Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1978/06/14 - Agenda Packet - (2)
i OTOLARYNGOLOGY DERL[ R. RIOR011N. M.D. F.A.A.O. Y I.:1. V:'- AUDIOLOGY CENTER OF REDLANDS. MDICAL CLUSM, INC. 44R CAJON STREET PEOLANDS, CALIFORNIA 92377 1293.Z031 Ms. Barbara Salyer Willows School - P. 0. Box 801 8968 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Dear Ms. Salyer: AUDIOLOGY BRA y L. 61LLINCx. PN.D. Lim S. OLCON, M.S. 6E1YRI.Y A. Me. M.A. June 7, 1978 Following our recent telephone conversation, I visited the site of your new scheal to review the situation with respect to the noise environ- ment. On the basis of my experience, I believe that your plans to plant - shrubbery along the property line bordering on Archibald Avenue, to install heavy -glass panes in the window openings, to carpet all classrooms, and to use central air conditioning throughout the building will result in a very adequate noise environment for educational purposes. After having seen your school site, I think that the community should be appreciative that you and your group are renovating such a unique structure for present -day use. BLB:ph i D. irector, Audiology ices > ACCREDITED FORPRO►ESEIONAL AUDIOLOGY LERvIcE6 BY THE AMERICAN SPEECH AND HEARING ASSOCIATION On 1 OTOLARYNGOLOGY DzRLR R. RIOROwm. N.O. F.A.A.O. AUDIOLOGY CENTER OF REDLANDS. MEDICAL CLINIC, ING 242 CAJON STREKT REDLAND9. CALIFORNIA 92373 793.2671 AUDIOLOGY BMOL[Y 4 OILLIFOO. PM.D. LIOA IL Quwv. M.S. BEYOIILY A. NP. N.A. June 7, 1978 Ms. Barbara Salyer Willows School P. 0. Box 801 8968 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Dear Ms. Salyer: Following our recent telephone conversation., I visited the site of your new school to review the situation with respect to the noise environ- ment. On the basis of my experience, I believe that your plans to plant shrubbery along the property line bordering on Archibald Avenue, to install heavy -glass panes in the window openings, to carpet all classrooms, and to use central air conditioning throughout the building will result in a very adequate noise environment for educational purposes. After having seen your school site, I think that the community should be C appreciative that you and your group are renovating such a unique structure for present -day use. BLB:ph S cerely yours �( "radley .Billings Ph,D. Director, Audiology ervices +��` ACCREDITED FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDIOLOGY 9KRYICES BY TNC AMKR!CAN SPEECH AND NEARING ASSOCIATION Mr. s Mrs. Secondo Colombero 1003 East Balboa Boulevard Balboa, California 92661 Dear hr. E Mrs. Colombero: The purpose of this letter is to inform County Planning Department to waive the ments on your property ha= been appealei reason for the appeal is the concern of be set which will, in the long run, not City of CHG UCAMGNGA May 25, 1978 you that the decision of the requirement for street improve- to the Planning Commission. The the City that a precedent will be in the community's best interest. As you are well aware from your conversations with Mayor Frost, Council- man Palombo, and me, we had preferred that a cash deposit be made with the City to ensure the future construction of curb and gutter on your property on Etiwanda Avenue. The deposit would be placed with the City and you would incur no further cost even though the probable expense for the placement of curb and gutter would be significantly higher in future years. We anticipate that the interest earned on the special deposit would offset any cost increase for the most part. The Planning Commission hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, June 14, at 7:00 p.m. The meeting will be at the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road. At the public hearing, the staff recommendation will be that we proceed with the deposit for future street improvem. nts as outlined in my previous correspondence to you. In regret very much the inconvenience we may have caused you. Unfortunately, in my view, the County did not act in the city's best interest. Sincerely, j Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager LMW :baa POST OFFICE BOX 793. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 989.1851 a M E M 0 R A M D U M DATE: June 5,.1978 TO: Planning Commission City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Appeal of De ion of County Planning Staff As City Manager, I have filed an appeal of a decision of the San Bernardino County Planning Department. The appeal will be heard by the Planning Commission at a later date. The issue being appealed is a waiver of curb and gutter requirements which were originally listed as a condition of approval. A condition requiring that street improvements be completed is standard provision. .However, because Etiwanda Avenue in the vicinity of the project will not be improved for quite some time, the City Manager had discussed with the applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Columbero, the possibility of requiring a cash deposit equal to current costs to cover the future installation of curb and gutter when Etiwanda Avenue is ultimately widened. The cash deposit would be $6,500. Funds would be placed in a special account and would earn interest. It is anticipated that interest earned would be used to offset inflationary cost increases when the improvements are ultimately completed. If the waiver of conditions is upheld by the Planning Commission, the City has virtually no assurance that curb and gutter will ever,.be installed on the Columbero property -- particularly if the property is ever resold. We think it is appropriate that the City be certain that all future roadway improvements be installed either at the time of development or, in unusual circumstances, when other street improvements are made in the area. Since it is not feasible to complete the Etiwanda Street improvements at the time of development, the best alternative is to require a cash deposit equal to the estimated cost of improvements. The primary issue involved in this appeal is regarding the precedent which may be set if the street improvement requirement is waived. Since a major portion of our community is still undeveloped, it is, in our view, essential that street improvements he required or that the appropriate costs be de- posited to assure the completion at some time in the future. Unless funds are deposited with the City, there is no assurance that the improvements will ever be competed -- particularly if the property is sold at some time In the future. This procedure is commonly employed in similar circumstances is ^ in other communities. 6 i• Flli' 4, Planning Commission City Council June 5, 1978 Page Two The estimated cost for installtion of curbs and gutters in accordance with the City's standards is estimated at approximately $6,500. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that this appeal of the San Bernardino County Planning Staff decision be set for hearing at the next regular Planning Commission meeting, Wednesday, June 14, 1978. It is further recommended that the requirement for curb and gutter installation not be waived. However, if the property owners wish to provide a cash deposit equal to the City Engineer's estimate for cost of construction curbs and gutters, that be permitted in order to finance future street improvements on Etiwanda Avenue. IMW:baa '- i• Y tl Y V Y � � � � . .1 / J OD !UY _ W 0 ENVIRONN all .. �•" C" W g C 6 7 0 F�} H HIS ` (�� Kmm1h C. 701113109 . PLANNfNG DEPAR • O At � is °�` Sri- I- a PI"I"n, llneClOf 7111 East Mill Stree h y 3 : H1 Q pp M April ��� � � F MAIf3t1dgD3tl 10111L3M LU i '^ ii 9331A -IYNO" ' ' lu n.od Sd Seconao 'u . 4.v av 3 • SENDER. Md dW,its 1. in tile ..RETURN To' fpwe tin 1003 E. Balboa E H •V :n Balboa, Ca. 926 IC t• The following service is requested (check one)• ❑ Show to whom anddalodelivered.. ....... .. D Show to whom. date. and address of deliverY: • —a Re: Minor Dev +.a ' D Show towwhornandi date delivered ........... _a �. US Etiwanda (3 RESTRICTED DELIVERY Dear Mr. Colombe ao Show to whom. dale• and address ofdolivery.i_ mi (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) This is to advis n tion for modi- Z 2•ARTI ADDRE tDTO' 1 Division 1, Of fication involvi m ,. Al 4;•,,,._ 1. t •' \I said Code on the County Code, n _ r property describ r " quest 78 waive curb and gutter a. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: 25, 1978. curb aD of ap M REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. I INSURED NO. That the gran n tpt noytalnalgnstureofad &CuoeOr agent) erthere detri- mental to pro m e thereof. That the gran ° Ihavereceivedtheartkledescribedabavu�t�i edagtAt ely affect SIGNATUR D Addressee the General P N That the gran C +est of public health, Sa£et; p 4 ATE pFy Y ` Z O =t3 parking area Note: The paving o �-- d., x ,I to Count standa o 5•.,ADDRESS.(Ce+^PW QCitif'Itrwum' .il7f"'1�: + part and con - y err ±':i _ - '3rwise specified. dition of the ac;, m- i.: oC K l 1. Applicant shc.in g•U)•IAgLETODEUVER9ECAUSE: ern• �quirements of other San Bel' y `! srtments, including DeF {7cfota7t- o- z +4ng;•';!3lth Department, Transportati< -_:t and Firewarden fire district Ot jurisu'.'77 2. The permit granted in an approving action does not constitute a valid permit until all conditions of approval have been met. No operations may begin until compliance with all such conditions. 3. The location distances as granted in this action may not be those requested in this application, but are the maximum deviations which have been approved. 4. An approval is effective for a period of one year from the date of action. Failure to utilize the use privilege granted within the one year period automatically terminates the permit. t CAIII. Gt7ninllfl . I •1 •• I 17(1111 IIT 0 TpY /f7GR111 1 • u1R l:•.d •• 1 hi: hAP1AN SKY .. • r d h•t•• .� .', 1 •I N • •'• ^' ' l l' Iii t ?.114 I IAIR, ILIM-E A f 1.11410.0, W1 Itt11i1 it l it IitiiNl y 1., r v i•••1 n en• u' ..., I;r•II I IAIA0 11 Y. 1 •L IInU•rl ei,:!i,.. � -�' 1 '. •.. Ip,l, i.•• IAr,ll •:1 41A \1111 I1 1• 1 ..._ -_ .,i.1J•u. n..a..�` .._.., inn dtllY _. .pl.. •:':on � ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY i. " r PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1111 East Mill Street, Bldg. 1 • San Bernardino, CA 92415 • 17141383-1417 April 28, 1978 County of Sun Bernardino st. K/nnuh C. Topping - Plannmq oomtor Secondo J. Colombero 1003 E. Balboa Blvd. Balboa, Ca. 92661 Re: Minor Deviation index No. 111129 -86 E/s Etiwanda N/u ilhittram, Etiwanda MR zn Dear Mr. Colombero: This is to advise you of the action on your application for modi- fication involving minor deviations under Title 6, Division 1, of the County Code, to locate a structure contrary to said Code on property described as Lot 431, Tract 2101. This request to waive curb and gutter requirements was approved on April 25, 1978. Conditions of approval: That the granting of the request will not be materially detri- mental to property in the neighborhood or the use thereof. That the granting of the request will not adversely affect the General Plan or its objectives. That the granting of the request is in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare. Note: The paving of the driveway, access aisles and parking area to County standards is required. The following are part and con- dition of the action on this application unless otherwise specified. 1. Applicant shall ascertain and comply with the requirements of other San Bernardino County Agencies and /or Departments, including Department of Building and Safety, Health Department, Transportation Department, Flood Control District and Firewarden fire district of jurisdiction. 2. The permit granted in an approving action does not constitute a valid permit until all conditions of approval have been met. . No operations may begin until compliance with all such conditions. 3. The location distances as granted in this action may not be those requested in this application, but are the maximum deviations which have been approved. 4. An approval is effective for a period of one year from the date o£ action. Failure to utilize the use privilege granted within the one year period automatically terminates the permit. 4A1111. GIM111lItl to kl.h1,U1SKy `••cnn't hr.0 ul [16 ,al, plllit llr n iP17ha(Nn 1 •n (:. .,1 . 1 p ,., ,, •,,,,, + Ln,n.,n {li 111AIA UM "1 It�ER r 01h Mhtl . 111/111111 It Illli !t V It ,. I• "t Iln t.1t.0 11 t( I dqt ilr.h rl ,. '...6•, ,•r ••.t • .hV.11Sl MA V; 11 10 . r a Minor Deviation Index No. W129 -SF,. Secondo J. Colombero Page 2 5. This action is subject to appeal for fourteen calendar days after receipt of this notice. The appeal shall be filed.on, forms provided, and shall be accompanied by the required fee. If there are any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at 714/383 -3685. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY PLANNING DEPA MENT Doug Pay Associate Planner West Valley Planning DP:nk cc: Bldg. & Safety (2) Enforcement 0 SLCONDO. JOHN COLOMBER.O 1009 EAST BALODA OLVD. PHONE 17141 679.6872. OALSOA, CALIFORNIA 92661 March 13, 1978 City of Rancho Cucamonga`n� Attention: County Planning Ste. refs Plot Plan 129 -86 1111 East Mill Street B -1 Etiwanda Ave., Rancho San Bernardino, CA 92415 Cucamonga aka Plot Plan 118471 Gentlement With reference to the above. per County Ordinance.No. 1138, we are requesting relief from removing and replacing curb and gutter, paving and driveway. We are making this appeal on the following bas —it 1. We are not overburdening the land, which presently has curb and gutter, paving and driveway. 2. In the immediate past building permits have been issued, BAD f *fe-94br/' and buildings occupied, without the above requirements, within 800 feet of our property tot a. Kaman Bearing & Supply Corp., 8545 Etiwanda Ave. AP# 229 - 141 -10 b. N. Lawrence, Prestige Plastics, 8821 Etlwanda Ave. AP# 229 - 162 -01 c. M. Glick. 8810 Etiwanda Ave. AhF 229- 131 -07 (title company parcel maps enclosed) C'/4SN vE'/�f�7, 3. Until there can be a uniformity of street improvements in this area on Etiwanda Avenue, we feel, as indicated on the• enclosed plot, that moving the curb and gutter back would not only be a hardship to us, but would upset the present draina.e and create a hazard to the private property on both sides of us. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sin erely, .-' S J . CO 0 dHN�NW. CO EHO I • 1 cot The Honorable James Frost {,. Mayor, Rancho Cucamonga ?,rancho Cucamo� a Chamber Of Commme c� 9364 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 TELEPHONE: 714.987 -1012 �d `tQl� — }`}'�V1� 7 dune 6, 1978 Iauren M. Wasserman, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Iauren: Thank you very much for your progress report on the proposed sign ordinance of May 25, 1978. In response to your letter and with the direction of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce I am taking this oppor- tunity to send the following suggestions to you for forwarding to the Plp wing Commissioners as an aid in their deliberations. In general we are in agreement with the structure and wording of the South Pasadena sign ordinance that was sent to you by Arden Berg of California Sign Users Council. We suggest that instead of designating signing according to specific zoning that designations be made simply to commercial or industrial without any furthur detail. We believe the manner in which sign size is designated in South Pasadena's ordinance is good, concise and ie very much in line with the proposed ordinance. It is our feeling that the South Pasadena ordinance section entitled EXCEP7•IONS �1 should be included in the Rancho Cucamonga ordinance as it is important that there be a method by which owners of commercial establishments with unique sign problems can apply for special consideration. We feel that there should be no furthur bill boards allowed to be constructed within the city limits and will assist the commission in taking this stand -both as to the abatement process on bill boards and furthur construction. Finally, we. feel strongly that the South Pasadena. ordinance is correctly N� written in its section on NON - CONFORMING SIGNS. Thank you for your cooperation and the cooperation of the Planning Com- missioners in this matter. ely you Dave ump ey Exec. Director GATE FROM TO ~ INTER- OFFICE MEMO June 12, 1978 _' Douglas Payne, Associate Planner PHONE Ext. 3685 West Valley Planning Team Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission M SUBJECT. DIRECTOR REVIEW INDEX NO. W97 -93 TO PLANNING COMMISSICH The attached application for Planning Director Review of an industrial and retail project is refered to the Planning Commission for review and approval. The application was filed on May 8, 1978. The project calls for eight buildings to be used for retail sales, light industrial and heavy in- dustrial- The site fronts on the east side of Archibald, approximately 660 feet south of sixth street. The 8rito -lay Plant is adjacent to the- south. The Planning Director is refering the project to the Planning Commission since he finds that it may be inconsistant with the General Plan presently tinder consideration. The proposed General Plan in all cases calls for minimum impact industry, a light industrial category. on the other hand, the project calls for two buildings that total 40, 000 square feet for ra- tail sales, four buildings total 62,000 square feet for light industrial and two buildings that total 163,200 square feet for heavy industrial. The Zoning Code under Section 61.0219(n) (3) requires that the Planning Commission render a decision within 15 days after the Planning Director refers the item to the commission. With this constraint it would be appropriate to schedule the item for June 14, 1978. Should the Planning Commission find that the project may not. potentially be consistant. with the General Plan proposal, Staff would recommend that. commission request that the appli- cant request a continuance of his item to a date after the adoption of the General Plan. Should the applicant be un- willing to do so, Staff would then recommend that the project be denied. Attachments Enclosed. 12-1167-000 Nw: 1177 . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT .AGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1111 East KII Street, Ride. 1 • San Bernardino, CA 92415 • (714)383.1477 June 8, 1978 Vanguard Companies 9211 Archibald Avenue Cucamonga, CA 91730 County of Son Bernardino Kannillh C. Topping Planning Otref:lw J( 1.�4J�G �+ =jam lo q- ' -7'i. RE: Director Review #15197 -93, Retail and Industrial Park Dear Sirs: This letter is to inform you that the Planning Director is re- fering your application for Director Review, Index No. W97 -93, to the planning commission for review and approval. The Plan - ning Director is unable to act on said application since the City of Rancho Cucamonga is preparing it General Plan for the area. There is a probability that portiots of your project may be inconsistant with the general plan proposal. written notice of said hearina will be sent, specifying time, place and date. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call our office at (714)383 - 3685. Sincerely, ENVIRO,NI•ILNTAL IMPIIOVE14L•'NT AGENCY (PLANNING DEPARTIM 4T y Dougla.; Payne, Associate Planner West Valley Planning Team DP /mh Z. cc: Howard Morcjridge 845 S. P•iguerora St. <- Los Angeles, CA 90017 N" [.btl ti'If )I •: i•I I: ..•d .J'.ynq.nw♦ . *1� r.r, i•. ,r.•I. 'r.• Ilrlla it I(I. 10%VWU fill ,1 ••. •)4IU.t.bl uIl I: M:IAN•:KV tiu, nu•Ilh•4f.1' iuq lIti fi Iur.Fq •, ..r .. r.l• .......... - Ut(:NL ^. 11ANldl[.NGC11 .. .. flout ltr +ufu ' fJ;. , •n.11 :. 1 ,,fgyl It.l If t •r• • th f I;r llt IIANV.111(:K F!Ilh [Intl fpl, I. 714 987 -G376 ..,,,,ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (from tax bill).210 071 25....... 4. •TELEPHOMIE . ... ......... 5. GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Property location from nearest street or intersection, indicating which sj� de of street and �naming community. See attached map. Last side of Arch ibald.Avenue,(-Rancho Cucamonga,1960.6Q south . of Sixth Street ,,//��r�r� -cc�� �3a 1 SVu 6. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY OR REASONS FOR TZnS ACTION: M1 and M2 (For Office Use Only) APPLICATION FILIING DATE .: ? 7A IN,-D= NO. .k! '7 � ' �r'S ZONE CLASSIFICATION. % /....�1:? a RECEIPT NO. & FEE.... Dear Sir: Your request for Director Review and Approval for has been subject to the following conditions: The findings and reasons for this action include the following: 1. Site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. 2. Improvement is properly slated to street and highway. 3. Improvement is coexistent with adopted standards and policies. This action is subject to appeal and if no appeal has been filed will become effective ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY FLANNING•DIVISION cc: building & Safety ov A P P L I C A T I O N F 0 R H CV) 1. TYPE OF PRWECT OR ACTIG .....RETAIL AND INDUSTRIAL PARK 2, APPLICANT'S NAME..'.,, VANGUARD COMPANIES DAB .. 3. MAILING ADDRESS...... �Z11.Archibald_Avenuc� Cucamonga &I .__ZIP CODE..91730 „ _ , I. 714 987 -G376 ..,,,,ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (from tax bill).210 071 25....... 4. •TELEPHOMIE . ... ......... 5. GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Property location from nearest street or intersection, indicating which sj� de of street and �naming community. See attached map. Last side of Arch ibald.Avenue,(-Rancho Cucamonga,1960.6Q south . of Sixth Street ,,//��r�r� -cc�� �3a 1 SVu 6. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY OR REASONS FOR TZnS ACTION: M1 and M2 (For Office Use Only) APPLICATION FILIING DATE .: ? 7A IN,-D= NO. .k! '7 � ' �r'S ZONE CLASSIFICATION. % /....�1:? a RECEIPT NO. & FEE.... Dear Sir: Your request for Director Review and Approval for has been subject to the following conditions: The findings and reasons for this action include the following: 1. Site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. 2. Improvement is properly slated to street and highway. 3. Improvement is coexistent with adopted standards and policies. This action is subject to appeal and if no appeal has been filed will become effective ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY FLANNING•DIVISION cc: building & Safety ov SAN SeRNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT INTER-OFFICE MEMO DRTE May 30, FROM Flood Control District Ext. 2388 Water Resources -Land Development ` TO .Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager Rancho Cucamonga and Count-j Planning Commission SUBJECT TENTATIVE TRACT 10210, RANCHO CUCAMONGA - PRELIMINARY REPORT By receipt of your transmittal received on May 23, 1978, this office was requested to review and coimnent on the subject tract. The proposed tract is located west of Sapphire Street, north of Almond Avenue, in the north Rancho Cucamonga area. The westerly portion of this tract is traversed by Cucamonga Creek Channel. Cucamonga Creek is a major watercourse serving to outlet tributary mnuntainous drainage originating to the r.6:th. The creek in this reach is unimproved and during major storms, eroslon and sloughing of the creek banks can be expected. The tract is also located at the base of steep mountainous hillsides which during major storms deposit debris -laden storm flows onto,the site. In addition, the site is traversed by several natural drainage courses originating primarily onsite and also local drainage flows from the east. Therefore, in our opinion,. the westerly portion of the tract adjacent to the east bank of Cucamonga Creek is subject to infrequent flood hazards due to serious bank erosion in the event of a major storm. The tract is also subject to infrequent flood hazards due to overflow, erosion and debris deposition from debris -laden flood flows from the northeast in the event of a major storm. Due to past experience in the County on similar developments adjacent to major watercourses, bank sloughing and slope erosion can be expected during heavy rains and saturated conditions. The site is generally j subject to sheet overflow from mountainous thunderstorms. In order to intercept the debris -laden storm flows from the north, the Flood Control District has recommended the construction of an interceptor channel originating several hundred feet east of Sapphire Street and traversing to the west into Cucamonga Creek as a part of the proposed tract developments. The interceptor is proposed to be located along the southeasterly portion of the proposed tract partially within an existing L.A.D.W.P. power line ease - ment. 11oc;ever, in order to provide an adequate right -of -way width to construct the facility, and also provide a minimum of 35 -feet clearance from the existing power line towers, it will be necessary to have additional right -of -way dedicated south of the power line easement. The developer has made provision of 80 -feet right -of -way which should be adequate- In addition, Cucamonga Creek Wash area should be dedicated in fee title to the District for future flood control purposes. 12- 10163 -697 ~' . Yibr.f.. A• Y -. <'- ..r}LiYr.f •. • anL .ry SYAtCk..Y: p• .... .,' .2 .... ' +/�. - Y N.• •1.n.).. .'1V.i Kt 'l'• :.;Ynuw.. Tract 10210 ' May 300 1978 page 2 our preliminary recommendations are as follows: 1. That a minimum setback for any structures of 150 -feet from the top of bank of Cucamonga Creek be established because of bank erosion and sloughing inherent of this type of development. 2. That adequate fee right -of -way along the southeasterly portion of the tract, and offsite as necessary, be dedicated to the Flood Control District to provide for the extension of the Almond Intercept Channel. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for handling onsite drainage and dewatering the tract in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 4. All lots should drain to streets or other drainage facility. If not, the cross -lot drainage should be reviewed by the Building and Safety Department and provisions for handling same made under the various ordinances involved. 5. The westerly portion of the tract appears to lie within existing Flood Control District easement right -of -way. The westerly portion of the proposed tract within the Flood Control District easement area shall be dedicated to the District and shown on the final tract map. Any en- croacliments into the District's rights -of -way shall be by permit from the District. Additional right -of -way along Cucamonga Creek may be necessary. Right -of -way access for the proposed tract streets to Cucamonga Creek should be provided. 6. The Almond Intercept Channel should be extended easterly to intercept drainage r•inoff from this development and conduct the flows to Cuca- monga Creek. 7. A detailed drainage study and plan should be submitted showing how the onsite and offaite drainage will ie handled, especially debris. Generally, closed conduits that receive mountain drainage flows directly are not recommended due to the possibility of plugging. NOTE: Due to the steep terrain and erosion potential, a stringent progran of slope and erosion control should be undertaken by the developer to prevent damage to the site and downstream properties during heavy storm runoffs, especially during the construction stage. SKv.km CC! Toups Corporation J. Gregory Lawlor Enterprises Fred & Gladys Schulhof Carol Shuihcf Velmen Transportatio-i Department Building & Safety Department BILL C. HANK Assistant Floo Control Engineer Water Resources -Land Development i r Project No. 1915- 035 TOUPS CORPORATION tj. 3 7223 Avw*M De la Playa . Teebp ep4))4 el62 'TRANSMITTAL To: LAUREN WA5SERMAN /City of Rancho oats: 5/18/78 ucamonga Box 793 subject: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: The following Rama are transmitted: Herewith ❑ Under S:irarete Cover CG Via: No. of Copies Description The above Items ere submitted: At your request ❑ For your review ❑ For your flies ❑ For your approval ❑ Foryour action ❑ For your information ❑ Generalreme::a: Dear Lauren: Enclosed is a copy of the County's letter regarding archaeologic resources on Tract No. 10210.-'_ Please call if you have any questions Enclosure: p Copies to: %ZY Rikki McClint Environmental PfC A Ptara ft Rnewch Cmryrattr tint _ la�liy,�` .. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY _ �'��} r - -• pill ASSOCIATION '° Trlrphone 171.1, 877.2272 161AIL1NG ADDRESS . 2024 ORANGE TREE LANE • REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA 92973 July 7, 1976 Fred Schulhof 17549 Plaza Otonal San Diego} CA 92128 Subject: Archaeological - Historical Assessment of parcel numbers, 200 - 051 -067 07, 519 12, 20 (Section 17); lot no. 4 (Section 21); and lot no. I (Section 20), 'township 1N, Range 717, Mount Baldy, 7.5' USGS Topographic map. The proposed project nronerty development borders Cucamonga Canyon and the edge of the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains. Neither the canyonnor the foothills are at present being planned for develop- ment. The entire property is in the Alta Loma area, north of Almond and west of Sapphire, and consists of approximately 162 acres. No archaeological or historical sites are listed for the area, as indicated by a literature check performed, utilizing the archaeological and historical site files housed at the San Bernardino County Museum. Probably, however, a portion of the area was searched by prospectors for minerals in the early historic period. In addition, portions of the project areawek& probably used by the Indians of the Rancheria of Cucamonga for (1) gathering food materials and (2) as a means of gaining direct access to the mountains. The literature check, however, t revealed no direct references to this area's use either as a mining area or as a locality utilizel by the Indians. The availability of water and food resources, including several species of yucca and oak, would have made this area likely in terms of Indian occupation, however. The survey performed did reveal the presence of archaeological materials. This included a metate slick found at the western edge of 'J the property and a microlitic core utilized as a hammerstone. Vo other materials were noted by the survey team, which consisted of 1. Robert Reynolds, Jim Crowell, Tom Greer, and Mike Anderson. All have had substantial survey experience prior to this survey..The survey revealed the *area has a history of being heavl "- disturbed owing to its use . as a recreational and camping area by .-.cal residents. Such disturbance as was noted cannot lead us to suggest the site as being appraised as olgnificWt in terms of its archaeological or historical value. Because it doe s0 eet the criteria, it will, furthermore, not be recommended for nomination to the National Registry of Historic Places in Washington. If the project is approved it will not have a direct, significanjfeffect!;, upon the archaeological resources of San Bernardino County. 451 y� 9,.? ZT' 1 0�K ti �`_ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY I& USEU I& t .w "yam � �w - �.. •• �-� . " ASSOCIATION Telrphone 1714 1 877 -2272 MAILING ADDRESS 2024 ORANGE TREE LANE • REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA 92379 This letter has been reviewed by Dr. Gerald A. Smith, San Bernardino County Historic preservation Officery who concurs that no sites of archaeological or historical value have been recorded for this property and that no known'significant site is known to exist nearby that would be adversely affected by this project should it be approved* r ereJN` im Crowell Curator - Intern San Bernardino County Museum IN ER - OFFICE MEIV10 � DATE June 13, 1978 FROM John R. Shone PHONE 383 -1203 Acting City Engineer TO Lauren Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT WAIVER OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS In accordance with your request, attached is a copy of that portion of the County Code pertaining to Waives% of Street Improvements. 0Awa� John R. Shone JRS:ch Attachment DATE: June 28, 1978 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Transition of Planning Services from San Bernar- dino County The staff of the Community Development Department look forward to.working with the Planning Commission. We are attempt- ing to establish an orderly phase down of County planning services so that the City may resume these services at a municipal level. We see many problems ahead of us. Not only has the County had unique methods of dealing with certain planning issues, it has had a unique way of phasing down their operations over the last thirty days. The files are in chaos, many projects previous- ly approved have difficulties associated with them, certain or- dinances and review procedures are inconsistent with currently accepted planning practices, and last, but not least, the enthu- siasm of County staff in phase down operations is overwhelming. At the same time, there is a great deal of demand for planning information, as well as, complaints by property owners and developers regarding previous approvals. Such an environment creates enormous difficulties for orderly transition and imple- menting a new planning program. Fortunately, the City Council has allowed the staff to not accept new planning applications until after August 1. It is hoped that the Planning Commission will understand the complexities of the situation while we forge a new planning program. We are finding it necessary to spend a great deal of time with individuals, both in person and through telephone con- versation so that we can begin building public confidence in the city's new role and its ability to be sensitive to the problems of homeowners and developers alike. It is important, especially for a new community, to establish good public relations if it is to receive support for its planning programs and achieve success in fostering quality development. Together we can deve- lop a very effective planning program for the community. Again, the staff looks forward to working with you. Respectfully submitted, Tack Lam j Community Development Director DATE: June 28, 1978 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Transition of Planning Services from San Bernar- dino County The staff of the Community Development Department look forward to working with the Planning Commission. We are attempt - ing to establish an orderly phase down.of County planning services so that the City may resume these services at a municipal level. We see many problems•ahead of us. Not only has the County had unique methods of dealing with certain planning issues, it has had a unique way of phasing down their operations over the last thirty days. The files are in chaos, many projects previous- ly approved have difficulties associated with them, certain or- dinances and review procedures are inconsistent with currently accepted planning practices, and last, but not least, the enthu- siasm of County staff in phase down operations is overwhelming. At the same time, there is a great deal of demand for planning information, as well as, complaints by property owners and developers regarding previous approvals, Such an environment creates enormous difficulties for orderly transition and imple- menting a new planning program. Fortunately, the City Council has allowed the staff to not accept new planning applications until after August 1. It is hoped that the Planning Commission will understand the complexities of the situation while we forge a new planning program. We are finding it necessary to spend a great deal of time with individuals, both in person and through telephone con - versation so that we can be in building public confidence in the city's new role and its ability to be sensitive to the problems of homeowners and developers alike. It is important, especially for a new community, to estab.ish goad public relations if it is to receive support for its planning programs and achieve success in fostering quality development. Together we can deve- lop a very effective planning program for the community. Again, the staff looks forward to working with you. Respectfully submitted, FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Environmental Review for the development of a recreation vehicle center located on the north- west corner of Hellman Ave, and Foothill Blvd. C -2 zone. Request submitted by Robert Packer. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The development of a recreational center or sales and reps r of recreational vehicles on approximately two (2) acres of land located on the northwest corner of Hell- man Ave. and Foothill Blvd. (Exhibit "A "). The development plan indicates the construction of two permanent 6,000 sq. ft. buildings to b_ used for parts storage, sales, and service of motorcycles, mopeds, four -wheel drive vehicles, trailers and motor homes. In addition, t"ai.ler units, totaling 2,880 sq. ft.. will be utilized temporarily for the business until permanent buildings are constructed. A steel storage building, of 500 sq. ft., is proposed to be located adjacent to the temporary trailer units. Further the applicant has indicated that two additional. permenant buildings will.be constructed as his bus- ',ness grows, however, he has not indicated where these buildings will be located. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The site is located.on the northwest corner of Hel man Ave, and Foothill Blvd. and encompasses approx- imately two (2) acres of land. The site has 300' of frontage on both Hellman and Foothill. The site is presently used as a vine- yard, zoned C -2, and contains no structures. Surrounding land uses and zoning are as follows: Land Use 2o^ ning North Single family dwellings South Vacant land, developing single family dwellings East Mobil home park and motel West Real estate office /vacant land R3 R3 R3 7 Jib, r. .tiM1tt, „1-e. _Z— e Power lines .traverae-the center of the property in. an east- west direction. "' Further, complete street improvements have not been installed. BACKGROUND /HISTORY: Mr. Packer submitted a non- hearing site approvaL application to the County in mid -May. In the early part of June, the County contacted Mr. Packer and indicated to him that they had received a significant number of negative comments from surrounding property owners. Therefore, since the project became a controversial issue, environmental review and a public hearing was required. The project was then sche- duled by the County for environmental review at the City Plan - ning Commission meeting of June 28, 1978. The County Planning Staff has not prepared any reports for this meering and the City Planning Staff did not receive the project file and information until Friday, June 23, 1978. Upon reviewing the information contained in the project file, City Staff diecovered.that the information was not adequate to complete .a comprehensive In+.tial Study. It is unfortunate, given the length of review time that this project has experienced, that the City Staff is unable to make an environmental determination based upon the information supplied. Staff tried to contact the applicant, but -found that he was out -of -state and not expected to return before this report was compiled. RECOMMENDATION: Planning S�:aff recommends continuance of envir- onmental rev ew on this project to the July 26, 1978, meeting. This time will enable Staff t.:meet with the applicant in order to obtain necessary information. to complete an adequate Initial Study and a comprehensive site plan. Respectfully submitted, r Yt- ac c Lam Community Development Director q 1 The • • wing -in forma report supplied by n �• Applicant tl , �r . t� � • 11 11'.Il�ll �.l-i-1 I It(� TABLE OF CONTENTS 1s introduction and Summary Z. Personal Background 3, Business Background 40 Building Program Setbacks and Problems 5. Financial Impact Upon Business 6.. Acoustical Analysis A. Analysis of Calculations B. Calculations 7s Petitions and Letters of Reference A. Petition from Businesses'and Residents Within 300 feet of Property B. Letter from,Mr. Cartwright Cg Petition from Rancho Cucamonga Residents D. Letter from Upland Chamber of Commerua 11 E I INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Motorcycles have.t.raditionally been associated with noise and /or black leather jacket hoodlums and just as al'l. businesses have their weirdos so does motorcycling. But in the 1960'a Honda coined the phrase 'you meet the nicest people on a Ronda". The public image started changing then and so did the type of people riding motorcycles. Now you meet lots of nice people riding motor• cyclen for transportation, family fun and sport. In 1970 people started becoming aware of noise pollution. Standards for motorized vehicles were formulated and the amount of noise that vehicles can emit has slowly been lowered. Motorcycles have come under scrutiny and they must not exceed 83 db of noise output. I sell Suzuki motorcycles and U. S. Suzuki cannot manu- facture a motorcycle for highway or road use that does not comply with that law. Therefore I cannot sell a noisy motorcycle for highway or road use. (See figure 1 -6 Vehicle Code) This report has been prepared to acquaint the reader with Robert and Karen Packer, their motorcycle business and the financial problems and relocation efforts, Also, a brief acoustical analysis has been prepared by Robin To Harrison of HW Acoustics Inc, This analysis shows that motorcycles operated in the parking lot at the rearOgr in the service department will not cause an increase in noise level, Noise levels are not arithmatically additive. Petitions and letters are presented in Section 7. These bear out the results' of the analysis in ,section 6. We could not do busi-- ness within the close proximity of the homes, business offices and businesses if we were noise polluters. To summarize this report I believe it can be said that we are conscientious people concerned about the well being of the community and of it's residents. We have done and will continue to do our best to build a business place that will be a credit to the community. We are not noise polluters and our buFiness deserves a place in the community. However time is of tk'. essence and the time for action is now. The last seven months of procastination by the county should be put behind use We want to move ahead with the new Rancho Cucamonga city government and 0 et our business relocated and underway. 0 0 OHC 6T to v9p OR Flom! sral (2) I-w Ctiij 19jw1i�r�x�i vial 't .Gm- (ann�jm ,=T 11113'm OL81 '1 AJillmf "pt IM 'CIAT Mule Yqp E8 .......... ......:.... ............................... 8Lbj alolaq Puv olL6l Yqp 98 ....... ............ v9P 89 ............... ........................... ...............SaloJaq Pull $ L6I .EL6I 01" Pug , L961 i �panlagJn alotu 10 spmad OOg J° Sugb ag8tam ala!gaA sso8 0 4 4!m Ja4ow (m of .(!ddu llugs s1I -ull o"ou Hulmo !I o J a 4)'O OZLZ u0paas Jo sasodand oql . 103 •yOL Z I11511M AP /WA + +a0 •Purlod &6fk pajpv"x7 sAp/9eA jV gilm" VL81'I A-*vnmf —"113 -4181 'nws'(V'to pappV •ZL61 JOUO paln4aolnuow angowmous Aug of 61ddu Ilogs vqp Z8 Jo 4!wll v9Ou 444 'OOZLZ uopan)o uasodind aq4 log -aZLZ I /wiz �ygemw�ous 'LLBL'1 .tl+ncn( a,%;pojp3 VIA1 = 1113'io Vj p=puaary . .. UST I .4mm( aepaajp vul mils Ve -L ] MPv Y9POL ......................................................................... ...........................686T 1aUy (9� v'4p SL .................................... ..............................« 06GT 01oJaq P� S66I 1a4)v s v�lv m ...................................... ............................... , - .,........._ - - -- - - -- - &OW L -- J ^I r —w YJAI '°yp V L J Vqp 98.- ........................................ .............:..............21A a1oJa 1 F ZL6I 1alJy Z v9p8B ...................... ......................... I ... .,..............EL6I aaoJaq PLTe'696T 1a�fy T ddu 'pa1n4o8Jnuew'ala C0 uanup-awaw 8 ump 13y4O'Q13A;)Ja4ow ,(uv o4 [ I(nIs s pml bslou 3%,AOIIOJ oq)'00ZLZ uopaas Jo sasodand ag41g3 'ZOZLZ 414917 op uvjokV . Vial'? • mtswf mpa ko w? '11•Is'C4'ID Poppv '01AI O10Jaq Pal40oJnubw 013Aololow .(uu o4 Alddb l(ggx yqP Z610 lyur,l aslou aq4 'OOZLZ uo!laaS Jo casodand oql jog 'IOZLZ awil PpAwwow 0,4(1 • w t1ORC �N�S uj p" -Pap. cBvH+ ^IJ mllPwal0P P°1wIPv1 U)Im,:d 4thf pm t.Wnm PnNIR7I WI WPP+ iwwPuaunP� U V1ot'[ 114949 -;WJ)3 wal -sms V2210 P°Pu my VLSI '1 Am-( QAPaJO •4Lb1 MTIS -N -43 Pyry "I'd) ZLSI J° 4ay TQ14llOJ as!0N s( ) °4 ►10 (Z) (a)9 uopaaS u! pm sg. 8u!st:W11, usJat oql 04 4u218AlnbO sl ..lOjgSa1 uuo4 oq4 'uopoas ul Pam sv (J) (4Lm -I'd) ZL6I jo 1-ry 1o14uO3 as!oN7) a44 04 4uonsJnd riauosy tzoga`,4atd I'luouruculnug ag1 10 104vilslu!urpy ago Aq ala!gaA 1O4out 11 guns 1oJ pa4dopu suogbl1t9a1 JO sPnPOLIs uolwwa aslou ag4 9049101A .tom .tug u! 10 spaaaxo 4841 aslou saanpwd galgm ( &Vs uogaas y /ml yuprnwwoo)l gyr IJot LIfGr urpTp sold,( ) su uogballpuap! 01 4aa(gns alolgan blow AeA%q$!q•,llo uv 4efaax� alaigan blow mau a ales 141 lapo 10 1143 lltr4s uouad oN (a) JO 4ay 1o14uo3 oslON s( ) a44 o4 4vansand,(aua8y uogaaTora 1° J°Ivl4slulwpy oq4 Aq pa4dop8 uaaq 4ou OAbq suopgln8a110 aslou galgm 101 Ptm 'alaplu mul u! paylaads If°'!I as!ou olquat aslou wnwucrw v saonpoid ga!4m '(OOMV uorJOas gjin ua�scua ur�pLlaud ,( ) su uoqu;llluopl of loa(gtls olal40A ua idaaxa -p-%.A .Oloul mau 8 ales JO] IajjO 10 nos Imus 4sa4 aqt uop8lappuoo olu! 8 o g Rom 8lf{�b' aq4 Aq pagsngmsa a � 'l 11 d g !aj a911�Is I Rig 3!44 4iln+ aauondwo0 J apglo Rq4 t sg 21,13 (F1aa O.Jolvap b 4da`ag Attu sa aI PA 1olo34 Jo 1o14gd tgmq�IH gnuol.1m al Pagsnglnsa sa.mpoaotd 4sa41apun (an814Jo auipaluao a44 ,(q Zi 'ATQ II Pnsom BAc1(GROu1,TD My wife and I and family moved to Alta Loma fourteen years ago and have seen Alta Loma grow from sleepy little groups of houses among the citrus groves to the explosive growth we now see. We came from Seattle, WAshington where I had earned a degree in Physics from the University of Washington. My last job before going into business cal de'• was with Xerox where I worked as a Project Engineer on opti vices for night security. Cur three sons all graduated from Alta Loma High School. Cur oldest son completed a two year mission for our church in Central America and is presently working on a degree in Business Administram tione our second son works with us in the business and our third son is presently in Peru on a two year church mission. Our daughter attends Alta Loma high School and will be a senior next year• our family enjoys camping, motorcycl6 ridings hiking and many outdoor activities. L9efs much time as possible in Baja California explore ing out of the way places and enjoying the beauty there& We are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Sainte in Alta Loma and both my wife and I work in the youth prc,• grams in the church. I am currently Explorer advisor of Post 644• I was instrumental in starting a motorcycle•driver training program at Alta Loma :sigh Schools one of three pilot programs in Southern Californias and I furnish motorcycles for the program. I also present lectures on motorcycle safety to the local high schools during the years I am on the advisory board °or the Baldy View ROP program. When we started thanking of building a new facility a few years ago we rejected Cucamonga at first because it was "too far out in the sticks" and did not have much to offer. The appearance of the buildings was poor and the general business climate did not seem to be good. However we now feel that the city has an exciting future and the want to be part of it. Vie designed our buildings with a Spanish motif and have selected the beat materials for construction. F, 17e believe. in the upgrading of the area and would be the last to " suggest anything less, When our building is completed we hope other businessmen will see ;.what we have done and upgrade their facilities, This is progress in'the community and we feel that we are part of that progress . xII BUSINESS BACKGROUND In 1970 we started the motorcycle business. It was located on Foothill Boulevard for six months until the quarters became too small and we moved to-60 Bast 9th St..in Upland. Via have been on the raall in the Upland Town Center for almost eight years and have conducted a successful operation without altering the environment of the area. The business is a family business managed by myself, my wife and one son. We have nine employees, all who depend on the business for their livelihood. Two are married. One is retarded and spent 20 of his 36 years in an instutition. He has worked for us for five years and now is able to live in a home in Pomona and pay his own way. The business was started with the idea that motorcycling was a respectable pastime and a pleasant environment should be provided where a family could shop for a motorcycle or parts and feel comfort-* able in the surroundings. I believe we have accomplished that obi• jective and we are proud of the business and the service it provides to the community. However, we have known for years that 9th street in Upland was not the best location for the business■ We have looked for suitable buildings or property for several years. Many hours have been spent looking at property and buildings and as the Alta Loma Cucamonga area grew we started looking further east on Foothill. Two years ago our lease ran out and the landlord would not renew it no we stepped up our activities to locate a new home for the business. Since we had to operate on a limited budget it was difficult to get anything going that would satisfy our re- quirements. In August, 1977 our building was sold to.a real estate company and the rent was immediately doubled from $600 to $1200 per month. Knowing that ;he building was sold we doubled our efforts to either locate a building on Foothill or buy a piece of land. We wont into escrow in October, 1977 to buy property at Foothill and Hellman. In March when our landlord became aware that our building program was foundering he raised our rent to $3000 per month. The Foothill property is 3001by 300' (approximately two acres) and we are planning a recreational vehicle center that will event-6 ually be comprised of four buildings. The first two buildings will house the Suzuki business, the moped business, a cycle parts business, 0 a used cycle parts business, and two new businesses, a four wheel drive business and a trailer / motor home parts business.. When I am ab7b Anancially and business growth. dictates I will build two more buildings on the property and move the four wheel drive and trailer parts businesses into their own buildings. We determined approximately two months ago that.a temporary solution to our problem would be trailer modules quickly moved onto our property. That solution has not boon quick and has appeared to slow down plot plan approval for the permanent buildings. however w; badly nood the trailers to house the business until the buildings are built. It takes 60 days to get the trailers after they are ordered and we are out of time. We are not big, we are not developers and we do not have big money behind us* however we do own a piece of property with the proper zoning for a motorcycle shop. Vie have a bank that has agreed to lend us money Our business is floundering becauee we have not been permitted to build the building we need so badly. We have not tried to work aro?uld the system. We have cooperated with every person in every agency and department we have dealt withq but it seems that each step of the watt we have encountered appalling and unbelievable problems. We are asking for the opportunity to save the business that we have struggled for eight years to build to its present level. Within a very short period of tine the business will be closed down if the trailer modules are not quickly approved and the building permits are not issued for the permanent b►ildingse � x; t t � 0 IV 0 BUILDING PROGRAM BACKGROU D * Started looking for property for building two.years ago * Located property on the corner of Hellman and Foothill and went into escrow October 12, 1977 +► Prepared plot plan and submitted it through Building and Safety in Ontario December 4, 1977 * County estimated that approval on plot plan would take one month (seven months lath and it is still not done) + Prepared plans for building and submitted them to Building and Safety for plan check January 12,1978. They estimated it would take one month. +� Building loan approved February 28, 1978 + By 1-lay zhe plot plan was still not approved and the problems (see Section 5) were so bad that a plan was devised to occupy temporary trailer modules on the property • Discussed the trailer modules with county planning and they suggested putting the building and the temporary trailers together as joint application on site plan approval * May 15 -• building plans checked and approved (4 months) * Application was filed for site approval May 16 vrith an estimated approval time of one month Met with Mr. Stevens at building site to discuss prob•b lems with setbacks and driveways, (first and only time at building site with the county) * Informed by Air, Stevens site plan would be approved June 13 • June 2 -• notified by Doug Payne that three people had responded to notices sent out, but this should cause no problems because the zoning is C2 * June 9,,•- notified by Doug Payne that a public hearing would be required June 16 filed papers for public hearing * June 19 +■ notified by city that they would be able to go'. hearing on June 28 calendar 0 June 20 +• notified by city that city staff was going to reccomend an environmental impact study be prepared Summary Approximately seven months have elapsed since I first filed for plot plan approval on December 4.1977• If the present trend cony tinuess and more hearings and studies are required I will be dusting off my engineering books and updating my resume because I won't have a business to support me, I want to continue with my building plans, get the buildings built and got on to more important things like running the business, This should not be an unreasonable request and I hope the Rancho Cucamonga city management and planning commission can expedite matters and get things going, M V FINANCIAL IMPACT * Present building in Upland sold and new landlord raised rent from $600 /month to $1200 /month to 43000 / mcnth- Increase to $3000 occurred in March, 1978, presently costing $2400 more per month for rent, ■ Signed agreement to be out of building by August 15 -- unable to locate another building• If temporary location at new site not ready by August 15 we will be out of business, * Building loan approved in February will not be valid if not used by August 31- Commercial money not avail+ able now from any source, + Interest rates have increased 1 V8 % since the first of the year .- on a 20 year loan this will increase interest costs by $76,000, + Building costs have increased approximately 10% since February will cost about $302000 more for building construction + yellow Page advertizing (which is my beat advertizing media) was designed in January for.May distribution of telephone books - our address and telephone numbers are wrong and new businesses are advertized that were scheduled for now building that doesn't exist. Summary w- Due to the seven months process of trying to obtain plot plan approval I have incurred a $100900 increase in my building costs• I will have to close my business if I cannot move onto my property utilizing temporary quarters by August 15. This will destroy my livelihood, employment for nine people and eight years of work. 0 VI ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS The analysis presented in this section was prepared by 8obin T. Harrison of HW Acoustics, Inc. His credentials are long and he has worked for years in private business and for the U.S. govern- ment on noise measurement, analysis and methods to reduce its The Case 1 situation (see analysis) shows that a motorcycle i operated in the parking lot at full throttle will emit 83db, at 35 mph 80db and at the more likely speed (20 mph) the noise output is 71db. The closest house is 175 feet from the rear of the service department and the calculation shows that the noise level at the roar of the closest house will be 60db if a motorcycle is operated at full throttle at the rear of the service department. This full throttle situation never happens because via don't like loud noises ourselves and besides there is no need for it. However if it should occur the noise level of 60db is equivalent to the noise•output of a kitchen blender or TV set, i.e., a wide open motorcycle at the rear of the service department will probably not be heard over the television set. If the Foothill and Hellman car and truck noise is considered, it is more audible than a motorcycle in the parking lots. Consider Case a (see analysis), tuneups inside the service departments The people occupying the closest house will not even be aware that a bike is running if they are in their back yard the car and truck traffic noise output will exceed that of the motorcycles What about a motorcycles at full throttle at the back of the building? Refering to figures 2 and 3 of this section we see that two motorcycles putting out 83db does not make a sound level of 166dbs The noise output is actually 84s9dbs This case can be a%-- tended to any amount of motorcycles. To lessen the noise even more I plan to plant a row of dense evergreen trees across the north line of the property. This will attenuate the noise even more and will be even less than shown in the calculations. I plan to post a parking lot speed limit.of 15 mph and enforce it, install speed bumps and keep the service department doors closed. F Decibels are logarithmic quantities so they can not be added directly; i.e., 80 dB +, 80 dB dons not equal 160 dB. To add two. sounds; use figure 111 -A and the following procedure: STEP EXAMPLE 80 dB +83 dB =? • l Subtract the lower level from the higher. 83 dB - SO dB = 3 dB • 2 Enter the horizontal axis of figure III -A with • Line A -B -C an the this value. Go vertically to the line, then art horizontally to the vertical axis: Read the value on the vertical axis. 3 Add the vertical axis value to the higher level. 83 de + 1.8 d6 = 84.8 dB ( To sum more than two levels, the procedure is to add two at a time, then add the sums logarithmically, and so on, until the ultimate sum is found. Example: What is the total noise level of a 70 dB motorzycle, two 74 dB motor- cycles, a 78 dB motorcycle, and an M dB motorcycle? Solution: 70 x-75.5 74 74 79.5 78 82.8 80 83.5 dB ..* — answer I f, a fy Another factor worth considering is that the, business is a daytime business. We are open from 9 :00 P14 to 5:30 PM* During the day any parking lot noise will be masked by the Foothill and Hellman car and truck noise* .in the early morning and evend.ng hours when the noise.from street traffic has lessened and people are home from work there will not be any noise from the business because.we will be closed. These calculations and analyses show that a noise problem does not exist. Of course the final analysis of any situation isv what happens in actual practice. We have been in the. actual practice mode for eight years iu the Upland Town Center. The letters and potitions presented in section 7 bear out these facts. The people who signed the petition presentee in 7A all work or live within 300 feet of Allied Suzuki. tor. Cartwright's letter in sect ion 7B Is certain TACO our good intentions and practices$ and the compliance of our motorcycles with the vehicle code. Therefore I suggest and recommend that further analysis and study is meaningless and, would not serve any purpose* f t 6 G />.^ A7 $ ,Boise /� : �cic dSrv„ - • Pra/bsPC� .A / /r�cf �l /C . /� v /���'y Eo t a or/ u.rdr.- to r DrProv 7'& oea %le■- d 3 de/Q (3 5d -Caw PdIV /Pier/ - 3SarPh crtl•sc - �o &47511, 4,-P /y ZP,.r/ �'o zo 71 c4B,4 (3sAiC' Evi.+ �sSus+sr++j 0 Loss �by9 frrrS� w4 / /s, .�tG,, yNP /�'^�f Ca "s On, %9 s ii>eQrci w,✓Ohe .eoct6t4 ©Hy w4ore 61Z .,s qrt �y Co�,p4•rs�- �QsSa.a� �r�c,Es oy rogcf „�4,L� 8�'r/F.dl� /S 20; �r�Pt �von7 �hP �iP4rYSr �(lvrroyr e j, frotfiC /S 9PP'0 Xim li•If 75c 6 G8 Sd 1 47 r �l,� ,Ac�rr�4t� ho�.5 �i // 4e�F 5�6�• cis 4 • L'HPr /5' -2d 6` • • - ti �5 4ircl8d. Vivol ma rot, ",oy mor he a4c6/e Qt fy /s /PAP /. / /ay /rye/ j 410 4" 63 C(gAf Le-,, e/ a-P.i/ do rc°c/u'PZ h�/ 9c C.1 / 2a Wtg ,61 dai//�.y /f �i /l CI�rS 9rJCf wrKc�cwS 9�'C G'�'OS�cr . Let,xo/(2 176- f rrt� wi!/ -6ti�w 6.2 ROBIN T. HARRISON, P.E. SENIOR CONSULTANT r °� i'.p. ox6.42, Son Dima8 CA01173 (213)921-1213 e'_ S/ e(/3 W. r s; Aic S. o69 'Rev-le 're fhoc' . PCJW We* c 4"(6" oil griseju46e ft+Qv9 /N or ��'��`}f�•= ��r `Dc.fc%c�rS tt7 fd SSu �.Nnq �N�r� � N� �uirrs� 7� GdH 4 � r`i►� H �rr5 L` 1�,�5 � 15 ���' �� Grg, �' �Susnirr� .�vrr/ /Oo rri0 �of-cyc• /°5 qtr �,.0 r'� Ida. ,i . 0 the undersigned live or work within 300 feet of the boundaries of Allied Suzuki at 60 Be 9th St. in Upland. We have not been subjected to high or extreme noise levels or experienced a nuisance " from Allied customers or employees. We feel they have been an! asset to our community.. NAME 1.X&I . 60 r� Cea Q -7a.. a/ ADDRESS �K PHONE # i wp .. VVASN+gb la to iVN•T t- IN w&w r, Co. � 8 lJ 90 PEABO F O UMP CO 201 N. First Ave. 985 -7217 10. PEABODY FLOWAY UMP Co. 201 N. First Ave. 986• -7217 - '--.__ 'NTEA CDMMUN i (LENSED NURSES flEGISiRPiAGENCYi �7 11.( %_ ,Z -._ \ A— , /,/ -Mi /7 /`sf "-- f�l.G �•` .y(�,S,Li_?_ {�- a...__..._.:= C /.. ..f ✓�..'__� �. -. ��.c.:s- �.•+_Lr-(r r! ' 13. OMA44, Ca..1SJt. -Q -- - - -- - .._._ Zo — 9 p1 -s�,pi 'ZWVs C�Gn Lthriti� _, ' V_ C?yiYtn �2_�,�tUllc• 169 ` Wo the undersigned live or work within 300 f .ot of the boundaries of Allied Suzuki at 60 E, 9th St. in Upland, We have not beer. subjected to high or extreme noise levels or o-Nperienned a nuisance i from Allied customers or employees, We Teel they have been an asGot to our community. NAME 1 `. ADDRESS PHONE # (•�. 1 is -� % Lf a[Y' j} �• n, n. p /l " STN r'.�n /r -•., a) t�` .d � h%C r S `� I 3 adl C' he 9. ✓ (/ 10, J : C_ Ila �- 1 z. 13. is We the undersignad Live or work within 300 feet of the boundaries of Allied Suzuki at 60 E. 9th St. in Upland. We have not been subjected to high or extreme noise levels or experienced a nuisance, " from Allied customorn .or employees. We feel they have been an asset to our community. i MAKE ADDRESS PHONE # ?; -Al ..�9 Y11 //Y 67 _ E . I I ,' �.. _ '• rc_GKz k . f ���-x. 157 � / � C c�R_ - -• -_ '- Ei.. /Z, (4 '1 ��i,.I CX�.• l •� 8. , ;i •1 1 4v 15. i,. 16.. 0 ti 1 G�C�IJ�t../^C.�y �vv � / /��, vv`�LGj ✓L' ^�•.i•t -t..cx [r,'SiS�LLG� r.G 67 C ?",GAG2 7�> I G%i.. t/� (�til✓��' !�L!'� � y "t_ /cam ���• L'�- .I�G� �� L� _ I y,.fitZGPiL' .c.- SuX' yer lot P,%ItfcLnm beet �h�rA�CC i S a I a �.it C. �Ye the undersigned reside An Rancho Cucamonga and are custom Allied Suzulzi. We agree that they will ers of be an asset to our new city and that the management and omployeos of the company prevent a favor - rAble climate for motorcyclists, their friends and families. Since they are now .%'XperiZncinc a severe financial hardship I ocation we ur,;e the Rancho them to quickly proceed Planning Commission ttpiallowsent proceed with their proposed building program. NAB ADDRESS z. • 3.� p d =_ PH ONE , tk �c`— jl' ✓1f`' _._.11u;�Y�� _.ate y�.%r 1�ChcrcS Cq Igo kph 7. ._- �........ `c_1• ...... _`DID //i _ i I We the undersigned reside in Ran ho Cucamonga and are customers of Allied Suzuki. We agree that they will be an asset to our new city and that the management and employees of the company present a favor'* able climate for motorcyclists$ their friends and families, Since they are now experiencing a severe financial hardship at their present location we urge the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to allow them to quickly proceed with their proposed building program. NAME n on r AD..I;1,.w PiiuNE # `,GC� 4; u 11 . 5, 60 7 9, 13, �4. 15..; f We the undersigned .reside in Rancho Cucamonga and are customers of Allied Suzuki. we agree that they will be an asset to our new city and that the management and employees of the company present a favor - able climate for motorcyclists, their friends and families. Since they are now experiencing a severe financial hardship at their.present location we urge the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to allow them to quickly proceed with their proposed building program. NAME WDRESS PHONE 2. , rl - - G. E. 9. f 0 We the undersigned reside in Rancho Cucamonga and are customers of Allied Suzuki. We agree that they will be an asset to our new city and that the management and employees of the company present a, favor- able climate for motorcyclists., their friends and families. Since they are now experiencing a severe financial hardship at their present location we urge the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to allcw them to quickly proceed with their proposed building program. 3. 4 5 Or NAME y ' ADDRESS PHONE # <S 71.5 f(� r�5�✓���- T 7 �4 f c 7. 9. d/4Q> -� �_ .�- she._.. �_ f�"7•. � l? 2M31 70 ,r r �• !« It, i 0 Upland Chamber of Commerce 888 W. FOOTHILL BLVD. • UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786 (714) 982.8816 Herman Remple, Chairman Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 June 22, 1978 Dear Chairman Remple and Members of the Planning commission: This letter is in regards to Allied Motorcycle'at 60 East Ninth Street, Upland. W*_• heard from the owner, Bob Packer, that he is planning to move to Rancho Cucamonga; but questions were being raised about the noise level of his business. As you probably know, the City of Upland is also concerned about keeping noise at a minimum. Allied Motorcycle has been in our City for eight years now, operating in the town center, and up to this time there have been no noise problems or any complaints from residents or merchants. T am sure that they would be an asset to your city, and would give you no problems with noise. We will be sorry to lose them from Upland. Sincerely, Tony Malone Executive Vice President b5 ,Y- W F`ry Z4. +Y DATE: T0: FROM: SUBJECT: June 28, 1978 Planning Commission Director of Community Development Rancho Cucamonga General Plan - Sketch P17an #4 Mr. John 'Blayney, the General Plan consultant, will be at the Planning Commission to present Sketch Plan #4, which takes into consideration all the previous input, relative to all the other sketch plans for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Planning Commission should focus upon the key elements of Sketch Plan #4 and determine whether this fourth proposal addresses all, the key issues which have been discussed at previous meetings, and most notably those issues or questions' listed in the City Manager's memo of May 26, 1978. If the Planning Commission feels that Sketch Plan #4 ade- quately addresses all these issues, a date should be set for a public hearing at which time additional public input may be taken and a recommendation may be formulated for submittal to the City Council. If not, some time frame should be established• for any additional meetings necessary to reach the point of a public hearing. Respectfully submitted, 5ack Lam' 'Community Development Director ra, ' M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council Planning Commission FROM: Lauren M. Wasserma�� City Manager - .74 SUBJECT: Joint Meeting on General Plan 0 DATE: May 25, 1978 As you are aware, a joint City Council - Planning Commission mecting.has been scheduled for WEDNESDAY. MAY 31, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICE OUILDING. We have reviewed the various alternatives prepared by John Blayney. These alternatives represented a visual compilation of the ideas discussed at our all -day General Plan Community Forum scheduled in April. If we are to stay on schedule (or even close to our original schedule), it is essential that we begin focusi ig our ideas in order to provide Mr. Blayney with specific direction concerning the "final" document which will be used as the basis for our Gene.-at Plan hearings, which are now scheduled to begin June 28, 1978. It is,therefore, suggested that the Commission and City Council should begin stating its specific likes and dislikes concerning the three alternative proposals which were prepared by Mr. Blayney. There is still an opportunity for citizen input. in fact, input should be encouraged. However, it is also important that the City Council and Planning Commission begin to evaluate the citizen input and provide specific direction to Mr. Blayney. From our point of view, the primary issues to be resolveo include at least the following: I. Amount of land to be preserved for industrial development. 2. Density and development standards for Etiwanda. 3. Feasibility (both practical and economic) of retaining vacant land for permanent open space in Alta Loma. 4. Potential alternative sites for future commercial — regional shopping areas. The Commission may wish to reserve all three of the sites identified on each of the alternatives presented by Mr. Blayney. 4•r. Y V P. �r E City Council - Planning Commission May 26, 1978 Page Two V S. Population trends. What should be the City's ultimate population? 6. Commitment to preserve open space areas. 7. Location of other ccr.rical projects, particularly along Foothill Boulevard and other major thoroughfares. 8. The degree to which the separate identities of the Tri- Community areas may be preserved. 0 always save the best issues for the last!). It may be that the different develop- ment standards for each geographical area will do the.most to preserve the separate identities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda. Naturally, there are many more issues to be resolved before the final document is prepared. However, the above list represents the most significant issues (in our view) which must be resolved in order for John Blayney to prepare our recommended General Plan for Public Hearing. ' LMW : baa cc_ Jack Lam' John Blayney Tommy Stephens Lauren Wasserman File n F', Cam. 6cqr� 1r Ae. ?rancho Gucamof�a Chamber of Commerce 8354 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 TELEPHONE: 714.887 -1012 June 6, 1978 Iauren M. Wasserman, City Manager City of Rancho Cucaronga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Lauren: Thank you very much for your progress report on the proposed sign Ordinance of May 25, 1978. In response to your letter and with the direction of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce I am taking this oppor- tunity to send the following suggestions to you for forwarding to the Planning Commissioners as an aid in their deliberations. In general we are in agreement with the structure and wording of the South Pasadena sign ordinance that was sent to you by Arden Berg of California Sign Users Council. We suggest that instead of designating signing according to specific zoning that designations be made simply to commercial or industrial without any furthur detail. G We believe the manner in which sign size is designated in South Pasadena's ordinance is good, concise and is very much in line with the proposed ordinance. It is our feeling that the South Pasadena ordinance sectioa entitled EXCEPTIONS should be included in the Rancho Cucamonga ordinance as it is important that there be a method by which owners of commercial establishments with unique sign problems can apply for special consideration. We feel that there should be no furthur bill boards allowed to be constructed a within the city limits and will assist the commission in taking this stand both as to the abatement process on bill boards and furthur construction. Finally, we feel strongly that the South Pasadena'orlinance is correctly written in its section on NON- CONFORMING SIGNS. Thank you for your cooperation and the cooperation of the Planning Com- ` missioners in this matter. ely yours) , (i Devi ump ey Exec. Director May 31, 1978 , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL — PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Special Joint Meeting A special joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Cotmnission was held at the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wed - nesday. May 31, 1978. Present: Councilmen Phillip Schlosser, Jon Mikels, Charles West, and Mayor James C. Frost. Planning Commissioners Peter Tolstoy, Jorge Garcia, Richard Dahl, and Chairman Herman Rempel. Absent: Laura Jones and Michael Palombo. Palombo had been excused by Mayor Frost to represent the Cit; at another meeting. Mr. Palombo did arrive at the meeting at 9 :00 p.m. The City Council and Planning Commission met in joint session to discuss the various alternatives proposed in the city's General Plan. The city's consultant, Mr. John Blayney, reviewed the various alternatives. Following extensive dis- cussion, the meeting was adjourned at 12 :30 a.m. on June 1, 1978. Adjournment: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by West to adjourn the meeting to June 7, 1973. Motion unanimously carried. ?lotion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded bir Garcia to adjourn to June. 14, 1978. Motion unanimously carried. Respectfully submitted, Lauren M..Wasserman A 0 M E M D R A N D U M DATE: May 24, 1978 TO Planning Commission FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Environmental Report Proposed School Site - 8968 Archibald The Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposed rehabilitation of the existing :lementary school site at 8968 Archibald. It is proposed that the building be used to accomrodate a private school including a Day Care Centar and grades K through 8. The Committee has recommended that a focused EIR be prepared for the projeC:. It is recommended that the report deal.with traffic, noise, and compati- bility of land use with adjacent developments. In addition, it is recomr--n- ded that a report be submitted from a structural engineer regarding the suitability of the building for use as a school site. This recommendat.on Is based upon the fact that the forcer elementary school site has been vacant for several years and may not be structurally sound. The present zoning for the property is MR which is restricted manufacturing.. The developers have completed a portion of the planned improvements, notably the replacement of the roof and other minor changes. Building permits have not been issued for major improvements. l.MW : baa PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION CORM (PEDF) ; ` 4rt,DATE FILED: May 24,1978 ��a"x'.►"If Za.+� M R:'- fa':;Ca+�w. `:';'!'Introduction: The questions in this form are designpli to obtain enough data abou; your proposed project and your project site to allow the staff and /or ERC'.to Fr adeq, -ately assess your project. B takin the time to full respond to the ug esti _f�,- I.below, you can help_ reduce the process na t me or vour project. ou may so i.S, include any additional informatlan which you believe is pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary. ol APPLICANT'S NAME: BARBARA P. SALYER TYPE OF PROJECT OR ACTION: REHABILITATION OF EXISTING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL '- PROJECT LOCATION (GENERAL & 1.041): 8968 ARCHIBALD AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA =.4 1! 4 iSITE INDEX NUMBER: CLASSIFICATION: MR GENERAL PLAN RECOMMENDATION: "If there Is an existing EIR on your project site, gire the name and the date it was written. NOT KNOWN Alf this is a request for Categorical Exemption, indicate here A!id give exemption class: YES. ,' Project Description i; - I,I.• describe your proposed project in as much detail as possible. Identify the project's specific components and the reasons for proposing the project at. this time. Alsq.:discuss the specific issues identified pelow, where applicable. vi THE BUILDINGS NOW EXIST AND WAS A PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WE INTCND r0 REHABILITATE THE BUILONGS AS REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. OUR PRIVATE i ..SCHOOL OPERATI011 WILL INCLUDE A DAY CARE CENTER, A KINDERGARTEN AND GRADES ONE THRU EIGHT. l (r a. Describe any product(s) that will be manufactured or processed by your project and, the market it (they)will serve. NONE T^��rj��'�'tro"'R'C�`„`'�,,��r1, �.. ... -:;7 4i.4�:,�.� �[VUBS.�.,. —. /�JSIe� �ir..C._�Cf"s.':,y.-• .,•yr_ PEOF t 1 b Indicate* the market that your units are designed to serve. NONE i c.., Discuss any phasing of your project on the indicated site or in relation to a larger project (if one exists). NONE s: d. Sire of Parcel (s) (acres) 4.3 ACRES BLK 171 PARCEL 15 Assessors Parcel Numbcr(s) Total number of units NONE Total number of lots ONE Square footage of all structures •17,750 SQ. FT Height of proposed structures EXISTING ABOUT 25 FT. ONE S'P'RY Number of parking spaces �5� . .,.o.,.•_ Area of paved surface- APPROX.: 35.000 SQ. FT. OF EXISTING PAVING Total disturbed area r` '• Street(s)fthat provide access ARCHIBALD AVE w e. Air Quality Information: t1 Number and type of vehiclzs associated with completed project .'. _ APP_ROX__14_CARS FOR TEACHERS AND STAFF. Odors emanating from project (type) NONE Housing Tracts or Subdivisions Type of Units planned Number of units of each ty '1e Average floor area (living space) of each type :a. Average Number of Vehicles per Ur*lit �` :; 2 d� I 4� jy1 is "S P3DF .Ho +. Commercial and Tnd strial Projects- " " Types of emissions and sources assoclilted with.projer r * Electricity to be consumed by completed project in wh /(n?nth 20.000 {" i ,. Natural gas to be consumed by completed project in thei'Aps /,month__,, rrl.;;: v ; `± 1000 cubic feet /month 7 Any other fuel sources (and amounts) to be consumed by completed'. project �1 2. Describe the site as thoroughly as possible. The following factors should be ' 'considered: a. Describe the type of vegetation and the percentage of the site that'.it covers. List the animals that you have seen or that are known to ccc4r 4 on the site. i• N 1'E WEEDS ARE GROWING IN UNPAVED AREAS. THE MAIN BUILDING HAS MANY ilk, BUSHES AND THERE ARE SOME TREES ON TI.E SITE. THE ONLY ANIMAL LIFE VISIBLE INCLUDES GOPHERS AND COTTON TAILS PLUS BIROLIFE. a� a� SV iI,. f, Ilnd b. •J Describe the topography (i.e, slopes, landformst landscape) of the site. Any data on soils and geology would also be helpful. THE TOPOGRAPIIY IS RELATIVELY FLAT WITH ABOUT 3T.. GRARO14 NORTH TO SOUTH. SOIL IS SILTY SAND WITH LITTLE CLAY, AND GRAVEL. i ,. rr e., Discuss any stream channels or 4:roded areas on the site. NONE 3 4- I. ..;t. `d. Describe any imgr rents on the site. y �• THE MAIN BUILDING IS 13.250 SQ. FT. PLUS COVERED ARCADES. THE ANNEX _ r11jj'a BUILDING IS 2000 SQ. FT. THE KINDERGARTEN AND DAY CARE BUILDING IS 2500 SQ. FT. 'THERE ARE SOME STORAGE AND PARKING SHEDS ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ABOUT }� CL 2000.SQ- F7. t,. !.; �_-,;,� •;: , e. if your project site 1s located within a known archaeological recourse area, you.may be required to provide documentation on the archaeological potential of your site. The ERC will determine if such documentation is necessary, and may continue your project until the necessary study is performed. You may save time in the processing of your project by .,: obtaining a letter ar study an the archaeological status of your site prior to the ERC meeting. You may contact the San Bernardino County ?'�a•:.;. 4useum (Or'. Gerald Smith, 714/825 -4825) to obtain a form for conducting this study and /or a list of Qualified organizations and individuals who perform this service. T`} f. Describe the agencies that are or will be providing. the following services S:. '. ',.;�;:�::•,� or utilities. Indicate whether these services are already provided to A the project site. { •: t. +: r;j'L•. "Electricity S C EDISON: EXISTING TEMPORARY POWER Gas_ SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS CO.: EXISTING SERVICE t :.;. Water FUCAMONGA COUNTY MATER DISTRICT, EXISTING SERVICE SeY!ag8.(115pOShc CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT. 1.. • rck v. !� „ >'t ,;..; .t;fuse_Disposal PRIVATE COLLECTION HAYDEN CO. a3 >•,• „;!.'.. . Schools _NOT APPLICABLE - -- _. --- -- :r . { {'!' • `''ftre- Protection FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT -_ Y , .i r; py l s. FLU?* i 3. Describe the land uses on the adjacent land in each direction.• Note any major or important natural or man -made features on the 4djacgnt land; for example.najor highways, stream channels, or other'nota le features. Where ., possible, provide a vicinity map showing the project site's re]ati6nship to these features. h% I'NORTH SI DE: , RESIDENTIAL USE t } J WISI 5101: R1!,I1)INIIAL Ua AND SOMI INDUSIRIAI Usi SOUTH SIDE VACANT_ , MR ZONE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVE: RESIDENTIAL, � y�. I Ix t 'I Describe the site alterations that will be produced by your proposed project. For instance, describe topographic changes, the percentAge of the site that ,i I will be graded, stow. flows that will have to be channelized. and other changes. Also, indicate any new services or utilities that will be required as a result of your project. NO GRADING WORK OTHER THAN TO REMOVF SOME FILL AT WEST'�'hDE OF MAIN BUILDING WHICH WAS FILLED BY PREVIOUS OWNER. THE EXISTING.SEPTIC TANK WILL BE. 1 ABANDONED;AND CONNECTION MADE TO PUBLIC SEWER. ON SITE FIRE HYDRANTS +;ILL BE ADDED AS REQUIRED. Il'�1iiT. G.,,:Identify any other agencies that you have contacted during the processing of is -your project. Please include copies of correspondence, with any state, federal or other local agencies or departments where the proposed project is discussed. iq : -SEE fNCLOSI.D LETTER rROM CUCAMONGA COUNTY. WATER DISTRICT. 1:• ,.t ' 5 00) Py CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER 'DISTRICT 2141 SAN nVVIAIIUIMO tlD. •'�!'.t 714N dA. CALIF. AIN1, P n' U:eI 733 CHARLES T. VATH. 1',e -Wewt March 28, 1978 San Bernardino County Environmental 11nprovement Agency 1111 East Mill Street, Building 1 San Bernardino, California 92415 Re: Property located at 8968 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga Gentlemen: - 1'iee.prr,:drnl ARTHUR H. RRIDOX S,eeetd'w. GrwenU fl a""r LLOYP. W. MICHAEL 1 pirertnn FRANK LE5INSKY ROBERT NE,RBIT GALEn ROYER The above mentioned property has both water and sewer service available for connection. Said services are located in the street fronting said property. Adequate waterline and water storage Capacity exists and will exist to serve the above referenced property at the tinge of occupancy. In addition, the :xeweer ::yat:e:rn r,�lp:u::i.l:y i:: e:uCf.i<:.irenl. l:o nervy said Property. This capacity parLains Lo availability of sews rs duly and ; pat to be int.orpreLed as a quaranLec, to sewer treatment capacity. The said property is entitle -a to water and sower service Irolu this Die;Lric:t, and said SOI-V.iCe i'; Subject Lo p3pel.ine extension policies, rules, regulations anti rat4 ordinances of this District. Yours Lrulyr CUC;AMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 1�A77 a / 4��-,L� ,;I:aln -.; 11. Cline, Jr. principal Engineering Aide J11C:bf AADL AN EXPANDED INTI.AL STUOV I. PROJECT '., The rehabiPi:tat.ion o6 the Otd Cucamonga Sch0ot House, Located at 8968 Axch.ibatd Avenue, into a pn.ivate schoot. CONDITIONAL CONCERNS RELATLO TO THE PROJECT There axe Sour areas o6 concern as expxessed by the City Manager, Ma. Wa66exman: 11) compatab.it.ity with adajacent aneas, (2) question o6 noise, (3) question o6 tka66.ic, and (4) btnuctuhat satiety '06 the bu- itd.ings. COMPATABILITY Thene is no con6t.ict at eompatab.EZ.ity boa the 6ottow.ing 11 xeaaons: 1. On the North side o6 the project there axe re6-i.dent.iaZ homes owned by d.i66exent .ind.iv.iduaZ6. The ;:•xobab.ittty o6 a£t the home owners setting the.ix paxeeZa ,xt the same time to a manu6actunaZ dcveZopex axe sZ.im. Mks. Gwenc'otyn Potter, who has two paiceets, con6.E6ting o6 3 acs es with 5 xentaZs, has no intentions o6 convext.ing hex irropexty into .indu6txy. She made this statement to Mxs. Simone T. Payne over the phone June 6, 1978. 2. On the South side o6 the project Vanguard Constxuct.ion is developing an Industn.iaZ Paxk. The stauctuxes, as ptanned, axe not ,ineompa.tabZe with a px.ivate 6choot. The 6.i4bt 208' w.itZ be parking spaces 6or the Industx.iat Paxk. Vanguard pZans to put up a stone watt 6enee to 6eparate the paxk.ing tot and the eehooZ. Fox the next 700 or so beet, Vanguard pZan6 to bu.itd storage units, ud:.ich axe ar exceZtent bub6ex Sox a px.ivate 6chooZ. These pZan6 wexe xeveated to Miss Satyex and Mrs. Payne by Mx. George M.itter o6 Vanguard Constxuct.ion. Mx..Voug Payne agreed that this bu66ex would be euitabY.e Sax the project. 11 NOISE Thete ate two coneetnc netated to noise: (1) noise 6rom the rta.ittoad on 8th Street, and (2) noise Atom the tra66.ia on Artchibatd. 1. Raittoad Noise There is a ta.ittoad 310 beet away Atom the north side o6 the. schoot'6 property tine. It is o6 concern whether the ta.itnoad woutd caseate noise which woutd be dett.imentat to the health and wett being o6 the studenta. In an In6utma.t.ion Repott, dated 10/5/76, ptopo6ed by Mc Cutchan 5 Associates, Inc., and Prepared by .San Bernardino County Env.ironmentat Improvement Agency - Env.itonmenta? Anaty6.i6 Division, tt addrtes6ed the question o6 ra.itroad noise. It stated on page 7 oA said repott: The expected CNEL is about 65 dBA at 100 beet 6rom the tracks and about 60 dBA at 200 beet 6tom the ttack6. CNEL vatues o6 60 dBA and oven are o6 coneetn in Cat.i6o4n.ia. . . x. Since the school. is over 300 beet away Atom the ka.iLtoad .`�. tracks, the dBA .is tower than 55, which means the noise el Atom the ta.ittoad w.itt not be dett.imentat to the pto j e. T.. Page 2 3. On the West side o6 the pAoject there is a ke6.idence on a 2.5 acne parcel which is owned by Mt. .I.im.inex. On May 30, 1978, Ma. J•iminez stated to Mts. Vmone Payne that he did ptan some zott o6 tight .indubtry in the , F - 6.-,% 6utute. There were sevetat temed.iat measures Miss Salyer and •"' Mts. Payne eoutd take: The obv. °ous is to Leave the - Day Carte Centex Bu.itd.ing as .is, neat .the. N.W. boundary, and ash Got a cond.iti.onat apptovat, but they betec.ted '- '•''' not to .take 'the chance o6 .incompatab.it.ity in the 6utute, and to move sn.id bu.itd.ing etosea to the etu6ter o6 main bu.itd.ings. With this decision o6 moving the Day Cate Bu.itd.ing away Atom the west boundarty; there is no 6utthet con6t.ict. NOISE Thete ate two coneetnc netated to noise: (1) noise 6rom the rta.ittoad on 8th Street, and (2) noise Atom the tra66.ia on Artchibatd. 1. Raittoad Noise There is a ta.ittoad 310 beet away Atom the north side o6 the. schoot'6 property tine. It is o6 concern whether the ta.itnoad woutd caseate noise which woutd be dett.imentat to the health and wett being o6 the studenta. In an In6utma.t.ion Repott, dated 10/5/76, ptopo6ed by Mc Cutchan 5 Associates, Inc., and Prepared by .San Bernardino County Env.ironmentat Improvement Agency - Env.itonmenta? Anaty6.i6 Division, tt addrtes6ed the question o6 ra.itroad noise. It stated on page 7 oA said repott: The expected CNEL is about 65 dBA at 100 beet 6rom the tracks and about 60 dBA at 200 beet 6tom the ttack6. CNEL vatues o6 60 dBA and oven are o6 coneetn in Cat.i6o4n.ia. . . x. Since the school. is over 300 beet away Atom the ka.iLtoad .`�. tracks, the dBA .is tower than 55, which means the noise el Atom the ta.ittoad w.itt not be dett.imentat to the pto j e. T.. Page 3 2. Tha66ie noise Tna66ic noise is o6 concenn. Using the noise- .impact equation, (bee. Appendix A) Thomas Rogenb, o6 Envinonmentat Analysis, San Behnandino County, determined that the noise level 6nom the on going tn.a66ie is 68 dBA. This is high, eapeeiat °_y when you eonsidek that the San Beanartdi.no County cnviaonmental improvement Agency Planning Depaatment, has determined that edviat.ionat 6aeilitie4 should be in a very sensitive land use, and 'hat the dBA level bon sensitive land usage should be 45. Upon learning this Miss Salyer and Mns. Payne were deeply coneenned as what to do to remediate the situation. Miss Salyer contacted DA. Bradley L. Billings; Director o6 Audiology, at the Audiology Centers o6 Redlands, who has done research 6or the San Bernardino Planning Commision. As an expert in audiology, Dr. Bitt.i.nye, came to Rancho Cucamonga to view the school buitdiag and he belt that i6 certain remedial meabuheb were 6otlowed that the buildings would be mane than adequate 6or providing a positive teaming envi.honment Jon the chitdren. The aemed.iat meabures that he suggested will be implemented by Miss Salyer and Mrs. Payne. Dr. Billings made the 6otlow.ing suggestions: 1. plant shrub6 along the north and east property tine to mu66te sounds o6 on going tra6fiic. 2. insulate watts properly to mu661-e sound:. 3. he stated that the 6aet we plan to carpet Aooms and install airr_onditioning units, which means windows will be inept closed, will �. more than adequately lowers the noise tevet. Miss Salyer also called DA. Bran Dthgan, Pro6esbor o6 Botany, with a specialization Zn envinonmental '. 1lortiCutture tom . the University o6 Cati60rnia 0.t 6 Dab.is, to ash him what plants and shrubs would best _s is 14 X dp � b.-'7W h. Y�i Page 4 abaoxb.Bound. ft. Dehgan suggested that ptants absoLb 6xom :• -10 dHA and he woutd recommend the 6ottowing shrubs ' to maximiie aoutd abaoxbtion: Hakea, Hakea Sattci6oti.a, Otei FoZid, Myxtua Communis, i'xunua, and Dodoned. Our tandacape arehZtect, Mn.. Oxvitte Sheets wiZt- aeteet one o6 thae recommended shrubs to ptant on three boot centers along the e.aat tine and on no move +} . than 5 boot centen.e along the naxth Line. 06 6uxthex cona.ideaation is that Centxat Etementdxy Sehoot: and Vattev Vista F.tementany Sehoot at 7955 and 7727 reapeetivety axe bath Located on Arehibatd. TRAFFIC u There axe two coneexns ketated to txa66ie: 111 .trab6ic and the 6a6ety o6 the ch.itdxen, and (2) the tha66ic a66ects caused by thv. existence o6 the said phivate &choot, now to be re6erhed to as Wittows Sehoot. 1•. Txa66ic and the aa6ety o6 the ehitdxen To aaaure the zgcat environment poaaibte 6ox `.he atudentz the l6attewing remediat measures w.i.tt be taker.: 1, ehitdxen Witt be dropped o66 and picked up at a designated spot welt with -in the noxth part 06 the packing tot. 2. There Witt be no pe.destaian watk -in gate on the 6ront o6 the sehoot, ao that paxents wilt not be ;tempted to caretessty deposit ehitdren outside o6 the gate. The o:.ty access 6rom AxchibaQd Witt be the dxi jeway gate. 3. The younger ehitdren Witt be 6urtheh away 6rom the tra66ic. The 6A.rat grade and 6econd grade w.itt be housed in the pax N.W. etassxoom -j. The Day Care Center and th? Kindexganten Witt «, r}°?• - be ptaeed welt e6 the Annex (Abaemb.Cy Buitding), s�' Page 5 ? and their ptay at.ea witt be 6enced o66 and a 6aeing the opposite direction o6 An.eh.ibtad. 4. The main ptaygound is 6uathet we-at and aa6ety away 6rom Atchibatd. Mn. Rogets di.d state, that o6 coneexn, is tta66ie 2. The txa66ic a66ects caused by the existence o6 6tow and exiting onto Archibatd Gram Wittows Schoot. Wittows Schoot on AAchibatd to tevcated by Thomas Rogers o6 Envixonmentat Anatysia, the votume o6 cats on Axehibatd ate onty at 112 tta66ie to Wittowa wilt enter the parking tot; there' capacity. The Tta66ic Division o6 the TAanspox.tation Depattment, stated to Mx. Rogers, that Axehibatd has a capacity design o6 40,000 vehietee at tevet D. there witt be no te6t hand tutna so that att exiting On Wednesday, Match 8, 1978, the ADT was 9,820 nort an h bound d 9,660 south bound, making the • carat ADT .19,480, which is below the 40,000 capacity. :+ The totat number o6 ehitdxen WitloWa witt 'Uahe witt be 250 ptus 30 maximum pet hours bon. 8 hou-'ca :` I Son the Reading Ctinie. The maximum posaibte o6 06 ptima&y eoncexn has been the structuxat adequacy o6 490 cans would not atten the txa66ie volume au66icientty to menit concern. Mn. Rogets di.d state, that o6 coneexn, is tta66ie 6tow and exiting onto Archibatd Gram Wittows Schoot. Remedtat m,.asures to be taken ate as 6ottows: Att tta66ie to Wittowa wilt enter the parking tot; there' witt be no o6b street packing, and upon exiting there witt be no te6t hand tutna so that att exiting t4a66ie Witt 6tow mane smoothly down Atchibatd. STRUCTURAL SAFETY :` I 06 ptima&y eoncexn has been the structuxat adequacy o6 the sehoot buitdings. This ptobtem was 6ixa.t addAesaed on Febtuaty 17, 1978 (see Appendix 8): At this time Mx. Jack RoseS+.ough, Ch.ie6 Sttuc.tuxat 7nspectox, San Bernardino County, and Mx. Frank Van. Pett, Regional '. Supetvisox, Jan Bexnaxdino County, OntaAio 066iee, were Page b present at the Archibatd site and made spec.i6ic recommendations, concerning the n ehabititatdon pnoJect. These recommendations were then Lmptemented by Mt.`r.ed Ashton, 6trueturat eng.i.neer and Mr: Fred t° Mc Dowett, Architect. The 6inat. buitding and btructurat ptans wene submitted some weeks, ago to the o66ice o6 Alit. Van Pent-boa appnovat. Miss Sa.Cyex spoke with Alit. Van Pett on June 7, and tearned that att the ptans have been approved with no corrections made to them. III. THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT !jif-towa Sehoo•t witt be a positive asset bon the up growing community o6 Rancho Cucamonga, not onty because there is a dine need bon 6ehodZ6, but because it promises to be an outstanding academic 6 shoot. wittows is a school which promises to devetop the 6uttest po•tentiat o6 every child, and the cneaton.e o6 this educationat community beet 60 con6tdent that they can accomplish this, that they guaaan.tee an educatisn, bo)t each chitd. wittows is re6erred to as an educaticnat community because it watt meet the needs o6 many members 06 our community: 1. wttlows witt meet the needs o6 the working parents because it wilt provide comptete day pare 6nom 6:00 am - 6:00 pm. bon al.t students. 2. witt.ow6 wilt meet the dead --mic needs o6 the children enrolted, by stressing academic excettence and by prcoviding a positive environment 6-tee vandatiz!% and nudenes6. 3. wittows witt have a Reading Ctin %c, which fsan truty remediate reading de6ic•ienc.ies . The Reading Ctinic Witt be based on the RITES reading program, 1 ±hick was devetoped by Simone T. Payne, and won state n.ecciinitton in 1974 at the Ca.ti6onnia Reading A66ocation in Fresno. 4. wittows Reading Ctinie watt atso provide Speed Reading Ctas6es in the eventing bon those who- arc .r ;j. F, P - Page. 7 aceomptished neadens and who want to pick up theirs speed. This witt be o6„ened at a mane neasonabt e cost than some o6 the move poputan Speed Reading Paognams. 5. WitZows Reading Ctinie i6 at6o punsuing VA appnovaC so that memben6 o6 oun community with Limited 6inaneiat means can bene6it 6nom oun seLvice6. 6. w.ittows witt atso meet euuunat. needs. Dancing, music, drama, and phys.i.ca£ 6itness ctaaees wit.t be avai.tabte to memben.s'06 oun community. AU in att it is 6ett that Wittows witt provide a positive. and.beneSiciat senviee to the community o6 Rancho Cucamonga. WA IlUk A it Impact.S. 2, The following.equationS A�,'o�, 4 apply�,to tho.calculation Of poise- imPaC,�, .5 Alp levels' from variour, sources 6' 49.36514 Ldn(trains) .91 10 109.10 1 (2.,0832 ADT). 4 9 365141,: ., 1 1L'97 10 loglo chi �T, 82.9897 .lo` �,locj (0 - 0868 ADT) "Al. . 3. L (truc 10 dri It 41. . I v 4 UCIZ s •-"locjlo ()A+ 4. L (autos a"d tr 10, 1 o cj 0 1 (d is tannQ) (1007 S. Ld Where: ADT ;,verage. nail; Tra f f ic count 2 �7, 4y-* 1141 Distali•c in L I)Ily-14ight Avurst9Ud MO Is' T.ovel in c1B. .7 units dn 0 3) oil 44N z4 d� hours I Cf JA 37 t;I, E VA PI .,07t s , 3;4tt 43 , t" I I.A 4 4 AAA I I 49 W. ... .. .. I 50 j V, Fill I, 4p? T '56 I .1 r_ �1 ♦' �.CRILEY AND McD0ME,L'L rr YiY(i �i AR.CH - ITECTS & ASSOCIAT'E'S "414 '+ 1101 NOETN INDIAN 1141141, I IOUIIVAID • CIA It M ON', .•CAIIPONNIA '117. ( 1 -3112 1 P. Salyer February 17rr1978 -{5�' TO: Barbara Y • 6242 Amber Wood Drive ` ''f;.7 y,. •,,fylxi l Alta Loma, California 91701 L yu ' P.H., February 16., 19j8 RE: Site, inspection at 8968 Archibald Avenue, .1 30 .ti 4 Present: Mr. Jack Rosebniugh, Chief Structural inspector, San Bernardino;County.•, Hr. Frank Van Pelt, Regional Supervisor, San Bern. Co., OncarJa.Office ;; e Mr. Ken Belknap, General Contractor Architect and Lem Chlm'af Crlley and McOowelj' l't +" 1. The purpose of this meeting was to have the. Building Officials look at' nrSM'" the t- xisting structure and discuss the major requirements of.the re- ha ilitation 1•)ork for the proposed private school, Kindergarten through.a' ,'y• cc 1 Eight Grade. 2. Mr. Ashton, our Structural Engineer, who worked on the project. for Frank Kirnig back in 1972, will again be our Consultant on the presenC.r project. n s {K s 3• Ica class_ Mr. Van Pelt had some concern about the .heel joint at the typ ', d +r room eave detail. This problem wil l be addressed by Mr. Ashton: F . , :;... 4. The Officials were informed that all clay rile roofing will be removed and a composition shingle roof will be ins wiled. Ail of the interior n ,good lath and plaster ceilings will be, removed and suspended 2 x 4�g d.. acoustical file will be added. 1;? F I:. y t• 5. The existing high windowsat the arcade of south and north wing will bei; filled in with plaster., r 6. The glass transoms over arcade doors will be Filled with an 1-3/4 soli01 rnrp r1r LinP N'c �rlL� i•`l f' ��" •; 7. The arcade windows facing east of the middle section of building�eanYV,, ;1 rema in. 1d �" 8. The existing septic tank system can be used if we prove that it is oper 9 P possibility " c acing correctly. There is not as the present time; any po -• 1, 1 for future connectlarft •, connecting to the City sewer. but we will apply t . I now through Mr. Ken Hunter, acting City Manager of Rancho CUcamttnga, y y ;� 7 Y4`d V{ MCDOWeI i''. FWM /ck Cc: Mr. Jack .Rosebraugh r. I cc:, Mr. Fran R Van Pelt jt t1 F S.. Picasc reply to this munora_ndum within ten or ftfteen ,, days�i� you, A, have any d1$,�greemenl rwl [h th a st?Itcmrn�s ^ ' i� J}�tal k'� •Rt CNIEEY�/E. A.LA. INEOPO .`t •. 1. �•rRIDrW;,MtdOW tli'A� i.� Y Y, 4,: ORDINANCE NO. 28 1 �' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO SUPPLE14ENT AND IMPLEMENT THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1. GENERAL SEC. 1.1. intent and Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to supplement and implement the Subdivision Map Act. The provisions of this Ordinance are in- tended to control those matters permitted by the Subdivision Map Act to be prescribed by.local ordinance and not to republish those provisions of the Subdivision Map Act which are mandatory. All provisions of the Subdivision Map Act which are mandatory in nature are hereby incorporated by reference in this ordinance. SEC. 1.2. Definitions. For the purposes of this Ordinance,` all words and phrases used in this Ordinance which are defined in the Subdivision Map Act shall have the same meaning as in the Subdivision Map Act. Certain additional words and phrases used in this Ordinance are defined as follows: '. (a) "Advisory Agency" shall mean the City Engineer in case of parcel maps and lot line adjustments, and the Planning Commission in all other cases. (b) "Appeal Board" shall mean the Planning Commission of the City for any appeal from an action of the City Engineer. (c) "City Engineer" shall mean the City Engineer of the City and shall include his deputies. (d) "Final map" shall mean a map which is designed to be placed on record in the office of the County Recorder for any sub- - division creating five (5) or more lots, five (5) or more condomin- iums, or a community apartment project containing five (5) or more lots, except for those subdivisions which comply with the provis- ions of subsections (a), (b), (c), or (d) of Section 66426 of the Government Code. (e) "Government Code" shall mean the Government Code of the.State. If at any time any of the sections of the Government Code referred to in this ordinance are redesignated by a new number, such new number shall thereupon be deemed substituted for such old �K -1- 1 . . . number wherever the same appears in this ordinance. (f) "Lot" or "lots" are terms used to designate each sep- arate lot or parcel created or proposed to be created by the divis- ion of land. (g) "Parcel" or "parcels" are terms used to refer to the land proposed to be divided as it existed prior to such division of land. (h) "Parcel map" shall mean a map which is designed to be placed on record in the Office of the County Recorder for any sub- division creating four (4) or fewer lots or five (5) or more lots if the subdivision complies with the provisions of subsections (a), (b), (c), or (d) of Section 66426 of the Government Code. (i) "Person adversely affected" shall mean: (1) Any person owning or occupying real property any portion of which is located within the City; (2) Any public agency; and, (3) Any public utility. (j) "Recognized parcel" shall mean: (1) Any lot or parcel which was a separate lot or par- cel of record on December 1, 1977, as shown in the official records of the County Recorder; or, (2) Any lot or parcel which has been or is created after December•1, 1977, in accordance with State law or any applic- able City ordinance; or, (3) Any lot or parcel which at the time of annexation to the City is a separate lot or parcel of record, as shown in the official records of the County Recorder. (k) "Subdivision Map Act" shall mean Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, which pertains to the regulation of subdi- visions. iii "substandard lot" shall mean any lot which does not meet the minimum dimension or area requirements for the zone in which it is located and for which no variance has been obtained. In determining the minimum lot area or dimensions, the area of any easement which restricts the normal usage of the lot may be excluded. (m) "Tentative map" shall mean a map prepared for the pur- pose of showing the design of the proposed subdivision and the existing conditions in and around it. A tentative map need not be based upon an accurate or detailed field survey. -2- 0 (n) "Tentative parcel map" shall mean a tentative map for a proposed subdivision creating four (4) or fewer lots or five (5) or more lots which comply with the provisions of subsections (a), (b), (c), or (d) of Section 66426 of the Government Code. ' (o) "Tentative tract map" shall mean a tentative map for a proposed subdivision creating five (5) or more lots, five (5) or more condominiums, or a community apartment project containing five (5) or more lots, except for those subdivisions which comply with the provisions of subsections (a), (b), (c), or (d) of Section 66426 of the Government Code. (p) "Tract map" is a term which may be used as a synonym for the term "final map ". (q) "Unrecognized parcel" shall mean any lot or parcel which is not a recognized parcel. SEC. 1.3. Time. In all cases where this Ordinance or the Subdivision Map Act requires the performance of any act, including the holding of any hearing, by any employee, officer, board, agency, commission, or the Council within a specified period of time, such time may be ex- tended by mutual agreement between the subdivider and the employee, officer, board, agency, commission, or. the Council responsible for the performance of such act. SEC. 1.4. Reports on General Plai Any report as to conformity quired by reason of the provisions ment Code, may be made at the same the action taken by the officer or approve, conditionally approve, or SEC. 1.5. Services and Permits. No new City service City permit will be issued is an u,u.cuuynized parcel; by the Building Official f, if he finds such action is and safety. SEC. 1.6. Exclusions. i Conformance. to the General Plan, which is re- of Section 65402 of the Govern - time as, and included as part of, agency having the authority to disapprove the tentative map. or utilities shall be provided to, and no with respect to, any parcel or lot which provided, however, a permit may be issued ar z length of time as he shall determine necessary to protect the public health All portions of the recognized parcels proposed to be divided shall be included in and identified by number on each map required or permitted by the Subdivision Map Act or this Ordinance, except in -3- the following cases: (a) The present owner of an unrecognized parcel may file a map of that portion of the recognized parcel.which he owns and exclude the remainder of the recognized parcel if the present owner was not the subdivider at the time the unrecognized parcel was created; or, (b) The owner of an unrecognized parcel, who was the sub- divider at the time the unrecognized parcel was created, may file a map showing all portions of the previously recognized parcel which is not now a recognized parcel. (c) For the purposes of this section, any person who, at the time he acquired an unrecognized parcel, had actual or con- structive knowledge that the same was an unrecognized parcel shall be deemed a subdivider who created the unrecognized parcel. SEC. 1.7. Reports. Any report required or permitted by this Ordinance or the Subdivision Map Act shall be maintained as a public record by the City for five (5) years after the recordation or waiver of the map to which such report pertains. A copy of any such report shall be served on the subdivider at least three (3) days prior to any fur- ther action being taken with respect to the map to which the report pertains. SEC. 1.8. Evidence of Ownership Required at the Time of Filing Any Tentative, Parcel, or Final Map. The subdivider shall submit evidence as to the ownership of the land proposed to be divided. Such evidence may be in the form of a preliminary title report which is dated not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date on which the tentative, parcel, or final map is filed, or such evidence may be in any other form which is acceptable to the City Engineer. SEC 1.9. Improvement Plans. ;,A. improvement plan conforming in format and content to the standards of the City and the requirements of the City Engineer shall be furnished by the subdivider for all the required improve- ments for any division of land. No construction shall be commenced until the improvement plan has been approved by the City Engineer and until the subdivider has secured all the permits required for such work. Any improvement plan approved by the City Engineer, up- on the affixing of his signature thereon, shall become a public record of the City and shall be filed in the Office of the City Engineer. The Engineering Department may have approved improvement plans available for certain sections of the City which will be pro- -q- vided to subdividers for a fee as- established by resolution of the Council. The standards referred to in this section are contained in the Standard Specifications and Drawings on file in the Office of the City Clerk. SEC. 1.10. Waivers of Technical or Inadvertent Errors. The Council may waive the provisions of Section 66473 of the Government Code with respect to any technical or inadvertent error if the Council first makes a finding that such error does not materially affect the validity of the map. SEC. 1.11. Substandard Lots Prohibited. No final map or parcel map shall be approved, and no certif- icate of compliance shall be issued, if a substandard lot would thereby be created or recognized. SEC. 1.12. Fees. (a) Fees for the processing of any map or application re- ferred to in this Ordinance shall be as from time to time estab- lished by resolution of the Council. (b) No such map or application shall be filed or accepted for processing until the processing fee therefor is paid. SEC. 1.13. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, for any reason, is held to be invalid or unconstitu- tional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Or- dinance, it being hereby expressly declared that this'Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, would have been prepared, proposed, adopted, approved, and rati- fied irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsec- tions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or uncon- stitutional. ARTICLE 2. PARCEL MAPS SEC. 2.1. Application. Unless otherwise specified in ±his Ordinance, only the pro- visions of.this Article and Articles 1 and 7 of this Ordinance shall. apply to those subdivisions creating four (4) or fewer lots and those. subdivisions described in subsections (a), (b), (c), or (d) of Sec - y� i tion 66426 of the Government Code. SEC. 2.2. Parcel Maps Required. A parcel map is required for all subdivisions creating four (4) or fewer lots, and those subdivisions described in subsections (a), (b), (c) , or (9) of Section G6426 of the Government Code, un- less a parcel map is waived as provided in this Article. SEC. 2.3. Special Provisions: Subdivisions Described in Sub- section (a) of Section 66426 of the Government Code. No application for a parcel map for a subdivision described in subsection (a) of Section 66426 of the Government Code shall be accepted unless all off -site improvements are in existence and have been accepted for maintenance by the City. SEC. 2.4. Tentative Parcel Maps: Required. A tentative parcel map shall be required in all cases where a parcel map is or may be required by the provisions of this Ordi- nance or the Subdivision Map Act. SEC. 2.54 Tentative Parcel Maps: Applications: Filing: Requests for Waivers. (a) Tentative parcel maps shall be filed with the City En- gineer. (b) All tentative parcel maps shall be accompanied by an application. The number of copies of such application, and the form and content thereof, shall be as from time to time established by the City Engineer. (c) if the subdivider requests the waiver of a parcel map, the subdivider shall submit a written request for the waiver of the parcel map at the same time as the tentative parcel map is filed. The number of copies of the request for the waiver of a parcel map, and the form and content thereof, shall be as from time to time es- tablisnru by the City Engineer. SEC. 2.6. Tentative Parcel Maps: Form and Content. Tentative parcel maps shall be legibly drawn on one or more sheets eighteen inches (18 ") by twenty -six inches (26 ") in size. Tentative parcel maps shall contain the following information: (a) The boundary lines and a legal description of the par- eels; (b) The zoning of the area shown on the map. If the area is situated in more than one zono, zone boundaries shall be shown; (c) The area of the parcels shown in acres or square feet; (d) The lengths of the boundary lines of all lots; (e) The area of each.lot shown in acres or square feet; (f) Each lot shall be designated by a number; (g) The name, location, and width of all public streets and other public rights -of -way which abut upon or cross the parcels; (h) The location, and a description, of all existing struc- tures within the boundaries of the parcels; (i) The location and identity of all water and sewer lines providing service to the parcels; .(j) If a waiver of a parcel map is requested, of if the sub- divider desires to submit a parcel map not based upon a field sur- vey, the tentative parcel map shall show information from which it can be determined that sufficient survey information exists on filed maps to locate and retrace the exterior boundaries of the parcel map and that at least one of the boundary lines is a line between two (2) existing monuments of record; (k) The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the sub- divider, the person who prepared the map, and all owners of record of the parcels; and, (1) The date of preparation, the orientation, and the scale of the map. SEC. 2.7. Tentative Parcel Maps: Investigations, Reports, and Action by the City Engineer. (a) The City Engineer shall review the tentative parcel map to de<<_:.:_ae if it com,-)lies with all the applicable provisions of this Code and the Subdivision Map Act. The City Engineer shall in- spect the site of the proposed subdivision and shall conduct such further investigations as he shall deem necessary. (b) Following his investigation, the City Engineer shall pre - pare .a report on the proposed subdivision. such report shall contain, but need not be limited to, the following: (1) A statement.of any reason for the disapproval of the tentative parcel map; -7- (2) A statement of any condition of approval of the tentative parcel map, including dedications and improvements, if any; (3) A statement as to what improvements, if any, shall be constructed prior-to the issuance of a permit or other grant of approval for the development of any lot and the reasons therefor; and, (4) If a waiver of a parcel map has been requested, the report shall also contain a statement that the conditions for a waiver, as set forth in Section 2.13 of this Article, have been met, or, alternatively, a statement of the reasons why a par- cel map is requested, the City Engineer shall determine, within the same period, whether the parcel may be waived. i (c) The City Engineer shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove a tentative parcel map within fifty (50) days after its . submission but not less than three .(3) days after his report is served on the subdivider. If a waiver of a parcel map is requested, the City Engineer shall determine, within the same period, whether the parcel may be waived. SEC. 2.8. Tentative Parcel Maps: Disapproval. (a) The City Engineer shall disapprove a tentative parcel' map for those subdivisions described in subsections (a) , (b) , (c) , or (d) of Section 66426 of the Government Code if he makes any of the findings enumerated in subsections (a) through (g) , inclusive, of Section 66474 of the Government Code. (b) The City Engineer may disapprove a tentative parcel map, or refuse the waiver of a parcel map, for any subdivision containing four (4) of fewer lots if he makes any of the findings enumerated in subsections (a) through (g), inclusive, of Section 66474 of the Gov - ernment Code. SEC. 2.9. Dedications or irrevocable offers of dedication of rights -of -way and easements, intended for public use, shall be re- quired as a condition of the approval of a parcel map, or the waiver thereof, in the following cases: (1) Such dedication is necessary for the present or fu- ture construction or widening of any street in, accordance with the Master iidn u= Streets and Highways; (2) Such dedication is necessary for the present or fu- ture construction of any street to provide public access to each lot; and, (3) Such dedication is necessary for the present or fu- ture constriction of all improvements to provide public utility ser- vice to each lot. (b) The City Engineer is authorized to determine to neces- sity of dedications and to designate the land to be dedicated. (c) In any case where dedications or offers of dedications are required, the dedications or offers of dedication may be pre - sented to the Council at the same time the parcel map is presented . to the Council for approval.or at any earlier time. The Council shall take action with respect to such dedications or offers of dedication in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66477.1, '66477.2, and 66477.3 of the Government Code. (d) The acceptance of offers of dedication shall not be effective until the parcel map is filed in the Office of the County Recorder or a resolution of acceptance by the Council is filed in such office. SEC. 2.10. Removal of Encroaching Structures. (a) The demolition or removal, at the subdivider's expense, of any structure located wholly or in part within the right -of -way of a master planned street or proposed new street may be required as a condition of the approval of a parcel map or the waiver there- of. (b) Such demolition or removal may be postponed until such time as such street is constructed or widened. (c) In the event the destruction or removal of an encroach- ing structure is required, and such requirement is postponed, such fact shall be noted on the parcel map or upon the certificate of compliance if a parcel map is waived. SEC. 2.11. Soils Reports. The City Engineer may require a preliminary soils report prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 66490 of the Government Code. SEC. 2.12. Improvements: Postponing Construction: Improvement Security: Procedures. (a) The construction, at the subdivider's expense, of all of the following off -site improvements which are not in existence at the 1i, ,1 Lne application for a parcel map is filed shall be re- quired as a condition of the approval of a parcel map or the waiver thereof: (1) Asphaltic concrete pavement; (2) Concrete curbs and gutters; (3) Concrete sidewalks; (4) Street lights; { s; Y -9 , (5) street trees; (6) Concrete drive approaches;_ and, (7) Reinforced concrete storm drains. C cc ) �• (b) The City Engineer may waive the requirement of side- walks for lots in Industrial Zones if he finds that such side- walks are not necessary for public safety. (c) The City Engineer may require the construction of such other improvements which are, because of the nature, location, or use of the property, necessary for the protection of public health or safety. (d) Unless the.City Engineer finds that the construction of improvements is presently necessary for reasons of the public health and safety, or'is a necessary prerequisite to the development of cont:gucus parcels, the construction of such improvements shall be postponed until such time as a perm -t or other grant of approval for the development of a lot is izsued. (e) Any requirement for the construction of { mprovements, and any postponement of such requirement, may be made on a lot by' lot basis for' each lot in the subdivision. (f) The Council hereby finds that it is necessary for rea- sons of public health and safety that all off -site improvements be constructed within a period of nine (9) months following the recor- dation of a parcel map for each lot upon which there exists a build - ing or other usable structure at the time of such recordation. (g) No parcel map shall be transmitted by the City Clerk, in accordance with subsection (a) of section 66969 of the Government Code, until either: (1) All improvements which are required as a condition of the approval of the parcel map, or the waiver thereof, other than those improvements the construction of which has been postponed pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, have been constructed or the in lieu fees have been paid; or, (2) The subdivider has entered into an agreement with the City providing for the construction of the improvements, at the subdivider's expense, within a period of nine (9) months and has furnished security in connection with the performance of such agree- ment pursuant to the provisions of Section • 5.6 of Article 5 of this Ordinance. SEC. 2.13. Waivers of Parcel Maps: Certificates of Compliance. (a) The City Engineer may waive the requirement for a par - cel map if all of the :Following conditions are met: . -10- (1) The subdivider has requested a waiver as provided in this Article; (2`. field survey is not required; (3; bac ledications are required; (4) The parcel map is not for the purpose of causing a reversion to acreage; (5) The City Engineer finds that the division of land complies with such requirements as may have been established by the Subdivision Map Act and any law of the City enacted pursuant thereto as to area, improvement and design, flood water drainage control, appropriate approved public roads, sanitary disposal fa- cilities, water supply availability, and environmental protection; and, (6) A parcel map is not otherwise necessary for rea- sons of public health or safety. (b) if the City Engineer waives a parcel map, he shall is- sue a certificate of compliance for each lot created by the divis- ion of land. The fee for recording the certificates of compliance shall be paid by the applicant. (c) Requirements for the construction of improvements shall be noted on the certificate of compliance. SEC. 2.14. Appeals. (a) A subdivider may appeal any action of the City Engineer with respect to a tentative parcel map or a parcel map to the Appeal Board. (b) A subdivider or the City Engineer may appeal from the action of the Appeal Board to the Council. (c) The procedures for processing, hearings, and decisions of such appeals shall be as set forth in Section 66452.5 of the Government Code. SEC. 2.15. Parcel Maps: Form and Content. (a) Parcel maps shall: (1) Conform to all of the provisions of Section 66445 of the Government Code; (2) de based upon a field survey made in conformity with the band Surveyor's Act unless the City Engineer has previously determined that the conditions set forth in Section 66448 of the , Government Code, under which a field.survey may be dispensed with, exist; (3) Contain the certificates required by Sections 66449 and 66450 of the: Government Code; (4) All require' dedications or offers of dedication may be made by certificate on the parcel map or by separate instru- ment; and, (5) Requirements for the construction of improvements shall be noted by certificate on the parcel map. SEC. 2.16. Filing Parcel Maps for Approval: Approval or Disap- proval. (a) A parcel map conforming to the approved or conditionally approved tentative parcel map may be filed with the Council for approval after all the required certificates on such map have been signed and, where necessary, acknowledged. (b) Unless the time is extended as provided in subsection (c) of this section, an approved or conditionally approved tentative parcel map shall expire unless a parcel map is recorded within eighteen (18) months after the date on which such tentative parcel map was approved or conditionally approved. (c) Upon a written application of the subdivider, made prior to the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative parcel map, the City Engineer may extend the time for filing a par- cel map for an additional period or periods, the total of which shall not exceed two (2) years.. (d) The Council, within a period of ten (10) days after the filing of the parcel map or at its next regular meeting after the meeting at which it receives the map, shall approve the parcel map if it conforms with all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and this Ordinance and any rulings made thereunder orp if it does not so conform, disapprove the parcel map. ARTICLE 3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS SEC 3.1. Filing. (a) Tentative tract maps shall be filed with the City En- gineer. (b) All tentative tract maps shall be accompanied by an application. 'The number of copies of such application, and the form and content thereof, shall be as from time to time established by the City Engineer. -12- st SEC. 3.2. Form and Content. , Tentative tract maps shall be legibly drawn on one or more sheets eighteen inches (18 ") by twenty -six inches (26 ") or twenty - four inches (24 ") by thirty -six inches (36 ") in size. Tentative: tract maps shall contain the following information: (a) The boundary lines and a legal description of the par- cels; (b) The zoning of the area shown.on the map. If the area is situated in more than one zone, zone boundaries shall be shown; (c) The area of the parcels shown in acres or square feet; (d) The lengths of the boundary lines of all lots; (e) The area of each lot shown in acres or square feet; (f) Each lot shall be designated by a number; (g) The location and identity of abutting tracts, other maps of public record, streets, and other public rights -of -way; (h) The location and identity of any existing structures, utility lines, and easements within the boundaries of the parcels; (i) Any obstructions within five feet (51) of any existing parcel line or proposed lot line; (j) Any significant topographical feature inside the boundary or within 200 feet of the boundary lines of the parcels, including water and drainage courses, railroad lines, and the like; (k) The location and identity of all existing and proposed public utility easements; (1) The layout of the proposed streets, alleys, and other rights -of -way, with approximate grades and a general drainage plan; (m) The location, size, and approximate•grades of sewers and drains; (i') The approximate contour lines; (o) The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the sub- divider, the person who prepared the map, and all owners of record of the parcels; and, (p) The date of preparation, the orientation, and the scale 4 of the map. . . I} -13- SEC. 3.3. City Engineer: Investigations and Reports. The City Engineer shall review the tentative tract map to determine if it conforms with a'.1 the applicable provisions herein set forth and the Subdivision Flap Act. The City Engineer shall inspect the site of the proposed subdivision and shall conduct such further investigations as he shall deem necessary. The City Engineer shall prepare a report on the tentative tract map which report shall contain, but need not be limited tb, the following: (a) A statement that all the information required to be shown on a tentative tract map is shown thereon or, alternatively, an itemization of those items required to be shown which are not shown thereon; (b) A statement as to whether o- not the tentative tract map provides for proper grading and erosion control, including the prevention of sedimentation or damages to off -site property; (c) An environmental assess:ent prepared in accordance with the guidelines for the implementation of the Environmental Quality Act of the State; (d) A determination as to whether the preliminary soils re- port referred to in Section 66490 of the Government Code should be required or waived and the reasons for such reccmmendation; (e) A statement as to whether or not a discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system would result in the violation of the existing requirements prescribed by any Regional Water Quality Control Board of the State having jurisdiction over the area of the proposed subdivision, if it is proposed that the subdivision shall discharge waste into such existing community sewer system; (f) (9 ) (h) SEC. 3.4. The recommended dedications, The recommended improvements; and, Other. recommended conditions of approval. Development Advisory Board: Investigations and Ieports. Upon the completion of the City Engineer's report, the tenta- tive tract map and the City Engineer's report shall be transmitted to the Development Advisory Board for further investigation and report. The Development Advisory Board shall conduct such further in- vestigations as it shall deem necessary. The Development Advisory Board shall prepare a report on the tentative tract map and t.ze pro- posed subdivision which report shall include, but need not be lim- ited to, the following: -14- (a) A statement that it concurs with the report of the City Engineer or, alternatively, an itemization of such portions of the report of the City Engineer not concurred in, and its recommenda- tions with respect thereto; (b) A statement that the tentative tract map-is consistent with all. applicable general and specific plans or, alternatively, a statement detailing any inconsistencies; (c) A statement that the design or improvement of the pro- posed subdivision is consistent with all applicable general and specific plans or, alternatively, a statement detailing any incon- sistencies; (d) A statement that the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed or, alternatively, a statement of the reasons why the site is not physically suitable; (e) A statement that the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environ- m=ntal damage or substantial and avoidable injuries to fish or wild- life or their habitat or, alternatively, a statement detailing such damages or injuries which may result from the design of the subdivis- ion or the type of improvements; (f) A statement that the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems or, alternatively, a statement detailing those serious public health problems which are likely to result from the design of the subdivisions or the type of improvements; (g) A statement that the design of the subdivision or the type type of improvements will not conflict with any easement ac- quired by the public at large, then of record, for access through or the use of the property within the proposed subdivision or, al- ternatively, a statement as to the nature of any such conflict, to- gether with a recommendation as to the adequacy of any alternative easement proposed to be dedicated by the subdivider; and, (h) Any additional cr alternative conditions.of approval recommended by the Development Advisory Board. SEC. 3.::. Action of the Advisory Agency. (a) Within fifty (50) days after the submission of the ten- tative tract map, the Advisory Agency shall consider the tentative tract map, ..�jgether with the reports of the City Engineer and the Development Advisory Board, and shall approve, conditionally ap- prove, or disapprove the tentative t=act map. (b) If the tentative tract map is conditionally approved, the Advisory Agency, within ten (10) days following its action, shall notify the subdivider in writing of those conditions which must be met prior to filing a,final map. SEC. 3.6. Disapproval. (a) The Advisory Agency shall disapprove a tentative tract map if it makes any of the findings enumerated in subsections (a) through (g), inclusive, of Section 66474 of the Government Code. (b) The Advisory Agency may disapprove a tentative tract map if it finds that the proposed waste discharge from the subdi- vision would result in or add to violations of the requirements of any Regional Water Quality Board of the State having jurisdiction of the area in which the subdivision is located. SEC. 3.7. Soils Reports. (a) The City Engineer may waive a preliminary soils report if he shall determine that, due to the knowledge the City has as to the soil qualities of the soils of the subdivision, no prelim - inary analysis is required. (b) If the preliminary soils report indicates the presence of critically expansive soils or other soil problems which, if not corrected, would lead to structural defects, the City Engineer may require a soils investigation of each lot in the proposed subdivis- ion. (c) All soils investigations which are required shall be done by a civil engineer, registered in the State, who shall rec- ommend the corrective action which is likely to prevent structural damage to each structure proposed to be constructed in the area where such soil problems exist. SEC. 3.8. Appeals: Action of the Advisory Agency. (a) The subdivider may appeal any action of the Advisory Agency to the Council. (b) Any interested person adversely affected by an action of the Advisory Agency may file a complaint with the Council con- cerning such action. (c) The procedures for processing, hearings,-and decisions of such appeals or complaints shall be as set forth in Section 66452.5 of the Government Code. -16- ARTICLE 4. DEDICATIONS SEC. 4.1. General. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of a final map, the Advisory Agency, at the time it takes action on the tentative tract map, may require dedications or irrevocable offers of dedication of real property within the subdivision for streets, alleys, including access rights and abutters' rights, drainage, public utility easements, and other public easements. The location and amount of the property to be dedicated or to be subject to such irrevocable offers of dedication, and the purposes therefor, shall be as determined by the Advisory Agency. SEC. 4.2. Bicycle Paths. If the Advisory Agency requires the subdivider to dedicate roadways to the public, and if the subdivision contains 200 or more lots, the Advisory Agency may also require the subdivider to dedi- cate such additional land as may be necessary and feasible to pro- vide bicycle paths for the use and safety of the residents of the subdivision. SEC. 4.3. Equestrian Trails. If the Advisory Agency requires the subdivider to dedicate roadways to the public, and if the subdivision is situated in a zone in which horses may be kept, the Advisory Agency may also re- quire the subdivider to dedicate such additional land as may be necessary and feasible to provide equestrian access from the lots in the subdivision to any existing or master planned equestrian trails. SEC. 4.4. Transit Facilities. The Advisory Agency may require dedications or irrevocable offers of dedication of land within the subdivision for local transit facilities, such as bus turnouts, benches, shelters, land- ing pads, and similar items which directly benefit the residents of the subdivision, if: (a) The subdivision as shown on the tentative tract map has the potential for 200 dwelling units or more if developed to the maximum capacity shown on the adopted General Plan or contains 100 acres or more; and, (b) The Council has previously found that transit services are, or will within a reasonable time be made, available to such subdivision. -17- 1 SEC..4.5. Elementary Schools. Upon the written request of the San Bernardino County Board of Education, or the governing board of any school district in which the subdivision is located in whole or in part, the Coun- cil may require, as a condition precedent to the approval and rec- ordation of any final map, that the subdivider dedicate to the school district or districts in which such subdivision is located such land as the Council shall deem necessary for the purpose of constructing thereon such elementary schools as are necessary to assure the residents of the subdivision adequate public school ser- vice. If such dedication is required, the provisions of Section 66478 of the Government Code shall apply thereto. SEC. 4.6. Waivers of Direct Access. The Advisory Agency may require that the dedications of of- fers of dedication of streets include a waiver of the direct access rights to any such street from any property shown on a final map as abutting thereon. ARTICLE 5. IMPROVEMENTS SEC. 5.1. General. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of a final map, the Advisory Agency, at the time it takes action on the tentative tract map, may require the construction or installa- tion, at the subdivider's expense, of such street work, utilities, landscaping, and other improvements as the Advisory Agency determines are necessary for the general use of the lot owe.grs in the subdivis- ion or for local neighborhood traffic and drainage needs. SEC. 5.2. Supplemental Capacity. The Advisory Agency may also require that improvements in- stalled by the subdivider for the benefit of the subdivision contain a supplemental size, capacity, or number for the benefit of property not within the subdivision and that such improvements be dedicated to the public. SEC. 5.3. Reimbursements for Supplemental Capacity. (a) In the event the improvements constructed by the subdi- vider are required to contain a supplemental capacity for the bene- fit of property not within the subdivision, the City shall enter in- to an agreement with the subdivider to reimburse the subdivider for that port4.an of the cost of such improvements equal to the difference between the amount it would have cost the subdivider to install such 1r -18- _. improvements to serve the subdivision only and the actual cost of ' such improvements. (b) In order to pay the costs required by a reimbursement agreement, the City shall collect from other persons, including pub- lic agencies, using such improvements for the benefit of .real prop- erty not within the subdivision a reasonable charge for such use. SEC. 5.4. Environmental Protection Improvements. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of a final map, and at the time it takes action on the tentative tract map, the Advisory Agency may require the subdivider to install or construct such other improvements as it deems necessary to: (a) Provide for the quiet and safe use and enjoyment of the property by the occupants of the subdivision; (b) Protect surrounding property s.s to its use and enjoy- ment; and, (c) Provide for the protection of the health and safety of the general public. SEC. 5.5. Assessment Districts. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of any final map, and at the time it takes action with respect to a tentative tract map, the Advisory Agency may require the subdivider to agree to the formation.of an assessment district or districts un- der the Landscaping. and Lighting Act of 1972. SEC. 5.6. Construction: Improvement Security. (a) No final map shall be transmitted by the City Clerk in accordance with subsection (a) of Section 66464 of the Government Code until either: (1) All improvements which are required as a condition of the approval of the final map have been constructed or the in- lieu fc_L; :ave been paid; or, (2) The subdivider has entered into an agreement with the City providing for the construction of such improvements, at the subdivider's expense, within a period of twelve (12) months after the recordation of the map. In such case the subdivider shall be re- quired to furnish security in connection with the performance of such agreement, which security may be any of the types described in subsections (a), (b), and (c) of Section 66499 of the Government Code. (b) The estimated cost of the improvements shall be deter - E mined by the City Engineer. (c) Security to guarantee the performance of an improve - meet agreement shall be in the following amounts: (1) One hundred percent (1008) of the total estimated cost of the improvements, conditioned upon the faithful performance of the agreement; and, (2) An additional amount equal to one hundred percent (1008) of the total estimated cost of the improvements, securing payment to the contractor, his subcontractors, and those persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment to them for the improve- ments. (d) Twenty -five percent (258) of the security for the per- formance of the agreement shall be retained for a period of twelve (12) months after the acceptance of the improvements by the City to pay the costs of any repairs made necessary by reason of defective workmanship or materials. (e) Improvement security shall be released only in accord- ance with the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of Section 66499.7 of the Government Code. Except as provided in this section, there shall be no partial release of improvement security. The City Engineer is authorized to release the improvement security in ac- cordance with the provisions of this section.. ARTICLE 6. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: MISCELLANEOUS SEC. 6.1. Dwelling Units: Health and Safety Items. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of a final map for a residential subdivision, and at the time it takes action on the tentative tract map, the Advisory Agency may require the subdivider to a.ncorporate into each dwelling unit such items as it deems necessary for the health and safety of the occupants there- of. Such items may include, but need not be limited to, the follow- ing: (a) Fireplace chimney spark arresters; (b) Noise insulation; and, (c) Filtered air - conditioning. SEC. 6.2. Zoning. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of a final map, and at the time it takes action on the tentative tract map, the Advisory Agency may require the subdivider to secure a change -20- of zone to the most restrictive zone in which the proposed use is permitted. SEC. 6.3. Notices to Department of Real Estate. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of a final map for a.residential subdivision, and at the time it takes action on the tentative tract map, the Advisory Agency may require that the subdivider advise the Department of Real Estate of the State of any matter which the Advisory Agency believes should be included in the public report to be issued by said Department with respect to the subdivision. SEC. 6.4. Installation of Landscaping and Irrigation Systems: Assessment Districts. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for a lot abutting upon a parkway in an assessment district until all the required land- scaping and irrigation systems have.been installed. Such installa- tions may be in phases as determined by the Advisory Agency. SEC. 6.5. Maintenance of Landscaping and Irrigation Systems: Assessment Districts. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of a final map, and at the time it takes action on the tentative tract map, the Advisory Agency may require the subdivider to maintain, at his own expense, all landscaping and irrigation systems within a proposed assessment district until such time as the first assessment for the assessment district is placed on the County assessment roll. SEC. 6.6. Demolition. As a condition precedent to the approval and acceptance of a final map, and at the time it takes action on the tentative tract map, the Advisory Agency may require the demolition or removal, at the subdivider's expense, of any structure located wholly or in part within the right -of -way of a master planned street or proposed new street. ARTICLE 7. IN LIEU PAYMENTS SEC. 7.1. Establishment of In Lieu Payments. (a)- The Council, by resolution, shall establish a payment schedule for payments i.n lieu of the installation of street lights and the planting of parkway trees. (b) The Council, by resolution, may establish payment sched- ules for payments in lieu of the installation or construction of any other improvement which may be required as a condition of a final or Parcel map. -21- - SEC. 7. 2. Payment of In Lieu Payments. ' (a) The Community Services Department shall determine ..hether payments may be permitted in lieu of planting parkway trees. (b) The City Engineer shall determine whether payments may be permitted in lieu of installing street lights; provided, however, no payment in lieu of installing street lights shall be permitted for any new residential subdivision for which a final map is required. (c) The City Engineer shall determine whether. payments in lieu of the installation or construction of any other improvement, for which an in lieu payment is hereafter allowed, -may be permitted. SEC. 7.3. Revolving Street Lighting Fund. (a) All payments made in lieu of installing street lights shall be deposited in the Revolving Street Lighting Fund. (b) Moneys deposited in the Revolving Street Lighting Fund shall be used exclusively for the installation of new street lights. (c) At least annually the City Engineer shall submit a re- port to the Council. Such report shall contain: (1) A listing of locations for which in lieu payments have been made which do not then have street lighting; (2) The smm of money on deposit in the Revolving Street Lighting Fund; and, (3.) Recommendations as to the priority of locations for the construction of street lights. (d) The Council, by resolution,. may order disbursements from the Revolving Street Lighting Fund for the installation of new street lights at any location for which in lieu payments have been made. Any such resolution shall designate the priority of locations, which priority need not be based upon the dates on which in lieu payments were made. SEC. 7.A. Parkway Tree In Lieu Payments. (a) All payments made in lieu of planting parkway trees shall be maintained in a separate account for each subdivision con- cerned and shall be expended only for the planting•of parkway trees for each such subdivision, except as provided in subsection (c) of this section. (b) The quantity, variety, and location of parkway trees shall be determined by the Community Services Department. -22- (c) If, prior to the planting of parkway trees by the City, ' parkway trees are planted on any lot by the owner thereof, or if the owner of any lot requests in writing that a parkway tree not be planted on his lot, then any portion of the parkway tree in lieu ' payment of a subdivision not expended for tree planting by reason thereof may be used by the City for any purpose. ARTICLE S. MONUMENTS SEC. S.i. 1-10nument8 Required. No final map shall be transmitted by the City Clerk in ac- cordance with subsection (a) of Section 66464 of the Government Code until: (a). All monuments required by Section 65495 of the Govern- ment Code have been set; or, (b) The subdivider has complied with the provisions of Sec- tion 66496 of the Government Code with respect to those interior monuments which have not been set. SEC. 8.2. Monument Security. Security for the cost of setting such monuments shall be the estimated cost thereof as determined by the City Engineer. ARTICLE 9. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SEC. 9.1. Undergro-und Placement Required. Except as jtherwise provided in this Article, all utilities shall be placed underground. SEC. 9.2. Applicatio:. (a) The provisions of Section 9.1 of this Article shall ap- ply oiil� Lo new residential subdivisions for which a final map is required. (b) The provisions of Section 9.1 of this Article shall not apply to: (1) Appurtenances and associated equipment, such as surface- mounted transformers, pedestal - mounted terminal boxes, meter cabinets, and concealed ducts in an underground system; cilities; (2) Street lighting fixtures and traffic control fa- -23- (3) Facilities necessary to the transmission or re- ception of radiated wireless communication; and, (9) Electric transmission lines of 160000 vnits or more; (5) Temporary facilities. SEC. 9.3. Waivers. The Advisory Agency may waive "or modify the requirements of Section 9.1 of this Article if topographical, soil, or other con- ditions make compliance therewith unreasonable or imprac` 1. ARTICLE 10. FINAL MAPS SEC. 10.1. Form and Content: Processing. The form and content of final maps, the certificates re- quired on the same, and the manner of the processing thereof shall be as specified in the subdivision Map Act. SEC. 10.2. Time of Filing, Extensions, and Conditions. (a) Unless time is extended as provided in subsection (b) of this section, an approved or conditionally approved tentative tract map shall expire unless a final map is recorded within eighteen (18) months after the date on which such tentative tract map was approved or conditionally approved. (b) Upon a written application of the subdivider made prior to the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tenta- tive tract map, the Advisory Agency may extend the time for filing a final map an additional period or periods, the total of which shall not exceed two (2) years. (c) As a condition of granting an extension of time pur- suant to subsection (b) of this section, the Advisory Agency mad revise or impose additional conditions -)f approval to insure that all imp,.,,vements will be in compliance with the standards of the City in effect at the time such extension is granted. (d) No final map shall be filed for approval prior to the expiration of the time for an appeal or the filing of any complaint or, if such appeal.or complaint is filed, prior to the fipal dis- position thereof. -2a- ARTICLE 11. REVERSIONS TO ACREAGE SEC. 11.1- Reversions by Filing Parcel Maps. When permitted by Section 66499.20 -1/2 of the Government Code, and subject to the conditions thereof, reversions to acreage shall be accomplished by the filing of a parcel map in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance pertaining to parcel maps. ARTICLE 12. CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE SEC. 12.1. Authority of the City Engineer. The City Engineer is authorized to issue or deny the issu- ance of a certificate of compliance. SEC. 12.2. Filing; Applications. (a) Applications for certificates of compliance shall be filed with the City Engineer. (b) The form and content of applications for certificates Of compliance shall be as from time to time established by the City Engineer. SEC. 12.3. Grounds for Denial. The City Engineer shall deny the issuance of a certificate of compliance if he finds that the division of the property did, or does, not -omply with all the applicable provisions of the Subdivi s- ion Map Act and this Ordinance or the provisions of any applicable law in effect at the time the division took place. SEC. 12.4. Appeals. (a) An applicant may appeal a decision of the City Engineer denying the issuance of a certificate of compliance to the Appeal Boards. (b) The procedures for processing, hearings, and decisions of such appeals shall be as set forth in Section 66452.5 of the Government Code. ARTICLE 13. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS SEC. 13.1. Procedure Established by Resolution. The procedure for obtaining the approval of a lot line ad- �., tiv -25- ;�. c' Y � Environmental Improvement Agency (714) 383 -1718 Planning Department Information (711f) 383 -1372 & 1417 1111 East Mill Street San Bernardino, CA 92415 ' 1. THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A: (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE TYPE BELOW) SITE APPROVAL (LOCATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN), LARGE SCALE HOUSING PROJECT, MOBILEHOME PARK, RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK, SUBDIVISION, ZONE CHANGE, TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT - SALES OFFICE AND /OR SUBDIVISION SIGN, ZONE VARIANCI X MINOR DEVIATION, GOVT PROJECT, R 2. APPLICANT'S NAME SECONDO J. COLOMBERO TELEPHONE NUIMER (714) 673 -6372 3. MAILING ADDRESS 100 E. Halboa Blvd, Balboa CA ZIP CODE 192661 4. DATE March 13. 1978 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (from tax bill) 229- 151 -15 5. INDIVIDUAL TO BE NOTIFIED OTHER THAN APPLICANT DONA COLOMBERO ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE Same 6. COMPLETE THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ON REVERSE SIDE: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY j, GENERAL. LOCATION OF PROPERTY. Indicating which side of the street, the property's location from nearest street or intersection and the town or community. rte'• a. DESCRIBE PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY OR REASONS FOR THIS ACTION: 9. COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF FROPERTY AND APPROXIMATE SQUP.RE FOOTAGE OR ACREAGE. (Taken from Deed(s) or Survey). , 1 INDEX N0:. . /�Cl 0 � • ......... APPLICATION FILING DATE... ,ZONE CLASSIF ATION� ...�/�� ............ (RECEIPT NO. & FEE) ..�3G•. PANEL NO....I V4> P. E. D.F. FILING DATE ......................... GFNERAL PLAN RECUtd .. !'., . 1. •' �"'E, IIELGDe��fl L .......................... . w 1 .. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE i »r•v. c:a. �4�':':�':'.'•:'y(RECEIPT N0, & FEE) .......................... A. L. U. C ...... ............................... E.I.R. APPROVAL DATE......................... M.S. NO .... ............................... CERTIF. OF COMPL. NO ........................ lr IS I TvzC anit.JONN M.M. C-20 1003 1C, t Blvd., Balboa, CA 9.661 March 13, 1978 sTr U r Otte ui.al Ay �... �•Y ..._F.�11 WAM 0 i i IIYTb Clq I�t . 11 IS I� all, 3i 1 ■ 1 i� • i I 1 I 1 L ""'iii ^_.._.. �..�. .._..... (714) 4Y/7 r. yb C/fr Lot 431, FourANA ARROW ROUTE' NO. 2102, as por,nap recorded Book 31 of Maps, pages 11 through 15, inclusive, Record of San Bernardino County. M -1 Zone �w._ r �•Y a i i � En iro=ental Improvement agency (714) 383 -1718 Planning Department Infor...ation (714) 383 -1372 & 1417 1111 East *fill Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415 1. THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A: (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE TYPE BELOW) SITE APPROVAL (LOCATION AMID DEVELOPMENT PLAN), LARGE SCALE HOUSING PROJECT, MOBILEROME PARK, RECREATIOILAL VEHICLE PARK, \ SUBDIVISION, ZONE CHANGE, TFSD7ORARY OCMPANCY PEM41T - - SALES OFFICE ?.ND /OR SUBDIVISION SIGN, ZONE VARIANCE, MINOR DEVIATION, GOVT PROJ=Cr, OTHER 2. APPLICANT'S :TAISE J. GREGORY LAWLOR, FN TBRPRISES TELEPHONE NUMBER 7 565 -7426 3. MAILING ADDRESS 7380 Clairemont Mesa Blvd, Suite 109 S.D. ZIP CODE U OSL -51 4, DATE ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (from tax bill) 200- 061-12 5. INDIVIDUAL TO BE NOTIFIED OTHER THAN .APPLICANT Bill Moorhous.- Tou s Cor oration (714) 454 -9162 ADDRESS AND TELEP1i0N£22ry3 Ay n d� de 1a P�Suite 267- j1 t.1iig .Ca Q'017 6. COMPLETE THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ON REVERSE SIDE: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY. Indicating which side of the street, the property's location from nearest street or intersection and the town or community. S. DESCRIBE PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY OR REASONS FOR THIS ACTION: Ig, CO:TLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND APPROXIMATE SQUARE FOOTAGE OR ACREAGE. (Taken ' from Deed(s) or Survey). ZONE CLASSIFICATION ........................ M.S. NO . .. ....... ...................... CERTIF. OF COMPL. NO . ..................... GENERAL PLAN REF ........................... GENERAL PLAN RECOM ......................... SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ........................ A. L. U. C ..... ............................... �� r� APPLICATION FILING DATE ....................... (RECEIPT NO. & FEE) ........................... P.E.D.F. FILING DATE .......................... (RECEIPT 40. & FEE)..... ........... ..... E.I.R. FILING DATE ............................. (RECEIPT NO. & FEE) ............. ... ...... E.I.R. APPROVAL DATE .......................... 10. COMPLETF ONLY THOSE SECTIONS THAT APPLY TO YOUR TYPE APPLICATION. •`a. SITE APPROVAL (Location and Development Plan): Is a Zone Change being applied for or has a Zone Change been withheld pending Devel- opment Plant on your property which would permit your proposed uses(s): X YES 'qO. For Large Scale Housing Projects, Mobilehome and Recreation Vehicle Parka complete the following: Size of Parcel - (acres) Total Number of Units Units Per Acre b. ZONE CBANGST• Present Zone Classification R -1 -1G 2roposed Zone Classification n_i_,+n- c. ZONE VARIANCE OR MINOR DEVIATION: Answer the following statements as to host long they apply to your proposal: 1) Application for variance or deviation will not be detrimental to public welfare or other properties in the area. (Assuming everyone in the area were allowed to do what you have requested, explain why the resulting development would NOT be detrimental to the public good or reduce property values in the area, and ultimately results in better community developments.) d. TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT (T.O.P.) Sales office and /or Subdivision Sign: 1) Type of Sales Office: (see Check List), Dimensions of Sales Office "A" - In residence with off - street parking =11C11 - Garage Conversion Q "B" - In residence without off - street parking ED "D" - Portable Building 2) Dimensions of Si ga Sign "Copy" SIGiLITURE: I certify under penalty of perjury that I am the (check one) M Legal Owner s) (all individual osiers must sign as their names appear on L�h—e- �deed to the land, � Corporate Officer(s) emplowered to sign for ^'ie cot�aration, or' L.1 Owner's Legal agent having Power of Attorney for this action, (a certified Power of Attorney document must accompany the application form), and that the foregoing is true an -1 correct. t_ (Signature )r (Date) (Signature) (Date) r (PEJF) DATE FILED: Y -z7- 79- Introduction: The questions in this form are designed to obtain enough data about your proposed project and your project site to allow the staff and /or ERC to adequately assess your project. �y t3k no_ the time to _fully respond to the ouest'. below, you can help reduce the orocessina time fog our project. You may also include any additional information which you believe is pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary. APPLICANT'S NAME: J. GREGORY LAIVLOR ENTERPRISES TYPE OF PROJECT OR ACTION: Tentative Plan and Rezone to permit construction of a residentlal subdivision. PROJECT LOCATION (GENERAL & LEGAL): Rancho Cucamonga: North of Almond Street - See Attachment A for brief legal description. SITE INDEX NUMBER: ZONE CLASSIFICATION: • 12- 1 -211mT n•,r'e1 12.1.1 GENERAL PLAN RECOMMENDATION: None - Cit)• of Rgnc -hn rurnmansp has nn presently adopted City general pl.-n. If there is an existing EIR on your project site, give the name and the date it was wri tten. If this is a request for Categorical Exemption, indicate here and give exemption class: Project Description 1. Describe your proposed project in as much detail as possible. Identify the project's specific components and the reasons for proposing the project at this time. Also, discuss the specific issues identified below, where applicable. The proposed project is a residential development of single family e ac a comes. Ine property consists o acres. it would be divided into averaging 00 and density to uses occurring immediately to the south and represents a logical extension of development. A loQ)ing street system has been klesi=ad to all w, tilt, greatest possible access. An estimated 2000 lineal feet of offsite streets are individual pads thus minimizing the necessary amount of land alteration. Sensitive areas of the site including Cucamonga Wash and the hillsides bounding the nations Forest, wiit�tt as natural open space. Approximately 47.4 acres is being dedicated a..r V'esc>�'i`R any product(s) that will be manufactured or processed by your project and the market it (they)will serve. ICAR1 Wwr AR121 V y:. PELF b. Indicate the market that your units are designed to serve. tHiltiln and LpNfr- middle income level fnmilifs _ c. Discuss any phasing of your project on the indicated site or in relation to a larger project (if one t:)Lists). Proir6ctto be constructed.. in 4 -6 phases b_ecinnior with thg southernmost lots alla gccess roads, Construction will then Proceed through the western and central lots with the mist northerly homes constructed last. d. Size of Parcel(s) (acres) 160.8 Acres Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 200 - 051 -51 and 200- 061 -12 Total number of units 196 Total number of lots 202 (4 open space lots) Square footage of all structures information not presently available Height of proposed structures Information not presently available Number of parking spaces Mi im Area of paved surface 14.4 acres Total disturbed area 39.6 acres Street(s) that provide access Almond Street e. Air Quality Information: Number and type of vehicles associated with completed project Approximately 392 standard famil cars plus a minor number of delivery trucks, sc oo uses, etc. Odors emanating from project (type) none Housing Tracts or Subdivisions Type of Units plannedsingle family detached homes Number of Units of each type Exact unit number has not been determined Average floor area (living space) of each type Information not presently available Average Number of Vehicles per Unit 2 cars per dwelling unit �4,)- 2 ,3 Commercial and Industrial Projects NOT APPLICABLE Types of emissions and sources associated with. project Electricity to be consumed by completed project in kwh /month Natural gas to be consumed by completed project in therms/month._____ 1000 cubic feet /month Any other fuel snurces (and amounts) to be consumed by completed project Site Description 2. Describe the site as thoroughly as possible. The following factors should be considered: a. covers. List tthe animalst that nyou dhave seen eora that f � a are known t3 occur an the site. Much of the site is covered by sage scrub which has been various disturbed. Remnant grape vines from previous agricultural activities are located in the southern portion of the property. b. Describe lghg , ela f jandscape) of the site. Anydata on soisandeologywouldasobeh helpful. " Topographical l the site consists of two moderately sloping terraces with elevations ranging from 2170 feet 1b 2840 feet. Cucamon a Nash crosses the weste p ian e o ie proper y. opes range rom --)U', wit approximate y - acre having slopes of 0 -15.. Drainage of the majority of the site is generally via rather undefined channels extending from north to south. Further information will prove e y a soi s geo ogy report presently i-.kg done by Leighton C. Discuss any stream channels or eroded areas an the site. Associates. P of the site. it will be left in open space,_. 3 d. _.r Describe any improvements on the site. An asphalt road used by the forest service for natio the eastern Pro2ertv boundary, Mn' _ Southern California Edison Companv extend across —the souther -- corner of the property. _ e. If your project site is located within.a known archaeological resource area, you.may be required to provide documentation on the archaeological potential of your site. The ERC will determine if such documentation is necessary, and may continue your project until the necessary study is performed. You may save time in the processing of your project by obtaining a letter or study on the archaeological status of your site prior to the ERC meeting. You may contact the San Bernardino County Museum (Dr. Gerald Smith, 7141825 -4825) to obtain a form for conducting this study and /or a list of qualified organizations and individuals who perform this service. f. Describe the agencies that are or will be providing the following services or utilities. Indicate whether these services are already provided to the project site. Electrici ann__(�n at property boundaries upon construction and occu ancv of hom c Gas - Southern at Almond Sapphire interspction wben halues nEc acr-14iP-. Water- Cucamonga Cgunty when homes are occurried. Sewag_. Disposal Onsite individual septic tank-leagh line sygrams- -Refus"tsPoSal upon occupation of homes. Schools Chaffey Joint Union—High School District anj Altal4nTrug_11,ninn School District: Service can be provided by Altaloma School D;ct_r_ict 'aTfrouugh Chaffee schools are presently at capacity. - Vxe_Pxotection Foothills-- u on occupation of homes _.... r�` PEDF ' -5- 3. Describe the land uses on the adjacent land i'n each direction. Note any major or important natural or man -made features on the adjacent land; for example,major highways, stream channels, or other notable features. Where possible, provide a vicinity map showing the project site's relationship. to these features. Worth - San Bernardino National Forest Cast - vacant South - Single family homes and scattered agricultural activities; (Vest - Cucamonga Wash - San Bernardino National Forest 4. Describe the site alterations that will be produced by your proposed project. For instance, describe topographic changes, the percentage of the site that will be graded, storm flows that will have to be channelized, and other changes. Also, indicate any new services or utilities that will be required as a result of your project. As presently designed, topographic changes will be minimal with gi:.wing will be retained. Approximately, 35+ acres (222) will be graded. Runoff rom the property is presently carried by many small undefined channels as "sheet flow" prop rty s pre n Fr ri it i Inn 1Ln�y1 .•n• ld��„ •r ri mer., t.. 1 T"1544 illill W-.,T.73 WaTru. .M. and storm drains to the rxisting Almond Intprrept Np5j sarv4&ra that M"Id —be- required by the development generally entail the extension of existing water, gas, 5. Identify any a`her agencies that you have contacted during the procnssina of your project. Please include copies of correspondence with any stato, federal or other local agencies or departments where the proposed project is discussed. County- -planning De Department of Transportation, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality __ Control Board, Co. Museum, Cucamonga County Water District, ' Chaffee Joint Union High School District, Altaloma Union School District. . S if your project requires any permits from other agencies, please identify the agency and type of permit. Some agencies or departments that you may have to obtain permits from are listed below. Flood Control District Local Fire Protection Agency Air Pollution Control County Public Health Department County Environmental Health Departmmnt County Airport Land Use Commission County Planning Department State Regional Water Quality Control Board State Real Estata Commission Federal agencies Type of permit Permits will be needed from the Public Health Department to allow installation of septic tanks. 7. Please include a copy of any studies (soils, geology, marketing, etc.) that you may have had prepared for this project or for this site. All reports will be returned at the end of your project's review, if requested. r Signature Pr j ect�Proponent or ner of Record) Y' f ' J ATTACHMENT A Parcel 1: A protion of Government Lot 1, Section 20, Township 1 North, Ranch 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian Parcel 2: A portion of Covernment Lot 4, Section 21. Township 1 North, Ranch 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian Parcel 3: The south one -half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian Parcel 4: A portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. LANNI= COOMISSION HEARING PATEt June 14, 1978 AGENDA ITEM NO. r� ROUTINE ITEM NON- ROUTINE ITEM RANCHO CUCA14ONGA TIME OF ITEM PLANNING COMMISSION IT�u.r ARIA: Rancho Cucamonga PIWINDEX NO: Zone Change Index No. W103 -12 PROPOSAL.: Zone Change from A -1 -5 to C -1 I.LCATIOV: S/s of 19th Street, approx. 1500 feet E/o Hermosa APPIJCANP: Louis Parks L•NG I NY J WARCI I T'1T1:T : 8 PUBLIC I1Pld"G NOTICES Sant ON 6 -2 -78 1UT'017r VWTAMI) BY: Douglas Payne FIELD INSPEL`PION TL•'Itim- DATE OF INSPI=ICN: PARCEL SIZE: 1.23 acres E 1STING IAN USE: Residence 1NIS1111tN; ZONING: A -1 -5 SUR1nJN1)ING LAND USE ACID 'ZONING NORTH: Agricultural and Residential Zoned R -1 EAST: Residential Zoned R -1 -T SCUI9L: Residential and Vacant land Zoned R -1 -5 and R -1 -T WEST: Residential and Vacant land Zoned A -1 -5 GENERAL PLAIN AND D[SIGNATICN: None TILL RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ON MAY 24, 1978 DETERMINED THAT THTS PROJL:CT WOULD IIAVP A NON- SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON 1'I1L•' ENVIRONMENT. - -- Water Service: Sower Service:: SLAW- )MUMNIMATTON: PLANNING COMI•IISSION ACTION: Y'lf' Staff Analysis: The applicant is requesting a zone change to the C -1 zone district .(neighborhood commerical) to allow the applicant to convert an existing residence into a restaurant. A restaurant with inci- dental serving of liquor is a permitted use in the C -1 zone. The applicant has not submitted a plot plan in conjunction with this request. The site is presently zoned A -1 -5. Surrounding zoning is A -1 -5 and R -1. The site is located on the south side of 19th Street, a secondary highway, approximately mid -block between Haven and Hermosa Avenues. To the east of the site is residential whereas to the west is agricultural and residential. Existing commercial n ^ar the site is approximately three - quarters of a mile to the west at Arc'iibald And 19th Street. Other com- mercial areas are Archibald and Baseline, 19th Street and Carnelian, Baseline and Carnelian and along Foothill Boulevard. Further, one proposal of the upcoming General Plan calls for commercial north- east of Haven and 19th Street, south of Chaffey College. In Staff opinion, the proposal would set a precedent for strip commercial on 19th Street between the site and Archibald. While Staff acknowledges that the specific use requested by the appli- cant may be in the interest of the city, Staff would recommend that the use occur at an existing commercial location in lieu of establishing a new commercial site. A site which is not located at an intersection, but mid -block in a residentially developing area. Further, Staff notes that the three sketch proposals for the general plan presently under consideration call for low den- sity residential (2 - 5 DU /GA) for the site. Findings : Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings: 1. Since the area is developing with residential uses, there is reasonable probability that the C -1 zone district will not be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered. 2. There is a probability of substantial detriment to or inter- ference with the future adopted general plan if the C -1 zone district is inconsistent w?th the general plan. 3. No development Plan has been filed concurrently with this zone change request. 4. The zone change will not be in the interest of furtherance of public health, safety and general welfare. 5. The zone change will set a precedence for strip commercial on 19th Street. l, �s Recommendation* Based upon - C-1 zone change not be approved. SU :. . Xl- r I • I a U- Lt 11 1': I I 1 .1. 1 I r ` ' '�.. �s r". -� / V°"p / (OU�d • nC. vim i.0` �(O17vrr+� 'Pr V � 1. �(�F�MhtMO '• � 1J kw4i 2§ Environminta lI 4rovement Agency (714) 383 -1719 j Planning Department Information (714) 383 -1372 6 14 17 1111 East hill Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415 '' + '' . �•1 d 1.''THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A: (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE: ME BELO'rI) It i 'r _LARGE SCALE S IIG PROJE . 1 kI_ •� ^2;- SITE APPROVAL (LOCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FLAN) . _ ZONE CiL4I10E MOBYY.EHOME PARK, RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PAPA, 5UBDIVISYON , y. TtrtiPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT - - SALES OFFICE AND /OR SUBDIVISION SI ' I_HINOR DEVIATION, t GOVT PROJECT,, Orin of Z.; 7 IrlY: TELEPHONE NUMBER .' `. APPLICaiNt' S BABE , 3! MAILING ADDRESS / / r i. r / 11 I. • ! . ! ZIP CODE /j/ ! 6. DATE .rr , r ' ASSESSOR PARCEL N0. (ft= tax bill) 1 $,! INDIVIDUAL To BE NOTIFIED OTDER THAN AFPLICANP . .� /•: `+1 .. (7 fir. .t•�':'r• .r. r.i / /t. � .. •' ^ •'r "/ s'l (/i( / ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE � 6.!,L. COMPLETE LEGAL DESCgYPTION OF' PROPERTY AND APPROETMATE SQUARE FOOTAGE OR ACREAGE. (Taken from Deeds) or Survey). 'fir %aj.'. ,! x . •t ' .. ., _ . rr r :;'f'i[• +' .l ), 1U'.11 oil /'iLir•f••- �'((7" -it) is /0r ;n a �"111.tr' .!� •IU1t Lr C'1 /: riff:, S.rV /e a p /Ir., a4 ;. .'tj s /.' .r.. .Irl/ 9PC• ..�,.ri lb ..I' /i C llr.....trr�r -°-'r '. -'--, rn• - 7. CMIPLaETE THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ON REVERSE SIDE: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY g, GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY. Indicating which side of the street, the propert)r's location fr near t street or interact ion and the town or cOMMity. „ 1 W 1`� I i, 9, DESCRII PROPOSED USE OF PERTX OR REASONS FOR TH S A I Orlg(nal Poor Quality APPLICATION FILING DATE.y 4 �l0�! u >r RECEIPT N0. & FEE) . .Il .�..p�' cf IR d .ONE CLASSIFICAT ��. -a ........ ( PAe'EL NO ...... .��.�.I.S.. ... P. B. D.F. FILING DATE.' JIi�rlt, �. GENEh.�L PLAN ASE...�!�.L�rl^f�....' (RECEIPT N0. &FEE). ? "•GENERAL PLAN RECOM.. A ti E.I.R. FILING DATE ................... .......... C'�}X" FT N0. &FEE) . 1 ~•.SPHERE OF INFLUENCE.. �� ..... (BEGET lA.t.U.0 t E L "E APPROVAL DATE ... M1+ M.S. NO............ .' •< t } CERTIF. OF COMPL. NO ....................... O. uslityl Enviroemental Improvement Agency (714) 383-1718 Flaming Department Information (714) 383-1372& 141 1111 East Mill Street, San Bernardino, C& 92415 'J.Ti'THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A: . (CHECK WE APPROPRIATE TYPE BELOW) SITE APPROVAL. (LOCATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN), LARGE SCALE HOUSING PROJECT HOBILEHOME PARK, RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK, SUBDIVISION, ZONE CHANG .I- ;1, TEMORARY OCCUPANCY' PERMIT SALES OFFICE AND/'0RSUBDMSION S IGN, ZONE K=R. DEVIATION,,: GOVT PROJECT, OTHER A-MaCANX @ S HUM 'r TELEPHONE NTIMER 11 r 'E, CODE -'3.', MAILING ADDRESS 11`77- lr.'-, �,F, ZI V91V L ASSESSOR MA15rM'f WA (from b 4 11 -4 T V 5.A.-INDIVIDUAL TO BE NOTIFIED 07EM THAN APP11C I '* ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE '71 6• C011711= LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND APPROXIMATE S(ZMkRE FOOTAGE OR ACREAGE. from Deed(s) or Su_-vey). ....... 11,, 7rr/ Olt 7ZA72 A7 19 Ab, Sial.e u,f billi 7 n "i geo-Arl -;-r beeb� -let;," r04ln! 7. 'CMM=, THE APPROP=Ti'SECTION ON REVERSE SIDE: (Taken qy Pt FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 8...*;GENERAL LOCATION OF pRopExv. indicating which side of the utreet, the Property's'! . location from nearest street or intersection and the town or community. 9. DESCRIBE PROPOSES USE OF PROPERLY OR REASONS FOR THIS AL71701: INDEX No ................................... . APPLICATION FILING DATE.,.. ....... ZONE CLASSIFICATION ............... ;1 ......... (RECEIPT NO. & FEF) ........................... PANEL NO ......... 6 ......................... P.E.D.F. FILING DATE.. GENERAL PLAN REF ................ (RECEIPT NO. & ............. GENERAL PLAN RECOM.. E.I.R. FILING ............. !SPHERE OF- INFLUENCE ........................ .(RECEIPT NO. & FEE) ...... A. L. U. r ............................... E.I.R. APPROVAL M.S. NO .................. *... & CERTIF. OF COMPL. N0. i. CAE ONLY TkiOSE SE TIONS THA ARPL TO YOUR TYPE APPLICATION yy° 'a. ,SITP APPROVAL (6acation snd Davnlopmnnt Plan): OJt����$' s Is a Zone Change being applied for_ -or- has -aj- Zone - Change been- withheld -pent in&- Da'•sl- — oprient- FltAS -on- your - property- wh'�oh- would- pesmih- your - proposed-- uwas(s): �YES� NOb�,•�•. ' S acts Mobilehome tnd Recreation Vehicle.parks Complete For Large Seale Housing projects, the following: Ir s AW �iS P1 Y '.. " +V' . Size of Parcel- (acres) Total Number of Unite UniCa Per Aese�, 4 1b. ZONE CHANGE REQUEST: (nvOuu Mf rt/a 'tr,rtr %tt i' f{ Present Zone Classification li -/ Proposad Zone Classification { ZONE VARIANCE MINDR DE�FIATION OR • :v Answer the following statements as to bow i *ag they apply to your•proposal:° , *• 1) Application for variance or deviation will not be detrimental to public welfare or other properties in the area. (Assuming eveyona in the area were allowed '• �.r to do what you have requested, explain why the resulting development would NOT be detrimental to the public good or reduce property values in the area, and ultimatelq results in better community developments.) '/, // '+ I' /" '! l" ........ � "/ Y ,I,l;p n�nrl -•• r•^ .! /�G' ••r... p,. {i r,1 in / I r. r I of 'ear--- r r/. r!•..n ..i // !' n ` .. • r• r ur. y —..v•� f 1, :A• / rr : /'r `Jf � /lC r�r). ";'rf�/4�.�t t.r.r 61�r f+.i P rf::'c C +. �/ /' %�� +I'I.7t'tY/2C 7�U7peq,{. L• vn,Luet. alvi r�,.e <+ C '1 I \ \\ P Sales Office and/or, Sign:,: , .h7 d. TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT (T.0. .) 1) Type of Sales Office: (see Check List), Dimensions of Sales Office,` 3'f "C" Gars a.Convarsion: In residence with off - street parking i g s'. ,- I ng fit, � ngn � In residence without off - street parking [� ID Portable Suildi 2) Dimensions of Siga Sign 'ICopyIl yi •lt 5 e I certify under penalty of perjury that I am the (check one) Legal Owner s) (all Individual owners must sign as their names appear on the deed to the land, Corpotate,l 4' Officers) emplowered to sign for the corporation, or 0 Owner's Legal Agent having Power of Attorney for this action, (a certified Power of Attorney document must ACCOMpany.r 4� the application form), and that the foregoing is true and correct, 'JY r �' Lisa ......a.• «al �/_�- .i1_ • \ ..r..�r. Mate) ' -'`e b.JCi i j i r:.y � •il c t:. ,d y p+ r (Data)' o f �; .. •` r + v r � •rte. 1 I .r .�1 5 i i PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION FORM,'• , • w� Odglnat P6cr'Quihth +; i w DATE FILED: data a The questions in this form are designed t to obtain enough d (,:•.Introduction: T staff and/or ERC to lf. adequately assess your project. B talon the time to f full respond to the questions r� below, ou can hel reduce the process ng t me or Your r ro e�ct. ou may also .V ¢, Tnc ude any additional informat on wh c you eelleve is p pertinent ,Use additionalt, 'E esheets where necessary. t' c' APPLICANT'S NAMc: /'1z• 'r !'b,�• lvccta f2. %anLn 2 2''';� , f` !`'TYPE O OF PROJECT OR ACTION: rr/i l nnnf ors taC a n w� a. Describe any product(s) that will be manufactured or processed by your }w' IT '� project and ,the .market it (they)wil ,'',s4erve`, J. 1 }rJ,, +iµ *, el �.ct \ �y ar.•. �t^"f Vr•',) , ' i �� + hit�t.'. �' '. �. +� 1 ' 11 �� i �rl •,� {r�i ��k t' I I N k S,.: t; G: , a 3. i 1 tit ' Oda, n' l p4QC't U �t i' PEOF » ..t'' ' b. Indicate the market that your units are designed to serve ` 2 ��y�� !' C. Discuss any phasing of your project on the.indica�:ed .s ite ori.insrelat on to a larger Project, (if.:one. exists). 1, d.. Size of Parcel (s) (acres) / Assessor's Parcel Number(s) t q `4+' r,rotai number of . units if ., ,x f,; Total number of lots Square footage of all S Y:. Height t of Att?Ft!?ed structure� ' ��fnrrr - /rtrc rt /a rrr�� nu Artr oCr,l Number of parking spaces e Area of P a ved surface / Total disturbed area ' Street(s) that provide access /nfA, .St, x ti• } e Air u t. F - Q alixy Information: Number and type of vehicles associated with completed,project "tf n.5 l �+= Odors emanatin g from project ,e) (typ ; A: _thous_ L22-1-racts or Subdivisions: ;.i'Fst2� M . Type of Units Planned' U A .7 /1:'" '/ •,� ; '�''' x, ,. Number. of Units of each type IYUrI('7,liiL.Sr s• Average floor area (livings ace o ' r _� t4 P ) �4each type :� /•.S r1Z7 /!;'S'LJ ge era Number cf 'lehicjes p11171Unit f IF ir ' /.' 7 l:" �' 4.� %. ! i, i , t � 4 t {,_ 4 ` },� Mil �, 1. , r:�w•i � `'x,14 ..`r.1: -.y.A l�1� ;. ' � \ \4fi '1' , ,yi�,+S.�.hs..%.. Y.cl 1 •'' ?� �i, T� i /i r{Nl'fn3 tY.(.'1tt �gt,'4,,�h ^i11fM'r 2 ", Olo I �Commerciat and Industrial pro ects.t. Types of emissions.,hnd sources, as 4 `'Electricity to be consumed by completed project in kwh/manth Natural gas'to be consumed by completed project in therms /month ..Lt' .., AV 1000 cubic feet/month_,�� ,''�-S'Any -other fuel sources (and amounts) to be consumed by completed icia e d q t 4,4:! " - 'f PEDF -3, ginal Poor'QualftT,,, " .'�I�50 M wi th.' project_. _ site Description. project . I Discuss any stream channels,or eroded areas on the site. q �7 site Description. ...... 2. Describe the site'as'tharaughly as possible. The following factors •f4 should b e consiaered: fi-;'�?'a.%--',Describi the type of vegetation and the percentage of the site that it J animals that covers. List the an you have seen or that are known to occur ,t4,7, o" the site b e topography (i.e., -'.-" Describe th slopes, landforms, landscape) of the site. ,i -Any data on soils and geology would also he helpful . I Discuss any stream channels,or eroded areas on the site. q �7 - r 6.A d:' ., Describe any:. r improvements 'on the si to t Ay Original Prior Q"If�f , . Y' Ir -1 e }`If your project site is located within 'a known archaeological resource a�.. (' area, you -may be required to provide documentation on the archaeological `f a potential of your site. The ERC will determine if such documentation is necessary, and may continue your project until the necessary study is performed. You may save time in the processing of your project by `A's'i- 'obtaining a letter or study an the archaeological status of your site r ; rPrior to the ERC meeting. You may contact the San Bernardino County, /• `t``:' Y h yl rt 'Museum (Dr, Gerald Smith, 7141825 -4825) to obtain a farm for conducting _4 ff }' this study and /or a list of qualified arganizations and individuals who :'•' i '+ • i pp •ti,+ct� rform, this service. Describe the agencies tha;_ are or will be providing the following services ! or utilities. Indicate whether these services are already provided to • the project site.` a'''rt Electricit .Sntr #hcrtn rr /i ? Fr /i.�t, _ �mrrrlrr �aovir�cc/ ,' �1`' •',. - tai,. Y , +:�'•, GAS iiL AL rt\ .1. 1 ,7, ^11 [„r'(•CC7•nlr••([ If'!. P/t. /�l�lr{J1AC.t. - ((. /ltQnn %( p.1n1• <.rA F1 .. 4laten � r M Sewage. Disposal S(i.•E is .76t Lit ifYi } ?•nafnet+ nienmial 1� ;G'C /GI Ji.),q U.14L1 �U. - J.anne'biR sY } J1te_Protection `l /fct l t>nrc 7us.e l)ep #. — ant, <o #ben. Fint. n mrforf inR r,•i /l Ge ubttcined aml tl i.,) -40&#v corl"A . td" 4 ii PEDF n'� t I vor Quiffity N q Describe e'i and,uses,.,o the adjacent In each direction.*. !Note any major or important natural or man-made"'features on the adjacent land; for example,major highways, stream channels, or other notable features. Where possible, provide a vicinity map showing the project site's relationship to these features. 11OAiCJdhrA*C cc Ruarnud Sold-A-.4-1 1-'CA(Yed' on fivthl YACV1 ( /(",44 St; . F� Jto. ,4:,',,'�"Describe the site alterations that will� be produced by your proposed project;I 1, . ti;. For instance, I ice, describe topographic changes, the percentage of the site that will be graded, storm flows that will have to be channelized, and other change 'Al Zug indicate a nek services or utilities that will be required as a resul J. of your project. Olden. AUMe. 6aili in 1y' 0( fo 6e convciti.ed inle) a -nwixlqan;f rccf J not Aat'a YO be !P7AUCd1[%d. San GAd AelLrwt AVA up oar 1))e rm/'. Fd;/;7'�"j LArd (vie-11 CzAe aljLeadu avai Identi fy any other agencies that you have contacted during the pmcnssinq of your project. Please include copies of correspondence with any state. federal or other local agencies or departments where the proposed project is discussed I i I 0 litur Wt.ggityy�stty, non. y ,:'�, �h.7:• 1 ,�, +::If'your: project requires'any permits .from other agent es, please identify the agency and type of permit. Some agencies or departments that you. may have *`!';. '41 to obtain permits from are ".listed below. .. Flacd Control) DistrietV ! t r% vt Dti• local Fire Protection Agency 6i�,'1; ,�� t:l.Air Pollution Control, ; y+ County Public Health Department e County Environmental Health Department R! County Airport land Use Commission era County Planning Department ' ' 1 State Regional Water quality Control Board r 1 State Real Estate Commission ''b' Federal agencies ,c rr5„4 Type of permit A. '�C,J ne'i. 'f cnliA !f enrl i, l,1.'1;1 7; fl7.1,wer-7i !, i nt• CIISd 7 Please include a copy of any studies (soils, geology, marketing, etc.)' °. that you may have had prepared .or this project or for this site. All reports will be returned at the end of your project's raview,.if requested'Y? Ijo h, .1 :t. r Tit h' { 1l ;' ` Propor nr or ll•fnel • Datec F - -T •. q•t` S'� 6 •LAt111111G CON!,11.85100 HEARING DA'Z'E: June 8, 1978 AGENDA I1.'EM 110. � FAP 88 ROUTINE ITE14 XXX wa,ovI' PIt1:PARt]) By, J. Perevuznik I••ltlt) NON- ROUTINE ITEM 1tANCI[O CUCN-IONGA 0i TIME OF ITEM PLANNING COt•1NISSION P a: "`?,• -,= ���QG,lS Lie C4 1 ARt'JA: Etiwanda F11,U /TNDEX NO: Minor Subdivision No. W78 -0025 PRO[C15AL: Appeal to reverse County Planning Director action lax.iV9•LON: Southwest corner of Victoria. Ave. and East Ave. APPI.ICA[J'r: Alfredo C. Murillo iNC;[r1t ('1t/AI.(1IT'1[z ' t': none FAP 88 PUBLIC HRI —�A EANG r1('ncrs sum ON t..... - 70 __... , ..,.. a .. wa,ovI' PIt1:PARt]) By, J. Perevuznik I••ltlt) 0i PATKT-1. SIZr: 5 acres 1 ;XISPIrIG U%rin USE: - Vacant and undeveloped P a: "`?,• -,= ���QG,lS SUHWUNTDING LAND USE tale ZONING . ;' NORMI: Residential 33 "- __- =: -• - _ -- Zoned R -1 BAST: Rural Residential Etiwanda =� Zoned R -1 Scum: Rural Residential — Zoned R -1 WEST: Agriculture ,� X10 Zoned R -1 �! O62 G'[:•IE1tkL PLAN AND DEST(;NAriom: -LL, - _ - r -r Proposed Rancho Cucamonga General Plan in planning stage: Conditions described in Government Code 65302.5 (b) (4) (B) exist THE ENVIROWMENTA1. R[:V[EI.1 * ON DETERMINED _ THAT THTS PROJECT td0U1,U t:J�Vli A — [•a'FFCT ON THE *ADMINISTRATIVELY EXEMPT �:,,JL':_I _ N,m- :- :ul,Ix�rt rlo Caun.:nl• Watcr : :'-vicc: Cucamonga Co. W er X X (Fire) ScwL,!r Service: Septic Tai — �..i STA[T 1tIX:U•.11T:DATTOII: PLANNING CORMISS10N ACTION: Original Poor Quallby it J v._. Staff Analysis: Minor Subdivision application was submitted to create four (4) lots from an existing five (5) acre parcel. The application was not approved as submitted, but an alternate design consisting of two (2) parcels was --ondit onally approved on April 28, 1978 (see attached plat map and conditions) . The applicant is appealing the County Planning Director action and requesting the Planning Commission to approve the original design. This application was not approved as submitted because all of the required findings in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance No. 18 were not met. The Ordinance requires that a statement be made that there will be adequate facilities according to State standards, to service the projected elementary and high school population from the proposed development. At the time this application was considered for approval, Chaffey Joint Union High School District had an ever- capacity student enrollment at Alta Loma High School. This high school is on an extended nine - period schedule. A temporary solution to the redistricting of high school boundaries was resolved on June 5, 1978 by the School Board members. Nzw homes under construction in the Rancho Cucamonga area will create additional students, staining the exiting enrollment capacity of the Alta Loma Hin School. This application by it- self will not create a hard-;hip on Alta Loma Hi:?h School, but the accumulative assessment of all minor subdivision sp^l_ cations in conjunction with tentative tract previously ar,,,-roved mliet be considered. In addition to the high school issue, the Cucamonga I9ater District has stated that there is adequate waterline and water storage capacity, but that this pertains to domestic usage only and is not interpreted as a guarantee of fire flow capacity as required by the Foothill Fire District. Fire protection to development on the property will be adversely affected without adequate fire flow capacity. Staff Position: A. Findings: 1. There may not be adequate facilities according to State standards to service the projected high school population from the proposed development based on a cumulative assessment of all projects previously approved. 2, That by the time of occupancyr there may not be a guarantee of adequate fire flow capacity required by the Fire . District jurisdiction to serve the proposed development, n Staff Position: (wont.) A. Findings: (cont.) 3, That by the time of occupancy, traffic originating from ' the proposed development will not cause a serious traffic circulation problem. A. That by the time of application for building permits, the proposed development will be resonably protected from one hundred year floods. 5. That by the time of occupancy, electricity and telephone service will be available to the proposed development. 6. That by the time of occupancy, adequate domestic water line and domestic water storage capacity will exist to serve the proposed development. 7. That by the time of occupancy, no connection to a sewer collection system is required, because the size of the proposed lots will permit individual subsurface sewage disposal. B. Recommendations: 1. Staff recommends that the Planning Director action approving two (2) lots in lieu of the requested four lots be upheld. 2. If spec ifc evidence and facts are presented during the !rearing and findings made as to how the school issue can be mitigated and fire flow capacity resolved to warrant Planning Commission approval is this appeal, Staff recommends that the following additional requirement be added to tLe original conditions: Paving, curb and gutter with circular drives required for proposed parcels 1, 2 and 3 along Victoriet Avenue. Plans for all improvements mrst be approved by the city of Rancho Cucamonga Engineer prior to installation of the said improvements. A cash deposit or bond may be placed with the City to fulfill this requirement. .� LAND DIVISWN APPLICATION r SAN BERNARDINO COUPIIY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Vt_!! /cr /' I' /`aTC � r� e� / +'• �.arii7 d� /�'C �� !'rJ/l�r� .f ri. - r/ppir � � ��d/ � A+ /� d� /� ✓�Cr per.• /ter. A PP LICAI'M Name ALI Phone 3711L_ Address /al bs MLot& Z,4� (Almoo 91710 LEGAL Cam. ZP. 0: :.ECCSA: Na,e -$ /,I C. / Il .•, L/e _ Phone kl l� �T N A NQR it 1,N - 11o:r Map Seale /(Office Use Only) L. D. NO, (�, / C�G� zQ;E — ' i�` 36L6S� 3aGPs 3t9 sly I' /`aTC � r� e� / +'• �.arii7 d� /�'C �� !'rJ/l�r� .f ri. - r/ppir � � ��d/ � A+ /� d� /� ✓�Cr per.• /ter. A PP LICAI'M Name ALI Phone 3711L_ Address /al bs MLot& Z,4� (Almoo 91710 LEGAL Cam. ZP. 0: :.ECCSA: Na,e -$ /,I C. / Il .•, L/e _ Phone kl l� �T N A NQR it 1,N - 11o:r Map Seale /(Office Use Only) L. D. NO, (�, / C�G� zQ;E — ' ~ CITY OF RANCHO `-'UCh!•IO; G4% MINOR SUBDIVISION APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COWHISSION (PREF4RE IN DUPLICATE). Application No.- W75 -0025 At frnd� r:& Claxa J, Murillc APPLICANT 14F,65 nnr_r Vista_Ayp. ADDRESS Chino, CA 91710 (714) 6:8-3711 DATE STAl p PHONE NU.IIIER NATURE OF APPEAL: *(Check appropriate box) " Q I hereby appeal Planning, Director denial dated I hereby reatest waiver /modi'icat -on of conditions assigned by Planning Director approval dated ttay 1, 1978 Condition(s): 1. split. 2. 3. RE?sON FOR APPEAL: WAIVER: MODIFICATION: ication of a STAFF R, trTF- Q A- Nn RECOM LEE IDe?TION: ,r {'. Lr •. Attachment to Minor Subdivision Appeal 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga The Planning Commission REASON FOR WAIVER: in accordance with emergency Ordinance 18 enacted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 29, 1978, with respect to the providing of services for water, sewer, fire and schools, We hereby appeal a portion of the school require - went. Adequate water, sewer and fire protection hava been given and are already on file with the county. Two- thirds of the school requirement has been compiled with as required by the ordinance. 6tiwanda School District has submitted to the County a letter indicating adequate room space within the school district for the possible number of students generated by this minor subdivision. Chaffey Joint High School District, as of this date, has given uc neither an apnroval or a denial. They are c:iryc ^tly engaged in establijhing either new high school boundaries or other proposal% to deal with Alta Loma High School. over- crowding. We fee?, that cansideration should be given with respect to . what we actually intend to do with the property and the effect we £e¢:1 we will have on the high school situation. �r- I LAND DIVISIUN APPLICATION SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT w A -,t 1 -., ,./ G. yr .. 3l9 3/y VAI 3e APPLICANT : Name Airree!2 C. /)l uloui t, Phone Address / i4G� i)Jun /r Ci'/a�.. —� C'hlelo 171wo LECAL OWNER OF RECOP.D: Name AEL( /I, C, /) umd/o Phone Ga a- 71- Al NQRSH I.N J7-n Al Map Scala (Office Use Only) L. D. N0. C< 72 — C >C_'VS ZONE —X ' ROAD NAP BOOK PAGE NO. Z.( of FEE RECEIPT NO.�_ Director Action May 1, 1278 M.S. W78 -0025. 1 Eleven (11) foot grant of easement to the County of San Bernardino. 2 required for Victoria Avenue to provide forty -four (44) foot half - 3 width right -of -way as shown on Minor Subdivision plat map. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31_ 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 " 53 .54 S6. Eleven (11).foot grant of easement to the County of San Bernardino required for East Avenue to provide forty -four (44) foot half -width .ight -of -way as shown on Minor Subdivision plat map. Twenty (20) foot radius of return offer of dedication required for rounding the corner as shown on the Minor Subdivision plat map. Upon completion of all other conditions, a Parcel ttap of the proposed division shall be recorded with the County Recorder pursuant to pro- visions of the State Map Act. (Note: This map :oust be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer.) An advance copy of the Parcel Map may be submitted to the County Surveyor to ex- pedite checking, but the County Surveyor will not accept the linen for presentation to the County Recorder for filing until notified by the Planning Director that your Minor Subdivision application is in order for final approval.- The Parcel Map is required due to insufficient survey data recorded with the County of San Bernardino. The following are Flood Co:ttrol District RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY, and are not to be considered as requirements. (Applicant is advised to forward these recommendations to the prospective- purchasers of these lots.). 1. A Registered Civil Engineer should investigate and design ade- quate drainage facilities to intercept and conduct the flows around or thzvagh the site at the time the site is developed. 2. Any future building pads should be elevated above natural ground to reduce damage due to overflow. 3. A topographic map should be provided to facilitate the design and review of necessary drainage facilities at the time the site is developed. 4. Adequate provisions should be made to intercept and conduct the tributary drainage flows around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties at the time the site is developed. Applicant shall comply with the attached Foothill Fire District requirements. This action is subject to appeal to the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Com- mission for a period of .thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this notice. The appeal must be made in writing on forms available from this office. If there are any questions regarding this matter,' please feel free to contact this office at 714/383 -3691. ?LANNING COMMISSION HEAR* DATE: June 28, 1978 s RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLA14NING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA ITEM NO. ROUTINE ITEM XXXXX NON - ROUTINE ITEM TIME OF ITEM ,1F�,: Rancho Cucamonga FILE /NDE( NO: Site Approval Index No. N96 -89 PFCE`SAL: Location and Development plan to establish a school LC01TICN: td /s of Archibald, 281 feet S/o 8th St. APPLICA:`Ir: Barbara Salyer E +GI ','==JAFCHITMT: :'.6 PUBLIC HFARNG mCrrICsS Sufi' CN 6-16 -78 R_ :Rr PFI A.R.) BY: Doug Payne FI= IiSPECrICN TLNM: DATE' CF LNSPECrICN: P.tJ*ML SIZE: A • 3 acres E is,ri_n3 LA2Z) USE. Abandoned school building and associa E{ISTIXG ZCtlr,,G: MR BSI Si;R.R_l_',�Ic:G C ?`ID USE AND ZCPIII'IG NOSCH: Residential, I Zoned MR EAST: Residential, P�Fsw nF 1 Zoned R -1 yM51 T6I�,+ SCtTPH: Vacant, Zoned MR ticST: Residential and Vacant, Zoned MR �^4F' +17u FL,%N AZM DES7GZIATIC)N: N/A vq V f 6 I I!(�mn °_IiE PLANNING COI•II4ISSION ON JUNE 19, 1978 DETERMINED T!iA: TIIIS PROJECT t•.'OULD EA'!E A�=SIGNFrC�CNT EFFECT On THE ENVIRONMENT. +rater 'Scvrice: Se.'er Servxoe- `� S '117 PMCM- T- VDATICN: PLANNING COC•I:- 1ISSIOU ACTION: Staff Analysis: The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a school in the MR (restricted manufacturing) zone district as permitted Section 61.0219(f)(4) of the zone code. Schools are not normally permitted in said zone. The site is improved with an abandoned building which was used approximately twenty years ago for school purposes. Other improvements found on the site include a parking area, shed, garage and existing landscaping. The site fronts on Archibald, a major arterial. In most cases, school uses are not recommended in industrial areas due to possible adverse traffic, noise and air quality conditions. The site, however, has some positive qualities and may be suitable for school pruposes. An industrial park was recently approved on the property to the south of the site. Approved design features of said park include parking area with a block wall along the property line for the first two- hundred eight feet from Archibald. west of the parking a-,:ea there will be storage units that back up the site. There. are no openings from the storage area onto the site. While the zone district would permit various frcros of industrial use on the properties to the north and west, th_,, are presently improved with residences and have lot sizes and shapes that are not conducive to major industrial use. In providing for the existing and potential industrial uao on surrounding properties, the applicant has clustered the buildings that are to be used for classrooms. ius increasing their distance from adjacent parcels and provides open space for a buffer. Other buffering proposals include intensive landscaping of thn parking area and play area. .Landscaping is proposed on the north and east to mitigate noise generated by Archibald and the railroad located three - hundred ten feet to the north. The applicant is also proposing to install walls to reduce the noise levels. To provide sarety for the students and to reduce traffic conflicts on Archibald caused by traffic generated by the use, the applicant shall designate drop -off and pick -up areas on the northwest portion of the parking area. To further reduce traffic conflicts, there will be no Pedestrian access gates on the front of the ,school through the existing chain- link fence. y, c_ 'Findings Recommended by Staff: Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings: 1. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the school facility and all required yards, open spaces, setbacks, walls, fences, parking areas, landscaping and other features required by this approval. 2. Archibald provides the site with adequate access. 3. when property is buffered, the school'should not have an adverse effect on abutting properties nor should it dis- courage their eventual development to industrial use. 4. Adequate service capacity exists to serve the site. The school will utilize the existing septic facility for sewage disposal. 5. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment or interference with the future adopted general plan if the school is ultimately inconsistent with the general plan. Recommendation: Based upon the findings and analysis. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Location and Development Plan. Staff would further suggest that the approval be con - ditioned upon the following: 1. The applicant shall install a minimum of two (2) specimen trees in the planter areas located at the end of the parking aisle and one (1) specimen tree in each designated tree well. Additional shrubs ao d trees installed along the north and east property line and within the area designated as playground. Trees and shrubs shall be installed around all buildings except existing carport. A permanently instal - led irrigation system shall be required for all landscaped areas. Landscape plan shall be subject to Planning Director approval. 2. Unless previously provided (or, the applicant shall install a solid wall along the north and south property line for a distance of three hundred feet from Archibald. 3. Designate a location within the north portion of the park- ing area for student pick -up and drop off. Said location shall be appropriately striped. 4. A Fence shall be required along the frontage of the site. No Pedestrian access gates will be permitted in said fence. 5. The applicant shall install a sidewalk along Archbald for the w;.dth of the site. ji u �• Recommendation: (cont.) 6. Fire access lane shall be free of trees and bushes. 7. Obtain an inspection from department of Building and Safety for possible asbestos insulation. Said insulation f- shall be removed. B. The parking area shall be appropriately striped per code. 9. Nall mounted sign only to be approved by the Planning' Director. 10. A Eix (6) inch high concrete curb shall be provided to separate all landscape areas from driving surface. 11. If food is to be served routinely on the subject premises, the applicant shall submit the plan of the kitchen facility to the Department of Environmental Health Services or equivalent for approval. 12. The applicant shall connect to the community sewer system when treatment capacity is available. 13. Any lighting provided to illuminate the site shall be hooded and so arranged as to reflect the liqht away from adjoining residential premises and public thoroughfares. 19. Applicant shall ascertain and comply with requirements of all State, County and local agencies as are applicable to the project area. AEAlUNG UATL' - June '.4, 1078 AGENDA ITEM NO.�3.� ROUTINE ITEM Xx K •.' NON- ROUTINE ITEM RANCIfO CUCAMONGA TIME OF ITEM PLANNING COI•iMISSION • I AN111: Cucamonga rTIT /INDEX NO: Minor Subdivision No. W78- 0230 -I PIUMSAL: Industrial tract consisting of 15 .lots on 20.8 acres =NTION: Northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. AP.LicANr: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. FNGINrUVARC11111)CT: Associated Engineers N/A PUPLIC IWAI ING NUr10ES Swr ON 16-1'OTtr PIU-TAKII) BY: John PerevuzniTC FU ID IN.SPL•X'CION TEAM: DATE Or INSPI•JCrICN PARCEM SI?.C: 20.8 acres M/L ` Fa1s•riw W5) USE: Vineyard I:CiS1'IN!; 7.+7N1NC;: M -2 FJm I I SUIUiGUP)ING 1r.M) USE AZZ) ZONING _ � ^�_ ' �___- ��•� - -N�• "_ �I - - -� ` NORfl1: Vacant, undeveloped, M -2 EAST: Undeveloped, proposed Industrial, i7_2 t.. �T .. •Y ' Industrial uses, M -2 "�• °— ' yl.T WEST: Winery, Driving Range, M- 2rr�:�..mr?T..h'40z 4` QNERAL PLAN MR) DESIGNATION: Proposed Rancho Cucamonga General Plan is in planning stage. Conditions described in government code 65302.5(6)(4)(B) exist. TIM ENVII:OWIiNTA1. IIEVIEW ON J£TERMINED , :'1'11 OJISCT 110ULD 1 :01S A EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Water '; rvicr: Scwcr Servicc: �• SCAF-F W-)`O MENDATTON: Approve, subject to attached cor4itiOns PLANNING CODJMISSION AC111ION: �'t•. Staff Analysis: ., Applicant is requesting approval to create 16 industrial lots for sale or lease to future industrial users. The proposed submitted design designatcs a 40 foot private road easement for access to parcels 4 thru 9 and direct access from Haven Avenue to par- cels 1 thru 3. The ultimate right-of-way for Haven Avenue will be 134 feet and the County Transportation Department recoavands that access rights be relinquished on Haven Avenue by appropriate dedication. Access to exterior parcels to be provided by a 50 foot wide road terminating in a standard cal- de-sac to be located between parcels l thru 3 and 4 thru 6 as shown on at- tached Minor Subdivision Plot Map. Findings as Recumrraded by Staff: Based upon submitted data and recommendations from other County Agencies, Staff reccnmends that the Planning Canni.ssion make the following findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted County- Wide and the proposed City Community General plans, both textual and mapped. 2. Adequate se -vice capacity exists, has been reserved, or will be available at such time as the project is completed or within a reasonable acceptaole time frame for fire pro - tection, drainage and circulation. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of density and development. 4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvement are not likely to cause E+ibs•tantial environmental damage 7. or substantially and avoidable injure fish and wildlife and their habitat. 5, The design of the subdivision or type of proposed improve- `` ment are not likely to cause serious -public health problems or.cause threat to life and property from a wildfire con - I, flagration. 6. The proposed subdivision; its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the conditions im- posed by the County Subdivision chapter, the regulations of the County Zoning chapter and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law. Recommendation: Bawd upon the above listed findings, Staff would make the fol- lowing recommendations: 1. That a Negative Declaration be adopted and that the Secre- tary be instructed to file a Notice of Determination. 2. That the City Council ;tPPROVE Minor Subdivision W78- 0230 -I as depicted on attached plot map subject to the attached conditions: toe ,;, 161 I3 0 ti u b LAND DIVISION AkIPLICATION PAAA r! AP A/C ?. 1.9911 Jo A'AII J[oAy ACLEts 4r:AsCAf6NY ® Q) 111 G :I (D _InR^ FFXJSTJNO 4MAIMAyE m AVAZ9 LOT AREAS V ~I 4 ,3 11I 311 ,S 1. 43, 485 S. F. or 1.00 Acre S. 2. 43, 570 S. F. or 1.00 Acre 9. 3. 43, 570 S. F. or 1. 00 Acre 10. 4. 4.1, 455 S. F. or 1.02 Acres 11. 5. 44, 455 S. F. or 1. OZ Acres IZ. 6. 44, 455 S. F. or 1. 02 Acres 13. 7. 43, 485 S. F. or 1. 00 Acre 14. 15. APPLICANT: Name Crowell/ Leventhal, Inc._ Phone(7i4)981 -104i� Address 1260 W. Foothill ISlvd., Upland, CA. 9178b ;'..LEGAL OWNER OF RE-CORD: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. (714) 981 -1041 Name Phone 1260 W. Foolllill 1111' 1. , Upland CA. 91786 , 4.1 jS tp n..;rr. A 9 I I 43, 570 S. F. or 1 Acre 43, 570 S.F. or 1 Acre 55,675 S: F. or 1. 28_Acres 55,675 S.F. or 1'.28 Acres 55, 590 S.F. or 1. 28 Acres 107, 100 S. F. or 2. 46 Acres 41TIDL 107, 100 S. r. or 2. 46 Acres NQRt-n m 107, 100 S, F. or 2. 46 Acres ry n �QP• Map Scale Office Use only) L.D. N0. /c17t4 ^023f� T ZONE ' H- 2 ROAD MAP BOOK PACE NO. PEE RECEIPT NO.3�69 yes- •���L. rr I 2 3 4 5 6 7 x 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Is 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2') 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 .14 45 46 47 48 49 50 sI 52 S3 R,:. 56 ninor s"ivision W78- 0216LI Page ! of 5 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1- Tin water system and fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with requirements of the State Health and safety code, and in accordance with plans approved by the San 33er'nardino County Deparbent of Environmental Health Services and the governing fire protection authority. 2. Basements and irr,.)rovements shall be provided and drainage coordinated in accordance w:..th tjie standards and requirements of the County of Sari Bernardino and the County Planning Commission. 3• inhere a bond is to be posted in lieu.of installation of the improvement: A. . The domestic water plan and /or sewer plan shall be reviewed by a civil engineer, registered in the State of California and said engineer shall determine the amount of bond necess.ry to install the improvements. This amount plus ten percent shall be posted with the County of San Bernardino, B- The presently required certificates on water maps for the water company a1s1 engineer must still be placed on the map. In addition,. a statement shall be transmitted to the Public Health Department signed by the Registered civil engin?cr for the water purveyor stating that the amount of bond recommended is adequate to cover the cost of installation of the improvement. C- Further, prior to release: of the bond for the improvement, the engineer for the subdivider or the utility of jurisdiction shall submit a signed statement cunfirrung that the improvement has been installed according to the approved plans and meets the requirements of all appropriate State and7 County laws pertaining to such improvement. It is the developer's tesponsibility. that such signed statement is filed with the County Department of Environmental Health Services. D. In cases where the water agency or sr_wering agency is a governmental subdivision, prior to final recordi.rig of the tract map, the governmental agency shall sutmi.t a statement directed to the County stating that the improvement has been installed according to the approved plans or stating that the bond -'n the amount of 110 percent of tho cost of installation of the ingrovement has been placed with the agency. . 9- A comnitm nit'shall ne obtained, in writing, from the sewering agency. Said cor- ratm:m:t to ind'.cabe d at the agency has the capacity to furnish said sewer service to the subject project, and that all ne::ssary arrangements have been made with void agency to supply such services. ' A copy of the commitment to be, filed with the Planning Department. 1.y MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. W78- 0230 -I (Cucamonga) Page 2 of 1 * STREET, GRADING AND DRAINAGF. REQUIREMENTS: , 2 3 County Transportation hepartment: 4 5 Paving, curbs and gutters shall be installed on Haven Avenue, 6 Jersey Blvd., and Atica, and cul -de -sac road. Plans for all 7 improvementstnust be approved by the City Engineer prior to 9 installation of said improvements. A cash deposit or bond may be 10 placed with the City to fulfill this requirement. 11 ' 12 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated for Haven Avenue. 13 14 Sixty (60) foot offer of dedication required for Utica Street. 15 16 Twenty (20) foot radius of return offer of dedication required 17 for rounding the corner on Utica Street and cul -de -sac road. 18 19 County Flood Control District: 20 21 A topographic map should be provided to facilitate the design 22 and rca-iew of. necessary drainage facilities at the time the 24 24 site is developed. 25 26 The natural drainage courses traversing the site not be occupied 27 or onstructed. = 2b 29 Adequate provisions should be made to intercept and conduct the 30 tributary drainage flows around or through the site in a manner 31 - which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties 32 at the time the site is developed. y" 33 34 Future building pads should be elevated above natural ground 35 to reduce damage due to overflow. 36 37 County Surveyor: 38 39 Upon completion of all other conditions, a Parcel Map of the 40 proposed division shall be recorded with the County Recorder 41 pursuant to provisions of the State Map Act. (NOTE: This map 42 must be prepared by a licensed laud surveyor or a registered 43 44 civil engineer.) An advance copy of the Parcel Map may be 45 submitted to the County Surveyor to expedite checking, but the 46 County Surveyor will not accept the linen for presentation to the 47 County Recorder for filing until notified by the Planning 48 Director that your Minor, Subdivision application is in order for 49 final approval. 50 51 The Parcel Map is. required due to insufficient survey data 52 recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 53 54 I 55 I' 56 Minor subdivision No. W78- 0230 -I (Cucamonga) Page 3 of S. 1 *In addition to the Street and Drainage requirements, other "on -site" 2 or "off - s.'tell improvements may be required which cannot be determined 3 from tentative plans and would have to be determined after more 4 complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to the 5 County Transportation Department. 6 7 8 COUNTY FIREWARDEN: 9 Tire flow will be determined by this department upon receipt 10 11 of the following information: 12 13 a. Two (2) sets of plans, 14 b. Type of roof covering, I5. C. Number of stories. 16 17 Calculations indicating that the fire flew requirement will be 18 met shall hie submitted to this department prior to plan 1� approval. 20 21 Water mains and appurtenances Quill be installed in accordance 22 with the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District. 23 24 This deparmiet.t shall be notified to witness an acceptance test 25 of the mater system prior to construction of any building(s) 26 or structrxe (s) . 27 28 Fire hydrant assemblies shall be installed in accordance with 30 1 requirements of this district. 0 31 - Fire hydrants shall be installed prior to commencing cons truc- 32 tion of any building (s) or structure (s), and shall be approved 33 34 wet barrel type only. 35 36 All streets anu cul -de -sacs shall meet the minimum San Bernardino 37 County Transportation Department standards. 39 39 Streets leading to cul -de -sacs or dead ends shall not exceed 40 600 feet in length. In the event these streets are redes-igned 41 in any manner, the 600 foot length shall be maintained on all 42 resubmitted plans (tentative or final). 4: 4'. COUNTY PLANNING D °PARTMENT: 4' 46 Street lighting shall be provided throughout the tract including . 47 all peripheral streets. ; 48 49 uti.licy lines shall be placed underground in accordance with the so requirements of County ordinance No. 2041. 51 52 The existing zoning is.M -2. 53 54 55 :. 56 A jt.,`� •A A./�, nr. _. — _ - _.... _ _. .set- 'A MINOR SUBDIVISION No. W78- O2311-I (Cucamonga) Page 4 of !F Prior to- recordation of the parcel map, all required walls and ilandscaping shall be completed or suitable binds posted for their_ completion. Bonds shall he posted with the Planning Department. 4 5 Three (3) copies of a final Grading Plan shall be submitted for 6 'Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of I grading permits, where finished perimeter slopes are proposed x i adjacent to existing development, or when graded slopes exceed five (5) feet in vertical height. Graded slopes shall be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 13 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical height of 30 feet. IsGraded slopes shall be contour - traded to belnd with existing tc, natural contours and developed with a minimum radius at inter- s, sccting horizontal planes of two (2) feet, (measured one (1) 18 foot from the top or toe of slope) and a maximum horizontal length to of two hundred (200) feet. +� The surface of all cut slopes more than five (5) feet in height and fill slopes more than three (3) feet in height shall be ,i protocted against damage by erosion by planting with grass or _.t around cover plants. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in +a vorlical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to a::ceed ten (10) fei�:t on centers; or trees, spaced at not to 27 exceed ten (10) feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to 28 exceed twenty (20) feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs Zt) and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting zn methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic con- 31 ditons of the site: ' t 54 SS 56 ' ." t N. 32 33 Trees 108 - 15 gal.; 402 - 5 gal.; 508 - 1 gal. 34 Shrubs 208 - 5 gal.; 808 - 1 gal. i5 Ground Cover - 1008 coverage. 36 37 Three copies of a Landscaping Plan reflecting the above require - 3s ments and placement of.street trees (if required) If) shall be submitted for Planning Director Review and approval. . 4n .it The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be 32 the responsibility of the developer and guaranteed until the 4:1 transfer to individual ownership or until the maintenance is : a4 officially assumed by a County Service Area. 45 sr, All irrigation systems where required shall be designed on an individual lot basis unless comm.%nly maintained in an approved ie :. 49 9 manner. ' S0 51. Prior to recordation of the parcel. map, four (4) copies of a 52 Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted .' the L4anning UO t` Director for review and approval. t 54 SS 56 ' ." t N. r 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 . 32 33 74 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 •45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ,53 MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. W78- 0230 -1 (Cucamonga) Page S of 6 Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, a letter from the serving water and sewer agency shall be submitted certifying that capacity for Minor Subdivision W78 - 0230 -I has been re- served for a minimum period of one (1) year. Interior access shall be redesigned to provide a fifty (50) foot street terminating in a 47 foot radius cul -de -sac in lieu of the proposed 40 foot private easement located between lots four through six and seven through nine. Said fifty foot street shall be relocated between proposed lots one through three and four through six. -r. I,, Y -.. - %,s r•d s. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 9161 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 q4 i:_> ed Tiiek�, June 13, 1978 SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision Number W78- 0230 -I June 14, 1978 Planning Commission Hearing Agenda Item Number 3 Gentlemen: Please be advised that we are presently attempting to identify, contact and secure industrial and manufacturing companies which will establish their plants on the acreage owned by Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. on Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. When such a'firm expresses an interest in a portion of the property, we attempt to provide it with a parcel in a size suitable to its needs to- gether with the required physical improvements including, buildings, parking facilities, landscaping and other amenities. Because we do not presently know the future client's physical requirements, we request that you allow us to retain as much flexibility in future development as pos3- ible. We respectfully request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comm- ission modify the requirements attached to the San Bernardino County Planning Department's recommendations as follows: 1. Pa a 1, lines 44 throu h 49: (Standard Requirements Number 4). Please elete thas condition regarding the sewer letter as it has been fulfilled by the attached Cucamonga County Water District letter dated June 13, 1978- 2. Pa a 2, line 12: Please modify this requirement to rear: "Vehicle access rights shall be dedicated for Haven Avenue except that one commercial driveway will be allowed at the property line between Lot 2 and Lot 3. 3. Page 3, line 36: Please modify the requirement to read "All public streets...." 4. Page 4, lines 1 thjrowgh 52: Please delete this entire page as the provisslops pertain pimarily to single family residential developments in hilly areas. As our property is to be developed as individual industrial lots and as the terrain is extremely flat, the property's north boundary and south boundary, 500 feet apart, differ in elevation by ten feet, we feel these requirements are not really applicable. We BUILDERS-DEVELOPERS 1260 W. Foothill Blvd. a Upland, Califomia 91786 a Telephone (714) 981 -1041 • State License No. 225705 _F :..0 Page 2 r Mty of Rancho Cucamonga 'e Planning Commission Minor Subdivision Number W78- 0230 -I suggest the following conditions be substituted: a. Occupancy permits on affected lots shall be withheld until the installation of any required landscaping, irrigation and walls is completed or an adequate surety bond is posted. b. Cut and fill slopes over three feet in height and the parkway adjacent to Haven avenue shall be land- scaped in accordance with city standards at such time as the adjacent parcels are developed. 5. Page 5_ lines 1 through 4: Please delete this condition as it is not applicable as Rancho Cucamonga City Ordinance presently makes provision for water and sewer to be available before a building permit can be issued. 6. Page 5�lin�es 6 through 11: Please modify this condition to add - It o' -3 naliy read- --said access to be guaranteed prior to the close of escrow of any lots numbered l through 6." The possibility.exists that a manufacturing firm may want to acquire all or substantially all of the parcels 1 through 6 for its industrial facilities. Requiring that the private street be constructed now may conflict with our flexibility to satisfy large manufacturers. We propose that we or any successor in interest be required to provide the private street as necessary to provide legal or physical access to any future buyer of an individual lot. Your consideration of our requee:ts will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, CROWELL /LEVENTHAL, INC. David R. Benton Industrial Division DRB:mb cc: John Perevuznik, San Bernardino County Planning Department `u4 iy4 CUCAMiONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 11641 BAN BERNARDINO $10. • CUCAMONGA. CALM 91730 CHARLES T. PATH. Pr..i4lAt June 12, 1978 P.O. BIN 638 • 967.2591 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9340 Baseline Road Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Availability of Water and Sewer Service for band Division No. 78 -02301 Industrial Development - Northeast Corner of Haven and .jersey Boulevard Gentlemen: yiMpr kl"I ARTHUR H. BRIDGE lm,oga". G"ffii No"g;w LLOYD W. MICHAEL rlrrttm FRANK LESINBKY ROBERT NFSBIT GALER RO'YER The above mentioned property is entitled to water service from this District, and said service is subject to pipe- line extension policies, rules, regulations and rate ordinances of this District. Adequate waterline and water storage capacity exists and will exist to serve the above referenced property at the time of occupancy. in addition, the sewer system capacity and the sewer treatment plant capacity will be sufficient to serve the above mentioned property at the time of occupancy. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA CO TT/yYpWATE DISTRICT /are Hcipal Engineering Aide bf PLANNING MkUSSION HEARING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Y }r June 14, 1978 ROUTINE ITEM xx� NON- ROCT1'INE ITEM TAPE REF. NO.. RANCHO CDCAMONGA PLJ4NNING COMMISSION ,t AREA: Cucamonga FILE,/h-MEX NO; Minor Subdivision 8 W78 -0245 I PROPOSAL: Industrial Tract consisting of 6 lots on 3.53 acres• LCCATICN: South side of 9th Street Approximately 600 ft. west of Hellman Ave. AppLICA,T: Michael 'Dodd ENGINEER/ARCIi11 p; D.C.D. Group N/A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES SENT ON REPORT PREPARED BY: J. PereVUTnik FIFrn INSPECTION TEAM: DATE Cr INSPECTION: PARCEL SIZE: 3.53 acres EXISTING IAND USE: Vacant and Undeveloped EXISTING ZONING: MR = •••..•••• J�. i �f1.. t• SURRC(]NIDING LAND USE AND ZONING NORTH: Industrial .,,„•D „o.,...,.,,,_, MR - - - - u EAST: Industrial ”" MR SOUTH; Vacant /Undeveloped '.' ";a= i ' �." 11; MR WEST; vacant /Undeveloped - .,0NTAR10't_ MR GaILV1L PLAN RD DESIGNATION- Proposed Rancho Cucamonga General Plan is in planning stafe: Conditions described in'government Code 65302.5(b)(4)(H) Exist. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIE'ni ON DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD HAVE A EFFECT ON THE ENVIRQNMENT. City Water Sewer STAFF RE7CUZEM.TION :Approve,subject to attached conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting approval to create six (6) free standing industial buildings on individual lots. The project will be constructed of tilt -up concrete panels on concrete slab , foundations. The proposal is consistent with the existing County of San Bernardino General Plan. The General Plan designates the site as urban services. Urban services is defined as those activities necessary to provide and satisfy the specialty and internal service needs of both the urban and industrial areas. Uses common to those areas include warehousing, storage yards, ].umber yards, fleet maintenance yards, primary communication facilities and other similar industrial uses. industrial tracts are exempt from the provisions of City ordinance No. 18 establishing interim development review procedures for Sub- division applications. FINDINGS AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: Based upon submitted data and recommendation of other County Agencies, staff recommends that the Commission make the follow- ing findings: PROPOSED FINDINGS: 1. The proposed project will be consistent with the adopted City Community General plans, both textual and mapped., 2. Adequate service capacity exists, has been reserved, or will be available at such time as the project is .completed ; or within a reasonable acceptable time frame for fire protection, drainage and circulation. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of density and development. 4.. The design of the subdivision and the proposed iruprove- ment are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish and wildlife and their habitat. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of proposed improve- ment are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildfire con - flagration. 6. The proposed subdivision; its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the conditions imposed by the County Subdivision chapter, the regulations of the County Zoning chapter and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law. RECOMMENDATION: Based.upon the above listed findings, Staff would make the following recommendations: 1. That a Negative Declaration be adopted and that the Secretary be instructed to-file a Notice of Determination. 2. That the City Council APPROVE Minor Subdivision W78- 0245 -1, subject to the attached conditions. t: LAND DIVISIOTI APPLICATION SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING DE j n, , . — .g f� ' 3iL.3' I I I Fr- 1 Z.?a fo 154y, aw ul CQ m . ills, ... ..._ APPLICANT: Name Michael Todd Phone 21Z /FSq -7960 Address -? OS4 S. RQbertson, Los Aneelea. Ca. LEGAL 04(NER OF RECD�p #202 40035 Michael Todd Phone Same Address S,p i 0 E O 2.IG9� Ss+•pT, PGinnmc 6epaNntnt ' , col 1m1 it 11 I I 1 O I tz I, - �n I . - I F. NI'I1(N Fr I$' ►.'L'IR*4 Map Scale I "=.a:a` L.U. N0. _ VQ-7E - Q245- I _ ZLNE M2 ROAD MAP BOOK PAGE NO. FEE, RECEIPT NO.ZLI �9L 4ICOX0 hies 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Is 16 17 I8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 •, 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 i'. 50 51 52 Minor Subdivision W78- 0245 -I Page 2 of 5 STANDARD R1XYJIuE2a2nS; 1• The water system and fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with requirements of the State Health and safety code, and in accordance with plans approved by the San Nernardino County.Department of Environmental Health Services and the governing fire protection authority. 2• Easements and improvements shall be provided and drainage coordinated in accordance with the 'standards and requirements of the County of San Bernardino and the County Planning Ccnadssion. 3- 47here a bond is to be posted in lieu of installation of the improvement: A• The domestic water plan and/or sewer plan shall be rev ^awed by a civil engineer, registered in the State of California and said engineer shall determine the amount of bond ne,.-assary to install the improvements. 1Xhis amount plus ten percent aball be posted with the County of San Bernardino. B• The presently required certificates on water maps for the water company and engineer must still be ),laced on the map. In addition, a statement shall be transmitted to the Public Health Department signed by the Registered civil engineer for the water purveyor stating that the amount of bond recommended is adequate to cover the cost of installation of the improvement. C• Further, prior to release of the bond for the improvement, the engineer for the subdivider or the utility of jurisdiction shall sitmit a signed statement confirming that the improvement has been installed according to the approved plans and meets the requirements of all appropriate State and county laws pertaining to such improvement. it is the developer's responsibility that such signed statement is filed with the County Deparbnent of Envirormental Health Services. . D. In cases where the water agency or sewering agency is a governmental subdivision, prior to final recording of the tract map, the governmental agency shall submit a statement directed to the County stating that the improvement has been installed according to the approved plans or stating that the bored in the amount of 110 percent of the cost of installation of the improvement has been placed with the agency. 40 A catmitnlent rhall be obtained, in writing, &ran the sewering agency. Said commitment to indicate that the agency has the capacity to furnish said sewer service to the subject project, and that all necessary arrangements have been made with said agency to supply such services. A copy of the comlibrent to be filed with the Planning Department. r 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1! 12 13 14 I5 16 17 18 19 20. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 4S 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 5S 56 Minor Subdivision W78- 0245 -I Page 3 of 5 *STI�Er, GRADING AND DRAnUUM REWIRF24MA5: , County Transportation Departrmnt- 5. Paving, curbs and gutters shall be installed on Ninth Street and offer of dedication street. Plans for all improvements must be approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Engineer prior to installation Of said irlprovments. A cash deposit or bond may be placed with the City Transportation Department to fulfill this requirement. 6• Thirty -three (33) foot offer of dedication required along Ninth Street. 7- Sixty (60) foot offer of dedication required aloe offer of dedication street. 8 Twenty (20) foot radius of return offer of dedication required for rooming the corner on Ninth Street. . 9• One (1) foot non - access strip is required at terminus of offer of dedication street as shown on plat map. County y Flood Control District: 10. A structural block wall shall be provided along Ninth Street and the west boundary of the site. The wall shall extend around the curb returns at the access street off Ninth Street. 11. A masonry wall shall be provided along the east boundary of the site. 12- The access street off Ninth Street shall have a 2 -foot minimum roll or shall be designed to prevent overflow from entering the site. 13. The'portion of the lots adjacent to the access street shall be elevated 2 -feet above the top of the curb of the access street to reduce the possibility of overflow entering the lots. 14. Adequate provision shall be 0 for handling onsite drainage and dewatering the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream property. County Surveyor: 15. Upon completion of all oilier conditions, a Parcel Map of the pro- posed di- -ision shall be recorded with the County Recorder pursuant to provisions of the State Map Act. (Note: This map must be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil eMineer.) An advance copy of the Parcel `lap may be submitted to the County Surveyor to 'expedite checking, but the County Surveyor will not accept the linen for presentation to the County Retarder for filing until notified by the Planning Director that your Minor Subdivision application is in order for final approval. J.6- The Parcel Nap is required due to insufficient survey data -ecorded with the County of San Bernardino. Minor Subdivision W 78- •0245 -1 A • i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ' it 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 M J2 .. 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 S1 52 53 ' 54 'f 55 56 4t _ u. Page 4 of 5 *In addition to the Street and Drainage requirements, other "on -site" or "off - site" improvements may be required which cannot be determine from tentative plans and would ham . to be determined after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to the County Transportation Department. County Fire Warden: 17. Fire flow will be determined by this department upon receipt of the following information: A. Twm (2) sets of plans, B. Type of roof covering, C. Number of stories. 18. Calculations indicating that the fire flow requirement will be fret shaU be submitted to this department prior to plan approval. 19- Water mains and appurtenances shill be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District. 20. This departent shall be notified to witness an acceptance test of the water system prior to construction of any building(s) or stLuctures (s) . 21- Fire hydrants shall be installed prior to commencing construction of any buildings) or structure(s), and shall be approved wet barrel type only. 22. All streets and cul -de -sacs shall meet the mininumi San Berardino County Transportation Department standards. 23- Streets leading to cul-de -sacs or dead ends shall nor exceed 600 feet in length. In the event these streets are redesigned in any manner, the 600 foot length shall be maintained on all re- submitted plans (tentative or final). County Planning Department- 24. Street lighting shall be provided throughout the tract includirg all peripheral streets. 25. Utility lines shall be placed underground in accordance with the requirements of County Ordinance No. 2041. 26 • Existing zoning is MR. 27• prior to recordation of the final tract map, all required walls and landscaping shall be completed or suitable bonds posted for their. canpletion. Bonds shall be posted with the Planning Department. . i 2 3 4 5 6 7 A 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 '17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 . 41 42 . 43 44 '45 46 47 48 49 r',50 r 51' n? 52. 53 56 Minor Subdivision W78- 0245 -1 Page 5 of 5 28. Four '(4) copies of a final Grading and Iandscaping Plan shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits when phasing, where finished perimeter slopes are proposed adjacent to existing demlcpient, or whets graded slopes exceed five (5) feet in vertical height. 29. Graded slopes shall be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical height- of 30 feet. .Setbacks from top and bottom of, slopes shall be a minimum of one-half the slope height. Graded slopes shall be contour- graded to blend with existing natural contours and developed with -a minimuv radius at inGersectirz horizontal planes of two (2) feet, (measured one (1) foot from the top or toe of slope) and a maximum horizontal length of two hundred (200) feet. The surface of all cut slopes more than five (5) feet in height and fill slopes.nore than three (3) feet in height shall be protected against damage by erosion by planting with grass or ground mover plants. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height.shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten (10) feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed ten (10) feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exerted twenty (20) feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable fax the soil and climatic conditions of the site. Trees 102 15 gal.; .40% 5 gal.; 50% 1 gal. Shrubs 202 5 gal.; 808 1 gal. Ground cover 1008 coverage. Three (3) copies of a Landscaping Plan reflecting the above *eq+:icements and placement of street trees (if required) shall be submitted for planning Director Fevi.ew and approval. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be tiae responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership or until the maintenance is officially assumed by a County Service Area. All irrigation systems where required shall be designed on an individual lot basis unless conronly maintained in an approved manner. , Prior to recordation of the parcel map, four (4) copies of a Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, a let.er from the serving water and sewer agency shall bye submitted testifying that capacity for Minor Sub' division W18- 0245 -I has been reeiro s®d for a minims. period of one (1) year. Ir ZONING CODE - Dedication /Stred Impra.ement Requirements 61.0219(i) 1 's•rtrun Imc. and astcrnlh .riltnn line% in -.aid desert area. a forte 140) foot hall width from %ecuun tines and quarter section lines and a thirty 001 foot :c half width from sixteenth section lines .hall he required, and in the mountain area as defined in Section (11.02204k). a twenty 120) foot half width front centerline %hall he required. (_) Wifen building permit% are issued for multiple residential. commercial. administrative. professional. industrial and public uses, in a suburban area as herein defined. and the construction of the structure or improvement for which the building permit is issued would result in increase or change of vehicular traffic such that the construction of ..Irect improvements as herein defined is necessary for the purposes of protecting adequately public safety and health as a result of said increase or change in vehicular traffic, or surface drainage. the installation of said street improvements may be required to the extent necessary to achieve said purposes and in accordance with the current Adopted County Standards. "Street improvements" include any or all of curb and gutter, sidewalks. concrete driveway approaches. drainage structures. paving. back filling and preparation of the road surface to rough grade for the placement of paving ( and other necessary improvements as determined by the County Engineer. zi M r improvements. In the latter event, the actual installation of street improvements may be delayed until written demand therefor is made by the County. If surety bonds are submitted, they shall be furnished by a surety company authorized to write such bonds in the State of California. (4) Requests for minor deviation from street improvements and dedication requirements or deviation from required bonds. deposits or other forms of surety, may be made as provided in Section 61.0219(1). Such renuests shall-be submitted_by-the Countv Planning Dire for to the County right - o - way a hcation or street improvements on the grounds that same are not justified under Sections 61.0219(1)(1) and 61.0219(i)(2) thereof may be made in the aforesaid manner. teao�el 399 61.021961 LAND USE APIA BUILDING. REGULATIONS l 151 Appeal to the BOJrd of Supenison: See Section (11.0222. (h) Before, all uicupallev permit %hall be issllcd for any will - builkliniz or slructurc. the D. partnl•_nt u[ Btlildinf Mid Safety shall determine the following: i A) That all of the required dedications have been provided. I B) fhat edl of the required street improvements have either been installed or that a cash deposit. surety hand or other [firm of acceptable surety ill alt amount equal tO the estitllatcd cost of 'lie street improvements has ,cell posted With file Coulity llighWay Department to _ assure life installation uf•said street inlprove file fit%. (7) '*Suburban Area" as referred to in Section 61.021111i1121 above. shall be defined as those areas as designated on certain Official Suburban Area Maps which shall be adopted by the following procedure: (A) Before recommending the adoption of any such Official Suburban Area Map to the Board of Supervisors. the County Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing. Notice. of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by publication pursuant to Sections 655Q0 through 65504 inclusive of the Government Code at least ten (10) calendar Jays before the hearing and by such other means as the Commission deems nec- ssury. (B) A copy of the Official Suburban Area Map recommended pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the Board of Supervisors and shall he accompanied by a report of findings, summary of hearing and recommendations of the County Planning Commission. = (C) Upon receipt of a copy of any proposed Official Suburban Area Map and accompanying report. summary and recommendations from the County Planning Commission, the Board of Supervisors may- by ordinance or resolution. adopt the Official Suburban Area Map. Before adopting said proposed Official Suburban Area Map, the Board of Supervisors shall hold at least one public hearing. Notice of time and place of hearing shall be published pursuant to Sections 65500 through • 65504 inclusive of the Government Code at least ten (10) calendar day- before the hearing. (D) The Board of Supervisors shall not make a change in any _ proposed Official Suburban Area Map recommended by the County Planning * " Commission until the proposed change has been referred to the County . Planning Commission for a report and a copy of the report has been filed r - with the Board of Supervisors. (E) Upon adoption by the Board of Supervisors, any Official Suburban Area Map shall be filed in the Office of the County Planning Department. (8) Where any uncertainty exists as to the boundaries of such �.. .. '° :�- • - "Suburban Areas" the rules as set forth in Section 61.013(d) shall apply. r 400 LOVING col* • llodificatinn% Minor I)i:%i3 %ns 61.02111111 11111 Where the %ircct or treeirty 1, indicated on Ilse Master Ilan of I i_hw;ns, the street e[Iaek shall he evenly Live 1_51 legit uleasuted front the future neht - of - sat line. II% *l Where [Ile r1.0%%ay is ;[ road easeutettt. the nunrtnunt +[reel •elba:k •11;111 he Rlrnty lit• 1.51 feet IneasurCd from the recof:uilval vawf tent 111le. 1 \'1 Prmision %hall be made for streel purpoxs oft section and quarwr scelion line.: thereon the street setllack .hall he sixty - live Ieet measured from sueh section or qumler • ection lines: similar provision shall he made ITN street purposes on one - mx1venlll 1 111161 section line.. thereon the street setback shall he lifty • tive 155) 1'eet measured Pruitt such one - sixteenth t lilt)) section lines. ID) Street setbacks greater or lesser than thox required by the above sections may he required and established by the adoption of Precise plans pursuant to toe provisions of aecuon 0500 through 05504 inclusive of the Government Code. Upon adoption, by the Board of Supervisors. any official precise street setback plan shall be tiled in the oflwe of the County Planning Department. 1EI Street setback lilies. as delineated on all subdivision% and record oC survey maps recorded in said County after March 1. 1949. shall lie the street setback 4istances required on the property within the said subdivisions or records of survey. I F) Where future right - of - way lines have been established by Adopted Precise Plans the street setback line shall be as indicated thereon. (1) MODIFICATIONS INVOLVING 'MINOR DEVIATIONS — PLANNING DIRECTOR. (1) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, when in the public interest, the County Planning Director may without notice or public hearing approve, conditionally approve, deny or refer to the County Planning Commission Subcommittee, requests to modify the following requirements of this section. (A) Street improvements and dedications as required under Section 61.0219(1). (B) Parking and loading space requirements and improvements as set forth in Section 61.0219(b). (C) Street setback requirements. (D) Yard requirements. (E) Area requirements excluding lot :area requirements. (P) Height requirements. (2) Procedure: Written applications for such modifications shall be filed in the public office of the County Planning Department upon forms provided by the County for this purpose. Notwithstanding any other Provisions of this section, a uniform fee, as established by the Board of Supervisors, shall be paid to the County upon the Fling of each application 403 16MI761 n1,u'_I911nI L 151) CSF AND IWILDI`C. HEGUL MOMS " for Ilnldllwatlon. I-or the purpose ill Joratim-, a \penes% ulcitient.11 to Illf I�n)ceedimr. -. file County 1'Lnlnin;_ Director shall cause w he made, such im"esngatiov of I:lct+ bearlm_ on the application As will provide necessary infornt:uion to jsssure Thal the action on each such Application is cotlsistent ttiih the intent and purpose of this section. No application shall be regard: d as having been tiled until the lee stated above shall have been paid n) the County Planning Department. _ (m) MOD111CAT1ONS INVOLVING MINOR MAIArlONS Oh RESIDENTIAL USES BUILDING AND SAFIi'rl -. f I) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section. when in the public interest. the ('ounty Building and Safety Director may without notice or public hearing, approve. conditionally approve. deny or refer to the County Planning Director. consistent with procedures 'in Section 61.0219(1)(2). requests to modify the following requirements of this section. except any project which was inquired to have a public hearing before the ` Planning Commission or Planning Commission Subcommittee and except requests involving two (2) or more parcels. (A) Street setback requirements. (B) Yard requirements. (C) Area requirements excluding lot area requirements. (D) Height requirements. (E) Residential parking requirements. (2) Procedure: The Building and Sat'ety Director may approve a request for minor deviation concurrent with a building permit and shall file a notification of said action with the County Planning Director. (3) For approving such modifications, the County Building and Safety Director, pursuant to Section 61.0219(m), or the County Planning — - Director, pursuant to Section 61.0219(1). shall designate such lawful conditions as will secure substantial protection for the public health, safety. and general welfare, and shall find as follows: y (A) That such modifications will not be inconsistent with the intent and purpose of this section and /or any Adopted blaster Plan or Precise Plan. (B) Th. t strict compliance with the provisions of the section would create an unnecessary hardship or unreasonable situation on the - particular property, due to unusual or extreme topography, unusual shape of the property, or the prevalence of similar conditions in the immediate vicinity of the property. (C) That such modification will not be materially .-w detrimental to the abutting property or the permitted ttce thereof. nizenal 404 /`�eti�"cvn I We the undersigned h0meouxteA4 aite .ltwV4 in oPPo -lition oif the ne- goncng of the "south aide o� /gth atAeet oppwximate4 1,500 �eet eawt o1 /%nmoaa, Rancho Cucamongai Pont,ion o� the N64' o� .iec'fion 35, .7 - 1-N, R -74, SBM. Name Addae u 6 778 CZi h -W Awe-` /N 4/ , "J 1v /00 �Voi{lErT�i y�I �.an7A Petition We the undeAAiped homeounerra aAe at.1wrigly in oppoaition o� the n,e- 3.0ning o� .the reauM aide 04 Myth atneef appnoximateLy 1,500 feet eaaf o� &AWAa., Rancho Cucamonga, po.at•ian o� the NE � o4 erection 35, -7- 1-N, R -7-W, S68M. FAIR C i/ J NNW i4ddaeaa CO I ok I ` / Y A Cpl �✓- -sl_, Z r 0 n &70'r � � 1 I 10333 ' � n 7 .�: Y+ t,. 5 :' 'N f RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting June 28, 1978 7:00 p.m. 9161,Bxseline 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Dahl Garcia Tolsto Jones Rempel `y —' 3. Approval of Minutes 4. Miscellaneous Reports ' ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 1. Proposal: Location and development plan review to re- store and use an abandoned school building' as a private school, Index No.: iv96 -89 Location: West side of Archibald, approx 281 feet south of 8th Street Applicant: Barbara Sayler ENVIRONMENTAL ITEMS 1. Proposal: Environmental review for the development 6f a recreational vehicle center. Index No.: W92 -80 Location: Located on the northwest corner of Hellman Ave. and Foothill Blvd. Applicant: Robert Packer NON- HEARING ITEMS 1. Presentation and review of Alternative 4 of the proposed Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Presentation to be made by John Blayney. Adjournment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA El REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 24, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met in a regular session on Wednesday, May 24, 1978 in the Community Service Building. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rempel at 7:05 p.m. who lead with the pledge of allegiance. Commissioners Present: Herman Rempel, Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Peter Tolstoy Commissioner Absent: La>>ra Jones Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, . it was voted to approve the minutes of the May 10, 1978 Planning Commission Meeting. City Manager Lauren Wasserman announced that Mr. Jack Lam has been appointed as the new Community Development Director for the city. Mr. Lam, who is presently the Community Development Director for the City of Lompoc, was introduced and will be on board with the city mid -June. PUBLIC HEARING: LOCATION f, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONVERT A RESIDENCE INTO A RESTAURANT (INDEX W88 -81) S!W CORNER OF FOOTHILL 4 VINEYARD (Gilbert Rodriquez) Doug Payne presented the staff report stating that the applicant is proposing to convert an existing two story residence into a restaurant and is proposing to develop the site with additional commercial buildings. On September 6, 1977, the Board of Super- visors approved the zone change to C -2 -T. The "T" standard of the zone requires special consideration with regards to flood hazards, setbacks and landscaping. The site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. $ Vineyard Avenue with access on both arterials. It is approximately 200 ft. west of the Cucamonga Creek Channel which is scheduled to be improved by by 1980 and 1981 through a Federal project. In its present state, however, the Flood Control District states that it would be difficult to adequately protect the site from flood hazards as the site is subject to infrequent flood hazards by reasons of overflow, erosion and debris deposition. The Cucamonga County Water District has indicated that the site has both water and sewer service available for connection. Based E upon their findings and analyses, the planning staff recommends that the project be denied until such time that the Cucamonga Channel is permanently improved. The Chairman declared the hearing open. Mr. Wasserman stated that he has met with the applicant who has k,• indicated his intention of developing just the restaurant at this time. Mr. Gilbert Rodriquez, applicant, spoke in favor of the project. He reviewed the flood hazard concerns and presented the site plan and design for the restaurant. } Mr. Dahl asked Mr. Rodriquez if he would consent to signing a document releasing the city from future flood hazard liability. °• The applicant. indicated he was agreeable to this. H� I h Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1978 Mr' Rempel stated that perhaps a wall could be constructed on the west side of the property and on Foothill Blvd. The applicant pointed out that there is another property owner between the Cucamonga Creek and his property. Mr. Garcia suggested that ,it would be more desirable to have landscaping on Foothill Blvd. rather than parking. The applicant stated that they would be willing to design a wall and mounds into the front landscaping to help mitigate the flood hazard concerns. Mr. Bert Francis, the adjacent property owner, spoke in favor of the project stating that he would like to see a good restaurant in the area. Mr. Stan Antecloser from the Alta Loma Chamber of Commerce and Mr. Joe Di Ori ospoke in favor of the project. There being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Rempel and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve. the location and development plan to convert .a residence into a restaurant (Index W8R -81) subject to staff findings $ the following conditions: (1) Recommended staff conditions. 92 through #12. (2) That the plans for landscapin3 improvements on Foothill Blvd. as well as the identification signs be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. (3) That an agreement be prepared by the City Attorney and signed by the applicant releasing the city from any flood hazard liability. PUBLIC HEARING: CHANGE OF ZO E FROM R -1 -T ( #398) TO C -1 (INDEX W87 -73), S/E CORNER OF BASELINE RD. F, CARNELIAN AVENUE (Ontario Savings F, Loan) Planning Staff member Doug Payne reported that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from.R -1 -T to C -1. The 10 acre site is located at the southeast corner of Baseline and Carnelian. The Environmental Review Board determined that the project would have a non - significant affect on the environment with the excep- tion that a qualified archaelogical observer be required to be �. present when soil disturbance exceeds 5' in depth. Staff feels that the zone change would increase the amount of commercial property at this intersection from 25 to 35 acres and would be competing with adjacent shopping centers, for the 7,000+ persons that are lr,cated within the service area. Based on their findings, staff recommends that the zone change request be continued until after the adoption of the General Plan. The Chairman e..eclared the hearing open. Mr. Bob Mills of Associated Engineers spoke on behalf of the applicant Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. He read a letter from Mr. ?'- Harry C. Crowell which stated that the owners are desirous of — developinga savings and loan bank, professional offices and a restaurant on the site. They are not proposing an additional commercial shopping center such as the adjacent properties. Mr. Mijce Kelber, Ontario Savings $ Loan, stated that they have made extensive market surveys which indicate a need for-this use. Mr. Kelber clarified that Ontario Savings & Loan has sold the property to the applicant, Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. r r Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1978 Mr. Tolstoy stated his concern for the need of a buffering , for the residential properties s/o the site. Discussion was held on the possibility of having A/P (Administrative / Professional) ' zoning on the south portion of the site with C -1 to the north. However, it was stressed that there needs to be continuity in the development of the project. Mr. Stan Antecloser stated that he felt the Commission should have a plan before them before they decide on the zone change. He asked what is being proposed for this site under the General Plan * The City Manager stated that the consultant has proposed three different alternatives for this site, and that staff's recommendation to continue this matter until the adoption of the General Plan might be appropriate. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Garcia .d unanimously ca ed it was voted to continued the request for a zone change to August 9, 1978, after the adoption of the city's General Plan. The Chairman called for a short recess at 9:10 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 p.m. The City Manager requested that two additional items be added to the agenda at this time. PRELIMINARY REVIEW FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT REPORT, PROPOSED PRIVATE SCHOOL SITE, 8968 ARCHIBALD AVENUE (Barbara P. Salyer) The City Manager reported that the applicant is seeking .. ehabi- litate the existing elementary school site at 8968 Archibald Avenue. It is proposed that the building be used to accommodate a private school to include a Day Care Center and serving grades K -8. The applicant proposes to open the school in September, 1978. Mr. Wasserman stated that the Development Review Committee has recommended that a focus Environmental Impact Report be prepared to study the traffic concerns from Archibald Avenue as well as the noise level in the area from the R -M (Restricted Manufacturing) zone uses in the surrounding area. Also, a report'wi�l be required from a structural engineer. Mr. Stevens stated that the Commission should set a public hearing date to review the location and development plans for the project. In order to expedite the project, the Commission may consider and approve the project in the R -M zone rather than proceeding through the zone change process. Mr. Stan Antecloser, Alta Loma Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the project and stated that this would certainly help alleviate some of the school problems. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the Development Review Committee's recommendation that a focus Environmental Impact Report and a structural report be prepared for the project. City and planning staff were instructed to expedite same and set a date for publ' -c hearing. MINOR DEVIATION, E/S OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, W/O WH ITTRAM (INDEX NW129 -86), (Se condo Colombero) The City Manager reportei that the applicant has requested that street improvements on Etiwand a Avenue for this development be completed at a latter date since the adjacent areas are undeveloped. - 3 - Non- conformin and Historical Si ns -The City Manager reported t at consi eration needs to ma a tvi th regards to historical signs within the community, such as the Sycamore Inn and Thomas Vineyard signs. Mr. Garcia suggested that perhaps the Chambers of Commerce would be willing to ;Hake a survey of the historical and cultural signs within the community. With regards to subdii-ision signs, the Commissioners recommended that the city might require a deposit and set a.ti.me limit for these signs. In addition, Mr. Garcia stated that it might .be good to advise sales agents that they are responsible for placement and removal of their signs. Mr. Wasserman stated that staff recommends that roof signs be prohibited unless there were no other alternative for placement of the sign in which case, the roof sign would be reviewed through the conditional use permit procedures. Mr. Garcia stated that roof signs should be a composite part of the building and that 'a maximum size should be set for the sign. Mr. Wasserman stated that the City Attorney would review recent cases regarding election signs and would prepare the appropriate recommendation based on same. Mr. Garcia stated that a provision for temporary signs should be incorporated into the sign ordinance (e.g., Grand Openings, etc.). Mr. Tolstoy stated that the use of window signs needs to be reviewed. The permanent use of window signs is a problem in the community. Also, the maintenance of the signs should be spelled out in the ordinance. 4 - jo 0 Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1978 4 City staff has been working with the applicant who has agreed to make a cash deposit in lieu of proceeding with the street improvements.` It has recently been discovered that the County has waived this requirement and therefore, the city is appealing their decision and is requesting that a public hearing be set before the Planning Commission. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Garcia and unanimously car ed, it: was voted set a public hearing for June 14, 1978 . to hear the appeal for a minor deviation, Index AW129 -86. POLICY ITEM: bTTM93i3 —ON PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE The City Manager reported that it would be helpful for staff to obtain additional input from the Commission regarding various aspects of the Sign Ordinance. Billboard Si nos Staff recommends that a maximum 5 year period a li s ea-to e estto amortize the billboard signs within the city as well as non - conforming signs. The Commissioners stated that -the amortization should be based upon the value of the sign. Mr. Fred Guido from Pacific Outdoor Advertising spoke on behalf of the outdoor advertising companies and requested the Planning Commission to declare a mortorium on the section of the sign ordinance dealing with billboards until a decision has been reached on the San Di6go Case now before the State Supreme Court. Mr. Tolstoy stated he believed that the comments made at the last meeting indicated that ::he Commission did not wish to have billboards in Rancho Cucamonga. ACTION: Up on.rr.otion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously car ed, it: was voted to instruct staff and the city attorney to prepare an amortization plan to discontinue billboard signs within the city over a maximum 5 year period based upon the value of the sign. Non- conformin and Historical Si ns -The City Manager reported t at consi eration needs to ma a tvi th regards to historical signs within the community, such as the Sycamore Inn and Thomas Vineyard signs. Mr. Garcia suggested that perhaps the Chambers of Commerce would be willing to ;Hake a survey of the historical and cultural signs within the community. With regards to subdii-ision signs, the Commissioners recommended that the city might require a deposit and set a.ti.me limit for these signs. In addition, Mr. Garcia stated that it might .be good to advise sales agents that they are responsible for placement and removal of their signs. Mr. Wasserman stated that staff recommends that roof signs be prohibited unless there were no other alternative for placement of the sign in which case, the roof sign would be reviewed through the conditional use permit procedures. Mr. Garcia stated that roof signs should be a composite part of the building and that 'a maximum size should be set for the sign. Mr. Wasserman stated that the City Attorney would review recent cases regarding election signs and would prepare the appropriate recommendation based on same. Mr. Garcia stated that a provision for temporary signs should be incorporated into the sign ordinance (e.g., Grand Openings, etc.). Mr. Tolstoy stated that the use of window signs needs to be reviewed. The permanent use of window signs is a problem in the community. Also, the maintenance of the signs should be spelled out in the ordinance. 4 - �' s r .�sn t• .v . r. Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1978 CONSENT ITEMS: The City Manager reported that the Development Review Committee had reviewed the projects listed under the consent items to determine whether an Environmental Impact Report would be required. " The Commission requested that Items 04, #G and #7 be pulled off and heard separately. #1 - INDUSTRIAL PARK, 9181 9th Street, Cucamonga MR Zone (Restricted Manufacturing) (Michael Todd) Recommendation: That an Environmental Impact Report is not required and that a negative declaration be filed. #2 INDUSTRIAL F, COMMERCIAL DIVISION OF LAND, e/s of Haven at Jersey Avenue, Cucamonga, .M -2 (Crowell /Leventhall, Inc.) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed. #3 ZONE CHANGE, e/s of Archibald, 150' n/o Devon, Cucamonga From R -1 to C -2 (conversion of residence) (F. E. Shelley) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed. #5 - ZONE CHANGE, sw corner of Arrow & Archibald, from A -1 to M -R (Harry S. Rinl;er) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed. ACTION: Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously, carried, it was voted to approve the Development Review Committee's recommendations for consent items #1, #2, 83 and #5. CONSENT ITEMS: 4 - ZONE CH ANGE FROM A -1 to C -1, 10323 19th Street, Conversion of residente to restaurant (L. R. Parks) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed. Mr. Wasserman reported that the Development Review Committee felt that there were some significant site and development concerns but did not feel that an Environmental Impact Report was required and that a negative declaration should be filed. Staff indicated that the residence was on a septic tank at the present time and that it could easily hook up to the sewer with a proposed develop- ment nearby. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Tolstoy and carried by tX_e following vote: AYES - Garcia, Tolstoy, Rempel; NOES - Dahl; ABSENT. - Jones, it was voted to instruct staff to provide additional information on this project for further review by the Planning Commission. #G - ZONE CHANGE FROM A -1 to C -2, s/w intersection of Foothill Blvd. at I -15, construction of Building Supply Center (William F. Longley) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed and that comments be received from the County Flood Control District on the project. The City Manager reported that the Development Review Committee has recommended that a negative declaration by filed on the proposed project. Concern was raised regarding the heavy traffic from trucks to the supply center. Staff stated that Foothill Blvd. is a major arterial and should be able to sustain the traffic. ACTION: Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously Fair ed, it was voted to file a negative declaration on the project. . r; _ 5 _ r ° r,a : t.p „ 37+x% . —., ,•� Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1973 s: CONSENT ITEMS: TT MNGR FROM R -1 -14 to R- 1- 20,000, n/s of Almond Avenue, 200' w/o Sapphire (J. Gregory Lawlor, Enterprises) 6 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10210 RECOMMENDATION: That a negative declaration be filed on the project. In addition, the project will be reviewed by the Planning Commission due to hillside concerns and the County Flood Control District will be requested to comment on the project. Hr. William Morehouse of the Toups Corporation, San Diego, spoke in favor of the project.and gave a presentation (,n the proposed development. He stated that when the project plans were submitted, the County Planning Department advised them that they could not submit an Fnvironmental Impact Report with the plans. He .3tated that they have been working with the County Transporation Dapt. and the National Forest Service in regards to the circulation and the national forest to the north. Mr. Morehouse described the slopeanalysir prepared for the project and pointed out the open space adjacent to the Cucamonga Wash and highly sloped areas. Chief Billings stated that the Fire District has been reviewing the plans with the Forest Service. Mr. Garcia stated that the Commission has concerns with the project because of its size (160 acres), the Edison lines running through the property, the national forest to the north and the hillside terrain. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously Farr ed, it was voted to continue the Environmental Impact Report review and Tentative Tract No. 10.210 to June 10, 1978 in order to receive additional information on the site analyses studies and correspondence with Forestry Service from the applicant. COMISSION DISCUSSION: Mr. Dahl expressed his ccncerns regarding the processing of commercial developments and requested that the city �- aff refer all commercial developments to the Planning Commissi� for review. In addition, he requested that the city attorney prepare Gn ordinance specifying that all service stations be reviewed by the Planning Commission under the conditional use permit process. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Garcia and unanimously c..rried, it was voted to instruct city staff to refer all commercial developments to the Planning Commission for review and to instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance specifying that all service stations be reviewed by the Planning Commission under the conditional use permit process. ADJOURNMENT: Upon motion by Tolstoy' seconded by Garcis and unanimously carried,, it was voted to adjourn to'the joint meeting with the City Council on Wednesday, May 31, 1978 at 7:00 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 11:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �7�Lft.+L uza ta, nterim ecretary rd 6 - �K }F _ i r lfit RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING Regular Meeting June 14, 1978 I. Piedge of Allegivnce 2. Roll call: Dahl_, Garcia , Jones —, Rempel_, Tolstoy_. 3. Approval of Minutes 4. Miscellaneous Repo -.za ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 1. Proposal: Zone change from A -1 -5 to C -1, Index No. W103 -12. Location: South side of 19th St., approx 1500 feet East of Hermosa Applicant: Louis Parks Staff: Doug Payne NON- ADVERTISED ITEMS 1. Proposal: Appeal of Director action Location: E/s Etiwanda Avenue, approx 300 feet north of Whittram Applicant: $econdo Colombero Staff: /Lauren Wasserman 2. Proposal: Appeal of Planning Director action regarding Minor Subdivision Index No. 78 -0025: 4 lots Location: Southwest corner of Victoria and East Avenue Applicant: Alfredo C. Murillo Staff: John Perevuznik 3. Proposal: Minor Subdivision to create an industrial tract of 15 lots, Index No. W78- 0230 -I Location: Northwest corner of Haven Ave. and Jersey Blvd. Applicant: Crowell /Leventhal /Associated Engineer Staff: John Perevuznik 4. Proposal: Location: t / 1� Applicant: �"1 Staff: 5. Added item: Minor Subdivision to create an industrial tract of 6 lots, Index No. W78- 0245 -I South side of 9th Street, approx 200 feet west of Hellman Michael Todd John Perevuznik /D.C.D. Group Director Review Index No. W97 -93 6. Preliminary report from Flood Control District re. Tentative Tract 10210 . (West of Sapphire St., North of Almond Avenue). The Planning Commission had requested the County Flood Control District regarding potential flood r control problems in the area of the proposed development. Also, planning constraint studies on same tract 10210. / L- /?o 'D e / unz� 0 I IN wr C +T rr5 , r.7t s, Planning Commission Agenda -2•- June 14, 1978 7. Preliminary Environmental Report - Proposed private school site, 8968 Archibald. Prior to determining whether an environmental impact report shall he required, the Planning Commission requested that a special report be prepared concerning the compatibility of the proposed development with the adjacent industrial zoning. In addition, the report submitted deals with noise, structural safety, and the overall value of the project to the City. POLICY ITEMS 1. An ordinance to supplement the Subdivision Map Act. 2. Discussion of Proposed Sign Ordinance.