HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/03/25 - Agenda Packet1
I.
.t
t
s
• R.�
r
c
i
ACTION I
II.
III.
IV
V
c e��
CIT`i OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION..
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY MARCH 25, 1981 7 :00 P.M.
LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
91El BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Coranissioner Dahl X_
Commissioner King X
Commissioner Sceranka _1L_
Approval of Minutes
January 22, 1581
Announcements
Co,�sent Calendar
"Im
Commissioner Rempel
Commissioner Tolstoy
The following consent calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon
by the Commission at one time without discussion. if
anyone has concern ovor any item, then it should be
removed for discussion.
Approved 5 -0 -0 A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81-
H SSER - The development of a 21,600 sq. ft. n u
trial warehouse addition to the existing Schlosser
Forge on 3 acres of land in the M -2 zone located at
11711 Arrow Route - APN 229 - 111 -18
VI. Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings ir which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address
the Commission from the public microphone by giving your
name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to
5 minutes per individual for each project.
Approved 5 -0 -0
Planning Commission Agenda
p
-2- March 25, 1981
MGUM111tL - A total residentiai development of 9.76 acres
into 33 lots in the R -1 zone generally located on the
northeast corner of Ramona and Church - APN 208 - 181 -06
Approved 5 -0 -0 C. ENVI
Appi'ov_ed 4-1 -0 D.
with condition that
9 mos. after occupancy
of temp. bldg. precise
plans be submitted for
perminant structure along
with more precise plans E.
for rest of center.
Continued to 5 -13 -81
to bring back P.M. &
residential alter -
natives. F.
Approved 5 -0 -0
with amendment to require
design review for all lots
within subdivision.
01N
L a U L1M11tU - A total residential development of 8.31
acres into 2 lots comprising 120 condnminiuir snits in the
southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria APM 202- 181 -07
south of
211 -12
ENVI
ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PER.MIT NO.
RD BANK - The development of G temporary
on 5.69 acres in the C -2 zone located 150'
ill on the west side of Vineyard - A ?N 207-
7
81
LUKU - JSsq1MMANULL BAP11S -r CHURCH.)_ - The construction
of a ,000 . ft. church bui ing on on 2.07 acres of land
in the R -1 zone located on the south side of 19th Street,
between Amethyst and Archibald - APN 202 - 111 -19
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10035
THE DEVELOPERS - A__re_t_idA_.n_t__i_a1 subdivision
of 15.7 acres of laid into 39 custom lots in the R -1 -12
zone located east of Red Hill Country Club Dirve, south
of Calle Corazon - APN 207- 101 -37 and 207- 092 -10
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT THE PARCEL MAP NO. 6761
Removed from Agenda CARNELIAN INVESTMENT - A residential subdivision of 18.7
acres into 2 parses in the R -1 zone located on the south-
west corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street - APN
201 - 214 -05
Cori L'inued to 4 -8-81 H. PARCEL MAP NO. 6725 - DAON CORPORATION - A commercial
subdivision of 176.86 acres into 10 parcels in the M -2
zone located east of Haven Avenue on the south side of
Foothill - APN 208 - 351 -03, 13
Approved 5 -0 -0
with amendment.
VII.
VIII.
Approvred 5 -0 -0
-- with additional pro-
vision of no outside
storage.
IX.
X
AADproved 4 -0 -0 -1
to allow appeal for
G.P. Amendment
XI.
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
DESIGNATION REPORT:
Phase I
Approved 4 -0 -0 -1
that area #1 be XII.
reclassified general
industrial. XIII.
Phase II
Approved 4 -0 -0 -1
to be changed to
heavy industrial
classification for
area 42.
Planning. Commission Agenda -3- March 25, 1981
I.
DAV S V P4 -An industrial subdivision of
4.39 acres of land into 8 parcels within the M -R
zone located on the north side of 7th Street, east
of Hellman - APN 209- 171 -37
Old Business
New Business
1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -01
COCA COLA - The development of a 26,800 sq. ft. bottled
beverage distribution and warehouse facility on 9.2
acres of land in the M -2 zone, located on the north
side of 6th Street, between Ha%,en Avenue and Cleveland
Avenue - APN 209 - 271 -21 (Easte n Portion) - (Parcel 2
of Tent. P.M. No. 6544)
Council Referrals
Director's Reports
K.
Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which
do not already appear on this agenda.
Upcoming Agenda
Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond
that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the
Commission
'This regular meeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned
to a public hearing ^n the Victoria project on Thursday,
Phase III March 26, 1981 at the Lion Park Community Center located
Approved 4 -0 -0 -1 at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, at 8:00 p.m.
that in area H3 the
2 uses already there
can expand to their
ultimate without coming back to Planning Commission. Other portion of area will
remain in general industrial.
I
!1 L r
Lot
z
O /
O
� E
J �
tr /
1 / C W
% LL4
u
J
` J <J
r Q 3t u
17 <N
J
CJ �ravnODH I,
J i
I' r�
0
Ej
'!S NVI'13NHYl
Ew 2 ��
C) o r
[ � z
U
a
z
N
Z
LL
q.•
W
r< n
z x .'•
=0J
< =u
1
f�
z
a
a
a
<
J
CL
J
YI
f
N
C
W
N
Y
F _ r�
V 0.1. <
LL
20W
o3a
'ev
Q
I
2 �
0
R-
iQ
i °a
r¢
i<
�J
a
'2
0
I�
W
iZ
0
a
F
2
R:
1
°s
F.
C
O
2
'1
n
1J
1977
CITY Or
RANCHO CLICAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY MARCH 25, 1981 7:00 P X..
LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel
Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner Sceranka
III. Approval of Minutes
January 22, 1981 •
daw
IV. Announcements
V. Consent Calendar
The following consent calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon
by the Commission at one time without discussion. if
anyo.ie has concern over any item, then it should be
removed for discussion.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -10
SC4LOSSER - The development of a ,600 sq. ft. n us-
trial warehouse addition to the existing Schlosser
Forge on 3 acres of land in the M -2 zone located at
11711 Arrow Route - APN 229- 111 -18
1'I. Public Hearings
i
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
individuals mail voice their opinion of the related project.
please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address
the Commission from the public microphone by giving your
name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to
5 minutes per individual for each project.
Planning Commission Agenda
-2- March 25, 1981
I B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10316
McDANIEL - A total residential development of 9, acres
into 33 lots in the R -1 zone generally located on the
northeast corner of Ramona and Church - APN 208 - 181 -06
7)C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11608
1 5 G LIMITED - A total residential development of 8.31
acres into 2 lots comprising 120 %ondominium units in the
southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria APN 202 - 181 -07
Co ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
81 -04 - VINEYARD RANK - The .development of a temporary
t J bank facility on 5.69 acres in the C -2 zone located 150'
(� south of Foothill on the west side of Vineyard - APN 207 -
JJJ 211 -12
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SITE APPROVAL NO. 81 -01
LORD - SHOBE JIMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH - The construction
of a 5,000 sq. ft. church bui ding on 2.07 acres of land
" in the R -1 zone located on the south side of 19th Street,
between Amethyst and Archibald - APN 202 - 111 -19
I
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10035
4� THE DEVELOPERS - A resident al subdivision
of 15.7 lend into 39 custom lots in the R -1 -12
zone located east of Red Hill Country Club Dirve, south•
f Calle Coraxon - APN 207- 101 -37 and 207 - 092 -10
acr G.NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT THE PARCEL MAP NO. 6761 NELIAN INVESTMENT - A residential subdivision of 18.7
es into 2 parcels in the R -1 zone located on the sout -
west corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street - A N
201 - 214 -05
H. PARCEL MAP NO. 6725 - DAON CORPORATION - A commercial
subdivision of 176.96 acres into 0 parcels to the M -2
mac( — �I zone located east of 4aven Avenue on the south side cf
Foothill - APN 208 - 351 -03, 13 I
8
- t
•
Planning Commission Agenda -3- March 25, 1981
fAA--, I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP N0. 724
�AVISb - n Industrial su vsono
4.39 acres of land into 8 parcels within the M -R
zone located on the north side of 7th Street, east
of Hellman - APN 209- 171 -37
VII. Old Business
VIII. New Business
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -01
COCA COLA - The development of a 26,800 sq. ft. bott ed
�� beverage distribution and warehouse facility on 9.2
6LA acres of land in the M -2 zone, located on the north
side of 6th Street, between Haven Avenue and Cleveland
Avenue - APN -209- 271 -21 (Eastern Portion) - (Parcel 2
of Tent. P.M. No. 6544)
® IX. Council Referrals
X. Director's Reports
I K. FOOTHILL BO
SOUTHEAST C
V
XI. Puolic Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which
do not already appear on this agenda.
XII. Upcoming Agenda
XIII. Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond
that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the
Commission
This regular meeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned
to a public hearing on the Victoria project on Thursday,
March 26, 1981 at the Lion Park. Community Center located
at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, at 8:00 p.m.
C�
b.0
C
ccz
+,
U
U
w
C
U
_
0
79
T. GTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMO CA
CITY COUNCIL
AGENI)k
1977 MONDAY, MARCH 30, 1981
7:00 p.m.
LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CEWE,R
9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
B. Roll Call: Frost Mikels Palombo Bridge Schlosser
60 Min. 2. CONTINUATION OF REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF LAND USE AND DEVELGPMENI SUPER
GI PWNT TCYT
Review of the Land Use and Development Super Element Text has been continued
from the previous City Council meeting in order that the City Council may
address any additional comments. Within this Element includes Rousing,
Circulation, Public Facilities, Parks and Recreation, and Community Design.
60 Min. 3. CONSIDERATION FOR ADOPTION OF LAND USE IN THE ALTA LOMA AREA
The City Council heard testimony at their March 16 meeting regarding land
use items in the Alta Loma area. These items have been brought back to
the City Council for their consideration. Once the City Council has completed
their review of the land use in the Alta Loma area, it is recommended that
they take action to adopt the Land Use Plan.
60 Min. 4. CONSIDERATION FOR ADOPTION OF LAND USE IN THE CUCAMONGA AREA
The City Council heard testimony at their March 16 meeting regarding land
use items in the Cucamonga area. These items have been-brcaght back to
the City Council for their consideration. Upon completion of their review
of the Cucamonga area, it is recommended that the City Council consider
adoption of the Land Use Plan.
5. ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting on the General Plan will be held April 6 to consider
certification of the Environmental Impact Report and adoption of the
Draft General Plan.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANUUM
DATE: March 25, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REVISION TO GENERAL PLAN IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA
ABSTRACT: This memorandum considers revision to the Draft General Plan
to i e heavy industrial south of Arrow, east of Haven, and to rede-
fine the definition of Heavy Industrial in the Draft Plan text.
BACKGROUND: City Council, at their March 23 meeting, reviewed the land
use classifications within the industrial area. It was requested by
property owners in and around Jersey Street, east of Haven Avenue, that
the City Council reclassify the area bounded between Arrow, 8th Street,
east of Haven to Rochester Avenus to Heavy Industrial and to rewrite
the Draft General Plan definition of Heavy Industrial to more clearly
define uses which exist in the area around Jersey Avenue. The City
Council approved Heavy Industrial for the area south of Arrow Highway (as
shown on the attached map), and asked the Planning Commission to consider
other areas suitable for Heavy Industrial in the vicinity as well as
redefine the Heavy Industrial Land Use definition.
In order for the City Council to make any final determination on re- :i-
sions, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to consider this
matter. The Council's action to revise the land use plan had already
been discussed by the Planning Commission; however, the Commission has
not previously discussed other areas for the Heavy Industrial type use
nor a revision to Heavy Industrial Lara Use definition. This matter
should be discussed by the Planning 'Commission and forwarded with re-
commendations to the City Council for their next meeting.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission consider if o,.her areas
are appropriate for Heavy Industrial classification. Also, the Plan-
ning Commission should consider a revision to the Heavy Industrial de-
finition as,sh�own on attached Exhibit "A ".
fulAy Ahbmitted,
tylVianner
BKH:TJB:jk
Attachment: Revised Definition of Heavy Industrial
REVISED DEFINITION OF HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
Heavy industrial uses are generally large scale developments whose activity
includes heavy manufacturing, compounding, processing or fabrication. Such
uses may also include warehousing, storage, freight handling, truck services
and terminals. Through the Industrial Specific Plan, greater definition of
uses will be established in the sub -areas of this land use category. An ex-
ample of industrial heavy uses west of Devore Freeway include; forge shops,
steel milling facilities, plastic plants, steel fabrication facilities, weld-
ing shops, woodworking facilities and heavy machine shops. Uses east of the
Devore Freeway could include large structures to facilitate processing and
manufacturing and open area storage of raw or semi - refined Droducts.
Exhibit "A"
1
I
1 �
47,
z
J
V/ v
W
zzcr-
J �
I
M
z
Y
cc
Q
G.
J J
Q Q
e
w V)
T_ =D
O Z
a
nu
I u
V
y
w
o
y a
C N
r O
N S
4 O
Q a
o. L
V O J
A O Oi OI O; O. L
O Y N 9 O O A
b • m m m m m S
• C R •1 i0 9
v ✓ L L L
N m •r � C C .�••
O A
L M Y Y Y Y 4
O O N
Y F N N N N N
y O O T n N S
n
12
N M
C
M N J
y c O .c
^yp1 o E e „ xE C? yE
C Y P L L N L ^Y
o vC c gam• YyN a oyy L
O O � �! rte•. i 4 r
N
V
Y
4
V
O
e
p L
L w
1 N O
r
A
Q r 4 O O• h N Oi
A ^ r1 C
O' N O N � G ••
N� O
N ^ • A
� 1r • Y F C
p N • O
8 N C Y O N
Y yN N L yN N
a
wm
N N N n 1'1 �
N d
ti g L
O
s ara c c m Y
c Y Y Y o
O O yCy
6 m O U N J O 2 S
CD
W
Q:
W
N
�
J
J
J
vi
H
H
J
W
H
N
VI
d'
a
m
O
N
Z
Z
C
a
Ir
H
C3
N
Z
S
cc
J
rr
cc
w
w
3
z
z
a
W
W
W
C7
U'
2
u
u
g
a
nu
I u
V
y
w
o
y a
C N
r O
N S
4 O
Q a
o. L
V O J
A O Oi OI O; O. L
O Y N 9 O O A
b • m m m m m S
• C R •1 i0 9
v ✓ L L L
N m •r � C C .�••
O A
L M Y Y Y Y 4
O O N
Y F N N N N N
y O O T n N S
n
12
N M
C
M N J
y c O .c
^yp1 o E e „ xE C? yE
C Y P L L N L ^Y
o vC c gam• YyN a oyy L
O O � �! rte•. i 4 r
N
V
Y
4
V
O
e
p L
L w
1 N O
r
A
Q r 4 O O• h N Oi
A ^ r1 C
O' N O N � G ••
N� O
N ^ • A
� 1r • Y F C
p N • O
8 N C Y O N
Y yN N L yN N
a
wm
N N N n 1'1 �
N d
ti g L
O
s ara c c m Y
c Y Y Y o
O O yCy
6 m O U N J O 2 S
I
lu 110
-XI
W
ui
..........
Cl)
hd
cc
I=
<
V)
L")
cl:
Cl
V)
-XI
c-
W
ui
Cl)
hd
cc
I=
<
V)
L")
cl:
Cl
V)
...........
L)
—j
_j
fa
LLI
V)
.............
LU
ui
uj
w
ui
0
CD
=
c-
oi19'
W
hd
cc
I=
<
V)
L")
cl:
Cl
V)
L)
—j
_j
LLI
V)
=D
LU
ui
uj
w
ui
0
CD
=
oi19'
1977
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
mepw Phillip D.9ehloeeer
Arthur! 1. Bridge Jon D. Mihrle
• see I . Frost Mlehael A. Palombo
A G E N D A
ADVISORY COMMISSION
Parch 26, 1981
Iions Center
6:30 P.M.
Designation o:` Chairman (Cucamonga)
Call To Order
Approval of M:rutes: February 19, 1981
Staff Report
At its meetinc of February 19, 1981, the Ran:ho
Cucamonga Advisory Commission requested that a
special. meeting be held to discuss the initiative
process and relate other cities' experiences with
initiatives. 4ttached to your agenda is a
memorandum outiinini the procedures for Initiative
and Referendum Elections, as well as an over7iew
of Growth Cont:ol. Both Lauren Wasserman ani
Jack Lam will .le present to discuss the initiative,
growth, and this General Plan.
Staff reports Have been limited to the discussion
of the initiat :ve and the General Plan at the
Commission's request.
immediately following the Advisory Commissica meeting
at 8:00 p.m., a Victoria Planned Community Paeting
will be held by the Planning Commission.
New Business
Adjournment
POST OFFICE BOX 807 0 RANCHO (UCAX3NGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 0 (731)989-1851
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
March 19, 1981
TO: Advisory Commission
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager
SUBJECT: Procedures far Initiative and Referendum Elections
The procedure for an initiative or referendum election is quite
complax; therefore, I have attached sections of the State Election
Code which outline in some detail the process which must be followed
in order to qualify a measure for either an initiative or referendum.
Essentially the number of signatures required for an initiative is
15% of the registered voters. As of this writing, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga has 22,744 voters. A 15% figure would be 3,411 valid sig-
natures.
In the.event a Special Election is required, the cost to the City
approximates $25,000 - $30,000. These costs are for ballot materials,
postage, election supplies, precinct workers and related expenses.
That figure is tentative and is based upon our experience with only
one previous election. If you have any questions which cannot be
answered by the attached materials, please contact me.
LMW /vz
Enclosure
the fact that to the best of his knowledge and belief each signature is
the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and
" 1 the dates between which all signatures were appended.
lI First Day The petition may not be circulated until 21 days after publication or
to Circulate posting or both of the notice of intention and statement. (e)
Last Day
5. DEADLINE FOR FILING PETITIONS: The petition and all sec -
to File
tions thereof must be filed within 180 days from date of publication
or posting (in the case of annexation of territory, within 180 days from
date first signature affixed to petition). (f)
Prima Facie
The Clerk shall accept the petition for filing if a prima facie examina-
Examination
lion shows the number of signatures appended equal to or in excess
of 10% of the :cgistered voters of the City (see paragraph A. above,
for cities under 1000 registered voters) as last reported officially to
the Secretary of State. The petition shall be deemed filed as of this
date. (g)
Verification
6. EXAMINATION OF PETITION: Within 30 days from date of
of Signatures
filing the Clerk shall check the validity of the signatures using the
original affidavits of registration or legally prepared facsimile signa-
tures. If the petition contains more than 500 signatures the signatures
may be examined by random sampling, that is,an examination of 5%
or 500 signatures, whichever is the greater, and if statistical sampling
would indicate chat 90 to 110% of the number of signatures needed
to declare the petition sufficient are valid the Clerk shall proceed to
examine and verify each signature filed.
Certification
if the petition is found insufficient no further action shall be taken.
If found sufficient the proponents -vho are notified of insufficiency
as well) are notified and a certificate of sufficiency is filed with the
Legislative Body. (h)
Initiative
B. CALLING THE ELECTION: SPECIAL ELECTION: As indicated in
Election May
paragraph A, preceding, an election is called not less than 74 days not
be Held on One
more than 89 days after date of the order. Section 4020 states that the
of Several
special election shall be called not less than 74 nor more than 89 days after
Dates
presentation of the ordinance to the City Council; however to avoid hold-
ing more than one election within any six months period the date may be
Fixed later than 89 days but as early a date as practicable zRer expiration
of six months from the last special election. When it is possible to hold
the special election within six months prior to a regular municipal elec-
tion the ordinance may be submitted at the regular election instead of dt
a special election. (i)
Referendum
C. PRELIMINARY STEPS: REFERENDUM: With the exception of
ordinances relating to elections, preservation of public peace, health or
safety, street improvement proceedings and other special ordinances
governed by state law, no ordinance shall become effective until 30 days
after its final passage. (j)
Number of
1. PETITION PROTESTING ADOPTION: A petition signed by net
Signatures
less than 10% of the registered voters of the City, or in cities witn less
than 1000 voters by not less than 25% of the voters or 100 voters (which -
Filing
ever sum is less), may be filed with the Clerk protesting adoption of
Deadline
the ordinance. It must be filed within 30 days from date of adoption
REFERENCES
(e( 4004 -4006, in 4006. (t) 4008. (h) 3707, 3708. 4009. (t) 4010.4020. U/ 4030. 4030.1.
PUB. JUNE. 1977 42
CHAPTER SEVEN - INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM ELECTIONS
(NOTE: These elections are exempt from the requirements of Division Four, Chapter One,
"Estabiishcd Election Dates" and may be held at any time provided by law that the
measure or proposition qualifies for submission to the electorate.)
Special A. PRELIMINARY STEPS; INITIATIVE: Any proposed ordinance may
Election submitted to the Legislative Body of a city by a petition filed with the
City Clerk and when such petition, duly circulated according to law, con-
tains the signatures of 15% or more of the voters of the City, or where the
City has less than 1000 voters contains the signatures of 25% of the voters
or 100 voters (whichever is the lesser number) together with a request
that the ordinance be submitted to vote of the people, the Legislative Body
may either adopt the ordinance at a regular meeting or call a special
election not less than 74 nor more than 89 days after date of the order. (a)
Regular If the petition is signed by not less than 10% of the voters or in cities with
Election less than 1000 registered voters by 25% of the voters or 100 voters (which-
ever is the lesser) and the ordinance is not required to be submitted to the
voters or is not to be submitted to the voters at a special election and is
not passed by the Legislative Body, then it shall be submitted to the voters
at the next regular municipal election occurring within at least 45 days
after the order of the legislative Body. (b)
Publication or 1. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE: Prior to circula-
Posting of tion the proponents of a petition shall publish a "Notice of Intention
Notice of to Circulate Petition" at least once in a newspaper of general circula-
Intention tion - if there be no adjudicated paper of general circulation within
the city then publication shall be in a newspaper of general circula-
tion adjudicated as such within the County in which the City is located
and the notice and statement shall also be posted in three public places
within the City such as are utilized for the posting of ordinances or
if there be neither a newspaper adjudicated as one e! gmral circu-
lation within the City or the County then the notice shall be posted
as stated above. (c)
Content 2. CONTENT OF NOTICE: The "Notice of Intention to Circulate
Petition" shall be so titled and shall contain the names and signatures
of at least one but not more than five proponents and shall contain
a statement not exceeding 500 words setting forth the reason for the
proposed petition. (d)
Filing of 3. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION: Within 10 days of publication,
Affidavit posting or both, proponents shall file affidavit of publication executed
by representative of newspaper or of posting executed by a voter of
the City - such affidavit together with a true copy of the notice and
statement as published or posted shall be filed with the Clerk of the
legislative body.
Petition 4. CIRCULATION OF THE PETITION: The petition may be in one
May be or more sections, however each section shall bear a copy of the notice
in Sections and statement and each petition or section shall have attached to it
the affidavit of the circulator thereof setting forth his qualifications,
REFERENCES (a) 4010. (6) 4011, (c) I00J. (d) 4001.
PUB. JUNE. 1977 41
of the ordinance and the effective date of the ordinance is thereby
suspended.
Unlike petitions on initiative measures there are no requirements for
posting or publications of notices of intent.
Content 2. REQUIREMENTS OF PETITION: Like the initiative petition,
the petition for referendum may be circulated in sections and each
section shall contain a copy of affidavit of circulator attached there-
to. (k)
Certification 3. EXAMINATION BY CLERK: Examination shall be in the same
by Clerk manner as for initiative petitions - first the prima facie examination
and thereafter the random sampling and verification of signatures.
(See paragraph A(6), preceding.)
If the signatures were not all appended within 30 days from adoption
of the ordinance and the petition filed within that time the petition
is void. (1)
4. Elections shall be called and held in the same manner as those for
initiative measures. (m)
Suggested D. CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION: NOTICE: Assuming a special elec-
Publication tion for initiative or referendum has been called to be held not less than
Date for 74 days nor more than 89 days from date of the order or ordinance and
Notices assuming there is not a consolidation with another election it is suggested
that NOTICE OF THE ELECTION be published or published and posted
::t the earliest possible date.
1. PUBLICATION: Once a week for two successive weeks with five
days intervening between publication date. (See Publication Notice
of Election on Measure under General Municipal Calendar.) (n)
Notice to 2. ARGUMENTS: While Sections 4015 and 4017 preempts filing of
File Arguments arguments for and against initiative and referendum measures, the
State Supreme Court has held that others may file arguments where
those favored by these sections fail to do so. It is therefore suggested
that the Clerk set and notice by publication or posting, or both, dead-
lines for accepting arguments for the measures submitted. (See Argu-
ments under tab- General Municipal Elections.) Preferences shall be
given in the same order as those cited for general municipal elections
and shall conform as to length and requirement as !o verification
and format. (o)
3. Rebuttai arguments may be provided for; pursuant to Elections Code
section 4015.5. See paragraph K.5. under tab GENERAL MUNIC-
IPAL ELECTIONS for procedure to permit rebuttals.
Publication 4. NOTICE OF PRECINCTS - POLLING PLACES AND BOARD
Notice MEMBERS: Procedure is the same as those for the general munici-
Polling pal election. The notice must be published not less than 20 days prior
Places to the date of the election. (p)
REFERENCES (k1403:, 11140514036. (n) 4037. fa) 2.783J. (o) 4013, 50104016. (p) 1:834.
REV. DEC. 1977 43
General 5. In every other respect the election is conducted as is a general muni-
Procedure cipal election. While the Clerk shall cause a copy of the ordinance or
measure proposed to be mailed with the sample ballot at least 10 days
prior to the elections, the Legislative Body may direct that a synopsis
of the ordinance be prepared by the City Attorney and mailed where
the ordinance exceeds 1000 words in length. However the synopsis
must warn the voter that it is a synopsis and is not the complete text
of the ordinance or measure, and offer to mail a complete text of the
ordinance or measure to the voter at the voter's request by returning
"......the enclosed prepaid postcard" at no cost to the voter. (q)
6. INITIATIVE: EFFECTIVE DATE: If a majority of the voters vote
in favor of the ordinance it shall be considered as adopted on the date
the tote is declared by the Legislative Body, and shall go into effect 10
days after that date. (r)
Applicability to NOTE: Articles I and 2 (commencing with Sections 4000 and 4050, respectively) of
Charter Cities the El. Code covering initiative and referendum do not apply to cities having a charter
adopted under Section 3 Article XI of the Constitution and having no such charter
provisions for the initiation of ordinances directly by the voters. (s)
Petitions to NOTE: If the charter itself doe: not set forth the procedure governing its amendment
Amend Charter or revision see Chapter Eleven on "City Charter Elections" setting forth the sections
of the Government Code that govern such procedure.
RdFERENCES (y) 40 ?9. (r) 4011. 1+) 4061.
REV. JAN. 1980 44
March 20, 1981
TO: Members of Advisory Comnission
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Mana
SUBJECT: Growth Control -- An Overview
The members of the Advisory Commission have requested additional infor-
mation concerning alternatives available to control residential growth
;n Rancho Cucamonga. Until recently, both growth control and zoning
matters have been traditionally determined by City Councils and the
appointed Planning Commissions. However, since June of 1978 at least
32 growth related propositions have been voted on by the people. As
of this date, nineteen passed.
These ballot propositions have taken two forms. Some are initiatives,
written by citizens outside of government and put on a general election
ballot. Others are referenda. A referendum is a proposal written by
a city council and submitted to the people for a vote.
The "successful" propositions attack growth in several ways:
1. Some set growth -rate limits. Santa Barbara's initiative, for
example, limits population growth to .9% per year. The City
of Santa Cruz limits its growth to 1.4% per year.
2. Some limit the number of new dwellings allowed. Belmont's
initiative allows only 56 units per year and Redlands' allows
450.
3. Stockton's and Modesto's measures effectively require a popu-
lar vote before those cities can expand beyond their present
limits.
4. Measures in Tuolumne and Santa Crut Counties directed the
Board of Supervisors to prepare growth management plans. The
Tuolumne initiative was followed by a stronger proposal which
would have cut the county's growth rate from 12% to 3.4 %, but
the measure was defeated.
Continued.......
4
Growth Control - An Overview
March 20, 1981
Page Three
significant to note that most of the interest in a growth limitation
ballot measure occurred be Pore the City Council had made any decisions
on the proposed Sedway /Cooke General Pla:i. The elected City Council
has already responded to most of the concerns expressed by citizens
of the City. Densities originally proposed by the General Plan con-
sultants, Sedway /Cooke, have been reduced significantly by the Council.
It is anticipated that further density reductinns may be directed by
the City Council or Planning Commission at the time the Terra Vista
specific plan is reviewed later this year.
The democratic process mandates that City Council members be elected
by citizens to make critical decisions concerning major city policies.
Those representatives have demonstrated a sensitivity to the concerns
of their constituents by suggesting numerous changes in the proposed
General Plan. The initiative or referendum process should be available
as a "last resort ", only when elected representatives have failed to
respond to the concerns of citizens. That has not been the case in
Rancho Cucamonga.
Other reasons why a ballot measure may not be in the best interest of
the Community are:
Ballot measures represent a less than desirable method for establishing
public policy. The democratic process has demonstrated that public
policy is best determined by elected representatives.
2. Ballot measures are expensive and generally cumbersome to administer.
Ballot measures, once enacted can be changed only by approval of the
voters. There is virtually no rap ctical way to quickly rectify a
problem which may arise with a voter - approved measure.
4. Ballot measures dealing with growth limitations often fail to con-
sider what may be best for the entire community rather than; a specific
interest group.
5. Advocates of ballot measures frequently fail to evaluate the negative
economic imput on the community. This is particularly important in
cities which are attempting to establish a sound economic foundation
by attractin, regional shopping centers.
6. Ballot measures occasionally represent a radical approach to a problem
or an overreaction to a past decision of elected representatives.
Continued......
Growth Control
March 20, 1981
Page Two
- An Overview
5. Riverside's initiative sets minimum lot sizes, with larger lots
required on hillsides.
6. Siskiyou's Board of Supervisors asked voters in Scott Valley
if they approved of a draft land use plan for their area. They
did. The plan was prepared by a committee of local citizens.
7. A few ballot propositions have dealt with specific projects
rather than growth control in general. For example, Santa Barbarans
voted against funding an aqueduct to connect the city to the state
water system. The inevitable result: growth control by thirst.
Sacramento voters rejected a proposed sports stadium that might
have stimulated development of farm land near the city. A proposal
to stop construction of the Warm Springs Dam in Sonoma County,
however, was soundly defeated.
These measures share some kinship with Proposition 13. They were enacted
through the popular election process, not by elected officials. They
indicate a statewide distrust of established government by removing powers
traditionally lodged there. They also favor established, homeowning
residents. They involve experiments that established "experts" tend to
regard as radically tough.
The initiatives suggest a trend toward greater popular acceptance of growth
control than was apparent before Proposition 13 passed. Numerous growth
management ordinances passed in the traditional way by city councils and
county supervisors in the last two years point the same direction. The
record of these initiative documents show that growth control is one of the
most hotly controversial issues in California today. More initiatives
passed than failed, but many did fail. Spending against them has been
substantial. Locally elected officials have converted growth control into
a ballot propositiun partly because they recognised that their consti-
tuencies and financial supporters were badly divided and sometimes not
fully informed of the issues.
Members of the Advisory Commission are aware that Rancho Cucamonga already
has one of the strictest growth control measures in the State. The City's
Growth Management Plan does not set up arbitrary limitations on the number
of dwellings constructed each year. Rather, the plan emphasizes consistency
with the General Plan, the ability of schools to accommodate additional
students, and the ability of the City and the Cucamonga County Water District
to provide essential public services which are required as residential
growth occurs.
Based on our experiences during the General Plan process, it appears that
the issue of growth initiatives was generated as a result of citizen con -
cera over densities recommended by the Planning Commission. It is
Continued.....
Growth Control -- An Overview
March 20, 1981
Page Four
Although it is far from perfect , the democratic system of government
which places the responsibility for determination of public policy
with elected representatives is still the most effective way to
operate the City. The challenge confronting each of us is to encourage
the fullest exchange of ideas and to express some degree of trust in
those whom we elected to represent olir interests.
It is recommended that no action be taken to advocate a growth limitation
ballot measure.
LMW/ vz
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADVISORY
COMMISSION MINUTES
February 19, 1981
1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission was held
at the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9719 Arrow Highway.
The meeting was called to order at 6:34 by Chairman Sharon Romero.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Sharon Romero, Mary V. Lane,Nacho Gracia, Joe White, Don Baer-,
T. Harrell Allen, John Vlasic, Marge Stamm, Helen Blanchard,
Dennis L. Stout, Jim Mendez, Glenn Rankin
Absent: Mary L. Barlow, Faye E. Stamper, Charles J. Buquet
Also
Present: Councilmen Frost and Mikels; Jack Lam, Dir. of Community Devl.;
Bill Holley, Dir. of Community Services; Harry Empey, Finance
Director; Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer; Bob Rizzo, Administrative
Aide, Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Due to a lack of a quorum at this point, Chairman Romero postponed approval
of the minutes until other members of the Commission arrived. Discussion
proceeded on those items which did not require that a quorum be present.
4. STAFF REPORTS
a. Eucalyptus Globulus Tree Maintenance
Chairman Romero reported that at a previous meeting, the Commission had
asked the City if they could put residents in touch with someone from
the tree maintenance business who could offer a lower rate for maintenance
of Eucalyptus Trees on private property.
David Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor, introduced Pat Mahoney from West
Coast Arborist (the company which has been awarded the contract for tree
maintenance for the City). Mr. Leonard reviewed the cost to the City
for tree maintenance and stated that the cost for trimming a 24" diameter
Eucalyptus tree would be $105.00.
Mr. Mahoney said that this rate is about 50% lower than the amount that
would be charged to an individual homeowner who contacted them. However,
he stated that if a group of homeowners got together the cost would be
lower than the individual rate, but not as low as the City contract rate.
Discussion followed regarding tree maintenance within the City and '
possibility of having the trimmings from the trees delivered to a yard
where they could be distributed as firewood.
Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission
Page Two
February 19, 1981
At this point (6:44 P.M.) enough members of the Commission were present to
establish a quorum and Chairman Romero asked for a motion on the approval of
the November 20, 1980 and December 18, 1980 minutes. Motion was made by
Marge Stamm to approve the minutes, seconded by T. Harrell Allen with all
voting aye. Motion carried.
b. Inout from Advisory Commission regarding City Grapevine Newsletter
Bob Rizzo, Administrative Aide, was commended by the members of the
Commission on the recent issue of the City Grapevine Newsletter.
Commission members suggested that future editions might also include
articles helpful to new residents; i.e. how to take care of Citrus
or Eucalyptus trees, type of groundcovers or plantings to put on
slopes to prevent erosion, etc. Mr. Rizzo stated that he will
include articles of this type in future newletters, hopefully
beginning with the next issue. Mr. Rizzo reported that the next
issue of the newsletter will not be mailed as an insert in the
Highlander but rather as a direct mailing at a special non- profit
postage rate.
c. Letter of thanks to Pam Henry regarding her work and assistance with
the Rancho Cucamonga Equestrian Trails.
After a brief discussion regarding all the work contributed by
members of the Alta Loma Riding Club regarding the Rancho Cucamonga
Equestrain Trails, the following motion made made:
Moved by Joe White that the City send a letter of commendation to the
Alta Loma Riding Club in general, and Pam Henry and Chris Benoit in
particular, for all their work and assistance with the Rancho Cucamonga
Equestrian Trails. Seconded by Mary Lane and all voting aye. Motion
Carried.
4. New Business
Sharon Romero referred to work being done on the Flood Control project for
the Demens Channel at Sapphire and Banyan and the signs that were recently
erected regarding access. She stated that she thought this was an equestrian
easement. Mr. Hubbs, City Engineer, replied that it is a flood control right -
of way and the Flood Control District owns the land and has access. However,
he noted that the District has probably obtained temporary easements for the
trails behind-the Mark III homes and that he would check into it.
Sharon Romero also inquired about the block walls recently built along Carnelian
to deflect water, noting that several contractors from the area had told her
they were not aware this was going to be done. Mr. Hubbs said that it was
important that this project be completed as soon as possible and that since
it was under $5,000, the City was not required to advertise and go out for bid.
He stated that three letters were mailed to contractors inviting bids.
Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission
Page Three
February 19, 1981
Mrs. Romero referred to an one hundred acre park which is shown on the Draft
General Plan close to the Etiwanda area and a newspaper article that indicated
that this area is not designated as a park. Bill Holley, Director of Community
Services, stated that it is still an one hundred acre park and is included on
the plan which the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council.
Growth Limitation In"*_;ative
Don Baer stated that residents have indicated they want lower densities than
those proposed in the General Plan and that he could not sae justification -or
some of the high densities. He discussed a growth limitation initiative to
put the question back in the hands of the people. John Vlasic concurred with
Mr. Baer and noted that he felt the people have a right to determine the size
of the City. Joe White questioned the cost effectiveness of an initiative
going to ballot. Discussion followed regarding the General Plan and the City's
obligation to comply with State and Federal housing legislation.
Chariman Romero noted that the figure for build -outs had gone up successively,
except for the last number which had gone down, and questioned this. Council-
man Mikels stated that these are merely theoretical numbers and pointed out
the General Plan can be revised three times a year.
Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, discussed overall density, noting
that it had actually lowered. He pointed out the General Plan process is not
complete, since it has not been reviewed by City Council yet. In reply to
inquiries from Commission members, Jack Lam stated the present projected popu-
lation figure is approximately 140,000.
Joe White reiterated his position, noting that the City Council should be
given an opportunity to review the General Plan before any action on an initiative
is taken. Discussion continued with each member present given the opportunity
to express their viewpoint. Concern was exp•-essed by the Commission regarding
whether the General Plan could be changed after it was adopted. Jack Lam replied
that the option was always available to change the General Plan, provided the
changes could be justified. He noted that probably at no time has the control
on development ever been greater than at the present.
At this point, a motion was made by John Vlasic that the Commission recommend
to the City Council that it would be appropriate at this time to obtain a consensus
of voter's opinion. Seconded by Don Baer.
Prior to the vote on the motion, David Recupero from the William Lyon Company
requested that the Commission postpone action on the initiative since the City
Council had not yet approved the General Plan. He stated that Mr. Frye was willing
to continue to work with residents.
Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission.
Page Four
February 19, 1981
Marge Stamm noted that the initiative process would be an enormous amount of
work for a few people since Alta Loma residents probably would not support it
and Commission members from Cucamonga had already stated there was a lack of
interest in that area. She stated she hoped they could achieve what they
wanted without an initiative.
Some of the Commission members stated they felt those members not present should
also be given an opportunty to express their opinion on this matter. At this
point the previous motion and second were withdrawn and the following new motion
was made by John Vlasic:
1. A date for a special meeting of the Commission be set within
the next two weeks with the issue of the initiative as the only
item of discussion.
2. Request that City staff research the initiative process and give
input to the Commission regarding other cities who have gone through
the initiative process.
3. Request that the City Attorney give a legal description of the
initiative process.
Seconded by Marge Stamm. All voting aye. Motion: Carried.
John Vlasic requested that staff set up the meeting and send a letter to all
members of the Commission stressing the urgency and importance of attending
this special meeting.
Councilman Frost stated that the Commission was beginning what could be a
very costly proposal as far as the City was concerned and both Councilmer. Frost
and Mikels suggested the Commission first find out the City Council's position.
There being no further business, motion was made by John Vlasic to adjourn
and seconded by Mary Lane. Meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. to next scheduled
meeting.
Respectfully Submitted
-un
Ginny Zi tara
Acting Secretary
r
mA��Z m Z
a C
A �
11°S R I I ; qz1
igitn
It "S -4
"m
�C
y
a
zi ;��
=ZD HZZI
�G
Nl 0Z >-i�
d �rn� °�
A z �vam��(���
�:�M�l
�p w y
3^
�Z. —�e�w
oz—
P 4SiS.i1
u 3
� ^e
°
x
G�" k ?4
� � r
Z4r a lot
m�g�z m Z N "�z I :l MR
0 �0 PZ A -4^ V�.O T zA
z
K Z p p
�uRD'
RZ i11 �eM
Xt
i 3z
it x 112
\.no 1:1, t
c w
�4 �1 -sae
e x�
ft
I A l
a
n
O
0�?2 !p ?-4
9soI> C) Zm
�Vi Z s; 4
P Z 77 y! 6) a
IAA q *m �Zm�s =73IP
?Za�n�a•m-0 v
VV i
lit 311
in
n0 c
75
V. N O
IN
bbo z�
7iiej, fn V) w
° FE
4
* =�Z
ow -.A vp
to 5
�Z�s�TMz Z
s�c4-- ,g��N�3
�3 ti; 1�
is; Vr $ R�� 1 1. v: °w���
Ic
INE aim° �f��� a
in � � �
2 ` g 3 IF
t 4
��� 4
rim
w
p s� c �»
10
}* o
a n
n
� a�b
oZO��a� *tea
mj1 _ ;nE — I iK0.
Ow u Q y �Y
ZQ�3P �v > >jjp�m 2 16
Oz z
ooh- -, `s o4:1 $C, Qy ira
fa
m LRz@x $ jz
Irlo 10,
Z
IM31; 2 � v 9t 's
jj�z 11 44
oth Nin
z
Nt
jb
Z ��C�
�
H
C4 IWO
fro
n
V v --0
Iwo
MOE
-� w_ �m
03 wm��� Z
�AS
If
ZGo —��n
I� Ijz
i U" I
t OW
R ID
°
3
4gz o 24 ° $
To
o� � � l ire
z C4
N
x10 �°
P 10
�
r
i 4 a
a n
.Ry
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
January 22, 1981
Adjourned Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
The adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, was held in the Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9491 Archibald,
Rancho Cucamonga, on Thursday, January 22, 1981.
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Dahl who led in
the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jeffrey King, Herman Rempel,
Jeff Sceranka, Peter Tolatoy,
Richard Dahl
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
STAFF PRESENT: Barry Hogan, City Planner; Tim J. Beedle, Senior
Planner; Edward A. Hnpson, City Attorney;
• Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; and
Nancy McAllister, Secretary
ANNOUNCLKENTS
Barry Hogan, City Planner, stated the Interim Zoning Ordinance has been
passed through second reading by the City Council with no further changes
at lass night's meeting. Staff will have revised copies of the Ordinance
for all Commission members within one month. He indicated the Subdivision
Ordinance was also approved by the Council at last night's meeting.
Mr. Hogan submitted a revised copy of Resolution No. 80 -83 setting forth
recommendations for the draft General Plan relating to the Alta Loma
area of Rancho Cucamonga.
Mr. Hogan submitted an excerpt from the minutes of the adjourned Planning
Commission meeting of December 18, 1980. He asked that the Commission
review the minutes and if the Commission wishes this can be discussed
tonight.
Barry Hogan stated at the last meeting, the issue of wineries was discussed.
Staff has submitted a memo suggesting a way in which the winery issue
can be dealt with at the General Plan level and how implementation might
occur. It is recommended that the Commission direct staff to include
04) the paragraph in the Sedway /Cooke General Plan Text.
Mr. Hogan stated one additional memorandum regarding a proposed Planning
Commission Resolution establishing a street naming policy is being •
submitted to the Commission. This memorandum discusses a proposed
resolution establishing a street Qaming policy. Staff will be contacting
the Commission in the near future relative to the Street Naming Committee's
desires. The Commission may schedule a meeting with the Street Naming
Committee to discuss changes to the resolution.
Mr. Hogan submitted a copy of the draft environmental impact report to
each of the Commission members. This will be on the next Agenda as a
discussion item. Copies will be available to the public shortly.
Mr. Hogan stated staff needs some additional guidance on the property
located at 4th and Archibald. He passed suggestions out to the Commission
in order that the Commission may consider what 1, 1 use should be placed
on this property. Secondly, in regard to the issue of Opici Winery and
the relocation of the Junior High School site, staff has met with the
Alta Loma School District and they have agreed to another location for
this proposed school. He stated the Commission can either take action
on these items tonight or continue review to the next meeting.
Chairman Dahl asked that the excerpt from the December 18, 1980 adjourned
meeting can be discussed at this time.
Commissioner King stated he abstained from review of this item.
Commissioner Sceranka stated he does not believe it was stated that the
density of Hillside Residential shall be no greater than 2 units per
acre.
Commissioner Rrmpei stated he believes this was recommended.
It was the consensus that the tape for this item be reviewed for further
clarification on this item.
REVIEW OF RESOLUTION NO. 80 -83
It was the consensus of the Commission that Resolution No. 80 -83 setting
forth recommendations for the draft General Plan relating to the Alta
Loma area of Rancho Cucamonga be approved as submitted.
Barry Hogan, City Planner, asked the Commission if they would like to
take action concerning the winery at this time.
It was titre consensus of the Commission to add this item to the January 28,
1981 meeting. .
Planning Commission Minutes -2- January 22, 1981
0
Mr. Hogan stated in regard to the Junior High School site, the school
district has moved that location to Wilson Avenue, next to the elementary
school site.
Commissioner Sceranka stated he would like to see something from the
school district indicating the criteria used to determine school sites..
Mr. Tim Beedlr, Senior Planner, stated the school districts have indicated
that al', of the proposed sites are tentative locations. We can request
that th:y indicate which school sites they are more certain about.
It was the consensus of the Commission to ask the school district what
criteria they are using to determine where a school site is placed, and
that this be further discussed at the January 28th meeting.
Barry Hogan asked for guidance on the property located at the corner of
4th and Archibald which was reviewed at the last ,eeting. Staff had not
received clear direction at that time. Does the Commission want to see
an industrial park along 4th and Archibald with residential land use in
the remainder of the property? Mr. Hogan stated there is no spokesman
for the property owners in this area. The Commission wanted the staff
to poll the property owners to see if they would like to go together on
the site. That developer wants to master plan the entire 160 acres into
a residential tract. Another developer would like to develop office and
another wants to see office and residential. We can not get any consensus
from the property tuners.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would perscnally feel if we can get the
entire 160 acres planned in some fashion, the City and the property
owners would be far better off. At the corner of 4th and Archibald, he
would want some commercial shown, north from that corner all the way to
6th Street be designated an office park, with the remainder of the
property to the west of Archibald designated light industrial. He would
also consider some high density residential in the area along the south
side of 6th Street.
Barry Hogan suggested that the text state that the area bounded by 4th
and 6th Streets, Archibald and Hellman be master planned as an entire
unit. Then what you have to do is designate on the map what you want.
In this way development does not have to be considered until the entire
area is master planned. He stated staff can bring this matter up at the
January 28th meeting and submit examples of what he has described.
It was the corsensus of the Commission that this item be continued to
the meeting of January 28, 1981 in order that the staff may submit some
alternatives and examples for subject area.
0 Planning Commission Minutes -3- January 22, 1981
UN 100 LNAP11 E-6VIR
SUPER ELEMENT
Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed a slide presentation and the staff
report. Staff recommends that the Commission review the Draft Environmental
Resource Super Element with all revisions and, if found satisfactory,
adopt the element as revised.
Commissioner Dahl stated one of the statements made by Mrs. Romero at
the last meeting was that she would like to see plants that help perpetuate
wildlife. This would include plants with nuts and berries.
Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing.
There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Dahl closed the
public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Rempel and seconded by Commissioner
Sceranka to approve the Draft Environmental Resource Super Element
subject to the following amerdments:
1. Page 204, 1st paragraph, 3rd sentence shoui� read: "The City,
through its comments should ind-cate that it is the City's
policy to maintain the area north of the present City limits
predominantly in open space with limited development potential
in areas where environmental constraints are significant. Any
development approved in this aroa should be responsible to the
natural resources." (Note: The word "not" was removed from
the sentence).
2. Page 184, Table IV -2, under native groundcover, a statement
should be added that s-..ne thought or consideration should be
given to fire resistant plants.
3. A statement should be added that plants be included that will
help perpetuate wildlife.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL
NUES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
THE PUBLIC HEALTH
Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report and slide presentation
for the Commission.
Commissioner Rempel stated there is a grammatical error on page 220, the
staff correction should read: "This hazard with lateral ground movement
is the primary cause for the collapse of buildings."
Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 22, 1981
•
0
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if a section has been added about winds.
Tim Beedle stated policies on wind were added on page 262 and 263.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated quite often a developer is not aware of the
fact of intense wind. He should be made aware of this at the time of
design review. The garage doors, if possible, shouldn't be on the north
side of the property, as he has seen people try to open their garage
doors during the intense winds and have had them slam down on them. It
might be suggested in these cases that the buildings be rotated in some
way.
Mr. Hogan stated this could be done through the Design Review Committee.
Commissioner Sceranka stated there should be some way to designate
landscaping should be specially designed to with•tand the wind.
Barry Hogan stated this has been taken care of through the city's landscape
standards. It requires double lodge pole stakes on all street trees.
Chairman Dahl asked why the statement that there has been an increase of
burglaries after incorporation (in part due to greater reporting of
crimes) has been included in the text on page 258 (crime prevention).
Commissioner Rempel stated it would be best to delete both paragraphs
regarding crime, as they add nothing to the text.
® Commissioner Sceranka stated on page 264, Regulatory, the word "mandatory"
under Mandatory Planned Unit Development should be deleted.
Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing.
There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Dahl closed the
public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Rempel and seconded by Commissioner
Sceranka to adopt the Public Health and Safety Super Element subject to
the changes as indicated above.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, S[ KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL
NOES: COKMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
8:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed.
8:15 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened.
0 Planning Commission Minutes -5- January 22, 1981
REVIFW AND DISCUSSION OF DRAYT COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
Barre Hogan, City Planner, reviewed the slide presentation and report on
the draft Community Deslgn.Element.
Commissir :er Tolstoy stated this is a very important part of our General
Plan • there are'some things which the General Plan should address in
order' l., identify the three communities (Alta Loma, Cucamonga and Etiwanda).
It has been said there should be features in the communities that when
you drive into one of the areas you would know right off that you are
not in the Cl.ty of Upland or the City of Fontana. There should be a
distinctive street design and possibly many other features. He is
really sorry that this element does not speak of the identity of the
three communities and street design in a better fashion.
Commissioner Sceranka stated special landscape standards should be
established along Foothill Boulevard.
Mr. Hogan stated the community design element is not a required element
of the General Plan. If the Commission feels strongly about the inadequacy
of this document, it could be removed from the General Plan and could be
reworked.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated this element should not be deleted at this
time as there are some very good points in the text.
Mr. Hogan stated the Commission could direct staff to go back and try to
put in some of the more obvious things. Staff does not have the time to
give this all the attention it deserves at this point but could come
back to you again at a later date and amend the element.
Commissioner Dahl stated a statement should be added to the text that
the natural and manmade environment of Rancho Cucamonga shall be designed
and coordinated to establish the identity of the City as a single entity
while also preserving the individe•al significance of the older villages,
to improve the image and appearance, and to promote the functional
efficiency of the City.
Commnissioner Rempel stated on page 128, Base Line should be included in
the list of streets. Travel routes should be clarified to state that it
would be really great that Foothill, Haven and Base Line be so designed
with landscaping and meandering sidewalks so that when people pass
through they will want to get out of their vehicles and walk a while on
the st- i-eet. If we could develop the streets in such a way that people
will want to walk up and down them, we will have something.
Commissioner Sceranka stated he would agree. What will make our City
different form the rest of the communities is how we allow open space to
be transferred from vacant fields with orchards and vineyards to set-
backs, variable set -backs and cluster development with characteristic
type of screening and planting. Those kinds of characteristics are
going to make the city something unique.
is
Planning Commission Minutes -6- January 22, 1981
Commissioner Tolstoy stated the view of the mountains is also �r asset.
We should make a concerted effort to not block that view.
Commissioner Rempel stated on page 125, the middle illustration is
atrocious and should be deleted.
Commissioner Dahl Stated on page 129, he is totally opposed to a regimantalized
appearance along Haven Avenue.
Commissioner Sceranka stated we need to take a look at the industrial
area of the City for the proper place for urban identities. He would
agree that it would not be appropriate to have canopy type trees on the
north -south streets as they will block the view of the mountains.
Mr. Hogan stated in the landscaped areas, if native grasses of the area
are used with perhaps areas of ground without cover, it would give more
of a country theme and naturalized landscaping. The north /south streets
could have more vertical trees.
Commissioner Sceranka stated in regard to streetscape and median islands,
he has a problem with median islands themselves. The maintenance factor
is significant and we are wasting a lot of water in the way they are
designed. He does not want to see this City perpetuate median islands
that Llinuse a resource such as water.
Mr. Hogan stated some of the characteristics and specific designs for
median islands should be included in the General Plan.element. Staff
can work on this and come back to the Commission with the specifics.
Commissioner Rempel stated on page 126, the statement, the design of
public transit network, etc., to minimize... He stated he would use the
word reduce instead of ninimizc. A period should be placed after transportation,
the rest of the sentence should be eliminated.
Commissioner Sceranka stated the entire sentence has nothing to do with
that policy and could be eliminated.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would hope the Design Review Committee
will use this element as a text book.
Commissioner Sceranka asked if Victoria is the only collector street
that has been designated as special boulevard.
Mr. Hogan stated at this time it is; however, there may be some other
streets that might be added after the Etiwanda area is reviewed. It has
been suggested that Rochester, Church or Miller also be shown as special
boulevards. Victoria can be dealt with through other means and if the
Commission is comfortable with deleting Victoria as a special boulevard,
staff would have no problem with that. He would suggest that no decisions
regarding this be made at this time until after review has been made of
the Etiwanda area.
0 Planning Commission Minutes -7- January 22, 1981
Commissioner Sceranka stated on page 145, the second policy states the
surrounding area should be developed in a way that minimizes impact in
the North Town Area and is harmonious with its physical form. He is not
sure whether this statement should be reworded or left in the text.
Mr. Hogan stated this will be reworded.
Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing.
Mr. Doug Hone stated he met with Lloyd Michael from the Water District a
number of years ago about basin water preservation and planning. We are
one of the few cities in the entire Southern California area that is
somewhere within reason on its drafting of water out of the basin. For
every ten parts of water used in San Diego County, none parts are imported.
In this area, nine parts of water are used and maybe on occasion we use
one part from MWD. We really have a unique opportunity in this General
Plan to balance our landscaping objectives with our water capabilities.
Some of the older homes in the City are very beautiful and what he would
call "individual ". He would like to see consideration given to placing
the words "individual initiative" into the design standards as these two
words mean a lot, as it gives the idea that individual creativity can be
used.
Commissioners Dahl and Tolstoy stated they would agree with Mr. Hones'
sthtements.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated he doesn't know of many places in Southern
California that have the basins that we have. Perhaps the General Plan
should address this, as this needs to be preserved in this community.
Tim Beedle stated the environmental resource element does discuss the
basins.
Commissioner Sceranka stated he doesn't like to see parkways sprinklered
and 90% of the eater carried out into the gutters. Also, when it rains
all the water runs into the street. We should retain as much of the
water as possible.
Mr. Gary Frye stated if canopy trees are used on the east /west streets
and columnar trees on the north /south streets, the view of the mountains
can be retained. He further stated he does not understand the statement
on page 127 of the text which states that Etiwanda Avenue is a secondary
street.
Mr. Hogan stated this needs to be reviewed in more detail.
Mr. Frye stated he would like to add that he hopes the City is in agreement
that trees are an important part of the City's image.
There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Dahl closed
the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes -8- January 22, 1981 •
Commissioner Sceranka stated on page 146, the second policy states
® centers should be designed. It should be more clearly stated as to what
kind of centers we are talking about. He totally disagrees with the
first item under the policy, as he doesn't necessarily want to make this
community urban.
Mr. Hogan stated staff will rework these policies.
Commissioner Sceranka stated on page 147, neighborhoods and sub- areas,
he is not sure that schools should be located near shopping centers.
This should be deleted. Also, on page 1470 he does not understand the
third item from the bottom of the page.
Mr. Hogan stated staff will take a closer look at this. He stated staff
intends to make the corrections as indicated by the Commission this
evening and bring the element back to the Commission at their meeting
next Monday night. At that time, it would either require snottier special
meeting to take action on the items or if the Commission is comfortable
with the changes, this could be placed on the February 2nd Agenda.
It was the consensus of the Commission to bring this element back to the
next General Plan meeting for further review.
9:25 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed.
e9:35 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. ,
REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ON DRAFT ENERGY CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Tim Beedle, City Planner, reviewed a slide presentation and staff report.
He recommended that the Commission adequately evaluate and discuss the
Draft Energy Conservation Element objectives and policies so that staff
might be able to obtain insight into potential recommendations to be
brought back at the January 27, 1981 meeting.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated more graphics are needed, in this element.
Barry Hogan stated staff will add additional graphics as suggested.
c Commissieiier Rempel stated there are some areas that need to be reworded.
He doesn't think this 0 ty is ever going to be self- sustaining in energy.
That statement should be removed.
Commissioner Sceranka stated tht energy conservation element should
review the effects of street widti:9 and landscaping as well as possibly
more specific discussions that could recommend or promote building
projects within the City.
40 Planning Commission Minutes -9- January 22, 1981
Mr. Beedle stated this community, having a large undeveloped area,
really has an opportunity to do something unique in terms of energy
conservation in the industrial area.
Commissioner Sceranka stated the industrial area of the City would be
the most economical place to have solar heating and cooling systems.
Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing.
Mr. Doug Hone stated this element could have a reference for ongoing
changes and should possibly go as far as to establish some type of Solar
Committee with Chaffey College. They have quite a good start in solar
technology and might encourage more community participation in that
effort.
Commissioner Sceranka agreed that Chaffey College does have a complete
solar program and they have done a tremendous amount of work in this
regard.
There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Dahl closed
the public hearing.
Chairman Dahl stated there ought to be a way within our General Plan
text that can address ongoing changes, as every day there seems to be
new changes and concepts taking place. We can automatically update this
in this way.
Commissioner Sceranka stated he would also agree that an Advisory •
Committee to the City with a member of the college solar class be considered
to keep the City updated as to any new advancements in regard to solar
energy. There are also solar manufacturing plants within the city which
could provide valuable expertise in this regard.
It was the concensus of the Commission that the above - mentioned changes
be made by Staff and resubmitted for Commission consideration at their
meeting of January 26, 1981.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Sceranka,
carried unanimously, to adjourn.
10:10 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
JACK LAM, Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes -10- January 22, 1981
March 24 1981
To: The Pl4nning C mmiss.o
Re: Tenative Trac N 10035'
Being a homeowner �s- rFonerty aff - opting the tenative tract no. 10035 I have certain ^...
concerns with the nrorosed project. Unfortunately other responsibilities make it
impossible for me to attend the me( ing Shen the project will be discussed and I must
therefore submit these concerns in fritting,
I am concerned with the following:
1 Grading in the area; With no a ecific grading indicated it is diffi.:ult to discuss
the impact on the nre -Ae however, a: can be seen from the topography, extensive grading
will be required to set both strw improvements and home pads. The effect of this
gr -ding on nstural water flow need to be thorcughl3 -:r investigated pricy to approval
and specific grading for street and homesite looked into. Furthermore, backfilling
In areas indicated will be extersire and could contribute to major rune 'f and flooding
problems.
2 Noise and vibration le -•els; Tie report concludes that there will be no major
increase in noise and vibration 1, eels. However, by changing Camind Praderm from a
de -dend street into a through str- et will cause an increased traffic flow and thus
increase noise and vibrationAeve s. Presently there is no traffic in :he project
area The increased traffic flow rill also effect the health and safety of the
residents in the -Area surrounding the proposed project. These should is investigated
prior to annorval
3 Since this is a custom lot subiivision no indication of the type or placement of
a home on a lot is indicated. It :a impossible, therefore, to determine what effect
any individurl improvement will ha re on view azd properly value. Furthermore, since
this is a custom lot no further pudic input can be made on this issue. If thir,
nro.ject is anni-oved it should incl) de a resident review of hmeae nLmstru :tion wh Leh
night effect their lots.
4 My nronerty prosently drains into th.e project Area and any ir_�prcvveme it to proposed
Tot 23 could dversly effect. this drAinAge, Infaet the whole water flc r pattern in
Ore proposed arec is extensive dad varied arA should be studied •pith so ihasia on how
en;; proposed in*+rovemerts might adversly effect it,
5 Because of the varied and extreme topography of the area more precis a and detailed
Pr ^din^ nrono9al should be made, Lrcluded in these proposals should be grading not
only for the proposed project (rtreA and subdivision) but also allowat Le home site
pr -din, -nd their effects on surfs<e and subsurface drainage.
Un'ii. theme cincernz are addre4aed •necifically, I would suggest that tie Commisson
n ,)t. el prove thirz nroiect Particularly questions concerning drainage and traffic
flort1qafety nu-t be znawered I would also suggest that the City rege :re the develoner: to
pre4ent a com -late environaental imr3ct report on the complete project ,including home
buiadinp) prior to approval.
Rennectrkftl —t.3Wed
Edward Clark
£747 C-lle Coraxon
J0 WILLIAM I.YON"1m and
9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K, RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA 91730 • 171,. 40 -2244
March 25, 1981
city of gaucho (ticamonga
Planning Cammission
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject: Request for continuance
Dear Sirs:
We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing
from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981.
This continuance allows the staff and Planning CommLssion members ade-
quate time to rev; v changes made to the Pl.omwd .comamity 2text8to
conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing April
GF /kj
cc: Jack L;.a/
Barry r'-)6m
Sincerely
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT \
9%'LVILLIAM LYON nY�y
9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K. RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 • (7141 980-2244
March 25, 1981
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
SubjecC: Request for Continuance
Tear Sirs:
We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing
frcm March 26, 1981 to April 29 1981.
This continua a allows the staff and Planning Ccmmissioon members ade-
quate time to review changes made to the Planned Community text to
conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981.
+F/ ri
cc: Jack Lanz
Barry Mogan ✓
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
,70 WILLIAM LYON';6vny%=/
9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 • (714) 980 -2244
March 25, 1981
City of Rancho Cucaannga
Planning Cammission
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Qr monga, CA 91730
Subject: Request for Continuance
Dear Sirs:
We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing
from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981.
This continuance allows the staff and Planning Commission members ade-
quate time to review changes made to the Planned Cam inity text to
conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981.
GF/kj
cc: Jack Im
Barry Hogan
Sincerely
QRegi! tiager
rz,
C0411UFRN p r 1 ,
UNIrY0f41
P� AR `VFIO "(4
A
2 T A
J
718191101/1112 1� .9l
���3i4 Pd1
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
90 WILLIs -M LYON9�ml&xj
9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 • (7141 980-2244
March 25, 1981
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject: Request for Continuance
Dear Sirs:
We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing
from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981.
This continuance allows the staff and Planning Cc mission members ade-
quate time to review changes made to the Planned Ccmmity text to
conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981.
GF /kj
cc: Jack Lan,
Barry Hogan
Sincerely
R I1*0 ger
C/T y 11, 1 (. r
CO�iMONI
0�ll ilZ� Z i 2i 3(gU Q f iS ppf pN T2
l , NT
7 �81g1 ld p� 2 5 138
Sl
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
,OtiVILLIAM LYON�4m/�W7
9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730
City of Rancho Cuca>mnga
Planning Commission
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject: Request for Continuance
Dear Sirs:
17141 980 -2244
March 25, 1981
We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing
from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981.
This continuance allows the staff and Planning Commission members ade-
quate time to review dm ges made to the Planned Community text to
conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981.
G',Ikj
cc: Jack Lam
Barry Hogan
Sincerely
C!T y Uf" "
COM�ONI ,yp
RAMC
CAM
7 rlgh, J lgg� T D pT%i
8�g110 1111212 �j3i4 p
it X516
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
•�FZWILLIAM LYON'��,W
9613 ARROW HIGKWAY, SUITE K, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 • 17141 980-2244
March 25, 1981
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject: Request for Continuance
Dear Sirs:
We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing
from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981.
This continuance allows the staff and Planning Commission members ade-
quate time ro review changes made to the Planned Ccmunity text to
conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981.
GF/ __j
cc: Jack Lam
Barry Hogan
J
crTyor``r��
10MrwoNI RANCHO D
YQ f!0P , CAMON
AM `'IAi� 2 MfNT p fPr�)
19
7i8i9, 10�i1�12 81
! r�i3f 4iS 8
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
ii
it
Cl
-1
1-1
ii t_
"1
!1
"1
1
! I
!1 1
I
•
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY GF RANUiO CL;CAMQNGA
MFF REPORT
March 25, 1981
Planning Commission
Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -10 -
SCHLOSSER - The development of a 21,600 sq. ft. industrial
warehouse addition to the existing Schlosser Forge on 3
acres of land in the M-2 zone located at 11711 Arrow Route
APN 229 - 111 -18
BACKGROUND: This review is for Environmental Assessment to determine
any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this
project. The site and architectural design is not considered unless it
is related to environmental concerns. To determine significant adverse
impacts an Initial Cttidy on environmental concerns is prepared. Upon
completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant
adverse impacts or the potential for significant impacts. If a deter-
mination of no significant impacts is made, based upon the Initial Study,
then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If signifi-
cant impacts are found, then an Environmental Impact Report shall be
required to fully analyze the impacts of the project.
The detailed site plan and elevations will be reviewed and approved with
conditions by the Planning Division subject to approval of the Negative
Declaration.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The applicant is proposing'to construct a
21,600 sq. ft. building for the storage of raw materials on 3 acres of
land located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of Rochester Avenue.
The following is the adjacent land use and zoning of this site.
LAND USE ZONING
North
Vacant
M -1
South
Vacant
M -2
East
Vacant
11 -2
West
Vacant
M -2
The subject property is presently zoned M -2 and is designated major
industry on the Interim General Plan and General Industrial /Rail Served
on the Draft General Plan. This project is part of the expansion plans
for the Schlosser Forge operation.
ITEM A
l
CJ
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Raw Material Warehouse
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Phillip D. Schlosser
11711 Arrow Route, Cucamonga 987 -4760
NAME, ADDRESS,
CONCERNING THI S
11711 Arrow Rc
TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
PROJECT: Albert W. Holguin
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
11711 Arrow Route, Cucamonga
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
Y -!
OR 81 -10
Staff Report
-2-
3 -25 -81
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been com-
pleted by the applicant and is attached for your review and consider-
ation. Staff has completed Part H of the Environmental Assessment
and has round no significant adverse impacts on the environment as
a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with such
findings, then a Negative Declaration would be in order.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon analysis of the initial Study, it appears
that the project will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the
environment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Nega-
tive Declaration for the project would be 'n order.
Res6ectful�y sybmitted,
BKH:DC:cd
Attachments: Part I
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Initial Study
"A" - Locatior. Map
- Site Plan
- Elevations
E
•
•
PROJECT DESCR ?PTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Raw Material Warehouse -Steel
Structure - 60 feet wide 20 feet bigbby 160 feet long
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 21,600 square feet
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON*RrNTAI, SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Abandon vineyard surrounded by existing manufacturing buildings.
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series,
of cumulative actions, which although: individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
None
x- 2
n
LJ
C
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
_ x 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
.X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
x S: Remove any existing trees? How many?
_ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTANT: If the project involver, the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
Date 2 -19 -81 Signature AG )
Title Senior Vice President
I - -3
n 1
!i.!i
1
! I
E
CITY OF
® RA\CHO CUUMVIONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
C V
NORTH
ITEM: 091 sloplo _
TITLE: 511E-
E\HIBIT: — —SCAU -- ""
i
I
a
1 -.:i: '1 -. -, -
w /Gear �.•, .
-2it
w ..t s
.
Au" mrc
+�
•� •SAW fY1R
� TZ
01n(J Mrtt Afbae �
� J
rma
JJ i I III I
IYfAgw ,.
,• , II
w �.WJ
Raw
"MOM MMvtwllr
L07 LSD
1
E uwaw
..
I I 11(I l I I I I I I I U11L1111
_
f
ICI
_!
Me-
w•.
IRILLY40K0 IRl/ �
�T
/
',LOT ti
Tr
w.0 No SW 001two
+ . `
- !,
1% / / /// / / / / /ail /�1U11 r
- -: . � • •, r.`- •
•aumlr a+ Iwr M+lu.._. •r i . �:.'�i,�. L' a.0
;:.'s:'
.., ...,: .. _ ... ;� }s :`
... _ .. ......
_
CITY OF
® RA\CHO CUUMVIONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
C V
NORTH
ITEM: 091 sloplo _
TITLE: 511E-
E\HIBIT: — —SCAU -- ""
i
I
AL
r.enyy�) ire ..
CITY OF
RAI'CHO CL'CAi�IO \'Gjk
PLANNING DIVISION
r�ww+rrwr
i
V V
NORTH
0
ITE\1: _ �� r 81 "(a
TITLE: _ ELeVAT ON ty •
EXHIBIT: G ..SCALE
•
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
— CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA,..JNGA pG�Icn.H��
STAFF REPORTS °�
LL
0
Y
' f
U
March 11, 1981 1977
Planning Commission
Barry K. Hogan, City Planner 4y
Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
AL
McDANIEL - A total resiaentiai oeveiop
into 33 lots in the R -1 zone generally
northeast corner of Ramona and Church
ent of 9.76 acres
located on the
APN 208 - 181 -06
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of a 9.16 acre resi-
dential subdivision located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Church
(Exhibit "A "). The site is presently zoned R -1, with an existing single
family residence on the corner. The site is presently being farmed for
citrus. Several stands of Eucalyptus exist around the perimeter of the
site. The Interim General Plan indicates low density residential (2 to 5
units per acre), and the Proposed General Plan indicates lore density
residential (2 to 4 units per acre). Surrounding properties are similarly
developed with single family residential subdivisions.
The proposal has been reviewed as a total development package by the Growth
Management and Design Review Committees in accordance with the Growth
Management Ordinance, and received a point rating which exceeds the required
threshold of 68 points, and the project is therefore, eligible for consider-
ation by the Planning Commission. The conceptual grading plan (Exhibit "C "),
for the tentative map has also been reviewed by the Grading Committee, and
received approval in concept only.
ANALYSIS: The tract map, as shown on Exhibit "B ", has been prepared in
accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the City Subdivision
Ordinance. All structures have been sited in accordance with the code
setback requirements. Accesr, to the tract is being provided by a new street
from Church Street that will link -up with the existing southerly extension
.of Teak Way. Thus providing two means of access. The proposed street
system has been designed to accommodate future subdivision of that portion
of the site containing the existing single family residences as shown in
Exhibit "E ". The development is proposing construction of a slumpstone wall
with redwood panel inserts, an alluvial rock parkway and street trees along
Church Street from the easterly boundary to the proposed street into the
project (Exhibit "D "). This landscaping would become part of a City land-
scape maintenance district. It is also recommended that landscaping and
fencing be provided , and included in the maintenance district on the east
street side of Lot 8.
ITEM B'
TT 10.116
Staff Report
-2-.
March 11, 1981
The Design Review Committee was not satisfied with the location of the
d,Aveway and garage on Lot 9, and recommended that the driveway and garage
be relocated to front on Yew Street.
Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for
your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has
conducted a field investigation. Upon completion of the Initial Study,
no significant adverse impacts were found as a result of this pre;2ct.
The issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the Commis-
sion concurs.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was advertised in the Daily
Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 96 public hearing notices
were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To
date, no oral or written communication has been received regarding this
project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct
a public hearing to consider public input on this project. If, after
such consideration, titq Commission concurs with the findings and condi-
tions recommended by Staff, then the adoption of the attached Resolution
with conditions would be appropriate.
,ted,
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading
Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Lrndscaping
Exhibit "E" - Future Subdivision Study
Exhibit "F" "I" - Elevations
Part I, Initial Study
Resolution of Approval
Conditions of Approval
0
•
i
S N 111
inq IRS :....
I�IY�� :ij ■ r�
ping oil
mass
CITY OF ITE.w: "Ti 10 31
® RANCHO CUCANIONCYA TITLEJ - OCAMON 'MAR
PLANNING QIVISON EXHIBIT :_ SCALE: I A� 1 =
o 1 �' s Z i • —;
CL
W O = ' �l i 1r f £ ��f Ali Ic�'L `! j a vn
all
pq
I
2-2-
LI
i I It St 1 ^� i 'cr � i ;~ ` � I � �' `` i \� •I I i
r4
0
JF
!� 'II •l: �� 1' 1
•i � tl � G ice.
n/
1 1
7
� nn
I I -1�V
II .
uli ,
N1`
.�
1 , •Ili �. .,' .
i, I
L ; :
�
•.•'
' r,.t
I
�I�I i� ^�i rllill,:a
ih ;�
i �'�
��
II +I✓.I:s.
JF
!� 'II •l: �� 1' 1
•i � tl � G ice.
n/
1 1
7
� nn
I I -1�V
II .
uli ,
N1`
R 111.]iii.�I
G %ikl.
x'717 I
{ , i
1
6
{ t t {
' 1
0
t
r �
tl
u4
h
Z
•v ao j Q
4
J A
� - t
{iLEi !�1
\i
1
1
r, 't
Y�
Li F
1
;tl •I•
i' x
I —� -- _:1� •_
I� ;,-
V Y a ,j
If
of;
I
w • jjI
m \ lI � u rl �\� , 1 1
x..11 � r.:�ll .� ''��` /' \� �/ •�' 1 ;I
. .. _ • .�. .✓ . 1 �- . 1. � 'i w I 111~'+' V
,1 ry -.� 1 1 ate- •>\ - -.I .4 .{ ji t_
^� i. 1' y _ ( f) 11`r � `1 1 • `1 I rv. w. wl '- :1111
_ - - _• __� �! �_.- 11��.. -�� � `� //. �.— III- t 1�
_I r•l� _ , 1 � � - — 1 111 1 � r— «_. � r'a
t '/- 1 I_ Imo_ "i • / �: 1i i�
i Al
I• � 1 r
I 1 - it \ III 1 Iti � 1 1 I I I•^j � 1 ' I �\ /
•`'. ,1 I ..y I - �1 1I "I I, I I� I i� \ = 1 y � I J
1 • h . I 1 - •1� I '.h _y 1111111 •� . �I A , 1
Bo
R 111.]iii.�I
G %ikl.
x'717 I
{ , i
1
6
{ t t {
' 1
0
t
r �
tl
u4
h
Z
•v ao j Q
4
J A
� - t
{iLEi !�1
\i
1
1
r, 't
Y�
Li F
1
;tl •I•
i' x
I —� -- _:1� •_
I� ;,-
V Y a ,j
If
of;
I
w • jjI
m \ lI � u rl �\� , 1 1
x..11 � r.:�ll .� ''��` /' \� �/ •�' 1 ;I
. .. _ • .�. .✓ . 1 �- . 1. � 'i w I 111~'+' V
,1 ry -.� 1 1 ate- •>\ - -.I .4 .{ ji t_
^� i. 1' y _ ( f) 11`r � `1 1 • `1 I rv. w. wl '- :1111
_ - - _• __� �! �_.- 11��.. -�� � `� //. �.— III- t 1�
_I r•l� _ , 1 � � - — 1 111 1 � r— «_. � r'a
t '/- 1 I_ Imo_ "i • / �: 1i i�
i Al
I• � 1 r
I 1 - it \ III 1 Iti � 1 1 I I I•^j � 1 ' I �\ /
•`'. ,1 I ..y I - �1 1I "I I, I I� I i� \ = 1 y � I J
1 • h . I 1 - •1� I '.h _y 1111111 •� . �I A , 1
C
I ry 7
er i
44
O
Q
Hy
ae
F
17:j3
/WO
�
y
O
r
L'
3
I
r
is
{-; -
Y
{J JI 1
I
I -' I
♦hs
t
_ J
J
OL
4)
I�
•
I ry 7
er i
44
O
Q
Hy
ae
F
17:j3
/WO
r
L'
3
I
r
is
{-; -
Y
{J JI 1
I
I -' I
♦hs
t
_ J
J
OL
4)
I�
•
•
0
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCANNIONGA
PLANNING DIVISM
V �I
NORTH
ITEM: I 2316 _
TITLE: 5050051W ��_�
EXI IIBIT: e SCALE:
1
i
�,�4l9!Il19��7
Ll
Lf L,
Ell
I
10 jig
it Z>
(LW
� • C
77i r
I,,L
C
I a
s
El
$A
I I
•
CI
0
r
E
Jf�
�i
<J3
Or
ti
I�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.O*iGA
INITIAL STUD`_'
PART I — PRofrCT INFORMATION SHEET — Tv be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: TRACT NO 10316
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (714) 984 2414
Dell M_ Mv, Daniel Tnn
1013 Beaonia Avenue On a io 91762 na_
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: nel_1 M-nnniPl or Gary Mnnaniol
1013 Begonia Avenue Ontario 91762 Tel (714) 984 2414
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
Northeast corner Ramona Avenue and Church Street= _
Assessor No 208 181 06
LIST OT11ER PEiLMTTS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATF•. AND
FEDERII, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
C R f n F1 nnH rnnFrnl ni c+ri ri- r1wamnnna (Irvin *v Wn+,P n' %
I -1
;W'r tU NEVV70N, INC
SURPEYINC
674 WESr 1 SFeEEF
ON!"") rgUF 91762
"4 rrl:; i°M V01
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Consr.ruction of 33 Single Family
rpci.tipnrpc
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXIPTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY:
Total Acreage 9.76 Acres Includes lot'21 which w— ill
remain intact.- Existing building 4,000 So Ft +-
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONINIM1TAL SETV NG OF THE PROJECT. SITE
INCLUDING INFORMUMON ON TOPOGRALPFly, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIPIALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL, OR SCENIC ASPECTS;, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION Ot ,..7Y .
EXISTIP:G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Site Presently a bearing citrus grove surrouiiddd by
eucal tus trees serving as a wind break. Propose rac
is surrounded on all sides by singe ami y rest ences.
• —There are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects_
Existing structure on lot 21 is a single family residence.
A garage is located on the Past side of lot 21. These
structures are to remain_
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
Of cumulative actions', which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
—ahiG i a complete oroiect. It will not havp nnv
significa
0
x- z
1 impact.
ET , TI IIS PIIQJr :T:
YES NO
_ x 1. Create a substantial change ii ground
contours?
x 2.
Create a substantial change
ii
existing
noise or vibration?
x 3.
Create a substantial change
i:i
demand for
municipal services (police,
fire,
water,
sewage, etc.).,
_ x 4.
Create changes in the existingf
zoning ur
general plan designations?
x 5:
Remove any existing trees?
How
many? 950 + -
x
6.
Create the need for use or disposal
of
potentially hazardous materia:.s
such as
toxic substances, flammables
car
explosiv -s?
Explanation cf any YES answers above:
The existing citrus trees will have to be rem-)ved.
The eucalyptus trees will have to be removed or topped
for safety reasons.
IMPOP.TaNT: If :he project involves the construction of
res- dential units, complete the form on the
next. page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements :'urnished
above and is the attached exhibits present the data and
informat.ton required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information pres±nted are true and correct tc the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further unoerstan3 that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evauuation can be made by _he Devolo�nenc
Revic%a Corimittee.
Date Signature J�
Title 's rc 5
Z3
..
RESIDENTIAL CONSTP.0 TION
The folIOWing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: DELL M. MCDANIEL INC TR: 10316
Specific Location of Project: Northeast corner Church Street and Ramona P.c
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PIMSr 4 TOTAL
1. Number of single
family units: ,33 33
2. Number of multiple
family units: 0
Dete proposed to
begin construction:
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model 4
and r Of
Tentative
S. Bedrooms
Price Ranve
/3ci
8 Svo
/S71 '1,Yr
9-�- Sz7 0
M1i?
l
.- 4
I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE °LANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10316.
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10316, hereinafter "Map"
s6bmitted by Deli McDaniel, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision
of 9.76 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Church Street
and Ramona Avenue into 33 lots, regularly came before the Planning
Commission for public hearing and action on March 11, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions I ^eports; and
WHEREAS, the.• Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10316 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The desigr or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specifi: plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the su`)division is not likely to caul-
substantial environmental damage and cxr; idable inju *y to
humans and wildlife or i.�eir hab=.tat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serioas public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property ;within
the proposed subdivision.
e
Resolution No.
Page 2
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a h..legative Declaration is issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10316, a copy of.which -is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
1. Installation of storm drain on
tract boundary to Church Street
required.
Ramona Avenue frog north
storm drain shall be
2. All existing easements lying within the future right -
of -way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the
City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of
the tract map.
3. All perimeter landscaped parkways are required to be
annexed into the landscape maintenance district.
4. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be
installed on public right -of -way on the perimeter of
this tract area shall be continuously maintained by
the developer until accepted by the City and annexed
into the landscape maintenance district.
5. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of
any existing utility facility that would affect construction.
6. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and
disposal of surface drainage entering the property
from adjacent areas.
7. Additional wood trim and architectural treatment shall
be provided on side street yard elevations.
8. The driveway and garage on lot 9 shall be relocated
to face the north property line on Yew Street.
9. That detailed elevations and landscaping plans shall
be submitted for fencing and planting to occur on the
east side of lot 8. Said landscaping shall become
part of a maintenance district.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl,, Chairman
E
ILJ
Resolution No.
Page 3
ATTEST
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 11th day of March, 1961 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
111,:,' 1
C
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
AOF'ri aaa.a mwA /G 'lob A i 4� I t\ I !
Subject:
Applican'
Location
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE 141TH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. Site Development
1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file
in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
time of Building Permit issuance.
�4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation
Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards.
4e 5. ,Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and
located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division.
6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with
view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be
subject to approval by the Planning Division.
7. If dwellings aro 1:0 be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill
— — Fire D:str -c tp as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the.
Fire Chief a A Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division
for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
I.00�9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally
integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties
and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions.
10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conaitions of approval contained herein shall be completed to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.
C (...
11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan
shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of
shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties.
_ 12. A'1 swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall
be solar heated.
13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open
spaces and recreational uses.
14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals
kept out of public view from private and public streets.
15. Standard patio cover plans hall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first
unit.
16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a
clear and concise manner, including proper illumination.
17. Solid core exteriur doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be
installed on each unit in this project.
18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit.
19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted
for a solar water heating unit.
20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be
incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited
to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation double
paned windows, extended iverhangs, pilotless appliances, etc.
21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a
solar water heating unit.
2. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the
satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District.
23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout
the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma.
A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes,
physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City
equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map.
_ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance di.stri.ct for maintenance
of equestrian trails.
E
11
11
25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or
rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing
criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall
be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels
at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision
shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building
permits and occupancy of the units.
B. -.Parking and Vehicular Access
1.
All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension
of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall.
2.
Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size,
3.
All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide.
-
Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum
_Z4
of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with
Foothill Fire District requirements.
_ 5.
All parking spaces shall be double striped.
6.
All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers.
7.
Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked.
8.
The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on
this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the
owner.
9.
No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other
than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed
by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to
issuance of building permits.
C. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of
existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be
completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the
proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to approval of the finel grading plan.
3. Eucalyptu wherever be
trees
shall be approve
ed for rein
e Master the tPlan of Existing On-Site Planning Di Trees.
trees which are approved for removal may be required t� be replaced on a
tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division.
4 accordanceewith theiMaster Plan of street treesrfor�theaCityeofnRanchod in
Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior
streets and 20 on exterior streets.
5, A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
sha'l be provided within the development.; 206 -24" box or larger, 70 %-15
gallon, and 10° % -5 gallon.
6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and with
slope planting a requirements ofa the cCity of d
Rancho�Cucamonga�or5ucheslope an
planting shall include t :t riot bbelli itedlto rootand9irr'igationrShall Such
appropriate shrubs and trees.
be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the
developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied yathe Buser.
Prior to releasing occupancy for
shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in
satisfa ;tes shall
ycondiion.eded with c l
native grasses upon �
completionoflgrading
such slop control
or an alternati a method ferosion subdivisionssshallrbe provideditoln9
germinate the seed and to a print 6 months after germination.
g. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained
by a pr ofhofemaintenancecshallnbersubmittedato the eCityiprior tto issyuch
a^ce
of building pern +its.
appropriate
9. The front yard landscaping, and an irrigation system, shall
be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans.
10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscapiandanhall
sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans
be subject to approval by the Planning Division.
11. A minim:am of specimen size trees shall be planted
within the project.
12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, specirnan
size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along
D. Signs
C C
1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance
with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs.
2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the
Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of
Building permits.
3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this
approval and will require separate sign review and approval.
E. Additional Approvals Required
_ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit.
2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map.
_ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval
of Zone Change and /or Variance Conditional Use Permit
4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at
® which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke
the Conditional Use Permit.
5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by
purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on
or adjacent to their property.
In purchasing the home located on Lot ' , Tract '
on ; I have read the C.C. & R.'s and
er
undstand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re-
ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian
traffic to gain access.
Signed
Purchaser
Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to
occupancy.
__/6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of
building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification
from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of
Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or
will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such
letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within
sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision
map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
_ '. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance
of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the
affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or
will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by
the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in
the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable
by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi-
fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be
obtained and submitted to the City.
8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map
is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is
involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project
unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission.
S. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
--' required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section
of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation
of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DI4ISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
F. Site Development
�1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval
of this project.
�2. Prior tc issuance of building permits -Fnr combustible construction, evidence
shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply
for fire protection is available.
�3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling
unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee.
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial
development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan
Checking Fees.
5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued
for this project within one year from the date of project approval.
6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 0
_ 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material
and non - combustible roof material.
_ B. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the
street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding
or plan -ons where appropriate.
G. Existing Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances
` considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and
Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped
to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code.
H. Grading
�1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices.
The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the
® approved conceptual grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the
State of California to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist
and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior
to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit
whichever comes first.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPL?ANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
I. Dedications and Vehicular Access
-Z 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way
and all necessary easements as shown on the tei,tative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the
following streets:
_ � 9 additional feet on "
14%- additional feet on_4,e�A
additional feet on
C
_/3. Corner property line radius will be required per C;ty standards.
_± 4. All right of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as
follows: (_�;T "P C2 / fee( 7_ MA
5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over
private roads, drives, or parking areas.
6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal
circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the
property or in the operation of the proposed business.
J_ Street Improvements
—/1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street
lights on all interior streets.
2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to:
STREET NAME
CURB &
GUTTER
A.C. SID'_-
PVMT. b1ALK
DRIVE
APPR.
STREET
LIGHTS
A.C.
OVERLAY
WHEEL
CHAIR RAMPS
OTHER
®
Avo
j*0
'0'0e
3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment
permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements,
prior to issuance of an encroachment permit.
5. Surety shall be posted and ar, agreement executed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public
improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever comes first.
6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, prior to occupancy.
7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per the requirements of the City Engineer. 0
K. Drainage and Flood Control
1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage
facilities required by the City'Engineer.
2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations:
3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding
under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions
of the program and City Ordinance No. 24.
4, A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect
the structures b diverting sheet runoff to street.
rr� .
® 5{ellp - t trs shall be designed asonajor water carrying
streets requiring a combination of special curb height�, commercial type
drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood prbtection wails, and /or
landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line.
L. Utilities
--*Oer1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground
including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV.
—Z 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving
utility companies and the City Engineer.
3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public
utilities, as required.
/4.
Developer shall
be responsible for the installation
of street lighting in
accordance with
Southern California Edison Company
and City standards.
Water and s :•er
system plans shall be designed and
constructed to meet
--Z5.
requirement= of
the Cucamonga County Water District
(CCWD), Foothill Fire
District and the Environmental Health Department of
the County of San
Bernardino. A
letter of compliance form CCWD will
be required prior to
recordation.
d
S.
Approvals have
not been secured from all utilities
and other interested
�v
agencies involved.
Approval of the final map will
be subject to any
I
requirements that may be received from them.
M. General Requirements and Approvals
1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
A. Caltrans for:
B. County DUST; Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading perm it)
C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District
�; D. Other:
_ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles
of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of
the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to
the City.
4/3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention tc form Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs
involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer.
Z4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
L
E
Ell
CITY OF RtsNCHO Ct1CA MONGA
9FAF1L' REPORT,
DATE: March 25, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11608 -
L & G LIMITED - A total development of 8.31 acres into
2 lots comprising 120 condominium unit; in the southeast
comer of Arr_;iibald and Victoria - APN 202 - 181 -07
BACKGROUND: This tract was originally presentec to the Planning Com-
mission at their meet -Ing of February 25, 1981. Tie Planning Commission
continued review of the project for further consi(eration of the visitor
parking areas and interior pedestrian circulation by the Design Review
Committee. The Design Review Committee has met w*th the applicant and
architect and feel as though they have resolved tie Commissions concerns.
Please find attached as Exhibit "A" a revised site plan indicating the
pedestrian circulation system on the interior of the project which is
proposed to be designated with architecturally treated concrete paving.
The Design Review Committee also discussed the distribution and lucation
of visitor parking areas. The Committee felt that the visitor parking
areas, as presently proposed, is adequate and that any additional alter-
ations to the location of visitor parking areas world create substantial
revisions to the project which they felt were not iiarranted since the
development does meet the required visitor parking requirements.
Please find attached a copy of the Staff Report of February 25, 1981
in which the proposed conditions of approval are ccntained.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planring Commission conduct
a public hearing to consider and review all aspects of the project. Upon
conclusion of the public hearing, if the Commission desires to approve
the tract then it would be appropriate to adopt the attached Resolution
with the proposed conditions of approval.
tfull.V spVmitted,
BKH :MV:cd
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Revised Site Plan
Planning Commission Staff Report of 2 -25 -81 & attachments
ITEM C
t �• q . I r, t f }+
+ �r .��r � � n r r , 1 .1.,, • � i. fr � +.
t7 1 l , 1 r • ,��
r
11.
5.
t 1 T .•. � ••.L 4•,
f ICi
1 _ j
• r mnw
c..
' r
.�t o /vc•—�i
ANA
G, It
SUN
y�g - +li 6'Zw ►.� 1 O OJT +
�a
t
fo
6 yjy O !Itli W. ��NO Rj ilS4j' �� 1'V �.O 'e ?.: ►?-� .
IT
Ae
Ce
La Igla
�%�Ify
c�j�1t ° 4, ��f �I �. �'C_� 4th,.. • ..
YOr l N�JT00_I i \ dY"��! R
l� Ke
��i�'1P ��li. °.Ibi+n F' +rP.�' - Il��• � '• ^ r
� �' y ?ems r�p18. ••�, ,p e" �� ,a •.
•
rt
s
/ • ^
Ul
- �• CITY OF RANCHO CU&,oi XJrA
STAFF BLE, PORT
DATE: February 25, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael D. Va'irin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11608 - L & G
LIMITED - A total development of 8.31 acres into 2 lots com-
prising 120 condominium units in the southeast corner of
Archibald and Victoria - APM 202 - 181 -07.
BACKGROUND: The applicants are requesting review and approval for the
development of a multiple family project consisting of 120 dwelling
units on 8.31 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Archi-
bald and Victoria (Exhibit "A "). The site-is presently undeveloped
occupied by unmaintained citrus q rove. The site is presently zoned
R -3 (Multiple Family Residentialand is planned on both Interim and
Proposed General Plans as Medium Density Residential at 5 -14 units
per acre. Early in 1979, the Planning Commission had reviewed and
approved an apartment project on this project site. The approval
that was granted by the Commission has since expired.
The Growth Management Review and Design Review Committees have re-
ceived and rated the project and it has obtained the minimum points
necessary to be considered for approval by the Planning Commission.
ANALYSIS: The project and subdivision map has been prepared in ac-
tor ante with the State Subdivision hap Act and the City's Subdiv-
ision Ordinance. In addition, the site is proposed to be developed
in accordance with Zoning Ordinance provisions and development stan-
dards as adopted by the Planning Commission. The development plan,
(Exhibit "B "), proposes two types of dwelling units; a townhouse
style unit and a patio style unit. The dwelling units have been
placed in groups of buildings at different lengths to provide var-
iation of character and style of the development. The buildings
are proposed to be set back from Archibald Avenue a minimum of 30
feet to up to 45 feet. The variation in the building setbacks along
Archibald and Victoria will provide needed visual relief.
Planning Commission
Tentative Tract 11508
February 25, 1981
Page 2
Access to the project will be provided from one driveway off of Victoria
Street. No primary access is proposed along Archibald Avenue, only a
secondary emergency access which will be turf blocked. Additional turf
blocked areas are provided throughout the development for needed fire
lanes. Archibald Avenue will be fully improved to its master plan width
and a minimum of 26 foot 1/2 street will be provided for Victoria Street.
[Ultimately, it will be improved when the approved project to the north
develops]. The development proposes to provide two attached, covered
parking spaces for every unit. In addition, an additional 25 stalls are
being proposed for visitor parking.
The conceptual grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the Grading
Committee. No exterior or perimeter slopes will be created and drainage
will be appropriately designed. This project is required to participate
in the development and installation of a master plan storm drain system
in Archibald Avenue concurrent with the development of the site.
The conceptual landscape plan, as shown in Exhibit: "C ", proposes an abun-
dance of landscaping throughout the project area, including meandering
sidewalks, mounding, and dense landscaping along Archibald Avenue and
Victoria Street. There are some existing Eucalyptus trees along Victoria
Street which would necessiWe removal as a result of the street improve-
ments. There is another grove of Eucalyptus along the south boundary line
which is proposed to be removed because of the proximity to each of the
dwelling units. However, the applicant proposes to replace all trees re-
moved with an equivalent speciman size tree. The development proposes a
recreation area which will include a pool, some active open space areas
and a tot lot. Individual patio private space units are proposed to be
enclosed by low profile fences of various materials.
The Design Review Committee reviewed the design of the project and unan-
amously recommended approval of the design as it provides a variety of
building materials and variation which will provide a positive character
to Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street. The attached exhibits display
the proposed design of the structures and the types of exterior materials
which include shingle roofs, stucco, wood siding, brick, and shingle
siding.
Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is attached
for your review. Staff has completed Fart II of the Initial Study and
a field investigation. No significant adverse impacts on the environment
were found as a result of this project. Issuance of a Negative Declaration
would be in order if the Planning Commission concurs with such findings.
I]
KI
i
Planning Commission
Tentative Tract 11608
February 25, 1981
Page 3
I
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised in the newspaper as a public
hearing it before the Planning Commissior. In addition, public hear-
ing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the pro-
ject site. To date, no written or oral communications have been received
regarding this project.
RECOMMENDA :riON: It is recommended that the Planning wmmission conduct
a pu .c ea nr g to consider public input on this project. If, after
such consideration, the Conursission concurs with such findings and con-
ditions of approval as recommended by Staff, then the adoption of the
attached Resolution with conditions would be appropriate.
lly; submitted,
anner
BKH:MDV:cd
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibits "D" and "H" - Exterior Building Design
Part I of the Initial Study
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
i
W
a
Ililld . LJ J
.as rnu�n �i�
a
r
O ) 1
m � t
u � 2
Z -
i
i'
t
®.l
J
09CO-095 0=1 'ONHCMU3 'SrM LIZOM 'UM 3INSM L"S
I r 5
Elm
gn
uj
I r 5
A'
t C`
L
ar
Im
1
� � �.�1tOi��M7.lq,.aer J. v -' �.. i• • � •.nkrlg uQ �i �� �.Si . '
1
°
y j` • ".:C: d` .,' r,''' e < Rio,,, w�
�o
sMr7lbJ
ar
� t,:'q� ..P' • .dh.' eof i e ,• '�',i e�le ' e' ' n ,n •' wp. .
R �
1
i
'0
r it ri ir:r.•Ir rr r_' �
e. >� 1 r > . �_' _c b � ;r.Cl, 1 1'! ul U ea_1 a .IC •.. '
I I
7ANNi°j,i %�
��q �iQym I
1
.� •rte ;w,a„�;�
ie
✓'y" °�' '., ��rt'rt `'� -yam, �.Fr y
z
4
't
Ar.,
LV
1 h +
r.:. , \., .. of r.l. "'.at•
J 1 I
;,
`��.
•;
.,�
�;,.
., ., .
:,�.
,;
,.,''_
.::'; ::.
;F
i'
' � .� �. ..
1.�
'1 1 .i
.l � y ` �..
w
bt
• .:• •.0 t
t
I�
�1
u`
.. iF
.In 111
}lf1 .4
4 \�
J�/L
'�ryj,� i� n� /�svy,�Yj
�
■
L^ ,
1
f
r;
'..I / 1I 1.1 1 11
1 11 1 ..
11 11 I 1 Iq
'
1 11 I .,.
s
I]
CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - )JECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: ;n0,00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Pa of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Con.:: _ee will meet and taxe action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which t:Une the
Project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Huntington VillaQa
APPLICANT'S IA1,4E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: T, & G Limi-ted. TT
16371 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Phone: c/o Friedman Toaawe
MME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Friedman, Togawa, Smith,
9441 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills, CA 213- 550 -8360
Southwest IM�g.A 2800 I rI S PrZaJECT 1 `STREET ADDRESSlAND, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
Assessor's Ma Book 202, Page 181, Parcel N0.07.
Southwest corner o rc i a Ave. and Propose Victoria
street
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL. STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERAST.iS:
Tenta+iye and Final Tract Mapes Building Parmlts and
Dept. of Real Estate Approval
Y -1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION GF' PROJECT: Construction of a 120 unit
ential condominium, all units are to be 2 bedroom.
protect is to be cymp P 1 in 2 Phasf� a, as 5h awn nn th
attached development schedule.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSi;D BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Lot 1 is 4.69 acres and
Lot 2 is 3.62, for a total Proiect acreage of 8.31.
Excluding the garages, the s ware footage of the
proposed
u-2 ing is a sl a is vacan a presen .
DESCRIBE THE ENVIROVM•=— M'AL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INrroRPfi%TION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CULTMEZAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
utilized as a citris orchard which has been abandoned in
�� ��,�� • ���uG�acC inuicazes a past residence was
years ago.
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environ:neatal impact?
tan
i;
11
• WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
•
X
1.
Create a substantial change in
ground
contours?
_ _Z_
2.
Create a substantial change in
existing
noise or vibration?
x
3.
Create a substantial change it
demand for
municipal services (police, fi:.e,
water,
sewage, etc.)'.
X
4.
Create changes in the existing
zoning or
general plan designations?
Remove any existing trees? aao many?
X o. Create the need for use o:r disposal of
potentially hazardous material! such as
toxic substances, flamma.bles ox explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: All of the citrus
trees will be removed.. The trees located on the north
_ i+rOne-ty line will ho ramnup!d to imnrn.re pis + aria Cfrcot,
trees located on east property line wil l be • r .moved for
construction of 4' drainage ditch.
iMPJn ^:'Tl: If the project involves the constriction of
residential units, complete the fort on the
next- page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the ciats and
information required for this initial evaluatior to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statemer.tz, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand t-at
additional information may be required to be sub :pitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
C
RESOLUTION NO.
lack
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPiONGA, CALIFORNIA; CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11608
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11608, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by L &G Limited, II, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of Caiifornia, described as a residential subdivision
of 8.31 acres located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria
and being divided into 2 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission
for public hearing and action on Barth 25, 1931; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the fallowing findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11608 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and ;.roposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the t,Vpe of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
�I
Resolution No.
Page 2
(9) $'hat this project will rLot create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11608, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
Planning Division
1. Removal of ekcalyptus trees will be replaced with
equivalent specimen trees.
Engineering Division
2. Installation of a portion of master planned storm
drains in Archibald Avenue from its current terminus
at 13th Street to Southern Pacific Railroad, shall
be required. The Developer shall be responsible
for 50% of the cost of this work. The cost of the
storm drain will be credited to the storm drain fees
and a reimbursement agreement will be executed to
cover the remaining contributions.
3. Installation of drainage structure along existing
dirt channel from Victoria to Ramons Avenue shall
be required. All necessary on -site and off -site
drainage easements for the improvement shall be
dedicated to the City.
4. Construct full street improvements including, but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk,
drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights
on all interior streets. (A minimum of 26' wide
pavement shall be constructed on Victoria Street.
Necessary additional easements for the pavement shall
be acquired by the applicant.)
5. All existing easements lying within the future right -
of -way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per
the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation
of the tract map.
6. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of
any existing utility facility t'at would affect construction.
7. Letters of acceptance `rom downstream property owners
shall be required where runoff from the tract flows
onto private properties.
Resolution No.
Page 3
8. At the time of underground utility installation and
prior to installation o` street improvements, the_
developer shall contact the appropriate cable television
company for the area and make arrangements which would
give the cr.,pany the opportunity to install cable at
the time of trenching. If the cable television company
does not install cable, then the developer shall install
conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such
details shall be shown and verified on the improvement
plans.
Building Division
9. `surety shall be posted and an agreement executed,
guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilities
necessary for dewatering all parcels, to the satisfaction
of the Building and Safety Division.
10. Appropriate easements, for safe disposal of drainage
water that are conducted unto or over adjacent parcels,
are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction
of the Building and Safety Division.
11. On -site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering
or protecting the subdivided properties, are to be
installed prior to issuance of building permits for
construction upon any parcel that may be subject to,
or contributes to, drainage flows entering, leaving
or within a parcel relative to which a building permit
is requested.
12. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted
to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior
to issuance of building permits. (This may be on an
incremental,or composite basis.)
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1961.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY-
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST-
Secretary of the Planning Commission
Resolution No.
Page 4
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the P1anhing Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote
to -wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
E
In
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS -
Subject: _T i! .
Applicant- LM-p -
Location: sec.
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLUWING
CONDITIONS:
A. Site Development
1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file
in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permi -ts.
velo 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect -at
time of Building Permit.issuance.
—4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreas
Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards.
_ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and
located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division.
_Z6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with
view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. location shall be
subject to approval by the Planning Division.
-Z 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill
Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the
Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
Z8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division
for - review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
-JeL01019. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally
integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties
and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions.
-Z10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.
�a '
11
11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planniro Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan
shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of
shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties.
�12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall
be solar heated. —
w / 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open
spaces and recreational uses.
�14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals
kept out of public view from private and public streets.
V/ 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first
unit.
16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a
clear and concise manner, including proper ill;. : :. :nation.
�17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be
installed on each unit in this project:.
18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed an each unit.
19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted
for "a solar water heating unit.
20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be
.incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited
to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double
paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc.
_ 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a
/ solar water• heating t1Ait.
f! 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the
satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District.
23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout-
the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma.
A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum stapes,
phys -ical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City
equestrian trail standard$�_shall be-submitted to and approved by the
City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map.
_ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance .
of equestrian - trails. —
25. This project shall provide . percent of affordable housing and /or
rents, in conformance with e� neral Plan housing policies and the housing
criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall
be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels
at the time of construction of the project_ Proof of .this provision -
shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building
permits and occupancy of the units.
B. • Parking and Vehicular Access
1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension
of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall.
V"" 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size.
_3e!!""3. All two -way aisle widths shall'be a minimum of 24 feet wide.
—Z 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum
of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with
Foothill Fire District requirements.
All parking spaces shall be double striped.
6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers.
_ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked.
_jfL'018. The C.C. & P..'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on
this site unless they are the principle source of transportation fer the
owner.
9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other
than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R. 's shall be developed
by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to
issuance of building permits.
u
C. Landscaping
- -Z1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits.
_ 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of
existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be-
completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the
proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan,.
11
_ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be
trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees
® shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the.Planning Division
during the review of the Master Plan of Existing. On -Site Trees. Those
trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a
tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division.
__J,!L'4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in
accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior
streets and 20' on exterior streets.
_Z5. A minimum of 50 tre ,.�s per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
shall be provided within the development; 20q -24" box, or larger, 70 % -15
gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon.
V0'6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
_ 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and
are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with
slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such.slope
planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and
appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall
be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the
developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.
Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes
shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in
satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all
such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading
or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building
Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to
germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination.
�8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained
by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of maintenance.zY.all be submitted to the City prior to issuance
of building permits.
3. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall
be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans.
10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and
sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall
be Subject to approval by the Planning Division.
_ 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted-
within the project.
_ /12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman
si ges, and an abundance of landscaping is required along
l�rl.Qi
D. Si ns
_
—Z1.
Any signs proposed for this development sha'1 be designed in conformance
with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinancp, and _ 11 require review and approva
by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs.
2.
A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the -
Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of
Building permits.
_ 3.
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this
M
approval and will require separate sign review and approval.
E. Additional Approvals Required
_ 1.
Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit.
2.
Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map.
3.
Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval
of Zone Change and /or Variance Conditional Use Permit
4.
This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s)-at
which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conns or revoke
the Conditional Use Permit.
i S.
The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by
.purchasers of homes r:hich have a private or public equestrian trail on
or adjacent to their property.
In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract
,
on ' I have read the C.C. & R.'s and
understand that. Lot is subject to a mutual ;e-
ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian
traffic to gain access.
Signed
Purchaser
Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to
occWancy.
_Z6.
Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of
.
building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification
from all affected School Distrizts, shall be submitted to the Department of
Community Development which Mates that adequate school facilities are or
will be capable of accommoCating students generated by this project. Such
letter of certification mu;t have been issued by the School District within
sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision
map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. �.
1c1 ,.
9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section
of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation
of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
F. Site Development -
�7.
Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance
_l.
Of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the
affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or
®
will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the
r
t! 2.
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by
the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval. in
the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable
by the Santa Ana Regional Wacer Control Board and the City, written certi-
fication of acceptability, including all s,+pportive information, shall be
-
obtained and submitted to the City.
-
This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map
—ZB.
is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is
r
involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project
unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission.
9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section
of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation
of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
F. Site Development -
The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,
_l.
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval
of this project.
r
t! 2.
Prior to issua ^ce of building permits for combustible construction, evidence
shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply'
for fire protection is available.
Prior to the issuance of a buii-ing permit for a new residential dwelling
unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
-
be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee.
4.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial
r
developmen4 or addition tq,.an existing development, the applicant shall pay
development fees at the es'fablished rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan
Checking Fees.
5.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued
—`
for this project within one year from the date of project approval.
6.
Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official.
r
;
7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material
and non - combustible roof material.
_ 2. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the
street upgrade with additional wpod trim around windows and wood siding
or plan -ons where appropriate.
G. Existing Structures
_ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances
considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing building (s) shall be made to comply with current Building and
Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
_ 3. Existing sewage disposal facil•itiez; shall be removed, filled and /or capped
to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code.
H. Grading
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices.
The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the —
approved conceptual grading plan.
_jeL00�2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the
State of California to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist
and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
�4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning, Engineering-and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior
to recordation of the final subdiv4 lion map or issuance of building permit
whichever comes first.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
I. Dedications and Vehicular Access _ —
__ 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all incrior street rights -of -way
and all necessary easements as shoo-in on the tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the
following streets:
25 additional feet on Aq2u&4w2 Aye.
additional feet on �/IOQB W_
additional feet on
J.
Ell
V'00'3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards.
_- 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as
_Z5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over
pri%v(ate roads, drives, or parking areas. ft { tI({y( t�e
6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal
circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the
property or in the operation of the proposed business.
Street Improvements
1. Construct full street improvements. including, but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street
lights on all interior streets.
�2_ Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to:
STREET NAME
CURB &
GUTTER
A.C.
PVMT.
SIDE-
WALK
DRIVE
APPR.
STREET
LIGHTS I
A.C.
OVERLAY
WHEEL
CHAIR RAMPS
OTHER .
�
✓
L00001
- - --
Vol
yen aa�
"d
3. Prior to any work being perfcrmed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment
permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
V� 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements,
prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _
5. Surely shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the City= Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public
improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever comes first.
1%"0'6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City
Engineer, prior to occupancy.
�7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
Per the requirements of the City Engineer.
K. Drainage and Flood Control
1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage
facilities required by the City Engineer.
" 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations:
____ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding
under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions
-of the program and City Ordinance No. 24.
4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect
the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street.
1" 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying
streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type
drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or
landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line.
- ¢XHfL® ftft .
L. Utilities
_AZ 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground
including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. -
2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving
utility companies and the City Engineer.
d 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public
utilities, as required. -
4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in
accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards.
5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet
requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire
District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San
Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to
recordation.
6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested
agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any
requirements that may be received from them.
M. General Reauireme
1. Permits
A.
B.
C.
D.
its and Approvals
from other agencies will be required as follows:
Caltrans for:
County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading perm
San Bernardino County Flood Control District
Other:
�J
,4
r,.
2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles
of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of
the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to
the City.
3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering cost:
involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer.
4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
Z.-- —
E.
CITY OF CANCHO CUCWUI ,A
STP FP 1EP01 r'
DATE: March 25, 1981
TO: Planding Commission:
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Plinner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant planner
' "A:yo
�.
o o
E'- • � � z
J77
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEPT P.ND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
81 -04 - VINEYARD BANK - The development of a temporary
bank facility on 5.69 acres in the C -2 zone located
180' south of Foothill Blvd. on the west side of Vine-
yard Ave - APN 207- 21' -12
ABSTRACT: The applicant is -- quc,ting review and approval for the
development of a temporary bank fa:ility located south of Foothill
Blvd., on the west side of Vineyari Avenue. The bank will consist of
modulyr units combined for a total of a 3,600 sq. ft. full service
bank % facility.with drive -thru aid walk -up services. The project
has been reviewed by the Design and Development Review Committees and
has undergone many revisions per tieir comments. Staff has reviewed
the project and recommended condit-ons of e.pp ^oval for your review and
consideration.
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval for
the development of a temporary bank facility on 5.69 acres of land
located approximately 1801 south of Foothill Blvd. on the west side
of Vineyard Avenue (Exhibit "A ").
DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing the construction of a 3,600
sq. ft. full service banking facility which will include a walk -up
and drive -up facility along with an automatic teller machine. The
bank building will consist of 5 modilar units pre - designed and con-
structed to meet the applicants requirements (Exhibit "B "). The pro-
ject site is bounded on all sides by vacant land, with the exception
of a single family residence approxinately 160' south of the bank
site. The property is presently zoned C -2 kGeneral Business Commercial and
the Interim and Proposed General Plays designate this site for commerci 1
uses. The project site is presently vacant of any buildings or signifi
cant vegetation, and the existinq grade slopes from the north to the
south at approximately a 3% grade, a: indicated on Exhibit "G ".
The applicant is requesting approval for a one -year period of time
for the temporary facility. The applicant intends to construct a
permanent facility to be located in the vic'nity of the temporary
building site. The permanent facility will oecome part of the shop-
ping center planned for this southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and
Vineyard Avenue (Exhibit '•C ").
ITEM D
CUP 81 -04 -2- 3 -25 -81
Staff Report
ANALYSIS: The project site is adequate in size and shape to ac-
commodate the proposed use as shown on the development plan, All
ouilding setbacks, landscaped areas, and parking areas are being
designed and provided in accor�ance with adopted City Standards
and Ordinances. The illustrative site plan, as sho-M in Exhibit
"B" indicates that the applicant intends to provide mounding and
abundant landscaping along the street frontage and throughout the
entire site.
Access to the site is being provided by a single driveway located
near the southern edge of the project site. Fourteen feet of dedi-
cation will be required along Vineyard Avenue for street widening
purposes. In accordance with the master plan of streets and high-
ways, Vineyard Avenue will be widened on both sides and provided
with paving overlay. AC berms, and striping for a left turn pocket.
In addition, the entire frontage portion of the bank property shall
be widened and provided with concrete curbs, and meandering side-
walks. The development plans as proposed would require a total of
18 parking spaces and the development plans indicate a total of 29
parking spaces being provided and one loading space.
The elevations, as shown on Exhibit "D" indicate the use of T1 -11
siding with a light stain,, a dark stained mansard wood roof, with
varying overhangs, smoke glazed glass with dark anodized aluminum
frames, and low profile stuccoed walls at entryways and ramps.
The applicant has indicated that in addition to screening provided
by the mansard roofline, that additional architecturally integrated
screenwalls will be provided to adequately screen any roof mounted
equipment. It is recommended that the design of any screens for
roof mourtej equipment be reviewed and approved by the City Planper
prior to issuance of building permits. The illustrative site plan
indicates an abundance of landscaping will be provided for the pro-
ject. Colored elevations and building materials samples will be
available at the Planning Commission meeting.
As the Commission will recall, in the past, temporary buildings
were approved for one year with the possibility of a one year ex-
tension. It is recommended that this te,nparary bank facility be
approved for a one -year period, and that a condition be added re-
quiring submission of plans for a permanent structure at least
six months prior to the expiration date, unless an additional one-
E
CUP 81 -04 -3- 3 -25 -81
Staff Report
year extension is granted by the Planning Commission prior to
that time.
The Design Review Committee worked with the applicant to formulate
the design which is presently before the Commission. The Committee
recommends approval of the design and that emphasis be given to
landscaping throughout the site.
Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant is pro-
vided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part
II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant adverse
impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the
Commission concurs with such findings, then issuance of a Negative
Declaration would be in order.
CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the
Daily Report newspaper on March 13, 1981, and ten (10) public
hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within
300 feet of the , •oject site. To date, no correspondence has been
received either for or against this project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
consider all of the input and material relative to this project.
If the Commission finds that this project is developed in accor-
dance with the adopted Standards and Ordinances and does not
adversly effect adjacent property, then a motion to approve the
attached Resolution of Approval with the conditions wouid be in
order.
Re4ectf!:lly submitted,
ty
BKH :DC:cd
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Illustrative Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Master Plan
Exhibit "D" - Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Perspective
Exhibit "F" - Perspective
Exhibit "G" - Conceptual
Grading Plan.
Part I - Initial Study
Resolution of Approval
Conditions
�
i
. • r . - e _ . w . r w ..
.. Y : w • .
r Y Y.. w •Y� Y h a. w
.nwww +s/r want
rw•w•ar. wrnrwrw��.•wwrar
����
�
a s L a � r a s �
•
1
s
�natis -�mea�nne yn +s�riwona
�va�eoaKav�aar�a�su
.
Ell
0
f
o � o
m
l8 LSD U VI
I 4 41
�
p� po o a
HIM 111111
LINpIII!LiU L9�lIllin
� I 11 I WHIMMIlu
43 41
[A ILLM
lui o 0o 0
0 4 o MI
0 0
Cb
�68 x 88 —48•
2
n
C
8
c
f
s
a
IY
2
r
J
g
Si
i
2
n
C
8
c
f
s
a
IY
2
r
J
g
Si
, I
K. 4 � :. r . a. �� .r •; � •';y iii.
1•• � `t �J4 1 2• ��I ',�11' , �
Y
5 Y
L` Ihl
v
1 � r
jC. —�.. -' _�.�1.1J�31j!`j' •jay 1.
III, i�1�1,
` 1 1
1
ye its
` iY I1�`jralr 1
7 �I l
it
r� ,{,IJw r� ��1�•����1��� C� 1�x'1
Y t1
t[ l
j .yf'h�• Rv k� 1+ (! n {' �?� ?�fpl��j�Y�' -7 � ��•1 l(�, '��
isE
=�`
l
a+ +�
a, f�41i1^',,: l
<+
r
r
1
E
E
e � �
1
- --------- 7
mom
tit
1 j
�C1Y.il•.6G� �R.S.C9'.fd
g �
1—
1
V
e "
It
9 +Eip
s
a
. �• 1Mf iV.rn +lYlY PWMV ..
pQ
W
qj
)M
g
R
r.
•a
0 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION ,r,HEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial S'_od'y. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard_ The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The E;.nject will have an dnvironmental impact
and an Environmental Impact iteport will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROTECT TITLE: Vineyard National Ban ( in organization )
APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
Steven Ricbard Sensenbach 8681 Wseline Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
714 987 =0177
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: as above if unable to cmj;L�
contact the property owner: Mr. Gilbe-t Rodriguez 714 985 -0958
MCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSL•'SSOR PARCEL NO.)
South of the S/W Corners of Foothill and. Vineyard Ave. facing Vi,nevagd.
#207/21/12
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE ADD
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
• �Stsf�: ( T1?nt _ of lvniei n4admi.n l Permi t : T_D.—T D.—Tag-ass' to I i t°
Federal: Comptroller of Currency: Authorization to organize was rte_
Aug. 1980. -
PROJL'CT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Erect a new 3600 s"a ft modular
bldg. to }r used as a full service ranlc?nn facility. Bldq.
will i^pn�i Gt cif fi�.c (Sl i?S:fifl' ;mii•c nl a inr7nA � -
1 n i�
drive -in znd walkup service area.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS: IF AVY- + fill be 30 rat. ft.
{.,e �p��Q L,CW D1 60
DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMIENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLALITS (TREES)
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDT'NIG PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUC`i. %RES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
"-PreSellt: UllimtSrr sori ,recant- Iand
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series"
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
;Z2.
11
11
u
WILL THIS PROJECT:
. YES D10 ..
1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
XX 2. Create a substantial change in c<xisting
noise or vibration?
?aC 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)'.
74c
4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
XX 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? NOM
_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any 'YFS answers above: - N/A
IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of 1
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
DateFeb. 3, 1961 Signatureci�d',.
Steven R. senbaCh
Title Drncin�
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 81 -04 FOR A TEMPORARY BANK
LOCATED 180 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL ON THE
WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD IN THE C -2 -T ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 6th day of February, 1981, a complete application
was filed by Vineyard Bank for review of the above - described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project-.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed;
and,
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse
impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on
March 25th, 1981.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -04 is
approved subject to the following conditions.and attached Standard
Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION:
1. The temporary Bank facility is approved for a one -year
period from the issuance of building permits and shall
be removed from the site and the site appropriately
restored, unless an extension of time in accordance
with Commission policy, is approved.
IL. I
Resolution No.
Page 2
2. If a permanent facility is desired, then appropirate
plans must be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission in time to allow for construction and completion
of the permanent facility prior to the expiration of the
approval for the temporary facility.
3. If screens are needed for roof mounted equipment, then
they shall be constructed with like building materials
to provide a solid screen. The final design must be
submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits.
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:
4. Improvement of Vineyard Avenue with asphalt concrete
pavement beyond the subject parcel shall be required
as follows:
a. Widen west side of the street with A.C. berm
at the edge to 30 -foot half street width from
north parcel line to Foothill Boulevard.
b. Widen eastside of the street to provide for two
through lanes and a 5 -foot wide half left turn
pocket, from south parcel line to the proposed
driveway with 150 -foot incoming and outgoing
flare to meet existing pavement.
C. Restripe affected lane's lines and left turn
pocket to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
5. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of
any existing utility facility -that would affect construction.
6. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.
Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City standards.
7. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and
disposal of surface drainage entering the property
from adjacent areas.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST: 9
Secretary of the Planning Commission
2
�F'-
i'
;L.
Resolution No.
Page 3
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of- R;;ncho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dul :r and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissi m of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
°YES COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
•;ti
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEI.OPMENT
STA14DARD CONDITIONS
��igsl
Applicant -�_k'
location:T�� !n(&e r(,j�,_ !� VJAbsymo
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. Site Development
Z1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approveo site plans on file
in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
�ZZ. Revised site plans and bolding elevations incorporating al conditic•.� of
approval shall be submittel to tine Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
__Z3. Approval of t;:'s request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning iir^inance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect —at
time of Bu•116i-.9 Permit_ issuance.
Ank
4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation
Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards.
_ 5. Pail boxes, in areas where sidewalks a -e required, shall be installed and
located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division.
6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a u foot high masonry wall with
view obstructing gales pursuant to City standards. Location shall be
subject to approval by the Planning Division.
7. If dwellings are to be constnicted in an area designated by the Foothill
Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the rocf materials must be approved by the
Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
_ 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division
for—review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
/9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally
integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent. properties
and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions.
—/10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to
the satisfaction of the Director •,f Community Development.
A detailed liahting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan
shall indicate style, it %minatioo, location, height and method of
shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties:
All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall
be solar heated.
Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to ccnnect dwellings with open
spaces and recreational uses.
All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals
kept out of public viEw from private and public streets.
Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first
unit.
All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a
clear and concise manner, i•; ^iuding proper illumination.
Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be
installed on each unit in this project.
Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on eaci_ unit.
All --nits within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted
for a solar water heating unit.
Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be
incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited
to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double
paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc.
This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a
solar water heating unit.
Emergency secondary access shall be provided co this tract to the
satisfac`,.ion of the Foothill Fire Protection District.
Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout
the tract in accordance with -the Equestrian Trail Plan for ..lta Loma.
A Jetailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum sl-opes,.
phys-ical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City
equestrian trail standards..-shall be- submitted to and approved by the
City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final rap.
This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance
of equestrian trails.
25. This project shall provide . percent of affordable housing and /or
rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing
criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shat;
AlIft he dctnr minnil by ".~nnly m�rL °t °.'.tcS, rciits at�u' ItCd iall IIII.Vism ievCf]
qW at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision -
shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building
permits and occupancy of the units. _
B. Parking and Vehicular Access
1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension
of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall.
/2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size.
3. All two-way aisle widths shall be a minimum of feet wide.
�4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum
of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with
Foothill Fire District requirements.
5. All parking spaces shall be double striped.
6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage jcor openers.
7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked.
8. The G.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on
this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the
Owner.
9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior ciruia *.ion aisle other
than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed .
by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to
issuance of building-per-nits.
C. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be - -bmitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Existing trees shall be retained .wherever possible. A master plan of
existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be-
completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into acrount the
proposes: grading and shall be required to be submitted tc, and approved
by the Planning Division prior to approval of the finr.l grading plan.
4t t
f
1
3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be
trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees
shall be approved for removal at the descretion of :.he Planning Division
during the review of the Mas per Plan of Existimo O)n -Site Tree Those
trees which are approved foi- removal may be rega.`;red to be replaced on a
tree -for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division.
—/4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in
accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior
streets and 20' on exterior streets.
_ 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15
gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon.
—/6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
_ 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and
are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with
slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such.slope
planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and
appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall
be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the
developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied b_ the buyer.
Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes
shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in
satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all AML
such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon compl tion of grading
or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building
,ffir-;al. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to
germiratF. the seed and to a point 6 months after germination.
8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained
by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. SL:--h
proof of maintenance -shall be submitted to the City prior to issaance
of building permits.
—9. The front yard landscaping, aad an appropriate irrigation system, shall
be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans.
_ 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and
sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall
be 3L•bject to approval by the ° 1 Division.
�J
V*"' 11. A minimum of s 0 : specimen size trees shall be planted
within the project.
12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman
size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along
11
D. Lim!_
—/1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance
spa ...: . ��- ^ - -- -- -_.._ .
�.. he a.vwN� a Jefis s vc 'gii yr di nance and sha I 1 require review end approval
by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs.
2. A uniform sign program for this development shall. be submitted to the -
Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of
Building permits.
3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with th-.s
approval and will require separate sign review and approval..
E. Additional Approvals Required
_ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit.
2. C .ector Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map.
_ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval
of Zone Change and /or Variance Conditional Use Permit
-4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of months) at
which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke
the Conditional Use Permit.
_ 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by
.purchasers of Fomes which have a private or public equestrian trail on
or adjacent to their prope.•ty.
In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract ,
on , I have read the C.C. & R.'s and
understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re-
ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian
traffic to gain access.
Sioncd
Purchaser
Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to
occupancy.
6. Prior to approvai and recordation of the final :nap. or prior to issuance of
building permits, wh^n no subdivision map is involved, written certification
from all affected Sct,.ol Districts, shall be submitted tL the Department of
Community Development ohich s..ates that adequate school facilities are or
will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such
letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within
sixty (60) days prior to the final map approvai in the rase of the subdivision
map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance
of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the
affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or
will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the d
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by
the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in
the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable
by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi-
fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be
obtained and submitted to the City.
-
—8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map
is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is
involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project
unless an extension has been granted by the Planr:ing Commission.
9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section
of the Growth Management Ordinance nrior to final approval and recordation
of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
F. Site Development -
_Z1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval
of this project_
_Z2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence
shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief thzt water supply'
for fire protection is available.
_ 's. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling
units) or major, addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee.
_Z4. Pri4.r to the ::.suance of a building permit for a new comri,erciai or industrial
development or addition t9, „an existing development, the applicant shall pay
development fees at the eSEablished rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan
Checking Fees.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issue
for this project within one year from the date of project approval.
/6. Street names and addresses shall be proviA d by the building official.
0
G.
7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material
and non - combustible roof material.
S. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the
street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood
or play -ons where appropriate.
Existing Structures
1.
_ 2.
_ 3.
H. Grading
—Z 1.
® _Z2.
_ 3.
�4.
siding
Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances
considering use, area and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings.
Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with curren_ Building and
Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped
to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordant- with the Jniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices.
The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the -
appeoved conceptual grading plan.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer Licensed by the
State of California to perform such work.
A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist
and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning, Engineering_and Building Divisions and shall be completed prio!-
to recordation of the fin-al subdivision mad or issuance of building permit
whicf:ever comes first.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
I. Dedications and Vehicular Access
1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way
and all necessary easements as shown in the tentative map.
2. Deaication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way ot, the
following streets:
I
9 + additional feet on
additional feet on
additional feet on
` 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards.
4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as
follows:
_ 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access -j all parcels over
private roads, drives, or parking areas.
6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engvess and internal
circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the
property or in the operation of the proposed business.
J. Street Improvements
I. Construct full street improvements including, but not limite' to, curb and
gutter, A.C_ pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street
A. lights on all interior streets.
d 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to:
STREET NAME
CURB &
GUTTER
A.C.
PVMT.
SIDE-
WALK
DRIVE
APPR.
STREET
LIGHTS
A.C.
OVERLAY
WHEEL
CHAIR RAMPS
OTHER .
0000*
.-
0001*
goo
__-e3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment
permit �tnd fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
_Z4. Street improvement: plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements,
prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _
5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the City'"-Attorney, guarante -ing completion of the pvblic`-
improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever comes first.
6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City
Engineer, prior to occupancy.
_wZ7 - Pavement btriping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per the requirements of the City Engineer. 0
;A
K. Drainage and Flood Control
1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage
- facilities required by the City Engineer.
2. Intersection drains will be required at.the following locations:
_,Z3 . The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding
under the MaCional Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions
'of the program and City Ordinance Mo. 24.
_.4r 4. A drainage channel .and /or• flood protection wall -Ali[ be required to protect
the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street.
5. The fullowing north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying
streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type
drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or
landscaped earth berms and -rolled•driveways at property line.
L. Utilities -
1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground
including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. -
2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving
B utility companies and the City Engineer.
d 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public
utiiities, as required.
® 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in
accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards.
5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet
requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (MD), Foothill Fire
District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San
Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to
recordation.
6_ approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested
agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any
requirements that may be received from them.
M. General Recutrements and Approvals -
1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
_ A. Caltrans for:
B. County Oust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit)
C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District
D. Other:
_ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC,&R's) and Articles
of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to Lhe approval of
the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to
the Citv.
pR�Of �9oA
—Z3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form dLandscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs
involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer.
— 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
is
+1
E
CITY OF It A NCHO CUCArVJONGA
Mr-r REPORT
DATE: March 25, 1981
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Bar.•y K. Hogan, City Plann
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior '444-cam
SUBJECT: ENVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SITE APPROVAL NO. 81-01
LORD -SHOBE rIMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH - The construction
of a 5,000 sq. ft. church building on 2.07 acres of
land in the R -1 zone lc ited on the south side of 19th
Street, between Amethyst and Archibald - APN 202- 111 -19
ITEM E
ABSTRACT: The Immanuel Baptist Churct: ha_ been working with the Design
and Development Review Committees to formulate a site plan and a con-
ceptual subdivision on the project site as described above. The Design
Review Committee and Staff are not convinced that the present site plan
and site configuration is the best alternative for the development of a
church at this location. Therefore, Staff has prepared an analysis of
the issues and provided the Commission with : -veral options so that
direction can be gained frua� the full Commission for completion and
processing of this application.
BACKGROUND: The Immanuel Baptist Church is requesting approval for
The development of a 5,000 sq. ft. church building on approximately 2
acres of land located on the south side of 15th Street between Amethyst
and Archibald (Exhibit "A "). Recently, the church submitted a parcel
map for the division of the church site from the remaining portion of
the site. The Planning Commission tentatively approved the parcel rap
with the condition that final recordation of the map cannot occur until
a precise site plan for the church facility has been reviewed and approved
by the Planning '.ommission. At the time of review of the parcel map, the
Commission was concerned with i.,e site configuration of the church. The
Commission felt there could be potential nuisances created because of the
lot pattern thai, was proposed adjacent to the church. The site is pre-
sently zoned R -1 (single family residential) and is planner. for low
density residential uses. The site is presently vacant and is bordered
on the easy by an existing single family residential development and on
the south by a mobile home park.
ANALYSIS: The Design Review Committee has met with the applicants on
severs occasions to discuss two issues:
1. The configuration of the site and how it w411 relate
to a subdivision around the church facility, and;
2. The architectural design of the church structure.
ITEM E
SA 81 -01 _2- 3 -25 -81
Staff Report
The Design Review Committee felt that they could not provide a positive
recommendation on the site configuration for the church facility as pro-
posed (Exhibit "B "). The Committee felt that the configuration of the
church site may cause potential nuisances to lots that would be created
around the church site. The Committee feels that there are alternative
configurations that could be utilized to reduce the amount of disturb-
ances or nuisances that could occur with church at this location. The
site plan as proposed is placing the church facility basically between
an area which is planned and an area which is totally developed as
single family residential. The Committee had concerns that several of
the lots may _xperience disturbances relative to church activities_
Staff has prepared two alternative prcposals which show that additional
church site configurations in this area can mitigate the land use
compatibility problems. Alternatives "A" and "B" are provided for
discussion purposes only. There are probably several other different
variations of these two alternatives which could be used to help mitigate
land use compatibility problems associated withlhis project. The appli-
cant is responsible to provide the final design solution which will
satisfy the Commissions concerns.
The questions before the Commission are:
Is this an appropriate location for a church facility of this
nature?
If the Commission feels this is rin appropriate location for a
church facility, is the present proposal by the applicant ac-
ceptable to the Commission?
3. if the present proposal by the applicant is not desirable, what
direction can the Commission give �Vo the applicant that would
satisfy the concerns expressed?
Of the two alternatives prepared by Staff, alternative "B creates a
better separation of the church facility from the existing residential
and planned residential. Alternative "A ", or variations of alternative
"A ", essentially creates a sandwich situation with the church facility
squeezed between single family residential uses.
11
E
11
SA 81 -01
Staff Report
-3-
3 -25 -81
The second issue which the Design Review Committee has been dealing with
is the architectural design of the structure. The original design was
proposed to be an all metal structure which the Committee felt was not
compatible with the character of the area. The applicant has been
revising the architectural design to limit the amount of metal used on
the structure to provide a more compatible design with the residential
character of the area. The applicant is willing to continue working
with the Design Review Committee to resolve all their concerns on the
architecture of the structure.
The applicant is seeking direction from the Commission on the above -
discussed issues. The options availat'e to the Commission are as
follows:
1. Find that the project site is nc,` a suitable location for a
church facility and deny the site approval (Resolution of
denial is attached), or;
2. Find that the present proposal meets tt -i desires and concerns
of the community and direct Staff to prepare final ccncitions
of approval for your adoption, or;
3. Indicate that this area may be an appropriate site for a church
facility but the present configuration is not acceptable in
which the Commission would provide appropriate direction to the
applicant for the preparation of alternative solutions and
designs to the church facility.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daisy Report
newspaper as a public hearinq item. In addition, public hearing notices
have been mailed to surrounding property owners wihtin 300 feel of the
project site. To date, we have received no written or oral communication
regarding this development.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct
a public hearing to consider all input and aspects of this project. After
review and consideration of the issues presented, it is recommended that
the Planning Commission provide the appropriate direction.
BKH :MV.cd
Attachments: Exhibit
A -
Location Map
Exhibit F
- Preliminary Grading
Exhibit
B -
Site Plan
and Drainage Plan
Exhibit
f. -
Conceptual Landsacpe
Plan Ex. G -
Alternative "A"
Exhibit
D -E
- Bldg. Elevations
Ex. i -
Alternative "B"
Resolution
of Denial
1
Y
^
1. �.
,
,�
1
}
� i
r.,
1
,J
', °ir'
�
y
1%
1,
L
�
+:
���•, y...,.
.��
1 '
�"`
,,
I
D,
� "i.: �.
1
I
' �
.f
�
I
�' '.
1 �'
a�
� '1
w1
R..
Y
^
1. �.
,
'
1
}
� i
r.,
1
.,.
', °ir'
� �;`,
y
1%
L
�
+:
���•, y...,.
.��
,
,,
`
� "i.: �.
' �
C
�
�' '.
1 �'
a�
��
1. �.
.
'
1
}
� i
r.,
.,.
', °ir'
� �;`,
�
1
+:
���•, y...,.
.��
,
,,
`
� "i.: �.
C
1 �'
a�
� '1
w1
R..
D.
�
1.
1',..
���;
�
l J`'.
�'i
11
4
q �� �'•
�✓
Ir'
IP ��
l
(�i
1�.� '.
���,
^�,�� 5
I
,
7
rf
l' 11 ♦ ` :' A
i7AV
i
ItK
V�b
1TXL4 fit Cl VP-
�($!1 w F"
Chad
ZF
Z.
�, wm
�2
11
E
I
n
LA
i s -41+ ale#
A c
c �a P i'1f GAI A
I
s
0 � 1
7 14 Q� 47 Ifr
9 CIA ILTOAI
!o
/it 1 tit 1 * 114 1 Is i
ALT E RNATIV ' A
lb I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION DENYING SITE APPROVAL NO. 81 -01 FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF 19TH BETWEEN AMETHYST AND ARC.HIBALD IN
THE R -1 ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1981, a complete application
was filed by Immanuel Baptist Church for review of the above- described
project; and
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings cannot be met:
1. That the proposed use may be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: Therefore, this request is hereby denied by the
Planning Commission.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
0
11
CITY Or RANCHO CUCANIONGA
S7AFF REPORT
DATE: March 25, 1981
TO: Plannivg Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Otto Krouti"., Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
THE DEVELOPERS - A residential subdivision of Ib.t acres
of land into 38 custom lots in the R -1 -12 zone; located
south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of
Calle Corazon - APN 207 - 101 -37 and 207 - 092 -10
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of a 38 lot, 15.7
acre custom lot subdivision, generally located south and east of Red
Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon (Exhibit "A "). The
project site is currently vacant, and slopes south and southeasterly
with a maximum relief of about 100 feet. The site has a moderate
growth of grass, weeds, shrubs, and some trees. Along the southeast
boundary, the site abuts the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way
and tracks.
The proposal has been reviewed as a custom lot subdivision by 'the
Growth Management Review Committee in accordance with the Growth
Management Ordinance, and received a point rating in excess of the
required threshold. However, the conceptual grading plan has not
yet been cleared by the Grading Committee due to several concerns
and issues described in this report.
ANALYSIS: The proposed custom lot subdivision, shown on Exhibit
A'r l is co�:sistent with both Interim and Proposed General Plan Land
Use designations of Low Density Residential. The surrounding land
uses and zoning are described as follows.
LAND USE
ZONING
Site Vacant R -1 -12
North Single Family R -1 -12
East Railroad, Vacant F -P
South Railroad, Vacant A -P and R -1
West Multi- Family, Condos R -3 -T
The subdivision map has been prepared in accordance with the State Sub-
division Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The basic street
pattern has been predetermined, to a degree, by the existence of Camino
Predera on the north. A secondary access is needed which most logically
ITEM F
TT 10035
Staff Report -2- March 25,'1981
should occur off Red Hill Country Club Drive in the northwest
portion of the site. Further, due to the substantial grades the
subdivision designs are rather limited. As requested by Staff, a
topographic model has been prepared by the applicant for the Com-
mission's review.
Since this Tract Map was filed, the applicant has worked closely
with Staff to resolve a number of concerns. However, in spite of
a substantial effort to resolve potential problems, the following
areas of concern remain to be resolved, and should be addressed
by the Commission:
1. Grading - The applicant is proposing substantial 11 to 1 fill
slopes on lots 2 through 9 on the down -side of the proposed
street, as well as moderate 2 to 1 fill slopes on several lots
on the up -side. Staff is concerned with the future develop-
ment of lots 1 through 9; as can be easily seen on the topo-
graphic model the nature of the grade would necessitate split -
level construction with garages possibly located within the
front yard setbacks (Exhibit "C "). Should this subdivision be
approved, Staff would recommend that appropriate restrictions
be recorded with the subdivision map which would enable the
Commission and /or the Design Review Committee to retain strict
control over the development of each of these parcels. In
addition, the grading plan should also be revised to eliminate
slopes in excess of 2 to 1.
Geolo is�WV-ds - Due to the site's proximity to the inferred
ocal tion of the Red Hill Fault the project site is located with-
in the Special Study Zone. According to the proposed General
Plan Public Health and Safety Super Element, restrictions which
apply within State designated Fault Special Studies zones also
apply to the City adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill
Fault. As required, a report prepared by a certified engineering
geologist. has been prepared and submitted to the City (Exhibit
"D "). The report concludes that no faults, active or potentially
active, were observed in exploratory trenches or are known to
exist within, the subject site. The Red ' Hill
Fault is inferred to pass some 750 feet south-
erly of the site. The report further concludes that the
E
TT 10035
Staff Report -3- March 25, 1981
probability of ground surface rupture is considered remote.
However, it is recommended that a condition be placed on the
map to require the Building Official to critically review each
unit's structural integrity and if necessary, require increased
structural standards.
3. Landscape Maintenance - Appropriate provisions should be made
for the disposition and maintenance of areas adjacent to the
two existing single family residenc-s on Red Hill Country Club
Drive which are not needed for right -of -way purposes. Available
options include:
a. Extra wide parkways with low maintenance landscaping and
inclusion of such areas in a 'landscape maintenance district.
b. Traisfer cf ownership of the unneeded areas to the adjacent
® property owners, if they so desire.
c. Inclusion of the two areas in lots 1 and 38. This option
does not aPpcar practical due to potential maintenance
problems.
�LJ
ni+ '
R+
The transfer of ownership optionappears to be preferable, however,
should the adjacent property owners refuse the left -over areas,
inclusion of the areasin a maintenance district is recommended.
Also attached for your review is Part I of the Initial Study as completed
by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the
Environmental Checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Pending
satisfactory resolution of the grading and seismic safety issues described
in this report, the issuance of a Negative Declaration, with appropriate
mitigation measures, would be appropriate.
CORRESPONDENCE: The 'tentative map has been advertised as a public
hearing item in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately
70 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet
of the proposed subdivision. To date, no correspondence has been received.
TT 10035
Staff Report
-4-
March 25, 1981
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct
a public hearing to receive all public comments. If, after such hearing,
it is felt that the areas of concern raised by Staff have been resolved
to the Commission's satisfaction, the adoption of the attached Resolution
of Approval, with conditions, would be appropriate.
or'"; vn:ca
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map
Exhibit "8" - Tract Map
Exhibit "C" - Cross Sections
Exhibit "D" - Geologist's Report
Initial Study, Part I
Resolution of Approval
Conditions of Approval
A
A
i
Stitt o11
di. ■dpMf �r .. •
4roQ z•- - =�Iri it . ■.C., ,
a�i: =:r fir/ u � ,G� `�0�.�►'�` I: _= me =
gas
i�a� =� r. .iii,
►g � �A. /. �■�G ♦ ��/ X -- .•.
111 �1- 1*�,.� ♦ _ .. ■ — ..rl� '
PENN
V 1 IX
�>-' 'e � \Y� .'.SRO' 1\ ,` \�` \ •" .� �. I1e.1��
V. N -
r , u / T \ • h� ,\
" =� .LF• � � I I = Y/ —�r�/ , � I\\ is '\ " \ \./.`1 \ .
1 � , fe� � ••4\ \ - `. � x,11 1 � � I l j � � -
v$
0
1I—
[r
�>-' 'e � \Y� .'.SRO' 1\ ,` \�` \ •" .� �. I1e.1��
V. N -
r , u / T \ • h� ,\
" =� .LF• � � I I = Y/ —�r�/ , � I\\ is '\ " \ \./.`1 \ .
1 � , fe� � ••4\ \ - `. � x,11 1 � � I l j � � -
u
13
1
9�
M111 Arai dal I W, 'I
t Y3 i'
• " tip:,,
Yip
4
am
C']
R
tL•• O
—
+I
Il —
Ir
9�
M111 Arai dal I W, 'I
t Y3 i'
• " tip:,,
� •rye -b `\ �\ \ 1
y
'tea
=1'•F9 _J
Yip
4
am
C']
R
$pax
c
tgt
Jill
ld
J
ld %•,i
>
NIN
Co
� •rye -b `\ �\ \ 1
y
'tea
=1'•F9 _J
■ ■
i
■ Y
A -A
Oub dR. ,
LR /fR /KIT•
,r e
CIA
Jul%
1 Dti
LR /FR /BQ
FIN 15H
��►
CITY OF 1TE%t:
PLANNING DIVISIQV Lxiiti3tT: G SGILt c
a;
F!
307 MINNESOTA AVE.
�RAM0UNT, CALIF. 9072--
Prt-ject No. 611 -080
SOILS ENG/NEER/NG- ENG/NEERING GEOLOGY
Action Engineering Consultants
5402 -A Commercial Drive
Huntington Beach, California 92649
Subject Reference: Tentative Tract 10035
Rancho Cucamonga
California
Gentlemen:
(213) 633 -6152
August 27, 1980
This is to repc:t the results of a geology and seismicity
study of the above referenced property. According to the State
of California Special Studies Zone Maps, the subject property is
not within an area suspected to be underlain by traces of an '
active earthquake fault, however, known or inferred faults are
reported to pass near the site. In order to determine whether a
trace of a fault is present in the near surface soils, an explora-
tory trench was excavated across the site, and the earth materials
encountered were carefully examined and logged. Orientation of
the trench was made in order to intercept any suspected trace at
nearly right angles to the trench. Plate 1 depicts the location
of the site relative to general topography, nearby streets and
landmarks, while Plate 2 presents a graphic log of the earth
materials encountered in the trench.
GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SETTING
The property is situate) on the south flank of bd Hill, at
Ij
I
II
i
w Action Engineering -2-
611 -020
an average elevation of 1300 feet abov! sea level.
As disclosed by the exploratory tench, numerous outcrops,
and reference to published geologic literature, the site is immedi-
ately underlain by deposits of older aLluvium and fanglomerates.
These deposits are reported to overlie a thick Tertiary sedimentary
section and granitic basement rocks at depth.
FAULTS
Major earthquake faults known to axist in southern California
are shown on Plate 3. Table One lists faults considered "active ",
that is, faults which break all format.ons, including alluvium,
have an observable topographic expression, and have undergone
movement accompanied by earthquakes duxing historic time, or have
been so designated as active by the State of California, Division
of Mines and Geology.
No faults, active or potentially active were observed in the
exploratory trenches or a.) known to exist within the subject
property. No faults, offset strata, or indications of post ground
movement were apparent in the natural ea.:th materials as exposed
in the trenches.
The Red Hill fault is reported to pzss some 750 feet southerly
of the site. No traces of this fault or any other were encountered
in the near surface deposits of the sub'e:t
J property. �
SEISMICITY
ry Tables One and Plate 3, attached, have been developed from �11
various sources to show the distance to known active and potentially
Action Engineering _3-
611 -•080
active faults in southern California considered pertinent to the
site. The sources of information include prominent textbooks.!on
geology and seismicity, state and county publications, as well
as data disseminated by both public and private agencies involved
with earthquake measuring and monitoring. While not all sources
agree on all items due to the "state of the art" at the present
time, the tables and plates included in this report are believed
to present a fair and reasonable evaluation of the available data.
Plotted or estimated epicenters of recorded larger magnitude
earthquakes, which have taken place in southern California since
1769, are presented on Plate 3. The major and most recent reference
concerning the geology of the area, "Geologic Hazards in South-
western San Bernardino County, California ", 1976, C.D.M.G. Special
Report 1130 indicate that the maximum credible rock accelerations
to be anticipated at the site earthquakes in the vicinity of South-
western San Bernardino County are generated by a 8.5 magnitude
earthquake or the San Andreas fault, 0.40g, generated by a 7.5
magnitude earthquake on the San Jacinto fault, 0.41g, and generated
by a 6.5 :magnitude earthquake on the Cucamonga fault, 0.558.
Distance's from the site to known major faults are presented
on Table 1.
Groundwater
Reference to published literature indicates that groundwater
levels are in excess of 50 feet below the site surface.
0
Action Engineering
611 -080
SECONDARY SEISMIC HAZARDS
Liquefaction: Ground failure due to liquefaction is considered
highly unlikely since groundwater lies at a depth below which
liquefaction can occur. The near surface soils do not appear
to be subject to liquefaction even if saturated.
Earthquake Induced Landslides: No existing landslides which
could be reactivated by earthquake forces are present on the
site. No imminent slides were observed on the subject
property or on immediately adjacent properties.
Tsunamis: The site is located approximately 50 miles from
the ocean, at an elevation of 1300 .feet above sea level, which
precludes it from the effects of a seismic sea wave.
Seiches: No inland bodies of water, which would be subject
to seiching, are located in the vicinity of the site.
CONCLUSIONS
Because no faults are presently known to exist beneath the
site, the probability of ground surface rupture is considered
remote. It is concluded that the proposed site development is
feasible from the engineering geology point of view.
RPC /jm
(8) Action Engineering
Respectfully submitted,
BASELINE CONSULTANTS
/�
c and P. Cousxneau, CZG 32I
0
0
CITY Or
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING ElIVISION
1 U4-4r FfoL1.
-FAkif
%4,F�goam
LozxTj�q �)
NORTH
ITEM: r-
TITLE: Tu
EXHIBIT E- SCALE: d/,n
E
E
K]
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $14e•60
Ao•oo
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of.this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Ctudy. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three - determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Tract No. 10035 (Red Hill)
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: The Developers
c/o Meurer Engineering, Inc. (2 3) 373 -0S01
24202 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite $201, 'Lbrrance, CA 90505
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Meurer Engineering: Att'n:Burt Mazelow
24202 Hawthorne Blvd., Ste 2010 Torrance, CA 90505 (213 ) 373-0401
LOCATION OF
PROJECT
(STREET ADDRESS
AND ASSESSOR
PARCEL NO.)
Camino Predera
Extension
s/o Red Hill Country
Club Drive
Assessors Book
207, Page
101, Parcel 37 and
Book 207, Page
092, Parcel 1
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATF. AND
FEDMAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCK PERMITS:
All building permits, grading permit engineering Permits etc.
I -1
PROJECT.' DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT;
residences.
r
This project consists of the necessary
and utilities to create thirty nine (39)
E
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: The existing aXe a of this parcel
IS ±15.1 acres_ There are no existing structures on the site and the
proposed building site will be determined when Plans are prepared
DESCRIBE THE •ENVIROMMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, FLANTS (TREES),
ANIMLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (A. ^TACH NECESSARY SHEETS)s
The environmental setting of this project is vacant hillside, there is
no vegetation with the exception of weeds and brush. There is no cultural.
*or historical aspects to this site. The surrotndina nrannrrinc ��„� ;a
of single family residences to the north and east - cluster type- -
_residential development to the west and railroad right o° way tc the
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series -
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
S o pia nrr�ia + no oar of a larger project
1 � .
PROJECT.' DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT;
residences.
r
This project consists of the necessary
and utilities to create thirty nine (39)
E
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: The existing aXe a of this parcel
IS ±15.1 acres_ There are no existing structures on the site and the
proposed building site will be determined when Plans are prepared
DESCRIBE THE •ENVIROMMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, FLANTS (TREES),
ANIMLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (A. ^TACH NECESSARY SHEETS)s
The environmental setting of this project is vacant hillside, there is
no vegetation with the exception of weeds and brush. There is no cultural.
*or historical aspects to this site. The surrotndina nrannrrinc ��„� ;a
of single family residences to the north and east - cluster type- -
_residential development to the west and railroad right o° way tc the
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series -
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
S o pia nrr�ia + no oar of a larger project
C .
J
WILT. T1175 PROJrCT:
YES NO
x 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
_ x 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)!
x. 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
x 6. Create the need for use. or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best- of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
Date_ 8f2r�cgG SignatureC p
Title President
2 -3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTPUCTION
The follOVYinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No,:,�, nPyAlonar�
—� Tract No 30035
Specific Location of Project:
Camino Predara� F�'ersion e/o Red M11 Country Club Cz,
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
PHASE I PHASE 2
0
3. Date proposed to
begin construction: 6/81 or sooner
4- Earliest date of
occupancy: 6/82
Model
and I of Tentative
5, Bedrooms Price Ranae Not yet determined
PHASE 3 PILZSE 4 TOTAL
Wq
Q
a.
RESIDENTIAL CONSTPUCTION
The follOVYinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No,:,�, nPyAlonar�
—� Tract No 30035
Specific Location of Project:
Camino Predara� F�'ersion e/o Red M11 Country Club Cz,
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
PHASE I PHASE 2
0
3. Date proposed to
begin construction: 6/81 or sooner
4- Earliest date of
occupancy: 6/82
Model
and I of Tentative
5, Bedrooms Price Ranae Not yet determined
PHASE 3 PILZSE 4 TOTAL
Wq
Q
RESOLUTION NO_
A RESOLUTIbN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10035
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by The Developers, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision
of 15.7 acres of land in the. R-1-12 zone, located south and east of
Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207- 101 -37
and 207- 092 -10 into 30 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission
for public hearing and action on March 25, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has re
subject to all conditions set forth in the
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports
evidence presented at the public hearing.
:ommended approval of the Map
Engineering and Planning
has raad and considered the
and has considered other
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
0 SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10035 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;,
(c) The site is physically suitable for the -type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the t,--.a :ive tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
I
Resolution No.
Page 2
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. _
SECTION 'L: Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Prior to final map recordation, appropriate provisions
shall be made for the disposition and /or maintenance of
areas adjacent to the two existing single family residences
on Red Hill Country Club Drive which are not needed for
right -of -way purposes. Such provisions shall be approved
by the City Engineer and the City Planner.
2. If this tract is to be developed as a custom lot subdivision,
the precise design and placement of all structures on
lots 1 through 9 and 14 through 16 shall be subject to
approval by the Design Review Committee prior to the
issuance of Building Permits. Appropriate restrictions
to this effect shall be recorded alon4_ with the final
map.
3. The Building Official shall critically review the structural
integrity of each unit in this tract as it relates to
seismic safety. If, in the opinion of the Building
Official, additional structural elements are needed, then
they shall be so required.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
4. Prior to final map recordation, the precise alignment of
Camino Predera at Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be
revised to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
5. Installation of a stormdrain system from existing inlet
at Red Hill Country Club Drive to the existing inlet
structure at Cucamonga Creek Channel including dedication
of easements shall be required to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
6. All existing easements lying within the future right -of-
way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City
Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the
tract map.
Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any
existing utility facility that would affect construction.
0 .
Resolution No.
Page 3
B. Adequate provisions shall -be made for acceptance and
disposal of surface drainage entering the property
from adjacent areas.
9. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross
lot drainage where required shall be delineated or
noticed on the fianl map.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the-Planning Commission
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: CnMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
KI
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
Subject:
Applicant: zl1^.
Location: ate�:f1v CGS r r��c 1nG�- G�.rt>' <ae : �•�
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. Site Development
1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file
in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
` 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permi -ts.
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect -at
time of Building Permif issuance.
® _r/44. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation
Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards.
_ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and
located by th% developer subject to approval by the Planning Division.
_ 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with
view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be
subject to approval by the Planning Division.
_ 7. If - dwellings ::re to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill
Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the
Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division
for -- review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
9. All roof appurtenances, including air cond °tioners, shall "a architecturally
integrated, s' led from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties
and streets a:, uired by the Planning and Building Divisions.
V"'�10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.
_ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan
shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of
shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adiacent properties.
12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall
be solar heated. _
_ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open
spaces and recreational uses.
_ 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticais
kept out of public view from private and public streets.
_ 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first
unit.
_ 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a
clear and concise manner, including proper illumination.
17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be
installed on each unit in this project.
18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit.
_ 19. All units within this development shall be preFlumbed to be adapted
for a solar water ;seating unit.
_ 20. Energy conserving bolding materials and appliances are required to be
.incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited
to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double
paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc.
` 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a
solar water heating unit.
_ 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the
satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District.
_ 23. Local and Master Plannad Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout
the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma.
A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum s`opes,
physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City
equestrian trail standards, s hall be- submitted to and approved by the _
City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final maD.
_ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance
of equestrian trails. _
A
B.
25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or
rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing
criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall
be determined by. current market razes, rents and median income levels
at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision -
shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building
permits and occupancy of the units. _
. drking and Vehicular Access
i.
2.
_ 3.
5.
7
All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension
of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall.
Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size.
All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum or 24 feet wide.
Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum
of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with
Foothill Fire District requirements.
All parking spaces shall be double striped.
All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers.
Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked.
The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on
this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the
owner.
9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other
than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed
by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to
issuance of building per-nits.
C. Landscaping
_ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of
" existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be-
completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the
proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan.
KIII
i rc
3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be
trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees
shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division
during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those
trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced oi-a
tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division.
tl"0 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in
accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior
streets and 20' on exterior streets.
_ 5. A mini.num of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
shall be provided within the development; 20% -24" box or larger, 7046 -15
gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon.
_ 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
?l 7. All slope banks in access o` five (5) feet in vertical height shall and
are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with
slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope
planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and
appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shail
be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the
developer until each -individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.
Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes
shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in
satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all
such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading
or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Bu ?lding
Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to
germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination.
d 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained
by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance
of building permits.
9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall
be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans.
10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and
sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall
be'5ubject to approval by the Planning Division.
11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted
within the project.
12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman
size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along
I
D. $i ns
_ 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conform =e
with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, and shall require -review and approval
by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs.
_ 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall. be submitted to th;
Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of
Building permits.
_ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with thi
approval and will require separa.e sign review and approval.
E. Additional Approval: Required
_ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Bui ding
Permit.
2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map.
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval
of Zone Change and /or Variance Conditional Use Permit
4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(! ) dt
which time the Planning Commissi -tn may add or delete coFF tions or revoke
the Conditional Use Permit.
_ 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement b3
purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail cn
or adjacent to their property.
In purchasing the home locat >d on Lot Tract
on , ( have read the C-C. & R.'s and
understand t� paid' Lot — is subject to a mutual re-
ciprocal easement for the pu:,pose of allowing equestrian
traffic to gain access.
Signed
Furchaser
Said statement is to be filed by tie developer with the City prior tee
occupancy.
V6. Prior to approval and recordation cif the final map, or prior to issuance of
building permits, when no subdivis on map is involved, written certification
from all affected School Districts. shall be submitted to the DepartrrMt. of
Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or
will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. )Such
letter of certification must have been issued by the School District rithin
sixty (60) days prior to the final nap approval in the case of the subdivision
map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential proje!ts.
/7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance
of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the
affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or
will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to 'thedh
Cepartment of Community Development. Such letter must have been is;;ued by
the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in
the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects. For projects using septic talik facilities allowable
by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi-
fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be
obtained and submitted to the City.
- f�8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map
is nut approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is
involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project
unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission.
✓ 4. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section
of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordatior
of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT 'IHE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
F. Site Development
�1. The applicant shall comply with '.tie latest adopted Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing C %de, National Electric Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval
of this project.
V Z. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence
shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply
for fire protection is available.
V 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling
unit s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Foe, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee.
_ 4. PriAr to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial
development or addition t9. an existing development, the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan
Checking Fees.
5. This approval shall become null and void if ouilding permits are not issued
for this project within one year from the date of project approval.
1% 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official.
_ 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material
and non - combustible roof material.
_ 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the
street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding
or plan -ons where appropriate.
G. Existing Structures
_ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances
considering use, area and fire- resistivenelr of existing buildings.
_ 2. Existing buildings) shall be made to comply with current Building and
Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
_ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped
to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code.
H. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices.
The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the -
approved conceptual grading plan.
_Z2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensad by the
State of California to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist
and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
&%4- The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning, Engineering_and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior
to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit
whichever comes first..
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DTVTSION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
I. Dedications and Vehicular Access
I. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -ef -way
and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the
—' following streets:
additional feet on
additional feet on _
additional feet on
k13. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards.
4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as
follows:
5. Reciprocal easements shall be pro, ided ensuring access to all parcels over
private roads, drives, or parking areas.
6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal
circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the
property or in the operation of the proposed business.
J. Street Improvements
1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street
lights on all interior streets.
1/ 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited tc:
STREET NAME
CURB &
GUTTER
A.C.
PVMT.
SIDE-
WALK.
DRIVE
APPR.
STREET
LIGHTS
A.C.
OVERLAY
WHEEL
CHAIR RAMPS
OTHER .
1/ 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment
permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
t/ 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements,
prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _
_t,- S. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the Cit}- Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the pyblic-
improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever comes first.
V 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City
Engineer, prior to occupancy.
7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per the requirements of the City Engineer.
K. Drainage and Flood Control
1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage
facilities required by the City Engineer.
2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations:
_ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding
under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions
of the program and City Ordinance No. 24.
_ 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wail will be required to protect
the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street.
_ 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying
streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type
drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or
landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line.
L. Utilities -
1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground
including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. —
Y^ 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving
utility companies and the City Engineer.
p 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public
utilities, as required. -
4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in
accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards.
5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet
requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire
District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San
Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to
recordation.
6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other tnterest .d
agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any
requirements that may be received from them. _
M. General Reouirements and Approvals
1. Permits from other agencies will be
A. Caltrans for:
B. County Dust Abatement (requ
San Bernardino County Flood
_kD. Other:
required as follows:
ired prior to issuance of a grading permit)
Control District
L -S7-4g q pp -de^l iScc�+9r
;lc�
_ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles
of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of
the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to
the City. ,
V 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs
involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer.
1/ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
®_
—
E
i
®1
CITY OF RANG iO U_ C'.AMONGA
STAFF REPOBX
DATE: March 25, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 6761 - Carneli
A residential Subd1V75ion of id./ acres int0 z parcels in the I
zone located on the southwest corner of Highland and Carnelian
The above- referenced parcel map was inadvertently placed on the Planning
Commission agenda. It will be rescheduled and readvertised at a later date.
Respectfully submitted,
:BY.:jaa
ITEM C
QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF SPORT
i
DATE: March 25, 1981
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 6725 - Daon Corp*
A ten 10 parcel comnerc a in ustrial.subd vision o
176.85 acres located on the northwest corner of Haven and
Arrow
E d:•j0
60
mom=
The circulation plan as shown on above referenced Parcel Map does not
conform with the previously discussed circulation plan. It is recommend-
ed that the public hearing be continued to April 8, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
C3.J
: BK: j as
ITEM H
f..
LZ
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CL) AMaN)GA
S AFF PORT
March 25, 1981
Planning Commission
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
- Davis Devel
An industrial subdivision of 4.39 acres of land into 8 parcels
within the M -R zone located on the north side of 7th Street, east
side of Hellman
INTRODUCTION: The applicant is requesting the division of 4.39 acres of
land into 8 parcels as shown on the tentative map. There is no proposal
for immediate development of the parcels. A conceptual site plan showing
possible development of the sites is attached for your review.
The existing properties to the north and east in the M -R zone are presently
vacant; to the west industrial buildings exist;and to the south is an exist-
ing residential tract.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is
Part I of the initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed
Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted
a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and
field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the envi-
ronment as a result of the proposed subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject
to the i�ty Engineer's Report, and that a negative declaration be issued. A
resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur.
ly sjpbmitted,
LBH: BK: j as
Attachments
ITEM I
RESOLUTION NO.
A-RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6724 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6724)
LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AND
7TH STREET.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6724, submitted by
Davis Development and consisting of 8 parcels, located on the east
side of Hellman, north side of 7th Street, being a division of a
portion of south 1/2 of lot 7, section 15, township 1 south, Range 7
west as recorded in Book 4, page 9; and,
WHEREAS, on February 9, 1981, a formal application was submitted
requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and
WHEREAS, on March 25, 1981, the Planning Commission held a
duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
® 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed
General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed
subdivision is consistent with the proposed
General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for
the proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements
will not cause substantial environmental
damage, public health problems..or have
adverse affects on abutting property.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant
adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on
March 25, 1981.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6724 is approved
subject to the conditions of the City Erjineer's Report pertaining
thereto.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
�. J
I]
11
Resolution No.
Page 2
BY:
Richard D , Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I. JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981, by the following vote -
to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
FILED BY: Davis Development TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6724
LOCATION: NEC Hellman and 7th Street DATE FILED: 2/9/81
NUMBER OF LOTS: 8
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of South 112 of lot 7, RECEIPT NUMBER:
Section 15 T.I.S. Range 7, West FEE: $250.00
LONE:
TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Williamson & Schmid GROSS ACREAGE: 5.44
ADDRESS:_ 17782 Skv Park Blvd. MINIMUM LOT AREA:
Irvine CA 92714 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:
RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE #
Joseph and Anna Comaroto 671 S. Aldenville Ave.
Covina, CA 91723
REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Dedications
_ 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary
easements as shown on the tentative map.
X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on ihe following
—` streets:
44 8400(4bX0 feet on 7th Street
_ 11 additional feet on Hellman
additional feet on
24 Corner P/L radius required on Hellman and 7th Street
Other
X 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be invited as fol ows: per Planning Commission
Resolution 78 -29.
4. Street vacation required for:
5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for:
6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows:
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6724 Page 3
^_ 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
A. Caltrans, fog:
B. City:
C. County Dust Abatement District: County of San ernar ino
D. J.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep:
E. Cucamonga County Water District:
F. Other:
Map Control
_ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro-
vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets.
23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either 'frontage, depth or area
and should be corrected on the final map:
_ 24. all corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of-way line in accord-
ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards.
` 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent
the creation of an unrecognized parcel located
_ 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows:
27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or
title explanation required.
Parcel Map Waiver is
28. Information submitted at the time of application is ! is not sufficient
to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to
requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances.
Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to E3 Recording for )
El Building permit for )
X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood-
ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be
subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24 zone AO and
Zone B.
_ 30. A drainage channel anal /or flood protection wail along the entire north pro-
perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets.
Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts.
_ 31. 3f water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the
back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns.
_ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_
33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will a required to assess impact o increased
runoff.
X 34. Erosion protection measures shall be provided for the parkway area at the
southeast corner of 7th Street and Hellman Avenue to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
Ff; >; RCE 20
E
E
C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA
INITIAL STUDY
C
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Envi-ron- mental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: = 6794
APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT:
Williaumn and Sc rAd, 17782 Sky
b
PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CA 92714(714)549 -2222
llav1S JJE-V i.0E7IIMT-5, L4UV rul:a wi .tea.. La- I Vc" ..�..t ....... ...... ----
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
No street address - Northeast corner of Seventh St. & Hellman Avernze. _
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
=I %—
I -1
80267
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Paroel Mako No.
p=pgsing to creme eight (8) M zoned parcels from one (1) 6.02 acre
Parcel
El
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPCSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Parcel size gross -6.02 acres.
DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMIENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORVATION ON TOPOG??,PHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
west crene a.l industrial - --
is the project, part of a larger prefect, one of a series -
o£ cumulative actions, which al-though individually small,
may as a whole have significan= environmental impact?
No. _
g2
KI
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. C:eate a substantial change in ;round
c intours?
X 2. C.-eate a substantial change in existing
n )i.se or vibraticn?
_ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
r unicipal services (police, fii-e, -water,
menage, etc_)?
X 4. e,reate changes in the existing zoning or
reneral plan designations?
X 5: temove any existing trees? Ho v many?
X E. ^,reate the need for use or dir?osal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables o: explosives?
Explanation of my yr'S answers above:
N/A
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the consi ruction of
residential units, complete the :Drm on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the st tements furnishes
above and in the attached exhibits present t' a data and
information required for this initial evalua ion to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, stat iments, and
information presented are true and correct t IIthe best of
my knowledge and belief. I iurther understaid that
additional information may be re•?uired to be submitted
before an adequate eva-ilation car. be made by the Development
Review Committee. '
Date 2-5 -81 Signature Tour_
Bober
Title )1 W l '
70-13
d . @ers
.•
ig
—T �— •... I gp. , k a
� J 1t 1 I I .� r e• i •+
1 I•F
s
d' J i
N
x
m
O � �
�Q2 p
my
3z 4
�
WOLL Vm
Z 35 ° W
z� 9,
F_.
� <Y O t7 e
�u<
Z�Op o
w
F— s
6 9�1■ gr � c
•^^ iZ M _J
Um yap
W a O
m
®.? a m
a
r
1 i
lil .
JY
q vY
�
C
ir
J y
-4
nk
d"
-
°i
�
s
_
a
t
I Eat��a$
�I7q _ m %NNR•OeeFY
notAT J OEAZF�p
LS
E v
203 zi
5. =� zee
d r ..,,,i � ♦ o Nu � IU ,, 2
3v' d�Ioa4. y�sS
Tr-
Qr
r_ L-
u
0
u
1
11
�'�Y •�Y� • MY� \t Y
LNI • '^J0195tl 9 8L731 j64=UV ML'
^ 'Q
o: �•/O �'� 4 h L
• f3 •!Nl1� • ♦.Q .a mn L. � 1 �• �
LEJ
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
I SUBJECT:
L]
0
ABSTRACT:
process fo
Commission
CITY OF R.P.MiD CUC'.AMONGA
OFF REPORT
March 25, 1981
Members of the Planning Commission
Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
Michael 'Vairin, Senior Planner
- COCA
CO�IROTTLNG COMPANY - The development of a Pb,Suu square
foot bottled beverage distribution and warehouse facility on
9.2 of land in the M -2 zone, located on the north side of 6th
Street, east of Haven Avenue.
The applicants have completed the Development and 0� -sign Review
r the above - described project and it is now before the Planning
for their review and consideration. Recommended Conditions of
Approval are
attached for consideration.
BACKGROUND: The applicants, Coca Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, are
requesting approval for the development of a warehouse and office facility
totaling 26,800 square feet In building area. The project site is located
on the north side of 5th Street, east of Haven Avenue, and will be the first
project in that immzdiate vicinity. presently, 6th Street is only a small
dirt road which provides access to the existing on -site vineyards. The
facility is proposed •_e be used as :warehousing facility only, with no
manufacturing occurirg on the site. The operations include warehousing,
loading and pickup for distribution of products. The site is presently
zoned M -2 and the General Plan indicates the area as Industrial Park.
ANALYSIS: The site development plan, Exhibit "B ", has been developed in
accordance with Zoning Ordinance requirements and standards. Building set-
backs, parking areas, and landscaped areas are all being provided in accor-
dance with standards and policies set by the Planning Commission. 6th Street
is a Special Boulevard as designated on the General Plan and it is being
proposed to be landscaped as such.
Since this is the first development in the area, this project will require
the necessary imo:nuements to 6th Street from Haven east of the new north/
south streE* proposed by this development. The street pattern was previously
established by a parcel map for this area which was approved by the Planning
Commission several months ago. Access to the project will be provided by one
driveway from 6th Street and onefrom the new inter4or north /south street.
ITEM J
z
IT
w
CITY OP
® ]RANCHO CUCAM
PLANNING DIVISION
h.
Planning Commission
March 25, 1981
Page 2
The Design Review Committee has met with the applicant and architects to discuss
the design of the facility. The proposed designs are indicated on the attached
exhibits which show the elevations of the structures. Colored renderings will
be available at the meeting for your review. The project is proposed to be con-
structed of metal walls, panels, and a metal parapet roof. The Design Review
Committee had concerns relative to the use of an all metal building in the
Industrial Park area. The Committee's final recommendation was that the design
of the structure would be mcre successful if the parapet roof and the side walls
were different colors in order to provide more contrast and differentiation in
the roof and walls. Staff also shared the same concerns, however, feels that
more than a color change is needed to accomplish and appropriate design for a
building in the Industrial Park category. The Industrial Park category is an-
ticipated to contain high design quality projects which would include quality
landscape, and architectural treatments. It is Staff's opinion that additional
changes are necessary to create the desirable architectural feeling which has
been discussed for the Industrial Park category. The building walls of the
office building could incorporate other buiidiut: materials and yet retain the
basic purpose of the metal building concept. Therefore, in addition to the
Design Review Committee's recommendation that a color change be made between
the roof and building walls, Staff further recomm--nds that additional materials
be incorporated into the building wars which would further enhance the design
and aesthetics of the building.
Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and attached
for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field
investigation and has found no significant adverse impacts upon the environment
as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of a Negative Declaration
would be in order.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and con-
sider the various aspects of this project. If the Commission concurs with the
findings and analysis of Staff, then appropriate Conditions of Approval are
attached for your review and consideration.
!d,
Attachments: Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Part I
h�. Resolut-
"A" - Location Map
"B" - Site Plan
"C" - Illustrative Plan
"D" - Building Elevations
"E" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Initial Study
ion of Approval with Conditions
I]
11
w1 a.Due unwa goucig 9ouownno opueb
o.uu„�OU. I.,nl >ml. su. .mu.nuo° Il i 3 nga6uy sol 10 �cucou LV v 3 13wil)og elon -noon -
uwva muou .•n uv.rualnu e,n.o Sul M W >���
I4V F
7.g
i
ak *3r
r r
opV sM
L 11
0
IRK
li
AS
1
L
1
uu
S
��.
Yj
I.�
jI
L 11
0
IRK
li
AS
1
L
1
uu
S
Yj
I.�
jI
L 11
0
IRK
li
0,2WOn
ssl*Wv on to
aL
S� w
7 a r,,♦
m
di
Csr
aL
S� w
7 a r,,♦
m
di
ac.cve o:u pn : :e a.unr w: -" "' ^ • ,., •.•••` •• — :Pua0 z wowwm* oyoueu
Oairl�i� Cu• I�rnlawll, pui��rnp >xWiuii� �AIO�.IM> /.Nw1Yw M I�MY/%M 4
......p p.n�vu V.. .a.rva.nv o...e CJ W!I�ILI•YG� 7 QUO'' tMOBut• fo'1 /G l4t•eLLID3 BWAGS Blp'.i- �•'��J
I
1
[N
Y
1
I
f
9
.I
�eS
�O
I
Sob
d),
Z
•
�x
1 4 a -- `
Yw9-
u W ey
8 iCUOon� ogu
Y
�^ \
0.11 ... ICY\ hl{\ �pp \�1
ptl M.n j. ;�
Iw.u:U
I r•e.d � W aolpN7iu O7 pi �
LilOuy d7 ,O JWLCWO) OuapDe LlOo-QO7
LJ
41�
Jqa i $
1
i
, Jilt
. 1 '
a
Ell
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
r
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $ 90.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis ataff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, Z) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE:
f Ac6tCtics CucAi -�A i5�ructa
CocA-Co,^ e= u L& Co • o F I os ems
A7PLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS,
S-
NAME, ADDRESS, Y'ELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: — IAcUt-
IrOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AW
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: _ .
1
f•
PROJECT 1ESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Samoa
El.--7
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: p��s
L]^ �..��
DESCRIBE THE ENVIROUMENT-AL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SI'D'E
INCLUDING INFORMATION vN TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROU -MING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
�=4]F= 'Jt4P� / �%� o g �OCT�}}•
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series-
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
gray as a whole have significant environmental impact?
Flo
1-2.
kI
El
WILL THIS PROSECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
2, Create a substantial change i:i existing
noise or vibration!
_ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)!
_ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
Ac 5: Remove any existing trees! How many?
_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statenuonts furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Deveinpment
Review commi tee.
Date �/7 /. Signat
Title
2 -3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -01
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, EAST
OF HAVEN AVENUE, IN THE M -2 ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1981, a complete application
was filed by Coca Cola 3ottling Company for review of the above - described
project; and
WHEr?FAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the Gbjectives of
the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in
which the use is proposed; and,
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity; and,
3. That the proposed use is in compliance wit', each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and
4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General
Plan.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse
impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on
March 25th, 1981.
SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 81 -01 is approved
subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. The final exterior materials and colors of the office
and warehouse structure shall be reviewed and approved
by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of
Building Permits.
F9
L.-A
Resolution No.
Page 2
ENGINEERING DIVISION:
2. Recordaticn "of tentative parcel map no. 6544 shall be A
required prior to issuance of building permit.
3. Applicable portions of the conditions of approval
for Parcel Map 6544 shall also apply to this project
as determined the the City Engineer.
4. Letter of acceptance from downstream property owners
shall be required where runoff from 6th Streetfiows
onto private propE•rties to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
5. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.
Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City standards.
6. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and
disposal of surface drainage entering the property
from adjacent areas.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT- COMMISSIONERS:
0
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEnT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
Subject :_V��
Applicant:_CCCA CO 1A
Location
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT. THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. Site Development
1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on fide
in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
2. Revised site plans and building elevations in --orporating all conditions of
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Eivision prior to issuance of
building permits.
3. Approval of this request shall. not waive comeliance with all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
time of Building Permit issuance.
4. The developer shall provide all lots with adecuate sideyard area for Recreation
Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards.
_ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be instalied and
located by the developer subject to approval LV the Planning Division.
6. Trash receptac%. areas shall be enclosed by a i foot high masonry wall with
view obstructing gates pursuant to City standa•ds. Location shall be
subject to approval by the Planning Division.
_ 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area (esignated by the Foothill
Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materiels must be approved by the
Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
8:- A sample of the roof material shall be submittei to the Planning Division
for review and approval prior to issuance of bullding pensits.
9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditionors, shall be architecturally
integrated, shielded from view and the sound bu Tered from adjacent properties.
and streets as required by the Planning and Buiidin; Divisions.
�10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approvai contained herein shall be completed to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.
1110
11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuanc, cf building permits. Such-plan
shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method oT
shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties.
12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall
be solar heated. — -
13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open
spaces and recreational u:as.
14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals
kept out of public view from private and public streets.
15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner and Building Offi =ial prior to occt,pancy of the first
unit.
_ 16. Ali buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a
clear and concise manner, including proper illumination.
17. Sulid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be
installed on each unit in this project.
18. Security dev'„es such as W'in,'ow locks shall be installed on each unit.
_ 19. All units within this dev=iopment shall be preplumbed to be adapted
for a solar water heating unit.
20. Energy conservinq uiai.li nn r�teeiais and appliances are required to be
incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited
to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double
paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc.
21. This development shall provide ar. option to home buyers to F:;:shase a
solar rater heating unit.
22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the
satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District.
2s. Lccai and Master Planned Erues:.ria.i Trails shall be provided throughout:
the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma.
A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating- widths, maximum slop =s,
physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with city
equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map.
24. This tract shall form or-annex to a maintenance district for maintenance
of equestrian trails.
25. This project.shall provide percent of a.-fordable housing- and /or
rents, in-confcrmance with General Plan housing policies and the housing
criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall
be determined by current market rates, rents and median income,levels
at tfie time of construction of.the project. Proof of this provision
shall be submitted to the Planning -Division prior to finalizing building
permits and occupancy of the units. — -
B. - Parking and Vehicular Access
1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension
of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall.
_of 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size.
3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide.
4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintt: nce free and clear, a minimum
of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with
Foothill Fire District requirements.
5. All parking spaces shall be double striped.
_ 6. All units shall be Drovided with automatic garage door openers.
_ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked.
8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on
this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the
owner.
_ g. No parking shall be permitced within the interior cirulation aisle other
than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed
by the applicant and submitted to the City planning Division prior to
issuance of building permits.
C. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Existing shall be retained wherever possible- A master plan of
existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be
completed by the developer. Saia plan shall take into account the
proposed 5radiny and shall be required to-be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to approval of i'•e final grading plan.
.•.
_ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall he
trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees
shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Diviaion
during the review of the Master P14a of Existing On -Site Trees. Those
trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a
tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division.
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in
accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior
streets and 20' on exterior streets.
_ 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
_hail be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15
gallon, and 10 % -S gallon.
—0/-6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
7. All slope barks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and
are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with
slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope
planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and
appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irri�".lticn shall
be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the
developer un:.l each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.
Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes
shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in
satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all
such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading
or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building
Official. Irrigatiun on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to
germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination.
_-8- All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained
by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance
of building permits.
9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall
be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted mans.
_ 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways,.walls, landscaping and
sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall
be subject to approval by the Planning Division.
V. A minimum of aZ * s specimen size trees shall be pial.ted
within the project.
12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman
size5.re and an abundance of landscaping is required along
11
D. Signs
_z1 - Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conforrsnce
with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance anw shall require review and approval
by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs.
_ 2. A uniform sign program for this development- shall be submitted to the
Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of
Building permits.
` 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this
approval and will require separate sign review and approval.
E. Additional Approvals Reouired
1.
Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit.
_ 2.
Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map.
3.
Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval
of Zone Change and /or Varia a %Conditional Use Permit
4.
This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month' ;) at
-
which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or- revoke
the Conditional Esc Permit.
The developer is ;•equired to obtain the following signed statement by
purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on
or adjacent to their property.
In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract
,
on I have read the C.C. & R-'s and
understand t at said Lot is subject to a mutual re-
ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian
traffic to-gain access.
Signed
Purchaser
Said statement is to be filed by the developer with tFc City prior to
occupancy.
_ 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of
building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification
from all affected School - Districts, shall -be submitted to the Department of
Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or
will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such
letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within
sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision
map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
petl }�i�a•,
F.
7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or F.ior td the issuance
of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the
affected water district, ,hat adequate sewer and water facilities -are or
will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the go
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by
the water district within sixty (60•) days prior to final 'map approval 'in
the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable
by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi-
fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be
obtained and submitted to the City.
8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map
is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is
involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project
unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission.
9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section
of the Growtl Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation
of the map iF the subdivision is -going to be developed as tract homes.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
Site Development
1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordi,.ances in effect at the time of approval
of this project-
vole
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible constrI.Iction, evidence
shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply
for fire protection is available.
3.
J4 4.
5.
.1 6.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling
uni''s) or major additign to an existing urlt(s), the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial
development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay
development fees at the estz�,lished rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit ant' Plan
Checking Fees. - This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not Issued
for th.a project within one year from the date of project approval.
Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official.
7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material
and non - combustible roof material.
8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the
street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding
or plan -ons where appropriate. -
G. Existing-Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances
considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and
Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, f%lled and/or capped
to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code.
H. Gradin
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices.
The final grading plan shalt be is substantial conformance with the
approved conceptual grading plan.
�. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the
State of California. i:o perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or, geologist
and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
4_ The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior
to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit
whichever comes. first.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS: '-
I. Dedications and Vehicular Access
1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street riqhts -of -way
and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the
following street::
I-VIA 30) additional feet on (0 <;ireet
® _ aaditional feet on
additional feet on
3.
✓3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards.
4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall -be dedicated as
follows:
5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over
private roads, drives, or parking areas.
✓6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal
circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods Lo the
property or in the operation of the proposed business.
Street Improvements
1. Construct full street improveu;F!nts including, but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway tries and street
lights on all interior streets.
2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to:
STREET NAME
CURB &
GUTTER
A.C.
PVMT.
!
SIDE-
WALK
DRIVE
APPR.
STREET
LIGHTS
A.!;.
OVERLAY
WHEEL
CHAIR RAMPS
OTHER
✓
✓
✓
r/
�/
W4
u
V-
✓
✓
^ _
I�
w- #4 3wpp "cA "m P v.u.w,q ww v iv a1. rvmwM iaswlcapW5 ano lvrt jow 4 .
1 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment
permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
4. Street improvement plans apprived by the City Engineer and prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements,
prior to issuance of an 2ncroachmr-t permit.
✓ 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed tn the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the City Attorney, guarantee - *iig cowpletion of the public
improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever comes first. _
✓ 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, prior to occupancy.
7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic aftd street name signing shall
Per the requirements of the City Engineer.
be installed
9
K. Drainage and Flood Control
✓1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage
facilities required by the City Engineer. -
_ 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations:
__I,/3. - The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding
under the National Flood Insure.nc= Program and is subject to the provisions
'of the program and City Ordinance No. 24.
_ 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect
the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street.
_ 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying
streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type
drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or
landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line.
L. - Utilities
✓/ 1.
2.
3.
✓ 4.
All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed undergroind
including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV.
Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving
utility companies and the City Engineer.
Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public
utilities, as required.
Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in
accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards.
✓ 5. Water and sewer systcr. plans shall be designed and constructed to meet
requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire
District and the Enviro:imental Health Department of the County of San
Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to
recordation.
_✓6:- Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and o. er interested
agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be F,lbject to any
requirements that may be received from them.
M. General Requirements and Approvals
Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
A. Caltrans for:
_-.1o'B. County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit:)
C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District
D. Other:
2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Articles
of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of
the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to
the pity.
✓ 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Ihtention to form Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Council. ` The engineering costs
involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer.
_ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
e-
L11
CITY OF RAI\U10 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 25, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hcgan, City Planner
SUBJECT: FOOTJILL 80111_FVARn cnRRTnnR
ABSTRACT: As the Planning Commission will recall during the con-
sideration of the General Plan along Foothill Boulevard, there was much
concern expressed over the variety of land uses, existing and proposed.
Therefore, the Planning Commission found it necessary to establish a
Foothill Corridor Study zone. Staff in('icated that the study would not
hamper any development progress along the Boulevard and that we would
bring forward to the Planning Commission, prior to development consider-
ation, any issues that might arise or could arise from a proposed develop-
ment. This is one issue.
DISCUSSION: The property in question is the Perry's Market site and
the vacant land surrounding it. There is an application that will be
coming before the Planning Commission for a Parcel Map and development
of two of the parcels within the lot s -lit. In close examination of
the area, we found that there are many problems that the Commission
should be aware of before approval is given for a lot split of develop-
ment on the property. Three exhibits have been prepared for your infor-
mation. Exhibit 1 shows the existing zoning and land use cross - hatched
on the mar as the Perry's Market: the Dry Cleaners, the Drug Store and
Pet Store, and the Standard Gas Station. Also listed on the map are the
-carious uses of the property. As you can see from Exhibit 1, there is
a real hodgepodge of uses.
Exhibit 2 indicates the four parcels which the Parcel Map ,jroposes in
its division. 'he remaining property appears to be already subdivided.
However, in checking the records there is no Title Report that has been
filed with the Parcel ;�ao. it has sinco been requested. Our initial
feeling is that the 1,)t split which has occurred on the Perry's Market
site may not be a legal lot split, and in fact, there may be only one
piece of property encompassing the Perry's Market site and the remaining
vacant property.
The question that arises is that with the property zoned C -2 (Generaly
Business Commercial) is it appropriate to develop all Commercial or is
there some alternative that would be better planning? We think there is.
ITEM K
NEC Foothill & Helms -2- February 25, 1981
He believe that consideration should be given to a residential use on
Lot 4 and everything north of Lot 4 would be commercial. Exhibit 3
shows how a suggested residential tract of 4 units per acre might
develop un Parcel 4. Higher density could be utilized also on this
property.
The Commission should be very careful in discussing what land uses are
or are not appropriate for this particular property since any discussion
that :night appear to have the effect of a decision on land use outside
of a specific Ganeral Plan request would be pre- judging a public hearing
item. However, we believe that the Commission can give a strong indication
as to their desires for development of the property in question. Specific-
ally, does it appear that Lot 4 is good commercial property, or would it
be better residential property. If the Commission concurs that Lot 4
would be better residential and poor commercial property, then that
indication can be given through discussion a•! a min_ *_c — action by the
Planning Commission relative to this Staff Report. If the Commission
feels ot:oerwise for the development of Lot 4, then indication should be
given as to what would be an appropriate development of that property.
Respectfully submitted,
ty i
H: co
Attachments: Exhibit "1"
Exhibit "2"
Exhibit "3"
- Existing Zoning and Land Use
- Proposed Lot Split
- Suggested Land Use
El
11
E
E,
f
' r�., y.. l•-. ar:...... r. wl... : r...-... .�:w::::;!.a.,a�.y�.�..._5.1.�_ .- -._ -- ,_ ..'J' ,. '^
STAN co a /o.Qto 1 .•s� . .
V'rtt.,o; � a ,. f/AG"r`f.'' ... ` i/hAexr • i4Rk,yEj � f , W � MQ.�tT �•e e
.B�jAC S7AT.av S two .•�
�. ua o0
It /ro icy
44 • 1 � 2 R I � hnl .� � � i
g ' 4;4!..71!: M11. ros ss �'es �. .R.l OC ilk
t j : UA17 q .v6useE .
W / . All. jf•v R• -/ R -/
J ZA"o d/
•L
�. ` '` •`.
e ?s HsLnIoS.S>iR�
W; .Al
2.�►M. h
) 1f34'i 2
E
GO
m
na
A
4
•L
�. ` '` •`.
e ?s HsLnIoS.S>iR�
W; .Al
2.�►M. h
) 1f34'i 2
E
,y.
�'�, ^�'1. 1]
.;u .
��''
., .�r.
��
,: r'
.,.
1•
. er.:.
,f
1.,
ri
�. -��.,
",,',,
:��
��. �,
,:
�;f,
f
I
it.
I
.ri
1,
',�. ',,}
.;; s
''':��
i�
O
Ij 11..11
.�
�� � �`
a. .t. � V i 1 "�1
�.:
a..
j.
Planning Commission ftsting of r/5
RANCHO CILAMONGA PLANNING
�--IIMMISSION S--GN-LIP SHEET
Please print your nave, critg, and indIcate thc, item
yon Wish to SpeaA on. Yru.
214ME f .DDRESS
Tv TCM
4-1)
2.
L
5.
6.
zef� ,,�7.kcebip 7o
7.
8
0 dF
9. -7
12.
16,
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
.25.
2 6.
27,
28.
29.
30.