Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/03/11 - Agenda Packet' Ili. .l..i "+ .1 'i � ,.I �. (� �/� �f1 +�v � i• �'�� I' ��yy + � rp nAI � r k "'� v 1�'IIP It �11l��•� 1 '1 i 1; 1 11 L, la li '.,r.,•.LI. 1 , yn i ,y I I `I I I Ili w 'n.I 1 �• / •S ' 1 � 1 4 tw I p .1 1 �t f f1 v �; CITY OF —^" \ r RANCHO CUCAMONGA O PLANNING COMMISSION y .AGIENDA. 1977 WEDNESDAY MARCH 11, 1981 7 :00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Action I. Pledge of Allegiance ii. Roll Cali Commissioner Dahl cX Commissioner Rempel - X Commissioner King X Commissioner Tolstoy x ,red Commissioner Sceranka III. Approval of Minutes A11 Approved November 26, 1980 4 -U -I December 1, 1980 January 19, 1981 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upoa by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. p- roved_ 4 -0 -1 A. REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION ON DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 9- 0 - ANGUARD A time extension request for the development of a 200 -unit apartment project on 9.3 acres of land located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Ramona Avenue B. REOUEST FOR A TTMF FYTrwcTnm n &i Tue nrrnnnor. ..., LnurcLn - A request for an extension of time to com- plete the redesign and alteration of an existing structure. 4 Planning Commission Agenda -2- March 11, 1981 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 1 -05 - AMERON - A 24,900 sq. ft. industrial addition to the existing 41 acre Ameron pipe plant located on the southwest corner of Arrow & Etiwanda Avenues with- in the M -2 zone - APN 229 - 131 -09 VI. Public Hearings The following items are publ.:c hearings is!: -h4r_h concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Approved 3 -1 -1 D. ORAL REPORT - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE to de a focused EIR in RACI' CT N0. 1158 - VARNELIAN INVESTMENTS - The develop - land use and transpor- ment of a residential subdivision consisting of 40 tation and impacts as single family lots on 10.8 acres of lana within the they relate to City R -1 -8,500 zone, generally located on the southwest only. corner of Carnelian and Highland - APN 201- 214 -05 Approved 4 -0 -1 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11549 To be brought back to LEWIS - A residential tract subdivision of 52 acres int Design Review 90 lots in the R -1 zone generally located on the south- west corner of Summit and East Avenue - APN 225- 181 -02- 04, 06 -09, 26, and 43 Continued to 3 -25 -81 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10316 MCUANIEL - A total residential devel ^pment of 9./6 acres into lots in the R -1 zone generally located on the north -east corner of Ramona and Church - APP: 208 - •181 -06 Approved 4 -0 -1 G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NG_ with deletion of items 81 -0 - DAON - The development of a retail center on i 2,4, & 7 from Resolution. acres of land in the M -2 zone to be located on the north- east corner of Naves and Arrow - APN 208- 351 -13 Approved 4 -0 -1 Its — delete. Three points of access. Storm drain to terminate at tracts. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11606 WESTEND - A residential subdivision on 70.32 acres of land into 277 single family residential lots in the R -1 zone, located on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way between Haven AvQnue and Deer Creek - APN 207- 221 -18 Planning Commission Agenda -3- March 11, 1981 Approved 4 -0 -1 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6260 with amendment to items WEAVER - A residential subdivision of 18.4 acres into 1 and 45 -1 percels within the R -1 -20 zone located on the east side of Carnelian, north of Hillside - APN 1061- 261 -01 Continued to 3 -25-81 J. ENV'IRONMEN'TAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6724 - DAVIS DEVELOPMENT - An industrial subdivision of 6.02 acres into 8 parcels within the M -R zone located on the east side of Hellman and the north side of Seventh Street - APN 209 - 171 -37 Approved 4 -0 -1 K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6726 - uRRAN Approved 4'-0 -1 Continued to 3 -25 -81 Approved 4-0 -1 Approved Res. 4 -0 -1 4VVna - wnInelra 1,VP1Tr1%%,AML rKVYCKiica, 11Vb. - A commercia subdivision of 2.47 acres into 8 parcels within the C -2 zone located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Foothill - APN 1077- 641- 54 - - -67 VII_ Old Business VIII. New Business L. DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -08 - C/L BUILDERS - DEVELOPERS The development of an 8,Z49 sq ft. restaurant on a .99 acre parcel in "The Exchange" professional office center in the C -1 zone, locateel on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue - APN 207 - 031 -29 IX. Council Referrals X. Director's Reports M. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY LAND USE CONSIDERAIION N. STREET NAMING POLICY 0. HCD REPORT XI_ Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here .re those which do not already appear on this agenda. Planning Commission Agenda -4- March 11, 1981 XII. Upcoming Agenda %III. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. This regular greeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned to a public hearing on the Victoria project on Thursday, March 12, 1981 at the Lion's Park Community Center located at 9162 Base Linn, Rancho Cucamonga, at 7:00 p.m. I n u C OF CITY OF RANUiO CUC:AMO1vGA PLANNING COMMISSI ©N .AGENDA WEDNESDAY MARCH 11, 1981 7:00 P,r1r LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RANCH0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel _ Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Sceranka III. Approval of Minutes November 26, 1980 December 1., 1980 January 19, 1981 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Comission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then It should be removed for discussion. A. REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION ON DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 9 -06 - VANGUARD - A time'extension request for the eves o� pment -6f-'—a 200 -unit apartment project on 9.3 acres of land located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Ramona Avenue B. REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION ON THE OCCUPANCY PFRMT- 611UKLA - A request for an extension of time to com- Tete the redesign and alteration of an existing structure. 1p Planning Commission Agenda J. K. -3- March 11, 1981 WLAVLR - A residential subdivision of 18.4 acres into 3,parcels within the R -1 -20 zone located cn the east sfde of Carnelian, north of Hillside - APM 1051 - 261 -01 r NVIRONMLNTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6724 - DAVIS DEVELOPMENT •- An industrial sub ivis of 6.02 acres into 8 parcels within the M -R zone located on the east de of Hellman and the north side of Seventh. Street - A A 209 - 171 -37 / , UONf - WATKINS OMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC. - commercia " �" subdivision of 2.47 acres into 8 parcels within the C -2 -d� zone located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Foothill - APN 1077- 641- 54 - - -67 VII. Old Business VIII. New Business L. DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -08 - CL BUII.bERS - DEVELOPERS J _ The development of an 8,249 sq. ft. restaurant on a .99 acre parcel in "The Exchange" professional office center in the C -1 zone, located on the soutueast corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue - APN 207 - 031 -29 IX. Council Referrals Y. Director's Reports / V �- M. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY LAND USE CONSIDERATION SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HELMS AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Jw`ti 1o1 N. STREET NA14ING POLICY HCD REPORT " XI. Public Comments This Is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. del Planning Commission Agenda -2- March 11, 1981 R C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMERT REVIRI NO. 81 -05 - AMERON - A 24,900 sq. ft- industrial addition to the existing 41 acre Amerrn pipe',,plant located on the southwest corner of Arrow & Etiwanda Avenues with- in the M -2 zone - APN 229 - 131 -09 VI. Public Hearings The followingr items are public hearings in which concerned Jndividuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. Al2 such opinions shall be limited to •nutes per individual for each project. D ORAL REPORT - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE CT N . 1583 - CARN IAN INVESTtiENTS - The develop- ment of a residential subdivision consisting of 40 single family lots on 10.8 acres of land within the R -1 -8,500 zone, generally located on the southwest corner of Carnelian and Highland - APN 201- 214 -05 1 ' E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11549 LEWIS - A residential tract subdivision of 52 acres into „ dots in the R -1 zone generally located on the south -- - / west corner of Summit and East Avenue APN 225- 181 -02- C,/ 94, P'­092 26, and 43 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10316 DANIEL - A total residential development of 9.76 acres nto dots in the R -1 zone generally located on the north -east corner of Ramona and Church - APN 208- 181 -06 G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. r 1-0 - DAON - The development of a retail center on 18 acres of land in the M -2 zone to be located on the north- east corner of Haven and Arrow - APN 208- 351 -13 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. "1606 WESTEND - A residential subdivision on 70.32 acres of alto 277 single family residential lots in the R -1 zone, located on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way between Haven Avenue and Deer ".- Creek.- APN 207- 221 -18 k 1, r t �i c ,r Planning Commission Agenda -4- March 11, 1981 Aft XII. Upcoming Agenda XIII. Ad'Journment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m, adjournment time_ If items go beyond that tine, they stall be heard only with the consent: of the Commission. This regular meeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned to a public hearing cn the. Victoria project on Thursday, march 12, 1981 at the Lion's Park Community Center located at 9161 Base Line, .Rancho Cucamonga, at 7:00 p.m. 11 6 .. �J 0 I� cti WD 0 G f a g 0 JIX f► �d jCrnCM *. Corporglon !larch 3, 1981 Gilbert Aja & Associates 23117 Plaza Pointe Drive, Suite 100 - Laguna Bills, California 9'L653 Intatnatoonat Mcadquertete 3100 West Bt0 Bepar Road Troy.Mlonpsn 48084 Attention: 1'1x Gilbert Ala Re: lC mart #7529 - Rancho Cucamonga= r Dear Mr. Aja: -- Your design package of the subject store, drawings dated 2118/81 and 2/19181, along with a sample board, was received on 2/26/81. Out Design Review Cosmittee reviewed your proposal on 2127181• We have found the basic approach of the design, with strong influence from the City, is extraordinary. We will accept your proposal only if the following modifications can be filly implemented. 1. The color of the metal mandard, cap flashinge and doors will be changed to "Brown", sample enclosed, from the imeritone 260E "Profound Blue ". The dares hardctooread. �Theimetaltpanelsnshould makes ory baked -on finish. Field painting is "Not Accepted". 2. The 18" 6 found concrete columns should vandals a with a heavy textured aggregate surface to discourage 3. The storefront glass should be the brown mansard. tinted in lieu of solar gray tinted to comp 4. The dimensio:. @ Deli Department, as indicated in my drawing dated 2/3181, to critical to hold. 5. The "Auto" & "Garden" signs, which appear on the front elevation of the building, are our sign requirements which must be maintained. 6. For consistency and safety in t11e parking lot,, we urge you to use 600 angle parking 18yout throughout a with the epexception @ the perimeter, where 90 angle P g 7. if landscaping is required in front of the T.B.A., only foundation plantings can be accepted. r &ilbert Aja & Associates - 2- Re.. K mart 07529 - Rancho Cucamonga. CA. March 3V 1981 The above items were reviewed u �Position' n dde to further clarify Ourr 2127/81. They ae rep Your fine efforts and cooperation towards the approval of these modifi- cations from the City are appreciated- Sincerely yours. Stephen K. It Design Division Construction Department Sr%L: -cd cc: Mr. J. A. Kilgore gar. Ivan Strand - The Strand CompanY p.S. please return the 8" x 101' color photo of our store in Auburn. California. J ? ti orate yti -a�� ova 'nyE� d.... �r ro� °HC d<%. ZC(ro0 rr�e --Y(pD z�a{ a o o r+ D o c m tO N m O d ... ^i (6 /7 p.-o 3 a O C N of _ C S C to O t0 O -R•• ° - Obi ; N? O N s to s d C 0 to — b 0. 3 to C ('7 J N S N JCL 7 N b `'' r `.•. ti(D (p N O ... c=h ' a 7 b - � � cbr O v j 3 z r � 0 a N tD N 2 "h _ -h � CA 4 C7i to O N n C3 .C�. c C to C-* (4 fu CD ( 1 N C t tq b t to C-) w CL o n C .N-."°a 3 � N c tc c•r Cl -'- u. - c z O ro (D Q v `� tc < -c < < N t' p O Im t N ry rb < N Z O (D .._. ... N 'Ni N w U ty. b N' p (Y• a< N N ' Z U N u eY• b C' = N N (pD � ash 7 Z .C; �7 -S f', C+ C•) fD ti CD A N N O 0 A M d y N < p O O N O CC) C-.) CD wc � p N O -•' O N ° m Ct (tp M� C+ nor E �. (rte CO N p ow b :3 cr D, k �rt n b •< d �• ro z C C C< O- O n. N• a �. w t" 0 t' Lo .p CD N O N o d (D to �. C O. (D < w ((D In, C< .-.� < w N H K tY•'° N 0 N _N. to (D a (<D �� O to ro t 10 N O Noo H Ro ON C* (D N (D + N w b t0 b M CO O CL O t0 O O O C C .O to to p Gf �• pp ... y N to Z N to > > p t O R7 O A N 3 g M J C C O U •N r C W V O N 7 Y •IA 7 C G a ° Y C O W IO S S C ri Z m E W W U N N OD r 01 r 0 r a) C O Cli 1 tY] Q1 r 1 O 01 D N m M r G IT C O C C O U •N r C W V 0 N 7 Y •IA 7 C G = C ° Y C O W IO S S C ri Z E W S- E f3 4- 4- E Lo 4- C]. V CL O= O n O O W O .Y C p Y C V W 0 C- 4J r-n C r V Y T Z >> > w- W VI W v) to W O > r C, W N U m m mm N O m m Q V LI L 4E L C O V .E C t6 C m ^ f� >. C L gJ C W 'A qCj n to n to 4J E Ca 10 ti C V 7 E C Y C-) d LW]'L 7 C Y O L EE ca E n d to E n to 7 E •O V�G) U G N't7 Q, V) O /8 = m cr U CI S m M 1 C O V, S V V O1 N m O EL O• C O C O m S O W O W ••- U N y U V Y C C •V1 1 Y V O W O {T. C W T C W C S aZ yE �= G. d O C 0. 4 O W O O O U O O C -i > d W L O tt O J GQ W W C m co W W N E C C O O > >�I.oi z o 4 o�rn v a o41c�a1 O •- L me Y Y r N N W •C •r• CC 0 L� L r r r W a' C C W r m L. p Ll- 4- l m O= E m O CV r O tn.O EN'O 0 rC U U =7 tnQ U N U COJO b I O 1 L t W M CU N C O r V >1 C C d I r 4- r C uc�i N to m o O Q 7 m O m mIn m O Yc W C > c W r C IN N 0) 2 4- C: C Q OC r t y C •a- L C C V- C Q O.-. w N m i Li W .N r O �•-. Z r 4j CD W � m E Gl O1 L 0 C S 0+4- 4- 7 m iv z tm4-- 4J r, Ny .(0 O 001 S OI b O.. Yo-_ W mYV O U C O L WY 0 N 0 3 M ro o E 4u .n (D Ica �' _ .0 �' a p' In L W U O i E m e U N {J W C 4E >� 1Ep r C 0 i 7i IIn O m E L L W b C L O d TY W r 0 t m., O W M YW m0 cM OL -, In LrN VV dW VV VrO C V) C' J V- W m CL y d m 4 CO U O Q CL W E to W to d lA O S i N F T IX CO W 4- C; cc Vi c Cp a a a� to w W� 1 x 0 c 0 tO m m a N h .•-1 M•.1 W p-, W W M•I i� --0 G r C W .. W ..� I•^1 O m OD m OD w w w OD w w m C) t7 w -r N -• N 0 J• I I (D CL n c a C W xto W o m o �_- �-+ m N m �- < to O m 70 n W '. o .. o CO r- �•• w _ S -+• -^ S - O O w to •- O to m O c-t. -II 7 -II O m m y 7 w o 7 ('I in < d N () G 0 0� 0 =r< < w < < S rt O. to -1.O x to (D O -(• C to • O w (D (D cr N m C to w c, �• •n w C w to w -s :0 C m 010 Q J to -.. ro to S to 0• 3 n -n S O c t+ J to S In -. O rt O 0 r- Q rt �. 0 D, y1 '• O w m w- K 7 w rt w +. Q tG --1J .r. O C+ r. w �•. �+ to ro o to LO -•• = to Ct.to w o to tO - tO -�•to to �• 0-s wvm l-:o.w owm I+ =wvm rt o, row w of .D o w w w t+ •s -• -�. a O w a rt 0 7 c•F S a+ w O. m 0 -5 c -0 •S (D C O to 0 -+, c C+ t4 to ca tD W tt Rm m rt to ro n => m o tort w � w -. x m 9 tD m In v1 w 1n to -h ? tD o Sm c In J -n -c1 o O to a (D [1 ro ••' N O> N 7 t0 to N (D in m 7 C S to O O -h m G �- O S to O O (D ID w t+ w in -+ N c 1, -h =0 0 .0 •'11 (D (4- -M O A In (D N L -'•K = 0 •s • . 0 (4 2 7 0 O to -• as �. -S n 0C) c w wwN On O C-) '<-h ten' nc O In w K -(1 w In m -+ ro 7 to �jy' K -h w t0 a d '17 S -•• 7 M-0 (D to rt w 2 •r• O (D to -•. w In -{ O -h 40 (D w d -• z m O -i1 S I -•' t� <+ -17 o m I C I I '< K O:3 I I K I S a C0 C J. w 0g O r.w 0 C5 C O CL ;-N gO B � c c m 0 0 7 O S 0 5 -n O 7 O S Q_ 7 7 C^ m s Q m Cr to c r. -0 O fi c1- w ro (•1• a J .t rt P1 ro (-I t•I (•I' O to to K K 7"S K 0) K =-5 N 1 (QD (QD N 3 to to O N tD c (D tD (]a CO) K •O to N • 7 (D aro (D N -1.O m to to m w J U3 C+ � tm w C+ -s O 0 7 O to •z O O O O 0 0 a 0 l =rtro v oa ro ro -b a C*jaB3 to to K =3 oo x> > > C') rt c* rt O rt c+ rt rt O ty t* C* -< C C Q p p -•h (D m0 J• t0 -* T tb -.. N fD (D c•F t+ to rt. = rt to (ti• M (+ O 1 j C) Qt7 w C Sn 0C) au C) Cl) Wl7 • w to 0 7 0 w ID O • 2 (D .0 O j w ro w 2 to C to -0 w O n ro w _ O C) •H1 -; c C -s C X n O rt y S O O O rt (D S 3 P to IG S t.7 .•• ••• Ch �• Z O to I+ WD 7 e•M S rt t+ S t+ ;cm 3 r lb K Im (o w rtK -S r. w c+K 7 C+ 7 n N " C+ z O CO to mm n cm O CO to w r0 n to c< to N 7 to C< G C< -C , <v CL (-) v am to am (D w tin � {0 CI' (T w U3 t0 J J (D O to 0 O to o O fi (ry o aCgg* rry v N•ro ro ~' N � m N to ((D N `D o x > > C o cCol. a+ O (� (+ C (+ t•I• C c+ cr c K o v1 0 (O a a� to w W� 1 x 0 c 0 tO m m a N h (] (') 40 to t0 t0 (a to S m OD m OD w w w OD w w m O -• -r N -• N Q J• I I I I I I I C co co 00 00 co m CO r- t0 N N N N A N A m a a� to w W� 1 x 0 c 0 tO m m a N h Y C vi E a w of r h O S t L � a CO N 'S. W � o" J cc C p 1 r w N r o W co m o) S I Q1 C U r r G N N OD 1 r CC ON I M m 1 N m Ln N N N m m m 1 1 1 r m m m T Ch Ol r r r D C 0 R + r ro ro •N Y +J ++ ++ F+ 4� O ++ O C C C C c c c J a., a a a a a a a O O a 0 0 O a O a O (v O a O a r Of r p r Of r p , p r O) r p C) av av a-0 av av 43 -a av o > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > M4J om 0) co om om om om om to �^ z �, Tc Tc >.c >$c Tc Tc In z ^S- 4J (U 41 0) ++a +)a) wryer +)Ea +T.+q�a�i •C r E •= .r •- e •7 r C C 4J L i L = i. 7 L r i •r E o a. E n E n n CL C, n � or o a o a o a+ °� O� U m p Up Up V G UO CJin CJO u 4; +i +) ++ iJ 41 +o CL n n n n M. n n Ca o C 0 0 0 0 �) 4J +) 4J +) +a Y J, +, a c cc c c c c z E E E E E acs we E w n n n n n E n a n c7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a a s a s w > > > > > > > •r > •r J a a $ a a a (V + (D 4) m p d p p d d •+- p •r to T T T T T T T•- T C) •r r T -•- •c •- •E._ '+- LU EC V U U 0 00 U V V C07 � L 1 1 a L 1 E an I 1 a L 3 f ro a 1 L a w O •o a •r 'a I m CD b y p i L -1 41 L m a In a i L 3.. N a 4- r •r L 4- o)iJ 'o U C7 a o d O N pIpT ^ C w Y C7 N 4- cJ C C C U 4- C n.+ f" •%- Y q p -, � E /° O Cal a C C .-. 011 U of O O c 7 a to L •r U + 4� = C .y L O x C 'a V ca L a 4J O) r EX: a s to O U» c •.- L i. i „y 3 S- `o ro r U ro L W 4- a a o V °a) of - d val -- L Nr °L OJ C _ aw = Q r C a W N W� J W F O a „Q y C L +) a-+ L C a U Q J. L p• n. Z 0 ro a .!_ t�f .c i O. ^ O tT 0. c O M U - V)= ITS N cm, r > r 7~ V e r d c L$- c J] 0 0, a d •o OS w .0 O 7 i O ro r V a U 0 O C ro L a G a •r E ro- M., O n c •r C + +) C > cup c ' V Cr c a >iJ 10 O ++4J cc 41 ro c •c c a L M w ro O o ca W LJ E S c "- W L> 'o W r Q +••, > o) w 4a W> W +J �1 > D C 0 R + CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regul_dr Meeting November 26, 1980 CALL TO ORDER: The Regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission was called to order at %:04 p.m. by Chairman Richard Dahl, who led in the pledge to the slag. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners: Jeff Sceranke. Herman Rem ?el, Peter Tolstoy, Richard Dahl Absent: Commissioners: Jeffrey King (Excused) Staff Present: Barryl'.hogan, City Planner; Ted Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Joan Kruse, Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner ANNUUNUbMt.N 15 : Barry Hogan announced that a meeting on the General Plan to be focused on the Alta Loma area would be held on December 1, 1980 at the Alta Loma High School auditorium. Nr. Hogan asked that the meetings of December 15 and 29 that had been scheduleo for General Plar hearings be postponed 'Jecause of the impacts of preparation of the General Plan Executive Summary and the coming Christmas season. Mr. Hogan stated that the Executive Summary was expected to be completed for distribution by December 15, and asked that further General Plan meetings be deferred until January. Commissioner Sceranka asked about a schedule for the Victoria hearings. Mr. Mogan stated that while a hearings schedule would be prepared, nothing would be done until the City Council has had an opportunity to review it. Commissioner Sceranka reported on the Financial Task Force meeting. Chairman Dahl asked about the Chamber of Commerce Industrial Committee. Commissioner Sceranka responded that they had met and reviewed the Industrial Specific Plan which was sent back to the consultant, would be returned, reviewed by staff, go back to the Chamber of Commerce Executive Committee, and then be forwarded to the Planning Commission. s Consent Calendar Mr. Hogan asked that items A, E, and D he removed from the Consent Calendar as they had been legally adve• :tised, and added to a special Public Hearing portion of the agenda Piotion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adopt a one -year extension to November 15, 1981, for Director Review No. 79 -58 - Vanguard - Tha development of a light industrial development to be located on the north side of 7th Street, west of Archibald. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, SCERANKA, REMPEL, DAHL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING, Special Public Hearings TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10491 : INGO HOMES - A total residential development on 4.78 acres of land consisting of 20 single family residential lots in the R -1 zone, located on the southwest corner of Victoria Street and Ramona - APN 202- 181 -01+. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adopt Resolution_ No. 80 -64, conditionally approving Tentative Tract No. 10491. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, DAH1. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING - carried- TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11564 - LANDMARK - A total residential development of 12 acres comprised of 92 condcminium units in the A -1 zone (pending zone change to R -2) generally located west of Beryl, south of Mignonette - APN 202 - 032 -71. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried, to adopt Resolution No. 80 -65, conditionally approving Tentative Tract No. 11564. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, REMPEL, TOLSTOY, DP.HL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING * * * * * Planning Commission Minutes -2- 1 1 - carrried- November 26, 1980 J I'll] '6 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT N0. 80 -02 (TT 11350) LESNY - A change of zone from R -1. 5 (single family residential) to P.D. (planned development) for 10 acres located an the northwest corner of Hermosa and Base Line Avenue and on the development of 117 lot townhouse development consisting of 114 dwelling units - APN 202- 182 -13. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranha, carried, to adopt Resolution No. 80 -66, conditionally approving Tentative Tract 11350. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: RMTEL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, DAHL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING - carried- Mr. Hogan stated that the applicant had requested that Item K be withdrawn from this agenda. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP N0. 6419 - TRENT - A residential subdivision of 5.03 acres of land into 4 parcels within the R -1 -7,200 zone located on the south side of Ulghland Avenue, west of East Avenue - APN 227 - 051 -06. Motion: withdraw isAYES: NOES: ABSENT: i6;' i Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to accept the al of this item by the applicant. COMMISSIONERS: PineEL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, DAHL COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: RING - carried- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6246 - WELLBORN - A division of 6.55 acres of land into 2 parcels for development of a church within the R -1 zone located on the south side of 19th Street, between Archibald and Amethyst - APN 202 - 111 -10. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. There was discussion on a proposed drainage easement and the effect it would have on the remaining lots in the parcel. Mr. Hogan provided information or. how the- swai.l on the property could be worked out in such a way so as to affect only one lot rather than the eight remaining. Mr. Hogan also discussed the possibility of flip- flopping the proposed plan for the church site in order to alleviate the drainage and access problems that would be created by this parcel split. Mr. Hogan further stated that one of the concerns of staff is the lot size and future expansion of the church without adequate remaining land for that expansion. Planning Commission Minutes -3- November 26, 1980 Reverend George Meadows, pastor, replied that the land area as proposed would satisfy the church's needs, and, if the congregation fills the church, another church would be built elsewhere. There was further discussion among the Commission relative to the church siting and the property that would remain on adjoining lots. It was felt that with the design, as proposed, there would be inadequate space for adjacent property owners to put in a pool or patio. Mr. Pat Brady, 9936 Victoria, a real estate agent, advised that he felt staff's recommendation relative Ln the drainage easement and using one lot rather than many could be worked out. He asked how large a drain would be placed in the property. Mr. Rougeau replied that a 48 -inch drain would be required with a 12 -15 inch easement. Mr. Ray Medina, 6874 Berkshire, Alta Loma asked whether it would be possible to place a mobile home on a residential lot and whether Reverend Meadows would be able to use lot No. 19 to do this. He also commented on the drainage problem. Mr.. Hogan replied that at the present time the City has no standards for placement of mobile homes on residential lots. However, i-c stated, the City is working with the County and other cities on the development of such an ordinance to comply with SB 1960 recently adopted by the State. As no one spoke either in favor or against this item, the public hearing was closed. There was discussion by the Commission relative to the adequacy of lot No. 19 for drainage and easement as well as access onto 19th Street, and configuration of the proposed lot split. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried, that this parcel mad, be approved subject to the condition that site approval of parcel one for a church and related facilities be approved by the Planning Commission prior to approval of the final map. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, REMPEL, TOLSTOY, DAHL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING - carried- ENVIP.ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 11173 - JENSEN - A total development (Multiple Family Residential - Condominium) on 11.2 acres comprising 72 dwelling units on 2 lots in the R -3 zone located on the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 181• -23. Planning Commission Minutes -4- November 26, 1980 I C] C] L' Mr. Barry Hogan reviewed the staff report stating that this was the second phase of a two -phase development. Chairman Dahl opened the p <Lblic hearing. Mr. Frank Williams of Associated Engineers, representing the developer, stated that Condition 11 to sprinkler the building would pose serious marketing problems for the developer. Further, the fire lanes that are proposed along with landscaping, would adequately mitigate the concerns for fire protection. Mr. Williams also requested that condition 12 be eliminated. Barry Hogan replied that condition 12 could be eliminated. Commissioner Tolstoy asked about soils testing on the fill that was used on Archiblad. Mr. Williams replied that complete soils testing will be done prior to the start of phase 1. Commissioner Tolstoy indicated th:,t particular attention needed to be paid to this piece of property be.:ause of the fill that has taken place here. Mr. Williams replied that the soils test addresses the problem and recommends that all debris be cleaned out of the area of concern. Jr. Joe Carman, representing Jensen Homes, 9051 Cottonwood, stated that he felt that Item 11 should be stricken because it would create a severe marketing problem. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that getting back to signing on Item 3, he would like to be sure that all buildings are properly identified and that pedestrian crossings are indicated. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, that this project be approved with the condition that the exhibit shown by the applicant for fire lane access will be acceptable. AYES: C0I1MISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, TOLSTOY, SCERANKA, DAHL NONE KING - carried- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80 -02 - WESTERN COMMERCIAL - The development of a retail center on 2.57 acres of land within the C -2 zone located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Lion - APN 208- 632 -48. Planning Cemmission Minutes -5- November 26, 1980 Commissioner Sceranka abstained from discussion and vote on this item due to a possible conflict of interest. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Dahl stated that having served on the Design Review Committee, and looking at the plan, it was mentioned that there would be the possibility of a vine carry through at the base of the planters and he did not see this in the plan. Mr. Vairin replied that there is a condition which requires it. Commissioner Tolstoy asked bow the parking lot situation, as far as access, works out. Mr. Vairin explained that Gemco will not give access and because Gemco :iad been approved previously, the City cannot now require that access to happen. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. Mr. Herb Horowitz, 3407 Olive, Burbank, architect for this project stated that he had reviewed the condition: and saw no problems with them. He asked for clarification of one item within the staff report making reference to flat clay tile. He indicated that they would like to go to a one -piece mission the as illustrated in their drawing. Mr. Vairin replied that this was compatible and not a problem. No one else spoke either in favor or against this project, and the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried to accept Staff's recommendation and approve Resolution No. 80 -69 with conditions. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN:: COMMISSIONERS: HEMPEL, TOLSTOY, DAHL NONE Y.ING SCERANdA - carried- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NQ. 5703 - JONES - A Residential subdivision of 1.17 acres of land into 7 parcels within the R -1 zone located on the west side of Center north of Monte Vista - APN 202 - 621 -34. City Planner, Barry Hogan, reviewed the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes -6- November 26, 1980 I] Ll There being no questions of staff, Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. Mr. Frank Williams, Associated Engineers, representing the developer., stated that he had been in communication with staff and was in total agreement with all conditions of approval. Mr. Williams indicated that all streets are improved and thus will not require utility connections or cuts in the streets. There being no further comments, the public he ^ring was closed. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by -aempel, carried, to accept staff's recommendation to approve the negative declaration and adopt Resolution No. 80 -70, with condiLi.ous. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANCE NO. 80 -16 - LANDMARK - A zone change from A -1 (limited agricul oral.) to R -1 (single family residential) for 1.5 acres located on the west side of Turner at Ironwood - APN 1077- 041-58. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11577 - LANDMARK - A custom lot subdivision of 1.5 acres into 7 lots in the proposed R -1 zone, generally located on the West side of Turner Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN 1077- 041 -58 Chairman Dahl indicated that these two items would be handled together. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. There being no comments or questions from the Commission, the public bearing was opened. Mr. Roger Cunliffe -Owen, Landmark Consultants, 902 W. 9th, Upland, indicated that the drawings presented show the building pad line and that the description on No. 2 indicates that there will be varying set backs of 20 -25 feet and this was taken care of. Other than that, he stated, they would accept all other conditions. Mr. Jim Kooyman, 7413 Turner, Cucamonga, Stated that he is south and east, of the proposed site. His concern, he stated, was drainage on Turner Avenue. He asked if Turner's curb lines would be widened at this point. Mr. Hogan replied that Turner would be widened and the curbs raised to take care of run -off. Further, that landscaping would soften the effect of the wall. Planning Commission Minutes -7•- November 26, 1980 Mr. ICooyman stated that he was basically for the proposed project because of the mosquito breeding condition that presently exists and which would be alleviated by this; however., he was very concerned about backwash water from flooding that might occur. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, explained how transitions that are more gentle would prevent the water from backwashing onto the existing properties along Turner. Mr. Rougeau indicated also, that Turner Avenue is included in the City's storm drain plan. Commissioner Tolstoy asked Mr. Rougeau if after studying the street going from wide to narrow it was found that something would have to be done on the other side of the street because of the transition, how would it be resolved? Mr. Rougeau explained how this would be done. Mr. Tolstoy asked who would pay for this. Mr. Rougeau explained that whoever was creating the problem would pay for it. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he has no problem with this development but he would not want it to cause problems for people downstream. Mr. Vai.rin explained that this was taken care of under Condition 13, which requires curb walls, etc. There being no further comments, it was moved by Sceranka, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to accept staff's recommendation to approve the Environmental Assessment and zone change No. 80 -16, and adopt Resolution No. 71. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SC--RA-WA, TOLSTOY, REMPLE, DAHL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RING - carried- Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to accept Staff's recommendation for approval of Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract No. 11577, adopting Resolution No. 80 -72, with conditions. AYES: COIMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Planning Commission Minutes REIPEL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, DAHL NONE ,ING - carried- -8- November 26, 1980 A. Y ENVIRONMENTAL ` 'SMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6395 - RANCHO CENTER Is ASSOCIATES - 1 . acres of land to be subdivided intd'3 parcels within an A -P -one located on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hellman Avenue - APN 208- 01 - -01 & 04. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report.. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the map shows a turn pocket at Base Line. Mr. Rougeau replied that this was where some partial widening was done; that future street improvements were not shown, only existing conditions were shoom. Commissioner Rempel asked if there was an easement for the water channel on the west property line. Mr.. Rougeau stated that parcel No. 3 would require some storm drains, as would parcel No. 2. He stated that the map is duly conditioned to take care of the storm waters. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the Beryl drain will handle all the things that would be coming into it. Mr. Rougeau explained where the new drain would tie into the existing drain and further indicated that a lot of the rocks at the railroad track would not be there to further clog these drains. 41 Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. .4 U-11111.1 Mr. Douglas Gorgen, 7333 Hellman, representing the applicant, questioned condition No. 8 of the staff report. He indicated that staff said that street improvements would not be required until the City had completed its storm drain improvements along Hellman. Mr. Rougeau replied that what Mr. Gorgen said is basically correct. Further, that a bond would be required for future improvements. Mr. Gorgen said that they would have improved Hellman but because of not knowing what the City wants, they were unwilling to do so at this time. Mr. Gorgen also mated that he did not feel that they should have to pay for future storm drain transition and they would not know what to bond for it. He indicated that he needed some guidance on that condition. Mr.. Rougeau explained the various methods of surety that would meet the requirements of the condition. I There was discussion among the Commission and Staft relative to the storm drain condition and requirements. Planning Commission Minutes -9- November 26, 1980 r, Mr. Gorgen also questioned Condition No. 45 relative to the flag lot that would be created as part of this parcel. He indicated that it would create some technical problems for him. lie asked if a mutual access easement that encumbers all three parcels could be worked out. Mr. Rougeau stated that this would go against the policy of not adopting land divisions that create land - locked parcels. Mr. Gorgen stated that he does not have an objection to it from what Mr. Rougeau explained; however, it creates a practical problem for them in developing the property because they would have to pay off the entire frontage, and this would create an unnecessary financial burden for him. Mr. Hopson asked if they would be in a position to dedicate after the first two parcels were developed. He continued that if they were improved, they would have to be paid for. Mr. Gorgen asked if they would need another parcel map as they are not really dedicating the street as it is a private one. There was further discussion on how a mutual access easement might solve the problem. The City Attorney explained how a mutual access easement works. Chairman Dahl asked if such an easement is legal. Mr. Hopson replied that it was legal. There being no further comments either for or against this item, it was moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried, to accept staff's recommendation for approval of the tentative map with cinditions and issue a Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 6395, subject to the addition of wording that Master Storm Drain improvements are not required as part of the street improvements for Hellman Avenue. This does not preclude necessary master plan storm drain improvements as required as -part of the Master Plan of Storm Drains, and the elimination of Condition No. 45. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: r,OMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, REMIEL, TOLSTOY, DAHL NONE KING - carried- Chairman Dahl asked that Item N. Discussion of Design Review Appointments, be continued to the next meeting, December 10, 19 80. Planning Commission Minutes -10- November 16, 1980 i ] a n w � M Commissioner Rempel stated that because of the change in his work location, he requests that Commissioner Sceranka fill in for him until the new appointments are made. Mr. Hogan asked for clarification and whether packets for Design view should now be sent to Mr. Sceranka until such time as new appointm.. :s are made. Chairman Dahl indicated that this would be the case. Mr. Hogan asked if Item M, Discussion of General Plan Goals could be deferred to the December 1, 1980 meeting when the full Commission would be in attendance. Mr. Hopson indicated that there was an item he wished to address relative to the Planning Commission Administrative Regulations, Item G -4, that a roll call vote would be taken on resolutions adopted by the Commission. Mr. Hopson indicated that such a vote was unnecessary in view of the fact that this is a 5- member Commission. He advised that this section be changed to reflect that a roll call vote would be taken upon the request of a:.3 Planning Commission member. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried that a Resolution be prepared striking the word or and reflecting that a roll call vote may be taken upon the request of any Planning Commission member. Mr. Hogan indicated that under the action taken by the Planning Commission relative to Victoria, a meeting had been tentatively scheduled for December 8, and continued once a month starting in January. He felt that t`te City Council would concur in that, and that the December meeting should be removed because of the impending holiday season, and further, that the December. 15 and 29 meeting scheduled for General- Plan review also be postponed. He stated that a new schedule would be prepared for the December 1 m >ating. He stated also that the December 24 meeting would be held on Monday, December 22, instead. Commissioner Tolstoy asked Mr. Rougeau to explain what the City could do to ask Caltrans to fix the pavement at 19th Street and Turner. Following discussion, it was moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Rempel, carried, that the Planning Commission request that the City Council send a letter to Caltrans requesting improvement at that intersection. Commissioner Sceranka asked staff to review a pavement collapse at AL Archibald and 19th Street across from the Stater Bros. shopping center. Planning Commission Minutes -11- November 16, 1980 Councilman Jim Frost addressed the Commission to express concern relative to the City advertisement showing the Victoria meeting at both the Lion's Park facility and elsewhere. He 'indicated that it is being very heavily advertised in the Etiwanda area.. Mr. Hogan indicated that at the beginning of next week new notices would go out clarifying those locations for meetings. Mr. Frost indicated that on December 11 there would ')e a town meeting in Etiwanda at 7:30 in the Community Room. lie requested that as many of the Commission. and staff as possible be in attendanc•?� at this meeting. Councilman Frost also stated for the record that the City Council, under the Mayor's signature, had directed a letter to the Hoard of Supervisors relative to the Lewis sphere of influence intrusion :indicating that legal action may be taken upon the advice of Counsel on the environmental issues involved. Following discussion on the issues involved in the Lewis situation, it was moved by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to adjourn. 11:45 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned to Monday, December 1, 1980 at the Alta Loma Jr. High School. for the continued public hearing on the General Plan. Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -12- November 16, 1980 d. , _ .. I I. E-1 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING December 1, 1980 CALL TO ORDER The Adjourned Regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commi.ssion was called to order by Chairman Richard Dahl at 7:05 p.m, at the Alta Loma Jr. High School., 9000 Lemon Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Dahl led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL Present: Jeffrey King, Herman Rempel, Jeff Sceranka, Peter Tolstoy, Richard Dahl Absent: None Staff. Present: Tim Beedle, Senior Planner; Barry K. Hogan, City Planner.; Edward A. Hopson, City Attorney; Jo ...n Kruse, Secretary; Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS Jack Lam, Director of Community Development advised that there were two tentative General Plan hearing dates for the month of December - December 15, and 29, and suggested that one of these dates be eliminated and the other rescheduled. Following discussion, it was moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, that December 18 be schenuled as the next General Plan hearing date and that December 29 be cancelled. Mr. Lam indicated to those in the audience that copies of the Draft General Plan were available for public viewing at ti:e City Hall offices, the public library and the Cha::£ey College Library, Mr. Lam then provided background information on the General Plan extension date and advised that the document must be adopted by May k, 1981 in order to r,.eet the State's extension requirement. Mr. Lam stressed the importance of feedback from individuals in the General Plan hearing process and invited participation from the audience for those issues relating to the Alta Loma area that were being heard at this meeting. Mr. Barry Hogan, City Planner, reviewed the General Plan goals, :dvisi.ng that the goals are an expression of broad statements that define the community's hopes and desirer> for the future. Further, Mr. Hogan 0 communicated the recommendations relativt to the goals for the Community Development, Circulation, Housing, RecreLtion, Public Facilities, Seismic Hazards, Energy, Community Deslgn, and Nitural Resource /Open Spare Elements of the General Plan. He stated that these are general in nature a«d do net state how or when they should be accomplished. Mr. Hogan indicated that the Planning Commission could discuss these now or go on with the agenda. The Planning Commission consensus was tlat they would come back to these items. Mr. Tim Beedle provided an overview to 'he Planning Commission of the General Plan recommendations for the Ala Loma area. He cited the land use character, Wt size, equestrian tra.ls, adjacency to national forest and floc! -- -tr.�jl channel and the fact :hat the ar::o maintains cleft - hoofed, equine. bovine animals and some poultry on private property. The area, for discussion purposes, was :ategorized into ,Alta Loma Hillside, Alta LomL South, and Alta Loma Chaffey and each areas uniqueness was pointed out through the use of slides. Chairman Dahl indicated that there woubi be a policy recommendation for equestrian /rural. area. Mr. Barry Hogan, City Planner, made a p-esentation stating that there has been a great deal of discussion regarding protecting the keeping of animals within the City in the area north of Banyan and to provide guidelines to City staff for the contim ed keepiug of animals. Mr. Hogan then read into the recor� a resolution %hick would establish a City policy relative to the keeping of animals. Commissioner. Rempel asked that poultry ba added to the resolution. Commissioner Tolstoy stated his agreement with the resolution but felt that a point should be made that if a pe•son in this desigr-ated area did not wish to have animals on hi.a property he would not have to. However, Commissioner Tolstoy felt that that indilidual would have to adnere to the provisions within the Resolution relative to trail connections and easements. Commissioner King asked Mr Hogan what he meant by the word "reservation" in item No. 2 of the resolution. Mr. Hogan replied that everything north o` the area bounded by Banyan and going all the way into the Etiwanda area would be preserved and protected for the keeping of animals. Mr.. King stated that iris concern was that animals would not be excluded from other areas where they may be appropriate. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Reapel, to adopt Resolut_on No. 80 -74 setting policy guidelines for the keeping of animals north of Banyan from the western boundary of the City to the eastern boundary, and further, that this policy be stated within the General. Plan text. Planning Commissioa Minutes -2- December 1, 1980 1 9 r There was a question from the audience relative to where the northern boundaries of the City are. Chairman Dahl replied that the area would go as far as the City boundary and would not infringe on those areas outside of the City limits. Commissioner Rempel stated that prior to the vote he would like to have public input on this matter. There were several questions from the audience relative to the maintenance district that would be established to keep equestrian trail easements in a neat and orderly manner and how this fee would be collected. Mr. Hogan explained how such a maintenance district would work and how areas would be able to annex to such a district. There were other questions relative to how quickly this resolution would become effective as part of the General Plan and how manor animals could be kept on lots of a specific size. There was further discussion of how this resolution would provide for the establishment of a trail system as new tracts are built in the City. Chairman Dahl called for the question to adopt the Resolution as amended. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, REMPEL, KING, SCERANKA, DAHL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried 5:2U p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:45 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Mr. Hogan stated that during this public hearing portion anyone wishing to appeal or request changers to t-c General Plan could address the Planning Commission. Mr. Hogan further stated that no development was being considered tonight and that any development to be proposed in the future must be consistent with bot:z the interim and proposed draft General Plan, before it can be considered for approval. Commissioner King advised that he wished to step down from particip« ion in the Roberts Group request because of a possible conflict of interest. Ms. Tony Quezada, 6201 Wilshire, Los Angeles, representing the Roberts Group, requested that densities be changed to allow 4 dwelling units per acre for a project which they wish to propose consisting of 86 acres at Beryl and Almond in Rancho Cucamonga. Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 1, 1980 Mr. Stan Sievers, representing Sievers and Sons, questioned the zoning on the property above stating that there was confusion. Mr. Sievers stated that he thought it was zoned R -1- 20,000, and that the Interim Plan showed the ptaperty very low density. Mr. Hogan explained the discrepancies in the zoning and stated that zoning is not the issue of discussion, but that land use designation is. Following further discussion, Mr. Sievers stated that it was their concern that the land use be retained at the previous designation. He asked for clarification and requested that the R -1- 20,000 zoning be retained. Mr. Chuck Schneider, Hidden Farm Road, voiced his opposition to the Roberts Group proposal changes in densities and asked about densi::y bonuses and what they meant. Mrs. Vera Smith, 9045 Citation, stated her opposition to the Roberts Group proposal, indicating that she felt this project would create traffic and school problems. Mr. Gene Susin, 5100 Carnelian, stated that he was opposed to the Roberts Group proposal. Mr. Dave Henderson, 8857 Hidden Farm Road, indicated that he hoped the project would not be approved because of traffic and other impacts on the area. 1s. Wanda Dixon, 9208 Hillside Road, was opposed to increased densities in the area. Mr. Dave Barker, 9003 Citation Court, stated that he hoped the Planning Commission was listening co the people and voiced his opposition to increased densities in this area. Elizabeth Pritchard, 9988 Almond, questioned the colors used on the General Plan map and asked for their definition. Mr. Hogan explained whet the different shades of color meant.. Mr. Ron Rulette, 9059 Citation Court, stated that he would like the Planning Commission to amend the resolution that they just passed or adopt a new resolution to zone only one lct per one - -half acre, 2 lots per acre, or R- 1- 20,000 so that the people in the area don't have to go through a General Plan again with the uncertainty of zoning. Dolores Arroyo, 5304 Falling Tree Lane, Alta Loma, felt that Mr. Sievers' proposal would create a safety hazard for those people who would not have any access from the hillside in the event cf a fire if t',e densities were increased in the North Alta Loma area. She further stated that it was the obligation of the Planning Commission to take care of the people. Planning Commission Minutes it -4- December 1;, 1980 F] G IJ Mr. Al Arroyo, 5304 Falling Tree Lane, Alta Loma, stated that $70,000 condominiums would not be in keeping with the neighborhood of $200,000 homes and did not know.what the City would do with more people. He stated further that traffic would increase tremendously in that area and could not be mitigated. Mr. Ray Farmer, 9079 Whirlaway, stated that most of his concerns had been expressed by others and cited that safety, especially for the children, rhould be taken into consideration, loss of property values, density and school issues were significant issues to be considered. He felt that these issues had come up many times before with the County and he did not want to see them come up again in the City. He also indicated that usually the only reason condominiums or apartments are placed in an area is to act as a buffer and he felt that in this case, buffering is not needed. Mr. Vernon Terrell, 8936 San Bernardino Road, stated that he was zoned out many years ago and hearings such as this will keep coming back every year. He cautioned those in the audience to be watchfi•I. so that their zoning wasn't changed and did not think that all the building that had taken place was needed, commercial included. Mary Barlow, 5434 Hellman, stated that she was concerned about increased densities and the quality of the City. She further stated that there was no law which mandates densities and as individual citizens they have rights as to what they want in their community. Mrs. Barlow further stated that she would not be against condominiums if they were kept 2 to the acre and did not tby.�aten the lifestyle of the area. Scarlet Beard, 5340 Carol Avenue, was opposed to the Roberts Group proposal and any changes to increase density in the area. Mr. Lee Nelson, 8259 Citation, asked that the Planning Commission reject the Roberts Group proposal and all future developments that compromise the valuable assets of the area. She further stated that he was opposed to straii,ing the school district's resources with such a proposal. Mr. Bruce Chitiea, Alta Loma resident, stated that the Planning Commission should tender the same consideration to the Hillside and treat it as low density. Mrs. Patricia Guyman, Alta Loma resident, spoke of increased school problems that would result from increased density. Mr. Ray Thomas, ?382 Hillside, identified himself as one of Ray's Raiders and indicated that he was responsible for producing a news letter to residents to inform them of what is going on with the General Plan. He asked those in the audience to attend informational meetings to keep informed. Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 1, 1980 Mr. Sam Angona, Rancho Cucamonga resident, stated that he was embarrassed by the pot shots taken at Mr. Sievers. He further stated that if it were not for developers such as Mr. Sievers, there would not be mnay people in the audience at this meeting. Anne Calinsky, 5468 Valinda, stated that she lived near Chaffey College and that their area would be experiencing 660 condominiums compared to the 340 that were proposed here. She further stated that the City Planners should tell the developers what the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga want. Mr. Chuck Buquet, Rancho Cucamonga, member of the CAC, stated that the CAC has asked that Victoria hearings and any p;.anned community hearings be suspended until the City Council had taken action on the General Plan. He further stated that he hoped the Planning Commission would keep this in mind because this is what they voted on. Chairman Dahl closed the public comments. Commissioner. Hempel stated that the Commission had heard considerable input from the Community and that the Commission will take everything that was heard into consideration. He further stated that the meeting tonight was not to make a final decision. He indicated that the Commission will go over the total concept of the General Plan, including densities, and that he definitely heard the voices of the people from Alta Loma. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he did not have too much to add but that this 5o a hearing process to listen to public input. He further stated •-­.t other hearings would take place in other parts of the City. He apologized for the fact that there was a 10 p.m. curfew on the use of the Jr. High School Auditorium. Commissioner Sceranka thanked the people who wer^ at the meeting and who provided input and assured the audience that the Commission has listened to their concerns. Commissioner King reiterated that he would in no way discuss or provide any input as it relates to the area or the proposed land use plan for hill-ide residential as this could be construed as a conflict of interest. He dicated that someone earlier had said that the Planning Commission -eady made up their minds about what the area's General Plan will took exception to that comment and stated that no decision will be made until all input on each subject has been received. Chairman Dahl stated that he was elated with the number of people who were present at this hearing. He indicated that the Planning Commission would consider all the input which had been r_:cei.ved. Further, that the Chaffey College area had not yet been looked ac and the Roberts Group would just have to wait to see what the decision of the Commission is. Mr. Lam stated that the •.ite of the next General Plan meeting would be announced. Planning Commission Minutes -6- December 1, 1980 C 11 n ,+' Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adjourn at 10:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -7- December 1, 1980 11 1 CITY OF RANCI-10 CUCAMONGA S'T'AFF FLEPORT DATE: March 11, 1981 70: Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Roger L. Lasby, Assistant Planner SUBEJCT: REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION ON DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -06 VANGUARD - A time extension request for the development of a 200 -unit apartment project on 9.3 acres of land located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Ramona Avenue. BACKGROUND: The attached letter from D. R. Huenger, Director of Land Acquisition for Fredricks Development Corporation, requests a six -month time extension for the above - described project. Fredricks Development Corporation is the current owner of the project. This Director Review was originally approved on April 21, 1979. One six -month extension was granted to Vanguard Builders, the original applicant. 'A second six -month extension was granted to Fredericks Development Corporation. The current extension will expire on April 21, 1981. An additional six months is requested to allow Fredricks Ueve�wpment Corporation sufficient time to Complete their fir.ancing arrangements with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Tio° grading plan and building plans have been reviewed by the Buitaing Division. Landscape and irrigation plans have not been submitted to the Planning Division for review. However, six months is a reasonable length of time in which to complete these reviews and to obtain grading and building permits. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a six -month extension, to October 21, 1981, be granted for Director Review No. 79 -06. i pectfully , submitted, RLL:cd ITEM A PREDRaCKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION �J r 18 BROOKNOLLOW DRIVE - SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 - (714) 549.4877 February 25, 1981 Mr. Barry Hogan City Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Request for Extension of Director Review No. 70 =06: A 200 -unit apartment development located on the NJW corner of 19th Street and Ramona Dear Mr. Hogan: Pursuant to our meeting with you on Thursday, February 19, 1981, we respectfully request a six -month time extension for the above- referenced project. Our current time extension is due to expire April 21, 1981. The additional time extension requested is necessary to allow us sufficient time to complete our financing arrangements through H.U.D. Very truly yours, FREDRICKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION D. R. Huenger Director of Land Acquisition DRH:df A SUBSIDIARY OF PACIFIC LIGHTING CORPORATION E A 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO.NICA �a C� "^ STAFF REPORT •M O } V F DATE: March 11, 1981 ca 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Roger L. Lasby, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FORA TIME EXTENSION ON THE OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR STTf APPROVAL NO. 79 -07 - BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH - A request for an extension of time to complete the redesign and alteration of an existing structure located at 9974 19th Street. BACKGROUND: The attached letter from Charles E. Engle, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Alta Loma Brethren 'n Christ Church, requests a one -year to 18 -month time extension in which to comply with a condition of approval of the above- described project. Site Approval No. 79 -07 was approved on March 28, 1979 with a condition requiring substantial re- design of the existing residential structure if it is to be retained permanently as a church facility. Plans for this redesign are to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. On March 9, 1980 an Occupancy Permit was granted and the church was given one year, to March 9, 1981, to complete the remodeling of this structure. Mr. Engle states that additional time is necessary to revise the Master Plan for the future expansion of the church facilities and integrate the structure and complete the required physical alterations, if the .church decides to retain the structure. With the exception of the re- design and remodeling of this structure, all conditions of approval have been met. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a time extension be granted to March , 1482. �ilkk; onn:nLL:ca ed, ITEM B A. our I have becor c „mare cb t +.he former Coy- n•:i.tte:, of COurct, bk,a ^oce conversation '.7ith you in roe.rd to U "e d.wellinZ� house on our rrox,erty. This is no .longer used a:: a but for of:iicc:, an othh er C'curc!t - vla.Lud actitie&. Ar I now una.:rctand 'Pie +ere }riven a. dead line to make some alterations to this house. eOwevCr, aince we hovo not come to a definite conclusion %.G to now we could fit Li.9.s buil. irg into the ilaster Flz:n for future exIt,,asion of our Church plant, ared becaa: iL woul:+ cost us considerable to make alteration.;, which in the lone ran wuoid not fit auit'ably into our pro_ros.d "aster Pl.n. iie, `hec•afoce be_ you to 2�iv�• us an extension of time, at le <,t a year to eight- een months to try to work out a suitable plan. Sinc ro Charler, 3 Engle, Ch.1irman, or of Trustees. L,3jECP G.0d [E 11D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1.iA1t 21981 A>a IM 718i911�a1111211121314t516 ')974 19+11 sL et P.0.?ox Alto Limn, Crnl:if. ?17rl rch. z7,'9`Z Ro: F e 041;y of ::wcAo Cucamonga IL ttent1.on Coma;uait,y "eve?.onrne•nt P].::,nnn —: Corr, iar:icr, From: .' ^.;arl -.- 'r: 'na].e, C•"ai.r- n nn-)rd or :'ru aez•:;, k1ta Loma Brethrc^ In Christ. Church Inc.. our I have becor c „mare cb t +.he former Coy- n•:i.tte:, of COurct, bk,a ^oce conversation '.7ith you in roe.rd to U "e d.wellinZ� house on our rrox,erty. This is no .longer used a:: a but for of:iicc:, an othh er C'curc!t - vla.Lud actitie&. Ar I now una.:rctand 'Pie +ere }riven a. dead line to make some alterations to this house. eOwevCr, aince we hovo not come to a definite conclusion %.G to now we could fit Li.9.s buil. irg into the ilaster Flz:n for future exIt,,asion of our Church plant, ared becaa: iL woul:+ cost us considerable to make alteration.;, which in the lone ran wuoid not fit auit'ably into our pro_ros.d "aster Pl.n. iie, `hec•afoce be_ you to 2�iv�• us an extension of time, at le <,t a year to eight- een months to try to work out a suitable plan. Sinc ro Charler, 3 Engle, Ch.1irman, or of Trustees. L,3jECP G.0d [E 11D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1.iA1t 21981 A>a IM 718i911�a1111211121314t516 1] ar --j v opoom I I lica ry 4 g VICINITY ITEM C CITY OF RANUiO CUCAM01NG1 d° c %CA.uo STAFF REPORT f , ® O - > a F_ DATE: March 11, 1981 1'-177 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -05 - AMERON - A 24,900 sq. ft. industrial addition to the existing 41 acre Ameron Pipe Plant located on the south- west corner of Arrow and Etiwanda Avenues within the M -2 zone - APN 229- 131 -09 BACKGROUND: This review is for environmental assessment to determine any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. The site and architectural design is not considered unless it is related to environmental concerns. To determine significant adverse impacts an Initial Study on environmental concerns is prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts or the potential for significant impacts. If a determination of no significant impacts is made, based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an Envirc,nmental Impact Report shall be required to fuily analyze the impacts of the project. The detailed site plan and elevations will be. reviewed and approved with conditions by the Planning Division subject to approval of the Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The applicant is proposing to construct a 24,900 sq. ft. plate - fittings building and attached employee services building on 41 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Arrow and Etiwanda Avenues. The following is the adjacent land use and zoning of this site: LAND USE ZONING North Vacant M -2 South Vacant M -2 East Industrial M -R West Vacant M -2 The subject property is presently zoned M -2 and designated Major Industry on the Interim General Plan and Heavy Industrial on the Draft General Plan. This project is part of the expansion plans for the Ameron Pipe Plant operation. Full street improvements will be required along Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue to widen the streets in accordance with the Master Plan of Highways. ITEM C D. P. 81 -05 Staff Report -z- March 11, 1981 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been com- pleted by the applicant and is attached for your review and consider- ation. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and has found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with such findings, then a Negative Declaration would.. be in order. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon an4lysis of the Initial Study, it appears that the project evils nst cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the project would be in order. Refpectfully submitte SARA /K. 06 N I� Plann BKH:DC:cd Attachments: Part I, Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit d, Initial Study "A" - Location Map "B" - Site Plan -• Elevations "D" - Elevations "E" - Preliminary Grading Plan E El i6 CITY OF RANCnO CUCP.MONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I -• PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fine: $x0.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative DecI.arati.on will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning is the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Plate Fittings Building APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Ameron 12455 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga California 714/899 -1716 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: George Griffin, 12455 Arrow Route. Rancho CuCamonga. California 714/R09 -173f; LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 12455 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, California _ County of San Bernardino, Parcel No. Pg. 229 - 131 -09 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building Permit - Rancho Cucamonga Building rivision SYrpel- Pnrmi+ - Rancho Cucamonga - I -1 PROJECT DESCR: PTION 0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a fact (ry building 75' wide x 300' long x 35' eave height and construction of an emplovee service building 25' wide x 100' Lna x 20' _ eave height - with necesrary utilities consisting of elec- tricity, air, water, natural gas, and septic t:.nk for sc- ,aaae. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF' EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 41 acres in the existing plant, with 114,990 square feet of existing buildings and 24,900 sgua feet in these proposed buildings; DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS 0 REES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC A:PECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES", AND THE DESCRIPTOOI; OF Ao7Y EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): T;ie plant site has been used for a concr(: ±e anc, steel pipe _ Man Uf actliri ng of ant' for ahnnt l S year­ _ The x Pa gonpral-1,y_ slopes across the property from North. to South approximate 13 feet in 8001 (1.6 %)_ IV There is some landscape planting at the northeri property line along the Arr-:w Route consisting of oleand >_rs and pine trees but the area in the plant around the area of the -Proposed buildingT is free of plants and trees. Is the project, part of a larger project, or_^ of a series . of cumulative actions, which although individualLy small, may as a whole have significant environmental incti) act? I- 2 A i WILL THIS PROJECT: YE:3 NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 11 X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? R 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X' 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? ____ X _ S: Remove any existing trees? Hc-, many? X` 6. Create the need for use or disposal of paten'-ially hazardous materials such ar toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. Not Applicable CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present t :he data and information regr.ired for this initial evaluation to r-he best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, ? further understand that additional information may :3e required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the .Devel.pment Review Committee. /`_ Date 1/27/81 Signature e�-' _ Amerc ::C Date Products Title Manager, Manufacturing - Engineering T_ 13 RANCI IO CU fMNION(JA PLANNING UN ISIU\ NORTH 1Ti:,%u DIpEGTcp lzevew gl-br" Trru :. l.00AT(DN MACS LX! ui;rr: = ` u 0 r I 11. 0 KOIO �.I. rSY[K "'a. I I pYp✓ MAKING. M[[IpMIw MwIjVN. K•rI _ / I OI IIOIXKry. CITY O R I: GHQ C�CANJONGA PLANNING DIVISION rylw.ro r V NORTH ITE%I: QC6CTL�. OeVI ';W SI X05 TITLE: J?LAW EXI11131t -_ _SONLE- "' FLAT6 Ftlr)HGgb $Qs1 iNc-4 CITY OF ITraI:QI_ pt� � �it1i�'C "o C�'Lt- „'I()lTGA TITLE: --__G ci�Sr P L4J PLANNING DIVISIGV EXHIBIT: _ SCALE: 0 r r'nm aR .�SC�e[Li_ Ltiw. fnN. ��I�Y.Y Irk 1IT NY_laZ -��" 1 IMMML ��I; T_ �• \Ngq.Y I.. M- IYYa mm mm mm FLAT6 Ftlr)HGgb $Qs1 iNc-4 CITY OF ITraI:QI_ pt� � �it1i�'C "o C�'Lt- „'I()lTGA TITLE: --__G ci�Sr P L4J PLANNING DIVISIGV EXHIBIT: _ SCALE: 0 r .--= . -- - - ur ® [ri CD I.1 - m CJ ❑ m ...�, a... a aJ �] c, ---- -- _.. - - - - - - -- t.. m CD ❑ CD ® LT9 EDO� ® m _Eeue F• ErAP&M6 V C C -.'5 � PLANNING DIVISUN ► XI mirr: C) SCALE, CITY O RANCI--j() CUCfijNjeaN(;A PLANNIIN(; urt rsiu� 15�� t" UitTH „-,:": gF ! o El 11 -- (, DATE: March 11, 1981 CITY OF RANCHO CLUJ ..CONGA. SMF REPORT T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: TRACT N0. 11581 - CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS - The development of a residentia subdivision consisting of 40 single family lots on 10.8 acres or land within the R -1 -8,500 zone, generally located on the southwest corner of Carnelian and Highland Avenue - APN 201 - 214 -05 ABSTRACT: ';he applicants have submitted a tentative residential tract subdivision consisting of 40 single family lots on '10.8 acres of land located on the west side of Carnelian Street, nG: °th of the BoJ'S Center. (Exhibit "A "). This tract falls wit: in the projected right -of -way for the Foothill Freeway. The project has been reviewed by the Growth Management Review Committee and has been processed through all resi- dential review procedures. After much discussion and deliberation on this tract, staff has found that approval of said tract could potentially create significant adverse impacts on the envi,•onment relative to cir- culation of the City and obstruction of the Foothill Freeway. The Cal- ifornia Department of Transportation has been ,:ontacted relative to the purchasing of this tract. They have indicated �Iiat procedures have begun in obtaining approval for the processing of acquisition papers for this land. Since it is not known if the tract will be F,irchased by CALTRANS or protected in some manner, it -s felt that an Env-.. - onmental Impact Report should be prepared to analyze the impacts that could be caused should this tract be constructed as planned. ANALYSIS: Please find attached a memorandum from the City Engineer which expresses his concern relative to the approval of tracts within the freeway corridor. The approval of a tract in this area bears great sig- nificance upon the Circulation Element which was recently recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. It is the City Engineer's opinion that an E.I.R. should be prepared which will analyze the impacts associated with the Circulation Element, the obstruction of the proposed freeway, and deletion of the freeway from the General Plan. Also, please find attached a copy of a letter from the Department of Transportation which states that they are requesting approval for the commencement of protection acquisition for this property. Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Part II of the Initial Study, the environmen- tal checklist, has been completed by staff and is also attached for your review. Based upon the potential adverse impacts relative to the City's Circulation Element, the Initial Study recommends preparation of an En- vironmental Impact Report which will focus upon the issues as outlined within the Initial Study. ITEM D February 25, 1981 Tract No. 11581 - Carnelian Investments Page Two RECOMh1ENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider input on this project. After such Consider- ation, if the Commission concurs with the findings of staff relative to the potential adverse impacts that may be created on the environment as a result of this project, then it would be appropriate to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report which would focus on the circulation aspects, the General Plan freeway designation, and the over- all impact of building within the projected Foothill Freeway corridor. Respectfubly ;submitted, r MV:jk Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tract Map Exhibit "B" - Memo from City Engineer Exhibit "C" - Letter from State Department of Transportation Part I & II of the Initial Study NOTE: A Resolution of Approval with conditions will be transmitted to the Commission prior to the meeting, should the Commission wash to consider approval of this project. 1. w4p "�• .n.a. «.er..+...+� nwwO.fw'abwiwwwR wn .o n T rvn wwn «. •.rn wow.• ��wnoa`M'a..amwa..w �v�www. — :�±T ��.�' —I �7 'O'J �JNIir73roMNa 'iV'�rNV .�1e�u1 7wii N/IIf7/ O. r r a f Y n. n) 4 L7 R4 rte, C: iW r7/7✓ — W . N w] a O W 2 F; 4 �HI QI <A t ; Y �; is - • „� � ,. Gj f Y n. n) 4 L7 R4 rte, C: iW r7/7✓ — W . N w] a O W 2 F; 4 �HI QI <A CITY OF RANCH�MONGA . M Um0F M 1977 DATE: February 19, 1981 TO: Jack Lam, Director, Conwinity Development FROM: Lloyd B. Hibbs, City Engjieer;/ SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 11581 As you are aware, the above referenced tract is located in tGeneraltPlanWis of the proposed Foothill Freeway._ A major goal of the tCityOta�d the overall from enroachmentdbyedevelopment that lnrconsideration and Of these facts lation Element, importance of the Foothill Freeway o the General Flan Circ uld not be in I feel that approval of any development along thefcorridor wO$ignificant conformance with the environmental impact on the Citynanddinoparticular. the rnutelaan Envi on- Prior to approval of any development along the Proposed Plan amended to reflect mental Impact Report should be prepared and the General the deletion of the Freeway.- In conjunction with these activities, all require CAtTRANC 1n n..rcf�'c t&, LBH:jaa cc: Barry Hogan Paul Rougeau Shintu Bose Michael Vairin efforts should ben ,,t encroachment. as ;;roi:ection a93i a� 1:"' 1; J ;,/ p C11 Y OF k! "JCM4 CL'CAP� OM,4 COMMUNITY UEVF ()Pr4F1vT 0EPr �c> 19 19131 AA! Ply 7181911o1111121112131415i6 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA— BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGEI4CY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION jftISlRICT B, P.O. BOX 271 N BERNARDINO, CALFORNIA 91407 February 11, 1981 Barry K. Hogan Community Development Department Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Ho,—,an: R A n FD AUND G. BROWN JR., G. �rnor 4 - ;PTY CIF R'41,c:io - L'CAt�9OP�Gq COMIMIJNITY VEUF'' OPMFN7 DEPT, AM pm This is in answer to your letter of February 9, 1981 concerning Tentative Tract No. 11581. In accordance with the information provided in your letter., a request will be made to our Headquarters Office for approval to commence a protection acquisition on this property, as it may be affected by the proposed transportation corridor. As soon as we have an answer on this matter, the City will be so informed. Very truly yours, J. E. PEDDY District Director By R. D. MORNIM TAR Chief, R/W Acquisitions (714) 383 -4483 ul G.1 r. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitteJ to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made_ Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will :;;ake one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a 'Nagative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will .nave an environmental impact and an Environmental Impart Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional infformtton-• report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information con --!erring the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TENTITIVE TRACT NO. 11581 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: CARNELIAN INVESTMFNTS, 888 N. MAIN STREET. SUITE 801_ SANTA emA PATTV n� NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: C. DOUGLAS GORGEN, 7333 HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF. g17'�O 71 io 7_ '20a — LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO..) SWC CARNELIAN & HIGHLAND A.P. NO eul — 21 — 05 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY. FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: NONE 1 -1 - i PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 40 - UNIT SINGLE- FAMII.•Y Y PUKTIUN ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: THE ENTIRE PROPERTY IS 18.7 acres of vacant land. proposed development would involve DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): THE PROJECT•SITE IS VACANT LAND (FORMERLY A LEMON GROVE WHIC'. *NORTH TO SOUTH SLOPE OF APPROXIMATELY 2 TO R PER CENT DRAINlNU EASTWARD TOWARDS CARNELLIAN AVENUE. VEGETATION CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF GRASSES. A ROW OF EUCALYPTUS TREES ENCROACHES IN THE FUTURE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF JASPER STREET ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY. _ ANIMAL LIFE PRESENT ON SITE ARE COMMON REPTILES BIRDS AND _GROUND SQUIRRELS. THERE ARE NO CULTURAL2 HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS RELATED TO THE SITE SURROUNDING L • - R-1-1UPOUU GRADED LOTS WITHOUT HOUSES: EAST AND WEST - VACANT AND UN-- DEVELOPED LAND: SOUTH - R -1 -8500 HOMES AND A SHOPPING CENTER. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a s -tries of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant envirormiental impact? NO 7- 2 • W LL THIS PROJECT= YES NO . — X 1. Create a substantial change i.n ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial charge in existing noise or vibration? X 3.. Crsaze a substantial change in demand for municipal servic =-- (police, fire, water, sex-rage, etc.) X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5Z Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 3) AS A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PROJECT WILL NEED SERVICES 14ORMALLY ASSOCIATE WITH SUCH A PROJECT. 1) A LINE OF EUCALYPTUS TREES ON THE WEST BOUNDARY APR IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page.. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submi.tte:l before an adequate evaulation can be made by a .Development Review Committee. 7 /) Date �' gL Title (70nP,i,J 41 ' I -3 11 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST _ DATE-2td %ee�ry �eE APPLICANT: FILING DATE:. 100 LOG NUMBER: --TT 16S78 PROJECT:-46 ° 5• _ BU %41WW PRO. =^.:."i LOCA.TION: �IS L`f 1�1 rlM _ 5�✓� F -W a. J b 1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all. "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). - r YES 14AYBE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have significant resents in: - a. Unstable ground conditions or in t7hangLs in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,. displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? L� c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? -Woo d. The destruction, covering or modificatioi of any unique geologic or physical featu•es? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or aff site conditons? i f. Changes in erosion silr•,tion, or depositi)n ?� g. Exposu.n of people or property to geologi: hazar's such as earthquakes, ,_andsl? des, crud - slides, ground failure, or similar hazard;? JC h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or i use of any mineral resource? _ 4*0** i 2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant results in: - r a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the col rse or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE No 1 d. Change in the amount of surface water in body any of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? -� g. Charge in the quantity of gioundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, _ or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? - h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for _ public water supplies? I- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? _ 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary -ources? -_ Jeo b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting dir movement, moisture or temperature? -- - 4. Biota -- Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: Z. Change in the characteristics of species. including diversity, distribution, or u-mber Of any species of plants? - Je b. Reduction of ,the G' or endangered speciesbOfsplants? unique, rare i Y 1 rage s a. Change in local or regional soc)- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? y100, _ b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land u.-� of an area? AZ_ _ b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental — entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? - d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? y� b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c Introdur_tion of new or dicz,ptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? __• 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: - a. Will the proposal alter the location. distri- AML density, diversity, or growth rate of the human of an area? _ population i b. Will the proposal aff ct exis[:i -.g housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic F= ctors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional soc)- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? y100, _ b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land u.-� of an area? AZ_ _ b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental — entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? A'S", Page 4 YES MAYBE NO 8. Transportation. Will the .::yosal have significant - results in: - a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular - movement? f b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? — f " d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? i e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? y` f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? —/ 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have - signifcant results in: _ a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results a. Crean r, >_ of any health hazard cr potential health na.zard'? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? b� c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to suc.:: organisms?i e. Tncrease in existing noise level -s? _AO f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. Tha as %ion of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? A'S", 11 zags D YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will Lhe proposal have significant _ results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? may^ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? Aeeo b. Natural or packaged gas? 4,eop c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? o f. Flood control structures? - Z. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? �. J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? 40' b. Substantial increase in demam' upon existing sources of energy? c. AZ increase in the demand for development of n!w sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? ,ar'c u YES MAYBE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable r scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Find.ngs of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate itizportant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A shozz:- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with. the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). a d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly,or indirectly ? -� _W rn 12. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVA:„ATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). se-We ATWH WT E A III-. DETERMINATION On the basis'of this initial evaluation: ® I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a 1NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on are attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the 00envirnment, and an ENVIRONMENT FACT REPORT is required. Date__ 2020.01 - El rage i PART II - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 2. �ydrolo - The project will be changing the a: sorption rates, drainage pattern and the rate and amount of surface water runoff. A grading plan has been prepared in accord- ance with the subdivision design and has been found to adequately deasater the subdivision without significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties. 5. Population - If the subdivision as proposed is constructed, this cou d alter the location, distribution and growth rate of the area as this would be blocking a main transportation corridor for this area. 6. Socio- economic factors - Th, result of the construction of this project within a proposed freeway corridor could change Socio- economic characteristics of the area relative to tar, rates and property values. 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations - The proposal, if con - structed,will substantially alter the present planned land use of the area. In addition, the tract is in conflict with objectives, policies and adopted plans of other regional governments and the City plan for the ultimate development of a freeway corridor through the site. 8. Transportation - If this project is constructed it will sub- stantially impact on the existing transporation system since it would prevent the construction of a freeway of high volume transportation corridor, thus affecting traffic circulation patterns throughout the City and area. In addition, it would alter the planned mass transit potential, if this area is ob- structed by the construction of this project. 12. Utilities and Public Services - The development project could have potential impacts upon the school system should the schools not be able to acconm:odate the projected amount of students that would be generated 5y this development. To mitigate this area, certi' led letters from affected school districts will be required which indicate that there is adequate capa- city for the development. — — C 0 IN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. o �`� ^.�p�C O F DATE: March 11, 1981 v 1977 10: Planning Commission FROM:? Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11549 LEWIS - A residential tract subdivision of 52 acres into 90 lots in the R -I. zone generally located on the sout"- west corner of Summit and East Avenue - APN 225 - 131 -02 through 04, 06 through �'I, 26, and 43 ABSTRACT: Lewis Homes has submittcl a residential tract subdivision in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance for review and con- sideration by the Planning Commission. The tract has successfully exceeded the thresiiald point limit and is now subject to review and consideration by the Planning Commission. Staff ties completed its detailed analysis and has supplied the Commission with appropriate conditions of approval should the Commission desire to approve the map. BACKGROUND: The applicants are.proposing to develop a 90 -lot single family residential subdivision on approximately 52 acres of land located on the southwest corner of East and Summit Avenues (Exhibit A). The sub- division is proposing minimum 20,000 sq. ft. lot sizes. The ~resent zoning of the site is R -1 (Single Family Residential) and the area is planned for very low residential uses at less than 2 dwelling units per acre. The majority of the site is presently vacant and undeveloped. Several stands of Eucalyptus are contained throughout the Site as well as some mature Palm trees surrounding an old residence in the middle of L •L.. The L' -- J 17l L L • J Le C. afI` ahe site- he exis ing wiriea�rny, iw�an.0 iS iieni8u ucc WIIIey Garcia House, was recently recognized by the City Council as a historical landmark. Surrounding zoning, land use, and General Plan designat?ons are similar to the characteristics of the project site. The Growth Management Review Committee has completed its point rating of the project which exceeded the threshold point limit and is now before the Planning Commission for its consideration. ANALYSIS: The project proposed is being developed in accordance'with the State Subdivision Map Act, the City Subdivision Ordinance, and the City's Zoning Ordinance. This project has been submitted as a custom lot /tract subdivision and has not provided specific unit design nor unit placement at this tiem. Ti,? Grading Plan does, however, indicate the location of each of the building pad areas. ITEM E TT -2- March 11, 1981 Staff ff Report e The Tract Map, shown in Exhibit B, indicates that access will be provided from two points along East Avenue and one point from Etiwanda Avenue. In addition, three future stub streets are being provided along the north/ south boundaries of the project site. All internal street improvements will be provided in accordance with the City Engineering Standards. Etiwanda Avenue is presently improved with rack curbs. It is recommended that the rock curbs be retained in order to preserve the character and image of Etiwanda Avenue. Minor repair to 'the curbing is needed in order to bring it into a good condition. The developer has tried to provide a street circulation system which provides some flexibility in the street design while trying to maintain windrows where possible. The conceptual grading plan is attact.. ,Ld for your revSew. The Grading Committee has reviewed the grading plan and has approved it subject to the conditions listed in the attached Resolution. The Grading Com- mittee has worked withthe applicant to provide a grading pl?.i which does not significantly alter the natural grading of the property. Only a minimal amount of grading will be done as necessary to provide a buildable area of the site. No perimeter or exterior parkways will be created by the subdivision. The subdivision was originally designed with a very rigid gridiron pattern which was able to retain mor, of the windrows than the present design does. However, based upon past Commission discussion, Staff requested a design with more curvilinear streets. In doing so, windrows will have to be removed in some places. It is our understanding that the Commission and Council would like to see selective preservation of some of the Blue Gums to retain the mature character of the area. In addition, replacement of trees removed to more appropriate areas was desired tc create new windbreaks. Therefore, Staff has r•ecommenied selective preservation and replacement of trees removed with a better variety of eucalyptus and planted in more appropriate ereas. In addition, there are several mature Palm trees in the vicinity of the Chaffey Garcia House. Since most of Etiwanda Avenue presently contains Palm trees along the street frontage it is recommended that these Palm trees be relocated along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage be consistent with the existing tree plarting pattern south of Highland Avenue. The Chaffey Garcia House which is located oz. `he project site, is presently designated by the City Council as a historic s ructure. To preserve the structure, it will require relocation to another acceptable site. It is recoauaended that the developer work with the Director of Community Services and the Historical Commission in the relocation of said structure. t•.�J L] f e a ppvpT iei: ( GQ J�YL Cc Ia v a �j yvn4an.A?`.e. Fae V � f Ij ETf SI' L•.. x y v 1 tf1 �•� .ri����'1�' NO; tii I a t. ry Y T •o i- w J'':L_ i; 'Ex J��;,I FFi 1�; jla acl I 1P ilk W \ i t• �� i L I� 11� w to I•j -� wl.,} 7 Gl Ir a � 1 Q 1• � —�T t, F' i LIB 9 1 t I ---�; ' ;{1� �1t LdnrirJfk� 'l• x •! 1 � 1 4 i `1 .,i i '• rye's ., _^ .��1 —� .. t: � "gam= il.�a:.l •uR�l. ,,`ri �I v ut mac_ � x' .I. F 1 • • . i... i .cam 2 .� < V d Y r Ate. • � a •� Di.. `'Y�1:!•� ",''(r-- ']:-k;#���: 4• n:l et.l:t�!J;r- '�'�!''F.: irllrlbr�'S tlt� -T e3' �• "' to a. :�� 'I�+ � "t -��, ��/ `: \� ILA•, •i 2 t 1. �1t *. cc ''° � N�`� �- _•I �f�� =1�� . .!° I ' 7,_�+�_. '�' yr_ i j\ p�, c e � : y �,lj_`tiI,•r' t : t � a t � �rf �l• `.� i 4I` a i`I !/YGH�' {,��-W—UlrI �r•i��l 1 . r.5jyo t} 34 Af IIO if cc o t° r•, I _ ' _ ,P 61 I � •1. .N((``•• mow-• • = �,G4��I -I 9 >� ` J'' �^7 � I , I� • i � kkkk = t,j�,= ,w`�_�,..t. L��—,, I• ..—x-31.` - J •-��T 'c �'�'P.i a•a. __ _•^- e�fa�'��•— as�T�wm- rua+ee �. 1 •O _- 7�1 111 666 I •z. tl 'dpuar ;. ry 4 Q � Q Q Q s pr t 14 Z is V. �IW k i W m R <I <a 7la F�Io � UI W VI a V F r• It E E � 1 _ V d Y r Ate. • � a •� Di.. `'Y�1:!•� ",''(r-- ']:-k;#���: 4• n:l et.l:t�!J;r- '�'�!''F.: irllrlbr�'S tlt� -T e3' �• "' to a. :�� 'I�+ � "t -��, ��/ `: \� ILA•, •i 2 t 1. �1t *. cc ''° � N�`� �- _•I �f�� =1�� . .!° I ' 7,_�+�_. '�' yr_ i j\ p�, c e � : y �,lj_`tiI,•r' t : t � a t � �rf �l• `.� i 4I` a i`I !/YGH�' {,��-W—UlrI �r•i��l 1 . r.5jyo t} 34 Af IIO if cc o t° r•, I _ ' _ ,P 61 I � •1. .N((``•• mow-• • = �,G4��I -I 9 >� ` J'' �^7 � I , I� • i � kkkk = t,j�,= ,w`�_�,..t. L��—,, I• ..—x-31.` - J •-��T 'c �'�'P.i a•a. __ _•^- e�fa�'��•— as�T�wm- rua+ee �. 1 •O _- 7�1 111 666 I •z. tl 'dpuar ;. ry 4 Q � Q Q Q s pr t 14 Z is V. �IW k i W m R <I <a 7la F�Io � UI W VI a V F r• It E E v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $50.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. upon receipt of This application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make oi.e of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmmertal impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tract Number 11549 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADLRF.SS, TELEPHONE: Lewis Homes of California, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, P. 0. Box 670 TT _. .... ..... 7l/. ufl C_nu71 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING TY.IS 8r')JECT: Ron Nottingham. Lewis Homes of California, 1156 No;tk- Mountain Avr_nue, P. 0. Box 67C, Upland, CA 91786 714/985 -0971 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NiO.) Etiwanda Avenue to East ..venue southerly of Summit Avenue, -, 225- 181 -02, 02, 03, 06, 07, G8, 09, 26, •.3 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE RND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Santa Ana Regional ka:.ri' Quality Control Board - Y -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 90 lot single fnmi)y rpaidrntjal dpvpl (gent �- ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE Cr EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 52 acres Existing Buildings - 3,000 s.f, approximately Proposed Buildings a 170,000 s.f. approximately DESCRIBE THE ENVIR0'%7%+?NTAL SETTING OF TIM PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORI-iATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The site has a £pntle slnup from rhp nnrrhnrper rn rlip �o�Z _ There are Eucalyptus windrows running east -west spaced at 330 feet, plus north -south windrows along East Avenue and at two interior locations. (See attached map showing windrows.) A portion or the site is covpd by an abandoned, nor..- maintained citrus grove. The only animals observed were the rodents, birds, and rabbits normal to the general area. There is an existin¢ very old house on the Dronerty. It anvears to be of marginal condition to maintain. However, we have been in contact with the local historical society and will relocate this house to an appropriate local location at our expense when the society has provided such a site. Uses of surrounding properties are shown on the enclosed site utilization map. Thesc uses consist of existing residences, vacant lots, the General Telephone Substation. and some orchards. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as :. whole have significant environmental impact? No. a -2 C l l `; WILI. TITIS PROJECT: YES NO �X Create a substantial change in ground contours? x_ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ 3. Creat, a sul)st •_ntial change in demand for municipal ..-vices (police, fire, water, sewage, eta.) ! x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove an- .xisti.ng sees? How many? 350 x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: The plans show the many existing eucalyptus windrows to be maintained if desirable to the City. However, approximately 70% or 350 eucalyptus trees are shown to be removed. Also, there is a small citrus grove which is not maintained which will have to be removed. (See letter dated 8/28139 with item 1 regarding possibly saving additional eucalyptus windrows along East Avenue and Summit Av.2nue.) IMPDRTAN.7 : If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the nest page. CERTIFICATIONt I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be s.-)mitted before an adequate evaulation can be mad, 13y the Development. Review Committee. Lewis Ho of California Date, January 21, 1981 Signature by�r Title _Iitno: i.zed Awn T: 1 RESIDE11TI %L CONSTPUCTION The following information shoule be provided to the City of Rarcho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate I.he proposed residential development. Wane of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Lewis Homes of California Tract 11549 Specific Location of Project: E:iwanda A),enue to East Avenue southerly of Summit Avenue 1. Number of single famil_: units: 2. Number of multiple farniJ.y units: 3. Date proposed to begin. ccnstruction: 4. Earliest date o- occupancy: Model tt and = of Tentative 5. Bedroons Price Rance PHASE I PRASE 2 34 30 /A N A October 1981 April 1982 rpril 1982 October 1982 PHASE. 3 PTIAST 4 TOTAL 26 N/A 90 N/A N/A N/A October _ 1982 N/A N/a April — 1983 N/A N/A 640 - 4RR $150,000 6 5 6 N/A 17 684.2 ° 684... - 4BR 135,000 9 8 6 N;A 23 685 - 3BR 110.000 8 6 7 N/A 21 687 - 3BR 130,000 10 9 8 N/A 27 b 7- tRR 155,000 _1 2 1 r N/A 4 ;`Note: The above are our best estimates at tris date (8/28/80) and are 90 ;:;;subject to change. Revi.:ed 1/21/81. — RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING•iENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11549. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11549, hereinafter "Map" sui:.a'tfed by Lewis Homes. applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San £ernaroina, State of California, described as a residential subdivision Gf 52 acres lr-ated on the southwest corner or Summit and East Avenues into 9C lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 11, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11549 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. f Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11549, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The Garcia House shall be preserved by relocation to another site at the expense of the developer. The developer shall work with the Director of Community Services and the City Historic Commission to find an appropriate location. 2. A detailed plan indicating which trees are needed to be removed and where new windrows shall be planted, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to final approval of map. The developer shall be responsible for planting new windrows where deemed appropriate by the City Planner. 3. The Palm trees near the Garcia House shall be relocated to the Etiwanda Avenue frontage by the developer. This shall be shown on the detailed tree plan. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Erosion protection measures at the end of Ash Avenue shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A letter from the downstream property owners agreeing to accept drainage runoff from Ash Avenue shall be required. 5. Complete hydrology study shall be submitted to the City to review the drainage impact on Summit, Etiwanda and East Avenue. 6. Construction of East Avenue improvements for the tract shall be coordinated with the construction of east side of East Avenue at the intersection with Summit Avenue which is a condition of approval for parcel Map 5441. 7. Existing damaged rock curb -and gutter on Etiwanda Avenue shall be repaired with similar type materials to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Dedication by separate instrument of that portion of Cassia Street outside of tract boundary shall be required concurrent with the recordation of the final map. Resolution No. Page 3 9. All existing easements lying within the future right - of -way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 10. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City standards. 12. Existing City road requiring reconstruction, shall remain open for traffic at all times with adequate detours during actual construction. A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost of the grading and paving prior to recordation of the tract map. On completion of the grading and paving, to the satis- faction of the City Engineer, the cash deposit shall be refunded. 13. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 14. Letters of acceptance from downstream property owners shall be required where runoff from the tract flews onto private properties. 15. Private drainage easements with improvements for cress lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated on the final map. BUILDING DIVISION 16. Surety shall be posted and are agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels, to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 17. Appropriate easements, for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted unto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 18. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering or protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to, or contributes to, drainage flows entering, leaving or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. u1S Resolution No. Page 4 19. Final trading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of Wilding permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rickard Dc.nl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March, 1981 by the follwoing vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I 1 ,M1 n Ll 1A r DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD �C�ONDITIONS Subject:_ 1111 13.,T „r fi�J�9 Applicant: j.�'W(5 yye4 Location: Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved sit; plans on file _ in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of _ approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to -issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect—at time of Building Permit. issuance. ARL 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation _ Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and _ located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill _ Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must tc approved by the ' Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for- review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. _e10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to otid approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adverse]y affect ad4acent properties. _ 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise mariner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. y%S 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this 'development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be .i-ncorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. —21. This development shall provide an option to home.buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. _Z22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum scopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards.-shall be-submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. - 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. _ C 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Flan housing policies and the.housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision - shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. _ 8_ Parking and Vehicular Access _ 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to narking stall. _ 2. Parking lot tates shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. —4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 0-8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the princ�ple soLrce of transportation for the owner. _ 9. Igo parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.G. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. _j,---'2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be- completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account•the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Div;si:n Ak during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Thone trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced o5 ? tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. Z4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size nr larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _ 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the fo'ilowing sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 700-15 / gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. vo 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. _ e7. All slope banks in access bf five (5) fee*_ in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such.slape planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continucusly maintained in .a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the rase of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. _ 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance -shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be 3vbject to approval by the Planning Division. — _. 11. A minimum of _ specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. _ 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along h. I D. Signs 1. Any signs proposed for Apvelopment shall be designed ir. conformance with the Comprehensive Sign OrdinaLnoZ and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the - Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit- 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. —3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit _ 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) -at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conaitional Use Permit. V/ 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract on I have rea.c; the C.C. & R.'s and understand t at.said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easemen for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access.. Signed _ Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. _Z6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. F. _Z7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior tc the issuance of building permits when no map is in*mlved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, incluoing all supportive infonnation, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. B. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (I2) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required tj reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICr'T SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: _ Site Development __J10o0'1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, an all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at .:he time of approve. 'of this project. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief tha". water supply' for fire protection is available. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) nr ma-nr addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fe %s at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to- City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. q. Prime to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition tq an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the esfEablished rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. S. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. S. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the 6riform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading __te%1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the – approved conceptual grading plan. �2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of appli::ation for grading plan check. __Z4. The final grading ?ian shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineerinc,, and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes V rst. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE W7TH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Dedications and Vehicular Access i. Dedications shall be made by final map -of all interior street - rights -of -way - -/ and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. e0 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the '— following streets: pp- � additional feet onG�'4Te7wc additional feet onlr_ additional feet on i 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City st.-�ndards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress From shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress dnd internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements I_ Construct full street . improvements. including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. .e 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: IV V 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other pera;i *_s required. 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shal'i be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment per -nit. . Surely shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney; guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the -map or the issuance of- building Permits, whichever comes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking_ traffic and street neme signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 0 CURB & A.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET A.C. WHEEL STREET NAME GUTTER PVMT. WALK APPP. LIGHTS-1 OVERLAY CH, AIR RAMPS OTHER 400 � . _ sy+ moo w05 'w ` smm WOM data woo 400 0000 m� y IV V 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other pera;i *_s required. 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shal'i be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment per -nit. . Surely shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney; guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the -map or the issuance of- building Permits, whichever comes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking_ traffic and street neme signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 0 L. Utilities M. r �I. Ali proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground includ-ir, utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. — 2. �4. 5. 6. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies ano the City Engineer. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. Approvals have not beep? _ecured from all utilities agencies involved. Approval of the final map will requirements that may be received from them. General Requirements and Approvals and other 1°nterested be subject to any I. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatement -required prior to issuance of a grading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District 0. Other: K. Drainage and Flood Control _. 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject .:; ing under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subjec° to t'. ::: sions -of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. _ 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities M. r �I. Ali proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground includ-ir, utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. — 2. �4. 5. 6. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies ano the City Engineer. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. Approvals have not beep? _ecured from all utilities agencies involved. Approval of the final map will requirements that may be received from them. General Requirements and Approvals and other 1°nterested be subject to any I. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatement -required prior to issuance of a grading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District 0. Other: 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this nap and a ropy provided to the City. _ 3. Prior to recordaticn, a Notice of intention ?!6A form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs. involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. a., _ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shaii conform to City standards and procedures. r.� 11 0 lu CI'T'Y CF RE1 NCHO CLVvAMONGA Sir REPORT DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan C:,leman, Assistant Plantar SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANT TENTATIVE -TRACT NO. 10316 McDANIEL - A tots resi enVa development -of 9. acres into 33 lots in the R -1 zone: generally located on the northeast corner of Ramona „nd Church - APN 208- 181 -06 Gt�CP yt) oP ll; BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of a 9.76 acre resi- dential subdivision located on the northeast corner of Ramona. and Church (Exhibit "A "). The site is presently zaned R -1, with an existing single family residence on the corner. The site is presently being farmed for citrus. Several stands of Eucalyptus exist around the perimeter of the site. The Interim General Plan indicates low density residential (2 to 5 units per acre), and the Proposed General Plan indicates tow density residential (2 to 4 units per acre). Sirrounding properties are similarly developed with single family residential subdivisions. The proposal hds been reviewed as a total development package by the Growth Management and Design Review Committees in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance, and received a point rating which exceeds the required threshold of 68 points, and the project is therefore, eligible for consider- ation by the.Planring Commission. she c mceptuai grading plan (Exhibit "C "), for the tentative map has also been reviewed by the Grading Committee, and received approval in concept only. ANALYSIS: The tract map, as shown or. Exhibit "G ", has been prepared in accordance with the State Subdivision Ma{ Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance. All structures have been sited in accordance with the code setback requirements. Access to the tract is being provided by a new street from Church Street that will link. -up with the existing southerly extension of Teat. Way. Thus providing two means of access. The proposed street system has been designed to accommodate future subdivision of that portion of the site co�.taining the existing single family residences as shown in Exhibit "E ". The development is proposing construction of a slumpstone wall, with redwood panel inserts, an alluvial r)ck parkway and street trees along Church Street from the easterly boundary -.o the proposed street into the project (Exhibit "D"). This landscaping would become part of a City land- scape maintenance district. It is also recommended that landscaping and fencing be provided , and included in the maintenance district on the east street side of Lot 8. ITEM F TT 10'316 Staff Report i4l March 11, 1981 The Design Review Committee was not satisfied with the location of the driveway and garage on Lot 9, and recommended that the driveway and garage be relocated to front on Yew Street. Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed P• *.rt II of the Initial Study and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion of the Initial Study, no significant adverse im;dcts were found as a result of this project. The issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the Coimnis- sion concurs. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was advertised in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 96 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no oral or written communication has been received regarding this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to cons'dtr public input on this project. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and condi- tions recommended by Staff, then the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions would be appropriate. ted, Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" -• Conceptual Grading Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscaping Exhibit "E" - Future Subdivision Study Exhibit "F " "I" - Elevations Part I, Initial Study Resolution of Approval Conditions of Approval n C 11 I N 1 ) "• , o,• I . I■ a-1 A C mC .' C -ayL■- rr . t■ ■■ ntl 1 Gt �= Ei i��Illli � 1 111 ■■ i>II f� a /I /II,Ci 111111 tillti ■��'■ ��t111111111111I/ � �� �� �� p ' INIIII�1111 / ' ° .r .�.■ r pC,11N111 111 = � CC .0 .0 = +.i I i r11 111111 tipl► nni ■i 1 nul fl- TR ��i i�r�U� C ► ^`�1� ■�Inll r .t.' CII■ r � 1■ ■ ■tl. ■.t , EC �� ��1,1111r.1 t T 1111 ■. 1 =ice �:`C":= ': (Item I�imiillpC■.a =. , . ;•. � ;' �':::. 1 �CE � a 1 I lu■■ ■■■■ NORTH ;✓ 77r 1031(o CITY or, ITEN I- • ter " 'R 1 PLANNING 1 AE: • r ,µ � lk r� I � t� •, •I��,I, i �I � i ti J N III ?.. i rl .•�`IiI ".1 �n,':� p it ;11 fa .ni 5>•1.�, I a�l I I I 1 1 I:I I jL ;; 7i II 1 ,—t 111•i :I _ ::.} ,x.:11. •1 ! J IY7 Ql I. • ! A Z, 4 Ire .,T'. i I- ►A -: T �1� r "I z cynr I vv31 — — - -r— — -- l l ��� • i ��.._. .t ail \� I � - I , � - • ^`���1� ; pl �: i• '�i� ,»,�I,, Nt Ii •!p 1 +.- Il it 7 .i _ ' 1 '• I _._� � 1 ��� - -- 1 ' : � `I ... _.._ _ � �� III . , Mr- _-ti^ m� III ,TJ, - 1 °• 1, �, =:;+r X1.1_} +tll �;� �? � I`'�� I�� „ I;�I� I f l 1 �\ ` �•T"• lI � 1' , � I\ f l I i � i I I I'.:' , I -�a. I !'1 III ,. •r. I .N r lil_'�,... - ^_ _I� ._�.i -_ �� IY7 Ql I. 4 O LaQ 1 i I- ►A -: T �1� r "I z cynr I vv31 — — - -r— — -- l l ��� • i ��.._. .t ail \� I � - I , � - • ^`���1� ; pl �: i• '�i� ,»,�I,, Nt Ii •!p 1 +.- Il it 7 .i _ ' 1 '• I _._� � 1 ��� - -- 1 ' : � `I ... _.._ _ � �� III . , Mr- _-ti^ m� III ,TJ, - 1 °• 1, �, =:;+r X1.1_} +tll �;� �? � I`'�� I�� „ I;�I� I f l 1 �\ ` �•T"• lI � 1' , � I\ f l I i � i I I I'.:' , I -�a. I !'1 III ,. •r. I .N r lil_'�,... - ^_ _I� ._�.i -_ �� - f `�QN � � . - �Fi tbs � — r • . Q � :_�` F. ir we* • —. t � � —L, t S rp �;; � •I �1 L �I I Ip�j� � _ AffM —T"- _ • t'YY31 .�`_ —._ ���; •:^ _ I 4ef �".. ial 'Y r. "I 0 IT, 71 ?T 4 Jj IA.W .I _1; I� � ,t�� � --.,,- III ._!�,1��Jj'1:�� � _ __ �► lid JL A VA' 7 7 _ _ f ' t I 61 IR 71 LJI X YP� I7i -71 VA J'j - if T7, eg 4,4 LI J 0 1 } I. r" Z r LN, I 3 T" < Ij S $o �x a. L n�1 A R J� ryryi I 4 1 J G 9� �O I g N b V �V �v < I. r" Z r LN, I 3 T" < Ij S $o �x a. L n�1 A R J� ryryi I 4 1 J G 9� �O I rl . '�� ' 1 'I 1 •I I� I' Oil "A.o ,l L 1. 'r I, 1 1 I I C 1 .l l 1.. l.w 1 ',lli. �.r i rf �. •. I1 I') I .: r� y I'1• 1 Ill I'l� C, f 1 �1 I v 4 l r� I j Ix Y l N r t El 11 0 E U _J H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY C� 11 PART I - PROJECT INF.'ORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental re.riew, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of.this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impart Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed pro3ec':. PROJECT TITLE: TRACT NO 10316 APPLICAITT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (714) 984 2414 Dell M_ M Daniel In .013 Begonia Avenue Ontario 97762 cn_ NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: ]Celt l MannniPl nr anry Menaniel 1013 Begonia Avenue Ontario 91762 Tel (714) 984 2414 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREW ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO -) Northeast corner Ramona Avenue and Church Street. Assessor No 208 181 06 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE. ANC FEDERAI, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: 4A -ra Fl and Contral Di ei"ri r4- Clirnmanggn•nii �r�.7 }.�- +. - x -a El IWI. 4ul [4LVJT0N, tAl� SURVEYING ® Co 674 WESI I SEREET ch'""I CAW 91762 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Constfuction of 33 Single Family ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISSTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Total Acreage 9.76 Acres'Includes lot 21 which will remain intact. Existing building x,000 So Ft +- _ DESCRIBE THE. ENVIRONMENTAL SET4NG OF THE PRdiEC'I'. SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGR2X1?Mi, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND TIIE DESCRIPTION OF AhY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Site presently a bearing citrus grove surrouriddd by eucalyptus trees serving as a wind break. Propose tract is surrounded on all sides by sing a ami y rest. ences. -rnere care no cultural historical or scenic asrrects. Existing structure on lot 21 is a single family residence — A_garage is located on the east side of lot 21. These structures are to remain. Is the project, part of a larger project, one'of a series Of cumulative actions', which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? This is a cOmlete uroiect It will not have any significant enviornmental impact. I- 2 to l40 WILL TTITS PR0Jr=: YES NO ._ x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration: _ x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 950 + - x 6. Create the need for use or dis pos-.i of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: The cxi.sting citrus trees will have to be removed The eucalyptus trees will have to be removed or topped for safety reasons. IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICINTION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above end in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and thAt t ?te facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to -the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand t'h3t additional information may be required to be submittecl before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Deve!oprv,nt Review Committee. Date t /.:2�� U Signature ignature ., %% , '2,' T--13 Title\i�c:Ac�S RESIDE ITIAL CONSTRUCTION The follo:•Ang information should be providtid to the City of Rancho :ucamonga Planning Division in order to aid i7i assessing the ability of the. school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tra7t No.: DELL M. 14CDANIEL INC TA 10316 Specific Location of Project: Noxtheast corner Church Street an3 Ramona At PHASE: I eli7• SE 2 PRASE_ 3 PHASr 4 TOTAL y. Number of single family units: 33 33 2. Number of multiple family units: 0 Date proposed to begin construction: A5 .G-a 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model 4 and ° of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Ranae 13 CZ -Y-Pe 9,-1.500 000 G Sv q (31. AM RESOLUTION NO. 'c; ,; A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10316. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10316, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Dell McDaniel, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 9.76 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Church Street and Ramona Avenue into 33 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hear•i ;tg and action on March 11, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW. THEREFORE., the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Tha Planning Commission makes the following findings Ask in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10316 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed gereral and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10316, a copy of which ie attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: 1. Installation of storm drain: on Ramona Avenue from north tract boundary to Church Street storm drain shall be required. 2. All existing easements lying within the future right - of -way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 3. All Yen °i,nEter landstapcd parkways are required to be annexed into the landscape maintenance district. 4. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed on public right -of -way on the perimeter of this tract area shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City ?nd annexed into the landscape maintenance district. 5. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any ex- isting utility facility that would affect construction. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainags entering the property from adjacent areas. 7. Additional wood trim and architectural treatment shall be provided on side street yard elevations. 8. The driveway and garage on lot 9 shall be relocated to face the north property line on Yew Street. 9. That de.ailed elevations and landscaping plans shall be submitted for fencing and planting to occur on the east side of lot 8. Said landscaping shall become part of a maintenance district. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman Resolution No. Page 3 ATTEST: Secre%.r; of the Plannirg Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the C1'Qf of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution .!�z deny and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commis ion of the City of Rancho Cuca1Wrya, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March, 1981 by the follwoin9 vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject Applicant: Location Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICAN•i SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. .2. Revised site plans ar:u building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all' sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of building Permit issuance. "004. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ o. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the. Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit_ _ 8. A sample of the roof material shall :e submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 0'*9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditloners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan sn.11 indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. _ 12. All swimming pools installed at the time cf initial development shall be solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall !)e submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid cove exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. —21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 2. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. LA _ 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. --Parking and Vehicular Access _ 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parking 'ot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. _ 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. _Oe4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. -5. All parking spaces shall be douhie striped. _ 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9 No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. ,Landscaping ZI. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. .L�2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the Proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. UJ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at.the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree- for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. Z4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided withioi the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 gallon, and 10 10-5 gallon. 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. _ 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along E D. LM I. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinancq and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such cinnc 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and appro•ras prior to issuance of Building permits. _ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required I. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Charge _ and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or re-oke the Conditional Use Permit. _ 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract on i I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is ..bject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. �6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits; when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision Aft map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. _/7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) stays prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtaineU and submitted to the City. 8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is n::` approved and retarded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development j0'0�1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this pr Ject. ,/2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. _Z3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. —4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. _ 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. r r en's' isi.. 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. ® 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code .or property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading_ 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. geological the time of application forugrading plan check. geologist check. a. _/4, The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Di- !isions and shall be completed prior to re,�rdation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichL.er comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE 141TH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: I AIV 02 Aft 47? additional feet on additional -feet on_ additional feet on C. , /3'. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. !- 4. All right of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: _ 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. _ 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation L)f any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street improvements _Z1 - Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. __112. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER WOO ® 400 ® 0010 ® doo 000 4000 - 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. Street improvement plans app - ;ved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to rec?rding of the map or the issuance of building permits: whichever comes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City p Engineer, prior to occupancy. A 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed er the requirements of the City Engineer. Y.. Drainage and Flood_ Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: _ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the N m atonel Flood Oinsurance Norogram and is subject to the provisions. of the 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect thee{� ss�tr��u��ct,u��r��es b diverting sheet runoff to street. 5. The rLn south streets shall be designed asst�Amajor water carrying street$ requiring rolled street connectionsC Uflood�prbtectionewalls,tand /or drive app landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. �. Utilities —,/I- including proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. —Z 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. ,✓ 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. --Z5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 00r& Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested opbohnap will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Requirements and Approvals 1. permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. - /3. Prior to recordation., a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and lighting "— Districts shall be filed with the City Coy r.cil. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer- -/4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. 11 13 'v J crrY OF RANca -IO cucnMa � s o - DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner By: riichael Vairin- Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRUI' +mtry Nc „����� - 81-01 - DAON - The development of a retail center on acre d in the 11 -2 zone located on the northeast corner of Haven and Arrow - APN 208 - 351 -13 ABSTRACT: The applicants have requested approval for the development of ­the phase of a two -phase retail center development on the nartheast corner of Arrow and Haven Avenue. The first phase consists Of d 73,Ou0 sq. ft. department store and a 8,000 seq. ft.pad at the corner. The project has been reviewed by the Design and Development Review Committees and has undergone many revisions per those Committee's comments. The project has betOValvareeattacheda'rareyour review and recommended conditions of app consideration. BACKGROUND: As the Commission rll recall, 1, nCMarch of 1 980othe General Plan Amendment was approved development of a commercial retail center on the northeast corner of the Haven and Arrow Route. Followir, that ene al Pland menacres� around the applicants, Daon Corporation; (iwners of project site, developed a totai master plan for t;Vedevelopment of the entire area. The conceptual master plan was app portion of first which as well as a approval for struction. rjow, the applicant is requesting the first phase development of a two -phase retail center to be locate r of Arrow corne partialnstreetnimprovements 'haveTbeen�installedswitt,y the development of the industrial portion of the plan. The site is general planned for commercial use and is presently zoned 14 -2 which permits retail centers as planned developments. For consistency purposes, Staff has recommended that a change of'zoeto C -1 be completed. The first phase of the co ercial cente i- re Pro- jected to accommodate approximately a and an 8,000 ,0 ft. Pft at thZ notfprovidednatHthis time and plans of the 8,000 sq. second ubmitted northerlyehalf of the 18 acres which is she ' ^rovalhbysthe Commissioncwillpbearequired on Precise plan review and app he osing the installation of all the second phase. The developer is prnp ITEM G CUP 31 -01 Staff Report -2 March 11, 1981 street improvements around the entice 18 acres in addition to the installation of the landscaping alw g the street frontages. ANALYSIS: The proposed use is in and purpose of both the General Plat proposed use together with the cond• be detrimental toihe public health, injurious to property improvements development will also comply v:ith a Zoning Ordinance. accordance with the objectives and the Zoning Ordinance. The tions attached herein will not safety or welfare or materially n the vicinity. The use and I applicable provisions of the The department store will °rent aic:ig haven Avenue and side on to Arrow Route. The building is placel approximately 400 feet east of Haven and approximately 1Q0 feet from Arrow Route. All loading docks and trash containers wit', be ocated to the rear of the building w.`tich is not visible from the St:ee. frontages. Access to the site will be provided by two driveways ov Haven Avenue and two driveways from Arrow Route. The location and design of the driveways meet the access policy as adoi*_ed by the Planning Commission. The project is providing appropriate interior circulation aisles and will be providing further access to an interior street of the industrial park. Parking is being provided between Haven Avenue and the store, con- sisting of 428 spaces. The Zoning 0rdinance requires 1 space for every 200 sq. ft. of ;Toss floor are ; which wnulc' require 404 parking spaces. The project is propA� sing an additiunal 24 parking stalls. The grading plan which is attached fcr your review, proposes a drainage system which basically flows to improvements along Arrow Route. This project is required to provide all on -site and off -site drainage facilixies in order to accotenodate the drainage flows that would result from this project. Attached for your review is the conceptual landscape plan which indicates the areas to be landscaped i,nd the types of material to be used. The street frontages are being landscaped in accordance with the landscape policies set by the Planning Commission, In addition, the applicant is proposing to landscape the street frontages of Phase II of the project. Landscaping along the street frontage basically consists of meandering sidewalks and r,)unded landscape areas with 2 C.U.P. Staff Report -3- March 11, 1981 various style trees. In addition, the applicant is proposing a series of tree wells throughout the parking area to soften the effect of the large parking area and to reduce solar heat gain. Landscaping is also proposed adjacent tothe building. The applicant proposes to use Magnolia Grandiflora trees adjacent to the building. Additional landscaping is being planted around the corner and side of the building. It is recommended that minimum 36" box sized trees be used along the building elevations in order to alleviate the large scale of the building at the onset. It is further recommended that the landscaping be planted in conformance with the proposal as shown on the conceptual landscape plan, including the potted plants and shrubs located in the entry way and the landscaping shown on the south elevation of the structure. A garden nursery is proposed on the south elevation of the building which is depicted to be screened with chain link fencing and a series of split -face block pilasters. It is further recommended that the screening around the nursery be planted with vines as this view is very predominant from the Arrow Route frontage. It is also recommended that the proposed building pad area for the 8,040 sq. ft building be temporarily turfed and maintained until such time that the site is built upon. The site plan indicates a 5 foot strip between the retail center and the adjacent industrial buildings but does not indicate if this area will be landscaped. It is recommended, in order to create a distinct barrier between the two p- ojects, that this 5 -foot area be landscaped along the east boundary of the project. The engine- ering plan indicates a 2 -foot wide raised median island in the central driveway off of Arrow Route. This median island should either be in- creased in size and landscaped or el?minated; as presently designed; It creates a hazard and a maintenance problem. The Design Review Committee met with the architect and developer on several occasions to discuss the design of the facility. After revisions, the design is now being presented to the Planning i:,mmission for their consideration. The Design Review Committee has recommended approval of the design ::ith one final adjustment in the plan. After the review of the latest revised plans, the Committee felt that the continuation of the beam proposed along the front of the store should continue along the front of the auto center and wrap around the south- west corner of the building. The Committee felt that the southwest corner of the building began to take on a separate appearance and design not related to the rest of the building. Because of the scale El C.U.P. 81-et Staff Report -4- March 11, 19'-' of the building, the Committee feels that the continuation of the beam around this corner will successfully reduce the overall feeling and scale of the structure. The structure is proposed to be approximately 27 feet in height. Detailed colored renderings and building elevations are available in the Planning Officeand will be on display at the Plan- ning Commission meeting for your review. The plans indicate that e.'il roof mounted equipment will be totally screened from view with u -sa of parapet walls. Since the 8,000 sq. ft. building pad design was not submitted at this time, it is required that the precise design and site plan, be returned to the Design Review Committee for their review and approval. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part I1 of the Initial Study and a field investi- gation has not found any significant adverse impacts upon the environ- ment as the result of this project. An Environmental Impact Report was completed for the master plan of the entire industrial park which gave consideration of this site as a retail center. Necessary improve- ments as described within that report are being provided in conjunction with this project relative to street improvements, street width require - riepts,and drainage facilities. Therefore, upon analysis of this phase of the project, it was found not to create any adverse impacts upon the environment and it is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was published in the Daily Report newspaper on February 27, 1981. In addition, approximately 7 certified pubic hearing notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received on the project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval recommended, then the adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. ResVrectfully/,s,Gbmitted, DrKK i- F. t7Vla ity %Planner LY BKH:MV.ps:cd Attachments 17J El i f p 11 CIF f- L - -J i f -B, Al=t L , I� I � I I I PA% $ 1 1 1 f7f r t♦ 9. IFJ 11 { 1 , ! ♦ F -------- -- 31f10tl MOgfY - - - -- ® C•ti. , l� C. • •�' • • dl n ,., De;ga;��at Store RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PARK MR., DAON /STRAND . iii '�.,. �1 I r6r%'.: } S: 1"S p, rY 1 � I� N 1 •R 1 0.X Y 4� S� �u cc A R, 'IAA �9 e1 2� 41 Qb �hy W[ M ay.asa Il A ' ZY R .b Ica h 7 1 a u D El - - - - - - - - - -- -- fill j7, -- -E-J! 11 y 4 7 1 Nz AF 4k fir ' C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY y PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $g0.•00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Pant II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Repert will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: _ K -MART DEPT. STORE - RANCHO CUCA14ONGA APPLICANT'S NAME, NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: DAON CORPORATION, 4041 MacArthur Blv d. awpor eac , 926bU (714) 2-7855 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Jack Corrigan Daon Corporation 4041 Mac Arthur Blvd. Newport Beach, CP — 7g2 -7855-5— LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) N. E. Corner Haven & Arrow LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIOIML, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES A14D THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: - g -i l FROGSSCRIPTION rt Department Store r �" �' IC-M� 551. its at�- DESCRIPTIOarkin9ROot Cad anuscaP }nq" - ad7 acent�_ - ; Ift SQUARE E70TAGE OF EXISTING PND - CT AgEA ALQD 1S acres OF PROS �Y -. ACREAGE D BUILDINGS. IF din PROPOSE J - b�l OF TH-B PRO-'E L SET�TIL =G �S (TREES) . g. },ESCgIBE E n,TION - GPP OR S ERIC ASPECT �• US THE -ice+ TOPO „T vZG IN R'� .. T._ YIISTORICAL� nESCRIPTIGI7 OFR SlIEETS) = P. 4 i ect, part u� - a3 'hOu%J d". Is the prO] which environmental of cumulative actions. a whole have signif icant � E,.�vironmental may as ro'ect. repared by PER) art of a jar er�Apri1 1980.- p The ro ect is filed. Impact Report has been �2 a WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any yES answers above: See MPp_ R_ TANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the stateme:. s tarnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my-ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand tlr•.t additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the .Development Review Committee. Date 1/9/81 f Signatuz- e'1.�ez-�,F ��,�� Jack Corrigan Titl_i?gr. of Commeroi_a_l. Develop - DAON CORPORATION ment T3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE F4NCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N.O. 81 -01 FOR DAON CORPORATION LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND ARROW IN THE M -2 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1981, a complete application was filed for review on the above - described property; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of March, 1981, the Rcncho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site for the proposed development is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect on abutting property and the permitted use thereof. ® 3. That this development will not be injurious to the health, safety, and general welfare of the cimmunity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 11, 1581. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -01 is approved subject to the fol owing conditions and attached standard conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A zone change to C -1 shall be submitted by the applicant and process-1 prior to final occupancy of the development. 2. The median island in the driveway from Arrow shall be increased to 8 feet in width and landscaped, or eliminated. 3. Vines shall be planted along the fencing around the garden center to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4. A five (5) foot landscaped planter shall be provided along the east boundary of the project between the center and the adjacent industrial development. K11 11 Resolution No. Page 2 5. The final landscape plan shall conform to the conceptual landscape plan. 6. The trees proposed along the front elevation of the building shall be an evergreen variety and shall be minimum 36" box trees when planted. In addition, a minimum of 25% of the trees to be planted throughout the development shall be specimen size trees. 7. The concept of the freestanding beam along the front elevation of the building shall be carried through in the front elevation of the auto center and wrap around the corner on the south elevation to the firct dnor. 8. The precise site plans and building designs for the corner pad are required to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and the Design Review Committee. 9. The corner building pad shall be turfed,irrigated and maintained until such time as the site is ready for construction. 10. Bicycle racks shall be provided in a safe and convenient location. 11. Shopping cart racks shall be placed in areas which do riot obstruct parking spaces or circulation aisles. ENGINEERING DIVISION 12. The proposed divider at driveway access on Arrow Route, shall be located outside the street right -of -way. 13. This project is subject to pertinent conditions of approval for Parcel Maps 6206 and 6617. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 'Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission '.V U 11 Resolution No. Page 3 Of the Manning Co�7ssion of the City of Rancho 1, JACK LAM, Secretary chat the foregoing Resolution was duly and Cucamonga, do hereby certify and adopted by the Planning Claming of introduced, passed, of the Planning vote regularly at a regular meeting 981 b the following vote to- the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of March, 1981 by Commission held on the 11th day wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i v,,- y �J Subject: APplic Locati -DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THF- FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development V* 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. V402. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of / building permits. A! 3. Approval of this request shall. not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all 'lots with adaquate sideyard area for Recreale Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. V06. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated ry the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must Le approved by the Fire Chie° and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. _ 8_- A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ✓ 9. All roof appurtenances, including air Conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and 03 sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions, �10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon all conditions of :gproval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 0 E 11 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and a Planning Division its. 5ich the shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and me hod �oT shielding. NO lighting ;hall adversely affect adjacent pro ernes. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial develop ent shall be solar heated. _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shill be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings wiin open spaces and recreational eses. _ 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all rec4oticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. _ 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted. to and approve by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. _ 16. All buildings nLmhers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. _ 17. Solid core exterior doors, sacurity dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. _ 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on ea:h unit. 39. All units within this det- elopment shall be preplumbed to be alapted for a solar water heatinc unit. _ 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are requi ed to be incorporated into this project to include such things as bu::;ot limited to reduced consumption shiwer heads, better grade of insulatiin, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. —21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to put --hase a solar water heating unit. 2?. Emergency secondary access shall he provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothi'1 Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Ma :zer Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided t Iroughout the tract in accordance twit. the Equestrian Trail Plan for. Alt ' Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum, sl hes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance wit City equestrian trait standards :hall be submitted Lo and approved y the City Planner prior to approNal and recordc: ion of the final male. _ 24. This tract shall form or ann:x to a maintenance cf equestrian trails. l maintenance 25- This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in,confos -mance with. elneral Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates„ rents and median �nccme.levels at tfie time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning•Divi; ion prior to finaliz;ng building permits and occupancy of the units. 3. Parking and Vehicular Access _Ie!:�1. All parking lot landsc- d of 4' and shall containpa 1211 walk adjacentvtoaParkingTstall. dimensior Pari;ing lot trees shali be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 2& feet wide. .i!!0'4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wade at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. _Agf�'5. All parking spaces sha"i ')e double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with adtomatic garage door openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cir iation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be develop ^d by the applicant and submitted to the City planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. l.andscap`nq _y/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to-be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. I] ♦ a ! .. a Vii, 1 :. I:\ a • y i,' •I ': �, 1 1 z L � .� 1 •.!� , Sawyj '1 ►,• } \� (� � M L I ! Y 1 I ^ '. 'a� �, %� w y, ` 1 4 p j ;l I y 11 1* .: }� A�l1 1 I / } I /�. � 1• > �! A � � •., 1 I °�: I� l lA� �! J i ., 3 I , , . a4,♦ p � 1 �`a 1 { b'j'. �,- 1. , 1 ,. Ilxl y ,! h '1 ' I'4 ;� 1 I' •, 1 it i I ` 1I�•1, 1 ♦ '1 �, !2 I� �.;; !� 7:iY�3t 'f � a :w 1 \ � ,,,n 1 �J 1. I'•I 1 �. ♦ } ��� h I,� 7 JI �pp X i`\ 1 1 l : ( • L y'I 1 7 1 i•ay \ � J sl � 1 ', .K.:� lLI{ >I W 4 � � J }i., � A r, nl r 11 ✓ l ly 1 � `L� 0'.KI ar'r 1 .,:5 Il l.'A.,iil' ,. :� •� r /�\ L 1 •1. �r a 1 ` j I Il L' 1 1' !1 1' I L I� ■ _ 3- Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decoying or potentially dangerous trees snail be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of tiie Master Plan'pf Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree -for -tree basis as provided by the' Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho ` Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _ `. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 y?llon, and 10o -5 gallon. -006. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free From weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope Planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and o- -dupied by the buyer °. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shell be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all or an slopes shail be seeded with method of erosion tcontrol ssatisfactory ptotthr 9uildidgng Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. _ 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to is of building permits. suance 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installeu by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. _ 10_ The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shalt be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. ✓`r11. A minimum of .2C%1 specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. _jg! L"'12. Special landscape features such as Mounding, alleivial rock, specimen size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along /k UG6_900_1 1�i{6�0' LtJ D. E. Signs _zi. Any signs proposed ;or this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordindncrti and shall require review and approval the e Planning Divisicn prior to installation of such signs. �. A uniform sign program for this development• shall be submitted to Vie Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. . The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. Additional Approvals Required I. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit _ 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s! at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract on ' I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand t at.said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to"gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. _ 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School -Districts, shall - be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of acconnodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 0 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities -are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60-) days prior to final map approval "in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted 'to the City. 8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (I2) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by she Planning Commission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management. Ordinance prior to final approval and reccrdation of the map if the subdivision is -going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. -jeffS Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. _ 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. JiL*4�4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. _ b. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. _ 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. Y' r' 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material . and non- cor.bustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. - G. Existinq 5 tructures _ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. _ 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zcn�ng regulations for the intended use or the building shall ba demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code_ H. Grading _3e 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. _jen• A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engiaear licensed by the State of California to perform such work. _ 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. _Z'4 _ The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WM .THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: '- I. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. ` 2. Dedication shall be made of ti following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 1 J. El _ 3. Corner property line radius will be required 4. All rights of-vehicular ingress to and egress foll.ws: per City standards. from shall-be dedicated as J/ 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over _` private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property ur in the operation of the proposed business. Street Improvements Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. - 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited tn- STREET NAME CURE & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS t E OT ER I-C-RUQIA Vol' V" 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment Permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior tc recording of the map or the issuance of- building Permits, whichever comes first. Z6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. i;/ 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic an`d street name signing shall be installed Per the requirements of the City Engineer. I. K. Drainage and Flood Control The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite 'drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2.. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the (National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions 'of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sreet runoff to street. 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. I. • Utilities _7/ 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major ;c- terials less than 12 KV. 2. Utility easements shail be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. ✓ 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. _ 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of •treet lighting'•in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer systc -m plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6:- Approvals have not been secures from all utiliti =s and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map wild be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Reouirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agenc;c> will be required as follows: A. Caltrahs for: Z8. County Dust Abatement krequired prior to issuance of a grading permi® C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: y 1 �. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCP,R's) and Articles of Incorporation, of the Hcmeowners Association, subject to the approval of the C'ty Attorney, sha ?I :;e racordcad with this map and a copy providea to the pity., _ A. Prior to recordation, a Notice sf rotintion to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the "ity Council._ The ;ngineering costs involved in Districts Forrs:rion s"haa) ce borne by tFe developer. _ 4. - Final parcel and tract m',)z shall conform to City standards and proeeMure KII , t 1 1; .,, �r� ..i ; f/ �y ..,�. 1 , �'1 1 � ••1 w 1 ;j 1.. �i'I 1 '.'L,n 1 1. 1 1 ,,' � �„ I it ,� �1•. II' 1 I I 11.. ''1 I I- i L� '' r.. 1 • •r . 1 1 51 ?. 1 1 (1 '. I r � �,• 1 ' y 1 11` 1� 1 5 � 1 � I: I 11� l' � \ I �y +� ! !I � �! 5 � �, I � � �f . 'i /4o-, , t' 1 .r •_ / I,.. J '•) Ir v , 1'� 1 � 1 • � 5 1 1. '1•. ly::l 1 rl�.t4;. i• 1 I S � , \r1 1 _P•1; 11 1'. � 1 I Ill • ;i ,J �� x•11 rrl .•. # t 1' I F j •l" 1! IIYI I � \ e is 1 I� 1, l ,J rrl .•. '`- 1' I F j II'.I J,. III 1! IIYI ` ' � is CITY OF RANCI -D Cl3CAMONGA �C STAFIF REPORT rz _ 0 DATE: March 11, 1981 U 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11606 WESTEND - A residential subdivision on 70.32 acres of rai nto 277 single family residential lots in the R -1 zone, located on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way between Haven Avenue ar," Deer Creek - APN 207 - 221 -18 ABSTRACT: Che applicants have submitted a residential custom lot /tract subdivision application in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance. The Growth Management Review Committee, has reviewed the proposed deve op- ment; the project received the minimum necessary points to be consiaered for approval by the Planning Commission under the Growth Manawtwevt system. Therefore, Staff has prepared conditions of approval for the Commission's consideration and has provided them for your review. BACKGROUND: The applicants are requesting review and approval for the development of 277 lot single family residential subdivision on approxi- maiely 70 acres of land located on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way dnd between Haven Avenue and Deer Creek (Eriribit A). This application has been submitted as a custonrlot /tract subdivision and has therefore, not submitted precise dwelling unit locations or designs. Should the applicant decide to develop this as a tract, thec precise designs would be required to be reviewed and approved by the "esign Review Committee and the Planning Commission. The project as r oposed indicates variable lot sizes ranging in size from 6,300 sq. Ft up to as large as 16,000 sq. ft. Under the provisions of the new Zoning Ordinance, variable lot sizes are permitted in the R -1 district with a maximum of 250 of the lots permitted to be less than the minimum 7,200 sq. ft. This development proposes only 39 lots to be lass tha:, the 7,200 sq. ft which is 14% of the total lots within the development. The site is presently zoned R -1 and is General Planned for Low Density Residential at 2 -4 dwelling units per acre on both the Interim and Proposed General Plans. The project as presently designed will be or-viding 3..:= units per acre. The site is presently undeveloped and vacant and is bounded on the east by Deer Creek and on the south by the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way. Housing developments to the west are either existing or are under construction. The project has been reviewed by the Growth Management, Review Committee and has bren assessed a total of 47.6 points under the Residential Assess- ment System., thus exceeding the threshold point limit and can be considered ` by the Planning Commission fnr approval. ITEM H TT 11606 Staff Report ANALYSIS: The project as been prepared in accordance Subdivision Ordinance, and -2- March 11, 1981 shown on Exhibit B; the tract map, has with the State Subdivision Map Act, the City the City's Zoning Ordinance. The developer intends to develop the project in several phases. Phase I is to occur at the southeast corner of the Ne .jject site a.r.3 the remaining phases going northward. Access to the project will be provided from three existing stebbed streets from the east and one street to the north of 19th Street. Victoria Street is a 66 ft. right -of -way and has direct access to Haven Avenue. The street to the north will have direct access to 19th Street. All interior streets are being 6esigned and improved ire accor- dance with the City Engineering Standards. It is recommended thhat a pedestrian pathway be provided through lots 108 -109, 190 and 211 between the two side -on cul -de -sacs. No exterior or perimeter parkways will be created as a result of this development. No walls are presently proposes by the developer on any portion of the project site. However, there is a need for a noise attenuation wall along tie southern boundary of the project adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way. The wall should be placed at the top of the slope along the property line and the height should be equal to the height of the eave of the structures so that noise may be effectively attenuated. No two -story structures will be permitted on the lots along this boundary. A regional equestrian trail is proposed along Deer Creek and it is recommended that the applicant install or bond for the installation for the development of that portion of the trail which immediately boarders the project boundaries. In addition, it is recommended that two points of pedestrian access from the tract to the trail be provided. It should be n v;inimum 10 -ft. wide concrete pathway separated from lots with walls and landscap ag. A street light shall -Also be provided in the pathway., Part I of the Initial Study as p °epared by the applicant is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has prepares; Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation and has not found any significant adverse =mpacts on the environment as a result of this project. There- fore, is, Jance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPOPI)ENCE: A public hearing notice was published in the Daily Report newspaper on Feb. 27, 1981. In addition, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries. To date, no correspondence has been received on this project. 'a ll El LJ it i10U7 Staff Report '3- March 11, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pubic hearing to consider p•iblic input and elements of this project. If, after such consideraticn, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval as recommended, then the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions would be appropriate. , a r n :111V :" Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map and Conceptual Grading Plan Initial Study - Part I Resolution of Approval r 9 1_ ,i 1y 1 .1 1 1 ,.4 II 1� r�.1s , l: . < 1 r p >. , 9 1_ ,i 1y 1 .1 1 1 ,.4 II 1� r�.1s , l: . r p >. V, 'I 9 1_ ,i 1y 1 .1 1 1 ,.4 II 1� r�.1s , l: . IY Vll.r - I"AiNG ` 4N ':- J I a N�� l' •� a 6 -T -- ; yy ✓ .. 'L j Dl'�S 'L' N3 Ii QWhLQ__ li -r +.n.0 :rt luvr ►, f1IR ♦ � ryry / � "Y � , Gg9LW- MP /n - 1I„ %✓^i i!'���Y: n:Mlr ewe r w 7� � � IOl(Y< YCILW GO' A' r*7AI I1 « lIIf'CIL S[C1�ON /O—N Rc•!�W dSliIIX.y M'TEA /OR STREET r tale.., teetMo �r NwI FYI M� n� yhlf.�r IN(' AQLC �q •� •Y,//Nf'R�IM1>•'O QGMbY@MY. IM *�'i._ .- 4.�� --' I w.rnrow w,lq'w wIN. IIW lWnIlnwllr.¢ .KIURw«w f1flsY cwt tiNp/' o�ilrMS/INIOw >oe6 mwm.wn�r ,eNluR w.ro erAi .•NmrNrownrt rt•.l. -r. ^. ^•�, I• <. ¢fd/rw i�'�elN.aid_ �_N rYf•OYI .._ \r.ry �.— � �. ` --� /'. Ii'rolY�� �/i I li -r +.n.0 :rt luvr ►, f1IR ♦ � ryry / � "Y � , Gg9LW- MP /n - 1I„ %✓^i i!'���Y: n:Mlr ewe r w 7� � � IOl(Y< YCILW GO' A' r*7AI I1 « lIIf'CIL S[C1�ON /O—N Rc•!�W dSliIIX.y M'TEA /OR STREET r tale.., teetMo �r NwI FYI M� n� yhlf.�r IN(' AQLC CITY OF RO.GCHO CGCAMONGA INIT':AL STUDY PAKP I - PROJECT INFOP14ATION S 3EET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $60.00 For all projects reatiring environmental review, this forna must be completed ana submitted to the Develop. tent Review Committee thrr.ugh the department where the project application :.s made. Upon receipt of this application, the Env :.ronmen'al Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial. Study. The Development Revier con^:ittee will meet : tnd take action no later than 1 en ;L0) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be head. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no envirorm.,?ntal impact and a Negative Declaration wi:1 be filed, 2) The projec+: will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be preparec, or 3) An additional information report should be supp'_ied by the applicant g.`*M ng further information concerning the proposed project.- PROJECT TITLE: West End Investments ` APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: West End 7nv.sb rants 7333 Helmn Avenue, Ranchc Cucamonpa.t CA 91730 (714) 989 -17 ;7 VAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: D Gorpm 7333 Eelman Avenue, Pancho Cucamonpn. CA 91747 (714) LOCATION OF PROJECT ( STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PP q. CEL NOS - ) 11000 Victoria Street RPN 207--221-18 I LIST OTHER PERMITS NECLSSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TLE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Easement from San 13ernar t tCq=y Flood Control (Dpe_r• Creek 'mannel ) • _ Y. -f I 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION D S le family resi.3entia.l comprising 275 lofs R.IPTION OF PROJECT: ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: '10 Acres, proposed buildinms ure custom; site is presently vacant DESCRIBE THE ENVIROIIENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SU•:RROT;NDING PROPERTIES,. AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): residential; to the North is undevelo ed residential -ordriq; to the South an or the Sout aci . c al.Lroaa. The ti ;L�cts "are In Oe; to er imeex MEMEL WracH is prosentlT an urmVroved Channel. course . me area pro ertl . an e cons s s Of s s, o d. grape vines an grasses. W are common rodents, reptiles and birds. Is the project, part of a larger project, one cf a series - of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental a.mpact? NO 1 l WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X, Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration: X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5= Remove any existing trees? Flow many? Y_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted be ore an adequate evaulation can be made by the .Deve Review Committee. /7 v Date ('7 ` Gc� — (.�(� Signature /�Ij,, Title ' %3 A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject Appl icant:_Warm Location: Those stems checked are conditions of APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE UITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. _ 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. —Z3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect —at time of Building Permit issuance. --v—/4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Ferreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. li 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for-- review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. g. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be ar:hitecturally -- integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thireon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfactior, of the Director of Community Development. Ell I _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adja cent 'properties. _ 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development' SiCd l be solar heated. _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings witPi open spaces and recreational uses. _ 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building official prior +n occupancy of the first unit. _ 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner., including proper illumination. V00�17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. _ 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. _ 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be Jncorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double Paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. _ 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating mpit. _Ae!!O'2"'2. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, phys -ical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards, .shalI be-submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian. trails. E 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision - shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. _ is. Parking at.d Vehicular Access _ 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. _ 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. Ali two -way aisle :•:idths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. _ 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. _ 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R. 's shall be developed by the applicant and suhmiti:ed to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping _ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Existiag trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan cf existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be- completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account "the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. _ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree -for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 7.0' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. _ 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, :`ree from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscap -ed and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of.Rancho Cucamonga. Such.slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation sha-�l be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to relea zing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building -Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. —8- All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City, Such proof of maintenance -shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. _ 10. Tha final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be "Subject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of within the project, specimen size trees shall be planted _ 12. Special landscape features ::uch as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along D. Signs 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign OrdinancP, and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the - Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conritions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. _ 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by .purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which state:; that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accomnodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer an.7 water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in VW the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in t„e case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the San a Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supiortive information, shail be obtained and submitted to the City. - _Z8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval. of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. Z9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TEE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and* all other applicable cedes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. _Z2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted *o the Foothill. District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protectiun is available. _4Z3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Prier to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition t9 an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the et'ablished rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5 a This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building Plevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding rr plan• -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances ' considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings, _ 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for t{.e intended use or the building shall be demolished. _ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H_ Grading �1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices_ The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the - approved conceptual grading plan. �2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer- licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. _IZ4. The final grading plan shall he subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering_and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR CONPLIANC.• 141TH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: �y �L addi tional feet on *Pz � 9W% � rf i 7 :? ?. k- additional feet on dddiLiundi ieei uri i= -.%Z 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows:- . 5. Re_iprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels ever private roads, drives, or parking areas. o. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements W000,1. Construct full street improvements. including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, siderjaik, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER . ✓ 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment perwit. 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Citf7 -Attorney`, guaranteeing completion of the public` improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of buildinq permits, whichever comes first. ✓_ 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 1 s�r 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. • K. Drainage and Flood Control s_ 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: Z/ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the NaGionai Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions •of the program ana City Ordinance No. 24. a✓ 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. _ 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection wails, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities - 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. — t/' 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving is utility companies and the City Engineer. A/ 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as.required. - �✓ 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD),-Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. w/ 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other tnterested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be Eeceived from them. M. General Reouireme +✓�1. Permits A. _*_/C. is d D. its and Approvals from other agencies will be required as follows: Caltrans for: - County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading perm-,t) San Bernardino County Fl_-aad Control District Other: ��PJ�r���?� pr► '3�QCa�it����a �i"O' 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &2's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject t;, the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. _ 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting D-istricts shail be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs im olved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. E 11 LI lu CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA ST'S R1.PORT DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: 'Planning Commissior•. FROM: �.,yd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map No. 6.60 - Weaver A residentia su w;s'�on or 16.4 acres into 3 parcels within the R -I -20 zone located on the east side of Carnelian, north of Hillside - APN 1061- c6l -01 INTRODUCTION: s proposed subdivision will provide a mans for the owners to build a house on Parcel 2 and sell Parcel 3 for the keeping of horses. There is a potential for future subdivision of any or all of the parcels into 1 t lthou h the owner has no plans for such action. 1/2 acre o s, a g If any significant building is done on any of the parcels, there would be the necessity for extensive drainage improvements on and off-of the property. The proposed conditions of approval' for the map provide for such improvements at the time of development. The minimal uses proposed should not.occur until the adequacy of the existing drainage courses is determined nor until the impact of increased runoff on the downstream properties has been assessed. City Engineer's Report conditions No. 1, 9, 32 and 33 are intended to cover these concerns. Until further development is proposed, a public street as shown on the tenta- tive map will provide the required access to ali parcels. No public access other than from Carnelian Street is ever likely to occur. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of t e nitial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environ- ment as a result of the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended to the City Engineer's Report, an d resolution is attached to provide Respectfully {�submitted, _ LBH:PAR:jaa Attachments that the tentative map be approved, subject that a Negative Declaration be issued. A for approval should the Commission concur. Item I b. TENrATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6260 ijLlfVR'�flL MOiRO \. TM YNI N.wRnJr�W 4DDNYI.W�IR.�Yw�. R, iM w+.Y1+1�D.•.1RFYN wqY I.1 RB.iY. D. ri wt��YR •Ylgl Y ••I.DR•RN• �. TM NMIYYIYY Dn• r.ww 411Rw.4 tilt . DIIw4N R•W.w G111MW ON �0.� 4«w1 T�4WY •TNryI� C�wrgD 4. DhIN U4.M�1 . wow Mw4 4P4 iNb • Dwq� D. iM wMYY Y�R+R�Y Ow�.RY w��IO�Ww�vINN M R. pa.f.R DtiaYM M• DND w iYYDRin" DM w. w M. ODlA to • Q iMDO VgRY Rf� 91M tANDM RK saNSULTAWS F3 _J 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCHGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Landmark. Consultants _ TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6260 _ LOCATION: EIS of Carnelian St., north of Hillside Rd. DATE FILED: 7/25/80 _ NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 _ LEGAL ''ESCRIPTION: _ RECEIPT NUMBER: 07968 _ FEE: $220.00 - ZONE: R -1 _ www+rwa•wwww ww ww,kw•kw,rw *ww•ws * * +•www wi *w•ww•kw *www k TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Landmark Consultants , — GROSS ACREAGE: 18.2 _ ADDRESS: 201 N. 1st Ave., Suite 100 _ MINIMUM LOT AREA: 20,000 Upland, CA 91788 — MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 80 ww a =wwww,rwww *w•w,t *www wwwwn,t *,rww * *wt *•ww *w * *w* a RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE # Louise Weaver 9683 San Bernardino Rd. 987 -2673 RCE 20 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications X 1. X 2. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights =of -way and all necessi easements as shown on the tentative map, or as required by tha City Engineer; Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following "y streets: 20 additional feet on iiew east -wort street _ additional feet on additional feet on Corner P/L radius required on _ Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be invited as follows: 4. 5. 6. Street vacation required for: tiaster Plan of Stree�:: revision required for: The following perimeter 'ntersections reg4ire realignment as fol ows: L L RCE 20 I TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6260 Page 2 movements (Bonding is required prior to 13 Recording for _) ®(Building permit forea— ch parcel, ) except—as—noted X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. X _ 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *includ . nq landscaping and irrigation on meter STREET NAME ;CURB & GJTTER A.C. PVMT. IDE- MALI: DRIVE APPR. STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND* OTHER Carnelian X X Y X �- tFe a iLnpvovemen s re ui ed for Farcel 1 nl ) X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. _ 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas; telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. _= 11., Developer shall coordinate. and where necessary, pay for the relocation of riy power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. Y. 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Sdcn plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X -14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County-Water District standards. 4 letter of acceptance is required. X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A. C. overt ay:_ 17, n� e follow i g specific dimensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are net approved: ` 18. Me-ToTiowing existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other ties involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to that may be received from them. RCE 20 from CALTRANS/ interested agen- any requi; ements TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6260 is X . 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: _ B. City: _ C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep: X E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control Page 3 _ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: X 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. _ 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located_ 26. The boundary of the Tentative Flap needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shat T be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. ® Parcel Map Waiver _ 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for _) ® Building permit for earcel ) ach p X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision w-'ll be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. _ 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. _ 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. X _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ at proposed street crossings of existing natural channels. X 33. Broad scale hydrolcyic studies will Be require to assess *impact ot increased runoff and to make a determination of the hydraulic structures necessary at the Aft proposed street crossings of the existing natural channels. Also necessary will be an assessment of the erosion problem on properties at the southeast corner of the subject property. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP No. 6263 Miscellaneous Page 4 [ _ 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. —36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City BLUnda.ry and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be showr on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. Proper grading and erosion contrrof, inclu- the preventation of sedimenra- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X_ 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. _ 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final snap unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X _ 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. —44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple tots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. _2L_ 45. Prior to recordation surety shall be posted for the construction of a 26' width of asphalt pavement along the length of the proposed new street. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HIJBBS CITY ENGINEER �PCE 20 NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 6260' WHEREAS, on July 25, 1980, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subnivioi:.: is consistent with the proposed General Plat.- 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed develops.. nt. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial envirorrner:tal damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on March 11, '981. Sb-'TION 3: That Tentative Parcel. Map No. 6260 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING CO14KISSI0N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dzhl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, J.:.CK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March, 1981, by the following vote to wit: Resolution Page 2 No. Ilk X, 4 • t t NOES: • I • •�' I COMMISSIONERS: �1 1,. 1" 1� 1 4� r i` � � 1 +1 4. II II t( II ` a ..l El C CITY OF ,RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY . PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of .this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three d &-terYfiinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Parcel Map 6260 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Louise Weaver 9683 San Bernardino Rd. Cucamonea, Ca. 91730 71.4- 987 -2673 r NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Landmark Consultants 902 W. 9th St, Upland, Ca. 91786 714 - 981 -5602 i LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET, ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR ..•iRCEL NO.) Assessor 'Parcel No. 1061 - 261 -01 _ 5300 Block Carnelian Ave. FIST OTHER PERDIITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE. AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUI14G SUCH PERMITS: None 1 -O PROJECT DESCRIPTION , DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Parcel Nlap 6260 _ 3 lot Parcel f=lap —� ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PPWPOSED BUILDING'S, I£ ANY: 18.1 acres (approx) DESCRIBE THE-ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEI•IIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The general elope of the proper_t.Lia_to the sout'n at 8 percent Thc• site is traversed by two natural drainage courses of approximately cnree separate areas. 'lne center area contains a peach orchard whim The surrounding land use is' residential and vacant property. The only structure on the site is a shed in the southwest corner of the property near Carnf Han Ave. and is used for storage. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No I- 2 'Ell J WILL. TI MS P11O.TI CT- YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration! _ 3. Create a substantial cha- -93 in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5- Remove any existing trees! How many? _. X 6. Create the need for use.or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flam:nables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: If the project involves the construction of IMPORTANT' residential units, complete the form on the next page. I hereby certify that the statements furnished Cr RTIFICATION: exhibits present the data and above and in the attached for finis initial evaluation to the information required and that the facts, statements, and best of my ability, information presented are rue and correct to the best of t —understand—that my knowledge and belie`_.' I further be to be yLibmitted tte additional information may required Amen[ be made by before an adequate evallation can Review Committee. a — $ p Signature `�. 14' r Date Title ;;:,.. T-- 3 0 A C crry OF RANUiO CUCAMONGA o 0"2424 STAFF REPORT <� LL Q } F U DATE: March 11, 1981 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 6724 - Davis Development An industria. subdivision of 5,44 acres into 8 parcels within a 14 -R zone located on the north side of 7th_ Street, east side of Hellman Avenue The developer has not yet submitted a conceptual site plan fnr this parcel map, therefore, It is recommended that the Public Hearing be continued until March 25, 1981. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Item J CrrY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA. SrAFF REPORT DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Parcel Ma 67 subdivision of .0 acres ronto 8 parcels the C -2 zone 1977 - Urban /Ouong- Watkins r commercial use in INTRODUCTION: This subdivision will provide a Neighborhood Shopping Center at t e port east corner of Archibald and Foothill. This project is to be .?viewed by the Planning Commission in the near future and the developer It. :submitted development plans for review by the Design Review Committee (C.u.P. 81 -03). The property is bounded on the north by Central Elemen'_ary School, on the east by a single family development wsth commercial building on Foothill; on the south and west by commercial development. The entire project area is zoned and planned for comrcarical use. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial-Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environ- ment as a result of the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map l-? approved, subject to tie rot Ey ngineer's Report, and that a Negative Declara: on be issued. A resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. 4Respectfully suubbmiittteedd. vle��� "- "d�'7 LBH:BK:jaa Attachments Item K RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6726 WHEREAS, on February 26, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 1961, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the at.uve described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental 4amage, public health problems or have adverse r_ffects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on March 11, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6726 ?s approved sutiect to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report rw�rtaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM014GA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March, 1981, by the following vote to wit: } Resolution No. Page 2 i AYES: C2-MMISSIONERS: ,. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: t. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r; i } CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Urban /Ouong- Watkins Commercial Properties TENTATIVE MAP NO LOCATION: NEC Archibald and Foothill DATE FILED: 2/6/81 6726 NUMBER OF LOTS - 8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of RECEIPT NUMBER: 1/4 of section 2, TIS, R7W FEE: $250.00 ZONE: C -2 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Lockman & Associates GROSS ACREAGE: ADDRESS: 249 East Pomona £lvd. MINIMUM LOT AREA: Monterey Park, CA 91754 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE # Urban /Ouong- Watkins 1914 Orangewood Ave., Suite 102 978 -9377 Commercial Properties Orange, CA 92668 11 REPORT OF THE CITY -ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 5 additional feet on Archibald Ave. 10 additional feet on--Toot hill v . additional feet on 24' Corner P/L radius required on Arch i ba oo i I I Blvd. Other X 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: one drive approach on Foothill, two drive approaches on Archibald. 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision require' — 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6726 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to 0 Recording for- ) %'Building permit for a.i parce s ) 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach pe- lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. X 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the follow +ng streets: *inr_ludina landscapina and irrigation on meter STREET NAME CURB & GJTTER A.C. PVMT. IDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS ME'1IAN ISLAND* OTHER Foothill X X X X X X_ Archibald X X X X * curb return All existin dri ewa a roache on A chibal Ave. s all be le placed ith curb and utter. *Lien aareement for landscaping median island on Foothill Blvd. and median island to be constructed on Archibald. X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable teievision.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. ® X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sever and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District. standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X _ 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The following specific dimensions, i.e., cu -de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: _ 18. T he following existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees X 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may b2 received from them. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAI NO. 6726 ;Page 3 X 21. Permits from othew- agencies will a required as follows: A. Caltrans, for: Foothill X B. City: Architald _ C. County Dust atement D :riot: D. D.I.S. Trenc!:ing Permit i7 any trenches are over 5 deep:_ —_ E. CucF.monga County Water District: F. Other: - Map Control 22. If only a portion of tris Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made :o pro- vide for two -way traffic and parsing on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear io be ubstandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on tre f nal map: _ 24. All corner lots shall have a eerier radius at the right -o -way ine 1 accord, ance with the City of Rancho Cuc ,m. nga standards. _ 25. A Parcel M,.p shad be recorded p 1 or to the first phase subdivision t► prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentativ e P•1a -1—ne-e-K clarification as follows: _ 27. The border shall be shown to cem erline (if existing perimeter streets or title explanation required. Parcel Map Waiver _ 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not su ficient to support the issuance of a waivar of Parcel Map Certificate, accord ng to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bunding is required prior to O Recording for ) XM Building permit for j X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to Flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision wil 'be subject to the provisions of that )rogram and Ordinance No. 24. Zone RCE 20 A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire nort 'pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to r1treets. &-h flow may be required to co under sidewalks through culverts If water surface is above top of c:rb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locat pns:_ Broad scale hydrologic studies will a require to assess impac u aitreased runoff. i Construct all drainage id rovements as required at time of issuance of building permit. I 30 31 _ 32 _ 33 X 34 RCE 20 A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire nort 'pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to r1treets. &-h flow may be required to co under sidewalks through culverts If water surface is above top of c:rb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locat pns:_ Broad scale hydrologic studies will a require to assess impac u aitreased runoff. i Construct all drainage id rovements as required at time of issuance of building permit. I TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6726 Page 4 Miscellaneous_ X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. X 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Flannirg Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation.. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. Proper grading erosion control, including the preventation of sed7menta - -' tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils rep ,)rt will not be required for this site for.the follow- - ing reasons: A cony of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prier to grading will bs! furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The. filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be al.ked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section Ci6436(C)(l) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise _ of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said decermina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At *he time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Reciprocal access easement ensuring access to all parcels ovEr private roads, drives or parking areas and blanket drainage easements across all parcels shall be recorded concurrent with the recordation of the Parcel Map. _ 46. All existing buildings crossing parcel lines shall be demolished prior to map recordation. _ x 47. All traffic signal equipment that will be affected by the improvements shall be relocated to the satisfac: ion of CALTRANS. tq� RCE 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $60.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of- the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet •ard take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard_ The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The projt��ct will have no environmental impact.and a Negative Declaration will be filed, ?) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving fv-t ?,er information concerning the proposed project. 0 PROJECT TITLE: Commercial Shopping Center APPLICANT'S NArIE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Barry Watkins, Quong- Watkins Properties; 1914 Orangewood Avenue, bui e Lvzt orange California, 92668 (714) 978•-9377 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Barry Watkins - 'Same as above address (714) 978 -9377 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.), NEC FoothX11 and Archibald - AP# Boo-K -10770 Page 641, parcels 54, 551 56, , , , • , an LIST 'OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERM�T•$- Approval from ral Trans for driveway =uts on Foo iil Blvd. _ T_1 Y ' PROJECT DESCRIPfION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT., Neighborhood shopping center to replace old deteriorated commercial buildings ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY= Acerage Existing buildings 26,600 0 Proposed building :, DESCRIBE THE ENVIRCNMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (2.° -TACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The topography is gently sloping in a Scutherly. direction. Very little plants, trees or shrubs presently exist nor are 'there any animals, or cultural or historical aspects ot the - site. The site is presently located at the gateway to the - City and is grite an eyesore. The property is presently bei..:q used for several unrelated commercial uses, such as, an insurance agency, a livestock feed store, a hardware store, furniture store, antique store, ower shop and a bar. is the project, part of a larger projecf-, one of a series- o-_7 c•imulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? The project is complete a:.d not part of a larger project featuring a redesign of the entire property. I- 2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. .Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a. substantial change in existing noise or vibration: x_ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc_;: X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 11 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTAIu: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I ?hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct t., the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand tla t additional informa .ion vay be required to be submitted before an adequate evallation can be made by the .Development Review Committee. Date �Ci/ Signature ,_ Title �' Le • Z -'3 IC: r L 4 .r r 0; Ell 0 0111 iM ' 1i3 l fi Y . � e i - i j•- T J .1 .. , 11 C 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT < 0 DATE: March 11, 1981 01__ 1977 TO Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BV: Dan Coleman, Assistant ann C . SUBJECT: DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 81 -OB - C/L BUILDERS - The development of an 8,249 sq. ft. restaurant on a 0.99 acre parcel in "The Exchange" professional office center in the C -1 zone, located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue - APN 207- 031 -29 RELATED FILES: Director Review No. 79 -15 BACKGROUND: In March of 1979, the Planning Commission approved the evelopment of an office center on the southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian Avenue, and granted conceptual approval for a restaurant pad (Exhibit "B "). The applicant is now requesting review and approval for the architectural design of an 8,249 sq. ft. restaurant as shown in Exhibit "C ". As indicated on the elevations shown on Exhibits "0" and "E ", the proposed design thane incorporates a New Orleans architectural style, which includes shiplap siding, decorative trim, metal roofing with battens, brick veneer, and applied plaster, and woodsash windows with canvas awnings. The metal roof material -is identical to that used in the office center. The proposed design is in accordance with adopted City standards, policies, and ordinances and provides a compatible building design to the existing office complex. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the development plans and recommends approval after viewing and discarding a version of the elevations with barrel tile. The expansion of the restaurant pad necessitated a modification to the parking lot design. The new parking arrangement provides parking in conformance with Ordinance requirements; however, there is not enough available parking to support the second restaurant pad on the Carnelian side of the office center. The illustrative site plan, as shown in Exhibit "C ", indicates the exclusive use of speci- men size trees, and an appropriate condition has been attached to require the detailed landscape and irrigation plaq to conform with the illustrative site plan. There are no Engineering Division conditions of approval be- cause the site is fully improved. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended muted, and a Resolution of Approval for your review and consideration. BKH:DC:cd Attachments. that the project be approved as sub - with attached conditions is supplied ITEM L I � ,l 1 ,r '1• �j == inun/.�un ■/n N // um / u .. ■ nm �.,ry � u Yi/r uu■ r iii sl r� r�oi1�a /� / /��0� lu • ' •�.. \`��s..�.��a� nnnrt unn►�� Sul /r -+• ' 1,: � ' � .■ iii it it ; r o nr,� .,, . T' E.....�._ ...�.. 11 1� 111110 .�:: � • , 1 ' f,4I�;�Rr . ,1 �.Z:. ■ 1111 � � � ■:� ' �� r�■rfr , s � i i. G /���rf � ,, . 111 . NUITH 1 ■� s. ...��n nil uu ! ' ,�! rid .� i� ■� ■ .. 1 e PLANNING DIVU)NI is i� } /1 +r' �r r a rr r r" ?r 0 I NORTH PLANN(N , M'ISKON EX! !!!3!•i•= r. r �Om • 1� �a� 'Y��•V�MrV �` • IiMY" � _ w ) { y r wAr^•�• i � .' x\11. �\.. • _ \ .IIIx . / � I Y•� • ••. /�� • /. ', J✓ w/rrw.,. \1.11' ..� •..� 1'�::I 'il14�1 q•r..l�w� +• LANDSCAPE eeGEM NORTH CI ry ol. ITEM: RANCID CLUNNION IA Trrta PLANNING DIVISION LX111 r li C�_ �• +1 ' • 1 W n �t t r e c irry of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING UIVISK N F I. I1T, 4M n �Vi' 9 -OS / EXI 11131 -r- y "1 3 - - �1 b I ILLS �t CITY OF It CTOk IME-!J s1- E" RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION es1 m;ir =�- SCALE. r,�s, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -08 LOCATED ON THE SnUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND CARNELIAN. WHEREAS, on the 6th day n" February, 1981, a cimpiete application was filed for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTIOO 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site indicated by the development plan is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, landscaping, loading, and other features required by this section. 2. That the improvements as indicated on the development plan are located in such a manner as to be properly related to existing and proposed streets and highways. 3. That the improvements as shown on the develor -nent plan are consistent with all ar;pted stacdards and policies as set forth in this section. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the enviro mmm� i and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 11, 1951. SECTION 3: That Director Review No. 81 -08 is approved subject to the fol owing conditions and attached standard conditions: 1. That the detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall conform to the conceptual landscaping as shown on the illustrative site plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dah hairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby .• certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and AOL regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L LJ ® Subject: Applican Locatior DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Those items checked are zonditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development _ZI. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plan_ on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. Z. Resised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive com?liance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. Z6. Trash receptacle zreas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry Nall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the. Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. B. A sample of the roof material siiall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. —Zg. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the _ Planning Division prior to issuan:e of building permits. Such plan j shall indicate style, illuminatioi, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall advarsely affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall _ be solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for iiedividual units with all lrecepticals _ kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard ,patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the . _ City Planner and Building Officirl prior to occupancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and indivilual units shall be iderstified in a _ clear and concise manner, inclucing proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be _ installed on each unit in this T.roject. _ 18. Security devices such as windo.: l)ci:s shall be installed on each unit 19. All units within this developmen: shall be preplumbed to ba adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy cen;erving building mater als and appliances are required to I? incorporated into this project tc include such things as but not lim-ted to reduced consumption shower heeds, better grade of insulation, dou;le paned windows, extended overhang <_, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase if: _ solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall )e provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned tg1iestrizn Trails shall be provided through( It the tract in accordance with i�,- Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma.; A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with pity equestrian trail standards shall bi submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. 24. This tract shall form or annex to i maintenance district for maintenalce of equestrian trails. i I i i t 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, ire conformance with 6ener-1 Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building p ?--nits and occupancy of the units. B. --Parking and 'Vehicular Access �1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. _401*_ 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimuia 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 2& feet wide. _Z4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with �/ Ferthill Fire District requirements. ® 5. All parking spaces shall be aauble striped. _ 6. All units shall be provido.4 t, `n automatic garage door openers. _7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be tur•` blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportatior for the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking - sreas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed lan6scape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of buildin, permits. 2. Existing tees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing *_heir precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer,. Said plan shall cake into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or patenti;Aily dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the desci•etion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master PlanDf Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may.be required to be replace on a tree - far -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City -Df Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70%-15 gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. /6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, 'crash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in v- -tical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrig.ted in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold znd occupied by the btjyer. Prior to releasing occup' -,cy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained — — by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, hall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleiviai rock, specima.n size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along 11 D. Si ns I. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance ano shall require review and approval - by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. _ 2. A uniform sign program fe- this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and apprc-'al prior to issuance of Building permits. - 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required I- Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. _ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to V:' approval of Zone Change _ _ and /or VariaT nceiConditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Ilse Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. _ 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract on ; I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand tat said of i,; subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpos, of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. _ 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected Schoul Districts, hall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School Distri(.t within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision 0 map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. _ 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final lmap. or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certificatie? from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community.Development. Such Irtter must have been issued Fy . the water district within sixty (60) days p,-;or to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water, Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all-supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this proj�.;t unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. _ 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development 1. The applicant shall cn =ply with the latest adopted Unifom. Building Code, Uniform Mechanicu: Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable cedes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. _/2 . Prior to is"ance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to ar exi�ric unit(s), the applicant shall pay develooment fees at the established ra.e. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fe•, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. 7rior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. �:t h fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development. Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. _/5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. _/6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant materkul and non - combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall hay.,.the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional rood trim around windows and wood siding IMF or plan: -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with apprripriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. a:.. �,�� shell be it. substantial conformance with the ine ; ...a. g.. ..., �._.. approved conceptual grading plan. ® —2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licersed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist -' and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichevt- comes first. ". ^ ?LICANT SHALL CON ?ACT THE ENGINttniN nTVT5ION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access _ 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as show, on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on _ 3. Corner property lire radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: Aft _-5. Reciprocal easements shall be prG ided ensuring access to alt parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. —6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal c'.rculation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not I-Amite: t3, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. _ 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS � OTHER Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. _ 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improt• °_ments, prior to issuance of do encroachment permit. _ 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. _ 6.. All street improvements snali be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 0 _ 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing Khali be installed per the requirements c" the City Engineer. ,, is K. L' L. ,, c � Drainage and Flood Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the Rational Flood Insurance Prcgram and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive app! _ches, rolled street conn,,ctions, flood protection wails', and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. utilities 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. f. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: R. County Dust Abatement required prior to issusnce of a grading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: and Restrictions (Cr &R's) and Articles subject to the approval of 2. A copy of the Covenants, Condition. provided to shall be recorded with this map and a copy of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association the City Attorney, _ the City. e and Lighting Council. The engineering costs prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape - 3, filed with 'the City the developer- Districts shall be involved in Districts Formation shall o borne ' y standards and procedures. q. Final. parcel and tract maps shall conform 0 E E I W, C.rrll OF ItA1U-O C LUAMONG. S'r,AXF REPORT DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHIL' BOULEVARD CORRIDOR. ABSTRACT: As the Planning Commission will recall during the con - sideration of the General PlFn along Foothill Boulevard, there was much concern expressed over the variety of land uses, existing and proposed. Therefore, the Planning Commission found it necessary to establish a Foothill Corridor Study zone. Staff irlicated that the study would not hamper any development progress along the Boulevard and that we would bring forward to the Planning Commission, prior to development consider- ation, any ii7suec that might arise or could arise from a proposed develop- ment. T1.is is n-�_ issue. DISCUSSION: The property in question i; the Perry's Market site and the vacant land surrounding it. There is an application that will be coming before the Planning Commission for a Parcel Map and development of two of the parcels within the lot split. In close examination of the area, we fot!nd that there are many problems that the Commission should be aware of before approval is given for a lot split of develop- ment on the property. Three exhibits have been prepared for your infor- mation. Exhibit 1 shows the existing zoning and land use cross - hatched on the map as the Perry's Market, the Dry Cleaners, the Drug Store and Pet Store, and the Standard Gas Station. Also listed on the map are the various uses of the property. As you can see from Exhibit 1, there is a real hodgepodge of uses. Exhibit 2 indicates the four parcels which the Parcel Map proposes in its division. The remaining property appears to be already subdivided. :•:,^.:: �.`l."',r, ch°.c:::. ^.y the records t6:ere ie nn Title Rannr4 that h$C been filed with the Parcel Map. It has since been requested. Our initial feeling is that the lot split which has occurred on the Perry's Market site may not be a legal lot split, and in fact, there may be only one piece of property encompassing the Perry's Market site and the remaining vacant property. The question that arises is that with the property zoned C -2 (ceneraly Bdsiness Commercial) is it appropriate to develop all Commercial nr is there some alternative that would be better planning? We think there is. ITEM M NEC Foothill & Helms -2- We believe that consideration should be given Lot 4 and everything north of Lot 4 would be shows how a suggested res',j.,-.ntial tract of 4 develop on Parce'. 4. Higher density could b e property. February 25, 1981 to a residential use on commercial. Exhibit 3 units per acre might utilized also on this The Commission should be very careful in discussing what land uses are or are not appropriate for this particular property since any discussion that might appear to have the effect of a decision on land dse outside of a specific General Plan request would be pre - Surging a public hearing item. .However, we believe that the Commission an give a strong indication as to their desires for development of the , operty in question. Specific- ally, does it appear that Lot 4 is good commercial property, or would it be better residential property. If the Commission concurs that Lot 4 would be better residential and poor commercial property, then that indication can be given through discussion and a minute- action by the Plap.ning Commission relative to this Staff Report. If the Commission feels otherwise for the development of Lot 4, then indication should be given as to what would be an appropriate development of that property. Respec;fuil� submitted, _i ity :cd Attachments: Exhibit "I" - Existing Zoning and Land Use Exhibit "2" - Proposed Lot Split Exhibit "3" - Suggested Land Use ;I El ILI M= + v' t!•+- lw!. t1'•+. 4•-+-:r—.- w-. i. l+�..:�+.- ....•+x..i�es�..rF.,y �::.- ....:...f...:.,,.,. .-_ _.. �...�....+... -` :�.w�+...:a:.s FPO LIO Y7 ••a v.•:t . .ea ac L r. .,••e art °° .: W , mA%dre N' ro r4 IWO L AC fNJL /iii n � /i l ch :. 7 - F t ' 4 HitMasffl�`E. SrR . W V %0 o NouslE • R- h! xy f�SE' . f�!S!° ,rroyl6 %FSdf6 /9lraJa ' •� � '. 5 r_ L Sal 755 14Ae. ICI 11 CAP )tX#Al PEW- AC IWA %I �2A6* It L Sal 755 14Ae. ICI 11 CAP )tX#Al PEW- Ae //4.7T I's .193 AC IW/L 7-4 It A foo 447t I A J14L, 11A -,S, ollRe 7 LAND U59 L O ary OF RANUtO CUCAMONGA SDUT PLEPOPIT DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Garry K. Hogan, City Planner SWECT: STREET NAMING RESOLUTION ABSTRACT: Attached, please find a co;., of the revised Street Naming �s ution as reviewed by the Street Naming Committee composed of Chairman Dahl and Commissioner Rempel. Recommendation of approval to the City Council is recommended. DISCUSSION: The Street Naming Resolution, Wached, has been developed through a copulation of various Street Naming Ordinances from various cities. The Resolution sets forth standards for the naming of streets and for the attachment of suffixes to the streets, such as Avenue, Boulevard, Road, etc. It also indicates what the city is not desirous of having streets named. The Resolution is a fairly standard document and will allow us to improve the street naming within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission Fecrend adoption of the attached Resolution to the City Council. Resoectfulkyjwbmitted, ITEM N RESOLUTI )N NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAN IING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVONGA ESTABLISHING A STREET NAMING POLICY. WHEREAS, it is necessarj to establish a street naming police for new public and private street! in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the interest of uniformity anti to avoid confusion to the public; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to establish a policy for changing existirg street names in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commiss:an of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as f,llows: SECTION 1 -- STREET NAMES A. That street names should be pleasant sounding, appropriate; easy to read (so that the public, and children in particular, can handle the nave in an emergency situation), and should add to the pride of home ownership and comnun't3. B. That the following types of street naves are unacceptatle: numerical names (l;t, 2nd, etc.); alphabetical letters (A, 8, C, etc.); f 1 volous, complicated or undesirable naves; unconventiotal spelling; compo•.,nd names; given or surnames of person! living or dead (Pioneer families, historic persons, etc., excluded). C. That streets which are continuoes shall be extended in accordance with the present street names wherever possible and feasible. D. That discontinuous :;treets shall not be given the same name. E. That duplication of existing or proposed street names i; prohibited. Similar sounding names are considered to a; duplication, regardl ?ss of spelling. F. That in existing arers of the City, new street names shall not contradict the prevailing theme of northfsouti streets named after iems and east /west streets named after trees when pos.;ible and where feasible. G. That streets with a !O degree or more change of directiin shall change names al a convenient and appropriate poini as determined by the City Planner. Page 2 N. That street designation for present and future streets shall be as follows: . 1. Boulevard Special Bast -West Streets to be named Boulevards. 2. Streets East -west streets to be named Streets. , 3. Avenues North -south streets to be named Avenues. 4. Road Any diagonal street which does not-conform basically to grid to be known at ROADS. - 5. Drive East -;vest streets parallel to, but between named avenues, to Be called DRIVES. 6. Place North -south Streets,, parallel to, but between named streets, to be called PLACES; 7. Wad Any irregular street which cannot conform to any grid to be known as WAY. 8. Court A cul-de -sac or dead -end street with turn- around which cannot be reasonably extended to carry the name of the preceding street. ALUL I or A cul -de=sac which serves not more than seven (7) lots s,:a1l carry the same name s, as the street serving .,it. Y{' 9. LOOP A street which originates and terminates on same common base street shall be designated as a LOOP, `cast /Nest or North /South) ° street and named to indicate the same common base street. 10. Frontage Frontage roads shall carry the sane Road name as the street or avenue served #i and shall not be .identified otherwise. - SECTION ,2 -- PROCEDURE A. It is the responsibility of the applicant for development resulting it the cons ruction of new streets to submit names to the City for approval. B. The City Planner "'`or his designee shall aporove all street names in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,' jj Page 3 - SECTION 3 - CHANGING .OF STREET PAMES Y A. The changing of. street ..namgs may be initiated by any..of the 'following: 1. Public request which must be in writing to the City Council stating the justification for such a- change. r. 2. Resolution of Intention of the Planning commission. 3. Resolution of Intention of tine City Council. B. If change is initiated throng) *. ,pudic request,, the ,ity I S, may require the applicant -to pay all costs incurred by i the change (ir.cluding,.but not limited to street signs, ±. public hearing- notifi6tion, e•.,c.). i e C. In all cases, it shall be the duty of the Planning Division, to prepare a report discussing the justification_ for such a change,, recomm €ceding a replacement name and discussing the impact or the proposed change. SECTION 4 - STREETMAME CHAJE PROCESS rA. The Secretary of the PTannino Commission shall plat, the matter on the first available Planning Commission Agenda, and shall submit the report to the Planning Division at R that time. B. The Planning Commission shall hold a public ,hearing on the proposed street name change. Said public hearing shall be n®ticed to all property owners on the street ` proposed for change by mail ten (10) days prior to the hearing, or by the posting of a notice along the street_ at 300 foot intervals, ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The Post Office, County Recorder, Fire District and Sheriff's Department shall also be sent .';ritten notice of the proposed change. C. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, conditional approval, or denial to the Council by Resolution pursuant to the findings in Section 3 of this Resolution. D. Upon receipt of the Commission's Resolution,, the City Clerk shail enter the matter on the next available Council Agenda. The Council shall hold a public hearing. Said hearing shall be noticed in the manner outlined above. i i Pays 4 K ' E. Upon receiving testimony at the public hearing, the ., Council shall announce its desision on the proposed street name-change by'Resolution. The Council may approve, . conditionally approve, or deny the street name change pursuant to the findings in Section 5 of this Resolution. If app",oved, the Resolution shall include the date upon' which'said chang4 will become affective. This decision shall be final. Sixty (60) days prior to the effective 1 date of change, the City Clerk shill ser:d written notice of the change to the Post Office, 'ounty Recorder, Fire District and Snevlff's Department. SECTIOW S - FINDINGS Street- names may he, changed pursuant to the following A. That the proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan. S. That the proposed change is ,insistent with the adopted Master Plan of'Streo.; and Highways or adopted Circulation Element, C. That the proposed change will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment. D. That the proposed change is deemer necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. SECTION 6 - SEVERABILITY The invalidity of any word, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part of provisions of the 'Resolution shall not afifsc:t the validity of any ot.er part of the Resolution which can be given effect without such invalid part or parts. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 1961. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t BY: ` . Ricnard Dahl, Chairman A ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission F DATE, March 11, 1981 TO: Manning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Pli -Per SUBJECT; DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMENT ON PROPOSED HOUSING ELEMUT ABSTRACT: Attached, please find a copy of the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) letter of comment to Lauren.Wasserrrran,• City Manager, regarding their review of the Rancho Cucamonga draft housing element. Thera are eight areas that this staff report will cover. Seven of them are in answer specifically to questions or issues raised.within the letter of Februa.y 11,-1981 from HCD and til remaining eighth issue is the revision proposed 'a staff for the Hou '.rg Element of the. General Plan for the amity of Rancito''C!jcamonga. The amts of concern are zoning consistency, exemption for of trdable housing for mandatory school requirement, Ab 2320, affordable housing opportunities for low- and - moderate income employees, housing near employment centers, inclusionary zoning and implementation of cq 1963. The first seven items we have listed do not requiro ary Commi:>_ action if the Commission concurs with the I responses mar<:e. T;:e eighth item, revisions to the housing element do require the Planning Commission action through resolution. DISCUSSION: Pace 3, paragraph 2 indicates that City Staff has informed HCD -.that current zoning is at a lower density then the Draft General Plan calls for. As the TI anning Commission is aware, the current zbning,_which properties wi•t;hin the city enjoy, is that of the County of San Bernardino and in some instances changes which the Planning Commission and City Council have made. The time line for the preparation and adoption of the City's new Zoning Ordinance will take approximately one year. It is a our anticipation that roughly one month will be used for the preparation for the initial document to begin the cansideration process. Substantial review will occur by the Zoning Committee; and 'others before the new Zoning Ordinance would go to; hearing at the - Planning Commission. Alsu involved with the new Zoning Ordinance will be a new zoning map which will implement the General Plan, i.e., change all of the zoning to be in conformance with the General Plz<. AIL x ITEM 0 w Staff Report !larch 11, 1981 Page 2 Page 3, paragraph 3, indicates the City may 'wish to consider exempting subsidized developments from the requirement of school letters. Our best information to date, from the various school districts within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, indicate `.:hat there is no problem in issuing a school letter indicating available capacity. If, in the future, this situation changes, the City may wish to consider possible exemptions for subsidized units and the ramifications that may incumbered thereof. Page 4, paragraph 2, talks about a new bill which took effect January 1, 1981, AB 2320, that requires the city to zone sufficient land for residential use in relation to zoning for non - residential use at standards and densities appropriate to meet the housing needs identified in the General Plan. As the Planning Coi,iission is aware, throughout the process of the review of the General Plai, the concept of a balanced community was espoused and in fact, written fito the text of the General Plan. We feel that the Plan demonstrates a balance between residential and other non- residential uses and are confident that the consideration of zoning in the future to implement the General Plan will bring us into compliance with AB 2320. Aft Page 4, paragraph 3, indicates HCD's desire that the %:itY provide or assure that adequate affordable housing opportunities are provided within reasonable distances for low.ard- moderate income employees in both. primary and secondary jobs. The General Plan Housing Element indicates that our goal is to capture 30% of the employees generated primarily in the industrial area for housing.. All of those 30% are in the 80 to 120% of the median income level. In so far as providing adequate affordable housing opportunities within reasonable distances, outside the city, that is something beyond the city's control and should be addressed to the Southern California Association of Governments and our adjacent cities of Fontana, Ontario, and Upland. Page 5, paragraph 2. This paragraph talks about the premise that 90% of households will choose to live near their place of employment. Without having this stu6y available for our review at the time of the writing of this report, our.assumption is that the question asked to the households was very ;imp ,'e and did not have great emphasis upon economics. We believe that our Housing Element directs the city to try and provide a reasonable perLentage of our housing in affordable units,.and targets 30% of the employees to be generated by the industrial base f -r' affordable housing. Also, the location of housing that may be within, an affordable range are loca #_d close to transit corridors to reduce the dependence upon the automobile and provide a Treater link in the connection to the industrial area. The Plan also speaks of a Development Monitoring System that will allow the city to better determine exactly where these employees live, how many employees are being captured for housing in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and to adjust our prog'ams'accordingly so that the goals of the General Plan and the Housing Element are met. i, Staff Report March 11, 19$1 Page 3 T , Page 5, paragraph 2, This paragraph talks about inclusionary, zoning and encoarages the city to adopt such a program. The Housing Element indicates. that the city should study incl"lionary zoning as a program alternative. As the Planning Commission is aware, many cities who have adopteti inc'Jusionary zoning have found enumberable problems it its implementation. The County a of Orange has an inclusionary zoning program, which on the surface appears t to have been 'very successful, b::�tever, for those of you who attended the seminar section at the League of California Cities Planning So►nnissioner's Institute, that it involved an explanation of Orange County's inclusionary f zoning practice, will remember thc',t it involves a housing authority fur administration and substantial commitments of staff- time and energy to make the program stork. There was talk of priority processing, assigning a Planner to walk through each and every project through the process aid the screening of applicants, etc.. Staff is not opposed to an 'inclusionary s zoning program, nor' >are we in favor of an inclusionary zoning program. As the Housing Element states, inclusionary zoning should be studied as program alternative for the City.. Page 5, paragraph 3. This paragraph talks about the City's responsibility under SB 1950 which is the Mobile; Home Ordinancesallowing mobile homes in } a single family zone The paragraph indicates that we nape rot provided standards and plans for sites for mobile homes. SB i:;rn does not require r. housing elem^nts to 'indicate locations, standards or pla: #s for sites for mobile homes. It does, however, put mobile homes into the same category in many instances as standard stick built housing. We are currently working on an ordinance to implement SB 1950 and will bring that ordinance before ` the Planning Commission in the very near future. Re ectfull s-u mit`ced, rr 6g n it Panne BKH p f If 1 `. STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., G.nmor -.i'�, WARTMENT OF HOUSINGG p,Nd C ©�ItMi1'NdTY DEVELOPMENT vision of Research and Po icy Deve ooml:nt 921 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 445 -4725 ' �bruary 11, 1981 tLauren M. Wasserman City Manager i City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Wasserman: RE: Rt�,iew of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Housing Element The Department of Housing and Community Development has reviewed the draft housing element dated November 1980, for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Under Section 50459 of the State Health and Safety Code, our Department is a;;thorized to review local housing elements "for conformity with the requirements ;f t Section 6530''c) of the Government Code and the guidelines adopted pursuant thereto. The purpose of our review is to advise the City of any additional Steps which might need to be developed and any additional steps which might' need to be taken to produce a housing element which is in conformity with the 1977 Guidelines. As set forth in the Housing Element Guidelines, the two most important F components of a housing element are: i 1. the identification and documentation of housing needs; and 2. the development of a housing program to address these identified needs. �i In order to conform to Section 65302(c) of the Government Code, the housing element is to contain "standards and plans for the improvement of hous " -- and for the provision of adequate sites for housing" and is to make "ae ,-Le' provision for housing needs of all economic segments of the community." The Guidelines define adequate provision to be "a good faith, diligent effort" to expand housing opportunities. They further provide that such effort is to emphasize use of awide range of local public powers which impact upon housing including a commitment to pursue and cooperate in avaii able Federal and State programs. We have noted several areas which need further development for the Rancho Cucamonga Housing Element to conform to State Housing Element Law. Ask I. HOUSING NEEDS IDENTIFICATION AND DOUMENTATION The City has done a comm rdable job in producing a needs identification section which is well written and documented. In our judgment, the essent,il information. for determining housing need has been adequately covered. II. HOUSING PROGRAMS While an accurate assessment of housing need is essential, the heart of the housing element lies i; those provisions relating to the development and implementation of a housing program. To achieve this, Section 6450 of the Guidelines calls for a program containing five explicit commitments as follows: 1. the specific objectives to be accomplished,(quantified when possible); 2. the actions which will be undertaken to implement the program (for eaampde, city council resolution, land acquisition, density bonus, etc.); 3. the sources of financing or funding (e.g., federal or state programs, local revenue bonds, private subsidy, etc.); 4. the local agencies with primary responsibility for implementing programs; and, 5. the establishment of reasonable time frames for accomplishemet of specific objectives, which include benchmarks to indicate progress. The housng• program should describe what the locality is doing, and will do over the next four years to satisfy those housing needs which you have iden- tified. The City's draft program contains some excellent program ideas.. However, in most instances these ideas are not yet fully developed into a�;tion programs. For example, general language such as "investigate the use of, encourage the use of" is often used. While this is appropriate for a preliminary report of recommendations to the City Council, an adopted housing element should provide.actual commitments as to how and when specific programs Gill be undertaken. For example, the program section contains -a statement that the City shall investigate the use of the Section £ lower Income Rental Assistance program that provides rental subsidies to low- income households. While we concur with this statement, the housing - lement should contain an affirmative commitment to partic'.pate in this program, indicate when the City plans to begin such participation and specify how many households the City intends to assist annually. AM Lauren M. Wasserman February 11, 1981 Page Three Data in t1Se Housing Element indicate t,iat the principle neohd in Rancho Cucamonga is affordability. Approximately 15% of the City's households.'are "(ow income and experiencing affordability problems; most of the needy hou'sebalds are familief: In addition, SCAB has assigned a fair share allocation of 336 households to Rancho, Cocamonga for a total adjusted need of 2,618 househoi:ds. We note that the Sow.hern California Association of Governments Areawide Housing Opportunity Plan calls for the City to address 3% of the'unmet housing need of low income households per year. We concur that this is a reasonable standard for determining that portion of the City's unmet housing need which should be addressed yearly in the housing element. The draft element contains information on acreage in Rancho Cucamonga available -, for residential development which, if built at the wedian density,:could- '/` accommodate over 38,000 dwelling units. This information indicates that the acerr;e is available at various densities to accommodate a range of housing responsive to the needs of the community. City staff informs us that ger ally x2esi;�NfJ current zoning is at a lort:r density than the draft general plan calls f,0. In order to be consistent with general plan law the City should conform, the zoning ordinance to the new general plan soon after the plan is adopted. The draft housing element identifies overcrowding-9f schools as a constrains to new construction. Currently, ;;sidential developers must obtain written r— tification from affected school districts stating that adequate school c.racity is available. The City should, to the maximuw extent feasibl;e,-assure that this policy does not inhibit the prod).;ction of housing for low and moderate inceme families. The City may wish to consider exemptii,g proposed subsidized developments from this requirement. Many of the City's proposed „rograms are excellent i�eas and if further devel ped 2cearding the the five crit€:i• a outlined above and implemented, could be very effective~ in meeting housing need. Some of these include: 1. Requiring developers tr, provide at least 15% of all new housing units for low and moderate incnne households. 2. Using Community Development Block Grant funds and in -lieu payments from industrial gad residential developers-to reduce the price of land to developers who.construct low and moderate income housing. 3. Promoting the use of the Section 235 program which provides mortgage insurance and interest subsidy to purchasers of single- family residences. 4. Investigating the use of revenue mortgage bonds for the purchase of affordaF -` ;housing by low and moderate income households. e Lwvt_i� Lauren M. Wasserman February 11, 1981 Page Four ` AB 2853, recently enacted into law, establishes some new requirements for the Housing Element of the General Pie =t. The new law establishes in part, that housing elements adopted prior to October 1, 1981 anj! in confor- ty with the Guidelines, are deemed to be in compliance with AB 2853. Under the new law, localities must update their elements at least every five years, except that the first revision must be completed by My 1, 1984. Another bill which took effect January 1, 1981, (AB 2320) requires that localities zone sufficient vacant land for residential use in relation to zoning for nonresident -al use at standards and densities appropriate to meet housing needs identified in the General Plan (Chapter 4.2 of the Government Code). In effect, this means that a locality must zone to allow for the development of housing affordable to all economic segments consistent with its needs as identified in the housing element. Tt.is requirement is a strong reiteration of the requirement of AB 2853 that the locality idertify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning aid devel:.;.,sent standards for a variety of types of housing for all income levels in order to meet the community's housing goals. Under AB 2320, the locality's authority to regulate subdivisions is also limited, insofar as the locality must refrain from imposing criteria for the purpose of rendering infeasible the development of housing for all economic segments of the community. ThIs provision parallels and underscores the requirements of AB 2853 that the administration ' of land use and development cortrols be directed towards ac)ieving housing goals. Information in the housing element indicates that Rancho Cucamonga is one of the fastest growing cities in southern Califo -nia. The element contains projections that 16,000 to 19,000 new jobs will ba created in the City in the next five years. The draft housing element contains an objective to seek to provide housing for 30% of the households created by the new .jobs.. We erge Rancho Cucamonga to assure that adequate affordable housing opportunities I are provided within reasonable distances for low and moderate income employees �. in both the primary afid secondary jobs. Presently under consideration in four Placer County jurisdictions is a system by which housing development, both market -rate and assisted, would be developed in a timely relationship to the creation of jobs and a rapidly developing industrial area. A consultant has -been hired to a sist in a study, presently on- going, to plan, for the development of such a program which will f6cilitate the production of such housing. The consultant has been asked to develop a methodology for possible application Statewide which would a monstrate how to link the type of industrial development which -s occurring (including type of jobs, wage rates, and relationship to exist., 7 transportation and commuting patterns) to the housing needs. Among specific factors being examined are: 1. translating wages paid to the workers in ' the basic jobs into income available for affordable housing for all the employees connected to the jobs (including secondary jobs); 2. determining a reasonable commute radius which will not significantly deteriorate air quality; 3. establishing the actual mechanism (zoning or other ordinance, -jsa permits, development agreements) } Lauren M. Wasserman February 11, 1981 Page Five which can L: used to assure that the future housing and economic development will go forward, nand in hand, without creating a strain on the existing supplies of affordable housing, and without causing insurmountable infrastructure financing problems for the local governments involved, and without passing all costs of new development on to the futu're low and moderate income housing supply. Of paramount concern, of course, in the development of the local housing elements is the determination of the most effective tive way to utilize limited public subsidies for assisted housing development, while maximizing the use of local powers to reduce bijilding avi. infrastructure costs and permit processing time. Currently, all of the above issues and others are still under discussion because the study is not completed. However, one of the consultant's findings which has applications for Rancho Cucamonga has been that, given a choice of housing opportunities in terms of commuting requirements and costs :S'•��G of housing units, 90% of households will choose to live near tisair place of employment. From this premise comes a host of issues that Rancho Cucamonga needs to 0-Iress related t", how local governments looking forward to signifi- cant amounts of economic development can seek to provide affordable housing opportunities for the greatest possible proportion of the future workers. Plans and programs to provide such housing must also be consistent with other measurrs to encourage the use of transit and other transportation systems, air qualtiy preservation, energy, conservation and also maximize the existing and planned expenditures for infrastructure needs, _ The Rancho Cucamonga draft housing element contains an inclusionary zoning ordinance a_* a program option that the City is currently considering. A csF'r'" number of comnnum ties throughout the State have adopted such programs. Orange County who, similar to Randlso Cucamonga, has experienced rapid economic development, has adopted an inclusionary housing program which calls for 25% of all new units to be developed as affordable units for low and moderate income households. in order to maint .-in the availability of housing created by such a program, and to prevent speculation and windfall profits, the County has also applied resale and speculation controls on these units. _ AB 1564 calls for housing elements to consider all 'aspects of current housing technology, including manufact-red housing, as a possible tool for making adequate provision for the hoi ;ing needs of all economic segment3 of Vie community. This bill became effective January 1, 1980. The Department has 2f�0ar�t. amended its Guidelines to reflect this new provision (copy attached). The amended Guidelines require that each locality include in its housing eisment, standards and plans for provision of adequate sites for mobilehomes as well as k factory -built and site -built housing. A related bill, SB 1960; which becomes cnerative on July 1, 1981, provides for the placement of mobilehomes in single- E' faaflY resiciential .ones (see attached letter which outlines the requirements of SB 1960). The Rancho Cucamonga draft housing element does not conatin standards and plans for sites for mobilehomes. City staff informs us that Alk currently, land must be rezoned to provide land for mobilehome' parks. Staff II z ti. Lauren M. Wasserman Fibruary 11�, 1981. loge Six also informs us that the City is preparing an ord lance to comply with the provisions of SB 1960. The housing element should c;entain a description of how the City plans to provida sites for mobilehomesi to comply with current law and SB 1960. Wo note that the draft housing element does not contain. any mention of condo - ? minium or stock cooperative conversions. A 1978 amendment to the State Sub- division Map Act (Government Code Section 66427,2) requires that unless' applicable general or specific plans contlin definite objectives and policies relating to the conversion of existing VAldings to condominiums, localities may not use the subdivision map process to disapprove them. Therefore, a discussion of conversions of rental units which includes the City's policies and objectives -, regarding them should be included I:. the City's housing element. In examining the npacts of conversion generally, the have identified three major <reas of concern: 1. protection of the basic rights of tenan�, 2. assurance of an adequate supply of rental housing, and 3. consumer protection for condominium and cooperative purchasers. In summary, we commend Rancho'Cucamonga's efforts thus far, and look forward t working closely with you. We have noted several areas where the present draft should be strengthened to conform with the Housing Element Guidelines and Government Code Section 65302(c). Our staff will be pleased to meet with the City to help work through revisions so tti�t- Rancho,Cucamonua's Housing Element will meet state requirements. If you have arty questions, please contact Georgann Eberhardt or Mary Ann Karrer of our staff at (916) 445 -4725. Sincerely, ` David ivlilliamson Supervisor, Review Section ' Enc. cc: 4; Mark Pisano, Executive Director :.. SCAG r Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Adk try v - THE 2s HOUSING .iND'CO MUNf17 DEVEL.OPMEINM - •n«ta.��a 7a Ha is -asaat Q% 6921) SuBczrAPrBR 3. HOUMC ELFa1CN7 CutDCaleles' Article L General Article 2 Fair Shane Allocation Plant Article 3 The Noosing Problem .article a" T he'Rtut ing Program A•'ticls S Comprehensive Planning Antldir fi Preparation. Update and Review DETAILED ANALYSIS Article L General $Jction , 610d Authority , C-42 Shaft Tntle - 640S. State Polfcy C." Porpatc 6ta3 Scope 611a :Definitions 611_ rerminokgy 641d. Pctrpme of Local Housing Elements 6115 Hawing Element Content -- General 61l& Tide Community to be Served by the Loan! Mauling Element Article = Fair-Sham Allocation Plans Section 6128 lair Sham Allceation 64M lhtrpow of Fair Sham Al location Plans f 6421 AlrocathTe Entity 6155 FW= of Fdr Share Adoption P/anr 649L Content of Fair Slam Allocation Plans AML &M Distribution Criteria 6182 Efforts to Aceommadve Housing Need in Execs of Fztr Shaer Allocations 616. Pohlic Comments on i 3ir Share Allocation Plain I r1m Challenging a Ftdr Shgm .iilootion •NOM The operative'drte ofSubehapter 1 it set forth in Section 61:3 KOUSiNG COMM(iN1iY DmLUPMENT TrrLE 11 �VD I Am 3 ne Housing Problem Seotion � ,Il 6118 Artunfs i Xaudng Meads 64•W vothodald fy Dart Coils Won 6"1 eax nn 1?nckrre Cd is 6dt6 6tJd Givemmi rtalGonmaina Regional � �rlatfontlilps Ax, 1 Tbe.Flavvn; Ptc;rm 61s�1 13e Xouq Prngr:m I I I 6112 PnsArrvinp 71foudag and Yeighborhoodt (iardsblllty 64U titltt Stairdardt and Pf&= foe Adequate Sites Aecrmbil Eyr 6t6ff Aldagaa{ Prfll+idan . Ar i we S Comptehansive Planning Secdnts 6162 6 {Bi ( 1�virpnN jrpb Review t{elndorsst fp to Other General Plan Elements - Internal Cuturttene Regw f�edd 6156 Holsnng i h btrx:oo Plan i 1 �. Prccprritiae► Update and Revw- " Sectiion 61&t 64711 Puhlia c lntmgovm two sar412 Coordination 647= dllt M*.a' n Ifoushm E Finant Rrviety j; 617ti Xouang E; tmWAt Submirdorr I)` 5s78 KJpetarire+ Oate �I • 618Q Adjt�tmcr of Opetadva Darer ti 111' Illp h �yl E ELI ML TrMl 25 . HOV.SINC AND COMMUNITY g &JOa - DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS - (flegistsy Rl. H0. ti--i 7iDD dtdcle 1. Genera( ` 6M AUfhM7b' Tie tionseotata &edhereiaareprescrl6edby the Depa tmentofHous- ingand � Iv: IDMKitipmeat pursuant to authoritygrantedin Health 2nd .SwetyCade t isa d a and Covernment Code Sect'on 6=2(c) , 3n, d are to ' be followed io tbepmpaaadon eflocal housing elem ants required Cavern- Secaan mem: trade 6=,1o). These regulations arc handing on afl cound'es, clues gad rnuatre4 and cities including charter clues ` NOM AutJ ority cited: Section SaW. Health and Safety Cowie, and Seen 6b302(c), Covemrp i,: Cole; Reference: Section 65=(x), Government Code; HISTORY: L New Subchapter 4 (Sections 6400 -Wa) filed 12-7-777, effective thiwdeth day diereaf• ter (Re&ster 77, No. 50). 2 AmendmentiiledS1-79 as anex ergeaeytet% ctiva upon Filini; (Ae;�iterTS.A:o.181, 3. Ameadsamt Eled 8.48;9 as an emergeacn-effectwe upon filing (Register 79. Na 3S). iA Certifcato of Compliance must be filed within i2o Gaya or emergency tan- guage vAd bo repeated on 12. 36.79. 4. Ccrcific= cf Coasplianca filed 10-23-79 (Register, 79, No. 43 .� 6�PZ Short Tic`Ic ' These regu utraas may be cited as the, 'Shoe Housing Flemw.r C&ezZ.,�.a (hereiaar ?er - Qddeliaes'). 6411 StaiePolicy. The Legtslat m Las found the subiect of bousfng to be of wbl'statewide imlartaace and has declared the early atwkwent of a,decea: home and a s2&*gg enviranment for every Californian to be a priority of the highest oxdon The early ateul meat ...f tors state houdag gr�l.requires the cooperaa've par- -'ipadan of the private and public sectors of the economy in 6%rtr to expand haudar; opirartaaities to acc=mcdats the needs ofaff tr'alifarnians for . housing whia6 ' (a) lsttructurallysotwd, wat&- #htaad westber-dght with adequiate cook- mgaao lumbmgfacrbdes,.best right; a ad.yantilation. (b) i, aatrainsdanughroomstopratfiderei ;.oEablej%'71, c7 A, 'ter rupaats (c lr withia tA-- economic means of the housabo.ds who occup; it (d) rp not unavailable because of discrimuatory pmcdces (e) Is siluated in an eavfmaament which does not endanger the health, sxfaty, or welt -hebw ofits occupants and which pprroavides conveluent access to dmgia anent as well as adequate services sad ,&a4fes & rquiremeat that housing eJe:mea& be included as mandatory compa- n nentscfJotal general planrreflectsa legrsladve recograbon thatlocslplanning sac+prnga�aacamtnitmeat aniategraim leinpuisui.oftlaisgaal To assure thatlar�lplatima efFecdvelyim ementsstatemdepah ,, the legislature,?n Covernment Code Secdan 6d7O2jc) has established general standards to be i failowed as the prepara au afmanr.'atorydaounng elements 'Ia) A betasing element is to cm- -silt of stzndardr and plim for the improvemeni of - sou ng and for prov&aa of adequate 9r&-y kr housing. ,b) load& bbn. this element oftheaenemtp? an shag make adequate nraysian fcrthe bounag needr of all emnonac seaxncatr of the Comrouniry." ARM , �� aa�lS HaaSnvc MM ca.HHwr"rY TrIu S (P: DEVELOPMENT PAOMt4MS igOWZC r e0. Na to -613M) 77re purpose of these Cade lines s to make smed$c the general legislative asaadate esta6ltrlted by.% as f?.ili2(cl of he Cavan=eat Code. & Aner- pretatr've rarula ha.% 6e Gutdelioet also esrabbkft the crite�a waica load camplisace wt'a thegraeral maadare afSvdaa aiiQB is m measurers ocal housng elements are to be developed pw==r to thew regulacrnzc la add dW4 if barriers to erlecave housfag delivery are to be reduced it is desirable that al! acdv dfr zektfvq to thep4ira&- gforaad delivery aihouv'ag r.. the sm , regi=4 i,.4d Iocsl Ieveis be boils eooperativt and coardiaated ?bese Cuideliaesa� iateedeil not only trs pravide localities un'tlt specirieguid - ance=d drrectian.& camp! ' wrtft tltemaadate afSeckbn 6a�112(c) butalso to pter;tate patilailiry cf ra at the various levels afgpverramear am Scgp4 Ia regrsirm g a Iecx! hauaag element: sate law kr a camnrelieasive pc: l� 'aua,solimg.rttategyrr�aasiveta thehau +wg�re_rtsat't6eeae7ie.cnmmu- nitZ. llneedsare to ix adeVuardyaddrazed kiseneatW that the=va at the I=V housidy Clem be lid omented zod;2d)cad While dacumecrataaa of houvngpmblem the scope of the 1s azeatrab the heart of the homing elemeat &At a mare prdcisiarts relatinpM the devalopmeataad ipplew w adon of a housing program Ya housia element is to make adequate, pmvrson for the haraaag Ge-tIs ar °ai ��mrc :egmearr of the caramumtr; tt must wnhwl assuruacer abat a pproroolk=& documena and aavlpres will he addressed oa Level theprac8°csd tkraugh thesaategaessad o0li�esiPdevelops These Curde• haws ar?*.iategded l0' 4 imch no u=C= Ma Z�m�eaAz Atmedia these a de%i s;eschoftbe,Wjwwj,mmushadhavethemesa- Mir sadftted mesusapuis (icentrlyapetatiaspursusatto cerrfaa6124 ofthere CY" � f CauacrlaFCosM�araeate "mesasaao r�naested�sutrrrattoajaiat rsercdsa ai*wers a3rc�enr to uadett�aaaiag and wease membersbtt� l rcnmpaserf satetyOf elected affaials of uaid of kdd govemmeat urthia tie { `: p?aarua jurirtiibaba cr their reprtseawtives and whirb it recognize + as as ar wi 4Depanneatal Ur&aDevelop- P - 3agmt7,b` audaffwd meat m � parrmeat ms e rh, r= aatofBouscg=d`Camm&aityDgvelop- Di, ertor "me= the Dnectar ai the Depar=aat ofHousag and Cbmmu- nit, Dewla Elderly' derly' mesas persons & years of age or older. Far.' uy built housing•• mesas a aait u dedaed by Seeriva 199 of the He Ith aadSafety Cade andiaaWesa dsm.1&2g unit which is either wholly at ., uY subsYaatisl prrt maaufactued atan ofls'te laratioa and isas:'r_mbled oasite. � Facbtag�udt housing sball act be deemed to mcit..,de a mobtiehame, mobile acc=wy bwIdrag or =ueturr a recresaaad v,, hih!e, or a ccmmercnl caaca C, avertlhouaagaiar: Fefares" orivarftfarrs "maasaregta�aal8eoo3rapk` icas':usrn established by the allocating eatr'ty, within. wiJich Joc:sliateraedaa has resulted is an economic and scaa/mtetdeoeadear_ with respect ra thepravt= man afhougnr, employmearartdsers�tce npE+omrritres Ak ' 1 7� 1 TrrLE ?S HOUSING AND CoMhlvMM 4 84L4 DEVMOPMENT•PROGRAMS (P( ) (Rwistsreo. No. tt —RSaot Hnadi capped "means personsaeFemiiaed to have s ph)dcalimpairmrnt or mental disorder �hIu h is e•pccted tc. br of,'ongg- continued or mdefrm'te aura- ,ion and is o such a nature that the person'sahft, to Gvelndepeadentlycould be imp -aved by more suitable housing condidons 'Houlehold "mearxs all persons occupymga single dm- %S, uaff rlousm unit" at ' unt mr im, the place of permanent or customary and usual a&de ofa mc(uding a 0-kl sly dwednZ a .Angie unit in a person, sma two firm /vdrv4Uurei multr= famr/y ormuTti purpose du eliing, a unit ofa Co 0- cr c wperadvc- housing protect, a nonhousefeeping•unit a mobile- home, or aqv other reidentfal unit which either is considered to be real Property under State !aw or cannot be moved without substantial damage or unreasonable cast :Large family "meamr a gamily a(5 or more persons "lorality'mesnsarty au : ; cityandcounty, orcitymcludingehartercidea "lower ' -income household mesas a household who:- income with adjust - meotsforhousehv1dsia4 doesnotesceed80% ofthe wedlsnhouse-holdmcame of the standard metropafitaa statistic21 area (SMSA) n , outside SMSA s, the ` county '.Manufmctured housig "mesas mobilehoaes s d fastary bolt houaax : Warket- "me=thawhou:eholdr °the ratchouseholds who, araerean)7ed by, alocatLg endty, have the &maW capability to meet theii housing nto without sacrirnsng other essential needs ",Mobilehome "moans a structure transportable in one or more section; - s-gneddad equipped to contain not more thaw two dwelling units to be r with or without a fouadrdoa soam. kob lshome does not include a: j. donal vehicle. commertirr arch, cr`factory- -built housing asae6ner" rove ".Modalrrhome "mesrztfa'ctot ^••built housra_s, as defined abrv� Needing rehabill'tadon "refers to a housing unit `which in its present stare matenally end the health, in one or wS= safety or wed -being ofits occupants more respect; and which is economically fesdble to repair: Needing re eat" cetera to ad wFlGng um whicdr in iti preec �t state materisUyea the health, in safety or. wellbesirg oflts occupants one or more r&pmtq and whi ab is not economically to M, to re 4Vaa®arketrate house_ holds "means hotuebalds svh5 as rrZe aiaed by the allocatins entity, to not have the 6aanaial capability to meet their homing needs wfttrout.% ri6dag other essen2al needs '.Sitc•huilt housing" means housing built in a conventional mace-: upon a site rather t!saa in a fac rory and whia is not mar. -dictured housing " Very! ow- incomehousebold "mesnsshousehold whoseincome,1khadjust- mentsforhousehold Sze, doesnot mrecdWfor ofthemedlanhouseln:lo iacpn:. of 0je standard metropaht m shtdsdcal area o .outside SM. Lr the county. NOTE: Authority cited- Section 50M, Health and Safety Code, and Section 65302(c), Government Code. Reference: Section 65302, Government Code. HISTORY: 1. Amendment filed 52480; effee++ve thirtieth day theresftex '(Register 80 „No.18). Sail Terminology; !Me fallowins• words are used throughout +bese Ciddel!nes to indicate s :vhether a particular prov&on is mandatory, add smy, orpennadve . z” sad , HOUMC AND CQMMUNM '(P. 69"x6) Dvfmopmsyr FROC&umS JRpiaweo.. k:11i+•G::a04 ja� ".4fusE "nr ". shall" identrn" etamaudatnryprovisianwhach :tlllcrs�5esare requared to follow (b) Should" idendjB!s guid«wce provided by the ilepp=eMi based an tte�3W, LoGG?l dasare advi;-d to fvJ1Ow t62f �CyySaera[7aCi`CDJtLtiIIedlII Si daaCDce ais a� the absence ofcampellaag, rountervaalaog considerado,124 but are not rsquira4 to do sa. (e) ".1fa; "identifies a permdssive subject ar part ofths t,'urdelivas whath is left fully ta' cae discredon of the lacalatam • 641 1*urpasaafLocslBausigh7eareats: ds oe majorlaral hnusaagstrategy documene tba lcw 3.' hausiag element it of ebe iiseaded to provide cruaerss and puohc u�crais H Izk as urtderstaading haurigneed of the cnivauaaty, and to setfor�z as iaregrared set ofpolicies arirfFrn�,. susarmedatthesttaaas�earafderiaed�tsad�lasadaut�t6ebousinA r »� of a local caa:mit -- elewort will serve not only as a pro m�afl esprrsiat,• meat ro acer bun wi1j also pravfd �utdance acd dire^aar: to vc+l �overameat2t of dc- �'son�s+Czng:a 3l1 caratter�r n- .latag to haussn� fir additiczk t/re pmvicon deawe housing in a 1246*' eivaratvaent, especaily far lower Income households; is a goal whose armnment deaeads upon the sbared Pnmmi4sreE.r locgi wdol: The lor+l hauling element i* rnteaded effedertb oxate and gyve to Promote j wr raardar aCai aflacg sate and kderal housiagPo d--s and _ &ti& FbusragEFrateat Ccnteat- Cacerl Aft Leal on raag �temei� sbatl include the fa/19svings ja) fin accordaaer svit6 the pmmsiais. of eira'cJe ai evaluation of the the bausu housxag problem tadudu g 3a a tiatyss of the c Par=ty ai the cansusuafty i g with decent boor- �' supply to provide all eronomrc s.�rsteits of �, �L) Inaecar'eacet tth the ptm n aE safArtlCte4ahatLRA�F�ldgramcO r iig ofa romvrehensive pro6fens•scu'c ' suategyadoired by the locsrge�vua- aog body which both L=61isiier housing gaa1� ,aa(rcfe� aad pnaritr� s nag the houaagprubiern. and sea auaed atallevmtiag ursmet nand and reseed Earth tha croutse of acdaa which the loca�iy is ut;dertJang and iarends to uCdertalcr. to a ectaate those police and priorideS .4fa ay adequate !Dr the hou:ubf eie� =li e+canoraac Seffireatr of the CD1nII7unity Prcvidau requ& r etch loctltty to Aw afB aaveiv ,thruug fns hAusiag Element pro- gram, for a balance housia supply suitaaf to the needs of the ccrzsmrtiity as daffhed in Section 6116 a&' regulacaar vj& ?be Comm,mity To Be ferved i y the foasl Eousirrr Memeat. Becauselartlhactuugpalic� '`e*aadFra lravemarkeraresastvellaslocal i impact, aid bectusff lint vagieed is a ctiaa oft + gearralhousnrraa�kak it & not eannYh Ara lacaUty to messurv- Ar reSP=32- ifih.a to the canunaai4o in terms of the housing needs of its resident 7omdadaa In addirioA each housing mar let area share,' with other localatr'ss the locality wid a a g�eral coilecdve reponsbL tyformalong adequate pro vaon for the houstnoVedas' lotion 21arefore: tbehousng afat lernnomiosapnentsolt6e�uarketarespapu element also must by respoadve to the hoasq�v nedds of a fair share of tbase 1 households Who do notlive in the loc4U but whose hcasiag OPPortztnaties are j affected by the plaaaiug decad'ois of the locslaty. Far haasia,,f elemeat purposes the caatmuaity to be served by the larva share of those market area households deter- houdag, element fadudes a .far tiirted purscant to.3rude 2afthese Cwde uses; woo mould live cvathut the lccsl and choice of hatesiug appropriate to their needs jurfsdicdan were a variety available. iT 25 Hac MNC .+.vn Comm mvm Dzvmopm F.IT PROGRAMS tReaeatc n, ran �o -aasam Ar&cle 2 Fair Share:Woratioo PLurs &M Faf; awe Allncatr'aa. To assist locah'tes m evaj=tWS. their IS& share respob _,&U es and to provide for as equitable and reasonable disc: butiora of responsibility for accommodatingg the loca- tional needs of all ecorromic strata of the market region, the Depart meatofHbusagaad CommuaiivDevelopmeatshal ,loreacbgeneral houdaggmarket area svithfn the state, prepare or delegatepreparatio i of, as provided m Section &24 of these regulations, afar share aBoca- daa plan. =. 69= Purpose of Farr Mare Allocation Plans Tirer purpose of the fak share allocattbc pLan is to provide localides with a general mea3zue aflocal rfsponsblLrt . -: r addsesdag a fairsbare of the ffiarket area housing teed The .Farr share,' alto =tron vri11 pprroavide each locality wr7h a pnmuoptiveidentr£catron ehousingaeerisfar which adequate " pmviaaa must be made in the haul err element Fs�• Ailoeatiag Eatdi), Mch Council of Governments is dek- gated the preparation of a fair share allocadoa plan for the housing market or markets mt�:a its : ograplrr'csd jurisdictron, provided that, where pprrreparation ofa A& share a:7ocatba plan is delegated to a Coua- cf of Governments initial allocationssball be campleted zo later tb= MY b 197a Y the Council of Covern=ents does not allorr<< ins: -1,-_r ar.:a houdng ae-ds among the locaUbes wid u the eneral housing mFJcet area, by July 1,1978, the Department shat pertorm tb- housing needs allocation w, -,?cb bad beta delegated to the regions! pl=aning body "bare general housing market areas are a=blisl: td by the Deparr- ment outQde the jf'L=' dretioaal reach ofa Council ofCo vat =ent� the Denartraent iball the laeslides provide within the general housing marketares Evith ac vanortuaity to formulate as ailocatr'ga plate for the area. me iocalitres shaulave a pedod of one year avernotifacatioa by the Depxri Trent that they constitute a general housing market area, within which to esrablish a fair share allocadoa plea.- The Department shad upon request provide the localities with terhuic zl am:r=c- is prepani qg theirplau. Hwithin one year of the date o nod£cadana plan has nor t ea preDareti the Deparmrene may at its discredna prepare a plan for the general housiagmaarket area. to;l& Foos of Fair Share eWotwdon Plans: hr allocsdve fair she <y responsibilities, the allocatiag eadty should facus on acn- marker rate, touseholds: In most circumx=ces the private market mecbaa&m will adequately provide for the boudng needs of market rate hrrurlboldc At the discretion bf the aLlacatiag entity, however, the alloca,9`vn plea ffia3• also iacorporate such mat or rate households SLM Content oilF'a& Share A1lbcadon Plans. Hach fair share al- location pp.'za sbs1L (a) rdenii& the gene ral hcusiag marker area to which it applies (b) Fstrmate by tenure a,;d rent /sales price the immed'ate and pro-• " jected regionalhousingneed ofnoumarkre-rate households Such need estimates should include the folloa -fog caregorids: size (2) Household r I� 'Tr= :5 HOUSING AND COmw,lUNr 4 DEYEt- DPk4E`CC PfiQCRAAtS f (Ralicter SM. Na Ct —sf.Wd drticra't The Housing Problem �sicrtalning Hn ssu,y ,'.:edx ,, ?1e llndamental mescrre ofsuccess 0fs lacy! housing elemerr is its et%c- hvenesslaaddresirrr. iouvngneed.lfahausmrelectrenr stomakeadequate provisio.7fnrt /tehoust igneydsofadeconouncseg�ne itsottheeommuruty, the dimeasons,^. av' chararterorneedinusr .�irstbesscertained hraus�aneeds�risc . to tfie erten: that the edsatrr�housinggsupply fallsshdrt ofpmvrdingaaeconom- icsegares: ts0ilhecommwutvl- --- decensh0ura� Ir.'�uesung the damensi0ns aid character of need for w }rich 2dequate provisimi mc:sr be made !n a leca! _ hourag eiervent, -a ;qty must consider thq housing need,,_of households rCldlag wit Bin 1ts,960 phrcal It' nsdlcdon ant$ the prospe,cdve need formar• yeht�te hausiaga(ong with its fa r shore allocatiau 0fthe nonmarket rare hous- mr aesd wthla' he gene m/ houuog,'rnarket ores of which it is part fn cvalua *�� h0usutg needs local hauung elements shat! include estimates oF. (a) Frwpecbvr nerd far marlcerrate housing over s five year period - such. ev �z' ate to take into account. (1) hxpected � +rw household farrnation. (�!n ibe hou&2g. preferarfces of m dent households: 2) ts ' p) X4.6 cipated papuladan gmtvrh 1 ear a rtuniGes (4) E'gpvred growth m emp oyty pPo (5) Such other facto nas the la°ahtydo_tasappropriate. !l'hercrthe,locay is acctptsa fatr share aloa:tion coveringa2arket'tatevek'rarket mac housing Bousiagneed mdependearlornl evaluaaoa ofpraspec need is optionaL (b) Its mediate housing needs analyzed m terms or: (1Irdability -^the Dumber of very /oty and.lbou3etrold inromeeholds occupying: ututs at a cast greaser than � o o(grass (2) pyerrrowdiag —tlie number of hoec�ing units with I.Ul or more. persons • �ream. 5J Sca'tgbiGty /Babitabr!!ly —the number of households living in :housing � n neer (eedia�a� 'ration or replacealeat. ls� den, an to thespecial needs of Iarae fat.tities, minorlts 6ouseholdti the elderly, `die haadkaaped and perso as 1 result or" ' actin {rte; and others as the Iorrlity derma appropriate. Methodology. r, The1 .0=1(ty`sassa=ventof3ousiar� need callhd for b- Section tor_j is based on anar,�ss?af the relationshipp betwae. it the evstiak bousiag stacir and the economicrnddemo mviticch= crerisn' csofthecommunity!nevaluatingrhC ea vaghodrvagstn-ii dthesac0- economiccharrcteraft6eroAununrtt; the 4 locality m�' use aaymethodolegy which assures ress0nably accurate gnd relu- r;. ble estimates of need ??te men5odolo 'es uFi�tn wnicB the housing element � reliesirre�al uatia$ desdmustbeidentifred, ei.heriamehorrsingelementitself ..r or m as appendrs accampaay?ng the Clement 1, :, 6492 ,data Cotlrction. m 144(1. ,'� The drimary source of data rs the United States Census.. Be�rrnlnrg �. U.S Census data will ,h ^-coVected every 5 yews rls. the more uccurata �arrdf; timely c` ensusinformat,,,rr becomes available.lt should be incorporated a ro th O data base Prior to the availalii!!ly of 14vU reasus data l0cr!ltres should use Lh'" best readily available data. Howlvc AND Cobtnn.WM DMLoaat t%r 1r= 25 .. IRoyigm 77, Na- 5a- 12.10-771 . (1) Sueb ocher _-pecial ne`dr as are deemed approprsare by the aLlgcatiog.endry, The erainare of ptofecred need should curend over at least s three Year period followiag the affective date of the plan. , (c) Assign to escb 14-1072 lair share of t o need estimated fa (b1 afthis section. eca Distribution Criteria. in allocadng to each locality a. fair share of the respon5Y& ttyyfaraddressiagaanmar�ret- ratehousing.7eed, + each allocadag entity sball establish its owr. &- ibadon criteria. The distribution criteria developed by the allocating endtymust be consist- ear with the podcy obj,�:oavrs outImed in Secdotz o t5o(a) and must seek (a) To �eszppacd the rage oflocadoa3l choice within the mar area for noaasarketnte households. (b) To improve access to employment, senwes, and other oppor- tuuides for nonmarker -rare households: 6a-* E otrs to Jecommodate Housing :Peed in Excess of Fair Sham dMocaaow. The fair share allocarions called for by these Cuide?iaesartnctinrerzded to dircouragr. r pprevent attvloca?itvr"rorb seeking and etwumgiag the developrrieni � ofa=red housmg=erc :ss oftbacaecessary ro meersrsfair mare oftne market area housragneedr Local ceramii=enr measured is tetras of the supporaag prograuns a 1 localftv is willing to brag to best on its housing proalerns is a actor - which sbould not be i�;nored in disa7burtng governmear suosii: es. ;fUe a state orkdeial agency ma y wish to pve pn'ariry ro applicsdons for housing subsidies from those localydes who have not vet sadsn'ed cbeir fmr share respponsibrlides, the fac•'thar a locaUry wisbes,to cake responsibility'ar acrompadaaagbousinrneed w arcessoflrs& rshare should not be a basis for denyvig a locadgry appCicaaon, 6,LV. Public Canrments on Fair Share Alloc+oun Plans: The al- locadng entity shall. pn'cr to the efrecdve date of the allocadan plar;, m ord reasonable opportutury for full review; comment, and input 5t, both the m7ecred localities and the public on the derern2iriacons or o nonmarker -rare houszng needs for the gene.-il housing marker ,;rep or areas, the da-eibuaon a- rada developed pursuant to rectron &CO and the proposed rain• share affocadotss made pursuant to .made _ of these Cuidedaes 6a476 Challenging s Fair Share .411ocadon. The allocating entity shall escablish a procedure by which a loczbF y a cy sha.Uenge its fdr - share allocadon as,inequitable or uaremonatde. t' Lre such a chap w e does notresult is a mutually, acceptable ahocacait, the locauty may, in itshorsngelement wecare its beliefthat the alloc3rion exceeds, irr.Fur share responsibilities Where a locality proposes to substitute its own fair snare ngures fora challenged adlocaaoa, however, it ass=es the burden of esrabGsF_na in its housing clement iacto7 or circumsranras which b7cicare that toe 2ssigned allocation u unreasonable arinegwta- ble as appued to the local ftrrscicdon and oriwatiing the fstr sure figures it proposes to subsnrure ;br the challenged allocadons. . i i �6 6;W HOUSING AND COMMUNITY TITLE (p. 692.10) DEVELOPM NT PROGRAMS M Nand- 431101' .: •' ir¢W Afsrket Constraints If the housing element is to have ao impact on the private mark 'ugh the st+ndardr and ph= it sets forth, it first 'con- should analyze the mi,, stiaincr wh1;:h affect the production ofhouwbg. Inaiuded in tilt analvsirshoudd ue an atsemnent of the cast factors which contribute to sade price or montbin rentals; and: vreval uationoftheOpesofsite •b&ltandfactory- buidthousingand mobf/ehomes (.single- famflyand family) multi - w%%ch can be provided at di'ff'er- ent price levels within the a mag corsstramt� bf the market _ .`NOTE Authority cited: Section WI39, Health and Silcty Code, and Section 6E3M(c), Government Code. deference: Section &5702, Covert went Code. HISTORY: 1. Amendment filed 3.2.80; effective thirtieth day thereafter.(R_egister 88,,- No,18). S" Covemmental Constraints The housiagelementshouldalso analyze those publicacGonswhich corzstrairr the maintenance im� pro anent or development ofsi.e -built and factorvbuilt 1. and mobil <homes Thisanals vs should in -Jude; (a) Local land use contrcic (b) Local budding codes and that ' eenforoement ' ��) O�e a, d o�site mir;roveirientsrequired ofr! vedoppeers pprroocc< Vatzarringchanges; usepetmftS bu ldirigpermi;�, envi= ronmeriYal de zrann:, and any other types ofpei7riib appro j" or rltarni�ces required by the laity prior to construction or rehabilitation of s housing development • (e) Feds required by the lgcality pr,.br to consr6w 'on errebabilitation ofa Lorwrtg devrlopmekr (f) Other pubhe actions es deemed approprrate NOTE Auttto•tty cited Secaen :E%t39 Health :u1d Safety Code, and Section 833M(c), Goverarnel7t C.Ode. 1t'' {OrGrIQ n019. liMO CiovertEtnmit Code. HISTORY- I. Amendment filed 3.2-ft effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 8Q No.18). 6&& ?legdonal Beladonships: ' Whiten loca,Pitysfzdrsbare allan�tiorr is vas;d on an evaluacon ofla -al inter- reladorshros, r acaGtresmayfindithe 1pfulWirpra,g= development purposes to include in theirhorningelementssn analysis of the repgional contest —' witbia which the locality operates rha analysis of regional relationships could for example: (a) Compare and contrzct the focal housmg, income , population. and em- ployment trends with those ofneighboringjudsd!*ctrb; � the general housing marketarea and of the reriorz. oflocaA==thes 2ctofreponalpresiwasanthelora lhousingproblem, acrd P a7 the hoitsin rob. ems of nei �rf.� 8 p urss dretions th � �! e general housmg market ores, ,end of the regi'oiz drtiele 4 The Housing lrrogram AM The BbusingFi-agram. Once na;pdshave been idenaed and thehousingproblem analyzed,' a local. fty must, Mmugh &housing element move toward theakeviadon afr'detttrfied need and the remedying of the housing problens. For ski's prirpose,- housing . .elements Shall include.? housing program consisting ob t z i TrrLE 25 Haf ONO .i.YD COMMLNrry 84; p .. DEV.EL,AP3tENT PROCWIS (Ha9isen'!0. N6 16�.(.f,tp� (p. 09211) {a) d statement ofthe gazA. policies, acid priMbes, which together prov7de thehumeworkamund Which the localhous nyplaware developedandimpie- rnented !a adoptmglt :signals policies and priorides, the locah?v arpresses a cm='tment 41 act in ;=rdwc- with the standards they provide ds iudreater:.n Secs'on 64Q of these guidelines the Legislature has estab- .lisped the �,ovrsianofa decent home aid a satisfiing environment For every CnliFanaixa as the state housinggeal and'bas declared attainment oftliisgcal . ' to be a priority of G:e, highest order. In �vppot7 af` the state of decent goal o�us� For alb the Deptu� rent has bushed .the following three policy (1) 1 3e$ rovrsioaofdesentpouairgurasadsfving�enviror lmentforallpar sons regarstless of a yet, race se5 marital sLttus; ethnic background, saurce of mctune or other JrM -bary facrors (2) The provision ofhousingselenoa by lomtr'on, type, price, and tens (,7) Thedevelepr„eut ofa balanced re�zentral znvuonmeat wig am,s to employment oprortuait:eg ;eemmuW?7 faeilitfe;. +utd .adequate services. loealhou -h7r" j oral; po&de4 acrd must be prioripes related to the state fairs- ra38oafassetlorp ia,Secton $W ofthese Gwdeibmsand cona'stent with, the three pollcyahjectivessetfortb above Loc31 hausinggoals, paUcieg and pn:�rr= desshould 3e welf rote ted roes t� presenra set oFguidiug p hcrj,�les far the housing pronrrm. - (b) d desaipdaa of those plans which the localitvis rn the process ar#pl& mesrdpgormtendstormplemenrfn furdterinqq thego4 policies, and priorities it has esiahhkbed Each plan descapcon sb. k (!J Meat* the ,specif e objective to be accomplished Where passible, spe- c obje Mi sshould indicate in quantitative terrors the ;uuicipatd impact of the proggrraamm with respect to diminution ire housiag need (2) Spea6c2lly describe the actians which are berag or will be underrakea as part of the plan strategy. W Discuss how the plea will be or is being financed (4) Identifl the pubir'e ageacy which bas the pri c pal responsibility thr implemennng the plan (S) Fstab&b a reasonable time frame for acromphsnmeat of the specr�r0 objective which allows for the assessment of pragress earvcu&r strategy rs sd/ 4�7 the developmental rather thaw im- plemeotrhcnstagcetthealne the h ousingeremeatcometupferadopdon = ,tb,- bousipg element should clearly set out (1) The particular a rpectr of the housing problem to he or being studied, 7e policy the study it mended to implement, ( �) group responsible For,its studyy, (9J d lime frame for completion of the, study. tis(S2 j7eservirng Housing and .Verkhhorhoods Thehouxtpgpmgmn raFalocalhoavng_lementsball describe the ster sbe-%ng taken to preserve evstinghousingand neighborhoods through such me°wxvS Of Mba&litadca, code adoption and enforcement, irmorovements in hob in ma fflemeatand maintenance; and the provision cfadequatemunicip 1 tier and service; recognizrrg that housing preservation' and conservattor. are high tatewfde priorities T- -aortas c 110USINt. AND COMMUNrry TITI.F. =5 (p. 69.2.12) MVELOPMENT PROGRAMS 11teglater W. No. 1E -31-0) bait 1'rrcrrtirrti �fCnrblblhtt ' _ In are rs n hcen aetrnuc?re ar•t:c'd :rf ct�,: • =•n•r rg or cayandfng °alit• cu ,ply of . vundhotvhier. the, c•lfcaolsuchactionsonhnuau {� rllareltbrlit +:�hrtukfrkibe ec:ihiatM.. For example the plan description should ronu.ler the effect of rrhtbditrlian //woNTams nrcluding, anti - retuning actftities and consertudon prog,rarrrs surh as ctufe enforr mint. on rentsand property taresin the afFrt- 1^drreas The housfneprogram shill emphasize the importatrceafpreserting atrnrelabilitt- at the i tme ,time the pht5ical condition ofhousinq. is being im- proved or maintained or nett- houine opportunities, are- beinfi det eloped. 1 t here:the coin ersion ofmobilchame Virks to other uses and ofrental hort.s- Inrtocoudominiumsandstoekcereiperatiyesrrrar- diminish thesup�lrofafrord- ablc housing, the effects ofsuch uctionssheudd he et ducted and actions taken to pn �s ne a:Tvrt/sbilittt \t1TH. authoTity curd section 5W50 Health and Rifety (cede and Section &IM21c). (:averntnent(ktde Refv: once• Section M .4, Government Code. 11ISrc1Rr• 1. Aniondment fitcd 5-2 40: effertke thirtieth day thereafter IRcitioer so, No. IM 61M.. Standards and Plans fur 4dequate Sites The phi kal calve tt of a local iurtsdfction to addre& weed is in part a farnctitn of the atwilabilite ofadec�qqu.te sites Fach locahtr roust include, if) its housing element standards and pl urs for pros Ision ofadequare sites For site• built and factore -built housing and mobilehomez Sites are adequate only to the extent the r protide suitable locations a hick can rnllectit` cl r• accommndatearinepofhousingtttpe , size. annpricel respwi- x, sh-0 to the needs ofall econonde eemients ofthe communrh: fat ciritshilitt •nfindtiduslsitzs•rbousin elemnnfsshouldinclndrsttnn:•trds to be rased in eitahiah'ne the suitability ofr'ndit idind sites for tronmarket -rate housing including ractori -built housing and mobilehomes fb/ Callectit e c apaci ty of sites to accommodate in approprrrte rat{ge of housing• in des-eloping siandards and plans for the ppronsrort nfadequatesites � local housing, eletnentcshyll foruson assuring that Both.lexall,•urd'use controls % and the local infrastructure of sertices and facilihes;rre cornuaible itith the prot7sron ofs range ofhousmgopportunrtvand choiresuitable to the needsvf all economic segments of the communitt: NOTE- cited- Section p 5�W9, W.alth :and Safety Czide, and acct -qn 6i302eci, (•,overnment cca c. Referent- s.ction;SaM2. Government,Code. If1517ORY: k`v 1. 9anendment riled 3-2.80; efreeth a thirtieth da% thereafter t Rc•F cater lift, No 14, 6t=,i. dcressibilitt: The loralitr should. through its housing prvgr`,mt, seek to reduce the efft rb of drscrind4tion in housing, bated on rice. color, religion, ssr, fund" AM. moat d statur nahonil origiet. ,utcestn orothe•rurbitran f,•ictors and to protide miliTuirds:{l,'ainst future :discrimination in 71ou ng. 4 TIME 25 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY j 6J6ti DEYELQP! &-rr PROCRAbts (p. 69213) lRp ?aw ao.fla tm�G3aAi 6460. .adequate Provision. Adequate pron9on for the hoav;i7 . needs of dl sconomfe segments of the communftyr- rrtureseachlocality, thraugh its housmgelement to make a good frith, dih'eent effort to provide opportum'tdes for and to rcilitate the mainte- nance, i n rosementand developmentofau appropriate varieryand choice of aousingforall economicsegmentsoftbe crommumry, consistent tomb Trident- fiedneedandfairshareresponsih9 esAlocalityisnotregruredto ;ndertake programs which are PconomicaUy infeasible in order to make a good faith, , dthgent effort Such effort however, must emphadze the use of those pubhc potvers which impact on site brWtand factory- truiith ousingand mobilehomeg mcluding but notUmiedto and usecontrois developruentcontroh,andre -l- latory concessions and incentives: Such efiTOnmust atso incluoz a commitment P- ursue and rnopel to in available federal and state houdngprograms or ' 'oc it te the marnerinivhr'ch the. l' intends to address its housing needs without such am tancr. In fuMingg its responsibW es under Coverameat Code Section 63302(c), a locality also may, but& not required to, e- Pend local revenues to provide rental suhiziddeg to fmance the acquisidon oflind for the comlyvedw, ofbousing, or to &wce the actual construction ofbousing, accept as otberwise provided by Law. NOTE Authority cited: Section '0459, Health and Safety Code, and Section &MM(c), Cowunment Code. Reference: Section 63.702. Government Code. HISIIORY. L. Atnendment tiled 52.81 et %cdvn thirdeth day thereafter (Register 50. No. 1 &1,. rTrdele a Comprehensive Planning 6462 ZvironmenW.Netiew. The State EM Cmd dines (Title 14, Divfdon 6 of the. Cdi1rnia .4dmiair&j- dve Cade) indicate in Secdon 15W that locn_r houdn,. elements are projects subject to the rovfdons of the California Envirormreutal Qualrttyy.4 (P%Wi and a Resources Caf Section 211tV et sea). Therefore, an intro stt dy neggss- dve declaration imascr be and frl�d or environmental report must prepared with apppropriate agencies priorto the adoption or amendment ofa local hour- ing element Detailed procedures and req imments for such environmental review are specified in the State EIX Cuidellaes 6464. Reladonship to Other Cenral Plan Elements— lntemal Consistency 1?equhvd Internal consistency among general play Dements is required Sectfon 6M05of the Coverament Code states that the general plea .diaU comprise an. intear te4 internally consnteue - -at of policies This applies not onl to the mandated elements but to the optional elemeatr as well (The man ted ele- ments are )and use, boeuiog, circulation, noise, conservation, oppeenn space sea- - nticsafety, scenic highways and safety. Optional elementsinclude corr muirity design, redevelopment ,andhstoncpreservanon.) WherealocsG. EEW rtskes retddon of an v element of its general plan, it should also examine the other clement! (espec(kkv those elements most direcdy related) to assure internal ' consistency. ` 6166 1' i(ousing.4sscst cn: Plan z TAapplykrand receive federal community development blockgmnt funds flocnng Community DevelopmentAct P. Le Si?,M a under the 174 ar,`d locality must mbina a Honsing Asd'stance Plan that. XOUS1,14C AND COMMUNITY TrnX 25 (p. 692.14) DEVF3OPMEVT PROGRAMS , jRtgbto► s4 Hats -t3iC2 "(A) accumel ysurvapr the ronditanofthehouangstmkin the ccmmua 0yawdxss�srs the housing adsnutce needs of.lower-incntne persot t Ow/ud(ng elderly and hand- ippped po=4 large ismihe% And persons displaced 000 be disp(rredl Ictfd4ag in or expected to wide in the ca=unily. (B) specifas a relado annual goal for the auT!+cs of r'velh ° "unib or persons to be aviste4 including (i) the rely ivepro w. rehabihta, _d and exisongd"Ang euu'tx and (g) the sizes and typernfhous ng pw0eca and assstanea bvt suited to tht needs oflowerincrome PC== it. the community, and (G7 indlcatesthegeneralloeatiowaf wpasedhousingforlowerificomFers =4 with the objacdva of(i) furthering the raWizaxaaan o dye cw=unity, including the restore- tk s and rehabiDaCOn of stable neighborhoods to the snadraum extent poscbtet IN ptwnodnegnwerewestafhousangoppo= nidesandaroiding undue eaacenrrxiia sof 4 assisted per..wu is areas c�taining a highpteportion oflow incaune permnx end (iii) Assuring the andshatyofpubGc faci*h*des andsarvicesadequate to serve prcpawd hous- ing pvjec= "SCCdoa J04(a) (4)• These Guidelines are structured so as to encourage an integrated housir plrwfng process which will provide much of the'lnformstron o to ctu `ply with federailawtrlaaogto commuaity development bloekpantfwd7 iar ra parttcuiar, the b.-4afi �psrrooblem analysisrequired by these Ctddelines provides lociYi es wjtb a hr." fmm svhrcb to prepare their Housi ag.1vistance Plans aid can be used its the fallowing ways tyreq�ired bySectton W(b) (3) of (a) The anays r ofsuitabi ly /habiabli called for by these Cudelines provides the (gfarom on on housing condition federal law, (b) The assessment of the housing assistaace needs Jf lower it come households can be derived from the analvsis of need required byy Housing' CaideCrnes Section 5W and the Air share allocstron glade pursuant Element to Article Z (c) Jn atrivingat a rei&& aanual goaCfar the number of dwelling units or persons tote assisted localities can asttssoo rely hesvily an the bouungproblem gaalysic (d) 7bes= du- dsaadp& psforadegtuatesitesm ntainedin Section AWwiU be helofrd r Jo=Ut7es in tdeattfyi.- q generd locatioaa for proposed assisted bousuig. fn addition, the Cuideliaesare desgasd to eUcitfrom locaUtiesa comprehen- for addreanghousin In that tie use of kaeralrunds to sive strategy -Tneed. aUevratebousingne-- &isani'mlwrt3ntcomponeatof locals&: togy tnefederal- Plsngre I lyfunded activities outlined in the localites Housb7gAm's'tanee prop. erlyincludedrn the,pprogramsec &cn of thelocalbousinrelement. Forhousing however, the ac &vit(es must be described N accordance element purposes with Me pro visions of Section 640 of these C-uidehnes TITLE 25 Eloum c am_.Cottisasux= DEv=apu=rr 69215 PsC)C;.�.15iS 'Iflpiaoi Tf. Na sQ—tY t577) . Art(cle 6 Pr epa=dcn. C vdate Sad .Review 6s� Public Psrticipadarr. Tae $ouszag el�eht scald $e devei• a 6rough a dreuaa -ma/3 process wiuca is acresdcle to aaFd direcdy u2��olves all ecanamic segmearsvr the caaimuaity. Effective ,ouvlic iavalvestecfrenuu rs that cti ehs are, trepr.aror ed as the hcus -- iagelea2carisdeveloped pad ae orovided ocnnrtunities to review and caauaeatoatheelea 7eatasit:slieiatlpr �rcd.Fxamplesoiparrfcipa- f a'on tecaniquw to help ensure respoastve planauag m ude: (a) informal wor�gsessioas: (b} 1'uhGc besriags. (c Advisory Camasirtees: Pubac (d) tararsxaadoa Prop�a Tae pvhlic para�doa process easployea'by the 1oe31ityia developa:g ix housu2g tlemear must be des=:ced fa pie elea2eat 6fiZ! Iatetgr+verameatal G`aardiasabz. IFbo „�� ar-_d witbui a general bou#vg market area is to be roafroared eaer2vely, the lacali- des widda the aurr_ker area musr coon,: --are as a candauing bass. ?Zte developmear of a fair share aff=don play provides one vehicle For as�oiag iarer�overaraeatai cots aiaatioa. Lac3&fcs should our ue ; to ranattag tEre 6ousiag aril or suc- regiaaa! acoraacbes pthep A Ceu=aT of Qvem - -zap cap also provide a valuable service to loci esbyrevietvr�l acsl bousage�emeatscamazadecalperspec- tiva. E=b IaczW /- should provide a copy ofitfhoudan temepr to the CouaL^1 of ✓*r- mpzz= Axr ib are& L:C= Qas 4ould z&c provide the governing bodies of cpadguctzf.lortl jursdictioas with rapes 642"M Update. Because of the inheready dyaaaric narure of trite local aaaiagpmms; cariockrevrew wd aoproariarerrvidoa ofthe 16=1 usz)2gefe:pearife'3 an zizL7- Behoudagelemen:s&Bberevised as need dict3re4 buns[ lea than once evety5va ye= This periodic mvafoa shall icaludr, as anampriate. (a) Revidon at the bousag problem analysis to lrrcarporate mew - c mms date.made available by the United States Ceasys at rive year ircervaLt (b) Ilevisioa ofd a bousing prvgrlra tar (1) Evaluate tae euecsveaesf of the housing program m as^o� `« plahiag housing objecSves and rae-c.” dag :be pcltces and pri& des esablisnea is the bousfay element (2) Set out pi= the di- has uadertskca sutce the lasr update or imiamc S to !wbiet3ear to i&e fuLWe. (3) Idenc' y the rarrebrplpress ,vhichlravebeen discondaueddace the last update or will be dtscra daued, iadicadag the toasans For .. them difccattauaa'oa. f nl­,_� 692.16 Houswc .4= Co.%t%murrY DE.op.%tsvr TrME 25 M*914 ar 77, Na 50-- 17.14:71 In add(don to the periodic updating of the housing element itself , localitres should inl or zzadv revaluate their housing programs at more frequent u7tonvzUs. Such re- evalu3con mav'be 3ccompliAed througha.. earlyreporr 1vhtG$ examines the housir.glorogram in accordance lvith the oua neserforth in subsection (b) of tussecdon. Thisreporr could beincorporated m the annual report which each local planning agency must File with its governing board pursuant to Covernment CCode Sec- don &5M(b). 6174. Housing Element..Review. Health and Safety Code Sec- don 9113 - authorizes the Department to rev ewlocal housin 'elements for conformity with the reqquuem =tsofSection 6ZO- of the Covem- mcnt Code and these C.udelfttes; and report its &dings At least M days prior to the applicable operative date as set forth in Section 6178 of these Curdelines the local housing element shall be submitted to the Departmentto be reviewed for conf7r& with Gov- erament Code Section 6 O2 and these Guidelines The Department shall report to the localdtvitsAndingsas to the adequacyofthe element within 60 days of receipt. If the housing element is found to belnade quat-e, the Deparmtear shall set forth in its report the areas of non - rnarormaace andshall, upon request, work with the iocat72y is alleviar- iag the inadequacies Subsequent to the appbcable operative date as set forth in Section 6478 the Dec arbanat upon request of the locality or ofany interested part' or at tie Directors disc etion, shalt review adopted local housdn elements. %e Depart�ancshalRreporritrAndings within areasonab le time, but in no cast later than Sl7-days after receipt of a request for review. rf the hausiag element rr found inadequate, the Department shall set fort in its reports the areas of non-conformance with the requirements ofQve=ent CodeSecdon 65"lXznd these Guidelines £mans- on of this administradvereviewprocessisnovaprerequisdteto judicial review of a local element The Coveraor 's Ofike of F.raaring and Aesesrch will be provided with conies of all nnddngs 4=ed by the Department Tie fut'(Vre ofa locality to comply with the procedural requirements of this se%: on shelf not m anymanner effecrihe substantive validity of the element if it otherwise contoras to Government Code Section 4=tcl and these Cuidelines 64M Housing Element Submission. 917-tl?ia two week after the applicable u emdve date as set fartb in Secd6h 6178 of these Cudde- !tines, each of shad provide the Department with a copy of its housing element. Copies of ail sti `veyuenr housing element revisions, amendments, or updates hall atso be sent to the Department upon adoption. 6M Operative Data . k order to facilitate eflective Depart- mental review of local housing elements, the operative date of these reponal .location and provides the following by which Yoca Ves� each of ;,tonal groupings are to have prepared and adopted housing ele- ments in conformity with Government Code Section 65",02 and these Guidelines f 3,. t I A TiTx.£' 5 HOUSING ANq CCfrtl .UNilY DEVELOPMENT § 6ma t it.pitew T!>.li.43- +0,=70 f . (p, 697.17) . , (a) Localities within the regg�toval, urisdiction of the South - ern California Association of Even rnents July 1, 1979 (b) Localities within the regions jurb ation of the As- sociation of Bay Area Governments,_.« „. „.. October 1, 1979 (c) Localities within the regional jurisdiction of the Sacra. mento Regional Area Planning Cc= mission, the Comprehen five Flannin Organization of the San Diegc Regtirn the Counc;l of �,$no County Gover" nett(; the association of Monterey hW v Area Governments t r the Kern County Coun- cil of Governments y January 1 1980 (d) All other localtttes.� ..... April ! 10 I Localitiesshould seek earlier cot ipliance where practicable. �n the interim the (lousing Element Guidelines o Sginallvadopted by the Hoar Band Com- I munit; t Development Commission on June 11 J971 and promulgated as ewer. gencyregulationsby the Departmt pton dugustA 19—(,. shall continue in effect �I NOTE Authority cited Section SW59I Health and Safety Code and Section &W.Jc). I Government Code. Reference: Section I65502(c), 6.rernment Code. HISTORY; � • 1. Amendment of subsections (b), t t) and (d) -filed S I -7:. as an emergency; effective on filing (Rsguter 79• No. IN). 2. Amendment filed -IL-25-79 as an 'emergency effective upon filing (Register 79. N(L:IS). A Certificate of Compliance lust be filed within 120 days or emergency tan - guage will be repealed an 12.2&79 :1 Centfiptr nF Compliancx filed 11 LII�79 tRegia[eR 79. Na �), Ma Adjustment of-Operative I later. In the event a locality determit es :that because of unanticipated problems, it will not be possible to comply w th the applicable operative date asfct forth in Section 647$ thelaza;itymaysts kfmm thaDepartmentareasonableadjust- ment in its operative date of up (a three matrths Adjustment- requests shall be made in writing to the Director a t the Department and shall indudi_ (al . 4 letter ofjtud6catmnsigtet�bythe efddminr`.strativoOfftrror0ty j ,Manager which sets forth the rew ms for requesting the adjustment and (b) A work program, approved ),v the Chief dda iaistraiive Officer or City A4attaget; describing the work sow vleted and to be completed and showing an adoption date within three months � of the ap lieable operative data ere the Director determines I bta.focifmquest loran adjustment in the - applicable operative date isreasonaWeand will promote efectiveimplementa• tion of state housing law and these t aideljnes, the rrtquestedadjustmentshall be allowed Where a locality determines that i three•month adjustment in its applicable t operative date as set forth in Sectii it 6478 is insufficient to accommodate the i problems it has encountereth the k cality may apply to the C. ff,'ce of Planning and Resent ch for a time extension c Cup to one ,yesrpursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 5a-it, A NOTE: ,Authotty cited.• Section 3W% 4 Yealth and Safety Code and Section 6g6a21c). Coternment Code. Reference Section I WAZ CQvemment-Code. HISTORY: 1. New section filed S•1.79 as an emes;ener. effective on filing {Register 79. Na to), 2. Amendment filed 8.$9,79 as an energency: effective upon filing ( Regster 79; Nn :)S). A Certificate of Compliance or in be filed within 120 days or emergency lam Rt'af� will be repealed otL 123 6:9. STATE Of CALFFORNtA :EDMUND G. BROWN JR» Conmor DEPARi'MENr 01 :THOUS.' 7 AND ;COMMTINirf DEVELOPMENT' January 23, 19811 TO; ALL INTERE-ITED PARTIES: FROM: Carolyn Burton, Deputy General CounEel RE: Department's Legal Interpretatian of SB 1960 In 1980 the Legislature passed and fovernu, Erown signed into Taw SB 1960 (Rai*ts� which provides for mobiiehomes in single fami'iy residential zones (Chapter 1142, Statutes of 1980). Currently, m my localities exclude_ mobilehomes entirely, or restrict their location to mobilshome parks. —ibis new law, which will take effect on July 1, 1981, assures that mobilehomes wii' have a place in every California community, In summary, the new statute, precludes prohibition by a city or csunty of installation of newer mobilehomes (built since 1974) which are inz';alled on permanent foundations on lots zoned for single- family residence:. Alternatively, the locality may designate sites for mobilehumes.in single family zones, The local jurisdiction may apply setback, sideyard, parkins, and other development standards which it would apply to a conventional house on the same lot. Architecture standards may be applied to the mobilehome which deal specifically with roof overhang, and roofing and siding materials. Excerpts of the new law are attached. A number of questions have arisen regarding the proper interpretation of this lair. These questions, and the legal interpretation of the Department j of Housing and Community Development Follow. 1. Must mobilehomes meetins the standards of the b'11 be allowed on every of in sing e, ami y zones. Yes -- except that the locality may designate specific sites °:in single family zones for mob,lehome use as an alternative approach. However, the +cumber of single family rites excluded from use by Mobilehomes is limited by several considerations most importantly, housing, element requirements. The first sentence of the new law is a general.proscription against prohibiting mobilehomes (meeting the specified standards) on lots zoned for single family dwellings. However, the second sentence provides an alternative ati,r,oach: the city may designate lots zoned for single.family dwellings for mobilehome use, which lots are determined to be compatible for 4 mob °rlehome use. If a locality utilizes this approach and does designate singly family lots for mobilehome use, it. is not required to allow r mobilehomes on every lot zoned single family. The empirical basis for deti�rmininq the m --r lots designated for mobilehome use is in the '^ housin localit Y • y, jnt, StatuterY. requirements a local housing glement- 44hetl,er ' _for prepares ,rsuant to Government Code Section 65302(c) and the dousing Element Guidelines or the new Article 10.6, commencing with Section 45580, of the Government Coda (AB 2853) -- require a locality to consider mobilehomes and provide adequate sites with zoning to allow for mobilehomes. To the extent that there is a need for low and J moderate income housinn, and these needs are not being met through other housing the programsl, locality must zone an amount of residential land for mobilehomes commer-" ate with such need: ' furthermore, in order to withstand an equal q protest wn -� 'lenge (see ' questions 5 and 6 below) the locality should der,gnate 4r lots which are equally compatible for mobilehome use and be abI_ # to the .point characteristics which distinguish lots which were, "-'-' "need from those lots which were not. In practice, since all tots in ,..4 e ` l yenerclly be equally compatible for the placement of mobilr.h4mes,,,ct,i zP -mes should be added as an allowable use for an entire single Family ,asidential zone. 2. What 'does it Yiean that a locality may designate lots "which lots are- .tetermine to a do-rpati tt or such mobs a ome use's? The word "compatible" is not defined and, the.Ifare, the locality may exercise its own judgment; in determining compatibility. However, there must be a rational basis for this determination. In complying with this provision, the local jurisdiction should establish the c,atponents for a compatibility - standard and, prior to designating single family lots for mobilehome usp_ determine that the lots meet this standard. The` jurisdiction _ wish to make findings to this effect. AM Generally, sites will be compatible for mobilehome use if mobilehomes will meet the existing zoning and subdivision requirements. The f(,,ar that the placement of a mobilehome on a lot might have a negative economic effect on surrounding lots does not mean that it is an incompatible land use. Additional criteria that the city could consider in making the determination are probably limited to ar.hitectural and historical factors. The litmus test would be that the mobilehome would appear "tetall,v out of place ". Illustrative examples of mobilehome non- compatibility based on these cri_rl.; might be in -fill lots in an historic preservation area or an area composed of 7ictorian- styled structures. These situations invoke both of the criteria noted above. other older neighborhoods composed of large two -story residences, although containing a t•ariety of styles, might likewise be architecturally incompatible for mobilehomes. A word of caution, however. As the state of the art progresses, mobilehomes may be designed which will be totally compztiee, with Victorians or otber architectural types. "Plus, compatibility may be , 'uced'to simply meeting existing zoning and subdiv`sion requirements. This standard provides the necessary rational basis and is easy to apply. Since it also refl, =ts the subsequent requirement of the statute that the locality may subject the 2_ mobilehome to the same development standards that apply to a conventional single family dwelling, this standard would not,be subject to legal challenge. 3. Does the zonin for mobilehome parks or subdivisions comply with,, t e new aw. A locality may continue to zone for mobilehome parks or ,bdivisions, However, such zoning will meet. the requirements of the new statute only if conventional single family structures are also allowed in such zones. Where Such mobilehome 'park or subdivisions exclude conventional single family re�4zie s, the locality would still be required to allow mobilehomes in single ,z 'ly zones or designate lots in single family zones for mobilehomes. 4. What is the relationship between the new law and the Mobilehome FarKS Act With respect to use perml The Mobilehome Parks Act sits standards for the design and use of iobilehome parks and provides fo- state or local enforcement. Health and Safety Code Section 18300(g)(3) states that the provisions therein do not prevent a jurisdiction from requiring a use permit fo,^ a mobilehome which is installed outside of a mobilehome park. While SB 1960 did not expli^itly repeal Section 18300(8)(3), a local requirement of a use permit for a mobilehome in a single family residential zone is inconsistent with the new law. The first sentence of the new Ank statute precludes a locality from prohibiting mobilehomes on lots in single family zones. Requiring a use permit implies possible prohibition of the mobilehome use since the request for :a permit could be denied. Therefore,; sr;bsequent to the passage of 5B 1960, a use permit for a mobilehome should' not be required. This is likewise true if the locality opts for the alternative of designating single family lots for mobilehome use. Once the w; site has been designated, there is no need for a use permit. If the permit were granted, it would be superfluous; if the permit were denied, the locality would be in violation of the statute. With respect to conditional use permits, conditions relating to factors other than the act t at t e structure is a mobilehome can be required if 1 such conditions are likewise applied to conventional consti- ction. This is consistent with the express statement that mobilehomes may be subjected to the same 01velopment standards as are placed on conventional single family dwellings. 5. Does - the -new statute require a city or county to "spot zone "? x "Spot zoning" is the praciire of restricting.a small parcel as an "island" and giving it less rights than surrounding properties where no rational reason exists for such a restriction. The classification would be discriminatory, i.e., in violation of the equal protection clause. A property that is favored by allowing additional uses is not spot zoning since the property has not been discr�m�nated against. _3, .l _ The new law does not intend for localities to designate lots in single' family- zones - exclusively for, mobilehome use. Sites identified for . mobilehome use should be available for conventional construction as well. In effect, the permitted uses on the property have been expanded to include mobilehomes. The property has therefore been treated favorably by allowing' an additional use, and not discriminated against, , This is not spot zoning. 6.. Can the property owner whose single family lot is not zoned for mo a omen a ego tscriminatTOn. A property owner who wants to place a mobilehome on a lot where such use is prohibited, could arque that the pniperty has been discriminated against if otaer, similarly situated properties, were designated for mobilehome use. While a locality has a great dear of discretion in exercising its zoning authority, the judicial test for determining whether a zoning classification violates equal protection standards is as follows;, 1. The property owner challenging the regulation must demonstrate that his or her property stands in preciself the same relationship as those properties receiving preferential treatment (i.e., those where mobilehomes are an additional use); and -' 2. The more narrow zoning classification must not have been made on an arbitrary basis, but rather must be based 7-Yan some distinction which justifies the differential treatmsat. Meeting this standard should not be a problem for a locality in complying with the new law since this is the same standard that must be appli•td in traditional zoning practices. It simply means that the designation f sites for mobilehome use must have some rational basis. This basis will ptibab:, be the same as the locality's determination of compatibility. For example, if very narrow in -fill lots - in urban areas are rejected for mobilehome use as not "compatible" (because of the need for a larger lot), the rational basis test would be met. On the ether hand, in suburban residential areas where there is large lot zoning, there may be no basis for determining one lot is compatiole, another is not. In this situation, the most appropriate way to designate lots for mobilehome use may be th-, - Aaption of a mobilehome - overlay permitting mobilehnmes on all lots in the particular si.- e family zone. 7. Does the new law nu ?lify covenants, conditions and restrictions on- prop�rty w is pro i t s mo a omes. No. Restrictive covenants prohibiting mobilehomes on residential lots (entered into either before or after passage -e` the bill) are not directly affected by SB 1960. The crurts have upheld covenants restricting the use of property in the face of more expansive zoning requirements. (See Legislative Counsel Opinion No. 16044, 11/17/80, affirming this view.) However, the department has issued an opinion indicating that restrictive covenants proh iiting mobilehomes may be unenforceable and that SB 1960 adds additional support for this view. i, -4- Courts have refused to errorce restrictive covenants where, due to 'changed conditions ", it would be oppressive -and inequitable to the property owner to do so. For examp e,'this might-occur where a property is restricted to MP single gamily residential use and, over a period of years, the neighborhood has changed, from residential to commercial. Maintaining the lot tis resident ial no longer benefits surrounding properties (for whose protection the covenant was entered into in the first place) and imposes a hardship on the owner of the restricted property_. Rezoning of surrounding. areas to commercial is one of the factors nf' "changed conditions" that a court could consider in deciding whether or not to enforce the restriction. = By analogy, ' the rezoning of a "compatible" area to allow mobilehomes pursuant 'to SB 1960, could be a factor, used by a court to determine whether changed conditions render a restriction against mobilehomes unenforceable: The new law is also evidence that such restrictions are contrary to public policy, a factor to be considered by the court in_decioi6g whether a restriction should be enforced. Covenants prohibiting mobilehomes may also be narrowly interpreted by the courts to apply only to older mobilehomes rather than newer mobilehomes- -many of which are visually indistinouishar-l;e from conventionally - constructed' homes. This interpretation would be consistent with a general judicial rule to interpret su,:h restrictions in a manner which limits encumbrances on property.: department's legal opinion analyzing the en`orcability of these covenants is available upon request.] i 8. Does the new statute apply to charter cities and counties? Yet`. State zoning law only applies to general law cities and counties unless there is specific language applying the provision to charter jurisdictions. (See, for example, Government Code Sections 65864 and 65918.) The new law contains such a provision, explicitly applying it to charter cities and counties. 1 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM ONCA c��cnrwcNC9 Goo r p d F i Q z 1977 DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning. Commission FROM: Barry, K. Hogan, City Planner " BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner' SudJECT: COMMENTS ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' ABSTRACT: This Staff Report discusses the revisons to the Housing Element Ws a result of Hoy €sing and Community Development co►rnents. Planning Com- mission action should be tc review the proposed changes and forward them to the City Council for their adoption. BACKGROUND: The State Department of housing and Coma - ,unity Development recently completed their review of our Housing Element with many sugges- tions. Paramount in their suggestions are C13 to clearly efine the ex- isting and future housing needs of the community; aid (2) to spell out in y ill use to strive to meet the identified detail, progrems which the City w g it is important tC,note that ir, considering thesq housing detain needs. T needs, the state is looking fora ''good faith, diligent effort ".in per- formance toward satisfying our goals, I The housing needs were estimated in the Technical Appendix and have been incorporated into the General Plan document. Attached to this rgp�rt is an insert to page 73 of the General Plan. This revision tabulates the existing housing needs for low acid moderate income households based upon state and federal reguiatiorr how much a typ;cal household should ,defining pay for housing cost. An additional component to estimating our housing needs is a projection of what Vf2 future household demand will likely be. Using a goal of 30 pprcen't "capture rate" of 'locally employed, approximately 6,000 new households should be generated during the next five years. An es- timate has been provided based upon 'current income distribution tb` determine the future demand in each income category. This Information will be further refined once the detailed 1980 Census data is available., Revisions have been made to the "Objectives, Policies, and Programs" starting on page 73 of the General Plan to more clearly define what programs the City would "usc- or study over the next three years. Each program is listed under the category of "Policy" and reviewed through the following topics: Anti- cipated Iwpact, Responsible Agency, Financing, and Schedule._ A substantial 1 Planning Commissf ,)d March 11, 1981 Page 2 portion of the purposed programs are based upon the City's ability of obtaining funding approval. This is always noted in the program description and is also noted as an introduction to the programs themselves. All thz programs listed are based upon the Revised Housing Element which.the Planning Commission has already adopted. Some programs are to be studied further and others are to be _ implcmented w;fhin a stated time frame. RECOMMENDATION: It is recoimmended that the Planning Commission consider and review the revisions to the He=ising Elemer;t to the Draft General Plan and adopt the attached Resolution recommending to the City Council inclusion of the attachments in the City's Housing Element: Respectful y s bmitted, ARRY� H GA ity annr% BKG:TJB:jr Attachments: Revisions to the Housing Element Resolution of Approval t.. •I CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G ICnnip MEMORANDUM "c9 Q - O �7 U a 1277 DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: Members of the Pl�.nning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City 'Planner BY: Steve McCutchan, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF AB 2853 (ROOS) ABSTRACT: Recent legislation, AB 2853, has changed the requirements of local housing elements. The changes are anticipated to have minimal im- pact on the City's housing program. BACKGROUND: In general, what Chan es to the requirements for a Housing Element have occurred due to passage and enactment of AB 2853 (Roos)? AB 2853, enacted into late January 1,1981, establishes extensive require- ments for the Housing Element of the Genera i'Plan. The legislation mod- ifies existing law by clarifying what i, -'to be included in housing ele- ments and establishing procedures a-nd deadlines for their adeption. The basic' requirements for hous'irg elemefts remain unchanged by AB 2853. Former law required that housing elements comprise "standards a :,d plans for the improvement of housing and for provision of adequate sites for housing" and that they "make adequate provision for the housing .needs of all economic segments of the community ". The details of this require - ment were defined in the "Housing Element Guidelines" adopted as regu- lations by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). There had been considerable debate on whether these Guidelines constitute an interpretation of the Statutory requirements Which are binding upon cities and counties. AB 2853 settles this question by making the Guidelines advisory. Most importantly, AB 2853 puts into statutory form much of what was formerly in the Guidelines. Thus, while the Guidelines will be ad- visory, the statute itself now provides a level of specificity com- oarabie to that formerly orovided onl'v in the Guidelines. f Planning Commission March 11, 1981 Page 2 What procedural requirements have been enacted? Existing law provides that HCD may review local housing elements for con- formity with the requirements of the law and guidelines. AB 2853 mandates HCD review of draft elements and reaffirms discreati�)nary authority to re- view adopted elements. Tir:.e frames of 90 days or 45 days have been estab- lished for HCD review of complete e?ements,or amr:ndments, respectively. Comments that are made by HCD are advisory,`but AB 2853 requires that local decisionmakers consider the rommerts in tdking a& ion on the element. We are required to have an 9dequate Housing Eleri_ant adopted by October 1, 1981, under the requirements of AB 2853. Staff is currently engaged preparing an amended Housing Element in response to HCD's comments, What substantive differences in the intent of Housing Elements have occurred with AB 2853? The primary difference occurred in the area of bro-idening the scone of the identification of housing needs. The Guidelines centered needs analysis on a local agency's "fair share allocatina", the amount of low income per - sons that the locality would need to provide affordable housing for now and in the future. AB 2853 expands the discussion to the development of the Aft local share of the regional housing need for low, moderate, and above mod- erate persons. This is to be done by allocating a state total to the various regional planning agencies, in our case SCAG, and then the regional agency reallocating its total to the cities and counties. A revision process "based upon available date and accepted planning methodology, and supported by ade- quate documentation" has also been included whereby local agencies may, through their own informa';ion, request a change to their allocation if it is believed to be unreprelentative or irequitable. For effect, the fair share allocation has been Included, but AB 2853 requires a broader look at other economic segment needs. Other areas of change include an expanded needs analysis section which in- cludes areas such as an analysis of household characteristics, a land in- ventory of suitable residential development, and an analysis of the needs of special housing, an analysis of energy conservation opportunities, and a statement of a community's goals and objectives toward the condition,. improvement, and development of housing. -he third, and prob_bly the post important part of the Housing Element, is what AB' 2853 calls the "housing program which must be "a five -year schedule of actions a local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to im- plement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element through the administration of land use and development controls, provision of regulatory concessions, and incentives, and the utilization of appropriate federal and state financing and subsidy programs when avail - able ". i, Planning 'Commission March 11 1981 Adk Page 3 To be included within the housing program must be five areas of discussion: a. Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appro .riate zoning and development standards and with public services and ='acilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including rental housing, factory -built housing and mobilehomes, in order to meet the community's housing goals. b. Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low- and moderate- income h,useholds. c. Address and, inhere applicable and legally possible, remove govern- mental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. d. Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable housing stock. e. Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, or color. What immediate changes, if any, might be necessary for the City to coaiply__ Lin with AB 2853y The Housing Element, which Sedway /Cooke developed and was subsequently ­Mended by the Planning Commission, was written in compliance with the 077 guidelines with the approval of HCD. The document was transmitted - to HCD and the comments were received within the past week. Staff is cur- rently reviewing HCD's comments and believes that only minimal changes will be necessary to comply with HCD's recottmendations. When the City receives the 1930 Census reports, amendments can be made to the element which will update the information and analysis in the needs analysis section. Due to the fact That previous demographic data has nut beet, as thorough as that provided, in a decennial census, the information and analysis in the Housng Element shouts be updated. SUMMARY: Thee State found that changes were necessary in the development of housing elements by local governments due to misunderstandings of what was advisory in relation, to the authority of HCD or the Cuidelines. The enactment of AB 2853 clarifies that the Guidelines are advisory, but sup- plements this more with incorporation of much of the Guidelines as law. AIRL l Planning Commission March 11, 1981 ; Page 4 The new law centers primarily around greater analysis of needs and more commitment at the local level to solve local housing problems. The City has been actively pursuing the development of a Housing Element and pro - gr,m which is in keeping with the spirit of new legislation. Respectfully submitted, ARRY ' HOGAI City Tanner BKh: SM: J r jPlanning Commission March 11, 1981 Ah NUMERICAL HOUSING`GOALS: (Insert on page 73 before definition of Affordable Housing) The current existing low income housing reeds in Rancho Cucamonga is 3,495 plus the fair share allocation of 336 units, totaling 3,831 units as the low income housing need. The existing modeHate income housing need is 2,748. The SCAG. regional formula for local jurisdictions suggests that, realistically, cities should strive to meet 3% of the current housing need per year. Thus, 3% of low income housing need is 115 units per year and moderate income "housing need is 82 units per year. An important policy and objective for Rancho Cucamonga is to provide adequate housing for future local employment. The Housing Element suggests a range of between 10% and 10% of local employment to be housed in Rancho Cucamonga. An objective of the Housing Element is to provide for a "capture" of 30% of the local employment, thus assuring meeting the local housing need and providing for greater energy effeciency. To estimate the future housir- geed, a general - ized income distribution of future emploagnent was projected based upon try most current income range within Rancho Cucamonga. Table III -5(A) indicates the pro - jected new households by income distribu, ion during a 5 year period based upon a low capture rate (10 %) of 3300 units and a high capture rate (30 %) of 6,000 units. TABLE III 5(A) PROJECTED NEW HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME DISTRIBUTION 1980 -85 Low CapturP Rate High Capture Rate 10% 30% 1980 -85 Per Year 1980 -84 Per Year Low Income (0 -80% Median) 1320 264 2400 480 Moderate InrPme C80 -12u% MedJ 924 185 1680 336 Above Moderate ( 7120% Median) 1056 211 1920 384 TOTAL 3300 660 6000 1200 Based upon the goal to strive for 305 capture rate to house the locally employed through the next five years, approximately 6,000 new units would be necessary. The demand of those units would consist of 2400 units within the income category of up to 80% median income, 1680 housing units between 80% and 120% of median in- come and 1920 households would be above 120% of median income. OBJECTIVE:.', POLICIES AND PROGRAMS (To be inserted starting on Page 73 of the General Plan) The objectives, policies, and progi ..,ns enumerated below shall guide thin City's efforts for decent, affordable housing and encouragement of a variety of housing types. In order to move towards attaining the housing goals and objectives, the City must commit itself to specific policies and programs. The policies listed. below are organized into six issue areas; Adequate Supply, Affordable Housing, Preserving Housing and Neighborhoods, Special Needs, Rowing Types, and Energy Effecient Building. The programs lasted below are discuss ,,�19 by the action which is intenoed to occur, the anti:cpated results, the responsible agency, financing and time frame for completion. Any program discussed below which requires participation at a non -local level would be subject to the approval at the funding source. For example, several programs indicate funding from Community Development Block Grant program as an Entitleme., City. This source of funding has not yet been assured and would likely be available only after June '3982. L. ADEQUATE SUPPLY: OBJECTIVES,- Zbcourage dQvelopment of an''adequate supply of housing to meet the housing J needs of a reasonable portion of per- sons working in the C=ty and the region who wish to live in the City. POLICIES 0 The City should provide adequate housing for persons employed in the proposed in- dustrial area and regional shopping center. It is the City's goa? -to encourage the lo- cation of housing for a0 percent of all em- ployees in the industrial area and 40- 50'par- cent of those employed in the regional shop- ping center and local retail commercial ac- tivities. o Although the City is largely undereloped,at present, the surge of employeez�,seeking hou- sing as the industrial and comm% 162 centers develop will generate a need fur housing. In order to prevent a situation where workers cannot find nearby housing and must therefore commufi.?,3onger distances„ the city shall en Planning Commission Housing Element Revision Mar h 11, 1981 Page 2 0 The City sl- ad encourage a balanced supply of rental and ownership horsing affordable to low and moderate income households. 0 Affordable units should be located and designer : so that they are compatible with their surroundings, are within walking distance of jobs, shopping, community facilities, or transit stops. 0 T1 .:ity shah encourage the dispersal c. affordable housing units throughout the communtiy, such that they satisfy the widest possible range of housing location choice and needs. I.a. ACTIGN: The- t =„ shall establish a development monitoring program which reviews progress Mote. _.:; meeting housing goals. Further discussion of this program is o page 89 of t" General Plan. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Both residential and non= isidential development will be monitored by the Community Development Department. A report shall be brought back to the City Council at least once _a year reviewing the progress that has been made towards satisfying the City's housing goals. At that time, the City Counril should review the effective implementation of housing programs. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: CoG�tanity Development Department FINANCING: Community Development Budget i98i and Community Development Block Grant 1982 and beyond. Subject to "Entitlement" designation. '1 SCHEDULE: Or,- _:ing I.b. ACTION: Adoption of a Zoning- Ordinarce and map which provides for the imple- mentation of the land use plan. The land use plan provides for an expanded housing supply and promotes lower cost housing by permitting greater varia- tion of housing types and densities. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: The rezone of undeveloped lands for residential develop-: ment. The following is :� summary of residential lands available for rezone and approximate number o-L potential newly constructed units. Planning Commission Housing Element Revisions March 11, 1 '81 AM Paste 3 Approx. AC # of Units Low Medium Residential 1403 4`209 (2 -4 du /ac) Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) 899 5845 Medium liigh•;Residential (14 -24 ,du/ac) 224 4256 Hi h Residential ?24 -30 du /ac) 138 3726 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Community Deveiopm tt Department FINANCING: Community Development Departmnt Budget SCHEDULE: 1981 -82 I.C. ACTION: Inventory and pursue unused, suri�lus land owned by other governmental entities for possible building sites for affordable housing. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: Make sites availabit for production of affordable housin. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department FINANCING: Community Development Block Graft funds, subject to "Entitlement" designation. SCHEDULE: 1982 -84 I.d. ACTION: Require buiiders to file with the :City, announcements of housing unit for sale or rent thirty (30) days before offering the plaits to the general. pub, lic. Thesr announcements will be posted in places of'1bcal° mD1o_ym_At- ANTICIPATED IMPAC "iS: Creating an opportunity for purchasing of housing by a local labor force. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development D ?partment is i FINANCING: Community Development Departmen+ Budget SCHEDULE: 'On -going L i Planning Commission Housing Element Revisions March 11, 1981 Page 4 T.e. ACTION The*City shall implement an ordinance regarding the conversion, of apartment units.to condominiums which limits the amount the conversion of apartment units to no more than one -half the number of multiple family rental dwellings added to the housing stock during the preceding year. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Assure the maintenance of an adequate supply of multiple family rental units. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department FINANCING: CommuW Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: On -going II. AFFORDABLE 12OUSING: OBJECTIVE Enrrourag housing opportunities w: ch are within the financial capabilities of low and anderate- income persons and families. POLICY: 0 The City should develop programs to in- crease the affordability of the existing housing stock, especially low and rate cost units. In order to ensure at low and moderate income households will `continue to enjoy affordable housing, the City shall do the following;- ctions to increase affordabiltiy. II.a, ACTION: Use mortgage revenue bonds for -,chase of existing and new affordable e housing stock for low and moderate incua., : useholds. s ANTICIPATED IMPACT': The purchase of housing by :low and moderate income households with current commitment by San Bernardino County Office of Community Development . for tie mortgage revenue bond during 1381 is 2.2 Million Dollars `or'approxirritely 10 two bedroom, 10 one bedroom_, and 30 studio units. The City wit monitor further t revenue bond opportunities and pursue those which are feasible. RESPONSTBLE AGENCY: San Bernardino Ccunty Office of Community Development and Rancho t,licamonga Community Development Department. FINANCING: San Bernardino County Revenue Bonds SCHEDULE: On -goino tit v Planning Commission Housina Elisent Revisions March fl, 1981 Page 8 II.b. ACTION: Investigate the feasibility of encouraging affordable housing through establishing a "share a 'house" program which would bring compatible people to- gether; ANTICIPATES IMPACT: If 5P?Able, q "-h a, program would provide opportunities for househo d5 ;,o affnrd housing which individually they could not. RESPONSIBLE AGENGY: Community Development, department FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: 1981 -82 POLICY 6 Tha City s�,,-uld increase the supply of low and .moderate cost :noosing. This policy a_lrsses the need to expand the housing stock affordable to low and mod- erate income households. In order to im- plement this; policy, the City should con- Sider the following actions to increase zhe housing supply. II.c. ACTION: Through Growth Ma,iagement assessment process, provide incentive for n w afford able housing. Incentive is a point rating value for those projects which provide affordable housing of 25 percent or more units w-:.hin project. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: To encourage the production of afforrable housing. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Devele -tent Department - FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: On -going `^ II.d. ACTION: Study the feasibility of implementation of in sionary ordinance to provide at least 15 percent of new housing units for loin and moderate income households. Further discussion is on 'page 88. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: If feasible, such a program may provide for production of affordable housing. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Deraloament Department FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget ` ANL SCHEDULE: 1981.82 y Planning'temmission` Housing Element Revisions Marcie 11, 1931 Page 6 II.e. ACTION: Study the feasibility of a redevelopment agency. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: If found feasitle, such agency erald be used to provide for the production of affordable housing and rehabilitation r.f substandard housing. RESPONIIBs_E AGENCY: Community Development Department 4 FINANCING: Community �,svplopment Department Budget and Agency Revenues SCHEDULE 1981 -�82, ii.f. ACTION: Use portion of Community Development Blo ^k Grant funds to reduce pric of land for cc- astruction of low income housing. Pragramoptions could include ptrcnase of land to sell back to developers of low income housing at a reduced rate for pro- viding the off -site improvements. "CIPATED IMPACT: The production of Wising for low income households. btSPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community ,Development`9epartmeet FINANCING: Community Detfelor,2nt Block Grant pending approval of "Entitlement " - designation, SCHEDULE: 1982 -84 POLICY o The City shall implement programs which assist lcw- and moderate- income families, the elderly, handicapped persons, large families end minorities in renting and buying existing housing. II.g. ACTION : _Monitor mortgage insurance programs available and where - applicable utilize such programs.to reduce housing costs and to provide rental assistance. Such programs include Section 207 and Section 221 4(3r and (4). ANTICIPATED IMPACT: To provide affordable rental housing to low income households. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department FINANCItiG: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development SCHEDULE: On -going Planning Commission Housing Eiemen,: Revisions March 11 1981 Page 7 IL.h• ACTION: Participate in Section 8 Public Housing Income Rental Assistance Programs for existing and new constructed units. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Currently, San Bernardino County Housing Authority czn provide assistance , for up to 20 units per year in the City, subject to Depart- men'. of Housing and Urban Development approval and eevelopers /landowners interest. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: San Bernardino Cor_,Cy Housing Authority FINANCING: Department of .-Housing and Urban Development and San Bernardino Housing Authority: SCHEDULE: '981-82 r _., IIJ , ACTION: Make an application to the California Department of Financing Agency CHFA to become a "designated" city. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: This wiil allow residents to become eligible for California Department of Financing Agency home ownerFhip /home improvement program prov'ding below market rate interest loans for home i..irchase and home improvement to low and moderate income households. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: California Department of Financing Agency FI:\ANCING California Department of Financing Pgency Revenue Bonds SCHEDULE: '1981 -82. Ii.j. ACTION: Establish a housing information program managed by a housing coordi- nator which will provide publicity a+ld technical assistance regarding rental assistance programs and Name owner:f,ip; programs for'low income and moderate income households. Further di- tussion is on page 90, ANTICIPATED IMPAC; Greater public awareness and participation In housing pro k" grams. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY Community Development Department ''. FINANCING: Community Developmept Block Grant, pending, Entitlement designation. SCHEDULE: 1982 and beyond �f Planning CQmission Housing Element Reyisions March 11, 1981' Re9e 8 AM II.k. ACTION: Investigate feasibility of participation in mortgage insurance program for homeownership by low /moderate income households. Such programs will in- clude Section 221 d (2) and Section 235 and Section 237. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: If feasible seek participatian in those programs for funding the purchase of housin6 by low and moderate inetviR households. t RESPONSIBLE AGENCY bepartment.of Hou ing and Urban Development FINANCING: Department of Housing and Urban Development SCHEDULE: 1981-82 "RESERVING HOUR "!S AND NEIGHBORHOODS: - III. OBJECTIVE: Promote programs which are designed to ma= ^fain and _reserve the .existing housing stools and rgmmunity identity of existing e neighborhoods. r POLICY o The City shall promote programs to ehab- i.litate deteriorated housing units_ The housing condition survey conducted for this element will provide the basis .for establish Ina target areas and the extent of their deterioration;. The following programs shall be used to improve standard housing Units, III.a. ACTION: Allocate Community Development Block Grant funds for rehabilitation of up to 15 substandard housing units per year through the use of low interest loans! grants for low income households ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Rehabilitation of up to 15 units per year. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department FINANCING: Community Development Blr k Grant Funds, pending "Entitlement" de igoation. SCHEDULE: 1982 -84 l.� Planning Commission Housing Element Reyisons March 11, 1981 Page 9 E III.b. ACTION: Determining the feasibility of urban homesteading for abandoned and i. delapidated units. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: If found feasible, tie programs would provide an op;x,)rtunity` for families to purchase abandoned homes at a :reduced amount and make repies.to brin; buildings up to code and after a' minimal period of time receive title to ownership. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department and Mortgage Company FINANCING: Community Development Budget SCH! DOLE: 1981 -82 POLICIES- 0 The City shall encourage the protection of existing residential noighborhoods from substantial changes in life style -znd nei,?arothood character. 0 The City should promote the conservation and maintenance of the City's sound housing stock through the following programs. III.c. ACTION. Determine feasibility of use of Section 312, Rehabilitation Loans. [ ANTICIPATED IMPACT_ If feasible, seek participation in Section 312, Rehabilitation Loans -. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department and UC -S.- Department of Housing and Urban Development FINANCING: Community Development Block Grant Funds, pending "Entitlement" desig nation and rehabilitation funds,, U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development'. SCHEDULE. 1982 -84 III.d. ACTION: investigate the use of redevelopment agency to carry out rehabilitation program of neighborhoods and individual homes. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: If found feasible, pursue establishment of redevelopment agency. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:, Community Development Department i FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: 1981 =32 fi III.e. Planning Commission Housing Element Revisions March 11, 1981 Pa a 10 9 .i ACTION: Encourage use of California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) tax exempt Revenue Bonds for direct loan ,program for housing rehabilitation. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Participation by homeowners will provide low interest loans fog• re a i nation. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department and California. Housing Finance Agency. FINANCING: Community Development Department, Rehabilitation Loans, California Housing Finance Ager,.y, SCHEDULE: 1981 -82 I;'- SPECIAL NEEDS: OBJECTIVE Promote programs which meet the special housing needs of the elderly, handicapped or ,minority groups. The City should provide technical assis- tance and counciling to the elderly, handi- capped and minority households needin ift . housing. in particular, the following actions shall be taken. IV.a. ACTION: Seek funding from Section 8, Rentai Assistance,, Section 202 (Direct Loans for the Elderly) and Community Development Block Grant. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Home ownershp or rental assistanct to elderly and handicapped Housing assistnace plan has goal objective of 33 units. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. FINANCIN3: Community Development Budget and Housing and Wban Development SCHEDULE: 1981 -82 IV.b. ACTION: Investigate feasibility for special criteria to provide reduced parking requirements for new housing projects. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: If found feasible, she policy would provide for reduced on site costs for developer of elderly housing resulting in lower cost units. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department Aft FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: 19$1482 �i k r Planning Commission Housing Element Revisions March 11, 1981 Page 11 i P IV.c. ACTION: Encourage use of California. Housing finance Agency (CHFA) home owner- ship/ho e improvement program, and other home ownershin- programs. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Provisiou5 for encouraging affordable housing for minority, elderly, and impacted areas. - RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department and funding agencies. FINANCING: Administration and Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: On- going IV.d. ACTION: Establish housing information program that has a coordinator to assist the elderly, handicapped, minorities in pursuit of affordable housing. ANTICI.paTED IMPACT: To make available affordable hous %ng known to special need households. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department qW FINANCING: Community Development Block Grant funds, pending "Entitlement" de- signation SCHEDULE: 1982 -84 V. MOUSING TYPES: OBJECTIVE Encourage aP broader range of housing types, in terms of cost, construction methods and design. POLICY 0 The City shall work wsth developers and the local Building Industry Association to pro - mote the use of innovative housin ^;techniques and development with 'a variety of'housing ' Hypes. The ru2lowing actions shall be imple- mented to further this policy. V.a. ACTION: Develop mobilehome ordinance which would provide for the implementation of ­SB 1960 added to Government Code Section 65852.3. This law requires Cities to provide for Housing and Urban Development approved mobilehomes (or, foundation systems) in single family zo es. Refer to page 89 for further discussion.' ANTICIPATED IMPACT Adopted ordinance will allow for siting of mobilehomes in single family zones, thus providing t;:e opportunity for reduced building cysts. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY; Community Development Department a. Planning Commission Housing Element Relits.ions March 11, 1981 Page 12 Ask Jr FINANCING-. Community Development Department SCHEDULE: 1981 IV.b. ACTION: Encourage the use of different types of development arrangements including mobilehomes, modular communities, subdivisions, condominiums, and planned develop meats. Table III -6 identifies Various 'potential housing types. ' Other housing types may be considered during the'review. Illustrative examples of housing types are provided ot',figure. III -4. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Creating the opportunity for a variety of housing types with the potential of- reduced building costs. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department I FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: On -going IV.c. ACTION: Encourage manufacturers and developers to participate in the de-zlopm of innovative and _cost saving housing design techniques. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Reduction of building costs. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: On- going VI, ENERGY :EFFECIENT BUILDING: OBJECTIVE Promote eneray efficiency in all resi- dental developments. w POLICY 0 The City should encourage the use of energy lzfficient building design, site p.?ahning and community layout in all re- si3ential iieve_ "obments. In order to im- plement this policy, the following a.-;tions in addition to the guidelines and stan- dards identified in "Community Design" ant "Energy", shall be implemented. Amok s_ Planning Comilssion Housing Element Reyis•: -,%ns- March 11, 1981 Page 13 VI.a. ACTION: Amend local building codes and zoning ordinance in accordance with guidelines established in Housing Element of tl =a General Plan. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: The construction of housing which would have more energy efficiency. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department FINANCING Community Devel'4ment Department: Budget SCHEDULE: 1981 -82 VI.b. ACTION Consider the feasibility of an enerv}, conservation ordinance for retro- fitting existing housing. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Overall impact is to i�arease the energy efficiency of ex F isting housing stock. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULE: 1982 -33 VI.c. ACTION: Establish energy information program which would provide for publicity and individual consultatbn. See further program description in Ene gy Conserva -' tion :dement of this plan. , ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Greater public awareness and participation in the energy conservation program. € RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community Development Department FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget SCHEDULEt 1981 -82 ` VI.d. ACTION: Establish an energy monitoring program in cooperation with local utility ,._ companies. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: Greater energy conservation awa;•eness'by local residents to provide for Rancho Cucamonga energy conservation implementation. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY Community Development Department and Local Utilities s- planning Commission Housing Element Revisicns March 11, 1581 Page 14 r r FINANCING: Community Development -- "apartment Budget and Local Utilities SCHEDULE: 1981 -82 VI.e. ACTIt1N: Seek cooperation With local utility companies for low interest loans for energy conservation, programs. ANTICIPATED IMPACT_:_ Greater public participation in instilling energy conser- vation methods in homes thus reducing cost on energy. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Community G..elopnent Department and Local Utilities FINANCING: Community Development Department Budget and Local Utilities I SCHEDULE: 1981 -82 r �g �r 4 k R t LL� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LAN N IN G COMMISSION OF P THE CITY OF RANCHO C((CAMONGA APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT. WHEREAS, the City o'' Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission did consider and approve Resolution No. 81 ;13, a Draft Housing Element to the draft General plan on February 17, 1981; and WHEREAS, that Draft Housing Element was reviewed by the State Office of Housing and Community Development; and I:HEREAS, the.State Office of Housing avid Community Development did have comments to be considered by the City in their adoption of the Housing El eir. tnt; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did consider at a public hearing these comments, NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga PTanning Commission does rev ~se the Draft Housing Element as shown in Exhibits "A" and "B ", and recommends to the City Council 0,tie adcatien of the Housing Element, as revised. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IITH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. , PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 BY Richard Dahl, Chairman, ATTESTS Secretary of the Planning.CMmmiss _ I, JACK LAM, Secretary r:f the PTanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by she Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hald on the lith day of March, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: �c NOES: COMMISSIONERSS ABSENTt COMMISSIONERSc f rdye 4 E. Upon receiving testimony at the public hearing, the Council shall announce its decision on the proposed street name change by Resolution. 'The Council may approve, conc;3tionai7y approve, or deny the street name change pursuant to the findings in Section 8 of this Resolution. F it >pproved, the Resolution shall include the date upon which said change will become effective. This decision shall be final. Sixty (6-3 days prior to the eff- tine date of change,. the City Clerk shall send wrictr -,•, )tice of the change to the Post Gf' ce, County Rs,tor^ 'ire District and Sheriff's Department-. SECTION 5,*- i=INDINGS Street names may be_ changed pursuant to the fol mlirty: A. That the proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan. } B. That the proposed change is consistent with t*,- adopted Master plan of Streets and Highways or adopted Circulation Element. t C. That the propused cha:ge will not cause significant adverse impacts upon';ne environment. D. That the proposed change is �ie�jrid necessary to protect Cthe public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. } SECTION 6 - SEVERABILITY The invalidity of any word, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part of provisions of the Resolution shall not affect the validity of any other part of the Resolution wh „ch can be given effect without such invalid part or parts. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF_, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CJ?CAMONGA F BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman J+ j ATTEST' Secretary of the Planning Commission . r, t _ „p SECTION 3 - CHANGING OF STREET NAMES A. 'fhe changing of ;street names may be initiated by any. of . the following: I, Public request which must be in writing to the City Council stating the justification for, such a change. 2. Resolution of Intention of the Planning Commission. 3. Resolution of b tention of the City, Council. B. If change is initiated through public request, the City may require the applicant to pay all costs incurred by the change (includintl but not limited to street signs, pub`;c hearing•notificaiion, etc.). C. In all cases, it shall be the duty of tale Planning Division, , to prepare a report discussing the justification for such a change, recommending a replacement name and discussing the impact of the proposed change. SECTION 4 - STREET NAME CHANGE PROCESS A. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall place the matter on the first available Planning Commission Agenda, and shall submit the report to the Planning Division at that time R. The :lane ng Commission shall hold a public hearing on the proposed street name change. Said public hearing shall be noticed to all property owners on the street proposed for change by mail ten (10) days prior to the hearing, or by the posting of a aotice'along the street at 300 foot intervals, ten (ID) days prior to the hearing. The Post Office, County_ Recorder, Fire District anJ Sheriff's Department shall also be sent written notice or the proposed change. C. The Planning Comissioj may, recommend approval, conditional approval, or denial to the Council by Resolution pursuant to the findings in Section 3 of this Resolution. D. Upon receipt of the Commission's' Resolution, the C1t,� Clerk shall enter the matter on the next available Council Agenda. The Council shall hold a public hearing. Said hearing shall be noticed in -6b manner outlined above, l I aye r H. That street desicnation for present and future streets shall be as follcws: Boulevard Sliecial East -crest Streets to be, named Boulevards. W �I 2. Streets Ens} -west streets to be named Streets 3. Avenues North -south streets to be named Avenu s. ill 4. Road Any diagonal, street which does not co4orm l tasically to grid to be known as ROAD'.. ll 5, Jriv2 East -west streets parallel to, but ll� between named avenues, to be called WIVES. l 6. Place lbrth -south streets, parallel to, l+ut between named streets„ to be calls d j I !LACES. i 7. Way ,Inu irregular street which cannot con'orm j o °any grid to be known as WAY. 8. II Court ij cul-de.sa4 or dead -end street with i'urn- around which cannot be reasonabl; extended to carry the name of the pre;eding street. - C or A'cul -de -sac which serves not more thin s wen (7) lots shall carry the same n;''me I a6 the street serving it. 9. LOOP A street which originates and terminwas 11 ot� same common base street shall be designated as" a LOOP (East /West or North /South) street and named to indicate the samet 111 \ common base street. 10. Frontage Frontage roads shall carry the same Road naae as the street or avenue served and; shall not be identified otherwise SECTION 2 - MCEOURE A. It is the responsibility of the applicant for develol rent resulting in the construction of new streets to subm t names to the City for approval. B. The City Planner o^ his des-''gnee shall approve all I street names in th.� City of Rancho Cucamonga. I 1 { RESOLUTION NO. ;! A IIESOLUTION OF -THE PLANNING. COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF %ANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING 'A STREET NAMING POLICY. WHEREAS, it is necessary �o establish a street naming policy for new public apd private streets in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the interest of uniformity and to avoid confusion to the public; and ._. WHEREAS; it is desirable to establish a policy for changing existing street names in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; SECTION', 1 - STREET NAMES A. Thai. street names should be pleasant sounding, appropriate, easy to read (so that the public, and children in particular, _ can handle the name in an emergency situation), and should add to the pride of home ownership and community. B. That the following types of street names are unacceptable: numerical names (lst, 2nd, etc.); alphabetical letters (A, B, •�, etc.' frivolous, complicated or undesirable names; unconventional spelling; compound names; given or surnames of persons living or dead (Pinneer families, historic persons, etc., excluded). C. Thzt streets ihich are continuous shall be extended in accordance with the present street names wherever possible and feasible. D. That discontinuous streets shall not be given the same name. E. Ti,at duplication of existing or proposed street names is prohibi,,2d. Similar sounding names are considered to be duplication, ,egardless of spelling: F. That in existing areas of the City, new street names shall not contr.,dict the prevailing theme of north /south streets named after gems and east /west streets named 'f after trees when possible and where feasible. :. G. That streets with a 90 degree or more change of direction shall change names ar a convenient and appropriate point :�s determined by the City Planner. - r a --- CITY OF RANCHO CLT AMONGA �OGVCAkC�c7 KMT "TORT 0 O Z 1977 DATE: March 11, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Plannf SUBJE,1T: STREET NAMING RESOLUTION ABSTRACT: Attached, please find a copy of the revis €:d Street Naming R se ution as reviewed y the Street Naming Committee composed of Chairman Dahl and Connisstoner Rempel. Recomigendation of approval to the City Council is recon..,ended. DISCUSSION: The Street Naming Resolution, attLched, has been developed through ci copulation of various Street Naming Ordinances from-various cities. The Resolution sets forth standards for the naming of streets and for the attachment of suffixes to the streets, such as Avenue, Boulevard, Road, etc. It also indicates what the city is not desirous of having streets named. The Resolution is a fairly standard document and will allow us to improve the street naming within t ".e City of Rancho Cucamonga. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission recrend adoption of thr:attached'Resolution to th:'a City Council. Respectfu omitted, 1 • fl?r B rry/ H 'ga ity' anner KH. p L ITEM N RESOLUTION NO, 81 -17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM!�iISSION OF THF'` ` CXTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONI'k,, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIaNAL +Y s "PPROVING'TENT!TIVE Rr,CT MAP N0, 11549. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Man No, 11549, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the 'purpose of subdividing the :eal property situated-in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Be 'nardino, S#�te of California, described as a residential subdivision of 52 acres iotated on the southwest corner of Summit and 'East Avenues into 90 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission i`or public hearing and action on Mara 11, 1981; and WHERZEAS, the City Planner has recommended apprc al of the Map ' subject to all curditions' set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS,, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Em ineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered othe, evi0nce presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREF -'GRE, the Planning Commission of the City of `tanchn Cucamonga does resolve as fo;ljws: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the fallowing findings in regard tb Tentative Tract No. 11549`and the Map .hereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all = plicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The 4esign or improvements of the tentative tract is ,pnsistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; � (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of devel opgient proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (_) The tentative tract is not liaely to cause serious: - public health problems;; a , (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any eaeement acquired by the public at large, now rf record,,, for access through or use of the property within ! the proposed subdivision. '( y r Resolution Pao. D i , f Page 2 (g) That this �'roject will not create adverse impacts on the environment and`ra NPgative Declaration is issued. SECTION Tentative Trat;t Map No. 11549, a copy of which is attache(! hereto. is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions ac,a the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING D.I,VISION 1. The Garcia House shall be preserved by relocation to another sitt+•at the Expense of the develcper. The developer',shall workmith the Director of Community Services and the C�,,,dy Historic Commission to find an appropriate locations. 2. A detailed plan indicating wi,;+ch trees are needed to be remiived and where hey windrows shall be! planted, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to final a;)prr el of mag, The developer shall be responsible for pianti' y new windrows where deemed appropriate by the City.rlanner. 3. The Palm trees near the Garcia House shall be relocated to the Etiwanda Avenue: frontage by the developer. This shall be shown on the 0tafled tree plan. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Erosion protection measles at the end of Ash Avenue shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A letter from the downstream property owners agreeUg to accept drainage runoff from Ash Avenue shall be required 5. Complete hydrology study shall be submitted tc the City to review the drainages impact on,Summit, Etiwa(rda and East Avenue. 6. Construction of East Avenue improvements for the tract` shall be coordinated with the construction of east side of East Avenue at the intersection wi;.h Summit Avenue which is a condition of approval for Parcel Map 5441. iI 7. Existing damaged rock curb anu gutter on Etiwana Avenue ! shall be repaired with similar type materials to the' satisfaction of the City Enginenr. ` ,8. Dedication by separate instrument of that port -4an of Cassia Street outside of tract boundary shall be required concurrent with the ,pcordation of the final map. 1 Resolutioit No. 81 -17 Pag.: 3 g. All existing easements lying within the future right-of- way are to be o1it claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 10. Final plans and profiled shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 11. Concenti•a ed drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under si,iewalk drains shall be inst fled to City stsndards. 12. Existing City road requiring reconstru °tion, shall h�eitain open for traffic at all times with adequate detout�s durinc actual construction. ;A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost o' the grading and paving prior to rec_­:dation of the tract map. On completion of the gra0lrJ and paving,, to the satisfaction of the City Enginear,'the cash deposit shall be refunded. 13. Adequate provisions s: 's11 be mad for acceptarce and disposal of surface d ;-ainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 14. Letcers of acceptance from downstream property owners shall be required, where runoff from the tract flows onto private properties. 15. Private drainage easements with improvements for 6-oss lot drainage shall be required and „hall be delineated on the final map. BUILDING DIVISION 16. Surety shall be -posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilities necessary dewatering all parcels, to the satisfaction of t'ie Building and Safety Division. 17. Appropriate easements, for safe disposal of drainage r'. water that are c011ducted unto ow over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded ,.o the satisfaction of, the Building and Safety Division. 18. On -site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering or protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed. f' prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to, or contributes to, drainage flows entering, leaving or within a parcel #� relative to which a building permit is reque;,�ted. �i �, it Resolution No. 81 -17 , r Page 4 r� 19. Final grading plar,,,'for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Div -sion for approval prier to -issuance of building permits. (This may be•on ein incremental or composite basis,) i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUU14ONCA i BY: ti e Richard Dahl, Cha' n ATTEST: ' Secreta of the Planning Commission' I` i I, u,XK LAM, Secretary of the Planning. Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of AM the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting 9f the Planning Cc mrtsssion held on the i th day of March, 1981 by the follow'inq vote to -wit: AYES COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Rempel, King,. Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Tolstor+ i r i 1 x