HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/01/09 - Agenda Packet - CC/P&RC IcAA,oy
� (17Y 01 s` > RAKUjo GLXAMCCVGA
o Cy����
8 AGEN"�iv1.�11_.
Un �'1
ADJODR,7PD JOINT MABTINO
January 9, 1951 - 600 p.w.
Joint hooting with the city council
and the Park and Recreation ro Lffelon
Trl- Cammunitiaa Ccnforenco Room
10500 civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
1. Pledge of Allegiance.
2. 8011 Call,
Suquet �, Alexander , Stout
__ _ -, Williams __, Wright
1. Approval to sward and au:horito exacutlon of contract (00 91 -• *•) for
Traffic Signal and Street Improvements located at Foothill Boulevard and
Aoehoator Avenue for the amount of $4:1,914.00 (9374,467.01 plug 104
contingency) to Oliver Brothers to be funded from Systems Development Fund
Account No. 22 -4637 -8942. (py. 1)
Si .,1e�Tp ORDCA - FaRIC AI{J-FACECATION UMIUM
1, hoary __, Whitehead __, Mitchell __, Mahn
_, Punter
2 Administration of Oath of Office to Mark Whitehead and Ann D. Punter.
�}i. 'i��TNS!♦17ST1� � •• Y•i'�•�nc�JllJJd'13 . Y J
•IYd' i
I!.
City CnunOil /Park and -p-
kecrsaticn Conalsaion Agenda January 9, 1990
i• Cn\WrN1I. \T1nl� lnOif��l.�i
Shia is the tine and Place for the general Public to address the City Council
or the Park and Recroation CoYisaion. State law probibits tT_ r Couacil
or Park and Recreatlwf Coemiselom fawn addressing sal iaaua rt previously
included on the Agenda, She City Council or Park and Recrs n Caemiealna
Y; receive tntlwonl and get the setter for • subsequent Ya.�:g, ccausate
are to be limited to five minutes Per individual.
1, Debra J. Adams, City Clark of the City of Rancho csoawnga, hereby certify
that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was pouted on January 0,
1991, seventy -two hours Prior to the mating Par govar,went Code nuar at
30900 Clvio center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
.nl�f C• ,,i r _ ei�5r � .. � V
— CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA .
i
STAFF REPORT f.
DATE: January 9, 1990 ,
TO: City Council and City Manager _
FROM: Paul A. Rougeau, Acting Deputy City Engineer
i BY: Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer
SUBJECT: Award and authorization for execution of contract for
Traffic Signal and Street Improvements, located at Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, for the amount of
$411,914.00 ($374,467.01 plus 10% contingency), to be
funded from Systems Development Fund Account No.
22 -4637 -8942
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recomaended that the City Council award and authorize for exec ition
the contract for Traffic Signal and Street Improvements, locab I at
Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, to the lowest responsive bidder,
Oliver Brothers, for the amount of $374,467.01 and authorize the
Administrative Services Director to expend $411,714.00 ($374,467.01 plus
30% contingency), to be funded from Systems Development Fun.., Account No.
22- 4637 -8942
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on
Thursday, uecember 2, 1990, for the subject project. Oliver Brothers is
the apparent lowest responsive bidder, with a bid amount of $374,467.01
(see attached bid aun:nary). The Engineer's estimate was $650,000.00.
Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in
accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required
background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements
of the bid documents.
Respectfully submitted,
PAR:LRB:sd O
' • Attachment
cc: Purchasing ,
�Sr'ttM��' i. ,. ••'2 i�•rtR
��,, r%jr pnK�py�pn��^N (`r�[nF1 ?nP'r FF(ryrl n. gy ��ppnP g6ror
Yay,i X4.r�
�i \f Ov M
A��d
�o
Npy yy /Q((jjY �jy yp R�
y,o..r(�ror_r w.,OY�Fig6rn8 -N lM�1X iiJ�r,y ±� Y
� M
r. n
It
a i�� na p sg >
50
a
d
an "ar nnnnn�g„ tee, �
Isni"Ilglullffiflu II I
� Y
a
r
qtly'; pop pir�FFF rr i a
as Rp S
f
HIT
OO r tl 8�
> r
ar 9
a es
MY R.-Holl'if re Ild
iguaddlig"'d S W-10 1,
8 s8
ROOM � �Nr Yp�'�f NN N gJ Fg8N L��Jgg HHY NN p s4 i 8Ldy� �'Out
t
' •r
ra
k
;;qq J N Y cc�jl� 4
ti� «rA o ' -y NTlN �HiSSinS- �'�M6�{ »��
M r
n w nn = n
b�Y y
3888 §SSb8888 888 8k58 §B88C S
to
=yg
s88s8888'SS� 8a°8a8� 98g
w ���8sSe8 <
' sw8 ag gnpu yp_yppy 9yp-ug Ha
a�8sB8sa�I8a 11111111 RS�8��8�
0
N
a 'd
A
K�
$a
op
Y
r
x I t'AS^{iFKF rl; r {iY �`i1I FhGMPP• h h t• iO � '.i
99 - 7 a j k
M M
1�
Mil 8.11111111111111.91, i888gg8�
5 � o
A ?r �
C'TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 9, 1991 A
TO: Mayor, Hembt
Recreation e Of the City ^olllgar Park and
and city +1:�2nger
PROM: Joe Schultz _%"' Community Services Director
SUBJECT:
eernar�untyo Perko and ope of a proposed San
Pro jects anticipated to benefit pace District and the
Cucamonga. the taxpayers of Rancho
signo ilaewglalatlon passed by the State Legislature and
Doard of Supervisorsptember 1990 by the Governor allows the
Process by Placing t}�P District formation
Part. and g e measure on the ballot to establish n
required for Space District. A majority vote vculd be
would specify passage. The measure pinced before the voters
assessment amount, District boundaries end a proposed be
may fix and therafter revise the which the governing body
revenue source for the Dietricte °aaesament, to provide a
monies and user leas. The District need not of overetheaontlre
ou-ItY; included the Dlatrict boundaries, unincorporated arose
recreation district as well as any cities and park
formation which choose to be included during the
resolution. Process by city Council or Governing'
recreation districts within such eitiae and g Doard
to form the District. woAn Ad Hoc Committiet of in the election
park directors and representatives Of-7a
f the Regional managers,
theartment have been meeting regularly altoe June Parks
projects °tolbe funded the District propooal, Including ingdejoint
Peck geographic zoned withlnrthenDie apportionment SoT�hus, cities and
Park and reorantiOn districto would know precisely what the
making a dec an space
joiingrict would be and do before
amount of and leasthe which rovides for a one time, fixed
revenue which revenue, tsea with Pr°vifts an ongoing sourca of
parcels. The assessment amount+tttcan ° o ly be creation
reduced new
allminated by a subsequent ballot measure.
SBCO Open Space District
Pago 2
AtiA1,Y8 8 Projects accomp3lshed through the creation of a
Park and open Space District with a benefit cassssmont to
augment existing funding sources would increase residents'
quality of life by protecting natural open space and
providing park and recreation facilities. Not only does the
Provision attractive adequate arks, e, th °Qelsamsnitiesnalioo inareaee
property values.
The anticipated revenue batted on 33,000 parcels will generate
approximately $1,155,0001 hall going to tho County and half
to the City. Thus, the approximate $600,000 revenue to the
City annually from the District assessment will not meet all
of our acquisition, development, oparating„ and maintenance
needs. (NOTE: To put this $doo,000. into percpective , jt
can fund operations and maintenance of SO acres of park per
year or build three park restrcoms per year.) However, this
additional revenue could became part of our overall financial
strategy. Elements of a comprehensive fund!ny program
normally consist of State and raderal Grants, user and
development impact fees (Quimby), landscape and lighting
district asessaments, general obligation or revenue bonds,
and other City or District revenue sources. The assessment
C031ected tarongh the District is not envisioned to provide
funding for all our park, recreation, open space and trails
needs.
The $36.00 annual assessment per parcel cnn partially fund
County and City capital improvements as well as operations
and maintenanco (o i H). (The Countyls proposed Memorandum
of Understanding (N.o.D,) explains that only 50% of the
assessment revenue can be used for 0 i H the first five
years.) Thereafter, all revenue can be used for operations
and maintenance if you so choose.
The Proposed County Zone project list for the ;fast Valley
Includes projects positively effecting our citizen¢:
• Cucamonga- Guasti Regional Park Improvements
$25,600,000 --
o Day creek Natural Area /Chaffey Regional Park
$13,250,000 "-
7
K
W
SBCO Open space District
Page 3
It 1s staff opinion that all revenue collected iron the City
portico of the nassssment district be alioa ated to Central
t•� Park Projects, including operations and main•anance because
of our policy that construction of new local and /cr
costs. on laoilities must havu a source of reven„n to defray
E Ceate.
x.
}� The proposed span apace district takes a ma i ority vote ( §)
to pass county wide. Even if our residentbvote anainst the
measure, bct it passes county wide, we are tral: ;dad in the
special benefit assessment district. There in one other
J option that exists to supplemaaent local park pro;oots, tut
regianally, that includestA citywide bond o sure thit wound
`atte a two - thirds (2/3) vote to pass. Of course you always
have the option of no action.
92H910=3 Staff and reprarentatives from the Han
aornardlno County Regional Parke Department will attend the
Joint City council and Park ana Recreation Commission
workshop to answer any guestiono you ray have on the District
formation process. It la anticipatad this will be an action
item of the January 16, 1991 City Council Meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
�1
Jo Bch ltz, C1
Community eary c Director
JS /kla
Attachments Update Survey of Public Opinion Regarding
Formation Of Pa-k and Open Space District
col Deputy City Managers
Divislon Heads
9 01
';�sixti• ^1tli� °_,.;L ?•�'f... '��., t. ..:V(t
:.g
1t
•Y •444
J „f
y
Ar4
NOTICE OF NEETl'NG
1
&:
NOticO
Counoiloand ips City
QRecr Comaissloa
>ke and Recreation on Jan ary 9,
1991, 6:30 p.m., Tri- Ccaeunitiss
Conference Room, City Nall,
10500 CIVIC Canter Drive, Rancho
CucRmonga to consider
participation in a rpecial County benefit aeeessment district
!
i'
1
for park and open space u this would
be a ballot neasure for
the JJuune 1991 01 ction.ed,
3
fit,
1/2/91
F•
r
b:Y
h•
�Y.
i'
rr.
E
✓fix
{''�y �
�FIt r�
G �. � ,y
:1
REGIONAL PARKS DEPARTMENT SAN RERNARMO coON7r
rates• —_ •�. I uluc WORM (3R"
826 East ildrd 6trn1 8n Bttneeip• CA 824180933 • c•
1714)187.2694
December 11, 1990
•� ',`�%
TOS PARK AND OPEtl SPACE DISTRICT AD HOC COMMITTEE t(EMBERS
SUBJECT: PIMAL HM40RUDUM OF UNDERSTANDING '•
A3 discussed during the last Ad Moo meeting on Novamber :to, 1990,
attached for your review and use are the followingt
1• COPY of the final Memorandum of Understanding showing all
changes based on comments received from Ad Mon Ccmmittae
' mombere. Vertical bars on the margin identify where changes
have occurred. Maw language bag been underlined and deleted
language has been lined out.
Z• Signature ready copy of the final Memorandum of Understanding.
The Memorandum of Understandings should be used in presenting the
Park and Opon Space District concept: to yppnur city councils or
governing Ointeend to Cofine how the to establish >:heir relationsh District and the
Space District is formed. P, once the Open
Please contact me with any questions.
S!nceroly,
Q12tmn�
GERRY N COMBE
Interim Director
GH: smr
cc: Steven K. Mossorli, Director, Department of Infrastructure
Bill Revert, Consultant, Dange2aond and Associates
Attachments
C•6lIIACL C. SlprtrH 1 '•r 0` „f.
"A•.a;r+r:.nn nv,v ,u nnr ,r 111 AV O Nin • 0nH&A,1I ;10y P OWAN ThYG plu.kr '•
1. —10 a.eUrt rf•,gya0�e rnorr Vint¢;4 fawt601'binf
NENORAt -CX OF DNDWL4TANDINc
RELn,aNC TO Mm PROPOSED
SAN BIIWARDINO COUa^_'Y
PARK WO OPEN SPACE D[STRICT
This Memorandum of Understanding (harair. Iter relarred to as
"MoD ") is entered in..o on the date signed below by and between the
San Bernardino County Regional Parks Department (hereinafter
referred to as "Department ") and the
(hereinafter referred to as "Participant").
HMEREMS, Section 5506.0 of the California Public Resource
Code, as added by Chapter 1017 of the Statues of 1990, effective
January 1, 1991, authorizes the formation of a Park and Open Space
District in San Bernardino County; and
WIMREAS, such proposed Park and open Space District woulc be
formed for the general purpose of acquiring, pressrvinq,
protecting, develominq, operating and maintaining open space, I
parks, recreation facilities and habitat conservation areas, as
well as hiking, bicycle and equestrian trailat and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto expect that the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, as %)�xxrized in
Public Resources code Section 5506.6, will initiate procee.lings to
establish a San Bernardino County Park and open Space District
!G
I
(hereinafter referred to as +District") and call an election to
determine whether the proposed District should be established and
whether a specie! -�.nsfit assessment should be levled on real
property within the proposed Distrlrf.i rnd
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Rsecurces Code Section 5506. 8, it
15 also expected that Participant will, by resolution of its
governing body, request to be included within the proposed District
for open space purposes! and
WHEREAS, the Department is administering the organization of
the district! and
WHEREAS, Participant and D,epartmant wish to set forth in this
MOII their intent and understanding of the dasirad relationship
between the District and Participant in the event the District is
formed, while racognlzing that the District cannot enter into or be
bound by agreemsisto entered into prior to its establishment, AW
Sher recoani -ins hat his MOII �s a forma ivi documv t that is
sublect to final annrevoi by District (on a--fov^d) an
P.9rtlPlmt
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
i
1. Revenue generatal within the Participant's boundaries shall be
s- divided 30t to the Participant and 50t to, the District.
More tow partic�pente' i +�nt..�� + a rise ovarian
(i.e a nark and recreation die ri t whose boundaries incl+de
an incorporated city no well as unincOrp2rated lend). revenue
collected by the District Mm parcels within the city shalt
be disbursed accordino to tlr apps iotmen scree for
that gone, entirely to the citt. Such amounts shall be
determined after deducting the costs identified in paragraph
9. Participant's chars ie intended for use under the sole
control of Participant for park end open space purposes as
defined in Division 3, Chapter 3, Article 3 of the Public
Resources Code and in accordance with the terms of this HOD.
2. The Distriet'a share of revenues generated in the
Participant's Zone shall bo expended within that zone. A zo -jo
is a geographic .mbdivision of the District established for
administrative purposes. It In .anticipated that the
District's zones shall substantially correspotn' to the
Planning districts identified in the Set. Bernardino County
Regional. Parks Department Strategic Hasten plag., -rated Oct' ;nor
31, 1988.
3. During the first five years following the establishment or the
District, no more than 50t of the Participant's cvxmlative
I M
J
TIM
share for that five year period, and no more than 504 of
District's 9ssulatiw share for that five veer period, xsy be !
used for operations and maintenance of projects authorized and
funded after the date of establishment of the District. A
project is definod as land acquisition, capital improvement,
rehabilitation, programs) for perk and open space purposes,
and includes planning, such as master plans, for such
projects. operations and maintenance costs include salaries,
benefits, materials, services, supplies, equipment, and
administrative overhead associated with the daily operation of
the project. At no time may revenues de -lved from the benefit
assessment be used for operation and maintenance for projects
authorized and funded prior to the establishment of the
District.
4. ?,oth the Participant and the District ehail make a good faith
effort to maintain the existing level of fundin3 for parks,
trails, recreation and open space purposes.
5. it is the inLont of both the Participant and the District that
in the event of annexation of unincorporated territory within
the District by the Participant, the same share of revenus
from the annexed area comnitted to the funding of District
projects prior to annexation shall continue to be casaittel to
those projects until indebtadness incurred by the District for
said projects is retired. When this indebtedness is retired,
4
Iq
I
the apportionment formula then in effect with the participant
shall be in affect in the annexed area. Lt is further the
intent of both the participant and the District that should
the Participant annex territory that encompasses a park, trail
or open space improvement planned by the District, assessment
funds accumulated for the planned improvement will be
transferred to the Participant if the District slacte not to
proceed with the project. The aforesaid notwithstanding,
final daterainaticn regarding the status and apportionment of
revenues generated within the annexed area shall be determined
by the Local Agency Formation Commisvion (LAFco) in
conjunction with its approval of the proposed annexation.
LAFCO's determination shall be binding on both the District
and the Participant.
5• Both the District ail& the participant shall bs bound, upon
detachment from the District by the Participant, by the final
determination of LATCO regarding the amount of revenue to
continua to be committed to debt retirement by the Particip -,It
for debts incurred by the District.
7. Tne District shall prepare or causa to be prepared an ennual
audit of revenues and expenditures by the District and Callver
a copy to the Participant. The Participant shall conc;•ict an
equivalent annual audit regarding its expenditure of revenues
derived from the District and deliver a copy to the District.
u
1
Each entity shall bear the cost for preperation and
distribution of its audit from its share of the District
revenues.
8. The District and the Participant shall each prepare a multi-
year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the acquisition and
development of parks, recreational facilities, trails and open
space areas within two years of establishment of the District
and shall periodically revise and update said plan. The CIP
will include project titles, brief project descriptions and
project cost estimates.
9. The Participant's share of the revenues collected within its
boundaries shall be disbursed to the Participant within thirty
(30) days after the revenues are disbursed to the District by
the Auditor /Controller- Racordarss Office (A/C -RO). The AC-
Ross costs associated with the collection and disbursement of
revenues, including the necessary Cpdating of information
regarding the number and status of parcels within the
District, shall be deducted from all revenues prior to
division of the revenues between the Participant and the
District. The amount deducted for the District's
adminiatrative coats associated with collection and
di ,ibursement of revenues (but not including the A/C -Rots
costs) shall be limitod to a saz?mum of one and one -half
percent (1.5t) of the total revenue generated by the benefit
s
i
{- paih.- .�• .• -
if.,
a' _ -
.w
assessment.
B
M e
10. No obligation or other indebtedness shall be incurred by the
District for any project within tho Participant's boundaries
until the substance of this Y.OU is approved and executed by
the Participant and the District.
11. It is the intent of the parties to this MOD that it's
substance shall be submitted to the Governing Board of the
District, once established, for approval in the form of a
binding agreement between the District and the Participant.
The parties recognize that the substance of this MOU in not
binding unless and until such an agreement is approved and
executed by the Participant and the District.
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
REGIONAL PARRS DEPARTMENT PARTICIPANT
Interim Director '
K
/7
.i
NENORANDW; OF UNDERSTANDING
RELATING TO THE MPOSED
SAN BE1;ARDIN0 COUNTY
PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
•!;
This Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter referred to as
"MOU ") is entered into on the date signed below by and between the
71
San Bernardino County Regional Parks Departmunt (hereinafter
referred to 00 "Department") aW4 the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(hereinafter referred to as "Participant*).
��
Bd�II`LLH
WHEREAS, Section 506.8 of the California Public Resource
code, as added by Chapter 1017 of the Statues of 1990, effective
January 1, 1991, authorizes the formation of a Park and Open Saco
District in San Bernardino Countyl and
WHEREAS, such proposed Perk and Open space District would be
formed for the general purpose of acquiring, preserving,
protecting, developing, operating and maintaining open space,
parka, recreation facilities and habitat conservation areas, as
well as hiking, bicycle and equestrian trails; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto expect that the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, as authorized in
Public Resources code Section 5506.8, will initiate proceedings to
establish a San Bernardino County Park, and Open Space District
(hereinafter referred to as "District ") and call an election to
determine whether the proposed District should be astablished and
whether a apeicial benefit aspesament ahould be levied on real
property within the proposed District; and
WHEREAS, puramanz to Public Resources Code Section 5506.8, it
is also expected that Participant will, by resolution of its
}
governing body, request to be included within the proposed District
for open space purposeal and
WHEREAS, the Department is administering the organization of
the District; and
WHEREAS, Participant and Department wish to set forth in this
MOU their intent and understanding of the desired relationship
between the District and Participant in the event the District is
formed, while recognizing that the District cannot enter into or be
bound by agreements entered into prior to its establishuent, and
further recognizing that this MOD is n formative document that is
subject to final approval by District (once formed) and
Participant.
,
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows;
`
L
1. Revenue generated within the Participant's boundaries shall be
divided 50% to the Participant and Sot to the District.
[Where tow Participants' jurlsdictloncl boundaries ovarlap
(S.e, a park and recreation distr].ct whose boundaries include
an incorporated city as well as uninzoxpc_,xted land,, rovonue
collected by the District from parcels ,.ithin the city shall
be disbursed, according to the apportionment agroud upon for
that zone, entirely to the city]. Such amounts abnll be
determined after deducting the costs identified in paragraph
9. Participant's share in intended for use under the sole
control of Participant for park and upon apace purposes as
defined in Division 5, Mapter 3, Article 3 of the Public
Resources code and in accordance with the terms of this MOD.
2. The District's share of revenues generated in the
Participant's Zone shall be expanded within that sons. A zone
is a geograpblc subdivision of the District established for
administrative purposes. It is anticipated that the
District's zones shall substantially correspond to the
planning districts identified in the San Bernardino County
Regional Parks Department strategic master Plan, Hated October
31, 1988. ,
3. During :be first five years Sollowitig the establishment of the
District, no more than Sot of the Participant's .:emulative
share for that five year period, and no more than sot of
District'n cumulative Ohara for that five year period, may be
used for operations and maintenance of projects authorized and
fwidod after the date of.eatablishment of the District. A
project is defined as land acquisition, capital improvement,
rehabilitation, programs, for park and open space purposes,
and includes planning, ouch as master plans, for such
projects. Operations and maintenance costs include salaries,
benefit#, materials, services, supplies, equipment, and
administrative overhead asoociated with the daily operation of
the project. At no time may revenues derived from the barer it
assessment be used for operation and maintenance f,r projects
authorized and fundad prior to the establishme:* of the
District.
4. Both the Participant and the D!ztrict shall make a good faith
effort to maintain the existing level of funding for parks,
trails, recreation and open space purposes. - -
5. it is the intent of both the Participant and the District that
in the event of annexation of unincorporated territory within
the District by the Participant, the same share of revenue
from the annaxed area committed to the funding of District
projects prior to annexation shall continue to be committed to
those projects until indebtedness incurred by the District for
said projects is retired. When this indebtodnoon is retired,
i
the apportiormant formula then in affect with the Participant
+;
shall be in effect in the annexed area. It in further the
intent of both the Participant and the District that should
the Participant annex territory that enCompaases a park, trail
or open spree improvement planned by the District, assessment
funds accumulated for the planned improvement will bo
transferred to the Participant if the District elects not to
proceed with the project. The aforesaid notwithstanding,
final datoraination regarding the status and appertionment of
revenues genorated within the annexed area shall to dotermine6
by the Local Agency Formation Commission (r yco) in
conjunction with its approval of the proposed annexation.
LhFCO'■ determination sha31 ba binding on both the Distrim6
and the Participant.
6. Both the District and the Participant shall be bound, upon
detachment from the District by the Participant, by the final
determination of lArCO regarding the amount of revenue to
continue to be committed to debt retirement by the Partioipant
for debts incurred by tho District.
7. The District shall prepare or cause to be prepared an annual
audit of revenues and expenditures by the Distric+r!e �*.aiivsr
a copy to the Participant. The Participant shall conduct an
equivalent annual audit regarding its expenditure of rovenues
derived from the Distri•t and deliver a cozy to the District.
Each entity e'.tall bear the coat for prapa.ati<et and
distribution of its audit from its share of tho District
revenues.
e. The District and the Participant shall each prepare a aulti-
year Capital Improvamant Plan +CIP) for the acquisition and
development of parks, recreational facilities, trails and open
space areas vith:n two yoars of establishment of the District
and shall periodically roviso and update naid plan. The CIP
will include project titles, brief project descriptions and
project coat estimates.
Tha Participant's share of tba revenues collected within ice
boundaries shall be disburerd to f' -. Pereicipant within thirty
(30) days after the revenues arm W/bVrswd to the District by
tho Auditor /Controllsr- Rscoca, -1,d office (H/C -3Z0). The AC-
RO's costs asucciated witF the co3 action and disbxasmant of
ravanues, including V *,, seem-,try ipdattng of Information
regarding the amber and statue of parcels rithin the
District, shall be deducted from al.. revenues prior to
division of the revonuas betwera the Participant and the
District. The amount deducted for the District's
administrative coats associat6l with Collection and
disbursement of rovenues (but rot including the A/C -RO's
costs) shall be limited to a maximum of one and one -half
percent (1.5t) of the total revenue generated by the benefit
d 0
i• �
xi
�4
e
V
d
M':
....c :.�- -r •.:7 _ .nr�ra �� t: fir; _ ��a 'Fr, r�
4 iwcY,'r.
assessment-
10. No obligation or othe,ct� thin the Phartialpimt''incurred oundaries
District for mny proj
until the substance of this NOU is aPProv d.'Snd executed by'
the Participant and the District. = ,
11. It is tha intent Of the Parties to this N0U that it!e *.
substance shall be submitted to the GWJrning Dourd of the
District, once established, for approval in, the form` of a
binding agreement between the District and the participant-
leg of The parties recaidinntilat thoen�agreuant iciapproved,-&114
binding
executed by she Participant and the District.
SAN jjMmNRDniD COUNT:
REGIONAL PARKS DEPARTlD3*T
Interim Diroctor
E
PARTICIPANT
+s
BERNARD WALP & MICHAL MOORE
4aauc OFNCN REXAACH a ICONOMC AA-IM
400 MOtr1OOMERY STREET. SUITE3m
SAN FRANCISCO. CAUFORNIA 941041-1211
mfFNCtb
(4I5) a94)me
FAC5a41E
(415) 931-IM
MEMORANDUM
18 December 1930
T7. Gerry Newcombe
San Bernardino County Regional Packs District
Steve Messerti
San Bernardinu County Department of Infrasiructure
Ad Hoc Committee Relating to Formation of Park b. Open Space District
FROM: Bernie Walla
SUBJECT', Update Surrey of Public Opinion
Regarding F.umation of Park i Open Space District
Attached is a summary of observations from the survey Completed test week. Is objective was
an update of observations of public opinion made in July 1990. Since the July 1990 march -
- which indicated a willingness to form a district and Incur a parcel tax -- Kuwait Invaded Iraq,
the national economy began to weaken, and California voters rejected a long list of spending
measures on the November statewide ballot. Some observers were startled by the election results.
Might the world developments of late 1990 have rendered the July march out of date? The data
below would suggest little change in public sentiment, if any. We believe the most important
attractions that a potential district has for San Bernardino County residents persist.
The survey involved Interviews of 606 randomly selected active voters throughout the currently
contemplated nbtrict bouadaries.
The confidence interval Vmatgin of error') for obsenxtions from a sample of 606 is :4.0
percentage points. However, two versions of this survey questionnaire were employed, for
purposes of exploring reactions to two different annual utation rates (S29 and $36). The
confidence interval for each subset of 303 respondents Is 26.6 percentage points.
This poll is an indication of voter dlsposlGon to support the formation and funding of a district
for certain purposes, provided the right information is put loco their hands, and provided sty
rnisinformatios is effectively countered. Actual voter support for a measure of this type will
depend on th t Competence of an election campaign yet to be waged.
Now One Important scmp3e characteristic distinguishes this study from the July research. Fret,
while the tatter drew its sa.nple from the current list of all registered voters, the December
research sampled only voters who had voted in at least one of the last two County elections
(November 1987 or November 1989). Thb modification was made In order to ensure that
our opinions were being gathered from the set of most active voters, those most likely to
participate in an election on a local issue such at contemplated here.
rI
t
Sae Banerllse Caesty RAbul 7aska Frpuerecks
D"ember 1910 YIA ce*arlaon, w.«. aaoalbta, to My 1"a raaaonh
Bernard Wale a bUe4a1 Mn..a IS D9 RI
P.
1. Introduction
Respoadeat's reader.
MALL - - - - -- 49t
FEHALE - - -- 51%
Hello, my name is _ and Ira calling
for American opinion Research.
4 i .
Kay I spear. to , please?
We are working on a brief PUBLIC oPIitION POLL, to stud yy some
factors about the quality of life for people who live in Oda
Bernardino County. We aze not selling anythiny, I will not ask
you for a contribution,'and your responses are confidential. Do
you have several minutes for me to ask your opinions on some
local issues?
2. Aided recall
This survey is very short -- it bee to do with parks, recreation,
and open space.
First, Ind like to ok whether you have heard any discussion
recently, about possibly creating a County Park and Open Space
DSetrlctl this agency would PURCHASE LAND to praeerve as open
op co, and It would DEP310P PARRS AND TRAILS where they are
needed, and it would PROTECT WILD" .772 HABITATS whore they are
endangered.
Dc you recall hearing anything recently, about possibly creating
this Park and Open Space District?
Julv Der,_
YES, RECALL - - - - -- 16% 76t
NO, DON'T RECALL - 03t 734
Q3
M
1! '3M
re+
3
i�
P,rY
ISaa
1rnaNlw Ceaaty RMtow Faris
iii"AZF'in�f
Drrrmlar l"n - F
7
2wn4nr�rlwe, Ywr au1M�, h July 1110
3. 1st beibt
•'�
If there
creating aedistrictelike thatain
SanlDerrardino County7AGAINST
Collapsad:
FOR (da1!initely) --�__ 29%
For (probably) - Ent 57t
_- 23%
dk/na /neutral - 324 27% :2=
Tgalnst (probably) - -- 6%
AGAINST (detinitely) -- 6t 7t 12-2
And would you vote FOR or AGAINST D= c&Rbar
creating such a district it you =Up L 536:
knew it would coat each prorarty
FOR --- .. -__ -_
owner 00 dollars a year to Pay for AGAINST - -- ---- 23% _._
64•
2
2611
dk/nn - -.. 28% - -- 2811
re+
3
i�
Id _
tY tk^
iii"AZF'in�f
I
9
4
Sae Beroaralae County taglual Parke
Ftsgwacks
- ''£
December 1990
Z Mad Wala k Mleld Maur:
With co: tent. ✓w o pnelble, to Ault' 19e resew►
fe_aD90[I _ __ "T. ],
• !
4. How Nis Is chansh"
I'm going to read you a list
of several ASPECTS
of life in Han
Bernardino County. As I read
arch item on my list, please tall
me whether you consider that ASPLCT
of lifo in O•;n Bernardino
.
county to be BETTER or MORSE than 5
years ago.
Here's the first ones
( PR0MP't: 1, necatery:
"
•Cwr9u.d to a yeti bee.
Y b~or .me
ne.denr J
s ayo y.a
/ ROTATE /
BE
the natal
WORSE 4tl.-ia
• Traffic congestion
24
0t
04
31
sat 14 July
944 3t Dec.
• The crime situation
44
14
151
94
754 7% July
a44 ,% Doo.
Availability of
104
174
644 94 July
c
open space landr
33
201
624 151 Dec.
Park and outdoor
364
354
224 71 July
m
recrection opportunities
224
334
254 191 Dec.
• The Inland Empire economy
232
174
404 204 Dec.
• The quality of the air
64
214
154
1"
754 It July
bat 44 Dec.
Sax BersardtaoCounty Rest"" Parke
Frequandes
D►Ntoker 1"i Yl th cmlYrleme, %ere possible, to July 1910 Hearth
11tno.d Wats Mlekol Moon ISBMOEI
��i
5. W11mgness to pay
Its going to road you some additional
county carvicas
that gyylp
bscor^ tvailablo if voters ware to approve a :ax increase -- a
year.; assessment of 30 gollare per San Bernardino County
household. As I read eecu one, pleawe tell we whether you think
it would be yob this additional tax.
( twifff, If
nrrararv:
•4 -ha Worth Ire s"dwel
lIorets the first ones
NORTH
NOT WORTH
THE ADDITIONAL
THP. ADDITIONAL
( ROTAr J — io0.00 TAY
X30.00 TAX
dt• /na
a Increase the level 73%
22t
5% July
of law enforcement 74%
22t
4% Doc.
n Protect wildlife habitats 65%
271
at Daly
a Increaecd services for 79t
is*
E} July
senior citizen programs 674,
244
93 Dec.
a Buying land to 63%
28!
10! July
preserve open space 61t
:51
14% Doc.
Development of 714
23!
6% July
-• -Id transit services 67t
244
91 Dec.
Develop more plat.,'; 4'1%
• for camping, fishing
and water eporte C
344
15t DscY
• Trails for biking, 62%
3.}
.1 J>vy
biking and riding 571
2nt
13% Doc.
• more neighborhood 744
21!
5t Jul Y
athletic fields,
slt
:0}
9t Doc.
parks and playgroun3o
1
No-
M
L
&. Batttatdl.o co■atr Repo ■el Puw Fr�quencizs
December 1990 Ylta cteperlsaw, Men paelble, to lair 1990 research
9era.rd W Q M1 rha'7 Mear (.SBD90E1
6. Open -ended probes
°I This past June, California voters said YES to a number of
statewide epsnding measures and tax incr•a.uees. That was Jung.
But 7.aST MONTH, in November, voters said NO to nearly ovary
statewide spending measure that was on the ballot. Do M have
any ideas or opinion as to what might be the Xitson voters'
fealingo yifnnaed to much in just 5 months? IVerbotlmresponsell
Dec.
Antigovernmunt /- politician / Enoughl ----- - - - - -- 30
Bad economy / Ifiddla East ---------------- - - - - -- 21%
Long, confusing ballot ------------------- - - - - -- 17%
Can't afford ----- "-- ------ --'-- ----- ----- - - - - -- at
Miscellaneous------------- --------------- - ----- 7%
Don't know / No answer ------------------- - - - - -- 13t
Now even though California voters defeated every statewide
spending measure last month, at the %axe time people in many
communities around California voted IN FAVOR cf spending more
money for parks and open space. what would you say was the
reason voters were willing to be taxed for more parks and open
space, but not for no many other things? /Verbatim respow. -sl
PTTA
Alternatives to growth /cr.awding -- - - - - -- 15%
Poople want itt it's needed ------ - - - - -- 13%
Local /tangible /direct issuo /benefit - - -- lit
Good environmental cause --------- - - - - -- st
Children/family life ------------- - - - - -- 73
Quality of life ------------------ - - - - -- St
Miscellaneous-------------------- - - - - -- lit
Don't know / No answer ----------- - - - - -- 314
Had there been a local measure on last month's ballot to provide
funds for parka and open space in San Bernardino County, do you
think it would have pdssed, or not?
YES, would have passed - -- 17%
NO, wouldn't have passed - 50e.
dk/na -- - - - - -- 33t .
J-7 �!
Sea aers9rdlact County Rytosd Forks Frequencies
December 1990 etth "Werlearr, unre pp.atble, to July 1970 nseerah
Berna[9�WxfjLa 10;b.1 Monte fcBD90H! ��
7. AFpccts of the ballot proposition
7 /ins that there is an eleotion today, and that you will vote
on a proposititn to establish a County district that would
provide recreation and parka facilities, And purchase land to
preserve as open space.
L'd like to gat your opinions about several aspecta of this
propasitions g2M, W, or no Minion. Here's the first ones
/ ROTATE J f PROMPT If necessary: •rrauw this t» a
GOOD ADPCCT or a BAD Aspz= at w. propoaumrl
The county would create a parcel tax on all property in the
• district -- about o0 dollars per lot per year.
July December
530 122L 536:
GOOD aspect - - - - - -- 51% 38% 39t
' BAD aspect -- - - - - -- 30 40% 393
neutral /dk /na -- 14% 213 22%
Property owners who I= tha new 00- dollar annual tax will be
• allowed 00 dollars of credit toward county park admission fees.
July December
$30/ $29/ $36/
8701 915: 9181
GOOD aspect - - - - - -- 72% 63% 56%
BAD aspect -- - - - - -- 191 19% 25%
neutral /dk /na -- 9% 17t 19t
About half the money for this now district would be used for
local parka and community facilities, and the money raised from
• each specific zone within the district will be spent In that same
zone.
,2H1Y Dec.
GOOD aspect - - - - - -- 72% 68%
BAD aspect -- - - - - -- 19% 15:
neutral /dk/na -- 9t 17%
Some of the wand to be purchased will be used
to help complete r: continuous trail for eom..r.ce...... srx
• hikers, bicycles and horses, to connect the W ifmt ""' .. .In
mountainn with the Pacific Ocean. rn r.t,mtn. 231
I" S's tersardlee Cowty Rezlosel Puke
Fmquanck i
December 39190 alle tegrlwe, Jun PUNINe, to luty 1916 nwrch
jjfrurd Wele a Mlebal Mmre Keneevt
Aspects of the Ballot Proposition (continued)
The money for the now district will be spent
on specific projects clearly identified to
Lm uPW ....... 6"
X1 the voters when they voted on whether or not
to crest2 the district.
em reset ........ 11x
wtrallckfm ••
2n
Some of the money for this [lev district would
- a be spent to protect wildlife habitats and
o066 aewet ...... ass
open spaces in the zones where the money is
w ..wet •• •16S
colleoted.
nulnvR/w 1II%
Some of the money fpr the new district vil' am Sweet •6:e
• be used to develop new regional parks, and am ..wet ••.. ••• 15%
improve existing ones, rwtnl/avn •• In
Real eotate developera will be charged extra Seas to buy land for
• new county parks, open space and trails.
MY Qtr,
nice ewect ....... 6n sn
e66 sweet ......•• 21% 17%
nests! /m/. 12% 3A
lz�o
Sae Benalrlleo Coolly Mealoaal Tartu rmquencks
December 1990 With comerleono, Jars lnaalble, to July 1110 reward
BSmrd Wda ! Mlebet hl » ISUTWOE7 !, a
6. Pokmks
Nov here are some stataaents that various people have made
regarding recreation and open space in Ban Bernardino County. As
I read each one, please tell so whether you AGREZ or DISAGREE
with each statement. If you have no opinion, that's okay too.
Norm's the first chat
( ROTATE (
Deering these tittles of tight money and
a budget deficits, there is a dangerous
tendency to cut Too MUCH out of parks
and open space spending.
(Paoxrr m nnesJary:
•Roa1d Y. AeREE or
DecAGRU ,dth thou•(
Nty ow,
W21 .................. Llx 60%
aartnl /dr/ro ......•••••• 20% 711
clulau ............• ... lox 19%
Taxes are high anough -- and with tho
budget deficit, and recent tax hikes
a by Congress and the State ,uly orr.
Legislature, I oppose any new taxes KQ7 .. ................ GZx 41%
for parks and open space in San aertral /*tm ••••• 11x lox
Bernardino county, 011ACe7e ......• •••••• atx 4=
Local government is just looking for
a another way to get more money oven
though they cannot properly manage
the millions of dollars they already
collect each year.
Unless San Bernardino takes steps NOW
a to preserve open space, tbo
opportunity to acquire it will
disappear and we'll become another
L.A.
3D
.................... 9a
aw.tral /re/ra ....... •• zit
01rJ12[E ............••• .... 21%
July Ox.
Ulit ............••• rtx nt
RMr.l /dk/M .......... A 13%
DISAGIR •• ......• ••••• 11% 1K
t
w.
San tareamso Coaetr Roslosa larks Frequencies
Detambor 1990 Ylta caporleer, wn p"Obto, to Jutr 1990 raorrd
3araard Wale ! MIebJ Morn ICBD90E1 �. �
9. 2nd ballot
Now that we have been discussing these issues a bit, I'd like to
ask a 2nd times Imagine there is a local ballot Proposition, to
create a San Bernardino Park and Open Space District. It would
preserve open space, develop parks, and protect wildlife
habitats, and it would cost each property owner a parcel
aaeessment or 00 dollars par year.
Ir that election were today, do you think you would vote FOR or
AGAINST the proposition?
July July July Dec. Dec.
329 /veer 333 /vosr 937 /year 124/vcar 936 /veer
VOTE FOR - - - - - -- 62% 66% 644 47% 48%
VOTE AGAINST - -- 204 20% 20! 241; 24%
dk/na - - - -- 18% let 184; 28% 28%
Reasons for voting YES
It's needed / good cause / worth it - - -- 38%
Antidote to crowding /growth ------ - - - - -- 284
Environmental /preservation concerns - - -- 13%
Family /children /quality lire ----- - - - - -- lot
Miscellaneous / Dcn't know ------ - - - - -- 10!
100% 47% or all
respondents
Reasons for voting NO
Can't/won't pay more taxes ------- - - - - -- 53%
Antigovernment /- politician ------ - - ----- 20%
Enough open apace already -------- - - - - -- 9%
There ere higher priorities ------ - - - - -- 6%
Miscellaneous / Don't know -------- -- ---- 11!
100% - 24% zf all
respondents
1L. Demographics
And now ve finish with several questions for statistical
purposes. . . July pfig
First, are there children YES - - - - - -- 44% 36%
under 18 in your home? NO -- - - - - -- 55% 641 .
31
Iii ,M_
c
t
r
See venemee Cwatr iestwat rub Fnequencks
D"tmtwr 1990 With crpriun, Mtn pwtl►lt, to July 1900 ro""A
lknerd Wele i Mklul Moen 1SBDOOP1 P. 10
Do you OWN or RXWT the home Where 0"11 ------ - ------ 75% 90%
you currently live? RENT ------ - - - - -- 22% at
That's all the questions I have. My supervisor MIGHT he calling
just to verily that w did reach you. May I have your first nnze
or your initials?
rtt9mtltnth new er Mitlab
CONF/RAf TELEPHONE NUMBER ar1S THANK RESPONDENT
Respondent's telephone number.
f nearest hmv f
9 am ---- 3%
10 am -- -- 124
11 am - --- lot
Noon - - - -- 124
1 Pa - - -- 74
2 pm - - -- 94
Sample sheet rte.:
3 pm - -- 54
a pm --- Ot
5 pm - -- 6t
6 pa -- if t
7 pm - 94
8 pm - ^- 10%
9 Pm - -- 34
Dare of lmerrlew. Friday, December 7 ----- - - - -•• 214
Saturday, December 9 -- - - - - -- 384
Sunday, December 9 ---- - - - --- 204
Monday, December 10 -- - - - - -- 21%
Party R®cistrat',SD
i
3vl
duly
Democrat - 424
COP - 68t
Other - 9t
Dac.
alt
Sit
at
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 9, 1991
TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council, Park and
Recreation commiaoion and city Manager
PROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Servicos Director
SUBJECT: m2nRUL2=
RECOMMffi;Dum
1) Consideret! ^n to accept the Central Park design and
conceptual building spaces planning of central Park. projects;
2) Consideratioz to authorize the design team consultants to
complete and slabmit Rancho Cucamorga'e library grant
CaPPlicatiO" as
3) consideration tionto Ugthorize additional funds to g
amand contract of RJM Design Group for completion of
schematic design of Central Park facil.(ties in the amount of
W5,000 to be funded from account 13 -50200 RDA.
.. h:5::••LR.
Staff w!11 have mcterial to your home prior to the joint
meeting dotailina time lines and action items at thn various
meetings that started November 1989 and concluded March /April
1990.
Staff and the design team consultants will give a verbal
report aummarizing the meetings on each Ce.atral Park
facility, which includes:
^ Recreation buildings including the community center,
gymnasium, tonnis facility and swimming pool(s).
• Cultural arts
• Performing arts
• Library
1,
L•
ayi
ski
y,4•
CENTRAL PARR
January 9, 1991
Page 2
The teak of each person,
eta!!, whether it be the design team,
pear expertise and community members, was to envision
facilities for the physical, cultural, social and educational
programming for a city build -out population of 180,000 -
200,000 people. Research wan conducted by Community Services
Staff Oh Tutura trends in recreation programming that enabled
the group to brainstorm the demands of a future older mature
community i.e., senior day care facilities are designed in
tha community center.
In March /April 1990 the various groups concluded their task
Of what programming dements nhould be planned for within
each facility. Shortly thereafter, the design team and staff
wore agendized on the Planning Commission calendar to achieve
an architectural vocabulary and address their concerns
relative to architectural character of the cultural center
(formally known as the Omni Center portion of Central Park.
In addition, the Park and Recreation commission was updated
monthly on progroea development of Central Park becauoe of
their fiduciary duty to oversee rapid design development of
this 100 acre sits that was driven by a library grant
application deadline of June 1990, later extended to 1991.
All efforts to quickly achieve a consensus of architectural
style was motivated by the library grant application
deadline.
In December 1990, the Planning Commission agreed on the
architectural character style that will now allow the library
grant to be submitted and drive the architectural design
character of all facilities within the cultural portion of
Central Park. The model of Central Park will be displayed
Wednesday evening.
I! City Council approves the building design as presented
Wednesday evening; than as a follow up to the joint meeting
of the City Council and the Park and Recreation Commission on
October 24, 1990, staff has ")reparad a conceptual schedule of
inform Rancho
Cucamonga about �the 9Central Park b Project and ;then Library
facility. In connection with this, Staff also suggests that
a Community Task Force be created to gain a bx.ad based
r servce needs for Rdncho that could ibe i eluded as pa ti of the Proposed Library Hooter Plan.
_S�
CENTRAL PARR
January 9, 1991
Pago 3
Staff understanding of the directio;, at the October 24, 1990
Joint Park and Recreation Commission and City Council meeting
was that the Council would like to inform the puWc of the
site design work and fdcilities so as to alitlneie any
misunderstandings and misinformation that people may recaive
about the park. In that effort, staff proposes the foll.,wing
schedule be pursued once the City Council accepts tba design
plan for the Central Park Project.
1. Staff and consultants meet with the Library design
subcommittee to review the floor plane fcr the library
facility. This meeting wi:l include review of the apace
planning and design concepts of the interiors to insure
that the consultants have remained consistent with the
subcommittees direction,
2. Staff and the consultants nest with the visions Central
Pa -k subcommittees as one large group se) that a
comprehensive understanding of the park and its
facilities can be reviewed.
Staff and consultants meet with the neighborhoods
surroL-idieg the Central Park Project; to review the
ontlrs project. These meetings will prlmarUy include
the Victoria and Terra Vista developments. Staff
proper %a that there be two neighborhood nentings, one for
Terra visa residents and one for victoria residents so
that rl a groupu remain informed and thst people have a
greater opportunity of ask"ng — jestions in a more
informal setting. At ti' nevtings, staff will
encourage those ledividua_., involved in the various
aubcommittues to attend tc lrnd support and answer
neighborhood questions.
4. A community wide meeting will be held to review with the
public the Central Park Project. This public meeting
will afford a second opportunity for any persons not able
to attend the neighborhood meetings. This will allow
residents intorested in a specific facility to understand
the entire project and the individual relationships.
Again, staff will encourage members of the subcommittees
to attend to lend support and answer to residents
questions.
CENTRAL PARR
January 9, Yn91
Page 6
ne MM
Council takes action on coaxing final epplication for the,
State Grant for construction of the Library.
�. CONCLflSZON ,
The physical, cultural, social nad educational needs that can
be mat within Central Park facilities have bean identified by
a group process comprised of Council and conaiceion Hembirs,
staff, design consultants and community members of Rancho
Cucamonga. Zt is felt that the current Central Park Protect
design will moat the needs of the residents and ou: ultimate
t population.
Thank you.
Respectfully submitted,
/1j i
Joe C /1tft , CL� °
Community derv,�de Director
JS /kls
1!
0
"j