HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/04/08 - Agenda Packetly,
y; .
I
II.
III.
IV
V.
CI"PY OF
RANUD CUCAMONrA
PLANNIINU COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY APRIL 8, 1981 7:00 P.M.
LION`S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Commissioner Dahl
Commissioner King
Commissioner Sceranka
Appcoval.of Minutes
Commissioner Rempel
Commissioner Tolstoy
December 18, 1981
January 26, 1981
February 2, 1981 /
Announcements
Consent Calendar - L
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERT T N0. 81 -01 - A change in the
color scheme for the previously approved K -Mart
Department store to be located on the northeast
corner of Arrow and Haven.
Public Hearing
The I following items are public hearings in which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address
the Commission from the public microphone by giving your
name and address. A21 such opinions shall be limited to
5 minutes per individual for each, project.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
� -03 - WATKINS - The evelopment of a commercial shop-
ping center within the C -2 zone on 4.83 acres located
on the northeast 'corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill
oulevard - APN 1077 - 641 -54 through 67
r
Planning Commission Agenda
-2- April 8, 1981
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6726 -
(j;X JCQ WATKINS - A subdivision of 5.09 acres into 8 parcels
wwithinl the C -2 zone located at the northeast corner
of Archibald and Foothill - APN 1077- 641 -54 through 67
VII. Old Business
VIlI New Business -
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -06
1� FRANCIS - The Uevelopment of a 15,600 sq. ft., 2 -story
V� professional office building on a 1.39 acre parcel in
the C -2 zone located on the south side of Foothill Blvd.
a San Bernardino Road - APN „207- 191 -50
E. SOLUTION ON SIDEWALKS
IX. ouncil Referrals
X.(�- ,pirector's Reports
F. UQUESI FOR WAIVER OF A CONDITIONAL_ USE PERMIT for the
nsta!lation of a temporary trailer for residential sales
on Tract No. 10491 located on the southwest corner of
Victoria and Ramona Avenue.
e�
G. CABLE T.V.
XI.
VV
Public Comments
This Is the time and place for the general public to address
the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which
do not already appear on this agenda.
XII.
Upcoming Agenda
XIII.
Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournm:•nt time. !f items go beyond
that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the
Commission.
�nr `
p
�;
i�
0
U
J
U
r
- - -- - .
El
CALL TO ORDER
CITY OF RANCHO CUAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
December 18, 1980
E
Chairman Richard Dahl called the Adjourae& Regular Meeting of the
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:15 p.m. The meeting
was held at the Lion's Park. Community Center., 9161 Base Line Road,
Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman Dahl then led in the pledge to the flag.
ROLL CALL
Present: Richard Dahl, Jeffrey King, Herman Rempel,
Jeff Sceranka, Peter Tolstoy
Absent: None
Staff Present: Barry Hogan, City Planner; Edward A. Hopson, City Attorney;
Jack Lam, Director of Community Development;
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engiteer; Joan Kruse, Secretary
ANNGUNCEMENTS
Mr. Lam, Director of Community Pevelopment, advised that the final Planning
Commission hearing schedule with listed topics was available.
Mr. Lam presented to the Commission consideratic-as of land use recommendations
in the Alta Loma area. There were several requests for changes:
1. 84 acres on the north side of Almond Street at the termination
of Beryl Street (The Roberts Group, lsc.). Existing Interim
General Plan designation: Hillside and : --ry low residential.
2. 97 acres on Hermosa Avenue, bordering the City limits. Existing
Interim General Plan designation: Very low residential.
3. 100 acres on the four corners of Hermosa and Hillside.
Existing Interim General Plan designation: Very low residential.
4. South of Wilson, west of Haven, east of Hermosa." Existing
Interim General Plan Designation: Very low residential and
medium residential.
5. East of Chaffey College, south of the extension of Wilson
Avenue, north of the extension of Banyan Avenue. Existing
5 -14 dwelling units per acre.
6. Kittie- corner and south of Chaffey College approximately 50
acres of land south of the extension of Banyan Avenue, 1000
y
feet north of Highland Avenue. Existing medium residential -
''
h
5 -15 dwelling units per acre.
cr,i
7. 1.6 acres located southwest of the intersection of Lemon
Avenue and Haven Avenue, south of the proposed Chaffey Plaza
Center. Existing General Plan designation: Medium residential,
5 -15 dwelling units per. acre.
8. 10 acres at the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and Haven
Avenue (Dan Evans, T & S Development Company). Existing Interim
General Plan designation: Low residential, 2 -5 dwelling units
per acre.
9. South of the extension of 19th Street adjacent to the Deer Creek
Flood Control Channel, Existing Irterim General Plan designation:
Alternatives A & C in low 2 -5 dwelling units per acre. Alternative
B indicates high residential :15 -30 dwelling units per acre.
10. Northeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue.
Existing Interim General Plan designation: Mixed Use.
11. Approximately 1000 feet north of Base Line Road on the west
side of Archibald Avenue. Existing Interim General Plan
designation: Mixed Use.
Mr. Lam stated that at the last General Plan meeting the Planning Commission
adopted a resolution addressing animals in a policy guideline that would
be incorporated within the General Plan. Mr. Lam also stated that staff
has been working with the Alta Loma Riding Club and was recommending t:lat
substansive portions of the equestrian trail plan which was provided by
the Alta Loma Riding Club be incorporated into the General Plan.
Mr_ Lam explained that one of the recommendations that an Equestrian
Committee be formed had already been acknowledged at the last_ Planning
Commission meeting. This Equestrian Committee would serve as a liaison
with staff to review future tracts coming before the City to look at
the trails systems that were being proposed.
Mr. Lam asked that the Planning Commission direct staff with regard to
any other recommendations.
Chairman Dahl asked.the Planning Commission if they wished to provide
direction to staff at this time or first go on with the public hearing
portion.
It was the consensus of the Commission that the public hearings proceed
first.
Mr. Stan Sievers, 6481 Orangethorpe Avenue, Buena Park, indicated that
he owned 84 acres that were known to the City as the Roberts Group. He
stated that he would like to sae the property zoned as is and that the
Edison Power lines be the natural cut off. He further indicated that the
General Plan has put a blight on property and they would like to have
resolution of the problems created by the General Plan.
Ms. Tony Quezada, representing the Roberts Group, 6210 Wilshire Boulevard,
Los Angeles, requested the deletion of hillside density and an increase
to 2 -3 units to the acre.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- December 18, 1981
Mr. Chuck Schneider, 9152 Hidden Farm Road, stated that he thought
what Mr. Young said was good and that his business acumen is needed.
However, he felt, that the people of Rancho Cucamonga could get the best
of two worlds. He hoped that the people would get together and get the
General Plan through and not have the State or Federal Government taking
over local control. He further stated that it was better to plan at
the local level. Mr. Schneider asked questions about inclusionary
zoning, density bonuses, and trade -offs relative to the Roberts Group
proposal. He stated that he did not want to see any trade -offs of any
kind in that area. Mr. Schneider also spoke of the activity node on
the west side of Haven and felt that it should not be allowed.
Mary Barlow, representative in the Alta Loma CAC, stated that she wished
to read a letter from the Citizens Advisory Commission relative to
densities. Mrs. Barlow expressed 12 points within the letter summarizing
that industrial development should not dictate the residential areas.
Mr. Vic Cherbak, 9020 Cinch Ring Lane, indicated that open space, horse
trails should be maintained. He also suggested that horses be registered
and that a fee be paid to keep the areas free of flies. He indicated that
he has 300 acres and keepshorses in an area designated as open space and
felt that animals should not be kept in areas that are compatible with
that designation.
Mr. David Barker, 950' Citation Court, expressed concern with the effect
of trade -offs, density bonuses, inclusionary zoning, etc. as they deal
with actual housing. He cited a need for communication so that there
would be an understanding of what is proposed.
There being no further comments, this portion of the public hearing was
closed.
Chairman Dahl stated that from what he had heard both for and against
regarding the R -1- 20,000, very low density, and the area near Chaffey,
the Planning Commission must come up with a viable answer. He further
stated that if there were no further comments, staff had prepared a
resolution that would be discussed.
Commissioner King stated that he would abstain from any recommendations
and discussion on the Roberts Group proposal as previously stated because
of a possible conflict of interest.
Commissioner Tolstcy stated that he wished to see the statement that was
contained in the Interim General Plan on page 19 included in this General
Plan relative to Chaffey College land use.
Mr. Lam stated that this statement would be appropriate on pages 186 -187
of the General Plan text.
Commissioner S.eranka stated that he would like to see a part of the
Resolution for the Roberts Group amended to clarify the second to the
last sentence that the area remain In Hillside Rc:aidential and very low
density. He requested that this be changed to state that the area remain
in very low density.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 18, 1981
Mr. Roy Schau,)en, 11028 Wilson Avenue, who stated that he represented
homeowners in the Deer Creek area, requested that the area off of Wilson
and Banyan imtnedi$tely east of Chaffey College be re- examined as he did
not like the transition that had been recommended for that area. He
asked that the area between Banyan and Wilson be zone 2 -•4 dwelling units
per acre and below that, 5 -8 dwelling units per acre, which he felt would
be more reasonable.
Mr. Leon V. Kedi.ng, CME Engineering Associates, representing Wallner
Enterprises, stated that they have filed a subdivision of 108 lots and
find the proposed plan shows hillside zoning without standards for development.
He stated that standards should be developed so that they, as developers,
would know what was expected. Otherwise, he stated, his client wants
a designation of low residential density.
Ms. Jan Peterson, Divecsified,Investment Company, Costa Mesa, stated that
they concurred with the staff recommendation for their project at Archiblad
and Base Line and requested that the proposed General Plan conform
with the Interim Plar. and zoning for that area.
Mr. Alan Snapp, architect, representing Peter and Stanley Allen, developers
of garden apartments on Highland abutting Haven, stated that they wished
to withdraw their request for a change and asked that this area remain in
R -3. He further stated that there may be some indication for additional
offices in the future, but they concur with the designation for this
area at the present time.
Mr. Bob Young, 9408 Hillside Road, Alta Loma, stated that he agreed with
the right of people to keep animals in appropriate zoning; however, would
not support a zone change in an area which is already developed that would
allow the keeping of animals. He further stated that the economy of
the City will suffer with a low growth posture and indicated that there
must be affordable housing in order to attract commercial and industrial
facilities within the City and to support future City services. He
stated that he was speakizie, for the equality of rights of those people
who are in the majority and that he did not feel that the City should zone
for a minority who want low growth. He asked the Planning Commission to
consider what was logical, fair and reasonable for the City in determining
the General Plan. 1
Ms. Mary Pollock, 9043 Cabellero Avenue, Alta Loma, who stated she was
an educator, voiced her concern for development at the top of Beryl. and
the possible impacts that would be created by putting more students into
the Alta Loma area. She indicated that education should be a great priority
in consideration. of General Plan densities.
Mr. Stan Antlocer, 8986 Appaloosa, Alta Loma, requested that consideration
be given to fire hazards that would be created by increasing densities in
north Alta Loma.
Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 18, 1981
4
Commissioner. King stated that he did not wish to talk about what had
Just been discussed but felt that the northeast corner of 19th and Hermosa
that is currently proposed for mixed use or neighborhood commercial should
go back to residential.
Chairman Dahl stated that in answer to questions relative to densities
and for clarification, Hillside Residential should not be more than 2 unita
per acre; however, the actual amount of development on any hillside
property shall be determined by environmental studies.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he did not see how that would be fair
because they would be asking a person who wants to build -a single house
to do an EIR and asked Mr. Lam for clarification.
Mr. Tar. replied that actual density would be no more than 2 units per
acre and would depend upon an environmental examination to see if
there were any special circumstances that would indicate that there should
be a lower density.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that this doesn't say that he must have an
EIR.
Mr. Hogan stated that for clarification, people constructing a single
home would be exempt from the requirements.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that perhaps the first portion should be
left to state that the maximum density of Hillside Residential shall be
no more than two units per acre.
There was consensus among the Commission that this be worded as stated.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there was agreement from the Commission on
the statement regarding Chaffey College.
The Commission consensus was that it should be included in tiie General Plan
but should perhaps be reworded and brought back to the next meeting.
Mr. Lam stated that there was one more thing that needed to be addre3sed
and that was the definition of the open space category_ Mr. Lam further
stated that there are differences between the Blayney Plan definition
for open space and this plan which would call it Hillside Residential
rather than open space. The former, he stated, was 1 per 10 acres and
he asked the Commission if they wished to retain that designation. Commissioner
Rempel stated that this should really come back before the Commission as
an open space item. Further, that he would like to have the recommendation
include the proper EIR density because depending on the .land area, the
open space or Hillside Residential might go down to 1, 2 or less units
per acre.
Mr. Hogan stated that in light of Mr. Rempel's comments, at a bearing before
the LAFC that dealt with the Foothill area when Mr. Rempel was Chairman
and Mr. Frost, Mayor, there was an agreement verbally that the foothill
area be put into the sphere of influence of the City for the area above
Planning Commission Minutes -5-
December 18, 1981
® 0
Archibald and Haven and that the density be 1 unit per acre. He
indicated that staff would like to put this information together and
bring it back to the Commission.
Commissioner Sceran'.:a stated that he would also like staff to look at
the distinction between open space and hillside residential because
he thought there might be some redundancy.
Y
Chairman Dahl asked for clarification and agreement that hillside residential
is 2 or less units per acre.
Commissioner Rempel stated that he was in agreement and moved that the
resolution be adopted with the omission of Item A and that this be taken
up as a separate motion. Further, that the Commission adopt language
that hillside residential is 2 or less units per acre and equal to the
very low density maximums and that the Chaffey College statement be added.
Commissioner King stated that he had a conflict with what had been added
relative to the definition of hillside residential.
Mr. Rempel indicated that he would elimivate that portion from this
motion and put it in a separate motion.
Commissioner Sceranka seconded the motion which omitted Item A from the
Resolution and added a statement relative to Chaffey College in the
Sedway /Cooke Plan and the 5 items shown on the screen.
Mr. Lam then read the resolution to the audience for their understanding
of what the Commission had done.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
- carried-
Commissioner Sceranka then moved that the maximum density in hillside
residential be clarified and that Item A previously omitted from the
Resolution primary to the General Plan process be adopted.
Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERAA'KA, TOLSTOY, REMPEL, DAHL
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NONF.
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
NONE
ABSTAIN:
CUMMISS1014ERS:
KING
- carried-
Commissioner King's abstention was for previously stated reasons, dealing
with possible conflict of interest.
Planning Commission Minutes -6-
December 18, 1981
9:00 P.M. The Planning Commission recessed.
9:22 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened.
Mr. Lam made a presentation on what the directions of the City are for
the future and read the General Plan goals to the Planning Conanission.
Commissioner Rempel stated that tie had a problem with the goals under
Energy. He further stated that the way it i;; worded it is impossible to
meet the goals of the City and felt that this section needed to be
reworded.
Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing portion.
Mr. Jim Banks, Etiwanda resident, indicated that he had a lot of respect
for the General Plan goals, however, he felt that they are loose and
might be interpreted in many different ways. He strongly suggested that
the Planning Commission decide. which goals are most important and which
are less important and restructure the wording.
Mr. Ralph Lewis, Developer, indicated his support of what the General Plan
proposed.
There being no further comments, the public portion was closed.
Commissioner Sceranka commented on Mr. Banks' statement, indicating that
it was difficult to come up with something specific and still have it be
a goal.
Chairman Dahl stated that his definition of goals is the maximum level
of what you are able to achieve. Further, that he dial not know how this
would be measured but that they would have to start some place and that
it would be best to start with the most important areas ar_d go from
there.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he had a problem with that since this
goals statement is to be a guideline for the :ity over a long period of
time. Further, with people moving in and the area changing, you might
prioritize in a way that what was important at a given time is no longer
as important. He stated that he did not sec how what-you put down as
foremost tonight could be held as foremost a year from now.
Chairman Dahl stated that he agreed with Corunissioner Tolstoy.
Chairman Dahl stated that to come up with specific goals at this point
in time would be difficult. He suggested that the goals be monitored In
a few years time to see how far they have come. He added that they may
not be able to measure the movement effectively, however.
Motion: Moved by Scerpnka, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to
adopt the goals as amended, and ask staff to come back with the changes
requested to the Energy Element.
Mr. Lam then presented the Housing Element to the Planning; Commission,
explained the interface of the Growth Management Plan and through the
use of charts, showed the relationship of land use, housing and income.
` '
Plaihiing Commission Minutes —7— December 18, 1981
Mr. Lam spoke of the directions of the City in the future and explained
to the Planning Commission the importance and necessity of adoption of
the General Plan by the extension date of May 3, 1981, in order that
the 1977 Routing Element' Guidelines be uGed. Mr. Lam also explained
that there must be internal consistency with all of the elements in the
General. Plan and that the Plan has seven major objectives which he
discussed. Mr. Lam asked that the Commission examine the Housing Element
and provide staff with direction as to any wording or changes that they
wished to make.
10:00 P.M. Commissioner K:Lng asked to be. excused.
Chairman Dahl opened the publ.•.c hearing portion.
Ms. Kay Matlock, Lewis Houtes, Upland, expressed a question relative to
the housing policy and asked if it was the Commission's intention to
examine only the goals in tbe! Housing Element or also the objectives.
Mr. Lam responded that it wars Staff'o intention to review the objectives
as it was difficult enough to come to ,agreement on just these without
the overall policies.
Commissioner Sceranka indicated his concurrence with Mr. Lam's statement.
Ms. Kay Matlock then stated ':hat she supported the objectives wholeheartedly
and would save her comments :-or later on more specific areas.
Mr. Don Baer, Etiwanda, indicated that there were mistakes in the comparison
of homes and their prices and indicated further that these were on page
68 of the text. He stated that this may be a mistake but a comparison
is being made between medium and high cost housing and is not proper.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that he did not understand Mr. Baer's point.
Mr. Baer stated that the whole section on housing is supposed to address
all facets of housing, low, medium and high cost it appeared that the
Housing Element addresses low cost housing and nothing else.
Mr. Ralph Lewis, president of Lewis Homes, stated that he concurred with
what Mr. Lam had said. He indicated that he has never had any problem
in providing for higher cost: housing and Mr. Lam's explanation of why
lower cost housing must be consiaered was accurate. Mr. Lewis also stated
that where more people need help is in the lower cost housing and this
could be accomplished through densities or through government subsidies.
Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt that the General Plan really does
address housing needs because when you are saying that you are setting
densities at 2 homes per acre you are providing for higher income homes.
He further stated that whenever you are legislating, you are 1, lslating
for the item that is not being produced. The lower income homes and
moderate income homebuyern are the ones who are being forced out of
housing not the higher income home 'buyers, he stated.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was.closed.
Planning Commission Minutes -8- December 18, 1981
11
11
Commissioner Sceranka stated that he wished to reply to Mr. Baer'.-3
comments. He stated that the reference to the 35 pages on goals and
how they don't relate to higher incomes in the City could be answered
by objective 3 which states that we must preserve existing housing
stock in existing neighborhoods, which he felt was the particular kind
of thing that they have been talki=;- about.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that goal number 5 to encc7 -oader
range of housing types in terms of cost, construction n:';' nd design,
refers to all income groups and all housing types. Furt.,. •-`ere was
an objective that he wanted to state a little more cleari.. ;.•t was
unsure of the wording, and that was his belief in a statement contained
in the staff report which he would like to see incorporated in the
objectives that the existing community be preserved and protected. He
asked that staff bring this back as an objective.
Comm ssioner Tolstoy stated that in reading over the objectives he found
no fault. He indicated that he had a problem with the policies and programs,
not in what they say, but in how they will be achieved. He further stated
that s.nce the Commission is talking about objectives he agreed with
them wholeheartedly and was not sure that ,ie agreed with the change
that Commissioner Sceranka proposed but perhaps sta5i could word that
in such a way that it would be all right.
Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded br Rempel, carried unanimously,
that the Commission adopt the objectives as shown and that the idea that
was stated by Commissioner Sceranka be worked on by staff and brought
back to the Commission as a possible addition.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
SCERANKA, REMPEL, TOLSTOY, DP.i1L
NONE
ABSENT = COMMISSIONERS: KING
- carried-
Commit;si.,aer Tolstoy asked when the Commission would begin the consideration
of policies and programs.
e
Mr. Lan replied that it would begin at their next meeting.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if some examples might be brought to the
next, meeting to show how the policies and programs might be implemented.
He stated that he had nothing against them, just that he had a hard time
in understanding how they would be achieved.
Mr. Hogan asked if there were any in particular thnt the Commission wanted
to examine.
Commissioner Tolstoy replied that IC, 2A and 2B would be his choices.
Chairman Dahl asked for an explanation on 3B and the definition of Block
Grants.
Planning Commission Minutes
December 19, 1981
0
City Attorney, Hopson elaborated on Mr. Lam's explanation and discussion
on those items contained within the Housing Element, stating that because
these things are zontained does not mean that the Commission will adopt,
during a specific time, density bonuses or an inclus3.onary zoning system.
He indicated that the Commission would discuss the range of alternatives
just as an EIR would be discussed, but that the Commission is not committed
to adopt all of them. He indicated that the Commission could pick -nd
choose between the programs that they feel will best meet the needs of
the City.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he would like to sec: a shopping list.
Mr. Hopson explained that this is what was contained in the Housing Element.
Commissioner Sceranka suggested that after the term affordable units and
for clarification purposes, that an explanation be given in parentheses
so that people would know what'the Commission is talking about. He state
hu would like to see the definition after the term.
Mr. Hogan asked if he was referring to specific pages like page 9, 11, etc.
Mr. Rempel stated that he wasn't sure that was necessary.
Mr.. Hogan stated that if that was the Commission's desire, that this could
be done; however, he felt that it might be a good idea to ha-.e a glossary
of terms.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he felt that was an excellent idea because
people sometimes misinterpret terms but if they knew how the Commission
uses the plan and its terms these concerns would not be there.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that when objectives are referred to they
should be in the right order because that is what confused him.
Mr. Lam asked if he wanted them to relate to policies and programs.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that if that could be done it would be
helpful.
Chairman Dahl asked if the City was obligated to adopt the policies and
programs or only to investigate and study.
Mr. Lam stated that Mr. Dail was correct, that it was only necessary to
investigate and study. Any programs that the Commission wished to recommend
for adoption to the City Council would be debated at the time that the
Commission wished to establish a program and their decision would be
based on what they think would be best suited for Rancho Cucamonga.
Mr. Hogan stated that those kinds of things are listed on. page 74, and
in the back of the document there is an implementation section which zeros
in on the kinds of things that are suggested they do. He further stated
that the concentration of effort should be focused back there and are the
kinds of things that staff would like direction on.
Planning Commission Minutes -10- December 18, 1981
�7i':
1'i
�:(
L.
14
i.
,' 1)
r ' "1
'
,!
1 '��
�
� s 14
i
,
I
(
S �
Y',
• j.
1
:�'��
irl
7i..
Y��: 1 4
1 ,
I � .n7
1,
1
� A J
�
�,'I
1
p
;.
1'i
�:(
L.
14
i.
,' 1)
r ' "1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLAN13ING COMMISSION MEETING
January 26, 1981
Adjourned Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
The adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, was held in the Etiwanda Intermediate School,
6295 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, on Monday, January 26, 1981.
Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Dahl., who led
in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESEET: CO10aSSIONERS: Jeffrey ring, H -rman Rempel, Jeff Scerarka,
Peter Tolstoy, Richard Dahl
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
STAFF PRESENT: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development;
Barry K. Hogan, City Planner; Tim J. Beadle,
Senior Planar; Edward A. Hopson, City Attorney;
Steve McCutchan, Associate Planner; Ed Villenueva,
Junior Planner; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer;
and Nancy McAllister, Secrete._y
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Chairman Dahl stated at the special General Plan meeting held last week,
the Commission asked the staff to prepare a number of items for review,
specifically Opici Winery, the Junior High desigt_ation and property at
4th and Archibald. ,Those were t� be discussed tonight; however, since
tae Etiwanda area is being discussed, the issues above will be discussed
at our regular meeting on January 28, 1981 at the Lions Park Community
Center. Chairman Dahl stated for those people that would like to speak
on community design and energy, those items will be continued to
January 28, 1981, as we have just received the revisions and wish
an opportunity to review them.
REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF GENERAL PLAN RECOMMENDATION FOR THE ETIWANDA AREA
Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff analysis
as well as a slide presentation for the Etiwanda planning area. He
recommended that the Planning, Commission review the General Plan objectives
for the Etiwanda planning area and provide staff direction on any
changes desired.
l
0
r.
Barry Hogan, City Planner, reviewed numerous requests for changes to
the Land Use Plan for Planning Commission review and comment. Input
will be necessary for preparation of recommendations which will be
'brought to the Planning Commission at the February 2, 1981 meeting.
Chairman Dahl stated he would like to thank everyone.for coming this
evening as we appreciate the input and interest. The General Plan
will determine what will happen in our City for a long time to come and
knowing that the public is interested in knowing what happens in their
area of the community is extremely important. Chairman Dahl opened
the public hearing at this time.
Mr. John Vlasic, member of the Citizens Advisory Committee, stated
the Committee has reviewed the staff recommended changes and the Committee
endorses those changes and supports them wholeheartedly, particularly
the idea of not making Victoria a continuous street. This will help
retain a lot of the atmosphere they would like to keep in the Etiwanda
area. In the core area, they would like to see nothing but low density,
2 -4 units per acre. They would recommend that commercial zoning be
preserved for other areas either below thi: freeway or the north side
of Highland Avenue. The Committee feels this would protect what they
consider to be the rural character of the area. Discussion of using
the community plan concept for the existing core area would be very
supportive, and they would like to see a time element of when this can
be done.
Mr. Jim Banks, 13181 Victoria, Etiwanda, stated the property he would
like to talk about is west of East Avenue, north of Base Line Avenue,
north of a nursery on Base Line, and south of the railroad tracks.
This area is presently planned for office and he would rather have it
indicated as low density residential. One house to the acre would be
fine. A large majority of the Etiwanda people would like to have light
density residential in the Etiwanda area. They have been told that
this is difficult becau:,e of State requirements; however he would
challenge that. The State does have something to say about the spectruu
of houses that we provide but they do not believe they have any say in
the total number of houses that they prcvide in this community. He
stated he is totally in support of the staff recommendations as made
by Mr. Lam this evening. He is in complete agreement with the shift
in density and lightening in density, but he does not think we have
gone far enough. He stated the City should decide what the people want
as far as housing and then tailor the industrial and commercial around
the residential.
Mr. Neil Westletorn, stated he would like to thank Mr. Wasserman,
Mr. Lam and members of the Commission for being concerned about the
concerns of the Etiwanda residents and their efforts to adjust the
proposals that are planned in the Etiwanda area. As a result of all
efforts, they have come up with some major concerns about the Victoria
Plan and the general Etiwanda area. Some of their concerns have been
addressed in the new recouanendations as explained by Mr. Lam this
evening. In their various meetings, it was stated they would like to
cut the proposed density of the Victoria plan by roughly 50 percent.
Planning Commission Minutes -2-
January 26, 1981
They would not like to connect Victoria with Etiwanda. They are in
agreement with hiring a consultant for a study of the entire east end
area, and to require more park and open space without trade -offs. The
local residents should be able to decide-what they want for Etiwanda Avenue,
they do not want to see multi - family residential adjacent to single
family residential, and would like to control the quality of move -on
houses. They would also like to express concern of keeping the central
core of the Etiwanda area as low residential.
Mr. R. Kleinman, stated he wishes to speak about the lance that immediately
fronts the freeway, its westerly boundary being East Avenue, northerly
Victoria Avem +e: easterly boundary 1 -15, and its southerly boundary Base
Line. In recent months, the new high school has been. proposed across
the street from the area he is referring to. East Avenue will be given
Boulevard status on one side, the other side will be the high school and
will adjoin the freeway. The present zoning is low density residential.
He asked that the Planning Commission consider higher density residential
and /or commercial to make it feasible for young people to have affordable
housing. It is his opinion 2 -4 units per acre in this location would
make the land not developable as nobody is going to spend money for a
Souse which is immediately fronting the freeway, across from the high
school, and which borders a proposed major boulevard. This is why he is
asking for an increase in density for this particular parcel.
Mrs. Marsha Banks, stated she has been attending Commission meetings for
four. months. With the exception of Mr. Lam's presentation tonight, this
Commission has shown a surprising lack of appreciation for the community
of Etiwanda and surprising insensitivity to the views of its citizenry.
For the record, she would like to indicate there has been a few people
who have a lot of time invested in this community. Those that have the
most invested and the most at stake in this community are those that
have lived in this area for years and those are the people that the
Commission should be listening to. We have a right as to what is going
to happen ir. the area. Several people have pleaded with the Commission
to preserve the rural atmosphere of the area. They don't want a manicured
city. They do not have to escape their community on the weekends as
they have everything they need right here. The school is the best
school in the west end, as they have had the best scores and they are
beating the entire area in performance. There is a reason for that.
They do not want traffic lights, left turn lanes; or sidewalks. They
don't need them. This community is something to be appreciated and
preserved. The planned community should be modeled after them. They
have a lot of style and do not feel the City has the right to take that
lifestyle away from them. The City does not have a right to crowd their
streets, schools and open spaces. Mr. Lam's proposal this evening is a
step in tine right direction.
Mr. Frank Harding, Etiwanda resident, stated he would offer his support
to the proposal rude by Mr. Lam and the changes being made west of
Etiwanda Avenue. This is a step in the right direction; however, :iris
does not go far enough. The General Plan does not properly address
itself to the problems of the community caused by high density.
Planning Commission Minutes -3-
January 26, 1981
The effects of high density and the result of population explosion will
seriously affect one of the community's most valuable and precious
assets - that '.s the children of the city. The Etiwanda schools are
consistently rated as one of the best in the .State. That quali.t;• of
education, is seriously threatened by high density proposals contained
within the General Plan. Residential growth proposed would seriously
impact the local school district, as double sessions Ere a very real
and distinct probability. The idea of busing their students to schools
outside of our city limits is a very unpopular item with the residents.
The City staff and the Council may argue that the schools are out of
their jurisdiction but to this he says they are wrong. The General Plan
will have a tremendous influence on what happens to the children of their
community. To reduce the density is the natural first step to be taken
by our city le ^ders, the second most important step would be to revise
goals and objectives on schools contained within the General Plan. The
goals should be realistic. To the members of the Commission and any
members of the Council that may be present, he would challenge them
to keep the welfare of their children foremost in their thoughts when
they males decisions concerning the f+iture of the city and especially
Etiwanda.
Mr. Ray Trujillo, stated he 'lives on East Avenue in Etiwanda. He is
in agreement with Mr. Lam's proposal this evening as well as the
statements presented by Mr. Vlasic, representing the Citizens Advisory
Committee. He stated he has one further concern and that is the
sociological factors and whether they have been considered when trying
to compress so many people in certain areas of our community.
Mr. Buster Filpi stated he would like to speak to property located on
Foothill and Etiwanda, east of Church which has been for many years
business. He would Like to see it remain commercial.
Mr. Carl Schiro, stated he has owned property on Foothill Boulevard
east of the Freeway for many years. This has been commercial; however,
the proposed plan would change it to high density. He would likc this
to remain commercial.
Mr. Andrew Barmakian stated his request is for a neighborhood type shopping
center at the northwest corner of Base Line and Etiwanda Avenue. This
is a good location for neighborhood type shopping. It is a better
location for that type of use than housing due to the traffic at this
location. At the present time, the people in the area need to go
a number of miles to do their shopping. As the community grows, the
streets will be very heavily traveled because all the people will be
shopping and going to Alta Loma for their groceries. It is necessary
to have some neighborhood type shopping facilities in the Etiwanda
area. Base Line and Etiwanda Avenues are heavier traffic areas today,
and would be a better location than trying to place it internally
within the residential sites. It is his intention that if a center
is proposed at this location that the strictest requirements be placed
on him to create the best kind of landscaped neighborhood center.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 26, 1981
Alice Flocker stated the property that she is concerned about is located
on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue just south of the railroad tracks.
The property is five acres in size and presently zoned commercial. They
have owned the property for at least 25 years and boug',.t the property
for a commercial zoning designation. They are hoping that it will
remain commercial. The people of Etiwanda have not had any shopping
areas since the General Store burned - everal years ago. This is not
a good location for residential property because of the railroad tracks
to the north, across the street is a real estate office, and north of
that the lumber yard. They are not against low density for the Etiwanda
area and they respect the wishes of the people who live in the area to
keep it low density. At the same time, it is unrealistic that Etiwanda
will not grow in tae future, as we all know it will, and it is unrealistic
to think that Etiwanda Avenue is going to remain a rural street.
8:20 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed.
8:35 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened.
Mr. David Flocker, stated he lives on East Avenue, south of Highland. He
basically supports the General Plan because without a careful plan, it
is very possible that an area like Etiwanda will end up being another
Fontana. The fact i, that Etiwanda is changing. As an example, the
new high school that will be built very shortly is going to bring
changes in traffic patterns, and more problems on the streets. Everyone
may like the narrcw streets but we might not like those streets when
we have increased traffic from the high school Positive definite
plans need to be set. The General Plan is a very workable plan and it
will allow for irte;ligent decisions of how Etiwanda will develop. It
is his opinion that if there Is not a central commercial center, Etiwanda
will lose its identity- In the future people will continue to question
where is Etiwanda until ti -ally there will be no Etiwanda except in the
history books which will be gradually changed and will be forgotten. We
do need to keep the central core, it should be kept very small but needs
to be there so that Etiwanda has some identity.
Mrs. Pat Gearhart stated it has been overheard that the people'in
Etiwanda can't get together as to what they want for the area. From
what she has heard tonight the people can get together and can let the
Commission know what they want. She was selected to canvass Etiwanda
Avenue and find out what the people owning property along that street
wanted. A number of residents have been in Etiwanda for at least a
hundred years. She visited 21 homes and of those, 16 were home.
Everyone realizes that Etiwanda is changing and it is known there will
be a lot more changes but they want Etiwanda Avenue to stay the way it
is for as long as possible. They want to stay low density residential
with some commercial zoning in certain areas. They do want some type
of identity and some type of shopping center, but they do feel we are
going to have to continue to adjust traffic flow away from the core of
the City and away from Etiwanda Avenue. 1 proposed shopping center
could be located near. the Foothill Freeoay and Highland. She can
understand some of the requests for commercial development by the
older residents as they really care about what happens to Etiwanda.
Absentee landlords could care less about what happens to Etiwanda as
long as they make their money.
Planning Commission Minutes
-5-
January 26, 1981
Don DeVerka stated he would like to talk about property on the northeast
corner of Foothill and Rochester. This property is shown as commercial
and they would like to downgrade this for affordable housing, preferably
a condo arrangement. By allowing 25 to 30 units per ac-A:,--.they-can
meet the need of affordable housing in this community. Justification
for this proposal is the close proximity of the regional center, and
the Foothill Boulevard corridor.
Tim Kelly, 722 East Avenue, stated one of the reasons they bought their
house was the rural. nature of the community. He stated he is completely
in agreement with what Marsha Banks said and wanted to thank her for
saying it.
Mr. Richard Reeder, stated he would like to address a problem that he
has seen on the executive summary of the General Plan. There is an
elementary school shown adjacent to a junior high school site. It is
general knowledge that when a jun.icr high is next to an elementary school,
the junior high kids might have an undesirable effect on the elementary
school kids. He would like to question the wisdom of putting the schools
next to each other. He is also in agreement that the density be %ept
as low as possible in the Etiwanda area.
Mr. Dave Swaithes, stated he owns property on Base Line and Etiwanda that
was the old water company building in 1937. He has been told that
regardless of what happens to the zoning his use will be grandfathered.
If the property remains commercial, if he were to sell his property
would it still remain commercial?
Mr. Lam stated if property is currently zoned for commercial and is a
presently existing use, no matter what changes are made to the General Plan
or zoning the commercial use could continue. The use could still continue
even if the property is sold, but if the use should be discontinued,
the General Plan would then be followed.
Mr. Swaithes asked if the City has talked to the City of Fontana and
what their master plan shows for the area.
Mr. Lam stated the City has taken a look at the Fontana Master Plan;
however at the present time, they are undergoing a complete revision of
their plan.
Mr. David Long stated when he moved here 14 years ago he could walk
across Etiwanda Avenue and go quail hunting or dove hunting up near
Summit Avenue. He tried to go hunting last fall and the Sheriff informed
him he could not do that any longer. He had to go across Summit Avenue.
flow much do the people that live here have to give up for progress?
Changes are going to come and we know it to a certain degree but he
is more concerned about people that will come here than the people that
now live here. People talk about low income housing so that people
can afford to live here. He wishes they would be half as concerned
about_ his feelings and lifestyle as they are about those that are going
to move into the area.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- January 26, 1981
1�l
E
Mr. R. Lawrence, stated he has lived here for some 18 years. He owns
property on East Avenue north of the railroad tracks. He has now moved
to northern California and builds affordable homes. That to him is the
future of this country. He would request that residential zoning, 5 to 14
units per acre, be allowed for his property as this is necessary for
affordable housing. The frontage of the property along East Avenue is
very limited and there would only be a few things that could be done
with the property. With the railroad track in the area, it would not
be a good location for low density residential.
Mr. Jerry Bedlau, stated he is President of the local School Board. He
stated they have a very fine school system and they would like to keep
it that way. To date nobody has talked to them about anything and have
not approached them with any plan for the Etiwanda area. Mandatory
criteria in this district has to be met and set up by the City Council.
The first criteria is the proposed project must be consistent with. the
General Plan. The second criteria is the applicant must submit to the
Community Development Director written certification from all affected
elementary, and high school districts that they will be capable of
accommodating students generated by the proposed project. The Master Plan
that they received in the mail shows designated areas for schools. The
-- school district does not own any of the property shown for schools at
this time, and the school district has not necessarily agreed those are
sites that will be proposed or where schools will be. The District will
not approve any development until there is an open door for students to
come in, as their main interest is the children. As long as he is on
the school board he will do his utmost to keep schools from becoming
double sessions and overcrowded. It has been mentioned that there is
State funding for the construction of schools. That is true, but the
schools have to be overcrowded and show the facts before the money is
available. They hope that they can work with the Commission whereas
not one child will have to go on double sessions.
Mr. Tompkins stated he would like to address the issue of the specific
plan. He stated it was asked earlier how much the people. of Etiwauda
have to give up, which is a very good question. He has found when you
make decisions it is very hard to deride sometimes what is right and what
is wrong. The problem with the General Plan level of discussion, many
times the degree to which you can actually discuss the issues isn't
sufficient enough to really be able to know the end product. Sometimes
density helps you if it is in the right location and if it is dealt with
properly. Landscaping, the way the houses are put together, and certainly
the economics can show that density can be really advantageous. The
Specific Plan that the staff has proposed is extremely important and he
would support that concept. The Specific Plan will tell you in much
more detail that you will get what you think you are getting. There
would be a lot of different land uses i.f everyone got exactly what
they proposed and we would not have the environment that you would want.
We should deal with quality and carry that approach. to as great a degree
as you need so that you not only have the right number of people but
also have the environment that you can enjoy.
Planning Commission Minutes —7— January 26, 1981
Mr. Gary Frye stated he represents the William Lyon Company and the
Victoria Plan. It appears from what he has heard that there is general
agreement that Victoria Avenue should not continue through to Etiwanda Avenue,
and they would not have any problcm with that desire. They would also
agree that a specific plan should be done. His company has spent a lot
of time and expense on the property west of Etiwanda Avenue to critique
a good plan for orderly development to accommodate the needs of the
people moving in the area and at the same time by proposing a north /south
street and removing the interchange d"signation from Etiwanda Avenue.
He stated he represents people that do not own a home and development
that is well planned and well thought out can be a benefit to the existing
residences as well as to people who r n't own a home. One of the greatest
social problems that this country is going to have in the next ten years
is that fact that a great number of people will not be able to afford
a home. If you did not own a home over the last seven years, many have
found they were priced out of the market because their incomes are not
rising at the same rate as prices of homes. Everyone has to accept the
fact that Etiwanda is going to change. He doesn't feel by cutting density
makes a general plan good because it has to meet the needs of the people.
Quality is the key. Density properly handled located and planned is the
key to quality, the key to meeting the city's need for a high image and
will supply home ownership for the new generation that doesn't own a
home now.
Sandra Barrett, stated she lives on Etiwanda Avenue and is concerned about
commercial property and shopping centers being developed on Base Line and
Etiwanda Avenue so close to the school. She asked that the Commission
consider leaving Etiwanda Avenue residential for the schools and the
residents.
Mr. Joe DiIorio, stated he has been involved with.the General Plan for
this city since before the City incorporated. He would like to speak to
the issue of balance in the General Plan. He stated this city is the
second largest metropolitan region in the country. He realizes that
people that have been mere a long time can remember the days when the
area was rural. Much work has been done in the industrial area. There
has been law suits because of imbalance. It is true the regional
shopping center will have an effect on the city which will hopefully
be beneficial. It may be the one thing that keeps our city solvent.
The staff recommendation relating to a specific plan for Etiwanda and the
area to the north of Etiwanda is an opportunity. We have tr� hone in on
some of the details that are needed and an opportunity to really go
into detail on what the character will be.
Mr. James Thompson stated he represents the portion of land that is
located east of the windrow area, west of the flood control.channel and
also connects with the proposed area for the high school to the east
of the windrow area, west of the flood control channel and also connects
with the proposed area for the high school to the east of East Avenue.
It is his opinion this property could have some commercial zoning for
shopping center or community type commercial unit3 that could be
serviceable to a community. He also asked that the Commission consider
medium density on the remaining land.
Planning Commission Minutes _8_
January 26, 1981
0
Mr. Harry Arsinage stated he has owned land in Etiwanda for about air.
' years. He will not disagree that some of the land should be reserved
for low density purposes. He also does not disagree with some of those
that would like to have commercial zoning. He believes some of our
major arteries such a Foothill, Etiwanda, Base Line and Highland should
allow commercial 2C., years from now but be left residential until then.
He believes that high density should be behind the commercial properties
on the major arteries and then have lower density properties behind
that. He thanked the Commission for coming here and getting feedback
from the people.
9:50 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed.
10:00 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened.
Chairman Dahl closed the public hearing.
Chairman Dahl asked that each Commission member give an indication as to
what they feel at this time; however specific recommendation will be
made at the next meeting.
Commissioner Sceranka stated he agrees with the staff recommendation for
-- the modification of Victoria from Day Creek to Etiwanda Avenue going
south. This will restrict traffic flow into Etiwanda area. He would
agree mere buffering is needed between the proposed specific plan and
the Etiwanda area and agrees with the shift of density, so he would
endorse the modification as proposed by staff. Moving the park designation
to the west side of Rochester, lie agrees with and he also agrees with
the modification of the density adjacent to Rochester, as it will provide
for a better buffer. The County and the Foothill Specific Plan, he
totally endorses and hopes the County will move ahead with that plan.
This will have more of an impact on the rural character of the area than
anything else. The Specific Plan for Etiwanda is an absolute necessity.
Generally speaking, it is important for the community to maintain its
character as much as possible, if that 1.9 what the people want. There
will not be much the citizens of this area can do from letting people
wane to develop here but he looks at his role as a member of the Commission
as trying to find the best balance with the pressures for growth and
providing the opportunity for our children to buy a home in an area and
environment we were raised. A half acre lot is not feasible for everyone
and we will have Lo have increased density. The city is large enough to
handle increased density without putting all of it in one spot. As far
as he is concerned, it is important to have equestrian uses north of
Banyan and important to maintain low density in the northeastern part of
our City. He endorses low density as an overall pattern of development
in Etiwanda. It is important if we are going to have low density predominate
- any particular part of the community to allow within that part of the
community, density where it is appropriate to take the pressure off of
growth and development in the future. He can't guarantee who will be on
the Commission and Council in the future but it is his goal as l+ Commissioner
to provide the best options for development in the city and provide the
best location for commercial, industrial and residential growth. The
area along Etiwanda Avenue is not appropriate for commercial at this
Planning Commission Minutes -9- January 26, 1981
particular point in time. He will not preclude the judgement of any
specific plan for the Etiwanda community but at this particular point
in time, the facts lead to the conclusion that Etiwanda Avenue is one
of the major characteristic points and it has to be preserved. He
does not see how Etiwanda Avenue can be preserved by allowing commercial
development where proposed currently. The areas proposed for commercial
along the north side of Foothill, east of the Devore Freeway he is in
agreement with. He would like to see staff come back with some specific
recommendations on that particular property. One of his major disagreements
with the General Plan as it is now structured is commercial along the
Devore Freeway and Base Line. It is his feeling in minimizing traffic
impact in Etiwanda and minimizing congestion of traffic in the city,
that is the worst place for neighborhood commercial for the community.
The only place that he feels comfortable with a commercial designation
prior to the specific plan being reviewed would be the area along P_ighland
and East Avenue. He would like the rural character of Etiwanda Avenue
to be maintained. He cotall.y "agrees that the school district should
not allow the problem to get to the point of children being bused to
other schools before building new schools. He is in support with the
city not going ahead with allowing growth unless we have service facilities
to handle growth. We need to find a realistic way of providing services.
The City needs to face the problem of Proposition 13 as the city does
not have the funds available to provide for maintenance of xistiug
services much less provide for the needed improvements with growth.
That is the biggest problem that Rancho Cucamonga is going to face -- how
to provide money to keep the existing city going as well as to provide
the balancedgrowth that will protect our lifestyle.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated he is in agreement with the Etiwanda planning
area as outlined by staff. One of the things that we need to do
is pursue a specific plan for Etiwanda. There is also the large area
that the County needs to plan in order that our city and that plan are
in concert with one another. He wonders whether the County will be that
sensitive to understand that at this point. He is in support of the
two -pecific plans. He is in support of the Etiwanda planning area. As
far as commercial, he has to agree with Commissioner Sceranka and could
not support commercial along Etiwanda Avenue. Etiwanda needs a community
identity. One way to do this is to create a focal point dnd one way to
do this is where you shop. He would propose a shopptiig area that would
be central to everyone to keep traffic down. He would agree with Commissioner
Sceranka that the area around East Avenue would be the place for the core
for identity this community needs. If everyone was to get commercial
that wants it we would have a checkerboard of commercial. As far as
density goes, he believes the Etiwanda area should be low density. The
staff recommendation for the buffeting between the Etiwanda planning area
and the Planned Community proposed is a good one. We will need to be
very careful about what goes on in the northern area of the city. It
is designated an equestrian area and we need to pay attention to that
use, equestrian and hiking trails are very important.
Planning Commission Minutes
-10-
January 26, 1981
5
0
Commissioner King stated the role of the Planning Commission is to
basically achieve a well balanced community from a land use standpoint.
The way to achieve a well.balauced community is by getting a good
spread of different socio- economic groups being represented. The
General Plan which presently exists, needs more acreage in low density
residential. It is his feeling more of the central core area can be
very low residential of 1 to 2 acres. This would also have the tendency
to affect the traffic flow on Etiwanda Avenue to insure that it can
maintain its present quality. Also, in order to aiahieve a well rounded
community it is necessary that we have density. In order to provide a
house that can be delivered to somebody in the $65,000 and $75,000 range
we would have to deal with at least ten units per acre. We should make
every effort that we can to deliver that type of housing. Good buffering
from a lower residential land use to a higher residential is needed to
provide affordable units and achieve a well rounded community in terms
of socio- economics. He doesn't particularly care for the commercial
where shown. The commercial center may be appropriate in the Highland
Avenue area. He is not sure that after full development of the hillside
area that perhaps we will need more than one commercial but this should
be more toward the Highland area. In regard to Etiwanda Avenue, with
proper land use along th "t street and appropriate configuration of the
street it can stay in its present state; however, to insure that, the
density in the downtown Etiwanda area should be changed to very low
residential. Commercial should be on Foothill Boulevard, west of
Etiwanda Avenue. Foothill Boulevard is going to be a major artery.
He is in support of the specific plan for Etiwanda; however, he does
have a few problems. It is necessary in his opinion to have a specific
plan in order to properly plan the Etiwanda area.
Commissioner Rempel stated he would agree generally with what has been
said about the Etiwanda areas as far as changes proposed by staff. The
Specific Plan is necessary. As far as the commercial, he would tend
to disagree with the Commission as far as moving the commercial up
to areas where there is no development whatsoever yet. Let's get it down
where it can be of use to the community that is there, possibly on Foothill
or Base Line. That is also the area that is going to be fairly heavily
traveled. Iie believes there is a problem in the area with trying to
get the density so low that we destroy the right of individuals to have
property and to have that property within his means. The density in
certain areas has to increase. He is not saying that this should be
done in the area east of Etiwanda Avenue, in fact, he feels it should
not be there, but in the area to the west because of the type of land
that it is and the winds in the area. It is not the best area for large
lots but an area that fairly high density can be best adapted. It is
his opinion the staff is trying to work with the community of Etiwanda
and the City as a whole. As we develop and if we work together to develop
a city that will fit the housing needs of the total population not only
'zat is here now but what is here 50 years from now. We have to realize
sere is more to planning of communities then to looking at what "I have ".
Planning Commission Minutes
-11- January 26, 1981
Chairman Dahl stated first of all he would like to thank everyone for
attending this hearing. We now, as a City, have an opportunity not to
allow uncontrolled development to take place. Etiwanda is a beautiful
community and the rural atmosphere can be preserved. With positive
thinking, with public input and public support for the officials of
the City to move ahead, what will happen will. be as you want it to be.
One of the smartest things our city did was come up with a growth
managment plan which requires a letter from the school district. He
endorses what the Planning Staff has done. The staff, working through
a committee in Etiwanda, has decreased the overall density by 1,200 units.
The turning away of Victoria Street from going through the community
of Etiwanda is very important and highly significant in terms of impact.
He endorses the maintaining of Etiwanda Avenue as it is. He enjoys
traveling up that street and the character should be preserved. He
would agree with the gentlemen who spoke to the issue of a junior
high school across from an elementary school. The staff will look at
this as he is sure the Etiwanda School District will look at it to
determine where the school should be placed. He is also for the specific
plan designation for Etiwanda as it is necessary to determine what is
going to happen in this community. He believes we need a lower density
area, an area that is rural in character. and he believes we have this
here. He doesn't believe necessarily that we want to have everything
in all of Etiwanda 2 or less units per acre but he wants to retain in
most areas 4 per acre. The two individuals that spoke regarding the
northwest section of Foothill and Etiwanda which has been commercial
for a number of years, he would feel this is the highest and best- use
for that area. In terms of the shopping center, he does not want to
make a commitment or statement concerning that at this time. He does
know the area needs a center within the confines of the Etiwanda area
as a focal point for community identity; however he would rather -tit
to address that when we have a specific plan.
Mr.. Banks stated it is his opinion that most of the people appreciate
what the Commission has said and the input that you have given us. We
all feel a lot more comfortable about what has been said.
Chairman Dahl stated all of this could not have happened bad the people
not been vocal and come forward to let us. know that you waned a different
type of planning for the area.
Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by King, carried unanimously to
adjourn the meeting.
10:10 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
JACK LAM, Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes -12- January 16, 1981
0
1
- CITY OF RANaD C.CANMIGA O lc-�`cA,Mo
S"rAFF REPORT,
o-
}
DATE: April 8, 1981
T0: Planning Commission 1977 ..
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -01 - A change in color scheme
for the previously approved K -•Mart Department store to be
located on the northeast corner of Arrow and Haven
Daon Corporation has submitted a revised color scheme for the develop -
ment-of a K -Mart facility which was previously approved.by the Planning
Commission. The approved color scheme was originally shown in a series
of blue shades. Upon further research of these colors by the developer,
it was found that these colors were not the best colors for maintenance
and weather proofing. Therefore, the developer has submitted a new
color scheme in shades of brown which the Design Review Committee has
reviewed and is recommending approval. The materials board and the
revised delineation, of the store, is available in the Planning Office
for your review prior tothe meeting and will be available for your review
at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review
and consider the color change proposed by the developer and approve
said color change should the Commission feel that this change is con-
sistent with the style of design proposed.
Pla
BKH:MV:cd
:ed,
ITEM A
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STA.IFF REPORT
April 8, 1981
Planning Commission
Barry K. Kogan, City Planner
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -03
WWATKfNS --The development of a commercia. l shopping center
within the C -2 zone on 4.83 acres located on the northeast
corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077-
641-54 through 67
This project requires continuance to the April 22, 1981 Planning Commission
meeting in order to resolve site plan problems.
Respectfully submitted,
il# K
C i �y Pl
BKH:cd
t
H iY•:'r
w
t
ITEM B
>'il
El
L
rl",j
e
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUPJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
April 8, 1981
Planning Commission
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
197
Environmental Assessment and Parcel Mar,, 6726 - Urban /Ouong- 4Jatkins
A subdiv� on of1709 acres i- to n 8 parsec for commercial use in
the C -2 zone, located at the northeast corner of Archibald and
Foothill (ref. CUP 81 -03)
The applicant is r: viewing CUP 81 -03 with the Planning Department. Therefore,
it is recommended that this subdivision be continued to April 22, 1981.
Respectfully sub m'tted,
LBH:BK:jas
A
ITEM C
ITEM D
CITY 7F RANa -10 CUCANIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 8, 1981
1977
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -06
The development of a 15,600 sq. ft., two -story professional
office builfl ng on a 1.39 acre parcel in the C -2 zone
located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard at San
Bern¢ rdi no Road - APN 207 - 191 -50
ABSTRACT: The applicant has completed the development and design review
process for a medical /professional building to be located on Foothill
Boulevard, and it is now before the Planning Commission for their review
and consideration. The development of this site will entail the recon-
struction of the intersection of San Bernardino Rodd and Foothill Boule-
vard. The building has been designed to emphasize the character of the
Bear Gulch area as exemplified by the Sycamore Inn (Exhibit "E "). Recom-
mended conditions of approval are attached for your consideration.
BACKGROUND: The applicant isrequesting review and approval for the
development of a 15,600 sq. ft. two -story professional office building
on 1.93 acres of land. The project site is located on the south side
of Foothill Boulevard at San Bernardino Road, directly across the street
from the Sycamore Inn (Exhibit "A "). The site presently contains Bear
Gulch Realtors building, and the remainder of the site is a vacant field.
The site is bounded on the west and east by vacant lands, with the ex-
ception of a small single family residence on the property to the west,
Foothill Boulevard on the north, and railroad tracks to the south. The
front portion of the,site slopes from the north to the south at a 4%
grade, the middle portion of the site is relatively flat at a 1% grade,
and the south portion of the site slopes at approximately a 3% grade, as
indicated on Exhibit "F'. The property is presently zoned C -2 (General
Business Commercial), and the Interim and Proposed General Plans desig-
nate this site for commercial uses.
ANALYSIS: The site development plan, Exhibit "B ", has been developed
in accordance with Zoning Ordinance standards and requirements. Building
setbacks, parking areas, and lardscaped areas are all being provided in
accordance with standards and policies set by the Planning Commission.
Foothill Boulevard is a Special Poulevard on the General Plan and the
applicant has proposed to landscaoe it accordingly. The intersection of
San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard will be redesigned to eliminate
the existing single lane transition from San Bernardino into Foothill
Boulevard beyond the traffic signal. San Bernardino Road will be curved
ITEM D
DR 81 -06 -2- April 8, 1981
Staff Report
up to join the signalized intersection and access to the project site
will be from a single private drive off of San Bernardino Road across
the front of the property. The redesign of San Bernardino Road will
necessitate the reconstruction of a portion of San Bernardino Road and
Foothill Boulevard, and full street improvements will be required. The
development plans as proposed will require a total of 78 parking spaces,
82 parking spaces being provided and one loading space. A detailed
hydrology Study has been prepared to analyze the drai,)',,- of the project
onto adjacent properties. The Hydrology Study ,ia�; ueen reviewed end
determined satisfactory by the City Engineer. Appropriate improvements
will be required to handle any increased flows.
The elevations, as shown on Exhibit "D ", indicate the use of light
brown exposed aggregate concrete, redwood fascia, dark brown wood trims,
stucco, and solar bronze glass with anodized aluminum frames. The ap-
plicant has indicated that additional redwood screens as indicated on
the elevations will be provided to adequately screen any roof mounted
equipment. Details of this screening will be critically reviewed by
Staff to insure that the screening is totally compatible to the building
design. The illustrative site plan, Exhibit "C ", indicates that an
abundance of landscaping will be provided for the project. Colored
elevations, renderings, and building material samples will be available
at the Planning Commissio- meeting. The Design Review Committee has
reviewed the prcject and is recommending approval of the design with
emphasis being given to landscaping throughout the site, particularly
the parkway landscaping. The Committee also recommended that the
character of the surrounding area, commonly known as the Bear Gulch
area, could be accented by providing a dry stream bed in the parkway
landscape design. ,
Part I c` the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is provided
for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the
Environmental Assessment and determined that although the project
could have a significant adverse impact on the environment from off -
site drainage, adequate mitigation measures have been proposed to
eliminate any significant adverse impact. If the Commission concurs
with such findings, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration would
be in order.
KI
fit
also 101-21
isles III
a �,
Dot 81 -06
Staff Report
iWE
April 8, 1981
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review
and consider the various aspects of this project. If the Commission
concurs with the findings and analysis of Staff, then appropriate
conditions of approval are attached for your review and consideration;
Resp,actfully submitted,
Ci* PianneV
BKN:DC:cd
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Location Mar
Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Illustrative Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Perspective
Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Part I - Initial Study
Resolution/ Conditions
El
11
f'S!'H1. G BLVp
qW COV N KXXo Nap
CiT Y OF
RANCI10 CUCATMO\TGA
PLANNING DIVISION
�s
ITEM: 2R, 51-04
TITLE- 51 Tro "N
E,`CHIE3IT = 6 scALE-
:
V
NURTH
7
r%
� 1
1
� �e1'�
rat
I�� ■I
, lip
r
+'
`
�1
W
1 �
r,
A
..
y
7'
IJ...
NURTH
CITY OF
RANCI •
. � /
PLANNING DIVISION
EXHIBM-C SCALE.
CITY OF
RANCHO CL7C.AMO NGA
PLANNING 1DIVIS7ON
E
'V
NORTH
ITEM:
TITLE: G'OA�c�'ic��d, CaRAiJ(i+�6s
EXHIBIT: __-f�- SCALE;_
- r
r]
c �
CITY. OY RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT rNFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
applScation, the Environmental-Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee *,rill meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Sycamore Professional Building
APPLICANT'S NAME,
Bert C. Francs
8363 Foothill Blvd
Rancho Cucamonqa,
ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
(714) 982 -8827
NAME, ADDPESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Bert C. Fran cis_..(same as above)
LOCATION OF PROJECT
_ 8363 Foothill Blvd.,
A�PJ 207 -19 -5J0
I
(STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
ancho Cueamonqa, Ca. 91730
1
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: ,
- T--f
WILL THIS PROJECT:
Ohl YES NO
_ NO 1. Create a substantial Chang- in ground
contours?
_? 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
,0 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
NO 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
NO 5: Remove any existing trees? How many ?NONE
_ NO G. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: NONE
AML
f)'
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page. NONE
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be requireate mitted
before an adequate evaulation can be .DeveReview2ommitteDate p Signatur
-r 3
Title OWNER
S -
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT- 15,600 Square Foot (approx) 2 story
Gommerc�al Condominium, ProTesslona Ti celru Ti ding . o a o- SS
parcel of acres approx is to be developed and completed sith this
project. Architects full description is attached herewith.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: APN 237-191---J approx 1.39 acres
Existing Office Building approx 800 Sq. Feet. Propose bui ding to
be approxirnate y quare eet. 2 Story Structure with andscaaino
DESCRIBE THE BNVIRONM NTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
--
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING. PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Parcel b,*jq@._is fairly level setting directly south-across the street from
cire- Famotts'syt alaore- ITrn— cx?sttrrg -s ZirLs-0 M' „d
A3ed"i'iT-L`ITt'SC't'�Si1 "'fGT' Tf` S"$' EY' tl' Cttll' p— }}12--•L�XTS-�'i11gT'�7t11"'to. e i:Fl
- �- a•1•ac,Ad-- �:�th-t# �- pr= a}, osed- fieh�- 9ei- ldi•n, ^- ��io- laad•-
_�a)_lnw_•aiuii,uyt .under a�„ rta1�! eed�haxemP. nt _..coniroLS�is..��.i11_isi£lue. �_
surroundi-) g prooerty to improve and unaradp accord ingJY Property on
either side is, at this time un- improved. with the exception of a small
house.
Is the project, part of a larger project, one ok a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environ.•nental impact?
NO
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -06
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AT SAN BERNARDINO ROAD IN THE C -2 ZONE.
WHEREAT;, on the 30th day of January, 1981, a complete application
was filed by Bert C. Francis for review of the above - described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 8th day of April, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of
the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in
which the use is proposed; and,
2. That the proposed use, together wit. ti;e conditions
applicable thereto, will not be datrimertal to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity; and,
3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and
4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General
Plan.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse
impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on
April 8, 1931.
SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 81 -06 is approved
subject to th ?_ following conditions and attached standard conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. That a five foot wide planter shall be provided along the
east side of the easterly driveway, which shall include
shrubs, trees, and mounding to the satisfaction of the
City Planner.
2. That a dry stream bed, using natural alluvial rock, be
incorporated into parkway and on -site landscaping to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible.
f
V
Resolution No.
Page 2
ENGINEERING DIVISION
4. Access to the site shall be restricted to San Bernardino Road.
Reconstruction of the.Foothill Boulevard frontage will
be subject to Caltrans plan approvals as well as City
requirements.
5. Street vacation engineering for the ramp on F=oothill Boulevard
will be the responsibility of the applicant. Additional
right -of -way dedications on Foothill Boulevard may be
required.
6. Private drives shall not encroach upon street right -of -way.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE ZITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Cemmisslt
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 8th day of April, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
11
LA
4^
L
U
n
E
W
4
W
Yl
H_
r4?
V
V
O
0
N
O
iJ
b
!.l
N
•ti
A
C
d
N
O
p
V
A
M L
✓
w r
•�.
C 4
N
V
P
'�yCNA
U�
^I
O
V
N
Y
YO.
j.14
V
C
Jan
al "1
aN.
`. ..:
wL4
u
ri
uli
✓ W
G
•L^-
�
u
o q
i
o w N
c
o
N
V
Y
P
J
•W
V
` O_ O V
L
r
•L.• d A O
�
L W
a V n
AN
r
d
�
�
^yNIP
WL
LG�
L,
N4
V
W
•
q
AMC 4
«
�+.•.
L
qp
NL
L
O�
..W
N
p
i
Wt'iu
q
c
q• L
y
«
Yuc^
•Or
q
r p V N u
«
°'
g r N
V
q L
L
tl
N
w
9
V
✓
� 6 •- M L
u Y�
p.
L
9Y-
Y
•�
9
N N ✓Ji
CrL T
P
[
4L
C
d
y
OI
W
N C •^ J
M
V C+
Y
V L
O V<
_
C. S
S
•v O
L C
9
(�
W r� N G
V
SI C N� P
.r
W
C q�
u
O
T
q
Y
y
S
9
q
Y
q T
P W N
nC1 F
u L
y
L
G
d
•^ C d C CI
y
•^0.4NW
d
O
WO
V
N C
9
L q
Y
Nd�6
p V
�r
Y
Y
YF-OyP
u
J•l
y
.V�
q
O
9
L
CI-
^
CJaq Y
VV
CN Y
�
L�
✓
E C
YI L
q_ w
T
v
�• .- L O
d N
c u[ V d
q
n'
y C b
N
p
1J
L
q
tl
✓•
q
+
^rI
^ C
O H O C
Y
O
W If S y
u
C O
N b
u
V
O
} n
J
S
N
d V q
r-• C
✓ W t w Y•
•0 6
LEi
q
T O
O
•
L
9 Q
J
O
Y P
N v
e
.
«
q
c c
r
r+
w T
c
w
'
s
i P fi
E�p
q
+LY T
L L
"i.
q6W••0
AJ
✓i"
V.:✓6.'•V
�p
V
OC P
q
p�i
dp
VY
L
O
P
' „ L
N
L
V
>
Y
�I
r
N
C
LmY
L +
N
CO L •
>•l
W�CCW
u
YL•O+
t
W •
O
u4C
WN
NV•�
O.
JI.S
OV
L'
•^
PO•-'A
W
Gq �q�
^V
d A
U
T
VT
JC
c c
L
MI c
N
W
Cq
^ ✓Yd u1'
c nA c O
•}+
V
�
L V�
N O •^ o O
�N
•"• �
i d
\•��
P.
WJ
Y+
O_I
N
N G
�-
x
M
�`.
P N
L
O•"•
« 94✓•ti
qL
N
= ^y
CPu
utl.
a
u.O -
ocy O
V
L Y
nO P
W
V. C
V
4
C �•EOJw d •pLL•✓
VC
O N q «
y C
1�m
NV•�
G
q Y✓
N
d
J
V
C
M
V•m
y¢
L a
•^ C
JV
V L
'^
+ S
C
O V,;7 W L
PwF 9
C
d
g r 6 d (a q
u
• Y
N V YI
N
J4L
Vtl'
LV
A p
i
JT
PI VO L
Lu
WJ3A
Y
u
N
wi'I
•
^N GL'
WL �U
��
q
� A
d
iJ
^
LOJ9 N�
W U V C +
yI
qV•. -XMU
V q p V
NW
�•
dL~
L W
MN
✓ t
Q N
C
{- ✓ L
K
••-
•>♦
^ N
L N
W
4 •F
O L L C C• W
L P
Y
L
o
=
n
Q q
N O
•/1
••C• S 1- S
W O
J Y Y g L L
1-• W
N S«
✓
n..•
N •.'•
N
I•l
N
ttOV
rI
•r
I
.W..
I
'•�
.Nr
rT-
I
I
I
N
I
N
I
N
NI
N
�
V
u
L
p
P O
•r
N O
O u
W
O
J (� V�
O
q .0
t+
V
OC
CV-
L ^G
dELw
� °v
PV•-
_Y
•d.•P
T
J
N
C N
V C
tT
V U O
y}
Or
�
°'
o
N
i N
c ��
�.: cl c +N
•` n
AL
aNc
�c
—Y
�a
NI
cu
dqo du
Nn
cq
+W
qL0
qq
'I LM
6�
y�Y
FM
}N9
pG
O✓^
C'
L C
Y+-
P q
do
^I�
q•"^ +•L(
NCy.
WW
JYr
l6•.
S
}A
�VN
�•C
SL
U
J
� M
O�
C
NA
aP ✓CO
C
Ql
9(n
6G•✓
n•^
V y
4 O
A
N d •^ N d W
�
{{ N
9 N C
Nu
�•^
~O
�O
'JW
m
L•N
O 7
q•^
V
tp 1.
9.4
W
�••V•9 NWT
//
b`
0� O
cn
•^
nd
I.
G
✓
O ll J d
01
J
N L
✓p
_.
«V
rt qcC
M9N 'pw .T.
,�iu
VV
.J
QNY
�O
9JC JCC
y�f
Nn
+
ll 9
d q
d C O O ii
O
W
fi` OI
Iv
d9
q�
O`•'0
LN
lt+ VV
>it
6
Cr I
q
� V
w
Y L
O N C O C
^
q 9 N q O
C Y•
O N
^ C
O
•�U..
V
Y. 0i
�L«
Ow
I u W
W•1 •^
^ N
N+
Fin: V
C^•^ T
C 6 O O
N
L
P•^
O
a +r l
1) J i
p
=
I
O y
tT
C' Y
u
O C
W M L
L C^
✓
V S 0J V P M
W
+ d
1
m
V
.^
•-'
q LI
•'• n
J N j=
N o �
v i o L
s
N
0F0,
C
Q u
Y A+
J
N 6.
w� 6
Er G 6 0 G
4
_✓ O y C
C �' U
C
AO
'^
Nqy
OC
q.
BOA NNd
V
_
wj
n
2
t]�
F.2
OMr. ✓
✓
b
O^
T
NN
fTy4
W W
dT
�_ L .�
M•O
O L
VA•^
C N J u
n
6 6
C F
N
P+• C
N+
N
L C fl
q p1 q
p n
q V P O •^ O
•'- S
W✓ S
^ C
W
}O
mu
J: OHO
L a C
L✓
"J'
V
�
V Oi
u
+r C
^
N 'J C L
d
�a O V
N V
P N
L✓ n 4•
y
C
4 ✓•{
^�
L9•^
1 q«6
�V
LNN oy�
W
s
PLC
q
n
•L
Y• C.^ q
}
p •n w
L
N
N
P
O nf• J
O :1
V��
Ox
q.
j, qqy
06
u�r poY
ll ..�
6
�
U
r
W d
W •^
d O�
N
C`
•W C •�
Y
O
O M
V• W
L
L
u
Y
G
J
J
C
�✓
+
A
�!
N S•"•
wJ
q%
^ p. N W
u LL
N
O N
UL
N C
d�n•
y
.c
3'
^C
Yn••-
NnJ
nW
PL•r•
qWa
V L +N
NL
O
A dd
CC LCL
+L
CO
lTd
V_ >> P
L
N
yl
y
N .�
4: N
L
K« M
1- :� {- Y
i1 V
4'-• q 6 «✓
H ••-
K W J
Q O Y f
.•
CW
~
N
•.
C L
Y
1JI Y
U
�
`�
pN
r
N
O
t0
T
�
'
.y.
N
`1I�1'1y�
``•O
\AyI �f�4
\
^I{
\y�
VI
K J
F•
Kv
•ti
v
W �^
iijw o
4 V L C L 4
O y 6 N q
q.-t CO
q u t q ✓
6NC °n0
yd,WJC U,.
N T U q P
6 q « V N
C aLi W +N-
ONY OrV�
q C d T
N C✓. 1
ggN��q
y V 6
ta. ^•GO U✓L
W NI •_ G u
L 6r. p•
C 6Vr T W
w N L 0 u
O OdWq
cuAVc
^ iwN«�Ic
✓ 60 L
Y J
NNnq «y
_1
q
W
t
N
u
L
°
w
E6
V
Q
V ^
N
9 x
r
P' T
w
L
q a
n p.
c
Y
gl ^�
W
V
W O
c L
V °
N L
n N
C
W O
y s.c
Y °
„ d �
r
L l Y
N �
� W
^ W O
ova
W ✓ L
Na°.q
O
C N 0N
P ' q
^ 6 .°V• N
C L
.2 2
E Y f o
gcNO
w N
w�Lv
y Vq-rq
G pC N
Wu a
Y q 7 M
N V
6
D
s
a
a
N
s
c
✓o
c
a
C
111
N
��
^ =u 9 Ud V
YrLr
^
V
V L
G
• N
V
Y. N 6� J� Y P w
y n J
„
yY
yl C
�
C V
Q
d
N
N
L O
d •^ L
6
N
�•L
C
Tlu 4•p.�CgCI°
NUY.
^
q
OV
c
q x oL.^ua °u
aN
A.'
U Ort •.- N
y
N 6V dLy
c•
yFr
«
N
LL In
�'cv
O
C V
q.r
✓
y
•
NL
Vx
VA
E
G
.'P
Y
(nC VVyr- V -.u� -«
qYN
NA
P^
✓
Y•
4
W
« p
q
V K
—0
O�
•^n
Lv L''V %Y•LN
E�•°
WLO
°y4
Ly
N
d`
wngv
^6
09
rw•w
q
c «��yrc L
LJ
4UN
LlV
� ^r0 °rLU �
nA
Ly
M
°.�
�✓
^NYO
V�
I6M
G��
aLV Ow=•
�VV
Lx
Np.
l
C ^.T
LNq
CLL
N`
«
N
C
i.O
= p C
O
'ti N
C
V V O
N V •_
U
q
W� l
y -0•�q
q u
6L'
iV
«
G
uTq
Gq
C
du
q
v1 CL.�q
u
N
PA
c
q
JYq
OL
.rL a�
� °c
na
�
4
V
L' q
E
t U
•�
aV 1r u16..PrC
C(V
qU
6 N
y
N
LOC
N
q q PY
W
V«
y.•. y:
LY
Vq
d4N
4'
V
>VU
C q
d
VV�G
6Y OC Yd
Vpp
'
NY
PL
n°
.r ryi. g
C V
CMS
A�
���>
u
N.rl
VOA
V
J6
P�
V
O V V V O a
A 0 6
YpM
",IO
z
L
N C L
�L
PO
q
q L
y 1.
°
NYC
L
N
°•��
L �
UeI
y°
n0
dLC
.r
�^ �
tnc
�.°-�
Y'
« r n O
g
L`
^fdl •_tTjV�«
1] C
OJW
`G�
W q
�Y•�
O
P
O
W
O.
d•^q
NA
N VO4p
qV^
Nd
C
qV-^
1'O YN
NL
L
u2P
qy
^CC
d
~CA
�
^�
�.I.
dNNq
` .t••_Q.il
d�N
C^V
d
•V•. q
V
dL
L
q
N�u
V
O. L T N
6
Cd
�
p�P.Vir
�
WO
VI.V -N
o
vv
Y ..- yWA ^MOr
UN
W
�
�vd
-q
pd
EL'
6 ^N
✓
A•�
OOLV
}rAq
AA
dU
Y-N
Q`
°r ^€
�.�
V
AF
yOa JU~JV q
VV^
L«
.uL
V
CI4
q
n
C C
r C A •C' J V 6
O L
Y .
C d
yy
��yf
^ N v
N ^
N
..5'- N ... -a«i nc_
P�q
�a
C Ll A
� ^o
[ d
c.c--
•e .N
°ii..
f gym^
w
^NrGe .^c.2
^N�jS �y
^6
N c
uL«
NL
c n^
No
4 •Lir P¢
4
•�pv��
Q rn^d V r V N
6
Wu
H �
w
y
K G
T✓ 1`
J ''
r` O-0
Y� O 4
r-0jr u
.rni
w
Y
L q
�
J
V�Y
W
`uuV L
WW
ti`U4�q
•^
Y
KO
.K
C
6
4rN E`
�(
y.
y
c �o
^N
ocN•Y-
L
°
WOY.
4
4
O
1-•L.
-L^ O
6a
b
a
A
v
W �^
iijw o
4 V L C L 4
O y 6 N q
q.-t CO
q u t q ✓
6NC °n0
yd,WJC U,.
N T U q P
6 q « V N
C aLi W +N-
ONY OrV�
q C d T
N C✓. 1
ggN��q
y V 6
ta. ^•GO U✓L
W NI •_ G u
L 6r. p•
C 6Vr T W
w N L 0 u
O OdWq
cuAVc
^ iwN«�Ic
✓ 60 L
Y J
NNnq «y
_1
q
W
t
N
u
L
°
w
E6
V
Q
V ^
N
9 x
r
P' T
w
L
q a
n p.
c
Y
gl ^�
W
V
W O
c L
V °
N L
n N
C
W O
y s.c
Y °
„ d �
r
L l Y
N �
� W
^ W O
ova
W ✓ L
Na°.q
O
C N 0N
P ' q
^ 6 .°V• N
C L
.2 2
E Y f o
gcNO
w N
w�Lv
y Vq-rq
G pC N
Wu a
Y q 7 M
N V
6
D
s
c
✓o
c
a
O
C
T t�
L O
d •^ L
6
p
LV.•.
q
U Ort •.- N
d
S
W L
d �^
C V
q.r
E
G
•...
W L'
•q p• y
4
W
« p
WLO
wngv
T
G��
L
l
•-• n
«
N
u t Y
O
O.
C
W
W
U
W
W� l
VTjr
aJ
L ^P � W«
y
O
L.
�
4
V
L' q
E
t U
C`
C
6 N
N
q q PY
d
q
N
C q
d
W •�
L q^
'
N'L
V
Wu LL6
^0
E
�
YpM
L
uV
PO
q
°
S
N N
VOr6rr
N
6 N •
y
V
q
« r n O
g
L`
V � t7 L° c
W q
y
y
•- N
y
W
O.
4W' W
V Y N
� 6
•r- C A
n
O V C
^
�
•.•
V C
l d V l Y P
�
^�
q
� 6 V q
i 9
A
•V•. q
V
(j
L
Q
qP
V
O. L T N
N
.uL
W v —o-0
w
Y
�
J
V�Y
W
`uuV L
WW
ti`U4�q
•^
Y
KO
.K
C
6
4rN E`
�(
y.
y
c �o
^N
ocN•Y-
L
°
WOY.
4
4
O
1-•L.
-L^ O
6a
b
C
Y
A
•
JI
v
W �^
iijw o
4 V L C L 4
O y 6 N q
q.-t CO
q u t q ✓
6NC °n0
yd,WJC U,.
N T U q P
6 q « V N
C aLi W +N-
ONY OrV�
q C d T
N C✓. 1
ggN��q
y V 6
ta. ^•GO U✓L
W NI •_ G u
L 6r. p•
C 6Vr T W
w N L 0 u
O OdWq
cuAVc
^ iwN«�Ic
✓ 60 L
Y J
NNnq «y
_1
q
W
t
N
u
L
°
w
E6
V
Q
V ^
N
9 x
r
P' T
w
L
q a
n p.
c
Y
gl ^�
W
V
W O
c L
V °
N L
n N
C
W O
y s.c
Y °
„ d �
r
L l Y
N �
� W
^ W O
ova
W ✓ L
Na°.q
O
C N 0N
P ' q
^ 6 .°V• N
C L
.2 2
E Y f o
gcNO
w N
w�Lv
y Vq-rq
G pC N
Wu a
Y q 7 M
N V
6
D
M
W
b
V N
L
T
p d
• Am
Cw
`
Pqr� V4V
9 w 9
n A
•C
I u✓
n
T n w F9
'
V J
t V
LL G !_ J •• C
O � r-
L
T
W ¢ � Y V
Or V
L_
V p ✓.
bTl.
. -..-«Y C ~YA
C y0'
y V O O
•
n VI I
V O.
P L
�
Y 0 9
N P
G .r• p b .J j
q �
J
9`°
a Y
� N•
0
w�
•• C � i T� lVi Y
4-
UY O
LL
�u �
V w�V
qVp � N n• 9N
✓�«
Y
Ll <
u p� C
up Nc
G ^�
«o
«J•>- IOW
P+
(y r
W.dC ioy
•($
W
Y-
L
4: V J LL `l r• V'^
Nr C U R' r
per•- P� L
•
«I N
r- p• � L
W � wp PY n
b V O
C Y V
¢�
m
V'
¢D
C
°4�
L'O
lq[„Al1 VGG •
V-
q C3
¢C W w C
W11 (�}
X
cCL
>�A
>qV
Nt,f
YC
�UV
NGN SVNW
c «Y cuw¢
O
9
ON W'[ n°1 rrgC1 P
•ald
WL qLV
V
•c
P
iN
9wC W
W9 YOL
N
A g
O
2
^ l
^
O. •Y-
L C
N L LLI • v L N
9
S
4d.
p C V 0.1.0- 9
T
a81
�Yb L�
•W..
NUJ
�1y
VO LJ pV0 b
AP
J
SOW
'.9
�u >�
MOVIL
�
QIO�
VL
yMU
CVIg4
Y>
Y``J
S!
L Ps
PN 'yam r-
V
NO�w
14CV
L�
•2 .Q
w
4 99
'>C 217C JY
TC 9[1
L✓
YO-Vw
C�ad•wr 1pu•
Y
Y ^
N �n r'l A•V PpL
D° VyT
O
Aar
D
YI •.- w` WP`W
6� L W
.•. pJ•
jl
-Y Np j qj
9V NN.�
C
u p^
6� Y•
}�
D
2 t
m V V
•yI 2
W A 9
a
i�
P'R � C 1' rn N r u
p y .O
N T L
(' N N P
L V 4.--
N
L�°
4Lq
�m�qq 9bti•il
.�
` NY
VCL �� VAN W/
L2 pI rVjD
^J LV1r
PON
ALL'^
l ��6 >GP�
a«n}9 DAri
`
V m9
Jl -
r�
6•G'
N•r O D t
r
q •. V
Z
TJ'N
n
� y G
N C W> q q V W O
1
•��
V --
V •O Y• C
L•m i
«E
.r
nv
°Ow
We
LCI n- oL
�
L
!«
N�°- « Jdio
ua�aT._
c
N A9N
-
�.°• «.W.
wo�T� .diu"`�i
Na`W
-A oc ••
�.-
�•Q
a«cc• A.^
LV L
9
T qq ¢ pq�l
Gq- c
w.v 'r•q' qc
o
Fv
N= � F
�IUIU O.N
„ V „p
-
LN qN
N
LV'1 9L
� .-p2
fir^ Nc
V P � p� V•��
C T 6p O
2Y v��R
A u¢.
CAN
c
A�L�
°W
�v� t q Ir
L 9Vra
V 26
JI'.
.^ -41 �Lw.•
qW (�IryN
udi
pO wAL
«1• Yom¢
O O�� wPi L8>•
9 A+-t
yW
y
P�O
ti
V Vq}
YI>i�lb
Y�C9yJ VV Cp4
p
�� Lxq
F > NS 4•V9� bV
VY
pP
O
O
udVO
001 vl. 2`T E
SQ
q
P� C9l W
Gfi P
qVN
¢E.+«
gOOL
L��¢
6 CI.
l•u� +�
u
99 -G• yG •.C•9r -N rb
Wvl r.vvp
�
�I
r°-OEY
OV Nib ON.�
O
W
•^> UAL
IJ V
O 9� C H�
AD
6
w_•• -•-
1n 41
L
>
> a L c ul b
h
ag' ivuviiJ
In
G�u Q�u
au w
•�
GI
IOI •`I
^I mI
ClJ
VI
N.
1
W
�1
W
u
z
Vy
L
{I
d V CONS G
Nr Oy9CL m N G
L V
q 6 Y••
Y TI .n
L
�L
V i
Y � l
L
V•
N L N Y
c C �'�' O^ q �'•0' N
'^ 1-
A!
b O
C O
C` 9 0.
O
+ 4 b d L L L
Y O N • �_
P N p
¢
� +Lid brNZO �
VCL
L
N LV
wLT 2G 0�
t«
L•••r` 20^ NG n
4N9u
i
F
O rL
«
mm
�
Yr «qN N°
r•1`••UNW
T••C• Li+
C
U'
�"
N y � j
C'�.,
l •) N J V W 'L
q
-
ly
m
V
L O V � U A �
V
(:i
w VWV�
C V
n'• Nw
wb V •��
L
N
L- 90TInC
LVw�YV V; V
dt: >q
pq a�
`o
PO' Lu
F=�L
N
F N•YU
�
q
cYip �r`. «tq
o «`p
4 N�
NV
Y
6or N�u}b
p tL- ••.'"II }c
R.YSN O �. «6 .•.
d�Va
` pC
uW
F
L>f�Y
=.-
•p L «C 9 « C
Non
AO
N°
L
C�
« VN
<
q'T q
C - J-•'J
Er^9 �+u �N•>n
l L w«
9w
C Y
Q9
�D
2> V W
� N A N
}w
•• T q y u O� Y 3_ '^ A •�
«f
r- � N>
O
L
J6 9W>
4
w
A ^•` 6TH N6
VN`q
Lp
AO
r-
O
t(J1}C9 p
�TLO PNLV
2NIn
�
waN
O•U �6Y�
�TWiL
V
¢ YIlN
V- 9 ° ••• ` D
Lq
9P
VC N N m Y
N M 9 O
°Ju }pw
NCLr
Wm
VGV ti
ViYL.
N
M >�
o 4 t
.•C.A M
o !Ui •.r o u N c V r 9 •- N G
•^.I C•
q y V .-• 1111hV-
q
V
N N N VYi
NSS V «V CV C
LL
¢61O
p
J L
C •• Y w
V A•�
V
P
O LQ
«q2 iRN�
CN
2 0
W
N VL�O
2-2 •+
E IU ••`•- 2q• ^O CT-"•G
Y
•
V
,'r«
�> j V
L
p� q N W
L LV 9
N V d Niw
OL Xo1'-
?� ^'
Yp
A
q
8r
1 Vrn•-
t
> 4 >
9
r
O O �«N V
L O OL ^ a p y
r
q
i
C
u ?
1
L OL N
oc4
w -
D �V
a% a
L ^
W N°'
a
x
L c ot u co N
L t « b
n
V .w T, «
iJ n
i c
•^
¢
¢ N
•� s
9 W L u u Y L N
9 F •^ ••• •• ••- u .-n a ._
N c
b
•- � I
McN
v «
wN¢ i
.°.•
n s„u, °9 ao-•
2 �.N.ngbr �p s c
n.�J.°.
2 n� °D
'6
P
Li
M
VON
^ur9�gl•.N Lq�N
N
NO•^
..-
ANy 00V•°r0
m'9
YE DV ° O9 NC•^_ C
Oq
Y 6 C
A �"•
+•1:01 N O�-N 9
•• W••- N6
•^ �.^ V
=D C
O q 1 C
W N
t
C N q
L m w pI
t` J L I �• C
O V
N _:
•n L •q,
�- P
Y V C
V
p!
G 6L4.Nq Jp
2VWOC
V O' �� nlL �•
.PmA °V.n 9 Y FV
Yy Jy.
V
9
2 WfJY
T
TuL.O•N
ACL
¢ni�q
LN ^•
C•-9
}MJ V
qU
VT�Y Ov
yO 99 u „YN ^•-
N`06
N¢
^VY gOyN
U� �.O
VLV
9LV OJwP
L^Jq as N}i -CI
pJ 6rV
L'F Vpy,'^a
-m
Tr
VI�VG
rOOw
LL ¢n.
NUJ yI
dVA
uN�
J°
L �j O'^^ V'
�D4•
=LN 4° .-L
L H •.- + ry V T W b L N C C
F t� y
> 64
O.O
LLG
fkM
L 9
1"•'�m
m U
NO
4 N
O.D V2� N¢
0.Oq SLlVY LD UD F -'-'^>
ON
M
Dry.
L
n
yc
F:
L
L
S
O
M
O
M
rO
U
V
Q
N
W
T
?
b
C
y
Y
� I_i .n
+l
bN
o
Lea
�c dN
r
WcN
«�
v.yn
'J
c
oWC2
�
•-• ° vG
on«
c L
w
N
'F'
m
L'°QN
y
rn
°✓b co
Lo+.L.
CO uu
Q
POa
¢�OpY
WL
V
N
�CPyV
�^OT
«
Z L
C V
U
WN
V VW
^
L
N
O
LWd
E
YDL
W`Pq d.-
1A
°pUw
L
4
LC
.-POV
>N
u..
J
ENO
2
b
Ny_J
P�
C° AL
u I;N
>L-
i40
w a
W
N9 V
a
Eu0
V N
N
O
.O-._
VW;~
`
d Y q
yI L
" W
OJ V
d
N Y
�
N
p .O.r
��
C..U•
{
i u W
I=
N v C 'O
la W
L
CWE Y O
A L. �
YI < aOr u
Y
V u
N °✓ V 4
4
O N
� L
C
P G6
^
> duY
qJ�.L
WV
Y.O
OJAV Vr
N
NW 4,
wu^ yV
a
l
^T
p
W O
q
u_c
r
Lq�iG pw
N
N
Nr
✓r .Y
NV
Pq
G
.O-
dVL
I
O
l..L.
1/>, n•,
+cT
O
Ac
Cl
fJ N Y.
L
V
t:
LZ
O
a
q
4 •-. O n.
�
�> l
W ON C•
(W(��
` a
L
N
O V+
O
C V•L
p
W.�
`yUjI
C >
L
Q 6
Y-
G
T.•. 4
Y � N L
W V jJ
E. ti
r L
•�
.� d
° Ll
^ N U L
� N NT
q
I
�NGnN
.-..
T.-. V M
CS
YV ��
A6C
qu ^�
^A^ V
LN
'O •_
rVU.N
«� �"•�
«G
nn
Y .nCa a
N VV
V
Ord
ALC^
-1-
N
N
«L.°O.N
NWu
LI UVY <L
^
6LiV
z4 V W
LWY�.n
•..�
YN
rNL
�'W
V'�
Ww Wd
VY
n
N O O K
< V
6 r
mt
W L V pu
¢ u<
�
ti^
S G
V V
O
7
C
�
C
P
O
C u
pq d
V
'O.•q.
mod.. -y+
N
_
J O A N
�
c
i5 p A O
Tl P L� p
L9
C
CCi
^
c v
V
P 4 u
W
O
�
C L N
y
P
V
l V
V
y
- ••
t
L N
W
N
L i
luYC Y ^u
POEPV
V A O
...L
1
��
L
O
fJ1
D•
N J
�G
„
�
u..�
L L L q .n
M O
w..
C •"V\
°
N
O
P° A
� L N
L?
L
°
Y
u W
d p y L
N G
W a W O• C
1 C
�
A
N
i i C
r
h P u
l u q
°
q N
N
S Y C'�•
Ir^
W
V
T y
1
e
'�•
_
C q
1W
If
V T d W P
O d� C N
d L
LYU
C Y O^ F
t
L
V- 3
.J^
d� q 6
d r^
N p
_V
WNA OA
VN L'
}C9�°
6'
�u
O
J
r
U E
Nb t7]
Ou °
W
u N N ...
L
u
Wr u u m
7i
C
t
p
N Y
L V H
W
C
C W C
d O
•
C
C N
P t
pN
p
2b p
A.5
L 11 •_ W
HI-
b
Np
�W•� V6u
V ^L
N°au«OL
V
ON
G Y`
�
W
dA
� n
ui
i4
Nu9 �JV.
`«CV+
Ydb
L._O
AG«
6
S CC'C
V�
^u
��
Nu
CO
�du
`p✓
_
WWC
O
=I
L
CPC
ty
Wu
N ^-J Nd
Oj N
q.^
NL 7
Yy G a
M✓
E'•I
r ..uu
N
�J�L
L
�^
^
NO
MA
q O
L
Vq`yG
Y. L U♦ A
r n
4 N
W L
C 7>
CWt
'yN �LA
N• -AN.: C
}I
.•d.�r.
«
qL
Od
C
4OY
A H V
^C
^
6GV
V c
LO
yr
uO ^1
Eq.
LL
dNd_ ♦V..
••'J L
lNW
O u>w
O>u0
1- l V Ot
440-Y
% J „Pq
Zt
q
Ldi Ob
dt N
V C
V L
.O N
Y N
P
PN t>].>
4
OI`yu
Lo'OC
� �
N rv..
6lr uqi
LO
9T
m
a0
r.YO
CO
�^ �.'
r�N NCJ
P ^O
•. L
Cu d
.Y,
d
N
CW
••G.°/YCLV
n
D
C N 1]
C T C
pl
D G
°
N> W •r
W
Q ^ a
�-C
�
�q'
T
d
wON �`°WO
°°P•Jl
«T
`LCWpA
.-
q
.�
d
4'N=
Or
dr
ybFi
^
E
0
y 6 V b
W q V L b
N+ L
^ O
N
S
C
ti
I
O
u
P O O N
O
`� 6 0 N
N
• L
b L
=
^ .-r P U L
L O
pp
u C
O L•
O..V
O O
N O V <. V L
�^
� � �
`
C~i
C
q
Y
L
i (I
A= p
p
OU
p
tL
4 Vf O G u`i •O
V
T
u N
6
y�
y�
N iy �
A G
V
y
N
N 'J
°y�
L
^
V W <I
y
L
�
L
b•
••
1 �
C
U
14 u
d
q
r
O
C
N
Q A
O
� V u
6 q
G P' W j
O
r
1'(
Q
�Y
yN
ryNf
ryNU1
M T
C
E
Y
V
.v
i
y
m rn
O q
N
Q L'
b FO
a
N W
C
!N N
O
N 6
K
A �+1
C >/I
V ^I
C
O
C
O W
u W
c
V� W
V
V
T
p
C O
O V
4 L
N v
L
O L
a
QI 1
O n Y
r 4
q
d q
W
L
0
Y
r
w
O
O
W
W
V
a
c
q
L
b
C
O
•V
N
d
J
qn
d
T
V E
^ ^J
V `
O
✓
L �
O
q
O C
N
W •L
N 'amp
9
O q
VYf 9
Y LV•-
dV(f
N C
N
q
•-. �
N-
-
c °WO N
E «�
i
Diu
O
O<
N
O F✓
N N W
N
L i
w
Lap
u o
`
JP +
qiN
LtgV
�I�
Y
OL •G-•CO
(y
A
c• +C
Sru N
U
0
$
T
N L
N
u
U u Y u 6
O
rp
U L Ac
✓
q
U N U
4✓
c a
c
ou�v
cSc u° a
a� '-P'
�noa
aui�
r
w wL
cuuv i
'O
ou✓
rc
F.
L.
%avy
PL
V w
O CY
•r•YL6
T�nq
O
V
U4-�> q
NC A.•P.VL
LV'10 bJO�a
qw
�
OCUN
yu�d
T G
O q Ll
y L C 6
C
C O
?
O L C L
j N O G •-
4 q O C L .-O•
d N
A T L G
VUOINO
N a
N` WqN=
PA N
yL
W
C07 VO
O ✓q V 6J
du YN Tb
Y A
q+O'G�G
66 y q �
W L W l N W�
4 N
N u Y✓
i
O
y A OTl
9
b.0 C 0
6 NBC 1L
V. Q6 LJHti
6rq-
JLLY
N 1.1
p N
10
A
i
o
v
P L
u
•O+y
J CYCN
O
AL
L
p
P„
LC•J
Nq
Liu
�
vo-
a
n
:our
N
y
u
`(. L'ci
A
ili iOh✓
V
u
�
cL
W
p
c
a-•
•
LY
G W
C�
n
V O q
L
N
T
t
P>
�
O
` V
Op_ ✓
LG
_
L W 6 N
•- V• w
yi
_
q
u
up_
Nq
Ovl
'J'ON
.''NLa
Lyl gNbT
✓
PC
by
M
%
b�«•r
F
N c
SN o
N
w
q
^ w
N•
»
u
�'
O T
.N•.W_.
c ry
L �^
OL y
7 C
Y
O
t' C
L✓ b O
A 11
.Ex
�_ u C G�
L n O'•' M
a
bV
1
NL
O6
u'V
F Ad
NtO 6 O
w
C
r
C
•q
✓r
d�
Vtd
N
n t
L
•
V
IJ
C L r
✓ Z
� L<
•� •r •�•
4 p C V
N
O
d
d
b
✓ n
N
Y
N U
VLC
O G q
W O
Tq gVUr
•O
J
V
C^
N. W
c
N
V
C
U
U••. yO
DOV
i- O.
•'A
ZO
v o
a
O
c
N
u,�,;^,
bites
=e m
L
^ L
No
✓
ao•
C
J
u•
V
2 •M
q
N
N q
'Z-5
L C
^
1.
f:
W
V
y l✓
N N
L 9 u
^
L
p+
2 y
«
y
L
q •-
O P 4 fi
O N {a
O
O+- NV
� LO N
p
d
q
Oa
`
��•-
d]uV
✓W
'b�
OL R6
�;U •-CNp
r
N
O.
>u
}
bVGpr
EO-
«O
-
A
«�
a
G4
O
p
lb
d
q
V
W q` O
p
iW
w
N
F_SI
N
p
o. a'
a
p
PO �•
'LJ� V
L
P
W•C
•u•V p✓
b N q•- T
W�
dam-
�
A
s
rL
n L a
V q L
•° Q
L T �P
y
c� a
e
u
q
m
p N
c
ea
`�g�
•-
op c
A
O p .v
u w
N
wP
LN.o
W
L
O
✓
G
W
O
U
W C
q T
m L N y
a V N V
9
u
N L
q
A
N
N U<
T
L
U
u N C
q V
E-
•� a
u p Z
n
v
d✓ y
u
VL�r
OiV
PAC
..
u0
'^ n
J^I
NV
NP
L✓
6«C10M
00✓
00
NC
G��
yi
G6
'
Lu0
C� Nn
60L
N`
b6
•^YV
Z'^
Cy
�L
.-F
LV•grb
L
>IA
Lu
6 n
L
w
u
O«
�
•'•�
q
�p
a O 9
Z i
a •�
VI
N Y C
V +• n l
W O
q•r•
P
O d
V i
d✓
L q
L Y
V V
T s V I
b C�
W
V Y�
d C A
V 7 q
q� O'
YC C
N✓
� U
••• ]
N^
'
y
N ` d
L^ u
J N
U L: r 4 L
O d d V
F W
L
•- a
OY O
C✓T �
L N L
h-
a
O
� OI
O�
6 U
q C{•�
q W
y
L up
N
O•A
VU
LT�
V
L
J^
!
�V
L••L•OCL
OU'•L'
696
lam[' ]N
yN N
=VL
90R
•,'r
M
u a
+
WPL
O 6
6V
LL q
r• r u
6 �. ✓u• K V]i
r l I u✓i u n
YC- ✓
(a N i
n Y
< �
O
Cwi
Y L lr
J
11
I'd
CITY OF RANCI-10 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 8, 1981
TO: Planning Conmission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Sidewalk Resolution
1977
At its March 11 meeting, the Commission directed that a policy on the placement
of sidewalks on streets built as a part of land development be prepared.
The attached draft resolution is presented for your consideration as such a
policy. The placement proposed in the resolution is based on past decisions
by the Commission. To encourage non -auto travel to and from work, sidewalks
may be desirable on some industrial local streets.
Please note that the "collector" category does not apply in industrial areas.
Regarding local streets in residential areas, only density has been considered,
not street length, since auto use is fairly heavy even on short streets in small -
lot areas. Also, smaller yards withaut sidewalks usually result in a sloppy,
unkempt appearance and leave little paved area for children to use. The Circu-
lation Plan in the proposed General Plan shows the location of all existing
"collector" and larger streets in the City.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission discuss the draft resolu-
tion and adopt it, amended if necessary, as future sidewalk policy.
Respectful ?y submitted,
LBH:PAR:jaa
Attachment
1
ITEM E
11
11
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION' OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING THE PLACEMENT
OF SIDEWALKS ALONG PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
WHEREAS, street improvements in conjunction with land development
have, by ordinance, been found necessary for the safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the City; and
WHEREAS, to provide for the safe movement of pedestrians,
sidewalks should be included in such improvements; and
WHEREAS, a firm policy is needed to determine the placement of
sidewalks,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that sidewalks, when constructed
as a part of new development, are required as follows:
1. On Special Boulevards:
Both sides,all areas.
2. On Major and Secondary Arterials:
Both sides, all areas.
3. On Collector Streets:
Both sides in residential and commercial areas.
4. Local Streets:
Both sides in residential areas with a density of 2 or
more units per acre.
One side in residential areas with a density of less than
2 units per acre.
One or both sides in industrial areas as needed to
facilitate the use of transit or car pooling.
The Planning Commission may require additional sidewalks if it
finds them justified by such needs as safe routes to school, mass transit
access or others.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
'.l
Resolution No.
Page 2
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Ranc;.o
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 8th day of April, 1981 by the following vote ts-
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
El
0
11
D
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA
STAFF RE PORT
DATE: April 8, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: A REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF A _C
installation of a temporary trail
on Tract No. 10491 located on the
Victoria and Ramona Avenue.
ONAL USE PERMIT for the
er for residential sales
southwest corner of
1977
ABSTRACT: INCU Development Corporation has requested that the Planning
Commission waive the policy for requiring a Conditional Use Permit for
the use of trailers for temporary residential sales offices. Staff has
reviewed the request and feels if the Commission is desirous to waive
the review process that we could provide the necessary review to assure
adequate parking and improvements will be provided for safe usage of the
temporary sales office. This report recommends that the Planning Com-
mission consider the policy of requiring Conditional Use Permits for use
of temporary trailers for residential sales offices,and if they find that
the review process suggested by the Staff is appropriate, then the policy
should be modified.
BACKGROUND: In December of 1979, the Planning Commission made the
determination that the use of a trailer as a temporary residential sales
office was a permitted use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use
Permit. Since that time we have only had one request for a trailer which
was processed and approved. However, the developer did not utilize his
approval for the trailer and instead located the sales office in a model
home complex. During the review of that request the Planning Commission
required that certain off -site and on -site improvements occur for pre -
sales activities. Those improvements included such things as on -site
parking, safe ingress and engress through offsite improvements such as
compacted ;iggrigate subbase in the street where access will be taken,
save curbs and gutters,and some landscaping. Tne biggest concern in
locating a trailer, at this time, for pre -sales activities, is the fact
that customers will be brought onto a site which is presently under con-
struction. If appropriate improvements and safeguards are not taken, the
customers may be subjected to undue hazards. The developer of Tract No.
10491 has submitted a letter, which is attached for your reivew, requesting
that the Conditional Use Permit process be waived in lieu of Staff review.
Under the Zoning Ordinance, review of temporary sales office for resi-
dential projects is subject to Staff review and approval and a condition
of a cash deposit to ensure removal and restoration of site and /or
structure. If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the Staff
reviewing said application, that the Planning Commission could defer
ITEM F
AMk
CUP Waiver _Z- April 8, 1981
Staff Report
review of the trailer to Staff under the ncemal review process. How-
ever, Staff would seek Commissions guidance as to the type of improve-
ments the Commission would feel appropriate for pre -sales activities.
The developer has not yet, at this time, provided any detailed imfor-
mation relative to the placement of the trailer or extent of improve-
ments proposed for parking or offsite improvements.
Since the Commission has concerns relative to the use of trailers
as temporary sales offices, on option may be for the Commission to
consider the development of standards for the regulation and placement
of such trailers, in lieu of the C.U.P. process, which Staff could use
in their review of such a request.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
provide Staff guidance relative to this policy and decide whether or
not the concerns can be resolved without requiring a C.U.P. If the
Commission feels the Conditional Use Permit process is not necessary,
is tlen it is recommended that the Commission direct Staff to prepare a
RE;olution setting forth standards for placement of trailers in such
developments.
Respectfully submitted,
BKH :MV:cd
,
H
11
INCO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
March 20, 1981
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
I
(;: r m n
CITY OF PA c li0 CUC/,NJ fJGA
COP +1Po1! ?t911'Y DEVEI OPMENT DEPT.
AM Pill
Reference: Temporary Sales Offices - New Home Developments
Gentlemen:
Existing ordinances require that all new home developments desiring
a temporary sales office go through the conditional use permit process,
including the payment of significant fees, a public hearing, and being
subject to additional requirements that may be imposed.
The time and costs involved are onerous, particularly in smaller develop-
ments.
We understand that the city would like to be certain that the temporary
sales facility be attractive, and be in fact, temporary. We typically
rent office type trailers (that are attractive) and we provide stairways
and landings which are wide and safe.
We would not object to a requirement that we move our sales facilities into
one of the new homes upon receipt of final inspection and utility hook -up.
Our sales facilities will certainly be more attractive than temporary
construction - offices, therefore, it is unreasonable for the city to impose'
any additional requirements.
We must avoid additional costs that do not add to the value of the new home.
Please consider this as our request for relief in this matter.
Very truly yours,
INCO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
C. Norris
ICN:lp
287 North Mountain Ave -ue Upland, California 91766 (714) 981 -8989
11
1�1
CITY OF RAN (J-10 CUCA.MONGA
ST)UT BLEPOBT
DATE: April 8, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hagan, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CABLE T.V.
INTRODUCTION: Recently, in conjunction with the approval of tentative
tract maps, questions have been raised concerning cable television.
- What areas of Rancho Cucamonga already have Cable T.V.?
- Who is responsible for installing a cable system, and
who pays for the installation?
- What is Cable T.V.?
- Do we need it in Rancho Cucamonga?
- If Cable T.V. is desirable, should the Planning Commission
require developers to install cable as a condition of ap-
proval on a subdivision?
This background tmaterialsnecessaryltoianswernthe e aquestions, and provides
WHAT IS!CABBE T.V:?
Cable television began on a modest scale in the late 1940's as a
means of delivering television signals to areas unable to receive
over - the -air T.V. channels because they were too far from the trans-
mitters or obstructed by mountains. By installing an antenna on too
of the mountain or closer to the transmitter, a stronger signal could
be sent via cable to the home television set. Thus, in its early
days, cable was primarily a way of improving reception. Advances in
the state -of -the -art have created a billion dollar a year cable tele-
visioa industry. With the advent of satellite programming, dish an-
tennas can now pick lap and relay signals From satellites, making it
possible to offer a wide spectrum of entertainment choices for the
T.V. viewer.
There are two kinds of cable T.V. hookups:
Basic Cable: A consumer pays an installation charge and
a monthly fee to have his T.V. set hooked up to cable.
This enables the viewer to watch all twelve VHF channels,
including some out -of -the -area stations, and possibly
more UHF channels. Basic cable is used primarily by the
consumer for better reception.
ITEM G
;1I,,
April 8, 1981
Cable T.V,
Page Two
Pay Cable:. For extra monthly charges the consumer can
purchase premium services, such as Home Box Office, Show -
time, or "Z" channel. Any such service that a subscriber
ic%-1 tii�iiy'1 G56ie i5 GunJlQereO pay Cable. What the
consumer really pays for is a "convertor box" for the
television set that enables it to receive additional chan-
nels. Pay cable systems, which can bring up to 64 channels,
typically offer uncut movies, 24 -hour sports channels, Con-
gressional coverage, religious channels, children's and
adult programming, Spanish- speaking channels, and in some
areas, even local city council meetings.
Cable television faces competition from other non -cable pay -T.V. services:
Subscription Television: The consumer pays the usual in-
stallation charge and monthly fee in return for a "decoder
box" that decodes or unscra,abies a transmission for r_cep-
tion on the television set. In Southern California, the two
largest subscription television (STV) operators, ON ;V and
SELECT -TV, offer movies and sports. As a non -cable system,
STV offers only one channel and television reception is slot
improved.
Multipoint Distribution Service: A television transmission
is delivered, via microwaves, to a home dish antenna con-
nected to the TV set. The consumer pays an installation
charge and monthly fee to lease the antenna. The problem
with multipoint distribution service (MDS) is a limited range
of 25 miles and it requires the receiving antenna to be in
the line of sight of the transmitter.
Satellite Television: Potentially cable T.V.'s biggest
competitor is direct satellite to home transmission. In
this case each house would have its own dish antenna capable
of receiving as many signals as the satellite can beam, thus
making each home a private cable systram. Home Box Office
customers can pay $125 for an antenna unit to receive HBO's
satellite programming in areas without cable.
April 8, 1981
Cable T.Y.
Page Three
The programming possibilities for cable television are virtually in-
finite, depending only upon what the consumer is willing to p&y for.
The list below, from Theta Cable T.V.,is an example of the wide va-
riety of programming currently available to the cable T.V. consumer.
Channel
Setting Programming
�z THETA MOTION PICTURES
2 KNXT CH. 2 C.B.S.
3 Theta Channel 3
4 KNBC CH. 4 N.B.C.
5 KTIA CH. 5 IND.
6 KCET CH. 28 P.B.S.
7 KABC CH. 7 A.B.C.
8 KMEX CH. 34 IND./
Sports Headlines
9 KH1 CH. 9 IND.
10 KWHY CH. 22 IND.
11 KTIY CH. I I IND.
12 KBSC CH. 52 IND.
13 KCOP CH. 13 IND.
A SHOWTIME (New Subscription
TV Service. Alovies, Las Vegas
and Broadway Specials.)
B KVCR CH. 24 P.B.S.
C Comparative Shopping Guide
D Local Time and Weather/
24 Hour Service
E Local School. Educational Use
F KSCI CH. 18
Financial News —UPI
G New York Stuck Exchange
H KHOF CH. 30 REL.
t KTBN CH. 40 RE_
i WTBS 24 -Hour Super Station
from Atlanta. Exciting Sports.
Movies. Features.
K ESPN All- Sports Satellite
Channel. 17+ Hours Per Day.
NCAA /Pro Sparts.
L KLCS CH. 58 ED.
M Sate:litc Programming: CNN.
(Turner 24 -Hour All -News
Station). La Verne residents—
see Channel 3.
N Satellite Programming Guide.
ESPN /W ±BS
O Sports Scorebtard/
24 Hour Service (Music
Background Muted).
P Recreational Weather
News /24 -Hour Service
WHO HAS CABLE T.V. 114 RANCHO CUCAMONGA?
Like a public utility, cable companies can only do business if they are
awarded a franchise from the local governing body. The San Bernardino
County Board of Supervisors awarded non - exclusive franchises to four
cable T.V. operators for the Rancho Cucamonga area prior to incorporation.
These franchises do not specify levels of service or define service areas.
Vii;'
Cable T.V.
April 8, 1981
Page Four
One franchise holder, Six -Star Cablevision presently does not provide
service i„ tea City. Tile uidest caole company in Rancho Cucamonga,
Visual Enterprises Venture, laid cable twelve years ago in Alta Loma.
Visuals' 700 subscribers receive all VHF and UHF chann ^ls plus Home
Box Office (movies and sports). Cable T.V. of Alta Loma has 1,985
subscribers and offers 17 channels and "Z" channel (movies). In the
Cucamonga area, Theta Cable T.V. offers its 800 customers 27 channels,
Z channel (Theta Motion Pictures), aid Shewtime (movies, Las Vegas
and Broadway specials). The map below indicates cable T.V. service
areas as of January 1981.
CABLE TV SERVICE AREAS
Cable TV of Alta Loma
IW: Theta Cable TV
MM Visual Entwwioes Ve,.uwe
E
L 1
1
Cable T.V.
April E, 1981
Page Five
D
HOW CABLE T. V. WORKS
The problem with conventional teleyisi.on boradcasts i5 that some
stations have less powerful transmi. :ters than others. Tbat's why
Channel 2 may come in "pi;cture. perfect" on your T,V, set, wh-ile
Channel 13 reception is weak and "snowy ". To resolve this problem,
cable operators place amplifiers in the cable every 1 to 2 thousand
feet to maintain the strength.or "integrity" of the.signail; There-
fore, in a cable system, the television set receives, all channels
at virtually the some optimum signal strength..
All cable systems start wi,tfk a "he d -in" station that consists cr
a seoarate T.V. antenna for each channel. The function of the.heod-
in station is to rper_ive and ampWy each channel for distribution
to the home.. Thosz cable systems 'eaturing satellite programming
also have an "earth" or "ground" station with a large dish antenna
to receive satellite transmissions ffom these receiving Stations
the T.V. signal is sent to a commui.ity via a main trunk cable, Ge-
nerally speaY,ing, trunk cable is at overhead line hung on the same
poles as telephone and electric tires; this is known as an aer.al
plant. Smaller cable, known as distribution or feeder line, branches
off from the trunk and delivers the televi.sir•n signal to edch_tract,
The State Subdivision hlap Act requi, °es all utilities to be installed
underground in new subdivisions. �hxs, means that cable companies
are unable t(, use an aerial plant f)r their feeder lines, and must
lay their distribution lines up each street in the same trench with
the uti.lttie.s. There are two kinds of underground plant for cable
television: direct - buried and dry -line Cconduitj, The direct -
buried system uses "armored" cable ghat has a protective layer of
corrugated metal. This type of cable its laid directly into the.
trench, in a bed of sand. A dry -lire system means that cable is
run through PVC plastic conduit for protection. Both types of .under-
ground plant use "flooded and jacketsd" cable that is treated with.a
special water proofing compound_.
A device called a tap is used to comiect the lateral "drop" cable
to the house with the distrubitun Itke in the street, Each tap is
enclosed in a concrete or plastic Ya0 t called a tap boy, which
normally occurs every four homes. Sometimes an above - ground pedestal
enclosure is used for a tap, usually in the backyard. Each home, in
turn, is "wired" with wall outlets fcr the cable, similar to a phone
Cable T.V.
April 8, 1981
Page Six
jack outlet. In the case of basic cable service, a rable runs from
the wall outlet to the television set. If the consumer has pay
cable service, with a converter, then the ca')le goes through the
converter to the T.V.
INSTALLATION COSTS
Because of the high cost o;' installing cable infrastructure, it is
estimated that for the next 10 years, the cable T.V. industry will
need $14 billion in capital to build rew systems and rebuild old
ones. T` high cost is attributed to the large number of cost va-
riables avolved; such as, the type of plant, when the cable is
installed (during or after completion of a tract), soil type, and
the number of street intersection. crossings. All of these factors
can significantly affect the cost of laying cable and any figures
used herein should Li interpreted with this in mind.
The most important financial consideration to a cable company, in
terms of installing cable, is when the cable is laid. Normally, cable
is laid in the same trench with utilities during construction. This
saves the cable company the cost of trenching, which can range from
$5,000 a mile in good soil to $11,OOL a mile in the rocky soil of
Alta Loma. The price for laying underground cable is about $1.2,000
a mile for dry -line and $8,000 a mile for direct - buried.
Theta Cable T.V. uses a dry -line system for their installation;
citing t',e high maintenance costs associated with direct - buried
cable as the reason for using conduit. Cable laid using the direzt-
buried system, a':,:iough it has a protective casing, is susceptible
to damage from rocks that can dent the cable. Repair of direct -
buried cable requires excavation to e?tpose the cable for repair;
hence, the added cost of trenching, backfilling, and repairing. In
a dry -line system, "pull boxes" are spaced along the conduit with a
rope inside that is used to pull cable free of the conduit for repairs.
Cable T.V. of Alta Loma and Visual Enterprises Venture prefer a
direct - buried system because of the lower capital outlay for :nsta.-
lation.
Because of the high cost of laying cable, cable operators are very
concerned with the "3at: ration factor ". the percentage of homes in
an area that subscribe to cable. Most cable companies will only provide
11
Pane Seven
cable service in areas where they can expect a 40 -50 percent sub-
scription rate. "It takes a 33 -35 percent subscription rate just to
break even," according to Don Canfield of Theta Cable T.V. Cable
T.V. is a hiah -risk business; accordingly, cable companies expect
a 19 to 20 percent return on their investment. Cable T.V. of Alta
Loma estimates that theywust :each or "expose" fifty homes per mile
of plant (at a 50% saturation factor) to make a reasonable profit.
Therefore, cable companies will not run underground cable to a new
area just to expose a small tract of LO or 30 homes. If, however,
reception in this area was so poor that they could expect a 90 to
100 percent subscription rate, or if CC &Rs prohibited antennas,
then it would be economically justifiable to la_v trunk or distri-
bution lines.
ANALYSIS: In considering attaching conditions to tentative tract
maps co require cable installation, not only should the cost to extend
cable company distribution and trunk lines be considered, the cost
per unit to the developer and the need for cable should be analyzed.
One of the problems in discussing cable T.V. is the disparity in cost
per dtelling unit figures used by various groups or ind4iduals. The
disparity is caused by differences in what these figures represent in
terms of actual cable installation: discussing figures on installation
of a cable system is futile unless everyone agrees upon what goes into
that cable system. Case in point: the fol owing condition was attach -
ed to a recent approval of a tract in Upland.
Underground utility services shay. include dry -line Cable
T.V. facilities. Provided further, that all dwelling units
shall be pre -wired for Cable I.V. service.
This type of "bla.-. 'Ket condition" doesn't specify the size of conduit,
number of pullboxes, or how many cable T.V. outlets each home should
have. On the basis of this condition, it would be difficult to ar-
rive at a meaningful estimate of the cost per house.
-o supply each house in a subdivision and setbacks with cable requires
100 -200 feet of conduit (depending upon lot width and setbacks). A
2 -inch P* '�! conduit costs about 50d a foot, therefore, the cost of con-
duit per house is $50 to $60. Add to this the cost of pre-wiring each
home, labor, and pull boxes, and the total cost of providing cable ser-
vice begins to escalate. (In the Cit, of Rancho Cucamonga, ow, standard
condition at this time requires the developer to provide cable televi-
sion conduit only.) For example, a recent 125 -lot subdivision in Ontario
cost about $60 to $70 per house to install a simple dry -line system,
not including the cost of pre - wiring each housa. Ron Nottingham, En-
gineer for Lewis Homes, estimates that a complete dry -line cable T.V.
system would cost $300 per house, including 3 or 4 outlets in each
home at $10 apiece; but, unfortunately, could not itemize this figure.
Using costs supplied by the various Cable TV companies and actual con -
struction contracts, the following should be an accurate appraisal of
the actual cost to install a dry -line system.
Cable T.V.
Aprii 8, 1981
Page Eight
$150 to $180
+ __$22.50
$172.50 - 205.00
+ 2_ 0.00
$1922.50 - 225.00
2" PVC Conduit, installed @ $1.501ineal foot
A'5 pullbox, installed @ $50 each, 1 box
Total without pre - wiring /4 homes
2 cable outlets
Total with pre - wiring
Whatever the installation. cost for cable is, this cost will ultimately
be transfer.-ed to the homebuyer in the price of the home. Regardless
Of cost, builders resent being required to install what they consider
to be a luxury, cable T.V., just the same as if a city required then
to provide plumbing for a spa on each lot. Ken Willis, of the Building
Industry Association, suraied up this attitude by saying "we oppose it
on the basis that you are using one industry to subsidize another industr Y
"
The need for cable televis' -
ion in the City or Rancho Cucamonga is sup-
ported by two thoughts; the growing use of Cable T. V. for entertain-
ment and the necessity for proper reception. Proponents of cable tele-
vision can argue the need for cable T.U. by pointing to the increasing
demand among consumers. In il.. :8 about 2.8 million, or 5% of the nation's
56 million T.V. homes h,I cable. Today that figure has climbed to 15.5
million, or 20% of the nation's 76.3 milliou T.V. homes, and indications
are that cable T.V. growth will continue to climb.
In "shaded" or poor reception areas, people talk about "needing" cable
TV so they can continue to enjoy television. Therefore, the saturation
factor (read popularity /demand) in Foothill communities is mur.�, higher
than in the valley floor. Alta Loma, particulary north of Banya. is
a shaded area and, 29% of all homes have cable TV.
The present Cable TV compF•ies are operating under a franchise agreement
approved and adopted by th -.cunty. Unless the City Council adopts its
own Cable TV Ordinance, the City cannot specify to cable companies where
and how service must be provided. If the Council adopts such an ordinance
and grants new franchises, then precise installation requirements could
be imposed on the cable company. As it now exists, cable companies will
provide service only in areas where economically feasit,le; i.e., where
trunk lines eyist and extensions rrom the main line can be made without
substantial cost. Some subdiviscns have been pre- wired, but still do
not enjoy service because the main trunk line is not in close proximity
and may never be, without major improvement costs.
E
11
Cable T.V.
Anril 8. 1981
Page Nine
If it is the Commission's intent to merely provide the capability to
hook -up dwellings to future cable trunks, then this can be accomplished
through installation of dry conduit and pre -wired homes, at rather no-
minal costs. However, since it is not known if all areas of the City
will be served by a company, the Commission may want to consider re-
quiring cable installations only in those portions of the City which
are considered shaded (bad reception areas).
POLICY OPTIONS
The following is a IIst of policy options available to the Commission
with regard to cable TV.
I. Allow developers to work freely with cable companies
in deciding which tracts should be provided with cable
TV. Basically, a "no policy" stance, would be maintained
until the Council considers adoption of an ordinance and
franchises.
2. Require cable TV facilities only in areas of the community
with poor reception.
® 3. Require cable TV facilities in poor reception areas which
are presently served and accessible to a cable company,
4. Condition all subdivisions to provide cable TV facilities
in conjunction with the approval of tentative tract maps.
RECOMMENDATION:
At this time, it would appear inefficient to require all subdivisions
to provide cable installations when it is not known whether or not
that area will ever ;^eceive service. Until a cable TV ordinance is
adopted and franchises granted, this option would seem inappropriate.
Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider re-
quiring installations only in poor reception areas and areas currently
served by companies. (Option, No. 3.)
tted,
BKH:DC:cd:jk