induced, but no construction
has Occurred. Only 20 percent of the rental units wM serve low or moderate Income
households (line 18); the rest will be above moderate Income.
Cofomn N - Conversion. No structures not currently N residential use are expected
to be converted to residential use.
Column O - Home Improvements. This column contains the goals for the emergency
repair program. The target Is based on continuation of current levels of activity.
Since all participants must be lower Income, the figures for Ibies 15 and 17 are the
same.
TAME B - LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO RECEIVE RENTAL SUBSIDIES
This table reflects the 30 Section 8 existing households currently in the community,
the it units of scattered site public housing, and the 200 units (40 affordable) which
will be assisted by the rental revenue land program. This Is again a conservative
goal because it is unlikely that these programs will receive additional funding over
the next 3 years. The total goal represents 0 percent of the total need shown on
line 13.
TABLE M - COALS FOR HUD RESOURCES
Line 21 Identifies the proportion of the goals In Table R which are expected to be
funded by federal (HUD) funds. Again, It reflects the existing programs and units in
the city. Line 22 Identifies the maximum number of each type of unit which will be
accepted by the city. Larger projects or a total In excess of this figure require city
and HUD approval.
JOB/01804 -Harr - 14 01r
r
x
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CIi1 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN;HO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE
PLAN FOR THE 1989 -1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
PROGRAM.
r "? A. Recitals.
S�
'y (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the
regulations governing the Federal Community Development Block Grant program;
(ii) Each entitlement City is requfrad to submit a Housing
Assistance Plan (RAP) every three years to coordinate and focus the programs
which it funds with COBG or other funds; and
t= (iii) The next lannin
p g period is October 1, 1988 to September 30,
1991; and
(iv) Staff has prepared a HAP in accordance with Federal
regulations and consistent with the Housing Eleaxnt of the Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan and with the Regional Housing Weds Assessment prepared by the
Southern California Association of Governments for the region; and
p (v) On October 17 1988, the City Council held a legally noticed
public hearing in order to give the public an opportunity to respond to the
draft plan; sod the City Council has heard pubtic'testimony and received all
public input regarding the City's Housing Assistance Plan.
B. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions:
1. Approve and adopt the Housing Assistance Plan for 1989 -1991 to
guide ttie housing programs of the Community Development Block
Grant over the next three years; and
2. Approve and adopt the one year increment of the Housing 4
Assistance Plan for the period October 1, 1988 to September 30,
1989. €
�
�I
r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TD: Mayor and members of the Cites Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Chris Yestman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT Rum 88-11 -
approva ore appea o con ons or
squaw foot two -stnry office building
on .40 acres of land on the southwest corner of Vineyard
Avenue and San Bernardino Road fiN a Community Commercial
District within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. -
APN: 207 - 102_09
I. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council deny the appeal
anff-drr—ec`fsfWf to prepare a Resolution with findings for adoption
at the next meeting.
II. BACKGROUND: The project was heard by the Planning Commission on
gus , 1968. The item was approved 5-0 as submitted with the
exception of the metal roof material. The project was conditioned
for an alterntite material to be approved by the Design Review
Committee. Attached are the staff report and minutes of the
Commission meeting.
The apolicant is appealing conditions of approval regarding:
A. Alternate roof material
8. An arbor /trellis in the plaza.
C. Engineering special conditions 1 -4.
0. Historic Preservation Commission recommendations
III ANALYSIS:
A. Roof Material: The project architect has proposed a standing
seam me roof. The Foothill Plan calls out wood shingles,
slate and metal as appropriate roof materials for this subarea
activity center (see Exhibit 'E'). However, the Planning
Commission determined that the standing seam metal roof was an
inappropriate material for this project and conditioned that
the roof material be changed to something other than metal,
ai3
t
CITY COUNCIL STAFF I
DR88 -11 - MATr r)CR--
October 19, 1988
Page 2
:k
subject to approval by the Design Review Committee. The
Planning Commission was aware that there are other buildings on
Foothill with similar metal roofs,- such as Vineyard National
Bank, Michael J's and Harry C's, but felt that metal was
inappropriate ro+f materinl for this project. The Commission
noted that tile roofing will be used on the Thomas Winery Plazs
across the street.
The project architect contests that to change the roof material
may require a roof design change. For example, certain pitches
and structural requirements are necessary to accommodate
concrete tile as a roof material.
The Foothill Specific Plan states that "the Thomas Winery is
the style determinant in this subarea ". The Thomas Winery
architecture is representative of California Barn Style with
multi - planed roofs (gable, hip and shed). The predominant roof
material ilding (the Thtallestobuilding on theasit) isl constructed iof
galvanized metal, including the roof. The proposed project
features a metal mansard roof.
B. Arbor/Trellis: The Design Review Committee during consent
ca en ar rev ew recommended the addition of an arbor /trellis
along 'he south side of the building. The Foothill Boulevard
app
Specific
priate Plan
accent calls arbors
this subarea covered
activity walkways
cent r
(see Exhibit "F"). The Design Review Committee recommended the
above to provide shade in the plaza, and to provide a design
featu,e consistent with the desired character for this area.
The proposed plaza design includes raised planters, benches and
stamped concrete paving (see Exhibit "G').
C Engineering Conditions:
1. Engineering Condition No. 1:
"An 1n -lieu fee as contribution to the future
undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities
(telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 k.v.
electrical) on the opposite side of Vineyard Avenue and San
Bernardino Road shall be paid to the City prior to the
issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half
the City adopted unit amount times the length as follows:
a. San Bernardino Road - from the west project boundary to
the center of Vineyard Avenue.
b. Vineyard Avenue - from the south project boundary to
the center of San Bernardino Road."
t
s
i.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
BR88 -11 - MATTLOCK
October 19, 1988
Page 3
This condition was briefly
Commission hearing. It was e
are to be used to reimburse c
of: (1) the undergrounding b
project on the east side of
future undergrounding on the
Road. This 1s eonsistei
Plaza, provides a rettiburs,
be entitled as provided in
scussed at the Planning
tined that the to -lieu fees
half the cost of a portion
i done by the Thomas Winery
eyard Avenue, and (2) the
Ith side of San Bernardino
with the current City
case of the Thaws Winery
o which the developer will
conditions.
2 Engineering Condition; Nos. 2 and 4 (discussed together):
No. 2: "Upgrade, modification, and relocation, as
necessary, of the traffic signal at the intersection of
Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road shall be the
responsibility of the developer.'
No. 4: 'The developer shall coordinate ✓,th the developer
of the Thomas Winery project for the design and
construction of the intersection improvements including
upgrade, relocation or modification of the traffic signals
so that the intersection will be completed as a single
project is approved by the City Engineer.'
Condition No. 2 is standard whenever street widening is
required at a signalized intersection. the developer
requested that since the Thomas Winery project on the
opposite side of Vineyard Avenue is required to perform
signal work, the condition be modified to apply only if the
Thomas Winery project is not completed. It was explained
that if all the necessary work had beer completed, it would
not be necessary for the applicant to duplicate it.
However, the Thomas Winery proje::t is required to complete
only the signal work necessary for its development. The
Thomas Winery project does not include the construction of
the curb at its ultimate location nor the relocation of the
signal pole on the applicant's side of Vineyard Avenue
Condition No. 4 merely requires that the applicant
coordinate his construction with the winery project to
minimize the disruption of the intersection.
3 Engineering Condition No. 3:
'An access easement in favor of the property to the w-st
over the north/south drive aisle and portions of the
southerly east/West drive aisle shall be provided.'
The project is within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan,
Subarea No. 2, which requires a Master Plan for the area
bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue, San
Bernardino Road and the Cucamonga Creel Channel. The
.` CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
OR88 -11 - HATTLOCK
October 19, 1988
Page 4
conceptual Hester Plan submitted by the developer proposed
a reciprocal access to the property to the west. Coidition
No. 3 merely requires that an easement be provided to
guarantee this shared reciprocal access.
D. Historic Preservation Commission Recommentdations: Three
con ons were present a ammng mmisslon as
recommendations from the Historic Preservation Commission. Two
of the conditions were applied specifically to the Thomas
House:
1. The house and if possible the garage shall be moved to a
suitable location off - :ite. The developer shall be
financially responsible for an amount which is the
equivalent to the high end cost of demolition. However, if
after a good faith effort, a suitable site has not acquired
the Thomas House must be fully documented by a pro fessional
historic preservation consultant with photographs,
drawings, and further, research to create as complete a
record as possible.
2. Demolition permits shall not be issued for the Thomas House
until building permits for the project are ready to be
issued and a letter, guaranteeing that financing for the
project has been secured, has been received by the City
Planner.
The conditions, as approved by the Planning Commission, stated
that if the Thomas House were designated an hictoric landmark
by the City Council then the conditions would be applicable.
By direction of the City Council, the Historic Preservation
Commission has reevaluated its recommendation to the City
Council and has voted 4 -0 -3 not to recaamend a landmark
designation of the Thomas House because, lackingg owner consent,
the building did not meet all of the criteria in the new owner
consen* iolity. Further discussion of the landmark designation
has been submitted under separate cover, Thomas House Status '
Report, on this October 19, 1988 agenda. Therefore should the
Council determine hietnrlr e,.,�,,,..m. •- ..___::� -- ., _______. _
The third condition under the Historic Preservation heading
stated:
3. An archeologic survey shall be conducted an the site by a
qualified archeologist. The survey and recommendations
shall be reviewed by the City Planner and all necessary
action as determined by the City Planner shall be completed
prior to the issuance of grading or building permits.
Phis condition, is an environmental issue identified in the
Initial Study and is subject to the California Environmental
Quality Act. in urder to grant a Negative Declaration Ino EIR
D-/ (re
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR88 -11 - HATTLOCK
October 19, 1988
Page 5
required) for the project, this condition was added as a
mitigation measure Therefore, the archeologtc survey issue
must be separate fr Q the Ristoric Preservation Commission
recommendation to City Council and acted on independently.
The applicant has stated that the San Bernardino County Museum
V, was not significantly specific in designating this site as
archeologically significant and that it is inappropriate to
R•: require an archeologtc survey for this site when it was not
a required for the Thomas Winery site directly east.
A survey was not required for the Thomas Winery site because
staff was unaware of the museum resource, and the potential
archeologtc significance of the site, until after approval of
- the winery protect.
?£ - Respectfully submitted,
o� Brad Buller
City Planner
F
BB:CW:alg
Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Letter of Appeal
Exniblt '8' - Planning Commission Staff Report and Exhibits
of August 24, 1988
Exhibit 'C' - Planning Commtssion minutes of August 24,
1988
Exhibit 'D' - Resolution of Approval with Conditions,
August 24, 1988
Exhibit 'E' - Excerpt from Foothill Specific Plan
Exhibit 'F' - Excerpt from Foothill Specific Plan
Exhibit 'G' - Excerpt from Foothill Specific Plan
ayC"pt: >C.;- ,- �Sie*,° 4'F.rn��''h."j'` _ �<K: •j. - ' • " � e..:�Ci �., +Fw•.. "'i {': *t.,
t GYG PZL.. CCAA. - "X1rtL
CP 8-a7•s6
k, - 44
,!yo- August 26, 1980
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
.? Baseline Road •�..�
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 vA7,lr�°
RES Protect _lccoted at'Vineyard & San Bernardino Road
Small Office Buiidinq
:k+ ATTNt CITY COUNCIL NENBMW
-.� Please be advised that 1, the undersigned, who to the
owner of said project would liken to appeal the decisions of
the planning commission of-Auguat 24, 1908. The specific items
;t of concern are as follcwsv
., •• material used for the roofing
Ly.+ ••
*lattice patio cover, on the south sido•of
the prtop�yerty.�a�t
. • I am also very 8conceiiied'with all three items under the
sj "Historic Preservation Committee' report. I disagree and am
not in favor of all three items. It is my understandinq that
all three of these items will be heard at the city council
• the first meeting in September
a I would request that the other two Stems also be hoard
at the same Limo. 1 would sincerely appreciate hearing these
r items at the same time, because it has already been over one
year mince -h ve begun the process.
Sincer61 y e, T
Edward R. Combs, Owner
153 11. Central Avenue
Upland, California 91786
(714)- 981 -0466
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 24, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co®Ission
FROM Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOF!IENT REVIEW 88 -11 -
e eve opaen. o a square
00 -s ry o ce uilding on .40 acres of land on the
southwest corner of vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino
Road in a Community Commercial District within the
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Activity Center - APN:
207 - 102 -09.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and elevations and the
issuance o a mitigated Negative Declaration.
S. Su- UF--in Land use and Zonin
rlb�ii - -S ng a am y es aniial; Medium Residential (8 -14
dwelling units per acre)
South - Singie Family Residential; Community Commercial
East - Thomas Brothers Winery; Specialty Commercial
West - Apartments; Community Cemercial
C. Genestgnatims:
Pro ec ral Plan
Site De�ommercial
North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
South - Commercial
East - Commercial
West - Commercial
D. Site Characteristics' The site is loca^.ed w'Lhro a Footh.11
ou evar t v y Tenter, ;t I-. an under Ared ' egal non-
conforming lot and there is an existing building which has been
considered for historic la'rdtark status by the 8istoric
Preservation Commission. lhat recommendation has been
forwarded to the City Council dnu vitl be heard on September 7,
1988. The Thomas Brothers Winery protect is across the street
to the east and as part of that protect Vineyard Avenue will h.+
realigned. lhere is an existing apartment house on the
property directly west and the property south is largely vacant
with a single family home.
O I l ITM L
'f.
"
PLANNING COlMISSIO�' - TAFF' _. REPORT
DR 88 -11 '- Matlock .d Associates
August 24, 1988
Page 2
E. Parking Calculations:
Type
Square
Parking
of Use
Footage
Ratio
Office
6,385
1/250
II. ANALYSIS:
t
li
Number of Number of
Spaces Spaces ,
Rewired Provided
25 25
A. General: The proposed use is permitted within the Community
ZEFR ercfal District. A conceptual circulation master plan was
developed in conjunction with this project but is not part of
this Approval. Technical issues have been resolved through the
Technical Review Committee and the project has received
recommendations from the Design Review Committee. The site
plan and architecture are in compliance with the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan design guidelines.
B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Blakesley,
Caiernan reviewea tne review project on July 21, 1988 and made the
following comments and recommendations to the Planning
Crmnission:
1) Although a future reciprocal access easement will be
required of the project, a landscape border along the
western property line will be allowed with this project
and removed at the time of future connection.
2) The recessed window treatment is satisfactory
articulation.
3) Concept 'B' was approved for the west facade which shows
articulated windows which are consistent with the overall
building style.
4) The column at the southwest corner, of the building should
be a minimum 24' square.
5) The block wall proposed for the project should be
plastered and have a brick or similar type of cap which is
consistent with the building.
6) The tower arch should be opened for interest. The
Committee agreed to the applicant's suggestion of
providing a clock in the tower element instead.
Dam
PW:HING CO!lIISSIOV -TAFF 3EPORT
OR 88 -11 - Matlock d Associates
August 24, 1988
Page 3
'f•
N
�r
7) A greater mix of everg"een, deciduous, and accent trees
should be provided then what shows in the conceptual
landscape plan and a greater emphasis should be given to
" the northeast corner.
8) Within activity centers trees should De planted in a
regimental style at a minimum of 30' box size in order to
achieve sufficient height in accordance with the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan guidelines.
9) The second floor on the south elevation should be
f' redesigned to eliminate its bulky "add -on' appearance.
x
The Design Review Committee (Fnerick, Buller) reviewed the
modifications made to the architecture on August 14, 1988 and
made the following recommendations:
1) The Committee accepted Scheme "B' which is reflected in
Exhibit 'C' as satisfying the recommendation to change the
west elevation window treatment for consistency with the
overall building style.
2) The applicant was requested to restudy the south elevation
to eliminate its bulky appearance. The Committee accepted
the scheme sham in Exhibit "C" and also recommended that
an arch treatment be given to the doorway leading to the
stairwell.
3) An arbor /trellis should be provided at the pedestrian area
south of the building.
4) A continuous paving treatment should be used at the
pedestrian area, the office entries, and for a connection
between the two.
C Historic Preservation Commission: The project site has an
ex s ng s ng a am y res once and detached garage. The
structure dates back to 1926 and was built and used by members
of the Thomas family, Thomas Brothers Ninety, and by some of
the workers at the winery. Although the structures themselves
are modest the Historic Preservation Commission has recommended
that the Thomas house be designate] as a landmark because of
the original ownership. The City Council was originally
scheduled to consider landmark designation on August 17, 1988
but the item was continued to September 7, 1988 at the
applicant's request.
dal
4w'
PUWNING COMMISSIOP ''AFF REPORT
4 OR 88 -11 - Matlock ...J Associates
August 24, 1988
Page 4
r
The Historic Preservation Commission recommends the following
conditions be imposed by the Planning Commission:
1) That the house, and if possible, the garage, be moved to a
suitable location off of the property, such move to be
partially funded by the developer (at least the equivalent
of the high end cost of demolition).
2) If after good faith effort there is no place which to move
the structure(s), that a permit for demolition cannot be
issued until building permits for the project are ready to
be issued and a letter is received by the City Planner
guaranteeing that financing for the project has been
secured. The Thomas house must be fully documented with
photographs, drawings, and further research by a
professional Historic Preservation consultant to create as
complete a record as possible of the building.
3) Because of the project's Proximity to the Red Hill area,
an archeologlc survey should be conducted prior to grading
or building permit issuance.
The intention for the letter which guarantees financing for the
Project is in an effort to protect the house on -site until the
project
other project an Foothillm Boulevard rregardingbthe made usman
house and the demolition of thrt structure prior to the project
actually moving forward.
0. Environmental Assessment: The project is located within the
City es gna e e Fault Zone. A geologic report has
been prepared and is In the process of being reviewed by an
independent geologic consultant to determine affects of the
inferred Red Hill Fault to the proposed project.
A survey of the existing trees has been conducted by staff.
All but six of the trees are fruit or nut bearing and are
therefore exempt from the tree preservation ordinance. Three
of the trees are dead and one could be classified as "sucker
growth'. The two remaining trees are a Crape Myrtle and a
Pine. The pine tree will have to be removed for street
Improvements and does not have the aesthetic quality worth
preserving. The Crape Myrtle will have to be removed but could
be replaced in kind with a 36" box specimen.
Through proposed conditions of approval potential significant
impacts have been mitigated to the point of insignificance.
PLANNING COi MIOV TAFF REPORT
DR 88 -11 - Matlock .J Associates
August 24, 1988
Page 5
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the
General Plan and Xhe Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The
building design and site plan, together with the recommended
conditions of approval, are to compliance with the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan and all other applicable City Standards.
IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends that the Planning Commission
app YeT— opment Review 88 -11 through adoption of the attached
Resolution of approval with conditions and issue a Negative
Declaration.
/Qu"Y g
t ner
BB:CN:vc
Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - Location Map
Exhibit 'B" - Site Plan
Exhibit 'C" - Elevations
Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Tree Location Map
Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions
Da-3
1
3
M1'
r
=V
to
15
o
- is
t I
+� Z
J
aa� _�
r
WA
I.
a
A'W, .
it
sw
*Apo
ry
MZMIW .-
na
NII III Iii�1I111f i�ellll�vUR!l
rirrrrrrrnrrmrrn �rrr�rrrrirrmrrr '
ar
tro � TKaN v� !X►' "�Nq
W" ND. b'i•C!
a
� •tS
a C9J� 1�1
� •N
r-4" 4- •.
• P•nt n� _ c+ � _' H � t
1 • y' �1 A
a Iwloc.�+ IV
�� : M Li •L• *� II
t J j
�9 \lH
1260 t.
1'AOI I _LC_
r >n
oL Y
1�
�4 fl
0
_1
{
v � I
1
Motion: Movea by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesley, unareeausly carried to
continue Environmental Assessment and Development Review 88 -10 to the regular
Planning Commission Meeting of October 26, 1988.
• * + s r
12:00 A.M. - Planning Commission Recessed
12:15 A.N. - Planning Commission Reconvened
Chairman McNiel asked for a motion to continue the meeting beyond midnight.
Motion: Moved by Blakesley, seconded by Chitlea, i.aanimously carried to
continue the meeting beyond midnight.
f � r
NEW BUSINESS
L. ENVIROM
PQJ IAI - Ine uev
SuiTd ni do .a0 acres
and San Bernardino R�
Foothill Boulevard Spe
on the southwest corner of Viney,rn AV
Community Commercial District wit—in
n - APN: 201- 102 -09.
Chris Westman, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel stated that during Design Review he remembered voicing
resistance regarding the metal roof.
Commissioner Chitiea asked if the stucco finish was discussed during Design
Review. She asked if the applicant was planning to use the finish like the
sample on the wall.
Chairman McNiel did not recall discussing the finish.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Ed Combs, owner spoke. He thanked Chris Westman for his patience in working
with him. He stated they had worked on the project for 20 months when
suddenly Arlene Banks called him to advise that everything had to be pulled
because it may be an historical site, and that issue would be determined at
the next City Council meeting. He questioned what would be required regarding
the guarantee of financing required under the Historic Preservation portion of
the Resolution. He stated he took exception to the archeological survey
reouired by the Resolution and wondered why it was not required on the Thomas
Winery site across the street. He further stated that in order to get the
geological report, according to Richard Mills it might be necessary to remove
the house. He also stated that he talked to Rudy, Project Manager from the
lhrmas Winery project, and Rudy stated his contractors felt the house could
Planning Commission Minutes -22- %D August 24, 1998
I
i
not be roved because it is on a rack foundation. He felt the only
significance to the house is that it was owned by the Thomas family. There is
nothing architecturally significant to the house. He also questioned who was
going to pay for the documentation and pictures of the house.
Tom Matlock, 502 Nest Holt, project architect, objected to the arbor trellis
which was added at the Design Review meeting in August without the architects
being present. He wanted to have the trellis removed. He also objected to
Engineering requirements for in -lieu fees, items 1, 2, and 4. Because Rudy
from the Thomas Winery project stated they would be doing those things, ha
felt the conditions should be modified to show that only if the Thomas Winery
project was not completed, they would be required to comply. He stated the
finish samples were the finishes they proposed to use.
Mr. Combs stated the metal roof they were planning to use was not a flat,
sheet metal roof, but rather a grooved, baked on enamel.
There being no further cements, the public hearing was closed.
Chairman MCNiel stated the issues were the conditions in engineering and
historical significance of the structure, which is a Council decision.
Commissioner Chitiea pointed out the Commission had never before seen some o•
the conditions under the historical aspect. She felt the Planning Commission
and the Historic Preservation Commission should sit down together to discuss
direction. She felt staff should be directed to set up such a meeting. She
also felt it was interesting that an archeological survey was not required on
the winery site across the street.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that during the review of a project on the
south side of Foothill staff ran across a resource that the state offers which
shows state- recognized potential archeological sites. This project appeared
to possibly be within the area the state recognized. Because the Thomas
Winery project had already been approved and processed, this project was the
first to be impacted.
Commissioner Chitiea objected to the metal roof and also stated she did not
like the finish.
Chairman McHiel stated he felt the small stucco sample did not show what a
larger field of the finish would look like. He felt it would look somewhat
like a mission.
Commissioner Chitiea stated she would like to see an cctual application
because she felt it would look spotty.
Chairman McNiel stated the pocks would be of varying size. He felt the finish
was appropriate for the building.
Commissioner Chitiea stated she would like to look at a larger field of the
finish and perhaps photographs. She felt the trellis arbor was appropriate.
Planning Commission Ainutes -23- August 24, 1988
a31
Mr. Buller stated the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan lists specific actin`s
which should be to activity centers, such as vine arbors, covered walkways,
entry roof overhangs, multi- lighted windows, porches, etc.
Commissioner Chitiea stated she supported the arbor and wanted a the roof.
She also felt the Council needed to give direction in the historic
preservation area. She questioned the difference between architectural
significance and site significance. She felt no need to preserve buildings
which were only site - significant, only architecturally - significant structures
shou% be preserved. She felt it would be sufficient to mark significant
sites by a nice plaque. She understood the aspect of getting financing
because another old building was torn down prematurely.
Mr. Buller stated a letter from a reputable financial agency stating they were
committed to finance the protect would satisfy the Resolution provision for
guaranteeing the financing. He also stated that if the Council did not
support the recommandation for landmark designation, the Historic Preservation
conditions of the Resolution were still important if the Planning Commission
concurred with the Historic Preservation Comission. He stated that staff
mould be willing to do some of the documentation if they were permitted to go
cn site. He next addressed the archeological survey and stated that was a
land -use planning matter and not specifically an Historic Preservation
matter. Therefore, the Commission needed to make their decision on that
basis.
Commissioner Blakesley stated he felt it would be appropriate to have
something more specific about why the site was selected before burdening a
project with the archeological requirement.
Commissioner Tolstey stated he was not happy with the material used for the
roof, especially because of the Thomas Vineyard project across the street. He
felt it very important that the Historic Preservation Commission and the
Planning Commission should meet to discuss recommendations. He felt the City
staff should provide that documentation. He also felt that as Cucamonga Creek
had flowed over the area, any archeological items would no longer be in that
area.
Chairman Mckiel felt that what the Historic Preservation Commission was asking
for may be invalid on this particular property, but he felt the Planning
Commission needed a report from the Historic Preservation Commission that
identified what the Commission had discovered and told why it should be
designated as a site, and if an archeological study is requested, they should
state what t1my are looking for.
Hr. Buller stated the Historic Preservation Commission believed there were
valuable artifacts to be found. Not far from there the Indians had a pottery
mill and they felt perhaps there could be some valuable artifacts.
Commissioner Tolstay stated he felt at this point the Planning Commission was
at a loss as to what to do without further input from the Historic
Preservation Comission.
Planning Coamission Minutes -24- 24, 1988
Commis3ioner Blakesley asked if Mr. Buller had any idea what the archeological
survey would entail and cost.
Mr. Buller indicated he did not.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked 1: the discussions at the Historic Preservation
Commission meeting dealt with the virtues of the site or the building.
L;
Mr. Buller responded that the predominant discussion had to do with Gle owners
of the building, not the building Itself. He asked if the Commission felt
uncomfortable acting on the Resolution without knowing whether the City
Council was going to designate the building as an historical landmark. If so,
they may wish to continue the item until after the City Council meeting.
Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing to hear from Mr. Combs.
Mr. Combs reiterated he had been working on the project for the last 20
months, and the historic designation had only cow down during the last 45 to
60 days. He also stated this had never happened before in the City and stated
he felt it was unfair to suddenly ask for an archeological survey and Historic
Preservation requirements.
Chairman McNiel stated he felt as a matter of policy there was nothing wrong
with the conditions set forth for Historic Preservation; however, he felt it
not appropriate for this particular property. He questioned if the Resolution
could be processed with a recommendation to Historic Preservation.
Commissioner Chltiea stated that she felt it was not appropriate for the
Planning Commission to be acting on the matter without full information.
Mr. Buller asked if the Commission wanted to put in a provision that these
three conditions would apply only if the City Co -inch designated the property
as an historic landmark.
Chairman Mc Niel suggested that it be added that in the eyes of the Planning
Commission this particular site was not suitable for historic preservation.
Commissioner Blakesley stated he also felt it was reasonable to ask for some
evidence that this might be an archeological site.
Chairman McNiel recommended that the conditions stay in the staff report.
+ Commissioner Emerick felt Or first two conditions should be removed because
,s just by looking at the building, it could be concluded there was no
+ architect], al merit and therefore the conditions were not necessary. The
Planning Commission did not have enough evidence to decide about condition 3.
;•3
Commissioner Tolstoy stated the next ties the Planning Commission gets a
recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commissiao, more substantial
facts would be needed.
as
c4*
Planning Commission Minutes -25- August 24, 1988
Mr. Buller stated staff would forward this concern and work with the Historic
Preservation Commission on the matter.
Ummissioner Chitiea suggested the matter be continued until after the City
Council meeting the first week of September.
Ralph Hanson, 7eputy City Attorney stated they could go ehead and approve the
project with the option that if the property was designated an historical
landmark, then the three items would apply. He suggested ttay not delete the
items. Me stated another option would be to continue the mutter.
Chairman HcNiel stated the applicant objected to in -lieu fees for future
undergroundir,9, upgrading and modification to traffic signal, and coordination
with Thomas Winery for street improvements. He stated it was consistent with
policy that wherever possible the Commission attempts to get undergrounding.
Barrye Hanson stated condition 1 called for a standard in -lieu undergrounding
fee and would have Mr. Combs paying half of what the Thomas Winery was
doing. He stated it was understood that if Thomas Winery performed all the
work, then it was not necessary for this applicant to do so. Condition 4
stated they should work with the Thomas Winery people, so that the
intersection would not be torn up twice.
Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing.
Mr. Matlock, project architect, stated the roofing material was an important
part of the design element, and it would be inappropriate and difficult to
change to tile. He also felt this particular metal roof looked better than
many tile roofs.
There being no further comment, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Chitiea felt the elevations should be changed to reflect a change
in roof material. She felt engineering conditions should remain and she felt
the City Council should decide on the Historic Preservation question before
the Planning Commission decided. She felt City Council needed to set policy
direction and wanted to continue the matter until after the Council met,
Commissioner Tolstoy stated the minutes should reflect that the Planning
Commission was at a loss as to how to act on the matter with the kind of
information they received.
Nation: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy to adopt the Environmental
Assessment and Development Review 88 -11 with changes in the roof material to
be approved by Design Review and dropping out of Historic Preservation
language if City Council saw fit to drop it. Motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EHERICY., "WIEL, 'OLSTOY
NOES COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE I - carried
Planning Commission Minutes -26- ��(� August 24, 1988
? Mr. Buller asked for clarification regarding the applicant's request to delete
the arbor trellis.
The Coomission indicated that the arbor trellis is to remain.
Public hearing was opened to allow Mr. Combs to state he felt no one would be
walking there and it would only invite vagrants.
Commissioner Tolstoy pointed out the trellis area would be on the side and
would be used. He stated he could not see the applicant's objection.
x f f f f f
M. MODIFICATION OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -59 -
Agreement be provided for the future construction of a median island on
4th Street Oor a previously approved project, located At the northwest
corner of 4th Street and Center Avenue - APN: 210 - 381 -9, 10, 11 and 210-
391-16, 17, 18.
Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the staff report.
Public hearing was opened. As there was no public comment, public hearing was
closed.
Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesley to adopt Modification of
Condition of Approval for Development Review 87 -59. Motion carried by the
fallowing vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, NCHIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
N. ROCK CRUSHER DISCLOSURE POLICY
Brad Buller, City Planner presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chitiea presented a disclosure currently being used by Victoria
t-hich included language on the rock crusher.
Comoissioner Emerick asked that an illustrative list of potential types of
impmcts be included in the disclosure.
Mr. LWller stated there were three items in the staff report, which could be
included.
Planning Commission Minutes -27- ��� August 24, 1988
,r
RESOLUTION No. 88 -168
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO MAMMA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 88 -11, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD IN
THE COMRINITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - AM 201 - 102 -09
A. Recitals.
Devele (1) Ed Combs has filed an application for the approval of
pment Review No. 88 -11 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is
referred to as the application -.
(it) On the 24th of August, 1988, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded
said meeting on that date.
(III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
S. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, it Is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Comm ssfcn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
I This alSi hereby i lttte facts forth in t eRe Recitals, Ao sResoluion are ruand correct
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced meeting on August 24, 1988, including written and
oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: The southwest corner )of VineyardpandcSanoBernardteo Road; aro1pderty located at the
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is single
family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of a
single residential structure, the property to the east is being developed as a
specialty commercial center, and the property to the west 1s multi -famly
residential; and -
(c) The design 1s in substantial conformance with the design
guidelines of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comissior.
during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with
the objectives of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed use is in accord with the
objective of the Development Code and the
ppurposes of the district in which the site is
located; and a�/
PLANNING COM1ISSV- R:SOL11TION NO. 88 -158
OR 88 -11 - Natloc znd Associates
August 24, 1988
Page 2
(c) That the proposed use is in compliance with
each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially Injurious to properties
1„ or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negati,,e
Declaration.
S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planning
1) At the time of future connection to the west, that portion of
landscaping necessary for vehicular connection shall be
removed. Trees shall not be planted in that designated area in
the interim.
2) The column at the southwest corner of the building shall be a
minimum of 24• square.
3) The block wall for the proposed project shall be plastered to
match the building and have a cap consistent with the overall
project building materials.
4) A clock shall be included as part of the tower design.
5) An articulated arch shall be provided to the doorway for the
stairway on the south elevation.
6) A trellis /arbor shall be constructed at the plaza area.
7) A consistent paving treatment such as exposed aggregate or
interlocking pavers shall be used at the plaza, office entries
and parking lot connection.
8) A greater mix of evergreen, deciduous, and accent trees shall be
provided in the final landscape plan with general emphasis on
the northeast corner.
9) A 364 box Crape Myrtle shall be provided on -site as a
replacement for the Crape Myrtle being removed. The a plicant
shall file a Tree Removal Permit application to remove tRe Crape
Myrtle end Pine trees.
2-37
PLANNING COMNISS / "•' RESOLUTION NO. 88 -168
OR 88 -11 - Malec and Associates
August 24, 1988
Page 3
10) All landscaping shall be done to accordance with the foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan.
11) Approval of Development Review 88 -11 shall not be considered
final until the geologic report has been reviewed and approved
by the City. Any adverse impacts found by the geologic study
shall be mitigated to the degree of insignificance by
conditions. These conditions shall become part of the
Conditions of Approval of Development Review 88 -11
12) The roof material shall not be metal. The applicant shall
return to Design Review Committee for review of the revised roof
material.
Historic Preservation
In the event the Thomas House is designated an historic landmark, the
following conditions shall apply:
1) The house and if possible the garage shall be moved to a
suitable location otf -site. The developer shall be financially
responsible for an amount which is the equivalent to the high
end cost of demolition. However, if after a good faith effort,
a suitable site has not acquired the Thomas House must be fully
documented by a professional historic pre;ervatlon consultant
with photographs, drawings, and further research to create as
complete a record as possible.
2) Demolition permits shall not be issued for the Thomas House
until building permits for the project are ready to be issued
and a letter, guaranteeing that financing for the project has
been secured, has been received by the City Planner.
3) An archeologic survey shall be conducted on the site by a
qualified archeologist. The survey and recommendations shall be
reviewed by the City Planner and all necessary action as
determined by the City Planner shall be completed prior to the
issuance of grading or building permits.
Engineering
Special Conditions:
1) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of
the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and
electrical, except for the 66 K.Y. electrical) on the opposite
sides of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road shall be paid
to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee
shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length
as follows:
i •
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1988.
PLANNING MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO r1trAwnurA
I
PLANNING" COWSSKt.RE,966TIOi No. -88-168
DR 88-11 z-FAMOL: ""YW Associates
August 24, 1998
Page 4
to the City prior to the,13suance of building permits. The fee
shall be one-half the city adopted unit amount times the length
as follow:
a.,. Son Bernardino Road - frw the west project boundary to the
center of Vineyard Avenue.
b. Vineyard Avenue - from the south project boundary to the
center of San Dernardfno Road.
2) Upgrade, modification, and relocation, as necessary, - of the
traffic signal at the intersection of Vineyard and San
Bernardino Road. shall be the,responsibfilty of the developer.
3) An access easimint-fn favor of the property to the vast
over the
north/south drive aisle and portions of the southerly east/west
drive aisle shall be provided.
4) The developer shall coordinate with the developer of the Thomas
Winery project for the design and COA$tyvctloh of the
intersection improvements including upgrade, relocation or
modification of the traffic signals so that the intersection
will be completed as a single project as approved by the City
Engineer.
S. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1988.
PLANNING MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO r1trAwnurA
I
r.
4
° - °- PLANNING COMHISSt7!,RESDLUTION NO. 88 -168
DR 88 -11 = Nstloi and'Associates
-, August 24,'1988 -
Page 5`-
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cooaisston of the.aCity of
Rancho Cucamonga, do'hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution' was duly,and
f
regularly introduced„ passed, and adopted by the Dlanning CoawI
iss on hele
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a' regular meeting of the Planning Coastsston held
24th day August,.1988, -by the following vote- to -+r1t:
on the of
AYES: COMMISSIONER -a: MCNIEL, CNITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMMERICK, TOLSTOY -
p
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: NONE
dyc)
-, s.. J..
::1
2 f
} \\
. b
i $
!
35
.
s
sin | � .
� �
,
�
|
r
k�
.�
t
�
:
A5,
(k*
■§|
�
|
�
■
|
|
gild
%h
/k
§`
�
�k
�R
-IN
�
j
■
, / | lie
|�-
�
� � •,
| ! !
| i ES ! | _ .
� JQ|
i
, ■� !�
�
!
(k*
■§|
�
|
�
■
|
|
gild
%h
/k
§`
�
�k
�R
-IN
�
j
■
, / | lie
|�-
�
� � •,
| ! !
| i ES ! | _ .
� JQ|
i
{
{
{
■
k
� R
R! �
�s '
' :
: �
,VI%
f2
§ -
H
�A
§
�9
f�
G!
2lfgq
U
!
|
|
11-M-\
�\
Ij
#■ �
� R
R! �
�s '
' :
: �
�
� t
|,| |i
IL
r ■q � ! \
- %
Eq 2.
:
r #q
� �� # �$� t
�i � ;!
j
& "«
v;
If
■|
§ |
! w
|� �
a��
s3§ ira s -'• i�
a �E Uzi �p �s� r�
lyityi ?s i5 ai
�i'pp• � .A
jri _ r sa
3 1
ilii ' ! 3
8��3. - • -S7E
ar3e_ ;i
3cE��
gal
aSS'E Ea M11
lgl f a
i . - z a I -.
i
iTL
T ; s3
i nv s�E' 5s
Eia� 1331 as= ;i a. . �e
-4$= - E
: -s a ..�s f -<:. tig 3s =<m Ea��S 8o�i
)u3
sad
9aric�
?e�
a�M
;5
pp gppp��1g
a• -g
ga a Ei�iFsr!
,�3�� 3rac35a
Ea_ �. r
e — =� .E
E
�.3F a ,�r;3asa
rl
\
w
�
§
..
�- sf
�
|
�! ■
4 �
�
� q|
�• `!
&� � •
#�
E
pt
!
r/
!�
�
)
! r
§ /
1'! /
, §\ • �
ST
��.
1
.
:v
2T,
�! all
! t
/i-33 � | #5. §.f|t� / Q Hat
! !! & |
! �| ■ .r l,g t
g!�«
�� &���fa ■= ■� ��� �! � \ |�§
_�
! \ /k2/ ®ql §s�/
.. a,j�i� agile!
m
6
i
3s=
ka
i E a
a i
i =G
�a 1
ga�a
a;irai
caaj
d
32 :r
a
€:s aF
t� _3
.
3a fs
e sa
Ws' a3�
C
1
a
3
$d
Y "s
appp
aye,
5j
as
H
p
is
At 3' I i = kir F
tam a ` �i --
a d's
�9 �� � �Y�� •3
u is i a iii 3E a�ssn�
a fits
a 3 S 51,
a i:_,�
= =d3
saf 3� Is I s J.
.31 k
i�
t • a ►i 3a sot
is
Sias :3��jjgg pp a_
Dina <$3
\ I \;I 41
D45
He =air=
Alai
=p pp
15 "31
rig jHCH
;65i as��i
din a�a
a a sera
s:
ash �sSa
3k
i?e
y
yac� s� ESE t E a�E�� $ s tai s•
p}� s J jai si3a ; 'e ids gs
WI s :20- 5 = - =9 =y i a - g § l3
PH
13% rk
lit lN!3 f :s s z !?Ft p
=Js E =j to ^i ' E 7a ET
3?s =� �3t ?� �f s:l aj 31 SE -Sz S == 3 'f•
��9
d�a33d t f 3 'a� €? n3 F`e� 3! i r
a ] �i e AAR tg�
as ab%j as
e ,hl
As -3 sic F.
�- sl 3; ;
JI
HS
Es- • -a i�
�� V
s3
=I
sjs
!3
J
as ab%j as
e ,hl
As -3 sic F.
�- sl 3; ;
JI
HS
Es- • -a i�
�� V
$ � q
\ # _|
k � �
§
\ r
9 NI
! 21
li \,
#. �!
Z/ !
\| I�
/ ' ^| ' `k go
'f I j f | | ! � � /
N1 Ill
- , , | q! • a
e &� ! :!
§!h `n•. ■� ,�
2a Via. q £
\ Icl3 3 ! q ,2!7|
. �. ■a ! `e ■
�'• 5 @� § | |f \
�tq ■
|.
' ■�.�
; . M :i,� s .
L l �� l� 1j; | §q
\ q
PI -I is 1; @
%ja.g // a�q |» �q,!!N
/kƒ 2d t jKli A I
j j j,
4 / j 1;
9.r.4
Architectural isagery
y'r As prnilously mentioned, the Thomas
Brother Winery is the style determinant
" In this subarea. The main buildings at
s the Thosus Brothers Winery do not por-
t' tray •spacial" architectural features other
tiun a grape mbar and multiple shed
roofs. Investigations Into the archi-
tectural heritage of winery buildings
s sug.-asts that the structure Is repro-
sentathv of the California Barn Style
(see sketch). The simple, clean lines of
(t. the barn In profile provide an almost un-
limited range of architectural expressions.
The barn silhouette is universally recog-
nized as a symbol of the winery culture
3; and Is uniquely suited to serve as the
primary architectural prototype for this
F subarea.
?� Repeated use of building materials, color,
and basic architectural elements, can be
expanded so that proposed buildings can
be designed In harmony with the basic
contextual *feel" of the winery.
LardscspefStreetseape Imagery
i
•' The concept within the gctivity center
area is to Incorporate a formal, regularly
spaced stmt tree planting system
utilizing an Im"armally shaped, colorful
street tree palette. The trees are to be
planed 35 feet on center and are to
placed between two to five feet Inside
the property line (see Illustrations Section
8.3.2).
ran iar
�vr s,rN�ets
rs,,aro ren-
� � nuns
9.4.6
Design Palette:
ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER
DETERMINANT:
THOMAS BROTHERS WINERY
o Wait Materials:
Textured stucco, smooth stucco
Clapboard or board and batten aiding
Vertical wood siding
river Mck, fieldstone
o Roofs:
Cable, hip, and shed roofs
Pitch - 3:12 to 6:12
Wood shingle
Slate .. .
Metal (colored narthtones)
a Accents:
Vine arbors, covemd walkways
Roof overhangs over entries
Multi- Iightei windows
Porches
Exposed rafter taHs
o Scale:
One to two stories with towers,
pergolas, campaniles.
o Colors:'
White t3 off -white
Beige, sand, warm earth tones
Pastels with primary color accents
' These color ranges are only examples
and are only encouraged to be
utilized.
C
C
�j
�y
law
/boot-
101ra I w
Ml7. Ad
l
021
ant
Immust
M
Tawwy \~-O AI&A-f7 MAADO
"VAWVP
GENERAL MATERIALS
PALETTE
CENCRAL fPESICN CUIDEL
-rvT— AND DEV I FWrIMENT Suwo
DC/9 je"lpf I r F)
,� M
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVIEIOV I5D
NORTH
ITEM: VE 11
TITLE: i'ZA'?A 'LZ' Lh
EXHIBIT: -a- SCALE:
I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends
e e y Council designate the Hellman Avenue Eucalyptus
Windrow as a Point of Historic Interest. The Commission further
recommends that the General Plan retain a 'Special Street Design"
designation for Hellman Avenue.
II. BACKGROUND: This item came to the attention of the Commission
ecause o nquiries from the Engineering Division regarding future
street widening once an underground storm drain is in place and the
street is no longer a surface conduit for water. The Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan designates Hellman from Base Line to 19th as
a 'Special Design Street "; however, there is no guidance in the
plan as to the intent or configuration this designation is to
carry.
A 1980 City Council had voted to retain the curbs and trees on
Hellman Avenue. They also moved that their decision on retaining
the curbs and tree•, on one property should serve is a precedent for
the rest of Hellman. However, in February, 1988, the Historic
Preservation Commission expressed the opinion that the curbs did
not have historical significance.
iII. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CLMHISSION ACTION: The Commission voted 5 -1,
one member absent o recommend point of historic interest
designation. A reason cited was that the trees are aesthetically
pleasing. The Windrow also met several criteria in the Historic
Preservation Commission Ordinance. An earlier motion, which failed
3 -3, was for the Commission not to designate the trees as a point
of interest but to request retention of the Special Design Street
designation, and if the trees must be removed, that specimen -sized
replacements be used.
Several members of the public appeared at the hearing, six of whom
spoke on the issue, 3 against, 2 in favor, and one neutral.
a51
CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT all
DATE:
October 19, 1968
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE HELLMAN AVENUE EUCALYPTUS
VTRM
I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends
e e y Council designate the Hellman Avenue Eucalyptus
Windrow as a Point of Historic Interest. The Commission further
recommends that the General Plan retain a 'Special Street Design"
designation for Hellman Avenue.
II. BACKGROUND: This item came to the attention of the Commission
ecause o nquiries from the Engineering Division regarding future
street widening once an underground storm drain is in place and the
street is no longer a surface conduit for water. The Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan designates Hellman from Base Line to 19th as
a 'Special Design Street "; however, there is no guidance in the
plan as to the intent or configuration this designation is to
carry.
A 1980 City Council had voted to retain the curbs and trees on
Hellman Avenue. They also moved that their decision on retaining
the curbs and tree•, on one property should serve is a precedent for
the rest of Hellman. However, in February, 1988, the Historic
Preservation Commission expressed the opinion that the curbs did
not have historical significance.
iII. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CLMHISSION ACTION: The Commission voted 5 -1,
one member absent o recommend point of historic interest
designation. A reason cited was that the trees are aesthetically
pleasing. The Windrow also met several criteria in the Historic
Preservation Commission Ordinance. An earlier motion, which failed
3 -3, was for the Commission not to designate the trees as a point
of interest but to request retention of the Special Design Street
designation, and if the trees must be removed, that specimen -sized
replacements be used.
Several members of the public appeared at the hearing, six of whom
spoke on the issue, 3 against, 2 in favor, and one neutral.
a51
CITY COUNCIL STAFF
Proposal for Desig;
October 19, 1988
Page 2
)Res ully ltted,
d
City anne
BB:AB:vc
Attachments: Exhibit - "A' - September 1, 1988 Staff Report with Attachments
Exhibit 'B" - Letter from Frank D. Green
Exhibit 'C' - February 18, 1988 and May S. 1988 Memorandums
Exhibit 'D" - City Council Minutes, December 3, 1980
Exhibit 'E' - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes,
,y September 1, 1988
Exhibit 'F" - Point of Interest
Resolution
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 1, 1985
T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation
Commission
FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner
BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: HELLMAN AVENUE EUCALYPTUS TREES BETWEEN BASE LIRE ROAD AND
LA RONDA.
I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation
omm sEi s own rxamoend to the City Council that the Hellman Avenue
Trees be designated a point of historic interest.
II BACKGROUND _ CURRENT: The Hellman Avenue trees have came to our
a n on ecausa at inquiries from the Engineering Division about
the possibility of future street widening, and also in connection
with the General Plan update in which the status of the street is
being reevaluated. Underground storm drains will be installed in
the next year removing the function of the street as a flood
control channel.
In February, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission expressed
the opinion that the high curbs are not historical, as is the
curbing along Etivanda Avenue.
The trees on this street are not on the survey list.
III. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
A. Location: The trees under consideration are the Eucalyptus
9To6uTus (Blue Gum) that stand on the west side of Hellman
Avenue. The row starts approximately 250 feet north of Vase
Line Road at the northerly edge of the parking lot of the
church at the northw;:st corner of Base Line Road and Hellman
Avenue, and ends where La Grande forms a 'T" intersection at
Hellman Avenue, about 125 feet south of La Ronda.
North of the windrow a section of the street has been widened
to the standard width with a standard curb. A section to the
north of the widened area and south of 19th Street has a rural
look with abundant vegetation and a variety of trees, including
Eucalyptus.
D6 f
i
r.,
t'
HISTORIC PRE
HELLHAN AMEN
September 1,
Page 2
STAFF REPORT
B. Site Land Uses Zon1n and General Plan Des' nations: The
rees are n e r g -o -way a acen s n ea ar y lots,
in an ama zoned and designated on the General Plan for Loa
Density Residential use (2 -4 units per acre). Most of the
houses adjacent to the trees appear to have been built after
World War II.
C. Surrounding Land Uses. Zoning, and General Plan Designations:
Tf—e :rees are surrounded by s ng I a TMI iy nouses, and Low
Density Residential zoning and General Plan designations,
except at the southerly portion. where Hellman Avenue joins Base
Line Road. Hellman Avenue curves just south of where the row
of tr es begins; on this portion of Hellman Avenue is a church,
which faces Base Line Road, and its large parking lot, which
stretches along Hall ean Avenue. At the corner of Base Line
Road and Hellman Avenue on the east side of the street, the
land is designated, zoned and used for offices. Also on the
east side south of La !Mesa and just north of the offices are
soma multiple family residences.
D. Descrt tion: The 42 large and generally healthy trees form a
11 ne along the west side of Hellman Avenue and tower above
it. They add a sense of place to the street. They are only 6
feet from the high curbs that characterize Hellman Avenue,
which for many years has served as a storm water channel.
The narrowness and very high curbs make the street
substandard. The roadbed is too narrow and well- traveled by
motor vehicles for children to safely to walk on.
IV. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The General Plan refers to Hellman Avenue as a
inpthe Circulation sneF.lementn under the of heads g8'Sp General DesigPlan,
Streets" is the following:
"Hellman Avenue: The segment of Hellman Avenue between
Base Line Road and 19th Street has been designated for
special historic significance and should be studied to
establish street requirements consistent with its historic
character.'
On December 3, 1980, the City Council voted to retain the curbs
and trees on Hellman Avenue. At that time an approved tree
removal permit for 6730 Hellman Avenue was appealed to the
Council. The minutes read as follows:
D6q
'�'�'_ __ mac: °°_..,��;•:, sa;(
,.� HISTORIC PR;: aiTIOH C617ISSIOM STAFF REPORT
HELLMAN "EWA! EUCALYPTUS TREES
September 1, 1988
Pagtr 3
°Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to retain the curbs
and trees on Hellman Avenue and to sustain the appeal.
This is to be a precedent for the rest of Hellman
x' Avenue. Also to have a lien attached to this particular
piece of property In order to protect the futura interest
of the property and the City. Motion carried unanimously
When the General Plan was adopted in April, 1981, the special
designation for the street was included. However, as far as
r staff is able to determine, no designs were over executed and
in the meantime as traffic has Increased, the problem of
c retaining the high curbs has become more apparent.
Street Widening: The curbs have been determined not to have
historical significance; however, the significance of the trees
remains to be determined. If the Commission decides that the
trees have no special significance, they vould ordinarily be
removed when the street is widened from its current width of 24
feet to a standard curb to curb width of 44 feet. At this
time, the only trees being discussed are the Eucalyptus south
of La Ronda wliere La Grande T's into Hellman Avenue because
they were identified as a significant windrow on a map
accompanying a 1980 tree preservation report, they are fairly
healthy, and they help to keep the street's character that an
earlier Council wanted to retain.
As a way to improve the street while keeping some of the
character of the portion between Base Line Road and La Ronda,
staff has suggested a modified street section which is attached
to this report, along with a memo to the City Engineer which
explains the reasoning behind the proposed modification. The
concept is to retain the trees, lower the curbs to standard
height, eliminate the parking lane on the west side of the
street, widen the driving lanes from 12 feet to 14 feet, and
add a parking lane on the east side of the street. The parkway
on the west side remains the same, 21 feet; the parkway on the
east side would be 9 feet wide.
Historical Significance: According to Commission Member Eugene
Ill] I ngs, ie rees are younger than those in many of the
windrows which were planted in the last century, but certainly
they are well over SO years of They were planted alongside
orange groves; many of the yards of the lots along Hellman
Avenue still have orange trees growing in them that are reariant
of the groves. Howeve•, staff has not found any re.ords
telling exactly when and by whom the trees were planted.
D
b�vr HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONNISSION STAFF REPORT
HELLHAN AVENUE EUCALYPTUS TREES
P ppttember 1, 1988
It is important to note that these trees have been a familiar
feature of one of the oldest streets in Alta Loma for at least
50 ncyears and probably more, that the trees performed the
„ = fution of protecting the groves from the tremendous winds
that blow through this region as well as provided shade, and
offered a visual change from citrus groves, vineyards, and
brush.
C. Tree Preservation Report: According to a report on
reserva • on o uca yp us trees in Rancho Cucamonga, ( "Tree
Preservatlan: An Overview' City of Rancho Cucamonga, July,
1980) local farmers first planted Cypress for wind protection
after a disastrous windstorm in 1688. After a few years, they
Blue eGum, because they were tree, have 0long llife nspans,
and were inexpensive to plhnt. Disadvantages are that thgr are
messy, constantly dropping bark, leaves, branches, and se_+:t,
and they require deep watering and much maintenance to Keep
them attractive, free of disease, and less susceptible to !ire
and limb breakage. The report states that other kinds of
Eucalyptus are more appropriate for residential areas and that
Blue Gum have n•ten not survived when there are tdjacent
environmental charges such as new development or flew paving
that cuts off the water supply and covers their roots.
The report also emphasizes that the trees have become a
cultural and aesthetic resource, and that the majority of
problems comes from unmaintained trees. The report says, "One to analyze
hazards and nuisances value they create' trees (page rs8). The potential
concludes with a recaamendation to presntve selectively tho
healthiest trees and most aesthetically pleasing trees located
in appropriate places, and to replace others such that same
wind control is maintained. The goal is that streets in the
future will be attractively lined and shaded with the maturing
trees and that some windrows -dill be maintained.
The result of the report was a revised tree ordinance. The
current ordinance states the following in Section 19.00.010 A.
and C :
A: 'Such trees are wofthy of protection in order to
preserve the scenic, beauty, prevent soil erosion, provide
shade, wind protection, screening and counteract air
pollution
D�S
Page 5 ".
REPORT
C. 'In particular, the Eucalyptus windrows are a unique
inheritance w,tose cumulative value as a windbreak system
I
Y.
s a desirable resource. It is the 'Intent, of ,this chapter
to perpetuate 'a windbreak system .through protection of
selected Blue Gum Eucalyptus windrows and expansion of the
system. T
D. Environmental Assessment: Designation of lanUarks'and points
o n ores are exemp$ ,rom CEQA (Article' 19. Section 15308)• =
Y. FACTS FOR FINDIHGSi Staff has not fount fnfoiWfOn from A Histo
° oma, ram City files; or from personal lntery ews a
re—se rees ave "specific historical associations: However, the
following findings support designation of the windrow as a point of
historic interest..
e A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
i
• 1. The proposed point of historic interrst is particularly
;i representative of an historical period and way of life.
2. The proposed point of historic interest 1s connected with a
business and use which was once common but Is now rare.
B. Historic Architectural and Ennineerina S1 iffcance:
1. The overall effect Of the design of tit. proposed point of
interest is beautiful.
C. HelghDorhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed point of historic interest materially benefits
the historic character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed point of historic interest represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the cumaunity.
r
a5�
i
s
-TREES • � ` '
—' �,
- Se testier 1E]W1988KAI.YPTUS
.�
-0,e
` VI. CORRESPONDENCE: uT111g Ttes has been advertised in the,04ily Reoort
newspaper an ;ameri••along Hellman Avenue have-receTveea
xr_-
' °w=
pu c
hearing notices: 0
„u
Respectfully subaitted,,;
Ns
Larry Henderscn, AICP
Senior Planner
LH:AB:mlg
-
Attachments: V*w to City Engineer with Street Sections
Plan View of Hellman Avenue betreen Base Line Road and La
U
Ronda
Site Photographs
Point of Interest Application
Resolutions
�� v
N
w
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 17, 1988
10: Russ liaguire, City Engineer
FRON:O:"' Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: HELLNAN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Aaseollkn Road and neral lam designates *special the segment Of Hellman between
thet it should be studied to establish reet regiire entseco consistent
with its historic character.
We received a memo from Walt Stickney asking about the historical status
of Hillman Avenue and informing us that with the future construction of
story drains, the high curbs will no longer be needed and that Hellman
Avenue will eventually be widened to 44 feet curb -to -curb, with standard
curb height.
In curbsbdoanot h the ave Harty Preservation
historical significance; thetsignificance
of the Eucalyptus trees will bo discussed at the Commission's September
1 meeting. According to Jeff Barnes, the trees are in good condition
with the exception of a few in front of one property that was vacant for
a year or more. A previous City Council is on record as wanting to
Preseroe the trees. The trees we are talking about are located on the
west side of Hellman Avenue and ,lust above Base Line Road up to La Ronda
Street.
To comply with the "Special Design" designation, we are requesting
consideration of the attached street design concept. After receiving
your input we will present it to the Historic Preservation Commission
for their comments and recommendation.
As you can see from the attached concept plan, the parking lane would be
eliminated west side Of
curb ewhf dangerous
a sloped area
between the trees and the curb, a distance of about 6 feet. The
southbound lane would be 14 feet wide. The east side of the street
would have a 14 foot northbound lane, an 8 foot parking lane, and a
standard curb. The parkway on the east side would be 9 feet wide; on
the west side it rexains the same, 21 feet. This special street section
would transition back to standard requirement at La Ronda Street.
t
Mr
�1e {J•F ^O
Improvements
Please let us know your response is the next day or two so that we can
include your recomsendation in the staff' report to the Commission.
a
AB:mlg
cc: Malt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer
Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engii eer
fl•
ilfA
He11Mn
•"
Page 2
�1e {J•F ^O
Improvements
Please let us know your response is the next day or two so that we can
include your recomsendation in the staff' report to the Commission.
a
AB:mlg
cc: Malt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer
Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engii eer
fl•
NI
M
w
0
�xisnryU s�� spry
i
�
' 5; 15rgj" �
14-,
E
/Ai` *N �y�
E
APPROX. 126'
TOTAL OF .2 EUCALYPTUS
TREES EXIST IN THIS AREA
APPROX. 6' FROM FLOODWALA I
I
I
APPROX. 225•
BASELINE ROAD
CITY OF
R.-k..\CHD ci rA xi ykt-A
ST
ST.
ITY HALL
V�
NMH
urful
PLANNING - � EXHIBSTI
SCALE: - -_
{
i
ME A
HISTORIC,
COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY "
Address: Aellm'en
nan% y{
API:
} VleV Looking htarf*
Date of Photo
View LookingjAolh
Date of Photo ,
Page _, of _ Pages. LJH2
D,
im
r;
k
s
r:
e
ZION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY
=maw -• _
Address: // t
Lr_�YLk i1 rw i
APt:
H
View LookinqQej:MjLe5,
Date of Photo_ x
�N(G_
View Looking_
Date of Photo A' —fr
_Page of _ Pages.
LJH2
.a
RESOLUTION N0. 88 -11
f° A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION commisSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DESIGNATION OF THE BELIMAN AVENUE WINDROW LOCATED NORTH
OF BASE LINE, SOUTH OF LA RONDA AS A POINT OF HISTORIC
INTEREST
. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has hold a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of
= Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Comission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOV, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located in the City's
r i g:it- of -vay
SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest mv,ts the
following cr era established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho ucamonga
Municipal Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed point of historic interest is particularly
represencative of an historical period and way of life.
2. The proposed point of historic interest is connected
with a business and use which was once common but is now
rare.
J. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
1 The overall effect of the design of the proposed point of
interest is beautiful.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed point of interest materially benefits the
historic character of the neighoorhood
2 The proposed point of historic interest represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
community
cCTION III: ] esignation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt
from CEpAr 'icTe I➢, Section 15308),
ZETION IV -•ased on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Coission an sed on the findings set forth above,
CAI, THEREFC, °E IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservatiai Cbmoiss a hereby approve designation of Hellman Avenue
Windrow as a Point of n: Interest.
` APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS Ist DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1988.
BY: u�
o c m �ia roan
AYES: COK41SSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
d ( r>'
♦ .s 9
!I
.1.
August 30, 1988
Historic Preservatiun Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Dear Commissioners;
I wish to address my concerns regarding the proposal to desig-
nate the Hellman Avenue Windrow a landmark. I have several
reservatioae regarding this proposal that you should he aware
of before any decisions are reachel.
My name is Frank Green and I have lived at 7156 Hellman Avenue
for nearly 30 years. The concerns I wish to address are in several
areas.
1. I have lived with these trees year in and yearout and I have
perhaps c different perspective of them than you might have. I
see them as a dirty tree with continualshedding of bark, loaves,
branches and seed pods. T_ am cleaning my yard and the pecking of
their debris all the time. The City never has cleaned the messes
made by the trees. I am and have always been an admirer and lover
of trees, but these are difficult to even like.
2. Trues are adjacent to each side of my driveway entrance from
Hellman Avenue, and over the years they have caused heavy damage
to my driveway. Their roots and growth have raised the driveway
some 6 -7 inches, have broken the concrete driveway, the high curbs
and generally made a mesa of the driveway. For many years I have
asked, pleaded and cajoled with the County and City to do something
for me in this regard. People have listened, looked and tsk, tsked
and nothing has ever been done. Now that the City Commission looks
upon these eucalyptus trees as sanctified objects, help in the future
seems even lees likely. I believe I could almost tolerate these
[rasa if they had not and were not continuing to ruin my driveway,
3. Another area of great concern I have regarding Hellman Avenue
and the trees is the extreme traffic hazard they pose, especially
every time I leave and enter the driveway. I have to creep out
onto Hellman Avenue before I can see around the trees to see 1 -' any
cars are approaching. It is a danger to me and to the rapidly app-
roaching cars. Also, I wish you could drive down Hellman Avenue
and attempt to turn into my driveway without going into the oncoming
lane of traffic. Hellman Avenue, in this section, is really a
traffic hazard, made even worse by the trees.
4. A fourth area of concern is the danger the trees pose to my
property. Over the years , gave been here, these trees have blown
down. One crashed through my block wall fence and landed nearly
on the front porch. Incidentally, I had to assume all costa to
X
repair a large eectio"f my block wall.
no obli8etion, financially for liability.
responsible if this were to occur again in
designated a landmark?
4� I
The County /City assumed
I wonder who will be'
the future if these trees
have been
5. Finally, I believa that, ar. adequately widened Hellman Avenue
weahed down
would alleviate the many floodinge we have experienced v in the was
I never want co nee another_ t arrified motWouldn't
motorist i agwider street
Hellman in his car during afooing.
e this continuing problem?
alleviat
In summatinn, I would like to express moealaheI believers that TO
-
In the Hellman Avenue be properly and odequately widened to
eat widen
Hallman Avenue should be P P attars worse. Don t ) I believe
a dangerous traffic hazard that 'a ha eucalypeuss need to go,
one side, d. it once again. I am not against trees in
propertyl at great
they main should. Once a8
maintain, care for and waver a ocher tress on my P
expense to ma. Among thou are 25 of the original cltrna trees of the
grove the ttencompil cared efwesternw aide oftHe]Joao Avenue. we'll nd
that or a always have those even though the eucalyptus go@
something should be done by the City to
If my opinion and views are not of value in the decisions me e,
then at the vary least, driveway and also something done to active
correct the damage done to my the City should take a moreellman
prevent further damage- Aleo,
role in pruning cleaning and maintaining the trees along
Avenue regardless of what decisions are made.
Sincerel //y,�,.{q,,,,' —_
Frank D. Green
7156 Hellman Avenue
Alta Loma, California
s �„
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
vr. DATE: February 18, 1988
y TO: Barry R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
.y FROM: 1Lr li�Tdersrrn, Senior Planner
M1 r SUBJECT: HISTORICAL STATUS OF NELLKAN AYERUE (RESPONSE TO INQUIRY
DATED FEBRUARY 4, 1988)
In an answer to your question as to whether the west side of Hellman
Avenue south of 19th Street adjacent to Tentative Tract 13865, can be
ultimate
widening would beProhi b
bited curb width, inn this oregarenIstestablished
I'
by the following factors:
1. The subject tentative tract site adjacent to Hellwn Avenue
Y contains no significant vegetation whatsoever, including
r' Eucalyptus trees. In fact, the only significant row of
3 Eucalyptus trees that could be found upon observation in
the field, were a row of trees extending from Base Line
' Rosd to LeOrande Avenue on the wast side of Hellmmn Avenue.
2 considered by theuHistoricoPreservat onrCommissionlat8their
meeting of January 7, 1988. HPC members expressed the
e the in bhon nitoriHllman Ave uecouldnot ecsidereo es historical, as
was the curbing adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue in the Etlwanda
area, because the curbing was constructed as a portion of a
flood way system.
3 alongsHeliman Avenueevident
b tweenthat Base Linea ndel9th Streetuhave i
been widened to the standard width with standard curb .nd
gutter c.nstruction. Therefore the assumption must be tale
langerfln effeet then a sqtaedmared street widthhw a areaeo
curb /gutter section is preferable from a traffic safety
standpoint.
I hone this answers the questions you had concerning Hellman Avenue, if
you need further information or have any questions please feel free to
contact me.
LH:vc
cc: Brad Buller
Barbara K.atl
' )Ila �v
!•�:71J
Meares Macad by Mete. stondad by pelesbo to stpar, 4seluttas Mo. N•l11 '
lad to vats all,, a""$. Mott" "rrtee reeirasy 5-0. Utz Olash
Woatre a" e43s et tasoloetee 10. 60.111.
P{
t SfSOLMOS t0. 60 -111
A UJCUrlOM Cy TR CITY MM C, SIC CRT
07 "100 COC"Y A. CALMMLA. Mullet jU
TCO�CC «60171 AM=T70M M= 1
733. 1677. Ay 9667.
�� � setae y 61a/A FIM,. 'art 1�7 '�tOtO— Ip� Ott =• 7[tt[ sport rrF (l77
Yt
The city s W rocalved ee appeal for r apy[aVed Tras M..m l revolt n 'sore
that 4— 1"an Astr sea testa IOCAtoo at 6730 9a11"a Araar. I1r. *A,. ,ald
f;. talnd y the Ctry: FI epps4141ee to the rural of ma taw hoA be" u-
3t.
want Schlosser
spread of ruiy for ►Wlte hearty.
Y Dee Or"a, aposuas for his tather-ta -3r ty land at 6731 Souses An• •'-. eN4
a flea' of bulto th, RN seeuttl request dept",
Sob lespadelo 6940 411rt trust, spok, is Ater of n the k ht&% curbs stages she atratt ar a sea' "try"& etwt durrttt the 'nee Aod the
i^ Atq awst.
iY
There bolt' r furth'T teem' tests me audtsage,l PAY" Schlosser closed the
ipp pent" of the erlMy.
y. Covanlsss 9CS466 aaprasaA tbat it "Ould be e Crisis a choose WISAM Arrow
1 uou, 0e said that thA'InituLr Variety of sucal"M Kee lo Clem ACA the
•!T�tAs-t ,r
MCI"I hoM by Snd6a alto"" y yalst4o to realp the curt, A" true as
Gllaas Aqua A" is sus,4o the appeal.
l tl le to to a Precedent
l asUCUlae a al Osllsa A1"ee. TPrecedent Alts, to hen a Ike attack" to this
Yale[ aeadlua of propatq to eau to protect the future aarast of he
ry ma ctry. Matt" anl" Imaelsouly 3-0.
P HIM Schlosser C"W s Coca" At 10143 1-1. The Bratty se,,,,,ued at I1t00 p•e.
tam 411 ap►an ad tbs :mG Il A" stall 'faster.
4, rtty MAMAen• a, nears
4A. A"UL Or pnrStO' SZCMTM M iLD ltit NTft tIM trn1,
f1.
Mayor Scblwa' ask" FCo. Mefstt to car f'Mrd. PA asked
slAct1A4m to suaasi so the calf rs hot r! she has any
Coorol i ;ft GM the state. C,tt "'tee. Th" I- Oudatbe %%IIJM tocadp939 the iluhvteb at
Coupcil. the taitouly •actioneV" 2"Cate socas. After seas Aaawty by the
Motlanl Mora by p,tctN. Snood" by Mihols a 'lieu the Mot!"" at9bae,
epptho (June 119!) a e4on1:4 the cad Kill Coffee Shop at". Ma[1N passed by
e a fcllsuaS "tat 47931 Mtkela 141oabs, Irtd9,, a" Smlaasar. MO[f1 feat
"Sent Nona. (rote said he pp o;44 this belts. ho Alt w shntA costly utth
our cup Otdlanta and asks this stag meths.
C.
:1 �_ Q'VuYri -7z) dt
4
. �:1 i� ..,Kl t•�.x 1,i `.y. M `;1� ='.` ` ��. 1.. .y iN'= _ _ .. �.,'�a •'y �: _�.
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r
MEMOR.AMUM
GATE: Ray 'S. 1988 a
TO: Alan Warren, Associate Planner wn
FROM: Walt Stickrey, Associate Civil,Engineer
i
SUBJECT: General Plan Update — Historical Status of Hellman Avenue
(19th Street to Base Line Road) _
With ^he future construction of a storm drain in Hellman Avenue within
the limits from Base Line Road to 19th Street, it will no longer --be
necessary to maintain the high curbing which now exists for, the flood
way. After the installation of that storm drain, Hellman Avenue should
eventually be widened to a 44' curb to curb width (collector status) with
standard curb height.
The Eucalyptus trees on the west side of Hellman Avenue may still be of a
historic nature and if so, any future widening of Hellman Avenue would
have to account for them.
Please update the General Plan to reflect the Hellman Avenue widening and
curb height change (and, if warranted, eliminate the `Special Pesiga
Street" designation).
Attached is Larry Henderson's memo to Barrye Hanson regarding the
widening, curb height and vegetation on Hellman Avenue.
WS:sd
Attachment
i
r
P:
!1
t
J
F-- -
i
1 NELLMAN FIVE.
SCALE:
1 ^ HELLMR/I FVE £F:'/ •.,
7. 40fDtr utaJw.r.
C- orclla m, maim reqea.ted star Its •1• b* rowed aloe. tyre w m b kq eat* "ai
rub"tted to the army. Issue w tle nitw at 9crfemeeae Seed Let #pope PLaac(y _
for tract 9710. -
a. Appmrai at Wmmn . 1*3"rer so. 9042 -7 f6r.1200.376.24.
b. AlC Aoly fetenp ureeas far Dnaty 1. 41au*m. no Cob. MU frothill (l
I -14"Alt — .+ala bear coed .1me.
e. Atcoytla Mneals LLemea for Sin feel!" ALcliesao Ise. for gaf Cn sb.rSe (:
rte.. Wldoe Codbory. Wort Jensen, Jeeyh I*ragltae., reould Wycoa
Mrtkl*, Ae latltle Anna#. 9213 AeehlbsW Armue — m Ate lateral.
d. rorrard Chia ha fod y J. f.atheaek " ty City Attoeap for N—AlLOr. (l
s. roraced Clan fro ■alt! Ail. Ykar to eta City "teeny for haedfadg• (A
f. "tynutim for the Deputy city Clark m ett." ty 1931 City Clan,
laai.ce. Jmay 14-16 I. Seceowto, Ketimeed coon 3200.00.
t. Ylabars.oen[ Atratyot Sat [aleeatieg on t"uatrfal A..ousaet District. (3
Amrarat of aicasseot to allow niabureaemc Of SIS,C00 to "easaeent tatleterto3 ova
late! Couee.t for aoueaowe Dntrlee 7 }l. lye. Loco" M.0 poly be rely ursed so
the dLtrtct n appretea coed farad.
if
b. Caotlect "deadr to C.n*!!m 9troue PeaLlr..pat project, Approral of nits wo" (f
to carer the cost of ItmToral design o[ the eeqwim of • box culsort to"Ited to
cc"Imte ty Caral#ln Strout raalltea*oc.
L. OLoyard Arsaue 4*ito S*ret<eal Apprmtl of eaetr"t rlth C D Ltty*e"og to li..
cosDl*n "tbt ef. l a"alainea. railroad eeardiacim. Aed ya13n of the plap"d
earrlcu� protect. L@#e "d apyrorel y ansnet vlth the City et Ontario for e4dlat '!
.j
-'r
Den.!*. ]r. 1970 _ 5 ��: H. rI \.t6
,Aa: Crff
MY cwwm Kr
'Y(+.•
n'Y•7a�._;s 4nitr ricefn.° `(1'.'4e
.. ,:.tip
St
of eW Cte7 Camril eau told 1a the µea'. lark fm�vtp Gotae.,,rM1
,9131 Wei ism toed, Pock@ Oea.mmta. m Wdwyl. D.e met 7, 1980. Ih* what a'.i
w tall*d n ft"' At 7102 p.s. y Ktyor Shiny 0. Schtesear who 1N in ty Ilat Y"
i
.
@slut*. - ,
F:
h.eaaes tsalvaMS Joe D. N(Lai#, Slehaal A. pain@@, trtmr t. irWN. sod Myer
9kt1119 0. Srhleaa.r.
>
.Y`
Also Presents C( '.'r'..
y p4aAter. )arm M. Yw"eeep 4#Ltmc C!y enemy. robs"
it;
t•!
�rc/tl W y� icu m Sabiese.I Co®1tI D@rslap.sot Otn<nr. Jack
"@seamy
me7s Saul.. Dot"' UUU s�bll.y "d SoNep 7toAme Otractor. Sexy
Ab*AVc, C'V —Uam J. C. freer
Apprerai at ML .t It v -".at" that a tam. be
`•
coact'" m Pet* 7. S.ee1m
u. *lasb 9arett pb, Liao thr.. u rallwus Seater. hs colt that ese weWd ba rant@.
u w dU me require . 4•
type oaf thvwp `%X th. Coy dea n fin p"blw created ...
beucse of the via".. Unicar ".ad by laiae., aacaafnd 0� • n appra,. the
@..Wed
ee "eared
sltea at btee0tr S. 1990. , )poaim e@rrlad A 1-0. (comttlan Iron abnot7. ..
7. 40fDtr utaJw.r.
C- orclla m, maim reqea.ted star Its •1• b* rowed aloe. tyre w m b kq eat* "ai
rub"tted to the army. Issue w tle nitw at 9crfemeeae Seed Let #pope PLaac(y _
for tract 9710. -
a. Appmrai at Wmmn . 1*3"rer so. 9042 -7 f6r.1200.376.24.
b. AlC Aoly fetenp ureeas far Dnaty 1. 41au*m. no Cob. MU frothill (l
I -14"Alt — .+ala bear coed .1me.
e. Atcoytla Mneals LLemea for Sin feel!" ALcliesao Ise. for gaf Cn sb.rSe (:
rte.. Wldoe Codbory. Wort Jensen, Jeeyh I*ragltae., reould Wycoa
Mrtkl*, Ae latltle Anna#. 9213 AeehlbsW Armue — m Ate lateral.
d. rorrard Chia ha fod y J. f.atheaek " ty City Attoeap for N—AlLOr. (l
s. roraced Clan fro ■alt! Ail. Ykar to eta City "teeny for haedfadg• (A
f. "tynutim for the Deputy city Clark m ett." ty 1931 City Clan,
laai.ce. Jmay 14-16 I. Seceowto, Ketimeed coon 3200.00.
t. Ylabars.oen[ Atratyot Sat [aleeatieg on t"uatrfal A..ousaet District. (3
Amrarat of aicasseot to allow niabureaemc Of SIS,C00 to "easaeent tatleterto3 ova
late! Couee.t for aoueaowe Dntrlee 7 }l. lye. Loco" M.0 poly be rely ursed so
the dLtrtct n appretea coed farad.
if
b. Caotlect "deadr to C.n*!!m 9troue PeaLlr..pat project, Approral of nits wo" (f
to carer the cost of ItmToral design o[ the eeqwim of • box culsort to"Ited to
cc"Imte ty Caral#ln Strout raalltea*oc.
L. OLoyard Arsaue 4*ito S*ret<eal Apprmtl of eaetr"t rlth C D Ltty*e"og to li..
cosDl*n "tbt ef. l a"alainea. railroad eeardiacim. Aed ya13n of the plap"d
earrlcu� protect. L@#e "d apyrorel y ansnet vlth the City et Ontario for e4dlat '!
.j
-'r
a.''.
City Colaatl ROVLw
MCOaMr 1, 1960
rase 1
(a) J. _, Ac"Ptooto of ,real )lap M. AOSt 4--' chat ComaLL adapt Ch. subject
eq ubich eapsiats of four "",I, J'cand m the apse" side at AlveeO Str "c.
Wt Of S'ppbiro.
WmDROd M. 90-lot
A 9150{OTION Or TR CRr C CYC32. Of R6 Cm
'tr4L NO W. 3505 CTD &Tzn PAZCArf1MC W So.
3"s).
(!0) CLrL%G of ra[wi Mq M. 39122 Mrawd that Ceoveil author!" the City
Sowed t ir'e -1' w Oita W rubjace ew. She sap cwatatt of four ",cats
toa[Twtt career of itch Scroac 'd Ju "r Strut.
rdtM== Soo go-tog
A LUOLOl M ar TR CSR CCAw. or = Crrr
of SAM® CV-LV CA. CALTIORIA. A"Wr=
r=V- MP bCMM 3911 (TZNUTM !ASCII, W.
5911). 770'C nM" AGArltmrr. M IIVSOfD=
"Cam.
(ll)
i
t
MA
(it— u" r-gftd far lack of bac3q Lfarmam).
(11) s. ARtevel of Cmtract Ste Mrrtcaa to MwhU b Coatocar T'[dsal ►actil
for ebe ►wart Modal. tiu
(13) P. Mt Mtauttar 17. 1990 for Public MarLaM w Esvirawcacal Aauasret lad
93aaaad 0.42"a ast M. 00-01 — Lowy. A rban" of coca rnwat few S•l -S
w the surttewat waters d)bcmas aoddWLiao Ijoad#t�[�L�ru ixrtd
117 lot Cwahw darelapsept CmaJ@tLM Of lid d,attiat cola. An Iw0j 19237.
(Sa) O, Mt DACeaMr 179 L$So far Publla baarty oft raatraerecal Aaa.•- ---t ad
law ChAa" 110. 00-LS — Lffiark. A ehmq of two few Ml (LLtte alricul-
Cort1) to 41 (no f"11y nald"tial) fee 11 car" locate at Of Mr716
aeecb of Ripos't'e. AN 101 -031 -71.
(ls) P. Mt pcarbbor 37. 1900 far volle beertos m tL fubatrtatw 0dtwsca.
(16) e• Auchoelutlm far Part -UWA Clark t7pLt fat 11a laeactty Mrrlcas MPatreact
chrouSh Juta 30, loot.
(17) V. Approval of rat3red try[ Cro"L9r t is ncesredad tbat commit appear
A raaol'"m aatboriilw the savor to PotiHOaa subait"d by the Mllny
lloro y-
REJOWUX M. 00.110
A SUMMON 07 TEl CSR CMM M or T12 CM
Or tAKW WCAHO CA. CAIAY MSA. AlPtprlMO A
palli011 R TILE ArMI30N, TWESA AND SACRA R
"SWAT C"AMr TO VRISTLOCT A SRS LIME An SS
tE= STRR 1,013.3 = V[ST Or toomsm
(l9) A. Auedret to city facility La"sr it to ntotaradd that Camcil teat,
ear "A'* for wles A, 1. 41 'ad C4 for • tva -yur "Arse,
taaclLaa Treat arrive at 7to9 p•s.
Ibrlwt Mond by hid". "tad'd by ralw0o to Npr.n the Getaat CALAadar
V3 -0. lt. the arc'ptl" of !t"'1' Vhich boa boom ris"w. MetLm "tried oice,c ualr
a i��
ae
pare 7 A'It, X-,
• N
'7• ML•l. Il7umy. �
9k
lA. Ag OWNA.Ct akdmMO "Iff"C tfCMthTIM, Jerry Cnet. Bgildtg�- Offr�y"al.
prssancd tha state to"".
e
t1s Cort11'o .eta cgec.ta with the ordtyora vge is Cbijta[,13, .Ut1oo 1603 r
dutiep wit] roof mnrLfo !e hltk fin boaard aru•, t4. 0.•set upLiesa the
�if M w me "Etsfled with the Cdegeitieaa ad ..tabad tto�btww the LttrrcoetfeUd
r be coold rid tine for h{rglf.
Mater sakad its City Clark to tad thl CLt1a of Ordtamce b. 571. City Clan
11u11t.es read the title. tbMger Mgr.• by Mike". n[mdd y thlahe to wive
further rgedlU. Mat14g ""1, geW.gurly Sb.
01DrL 80. 173 (first rssdiel)
AS =Mkx.t W tat CM Lam, Or TIM Clyy of
RAMP IMCAMWA- CUMW]L. ADWTM in 1979
6'I = Curt. DltlrOOt Curt IM AIATEMM M a
DAMMM WWD=. M"y 310 =j. =MM
W=00 MUM CM9, AND d1WM ft== Cltt
LUDAWI YD MUM Ca3A1t CSslit LIIttry
nectsm To tar Lom CO more.
Mayor lrhlesssr opes.d the rtifg for rebut b"riat. Address
fei Ceuveil g.nr
Mtwes Oa COMM, 3343 Las Lees. paudess. L .epletaed the dlff.rrscn
to sl a, the ... A ad costs l typo Mile, rude". 4 said it wag get agtsss.q
Clue C sbde rte Sot Jr. hilk fin board stall lieu 7w Wu pot a
that n tap of A CLUB 1 type bass.
Og VULts, STA. solid tha SLA ,,art, tb- w of fire ntardut typo rooftu ntertels
L bilk tin buts .sue. - Of og6ge.td that to stage sMta .rh rtart.ls are
ngoird that Co ewLi .1. reeetta "tnfitttgt.
Jobs Lyra, foothill pin Dtstrlct bard M.sMr, Bald that s tile roof L very Mary
M top of a burftet Most",
"rer 11.trr kwtiao.d Sattlr 1110. ttha said bar bar red" . few rest aga
that' plgeead to de tb..on Lb.relraa. She suntioed the gewHty of berme
skis ioapeetad ass ob"lelsp pgraita sites this Wald add to the teat. Mr. Crest
syl•Sed that Mss had twe required gd" the pngioge ce1u. ibia bad rt b.ae
nUtn.
Bsrrr a"41, Matins Corlast•ar. felt that these u
Ud angled .ldply adA to the wt of tha %Doss. M lraran go wt gensuay
fee 1113114 sold he dtff4rd with Mr. feyol sifts then gas a dttf•r•acd of about
73000 per 4"Lllet gdt Mtuen thew of shako wnu tile.
Mayer Schloerr closed rho 14UD haarlgt star• than to m fer,g, targets.
COBOWItUe Bridge .gid that perhaps as e."d to ter gay HM sossib si oolege far
tUV< ateroto.
K tioet M•rd by !.leeks. •atesdd by Bridle to cwtl," this 1t" to the Jsegery
y, 1931 steel. {btlgo "nisd uAlmLa_•-
17 S-0.
Mayor Sale ... r "tied s taw[ at a,LS p... no retie{ race,.."
with all sensors et the Cgr u sed stait pru.gt. at BtaO
0 2✓
City Couacll mfoutu
Oatrtae ), USO
Part A
(10)31. M02! fpmtSO OtDrytARQ AML17Itvtf domdrnta to w San `
S.tmrdw Ceuq Stet vas sod Smildled Ms."". u adopted by Ordinance
b. 17. Staff neon pnteettd by urrr eau.
Mr. Rope retuactd wt the P1mrd grelepoae`['action be referred back to w
Ptaring COoolaalom for tataastdentim taw 41 -1 ed R- 10.000 aestog dtetrt'u.
Alm. to add w gee pap 7 uhlch had em mt Wttad to Cowell prler to the
otetlAs.
fayar rotund the C197 Clock n red the title of the CrdiercA. city Clort
Ona.cou'rued w t1w of Oc/WOCA ft. 123.
OAODIUCL W. 123 (mcmd rudtes)
Y CRDIRAM Of = C"T =wm Or lE Clry
RtR[DUTfAL. N . fLAMW Dt7pD71mff. An
Awlb'smA m gS:.•rlCa or m ummct tONM
OIDRARa.
ut f1 Ibwd by M"La. eemo/N y ra)o.ho to v " (otter r&.U.S. MLI.
oam mou,17 34.
" 7fu °heeirngotd rW {lot Im p.Allo htarint. lyn MtaS m'negrote.
Cootruro Whole .aid be had mnrol rtcafteadatleeo for chant" w w ordtueta
.hick tent
Seim M) At"Ifory DW Pteattdl
(1) Cunt {tome (bathroom pluebi s aely).
(1) Stlrtta Sara" rith mp-- for o.else of A can.
(1) Rpr occmatice punt,rt m ONtnascA 77 of w City of Raow
(A) � atlas office W he located to • mobdlrl.tom, ace.
to re.a1A the oar.
:as 1(b) Aerumrf was Sonit"dl
(1) )beta or' pre'"'A pac'erc ta lattice 61.014A(b)
(c) Patti" e"gtlrmtat rmeeine tN tar.
(t) Leading 1para SNOlretmtat rastlm th seas.
(t) 11 �s Acted act t tom w tam.
(')'rent faN Di're.ices of fatal anemias w .m.
(b) :starter Sly T rd ' rastlas w teas.
(L) Sur yard 4amaLog tetulo' w mar.
U) Dfensre. Required{ ecee,a tin tam.
ft) Side Tard ►maw rwm edldtept urr atlas the 'ey.
(1) Cpce Span Spttiradl roo lm w dead..
Pap 17 W tb. uPllrut .ball obtain City Co U rpeenL for ..nbliebret of
at uy &ftrsl A mocUtlam prior tow 40111st of ap lot of secupnq
?Sao 14 (6) (11m A at w Sa tlr) the City Co'o'p shall appnn. Adlt7. or
dfeappror the sm. rbaede ad Drrtloprtt plan.
Fat. 72 (Ian) Off -Sita partied yatiiltlau be Ctq u Plseasi my .utharin mt
ran. them 10 porwt of tea reeulred Nrtia te• . mt ta h. ioesud
('am emit' the some)
hgo 13 (A) tlth Its. — To &CM.t" wan per,caaa. the Plamoteg COM1.91an is
'�eeered to n "— and 'valuate w sepltcebt. Ift. u......
!" to uch we eeb)aat to bmitoeeat &arts (rpt nulls the mein)
a.
077
Pala 56 (yT) TM City Plarm.r r li
rtotOlta a�
Yteaeap to eoebl YtlTala,aad araleatimaof toe .5
�l^
gpuuuos by the Plaml.p femmi"ie., ?he WUllttp .bell
sd by . !De uubush6d by lorl[ir `.
of the City
�aeti.
3;
(3) detus by City Plae.eft ..
Y�
,)
(A) The City Plum ahaU review the ."U"ttee for
i
Dereleysebt 9ar1ee rmd .bell nfer aW 4 Ucatim to
the tlrato9 CorLelw, al" vlth nu. et"lioY and
r
of aatod rluueo m. it Gwl• eitbu 30 dq. of Yt.pceero
"oetc 9a.iew.
,r
Cotdltces
rT loolede, bot ahau rt be H i,oi to. nao(rerec.
to "Oct.' yar". epee .Darn. boo w
n. feo, v.11a.
"I .rr.0latl [pot[rnta to[ lre.lta,
'
ep[ mint*"
d
toe. of 1r1.rr7ir9 e eeYioe eeetr.l eeeauf.tt rp.1e0-
veeta for .treat tgraneuu ed d"LutioY.
r.aelttir
of vohircl.r tatn....M.S...d trace Ureolauool
n$w)ati. of Ug*el npLatdrm been
-
of or other rberee-
terutlre of openttgl rpel[rYDn fot .etenetpte or
14014"PW ad ether i;rawratat .4[rmtuboo
t el
d9el°9vet tebadulas of cim ltd. for gft.tamce or
}
roeFl.tlas7 ad Other ate .dlttaea Y the City pleunar
r7 dre .cetsa27 to i-- uap.tlblilty pith
abrading
yrl"m tM P,6ut hatith. Solely, and e.lfen.
td ta eYbl the Pl -VAUS fooet"IM to eab. fidl.g*
the
rp.lyd by :active 63.0119($)9.
-
(t) Delete p.rwoo.
rase "OU) T HIa� toe u$ cooed .hill ea. eh. folioed.$ fi.U.tt
[let appcvrd
per.o.bc to Drveloprec Pavt.vt
(IA) Tee dectalw of ebe Plee.ie9 Coruru. 06011 be alfettin �
IA tzl.Mar do" aft.r the deco of th[ druioo
to".. to
4ypeol be. bass Mw vii, the City Co ,,,
(IA) A decisfr of the pla.t.t C eieatoo oq be teyeelsd .Kula
16 r+l.dar days to the City C.wcu by
the ePPLIroot of aey
other y.`sob " Percribed is Uctlee 61.0151.
(6t) A Derelopo,.t P.riew ee)reral sub)srt to ltyes ry be Te d
by the ylralet Corisol" for to addltlentl
Period of ao
ysaq Provibd that peter to th. arptTltLM dal, a vrltt.e
rpormt lee noweL le filed with he Plrmie9 CeaWalea.
If
the applltuto is tpyeeled to tbt City rouettl, it Y1 be e,
Y
tdod by tb. City Cooetu.
peg* 19 (11) yho City Fl., aball mae " unatig*tloe of the YPlluttoe
and Shelf Drapan .raper[ these. 061ch
MALL be ar.ueble to
,he Ciy Y r
C"oru and fiafa6 Cousioe ad to the 4PPltc"t
prlr to the public Marty.
7490 30 ($G Th. P1ao.let Co.deat" ry $feet or door to appIluclee for
$vowel. It roo A"llaup it ayp.eld to the City
Ca cu.
the City Cowell rp Veer of d4ay ee appliaa[loo for ra"val.
?-go 11 (III) Lt. 6 — within tr (7) weft" d. • follovli the data of a
dec"t a of the Cortt4too rand"
a 0a. Pecelt or laude,
"4 darolopret Firm, tb. City plarm.r sh.0 tubtdt to the
City Cowrtl Witt,* Ytita of tfu d.tulee.
a.
077
A
clty,cootu mitc.,
W.Ct 6 obr 3.
fat
1960
tso
pap 32,(l45) ippli-ti" for • CCdjtLCCCi V,.,p..dt
Olth m "pitutift Code, fteforyeefly
(Of & ChMOO le'lote bounda to
Ofted -Forty. A)ectje tb* f" C,,Ucbj6 f r be iotlwim tm,
Vu Farit Ced CC, , , - Of Oft a CoblItt.1
a CoPlitori-I
r ij
TM FICCOICLA C—Aselon
ab'U MCC Cho P-611C boortog ca the orates
Cod
tbo COOdItIona, use Permit t,tb. Goom ".ties Me
h"112,18- for It. purp,� of a" fttlft .tb@, "? the tee
caeo".t." d-C,-IoC ca the cooiLtI.&I ;or., "to of the
use
be d---W to bl• 11114 SaCO " - t application shU
M ""CoOre dM" tIt4tb="Ibt* Of OtAct000t by the City Coou
M. sactift). ounlartom. (Delete the TOCCCWsr
FASS 34 (33)
The City FLOCCO, aL31 a. Ce ore tLutlov, of the 4"IL4"m "d
se"i Pre'etr' 4 """
tNATCOO Chile ChOIL be avatiete to the
"t? Cornell and FL-00tog C'e'""Ce Me to
It' -IPII--t pri., m
the pubLie beanies.
FsS* 34 00
ltd... it ap," "
or domy, on -vPILcCZLvCb* City te�- tbo city Qna Coy pmt
fa nafti.
(10
ItLtbin m (3) vare", da"'fousmim the dats of • derist" of
the CO'Cot"Ce r"Ok"S ' fe"Coo4-
tbO City fleater sb&U it .. Idt
0 tea City C-=U wrIttee potift CC it, d&ctmim. (net of
robot. the COCO). C.ttlft
Pop 37 cu,m De"t. te, mum
Pop 3s (33)
TM City Fleeter Chou MGM C, CC the
Le UCthft anshell ►"PtIl * "fart Mrsm WCA "Au be •va"M
o t City
C—u so' Pleasies c000ttaim WA ro, tu
74LLG huriag. grtlemt 'cior to tu
tlq
U efur M me" proMT17 ftem.". " th.. at.= .Os
C, =Cf, CC "Ue b."Ut
ob.U=to the
alterearet it Y. Curb the M.M.2 CoOtt.sim
0 caeal"r.
PW H (TA)
LLM 14 — 7M Comb( "I -"if? - fl-Cowdtiva of the rimieg
Coe tissLoo Ce 4 MD" at ch"46 Cod "? rKmOt
Capon WA coolidr .
C of the C000i`4iod 02 the ftdificaUft. "(lore of fee
COOILLSIMS to Tryon elthis 30 days after
ru"Pt of the C&OCtu
l•qC40t Mall be doomed
C—c,,-- ?&,"be M*=*.w cm Ctu"j" &COCCO Ce Me 'a of the ftaterme,
04 pe's 10& 34ct"o (b)(2) ' r"C'o th"POCLU" doebAtIes by Sol.
tbm &&C SGCUM (3) — "Reaus adjostmont. -b.QU be da.rmi." aM
My"" by the Piamiag romtmsjw to City COOCJI..
■
- oacwer ]: 190 ••
i
fate
4, roel", Mo"d by Mae", tteoodtd by 9aloobt to tin Lena ndu ,
..
No- 123 Ha the tout end lenp,cp eLayu se "W"efi b a to thdutou
AM htrslf cod u ear seso" "US foe Jsoee 7 C --Neon blab '
5.0. 4 7. 1961. Motion urrted wto! ®al
y..
a-le ■ J
][. ZOBB tAl.ICf tNOLRr tttLtirrs.T inff
LeLrT eot+e. resort tnuotd be
We
'.
"SLato[ Cloy V.e,seer. Jls tutlaem, tend the LLtla of ordlooro M. 113. rotten
ros�aidos ly ""'A" bf Bridle to rein fertber
5-0.. reeding. mtim ucrt"
=MUM 0. 111 ("toed 1"Ung)
AS Ommum m M CtTT macm or m Cl2f ar
y
t�.
BABaO CU-- Olcrl. tlLSTNAA. RUCISM ASSESSOR'!
fYCTt, MOZZ 207 - ESA -49-0 Met e.1 m M7
"I
200 = MUTE ESM of ro0rlmL BOOL%YAm Vf3T
"" ATIMM
�.
ti
Schlosser o9e o,c eba seetiot for PoblLC bearlu. Then beers as reseooee.
bawl- r" r2oeel.
i
e
C`s.OelLdssl fnse settees" t e 1- -y told It be ep tM es poorl t-7
em,ld M eetPattels HN the t-1K e" felt ehr
[rtes
the
tope sop eye me ePPeopruu.
'
�0e -AI aloe gmmse q t ra aor the tnffla fees off Biter mts rmtuu
F.
!
etiss" Mss" by fret to At" the some [Mop r"o"t. for leek of a "rood the
at1".
rotim, Meted " acid" "met" by falmb b apron the m
roam cue
.
-
*.east.
utrted by tba fOUselet rout AYES, Tales -, BrLd Bsblo"ar. tOtlt
fro". AESESft Ooae. AESL20m, M gists. .,.-. ld
ItlteL s>ae"e"
nt Bide M
ebstelmd elms Me boo r" is the Heiaetf.
1P• fps[ ttA� -+ rna...T VD p.te DS9rlttnm A save; t lead lo"[" w [M meth"[[ terser or beset Lime and rcMbb refees for 16 Berea (SI
('kyle f—UT credu,t"l) u H (adalaLtntt Arcbebala fete i(.I
fort/ r":doet'" An 201 - )Bldg. 21. reynf"eimel) e" R -] (mltlple
Bet". ad SS. tuff n9on Prasoud by Beer]
Cep Citrk Warrsm rs" tiLL of osdlsaoq 00. ii{. room, tiered by Mikele.
seteeted D7 hlmbs u rain [ortMe se"ut, rotlon resoled oeraisseell 3-0
Ommla b. IS{ ("co" rodtep
AS an's -mi of TEE cm COUNCI1. or TR CUT of
BAOCeD CXA MCA. GLITOINA. RBZORM ASSUMIS
?A'= m - 201- 161 -15. 21, Am 22.
Mafor ichlseear "Good the o"ttob for Palle
he +r W. Addnuty famril vu,
1tr. A. 0.81" Vrtew. 7074 tone Areo". n" a letter rhtch be had east
to Mr. Va eases emyse"ty hu ep9ealtim to Ne pme tbeete, d neemeMed
[bee • rdteal fsetltp M tout" on thu lsvatolsr pteu or protorty.
rhea toted m fortMr Palle towesat. Moyer Sale-ter closed the palie hasten{.
�1ayE "Ri , ^^l..��:a`t':.i✓"'t= ;s�-�P
1 %.7 `.a? r i ,t ..v,• ViCtgt�C&umclL Mmuns
.eDeeeam, 7.`1960 rl �
.� *+.ata•P �r '.p
JI
' ,btlmS K"ad by rnn. oecmtad by glkels to app[arm the lem chAege,mA - 1
. Onl506ae go, 116. Xotim "tried uamAPOWl7 3-0. ,
(22) wi S0 10 - psi . 'A am- thma rgoest true W ta G -1 '
q atnt at la0d taG mn61 of Artso :LIAt T. Wt of Archibald Amapa
at the eacten taraimu of 4riaa and rlaear Street,. ASS 106 - 111 -01.
Staff rapt pnaavrd by $arty brae.
Daput7 City Clerk tararir AarLelot red title of Ordinance M. 117. littlest
Nord by Kikels, uemded by lalolo ta vairs further reading, brim "nitd
Waamuslr 7 -0.
tRCII1AK9 SD. 111 (need nAdiag)
Ag OCSOYSCZ or TU Ctu COC9ca Or SC C1SS
Or AAgtaS CUCAMI A. alavmA. 1aa1eD
MESIOa•A PALCC, SC100 106-111 -01 A= g -g
1O A -1 LOWO w TO t@i1 2=9 OFAMW
SICIDIAr Arm AM OF ASCRISAW Arr4S.
brae Sebleuer opmad the WoUN tot Public herring. Shen heing m irepeeae.
Cho b"rty au closed.
ffittmt Nerd b7 trap, mccded by ralolo to apprvre the awe Ch"go, red
Ordlaavice b. 111. Ifitim carried mialsoriS 74.
(11) AT. nygnmmttl ASSISOM W. Cm MD.
gpefer Y eNLteaee ease' ngnle..... of the lotion ed rorsm of
IS
bwlousee to Mal gtmral r in"S district., Sndf rayon Presented y
W. Vumrr. `
City Clark OAAeaere cast title of Or4LWm* b. 434. arum, brad by Mole.
secoad" by Arid" to oolre fartbai tutted. Milos carried man"eaaly 3-0.
CtO1gAiCZ W. 45-0 (termd tesdiap)
AN Ot01PAOCZ OF FKA CIS{ COOKIE OF ffi Crrf
Or LIS= tmUomt;;A. CAL%pv,=. nrA1Lr7NW
RECD :7100 FOt CIA locam Am gr7IN w A0m.7
ICSVIZSSi1 131 fIS 61 tC?WAL NIEVESS) OIZOICf.
Myer Sebloeaer pWad the snt"g for pubtle bearing. then halt, m ns sae.. the
hearing use e!naed.
betaal tarred y ►nn. wended by Mk.ie to sppten Otdleuee b. AS{. The
mein elerid omimvlr S.O.
(24) 70. ASOQ IN b. 1 10 tJaDTftPZ gISV.'C4SO[ DLnTCf W. t rA !!ASS Ms.
7116, 971), 9a N. ARO 9)d7. Start sport Pnaretd y extra SS00a._
Myor Schlosser spend the acetic{ for p,bLi, mate. Sean being meat the
Ppblte por l" sea closed.
City Cowell 3ttauna
0at.aber 3. 1900 + r
h0o y
)ouw' [tend by Meta. tatow"d by Pat,*. tea _ - :'.
ad to W"we tact". ndl ". r"u. tried go'"ton, 0ualetiao b. 806111 :1
Wanttue'rtd tltL. of ftmlutlm MCA 00 -111.. 'O.1? Y0. City Clark
.ffO=cu PD. 80 -111
A ST.9CUMOR C► Tn CM OMMLL Of Tn CIrT
Of OAfCW CC vn". CAtMIWA. OtMISC M
U rA C OWM. LCK f.�j2t.A�9tU n MRSOU 1
1
3 �
Notes. �4 TOM TS tot NM nuaa. Staff nfon Dra- (13
i The C!" had remind m 2"W far m gDtTS.O Srn itmT.3 ht.tt u rare.
that•° uvt"" ad paha [Tau IentN .c 0330 9BII a Anew. Mr. t b0 raid
that two ltenn t>artatty b.m m-
effmitiw m the ral of W cnu bad
i� ulwd by the Cie,?. ua
""a' hhtoet•er OPm.d the antlot fa[ ?Wtia hoot]".
Om OrttT..Netklai !er hie, ha
is fewer o[ hce too the trn room" rqy' �mi at We B.11awa Awoa., clot°
Bo bb term the, ttryOttt nc l- nakis is famr of nufcl" tho nom td the
t ratil" .beet dtlr1A0 the [star .aueo.
Thars b" So
pbuc genies oft then few the mdttace, htryoT BNhatmr eis.d the
5 � Hlo �e3�ta�uM that It wmU M a trim m city[ tYllua Awy
:) m? that tbtf me plmtat"is m meat w thefcity. w tnt L clam and ua
Notice' N"nd by Bridm ..etw0d b? Mesh. to ncais the ceme, ad it", ce
bllMt Ateoee and to swta'a tba OFFS". This Is to M • Prac.dmt
met of 6flam A"aa O Alm. u bane a Lim att"I met
farcical." Pieta of ?rover? a °der to Intact the future, lotto, t e[ the,
pro""" e, !' N. tithe INUaa t.trhad ti...W.l? N.
N"far Sthloteer Called a race, at 10'43 , The wt ataer[nad at lh'00 M.
with all otabors of the Cowen M staff f"not.
C P.
4. ran wrwenna.. — — I
&A._ A"M O/ 0Mtt30P r . rM � Sly Q"M SM? ST".
(SN
dryer SNIO.e,u inked Mrs. foftett to tees "cads L mid her i[ tha hm m1
futrrytftt w th • "tut to the cuff raeeseesttSao.
She .u[d LWn vu NCae
the eft ewHnttw .,, Tip would b. wllli" to SPlit the ties with
1 MIN void Srnt thu M' m ace,., After aeet dtscoom b? the
Cauactl. the fe11.H" mtlta woo aa4'
Mettw' Mowed b? ?e10a0oe Satmdd by M "I. to .flew the M,ffstm alghum
cads (lust 1901) to mince the td JUL' Coffee SheY alge. hotlw Paced by
the /ellwgo0 cent AY13' ML6le. ,L,.b.. Bridge. m, tCbletu.. t
AUDI' Mme. ?Cost SAU he ",ea.4 this bateues he felt we obw Igtl' ine[.
rd POZ33 veto
am wo Ordtvmte ad act& this eta ocathe,.
aye
h" 10
(27) ±l, OMTAA20 Ct00YT ACCL2f Ste, Staff rapart preoeo'd !
r Ligd Sabb'.
llettaat Mooed Y M ULs, y robe to
f ae"odd Cal Nptese the alLayetee of
25.000 u wr recce• sSt" .ogre the !or'a'ted feet Of tbo mtrut tar tbs Y�I
0aur,, Gteame Access Stu". 7bo 'cosset to M alloy,,/ t
latL" etWy Cued. Mpt'm'=ft" � �
•- •--ly 3-0, tat tL Poblte ctt<w
(213 dC ADIfTOf{ fif!Y79ntrt ncwMrDAnO� flc'fD[Kl m neoa ,
i ttrecrttrr. f�repptf pta'eaty y J1e A"feaM.
M +. Rule, rta� ter tL
i.' kyrio lbyn Soot to cL�i utt ath tabor, . a • Iuyr i
[tetra aft. W
ayptd. The Lt �gMafs"poa l osell'fye W 411'U tM" T1" rat
tad atyLaeul7 aoppen y ati Adrlsen CaWlouee.
lL Costa. ttlaad' roatdtar. em"tod that the CLt) Ceoo u bat. by iv"leee
L the Central flan prate',. Y eats the Co.l"tw by bey bMelnt tDpttt few
the cStLUa, ha detlatCy ua eater aWa.
DM Wr. AS""" Cosot'tiwrr
JOM Can Ltle. M
•llllle.et Fire Dlstrict BM,4 Mrlar
r"ev"yrire
Gloss rtmabea, m m"s row—,
Uab'
La/'. mtveada roaLd"t
Attu burly the rare, taw the aoflaate. the
at the Mott'. , M'Ar elaasd the rblia MmLw
' fee t'1 —s S Lice ea Lis- lt" MW abaad My the elaeud caM.tel" aW tie
they 1''117 CSOU Mt be ooporetd.
t"Mooss"U e W p"tp"a the d y ltlbela wL7an fLv"d n Catrt" I.
nou11981, At that a!" y y� l arty C°MMlty amyl
3-0. yen w retnre to the Mer'1 rector iciedul�. XotlM 1maNea
raoe'll"M Mmula "" be W "W to e" the CtMral r2an coy y tba tovoall 1.
Fbre,r7. Cartes! moet¢rd.
Wf2d lWb '4FCLf. Syrt saps[[ by
�i1M ftbl' d,,cyeLor, l[ few tM Co=CIL able 'tut be b'd an eap1o7ar
Merlwt Morse by )ttW1a. owmw.d y Faobo
lo to wtbor"a staff " rep „"a flea
aw: "tartWo c tn'ta L” d"L" "tole" tort
1. CA Crtrc "LLutfne pnpardtim end
u "[ha
peN! "rice vlti L.O.
"[hated bullet of 13.000. =LOS at
7. 71CLarla
eetlsuae aad Tb.d "t ent er 7 r!'ta DyluA' Aea1Pla I`W- With L.D. mat at u
!.000.
t
M
r
t >s
ass, I
r-
!' „�Tkwa,....<i . <_rte. er sit Wm.e..
Fs
7.'^Drtatlad Ctiedatim plaentaS W Cuiso review for Carrtsl floe
., 1� V[Ctortas Tom Vistas Idartrial Specific 11” Feim Oil Mtoetstn'? 't"�
or as urim N
td Sdt at 110.000. _. '•wi3 TIT a
1. Mast tesssg fe,ttn irrdces for Oros Arsaae. Marled Amon.,'ta�
Gems hook SritNs oad ethers Fexth Assoetstss rattiest, at u - -'
uttmaf,FaSNC of SU.No. . _ _
man:ass. carri" A I tit rost. g ratan ATltit IWaLs ['Phobos seSAN, rd Schloanr.
Is1Yt Vass. Aif[s[t hoer. -
j. MIT ATMOIT'f t 1.M t. ifun Fear[ mar.
n
5. fRTCIL 14STRr. Than wt, Pews
7. A070W1mT. I ottaat Nw d by }aloha. "ends_ i7 ttitals to al7cara n u
Oucatlrr 4srlanr mt ta rseeOwu this oosatys Wt to remasru as umdrr
11. at 7100 p•a. for a spatial Yrasumt District rrat"S at Licata het Caumait7
Cntar. Its Vedas aUrssrad at 1137 A.U.
"Fretta117t.sala.tmd.
SLY \ \++Ati�'asil�a.�it,YY
S4rarl7 Aathalet
D epaq City Clsrk
•F
.' to
S
h
S
.7
1 .M1+
Motion: Moved
Division the sal
brought back to
the following /y�
AYES: OMM:
COIMMISSIONERS:
COITiISSIORERS:
seconded by Arner to recommend to the Planning
ree and if there is proposed removal, for it to be
c Preservat.on Commission. The motion carried by
BANKS, ARNER, SCHMIDT. BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, COOPER
NONE
STAM9M
-- cerried
B. A PROPOSAL TO
AiSTORTC— 7V
RONDA. —
Arlene Banks presented the statr report.
Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing.
Frank Green, 7156 Hellman Avenue, is concerned with the hazard to traffic. He
stated that the trees are difficult to live with and dirty, and that if the
trees are to be preserved, then the City should maintain them. He stated his
opposition to Point of Historic Interest designation.
Howard Murray, 7178 Hellman, said he thought the trees are Important and he
was in favor of preserving them.
George Betzler, 7275 Hellman, stated that he was in favor of the removal and
replacement of the trees and widening both sides of the street.
Marvin Billings, 7137 Hellman Avenue, stated he would like equal setbacks an
both sides of Hellman.
HPC Minutes -3- September 1, 1988
D- /
°E`
i
Motion:
Moved by Banks, seconded by Cooper to deny the proposal t esignate
the Powelson-
Beckley House,
10213 19th Street, Rancho Cucamon as either a
Historic
Landmark or Point
of Historic Interest. The mot carried by the
followtng
vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
OANCS, COOPER, SCHMID BILLINGS
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
HASKVITZ, ARNER
-
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
ST�
-- carried
w s t s
Motion: Moved
Division the sal
brought back to
the following /y�
AYES: OMM:
COIMMISSIONERS:
COITiISSIORERS:
seconded by Arner to recommend to the Planning
ree and if there is proposed removal, for it to be
c Preservat.on Commission. The motion carried by
BANKS, ARNER, SCHMIDT. BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, COOPER
NONE
STAM9M
-- cerried
B. A PROPOSAL TO
AiSTORTC— 7V
RONDA. —
Arlene Banks presented the statr report.
Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing.
Frank Green, 7156 Hellman Avenue, is concerned with the hazard to traffic. He
stated that the trees are difficult to live with and dirty, and that if the
trees are to be preserved, then the City should maintain them. He stated his
opposition to Point of Historic Interest designation.
Howard Murray, 7178 Hellman, said he thought the trees are Important and he
was in favor of preserving them.
George Betzler, 7275 Hellman, stated that he was in favor of the removal and
replacement of the trees and widening both sides of the street.
Marvin Billings, 7137 Hellman Avenue, stated he would like equal setbacks an
both sides of Hellman.
HPC Minutes -3- September 1, 1988
D- /
°E`
IN
.'Y✓' � 'NyV'e F�uY' {� \t^`jY° y •M? +'i i'.� -- _.nR. -n .�°h'\xx M
Merle Hurtzberger; 7202+ Hellman Avenue, said she thought the trees are < ><
beautiful and stated her opposition to their removal:
Bob Kerpf, 7108 that man, stated he was neither ir. favor or against the removal', "
pe the trees, that his concern was the rock wall on the north side of his'`
property. -
Hearing no further public cement. the hearing wcs closed.
CO missimner Banks stated that the trees are aestheticrlly 'pleasing. She
stated that the Commission may need more information from Enginee ring
Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, stated that the only issue the Historic
Preservation Commission is deciding on is
stated that 11 the fo if th2 trees are significant. He
mmission decided that the trees were not historically
signtficant, the Commission could still send a message to the City Council
that the Commission would still like it to have a Special Street Designation
for improvemu:nts with the replanting of large trees, i.e, specimen size trees.
Commissioner Billings stated that these are newer trees than some to the City.
Commisstoner Banks stated that there is not a clear cut issue of owner consent
due to not dealing with one owner.
Motion: Hdved by Naskvitz, seconded by Billings to deny a proposal to
designate the Hellman Avenue Windrow as a Historic Landmark or Point of
Historic Interest, but direct the Engineering Department if there is removal
of the trees due to street widening that they be replaced with specimen size
trees by designating the street as a Special Design Street. The motion not
carried by the following vote:
AYES: C"ISSIONERS: HASKYITZ, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
NOES: CaWSSIONERS: ARNER, COOPER, BANKS
ABSENT: C%HISSLONERS: STAHM
- -not carried
Motion: Moved by Amer, seconded by Cooper, to recommend to the City Council
the designation of the Hellman Avenue Windrow as a Point of Historic Interest
with the reconaendatfon of designation as a Special Design Street, The motion
zarrfed by the following vote:
AYES: COMIISSIONERS: ARNER, COOPER, BANKS, BILLINGS, SCMIIDT
NOES: COMMISSICNERS: RAS!KVITZ
ABSENT: C"ISSIONERS: STAN
-- carried
HPC Minutes -4- September 1, 1988
City of Rancho Cutamdsp
Application for '
HISTORIC LANDRARZ DESIGNATION
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIMAT_ON
81atorle Landmark '",L Hl storic point of Interest
IDENTIFICATION
1. Common Naas s_ V e i /MA n i4mm e /a / [ /Ma)
7 Historic Naas. It knowaa
�. 3. Street or Rural lAdraaes-M a &se Ln,r. Sou of Lt ,fand,4_ ,
City$_ R. 0 Zips / 70/ county:.Sen
'7• .A sor's parcel ao492a:. SiS y.+ttaeae, L
Legal Descriptions _
i� s. prrasnt Owner. It known: racy B.O. tV Addreswc
k; City: e•C ZS a 9190 — Ownership in privet
public
e
G
1p' S. Present Oast S{ Original Bass- .j A-ir
.^, Other past uun
hers
DCSCRIPTION
6 Briefly deserit•e the present gbysloal • arance of the site or
structure and describe any na or alterations rm its original
conditions
A rntw
�rdr trf -H}r• strre.fi. T,. t�y�r -r1.�- tY(-w.t�
7 Location sketch Map (draw A label S. Approximate property sizes
site and surrounding streets, Ent 91a (!o feet)
roads, and prominent leadmarks)s Frontage
Depth
o approx. acreage
rnda B. Coodlrions (check one)
a. Facs d. D b Good
G. Fair_ d. Deteriorated_
/~ a No longer in existence_
10 Is the features a. Alteredt-941U/
b Unaltered?
\ C . 1t rurroundingat (check more than
W one if necessary)
tE, a. Open land
z b. Residential ✓
v. Scattered buildings__
d. Deansly built -up ✓
Base L,'ne e. Commercial
I. Industrial
g. Other
l
N
k -P20,
,` y.
9:
RESOLUTION NO. 57
ti A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
`S CUCAY,ONGA, CALIF(RNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE
HELLMAN AVENUE WINDROW LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE, SUUTH
OF LA RONDA AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST
till WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all c=uents on the proposed Point of
,. Historic Interest Designation and issue8 Resolution No. 88- recommending to
+ this C{tv Council that sat! point of His Interest Designation be
approved.
s'
HHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input
regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation.
S
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
i
s NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically
finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located :n the City's
right -of -way.
SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest meets the
following crTferTa established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
t Municipal Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Sialficance:
1. The proposed point of historic interest is particularly
representative of an historical period and way of life.
2. The proposed point of historic interest is connected with
a Lusiness and use which was once common but is now rare.
B Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed point of
interest is beautiful.
C. Neigghborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed point of interest materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed point of historic interest represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the copnunity.
SECTION III: Designation of a Point of Historic Intewdst is exempt
from CEQA TAFEfcre—T9. Section 15308)
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this COUn 71—nT based on the findings set forth 04ve,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City
Council does hereby approve designation of the Hellman Avenue Windrow as a
Point 0f Historic Interest.
�N1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: Mayor and Hembers of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: THOMAS HOUSE STATUS REPORT
I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomenda that the City Council receive the
omas use report and take into consideration the Historic
Presery ation Ccomission's dzsire to find a new location for this
structure by directing staff to advertise the house for sale once
all plans for a rcw use on the lot are approved. Staff further
recommends that if the hu:se is to be demolished, that staff be
directed to document the structGmro with black and white photographs
of the interior and exterior and with a plan view of the house.
I1. BACKGROUND: The City Council considered this item at its September
7 991- meeting. The Council referred the recouendation for
landmark designation back to the Historic Preservation Commission
for further review because of new information that the house would
not be moved to the Thomas Plaza. The Council requested a status
report if the recommendation were changed.
At the time the Commission made its recommendation, it seemed
likely that the house would be moved. However, after the
Comission made its decision, staff learned that the project
contractor thought that moving the house would be too expensive,
that It did not have sufficient architectural detail to warrant the
expense, and finally that the house would contribute to a parking
shortage and therefore could not be moved to the site under any
circumstances.
The Commission had also recommended to the Planning Commission that
the conditions for a proposed office Project for this site include
the developer making a good faith effort to have the house moved,
and if no one wants to move it, that it not be demolished until the
developer documents the house with a plan view and photographs, and
that a demolition permit not be issued until a letter to the City
Planner is received which indicates financial backing for the
project to avoid having it demolished and nothing built in its
place. The Planning Comission voted to impose the conditions only
if the City Council designated the house as a landmark.
M
V, 4
CITY CWWCIL:,MA4,�' iEP6kT)
THOOM
'October;-19,�J998',r01
Page 2'
111. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: The Hfitoric Preseriati6n-
GOMMIsslOn ' vOttd..11-u,-- J: absent..,not to 'recommend -landmark
designation becausi...,Iacking-owner'consent, thi, building did.-not
meet all (of,"the•'criteMs, ln,.the' 'new owner : consint—.pol icy:.,-" The
Commission agre'ed:.'-?that.' 'designation '-would tect-'_the
building. The, Commission,; feel .that; house , had F 94at
historical
value because members of the4homas family-had lived, In
it for-40 years;: from the.'192Vs to the 1960's*,' and-wanted.,�16 sea
4.
the house' preserved- if.-'poisible.-- TWCoamisslon -also inclided In
their motion to ietain' the house 06, the.;l Ist of potential landmarks
in the event that W-house is moved, and a new owner in the futarel
is interested In"preserving*this Potential landmark.
Re full f t
t',
BI
�N
City anner
City an"r
BB.*AB:mlg
Attachments: A. Memorandum to Planning Commission
B. City Council Staff Report of August 17 and all
,
attachments
C. October 6 Historic Preservation Commission Staff
Report
D. Historic Preservation Commission Mnutes of October 6,
1
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
CITY OF RANCiIO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
September 1, 1988
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Chairv,:n and Members of the Historic Preservation Comission
Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
M
SUBJECT: THOMAS HOUSE SITE, 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA (OR
88 -I')
I. BACKGROUND:
A. Pur ase: The purpose of this Memorandum is to explain the
reason ng behind the recommendations to the Planning
Comisston from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding
the site of the Thomas House. Attached are the Historic
Preservation Commission and City Council Staff reports as well
as the Archeological Resource Review from the Archeological
Information Center.
S. Recommendation for Landmark Desi nation: The consultant who
con c e a survey o s r ca resources in 1987 listed the
house as having local, county and state significance, and the
City's "Designated and Potential Historical Site List"
Indicates that it has potential National Register status. The
consultants determined that the house is significant because
it was built and owned by the Thomas family, obviously a
family of local historical importance.
The house was scheduled to be considered for landmark
designation at a later date but was taken out of sequence
because of the proposal to build an office building on the
site. In determining historical significance, the Historic
Preservation Commission considers the information in -the
historical survey that staff has developed against criteria
listed in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The house was
recommended for landmark status because of the importance of
the Thomas family and because there was a possibility that it
could be moved onto the site of the Thomas Plaza. Landmark
status would mean involvement by Historic Preservation
Commission in the review of the new site and the
rehabilitation of the building.
C. Recommendations to the Plarnin Comisston re_ 9arding Moving
e moue that a project under consideration will not have an adverse impact on the environment. The "environment' includes
ON'
DA9 v
THOMAS HOUSE
September 1, 1988
Page 2
historically significant buildings. (CEQA, Appendix. G
Significant Effects, •A project will normally have a
significant effect an the envirorment if it will:.... (j)
disrupt or adversely affect a prehistoric or historic
archeological site or a propart/ of historic or cultural
significance to a community or ethnic o; social group...'; and
CEQA, Environmental Checklist, Ii 2o.
If a project may have an adverse effect, either an EIR must be
prepared which, among other things, considers feasible
alternatives, or a mitigated negative declaration is issued
which satisfactorily mitigates the adverse impact. The
conditions that a good faith effort be made to move the
building and an amount equal to the cost of demolition be
contributed toward the moving of the building appeared to be
appropriate mitigations. (A'; the time these conditions were
written, there seemed to be a good chance that the house would
be moved to the Thomas Plaza).
D. Conditions for Demolition royal: The condition about
ocumen ng u ng s to be demolished was
proposed as a mitigation because of the importance of the
Thomas family to this community. Documentation consists of
black and white 35 ms photographs of all elevations of the
building and the garage, a site plan, and plan view of the
house. This information is placed in the Historic
Preservation Commission files along with historical
information, to be used as a community resource and for future
histortans.
The condition of not demolishing the building until a letter
regarding financial ability to undertake the development is
presented came from the experience with the Klusman House
which was demolished and nothing developed in its place. The
reaction to that unfortunate circumstance was that it should The Historic Preservation
understands thatnnot everything can be saved. but itoat least
wants assurance that as much of the City's heritage as
possible is kept and that something good is replacing the
historical buildings that are lost.
Condition Re ardin tha Reed to
h , odre Acheolo ica
l urve po e
Its tlt env ronmen a Crcnqu uct an
c eps archeological iIad reenylearnedthatthestateAcheoogicalnformation
Center at the San Bernardino County Museum is available to do
reviews for CEQA purposes, giving their professional opinion
on the need for further archeological work on sites proposed
dC//
Y✓
v'
w
ti
for development. This project was one of two that staff sent
to the Center as a demonstration, at no'charge of the services
it has- toioffer. The report, indicated, among other things,
that the potential for, the pressnce'of archeoloylcal' resources
was unknown and therefore a field monnaissance survey should
be done and appropriate mitigation rxasures should be proposed
based on the findings. Therefore,- staff, proposed an
archeological survey. The report indicated that an
envfronmentcl impact -review shouldi be prepared, but staff
thought that a condition prescribing a reconnaissance and
follow -up was sufficient.
II. CONCLUSION:
In the future, Historic Preservation Commission staff reports and
other back -up material will be forwarded to the Planning Commission
whenever there are recommmendations from the Historic Preservation
Commission to the Planning Commission• and the Historic
Preservation Commission will keep the Planning Commission infortmed
about its on -going art lvlties. In this way. the Historic
Preservation Commission hopes to improve its communication with the
Planning Commission.
BB:mlg
cc: City Attorney
Historic Preservation ComrAission
Lester Ross, Archeological Information Center
Brad Buller
Larry Henderson
Chris Nestman
City Council
Ed Combs
Attachments: A: Historic Preservation Commission and City Council
Staff Reports on the Thomas House
8: Archeological Information Center Report
2�9 a-
1:
I
al
THM HOUSE
ti
September 1, 1988
Page 3
Y✓
v'
w
ti
for development. This project was one of two that staff sent
to the Center as a demonstration, at no'charge of the services
it has- toioffer. The report, indicated, among other things,
that the potential for, the pressnce'of archeoloylcal' resources
was unknown and therefore a field monnaissance survey should
be done and appropriate mitigation rxasures should be proposed
based on the findings. Therefore,- staff, proposed an
archeological survey. The report indicated that an
envfronmentcl impact -review shouldi be prepared, but staff
thought that a condition prescribing a reconnaissance and
follow -up was sufficient.
II. CONCLUSION:
In the future, Historic Preservation Commission staff reports and
other back -up material will be forwarded to the Planning Commission
whenever there are recommmendations from the Historic Preservation
Commission to the Planning Commission• and the Historic
Preservation Commission will keep the Planning Commission infortmed
about its on -going art lvlties. In this way. the Historic
Preservation Commission hopes to improve its communication with the
Planning Commission.
BB:mlg
cc: City Attorney
Historic Preservation ComrAission
Lester Ross, Archeological Information Center
Brad Buller
Larry Henderson
Chris Nestman
City Council
Ed Combs
Attachments: A: Historic Preservation Commission and City Council
Staff Reports on the Thomas House
8: Archeological Information Center Report
2�9 a-
1:
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUC.IMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 6, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation
Commission
FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner
BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
SUBJEST: RECONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION
OF THE THOMAS HOUSE, 7980 VINEYARD, RANCHO CUCA140WA -
APR: 207 -102 -09
I. BACKGROUND: On July 7, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission
vo e - , 2 members absent, to recommend to the City Council
designation of the Thomas House as a landmark. The main reasons
for the recommendation were that the house was built by and lived
In by members of the well -known Thomas folly, and It is an example
of a modest and simple 2920's California bungalow that has not been
remodeled. The Thous family owned and ran the most notable and
historic winery In the area, and were influential in organizing the
local grape and wine industries.
The PlanningtoCommission i rvthat they Commission
a
proposed office building on the site with provisions to help
preserve the house. The conditions were that the house be moved to
a suitable location and an amount equal to the cost of demolition
be used to help finance the move. If, after a good faith effort to
move the house, no one comes forward who wants to move it, a permit
for demolition should not be issued until building permits are
ready to be issued and a letter is received by the City Planner
avoidnwhatghappened in to lthefor
Kiusmathe npHou e) Another
has secured
su suggested
condition was that the house be documented with a floor plan made
of the house and photographs. (See September I Memorandum to the
Planning Commission).
The Planning Commission recommended that these provisions apply
only if the City Council designates the house a landmark.
At the time that the Historic Preservation Commission made its
recommendation, it appeared that there was a good chance that the
house would be moved across the street to the site of the Thomas
y) Plaza. Since that time, the Thomas Plaza engineer
a ,Cu
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
THOMAS HOUSE
October 6, 1988
Page 2
evaluated the situation in more detail and advised the project
manager not to move the house because it was too expensive,
indicating it would be cheaper to build a replica than to move the
Hoving theeihouse also could ontributeatoya hparking shortage. The
lack of any special architectural details of interest also
contributed to the decision not to move the house. Staff has not
received any figures on the estimated costs of moving (and
rebuilding the foundation and porch, which is also rock), but
consideration of this was not a requirement of the Thomas Plaza
project.
II. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council considered the landmark
Eds Cnaebs had reques�era7.contluuuaatioo afro after the August H17
meetfn9. The three Council members that were present voted to send
the ttae back to the Cooission for reconsideration in light of the
new information that the house *cannot be moved'. Council members
also expressed the opinion that the fact of ownership by a well
known family was not enough to warrant designation, that a landmark
should be the site of an important event or a place that was well
known to the public and contributed to the development of the
community, such as the winery itself.
The Council asked to receive a status report if the commission
changes its recommendation, or to have the matter brought back if
the Commission wants to keep the recommendation.
III. OWNER CONSENT: Mr. Combs had expressed the opinion that he did not
wan o o anything that would cost him any extra time or money,
and since landmark designation would mean that he would have to
spend some of both (trying to find a mover and documenting the
house), he could be said to oppose designation. However, at the
designation really meeting, and 0sob was said
not sure i whether or not wbat
opposes it.
If we can designation because of his Opposition to obstacles stopdevelopingaan
office project on the site, we may consider whether the house meets
the owner objection override polity 'tests' discussed at the last
Historic Preservation Commission meeting. They are as follows (not
final wording):
A. Has the propa.ty been identified as having potential national
and /or state register status and does it stand out as having
special architectural and /or historical significance? and
d / /
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
THOMAS HORSE
October 6, 1988
Page 3
B. Could designation help to protect the structure?
Response to A:
(1.) The consultant evaluated the structure as having
potential local, County and State (not national)
significance.
(2.) It does not stand out as having special architectural
impor`ance, and
(3.) Whether it stands out as having special historic
significance is a debatable point. There are few necks
as important to our local history and as well recognized
in the community as Thomas. The family built and owned
the house. Members of the family lived in it for forty
Years. Therefore, the property does stand out as having
some special historic significance.
Response to B:
In staffs opinion designation will probably not help to
Protect the structure. This was acknowledged in the
recommended conditions which assured at best the Louse
will be moved, at worst it will be demolished and
pictures taken. It should be noted here that at the
Council meeting the discussion included the phrase 'the
house cannot be moved', which is not quite accurate
because Just about anything can bs moved, but the
likelihood is small that it will be moved. If the
Thocas Plaza did not find it to be cost effective, it is
doubtful that someone else will.
However, if the office protect is not built and the house is
maintained and not left vacant, it could conceivably be
incorporated into a master planned development for the whole
block. Staff, therefore, would recommend that if the Commission
decides not to recommend designation as a landmark, the house
should remain on the list for future consideration.
iV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation
sus o
onm f n reconsider its recommendation to the City Council and
not recommend designation because designation 1s without owner
consent and will probably not help to protect the house.
,COWISSION STAFF REPORT
Staff also recommends that the house not be deleted from the list
Of potential landmarks, but retain a potential locll and state
landmark notation.
Respectfully� sutmitted,
Larry Hendarson
Senior Planner
LH:AB:mlg
Attachments: Staff Reports of June 2,
1988 with attachments 1988, July 7, 1988 and August 17,
e
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 17, 1988
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS ROUSE 7980 VINEYARD
I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends
`Efi—AtfFe-7W Council designate The Thous House, 7980 Vineyard,
Rancho Cucamonga, a landmark.
II. BACKGROUND: This site was brought to the Commission's attention in
connec
EFT with a proposed office building (DR 88 -11). Its status
on the list of designated and potential landmarks is PLL/PSL /PHL,
Potential Local Landmark, Potential State Landmark, and Potential
National Landmark. The reason for its significance is its
association with the Thomas Vineyards Winery. It was built in 1926
by H.H. Thomas and sold to L.R. Thomas who owned it until 1941; it
then was transferred to William L. Thomas. It is a simple
When this house was first being considered, there appeared to be s
good possibility that the building could be moved onto a site
within the Thomas Winery Plaza complex across the street. It
appears, however, that the cost of rebuilding the rather higgh
foundation, rewiring and making other changes for commercial use is
too high to make moving feasible, according to Rudy Stroink,
Project Manager for the Thomas Winery Plaza development.
The owner, Edward R. Combs, is opposed to designation and to
anything that would delay or add costs to his office project. The
Commission did not expect that the building would be retained on
site; however, the Commission did want to encourage its
preservation by encouraging it to be moved.
III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: The Historic Preservation
omm ss on vo a sen , to recommend designation of the
Thomas House as a landmark. They also included recommended
Conditions of Approval in the hopes of encouraging tie relocation
of the house:
r �
.6„
a
CI'rY COUNCIL STAFVREPORT,•,
THOMAS HOUSE` :.
Aagamst 17, 1968 "
Page 2 ;l
1. That the house be moved to a suitable location, and° the
developer ,contribute toward the move an amount equal to the
cost of demolition,`or,'
2. If the structure cannot,be rived, that a -demolition permit not
be issued until- building,permits are ready to be issued and a
letter received guaranteeing that financing has been secured.
In um
addition, '. the', house should be fully 'docented with
measurements, photographs, and further research..
The reason for the second recommendation is'the experience with the
Klusmen House that-,was demolished- and no project built. These ,
conditions are reasonable in that the demolition of a historically
significant structure is.considered an environmental impact under
CEpA (California Environmental quality fzt),'that must be mitigated
unless an Environmental Impact Report is prepared iand a statement
of overriding considerations adopted. Therefore, these two
conditions could be used as mitigation measures for a Negative
Declaration for the office project.
4 R ect 1 ,
ad Du
C mn
BB:AB:mlg
Attachments: Historic Preservation Commission Staff Reports
Site Plans
Resolution
t
,ma
^•r r--e•) w'3.� " ^..A.w, X ,ay,, t`.y �v �',.
�Y.. t �`; �i a,�� "u '.'�', tM��.'K�r.Y � r.�.p� "� :�+ { A•l �' cd'•.: �' ,. n o r� .. •.'Z.[- :?)1.. t , •_ Ci:. t ciw•Ca;
c _�„�,k C1ty ot.Eaecho Cueuoa[a . s ^brck ?,��«
t �' .r3Ip=31Ci'Anwa DruGHATION
83810SIC'POINT OF IAMEST DESIGNATION
x Hiatotlo Landmark Hlatorto point of inttireat
S
^ IDEIRI►ICATION ' r
^1. Commod Naart Thomas House•
' 7. 6Ristartti N". 11,ka6'was Thomas Hoot,
J. Sttoet or BYra14ddru/s . 79au YlreraM Are," ,
CStft_ Rancho ^fuumige tlpr^91730. COaatyl ion kerns Mlno
Aaaeewr'a paroiliNo._ x07402 -09 touts_jC,lL j) Hire egrc.
Wp1 Description t��file Fan,
A. Prix at Oiavr ,', if- knout, rd [cabs Address's aii `Y' eenerss
Cit7t Uotanal. tip/ 91706 Onnerahlp tat Pub"i
> �^ iT
ge —
S. Pn,;iK tla,' atdence OrigComl ON, Residence
a. —
Other put ua*rt
DESCRIPTION
d. ,Brlefly describe toe pre*eat phrafeal a0oare0ce of the alt* or
atraoture ad doaaribe tay.ses or alteratloia M. Its, Grits..,
o0ndltla /t�.t9 state Iola'- 'a_very ifa01 'e^ 1 Nth f•11
length r,Cessid m. b, river rock foun_datlon aM ,oreh -f-n and cla,6o M
sidlnq,
T. LOCatIOR sketch step (draw A label
alto and eurrounding atresta,
reads, and pacmineaL lssdaarts),
h. APprozla►te Property size,
Lot Size (in 1taei)
rronczge 170
Depth 160
or approx. acreage
B. Conditions (check one)
a. Eacell*at— b. Good_
c. T/It = d. Deteriorated_
e. NO longer In ealetwCe_
30. Ie the features a. Altrred7_
Is. Unaltettif 1
11. Surroundinges (check more that
one It necessary)
a. Open land
b. Seelden :le f _
c. Scattered bdlldinge .x
d. Densely built -up x
0. Commercial x
0
`)
17. Threats to Biter
a. Nons kaosn__ b. Private develnnment-_&_ a. ZOO le�„�t
�.
d. Public Works Prolect�_ a. Vandsliea_� t. Other_ /t °�
10. Dates of eaclonsd ptotusrapb(s) 1987 r• 'Y '�
{ r.'
NOTRt The following (Itema 11 -19) are to ntcvetuns Daly. _s
id. Primary exterior bul3dSng material: A. 9tooe�_ D. Oriek,__ '+
a. Stucco_ d. Adobe_ e. Wood x t. Other
�)^
18. Is tba Structures a. On its original eit0 x (
D., I(ovedT e. Dnkass"?
e
Id. year of Initial Constructions 1926
Tula Date 1st a. ?actual x b. Estiasated
•'
17. Arebitsot (it knowa)t
r
`
18. EYSlder (it knowo)s H.N. Thomas
;�(1+
19. Relatid ?eatureas a. Earn b. Carriage boues
.x�.
0. Outhouse d. Bbed(s) e. Formal Garden(m) .�
3.
f. Windmlll g. Watertoeer /taaktouse a
vy
b. Other i. Nome
i
S)GNIIICANCR
20. Briefly state historical and /or arebitectural Importance (include
dates, everts, and persons associated with the site when known):
!
Built by and ter the Thomas family of Thnaus rireyerds (sea State Inventory torso)
21. Main there of the historic resources (chock only On@)t
a. Architecture___ b. Arts A Leisure
a. gcomomic /Industrial x d. Goverament -
e. Exploration/Settlement f. Military
g. Religion h. Soclal /Education -_
33. Sourcest List books, documents, Arrvge. Perscmal 10t0[yleeO.
and .heir date@:
13. Date fors prepared stay. 1988 By (nane)s Arlene Banks
Address, City: _— 21pt—
Phnnei Organizations city 41 Rancho cucacon9a
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 2, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation
Commission
FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner
BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE 7980 VINEYARD, THE TMMAS HOUSE, A
HISTORIC LANDMARX - APN: 207- 102 -09
I. ACTION REWESTED: That the Historic Preservation Cosmission
eessignate roe Inoma s House a Historic Landmark.
II. SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Location: The site is located near the southwest corner of San
ernar no Road and Vineyard; it is north of the Thomas
Brothers Winery.
8. Site Land Use - �oning - General Plan Designation: The site is
a single fame y muse, s zon ng is derermined by the
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. It is zoned CC, Community
Commercial (includes a wide variety of uses including drug
stores, supermarkets, and commercial recreation uses for
neighborhood /district level commercial goods and services). It
has a Commercial General Plan designation. The site is part of
the Foothill - Vineyard A:tivity Center, in Subarea II.
C. Surrounding Land Uses - Zoning - General Plan Designation:
North - Single family residential• "oned MR, Medium Density
Residential (8 -14 units oc, ccre) in the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan. Designatdd M, Medium
Density Residential (B -la units per acre) in the'Land
Use Plan of the General Plan.
South - Large, mostly vacant lot with a residence at the
southern edge; Zoned CC Community Commercial,
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan
designation is Commercial.
East - Across Vineyard the land is currently vacant, but the
Thomas Brothers Winery mixed use comuercial project
has been approved. The land is zoned CC, Community
Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
General Plan designation is Commercial.
3DI
■
a,
0
i
'a
a
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
THE'THONAS HOUSE Y
June 2; 1988
Page 2
West - Multi- family apartment'buildings; Zoned CC, Community,
Commercial, foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
General Plan designation is Commercial.
D. Oescri tion: The house is a simple and plain Craftsman -
nr U e- ngalow with horizontal clapboard siding, exposed
rafter tails, a front facing gable roof, and full length front
porch, a river rock foundation and rock porch piers. Square
posts support the porch roof. There are wood frame sash
windows and cornerboards.
III. ANALYSIS: "
A. Back r c s round Currant: This house is on the list `of potential'
fiT
s s an was scheduled for a hearing in 1990. It is
identified as being of potential state and national interest.
It has cone to our attention because of a proposed office
development which would probably lead to Its removal.
B. Background - Historic: The house was built by H.H. Thomas in
7426 a en so --to L.R. Thomas, according to the State
Historic Resources Inventory form. L.R. Thomas owned it until
1941 when it was transferred to Marie J. Thomas who held it
from 1941 to 1942 when it was transferred to William L.
Thomas. It is one of several structures around the Thomas
Winery built and used by the Thomas family.
C. _Signifiance: This house has some signifcance because it has
noT— eltered and is an example of a simple Craftsman
infl uenced bungalow. It gains most of its signiflance,
however, from the fact that it is associated with one of the
prime historical sites in the City, the Thomas Winery, and was
built by and for members of the family as they built up their
vineyards and their winery business.
D. Cit Policies: The City's general policy to preserve sites of
s or c n Brest is applicable tq this property. It is shown
on the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan map but the Plan does
not mention tha historic significance of this building.
E. Issues: There is a question about whether to office complex
cou incorporate a bungalow into its plan. There is also a
question about whether future street widening would encroach
upon the structure which is already close to the right -of -way.
. - .3Da-
,:
SSI0N
Page 3
If this stru %Lure is determined to have historic significance
and is recofnized is either a Landmark or a Point of Historic en dewlitionts;;of lsuchThaCstructure Enwouldd bel anli adverse
environmental inpict and,aitigations�weuld'have to be proposed
and IN
lairpted° to lessen this` impact, (or a 'Statement,,of
Overriding )Considerations' must be ultimately issued which
spells out'exactly why the adverse impacts cannot be'mitigatid
and stases the reasons that the proiect should go forward
despite the adverse impacts:) Mitigations could take the fona
of adaptive reuse or moving.
F. Environmental Assessment: Designation of a Historic Landmark
s exempt ru requirements (Article 19, Section 15308).
Iv. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The structure meets several criteria of the
W r c reservation Commission Ordinance.
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical style.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building
which was once common but is now rare.
3. The proposed landmark was connected with an important
family.
4. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use
which was once common but is now rare.
8. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community and city. (Ordinance 70 S9,
1979).
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily
epor . as spoken to the owner, Mr. Ed Combs.
a
J
HISTORIC PRESERYATION COMISSION
THE•THOKWHWSE
June 2 1988
Page 4
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends -that the Historic Preservation
M&M�s-onrecammendi- td the city council that the Thomas House be
designated -4 Historic Landmark.
Respectfully submitted,
J" o Henderson
�
Senior Pla nner
LH:AB•m4
Atta.hoents: Resolutions
Site Location
MIN i
16
duce of Ghroma —The Ries... A'w So, No.1730 — 57
O EPA RTM ENT OF PARKS AN O R ECREATION HABS...HAER.LCC.SHL No. _NR status-
UTM• A 11-44171n.1779 '7n C
HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY 8 0
IDENTIFICATION
1. Common name:
2. Historic name. Thtynas house
3. Street or rural address: 7980 Vineyard Avenue
City Rancho Cucamon0a Z7 91730 County San Bernardino County
A. Parcel number 0207- 102 -09
S. Present Owner: William W. Nix Adorns: 578 N. Armsley Souare
City Ontario zip 91762 Ownership a: Publrc Prnae X
e. Present use: residence Ofiginal use: residence
DESCRIPTION
7a. Arrs,nerurallwie: Craftsman Bungalow
7b. Briefly detentes me proant paypcaHppeannce nl the ute or avucmn and describe any major alterations from Its
original condition:
A single story rertangular structure of wood construction Roof is front gable,
with wood •hinglcs Rafters are exposed Siding is wood clapboard Windows are
in groupings of Three, of narrow double hung windows located on either side of a
fixed double sash. Front door is multiple panel with an upper panel of glass and
lower panels of wood An integrated prrch is located along the front of the
structure, with rock base pillars supporting rectangular wood pillars extending to
the telling and a wood balustrade with an "X" pattern Front porch is of wood with
concrete steps extending straight out Foundation is wash rock A small extension
is located to the rear of the structure with shed type roof There is some mature
shrubbery along foundation A separate garage is located to the rear of the
structure, with side gable roof, wood clapboard siding, double hung windows and
standard garage door
OPR 5231Rw. 11/851 • ���
8. Construction date:
Estimated Factual _1_926
9 Architect unknown
10. Budder H H Thomas
11. Approx. Property also (m feet)
Frcnuge .120 Depth r
or approx. outage
—
12. Ostals) of enclosed PhorographlA
July 1487
,E
P'
;I
m
M Condition: Exultant ._Good _ Fair X Oaterlorsted _ No longer in existence,
14. Almadorm: None apparent
Is. Surroundings: (Check More men we It n•cuun/ Optn land_satnr•d buildings L_ Oant•ry bolt -W
Residential X Industr4l—commercial 1(_0Nat
t& Threats to sim None known_PrNats 4MIOPmnt x Zoning _ Vandalism
public Works Praha _ other.
17, lethetttvcture: oniumiginaldta? X Mvid?_ Unknown?
1& Petaled futures: N/A
SIGNIFICANCE
19. Briefly state histuwal nd /or architecture knpersana (Induda date, wwo, and persona asttdsted with the ut•J
andsused by members rof the Thomas family and dbysoe ofethe workers at thetWiner built
Winery.
This particular structure was built in 1926 by H. H. Thomas, and was then sold to
L. R. Thomas who owned the structure from 1926 until 1941. It was transfered to Marie J.
Thomas from 1941 to 1942, and then was transfered to William L. Thomas
20. Men theme of the Mnorlc reiatt": (If mare then oM IS
checked, number in old" of Imporunu.l
Ard ltaaure AM & Letup
Econarnkfinduttrial XExptarsuon/Settl•mwht
Gorumnant Miliury
R691an Sodal /Edueatian
21. Sources (List books. document. tuner. personal lntMh ws
and their dam).
A Field Guide to American Houses,n
Virginia d Lee McAlester: San Bernardino
County Assessor Records: personal inter-
view with Ada Cooper, November 1987.
22 oats corm w•Parad November 1987
By (name) Lynn err
Organintlon
GN zip
—
Phone:
Loutlonal sketch MAP (draw and lent slu one
mmunding streets, roads, nd prominent landmarks):
3o�
[� \pF is
Nossir
feasatr
ss uenAir
U..4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1908 mmg'
TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner
BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEYARD
I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued at the June 2, 1988 Historic
reserve on Commission meeting. The Commission wanted an
opportunity to consider the relationship of the house to the
proposed Site Plan and to see how the widening of Vineyard Avenue
would affect the house.
Attached is a copy of the existing site plan, elevations, grading
plan, landscape plan, and the proposed site plan. The existing
house and garage would have to be removed to execute the Plan as
shown. According to Engineering staff, widening of Vineyard Avenue
would leave an ample parkway in front of the house. The proposed
office structure is even slightly closer to Vineyard.
II. UPDATE: The Thomas winery Plaza across the street from this house
may -e able to incorporate the house in its development which
includes an adaptive reuse of existing buildings as well as new
construction. The project manager, Rudy Stroink, is considering a
number of questions about the cost of moving, the feasibility of
renting the space, parking spaces, and other considerations before
he can recommend such a move.
The owner of the house, Ed Combs, is opposed to anything that could
delay building his project.
III. RECUHENDATION: Staff still recommends that the Historic
reserve an ommission recommend designation of the Thomas House
as a landmark because of its association with the Thomas family as
explained in the June 2, 1988 staff report. Furthermore, staff
recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend to
the Planning Commission that they condition their approval of the
design of the proposed office buildings with one of the following:
1. That the house, and if possible the garage, be moved
to a suitable location off the property, such move
to be partially funded by the developer (at least
f , high end cost 0 demolition).
3D
Fa HPC STAFFREPORT�
HISTORIC LAkgiAPoC "— THOMAS HOUSE j ;,
July 7, 1988 :, r A--,. ;
Page 2 -
• -5
2, If after a good'faith effort there is no place to
which to move the structure(s), that a permit for
demolition cannot be issued until, building permits
for the project are ready, to be issued and a letter .
is received by the City Planner guaranteeing' that
financing for the ,protect has been secured.*-- --The,
Thomas House must be fully documente`' with
photographs, drawings, and further research by, a
professional historic preservation consultant to
create as cw:plete a record as possible of the- "
Respectfully submitted,
Larry Henderson
Senior Planner
LH:AB:te
Attachments: Site Utilization Map
Building Elevations and Section
Conceptual Grading Plan
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Site and First Floor Plan
t:
t
1
i
MEOW K p
D
W
CITY OF
R.AINCHO CLCAMON(;A
PLANNING DIVISION 3V9
V
NORTH
rm%t,
TrIUS Thomas %Rouse
EXHIBI SCALE: —
Acting Chairmen Banks stated that the idea of moving the rn was presented to
the Etiwanda Hfitorical;Society, but it is reelly too b She stated that
maybe they could deslgm the new barn as a replica and se-the siding from the
barn. She stated that she was concerned over the t limit given by the
Water District to move the barn .
Arlene Banks stated that It was her understand 9 that the 30 to 60 days was
to decide if the Etiwanda Histori/designation , s interested, not to make the
arrangements.
Larry Henderson stated that the 1s concerned about liability if
there was a fire.
Comfssioner Amer moved tc reco. of 9370 Etiwanda Avanue, the
Etiwanda Grape Products Co., as a oric Interest to the City
Council for approval. Commissionconded the motion. The motion
was carried by the following vote
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARHER, HASKYITZ, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER
NOES: COfMIS5 NONE
ABSENT: COMISS BILLINGS, SCHHIDT
-- carried
Arlene Banks question mmission agreed with staff as to
documentation of t7rr uilding.
The Commission coned.
A # # # # A
E. A PROP OSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEYARD. A HISTORM
ramm�nr�
Arlene Banks presented the staff report.
Acting Chairman Banks questioned if the City Council Resolution would be able
to include the two recommendations to the Planning Commission. She stated
that she wanted the City Council to be aware that the Historic Preservation
Commfsslon is aware of owner opposition and is taking mitigating measures.
Larry Henderson stated that the City Council would receive all copies of the
previous staff reports and the Historic Preservation Commission's to the Planning Commission.
Arlene Banks stated that this item would first go before the Planning
Commission.
HPC MINUTES -5- JULY 7, 2988
31 o
C
v
Acting Chairman Banks re- opened the public hearing. Hearing noone, Acting
Chairman Banks closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Cooper moved to recoaend designation of 7980 Vineyard, the
two additional recommendations dations tto the PlanningdCommission. Commissioner Sttams
seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COiMISSI0NER5:
F.
COOPER, STA'M, ARNER, BANKS, HASKVITZ
NONE
BILLINGS, SCFMIDT
Arlene Banks presented the staff report.
Acting Chairman Banks opened the public
John Liao, owner of the property, stated
initial review. He stated he is still i
he worked with the architect to incorp
stated he will suffer a biy loss with
will be compensation for his loss.
-- carried
have presented the plan for
n to the designation, but
$e into the design. lie
He questioned If there
Victor Pales, architect with Inlan Oestgn, architect for this project, stated
that it was unfortunate his clfen was not aware of the possible designation
before he purchased the land and subeitted the first site plan for review. He
stated the density cannot be ma tmized with the house left on the property.
He stated that a better design could be done without the house. He stated it
will become an economic hards ip trying to incorporate detailings from the
existing house.
Acting Chairman Banks clos�d the public hearing.
Larry Henderson s/aut t in response to Hr. Ltao's question, the City has
no mechanism for compensation to the developer.
Brad Buller, CiL.v stated that the majority of developments with a
maximum of 14 dwats per acre usually get about 10 -11 dwelling units
per acre, which i6f maximum density.
Acting Chairman Bed she would like to see the four units in front of
the house be move ter visibility.
HPC MINUTES -6- JULY 7, 2988
311
A
W
Linapprove<( minufes
A PRODOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOWIS HOUSE VINEYARD AVLWJE �D7
Arlene Banks presented the staff report.
Commissioner Arner stated that most of the older bungalows were built on rock,
so probably most would not be able to be saved.
Larry Henderson stated that the Thomas Winery project was being reviewed this
evening at Design Review, and they were deleting the building area where the
Tohams House would . have been placed. He felt perhaps someone else could move
it to some other locatica.
Coax :stoner Haskvtt_ suggested obtaining the bidder's list from the Ledig
House and seeing if any of those parities would be interested In the Thomas
House.
Chat man Schmidt opened the public hearing. Hearing no cements. the public
hearing was closed.
Motioa: Moved by Billings. seconded by Haskvitz, to accept staff's
recommendation to rescind designation of the Thomas House as a Landmark or
Point of Interest, tut to retain the house on the survey list and to send a
letter to the bidder's list from the Wig !louse. The motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BILLINGS, HASKYITZ, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, COOPER, STAMM
L-- carried
f f f f
-C\ 1A PROPOSAL DESIGNATE THE ALTA LOMA CITRUS I ' PACKING _2 -
Arlene Banks, scclate Planner, presented the staff report.
Larry Henderson, Sen fanner, asked if the Mills Act would be available for
Aae this property.
Ms. Banks affirmed that it woul .
Chairman Schmidt opened the public hem
Christina Sierra, attorney for Asoerican N anal Can ComyAny. presented a
letter from Mr. John P. Totten of American App is Associiates. She stated
with Mr. T tten'srecoameMatlon thatithe prope�nty ban es gnateed asahPoint of
HPC Minutes -3- October 6, 1988
- 3�a-
Y
c:
- RESOLUTION N0.
67J
A RESOLUTION OF -THE CITY•COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of. RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE Y
THOMAS HOUSE LOCATED'AT 7980 VINEYARD AS A LANDMARK �a^
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has'held a duly
edverticed pabilc hearing to'consider'ail comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation and issued Resolution No.-88- recommending to this City council
trat said Landmark Designation,be approveif -
is
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input from
the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said'Landmark Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
HOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically
finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor
Parcel N' er - 02 -09.
BCTOM .4.9R following r 2200 of the ancho Cucamonga MunicialCode
A. Historical and cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical style.
2 The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common but is now rare.
3 The proposed landmark was connected w'th an important family.
4 The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
8 Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1 The proposed landmark in its location represents an establish
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and
city. (Ordinance 70 S9, 1979)
SECTION Iii: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19,
Sect an
,� 13
1.
iU;RtSOLUTIONf, =rtW
H =HOUSE't
August 1988Z
Page
SECTION IV: B&j',jd on th"e',substantial evideme received-and reviewed by-
this Uo—unffr—and, based, on theMPAngs'set forth - above,
HOW. THEREFORE. 'BE If- E-SOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga city CouWil
does hereby approve designation of TM,Thosas House as alandmark.:'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 19, 1988
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren N. Wasserman, City Manager
SUBJECT: NORTHEAST ETTWANDA COMKUN TT PARK PROJECT FINANCING
Review and approval of an Agreement for Legal services with Jones, Hat
6 White, to act as Bond Council and, and adoption of a Resolution Vnic
authorize and direct staff to proceed with the financing of the p
Northeast Etiwanda Community Parksite Land Acquisition.
BACKGROUND:
The City is in the process of acquiring land in the Northeast section of
Etiwanda for a community parkslte. The location under consideration 1s
generally in the proximate area of summit and East Avenue.
The total cost of the land has not been finalized through J. William Murphy
and Associates, the City's consulting appraiser, however, it is felt the cost
should not exceed $2.9 million.
The funding source for this project is the propo,ed sale of Certificates of
Participation (Bonds). The Resolution under co�isideration would allow City
funds to Initially pay for the park land area and be reimoursed through the
sale of these certificates. The City has contacted the underwriter and
obtained four scenarios which are being reviewed by staff. A recommendation
as to the term of the bonds will be furthctming after all the scenarios have
been evaluated.
The City has contacted the firm of Jones, :all, Hill 6 White, who will act as
bond counsel to the sale of the Certifi:ates.
Respectfuliv submitted,
uren . Wassernen
City Manager
LMW:cm
31,5
m
Y}
s
AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES
(Pak AcquL*Mon Project?
`
THIS AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES Is made and entered Into this
day of . 1888, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMONOA,
6;
CALIFORNIA (the 'City), and JONES HALL HILL a WHITE, A PROFESSIONAL LAW
*
CORPORATION, Sep. Francisco, California ('Attomeys').
WITNES8ETH:
'
WHEREAS, the City proposes to Mane the eoqu!shlon of land for the proposed
northeast Etawands park by entering Into such agreements as may be necessary and to
authorize the axacuticn, delivery
and sa7o Of cortifioates of participation in payments to
be made under such agreements (the 'Certificates'); and
WHEREAS, the City has detennlnoci that Attorneys J end
s
`
experienced to provide services for the financing and theexocution an delivery of the
d delive ry
Certificates; and
X
WHEREAS. the public Interest, economy and gerimal welfare will be served by this
Agreemont for Legal Services;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED, as followe:
1 Dudes of Attorneys. Attom%s shall provide legal se.ices In cann3ction with
the authorization, Issuance and consummation of the financing proceedings relating to
executlun and delivery of the Certificates. Such services shall Include the following:
_
a. Confer and consult with the officers and administrative st.ff of the City
as to matters relating to the financing pr,iceedings;
b. Attend all meetings of the City Pouncil Of the City and any
udministrame meetings at which any financing proceedings relating to tha
Certificates are to be discussed. deemed necessary by Attomeya for the props,
planning of the financing proceedings or when snecifically requested to attend;
c. Prepare any required lease agreements, trust agreements, assignment
agreements, agency agreements, amendments to existing financing documonts,
Indentures, ordinances and all resolutions, notices and legal documents necessary
for the proper conduct of the financing proceedings reiating to the execution and
delivery, of the Certificates;
d. Review all financial documents for legal sufficiency;
t
P
R
4
e. Review, without undelaking an Independent Investigation, any of ldal
°
=`
statement or oilier dscbsure documtxn prepared In connection with the fNancing
?IG
prcceadfrtga to setae ccrrectnuls of disclosure relating to the legal documenta;
f. Prapara and provide a elgnature and no- litigation certificate, an
x
arbitrage c6ldflcats and any and all other dosing documents required to
accompany delivery of the CertlACataa;
p
g. Prepere and provide a complete transcipt of the conduct of the
;.
proceedings neeewary to accompany deNery of the Certificates;
�•
h. Subject to tha completion of proceedings to the satisfaction of
Attomeyc, provide the legal opinion of Attorneys that the Interest due with respect
r�
to the Certificates 1s excludable from gross income for purposes of federal Income
taxation and that such Interest Is oxempt from Cafifomia personal income
taxation;
a
I. Subject to the completion of pros »dings to the satisfaction of
7
Attorneys, provide the legal opinion of Attorneys approving in all regards the
legality of a0 proceedings relating to the execution and delivery of the Certificates;
and
Confer and consult with City officials and agents with regard to problems
which may arise during the servicing and payment of principal and Interest due
with respect to the Certificates.
2. Compensation. For the anrvlcas set forth under Section 1, Attomays shall be
paid the percentage compensation set forth below, subject to a minimum tee of $15,1300:
a. One percent (1 %) of the principal amount of the Certificates to a
principal amount of $1,000,0(0, plus;
b. One -half percent (1/2 %) of the principal amount of the Certificates In
excess of f 1000,000, but leas than or equal to $5,000,000, plus;
c. One - quarter percent (1/4 %) of the rdndpal amount of the Certificates
In excess of $5,000,000, but less than or equal to $10.000,000, plus;
d. One - eighth percent (1/8 %) of the principal amount of the Certificates In
excess of $10.000,000, but less than or equal to $20.000,000, plus;
e One - sixteenth percent (1/16 %) of the principal amount of the
Certificates In excess of 120,000,000.
In addition, Attorneys shall be reimbursed for any costs advanced by Attorneys on
behalf of the City, Including delivery and messenger services, closing costs, duplication
costs, transcript binding costs and expenses for travel outside the State of California
any, but specifically excluding travel expenses within the State of California.
-2-
- 3/ �7
4v`
,�,. ei`y ✓: .,��:c' =rhd :!y. v;".�ti..Iw .. , =. ,sa i "w �a:r - `,Frir°_ - _�iaa x ;_
pros We of fheLYrtr AM at other avasable moneve of the City,
3 ExOaaYtMef }!'Aryisrviwa rendered in any litigation Involving the City or the
financing prxeefts ieWiig to the Certificates are excepted from the servkes to be
rendered for the above comps tton. For such service* which Attorneys are directed to
render for and on behalf of the City, oompensatlon shelf be on the basis of reasonable
fees to be agreed upon by the City and Attomeys.
4. Termination of Agreament. This Agreement for Legal Services shall be
indefrJte as to term but may. be terminated at any time by the City, with or without
cause, upon ninety, (9M days'- W ttentnotloe to Attorneys.' - In the event of such
termination, all flntshed -and unfiniefteil: documents shell, at the' optlam or the City,
become Its property and shell be delivered by Attorneys.
' IN WITNESS WHEREOF; the parties hereto have caused these presents to be
;. executed by their respective officers thereunto duty authorized as of the day and year_
first above written.
M
neu
CITY OF F.ANC' 0 CUCAMONGA,
Attest:
City Clerk
JONES HALL HILL 6 WHITE.
A Processional Law Corporation
By
an D. Quint
RESOLUTION N0. '10 3 '
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA PROVIDING THAT PAYMENTS MADE BY THE CITY IN
CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION- OF LAND RELATING TO THE
NORTHEAST ETIWANOA COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT ARE TO BE MADE IN
ANTICIPATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A PLANNED
LEASE FINANCING WITH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO BE
ACCOMPLISHED BY THE.CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIN
ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
ty' RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the
•Ci):
WHEREAS, the City is proposing to proceed With a lease financing
with certificates of participation; and
WHEREAS, in con;.ection therewith, the City proposes to finance the
acquisition of certdin land relating to the northwest Etiwaida Community Park
project (the 'Project ") and it is in the best interest of the city, is to the
Public interest and is for the public benefit that the City set forth its
expectation of reimbursement from the proceeds of such proposed financing;
'a
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows;
�Y Section 1. Any payments made by the City from its general fund or
a other available moneys in connection with the Project, prior to the
d consummation of the proposed lease financing with certificates of
participation, are intended to be made strictly in anticipation of
reimbursement therefor from the proceeds of sich financing.
Section 2. The Mayor, the City Manager and other appropriate
officials of the City are hereby authorized and directed to do any and all
things and take any and all actions which may be necessary or advisable in
accordance with this Resolution.
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect ieaediately.
~�9
'a
� G
,l
■:.
M ,
•ts.
— CITY OF RANCHO CUWA VNGA
STAFF REPORT "
rr3
Date: ootober�l9, 1988 u n
To: Mayor, Member",' -' City Council and City Manager
From: Joe Schultz, Community Servicen Manager
Subject: Appointment of Ono Council xember And Designation
Of Mayor To Serve On Task Force Tn Review Park And
Recreation Facilities
��?LTI42i:.
To appoint one City Councilmsmber and designating the Mayor for
review of existing park and recreation facilitiast assessing long
term needs for these facilities and develop a future action plan
for Providing park and recreation facilities.
unmpm ;.
The attached plan will give appropriate study to existing
facilities and give input into pro pp ;�eatod from
oeod facilities needed for
long -term facility programming. This study was re
Council Members at a recant City Council meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jo 9cl:ultz (y\
Co unity Servic0e'?Sanagar
CC: Jack Lam, Assistant City Manager
Park and Recreation Commission
JS: be
Attachment: Task Force To Review Park and Recreation Faoilities
3D0
a;
rA
:F
TASK FORf3 TO REVIEW PARK AND RECRSATIOR FACILITIES:
PURPOSEt
F,
The City Council has created a 32 member task force made up of residents, local
youth sport organization representatives, and electod and appointed City
officials to reviev existing park and recreation facilities, &*sees the long-
- tam needs for these facilities and develop a future action plan for providing
park and recreation facilities.
THE GOALS OF THE TASK POECE ARE AS FOLLOWS1
1. To inventory all existing sport uses within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
r
_ 2. To study all availability of open space and other park /recreation asmnities
vith.n park and recreation facilities.
3. To project loug -tam needs for park and recreation facilities.
4. To formulate a plan for providing adegmte perk and recreation facilities
as identified by the City a General Plan.
The Task Force consists of the following representatives appointed by the City
Council.
1 - Vineyard Little League Representative
1 - Alta Loma Little League Representative
1 - Citrus Little League Representative
1 - Deer Canyon Little League Representative
1 - Rancho Cucamonga Pony-Colt Baseball League Rt- aaentetive
1 - Rancho Cucamonga Legion Baseball League Representative
1 - ACE Youth Softball League Representative
I - Hiss Softball America Representative
1 - AYSO Region 65 Representative
1 - Inland Empire Volleyball Club Representative
1 - Rancho Cucamonga Senior Soccer League Representative
1 - Rancho Cucam,oga Adult Soccer League Representative
1 - CYSA Saccer'Sepresentativa
1 - ACE T -Ball Representative
1 - Rancho Cucamonga Pop Warner Jr. Football Representative
1 - VIP Club Representative
I - Mayor
I - City Councilmember
2 - Planning Commission Members
2 - Park and Recreation Commission Members
10 - Citic -ans Al Large Appointed by the City Council
City staff will provide support and act as liason to the task force and
committees.
4
STPAT9CTi
The Task Force will couduet• itself according to the following strategy.
1. The entire Task Force will moat for an initial organization meeting.
2. Task Ports membera will divide into the follwing committees to ezemine
specific aspects of pack and recreation facilities and amenties.
a Committee to survey and inventory existing pack and recreation
facilities.
• Committee to survey potential public and private rights -ef-wsy, and
other properties which may be developed as park and rear, itioa
facilities.
• Committee to assess the need for future facilities for adult and youth
sports.
• Committee to assess the need for other park, cultural and recreation
azentieo and facilities (not related to adult and youth sports).
• City staff will research the potential for future park acquisition and
development.
3. the entire Task Force will meet again to discuss findings of each
committee.
4. The Task Force findings will be forwarded to the Park and Recreation
Commission for review.
5. The Park and Recreation Commission will submit the Task Force findings,
along with its ow comments, to the City Council for consideration and
action.
SCNRD"Ui
October, 1988 Organize Task Force
Mid- November, 1988 Task Force Initial Meeting
November- December, 1988 Committee Meetings and Research
Mid - January, 1989 Task Force Heats to Consider Committee
Findings
January, 1989 Task Force Findings Submitted to Park and
Recreation Commission
February, 1989 Findings Submitted to City Council
L'3V
s a
0
L
TEN!Nv X
VzWs'
WAT 18 t8OPOUTION 85?
8' Propositton,:.jSS is a $75 jillion state bond issue for
library conatimwt6n and renovation.
:L18RAR1E
HXK 219 VW DOES VLOPOS171021 83.DO?
(9161 "1 3 Authoriiis grants to any city, county, city-county, or •-e
district "which, Is ouspavored to awn or maintain a local
HOMWART OMARR V�ubllc, library`.; -
Grants could be used to address the following needs:
- site acquisition.
- new building construction.
M.&W. C.441-k .,remodel existing buildings to increase energy
Sa PTA efficiency. I
Srww Km M6JdJ renovate existing buildings to most health staff
S. S� safety codes..
X".*'L.dw renovate or ' remodel existing buildings for
9. handle& pad access.
AuW
Ga, F. $a.$ * The minimum grant application would be $35,000 per project
• The grant applicant (local community) ♦aUld be required to
DMORM provide at least 35% of the project cost Thus• there would be a
CAGAMAnews state and local partnership in funding each of the approved
Irnd Ml projects
A..a... A..,I".
a Lw',,.." W. Grants could me be used for administrative costs, ongoing
operational costs, books, materials, or repayments of local loam
AFtX1U Will NOT raise taxes •
.f Mw
n.n Tn.Y..
..J C� -.= M IS PILOPOSITION 83 KICUSARY?
QW". tg—�
A..°t.t.. California Is In the midst of extraordinary population and
r j Wdi. ..d economic growth. This year alone California'• population grow by
116., Ed.t. 600.000 p4oplet Like many Important community services, libraries
A.. have best unable to keep pace with this rapid gravrh. As a result,
there sre California neighborhoods and communities that aimply do
not h&i* a local library
C.U.. 9,.,. PTA
C.W..t . T....... Other communities rely an old library structures .•some built
A—"° as far back as 1852, with many built prior to 1930. These older
facilities need to be expanded, made more accessible to the
handicapped, strengthened for earthquake safety• or remodeled to be
core efficient A recent survey conducted by the State Librarian
found that 110 of California's 169 public library systems Identified
L a need for construction or renovation funding
CAWPIGN MANAGER
185 Library Construction and Renovation Bind Act of 1988
Argument In Favor of Proposition 85 i'
California is in the midst of extraordinary popukt1 .
and economic growth. THIS YEAR ALONE, CnLIFOA•
F A'IA5 POPULATION HAS CROWN BY 6000,00 PrO.
PLE Like many important community services, libraries
have been unable to keep pan;. The results are:
a SM-NY CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES DO NOT
HAVE A LOCAL LIBRARY
a Many communities rely on old structures that need
to be expanded strengthened for earthquake safety,
made more accessible to the handicapped, or remod-
� • eled for efficiency. SONSELIBRARIESCURRENTLY
IN USE WERE BUILT AS FAR BACK AS
I632—MANY PRIOR TO 1930.
*Important library programs. LIKE NEW PRO.
CRAMS FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS ]UST
LEAr1 \7 \C TO READ, have placed added demands
on library facilities
Proposition 63 is e common sense, cwt• ffiectjve spy
i proach to address these critical problem, Your yea vote
'.§f. for Proposition 85 will NOT raise taxes.
Proposition 83 establishes a partnership of state and
local government, in which the state pays only 65% of the
v ;t
s. r
construction or renovation cost. -The local community
must cover tbra re.Tdlning 35 %. -That means a libran-
must be a priority to the loco; community before the state
will help finance It. That also means Proposition as will
actually result is, ova 9113 trillion in library construction
snA r n:.Hnn -•
Ilbrarieslare the open, community•hased, public way
we makes our lieritige, literature, knosvkdge, and skAls
available to all Californians.' Daniel Boorstin, former
Director of the Library of Congress, said:
"Libraries remalm the meccas of self-help, %here
there we no entrance examinations and no diplomas, and
Where we can enter at any age.- ' r
We need safe and efficient libraries to sane our
communities. We need Proposition WI ` ,
DARRY I E E
Sun Snow ,. and Diand
Soso& Mgfontr Lwder
IAN HADDY
Sus Sn aarq Isla Dbtrid
Snow Hisseriy leader
HELEN IL UNDSET
Isr UM4 Gil(ranne Sul, FrA
Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Proposition 8S
The proponent$ of this bond measure are telling ;as
than the truth when they say Proposition 85 will not raise
taxes They fall to note that bonds are backed by the full
faith and credit of the State of California. When the word
"state" is mentioned, tAis really means "taxpayer"
In 1919 s oters passed Proposition 4 by a 74% majority.
This measure. known as the "Cann Spending Limit,"
Imnits the annual rise in state budges. Politicians like
Seraton Keene and hladdv are Frustrated by their inab8•
Its to directls spend more of the taxpaveri money Since
bonds are exempt from the spending limits, their use has
grow n phersomenalh over the last eight years There are
532S_'.00u Ono in bonds on this ballot alone'
It s time to stop approsing even bond measure that
comes up for a mote You mats lose a certain program or
setviec, but always remember that someone must pas
And that someone B YOUI
Proposition 83 creates a dangerous precedent of a
"partnership of state and local government" Thu just
means that state officals will be interfering in local affairs
more than they do already. .
Proposition 85 Is expensive, flawed, and decepthe.
VOTE . \O on Propositicr 8S.
TED BROWN
=Qslr000, LMtn4a lady of Califerou
X't for 111 ftwarraA xa.d D d W
kl%l 1. COIAS%ORrlls'
S*w3o,o SW Casinose, LtMerrrian Pony of Cefiforn,a
Caodfdsu for 14 Cosgr josh D4fntf
SARAH E FOSTER
LlvnurLn Candidne far Suite Sewtar. 93rd D.dntt
34 .Ala rs n minted on this err tie the aounlans of the authors sad lies, ant
r�a�i� f 'eF�•���-
Tl
" Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
Argument Against Proposition 85
The State Leghlature asks you to approve STS million In
bonds to Improve public library facilities We urge you to
vote ,N'0.
Libraries are usually run by cities and cowties Since
when has the state government been responsible for the
upkeep of libraries? The state already requtrn spending
for numerous programs In Calilomb's cities and counties
This appears to be further interference In in area where
It b completely unnecessary.
In any event, this measure is unfair to most Califor•
Manx. Less than one•third of the people use library
services, yet they are subsidized by the other two-thirds
of the non•librarypatronhing publim-Poor and lower
Income residents mint pay lases for services that are used
Primarily by middle and upper•middytelus white collar
individuals.
This subsid • should end. Many libraries across the
country already charge for special services, such as loan•
ing best sellers, giving interlibrary loans, handling equip.
ment rentals, etc. Why shouldn't library patrons pay
either an annual membership fee or a bythe•book rentay
Fee for regular library services? Let shore who want a
service Pay for Ill
The Brat library in the United States %as a pprivate
subscription library founded by Benjamin Franm in
1771 \tam• communities today use the same method by
charging an annual fee and by using volunteer staff.
Others have contracted library services to private com•
Panics
If a service Is worthwhile, as libraries certainly are, it
will be Provided in the free market. Libraries receive
extensive gilts and endowments even now. Such contri•
butlons would increase if there was a lack of government
financing.
.Please remember when you cast your ballot that there
are 57,000,000 worth of bonds being proposed. This
measure by Itself may seem small, but It is part of a much
larger picture. Remember that a'bond- is defined•as
"anything that binds, fastens, or confines; imprisonment:
Y Pty " Cal fomsam will be stuck paying the bill for 70
A vote for Proposition 85 will put the state govemmenl.
Into yet another area where it doesn't belong —and sin
Put us In debt at the same time. Vote NO on Proposition
83 and vote NO on all the other bond measures on this
ballot.
TED BROMN
Cb'—m ub+larfen Pana al w(fornfa
C--440101 tit Canaraaa IDnd DWnr,
Kbt 1. COLDSWOFMIT
SaatAmt 17a Caair,rwl Libertarian Parry of celyomia
Codldai.lo• V4 CamrnA Mh DOt.4r
SARAH E FOS'Ett
ubrradaa Qmd damyar State .^.,rotor, Sri D6Mn
Rebuttal to Argument Against Proposition 65
Despite claims of opponents of Proposition 85, the State
OF California has a history of commitment to public
libraries dating back to the turn of the century. Provisions
for a statewide system of local public libraries are furaly
fix1d In stall taw, not local ordinances.
The opponents statement that band funds would be
used to run libraries which are - usual1v run by dries and
counties" is absolutely misleading. 'she only we of these
funds is for projects to build or renovate library struc.
tures Local communities would continue to retain opera
atiorwl control of libraries. and pay operational costs as
the, deem necessary
It Is appropriate to use bonds for public library facilities
became the fadhties will be available for public use
throughout the Period wben the bonds are being paid Off.
Bond financing ts also the mechanism preferred b.
private industry to fund major building projects caWar.
nia has a A.AA bond rating, and the nonpartisans Leosi..
tive Analyst has conclud, that "there Is no evidence that
Califomia f current debt burden is excessive or poses any
significant fiscal threat."
We need M have local liL�aries to se-%s our growing
communities Proposition 8.5 la the logicil. castle((eeti,e
way to build those libraries. Vote "1'Ei' on Proposthon
as State bond funds are uses to build local schools, acquire
eummunsh m
Parks, and build county jails Community seat.R Smaotr.. JnA DWHa
libraries supplement our system of free public education. TOW aRADLES
To argue that bond funding should not be avalla.,le for sfaron air al Lee A ... fn
hbrar, construction denies education the top priority RICBARD P. SIMPSON
an en it b, the State Constitution, FJteadw Sara hrdd• ,t
Cafllanw Tarp PM Ancried..
3a5
CS9 Naumann pnntrd on thb DaP ore tM gNnr u of tM authan and Iww not been th,1@4 for a nn b;any amew uMCy* 33
�
f }' 1 iii - i • Sa"ti [ t•x- _
\Angeles
V Los Count Library.
FFy
y }
7400 Ea Impei Hry� P.0, Bn 7011, Dowery, CA 90241.701;, (213) 940.8461
r
�au'n. F PMUKM McIaO"VA, Cfty
' •rp -e:µ WKrt
c
•. +r
.r
July 28, 1988
Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Lee Angeles
.t
333 Hall of Admtilstration
500 N. Temple Street
Loa Angeles, California 90012
_
Dar Supervisors:
ENDORSEMENT OF PROPOSITION SS
STATE GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND ISSUE
NOVEMBER, 1983 OEMRAL ELECTION
: (AD Districts)
This L to request that the Board of SupervliDfs formally endorse PrOposltlou 85 which
will be on the NOyembct S. 1988 General Election ballot. This measure provides for
the lsavance of $75 million in Sate Gxetal Obllgition bonds for mntchlng grans to
IOW Ubraries to: construction and expanslcn of facilities. This toad tsave will provide,
nt
:01 the ti time, Sate General Funds f'v consmetlon of total libraries. Based on
e xperlace In Federal constraction grant programs administered by the Sate Library,
we expect to qualify for oar fair share of that S75 million or $7400,000 to build facilities
to serve the 2.9 million residents of the Library District. The Sate Library will laue
65% matching gams from the proceeds of this bond over a three -yat period starting
In 1990- If the County obtains these Sate monies, the 35% local match would require
the Library Dlmlct to appropriate $4.0 million In Iocal or Federal matching funds.
The Count7's matchlag feuds could be obtained from the Library District's annual budget,
City funds, Federal community development block grants, lot.ai private fund raising,
and certificate of participation borrowing.
Current County Llbrary Needs
As a direct result of property tax limitations Imposed by Proposition 13 in 1978, the
Library District has not been able to construct additional libraties to serve the significant
growth In population since that time. Since 1980, the population served by the County
Library W grown by 414,320 from 2.5 to 2.9 million persona without adding any new,
additional library facilities. Using the generally accepted ratio of } square foot per
capita, the County Library needs to construct over 200,000 square feet of ne+n facilities
to maintain existing levels of service. The County is serving additional population equIv-
Ment to the size of the City of Long Bach without additional space. Based on estimates
Of Popufatlon growth fat communities served by the District included In the County
General Plan, we can anticipate a growth of In excess of 600,000 persons over the next
20 years.
3ab
81marable Board of Sapetvlsors
Silly 28, 1988
Papa 2
During the Period since 1980, the Public Library bas made use of available fnnding.
Leased facilities In Walnut and La Verne were replaced by newly constructed facilities
fmanxl by Federal grants and City redevelopment agency funds. Our Willowbrook
and wallan Gardens Libraries relocated Into leased space to serve better those eommunitler.
Our ,U •th Whittier Library is currently being expended using Federal grant funds.
are a" relocating our San Fernando Library W a larger leased space late this a u met.
m We
_
Thesa modest adjustments in space have not met the critical needs In the growth
especfsll,^ In the unincorporated east and north regions of the County. areas,
State-wide Needs
Tile California State Library conducted a survey of state -ate needs for specific and
Immediately required library projects. Based on that survey, cities, counties, and dletrlers
identified a critical need for 5873,076,000 in new facilities in 110 local pubes, library meet a small fract, DeeeeddIdentified by local agencies in 987. Based on our success in obtaining Federal
grata for replacement libraries In Walnut, La Verne, and for the South Whittler expansion,
we expect to be successful In competition for this limited new program for Sate fundhag
Of local library construction needs. The Federal Library Services and Construction
.Set (LSCA) currently provides only about $2.0 million for the State of California. This
modest program catoot meet the needs of the Sate with almost $l billion in Identified
MTM space requitauents, and new funding at the State level Is needed. Due to Federal
budgetary deficits, tea modest Federal LSCA Ptogram is In jeopardy of being severely
refaced or eliminated an: erospeets for an Increase In this source of funds does not
scm Hkoiy.
Sate -wlde Support for Proposition 9S (SB 181 Keene)
The proposal has been endorsed by numerous titles and counties. Other groups endorsing
this bond proposal Include the CAL -TAX, California Library Assoclatlon, and Parents
Teachers Association (PTA).
Consistent with the Board of Supervisors policy of providing adequate facilities to meet
critical needs sa areas where population growth requires new facilities, we are requesting
Board endorsement of Proposition 85.
rr18, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED THAT VODR'BOARD,
Endorse Proposition 95, the Library Construction and Renovation yond Act of
1988, on the No- .ember 8, 1988 General Election ballot.
�Very truly •y rs,' Jn/
iIsmond tit GC.e+•e7�/
Linda P. Criamond 1
County Librarian
LFC:R V H: p/34 -064 /Ex /f
a Chief Counsel
Officer ^ /J
County y Counsel ,//� . /
Auditor - Controller
�k
-��,,.tp+tRESOLUTION NO,
A Res, Z
�J.Utl0n:Oi,`the City Council'�of the city'OF
'
. California supporting . Proposit. on'. -85 "the C Library. Construction and
Renovation Bond Act of
WHEREAS the 'public.library As an' enduring and important resource to
V ol
People of all ages.,,-. races end, economic : backgrounds and needs to be
Preserved.
WHEREAS many Public library facilities',are unsafe. inaccessible and
Inadequate to provide needed -services -to their communities.
WHEREAS a state/local I'll,ancial partnership is needed since local
Public libraries do not have the funds to remedy this problem of
deteriorating and Inadequate library facilities.
WHEREAS the California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of
1988 will appear as P-OPosition ES an the statewide ballot In November 1988
and, if adopted, would create a grant program to construct and renovate
local Public libraries.
THEREFOR-.' III IT RCSOLVED, by the City Council of
that the F -uncil support Proposition 85. the California Library
Construction and renovation Bond Act of 1988, which authorizes the Issuance
of $75 million In state general obligation bonds for the purpose of
financing a library construction and renovation program.
PISSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of 1983.
//�� p f 'fj /� /� o-9' ` 4 _s•-wY
lWY VW/` ,M,
r
�i • .3
GIGNAIURE _
- i DATE A00RESS
d�«•_,---- ' -�z- -- /�o�� _-- --- - - - - --
,,,� ,� _ � . �� 635--- --• - -_
�i ;> marble
----- - -----
- --- ---- --
____ q
3{a- ffl oc b l ------ -- --- --` =!! i __ r `--77- �- - -----
L------- ------- - ----
---
--- - - - -- - -- -` - -i -
- -------------1---------------
------------
---------
x�
u -4•
DATE ADDRESS SIGNATURE
---------- — -----
e7
I
to- rca4"L lf:�S�CLmm
--------- ----------------
Awcl,
------------- -
-3Y ---
v------ ---------- T ---
------------------------------ -
'IN I � " ft""l-kc jlj,-
----- -------------------------- — -------------------
'.1 1 "7 7
" a r b4 - -11�- ,
------------------------------------------- ILI----
", 4 /;, -�V;/ f - )
/C , (424�4 g-"� 1
--- ------------------------ ----------------
:1 � 0 Nadt -
------------------ 04 ----
") j Ich av
I
6 .v
M
Al
A A�
e
°__-------
_t — —e - - - - --
to 'S
eAe
9
4*
q
------------ to
e
. � {,M .� `7 /(�J.Y�/ - %�J,� (.LC/ PVT ... !;•� ''j6F
3�a••- ;� tiYi
`f a
1 • __ tiff;
r
- DATE ADDRESS SIGNATURE
------------------ T=°------ ------ --------- ----- ----- - - - - -- c
r; ^S
-
� 141 b ZM r_m,0._evk U-- _d0. -
4�J•
- --------
- - --
- —
Iv '� 'har
10A 0 M&W
r 1o19�i?� _ 283 PMac --- -- --- - -- -- -- - ---
- -- q
JU
-------------- ----------- ---- - - - - -- Y� U
�Z
DATE ADDRES!i SIGNATURE
- - --------------
------------
qwi---
r -0 Ad — -------
-7
,7
----------------------
-Kj
a4'
----------------------- -------- �-A-n'c
---------------
--------- ------
--------------- ---------
I tie
sp
V
0
-----------
DATE
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE,•-
6,
-----------
"i LINDA VALENTI O EFEi4 +
•LI''.. 6278 MARBLE AVENUE - CI ��' 06!hc ;O CUCP. orec, .
'• ALTA LOMB, CALIF 91701 •l DfSlL;bl'.b�;�N - .n
OCT 1 l 1988`
1 Y IgIDIUI�11t 1419e
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0• ti
C/0 CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
e C/0 CITY ENGINEER
9320 BASELINE ROAD
{{ RANCHO CUCRMON6R, CALIF 91730 .:
DEAR SCOTT MURPHY,
IO FOLLOW -UP ON OUR CONVERSATION OF FRIDAY OCTOBER 7, 1998. ,
WE THE •.> DEMAND THAT DSAID CITY �IMPRUVEMENT ALONG !SAPPHIRE STREET BEEREEMOVEO.
IT IS A SAFTY HAZARD AS THE FENCE OBSTRUCTS THE VIEW OF ON- COMING
TRAFFIC. A VEHICLE MUST PROJCCT ITSELF INTO ON- COMING TRAFFIC TO SEE
ENOUGH TO NEGOTIATE A TURN, OR CROSS ONTO LVION STREET.
IT RIDE9SKATEBOA CHILDREN WILL BE PUT INTO
ALONG SAPPHIREAATP FASTLSPEEDS/.9 THEY
THE
FENCE IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR FEEI TALL AND THESE CHILDREN WILL BE
OBSCURED FROM VIEW, ESPECIALLY DURING DUSK HOURS.
ALL MOTORISTS LEAVING OUR AREA FnCE TRAFFIC THAT EXCEEDS THE SPEED
LIMIT BY A LARGE MARGIN. OBSTRUCTING OUR VIEW OF TRAFFIC PUTS ALL OF
US AT HIGH RISK OF INJURY.
WE ARE EXPECTING CITY OFFICIALS TO ACT CUICKLY BEFORE ANY OF THESE
TRAGIC POTENTIAL SITUATIONS OCCUR.
WE ARE PREPARED TO SEEK COURT ORDER TO CEASE C014STRUCTION IF
NECESSARY .�
I N�
ATTACHED IS A SIGNED PETITION OF THE RESIDENTS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOC. ,
e WE ARE PLANNING ON ATTENDING THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING, ALL OF
US
SINCERELY•,
i (`% /• /Gyp
1 "LiNOA VALENTI f
iii
y
AMENDMENT t 'ITT TO PET I,T-1 ON FOR JR LONG'SAPPHIRE'FROM ALTA"
CHURCH' BDUNDRY,'TU',*BAjTVON.
I 9 TIiE"0U5RUELh,1 NG Md10RITY . 5 WHO REQUIRE IiIAT 'iAln'
I 13
`OF-OVER.00%)� CNSENSJS OF; ,.�F E BE "RE VED NSEI�VATI E
R IDENNTS FEEL I 4T: SA 111), 4 B R I . VAIH IS 100 NARROW FOR, PEDIS7,Rl
TOs PASS'13AFELY &'EQUESTRIAN VRP1TFIC. - THERE IEI-•No PLACE FOR,,' CHI D',
ROSS
CHILDREN rl.UST'C 7,0 THE
ON A BICYCLE�To -ShM Yij7ijSS! FWYT AQRSE".' .. . 1 .a' -''N
OTHER SIDE OF-'S,',PPK,' f''j!F R1131PB'A BICYCLE OR SKATEBOAPDi'fSAPPHI E. i
CANNOT •BE-ftAFELY, 'L04pw,T)O77TRAFFIC WHICH CONTINUALLY 11;XCEED9
THE SPEEVLIMIT. �eJ 'j
REMOVAL' or SAID FENCE." 40JULD'ALLOW FNOUGH, SPACE'FOR PEDISTRI AND
-,RIDERS TO PASS EACH J'allm, F I • ' I - 1; p. ".. 1'
FA E Y
T�Ai
ALSOi,,, YCM THE OPI MI OM, G,F,ll 5 MFRS OF THIa PETITION SAID - AREA
0ANO LAND
BE CFJIFJJTED FOR SIDlrWlAVJ.Xlf SCAPING'SE;PROUIDED EY 1HE'CITY._
TREES THAT'.11WERE MOVED ),w0f-FEPL.ANTED IN-THIS WALKWAY ART_ PLANTED MUCH'
TO ';.LOSE -IyJ,E%ISTItlGl lJCK WALLS.�IN IKE VERY NEAR, FUTURE THOSE-,!,,
'X.WALLS!WILL BE ROXNED'DUE'70 TREE MDTiVAMAGE.
A41REPRES&TATIUE OFjr`HE,;zrNEi9 OF THIS PETITION IjJJILL -CLOSELY.
FOLLOW C'tT'/tC0UNC*lL fEACTION AND.RECaMMENDATIONS.
SINCERELif,'
.'n'LENTI
tV
786278A1L4E AVENUE OCTOBER S. 1988
AL•TA LOMA, CALIF 31701
s•
,Cdu>•�
ec
CITY OF RANCHD CUr4WX BA
C/D CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
C/O CITY ENGINEER
+. 9320 BASELINE PDAD
i, RANCHO CUCAMOWIA, CALIF 91730
y DEAR SCOIT M111PHY,
r
t
i1
TO FOLLOW -UP ON OUR' CONVERSATION OF FRIDAY OCTOBER 7, ISM.
WE THE RESIDENIS OF MARBLE AVENUE, AND CELESTITE AVENUE, HEREBY
DEMAND ThRI SAID CITY IMPROVEMENT ALOUD SAPPHIRE STREET BE REMOVED.
IT I9 A SPFTY HAZARD AS IHE FENCE OBSTRUCTS THE VIEW OF ON- CCMING
TRAFFIC. A VEHICLE ML= PROJECT ITSELF INTO ON- COMING TRAFFIC TO SEE
ENOUSH TO NEGOTIAIE A TU "Y, OR CROSS ONTO LEMON STREET.
IT IS OUR VIEW THAT CHILDREN WILL BE PUT INTO A SPECIAL RISK AS THEY
RIDE SKATEBOARDS, AND BICYCLES, ALONG SAPPHIRE AT FAST SPEEDS, THE
FENCE IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR FEET TALL AND THESE CHILDREN WILL BE
OBSCURED FROM VIEW, ESPECIALLY DURING DUSK HOURS.
ALL MOTORISTS LEAVING OUR AREA FACE TRAFFIC THAT EXCEEDS THE SPEED
LIMIT BY .A LARGE MARGIN. OBSTRUCTING OUR VIEW OF TRAFFIC PUTS ALL OF
US AO HIGH RISK OF INJURY.
WE ARE EXPECTING CITY OFFICIALS TO ACT QUICKLY BEFORE ANY OF THESE
TRAGIC POTENTIAL SIIUATIONS OCCUR.
WE ARE PREPARED TO SEEK COURT ORDER TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION IF
NECESSARY
ATTACHED IS A SIGNED PETITION OF THE RESIDENIS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE ARII PLAM41NO CN ATTENDING THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING, ALL OF
US
SINCER1EL� Y,n� /�� /��`��
_INOs VghV /La / /Ef( /1!TI
OCTOBER 10, low.
AMENDMENT TO PETITION roll RE110UAL OF FENCE ALONG SAPPHIRE TROM AL --W!
LOMA CHURCH BfX*MRY'TO BANYON. • "r'
r.
IT IS TH£ OVERWELMINO'VAJORITY OF'RESIDSNI9 WHO REQUIRE 'II,(AT SAID
FENCE BE REMOVED CCON5C2JATIVE EBTIJYIIE.OF,OVER�00%). MWOV•sm OF
RESIDENTS FEEL THAT,50,ID,BP,IDLE PATH IS TOO NARROW FOR,',PBDISIRIANS
TO PASS SAFELY BY EQt }'LSiRIAN:TRAFFIC.'THEREiIS'NO PLACE FDA -'A CHILD
ON A BICYCLE TO- .SAFLL'Y;:PASS- -'ANY •.HORSE:+CHILORl71'11JST CRD!19,;,TD TAE
OTHER SIDE OF SAPPHIIlE:•If RIDING A BICYCLE OR SKATEDUARO. SAPPHIRE
QNNNOT BF SAFELY CR0`8.4£D. DUL TO TRAFFIC WHICH,',CONTINUALLY EY,CE1405 ,,,
THE SPEED LIMIT, a
REMOVAL OF SAID PENCE. WOULD, ALLCW LNCAJOH SPACE FOP. PEDI'STRIMSS. AND
RIDERS TO PASS EACH OTHER SAFELY.
j ALSO. IT 19 THE OPINION OF SIGNERS OF THIS PETITION THAT SAID AREA
BE CEMENTED FOR SIDEWALK, AND LANDSCAPING BE PIIO'UI ➢ITJ BY THE CITY.
,Gy TREES IHAT WERE MOVED AND E£PLANIEDIINITHIS WALKWAY ARE PLANtED MUCH
r TO CLOSE TO EXISTING BLOCK WALLS. IN THE VERY'NEAR FUTURE THOSE'
, BLOCK WALLS WILL HE RUINED DUE TO TREE ROOT DAMAOF..
AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SIGNERS OF THIS PETITION I WILL CLOSELY
FOLLOW CITY COVNCIL REACTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ,
SINCERELY,
� �s
,
�.-� LINDA VALENTI
ORY£ AURM 9ICNATUR£
_�(-- ---
to_C- 38 63s7 N14cb1e
2 �0�8_BH G3SJ _MRY�I� 7Yaed! c. l(,�Q- �~
�.�1 11 �i•• /� Jf -
C
)ONS
T"T("
C
f
DATE
AW*FSS
S2GtATLOtE
go- 6 -c3R Gme.2
/--- �!:�� - - - -��
q-Z !r
icy —,q- 0 l
r
C4+e
it
■N
DATE AOORESI 9ICamruxE
0-q -?� bzyc%:e Jos 1,1t
lr/sg Gq'S (.2e %c /,*t
L'
el
�C� tx,
---- --- --- ------- ---- - ---- --- --- -- -- - -- - - - - -- --------- --
`ii.5y� � a ri�"�sl��'I'�!� /i7��i(�J s_• .V, ?.��. II e
DATE ADDREM SlamTURE
----------- - - ---- ------ -- ------
_ - -E='
ei t - - - -- ---+f /
t
tll
:y
DAIE
Al
v ��� ���4 non �.P •� .. _ _ � i '.L/ / i .J
c "-
r
�h."'i�����5�,�; -;x'X" ibi„� %„ �+ r >t �_. > ., r....�tr. L;• t�.,_, Y
l
° 4 Y
DATE _ -- At 9IOWTURE
e .
s -
i
Il#Wee Ohapief DtVipe
6dweef cox L eoener
W
effeef
4a
f•'
Z
0
�a
I�Iv� a�Fc 1Fa Sit
AO c l Mr view
{
1!
Pass" e is