HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978/04/12 - Agenda Packetz� e
CA!"
z� e
G•:
,.CITY COUNCIL HEARIN ATE: April 12, 1978
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
',"CITY COUNCIL
OAGENDA ITEM NO.�,
ROUTING. ITEM
NON- ROU`1'INE ITEM
`DIME OF ITEM
r
ARM* West Valley / Rancho Cucamonga
FIIJVIMI?X NO: Zane Change :-:aS -82
PROPOSAL: Zone Changr from A -1 to R -3
IACATION: Southeast corner of Foothill & Baker
APPLICAN'P: Donovan Schowalter
ENGINEMVAf OIITECP:
11 PUBLIC IMARING NOTICES SENT ON 3 -30 -78 _.
REPORT PREPARM' BY: Doug Payne
FIELD 1_dSPECPION TEAM: LATE OF INSPECPICN:
PARCEL SIZE: 7.2 acres -,•,, i �r*_, efi�v
EXISTING LAID USE: Vacant and residential .-0t —tiv
ELISTING ZONING: A -1
SURROJNDING LAND USE AND ZONING u �� X '�.�•3. - .
NORr":
Vacant cc.
Zoned R -1 E r r,
EMS T: Mobilehome Park ; s i ti A• TA
AV
7.oned R -3 4 ^a+ TY15rAl
Std : Mobilehome Park �_�• •: �' , °•,
Zoned R -3 '1 •.�A'•
WEST: Vacant
Zoned A-1 ..;,:.._ t•--- "_�._. __._.- •�y,�. «.
G[NEPAL• PLAN AND D &qIGNATION:
Valley Portion County General Plan / Urban-Areas
THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ON 2 --7 -78 DETERMINED
THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD t :AVI�A__i7OtT_-SIGN EFI ECT ON THE
• ENVIRONMENT.
c
Water
Sewar
I
STAFF RDCQxtT DAPIO N:
"_,::SNNING COMM.£SSION ACTION:
staff Analysis:
Requested is a zone change to the R -3 (multiple - residential)
district on the 7.2 acre site located on the southeast cor-
ner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue. The applicant
is requesting the R -3 district to permit the development of
an apartment complex. It should be noted that prior to con -
struction, the applicant will be required to submit a Location
and Development Plan for approval. To date, this has not been
done.
The proposal as submitted would create a 180 foot wide by
610 foot long strip of A -1 zoned property surrounded on
the north, east and south by R -3 property. Should the request
be approved, it would be appropriate to change the zone dis-
tract of the entire block of A -1 zoned property located on
the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue.
The entire block is under one ownership.
it is possible that the R -3 zone district will be consistent
with the General Plan now being prepared. The request multiple
residential zone would be compatible with surrounding land
uses. The site is located adjacent to mobilehome park on
the east and is approximately 180 feet north of another.
The site fronts on both Baker Avenue and Foothill Boulevard.
Access from Foothill Boulevard will be most likely be pro-
hibited since it is designated as a divided major highway.
Baker, on the other hand, is a local road with an ultimate
right -of -way width of sixty feet. Presently, Baker accepts
traffic from the mobilehome park south of the site as wall
as many residential subdivisions south of Arrow Route. Prior
to any decision on developments in this area, the City may
desire to re- examine the carrying capacity of Baker Avenue.
The appropriate form to re- examine Baker Avenue would be through
the General Plan.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Due to the existing mobilehome parks in the area, there
is reasonable probability that the R -3 zone district
will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being.
considered.
• 2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general. plan
if the R -3 zone district is ultimately inconsistent with
the General Plan.
iki ..
3. No development plan,has been submitted r.oncurre tly with v
this zone change requeet.
4. The zone change will be in the interest of t.rtherance of
public health, safety and general welfare.
5. Prior to any land use decision for property fronti»g.on
Baker Avenue, the ultimate carrying capacity of said'.
road should re- examined.
Recommendation:
I
Based upon the findings and analysis, Staff recommends that
the item be continued until the General Plan is adopted.
However, should the commission wish to approve the request,
Staff would recommend that their decision include the A -1
zoned strip of property to the south of the site.
iu>af
'�d
Water Service:
Smvr Service:
STAFF RECOMNF- MATION:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
t ^
fit.
CITY COUNCIL 1IEARIN *ATE: April 12, 1978AGENQA ITEM NO. 3
ROUTINE ITEM ;
NON- ROUTINE ITEM
RANCHO CUCA14ONGA
TINE OF ITEM
CITY COUNCIL
A
AREA: West Valley / Rancho Cucamonga
FILE /INDEY. NO: Zone Chancre W85 --67
PROPOSAL: Zone Change from A -1 to R-•1
LOCATION: Southeast corner of 19th and Jasper
APPLICAfft: Robert' Howdoin
ENGINEEIVARCI IITECT:
41 PUBLIC luuU dG NOTICES SENT ON 3 -30 -78
REPORT PREPARFD 8Y:• Doug Payne
FIEW INSPECTION 'TEM1: DATE OF INSPECTION:
PARCEL SIZE: 1.8 acres
EXISTING WO USE: Residential and Vacant
E.XIS'TING ZONING: A -1
�..J
SURRWNDING IJ%M USE AI) ZONING
/Q /N S%
�`
NORTH: Tract 9322
-
Zoned R -1 -8500.
SI=B
EAST: Residential C /Ty
Zoned R -1 �F
k
SOUTH: Residential
Zoned fjPLAPYn
Q
R -1
WEST: Rural Residential
Zoned A -1
GENERAL PLAN AND DESIGNATION-
Chaffey College General Plan /Residential 1.6 DU /AC
THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ON 1 -5 -78
DETERMINED
T11AT THIS PROJECT WOULD I :AVLI A NON - SIGNIFICANT
' EFFECT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Water Service:
Smvr Service:
STAFF RECOMNF- MATION:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
t ^
fit.
Staff Analysis:
• i
Requested is a zone change to the R -1 district on the 2.3 acre { i
site located on the southeast corner of 19th Street and Jasper.
The site is comprised of two (2) parcels, each are under separate
ownership. The applicant states the zone change request was made
to permit a minor subdivision on the west portion of the site.
The owner of the west parcel desires to convey the southern L, .
of the parcel to the owner of the east parcel. The applicant
further states that the site would be further subdivided at
some ti:te in the future when the sewer capacity and school issues
Are resolved.
The Chaffey College General Plan, the document which governed
the site prior to City Council action on March 29 of choosing
not to•adopt said plan, calle. for a residential density between
1.6 and 4 dwelling unit per gross acre. This zone change request
would have been consistent with that density.
Surrounding densities are four (4). units to the acre. It would
seem reasonable tha the General Plan, now under preparation,
will designate the site with a similar density.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Due to the existing four (4) units per acre density in the
area, there is reasonable probability that the R -1 zone dis-
trict will be consistent with the General Plan proposal
being considered.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general plan if
the R -1 zone district is ultimately inconsistent with the
General Plan.
3. No development plan has been submitted concurrently with this
zone change request.
4. The zone change will be in the interest of furtherance of
public health, safety and general welfare.
Recommendation:
Based upon the findings and analysis, Staff recommends that the
F•. -1 zone change be approved.
r. CITY .COUNCIL HEARINGOTE: April 12, 1978
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,.CITY COUNCIL
OGENDA ITEM No. 4
ROUTINE ITEM
NON-ROUTINE ITEM
TIME OF ITEM
AREA: West Valley / Rancho Cucamonga
FILE /INDEX NO: Zone Change W92 -57 _
PROPOSAL: Zone Change from R -1 -1 to R -1- 20.000
LOCATION:W /s Hellman, approx. 2000 feet N/o Banyan
APPLICAN'r: R.L. Aroinage
ENGINFJ- WAM1ITECT:
11 PUBLIC 11FARING NOT-ICES SENT ON 3 -3A -78
REPORT PREPJJUn BY: Doug Payne
FIELD INSPEICTION TEAM: DATE OF INSPECTICN:
PARCEL SIZE: 2.4 acres
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
EXISTING ZONING: R -1 -1 � ys
SU11ROUNDING LAND USE A10 ZONING
NORTH: Residential & Vacant
Zoned R -1 -1
EAST: Vacant
lihLiMM av¢ti
Zoned R -1 -1 •- •-
SOUTH: Grove
Zoned R -1 -1
WEST: Vineyard
i; •
Zoned R -1 -1 6 -�� . �•
a ,
GENTR4L PLAN AND DESIGNATION:
None ...:..,..., I TV
THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OFFICER ON 2 -22 -78 DETERMINED
THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD HAVE A N- IGNfPTUA EFFECT ON THE
• ENVIRONMENT.
Water
Sewer
i
� t
STAFF RflCC.Y+TMATION:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
C
I
;i
Staff Analysis:
The applicant has applied "for a minor subdivision, number W78 -0087,
to divide the 2.4 acre site into four. (4) lots approximately h
acre in size. Prior to approving the minor subdivision, the site
must be rezoned to the R- 1- 20,000 zone district. The minimum
parcel size under the present R -1 -1 zone district is one acre.
The Chaffey College General Plan, the document which governed the
site prior to'City Council action on !'arch 29 of choosing not to
adopt said plan, called for a residential density up to 1.6 dwelling
units per gross acre (up to h acre lots) .. This zone change request .
would have been consistent with that density.
in reviewing lot patterns in the area, it would be appropriate
to approve this zone change request. The h acre lot siza. has been
established in the area. For example, to the north, Tentative
Tract 9505 has•been approved with a two (2) unit per acre den -
sity. on the east, Tract 9320 is recorded with h acre lots.
To the south, Tract 9340 has also recorded with h acre lots.
With the existing i acre lot pattern in the area, it would seem
reasonable that the General Plan now under preparation will desig-
nate the same density.
According to the County Flood Control District, the site may be
subject to infrequent overflow from Densens, Arealls and Thrope
Canyons. The recommendations from the Flood Control District
should be implemented by the minor subdivision's conditions of
approval.
The site is approximately 160 feet south of property presently
zoned R- 1- 20,000. one parcel separates the.site and the R- 1- 20,000
zoning. This parcel is similar to the site both in size and other
characteristics. it is, however, under different title. Since
the site is not immediately adjacent to similar = oning, the
request could be construed to be spot zoning. Therefore, should
the zone change request be approved, it would be appropriate
to include the parcel on the north in the decision.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Due to.the existing h acre lot pattern in the area, there is
reasonable probability that the R -1- 20,000 zone district will
be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered.
. 2. There is little or not probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general plan if
the R-1-20,000 zone district is ultimately inconsistent with
the General Plan.
Findings:. (cont.)
r.
3. yinor Subdivision W7.8 -0087 has been submitted concurrently
l
with this zone change request.
4. There is a demand for acre lots in the .area which warrants.
i
this zone change.
5. The zone change subject to the recommendation Erom Floci
of
public the
Control will be in the interest of furtherance
health, safety and _general welfare.
6. The parcel adjacent to the site on th•. north is similar in
size and character.
7. The property owner of the parcel to the north has been noti-
fied of this hearing.
S. The recommendation from the County Flood Control Uistirct,
can be implemented by the minor subdivision's conditions
of approval.
Recommendation:
Based upon the findings and analysisr St '•ff recommends that the
ided.
it, is re.asor's
R- 1- 20,000 zone change be approved. Furtner,
the north of the ail a, assessor
that the parcel adjacent to
parcel 1062 - 061 -02, be included in, the zone change approval.
i1
x i
I
.'0 ALTA LOM.A SCHOOL- DISTRICT
�i -1(•� 0960 BASELINE ROAD, Bu1TE F
P. O. BOX 370
AL9'A LOMA. CAUFORNlA 91701
17141 987.0766
Apr i t. 4, 1998
City o6 Rancho Cucamonga
Ptann.ing Conunab-i.on
Genteemen:
Section 39004 o6 the Education Coda ditecU the bchoot di4tAtcts ab 6attows:
To pAomote the satiety 06 pupitb and eompaehenaive community planning,
the governing board o6 each bchoot di.btnict, be6one acqu.ih.ing tWe
to p✓wpeaty bon a new 6rhooZ site on Jot, an addition to a pne6ent
schoot ti_te, aha.ee gave the ptanrxing eommiabxan having jwriedirxion
notice in twining o6 the pnopo16 aequitsiti.on. The ptanning eomu.b-
e.ion bhaP.t invebtigate -thepnopobed6.ite and within 30 day6 a6teh. Ae-
cei.pt o6 the notice, 6hatt 6ubmit to the governing board a wa.fttten
AepoAt o6 the investigation and its Aeeommendattons eoneeani.ng ac-
qu,is.ftion o6 the bite.
The govenni.ng board bhatt not aequ.iAe titee to the pnopeAty untie the
rep ^2t on the ptann.ing commi.66.in ,4. ha6 been Aece.ived. ?6 the Report
does not 6avon the aequi ziti•on o6 the property 6oA a behoot bite, oA
6oA an addition to a present schoot site, the gove4ni,".g board o6 the
schoot dF.atni.et bhaU not acqu.iAe ti✓ee to the pxopenty untie 30 days
a6teA the eommib6.i.on'6 repoAt .is Aeee.tved.
In compt•ianee with thiA taw, the ACta Loma SchooZ VUtniet uxi.bhea to begin
pnoeeedingb to obtain titee to the 6oUowing pupatieb 6o,% e.temuItany
bahoot sit":'
Pancee 1
South 112, East 112 o6 Lot 2, Btock 4, Cucamonga Homute.ad Aaboci.a-
tinn Land6. (GenenaUy weal side 06 Henmoba, approwunatety 600 6t.
south o6 19th St.) 10 acres MIL (Tax PoAcet 202 - 182 -4.)
Pakcet 2
West 1/2, Notth 114, Noathea,&t 114 o6 Section 26. (Genehafty the
eouthea6t r_oAneh. o6 WitAon and Hermosa) 10 acres MIL (Tax Pa)t-
cet 201 - 181 -39 and a ponti.on 06 201- 181 -40.)
I' i have asked to be placed on the agenda o6 your meeting a6 Apnit 12, 1978 to
1 6urtheA discuss these site acquizitionb.
Sineehety,
„'
FMS: nd
f N
1,
Floyd M., StoAk
Vibthiet Superti.ntendent
•l:
t
R. R. VIRRUN
•HTAICT WAMAaaw
,r
_ Southern Californie_Edlson Company
1357 1.. FRANCIS STREEI
ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91761
Honorable Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 793
Cucamonga, California 91730
Gentlemen:
March 30, 1978
SUBJECT: Proposed Subdivision Ordinance
The Southern California'Edison Company .appreciates the opportunity
you have given us to review the prcposed Rancho Cucamonga Subdivision
Ordinance and to present recommendations for changes and additions.
Our suggestions are based upon the experience of this Company . in -
Complying with similar ordinances in over. 165 cities and counties
and are ones the Comoauy feels are necessary to allow, it, as a public
utility, to continue to provide satisfactory service to the coamunity
of Rancho Cucamonga. We feel these suggested changes are consistent
with the intent and purpose of good subdivision principles:
U . Parcel Maps
Section 9 Dedications
Change (a) to read; "Dedications or irrevocable offers
of dedication of rights of way and easements$ intended
for public use, shall be required as a conditioa of the
approval of a parzel map, or the waiver thereof$ in the
following cases:. ."
Reason:
Thera is no longer a need for delineation of public
utility easements on record maps. The inclusion of
the phrase "intended for public use" makes the intent .
very clear.
7
EM
Honorable Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
March 30, 1978
III. Tentative Tract Maps
(k) Delete "and proposed"
Reason:
Proposed public utility easements if shown on the map '
would clutter it; also, the exact locations ase not
.
determined until the final lot lines are approved.
Further, al public utilities which are located in
dedicated road Aghts of way are in franchise position.
Section 4. Development Advisory Board
Investigation and Reports
Add (i) "A statement from the serving public utilities
that the design of the subdivision does /does not.unrea-
sonably interfere with public utility rights."
Reason:
Insurance will be provided against the event c£ lot
design and utility rights being in conflict.
IV. Hillside Development Regulations
Section 3
(k) Delete "and proposed"
Reason:
Same as for Tentative Tract Maps above.
Section 7 Public Improvements
r.
Second line, delete "and public utility"
Reason:
ti.
Standards and specifications for public utility improve-
ments are approved by the California Public Utilities
Commission.
1=
v
W-,
H -inrable. Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 3
March 3r, 1978
IM. Underground Utilities
Section 1
Change to read:
"General requirements
LI
a) Electtle distribution lines of 16,000 volts
or less, teleobone or other communication,
street lighting and cable television lines
shall be placed underground.
b) The owner or land divider is responsible
for complying with the requirements of
this section and shall make the necessary
arrangements with the serving utilities
for the installation of such facilities."
Section 3
Add "and provided that approval has been.obtained from
the California Public Utilities Commission."
X. Final Daps
Secti:.:l 1
Add "At the time the subdivider presents the final
tract-map to the Planning Commission, there shall be
presented certificates executed respectively by the
various public utility companies asithorized to serve in
the area of the subdivision, certifying that satisfactory
provisions have been made with each of the said public
utility companies as to the location of the facilities
and that satisfactory easement, when required by such
companies, have been executed and delivered to the
certifying companies for recording."
Should you have any questions regarding the above suggested changes,
please do not hesitate to contact me or Randy Bond, City /Area Manager,
at 983 -1746.
RRV•mb.
Yours truly.
R. R. Verrue
r`
•rX',. i;e" {i: i n "�'�i '�+ , r° � �'j�; �5.
•a�� atT�i21J
f71y
•�`ir *�'�a
i
r �r ari
Sn�
4y
r•�.��M _ r
.
y
AGENDA i
RANCilO CUCANGA PLANNING COMMISSION
MD
ReRUla.._. —r Me —eti�
April 12. 1978
1. Pledge of Allegiance -
Roll Call: Dahl Garcia �, Jones Rempel _, Tolstoy
2.
-,
3. Approval of Minutes.
4. Miscellaneous
Reports
Advertised Public H-arin Items
1, Proposal:
Zone Change from R -3 t^ C -1, Index No. W97 -85-
of Arrow Route, approximately
Location:
,eximate_ 204 feet south
APp-Archibald Avenue (511 acres).
332 feet east of
Chino Basin Municipal Water District.
Applicant:
Staff:
Doug Payne
2. Proposal:
7one Change from A -1 to R -3, Index No. W85 -82.
of Foothili Boulevard and Balcr Avenue.
Location:
Southwest corner
Applicant:
Donovan Schowalter
Staff:
Doug Payne
3. Proposal:
Zone Change from A -1 to R -1, Index No. W85 -67.
19th Sc reet and Jasper Street
Location:
Southwest corner of
Applicant:
Robert Bowdoin
Staff:
Doug Payne
4. Proposal:
R-1-20,0o3, index
2000 feetonorth 57
Zone Change from
Location:
man,
West side of Hellman, Pl
side
of Banyan Street
Applicant:
R.L. Acinage
Staff:
Doug Payne
Non- Hearing Itom:_
School District proposal for acquisition of property for school
1. Alta Loma
!'. sites.
Policy Items
'. 1. An ordinance to supplement the implementation of the Subdivision Map .Act-
(Discussion Only).
2. An ordinance establishing regulation and control of the location, size,
type, and number of signs permitted within the City. (Discussion Only).
�. 3. An ordinance setting requirements on minimum residential structure size
per lot size. (Discussion Only).
i.
4. An ordinance placing regulations on the placement of residential airy
i, conditioning units. (Discussion Only).
rtc