The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980/04/09 - Agenda PacketI I.,I�II1 � 1i1 1 1- 11 '. 1_ � li 1. I � I f II Lii 1 1 it f. , � 1 I Lf' Hi. ', �� 1 r � 1. 1 1 1. I 1 1 1 �;,: 1, 1 I � 1 .�� 1, .1 '� 11 .II :1, �I r 1 1. 1 i„ �,I�, 1 '�1 y x.11 11 , � 1,, � �� 1.�1 , iMl 1 ';� ��I 1� 1• 1II y.1111. 1' � � li 1 I I I � 1 1 I Y I 1 1 n;1 �. .1 I I } I� r 111 �(:: :.ip J: 1 it 1 X11, i1j1 dill 1 rl. 1''f.ui .�'f. � � ' � i.. '1(r l �' '1�'. 1 � 1 I. I. '�il� �'.I� �� .11 1V � y.; �:e I" � 1 I,' 11 1 U 'I��1 ,n. II J1. }1� r 11 (l �. i.. •11 �:1 `'��1 � ��'1:1�1',1 e. 1.11'�� X111 i i1'll 11 1', 1 �I� �,� ,�I 4 111 11� • l ly l �I�i'��1', li 1��' 1 /� � � 1 fll ; i�F 1 r. 1 '1 '' i'tl !f �I 1.�1. J'11 , I I '. 1 I1. `�1�1 ,�,1 ;j1 ' � �1 1 ' ' 1 � i. �` 1, . I1 1 I I �I � 1111 1111 i1 1.1.1 j1 1�'i I �', I',` ;�1 �11 III �1 1,1.E 'iI "15 � �. �1 I 1 �1 �, . ' �,1 1 4�,',h 1, �� , 1.11 1 '�,, 1: +, r l'' � :1:,;1 :1'�1 �,;1, I �t. ,,,' ,� i , b\; ;' 1 ' 11 1 1 I J I Y�i1� 1� , 1 1 � i ,�,, ,;: (11 �1 1 1 I 1 1 � ,1� +! � �., I'� r� h'.1 � 1. II � � `�11 1 I ;, � 1 �'. 1'.. �,1 1 � I � r��. ,fl�,t T�1 }✓,�1f 1�i1� I t I 1 �� 1 � 1�� 1 I li 1 1 �� , � I �'1 1 1'h /, '1'. 'I 111 } 11. • �'1 �. ��,jl �il�'1� �1 1{ il'j �. l'' I ; l� 11r1r 1 1 � �'V1 �11 ,l ll��I 1, � '�11: ' ' '. '1 1 {1♦ . 1,, ,111,, r� p i�1 �1 �' 11 ��i '': 1 � ..l i { 1, t w � ,;�: �' t 1 r4 I � 11. ', "; «I +, � ,. 1 � e ,.. 1 I�r, n;1 �. •1 r 111 �(:: :.ip J: 1 t' dill .�'f. . yea � i.. '1(r l �' ;.1. �'.I� �� .11 1V � y.; �:e :� ; �.I: ' 1''ti �. i.. `'��1 � ��'1:1�1',1 r CITY OF RANCHO CUGIMONGA PLAN14ING COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, April 9. 19800 7100 p.m. Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Lina, Rancho Cucamonga, California I. Pledge of A.11eginnco ACTION I1. Roll Call Commiouionor Dahl X'' Commissioner Ranpol _ Commissioner Curcio " X_ Commissioner Tolstoy� Cumminaionor Jones R' Iii. Approval of Minutes Approved 5 -0 March 12, 1980 March 17, 1980 March 26, 1.980 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar Approved 5 -0 A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR REVIEW 140. 80 -09 - L.V. 110FGAARDEN - The development of an industrial Euilding to be ocated at 9851 8th Street. Approved 5 -0 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OP DIRECTOR REVIL•4 NO. 80 -10 - HOWARD RUCKS - The development of an industrial park to e located on the south side of 9th Street, went of Hellman. VI. Public Hearings )ASSESSMENT Approved 5 -0 C. SITE APPROVAL NO. 80 -02 AND ENVIRONMENTAL - JOSEY BARRAN - The development of an auto dism=ntling ynrd to be located at 13195 Whittram Avenue, Recommended Approval D. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -04 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - to C. C. 5 -0 ACACIA CONSTRUCTION - A change of zone from A -1 to R -3 or more restrictive zoning for property located on the southwest corner of Baker and Foothill. Recommended Approval to C.C. 5 -0 E. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -05 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - JUDITH AND THOMAS STEPHENSON - A change of zone from R -1 -1 to R- 1- 20,000 or n »re restrictive zoning for property located on the northwest corner of Klusman- and Whirlaway. riapnilipC mmisnion Agenda April 9, 1980 Page 2 Recouamended Approval P. ZONE ORANGE NO. 80 -06 AND RNVIRPhffPNTPZ ASSFSSML +NT to C. C. 5 -0 DELI. MCDANIEL, INC. - A change of cone from A -1 to R -.l or morn restrictive zoning for property located on the northeast corner of Itnmona and Church. {I� V:I. Old Buninown VIII„ Now Business the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission adjburned at 9;13 p,m,p to an Adjourned Planning Commission Meeting (Irvine trip, Saturday, April 12, 1980, 8:00 aim,). Approved 3 -2 G. TENTATIVE. TRACT MAP NO. 11428 - DATA DESIGN - To 4; Tolutoy, Garcia op- create 14 industrial Iota for property located on posed dud to flood the north side of Foothill, between 11aven and control condition Center. 1, Approved 5 -0 IL TENTATIVR TRACT MAP NO. 11415 - CITY OF RANCIIO CUCA- MONGA - Reversion to acreage of Tracts 9399 and 9400 .located on the north side of Banyan, west of Beryl. IX. Council Referral X. Director'o R ^ports Approved to allow in -•I. RE UAST BY SIGMA SHARE FOUNDATION for locating opera- - .M -I; zonn with site tion in the industrial area. approval 4 -1. Tolstoy k, opponed because he XI. Public Cooment - Anyone wishing to comment on any item )� .felt it is not si- not listed on the Agenda may do no at this time. milar to other uses, XII. Upcoming Agenda i' 1. Director Review No. 80 -16 - Meyer Investment 2. Grading Ordinance 4. C XIII. Adjournment - The Planning Commission has adopted Adminis- trative Regulations that act an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. if items go beyond that time, it shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission adjburned at 9;13 p,m,p to an Adjourned Planning Commission Meeting (Irvine trip, Saturday, April 12, 1980, 8:00 aim,). - -- -1 :? 4c:k'� CITY OF 1KNCH0 CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AG ENVA „ Wednesday, April 9, 19800 7sOO p.m. Lions Pnrk Community Cantor 9161 Dnso Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California I. Pledge of Allegiance 11. Roll Call Comminsionor Dahl "' Commissioner Raspol Commissioner Garcia " ' " ' Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Jones III. Approval of Minutes March 12, 1980 -- March 17, 1980 P' March 26, 1980 me IV. Announcemes Consent Calendar A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 80 -09 - L.V. HOFGAARDL•'N - The development of an industrial building to bo located at 9851 8th Street. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR REVIEW 110. 80 -10 - HOWARD DUCKS - The development of an industrial park to be located an the south side of 9th Strent, west of Hellman. VI. P blic Heari.ngo ASITE APPROVAL NO. 80 -02 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT �- C JOSEY DARKAN - The development of an auto dismantling yard to be located at 13195 Whittram Avenue. ` \v D. ZONE CHANGE NO, 80 -04 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - Yp ACACIA CONSTRUCTION - A change of zone from A -1 to R -3 or more restrictive zoning for property located on the southwest corner of Bake: -and Foothill. E. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -05 AND ENVIROMdENTAL ASSESSMENT JUDITH AND TUOMAS STEPHENSON - A change of zone from R -1 -1 to R- 1- 20,000 or more restrictive zoning for property located on the northwest corner of Klusman y. and Whirlaway. tlF ' t Planning Cosenission Agenda April 9, 1980 Pago 2! F. AMLCHANCE N0, 00 -06 AND 1+NVIRONMEtgAI, ASSESSMENT - Piith MCUANIEL, INC. A change of aona from A -1 to ` R -1 oil more rustri.ctive zoning for property located on the northeast cotti:er of Romano and Church. VII. Old Businens VII/I�. Now Business n _1! G. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, .11420 - DATA DESIGN - To aI/ I�� croato 14 industrial lots for property located on the north aide of Foothill, between Haven and Conter. 11. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11415 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCA_ MONGA - Reversion to acreage of Tracts 9399 and 9400 located on the north aide of Banyan, west of Beryl. IX. Council Referral X. Director's Reports / � l I. REgUEST ISY SIGMA 91108 FOUNDATIGN for .locating opera- / _ tion in the industrial area. XI. Public Comment - Anyone wishing to comment on any item not listed on the Agenda may do so at thim time. XII. Upcoming Agenda 1. Director Review No. 80 -16 - Meyer Investment 2. Grading Ordinance XIII. Adjournment - Tile Planning Commission has adopted Adminis- trative Regulations that act an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, it shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. !J 0 0 WN , -Y . IN AHUMID 2A1 VWAVM113 JAV 11 1 11 u Irl 4 I F 1 1. m L#.,u U, 11 1 1. m ® CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CCMMIS810N MRETING March 12, 1980 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORD U1 The regular meeting of the Planning Comninnion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Bane Lina, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, March 12, 1980. ' Meeting wan called to order at 7:00 p.m, by Chairman Hempel who led the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Peter Tolatoy, and Harman Hempel ABSENTS COMMISSIONERS: None ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Ted Ilopson, City Attorney; Barry IIogan, Senior Planner; Michael Vairin, Associate Planner; Tim Beedle, Associate Planner; John Martin, Civil Engineer CONSENT CALENDAR Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, the following Consent Calendar items were approved as submitted: Environmental Assessment of Parcel Map No. 5767 - Fink Environmental Assessment of Parcel Map No. 5130 - Cohen Environmental Assessment of Parcel Map No. 5922 - Newton Environmental Assessment of Parcel Map No. 5893 - Barton Environmental Assessment of Director Review No. 80 -07 - Kalbach r, s: PUBLIC HEARING zone from R -3 to C -2 for property located on the nort and East Avenue. ACS - A change of corner of Base Line ® Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report in detail. It was reported that the request for the zone change is being done in conjunction with two other items on the Agenda; namely Director Review No. 80 -05 and Deviation No. 80 -02. Minor Separate actions are required for each of the items even ,i 4 Ul.l) BU� StNEJE; itEQBPST ivy HENRY REI'TER for time use of flog" for an induntrinl leasing officu tL� located on tl�n suuthwant corner of Arrow and Archibald. applicant had Jack Luma, Director of thisyiCnm unCilnhn caneprovide additional information requa"tnd loutp on the i"0un. Datils There being no discussion by time Commission, it was moved by Comm�isreview of seconded by Commissioner Jones.and unnnimously carried to continua review of the applicant time to provide additional information on this this item to allow issue. * A A A k NL'w BHSINPSS DIRPCTOR REVIEW NO_RO -05 AND ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT -JOAN IS'MCS - Develop- meat TO a Service StaCion Canter Proposed on ttmn norttmwnat corner of Bass Linn and East Avenues. Division. It was reported that ammy approval of thin Michael Vairia Associate Planner, reviewed time Staff Report in approval which is on file in time Planning i development eould be conditioned upon ptionofltile associated minor deviation- change by t Chairman Rompel asked for questions from tt:e Commission to staff, Commissioner Tolstoy q questioned the amount of building nrnn and arrangement of buildings on time site. Ile felt that the arrangement of buildings could be done ' in n better and more efficient way to provide u more aesthetic and reasonable looking site. He stated that he realizes this use is one hicheTwould be compatible a` for the site; however, he felt the site could be design Barry Ilognn, Senior Planner, resporded by stating that several design concepts have been developed for the aite and that this appeared to be the most efficient way of designing the site. The unusual shape and configuration of time site pro- eents major problems in design. Commissioner Garcia Co A motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by sue a Negative the approve Director Review No outlineddio the Resolution,Dnclaration booed upon AYES: DAHL, JONES, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: TOLSTOT ABSENT: NONE Commissioner Tolatoy stated that he voted "no" for the project because he could not agree with the way the buildings were arranged on the site. ® -3- March 12, 1980 planning Commission Minutes w, <' -- ---- ^— �I 0 0 though they fill occur on the name project site. It wan further reported that the request is consistent with ti:e General Plan and that the uses ported t for ti:e site are permitted by the 'Zoning Ordinance. Chairman Rem pel naked for questions from ti:e Commission to Staff. There bai.ng mane, Chairmen Rempel opened the public hearing. Jim Danko spoke in opposition to the proposed zone change. The opposition was based upun the fnct that the project site is located within 6001 of the property that Mr. Banks owns on Victoria. Mr. Danko felt that th:e proposed zone change would be spot zoning and not appropriate and that it would adversely affect ilia Property. 6 The Commission responded to Mr. Banks by stating tl:nt the project site is bounded by the freeway off ramp and mayor atreeta and that no other. typo of zoning would be feasible . thin area. In addition, the request in conni.ntcut with the adopted General Plan. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rompel closed the Public hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to recommend adoption of Zone Change No. 80 -01 to the City Council. AYES: DA11L, TOLSTOY, JONES, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * * * * * aiuN unOINANCE - Development of --n Condominium Conversion Ordinance. cunuv cONVer Barry Mogan, Senior Planner, reported that the City Attorney had submitt d com- e mento on the draft ordinance and that further revision and review of comments are needed prior to review and discussion with tine and Commission. It was recommended that the item be continued to March 26, 1980, for further review and revision in accordance with the City Attorney'u comments. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the public, the public hearing was closed. Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unani- mously carried by the Commission, it was moved to continue the public hearing for ti:e Condominium Conversion Ordinance to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of March 26, 1980. Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 12, 1980 0 C A M A A MINOR 1) L•VIA't'ION NO. 00 -02 - JOHN ISAACS - Deviation of not -back requirements for a proposed Service Station Center on the northwest corner of Dane Lino and Eaut Avenue. Michael Jnirin, Associate Planner, reviewed the Staff Report in detail. Ile stated and reported that the unuounl configurntlon, size and ahnpo of the nito prenanto a difficult design problem and that strict interpretation and enforcement of the not -buck requirements for freeway right -of -way would cause undue hardship on the applicant. Chairman Rempol naked for quentiono from the Commission to Staff. There being none, a notion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Tolotoy to approve Minor Deviation No. 00 -02. AYES: DAIIL, JONES, GARCIA, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE A # * e A TIME EXTENSION OF DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -05 - JERRY LANTING - A request for a ono year time extension for the 138 unit apartment complex located on Archibald Avenue, south of 19th Street... 0 Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, presented the Staff Report it. �I� detail. Ile reported that on a previous action by the Commission on a similar case a six month time extension was granted. Therefore, based on previous Commission action, it was recommended that a six month: time extension be granted for thin project. There being no discussion by the Comoission, it was moved, seconded and unanimously carried to grant a nix month time extension to Director Review No. 79 -05. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS REPORT repardinR hillside Development Standards Tim 8eedle, Associate Planner, presented a Staff Report in detail. He reported the development of hillside standards for the north portion of the City is needed for proper hillside development. The Planning Commission agreed that there is a need for strict 1:171sidu develop- ment standards and directed Stafr to prepare such standards for their review and consideration. Planning Commission Minutes -4- March 12, 1980 A. , Jack 1.0m, Director of Community Dnvnlopment, distributed a schedule of General Plan hearing dates. In addition, Mr. Lam orally presented special meeting dates in addition to those that are listed on the schedule. Mr. Lain then reported that the e1 prepared Plan Civao upon. After a brief explanation and review of alternative plane by Mr. 7,11111, ti►e Commission dincuonod their views on the alternativen provided by the Consul - tant. commissioner Tolstoy stated that he did not like the encroachment of the office area into the presently designated industrial area south of Foothill Blvd. commissioner Jones shared the some feeling. Commissioner Tolatoy also had concerns with Alternative A -4 which he feels will increase tl►e overall popula- tion density. ilia concern for the increase is based upon a fact that the w ntedito deliberations on and not adoption nothave large tile of high Plan high density residential districts. commisoioner Dahl felt Clue the Alternative Plana prepared by the Consultant do not reflect the concepts of the Planned Communities. lie felt that the Alternative Plans should incorporate more of the open space and greenbelts as proposed by the planned communities. not contain Coissioer necessaryngreenbalty ►aconcepts thatte illagive continuitya e between the planned communities and the rest of the City. commissioner Garcia was concerned that the General Plan was not considering ti►e image of the City. Ile felt the approach to alternatives is in error as it appears the City is being built around a shopping center. Commissioner Rempel felt that both the Terra Vista and Victoria projects gave the City some overall concepts to consider. He stated that it is up to the Planning Commission to consider such things as greenbelt, office and regional locations and transit routes. ile also agreed that the office encroachment into the industrial area was not consistent with the original goals and policies developed by the Commission. commissioner Tolatoy felt that tl►e commercial area should be dispersed rather than concentrated in one single area. Planning Commission Minutes —5— March 12. 1980 Thera being no further discussion by the Commission, a motion wan made by Cou►niduion�r Dahl', seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unaniaaunly cntried to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of Mnreh 12, 1980. The meeting wan adjourned at 1005 p.m. IlantlectfulAy flubmittod, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development ICJ Ask "`: Planning Coumission Minutes -6- March 12, 1980 4. .0 I] r., f DATE: TO, FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report Aprl1 9, 1900 Planning Commission Ll Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Dan Coleman, Junior Planner NMENfAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO RDEN - The Dovo upment r1f a 15,000 square nu to be located at 9851 0th Street. tt7nni ustrial BACKGROUND: This review is for environmental assessment f0 determine any sf n(�Ffcont adverse imnac -t -a- on the onvircnmont as a result of this pro - jnct'. Stn and arcs tecturol design Is not considered unless Its related to environmental concerns. To determine significant adverse Impacts, an Initial Study of osnvironmantal coneorns'ls prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would Indicatn either no significant impacts or the potential for significant ad•terso impacts. If a determination of no significant impact is made, based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an environ- mental impact report should be required to fully analyze the potentlal impacts of the project. ENVIRONMENTAL SE ETING: The applicant is requesting tn construct a 15,000 square foot in ustrral building on .93 acres of land located adjacent to two existing Industrial buildings on the south side of 8th Street approximately 800 feet east of Archibald, following Is the adjacent land use and zoning of the site: LAND USE ZONING North Santa Fe Railroad Tracts R -1 South Vacant M -2 East Industrial M -2 West Single Family Residence R -i The subject property Is presently zoned M -2 aid designated minimum impact industry on the General Pion. The site is presently vacant and contains no significant vegetation. Full street improvements will be constructed by the applicant along 8th Street and the new Cottage Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL AN AYSIS: Part I of the Inital the applicant a n is attached for your review. has been completed by staff and no significant were found. Study has been completed by The environmental checklist adverse environmental impacts ITEM "A" Ilr 'r 1 .1' , • f 1'1 1 1 1 , t ' ,' 1 I I l 'f d 1� 1 i 11 , 11 :. 1 i 1' • I I 11 P I r l l 1 �' (� I 111 '1 � M l •1 :I. I I. 1� ,1' '' Ir I .) '. r. f •, , I ! ' 1 r 11 V I4/ 1 1 1 t 1 , . � 11 1 11 11 1 111 r' ''I I'' � 11.,•.1'•, 11' ,vi' ..,.; 1, II''; r, 1`(,�, 1i 1 �'�. 1 1 1 -�i ;� 1 lulu 11 1 11': !! ,1'. 111 •, 11' 1 '',' 1' I 1' I 1 1 1 ,r�'\I 1'I' 1 i,111 , • 1 lF 1 1 1 V 1.1 �, 1 •1'I l:�l,. .I�r '..• r. 1 Y � r• II I t I . . ,.• I ,11 . '. r 1� ' I . '' I I ... M � I 1� �" • � 1 : , 1 '11, �f. I •I 'I � .I a 1f 1 .1 :1! l 1, ' 1 1 1, I r Staff Report 1900 1. •1 I' Page .Y1 - tile Pro act wTII If the Commission concursp than tile Istluance of a Negative Declaration for • 1 adverse 1 1. ' upon the environment. tile ProJect would be in order. 11.r 1 w.' '� 1'•''• ■ ■■ ( !� JACK LAM, J DI :actor of community Development JL.IDCikds Attachments: Exhibit "All Site Plan Part I Initial Study rY�1 1 ,1,t�• 1 • 1''1 rltl• J 1 ,r • . 1 J , ' , r .4. •' , 1. , l�� li i�l �• 1 , "1 I• ' i '1 i r w r 1 U 1 I r �1 '� r. .' • �'r II . 1 I 1 , r; (' 1 : LI c �I 1 • r:�1 Y. ' ) 1 t " 1 1 •. • I 1 r ` t l 1 1 li •' 1 11 , 1 � Y ,1 c A LI] i 0 0 N 1 -� �� • i� l�df � � I . 1� t '? �tll I � Y: w Z tF•� `.` IY U-1 rN 1 14 Z7 11 9 X Y � 11 ( -, �,�l!,3,1.. = I ��•-- • - - - - -+ ,I �;) a � ►1 Viii° '� " ti. ? �10lt��tl -�! � I! •i q 9 � '� ' � � �`` 3 t iw..w• 11� �1�9 Pei 1 CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAHONGA INITIAL STUDY a PAWL' I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - Tu be completed by applicant Environmental Asses3ment• Review Foot $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Develormant Review Committee through the department whore the project application is mado. Upon recci.pt of,this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development RevLew Committee will meet and take action no later than ton (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be hoard. The Committee will make one of three dotorminntions: 1) The project will have no onvironmental impact: and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an dnvironmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the nppli.cant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 1 Xr� NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: � E LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)' LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE: AND FEDERAL AGEN IES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: .P - A® • Y� r • I II PROJECT DESCRIPTION :I DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS / 2C ' 7co j2 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND 'PROPOSED DUILDINGS, IF ANY: S, % ' AcRr' C DESCRIBE THE'INVIRONAIENPAL SETT7.NG OF THE PROJECT SITE t INCLUDING INFORMTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEE:S): li _ J�A— ;- 1sLEF,,2C_4 11L!?_E� F��i/ r�Q•�L-��_' _f i/ cT' Cf/iI)-iSN n r_- 7—/71r- s • i i'. N .1 15.. •il ri 11 l ' �)1 l.. I 1 J r•l� �; , �fi l•1'' 1 L J•�I e '\ a 1 •1 I , l 1 � I � ll M1 l; • 1'a.' Y�:.� It'1 III • r 41 It :__I, ;. Y! I x > I • Ill I 11 /1 (' 1 \a l I�• y 1 y ! I • �)1 l.. I 1 J r•l� �; , �fi l•1'' 1 L J•�I e '\ a 1 •1 I , l 1 � I � ll M1 11� l; I ! .i �1.�61 �•1. ,� I � '1,1 •u ! �ifa t' I I .. �I ! I • 11� 1 C I . V WILL III I7r PROMICT: J/ 1. create n n1lbstanUt►1 change in ground contours? ✓� 2. create a substantial chango in oxioting noise or vibration? Imo•" 3, create n substantial change in demand for r municipal services (police, fire, water, sowngo, ate.)! create changes in tho existing zoning or general plan designations ?, v 5: Remove any existing troas?.,How many? _ Create the need for use. or disposal of potentially hazardous materials ouch as toxic substances, fiammables or explosives? Explanation of any YBS answers abovot IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. 0 CLRTIrICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, staLements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate ovaulation can be made by the Dev,Aorment Review Committee. Date .Z /,k4 / &V signature Title Y� 0 LJ ,T, DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Roper April 9, 1900 Planning Commission 0 Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Dan Coleman, Junior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 80 -10 - HUC The )oveTopmont of an InaustrIal Park t Located on the South Side of 9th Street, Approximately 1000 fact Cast of Vineyard. BACKGROUND: This review Is for environmental assessment to determine any s`— i nlf'i -cant adverse _Impacts on the environment as a result of this pro- ject. S to and arc: toctural dosign Is not considered uninss It's rotated to environmental concerns. To determine significant adverse Impacts, an Initial Study of environmental concerns is prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would Indicate either no significant Impacts or the potential for significant adverse impacts, if a determination of no sig- nificant Impact is made, based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be Issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an environmental impact report should be required to fully analyze the potential impacts of the project. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The applicant is proposing to construct an industrial park In two phases on 1.65 acres and 1.86 acres, respectively. Phase I Is proposed to contain three buildings totaling 28,231 square foot and Phase II Is proposed to contain four buildings totaling 30,496 square feet. Following is the adjacent land use and zoning of the site: '.AND USE ZONING North Vacant M-R South R.R. spur, Vacant M -R East Industrial Building M -R Nest Industrial Building M -R The subject property is presently zoned M -R and designated minimum impact industry on the General Plan. The site is presently vacant and contains no sigrificant vegetation. Street Improvements already exist on 90 Street, and applicant will be required to construct the new Flowsr Road with full street Improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant an is attached for your review. The environmental checklist has been completed by staff and no significant adverse environ- mental impacts were found. ITEM "II" 9 Staff Report April 9, 1900 Page 2 RECOMMENDATIONt Based upon analysis of the Initial Study, It appears that tto pro act will not cause significant advorso Impacts upon tite onvironmont. If the Commission concurs, than the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the project would be In order. Respectfully out Ittod,r UIJ�.�u 0 tA,..,._._._. -. JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JUDC:kds Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Plan Part I Initial Study L.J ,� ••M •N w ww Y• ••MY tIMU . M•IIY q pl w� ftt *q I '. 'bNl 'ObtlYV � tl1bY11N V MMM1Y • 16rW1 �w.: w. �ii.+ w�' �. �" ��: r" �i. �' i°' i. w' �' wY' ��i�i .•.%•+w$.�.i�ii.i..��i.'�'w w:.'•a.•"•i� •S:�rr�iu.`.L�i- FTwi+'.LL�.TLTi s i I I lilt till aI —mow-- 0 I L yt: V' W � aS f OL�d i•• CITY OF RANCHO CUCA140II0A INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INYORMA'i'ION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environnontal Ansesnmont Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring onvironmontnl review, this form must be completed and nubmittod to the Davelopmont Roviow Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Envi•ronmantal Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Roviow Committee will moot and t•aico action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project in to be hoard. The Committeo will make one of three doterminations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be Filed, 2) The project will have an do Aronmontal impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. 0 :• .. SON 12% VIE-Mu rz - is FFM APPLICAtTT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEP11ON4: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPIiONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: 15 gAMc I LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL. AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Y -i L'-j .A �2O�7LC'1' M'16CRIV'CION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS N ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND'SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DUILDINGS, IF'ANY1 DESCR:CDE THE-ENVIRONMENTAL SrTTT.NG OI' THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANT'S I (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) i 'THE -Xll�l Y� w1� �1ax►�wY -y -[�'� "Et^� c.�,�•tirtl EL — A.17 �XI�TW[.� 'f'T2F�� .�►�^ �Gliz'1 YJt t �Ts��. . In the project, part of a larger project, one of a series' of cumulative action, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? hI 1. n 3:^ 1 ' 0 n Explanation of-any YrS answers abova: IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. n CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furniuhad abava and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability. and that the facL•n, ntaL•cments, ttnd information presanti_ are true and correct to the best of my Scnowledge and belief. I further understand t additional information may ba required to be mitted before an adequate evaulation can be made b io .1opn,ent Review Committee. Date V �/ 'XJQ Si atur y� Ti lo 41 `' ` I -13 �ar•,�,x. Tnrrr Pi:nsrcn_� �� )LI NO 1. Create a nubuL•antinl'•chungo in ground contours? ✓ 2, Create a substantial change in existing _ noise or vibration! ✓ 3. Create a substantial change in domand for _ municipal services (police, firs, water, sewage, otc.)l 4. create changes in the existing zoning or .__ general plan docignntions2, _ ✓ 5: 11amovo any existing trees?, Iiow many? ✓ G. Create the need for uso,or disposal of _ potentially harardoun materials such an toxic substances, flammablen or explosives? Explanation of-any YrS answers abova: IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. n CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furniuhad abava and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability. and that the facL•n, ntaL•cments, ttnd information presanti_ are true and correct to the best of my Scnowledge and belief. I further understand t additional information may ba required to be mitted before an adequate evaulation can be made b io .1opn,ent Review Committee. Date V �/ 'XJQ Si atur y� Ti lo 41 `' ` I -13 0 n L:' J a• Y Y l� El DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECTS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report Apri1.9, 1900 Planning Commission Jack Lem, Ulrector of Community Development Michael Valrin, Associate Planner AS ARK N -A Rcqunsr the Development or ty to be Located at 13195 Whit•tram Avenue SMtlll - an Auto Dismantling - M -2 Zone. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval for the development of an auto dismantling yard on approximately two acres of land to be located at 13195 Whittrom Avenue (Exhibit "A "), Whlttram Avenue is tradl Lionel ly the street where auto dismantling facilities have been located. The pro- ject site is presently bounded on the east and wast by existing auto dis- mantling facilities. South of the project site Iles an existing railroad line and further south Iles heavy industrial uses such as steel mills and Kaiser Steel farther south. The property is zoned M -20 (General Manufac- turing) and General Plan for Major Industry. The project site is presently bounded by a six foot chain link fence on the oast, west and south boundaries and an eight foot high block wall approximately thirty feet from the front property line. in addition, the site presently contains two build;ngs; one which will be used as the guard house and the other as an office. l,he applicant proposes to construct an additional building approximately 3,200 squa -e feet which would be a covered shelter for the storage of electrical parts. ANALYSIS: Exhibit "B" displays the proposed development pion for the pro- ject. The entire area to the north of the existing block wall is propose,. to be landscaped and all business and storage activities arc proposed to take place behind the eight foot block wall. Access to the project site will provided by one measures twenty feet wide.axThe lZoning n e Ordinance block wall requires entrances of this nature to be a minimum of twenty -four feet wide. The refore, the block well wlII have to be al tared to conform with this pro- vision. One single access road leading to the rear of the property will be located to the center of the site and a hammerhead area will be provided at the rear of the site for emergency vehicle turn around. The proposal indicates an adequate asphalted parking area and the access road will be compacted slag. A compaction test will be required to certify that the necessary compaction is provided for emergency vehicle use. VIci- bility of the stored vehicles will be significantly mitigated by the requirement that car bodies not be stacked higher than two high and no storage will occur within the first 150 fee of the project site. ixtrl "C" .'aff Report 119, 1900 Pago 2 ExhIbl. 'C" Indicates the elevation of the proposed covered shelter and views from Whittram Avenue. As can be seen from the elevations, much of the activity will be screened by the eight foot high wall and with land - scaping adjacent to the wall the project site wall be much better looking than the existing auto dismantling yards presently surrounding the pro- ject site. Part I of the Initial Study Staff has completed Part II cant odvr Impacts on the after rov f the Initial Asseasment W be adequate. be in order. Is attached for your review and consideration. of thu Initial Study and has found no signlfi- envlronment as a rusult of this project. If. Study, the Commission finds the Environmental then issuance of a Negative Declaration would CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Ilearing was published in the Daily Report legal ad section on March 28, 1900. In addition, o Notice of Public Hearing was sent to all property owners within 300 foot of the subject property. To date, no correspondence has bcc.n received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: If, after review of the information presented herein an'a tar tRa conclusion of public hearing, the Gc'wisslon concurs with the above proposal and analysis, thou a resolution of approval and standard conditions are attached for your review and consideration. Res ctfully S hmittod, JACK LAM. Director of Community Development, JL:MV :kds Attachments: Exhibit "All Location map Exhibit "D" Site Plan Exhibit "CII Elevations Part I - Initial Study Resolution c' r t; 1, 1 I ',''� _i� 1 • 1 r 1 1.� r 1 I 1 � f� r. n'I 'r ^ 1 1rr !11 r .1 1• 1 h. 1, � 1 1 � 1 • r d r rl" ,li 1 1 � .r'' i� I ✓'� 1 ,1 e 1 I. I • �'� /.. -1� !f, 1' u 1 1 � 1 � ` �• f 1'.�1 II 1 .r1 1 1 6. � �l � r, ,i.', 111 �' 11 rll 1 A {r11: ri ��r rr �'�� t r 1 � r� !t I ✓ 1. rl•fi ,r1 ��,i �'1 , i � r I q ru F 1 111 �'�Ilr 1 I ,!I X11 1 ' • ''r � � i % 1 11 APP .I r VICINITY L7 yli it i I. t' 1 � ' ` Site t � 1 1 r I: ill I Approval 80 1 I 1 1j 1 " 1 11. t I u ti 1r /Z 11 1 1 • V 1 / Lo f' • �I .1 n1i'.rI nh�'� ,I 1'U Ll L'., Ll,t; 11 I t 1. r f t l '.1 ' t � ■r� 1 •. 1 I I �` 5, r ' L,�� 1 ; t q , -•. '•'!. 'gin I • 1.', 1 r 1 t :'� t� ' � .�: 1 1 1 r I if .A , :1 1� I• �' 11 4Nr n, 1 1 1 �Av� 1 I I 11,1 i r I 1 'I 1'�; A 1 •1 1 1,1'. `1 .! , I r,. 1.11 I. f' t~ I.I I �'• 1,' 1 '�1 I 1'Itl �1 1' i11, 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,r. 1 tr1 1I 1 1 i,ll ,• •`. \ :1 �' 1 i 11 1 I I 1 , 1 1. � 1 I r . 11 1 „a I( 11 r 1 1 f.. 1 1 .1J6 � 1 11• , I 1 �1 1 1 I 1 '" 111 { 1 � : :�� 1A � 1� 1 ' 1 1 'I �1.:• 1 � ! 111 � I 11. 1 1 . r: I 1 � .I. 11 ,� II 41111 1 '1'1 1 1�•II � 11, � 1 '�) •1 '1 1 •�. 1 �,i ,1 1 1 I 1 11 1,�• 1 +� � M 1• X11, I 7 , 1' I Ili I �1 J Ir 1 ,1 1 11 . 1 •.1 ,� iN;A 1 11 I• T� 1, �� 1 7T y♦ J 1 1 1 1 1, I'� 1 I r' 1•I 1 Ir 11 1 _( I• 1 II' 1 ry I r'. 1 1 1 II.i I 1't t l+ M 1 •'. � L, IA I.• •,1! I, l rl I 1 II N1. ��1 1 U LI (. �1 t � o ^• :r /'„ J , 1 {�. 1 ,1 1 �,:,I \ ' ��1 ",1 I '1 �' ( r' ��• 1 1 1 I Y v - r', 1 � i:• I ( . „ I li 1 l i ` r'.1 •e 1 v �'I 1 .Z l r l 1 • � ♦A 'II 1 •�� r • 1 '� • 5 I .r 'Y ' ��l \. !i 1I 5_I•• 1 1 . l 1 1' 11. 1 1 1 1 � l y•• .1 �. • � • ,'t 1 ;.�.� ( '\ / f„ I is v ♦' sii �. l n I, jl u CITY OF RANCHO CUCA110110A INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SIIVET - To be completed by applicant Environmontal Assoosmont Review Foos Q70.00 For all projoctu requiring environmental review, this form must be comploLad and nubmiLtod to the Uovelopmonr Review Committee through Lbe deparL•ment where the project application is made. Upon receipt of.this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Devulepmont Review Committoe will moat and Lake notion no later than ton (10) dayo before the public meeting at Vaich time the project is to be heard. Tho Committee will ma)ta one of t:hron determinations: 1) The project will have no onv.ironmentnl impact and a Nagative Docluration will be filed, 2) The project will have an dnvirorunontal impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning tllo proposed project. PROJECT TITLES Site Approval APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Josv Barkan 13195 Whittram Ave. Rancho Cucamonga NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: - Same LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 13195 Whittram Ave. Rancho Cucamonga LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATR AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCIi PERMITS: 1 -1 k; VWw t I W(- .J .CC 11 N is ell N� is .. i a ''�''`� �� • � viii tea s •b i i 0 wal r as Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant onvironmental impact? No. 1 PROJMT D ,SC PUTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJL••CTI Automobile wrocking and dismantling. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY2 Two acres f.with (2) two at ;unturos to remain. Ono guard house 670 S.F. ,gxiu•ina and one off, 290 S.Lr. DESCRIBE TILE , '.N� VIROWIENPAL SMTING OF THE PROJECT SITL INCLUDING INFO"MTION ON TOPOGRAPHY-0 PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)t The property slopoa to the southwest and is.sparcaly vegetated. There are two existing s rue uroo, one houser to be used ad a ® guara rosicloRce 'onu a 0111gle room suructuro to LTIIiSl'I-2ia -Wr offieu T nimai-e. To the west and oast are two (2) axistin wreakin arch one o which a contiguous w e su so proper y. Caro e in consistency in la:'�d use in the local area n that there are, wal r as Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant onvironmental impact? No. (0 I'M —.11MI-11-110-17MIL ISF3 �Q. x 1. crnaLe a substantial a chap in contourn7 g ground Z• create a substantial change in existing noise or vibrations 3. Create a substantial change in domr.nd for municipal sarvices (police, fire, water, oowago, etc.)? x A. crnnto changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5: Remove any existing trees? x G How many? Create the need for use or disposal of Potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammablos or explosives? >;xplanation of any YrS answorn +abovet IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, next page. complete the form on the CERTIrICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the beat of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and informnt•ion presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and bolie£. I further understand that additional information may ho required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made b_ y��pevoloprient Review Committee. i Date_ 2R -('7,r) Signature I�9 Title :P-01(�1�SFf7 V A i, HFUOLUTION NO. 00 -1.4 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION GRANTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF TRACT NO. 11415 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE+ OF BANYAN STREL "f WEST OF BERYL STREET WHEREAS, rill the 5th day of Mnrrh, 1980, the City Council ordered the Reveralon to Acronge of Tract Non. 9399 and 9400= and WRER1;A8, the tentative map of Tract No. 11415 is submitted herewith for Tentative approval by said Commiosion, being in compliance with snid order, and, the California State Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. Tito tentative nap is substantially correct in form and content pursuant to said Council order. 2. Tl:e lots as shown on the tentative mnp conform to ® current toning standards. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 9, 1.980. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9T11 DAY OF APRIL, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Herman Rempel, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of thr Planning Commission held on the 9th lay of April, 1980, by tl:e following vote, to wit: AYES: COmMISSI0NERS: NOES: COtelISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSION2RS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: 1 i.,y�1 NN��ry lciGNr / {N.f Vr LOCATION: N ` 7 - CI % LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE MAP NO. i DATE FILED: "� -1 NUMBER OF LOTS:_„ RECEIPT NUMBER: f.: FEE: -.,.. e"" ZONE: (- Z D BY: L, II 11 I 90(9GROSS ACREAGE: S' TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED n U c -Sa , _ ADDRESS: 4 rrO w I� i MINIMUM LOT AREA: n uhf GU cu Mo�oe MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: w•w« *,t «�,► * *,t,t.t,k r * *rt•k * *,r « * *� *art *,t * * * *,w,►,► * *+r * * ** RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE N n LJ REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Decication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on ----Cornr P/L radius require on Other 3. h-igTts of vehicular access shall e m to as o ows: 4. Street vacation—required fore 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required or: 6. The following perimeter intersections require reaTionment as follows: RCE 20 ® 0 TENTATIVE MAP N0, Page 2 Improvements Install or Bond prior to 0 Recording for ❑ Building permit for 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C, avemsnt, "'— sidewalk, on drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 0. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: STREET NAME CURB GUTTER PV14T. - WALK �iFT APPR. -STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS OTHER 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Enginoer. I. 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary seders, water, ® electric powere gas, telephone and cable television. All utilities are to be underground. 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamongo shall be marbelite underground installations. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The following Specific dimensions, .e. , cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: y 10. e o owing ex st ng s ree s are substandard an w require: Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. _ 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements i that may be received from them. RCE 20 11 CJ 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Datot April 9, 1900 Tel Manning Commission Prom: Jack Lam, Director of Community development Dyt Micheal Vairin, Associate Plinnor Subject: A RMURST FROM THE SIGMA S11ARC FOUNDATION for operation of an Alcohol and Drug Abuse Correctional Program in the M -R Zeno BACKGROUNDS Attached is a letter from Mr. Ronald Payne of the Sigma Share Foundation in which to lino requested that they be permitted to operatu tl:e foundation from an induotrial building located in the M -R zone. The building in one of the multi.- tenant buildings located within the Vanguard industrial park located on the northwest corner of 7th and Archibald. An the Commissionl will recall, a determination was made for another use in the same building rolative to an industrial medical clinic. The Commission determined that the medical clinic was industrially oriented and would therefore be compatible to the other Industrial uses in the zone. ilia Commission required the use to be approved through the Site Approval process by which a public hearing would be held before the Conmiosion. This Commission would have full authority for periodic review of the use in cane of problems that may arise an a result of the medical use. In addition, it is clearly stated that thin approval for the medical use did not constitute approval for other medical offices or administrative offices in the zone unless it was somehow found to be directly related to the industrial area. The intent and the purpose of the M -R (Restricted Manufacturing) zone is stated in the Zoning Ordinnnce to encourage the development of light industrial urea in areas where the developmental or expansion of residenti&l, agricultural and commercial uses are not compatible with other industrial uses. The M -R zone does not list administrative or social care facilities an a permitted use. There- fore, the applicant has requested a determination by the Planning Commission as to whether or not this use would be similar to the other uses listed within the M -R zone. ANALYSIS: From the description of the proposed it appears an though the foundation is primaril y tional classes being taught in the evening. Th e whether or not it is the intent of the M -R zone with industries upon the cents not be expands uses not directly in conjunction on the medical center, was based ® injuries and that such use would �v medicine. Y`(' use, as provided by the applicant, an administrative use with instruc- major issue to be discussed is to permit primarily administrative 1 uses. The Commissions' decision r being used strictly for industrial d into family practice or general ITEM "I" C 0 0 Unfortunately t1►e denign of thin particular building within the Vanguard induu- trinl center lands itself morn logically to thin kind of une rather than an industrial use. The buildings wara donigtiod no ntore front buildings providing' a window into tine project and it becomes difficult to obtain industrial tenants in a apace of that nature. Tito options before ttte Plnnning Commission are similar to that which were used for the medical center. Tito Commission could find that the Sigmn Share Foundation operation in related to the industrial community of the City end that its location hero would be more compatible than other arena of the City. The Site Approval procans could be required which would permit the Commisnion authority for future review and consideration if problems should orioo. :..0 other option available to the Commission would be to find that Clio line in not directly associated with the industrial area and that thin use would not be par -, milted at thin location. 'ilia Commisoion may nine want to consider the general location of the Vanguard canter in proximity to tine industrial and residential areas. The center is located on the northwest corner of 7th and Archibald which is bounded on the south by single family reoi.dentialt on the north by a private elementary school, on tt►e wont by vacant light industrial land, and on the east acrono Archibald 1181tt industrial land. As the Commission is aware. Archibald Avenue is one of our major north /south thoroughfares and is designated as a special boulevard. It ties been discussed many times as to what type of development should occur along Archibald within tl►e industrial area. Discussion two led to considera- tion of other uses along Archibald for aesthetic purposas and a logical transition for uses from Archibald back. RECONMM4DATIONt It is reco:mmonded that the Planning Commission consider all input provided at the meeting by Cite applicant and connidor the zoning ordinance requirements and make the determination an to whether or not the request is justified. If the Conomiaaion finds that the use is like and compatible to the industrial area than it is :aco►mnanded that such use be centrolled by Cite review and consideration of a Site Approval application. Reopectfully sypmitted, JACK LM, Director ofc Community Development JL:MV:nm Attachment: Lotter from applicant 0 71 71 ►J V b RANCHO CUCAM7 M PLANNING 001"ISSION 9320 BASE LINE HOW RANCHO cUC11NgN t CALIt�OMM 91730 Dear Sirs; SIGMA SHARE" i'oUNDATION P.O. hoot 1120 AurA LOMA, CA. 91701 Rot Use Variance Recently tlio SIGR1 SIW2E lburdation applied for a use permit prior to leasing a facility at 9024 Archibald Avenuo, Rancho Cucamonga. At first there neenxxl to be no problem in obtaining this porrnit, than, tiro planner handling this noticed that the site was one of those very small sections of the city zoned M-R. Ila stated that i.f it wore toned M -1, we would be allowed to establish our business there. 110 then indicated that he could not make a decision on M-R zoning and we would have to request a formal hearing before this comnisnion. Tho SIGN SHAIM tbundation is established to corm t the problems of alcohol and other drug abuse. our function at this facility will be primarily administrative, with class's in substance abuse and other facets of the program being conducted in the evenings. Sanb=a will be presented at this facility for the industrial cofpaniea of this area as well as in plant (factory, etc) presentations. Since alcohol and its subsequent abuse costs industry billions of dollars yearly,wo will be in an ideal location for providing thin service. one of our neighbors at thin facility will be a Medical clinic that deals with industry, not unlike our own situation. The location is ideal and centrally located. since I am a resident of this city, Thia location will be our main headquarters for the foundation, which we hope will be national in scope within a few years. We will be not only working with industry, but, with all branchs of County and soma of the different City governments as well. We will be working with the Criminal Justice systm providing a diversion program and providing services to the Probation departmentF and police in alcohol awareness and training. The foundation will provide a broad range of services, some of which will save the City and County money. Volunteers from our program provide a mininnnn of one hundred hours of service to their respective cammmi.ties per year. If additional information is desired, please call me at (714) 987 -5272. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. Yo s v ' t2A y Ronald G. Payne�K� for SIGMA SHARE 0 Ile, 0 ' . )O -NlO A RESOLUTION ] A" NINC COMMISSION A1'I'ROV1NO TRACT MAP NO/ 11420 LOCATED NORTH OF FOOT1ILL BETWEEN CENTER AND HAVEN k'IIEIIEAS. the City L'nginoor and the Development Advisory Board have reviewed and prepared conditions of approval for Tract Map No, 11428 purouant to City Ordinance No. 20. WHEIMAS. Tentative Tract Map No. 11428 is now brought forward for review and approval by the Planning Commission pursuant to City Ordinance No. 28. NOW9 7110 REFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING OOMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS SECTION Is Thnt the following findings have peen undo$ 1. That the site indicated by Cho subdivision is creating adequate sized lots for future. development. 2. That the internal etrnnts will adequately serve each parcel being created. SECTION 2s That thin project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 90 1980. SECTION 3s That Tentative Tract Map No. 11428 is heroby tentatively approved subject to the following conditions and the attached City Engineer's Reports 1. The internal atreota, although private, shall conform to City Standards. Street plans shall be prepared for approval by the City Engineer and a atvoet permit executed for inspection of installations. 2. Building bctback lines on internal streets stall be strictly adhered to. O 3. A 100' building setback line from the Flood Control right -of -way shall remain in force until permanen drainage facilities are installed In Door Creek. Each undeveloped parcel will conform to the City Standards applicable at the time of application for development. 4. A final map shall be recorded within 18 months of the date hereof or this approval Shull become null and void. 5. covananto, Conditiona and Runtrictionn granting access I rlghto and catablinhing :mintennnce of tho'privata atroote shall be npproved by the City Attorney and k recorded concurrently with the map. )' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIB 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 1900 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Oil RANCHO CUCAMONGA CPC DYt h Harman Rein all Chairman 0 ATTEST: Secretnry of the Planning Comaiesion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Coamiasion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wan duly and rogularl; introduced$ panned, and adopted by the Planning Comnianion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a rogular meeting of the PlanningCommin- sicn ho?d on the 9th day of April., 1900, by the following vote to wit: AYESt COMMISSIONERSt NOES: COM14ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS t `i,J -44 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT ' FILED BY: Lockwood Engineering Company Inc. LOCATION: East side of Center between Foothill 6 Church LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lot 4 of Tract No. 2202 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 11428 DATE FILED: 2/1/00 NUMBER OF LOTS: 14 RECEIPT NUMBER: 5909 FEE: $220.00 ZONE: M- R- 7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * M * * * * * TENTATIVE NAP PREPARED BY; Lockwood Engineering GROSS ACREAGE: 3307 ADDRESS: 380 W. Fonthill Blvd. MINIMUM LOT AREA: Rialto, CA. 92376 875 -5015 M1;4I11UM LOT FRONTAGE: 150' * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE N ® Data Design Lab, 7925 Center Avenue 987 -2511 Haven Investments Rancho Cucamonga, CA.91730 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Decication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other - 3. 1Tts of vehicular access shall e limited as follows: Non - access on Center 4. Street vacation required or: 5, master Plan of Streets revision required or: 6. The following perimeter intersections require rea gnment as follows: RCE 20 C TENTATIVC MAP N0. 71420 Pa go 2 Recording NX Interior Street Irnprovemrnts Install or Bond prior to >fF*Tai4"fi'c�iTCing•; Building parm ' . 116VL�fl X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. ravement, sidewalk, on drive approach per�ah, parkway treus and street lights on all interior streets. B. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: STREET PIAME - GUTTER PVhIT. WALK _DR APPR. TREES -STREET LIGiITS OTHER Haven X X X X X X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures 9A) AiMIMtrXX9PXXSdA9tXlt9lJR$kh(X as required by the City Engineer. _x 10. Prov ffe all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, 'gas, telephone 9: r); �(R'fNkilJAXtAkXYdf iA'X. All utilities are to be underground. X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing publifa utilities as necessary. _jam 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. �E_ 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans sholl meet approval of the City Engineer. X_ 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga s'mll be marbelite underground installations. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. e o lowing ssiec c dimensions, .e., cul-de-sac radius, s re e section widths) are not approved: Knuckle nit standard /street widths rPdtirn to rAr R -O -W 10. T}►e o ow of g exMt ng s ree s are suGstandard ana will require: Approvals and Fees X 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from QR1BC1i'AVI San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 I TENTATIVE MAP 110.. 11420 ® Page 3 r X 21. Permits from ot:lar agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans, for: B. City: - C. County us o enren r r c : U. U.I.S.-Trenching Permit If any trenches arc over ''`deep: `— E. Cucamonga County Water District: -- ---- -X- F. Other: Flood Control Map Control -_ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to bn substandard in either frcntape, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map:_ , A 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius a re r gr -o -way -n n accord- ance with tine City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A P ^reel Map shall bo recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcol located 2G. rihe boun ary o re Tontat iWo Ira p nee s c ar ca on as foil-- o ows: 27. re or er shall be shown Uo con er -57 —67 ex s ng Perimeter s ree s, or title explanation required. ® Parcel Map Waiver 20. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map-Zertif'icato, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control Install or Bond prior to 13 Recording for ® Building perms` 29. Engineer shall submi� a hydrologic report for subject subdivision to determine runoff i major x 30. Proposed subdivisionfallswithin hthose h streets. areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. !; Flood Zone_ q K 31. A drainage cr-f —anne an or oo protect on wa a ong the ent re Wort pro= k' petty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be require go under sidewalks through culverts. 32. mater surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 33. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: 34. Prior o development o any parce roa scz e R required to assess impact of increased runoff. Aycontrib�tiion tosMaster e Storm Drain facilities will be required. I' RCE 20 i Mi see IIanaeus X 38. X 36. 37. 30. X 39. x _ 40. X 41. 42. X 43. —44. RCE 20 qt � „ 0 TENTATIVE MAP NO.II420 Pago 4 0 Dust abat4mant will bu made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. Noiso Impact on this project wili be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject. property. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. All Information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- qui red :^ rr•oper orading ane orosior, concro►, inc►uuing Eno preventiaeion or snoimen ra- tion or damage to ofi'sitq property shall be provided for as required. A preliminary soi1g report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division rrior to grading will be furnished to the Enginecrinp Division. The film of the tentative mapp or a )royal of s,in,e does not guarantee that senor treatment capacity will bo aval�ablo nt the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County 'dater District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said cortificdtion is received in writing. Tne Cit Engineer shall make the determination in accordance with Sectinn 66436(r.�(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably -Interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determine -0 tion within the specified time limits of said Section. At the time of Final I-lap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tic notes and bench marks referenced. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. CITY OF RAiICHO CUCAi4011GA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: LJ Date: April 9, 1900 To: planning Proms Jack . , it Subject: TENTATIVE ELVIiRSION the north CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11111 ORANDUM �rnnmLnolon Director of Community Development TRACT MAP NO. 11415 AND ..NV ll TO ACREAGE Up TIACf N0. 39� ) nldo of nnnyan, went of Doryl ;1 AnunsuWi� nr - - Loca%tad on BACKGROUND: Tito subject Tract Ifni) is the reoult of the decinion by the City Council to revert to acreage the recorded Tracts 9399 and 9400. Tract Non. 9399 and 9400 consint of 12 lota each on a total r.1 13.4 acres. The tracts were originally approved by the County and oubso;ucntly recorded with a bond being posted for road, sower and water installations, llowever, the bonded two year time of construction agreement expired, with no attempt having been made to start construction, and Council by btate law, find the right to: 1) Rnquire additional securities for approval of time extension. 2) Reversion of tracts to acreage Due to the desire of Council to seek redesign and tho City Attorney's recommenda- tion, the Council decided to revert the tracts to acreage. The City Engineor's report was reviewed by the Development Advisory Board and concluded that there are no conditions of approval. ANALYSIS: Ttne land in an existing lemon grove. Street improvements and dedi- cations can be made an a requirement of future development. Surrounding land one and zoning in no f- Ilown: Land line Zoning North Single family R -1 -20 South Lemon grove R- 1 -20 -T Cast Single family R -1 -20 Nest Single family R -1 -20 The Initial Study tins been prepared for the environmental assessment of this tentative map. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as provided by the applicant. The environmental checklist was completed by staff with no positive responses to any of the items; thus, leading to the finding of no adverse impacts as a result of the project. If, after review of the �t ITEM all' ITEM all' li Tontntive Tract Nap No.0419 April 90 1900 Palle 2 Initial Study, the Can►nianion findn the environmuntnl assessment to be adoquntu, then the insuancu of a Negative Declaration Would be in order. RECOMMLNDATI(Mi If, after review of the infomation presented harain the C.onmrioolon noncurn with the requenta, the appropriate action would be to approve tbo attarthed Resolution in addition to the isnuance of a Negative Declarat.(on and approval of tho City Rngineor'e Report an the conditions of approval. Roapectfully nubm ttcdp JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL: JMt tun Attachrnentas Exhibit "A", Location Map Part i, Initial Study City Engineer's Report Resolution w 1. 0 LJ 0 1. ,0 Hill i 0 9y �� i I: y;F; 0 she g \� Ica \ \.c,, No v. n t \ %I -�: \ Oki rVC� F ^/ "V y. \� MM� C W qn e, , \ or c IL I l 9y �� i I: y;F; 0 she g \� Ica \ \.c,, No v. n t \ %I -�: \ Oki rVC� F ^/ "V y. \� MM� C W qn e, , \ or c IL I a CITY OF ItANCUO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION S11E17 -r - To be completed by applicant Environmental Annosnmont Review Foe: $70.00 For all projecto roquiring environmental review, thin form must be completed and submittod to the Uavalepmant Review Committee through the department whore the project application is made. Upon receipt of thin application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare part xI of the xnitial Study.; The Dovalopmant Raviaw Committee will moot and take action no later than ton (10) daye before the public meeting at which time the project is to be hoard. The Committee will mako one of throe determinations: 1) The project will havo no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an onvironmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tr 0. u� M og a M P 11 41.5 _-- -- — wersian crcaJcL APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: C�l-i COUnc� NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTS CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: J o 1A e r 4 % ' /�s! C, D� 6►� . LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 12er 4, Std 44 3Ah .Ah toegL LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE ATE FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:, hl Y -� 0 ,O ow�.rr�.. low 4� 1 O t /1I L, d m \� , u , I two \ T � � Q ♦ o IN \ ` I AMA Ji0 \ °N '`u 1jsowN 0 i I1r6JnCT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION or PROJECT: iao a L �e'r . 839_9 _4-9400 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE Ot EXI TING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS/ F ANY: (3r ti Aorca (pro T�+I I lei � le,+i Otlg INK( d r DESCRIBE THE rNVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): LCrNo% 1;'rau 1. lh __ck aor( C -,A, 41-()--% Is the project, part of a larger project, ono of a series' of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? rl o x -2 VMsM�.� .r wow �. r .� ..rrr�rr r.. �...�.�.� •. _ rllilfV • W172! Z) TI I [ S PRWECT I X-r2% NO 1. Create a substantial change iri ground contourn? 2. Croato a oubatantinl change in existing .� noloe or vibrationl ✓ 3. Crsnto a nubotantial change in demand for municipal norvices (police, firo, water, sowago, stc.)l 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5: Remove any existing treosl How many? G. Creato the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials ouch no toxic substances, flammables or explosives? 0 Explanation of any YES anowaro above: _® IMPORTANT: If the project involves tho construction of residential units, eomlloto the form on the next page. CERTIrICATIO N: I hereby certify that the statements furnishers above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to tho best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may bo required to be submitted hefore an adcquato evauuation cnn be made by the Development Review Committee. (� Date 3'l8 -80 Signature - Title dad, l' J RESOLUTION NO. 00 -16 A RESOLUTION OP THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMML'NUINO APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. SO -04 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM A -1 TO R -3 FOR 7.66 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUT11- WEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. MD BAKER - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. 207 - 191 -31 AND 26 witLREAS, on the 13th day of March, 1900, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project{ and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of April, 19801 the Planning Comminnion held n duly advartisad public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Governmont Coda. SECTION is The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findingas 1. That the subject property in suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uae in the surrounding arcs; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding pro- portion; and ® 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that thin project will not create a nignificnnt adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Dnclaration on April 9, 1980. NOW, THERLTORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day of April, 1980, Zone Change No. 80 -04. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Changn No. 80 -04. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 0 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS KITH DAY Ole AI'RIL, J.900. PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OP IUNCitO CUCAMONGA llY: ilannan Rempol, Chnimau ATTEST__ Secretary of tl:a Planning Comminolo:: 1 ; I, JACK LAM, Socratnry of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucmaongn, do hereby certify that the foregoing Rosolut ion was duly and rogulnrly introduced, panned, and adopted by the Planning Coum:iaoion of the City of Rancho Cucaewnga at a rbgular meeting of the Planning Commin- oion hold on tl:e 9t1: day of April, 1980, by tl:e following vote, to Wits AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A•' f� 0 0 0 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RLPO1Vr DATE: April 9, 1900 'lot Planning Coauninsion FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development '1A DY: Michael Vairin, Associate Plnunar SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE N0, 00 -05 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - JUDITH AND THOM S''EPIII'NSON -- A change of zone from R -1 -1 to 11 -1- 20,000 for property located on the northwest corner of Klunman and Whirlaway, DACKGROUNDt The applicants are requesting a change of zone for approximately 3.3 acres of land located on the northwonl• corner of Klueman and Whirlaway (Exhibit "A "). The subject property in presently zoned R -1 -•l (Single Familyitesidential, one acre minimum lot size) and the request in for a change to R -1- 200000 (Single Family Residential on minimum ono -half acre lot). The applicant had previously proposed to divide the property into four single family one -half acre lots and di covered the zoning required minimum 1 acre. Thus, a zone change in now being requested that would permit the subdivision of land. ANALYSIS: Exhibits "B" and "C" indicate the adjacent land use and zoning which r: is described as followst LAND USE ZONING NORTH Flood Control SOUTH Single Family Residential R -1 -20 EAST Single Family Residential R -1 -1 and R -1 -20 WEST Single Family Residential R -1 -20 The interim land use element of the General Plan which designates the subject property as very low density (1 •- 2 units per acre). As can be oast, nn the existing zoning map the subject property is bounded on the east, west and aouth by one -half acre zoning. The majority of the homes in the surrounding area are developed on one -half acre lots. Therefore, the zone change request would be compatible with the existing zoning and development in the surrounding area. Further, the zone change is consistent with the General Plan designation of very low denaity. The Initial Study has been change. Attached is Part I Aft Environmental checklist was the items; thus, leading to an a result of the project. 3repared for the Environmental Assessment of the zone of the Initial Study as provided by the applicant. The completed by staff with no positive responses to any of the finding of !to significant impacts on the environment If after review of the Initial Study, the Commission ITQI "E" staff Report April 9, 1900 page 2 finds the linvironmontni aeeonomont to be adequate, the issuance of the Negative Declaration would be in order. ' CO1111L'UpONDENCL't A notice of public hearing wan published in the Daily Report legal ad section on March 20, 1900. In addition, notice of public hearing was sent to all proporty owners within 300 fact of subject property. To date no corronpondonco ban boon received oithor for or against thin project. RL'COIRD:NDATIONs If, after review of the information presented horoin and after the conclusion of public hearing, the Coomdouion concurs with the above onalysis and proposal., the appropriate action would be to recommend approval to City Council for a chnnga of zonu on the abuvo duncribed property from R -1 -1 to R -1- 20,000 as described on ttte attached Resolution. Rospoctfully outmitted, I - ; JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JLtMVicd Attachmentst Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Part I, Resolut Location Map "B". Land Uoo Map "C", Zoning Map Initial Study Ion ,ill I I `I 11 �1 � 1 'lll i'1 •l'r � 11 xlir ill r;i 111 d,i• .1 1.,11 11, I', •trl, !1 1 •1 ,1 t `� 71'1, ♦I�,,,. ' ;, x , 1 t 1 � I • 1" I ► LI 1 ,1' , t., 1 1 I �.' r I Wn f ' I�Y 11 , h ,,' y � ♦ x �,, I 1 ' Y 't. 1 1 t,. 11 1' �', .�.1 ! 'i ♦ , r' 1 �I t .�; is Iv ' J� 1 • ,�1' 1_ . ''1 �t r r� '•'1 cf l 1::'.C�. .. t. 7l� i _. _..i. I t , 1• 1 !1 , 11I ,1 .4w •h I i I r, 1 , 1� I' 1. I' , � I 1�1.r t �l 1 1 ; 1 y 1N 1 1 t \ 1 1 1 L 1 1 1't 1 t 1 , I 1 � L..1 { • tF 1 1 .Il •1� �� 1 1 I ,r t .l 11U 1 ':i l 1, I 1 1 I. r I1 r`. I •� i' I �. • 1�I r(�` 1 1:� 11`•11.1 1,'1 1 11 I i !11I1.r I!1 '.11' 1 (ilArlr 1 11� ��) I 111 i�llll 111. 1111 1 I 1':lall 1 11 '. l.1 I I�1 .i1 111 !'1� •11 {'.1 X1,11 l'1lr 'I 1 ' r ''�'lll .1'111 ,1'. ,f ,I�, y1.i ' {�. its 'I 1 A• 1' I ' � 1 ' 1 ''i' j 1 i 1' ,, I 11 F,'i' !1:1 .I1. � .1 i'1 Ir • '',11 I t 1 111 1.. �' 11, 1 I1� I 1 \i:^� / fi j 11 I.., �1 1 11 1 1 jl'�11 11 l r t 1 L ♦ , t , 1 ♦, ': iS�l 1'1r + •r, .t 1 S I k. !'I, t11 1 ai I' 1,'1'x'1' '. 1{ lit 111 11 i 11 ", "�11 l '1111 I I'tl'k 11 ,.II r t +li X1l1, , 1• 1 !1 , 11I ,1 .4w •h I i I r, 1 , 1� I' 1. I' , � I 1�1.r t �l 1 1 ; 1 y 1N 1 1 t \ 1 1 1 L 1 1 1't 1 t 1 , I 1 � L..1 { • tF 1 1 .Il •1� �� 1 1 I ,r t .l 11U 1 ':i l 1, I 1 1 I. r I1 r`. I •� i' I �. • 1�I r(�` 1 1:� 11`•11.1 1,'1 1 11 I i !11I1.r I!1 '.11' 1 (ilArlr 1 11� ��) I 111 i�llll 111. 1111 1 I 1':lall 1 11 '. l.1 I I�1 .i1 111 !'1� •11 {'.1 X1,11 l'1lr 'I 1 ' r ''�'lll .1'111 ,1'. ,f ,I�, y1.i ' {�. its 'I 1 A• 1' I ' � 1 ' 1 ''i' j 1 i 1' ,, I 11 F,'i' !1:1 .I1. � .1 i'1 Ir • '',11 I t 1 111 1.. �' 11, 1 I1� I 1 \i:^� / fi j 11 I.., �1 1 11 1 1 jl'�11 11 l r t 1 L ♦ , t , 1 ♦, ': iS�l 1'1r + •r, .t 1 S I k. !'I, t11 ai I' 1,'1'x'1' '. 1{ lit 111 11 i 11 ", "�11 l '1111 • 1 I'tl'k 11 ,.II r t +li X1l1, y � �'� 1!i �Ir �•1�'. � 11 � tllr 1 . ♦.1 i '. �� 1 'ilil Ir 1, .I,, •�,, .111', 111 Il' • t 1 ' 1 1 1'' '�,� I' 1 • 1 li,.l j 1 i. �pll l 1, 1 1, � I Ire r ll,t• •1 r.li t .1 ! 11 1 1 � I •' 1`i lC 1 I� 1, I .y; 1 v tl 1 ' It I) • 1 � 1 :1 1 1 s • l� 1 11 1•� t ! � r ..1' f �1 ♦ �' ', 1 1 I 1 4 1 J 1 1.1 e I 1 , 1 •Tr• 1 r! 1 ! 11 I` ' 1 I •b , I. .,,1 ' r/. 1` i I1 1, ; 1 • ;r: 1 I rll l , I , ,. 1 1 '.1 ' •,•' 1 \. •' 11 Ir .1 ail' 1 /ti'I , I ,I 1 1 / 1 ,. r i'9. I � , r ,1;' rl 1 1..'.' }r, I �1� I ' ' ' fl I 1;' I It 11 1 i "1 I 11 II '.'• II t 1I 1 �' 1 1 it rlj I ,.'. 1 1i'4 •/ G ' rl 11 �I ('� II •1�) 1 '1' 'L.d.d {. .11 �L ....I .i� Y ... '. I, 1 r,�. ,.1 ,. ' ' 1 ...1 �, 1 ��14. • , .'I i� 1 �. .l.r ,I 1. L1y11 1.. \1 I.. ��.' 4 � �. 1,�1 rrl • ,' I' f I /� r 1 1�,`I Irt ,' I I II a'�,, / III 1 111 L11 � 111, ' � ' �1•I 1'I , r 1 (�' '.II 11'4 I 1 11�,�" , 1 111 : "r��'1� 1�.'r� 1 {1 fIi 1 I; ,y ,{ Ifl, �' 11,1 � ,± ' •1 , ( �'ll I 11 II�'.1 ', I Ill I,tl�'�' 6. 11�1'� ',� �11 I 1.r Y • i Y yl 1�, 1 „�Il I r, Ir ' I I ' II. II ' .I 111 II ''r �1 I h �1 11 I�: , l 1' l Y rI I iL I RAW(mhAC- II I' Y 1• I ,1 q' '1 1 11r� MCI! L11 �.I •A �' I 1 1, I 1 r II I, 'Ir1 11') 1 1•i r 1 r II Iir. 1 Y' 14 11 , 11 ,14 .r 11 Mr +;r 1' .1 I ,I.I r. r' ' ILII I '' 1 r _ _ Ln • 1 • lli ,'� tn 4p 5CALE-11'e0c) 4 1 I ,1 1 11' • ., 1 n Ia'';.I''� ui \ rt • 1 Lit I 1 \ r. r� tp , I f 4 1 • , 4 1 I'. 1 � � • 111 1 ' , t I 1 •' , , n1 r � }� 1p iy , y 1�1 }�,�1'ir h iI nr 1 t: }I i\ •,, ' ,. 1 I t 1 .!'� i Yi I ♦I .1 /11d q 1. ;1 4�I I V Ll:' LI , 1 � s } � i �� ' A 1 1. •) ! I ' II I �i 7 1 •`4) >I � • I I I r I' f•] 'Jr. 1 11 � ' '�Y 1 4i. , • y 1 1 r I ��' � r.. , Ir I 1 � \ f !r • • 1 1'1 1 • 't 1 � ' Iv , 'I %/ � /t 1 �, � \ „ n , 1 ' t 1 • • 1 ?I I• I n •1 1 � ,'1 ' 1 t� r'1 � 1 y' + y { ♦ � I ._.. .... I .. . '*V4 ..:,L' .e •.�:r'I. 1 ._ -:... .I 1.. ... ....I. _.1.•. .1 .., .I t r..,•} .tl .... _. _,;' i CITY OV RANC110 CUCAMONOA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEEP - To be completed by applicant Environmental Aaooanmont Review Foos $70.00 For all projects x ;wiring onvironmontal roview, this form must be completed and submitted to the Dcvolopment Review Committee through the department whore the project application is mado. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis P�n.ff will prnprrs? Part II of the Initial Study. The 0ovolo1)mont Rovir.w Committee will'meot and tnke action no later than 'Can (10) days before the prblic meeting at 'which time the project is to be heard. Tho Committee will make ono of three doterminationss 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative DoclaraLlan will bo filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLES Stephenson Lot Split APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: yiamasG. and Judith D. Stephenson; 7881 Birchwood r_irclet L,a Palma, CA 90623 NAME,'ADDRESS, TELEPHONE CT PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Rob >rL• Gilberts Gilbert Engineering; 14730 Firestone Blvd, Unit 309; La Mirada i .LJ LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) No .street address. Project at west end of 'Ahirlaway Street. _ A. P. No. 201- 071 -40 and 49 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE: AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None — — Y.a s- a� r; r! 0 PAWEcT nESORIIwrION DrSCRIP'PION OF PROJECTt ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANYs ',otal ,'Icrgaac 3,30, No oxistina buildings, Proposed - .Four sinnla family 12SOmti51GnCSS4 DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONI• MAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), A1,11MALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASFECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION or ANY tXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEZTS) I This undeveloped property slopes about 10% about south 10 -13 degrees went, The site is covered with the normal +eb nn�l vneds and is n habitat for the normal small wildlife.in the areo. 'there are no trees on the site and no historic or scenic- chara:eristics apparent. _ .................... T'iere are no existing structures on the property. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series, of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Two additional single family 4 acre loL•n may be developed at a later time on this property. z- 2 _ X 5: Remove any existing tress? How many ?_ _ X G. Trento cho need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materinls such as :toxic substances, flammablas or explonivas? Explanation of any XFS answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. PERT IFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the beat of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date„ November 5, 1979 Signature ' 4J�� ii Title R. C. Gilbert, Eneineer ;'; z WI #T, TIITS PROJ%CT: i XLE M X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contoura? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration! X. 3. Create a substantial change in domand for municipal services (police, fire, water, ocwago, etc.): X A. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan dosignations7 _ X 5: Remove any existing tress? How many ?_ _ X G. Trento cho need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materinls such as :toxic substances, flammablas or explonivas? Explanation of any XFS answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. PERT IFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the beat of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date„ November 5, 1979 Signature ' 4J�� ii Title R. C. Gilbert, Eneineer ;'; z 1r. r i 0 RESOLUTION NO, 80 -17 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION HL'COMM L'NDINO APPROVAL OF ZONE CRANGE NO. 80 -05 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -1 -1 TO R -1 -20 FOR 3.3 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KLUSMAN AND WHHIRLAWV - ASSESSOR'8 PARCEL NO. 1061- 511 -6 AM 7 WHEREAS$ on the 17th day of March, 1980, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of April, 1980, the P.lnnning Commisoion held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Governmant Code. SECTION 1: Tito Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commisnion twit made tite following findingat 1. That the subject property is suitable for the woes permitted in the proposed zone in torma of access, size, and compatibility with existing land usa in the ourrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding pro - perties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environ- ment and recommends iosuance of a Negative Declaration on April 9, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Cali- fornia Government Code, that the Planning Commission of tiro City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day of April, 1980, Zone Change No. 80 -05. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council. approve and adopt Zore Change No. 80 -05. 3. That a Certified Copy of 01a Resolution and related material hereby adopted b; the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. gypp% ti. ri 0 0 APPROVED AND ADOPTED '1111.3 9T11 DAY OF APRIL, 19EO. PLANNING COMISHON 00 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA UYt Herman Rempol, Chairman ATrESTt Secretary of the Planning Commission M I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Ylnnning Commission of the City of Rancho %,ucar mgn, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reOulnr..y introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of April, 1900, by the following %oto, to wits AYES: CCMI1ISSIONERSt NOES: COMMISSIONERSt AUSENTi COHMISSIONERSt 1 Dotal April 9, 1900 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MMOHANDUM 0 Tot Planning Commission Fromt Jack Lam, Director of Conmun. "y Development Byt Michaul Vnirin, Associate Planner Subjects :ONE CHANGE NO. PP-06 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT k DELL MCD INC. - Change of zone from A -1 to R -1 for property 1 cated on northeast corner of Ramona and Church BACKGROUND: The applicant Ilan requested a change of zone for approximately 10 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Church Street (Exhibit "A "). Tlta subject property is presently *toned A -1 (limited agr '..cul- tural) and the applicant has requested a change of zone to R -1 (ningla family residential). The applicant has requentod a chnngo of zone for ultimate development of a single family residential project. Tito project site presently contains one dwelling and the romainder of the site in a citrus grove. ANALYSIS: Exhibits "D" and "C" indicate the adjacent land use and zoning which is described an followst Land Use Zoning North Single Family R-1 South Single Family R -1 East Single Family R -2 West Single Family R -1 The interim land use element of the General Ilan which designates designates the property as low density reeiden.4.al (two to five units per acre). Surrounding General Plan designatAons int.•cato low density residential to the east, west, north and south and medium dona'ty residential to the southwest. The project site in adequate in size and ihapa to accommodate the uses that would be permitted within the proposed zone. In addition, the pro- posed zone is consistent with the General Plan and surrounding existing and proposed land uses. The Initial Study has been prepared for the environmental assessment of this zone change. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as provided by the appli- cant. The environmental checklist was completed by the Staff with no positive responses to any of the items; thus, leading to the finding of no significant ® adverse impact upon the environment an a result of this project. If, after review of the Initial Study the Commission finds the Environmental Assessment to be adequato, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. ITEM "Fn I� I Zone Chmtga No. 00 -06 April 91 1900 Pago 2 COlUtESPONDE CEt A Notice of Public Nearing was published in the Daily Report legal ad section on March 209 1980. In addition, Notice of Public Nearing wall sent to-all property owners within 900 feat of the subject pruparty. To data, no correspondence has boon :aceived either for or against thin project. RECOMMODATIONt If, after review of the Information prosonted heroin and after the conclusion of public hearing, the Commission concurs with the above analysis and proposal, the appropriate action would be to racesmend approval to Clio City Cuuncil for the chnngo of zone on the above described property from A -1 to R -1 as described an the attached Resolution. D tfully a tmittad, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:MV tnm Attachmontat Exhibit "A ", Location Map Exhibit "D ", Land Use Map Exhibit "C', Zoning Map a Part 3, Initial Study Resolution 0 M n n �J i .111 •'1 1) 1 . \ U ' ' 1, 111 1 "�1. ,1�,1 � ',, 1 1i,i �',r ;1 111 I I , 1' ,•I,i i 11� 11:1 ,1 1 � � 'I 1 1 « '' + I,� 1 'tl ' 1' I , I 1,1' I 1 � 1 1 ,�I ' J + 1y • �� 1 11 I 1 '1 1 1.J i (, 1 11 \, •;1 JI � li .�' J 11 +Jr , � \ 'I. 1 I ' 1 \ '1, � i, ' � i, 1I •li I 1 1, r'll I 1 11. �il ��t Y 11 • ,r I ',� r I 11' ,1 11 • , ilil 1• ' I h,, I I I 1 „J MMM 1 I I 1 1 , i '. 1 1 1 II 1I' , ;I 1' 1 I 1 I, rl 1 1 �1 11 ,. 1� I 111, 1. � 1 1.1 I 1., �1 '! '•� i'1 it I\ 'rl I �1 11 '1''1:1) '.� �li ' J '1. 1' 'I I r � Il 1 ' i' I I-I I�,, ,1, 1' 111 h L,I 1� ,b � I'• I � �•. ,I' 1 I , r rlr �I' 1 1 1 I 1 Cp 1 i1 ' 1 •1 ",1 I, • ' � '�I �'Il•�IIII �d'll'1 ', ,�I L-j { ' ✓1j I 1. 1 I , ' • i. •'I `� Ilk '1 Ll i 111 11 chum a, r ,1 l� 1 , t • !••, ;11 r 111 1' M4P Lccaben 'r I •j y I1. �1', , • :1 171' 'f' ;.,.', 1 •,1� 1, , � r r, ,1, t , �Irr I `� n I it f1'.�l �,' 1[I'I�,LI LI' ! a ;••\ 11 �•,��. � ^11 V. • � ' �.,.' 1 t Y ' �t ' 1\ ,I 1 • +;I1 1 I.1 ,'Irf 1' Ir t 1 '� 1�� I 1, 1� 1 . 1 • I f ' ' Yf, 11 ! 1 I I I 1 i l , .111 ��', t, ! , t,! , .� , 1 , r , r "1•f �1' v l: 1 :i i � L. /.: 1 J' 1� II V YI i�'1 .1 1'h ' •'• li''' IMP.( I _ I 'll ,•I I '� 1 ' L' jl Y 1 1 �� ( r r 1 YII , I 1, r li. 1 I I� ' r I ,e. , .�.1: I� I �• 1.1'�.. I) I i ', � 1 � 1 � I� 1 i 1� I J ♦ �' J 1 I' I � I , �' � 1 i � 1 � I 1. I• li Ir�l I II 1, 1„ ,I •�::,,1 •��,�� -i� ', ,�� ,'111 I � ' � � � Y 1• � lt� �11r 1 I ,.. ±1, I '� • I YS 1 I�Ir .1 'Ill '�' ''1 •1 f' I l 1 i 1, I 1 I j l 1 w jl i f Y r ' f ♦•� 1111114J.- n ,r r '161 11 I.�I r 1ILLI 11 1 I I 1 1 • 'f li Ir. 11 i 1 ? � / '1 � ''. 11 " a� / r ter! / 1 '. L. _. 11 \ � �.I 1 �I 1 1., o y•. .1 r I li 1 � t. I I d , 1 I ', '1 III , , I' `� ( 'I• (I1 1 III'/ 1; 1'I1,, 1 •i�., '�'IV, I ...I fl l I li � � "1 I • 1' , 1 1 II , � �, 17 1 1' `.Iii )'..',I 1 '.,' I r , L �I III .'��„1 I 1,1 I �II I 11! ll I "1 � 1 �I',� pl V �i, 1 I�,Y I II 1, 1111 I 1 t,1 •I� II � �1 •' .,. 1 I 1111 11 i ' 'I I I �', �1� �,�,1 1 • 1, � IIII 1' .1• I ! 1 I I ( ' 1 � I• ti 1 . I I , 1' Y � ,' I I,. ..I i „ill 1 i I yy 1 1 1 1„ '1 L' 1 . ��, M n I w•11 .!1'1,11 „1, `11. ''r 11' �'• 1 I', 1�.1'' ' 1 I I •I / i ., I''. 1 1.' 1.P 1 ,111,�i J 11'f. I'll,;•,, Y ' �'I �.I fl 1 ,�I' "liar''.' � r 1'I',• , •1 1 I' 1 1Y VI I' 1 1' •� 1',I ' 'I I': 11, 11 I r �' ,1'•1'1 �1 Zone • 60 I l:r li 1 I I' 1r ,,1 �Ir fl,, • 1' 4 11 d ll� 1• f • 1 1 - 1 r ','t it ,' 1'y Il b r • nln 1� i f• 1 I 1 vl I; .I,'1 �1 11K 'r -,., t -..T41 II *L 1.1 , U �I, ( rk ll l,l +. .' 111 ` it 1 r'� I , ♦ / I �'� ♦. 1( ., �I J,r ,; VI / , r S 1 � .J A �. � _� +' •1'.1 I t 1 1 1 ,�.1 +I 1 ,+ 11 1. f�,/.. I I 1 1 1 r I, 1 w.. 1 � t 1 .Iy , 1 +. f ,• '1 1, ® 1 � Y l l 11 1 I �• ' 1 I • • 1 I , (O 1 1' 1 I 1 1 1. 1 - 1+ - � ” t. � � I � I 1 � t -: _ I r /� c l 1 I I � • 1� 1 1 �' 1 1 ... �, � Y 1 1 i c , . ' I CITY OF RANCIIO CUCANONCA INYTIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATxON SHEET - To be completed ;,y applicant Environmental Aaaeaamont Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Davolopmant Review Committee through the department idhoro the project application is made. Upon recaipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will propare Part II of the Initial Study. The Davelopment Reviaw Conunittoo will moot and Lake action no later than ton (10) days before the public meeting at which time tho project is to be heard. The committee will make one of threa determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Nagative Declaration will be filod, 2) The project will. have an dnvironmontal impact and an Environmental Impact Ronort will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report ahould be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROCTECT TITLE: 'S c 4E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: )ANICr% =N G NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE r�CONCERNING THIS,PROJECT: T O BOX /14-7 r)j, /4je,n 1 rJCATION OF PROJECT or %A-!FT nT PERSON TO BE ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO vvK- xe OY' Iha. WosT oZ(oS F 7-dF` Shc arc - LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSn dY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL,,,AGENCIES AND TSE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: V " 1 /\ .', 1 r I 1 •' All , I al. I n l.' I • Illi , , ,;1. ' rl I A ..•ya,l r CAI (I r 1 • n,1' 4( r rll ♦ •I r. 'r1Jr 1 lye�l r 1 ♦ 71 1 Ian �''IF 1 ''Y1 '11 ' A�w11 /.If•�A' 1• 1 I.1b 1I� I 1 , .. 1,..1•..•.elu 11 ��«r�1 •ea -rr• 1 11 ., e w_nw'1..•.. %.n rn! 4.. ' M1q•1 ..+•.I�W161r. �I a r 1(.�:'.r a I ! +('4wr '... 1 1 11'11 r '� II , 1 1 . + �_i1 h41 /(' I A I.S .r y I�11i I 1 I' •'4i it 4r1 1J 1 .' r ' 1 1 • I, 11 1.. .•' l,la I fl I 1 1 1 I ♦ 1 '(to ' I1. r11IfI 141• 11,1 }1 ty,A "-!1I II( �I \ II 'Ir •.I �'1 „II I 1','1 L+l. r 1�4 1 I� r •1111 1. rl 1'�jl ••1 /ILIif I ,1 , 1 ,.,,1 ( 11 1 1,,', '� 1 1i ,! 1 1 , ( I �; I,, 1 ,1 J 1 'I ! •' 1 kI ' 1'1'1'! :,'11 q .'• ' !'•1 • • 1 1 f1'Ii 1�' ♦ I S'', 'I • 21ON • • 1 '1; •j • j�'u ri .,, I ,•1,;11 I ``111;1 .111, ACREAGE PROJECT AREA • •• t • • • 1, PROPOSED BUILD111GS, " r II' 1 - I . DESCRIBE • t • PROJECT t”, PLANTS (TREZS) INCLUDING IN M-MIATION ON TOPOGAAPHY# • 1,,',' PROPERTIES, WE r)EscRiPTfoN or ANY 1.1•,1/111 •\ 1 • r 1� 1111 ' jl• " \/ •q,� . s' Mb tAp ' �- _ +I ,A 1 • 1 •� I��,: 'l l.j 1 • 1j��,i :tom '1 I 1'. ar .5'• I� ��'1'! '1 • . I• 111 Is the projecto of cumulative actions, which although individually small, le have significant environmental impact? may as i who I,.NI L 1 1 • 11, 1 ,r.. lI ',I 1 ,1• h, I ur'11' i ,r 1) r y 111 t 11.4 A 1 I 11 1 I \, rl�at 1 ,. - t Ia 1'. J r; r 1• • I , Jr -r,r \ �: A 1 11f• f11 ; 1 ; • .11.11 1 ! ,:1, `I.1r �\\ 1 Ito '1 X111 r� 111.i I , '1 1! 1'll /I "Idl sa ' 1u �r)1` I r�.`I'a \' r, I Ia I'• !�y \ •/ti' n ri 1' j� ' 1 I. '1 ,�'I �! ♦ t In a ij '1.r 1v' lt' IA .•, II ♦! I • l 1 ♦ t e Q I 1 ft ,1•i IS f 1 I I '• 1 t :��1 ( y 1 i I. I 1 �` 11 1 A -1 t • \y a ya •I � fr 1 •ti,91�. �, 11 a i ' / � t � i ' a 1, i n1 � � + Y r ' ' ri I II .� I I /,1 ' {1 �� '� II i y �,1 ,, I! � ,11�. '1 r -'� I ♦ �1 I ': , • • i• ,, •. 4' / If t 111' . r.: r .,1 J J! 1 r1 ♦ Ila 1,, • 1 J ; •1' • •I't • I' • 1 ♦ f 1 ' 1 y j � } I \1 •L • '• 11 \ ♦ .Y 1 i 1 y ( J i • 1• f ,f ; 1 r ';.V � + t 1 \ :IS � 1'. nfM I..L ,(• -0��•V ',I J) ! -.1 .i` ' ' f +:'11 1 '. 1 Al '.r',: a!!ar \'/I a+ I : In rlji4 %v ..�f a, 1'! ! r`S �1:• 1�1 . �d'x.r.. TttLS riioaicT: YES NO Create a substantial change in ground contours? --. 2. Croato A substantial change in noise or vibration3 existing ✓3• --- Croato a substantial change in municipal domand for Dervicas (police, fire, water, Dowager, otc.): 4. Create changes in the axisting zoning or general plan designations? --� 5: Romovo any existing troosi Iiow many? r. V� 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials toxic substances, flammables such as or explosives? 'Z-- — atian of r any ES answers above: 7}► n. LIFO_ TANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. 0 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand thzt additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the .Deve1 went Roview Committ e. Date y Signature,., Title 2 -3 HSSOLUTION NO. 00 -10 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANCE NO. 00 -06 REQUESTING A CHANCE IN THE ZONING FROM A -1 TO R -1 FOR 10 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF CHURCH AND RAMONA - ASSESSORS NO. 1077 - 301 -37. W11HREAS9 on tits 19th day of March, 1980, an application was fi3 ed and nceepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on tits 9th day of April, 1980, Lila planning Conunlasion hold n duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the Cali - foinin Government Code. SECTION It The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findinget 1. That the subject property is suitable for tits uses permitted in tits proposed zone in terms of access, eizo, and compatibility with exiating land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone chnnge would not have significant ® impact an the environment nor tits surrounding pro- portion; and 3. That tits proposed zone change is in conformanca with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this projeet will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on April 9, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65055 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga here - by recommends approval on the 9th day of April, 1980, Zone Change No. 80 -06. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. SO -06. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9th DAY OF APRIL, 1980- tvi PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DYt Hernutn Hempel, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission op I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning 03mmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forogoing Resolution was dul),and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissiou of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of thorPlanning Commis- sion held on the 9th day of April, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSt NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I ]IIr l: 1 0 0 1 H 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Data: April 9, 1900 Tot Planning Cosmnisnion F rams Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Byt John L. Mort inyA`aietant Civil Engineer Subjact: TRACT MAP NO.1 114 %v VUnnWU.l rAKU.V:, rusr r". Joe ASSG$BMRNT AWDESIGN - p'equeut to divide app into 114 parcols in tha M- zone located went of approximately 660' north of Foothill Blvd. I BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting to divide approximately 33.7 acres T of land into fourteen (14) parcels as follows: Parcel No. Acreage 1 -4 1.0 5 1.7 6 2.5 7 1.1 g 0.6 9 1.9 10 2.7 11 2.7 12 3.3 13 2.1 14 11.0 This review is for environmental clearance of the project and will also con - atitute approval of the Tract Map but not future development. This subdivision will create three a al lots for ownerah_ij?& ea -for -- three_ existing industrial buildings, an also create eleva (11) 'buildable" Tots in s -t -T zone. Plan designates this or.a_a minimum impact industrial on the west side of Deer Creek and mixed use on the east side of Deer Creek. The applicant previously applied for approval of a Parcel Map No. 5626. The Planning Commission did not give environmental clearance and requested staff to bring the project to Planning Commission for tentative approval. ITEM "G" rE u r .; m," ''id' .''r 1® I B I r: i. T.nct Map No. 11428 0 April 9. 1980 Pago 2 Tito nron in zoned M -R -T. A "T" standard wan adopted on thin site requiring a minimum of 150 foot frontago lots. Tito previous Parcel Map did not comply with thin ntandard. Itowever., the newly submitted Tract Map doun. Recently, tlne City Attorney made a chango in staff policy by no interpretation of the Map Act. lie states "industrial oubdivinions which create internal lots fronting, on proposed streeto must be done by a Tract Map and not a Parcel Map ". Therefore, staff has required the submittal of the Treat Map. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study, attached for your rovinw, indicates no significant environmental impacts created by thin project, Staff has field- checked the site, completed the environmental chockliat, and fuund no significant adverse environmental impacto. DMMENDATIONI It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for ct Ma 2 ed upon r w.q€,_tho InitlttL3tutlY AucLtil0.afndin_g of gnificant advorao impac s upott the onv— r:on nt. �'urthez_t adolZ< Pt tho'at �-o.n.,• ..,..rnt-t.., ..�.,.a�al —to r"TMQ "v No. 11428. Respectfully , I .., MME_ JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:JLM:nm Attachments: Tentative Proposed Land Division of Tract No. 11428 Part I, Initial Study City Engineer's Report Resolution r S , l i C. Tim 11112 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONNA INITIAL STUDY PART I - 11110JECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Lnvironmantal AanosamonL• Review Fact $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Davelopinent Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of .this application, the Env;.ronmentnl Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Davalopmont Raview Committee will moot and take action no later than tan (10) dnya before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Conunittoe will mnho one of throe? detorminations: 1) The project will have no environmonL•al impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have. an environmental' impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. 1 0 PROJECT TITLE: 4yieeb- MAP -#56e6 Y:- • !!ap 11Nze. APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 0 NAME, A1jDRESS, TELEPIiONE.OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJUCT•i L40CKWOOD ENGINEERINO AND SURVEYING CO., I11C.; 340 W. FOOTHILL BLVD.; RIALTO, CA. 9237 MI's LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS Atli) ASSESSOR PA1(CrL NO.) ,ST Or HAVEII AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 660' 11011TH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD III THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOZIGA, CA I rU - - LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE: AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: L,'U1D DIVISION FOR I1MUGTRLAL PURPO. E3. i�. (c, 0 I W CT jVSCgIP'rJON DESCIIIPTION Or PROJECT: DLVEL40PER WITS TO DEVECAP SITE INTO 14 IMIPINDUOTRIAL LOTS TO BE SOLD, AT A LATER DR ACREAGE Or PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE rOOTAGE Or EXISTING AND PROPOSM 1BUILDINGS, IF ANY1 ILME NtE 3EXI0TII70 DUILDIMS ON'T11E JOB SITE AT T11I0 TIM. BUILDINO N1(PARCEL #10T IB AFYROXII• T DESCRIBE THE •ENVIRONMEMAL SrTTING or TILE PROJECT SITE INCLUDIIIG INC'OPMWI014 ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANT'S ('FREES), ANIRALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEIIIC ASPECTS, USE Or SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DCSCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) i THERE ARE NO CULTURAL, HIOTORICAL, OR SCE111C ASPECTS ON THE JOD S PE 'T THE DEBT Uk THE APPLIVILIC113 10 WIMUE. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 110 AIL R 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan dooignationsl ,X 5: Romovn any existing troaal How many? 6. Create the need for Una or disposal of potentially hazardoun maLorials such as toxic substances', flarcu*ables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: N.A, IMMIlTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next pago. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished, above and in the attached exhibits present the, data and informnt•ion required for this ini.Linl evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fncL•s, statements, and informnti.on presented are true and correct to the best of my ):nowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may br: required to be st:bmitte.d before an adequate evaulat•ion can be made by the Devi•loliak -nt Review Conunit• tee . LOCKWOOD ENG., & SURVEY. V PORE: DATA DES CN, APPLICANT Date SAIIIIARY nl,- 10RO SignaL•u'r� —. .1k�r�� L' Jlk CARLETON W. LOCKWOOD Title PRES. & RCS 9101 yl L 1 YI��S MQ JX _ 1. Cronto a oubatnnL•ial change in ground. contoura7 _ X ?.. Create a oubstnnLinl change in existing noiso or vibr.ntion? g_ 3. Create a substantial change in .demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sawago, etc.)! R 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan dooignationsl ,X 5: Romovn any existing troaal How many? 6. Create the need for Una or disposal of potentially hazardoun maLorials such as toxic substances', flarcu*ables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: N.A, IMMIlTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next pago. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished, above and in the attached exhibits present the, data and informnt•ion required for this ini.Linl evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fncL•s, statements, and informnti.on presented are true and correct to the best of my ):nowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may br: required to be st:bmitte.d before an adequate evaulat•ion can be made by the Devi•loliak -nt Review Conunit• tee . LOCKWOOD ENG., & SURVEY. V PORE: DATA DES CN, APPLICANT Date SAIIIIARY nl,- 10RO SignaL•u'r� —. .1k�r�� L' Jlk CARLETON W. LOCKWOOD Title PRES. & RCS 9101 yl L a 0 0 RESOLUTION 140.80 -19 A RESOLUTION OF TIIE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING SITH APPROVAL 140. 80 -02 LOCATED AT 13195 WHITTRAM AVENUE IN THE M -2 ZONE WHEREAS, on February 280 19800 a formal application wan aubmitted requesting review of the above described project; and WHEREAS, on April 9, 19009 the Planning Commission hold a duly advertised public hearing for the above described projort. NOW, THEREFORE, TILE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site is adequate In size and shape. 2. That the site has adequate access. 3. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property. 4. That the proposed use is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 5. That the conditions listed in thin report are necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued on April 9, 1980. SECTION 3: That Site Approval No. 80 -02 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions: 1. The opening in the front wall, shall be widened to a minimun of 24' and the gate shall be view obstructing. 2. Automobile bodies shall not be stacked more than two (2) high. 3. All existing trees shall be retained. ` DIAIITMENT OF COMMUNITY DWELOPME0 ® STANDARD CONDITIONS Subjuctt S4C &QnrQ" ( 530- Applicant: y o 5 Locations l� l �� 1"; < t 4 kra+A /a,.UC K u P. Those items chocked are conditionn of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNII.G DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE* WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONSt A. Site Development l_ 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file T in the Planning Division and the conditions contained heroin. 2. Revised site plane and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive complianue with all. sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of nuilding Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sidayard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ S. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. G. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a G foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire District as "hazardoust, the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. _ S. The developer shall intoyrate a variety of approved roof materials and colors into the design of the residential development in a manner which is both compatible and complimentary among each of the residential units. % 9. All roof apourtenancos, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally %�- integrated, shielded from view and the sound but-fornd from adjncent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Duildino Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Ca.imunity Development. 4. Certification of compaction shall be provided . to the Foothill Fire District. S. The hummer head turn around shall be widenef to 25 feet. G. Thu existing structures are restricted in ure to an office and guardhouse. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION OF 171E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Herman Rcmpel, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commis- sion held on the 9th day of April, 1980, by thu following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 9 D. Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contnin a 12" walk adjacent to pnrking atoll. _ 2. Parking lot lights shall be a maximum hoight of 12' Prom tho finished grade of the parking surface rind directed away from all property lines, adjacent etraoto and rosidonces. 3. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 4. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 foot wide. �L 5. Emergency access shall be provided , maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 fa-L• wide at all Limos during constn:ction in accordance with foothill Mrs Diatrict requirements. G. All parking spaces shall be double strippod. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan ahall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A Master Plan of the Existing On -Site Trees shall be provided to the Planning Division prior to the .issuance of building permits and prior to grading to determine which trees shall be retained. 3. Existing Eucalyptus trans shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 301. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the discration of the Planning Division during the review of the Maxtor Plan of Existing un -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal shell be replaced on a tree- for -troo basis au provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. S. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the developments 209 -24" box or larger, 703 -15 gallon, and 109 -5 gallon. G. All landscaped areas shall be maintainod in a healthy and thriving condi- tion, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 5" Ci_ cans 1. Any signc proposed for tl%is dovelopment shall be donignod in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building pormits. R. Recreation 1. Tito dovolopor is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot__, Tract , on (data) , Y have road the CC &R's and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual reciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Slgned.__,__ Purchaser Said akatemont is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. F. Additional Approvals Required 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building �— Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to rocordatiun of the final subdivision map. _ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. in granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Vatianca /Conditional Use Permit _ 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete nonditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVIDION rO11 COMPLIANCE WlTII 471E rOLLOWING CONDITIONSt �I 0. Bite Development / 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, '7"'— Uniform Mechanical Coda, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable eodos and ordinances in offset at the time of approval of thin project. 2. Prior to isouanco of building permits for combustible construction, / evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill Dietriet•,.Cire Chief that _ water supply for fire protection is available. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a now roaidential dwolling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(a), the applicant shall pay development foes at the established rate. Such fens may include, but not be limited tot City Beautification Foe, Paris Poo, Drainage Pea, Systems Davulopmont Fee, Permit and Plan Checking fees, and school fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a now commercial or industrial dovolopmant or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development foes at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited tot Systems Development Foe, Drainage Feo, Permit and Plan Checking food. S. This approval shall become null and void if building purmits are not issued for this project within one year from the data of project approval. G. Street names and aridrosses shall be provided L•y the building offieal. H. Existing Structures 1. Provida compliance with the Uniform Building considering use, area and firo- resistiveness T 2. Existing Luilding(a) shall be made to comply Zoning regulations for the intended use or t1 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be to comply with appropriate grading practices Code for property line clearances of existing buildings. with currant Building and is building shall be demolished. removed, filled and /or capped and the Uniform Plumbing Code. I. Grading ® ' 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. yy; 0 _r 2, A nails report shall be prepared by a qualified onginuer licunsod by the State of California to perform such Warr, _ 3, A geological report shall be proparod by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan chock. 4. Tile final grading plan ahall be subject to review and approval by the Planning. Engineering and building Divisions and shall ba completed prior to recordation of tdlu final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichavor comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONSi J. Sndicationn end Vehicular Accons 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street riahtn -of'-way and all necessary sasamonts as shown on the tentative map. I X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following atrnntss , additional foot on ajh1'rVM- 101 additional rant on additional foot on — _ 3. Cornor property lino radius will be required par City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingroon to and ogress from shall be dodicatsd as followai _ 5. Reciprocal casements shall be provided ensuring across to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingrons, engross and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. K. Street Improvements _ 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. • _ ��_, 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited too STREET NAME w CU1UJ B GUTTIM A.C. PVM'P. K SIDE"- WALK URIVE APPR. x STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY x WHEEL CIIAIR itAMPS OTIIER K 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an enoronoh- �- mont permit and foes shall be obtained from the City Enginoor's Offioo, in addition to any other permits required. X_'4. Streat i,mprovomont plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Regiotorad Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvanants, prior to issuance of an encroaclunant permit. s. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Enginaer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. - �4 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. L. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsito drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: _ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and in subject: to the provisions of that program and City Ordinanco No. 24. _ 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting shoot runoff to streets. W 5. Ttio following north -south streets shall be designed ae major water carrying streets requiring a combination of spacial curb haights, commer- cial typo drive approachos, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landseapod earth bormn and rolled driveways at: property lino+ M. Utilitien 1. All prupoe;,d UL•ilitios within the project shnll be installed underground including utilities along major artorials lose than 12 IM - 2. Utility oasamonto a):all be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. _ 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sower system plans shall be designed and constructed to moot requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Piro District and the Environmental Health Dopartment of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from CCWD will be required prior to recordation. _ G. Approvals have nut goon secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval will be subject to any requirements tt,at may be received from them. N. General Roquiremento and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) y: C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Dthor:F� u n a W t+ CD ® 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R'n) and )' Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to tho )•` approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy tilti� ,- provided to the City. 4n ti Si J. Prior to recordation, a Notion of lntantion to form Landucepe and Lighting Districts shall ba filed with the City Council. Tho ongineoring coats involvad in District rormation shall bo borno by the davolopor. 4. Cinal parcol and tract maps ahall conform to City standards and procedures. 0 I ,J 0 0 CITY OF RANC11O CUCAIIONUA STAFF REP011'1 DATE: April 9, 1980 T0: Planning Comminnion FROM: Jack Lnm, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A chnnl;e of zone form A -1 to R -3 for property corner of Bnkor and Foothill Boulevard. - AonoiA our+araucriun - ed on the southwest BACKGROUND: Tito applicant in requesting a change of zone for approximately 7.66 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Baker and Foothill Boulevard. (Exhibit "A "). The subject property in-presently zoned A -1 (Limited Agricultural) and the applicant has requested a change of tone to it -3 (Multiple Family Ronidentinl). The applicant is requesting the zone change to bring the property into conformance with the Central Plan for future development. The majority of the property is still in graven and one dwelling in locntad at fho northeast corner of the site. ANALYSIS: L'xhibita "B" and "C" indicate the adjacent land one and zoning which is described an follows: LAND USE ZONING NORTH Foothill Boulevard, railroad C -2 SOUTH Vacant, single family R -3 EAST Vacant R -3 WEST Railroad, Commercial R -1 N The Interim land use element of the General Plan which designnten the subject property as medium density residential (5 - 15 units per acre). Tito pro- posed change of zone is consistent with the General Plan as R -3 zoning is a multiple family zone designation. Future development of the site as multiple family residential will be restricted to a density of 5 -- 15 unite per acre in accordance with the General Plan designation. The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate those uses permitted in the R -3 zone and such proposed zone in consistent, with the existing and future land use in the immediate area. The Initial Study has been prepared for the environmental assessment of the zone change. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as provided by the applicant. The Environmental checklist was completed by stafF with no positive response to any of ITEM "D" April 90 1900 h'ogo 2 tl►e items= thus, loading to the finding of no significant adverse impacts on the environment tin n result of thin project. If after review of the Initial study, thtu Commission finds the Environmental Anounsment to be adequate, an issuance of n Nogntive Declaration would be in order. COgRLSPONDNNCHt A notice of public hearing was published in the Daily Report 101101 ad section on March 280 1900. it► addition, notices of public hearing were sent to all property owners within J00l of the nubject property. To data, no correspondence hnn boon rocoivod either for or against this project. IN:COMMENDATIONI If, after review of the information presented heroin and after the conclusion of tl►e public honrinn, the Commincion concurs with the abuve annlyuio slid proposal, appropriate action would be to recommend approval to th►e City Council for the chnnge of zone on the abova described property from A -1 to R -J as described on the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, ,�A a u6L�'� JACK LAM, Director of ® Community Development JL:MVtcd Attachmentst Exhibit "A", Location Mnp Exhibit "D ", Land Uwe Mnp Exhibit "C ", Zoning Map Part 1, Initial Study Resolution b `1 1 O/4�t4�4A41 ��\ fbt I I �brHKt -- Q�1 r -- -- - ► I LNAC, Ott AC. Mt Subject raLot i d 0 - p�- operfiy SAO A96 ` � a M 1 s tK Ad t Zone Change 80- 04 t Exh b;t A 'a r 1 1 f' I I 1'. 1 Y � ..I �1 I � I I�' 1 S ' I I I" 'I l I . 1�• I �'1' L� 11 I, 'il ( r. 1 I I I I • � 1 i ,Dili II'f 1, 11 l'.' •. �. I✓ �,� '„I '''i 11 1� IDI ► '� '1I1 ''.r� �l ,' Ijl 2r d • I' 1 ;. L111, q r.lr, �� 1 I • I ��•1' !t'I I smut Ism Le1 1 s 1J 9 11 I rr II. m Its Uv ha rye 04 15E- MAP LAND U r '.'11!'•10 EI p. f 1 f i�' I rl,�� (� I�� 1'�. 1 Ir i '11�' ` , � r'..� �'{ `! •11 i 1.�• 1 S t 'S I t iir �I� ��f In,� I' 1 I 4 1 I Il �i ,� ', r ter, .. t ... r �. �. � I .. 1 1 II, !_ I ,,' .. I �. _ . ' • e _. . 1 1 11. I ,. 1 1 .I l '� �� ,I , I' rl I I I I I • A, �'1 � ' �i 'f� ' 1 r I 11�' I I ��. � I 11 I � 1 •' I . I I'1 1 .1, I, 1 ' 11 i �I � � ,I' 1 al � i11 i� 1 ' °'• i.l 1 Ili 11 I � � r ,II I. '•'Ir 1 •'r 11 1 I1 �'1, 11 I ull ri I ''f I I.,I � •r � •r I � 1 fr r I ,� O•� y l I ', 1 • r 1 �1' i I 1 .1 I1 I I 1'� �� ;.i1 rrlll• II•i r • I r 1'' ' 11. •�1 1 I ra zoning map Exhibit 11 Ili rl] 11 1 I:tilI .1:.. ^I 11..) LI I 1 ' '. L.i M ,�4 ! , �, ' 1 11. t� r Y I •'r , � t '�I �J I Y �G'. { � � "_. , ...• l a_ . t It I .:. �'S A � M':, .. 1'.. '1 � � ..d CITY OF RANCIIO CUCMIONOA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INrORMATION SHEET — To be complotod by applicant Environmental Assessment Review root $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental roviow, this form must be complotod and submitted to the Dovelopmant Review Committoo through the department whore the projoct application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. Tho Dnvolopment Review Committee will moot and take action no later than ton (10) days bofore tho, public mooting at which time the project is to be hoard. The Committeo will make one of throe dotorminationa: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an onvironmontal impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning tho proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Zone Change APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Acacia Construction, Inc. NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: dim Stayer - smmf- gs ahnvn LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) S.W. Corner of baker and Foothill (Orchard) A.P. No. 207 - 191 -31 and 26 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY PROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: 1 -1 ® RROJECT Dr$CRXPT;_QM. C'J DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTt "—io change to bring zoninn into conformance With Genoral PIL., . ACREAGE Or PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DUILDINGS, IF ANY: -Approdinately 7.66 acres Including existing single fam_I1v '--omo 2,600 sn:'ft, on Parcel 26 DESCRIBE TILE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) s parce 1. Is the project, part of a 'larger project, one of a nerios' Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impart? No X- 2 bl'f,,. WXI,L T117,$ PnOJ[?C : 0 Croato a nubsLantial change in ground Contours? X, 2. Croato a W>ntantial change in existing noise or vibration? X, 3. Create a nubsiantial chnngo in domand for municipal services (police, fin), water, nowage, etc. )1 X 4. Create cliangeo in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X gjkMjgk 5: Remove any existing troosl How many ? 0; . r, X 6. Croato tho need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flnmmablea or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: u 0 0 IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of rosidential units, comps eta the form on the next pago. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for tbli initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the iacts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate ovaulation can be made -by the Aavolopment Review Comn•itteGo�/. � d� Date J (/ signature Titlq x -3